0! 6\ 7 = 6l 7; 0: 5 ;:'>iiM : m tim ' >f f'- '-:.. ^ ■■',,* > .1. ■ hlil 1: / ^Hlimi*llAHI» J 1 1 ' ■'.i^-' i I Iv.U ^\ + 1 i Ji" a '^ ^X .4 1 i N- v' ' '■■■ •' . ^'.A' ..>:N '^ \^ ,N / ■{■■■ ^ M ^)? ;n^v^. '■'•wpv Or': ■ll fl „»>.- ^^^^1 -^c.>« :* '. "- i«*-> f f ! _' : i > i . JNIw ; : \ i ,- / " IHI - A - ■ 5^3 .1 '^M: M y-..-i^ f -""^^ T\ V 3 vr^ -, -(L-, ^yo-^j N e: V; YORK, 27 Be elcmai. THE I COMPLETE WORKS OF SHAKESPEARE, FROM THE ORIGINAL TEXT: CAREFULLY COLLATED AND COMPARED WITH THE EDITIONS OP HALLIWELL, KNIGHT, AND COLLIER- WITH HISTORICAL AND CRITICAL INTRODUCTIONS, AND NOTES TO EACH PLA^; AND A LIFE OF THE GREAT DRAMATIST, Br CHARLES KNIGHT. Illustr'atfb WITH KEW AND FINELY EXECUTED STEEL ENGRAVINGS, CHIEFLY PORTRAITS IN CHARACTER OF CELEBRATED AMERICAN ACTORS, DRAWN FROM LIFE EXPRESSLY FOR THIS EDITION. COINIEDIES. NEW YORK: JOHNSON, FRY AND COMPANY, 27 BEEKMAN-STREET. Entered, according to Act of Congress, By JOHNSON, FRY, AND COMPANY, la the Clerk's Ofl^ of tho District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York A\ V. f I>REFA.CE. Tide edition of Shakespeare's Complete Works now brought before the public, lias peculiar claims upon popular appreciation. It unites so many of the qualities most to be desired in such a book, whether for the library or the parlour table, that, in spite of the expense which they have been at in producing it, the publishers cannot but believe that they have supplied a want long felt in a country where the productions of him who has been justly said to jjossess the Greatest Name in all literature, receive even a wider and more intelligent admiration than in England itself. It was the aim of the publishers to bring an edition of the works of him who wrote for all time, issued in this elegant style and illustrated in the most attractive manner- within the reach of the intelligent masses of this country ; and they feel that in the appearance of this edition, in the excellence of its illustrations — each one of which is not only of interest as the portrait of some distinguished Shakespearian actor, but as an embodiment of one of the scenes of the great dramatist — they may take an honourable pride, as being far in advance of those of any similar publication ever issued here. But it was not only as a beautiful book, that the publishers desired that this edition of Shakespeare's works should commend itself to public favour. Purity of text, and such annotations as would explain all obsolete words and allusions, and make clear all obscure passages in that text, were equally sought after by them. Tlie text was therefore carefully collated by a competent Shakespearian scholar, with the editions of the three most distinguished Shakespearian editors of the day — John Payne Colliek, Charles Knight, and James Okohaed Halliwell ; and the notes are from the pen of the latter gentleman and of other eminent commentators, — care being taken that while they were amply sufficient to the elucidation of the text, they were neither so long as to diveit the reader's attention, nor so numerous as to cumber the volumes. The same care was taken with the historical and critical introductions, which contain the united vi PKKFAUE. judgments of the most distinguished Shakespearian critics and antiquaries of the pasi and present times. The Life is a condensation of Mr. Charles Knight's famous " Shake- speare : A Biography," which, with all its interest, was overloaded with much superfluous matter ; and the result is, that the reader, we may safely say, has here an edition which unites elegance of form, richness and interest of illustration, pui'ity of text, and valuable editorial matter, in a greater degree than any other that has ever been offered to the American public. THE fife iif l^illiaiii ll)iikri}{iiMirh BY CHARLES KNIGHT. On he 22d of August, 1485, there was a battle fought for the crown of England, a short battle ending in a decisive victory. The battle-field was Bosworth. Was there in that victorious army of the Earl of Richmond an Englishman bearing the name of Chacksper, or Shakespeyre, or Schakespere, or Schakespeire, or Schak- spere, or Shakcspere, or Shakspere,*^' — a martial name, however spelt ? Of the warlike achievements of this Shakspere there is no record : his name or