K u. THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES Ex Lihris SIR MICHAEL SADLER L948 WITH THE ACQUIRED OF ALUMNI O »F EDUCATION .y^: i ''•" TO''-' e "r-f'-i-M \. ^ K ..*■■ V 'J * !•>.■ m^ .^^1 ""SB;'''- ■<*'/ J.^'.rK- Jxt k'4t- ^siiMfei. ^ I THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS T H !•: TRAINING OF TEACHERS AM) UTHER EDUCATIONAL PAPERS S. S. LAURIE, A.M., F.R.S.E. Professor of the histiinics and History of Ediicatioit, Uniz'trsiiy of Edinhtirgh ALTIIOR OF " PRIMARY INSTKfCTION IN RKI.ATION TO EDUCATION," "JOHN AMOS COMENILS," ETC., ETC. LONDON KEGA.X PAUL, TRENCH >k CO., i, rATERNOSTEK .SQUARE 1SS2 PREFACE. The following papers, having been written on different occasions, contain inevitably some repetitions and do not offer a continuous or adequate treatment of any- one Educational topic. They are also somewhat polemical in tone — a defect for which I would apologize were not the questions with which they deal still subjects of debate. In truth, it is simply because the various addresses and papers refer to still vexed questions that I have thought it desirable to reprint them. S. S. L. University of Edinburgh, jfanuary, 1882. P.S. — / have to thank the Messrs. Loiig7nan for permission to reprint the paper 071 Montaigne ajid the article entitled '^''Thc House of Lords and Popular Education " which originally appeared in " Fraser''s Magazine P «-l^ ^!^9^a CONTE NTS. TiiF. Traimnc ok the Tkaciier, i'AGij: 1. Inaugural Address delivered on the Occasion of the Founding of the Chair of the Institutes and History of Education in the University of Edinlnirgh ... 3 2. The Philosophy of Education in its Relation to the School and the Teacher .. . ... ... ... 57 3. The University Training of Teachers [the Code] ... 92 Primary Instruction. 1. The House of Lords and Popular Education ... ... 121 2. Higher Primary Schools ... ... ... ... 151 3. The Higher Instruction in Primary Schools as illustrated by the Administration of the Dick Bequest... ... 175 Skcondary or High Schools. 1. .Secondary Education in .Scotland ... ... ... 187 2. The (lOvernment of .Secondary or High .Schools ... 200 3. The Claims of Zr?/?';? as a Subject of Instruction ... 213 montaic.ne as an educationalist ... ... ... 23i The Educational Wants of Scotland ... ... 261 AuTHORiiY IN Relation to Discipline ... ... 309 Sketch ov the History of the Education Department 341 THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. BELL CHAIR OF THE THEORY, HISTORY, AND ART OF EDUCATION.* The first occupant of a Chair new to the Universities of Great Britain is placed in a somewhat pecuhar position. It may be fairly expected of him not merely to correlate the new subject with the other studies of a University, but to vindicate for it a right to the promotion which it has obtained, to explain its bearing on the educational interests of the country at large, and to satisfy the sceptical as to its direct utility. Were I, however, to undertake to maintain a thesis so large, I should weary even the well-disposed listener, and probably fail after all to convince or convert the unfriendly. A broad treatment of the subject would involve me in a range of argument, fact, and illustration, so wide and varied, that I think it better to assume very much on the general question. I am entitled indeed to make large assumptions, if the educational movement of the last thirty-five years has had any genuineness and honesty in it ; if education * Inaugural Address. 4 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. has been anything more than a pretext for political and ecclesiastical contention. It is not improbable, moreover, that by limiting my range of observation, and confining myself to the objections taken to the foundation of this particular Chair, while at the same time giving some indication of my own point of view with respect to the question of Education, I may do more than could be accomplished by a general treat- ment, to reconcile the hostile and the sceptical to this new event in educational histor}-. But, first, a few words as to the foundation. Dr. Andrew Bell was born in St. Andrews, in 1753. At the ancient University of that town he was distinguished in most subjects of study, but especially in Mathematics and Natural Philosophy. After spend- ing some years as a tutor in the Southern States of America, he returned to this country, took orders in the Church of England, and sailed for Madras. There, he was appointed to an army chaplaincy, and undertook, along with his other duties, the super- intendence of the Military Male Orphan Asylum, which was instituted after his arrival in the Presidency. It was while devoting himself with singular earnestness and assiduity to the work of education in this hospital that he was driven, almost by the necessity of his position, to invent the system of mutual tuition with which his name \v\\\ be ever associated. After Dr. Bell's return to this country he devoted himself to the dissemination of his system, being sustained in his THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 5 unceasing activity not a little by the rivalry of Joseph Lancaster. Out of the labours of the latter grew the British and Foreign School Society, and out of the labours of the former the National Society in con- nection with the Church of England. The principle of mutual instruction of boys by boys was the discovery by which Dr. Bell hoped to regenerate the world. But in truth the invention and application of this method was not his sole merit. He was a genuine teacher, having quick sympathy with the nature of boys, and great readiness of resource in the schoolroom. Many of our established practices were first introduced by him, and some of his improve- ments are only now being adopted. My impression is that prior to his undertaking the charge of the Madras Orphan Asylum in 1789, it was not usual strictly to classify the pupils of a primary school ; and we are all aware that it is only the other day that the leading schools of Scotland began to arrange their pupils in classes according to their progress, and that in some schools of high reputation (incredible as it may seem), classification on this basis has not even yet been attempted ! I shall not on this occasion enter further into Dr. Bell's educational reforms, but content myself with saying that at present, and until better informed, I am disposed to regard him as the founder of the Art of Primary Education in this country, as a conscious art. Dr. Bell destined his large fortune mainly for the foundation of specific Educational Institutions, the 6 THE TRAINING OF TExVCHERS. residue to be applied to educational purposes, ac- cording to the discretion of his Trustees, enjoining on them always to have due regard to the promotion of his system. The interest of this money was for many years paid away in small grants to various schools throughout the country in connection with the Church of Scotland ; but after the passing of the Education (Scotland) Act, in 1872, which made uni- versal provision for schools, the Trustees, who at present are the Earl of Leven and Melville, .Lord Kirkcaldie, and Mr. John Cook, W.S., resolved to employ a portion of the funds in their keeping for the purpose of instituting Chairs of Education in Edin- burgh and St. Andrews, to be called the " Bell Chairs of the Theory, History, and Art of Education," im- posing on the occupants the duty of expounding, in the course of their prelections. Bell's principles and system. They thereby fulfilled in the most effectual way, under existing circumstances, the objects which Dr. Bell had in view in originally constituting the trust. Certainly no one who has read the " Life of Dr. Bell," by Southcy, will doubt that this resolution of the Trustees would have been in the highest degree pleasing to him. Almost with one voice the teaching profession have hailed the action of the Trustees as a great educational advance. It has been felt that the three gentlemen above named have conferred honour on a department of work which Dr. Bell delighted to honour. They have unquestionably done very much to promote education in Scotland, not only by raising THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. / the work of the schoolmaster in public estimation, but also by attracting public attention to education as being not merely a question of national machinery for the institution of schools (essential though this un- doubtedly is), but a question of principles and methods — in brief, of philosoph}-. I can do no more on this occasion than make a merely passing allusion to the zealous efforts of the late Professor Pillans to do what the Bell Trustees have now accomplished. A Chair of the Theory, History, and Art of Edu- cation having been instituted, we have now to ask what the objects of such a Chair are. There has been much misunderstanding; with regard to these. Some are at a loss to know what there is to say on education within the walls of a University, and what the principles and history of that subject have to do with the schoolmaster's work. Others, who have not to be instructed on these points, dread the competition of an Education Chair with the existing Training Colleges. The latter class of objectors is the more important. They arc at least aware that the necessity of training teachers in methods and in school organiza- tion is not a question to be now for the first time debated. They know that the question has been settled tlicsc thirt)- years by the combined intelligence of the Government of the country and of the Educa- tion Committees of the various Churches. The former class of objectors have nothing to urge against the 8 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. University training of teachers in the philosophy and niethods of education, which they would not have been prepared with equal readiness and confidence to urge against the institution of the existing Training Colleges thirty years ago. Indeed, I am disposed to think that had the general question of the desirable- ness of training teachers to their professional work been propounded thirty years ago for discussion on its own merits, it would not yet be settled in the affirma- tive. The Parliamentary Philistine, the " Church in danger " men, and above all (strange to say) a con- siderable proportion of those engaged in the work of teaching, would have been opposed to the intro- duction of any such novel idea in practical form. Many as are the evils of centralization, it is unquestion- ably to the centralizing action of the Committee of Privy Council that we owe the full recognition of the efforts which were being made thirty-five or forty years ago in London and Edinburgh to train teachers, and the consequent growth of the Training College system. The work was done t/irottgh the Churches, and accordingly called forth no Church opposition, and as money was freely offered to all who desired training, the rest of the world readily acquiesced. The effect of this action on the part of the Privy Council has been most beneficial. Almost all now recognize that there is an art of teaching and of school- keeping, and that teachers should be trained in that art. It is only among that class of teachers and pro- fessors who have never come into close contact with THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 9 the existing system of training that doubts and objec- tions survive. Quietly, and almost unnoticed, a great new Institution has established itself in the United Kingdom, and has ()\-cri)o\\crcd every possible theo- retical objection to its existence by the practical benefits it has conferred on the country. It is there- fore too late now to discuss the general question. The practical result is before us, and the occupation of teacher has been finally raised into a profession by requiring, as the condition of entering it, a professional discipline. Notwithstanding many defects — and I suspect that even in our University system there are defects — the Tra ining College system has been a success. The kind of work done in these institutions, and the extent to which they have taken their place as semi- naries second only to the Universities themselves, would, if inquired into, astonish the few who have hitherto ignored their existence. I am also satisfied that the improvements which have taken place even in secondary instruction have been due largely, if not chiefly, to the indirect influence of the Training Colleges, although these exist for the training of Primary teachers alone. Every manjconnected with education must be so well informed on this the most im portant ^modern movement in educational history that to dwell longer on it would be superfluous. My purpose in referring to it at all is to limit the range of any argument which might naturally be expected from me on this occasion. lO THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. For, the necessity of training the future teacher not only in the subjects which he is afterwards to teach, but in the art which he is to profess, being once for all a settled matter, I am at liberty to confine my remarks to the narrower question of the training of those aspirants to the scholastic profession, w^ho pass through the Universities. Those aspirants are either self-supporting or partly dependent on small bursaries gained in open competition, and their purpose is to prepare themselves for the higher class of Public Schools (which, in their upper departments, are in truth secondary schools), and for purely Secondary or Grammar Schools either in Scotland or other parts of the Empire. As it is at once evident that attend- ing University classes instead of the classes of a Training College has no such great virtue in it as to enable University men to dispense with professional training more than their humbler fellow-teachers, it is superfluous to argue the point. It may be at once assumed that, as the schools for which they are pre- paring themselves, at least those in Scotland and the Colonies, comprehend within them at once primary and secondary instruction, the need of professional training, in the case of University students, is pecu- liarly great. Where are they to get this ? The}- might be required to combine attendance at a Train- ing College with attendance at the University for a degree ; but this, though it might serve as a pro- visional arrangement, would not secure the end we seek. And why would this arrangement not secure THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. II the end we seek ? For this reason, and for no other, that a specialist Training College does not answer the same purposes as a Universit}-. The broader culture, the freer air, the higher aims of the latter, give _to ft an educational influence which specialist colleges can never exercise. It is impossible within my present limits to elabo- rate this view of the question : it is familiar to all educated men. It would appear however that the moment we ^substitute a distinct practical purpose, such as the production of engineers, officers of the army, ministers of the church, as the exclusive aim of education, and arrange the whole machinery of an Institution to attain any one of these ends exclusively, the mental life of the student becomes at once nar- rowed, and education in the higher sense disappears altogether. We all acknowledge this truth when it is supported by our antipathies and we are called upon for an opinion on such seminaries as Jesuit Colleges. But the objections to be taken to these specialist seminaries are, from an educational point of view, substantially the same in kind as may be taken to colleges which have other and merely secular aims. It is desirable therefore t o maintai n-thc position of . the Universities as. the trainers of all those aspirants to . the teaching profession who arc fitted by their pre- vious education to enter on a University curriculum. This is all that is demanded by those who desire a University training for schoolmasters. Is it an un- reasonable demand ? The preliminary training of all 12 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. female student-teachers, and of the great majority of the other sex, make, and will continue in perpetuity to make, Training Colleges a necessity ; but there are some youths whose greater local advantages or greater native energy of mind is such as to have secured for them a better early training in languages and mathe- matics and to have inspired them with a higher ambition than these seminaries can satisfy. Those better trained intellects, those more ambitious natures, ought to have the University open to them. It may be urged, — it is urged by some, — that the students of Training Colleges are welcome to the dis- cipline which the University can give in classics, science, and philosophy, but that the Training Colleges themselves should furnish the purely professional instruction. But the answer to this is, that if the Training Colleges are competent to handle the ques- tion of education as a science and art equally well with the Universities, they are also competent to teach classics, science, and philosophy equally well with the Universities. Latin, I fancy, can be taught ■quite as well in one street of a town as another. What we want is that the student-teac^her shall live in the University atmosphere, and enjoy all those subtle intellectual and moral advantages which belong to that serener._alr. If this be desirable as regards Latin and Mathematics, how much more is it desirable in the case of the principles of education ! Here the student enters into the precincts of Philosophy itself: he has to find the psychological basis and THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 1 3 relations of methods of instruction, he has to think about Education, and try to ascertain what Education precisely is, and what kind of public duty it is which he has before him as a teacher. He has to investigate the principles of his art, and to expand his thought by studying its history. Is it not at once apparent that whatever advantage belongs to the study of classics and science in a University belongs pre-eminently to studies which ally themselves to philosophy and his- tory? Doubtless there are some minds whose educa- tion is so defective and whose imagination is so weak that they are unable to conceive in what respect a University curriculum should differ, as it does differ in its very essence, from a similar curriculum in a specialist college in which a practical limitation of aim vitiates the whole process of education in the higher sense of that term. To such minds I do not address myself Far be it from me to say one word in depreciation of Training Colleges. You will not misapprehend me. I know them too well not to respect them. I have already shown their importance as a part of the educational machinery of the country, their neces- sity as a permanent part of that machinery, and the debt the country owes to them. But they are not Universities — this is all I desire to say — any more than Sandhurst, or Woolwich, or Cooper's Hill, is a University. It is true that certain picked students are now sent from the Training Colleges to certain Universities to attend two of the classes there, and thus 14 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. sniff the academic air ; but this device can never supply the place of a University curriculum and of University life. When, further, we consider that for two hundred years all the leading teachers of the parochial schools of Scotland have been supplied by the Universities, and have carried with them into the most remote parishes some University culture, is it too much to ask that a system which has been so beneficial in the past shall be continued and even more fully developed under the new Statute ? At this moment no man can be appointed to a Public School in Scotland — and the term " Public School " includes all schools, with about a dozen exceptions — who does not possess a Govern- ment certificate. A raw lad from the Hebrides is, after nine or ten months' training, and while yet barely able to write an ordinary letter, while wholly ignorant of Latin, and acquainted with the merest elements of other subjects, technically qualified for any Public School, while a graduate of the Universities is dis- qualified until he undergoes a further examination. This seems hardly credible. I have taken opportuni- ties of bringing this fact before authorities in the Uni- versities from time to time since 1872, but it is difficult to believe that they have yet fairly realized the actual state of things. All the new machinery for education will fail to produce the effect expected of it, if this evil be not quickly remedied.* The Education Department is quite entitled to hold that a University curriculum * The evil has now (1882) been sul»tanlially remedied. THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 1 5 .shall be incomplete, so far as the teacher is concerned, if it do not include a knowledge of the principles and practice of education, but to go further than this is an insult to the Universities of Scotland, which these bodies, however, seem slow to feel. The Universities are being dissociated from the teaching profession. The evil might be faced, and we might reconcile our- selves to the infliction of this blow on the University- system of Scotland, especially as the Universities themselves seem to accept their position with the silence which indicates acquiescence, were it not that the education of the country is imperilled, and all that has been distinctive of Scottish school-life is threat- ened. It is to be hoped that we shall have ere long a recognized University curriculum for teachers, and that the impending danger may thus far be obviated. Do not imagine that the education of the country can be maintained by Codes, with an array of "specific subjects " to be paid for at so much a head. The higher instruction has been given in the past, not for money, but for love. Teachers, having formed their standard at the Universities, carried that standard down with them into the country, and were proud of the opportunity of forming classes in Mathematics and Latin. They felt that they kept themselves up to a higher level by connecting themselves with University work, and they saw that this higher in- struction told on the intelligence, and above all on the morale, of the whole school. It is by sending out able and ambitious men, not by the manipulation of a l6 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. Code (although this too has importance), that true education is promoted. Nor is it only for those who are competent to go direct from, the school to the University that a curriculum is demanded, but also for those Training College students of one or two years' standing, who desire to carry their education further, and to qualify for the higher primary and for secondary schools. In brief, a Faculty of Education is in a certain sense already constituted in the Training Colleges of the Empire : we desire to lift this up, and to constitute such a Faculty in the Universities, because we believe that there is a national work to be done which the Universities are alone competent to do. It is true that, if the curriculum which we contemplate is carried out, a certain small proportion of Training College students will pass over the Training Colleges alto- gether. Is this a matter for regret or alarm ? Are the Scottish Universities, which have always been institutions that maintained a close connection with the people, and endeavoured to supply the wants of the various professions, to be excluded now and per- manently from all connection with the profession of Education, because Training Colleges will lose from 5 to lo per cent, of their students? The heads of the Training Colleges do not, I am satisfied, share the fear which some have expressed, and the finances of these Institutions are placed far above the reach of injury by any such slight innovation. Those who imagine that Training Colleges will be materially affected. THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 1/ except for good, by this new movement, speak in utter ignorance of those seminaries, and the sources of their strength. Further, the institution of this Chair, by providing professional instruction for teachers, not only directly benefits the schools of the country, but it increases the importance of the teaching Body. It gives it an academic standing. It makes it possible to institute for the first time in our Universities a Faculty of Education, just as we may be said already to have a Facult}' of Law, of Thcolog}', and of Engineering, It thereby raises the whole question of the Theory and Art of Education, as such, to a higher level, and may serve more than almost any other external influence to aHract into the occupation of schoolmaster men who might othervvise pass it by for occupations which have hitherto ranked higher in the conventional estimate of the world. It promotes the movement, which has been steadily progressing for twenty years, for the recognition of the large body of teachers as a great national institution — an organized profession, looking, as other professions do, to the University as its source and head, and drawing strength and self-respect from that connection. Difficulties have been thrown in the way by a few, who are at a loss to know what the movement pre- cisely means. Timid and distrustful, and accustomed to follow precedent as the sole safe guide, they have been groping about to find what other people are thinking. What would they say at Oxford and Cam- 1 8 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. bridge ? What do they do at Paris and BerHn ? Now for myself I should certainly be glad to find that any educational movement here was supported by the concurrent approval of other learned centres, but I venture to submit that it is to Scotland that other nations may fairly look for guidance on this question. We in Scotland have been the true pioneers in Educa- tion : and do we now lag so far behind that we must be sending out scouts to see what they are doing in the front ? The traditions and accumulated wisdom of three hundred years are behind us, and with all its defects our present educational system is, as a whole, still worthy of our past history. In this matter, as in others, we claim to lead Europe and America. Still I must so far consider the weak brother as to tell him that in England some of the most cultivated minds of the two Universities, being met together at Winchester in the Headmasters' Con- ference of 1873, discussed the question of instituting Chairs of Education in Oxford and Cambridge. The mere fact that the question was seriously discussed by such a conclave, in a country whose whole training and habit of mind is alien to philosophy, is itself most significant. And although there was no very practical issue to the Conference, opinions of weight were re- corded. While desiderating, as was to be expected, arrangements for practical training, as well as for theoretical and historical instruction, the Bishop of Exeter wrote as follows : — "... It would be well worth while to provide THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 19 that men should have the opportunity of seeing some- thing'' of their business, and of reflecting on what they have seen, before they begin to teach. For this purpose the ideal system would be this : to have a Professor of Education, either in London, or in Oxford, or in Cambridge, or to have one in each ; to require the Professor or Professors to give certificates to such B.A. as attended their lectures and passed a good examination in them." Then Dr. Kennedy of Cambridge, the eminent (Emeritus), Headmaster of Shrewsbury, says : — "... Professional lectures supported by exami- nations and certificates, which should be essential to the function of public-school teaching, though too much must not be expected from them, seem to promise some important good. Especially this, the}^ would give to Education the status of a faculty and profession : they would oblige every master to regard his work as professional, as work to be done on definite principles and with high public responsibility. The}^ would enhance the personal and social dignity of masters, and thereby promote their efficiency, their usefulness, and their happiness. Such professional lectures would, I suppose, be directed to the theory and history of Education, and also to the art and method of teaching : in all which moral and mental science without being directly taught would be assumed and used as principial and regulative." This is well said, and I willingly adopt the words as my own programme. 