Ms 
 
 UC-NRLF 
 
 sB ml 'ii'? 
 
 GO 
 
 s 
 
THE LIBRARY 
 
 OF 
 
 THE UNIVERSITY 
 
 OF CALIFORNIA 
 
 PRESENTED BY 
 
 PROF. CHARLES A. KOFOID AND 
 
 MRS. PRUDENCE W. KOFOID 
 
Digitized by tine Internet Arciiive 
 
 in 2007 with funding from 
 
 IVIicrosoft Corporation 
 
 littp://www.archive.org/details/freechurchofscotOOmuilricli 
 
T s: :h3 
 
 mt mun\ of MntlanH 
 
 VIOLATING ITS CONSTITUTION : 
 
 BEING A NARRATIVE OF THE 
 
 I^ACTS OF THE ClUNY CaSE, 
 
 AND SHEWING THE 
 
 IISrSEOTTi^IT^5r OIF 
 
 MINISTER AND MEMBER FROM TYRANNY 
 
 IN THE 
 
 FREE CHURCH. 
 
 BY 
 
 JOHN^JIL, NETHER SAUCHEN, 
 
 CLUNY. 
 
 I>rit3e Sixpence ; by DPost, Sevenpenoe. 
 
S> 1^ M ^Aw lp 
 
 Having failed to secure a trial in the Church or Civil Courts, 
 it is necessary, for the purpose of vindicating myself, and ex- 
 posing the unprecedented treatment to which I have been 
 subjected, and which prevented me from conscientiously con- 
 tinuing longer in the Church, to publish an account of the 
 proceedings which ultimately led to my being declared " no 
 longer a member of the Free Church." 
 
 Another reason inducing me to again come before the pub- 
 lic, is, that a large number of people are comparatively igno- 
 rant of the circumstances which gave rise to the conduct of 
 the Presbytery and other church courts, superior and inferior ; 
 which appeared to me to be of the nature of lynch-law, and 
 altogether inconsistent with the constitution of the Free 
 Church. 
 

 VIOLATING ITS CONSTITUTION. 
 
 Having been connected, in various capacities, with the 
 Cluny Free Church since the Disruption, and as one of the 
 documents founded on by the Presbytery contains an im- 
 putation on my conduct as far back as 1856, in connection 
 with the first minister, I deem it necessary to give a brief 
 history of the congregation from its formation in 1843. 
 
 Previous to the Disruption, the parish minister of Cluny 
 being paralysed, had an ordained assistant. Before the 
 separation, the assistant would not say to which of the con- 
 tending parties he was favourable, and on being questioned 
 by several members of the congregation, he gave unsatisfactory 
 and impertinent answers. In consequence he was notrequested 
 to become Free Church minister at Cluny, and the congregation 
 was left without a minister to organise and consolidate it. 
 The first minister chosen had not been long ordained when 
 differences arose between him and the office-bearers as to the 
 appropriation of certain church-door collections, which he 
 claimed as supplementary to his stipend, but which they con- 
 sidered ought to be, in the circumstances, applied for the 
 purpose of liquidating the debt on the manse. So displeased 
 was the congregation, as well as the office-bearers at this claim 
 
 M367504 
 
being pressed, that the church-door collections soon fell off to 
 such an extent that they would not meet the current expen- 
 diture. The minister had also several disputes with various 
 members, including the congregational teacher and the office- 
 bearers ; and in 1852 he refused to carry out the unanimous 
 resolution of the Session anent the election of additional 
 elders, although he had explicitly agreed to do so. A petition 
 signed by all the office-bearers brought his conduct before the 
 Presbytery, but no resolution was arrived at then. About 
 three weeks after the petition had been presented, Rev. Mr. 
 Mackay, Echt, intimated from the pulpit of Cluny church a 
 meeting of the Deacons' Court, at which he attempted to get 
 the petition withdrawn, but as he could not produce authority 
 for doing so, he had to leave without accomplishing his object. 
 In 1856, the office-bearers presented another petition to the 
 Presbytery, because they believed " that the state of matters 
 in the congregation were such as to call for a Presbyterial 
 examination." The Presbytery granted the prayer of the 
 petition, and appointed the examination to take place on 23rd 
 July following. After fully enquiring into all circumstances, 
 they came to the conclusion that it was necessary for the 
 minister " to turn over a new leaf." They also recommended 
 me, between whom and the minister they alleged the differ- 
 ences had chiefly arisen, *' to withdraw in the meantime from 
 the Session and congregation of Cluny Church," * but they 
 knew quite well that this allegation was incorrect. On the 
 following Sabbath the minister misrepresented the findings 
 of the Presbytery from his pulpit. The office-bearers brought 
 this discrepency before the Presbytery, and after an interview 
 with that Court, he on the next Sabbath confessed publicly 
 
 * See Appendix "No. 8. 
 
that he had knowingly and wilfully misrepresented the de- 
 cisions of the Presbytery. He further stated that he had 
 been advised by his friends to make this humbling confession 
 " for Christ's sake and for peace's sake." 
 
 Shortly afterwards he called a congregational meeting for 
 "devotional purposes," at which he animadverted on the 
 conduct of the Presbytery. His friends then pledged them- 
 selves to leave the congregation should the Presbytery decline 
 to resile from some of its resolutions. The Presbytery did 
 not, and the minister's friends accordingly left the congregation. 
 The congregation being broken up, there were no church- 
 door collections, nor subscriptions to the Sustentation Fund, 
 and the Presbytery, along with assessors from the Synod, met 
 ^t Cluny and examined into the state of matters. They also 
 had a private conference with the minister, when he formally 
 demitted his charge, and left the Parish, but not before he 
 had been prosecuted and compelled to pay a debt which he 
 had allowed to lie over and accumulate for several years. 
 
 After the congregation had recovered to some extent from 
 its disorganisation, another minister was called, who, for a 
 period of upwards of ten years, laboured with acceptance in 
 the district, possessing the esteem and confidence not only of 
 his own congregation but also of the inhabitants in the dis- 
 trict. During this period there were peace and unanimity 
 in the Free Church congregation. In the close of the yeai* 
 1869,* an elder was determined in obtruding a case on the 
 Session. The minister and two elders thought they should 
 take no cognisance of it, but other three of the elders strongly 
 held an opposite opinion. The case was carried to the Pres- 
 bytery, when it was decided in accordance with the view which 
 
 * See Appendix No, 2, 
 
the minister had taken. Having been declared innocent, the 
 person who was accused took his place at the Lord's Table, 
 whereupon the disappointed elders and two deacons resigned, 
 and along with their relatives and dependants, left the (;on- 
 gregation. Thus at once the congregation was in a measure 
 broken up, and the contributions to the Sustentation Fund 
 again ceased. Though blameless, the amiable and devoted 
 minister was deeply grieved, but though so severely tried by 
 these men, his conduct was circumspect and conciliatory, and 
 in the circumstance the Session authorised him to state the 
 entire case to, and ask the advice of the Presbytery, which 
 he accordingly did on his own behalf, and in their name on 
 7th July, 1870. The Presbytery then appointed a deputation, 
 which met in the vestry of the Free Church, Cluny, and had 
 a conference with the office-bearers, who still held their 
 position in the Session and Deacon's Court, and with those 
 who had resigned. Mr. Mitchell, the minister, was excluded 
 from this meeting, and at its close he was told that he would 
 require to leave Cluny. The minister afterwards came to 
 understand that a letter communicated to the Presbytery by 
 Mr. K, Macdonald, factor, had been instrumental in evoking 
 their final decision. 
 
 After Mr. Mitchell demitted his charge, Rev. Mr. Mackay, 
 Echt, was appointed interim moderator of Session, and the office- 
 bearers who formerly resigned and deserted the congregation, 
 resumed office without re-election or induction, and in defiance 
 of the Practice of the Free Church. A committee of the con- 
 gregation was appointed to act along with the office-bearers 
 in procuring a supply for the pulpit, and a Probationer was 
 soon appointed by them, but the office-bearers and committee, 
 although the latter's term of office had previously expired, 
 took it upon them to dismiss him, which the congregation 
 
had only the right to do. A congregational meeting was held 
 for the purpose of considering the advisability of removing 
 the pulpit to a more convenient part of the church, altering 
 the pews and putting in a stove. An estimate of the cost of 
 these works was given, and the meeting sanctioned the under- 
 taking 3 but after it had been executed, at the request of the 
 Probationer, Mr. NicoU, very costly fittings were placed in 
 the pulpit, and other extra work of this nature brought the 
 expenditure far above the original estimate, as sanctioned by 
 the congregational meeting. About this time Mr. R. Macdonald 
 employed painters who had painted the Episcopal Chapel at 
 Cluny Castle, to paint the Church in such a fantastic and 
 ludicrous style that it was commonly remarked in the neigh- 
 bourhood that the Church resembled a Popish Chapel. 
 
 I wrote to the Deacons' Court on the 30th December, 
 1871,"^ pointing out that it was unfair to the congregation 
 for the committee to incur extra expenditure unauthorised, 
 and asserting that the sort of painting employed in the 
 Church was altogether wrong, both as being calculated to 
 awaken feelings and associations hurtful to the solemnity of 
 a Free Church congregation on Sabbath, and objectionable as 
 darkening the Church. The Court on receipt of my letter, 
 appointed one of its members to wait on me, and ascertain 
 what I proposed, and on 4th January, 1872, I wrotef saying 
 that if the painting on the wall behind the pulpit was made 
 similar or nearly so to that of the rest of the walls (defacing 
 the painted screen), I would not find fault with it or shew 
 further dissatisfaction. I also pointed out that the extra 
 expenditure on the pulpit ought to be defrayed by those who 
 incurred it, unauthorised by the congregation. The most 
 objectionable part of the painting was then defaced. 
 
 * See Appendix No. 0. t See Appendix No. 1. 
 
On seeing a notice in the Free Press, that a deputation of 
 office-bearers from Cluny "appeared to request the Presbytery 
 to take steps for enabling them to give a call to the Pro- 
 bationer presently labouring amongst them," and that " the 
 Presbytery resolved to do all in their power to carry out the 
 ■wishes of the congregation," I addressed a letter* to the 
 editor of that paper, stating that, on inquiry, I found that two 
 men who had re-assumed office, had taken it upon them to 
 appear at the Presbytery without having been appointed by 
 a congregational meeting. The conejregation was not only 
 ignorant of what they were doing at the Presbytery, but it 
 did not even know that they were there, consequently the 
 deputation was not in a position either creditable or honourable 
 to itself, or beneficial to the congregation. This letter was 
 not published in the Free Press, but was printed for private 
 circulation. Soon after this, a meeting was held for the 
 piu-pose of ascertaining the mind of the congregation, and if 
 favourable to the election of a Probationer, t<y appoint a de- 
 putation to appear before the Presbytery, as it was found that 
 the former deputation had acted entirely on its own responsi- 
 bility. At this meeting the moderator (Mr. Mackay), held 
 me up to the contempt of the congregation, and encouraged 
 others to abuse me, but would not allow me to speak in self- 
 defence, alleging that I had no right to speak, and that I 
 was " at the bar." He denfed that " Moncriefi''s Practice of 
 the Free Church " was sanctioned, and said that I was a 
 " hopeless sinner, and would not end well." To vindicate 
 myself I addressed a letter to the President of the meeting. 
 
 On the 7th March, 1872, I petitioned the Session to in- 
 vestigate ^fama about Mr. Ranald Macdonald, factor, Cluny 
 
 * See Appendix No. 2. 
 
Castle, one of the deacons, in relation to a breach of the seventh 
 commandment, on the ground that the fama was known to 
 the office-bearers. I was not allowed to be present at the 
 meetings of Session, in reference to my petition, but was in- 
 formed by the Session Clerk, that the Session had appointed 
 their Moderator to wait on Mr. Macdonald (who furnished 
 the Session with letters from his wife, his servant girls, and 
 his shoemaker. He further informed me that the Session 
 had come to be unanimously of the opinion that Mr. Mac- 
 donald was innocent. This finding was subsequently com- 
 municated to me by letter, and then at a meeting of Session 
 at which I was present. On the last occasion I protested and 
 appealed against the decision, and craved extracts for reasons 
 to be given in.* The extracts were not furnished to me. 
 Having been cited to this meeting on the ground that business 
 was to be transacted in which I was interested, I was asked 
 if I had said that Mr. Williamson, elder, had two illegitimate 
 children before his marriage, and on declining to answer, the 
 Moderator cited me to a meeting of the Presbytery to be held 
 at Aboyne on 27th of the same month. I protested that it 
 was irregular to cite me until I was informed in writing for 
 what reason, and Mr. Mackay then ordered me " out at the 
 door." Although the citation was informal, I waved all 
 objections and appeared at the meeting. The Moderator of 
 Session (Mr. Mackay) brought Mr. Macdonald's fama before 
 the Presbytery, and after reading several letters accounting 
 for the origin of the fama, asserted in defiance of these letters 
 that I had originated it. I told him it was a lie ; upon which 
 the Presbytery expressed great displeasure, and urged me to 
 withdraw the expression, which I accordingly did, but said, 
 "it is a lie yet." 
 
 * See Appendix No. 5. 
 
10 
 
 At the next 'meeting of the Presbytery, held for the purpose 
 of considering the reference by Mr. Mackay against me, I 
 petitioned the Presbytery to allow me to prove that Mr. 
 Mackay's statement that I originated Mr. Macdonald's /ama 
 was a " groundless, barefaced, slanderous lie," but the petition 
 was dismissed, and I protested and appealed to the Synod. 
 When this appeal came before the Synod, I was asked by 
 Principal Lumsden if I realised the responsibility of using 
 such language to the Moderator of Session ; I said, I did. He 
 then asked if I meant to say that Mr. Mackay knew that he 
 was telling a lie. I answered that I " did not know what 
 amount of brains he had, but if I had made a similar state- 
 ment in similar circumstances, I would have known that I 
 was telling a lie." My appeal was dismissed by the Synod, 
 and this explanation accepted as satisfactory. 
 
 At the meeting of Presbytery on 27th March, after con- 
 sideration of Mr. Macdonald's fama, Mr. Mackay brought 
 forward a pretended reference from the Session, to get me 
 put out of the Church, but it was not taken up. I was in- . 
 duced to bring forward witnesses to a pro re nata meeting to 
 be held at Torphins on the following week, to meet the 
 allegations in the reference. I had at that time got no copy 
 of the reference, although I had asked it from the Presbytery, 
 and from its clerk at his own house. Mr. Mackay read an 
 entirely different reference at this second meeting, but it was 
 not taken up, neither was I informed when it would be again 
 before the Presbytery, and although I had nine witnesses in 
 attendance, not one of them was examined. These witnesses 
 seeing the state of matters, signed a petition along with me 
 to the Synod, of which the following is the tenor : — 
 
11 
 
 To the moderator and other members of the Free Synod 
 of Aberdeen. The humble Petition of the under- 
 signed who were present at the meeting of Presby- 
 tery at Torphins, on the 2nd inst., sheweth 
 
 1st. That for months past there has been a/ama about Mr. 
 Macdonald, deacon, widely circulated in the district. 
 