his deeds would have no interest for us unless there had been born, eighty years after this battle-day, a direct de- scendant from him— " Whose niuse full of high thoui;ht> invention. Doth like himself heroicallj/ sound ;"t — a Shakspere, of whom it was also said — *' He seems to shake a lance As brandish 'd at the eyes of ignorance." $ A public document bearing the date of 1596 affirms of John Shakespeare, of Stratford-upon-Avon, the father of William Shakespeare, that his " parent and late an- tecessors were, for their valiant and faithful services, advanced and rewarded of the most prudent prince King Henry VII. of famous memory;" and it adds, ' ' si thence which time they have continued at those parts [Warwickshire] in good reputation and credit." Another document of a similar character, bearing the date of 1599, also affirms upon "creditable report," of "John Shakspere, now of Stratford-upon-Avon, in the county of Warwick, gentleman," that his "parent and great-grandfather, late antecessor, for his faithful and approved service to the late most prudent prince King Henry VII. of fiimous memory, was advanced and re- warded with lands and tenements, given to him in those parts of Warwickshire, where they have contin- • A list of the brethren and sisters of the Guild of Knowle, near EcyiDgton, in 'Warwicltshire, exhibits a ^eat number of the name cf Shalispere in that frali!rnity, from about 1460 to 1527; and the cames are spa with the diversity ^ere given, Shakspere being ttie latest. t Spenser X Ben JonsoD. ued by some descents in good reputation and credit." Such are the recitals of two several grants of arms to John Shakspere, confirming a previous grant made to him in 15G9. The great-grandson of the faithful and ai)proved ser- vant of Henry VII., John Shakespeare, was a burgess of the corporation of Stratford, and was in all prol)?- bility born about 1530. TTie family had continued in those parts, " by some descents ;" but how they were occupied in the business of life, what was their station in society, how they branched out into other lines of Shakespeares, we have no record. In 1599 John Shakespeare a second time went to the College of Arms, and, producing his own "ancient coat of arms," said that he had "married the daughter ami one of the heirs of Eobert Arden, of Wellingcote :'■ and then the heralds saj' — "We have likewise uiion one other escutcheon impaled the same with the ancient arms of the said Arden of Wellingcote." They add that John Shakespeare, and his children, issue, and posterity, may bear and use the same shield of arms, single or impaled. The family of Arden was one of the highest antiquity in Warwickshire. Dugdale traces its pedigree uninter- ruptedly up to the time of Edward the Confessor. The pedigree which Dugdale gives of the Arden family brings us no nearer in the direct line to the mother of Shakespeare than to Eobert Arden, her great-grand- father : he was the third son of Walter Arden, who married Eleanor, the daughter of John Hampden, of Buckinghamshire ; and he was brother to Sir John Arden, Squire for the body to Henry VII. Kobcrt's son, also called Eobert, was groom of the chamber to Henry VH. He married, and he had a son, also Eolien, who married Agnes Webbe. Their youngest daughtt-i was Mary, the mother of William Shakespeare. High as was her descent, weallhy and i)owerfnl as were the numerous branches of her family, Mary Arden, we doubt not, led a life cf usefulness as well as innocence, within her native forest hamlet. She had three sisters, and they all, with their niothei LIFE OF WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE. Agnes, survived their father, who died in December, 1556. His will is dated the 24th of November in the same year, and the testator styles himself "Robert Arden, of Wylmcote, in the paryclie of Aston Camit- low." MaiT, his youngest daughter, from superiority of mind, or some other cause of lier father's confidence, occupies the most prominent position in tlic will. She has an undivided estate and a sum of money ; and, from the crop being also bequeathed to her, it is evi- dent that she was considered able to continue the tillage. The estate thus bequeathed to her consisted of about sixty acres of arable and pasture, and a house ; and was