CHARlEftTHE JIliF ENGRAVED BY CHARLES COOK LOfTim GE6R<'< &SOHS,BEQADWA!( 1 1CDGATE BUI HISTORY OF THE REIGN OF CHARLES THE FIFTH BY WILLIAM ROBEETSON, D.D. WITH AN ACCOUNT OF THE EMPEROR'S LIFE AFTER HIS ABDICATION BY WILLIAM H. PRESCOTT IN TWO VOLUMES VOLUME I. FUNK & WAGNALLS COMPANY NEW YORK 1905 ADVERTISEMENT. THE life of Charles the Fifth subsequently to his abdi- cation is disposed of by Dr. Kobertson in some six or seven pages. It did not, in truth, come strictly within the author's plan, which proposed only a history of the reign of the emperor. But, unfortunately, these few pages contain many inaccuracies, and, among others, a very erroneous view of the interest which Charles, in his retirement, took in the concerns of the government. Yet it would be unjust to impute these inaccuracies to want of care in the historian, since he had no access to such authentic sources of information as would have enabled him to correct them. Such information was to be derived from documents in the archives of Simancas, consisting, among other things, of the original correspondence of the emperor and his household, and showing conclusively that the monarch, instead of remaining dead to the world in his retreat, took not merely an interest, but a decided 20981 43 iv ADVEETISEMENT. part, in the management of affairs. But in Kobertson's day Simancas was closed against the native as well as the foreigner ; and it is not until within a few years that the scholar has been permitted to enter its dusty recesses and draw thence materials to illustrate the national history. It is particularly rich in materials for the illustration of Charles the Fifth's life after his abdication. Availing themselves of the opportunities thus afforded, several emi- nent writers, both in England and on the Continent, have bestowed much pains in investigating a passage of history hitherto so little understood. The results of their labours they have given to the world in a series of elaborate works, which, however varying in details, all exhibit Charles's character and conduct in his retirement in a very different point of view from that in which it has been usual to regard them. It was the knowlege of this fact which led the publishers of the present edition of Robertson's "Charles the Fifth," to request me to prepare " such an account of his monastic life as might place before the reader the results of the recent researches in Simancas, and that in a more concise form as better suited to the purpose for which it was designed than had been adopted by preceding writers. I was the more willing to undertake the task, that my previous studies had made ADVEBTTSEMENT. V me familiar with the subject, and that I was possessed of a large body of authentic documents relating to it, copied from the originals in Simancas. These documents, indeed, form fie basis of a chapter on the monastic life of Charles at the close of the first Book of the History of Philip the Second, written, I may add, in the summer of 1851, more than a year previous to the publication of Mr. Stirling's admirable work, which led the way in the series of brilliant productions relating to the cloister life of Charles. In complying with the request of the publishers, I have made the authentic records which I have received from Simancas the foundation of my narrative, freely availing myself, at the same time, of the labours of my predecessors, especially those of Mr. Stirling and M. Mignet, wherever they have thrown light on the path from sources not within my reach. In the performance of the task I have been insensibly led into a much greater length than I had originally intended, or than, I fear, will be altogether palatable to those who have become already familiar with the narrative in the writings of those who have preceded me. To such readers I cannot, indeed, flatter myself that I have given vi ADVERTISEMENT. any information of importance beyond what they may have acquired from these more extended and elaborate works. But by far the larger part of readers in our community have probably had no access to these works ; and I may express the hope that I have executed the task in such a manner as to satisfy any curiosity which, after perusing the narrative of the illustrious Sottish historian, they may naturally feel respecting the closing scenes in the life of the great emperor. WILLIAM H. PRESCOTT. BOSTOH, November 10, 1866 TO THE KING. SIR, I PRESUME to lay before your Majesty the history of a period vrhich, if the abilities of the writer were equal to the dignity of the subject, would not be unworthy the attention of a monarch who is no less a judge than a patron of literary merit. History claims it as her prerogative to offer instruction to kings, as well as to their people. What reflections the reign of the Emperor Charles the Fifth may suggest to your Majesty, it becomes not me to conjecture. But your subjects cannot observe the various calamities which that monarch's ambition to be distinguished as a conqueror brought upon his domi- nions, without recollecting the felicity of their own times, and looking up with gratitude to their sovereign, who, during the fervour of youth, and amidst the career of victory, possessed such self-command, and maturity of judgment, as to set bounds to his own triumphs, and prefer the blessings of peace to the splendour of military glory. Posterity will not only celebrate the wisdom of your Majesty's choice, but will enumerate the many virtues which yiii DEDICATION. render your reign conspicuous for a sacred regard to all the duties incumbent on the sovereign of a free people. It is our happiness to feel the influence of these virtues, and to live under the dominion of a prince who delights more in promoting the public welfare than in receiving the just praise of his royal beneficence. I am, Sir, Your Majesty's most faithful subject, And dutiful servant, WILLIAM ROBERTSON. PEEFACE. No period in the history of one's own country can be considered as altogether uninteresting. Such transac- tions as tend to illustrate the progress of its constitution, laws, or manners, merit the utmost attention. Even re- mote and minute events are objects of a curiosity, which being natural to the human mind, the gratification of it is attended with pleasure. But with respect to the history of foreign states, we must set other bounds to our desire of information. The universal progress of science during the last two centuries, the art of printing, and other obvious causes, have filled Europe with such a multiplicity of histories, and with such vast collections of historical materials, that the term of human life is too short for the study or even the perusal of them. It is necessary, then, not only for those who are called to conduct the affairs of nations, but for such as inquire and reason concerning them, to remain satisfied with a general knowledge of distant events, and to confine their study of history in detail chiefly to that period in which, the several states of Europe having become intimately connected, the operations of one power are so felt by all as to influence their councils and to regulate their measures. Some boundary, then, ought to be fixed, in order to separate these periods. An era should be pointed out, prior to which each country, little connected with those around it, may trace its own history apart ; after which, X PREFACE. the transactions of every considerable nation in Europo, become interesting and instructive to all. With this intention I undertook to write the History of the Emperor Charles the Fifth. It was during his administration that the powers of Europe were formed into one great politi- cal system, in which each took a station, wherein it has since remained with less variation than could have been expected after the shocks occasioned by so many internal revolutions and so many foreign wars. The great events which happened then have not hitherto spent their force. The political principles and maxims then established still continue to operate. The ideas concerning the balance of power then introduced, or rendered general, still influence the councils of nations. The age of Charles the Fifth may therefore be con- sidered as the period at which the political state of Europe began to assume a new form. I have endeavoured to render my account of it an introduction to the history of Europe subsequent to his reign. While his numerous biographers describe his personal qualities and actions, while the historians of different countries relate occur- rences the consequences of which were local or transient, it hath been my purpose to record only those great trans- actions in his reign, the effects of which were universal or continue to be permanent. As my readers could derive little instruction from such a history of the reign of Charles the Fifth without some information concerning the state of Europe previous to the sixteenth century, my desire of supplying this has produced a preliminary volume,* in which I have attempted to point out and to explain the great causes * These passages in the text re- a somewhat different arrangement fear to the original edition : the in respect to the division of the additional matter incorporated in volumes, the present edition has required PREFACE. XI and events to whose operation all the improvements in the political state of Europe, from the subversion of the Roman empire to the beginning of the sixteenth century, must be ascribed. I have exhibited a view of the pro- gress of society in Europe, not only with respect to interior government, laws, and manners, but with respect to the command of the national force requisite in foreign operations ; and I have described the political consti- tution of the principal states in Europe at the time when Charles the Fifth began his reign. In this part of my work I have been led into several critical disquisitions, which belong more properly to the province of the lawyer or antiquary than to that of the historian. These I have placed at the end of the first volume, under the title of Proofs and Illustrations.* Many of my readers will, probably, give little attention to such researches. To some, they may perhaps appear the most curious and interesting part of the work. I have carefully pointed out the sources from which I have derived information, and have cited the writers on whose authority I rely with a minute exactness, which might appear to border upon ostentation, if it were possible to be vain of having read books, many of which nothing but the duty of examining with accuracy whatever I laid before the public could have induced me to open. As my inquiries conducted me often into paths which were obscure or little frequented, such constant references to the authors who have been my guides were not only necessary for authenticating the facts which are the foundations of my reasonings, but may be useful in pointing out the way to such as shall hereafter hold the same course, and in enabling them to carry on their researches with greater facility and success. * See note on p. z. Xll PREFACE. Every intelligent reader will observe ont< omission in my work, the reason of which it is necessaiy to explain. I have given no account of the conquests of Mexico and Peru, or of the establishment of the Spanish colonies in the continent and islands of America. The history of these events I originally intended to have related at con- siderable length. But upon a nearer and more attentive consideration of this part of my plan, I found that the discovery of the New World, the state of society among its ancient inhabitants, their character, manners, and arts, the genius of the European settlements in its various provinces, together with the influence of these upon the systems of policy or commerce in Europe, were subjects so splendid and important that a superficial view of them could afford little satisfaction ; and, on the other hand, to treat of them as extensively as they merited must produce an episode disproportionate to the principal work. I have therefore reserved these for a separate history ; which, if the performance now offered to the public shall receive its approbation, I purpose to undertake. Though, by omitting such considerable but detached articles in the reign of Charles the Fifth, I have circum- scribed my narration within more narrow limits, I am yet persuaded, from this view of the intention and nature of the work which I thought it necessary to lay before my readers, that the plan must still appear to them too extensive, and the undertaking too arduous. I have often felt them to be so. But my conviction of the utility of such a history prompted me to persevere. With what success I have executed it, the public must now judge. I wait, not without solicitude, for its decision, to which I shall submit with a respectful silence. CONTENTS OF VOL. I. A VIEW OF THE PROGRESS OF SOCIETY IN EUROPE. SECTION I. VIEW OF THE PROGRESS OF SOCIETY IN EUROPE WITH RESPECT TO INTERIOR GOVERNMENT, LAWS, AND MANNERS. I'AQB The Effects of the Roman Power on the Shite of Europe. The Irruption of the Barbarous Nations. Their Settlements in the Countries they had conquered. Decay of the Roman Empire. Desolation occasioned by the Barbarians. Origin of the present Political System of Europe. The Feudal System. Its Effects upon the Arts, Literature, and Religion. The Crusades, and their Effects upon Society. Growth of Municipal Institutions. Emancipation of the Peasantry. Beginning of a regular Administration of Justice. Trial by Combat. Appeals. Ecclesiastical Courts. Discovery of the Code of Justinian. Chivalry. Revival of Learning. Influence of Commerce. Italians the First Merchants and Bankers. Rise of Trade and Manufactures among the Cities of the Hanseatic League. In the Netherlands. In England . 1 79 SECTION H. VIEW OF THE PROGRESS OP SOCIETY IN EUROPE WITH RESPECT TO THE COMMAND OP THE NATIONAL FORCE REQUISITE IN FOREIGN OPERATIONS. Improved State of Society at the Beginning of the Fifteenth Century. The Concentration of Resources in European States. The Power of Monarchs ; their Revenues and Armies. Affairs of Different States at first entirely Distinct. Progress of Combination. Loss of Continen- tal Territory by the English. Effects upon the French Monarchy. Growth of Standing Armies, and of the Royal Prerogative under Louis XL His Example imitated in England and in Spain. The heiress of Burgundy. Perfidious Conduct of Louis XL towards her. Her Mar- riage with Maximilian, Archduke of Austria. Invasion of Italy by Charles VIII. The Balance of Power. Use of Infantry in Armies. League of Cambray against Venice 80116 SECTION III. VIEW OP THE POLITICAL CONSTITUTION OP THE PRINCIPAL STATES IN EUROPE, AT THE COMMENCEMENT OP THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Ftaly at the Beginning of the Sixteenth Century. The Papal Power. Alexander VI. and Julius II. Defects in Ecclesiastical Governments. XIV CONTENTS. Venice ; its Rise and Progress ; its Naval Power and its Commerce ; Florence. Naples and Sicily. Contest for its Crown. Duchy of Milan. Ludovico Sforza. Spain ; conquered by the Vandals and by the Moors ; gradually re-conquered by the Christians. Marriage of Ferdinand and Isabella. The Eoyal Prerogative. Constitution of Aragon and of Castile. Internal Disorders. " The Holy Brother- hood." France ; its Constitution and Government. The Power of its Early Kings. Government becomes purely Monarchical, though restrained by the Nobles and the Parliaments. The German Empire. Power of the Nobles and of the Clergy. Contests between the Popes and the Emperors. Decline of Imperial Authority. Total Change of Government. Maximilian. The Real Power and Revenues of the Emperors, contrasted with their Pretensions. Complication of Diffi- culties. Origin of the Turkish Empire ; its Character. The Janizaries. Solyman ........... 116181 PBOOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS ..... . 183 290 HISTOKY OF CHAELES V. BOOK I. Birth of Charles V. His Hereditary Dominions. Philip and Joanna, his Parents. Birth of Ferdinand, his Brother. Death of Isabella. Philip's Attempts to obtain the Government of Castile. The Regent Ferdinand marries a Niece of the French King to exclude Philip and his Daughter. The Castilian Nobility declare for Philip. Philip and Joanna proclaimed. Death of Philip. Incapacity of Joanna. Ferdi- nand made Regent. His Acquisition of Territory. His Death. Education of Charles V. Cardinals Ximenes and Adrian. Charles acknowledged King. Ximenes strengthens the Royal Power ; is opposed by the Nobles. War in Navarre and in Africa. Peace with France. Charles visits Spain. His Ingratitude towards Ximenes. Death of the Latter. Discontent of the Castilians. Corruption of the King's Flemish Favourites. Reception of Charles in Aragon. Death of the Emperor Maximilian. Charles and Francis I. Competitors for the Empire. Views of the other Reigning Potentates. Assembly of the Electors. The Crown offered to Frederic of Saxony. He declines in Favour of Charles, who is chosen. Discontent of the Spaniards. Insurrection in Valencia. The Cortes of Castile summoned to meet in Galicia. Charles appoints Regents, and embarks for the Low Coun- tries .... . 293 .-558 BOOK II. Rivalry between Charles and Francis 1." for the Empire. They negotiate with the Pope, the Venetians, and Henry VIII. of England. Character of the latter. Cardinal Wolsey. Charles visits England. Meeting between Henry VIII. and Francis I. Coronation of Charles. Soly- man the Magnificent. The Diet convoked at Worms. The Reforma- tion. Sale of Indulgences by Leo X. Tetzel. Luther. Progress of his Opinions. Is summoned to Rome. His Appearance before the Legate. His Appeals to a General Council. Luther questions the CONTENTS. XV MM Papal Authority. Reformation in Switzerland. Excommunication of Luther. Reformation in Germany. Causes of the Progress of the Reformation. The Corruption in the Roman Church. Power and HI Conduct of the Clergy. Venality of the Roman Court. Effects of the Invention of Printing.-- Erasmus. The Diet at Worms. Edict against Luther. He is seized and confined at Wartburg. His Doctrines con- demned by the University of Paris, and controverted by Henry VIII. of England.- Henry VIII. favours the Emperor Charles against Francis L Leo X. makes a Treaty with Charles. Death of Chievres. - Hostilities in Navarre and in the Low Countries. Siege of Mezieres. Congress at Calais. League against France. Hostilities in Italy. Death of Leo X. Defeat of the French. Henry VIII. declares War against France. Charles visits England. Conquest of Rhodes by Solyman 359 445 BOOK III. Insurrections. Attempts of the Regent, Adrian, to suppress them. Con- federacy in Castile against him. Measures taken by the Emperor. Remonstrance of the Junta. They take up Arms. Their Negotiations with the Nobles. The Junta under Padilla defeated in Battle. Defence of Toledo by his Widow. The War in Valencia and in Ma- jorca. Generosity of the Emperor. Reception of Adrian at Rome. His Pacific Policy. A New League against France. Treachery of the Duke of Bourbon. Francis attacks Milan. Death of Adrian, and Election of Clement VII. Disappointment of Wolsey. Progress of the War with France. Pope Clement unable to bring about Peace. The French abandon the Milanese. Death of Bayard. The Reforma- tion in Germany. Luther translates the Bible. The Diet at Nurem- berg proposes a General Council. The Diet presents a List of Griev- ances to the Pope. Opinion at Rome concerning the Policy of Adrian. Clement's Measures against Luther 446 502 BOOK IV. Views of the Italian States respecting Charles and Francis. Charles invades France without Success. Francis invades the Milanese. He besieges Pavia. Neutrality of the Pope. Francis attacks Naples. Movements of the Imperial Generals. Battle of Pavia. Francis taken Prisoner. Schemes of the Emperor. Prudence of Louise the Regent. Conduct of Henry VIII. and of the Italian Powers. The Emperor's rigorous Terms to Francis. Francis carried to Spain. Henry makes a Treaty with the Regent Louise. Intrigues of Morone in Milan. He is be- trayed by Pescara, Treatment of Francis. Bourbon made General and Duke of Milan. Treaty of Madrid. Liberation of Francis. Charles marries Isabella of Portugal. Affairs in Germany. Insurrec- tions. Conduct of Luther. Prussia wrested from the Teutonic Knights. Measures of Francis upon reaching his Kingdom. A League against the Emperor. Preparations for War. The Colonnas Masters of Rome. The Pope detached from the Holy League. Position of the Emperor. Bourbon marches towards the Pope's Territories. Negotiations. Assault of Rome. Bourbon slain. The City taken and plundered. The Pope a Prisoner. Hypocrisy of the Emperor. Solyman invades Hungary. Ferdinand, Archduke of Austria, becomes King of Hungary. Progress of the Reformation 503 576 BOOK V. General Indignation and Confederacy against the Emperor. The Floren- tines. The French Army in Italy. The Emperor sets the Pope at CONTENTS. Liberty, and makes Pacific Overtures. A Royal Challenge. Retreat of the Imperial Army from Rome. The French besiege Naples-- Revolt of Andrew Doria. Freedom of Genoa. Operations in the Milanese. Treaty between the Pope and the Emperor, and between Charles and Francis. Henry VIII. seeks a Divorce from his Queen, Catharine of Aragon. Charles visits Italy and re-establishes the Power of the Medici. Returns to Germany. The Diet of Spires. The Protest. The Diet of Augsburg. Decree against the Protestants. Charles makes his Brother Ferdinand King of the Romans. Negotiations of the Protestants. The Campaign in Hungary. Conference between the Emperor and the Pope. Movements of the French King. Henry divorced from Queen Catharine by the Archbishop, and excommuni- cated by the Pope. Papal Authority abolished in England. Death of Clement VII. Pope Paul III. Insurrection of the Anabaptists in Germany. They become Masters of Munster. John of Leyden crowned King. Confederacy against him. Munster besieged and taken. The League of Smalkalde. Expedition of the Emperor to Africa. The Barbary States. The Barbarossas. Conquest of Tunis. The Emperor besieges Goletta, defeats Barbarossa. and restores the King of Tunis. 577- -668 A VIEW OF THE PROGRESS OF SOCIETY IN EUROPE, FBOH THE SUBVERSION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE TO THE BEGINNING OF THE SIXTEENTH UENTUBY. YOU t. A VIEW or THE PROGRESS OF SOCIETY IN EUROPE, FROM THE SUBVERSION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE TO THE BEGINNING OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. SECTION I. VIEW OF THE PROGRESS OF SOCIETY IN EUROPE WITH RESPECT TO INTERIOR GOVERNMENT, LAWS, AND MANNERS. The Effects of the Roman Power on the State of Europe. The Irruption of the Barbarous Nations. Their Settlements in the Countries they had conquered. Decay of the Roman Empire. Desolation occasioned by the Barbarians. Origin of the present Political System of Europe. The Feudal System. Its Effects upon the Arts, Literature, and Religion. The Crusades, and their Effects upon Society. Growth of Municipal Institutions. Emancipation of the Peasantry. Beginning of a regular Administration of Justice. Trial by Combat Appeals. Ecclesiastical Courts. Discovery of the Code of Justinian. Chivalry. Revival of Learning. Influence of Commerce. Italians the first Merchants and Bankers. Rise of Trade and Manufactures among the Cities of the Hanseatic League, in the Netherlands, in England. Two great revolutions have happened in the political slate and in the manners of the European nations. The first was occasioned by the progress of the Eoman power ; the second by the subversion of it. When the spirit of conquest led the armies of Eome beyond the Alps, they found all the countries which they in- vaded inhabited by people whom they denominated B 2 * A VIEW OF THE [SECTION i. barbarians, but who were nevertheless brave and inde- pendent. These defended their ancient possessions with obstinate valour. It was by the superiority of their discipline, rather than that of their courage, that the Romans gained any advantage over them. A single battle did not, as among the effeminate inhabitants of Asia, decide the fate of a state. The vanquished people resumed their arms with fresh spirit, and their undisciplined valour, animated by the love of liberty, supplied the want of conduct as well as of union. During those long and fierce struggles for dominion or independence, the countries of Europe were suc- cessively laid waste, a great part of their inhabitants perished in the field, many were carried into slavery, and a feeble remnant, incapable of farther resistance, submitted to the Eoman power. The Eomans, having thus desolated Europe, set them- selves to civilize it. The form of government which they established in the conquered provinces, though severe, was regular, and preserved public tranquillity. As a consolation for the loss of liberty, they commu- nicated their arts, sciences, language, and manners to their new subjects. Europe began to breathe, and to recover strength after the calamities which it had un- dergone ; agriculture was encouraged ; population in- creased ; the ruined cities were rebuilt ; new towns were founded; an appearance of prosperity succeeded, and repaired in some degree, the havoc of war. This state, however, was far from being happy or favourable to the improvement of the human mind. The vanquished nations were disarmed by their con- querors and overawed by soldiers kept in pay to restrain them. They were given up as a prey to rapacious governors, who plundered them with impunity, and were drained of their wealth by exorbitant taxes, levied with so little attention to the situation of the provinces that SECTION i.] STATE OF EUROPE. 5 the impositions were often increased in proportion to their inability to support them. They were deprived of their most enterprising citizens, who resorted to a distant capitel in quest of preferment or of riches ; and were accustomed in all their actions to look up to a superior and tamely to receive his commands. Under so many depressing circumstances, it was hardly pos- sible that they could retain vigour or generosity of mind. The martial and independent spirit which had distin- guished their ancestors became in a great measure ex- tinct among all the people subjected to the Eoman yoke ; they lost not only the habit but even the capa- city of deciding for themselves or of acting from the impulse of their own minds ; and the dominion of the Eomans, like that of all great empires, degraded and debased the human species. 1 A society in such a state could not subsist long. There were defects in the Eoman government, even in its most perfect form, which threatened its dissolution. Time ripened these original seeds of corruption, and gave birth to many new disorders. A constitution un- sound and worn out must have fallen into pieces of itself, without any external shock. The violent irrup- tion of the Goths, Yandals, Huns, and other barbarians hastened this event, and precipitated the downfall of the empire. New nations seemed to arise, and to rush from unknown regions, in order to take vengeance on the Eomans for the calamities which they had inflicted on mankind. These fierce tribes either inhabited the various provinces in Germany which had never been subdued by the Eomans, or were scattered over those vast countries in the north of Europe and northwest of Asia which are now occupied by the Danes, the Swedes, the Poles, the subjects of the Eussian empire, and the Tartars. Their condition and transactions previous to 1 NoteL 6 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION I. their invasion of the empire are but little known. Almost all our information with respect to these is derived from the Eomans ; and, as they did not pene- trate far into countries which were at that time uncul- tivated and uninviting, the accounts of their original state given by the Roman historians are extremely im- perfect. The rude inhabitants themselves, destitute of science as well as of records, and without leisure or curiosity to inquire into remote events, retained, per- haps, some indistinct memory of recent occurrences, but beyond these all was buried in oblivion or involved in darkness and in fable. 2 The prodigious swarms which poured in upon the empire from the beginning of the fourth century to the final extinction of the Roman power have given rise to an opinion that the countries whence they issued were crowded with inhabitants ; and various theories have been formed to account for such an extraordinary degree of population as hath procured these countries the appellation of " the storehouse of nations." But if we consider that the countries possessed by the people who invaded the empire were of vast extent, that a great part of these was covered with woods and marshes, that some of the most considerable of the barbarous nations subsisted entirely by hunting or pasturage, in both which states of society large tracts of land are required for maintaining a few inhabitants, and that all of them were strangers to the arts and industry, without which population cannot increase to any great degree, we must conclude that these countries could not be so populous in ancient times as they are in the present, when they still continue to be less peopled than any other part of Europe or of Asia. But the same circumstances that prevented the bar- barous nations from becoming populous contributed to 8 Note II. N i.] STATE Otf EUEOPE. 7 inspire, or to strengthen, the martial spirit by which they were distinguished. Inured by the rigour of their climate, or the poverty of their soil, to hardships which rendered their bodies firm and their minds vigorous, accustomed to a course of life which was a continual preparation for action, and disdaining every occupation but that of war or of hunting, they undertook and prose- cuted their military enterprises with an ardour and impetuosity of which men softened by the refinements of more polished times can scarcely form any idea. 3 Their first inroads into the empire proceeded rather from the love of plunder than from the desire of new settlements. Eoused to arms by some enterprising or popular leader, they sallied out of their forests, broke in upon the frontier provinces with irresistible violence, put all who opposed them to the sword, carried off the most valuable effects of the inhabitants, dragged along multitudes of captives in chains, wasted all before them with fire or sword, and returned in triumph to their wilds and fastnesses. Their success, together with the accounts which they gave of the unknown conveniences and luxuries that abounded in countries better culti- vated or blessed with a milder climate than their own, excited new adventurers and exposed the frontier to new devastations. When nothing was left to plunder in the adjacent provinces, ravaged by frequent excursions, they marched farther from home, and, finding it difficult or dangerous to return, they began to settle in the countries which they had subdued. The sudden and short excursions in quest of booty, which had alarmed and disquieted the empire, ceased; a more dreadful calamity im- pended. Great bodies of armed men, with their wives and children and slaves and flocks, issued forth, like regular colonies, in quest of new settlements. People 3 No*e III. 8 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION i. who had no cities, and seldom any fixed habitation, were so little attached to their native soil that they migrated without reluctance from one place to another. New adventurers followed them. The lands which they deserted were occupied by more remote tribes of bar- barians. These, in their turn, pushed forward into more fertile countries, and, like a torrent continually increasing, rolled on, and swept every thing before them. In less than two centuries from their first irrup- tion, barbarians of various names and lineage plundered and took possession of Thrace, Pannonia, Gaul, Spain, Africa, and at last of Italy, and Rome itself. The vast fabric of the Roman power, which it had been the work of ages to perfect, was in that short period overturned from the foundation. Many concurring causes prepared the way for this great revolution, and insured success to the nations which invaded the empire. The Roman commonwealth had conquered the world by the wisdom of its civil maxims and the rigour of its military discipline. But under the emperors the former were forgotten or de- spised, and the latter was gradually relaxed. The armies of the empire in the fourth and fifth centuries bore scarcely any resemblance to those invincible legions which had been victorious wherever they marched. In- stead of freemen who voluntarily took arms from the love of glory or of their country, provincials and bar- barians were bribed or forced into service. These were too feeble, or too proud, to submit to the fatigue of military duty. They even complained of the weight of their defensive armour as intolerable, and laid it aside. Infantry, from which the armies of ancient Rome de- rived their vigour and stability, fell into contempt ; the effeminate and undisciplined soldiers of later times could hardly be brought to venture into the field but on horse- back. These wretched troops, however, were the only. SUCTION i.J STATE OF EUROPE. 9 guardians of the empire. The jealousy of despotism had deprived the people of the use of arms ; and subjects oppressed and rendered incapable of defending them- selves had neither spirit nor inclination to resist their invaders, from whom they had little to fear, because their condition could hardly be rendered more unhappy. At the same time that the martial spirit became extinct, the revenues of the empire gradually diminished. The taste for the luxuries of the East increased to such a pitch in the imperial court that great sums were carried into India, from which, in the channel of commerce, money never returns. By the large subsidies paid to the barbarous nations, a still greater quantity of specie was withdrawn from circulation. The frontier provinces, wasted by frequent incursions, became unable to pay the customary tribute ; and the wealth of the world, which had long centred in the capital of the empire, ceased to flow thither in the same abundance, or was diverted into other channels. The limits of the empire continued to be as extensive as ever, while the spirit requisite for its defence declined, and its resources were exhausted. A vast body, languid and almost unanimated, became in- capable of any effort to save itself, and was easily over- powered. The emperors, who had the absolute direction of this disordered system, sunk in the softness of Eastern luxury, shut up within the walls of a palace, ignorant of war, unacquainted with affairs, and governed entirely by women and eunuchs, or by ministers equally effemi- nate, trembled at the approach of danger, and, under circumstances which called for the utmost vigour in council as well as in action, discovered all the impotent irresolution of fear and of folly. In every respect the condition of the barbarous nations was the reverse of that of the Romans. Among the former the martial spirit was in full vigour; their leaders were hardy and enterprising ; the arts which 10 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION i. had enervated the Romans were unknown; and such was the nature of their military institutions that they brought forces into the field without any trouble, and supported them at little expense. The mercenary and effeminate troops stationed on the frontier, astonished at their fierceness, either fled at their approach or were routed on the first onset. The feeble expedient to which the emperors had recourse, of taking large bodies of the barbarians into pay and of employing them to repel new invaders, instead of retarding, hastened the de- struction of the empire. These mercenaries soon turned their arms against their masters, and with greater advan- tage than ever ; for by serving in the Eoman armies they had acquired all the discipline, or skill in war, which the Romans still retained ; and upon adding these to their native ferocity they became altogether irresistible. But though, from these and many other causes, the progress and conquests of the nations which overran the empire became so extremely rapid, they were accom- panied with horrible devastations and an incredible destruction of the human species. Civilized nations, which take arms upon cool reflection, from motives of policy or prudence, with a view to guard against some distant danger or to prevent some remote contingency, carry on their hostilities with so little rancour or animo- sity that war among them is disarmed of half its terrors. Barbarians are strangers to such refinements. They rush into war with impetuosity and prosecute it with violence. Their sole object is to make their enemies feel the weight of their vengeance ; nor does their rage subside until it be satiated with inflicting on them every possible calamity. It is with such a spirit that the savage tribes in America carry on their petty wars. It was with the same spirit that the more powerful and no less fierce barbarians in the north of Europe and of Asia fell upon the Roman empire. SECTION i.] STATE OF EUROPE. 