 2nd. That John Muil lodged a petition with the Kirk-Ses- 
 sion of the Free Church, Cluny, on the 7th March, last, in 
 reference to said /ama. 
 
 3rd. That the Moderator and the Session-Clerk insulted 
 John Muil in reference to the petition, and, besides prevent- 
 ing him from being present at meetings of Session held in 
 reference to his petition, the Session withheld extracts when 
 he protested and appealed 
 
 4th. That when the case came before the Presbytery (in 
 some way), Mr. ^lackay (moderator of the Session) asserted 
 that John Muil had originated and circulated the fama, which 
 assertion John Muil declared to be a " gToundless barefaced 
 slanderous lie," and prayed the Presbytery to allow him to 
 lead proof against it. 
 
 5th. That the prayer of the petition was not granted ; but 
 the Presbytery gave their permission to Mr. Mackay to recall 
 the statement that John Muil had *^ originated " the fama, 
 while John Muil said that he declined to allow him to recall 
 it, as it seemed to be actionable. 
 
 6th. That ]\Ir. Mackay further said, that John Muil had 
 re-originated or " resuscitated " and circulated the fama, and 
 that John Muil having denied that he did so, and as the clerk 
 would not state in the minute that he denied it, John Muil 
 took the Presbytery witnesses. 
 
 7th. That the assertion that the Presbytery had " evidence 
 
12 
 
 by Mr. Muil's own admission at last meeting that he had cir- 
 culated the report in a printed letter, was untrue ; that the 
 printed letter referred to was a congregational letter, addres- 
 sed to the president of the late congregational meeting, and 
 sent by John Muil to only twelve people, all members of the 
 congregation, who, he had reason to believe, knew that there 
 was a fama, and that there was no expression in the letter to 
 circulate anything about the fama applying to Mr. R. Mac- 
 donald more than to any other member of the congregation, 
 and any person seeing the letter, and ignorant of the fama, 
 would at once see that the statement that the letter circulated 
 the fama about Mr. Macdonald, was untrue. 
 
 8th. That it appears to your petitioners, that the Session, 
 or rather the Moderator, and J. Edwards, and A. Williamson 
 were more anxious to gag John Muil, and to throw discredit on 
 him, and even to get him out of the Church, than to have the 
 fama competently investigated, and that your petitioners feel 
 called upon, in the circumstances, to approach yOur reverend 
 Court, and state it to be their conviction that there was 
 urgent need for bringing the fama before the church courts 
 that it might be fully and faithfully examined into. 
 
 9th. That a thorough investigation would vindicate the 
 Church, and promote the interests of truth and justice in the 
 district. 
 
 May it therefore please your reverend body to take the 
 premises into consideration, and institute a faithful and full 
 examination of the grounds of the fama in the interests of 
 truth and justice, that the Church may be vindicated, and 
 all cause of discredit from reports about \\iq fama be removed 
 from the congregation of Cluny. 
 
 This petition was subscribed by six members and office- 
 bearers of the Cluny Free Church, and three others. After 
 
13 
 
 being considered by the Synod, I resolved, od the advice of 
 several of its members, to withdraw it. 
 
 On 7th May, I attended a meeting of Presbytery to present 
 the following petition : — 
 
 To the Eeverend, the moderator, and other ^'members of 
 the Free Presbytery of Kincardine 0*Neil, the 
 humble petition of the undersigned, sheweth 
 
 Ist. That Mr. John Edward, elder, and Mr. Ranald Mac- 
 donald, deacon, of the Free Church congregation of Cluny, 
 resigned office by writing, under their hands, on or about the 
 month of March, 1870, and then left the congregation in a 
 way unjustly, tending to disorganize it and break it up. 
 
 2nd. That after the congregation had been broken up in a 
 measure, they re-assumed office, without re-election or induc- 
 tion, contrary to the laws of the Church, and to the discredit 
 of the congregation. 
 
 3rd. That though the unpropriety of re-assuming office 
 has been repeatedly brought under their notice, they continue 
 to act in their assumed capacity. 
 
 4th. That there has, for a considerable time, been a fama 
 about Mr. Macdonald, in relation to a breach of the seventh 
 commandment, so widely known, that his remaining in office, 
 as at present, is still further a reproach to the Church ; and 
 that the Session have failed to investigate the fama in a way 
 fitted to elicit the truth, and to promote the ends of justice 
 by making apparent, with certainty, either his guilt or his 
 innocence. 
 
 5th. That your petitioners believe that for vindicating the 
 Church, and setting Mr. Macdonald right with the congrega- 
 tion and the public, that the Presbytery should legally exa- 
 
14 
 
 mine Miss Barbara Ellis, Westside, Kingsford, Alford ; Miss 
 Helen Brown, Dalheric, Cluny ; Mr. James Bremner, Bethlen, 
 Midmar ; Mr. Morrison, auctioneer, TuUynessle ; and Mrs. 
 John Smith, Bridge of Alford, Alford. 
 
 May it therefore please the Presbytery to take the premises 
 into consideration, and to take measures to secure that Messrs. 
 Edward and Macdonald shall cease to be Office-bearers, as at 
 present ; and also to take steps that the fama about Mr. 
 Macdonald shall be investigated by thorough examination, so 
 as to make the truth about it apparent. 
 
 This petition was signed by two office-bearers, and three 
 members of the Cluny Free Church. 
 
 To the Keverend, the moderator, and the other mem- 
 bers of the Free Presbytery of Kincardine O'Neil, 
 the humble petition of the undersigned, sheweth 
 
 1st. That Mr. Andrew Williamson, elder, in the Free 
 Church congregation at Cluny, resigned office by writing, 
 under his hand, on 5th June, 1870, and then left the con- 
 gregation in a way unjustly, tending to disorganize it and 
 break it up. 
 
 2nd. That after the congregation had been broken up in a 
 measure, he re-assumed office without re-election or induc- 
 tion, contrary to the laws of the Church, and to the discredit 
 of the congregation. 
 
 3rd. That though the unpropriety of re-assuming office 
 thus, has been repeatedly brought under his notice, he con- 
 tinues to act in his assumed capacity. 
 
 May it therefore please the Presbytory to take the premises 
 into consideration, and to take measures to secure that Mr. 
 A. Williamson shall cease to be an office-bearer, as at present. 
 
15 
 
 This petition contained the signatures of an office-bearer 
 and two members of the Free Church. Having previously 
 presented a petition to the Presbytery complaining of the Eev. 
 Mr. Mackay and Andrew Williamson, it was taken up at this 
 meeting ; but, after being considered, it was dismissed, while 
 the two other petitions which I presented that day, were not 
 received. I protested and appealed to the General Assembly, 
 and craved extracts and copies, which were granted. Mr. 
 NicoU, the probationer at Cluny, and ^Mr. Macdonald had 
 exerted themselves successfully to get parties who had s.igned 
 petitions to the Synod and Presbytery to delete their names. 
 They had called on a widow, and by engaging in prayer with 
 her, and working on her feelings, they succeeded in getting 
 her to induce her son, a deacon, to ride in haste to the rail- 
 way station, and telegraph to withdraw his name from a 
 petition at the Synod, an hour after the meeting of Synod 
 closed. Mr. Macdonald also succeeded in getting one of his 
 employers tenants to withdraw his name from the petition to 
 the Presbytery, and made application to another, in vain. 
 This tenant, a deacon in the Cluny congregation, was refused 
 trees on the estate, before he was solicited to delete his name. 
 Afterwards, he got trees, and paid them before the meeting 
 of Presbytery, as he thought they might be higher charged 
 after it. The nature of the fama may be conceived from the 
 number and magnitude of th^ efforts Mr. Macdonald made, 
 to strangle, in their birth, attempts at investigation. At 
 this meeting, Mr. Mackay brought forward a different refer- 
 ence* from each of the two preceding ones. Although I got 
 no notice that it was to be taken up, on its being read, I was, 
 on the motiont of Rev. T. Murray, Midmar, suspended from 
 the membership of the Church dve die. 
 
 * See Appendix No. 10. f See Appendix No. 11. 
 
u 
 
 Not to martyr me. it was said an opening was left in the 
 motion to let me into the Church again, by onli/ becoming a 
 pious hypocritical liar. The four reverend brethern, to escape 
 martyrdom, might have had no difficulty with their own 
 terms, but to me they were unsurmountable. Though fall- 
 ible — godly ministers, men of ability, common sense and de- 
 votedness, are pre-eminently the salt of the earth, the medium 
 of the richest blessings, and well worthy of the much higher 
 Stipends sought and needed. Godless ministers — reverend 
 rogues, as seen at Rhynie, Stobhill, Gargunnock, and else- 
 where, are, owing either to Satanic influence, or extreme 
 natural corruption, a disgrace to religion, and a curse to the 
 Church — misleading the foolish, and grieving the wise and 
 good. I had told truths about " office-bearers and others " 
 whom the two highlanders, Murray and Mackay, favoured, 
 and, therefore, the " brethren " put me out of the Church on 
 the one hand, and kept them and their fama in, on the other, 
 without investigation. Ministers in the Presbytery put me 
 out, and the inferior courts must be protected. Where would 
 spiritual liberty be, if ministers could not act as they like 1 
 Independent of laws, they had subscribed, and irrespective of 
 all moral responsibility, and other people's civil rights. 
 
 Mr. Murray afterwards stated, that he was determined to 
 put me out of the Church, as " Mr. Macdonald had once done 
 him a favour." I protested and appealed to the General 
 Assembly for reasons'^ to be given in, and craved extracts 
 and copies ; but I did not receive any of them in due time 
 to allow me to bring my case before the then ensuing meeting 
 of Assembly. Instead of furnishing me with extracts, the 
 Presbytery clerk, Mr. Reid, sent me a private letter, request- 
 
 * See Appendix No. 9. 
 
17 
 
 ing me to meet him with iny friends, to patch up matters in 
 an underhand way ; the Session clerk, Andrew WilUamson, 
 by same post, threatening me, through his agent, with prose- 
 cution for slander. I took no notice of either of these com- 
 munications. Though Mr. Keid disobeyed the Presbytery in 
 refusing to furnish extracts to the Assembly of 1872, and 
 though the Presbytery did not obtemper the order of As- 
 sembly, 1873, he, on my being declared no longer " a member 
 of the Free Church," threatened me with prosecution for 
 four times the amount he had himself formerly alleged I was 
 due for extracts. This he did after he knew that the extracts 
 had been useless to me, through his cheating me, under pre- 
 tence of friendship. In answer to a letter seeking extracts, 
 he should have previously given, he refused the extracts after- 
 wards ordered by the Assembly, and said they were not due, 
 but he prayed for me in his letter in a " suitable prayer." I 
 have been told that I should not expose ministers and Mac- 
 donald. It is myself and the Church I seek to vindicate, and 
 if they have stept out of their way to intercept me, they, if 
 hurt, have themselves to blame. 
 
 Being prevented from getting to the Asssmbly, by the dila- 
 toriness of the Presbytery in supplying any part of the ex- 
 tracts, and withholding the most important documents alto- 
 gether, I decided to leave the F^oe Church, could I have 
 shewn to another church the grounds on which I had been 
 suspended ; and, for this purpose, I wrote the Presbytery 
 clerk for copies of the documents on which the Presbytery 
 had grounded their decision, but he declined to give them. 
 
 Being refused the extracts formally granted by them at 
 their meeting, I was compelled to petition the Synod to order 
 the subordinate court to furnish me with copies of the docu- 
 ments on which its judgment was founded, to get its decision 
 reviewed. 
 
18 
 
 I received the two following letters at this time, and I give 
 them here to shew that I am not the only person displeased 
 at the conduct of the Presbytery : — 
 
 Moat, Auchterless, 
 
 30th September, 1872. 
 Mr. John Muil, 
 
 Dear Sir, 
 
 Hearing that you are to apply to the Synod in regard to the deci- 
 sion of the Presbytery in suspending you from Church membership, 
 I beg to say, for the information of the Synod, that Mr. Mackay did 
 not consult the Session about calling you to the meeting of Session 
 held on 19th March last, and you were not called by its authority, 
 but by his. When you appeared, the only question Mr. Mackay 
 asked you, was, if you had said that Mr. Williamson had two illegi- 
 timate children before he was married. You declined to answer, 
 saying you were willing to meet any charge brought against you. 
 Mr. Mackay then cited you to the Presbytery on 27th March, at 
 Aboyne. You said it was unlawful to site you without telling you 
 in writing the charges brought against you when he ordered you 
 ** out at the door." Mr. Mackay's written reference was not sub- 
 mitted to the Session, and contained statements that I never heard 
 of, and it does not seem to me that there was anything objectionable 
 in your letters on congregational matters. 
 I am. Dear Sir, 
 
 Yours truly, 
 (Signed) Wm. Garrie, Elder. 
 
 Cluny, 1st October, 1872. 
 Dear Sir, 
 
 In view of your applying to the Synod to revoke the decision of 
 the Presbytery of Kincardine O'Neil on 7th May last, we beg to state, 
 for the information of the Synod, that Mr. Mackay read a reference 
 containing charges against you at the meeting of Presbytery on 27th 
 March last, when you demanded a copy, and were induced by the 
 
19 
 
 moderator and the clerk to cite witnesses to meet it at Torphins, on 
 2nd April last. A copy of the reference was withheld, though you 
 had asked it from the clerk at his own house. Nine witnesses ap- 
 peared at the meeting at Torphins, but not one of them was examined. 
 Mr. Mackay, at this meeting, read another reference ; and, in an- 
 swer to a question from the clerk, he said it was different from the 
 reference he had read at the former meeting. The Presbytery decided 
 at this meeting that you would get a copy of the reference before it 
 was taken up, but did not decide when it would be taken up. At 
 the meeting of Presbytery on 7th May last, Mr. Mackay read an- 
 other reference, but quite different from the other two, and we have 
 learned that neither of the three had been before the Session of Cluny, 
 though professing to be references from it. Mr. Mackay made a 
 most offensive and irrelevant speech about his reference, and the 
 Presbytery, without taking evidence, or calling for any evidence, 
 decided to suspend you from Church membership. Mr. Murray, the 
 mover of the motion which led to the decision, was heard telling one 
 of his hearers that he was determined to put " you out of the Church, 
 as Mr. Macdonald had once done him a favour." 
 
 Though the decision professed to suspend you, it virtually excom- 
 municated you, as you could not be restored to the fellowship of the 
 Church according to this decision, without satisfying the Session that 
 you "had genuine repentance" for telling the truth. We beg fur- 
 ther to say, that all your letters read at the Presbytery, contained 
 the truth, and nothing but the truth, and appeared to us to be un- 
 objectionable. 
 
