Necessary Basis of the Teach- er's Tenure BY ANDREW SLOAN DRAPER, LL. D. Commissioner of Education, State of New York SYRACUSE, N. Y. C. W. BARDEEN, PUBLISHER 1912 BY THE SAME AUTHOR Adaptation of the School to Industrial Ends, 50 cts. Agriculture and Its Educational Needs, 50 cts. American Education, $2.00. Desirable Uniformity and Diversity in Ameri- can Education, 50 cts. History of the Common School System of New York, 50 cts. Industry and Efficiency in Schools, 50 cts. What is Expected of District Superintend- ents, 50 cts. No Mummified History in New York Schools, 50 cts. Supervision of Country Schools, 50 cts. Trade Schools, Our School, Our Children, and Our Industries, 50 cts. Weaknesses in American Universities, 50 cts. This address was delivered November 28, 1911, before the Rural education section of the New York State Teachers Associa- tion, Albany, N. Y., and is reprinted with the speaker's permission from copy fur- nished by him. The Necessary Basis of the Teach- er's Tenure Much has been said for many years, in our educational conventions, about the desirability of a permanent tenure of position for all of the teachers in the State. It has seemed to me a trouble- some subject, but I am glad to say that as I have thought of it more carefully with a view to the preparation of this paper, some of the difficulties have dis- appeared. My conclusion is that the State might very safely, and probably with advantage to its schools, establish the principle that whenever a teacher is once employed the employment shall be 5 6 Necessary Basis of the Teacher's Tenure permanent, thereby meaning that the teacher shall be entitled to the position until he or she resigns or is removed by the trustees for a cause recognized by the law. But this principle can not safely be made universal in this State unless the right of removal for cause is to be strongly upheld and freely exercised, and unless the causes for removal are held to include all things which are not consistent with the complete and proper managenemt of the school and all things which do not make for the vital and efficient instruc- tion of pupils. No one must imagine that this is a mere matter of protecting teachers. Real teachers need little protection. If they are abused in one place, they ordinarily get a better place. Doubtless they do need to have their rights denned by law Necessary Basis of the Teacher's Tenure 7 and recognized by practice, so that the small number of contemptible men who get upon the boards of education may have notice and govern themselves ac- cordingly. But this is a matter which must turn not more not even so much upon the interests of the teachers as upon the good of the schools. And it may as well be said that I have no patience what- ever with teachers who agitate for their imaginary rights regardless of their draw- backs and misdoings Then our task is to distinguish the just rights from the selfish interests of the teacher, and to reconcile the just rights of the teacher with the best good of the schools. Per- haps it would be clearer if we turn it around and say that the problem is to determine what are the just rights of the teacher on the basis of the most good to 8 Necessary Basis of the Teacher's Tenure the schools. No one can, with an honest face, whether teacher or not, ask more or accept less than that. A protected tenure for teachers is no new thing with us. We have 43,017 teachers in the public schools of the State. Of these, 25,722 are in cities where the tenure is permanent, and 16,653 are in the union districts where the employment is from year to year and it is practically permanent if the teacher is reasonably satisfactory. So there are only 10,643 teachers outside of the cities and tinion districts whose employment is only from year to year and in the common thought of the district is wholly subject to the election of trustees. These country teachers are protected by law much more than they were. They have definite if not perpetual terms of employment; they Necessary Basis of the Teacher's Tenure 9 can not be dismissed within the term without cause; they have the contract in writing and they get their pay as often as every month. True, the Education Law prohibits a board in a union district from employing a teacher for a longer term than one year, and likewise prohibits a sole trustee from employing a teacher for a term extending beyond his own term of office. The reason for this is that these local boards and trustees too often employed favorites and entered into contracts which were not for the good of the schools. It must be obvious enough that no law can be upheld which does not have, for its first object, the good of the schools; and it must be obvious enough that the law has to deal with many school trustees who fail utterly or in very considerable measure 10 Necessary Basis of the Teacher's Tenure to intelligently promote the interests of the districts they are chosen to represent. But that does not shake the faith of in- telligent people in the decentralized sys- tem of school administration. We must never forget that our schools are the people's schools in a great sense that does not inhere in any other national system of education, and that there are the weightiest reasons why the people shall manage them