20 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. Having heard all this, do you think that I push my argument too far when I maintain that the subject of Education as such demands, as of right, a place in the University curriculum, with a view to the constituting of a Faculty of Education ? The philosophy of Educa- tion is, in fact, now a distinct subject, and the import- ance and intimate relation of it to the future welfare of the nation require that it shall be held in academic honour, and provided with academic standing-room. Its relation to the Universities, moreover, as a means of bringing them, through some recognized functionary, a functionary controlled by the responsibilities of his position, into close connection with the whole scholastic machinery of the country, thereby extending their just influence, is sufficiently obvious. We have, however, still other objections to the founding of an Education Chair to face, proceeding mainly from those who take what might be called an Academic view of the question. Education, they say, is an important subject, we admit, but it is too closely allied with practice to be a fit subject for University teaching. It is a subject rather for the laboratory of the schoolmaster than for the theoretical and historical prelections of a Professor. Now it is to be at once admitted that this is a fair subject for debate ; but I am entitled to insist that it shall be discussed as part of a larger question — this question, namely, Is a University to train for professions at all ? My answer to this is, that the business of a University is to train for the profes- THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 21 sions, and that there ought to be within a University as many Faculties as there are recognized professions. It is not because of the claims which the Theory and History of Education can make to be regarded as a subject of general University discipline (though not a little might be said on this aspect of the question, beginning from Plato), that it seeks admission to a University curri- culum. It is as a complement to the Faculty of Arts, as completing the preparation of the teachers of the country for their profession, that it rests its claim. That future Educators who are receiving their general instruction in a University should there also study the subject of Education, is to my mind of the nature of a truism. Nor does it seem possible for any to hold another view without including in their con- demnation all University studies which have a direct bearing on special professional preparation for active life. That a University should close its doors to all save theoretical studies, or at least to all save those which have to do with the cultivation of a man without regard to his future occupation, — is an intelligible and perhaps tenable opinion ; but in these days it is un- necessary to discuss it. One has naturally much sympathy with that conception of a University, according to which it is constituted of a body of learned men whose sole business it is to pursue science and abstract studies generally, while admitting to their workshop only the select few who desire to spend their lives far from the vulgar crowd. But such an institu- 22 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. tion requires only the collegiate life to make it a secular monastery. All monasteries have a certain sentimental charm, and this kind of nineteenth-century monastery not least. But our modern, especially our Scottish, Universities, are far removed from such a conception. They are compromises between the theoretical and the practical. They aim at one end of their curriculum to meet and welcome the intelli- gence of the youth of the country, and at the other to connect themselves with the duties of active life. And if in thus adapting themselves to the needs of the time, they have thought it wise to constitute or com- plete certain Faculties, is the equipping of the future teacher of the country with the principles, history, and methods of his special task of less moment than the equipping of the future engineer, agriculturist, physician, or lawyer ? There is yet another objection taken by a few — an objection which is certainly specious. " We admit," they say, "the importance of the subject in itself; we recognize the desirableness of using the Universities to supply the professions of the country, because we think that we thereby contribute to the strength and dignity of those professions, and send out recruits who, along with their professional knowledge, carry with them a certain portion of University culture, and so contribute to maintain a high standard of social life. This culture we endeavour to give, regarding it as an essential part of the merely professional training, and that whereby we prevent the University from being THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 23 converted into a mere aggregate of specialist colleges. But, while admitting all this, we shall recognize no subject of instruction in any Faculty which cannot rank itself among the sciences, either in itself or by direct affiliation." There is much vagueness and half- thought about this objection. It seems to be forgotten that very many of the existing Chairs are divorced by their very nature from the category of sciences. All those Chairs which have to do with Humane Letters, not merely the Chairs of ancient tongues, but of Philosophy and Literature, and even Law, have a place in the higher education of youth by virtue of qualities which are, it is not too much to say, antago- nistic to the conception of science. The truth is that the objections urged on the scientific ground are a covert attack on The Humanities, and especially on the Philosophy of Mind in all its branches. The objectors start with the assumption that nothing is worthy of University study save science, and at the same moment they restrict the term " science " to aggregates of fact that can be demonstrated in such a way as not to admit of question. There is no science in this, the strictest acceptance of the term, except Mathematics and those branches of knowledge which rests on Mathematics. Botany, for example, is not a science in the re- stricted sense of the term ; it may be one day a science, but as yet it is only a system of classification, and a record of interesting observations and reasonings on the physiology of vegetable organisms — so far as 24 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. they go, correct and verifiable. I may be mistaken, but it seems to me that there is nothing to prevent a discovery in Biology being made, which would revolu- tionize the fundamental conception of Botany in one day. Botany may be held to represent other depart- ments of knowledge to which the name of science is freely accorded. The objectors would not drive such studies as Botany out of the Universities, because they include them (as I think inconsistently) in their notion of science. The fact is that such objectors respect Botany and similar studies because they are at least possible sciences, inasmuch as they deal with what can be seen by the eye of sense, and handled and weighed and measured, and so forth. Their objection to Education as a special branch of study is, when probed to its foundation, this, that it adds another to the list of Humane studies which already disturb their scientific intellects, — to wit Classics, Metaphysics, Logic, Ethics, and, I rather suspect. Political Economy too. To History they may con- descend to give academic standing-room, because after all it has to do with things that did make their appearance as phenomena on the face of the planet, and probably admit of some sort of co-ordi- nation. But as to those other departments of thought which I have named, and all such, the sooner they are despatched to the limbo of ineptitudes the better. It is naturally disturbing to such minds to find sub- jects, which do not admit of exact treatment, assum- ing rank and importance in determining the progress THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 25 of civilization, and in the regulation of contemporary academical arrangements. The most recent improve- ment in the microscope does not enable them to see the so-called things of mind, — the most delicately- adjusted scales will not weigh them ; their genesis and their modus operandi are invisible and impalpable, and their possible and actual results defy any calculus. It is not only disturbing, but distressing that such things should be — nay, that such things should, in truth, constitute the great forces which in all ages have moved the heart of humanity, and have made the history of man. If a science be a synthetic and systematic body of truth regarding a department of knowledge, which starts from certain axiomatic statements, and, by help of a few postulates, builds up its fabric of verity so that each part rises out of another by necessary sequence, then it is well to say at once that Education is not a science, nay, that it never will be a science. But are we to measure its right to a place in a University system by such stringent requirements? If so, what department of study belonging to the Littered Hunianiorcs will stand the test ? Is Metaphysics a science ? In one sense " No," in another it is the scientia scientiaruin — the irpdyT^ ^tXoao^ta. Even in the field of formal Logic do not men still occupy hostile camps ? Of Ethics what shall we say ? For 2400 years men have thought, spoken, taught, but with what scientific result ? With this, that even now the criterion of the right and wrong in conduct, the 26 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. nature of conscience, the very existence of the sentiment of duty as an inner power, are still matters of debate. And yet there is a philosophy, if not a science, of Ethics. Is History a science? Some vainly imagine that it is at least a possible science. Given certain conditions, they are prepared, by the help of the Registrar-General, to predict the history of nations. But it is at once evident that the social movements of the whole involve the equally necessary movement of each individual of that whole, and that a science of History demands for its possibility not only an unbending system of physical laws within which man is to work, but also that man himself shall be an automaton ! And yet though there be no science, there is a philosophy, of History. Is Political Economy a science ? Even now the fundamental principles of that department of knowledge are an arena for discussion. The question of supply and demand is still debated ; the difficulties of the currency question are still open to further discussion ; even the principle of Free-Trade versus Protection is still a moot point. Not perhaps in this country ; but we must not let our insular self-complacency shut our eyes to the fact that in the United States and our Colonies, and on the continent of Europe, the principle of Free-Trade is not merely set aside in practice, but impugned by argument. The very theory of Rent, which J. S. Mill considers to be the pons asinorurii of Political Economy, and the discovery of which is held to be the crowning glory of Ricardo, is still THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 2/ unsettled. Is Jurisprudence a science ? No ; and yet is there no philosophy of Law ? So with Educa- tion. I am quite willing to hand over the word " science " to those departments of knowledge which have to do with Mathematics, and with things seen and temporal, if only I am allowed to comprehend those other studies which truly constitute the life of man under the term Philosophy. As theory. Education allies itself to Psychology, Physiology, and Sociology. The materials of its teaching it draws from these philosophies, from the practice of the schoolroom, and from the rich domain of History. Grant all this, but still those generally well affected to the new study have misgivings. The Chair of Education will be a mere platform for the airing of theoretical views or the enunciation of crotchets. Now I would allay such fears by pointing out, in the first place, that this Chair does not exist for the purpose of talking at large about Education, but of preparing teachers for their profession, and that this practical aim is inconsistent with windy talk. I have some sympathy with the cynical Love Peacock, who, in describing certain social bores in the shape of men of one idea who hold forth in season and out of season, says : " The worst of all bores was the third. His subject had no beginning, middle, nor end. It was Education. Never was such a journey through the desert of mind, the great Sahara of intellect. The very recollection makes me thirsty." Such men are not educationalists in any sense in which 28 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. that term is applicable within these walls. They are men of leisure who have restless minds, and if they have not one fixed idea or crotchet, will find another. An educationalist has no crotchets. That man has crotchets who, having seized on that particular corner of a large and many-sided subject which has some secret affinity with his own mind, or affords the quickest passage to notoriety, pursues it to the death. Now, an educationalist is, by virtue of his very name and vocation, inaccessible to all petty fanaticisms." He has to deal with a subject of infinite variety, and so variously related to life, that he is more apt to be lost in hesitations and scepticisms than to be the victim of a fixed idea. If you wish to meet with educational crotchets, you must go to the specialist in this or that department of knowledge, who is un- fortunate enough to take up the question of Education, as you see he often in moments of aberration takes up other subjects which are outside his own range of intellectual experience. It is only in such cases that you will find the confidence and self-assurance which is born of limited knowledge, and the pertina- cious insistence which flows from these habits of mind. To him whose subject is Education crotchets are prohibited, because his opinions on this or that point are related on the one side to rational and compre- hensive theory, and on the other to the daily practice of the schoolroom and the needs of life. Having dealt thus far with what may be called the THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 29 apologetics of my subject, and arrogated for it a place in our Academic system, whether we regard its in- herent claims or its relation to the well-being of the country, I have, on the other hand, to avoid the error of magnifying too much its importance. The more abstract treatment of the theory of Education is doubtless, if true in its philosophy, of universal appli- cation. It sweeps the whole field. But this will engage our attention only within carefully prescribed limits, and when we leave this portion of our subject, we have to restrict ourselves on all sides. The educa- tion of every human being is determined by potent influences which do not properly fall within the range of our consideration here. The breed of men to which the child belongs, the character of his parents, the human society into which he is born, the physical circumstances by which he is surrounded, are silently but irresistibly forming him. The traditions of his country, its popular literature, its very idioms of speech, its laws and customs, its religious life, its family life, constitute an aggregate of influence which chiefly make him what he is. With these things we have to do only by way of a passing reference ; we have not to deal with them. By their constant presence they mould the future man, himself unconscious. They are the atmosphere of the humanity of his particular time and place, and in breathing it he is essentially a passive agent. Our business is rather with the con- scious and active elements of moral and intellectual growth. We have to make the passive creature of 30 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. circumstance a free, self-conscious, rational agent, endowed with purposes and ideals, and we have to find the means of best doing this. The passive activity of our nature is not to be ignored in our educational methods ; it is to be turned to use as one of our most potent instruments, but it is mainly the self-conscious forces that we have to educe and direct. Even in doing this we are bound by external con- ditions, and must take note not only of the almost irresistible forces around us, but of minor conditions of time, place, and circumstance. Each successive century, and the traditions and circumstances of each country, nay, the genius of each people, present to us the educational problem in ever- changing aspects. Educational systems cannot be manufactured in the study. Our theory of the end of all education and the means by which that end has to be attained may be, or rather ought to be, always the same ; but the application of that theory must vary with varying external conditions. What present defects have we here and noiv, and to what dangers are we exposed ? is the form which the practical question must take with us. Now I would say that one of our chief dangers in these days is the over-instruction of willing and ingenuous boys. We are in the very midst of what will afterwards be desig- nated the information-epoch of Education. We are in danger of confounding the faculty for swallowing with the faculty for digesting. To borrow words from biological science, we sometimes proceed as if the THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 3 1 mind of man grew by accretion and not by intussus- ception. The system of universal examinations has encouraged this. Now a system whereby the teachers of the country are converted into " coaches," is, by its very nature, hostile to the true conception of Educa- tion. No school which converts itself into a coaching establishment is a place of education in the proper sense of that term. There is a repose, a calm, a stability in the steady march of all sound education, which is alien to the feverish spirit that animate the ante-chamber of an examination-room. The aim of the educationalist is not the giving of information, nay, not even instruction, though this is essential, but mainly discipline ; and the aim of dis- cipline is the production of a sound mind in a sound body, the directing and cherishing of the growth of the whole nature, spiritual and physical, so as to make it possible for each man, within the limits of the capacity which God has given him, to realize in and for himself, with more or less success, the type of humanity, and in his relation to others to exhibit a capability for wise and vigorous action. This result will not be attained by pressure. By anticipating the slow but sure growth of nature, we destroy the organism. Many and subtle are the ways in which nature avenges itself on the delicate, complicated machinery of man, but avenge itself somehow it will and must. It is difficult to say which is the more pernicious, that system which overstrains the active intelligence of the willing and ambitious boy, or that which fills 32 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. his mind, while it is yet mainly passive with the results of mature thought, and endows him with a kind of miniature omniscience. Those who survive such methods of training may, doubtless, be very useful agents, very serviceable machines, but they will rarely initiate. With a few exceptions, their minds will be either exhausted or overlaid. That elasticity of spirit which enables a man always to rise to the level of the varying requirements of the day and hour in the Family and the State ; that free movement of will which is ever ready to encounter more than half way the vicissitudes and exigencies of life, that vivacious intelligence which maintains throughout life an un- ceasing love of knowledge ; that soundness, of brain and muscle which reacts on the inner self by giving steadiness to moral purpose, will assuredly not be promoted by forcing more and more subjects into the school curriculum, and applying the pressure of constant examinations by outside authorities. We want men who will be ready for the crises of life as well as for its daily routine of duty, and who will, by their mere manner of encountering even their ordi- nary work, contribute to the advance of the common- wealth in vigour and virtue. Such men alone are fully competent for all the services which their country may demand from them. Such men may be slowly grown, they cannot be manufactured under a .system of pressure. Great Britain has had many such ; Scot- land has been prolific of them. The intellect, the will, and the arm of Scotsmen, have done, we flatter our- THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 33 selves, their fair share in creating the British Empire, and they have done it all by virtue mainly of their breed, and by such restricted education as Arithmetic, Latin, and the Shorter Catechism afforded. No super- incumbent load of impossible tasks oppressed their minds while yet immature. Do not draw a hasty inference from what has now been said. The requirements of the time in which we live, the industrial competition of one nation with another, the revolution in the arts of war, all demand that the materials of Education should change with changing conditions of life. I am quite alive to this necessity — but the inner form must remain ever the same. For after all that can be said, the main object of our efforts must, on one side at least, be the growth of power in the future man. If we would secure this, the pursuit of it must control and regulate the instruction we give, and the method of giving it. Above all, we must not be in a hurry. Having faith in the quiet processes of nature, we must, as educators, be calm, deliberate, and ever regard the end. The power which we desire to foster is the product of Will and of natural force. It is difficult to separate these two elements in any act, but for purposes of thought they may be regarded as distinct. I shall refer again to the element of natural force : our present concern is with power in its intellectual and moral relations, which is Will. It operates in the region of D 34 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. intelligence and emotion alike. The ground and root of intellectual and moral activity is ultimately the same, and the end is the same — the Ethical life. If this can be shown analytically, we shall reduce to unity the whole idea of Education in its merely formal aspect, and supply a conception which, while helping us to estimate the value of educational instruments and methods, will, at the same time, exalt and guide our conceptions of duty as educators. Power^ however, cannot work on nothing, and we have next to consider it in its concrete relations, in order that we may discern and exhibit the content as well as the form of the Educational Idea. True that our range of discussion is in this place finally limited by the practical object which we have im- mediately in view — the production of the good citizen ; but this, though our primary, is not our ulti- mate aim. Citizenship is not the end of human life, but only a means to an end. For, in a certain sense, the ultimate reference of all thought and action of man is to himself as a personality. Christianity, which teaches the most thorough-going altruism, also teaches this ; and in teaching this, it deepened the foundation of the modern doctrine of culture which had been laid by the Greeks. Speaking quite gene- rall}\ Culture may, for want of a better word, be accepted as the end of all exercise of intellectual and moral power, and therefore in its ultimate result the