VILLAGE-COMMUNITIES EAST AND WEST. BY THE SAME AUTHOR. ANCIENT LAW: ITS CONNECTION WITH THE EARLY HISTORY OF SOCIETY, AND ITS RELATION TO MODERN IDEAS. 4th Edition, 8vo. 12s. VILLAGE-COMMUNITIES IN THE EAST AND WEST. SIX LECTURES DELIVERED AT OXFORD BY HENEY SUMNEE MAINE, CORPUS PROFESSOR OF JURISPRUDENCE IN THE UNIVERSITY, FORMERLY LAW MEMBER OF THK SUPREME (iOVKRXMENT OF INDIA, AUTHOR. OF ' ANCTEX.T LAW.' LONDON : JOHN MUEEAY, ALBEMARLE STREET. 1871. The riglit of translation in reserved. pniNTKn BY SPOTTISWOODK AND CO., NJiW-STRKET 8QUAKI AND PAULIAMliM' STKKKT PREFACE. THE Six LECTURES which follow were designed as an introduction to a considerably longer Course, of which the object was to point out the importance, in juridical enquiries, of increased attention to the phenomena of usage and legal thought which are observable in the East. , The writer had not intended to print these Lectures at present; but it appeared to a part of his audience that their publication might possibly help to connect two special sets of investi- gations, each of which possesses great interest, but is apparently conducted in ignorance of its bearing on the other. The fragmentary character of the work must be pleaded in excuse for the non-performance of some promises which are given in the text, and for some digressions which, with reference to the main subject of discussion, may appear to be of un- reasonable length. The eminent German writers whose conclusions VI PREFACE. are briefly summarised in the Third and Fifth Lectures are comparatively little known in England, and a list of their principal works is given in the Second Appendix. For such knowledge of Indian phenomena as he possesses the writer is much in- debted to the conversation of Lord Lawrence, whose capacity for the political direction of the natives of India was acquired by patient study of their ideas and usages during his early career. The principal statements made in the text concerning the Indian Village Communities, have been submitted to Mr. George Campbell, now Lieut. -Governor of Bengal, who has been good enough to say that they coincide in the main with the results of his own experience and observation, which have been very extensive. No general assertions are likely to be true without large qualification of a country so vast as India, but every effort has been made to control the state- ments of each informant by those of others. Some matter has been introduced into the Lectures which, for want of time, was omitted at their de- livery. February 1871. CONTENTS. LECTURE I. THE EAST, AND THE STUDY OF JURISPRUDENCE. Comparative Jurisprudence Comparative and Historical Methods The Past and the Present Limits of Comparative Jurisprudence Method of Comparison Enquiries of Von Maurer The Mark and English Law Eastern and Western Communities Characteris- tics of Indio-Modern Theories of Race The Patriarchal Family Barbarous Forms of the Family Origin of Law in the Family Village Community Law of Nature Codified Brahminical Law Feudal System Conditions of Juridical Study English Ignor- ance of India Disappearance of Indian Phenomena Influence of Western Ideas Influence of Physical Science Influence of British Empire PAGE 1 LECTURE II. THE SOURCES OF INDIAN LAW. Indian Settlements Settlement and Revenue Courts The Civil Courts The Indian Judicial System The Supreme CourtsEnglish Law in India Indian Opinion on English Law Locality of Custom The Will of Bengal Wills and Collective Property A. Modern Indian Will The Sudder Court Influence of Sudder Courts De- velopment of Hindoo Law Effect of Juridical Commentaries The Bar and English Law Mahometan Law The Pundits Codified Hindoo Law Varieties of Native Usage The Written Law Hindoo Widow's Estate Preservation of Customary Law Caste in India Tradition Different Forms of Tradition Popular Ignorance of Law in England The Experts and English Law Indian and Teutonic Village Systems 29 / Vlll CONTENTS. LECTURE III. THE WESTERN VILLAGE COMMUNITY. Antiquity of Indian Customary Law Traditional Law Analysis of a Law Indian Conceptions of Law English Influence on Legal Con- ceptions Unwilling Assumption of Sovereignty Influence of Courts of Justice Change in Nature of Usage Growth of Conception of Right Influence of English Law Connection of Eastern and Western Custom Von Maurer The Teutonic Village Community The Arable Mark English Theories of Land-Law The Arable Mark in England Shifting Severalties The Common Fields Their Great Extent Extract from Marshall Scott on Udal Tenures Commonty of Lauder Peculiarities of Scottish Example Vestiges of the Mark PAGE 63 LECTURE IV. THE EASTERN VILLAGE COMMUNITY. The Indian Village Community Mahometan Theory of Ownership Land Settlement of Bengal The Indian Proprietary Unit The Indian Village The Cultivated Land The Growth of Custom Water Rules The Sources of Primitive Law Customs of Re- partition The Village Secrecy of Family Life Dislike of English Criminal Law Fictions Attending Legislation Village Rules Origin of Indian Towns Indian Capitals The Village Waste The Indian Wastes The Government and the Wastes The Village Council Peaceful Character of Population Hereditary Trades Remuneration of Village Traders The Outsiders Absorption of Strangers by Community . 101 LECTURE V. THE PROCESS OF FEUDALISATION. Feudalism The Benefices The Manor The Manorial Group New Condition of the Waste Changes in the Grass-lands The Free Tenants Settlements of Villeins The Manorial Courts Encroach- ments of the Lord Roman and Feudal Law Causes of Feudalisation Growth of Suzerainties Leading Families Elements of Feudal System Systematic Feudalism Antiquarianisni of Indian Politics Political K'si.iltfi of Settlements Various Forms of Settlement CONTENTS. IX Growth in Power of Official Holder Mahometan Assumptions Indian Schools of Opinion Indian Forms of Property The Headman Property Recognised by the English Absolute Ownership Nature of Rights of Property Development of Absolute Ownership Vested Rights in India The Feudalisation of Europe Cultivation of Waste-land Improvements in Tillage Village Communities and Customs Customary Tillage Servile Dependants of Villagers Villages cease to absorb Strangers Nasse's Work The Statute of Devises Rules for Construing Wills Restraints on Testamentary Power . PAGE 129 LECTURE VI. THE EARLY HISTORY OF PRICE AND RENT. Structure of Village Communities Divisions of the Community Pro- perty within the Community Traditions as to Rights Exactions of Indian Sovereigns Indian Rent Difficulty of Question Anglo- Indian Ideas Customary and Competition Rents The Protected Tenants Indian and English Forms of Property True Character of Problem The Irish Clan Rack-Rent paid by Strangers Primitive Notions as to Price Early Measure of Price Basis of Political Economy The Market Markets and Neutrality Influence of Market Law Sentiments adverse to Political Economy Primitive Com- mercial Principles Influence of Carrying Trade Price and Rent Market for Land in England New Information required Village Communities in America ........ 173 APPENDICES 203 INDEX 217 Errata. Page 7, line 15, for it is removed from it read one is removed from the other. Page 61, line 16, for coincidence with the writers read coincidence with the conclusions of the writers. Page 168, line 24, insert the words Writers on the between the word English and the word records. Maine's Village Communities. VILLAGE -COMMUNITIES IN THE EAST AND WEST. LECTURE /. THE EAST, AND THE STUDY OF JURISPRUDENCE, B CONTENTS. Comparative Jurisprudence Comparative and Historical Methods The Past and the Present Limits of Comparative Jurisprudence Method of Comparison Enquiries of Von Maurer The Mark and English Law Eastern and Western Communities Characteris- tics of Indio-Modern Theories of Race The Patriarchal Family Barbarous Forms of the Family Origin of Law in the Family Village Community Law of Nature Codified Brahminical Law Feudal System Conditions of Juridical Study English Ignorance of India Disappearance of Indian Phenomena Influence of Western Ideas Influence of Physical Science Influence of British Empire. LECT. i. THE STUDY OF JURISPRUDENCE. LECTURE I. THE EAST, AND THE STUDY OF JURISPRUDENCE. IN the Academical Statute which defines the duties of the Professor of Jurisprudence, the branches of en- quiry to which he is directed to address himself are described as the investigation of the history and principles of law, and the comparison of the laws of various communities. The lectures to which I am about to ask your attention will deal in some detail with the relation of the customary law of the East, and more particularly of India, to the laws and usages, past and present, of other societies ; but, as we are employed upon a subject and this is a warning which cannot be too soon given in which ambiguities of expression are extraordinarily common and extremely dangerous, I perhaps should state at once that the comparison which we shall be making will not con- stitute Comparative Jurisprudence in the sense in which those words are understood by most modern jurists, or in that which, I think, was intended by the authors of the statute. Comparative Jurisprudence in this last sense has not for its object to throw light upon B 2 COMPARATIVE JURISPRUDENCE. LECT. I. the history of law. Nor is it universally allowed that it throws light upon its philosophy or principles. What it does, is to take the legal systems of two dis- tinct societies under some one head of law as for example some one kind of Contract, or the department of Husband and Wife and to compare these chapters of the systems under consideration. It takes the heads of law which it is examining at any point of their historical development, and does not affect to discuss their history, to which it is indifferent. What is the relation of Comparative Jurisprudence, thus understood, to the philosophy of law or the determi- nation of legal principle, is a point on which there may be much difference of opinion. There is not a little in the writings of one of the greatest of modern juridical thinkers, John Austin, which seems to imply that the authors and expositors of civilised systems of law are constrained, by a sort of external compul- sion, to think in a particular way on legal principles, and on the modes of arriving at juridical results. That is not my view ; but it is a view which may de- serve attentive consideration on some other occasion. It would, however, be universally admitted by com- petent jurists, that, if not the only function, the chief function of Comparative Jurisprudence is to facilitate legislation and the practical improvement of law. It is found, as matter of fact, that when the legislators (and I here use the term in its largest sense) of dif- LECT. I. COMPARATIVE JURISPRUDENCE. ferent communities pursue, as they frequently do, the same end, the mechanism by which the end is at- tained is extremely dissimilar. In some systems of law, the preliminary assumptions made are much fewer and simpler than in others ; the general propo- sitions which include subsidiary rules are much more concise and at the same time more comprehen- sive, and the courses of legal reasoning are shorter and more direct. Hence, by the examination and, comparison of laws, the most valuable materials are obtained for legal improvement. There is no branch of juridical enquiry more important than this, and none from which I expect that the laws of our coun- try will ultimately derive more advantage, when it has thoroughly engrafted itself upon our legal educa- tion. Without any disparagement of the many un- questionable excellences of English law the eminent good sense frequently exhibited in the results which it finally evolves, and the force and even the beauty of the judicial reasoning by which in many cases they are reached it assuredly travels to its conclusions by a path more tortuous and more interrupted by fictions and unnecessary distinctions than any system of jurisprudence in the world. But great as is the influence which I expect to be exercised in this coun- try by the study of Comparative Jurisprudence, it is not that which we have now in hand ; and I think it is best taken up at that stage of legal education at 6 COMPAEATIVE AND HISTORICAL METHODS. LECT. i. which the learner has just mastered a very difficult and complex body of positive law, like that of our own country. The student who has completed his professional studies is not unnaturally apt to believe in the necessity, and even in the sacredness^ of all the technical rules which he has enabled himself to command ; and just then, regard being had to the in- fluence which every lawyer has over the development of law, it is useful to show him what shorter routes , to his conclusions have been followed elsewhere as a matter of fact, and how much labour he might consequently have been spared. The enquiry upon which we are engaged can only be said to belong to Comparative Jurisprudence, if the word 4 comparative ' be used as it is used in such expressions as 4 Comparative Philology ' and 4 Comparative Mythology.' We shall examine a number of parallel phenomena with the view of establishing, if possible, that some jQL.th.em are re- lated to one another in the order of historical succes- sion. I think I may venture to affirm that the Com- parative Method, which has already been fruitful of such wonderful results, is not distinguishable in some of its applications from the Historical Method. We take a number of contemporary facts, ideas, and customs, and we infer the past form of those facts, ideas, and customs not only from historical records of that past form, but from examples of it which LECT. i. THE PAST AND THE PRESENT. 7 have not yet died out of the world, and are still to be found in it. AVhen in truth we have to some ex- tent succeeded in freeing ourselves from that limited conception of the world and mankind, beyond which the most civilised societies and (I will add) some of the greatest thinkers do not always rise; when we gain something like an adequate idea of the vast- ness and variety of the phenomena of human s ociety ; when in particular we have learned not to exclude from our view of earth and man those great and unexplored regions which we vaguely term the East, we find it to be not wholly a conceit or a para- dox to say that the distinction between the Present and the Past disappears. Sometimes the Past is the Present; much more often' ft is removed from by varying distances, which, however, cannot be estimated or expressed chronologically. Direct observation comes thus to the aid of historical enquiry, and historical enquiry to the help of direct observation, f The characteristic difficulty of the historian is that recorded evidence, however saga- ciously it may be examined and re-examined, can very rarely be added to; the characteristic error of the direct observer of unfamiliar social or juridical phenomena is to compare them too hastily with familiar phenomena apparently of the same kind. But the best contemporary historians, both of England and of Germany, are evidently striving to 8 LIMITS OF COMPARATIVE JURISPRUDENCE. LECT. i. increase their resources through the agency of the Comparative Method ; and nobody can have been long in the East without perceiving and regretting that a great many conclusions, founded on patient personal study of Oriental usage and idea, are vitiated through the observer's want of acquaintance with some elementary facts of Western legal history. I should, however, be making a very idle pre- tension if I held out a prospect of obtaining, by the application of the Comparative Method to juris- prudence, any results which, in point of interest or trustworthiness, are to be placed on a level with those which, for example, have been accomplished in Comparative Philology. To give only one reason, the phenomena of human society, laws and legal ideas, opinions and usages, are vastly more affected by external circumstances than language. They are much more at the mercy of individual volition, and consequently much more subject to change effected deliberately from without. The sense of expediency or convenience is not assuredly, as some great writers have contended, the only source of modification in law and usage; but still it undoubtedly is a cause of change, and an effective and powerful cause. The conditions of the convenient and expedient are, however, practically infinite, and nobody can reduce them to rule. And however mankind at certain stages of development may dislike to have their . METHOD OF COMPARISON. 9 usages changed, they always probably recognise certain constraining influences as sufficient reasons for submitting to new rules. There is no country ,\ probably, in which Custom is so stable as it is in India ; yet there, competing with the assumption that Custom is sacred and perpetual, is the very general admission that whatever the sovereign com- mands is Custom. The greatest caution must there- fore be observed in all speculations on the inferences derivable from parallel usages. True, however, as this is, there is much to encourage further attention to the observed phenomena of custom and further observation of customs not yet examined. To take very recent instances, I know nothing more striking among Mr. Freeman's many contributions to our historical knowledge than his identification of the fragments of Teutonic society, organised on its primitive model, which are to be found in the Forest Cantons of Switzerland. This, indeed, is an example! of an archaic political institution which has survived to our day. The usages which it has preserved are rather political than legal ; or, to put it in another way, they belong to the domain of Public rather than to that of Private law. But to usages of this last class clearly belong those samples of ancient Teutonic agricultural customs and ancient Teutonic forms of property in land which Von Maurer has found to occur in the more backward parts of Germany. I 10 ENQUIRIES OF VON MAUEER. LECT. i. shall have to ask a good deal of your attention here- after to the results announced by the eminent writer whom I have just named; at present I will confine myself to a brief indication of his method and con- clusions and of their bearing on the undertaking we have in hand. " Von Maurer has written largely on the Law of the Mark_jor_Jpwnship,. and on the Law of the Manor. The Township (I state the matter in my own way) was an organised, self-acting group of Teutonic families, exercising a common proprietor- ship over a definite tract of land, its Mark, cultivat- ing its domain on a common system, and sustaining itself by the produce. It is described by Tacitus, in the 'Germany 7 as the 'vicus'; it isfwell known to * 7 i ., ! have been the proprietary and even the political unit of the earliest English society ; it is allowed to have existed among the Scandinavian races, and it sur- vived to so late a date in the Orkney and Shetland Islands as to have attracted the personal notice of Walter Scott. In our own country it became ab- sorbed in larger territorial aggregations, and, as the movements of these larger aggregations constitute the material of political history, the political histo- rians have generally treated the Mark as having greatly lost its interest. Mr. Freeman speaks of the politics of the Mark as having become the politics of the parish vestry. But is it true that it has lost LECT. i. THE MAKE AND ENGLISH LAW. 11 its juridical, as it lias lost its political importance ? It cannot reasonably be doubted that the Family was the great source of personal law ; are there any reasons for supposing that the larger groups, in which Families are found to have been primitively combined for the purposes of ownership over land, were to anything like the same extent the sources of proprietary law ? J5ojar as L_pur^ own country is con- cerned, the ordinary text-books of our law suggest no such conclusion ; since they practically trace our land-law to the customs of the Manor, and assume the Manor to have been a complete, novelty intro- duced into the world during the process which is called the feudalisation of Europe. But the writings of Von Maurer, and of another learned German who has followed him, Nasse of Bonn, afford strong reason for thinking that this account of our legal history should be reviewed. The Mark has through a great part of Germany stamped itself plainly on land-law, on agricultural custom, and on the territorial distri- bution of landed property. JS[asse has called atten- tion to the vestiges of it which are still discoverable in England, and which, until recently, were to be found on all sides of us ; and he seems to me to have at least raised a presumption that the Mark is the true source of some things which have never been satisfactorily explained in English real-property law. The work of Professor Nasse appears to me to 12 EASTERN AND WESTERN COMMUNITIES. LECT. i. require some revision from an English professional lawyer; but, beyond attempting this, I should pro- bably have left this subject in the hands of writers who have made it their own, if it were not for one circumstance. These writers are obviously unaware of the way in which Eastern phenomena confirm their account of the primitive Teutonic cultivating group, and may be used to extend it. The Village Community of India exhibits resemblances to the Teutonic Township which are much too strong and numerous to be accidental; where it differs from the Township,Jthe difference may be at least plausibly explained, i It has the same double aspect of a group of families united by the assumption of common kin- ship, and of a company of persons exercising joint ownership over land. The domain which it occupies is distributed, if not in the same manner, upon the same principles; and the ideas which prevail within the group of the relations and duties of its members to one another appear to be substantially the same. But the Indian Village Community is a living, and not a dead, institution. The causes which trans- formed the Mark into the Manor, though they may be traced in India, have operated very feebly ; and over the greatest part of the country the Village Community has not been absorbed in any larger col- lection of men or lost in a territorial area of wider extent. For fiscal and legal purposes it is the pro- LECT. i. CHARACTEKISTICS OF INDIA. 13 prietary unit of large and populous provinces. It is under constant and careful observation, and the doubtful points which it exhibits are the subject of the most earnest discussion and of the most vehe- ment controversy. No better example could there- fore be given of the new material which the East, and especially India, furnishes to the juridical enquirer. If an ancient society be conceived as a society iii\ which are found existing phenomena of usage and legal thought which, if not identical with, wear a strong resemblance to certain other phenomena of the same kind which the Western world may be shown to have exhibited at periods here belonging chronologically to the Past, the East is certainly full of fragments of ancient society. Of these, the most instructive, because the most open to sustained observation, are to be found in India. The country is an assemblage of such fragments rather than an ancient society complete in itself. The apparent uniformity and even monotony which to the new comer are its most impressive characteristics, prove, on larger experience, to have been merely the cloudy outline produced by mental distance ; and the observation of each succeed- ing year discloses a greater variety in usages and ideas which at first seemed everywhere identical. Yet there is a sense in which the first impressions of the Englishman in India are correct. Each indi- vidual in India is a slave to the customs of the 14 MODERN THEORIES OF RACE. LECT. i. ^oupjto wluch^ie^ belongs; and the customs of the several groups, various as they are, do not differ from one another with that practically infinite variety of difference which is found in the habits and practices of the individual men and women who make up the modern societies of the civilised West. A great number of the bodies of custom observable in India are strikingly alike in their most im- portant features, and leave no room for doubt that they have somehow been formed on some common model and pattern. After all that has been achieved in other departments of enquiry, there would be no great presumption in laying down, at least provisionally, that the tie which connects these various systems of native usage is the bond of com- mon race between the men whose life is regulated by them. If I observe some caution in using that language on the subject of common race which has become almost popular among us, it is through con- sciousness of the ignorance under which we labour of the multitudinous and most interesting societies which envelope India on the North and East. Everybody who has a conception of the depth of this ignorance will be on his guard against any theory of the development or inter-connection of usage and primitive idea which makes any preten- sions to completeness before these societies have been more accurately examined. LECT. i. THE PATRIARCHAL FAMILY. 15 Let me at this point attempt to. indicate to you the sort of instruction which India may be expected to yield to the student of historical jurisprudence. There are in the history of law certain epochs which appear to us, with such knowledge as we possess, to mark the beginning of distinct trains of legal ideas and distinct courses of practice. One of these is the ; ,.?j formation of the ^Patriarchal Family, a group of men and women, children and slaves, of animate and in-y ^ animate property, all connected together by common subjection to the Paternal Power of the chief of the household. I need not here repeat to you the proof '' which I have attempted to give elsewhere, that a great part of Jbhe Jegal ideas of civilised races_ may^ be traced to this conception, and that the history of their development is the history of its slow unwinding. You may, however, be aware that some enquirers have of late shown themselves not satisfied to accept the Patriarchal Family as a primary fact in the history of society. Such dis- inclination is, I think, very far from unnatural. The Patriarchal Family is not a simple but a highly complex group, and there is nothing in the super- ficial passions, habits, or tendencies of human nature which at all sufficiently accounts for it. If it is really to be accepted as a primary social fact, the explanation assuredly lies among the secrets and mysteries of our nature, not in any characteristics 16 BARBAROUS FORMS OF THE FAMILY. LECT.. i. which are on its surface. Again, under its best ascertained forms, the Family Group is in a high degree artificially constituted, since it is freely re- cruited by the adoption of strangers. SJA11 this justi- fies the hesitation which leads to further enquiry ; and it has been strongly contended of late, that by in- vestigation of the practices and ideas of ^existing savage races, at least two earlier stages of human society disclose themselves through which it passed before organising itself in Family Groups. In two separate volumes, each of them remarkably ingenious and interesting, Sir John Lubbock and Mr. McLennan conceive themselves to have shown that the first steps of mankind towards civilisation were taken from a condition in which assemblages of men followed practices which are not found to occur universally even in animal nature. Here I have only to observe that many of the phenomena of barbarism adverted to by these writers are found in India. The usages appealed to are the usages of certain tribes or races, sometimes called aboriginal, which have been driven into the inaccessible recesses of the widely extending mountain country on the north-east of India by the double pressure of Indian and Chinese civilisation, or which took refuge in the hilly regions of Central and Southern India from the conquest of Brahminical invaders, whether or not of Aryan descent. Many of these wild tribes have now for many years been LECT. i. OJBIGIX OF LAW IN THE FAMILY. 17 under British ohsopvafcierr, and have indeed been ___^- *= ~ .L administered by British Officers. The evidence, therefore, of their usages and ideas which is or may be forthcoming, is very superior indeed to the slippery testimony concerning savages which is gathered from travellers' tales. It is not my inten- tion in the present lectures to examine the Indian evidence anew, but, now that we know what interest attaches to it, I venture to suggest that this evidence should be carefully re-examined on the spot. Much which I have personally heard in India bears out the caution which I gave as to the reserve with which all speculations on the antiquity of human usage should be received. Practices represented as of im memorial antiquity, and universally characteristic o the infancy of mankind, have been described to me as having been for the first time resorted to in oui own days through the mere pressure of externa circumstances or novel temptations. Passing from these wild tribes to the more ad- \ vanced assemblages of men to be found in India, it may be stated without any hesitation that the rest j** of the Indian evidence, whencesoever collected, gives colour to the theory of the origin of a great part of law in the Patriarchal Family. I may be able hereafter to establish, or at all events to raise a presumption, that many rules, of which nobody has hitherto discerned the. historical beginnings, had c 18 VILLAGE COMMUNITY. LECT. 7. really their sources in certain incidents of the Patria Potestas, if the Indian evidence may be trusted. And upon that evidence many threads of connec- tion between widely divided departments of law will emerge from the obscurity in which they have hitherto been hidden. But the Patriarchal Family, when occupied with those agricultural pursuits which are the exclusive employment of many millions of rnen in India, is generally found as the unit of a larger natural group, the Village Community. The Village Community is in India itself the source of a land-law which, in bulk at all events, may be not unfairly compared with the real-property law of England. This law defines the relations to one another of the various sections of the group, and of the group itself to the Government, to other village communities, and to certain persons who claim rights over it. The corre- sponding cultivating group of the Teutonic societies has undergone a transformation which forbids us to attribute to it, as a source of land-law, quite the same importance which belongs to the Indian Village Com- munity. But it is certainly possible to show that the transformation was neither so thorough as has been usually supposed, nor so utterly destructive of the features of the group in its primitive shape. fhen then the Teutonic group has been_xe=con- ucted by the help of observed Indian phenomena LECT. i. LAW OF NATURE. 19 *V process which will not be completed until both i sets of facts have been more carefully examined / than heretofore by men who are conscious of their bearing on one another it is more than likely that we may be able to correct and amplify the received theories of the origin and significance of English real- property law. Let me pass to another epoch in legal history. More than once, the jurisprudence of Western Europe has reached a stage at which the ideas which presided over the original body of rules are found to have been driven out and replaced by a wholly new group of notions, which have exercised a strong, and in some cases an exclusively controlling influence on all the subsequent modifications of the law. Such a period Avas arrived at in Roman law, when the theory of a Law of Nature substituted itself for the notions which lawyers and politicians had formed for them- selves concerning the origin and sanctions of the rules which governed the ancient city. A similar displacement of the newer legal theory took place when the Roman law, long since affected in all its parts by the doctrine of Natural Law, became, for certain purposes and within certain limits, the Canon law a source of modern law which has not yet been sufficiently explored. The more recent jurispru- dence of the West has been too extensive to have been penetrated throughout by any new theory, but c 2 20 CODIFIED BRAHMINICAL LAW. LECT. i. it will not be difficult to point out that particular departments of law have come to be explained on moral principles which originally had nothing what- ever to do with them, and that, once so explained, they have never shaken off the influence of these principles. ^This phenomenon may be shown to have occurred in India on a vast scale. The whole of the codified law of the country that is, the law con- tained in the Code of Manu, and in the treatises of the various schools of commentators who have written on that code and greatly extended it is theoretically connected together by certain definite ideas of a sacerdotal nature. But the most recent observation goes to prove that the portion of the law codified and the influence of this law are much less than was once supposed, and that large bodies of indigenous custom have grow up independently of the codified law. But on comparing the written and the unwritten law, it appears clearly that the sacerdotal notions which permeate the first have invaded it from without, and are of Brahminical origin. I shall have to advert to the curious circum- stance that the influence of these Brahminical theories upon law has been rather increased than otherwise by the British dominion. The beginning of the vast body of legal rules which, for want of a better name, we must call the feudal system, constitutes, for the West, the greatest epoch in LECT. i. FEUDAL SYSTEM. 21 its legal history. The question of its origin, difficult enough in regard to those parts of Europe conquered by barbarian invaders which were inhabited by Romanised populations, seemed to be embarrassed with much greater difficulty when it had to be solved in respect of countries like England and Germany Proper, where the population was mainly of the same blood, and practised the same usages, as the conquerors of the Empire. The school of German writers, however, among whom Yon Maurer is the most eminent, appears to me to have successfully generalised and completed the explanation given in respect of our country by English historical scholars, by showing that the primitive Teutonic proprietary system had everywhere a tendency, not produced from without, to modify itself in the direction of feudalism ; so that influences partly of administrative origin and (so far as the Continent is concerned) partly traceable to Roman law may, so to speak, have been met half- way. It will be possible to strengthen these argu- ments by pointing out that the Indian system of ! property and tenure, closely resembling that which Maurer believes to be the ancient proprietary system of the Teutonic races, has occasionally, though not universally, undergone changes which bring it into something like harmony with European feudalism. Such are a few of the topics of jurisprudence touched upon, I must warn you, so slightly as to 22 CONDITIONS OF JURIDICAL STUDY. LECT. i. give a very imperfect idea of their importance and instructiveness upon which the observed phenomena of India may be expected to throw light. I shall make no apology for calling your attention to a line of investigation which perhaps shares in the bad reputation for dulness which attaches to all things Indian. Unfortunately, among the greatest obsta- cles to the study of jurisprudence from any point of view except the purely technical, is the necessity for preliminary attention to certain subjects which are conventionally regarded as uninteresting. Every man is under a temptation to overrate the importance of the subjects which have more than others occupied his own mind, but it certainly seems to me that two kinds of knowledge are indispensable, if the study of historical and philosophical jurisprudence is to be carried very far in England, knowledge of India, and knowledge of Roman law of India, because it is the great repository of verifiable phenomena of ancient usage and ancient juridical thought of Roman law, because, viewed in the whole course of its develop- ment, it connects these ancient usages and this ancient juridical thought with the legal ideas of our own day. Roman law has not perhaps as evil a reputation as it had ten or fifteen years ago, but proof in abundance that India is regarded as su- premely uninteresting is furnished by Parliament, the press, and popular literature. Yet ignorance of LECT. i. ENGLISH IGNORANCE OF INDIA. 23 India is more discreditable to Englishmen than ignorance of Roman law, and it is at the same time more unintelligible in them. It is more discredit able , because it requires no very intimate acquaintance with contemporary foreign opinion to recognise the abiding truth of De Tocqueville's remark that the conquest and government of India are really the achievements which give England her place in the opinion of the world. They are undeniably ro- mantic achievements in the history of a people which it is the fashion abroad to consider unromantic. The ignorance is moreover unintelligible, because knowledge on the subject is extremely plentiful and extremely accessible, since English society is full of men who have made it the study of a life pursued with an ardour of public spirit which would be exceptional even in the field of British domestic politics. The explanation is not, however, I think, far to seek. Indian knowledge and experience are represented in this country by men who go to India all but in boyhood, and return from it in the matu- rity of years. The language of administration and government in India is English, but through long employment upon administrative subjects, a technical language has been created, which contains far more novel and special terms than those who use it are commonly aware. Even, therefore, if the great Indian authorities who live among us were in perfect 24 DISAPPEARANCE OF INDIAN PHENOMENA. LECT. i. mental contact with the rest of the community, they could only communicate their ideas through an imperfect medium. But it may be even doubted whether this mental contact exists. The men of whom I have spoken certainly underrate the ig- norance of India which prevails in England on elementary points. If I could suppose myself to have an auditor of Indian experience, I should make him no apology for speaking on matters which would appear to him too elementary to deserve discussion; since my conviction is that what is wanting to unveil the stores of interest contained in India is, first, some degree of sympathy with an ignorance which very few felicitous efforts have yet been made to dispel, and, next, the employment of phraseology not too highly specialised. If, however, there are reasons why the jurist should apply himself to the study of Indian usage, there are still more urgent reasons why he should apply himself at once. Here, if anywhere, what has to be done must be done quickly. For this remarkable society, pregnant with interest at every point, and for the moment easily open to our obser- vation, is undoubtedly passing away. Just as ac- cording to the Brahminical theory each of the Indian sacred rivers loses in time its sanctity, so India itself is gradually losing everything which is characteristic of it. I may illustrate the completeness of the trans- LECT. i. INFLUENCE OF WESTERN IDEAS. 