directly to the fullest extent shown by experience to be com- patible with the good name of the schools and the efficiency of the teaching. When a board is mean and weak enough to sacrifice a good teacher in order to ap- point another, with the idea that it will do a favor for a friend or be of advantage to a political party, as sometimes happens, I regret it for two distinct reasons. First, Necessary Basis of the Teacher's Tenure 11 because of the outrage upon the teacher: one who can do such a thing as that deserves a dose of electricity not of course such a dose as the law prescribes for a man convicted of murder in the first degree, but such a jolt as will make him wonder why he was ever allowed to have anything to do with the management of schools. And second, because it limits and sets back the faith of the people, and particularly of experts, in so large a measure of popular and direct manage- ment of the schools. But we need not be discouraged. Where there is one trustee who abuses the trust, there are nine who execute it conscientiously, ac- cording to their lights, and the thing to do is to turn on the lights for the nine, and turn on enough voltage to kill, official- ly, the one. 12 Necessary Basis of the Teacher's Tenure But let us get into this a little more deeply. The school organization has checks and balances: it exacts much of teachers, and when it does that it en- ters into compensatory obligations. Teach- ers' certificates are earned by study. by experience, often by sacrifice: they ought to be worth something. They are of two different grades: that should and does mean differing values. Those of higher grade and therefore of larger value stand for more study, more experience, ripened spirit, proved adaptation to par- ticular and exacting duties, and complete devotion to the teacher's calling. The interests of the school system require not only that no school shall be taught except by a certificated teacher, that is by one of some proved capacity, but they also require advancing grades of certificates Necessary Basis of the Teacher's Tenure 13 representing increasing capacity and ma- turing adaptation and efficiency. This scheme of graded certificates calls for more and more study, sacrifice, and suc- cess. The school system can not exact all this without entering into reciprocal obligations. It must protect the certifi- cates. It must make them of the value to the teacher that they pretend to be. It must throw the strongest safeguards about the certificates that represent the most professional culture, and the longest and most successful service. This system of examining and certificat- ing teachers has been in operation in this state from the days of the Dutch West India Company. In all these three hun- dred years it has been growing more and more elaborate and complete. It has made rather rapid progress in the last 14 Necessary Basis of the Teacher's Tenure twenty-five years. It has in that time been placed upon a really rational and impregnable basis. It is a just system. It is incapable of special favors or resent- ments. Its rewards have to go to those who work for and deserve them: it is compelled to turn back the undeserving. In character, purpose and attainments, the teachers give exceptional support to, and have unusual claims upon, the pro- tection of the state. The state exacts much of them before it allows them to teach at all, and after they have com- menced it expects them to progress in culture and efficiency or leave the service. No business calls for greater expertness, aptness, and patience, than that of in- structing children. No one in the public service is more liable to be involved in misunderstandings with the people and Necessary Basis of the Teacher's Tenure 15 more subject to mistreatment by public officials, than are the teachers. As a class they are almost incapable of de- fending themselves. They realize that it is against good policy to be involved in controversy. If they have troubles, they are likely to be with people who are coarser than they are, and they would have small chance in a mere war of words or a mere measuring of strength with such. Surely the state which is depen- dent upon and claims all this is bound to protect as well as it can those who render it a really high and true service. The state has developed and it manages the system by which teachers are certifi- cated. All the states in the Union have done it, and New York far more completely than any other. For its own moral life and intellectual progress it says who 16 Necessary Basis of the Teacher's Tenure may and who shall not teach in the state's system of schools. There is some pro- tection in that if rationally done, and certainly so if it is justly progressive, because it does give merit its opportunity and it does save the competent and worthy from contact and competition with the incapable and the unworthy. But that only makes a mere beginning in the process of protection that is vital to the comfort and deserts of the teachers. The larger part of the task is not under the direct management of the state. The menace to the teacher comes not through the licensing system, but through the employment and the treatment by em- ployers. That is in the hands of 49 city boards of education, 623 union district