real cntl, of education, just as power is the formal end. THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 35 But in accepting " Culture " as a fit expression for the real end of education, we have to examine care- fully the features of this god as they appear on the canvas of modern litterateurs, and distinguish our own conception from theirs. No finality, no perfect- ness is possible for man, and culture therefore must be restricted, vieVved educationally, to the idea rather of a process than of an attained and stable product. It is the harmonious and continuous growing of a man in all that pertains to humanity. Culture in the sphere of education is, I say, a continuous process — the harmonious balancing of all the varied forces that constitute the life of a human soul. Now such a balancing is impossible save round some centre. From this may be deduced two practical conclusions on education in respect of its content. First, that intellectual culture will be most thorough when a man has some leading subject as the centre of his intel- lectual activity ; and seeondly, that moral culture, the harmonious growth of the soul, is possible only where there is a centre round which all the moral and aesthetic elements of our nature turn. That centre is God Himself, round which reality the sentiments, emotions, hopes, and aspirations of the moral life range themselves. In God alone the ethical life has true existence. If for God we substitute Self, we substitute an empty and barren fact in the room of a pregnant and life-giving Idea. When I say that it is an essential condition of vigorous intellectual growth that a man should have S6 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. some prime subject of thought and study, I do not of course mean that every man must be a speciahst. A speciahst, in the strict sense of the term, is a man who has so used up both his powers and his mental interests in one specific direction as to weaken his capacity for all other objects, and to narrow his mental range. A study prosecuted so exclusively weakens the judgment for all else. A leading subject, but not an exclusive subject, is wanted, and this will be found to strengthen the judgment for all else. In the moral region, again, the permanent centre of all our thought and activity, which is God, so far from narrowing, expands the growing man. The central idea is like a sun, under which the whole being lives and grows, and from which each individual part draws warmth and strength. Culture without this centre is the depravation of a great idea, and has no object higher than self Self can form no true centre to self Moral Culture, further, must not only find its centre outside of self in God, but it must express itself in action if it is to live. It is a misuse of terms to call f/ia/ culture which, labouring under the baleful influence of self-worship, has forgotten that power can fulfil itself only in action. With some minds of strong aesthetic proclivities, culture issues in a kind of paralysis of judgment. The soul floats in the dim and dreamy potentialities of .sentiment. The man of this kind of culture indulges himself in the perpetual contemplation of himself and his surroundings, is frequently distinguished for a spurious amiability, THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 3/ nourishes feeling in a self-imposed retirement from the duties of citizenship, occupies himself with the contemplation of his own refined sensibilities, ever repeating to Himself the words which Cicero puts into the mouth of the god of Epicurus, " Mihi pulchre est : ego beatus sum." This result indeed is the very Nemesis of culture which has lost its way. This is the fate of the literary no less than of the religious recluse. Depend upon it, Nature, which is strong and virile, will have none of this : it demands the active manifestation of such power as we have, in expressed thought or living deed. Thus then only does moral culture reach its true aim by first center- ing itself in God, and next by forgetting itself in action. Culture, then, which we may accept as an ex- pression for the sum of the end of Education in respect of content, as distinguished from the end of education with respect to form (which end is Power), is the harmonious growing of all that is in man ; as a harmonious growing of intellect it demands a prime intellectual study, but discourages specialism ; as a harmonious and therefore balanced growing of the moral life, it must have a centre round which it may balance itself other than itself, and that centre of truth and reality is God, the source and sustainer of life, the beginning and the end of human endeavour : finally, as a living and wholesome as well as a harmonious growing, it has to seek the very con- ditions of its existence outside itself in action. It 38 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. finds in the opportunities of life at once its nourish- ment, the conditions of its vitality, and the measure of its soundness. It lives neither from itself, in itself, nor to itself. Culture thus interpreted is not, you will at once see, unpractical in its aims in the hands of the educationalist. For we find that it cannot be truly promoted save by ever keeping in view the practical issue of all training — the rearing of a religious people, and the preparation of youth for social duty and for the service of humanity, whereby alone they can truly serve and fulfil themselves. In its practical re- lations to the science and art of education, the term will be found pregnant with instruction as regards method also. For in the intellectual sphere, as we have seen, it enjoins unity of purpose as opposed to fragmentary encyclopzedism, and in the moral sphere the need of the Religious idea and the con- ception of social duty, without which all our moral sentiment and moral discipline would be jointless and invertebrate. The educational sceptic will say, " These be brave words : what has this culture to do with the educa- tion of the masses ? " I might reply that I deal Jicre with education, and not merely with the education of those whose school-time ends at twelve or thirteen years of age ; but I do not choose to take refuge in a reply which would involve me in the confession that the education of one class of the community is essentially unlike that of another, and has different THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 39 aims. Were it so there would be no unity in the idea of education — and this is to say that there is no idea of education at all. The thread of intellectual discipline, of moral purpose, and of culture runs through all education alike. The end is the same and the processes are the same. The seed which we sow in the humblest village school, and the tender plant which there, through many obstacles, forces itself into the light by the help of the skilled hand of the village schoolmistress, are not different in kind from the seed and the plant which in more favourable soil and by force of a higher organization grow up into a Leibnitz or a Bacon. To some extent indeed we may say that education is at every stage complete in its idea and uniform in its methods. It is with a process, not a consummation, that the teacher has to do, and with an unfinished process that he has always to be content. With every individual soul he has to deal as with a being that lives for ever, and that may carry forward its growth and the impulse he gives it after this brief life is past. It is only when we commit the vulgar error of confounding growth of soul with intellectual acquisition that we depreciate the possible results of primary education. The experience of us all testifies to this and justifies and sustains our loftiest hopes. Have we not all seen the highest ends of education attained in lives limited in their scope, brief in their duration, and barren of opportunity ? " In small proportions we just beauty see, And in short measures life may perfect be." 40 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. Having thus set before you the twofold end of education in respect of form and of content, — power and culture, our next duty, in working out a theory of education, is to follow the secret inner movements of Mind whereby it reaches these ends. It is precisely at this point in the process of our thought that a new consideration is forced on us. For we find that the formal processes that tend to discipline and power and the processes that tend to culture cross and recross each other. This is explained by the fact that while it is necessary, for purposes of exact thought, to distinguish the formal and the real, these two are in truth one in a concrete third notion. Culture without the presence of a dominant and regulative inner power is impossible ; on the other hand, an inner regulative power, save as the centre of an abundant material of cognitions and emotions ranged and co-ordinated under supreme and governing principles, is an empty ab- straction. The two unite together in the Ethical life. The more or less of knowledge or of faculty is a small matter ; the Ethical life is all in all. It is because the formal and real are in truth one in their issue that we find it impossible, save in a very rough way, to separate the processes of the growth of power, which are disciplinal, and the steps of the growth of culture, which arc the real in knowledge. By fixing their attention too much on one side or the other, men take a partial view of education, and partial opinions are apt to degenerate into partisan views. The true con- ception of education is a conciliation of both ; but it is THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 4I governed by the formal and not by the real element. The distinguishing characteristic of man is that, while he is of Nature, he is also above and outside. Nature. By Will it is that man is what he is. In my estimate, therefore, of the comparative claims of the disciplinal and the real in educating, priority is to be assigned to the former. It will be at once evident that the side from which we regard the idea of education will determine the value which we attach to particular studies, and the methods of intellectual and moral training which we shall most affect. But when we pass from the general consideration of the formal and the real elements in education, and the part which each plays in the pro- duction of that unity " of a completely fashioned Will," which is the goal of our labours, and descend to the mental processes themselves whereby intellectual and moral elements are taken into the structure of the life of a rational being and contribute to its organic growth, we are on ground common to all. In this field of inquiry, as in every other, we are but the ministers and interpreters of nature. The subtle processes whereby the moral and intellectual life of man is built up are in truth processes of education. To trace these is a difficult task, and one in which we cannot hope wholly to succeed. But we may go on in full faith that there is a ivay in which Nature works by moral and intellectual discipline to the growth of power, and by knowledge to the growth of culture. The analysis 42 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. which we institute to ascertain this way is not in- fluenced by our philosophical conceptions : it is simply a question of fact. On this analysis rests the whole system of Methods of instruction and of school-keeping, which ought to constitute at least one half of the course of instruction given from this place. In the sphere of the Understanding, for example, by w^hat cunning process does intelligence take to itself the materials of its life ? A matter this of great importance ; for the determination of the different stages of the growth of the understanding determines at the same time the period at which the various subjects of instruction, and the diverse aspects of these, are to be represented to the child, the boy, and the youth respectively, in such a way as to ensure assimilation. For it is by assimi- lation only that true growth is possible ; all else is mere acquisition, and so far from being education, it is not even instruction. On this subject, as indeed on all questions of methodology, we shall learn most from infant schools. It is in the teaching of the elements of knowledge that the art of teaching chiefly reveals itself. The title which Sturm gives to one of his treatises ought to stand at the head of all books on Method, viz., " Dc ludis litcrarum recte apericndis." In the Moral sphere, again, we encounter difiiculties of method much more grave. We have here to tread delicately and warily. The question of times and ways is a vital one. We readily perceive the folly of presenting the whole of knowledge in mass and at THE TRAININ'G OF THE TEACHER. 43 once to a child's understanding, and yet we do not hesitate to put at once before him the complex sum of moral and religious doctrine and precepts, in the hope of producing thereby a living result. The ideas of religion and the principles and precepts of morality must follow experience, accompany intellectual growth, and wait even on the activity of the imagination. The educator will approach this portion of his task with much earnestness and some fear. He has to shape and to inspire a human soul, full of sensibility, alive to the lightest touch, quickly responsive to every appeal of love and every word of hate. " A mother's scream," says Jean Paul, "w^ill resound through the whole future life of a child ; " and do we not know that the memory of a mother's tenderness lives for ever ? Let not the instructor of youth imagine that he has no concern with what may be called the refinements and subtleties of moral training. If he does so, his psychology is fundamentally unsound. Even in little things the teacher must seek and find his opportunity. Les petites morales of good personal habits and of good manners are to him by no means trivial. They con- stitute frequently the only way in which he can apply to the ordinary acts of the school-room and the play- ground the deeper truths which inspire his teaching ; and they are in the case of many childish natures the only way in which those deeper truths can be brought into consciousness as living and governing forces. They are the outer expression of an inner state, and by the cultivation of the outer expression we always 44 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. sustain the inner life ; nay, we sometimes evoke it when otherwise it would not emerge. Manners seem to be of sHght importance, but they are often of large import, and are not seldom convertible with morals, as the word itself was among the Romans. The Laureate speaks truly when he says : — "Manners are not idle, but the fniit Of loyal nature and of noble mixid." I have been speaking of intellectual and moral instruction and of intellectual and moral discipline ; but I would repeat that beyond and above both these, constituting the unity in which the two meet, is the Ethical life. This proposition — that the intellectual and moral substance of education, and intellectual and moral discipline, the formal and the real, are fused in the unity of the ethical life — it will be my business to explain and make good in the more philosophical portion of my course. You will then see, I trust, that the ethical function of the teacher cannot be pressed too far. It will appear also that it is the ethical element which is at the root of the manly and generous growth of boyhood, and the sole force which can permanently sustain even purely intellectual effort. All labour of the schoolmaster is of doubtful issue as regards the merely intellectual resultant in his pupils, but every act which is inspired by the ethical spirit has its sure intellectual as well as moral reward. It cannot possibly be wholly lost. Here the spiritual forces are on our side and continually make for us. THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 45 Indeed, if we have not this faith, we had better give the whole business up. Be it observed that the term " Ethical " is here used in the broad sense in which it comprehends Religion. It is the ethics of a religion which justify a creed before the world, and it is the religion of ethics which gives moral teaching a hold on the heart of man and a sure foundation in human reason. The morality of secularism has for its foundation self-interest, and for its sanction coercion ; it may preserve society ; but it is only when ethics are in union with religious con- ceptions, either passing into these or rising out of them, that they promote the true life of humanity. It is religion which affords to ethical science a basis in the infinite, and presents to the ethical life issues in the infinite. The question which next most presses for con- sideration is — What instruments or materials are most promotive of the end we propose to ourselves, viewed in the light of their ultimate unity in the ethical life ? \Vc have to select those instruments which by their nature contribute most, and most surely, to the supreme end of all our endeavours. By this measure we must mete the instruments which the present state of know- ledge offers us. It is impossible, and were it possible it would be undesirable, and destructive of all sound discipline, to teach even the beginnings of every sub- ject. But it ought not to be difficult to adjust the rival claims of Literature (including under this head 46 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. Languages, Ancient and Modern), Science, and JEs- thetics. The philosophy of education is a poor affair if it cannot, out of the materials which are clamant for attention in the school-room because of their im- mediate use in the work of life, and as essential pre- requisites of ethical activity, find apt instruments for its purpose. Such questions are of great importance to the well-being of society. If primary instruction, for example, must exclude from its curriculum science, in any strict sense of the term, can there be any doubt that our daily instruction should be so contrived as to place a child in intelligent relations with the world in which he lives, and to enable him to look with the eye of reason, and not of the brute, on the phenomena of the physical universe ? Still less is there room for doubt, it seems to me, that the elements and applica- tions of the laws of health and of social economy should enter into every scheme of instruction. It is through these subjects indeed that we shall at once rectify the conceptions of the pupil as to the sphere of duty in which God has placed him, and give direction, significance, and practical force to our moral teaching. In the secondary stage of education, again — that which immediately precedes University discipline, — the place to be assigned to Latin and Greek must be largely determined by what we mean when we name these studies. If such instruction resolves itself into mere memory-work and gerund-grinding, it is even then not without educative uses, but it must make way and that quickly, for other and better disciplines. THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 4/ If, however, it is so employed as to be an exercise of the inductive and deductive processes ; if the study of words and sentences be an unconscious study of thought, and if they become, as boys advance, a study of form and an introduction to the pregnant and elevating idea of Art ; if the embalmed thoughts be truly made to breathe and the dead words to burn, then indeed we have here an instrument of unsur- passed and unsurpassable excellence. It is true that the rich records of modern life and literature now yield us much of the culture we seek in antiquity, but we cannot afford to dispel the halo which gathers round the remote past, and the deeds of the men who have gone before us. Imagination here, by idealizing, sustains morality, and is also the spur of the intellect. Still less can we afford to part with the impersonal and objective character of the teachings of Judaea, Greece, and Rome, and to substitute for them the subjective and partisan lessons of modern life. On the whole, I feel wath Jean Paul, who says, " The present ranks of humanity would sink irrecoverably if youth did not take its way through the silent temple of the mighty past, into the busy market-place of life." But even after all this is said, and more than this, it is an anachronism to give such studies exclusive posses- sion of the field. In the present state of knowledge, not more than half the school-time should, it seems to me, be given to ancient studies, even in the upper classes of professedly classical schools ; and not all boys should be even thus far restricted. It is a dis- 48 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. credit to our great Educational Institutions that any boy of seventeen should be in ignorance of such things as the elements of Physics and Physiology. As yet, except when alluding briefly to the con- ditions of power, I have been talking of the education of man as if I were speaking of spirits in a world of spirits. From birth to death, however, Man is subject to external circumstances which are for the most part too mighty for him. He seems to rise out of a physical organization : it is the outer w^hich at first evokes his slumbering consciousness at birth, and the outer conquers him in death. With these physical conditions of existence he has to effect a compromise. All his receptivity and all his activity is in and through mortal brain and muscle. All his moral and intellectual activity must therefore be carried on with due regard to the external instrument which he must employ. In the treatment of the subject of education it is not necessary to profess any theory of the relation between mind and body. But this we know, that the former, both in its sensi- bilities and activities, is bound up with the natural laws of the latter, and to those laws it must conform, or fail itself to live. The theoretical question of the identification of thought and emotion with nerve-processes is simply one part of a much larger question, the relation of Nature itself to Mind. Evade it as we may, encumber it as wc may with irrelcxant and side issues, the ques- THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 49 tion is really this : Are thought and personality the product of natural force, or are natural forces them- selves the product of thought and personality ? Spenser says : — " Of the soul the body form doth take, For soul is form and doth the body make." Now this, as other cognate questions, cannot, of course, be from this Chair treated critically. The critical and historical investigation of all such subjects is otherwise provided for. I must in all such matters assume a purely dogmatic position, and with dogma you must be here content. The advance of Physi- ology into the sphere of Psychology has been viewed by many of the older and purely introspective school with unnecessary alarm. It is a mistake to suppose that the Physiology of Mind necessarily teaches a materialistic theory of intelligence. This is often assumed ; but there is no necessary connection be- tween the two. The ph}-siology of Mind is merely the study of those material processes in which sensa- tion and inteUigence and even moral emotion are involved, and which at once condition consciousness and are conditioned by it. It is an important auxiliary to the study of Mind, but can never occupy the ground of the older Psychology. In every step of its processes it demands a reflection on consciousness, and an analysis of the life and phenomena of consciousness, to give it significance — nay, even to render its results intelligible. If, again, we entirely change our point of departure in self, and look at self and all that we call £ 50 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. Mind from an outside position as a mere product of physical forces, as a function of matter, we are then on longer dealing with a merely psychological question, but, as I have already indicated, with a part of the larger cosmical question — the origination of all things ; and by our conclusions as to this larger inquiry, the subordinate, yet to us all-important subject, must be determined. We shall probably find that the only effectual answer to the proposition " All is Nature," is the counter proposition " All is Mind." He alone can entertain the thought of Mindless man who has first taken to his bosom the withering thought of Godless Nature. However this may be, we may, as students of education, assume that Mind works under physical conditions. Every sensation, every emotion, every act of memory, every act of thought, is effected through brain, and involves a certain process and a certain ex- haustion of substance. The proper nutrition of brain, consequently, with a view to the repair of waste, must ever be with educationalists a matter of prime con- sideration. The effects of overstraining or of defective nutritive process arc in their practical relations vital. I am sufficiently well aware of the necessity of fresh air and clean skins, and spacious well-drained school- rooms, but these and other physical questions are all subsidiary to the consideration of the demands which the life of sensibility, emotion, will, and thought make on the brain. Here Physiology holds up the finger of warning. But instructive as the negative teachings of I THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER, 5 I Physiology are, the positive contributions which it has to make to the philosophy of education are even more valuable. The intimate connection subsisting between states of consciousness and cerebral changes, and the relation of these, when repeated, to what may be called the " set " of the nerve-apparatus, bring to view with a vividness which is beyond the reach of the ordinary psychology, the manner of the formation of habits of feeling, thought, and action. Indeed there is nothing more encouraging to the earnest teacher than the study of the Physiology of Habit. It will now be more clearly apparent why I selected the word " Power " to denote the formal end of Edu- cation. It is preferable to Will, because this has to do rather