called Asbies. In the winter of 155G was Mary Arden left without the guidance of a father, under this somewhat naked roof-tree, now become her own. Her sister Alice was to occupy another property in 'Wilmecote with her mother, provided the widow would so consent ; and she did consent. And so she lived a somewhat lonely life, till a young yeoman of Stratford, who had probably some acquaintance with her father, came to sit oftener and oftener upon the wooden benches in the old hall — a substantial yeoman, a burgess of the corporation in 1557 or 1558 ; and then in due season Mary Arden and John Shakespeare were standing before the altar of the parish churcli of Aston Cantlow, and the house and lands of Asbies became administered by one who took poEsession "by the right of the said Mary," who thenceforward abided for half a century in the good town of Stratford. There have been endless theories, old and new, affir- mations, contradictions, as to the worldly calling of John Shakespeare. Tliere are ancient registers in Stratford, minutes of the Common Hall, proceedings of the Court-leet, pleas of the Court of Eecord, writs, which have been hunted over with unwearied dili- gence, and yet they tell us notliing, or next to noth- ing, of John Shakespeare. Wiien lie was elected an alderman in 1505, we can trace out the occupations of his brotlicr aldermen, and readily come to the conclu- sion that the municipal authority of Stratford was vest- ed, as we may naturally suppose it to have been, in the hands of substantial tradesmen, brewers, bakers, butclicrs, grocers, victuallers, mercers, woollen-drapers. Trying into tlie secrets of time, we are enabled to form some notion of tlie literary acquirements of this wor- shipful body. On rare, very rare occasions, the alder- men and burgesses constituting tlie town council affixed their signatures, for greater solemnity, to some order of the court ; and on the 29th of September, in the sev- enth of Elizabeth, upon an order tliat John Wlieeler should take the office of bailiff, we have nineteen names subscribed, aldermen and burgesses. There is some- thing in this document which suggests a motive higher than mere curiosity for calling up these dignitaries froui their happy oblivion, saying to each, "Dost thou use to write thy name ? or hast thou a mark to thyself like an honest plain-dealing man ?" Alas! out of the nine- teen seven only can answer, "I thank God I hav;! been so well brought up that I can write my name." It is a matter of controversy whether Julin Shakespeare was one of the more clerkly corporators. We think he was ; others believe he was not. In 1556, the year that Rob- ert, the father of Mary Arden, died, John Shakespeare was admitted at the court-leet to two copyhold estates in Stratford. Tlie jurors of the leet present that George Turnor had alienated to John Shakespeare and his heirs one tenement, with a garden and croft, and other prem- ises, in Grenchyll-street, held of the lord at an annual quit-rent ; and John Shakespeare, who is present in court and does fealty, is admitted to the same. Tlio same jurors present that Edward West has alienated to John Shakespeare one tenement and a garden adjacent in Henley-street, who is in the same way admitted, upon fealty done to the lord. Here then is John Shakespeare, before Ids marriage, the purchaser of two copyholds in Stratford, both with gardens, and one with a croft, or small enclosed field. In 1570 John Shakespeare is holding, as tenant under William Clop- ton, a meadow of fourteen acres, w'it^ its appurtenance, called Ingon, at the annual rent of eight pounds Tliis rent, equivalent to at least forty pounds of our present money, would indicate that the appurtenance included a house, —and a very good house. This meadow of Ingon forms part of a large property known by that name near Clopton-house. When John Shakespeare married, the estate of Asbies, within a short ride of Stratford, came also into his possession. With these facts before us, scanty as they are, can we reasonably doubt that John Shakespeare was living upon his own land, renting the land of others, actively engaged in the business of cultivation, in an age when tillage was becoming rapidly profitable. — so much so that men of wealth very often thought it