boards, and the trustees in 9942 school districts. These boards and trustees are Necessary Basis of the Teacher's Tenure 17 changing continually. Thousands of new men and women are chosen every year. Nearly all of these new men and women have absolutely correct intentions, and most of them adjust themselves to the service of the schools in ways that do them credit. But some seek the responsi- bility which better and busier people would avoid in order to gain some end of their own; a few are naturally brutal; some have favorites to aid; some like to show their neighbors that they have power to do things no matter who suffers; some try to make patronage of the schools upon the false idea that it will aid a party ; and some would subordinate common schools to some denominational dogma and to the supposed advantage of some church. All this bears upon promotions, as well as original employment. Besides 18 Necessary Basis of the Teacher's Tenure thh, and whether new officials come in or not, one teacher in contact with the same families for a long time will gather their affections or their animosities in proportion to the length of service, and these will necessarily be reflected in the official acts of boards and trustees. In indescribable ways these things affect teachers; very often they affect teachers unjustly; and they will continue to do so until there are no trustees who are capable of injustice or until all of their doings are regulated by laws that are thoroughly enforced. Now anything that the state does to regulate the official conduct of local school officials is a limitation upon local self- government. That is undesirable where unnecessary. The more local school gov- ernment there is that is wise and just Necessary Basis of the Teacher's Tenure 19 and strong, the better will be the local schools and the stronger will be the state system of schools. It is not more a question of right than of expediency. The legislature would be entirely within its constitutional power if it were to take the employment and immediate control of teachers wholly away from local officers, but it would be a very un-American and a very unwise thing to do. The best attainable state system of schools will be assured when we discover the point of equipoise between state control and local management. And the longer the arm of that balance that is on the side of local independence, the better it is for the schools, the people, and the state. It is even better that local authority shall do many things which it does not do as well as the state might do them, because 20 Necessary Basis of the Teacher's Tenure the only way that people can learn to do them and get in the habit of doing them, is by doing them. But every citizen, every stranger within our gates, every moral and commercial interest of the state, has interests which are involved in the state's system of education; and therefore the state at large can not allow any section to be without sufficient schools to open the door of opportunity to the children of that section, and it can not allow local mismanagement to reconcile any district to schools that grow poorer and weaker rather than better and stronger. If you will show me just how little or how much the state must do to stimulate popular concern about the schools; what it must do or leave undone to lead towns and districts to know that they have very poor schools when their superintendent Necessary Basis of the Teacher's Tenure 21 and teachers lead them to think they have the best; what act or omission to act on the part of the state will impel the people of a city or district to courses which will force the school to give their children better training, you will not only point out the exact spot to which the state should go in exercising control over the local government of the schools, but also the exact spot at which it should stop. But we are not to be abashed by im- practicables who talk about the auto- cratic exercise of the state's power in education. It is the common educational opinion, and it is rapidly coming to be the popular opinion in America, that very few of the states go as far as they will have to go in stimulating local ini- tiative and in regulating and limiting ignorance, conceit, or viciousness in the 22 Necessary Basis of the Teacher's Tenure management of the schools. Healthy public opinion is everywhere in favor of every legal authority and every civic force, general or local, doing everything possible to energize education. And in practice the thing works smoothly enough. Look at the cities, towns, and districts of the state of New York. In the cities and best towns there are so many peo- ple, and so many who really know much about good schools; there is so much money invested in the business of the schools, and there are so many teachers whose rights have to be fixed and regarded, that the whole system ordinarily moves along smoothly enough. If there is a sane and efficient superintendent, the system grows better and better. If there is a poor one, a way comes in the course of time to get rid of him. If a conceited Necessary Basis of the Teacher's Tenure 23 or a corrupt board of education gets in control, it is regulated and after a while removed. The state exercises control only on the rare occasions