with moral and intellectual relations re- garded purely as such. When an active and free, self-determining, ever-ready will is aided by those physical conditions which determine the healthful activity of all the bodily organs, so that they respond willingly to the demands made on them, we have a complex state before us. There is a natural volition, the issue of mere life and health in our physical frame, which bounds forward to ally itself with the movement of intelligent Will, and gives to the latter a certain steadiness and self-assurance. To this combination of free will with the gladly co-operating volition of the bodily organization we assign the name of Poiver. It would appear, from what has been said, that in dealing with Education we touch various departments 52 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. of knowledge, but there is little danger of our wander- ing : for the fixing of the ends of education will at once impose a limit on our studies, and give stability to them. It will protect us both from vague specula- tion and from tedious detail. To enter into questions of philosophy, is so far from being incumbent on us that to do so would be to defeat the specific objects for which this Chair has been founded. The considera- tion of these questions has been already provided for in the University curriculum. But while the Professor must here, as representing a practical subject, avoid all speculation, he must yet find some dogmatic philo- sophic basis as a support for his thought, if his teach- ing is not to be an aggregate of disjointed essays. In Psychology and Physiology he must lay his founda- tions ; but from these departments of knowledge he will select only such materials as have a direct bearing on education, and give significance and the force of law to educational ends, processes, and methods. This portion of our course has to be treated in detail as belonging to the Art of Teaching, and will necessarily occupy much of our attention. It will be illustrated by model lessons, and by observation of the procedure of the best schools. The means of obtaining practice in teaching will also, it is hoped, be provided. Thus informed as to the ends and philosophy of Education and the rational grounds of pedagogic methods, we shall then find ourselves in a good THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 53 position for surveying History. As we read the records of the past we shall see that education by and in the family, was early overpowered by the education of the tribe, and finally of the State. In the earliest stages of society, while man was yet struggling for subsistence, education could only mean the fitting of a man to secure for himself the necessary protection and food ; nor is this primary necessity ever to be lost sight of as the basis of all educational systems, even among the most cultivated nations. As society advances, division of labour and the rudiments of professions extend the sphere of human life and the conception which the more thoughtful form of man's capabilities, needs, duties, and destiny. Religion, Law, and Medicine become gateways of speculation ; and through specu- lation it is that humanity has been enabled to rise. Speculation may be said to begin when knowledge for its own sake becomes an object of pure desire, and man becomes an object of interest and wonder to man. As soon as men surmise their own greatness, apprehend that each is valuable not only for what he can do, but for what he is, and that man does not live by bread alone, the idea of Culture enters — which contemplates the growth of man to the full stature of his race. In the educational history of ancient nations, especially of Greece and of Rome, we shall see these ideas take form. The process of historical evolution will thus furnish a continual illustration of the Philosophy of education, and while guarding us 54 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. against the errors of other times, recall to us great ideas which we are apt to push rudely aside with the vulgar self-assurance that distinguishes a mechanical age, oblivious of the debts it owes to the past, and ignoring its moral inheritance. We shall find, too, much instruction from the study of the educational organization of other countries, and much encouragement from the study, in their historical connection, of the systems of those who have been eminent as educational reformers. Those systems are generally full of suggestive material, even when their leading ideas must be pronounced partial and in- adequate. I have now endeavoured to vindicate, as fully as our limits permit, the position of this Chair in an Academic curriculum, and to indicate the nature of the instruction which it proposes to give to those fitting themselves for the work of the school. It seems to me that if the future teacher of the higher class of public schools be carried through such a course, he will not merely be better fitted for his professional work than now, but be personally benefited by the mental dis- cipline which the curriculum will afford. Going forth to the duties of active life instructed in the ends, pro- cesses, and history of Education, he will not work blindly, but connecting his daily duties with the philo- sophy of man, he will see all methods of instruction in their rational grounds ; and allying himself with the long history of his profession, he will regard with that THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 55 self-respect, which is alien to self-conceit, his position as the responsible distributor, within his sphere,' of the accumulated knowledge and civilization of his time. Going forth, too, with an inspiring motive suggested by the ethical end towards which all his labour tends, he will carry with him the moral fervour which we demand of a minister of sacred things. All instruction, all discipline will be truly valuable in his eyes only in so far as they subserve that ultimate ethical purpose in which the form and content of education finally unite. Set apart to educate children for the State — whatever instruments he may use, whatever methods he may pursue — this purpose will ever be present to his thought, exalting his Hfe and sustaining his ac- 'tivity. It is only by labouring towards this end that he can fitly discharge his special function in society, find a certain reward even in partial success, and, in the words of Milton, " store up for himself the good provision of peaceful hours." What is it to him that he should teach this or that particular subject if he fail to build up and elevate the whole humanity of his pupils ! And should he pursue any other purpose than this, and pursue it even with apparent success, what will be the result in the generations that are to follow ? A mere sharpening of the wits of men, but no wit to find the true way. " What an infinite mock is this," says Shakespeare, " that a man should have the best use of his eyes to see the way of blindness ! " In conclusion, let me say that if the teacher can be led to rise to the full conception of his task, and to 56 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. understand that he is in truth one of the great moral forces of society, one of the conservators of civilization, he will be among the first to resist all attempts to divorce his daily work from the ethical and religious life of his time. This follows from the idea of educa- tion and of the educator's function, which I have endeavoured to set forth. He will at once see that so to divorce him is to throw him out of all relation to the true humanity of the past and of the future, and to abrogate that which is at once his highest duty and greatest privilege. He will feel that if he accepts restriction to the secular, he must be content to forego the full measure of the social respect and State-con- sideration which are rightfully his due. Ordained to the priesthood of the school, and held by society to be so ordained, he will not find it necessary to clamour for a social recognition which will be freely accorded to him whose office it is, in the words of Tennyson, " . . . to rear, to teach ; Becoming as is meet and fit, A link among the days to knit The generations each with each." If men can be sent forth from the University for the service of their country, so equipped and so in- spired, the Chair of Education will have made good its claim to a place in the Academic curriculum, and the objects of the Founders will be attained. THE PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION IN ITS RELATION TO THE SCHOOL AND THE TEACHER.* Now that the external organization of education has made considerable way in most civilized countries, the minds of men are free to consider the uses to which the machinery is to be applied. The mere acquisition of a certain facility in reading and writing and casting accounts can scarcely be held to justify the present large outlay of wealth and energy. It is only if education is deliberately aimed at as essentially an ethical task, that social reformers will find their higlTesI""Tropes of the school realized. Be this as it may, it is evident that the Philosophy of Education now comes to the front and demands consideration. I assume that the education of a country is deter- mined by its philosophy ; but I use the word philo- sophy in the larger sense as denoting the beliefs of a period, whether reasoned out or not, regarding man, his nature, his social relations, and his destiny. Philo- sophy in the narrower sense as applied to education * From the Frincctoti Review. 58 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. is, strictly speaking, only psychology, and determines the periods of mental growth in the individual, and methods of instruction as these are indicated by a study of the processes of mind. In this more re- stricted sense also the education of a country is determined by its philosophy. The saying of Aristotle, that it is not in man's option whether he will philo- sophize or not, but that he uuist philosophize, is especially true in the sphere of the school. If this be so, it becomes a matter of no small importance that those concerned with education should deliberately and consciously philosophize, in order that they may define their aim as well as their methods. We hold that a training in philosophy, both in its larger and narrower sense, is necessary for those members of the community whose special function it is to rear and teach the youth of the country : not for all, it may be, but certainly for the more select portion who influence the general body. I am well aware that the eminent men who have left their mark on the education of the past have owed their influence mainly to some profound religious or moral impulse and not to any philosophical system. This is true alike of pre-Christian philosopher, Christian pietist, and utilitarian moralist. Nor indeed can any teacher or director of education be held to occupy a place that fits him, if he finds himself discharging the functions of an instructor of youth or a superintendent of schools, unsupported, undirected, and unconsoled in his daily task by a moral or religious purpose. THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 59 Such a man has missed his vocation. And yet we cannot afford to dispense with the services of many men who lack this professional qualification. We cannot afford to close the ranks of the teaching pro- fession against all save those whose true vocation it is. The ministry of the school, like the ministry of the church, must be content often to use weapons of inferior temper. For every three millions of the population we need about five thousand teachers, excluding those in the higher seats of learning and private governesses and tutors. To expect to find so large a number of devout, zealous, sympathetic, child-loving men and women as this, is a fond imagination. All the more difficult is it to command an adequate supply of this class, that the church attracts into its ranks by a prior claim so large a proportion of the men of enthusiastic temper and ideal aims. Luther's dictum, that had he not been a preacher he would have been a teacher, is still the most that any will say. It showed Luther's penetration that he said even so much at a time when the school was so misunderstood and misprized. " I know," he says, " that this work, next to the office of preacher, is the most profitable, the greatest, and the best. Nay, I know not even which is the better of the two. For it is hard to make old dogs tame and old rogues upright ; at which task, nevertheless, the preacher's office labours and often labours in vain. For young trees be more easily bent and trained howbeit some should break in the effort. Beloved, count it one of the highest virtues upon earth to educate faith- 60 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. fully the children of others, which so few, and scarcely any, do by their own." By these words, by his earnest appeals to the civil magistracy to care for the edu- cation, not of the few but of the many, and by the share he took in reorganizing schools, Luther con- nected the education of the young indissolubly with the aim and method of the Protestant Reformation. Nor were his companions and followers slow to recog- nize the significance of their master's words. Erasmus, Melanchthon, and Knox were full of the enthusiasm of the educator ; and John Sturm practically exhibited at his renowned institution in Strasburg what the school could be made, even with the limited materials then at its command. Ideas, however, are slow of transforming themselves into practical facts. The day is probably still distant when the words of Luther will be reversed, and men who feel called to labour for the moral and spiritual good of their fellow-men will say, " If I must relinquish the office of teacher, I would be a preacher ; " and yet this is, after all, only the logical conclusion of Luther's own argument. As things actually are, however, it is vain, we repeat, to think that we can recruit the ranks of the teaching profession with men and women who are conscious that they have a " message " to children and youths ; and the question accordingly becomes an urgent one. How can we create zeal tempered with judgment, judgment moved by zeal ? how can the ideal aims and the skilled methods of the few be conveyed into the rank and file of the profession — the multitude of THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 6l uninspired, but we may presume conscientious, workers who, from various causes, find themselves engaged in the duties of the school-room ? Even second-hand inspiration is a great gain to the community. If we could fill all the teachers of our children with a lofty motive and supply them with a sound method of procedure, we should certainly do more to dignify their own lives, and to sustain the moral vigour and soundness of the whole nation through their agency, than by any other means. This is truly a great question — a question for States and for Councils, and one which it is especially incumbent on Universities, as the teachers of teachers, to take up and carry to an issue. The thoughtful student of education in its national relations may at once start an objection to the view of the schoolmaster's function we have indicated, in which there is unhappily some truth. He will say that, " if education, as distinct from mere instruction, be essentially spiritual in its motives and aims, the conflicting views of religious truth and practice that are prevalent make it impossible for any State to give effect to such a conception without trenching on the liberty of individual citizens. The logical issue, in the sphere of practical politics, of such a divided state of opinion is a subversion of education altogether in any true or spiritual sense, and involves the limitation of it to the work of disciplining intelligence and con- veying such information as may be of practical utility in the work of life. To this, it is true, may be added 62 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. such instruction in practical moralities as will rear good citizens : but this is all." Even if we accepted this limited conception of the work of the school, we should still find room for the educational element. But we are not disposed to accept it. It is true that religious differences exist, but they are differences largely ecclesiastical and partly theological. There is little difference of opinion as to what constitutes the Christian life ; and it is the life, not the forms of theological dogma, with which the school-teacher has chiefly to do. In the present state of religious parties it has been found necessary, in some countries at least, to relegate detailed dogmatic instruction to the churches, or to organizations set on foot and controlled by them. But it is not a sound conclusion from this unhappy necessity that a schoolmaster of truly religious temper is not at liberty even in those countries to assume distinctively Christian doctrine, and, by help of this silent assumption, to raise his intellectual and moral teaching into a spiritual sphere. He may animate all he does with the religious principles and aspirations that control his own life, and he will thereby give ethical significance to his daily task. Of this we may be assured, that it is impossible to sustain moral in- struction at a high level or to give to it its true mean- ing in relation to the life and destiny of a human being, if it be not fused into one whole with the emotion and passion which can be drawn from the spiritual and religious life alone. Nay, without this spiritual element it might easily be shown that there THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 63 can be no true ethical discipline. Even the teacher who finds it necessary to confine himself to bald moralities, because, having lost his own way, he has denied the divine life and taken refuge in agnosticism, has to resort to the " enthusiasm of humanity " as a source of inspiration, if he is to be more than a mere machine. This itself serves as a kind of religion — spurious it is true, but yet giving forth a certain warmth to sustain the worker, and a light which, though flickering and unstable, yet serves in some sort to steady his uncertain steps. At best, it is a light that rules the night and borrows all it has of virtue from the true sun that makes the day. Men of this type of mind, however, rarely take to school- work, either in Great Britain or America ; nor is it desirable they should. An instructor of youth ought to find himself in substantial accord with the religious life of the people among whom he works. Nor is it often otherwise. But the spiritual aim is not enough. A certain mould of character is needed. The heaven-born teacher is, like the poet, rare. He must exhibit the authority of law, and this is never arbitrary, but always calm, equable, just. Rigid as maintainer of law, his judgments, and still more his penalties, must yet lean to mercy's side. He must possess that humility of mind which makes him reverence the spirits of children, as purer than his own, and as full of spiritual possibilities, which for himself, it may be, are prematurely foreclosed. He must be endowed 64 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. with a sympathetic power allied to genius, whereby he may be able daily to be himself a child, to under- stand the failures and perversities of unformed wills, and the efforts and blunderings of travailing intelli- gences. His manner must be direct, candid, sincere, and friendly, yet, withal, suggestive of high purpose and unbending law. He must dominate his school as its presiding genius, its spiritual standard, its type of culture ; and yet he must be a child among children, a boy among boys, a youth among youths. Where are we to find men in whom opposites are thus reconciled, and whose hearts at the same time are alive with a love of humanity and glow with a religious zeal — men " moulded by God," as Thomas Fuller says — for a schoolmaster's life? It is precisely because we cannot hope to find them in any large numbers that there is imposed on us the duty of de- vising some means of bringing young men and women, whose habit of mind or tendency of nature leads them to devote themselves to the education of others, under the guiding influence of older men who can inspire them with the true aims of the educator and the methods by which these can best be attained. Aspi- rants of the finer temper will quickly perceive under such guidance the truly spiritual task of the teacher ; and the duller minds will, by the exhibition of the philosophy or rationale of education, be at least intellectually guided, if not also morally inspired, to form an adequate conception of their function in the community. They will go forth furnished with ideals THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 6$ and methods which cannot fail to influence and direct their professional activity. It is in the philosophy of human nature as applied to the growth of mind and body, that \vc find not merely a scientific basis for the teacher's work, but also a means of evoking and even creating the true spirit of the educator. Philosophy offers him a rationalized conception of the ends and aims of the life of man which carries conviction as reasoned truth. The possession of this, even if there were nothing else, would be a great gain to future schoolmasters. The practical relation of the philosophy he studies and accepts to the subjects, methods, and organization of instruction, and, above all, to the method of moral training, throws the light of science on what would otherwise be at best em- pirical rules. The instruction of the normal school in methods is good in its place and way, but all empirical methodology, while failing to elevate the teacher, binds him down and makes him a pedant : philosophical methodology, on the other hand, especially if enriched with the history of education, gives him the freedom and liberty of the spirit. Any other view than that which we here advocate of the schoolmaster's training rests on the opinion either that teaching is an instinct or knack and that there is consequently neither a science nor a teachable method of education ; or that the schoolmaster's duty is one of instruction only, and that the acquisition of good methods of instruction is a sufficient, and the only practicable, preparation. The former opinion F 66 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. we may in these days pass by as dead. The latter is bound up with the larger question of a schoolmaster's vocation. But even assuming that a knowledge of methods of instruction is an adequate preparation, it is easy to show that these must be wooden and inflexible if they rest on empiricism, or are dog- matically taught, and that they are incapable of being rationalized save on the assumption of a definite philosophy of mind. Philosophy tests and checks, while it explains, methods, and thus raises the teacher out of the ruts of traditionalism and the " customs of the trade." It transforms him, indeed, from a trades- man into the member of a profession, and nothing else can do so. If to his philosophical understanding of method he adds that higher view of his calling which entitles him to the name of educator, and endeavours to widen his philosophy so as to cover the larger sphere, the public voice will assign him his true place in the social system ; and that will be a place that will satisfy every legitimate ambition. He will be measured, in truth, by his own standard of his own work. We demur to the opinion that because a master is departmental only, as must generally be the case in high-schools, his sphere is limited by the subjects in which he instructs. To the head-master doubtless specially belongs the general discipline and educative character of the school ; but he will be powerless unless each of his departmental assistants understand his disciplinary aim and assist him in giving effect to it. This thorough accord between THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 6/ heads and assistants will certainly be secured when each has studied the philosophy of his art and so found common ground of action, and does not, as now, accept customs and rules that are merely arbitrary and capricious and do not affiliate themselves to sound and rationalized methods. The hardness and self-complacency that charac- terize the men whose arbitrary caprice or inherited dogmatism determines what they shall do and how they shall do it, has given us the " dominie " of tradition, and has served to perpetuate the feeling that schoolmaster and slave are still, as in Roman times, almost interchangeable terms. We venture to affirm that it is very seldom that a man of cultivation cares to sustain a conversation with a thorough school- master even in these our days, unless the latter happen to be a man whose original researches or literary occupations have made him something more than a mere schoolmaster. Nothing can change this, we are convinced, save the clear acceptance, by the whole body of schoolmasters, of education and not mere instruction as their function, and such a philo- sophic study of their subject as will justify them in making so high a claim. The whole race of masters in the public schools of England have risen in social estimation since Arnold of Rugby's time. And this not alone by the reflection on the whole body of the fame of Arnold, but because they have largely, through the Rugby influence, been animated by a deeper moral spirit in their work. When they advance still 68 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. further, and, in a spirit of reality, accept the whole education of the boy as their task, and seek to en- lighten their methods with a philosophy which interprets the word education for them, their position will be second to that of no profession. The ablest minds may then, perchance, be attracted to a work so potent in its influence on the destinies of their country. We do not desire to create mere enthusiasts. Undirected and uncontrolled enthusiasm burns out, and leaves only ashes behind. The genuine enthu- siast always subjects himself