 We are. Dear Sir, 
 
 Yours truly, 
 (Signed) William Downie, Linton, Cluny. 
 
 William Kennedy, Kinnernie. 
 
 James Milne, Deacon. 
 Mr. John Muil, 
 
 Nether Sauchen, Cluny. 
 
 The Synod refused to grant the prayer of the petition, and 
 I protested and appealed to the General Assembly ; but the 
 Synod refused to minute my appeal. I petitioned the Gene- 
 
20 
 
 ral Assembly to order the Presbytery to furnish the extracts 
 referred to, as the Synod had refused ; and also to order an 
 extract of the petition which I had presented to the Presby- 
 tery, complaining of Mr. Mackay*s and A. Williamson's con- 
 duct. The Assembly instructed " the Presbytery to furnish 
 me with such extracts and documents founded on in their 
 sentence of suspension, as I might ask, inasmuch as it did 
 not appear from the judgment of the Presbytery, on what 
 documents their sentence proceeded." I accordingly applied 
 for the documents " produced and read " by Mr. Mackay in 
 support of his pretended reference. I got some of the ex- 
 tracts ; but, a letter which initiated the whole proceedings 
 on my part, of which the Presbytery complained, and which 
 was, in some measure, a key to the other documents, w^as 
 withheld, and extract of petition refused. 
 
 As there appeared to be no possibility of obtaining these 
 documents, although legally entitled to them as my civil right, 
 and as no wise interfering with the spiritual elem.ent, I raised 
 actions in the Sheriff Court, for the purpose of compelling the 
 Presbytery to furnish it, and also an extract of the petition, 
 complaining of the conduct of Mackay and Williamson. At 
 a meeting of the Synod held on 14th April, 1874, 1 presented 
 a petition, craving it to restore me to fall membership ; but, 
 instead of considering the merits of, or the statement in the 
 petition, they, on an admission by me to an interrogatory of 
 their own, that I had applied to the civil court to compel the 
 Presbytery to give these documents, expelled me from the 
 Church. I protested and appealed to the General Assembly, 
 for the following reasons : — 
 
 The appellant protested and appealed to the General As- 
 sembly on the following grounds, viz. : — 
 
 1st. The petition was not taken up as stated in the extract 
 
«1 
 
 minute of Synod, and the procedure of the Synod was in- 
 formal and unconstitutional, inasmuch as the clerk of the 
 Synod did not first read — in fact did not read at all — the 
 papers transmitted to the Synod by the Committee on Bills. 
 
 2nd. The Synod did not consider the question of the suffi- 
 ciency of the document, to bring the case before the court, 
 or that all parties had been duly cited. 
 
 3rd. The Synod were thus acting in violation of the pro- 
 cedure of the Free Church Courts, and the appellant respect- 
 fully refers the General Assembly on this point to page 59 of 
 " Moncreiff^s Practice." 
 
 4th. The Synod had no right to interrogate the appellant, 
 and any answers given by him to the questions put, was in- 
 admissable against him, even though at another place and 
 time it might have been that the inference drawn by the 
 Synod was a correct one, because the questions put to him 
 had no connection with the papers lodged by him, and were, 
 therefore, altogether irrelevant. It is further stated that the 
 appellant was not bound to answer the questions put to him, 
 but he did so, on the ground he has all along maintained, 
 that his recourse to the civil magistrate was not a question 
 of Ecclesiastical discipline, but of securing documents to be 
 paid for in money ; that the procedure adopted by the Church 
 in administering that discipline, should be followed out in a 
 pure and legal way, by considering documents to which he 
 had a legal right, and which were indispensable. His appli- 
 cation, therefore, to the Sheriff, is not a question of Church, 
 but of civil law. 
 
 5th. The sentence of expulsion passed by the Synod was 
 altogether appressive and unconstitutional ; in respect, it 
 displayed a spirit of harshness altogether unbecoming a 
 Christian Church. No opportunity was allowed the appejlant 
 
22 
 
 to argue the right, or the grounds for the Synod to do so, and 
 the procedure was, in the first instance, a breach of legal pro- 
 cedure and fair play, and, in the second instance, an assump- 
 tion of papal arrogance. 
 
 6th. It is specially provided by Section 3 of Chap, xxiii. of 
 the Confession of Faith, the foundation of the Free Church 
 principles, that " the civil magistrate hath authority, and it 
 is his duty to take order that all corruptions and abuses in 
 worship and discipline may be prevented." The proceedings 
 of the appellant, so far as the civil courts are concerned, are 
 within the scope of the above provision, as will appear from 
 the following four statements : — 
 
 7th. On or about the 23rd May, 1873, the appellant pre- 
 sented a petition to the General Assembly, with reference to 
 his suspension from Church membership, in which suspsnsiou, 
 as the petition alleged, the Presbytery of Kincardine O'Neil 
 refused, in defiance of their own resolution, to -furnish him 
 with full extracts, and, on which petition, the General As- 
 sembly, by deliverance of 26th May, same year, instructed 
 the Presbytery of Kincardine O'Neil " to gi'ant such extracts 
 or documents grounded on in their sentence of suspension, as 
 he (the appellant) might crave." 
 
 8th. The appellant, under the authority of said deliverance, 
 applied to the Presbytery to furnish him with an extract of 
 a letter written by him on 30th December, 1871,* to Mr. 
 John Edward, a member of the Deacons' Court, to be com- 
 municated to that court ; which letter was the principle 
 document on which that sentence proceeded, and without 
 production of which it is impossible for the present appellant 
 to bring the foresaid sentence of suspension under the review 
 of your reverend body. To enable him to obtain this extract, 
 
 * See Appendix No. 0. 
 
23 
 
 and thus lay before your body the whole documents and ex- 
 tracts relative to the procedure and sentence of the Presby- 
 tery against him, the appellant had recourse to the civil 
 magistrate, and he thinks not without cause, inasmuch as 
 the General Assembly had ordered the Presbytery to furnish 
 the extracts, by withholding which, the Presbytery were thus 
 acting in violation of their own resolution, the sentence of 
 the highest Ecclesiastical court, and the principles of the 
 Free Church, as embodied in the aforesaid Confession of Faith. 
 9th. The appellant, on or about 7th May, 1872, presented 
 a petition relative to the status of Mr. Andrew Williamson, 
 farmer. Mains of Corsindae ; and, on or about the same date, 
 the appellant presented to the said Presbytery of Kincardine 
 O'Neil, a petition, with five signatures, relative to the status 
 of Mr. John Edward, and Mr. Ranald Macdonald, as having 
 assumed office in defiance of the "practice of the Free Church," 
 and further, in relation to ^a fama (of assault with intent) 
 about Mr. R. Macdonald, which the petitioners alleged the 
 Free Kirk-Session of Cluny had failed to investigate in a way 
 to prove either his guilt or his innocence. That the petitioners 
 prayed the Presbytery to prevent the foresaid Messrs. Andrew 
 Williamson, John Edward, and Ranald Macdonald, from con- 
 tinuing to hold office, and to investigate Mr. Macdonald's/ama 
 thoroughly, by legally examining five witnesses named. And 
 your appellant has reason to believe that his lu-ging the 
 Presbytery to investigate said fama, was a principal reason 
 for the Presbytery suspending him from Church membership, 
 while the fama, still uninvestigated, is a stigma on the Church, 
 and the Presbytery is blamable for not enquiring into said 
 fama. That, on or about 7th May, 1872, the appellant also 
 presented a petition to said Presbytery, complaining of the 
 proceedings of Rev. Donald Mackay, Free Church minister of 
 
24 
 
 Echt, as interim moderator of the Kirk-Session of Cluny, and 
 also of the said Andrew Williamson. The Presbytery refused 
 the prayer of this last petition. The appellant protested and 
 appealed to the General Assembly, and craved extracts, which 
 were granted. 
 
 10th. In virtue of the Presbytery's resolution, and of the 
 practice of the Free Church, the appellant requested an ex- 
 tract of the petition last referred to, but hitherto delivery has 
 been withheld. To secure this extract, with the view of 
 bringing the whole conduct and proceedings of Presbytery 
 under appeal to your body, the appellant has also had recourse 
 to the civil power. 
 
 11th. In the circumstances, it is humbly submitted that 
 the appellant is acting within his rights as a member of the 
 Free Church of Scotland, and in terms of its standard, the 
 Confession of Faith. 
 
 12th. Matters stood in the position specified, when the 
 appellant presented a petition to the Bills Committee, for 
 transmission to the Free Synod of Aberdeen, at its meeting 
 there on 14th April, 1874, setting forth the circumstance 
 and procedure of the Presbytery of Kincardine O'Neil in sus- 
 pending him from Church fellowship, and craving the Synod 
 to re-instate him as a member of the Church, in respect the 
 procedure of the Presbytery was without cause and due con- 
 sideration of premises. 
 
 13th. The Committee on Bills transmitted this petition to 
 the Synod, but the Synod did not read it nor consider it. 
 Interrogatories were put to appellant, with the view, as stated 
 by Principal Lumsden, one of their members, to ascertain the 
 standing of the appellant at the bar of the Synod. The in- 
 terrogatories were answered by the appellant to the effect 
 before narrated in articles 7, 8, 9, and 10, hereof. It was 
 
25 
 
 immediately thereafter moved, and carried, that " the Synod 
 find and declare that Mr. Muil is no longer a member of this 
 Church." The appellant was held, in a sense, to have no 
 status so far as the petition then before the Synod was con- 
 cerned, which was ignored, and was not allowed to be heard 
 thereon ; while the Synod held he had a status sufficient to 
 expel him from the Church. It is submitted that the pro- 
 cedure was somewhat an anomaly, and was not altogether, 
 with due defence to the Synod, " above-board." The appel- 
 lant submits that he has not done anything wrong, incompe- 
 tent or unconstitutional ; that he was actuated by a desire 
 to promote the purity of the Church ; and he has reason to 
 believe that it was his urging the Presbytery to take action 
 to remedy, what appeared to be, and was, wrong, which in- 
 duced the Presbytery, in the first instance to suspend him, 
 and in the second, the Synod to excommunicate him. 
 
 The object of the present appeal and protest is to secure 
 for the appellant an unbiassed consideration of his whole case, 
 because several members of Presbytery were also members of 
 Synod, and took part in the discussion, and have a strong 
 personal feeling in connection with the case. 
 
 14th. For these reasons, the appellant submits that the 
 procedure of the Synod was irregular and oppressive, and 
 ought to be recalled, and the appellant res^- :,red to his status 
 in the Church. 
 
 In respect whereof. 
 
 (Signed) John Muil. 
 Nether Sauchen, 
 
 20th April, 1874. 
 
 I certify that this is a true copy. 
 
 (Signed) James Sutherland, Synod Clerk. 
 
26 
 
 I at the same time presented a petition to the Assembly, 
 of which the following is an extract : — 
 
 That the Synod and the Presbytery, composed mostly of 
 ministers, have been contending for lawless licence in dealing 
 with your petitioner, and it appears to him that it is especi- 
 ally imprudent in Ministers and Church Courts to do so at 
 present, seeing that they have manifested, to the injury of 
 the Church views and principles, so antagonistic as to call 
 for petitions signed by one hundred and twenty-three thou- 
 sand members of the Church, and when it is allowed and 
 lamented that the labours of the ministry are partially abor- 
 tive, and the need for increased contributions to its support 
 so urgent. 
 
 That the attempts made to drive your petitioner beyond 
 the pale of the Church were unwarranted by the constitution 
 of the Church, and inimical to her prosperity, which depends 
 not only on the efforts of the ministers, but also upon the 
 sympathy and co-operation of the lay members, whose rights 
 have been menaced by the procedure against your petitioner, 
 and, so far as he is able to judge, ministers are opposed to 
 your petitioner, and it is said, persecute him, while laymen 
 sympathise with him, as in some measure fighting the battle 
 of freedom for the exercise of constitutional rights. 
 
 That your petitioner, in conclusion, would seek to draw the 
 attention of the Assembly to the tenor of protest and appeal 
 presented and lodged by your petitioner simul et semel with 
 present petition, for a full narrative of the whole procedure 
 in connection with the case, and that with the object of the 
 prayer of the petition- 
 May it therefore please the Assembly to take the whole 
 case, as well as the appeal against the Synod's decision into 
 your consideration, restore your petitioner to his full status 
 
27 
 
 in the Church, and deal with the Synod and Presbytery as 
 their unwarrantable procedure may seem to deserve. 
 And your petitioner will ever pray. 
 
 (Signed) John Muil. 
 Nether Sauchen, 
 
 8th May, 187 4- 
 
 After considerable discussion, the Assembly authorised the 
 Presbytery, unless they should be informed under my hand 
 before their meeting in July, that the action in the Sheriff 
 Court was withdrawn — to pronounce sentence, declaring me 
 " no longer a member of the Free Church." 
 
 Knowing the contrary, Mr. Reid repeatedly stated to the 
 Assembly what was incorrect. I emphatically contradicted 
 him. But a leader. Dr. Rainy, in his motion stated what 
 was also incorrect, being, like a better man — Barnabas — led 
 away by dissimulation ; and as there was no one with Paul's 
 talents, integrity, and energy to withstand him to the face, 
 because he was to be blamed, the Assembly foolishly agreed 
 to his motion, in which he said the Presbytery had given me 
 extracts aright, and acted const itut ion f^Uy in putting me out 
 of the Church, on a forged reference of untruths, without 
 allowing me an opportunity of trying to rebut. 
 
 My case came up for debate before Sheriff Comrie Thomson, 
 on the 13th June, and on 15th July his Lordship gave de- 
 cision, in which he dismissed the actions and mulcted me in 
 
 On the same date (15th July), a meeting of the Free Pres- 
 bytery of Kincardine O'Neil was held in the vestry of the 
 Free Church, Aboyne, at which I was present, and handed 
 the following printed letter to the moderator : — 
 
28 
 
 Nether Sauchen, 
 
 nth July, 1874. 
 (To he communicated). 
 