when something very bad has developed. Ordinarily it has little or nothing to do in the com- munities where the best educational work is being done ; indeed, it gets support from, and it is glad to feel the control of, such cities and towns more than it supports or controls them. Indeed, its only power comes from them. It is where sentiment is low, rights uncertain, and the procedure unsettled; where there is little wholesome local initiative and no vital educational aggressiveness, that the aid and power of the state, that is the aid and power of the stronger districts, must go if the general excellence of the educational sys- tem is to promote, or even keep up with, 24 Necessary Basis of the Teacher's Tenure the material growth and the political significance of the state. The state has to legislate for general conditions, but the law is made for and felt most by the conditions that are the worst. The laws are inactive except in conditions that call for them. They must be active when and where necessary, Don't be super- ficial about this important matter. Think about it and you will be impressed with the fact that the men and women with whom education is a love and moral culture a passion never have their feelings outraged by any menace to education in the growing educational power and the quickened educational activity of the Empire state. It is only when something mean or wrong is done, by some misrep- resentative, in the fair name of the state, Necessary Basis of the Teacher's Tenure 25 that such men and women are heard from as they are bound to be. It may have occurred to you that I have been wandering from my theme, but the tenure of the teacher can not be well considered without an appeal to general principles that must of necessity be of state- wide application. The right to teach when employed is always regulat- ed and conferred by the state. In theory and pretence it has always been so, though until recent years it was delegated to local officers who often exercised their powers very ignorantly or abused them most outrageously. But while the power to certify teachers has always been re- served to the state, the power to employ them has always been conceded to the city or school district. And tenure is a matter of employment. Of course all 26 Necessary Basis of the Teacher's Tenure teachers are employed by public officers and all the doings of public officers are under the control of or within the reach of the law. How far should the state go in restricting the absolute freedom of boards of education and trustees to employ such certificated teachers, for such length of time, such pay, and such other conditions as they please? It has gone some length already: how much further should it go? How domineering and unjust shall the law allow an employing officer to be to a certificated teacher, when he has developed a penchant for parading his brief author- ity or has conceived a fancy for another teacher ? The answer is, I think, that we must believe in the people; that we must assume that boards of education and trustees are honest and sincere, as in nearly every Necessary Basis of the Teacher's Tenure 27 case they are; that the state must lay down the general principles within which they shall confine themselves, and then afford them the free right to use their discretion, within such confines, and ex- pect that they will perform their duties like honest men and women and according to the rule of reason. But while we be- lieve, and assume, and expect all this, we have experience enough to know that there will be many cases in which our benevolent assumptions will not be realized. The schools go on term after term and year after year, but the employing officers change continually. The vagaries are multitudinous and the conditions are kalaidoscopic. The state seems bound to protect its certificates, see that the teacher is protected against vagaries or something worse, and that the schools have 28 Necessary Basis of the Teacher' s Tenure steadiness and continuity of procedure. To that end it seems perfectly reasonable to me that a certificated teacher when once employed shall be given a tenure that shall continue until the position is vacated voluntarily or the teacher dis- missed for cause. But if the tenure of all teachers is to be permanent except for just cause, it will be necessary to extend the accepted or legal causes for which the services of teachers may be properly discontinued. If you are to make the principle general that a teacher once employed shall be employed as long as he wishes, or until just cause for a change arises, it will be necessary to leave the determination of what is just cause to the discretion of boards and trustees acting perhaps in co-operation with superintendents, until Necessary Basis of the Teacher's Tenure 29 it appears that such boards or trustees have been moved by bias, or pique, or had some interested motive which was sufficient to disqualify them for the proper execution of their very responsible trust. But there is much for teachers as well as trustees to think of. Any public em- ployee claiming a permanent tenure must maintain an exemplary character, offer particular preparation, accept the con- ditions and discipline incident to the employment, and render a service that