11 Wherever they marched, their route was marked with blood. They ravaged or destroyed all around them. They made no distinction between what was sacred and what was profane. They respected no age, or sex, or rank. What escaped the fury of the first inundation perished in those which followed it. The most fertile and populous provinces were converted into deserts, in which were scattered the ruins of villages and cities that afforded shelter to a few miserable inhabitants whom chance had preserved, or the sword of the enemy, wearied with destroying, had spared. The conquerors who first settled in the countries which they had wasted were expelled or exterminated by new invaders, who, coming from regions farther removed from the civilized parts of the world, were still more fierce and rapacious. This brought fresh calamities upon mankind, which did not cease until the North, by pouring forth successive swarms, was drained of people and could no longer furnish instruments of destruction. Famine and pesti- lence, which always march in the train of war when it ravages with such inconsiderate cruelty, raged in every part of Europe and completed its sufferings. If a man were called to fix upon the period in the history of the world during which the condition of the human race was most calamitous and afflicted, he would without hesitation name that which elapsed from the death of Theodosius the Great to the establishment of the Lom- bards in Italy. 4 The contemporary authors who beheld that scene of desolation labour and are at a loss for ex- pressions to describe the horror of it. The scourge of God, The destroyer of nations, are the dreadful epithets by which they distinguish the most noted of the bar- barous leaders ; and they compare the ruin which they 4 Theodosius died A.D. 395 ; the was one hundred and seventy-six reign of Alboinus in Lombardy be- years, gan A.D. 571 : so that this period 1*2 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION f. had brought on the world to the havoc occasioned by earthquakes, conflagrations, or deluges, the most formid- able and fatal calamities which the imagination of man can conceive. But no expressions can convey so perfect an idea of the destructive progress of the barbarians as that which must strike an attentive observer when he contemplates the total change which he will discover in the state of Europe after it began to recover some degree of tran- quillity, towards the close of the sixth century. The Saxons were by that time masters of the southern and more fertile provinces of Britain ; the Franks, of Gaul ; the Huns, of Pannonia ; the Goths, of Spain ; the Goths and Lombards, of Italy and the adjacent pro- vinces. Very faint vestiges of the Eoman policy, juris- prudence, arts, or literature remained. New forms of government, new laws, new manners, new dresses, new languages, and new names of men and countries were everywhere introduced. To make a great or sudden alteration with respect to any of these, unless where the ancient inhabitants of a country have been almost totally exterminated, has proved an undertaking beyond the power of the greatest conquerors. 5 The great change which the settlement of the barbarous nations occa- sioned in the state of Europe may, therefore, be con- sidered as a more decisive proof, than even the testi- mony of contemporary historians, of the destructive violence with which these invaders carried on their conquests, and of the havoc which they had made from one extremity of this quarter of the globe to the other. 6 In the obscurity of the chaos occasioned by this general wreck of nations, we must search for the seeds of order, and endeavour to discover the first rudiments of the policy and laws now established in Europe. To 6 Note IV. 6 Note V. SECTION I.] STATE OP EUEOPE. 13 this source the historians of its different kingdoms have attempted, though with less attention and industry than the importance of the inquiry merits, to trace back the institutions and customs peculiar to their countrymen. It is not my province to give a minute detail of the progress of government and manners in each particular nation whose transactions are the object of the follow- ing history. But in order to exhibit a just view of the state of Europe at the opening of the sixteenth century it is necessary to look back, and to contemplate the condition of the Northern nations upon their first settle- ment in those countries which they occupied. It is necessary to mark the great steps by which they ad- vanced from barbarism to refinement, and to point out those general principles and events which, by their uniform as well as extensive operation, conducted all of them to that degree of improvement in policy and in manners -which they had attained at the period when Charles Y. began his reign. When nations subject to despotic government make conquests, these serve only to extend the dominion and the power of their master. But armies composed of freemen conquer for themselves, not for their leaders. The people who overturned the Eoman empire and settled in its various provinces were of the latter class. Not only the different nations that issued from the north of Europe, which has always been considered as the seat of liberty, but the Huns and Alans, who inhabited part of those countries which have been marked out as the peculiar region of servitude, 7 enjoyed freedom and independence in such a high degree as seems to be scarcely compatible with a state of social union or with the subordination necessary to maintain it. They followed the chieftain who led them forth in quest of new settlements, not by constraint, but from choice j ? De 1'Esprit des Loix, liv. xvii. ch. 3. 14 A VIEW OP THE [SECTION i. not as soldiers whom he could order to march, but as volunteers who offered to accompany him. 8 They con- sidered their conquests as a common property, in which all had a title to share, as all had contributed to acquire them. 9 In what manner or by what principles they divided among them the lands which they seized, we cannot now determine with any certainty. There is no nation in Europe whose records reach back to this remote period ; and there is little information to be got from uninstructive and meagre chronicles, compiled by writers ignorant of the true end and unacquainted with the proper objects of history. This new division of property, however, together with the maxims and manners to which it gave rise, gradually introduced a species of government formerly unknown. This singular institution is now distinguished by the name of the feudal system ; and though the barbarous nations which framed it settled in their new territories at different times, came from different countries, spoke various languages, and were under the command of separate leaders, the feudal policy and laws were estab- lished, with little variation, in every kingdom of Europe. This amazing uniformity hath induced some authors 10 to believe that all these nations, notwithstanding so many apparent circumstances of distinction, were ori- ginally the same people. But it may be ascribed with greater probability to the similar state of society and of manners to which they were accustomed in their native countries, and to the similar situation in which they found themselves on taking possession of their new domains. As the conquerors of Europe had their acquisitions to maintain, not only against such of the ancient inhabit- 8 Note VI. Script. Byz., edit. Ven., voL i 9 Note VII. p. 345. " Procop. de Bello Vandal., ap. SECTION i.l STATE OF EUROPE. 15 ants as they had spared, but against the more formidable inroads of new invaders, self-defence was their chief care, and seems to have been the chief object of their first institutions and policy. Instead of those loose associations which, though they scarcely diminished their personal independence, had been sufficient for their security while they remained in their original countries, they saw the necessity of uniting . in more close con- federacy, and of relinquishing some of their private rights in order to attain public safety. Every freeman, upon receiving a portion of the lands which were divided, bound himself to appear in arms against the enemies of the community. This military service was the condition upon which he received and held his lands ; and, as they were exempted from every other burden, that tenure, among a warlike people, was deemed both easy and honourable. The king 01 general who led them to con- quest, continuing still to Le the head of the colony, had, of course, the largest portion allotted to him. Having thus acquired the meaLo of rewarding past services, as well as of gaining new adherents, he parcelled out his lands with this view, binding those on whom they were bestowed to resort to his standard with a number of men in proportion to the extent of the territory which they received, and to bear arms in his defence. His chief officers imitated the example of the sovereign, and, in distributing portions of their lands among their depend- ants, annexed the same condition to the grant. Thus a feudal kingdom resembled a military establishment rather than a civil institution. The victorious army, cantoned out in the country which it had seized, con- tinued ranged under its proper officers and subordinate to military command. The names of a soldier and of a freeman were synonymous. 11 Every proprietor of land, girt with a sword, was ready to march at the summons 11 Du Cange, Glossar., voc. Miles. 16 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION i. of his superior and to take the field against the common enemy. But though the feudal policy seems to be so admirably calculated for defence against the assaults of any foreign power, its provisions for the interior order and tran- quillity of society were extremely defective. The prin- ciples of disorder and corruption are discernible in that constitution under its best and most perfect form. They soon unfolded themselves, and, spreading with rapidity through every part of the system, produced the most fatal effects. The bond of political union was extremely feeble ; the sources of anarchy were innumerable. The monarchical and aristocratieal parts of the constitution, having no intermediate power to balance them, were perpetually at variance and justling with each other. The powerful vassals of the crown soon extorted a con- firmation for life of those grants of land which, being at first purely gratuitous, had been bestowed only during pleasure. Not satisfied with this, they prevailed to have them converted into hereditary possessions. One step more completed their usurpations, and rendered them unalienable. 12 With an ambition no less enterprising, and more preposterous, they appropriated to themselves titles of honour, as well as offices of power or trust. These personal marks of distinction, which the public admiration bestows on illustrious merit, or which the public confidence confers on extraordinary abilities, were annexed to certain families, and transmitted like fiefs, from father to son, by hereditary right. The crown vassals having thus secured the possession of their lands and dignities, the nature of the feudal institutions, which, though founded on subordination, verged to independ- ence, led them to new and still more dangerous encroach- ments on the prerogatives of the sovereign. They obtained the power of supreme jurisdiction, both civil 2 Note VIII. i.j STATE OF EUEOPE. 17 and criminal, within their own territories ; the right of coining money ; together with the privilege of carrying on war against their private enemies in their own name and by their own authority. The ideas of political sub- jection were almost entirely lost, and frequently scarce any appearance of feudal subordination remained. Nobles who had acquired such enormous power scorned to con- sider themselves as subjects. They aspired openly at being independent; the bonds which connected the principal members of the constitution with the crown were dissolved. A kingdom considerable in name and in extent was broken into as many separate principalities as it contained powerful barons. A thousand causes of jealousy and discord subsisted among them, and gave rise to as many wars. Every country in Europe, wasted or kept in continual alarm during these endless contests, was filled with castles and places of strength erected for the security of the inhabitants, not against foreign force, but against internal hostilities. A universal anarchy, destructive in a great measure of all the advantages which men expect to derive from society, prevailed. The people, the most numerous as well as the most useful part of the community, were either reduced to a state of actual servitude, or treated with the same insolence and rigour as if they had been degraded into that wretched condition. 13 The king, stripped f almost every prerogative, and without authority to enact or to execute salutary laws, could neither protect the inno- cent nor punish the guilty. The nobles, superior to all restraint, harassed each other with perpetual wars, op- pressed their fellow-subjects, and humbled or insulted their sovereign. To crown all, time gradually fixed and rendered venerable this pernicious system, which violence had established. Such was the state of Europe with respect to the u Note IX. vui. L O 18 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION T. interior administration of government from the seventh to the eleventh century. All the external operations of its various states during this period were, of course, extremely feeble. A kingdom dismembered, and torn with dissension, without any common interest to rouse or any common head to conduct its force, was incapable of acting with vigour. Almost all the wars in Europe during the ages which I have mentioned were trifling, indecisive, and productive of no considerable event. They resembled the short incursions of pirates or ban- ditti, rather than the steady operations of a regular army. Every baron, at the head of his vassals, carried on some petty enterprise to which he was prompted by his own ambition or revenge. The state itself, destitute of u'rion, either remained altogether inactive, or, if it attempted to make any effort, that served only to dis- cover its impotence. The superior genius of Charle- magne, it is true, united all these disjointed and dis- cordant members, and formed them again into one body, restored to government that degree of activity which distinguishes his reign and renders the transactions of it objects not only of attention, but of admiration, to more enlightened times. But this state of union and vigour, not being natural to the feudal government, was of short duration. Immediately upon his death, the spirit which animated and sustained the vast system which he had established being withdrawn, it broke into pieces. All the calamities which flow from anarchy and discord, returning with additional force, afflicted the different kingdoms into which his empire was split. From that time to the eleventh century, a succession of uninteresting events, a series of wars the motives as well as the consequences of which were unimportant, fill and deform the annals of all the nations in Europe. To these pernicious effects of the feudal anarchy may be added its fatal influence on the character and im- SECTION i.J STATE OF EUBOPE. 19 provement of the human mind. If men do not enjoy the protection of regular government, together with the expectation of personal security, which naturally flows from it, they never attempt to make progress in science, nor aim at attaining refinement in taste or in manners. That period of turbulence, oppression, and rapine which I have described was ill suited to favour improvement in any of these. In less than a century after the bar- barous nations settled in their new conquests, almost all the effects of the knowledge and civility which the Romans had spread through Europe disappeared. Not only the arts of elegance, which minister to luxury and are supported by it, but many of the useful arts, without which life can scarcely be considered as com- fortable, were neglected or lost. Literature, science, taste, were words little in use during the ages which we are contemplating ; or, if they occur at any time, eminence in them is ascribed to persons and productions so contemptible that it appears their true import was little understood. Persons of the highest rank and in the most eminent stations could not read or write. Many of the clergy did not understand the breviary which they were obliged daily to recite ; some of them could scarcely read it. 14 The memory of past transac- tions was in a great degree lost, or preserved in annals filled with trifling events or legendary tales. Even the codes of laws published by the several nations which established themselves in the different countries of Europe fell into disuse, while in their place customs vague and capricious were substituted. The human mind, neglected, uncultivated, and depressed, continued in the most profound ignorance. Europe, during four centuries, produced few authors who merit to be read, either on account of the elegance of their composition or the justness and novelty of their sentiments. There 14 Note X. o a 20 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION I. are few inventions useful or ornamental to society of which that long period can boast. Even the Christian religion, though its precepts are delivered, and its institutions are fixed in Scripture, with a precision which should have exempted them from being misinterpreted or corrupted, degenerated, during those ages of darkness, into an illiberal super- stition. The barbarous nations, when converted to Christianity, changed the object, not the spirit, of their religious worship. They endeavoured to conciliate the favour of the true God by means not unlike to those which they had employed in order to appease their false deities. Instead of aspiring to sanctity and virtue, which alone can render men acceptable to the great Author of order and of excellence, they imagined that they satisfied every obligation of duty by a scrupulous observance of external ceremonies. 15 Religion, accord- ing to their conceptions of it, comprehended nothing else-; and the rites by which they persuaded themselves that they could gain the favour of Heaven were of such a nature as might have been expected from the rude ideas of the ages which devised and introduced them. They were either so unmeaning as to be altogether unworthy of the Being to whose honour they were consecrated, or so absurd as to be a disgrace to reason and humanity. 16 Charlemagne in France, and Alfred the Great in England, endeavoured to dispel this dark- ness, and gave their subjects a short glimpse of light and knowledge. But the ignorance of the age was too powerful for their efforts and institutions. The darkness returned, and settled over Europe more thick and heavy than before. As the inhabitants of Europe during these centuries were strangers to the arts which embellish a polished age, they were destitute of the virtues which abound " Note XL 16 Note XIL SECTION i.] STATE OF EUROPE. 21 among people who continue in a simple state. Force of mind, a sense of personal dignity, gallantry in enter- prise, invincible perseverance in execution, contempt of danger and of death, are the characteristic virtues of uncivilized nations. But these are all the offspring of equality and independence, both which the feudal institutions had destroyed. The spirit of domination corrupted the nobles, the yoke of servitude depressed the people, the generous sentiments inspired by a sense of equality were extinguished, and hardly any thing remained to be a check on ferocity and violence. Human society is in its most corrupted state at that period when men have lost their original independence and simplicity of manners, but have not attained that degree of refinement which introduces a sense of de- corum and of propriety in conduct, as a restraint on those passions which lead to heinous crimes. Accord- ingly, a greater number of those atrocious actions which fill the mind of man with astonishment and horror occur in the history of the centuries under review than in that of any period of the same extent in the annals of Europe. If we open the history of Gregory of Tours, or of any contemporary author, we meet with a series of deeds of cruelty, perfidy, and revenge so wild and enormous as almost to exceed belief. But, according to the observation of an elegant and profound historian, 17 there is an ultimate point of de- pression, as well as of exaltation, from which human affairs naturally return in a contrary progress, and beyond which they never pass either in their advance- ment or decline. When defects either in the form or in the administration of government occasion such disorders in society as are excessive and intolerable, it becomes the common interest to discover and to apply 17 Hume's History of England, vol. ii. p. 441. 22 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION I. such remedies as will most effectually remove them. Slight inconveniences may be long overlooked or en- dured; but when abuses grow to a certain pitch the society must go to ruin or must attempt to reform them. The disorders in the feudal system, together with the corruption of taste and manners consequent upon these, which had gone on increasing during a long course of years, seemed to have attained their utmost point of excess towards the close of the eleventh century. From that era we may date the return of government and manners in a contrary direction, and can trace a succession of causes and events which con- tributed, some with a nearer and more conspicuous, others with a more remote and less perceptible influence, to abolish confusion and barbarism, and to introduce order, regularity, and refinement. In pointing out and explaining these causes and events, it is not necessary to observe the order of time with a chronological accuracy : it is of more import- ance to keep in view their mutual connection and dependence, and to show how the operation of one event or one cause prepared the way for another and augmented its influence. We have hitherto been con- templating the progress of that darkness which spread over Europe, from its first approach, to the period of greatest obscuration : a more pleasant exercise begins here ; to observe the first dawnings of returning light, to mark the various accessions by which it gradually increased and advanced towards the full splendour of day. I. The crusades, or expeditions in order to rescue the Holy Land out of the hands of infidels, seemejl to be the first event that roused Europe from the lethargy in which it had been long sunk, and that tended to introduce any considerable change in government or in manners. It is natural to the human mind to view SECTION i.] STATE OF EUROPE. 23 those places which have been distinguished by being the residence of any illustrious personage, or the scene of any great transaction, with some degree of delight and veneration. To this principle must be ascribed the superstitious devotion with which Christians, from the earliest ages of the Church, were' accustomed to visit that country which the Almighty had selected as the inheritance of his favourite people, and in which the Son of God had accomplished the redemption of mankind. As this distant pilgrimage could not be performed without considerable expense, fatigue, and danger, it appeared the more meritorious, and came to be considered as an expiation for almost every crime. An opinion which spread with rapidity over Europe about the close of the tenth and beginning of the eleventh century, and which gained universal credit, wonderfully augmented the number of credulous pil- grims, and increased the ardour with which they under- took this useless voyage. The thousand years mentioned by St. John 18 were supposed to be accomplished, and the end of the world to be at hand. A general con- sternation seized mankind ; many relinquished their possessions, and, abandoning their friends and families, ] lurried with precipitation to the Holy Land, where they imagined that Christ would quickly appear to judge the world. 19 While Palestine continued subject to the Caliphs, they had encouraged the resort of pil- grims to Jerusalem, and considered this as a beneficial species of commerce, which brought into their domi- nions gold and silver and carried out of them but relics and consecrated trinkets. But the Turks having con- quered Syria about the middle of the eleventh century, 1S Rev. xx. 2, 3, 4. Abonis, ibid., p. 332. Chronic. S. 19 Chronic. Will. Godelli, ap. Pantaleonis, ap. Eccard. Corp. Scrip. Bouquet, llecueil des Historiens de Medii JEvi, vol. i. p. 909. Anna- France, torn. x. p. 262. Vita. lista Saxo, ibid., p. 576. 24 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION i. pilgrims were exposed to outrages of every kind from these fierce barbarians. 20 This change, happening pre- cisely at the juncture when the panic terror which I have mentioned rendered pilgrimages most frequent, filled Europe with alarm and indignation. Every per- son who returned from Palestine related the dangers which he had encountered in visiting the holy city, and described with exaggeration the cruelty and vexations of the Turks. When the minds of men were thus prepared, the zeal of a fanatical monk, who conceived the idea of leading all the forces of Christendom against the in- fidels, and of driving them out of the Holy Land by violence, was sufficient to give a beginning to that wild enterprise. Peter the Hermit, for that was the name of this martial apostle, ran from province to province with a crucifix in his hand, exciting princes and people to this holy war, and wherever he came kindled the same enthusiastic ardour for it with which he himself was animated. The Council of Placentia, where up- wards of thirty thousand persons were assembled, pro- nounced the scheme to have been suggested by the immediate inspiration of Heaven. In the Council of Clermont, still more numerous, as soon as the measure was proposed, all cried out with one voice, "It is the will of God." Persons of all ranks catched the con- tagion ; not only the gallant nobles of that age, with their martial followers, whom we may suppose apt to be allured by the boldness of a romantic enterprise, but men in the more humble and pacific stations of life, ecclesiastics of every order, and even women and children, engaged with emulation in an undertaking which was deemed sacred and meritorious. If we may believe the concurring testimony of contemporary i0 Jo. Dan. Schoepflini de sacris tionibus, p. 4, Argent., 1726, 4to. Gallorum in Orientem Expedi- SECTION i.l STATE OF EUEOPB. 25 authors, six millions of persons assumed the cross, 21 which was the badge that distinguished such as devoted themselves to this holy warfare. All Europe, says the princess Anna Comnena, torn up from the foundation, seemed ready to precipitate itself in one united body upon Asia. 22 Nor did the fumes of this enthusiastic zeal evaporate at once ; the frenzy was as lasting as it was extravagant. During two centuries Europe seems to have had no object but to recover, or keep possession of, the Holy Land ; and through that period vast armies continued to march thither. 23 The first efforts of valour, animated by enthusiasm, were irresistible : part of the lesser Asia, all Syria, and Palestine, were wrested from the infidels; the banner of the cross was displayed on Mount Sion; Constanti- nople, the capital of the Christian empire in the East, was afterwards seized by a body of those adventurers who had taken arms against the Mahometans ; and an earl of Flanders and his descendants kept possession of the imperial throne during half a century. But though the first impression of the crusaders was so unexpected that they made their conquests with great ease, they found infinite difficulty in preserving them. Establishments so distant from Europe, surrounded by warlike nations animated with fanatical zeal scarcely inferior to that of the crusaders themselves, were per- petually in danger of being overturned. Before the expiration of the thirteenth century, the Christians were driven out of all their Asiatic possessions, in ac- quiring of which incredible numbers of men had per- ished and immense sums of money had been wasted. The only common enterprise in which the European nations ever engaged, and which they all undertook 21 Fulcherius Carnotensis, ap. w Alexias, lib. x., ap. Byz. Script, Bcmgarsii Gesta Dei per Francos, vol. xi. p. 224. vol. i p. 387, edit. Han., 1611. a Note XIII. 26 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION i. with equal ardour, remains a singular monument of human folly. But from these expeditions, extravagant as they were, beneficial consequences followed which had neither been foreseen nor expected. In their progress towards the Holy Land the followers of the cross marched through countries better cultivated and more civilized than their own. Their first rendezvous was commonly in Italy, in which Venice, Genoa, Pisa, and other cities had begun to apply themselves to commerce, and had made considerable advances towards wealth as well as refinement. They embarked there, and, landing in Dalmatia, pursued their route by land to Constantinople. Though the military spirit had been long extinct in the Eastern empire, and a despotism of the worst species had annihilated almost every public virtue, yet Con- stantinople, having never felt the destructive rage of the barbarous nations, was the greatest as well as the most beautiful city in Europe, and the only one in which there remained any image of the ancient elegance in manners and arts. The naval power of the Eastern empire was considerable. Manufactures of the most curious fabric were carried on in its dominions. Constantinople was the chief mart in Europe for the commodities of the East Indies. Although the Saracens and Turks had torn from the empire many of its richest provinces and had reduced it within very narrow bounds, yet great wealth flowed into the capital from these various sources, which not only cherished such a taste for magnificence, but kept alive such a relish for the sciences, as appears con- siderable when compared with what was known in other parts of Europe. Even in Asia, the Europeans who had assumed the cross found the remains of the know- ledge and arts which .the example and encouragement of the Caliphs had diffused through their empire. Al- though the attention of the historians of the crusades SECTION i.] STATE OF EUEOPE. 27 was fixed on other objects than the state of society and manners among the nations which they invaded, al- though most of them had neither taste nor discernment enough to describe these, they relate, however, such signal acts of humanity and generosity in the conduct of Saladin, as well as some other leaders of the Maho- metans, as give us a very high idea of their manners. It was not possible for the crusaders to travel through so many countries, and to behold their various customs and institutions, without acquiring information and improve- ment. Their views enlarged ; their prejudices wore off ; new ideas crowded into their minds ; and they must have been sensible, on many occasions, of the rusticity of their own manners when compared with those of a ' more polished people. These impressions were not so slight as to bo effaced upon their return to their native countries. A close intercourse subsisted between the East and West during two centuries ; new armies were continually marching from Europe to Asia, while former adventurers returned home, and imported many of the customs to which they had been familiarized by a long residence abroad. Accordingly, we discover, soon after the commencement of the crusades, greater splendour in the courts of princes, greater pomp in public ceremonies, a more refined taste in pleasure and amusements, together with a more romantic spirit of enterprise, spreading gradually over Europe ; and to these wild expeditions, the effect of superstition or folly, we owe the first gleams of light which tended to dispel barbarism and ignorance. But these beneficial consequences of the crusades took place slowly ; their influence upon the state of property, and consequently of power, in the different kingdoms of Europe, was more immediate, as well as discernible. The nobles who assumed the cross and bound themselves to march to the Holy Land soon 28 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION I. perceived that great sums were necessary towards de- fraying the expense of such a distant expedition and enabling them to appear with suitable dignity at the head of their vassals. But the genius of the feudal system was averse to the imposition of extraordinary taxes ; and subjects in that age were unaccustomed to pay them. No expedient remained for levying the sums requisite, but the sale of their possessions. As men were inflamed with romantic expectations of the splendid conquests which they hoped to make in Asia, and possessed with such zeal for recovering the Holy Land as swallowed up every other passion, they relin- quished their ancient inheritances without any reluc- tance, and for prices far below their value, that they might sally forth as adventurers in quest of new settle- ments in unknown countries. The monarchs of the great kingdoms in the "West, none of whom had en- gaged in the first crusade, eagerly seized this oppor- tunity of annexing considerable territories to their crowns at small expense. 24 Besides this, several great barons who perished in the holy war having left no heirs, their fiefs reverted of course to their respective sovereigns ; and by these accessions of property, as well as power taken from the one scale and thrown into the other, the regal authority rose in proportion as that of the aristocracy declined. The absence, too. of many potent vassals, accustomed to control and give law to their sovereigns, afforded them an oppor- tunity of extending their prerogative, and of acquiring a degree of weight in the constitution which they did not formerly possess. To these circumstances we may add that, as all who assumed the cross were taken under the immediate protection of the Church, and its heaviest anathemas were denounced against such as should dis- quiet or annoy those who had devoted themselves to 24 Wilhelm. Malmsbnr. Guibert. Abbas, ap. Bongars., vol. i. p. 481. SECTION i.] STATE OF EUROPE. 29 this sorvi.ee, the private quarrels and hostilities which banished tranquillity from a feudal kingdom were sus- pended or extinguished; a more general and steady administration of justice began to be introduced, and some advances were made towards the establishment of regular government in the several kingdoms of Europe. 25 The commercial effects of the crusades were not less considerable than those which I have already mentioned. The first armies under the standard of the cross, which Peter the Hermit and Godfrey of Bouillon led through Germany and Hungary to Constantinople, suffered so much by the length of the march, as well as by the fierceness of the barbarous people who inhabited those countries, that it deterred others from taking the same route ; and, rather than encounter so many dangers, they chose to go by sea. Yenice, Genoa, and Pisa fur- nished the transports on which they embarked. The sum which these cities received merely for freight from such numerous armies was immense. 26 This, however, was but a small part of what they gained by the expe- ditions to the Holy Land : the crusaders contracted with them for military stores and provisions; their fleets kept on the coast as the armies advanced by land, and, supplying them with whatever was wanting, engrossed all the profits of a branch of commerce which in every age has been extremely lucrative. The success which attended the arms of the crusaders was productive of advantages still more permanent. There are charters yet extant, containing grants to the Vene- tians, Pisans, and Genoese, of the most extensive im- munities in the several settlements which the Christians made in Asia. All the commodities which they imported . or exported are thereby exempted from every imposition; 55 Du Cange, Glossar., voc. Cruce also Note XIV. signatas. Guib. Abbas, ap. Bon- 26 Muratori, Antiquit. Italic, gars., vol. i. pp. 480, 482. See Medii vEvi, vol. ii. p. 905. 30 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION 1 the property of entire suburbs in some of the mari- time towns, and of large streets in others, is vested in them ; and all questions arising among persons set- tled within their precincts or who traded under their protection are appointed to be tried by their own laws and by judges of their own appointment. 