 To tlie Reverend Donald Stuart, Moderator of the Free Presbytery 
 of Kincardine O'Neil. 
 Rev. Sir, 
 
 By four ministers, a small fraction of your Presbytery, I 
 was, on a forged reference, without a trial, slanderously branded, 
 and banished, aye and until I should be evolved into a hypocritical 
 liar. Galileo was pat out of the church of Rome, like me out of the 
 Free Church, for telling truth. He could get in again by merely 
 becoming a liar ; but the four ministers must have me a pious liar 
 before I get in. The four are clerical monstrosities, and it might be 
 well to vivisect them in the interest of the genus rogues. To do so 
 would not be cruel, as they lack sensibility, when they could disgrace 
 the Church by so savagely mauling and mangling me. One of them 
 gave a lame ordination address, and the Presbytery jeered him for it. 
 To show how able it was, he published a quite different one ! It is 
 said he is so foolish as to preach without preparation — habbering and 
 thumping the Bible to pieces, till he find expression for his crude 
 ideas. He was, he said, " determined to put me out of the Church, 
 as Mr. Macdonald had once done him a favour." In gratitude to a 
 man with a f ama of assaults with intent, he did not stick at disgracing 
 the Church by gross injustice to me, and yet (modest man !) he seeks 
 " credit for loving the truth and candour more than any sect or 
 party." One of them has little mental wealth, and, in a pecuniary 
 sense, he is among the poorest of the poor Free Kirk Ministers. 
 Poverty is said to be ill for Free Kirk Ministers. By a published 
 correspondence anent a school where he acted a queer part, his cha- 
 racter was damaged for stating what was untrue. One of them acted 
 so unscrupulously and sinfully that I am unable to decide whether I 
 should consider him a rogue, a dupe, or a fool. 
 
 The other, my false accuser and unjust judge, tampered wtih the 
 Cluny Deacons' Court. His authority was demanded, and as he had 
 none, he had to beat a hasty and shameful retreat. Knowing that 
 he was telling a falsehood, he said to the Presbytery that I had 
 originated Mr. Macdonald's fama. Before the Presbytery he must 
 have a fling at my young wife, so unlike his fat fat wife, with a bit 
 
29 
 
 of money, old enough to be his mother, contributing to the family 
 expenses, without increasing its members. Ministers like to rule, 
 and in the Presbytery they do much as they like, few elders being 
 members, sometimes none present. Some ministers do not want 
 them, and for nine or ten years a Session has no representative. 
 
 The inferior Court must be protected at all hazards, so the Synod 
 and the Assembly, like the Benjamites with the men of Gibeah who 
 abused the Levite's concubine, must stick up for the men in collusion 
 with a fama of a like nature. 
 
 The Assembly, in saying that it found the Presbytery had given 
 me my extracts aright, reminded me of the man, who, when told 
 that he was smored in the snow, said he *' kent it was a lie as seen's 
 he heard it," it was so evidently absurd. 
 
 It would be convenient for miscreants, could they thereby escape 
 justice, to be commanded to murder one to whom they had given a 
 cowardly, treacherous wound. 
 
 The Presbytery is bid excommunicate me in its own interest, 
 should I not denude myself of my civil rights. Should it mount the 
 ultramontane horse, and ride off on lawless license, it may be taught, 
 as priests in Germany, that it has corporal dependance, when placed 
 in an ignominious fit. A hundred and twenty thousand (" asses and 
 highlanders "), made the Assembly, Principals, and all, hear the 
 voice of God in 1873. If ministers must have a struggle for power 
 to forge lying references, and then brand and banish without a trial, 
 more thousands may see it bounden duty to shut their pockets till the 
 contest be fairly settled. Having appealed to the Head of the Church, 
 the members must also be appealed to. 
 
 Being in deadly conflict with the Presbytery, I am prepared to do 
 battle either on civil or ecclesiastical ground. I must have a trial. 
 I would not re-enter the Church but on a verdict of *' not guilty," as 
 otherwise, I would disgrace the Church as, I think, Mr. Macdonald 
 and his abettor do with the vile fama sticking to them. If bent on 
 a war of extermination, I defy the Presbytery. If willing to come 
 to reasonable terms, I will lay down my sword, but trial I must have. 
 
 I withdraw my civil case against the Presbytery, on condition that 
 it pay me the cost of its uncivilised warfare (more than £100) ; in- 
 vestigate Mr. Macdonald's fama for the sake of the Church and for 
 his own sake ; cause the Session furnish me with extracts of all its 
 
so 
 
 minutes anent me and my petition about Mr. Macdonald's fama, and 
 of the letters of Mrs. Macdonald, Barbara Ellis, Helen Brown, and 
 Alex. Bisset, in reference to the fama ; and allow me to have a trial 
 after being told the witnesses by whom it is to be attempted to prove 
 my guilt. 
 
 If the Presbytery agree to these conditions, it will, owing to my 
 experience of the Presbytery, be necessary for me to ask a guarantee 
 for their fulfilment. 
 
 I will expect to learn definitely the mind of the Presbytery at its 
 meeting on Wednesday the 15th current. 
 
 Thus off'ering to withdraw my actions against the Presbytery on 
 the only lawful and reasonable grounds, 
 
 I am, 
 Reverend Sir, 
 
 Your most obedient servant, 
 
 JOHN MUIL. 
 
 The Clerk proceeded to read the communication to the 
 Presbytery, but Mr. Mackay interposed, and said he would 
 not allow it to be read, Mr. Stothert, Lumphanan, seconded. 
 
 Mr. Muil — You'll no burke me again, I tell ye, you must 
 decide upon my letter, by the orders of the Assembly, and it 
 must be read, that's the terms you go upon. 
 
 Mr. Moir — The better thing is to remit it to a committee. 
 
 Mr. Muil — You're no to garble my letter, min'. I've been 
 burked all along, I'm nae to be burked now. 
 
 Messrs. Stothert, Moir, and Reid, were then appointed to 
 see if there was anything like an offer to ob temper the judg- 
 ment of the Assembly. 
 
 Mr. Muil — I'm to be heard by the Presbytery, and the 
 public can judge. 
 
 Mr. Reid, on behalf of the Committee, said they had ex- 
 amined the letter, and could not recommend any part of it to 
 be read except the last portion. 
 
 Mr. Muil — I must be heard now in support of my letter. 
 
31 
 
 Mr. Stothert — Let the Presbytery first decide upon the 
 procedure. 
 
 Mr. Reid — I think the best way will be to ask if Mr. Muil 
 has up to this date withdrawn his action. 
 
 Mr. Muil — That question is nothing to the purpose. My 
 letter is there, and ye have no business to ask anything at 
 me by the deliverance. 
 
 Mr. Reid — The action according to the deliverance must 
 be withdrawn, else we have to pronounce that Mr. Muil is 
 '' no longer a member of the Free Church." The action is 
 not withdrawn, and he appears before us to-day to try and 
 make conditions with us. I simply move that the Presby- 
 tery find that Mr. Muil has not withdrawn his action. 
 
 Mr. Muil (interrupting) — I must be heard now. It will 
 not do to burke me again. 
 
 Mr. Reid (continuing) — And now declare him to be no 
 longer a member of the Free Church. 
 
 Mr. Stothert — I second that motion. 
 
 Mr. Muil — That precludes me from reading thml (a written 
 speech). 
 
 The Moderator — Unless you have withdrawn the action we 
 cannot hear you. 
 
 Mr. Muil — I have withdrawn it upon conditions. 
 
 Mr. Stothert — It is not withdrawn ; it is still in court. 
 
 Mr. Muil — The action is withdrawn. It all depends upon 
 you. 
 
 Mr. Reid — Then this motion is agreed to unanimously. 
 (Applause). 
 
 Mr. Muil (tabling the requisite shilling) — I protest and 
 appeal against the decision, and I crave extracts and certified 
 copies. 
 
 The Moderator — We cannot give you that. We have the 
 
32 
 
 authority of the Assembly for now declaring you no longer a 
 member of the Free Church. 
 
 Mr. Muil — Well, I'll have an action of damage against you 
 on that point. I'll take you up before the Assembly, because 
 I have given you a letter withdrawing the action, and you 
 have not received it. 
 
 Mr. Eeid — In regard to Mr. Muil's asking for extracts, of 
 course I will send him an extract of this deliverance. 
 
 [But he did not send the extract though he promised, and 
 was paid for it]. 
 
 Mr. Muil — I must have an extract of all the proceedings, 
 my letter and all. 
 
 Mr. Reid — That's not been read. 
 
 Mr. Muil — I'll have the Court of Session upon you yet. 
 
 Mr. Mackay — I hold that Mr. Muil has no right to speak. 
 
 Mr. Muil — " Away with him ! away with him ! crucify 
 him ! cructfy him ! " The 'voice of the chief priests will pre- 
 vail, but vengeance is nae a' ower wi' them yet. Is' it minuted 
 that I protest and appeal 1 
 
 Mr. Reid — I see no harm in giving the extracts, but he is 
 not entitled to them. 
 
 [Mr. Reid afterwards wrote me that the extracts were 
 ready, and would cost 5s. In reply, I bade him submit them 
 to any person of respectability, who would tell me what they 
 contained, and if they were worth 5s., as he had no confidence 
 in me and I had none in him]. 
 
 Mr. Muil — I crave extracts and copies. I'll be back to 
 the Assembly with you, after I get the public enlightened. 
 
 An altercation here ensued between Mr. Muil and Mr. 
 Stothert. 
 
 Mr. Muil said the action was withdrawn if the Presbytery 
 liked. 
 
33 
 
 Mr. Stothert — Has it been withdrawn, or has it not ? Is 
 it in the Court ? 
 
 Mr. Muil — It is out if you agree to the conditions. My let- 
 ter withdraws the action. The action has not been before the 
 Presbytery, for the letter has not been read, so you do not 
 know what's in it. I have been burked again in spite o' 
 mysel', my letter withdraws it, and I intended to withdraw 
 it. 
 
 Mr. Reid — Well, sit down and write that out. 
 
 Mr. Muil — It all depends upon you. 
 
 Mr. Reid — You know quite well that that letter is not a 
 withdrawal. It is an insult to us and to every one of us, 
 and if that letter was published, and we thought it worth 
 while, we could prosecute you. 
 
 Mr. Muil — I would be glad of that, I would help you in it. 
 
 Mr. Reid — We don't think it worth while. 
 
 Mr. Muil — Well, I'll stand it as lang's a Free Kirk minister 
 will, and you'U get to the bottom of your pooch before I will. 
 
 The minute in reference to the matter was then adjusted, 
 and reference being made in it to the report of the Commitee. 
 
 Mr. Muil declared that he had nothing to do with the 
 Committee, but with the Presbytery. 
 
 Mr. Reid — It is the Presbytery that find there has been 
 no withdrawal. 
 
 Mr. Muil — The Committee did not tell the truth. There 
 was nothing wrong in my letter. I considered that long be- 
 fore, and it was withdrawing the case. Understand that I 
 protest and appeal, and crave extracts and copies. 
 
 The Moderator — You have no standing or right to appeal. 
 
 Mr. Stothert — Should we now engage in prayer 1 
 
 This was agreed to, Mr. Stothert leading the devotion with 
 a suitable prayer. Immediately on its conclusion (the prayer 
 
34 
 
 may have been " suitable," in the light of the pfocedure of 
 the Presbytery to put me out of the Church, and hold me 
 out till I become a hypocritical liar, as it was in the same 
 spirit. Having failed to get me evolved into a liar, they 
 prayed to God to change me. A solemn approach thus to 
 God at the throne of grace horrified me, and reminded me of 
 the man who committed murder in secret, and afterwards 
 prayed appropriately in public beside his victim), 
 
 Mr. Muil said — I would pray for the Presbytery ; and 
 forthwith he proceeded to do so, all the members of Presby- 
 tery but three leaving the room. Mr. Muil prayed for the 
 ministers, they had their imperfections, he said, and they 
 could not avoid backsliding. He prayed that they might 
 humbly be brought to see the truth, and acknowledge that 
 they had done unjustly in many ways. 
 
 On the conclusion of the prayer, the members of Presby- 
 tery who had gone outside re-entered. 
 
 Mr. Reid then said — You have done a very unwarrantable 
 thing, Mr. Muil, and we should have thrust you out by force, 
 your case was concluded, and you have committed an ad- 
 ditional sin ; and all along you have been acting in a very 
 improper way. 
 
 Mr. Muil — I have not. 
 
 Mr. Eeid — You better just leave the Presbytery. 
 
 Mr. Muil — Get a policeman and put me out. 
 
 Mr. Reid — We won't need to do that. 
 
 Mr. Muil — I gave <£! as a subscription to build this hall, 
 and the first time I come into it I am put out of the Kirk. 
 
 Mr. Reid — You are the first man that ever interrupted the 
 proceedings of the Presbytery. 
 
 Mr. Muil — I have not. 
 
 Mr. Reid — You have acted so that many had to leave ; you 
 have no right to speak. 
 
35 
 
 The above report is an extract from the Aberdeen Free 
 Press. 
 
 I do not purpose to refer farther to the early history of 
 the congregation with which I was so long connected, but I 
 must refer briefly to more recent circumstances, in which 
 I figured conspicuously, and, by the unwarrantable conduct 
 of the Church Courts, sometimes in an unfavourable light. 
 As a member of the congregation of Cluny Free Church, 
 I was interested in its welfare. There was a call for my 
 letter to the Deacons* Court about unauthorised expendi- 
 ture ; and the painting of the church which was very 
 unsuitable. My letter to the Free Press was justified by the 
 fact that the Moderator and Session had to carry out its 
 suggestions. It was my duty to petition the Session relative 
 to the notorious fama about Mr. Macdonald, as it deeply 
 affected the congregation and me as a member of it. Although 
 I had taken no step which was incompetent, nor made any 
 assertions which I could not substantiate, the Session, without 
 any tenable ground, took umbrage at me and brought me 
 before the Presbytery. I was entitled to be present at the 
 meetings of Session on the fama, but was not allowed ; and 
 also to get extracts of the minutes about Mr. Macdonald's 
 fama, and of the documents on which they had decided, when 
 I protested and appealed, but did not. 
 