to law if his work is to be effective and permanent. The fierce heat of the sun itself attains its ends in the domain of nature by working according to the law of each kind. Where it does not do this, it destroys. So with the fire of the educational enthusiast. We desire to see the ardour of the youthful schoolmaster so founded on principle -and controlled by intellectual purpose that it will last a lifetime ; and this is possible only by timely subjection to the order and law which philo- sophy alone can give. To the question. How comes it that a subject so important in its bearings on the well-being of the State has received such tardy recognition ? the answer is easy. If the duty of educating the masses of the people has been of such slow growth as to have taken practical shape in a country such as England only within the last few years, we can scarcely be surprised that the philosophy of education has still to struggle for a place. State necessities must long forerun State THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 69 ideals. The recent institution of chairs of the Insti- tutes and History of Education in the Scottish Uni- versities of Edinburgh and St. Andrew although the work of private hands, indicates an acceptance by these seats of learning of the duty they owe to the education of the people, which must erelong influence other universities, and through them the statesmen who guide national education both in England and America. Already the question has been under the consideration of the ancient University of Oxford, while at Cambridge the founding of lectureships, which will erelong, we hope, become professorships, has been already resolved upon. While the primary education of the people was in arrear it was inevitable that the philosophy of educa- tion should stand still. It is only when the machinery of a nation's education has been set up that the question of the best application of that machinery presses. Again, it is in the primary school that educational aim and method most distinctly force themselves on our attention. It is chiefly in the initiation of the human mind to knowledge, and in the formation of the still plastic character of child- hood, that questions of aim and method suggest themselves for solution. When solved in this sphere they are solved also for the higher stages of secondary and university instruction. The upper schools of a country will be insensibly moulded by the aims and methods of the people's schools, and are already being so moulded. ^0 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. Another obstacle in the way of the recognition of the philosophy of education as a subject within the range of practical politics has been the backward state of the science of psychology. A glance at history will satisfy us that a close connection subsists between psychology and solid advances in education. The crude and generalized psychology of ancient Greece was boldly applied by Xenophon, Plato, and Aristotle to education. They regarded this subject as a vital part of political philosophy, and they applied their psychology, such as it was, with brilliant success. But their views on education, admirable as they are, were necessarily restricted by their p.sychology, and by their conception of the aim and destiny of man and of the State. Plato's Republic, while containing his most matured views on philosophical questions and on the idea of a State, is also a treatise on educa- tion. It is not, however, a treatise on method, but rather on the general aims of education in which the Doric and Ionic ideas are woven together into a unity by philosophy. For four centuries the opinions of Plato and Aristotle on education governed the civilized world, and it was not till the eminent Roman teacher Ouintilian recorded his experience and practice- that an)^ marked step in advance was taken. Quin- tilian's book is in marked contrast to Plato's. It is not a philosophical speculation, but rather a treatise on method from the hand of a practical schoolmaster. As the first book on method, it marks an epoch. When education again passed into the hands of the THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 7 1 Christian Church, instructions in the new doctrine of Christ and his apostles became naturally the main end. The individual had now an infinite value in himself as an immortal spirit, and the natural con- sequence of this novel thought would probably have been a great movement in the interests of popular education had the state of society admitted of it. The methods of instruction practised in the monastery schools for a thousand years degenerated grievously because there was no philosophy and no method. We cannot imagine that this would have happened had the " Institutions " of Ouintilian not been, during all that period, lost. It was only at the time of the Reformation that an interest in methods of instruction began again to show itself, among the Jesuits on the one hand, and the Reformers on the other. Even the indifferent and sceptical mind of Montaigne saw that the " greatest and most important problem of human science was the rearing and education of children." But the attention which the Reformers directed to educational method was soon relaxed, notwithstanding the labours of Melancthon, Dean Colet, Roger Ascham, and Sturm. Roger Ascham's " Scholemaster," written in the time of Elizabeth, had not effected much, admir- able as it was as a school guide and as a specimen of literary execution. It was not a philosophical treatise, but, like Ouintilian's " Institutions," a book on method only. It was the application of vigorous English common-sense to the work which the teacher had to do ; and allowing for some defects and for occasional ^2 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. exaggeration and over-sanguineness of expectation, it still remains a book which is full of instruction for the modem teacher of language. Yet the English peda- gogic world was content to drop it out of mind, and to go on by " rule of thumb," suicidally proclaiming that their work was neither a science nor an art, and that they themselves consequently were only boy- drivers and dominies. With the Baconian movement came a new interest in psycholog}', and education began at last to ally itself formally with philosophy. The man who in 1604 gave expression to the commonly felt need of educational reform was Wolf- gang Ratich (Ratke), a native of Holstein, and the impulse which he gave we still feel. The \iews that he advocated, while suggested by a deep consideration of the need of education for the whole people and the consequent necessity of finding a universal method, were the fruit of a reaction against the domination of A\ords over things, and may easily be traced to the influence of Bacon and the " Xo\'um Organon." As knowledge of things was now, in the opinion of educa- tional reformers, to take the place of a knowledge of words, and as the new philosophy taught that it was by induction only that we could interpret nature, the watchwords of Ratich and his followers were, " Omnia per inductionem et experimentum," and again, " Ve- tustas cessit ; Ratio vicit" After the fashion of enthu- siasts, Ratich prosecuted his objects by worr),'ing all in authorit)-, and finally succeeded in getting his scheme remitted by the German Diet to certain pro- I THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 73 fessors in Giessen and Jena, to be reported on by them. The words they used in submitting their report are worth quoting, as containing the first authoritative statement known to us of the close con- nection that subsists between psychology and educa- tion. " It is not enough," they say, " that a man should carry on the work of instructor according to his own fancy and opinion of what is right, or in dependence on his native discretion and natural ability ; but to this work there belongs a special art, viz., the art of instruction, which no less than other arts has its fixed ground and assured rules ; and these arise not only out of the understanding, memory, sense, yea, out of the whole nature of man, but also out of the characteristics of languages, art, and sciences." When Ratich began his educational mission, the internal state of schools seems to have been little better than when ]Melancthon and Sturm effected such great improvements. There had been a relapse. Latin (with here and there a little Greek and arith- metic) was the sole instrument of instruction ; and even this was badly taught. Dreary generalizations of language rules, covering the whole field of grammar, including even exceptions, and all these written in barbarous Latin it>-, had to be committed to memory by the unhappy pupils. This, with the reading of Latin authors, but with little regard to the order of reading and with no attempt even at the literary and historical instruction which ought to have accompanied .the reading of these authors, constituted the school 74 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. curriculum. The literary humanistic culture which now mainly sustains Latin in its time-honoured place in the school does not seem to have been thought of. The wave of the Renaissance seems to have exhausted itself We do not propose to enter here into the system of Ratich, but as it was the first modern attempt at once to philosophize on the subject of education and to furnish a practical method, it is worth our while to summarize his leading positions. These w^ere : i. Everything according to the order and course of nature : for all teaching and learning which is contrary to nature and violent, is hurtful,, and w^-cakens nature. 2. Not more than one thing at a time ; for nothing is more obstructive to the progress of the understanding than learning many things together and at the same time. Therefore treat one thing thoroughly and then go on to another. Every language may be learned out of one author. 3. Repeat one thing often ; for what is often repeated is imprinted on the understanding deeply and thoroughly. Many things crossing one another con- fuse and overload the understanding. Here Ratich borrowed the Jesuit maxim, Repe^itio mater studiorwn. 4. Everything in the mother tongue first. The ad- vantage of this is, that the young learner has to think only of the things which he lias to learn- 5. Everything without coercion ; for through com- pulsion and blows we disgust youth with studies, so that they put themselves in an attitude of hostility towards them. It is also against nature. . . . The I THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 75 pupil should not be afraid of the master, but love him and hold him in honour ; and this happens if the master rightly discharges his office. 6. Nothing is to be learned by heart ; for much learning by heart detracts from the intelligence and acuteness. If a thing, being understood, is imprinted on the mind by frequent repetition, memory follows of its own accord. 7. Uniformity in all things, as well in what concerns the learning of an art as in the books used and the rules to be acquired. The grammars of the various languages should be as much alike as the differences of the languages admit of. 8. First, a thing in itself, and then the ivay of a thing. No njles till one has given the matter of the author and of the language. Rules without the materials on which the rules are based confuse the understanding. 9. '' Omnia per inductionem et experimentum." Without sub- scribing to all these canons, we yet recognize in them the outline of a complete scheme of method ; and we may find in them, moreover, the germ of all succeed- ing attempts to methodize the art of instruction. The defects of the Ratichian system consists in its too purely intellectual character, and in the shallow- ness of its philosophic basis. But he did not wholly neglect the educational, as distinct from the in- structional, part of his subject. His innovations in the matter of discipline, indeed, though somewhat whimsical, were in the right direction. To attract to learning rather than to coerce, was his aim ; and he was so anxious to preserve the purity of the intel- •J^ THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. lectual and moral relation between master and scholar, that one of his plans was to leave the discipline (in the sense of coercion) in the hands of a separate authority, whom he named the scholarch. The misery to which young humanity was in those days subject, and which seemed to be accepted as a necessary accompaniment of all learning, may be learned from many authorities, who confirm the words of Balthasar Schupp, Avritten when Ratich was approaching the end of his disappointed career. " I must confess," says Schupp, " that owing to the vexa- tions, diffuseness, and intricacy, and the scholastic tyranny which prevails in our schools, many a fine spirit is deterred from study. The ancient Latins named a school Lucius ; many schoolmasters have, however, made it a carnificina, or place of torture. If one should perchance pass by a place where such a scholastic tyrant rules, ubi plus nocet guajn docct, one may hear a pitiful howling and lamentation, as if Phalaris himself held his court there, and as if it were a den of the Furies rather than of the liberal arts. If I had a dog ^vh^ch I loved I would not hand him over to these beasts, much less a son." Passing from Ratich, who may be held to repre- sent in the field of education the new school of philosophy inaugurated by Bacon, we find the philo- sophy and method of education next taken up by his immediate successor Comenius. The tractate of John Milton, published soon after the appearance of the first works of Comenius, did not aim at THE TRAINING OF TIIK TEACHER. 7/ expounding a philosophy or method of education, but rather at laying down the subjects and order of instruction ; and notwithstanding many exquisite passages, it contributed, we should think, very little to the progress of thought on the subject. Amos Comenius, the pious bishop of the Moravians, in- herited the ideas of Ratich (although the precise extent of his indebtedness is uncertain), but being a man of more systematic mind he was not content with them as they stood. He had pre-eminently an organizing intellect, and the result of his labours w^as the production of a work which we believe to have been the first attempt to work out the whole method- ology of education on the basis of a definite scheme of philosophy. This philosophy was of an eclectic character, and while resting on Christian theology, borrowed not a little from Plato and Aristotle. The leading idea of his system, as indeed it must be the leading idea of all educational method, is that we ought to proceed according to nature. In his prin- cipal treatise, published in 1627, he begins dogmati- cally ab ovo by laying down certain propositions regarding man, from which he instantly proceeds to make deductions. His first proposition, for example, is that man is the last, most complete, and the most excellent of living creatures. His second proposition is that the final end of man lies beyond this life ; and here he points out that man's life is threefold — vege- table, animal, and intellectual or spiritual. The first nowhere manifests itself outside the body, the second 78 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. Stretches forth to objects through the operation of the senses, the third is able to exist separately as well as in the body. The third general proposition is that life is only a preparation for an eternal life; the visible world is a seed-plot, a boarding-house and a training- school for man. The fourth proposition is that there are three steps of preparation for eternity : to know one's self and all things, to have power over all things and one's self, and to refer all things to God, the source of all. These requirements are summed up in the words Eruditio, Virtus, Religio. The seeds of all these are in us by nature, and the object of education is to develop them. How is this to be done ? By recognizing a law and order in man's growth, as in the realm of nature. Let us, then, find the law and order of nature, and we shall find the law, order, and method of education. Proceeding on this track, Comenius lays down a large number of general principles of nature, which he at once transfers to the sphere of education, deducing from them rules of method. Moral and religious instruction, questions of school-management and of school-organization, arc all considered in detail from the same point of view. It is scarcely necessary to say that the attempt to carry out a parallelism of process in the operations of nature and in the educating of a mind fails in the hands of Comenius, and leads to a forcing of the argument, and to the propounding of analogies which are not true analogies. This straining of parallelism, while it vitiates the argument as a logical whole, is \ THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 79 yet fruitful of many suggestions. It does not always fail. The practical outcome of his philosophic treat- ment is indeed almost always good. There is scarcely a method in teaching or a device in class-manage- ment in the present day accepted as final which may not be found in Comenius. Like Ratich, Comenius warred against the mere word-teaching of his time. " Id agendum est," says Seneca, " ut non verbis serviamus sed sensibus." The scholastic maxim, " Nihil est in intellectu nisi quod prius in sensu," was accepted by him as absolute in the school. His great aim was to teach about things — all things in heaven and earth — through language, and language again by the presentation to the mind of all things. In moral instruction Comenius gives thirteen canons, and he has a most instructive chapter on the teaching of religion. In all these things he was far ahead not only of his own, but even of the present, time. His philosophical system yielded him thoughts on the organization of schools as well as of the in- struction to be given in them. He was the first to conceive the idea of the infant school under the name of the " mother-school ; " and his gradation of schools was so well devised, that, with very slight modifica- tions, it now constitutes the State system of Germany. The merits of Comenius are mainly due to the fruitfulncss of his philosophical ideas, inadequate as these were ; and if we are to mark his defects, it is to his philosophy also we must look as the source 8o THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. and explanation of these. Like many men of his time, he was under the commanding influence of the Baconian Induction, which had directed the attention of men away from grammatical niceties and scholastic subtleties, to the external realities of nature. He was consequently a Realist in education. When he came to deal with method he had not, however, the full advantage of the inductive method as applied to psychology. Inductive psychology, indeed, was in its infancy. He, like many others then and now, was driven by a strong feeling of reaction against word- teaching and logical subtleties, to a belief in the omnipotence of a knowledge of the realities of nature and man to reform [^the human race. Such expecta- tions could lead only to disappointment. Discipline of intelligence simply as discipline, and discipline of will in the moral sphere, were alike subordinated to mere information. Even in the moral sphere, to which Comenius gave more prominence than it has since received, mere instruction (spite of his motto, Agenda agendo) was to accomplish all or almost all. Notwith- standing these defects, we find in the writings of this remarkable man the germ of all succeeding educa- tional reform. We have dwelt thus long on Ratich and Comenius, that we may show the close connection that subsists between education and the philosophy of mind. The art of education rest on the methodology, and the methodology of education, again, rests on psychology, while psychology is only a part of our larger philo- THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 8 1 sophy of man. A system may be thus elaborated ; and it is from systematized and thoroughgoing elabo- rations that we learn most, even when we find it necessary to set aside the system itself as radically defective. The whole history of philosophy is an illustration of this. And it is not surprising that it should be so ; for the moment a man imposes on himself the work of systematizing his reasoned con- victions, he is driven of necessity to find for them some broad and solid foundation ; and, working in- ductively and deductively, to fit his thought into a connected and logical whole. This effort serves as a test of his doctrine applied by himself before it is exposed to the criticism of other minds. We have had many excellent essays on education since Comenius's time, of which the most important is that of John Locke ; many schemes of educational organization ; many social treatises on the philosophy of education, such as those of Rousseau and Pesta- lozzi ; many elaborate applications of the German philosophical systems of Kant, Herbart, Hegel, and Beneke, to the subject of education in general ; many treatises on methods, more especially those called into existence by the normal schools of America, Ger- many, France, and Great Britain ; but we have had only partial attempts to lay a psychological founda- tion for education, and to deduce from this, aided by the experiential inductions provided by the actual work of a school, a reasoned and coherent system of methodology and school practice. That we shall G 82 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. have such attempts in the future as our knowledge of mind, and of the physiology or material basis of mind, extends, we have no doubt. The conviction will gradually force itself on men's minds, that in the training of a great profession it is only by a well- conceived scientific preparation that we can give method and law to educational genius, while we supply the lack of genius in that large proportion of aspirants who seek to enter the profession, from honourable motives certainly, but without any strong educational impulse. Locke's tendencies are all realistic and utilitarian. And it is a remarkable fact that it is this realistic impulse, if we may so name it, which has given us our best and ablest works on education in England and France. Passing over numerous books of great practical value but of unambitious aim and touching only parts of the field, we do not reach an English writer on education of philosophical rank and aim till we come to Mr. Herbert Spencer — himself also a realist, who affects to deal with the whole range of the science. He puts before us in a rational form, frequently commanding our hearty assent, the position of the " modern " school who advocate instruction in realities as of supreme importance. Even the oppo- nent of Mr. Spencer must be thankful to him for it — not merely because of the lucid logic of his reasoning, but for a philosophic statement which, merely because it is philosophic, minimizes the distance between the utilitarian school and its opponents. This is a matter THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 83 of great importance, because if the education of a country is to be properly organized it is desirable that a mutual understanding should be arrived at by different schools of thought. If \vc wish to see how the philosophy of education may influence for better or worse the whole life of a nation, we have only to read Mr. Spencer's book. He tells us that the aim of all sound education is to train to " the right ruling of conduct in all directions and in all circumstances," and is an answer to the question, " How to live ? " He then proceeds to indicate a system of instruction which shall bring youth into an intelligent practical relation with the world in which they have to work. The error here is that which we have found in preceding realists, notably Comenius, viz., that it is by instruction or information that we educate. It is true that when Mr. Spencer comes to deal with method he insists on instruction being determined in its successive stages by the laws of the normal evolution of intelligence, if it is to be effectual for its end ; but still it is instruction and the order of instruction which is the governing idea of his philosophy of education. Not that the discipline of intellect is altogether ignored by him. On the contrary, his chapter on Intellectual Education is one of the most valuable in his book. But even here it is not discipline in the best accepta- tion of that w^ord, but the development of intelligence as based on a training of the senses and proceeding therefrom in orderly evolution, that he urges on his 84 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. reader. We believe that every thoughtful educa- tionalist will accept Mr. Spencer's reasonings so far as they go. Idealists and realists must meet here. The intelligence proceeds inductively in acquiring knowledge, and the teacher, if he be truly an educator, must initiate into all knowledge also inductively. The universal canons are : " From the Concrete to the Abstract," " From the Particular to the General." But this having been done, what then ? The intelligence, by moving in accordance with its laws, is certainly, we freely admit, trained ; but is it, in the true ac- ceptation of the term, disciplined? This throws us back on the further question, What do we mean by the discipline of intelligence ; and when we have dis- ciplined it what have we gained ? Is the game worth the candle ? Such questions belong to the philosophy of education, and they are not idle questions. On the answer depends the subjects taught in our schools, the aim of instruction, the organization of instruction, and the methods of instruction. The philosophy of Herbert Spencer, and we may add of all empirists such as Professor Bain, offers us no adequate solution of the question — is indeed, if consistent, incapable of doing so. In moral education, again, Mr. Spencer's chapter is full of wisdom, and suggests even more than it directly inculcates. His two leading principles — that the educator's object is to rear