27 When the crusaders seized Constantinople and placed one of their own leaders on the imperial throne, the Italian states were likewise gainers by that event. The Venetians, who had planned the enterprise and took a considerable part in carrying it into execution, did not neglect to secure to themselves the chief advantages redounding from its success. They made themselves masters of part of the ancient Peloponnesus in Greece, together with some of the most fertile islands in the Archipelago. Many valuable branches of the commerce which formerly centred in Constantinople were transferred to Venice, Genoa, or Pisa. Thus a succession of events occasioned by the holy war opened various sources from which wealth flowed in such abundance into these cities 28 as enabled them, in concurrence with another institution, which shall be immediately mentioned, to secure their own liberty and independence. II. The institution to which I alluded was the form- ing of cities into communities, corporations, or bodies politic, and granting them the privilege of municipal jurisdiction, which contributed more perhaps than any other cause to introduce regular government, police, and arts, and to diffuse them over Europe. The feudal government had degenerated into a system of oppres- sion. The usurpations of the nobles were become un- bounded and intolerable ; they had reduced the great body of the people into a state of actual servitude : the 27 Muratori, Antiquit. Italic. Constant, sous 1'Empereurs Fran- Medii .uch panic terror that he died (if we may believe historians) of the fright. Another abdicated his throne from the same pusillanimous spirit. A third fled out of his dominions as soon as the enemy appeared on the Neapolitan frontiers. Charles, after marching thither from the bottom of the Alps with as much rapidity and almost as little opposition as if he had been on a progress through his own dominions, took quiet posses- sion of the throne of Naples, and intimidated or gave law to every power in Italy. Such was the conclusion of an expedition that must be considered as the first great exertion of those new powers which the princes of Europe had acquired and now began to exercise. Its effects were no less con- siderable than its success had been astonishing. The Italians, unable to resist the impression of the enemy who broke in upon them, permitted him to hold on his course undisturbed. They quickly perceived I hat no 106 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION 11 single power which they could rouse to action *vas an equal match for a monarch who ruled over such exten- sive territories and was at the head of such a martial people, but that a confederacy might accomplish what the separate members of it durst not attempt. To this expedient, the only one that remained to deliver or to preserve them from the yoke, they had recourse. While Charles inconsiderately wasted his time at Naples in festivals and triumphs on account of his past successes, or was fondly dreaming of future conquests in the East, to the empire of which he now aspired, they formed against him a powerful combination of almost all the Italian states, supported by the emperor Maximilian, and Ferdinand, King of Aragon. The union of so man}' powers, who suspended or forgot all their particulai animosities that they might act in concert against an enemy who had become formidable to them all, awakened Charles from his thoughtless security. He saw now no prospect of safety but in returning to France. An army of thirty thousand men, assembled by the allies, was ready to obstruct his march ; and though the French, with a daring courage which more than countervailed their inferiority in number, broke through that great body and gained a victory which opened to their monarch a safe passage into his own territories, he was stripped of all his conquests in Italy in as short a time as it had taken to acquire them ; and the political system in that country resumed the same appearance as before his invasion. The sudden and decisive effect of this confederacy seems to have instructed the princes and statesmen of Italy as much as the irruption of the French had dis- concerted and alarmed them. They had extended, on this occasion, to the affairs of Europe, the maxims of that political science which had hitherto been applied only to regulate the operations of the petty states in SECTION ii.] STATE OF EUROPE. 107 their own country. They had discovered the method of preventing any monarch from rising to such a degree of power as was inconsistent with the general liberty, and had manifested the importance of attending to that great secret in modern policy, the preservation of a proper distribution of power among all the members of the system into which the states of Europe are formed. During all the wars of which Italy from that time was the theatre, and amidst the hostile operations which the imprudence of Louis XII. and the ambition of Ferdinand of Aragon carried on in that country, with little interruption, from the close of the fifteenth century to that period at which the subsequent history commences, the maintaining a proper balance of power between the contending parties became the great object of attention to the statesmen of Italy. Nor was the idea confined to them. Self-preservation taught other powers to adopt it. It grew to be fashionable and uni- versal. From this era we can trace the progress of that intercourse between nations which has linked the powers of Europe so closely together, and can discern the operations of that provident policy which during peace guards against remote and contingent dangers, and in war has prevented rapid and destructive con- quests. This was not the only effect of the operations which the great powers of Europe carried on in Italy. They contributed to render general such a change as the French had begun to make in the state of their troops, and obliged all the princes who appeared on this new theatre of action to put the military force of their kingdoms on an establishment similar to that of France. When the seat of war came to be remote from the countries which maintained the contest, the service of the feudal vassals ceased to be of any use, and the necessity of employing soldiers regularly trained to 108 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION n. arms and kept in constant pay came at once to be evident. When Charles VIII. marched into Italy, his cavalry was entirely composed of those companies of gendarmes embodied by Charles VII. and continued by Louis XI. ; his infantry consisted partly of Swiss, hired of the Cantons, and partly of Gascons, armed and dis- ciplined after the Swiss model. To these Louis XII. added a body of Germans, well known in the wars of Italy by the name of the black bands. But neither of these monarchs made any account of the feudal militia, or ever had recourse to that military force which they might have commanded in virtue of the ancient institu- tions in their kingdom. Maximilian and Ferdinand, as soon as they began to act in Italy, employed similar instruments, and trusted the execution of their plans entirely to mercenary troops. This innovation in the military system was quickly followed by another, which the custom of employing Swiss in the Italian wars was the occasion of intro- ducing. The arms and discipline of the Swiss were different from those of other European nations. During their long and violent struggles in defence of their liberties against the house of Austria, whose armies, like those of other considerable princes, consisted chiefly of heavy-armed cavalry, the Swiss found that their poverty, and the small number of gentlemen residing in their country, at that time barren and ill cultivated, put it out of their power to bring into the field any body of horse capable of facing the enemy. Necessity compelled them to place all their confidence in infantry ; and, in order to render it capable of with- standing the shock of cavalry, they gave the soldiers breastplates and helmets as defensive armour, together with long spears, halberds, and heavy swords as weapons of defence. They formed them into large battalions, ranged in deep and close array, so that they could SECTION n.] STATE OF EUROPE. 100 present on every side a formidable front to the enemy. 10 The men-at-arms could make no impression on the solid strength of such a body. It repulsed the Aus- trians in all their attempts to conquer Switzerland. It broke the Burgundian gendarmerie, which was scarcely inferior to that of France, either in number or reputa- tion ; and when first called to act in Italy, it bore down, by its irresistible force, every enemy that attempted to oppose it. These repeated proofs of the decisive effect of infantry, exhibited on such conspicuous occasions, restored that service to reputation, and gradually re- established the opinion, which had been long exploded, of its superior importance in the operations of war. But, the glory which the Swiss had acquired having inspired them with such high ideas of their own prowess and consequence as frequently rendered them mutinous and insolent, the princes who employed them became weary of depending on the caprice of foreign mer- cenaries, and began to turn their attention towards the improvement of their national infantry. The German powers, having the command of men whom nature has endowed with that steady courage and persevering strength which form them to be soldiers, soon modelled their troops in such a manner that they vied with the Swiss both in discipline and valour. The French monarchs, though more slowly and with greater difficulty, accustomed the impetuous spirit of their people to subordination and discipline, and were at such pains to render their national infantry respect- able that as early as the reign of Louis XII. several gentlemen of high rank had so far abandoned their ancient ideas as to condescend to enter into that service. 11 The Spaniards, whose situation made it difficult to lu Machiavel's Art of War, b. ii. " Brant6me, torn. x. p. 18. chap. ii. p. 451. M&n. de Fleuranges, p. 143. 110 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION n. employ any other than their national troops in the southern parts of Italy, which was the chief scene of their operations in that country, not only adopted the Swiss discipline, but improved upon it, by mingling a proper number of soldiers, armed with heavy muskets, in their battalions, and thus formed that famous body of infantry which during a century and a half was the admiration and terror of all Europe. The Italian states gradually diminished the number of their cavalry and, in imitation of their more powerful neighbours, brought the strength of their armies to consist in foot-soldiers. From this period the nations of Europe have carried on war with forces more adapted to every species of service, more capable of acting in every country, and better fitted both for making conquests and for preserving them. As their efforts in Italy led the people of Europe to these improvements in the art of war, they gave them likewise the first idea of the expense with which it is accompanied when extensive or of long continuance, and accustomed every nation to the burden of such impositions as are necessary for supporting it. While the feudal policy subsisted in full vigour, while armies were composed of military vassals called forth to attack some neighbouring power and to perform in a short campaign the services which they owed to their sove- reign, the expense of war was extremely moderate. A small subsidy enabled a prince to begin and to finish his greatest military operations. But when Italy became the theatre on which the powers of Europe contended for superiority, the preparations requisite for such a distant expedition, the pay of armies kept con- stantly on foot, their subsistence in a foreign country, the sieges to be undertaken, and the towns to be de- fended, swelled the charges of war immensely, and, by creating demands unknown in less active times, mul- SECTION ii.] STATE OF EUROPE. HI tiplied taxes in every kingdom. The progress of ambi- tion, however, was so rapid, and princes extended their operations so fast, that it was impossible at first to establish funds proportional to the increase of expense which these occasioned. When Charles YIII. invaded Naples, the sums requisite for carrying on that enterprise so far exceeded those which France had been accustomed to contribute for the support of government that before he reached the frontiers of Italy his treasury was ex- hausted, and the domestic resources of which his exten- sive prerogative gave him the command were at an end. As he durst not venture to lay any imposition on his people, oppressed already with the weight of unusual burdens, the only expedient that remained was to borrow of the Genoese as much money as might enable him to continue his march. But he could not obtain a sufficient sum without consenting to pay annually the exorbitant interest of forty-two livres for every hundred that he received. 12 We may observe the same disproportion between the efforts and revenues of other princes, his contemporaries. From this period taxes went on in- creasing ; and during the reign of Charles Y. such sums were levied in every state as would have appeared enor- mous at the close of the fifteenth century, and gradually prepared the way for the still more exorbitant exactions of modern times. The last transaction, previous to the reign of Charles Y., that merits attention on account of its influence upon the state of Europe, is the league of Cambray. To humble the republic of Yenice and to divide its terri- tories was the object of all the powers who united in this confederacy. The civil constitution of Yenice, established on a firm basis, had suffered no considerable alteration for several centuries ; during which the senate conducted its affairs by maxims of policy no less prudent 12 M&noires de Comines, lib. vii. c. 5, p. 440. 112 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION n. than vigorous, and adhered to these with a uniform, consistent spirit which gave that commonwealth great advantage over other states, whose views and measures changed as often as the form of their government, or the persons who administered it. By these unintermitted exertions of wisdom and valour the Venetians enlarged the dominions of their commonwealth until it became the most considerable power in Italy; while their extensive commerce, the useful and curious manufac- tures which they carried on, together with the large share which they had acquired of the lucrative commerce with the East, rendered Yenice the most opulent state in Europe. The power of the Venetians was the object of terror to their Italian neighbours. Their wealth was viewed with envy by the greatest monarchs, who could not vie with many of their private citizens in the magnificence of their buildings, in the richness of their dress and furniture, or in splendour and elegance of living. 1 ' Julius II., whose ambition was superior, and his abili- ties equal, to those of any pontiff who ever sat on the papal throne, conceived the idea of this league against the Venetians, and endeavoured, by applying to those passions which I have mentioned, to persuade other princes to join it. By working upon the fears of the Italian powers, and upon the avarice of several monarchs beyond the Alps, he induced them, in concurrence with other causes, which it is not my province to explain, to form one of the most powerful confederacies that Europe had ever beheld, against those haughty repub- licans. The emperor, the king of France, the king of Aragon, and the pope, were principals in the league of Cambray, to which almost all the princes of Italy acceded, the least considerable of them hoping for some share in the 13 Heliani Oratio, apud Goldastum, in Polit, Imperial., p. 980. SECTION H.] STATE OF EUROPE. 113 spoils of a state which they deemed to be now devoted to destruction. The Venetians might have diverted this storm, or have broken its force ; but, with a presump- tuous rashness to which there is nothing similar in the course of their history, they waited its approach. The impetuous valour of the French rendered ineffectual all their precautions for the safety of the republic ; and the fatal battle of Ghiarraddada entirely ruined the army on which they relied for defence. Julius seized all the towns which they held in the ecclesiastical territories. Ferdinand re-annexed the towns of which they had got possession on the coast of Calabria to his Neapolitan dominions. Maximilian, at the head of a powerful army, advanced towards Venice on the one side. The French pushed their conquests on the other. The Venetians, surrounded by so many enemies, and left without one ally, sunk from the height of presumption to the depths of despair, abandoned all their territories on the continent, and shut themselves up in their capital, as their last refuge and the only place which they hoped to preserve. This rapid success, however, proved fatal to the con- federacy. The members of it, whose union continued while they were engaged in seizing their prey, began to feel their ancient jealousies and animosities revive as soon as they had a prospect of dividing it. When the Venetians observed these symptoms of distrust and alienation, a ray of hope broke in upon them : the spirit natural to their counsels returned ; they resumed such wisdom and firmness as made some atonement for their former imprudence and dejection ; they recovered part of the territory which they had lost ; they appeased the pope and Ferdinand by well-timed concessions in their favour ; and at length dissolved the confederacy which had brought their commonwealth to the brink of ruin. Julius, elated with beholding the effects of a league VOU I. I 114 A Y1EW OP -THE [SECTION n. which he himself had planned, and imagining that nothing was too arduous for him to undertake, conceived the idea of expelling every foreign power out of Italy, and bent all the force of his mind towards executing a scheme so well suited to his enterprising genius. He directed his first attack against the French, who, on many accounts, were more odious to the Italians than any of the foreigners who had acquired dominion in their country. By his activity and address, he pre- vailed on most of the powers who had joined in the league of Cambray to turn their arms against the king of France, their former ally, and engaged Henry VIII., who had lately ascended the throne of England, to favour their operations by invading France. Louis XII. resisted all the efforts of this formidable and unexpected confederacy with undaunted fortitude. Hostilities were V carried on, during several campaigns, in Italy, on the frontiers of Spain, and in Picardy, with alternate suc- cess. Exhausted, at length, by the variety as well as extent of his operations, unable to withstand a con- federacy which brought against him superior force, con- ducted with wisdom and acting with perseverance, Louis found it necessary to conclude separate treaties of peace with his enemies ; and the war terminated with the loss of everything which the French had acquired in Italy except the castle of Milan and a few inconsiderable towns in that duchy. The various negotiations carried on during this busy period, and the different combinations formed among powers hitherto little connected with each other, greatly increased that intercourse among the nations of Europe which I have mentioned as one effect of the events in the fifteenth century ; while the greatness of the objects at which different nations aimed, the distant expeditions which they undertook, as well as the length and obstinacy of the contest in which they engaged, obliged them to ii.] STATE OF EUROPE. 115 exert themselves with a vigour and perseverance un- known in the preceding ages. Those active scenes which the following history will exhibit, as well as the variety and importance of those transactions which distinguish the period to which it extends, are not to be ascribed solely to the ambition, to the abilities, or to the rivalship of Charles Y. and of Francis I. The kingdoms of Europe had arrived at such a degree of improvement in the internal adminis- tration of government, and princes had acquired such command of the national force which was to be exerted in foreign wars, that they were in a condition to enlarge the sphere of their operations, to multiply their claims and pretensions, and to increase the vigour of their efforts. Accordingly, the sixteenth century opened with the certain prospect of its abounding in great and interesting events. SECTION III. VIEW OF THE POLITICAL CONSTITUTION OF THE PRIN- CIPAL STATES IN EUEOPE AT THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY. Italy at the Beginning of the Sixteenth Century. The Papal Power. Alexander VI. and Julius II. Defects in Ecclesiastical Govern- ments. Venice : its Rise and Progress ; its Naval Power and its Commerce. Florence. Naples and Sicily. Contest for its Crown. Duchy of Milan. Ludovico Sibrza. Spain; conquered by the Vandals and by the Moors ; gradually reconquered by the Christians. Marriage of Ferdinand and Isabella. The Royal Prerogative. Constitution of Aragon and of Castile. Internal Disorders. " The Holy Brotherhood." France ; its Constitution and Government. The Power of its Early Kings. Government becomes purely Monarchical, though restrained by the Nobles and the Parliaments. The German Empire. Power of the Nobles and of the Clergy. Contests between the Popes and the Emperors. Decline of Imperial Authority. Total Change of Government. Maximilian. The real Power and Revenues of the Emperors, contrasted with their Pre- tensions. Complication of Difficulties. Origin of the Turkish Empire ; its Character. The Janizaries. Solyman. HAVING thus enumerated the principal causes and events the influence of which was felt in every part of Europe, and contributed either to improve internal order and police in its various states, or to enlarge the sphere of their activity, by giving them more entire command of the force with which foreign operations are carried on, nothing farther seems requisite for preparing my readers to enter, with full information, upon perusing the history of Charles V., but to give a view of the political constitution and form of civil government in each of the nations which acted any considerable part during that period. For as the institutions and events which I have endeavoured to illustrate formed the people of Europe to resemble each other, and conducted them SECTION in.] A VIEW OF THE STATE OF EUEOPE. 117 from barbarism to refinement in the same path and by nearly equal steps, there were other circumstances which occasioned a difference in their political establishments, and gave rise to those peculiar modes of government which have produced such variety in the character and genius of nations. It is no less necessary to become acquainted with the latter than to have contemplated the former. Without a distinct knowledge of the peculiar form and genius of civil government in each state, a great part of its trans- actions must appear altogether mysterious and inexpli- cable. The historians of particular countries, as they seldom extended their views farther than to the amuse- ment or instruction of their fellow-citizens, by whom they might presume that all their domestic customs and institutions were perfectly understood, have often neglected to descend into such details with respect to these as are sufficient to convey to foreigners full light and information concerning the occurrences which they relate. But a history which comprehends the transac- tions of so many different countries would be extremely imperfect without a previous survey of the constitution and political state of each. It is from his knowledge of these that the reader must draw those principles which will enable him to judge with discernment and to decide with certainty concerning the conduct of nations. A minute detail, however, of the peculiar forms and regulations in every country would lead to deductions of immeasurable length. To sketch out the great lines which distinguish and characterise each government is all that the nature of my present work will admit of, and all that is necessary to illustrate the events which it records. At the opening of the sixteenth century the political aspect of Italy was extremely different from that of any other part of E irope. Instead of those extensive 118 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION in. monarchies which occupied the rest of the continent, that delightful country was parcelled out among many small states, each of which possessed sovereign and independent jurisdiction. The only monarchy in Italy was that of Naples. The dominion of the popes was of a peculiar species, to which there is nothing similar either in ancient or modern times. In Venice, Florence, and Genoa, a republican form of government was established. Milan was subject to sovereigns, who had assumed no higher title than that of dukes. The pope was the first of these powers in dignity, and not the least considerable by the extent of his territories. In the primitive church, the jurisdiction of bishops was equal and co-ordinate. They derived, perhaps, some degree of consideration from the dignity of the see in which they presided. They possessed, however, no real authority or pre-eminence but what they acquired by superior abilities or superior sanctity. As Borne had so long been the seat of empire and the capital of the world, its bishops were on that account entitled to respect ; they received it ; but during several ages they received, and even claimed, nothing more. From these humble beginnings they advanced with such adven- turous and well-directed ambition that they established a spiritual dominion over the minds and sentiments of men, to which all Europe submitted with implicit obedience. Their claim of universal jurisdiction, as heads of the Church, and their pretensions to infalli- bility in their decisions, as successors of St. Peter, are as chimerical as they are repugnant to the genius of the Christian religion. But on these foundations the super- stition and credulity of mankind enabled them to erect an amazing superstructure. In all ecclesiastical con- troversies their decisions were received as the infallible oracles of truth. Nor was the plenitude of their power confined solely to what was spiritual : they dethroned SECTION in.] STATE OF EUROPE. 119 monarchs, disposed of 'crowns, absolved subjects from the obedience due to their sovereigns, and laid kingdoms under interdicts. There was not a state in Europe which had not been disquieted by their ambition ; there was not a throne which they had not shaken, nor a prince who did not tremble at their power. Nothing was wanting to render this empire absolute, and to establish it on the ruins of all civil authority, but that the popes should have possessed such a degree of temporal power as was sufficient to second and enforce their spiritual decrees. Happily for mankind, at the time when their spiritual jurisdiction was most extensive and most revered, their secular dominion was extremely limited. They were powerful pontiffs, formidable at a distance ; but they were petty princes, without any con- siderable domestic force. They had early endeavoured, indeed, to acquire territory by arts similar to those which they had employed in extending their spiritual jurisdiction. Under pretence of a donation from Con- stuntine, and of another from Charlemagne or his father Pepin, they attempted to take possession of some towns adjacent to Rome. But these donations were fictitious and availed them little. The benefactions for which they were indebted to the credulity of the Norman adventurers who conquered Naples, and to the super- stition of the Countess Matilda, were real, and added ample domains to the holy see. But the power of the popes did not increase in pro- portion to the extent of territory which they had acquired. In the dominions annexed to the holy see, as well as in those subject to other princes in Italy, the sovereign of a state was far from having the command of a force which it contained. During the turbulence and confusion of the Middle Ages, the powerful nobility or leaders of popular factions in Italy had seized the government of different towns ; and, after strengthening 120 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION in. their fortifications and taking a body of mercenaries into pay, they aspired at independence. The territory which the Church had gained was filled with petty lords of this kind, who left the pope hardly the shadow of dominion. As these usurpations almost annihilated the papal power in the greater part of the towns subject to the Church, the Eoman barons frequently disputed the authority of the popes, even in Eome itself. In the twelfth century an opinion began to be propagated, " That as the function of ecclesiastics was purely spiritual, they ought to possess no property, and to claim no temporal jurisdiction, but, according to the laudable example of their predecessors in the primitive church, should subsist wholly upon their tithes, or upon the voluntary oblations of the people." x This doctrine being addressed to men who had beheld the scandalous manner in which the avarice and ambition of the clergy had prompted them to contend for wealth and to exer- cise power, they listened to it with fond attention. The Eoman barons, who had felt most sensibly the rigour of ecclesiastical oppression, adopted these sentiments with such ardour that they set themselves instantly to shake off the yoke. They endeavoured to restore some image of their ancient liberty, by reviving the institution of the Eoman senate, in which they vested supreme autho- rity ; committing the executive power sometimes to one chief senator, sometimes to two, and sometimes to a magistrate dignified with the name of The Patrician. The popes exerted them with vigour, in order to check this dangerous encroachment on their jurisdiction. One of them, finding all his endeavours ineffectual, was so much mortified that extreme grief cut short his days. Another, having ventured to attack the senators at the head of some armed men, was mortally wounded in the 1 Otto Frisingensis de Gestis Frider. Imp., lib. ii. cap. 10. SECTION in.] ^TATE OF EUROPE. 121 fray. 2 During a considerable period, the power of the popes, before which the greatest monarchs in Europe trembled, was circumscribed within such narrow limits in their own capital, that they durst hardly exert any act of authority without the permission and concurrence of the senate. Encroachments were made upon the papal sovereignty, not only by the usurpations of the Eoman nobility, but by the mutinous spirit of the people. During seventy years of the fourteenth century the popes fixed their residence in Avignon. The inhabitants of Rome, accus- tomed to consider themselves as the descendants of the people who had conquered the world and had given laws to it, were too high-spirited to submit with patience to the delegated authority of those persons to whom the popes committed the government of the city. On many occasions they opposed the execution of the papal man- dates, and on the slightest appearance of innovation or oppression they were ready to take arms in defence of their own immunities. Towards the middle of the fourteenth century, being instigated by Nicholas Rienzo, a man of low birth and a seditious spirit, but of popular eloquence and an enterprising ambition, they drove all the nobility out of the city, established a democratical form of government, elected Rienzo tribune of the people, and invested him with extensive authority. But though the frantic proceedings of the tribune soon over- turned this new system, though the government of Rome was reinstated in its ancient form, yet every fresh attack contributed to weaken the papal jurisdiction ; and the turbulence of the people concurred with the spirit of independence among the nobility in circumscribing it more and more. 3 Gregory YII. and other domineering " Otto Frising., Chron., lib. vii. d'ltalia, vol. ix. pp. 398-404. cap. 27, 31. Id. de Gest. Frid., 3 Histoire Florentine de Giov. lib. L c. 27. Muratori, Annali Villani, liv. xii. c. 89, 104, ap 1 22 A VIEW OP THE [SECTION in. pontiffs accomplished those great things which rendered them so formidable to the emperors with whom they contended, not by the force of their arms or by the extent of their power, but by the dread of their spiritual censures and by the effect of their intrigues, which ex- cited rivals and called forth enemies against every prince whom they wished to depress or to destroy. Many attempts were made by the popes, not only to humble those usurpers who lorded it over the cities in the ecclesiastical state, but to break the turbulent spirit of the Eoman people. These were long unsuccessful. But at last Alexander VI., with a policy no less artful than flagitious, subdued or extirpated most of the great Eoman barons, and rendered the popes masters of their own dominions. The enterprising ambition of Julius II. added conquests of no inconsiderable value to the patrimony of St. Peter. Thus the popes, by degrees, became powerful temporal princes. Their territories, in the age of Charles Y., were of greater extent than at present; their country seems to have been better cul- tivated, as well as more populous ; and, as they drew large contributions from every part of Europe, their revenues far exceeded those of the neighbouring powers, and rendered them capable of more sudden and vigorous efforts. The genius of the papal government, however, was better adapted to the exercise of spiritual dominion than of temporal power. With respect to the former, all its maxims were steady and invariable ; every new pontiff adopted the plan of his predecessor. By edu- cation and habit, ecclesiastics were so formed that the character of the individual was sunk in that of the profession, and the passions of the man were sacrificed Murat., Script. Rerum Ital., vol. etc. Hist, de Nic. Eienzy, par xiii. Vita di Cola di Rienzo, ap. M. de Boispre'aux, p. 91, etc, -at,, Antiq. Ttal., vol. iii. p. 399, SECTION in.] STATE OF EUROPE. 123 to the interest and honour of the order. The hands which held the reins of administration might change, but the spirit which conducted them was always the same. While the measures of other governments fluc- tuated, and the objects at which they aimed varied, the Church kept one end in view ; and to this unrelaxing constancy of pursuit it was indebted for its success in the boldest attempts ever made by human ambition. But in their civil administration the popes followed no such uniform or consistent plan. There, as in other governments, the character, the passions, and the in- terest of the person who had the supreme direction of affairs occasioned a variation both in objects and measures. As few prelates reached the summit of ecclesiastical dignity until they were far advanced in life, a change of masters was more frequent in the papal dominions than in other states, and the political system was, of course, less stable and permanent. Every pope was eager to make the most of the short period during which he had the prospect of enjoying power, in order to aggrandize his own family and to attain his private ends ; and it was often the first business of his successor to undo all that he had done, and to overturn what he had established. As ecclesiastics were trained to pacific arts, and early initiated in the mysteries of that policy by which the court of Eome extended or supported its spiritual dominion, the popes, in the conduct of their temporal affairs, were apt to follow the same maxims, and in all their measures were more ready to employ the refine- ments of intrigue than the force of arms. It was in the papal court that address and subtlety in negotiation became a science ; and during the sixteenth century Eome was considered as the school in which it might be best acquired. As the decorum of their ecclesiastical character pre- ]24 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION in vented the popes from placing themselves at the head of their armies or from taking the command in person of the military force in their dominions, they were afraid to arm their subjects ; and in all their operations, whether offensive or defensive, they trusted entirely to mercenary troops. As their power and dominions could not descend to their posterity, the popes were less solicitous than other princes to form or to encourage schemes of piiblic utility and improvement. Their tenure was only for a short life; present advantage was what they chiefly studied ; to squeeze and to amass, rather than to ame- liorate, was their object. They erected, perhaps, some work of ostentation, to remain as a monument of their pontificate ; they found it necessary, at some times, to establish useful institutions, in order to soothe and silence the turbulent populace of Kome; but plans of general benefit of their subjects, framed with a view to futurity, were rarely objects of attention in the papal policy. The patrimony of St. Peter was worse governed than any part of Europe ; and though a generous pontiff might suspend for a little, or counteract, the effects of those vices which are peculiar to the adminis- tration of ecclesiastics, the disease not only remained without remedy, but has gone on increasing from age to age ; and the decline of the state has kept pace with its progress. One circumstance farther, concerning the papal go- vernment, is so singular as to merit attention. As the spiritual supremacy and temporal power were united in one person, and uniformly aided each other in their operations, they became so blended together that it was difficult to separate them, even in imagination. The potentates who found it necessary to oppose the measures which the popes pursued as temporal princes could not easily divest themselves of the reverence 8KUTION III.] STATE OF EUROPE. 125 which they imagined to be due to them as heads of the Church and vicars of Jesus Christ. It was with reluctance that they could be brought to a rupture with the head of the Church ; they were unwilling to push their operations against him to extremity ; they listened eagerly to the first overtures of accommoda- tion, and were anxious to procure it almost upon any terms. Their consciousness of this encouraged the enterprising pontiffs who filled the papal throne about the beginning of the sixteenth century to engage in schemes seemingly the most extravagant. They trusted that, if their temporal power was not sufficient to carry them through with success, . the respect paid to their spiritual dignity would enable them to extricate them- selves with facility and with honour. 4 But when popes came to take part more frequently in the contests among princes, and to engage as principals or auxiliaries in every war kindled in Europe, this veneration for their sacred character began to abate ; and striking instances will occur in the following history of its being almost totally extinct. 