25 formation which is proceeding by repeating what I have learned, on excellent authority, to be the opinion of the best native scholars : that^ in fifty years all knowledge of Sanscrit will have departed from India, or, if kept alive, will be kept alive by the reactive influence of Germany and England. Such assertions as these are not inconsistent with other statements which you are very likely to have heard from men who have passed a life in Indian administration. Native Indian society is doubtless as a whole very ignorant, very superstitious, very tenacious of usages which are not always wholesome. But no society in the world is so much at the mercy of the classes whom it regards as entitled by their intellectual or religious cultivation to dictate their opinions to others, and a contagion of ideas, spreading at a varying rate of progress, is gradually bringing these classes under the dominion of foreign modes of thought. Some of them may at present have been very slightly affected by the new influence ; but then a comparatively slight infusion of foreign idea into indigenous notions is often enough to spoil them for scientific observation. I have had unusual opportunities of studying the mental condition of the educated class in one Indian province. Though it is so strongly Europeanised as to be no fair sample of native society taken as a whole, its peculiar stock of ideas is probably the chief source from which the influences proceed which 26 INFLUENCE OF PHYSICAL SCIENCE. LF.CT. i. are more or less at work everywhere. Here there has been a complete revolution of thought, in litera- ture, in taste, in morals, and in law. I can only compare it to the passion for the literature of Greece and Rome which overtook the Western world at the revival of letters ; and yet the comparison does not altogether hold, since I must honestly admit that much which had a grandeur of its own is being re- placed by a great deal which is poor and ignoble. But one special source of the power of Western ideas in India I mention with emphasis, because it is not as often recognised as it should be, even by men of Indian experience. These ideas are making their way into the East just at the period when they are themselves strongly under the influence of physical knowledge, and of the methods of physical science. Now, not only is all Oriental thought and literature embarrassed in all its walks by a weight of false physics, which at once gives a great advantage to all competing forms of knowledge, but it has a special difficulty in retaining its old interest. It is elabo- rately inaccurate, it is supremely and deliberately careless of all precision in magnitude, number, and time. But to a very quick and subtle-minded people, which has hitherto been denied any mental food but this, mere accuracy of thought is by itself an in- tellectual luxury of the very highest order. It would be absurd to deny that the disintegration LECT. i. INFLUENCE OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE. 27 of Eastern usage and thought is attributable to British dominion. Yet one account of the matter which is very likely to find favour with some Englishmen and many foreigners is certainly not true, or only true with the largest qualifications. The interference of the British Government has rarely taken the form of high-handed repression or contemptuous discourage- ment. The dominant theory has always been that the country ought to be governed in conformity with its own notions and customs; but the interpretation of these notions and customs has given rise to the widest differences of opinion, and it is the settled habit of the partisans of each opinion to charge their adversaries with disregard of native usage. The Englishman not personally familiar with India should always be on his guard against sweeping accusations of this sort, which often amount in reality to no more than the imputation of error on an extremely vague and difficult question, and possibly a question which is nx3t__toJba. solved^J^^xclusiyely Indian experieiicje. If I were to describe the feeling which is now strongest with some of the most ener- getic Indian administrators, I should be inclined to call it a fancy for reconstructing native Indian society upon a purely native model ; a fancy which somef would apparently indulge, even to the abnegation o all moral judgment. But the undertaking is not practicable. It is by its indirect and for the most 23 INFLUENCE OF THE BE1TISH EMPIRE. LECT. i. part unintended influence that the British power metamorphoses and dissolves the ideas and social forms underneath it; nor is there any expedient by which it can escape the duty of rebuilding upon its own principles that which it unwillingly destroys. LECTURE II. THE SOURCES OF INDIAN LAW. CONTENTS. Indian Settlements Settlement and Revenue Courts The Civil Courts The Indian Judicial System The Supreme Courts English Law in India Indian Opinion on English Law Locality of Custom The Will of Bengal Wills and Collective Property A Modern Indian Will The Sudder Court Influence of Sudder Courts De- Telopment of Hindoo Law Effect of Juridical Commentaries The Bar and English Law Mahometan Law The Pundits Codified Hindoo Law Varieties of Native Usage The Written Law Hindoo Widow's Estate Preservation of Customary Law Caste in India Tradition Different Forms of Tradition Popular Ignorance of Law in England The Experts and English Law Indian and Teutonic Village Systems. LECT. ii. INDIAN QUASI-JUDICIAL AGENCIES. 31 LECTURE II. THE SOURCES OF INDIAN LAW. THE bodies of customary law which exist in India have now and then been more or less popularly de- scribed by acute observers who were led to examine them by curiosity or official duty; but on the whole the best information we possess concerning native usage is that which has been obtained through judicial or quasi-judicial agency. The agency which I have here called ' quasi-judicial ' belongs to a part of Anglo-Indian administration which is very little understood by Englishmen, but which is at the same time extremely interesting and instructive. Its origin and character may be described as follows inadequately no doubt, but still without substantial inaccuracy. The British Government, like all Eastern sovereigns, claims a large share of the produce of the soil, most of which, however, unlike other Eastern sovereigns, it returns to its subjects through the judicial and administrative services which it maintains, and 32 INDIAN SETTLEMENTS. LECT. 11. through the public works which it systematically executes. Some person, or class of persons, must of course be responsible to it for the due payment of this c land-revenue,' and this person or class must have the power of collecting it from the other owners and cultivators of the soil. This double necessity, of determining the persons immediately responsible for its share of the profits of cultivation and of investing them with corresponding authority, has involved the British Indian Government, ever since the very infancy of its dominion, in what I believe to be the most arduous task which a govern- o ment ever undertook. It has had not only to frame an entire law of land for a strange country, but to effect a complete register of the rights which the law confers on individuals and definite classes. When a province is first incorporated with the Empire, the first step is to effect a settlement or adjustment of the amount of rent claimable by the State. The functionaries charged with this duty are known as the Settlement Officers. They act under formal instructions from the provincial govern- ment which has deputed them ; they communicate freely with it during their enquiries ; and they wind them up with a Settlement Report, which is often a most comprehensive account of the new province, its history, its natural products, and above all the usages of its population. But the most important LECT. IT. SETTLEMENT AND REVENUE COURTS. 33 object of the Settlement operations not second even to tlie adjustment of the Government revenues is to construct a c Record of Rights/ which is a detailed register of all rights over the soil in the form in which they are believed to have existed on the eve of the conquest or annexation. Here it. is that the duties of the Settlement Officers assume something of a judicial character. The persons who complain of any proposed entry on the register may insist on a formal hearing before it is made. When the Recordj)f Rights has been completed and the amount of Government revenue has been adjusted, the functions of the Settlement Officers are at an end, and do not revive until the period is closed for which the Settlement has been made. But, during the currency of this period, questions between the State and the payer of land-tax still continue to arise in considerable number, and it is found practi- cally impossible to decide on such questions without occasionally adjudicating on private rights. Another quasi-judicial agency is therefore that of the function- aries who, individually or collectively, have jurisdic- tion in such disputes, and who are variously known as Revenue Officers, Revenue Courts, and Revenue Boards-^expressions extremely apt to mislead the Englishman unused to Indian official documents. The Circulars and Instructions issued by their superiors to Settlement and Revenue officers, their Reports and D 34 THE CIVIL COURTS. I.ECT. 11. decisions on disputed points, constitute a whole litera- ture of very great extent and variety and of the utmost value and instructiveness. I am afraid I must add that the English reader, whose attention is not called to it by official duty, not unusually finds it very unattractive or even repulsive. But the reason I believe to be that the elementary knowledge which is the key to it has for the most part never been reduced to writing at all. So far as the functions of the Settlement and Revenue Officers constitute a judicial agency, the jurisdiction exercised by them was at first estab- lished by the British Government not in its character of sovereign, but in its capacity of supreme land- owner. It was merely intended to enforce the claim of the State with some degree of regularity and caution. The strictly judicial agency of which I spoke is that of the Civil Courts, which are very much what we understand in this country by ordi- nary Courts of Justice. Theoretically, whenever the Settlement or Revenue Courts decide a question of private right, there is almost always (I need not state the exceptions) an appeal from their decision to the Civil Courts. Yet, taking India as a whole, these appeals are surprisingly few in comparison with the cases decided. This is one of the reasons why the literature of Settlement and Revenue opera- tions is a fuller source of information concerning the LECT. ii. THE INDIAN JUDICIAL SYSTEM. 35 customs of ownership and tenure observed among the natives of India than the recorded decisions of the Civil Courts. Yet, though the results of quasi-judicial agency in India are, on the whole, more instructive than the results of strictly judicial agency, the Indian Civil Courts have nevertheless been largely instrumental in bringing into light the juridical notions peculiar to the country, in contrasting them with the legal ideas of the Western World, and to a certain extent in subjecting them to a process of transmutation. For reasons which will appear as I proceed, it is desirable that I should give you some account of these courts. I will endeavour to do it briefly and only in outline. All India at the present moment, with the excep- tion of the most unsettled provinces, is under the jurisdiction of five High or Chief Courts. The dif- ference between a High and Chief Court is merely technical, one being established by the Queen's Letters Patent, under an Act of Parliament, the other by an enactment of the Indian Legislature. Of these courts, three are considerably older than the rest, and are in fact almost as old as the British dominion in India. When, however, the texture of the jurisdiction of the High Courts which sit at Calcutta, Madras, and Bombay, is examined, it is seen to consist of two parts, having a different D2 36 THE SUPREME COURTS. LECT. n. history. An Indian lawyer expresses this by saying that the three older High Courts were formed by the fusion of the 4 Supreme ' and c Sudder ' Courts, words which have the same meaning but which indicate very different tribunals. The Supreme Courts, invested with special judicial powers over a limited territory attached to the three old fortified factories of the East India Company at Calcutta, Madras, and Bombay or, as they were once called, and are still called officially, Fort William, Fort St. George, and Bombay Castle may be shortly described as three offshoots from Westminster Hall planted in India. They were ' Courts of Eecord, exercising Civil, Criminal, Admiralty, and Ecclesiasti- cal jurisdiction,' and their judges were barristers taken straight from the English Bar. Although a series of statutes and charters provided securities for the application of native law and usage to the cases of their native suitors, and though some of the best treatises on Hindoo law which we possess were written by Supreme Court judges, it would not be incorrect to say that on the eve of the enactment of the several Indian Codes, the bulk of the jurispru- dence administered by the Supreme Courts consisted of English law, administered under English pro- cedure. Lord Macaulay, in the famous essay on Warren Hastings, has vividly described the conster- nation which the most important of these courts LECT. ii. ENOLISII LAW IN INDIA. 37 caused in its early days among the natives subject to its power ; and there is no doubt that the establish- ment of a tribunal on similar principles would now- a-days be regarded as a measure of the utmost injustice and danger. Yet there is something to be said in mitigation of the condemnation which the Supreme Courts have received everywhere except in India. The great quantity of English law which had worked its way into their jurisprudence is doubtless" to be partially accounted for by the extravagant estimate universally set by English lawyers upon their own system, until their complacency was rudely disturbed by Bentham; but at the same time the apparently inevitable displacement of native law and usage by English law, when the two sets of rules are in contact, is a phenomenon which may be observed over a great part of India at the present moment. The truth is that the written and customary law of such a society as the English found in India is not of a nature to bear the strict criteria applied by English lawyers. The rule is so vague as to seem capable of almost any interpretation, and the construction which in those days an English lawyer would place on it, would almost certainly be coloured by associa- tions collected from English practice. The strong statements, too, which have been made concerning the unpopularity of these courts on their first establishment must be received with some caution. 38 INDIAN OPINION ON ENGLISH LAW. LECT. n Unquestionably great and general dismay was caused by their civil procedure, conferring as it did powers of compelling the attendance of witnesses, and of arresting defendants both before and after judgment, which were quite foreign to the ideas of the country. There were constant complaints, too, of the applica- tion of the English law of forgery to India. It is true that, as regards the case which Lord Macaulay has sketched with such dramatic force, Nuncomar appears to me, upon the records of the proceedings, to have had quite as fair a trial as any Englishman of that day indicted for forgery would have had in England, and to have been treated with even more consideration by the Court. But the introduction of the law under which he suffered was felt as a general grievance, and there are many representations on the subject in the archives of the Indian Government. These archives, however, which have been recently examined, and in part published, seem to me to prove that the native citizens of Calcutta, so far from com- plaining of the civil law imported by the Supreme Court from Westminster Hall and of the bulk of the criminal law, actually learned to echo the complacent encomiums on its perfection which they heard from English Judges. The fact appears to me so well established that I venture to draw some inferences from it. One is of a political nature, and need not be dwelt on here. A nervous fear of altering native LECT. ii. LOCALITY OF CUSTOM. 39 custom lias, ever since the terrible events of 1857, taken possession of Indian administrators; but the truth is the natives of India are not so wedded to their usages that they are not ready to surrender them for any tangible advantage, and in this case the even justice of these courts was evidently re- garded as quite making up for the strangeness of the principles upon which they acted. Another con- clusion is of more direct importance to the jurist. Complete and consistent in appearance as is the codified law of India, the law enunciated by Manu and by the Brahminical commentators on him, it embraces a far smaller portion of the whole law of India than was once supposed, and penetrates far less deeply among the people. What an Oriental is really attached to is his local custom, but that was felt to have been renounced by persons taking refuge at a distance from home, under the shelter of the British fortresses. The chief interest of these Supreme Courts to the student of comparative jurisprudence arises from the powerful indirect influence exerted by them on the other courts which I mentioned, and with which eight years ago they were combined the Sudder Courts. Nevertheless, some of the questions which have incidentally come before the Supreme Courts, or before the branch of the High Court which con- tinues their jurisdiction, have thrown a good deal of 40 THE WILL OF BENGAL. LBCT. n. light on the mutual pky of Eastern and Western legal thought in the British Indian Empire. The judges who presided over the most important of these courts very early recognised the existence of testamentary power among the Hindoos, It seems that, in the province of Lower Bengal, where the village -system had been greatly broken up, the head of the household had the power of disposing of his patrimony during life. Whether he could dispose of it at death, and thus execute a disposition in any way resembling a will, has always been a much disputed question which, however, contemporary opinion rather inclines towards answering in the negative. However that may be, the power of making a will was soon firmly established among the Hindoos of Lower Bengal by, or through the influence of, the English lawyers who first entered the country. For a long time these wills, never very frequently used, were employed, as the testaments of Roman citizens can be shown to have been employed, merely to supplement the arrangements which, without them, would have been made by the law of intestate succession. But the native lawyers who practise in Calcutta live in an atmosphere strongly charged with English law, and wills drafted by them or at their instance, and exactly resembling the will of a great English landed proprietor, were coming in increasing numbers before the Courts, up to the time when the LECT. IT. WILLS AXD COLLECTIVE PROPERTY. 41 law ot testamentary succession was finally simplified and settled by a recent enactment of the Indian Legislature. In such wills the testator claimed to arrange a line of succession entirely for himself, not only providing for the enjoyment of the property by his descendants in such order as he pleased, but even excluding them, if he liked, altogether from the succession; and, in order to obtain his object, he also necessarily claimed to have the benefit of a number of fictions or artificial notions, which made their way into English law from feudal and even from scho- lastic sources. The most interesting of these wills was executed by a Brahmin of high lineage who made a fortune at the Calcutta Bar, and he aimed at disinheriting or excluding from the main line of succession a son who had embraced Christianity. The validity and effect of the instrument have yet to be declared by the Privy Council; and all I can say without impropriety is that, in those parts of India in which the collective holding of property has not decayed as much as it has done in Lower Bengal, the liberty of testation claimed would clearly be foreign to the indigenous system of the country. That system is one of common enjoyment by village-", communities, and, inside those communities, by/ families. The individual here has almost no power j of disposing of his property ; even if he be chief of his household, the utmost he can do, as a rule, is to 42 A MODERN INDIAN WILL. LECT. n. regulate the disposition of his property among his children within certain very narrow limits. But the power of free testamentary disposition implies the greatest latitude ever given in the history of the world to the volition or caprice of the individual. Independently, however, of all questions of substance, nothing could be more remarkable than the form of the will which I spoke of as having fallen under the jurisdiction of the tribunal which now represents the Supreme Court of Calcutta. Side by side by recitals, apparently intended to conceal the breach in the line of descent, by affirming that the tes- tator had, while living, made suitable provision for the disinherited son, were clauses settling certain property in perpetuity on the idols of the family, and possibly meant to propitiate them for the irregu- larity in the performance of the sacra which the new devolution of the inheritance inevitably entailed. The testator formally stated that he and his brothers had failed in business, that all the property they had inherited had been lost in the disaster, and that the fortune of which he was disposing was acquired by his individual exertions. This was meant to take the funds with which the will dealt out of the Hindoo family system and to rebut the presumption that the gains of a brother belonged to the common stock of the joint family. But these provisions referring to Hindoo joint property were followed by others LECT. ii. THE SUDDER COURT. 43 creating joint estates on the English model ; and here the testator employed legal terms only capable of being thoroughly understood by a person familiar with that extraordinary technical dialect expressing the incidents of joint-tenancy which the fathers of English law may be seriously suspected of having borrowed from the Divinity Schools of Oxford and Cambridge. The other court which has been recently com- bined with the court I have been describing, re- tained to the last its native name of Sudder Court. It underwent some changes after its first establish- ment, but it may be roughly said to date from the assumption by the English of territorial sovereignty. When finally organised, it became thejiighest courtjof appellate jurisdiction from all the courts established in the territories dependent on the seat of govern- ment, saving always the Supreme Court, which had exclusive jurisdiction within the Presidency Town, or (as it might be called) the English metropolis. The nature of the local tribunals from which an appeal lay to the Sudder Court is a study by itself; and I must content myself with stating that the Indian judicial system at present resembles not the English but the French system; that a number of local courts are spread over the country, from each of which an appeal lies to some higher court, of which the decisions are again appealable to the court, 44 INFLUENCE OF SUDDER COURTS. LECT. n. whether called Sudder or High Court, which stands at the apex. The Sudder Courts therefore decided in the last resort questions arising originally at some point or other of a vast territory, a territory in some cases containing a population equal to that of the largest European States. Except the Indian Settlement and Revenue Courts which I began this Lecture by describing, no tribunal in the world has ever had to consider a greater variety of law and usage. What that law and usage was, the Sudder Court used to ascertain with what some would call most conscientious accuracy and others the most technical narrowness. The judges of the Court were not lawyers, but the most learned civilians in the service of the East India Company, some of whom have left names dear to Oriental learning. They were strongly influenced by the Supreme Court which sat in their neighbourhood; but it is curious to watch the dif- ferent effect which the methods of English law had on the two tribunals. At the touch of the Judge of the Supreme Court, who had been trained in the English school of special pleading, and had probably come to the East in the maturity of life, the rule of native law dissolved and, with or without his inten- tion, was to a great extent replaced by rules having their origin in English law-books. Under the hand of the Judges of the Sudder Courts, who had lived since their boyhood among the people of the country, LECT. ii. INFLUENCE OF SUDDER COURTS. 45 the native rules hardened, and contracted a rigidity which they never had in real native practice. The process was partly owing to their procedure, which they seem to have borrowed from the procedure of the English ourt of Chancery, at that time a proverb at once of complexity and technical strictness. It has been said by an eminent Indian lawyer that, when the Judges of the S udder Courts were first set to administer native law, they appear to have felt as if they had got into fairyland, so strange and grotesque were the legal prin- ciples on which they were called to act. But after a while they became accustomed to the new region, and began to behave themselves as if all were real and substantial. As a matter of fact, they acted as if they believed in it more than did its native inhabi- tants. Among the older records of their proceedings may be found injunctions, couched in the technical language of English Chancery pleadings, which for- bid the priests of a particular temple to injure a rival fane by painting the face of their idol red instead of yellow, and decrees allowing the complaint of other priests that they were injured in property and repute because their neighbours rang a bell at a particular moment of their services. Much Brahminical ritual and not a little doctrine became the subject of de- cision. The Privy Council in London was once called upon to decide in ultimate appeal on the claims of rival hierophants to have their palanquin carried 46 DEVELOPMENT OF HINDOO LAW. LECT. n. cross -wise instead of length- wise ; and it is said that on another occasion the right to drive elephants through the narrow and crowded streets of one of the most sacred Indian cities, which was alleged to vest in a certain religious order as being in possession of a particular idol, was seriously disputed because the idol was cracked. There is in truth but little doubt that, until educa- tion began to cause the natives of India to absorb Western ideas for themselves, the influence of the English rather retarded than hastened the mental development of the race. There are several depart- ments of thought in which a slow modification of primitive notions and consequent alteration of prac- tice may be seen to have been proceeding before we entered the country ; but the signs of such change are exceptionally clear in jurisprudence, so far, that is to say, as Hindoo jurisprudence has been codified. Hindoo law is theoretically contained in Manu, but it is practically collected from the writings of the jurists who have commented on him and on one another. I need scarcely say that the mode of de- veloping law which consists in the successive com- ments of jurisconsult upon jurisconsult, has played a very important part in legal history. The middle and later Koman law owes to it much more than to the imperial constitutions ; a great part of the Canon law has been created by it ; and, though it has been LECT. ii. EFFECT OF JUDICIAL COMMENTARIES. 47 a good deal checked of late years by the increased activity of formal legislatures, it is still the principal agency in extending and modifying the law of con- tinental countries. It is worth observing that it is on the whole a liberalising process. Even so obsti- nate a subject-matter as Hindoo law, was visibly changed by it for the better. No doubt the dominant object of each successive Hindoo commentator is so to construe each rule of civil law as to make it appear that there is some sacerdotal reason for it; but, subject to this controlling aim, each of them leaves in the law after he has explained it, a stronger dose of common sense and a larger element of equity and reasonableness than he found in it as it came from the hands of his predecessors. The methods of interpretation which the Sudder Courts borrowed from the Supreme Courts and which the Supreme Courts imported from Westminster Hall, put a stop to any natural growth and improvement of Hindoo law. As students of historical jurispudence, we may be grateful to them for it ; but I am clearly persuaded that, except where the Indian Legislature directly interfered and of late it has interfered rather freely, the English dominion of India at first placed the natives of the country under a less ad- vanced regimen of civil law than they would have had if they had been left to themselves. The pheno- menon seems to me one of considerable interest to the 48 THE BAR AND ENGLISH LAW. LECT. n. jurist. Why is it that the English mode of develop- ing law by decided cases tends less to improve and liberalise it than the interpretation of written law by successive commentators ? Of the fact there seems no question. Even where the original written law is historically as near to us as are the French Codes, its development by text-writers is on the whole more rapid than that of English law by decided cases. The absence of any distinct check on the commen- tator and the natural limitations on the precision of language are among the causes of the liberty he enjoys; so also is the power which he exercises of dealing continuously with a whole branch of law; and so too are the facilities for taking his own course afforded him by inconsistencies between the dicta of his predecessors inconsistencies which are so glaring in the case of the Hindoo lawyers, that they were long ago distributed into separate schools of juridical doctrine. The reason why a Bench of Judges, ap- plying a set of principles and distinctions which are still to a great extent at large, should be as slow as English experience shows them to be in extension and innovation, is not at first sight apparent. But- doubtless the secret lies in the control of the English Bench by professional opinion a control exerted all the more stringently when the questions brought before the courts are merely insulated fragments of particular branches of law. English law is, in fact, LECT. ii. MAHOMETAN LAW. 49 confided to the custody of a great corporation, of which the Bar, not the Judges, are far the largest and most influential part. The majority of the cor- porators watch over every single change in the body of principle deposited with them, and rebuke and practically disallow it, unless the departure from precedent is so slight as to be almost imperceptible. Let us now consider what was the law which, under the name of native custom, the courts which I have been describing undertook to administer. I shall at present attend exclusively to the system which, as being the law of the enormous majority of the population, has a claim to be deemed the common- law of the country Hindoo law. If I were techni- cally describing the jurisdiction, I should have to include Mahometan law, and the very interesting customs of certain races who have stood apart from the main currents of Oriental conquest and civili- sation, and are neither Mahometan nor Hindoo. Mahometan law, theoretically founded on the Koran, has really more interest for the jurist than has sometimes been supposed, for it has absorbed a number of foreign elements, which have been amal- gamated by a very curious process with the mass o semi-religious rules ;, but the consideration of this may conveniently be postponed, as also the discussion of the outlying bodies of non-Hindoo usage found in various parts of the country. E 50 THE PUNDITS. LECT. n. The Hindoo law, then, to which the English in India first substantially confined their attention, con- sisted, first, of the Institutes of Manu, pretending to a divine inspiration, of which it is not easy to define the degree and quality, and, next, of the catena of commentators belonging to the juridical sohool ad- mitted to prevail in the province for which each par- ticular court was established. The Court did not in early times pretend to ascertain the law for itself, but took the opinion of certain native lawyers officially attached to the tribunal. But from the first there were some specially learned Englishmen on the bench who preferred to go for themselves to the fountains of law, and the practice of consulting the ' Pundits ' was gradually discontinued. These Pundits laboured long under the suspicion, to a great degree unmerited, of having trafficked with their privilege, and having often, from corrupt motives, coined the law which they uttered as genuine. But the learned work of Mr. West and Professor Biihler, following on other enquiries, has gone far to exonerate them, as the greater part of their more important opinions have been traced to their source in recognised authorities. That they were never corrupt it is unfortunately never safe to affirm of Orientals of their time; but their opportunity was probably taken from the vagueness of the texts which they had to interpret. There are in fact certain dicta of Hindoo authorita- LECT. IT. CODIFIED HINDOO LAW. (5} tive commentators upon which almost any conclusion could be based. The codified or written law of the Hindoos, then assumed to include their whole law, consisted of a large body of law regulating the relations of classes,, especially in the matter of intermarriage ; of a great ) body of family law, and a correspondingly extensive j law of succession ; and of a vast number of rules regulating the tenure of property by joint families, the effects on proprietary right of the division of those families, and the power of holding property independently of the family. There was some law of Contract and some law of Crime ; but large departments of law were scantily represented, or not at all, and there was in particular a singular scarcity of rules relating specially to the tenure of| land, and to the mutual rights of the various classes f engaged in its cultivation. This last peculiarity was*' all the more striking because the real wealth of the country is, and always has been, agricultural, and the religious and social customs of the people, even as recorded in the codified law, savour strongly of agriculture as their principal occupation. It would seem that doubts as to the relation of the codified or written law to the totality of native usage were entertained at a very early time, and collections were made of local rules which applied to the very points discussed by the Brahminical jurists, E 2 52 VARIETIES OF NATIVE USAGE. T.ECT. n. and yet disposed of them in a very different manner. These doubts have steadily gained strength. I think I may venture to lay down generally, that the more exclusively an Anglo-Indian functionary has been employed in c revenue ' administration, and the further removed from great cities has been the scene of his labours, the greater is his hesitation in admit- ting that the law assumed to begin with Manu is, or ever has been, of universal application. I have also some reason to believe that the Judges of the newest of the High Courts, that established a few years ago for the provinces of the North- West in which I primitive usage was from the first most carefully / observed and most respected, are of opinion that they 'would do great injustice if they strictly and uniformly administered the formal written law. The conclusion arrived at by the persons who seem to me of highest authority is, first, that the codified law Manu and his glossators embraced originally a much smaller body of usage than had been imagined, and, next, that the customary rules, reduced to writing, have been very greatly altered by Brahminical expositors, constantly in spirit, sometimes in tenor. Indian law may be in fact affirmed to consist of a very great number of local bodies of usage, and of one set of customs, reduced to writing, pretending to a diviner authority than the rest, exercising consequently a great influence over them, and tending, if not checked, LECT. ii. THE WRITTEN LAW. 53 to absorb them. You must not understand that these bodies of custom are fundamentally distinct. They are all marked by the same general features, but there are considerable differences of detail; and the interest of these differences to the historical jurist is very great, for it is by their help that he is able chien^to^conjnjBt_the customs of India with what appear to have been some of the oldest customs of Europe and the West. As you would expect, the written law, having been exclusively set forth and explained by Brahmins, is principally distinguished from analogous local usages by additions and omissions for which sacer- dotal reasons may be assigned. For instance, I have been assured from many quarters that one sweeping theory, which dominates the whole codified law, can barely be traced in the unwritten customs. It sounds like a jest to say that, according to the principles of Hindoo law, property is regarded as the means of paying a man's funeral expenses, but this is not so very untrue of the written law, concerning which the most dignified of the Indian Courts has recently laid down, after an elaborate examination of all tEer authorities, that c the right of inheritance, according to Hindoo law, is wholly regulated with reference to the spiritual benefits to be conferred on the deceased proprietor.' There are also some remarkable dif- ferences between the written and unwritten law in 54 HINDOO WIDOWS ESTATE. LECT. n. their construction of the rights of widows. That the oppressive disabilities of widows found in mo- dern Hindoo law, and especially the prohibition of re-marriage, have no authority from ancient records, has often been noticed. The re -marriage of widows is not a subject on which unwritten usage can be ex- pected to throw much light, for the Brahminical law has generally prevailed in respect of personal family relations, but the unwritten law of property, which largely differs from the written law, undoubtedly gives colour to the notion that the extraordinary harshness of the Hindoo text-writer to widows is of sacerdotal origin. A custom, of which there are many traces in the ancient law of the Aryan races, but which is not by any means confined to them, gives under various conditions the government of the family, and, as a consequence of government, the control of its property, to the wife after the death of her husband, sometimes during the minority of her male children, sometimes for her own life upon failure of direct male descendants, sometimes even, in this last contingency, absolutely. But the same feeling, gradually increasing in strength, which led them in their priestly capacity to preach to the widow the duty of self ^immolation at her husband's funeral-pyre, appears to have made her proprietary rights more and more distasteful to the Brahminical text- writers; and the Hindoo jurists of all schools, LECT. ii. PRESERVATION OF CUSTOMARY LAW. 55 though of some more than others, have striven hard to maintain the principle that the life of the widow is properly a life of self-denial and humilia- tion. Partly by calling in the distinction between separate and undivided property, and partly by help of the distinction between movable and immovable property, they have greatly cut down the widow's rights, not only reducing them for the most part (where they arise) to a life-interest, but abridging this interest by a variety of restrictions to little more than a trusteeship. Here again I am assured that any practice corresponding to this doctrine is very rarely found in the unwritten usage, under which not only does the widow tend to become a true pro- prietress for life, but approaches here and there to the condition of an absolute owner. The preservation, during a number of centuries which it would be vain to calculate, of this great body of unwritten custom, differing locally in detail, but connected by common general features, is a pheno- menon which the jurist must not pass over. Before I say anything of the conclusions at which it points, let me tell you what is known of the agencies by which it has been preserved. The question has by no means been fully investigated, but many of those best entitled to have an opinion upon it have in- formed me that one great instrumentality is the perpetual discussion of customary law by the people 56 CASTE IN INDIA. LECT. n. themselves. We are, perhaps, too apt to forget that in all stages of social development men are compara- tively intelligent beings, who must have some sub- jects of mental interest. The natives of India, for poor and ignorant men, have more than might be expected of intellectual quickness, and the necessities of the climate and the simplicity of their habits make the calls on their time less, and their leisure greater, than would be supposed by persons acquainted only with the labourers of colder climates. Those who know most of them assert that their religious belief is kept alive not by direct teaching, but by the con- stant recitation in the vernacular of parts of their sacred poems, and that the rest of their thought and conversation is given to their usages. But this, doubt- less, is not the whole explanation. I have been asked, and I acknowledge the force of the question how traditions of immemorial custom could be preserved by the agricultural labourers of England, even if they had more leisure than they have? But the answer is that the social constitution of India is of the extreme ancient, that of England of the extreme modern type. I am aware that the popular im- pression here is that Indian society is divided, so to speak, into a number of horizontal strata, each re- presenting a caste. This is an_entire mistake. It is extremely doubtful whether the Brahminical theory of caste upon caste was ever true except of the two LECT. ii. TRADITION. 