steadily grows in value. Very likely the teachers do all of that more completely than any other class of public servants. But the teaching organization is not altogether exempted from the weaknesses of human nature. Permanency of tenure has some disadvantages as well as con- siderable justice in it. The weaker ones 30 Necessary Basis of the Teacher's Tenure take advantage of it. There is no one here familiar with the administration of schools in a considerable city under per- manent tenure, who does not know that if nothing but the efficiency of the teaching were considered, a considerable number of teachers would have to be removed at once, and then still others would have to be removed next year. A few will break down morally; some will become so slatternly as to make themselves intoler- able; other will become soured at the necessary discipline of the service, or estranged from the families they must serve; still others will stagnate profes- sionally, or actually recede in teaching attainments. The cause of half of this will be with the leadership, with the board, or the superintendent. The board may be un- Necessary Basis of the Teacher's Tenure 31 substantial or unjust, the superintendent may be a shallow pretender or a con- ceited martinet. Teachers know better than others do about the capacity and the moral integrity of an administration. They can not stand everything. There is not a large percentage of them that will not gladly follow a capable leadership, or respond to sane, frank, sincere, sympa- thetic criticism. A general and impera- tive condition to successful permanent tenure is that the administration and the supervision of the system shall not be of a kind which contributes to the causes which justify dismissal. But the system must progress. If it does not, the causes must be removed, and quite as much when they rest with the teacher as when they rest with the trustee. Can we specify the causes which shall 32 Necessary Basis of the Teacher's Tenure justly interrupt the employment of the teacher? Unsoundness of moral character is of course sufficient. Rebellion against discipline can have no other result. The management may be unjust and may justify a revolution, and if so there ought to be revolt, but teachers would better not think of it unless there is real cause for it, or without being armed with the facts and equipped with the strength which will make it successful. Finding a new place is sometimes better than revolt. Disagreements with families of the children in the school may justify forcing a change in the teacher; even though the change may not be justified on the ground of moral right, it may be better for the school and even better for the teacher. Conduct in life which, with- out being immoral, impedes efficiency Necessary Basis of the Teacher s Tenure 33 or brings discredit upon the schools, may be a sufficient cause for removal of the teacher. In common schools the teachers must regard the circumstances and opin- ions of all the people. Pedagogical reasons, lack of neatness and of control, the waning of the teaching power, may amply justify the termination of the employment. Teachers must keep their own agreements, either express or implied, in order to be in position to exact their rights. We can not assume that a teacher must be guilty of something that should send him to jail before he may be required to cease teaching in a particular place or altogether. He must attract good citizens, must grow in the teaching power and the teaching spirit, or they will be justified in wanting a change. All of the circumstances can not be anticipated, nor all of the causes 34 Necessary Basis of the Teacher's Tenure specified here or in the law. The good of the schools, the esprit de corps of the system, must settle the matter. It must be settled by the responsible authorities charged with the management of the particular school, and, if necessary, it must in the last analysis be determined by an authority that is without local bias or prejudice, that is sympathetic with teachers, that is in sympathy with parents also, that is intent upon the progress of schools, and that knows how to build up both the sure foundations and the more ornate superstructure of a school system with educational power in it. It would doubtless be better for the system and no more than just to the teachers if all employment was for an indefinite time, provided dismissal might be made very freely by honest trustees for any cause Necessary Basis of the Teacher's Tenure 35 recognized by the law or which would be sustained by the state Department. But whatever is done must be done in the open, at least so far as the teachers concerned wish to have it. It is not necessary that everything should be parad- ed before the public, but no teacher should be forced out of a place except upon notice, for a real cause which can be stated in writing. Of course the power of removal should generally be exercised with some reference to the time of year ; for immorality it should be summary; for any cause which menaces the discipline and routine of the school it may properly be speedy; for any reason which is subtantial but not immediately urgent, it should be delayed until the close of the school year. The right of dismissal for cause should apply to