4 The manner in which Louis XII. of France undertook and carried on war against Julius II. remarkably illustrates this observation. Louis solemnly consulted the clergy of France whether it was lawful to take arms against a pope who had wantonly kindled war in Europe, and whom neither the faith of treaties, nor gratitude for favours received, nor the decorum of his character, could restrain from the most violent actions to which the lust of power prompts ambitious princes. Though his clergy autho- rised the war, yet Anne of Bretagne, his queen, entertained scruples with regard to the lawfulness of it. The king himself, from some superstition, of the same kind, carried it on faintly, and, upon every fresh ad- vantage, renewed his propositions of peace. (Me'ze'ray, Hist, de France, fol. edit., 1685, torn. i. p. 852.) I shall produce another proof of this reverence for the papal character, still more striking. Guicciardini, the most sagacious, perhaps, of all modern historians, and the boldest in painting the vices and ambition of the popes, represents the death of Migliau, a Spanish officer who was killed during the siege of Naples, as a punishment inflicted on him by Heaven on account of his having opposed the setting of Clement VII. at liberty. Guicciar- dini, Istoria d'ltalia, Genev., 1645, voL ii. lib. 18, p. 467. 126 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION in. Of all the Italian powers, the republic of Venice, next to the papal see, was most connected with the rest of Europe. The rise of that commonwealth during the inroads of the Huns in the fifth century, the sin- gular situation of its capital in the small isles of the Adriatic gulf, and the more singular form of its civil constitution, are generally known. If we view the Venetian government as calculated for the order of nobles alone, its institutions may be pronounced excel- lent ; the deliberative, legislative, and executive powers are so admirably distributed and adjusted that it must be regarded as a perfect model of political wisdom. But if we consider it as formed for a numerous body of people subject to its jurisdiction, it will appear a rigid and partial aristocracy, which lodges all power in the hands of a few members of the community, while it degrades and oppresses the rest. The spirit of government in a commonwealth of this species was, of course, timid and jealous. The Vene- tian nobles distrusted their own subjects, and were afraid of allowing them the use of arms. They encou- raged among them arts of industry and commerce, they employed them in manufactures and in navigation, but never admitted them into the troops which the state kept in its pay. The military force of the republic consisted entirely of foreign mercenaries. The com- mand of these was never trusted to noble Venetians, lest they should acquire such influence over the army as might endanger the public liberty, or become accus- tomed to the exercise of such power as would make them unwilling to return to the condition of private citizens. A soldier of fortune was placed at the head of the armies of the commonweath ; and to obtain that honour was the great object of the Italian condot 'fieri, or leaders of bands, who in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries made a trade of war and raised and hired out SECTION in.] STATE OF EUBOPE. l*^ soldiers to different states. But the same suspicious policy which induced the Venetians to employ these adventurers preventing their placing entire confidence in them. Two noblemen, appointed by the senate, accompanied their army when it took the field, with the appellation of proveditori, and, like the field deputies of the Dutch republic in latter times, observed all the motions of the general and checked and controlled him in all his operations. A commonwealth with such civil and military insti- tutions was not formed to make conquests. While its subjects were disarmed, and its nobles excluded from military command, it carried on its warlike enterprises with great disadvantage. This ought to have taught the Venetians to rest satisfied with making self-preser- vation, and the enjoyment of domestic security, the objects of their policy. But republics are apt to be seduced by the spirit of ambition, as well as kings. When the Venetians so far forgot the interior defects in their government as to aim at extensive conquests, the fatal blow which they received in the war excited by the league of Cambray convinced them of the im- prudence and danger of making violent efforts in opposi- tion to the genius and tendency of their constitution. It is not, however, by its military, but by its nayal and commercial power that the importance of the Venetian commonwealth must be estimated. The latter constituted the real force and nerves of the state. The jealousy of government did not extend to this depart- ment. Nothing was apprehended from this quarter that could prove formidable to liberty. The senate encou- raged the nobles to trade, and to serve on board the fleet. They became merchants and admirals. They increased the wealth of their country by their industry. They added to its dominions by the valour with which they conducted its naval armaments. 1 28 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION m. Commerce was an inexhaustible source of opulence lo the Venetians. All the nations in Europe depended upon them, not only for the commodities of the East, but for various manufactures fabricated by them alone, or finished with a dexterity and elegance unknown in other countries. From this extensive commerce the state derived such immense supplies as concealed those vices in its constitution which I have mentioned, and enabled it to keep on foot such armies as were not only an over-match for the force which any of its neighbours could bring into the field, but were sufficient to con- tend, for some time, with the powerful monarchs be- yond the Alps. During its struggles with the princes united against it by the league at Cambray, the re- public levied sums which even in the present age would be deemed considerable ; and while the king of France paid the exorbitant interest which I have mentioned for the money advanced to him, and the emperor, eager to borrow, but destitute of credit, was known by the name of Maximilian the Moneyless, the Venetians raised whatever sums they pleased, at the moderate premium of five in the hundred. 5 The constitution of Florence was perfectly the re- verse of the Venetian. It partook as much of demo- cratical turbulence and licentiousness, as the other of aristocratical rigour. Florence, however, was a com- mercial, not a military democracy. The nature of its institutions was favourable to commerce, and the genius of the people was turned towards it. The vast wealth which the family of Medici had acquired by trade, together with the magnificence, the generosity, and the virtue of the first Cosmo, gave him such an as- cendant over the affections as well as the counsels of his countrymen that though the forms of popular 5 Hist, de la Ligue faite &, Cam- Sandi, Storia civile Veneziana, liv. bray, par M. 1'Abbd du Bos, liv. v. viii. c. 16, p. 891, etc. SECTION m.] STATE OP EUROPE. 129 government were preserved, though the various de- partments of administration were filled by magistral es distinguished by the ancient names and elected in the usual manner, he was in reality the head of the com- monwealth, and in the station of a private citizen he possessed supreme authority. Cosmo transmitted a considerable degree of this power to his descendants ; and during a greater part of the fifteenth century the political state of Florence was extremely singular. The appearance of republican government subsisted, the people were passionately attached to it, and on some occasions contended warmly for their privileges ; and yet they permitted a single family to assume the direc- tion of their affairs, almost as absolutely as if it had been formally invested with sovereign power. The jealousy of the Medici concurred with the commercial spirit of the Florentines in putting the military force of the republic upon the same footing with that of the other Italian states. The troops which the Florentines employed in their wars consisted almost entirely of mercenary soldiers, furnished by the condottieri, or leaders of bands, whom they took into their pay. In the kingdom of Naples, to which the sovereignty of the island of Sicily was annexed, the feudal govern- ment was established in the same form and with the same defects as in the other nations of Europe. The frequent and violent revolutions which happened in that monarchy had considerably increased these defects, and rendered them more intolerable. The succession to the crown of Naples had been so often interrupted or altered, and so many princes of foreign blood had at different periods obtained possessior of the throne, that the Neapolitan nobility had lost iu a great measure that attachment to the family of their sovereigns^ as well as that reverence for their persons, which in other feudal kingdoms contributed to set some bounds to the en- 130 A VIEW OF THE [SECTIOX in croachments of the barons upon the royal prerogative and power. At the same time, the different pretenders to the crown being obliged to court the barons who adhered to them and on whose support they depended for the success of their claims, they augmented their privileges by liberal concessions and connived at theii boldest usurpations. Even when seated on the throne, it was dangerous for a prince who held his sceptre by a disputed title to venture on any step towards extend- ing his own power or circumscribing that of the nobles. From all these causes, the kingdom of Naples was the most turbulent of any in Europe, and the authority of its monarchs the least extensive. Though Ferdinand I., who began his reign in the year 1468, attempted to break the power of the aristocracy, though his son Alphonso, that he might crush it at once by cutting off the leaders of greatest reputation and influence among the Neapolitan barons, ventured to commit one of the most perfidious and cruel actions recorded in history, the order of nobles was nevertheless more exasperated than humbled by their measures. 6 The resentment which these outrages excited was so violent, and the power of the malcontent nobles was still so formidable, that to these may be ascribed, in a great degree, the ease and rapidity with which Charles VIII. conquered the king- dom of Naples. 7 The event that gave rise to the violent contests con- cerning the succession to the crown of Naples and Sicily, which brought so many calamities upon these kingdoms, happened in the thirteenth century. Upon the death of the emperor Frederic II., Manfred, his natural son, aspiring to the Neapolitan throne, murdered his brother, the emperor Conrad (if we may believe contemporary historians), and by that crime obtained * Giannone, book xxviii. chap. 2, 7 Id., ibid. p. 414. vol. ii. p. -410, etc. SECTION- in.] STATE Off EUROPE. 131 possession of it. 8 The popes, from their implacable enmity to the house of Swabia, not only refused to recognise Manfred's title, but endeavoured to excite against him some rival capable of wresting the sceptre out of his hand. Charles, count of Anjou, the brother of St. Louis, king of France, undertook this; and he received from the popes the investiture of the kingdom of Naples and Sicily as a fief held of the holy see. The count of Anjou's efforts were crowned with suc- cess ; Manfred fell in battle ; and he took possession of the vacant throne. But soon after, Charles sullied the glory which he had acquired by the injustice and cruelty with which he put to death, by the hands of the executioner, Conradin, the last prince of the house of Swabia, and the rightful heir of the Neapolitan crown. That gallant young prince asserted his title, to the last, with a courage worthy of a better fate. On the scaffold, he declared Peter, at that time prince, and soon after king, of Aragon, who had married Manfred's only daughter, his heir ; and, throwing his glove among the people, he entreated that it might be carried to Peter, as the symbol by which he conveyed all his rights to him. 9 The desire of avenging the insult offered to royalty by the death of Conradin concurred with his own ambition in prompting Peter to take arms in support of the title which he had acquired. From that period during almost two centuries the houses of Aragon and Anjou contended for the crown of Naples. Amidst a succession of revolutions more rapid, as well as of crimes more atrocious, than what occur in the history of almost any other kingdom, monarchs some- times of the Aragonese line and sometimes of the An- gevin were seated on the throne. At length the princes of the house of Aragon obtained such firm possession of 8 Struv., Corp. Hist. Germ., L ' Giannone, book xix. ch 4, 2. 481. Giannone, book xviii. ch. 5. K 2 132 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION m. this long-disputed inheritance that they transmitted it quietly to a bastard branch of their family. 10 [1434.] The race of the Angevin kings, however, was not extinct, nor had they relinquished their title to the Neapolitan crown. The count of Maine and Provence, the heir of this family, conveyed all his rights and preten- sions to Louis XI. and to his successors. Charles VIII. , as I have already related, crossed the Alps at the head of a powerful army in order to prosecute his claim with a degree of vigour far superior to that which the princes from whom he derived it had been capable of exerting. The rapid progress of his arms in Italy, as well as the short time during which he enjoyed the fruits of his success, have already been mentioned, and are well known. Frederic, the heir of the illegitimate branch of the Aragonese family, soon recovered the throne of which Charles had dispossessed him. Louis XII. and Ferdinand of Aragon united against this prince, whom both, though for different reasons, considered as a usurper and agreed to divide his dominions between them. Frederic, unable to resist the combined monarchs, each of whom was far his superior in power, resigned his sceptre. Louis and Ferdinand, though they had .concurred in making the conquest, differed about the division of it, and from allies became enemies. But Gonsalvo de Cordova, partly by the exertion of such military talents as gave him a just title to the appellation of the great captain, which the Spanish historians have bestowed upon him, and partly by such shameless and frequent violations of the most solemn engagements as leave an indelible stain on his memory, stripped the French of all that they possessed in the Neapolitan dominions, and secured the peaceable possession of them to his master. These, together with his other kingdoms, Ferdinand transmitted to his grandson, 10 Giannonc, book xxvi. ch. 2. SECTION IIL] STATE OF EUROPE. 133 Charles V., whose right to possess them, if not alto- gether uncontrovertible, seems at least to be as well founded as that which the kings of France set up in opposition to it. 11 There is nothing in the political constitution or interior government of the duchy of Milan so re- markable as to require a particular explanation. But as the right of succession to that fertile province was the cause or the pretext of almost all the wars car- ried on in Italy during the reign of Charles V., it is necessary to trace these disputes to their source, and to inquire into the pretensions of the various com- petitors. During the long and fierce contests excited in Italy by the violence of the Guelf and Ghibelline factious, the family of Visconti rose to great eminence among their fellow-citizens of Milan. As the Yisconti had adhered uniformly to the Ghibelline or imperial in- terest, they, by way of recompense, received from one emperor the dignity of perpetual vicars of the empire in Italy; 12 they were created, by another, dukes of Milan; and, together with that title, the possession of the city and its territories was bestowed upon them as an hereditary fief. 13 John, king of France, among other expedients for raising money which the calami- ties of his reign obliged him to employ, condescended to give one of his daughters in marriage to John Galeazzo Yisconti, the first duke of Milan, from whom he had received considerable sums. Valentine Vis- conti, one of the children of this marriage, married her cousin, Louis, duke of Orleans, the only brother of Charles VI. In their marriage-contract, which the 11 Droits des Hois de France au 12 Petrarch., Epist, ap. Struv., Royaume de Sicile. Me"moires de Corp., i. 625. Comines, edit, de Fresnoy, torn. iv. 13 Leibnit, Cod. Jur. Gent Di part ii. p. 5. plom., voL i p. 267. 134 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION m- pope confirmed, it was stipulated that upon failure of heirs male in the family of Visconti the Duchy of Milan should descend to the posterity of Yalentine and the duke of Orleans. That event took place. In the year 1447, Philip Maria, the last prince of the ducal family of Yisconti, died. Various competitors claimed the succession. Charles, duke of Orleans, pleaded his right to it founded on the marriage-contract of his mother, Yalentine Yisconti. Alfonso, king of Naples, claimed it in consequence of a will made by Philip Maria in his favour. The emperor contended that upon the extinction of male issue in the family of Yisconti the fief returned to the superior lord and ought to be re-annexed to the empire. The people of Milan, smitten with the love of liberty which in that age pre- vailed among the Italian states, declared against the dominion of any master, and established a republican form of government. But during the struggle among so many competitors, the prize for which they contended was seized by one from whom none of them apprehended any danger. Francis Sforza, the natural son of Jacomuzzo Sforza, whom his courage and abilities had elevated from the rank of a peasant to be one of the most eminent and powerful of the Italian condottierij having succeeded his father in the command of the adventurers who fol- lowed his standard, had married a natural daughter of the last duke of Milan. Upon this shadow of a title Francis founded his pretensions to the duchy, which he supported with such talents and valour as placed him at last on the ducal throne. The virtues, as well as abilities, with which he governed, inducing his subjects to forget the defects in his title, he transmitted his do- minions quietly to his son ; from whom they descended to his grandson. He was murdered by his grand-uncle Ludovico, gurnamed the Moor, who took possession of SECTION in.] STATE OF EUROPE. 135 the duchy; and his right to it was confirmed by the investiture of the emperor Maximilian, in the year 1494. 14 Louis XL, who took pleasure in depressing the princes of the blood, and who admired the political abilities of Francis Sforza, would not permit the duke of Orleans to take any step in prosecution of his right to the duchy of Milan. Ludovico the Moor kept up such a close connection with Charles VIII. that during the greater part of his reign the claim of the family of Orleans continued to lie dormant. But when the crown of France devolved on Louis XII., duke of Orleans, he instantly asserted the rights of his family with the ardour which it was natural to expect, and marched at the head of a powerful army to support them. Ludo- vico Sforza, incapable of contending with such a rival, was stripped of all his dominions in the space of a few days. The king, clad in the ducal robes, entered Milan in triumph; and soon after, Ludovico, having been betrayed by the Swiss in his pay, was sent a prisoner into France, and shut up in the castle of Loches, where he lay unpitied during the remainder of his days. In consequence of one of the singular revolutions which occur so frequently in the history of the Milanese, his son, Maximilian Sforza, was placed on the ducal throne, of which he kept possession dur- ing the reign of Louis XII. But his successor, Fran- cis I., was too high-spirited and enterprising tamely to relinquish his title. As soon as he was seated upon the throne, he prepared to invade the Milanese; and his right of succession to it appears, from this detail, to have been more natural and more just than that of any other competitor. [1512.] It is unnecessary to enter into any detail with re- 14 Ripalm., Hist. Mediol., lib. vi Du Mont, Corps. Diplom., torn, iii p. 654, ap. Struv., Corp., i. 930. p. ii. 333, ibid 136 A VIEW OP THE [SECTION in. spect to the form of government in Genoa, Parma, Modena, and the other inferior states of Italy. Their names, indeed, will often occur in the following his- tory. But the power of these states themselves was so inconsiderable that their fate depended little upon their own efforts; and the frequent revolutions which they underwent were brought about rather by the operations of the princes who attacked or defended them than by anything peculiar in their internal constitution. Of the great kingdoms on this side of the Alps, Spain is one of the most considerable ; and, as it was the hereditary domain of Charles V., as well as the chief source of his power and wealth, a distinct know- ledge of its political constitution is of capital importance towards understanding the transactions of his reign. The Yandals and Goths, who overturned the Eoman power in Spain, established a form of government in that country, and introduced customs and laws, per- fectly similar to those which were established in the rest of Europe by the other victorious tribes which acquired settlements there. For some time, society advanced, among the new inhabitants of Spain, by the same steps, and seemed to hold the same course, as in other European nations. To this progress a sudden stop was put by the invasion of the Saracens or Moors from Africa. The Goths could not withstand the efforts of their enthusiastic valour, which subdued the greatest part of Spain with the same impetuous rapidity that distinguishes all the operations of their arms. The ronquerors introduced into the country in which they settled the Mahometan religion, the Arabic language, the manners of the East, together with that taste for the arts and that love of elegance and splendour which the Caliphs had begun to cultivate among their sub- jects. [712.] Such Gothic nobles as disdained to submit to the SECTION in.] STATE OF EUROPE. ] 37 Moorish yoke fled for refuge to the inaccessible moun- tains of Asturias. There they comforted themselves with enjoying the exercise of the Christian religion and with maintaining the authority of their ancient laws. Being joined by many of the boldest and most warlike among their countrymen, they sallied out upon the adjacent settlements of the Moors in small parties; but, venturing only upon short excursions at first, they were satisfied with plunder and revenge, without think- ing of conquest. By degrees their strength increased, their views enlarged, a regular government was estab- lished among them, and they began to aim at extending their territories. While they pushed on their attacks with the unremitting ardour excited by zeal for re- ligion, by the desire of vengeance, and by the hope of rescuing their country from oppression, while they conducted their operations with the courage natural to men who had no other occupation but war, and who were strangers to all the arts which corrupt or enfeeble the mind, the Moors gradually lost many of the advan- tages to which they had been indebted for their first success. They threw off all dependence on the Ca- liphs ; 15 they neglected to preserve a close connection with their countrymen in Africa ; their empire in Spain was split into many small kingdoms ; the arts which they cultivated, together with the luxury to which theso gave rise, relaxed in some measure the force of their military institutions and abated the vigour of their war-like spirit. The Moors, however, continued still to be a gallant people, and possessed great resources. Ac- cording to the magnificent style of the Spanish his- torians, eight centuries of almost uninterrupted war elapsed, and three thousand seven hundred battles were fought, before the last of the Moorish kingdoms in Spain submitted to the Christian arms. [1492.] u Jos. Sim. Assemauiii, Histor. Ital. Scriptores, vol. in. p. 135. 138 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION nt As the Christians made their conquests upon the Mahometans at various periods and under different leaders, each formed the territory which he had wrested from the common enemy into an independent state. Spain was divided into almost as many separate king- doms as it contained provinces; in each city of note a petty monarch established his throne and assumed all the ensigns of royalty. In a series of years, however, by the usual events of intermarriages, or succession, or conquest, all these inferior principalities were annexed to the more powerful kingdoms of Castile and of Aragon. At length, by the fortunate marriage of Ferdinand and Isabella, the former the hereditary monarch of Aragon, and the latter raised to the throne of Castile by the affection of her subjects, all the Spanish crowns were united, and descended in the same line. [1481.] From this period the political constitution of Spain began to assume a regular and uniform appearance ; the genius of its government may be delineated, and the progress of its laws and manners may be traced, with certainty. Notwithstanding the singular revolu- tion which the invasion of the Moors occasioned in Spain, and the peculiarity of its fate in being so long subject to the Mahometan yoke, the customs introduced by the Yandals and Goths had taken such deep root, and were so thoroughly incorporated with the frame of its government, that in every province which the Christians recovered from the Moors we find the con- dition of individuals, as well as the political constitu- tion, nearly the same as in other nations of Europe. Lands were held by the same tenure ; justice was dispensed in the same form ; the same privileges were claimed by the nobility, and the same power exercised by the cortes, or general assembly of the kingdom. Several circumstances contributed to secure this per- SECTION in.] STATE OF EUROPE. 139 manence of the feudal institutions in Spain, notwith- standing the conquests of the Moors, which seemed to have overturned them. Such of the Spaniards as preserved their independence adhered to their ancient customs, not only from attachment to them, but out of antipathy to the Moors, to whose ideas concerning property and government these customs were totally repugnant. Even among the Christians who submitted to the Moorish conquerors and consented to become their subjects, ancient customs were not entirely abol- ished. They were permitted to retain their religion, their laws concerning private property, their forms of administering justice, and their mode of levying taxes. The followers of Mahomet are the only enthusiasts who have united the spirit of toleration with zeal for making proselytes, and who, at the same time that they took arms to propagate the doctrine of their prophet, per- mitted such as would not embrace it to adhere to their own tenets and to practise their own rites. To this peculiarity in the genius of the Mahometan religion, as well as to the desire which the Moors had of reconciling the Christians to their yoke, it was owing that the ancient manners and laws in Spain survived the violent shock of a conquest, and were permitted to subsist not- withstanding the introduction of a new religion and a new form of government into that country. It is obvious from all these particulars that the Christians must have found it extremely easy to re-establish manners and government on their ancient foundations in those pro- vinces of Spain which they wrested successively from the Moors. A considerable part of the people retained such a fondness for the customs and such a reverence for the laws of their ancestors that, wishing to see them completely restored, they were not only willing but eager to resume the former and to recognise the authority of the latter. 140 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION in. But though the feudal form of government, with all the institutions which characterise it, was thus preserved in Castile and Aragon, as well as in all the kingdoms which depended on these crowns, there were certain peculiarities in their political constitutions which dis- tinguish them from those of any other country in Europe. The royal prerogative, extremely limited in every feudal kingdom, was circumscribed in Spain within such narrow bounds as reduced the power of the sovereign almost to nothing. The privileges of the nobility were great in proportion, and extended so far as to border on absolute independence. The immuni- ties of the cities were likewise greater than in other feudal kingdoms ; they possessed considerable influence in the cortes, and they aspired at obtaining more. Such a state of society, in which the political machine was so ill adjusted and the several members of the legislature so improperly balanced, produced internal disorders in the kingdoms of Spain, which rose beyond the pitch of turbulence and anarchy usual under the feudal government. The whole tenor of the Spanish history confirms the truth of this observation ; and when the mutinous spirit to which the genius of their policy gave birth and vigour was no longer restrained and overawed by the immediate dread of the Moorish arms, it broke out into more frequent insurrections against the govern- ment of their princes, as well as more outrageous insults on their dignity, than occur in the annals of any other country. These were accompanied at some times with more liberal sentiments concerning the rights of the people, at other times with more elevated notions con- cerning the privileges of the nobles, than were common in other nations. In the principality of Catalonia, which was annexed to the kingdom of Aragon, the impatience of the people to obtain a redress of their grievances having prompted SECTION in.] STATE OF EUROPE. 141 them to take arms against their sovereign, John II., they, by a solemn deed, recalled the oath of allegiance which they had sworn to him, declared him and his posterity to be unworthy of the throne, 16 and en- deavoured to establish a republican form of govern- ment, in order to secure the perpetual enjoyment of that liberty after which they aspired. 17 Nearly about the same period, the indignation of the Castilian nobility against the weak and flagitious administration of Henry IY. having led them to combine against him, they arrogated, as one of the privileges belonging to their order, the right of trying and of passing sentence on their sovereign. That the exercise of this power might be as public and solemn as the pretension to it was bold, they summoned all the nobility of their party to meet at Avila; a spacious theatre was erected in a plain without the walls of the town ; an image repre- senting the king was seated on a throne, clad in royal robes, with a crown on its head, a sceptre in its hand, and the sword of justice by its side. The accusation against the king was read, and the sentence of deposi- tion was pronounced, in presence of a numerous assembly. At the close of the first article of the charge, the arch- bishop of Toledo advanced and tore the crown from the nead of the image ; at the close of the second, the Conde de Placentia snatched the sword of justice from its side ; at the close of the third, the Conde de JSenevente wrested the sceptre from its hand ; at the close of the last, Don Diego Lopes de Stuniga tumbled it headlong from the throne. At the same instant, Don Alfonzo, Henry's brother, was proclaimed king of Castile and Leon in his stead. 18 16 Zurita, Anales de Arag., torn. Marinseus Siculus, De Reb. Hispan.. iv. pp. 113, 115, etc. apud Schotti Script. Hispan., fol. 17 Ferrera, Hist. d'Espagne, torn. 429. vii. p. 92. P. Orleans, ReVol. 1S Marian., Hist, lib. xxxiii. c. 9. d'Espagne, torn, iii p. 155. L. [1465.] L42 A VIEW OF THE L SECTION m The most daring leaders of faction would not have ventured on these measures, nor have conducted them with such public ceremony, if the sentiments of the people concerning the royal dignity had not been so formed by the laws and policy to which they were accustomed, both in Castile and Catalonia, as prepared them to approve of such extraordinary proceedings, or to acquiesce in them. In Aragon the form of government was monarchical, but the genius and maxims of it were purely republican. The kings, who were long elective, retained only the shadow of power ; the real exercise of it was in the cortes, or parliament of the kingdom. This supreme assembly was composed of four different arms or mem- bers : the nobility of the first rank ; the equestrian order, or nobility of the second class ; the representatives of the cities and towns, whose right to a place in the cortes, if we may give credit to the historians of Aragon, was coeval with the constitution ; the eccle- siastical order, composed of the dignitaries of the church, together with the representatives of the inferior clergy. 19 No law could pass in this assembly without the assent of every single member who had a right to vote. 20 Without the permission of the cortes no tax could be imposed, no war could be declared, no peace could be concluded, no money could be coined, nor could any alteration be made in the current specie. 31 The power of reviewing the proceedings of all inferior courts, the privilege of inspecting every department of administration, and the right of redressing all griev- ances, belonged to the cortes. Nor did those who con- ceived themselves to be aggrieved address the cortes in the humble tone of supplicants and petition for 19 Forma de celebrar Cortes en 21 Hier. Blanca, Comment. Rer. Aragon, por Geron. MarteL Aragon., ap. Schot. Script. Hispau. '"' Martel, ibid., p. 2. vol. iii p. 750. SECTION in.] STATE OF EUROPE. 143 redress : they demanded it as the birthright of freemen, and required the guardians of their liberty to decide with respect to the points which they laid before them. M This sovereign court was held during several centuries every year ; but, in consequence of a regulation intro- duced about the beginning of the fourteenth century, it was convoked from that period only once in two years. After it was assembled, the king had no right to prorogue or dissolve it without its own consent ; and the session continued forty days. 23 Not satisfied with having erected such formidable barriers against the encroachments of the royal pre- rogative, nor willing to commit the sole guardianship of their liberties entirely to the vigilance and authority of an assembly similar to the diets, states-general, and parliaments in which the other feudal nations have placed so much confidence, the Aragonese had recourse to an institution peculiar to themselves, and elected a justiza, or supreme Judge. This magistrate, whose office bore some resemblance to that of the cphori in ancient Sparta, acted as the protector of the people and the controller of the prince. The person of the justiza was sacred, his power and jurisdiction almost unbounded. He was the supreme interpreter of the laws. Hot only inferior judges, but the kings them- selves, were bound to consult him in every doubtful case and to receive his responses with implicit defer- ence. 24 An appeal lay to him from the royal judges, as well as from those appointed by the barons within their respective territories. Even when no appeal was made to him, he could interpose by his own authority, pro- hibit the ordinary judge to proceed, take immediate 22 Martel, Forma de celebrar, p. 2. sponses of the justiza to James II., '" Hier. Blanca, Comment, p. who reigned towards the close of 763. the thirteenth century. Blanca, 74 Blanca has preserved two re- p. 748. 144 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION m. cognizance of the cause himself, and remove the party accused to the manifestation, or prison of the state, to which no person had access but by his permission. His power was exerted with no less vigour and effect in superintending the administration of government than in regulating the course of justice. It was the preroga- tive of the justiza to inspect the conduct of the king. He had a title to review all the royal proclamations and patents, and to declare Avhether or not they were agree- able to law and ought to be carried into execution. He, by his sole authority, could exclude any of the king's ministers from the conduct of affairs and call them to answer for their maladministration. He himself was accountable to the cortes only for the manner in which he discharged the duties of this high office and per- formed functions of the greatest importance that could be committed to a subject. 26 It is evident, from a bare enumeration of the privi- leges of the Aragonese cortes, as well as of the rights 6elonging to the justiza, that a very small portion ol power remained in the hands of the king. The Arago- nese seem to have been solicitous that their monarchs should know and feel this state of impotence to which they were reduced. Even in swearing allegiance to their sovereign, an act which ought naturally to be accompanied with professions of submission and re- spect, they devised an oath in such a form as to remind him of his dependence on his subjects. " We," said the justiza to the king in the name of his high-spirited barons, "who are each of us as good, and who are altogether more powerful than you, promise obedience to your government if you maintain our rights and liberties ; but if not, not." Conformably to this oath they established it as a fundamental article in their constitution that if the king should violate their rights 2i Note XXXI. Hier. BJanca, Comment., pp. 747, 755. 3KCT10N m.] STATE OF EUROPE. 146 and privileges it was lawful for the people to disclaim him as their sovereign, and to elect another, even though a heathen, in his place. 