57 highest castes ; and it is even likely that more impor- tance has been attached to it in modern than ever was in ancient times. The real India contains one priestly caste, which in a certain, though a very limited, sense is the highest of all, and there are, besides, some princely houses and a certain number of tribes, village communities, and guilds, which still in our day advance a claim, considered by many good authorities extremely doubtful, to belong to the second or third of the castes recognised by the Brahminical writers. But otherwise, caste is merely a name for trade or occupation, and the sole tangible effect of the Brahminical theory is that it creates a religious sanction for what is really a primitive and natural distribution of classes. The true view of India is that, as a whole, it is divided into a vast number of independent, self-acting, organised social groups trading, manufacturing, cultivating. The English agricultural labourers of whom we spoke, are a too large, too indeterminate class, of which the units are too loosely connected, and have too few interests in common, to have any great power of retaining tradition. But the smaller organic groups of Indian society are very differently situated. They are constantly dwelling on traditions of a cer- tain sort, they are so constituted that one man's interests and impressions correct those of another, and some of them have in their council of elders a 58 DIFFERENT FORMS OF TRADITION. LECT. n. permanent machinery for declaring traditional usage, and solving doubtful points. Tradition, I may ob- serve, has been the subject of so much bitter polemi- "cal? controversy that a whole group of most in- teresting and important questions connected with it have never been approached in the proper spirit, Under what conditions it is accurate, and in respect of what class of matters is accurate, are points with which the historical jurist is intimately concerned. I do not pretend to sum up the whole of the lessons which observation of Indian society teaches on the subject, but it is assuredly the belief of men who were at once conscientious observers and had no antecedent theory to sway them, that naturally organised groups of men are obstinate conservators of traditional law, but that the accuracy of the tradition diminishes as the group becomes larger and wider. I The knowledge that this great body of traditional I law existed, and that its varieties were just suffi- ciently great for the traditions of one group to throw light on those of another, will hereafter deeply affect the British administration of India. But I shall have to point out to you that there are signs of its being somewhat abused. There has been a tendency to leave out of sight the distinctions which render different kinds of tradition of very different value; the distinction, for example, between a mere tradition LECT. ii. POPULAR IGNORANCE OF LAW IN ENGLAND. 59 as to the rule to be followed in a given case and a LS tradition which has caused a rule to be followed; the distinction, as it has been put, between customs which do and customs which do not correspond to practices. If a tradition is not kept steady by corresponding practice, it may be warped by all sorts of extraneous influences. The great value now justly attached in India to traditional law has even brought about the absurdity of asking it to solve some of the most complicated problems of modern society, problems produced by the collapse of the very social system which is assumed to have in itself their secret. I have been conducted by this discussion to a topic on which a few words may not be thrown away. Not only in connection with the preservation of customary law, but as a means of clearing the mind before addressing oneself to a considerable number of juridical questions, I must ask you to believe that the very small place filled by our own English law in our thoughts and conversation is a phenomenon absolutely confined to these islands. A very simple experiment, a very few questions asked after crossing the Channel, will convince you that Frenchmen, Swiss, and Germans of a very humble order have a fair practical knowledge of the law which regulates their everyday life. We in Great Britain and Ireland are altogether singular in our 60 THE EXPERTS AND ENGLISH LAW. LECT. n. tacit conviction that law belongs as much to the class of exclusively professional subjects as the practice of anatomy. Ours is, in fact, under limita- tions which it is not necessary now to specify, a body of traditional customary law; no law is better known by those who live under it in a certain stage of social progress, none is known so little by those who are in another stage. As social activity multi- plies the questions requiring judicial solution, the method of solving them which a system of customary law is forced to follow is of such a nature as to add enormously to its bulk. Such a system in the end beats all but the experts ; and we, accordingly, have turned our laws over to experts, to attorneys and solicitors, to barristers above them, and to judges in the last resort. There is but one remedy for this the reduction of the law to continuous writing and its inclusion within aptly -framed general propositions. The facilitation of this process is the practical end of scientific jurisprudence. As in the lectures which follow I shall not often appeal to what are ordinarily recognised as the foun- tains of Hindoo law, it was necessary for me to explain that the materials for the conclusions which I shall state unwritten usages, probably older and purer than the Brahminical written law are now having their authority acknowledged even by the Indian Courts, once the jealous conservators of the LECT. ii. INDIAN AND TEUTONIC VILLAGE SYSTEMS. 61 integrity of the sacerdotal system. These ma- terials are partly to be found in that large and miscellaneous official literature which I described as having grown out of the labours of the functionaries who adjust the share of the profits of cultivation claimed by the British Government as supreme land- lord; but much which is essential to a clear under- standing can only be at present collected from the oral conversation of experienced observers who have passed their maturity in administrative office. The inferences suggested by the written and oral testi- mony would perhaps have had interest for few except those who had passed, or intended to pass, a life in Indian office; but their unexpected and (if I may speak of the impression on myself) their most start- ling coincidence wit1?^ne A w^iters who have recently applied themselves to the study of early Teutonic agricultural customs, gives them a wholly new value and importance. It would seem that light is pouring from many quarters at once on some of the darkest passages in the history of law and of society. To those who knew how strong a presumption already existed that individual property came into existence after a slow process of change, by which it disengaged itself from collective holdings by families or larger assemblages, the evidence of a primitive village system in the Teutonic and Scandinavian countries had very great interest; this interest largely increased when 62 INDIAN AND TEUTONIC VILLAGE SYSTEMS. LECT. 11. England, long supposed to have had since the Norman Conquest an exceptional system of property in land, was shown to exhibit almost as many traces of joint-ownership and common cultivation as the countries of the North of the Continent ; but our interest culminates, I think, when we find that these primitive European tenures and this primitive Euro- pean tillage constitute the actual working system of the Indian village communities, and that they deter- mine the whole course of Anglo -Indian administration. LECTURE III. THE WESTERN TILLAGE COMMUNITY. CONTENTS. Antiquity of Indian Customary Law Traditional Law Analysis of a Law Indian Conceptions of Law English Influence on Legal Con- ceptions Unwilling Assumption of Sovereignty Influence of Courts of Justice Change in Nature of Usage Growth of Conception of Right Influence of English Law Connection of Eastern and Western Custom Von Maurer The Teutonic Village Community The Arable Mark English Theories of Land-Law The Arable Mark in England Shifting Severalties The Common Fields Their Great Extent Extract from Marshall Scott on Udal Tenures Commonty of Lauder Peculiarities of Scottish Example Vestiges of the Mark. LECT. in. ANTIQUITY OF CUSTOMARY LAW. 65 LECTURE III. THE WESTERN VILLAGE COMMUNITY. I HAVE AFFIRMED the fact to be established as well as any fact of the kind can be, that there exist in India several and it may even be said, many considerable bodies of customary law, sufficiently alike to raise a strong presumption that they either had a common origin or sprang from a common social necessity, but sufficiently unlike to show that each of them must have followed its own course of development. There exists a series of writings which pretend to be a statement of these customs, but this series proves to include a part only of the whole body of usage ; it probably embodied from the first only one set of cus- tomary rules, and its form shows clearly that it must have had a separate and very distinct history of its own. Few assertions respecting lapse of time and the past can safely be made of anything Indian ; but there can be no reasonable doubt that all this cus- tomary law is of very great antiquity. I need scarcely point out to you that such facts as these have a F G6 TRADITIONAL LAW. LECT. in. bearing on more than one historical problem. If, for example, I am asked whether it is possible that, when the Eoman empire had been overrun by the Northern races, the Roman law could be preserved by mere oral transmission in countries in which no (Breviaries, of that law were published by the invading chiefs to keep it alive, I can only say that observation of India shows such preservation to be abstractedly pos- sible ; and shows it moreover to be possible in the face of written records of a legal or legislative character which contain no reference to the unwritten and orally transmitted rules. But I should at the same time have to point out that nothing in India tends to prove that law may be orally handed down from one generation to another of men who form an indeter- minate class, or that it can be preserved by any agency than that of organised, self-acting, social groups. I should further have to observe that, unless there have been habits and practices corresponding to the traditional rules, those rules may be suspected of having undergone considerable modification or depravation. I pass, however, to matters which have a closer interest for the jurist, and which are, therefore, dis- cussed with more propriety in this department of study. So long as that remarkable analysis of legal conceptions effected by Bentham and Austin is not very widely known in this country (and I see no signs i J.ECT. in. THE ANALYSIS OF A LAW. 67 of its being known on the Continent at all), it is perhaps premature -to complain of certain errors into which it is apt to lead us on points of historical juris- prudence. If, then, I employ the Indian legal pheno- mena to illustrate these errors, I must preface what I have to say with the broad assertion that nobody who has not mastered the elementary part of that analysis can hope to have clear ideas either of law or of jurisprudence. Some of you may be in a position to call to mind the mode in which these English jurists decompose the conception of a law, and the nature and order of the derivative conceptions which they assert to be associated with the general conception. A law, they say, is a command of a particular kind. It is addressed by political superiors or sovereigns to political inferiors or subjects ; it imposes on those subjects an obligation or duty and threatens a penalty (or sanction) in the event of disobedience. The power vested in particular members of the community of drawing down the sanction on neglects or breaches of the duty is called a Right. Now, without the most violent forcing of language, it is impossible to apply these terms, command, sovereign, obligation, sanction, right, to the customary law under which the Indian village communities have lived for centuries, practi- cally knowing no other law civilly obligatory. It would be altogether inappropriate to speak of a poli- tical superior commanding a particular course of action F 2 68 INDIAN CONCEPTIONS OF A LAW. J.ECT. in. to the villagers. The council of village elders does not command anything, it merely declares what has always been. Nor does it generally declare that which it believes some higher power to have com- manded; those most entitled to speak on the subject deny that the natives of India necessarily require divine or political authority as the basis of their usages ; their antiquity is by itself assumed to be a sufficient reason for obeying them. Nprj in the sense of the analytical jurists is there right or duty in /an Indian village community ; a person aggrieved f complains not of an individual wrong but of the dis- \ turbance of the order of the entire little society. More than all, customary law is not enforced by a sanction. In the almost inconceivable case of disobedience to the award of the village council, thejtole punishment, or, the sole certain punishment, would appear to be universal disapprobation. And hence, under the system of Bentham and Austin, the customary law of India would have to be called morality an inversion of language which scarcely requires to be formally protested against. I shall have hereafter to tell you that in certain of the Indian communities there are signs of one family enjoying an hereditary pre-eminence over the others, so that its head approaches in some degree to the position of chief of a clan, and I shall have to explain that this inherited authority is sometimes partially LECT. in. ENGLISH INFLUENCE ON LEGAL CONCEPTIONS. G9 ) and sometimes'exclusively judicial, so that the chief be- *) comes a sort of hereditorjj udge. Of communities thus circumstanced the juristical analysis to which I have been referring is more nearly true. So too the codi^. fied Brahminical law could be much more easily resolved into the legal conceptions determined by Bentham and Austin. It assumes that there is a king to enforce the rules which it sets forth, and pro- vides a procedure for him and his subordinates, and penalties for them to inflict ; and moreover it becomes true law in the juristical sense, through another peculiarity which distinguishes it. Every offence against this written law is also a sin ; to injure a man's property is for instance to dimmish the power of his sons to provide properly for expiatory funeral rites, and such an injury is naturally supposed to entail divine punishment on its perpetrator. We may, however, confine our attention to the unwritten usages declared from time to time by the council of village elders. The fact which has greatest interest for the jurist is one which has been established by the British dominion of India, and which could not probably have been established without it. It may be described in this way. Whenever you introduce any one of the legal concep- tions determined by the* analysis of Bentham and Austin, you introduce all the others by a process which is apparently inevitable. No better proof 70 UNWILLING ASSUMPTION OF SOVEREIGNTY. LECT. in. could be given that, though it be improper to employ these terms sovereign, subject, command, obligation, right, sanction, of law in certain stages of human thought, they nevertheless correspond to a stage to which law is steadily tending and which it is sure ultimately to reach. , Nothing is more certain than that the revolution of legal ideas which the English have effected in \ India was not effected by them intentionally. The relation of sovereign to subject, for instance, which is essential to the modern juridical conception of law, was not only not established by them, but was for long sedulously evaded. When they first committed themselves to a course of territorial aggrandisement, they adopted a number of curious fictions rather than admit that they stood to the people of India as political superior to political inferior. Nor had they the slightest design of altering the customary law of the country. They have been accused of interfer- ing with native usages, but when the interference (which has been on the whole very small) has taken place, it has either arisen from ignorance of the exist- ence of custom or has been forced on them, in very recent times and in the shape of express legislation, by necessities which I may be led hereafter to explain. 1 The English never therefore intended that 1 I have endeavoured to redeem this promise in part by printing in an Appendix a Minute recorded in India on the subject of the over-legislation not infrequently attributed to the British Govern- ment. LECT. Ill, INFLUENCE OF COURTS OF JUSTICE. G the laws of the country should rest on their com- mands, or that these laws should shift in any way their ancient basis of immemorial usage. One change only they made, without much idea of its importance, and thinking it probably the very minimum of conces- sion to the exigencies of civilised government. They established Courts of Justice in every administrative district. Here I may observe that, though the Brahminical written law assumes the existence of king and judge, yet at the present moment in some of the best governed semi-independent native States there are no institutions corresponding to our Courts \ of Justice. Disputes of a civil nature are adjusted j by the elders of each village community, or occasion- M ally, when they relate to land, by the functionaries charged with the collection of the prince's revenue. Such criminal jurisdiction as is found consists in the interposition of the military power to punish breaches of the peace of more than ordinary gravity. , What must be called criminal law is administered through the arm of the soldier. In a former lecture I spoke of the stiffness given to native custom through the influence of English law and English lawyers on the highest courts of appeal. The changes which I am about to describe arose from the mere establishment of ^ocaLcmirts of lowestjjmsdiction ; and while they have effected a revolution, it is a revolution which in the first 72 CHANGE IN NATURE OF USAGE. LECT. in. instance was conservative of the rigidity of native usage. The customs at once altered their character. They are generally collected from the testimony of the village elders ; but when these elders are once called upon to give their evidence, they necessarily lose their old position. They are no longer a half- judicial, half-legislative council. That which they have affirmed to be the custom is henceforward to be sought from the decisions of the Courts of Justice, or from official documents which those courts receive as evidence; such, for example, as the document which, under the name of the Record of Rights, I described to you as a detailed statement of all rights in land drawn up periodically by the functionaries employed in settling the claim of the Government to its share of the rental. Usage, once recorded upon evidence given, immediately becomes written and fixed law. Nor is it any longer obeyed as usage. It is hence- forth obeyed as the law administered by a British Court, and has thus really become a command of the sovereign. The next thing is that the vague sanc- tions of customary law disappear. The local courts have of course power to order and guide the execu- tion of their decrees, and thus we have at once the sanction or penalty following disobedience of the command. And, with the command and with the sanction, come the conceptions of legal right and duty. 1 am not speaking of the logical but of the practical LECT. in. GROWTH OF CONCEPTION OF EIGHT. 73 consequence. If I had to state what for the moment is the greatest change which has come over the people of India and the change which has added most seriously to the difficulty of governing them, I should say it was the growth on all sides of the sense of individual legal right ; of a right not vested in the total group but in the particular member of it aggrieved, who has become conscious that he may call in the arm of the State to force his neighbours to obey the ascertained rule. The spread of this sense of individual right would be an unqualified advantage if it drew with it a corresponding improvement in moral judgment. There would be little evil in the British Government giving to native custom a con- straining force which it never had in purely native society, if popular opinion could be brought to approve of the gradual amelioration:) of that custom. Unfor- tunately for us, we have created the sense of legal right before we have created a proportionate power of distinguishing good from evil in the law upon which the legal right depends* You will see then that the English government of India consciously introduced into India only one of the conceptions discriminated by the juridical analysis of a law. This was the sanction or penalty ; in establishing Courts of Justice they of course con- templated the compulsory execution of decrees. But in introducing one of the terms of the series you will 74 IXFLUEXCE OF ENGLISH LAW. LECT. nr. observe they introduced all the others the political superior, the command, the legal right and the legal duty. I have stated that the process is in itself one conservative of native usage, and that the spirit in- troduced from above into the administration of the law by English lawyers was also one which tended to stereotype custom. You may therefore perhaps recall with some surprise the reason which I assigned in my first Lecture for making haste to read the lessons which India furnishes to the juridical student. Indian usage, with other things Indian, was, I told you, passing away. The explanation is that you have to allow for an influence, which I have merely referred to as yet, in connection with the exceptional English Courts at Calcutta, Madras, and Bombay. Over the interior of India it has only begun to make itself felt of late years, but its force is not yet nearly spent. This is the influence of English law; not, I mean, of the spirit which animates English lawyers and which is eminently conservative, but the conta- gion, so to speak, of the English system of law, the effect which the body of rules constituting it pro- duces by contact with native usage. Primitive cus- tomary law has a double peculiarity : it is extremely scanty in some departments, it is extremely prodigal, of rules in others ; but the departments in which rules are plentiful are exactly those which lose their / importance as the movements of society become J.ECT. in. INFLUENCE OF ENGLISH LAW. 75 quicker and more various. The body of persons to whose memory the customs are committed has pro- bably always been a quasi-legislative, as well as a quasi-judicial body, and has :// al ways added to the stock of usage by tacitly inventing new rules to apply to cases which are really new. When, however, the customary law has once been reduced to writing and recorded by the process which I have described, it does not supply express rules or principles in nearly sufficient number to settle the disputes occasioned by the increased activity of life and the multiplied wants which result from the peace andplenty due to British rule. The consequence is wholesale and indiscrimi- nate borrowing from the English law the most copious system of express rules known to the world. The Judge reads English law-books ; the young native lawyers read them, for law is the study into which the educated youth of the country are throw- ing themselves, and for which they may even be said to display something very like genius. You may ask what authority have these borrowed rules in India. Technically, they have none whatever ; yet, though they are taken (and not always correctly taken) from a law of entirely foreign origin, they are adopted as if they naturally commended themselves to the reason of mankind ; and all that can be saijd of the process is that it is another example of the influence, often felt in European legal history, which 76 CONNECTION OP EASTERN AXD WESTERN JUSTICE. LECT. m. express written law invariably exercises on unwritten customary law when they are found side by side. For myself, I cannot say that I regard this transmu- tation of law as otherwise than lamentable. It is not a correction of native usage where it is unwholesome. It allows that usage to stand, and confirms it rather than otherwise ; but it fills up its interstices with unamalgamated masses of foreign law. And in a very few years it will destroy its interest for the historical jurist, by rendering it impossible to deter- mine what parts of the structure are of native and what of foreign origin. Nor will the remedial pro- cess which it is absolutely necessary to apply for the credit of the British name restore the integrity of the , native system. For the cure can only consist in the enactment of uniform, simple, codified law, formed for the most part upon the best European models. It is most desirable that one great branch of native Indian usage should be thoroughly examined before it decays, inasmuch as it is through it that we are able to connect Indian customary law with what appears / to have once been the customary law of the Western \ World. I speak of the Indian customs of agricultural ' tenure and of collective property in land. For many years past there has been sufficient evidence to warrant the assertion that the oldest dis- coverable forms of property in land were forms of ilective property, and to justify the conjecture that LECT. in. VON MAURER, 77 separate property had grown through a series (though not always an identical series) of changes, out of col- lective property or ownership in common. But the testimony which was furnished by the Western World had one peculiarity. The forms of collective property which had survived and were open to actual observa- tion were believed to be found exclusively in countries peopled by the Sclavonic/race. It is true that histo- rical scholars who had made a special study of the evidence concerning ancient Teutonic holdings, as, for example, the early English holdings, might have been able to assert of them that they pointed to the same conclusions as the Sclavonic forms of village property ; but the existing law of property in land, its actual distribution and the modes of enjoying it, were sup- posed to have been exclusively determined in Teutonic countries by their later history. It was not until Von Maurer published a series of works, in which his conclusions were very gradually developed, that the close correspondence between the early history of Teutonic property and the facts of proprietary enjoy- ment in the Germany of our own day was fully estab- lished ; and not two years have elapsed since Nasse called attention to the plain and abundant vestiges of collective Teutonic property which are to e traced in England. I shall not attempt to do more than give you such a summary of Yon Maurer's conclusions as may suffice THE TEUTONIC VILLAGE COMMUNITIES. LECT. in. to connect them with the results of official observation and administrative enquiry in India. You will find a somewhat fuller compendium of them in the paper contributed by Mr. Morier to the volume recently published, called c Systems of Land Tenure in Various Countries.' Mr. Morier is the English Charge d' Af- faires at Darmstadt, and he assures me that his account of the abundant vestiges of collective property which are to be found in the more backward parts of Germany may easily be verified by the eye. They are extremely plain in some territorial maps with which he has been good enough to supply me. The ancient Teutonic cultivating community, as it existed in Germany itself, appears to have been thus organised. It consisted of a number of families standing in a proprietary relation to a district divided into three parts. These three portions were the Mark of the Township or Village, the Common Mark or waste, and the Arable Mark or cultivated area. The community inhabited the village, held the common mark in mixed ownership, and cultivated the arable mark in lots appropriated to the several families. Each family in the township was governed by its own free head or paterfamilias. The precinct of the family dwelling-house could be entered by nobody but himself and those under his patria potestas, not even by officers of the law, for he himself made law within and enforced law made without. LECT. in. THE TEUTONIC VILLAGE COMMUNITIES. 7f But, while he stood under no relations controllable by others to the members of his family, he stood in a number of very intricate relations to the other heads of families. The sphere of usage or customary lawO was not the family, but the connection of one family with another and with the aggregate community. Confining ourselves to proprietary relations, we find that his rights or (what is the same thing) the rights of his family over the Common Mark are con- trolled or modified by the rights of every other family. It is a^tricLgwnership in common, both in theory and in practice. When cattle grazed on the common pasture, or when the householder felled wood in the common forest, an elected or hereditary officer watched to see that the common domain was equitably enjoyed. But the proprietary relation of the householder which has most interest for us is his relation to the Arable Mark. It seems always in theory to have been originally cut out of the common mark, which indeed can only be described as the portion of the village domain not appropriated to cultivation. In this uni- versally recognised original severance of the arable mark from the common mark we come very close upon the beginning of separate or individual property. The cultivated land of the Teutonic village community appears almost invariably to have been divided into three great fields. A rude rotation of crops was the 80 THE ARABLE MARK. LECT. in. object of this threefold division, and it was intended that each field should lie fallow once in three years. The fields under tillage were not however culti- vated by labour in common. Each householder has his own family lot in each of the three fields, and this he tills by his own labour, and that of his sons and his slaves. But he cannot cultivate as he pleases. He must sow the same crop as the rest of the community, and allow his lot in the uncultivated field to lie fallow with the others. Nothing he does must interfere with the right of other households to have pasture for sheep and oxen in the fallow and among the stubbles of the fields under tillage. The rules regulating the modes of cultivating the various lots seem to have been extremely careful and compli- cated, and thus we may say without much rashness that the earliest law of landed property arose at the same time when the first traces of individual property began to show themselves, and took the form of usages intended to produce strict uniformity of culti- vation in all the lots of ground for the first time appropriated. That these rules should be intricate is only what might be expected. The simplicity of the earliest family law is not produced by any original tendency of mankind, but is merely the simplicity which goes always with pure despotism. Ancient systems of law are in one sense scanty. The number of subjects with which they deal is LECT. in. THE ARABLE MARK. 81 small, and, from the modern jurist's point of view, there are great gaps in them. But the number of minute rules which they accumulate between narrow limits is very surprising. The most astonishing example of this is to be found in the translation of the Ancient Irish law now in course of publication by the Irish Government. The skeleton of this law is meagre enough, but the quantity of detail is vast so vast that I cannot but believe that much of it is attributable to the perverted ingenuity of a class of hereditary lawyers. The evidence appears to me to establish that the Arable Mark of the Teutonic village community was occasionally shifted from one part of the general village domain to another. It seems also to show that the original distribution of the arable area was always into exactly equal portions, corresponding to the number of free families in the township. Nor can it be seriously doubted upon the evidence that the proprietary equality of the families composing the group was at first still further secured by a periodical redistribution of the several assignments. The point is one of some importance. One stage in the transition from collective to individual property was reached when the part of the domain under cultivation was allotted among the Teutonic races to the several families of the township ; another was gained when the system of ' shifting severalties ' came G 82 THE ARABLE MARK. LECT. in. to an end, and each family was confirmed for a perpetuity in the enjoyment of its several lots of land. But there appears to be no country inhabited by an Aryan race in which traces do not remain of the ancient periodical redistribution. It has con- tinued to our own day in the Russian villages. Among the Hindoo villagers there are widely ex- tending traditions of the practice ; and it was doubt- less the source of certain usages, to be hereafter described, which have survived to our day in Eng- land and Germany. I quote from Mr. Morier's paper the following ob- servations. ' These two distinct aspects of the early Teutonic freeman as a " lord " and a " commoner " united in the same person one when within the pale of his homestead, the other when standing outside that pale in the economy of the mark should not be lost sight of. In them are reflected the two salient characteristics of the Teutonic race, the spirit of individuality, and its spirit of association ; and as the action and reaction of these two laws have deter- mined the social and political history of the race, so they have in an especial manner affected and deter- mined its agricultural history*' Those of you who are familiar with the works of Palgrave, Kemble, and Freeman, are aware that the most learned writers on the early English proprietary system give an account of it not at variance in any LECT. in. ENGLISH THEORIES OF LAND-LAW. 83 material point with the description of the Teutonic mark which I have repeated from Yon Maurer. The question, then, which at once presses on us is whether an ancient form of property, which has left on Germany traces so deep and durable that (again to quote Mr. Morier) they may always be followed on ordinary territorial maps, must be believed to have quite died out in England, leaving no sign of itself behind? Unquestionably the answer furnished by the received text-books of English real-property law is affirmative. They either assume, or irresistibly suggest, that the modern law is separated from the ancient law by some great interruption ; and Nasse, the object of whose work is to establish the survival of the Mark in England, allows that German enquirers had been generally under the impression that the history of landed property in this country was characterised by an exceptional discontinuity. There is much in the technical theory of our real- property law which explains these opinions ; and it is less wonderful that lawyers should have been led to them by study of the books, than that no doubt of their soundness should have been created by facts with which practitioners were occasionally well acquainted. These facts, establishing the long con- tinuance of joint cultivation by groups modelled on the community of the Mark, were strongly pressed upon the Select Committee of the House of Commons G 2 84 ENGLISH THEOEIES OF LAND-LAW. LECT. m. which, sat to consider the subject of inclosures in 1844 by a witness, Mr. Blamire, who was at once a lawyer and an official unusually familiar with English landed property in its less usual shapes. Yet Mr. Blamire appears ( c Evidence before Select Committee of 1844,' p. 32, q. 335) to have unreservedly adopted the popular theory on the subject, which I believe to be that at some period sometimes vaguely associated with the feudalisation of Europe, sometimes more precisely with the Norman Conquest the entire soil of England was confiscated ; that the whole of each manor became the lord's demesne; that the lord divided certain parts of it among his free retainers, but kept a part in his own hands to be tilled by his villeins; that all which was not required for this distribution was left as the lord's waste ; and that all customs which cannot be traced to feudal principles grew up insensibly, through the subsequent tolerance of the feudal chief. There has been growing attention for some years past to a part of the observable phenomena which prove the unsoundness of the popular impression. Many have seen that the history of agriculture, of land-law, and of the relations of classes cannot be thoroughly constructed until the process has been thoroughly deciphered by which the common or waste -land was brought under cultivation either by the lord of the manor or by the lord of the manor LECT. in. THE ARABLE MAEK IN ENGLAND. 85 in connection with the commoners. The history of Inclosures and of Inclosure Acts is now recognised as of great importance to our general history. But corresponding study has not, or not of late, been bestowed on another set of traces left by the past. The Arable Mark ha& aiirvived among us as well as the Common Mark or waste, and it the more de- serves our attention in this place because its interest is not social or political but purely juridical. The lands which represent the cultivated portion of the domain of the ancient Teutonic village com- munities are found more or less in all parts of England, but more abundantly in some counties than in others. They are known by various names. When the soil is arable, they are most usually called 'common/ 4 com- monable,'or ' open ' fields, or sometimes simply 4 inter- mixed ' lands. When the lands are in grass, they are sometimes known as 4 lot meadows,' sometimes as 'lammas lands,' though the last expression is occa- sionally used of arable soil. The 4 common fields ' are almost invariably divided into three long strips, sepa- rated by green baulks of turf. The several properties consist in subdivisions of these strips, sometimes exceedingly minute; and there is a great deal of evidence that one several share in each of the strips belonged originally to the same ownership, and that all the several shares in any one strip were originally equal or nearly equal, though in progress of time a 86 THE COMMON FIELDS. LECT. in. good many have been accumulated in the same hands. The agricultural customs which prevail in these common fields are singularly alike. Each strip bears two crops of a different kind in turn and then lies fallow. The better opinion seems to be that the custom as to the succession of crops would not be sustained at law ; but the right to feed sheep or cattle on the whole of one strip during the fallow year, or among the stubbles of the other two strips after the crops have been got in, or on the green baulks which divide the three fields, is generally treated as capable of being legally maintained. This right has in some cases passed to the lord of the manor, but sometimes it is vested in the body of persons who are owners of the several shares in the common fields. The grass lands bear even more distinct traces of primitive usage. The several shares in the arable fields, some- times, but very rarely, shift from one owner to another in each successive year ; but this is frequently the rule with the meadows, which, when they are themselves in a state of severalty, are often distribu- ted once a year by casting lots among the persons entitled to appropriate and enclose them, or else change from one possessor to another in the order of the names of persons or tenements on a roll. As a rule the inclosures are removed after the hay-harvest; and there are manors in which they are taken down by the villagers on Lammas Day (that is, Old LECT. HI. SHIFTING SEVERALTIES. 