 To show that my procedure was competent and constitu- 
 tional, and that the procedure of the ecclesiastical courts was 
 inconsistent, and at variance with the principles of the Free 
 Church, I will give an outline of its constitution compiled 
 from authentic and authoritative documents : — 
 
 The Free Chuch of Scotland is a voluntary association of 
 Christians, tolerated by law, and enjoying the protection of 
 law in the expression and promulgation of their religious 
 
36 
 
 opinions and doctrines, and in the performance and exercise 
 of their religious rights, and has a constitution or contract 
 to which all its members have voluntarily subjected them- 
 selves. It is not established by law, and has no proper 
 judicatory so called, constituted or recognised by the state, 
 and its members are subject only to its regulations as em- 
 bodied in the said constitution or contract, in so far only as 
 these regulations are lawful and legally put into force or 
 observed under the said constitution or contract of the said 
 church. Its members are associated and its affairs are con- 
 ducted by bodies of ministers and laymen called Kirk-Sessions, 
 Presbyteries, Synods, and General Assemblies. The deliver- 
 ances, or sentences, or other procedure of the Presbytery, 
 may be brought under review of the Synod, whose decisions 
 again are reviewable by the General Assembly. In accordance 
 with the said constitution or contract, a party in a case which 
 has been under consideration by any of the inferior courts 
 may bring their judgment under the review of the higher 
 courts by appeal. The appeal is taken at the meeting at 
 which judgment has been pronounced, and immediately on 
 its being intimated to the party. The reasons of appeal are 
 either stated at the time and entered in the minutes, or they 
 must be lodged by the appellant with the Moderator or Clerk 
 of court, and copies of these reasons with all the papers and 
 extracts are transmitted by the appellant to the clerk of the 
 higher court within a certain time from the date of appeal. 
 The appellant is entitled to all papers and copies thereof, 
 and extracts of the minutes relative to the judgment appealed 
 against in order to enable him to prosecute his appeal. The 
 extracts, papers, and copies require to be duly certified by 
 the clerk of the court pronouncing the judgment, and it is 
 ultra vires of the Presbytery or any of the inferior courts 
 
37 
 
 merely to furnish part of the said papers or extracts. The 
 Free Church constitution embodies a recognition of a national 
 Establishment of religion and the jurisdiction of the civil 
 magistrate, in preventing and remedying abuses in discipline 
 and doctrine. That the civil courts claim the right to ex- 
 pound and enforce the constitution or contract of non-Estab- 
 lished Churches, the following remarks by Lord Romilly, 
 quoted by Mr. Justice Barry in the O'Keefe Trial, will shew : — 
 The rule by which the courts are bound is this — " If any num- 
 ber of persons, either in England or in any of its dependencies, 
 associate themselves together professing to follow a particular 
 religion, not being the religion of the state, the court must, 
 when applied to, enquire into what the doctrine and discipline 
 of that religion are, and must then enforce obedience to them 
 accordingly. Thus if they be Presbyterians, or Independents, 
 or Wesleyans, or the like, the court ascertains upon proper 
 evidence what the doctrines, ordinances, and rules are by 
 which the particular sect of religionists is bound, and enforce 
 obedience to them accordingly. It is needless to cite 
 authorities to establish this proposition, the books abound 
 with decisions on the subject, all of the same character." 
 Sheriff Comrie Thomson, in giving judgment in my case, 
 said, " Non-Established Churches have no public privileges 
 higher than or different from any other body of persons 
 associated for any object, be it trivial or important, temporal 
 or spiritual. . . . No such community has any ^ Juris- 
 diction ' in the ordinary sense of the word." 
 
 If the Session considered that it had grounds of action 
 against me, I should, according to the " practice of the Free 
 Church," have been furnished with a statement of them to 
 give an opportunity of trying to vindicate myself. This was 
 not done, and the conduct of the Session was therefore un- 
 
38 
 
 constitutional. The pretended reference was not only 
 irregularly brought before the Presbytery, but it was forged 
 and the statements in it were false, and Mr. Mackay was not, 
 as it stated, Session-clerk. In any case when it came before 
 the Presbytery, I was entitled to get an extract of it, and be 
 allowed an opportunity of leading proof against it, but instead 
 of this, when 1 brought forward witnesses, not one of them 
 was examined. I was summarily put out of the church and 
 refused extracts of documents, on which the sentence of sus- 
 pension was grounded. The Presbytery had no right to break 
 a legal civil agreement to give for money, extracts which the 
 laws of the church and their own resolution bound them to 
 give to get the sentence reviewed. The avowed object of 
 the minister who moved the suspension was to please a person 
 who had once done him a favoiu-. From such a judge needed 
 one expect justice 1 
 
 Being anxious, for the credit of the church, to obtain redress 
 as an ecclesiastic, I appealed both to the Synod and to the 
 General Assembly. The la'tter acted differently on both 
 occasions from the former, but only to inflict injustice in 
 another form. 
 
 I do UDt complain alone of the injustice of the sentence, 
 but also of the courts' tyrannical bearing and procedure. 
 Were business to be transacted after the mode of these courts, 
 there could be no confidence between man and man, as it was 
 lawless and contrary to all precedent. Perhaps the Presbytery 
 had a sort of constitutional right to pass a wrong sentence, if 
 unwilling to pass a right one or unfit to do it, but had no 
 ground for refusing extracts. The sentence of suspension 
 passed without a trial was not only unprecedented and un- 
 waiTan table, but it was diabolical to put me out of the church 
 and keep me out, till I became a hypocritical liar. Having 
 
39 
 
 done this they gagged me by robbing me of extracts which 
 would have enabled me to vindicate myself. Ministers, I think, 
 in robbing and gagging me have acted more wickedly than 
 garrotters on the streets of London, inasmuch as they are better 
 instructed, are in responsible offices, and profess to be acting 
 for Christ, and guided by " His mind." It seems that its ministers 
 and courts are the church's worst enemies, as its constitution 
 has been violated by them, and the rights of its members 
 trampled on. The treatment I received shews that however 
 innocent a man may be, were he falsely accused by a forged 
 reference of lies, it would be out of his power, if opposed by a 
 factor doing a favour to a minister, to get an opportunity of 
 proving his innocence, owing to their capricious arrogance. I 
 tried every available means in virtue of my rights as a member 
 of the Free Church, and also as a civilian to obtain a trial with 
 the view of justifying myself by substantiating the statements 
 in the documents brought against me as untrue, and on which 
 I was thrust out of the church, but as it was impossible to 
 obtain a trial, it is evident that Free Churchmen as units, 
 are slaves ; while as a whole, they can be tyrants. 
 
 Being denied my rights as an ecclesiastic, I was entitled to 
 fall back upon my rights as a civilian, to obtain civil property, 
 not interfering with the spiritualprovince of the church. I 
 was defeated in the civil court. The law, as laid down by 
 the Sheriff, is not complimentary to the Free Church, neither 
 does his view of the " contract " give security to its members. 
 Having left the church, I did not prosecute my actions farther. 
 My case was so good that had I prosecuted it, I must, like 
 Bismarck, have gained, but there would have been a " heap 
 o' scirlin' for little 'oo," much cost and trouble for little use. 
 Though ordered by the Presbytery, and he agreed to do it, 
 and I paid him, Mr. Reid, the clerk has withheld an extract 
 
40 
 
 of the deliverance of the Presbytery at its meeting on 15th 
 July last, so I cannot give the text |of it. He got his head 
 twice cloured by mismanagement, perhaps this intensified his 
 natural failings. He said repeatedly in the Assembly that I 
 was not an elder, though he had just then stated that he had 
 given me a document with his signature at it, showing that 
 I was. He is perhaps none worse a Free Kirk minister for 
 saying in a Church Court what his own writing showed to be 
 untrue, though had he sworn it in a court of justice, he would, 
 I think, have peijured himself. To make him give the 
 extracts or return the money, I might prosecute him, but I 
 pity him. 
 
 An eminent authority on Free Church matters recently 
 said, " No doubt our (Free) Church is sound in theory, and 
 has clearly defined principles, but in practice v/e are manifestly 
 shifting our ground, and the growth of this evil has been 
 seen and deplored by intelHgent and independent men for a 
 number of years. . . . In 1873, it was about to land us 
 in actual rupture by the persistent proposal that we should 
 abandon our disruption principles, and amalgamate with an 
 avowedly voluntary church in opposition to the remonstrances 
 of a large number of the ministers, and the petitions and 
 memorials of 1 23,000 of the people of the church." Although 
 this majority of ministers and elders had asserted that it w^as 
 their duty to pass the mutual eligibility overtures, they were 
 prevented by the opposition of the church (" asses and High- 
 landers,") although they were undoubtedly numerically strong 
 enough to carry everything before them in the Assembly, 
 yet " the dumb ass forbade the madness of the prophet." 
 But although defeated, it is understood and even expressed 
 by themselves that they still hold the same views, and it 
 seems that the Free Church is drifting before the wind among 
 
^ 41 
 
 currents, and her officers disagree as to steering her by her 
 principles and laws, or by the opinions of majorities. 
 
 Since the disruption ministers have changed in kind, and 
 they are inferior in quality. They were then disinterested 
 and independent, holding views and acting in accordance 
 with the constitution of the Church as the true Church of 
 Scotland. Now many — most of them are voluntaries or 
 nondescripts. One of the ablest, soundest, and most distin- 
 guished ministers of the Free Church traces the voluntaryism 
 of Free Kirk ministers to the French Kevolution. He at- 
 tacks them as holding infidelity in one of its most dangerous 
 forms, as denying " the duty of Nations in their corporate 
 capacity, to honour and serve the God of Nations, and to 
 promote the interests of the Church of Christ." Few Fre 3 
 Kirk ministers are men of ability, most of them have turned 
 their backs on the principles they subscribed, many of them 
 are very poor and cannot, it is said, be good at the money, 
 and they are, as noticed in the Aberdeen Free Press under 
 the influence of individuals on whom, in a sense, they are 
 dependent. 
 
 The procedure to which I have succumbed shows that 
 members of the Free Church are as much slaves as the 
 people of England in the time of King John, and liave as 
 much need of a Magna Charta. They need it to dllji^ive 
 ministers of power to put them out of the Church without a 
 trial at the instance of any one. In the case between the 
 nose and the eyes it was decided that the eyes should be 
 shut when the nose put his spectacles on. When minis- 
 ters lynch law and burke it is time for members to shut 
 their pockets — as prayer and fasting would drive the devil 
 thus tempting to such wickedness, out of them,- Matthew xi. 
 21. Ministers pat and praise members forgiving so liberally 
 
42 
 
 to the funds of the Church, and in the same breath tell them 
 they are giving too little by a half to get ministers of 
 use. At one time they boast that the financial success of 
 the Free Church is proof that religion can be efficiently sup- 
 ported on the voluntary principle — anon they complain that 
 ministers can not be good so cheap, like the man who could 
 not spell aright with a bad pen. Ministers of the Free 
 Church bewray themselves by their speech, which is inconsis- 
 tent and contradictory. They are all of one mind and uni- 
 form in action as to getting as much money from the mem- 
 bers as possible. They never get enough though they util- 
 ised the defeat on the union question, and the revival move- 
 ment for the purpose. In return ministers claim, as in 
 my case, a right to "spiritual independence" — act as they like, 
 burke at will ; forge references of lies ; wink at scandalous 
 " friends," write what is untrue in Free Church records ; and 
 break legal agreements. And when utterly baffled in evolving 
 a man into a liar, to set one of the richest " brethern" to 
 pray in a " suitable prayer" that God would change him. 
 
 One of the Free Kirk ministers seeking the downfall of 
 the Church of Scotland has been up the country and down 
 it ; in the highlands and in the islands. He must be a model 
 man, and I took some pains to get his measure. As a Free 
 Church minister he is of course poor as a church rat. One 
 of his members says he otherwise resembles that animal, 
 as, when caught in a trick, he will cut a hole to escape. 
 There is a screw loose in his conscience when he can disown 
 the creed he vowed to keep ; and when he can sei^ve three mas- 
 ters, mismanaging home duties, and set out on an expedition to 
 abuse " his betters." It is said his congregation feel that his 
 usefulness to them is at an end, but they have no hope of gett- 
 ing rid of him. Such a man could hardly be gentlemanly. He 
 
43 
 
 has little taste and less dignity, while his bodily presence is 
 weak, and hmwalk, if not his speech, contemptible. If Paine's 
 death was a good illustration of his principles, this man's 
 home is a good illustration of the work of Free Church 
 ministers who compass sea and land to make proselytes to 
 disestablishment. A lawyer, an inveterate foe to the Church 
 of Scotland, of long standing, attacked it in a proud speech, 
 noticeable for the frequent recurrence of the word *^ humble," 
 " humble." If as selfish in his views against the Church as 
 against me, he should use the word " greedy," " greedy " for 
 " humble." It is well to kill twa dogs wi' a' bane " and while 
 " humbly " crying " down with the church," he may bring 
 " grist to his mill " like the Cluny case, and it will re- 
 quire looking after, if he gain, to make him just in his 
 charges. 
 
 The manner in which the members of the Cluny Free 
 Church repeatedly broke up that congregation and stopped all 
 collections, shews what the whole members of the church have 
 it in their power to do, and what they may or even should do. 
 We have an illustration in Mr. Mitchell's case, how a con- 
 gregation under an influential and unprincipled leader, can 
 tyrannise over a blameless minister. This shews that there 
 is no security for ministers ; while my case shews that there 
 is no security for members of the Free Church. Ministers 
 complain that they are inadequately paid to work aright, yet 
 they have no legal or other powers to compel the members 
 to give them sufficient remuneration, and the ministry, it is 
 said, is suffering to the injury of the members, in consequence; 
 so that the state of matters in this respect is aptly character- 
 ized by Cowper when he says — 
 
u 
 
 " In sooth the sorrow of such times, 
 Is not to be expressed, 
 When they who give and they who get, 
 Are both alike distressed." 
 
 An eminent Free Church minister says, "Our ministers 
 are not of sufficient quality," nor " are we supporting them 
 adequately." Numbers of them have resiled from the stand- 
 ards of the church, and have been fraternising with the 
 voluntaries, and now although unfit for the efficient discharge 
 of their own duties, many of them are going out of the way, 
 and vehemently agitating for disestablishment. 
 
 Principals and ministers of the Free Church claim " Scrip- 
 tural authority " for " Spiritual independence," not only not 
 to observe the sanctioned laws and practice of the church, 
 but also practically when they can muster a majority to act 
 as if they were the church, and free from all control of the 
 moral law as well as of the creed, and the principles they had 
 subscribed. Unionists evolved into disestablishmentists, 
 shout as if they were the representatives of disruption prin- 
 ciples, and even the temple of God. They are neither. They 
 have lost their pedigi-ee. They are in my case, the repre- 
 sentatives of the Benjamites, sticking up for the men of 
 Gibeah. 
 
 Mr. Gardiner, Old Aberdeen, says, " The peculiar principles 
 of the Free Church would not be received by the world, and 
 more than ever they must be convinced of the difficulties of 
 their theory of Spiritual independence being fully realised on 
 this earth and accepted." 
 
 We have a practical view of this " Spiritual independence " 
 of the Free Church in the Cluny case. This will enable the 
 world to see and realise the " theory " whether or not it may 
 incline to embrace it. 
 
45 
 
 As the prophet in derision said of Baal, " he is a God," so 
 say I. of the " Spiritual independence " manifested in this 
 case. It is the " mind of Christ.", Jesus Christ is the same 
 yesterday; to-day, and for ever, but ministers in Free Church 
 courts (almost no elders there), are of different minds, often 
 bitterly opposed to each other, and very immannerly. Is 
 Christ divided, and is it His mind that the brethren " strive 
 and fight about abusing their neighbours while envying and 
 grieving at their good ? A factor with a fama is brought 
 competently before church courts, two " hielan " ministers 
 (with notable wives like his own, all the ministers' wives 
 are against me), stick up for him, and will not investigate 
 the fama to do him justice, but fight for him and bungle 
 matters so as to make even people, who were not so before, 
 suspicious of him and of them. The two " hielan' " ministers 
 say what is untrue the one after the other in the Session and 
 the Presbytery, and with a little aid, burke the man who had 
 been anxious for justice to the factor. Such men would be 
 among the greatest sticklers for " Spiritual independence," 
 to give them a chance in their zeal and charity to evolve a 
 man into a liar, to make him worthy of a place in a church 
 so unshackled and free. 2/13 (according to D. Mitchell, 
 lawyer), had the " mind of Christ " to put him out of the 
 church, to teach him " genuine " repentance for doing his 
 duty. The rest of the Presbytery had the " mind of Christ " 
 to disapprove of the 2/13 doings. But as he w^ould not attend 
 the confessional with Mr Reid, he must be burked or tethered, 
 kept from the Assembly by sleight or might. It was there- 
 fore the " mind of Christ " that the Presbytery should rob 
 him of extracts, and deny the robbery as rogues would do. 
 