26 The attachment of the Aragonese to this singular constitution of govern- ment was extreme, and their respect for it approached to superstitious veneration. 27 In the preamble to one of their laws they declare that such was the barrenness of their country, and the poverty of the inhabitants, that, if it were not on account of the liberties by which they were distinguished from other nations, the people would abandon it and go in quest of a settlement to some more fruitful region. 28 In Castile there were not such peculiarities in the form of Government as to establish any remarkable distinction between it and that of the other European nations. The executive part of government was com- mitted to the king, but with a prerogative extremely limited. The legislative authority resided in the cortes, which was composed of the nobility, the dignified ecclesiastics, and the representatives of the cities. The assembly of the cortes in Castile was very ancient, and seems to have been almost coeval with the constitution. The members of the three different orders, who had a right of suffrage, met in one place and deliberated as one collective body, the decisions of which were regu- lated by the sentiments of the majority. The right of imposing taxes, of enacting laws, and of redressing grievances belonged to this assembly ; and, in order to secure the assent of the king to such statutes and regulations as were deemed salutary or beneficial to the kingdom, it was usual in the cortes to take no step towards granting money until all business relative to the public welfare was concluded. The representatives 26 Hier. Blanca, Comment., p. 28 Hier. Blanca, Comment, p. 720. 751. -' Note XXXII. VOL. 1. L 146 A VIEW THE [SECTION m. of cities seemed to have obtained a seat very early in the cortes of Castile, and soon acquired such influence and credit as were very uncommon at a period when the splendour and pre-eminence of the nobility had eclipsed or depressed all other orders of men. The number of members from cities bore such a proportion to that of the whole collective body as rendered them extremely respectable in the cortes. 29 The degree of considera- tion which they possessed in the state may be estimated by one event. Upon the death of John I. a council of regency was appointed to govern the kingdom during the minority of his son. It was composed of an equal number of noblemen and of deputies chosen by the cities ; the latter were admitted to the same rank and invested with the same powers as prelates and grandees of the first order. 30 But though the members of com- munities in Castile were elevated above the condition wherein they were placed in other kingdoms of Europe, though they had attained to such political importance that even the proud and jealous spirit of the feudal aristocracy could not exclude them from a considerable share in government, yet the nobles, notwithstanding these acquisitions of the commons, continued to assert the privileges of their order, in opposition to the crown, in a tone extremely high. There was not any body of nobility in Europe more distinguished for independence of spirit, haughtiness of deportment, and bold preten- sions than that of Castile. The history of that mon- archy affords the most striking examples of the vigilance with which they observed, and of the vigour with which they opposed, every measure of their king's that tended to encroach on their jurisdiction, to diminish their dignity, or to abridge their power. Even in their ordinary intercourse with their monarchs they preserved such a consciousness of their rank that the nobles 29 Note XXXIIL 30 Marian., Hist., lib. rviii. c. 16. SECTION in.] STATE OP EUEOPE. 147 of the first order claimed it as a privilege to be covered in the royal presence, and approached their sovereigns rather as equals than as subjects. The constitutions of the subordinate monarchies which depended on the crowns of Castile and Aragon nearly resembled those of the kingdoms to which they were annexed. In all of them, the dignity and inde- pendence of the nobles were great, the immunities and power of the cities were considerable. An attentive observation of the singular situation of Spain, as well as the various events which occurred there from the invasion of the Moors to the union of its kingdom under Ferdinand and Isabella, will dis- cover the causes to which all the peculiarities in its political constitution I have pointed out ought to be ascribed. As the provinces of Spain were wrested from the Mahometans gradually and with difficulty, the nobles who followed the standard of any eminent leader in these wars conquered not for him alone, but for them- selves. They claimed a share in the lands which their valour had won from the enemy, and their prosperity and power increased in proportion as the territory of the prince extended. During their perpetual wars with the Moors, the mon- archs of the several kingdoms in Spain depended so much on their nobles that it became necessary to con- ciliate their good will by successive grants of new honours and privileges. By the time that any prince could establish his dominion in a conquered province, the greater part of the territory was parcelled out by him among his barons, with such jurisdiction and immuni- ties as raised them almost to sovereign power. At the same time, the kingdoms erected in so many different corners of Spain were of inconsiderable extent. The petty monarch was but little elevated above his L 2 148 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION in. nobles. They, feeling themselves to be almost his equals, acted as such, and could not look up to the kings of such limited domains with the same reverence that the sove- reigns of the great monarchies in Europe were viewed by their subjects. 31 While these circumstances concurred in exalting the nobility and in depressing the royal authority, there were other causes which raised the cities in Spain to consideration and power. As the open country, during the wars with the Moors, was perpetually exposed to the excursions of the enemy, with whom no peace or truce was so permanent as to prove any lasting security, self-preservation obliged persons of all ranks to fix their residence in places of strength. The castles of the barons, which in other countries afforded a commodious retreat from the depredations of banditti or from the transient violence of any interior commotion, were unable to resist an enemy whose operations were conducted with regular and persevering vigour. Cities, in which great numbers united for their mutual defence, were the only places in which people could reside with any prospect of safety. To this was owing the rapid growth of those cities in Spain of which the Christians recovered possession. All who fled from the Moorish yoke resorted to them, as to an asylum ; and in them the greater part of those who took the field against the Mahometans established their families. Several of these cities, during a longer or shorter course of years, were the capitals of little states, and enjoyed all the advantages which accelerate the in- crease of inhabitants in every place that is the seat of government. From these concurring causes, the number of cities in Spain at the beginning of the fifteenth century had 31 Note XXXIV. SECTION in.] STATE OF EUROPE. 149 become considerable, and they were peopled far beyond the proportion which was common in other parts of Europe, except in Italy and the Low Countries. The Moors had introduced manufactures into those cities while under their dominion. The Christians, who, by intermixture with them, had learned their arts, con- tinued to cultivate these. Trade, in several of the Spanish towns, appears to have been carried on with vigour ; and the spirit of commerce continued to pre- serve the number of their inhabitants, as the sense of danger had first induced them to crowd together. As the Spanish cities were populous, many of the inhabitants were of a rank superior to those who resided in towns in other countries of Europe. That cause which contributed chiefly to their population affected equally persons of every condition, who flocked thither promiscuously, in order to find shelter there, or in hopes of making a stand against the enemy with greater advantage than in any other station. The persons elected as their representatives in the cortes by the cities, or promoted to offices of trust and dignity in the government of the community, were often, as will appear from transactions which I shall hereafter relate, of such considerable rank in the kingdom as reflected lustre on their constituents and on the stations wherein they were placed. As it was impossible to carry on a continual war against the Moors without some other military force than that which the barons were obliged to bring into the field in consequence of the feudal tenures, it be- came necessary to have some troops, particularly a body of light cavalry, in constant pay. It was one of the privileges of the nobles that their lands were exempt from the burden of taxes. The charge of sup- porting the troops requisite for the public safety fell wholly upon the cities ; and their kings, being 150 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION in. frequently to apply to them for aid, found it necessary to gain their favour by concessions, which not only extended their immunities, but added to their wealth and power. When the influence of all these circumstances, pecu- liar to Spain, is added to the general and common causes which contributed to aggrandize cities in other countries of Europe, this will fully account for the extensive privileges which they acquired, as well as for the extraordinary consideration to which they attained, in all the Spanish kingdoms. 32 By these exorbitant privileges of the nobility, and this unusual power of the cities, in Spain, the royal prerogative was hemmed in on every side and reduced within very narrow bounds. Sensible of this, and im- patient of such restraint, several monarchs endeavoured, at various junctures and by different means, to enlarge their own jurisdiction. Their power, however, or their abilities, were so unequal to the undertaking that their efforts were attended with little success. But when Ferdinand and Isabella found themselves at the head of the united kingdoms of Spain and delivered from the danger and interruption of domestic wars, they were not only in a condition to resume, but were able to prosecute with advantage, the schemes for extending the prerogative which their ancestors had attempted in vain. Ferdinand's profound sagacity in concerting his measures, his persevering industry in conducting them, and his uncommon address in carrying them into exe- cution, fitted him admirably for an undertaking which required all these talents. As the overgrown power and high pretensions of the nobility were what the monarchs of Spain felt most sensibly and bore with the greatest impatience, the great object of Ferdinand's policy was to reduce 33 Note XXXV. SECTION in.] STATE OF EUROPE. 151 these within more moderate bounds. Under various pretexts, sometimes by violence, more frequently in consequence of decrees obtained in the courts of law, he wrested from the barons a great part of the lands which had been granted to them by the inconsiderate bounty of former monarchs, particularly during the feeble and profuse reign of his predecessor, Henry IY. He did not give the entire conduct of affairs to persons of noble birth, who were accustomed to occupy every department of importance in peace or in war, as if it had been a privilege peculiar to their order to be em- ployed as the sole counsellors and ministers of thr crown. He often transacted business of great conse- quence without their intervention, and bestowed many offices of power and trust on new men, devoted to his interest. 33 He introduced a degree of state and dig- nity into his court which, being little known in Spain while it remained split into many small kingdoms, taught the nobles to approach their sovereign with more ceremony, and gradually rendered him the object of greater deference and respect. The annexing the masterships of the three military orders of St. Jago, Calatrava, and Alcantara to the crown was another expedient by which Ferdinand greatly augmented the revenue and power of the kings of Spain. These orders were instituted, in imitation of those of the Knights Templars and of St. John of Jerusalem, on purpose to wage perpetual war with the Mahometans, and to protect the pilgrims who visited Compostella, or other places of eminent sanctity in Spain, The zeal and superstition of the ages in which they were founded prompted persons of every rank to bestow such liberal donations on those holy warriors that in a short time they engrossed a considerable share in the property and wealth of the kingdom. The master- 33 Zurita, Anales de Arag., torn. vi. p. 22. 152 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION in. ships of these orders came to be stations of the greatest power and opulence to which a Spanish nobleman could be advanced. These high dignities were in the dis- posal of the knights of the order, and placed the per- sons on whom they conferred them almost on a level with their sovereign. 34 Ferdinand, unwilling that the nobility, whom he considered as already too formidable, should derive such additional credit and influence from possessing the government of these wealthy fraternities, was solicitous to wrest it out of their hands and to vest it in the crown. His measures for accomplishing this were wisely planned and executed with vigour. 35 By address, by promises, and by threats, he prevailed on the knights of each order to place Isabella and him at the head of it. Innocent VIII. and Alexander VI. gave this election the sanction of papal authority; 36 and subsequent pontiffs rendered the annexation of these masterships to the crown perpetual. While Ferdinand by this measure diminished the power and influence of the nobility and added new lustre or authority to the crown, he was taking other important steps with a view to the same object. The sovereign jurisdiction which the feudal barons exercised within their own territories was the pride and dis- tinction of their order. To have invaded openly a privilege which they prized so highly, and in defence of which they would have run so eagerly to arms, was a measure too daring for a prince of Ferdinand's cautious temper. He took advantage, however, of an opportunity which the state of his kingdoms and the spirit of his people presented him, in order to under- mine what he durst not assault. The incessant depre- 34 Note XXXVI. a Ferdinand, et Elizab. gestarum '' Marian., Hist., lib. xxv. c. 0. decades ii., apud Schot Script 36 Zurita, Anales, torn. v. p. 22. Hispan., i. 860. uElii Anton. Nebrissfjisis Renun SECTION in.] STATE OF EUROPE. 15-". dations of the Moors, the want of discipline among the troops which were employed to oppose them, the frequent civil wars between the crown and the nobility, as well as the undiscerning rage with which the barons carried on their private wars with each other, filled all the provinces of Spain with disorder. Rapine, outrage, and murder became so common as not only to in- terrupt commerce, but in a great measure to suspend all intercourse between -one place and another. That security and protection which men expect from enter- ing into civil society ceased in a great degree. Internal order and police, while the feudal institutions remained in vigour, were so little objects of attention, and the administration of justice was so extremely feeble, that it would have been vain to have expected relief from the established laws or the ordinary judges. But the evil became so intolerable, and the inhabitants of cities, who were the chief sufferers, grew so impatient of this anarchy, that self-preservation forced them to have recourse to an extraordinary remedy. About the middle of the thirteenth century, the cities in the kingdom of Aragon, and, after their example, those in Castile, formed themselves into an association distinguished by the name of the holy brotherhood. They exacted a certain contribution from each of the associated towns ; they levied a considerable body of troops, in order to protect travellers, and to pursue criminals ; they appointed judges, who opened their courts in various parts of the kingdom. Whoever was guilty of murder, robbery, or of any act that violated the public peace, and was seized by the troops of the brotherhood, was carried before judges of their nomination, who, without paying any regard to the exclusive and sovereign juris- diction which the lord of the place might claim, tried and condemned the criminals. By the establishment of this fraternity the prompt and impartial adminis- 154 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION in. tration of justice was restored, and, together with it, internal tranquillity and order began to return. The nobles alone murmured at this salutary institution. They complained of it as an encroachment on one of their most valuable privileges. They remonstrated against it in a high tone, and, on some occasions, refused to grant any aid to the crown unless it were abolished. Ferdinand, however, was sensible not only of the good effects of the holy brotherhood with respect to the police of his kingdoms, but perceived its tendency to abridge, and at length to annihilate, the territorial jurisdiction of the nobility. He countenanced it on every occasion. He supported it with the whole force of royal authority ; and, besides the expedients employed by him in common with the other monarchs of Europe, he availed himself of this institution, which was peculiar to his kingdom, in order to limit and abolish that independent jurisdiction of the nobility, which was no less inconsistent with the authority of the prince than with the order of society. 37 But though Ferdinand by these measures considerably enlarged the boundaries of his prerogative, and acquired a degree of influence and power far beyond what any of his predecessors had enjoyed, yet the limitations of the royal authority, as well as the barriers against its encroachments, continued to be many and strong. The spirit of liberty was vigorous among the people of Spain ; the spirit of independence was high among the nobility ; and though the love of glory, peculiar to the Spaniards in every period of their history, prompted them to support Ferdinand with zeal in his foreign operations, and to afford him such aid as enabled him not only to undertake but to execute great enterprises, he reigned over his subjects with a jurisdiction less extensive than that of any of the great monarchs in 37 Note XXXVII. SECTION in.] STATE OF EUROPE. 155 Europe. It will appear from many passages in the following history that during a considerable part of the reign of his successor Charles V. the prerogative of the Spanish crown was equally circumscribed. The ancient government and laws in France so nearly resembled those of the other feudal kingdoms that such a detail with respect to them as was necessary, in order to convey some idea of the nature and effects of the peculiar institutions which took place in Spain, would be superfluous. In the view which I have exhibited of the means by which the French monarchs acquired such a full command of the national force of their kingdom as enabled them to engage in extensive schemes of foreign operation, I have already pointed out the great steps by which they advanced towards a more ample possession of political power and a more uncontrolled exercise of their royal prerogative. All that now remains is to take notice of such particulars in the constitution of France as serve either to distinguish it from that of other countries, or tend to throw any light on the transactions of that period to which the following History extends. Under the French monarchs of the first race, the royal prerogative was very inconsiderable. The general assemblies of the nation, which met annually at stated seasons, extended their authority to every department of government. The power of electing kings, of enact- ing laws, of redressing grievances, of conferring dona- tions on the prince, of passing judgment in the last resort, with respect to every person and to every cause, resided in this great convention of the nation. Under the second race of kings, notwithstanding the power and splendour which the conquests of Charlemagne added to the crown, the general assemblies of the nation continued to possess extensive authority. The right of determining which of the royal family should be placed L56 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION m. on the throno was vested in them. The princes, ele- vated to that dignity by their suffrage, were accustomed regularly to call and to consult them with respect to every affair of importance to the state, and without their consent no law was passed and no new tax was levied. But by the time that Hugh Capet, the father of the third race of kings, took possession of the throne of France, such changes had happened in the political state of the kingdom as considerably affected the power and jurisdic- tion of the general assembly of the nation. The royal authority, in the hands of the degenerate posterity of Charlemagne, had dwindled into insignificance and con- tempt. Every considerable proprietor of land had formed his territory into a barony almost independent of the sovereign. The dukes or governors of provinces, the counts or governors of towns and small districts, and the great officers of the crown, had rendered these dig- nities, which originally were granted only during plea- sure or for life, hereditary in their families. Each of these had usurped all the rights which hitherto had been deemed the distinctions of royalty, particularly the pri- vileges of dispensing justice within their own domains, of coining money, and of waging war. Every district was governed by local customs, acknowledged a distinct lord, and pursued a separate interest. The formality of doing homage to their sovereign was almost the only act of subjection which those haughty barons would per- form ; and that bound them no farther than they were willing to acknowledge its obligation. 38 In a kingdom broken into so many independent baro- nies, hardly any common principle of union remained ; and the general assembly, in its deliberations, could scarcely consider the nation as forming one body, or establish common regulations to be of equal force in 38 Note XXXVIII. BECTJON in.] STATE OF EUROPE. 157 every part. Within the immediate domains of the crown the king might publish laws, and they were obeyed, be- cause there he was acknowledged as the only lord. But if he had aimed at rendering these laws general, that would have alarmed the barons as an encroachment upon the independence of their jurisdiction. The barons, when met in the great national convention, avoided with no less care the enacting of general laws to be observed in every part of the kingdom, because the execution of them must have been vested in the king, and would have enlarged that paramount power which was the object of their jealousy. Thus, under the descendants of Hugh Capet the states-general (for that was the name by which the supreme assembly of the French nation came then to be distinguished) lost their legislative authority, or at least entirely relinquished the exercise of it. From that period the jurisdiction of the states-general extended no farther than to the imposition of new taxes, the determina- tion of questions with respect to the right of succession to the crown, the settling of the regency when the pre- ceding monarch had not fixed it by his will, and the presenting remonstrances enumerating the grievances of which the nation wished to obtain redress. As during several centuries the monarchs of Europe seldom demanded extraordinary subsidies of their sub- jects, and the other events which required the interposi- tion of the states rarely occurred, their meetings in France were not frequent. They were summoned occa- sionally by their kings, when compelled by their wants or by their fears to have recourse to the great convention of their people ; but they did not, like the diet in Ger- many, the cortes in Spain, or the parliament in England, form an essential member of the constitution, the regular exertion of whose powers was requisite to give vigour and order to government. When the states of France ceased to exercise legisla- 158 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION m. tive authority, the kings began to assume it. Thej ventured at first on acts of legislation with great reserve, and after taking every precaution that could prevent their subjects from being alarmed at the exercise of a new power. They did not at once issue their ordinances in a tone of authority and command. They treated with their subjects; they pointed out what was best, and allured them to comply with it. By degrees, however, as the prerogative of the crown extended, and as the supreme jurisdiction of the royal courts came to be established, the kings of France assumed more openly the style and authority of lawgivers ; and before the be- ginning of the fifteenth century the complete legislative power was vested in the crown. 39 Having secured this important acquisition, the steps which led to the right of imposing taxes were rendered few and easy. The people, accustomed to see their sove- reigns issue ordinances, by their sole authority, which regulated points of the greatest consequence with respect to the property of their subjects, were not alarmed when they were required by the royal edicts to contribute certain sums towards supplying the exigencies of govern- ment and carrying forward the measures of the nation. When Charles VII. and Louis XI. first ventured to exer- cise this new power, in the manner in which I have already described, the gradual increase of the royal authority had so imperceptibly prepared the minds of the people of France for this innovation that it excited no commotion in the kingdom, and seemed scarcely to have given rise to any murmur or complaint. When the kings of France had thus engrossed every power which can be exerted in government, when the right of making laws, of levying money, of keeping an army of mercenaries in constant pay, of declaring war, and of concluding peace, centred in the crown, the 39 Note XXXIX. SECTION in.] STATE OF EUROPE. 159 constitution of the kingdom, which under the first race of kings was nearly democratical, which under the second race became an aristocracy, terminated under the third race in a pure monarchy. Every thing that tended to preserve the appearance or revive the memory of the ancient mixed government seems from that period to have been industriously avoided. During the long and active reign of Francis L, the variety as well as extent of whose operations obliged him to lay many heavy im- positions on his subjects, the states-general of France were not once assembled, nor were the people once allowed to exert the power of taxing themselves, which, according to the original ideas of feudal government, was a right essential to every freeman. . Two things, however, remained which moderated the exercise of the regal prerogative and restrained it within such bounds as preserved the constitution of France from degenerating into mere despotism. The rights and pri- vileges claimed by the nobility must be considered as one barrier against the absolute dominion of the crown. Though the nobles of France had lost that political power which was vested in their order as a body, they still retained the personal rights and pre-eminence which they derived from their rank. They preserved a con- sciousness of elevation above other classes of citizens ; ai exemption from burdens to which persons of inferior condition were subject; a contempt of the occupations in which they were engaged; the privilege of assuming ensigns that indicated their own dignity ; a right to be treated with a certain degree of deference during peace : and a claim to various distinctions when in the field. Many of these pretensions were not founded on the words of statutes, or derived from positive laws : they were defined and ascertained by the maxims of honour, a title more delicate, but no less sacred. These rights, established and protected by a principle equally vigilant 1 60 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION in. in guarding and intrepid in defending them, are to the sovereign himself objects of respect and veneration. Wherever they stand in its way, the royal prerogative is bounded. The violence of a despot may exterminate such an order of men ; but as long as it subsists, and its ideas of personal distinction remain entire, the power of the prince has limits. 40 As in France the body of nobility was very numerous, md the individuals of which it was composed retained a high sense of their own pre-eminence, to this we may ascribe in a great measure the mode of exercising the royal prerogative which peculiarly distinguishes the government of that kingdom. An intermediate order was placed between the monarch and his other subjects, and in every act of authority it became necessary to attend to its privileges, and not only to guard against any real violation of them, but to avoid any suspicion of suppos- ing it to be possible that they might be violated. Thus a species of government was established in France un- known in the ancient world, that of a monarchy in which the power of the sovereign, though unconlined by any legal or constitutional restraint, has certain bounds set to it by the ideas which one class of his subjects entertain concerning their own dignity. The jurisdiction of the parliaments in France, particu- larly that of Paris, was the other barrier which served to confine the exercise of the royal prerogative within certain limits. The parliament of Paris was originally the court of the kings of France, to which they com- mitted 1he supreme administration of justice within their own domains, as well as the power of deciding with respect to all cases brought before it by appeals from the courts of the barons. When, in consequence of events and regulations which have been mentioned formerly, the 40 De 1'Esprit des Loix, liv. iL History of Civil Society, part L c. 4. Dr. Ferguson's Essay on the sect. 10. SECTION in.] STATE OF EUROPE. time and place of its meeting were fixed, when not only the form of its procedure, but the principles on which it decided, were rendered regular and consistent, when every cause of importance was finally determined there, and when the people became accustomed to resort thither as to the supreme temple of justice, the parlia- ment of Paris rose to high estimation in the kingdom, its members acquired dignity, and its decrees were sub- mitted to with deference. NOT was this the only source of the power and influence which the parliament obtained. The kings of France, when they first began to assume the legislative power, in order to reconcile the minds of their people to this new exertion of prerogative, pro- duced their edicts and ordinances in the parliament of Paris, that they might be approved of and registered there before they were published and declared to be of authority in the kingdom. During the intervals between the meetings of the states-general of the kingdom, or during those reigns in which the states-general were not assembled, the monarchs of France were accustomed to consult the parliament of Paris with respect to the most arduous affairs of government, and frequently regulated their conduct by its advice, in declaring war, in conclud- ing peace, and in other transactions of public concern. Thus there was erected in the kingdom a tribunal which became the great depository of the laws, and, by the uniform tenor of its decrees, established principles of justice and forms of proceeding which were considered as so sacred that even the sovereign power of the monarch durst not venture to disregard or to violate them. The members of this illustrious body, though they neither possess legislative authority nor can be considered as the representatives of the people, have availed themselves of the reputation and influence which they had acquired among their countrymen, in order to make a stand, to the utmost of their ability, against vol.. 1 K 162 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION in, every unprecedented and exorbitant exertion of the prerogative. In every period of the French history they have merited the praise of being the virtuous but feeble guardians of the rights and privileges of the nation. 41 After taking this view of the political state of France, I proceed to consider that of the German empire, from which Charles V. derived his title of highest dignity. In explaining the constitution of this great and complex body at the beginning of the sixteenth century, I shall avoid entering into such a detail as would involve my readers in that inextricable labyrinth which is formed by the multiplicity of its tribunals, the number of its members, their interfering rights, and by the endless discussions or refinements of the public lawyers of Ger- many with respect to all these. The empire of Charlemagne was a structure erected in so short a time that it could not be permanent. Under his immediate successor it began to totter, and soon after fell to pieces. The crown of Germany was separated from that of France, and the descendants of Charlemagne established two great monarchies so situated as to give rise to a perpetual rivalship and enmity be- tween them. But the princes of the race of Charlemagne who were placed on the imperial throne were not alto- gether so degenerate as those of the same family who reigned in France. In the hands of the former the royal authority retained some vigour, and the nobles of Ger- many, though possessed of extensive privileges as well as ample territories, did not so early attain independence. The great offices of the crown continued to be at the disposal of the sovereign, and during a long period fiefs remained in their original state, without becoming here- ditary and perpetual in the families of the persons to whom they had been granted. 41 Note XL. ii i. j STATE OF EUROPE. 163 At length the German branch of the family of Charle- magne became extinct, and his feeble descendants who reigned in France had sunk into such contempt that the Germans, without looking towards them, exercised the right inherent in a free people, and in the general assem- bly of the nation elected Conrad, count of Franconia, emperor. After him Henry of Saxony, and his de- scendants, the three Othos, were placed, in succession, on the imperial throne, by the suffrages of their coun- trymen. The extensive territories of the Saxon em- perors, their eminent abilities and enterprising genius, not only added new vigour to the imperial dignity, but raised it to higher power and pre-eminence. Otho the Great marched at the head of a numerous army into Italy, and, after the example of Charlemagne, gave law to that country. Every power there recognised his authority. He created popes, and deposed them, by his sovereign mandate. He annexed the kingdom of Italy to the German empire. Elated with his success, he assumed the title of CaBsar Augustus. 42 A prince born in the heart of Germany pretended to be the successor of the emperors of ancient Eome, and claimed a right to the same power and prerogative. [952.] But while the emperors, by means of these new titles and new dominions, gradually acquired additional authority and splendour, the nobility of Germany had gone on at the same time extending their privileges and jurisdiction. The situation of affairs was favourable to their attempts. The vigour which Charlemagne had given to government quickly relaxed. The incapacity of some of his successors was such as would have encou- raged vassals less enterprising than the nobles of that age to have claimed new rights and to have assumed new powers'. The civil wars in which other emperors were engaged obliged them to pay perpetual court to 42 Annalista Saxo, etc., ap. Struv., Corp., vol. i p. 246. vl 164 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION ill. their subjects, on whose support they depended, and not only to connive at their usurpations, but to permit and even to authorise them. Fiefs gradually became here- ditary. They were transmitted not only in the direct but also in the collateral line. The investiture of them was demanded not only by male but by female heirs. Every baron began to exercise sovereign jurisdiction within his own domains ; and the dukes and counts of Germany took wide steps towards rendering their terri- tories distinct and independent states. 43 The Saxon emperors observed their progress and were aware of its tendency. But, as they could not hope to humble vassals already grown too potent, unless they had turned their whole force as well as attention to that enterprise, and as they were extremely intent on their expeditions into Italy, which they could not undertake without the concurrence of their nobles, they were solicitous not to alarm them by any direct attack on their privileges and jurisdictions. They aimed, however, at under- mining their power. With this view, they inconsi- derately bestowed additional territories and accumulated new honours on the clergy, in hopes that this order might serve as a counterpoise to that of the nobility in any future struggle. 