87 Lammas Day) in a sort of legalised tumultuary assembly. The group of persons entitled to use the meadows after they have been thrown open is often larger than the number of persons entitled to en- close them. All the householders in a parish, and not merely the landowners, are found enjoying this right. The same peculiarity occasionally, but much more rarely, characterises the rights over common arable fields; and it is a point of some interest, since an epoch in the history of primitive groups occurs when they cease to become capable of absorbing strangers. The English cultivating communities may be supposed to have admitted new-comers to a limited enjoyment of the meadows, up to a later date than the period at which the arable land had become the exclusive property of the older families of the group. The statute 24 Geo. II. c. 23, which altered the English Calendar, recites (s. 5) the frequency of these ancient customs and forms of property, and provides that the periods for commencing common enjoyment shall be reckoned by the old account of time. They have been frequently noticed by agri- cultural writers, who have strongly and unanimously condemned them. There is but one voice as to the barbarousness of the agriculture perpetuated in the common arable fields, and as to the quarrels and heart-burning of which the 'shifting severalties' in the meadow land have been the source. But both 88 GEEAT EXTENT OF THE COMMON FIELDS. LECT. in. common fields and common meadows are still plenti- ful on all sides of us. Speaking for myself person- ally, I have been greatly surprised at the number of instances of abnormal proprietary rights, necessarily implying the former existence of collective owner- ship and joint cultivation, which comparatively brief enquiry has brought to my notice ; nor can I doubt that a hundred and fifty years ago instances of such rights could have been produced in vastly greater numbers, since Private Acts of Parliament for the inclosure of commonable fields were constantly passed in the latter part of the last and the earlier part of the present century, and since 1836 they have been extensively enclosed, agglomerated, and exchanged under the Common Fields Inclosure Act passed in that year, and under the general powers more recently vested in the Inclosure Commissioners. The breadth of land which was comparatively recently in an open, waste, or commonable condition, and which therefore bore the traces of the ancient Teu- tonic cultivating system, may be gathered from a passage in which Nasse sums up the statements made in a number of works by a writer, Marshall, whom I shall presently quote. ' In almost all parts of the country, in the Midland and Eastern Counties par- ticularly, but also in the West in Wiltshire for ex- ample in the South, as in Surrey, in the North, as in Yorkshire, there are extensive open and common LECT. in. GREAT EXTENT OF THE COMMON FIELDS. 89 fields. Out of 316 parishes in Northamptonshire, 89 are in this condition; more than 100 in Oxfordshire ; about 50,000 acres in Warwickshire ; in Berkshire, half the county ; more than half of Wiltshire ; in Huntingdonshire, out of a total area of 240,000 acres, 130,000 were commonable meadows, commons, and common fields.' (Ueber die Mittelalterliche Feld- gemeinschaft in England,' p. 4.) The extent of some of the fields may be inferred from the fact, stated to me on good authority, that the pasturage on the divid- ing baulks of turf, which were not more than three yards wide, was estimated in one case at eighty acres. These footprints of the past were quite recently found close to the capital and to the seats of both Uni- versities. In Cambridgeshire they doubtless corre- sponded to the isolated patches of dry soil which were scattered through the fens, and in the metropolitan county of Surrey, of which the sandy and barren soil produced much the same isolation of tillage as did the morasses of the fen country, they occurred so close to London as to impede the extension of its suburbs, through the inconvenient customs which they placed in the Way of building. One of the largest of the common fields was found in the immediate neigh- bourhood of Oxford ; and the grassy baulks which anciently separated the three fields are still conspi- cuous from the branch of the Great Northern Railway which leads to Cambridge. 90 EXTRACT FROM MARSHALL. LECT. in. The extract from Marshall's 4 Elementary^ind Prac- tical Treatise on Landed Property ' (LonJRi, 1804) which I am about to read to you, is in s&me ways very remarkable. Mr. William Marshall was a writer on agriculture who published largely between 1770 and 1820, and he has left an account of the state of cultivation in almost every English county. He had been engaged for many years in 4 studying the im- provement and directing the management of several large estates in England, Wales and Scotland,' and he had taken a keen interest in what he terms 4 provin- cial practices.' The picture of the ancient state of England which follows, was formed in his mind from simple observation of the phenomena of custom, tillage, and territorial arrangement which he saw before his eyes. You will perceive that he had not the true key in his possession, and that he figured to himself the collective form of property as a sort of common farm, cultivated by the tenantry of a single landlord. 4 In this place it is sufficient to premise that a very few centuries ago, nearly the whole of the lands of England lay in an open, and more or less in a com- monable state, Each parish or township (at least in the more central and northern districts), comprised different descriptions of lands ; having been sub- jected, during successive ages, to specified modes of occupancy, under ancient and strict regulations, J,ECT. in. EXTRACT FROM MARSHALL. 91 which timfc had converted to law. These parochial arrangements, however, varied somewhat in different districts : Tout in the more central and greater part of the kingdom, not widely; and the following state- ment may serve to convey a general idea of the whole of what may be termed Common-field Townships, throughout England. 4 Under this ingenious mode of organisation, each parish or township was considered as one common farm ; though the tenantry were numerous. 4 Round the village, in which the tenants resided, lay a few small inclosures, or grass yards ; for rear- ing calves, and as baiting and nursery grounds for other farm stock. This was the common farmstead, or homestall, which was generally placed as near the centre of the more culturable lands of the parish or township as water and shelter would permit. 4 Round the homestall, lay a suit of arable fields ; including the deepest and soundest of the lower grounds, situated out of water's way ; for raising corn and pulse ; as well as to produce fodder and litter for cattle and horses in the winter season. 'And, in the lowest situation, as in the water- formed base of a rivered valley, or in swampy dips, shooting up among the arable lands, lay an extent of meadow grounds, or " ings " ; to afford a supply of hay, for cows and working stock, in the winter and spring months. 92 EXTRACT FROM MARSHALL. LECT. in. 4 On the outskirts of the arable lands, where the soil is adapted to the pasturage of cattle, or on the springy slope of hills, less adapted to cultivation, or in the fenny bases of valleys, which were too wet, or gravelly water formed lands which were too dry, to produce an annual supply of hay with sufficient cer- tainty, one or more stinted pastures, or hams, were laid out for milking cows, working cattle, or other stock which required superior pasturage in summer. ' ' While the bleakest, worst-soiled, and most distant lands of the township, were left in their native mid state ; for timber and fuel ; and for a common pasture, or suit of pastures, for the more ordinary stock of the township ; whether horses, rearing cattle, sheep, or swine ; without any other stint, or restriction, than what the arable and meadow lands indirectly gave ; every joint-tenant, or occupier of the township, having the nominal privilege of keeping as much live-stock on these common pastures, in summer, as the appropriated lands he occupied would maintain, in winter. ' The appropriated lands of each township were laid out with equal good sense and propriety. That each occupier might have his proportionate share of lands of different qualities, and lying in different situations, the arable lands, more particularly, were divided into numerous parcels, of sizes, doubtless, according to the size of the given township, and the number and rank of the occupiers. LECT. in. EXTRACT FROM MARSHALL. 93 i And, that the whole might be subjected to the same plan of management, and be conducted as one common farm, the arable lands were moreover divided into compartments, or " fields," of nearly equal size, and generally three in number, to receive, in constant rotation, the triennial succession of fallow, wheat (or rye) and spring crops (as barley, oats, beans, and peas) : thus adopting and promoting a system of hus- bandry, which, howsoever improper it is become, in these more enlightened days, was well adapted to the state of ignorance, and vassalage, of feudal times ; when each parish or township had its sole proprietor ; the occupiers being at once his tenants and his soldiers, or meaner vassals. The lands were in course liable to be more or less deserted by their occupiers, and left to the feebleness of the young, the aged, and the weaker sex. But the whole township being, in this manner, thrown into one system, the care and management of the live-stock, at least, would be easier and better than they would have been, under any other arrangement. And, at all times, the manager of the estate was better enabled to detect bad hus- bandry, and enforce that which was more profitable to the tenants and the estate, by having the whole spread under the eye, at once, than he would have been, had the lands been distributed in detached inclosed farmlets ; besides avoiding the expense of inclosure. And another advantage arose from this 94 SCOTT ON UDAL TENURES. LECT, in. more social arrangement, in barbarous times : the tenants, by being concentrated in villages, were not only best situated to defend each other from predatory attacks ; but were called out, by their lord, with greater readiness, in cases of emergency.' (Marshall, pp. 111-113.) The readers of the 4 Pirate ' are, I dare say, aware that Sir Walter Scott had his attention strongly attracted to the so-called UdaLtenurea-flf Orkney and Shetland. The fact has more juridical interest than it once had, now that recent writers have succeeded in completely identifying the ancient Scandinavian and ancient German proprietary usages. In the diary which he wrote of his voyage with the Com- missioners of Lighthouses round the coasts of Scot- land, Scott observes : 4 1 cannot get a distinct account of the nature of the land-rights. The Udal pro- prietors have ceased to exist, yet proper feudal tenures seem ill understood. Districts of ground are in many instances understood to belong to townships or communities, possessing what may be arable by patches and what is moor as a commonty pro indi- viso. But then individuals of such a township often take it upon them to grant feus of particular parts of ' the property thus possessed pro indiviso. The town of Lerwick is built upon a part of the commonty of Sound ; the proprietors of the houses having feu-rights from different heritors of that township, but why J.ECT. in. COMMONTY OF LAUDEE. 95 from one ratlier than other .... seems altogether uncertain' (Lockhart's 'Life of Scott/ iii. p, v 3r45). That these tenures survived till lately in the northern islands has been long known, but there has been a general impression that the strict and consistent feudalism of Scotland had effaced the traces of older Teutonic usage in the Lowlands. Yet a Eeturn recently presented to Parliament suggests that a re- examination of Scottish agricultural customs might be usefully undertaken. ' There are/ it is stated, 4 within the bounds of the royalty of the burgh of Lauder 105 separate portions of land called Bur- gess Acres. These vary in extent from one and a half acre to three and a half acres. To each such acre there is a separate progress of writs, and these " Acres " are the private and absolute property of individuals. ... No one has hitherto been admitted a burgess of the burgh who has not been an owner of one of these Burgess Acres. The lands of the burgh consist of .... Lauder Common, extending to about 1,700 acres, which has, from all time of which there is any record, been possessed thus. A portion of it has been set off periodically, say once in five or seven years, to be broken up and ploughed during that time, and at the end of that time fixed has been laid down in grass, and grazed along with the other lands : when another portion of the common was, in the same way, broken up and ploughed, and again laid down in 96 COMMONTY OF LAUDER. LECT. in. grass. The portion of the common so broken up and ploughed at a time has, of recent years, been about 130 acres in extent. An allotment of this portion of the common has been given to the owner of each of the 105 burgess acres, whether he happened to be a burgess or not, one allotment for each acre. The portion laid off for cultivation is, in the first place, cut into the number of allotments required, and the share of each person is decided by lot. The condi- tions attached to the taking of hill parts have been, compliance with a system of cultivation prescribed by the town council, and payment of a small assessment, generally just sufficient to reimburse the burgh for expenses laid out in making roads, drains, &c., to enhance the value of the land for cultivation. These allotments have been called " Hill parts," and the average worth of each is 11. per annum. The whole of the remainder of the common has been used for grazing purposes, and has been occupied as follows : Each burgess resident within the bounds of the burgh has grazed on the common two cows, or an equivalent, and a certain number of sheep at present, and for some years, fifteen ; and each widow of a burgess, resident in the burgh, has grazed on the common one cow, or an equivalent, and a certain number of sheep at present, and for many years, twelve' (' Return of Boroughs or Cities in the United Kingdom, pos- sessing Common Land,' Appendix I., House of Commons, August 10, 1870). LECT. in. PECULIARITIES OF SCOTTISH EXAMPLE. 97 It may be doubted whether a more perfect example of the primitive cultivating community is extant in England or Germany. As compared with the English instances, its form is extremely archaic. The arable mark, cultivated under rules prescribed by the town council, shifts periodically from one part of the domain to another, and the assignment of parcels within the cultivated area is by lot. It is interesting too to observe that the right to land for purposes of tillage is inseparably connected with the ownership of certain plots of land within the township. A similar con- nection between the shares in the common field and certain ancient tenements in a village is sometimes found in England and has been formally established at law. (See the bitter complaints of Marshall, 4 Rural Economy of Yorkshire/ i. 55.) On the other hand, a group of persons more loosely defined has the right to pasture on the part of the common in grass, and this peculiarity occurs also in England. I am informed that most of the Scottish burghs have recently sold their c commonties ; ? but it is to be hoped that all traces of the ancient customs of en- joyment have not been quite obliterated. Upon the evidence collected by Nasse, supplied by the works of Marshall, and furnished by the wit- nesses examined before the Select Committee of 1844, and upon such as I have myself been able to gather, the vestiges of the Teutonic village community which H 98 VESTIGES OF THE MARK. LECT. HI. ., remained before the inclosures of the last century / / / and the present may be thus compendiously described : The arable part of the domain was indicated (1) by simple intermixed fields, i.e. fields of nearly equal size mingled together and belonging .to an extraordinary number of owners, so that, according to Mr. Blamire's statement, in one parish containing 2,831 acres there were (in 1844) 2,315 pieces of open land which included 2,327 acres, giving an average size of one acre (Evidence, Select Committee, p. 17, q. 185) ; (2) by fields of nearly equal size arranged in three long strips and subject to various customs of tillage, the most universal being the fallow observed by each of the strips in successive years ; (3) by * shifting severalties * of arable land, which were not, however, of frequent occurrence ; (4) by the existence of certain rights of pasture over the green baulks which prevented their removal. The portion of the domain kept in grass was represented: (1) by 'shifting severalties' of mea- dow land, which were very frequent, the modes of successive allotment being also very various ; (2) by the removal of inclosures after hay-harvest ; (3) by the exercise, on the part of a community generally larger than the number of persons entitled to enclose, of a right to pasture sheep and cattle on the meadow- land during the period when the hay was not matur- ing for harvest. LBCT. in. VESTIGES OF THE MARK. 99 The rights known to exist over Commons constitute much too large a subject to be treated of here. But two relics of the ancient collective cultivation may be specially mentioned. The supervision of the commu- nal officer who watched over the equitable enjoyment of the pastures has become the custom of ' stint of common,' by which the number of the beasts which the commoner might turn out on the waste is limited and regulated. There is also a good deal of evidence that some commons, now entirely waste, bear the traces of ancient tillage. The most probable explana- tion is that in these cases the whole of the arable mark had been removed from one part of the domain to another, and that the traces of cultivation show the place of common fields anciently deserted. H 2 LECTURE IV. THE EASTERN VILLAGE COMMUNITY. CONTENTS. \ The Indian Village Community Mahometan Theory of Ownership Land Settlement of Bengal The Indian Proprietary Unit The Indian Village The Cultivated Land The Growth of Custom- Water Rules The Sources of Primitive Law Customs of Re- partition The Village Secrecy of Family Life Dislike of English Criminal Law Fictions Attending Legislation Village 'Rules Origin of Indian Towns Indian Capitals The Village Waste The Indian Wastes The Government and the Wastes The Village Council Peaceful Character of Population Hereditary Trades Remuneration of Village Traders The Outsiders Absorption ol Strangers by Community. LECT. iv. THE INDIAN VILLAGE COMMUNITY. JOS LECTURE IV. THE EASTERN VILLAGE COMMUNITY. I PROPOSE in this Lecture to describe summarily and remark upon the Indian forms of property and tenure corresponding to the ancient modes of holding , and cultivating land in Europe which I discussed at | some length last week. It does not appear to me a hazardous proposition that the Indian and the ancient European systems of enjoyment and tillage by men grouped in village communities are in all essential 1 particulars identical. There are differences of detail between them, and I think you will find the discus- sion of these differences and of their apparent causes not uninteresting nor barren of instruction to the student of jurisprudence. No Indian phenomenon has been more carefully examined, and by men more thoroughly in earnest, than the Village Community. For many years past the discovery and recognition of its existence have ranked among the greatest achievements of Anglo- Indian administration. But the Village Community did not emerge into clear light very early in the 104 MAHOMETAN THEORY OF OWNERSHIP. LECT. iv, history of our conquest and government. Although this peculiar group is referred to in Manu, the English found little to guide them to its great importance in the Brahminical codified law of the Hindoos which they first examined. Perhaps in the large space assigned in that law to joint -property and partitions they might have found a hint of the truth, if the great province in which they were first called upon to practise administration on a large scale, Lower Bengal or Bengal Proper, had not happened to be the exact part of India in which, from causes not yet fully determined, the village system had fallen into great decay. The assumption which the English first made was one which they inherited from their Mahometan predecessors. It was, that all the soil belonged in absolute property to the sovereign, and that all private property in land existed by his Sufferance. The Mahometan theory and the corre- sponding Mahometan practice had put out of sight the ancient view of the sovereign's rights, which, though it assigned to him a far larger share of the produce of the land than any western ruler has ever claimed, yet in nowise denied the existence of private property in land. The English began to act in perfect good faith on the ideas which they found universally prevailing among the functionaries whom they had taken over from the Mahometan semi-independent viceroys de- throned by their arms. Their earliest experiments, LECT. TV. LAND SETTLEMENT OF BENGAL. 105 tried in the belief that the soil was theirs and that any land-law wonld be of their exclusive creation, have now passed into proverbs of maladroit management. The most famous of them was the settlement of Lower Bengal by Lord Cornwallis. It was an at- tempt to create a landed-proprietary like that of this^ country. The policy of conferring estates in fee simple on the natural aristocracy of certain parts of fc India (and I mean by a c natural aristocracy ' an aristocracy formed under purely native conditions of society by what amounts to the sternest process of natural selection) has had many fervent advocates among Indian functionaries, and has very lately been carried out on a considerable scale in the newly- conquered province of Oudh. But the great pro- prietors established by Lord Cornwallis were un-| doubtedly, with few exceptions, the tax -gather ersjof the former Mahometan viceroy. The recoil from what was soon recognised as a mistake, brought a system into fashion which had been tried on a small scale at an earlier date, and which was in fact the reverse of Lord Cornwallis's experiment. In the southern provinces of the peninsula, the English Government began to recognise nothing between itself and the immediate cultivators of the soil; and from them it took directly its share of the produce. The effect was to create a peasant-proprietary. This system, of which the chief seat was the province of Madras, has, in i 10G THE INDIAN PROPRIETARY UNIT. LECT. iv. my opinion, been somewhat unjustly decried. Now that it has been modified in some details, and that some mistakes first committed have been corrected, there is no more prosperous population in India than that which has been placed under it; but undoubtedly it is not the ancient system of the country. It was not till English conquest was extending far to the north- west, and till warlike populations were subjugated whose tastes and peculiarities it was urgently neces- sary to study, that the true proprietary unit of India was discovered. It has ever since been most carefully and continuously observed. There have been many vehement and even violent disputes about some of its characteristics; but these disputes will always, I think, be found to arise, or at least to derive their point, from an attempt to make it fit in with some theory of English origin. There is no substantial difference of opinion about its great features. I regret exceedingly that I cannot refer you to any book in which there is a clear or compendious account of it. Perhaps the best and most intelligible is that given by a distinguished Indian functionary, Mr. George Campbell, in that same volume on c Systems of Land Tenure' to which I referred you for Mr. Morier's summary of Yon Maurer's conclusions. But the de- scription is necessarily much too brief for a subject of such extent, and full information must be obtained from the extensive literature of Revenue and Settlement LECT. iv. THE INDIAN VILLAGE. (^107 which I spoke of some time since as having had its materials collected by quasi-judicial agencies. But the student who attempts to consult it should be warned that much of the elementary knowledge which has to be acquired before its value and interest can be completely understood is only at present to be gathered from the oral statements of experienced Indian functionaries. In the account of the Indian cultivating group which follows you will understand that I confine myself to fundamental points, and further that I am attempting to describe a typical form to which the village communities appear to me upon the evidence I have seen to approximate, rather than a model to which all existing groups called by the name can be exactly fitted. If very general language were employed, the description of the Teutonic or Scandinavian village communities might actually serve as a description of the same institution in India. There is the arable? mark, divided into separate lots but cultivated A according to minute customary rules binding on allj Wherever the climate admits of the finer grass crops, there are the reserved meadows, lying generally on the verge of the arable mark. There is the waste or common land, out of which the arable mark has been cut, enjoyed as pasture by all the community pro indiviso. There is the village, consisting of habita- tions each ruled by a despotic pater-familias. And 108 THE CULTIVATED LAND. LECT. iv. there is constantly a council of government to deter- mine disputes as to custom. But there are some characteristics of the institution of which no traces, or very faint traces, remain in Europe, though they probably once existed, and there _are some differences between the European and Indian examples. Iden- tity in the main being assumed, a good deal of instruction may be obtained from these distinctions of detail. First as to the arable mark, or cultivated portion of 1 the village domain. Here you will naturally expect the resemblances to be general rather than specific. The official publications on Indian Settlement law contain evidence that in some parts of the country the division into three common fields is to be found; but I do not attach any importance to the fact, which is probably quite accidental. The conditions of agriculture in a tropical country are so widely different from those which can at any period be supposed to have determined cultivation in Northern and Central Europe as to forbid us to look for any resemblances in India, at once widely extended and exact, to the Teutonic three-field system. Indeed, as the great agent of production in a tropical country \is water, very great dissimilarities in modes of 1 cultivation are produced within India itself by relative proximity to running streams and relative exposure to the periodical rain -fall. The true iv. GROWTH OF CUSTOM. 109 analogy between the existing Indian and the ancient European systems of tillage must be sought in the minute but multifarious rules governing the pro- ceedings of the cultivators ; rules which in both cases have the same object to reconcile a common plan and order of cultivation on the part of the whole brotherhood with the holding of distinct lots < in the arable land by separate families. The common life of the group or community has been so far broken up as to admit of private property in cultivated land, but not so far as to allow departure from a joint system of cultivating that land. There have been functionaries serving the British Government of India who have had the opportunity of actually observing the mode in which rules of this kind grow up. Wherever the great canals of irrigation which it has constructed pass through provinces in which the system of village communities survives in any completeness, the Government does not undertake or perhaps I should rather say it has not hitherto undertaken the detailed distribution of water to the peasants inha- biting the village. It bargains with them to take a certain quantity of water in return for a certain addition to the revenue assessed upon them, and) leaves them, when the water has once been conducted to the arable mark, to divide it between themselves as they please. A number of minute rules for regu- 110 WATER RULES. LECT. iv. lating each man's share of the water and mode of using it are then imposed on the village, by the council of elders, by the elective or hereditary func- tionary who sometimes takes its place, or by the person who represents the community in its con- tracts with Government for payment of land-rent. I have been told, however, by some of those who have observed the formation of these rules, that they do not purport to emanate from the personal authority of their author or authors ; nor do they assume to be dictated by a sense of equity ; there is always, I am assured, a sort of fiction, under which some customs as to the distribution of water are supposed to have existed from all antiquity, although in fact no artificial supply had been even so much as thought of. It is further stated that, though it is extremely common among English functionaries to speak of the distribution of water as regulated by the agreement of the villagers, yet no such idea really enters the mind of the community or of its represen- tatives as that there can be or ought to be an express or implied contract among the cultivators respecting their several shares. And it is added that, rather than have a contract or agreement, it would appear to them a much more natural and reasonable arrange- ment that the distribution should be determined by casting lots. Authority, Custom, or Chance are in fact the great sources of law in primitive communi- LECT. iv. THE SOURCES OF PRIMITIVE LAW. Ill ties as we know them, not Contract. Not that in the \ t minds of men who^ are at this stage of thought the acknowledged sources of law are clearly discrimi- nated. There are many customary duties of which the most plausible account that can be given is that they were at the outset obligations of kinship, sanctioned by patriarchal authority ; yet childish stories attributing their origin to mere accident are often current among the Indian villagers, or they are said to be observed in obedience to the order of some comparatively modern king. I have already said that the power of the sovereign to create custom is] very generally recognised in India ; and it might even be said that such ideas of the obligatory force of agreement as exist are nowadays greatly mixed up with the notion of obedience to government. It is often stated that an agreement written on the stamped paper of the State acquires in the native view a quality which is quite independent of the legal operation of the stamp ; and there is reason to believe that the practice, which prevails through whole provinces, of never performing an agreement till performance has been decreed by a Court, is to a ? very great extent accounted for by an impression that contracts are not completely binding till the State has directed them to be executed. Among the non-Aryan peasantry who form a con- siderable proportion of the population in the still 112 CUSTOMS OF RE-PARTITION. LECT. iv. thinly peopled territory called the Central Provinces, the former highroad of Mahratta brigandage, there are examples of the occasional removal of the entire arable mark from one part of the village domain to another, and of the periodical redistribution of lots within the cultivated area. But I have not obtained information of any systematic removal, and still less of any periodical re -partition of the cultivated lands, when the cultivators are of Aryan origin. But ex- perienced Indian officials have told me that though the practice of redistribution may be extinct, the tradition of such a practice often remains, and the disuse of it is sometimes complained of as a grievance. If English influence has had anything to do with arresting customs of re-partition, which are, no doubt, quite alien to English administrative ideas, it is a fresh example of destructive influence, unwillingly and unconsciously exercised. For the separate, un- changeable, and irremovable family lot in the culti- vated area, if it be a step forwards in the history of property, is also the point at which the IndianTviIIage community is breaking to pieces. The probability, however, is that the causes have had their operation much hastened by the English, but have not been created by them. The sense of personal right grow- "mg-everywhere into greater strength, and the ambi- tion which points to wider spheres of action than can be found within the Community, are both destructive LECT. iv. THE VILLAGE. 113 of the authority of its internal rules. Even more fatal is the increasing feeling of the sacredness of personal obligation arising out of contract. The par- tition of inheritances and execution for debt levied on land are destroying the communities this is the formula heard nowadays everywhere in India. The brotherhood of the larger group may still cohere, but the brethren of some one family are always wishing to have their shares separately; and creditors who would have feared to intrude on the village domain now break the net of custom by stepping without ceremony into the lot of a defaulting debtor. I now pass to the village itself, the cluster of home- steads inhabited by the members of the community. The description given by Maurer of the Teutonic Mark, of the Township, as his researches have shown it to him, might here again pass for an account, so far as it goes, of an Indian village. The separate households, each despotically governed by its family chief, and never trespassed upon by the footstep of any person of different blood, are all to be found there in practice ; although the theory of the absolute rights of heads of families has never, from the nature of the case, been acknowledged by the British Government. But the Indian villages have one characteristic which could only have been gathered from observation of a living society. The German writers have been struck with that complete immunity of the Teutonic homestead I 114 SECRECY OF FAMILY LIFE. LECT. iv. from all external interference, which in this country found a later expression in the long-descended common -place that an Englishman's house is his castle. But a characteristic which in India~ goes along with this immunity, and to a great extent explains it, is the extraordinary secrecy of family life; a secrecy maintained, I am told, in very humble households and under difficulties which at first sight would seem insurmountable. There can be no ques- tion that, if the isolation of households in ancient societies was always accompanied by this secrecy of * their interior life, much which is not quite intelli- gible in early legal history would be explained. It is not, for example, easy to understand the tardiness with which, in Eoman society, the relations of Pater- familias and Filius-familias became the subject of moral judgment, determining the interference of the Praetor ; or, again, taking the form of public opinion, and so ultimately issuing in legislation. But this would be much more comprehensible if the secrets of family life were nearly as carefully guarded as they are at this moment, even in those parts of India where the peculiar Mahometan jealousy, which has sometimes been erroneously thought a uni- versal Eastern feeling, has never yet penetrated. So, again, it is only a conjectural explanation of the scantiness of ancient systems of law as they appear in the monuments in which an attempt was made to set them formally forth, that the lawgiver LECT. iv. DISLIKE OF ENGLISH CRIMINAL LAW. 115 merely attempted to fill, so to speak, the inter- stices between the families, of which the aggrega- tion formed the society. To the extent to which existing Indian society is a type of a primitive society, there is no doubt that any attempt of the public law- giver to intrude on the domain reserved to the legis- lative and judicial power of the pater-familias causes, the extremest scandal and disgust. Of all branches of law, criminal law is that which one would suppose to excite least resentment by trespassing on the for- bidden limits. Yet, while many ignorant statements are constantly made about the rash disturbance of native Indian ideas by British law and administration, there is really reason to believe that a grievance most genuinely felt is the impartiality of that admirable Penal Code which was not the least achievement of Lord Macaulay's genius, and which is undoubtedly destined to serve some day as a model for the crimi- nal law of England. I have had described to me a collection of street-songs, sung in the streets of the city which is commonly supposed to be most impa- tient of British rule by persons who never so much as dreamed of having their words repeated to an English- man. They were not altogether friendly to the foreign rulers of the country, but it may be broadly laid down that they complained of nothing which might naturally have been expected to be the theme of complaint. And, without exception, they declared i 2 116 FICTIONS ATTENDING LEGISLATURE. LECT. iv. that life in India had become intolerable since the English criminal laws had begun to treat women and children as if they were men. I read to you from Mr. Morier's compendium of Yon Maurer's results, a passage pointedly con- trasting the independence of the Teutonic freeman in his homestead and its appurtenances with his com- plete subjection to customary rule when he cultivated the arable mark, or pastured his sheep and cattle in the common mark. I trust there is no presumption in my saying that in some of the most learned writers on the Mark, there seems to me too great a tendency to speak of the relations of the free chiefs of Teutonic households to one another as determined by what, for want of a more appropriate term, must be called spon- taneous legislation. It is no doubt very difficult, in observing an Indian village community, to get rid of the impression that the council of elders, which is the only Indian counterpart of the collective assembly of Teutonic villagers, occasionally legislates; and, if very strict language be employed, legislation is the only term properly expressing the invention of customary rules to meet cases which are really new. Yet, if I may trust the statements of several eminent Indian authorities, it is always the fact or the fiction that / this council merely declares customary law. And indeed, while it is quite true of India that the head of the family is supposed to be chief of the household, LECT. iv. VILLAGE RULES. 