 On applying to the Synod, it declined even to look at 
 papers to know his case, and dismissing his petition, refused 
 
46 
 
 to minute his appeal. It was the " mind of Christ " that it 
 should trick openly. 
 
 The Assembly, as the " mind of Christ," ordered the Pres- 
 bytery to do one part of its duty, give extracts of documents 
 in the suspension, but refused to order an extract of petition 
 complaining of Mr. Mackay, the " friend." of the factor with 
 a fama to get him tried by his brethren. When the order of 
 the Assembly had reached the Presbytery, it was the " mind 
 of Christ " (?) that they should " keep back part of the price," 
 and aflBrm that they had given it all. On applying to the 
 " minister of God," in a civil matter, the whole 'priesthood of 
 the kirk were as indignant at him as at the abolition of 
 Patronage in the Church of Scotland. It was said ministers 
 would not only have put him out of the church, but even 
 into the lowest dungeons of the inquisition, as well as knock 
 down the establishment. Though they have " Spiritual in- 
 dependence," they evidently lack absolute power, so I am, to 
 use the first person, yet at large, and the Church of Scotland 
 still stands. 
 
 Principal Lumsden, wily man, by his ruse^ saved the Synod 
 from dealing with the petition for redress, and the Presbytery 
 escaped as a bird, w^hile I was caught in the Principal's trap. 
 He could not keep me, it was the " mind of Christ " that I 
 should get another chance to be fused into a modem Free 
 Churchman, a cameleon. 
 
 Dr. Rainy, aping the Pope, affirmed in his motion that the 
 Presbytery had done what it had not, given me extracts 
 aright ; that it had acted constitutionally in burking me so 
 far ; and that I should be burked outright if I did not repent 
 and amend. To this motion the Assembly wickedly gave its 
 sanction, so it was the act of the whole church. It has begun 
 to dawn upon my mind that I should explain matters to next 
 
47 
 
 Assembly, to give it an opportunity of vindicating the church, 
 should I succeed in diffusing a knowledge of facts previously 
 among the members. 
 
 I do not feel for my own position. I have the approbation 
 of conscience, and I trust the approval of God for taking the 
 steps I took. I felt there was necessity laid upon me. I do 
 feel for the church, under the guidance of its present rulers. 
 Once the admiration of all lands, the church is now contem- 
 ptably contending for licence to burke, to lie, forge, and 
 cheat, scouting at all enquiry, and setting at defiance the 
 rights of members, and treating them as if they were not 
 British subjects, besides being Christians in a Christian land. 
 
 It is said there is but a step from the sublime to the 
 ridiculous ; here is such a stride that it takes in the absurd. 
 Like Napoleon in Egypt killing his wounded faithful soldiers, 
 Dr. Rainy and his silly followers have made a " blunder " 
 whether or not like him they may be taught to see their folly, 
 not to speak of their sin. The constitution of the Free 
 Church recognises a national establishment of religion — as 
 the following remarks by Dr. Chalmers will show : — 
 Speaking from the Chair of the Free Assembly, he said : — 
 " We quit a vitiated establishment but would rejoice in re- 
 turning to a pure one, we are the advocates for a national 
 religion and national support of religion, and we are not vo- 
 luntaries." Instead of attempting to pull down the Esta- 
 blished Church ministers should, to be consistent, endeavour 
 to get removed, if they think they have sufficient influence 
 with the legislature, what they believe in her to be still in- 
 consistent with the Scriptural Establishment of Religion. 
 The legislature, by the abolition of Patronage, which it un- 
 justly imposed, has now placed the Established Church in 
 such a position that the leaders of the Free Church, at the 
 
48 
 
 time of the Disruption, would have been conscientiously able 
 to remain in it. As it was the civil element, Patronage, that 
 led to the interference of the Court of Session with the Esta- 
 blsshed Church, now that it has been removed, its spiritual 
 independence is absolute ; and as its laws are defined and re- 
 cognised by the statute laws of the land, there is security 
 both for the ministers and members, which the ministers and 
 members of the Free Church have not, but they have patron- 
 age by cliques. Ministers, and office-bearers of the Free 
 Church by attacking the establishment, are evidently acting 
 the part of Demetrius, " and the craftsmen of like occupa- 
 tion," and for the same reason ; and a Principal of the Free 
 Church, Dr. Rainy doing so recently, said a " friendly gentle- 
 man " (sorry for him), would say to him, " well, my dear 
 fellow, you must see that you have been making a fool of 
 yourself" 
 
 In 1841, Dr. Chalmers said, " Were I a Conservative Prime 
 Minister, and I use the term not in its party but in its good 
 and general meaning, as expressive of that policy which were 
 the best conservators of public order and of all our institutions. 
 I should deem it a masterstroke of sound and able statesman- 
 ship to give the people of Scotland the election of their 
 ministers, believing as I do, that whatever may be the sem- 
 blance there is not one common point of practical or substantial 
 analogy between a Democracy in the church, and a Democracy 
 iu the commonwealth, when guarded as our church is by her 
 orthodox standards, and administered by her soundly educated 
 clergy." 
 
 Attacking the Establishment in the position in which it is 
 now placed. Free Church ministers are fighting in opposition 
 to the views held by Dr. Chalmers, Dr. Welsh, Dr. Cunning- 
 ham, and other leaders of the Free Church at the Divsruption, 
 
4d 
 
 but their doing so is only in accordance with their uncon- 
 stitutional conduct to me, and in connection with the Union 
 movement and the Mutual Eligibility Scheme, in which they 
 were reproved and coerced by the body of the members, who 
 voluntarily contribute what forms the "backbone" of the Free 
 Church ; and the withdrawal of which would leave the 
 ministers utterly powerless and prostrate. By their pro- 
 cedure with the voluntaries on the one hand, and with me 
 on the other, principals and ministers of the Free Church set 
 at defiance the moral as well as the ecclesiastical law ; but 
 there is one law, " Dunse Law," which they must observe, as 
 on the observance of it hangs their poor insecure pittance of 
 daily bread, of which they speak so much. And a hint, even 
 by 123,000 (" asses and Highlanders,") that they were break- 
 ing this law, would at once bring them to their senses as 
 before, and instantly force them to repent, confess, and recant, 
 as at the General Assembly of 1873, when their conduct was 
 not only sublimely ridiculous, but also morally scandalous, 
 as they pretended to rejoice at what they said was the Lord's 
 doing, and yet begged to be allowed ex gratia to record their 
 grief at the result of it. Consistently inconsistent Free Kirk 
 ministers divest themselves of all claim to respect, when, 
 after having declared Patronage to be an intolerable evil, 
 they madly run out of their way to bellow so loudly at its 
 removal. 
 
APPENDIX. 
 
 The following are extracts of the documents " produced and 
 read " by Eev. Donald Mackay, in stating the pretented 
 reference from the Session of Cluny ; and founded on by the 
 Free Presbytery of Kincardine O'Neil, in their sentence of 
 suspension on 7th May, 1872 ; and also of my reasons of 
 protest and appeal to the General Assembly against that 
 sentence. 
 
 The following is the letter refused by the Presbytery for 
 which the civil action was raised. 
 
 No. 0. 
 
 Nether Sauchen, 
 
 30th December, 1871. 
 
 Dear Sir, 
 
 I enclose £1 to assist to pay the debt incurred by the 
 alterations on the church : changing the position of the pulpit, and 
 putting in a stove, which will be both beneficial to minister and 
 people. Both these works were mentioned in the intimation from 
 the pulpit, calling a congregational meeting. They were sanctioned 
 by the meeting after the amount of work to be done had been shewn 
 and the probable cost stated. Those who have carried out these 
 works were therefore competently authorised to do so, and to ask 
 subscriptions to pay them. 
 
 It appears that £10 or £12 of debt, double that authorised, have 
 been incurred for works not authorised by the meeting, or even 
 mentioned in the intimation of it from the pulpit. I do not know if 
 it would be fair to the congregation to call a meeting for a certain 
 work or purpose requiring a certain amount of money, if when the 
 meeting authorised that, the court should take it upon them unauthor- 
 ised and unknown to the congregation, to incur a double debt and 
 appropriate subscriptions promised to pay the sanctioned works, to 
 
51 
 
 relieve themselves of the debt they had contracted on their own 
 authority. 
 
 The extra expenditure on the pulpit is right enough in itself. It 
 would be creditable to those who expended it, if having done it on 
 their own authority, they would pay it out of their own pockets, in 
 addition to the subscriptions they had propiised to the necessary 
 work competently authorised. A grand pulpit gotten in a mean way 
 would not be desirable, but if honourably gotten it would be an out- 
 set to the church and a pleasure to the congregation, poor and hardly 
 pushed as it is. 
 
 The sort of painting of the church seems to me to be wrong in every 
 sense. It reminds one of cheap shows at feeing markets and of 
 ritualistic tendencies in the High Church. Besides awakening 
 associations hurtful to the solemnity of a Free Church congregation 
 on Sabbath, it is objectionable as darkening the church. I hear that 
 Mr. Macdonald is to pay it in addition to the subscription he pro- 
 mised to the regular work. 
 
 If after seeing the effect of the painting on Sabbath, it should be 
 resolved to whitewash the church, I would be willing to assist. I 
 think it would be desirable now that we have begun on the church 
 to finish by procuring mats for the passages, I have been long anxious 
 for them, and you can appropriate the other £1 enclosed to aid that 
 purpose, if you approve and see that it can be done with propriety. 
 If you do not approve or do not see that it can be done, please give 
 the £1 as a donation to the congregational collection for the Sustenta- 
 tion Fund, and 
 
 I am. 
 
 Dear Sir, 
 
 Yours truly, 
 
 (Signed) John Muil. 
 
 Mr. John Edwards, Elder. 
 
 No. 1. 
 
 Nether Sauchen, 
 
 4th Janif^ary, 1872. 
 Dear Sir, 
 
 I have just seen Mr. James Milne, Kebbaty, relating to the 
 painting on the wall behind the pulpit. 
 
5^ 
 
 I beg to say that if it be made similar, or nearly so, to the rest of 
 the walls, I would not find fault with it or shew further dissatisfaction. 
 I beg further to say, I think if those who laid out the extra ex- 
 penditure on the pulpit do not pay it out of their own pockets in 
 addition to the subscriptions they had promised to the works 
 sanctioned by the congregational meeting, that the pulpit will not be 
 creditable to them, nor an honour to the congregation. 
 I am, 
 
 Dear Sir, 
 
 Yours truly, 
 
 (Signed) John Mull. 
 Mr. John Edwards, Elder. 
 
 No. 2. 
 
 Nether Sauchen, 
 
 15tJi Junuary, 1812. 
 
 It was stated in your Friday's issue that **a deputation of office- 
 bearers from Oluny appeared to request the Presbytery to take steps 
 for enabling them to give a call to the Probationer presently labouring 
 amongst them. The Presbytery resolved to do all in their power for 
 carrying out the wishes of the congregation." 
 
 An explanation is needed to show the status which the members 
 of the deputation hold in the congregation, and the capacity in which 
 they appeared at the Presbytery. About two years ago there was 
 unanimity in the congregation, but about that time, an elder was 
 bent on obtruding a case on the Session. The minister and two 
 elders thought they should take no cognizance of it. The other three 
 elders strongly held an opposite view. The case was carried to the 
 Presbytery, when it was decided in accordance with the minister's 
 view of it. 
 
 The three elders and the two deacons then resigned, and along 
 with their relatives and dependants left the congregation. Thus at 
 once the congregation was in a measure broken up. Though blame- 
 less, the amiable and devoted minister was deeply grieved, but 
 though so severely tried by these men aftd by the 'proc^dinrjs of Pres- 
 hyieryy his conduct was circumspect and conciliatory. He e.vinced 
 
53 
 
 Christian fortitude and pious resignation, and continued as before to 
 take the greatest pains on the preparation of his sermons. Those 
 opposed to him acknowledging that his sermons when he left Oluny 
 were as fresh as the sermons he preached when he came to it. 
 
 The elder who was bent on obtruding the case on the Session has 
 not come back yet. The other two elders and the two deacons came 
 back when the minister demitted his charge. 
 
 The Moderator advised them to re-assume office without re-election 
 or induction. The two elders and one deacon have done so in defiance 
 of the " Practice of the Free Church." On seeing the notice in your 
 paper, I made enquiry and learned that two of the men* who had 
 re-assumed office had taken it upon them to appear at the Presbjrfcery 
 without being appointed by a congregational meeting. The con- 
 gregation was not only ignorant of what they were doing at the 
 Presbytery, but did not even know that they were at it. Neither 
 had there been any authentic expression of the wishes of the con- 
 gregation regarding the mission of the deputation. 
 
 It was suggested to the Presbytery at their meeting on the 19th 
 inst. , that they should discontinue the present Moderator of Session 
 and appoint another in his stead to be a safe guide. 
 
 The Moderator having neglected to call a meeting of the members 
 of the congregation to afford them a constitutional opportunity, 
 legitimately to express their minds and wishes relative to giving a 
 call to the Probationer labouring acceptably amongst them, and to 
 appoint a deputation of their number to represent them at the Pres- 
 bytery, he had no reliable data on which he could as it is usual for 
 the interim Moderator of Session (to do), to make report to the 
 Presbytery respecting the condition of the congregation, the amount 
 of their agreement as to the choice of a pastor, and their ripeness for 
 "calling one." 
 
 As the Moderator neglected to have a meeting, there could besides 
 be no appointment to the Presbytery by the congregation, consequently 
 the Moderator and the deputation were not in a position at the Pres- 
 bytery, either honourable to themselves or beneficial and creditable 
 to the congregation. 
 
 Such is the disposition of the other office-bearers, and the members, 
 as well as the state of the congregation, that could the Moderator 
 * R. Macdonald and A. Williamson. 
 
54 
 
 and the three men who have been in office, and out of office, and into 
 office again, yet act with propriety and conduct the business, or allow 
 the other office-bearers to conduct it in accordance with the laws of 
 the church, consistently with the due exercise of the rights of the 
 members of the congregation, there is a fair prospect that the con- 
 gregation would be prosperous and also that the Free Church would 
 be extended, and the interests of true religion promoted in the 
 district. 
 