better to take the profits direct than to share them with the tenant ? And is all this, it may be said, of any importance in looking at the life of AVilliara Sliakcspcaie — a man who stands above all other individual men, above all ranks of men ; in comparison with whom, in Iiis per- manent influence upon mankind, generations of nobles, fighting men, statesmen, princes, are but dust? It is something, we think. It offers a better, because a more natural, explanation of the circumstances connected with the early life of the great poet than those stories whicli would make liim of obscure birth and servile employments. Take old Aubrey's story, the shrewd learned gossip and antiquary, who sur- vived Shakespeare some eighty years : — " Mr. William LIFE OF WILLIAM SUAKESPEARE. Shakespeare was born at Stratford-upon-Avon, in the county of Warwick. His father was a butcher, and I liavc been told licretofore by some of tlio neighbours Unit wlien lie wnsa boy he exercised liis father's trade ; I>iit wlien lie killed a calf he would do it in a high rityle, and make a speech. Tliere was at that time an- otlicr butcher's son in this town that was held not at all inferior to him for a natural wit, his acquaintance and coctanean, but died young." The story, however, has a variation. There was at Stratford, in the year ir/JS, a ck.rk of the parish church, eighty years old, — that is, he was three years old when William Shake- speare died, — and he, pointing to the monument of the poet, witli the pithy remark that he was the " best of his family," proclaimed to a member of one of the Inns of Court that this "Shakespeare was formerly in this town bound apprentice to a butcher, but that he ran from his master to London." His father was a butcher, says Aubrey ; he was apprenticed to a butcher, says the parish clerk. Akin to the butcher's trade is that of the dealer in wool. It is upon the authority of Betterton, the actor, wlio, in the beginning of the last century, made a journey into Warwickshire to collect anecdotes relating to Shakespeare, that Kowe tells us that John Shake- speare was a dealer in wool : — " His family, as appears by the register and public writings relating to that town, were of good figure and fashion there, and are mentioned as gentlemen. His father, who was a con- siderable dealer in wool, had so large a family, ten children in all, that, though he was his eldest son, he could give him no better education than his own em- ployment." Tradition is here, we think, becoming a little more assimilated with the truth. The considera- ble dealer in wool might very well have been the landed proprietor, the cultivator, that we believe John Shakespeare to have been. Nor indeed was the inci- dental business even of a butcher, a slayer and seller of carcasses, incompatible with the occupation of a land- holder. Harrison (1590), who mingles laments at the increasing luxury of the farmer with somewhat contra- dictory denouncements of the oppression of the tenant by the landlord, holds that the landlord is monopo- lizing the tenant's -profits : — " Most sorrovrful of all to understand, ihat men of great port and countenance are so far from suffering their farmers to have any gain at all, that lliey themsdi'es become graziers, butchers, tanners, suEEPMASTEiis, woodtneu, and Jenique quid non, thereby to cai'ich themcelves, and bring all the wealth ftf the country into their own hands, leaving the commonalty weak, or as an idol mth broken or feeble arms, which may in time of peace have a plausible show, but, when necessity shall enforce, have an heavy and bitter BCfiuel " Has not Harrison solved the mystery of the butcher, and explained the tradition of the wool- man ? There is an entry in the Bailiffs Court of Stratford, in 1555, which shows us one John Shakenpeare, a glover. It docs not follow that if this record be of the father of. William Shakespeare, a young man in 1.555, that he was always a glover. If he were a glover in 1555, he waa subsequently a holder of land- -a land proprietor.** The Register of Baptisms of the parish of Stratfurd- upon-Avon shows that Williajn, the son (;f John Shake- speare, was baptized on the '26th April, 15G4. And when born ? The want of such information is a defect in all parish-registers. Bapti