117 the families within the village or township would seem to be bound together through their representa- tive heads by just as intricate a body of customary rules as they are in respect of those parts of the village domain which answer to the Teutonic common mark and arable mark. The truth is, that nothing can be more complex than the customs of an Indian -i- T~ J village, though in a sense they are only binding on * chiefs of families. The examination of these customs, which have for their object to secure a self-acting or- ganisation not only for the community as a whole, but for the various trades and callings which fractions of it pursue, does not fall within the scope of the present Lectures, but it is a subject full of interest. I ob- serve that recent writers are dissatisfied with the his- torical theory which attributes the municipal institu- tions of mediaeval Europe to an exclusively Roman origin, and that they are seeking to take into account the usages inherited from the conquerors of the Empire. From this point of view, the customary rules securing the interdependence and mutual re- sponsibility of the members of an Indian village community, or of the various subordinate groups which it may be shown to include, and the modes of speech in use among them, which are said to fluctuate between language implying an hereditary_brotherhood and language implying a voluntary association, appear to be worthy of careful examination. There is reason 118 ORIGIN OF INDIAN TOWNS. LECT. iv. $ to believe that some European cities were originally nothing more than the township-mark of a Teu- tonic village community which has subsequently grown to greatness. It is quite certain that this was the origin of the large majority of the towns which you see marked on the map of India. The village, in becoming more populous from some cause or other, has got separated from its cultivated or common do- main ; or the domain has been swallowed up in it ; or a number of different villages have been founded close together on what was perhaps at one time unprofit- able waste land, but which has become exceptionally valuable through advantages of situation. This last was the origin of the great Anglo-Indian city of Cal- cutta, which is really a collection of villages of very modern foundation. Here, however, it may be proper that I should state that the very greatest Indian cities had a beginning of another kind. Doubtless most of the Indian towns grew out of vil- lages, or were originally clusters of villages, but the most famous of all grew out of camps. The Mogul Emperors and the Kings of the more powerful Hindoo dynasties differed from all known sovereigns of the Western world, not only in the singular indefiniteness of the boundaries of their dominions and in the per- petual belligerency which was its consequence, but in the vast onerousness of their claims on the industry of their subjects. From the people of a country of LECT. iv. INDIAN CAPITALS. 119 which the wealth was almost exclusively agricultural, they took so large a share of the produce as to leave nothing practically to the cultivating groups except the bare means of tillage and subsistence. Nearly all the movable capital of the empire or kingdom was at once swept away to its temporary centre, which became the exclusive seat of skilled manufacture and decorative art. Every man who claimed to belong to the higher class of artificers took his loom or his tools and followed in the train of the King. This diversion of the forms of industry which depend on movable wealth to the seat of the court had its first > result in the splendour of Oriental capitals. But at the same time it made it easier to change their site, regarded as they continued to be in the light of the encampment of the sovereign for the time being. Great deserted cities, often in close proximity to one another, are among the most striking and at first sight the most inexplicable of Indian spectacles. Indian cities were not, however, always destroyed by the caprice of the monarch who deserted them to found another capital. Some peculiar manufacture had sometimes so firmly established itself as to , survive the desertion, and these manufacturing towns sometimes threw out colonies. Capitals, ex-capitals retaining some special art or manufacture, the colonies of such capitals or ex-capitals, villages grown to exceptional greatness, and a certain number of 120 THE VILLAGE WASTE. LECT. iv. towns which have sprung up round the temples built on sites of extraordinary sacredness, would go far to complete the list of Indian cities. The Waste or common land of the Village Com- munity has still to be considered. One point of difference between the view taken of it in the East and that which seems at all times to have been taken in Europe, deserves to be specially noted. The members of the Teutonic community appear to have valued the village waste chiefly as pasture for their cattle, and possibly may have found it so profitable for this purpose as to have deliberately refrained from increasing that cultivated portion of it which had been turned into the arable mark. These rights of pasture vested in the commoners are those, I need scarcely tell you, which have descended but little modified to our own day in our own country; and it is only the modern improvements in the methods of agriculture which have disturbed the balance between pasture f and tillage, and have thus tended to multiply Inclosure 1 Acts. But the vast bulk of the natives of India are a grain and not a flesh-eating people. Cattle are mostly regarded by them as auxiliary to tillage. The view therefore generally taken (as I am told) of the common -land by the community is that it is that part of the village -domain which is temporarily unculti- vated, but which will some time or other be cultivated and merge in the arable mark. Doubtless it is valued LECT. iv. THE INDIAN WASTES. 121 for pasture, but it is more especially valued as po- tentially capable of tillage. The effect is to produce in the community a much stronger- sense of property in common-land than at all reflects the vaguer feeling of right which, in England at all events, characterises the commoners. In the later days of the East India Company, when all its acts and omissions were very bitterly criticised, and amid the general re -opening of Indian questions after the military insurrection of 1857, much stress was laid on the great amount of waste land which official returns showed to exist in India, and it was more than hinted that better government would bring these wastes under cultivation, possibly under cotton cultivation, and even plant them with English colonists. The answer of experienced Indian functionaries was that there was no waste land at all in India. If you except certain territories which stand to India Proper much as the tracts of land at the base of the Rocky Mountains stand to the United States as, for example, the Indo-Chinese province of Assam the reply is substantially correct. The so-called waste lands are part of the domain of the various communities which the villagers, theoreti- cally, are only wanting opportunity to bring under cultivation. Yet this controversy elicited an admis- sion which is of some historical interest. It did appear that, though the native Indian Government had foil the most part left the village communities entirely id \ 122 THE GOVERNMENT AND THE WASTES. LECT. iv. themselves on condition of their paying the revenue as- sessed upon them, they nevertheless sometimes claimed (though in a vague and occasional way) some ex- ceptional authority over the wastes ; and, acting on this precedent, the British Government, at the various settlements of Land Revenue, has not seldom inter- fered to reduce excessive wastes and to re -apportion uncultivated land among the various communities of a district. In connection with this claim and exercise of right you will call to mind the power vested in the early English Kings to make grants of waste to in- dividuals in severalty, first with and afterwards without the consent of the Witan ; and we shall see that the much more extensive rights acquired by the lord over the waste than over any other portion of the village - domain, constitute a point of capital importance in the process known as the feudalisation of Europe. India has nothing answering to the assembly of adult males which is so remarkable a feature of the ancient Teutonic groups, except the Council of Village Elders. It is not universally found. Villages fre- quently occur in which the affairs of the community are managed, its customs interpreted, and the disputes of its members decided by a single Headman, whose oince is sometimes admittedly hereditary but is some- times described as elective ; the choice being generally, however, in the last case confined in practice to the members of one particular family, with a strong pre- LECT. iv. THE VILLAGE COU ference for the eldest male of the kindred, if he be not specially disqualified. But I have good authority for saying that, in those parts of India in which the village community is most perfect and in which there are the clearest signs of an original pro- prietary equality between all the families composing the ^ group, the authority exercised elsewhere by the Head^JJ man is lodged with the Village^Council. It is always viewed as a representative body, and not as a body possessing inherent authority, and, whatever be its real number, it always bears a name which recalls its ancient constitution of Five persons. I shall have hereafter to explain that, though there are strong general resemblances between the Indian village communities wherever they are found in any- thing like completeness, they prove on close inspection to be not simple but composite bodies, including a number of classes with very various rights and claims. One singular proof of this variety of interests, and at the same time of the essentially representative charac- ter of the village council, is constantly furnished, I am told, by a peculiar difficulty of the Anglo-Indian functionary when engaged in 4 settling ' a province in which the native condition of society has been but little broken up. The village council, if too numerous, is sure to be unmanageable ; but there is great pressure from all sections of the community to be represented in it, and it is practically hard to keep its numbers 124 PEACEFUL CHARACTER OF POPULATION. LECT. iv. down. The evidence of the cultivators as to custom does not point, I am told, to any uniform mode of representation ; but there appears to be a general admission that the members of the council should be elderly men. No example of village or of district government recalling the Teutonic assembly of free adult males has been brought to my notice. While I do not affect to give any complete explana- tion of this, it may be proper to remember that, though no country was so perpetually scourged with war as India before the establishment of the Pax Britannica, the people of India were never a military people. Nothing is told of them resembling that '. arming of an entire society which was the earliest, as it is the latest, phase of Teutonic history. No rule can be laid down of so vast a population without ex- ceptions. The Mahratta brigands when they first rose against the Mahometans were a Hindoo Hill-tribe armed to a man ; and before the province of Oudh was annexed, extreme oppression had given an universally military character to a naturally peaceful population. But, for the most part, the Indian village communities have always submitted without resistance i to oppression by monarchs surrounded by mercenary I armies. The causes, therefore, which in primitive societies give importance to young men in the village assembly were wanting. The soldiers of the com- munity had gone abroad for mercenary service, and LECT. iv. HEREDITARY TRADES. 125 nothing was required of the council but experience and civil wisdom. There is yet another feature of the Indian cultiva- whirrh connects them with primitive Western communities of the same kind. I have several times spoken of them as organised and self- acting. They, in fact, include a nearly complete establishment of occupations and trades for enabling them to continue their collective life without assist- ance from any person or body external to them. Besides the Headman or Council exercising quasi- judicial, quasi-legislative, power, they contain a vil- lage police, now recognised and paid in certain provinces by the British Government. They in- clude several families of hereditary traders ; the Blacksmith, the Harness -maker, the Shoemaker. The Brahmin is also found for the performance of ceremonies, and even the Dancing-Girl for attend- ance at festivities. There is invariably a Yillage- Accountant, an important personage among an unlettered population, so important, indeed, and so conspicuous that, according to reports current in India, the earliest English functionaries engaged in settlements of land were occasionally led by their assumption that there must be a single proprietor somewhere, to mistake the Accountant for the owner of the village, and to record him as such in the official register. But the person practising any one 126 REMUNERATION OF VILLAGE TRADERS. LECT. iv. of these hereditary employments is really a servant of the community as well as one of its component members. He is sometimes paid by an allowance in grain, more generally by the allotment to his family of a piece of cultivated land in hereditary possession. Whatever else he may demand for the wares he produces, is limited by a customary standard of price, very rarely departed from. It is the assign- ment of a definite lot in the cultivated area to particular trades, which allows us to suspect that the early Teutonic groups were similarly self-sufficing. There are several English parishes in which certain pieces of land in the common field have from time immemorial been known by the name of a particular trade ; and there is often a popular belief that nobody, not following the trade, can legally be owner of the lot associated with it. And it is possible that we here have a key to the plentifulness and persistence of certain names of trades as surnames among us. It is a remarkable fact that certain callings, ex- tremely respectable and lucrative, do not appear in India to constitute those who follow them mem- bers of the village community. Eminent officials have assured me that, so far as their experience ex- tends, the Grain-dealer is never a hereditary trader incorporated with the village group, nor is he a member of the municipality in towns which have grown out of one or more villages. The trades thus LECT. iv. THE OUTSIDERS. 127 remaining outside the organic group are those which bring their goods from distant markets; and I shall try to show the significance of this fact hereafter. There are in Central and Southern India certain villages to which a class of persons is hereditarily at- tached in such a manner as to show most unmistakeably that they form no part of the natural and organic aggregate to which the bulk of the villagers belong. These persons are looked upon as essentially jmpure ; they never enter the village, or only enter reserved portions of it; and their touch is avoided as con- taminating. It is difficult to read or listen to the accounts given of them without having the mind carried to those singular races or classes which, in certain European countries, were supposed almost to our own day to transmit from father to son the taint of a mysterious uncleanness. Yet these Indian 4 outsiders,' as they have been called (by Sir H. B. Frere in 4 The Church and the Age,' p. 357), to avoid using the word ' outcast,' which has a different meaning, bear extremely plain marks of their origin. Though they are not included in the village, they are an appendage solidly connected with it ; they have definite village duties, one of which is the settlement of boundaries, on which their authority is allowed to be conclusive. They evidently repre- sent a population of alien blood, whose lands have been occupied by the colonists or invaders forming 128 ABSORPTION OF STRANGERS BY COMMUNITY. LECT. iv. the community. Everybody who has used his eyes in India will be on his guard against certain ex- travagances of the modern theory of Race, and will ,f>e slow to believe that identity of language anch 'identity of religion necessarily imply identity of etlX nical origin. The wonderful differences of external aspect which are readily perceived between natives of Indian provinces speaking the same language, and the great deviation from what is regarded as the Aryan type of form and feature observable among populations whose speech is a near derivative from Sanscrit, have their most reasonable explanation in the power of absorption which the village group may from many indications be inferred to have possessed in the earlier stages of development. But the faculty of taking in strangers from without is one which it loses in time, and there were always probably some materials too obstinately and obtru- sively foreign to be completely absorbed. Under this last head, the ' outsiders ' of the Southern villages apparently fall. LECTURE V. THE PROCESS OF FEUDALISATION. CONTENTS. Feudalism The Benefices The Manor The Manorial Group New Condition of the Waste Changes in the Grass-lands The Free Tenants Settlements of Villeins The Manorial Courts Encroach- ments of the Lord Roman and Feudal Law Causes of Feudalisation Growth of Suzerainties Leading Families Elements of Feudal System Systematic Feudalism Antiquarianism of Indian Politics Political Results of Settlements Various Forms of Settlement Growth in Power of Official Holder Mahometan Assumptions Indian Schools of Opinion Indian Forms of Property The Headman Property Recognised by the English Absolute Ownership Nature of Rights of Property Development of Absolute Ownership Vested Rights in India The Feudalisation of Europe Cultivation of Waste-land Improvements in Tillage Village Communities and Customs Customary Tillage Servile Dependants of Villagers Villages Cease to Absorb Strangers Nasse's Work The Statute of Devises ^Rules for Construing Wills Restraints on Testamentary Power. J,ECT. v. FEUDALISM. 131 LECTURE V. THE PROCESS OF FEUDAL IS ATION. THE student of legal antiquities who has once con- vinced himself that the soil of the greatest part of Europe was formerly owned and tilled by proprietary groups, of substantially the same character and com- position as those which are still found in the only parts of Asia which are open to sustained and care- ful observation, has his interest immediately drawn to what, in truth, is the great problem of legal history. This is the question of the process by which the pri- mitive mode of enjoyment was converted into the agrarian system, out of which immediately grew the land-law prevailing in all Western Continental Europe before the first French Revolution, and from which is demonstrably descended our own existing real- property law. For this newer system no name has come into general use except Feudalism, a word which has the defect of calling attention to one set only of its characteristic incidents. We cannot reasonably doubt that one partial explanation of its origin is, so far as it goes, correct. It arose from or was greatly K 2 132 THE BENEFICES. LECT. v. influenced by the Benefices, grants of Roman provin- cial land by the chieftains of the tribes which overran the Roman Empire ; such grants being conferred on their associates upon certain conditions, of which the commonest was military service. There is also toler- ably universal agreement that somewhere in Roman law (though where, all are not agreed) are to be found the rules which determined the nature of these beneficiary holdings. This may be called the theory of the official origin of feudalism, the enjoyment of land being coupled with the discharge of certain de- finite duties; and there are some who complete the theory by asserting that among the Teutonic races, at all events, there was an ineradicable tendency in all offices to become hereditary, and that thus the Benefices, which at first were held for life, became at last descendible from father to son. There is no question, as I said, that this account is more than probable, and that the Benefices either began or hastened the changes which led ultimately to feudalism. Yet I think that nobody whose mind has dwelt on the explanation, has brought himself to regard it as complete. It does not tell us how the Benefices came to have so extraordinary a historical fortune. It does not account for the early, if partial, feudalisation of countries like Germany and England, where the cultivated soil was in the hands of free and fully organised communities, and was not, like the LECT. v. THE MANOR. 133 land of Italy or Gaul, at the disposal of a conquering king where the royal or national grants which re- sembled the Benefices were probably made out of waste land and where the influence of Roman law was feebly felt or not at all. The feudalisation of any one country in Europe must be conceived as a process including a long series of political, administrative, and judicial changes; and there is some difficulty in confining our discussion of it to changes in the condition of property which be- long more properly to this department of study. But I think we may limit our consideration of the subject by looking at it in this way. If we begin with modern English real -property law, and, by the help of its records and of the statutes affecting it, trace its history backwards, we come upon a period at which the soil of England was occupied and tilled by separ- ate proprietary societies. Each of these societies is, or bears the marks of having been, a compact and organically complete assemblage of men, occupying a definite area of land. Thus far it resembles the old cultivating communities, but it differs from them in being held together by a variety of subordinate rela- tions to a feudal chief, single or corporate, the Lord. I will call the new group the Manorial group, and though my words must not be taken as strictly correct, I will say that a group of tenants, autocra- tically organised and governed, has succeeded a 134 THE MANORIAL GROUP. LECT. v. group of households of which the organisation and government were democratic. The new group, as known to our law, is often in a state of dissolution, but, where it is perfect, it consists of a number of persons holding land of the Lord by free tenures, and of a number of persons holding land of the Lord by tenures capable of being shown to have been, in their origin, servile the authority of the Lord being exercised over both classes, although in different ways, through the agency of a peculiar tribunal, the Court Baron. The lands held by the first description of tenants are technically known as the Tenemental lands ; those held by the second class constitute the Lord's Domain. Both kinds of land are essential to the completeness of the Manorial group. If there are not Tenemental lands to supply a certain mini- mum number of free tenants to attend the Court Baron, and, according to the legal theory, to sit with the lord as its judges, the Court Baron can no longer in strictness be held ; if it be continued under such circumstances, as it often was in practice, it can only be upheld as a Customary Manorial Court, sitting for the assessment and receipt of customary dues from the tenants of the Domain. On the other hand, if there be no Domain, or if it be parted with, the authority of the Lord over the free tenants is no longer Manorial; it becomes a Seignory in gross, or mere Lordship. LECT. v. NEW CONDITION OF THE WASTE. 135 Since much of the public waste land of our country is known to have passed by national or royal grant to individuals or corporations, who, in all probability, brought it extensively under cultivation from the first by servile labour, it cannot be supposed that each of the new Manorial groups takes the place of a Village group which at some time or other consisted of free allodial proprietors. Still, we may accept the belief of the best authorities that over a great part of England there has been a true succession of one group to the other. Comparing, then, the two, let us ask what are the specific changes which have taken place ? The first, and far the most important \ of all, is that, in England as everywhere in Western Europe, the waste or common-land of the community has become the lord's waste. It is still ancillary to the Tenemental lands ; the free tenants of the lord, whom we may provisionally take to represent the freemen of the village community, retain all their ascertained rights of pasture and gathering firewood, and in some cases similar rights have been acquired by other classes; but, subject to all ascertained rights, the waste belongs, actually or potentially, to the lord's domain. The lord's ' right of approvement,' affirmed by the Statute of Merton, and extended and confirmed by subsequent statutes, permits him to enclose and appropriate so much of the waste as is not wanted to satisfy other existing rights ; nor can it be doubted 136 CHANGES IN THE GRASS-LANDS. LECT. v. that he largely exercises this right, reclaiming part of the waste for himself by his personal dependants and adding it to whatever share may have belonged to him from the first in the cultivated land of the community, and colonising other portions of it with settlements of his villeins who are on their way to become copyholders. The legal theory has altogether departed from the primitive view ; the waste is now the lord's waste ; the commoners are for the most part assumed to have acquired their rights by sufferance of the lord, and there is a visible tendency in courts and text-writers to speak of the lord's rights, not only as superior to those of the commoners, but as being in fact of greater antiquity. When we pass from the waste to the grass lands which were intermediate between the common land and the cultivated area, we find many varieties in the degree of authority acquired by the lord. The customs of manors differ greatly on the point. Some- times, the lord encloses for his own benefit from Candlemas to Midsummer or Lammas, and the common right belongs during the rest of the year to a class of burgesses, or to the householders of a village, or to the persons inhabiting certain ancient tenements. Sometimes, the lord only regulates the inclosure, and determines the time of setting up and removing the fences. Sometimes, other persons en- LECT. v. THE FREE TENANTS. 137 close, and the lord has the grass when the several enjoyment comes to an end. Sometimes, his right of pasture extends to the baulks of turf which sepa- rate the common arable fields ; and probably there is no manorial right which in later times has been more bitterly resented than this, since it is practically fatal to the cultivation of green crops in the arable soil. Leaving the meadows and turning to the lands under regular tillage, we cannot doubt that the free holders of the Tenemental lands correspond in the main to the free heads of households composing the old village community. The assumption has often been made, and it appears to be borne out by the facts which can be established as to the common fields still open or comparatively lately enclosed. The tenure of a certain number of these fields is free- hold ; they are parcelled out, or may be shown to have been in the last century parcelled out, among many different owners ; they are nearly always distributed into three strips, and some of them are even at this hour cultivated according to methods of tillage which are stamped by their very rudeness as coming down from a remote antiquity. They appear to be the lands of a class which has never ceased to be free, and they are divided and cultivated exactly as the arable mark of a Teutonic township can be inferred, by a large induction, to have been divided and tilled. 138 SETTLEMENTS OF VILLEINS. LECT. v. But, on the other hand, many large tracts of inter- mixed land are still, or were till their recent enfran- chisement, copyhold of particular manors, and some of them are held by the intermediate tenure, known as customary freehold, which is confined by the legal theory to lands which once formed part of the King's Domain. I have not been able to ascertain the pro- portion of common lands held by these base tenures to freehold lands of the same kind, but there is no doubt that much commonable or intermixed land is found, which is not freehold. Since the descent of copyhold and customary freehold tenures from the holdings of servile classes appears to be well esta- blished, the frequent occurrence of intermixed lands of this nature seems to bear out the inference sug- gested by Sir H. Ellis's enumeration of the conditions of men referred to in Domesday Book, that, during the long process of feudalisation, some of the free villagers sank to the status, almost certainly not a uniform status, which was implied in villenage. (See also Mr. Freeman's remark, 4 Hist. Norm. Conq.' i. 97.) But evidence, supplied from quarters so wide apart as British India and the English settlements in North America, leads me to think that, at a time when a system of customary tillage widely prevailed, assem- blages of people planted on waste land would be likely to copy the system literally; and I conjecture that parts of the great wastes undoubtedly reclaimed by . THE MANORIAL COURTS. 139 the exercise of the right afterwards called the lord's ' right of approvement' were settled by servile colonies modelled on the ancient Teutonic township. The bond which kept the Manorial group together was evidently the Manorial Court, presided over by the lord or his representative. Under the name of Manorial Court three courts are usually included, which legal theory keeps apart, the Court Leet, the Court Baron, and the Customary Court of the Manor. I think there cannot be reasonable doubt of the le- gitimate descent of all three from the assembly of the Township. Besides the wide criminal and civil juris- diction which belonged to them, and which, though it has been partly abolished, has chiefly lost its impor- tance through insensible decay, they long continued in the exercise of administrative or regulative powers which are scarcely distinguishable from legislation. Other vestiges of powers exerted by the collective body of free owners at a time when the conceptions of legislative and judicial authority had not yet been separated, remained in the functions of the Leet Jury ; in the right asserted for the free tenants of sitting as Judges in the Court Baron ; and in the election of various petty officers. It is true that, as regards one of these Courts, the legal theory of its character is to a certain extent inconsistent with the pedigree I have claimed for it. The lawyers have always contended that the Court Leet only existed through the King's 140 THE MANOEIAL COUETS. LECT. v. grant, express or implied; and in pursuance of the same doctrine they have laid down that, whereas the lord might himself sit in the Court Baron, he must have a person of competent legal learning to repre- sent him in the Court Leet. But this only proves that the Court Leet, which was entrusted with the examination of the Frankpledge, had more public importance than the other Manorial Courts, and was therefore more distinctly brought under the assump- tion which had been gradually forming itself, that royal authority is the fountain of all justice. Even in the last extremity of decline, the Manorial Courts have not wholly ceased to be regarded as the tie which connects the common interests of a definite group of persons engaged in the cultivation of the soil. Marshall (' Rural Economy of Yorkshire/ i. 27) mentions the remarkable fact that these Courts were sometimes kept up at the beginning of the century by the voluntary consent of the neighbourhood in certain districts where, from the disappearance of the servile tenures which had enabled the Customary Courts to be continued, the right to hold them had been forfeited. The manorial group still sufficiently cohered for it to be felt that some common authority was required to regulate such matters as the repair of minor roads, the cleansing of rivulets, the ascertain- ment of the sufficiency of ring-fences, the assessment of the damages of impounded cattle, the removal of nuisances, and the stocking of commons. LECT. v. ENCROACHMENTS OP THE LORD. 141 On the whole, the comparison of the Village Group with the English group which I have called Manorial rather than Feudal, suggests the following general observations. Wherever that collective ownership of land which was a universal phenomenon in primitive f societies has dissolved, or gone far to dissolve, into individual property, the individual rights thus formed have been but slightly affected by the process of feu- dalisation. If there are reasons for thinking that some free village societies fell during the process into the predial condition of villenage whatever that condition may really have implied a compensating process began at some unknown date, under which the base tenant made a steady approach to the level of the freeholder. Even rights which savoured of the collective stage of property were maintained compara- tively intact, provided that they were ascertained: such as rights of pasture on the waste and rights of several or of common enjoyment (as the case might be) in the grass land. The encroachments of the lord were in proportion to the want of certainty in the rights of the community. Into the grass land he intruded more than into the arable land ; into the waste much more than into either. The conclusion j suggested to my mind is that, in succeeding to the / legislative power of the old community, he was/ enabled to appropriate to himself such of its rights as were not immediately valuable, and which, in the event of their becoming valuable, required legislative 142 ROMAX AND FEUDAL LAW. I,ECT. v. adjustment to settle the mode of enjoying them. Let me add that the general truth of my description of the character of the change which somehow took place, is perhaps rendered antecedently more probable by the comparison of a mature, but non-feudal, body of jurisprudence, like the Roman law, with any deeply 'feudalised legal system. You will remember the class of enjoyable objects which the Roman lawyers call res nullius, res publid usus, res omnium or univer- sorum ; these it reserves to the entire community, or confers on the first taker. But, under feudalised law, nearly all these objects which are capable of several enjoyment belong to the lord of the manor, or to the king. Even Prize of War, the most significant of the class, belongs theoretically to the sovereign in the first instance. By a very singular anomaly, which has had important practical results, Game is not strictly private property under English law ; but the doctrine on the subject is traceable to the later influence of the Roman law. There must be a considerable element of conjec- ture in any account which may be given of a series of changes which took place for the most part in remote antiquity, and which probably were far from uniform either in character or in rate of advance. It happens, however, that the vestiges of the earlier stages of the process of feudalisation are more dis- cernible in Germany than elsewhere, both in docu- I.ECT. v. CAUSES OP FEUDALISATION. 143 mentary records and on the face of the land ; owing in part no doubt to the comparatively feeble action of that superior and central authority which has obliterated or obscured so much in our own country, A whole school of writers, among whom Yon Maurer has the first place, has employed itself in restoring and interpreting these traces of _the_ Past. How did the Manor rise out of the Mark ? this is their way of stating the problem. What were the causes of indigenous growth which, independently of grants of land by royal or national authority, were leading to a suzerainty or superiority of one cultivating com- munity over another, or of one family over the rest of the families composing the village community ? The great cause in the view of these writers was the exceeding quarrelsomeness of these little societies, and the consequent frequency of intertribal war. One community conquers another, and the spoil of war is generally the common mark or waste of the worsted community. Either the conquerors appropriate and colonise part of the waste so taken, or they take the whole domain and restore it to be held in dependence on the victor-society. The change from one of these systems to another occurred, you will remember, in Roman history, and constitutes an epoch in the deve- lopment of the Roman Law of Property. The effect of the first system on the Teutonic communities was inequality of property ; since the common land appro- 144 GROWTH OP SUZERAINTIES. LECT. v. priated and occupied does not seem to have been equally divided, but a certain preference was given to the members of the successful community who had most effectually contributed to the victory. Under the second system, when its land was restored to the conquered society, the superiority over it which remained to the victor, bore the strongest analogy to a suzerainty or lordship. Such a suzerainty was not, however, exclusively created by success in war. Sometimes a community possessed of common land exceptionally extensive or exceptionally fertile would send colonies of families to parts of it. Each of these new communities would receive a new arable mark, but such of the land as remained unappropriated would still be the common land of all the townships. At the head of this sort of confederacy there would, however, be the original mother-community from which the colonists proceeded, and there seems no doubt that in such a state of things she claimed a supe- riority or suzerainty over all the younger townships. But, even if we had the fullest evidence of the growth of suzerainties in this inchoate shape, we should still have advanced a very little way in trac- ing the transmutation of the village system into the manorial system, if it were not for another phenome- non to which Landau has more particularly called attention. The Teutonic communities, though their organisation (if modern language must be employed) LECT. v. LEADING FAMILIES. 145 can only be described as democratic, appear neverthe- less to have generally had an abiding tradition that in some one family, or in some families, the blood which ran in the veins of all the freemen was purest ; probably because the direct descent of such family or families from a common ancestor was remembered or believed in. From the members of these families, the leader for a military expedition would as a rule be chosen ; but as in this stage of thought the different varieties of power were not distinguished from one another, the power acquired by the chieftain would be a combination of political, military, and judicial power. The choice of the leader would in great emergencies be a true election, but on less serious occasions would tend to become an acquiescence in the direction of the eldest male agnate of the family \ which had the primacy of the township. Similarly the power which had at first been more military than anything else, would in more peaceful times tend rather to assume a political and judicial form. The leader thus taken from the privileged family would have the largest share of the lands appropriated from conquered village -societies ; and there is ground for supposing that he was sometimes rewarded by aii exceptionally large share of the common land belong- ing to the society which he had headed. Everything in fact which disturbed the peaceful order of the village system led to the aggrandisement of the leading 146 ELEMENTS OF FEUDAL SYSTEM. LECT. v. family and of its chief. Among the privileges which he obtained was one of which the importance did not show itself till much later. He became powerful enough in his own township to sever his own plot of land from the rest, and, if he thought fit, to enclose it ; and thus to break up or enfeeble that system of common cultivation under rules of obligatory custom which depended mainly on the concurrence of all the villagers. There were therefore, in the cultivating communi- ties of the German and Scandinavian races', causes at work which were leading to inequality of property in land. There were causes at work which were leading to the establishment of superiorities or suze- rainties of one township over another. There were causes at work which tended to place the benefits of an unequal proprietary system and the enjoyment of these suzerainties in the hands of particular families, and consequently of their chiefs for the time being. Here you have all the elements of the system we are compelled to call feudal. But the system in its ultimate development was the result of a double set V- of influences. One set, which I have been describing s- $ere of primitive growth. Another showed them- selves when powerful Teutonic monarchies began to be formed, and consisted in grants of national waste land or of the soil of conquered provinces. Doubtless some of the grantees were chiefs of families already LECT. v. SYSTEMATIC FEUDALISM. 