44 The unhappy effects of this fatal error in policy were quickly felt. Under the emperors of the Franconian and Swabian lines, whom the Germans, by their volun- tary election, placed on the imperial throne, a new face of things appeared, and a scene was exhibited in Ger- many which astonished all Christendom at that time, and in the present age appears almost incredible. The popes, hitherto dependent on the emperors and indebted for power as well as dignity to their beneficence and protection, began to claim a superior jurisdiction, and, a Pfeffel, Abrejrf, pp. 120, 152. 44 Pfeffel, Abreg<$, p. 154. Lib. Feudor., tit. i. SECTION in.] STATE OF EUEOPE. 165 in virtue of authority which they pretended to derive from heaven, tried, condemned, excommunicated, and deposed their former masters. Nor is this to be consi- dered merely as a frantic sally of passion in a pontiff intoxicated with high ideas concerning the extent of priestly domination and the plenitude of papal authority. Gregory VII. was able as well as daring. His presump- tion and violence were accompanied with political dis- cernment and sagacity. He had observed that the princes and nobles of Germany had acquired such con- siderable territories and such extensive jurisdiction as rendered them not only formidable to the emperors, but disposed them to favour any attempt to circumscribe their power. He foresaw that the ecclesiastics of Ger- many, raised almost to a level with its princes, were ready to support any person who would stand forth as the protector of their privileges and independence. With both of these Gregory negotiated, and had secured many devoted adherents among them before he ventured to enter the lists against the head of the empire. He began his rupture with Henry IV. upon a pretext that was popular and plausible. He complained of the venality and corruption with which the emperor had granted the investiture of benefices to ecclesiastics. He contended that this right belonged to him as the head of the Church ; he required Henry to confine him- self within the bounds of his civil jurisdiction, and to abstain for the future from such sacrilegious encroach- ments on the spiritual dominion. All the censures of the Church were denounced against Henry because he refused to relinquish those powers which his predeces- sors had uniformly exercised. The most considerable of the German princes and ecclesiastics were excited to take arms against him. His mother, his wife, his sons, were wrought upon to disregard al 1 . the ties of blood as well as of duty, and to join the party of his 166 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION m. enemies. 45 Such were the successful arts with which the court of Home inflamed the superstitious zeal and con- ducted the factious spirit of the Germans and Italians, that an emperor distinguished not only for many virtues, but possessed of considerable talents, was at length obliged to appear as a supplicant at the gate of the castle in which the pope resided, and to stand there three days, barefooted, in the depth of winter, imploring a pardon, which at length he obtained with difficulty. 46 [1077.] This act of humiliation degraded the imperial dig- nity. Nor was the depression momentary only. The contest between Gregory and Henry gave rise to the two great factions of the Guelfs and Ghibellines, the former of which, supporting the pretensions of the popes, and the latter, defending the rights of the em- peror, kept Germany and Italy in perpetual agitation during three centuries. A regular system for humbling the emperors and circumscribing their power was formed, and adhered to uniformly throughout that period. The popes, the free states in Italy, the nobi- lity and ecclesiastics of Germany, were all interested in its success; and, notwithstanding the return of some short intervals of vigour under the administration of a few able emperors, the imperial authority continued to decline. During the anarchy of the long interreg- num subsequent to the death of William of Holland, it dwindled down almost to nothing. Eodulph of Haps- burg, the founder of the house of Austria, and who first opened the way to its future grandeur, was at length elected emperor, not that he might re-establish and extend the imperial authority, but because his territories and influence were so inconsiderable as to excite no jealousy in the German princes, who were -willing to preserve the forms of a constitution the power and vigour of which they had destroyed. Several of his " Anna! German., ap. Struv., vol. i. p. 325. 48 Note XLI, SECTION in.] STATE OP EUEOPE. 167 successors were placed on the imperial throne from the same motive, and almost every remaining prerogative was wrested out of the hands of feeble princes unable to exercise or to defend them. During this period of turbulence and confusion the constitution of the Germanic body underwent a total change. The ancient names of courts and magistrates, together with the original forms and appearance of policy, were preserved; but such new privileges and jurisdiction were assumed, and so many various rights established, that the same species of government no longer subsisted. The princes, the great nobility, the dignified ecclesiastics, the free cities, had taken advan- tage of the interregnum which I have mentioned to establish or to extend their usurpations. They claimed and exercised the right of governing their respective territories with full sovereignty. They acknowledged no superior with respect to any point relative to the interior administration and police of their domains. They enacted laws, imposed taxes, coined money, de- clared war, concluded peace, and exerted every preroga- tive peculiar to independent states. The ideas of order and political union which had originally formed the various provinces of Germany into one body were almost entirely lost; and the society must have dissolved, if the forms of feudal subordination had not preserved such an appearance of connection or dependence among the various members of the community as preserved it from falling to pieces. This bond of union, however, was extremely feeble ; and hardly any principle remained in the German con- stitution of sufficient force to maintain public order or even to ascertain personal security. From the accession of Eodulph of Hapsburg to the reign of Maximilian, the immediate predecessor of Charles V., the empire felt every calamity which a state must endure when the A VIEW OF THE [SECTION in. authority of government is so much relaxed as to have lost its proper degree of vigour. The causes of dissen- sion among that vast number of members which composed the Germanic body were infinite and unavoidable. These gave rise to perpetual private wars, which were carried on with all the violence that usually accompanies resentment when unrestrained by superior authority. Rapine, outrage, exactions, became universal. Com- merce was interrupted, industry suspended, and every part of Germany resembled a country which an enemy had plundered and left desolate. 47 The variety of ex- pedients employed with a view to restore order and tranquillity prove that the grievances occasioned by this state of anarchy had grown intolerable. Arbiters were appointed to terminate the differences among the several states. The cities united in a league the object of which was to check the rapine and extortions of the nobility. The nobility formed confederacies on purpose to maintain tranquillity among their own order. Germany was divided into several circles, in each of which a provincial and partial jurisdiction was estab- lished, to supply the place of a public and common tribunal. 48 But all these remedies were so ineffectual that they served only to demonstrate the violence of that anarchy which prevailed, and the insufficiency of the means employed to correct it. At length Maximilian re-estab- lished public order in the empire, by instituting the Imperial Chamber, a tribunal composed of judges named partly by the emperor, partly by the several states, and! vested with authority to decide finally concerning all differences among the members of the Germanic body. A few years after, by giving a new form to the Aulie 47 See above, pp. 42-44 and Note 26, p. 35, no. 11. XXI. Datt., de Pace Publica 4S Datt, passim. Stray., Corp Imper., p. 25, no. 53, p. 28, no. Hist., i. 510, etc. SECTION in.] STATE OF EUROPE. 169 Council which takes cognizance of all feudal causes and such as belong to the emperor's immediate jurisdiction, he restored some degree of vigour to the imperial au- thority. [1512.] But, notwithstanding the salutary effects of these regulations and improvements, the political constitution of the German empire, at the commencement of the period of which I propose to write the history, was of a species so peculiar as not to resemble perfectly any form of government known either in the ancient or modern world. It was a complex body, formed by the association of several states, each of which possessed sovereign and independent jurisdiction within its own territories. Of all the members which composed this united body the emperor was the head. In his name all decrees and regulations with respect to points of common concern were issued, and to him the power of carrying them into execution was committed. But this appearance of monarchical power in the emperor was more than counterbalanced by the influence of the princes and states of the empire in every act of admi- nistration. No law extending to the whole body could pass, no resolution that affected the general interest could be taken, without the approbation of the diet of the empire. In this assembly every sovereign prince and state of the Germanic body had a right to be pre- sent, to deliberate, and to vote. The decrees, or recesses, of the diet were the laws of the empire, which the emperor was bound to ratify and enforce. Under this aspect, the constitution of the empire appears a regular confederacy, similar to the Achaean league in ancient Greece, or to that of the United Provinces, and of the Swiss Cantons, in modern times. But, if viewed in another light, striking peculiarities in its political state present themselves. The Germanic body was not formed by the union of members altogether 170 A. VIEW OF THE [SECTIOH in. distinct and independent. All the princes and states joined in this association were originally subject to the emperors and acknowledged them as sovereigns. Besides this, they originally held their lands as impe- rial fiefs, and in consequence of this tenure owed the emperor all those services which feudal vassals are bound to perform to their liege lord. But though this political subjection was entirely at an end, and the in- fluence of the feudal relation much diminished, the ancient forms and institutions, introduced while the c-mperors governed Germany with authority not inferior to that which the other monarchs of Europe possessed, still remained. Thus an opposition was established between the genius of the government and the forms of administration in the German empire. The former con- sidered the emperor only as the head of a confederacy, the members of which, by their voluntary choice, have raised him to that dignity ; the latter seemed to imply that he is really invested with sovereign power. By this circumstance such principles of hostility and dis- cord were interwoven into the frame of the Germanic body as affected each of its members, rendering their interior union incomplete and their external efforts feeble and irregular. The pernicious influence of this defect, inherent in the constitution of the empire, is so considerable that without attending to it we cannot fully comprehend many transactions in the reign of Charles V. or form just ideas concerning the genius of the German government. The emperors of Germany at the beginning of the sixteenth century were distinguished by the most pompous titles, and by such ensigns of dignity as intimated their authority to be superior to that of all other monarchs. The greatest princes of the empire attended and served them, on some occasions, as the officers of their household. They exercised prerogatives SECTION in.] STATE OF EUROPE. 171 which no other sovereign ever claimed. They retained pretensions to all the extensive powers which their predecessors had enjoyed in any former age. But, at the same time, instead of possessing that ample domain which had belonged to the ancient emperors of Ger- many and which stretched from Basil to Cologne, along both banks of the Rhine, 49 they were stripped of all territorial property, and had not a single city, a single castle, a single foot of land, that belonged to them as heads of the empire. As their domain was alienated, their stated revenues were reduced almost to nothing ; and the extraordinary aids which on a few occasions they obtained were granted sparingly and paid with reluctance. The princes and states of the empire, though they seemed to recognise the imperial authority, were subjects only in name, each of them possessing a complete municipal jurisdiction within the precincts of his own territories. From this ill- compacted frame of government effects that were unavoidable resulted. The emperors, dazzled with the splendour of their titles and the external signs of vast authority, were apt to imagine themselves to be the real sovereigns of Germany, and were led to aim continually at recovering the exercise of those powers which the forms of the constitution seemed to vest in them, and which their predecessors, Charlemagne and the Othos, had actually enjoyed. The princes and states, aware of the nature as well as the extent of these pretensions, were perpetually on their guard in order to watch all the motions of the imperial court and to circumscribe its power within limits still more narrow. The emperors, in support of their claims, appealed to ancient forms and institutions which the states held to be obsolete. The states founded their 49 Pfeffel, Abrdg^, etc., p. 241. A VIEW OF THE [SECTION in. rights on recent practice and modern privileges, which the emperors considered as usurpations. This jealousy of the imperial authority, together with the opposition between it and the rights of the states, increased considerably from the time that the emperors were elected, not by the collective body of German nobles, but by a few princes of chief dignity. During a long period all the members of the Germanic body had a right to assemble and to make choice of the person whom they appointed to be their head. But amidst the violence and anarchy which prevailed for several centuries in the empire, seven princes who possessed the most extensive territories, and who had obtained an hereditary title to the great offices of the state, acquired the exclusive privilege of nominating the emperor. This right was confirmed to them by the Golden Bull ; the mode of exercising it was ascer- tained, and they were dignified with the appellation of electors. The nobility and free cities, being thus stripped of a privilege which they had once enjoyed, were less connected with a prince towards whose eleva- tion they had not contributed by their suffrages, and came to be more apprehensive of his authority. The electors, by their extensive power and the distinguish- ing privileges which they possessed, became formidable to the emperors with whom they were placed almost on a level in several acts of jurisdiction. Thus the intro- duction of the electoral college into the empire, and the authority which it acquired, instead of diminishing, contributed to strengthen, the principles of hostility and discord in the Germanic constitution. These were farther augmented by the various and repugnant forms of civil policy in the several states which composed the Germanic body. It is no easy matter to render the union of independent states perfect and entire, even when the genius and forms of BBCTW-K m.] STATE OF EUEOPE. 173 their respective governments happen to be altogether similar. But in the German empire, which was a confederacy of princes, of ecclesiastics, and of free cities, it was impossible that they conld incorporate thoroughly. The free cities were small republics, in which the maxims and spirit peculiar to that species of government prevailed. The princes and nobles, to whom supreme jurisdiction belonged, possessed a sort of monarchical power within their own territories, and the forms of their interior administration nearly resem- bled those of the great feudal kingdoms. The interests, the ideas, the objects of states so differently constituted cannot be the same. Nor could their common delibera- tions be carried on with the same spirit, while the love of liberty and attention to commerce were the reigning principles in the cities, while the desire of power and ardour for military glory were the governing passions of the princes and nobility. The secular and ecclesiastical members of the empire were as little fitted for union as the free cities and the nobility. Considerable territories had been granted to several of the German bishoprics and abbeys, and some of the highest offices in the empire, having been annexed to them inalienably, were held by the ecclesiastics raised to these dignities. The younger sons of noblemen of the second order, who had devoted themselves to the Church, were commonly promoted to these stations of eminence and power ; and it was no small mortification to the princes and great nobility to see persons raised from an inferior rank to the same level with them- selves, or even exalted to superior dignity. The educa- tion of these churchmen, the genius of their profession, and their connection with the court of Eome, ren- dered their character as well as their interest different from those of the other members of the Germanic body with whom they were called to act in concert. 174 A VIEW OF THE [SKCTION m. Thus another source of jealousy and variance was opened which ought not to be overlook ed when we are searching into the nature of the German constitution. To all these causes of dissension may be added one more, arising from the "unequal distribution of power and wealth among the states of the empire. The electors, and other nobles of the highest rank, not only possessed sovereign jurisdiction, but governed such extensive, populous, and rich countries as rendered them great princes. Many of the other members, though they enjoyed all the rights of sovereignty, ruled over such petty domains that their real power bore no proportion to this high prerogative. A well- compacted and vigorous confederacy could not be formed of such dissimilar states. The weaker were jealous, timid, and unable either to assert or to defend their just privileges. The more powerful were apt to assume and to become oppressive. The electors and emperors, by turns, endeavoured to extend their own authority by encroaching on those feeble members of the Germanic body, who sometimes defended their rights with much spirit, but more frequently, being overawed or corrupted, they tamely surrendered their privileges, or meanly favoured the designs formed against them. 50 After contemplating all these principles of disunion and opposition in the constitution of the German em- pire, it will be easy to account for the want of concord and uniformity conspicuous in its councils and proceed- ings. That slow, dilatory, distrustful, and irresolute spirit which characterises all its deliberations will ap- pear natural in a body the junction of whose members was so incomplete, the different parts of which were] held together by such feeble ties and set at variance by such powerful motives. But the empire of Germany, 40 Note XLIL SECTION in.] STATE OF EUKOPE 175 nevertheless, comprehended countries of such great extent, and was inhabited by such a martial and hardy race of men, that when the abilities of an em- peror, or zeal for any common cause, could rouse this unwieldy body to put forth its strength, it acted with almost irresistible force. In the following history we .-.hall find that as the measures on which Charles Y. was most intent were often thwarted or rendered abortive by the spirit of jealousy and division peculiar to the Germanic constitution, so it was by the influence which he acquired over the princes of the empire, and by engaging them to co-operate with him, that he was enabled to make some of the greatest efforts which distinguish his reign. The Turkish history is so blended, during the reign of Charles Y., with that of the great nations in Europe, and the Ottoman Porte interposed so often, and with such decisive influence, in the wars and negotiations of the Christian princes, that some previous account of the state of government in that great empire is no less neces- sary for the information of my readers than those views of the constitution of other kingdoms which I have already exhibited to them. It has been the fate of the southern and more fertile parts of Asia, at different periods, to be conquered by that warlike and hardy race of men who inhabit the vast country known to the ancients by the name of Scythia and among the moderns by that of Tartary. One tribe of these people, called Turks or Turcomans, extended its conquests, under various leaders, and during several centuries, from the shore of the Caspian Sea to the Straits of the Dardanelles. Towards the middle of the fifteenth century these formidable con- querors took Constantinople by storm and established the seat of their government in that imperial city. Greece, Moldavia, Wallachia, and the other provinces 176 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION ra. of the ancient kingdoms of Thrace and Macedonia, together with part of Hungary, were subjected to their power. But though the seat of the Turkish government was fixed in Europe, and the sultans obtained possession of such extensive dominions in that quarter of the globe, the genius of their policy continued to be purely Asiatic, and may be properly termed a despotism, in contradis- tinction to those monarchical and republican forms of government which we have been hitherto contemplating. The supreme power was vested in sultans of the Ottoman race, that blood being deemed so sacred that no other was thought worthy of the throne. From this elevation these sovereigns could look down and behold all their subjects reduced to the same level before them. The maxims of Turkish policy do not authorise any of those institutions which in other countries limit the exercise or moderate the rigour of monarchical power: they admit neither of any great court with constitutional and permanent jurisdiction to interpose both in enacting laws and in superintending the execution of them, nor of a body of hereditary nobles whose sense of their own pre-eminence, whose consciousness of what is due to their rank and character, whose jealousy of their privi- leges, circumscribe the authority of the prince, and serve not only as a barrier against the excesses of his caprice, but stand as an intermediate order between him and the people. Under the Turkish government the political condition of every subject is equal. To be employed in the service of the sultan is the only circumstance that confers distinction. Even this dis- tinction is rather official than personal, and so closely annexed to the station in which any individual serves that it is scarcely communicated to the persons of those who are placed in them. The highest dignity in the empire does not give any rank or pre-eminence SEctioii Hi.] STATE OF EUROPE. 177 to the family of him who enjoys it. As every man before he is raised to any station of authority must go through the preparatory discipline of a long and ser- vile obedience, 51 the moment he is deprived of power he and his posterity return to the same condition with other subjects and sink back into obscurity. It is the distinguishing and odious characteristic of Eastern despotism that it annihilates all other ranks of men in order to exalt the monarch ; that it leaves nothing to the former, while it gives everything to the latter; that it endeavours to fix in the minds of those who are subject to it the idea of no relation between men but that of a master and of a slave, the former destined to command and to punish, the latter formed to tremble and obey. 58 But, as there are circumstances which frequently obstruct or defeat the salutary effects of the best- regulated governments, there are others which con- tribute to mitigate the evils of the most defective forms of policy. There can, indeed, be no constitu- tional restraints upon the will of a prince in a despotic government; but there may be such as are accidental. Absolute as the Turkish sultans are, they feel themselves circumscribed both by religion, the principle on which their authority is founded, 53 and by the army, the instru- ment which they must employ in order to maintain it. Wherever religion interposes, the will of the sovereign must submit to its decrees. When the Koran hath prescribed any religious rite, hath enjoined any moral duty, or hath confirmed by its sanction any political maxim, the command of the sultan cannot overturn that which a higher authority hath established. The chief restriction, however, on the will of the sultans is> imposed by the military power. An armed force must 41 State of the Turkish Empire, " Note XLIII. by Ryuuut, p. 25. M Rycant, p. 8. 178 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION ill. surround the throne of every despot, to maintain his authority and to execute his commands. As the Turks extended their empire over nations which they did not exterminate, hut reduced to subjection, they found it necessary to render their military establishment nu- merous and formidable. Amruth, their third sultan, in order to form a body of troops devoted to his will, that might serve as the immediate guards of his person and dignity, commanded his officers to seize annually, as the imperial property, the fifth part of the youth taken in war. These, after being instructed in the Mahometan religion, inured to obedience by severe discipline, and trained to warlike exercises, were formed into a body distinguished by the name of janizaries, or new soldiers. Every sentiment which enthusiasm can inspire, every mark of distinction that the favour of the prince could confer, were employed in order to animate this body with martial ardour and with a consciousness of its own pre-eminence. 54 The janizaries soon became the chief strength and pride of the Ottoman armies, and, by their number as well as reputation, were distin- guished above all the troops whose duty it was to attend on the person of the sultan. 55 [1362.] Thus, as the supreme power in every society is pos- sessed by those who have arms in their hands, this for- midable body of soldiers, destined to be the instruments of enlarging the sultan's authority, acquired at the same time the means of controlling it. The janizaries in Constantinople, like the praetorian bands in ancient Eome, quickly perceived all the advantages which they derived from being stationed in the capital, from their union under one standard, and from being masters of the person of the prince. The sultans became no les sensible of their influence and importance. The 44 Prince Cantemir's History of 65 Note XLIV. the Othmaii Empire, p. 87. SECTION ni] STATE OF EUROPE. 170 capicuty, or soldiery of the Porte, was the only power in the empire that a sultan or his vizier had reason to dread. To preserve the fidelity and attachment of the janizaries was the great art of government and the prin- cipal object of attention in the policy of the Ottoman court. Under a monarch whose abilities and vigour of mind fit him for command, they are obsequious instru- ments, execute whatever he enjoins, and render his power irresistible. Under feeble princes, or such as are unfortunate, they become turbulent and mutinous, assume the tone of masters, degrade and exalt sultans at pleasure, and teach those to tremble, on whose nod, at other times, life and death depend. From Mahomet II., who took Constantinople, to Solyman the Magnificent, who began his reign a few months after Charles V. was placed on the imperial throne of Germany, a succession of illustrious princes ruled over the Turkish empire. By their great abili- ties they kept their subjects of every order, military as well as civil, submissive to government, and had the absolute command of whatever force their vast empire was able to exert. Solyman, in particular, who is known to the Christians chiefly as a con- queror, but is celebrated in the Turkish annals as the great lawgiver who established order and police in their empire, governed during his long reign with no less authority than wisdom. He divided his dominions into several districts ; he appointed the number of sol- diers which each should furnish; he appropriated a certain proportion of the land in every province for their maintenance ; he regulated with a minute accu- racy every thing relative to their discipline, their arms, and the nature of their service. He put the finances of the empire into an orderly train of administration ; and, though the taxes in the Turkish dominions, as well as in the other despotic monarchies of the East, are far from N 2 180 A VIEW OF THE [SECTION in. being considerable, he supplied that defect by an atten- tive and severe economy. Nor was it only under such sultans as Solyman, whose talents were no less adapted to preserve internal order than to conduct the operations of war, that the Turkish empire engaged with advantage in its contests with the Christian states. The long succession of able princes which I have mentioned had given such vigour and firmness to the Ottoman government that it seems to have attained during the sixteenth century the highest degree of perfection of which its constitu- tion was capable. Whereas the great monarchies in Christendom were still far from that state which could enable them to act with a full exertion of their force. Besides this, the Turkish troops in that age possessed every advantage which arises from superiority in mili- tary discipline. At the time when Solyman began his reign, the janizaries had been embodied near a cen- tury and a half, and during that long period the severity of their military discipline had in no degree relaxed. The other soldiers, drawn from the provinces of the empire, had been kept almost continually under arms, in the various wars which the sultans had carried on, with hardly an interval of peace. Against troops thus trained and accustomed to service the forces of the Christian powers took the field with great disad- vantage. The most intelligent as well as impartial authors of the sixteenth century acknowledge and lament the superior attainments of the Turks in the military art. 56 The success which almost uniformly attended their arms, in all their wars, demonstrates the justness of this observation. The Christian armies did not acquire that superiority over the Turks which they now possess until the long establishment of stand- M Note XLV. SECTION in.] STATE OF EUROPE. 181 ing forces had improved military discipline among the former, and until various causes and events, which it is not in my province to explain, had corrupted or abolished their ancient warlike institutions among the latter. PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. NOTE I. Sect I. p. 6. THE consternation of the Britons, when invaded by the Picts and Cale- donians, after the Roman legions were called out of the island, may give some idea of the degree of debasement to which the human mind was reduced by long servitude under the Romans. In their supplicatory letter to Aetius, which they call the Groans of Britain, " We know not (say they) which way to turn us. The barbarians drive us to the sea, and the sea forces us back on the barbarians ; between which we have only the choice of two deaths, either to be swallowed up by the waves, or to be slain by the sword." (Histor. Gildas, ap. Gale, Hist. Britan. Script., p. 6.) One can hardly believe this dastardly race to be descendants of that gallant people who repulsed Caesar and defended their liberty so long against the Roman arms. NOTE II. Sect. I. p. 6. The barbarous nations were not only illiterate, but regarded literature with contempt. They found the inhabitants of all the provinces of the i-mpire sunk in effeminacy and averse to war. Such a character was the object of scorn to a high-spirited and gallant race of men. " When we would brand an enemy," says Luitprandus, " with the most disgraceful and contumelious appellation, we call him a Roman ; hoc solo, id est Ramani nomine, quicquid ignobilitatis, quicquid timiditatis, quicquid avaritise, quicquid luxuriae, quicquid mendacii, irnmo quicquid vitiorum est coinprehendentes." (Luitprandi Legatio, apud Murat., Scriptor. Italic., vol. ii. pars. i. p. 48 1.) This degeneracy of manners, illiterate barbarians imputed to their love of learning. Even after they settled in the countries which they had conquered, they would not permit their children to be instructed in any science. " For (said they,) instruction in the sciences tends to corrupt, enervate, and depress the mind ; and he who has been accustomed to tremble under the rod of a pedagogue will never look on a sword or a spear with an undaunted eye." (Procop., de Bello Gothor., lib. i. p. 4, ap. Script. Byz., edit. Venet., voL i.) A considerable number of years elapsed before nations so rude and so unwilling to learn could produce historians capable of recording their transactions or of describing their manners and institutions. By that time the memory of their ancient condition was in a great measure lost, and few monuments remained to, guide their first writers to any Certain knowledge, of i.t... If one expects tQ. 184 PEOOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. j NOTE in. receive any satisfactory account of the manners and laws of the Goths. Lombards, or Franks during their residence in those countries where they were originally seated, from Jornandes", Paulus Warnefridus, or Gregory of Tours, the earliest and most authentic historians of these people, he will be miserably disappointed. Whatever imperfect knowledge has been con- veyed to us of their ancient state we owe not to their own writers, but to the Greek and Roman historians. NOTE III. Sect. I. p. 7. A circumstance related by Priscus, in his history of the embassy to Attila, king of the Huns, gives a striking view of the enthusiastic passion for war which prevailed among the barbarous nations. When the enter- tainment to which that fierce conqueror admitted the Roman ambassadors was ended, two Scythians advanced towards Attila and recited a poem in which they celebrated his victories and military virtues. All the Huns fixed their eyes with attention on the bards. Some seemed to be delighted with the verses ; others, remembering their own battles and exploits, exulted with joy ; while such as were become feeble through age burst out into tears, bewailing the decay of their vigour, and the state of inactivity in. which they were now obliged to remain. Excerpta ex Historia Prisci Rhetoris, ap. Byz. Hist. Scrip., vol. i. p. 45. NOTE IV. Sect. I. p. 12. A remarkable confirmation of both parts of this reasoning occurs in the history of England. The Saxons carried on the conquest of that country with the same destructive spirit which distinguished the other barbarous nations. The ancient inhabitants of Britain were either exterminated, or forced to take shelter among the mountains of Wales, or reduced to servi- tude. The Saxon government, laws, manners, and language were of consequence introduced into Britain, and were so perfectly established that all memory of the institutions previous to their conquest of the country was in a great measure lost. The very reverse of this happened in a subsequent revolution. A single victory placed William the Norman on the throne of England. The Saxon inhabitants, though oppressed, were not exterminated. William employed the utmost efforts of his power and policy to make his new subjects conform in every thing to the Norman standard, but without success. The Saxons, though vanquished, were far more numerous than their conquerors ; when the two races began to incorporate, the Saxon laws and manners gradually gained ground. The Norman institutions became unpopular and odious ; many of them fell into disuse ; and in the English constitution and language at this day many essential parts are manifestly of Saxon, not of Norman extraction. NOTE V. Sect I. p. 12. Procopius, the historian, declines, from a principle of benevolence, to give any particular detail of the cruelties of the Goths ; " lest," says he, " T should transmit a monument and example of inhumanity to succeeding NOTK v.] PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. ages." (Proc., de Bello Goth., lib. iii. cap. 10, ap. Byz. Script., vol. i. p. 126.) But as the change which I have pointed out as a consequence t/f the settlement of the barbarous nations in the countries formerly subject to the Roman empire could not have taken place if the greater part of the ancient inhabitants had not been extirpated, an event of such importance and influence merits a more particular illustration. This will justify me for exhibiting some part of that melancholy spectacle over which humanity prompted Procopius to draw a veil. I shall not, however, disgust my readers by a minute narration, but rest satisfied with collecting some instances of the devastations made by two of the many nations which settled in the empire. The Vandals were the first of the barbarians who invaded Spain. It was one of the richest and most populous of the Roman provinces : the inhabitants had been distinguished for courage, and had defended their liberty against the arms of Rome with greater obstinacy and during a longer course of years than any nation in Europe. But so entirely were they enervated by their subjection to the Romans that the Vandals, who entered the kingdom A.D. 409, completed the conquest of it with such rapidity that in the