a self-governing human being and not a being to be governed by others, and that punishment should be the natural conse- quences of acts — are, so far as they go, sound. But as THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 85 constituting the whole moral aim of education, this, to our thinking, is very defective, while the penalty sug- gested is adequate to the guidance of boyhood and youth only within very narrow limits. As water cannot rise higher than the level of its source, so an educational theory cannot rise higher than the philosophy from which it emanates. If we hold that man is a being who seeks after ideals both in the intellectual and in the moral world, then, assuredly, the ideals of holiness, purity, integrity, courage, self- sacrifice, are to be set up before the boy and youth, and our teaching should be so directed as to promote the growth of those ideals. Wherein consists the inner penalty of a failure in purity or integrity if these virtues are to be degraded to the position of being the product of a mere correlation of the individual and his wants with external conditions — a correlation .so adjusted as to secure the most and the best? It is impossible, it seems to us, that an educational system that looks no higher than this of utilitarianism can furnish a motive to the teacher or elevate the human race, although it may suffice to hold society together. The boy, the youth, and the man must have a type of excellence after which they strive — ideas in which to live, and, above all, an ideal to contemplate higher than any that mere prudential morality can furnish. A perfect type of mere pru- dential morality would, in point of fact, be necessarily an insufferable prig and pedant. Our moral ideal must have in it the elements of infinitude that it mav 86 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. call forth an infinite striving, and the characteristics of the perfectly beautiful that it may draw us by the cords of love. We have said that the educational theory of Mr. Spencer (and we cite him as representative of an influential school) is inadequate in the aim it proposes to itself, both in the intellectual and the moral sphere, and consequently also in its methods. We say in- adequate, for, so far as they extend, the aims and method are, speaking generally, to be accepted. Edu- cation ceases to be a work of surpassing importance if its aim be not the highest possible for man ; and the educator who abnegates ideals and the spiritual life thereby places himself on a level lower than that on which we should wish to find him. The depression of his aim depresses likewise the methods to be pursued, and his whole function and position in the .social system. The animating forces of his own individual life must also be the aims of his profes- sional activity in the school. His ideal for others, he may rest assured, cannot rise above his ideal for himself If we do not accord to man something more than a power of reacting against external impressions and co-ordinating these by virtue of association, we miss the true meaning of his existence. The central force which we call Ego, and of which the essential and connate characteristic is Will, seeks to connect itself with limitless aims and eternal ideas. It will be satisfied with nothing less. Contemplating steadily THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 8/ man as distinctively and par eminence a living will among the forces of nature, self-conscious by virtue of that will, and striving instinctively to find God as the end as well as fountain of his being, we are at once supplied with a most fruitful principle. We are furnished with aims and methods of education which, while embracing the whole sphere of knowledge and mere prudential activity claimed by the propounders of a less adequate conception of man's life and destiny, stretch into regions which are of necessity, and by their own showing, an unknown and unknowable world to the sensationalist. Let us consider for a moment how the view of the philosophy of man that we have indicated affects the education we seek to give to the young, that we may exemplify still further the close connection that sub- sists between a nation's philosophy and its educational aims and methods. If man be pre-eminently a will ; if it be a capable and completely fashioned will that we as educators desire to help each of our pupils to realize for himself; if year by year our object is to aid this pure spiritual force to risk above the environ- ment of nature and be truly itself, our educational task is at once defined for us. Will, as spiritual force and supremacy over nature (which term of course includes the appetites and desires of our human nature), must in the sphere of intelligence be disci- plined with a view to its easy and ready application to objects of knowledge and to the affairs of life. Dis- crimination, discernment, sustained power of self-ap- 8S THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. plication — these are the qualities of intelligence which we must foster. From the purely practical point of view, is it not the fact that these are the characteristics by which one man excels another in the business of life ? Discipline then is, according to our conception of the philosophy of man, our chief intellectual end as educators. But this discipline of the will which, as the specific characteristic of man, is the basis of in- telligence, is not enough if we regard it merely as pure spiritual force ; it moves, in accordance with certain laws, to the acquisition of knowledge, and to the discrimination of the true and right among the complex materials of our daily life. These laws are sufficiently indicated in the ordinary psychological logic of induction and deduction. We must then in the subjects we teach, and, above all, in our method of teaching, work the intelligence in the line of these laws. This may be called training, as distinct from disciplining, though it is manifestly difficult to intro- duce a distinction here. Mere force will not carry mind to its aim ; it proceeds by a way, and that way is method. The material which we give for this will and method to work in, is a matter of great import- ance doubtless, but the consideration of this must always be governed by the higher object of all educa- tion, which is training and discipline. Starting from this point, we have to consider the material in which each and all of us have to work — the environment of our lives provided for us in the divine order, and to which we must loyally conform. It seems to us that THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 89 there ought to be little difficulty in determining the subjects of instruction and the order of instruction, if vvc allow the question of intellectual discipline and method to dominate the question of the materials of school-work. In the moral sphere, again, Will stands pre-eminent. It is this that we have to cultivate. In the religious sphere we have, following at once Aristotle and the Christian doctrine, to direct the will and to fix it in the contemplation of the divine. It can ultimately find satisfaction for its restless activity only in spiritual ideas and in God. Comparatively little value is to be attached by the educator to moral instruction, save in so far as it is directed and inspired by religion. It is this marriage of the moral and the spiritual that produces what may be denoted by one name — the ethical life. The discipline of the will in mere under- standing and knowing contributes also its share to true ethical discipline. The unity of educational result may be in truth summed up in the single word, ethical. Our aim in the school, therefore, is an ethical aim, and all we do is of true value only in so far as it con- tributes to this — the final cause of all our teaching. By keeping this purpose steadily in view, we alone truly educate a human being. Unity of purpose and method, both in the intellectual and moral sphere, is thereby secured. It is some such unity of purpose and method which the study of the philosophy of education must give if it is to supply the place of native inspiration to the teacher. 90 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. We are aware that the elements of mental science are already taught in some normal schools in England and America. We should desire to see this subject included in the curriculum of every normal school. But even then the philosophy of education in any adequate sense would not be taught. It is only by connecting this subject closely with the philosophical faculty in all our universities, where students are being carried through a higher course of instruction than is practicable at normal schools, that it can re- ceive thorough scientific and historical treatment. It is true that only a small proportion of the teachers of a country would even in that event come under the influence of philosophy ; for only a small pro- portion have the qualifications necessary for a uni- versity career and can find the necessary time to prosecute it. But it is with this subject as with all others. The fact that it was cultivated in the universi- ties would gain for it respect and attention outside the university walls. The few who, after a course in the philosophy of education, might go forth as educators would carry with them an influence that would extend to every corner of the profession. The entire body of teachers would begin to affiliate themselves in spirit to the universities, and seek guidance thence. United by the bond not merely of a common occupation but of a common professional standard of aim and work, the university and the humblest infant-school would join hands. The teaching body thus bound together would become a national institution, in the sense in THE TRAINING OP^ THE TEACHER. 9 1 which the church was, and in Great Britain still is, an institution ; an institution, moreover, of great power and importance, because broader in its conception and aims than the church, and commanding, in these days at least, more universal sympathy. The schoolmaster would then take rank with the professions, which at present he can scarcely be said to do, either in Eng- land or America. In this new republican hierarchy (if we may conjoin almost contradictory terms) the civil power would find its best friend and its surest guarantee of law, order, and stability. It is mainly, indeed, in the hope of aiding in the organization of a new institution which shall contribute to order and civilization in the midst of the disorganizing forces by which society is surrounded that we advocate a philo- sophical basis of training for the teacher. And as to the teacher himself ; he can hope to hold the social position which he desires, only when he is a recognized social influence and is a member of a compact organiza- tion which stands prominently before the public as an independent profession. It is in the philosophy and history of education alone that the members of the craft can find a common ground of genuine intellectual professional life, and a true and worthy union of in- terests and aims. INTRODUCTORY LECTURE DELIVERED IN THE UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH, IN THE CLASS OF THE " THEORY, HISTORY, AND ART OF EDUCATION." I PURPOSE, on this occasion, to confine myself to a few colloquial remarks suggested by the present relation of the Education Department to Scotland. It is impossible for us to have State control of our educational system which will be satisfactory to the country, until we have its centre of activity trans- ferred from London to Edinburgh ; but, meanwhile, we must make the best of our present circumstances, and we shall perhaps do so most effectually by being liberal of complaint and criticism. It is a strange, and to those who learn it for the first time, an incredible fact, that while the various Faculties of the Universities of Scotland confer pro- fessional degrees in Law, Medicine, Theology, Science (including even Sanitation), Engineering — all having a practical value in the business of life — the degree of the Faculty of Arts confers no professional privilege on THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 93 Teachers. Time was when the Arts Degree conferred a licentia docendi within the university itself ; now, it does not give the statutory right to hold a school even of the meanest kind. Nine months' instruction in a Training College secures a privilege which is denied to even the Honours' Graduates of the Scottish Universities ! All that the attainment of an Honours Degree can do for the bearer of it is to give him the privilege of going up to be examined along with the nine months' Training College students ! That the Government should demand of all the graduates who intend to be schoolmasters, however distinguished, a knowledge of the principles and art of Education is right and reasonable ; but surely this addition to the Arts' curriculum should be held to suffice.* It is not for the Universities I speak, but for the country ; and the country, I venture to say, demands that not merely the full Degree, but also a minor Diploma attainable after two years' study, and after one year in the case of those who pass the Three Years' Curriculum Examination, should be within reach of tho.se who propose to adopt the profession of public schoolmaster. How else is the standard of Scottish education in the public schools to be main- tained ? Codes will fail to do it ; you must have Mai, and it is the Universities alone which can produce the higher class of men. I do not mean again to argue * The necessary reform has since been made by the Education Department ; but I let my remarks stand, in the hope that the Depart- ment may become aUve to the fact tliat it is possible tliat it may be wrong on points not yet conceded. 94 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. the general question here, or to complain of the Government monopoly conferred upon the Training Colleges to the great detriment of education in Scot- land ; but, rather to content myself with adverting to certain aspects of University training which concern teachers as a body, and the country through them. I shall then speak of the present condition and prospects of our public elementary schools. On the former subject I would remark — First, that the University training of a certain proportion of the teachers of the country, who by their influence would sustain the level of all the others, is not only of the greatest importance to schools, but is of vital moment to the intellectual character, moral weight, and social standing of the teaching profession as a whole. Secondly, I shall endeavour briefly to show that the Universities provide the only means of affording to the teaching profession a " career : " and a " career " is essential to the life and vigour of every profession. As to the first point, it is well known that the Government requirements of Training Colleges are such as tend to restrict rather than to promote mental activity. Although the Education Department has a fair defence to make, yet there can be no doubt that, in Scotland at least, Training College studies might with great advantage be considerably liberalized. The knowledge which the pupil-teachers bring with them from the country schools might easily be in- creased, and the Department would then be justified in relieving the Training College curriculum of the THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 95 pressure of those studies, which burden the memory at the expense of the reasoning powers, and which, though they certainly do give a considerable amount of discipline, yet restrict the independent thought, the spiritual activity, the fervour, and imagination of youth. Such studies (to use the words of Quintilian), "detinent atque obruunt ingenia." Brain exercise, to be truly disciplinal, must have some outlook beyond the lesson of the hour, and far beyond the next examination day. Love of a subject for itself has at present no time to grow under the pressure of the multifarious demands made on the time of the student. Intellectual aspira- tion is curbed ; and it is only in the minority that it ultimately survives. And I am satisfied that it sur- vives even in the few, only because they see, looming above and beyond their present work, the more liberal studies of the Universities, holding up a more elevated standard and inviting them to a higher and more congenial exercise of their powers. Were the prospect of enrolling themselves on some future day among the cives of a University, as many of them happily do, for ever impossible to them (as is the case with their brethren south of the Tweed), the fire of intellectual ambition, already burning low enough, would, I fear, quite go out. It is the culture of a class which ultimately deter- mines the social estimation in which it is held more than any other one fact. For this culture the teachers of Scotland must look to the Universities. Referring to some who desired a reduction of the standard of 96 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. attainment in Training Colleges, the Bishop of Exeter says, in his evidence before the Commission on Popular Education in England in 1861, "I think that it would be far better if you could get schoolmasters with less knowledge and more education, which is commonly what is meant by people who ask for what they call a lower standard" {p. 132). The Royal Commissioners for Scotland, appointed in 1865, and among whom were the Duke of Argyll and Lord Moncreifif, say, " If University apart from Normal School training for Masters is imperfect " [imperfect, that is to say, only in so far as it does not provide for the practical. W^^n- ing of the future teacher], " Normal School training apart from the University seems to be imperfect also. The evidence which we have collected on this point, establishes the conclusion that the most efficient teacher is he who combines both." I lay nothing to the charge of the Education Department : the preparation with which the young students come to the Training Colleges and the specific object for which they receive free education and scholarships, make it necessary to retain much of the present narrow curriculum. There are many respects, however, in which the system of instruction might be improved ; and were the studies more liber- alized these seminaries would do better the special work they aim at doing, and which, I willingly con- cede, they alone are fitted to do effectually, and which they must continue permanently to do. I say per- manently, for there can be no doubt that Normal THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 97 Schools are now permanent national institutions. All I desire is that the minority whose previous education — obtained it matters not where — fits them for the higher and better training of the University, should not only be permitted to take what the University offers, but encouraged to do so in the interests of the education of Scotland. It will be universally admitted that the Training Colleges can never of themselves supply the country with teachers who will take the social position of University men, and so sustain a high, moral, and intellectual level for the profession as a whole. A considerable proportion of men trained at the Universities would give tone to the general body. The whole corporation of teachers is interested in this question. All other professions occupy themselves with the qualifications of their members. The other day even the English solicitors were talking of an University qualification for their profession ; we know that both here and in England the qualification for entrance to Church and Bar is a constant subject of corporate interest. Why, then, do we hear so little of this subject from the Chartered Institute ? This one aspect of a profession, the con- ditions for entering it, is itself sufficient ground, were there no other, for the members who constitute that profession associating themselves. Nay, it would not be difficult to show that it is the chief ground for asso- ciation in the case of those professions to which the State has not given powers of internal discipline. There are some who would extend the abolition H 98 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. of professional qualifications and privileges to every department of the civil organization, and would leave everything to settle itself after a general scramble, the many-headed public being judge. This extreme opinion, held, however, even by few among the most radical, has no life in it ; it is a mere passing whim occurring to the mind, even of the leveller, only in its most perverse moods. The more widespread and real political equality becomes, all the more does society need the protection and support of organized institutions possessing a certain vitality and standard of their own ; and such an institution is the Scholastic Profession. The second aspect of this question to be brought into view is this, that the connection of the Univer- sities with the training of public schoolmasters, con- stitutes the teaching profession a career, and is the only way of constituting it a career. If the State had ^50,000 a year to spend on any profession in the shape of salaries to one thousand men, it would secure a far higher class of public ser- vants, both in respect of special training and intellectual capacity, by having twenty places with incomes varying from ^500 to ;^I500 a year, and distributing the remaining ^30,000 unequally, than by giving every man ;!^50 a year from the beginning to the end of his service. This is of the nature of a truism. And yet, somehow, the profession of Teacher is considered to lie outside the motives which are appealed to in every other occupation — even the most sacred. In the THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 99 earlier days of the Privy Council system, Sir J. P. Kay Shuttleworth was sanguine enough to hope, nay to expect, that men would be found to enter the profession of elementary teacher from missionary motives. Such an expectation was based on a very imperfect appreciation of facts. I should like to know how many men enter the Church desirous to labour in humble spheres, unknown to fame and heedless of reward. There have always been a few ; but even these, while they give to the Church which they serve the reputation of self-denying zeal, receive back, from the first day of their consecration, the social consideration which that Church has made good for itself in the estimation of the whole world, and are, as it were, invested with all its power and dignity. That there may have been one here and there from whose mind even this feeling was wholly absent I am willing to believe ; but that a man should, with similar self-denial, give himself to the mission of teaching would be the greatest of all self- abnegations, because, as yet, that occupation is only very partially supported by social opinion, and is unrecognized and undignified by Church and State. To sacrifice oneself on these terms would be to be a missionary indeed ! A rare man may be found who is capable of it, and who would be content to labour on, poor and unknown, and to die without even an obituary intimation that he had passed away. But we cannot look to such exceptional motives and excep- tional men to do the work of a profession. And it is lOO THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. absurd to suppose that because men look to the attainment of a modest but adequate reward in repu- tation and emolument, that, therefore, they do not bring to their profession a pure love of their work and an earnest desire to promote the Kingdom of Christ in Church or School. There are many degrees of the missionary spirit, and whether a man has it in absolute purity or not is known, I suspect, not even to himself Let us, then, take it for granted that the immense majority — ninety-five per cent, shall we say? — even of those professions which, like that of the Educator, have to do with the intellectual improvement and moral elevation of man will be attracted to their work by mixed motives — a natural disposition for the special kind of work which they select, a pure desire to do that work efficiently through mere love of efficiency, and a desire for personal reputation, social esteem, and substantial reward. South of the Tweed the complaint has been general, that at twenty-two a Teacher has as much of the last three as he has at sixty-two ; that he attains early — earlier than men in any other profession what- soever — a very fair income, and there remains station- ary. Doubtless there are various kinds of elementary schools, and the young teacher may move from an inferior position to one somewhat better ; but they are all on the same social level. In this respect the Teacher is not a professional man, but rather like an artisan who earns at twenty-two the wages of fifty- two. This is a very undesirable state of things ; not THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. lOI for the teacher alone, but, through him, for the nation. Very competent and well-instructed men now enter the profession ; but were there more prospect of pro- motion the quality of aspirants would unquestionably improve, to the great benefit of society : it matters not how humble the beginning is, if the end be an object of ambition. Now, it may not at first appear how the privilege of sending out a certain proportion of public school- masters by the Universities would contribute to the constituting of the desired "career." But a little con- sideration will show how it would work in an educa- tional system like that of Scotland. The University training would connect together the different parts of the system. Men going out with a University diploma would naturally look for appointments in those public schools only in which the Boards desired to have a man fit to prepare boys for the Universities ; the best of the graduates, again, going at once into High Schools of the first or second rank. A man who with a University diploma accepted a town or country public school of the kind I refer to, would look for- ward to the best schools of this class as the first