147 risen to power under indigenous Teutonic conditions; but in any case a Beneficiary would be a chieftain of a peculiarly powerful class. The cultivators of his land would either be persons settled on it by himself, or they would be vanquished provincials who had no rights which he did not choose to recognise or concede. It is not, therefore, surprising that there should have been a completer constitution of feudalism in the countries which at the time of conquest were filled with Romanised populations. The mould would be Teutonic, but the materials would be unusually plastic, and here would more especially come into play the influence of Roman law, giving precision to relations which under purely Teutonic social conditions may have been in a high degree vague and indefinite. It is well known that this systematic feudalism reacted upon the more purely Teutonic societies and gave an impulse to changes which were elsewhere proceeding at a slower pace. I have very briefly summarised the results of a very long and laborious enquiry, and only so far as is necessary for my immediate purpose. Merely remarking that I can see little or nothing in the conclusions of these eminent German writers which is out of harmony with the account given by English scholars of the parallel phenomena of change mani- fested in England before the Conquest, I proceed to ask, following the scheme of these Lectures, whether i, 2 148 ANTIQUARIANISM OF INDIAN POLITICS. LECT. v. the experience of Englishmen in India throws any light or has any bearing upon the questions which have been occupying us? It is not too much to say that the phenomena observed in the East, and those established in the West by historical research, illus- trate one another at every point. In India these dry bones live. Not only, as I have told you, is the Village Community the basis of British administration in those provinces in which the art of government has to be practised with skill and caution, but a number of controversies turning on the mode of transition from the village system to what I have called the manorial system are as earnestly, and some- times even as violently, debated by our countrymen in the East as are the great aspects of politics among ourselves. All Indian disputes take, I should explain, a historical or antiquarian shape. The assumption universally made is that the country must be governed in harmony with the established usages of the natives, and each administrative school has therefore to justify its opinions by showing that the principles to which it adheres are found in some sense or other to underlie the known customary law of India. The extrava- gance of partisanship which here shows itself in unqualified assertion of the universal applicability of general propositions has its Indian counterpart in unqualified assertion of the universal existence of particular customs. The Indian controversy is, how- LECT. v. POLITICAL KESULTS OF SETTLEMENTS. 149 ever, a controversy about facts which, though they are more complex than the disputants suppose, are nevertheless much simpler than the material of English political controversy ; and the results are therefore proportionately more instructive to the by- stander who has entire sympathy with neither party. Let us suppose a province annexed for the first time to the British Indian Empire. The first civil act of the new government is always to effect a settle- ment of the land revenue; that is, to determine the amount of that relatively large share of the produce of the soil, or of its value, which is demanded by the sovereign in all Oriental States, and out of which all the main expenses of government are defrayed. Among the many questions upon which a decision must be had, the one of most practical importance is, 4 Who shall be settled with ? ' with whom shall the settlement be made? What persons, what bodies, what groups, shall be held responsible to the British Government for its land revenue? What practically has to be determined is the unit of society for agrarian purposes; and you find that, in determining it, you determine everything, and give its character finally to the entire political and social constitution of the province. You are at once compelled to confer on the selected class, powers co-extensive with its duties to the sovereign. Not that the assumption is ever made that new proprietary powers are conferred on it, 150 VAKIOUS FORMS OF SETTLEMENT. LECT. v. but what are supposed to be its rights in relation to all other classes are defined ; and in the vague and floating order of primitive societies, the mere definition of a right immensely increases its strength. As a matter of fact, it is found that all agrarian rights, whether superior or subordinate to those of the person held responsible to Government, have a steady tendency to decay. I will not ask you to remember the technical names of the various classes of persons ' settled with ' in different parts of India Zemindars, Talukdars, Lumberdars names which doubtless sound uncouth, and which, in fact, have not an identical meaning throughout the country but I dwell on the fact that the various interests in the soil which these names symbolise are seen to grow at the expense of all others. Do you, on entering on the settlement of a new province, find that a peasant proprietary has been displaced by an oligarchy of vigorous usurpers, and do you think it expedient to take the government dues from the once oppressed yeomen? The result is the immediate decline, and consequently bitter dis- content, of the class above them, who find themselves sinking to the footing of mere annuitants on the land. Such was the land settlement of Oudh, which was shattered to pieces by the Sepoy mutiny of 1857, and which greatly affected its course. Do you, reversing this policy, arrange, that the superior holder shall be answerable to Government ? You find that you have LECT. v. GROWTH IN TOWER OF OFFICIAL HOLDER. 151 created a landed aristocracy which has no parallel in wealth or power except the proprietors of English soil. Of this nature is the more modern settlement of the province of Oudh, only recently consummated ; and such will ultimately be the position of the Talukdars, or Barons, among whom its soil has been divided. Do you adopt a policy different from either of those which I have indicated and make your ar- rangements with the representative of the village com- munity? You find that you have arrested a process of'Change which was steadily proceeding. You have 1 given to this peculiar proprietary group a vitality which it was losing, and a stiffness to the relations of the various classes composing it which they never had before. It would be a mere conceit to try to establish any close analogy between the Teutonic Kings and the British government of India. Yet, so much as this is true and instructive. The only owner of the soil of India with whom the English Government has any relations, is, in its eyes, a mere functionary. It chooses him where it pleases, and exacts from him services, chiefly pecuniary, but to a certain small extent personal. It is found, however, that when an official appointed by a powerful government acts upon the loose constitution of a primitive society he crushes down all other classes and exalts that to which he himself belongs. But for recent legislation this 152 MAHOMETAN ASSUMPTIONS. LECT. v. process would have gone to any length in India, and would have assuredly affected many other provinces than those which were its immediate theatre. It may, at least, be said that by observing it we gain a clearer conception of the effect of beneficiary gifts on the general tenure of land, and that we better understand the enormous power acquired by the chieftains who rendered immediate services to the Teutonic kings. The English in India appear to have started with the assumption of the Mahometans that the sovereign might lawfully select anybody he pleased as the collector of his revenue ; but they soon accepted the principle that the class to be ' settled with ' was the ] class best entitled to be regarded as having rights of property in the soil. At a later date they discovered "that, even when this class was determined, they had to decide what it was that proprietary rights over Indian land implied, and what powers they carried with them. No questions fuller of inherent diffi- culties were ever proposed for solution. As regards the first of them, the functionaries administering India might, with some eminent exceptions, but still not unfairly, be distributed into two great schools the partisans of the theory that the soil belongs to the peasantry either as individuals or as organised in groups ; and the partisans of the theory that owner- ship of the soil ought to be, and but for British in- fluence would be, everywhere in India vested in some sort of native aristocracy. As regards the second LECT. v. INDIAN SCHOOLS question, the Indian officials are much more exactly divided into those who contend that the highest right of property acknowledged to exist over the soil carries with it the same powers which attach to an English owner in fee-simple of the present day, and into those who are of opinion that, if these powers are to square with native idea and custom, they must be more or less limited and controlled. The controver- sies on these two points are the most vehemently de- bated of Indian disputes ; and none ever presented greater difficulties to the person who tries to form an opinion on their merits, not from his own knowledge but upon the evidence supplied to him by others. He finds men of the utmost experience, of trained power of observation, and of the most unquestionable good faith, stating precisely opposite conclusions with precisely equal positiveness. But if he avail himself of the advantage given him by the parallel facts of European tenure, he will, perhaps, venture to have an opinion, and to think that in these, as in many other fierce disputes, both sides are right and both sides are wrong. There is no doubt that the first point at issue was much obscured, and attention diverted to irrelevant matter, by the unlucky experiment tried at the end of the last century by Lord Cornwallis. A province, like Bengal Proper, where the village system had fallen to pieces of itself, was the proper field for the creation of a peasant proprietary ; but Lord Cornwallis 154 INDIAN FOKMS OF PEOPERTY. LECT. v. turned it into a country of great estates, and was compelled to take his landlords from the tax- gatherers of his worthless predecessors. The politi- cal valuelessness of the proprietary thus created, its failure to obtain any wholesome influence over the peasantry, and its oppression of all inferior holders, led not only to distrust of the economical principles im- plied in its establishment, but to a sort of reluctance to believe in the existence of any naturally privileged class in the provinces subsequently acquired and examined. The most distinguished public servants of that day have left much on record which implies an opinion that no ownership of Indian land was dis- coverable, except that of the village communities, subject to the dominion of the State. But in fact it appears that, of all the landmarks on the line of movement traced by German and English scholars from the Village group to the Manorial group, there is not one which may not be met with in India, saving always the extreme points at either end. I have riot had described to me any village community under the unmodified collective govern- ment of the heads of households, but there are those who think they find the vestiges of the original con- stitution in a sort of democratic spirit and habit of free criticism which prevail even when the govern- ment has passed to an hereditary officer. If any thoroughly authenticated example could be produced LECT. v. THE HEADMAN. 155 V^ of a community exercising absolute liberty of choice in electing its Headman, it would point still more significantly to an unmodified original equality; but the preference alleged to be invariably shown to the members of particular families appears to show that these elections belong really to the phenomena of hereditary succession. It is not, however, disputed that villages ara found in great numbers in which the government is lodged with a council, neither claiming to be nor regarded as being anything more than a representation of the entire cultivating body. The instances, however, in which the authority has passed to some particular family or families are extremely numerous. Sometimes the office of Head- man belongs absolutely to the head of a particular family ; sometimes it belongs to him primarily, but he may be set aside for incapacity or physical blemish; sometimes there is a power of choosing him limited to an election between the members of one or more privileged households . The powers which he enjoys or which it perhaps should be said, he would enjoy under native conditions of society are also very various. But the judicial power of mediating in disputes and of interpreting customs appears to be certainly vested in him, together with the duty of keeping order ; and, independently of the func- tions which he discharges with the consent of his neighbours, the British Government often expressly 156 PROPERTY RECOGNISED BY THE ENGLISH. LECT. v. confides to him a certain amount of regular jurisdic- tion and of regular authority in matters of police. There is no question that many of the families whom the English have recognised as owners of villages were privileged families enjoying the primacy of the township ; but the widest difference of opinion has prevailed as to the nature and origin of the rights claimed by certain families for their chiefs over whole tracts of country, embracing the domain of several village communities. It has been strongly contended on one side that these great proprietors are nothing but the descendants of farmers of the revenue under Native Governments ; on the other it is asserted that in some cases at all events they were Chieftains of Clans who were selected by preference to represent the Koyal or Imperial native government in districts in which they had an hereditary influence. There appears to me reasonable evidence that this last theory is true of certain localities in India. Clan society is also in Europe the Celtic form of the family organisation of society; and, for myself, I have great difficulty in conceiving the origin of customary law otherwise than by assuming the former existence of larger groups, under patriarchal chieftains, which at a later date dissolved into the independent collec- tions of families forming the cultivating commu- nities of the Teutonic (including the Scandinavian) races and of the Hindoos. If it be taken for granted that the English in India LECT. v. ABSOLUTE OWNERSHIP. 157 were bound to recognise rights of property some- where, their selection of the persons in whom these rights should vest does not seem to have been as absurd as the adherents of one Indian school are in the habit of hinting, if not of asserting. Claims to some sort of superior right over land in fact existed which corresponded to every single stage through which the conception of proprietorship has passed in the Western world, excepting only the later stages. The variety of these claims was practically infinite, and not only did not diminish, but greatly increased, as native customs and ideas were more accurately examined. Even when the village com- munities were allowed to be in some sense the pro- prietors of the land which they tilled, they proved on careful inspection not to be simple groups, but highly composite bodies, composed of several sections with conflicting and occasionally with irreconcilable claims. The English officials solved a problem of almost hopeless perplexity by registering all the owners of ,1 superior rights as landowners, their conception of ownership being roughly taken from their own country ; but the fundamental question very soon revived under another form in the shape of the second issue disputed between the Indian administra- tive schools, which is, whether proprietorship in India is to be taken to be the same assemblage of powers which constitutes the modern English owner- ship of land in fee -simple. 158 NATURE OF RIGHTS OF PROPERTY. LECT. v. It seems to me that the error of the school which asserts the existence of strong proprietary rights in India lies much less in merely making this assertion than in assuming the existence of a perfect analogy between rights of property as understood in India and as understood in this country. The presumption is strongly against the reality of any such correspon- dence. The rights of property are, in the eye of the jurist, a bundle of powers, capable of being mentally contemplated apart from one another and capable of being separately enjoyed. The historical enquirer can also, whenever there are materials for a history of the past, trace the gradual growth of the conception of absolute property in land. That conception appears me, for reasons which I shall afterwards assign, to / have grown out of the ownership of the lord in that / portion of his domain which he cultivated by his im- mediate personal dependants, and therefore to be a late and gradually matured fruit of the feudalisation of ^Europe. A process closely resembling feudalisation was undoubtedly once at work in India ; there are Indian phenomena answering to the phenomena of nascent absolute ownership in England and Europe ; but then these Indian phenomena, instead of succeeding one another, are all found existing together at the present moment. The feudalisation of India, if so it may be called, was never in fact completed. The character- istic signs of its consummation are wanting. It may LECT. v. DEVELOPMENT OF ABSOLUTE OWNERSHIP. 159 be doubted whether in any single instance the whole power of regulating the affairs of the village com- t , munity had passed to an hereditary official when the English entered the country ; on the other hand, in the enormous majority of examples there are pecu- liarities of organisation which show conclusively that the village-group is either unmodified or has not yet nearly passed into the manorial group. Even, how- ever, were we at liberty to believe that India has been completely feudalised, we should still be as far as possible from being entitled to assume that the high- est Indian form of ownership corresponds to the ab- solute ownership of the English holder in fee -simple. It has been said that many persons talk and write as if all the Englishmen who lived between the Norman Conquest and the Reformation lived at exactly the same time ; but this Indian assumption implies that there has been no change in our conception of landed property between the epoch at which England be- came completely feudal and the epoch (let us say) at which the Corn -laws were repealed. Yet during all these centuries England has been legislatively and to a great extent judicially centralised, and has been acted on by economical influences of very great uni- formity. India, from the earliest ages till the British entered it, was under the dominion of comparatively powerful kings, who swept away the produce of the labour of the village communities and carried off the 160 VESTED RIGHTS IN INDIA. JLECT. v. young men to serve in their wars, but did not other- wise meddle with the cultivating societies. This was doubtless the great cause of their irregular develop- ment. Intertribal wars soon gave way to the wars of great kings leading mercenary armies, but these monarchs, with few and doubtful exceptions, neither legislated nor centralised. The village communities were left to modify themselves separately in their own way. This subject is one of much practical importance, and I propose to treat of the more difficult problems which it raises in the next Lecture ; at present I will content myself with repeating that there seems to me the heaviest presumption against the existence in any part of India of a form of ownership conferring the exact rights on the proprietor which are given by the present English ownership in fee-simple. There are now, however, a vast number of vested rights in the country, fully recognised by the English Govern- ment, which assume the identity of Indian and English proprietorship, and neither justice nor policy permits them to be disturbed. Moreover it is ab- stractedly possible that further observation of par- ticular localities by accurate observers may, so far as regards those localities, rebut the presumption of which I have spoken, provided that the enquirer be acquainted with the parallel phenomena which belong to European legal history, and provided that he possess LECT. v. THE FEUDALISATION OF EUROPE. 161 the faculty, not very common among us, of distin- guishing the rudimentary stages of legal thought from its maturity. The way in which, among the unlet- tered members of a primitive society, law and morality run into one another ought especially to be studied. The subordinate holder who in India states that the superior holder has the power to do a certain act, but that he ought not to do it, does not make an admis- sion ; he raises a question of the utmost difficulty. It has been usual to speak of the feudalisation of Western Europe as if it had been an unmixed evil, and there is but too much reason to believe that it was accompanied in its course by a great amount of human suffering. But there are some facts of Indian experience which may lead us to think that the advantage of some of the economical and juridical results which it produced has been underrated. If the process indeed had really consisted, as some of the enthusiasts for its repetition in India appear to suppose that it did, merely in the superposition of the lord over the free owners of land, with power to demand such services or dues as he pleased and to vary his demands at pleasure, very little indeed could be said for it. But this picture of it is cer- tainly untrue of our own country. We are not at liberty to assume that the obligations incurred by the free owner of land who commended himself to a lord were other than, within certain limits, fixed and M 162 CULTIVATION OF WASTE-LAND. LECT. v. definite services ; and the one distinguishing charac- teristic which the English feudists discover in that free Socage tenure for which the English villagers most probably exchanged their allodial ownership is certainty, regularity and permanence of service. The great novelties which the transition from one form of property to another produced were, the new authority over the waste which the lord acquired (and which was connected with the transfer to him of the half judicial, half legislative, powers of the collective community) and the emancipation of the lord within his own domains from the fetters of obligatory agri- cultural custom. Now Europe was then full of great wastes, and the urgent business in hand was to reclaim them. Large forests were to be felled, and wide tracts of untilled land had to be brought under cultivation. In England, inexorably confined within natural boundaries, there pressed with increasing force the necessity for adopting the methods of agriculture which were fitted to augment the total supply of food for a growing population. But for this work society organised in village communities is but little adapted. The Indian administrators who regard the cultivating groups with most favour, contend that they secure a large amount of comfort and happiness for the families included within them, that their industry is generally, and that their skill is occasionally, meritorious. But their admirers certainly do not claim for them that LECT. v. IMPROVEMENTS IN TILLAGE. 163 they readily adopt new crops and new modes of tillage, and it is often admitted that they are grudging and improvident owners of their waste land. The British Government, as I before stated, has applied a remedy to this last defect by acting on the right to curtail excessive wastes which it inherited from its prede- cessors; and of late years it has done its utmost to extend and improve the cultivation of one great staple, Cotton amid difficulties which seem to be very imperfectly understood by those who suppose that in order to obtain the sowing of a new crop, or the sowing of an old crop in a new way, from a peasant in bondage to hereditary custom, it is enough to prove to him that it is very likely to be profitable. There is Indian evidence that the forms of property imitated from modern English examples have a value of their own, when reclamation has to be conducted on a large scale, or novelties in agriculture have to be introduced. The Zemindars of Lower Bengal, the landed proprietary established by Lord Cornwallis, have the worst reputation as landlords, and appear to have frequently deserved it; but the grants of land originally made to them included great uncultivated tracts, and at the time when their power over subordinate holders was least limited they brought large areas of waste land under tillage by the colonies of peasants which they planted there. The pro- prietorship conferred on them has also much to do M 2 164 VILLAGE COMMUNITIES AND CUSTOMS. LECT. v. with the introduction into Lower Bengal, nearly alone among Indian provinces, of new and vast agricultural industries, which, if they had been placed under timely regulation (which unfortunately they were not) would have added as much to the comfort of the people as they have added to the wealth of the country. It appears therefore to me to be highly probable that the autocratically governed manorial group is better suited than the village group for bringing under cul- tivation a country in which waste lands are extensive. So also does it seem to me likely to have been at all times more tolerant of agricultural novelties. It is a serious error to suppose that the non-feudal forms of property which characterised the cultivating commu- nities had any real resemblance to the absolute property of our own day. The land was free only in the sense of being free from feudal services, but it- was enslaved to custom. An intricate net of usage bound down the allodial owner, as it now binds the Indian peasant, to a fixed routine of cultivation. It can hardly be said that in England or Germany these usages had ceased to exercise a deadening influence even within living memory, since very recent writers in both countries complain of the bad agriculture perpetuated by custom in the open common fields. The famous movement against Inclosures under the Tudor reigns was certainly in LECT. v. CUSTOMARY TILLAGE. 165 part provoked by inclosures of plots in the three common fields made with the intention of breaking the custom and extending the systematic cultivation of grasses ; and it is curious to fmd the witnesses examined before the Select Committee of 1844 using precisely the same language which was employed by the writers who in the sixteenth century took the unpopular side, and declaring that the value and produce of the intermixed lands might be very greatly increased if the owner, instead of having one plot in each field, had three plots thrown together in one field and dealt with them as he pleased. As I said before, it seems to me a plausible conjecture that our absolute form of property is really descended from the proprietorship of the lord in the domain which besides planting it with the settlements of ' unfree ' families he tilled, when it was close to his castle or manor-house, by his own dependants under his own eye. He was free from the agricultural customs which shackled those below him, and the services exacted from above were not of a kind to affect his management of the land which he kept in his hands. The English settlers on the New England coast did not, as I shall point out, at first adopt this form of property, but they did so very shortly, and we unquestionably owe to it such an achievement as the cultivation of the soil of North America. If, however, a society organised in groups on the , 166 SEEVILE DEPENDANTS OF VILLAGES. LECT. v. primitive model is ineffective for Production, so also if left to develop itself solely under primitive influ- ences it fails to secure any considerable improvement in Distribution. Although it is hardly possible to avoid speaking of the Western village groups as in one stage democratically governed, they were really oligarchies, as the Eastern communities always tend to become. These little societies had doubtless anciently a power of absorption, when men were of more value than land. But this they lose in time. There is plenty of evidence that, when Western Europe was undergoing feudalisation, it was full of enthralled classes ; and I imagine that the authority acquired by the feudal chief over the waste was much more of an advantage than the contrary to these classes, whom he planted largely there in colonies which have probably been sometimes mistaken for assemblages of originally free villagers. The status of the slave is always deplorable ; the status of the predial slave is often worse than that of the personal or household slave ; but the lowest depth of miserable subjection is reached when the person enthralled to the land is at the mercy of peasants, whether they exercise their powers singly or in communities. Whether the Indian village communities had wholly lost their capacity for the absorption of strangers when the British dominion began, is a LECT. v. TILLAGES CEASE TO ABSORB STRANGERS. 167 point on which I have heard several contradictory opinions ; but it is beyond doubt that the influence of the British Government, which in this respect is nothing more than the ordinary influence of settled authority, has tended steadily to turn the com- munities into close corporations. The definition of rights which it has effected through its various judicial agencies the process of law by which it punishes violations of right above all the money value which it has given to all rights by the security which it has established from one end of India to another have all helped to make the classes in possession of vested rights cling to them with daily increasing tenacity. To a certain small extent this indirect and unintended process of shutting the door to the acquisition of new communal rights has been counteracted by a rough rule introduced by the English, and lately engrafted on the written law, under which the cultivator of the soil who has been in possession of it for a period of years is in some parts of India protected against a few of the extreme powers which attach to ownership of the modern English type. But the rule is now in some discredit, and the sphere of its operation has of late been much curtailed. And my own opinion (which I shall state more at length in the next Lecture) is, that even if the utmost effect were given to it, it would not make up for some of the inequalities of distribution between 168 BASSE'S WORK. LECT. v. classes actually included in the village group which have made their way into it through the influence of economical ideas originating in the West. ^On the whole the conclusion which I have arrived at con- cerning the village communities is that, during.- the primitive struggle for existence they were expansive and elastic bodies, and these properties may be pejr- petuated in them for any time by bad government. But tolerably good government takes away their absorptive power by its indirect effectis, and~can ^only restore it by direct interposition. It was part of my design to append to these Lectures an epitome of the work in which Professor Nasse has attempted to connect the actual condition of landed property in much of England at the end of the last century as shown in the various publications of Marshall, with the early English forms of tenure and cultivation as known to us through the labours of English and German scholars. But I have aban- doned my intention on learning that Nasse's book is likely to be made generally accessible through an English translation. The undertaking is one which presents considerable difficulties. Nasse_ complains of the unusual scarcity olEigTisnrecolFds bearing on tenure and agricultural custom, but in this place we may note another class of difficulties having its source in those abundant technicalities of English i I real-property law which are so hard to read by any- LECT. v. THE STATUTE OF DEVISES. 169 body except the professional lawyer ; and yet another in the historical theory of their land law which almost all English lawyers have adopted, and which colours all English treatises and all the decisions of English Courts a theory which, it is not unjust to say, practically regards the manorial system as having no ascertainable antecedents, and all rights primd facie inconsistent with it as having established them- selves through prescription and by the sufferance of the lord. I may be allowed to say that the book in which Nasse has knotted together the two ends of the historical thread is a very extraordinary one to be written by a foreigner. Much of it deals with matter which can only be discussed appropriately in other departments of study ; but I may notice in this place one set of causes, of a purely juridical nature, which, besides those assigned by Nasse, tended in later times to throw small or yeomen properties into the hands of large landowners. The popular opinion much exaggerates the extent to which this accumu- lation of landed properties had proceeded before the great inclosures of the last century, but still it had gone some length, and undoubtedly one cause was the influence, not at first strongly felt, of the Statute of Devises. Each landed proprietor ultimately ac- quired the power within limits certainly, but very wide ones to create a private law for his own estate. The eiforts of English judges to introduce order into 170 RULES FOR CONSTRUING WILLS. LECT. v. this chaos made it rather worse ; for the expedient which they adopted for the purpose was to give a forced technical meaning to the popular language of testators. One large and complex branch of English law is still concerned with the rules for construing in a technical sense the loose popular expressions found in wills. Every estate, willed away by a tes- tator technically unlearned, was in danger of being burdened with a mass of conflicting rights and in- terests, for the most part never contemplated by the testator himself. There was only one way of insuring oneself against this consequence, and that was the employment of an expert to make the will ; but there is reason to believe that the wholesale employment of legal experts which is now one of the singularities of this country is of comparatively modern date, since it is one of the traditions of the English Bar, derived from the last generation of lawyers, that among the great sources of litigation were at one time wills made by village schoolmasters. Estates thus bur- dened could only be held by very rich men ; as they alone could provide and insure against the technical traps which abounded in the private law under which the land was held, or could render them innocuous by continued possession ending in a prescriptive title. It is impossible not to see that the practice of un- shackled devise tended to bring small estates into the market as unprofitable to the holders through the LECT. v. RESTRAINTS ON TESTAMENTARY POWER. 171 complication of interests in them, and at the same time tended to make them purchaseable by rich men only. The simple truth is that, if a system of small or peasant holdings is to continue, the power of testators must be severely restrained in order to produce sim- plicity in the law of the estate. It does not at all follow that the restrictions must be those of the Code Napoleon; but restrictions there must be, and I venture to think that a not unsatisfactory solution of the problem is to be found in the law by which the Indian Government has recently sought to control the power of will-making, which the early English judges either introduced into India or invested with proportions which had never belonged to it before. LECTURE VI. THE EAELY HISTORY OF PRICE AND RENT. CONTENTS. Structure of Village Communities ^Divisions of the Community Pro- perty within the Community Tradition as to Eights Exactions of Indian Sovereigns Indian Rent Difficulty of Question Anglo- Indian Ideas Customary and Competition Rents The Protected Tenants Indian and English Forms of Property True Character of Problem The Irish Clan Rack-Rent paid by Strangers Primitive Notion as to Price Early Measure of Price Basis of Political Economy The Market Markets and Neutrality Influence of Market Law Sentiments Adverse to Political Economy Primitive Com- mercial Principles Influence of Carrying Trade Price and Rent Market for Land in England New Information Required Village Communities in America. I,ECT. vi. STRUCTURE OF VILLAGE COMMUNITIES. 175 LECTURE VI. THE EARLY HISTORY OF PRICE AND RENT. * THE VILLAGE COMMUNITIES which are still found in the Eastern world, exhibit, at first sight, a much simpler structure than appears on close examination. At the outset they seem to be associations of kinsmen, united i by the assumption (doubtless, very vaguely con- j ceived) of a common lineage. Sometimes the com- * munity is unconnected with any exterior body, save by the shadowy bond of caste. Sometimes it ac- knowledges itself to belong to a larger group or clan. But in all cases the community is so organised as to be complete in itself. The end for which it exists is the tillage of the soil, and it contains within itself the means of following its occupation without help from outside. The brotherhood, besides the cultivating families who form the major part of the group, com- prises families hereditarily engaged in the humble arts which furnish the little society with articles of use and comfort. It includes a village watch and a village police, and there are organised authorities for 176 DIVISIONS OF THE COMMUNITY. LECT. vi. the settlement of disputes and the maintenance of civil order. But, when the Indian village communities are more carefully scrutinised, a more complex structure dis- closes itself. I told you that some dominant family oc- casionally claims a superiority over the whole brother- hood, and even over a number of separate villages, especially when the villagers form part of a larger aggregate, tribe or clan. But, besides this, the com- munity itself is found, on close observation, to exhibit divisions which run through its internal framework. Sometimes men of widely different castes, or Maho- metans and Hindoos, are found united in the same village group; but in such cases its artificial struc- ture is not disguised, and the sections of the commu- nity dwell in different parts of the inhabited area. But the most interesting division of the community though the one which creates most practical diffi- culty may be described as a division into several parallel social strata. There are, first, a certain num- ber of families who are traditionally said to be de- scended from the founder of the village ; and I may here repeat a statement made to me that the agricul- tural traditions of India, differing in this from the heroic traditions which furnish a subject to the great Sanscrit poems, imply that the occupation of the rich Indian plains was a process rather of colonisation than of conquest. Below these families, descended from LECT. vi. PROPERTY W1THIX THE COMMUNITY. 177 the originators of the colony, there are others, dis- tributed into well ascertained groups. The brother- hood, in fact, forms a sort of hierarchy, the degrees of , ? which are determined by the order in which the various sets of families were amalgamated with the community. The tradition is clear enough as to the succession of the groups and is probably the representa- tion of a fact. But the length of the intervals of time between each successive amalgamation, which is also sometimes given and which is always enormous, may be safely regarded as untrustworthy ; and, indeed, numbers count for nothing in the East. The relations of these component sections to one another have furnished Eastern statesmen with the / problem which, of all others, has perplexed them most. For it has been necessary to translate them into proprietary relations. The superiority of each group in the hierarchy to those below it bears un- doubtedly some analogy to superiority of ownership in the land which all alike cultivate. But the question has been, What is the superiority to carry with it when translated into a higher right of pro- I perty? What division is it to imply of the total produce of the village domain? What power is it to confer of dealing with the land itself ? A law of tenure and tenancy had in fact to be con- structed, not only outside but inside the cultivating group. 