year 411 these barbarians divided it among them by casting lots. . The desolation occasioned by their invasion is thus described by Idatius, an eye-witness : " The barbarians wasted every thing with hostile cruelty. The pestilence was no less destructive. A dreadful famine raged to such a degree that the living were constrained to feed on the dead bodies of their fellow-citizens ; and all these terrible plagues desolated at once the unhappy kingdoms." (Idatii Chron., ap Biblioth. Patrum, vol. vii. p. 1233, edit. Lugd., 1677.) The Goths having attacked the Vandals in their new settlements, a fierce war ensued ; the country was plundered by both parties ; the cities which had escaped from destruction in the first invasion of the Vandals were now laid in ashes, and the inhabitants exposed to suffer every thing that the wanton cruelty of barbarians could inflict. Idatius describes these scenes of inhumanity, ibid., p. 1235, b. 1236, c. f. A similar account of their devastations is given by Isidorus Hispalensis and other contemporary writers. (Isid., Chron., ap. Grot., Hist. Goth., 732.) From Spain the Vandals passed over into Africa, A.D. 428. Africa was, next to Egypt, the most fertile of the Roman provinces. It was one of the granaries of the empire, and is called by an ancient writer the soul of the commonwealth. Though the army with which the Vandals invaded it did not exceed thirty thousand fight- ing men, they became absolute masters of the province in less than two years. A contemporary author gives a dreadful account of the havoc which they made : " They found a province well cultivated, and enjoying plenty, the beauty of the whole earth. They carried their destructive arms into every comer of it ; they dispeopled it "by their devastations, exterminating every thing with fire and sword. They did not even spare the vines and fruit-trees, that those to whom caves and inaccessible mountains had afforded a retreat might find no nourishment of any kind. Their hostile rage could not be satiated, and there was no place exempted from the effects of it. They tortured their prisoners with the most exquisite cruelty, that they might force from them a discovery of their hidden treasures. The more they discovered, the more they expected, and the more implac- able they became. Neither the infirmities of age nor of sex, neither the 1 86 PEOOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE v. dignity of nobility nor the sanctity of the sacerdotal office, could mitigate nheir fury ; but the more illustrious their prisoners were, the more barbar- ously they insulted them. The public buildings which resisted the violence of the flames they levelled with the ground. They left many cities without an inhabitant. When they approached any fortified placo which their undisciplined army could not reduce, they gathered together i multitude of prisoners, and, putting them to the sword, left their bodies unburied, that the stench of the carcasses might oblige the garrison to abandon it." (Victor Vitensis de Persecutione Africana, ap. Bibl. Patrum, vol. viii. p. 666.) St. Augustin, an African, who survived the conquest oi bis country by the Vandals some years, gives a similar description of theii cruelties. (Opera, vol. x. p. 372, edit. 1616.) About a hundred years after the settlement of the Vandals in Africa, Belisarius attacked and dis- possessed them. Procopius, a contemporary historian, describes the devastation which that war occasioned. " Africa," says he, " was so entirely dispeopled that one might travel several days in it without meeting one man ; and it is no exaggeration to say that in the course of the wai five millions of persons perished." (Proc., Hist. Arcana, cap. 18, ap. Byz. Script., vol. i. p. 315.) I have dwelt longer upon the calamities of this province, because they are described not only by contemporary authors, but by eye-witnesses. The present state of Africa confirms their testimony. Many of the most flourishing and populous cities with which it was filled were so entirely ruined that no vestiges remain to point out where they were situated. That fertile territory, which sustained the Roman empire, still lies in a great measure uncultivated ; and that province, which Victor, in his barbarous Latin, called speciositas totius terrce florentis, is now the retreat of pirates and banditti. While the Vandals laid waste a great part of the empire, the Huns desolated the remainder. Of all the barbarous tribes they were the fiercest and most formidable. Ammianus Marcellinus, a contemporary author, and one of the best of the later historians, gives an account of their policy and manners, which nearly resemble those of the Scythians described by the ancients, and of the Tartars known to the moderns. Some parts of their character, and several of their customs, are not unlike those of the savages in North America. Their passion for war was extreme. " As in polished societies (says Ammianus) ease and tranquillity are courted, they delight in war and dangers. He who falls in battle is reckoned happy. They who die of old age or of disease are deemed infamous. They boast with the utmost exultation of the number of enemies whom they have slain, and, as the most glorious of all ornaments, they fasten the scalps of those who have fallen by their hands to the trappings of their horses." (Ammian. Marc., lib. xxxi. p. 477, edit. Gronov., Lugd., 1693.) Their incursions into the empire began in the fourth century ; and the Romans, though no strangers, by that time, to the effects of barbarous rage, were astonished at the cruelty of their devastations. Thrace, Pannonia, and Illyricum were the countries which they first laid desolate. As they had at first no inten- tiou of settling in Europe, they made only inroads of short continuance into the empire ; but these were frequent ; and Procopius computes that in each of these, at a medium, two hundred thousand persons perished, or were carried off as slaves. (Procop., Hist. Arcan., ap. Byz. Script., vol. i. NOTE v.] PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 187 p. 316.) Thrace, the best cultivated province in that quarter of the empire, was converted into a desert ; and when Priscus accompanied the ambassadors sent to Attila there were no inhabitants in some of the cities, but a few miserable people who had taken shelter among the ruins of the churches ; and the fields were covered with the bones of those who had fallen by the sword. (Priscus, ap. Byz. Script., vol. i. p. 34.) Attila became king of the Huns, A.D. 434. He is one of the greatest and most enterprising conquerors mentioned in history. He extended his empire over all the vast countries comprehended under the general names of Scythia and Germany in the ancient division of the world. While he was carrying on his wars against the barbarous nations, he kept the Roman empire under perpetual apprehensions, and extorted enormous subsidies from the timid and effeminate monarchs who governed it. In the year 451 he entered Gaul, at the head of an army composed of all the various nations which he had subdued. It was more numerous than any with which the barbarians had hitherto invaded the empire. The devastations which he committed were horrible. Not only the open country, but the most nourishing cities, were desolated. The extent and cruelty of his devastations are described by Salvianus de Gubernat. Dei, edit. Baluz., Par. 1669, p. 139, etc., and by Idatius, ubi supra, p. 1235. Aetius put a stop to his progress in that country by the famous battle of Chalons, in which (if we may believe the historians of that age) three hundred thousand pei-sons perished. (Idat., ibid. ; Jornandes de Rebus Geticis, ap. Grot., Hist. Gothor., p. 671, Amst, 1665.) But the next year he resolved to attack the centre of the empire, and, marching into Italy, wasted it with rage inflamed by the sense of his late disgrace. What Italy suffered by the Huns exceeded all the calamities which the preceding incursions of the barbarians had brought upon it Conringius has collected several passages from the ancient historians which prove that the devastations committed by the Vandals and Huns in the countries situated on the banks of the Rhine were no less cruel and fatal to the human race. (Exercitatio de Urbibus Germanise, Opera, vol. i. p. 488.) It is endless, it is shocking, to follow these destroyers of mankind through so many scenes of horror, and to contemplate the havoc which they made of the human species. But the state in which Italy appears to have been during several ages after the barbarous nations settled in it is the most decisive proof of the cruelty as well as extent of their devastations. Whenever any country is thinly inhabited, trees and shrubs spring up in the uncultivated fields, and, spreading by degrees, form large forests ; by the overflowing of rivers and the stagnating of waters, other parts of it are converted into lakes and marshes. Ancient Italy, which the Romans rendered the seat of elegance and luxury, was cultivated to the highest pitch. But so effectually did the devastations of the barbarians destroy all the effects of Roman industry and cultivation that in the eighth century a considerable part of Italy appears to have been covered with forests and marshes of great extent. Muratori enters into a minute detail concerning the situation and limits of several of these, and proves by the most authentic evidence that great tracts of territory in all the different provinces of Italy were either overrun with wood or laid under water. Nor did these occupy parts of the country naturally barren or of little value, but were spread over districts which 1 SS 1'ROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE VL ancient writers represent as extremely fertile and which at present are highly cultivated. (Muratori, Antiquitates Italicse Medii .ZEvi, dissert, xxi., vol. ii. pp. 149, 153, etc.) A strong proof of this occurs in a description of the city of Modena, by an author of the tenth century. (Murat., Script. Rerum Italic., vol. iii. pars. ii. p. 691.) The state of desc lo- tion in other countries of Europe seems to have "been the same. In many of the most early charters now extant, the lands granted to monasteries or to private persons are distinguished into such as are cultivated or inhabited, and such as were eremi, desolate. In many in- stances lauds are granted to persons because they had taken them from the desert, ab eremo, and had cultivated and planted them with inhabitants. This appears from a charter of Charlemagne, published by Eckhart, de Rebus Francis Orientalis, vol. ii. p. 864, and from many charters of Ms successors quoted by Du Cange, voc. Eremus. Wherever a right of pro- perty in land can be thus acquired, it is evident that the country must be extremely desolate and thinly peopled. The first settlers in America obtained possession of land by such a title. Whoever was able to clear and to cultivate a field was recognised as the proprietor. His industry merited such a recompense. The grants in the charters which I have mentioned flow from a similar principle, and there must have been some resemblance in the state of the countries. Muratori adds that during the eighth and ninth centuries Italy was greatly infested by wolves and other wild beasts ; another mark of its being destitute of inhabitants. (Murat., Antiq., vol. ii. p. 163.) Thus Italy, the pride of the ancient world for its fertility and cultivation, was reduced to the state of a country newly peopled and lately rendered habitable. I am sensible not only that some of these descriptions of the devastations, which I have quoted, may be exaggerated, but that the barbarous tribes, in making their settlements, did not proceed invariably in the same manner. Some of them seemed to be bent on exterminating the ancient inhabitants ; others were more disposed to incorporate with them. It is not my province either to inquire into the causes which occasioned this variety in the conduct of the conquerors, or to describe the state of those countries where the ancient inhabitants were treated most mildly. The facts which I have produced are sufficient to justify the account which I have given in the text, and to prove that the destruction of the human species, occasioned by the hostile invasions of the Northern nations and their subsequent settlements, was much greater than many authors seem to imagine. NOTE VI. Sect I. p. 14. I have observed, Note II., that our only certain information concerning the ancient state of the barbarous nations must be derived from the Greek and Roman writers. Happily, an account of the institutions and customs of one people, to which those of all the rest seem to have been in a great measure similar, has been transmitted to us by two authors, the most capable, perhaps, that ever wrote, of observing them with profound dis- cernment and of describing them with propriety and force. The reader NOTE vi.] PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 180 must perceive that Caesar and Tacitus are the authors whom I have in view. The former gives a short account of the ancient Germans in a lew chapters of the sixth book of his Commentaries ; the latter wrote a treatise expressly on that subject. These are the most precious and in- structive monuments of antiquity to the present inhabitants of Europe. From them we learn, 1. That the state of society among the ancient Germans was of the rudest and most simple form. They subsisted entirely by hunting or by pasturage. (Caes., lib. vi. c. 21.) They neglected agriculture, and lived chiefly on milk, cheese, and flesh. (Ibid., c. 22.) Tacitus agrees with him in most of these points. (De Morib. Germ., c. 14, 15, 23.) The Goths were equally negligent of agriculture. (Prise. Rhet., ap. By/.. Script., v. i. p. 31, B.) Society was in the same state among the Huns, who disdained to cultivate the earth or to touch a plough. (Amm. Marcel., lib. xxxi. p. 475.) The same manners took place among the Alans. (Ibid., p. 477.) While society remains in this simple state, men by uniting together scarcely relinquish any portion of their natural in- dependence. Accordingly, we are informed, 2. That the authority of civil government was extremely limited among the Germans. During times of peace they had no common or fixed magistrate, but the chief men of every district dispensed justice and accommodated differences. (Ctes. ibid., c. 23.) Their kings had not absolute or unbounded power; their authority consisted rather in the privilege of advising than in the power of commanding. Matters of small consequence were determined by t,he chief men ; affairs of importance, by the whole community. (Tacit., c. 7, 11.) The Huns, in like manner, deliberated in common concerning every business of moment to the society, and were not sub- ject to the rigour of regal authority. (Amm. Marcel., lib. xxxi. p. 474.) 3. Every individual among the ancient Germans was left at liberty to choose whether he would take part in any military enterprise which was proposed ; there seems to have been no obligation to engage in it imposed on him by public authority. " When any of the chief men proposes an expedition, such as approve of the cause and of the leader rise up and declare their intention of following him ; after coming under this engage- ment, those who do not fulfil it are considered as deserters and traitors, and are looked upon as infamous." (Caes., ibid., c. 23.) Tacitus plainly points at the same custom, though in terms more obscure. (Tacit., c. 11.) 4. As every individual was so independent, and master in so great a degree of his own actions, it became, of consequence, the great object of every person among the Germans, who aimed at being a leader, to gain adherents and attach them to his person and interest. These adherents Caesar calls ambacti and clientes, i.e., retainers or clients ; Tacitus, comites, or com- panions. The chief distinction and power of the leaders consisted in being attended by a numerous band of chosen youth. This was their pride as well as ornament during peace, and their defence in war. The leaders gained or preserved the favour of these retainers by presents of armour and of horses, or by the profuse though inelegant hospitality with which they entertained them. (Tacit., c. 14, 15.) 5. Another consequence of the personal liberty and independence which the Germans retained, even after they united in society, was their circumscribing the criminal juris- 190 PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE vi. diction of the magistrate within very narrow limits, and their not only claiming, but exercising, almost all the rights of private resentment and revenge. Their magistrates had not the power either of imprisoning or of inflicting any corporal punishment on a free man. (Tacit., c. 7.) Every person was obliged to avenge the wrongs which his parents or friends had sustained. Their enmities were hereditary, but not irre- concilable. Even murder was compensated by paying a certain num- ber of cattle. (Tacit., c. 21.) A part of the fine went to the king, or state, a part to the person who had been injured, or to his kindred. Ibid., c. 12. Those particulars concerning the institutions and manners of the Ger- mans, though well known to every person conversant in ancient literature, I have thought proper to arrange in this order, and to lay before such of my readers as may be less acquainted with these facts, both because they confirm the account which I have given of the state of the barbarous nations, and because they tend to illustrate all the observations I shall have .occasion to make concerning the various changes in their government and customs. The laws and customs introduced by the barbarous nations into their new settlements are the best commentary on the writings of Caesar and Tacitus ; and their observations are the best key to a perfect knowledge of these laws and customs. One circumstance with respect to the testimonies of Caesar and Tacitus concerning the Germans merits attention. Caesar wrote his brief account of their manners more than a hundred years before Tacitus composed his Treatise de Moribus Germanorum. A hundred years make a considerable period in the progress of national manners, especially if during that time those people who are rude and unpolished have had much communication with more civilised states. This was the case with the Germans. Their intercourse with the Romans began when Caesar crossed the Rhine, and increased greatly during the interval between that event and the time when Tacitus flourished. We may accordingly observe that the manners of the Germans in his time, which Caesar describes, were less improved than those of the same people as delineated by Tacitus. Besides this, it is re- markable that there was a considerable difference in the state of society among the different tribes of Germans. The Suiones were so much im- proved that they began to be corrupted. (Tacit., c. 44.) The Fenni were so barbarous that it is wonderful how they were able to subsist. (Ibid., c. 46.) Whoever undertakes to describe the manners of the Ger- mans, or to found any political theory upon the state of society among them, ought carefully to attend to both these circumstances. Before I quit this subject, it may not be improper to observe that, though successive alterations in their institutions, together with the gradual progress of refinement, have made an entire change in the manners of the various people who conquered the Roman empire, there is still one race of men nearly in the same political situation with theirs when they first settled in their new conquests ; I mean the various tribes and nations of savages in North America. It cannot, then, be considered either as a digression, or as an improper indulgence of curiosity, to inquire whether this similarity in their political state has occasioned any resemblance between their character and manners. If the likeness turns out to be NOTE vi.] PKOOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS 191 striking, it is a stronger proof that a just account has been given of the ancient inhabitants of Europe than the testimony even of Caasar or of Tacitus. 1. The Americans subsist chiefly by hunting and fishing. Some tribes neglect agriculture entirely. Among those who cultivate some small spot near their huts, that, together with all works of labour, is performed by the women. (P. Charlevoix, Journal historique d'un Voyage de 1'Ame- rique, 4to, Par. 1744, p. 334.) In such a state of society, the common wants of men being few and their mutual dependence upon each other femall, their union is extremely imperfect and feeble, and they continue to enjoy their natural liberty almost unimpaired. It is the first idea of an American that every man is born free and independent, and that no power on earth hath any right to diminish or circumscribe his natural liberty. There is hardly any appearance of subordination, either in civil or domestic government. Every o:ie does what he pleases. A father and mother live with their children like persons whom chance has brought together and whom no common bond unites. Their manner of educating their children is suitable to this principle. They never chastise or punish them, even during their infancy. As they advance in years, they continue to be entirely masters of their own actions, and seem not to be conscious of being responsible for any part of thfciv -ond'act (Ibid., pp. 272, 273.) 2. The power of their civil magistrates is extremely limited. Among most of their tribes, the sachem, or chief, is elective. A council of old men is chosen to assist him, without whose advice he determines no affair of im- portance. The sachems neither possess nor claim any great degree of authority. They propose and entreat, rather than command. The obedience of their people is altogether voluntary. (Ibid., pp. 266, 268.) 3. The savages of America engage in their military enterprises, not from constraint, but choice. When war is resolved, a chief arises and offers himself to be the leader. Such as are willing (for they compel no person) stand up one after another and sing their war-song. But if, after this, any of these should refuse to follow the leader to whom they have engaged, his life would be in danger, and he would be considered as the most infamous of men. (Ibid., pp. 217, 218.) 4. Such as engage to follow any leader expect to be treated by him with great attention and respect ; and he is obliged to make them presents of considerable value. (Ibid., p. 218.) 5. Among the Americans, the magistrate has scarcely any criminal juris- diction. (Ibid., p. 272.) Upon receiving any injury, the person or family offended may inflict what punishment they please on the person who was the author of it (Ibid., p. 274.) Their resentment and demre of vengeance are excessive and implacable. Time can neither extinguish nor abate it. It is the chief inheritance parents leave to their children ; it is transmitted from generation to generation, until an occasion be found of satisfying it. (Ibid., p. 309.) Sometimes, however, the offended party is appeased. A compensation is paid for a murder that has been com- mitted. The relations of the deceased receive it ; and it consists most commonly of a captive taken in war, who, being substituted in place of the person who was murdered, assumes his name and is adopted into his family. (Ibid., p. 274.) The resemblance holds in many other particu- lars. It is sufficient for my purpose to have pointed out the similarity oi 192 PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE vlf. those great features which distinguish and characterise both peopla Bochart, and other philologists of the last century, who, with more erudi- tion than science, endeavoured to trace the migrations of various nations, and who were apt upon the slightest appearance of resemblance to find an affinity between nations far removed from each other, and to conclude that they were descended from the same ancestors, would hardly have failed, on viewing such an amazing similarity, to pronounce with confidence "that the Germans and Americans must be the same people." But a philosopher will satisfy himself with observing " that the characters of nations depend on the state of society in which they live, and on the political institutions established among them ; and that the human mind, whenever it is placed in the same situation, will, in ages the most distant and in countries the most remote, assume the same form and be distinguished by the same manners." I have pushed the comparison between the Germans and Americans no further than was necessary for the illustration of my subject. I do not pretend that the state of society in the two countries was perfectly similar in every respect. Many of the German tribes were more civilised than the Americans. Some of them were not unacquainted with agriculture ; almost all of them had flocks of tame cattle, and depended upon them for the chief part of their subsistence. Most of the American tribes subsist by hunting, and are in a ruder and more simple state than the ancient Germans. The resemblance, however, between their condition is greater, perhaps, than any that history affords an opportunity of observing between any two races of uncivilised people ; and this has produced a surprising similarity of manners. NOTE VII. Soct. I. p. 14. The booty gained by an army belonged to the army. The king himself had no part of it but what he acquired by lot. A remarkable instance of this occurs in the history of the Franks. The army of Clovis, the founder of the French monarchy, having plundered a church, carried off, among other sacred utensils, a vase of extraordinary size and beauty. The bishop sent deputies to Clovis beseeching him to restore the vase, that it might be again employed in the sacred services to which it had been consecrated. Olovis desired the deputies to follow him to Soissons, as the booty was to be divided in that place, and promised that if the lot should give him the disposal of the vase he would grant what the bishop desired. When lie came to Soissons, and all the booty was placed in one great heap in the middle of the army, Clovis entreated that before making the division they would give him that vase over and above his share. All appeared willing to gratify the king and to comply with his request, when a fierce and haughty soldier lifted up his battle-axe, and, striking the vase with the utmost violence, cried out, with a loud voice, " You shall receive nothing here but that to which the lot gives you a right." Gregor. Turon., Histor. Francorum, lib. ii. c. 27, p. 70, Par. 1610. vm. j PllOOFtJ AND ILLUSTitATluNS. 1U3 NOTE VIII. Sect I. p. 16. The history of the establishment and progress of the feudal system is an interesting object to all the nations of Europe. lu some countries their Jurisprudence and laws are still in a great measure feudal. In others, many forms and practices established by custom, or founded on statutes, took their rise from the feudal law, and cannot be understood without attending to the ideas peculiar to it. Several authors of the highest reputation for genius and erudition have endeavoured to illustrate this subject, but still many parts of it are obscure. I shall endeavour to trace with precision the progress and variation of ideas concerning property in land among the barbarous nations, and shall attempt to point out the causes which introduced these changes, as well as the effects which followed upon them. Property in land seems to have gone through four successive changes among the people who settled in the various provinces of the Roman empire. I. While the barbarous nations remained in their original countries, their property in land was only temporary, and they had no certain limits to their possession. After feeding their flocks in one district, they removed with them, and with their wives and families, to another, and abandoned that likewise in a short time. They were not, in consequence of this imperfect species of property, brought under any positive or formal obliga- tion to serve the community ; all their services were purely voluntary. Every individual was at liberty to choose how far he would contribute towards carrying on any military enterprise. If he followed a leader in any expedition, it was from attachment, not from a sense of obligation. The clearest proof of this has been produced in Note VI. While property continued in this state, we can discover nothing that bears any resemblance to a feudal tenure, or to the subordination and military service which the feudal system introduced. II. Upon settling in the countries which they had subdued, the vic- torious troops divided the conquered lands. Whatever portion of them fell to a soldier, he seized as the recompense due to his valour, as a settle- ment acquired by his own sword. He took possession of it as a freeman in full property. He enjoyed it during his own life, and could dispose of it at ple;isure, or transmit it as an inheritance to his children. Thus pro- perty in land became fixed. It was at the same time allodial ; i.e., the possessor had the entire right of property and dominion ; he held of no sovereign or superior lord to whom he was bound to do homage and per- form service. But as these new proprietors were in some danger (as has been observed in the text) of being disturbed by the remainder of the ancient inhabitants, ancf In still greater danger of being attacked by suc- cessive colonies of borlmans as fierce and rapacious as themselves, they saw the necessity of coming under obligations to defend the community more explicit than those to which they had been subject in their original habitations. On this account, immediately upon their fixing in their new settlements, every freeman became bound to take arms in defence of the community, and, if he refused or neglected so to do, was liable to a con- VOL. I. O 194 PfiOOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS, [NOTE viii eideiable penalty. I do not mean that any contract of this kind was formally concluded or mutually ratified by any legal solemnity. It was established by tacit consent, like the other compacts which hold society together. The mutual security and preservation made it the interest of all to recognize its authority and to enforce the observation of it. We can trace back this new obligation on the proprietors of land to a very early period in the history of the Franks. Chilperic, who began his reign A.D. 562, exacted a fine, bannos jussit exigi, from certain persons who had refused to accompany him in an expedition. (Gregor. Turon., lib. v. c. 26, p. 211.) Childebert, who began his reign A.D. 576, proceeded in the same manner against others who had been guilty of a like crime. (Ibid., lib. vii. c. 42, p. 342.) Such a fine could not have been exacted while property continued in its first state and military service was entirely volun- tary. Charlemagne ordained that every freeman who possessed five mansi, i.e., sixty acres, of land, in property, should march in person against the enemy. (Capitul., A.D. 807.) Louis le Debonnaire, A.D. 815, granted lands to certain Spaniards who fled from the Saracens, and allowed them to settle in his territories, on condition that they should serve in the army like other freemen. (Capitul., vol. i. p. 500.) By land possessed in pro- perty, which is mentioned in the law of Charlemagne, we are to under- stand, according to the style of that age, allodial land ; alodes and proprietas, alodum and proprium, being words perfectly synonymous. (Du Cange, voce Alodis.} The clearest proof of the distinction between allodial and beneficiary possession is contained in two charters published by Muratori, by which it appears that a person might possess one part of his estate as allodial, which he could dispose of at pleasure, the other as a beneficium, of which he had only the usufruct, the property returning to the superior lord on his demise. (Antiq. Ital. Medii ^Evi, vol. i. pp. 559, 565.) The same distinction is pointed out in a capitulare of Charle- magne, A.D. 812, edit. Baluz., vol. i. p. 491. Count Everard, who married a daughter of Louis le Debonnaire, in the curious testament by which he disposes of his vast estate among his children, distinguishes between what he possessed proprietate and what he held beneficio; and it appears that the greater part was allodial, A.D. 837. Aub. Miraei Opera Diplomatica, Lovan., 1723, vol. i. p. 19. In the same manner liber homo is commonly opposed to vassus or vassallus, the former denotes an allodial proprietor, the latter one who held of a superior. These free men were under an obligation to serve the state ; and this duty was considered as so sacred that freemen were prohibited from entering into holy orders unless they had obtained the consent of the sovereign. The reason given for this in the statute is remarkable : " For we are informed that some do so not so much out of devotion as in order to avoid that military service which they are bound to perform." (Capitul., lib. i. 114.) If upon being summoned into the field any freeman refused to obey, a full herebannum, i.e., a fine of sixty crowns, was to be exacted from him according to the law of the Franks. (Capit. Car. Magn., ap. Leg. Longob., lib. i. tit. 14, 13, p. 539.) This expression, according to the ]aw of the Franks, seems to imply that both the obligation to serve, and the penalty on those that disregarded it, were coeval with the laws made by the Franks at their first settlement in Gaul. This fine was levied with NOTE viii.] PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 195 such rigour " that if any person convicted of this crime was insolvent he was reduced to servitude, and continued in that state until imch time as hia labour should amount to the value of the lierebannum." (Ibid.) The ninperor Lotharius rendered the penalty still more severe ; and if any person possessing such an extent of property as made it incumbent on him to take the field in person refused to obey the summons, all his goods were declared to be forfeited, and he himself might be punished with banish- ment. Murat., Script. Ital., vol. i. pars. ii. p. 153. III. Property in land having thus become fixed, and subject to military service, another change was introduced, though slowly and step by step. We learn from Tacitus that the chief men among the Germans endeavoured to attach to their persons and interests certain adherents whom he calls comites. These fought under their standard and followed them in all their enterprises. The same custom continued among them in their new settle- ments, and those attached or devoted followers were called fideles, antrus- tiones, homines in truste dominica, leudes. Tacitus informs us that the rank of a comes was deemed honourable. (De Morib., Germ., c. 13.) The composition, which is the standard by which we must judge of the rank and condition of persons in the Middle Ages, paid for the murder of one in truste dominica, was triple to that paid for the murder of a freeman. (Leg. Salicor., tit. 44, 1 et 2.) While the Germans remained in their own country, they courted the favour of these comites by presents of arms and horses, and by hospitality. (See Note VI.) As long as they had no fixed property in land, these were the only gifts that they could bestow, and the only reward which their followers desired. But upon their settling in the countries which they conquered, and when the value of property came to be understood among them, instead of those slight presents, the kings and chieftains bestowed a more substantial recompense in land on their adherents. These grants were called beneficia, because they were gratuitous donations ; and honores, because they were regarded as marks of distinction. What were the services originally exacted in return for these beneficia cannot be determined with aksolute precision ; because there are no records so ancient. When allodial possessions were first rendered feudal, they were not at once subjected to all the feudal services. The transition here, as in all other changes of importance, was gradual. As the great object of a feudal vassal was to obtain protection, when allodial proprietors first consented to become vassals of any powerful leader they continued to retain as much of their ancient independence as was consistent with that new relation. The homage which they did to their superior, of whom they chose to hold, was called homagium planum, and bound them to nothing more than fidelity, but without any. obligation either of military service or attendance in the courts of their superior. Of this homagium planum some traces, though obscure, may still be discovered. (Biussel, torn, i. p. 97.) Among the ancient writs published by D. D. de Vic and Vaisette, Hist, de Langued., are a great many which they call homagia. They seem to be an intermediate step between the homagium planum men- tioned by Brussel, and the engagement to perform complete feudal service. The one party promises protection and grants certain castles or lands ; the other engages to defend the person of the grantor, and to assist him like- wise in defending his property as often as he shall be summoned to do so. o 2 19t) PROOFS AND ILLUSTEATIONS. [NOTE vm. But these engagements are accompanied with none of the feudal formalities, and no mention is made of any of the other feudal services. They appear i-ather to he a mutual contract between equals than the engagement of a vassal to perform services to a superior lord. (Preuves de 1'Hist. de Lang., torn. ii. p. 173, et passim.) As soon as men were accustomed to these, the other feiidal services were gradually introduced. M. de Montesquieu considers these beneficia as fiefs, which originally subjected those who held them to military service. (L'Esprit desLoix, 1. xxx. c. 3 et 16.) M. 1'Abbe' de Mably contends that such as held these were at first subjected to no other service than what was incumbent on every freeman. (Observations sur 1'Histoire cle France, i. 356.) But upon comparing their proofs and reasonings and conjectures it seems to he evident that as every freeman, in consequence of his allodial property, was bound to serve the community tinder a severe penalty, no good reason can be assigned for conferring these beneficia if they did not subject such as received them to some new obliga- tion. Why should a king have stripped himself of his domain, if he had not expected that by parcelling it out he might acquire a right to services to which he had formerly no title ] We may then warrantably conclude, " That as allodial property subjected those who possessed it to serve the community, so beneficia subjected such as held them to personal service and fidelity to him from whom they received these lands." These beneficia were granted originally only during pleasure. No circumstance relating to the customs of the Middle Ages is better ascertained than this ; and innumerable proofs of it might be added to those produced in L'Esprit des Loix, L xxx. c. 16, and by Du Cange, vocc. Beneficium et Feudum. IV. But the possession of benefices did not continue long in this state. A precarious tenure during pleasure was not sufficient to satisfy such as held lands, and by various means they gradually obtained a confirmation of their benefices during life. (Feudor., lib. L tit i.) Du Cange pro- duces several quotations from ancient charters and chronicles in proof of this. (Gloss., voc. Beneficium.) After this it was easy to obtain or extort charters rendering beneficia hereditary, fii-st in the direct line, then in the collateral, and at last in the female line. Leg. Longob., lib. iii. tit. 8 ; Du Cange, voc. Beneficium. It is no easy matter to fix the precise tune when each of these changes took place. M. 1'Abbe' Mably conjectures, with some probability, that Charles Martel first introduced the practice of granting beneficia for life. (Observat., torn, i pp. 103, 160.) And that Louis le Debonnaire was among the first who rendered them hereditary, is evident from the authorities to which he refers. (Ibid., 429.) Mabillon, however, has published a placitum of Louis le Ddbonnaire, A.J>. 