object of his ambition, and teach under the spur of this hope. His next object of ambition would be to obtain a place in a High School of the second rank, and finally of the first. If he found that the fact of his holding only the minor University diploma was against him — notwithstanding admitted eminence as a teacher — he would, after he had saved a little money, return to the I02 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. University for a full degree in Arts or Science. In this way the ordinary public elementary schools of the better class would be connected with the highest positions in the profession, and all ranks be bound together by a common interest. But it may be said that the gradation of teaching- rank, of which I have been speaking, does not go down below University men, and that there is a career consequently only for these. But it is not so. Normal School men who go straight from the Training Colleges to serve in public schools are not left out in the cold ; they have excellent opportunities of raising themselves. A few of the more able and vigorous among these generally come to the University after they have served a few years in the country ; and more would come if the University Arts' teaching had any statutory value for them. I think I have now shown you that it is through the Universities that the social standing of the teaching profession can alone be sustained ; and also that it is through the same Universities that the profession can alone become a career. No profession, no skilled occupation even, is on a healthy basis unless it afford a career. Having spoken thus far of the teaching profession,. I would now say a few words on the present state and prospects of public school education in Scotland. In doing .so I deal with that aspect of the question which touches the " business and bosom " of every resident in THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 103 the country parishes who have sons and daughters to educate. I deal, too, with an important commercial question, because one of the commodities which this country has been in the habit of taking into the market of the British empire has been " intellect." In this department of "intellect" Scotland, as Mr. Gladstone once remarked, has been an exporter. It would not be fair to attack the Act of 1872. The Act is not responsible for the admitted depres- sion of higher instruction in the country schools. In the 67th clause of the Act the minutes regulating the administration of Parliamentary grants are ordered to be constructed, subject to the provision " that due care shall be taken by the Scotch Education Depart- ment that the standard of education which now exists in the public schools shall not be lowered, and that as far as possible as high a standard shall be maintained in all schools." We all know what these words pointed to. They had reference solely to that kind of instruction which prepared country lads for the Universities, — instruction in Latin, mathematics, and the elements of Greek. And my conviction is that, had that clause not been inserted, the Act would never have passed. Faith has not been kept with us. For how has the provision been given effect to ? By informing teachers that after giving an hour's steady daily work where there is one class (and about two hours' where there are two or more classes) to the instruction of a few promising boys and girls who take Latin and mathematics, they I04 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. will be rewarded at the end of the year with 4^-. per subject for each boy ! We must put the saddle on the right horse, then, and that horse is not the Act, but the Scotch Education Department. The tempo- rary Board appointed to conserve Scottish interests found that its powers of Code-drafting ceased with its first efforts in that direction. While, however, we must admit that the Code in its influence on that kind of instruction which prepares boys for the Universities is wholly bad, we are far from wishing to attack the Code indiscriminately. It is our duty, on the contrary, to acknowledge that the Code has great merits, and that in many respects it has been of signal benefit to education in Scotland. We must bear in mind that a Code for public elementary schools must be constructed primarily for the benefit of the many, not of the few. If this be so, we take up an indefensible position if we oppose the Code as a whole. Just let us go back fifteen years, and look into the state of elementary education before the introduction of a Code designed to direct the energies of teachers. The Duke of Newcastle's Commission reported in 1 861 that the trained teachers throughout the country were good in every respect but one. That exception, however (they go on to say), is a most " important one. It is that tiic junior classes in the schools, com- prehending the great majority of the children, do not learn, or learn imperfectly, the most necessary part of what they come to learn — reading, writing, and arith- metic." There cannot be the slightest doubt as to THE TRAINING OP^ THE TEACHER. I05 the widespread disregard of the simple elements of reading, writing, and arithmetic up to 1861. Even a " good " school meant only a good " highest " class, and as the majority of the children left for work before the age of eleven, the objects of the Parliamentary Grant were clearly not attained. The case was not quite so bad in Scotland, but still it was bad enough. The cause of the evil was not in the indifference of the schoolmasters so much as in the want of skill in classification and organ- ization and in the defective teaching staff. Com- paratively few outside the Normal School men could construct a time-table even in the rudest and crudest way ; and nothing more than this one fact is needed to show that they knew little of school organization, and especially of that part of it which is indispensable to the full effect of a teacher's labours — classification. The powers even of a zealous man were wasted through want of skill. With great expenditure of energy, he was merely beating the air. Of course there were many exceptions ; but, speaking generally, I describe the actual state of the case. A remedy was needed, and that a drastic one. A regulator of the great teaching engine had to be introduced. The Code then, in so far as it required the teachers to classify with accuracy and to fix a standard of attainment for each successive class — I say reqtih'ed advisedly — was a great boon to the education of the country, and corrected an evil which was simply in- tolerable. Nay rnore, the Code was a boon in so far I06 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. as it required {^r\6. here again I use the word advisedly) teachers to begin to teach writing and arithmetic on the same day on which they began to teach reading, and also to pay more attention to mere mechanical facility in the use of the mere instruments of education. These were the primary objects of the Revised Code ; so far, it was educationally sound, and so far it will be, I trust, a permanent institution. The Privy Council took aim at certain evils, and they hit their mark. But, unfortunately, while curing a particular disease, they set up an unhealthy action in the body scholastic as a whole. The country was resolved to get a substantial commodity in return for its outlay. With this view it concentrated its attention on things which had an admitted value and the aspect of substantiality, and ignored all others. For how could a Code weigh or measure intellectual, moral, or aesthetic results ! Here was a difficulty at the threshold. These evidently were regarded as visionary things. If entertained at all, they were entertained with that supercilious contempt of true education, characteristic of minds which find in Mara- thon and Thermopylae the insignificant records of mere tribal contests.* The " Department " accord- ingly made "grants in aid" turn on attendance at school and on individual passes in reading, writing, and ciphering — all nicasiirablc quantities. Given an arithmetical unit of measure for school work and assign to it the value of a coin of the realm, and you * Lord Shcrbrooke's address to tlie Institute of Engineers. THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 10/ could express the working result of each school by so many figures. The annual Report of the Department might have consisted of a big iminbcr, and nothing more. Any gentleman could have carried it home from the " House " on his thumb-nails — expenditure on one thumb-nail, "results" on the other. What a triumph of administration was this! The "nation of shopkeepers " had got its quid pro quo. Trace the changes made in the Code since 1861, and you will see that they were for the most part of the nature of relaxations of rules, or of concessions to demands for the introduction of this, that, or the other subject into the school with a payment attached to each. Almost all these changes have been improve- ments, and the education of the country unquestion- ably owes much to them. Take for example the introduction of domestic economy for girls, of singing for all, and of composition for the highest class. And yet, notwithstanding all this, the Code was merely patchwork at best, as appeared when England had to be dealt with afresh in 1871, and Scotland in 1873. The Department seemed suddenly to have resolved to satisfy clamorous crotchet-mongers all round by recognizing with one bold stroke everything teach- able, under the designation of "specific subjects," or, as teachers now call them, " specifics." It gathered under its gracious patronage all the arts and all the sciences, and — not it may be without a touch of grim humour — it challenged the whole army of school- masters to teach these, if they could, at 4^. per head Io8 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. per annum ! And now I may presume that the Inspectors travel with a copy of " Chambers' Encyclo- paedia " in their dog-carts, half a dozen grammars, and a tuning-fork. For they are not only exposed to be called on to examine in the ordinary subjects of school instruction, including Music and Drawing, and Sewing and Cutting-out, but they must be ready to test the little boys and girls in Geometry, Algebra, English Literature, Latin, Greek, French, German, Mechanics, Chemistry, Animal Physiology, Light and Heat, Magnetism and Electricity, Physical Geography, Botany, and Domestic Economy ! But this was not all, for Scotland gloried in being an intellectual . country, and was the State-pocket to be buttoned up, when Intellect cried aloud for what is called " pecuniary encouragement ? " Not so : the Depart- ment was equal to the occasion, and gracefully yielded to Scotland Art. 19, c. i, whereby "Intelligence" is rewarded at the rate of 2s. per head : The sum is small perhaps, but it is probable that the authorities were of opinion that Scottish intelligence did not, after all, need much stimulus, and that it could take care of itself pretty well. Wc must then regard the small- ness of the reward as a compliment to our mental superiority. I sometimes wonder if there is, or ever has been, any people on the face of the earth, except the British, who would gauge their educaticjnal work after this patchwork fashion ; and whether, if they did so, they would stop where the Code stops. If in- telligence is worth 2s. a head, what price are we to THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. lOQ pay for morality? A morality-schedule, filled up after due inquiry and attestation, is not an adminis- trative impossibility. With columns of the virtues opposite the name of each boy and girl, we might have in such a schedule a great engine for estimating the moral condition of the country. What a valuable record for the future historian, throwing all Memoires pour servir into the shade ! Animal physiology at 4^-. per head, intelligence at 2s., integrity at 2s. 6d., truth-speaking at t,s., and a sensitive conscience generally at 4^"., would go quite well into a statistical table, and admit of summation, and of a numerical statement, including even decimals ! But to return to the more serious consideration of the Code, I repeat that it has done much for Scottish education : it was needed. But, having once settled the standards and the school classification, and com- pelled attention to the mechanical arts of reading, writing, and arithmetic, it should then, I hold, try, through its of^cials, to go right to the mind and heart of a school. It can do this only by taking a class, not an individual, as the school unit ; and if the mind of that class satisfies the Inspector it should be passed as a whole.* In this way the school organization would become more ela.stic all through, and boys would not be forcibly kept in the same standard in arithmetic as in reading. Let us not forget to congratulate the country on the fact that the Code is now moving in * This does not, of course, mean that every boy is not to be ex- amined. no THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. this direction. It is every year getting rid of some of its youthful crudeness. It is ripening and mellowing with time. A most significant step forward, for ex- ample, was taken in that very recognition of " intelli- gence " to which we have above referred ; and a still more significant one by the insertion of those little words in Art. 19, c. i, — the words "in the classes," — which words require the Inspectors to test " intelli- gence " in the classes as wholes. But, unfortunately, no article has yet attacked the root of the evil ; and the consequence is that the teacher has no time nor heart for the development of the intellectual and moral character of his school. He is repressed on every side by the laggards, and the school is repressed with him. The dullest pupils have to be brought up to a minimum standard, and energies have to be wasted on them which would be much more profitably employed in the quiet but steady cultivation of the mind of the school. Time thus profitably employed would have an effect which, by the nature of things, would be permanent. Labour so directed would give an impulse to the intel- lectual powers, and a training in moral perceptions and moral habits, which the children would never lose. The mental activity thereby engendered would not cease with the school, but be a self-producing energy of a kind that does not expend itself in one cfibrt, but gains fresh force by making effort. It is only, in point of fact, the skeleton of a school that is at present estimated : to use biological language, the morphology is reported on, the physiology is left out of sight — not THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. Ill in name, but in truth. One is reminded of the words of Quintihan (substituting the word ediicatiojie for oratione), Prooem. 24 : " Plerumque nudae illae artes frangunt atque concidunt quidquid est in educatione gcnerosius, et omnem sucum ingenii bibunt et ossa detegunt, qua^ ut esse et astringi nervis suis debent sic corpore operienda sunt." The Duke of Newcastle's Commission, which led to the Revised Code, ascer- tained that children did not read after they left school because they couldn't do it — a sufficient reason, certainly ; but another commission will find out, some day, that children can read, but dojit do it, simply because they have not the desire to do it. Their intellectual interests are nothing, and their intelligence is a machine which has never really worked and has con- sequently become rusted and clogged. If called upon to work it will not move at all, or move with such pain and discordant creaking that the process is not likely to be repeated. Some people would seem to think that the intelligence and morality of a people depend on their being able to read with a certain fluency ; but this is a mistake. It depends much more on their right interpretation of daily experience — it depends on their power of observation and of thinking. The Govern- ment should aim, in so far as its influence extends, at producing an observing, thinking, and moral popula- tion, and the reading will take care of itself as one of the instruments whereby the intelligence seeks to extend its knowledge and practise its powers. But how is the Government to measure the moral 112 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. and aesthetic elements in the school ? These things, as they are above price, so are they above measurement by means of any article in a Code. I think we must simply trust the Inspectors. Let them be empowered to examine a class mainly with a view to its intelligent mastery of the work of its standard and pass it as a whole for grants, if it as a whole satisfies them ; pro- vided always that, in the mere mechanical power of reading, 85 per cent, of the class can pass. This is the only cure for the evil. What, it will be said, is to be done with the remaining 1 5 per cent. ? The answer is easy. To use the words of Professor Black, of Aberdeen, in an excellent address published by him last April, the dunces are to be driven as far as they '' can go ivithoiit hindering- their ncigJibonrs!' If they cannot go on with their fellows, they must be left be- hind to repeat their work. Even if at the end of their school-life they cannot do mechanical reading and writing so well as they might have done under the present system (which, however, I do not believe), they will have received a far more valuable possession — the habit of exercising, or trying to exercise, such intel- ligence as they possess. Meanwhile, the boys of promise will not be unjustly retarded. I say unjustly, for it is simply not fair that promising boys should have their progress checked and their mental activity restricted in order that the dunces may be taught to spell. This is the worst kind of communistic social- ism, for it is the communistic socialism of the soul. Any incidental evils arising from placing implicit trust THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. 113 in the Inspectors might be checked by organizing the Inspectorate and giving a certain supervision and con- trol to Chief or Diocesan Inspectors, whose duty it would be to harmonize the inspection of large districts of country. The Inspectors would report to their im- mediate chiefs, and these again to the Department. And, I may remark, in passing, that annual reports on large sections of country in which the Inspectors-in- chief made use of the materials furnished to them by the sub-inspectors of their dioceses would be of great public interest and value. While speaking of the vexed question of the Code, I wish to separate two of the objections taken to it, which are commonly mixed together in the minds of hostile critics. The one is its discouragement of the higher subjects, in respect of which I hold that the Department has simply not carried out the law, and the character of the Code itself as it touches the whole school and affects the masses of the people. I have no sympathy with those who would sacrifice the mass of a school to the few boys who desire preparation for the professions ; and I agree with a schoolmaster who wrote a few months ago in the Scotsman, in a very healthy, manly way on this subject. There is time for the Code within the five hours of religious and secular instruction, and time before and after these hours for the teaching of the higher subjects, while the pupil teachers are being instructed. If more time is wanted, and that during the ordinary school hours, the School Boards must set free the master for this by the simple I 114 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. and cheap expedient of giving him an additional pupil teacher. In many cases, indeed, the master could get the additional monitorial assistance he needs in return for the higher instruction. This question of the higher subjects in schools is a totally distinct question from the educational character of the Code in its main features and primary objects. It is vain for school- masters to ask to be relieved of English, geography, arithmetic, dictation, etc., in order that they may teach Latin and mathematics, and Greek, to five or six boys and girls : nor do the best of them desire this. The practical exclusion of all but the merest elements of these last-named subjects from the ordinary work of the school-day, if the length of that day does not ex- ceed five hours, cannot be reasonably objected to. The true objection to the Code is that its money pay- ments are so awarded as to demand that the teacher — if he would please his Board and maintain his reputation in the eyes of the undiscerning multitude — shall spend his energies on the dunces and laggards of the school in the teeth of Nature and Providence. In consequence of this, the masses are not attended to. The teacher cannot devote himself sufficiently to the slow and careful development of the intellectual and moral power of his pupils — a matter, surely, of pro- found importance to the country. I venture to say, that any teacher who spends ten minutes in an intel- lectual conversation with a class {after the Socratic fashion) on the subject of the day's lesson, is con- tinually haunted b\- the fear that he is losing three THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. II5 per cent, on account of some dull boy. Not that the three per cent, matters ; but this dull boy, if not attended to, lowers the per centage of Government " passes " and affects the reputation of the teacher with the people and with his Board. Is the attainment of such a result as this promoting the education of the mass of the people ? Is the country so profoundly concerned about its dunces ? Is the bargain, which the State effects in such a case with the schoolmaster, a good bargain .? I think it is not. I think the State is, in this case, after all, a very dull and incompetent trader. As regards, now, the " higher " subjects — that is to say, those subjects which prepare boys for the Univer- sities and girls for Training Colleges — this, I would reiterate, is a totally distinct question, and lies outside the main body of the Code. The master has no time, with an ordinary staff, to teach more than the elements of these during the five hours of religious and secular instruction, if he is to do the work which we expect the Public School to do for the public. But by teach- ing the higher subjects above the elements, in the pupil teachers' classes, before and after the ordinary day's work, he can do much without over-straining his powers. If, however, the local Board will allow him a little additional assistance, and if Government will consent to measure his day's work by an intellectual and moral standard, he will have time within the ordinary school-hours to make some substantial pro- gress with advanced English, advanced arithmetic. Il6 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. and the elements of geometry and Latin ; and this not by giving the classes, as a whole, less of his attention, but by giving them his very best. The pupils will thus be prepared, intellectually, for the higher work, and pre-disposcd to seek it ; while the master's spirit will respond more readily to the demands made on him for advanced instruction, when he is treated by the State no longer as a mere machine, but as an in- tellectual and moral force. All instruction in the higher subjects, beyond the first year of such instriiction, would have generally to be given before or after the ordinary school-day. For all such instruction it is essential that the master be paid x\o\.pcr capita, but simply for success as a teacher. It is a more exhausting process to teach two boys Latin than to teach ten, and if a master has, owing to local circumstances, only two pupils, it is not un- reasonable to ask that he should be rewarded just as if he had ten, by a fixed Parliamentary Grant. This might be paid on condition that the local Board con- tribute an equal sum, either in the form of additional school assistance or of a direct increase of salary. Already, in the School Board of Canonbic, we have an instance of a Board which, seeing the rapid declension of the higher subjects in a school formerly distin- guished for the good teaching of them, offers a grant from the rates i)i addition to the Government Grant. And, let it be observed, that Boards in acting thus do not pay for the instruction of a few boys and girls only, but for the maintenance of a high standard in J THE TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. II7 the school, which tells powerfully on every child in it. The mental and moral stature of each individual pupil grows with the mental and moral stature of the school. I had hoped to be able to touch on some other points, but time fails me. I should have liked to speak of the desirableness of giving higher grants on account of the fifth and sixth standards than for the third and fourth ; but especially I should have desired to speak of the rural-parish endowments of Scotland, amounting to about ;^24,ooo a-year, as a fund by means of which the higher instruction might be encouraged in the country districts, in conformity with the 46th section of the Scottish Education Act. This would not be a diversion of the money, but a strictly equitable application of it in our altered circumstances ; and I have yet to learn that it would be illegal. I omit these things for the present, and some others ; but I would, with a persistency which I trust you will pardon, revert for a single moment to the subject with which I began, and which beyond all doubt is the educational question of the day in Scot- land, viz. the training of teachers. Offer grants even of i^io for every pupil who is being instructed in the higher branches, and you will utterly fail to get what you want unless the teachers have the ability to give it. Let us have the right men ; provide a little additional assistance in the school, and you will get all you want easily. We have the needed money in the counties aided by the Dick Bequest ; but the Bequest Il8 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. would be powerless were it not for the co-operation of the University of Aberdeen, which provides the right men — men of good University attainments, and possessed consequently of the highest scholastic am- bition. How shall we continue to secure such public servants if University diplomas are not recognized by the State just as medical and other diplomas are recognized ? To conclude : there is every reason to be hopeful of the future of Scottish education, and of the restora- tion of the higher instruction to our public or parochial schools. The Code, taken as a whole, has laid a good foundation, and on this we can build. We do not ask much from the Government, and we expect much from the country itself It is true that the changes we desire are of a vital character ; but they are easil}- made, and — an important matter — they are in the direction in which the Department has already begun to move. A few minor defects would still remain : I refer especially to the treating geography and history as special subjects, and to the omission to allow a double grant for boys who pass two standards in one year. These subordinate defects time would clear away. A few strokes of the Lord President's pen will do all we who live north of the Tweed can reasonably desire, and do it, I am certain, with the unanimous concur- rence, nay, the applause, of all who arc interested in the education of Scotland, and arc capable of patriotic sentiment. PRIMARY INSTRUCTION. THE HOUSE OF LORDS AND POPULAR EDUCATION.