1/8 TRADITION AS TO RIGHTS. LECT. vr. It is easy to see that these questions were not of the kind on which traditions were likely to throw any considerable light. For traditions, as I before stated, though tenaciously preserved by organised primitive societies, are only thoroughly to be depended upon when there have been acts and practices correspond- ing to them. It is extremely likely that the tradi- tional respect of each group of families within the community for those above it did occasionally take some concrete form, but it is in the highest degree improbable that the various layers of the little society were connected by anything like the systematic pay- ment of rent. For what is it which in primitive states of society forces groups of men to submit to that amal- gamation of strangers with the brotherhood which seems at first forbidden by its very constitution ? It is the urgency of the struggle for existence a struggle in the West probably both with man and with nature in the East a struggle less with savage enemies than with nature, not indeed unkindly, but extraordinarily capricious, and difficult to subdue from her very exuberance. The utmost available supply of human labour at first merely extracts from the soil what is sufficient for the subsistence of the cultivating group, and thus it is the extreme value of new labour which condones the foreign origin of the new hands w^hich bring it. No doubt there comes a time when this process ceases, when the fictions which conceal it seem pin 7i LECT. vi. EXACTIONS OF INDIAN SOVMfj ^ 179 to die out, and when the village community becomes a close corporation. As soon as this point is reached there is no doubt that any new-comers would only be admitted on terms of paying money or rendering service for the use and occupation of land. But in India, at all events, another set of influences then came into play which have had the effect of making the vestiges of the payment of rent extremely faint and feeble. All Oriental sovereigns feed their courts and armies by an unusually large share of the produce of j the soil which their subjects tiU. The Indian mon- archs of whose practices we have any real knowledge took so much of the produce in the shape of land- revenue as to leave to the cultivating groups little more than the means of bare subsistence. There is no discernible difference in this respect between the Mahometan Emperors of Delhi, the Mahratta princes who were dividing the Mogul Empire between them when the English first appeared, or the still more modern Hindoo sectaries, called the Sikhs, from whom we conquered the Punjab. Such nobility as existed was supported not by rents but by assignments of the royal revenue; and the natural aristocracy of the country would have differed in little from the humbler classes but for these assignments, or for the money which stuck to their fingers as the tax-gatherers of the king. The fund out of which rent is provided N 2 180 INDIAN RENT. LECT. vr. is in fact a British creation the fruit of the peace which the British have kept and of the moderation of their fiscal demands. x It is sometimes said, in connection with this subject, that the idea of property in land is realised with extreme distinctness by the natives of India. The assertion is true, but has not the importance which it at first appears to possess. Between village commu- nity and village community, between total group and total group, the notion of an exclusive right to the domain is doubtless always present; and there are many striking stories current respecting the tenacity with which expelled communities preserve traditions of their ancient seat. But to convince himself that, as. regards the interior of the group, the notion of dependent tenures connecting one stratum with an- other are very imperfectly conceived, it is only neces- sary for an impartial person to read or listen to the contradictory statements made by keen observers of equal good faith. The problem of Indian Rent cannot be doubted to begone of great intrinsic difficulty. To see this, it need only be stated. The question is not one as to a custom, in the true sense of the word ; the fund out of which rent comes has not hitherto existed or has barely existed, and hence it has not been asserted on either side of the dispute that rent (as distinct from the Government revenue) was paid for the use or occupation of land before the LECT. vi. DIFFICULTY OF QUESTION. 181 establishment of the British Empire, or that, if it was paid, it bore any relation to the competition value of cultivable soil. Nor was it an enquiry as to a tra- dition, because the further you recede from the be- ginning of British rule the greater is your distance from the conditions under which the exaction of competition rent for land becomes conceivable. The true problem can only be stated by making an assump- tion contrary to the fact. Assume a market for land and assume the existence of the fund out of which rent comes what primitive ideas can be traced which point to the distribution of the fund in any particular way? Such is the question. It is on the whole, I think, to be regretted that the British Government allowed its servants to embark on such an enquiry. However desirable it may be to govern the natives of the country in harmony with their own ideas, the effect of attempting to grapple with a problem under such vague conditions has led to violent recoils of opinion and practice on a matter in which settled policy was pre-eminently counselled by justice and prudence ; and in this case it would have been better, I think, to abandon the historical mode of dealing with a practical question peculiar to the Indian government, to choose the social and economical prin- ciples on which it was intended to act, and to adhere to them until their political unsoundness was esta- blished. But to the student of legal history the ques- 182 ANGLO-INDIAN IDEAS. LECT. VT. tion is one of very considerable interest, and, however little suited it may be for the Council chamber, it may very excusably be handled in this place. When first, amid the general discredit of the ex- periment tried by Lord Cornwallis in Bengal Proper, the Indian administrators of fifty years or sixty years since began to recognise the village community as the true proprietary unit of the country, they had very soon to face the problem of rent. They in some cases recognised an ownership superior to that of the village itself ; though it is alleged by their critics that they did not recognise it as much as they ought to r have done. Within the village community they in all cases recognised a hierarchy of minor groups, distinguished in some way by the difference of their rights in the soil. Besides their observation of Indian phenomena, which was here (as I have explained) conducted under extraordinary difficulties, they had nothing to guide them to a conclusion except the En- glish forms of property in land ; and they probably accepted unreservedly from the lawyers of that day the belief that the system actually obtaining in Eng- land was not only the ancient system of the country but that it was semi-sacred. A further misleading influence was the phraseology already introduced by the Economists. Between customary rents and compe- tition rents they did not fail to distinguish, and would probably not have denied that, as a matter of fact, LECT. vi. CUSTOMARY AND COMPETITION RENTS. 183 customary rents were more common and, as a matter of recorded history, were more ancient than competi- tion rents. But still, misled by an error which has of late been very justly compared with a still more famous delusion of the Roman lawyers, they believed com- petition-rents to be, in some sense or other, more natural than customary rents, and to competition- rents only they gave the name^Rent, unqualified by an epithet. This peculiar and (as it seems tome) im- proper selection of a cardinal term is not probably of much importance in this country ; but few sufficiently instructed persons, who have followed recent Indian controversies, can have failed to observe that almost all the obscurities of mental apprehension which are implied in the use of Nature as a juridical terni clus- ter in India round the word, Rent. Still there was too much around the earliest Anglo-Indian observers which seemed inconsistent with (to say the least) the universal occurrence in India of the English relation between landlord and tenant-at-will for them to assume unhesitatingly that the absolute ownership of the soil was vested in some one class, and that the rest of the cultivating community were simply connected with the proprietary class by paying for the use of the land whatever the members of that class saw fit to demand. They did assume that the persons who were acknowledged to be entitled to have the highest rights in the soil, whether within the community or without 184 THE PROTECTED TENANTS. LECT. vi. it, bore a very close analogy to English landowners in fee simple. They further took for granted that the great mass of the cultivators were tenants -at- will of the English pattern. But they gave effect to their doubts of the correctness of these analogies by creating between landowner and tenant- at- will an intermediate class of protected, or, as they are called in the East, 4 occupancy ' tenants. When, under the government dispossessed by the British, any cultivator was shown to have held his land by himself or his ancestors for a certain space of time, he was declared to be entitled to a qualified protection against eviction and rack-rent. By a recent legislative enactment this principle has been generalised, and any cultivator who even under the British Government has been undisturbed by his landlord for the like period is invested, in some parts of India, with the same protection. But at first the rule, of which the origin is uncertain, was probably intended as a rough way of determining a class which in some sense or other was included within the village com- munity. The exact period of occupation selected was twelve years; the longest time during which it seems to have been thought safe to carry back into native society an enquiry upon legal evidence into a question of fact. On this rule the most vehement of controversies has arisen. It is strongly asserted by a school of observation and theory which has many adherents in LFCT. vi. INDIAN AND ENGLISH FORMS OF PROPERTY. 185 the present day that close examination of village communities does not show that mere lapse of time conferred any rights on one section of the group as against another. In Indian disputes, as in many others, the advantage is at first with destructive criticism, and, upon the evidence which I have seen, I am on the whole disposed to think that the school of which I am speaking is in the right. The errors into which it has fallen appear to me to begin at a subsequent point. Some of its adherents seem to think that a certain correspondence being assumed to exist between a certain Indian class and owners of land in England, and a certain correspondence being further assumed between another Indian class and English tenants, the inference inevitably follows that the correspondence must be so close as to imply all the incidents of the English relation of landlord and tenant-at-will. But the Indian forms of property in ^ land are founded on the Village Group as the proprie- tary unit ; the English forms are based partly on the Manorial Group and partly on a state of things produced by its disintegration systems historically so wide apart can hardly be used even to illustrate one another. There are other adherents of the same opinion who, conscious perhaps of the true difficulty, attempt to get over it by asking the peasants belong- ing to the village community what their customs are as to eviction, rack-rent, and the relation of landlord 186 TRUE CHARACTER OF PROBLEM. LECT. vi. and tenant. Now, if there were the faintest reason for supposing that there ever existed in India an open market for land and a system of competition- rents, such an enquiry would be of great importance, for unquestionably cultivating village groups are highly retentive of tradition. But, eviction being admitted to have been rarely (if ever) practised, and it being allowed that rent was never paid for the use of land or (if paid) was not paid on any scale which indicated its principle, to ask a peasant whether a given class of tenants ought or ought not to be subject to rack-rent and eviction is to put to a very ignorant man a question at once extremely complex, extremely ambiguous, and only capable of being answered (so far as it can be answered at all) after a careful examination of the parallel phenomena of many different ancient systems of law. The reference to the peasantry is doubtless honestly made, but it is an appeal to the least competent of tribunals. The question, What vestiges remain of ancient ideas as to the circumstances under which the highest ob- tainable rent should be demanded for the use of land, is of some interest to the student of legal antiquities ; although even in this place it is not a question which can be very confidently answered. The most distinct ancient rule which I have discovered occurs in the first of the official volumes containing the version of the Ancient Laws of Ireland published by the Irish LECT. vi. THE IRISH CLAX. 187 Government. ' The three rents/ it says, 4 are rack- rent, from a person of a strange tribe a fair rent, : from one of the tribe and the stipulated rent, which is paid equally by the tribe and the strange tribe/ (Senchus Mor, p. 159.) This very much expresses the conclusion on the subject which I have arrived at upon the less direct evidence derived from a variety of quarters. The Irish clan was apparently a group much more exten- sive and of much looser structure than the Eastern or Western village community ; it appears even to have embraced persons who cannot be distinguished from slaves. Yet from none of these (apart from express agreement) could any rent be required but a rent fair according to received ideas, or, in other words, a customary rent. It was only when a person totally unconnected with the clan by any of those fictions explaining its miscellaneous composition which were doubtless adopted by this (as by all other) primi- tive groups when such a person came asking for leave to occupy land, that the best bargain could be made with him to which he could be got to submit. ' Rack-rent ' is sometimes used as a dyslogistic ex- pression for an extreme competition -rent ; but you will see that ideas associated with competition-rents in the economical sense have no relation whatever to such a transaction. In a primitive society the person who submits to extreme terms from one group is 188 BACK-KENT PAID BY STRANGERS. LECT. vi. pretty sure to be an outcast thrown on the world by the breaking up and dispersion of some other group, and the effect of giving him land on these terms is not to bring him under the description of a tenant as understood by the Economists, but to reduce him to a condition resembling predial servitude. I need hardly add that, in stating what seem to me the circumstances under which a rack-rent could be de- manded according to primitive ideas, I am merely drawing an antiquarian inference, and expressing no opinion whatever on the political expediency or other- wise of limiting the claim of a landlord to rent. The enquiry into these primitive ideas may also be conducted by another route, which I will follow for a brief space on account of some curious collateral questions which it opens. Let me begin by saying that the remains of ancient Roman law forcibly suggest that in ancient times transfers of the pos- session of land were extremely rare. The formalities which accompanied them were of extraordinary cum- brousness, and these formalities had to be strictly observed not only in transactions which we should call Conveyances, but also in the transactions which at a later date were styled Contracts. The ancient law further gives reason to think that the letting and hiring of movable property for a consideration was unknown or uncommon. The oldest Roman contracts systematically treated of are the Real Contracts, and LECT. vi. PRIMITIVE NOTIONS AS TO PRICE. 189 to this class belongs Loan; but the loans there spoken of are gratuitous, and the rules laid down grew probably out of the practice of lending from house to house the small articles of movable property in use among a primitive people. There is some inte- I rest in observing the plentifulness of these rules in a system so comparatively mature as Eoman law when contrasted with their scantiness in English jurisprudence. The explanation seems to be that the abundant manufacture nowadays of all articles of personal property causes them to be much oftener owned than lent, so that minute rules on the subject of gratuitous loans become superfluous. It would almost certainly be labour wasted to search among the records of ancient law for any trace of the ideas which we associate with competition- rents. But if land in primitive times was very rarely sold or (in our sense) rented, and if movable pro- ... perty was very rarely hired for money, it is at least probable that from a very early date movables were purchased. It does not appear to me quite an hope- less undertaking to trace the gradual development of the notions connected with Price ; and here, if at all, we shall be able to follow the early history of bargaining or competition. Nor, if we can discover any primitive ideas on the point, need we hesitate to aiisfer them from the sale of movables to the com- : H1 tition-rent of land. The Roman lawyers remark 100 EARLY MEASURE OF PRICE. LECT. vi. of the two contracts called Emptio Venditio, or Sale for Price, and Locatio Conductio, or Hiring for Con- sideration, that they are substantially the same, and that the rules which govern one may be applied to the other. The observation seems to me not only true, but one which it is important to keep in mind. You cannot indeed without forcing language speak of the Contract of Sale in terms of the Contract of Letting and Hiring; but the converse is easy, and there is no incorrectness in speaking of the Letting and Hiring of Land as a Sale for a period of time, with the price spread over that period. I must con- fess I could wish that in some famous books this simple truth had been kept in view. It has several times occurred to me, in reading treatises on Political Economy, that if the writer had always recollected that a competition-rent is after all nothing but price payable by instalments, much unnecessarily mys- terious language might have been spared and some (to say the least) doubtful theories as to the origin of rent might have been avoided. The value of this impression anybody can verify for himself. What, in a primitive society, is the measure of Price ? It can only be called Custom. Although in the East influences destructive of the primitive notion are actively at work, yet in the more retired villages the artificer who plies an ancient trade still sells his wares for the customary prices, and would always LECT. vi. BASIS OF POLITICAL ECONOMY. 191 change their quality rather than their price a prefer- ence, I must remark, which has now and then ex- posed the natives of India to imputations of fraud not wholly deserved. And in the West, even in our own country, there are traces of the same strong feeling that price should be determined by Custom in the long series of royal, parliamentary, and municipal attempts to fix prices by tariff. Such attempts are justly condemned as false political economy, but it is sometimes forgotten that false political economy may be very instructive history. What, then, is the origin of the proposition on which the whole of the great deductive science of Political Economy is based ? No good political econo- mist asserts that, as matter of fact, everybody asks for his saleable commodities the highest obtainable price ; still less does he assert that everybody ought to ask it. What he lays down is that the practice of asking it is sufficiently general to make it safe for practical purposes to treat it as universal. When, however, we are discussing the ideas of very primitive societies, it is extremely difficult to draw the line between law, morality, and fact. It is of the very essence of Custom, and this indeed chiefly explains its strength, that men do not clearly distinguish between their actions and their duties what they ought to do what they always have done, and they do it. What, then, is the origin of the rule that a man 192 THE MARKET. LECT. vr. may ask or, if you choose so to put it, that he does ask the highest available price for the wares which ,,he has to sell? I think that it is in the beginning a Rule of the Market, and that it has come to prevail 'in proportion to the spread of ideas originating in the Market. This indeed would be a proposition of little value, if I did not go farther. You are well aware that the fundamental proposition of Political economy is often put as the rule of buying in the cheapest market and selling in the dearest. But since the primitive period the character of markets has changed almost as much as that of society itself. In order to understand what a market originally was, you must try to picture to yourselves a territory occupied by village communities, self-acting and as yet autonomous, each cultivating its arable land in the middle of its waste, and each, I fear I must add, at perpetual war with its neighbour. But at several points, points probably where the domains of two or three villages converged, there appear to have been spaces of what we should now call neutral ground. These were the Markets. They were probably the only places at which the members of the different pri- mitive groups met for any purpose except warfare, and the persons who came to them were doubtless at first persons specially empowered to exchange the produce and manufactures of one little village community for those of another. Sir John Lubbock in his recent LECT. vr. MARKETS AND NEUTRALITY. 193 volume on the 4 Origin of Civilisation,' has some interesting remarks on the traces which remain of the very ancient association between Markets and Neutrality (p. 205) ; nor though I have not now an opportunity of following up the train of thought can I help observing that there is an historical connection of the utmost importance to the moderns between the two, since the Jus Gentium of the Roman Praetor, which was in part originally a Market Law, is the undoubted parent of our In- ternational Law. But, besides the notion of neu- trality, another idea was anciently associated with markets. This was the idea of sharp practice and hard bargaining. The three ideas seem all blended in the attributes of the god Hermes or Mercury at once the god of boundaries, the prince of messengers or ambassadors, and the patron of trade, of cheating, and of thieves. The Market was then the space of neutral ground in which, under the ancient constitution of society, the members of the different autonomous proprietary groups met in safety and bought and sold unshackled by customary rule. Here, it seems to me, the notion of a man's right to get the best prica for his wares took its rise, and hence it spread over the world. Market Law, I should here observe, has had a great fortune in legal history. The Jus Gentium of the Romans, though doubtless intended o 194 INFLUENCE OF MARKET LAW. LECT. vi. in part to adjust the relations of Roman citizens to a subject population, grew also in part out of commer- cial exigencies, and the Roman Jus Gentium was gradually sublimated into a moral theory which, among theories not laying claim to religious sanction, had no rival in the world till the ethical doctrines of Bentham made their appearance. If, however, I could venture to detain you with a discussion on technical law, I could easily prove that Market Law has long exercised and still exercises a dissolving and trans- forming influence over the very class of rules which are profoundly modifying the more rigid and archaic branches of jurisprudence. The Law of Personal or Movable Property tends to absorb the Law of Land or of Immovable Property, but the Law of Movable Property tends steadily to assimilate itself to the Law of the Market. The wish to establish as law that which is commercially expedient is plainly visible in the recent decisions of English courts of justice ; a whole group of legal maxims having their origin in the law of the market (of which the rule of caveat emptor is the most significant) are growing at the ex- pense of all others which compete with them; and there is a steady tendency in English legislation to engraft new rules, as from time to time they are developed by traders, upon the commercial law of England. Finally, the most recent of Indian disputes is whether native opinion admits of including in the Civil Code of the country the rule that a man who in good faith LECT. vi. SENTIMENTS ADVERSE TO POLITICAL ECONOMY. 195 has purchased goods of another shall have them, though the seller had really no title to them and though the owner claim them. This is in reality an extreme rule of Market Law, and it is often described in fact as the rule of Market Overt, since it only obtains in England where that description of market exists. Political Economists often complain of the vague moral sentiments which obstruct the complete recep- tion of their principles. It seems to me that the half- conscious repulsions which men feel to doctrines which they do not deny might often be examined with more profit than is usually supposed. They will sometimes be found to be the reflection of an older order of ideas. Much of moral opinion is no doubt in advance of law, for it is the fruit of religious or philo- sophical theories having a different origin from law and not yet incorporated with it. But a good deal of it seems to me to preserve rules of conduct which, though expelled from law, linger in sentiment or practice. The repeal of the Usury Laws has made it lawful to take any rate of interest for money, yet the taking of usurious interest is not thought to be respectable, and our Courts of Equity have evidently great difficulty in bringing themselves to a complete recognition of the new principle. Bearing this exam- ple in mind, you may not think it an idle question if I ask, What is the real origin of the feeling that it is not creditable to drive a hard bargain with a near o 2 196 PRIMITIVE COMMERCIAL PRINCIPLES. LECT. vi. relative or a friend ? It can hardly be said that there is any rule of morality to forbid it. The feeling seems to me to bear the traces of the old notion that men united in natural groups do not deal with one another on principles of trade. The only natural group in which men are now joined is the family ; and the only bond of union resembling that of the family is that which men create for themselves by friendship. It is stated that there is the strongest repulsion among the natives of India to that extreme rule of Market Law which I described to you as proposed to be engrafted on the civil code. The point is doubtful on the evidence, but, considering the prevalence and vitality of organised natural groups in India, the a priori presumption is certainly in favour of the existence of the alleged repugnance. All indications seem to me therefore to point to the same conclusion. Men united in those groups out of which modern society has grown do not trade together on what I may call for shortness commercial prin- ciples. The general proposition which is the basis of Political Economy, made its first approach to truth under the only circumstances which admitted of men meeting at arm's length, not as members of the same group, but as strangers. Gradually the assumption of the right to get the best price has penetrated into the interior of these groups, but it is never completely received so long as the bond of connection between LECT. vi. INFLUENCE OF CARRYING TRADE. 197 man and man is assumed to be that of family or clan- connection. The rule only triumphs when the primi- tive community is in ruins. What are the causes which have generalised a Rule of the Market until it has been supposed to express an original and funda- mental tendency of human nature, it is impossible to state fully, so multifarious have they been. Every- thing which has helped to convert society into a col- lection of individuals from being an assemblage of families, has helped to add to the truth of the assertion made of human nature by the Political Economists. One cause may be assigned, after observation of the East, in the substitution of caravan or carrying trade for the frequentation of markets. When the first system grows up, the merchant, often to some extent invested with the privileges of an ambassador, carries his goods from the place of production, stores them in local entrep6ts, and sells them on the principles of the Market. You will here call to mind the curious fact, stated to me on high authority, that the Grain-Dealer, though a man of great consequence and wealth, is often excluded in India from village or municipal privileges to which the small tradesmen whose busi- ness is an ancient appendage of the community are freely admitted. I am also informed that the natives of India will often pay willingly a competition price for one article, when they would think it unjust to be asked more than a customary price for another. A 198 PRICE AND KENT. LECT. vi. man who will pay the price of the day for corn col- lected from all parts of India, or for cotton- cloth from England, will complain (so I am told) if he is asked an unaccustomed price for a shoe. If the notion of getting the best price for movable property has only crept to reception by insensible steps, it is all but certain that the idea of taking the highest obtainable rent for land is relatively of very modern origin. The rent of land corresponds to the price of goods, but doubtless was infinitely slower in conforming to economical law, since the impression of a brotherhood in the ownership of land still survived when goods had long since become the subject of individual property. So strong is the presumption against the existence of competition rents in a country peopled by village communities that it would require the very clearest evidence to con- vince me that they were anywhere found under native conditions of society, but the evidence (as I told you) is remarkably unconvincing. I of course admit that certain classes of people are so slightly connected with the village community that, under the new conditions introduced into India by the English, their rents would probably have become competition rents. The problem, however, presented by these classes is not antiquarian but political. It is identical with that terrible problem of pauperism which began to press on English statesmen as soon LECT. vr. MARKET FOR LAND IN ENGLAND. 199 as the old English cultivating groups began distinctly to fall to pieces. In India the solution will be far more difficult than it has proved here, since the country has little mineral fuel and can have no manufactures on a scale to occupy a large surplus population; and emigration for the most part is regarded as mortal sin. The right to take the highest obtainable rent for land is, as a matter of fact and as a matter of morality, a right derived from a rule of the market. Both the explanation and the justification of the exercise of the right in England and Scotland is that in these countries there really is a market for land. Yet it is notorious that, in England at all events, land is not universally rackrented. But where is it that the theoretical right is not exercised? It is substantially true that, where the manorial groups substituted for the old village groups survive, there are no rackrents. What is sometimes called the feudal feeling has much in common with the old feeling of brotherhood which forbade hard bargains, though like much else it has passed from the collective community to the modern representative of its auto-^ cratic chieftain. Even in England the archaic rules I have been describing have not yet quite lost their authority. Here I conclude the Lectures of the Term. Their chief object, as I have repeatedly stated, has been to 200 NEW INFORMATION REQUIRED. LECT. vi. establish a connection between the results of Indian experience and observation and the conclusions arrived at by German and English learning. But another purpose will have been served if some of those who have attended here are induced to help in adding to our knowledge of ancient English tenures. In spite of the information collected by the Select Committee of 1844, we know far too little of Com- mon and Commonable fields, of Lammas lands, Common meadows, and limited rights over Wastes, and generally of manorial customs. Yet forms of property, savouring of the old collective enjoy- ment, seem to occur so frequently that almost any- body has the opportunity of collecting facts which may have an important bearing on our enquiry. The speculative interest of the subject I need scarcely enlarge upon, but these ancient joint-holdings have a farther interest as constituting not only some of the oldest, but some of the most lasting phenomena of English history. It is a striking remark of Nasse that the English common field system bears the marks of an exotic origin. In the time of the ruder agri- culture which has now given way to scientific tillage, the natural fitness of the soil of England was for grass farming, and the tendency to resort to it as the most profitable form of cultivation was apparently irresis- tible, and out of it grew some very serious agrarian movements. The three-field system was therefore brought by our Teutonic ancestors from some drier LECT. vi. VILLAGE-COMMUNITIES IN AMERICA. 201 region of the Continent. It is a very remarkable fact that the earliest English emigrants to North America who, you know, belonged principally to the class of yeomanry organised themselves at first in village -communities for purposes of cultivation. When a town was organised, the process was that ' the General Court granted a tract of land to a com- pany of persons. The land was first held by the company as property in common/ (Palfrey, ; History of New England/ ii. 13.) An American commentator on this passage adds : ' The company of proprietors proceeded to divide the land by assigning first house- lots (in Marlborough from fifteen to twenty acres), then tracts of meadow land, and in some cases mineral land, i.e. where bog-iron ore was found. Pasture and woodland remained in common as the property of the company, but a law of the General Court in 1660 provided that "hereafter no cottage or dwelling-house be admitted to the privilege of commonage for wood, timber, or herbage but such as are already in being, or shall be erected with the consent of the town." From that time the com- moners appear as a kind of aristocracy, and the commons were gradually divided up. 7 This is not only a tolerably exact account of the ancient Euro- pean and existing Indian village -community, but it is also a history of its natural development, where the causes which turn it into a manorial group are absent, and of its ultimate dissolution. APPENDICES. :*" APPENDIX I. 1 MINUTE EECOKDED ON OCTOBER 1, 1868. THE first conclusion which I draw (from a Paper * showing in each case the authority at whose suggestion the Acts of the Governor-General in Council, from No. I. of 1865, to No. XXXVIII. of 1867, were passed') is, that next to no legislation originates with the Supreme Government of India. The only exceptions to complete inaction in this respect which are worth mentioning, occur in the case of Taxing Acts though, as there is often much communi- cation with the Provincial Governments on the subject of these Acts, the exception is only partial and in that of a few Acts adapting portions of English Statute law to India. Former Indian Legislatures introduced into India certain modern English Statutes, limiting their operation to * cases governed by English law.' The most recent Eng- lish amendments of the Statutes were, however, not fol- lowed in this country until they were embodied in Indian Acts by my predecessor, Mr. Kitchie, and myself, in accord- ance with the general wish of the Bench and Bar of the High Courts. Examples of this sort of legislation are Acts XXVII. and XXVIII. of 1866, which only apply to cases governed by English law.' The second and much the most important in^eijference which the Paper appears to me to suggest is, that the great bulk of the legislation of the Supreme Council is 1 Vide p. 70. 