the higher officers and principals 36 Necessary Basis of the Teacher's Tenure even more rigidly than to class teachers. If for any cause whatever the deliberate sentiment of a community wants a change in the office of superintendent of schools or principal of the high school, that senti- ment ought to be respected. Of course it must act decently and without senseless precipitancy. But no self-respecting man worthy of a high place in the schools can wish to remain in a place where the delibe- rate judgment of a respectable board and the settled sentiment of the community are against him. Public sentiment is ordinarily favorable enough to teachers. Often it is too favorable. It is sometimes so considerate, without full knowledge, that demagogues play upon it. When it is adverse it must be accepted. The power of the people and of their representa- tives over the teaching body in their Necessary Basis of the Teacher's Tenure 37 schools, acting within the limitations of the law and according to the moral prin- ciples which we all ought to understand, must be absolute. Nothing has been said about pensions or retiring allowances for worn-out teachers. It is a subject by itself, and to me a trouble- some one. I have always held off about this because of my inherent opposition to a state pension system. But some- thing will have to be done, not only in justice to teachers who have worn them- selves out for small pay in the public service, but for the sake of the schools which can not cast these worthy teachers out even though their efficiency is over and they need a little period of rest on earth before the rest everlasting. We have been doing something in this direc- tion in the last year. Much more will 38 Necessary Basis of the Teacher's Tenure have to be done if there is to be early or substantial result. In the meantime, if some millionaire wants to do a great deal for education in New York, why does he not create a fund for the relief of exhausted teachers of long service in the public schools, and therefore for the uplift of the public schools themselves ? The state has opened the way: why will not some men and women with means walk in it? Is nothing but a college or a university worthy the thought of a man or woman with money? Then my conclusions, stated in a para- graph, are that the employment and pro- motion and compensation and discon- tinuance of all teachers should continue to be the functions of officials chosen by the people in the cities and school dis- tricts. We must continue to decentralize Necessary Basis of the Teacher's Tenure 39 administration to the fullest extent con- sistent with efficiency and progress. But the educational system is the state's system, and the state must regulate it by law so far as experience shows to be necessary for its good, taking it in its entirety. When once employed the ser- vice of all the teachers might well con- tinue until interrupted by death, resigna- tion, or discontinuance by authority for cause. There is no apparent reason why one teacher should go out and another come in merely because boards and trustees change. But with the more permanent tenure the teachers will have to show more preparation, adaptation to particular position, and professional progress. The causes of removal and the procedure will have to be thoroughly regulated by law. Everything will have to be done in the open. The trustee who removes a teacher 40 Necessary Basis of the Teacher's Tenure through malice or to make an opening for a favorite, should be punished for it. The right to appeal from local action to state authority as to the justness of the removal will have to be well recognized. There the quibbles of pettifoggers will have to be brushed aside, and an ultimate decision made as to whether the removal was free from bad motive and unreasonable official conduct, and whether, without injustice to any legal right of 'the teacher and with an eye only to the good of the school, it should be sustained. The pro- gress of the school is the paramount matter; there is no more reason why the state should permit the school to be ar- rested, should permit the whole system to be weakened, in the interests of weak, unprogressive, or worn-out teachers, than why it should permit it to be menaced by Necessary Basis of the Teacher's Tenure 41 the meanness or the badness of boards and trustees. Teachers who do not grow in professional culture and teaching spirit have small claims: those who do advance in these things have claims that are irresistible and that are widely recognized. It is to the interest of the state to guard them. All that is necessary is to write down the legal principles that properly apply and set up the administrative practice that ought to prevail. There is no great difficulty about it. The interests of teachers who deserve protec- tion, and the interests of schools that deserve to advance are altogether con- sistent; and the complete reconciliation of these interests in the Education Law is likely to contribute as much as anything else can to uphold the honor and promote the progress of the state. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY, BERKELEY THIS BOOK IS DUE ON THE LAST DATE STAMPED BELOW expiration of loan period. IMG 1 1921 UL 31 1925 APR 1 5 200 20w-ll,'20 255818 - '