 (Signed) One Interested. 
 
 P.S. — I called at the office of the Free Press, to ask why this letter 
 (transmitted to the Free Press on the 15th inst., by one of its agents), 
 had not appeared in that paper. The Editors were out, and the 
 clerk did not know, neither did he know if a man from Cluny had 
 called on Wednesday at the office, in reference to suppression of the 
 letter. 
 
 (Intd.) J. M. 
 
 No. 3. 
 
 Nether Sauchen,- 
 
 27th Jan. 1872. 
 
 Sir, 
 
 I hear you are speaking reproachfully of me. Be it so. I 
 would not like to be of your stamp to get your praise. 
 
 However much you may think it your duty to despise me, I may 
 be allowed to say that I hope, now that you have entered on another 
 farming enterprise, that you will act more honourably than you did 
 in the Tombeg business. 
 
 Being such a business man now, any true reports of the impropriety 
 of conduct in the "Dominie," would be a disgrace to the congregation 
 of the Free Church, Cluny, in which he is such a great man. 
 
 I may mention that one of the three men who have re -assumed 
 office, a decent man, whom I like and respect, one of whom there 
 have been no reports, true or false, of disgraceful, indecent conduct 
 with servant girls, no hint that he had filled his office houses with 
 straw at a convenient time, and then set them on fire ; nor any 
 suspicion that he had had a bastard before he took office at all. I say 
 
55 
 
 such a decent man lately told me that if it had not been for (spite at 
 Mr. ) Downie and Mrs. Mitchell, Mr. Mitchell might have been minis- 
 ter at Cluny yet. Trusting you will give a due share of your atten- 
 tion to these things as well as to abusing me, 
 I am, yours, &c., 
 
 (Signed) John Muil. 
 P.S. — 29th Jan., 1872. — The deputation of office-bearers were 
 ignored in the intimation of the meeting for Wednesday. Great 
 men ! I think they made a great mistake. 
 
 (Intd.) J. M. 
 Mr. Fyffe, Free Church Schoolmaster, Cluny. 
 
 No. 4. 
 
 To THE President of the Late Congregational Meeting, Free 
 Church, Cluny. 
 
 You would not read the intimation calling the meeting, neither 
 did you what know what it had been called for. You were angry at 
 my letter on congregational matters, but the meeting proved that its 
 statements were true and relevant. You were set on holding me up 
 to the contempt of the congregation, and encouraging others to do it. 
 But you did not allow me due liberty of speech in self defence, and 
 said I had no right to speak, I was " at the bar." You should have 
 been impartial, and you should know that there is not such a place 
 as the bar of a congregational meeting. As you denied that Mon- 
 creiff s Practice of the Free Church was sanctioned, you could not 
 be a safe guide as an interim moderator. 
 
 One of the " Hungtae " office-bearers* made a speech telling how 
 much he had done for the congregation, and how well he had done 
 it. He said he regretted so much the state of our finances, but that 
 he would not say how much he had contributed to them. The 
 " Hungtae" office-bearers are not guilty of giving too much money 
 to the finances, nor too much time to the prayer meetings. The 
 Sabbath morning prayer meeting may cease to be for them. Would 
 he and the " other great guns" (as you say), "cease firing" at me, 
 
 R. Macdonald. 
 
56 
 
 nd be duly aimed and adequately worked, they would " in no time " 
 blow to atoms or out of existence altogether every cause of regret 
 about the finances, and at once ease his mind. He is a great man, 
 and although some have cast off allegiance to him, woe be to the 
 official or day-labourer on Cluny that offends ! Even the late 
 minister and the late probationer felt the power of his influence when 
 adverse to them. He made me feel it too. As a sample of how much 
 he has to do, and how well he does it, he came here about 9 p.m., 
 on one of the rainiest nights of this rainy season, and threatened me 
 with prosecution for telling truths I had a right and a call to tell. 
 He asked me where '* I got my information," I told him it was *' none 
 of his business.'* " If you think you have grounds, it is your duty 
 to raise an action against me." He said I wanted to ruin the con- 
 gregation. I told him it was a lie, and took his followers' witnesses, 
 adding, **I have enough of you," and left him. Some of the most 
 intelligent members of the congregation have left, and others speak 
 of leaving on his account. 
 
 It is known to some of the office-bearers that for months past there 
 has been a fama in relation to the seventh commandment about one 
 of the members. Surely it is your duty and the elders' duty to in- 
 vestigate the matter for your own sakes, as well as for his and the 
 congregation's sake. A conmiittee man* read a paper attacking me 
 anent the letter that displeased you and some others. I exposed 
 some of its fallacies at the time, and asked him, as it was an attack 
 on a public letter, to place it in my hands that I might be in a position 
 to reply to it on equal grounds. He vsdthholds it. He has appeared 
 as a culprit at the bar of a church court, and I am sure he would be 
 condemned at the bar of public opinion, if he would give the public 
 an opportunity of comparing his paper ■v\dth the letter that so excited 
 his indignation as to force him to read it. Perhaps he is dishonourable 
 enough to do a thing below board that he would shrink from doing 
 openly above it. 
 
 The teachert accused me of having said to him that I would give 
 a yearly sum additional to get the late minister away. His intention 
 seemed to be to damage my position. What I said to him was that 
 I would give the additional sum of money as a contribution to his 
 
 support when away, it being evident to me at the time that he would 
 
 * F. Christie, mason. f J. J. Fyfe— "Fyffie." 
 
57 
 
 leave. It was only one who acted as he had done about Tombeg, 
 who could make such a statement. He distinguished himself by the 
 Tombeg farming speculation, shewing that he had a superabundance 
 of hrasSy but a sad lack of gold as well as of Christian principle and 
 gentlemanly propriety of conduct. Though he had " nae gain gear 
 but ae ewe and ae lamb," he took Tombeg, and bought several articles 
 upon it, but he could not enter it, nor pay one of the articles he had 
 bought. 
 
 Ye *'canna tak' breeks aff o' a Hielanman," so he got off with a 
 *'hale skin," on the belief that he was too lean or too poor to be 
 worth powder and shot, too insignificant to be prosecuted. 
 
 A Free Church teacher should be a man of spotless character, and 
 eminent for prudence, piety, and consistency, solely devoting his 
 time on school hours to do justice impartially to every scholar, and 
 he should, I think, be a regular Sabbath school teacher, being thus 
 qualified and thus deserving of confidence. 
 
 He was elected a member of committee, and thought he was in- 
 vested with such powers that he did what was unlawful and ridiculous. 
 
 He proposed a vote of confidence in the office-bearers. The " Hung- 
 tae anes " are unworthy of it. Having by writing under their hands 
 resigned their offices, they, along with their relatives and dependants 
 deserted the congregation. Coming back, they re-assumed office, 
 contrary to the laws of the church. 
 
 In their assumed capacity they have done things unwarrantably. 
 They, along with the teacher and one or two others,* in a meeting 
 of the Deacons' Court, usurped the right of the congregation, and 
 dismissed the late Probationer, leaving the pulpit for months with 
 no stated supply, one Sabbath empty. Having mutinied and seized 
 the helm of affairs, the congregation was wrecked, and the late 
 minister and the late probationer both thrown overboard. 
 
 Surely, men whose conduct has made them a laughing-stock in the 
 district, and who have brought discredit on the congregation, and 
 reproach on the Free Church, deserve something very different from 
 that of being included in a vote of confidence in the office-bearers. 
 
 (Signed) John Muil. 
 
 ■* Mr. Macdonald's " doon-looking henchman " underling-, W. Gilchrist. 
 
58 
 
 No. 5. 
 
 Nether Sauchen, 
 
 21st March, 1872. 
 
 Sir, 
 
 I understood when I got your letter of the 11th inst., that Mr. 
 Macdonald's case was closed, as related to the Session here, as it had 
 come to be " unanimously satisfied " that he was innocent. I cannot 
 see what was the difference of its finding on the 19th inst., unless it 
 be in the number of times you have sat on the case (being four), and 
 that there has been some further attempt at investigation. 
 
 I protested and appealed on the 19th inst. , and craved extracts for 
 the following reasons : — 1. That the Moderator and you have both 
 insulted me since I lodged the petition, in a way that convinces me 
 that you are not inclined to do justice in relation to me in Sessional 
 matters, or that you are incapable of doing it, inasmuch as you told 
 me (when asking a competent question), that I was *' below your 
 notice ; " and he ordered me "out at the door," when I stated that I 
 declined to answer a question about your children, which had not 
 been regularly brought before me. 2. That the finding or decision 
 of the Session is inconsistent with statements currently reported. 
 3. That it does not appear that the Session have taken evidence on 
 oath in relation to the/am«, or that every competent witness has even 
 been precognosced. 4. That considering these things there is room 
 for suspicion that there has been partial dealing. 5. That the way 
 in which the Session has gone about the fama, confirms some people 
 in the belief that they had not all a desire or ability to deal thoroughly 
 with the matter so as to carry the public along with them as to their 
 decision. — I am, &c.. 
 
 Mr. Andrew Williamson, Elder. 
 
 (Signed) John Muil. 
 
 No. 6. 
 Sir, 
 
 Nether Sauchen, 
 
 21st March, 1872. 
 
 In relation to the question that the Moderator asked about 
 you having children before you were married, I declined to answer 
 
59 
 
 it on the ground that no charge had been regularly brought against 
 me in writing, and put into my hand. No man is obliged to criminate 
 himself. I have been informed as to who can give some information 
 on the point on which you are so sensitive. The person is one who 
 knew you and all about you at Kinaldie. 
 
 Of course I heard all the reports about your profitable fire, for 
 which you were so well prepared at so convenient a season of the 
 year. 
 
 I heard some particulars also about a girl you had at the Guise, 
 who was not " below your notice," and also about the certificate you 
 gave her in writing, and how the truth of it was proved. I did not 
 hear reports of these in a way that was, I thought, calculated to raise 
 you any higher in my estimation. I state these things, as the 
 Moderator wished to know what I had said or heard about you. 
 
 I protested at the Session on the 19th inst. , against being asked 
 questions in such a way, and also protested against being cited to the 
 Presbytery without knowing what I was charged with. Of course I 
 could not be prepared with evidence. — I am, &c., 
 
 (Signed) John Muil. 
 
 Mr. Andrew Williamson, Elder, Free Church, Cluny. 
 
 No. 7. 
 This note was sent to Mr. Williamson along with the pre- 
 ceding letter : — ■ 
 
 You did a queer way with the Sacramental Cup on Sabbath, so 
 different from others, handing it round to the end of our seat instead 
 of handing it to my wife as you should have done, to follow the course 
 of the bread. If you try a trick to keep the extracts from me, I 
 have adequate support to bring the whole matter by petition before 
 the Presbytery. 
 
 No. 8. 
 Extract minute of Free Presbytery of Kincardine O'Neil. 
 Vestry of the Free Church, Cluny, 23rd July, 1856 ; which 
 day the Free Presbytery of Kincardine O'Neil 
 met and was constituted. 
 
60 
 
 Inter alia. 
 The Presbytery also agree to recommend Mr. John Muil, Elder, 
 between whom and the minister the differences chiefly arose, to with • 
 draw in the meantime from the Session and congregation of the Free 
 Church, Cluny, and to connect himself with some other congregation 
 of the Free Church in the neighbourhood ; it being understood that 
 he retains his status as an elder of the Free Church, that it is com- 
 petent for him to hold and exercise the elder's office in any other 
 congregation of this church, on being duly called thereto, or even in 
 the congregation of Oluny, when these unhappy difTerences have 
 altogether disai)peared, and that he is entitled to receive a certificate 
 of church membership from the Session of Cluny when he shall call 
 for it. 
 
 No. 9. 
 Reasons for protest and appeal to the General Assembly 
 by Mr. John Muil, against a judgment of the Free Presby- 
 tery of Kincardine O'Neil, suspending him from church 
 membership, sine die. 
 
 I protest and appeal to the General Assembly against the decision 
 of the Presbytery at Torphins, on the 7th May, 1872, to excommuni- 
 cate me for the reasons, 1. That to do so in the circumstances was 
 oppressive and unwarrantable inasmuch as it appeared to me that 
 I had done nothing wrong, and therefore demanded a libel stating 
 definitely the charges against me, and who made them. 2. That I 
 am excommunicated for telling the truth, and for nothing else, and 
 by the minute of Presbytery can be re-admitted only by telling lies, 
 put out as an honest man, would be taken back as a liar. 3. That 
 the Presbytery took no evidence, and would not allow any, though 
 induced by the Moderator and Clerk to cite witnesses to prove the 
 statements in my letters brought against me as untrue ; and to prove 
 the falsehood of the charges brought against me, the Presbytery 
 withheld a copy of the charges brought against me, and would not 
 examine one of the nme gentlemen who had come forward to state 
 the truth in the whole matter. I had demanded a copy of the charges 
 when read to the Presbytery, and also from the clerk at his own 
 
61 
 
 house, in vain. The Presbytery thus acting in a way unjust to me, 
 and galling and disgusting to these gentlemen. 4. That if a Kirk 
 Session composed of men, some of them assuming office without 
 re-election or induction, after having to the knowledge of the Pres- 
 bytery resigned by writing and formally, can bring a professed re- 
 ference before the Presbytery though untrue and partly forged, and 
 get one who had told the truth about them, excommunicated instanter 
 without evidence of guilt, there would be no security to members of 
 the church against summary excommunication. 5. That the Presby- 
 tery allowed Mr. Mackay, in stating his professed reference, to say 
 things which appeared to me so out of his way and so unwarrantable 
 that I felt called upon to state to the Presbytery that it would not 
 surprise me though he should say that the sun had not risen, and 
 that I had prevented it. 6. That the Clerk of Presbytery having 
 unjustly withheld the ' documents from me, as founded on by the 
 Presbytery in excommunicating me, I cannot reply fully or give 
 reasons to meet every charge the Presbytery may have considered in 
 their decision against me. 7. That the proceedings of the Presby- 
 tery were rash, reckless, and of the nature of lynch -law, in a matter 
 of supreme importance to me. They did not so much as engage in 
 prayer, nor give me time for deliberation. 
 
 (Signed) John Muil. 
 
 P.S. — I could not reply sooner, as I only got some of the extracts 
 yesterday, and have not got all the papers yet. 
 
 (Intd.) J. M. 
 
 I protested and appealed against the decision of the Presbytery (1) 
 in not expressing disapprobation of Mr. Mackay and Mr. Williamson's 
 conduct as set forth in the petition, for the reason that it was unwor- 
 thy of one individual to act to another in the way besides of a minis- 
 ter and a professed elder (?) I protested and appealed against the 
 decision of the Presbytery in reference to the removing of Mr. William- 
 son from office, for the reason, that he had resigned, and acted in a 
 way to break up the congregation, and then resumed office without 
 being lawfully called to it. 
 