* The Function of the Primary School. The debate in the House of Lords f on the Educa- tion Code which ended in a majority of forty-eight, virtually condemning the action of the Education Department since 1870 in so far as it had encouraged anything beyond the most elementary instruction, was an event interesting in itself, and significant in the history of education in England. Had the promoters of what was virtually a vote of censure belonged to the Tory party only, the result might have been accepted as little more than a survival of a spirit sup- posed to have been extinct. It was not so, however. The Bishop of Exeter and Lord Sherbrooke ably represented the other side, and were in themselves * Fraser's Magazine. f Debate of the i8th of June in which llie following motion by Lord Norton was carried : " That a humble address be presented to Her Majesty, praying that Her Majesty would be graciously pleased to direct that the Fourth Schedule be omitted from the New Code of Regulations issued by the Conmiittee of Privy Council on Education." 122 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. evidence that there is a considerable feehng of dis- content with the action of the Department, and a still wider suspicion of its tendencies, if not of its aims. It is worth while to inquire whether there are any grounds for this dissatisfaction. It would be (absurd unhappily) in our country to suppose that any abstract educational theories have had anything to do, in the first instance at least, with the wide-spread doubts and dissatisfaction that ulti- mately found confused expression in the House of Lords. The money question is the real starting point of the malcontents. It is the large vote that stirs into activity the educational intelligence of the English people, and leads them to ask the question. What are we paying for, and whither are we tending ? Three millions per annum is a large sum, and might build more than one ironclad. The uneasiness with which many see this expenditure, which, after all, is only a portion of the total which the country pays for edu- cating its poorer citizens, leads them to fasten blindly on a certain class of payments that seem to be super- fluous. In addition to money grants calculated on the average attendance at a school, and the grants for passes in the " three R's," the Department pays for a class of subjects denominated " specific," which in the opinion of the House of Lords are not necessary to the child of the working man — nay, more, in their general effect and social tendency, are positively hurt- ful. These subjects certainly strike one, at the first blush, as out of place in a primary school : they are PRIMARY INSTRUCTION. 1 23 to be found in the Fourth Schedule attached to the main body of the Code, and include mathematics, English literature, Latin (in Scotland, Greek and Physics), French, German, mechanics, physiology, physical geography, botany, and domestic economy. It may be possible to urge a good educational argu- ment against giving instruction in such subjects in a primary school, but it must be conceded that the purely financial objection breaks down ; for the total sum spent on such subjects (excluding domestic economy for girls, to which we presume no objection will be taken), is comparatively a mere trifle. As part of an argument, however, against the alleged tendencies of the Department gradually and insensibly to draw into itself the whole work of secondary education, the financial objection may have weight. Is there any such tendency ? Is it credible that in men depressed by routine the love of power should still survive ? Is it conceivable that fervour in a "cause" should stir the official mind? It is only on the assumption that such things are possible that we can imagine any ground for imputing to the Department a disposition to transgress its limits ; for whatever may be said of other departments of the State, it is in the minds of the permanent officials that we must seek for the motives and aims that determine successive Education Codes, and this, because the subject is one of such infinite detail that the master of the details must, as pilot, control the vessel, whoever may be nominally its captain. For our own part, we 124 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. do not for a moment think the Department open to any such imputation. That the love of power can exist in the official mind, and in certain cases can even flourish under folds of red tape, we might be in- duced to believe ; but we do not think that any case has been made out of a deliberate disposition on the part of the Education Office to exceed its powers. And, indeed, why should they ? They have enough to do. A large and intricate machine is worked with surprising efficiency, and we are satisfied that to work it demands all the energy and ability in the service of the Minister of Education. Since the days of Sir J. P. Kay-Shuttleworth the Department has been gradu- ally absorbing the whole primary education of the country, and it is scarcely any exaggeration to say that it is now (alas !) cognizant of what is going on in every primary school in the country at every suc- cessive minute of the school day. By some this may be regarded as a proud position. To have conquered so great an intellectual empire by means of money, aided by the jealousies and mutual distrusts of churches, is no small triumph. But it is only in a limited and conventional sense, a success ; for, with the advantages, come all the evils of over-centraliza- tion, and these are more to be deprecated in the educational than in other spheres of State administra- tion. The life (jf education is the freedom of the teacher and the school, within certain general restric- tions ; and where this docs not exist, the intellectual and moral evils of centralization far more than PRIMARY INSTRUCTION. 12$ counterbalance the gain. Every teacher in the country- takes his orders from the Code, studies the Code, and devotes his energies to satisfy or to circumvent it. The power that resides in the Permanent Secretary's pen is probably greater than that wielded by any other official in the empire. Still this centralization has been an unpurposed, though an inevitable, growth ; and there seems no way out of it except by delegating some of the powers to the county governing bodies which we are now promised. County autonomy, con- trolled by a central official Council consisting partly of experts, is not inconsistent with the State's obtain- ing all the best ends of a national system — nay, it is probably the only way of best attaining those ends. We say that the power already exercised by the Department, and the many burdens that it has even now to bear, must subject it to a great strain ; and this, among other things, forbids our suspecting it of designs on the secondary education of the country. Were there any indications of such a design, the pro- posed inroad into this new domain would certainly have to be resisted. For, while admitting that secondary instruction is a subject clamantly calling for State organization, the work would have to be set about under very different auspices from that of the present Department, and would have to be controlled by a larger and more liberal spirit. We believe the fact simply to be, that impatient professors of all the " ologies " have been struck with admiration of the mighty instrument which the Queen in Council 126 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. had put into their hands, and have pressed their various pet educational crotchets on the patient and perplexed permanent secretary. The result has been, that round the dry and meagre Code introduced by Mr. Lowe in 1861, there has grown, by inevitable accretion, the list of " specific subjects " which now call forth so much adverse comment. We cannot believe the Department to be insensible to the humour of the situation, and we half suspect that they have with a certain wilful glee given the " modern spirit " full rein just to see what the issue would be. We not only acquit the Department of any such ambition as that attributed to them, but we believe that they are only acting on the line of the true Liberal tradition in education, viz. that it is the duty of the State in its own interest to see that all its citizens have at least an opportunity afforded them of being educated, not only up to the level of their existing position in the social scale, but up to the level of their possible position. Nor are we incon- sistent in supporting, at the same time, both the House of Lords and "the Department": the apparent inconsistency is reconciled by a proper understanding of the aims and the social restrictions of popular education. We believe that the more education a man has, if the substance and method of that education be first wisely settled, the better citizen he will be — nay, the better will he do even the humblest work assigned to him. If any discontent arises, it will be due not to the fact of the man's education, but to the PRIMARY INSTRUCTION. 12/ fact that he is educated beyond the level of his neighbours, and that, while raised by his ability and acquirements out of sympathy with the life of his fellow-labourers, he is nevertheless debarred from finding occupation more suited to his intellectual life, which he yet sees to be easily within the reach of men socially more fortunate than himself while in respect of education they are his inferiors. The question put before the country by the House of Lords is not at all whether the Department is trenching on the sphere of secondary education and spending money illegitimately. The Lords do not understand their own difficulty. The term "secondary" education is loosely and inaccurately used. The real point is — and some of the speakers seemed to be vaguely conscious of it — Up to what age is imperial revenue to be burdened with the cost of education for the poor ; and having determined this, how shall the time at the disposal of the child be used ? Are we at present using the time profitably and getting our money's worth .'' As a matter of fact, the school education of the masses of the population ends in the twelfth year ; nor is it likely, while poverty continues, that it will ever be otherwise. But surely it is the function of the State, always presuming that it has any educational function at all, to encourage the con- tinuance of school life as long as the pressing physical necessities of the poorer classes permit. The House of Lords (we refer to the reactionary members) may rest assured that in the present, or indeed any, con- 128 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. stitution of society, the prolongation beyond the twelfth year will not be great. The age of fifteen is not likely in any one case to be exceeded. The longer the period of school life is, the more fruitful is the result of the earlier years of training, and the more certainly will the level of intelligence of the humbler classes be raised — not only of those in- dividuals who benefit by the prolonged instruction, but (and this is the important point) of the whole social class to which they belong. Is it necessary at this time of day to argue that this is a matter of State concern .'' Nations are now industrial communities competing with each other, and the weapon with which they now compete, and must for the future compete, is intelligence. It is no longer an open question whether we are to rely on the intelligence, as well as on the moral and religious upbringings, of the operative classes : we vmst do so. Technical training in the various manufacturing industries can reach only the few, and we believe that infinitel}' more important than any amount of technical training is the general intelligence of the workman as that has been developed in the public school. Given a well-exercised, open mind, and the requisite technical knowledge and aptitude will be very easily acquired. A leading aim of the primary school, then, is the cultivation of the human intelligence, and we sincerely believe that this is not attainable under the restrictions which Mr. Lowe devised in the Revised Code of 1861, or those which Lord Shcrbrooke would now rcimpose. PRIMARY INSTRUCTION. 1 29 The meagre requirements of Mr. Lowe would probably cost as much to the State as a more liberal demand, and would bring back to society little or no return. It might with truth be maintained that the bare technical arts of reading, writing, and arithmetic are of less moment to the individual and the community than the assiduous cultivation of the intelligence, even to the comparative neglect of these arts. It is fortu- nately true that a certain amount of discipline is indirectly given in the course of learning to read and write, especially if good methods are employed ; but would not more of these accomplishments themselves be acquired were the daily instruction made subor- dinate to the training of the spiritual instrument by which they are acquired ? Lord Sherbrooke attempts to strengthen his position by giving us his experience of boys who had passed the sixth standard, and who could not act as his private readers in such a way as to make listening on his part an occu- pation either pleasing or profitable. So then we are to understand, by Lord Sherbrooke's own con- fession, that his policy has been a failure. We should have expected nothing else. Mr. Lowe in- structs boys in the deciphering of printed characters, and then complains that when all is over they cannot read to him satisfactorily blue-books or the " Fort- nightly." Why should they ? Reading aloud in any .sense other than the mere naming of vocables is an act of intelligence, and an act requiring an ever higher intelligence as the subject-matter of what is read K I30 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. grows in subtlety and complexity. Even with the help of more disciplined and better-informed minds, very few of the middle and upper classes can read in a style that satisfies at once the understanding and the ear of a cultivated listener. Probably, no accom- plishment is more conclusive evidence that a boy has been educated than the power of reading well. We are quite ready to agree with Lord Sherbrooke : good reading is more important than a knowledge of the elements of Latin or of electricity and magnetism ; and until the former is done, the latter may be left out of the curriculum of the people's schools. But how is reading, such as Lord Sherbrooke desiderates to be obtained .■' Only by familiarizing the mind with the subject-matter of books, and giving it command over the words of literature, and the ideas which those words denote. The House of Lords would not, we believe, object to this being done, but they are probably not aware that in accepting this as the standard of education, they aim very much higher than the promoters of a smattering of the specific or so-called " secondary " subjects do. Such a result is not to be attained except by a curriculum of in- struction, carefully adapted to the age of the pupils, in the realities of sense and of thought. The Education Code should aim at this, and not at the beggarly knowledge of the vocables of a reading-book which has been carefully restricted in its scope to secure for the pupil a Government " pass." l^ we ask next on what materials the intelligence PRIMARY INSTRUCTION. I3I of the young is to be led to exercise itself, vvc answer again, on the realities of sense and of thought. By the former we mean nature and man's relation to it, without any pretence to science and its (to children) barren terms and empty formulated expressions ; by the latter we mean the ideas and language of moral and religious truth, and of imaginative literature. It is only in this way that wc bring the young mind in direct contact with the substance of the mental life of all who have emerged above barbarism, and thereby prepare them for the future teachings of the lecture- room, the village library, and the church. By such instruction alone we awaken the intelligence and engage the moral affections of the young, and so best fit them for their future lives. Reading must accom- pany, or, at least, closely follow, the movements of the active opening mind ; and then, at whatever stage we have to part with the child, society will be the better for what we have done, and the child him- self will have received a start in a truly rational life, and have such consolations in the toils and vicissitudes of his humble career as an awakened spirit can give. To imagine that a boy so educated will be a worse ploughman or a worse man than if he had been left in the condition of dumb driven cattle, is to suppose a contradiction in thought and to despair of the future of humanity. To imagine, on the other hand, that we attain the human and humane ends of popular education by sprinkling the misunderstood terms of all the sciences through our schoolrooms is the very 132 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. folly and perversity of educational fanaticism. AH that such misapprehension of the relations of science to the work of the people's school can effect is the pretence of knowledge — a pretence as hurtful to the teacher as to the pupil, and certain to bring discredit on the very name of education. The training of the intelligence by presenting it with the food suited to its period of growth and which it can readily assimilate, is, however, after all, only a means to a higher end — the moral and religious education of the pupil. This, surely, is the supreme consideration in the case of each individual, and there- fore also in the people's school. We say moral and religious, for though we are far from denying that a certain moral education can be given without religion, we are satisfied that, deprived of the inspiration of religion and of the motives and aspirations of the spiritual life, the morality will be meagre, attenuated, and lifeless. The result, apart from all theological and ecclesiastical considerations, will not be satisfactory so far as the mere humanity of the child is concerned. It is melancholy to think that our religious strifes arc to shut out the child of the poor man (who is pro- foundly indifferent to them) from all that most deeply touches the heart and awakens the sentiment of man- kind. Is it reasonable that the children of the poor should be debarred from all that most surely furnishes consolation and hope in the chances and changes of this mortal life, because a few of the dogmas that have been erected on the broad human basis of our PRIMARY INSTRUCTION. 133 common Christianity arc distasteful to the illuminated and fanatical few ? The poor man and the struggling woman among the poor cannot be expected to find a substitute for religion in that self-complacent sense of superiority which suffices to sustain the heart of the intellectual Agnostic. The moral and religious in- tluencc which should pervade the life of the school, and which is quite compatible with the relegation of dogmatic teaching to a fixed hour, is, we regretfully admit, beyond the power of the State to produce at command. Aloral teaching it can, however, in any case require ; and for the rest it must rely on the general purport of its instructions to teachers and inspectors, but above all on the training which it gives to the teachers zuhoin it rears for the public service, and to the inspectors whom it appoints to supervise them. It may be possible to inspire both these agents. We have indicated the true work of the people's school. It does not change its character at any stage of the school curriculum. Whether the child leaves at the age of ten, twelve, or fourteen, the instruction he receives is still substantially the same as at the age of six. We believe that, so far, we carry with us Lord Norton, the Bishop of Exeter, and the majority of those who voted with them ; and we are quite certain that we have the assent of the few who have given time and study to the science and art of education. " Educational enthusiasts," where they have any knowledge of the repressive conditions under which the common school is worked, desire no 134 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. more than has been here sketched, and they will be content with no less. For such results our millions would indeed be well expended. But it is evident that to attain such results the Code of the Department must begin and end dif- ferently. It ought to lay down the material of in- struction, and the course of intellectual discipline, through which the child is to be carried from year to year. Infants — that is to say, all under seven years of age — have to be trained to the use of their observing powers, in ways which wc need not here specify in detail, but which are quite well understood. In the course of this training their minds would be brought into healthful contact with sensible objects, and a broad foundation laid for subsequent real studies. Satisfaction should also be given to the cravings of imagination and sentiment by means of child-literature and with the help of music. The moral and religious impressions made on the heart at this early stage would never in future years be obliterated — would never, because they coiUd never. The rudiments of reading, writing, and ciphering would not, of course, be omitted, but they would, we maintain, be more suc- cessfully taught by being held in subordination to the higher ends of intellectual discipline and moral train- ing. The successive years of school life simply repeat and expand and confirm the teachings of the infant school in ascending forms. The gradual additions to real knowledge made from year to year would, by the time the child had reached the sixth standard and the PRIMARY IXSTRUCTIOX. I35 age of thirteen, have brought him into intelh'gent relations with nature. Science in any form would be eschewed, but the more practical results of science would be intelligently apprehended. The Nature- knowledge to which we point would find its final expression in the primary school in such admirable statements of what is no\\- covered by the term " physical geography," as that of Professor Geikie, in his little shilling book on the subject ; while the laws of healthy living and the rudiments of an under- standing of social and economic conditions would also find their place. Moral training, conducted in a religious spirit and with a religious aim more or less explicit, arises daily, nay hourly, in connection with such teaching : it finds its opportunity in e\ery act of school-life, when the master is competent for his im- portant and delicate task. All this is quite practicable. Were it not practicable, popular education would be doomed to failure. With such a curriculum specific subjects which bear the illusory appearance of being " secondary " subjects would disappear, and the minds of the Lords would be tranquillized. There are indeed no specific subjects in education. Whatever it is im- possible to work into the ordinary' life of a primary or secondary school belongs to some other kind of institution. Specific subjects are for specific schools. Can any one doubt that a scheme of education such as that sketched above would result in a far more wide- spread intelligence, a far deeper interest in scientific truth and literary expression, and a far finer moral 136 THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS. spirit, than labouring against the grain in the dry teaching of words and technical details based on text- books constructed so as to teach the minimum which will earn a Government grant ? And how much more acceptable to the true teacher would a code conceived in so liberal a spirit be ! If it be said that there is not time for all this, the answer is that it can all be accomplished simply by using properly selected reading books, and by the oral teaching of the master in extension of the suggestions of these books, if he is supplied with proper apparatus, and, above all, properly trained.* Consider for a moment how the time is now spent that is not devoted to such studies and training. In " getting up " history so called, and grammar and geo- graphy, in the teaching of which every demand made by the Department is right in the teeth of all sound educational principle. Go into a school where the children are learning histor}', and you will find a huge black-board covered with the names of kings and battle-fields, and an accumulation of dates that would provoke the laughter of every cultivated mind not depraved by working the system. As to grammar, we have more than once met little ragged boys on the road not more than ten years of age with Morell's "Analysis" in their hands, and little girls of seven with their slates covered with lists of nouns ! As well * It may be (lilTicult and dangerous ff)r llic .State t