206 APPENDIX I. attributable to its being the Local Legislature of many Indian Provinces. At the present moment, the Council of the Governor- General for making Laws and Regulations is the sole Local Legislature for the North-Western Pro- vinces, for the Punjab, for Oudh, for the Central Provinces, for British Burmah, for the petty Province of Coorg, and for many small patches of territory which are scattered among the Native States. Moreover, it necessarily divides the legislation of Bengal Proper, Madras, and Bombay with the local Councils of those Provinces. For, under the provisions of the High Court's Act of 1861, it is only the Supreme Legislature which can alter or abridge the jurisdiction of the High Courts, and as this jurisdiction is very wide and far-reaching, the effect is to throw on the Governor-General's Council no small amount of legislation which would naturally fall on the Local Legislatures. Occasionally, too, the convenience of having but one law for two Provinces, of which one has a Council and the other has none, induces the Supreme Government to legis- late for both, generally at the request of both their Govern- ments. Now these Provinces for which the Supreme Council is the joint or sole Legislature, exhibit very wide diversities. Some of these differences are owing to distinctions of race, others to differences of land-law, others to the unequal spread of education. Not only are the original diversities between the various populations of India believed nowa- days to be much greater than they were once thought to be, but it may be questioned whether, for the present at all events, they are not rather increasing than diminishing under the influence of British Government. That in- fluence has no doubt thrown all India more or less into a state of ferment and progress, but the rate of progress is very unequal and irregular. It is growing more and more difficult to bring the population of two or more Pro- APPENDIX I. 207 vinces under any one law, which goes closely home to their daily life and habits. Not only, then, are we the Local Legislature of a great many Provinces, in the sense of being the only authority which can legislate for them on all or certain subjects, but the condition of India is more and more forcing us to act as if we were a Local Legislature, of which the powers do not extend beyond the Province for which we are legisla- ting. The real proof, therefore, of our over-legislation would consist, not in showing that we pass between thirty and forty Acts in every year, but in demonstrating that we apply too many new laws to each or to some one of the Provinces subject to us. Now, I will take the most im- portant of the territories for which we are exclusively the Legislature the North- Western Provinces ; and I will take the year in which, judging from the Paper, there has been most North-Western legislation the year 1867. The amount does not seem to have been very great or serious. I find that in 1867, if Taxing Acts be excluded, the North- West was affected in common with all or other parts of India by an Act repressive of Public Gambling (No. III.) ; by an Act for the Registration of Printing Presses (No. XXY.) ; and by five Acts (IV., VII., VIII., X., and XXXIII.) ; having the most insignificant tech- nical objects. I find that it was exclusively affected by an Act (I.) empowering its Government to levy certain tolls on the Ganges ; by an Act (XXII.) for the Regula- tion of Native Inns ; by an Act (XVIII.) giving a legal constitution to the Courts already established in a single district, and by an Act (XXVIII.) confirming the sen- tences of certain petty Criminal Courts already existing. I find further that, in the same year, 1867, the English Parliament passed 85 Public General Acts applicable to England and Wales, of which one was the Representation of the People Act. The number of Local and Personal 208 APPENDIX I. Acts passed in the same year was 188. All this legisla- tion too came, it must be remembered, on the back of a vast mass of statute-law, compared with which all the written law of all India is the merest trifle. Now the population of England and Wales is rather over 20 mil- lions, that of the North- Western Provinces is supposed to be above 30 millions. No trustworthy comparison can be instituted between the two countries ; but, regard being had to their condition thirty years ago, it may be doubted whether, in respect of opinions, ideas, habits, and wants, there has not been more change during thirty years in the North- West than in England and Wales. A third inference which the Paper suggests is, that our legislation scarcely ever interferes, even in the minutest degree, with Private Eights, whether derived from usage or from express law. It has been said by a high authority that the Indian Legislature should confine itself to the amendment of Adjective Law, leaving Substantive Law to the Indian Law Commissioners. It is meant no doubt that the Indian Legislature should only occupy itself, proprio motu, with improvements in police, in administra- tion, in the mechanism and procedure of courts of justice. This proposition appears to me a very reasonable one in the main, but it is nearly an exact description of the character of our legislation. We do not meddle with Private Eights ; we only create Official Duties. No doubt Act X. of 1865 and Act XV. of 1866 do consider- ably modify Private Eights, but the first is a chapter and the last a section of the Civil Code framed in England by the Law Commissioners. The Paper does not of course express the urgency with which the measures which it names are pressed on us by their originators the Local Governments. My Colleagues are, I believe, aware that the earnestness with which these Governments demand legislation, as absolutely necessary APPENDIX I. 209 for the discharge of their duties to the people, is sometimes very remarkable. I am very far indeed from believing that, as they are now constituted, they think the Supreme Council precipitate in legislation. I could at this moment name half a dozen instances in which the present Lieutenant-Governors of Bengal and the North- West deem the hesitation of the Government of India in recommending particular enactments to the Legislature unnecessary and unjustifiable. While it does not seem to me open to doubt that the Government of India is entirely free from the charge of initiating legislation in too great abundance, it may nevertheless be said that we ought to oppose a firmer resistance to the demands of the Local Governments and other authorities for legislative measures. It seems desirable therefore that I should say something of the influences which prompt these Governments, and which constitute the causes of the increase in Indian legislation. I must premise that I do not propose to dwell on causes of great generality. Most people would admit that, for good or for evil, the country is changing rapidly, though not at uniform speed. Opinion, belief, usage, and taste are obviously undergoing more or less modification every- where. The standard of good government before the minds of officials is constantly shifting, perhaps it is rising. These phenomena are doubtless among the ultimate causes of legislation; but, unless more special causes are as- signed, the explanation will never be satisfactory to many minds. I will first specify a cause which is in itself of a merely formal nature, but which still contributes greatly for the time to the necessity for legislation. This is the effect of the Indian Councils' Act of 1861 upon the system which existed before that date in the Non-Regulation Provinces. It is well known that, in any strict sense of the word, the p 210 APPENDIX 1. Executive Government legislated for those Provinces up to 1861. The orders, instructions, circulars, and rules for the guidance of officers which it constantly issued, were, to a certain extent, essentially of a legislative character, but then they were scarcely ever in a legislative form. It is not matter of surprise that this should have been so, for the authority prescribing the rule immediately modified or explained it, if it gave rise to any inconvenience, or was found to be ambiguous. But the system (of which the legality had long been doubted) was destroyed by the Indian Councils' Act. No legislative power now exists in India which is not- derived from this Statute ; but to prevent a wholesale cancellation of essentially legislative rules, the 25th Section gave the force of law to all rules made previously for Non-Regulation provinces by or under the authority of the Government of India, or of a Lieute- nant-Governor. By this provision, an enormous and most miscellaneous mass of rules, clothed to a great extent in general and popular language, was suddenly established as law, and invested with solidity and un- changeableness to a degree which its authors had never contemplated. The difficulty of ascertaining what is law and what is not in the former Non-Regulation Provinces, is really incredible. I have, for instance, been seriously in doubt whether a particular clause of a Circular in- tended to prescribe a rule or to convey a sarcasm. The necessity for authoritatively declaring rules of this kind, for putting them into precise language, for amending them when their policy is doubted, or when tried by the severer judicial tests now applied to them, they give different results from those intended by their authors, is among the most imperative causes of legislation. Such legislation will, however, diminish as the process of simplifying and declaring these rules goes on, and must ultimately come to a close. APPENDIX I. 211 I now come to springs of legislation which appear to increase in activity rather than otherwise. First among these I do not hesitate to place the growing influence of courts of justice and of legal practitioners. Our Courts are becoming more careful of precise rule both at the top and at the bottom. The more careful legal education of the young civilians and of the younger Native judges, diffuses the habit of precision from below ; the High Courts, in the exercise of their powers of supervision, are more and more insisting on exactness from above. An even more powerful influence is the immense mul- tiplication of legal practitioners in the country. I am not now speaking of European practitioners, though their number has greatly increased of late, and though they penetrate much further into the Mofussil than of old. The great addition, however, is to the numbers and in- fluence of the native Bar. Practically a young educated Native, pretending to anything above a clerkship, adopts one of two occupations either he goes into the service of Government, or he joins the Native Bar. I am told, and I believe it to be true, that the Bar is getting to be more and more preferred to Government service by the educated youth of the country, both on the score of its gainfulness and on the score of its independence. Now the law of India is at present, and probably will long continue to be, in a state which furnishes opportunity for the suggestion of doubts almost without limit. The older written law of India (the Regulations and earlier Acts) is declared in language which, judged by modern requirements, must be called popular. The authoritative Native treatises on law are so vague that, from many of the dicta embodied by them, almost any conclusion can be drawn. More than that, there are, as the Indian Law Commissioners have pointed out, vast gaps and interspaces in the Substantive Law of India; there are subjects on p 2 212 APPENDIX I. which no rules exist, and the rules actually applied by the Courts are taken, a good deal at haphazard, from popular text-books of English law. Such a condition of things is a mine of legal difficulty. The Courts are getting ever more rigid in their demand of legal warrant for the actions of all men, officials included. The lawyers who practise before them are getting more and more astute, and render the difficulty of pointing to such legal warrant day by day greater. And unquestionably the Natives of India, living in the constant presence of courts and lawyers, are growing every day less disposed to regard an act or order which they dislike as an unkindly dispensa- tion of Providence, which must be submitted to with all the patience at their command. If British rule is doing /-nothing else, it is steadily communicating to the Native ! the ...consciousness of positive rights, not dependent on Opinion- or usage, but capable of being actively enforced. It is not, I think, difficult to see how this state of the law and this condition of the Courts and Bar renders it necessary for the Local Governments, as being responsible for the efficiency of their administration, to press for legislation. The nature of the necessity can best be judged by considering what would be the consequences if there were no legislation, or not enough. A vast variety of points would be unsettled until the highest tribunals had the opportunity of deciding them, and the government of the country would be to a great extent handed over to the High Courts, or to other Courts of Appeal. No court of justice, however, can pay other than incidental regard to considerations of expediency, and the result would be that the country would be governed on principles which have no necessary relation to policy or statesmanship. It is the justification of legislation that it settles difficulties as soon as they arise, and settles them upon considerations which a court of justice is obliged to leave out of sight. APPENDIX I. -213 The consequences of having India to be governed by the courts would, in my judgment, be most disastrous. The bolder sort of officials would, I think, go on without regard to legal rule, until something like the deadlock would be reached with which we are about to deal in the Punjab. But the great majority of administrative officials, whether weaker or less reckless, would observe a caution and hesitation for which the doubtful state of the law could always be pleaded. There would, in fact, be a para- lysis of administration throughout the country. The fact established by the Paper, that the duties created by Indian legislation are almost entirely official duties, explains the dislike of legislation which occasion- ally shows itself here and there in India. I must confess that I have always believed the feeling, so far as it exists, to be official, and to correspond very closely to the re- pugnance which most lawyers feel to having the most disorderly branch of case-law superseded by the simplest and best drawn of statutes. The truth is, that nobody likes innovations on knowledge which he has once ac- quired with difficulty. If there was one legislative change which seemed at the time to be more rebelled against than another, it was the supersession of the former Civil Pro- cedure of the Punjab by the Code of Civil Procedure. The Civil Procedure of the Punjab had originally been exceedingly simple, and far better suited to the country than the then existing procedure of the Regulation Pro- vinces. But two years ago it had become so overlaid by explanations and modifications conveyed in Circular orders, that I do not hesitate to pronounce it as uncertain and difficult a body of rules as I ever attempted to study. I can speak with confidence on the point ; for I came to India strange both to the Code of Civil Procedure and to the Civil Procedure of the Punjab, and, while the first has always seemed to me nearly the simplest and clearest 214 APPENDIX I. system of the kind in the world, I must own I never felt sure in any case what was the Punjab rule. The intro- duction of the Code was, in fact, the merest act of justice to the young generation of Punjab officials, yet the older men spoke of the measure as if some ultra-technical body of law were being forced on a service accustomed to courts of primitive simplicity. It must, on the other hand, be admitted that, in creating new official duties by legislation, we probably in some degree fetter official discretion. There is no doubt a decay of discretionary administration throughout India ; and, indeed, it may be said that in one sense there is now not more, but much less, legislation in the country than formerly ; for, strictly speaking, legislation takes place every time a new rule is set to the people, and it may be taken for granted that in earlier days Collectors and Com- missioners changed their rules far oftener than does the Legislature at present. The truth is, discretionary govern- ment is inconsistent with the existence of regular courts and trained lawyers, and, since these must be tolerated, the proper course seems to me not to indulge in vague condemnation of legislation, but to discover expedients by which its tendency to hamper discretion may be mini- mised. One of these may be found in the skilful drafting of our laws in confining them as much as possible to the statement of principles and of well-considered general propositions, and in encumbering them as little as possible with detail. Another may be pointed out in the extension of the wholesale practice of conferring by our Acts on Local Governments or other authorities the power of making rules consistent with the Act a power in the exercise of which they will be assisted by the Legislative Department under a recent order of His Excellency. Lastly, but principally, we may hope to mitigate the inconveniences of legislation by the simplification of our legislative APPENDIX I. 215 machinery as applied to those less advanced parts of the country where a large discretion must inevitably be vested in the administrator. The power of easily altering rules when they chafe, and of easily indemnifying officials when they transgress rules in good faith, is urgently needed by us in respect of the wilder territory of India. While I admit that the abridgment of discretion by written laws is to some extent an evil though, under the actual circumstances of India, an inevitable evil I do not admit the proposition which is sometimes advanced that the Natives of India dislike the abridgment of official discretion. This assertion seems to me not only unsup- ported by any evidence, but to be contrary to all the probabilities. It may be allowed that in some cases discretionary government is absolutely necessary ; but why should a people, which measures religious zeal and personal rank and respectability by rigid adherence to usage and custom, have a fancy for rapid changes in the actions of its governors, and prefer a regimen of discretion sometimes coming close upon caprice to a regimen of law? I do not profess to know the Natives of this country as well as others, but if they are to be judged by their writings, they have no such preference. The educated youth of India certainly affect a dislike of many things which they do not care about, and pretend to many tastes which they do not really share; but the repugnance which they invariably profess for discretionary government has always seemed to me genuinely hearty and sincere. 216 APPENDIX II. 1 G. L. v. Maurer, Einleitung zur Geschichte der Mark-, Hof-, Dorf-, und Stadt-Verfassung und der offentlichen Gewalt. Munchen. G. L. v. Maurer, Geschichte der Dorfverfassung in Deutschland. Erlangen. G. L. v. Maurer, Geschichte der Frohnhofe, der Bauernhb'fe und der Hofverfassung in Deutschland. Erlangen. G. L. v. Maurer, Geschichte der Markenverfassung in Deutschland. Erlangen. G. L. v. Maurer, Geschichte der Stadteverfassung in Deutschland. Erlangen. E. Nasse, Ueber die mittelalterliche Feldgemeinschafl und die Einhegungen des sechszehnten Jahrhunderts in England. Bonn. G. Landau, Die Territorien in Bezug auf ihre Bildung und ihre Entwicklung. Hamburg. G. Landau. Das Salgut. Kassel. Ch. Lette, Die Vertheilung des Grundeigenthums in Zusammenhang mit der Geschichte der Gesetzgebung und den Volkszustanden. Berlin. N. Kindlinger, Geschichte der deutschen Horigkeit, insbesondere der sogenannten Leibeigenschaft. Berlin. W. Gessner, Geschichtliche Entwickelung der gutsherrlichen und bauerlichen Verhaltnisse Deutschlands, oder practische Ge- schichte der deutschen Horigkeit. Berlin. Von Haxthausen, Ueber die Agrarverfassung in Norddeutschland. Berlin. 1 Vide Preface. 'UHIV INDEX. INDEX. ACC A CCOUNTANT, village, his im- -*- portance in India, 125 Administrators, Indian, their fear of altering native custom, 39 Agriculture, conditions of, in India as compared with Northern and Central Europe, 108. See Village Communities Arable Mark, existence of the, in the Indian village community, 108. See Village Communities Austin, John, his view of jurispru- dence, 4 "DENEFICES, origin and influence J-J of, on feudalism, 132 Bengal, Lower, power of making a will in, 40. Decay of the village system in, 104. Lord Cornwallis's land settlement of, 105, 153. Bad reputation of the Zemindars of, as landlords, 163 Blamire, Mr., adopts the popular theory on landed property, 84 CALCUTTA, origin of the city of, U 118 Carrying trade, influence of the, in India, 197 Caste, real nature of, in India, 56, 57 CON Cities, European, some probably the Township Mark of Teutonic villages, 118 Cities, Indian, causes of the growth of villages into, 118. Origin of the formation of Indian capitals, 119. The great deserted cities, 119 Civil courts in India, 34. Appeals from the Settlement and Revenue courts to the, 34. Difference be- tween a High and a Chief court, 35. The Supreme courts and their judicial powers, 36. Dismay caused by the introduction of English law, 38. Native and English laws compared, 49 Clan society, the Celtic form of family organisation, 156 Commercial principles, primitive, 196 Common, commonable, and common fields, in England, 85. * Stint of common,' 89. The Indian waste or common land, 120, 121. Con- troversy after 1857 as to waste land in India, 121. Action of the government respecting it, 122. Exotic origin of the ancient three- field English system, 200 Contract, not the source of law in primitive communities, 110. De- struction of the village system by the obligations arising out of, 113 220 INDEX. CON FRE Conveyances, ancient, of land, 188 Cornwallis, Lord, his settlement of Lower Bengal, 105, 153 Council, village, legislation of the, 116, 123. Sometimes superseded by a Headman, 122 Court Baron, authority of the Lord of the Manor in the, 134, 139 Court Leet, functions of the, 139, 140 Courts of Justice established by the English in India, 71. None in some of the semi-independent native States, 71 Custom, stability of, in India, 9. Slavery of Indians to, 13. Indian administrators and native custom, 39. Attachment of an Oriental to his local custom, 39. Varieties of native usage, 51, 52. Preserva- tion of customary law, 55. Agen- cies by which this preservation has been effected, 55. Antiquity of Indian custom, 65, 66. Changes in the nature of usage, 72, 75. Origin and growth of custom, 109 Customary Manorial Courts, func- tions of the, 139, 140 DELHI, exactions of the Maho- metan Emperors of, 179 Devises, Statute of, influence of, in throwing small properties into the hands of large landowners, 169, 170 Distribution, failure of primitive till- ing communities for securing, 166 ENGLAND, existence of the Arable Mark and Common Mark in, 85. Various names of the cultivated portion of the domain in, 85. True succession groups of proprietors in, 135. Waste, or common land, has become the Lord's waste, 135. The modern legal theory of the Lord's rights, 136. Advantages of absolute pro- perty over the village community system, 162 English in India, their influence on legal conceptions, 69. Their un- willing assumption of sovereignty, 70. Their establishment of Courts of Justice, 71. A cause of the growth of the conception of right, 73 Eviction rare in India, 186 Experts, legal, employment of, in England, in modern times, 170 FMILY, the great source of per- sonal law, 11. Formation of the Patriarchal Family, 15 Families, leading, causes of the ag- grandisement of, 145 Feudalism, origin of, 131, 132. In- fluence of benefices, 132. The Manor, 133. Causes of feudalisa- tion, 142, 343. Growth of suze- rainties, 144. Elements of the feudal system, 146. Systematic feudalism, 147. Imperfect feuda- lisation of India, 158-160. Suf- fering which accompanied feudali- sation in Europe, 161. Advan- tages which the transition of one form of property to another pro- duced, 162. Cultivation of waste land in Europe, 162. Tendency in the primitive Teutonic system towards feudalism, 21 Freeman, Mr., his identification of fragments of ancient Teutonic society in Switzerland, 9 INDEX. 221 GAM IRE GAME not strictly private property according to English law, 142 Grain-dealer, the, excluded in India from privileges, 197 Grass-lands, customs of various manors respecting, 136 TTEADMAN of an Indian village, office of, 122, 155. Power which he enjoys, 155. Nature and origin of the rights claimed by certain families, 156 Hereditary offices, tendency among Teutonic races to, 132 Hermes, the three attributes of the god, 193 TNCLOSURE and Inclosure Acts, importance of the history of, 85 India, village communities of, 12, et seq. India regarded in England as uninteresting, 22. Importance of the English conquest and go- vernment, 23. Ignorance of India discreditable in Englishmen, 23. Gradual disappearance of Indian phenomena, 24. Ignorance and superstition of Indian native so- ciety, 25. Influence of Western ideas, of physical ideas, and of British dominion, 26, 27. Eng- lish compared with Indian society, 56. Influence of caste, 56, 57. Influence of English law, 74. Discovery and recognition of the existence of the Indian village community, 103. The Maho- metan theory of ownership in the land, 104. Conditions of agricul- ture in India as compared with Europe, 108. Common or waste lands in, 120, 131. Peaceful cha- racter of the people of, 124. Their submission to the power of mer- cenary armies, 124. The ( out- siders ' of Indian villages, 127. Shape taken by all disputes in, 128. Mode of dealing with a newly- annexed province, 149. The various land settlements and their results, 149-151 . Analogy between Teutonic kings and the British government in India, 151. Ma- hometan assumptions, 152. The two great Indian schools of opi- nion respecting the functionaries administering the country, 153. Property recognised by the English, 156. Absolute ownership, 157. Comparison of English and Indian Conditions, 159. Structure of village communities in India, 175. Exactions of Oriental sovereigns, 179. Questions about rent, 180, 181. Influence of the carrying trade in India, 197. Minute on the over-legislation attributed to the English Government, 205 Indian Law, sources of, 31. Custo- mary law, 31. Settlement, 32. The Record of Rights, 33. Dis- placement of native by English law, 37. Dismay with which English law was regarded, 38. Mode of administering the Hin- doo code, 49-51. Varieties of native usage, 51, 52 Indians, secrecy of their family life, 114. Their intellectual quick- ness, 56 International Law, the undoubted parent of, 193 Ireland, quantity of detail in the ancient Irish law, 81. The three ancient kinds of rent in, 186, 187 222 INDEX. JUR MAN JURISPRUDENCE, chief func- tl tion of Comparative, 3, 4. John Austin's views, 4. The comparative and historical me- thods, 6. Instruction which India may yield to the student of his- torical j urisprudence, 15 Jus Gentium, influence and impor- tance of the, 193, 194 T AMMAS lands, 85. Inclosures J-J removed on Lammas Day, 86 Land, Record of Rights in, 72. Oldest forms of property in, 76. Scarcity of laws as to the tenure of, 51. Teutonic origin of Eng- lish theories of law in, 83. Un- soundness of the popular theory, 84. Importance of the history of inclosures and inclosure acts, 85. The ancient cultivated portion of the domain, and its various names, 86. Modes of redistributing the shares, 86. Effect of shifting severalties, 87. Great extent of the common fields, 88. And of the pasturage on baulks of turf, 89. Existing baulks, 89. Vestiges of the Mark, 88. Marshall's account of the ancient state of England quoted, 90-94. The Udal tenures of Orkney and Shetland, 94, 95. The f Burgess Acres ' in the burgh of Lauder, 95. Mohometan theory of ownership in land, 104. Lord Cornwallis's settlement of Lower Bengal, 105. Estates in Oudh, 105. Creation of a peasant pro- prietary under prosperous condi- tions, 105, 106. Conditions of agriculture in India as compared with Europe, 108. Customs of re-partition of the cultivated lands, 112. Common or waste lands in India, 120, 121. The process of feudalisation, 131. Benefices, 132. The Manorial group, 133, 134. Causes of the growth of suze- rainties, 144. Causes in German and Scandinavian cultivating com- munities leading to inequality of property in land, 146. Land set- tlements in India, 105, 149-52. Ancient rule as to the highest obtainable rent for the use of land, 186. Ancient Irish rents, 186, 187. Primitive notions as to price, 187. Rarity of ancient transfers of land, 188. Competition-rent, 189 Lauder, the ' Burgess Acres ' in the burgh of, 95, 96. The 'Hill parts,' 96 Law, analysis of a, 66, 67. Indian conceptions of a, 68. English in- fluence on legal conceptions, 69. Sources of, in primitive commu- nities, 110 Loans, nature of, in oldest Roman contracts, 188, 189 Lubbock, Sir John, on the first steps of mankind towards civilisation, 16. On markets, 192 MCLENNAN, Mr., on civilisation, 16 Madras, success of the peasant pro- prietary of, 105 Mahometan law, foundation of, 49. Its interest for the jurist, 49 Mahometan theory of ownership of land, 104 Mahratta brigands, their rise against the Mahometans. 124. Exactions of their princes, 179 Manor, origin and formation of the, 133. Authority of the Lord in the Court Baron, 134. Tene- INDEX. 223 MAN mental lands and the Lord's Do- main, 134. Rights of the Lord to the waste, 135. The 'right of approvement ' affirmed by the Statute of Merton and subsequent statutes, 135. Modern legal theory of the Lord's rights, 136. Changes in the grass-lands, 136. The free holders of Tenemental land corresponding to the old village community, 137. Settlement of villeins, 138. The Manorial Courts, 139. Encroachments of the Lord, 141. The Manorial group better suited than the village group for bringing waste lands under culti- vation, 164. Customary tillage, 165 Manorial Court, Customary, power of the, 134 Manorial courts, the three, 139 Maim, Code of, 20. Influence of Brahminical theories upon the, 20. Penetrates but little among the people of India, 39. Development of Hindoo law, 46. Mode of ad- ministering it, 49-51 Mark, or township of Teutonic families, 10. System of the, 10. Vestiges of it in England, 1 1 Mark, the Arable, rights and duties of the ancient Teutons respecting, 79, 80. The Mark occasionally shifted, 81. Existence of the Arable Mark in England, 85 Mark, the Common, in ancient Teu- tonic Society, rights and duties of the, 79 Markets, origin of, 192. Association between markets and neutrality, 193. Three ideas as to, 193. Extreme rule of Market Law, 195. Rule of Market Overt, 195. Ten- dency of decisions of English courts towards the law of the OWN Market, 194. Causes which have generalised a Rule of the Market, 197 Marshall, Mr. W., his account of the ancient state of agriculture quoted, 90-94 Maurer, Von, on the law of the Mark or township, 10. On the feudal tendency of the primitive Teutonic system, 21. His inquiry into the forms of Teutonic village property, summary of his conclusions, 77, et seq. Morier, Mr., his paper in ' Sys- tem of Land Tenure in Various Countries,' 78. His account of the vestiges of collective property in Germany, 78. On the aspects of the Teutonic freeman as a lord and as a commoner, 82 NASSE, Professor, on the land-law of Germany and England, 11, 17. Account of his work, 168, 169 Neutrality, ancient association be- tween markets and, 193 Nuncomar, fairness of the trial of, 38 f ACCUPANCY ' tenants in In- \J dia, creation of, 184. Period of time required for determining who are, 184 Orkney Isles, system of the township in the, 10. Sir W. Scott on the Udal tenure, 94 Oudh, settlement of estates in, 105. Military character given to the naturally peaceful population of, 124 Ownership, absolute, of the English in India, 157-59 224 INDEX. PAT SWI PATERFAMILIAS, the, m an- L cient Teutonic society, 78. His authority, 78. His relations to the other heads of families, 79. His authority in the Indian village community, 107 Peasant proprietary in India, esta- blishment and success of the, 105 Personal Property, Law of, tenden- cies of, 194 Police of Indian villages, recognised and paid by the British Govern- . ment, 125 Political Economy, the contract of hiring and letting in, 190. The proposition which forms the basis of, 191. The Market, 192 Price, early history and measure of, 189 Prize of War, theoretical right of the sovereign to, 142 Production, primitive tilling com- munities ineffective for, 166 Property, collective, native control over testation of, 41 Pundits, consulted in the courts, 50. Charges against them, 50 EACE, modern theories of, 3 4 Rack-rents in ancient Ireland, 187. Generally, 187, 188. Reason why rack-rents do not exist in some places, 199 Rent, creation and difficulties of, in India, 180, 181. Ideas of Anglo- Indians, 182. Customary and competition rents, 183. Ancient rule as to the highest obtainable rent for the use of land, 186. Rack-rents generally, 187, 188. Modern origin of the highest obtainable rent, 198. The market for land in England and Scotland, 199. Reason why rack-rents do not exist in some places, 199 Revenue courts and officers in India, and their duties, 33, 34 Roman Law, period arrived at in, 19 SCOTT, Sir Walter, his remarks on the Udal tenures of Orkney and Shetland, 94, 95 Seignory in gross, 134 Settlement, Indian, 32. Settlement officers and their reports, 32. Re- cord of Rights, and its importance, 33. Settlement in newly-acquired provinces in India, 149. Various forms of, 150. Mahometan as- sumptions, 152 Shetland Isles, system of township in the, 10. Sir W. Scott on the Udal tenure of, 94 Sikhs, exactions of the, 179 Slavery, generally, predial, and under peasants, 166 Sudder courts, powerful influence of the Supreme courts over the, 39. History of, 43. Appeals to them, 43. Judges of the, 44. Their in- fluence, 45. Effect of judicial commentaries on the, 47 Supreme courts of India and their powers, 36. Condemnation which they have everywhere received except in India, 37, 38. Their powerful influence on the Sudder courts, 39 Surnames, possible causes of the fre- quency of trades as, in England, 126 Suzerainties, causes of the growth of, 144 Switzerland, Mr. Freeman's identifi- cation of fragments of Teutonic Society in, 9 INDEX. 225 TAL VIL fTlALUKDARS, settlement of the, -L in Oudh, and its results, 150, 151 Teutonic society, fragments of archaic, in Switzerland, 9. Enquiries of Von Maurer, 9, 77. The Teutonic Mark, 10. The ' vicus ' described by Tacitus, 10. Resemblances of Indian village communities to Teutonic townships, 12. Account of an ancient Teutonic cultivating community, 78-82. Tendency among the Teutonic races to here- ditary offices, 132. Causes and results of the aggrandisement of leading families, 145 Townships, Teutonic. See Mark Trades, hereditary, of Indian villages, 125. Possible causes of the plen- tifulness and persistence of trades as surnames in England, 126 Tradition, subject of, 58. Effect of, in India, 58. Different forms of, 58, 59. Value attached just now to traditional law in India, 59 TTDAL tenures of Orkney and Shet- LJ land, 94, 95 Usury laws, effect of the repeal of the, 195 YICUS, the, described by Tacitus, 10 Village Communities of India, their resemblance to Teutonic town- ships, 12. The land-law of, 18. De- cay of the village system in Lower Bengal, 40, 104. Coincidence of the systems of India and Teutonic society, 61, 62. Rights and duties, 67. Declarations of the council of village elders, 68, 69. Discovery and recognition of the existence of the Indian village community, 103. The Mahometan theory of owner- ship, 104. Secrecy of Indian family life, 114. Dislike of Eng- lish criminal law, 115. Legisla- ture of the council of elders, 116, 123. Their customary rules, 117. Causes of the growth of Indian villages into cities, 118, 119. Disputes sometimes decided by a single Headman, 122. Submission of naturally peaceful villagers to the power of mercenary armies, 124. The village community or- ganised and self-acting, 125. The outsiders, 127. Power of absorp- tion of strangers by the commu- nity, 128. Tendency of agrarian rights to decay, 150. Effect of the land settlement of Oudh, 150. The office of Headman in various places, 155. Absolute ownership of the English, 157-59. Imperfect feudalisation of India, 158-60. The communities left to their own way by great kings and mercenary armies, 160. The cultivating com- munity as compared with the ab- solute property of our own day, 164. Primitive tilling communities ineffective for securing Produc- tion and Distribution, 166. State of the servile dependents of vil- lagers, 166. Reasons why stran- gers ceased to be absorbed by villages, 167, 168. Structure of Indian village communities, 175. Divisions in the community itself, 176. Question of the right of property within the community, 177. Tradition as to rights, 178. Origin and difficulties of rent, 180, 181. Analogy of the holders of the highest rights in India to English landowners in fee simple, 226 INDEX VIL 184. Creation of ' occupancy' tenants, 184. Comparison of In- dian and English forms of pro- perty/ 185. Eviction rarely prac- tised in India, 186 Village communities in North America, organisation of the, 201 Village communities, Teutonic, 78, et seq. WASTE, or common lands, the cultivation of, demanded by a growing population, 162 Water rules in India, 109, 110 ZEM Widows, origin of the oppressive disabilities of, in Hindoo laws, 54. The written restrictions compared with unwritten usage, 55 Will, the, of Lower Bengal, 40. A modern Indian will, 41, 42. Dan- gers caused by the wills of un- learned testators, 170. Necessity for restraints on testamentary power, 171 fTEMINDAES, their settlement Ll and its results, 150. Their bad reputation in Lower Bengal as landlords, 163 LONDON: PUINTED BY SPOTTISWOODB AND CO., NEW-STREET SQUARE AND PARLIAMENT 8TUEBT V STANDARD RAWLINSON'S HISTOEY OF HEEODOTUS. A NEW ENGLISH VERSION. Edited, with copious NOTES, from the most recent sources of information ; and embodying the chief results, historical and ethnographical, which have been obtained in the progress of cuneiform and hieroglyphical discovery. Second Edition. With Maps and Woodcuts. 4 vols. 8vo. 485. GEOTE'S HISTOEY OF GEEECE. From the EARLIEST PERIOD to the close of the GENERATION contemporary with ALEXANDER THE GREAT. Fourth Edition. With Portrait and Plans. 12 vols. Post 8vo. 65. each. GIBBON'S HISTOEY OF THE DECLINE AND FALL OF THE KOMAN EMPIEE. Edited, with Notes, by WM. SMITH, LL.D. Fourth Edition. With Portrait and Maps. 8 vols. 8vo. 605. EANKE'S HISTOEY OF THE POPES OF EOME : POLITICAL AND ECCLESIASTICAL. Translated by SAEAH AUSTIN. With Preface by DEAN MILMAN. Fourth Edition. 3 vols. 8vo. 305. HALLAM'S HISTOEICAL WOEKS. I. HISTOEY OF ENGLAND. II. EUROPE DURING THE MIDDLE AGES. III. LITERARY HISTORY of EUROPE. 9 vols. 8vo. 965. MAHON'S HISTOEY OF ENGLAND, FEOM THE PEACE OF UTRECHT TO THE PEACE OF VERSAILLES, 1713 1783. Fourth Edition. 7 vols. 8vo. 93s. VON SYBEL'S HISTOEY OF EUEOPE DUEING THE FEENCH EEVOLUTION; drawn up for the most part from Unpublished Papers and Documents in the SECRET ARCHIVES of GERMANY. Translated from the third German edition by WALTEE C. PEEEY. With Index, complete in 4 vols. 8vo. 485. DYEE'S HISTOEY OF MODEEN EUEOPE ; from the TAKING of CONSTANTINOPLE by the TURKS, to the CLOSE of the WAR IN THE CRIMEA, 1453 1857. 4 vols. 8vo. 425. EOBEETSON'S HISTOEY OF THE CHEISTIAN CHUECH : FROM THE APOSTOLIC AGE TO THE DEATH OF BONIFACE VIII. A.D. 1122 1303. Third Edition. 3 vols. 8vo. AUSTIN'S LECTUEES ON GENEEAL JUEISPEU- DENCE ; or, the PHILOSOPHY OF POSITIVE LAW. Third Edition, revised and edited by EOBEET CAMPBELL, Barrister-at-Law. 2 vols. 8vo. 325. STANDARD EDITIONS. FEEGUSSON'S HISTOEY OF AECHITECTUEE IN ALL COUNTKIES, FROM THE EARLIEST TIMES TO PRESENT DAY. With 1,500 Illustrations and Index. 3 vols. 8vo. 6 15s. 6d. WOEDSWOETH'S GEEECE ; PICTORIAL, DESCRIPTIVE, AND HISTORICAL. With an ESSAY ON G-REEK ART, by GEORGE SCHAKF, F.S.A. With 600 Illustrations. Royal 8vo. 21s. CEOWE AND CAVALCASELLE'S HISTOEY OF PAINTING- IN ITALY, the 2nd to the 14th Century, from recent researches in the Archives, as well as from personal inspection of the Works of Art in that country. With 100 Illustrations. 3 vols. 8vo. 63s. FOESYTH'S LIFE OF MAECUS TULLIUS CICEEO ; His CHARACTER as a Statesman, Orator, and Friend. With a Selection from his Correspondence and Orations. With 20 Illustrations. 8vo. 16s. SMILES'S BEITISH ENGINEEES : FKOM THE EARLIEST PERIOD, including the HISTORY of Inland Communication in Britain and the INVENTION and INTRODUCTION of the STEAM ENGINE. With 9 Portraits and 350 Illustrations. 4 vols. 8vo. 21s. each. BIOGEAPHIA JUEIDICA; A BIOGEAPHICAL DICTIONARY OF THE JUDGES OF ENGLAND, FROM THE CONQUEST TO THE PRESENT TIME, 10661870. A New and thoroughly revised Edition. By EDWARD FOSS. One Volume (800 pp.) 8vo. 21s. KING'S CATHEDEALS OF ENGLAND ; a CONCISE HISTORY of each SEE, with BIOGRAPHICAL NOTICES of the BISHOPS. With 250 Illustrations. 4 vols. Post 8vo. 58s. THE SOUTHERN DIVISION. WINCHESTER, SALISBURY, EXETER, WELLS, ROCHESTER, CANTERBURY, AND CHICHESTER. With 120 Illustrations. 2 vols. 24s. THE EASTERN DIVISION. OXFORD, PETERBOROUGH, LINCOLN, NORWICH, AND ELY. With 90 Illustrations. 18s. THE WESTERN DIVISION. BRISTOL, GLOUCESTER, WORCESTER, HERE- FORD, AND LICHFIELD. With 50 Illustrations. 16s. ' The manuals, histories, descriptions, essays, and so forth, of and upon mediaeval archi- tecture are innumerable, and yet a systematic portable account of all the English Cathedrals, compiled in the terms of modern architectural science, remained a desideratum. This is full of very valuable information, architectural, archaeological, historical, and artistic.' SATURDAY KKVIKW. JOHN MURRAY, Albemarle Street. ALBEMARLE STREET, LONDON, February, 1871. MR MUKKATS GENERAL LIST OF WORKS. ALBERT'S (PRINCE) SPEECHES AND ADDRESSES ON PUBLIC OCCASIONS; with an Introduction, giving some outline of his Character. With Portrait. 8vo. 10s. 6d. ; or Cheap Edition, fcap. 8vo. Is. ABBOTT'S (REV. J.) Memoirs of a Church of England Missionary in the North American Colonies. Post 8vo. 2s. ABERCROMBIE'S (JOHN) Enquiries concerning the Intellectual Powers and the Investigation of Truth. Nineteenth Edition. Fcap. 8vo. 3s. 6OTJ,The Asturias, Galicia, Estremadura, Andalusia, Ronda, Granada, Murcia, Valencia, Catalonia, Arragon, Navarre, The Balearic Islands, &c. &c. Maps. 2 Vols. Post 8vo. 24s. - PORTUGAL, LISBON, Porto, Cintra, Mafra, &c. Map. Post 8vo. 9*. NORTH ITALY, Piedmont, Liguria, Venetia, Lomhardy, Parma, Modena, and Romagna. Map. Post 8vo. 12s. CENTRAL ITALY, Lucca, Tuscany, Florence, The Marches, Umhria. and the Patrimony of St. Peter's. Map. PostSvo. 10s. ROME AND ITS ENVIRONS. Map. Post 8vo. 9s. - SOUTH ITALY, Two Sicilies, Naples, Pompeii, Herculaneum, and Vesuvius. Map. Post 8vo. 10*. - KNAPSACK GUIDE TO ITALY. Post 8vo. 6. - SICILY, Palermo, Messina, Catania, Syracuse, Etna, and the Ruins of the Greek Temples. Map. Post 8vo. 12. PAINTING. The Italian Schools. Edited by Sir CHARLES EASTLAKE, R. A. Woodcuts. 2 Vols. PostSvo. 30s. LIVES OF ITALIAN PAINTERS, FROM CIMABUE to BASSANO. By Mrs. JAMESON. Portraits. Post 8vo. 12s. RUSSIA, ST. PETERSBURG^, Moscow, POLAND, and FINLAND. Maps. Post 8vo. 15s. PUBLISHED BY MR. MURRAY. 17 HAND-BOOK DENMARK, SWEDEN, and NORWAY. Maps. Post 8vo. - KNAPSACK GUIDE TO NORWAY. Map. Post 8vo. 6s. GREECE, the Ionian Islands, Albania, Thessaly, and Macedonia. Maps. PostSvo. (In preparation.} - CONSTANTINOPLE, the Bosphorus, Dardanelles, Bronsa, and Plain of Troy. With General Hinls for Travelling in Turkey. Maps. Post 8vo. 7s. Qd. EGYPT, Thebes, the Nile, Alexandria, Cairo, the Suez Canal, the Pyramids, &c. Map. Post 8vo. 15s. HOLY LAND SYKIA AND PALESTINE, Peninsula of Sinai, Edom, and Syrian Desert. Maps. 2 Vols. Post 8vo. 24s. INDIA BOMBAY AND MADRAS. Map. 2 Vols. Post. 8vo. 12s. each. ENGLISH HANDBOOKS. HAND-BOOKMODERN LONDON. Map. 16mo. 3s. 6d. - ESSEX, CAMBRIDGE, SUFFOLK, AND NOR- FOLK, Chelmsford, Colchester, Maldon, Cambridge, Ely, Newmarket, Bury, Ipswich, Woodbridge.Felixstowe, Lowestoft, Norwich, Yarmouth, Cromer, &c. Map and Plans. Post 8vo. 12s. CATHEDRALS of Oxford, Peterborough, Norwich. Ely, and Lincoln. With 90 Illustrations. Crown 8vo. 18s. KENT AND SUSSEX, Canterbury, Dover, Rams- gate, Sheerness, Rochester, Chatham, Woolwich, Brighton, Chichester, Worthing, Hastings, Lewes, Arundel,