 I protested and appealed against the decision of the Presbytery in 
 not removing from office Mr. Edward, elder, and Mr. P. Macdonald, 
 deacon, because they held office unlawfully, and because the Presby- 
 tery declined to investigate the fama about Mr. Macdonald, as it 
 
62 
 
 should be, for his owai sake, for the congregation's sake, and for the 
 church's sake. 
 
 (Signed) John Muil. 
 
 No. 10. 
 The following is a copy of Mr. Mackay's pretended reference, ** That 
 Mr. John Muil has of late circulated caluminous and injurious charges 
 respecting your petitioner in a letter or letters written to his neigh- 
 bours ; also, that he has of late drawn up, printed, and circulated 
 letters in Cluny, signed by him, in which he brings unfounded and 
 caluminous charges against the office-bearers, the teacher of the Con- 
 gregational School, and others, not only fitted to wound their feel- 
 ings ; but to damage their characters and to destroy their influence 
 and usefulness in the congregation and neighbourhood, further, that 
 he has pursued for some time past a course of conduct most hurtful 
 to the interests of the congregation and to the cause of Christ in the 
 district ; so much so that it is quite impossible for the office-bearers 
 to discharge their duties with comfort to themselves, or benefit to 
 others, unless a decided check be given to such conduct ; and, finally, 
 that from the contempt Mr. J. Muil has shewn for them, and his un- 
 willingness to obey them as having the rule over him in the Lord, 
 they see no remedy but in having him cut off from the membership 
 of this congregation. Donald Mackay, Moderator, p.t., and Clerk, 
 P.t. 
 
 No. 11. 
 
 Deliverance of the Presbytery. 
 Mr. Murray moved — The Presbytery having considered the re- 
 ference, along with the letters and documents on which it is founded, 
 are of opinion that said letters and documents are of a nature calcu- 
 lated to damage the characters of the office-bearers and other mem- 
 bers of the congregation of Cluny, to disturb the harmony of the 
 congregation there, and otherwise to prove highly injurious to the 
 interests of religion in that district. The Presbytery therefore sus- 
 pend Mr. Muil sine die from church membership, and instruct the 
 session of Cluny not to restore Mr. Muil to the fellowship of the 
 
63 
 
 Church until he shall have expressed his regret for the conduct com- 
 plained of, and shall have otherwise satisfied them as to his genuine 
 repentance. 
 
 This motion was seconded by Mr. Wm. Smith, and was 
 supported by Messrs. Mackay and Siddie, and declared car- 
 ried. 
 
 No. 12. 
 
 A Free Kirk principal said I should illustrate my pamphlet with 
 " pictures " — I was inclined to do so — I collected some photographs, 
 intending to place Mr. R. Macdonald and Barbara Ellis on the first 
 page, and then in their order, the principals and ministers as leaders 
 (in the Free Kirk they do things by leaders and not always by law) 
 in the Session, the Presbytery, the Synod, and the General Assem- 
 bly ; Eev.'s D. Mackay, T. Murray, Principal Lumsden, and Dr. 
 Rainy. 
 
 I composed some verses describing the parts of the various actors 
 in the shameful farce, but was disuaded from publishing them on the 
 ground that it is not lawful to call a man a thief though imprisoned 
 for stealing. 
 
 I also composed a tune, with organ accompaniment (like Sankey), 
 to give the verses the benefit of vocal and instrumental music. Some 
 people doubt the propriety of using organs in divine worship. Every 
 one would think them right in a Jesuitical farce acted by the elite — 
 the highest f the ablest, and the holiest (ministers) in the Free Church, 
 to expel me for well-doing just as they are going to knock down (if 
 able) the Church of Scotland, now too unblemished for them, hop- 
 ing Mr. Yule, (who has failed to do what he was brought to Aberdeen 
 to do), says, to get from its ruins some " of the better sort " of its 
 members. Of course, men as consequential and spotless as himself, 
 Mr. R. Macdonald, Rev. Messrs. D. Mackay, T. Murray, et hoc genus 
 omne. If 1 have learnt truth by experience, an ' ' honest man, the 
 noblest work of God," would so excite holy indignation in Free Kirk 
 leaders and their followers, that they would agree in every court 
 without a cheep to burke him under pretence of doing God service. 
 
 Since my manuscript went to the press, a gentleman put a letter 
 to him from Mr. Macdonald into my hand, telling him that he was 
 
64 
 
 now cleared of the fama by letters from Barbara Ellis and her father, 
 Helen Brown, and James Bremner. He gave the gentleman these 
 letters to show me. I told him he had no right to interfere. I 
 meant to vindicate myself, and if Mr. Macdonald thought himself 
 aggrieved, he could publish the servants' letters, and apply to the 
 civil court. 
 
 The writers of the letters had spoken of Mr. Macdonald most in- 
 juriously, and I think he should have prosecuted them, and not have 
 taken certificates from them in a strain soinewliat at variance with 
 what they had openly said. Of course, he knows that letters are no 
 evidence, when the writers are available for examination. 
 
 The Principal would not give permission to engrave his photograph. 
 He declining, I did not apply to another. 
 
 So, " The Free Church of Scotland violating its Constitu- 
 tion " will lack the aid of poetry, painting and music, and 
 must set out on its mission, supported by facts alone. 
 
 The Free Presbytery of Aberdeen, of which Principal 
 Lumsden has been Cock, since Dr. Adam left, who kept him 
 in trim about the Gallowgate Mission, and otherwise, being 
 provoked at the abolition of Patronage, have, in spite of a 
 minority in it holding Disruption principles, and stating them 
 as it did in the Unioh business — ^been venting their spleen 
 at theChurch of Scotland, and befooling themselves by fight- 
 ing against Free Church principles, as they did in the Mutual 
 Eligibility Scheme, till the petitions stopped them. 
 
 The Principal is not over scrupulous. In his youth, he 
 abused Voluntaryism, and favoured Establishments. In his 
 old age, he abases the Establishment, and sides with Volun- 
 taryism. Reminded of this anomily (like Dr. Macleod about 
 the fourth commandment; " here explainin', there revokin"'), 
 he is attempting to convince the public, it seems, that what 
 he said, was not what he said. As one of the ringleaders in 
 the abortive Union business, and Mutual Eligibility Scheme, 
 he said, if not gainsaid, much to the annoyance and discredit 
 of the Church. He is reusable, and as he is not squeamish, 
 he says things at one time which can be cast effectively in 
 his teeth wlien roused the opposite way. 
 
65 
 
 By this, and the way he wrote of Voluntaryism, taken in 
 connection with his conduct in the Union committee, " an 
 imperium in imperio," and his vain-giorious inconsistent 
 speeches on Dis-establishment, he reminds me of Jeremiah 
 iii. 3. 
 
 Mr. Yule said, in the Free Presbytery of Aberdeen, that 
 the Church of Scotland has had its "innings," and other 
 Churches will have theirs." He said, also, " were there Free 
 Church ministers and elders in it, a party there could not 
 snap his fingers at discipline, creed, and doctrine." 
 
 Were it not that "the greatest thief cries first fy," he 
 must have held his tongue about " discipline," as the villiany 
 of the Free Kirk " discipline," alias burking, in my case 
 could not, if equalled, be exceeded in any church. Mr. Yule, 
 I hear, failed in his 'special sphere, his mission. His bre- 
 thren's labours too, being abortive, he made great debate to 
 get Messrs. Moody and Sankey, so much superior to them 
 for consistency, devotedness, and success, to Aberdeen. 
 Some doubt the propriety of Mr. Sankey's organ and his 
 hymns ; no one speaks against Mr. Moody's declaration that 
 " it is hard work to fight with Satan, but it is harder work to 
 fight with ministers." " Resist the Devil and he will flee 
 from you," not so, I fear. Free Kirk ministers doing the 
 devil's work, sticking up for one another, and fighting for 
 license to lynch-law, and burke as "the mind of Christ." 
 
 Though not one of the ablest Free Kirk ministers, Mr. 
 Yule is bustling and forward — perhaps impudent — and pre- 
 tends to be a "discipline " man, might he not, then, find 
 out two men as much superior to Free Kirk ministers at 
 " discipline " as Mersrs. Moody and Sankey at preaching and 
 singing the Gospel ? 
 
 If he did, as I have had my " innings " at " discipline," 
 the three deep " hielan' men," Macdonald, MacKay, and 
 Murray might then get their " innings " at " discipline " by 
 being suspended sine die. 
 
 The writers of Mr. Macdonald's fama certificates might 
 then be examined on oath as to what they knew of the fama, 
 and had said of him before they wrote ; and whether they 
 
ee 
 
 were paid for writing the certificates, and if so, how much, 
 and by whom. 
 
 It might be ascertained if Mr. Mackay's three " pretended 
 references of one date from one session book, were viUianous 
 forgeries, made up of only falsehoods ; and if he was an im- 
 poster in signing them clerk, p.t. And inquiry might be made 
 if Mr. Murray, in homologating Mr. Mackay's ^^ reference " 
 knew that it had nothing in it but falsehoods, while he made 
 it a pretence for " suspending " me " as he was determined 
 to put me out of the Church," thus making himself a scan- 
 dal to religion, and a disgrace to civilisation, by burking a 
 British subject. 
 
 " And grateful ' hielan' Tommy Murray, 
 To pay ' Mac. ' for a favour. 
 Might aid Mackay to throw Muil out 
 Wi' hypocrite palaver." 
 
 To the Editor of the Aberdeen Journal. ^ 
 
 Sir, 
 
 In last week's Journal you gave a report of a Disestablishment 
 meeting held at Banchory, on the Monday week previous. The chair- 
 man is reported as having said what is injurious to me. I trust you 
 will, therefore, allow me a smaU space in your widely circulated jour- 
 nal to-morrow, to reply to Mr. Reid's statement — "That when Mr. 
 Muil asked connection with the U.P. body, they asked him for a 
 character from his former Church. The Established Church did no 
 such thing, but took him in, and at once baptised his two children." 
 This statment, made so confidently, is a groundless, barefaced lie from 
 beginning to end — a pure falsehood, tending, if unchallenged, to dam- 
 age me and the Church of Scotland. Its nature being made known, 
 it can only damage himself, his " connection," and his cause. 
 
 The Pope claims infallibility, and Free Kirk ministers something simi- 
 lar — *' Spiritul Independence," — to "discipline " men as they like, for 
 truth. They would give such men " characters " if they become liars 
 and hypocrites, but if they hold the truth as martyrs, they get no 
 * * characters." I need no " character " from the Free Church, I mean 
 to give it one. I never was accused of anything as a Churchman. Mr. 
 Mackay, in a forged reference, made false charges that I had ca- 
 lumniated three errant office-bearers, and F. Christie, and J. J. Fyff'e, 
 and Lachlan Mackinnon threatened me with prosecution. It was a 
 
67 
 
 matter for the civil court. Mr. Mackay never even attempted to 
 prove these charges. I was willing to substantiate what I had said. 
 I was not allowed, but was "gagged and burked," yet as innocent as 
 Daniel. Though I needed no *' character " from the Free Church, I 
 needed extracts of the documents on which the Presbytery pretended 
 to ground its sentence of suspension. These I have in full. Mr. Reid 
 disobeyed the Presbytery, and did not furnish these in 1872, and the 
 Presbytery disobeyed the Assembly of 1873, and kept back a part of 
 them, yet Mr. Mackay, with apology, furnished what the Presbytery 
 culpably refused. 
 
 I would not have sought admission into any Church until I could 
 show it and the public legally the grounds on which I had been 
 suspended, in virtue of "Spiritual independence," to carry out the 
 "mind of Christ." 
 
 Few elders, oftenest none, attend meetings of the Presbytery. 
 Ministers are not so anxious for their presence to hamper them, as 
 they are for more stipend and " independence." At Presbytery 
 meetings, Mr. Reid is rather a great man, after a sort. I told him 
 I thought him " the Presbytery." He stamps his " character" on it. 
 For some time I have treated him much as Mordecai did Haman, and 
 now he scorns to destroy me alone, and must have the whole Church 
 of Scotland knocked down with me. Your report makes him appear 
 as somewhat of the "riff-raff" stamp. Were he sound and sane, 
 would he, when he had no chance to escape unscathed, tell what he 
 knew to be untrue, with the view of throwing odium on me, and 
 through me, on the Church of Scotland. By his mis-statement he 
 manifests much folly, and not a little animus, and if he makes no 
 reparation for his injustice to me and the Church of Scotland, he will 
 make a rent in his own "character," instead of, as he intended, 
 knocking down the Church of Scotland. 
 
 I am, yours truly, JOHN MUIL. 
 
 Nether Sauchen, February 2nd, 1875. 
 
 The impression that I should make application to this 
 year's Assembly is deepening. Having some experience of 
 Free Kirk leaders, I know I need not, unless I can " level 
 it so," shew that it will touch their *• pockets." I do not 
 know if they are all men of common sense and piety (1) they 
 are all ^' money " and " more money " (men). It is said by 
 Free Kirk ministers that the abolition of patronage is a com- 
 pliment to them and a proof that the disruption was right. 
 Perhaps they would take it as a compliment if the Church of 
 Scotland would " agitate " to shew Free Church members 
 
68 
 
 that they should not pay to the Sustentation Fund of a con- 
 gregation of which the minister has shewn himself, as in my 
 case, to be no better than a popish priest ; and in addition to 
 injustice to me, makes an undue noise about taking away 
 other ministers' stipends. He would thus have an experi- 
 mental acquaintance with the powers of members, and might 
 be led to consider that he may be left to " bark at the Church 
 of Scotland wi' a teem wame." As I was suspended only to 
 give me an opportunity of learning " my duty" of " genuine " 
 repentance for well-doing. A few congregations fully in- 
 formed of the real nature of my case, and the Free Kirks' 
 " Spiritual independence," might keep their " filthy lucre " 
 for a time till they saw if ministers would give me " a trial." 
 If they did not, they might let them see their minds ; and 
 other congregations might then be duly informed of parti- 
 culars, with a view to enable them to express their mind of 
 the way ministers shew " the mind of Christ." Just now it 
 might be advisable to lecture in one or two congregations. 
 
 In the mutual eligibility overtures, petitions took effect, 
 and they would do so again. To get them would be much 
 labour. One or two congregations might keep the collections 
 as a " sample," this would be no trouble, and would tell 
 better. 
 
 In 1873, Dr. Kainy said, anent the petitions, that High- 
 landers did not know voluntaries. Some ministers said others 
 who signed them were such asses that they did not know 
 what they did ; keeping a " grip o' the siller," they would 
 understand and feel. 
 
 The whole church, until vindicated, is implicated, as the 
 Jews in Achan's sin, in the injustice done me. It is a dis- 
 honour to the church's head and an insult to its members. 
 
 Though every minister were put out of a year's stipend, 
 he would not suffer so much, financially, as I have done.