860, by which it appears that he still continued to grant some beneficia only during life. (De Re Dip- lomatica, lib. vL p. 353.) In the year 889, Odo, king of France, granted lands to " Ricabodo, fideli suo, jure beneficiario et fructuario," during his own life : and if he should die, and a son were bom to him, that right was to continue during the life of his son. (Mabillon, ut supra, p. 556.) This was an intermediate step between fiefs merely during life and fiefs hereditary to perpetuity. While beneficia continued under their first form, and were held only during pleasure, he who granted them not only exer- cised the dominium, or prerogative of superior lord, but he retained th* (TOTE vni.] PBOOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 197 property, giving his vassal only the usufruct. But under the latter form, when they became hereditary, although feudal lawyers continued to define a beneficium agreeably to its original nature, the property was in effect taken out of the hands of the superior lords and lodged in those of the vassal. As soon as the reciprocal advantages of the feudal mode of tenure came to be understood by superiors as well as vassals, .that species of hold- ing became so agreeable to both that not only lands, but casual rents, such as the profits of a toll, the fare paid at ferries, etc., the salaries or perquisites of offices, and even pensions themselves, were granted and held as fiefs ; and military service was promised and exacted on account of these. (Morice, Me'm. pour servir de Preuves k 1'Hist. de Bretagne, torn. ii. pp. 78, 690 ; Brussel, torn. i. p. 41.) How absurd soever it may seem to grant or to hold such precarious and casual property as a fief, there are instances of feudal tenure still more singular. The profits arising from the masses said at an altar were properly an ecclesiastical revenue, belonging to the clergy of the church or monastery which per- formed that duty ; but these were sometimes seized by the powerful barons. In order to ascertain their right to them, they held them as fiefs of the Church, and parcelled them out in the same manner as other pro- perty to their sub-vassals. (Bouquet, Recueil des Hist., vol. x. pp. 238, 480.) The same spirit of encroachment which rendered fiefs hereditary led the nobles to extort from their sovereigns hereditary grants of offices. Many of the great offices of the crown became hereditary in most of the kingdoms in Europe ; and so conscious were monarchs of this spirit of usurpation among the nobility, and so solicitous to guard against it, that on some occasions they obliged the persons whom they promoted to any office of dignity to grant an obligation that neither they nor their heirs should claim it as belonging to them by hereditary right. A re- markable instance of this is produced, Me'm. de 1'Acad. des Inscrip., torn. xxx. p. 595. Another occurs in the Thesaur. Anecdot., published by Martene et Durand, voL i. p. 873. This revolution in property occasioned a change corresponding to it in political government ; the great vassals of the crown, as they acquired such extensive possessions, usurped a proportional degree of power, depressed the jurisdiction of the crown, and trampled on the privileges of the people. It is on account of this connection that it becomes an object of importance in history to trace the progress of feudal property ; for upon discovering in what state property was at any particular period we may determine with precision what was the degree of power possessed by the king or by the nobility at that juncture. One circumstance more, with respect to the changes which property underwent, deserves attention. I have shown that when the various tribes of barbarians divided their conquests in the fifth and sixth centuries the property which they acquired was allodial ; but in several parts of Europe property had become almost entirely feudal by the beginning of the tenth century. The former species of property seems to be so much better and more desirable than the latter that such a change appears sur- prising, especially when we are informed that allodial property was fre- quently converted into feudal by a voluntary deed of the possessor. The motives which determined them to a choice so repugnant to the ideas of modern times concerning property have been investigated and explained by 198 PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE vm. M. dc Montesquieu, with his usual discernment and accuracy, lib. xxxi. c. 8. The most considerable is that of which we have a hint in Lambertu& Ardensis, an ancient writer quoted by Du Cange, voce Alodis. In those times of anarchy and disorder which became general in Europe after the death of Charlemagne, when there was scarcely any union among the different members of the community, and individuals were exposed, single and undefended by government, to rapine and oppression, it became necessary for every man to have a powerful protector, under whose banner he might range himself and obtain security against enemies whom singly he could not oppose. For this reason he relinquished his allodial independence, and subjected himself to the feudal services, that he might find safety under the patronage of some respectable superior. In some parts oi Europe this change from allodial to feudal property became so general that he who possessed land had no longer any liberty of choice left : he was obliged to recognize some liege-lord and to hold of him. Thus, Beaumanoir informs us that in the counties of Clermont and Beauvois, if the lord or count discovered any land within his jurisdiction for which no service was performed, and which paid to him no taxes or customs, he might instantly seize it as his own ; for, says he, according to our custom, no man can hold allodial property. (Coust, chap. 24, p. 123.) Upon the same principle is founded a maxim which has at length become general in the law of France, Nulle terre sans seigneur. In other provinces of France allodial property seems to have remained longer unalienated and to have been more highly valued. A great number of charters, con- taining grants or sales or exchanges of allodial lands in the province of Languedoc, are published in Hist, gene'r. de Langued., par. D. D. de Vic et Vaisette, torn. ii. During the ninth, tenth, and great part of the eleventh century the property in that province seems to have been entirely allodial ; and scarcely any mention of feudal tenures occurs in the deeds of that country. The state of property during these centuries seems to have been perfectly similar in Catalonia and the country of Rousillon, as appears from the original charters published in the Appendix to Petr. de la Marca's treatise de Marca sive Limite Hispanico. Allodial property seems to have continued in the Low Countries to a period still later. During the eleventh, twelfth, and thirteenth centuries this species of pro- perty appears to have been of considerable extent. (Mirsei Opera Diplom., vol. i pp. 34, 74, 75, 83, 817, 296, 842, 847, 578.) Some vestiges of allodial property appear there as late as the fourteenth centuiy. (Ibid., p. 218.) Several facts which prove that allodial property subsisted in different parts of Europe long after the introduction of feudal tenuies,, and which tend to illustrate the distinction between these two different species of possession, are produced by M. Houard, Anciennes Loix des Francois, conserve'es dans les Coutumes Angloises, vol. i. p. 192, etc. The notions of men with respect to property vary according to the diversity of their un- derstandings and the caprice of their passions. At the same time that some persons were fond of relinquishing allodial property in order to hold it by feudal tenure, others seem to have been solicitous to convert their fiefs into allodial property. An instance of this occurs in a charter of Louis le DeTjonnaire, published by Eckharcl, Commentarii de Rebus Francise Orientalis, vol. ii p. 885. Another occurs in the year 1299 NOTE vin.] PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 199 (Reliquiae MSS. omnis ^Evi, by Ludwig, vol. i. p. 209) ; and even one as late as the year 1337 (ibid., vol. vii. p. 40). The same thing took place in the Low Countries. Miraei Oper., i 52. In tracing these various revolutions of property I have hitherto chiefly confined myself to what happened in France, because the ancient monuments of that nation have either been more carefully pre- served, or have been more clearly illustrated, than those of any people in Europe. In Italy the same revolutions happened in property and succeeded each other in the same order. There ia some ground, however, for conjectur- ing that allodial property continued longer in estimation among the Italians than among the French. It appears that many of the charters granted by the emperors in the ninth century conveyed an allodial right to land. (Murat., Antiq. Med. JEvi, vol. i. p. 575, etc.) But in the eleventh century we find some examples of persons who resigned their allodial property and received it back as a feudal tenure. (Ibid., p. 610, etc.) Muratori observes that the word feudum, which came to be substituted in place of beneficium, does not occur in any authentic charter previous to the eleventh century. (Ibid., p. 594.) A charter of King Robert of France, A.r>. 1008, is the earliest deed in which I have met with the word feudvm. (Bouquet, Recueil des Historiens des Gaules et de la France, torn. x. p. 593, b.) This word occurs, indeed, in an edict, A.D. 790, published by Brussel, voL i. p. 77. But the authenticity of that deed has been called in question, and perhaps the frequent use of the word feudum in it is an additional reason for doing so. The account which I have given of the nature both of allodial and feudal possessions receives some confirmation from the etymology of the words themselves. Alodeor allodium is compounded of the German particle an and lot, i.e., land obtained by lot (Wachteri Glossar. Germanicum, voc. Allodium, p. 35.) It appears from the authori- ties produced by him, and by Du Cange, voc. Sors, that the Northern nations divided the lands which they had conquered in this manner. Feodum is compounded of od, possession or estate, and feo, wages, pay ; intimating that it was stipendiary and granted as a recompense for service. Wachterus, ibid., voc. Feodum, p. 441. The progress of the feudal system among the Germans was perfectly similar to that which we have traced in France. But as the emperors of Germany, especially after the imperial crown passed from the des- cendants of Charlemagne to the house of Saxony, were far superior to the contemporary monarchs of France in abilities, the imperial vassals did not aspire so early to independence, nor did they so soon obtain the privilege of possessing their benefices by hereditary right. According to the com- pilers of the Libri Feudorum, Conrad II., or the Salic, was the first emperor who rendered fiefs hereditary. (Lib. i tit i.) Conrad began his reign A.D. 1024. Ludovicus Pius, under whose reign grants of hereditary fiefs were frequent in France, succeeded his father A.D. 814. Not only was this innovation so much later in being introduced among the vassals of the German emperors, but even after Conrad had established it the law continued favourable to the ancient practice ; and unless the charter of the vassal bore expressly that the fief descended to his heirs, it was pre- jumed to be granted only during life. (Lib. Feud., ibid.) Even after the 200 PEOOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE ix. alteration made by Conrad, it was not uncommon in Germany to grant fiefs only for life. A charter of this kind occurs as late as the year 1376. (Charta, ap. Boehmer., Princip. Jur. Feud., p. 361.) The transmission of fiefs to collateral and female heirs took place very slowly among the Germans. There is extant a charter, A.D. 1201, conveying the right of succession to females ; but it is granted as an extraordinaiy mark of favour and in reward of uncommon services. (Boehmer., ibid. p. 365.) In Germany, as well as in France and Italy, a considerable part of the lands continued to be allodial long after the feudal mode of tenure was intro- duced. It appears from the Codex Diplomaticus Monasterii Buch that a great part of the lands in the marquisate of Misnia was still allodial as late as the thirteenth century. (Nos. 31, 36, 37, 46, etc., ap. Scriptores Hist. German., cura Schoetgenii et Kreysigii, Altenb., 1755, vol. ii. p. 183, etc.) Allodial property seems to have been common in another district of the same province during the same period. Reliquiae Diplo maticae SanctimoniaL, Beutiz., Nos. 17, 36, 58, ibid. 374, etc. NOTE IX. Sect I. p. 17. As I shall have occasion, in another note, to represent the condition of that part of the people who dwelt in cities, I will confine myself in this to consider the state of the inhabitants of the country. The persons employed in cultivating the ground during the ages under review may be divided into three classes : 1. Servi, or slaves. This seems to have been the most numerous class, and consisted either of captives taken in war, or of persons the property in whom was acquired in some one of the various methods enumerated by Du Cange, voc. Servus, vol. vi. p. 447. The wretched condition of this numerous race of men will appear from several circumstances. 1. Their masters had absolute dominion over their persons. They had the power of punishing their slaves capitally, with- out the intervention of any judge. This dangerous right they possessed not only in the more early periods when their manners were fierce, but it continued as late as the twelfth century. (Joach. Potgiesserus de Statu Servorum, Lemgov., 1736, 4to, lib. ii. cap. 1, 4, 10, 13, 24.) Even after this jurisdiction of masters came to be restrained, the life of a slave was deemed to be of so little value that a very slight compensa- tion atoned for taking it away. (Idem. lib. iii c. 6.) If masters had power over the lives of their slaves, it is evident that almost no bounds would be set to the rigour of the punishments which they might in- flict upon them. The codes of ancient laws prescribed punishments for the crimes of slaves different from those which were inflicted on freemen. The latter paid only a fine or compensation ; the former were subjected to corporal punishments. The cruelty of these was, in many instances, excessive. Slaves might be put to the rack on very slight occasions. The laws with respect to these points are to be found in Potgiesserus, lib. iii. c. 7, 2, and are shocking to humanity. 2. If the dominion of masters over the lives and persons of their slaves was thus extensive, it was no less BO over their actions and property. They were not originally permitted to marry. Male and female slaves were allowod and even encouraged, to cohabit together. But this union was NOTE ix.] PROOFS AND ILLUSTEATIONS. 201 not considered as a marriage : it was called contubernium, not nuptiat <*i matrimonium. (Potgiess., lib. iL c. 2, 1.) This notion was so much established that, during several centuries after the barbarous nations embraced the Christian religion, slaves who lived as husband and wife were not joined together by any religious ceremony, and did not receive the nuptial benediction from a priest. (Ibid., 10, 11.) When this con- junction between slaves came to be considered as a lawful marriage, they were not permitted to marry without the consent of their master, and such as ventured to do so without obtaining that were punished with great severity, and sometimes were put to death. (Potgiess., ibid., 12, etc. ; Gregor. Turon., Hist, lib. v. c. 3.) When the manners of the European nations became more gentle, and their ideas more liberal, slaves who married without their master's consent were subjected only to a fine. (Potgiess., ibid., 20 ; Du Cange, Gloss, voc. Forismaritagium.) 3. All the chil- dren of slaves were in the same condition with their parents, and became the property of the master. (Du Cange, Gloss., voc. Servus, vol. vi. p. 450 ; Murat., Antiq. ItaL, vol. L p. 766.) 4. Slaves were so entirely the pro- perty of their masters that they could sell them at pleasure. While domestic slavery continued, property in a slave was sold in the same manner with that which a person had in any other movable. Afterwards slaves became adscripti glebce, and were conveyed by sale together with the farm or estate to which they belonged. Potgiesserus has collected the laws and charters which illustrate this well-known circumstance in the condition of slaves. (Lib. ii. c. 4.) 5. Slaves had a title to nothing but subsistence and clothes from their master ; all the profits of their labour accrued to him. If a master, from indulgence, gave his slaves any peculium, or fixed allowance for their subsistence, they had no right of property in what they saved out of that. All that they accumulated be- longed to their master. (Potgiess., lib. ii. c. 10 ; Murat., Antiq. ItaL, vol. i. p. 768; Du Cange, voc. Servus, vol. vi. p. 451.) Conformably to the same principle, all the effects of slaves belonged to their masters at their death, and they could not dispose of them by testament. (Potgiess., lib. ii. c. 11.) 6. Slaves were distinguished from freemen by a peculiar dress. Among all the barbarous nations, long hair was a mark of dignity and of free- dom ; slaves were, for that reason, obliged to shave their heads ; and by this distinction, how indifferent soever it may be in its own nature, they were reminded every moment of the inferiority of their condition. (Potgiess., lib. iii c. 4.) For the same reason, it was enacted in the laws of almost all the nations of Europe that no slave should be admitted to give evidence against a freeman in a court of justice. Du Cange, voc. Servus, vol. vi p. 451 ; Potgiess., lib. iii. c. 3. II. Villani. They were likewise adscripti glebce or villas, from which they derived their name, and were transferable along with it (Du Cange, voc. Villanus.) But in this they differed from slaves, that they paid a fixed rent to their mastei for the land which they cultivated, and, after paying that, all the fruits of their labour and industry belonged to them- selves in property. This distinction is marked by Pierre de Fontain's Conseil. Vie de St. Louis, par Joinville, p. 119, 6dit. de Du Cange. Several cases decided agreeably to this principle are mentioned by Murat, ibid., p. 773. 202 PKOOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE ix. III. The last class of persons employed in agriculture were freemen. These are distinguished by various names among the writers of the Middle Ages, arimanni, conditionales, originarii, tributales, etc. These seem to have been persons who possessed some small allodial property of their own. and, besides that, cultivated some farm belonging to their more wealthy neighbours, for which they paid a fixed rent, and bound themselves like- wise to perform several small services in prato ml in messe, in aratura vd in vinea, such as ploughing a certain quantity of their landlord's ground, assisting him in harvest and vintage work, etc. The clearest proof of this may be found in Muratori, vol. i. p. 712, and in Du Cange, under the respective words above mentioned. I have not been able to discover whether these arimanni, etc., were removable at pleasure, or held their farms by lease for a certain number of years. The former, if we may judge from the genius and maxims of the age, seems to be the most probable. These persons, however, were considered as freemen in the most honourable sense of the word : they enjoyed all the privileges of that condition, and were even called to serve in war ; an honour to which no slave was admitted. (Murat., Antiq., vol. i. p. 743, vol. ii. p. 446). This account of the condition of these three different classes of persons will enable the reader to apprehend the full force of an argument which I shall produce in confirmation of what I have said in the text concerning the wretched state of the people during the Middle Ages. Notwithstanding the immense difference between the first of these classes and the third, such was the spirit of tyranny which prevailed among the great proprietors of lands, and so various their opportunities of oppressing those who were settled on their estates, and of rendering their condition intolerable, that many freemen, in despair, renounced their liberty and voluntarily surren- dered themselves as slaves to their powerful masters. This they did in order that their masters might become more immediately interested to afford them protection, together with the means of subsisting themselves and their families. The forms of such a surrender, or obnoxiatio, as it was then called, are preserved by Marculfus, lib. ii. c. 28, and by the anony- mous author published by M. Bignon together with the collection of formulae compiled by Marculfus, c. 16. In both, the reason given for the obnoxiatio is the wretched and indigent condition of the person who gives up his liberty. It was still more common for freemen to surrender their liberty to bishops or abbots, that they might partake of the security which the vassals and slaves of churches and monasteries enjoyed, in consequence of the superstitious veneration paid to the saint under whose immediate protection they were supposed to be taken. (Du Cange, voc. Oblatus, vol. iv. p. 1286.) That condition must have been miserable indeed which could induce a freeman voluntarily to renounce his liberty and to give up himself as a slave to the disposal of another. The number of slaves in every nation of Europe was immense. The greater part of the inferior class of people in France were reduced to this state at the com- mencement of the third race of kings. (L'Esprit des Loix, liv. xxx. c. 11.) The same was the case in England. (Brady, Pref. to Gen. Hist.) Manj> curious facts with respect to the ancient state of villains or slaves in England are published in Observations on the Statutes, chiefly the more ancient, 3d edit., p. 269, etc. NOTE x.j PEOOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 203 NOTE X. Sect. I. p. 19. Innumerable proofs of this might be produced. Many charters, granted by persons of the highest rank, are preserved, from which it appears that they could not subscribe their name. It was usual for persons who could not write to make the sign of the cross in confirmation of a charter. Several of these remain where kings and persons of great eminence affix signum crucis manu propria pro ignoratione literarum. (Du Cange, voc. Crux, vol. iii. p. 1191.) From this is derived the phrase of signing instead of subscribing a paper. In the ninth century, Herbaud, Comes Palatii, though supreme judge of the empire by virtue of his office, could not subscribe his name. (Nouveau Traitd de Diplomatique, par deux Bene'dictins, 4to, torn. ii. p. 422.) As late as the fourteenth century, Du Guesclin, constable of France, the greatest man in the state, and one of the greatest men of his age, could neither read nor write. (Ste. Palaye, Mdmoires sur 1'ancienne Chevalerie, tit. ii. p. 82.) Nor was this igno- rance confined to laymen : the greater part of the clergy was not many degrees superior to them in science. Many dignified ecclesiastics could not subscribe the canons of those councils in which they sat as members. (Nouv. Traite de Diplom., torn. ii. p. 424.) One of the questions appointed by the canons to be put to persons who were candidates for orders was this : " Whether they could read the Gospels and Epistles, and explain the sense of them, at least literally ? " (Regino Prumiensis, ap. Bruck., Hist. Philos., v. iii. p. 631.) Alfred the Great complained that from the Humber to the Thames there was not a priest who understood the liturgy in his mother-tongue or who could translate the easiest piece of Latin, and that from the Thames to the sea the ecclesiastics were still more ignorant. (Asserus de Rebus gestis Alfredi, ap. Camdeni Anglica, etc., p. 25.) The ignorance of the clergy is quaintly described by an author of the Dark Ages : " Potius dediti guise quam glossse ; potius colligunt libras quam legunt libros ; libentivis intuentur Martham quam Marcum ; malunt legere in Salmone quam in Solomone." (Alanus de Art. Predicat., ap. Lebeuf, Dissert, torn. ii. p. 21.) To the obvious causes of such universal igno- rance, arising from the state of government and manners, from the seventh to the eleventh century, we may add the scarcity of books during that period, and the difficulty of rendering them more common. The Romans wrote their books either on parchment or on paper made of the Egyptian papyrus. The latter, being the cheapest, was of course the most commonly used. But after the Saracens conquered Egypt, in the seventh century, the communication between that country and the people settled in Italy or in other parts of Europe was almost entirely broken off, and the papyrus was no longer in use among them. They were obliged, on that account, to write all their books upon parchment, and, as the price of that was high, books became extremely rare and of great value. We may judge of the scarcity of the materials for writing them from one circumstance. There still remain several manuscripts of the eighth, ninth, and following cen- turies, written on parchment from which some former writing had been erased in order to substitute a new composition in its place. In this manner it is probable that several works of the ancients perished. A book of Livy or of Tacitus might be erased to make room for the legendary tale PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. NOTE xi. of a saint OT the superstitious prayers of a missaL (Mural, Autiq. ItaL, vol. iii. p. 833.) P. de Montfaucon affirms that the greater part of the manuscripts on parchment which he has seen, those of an ancient date excepted, are written on parchment from which some former treatise had been erased. (Mdm. de 1'Acad. des Inscript, torn. ix. p. 325.) As the want of materials for writing is one reason why so many of the works of the ancients have perished, it accounts likewise for the small number of manuscripts of any kind previous to the eleventh century, when they began to multiply, from a cause which shall be mentioned. (Hist, litter, de France, torn. vi p. 6.) Many circumstances prove the scarcity of books during these ages. Private persons seldom possessed any books whatever. Even monasteries of considerable note had only one missal. (Murat, Antiq., voL ix. p. 789.) Lupus, abbot of Ferrieres, in a letter to the pope, A.D. 855, beseeches him to lend him a copy of Cicero de Oratore and Quintilian's Institutions ; " for," says he, "although we have parts of those books, there is no complete copy of them in all France." (Murat, Antiq., voL iii p. 835.) The price of books became so high that persons of a moderate fortune could not afford to purchase them. The countess of Anjou paid for a copy of the Homilies of Haimon, bishop of Halber- stadt, two hundred sheep, five quarters of wheat, and the same quantity of rye and millet. (Histoire litte'raire de France, par des Eeligieux Be'ne'- dictins, torn, vii p. 3.) Even so late as the year 1471, when Louis XI. borrowed the works of Rasis, the Arabian physician, from the faculty of medicine in Paris, he not only deposited in pledge a considerable quantity of plate, but was obliged to procure a nobleman to join with him as surety in a deed, binding himself, under a great forfeiture, to restore it. (Gabv. Naudd Addit. a. 1'Histoire de Louys XI. par Comines, edit de Fresnoy, torn. iv. p. 281.) Many curious circumstances with respect to the extrava- gant price of books in the Middle Ages are collected by that industrious compiler, to whom I refer such of my readers as deem this small branch of literary history an object of curiosity. When any person made a present of a book to a church or monastery, in which were the only libra- ries during several ages, it was deemed a donative of such value that he offered it on the altar pro remedio animce SUCK, in order to obtain the forgive- ness of his sins. (Murat., voL iii p. 836 ; Hist, litter, de France, torn. vi p. 6 ; Nouv. Trait de Diplomat, par deux Be'nedictins, 4to, torn, i p. 481.) In the eleventh century the art of making paper, in the manner now become universal, was invented ; by means of that, not only the number of manuscripts increased, but the study of the sciences was won- derfully facilitated. (Murat, ib. p. 871.) The invention of the art of making paper, and the invention of the art of printing, are two consider- able events in literary history. It is remarkable that the former preceded the first dawning of letters and improvement in knowledge towards the close of the eleventh century ; the latter ushered in the light which spread over Europe at the era of the Reformation. NOTE XL Sect L p. 20. All the religious maxims and practices of the Dark Ages are a proof of this. I shall produce one remarkable testimony in confirmation of it. NOTE xii.] PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 205 from an author canonised by the Church of Rome, St Eloy, or Egidius, bishop of Noyon, in the seventh century. " He is a good Christian who comes frequently to church ; who presents the oblation which is offered to God upon the altar ; who doth not taste the fruits of his own industry until he has consecrated a part of them to God ; who, when the holy festi- vals approach, lives chastely even with his own wife during several clays, that with a safe conscience he may draw near the altar of God ; and who, in the lust place, can repeat the Creed and the Lord's Prayer. Redeem then your souls from destruction while you have the means in your power : offer presents and tithes to churchmen ; come more frequently to church ; humbly implore the patronage of the saints ; for, if you observe these things, you may come with security in the day of retribution to the tribunal of the Eternal Judge, and say, ' Give to us, Lord, for we have given unto thee.' " (Dacherii Spicilegium Vet Script, vol. ii. p. 94.) The learned and judicious translator of Dr. Mosheim's Ecclesiastical History, to one of whose additional notes I am indebted for my knowledge of this passage, subjoins a very proper reflection : " We see here a large and ample description of a good Christian, in which there is not the least mention of the love of God, resignation to his will, obedience to his laws, or of justice, benevolence, and charity towards men." Mosh. Eccles. Hist, vol. i. p. 324. NOTE XII. Sect I. p. 20. That infallibility in all its determinations, to which the Church of Rome pretends, has been attended with one unhappy consequence. As it is impossible to relinquish any opinion or to alter any practice which has been established by authority that cannot err, all its institutions and cere- monies must be immutable and everlasting, and the Church must continue to observe in enlightened times those rites which were introduced during the ages of darkness and credulity. What delighted and edified the latter must disgust and shock the former. Many of the rites observed in the Romish Church appear manifestly to have been introduced by a supersti- tion of the lowest and most illiberal species. Many of them were bor- rowed, with little variation, from the religious ceremonies established among the ancient heathens. Some were so ridiculous that, if every age did not furnish instances of the fascinating influence of superstition, as well as of the whimsical forms which it assumes, it must appear incredible that they should have been ever received or tolerated. In several churches of France they celebrated a festival in commemoration of the Virgin Mary's Flight into Egypt It was called the Feast of the Asa. A young girl, richly dressed, with a child in her arms, was set upon an ass superbly caparisoned. The ass was led to the altar in solemn procession. High mass was said with great pomp. The ass was taught to kneel at proper places ; a hymn no less childish than impious was sung in his praise ; and, when the ceremony was ended, the priest, instead of the usual words with which he dismissed the people, brayed three times like an ass, and the people, instead of the usual response, " We bless the Lord," brayed three times in the same manner. (Du Cange, voc. Festum, voL iii p. 424.) This ridiculous ceremony was not, like the festival of fools, and some other pageants of those ages, a mere farcical entertainment exhibited in a church. PROOFS AND ILLUSTEATIONS. [NOTE xni. and mingled, as was then the custom, with an imitation of some religious rites : it was an act of devotion, performed by the ministers of religion and by the authority of the Church. However, as this practice did not prevail universally in the Catholic Church, its absurdity contributed at last to abolish it. NOTE XIII. Sect. I. p. 25. As there is no event in the history of mankind more singular than that of the crusades, every circumstance that tends to explain or to give any rational account of this extraordinary frenzy of the human mind is inter- esting. I have asserted in the text that the minds of men were prepared gradually for the amazing effort which they made in consequence of the exhortations of Peter the Hermit, by several occurrences previous to his time. A more particular detail of this curious and obscure part of history may perhaps appear to some of my readers to be of importance. That the end of the world was expected about the close of the tenth and beginning of the eleventh century, and that this occasioned a general alarm, is evident from the authors to whom I have referred in the text. This belief was so universal and so strong that it mingled itself with civil transactions. Many charters in the latter part of the tenth century begin in this manner : " Appropinquante mundi termino," etc. As the end of the world is now at hand, and by various calamities and judgments the signs of its approach are now manifest. (Hist, de Langued., par D. D. de Vic et Vaisette, torn, ii. ; Preuves, pp. 86, 89, 90, 117, 158, etc.). One effect of this opinion was that a great number of pilgrims resorted to Jerusalem, with a resolu- tion to die there, or to wait the coming of the Lord ; kings, earls, mar- quises, bishops, and even a great number of women, besides persons of an inferior rank, flocked to the Holy Land. (Glaber. Rodulph., Hist., apud Bouquet, Recueil, torn. x. pp. 50, 52.) Another historian mentions a vast cavalcade of pilgrims who accompanied the count of Angouleme to Jeru- salem in the year 1026. (Chronic. Ademari, ibid., p. 162.) Upon their return, these pilgrims filled Europe with lamentable accounts of the state of Christians in the Holy Land. (Willerm. Tyr., Hist, ap. Gest. Dei per Franc, vol. ii p. 636 ; Guibert. Abbat., Hist., ibid., vol. i. p. 476.) Besides this, it was usual for many of the Christian inhabitants of Jeru- salem, as well as of other cities in tlie East, to travel as mendicants through Europe, and, by describing the wretched condition of the professors of the Christian faith under the dominion of infidels, to extort charity, and to excite zealous persons to make some attempt in order to deliver them from oppression. (Baldrici Archiepiscopi Histor., ap. Gesta Dei, etc., vol. i. p. 86.) In the year 986, Gerbert, archbishop of Ravenna, afterwards Pope Silvester IT., addressed a letter to all Christians in the name of the church of Jerusalem. It is eloquent and pathetic, and contains a formal exhorta- tion to take arms against the pagan oppressors in order to rescue the holy city from their yoke. (Gerberti Epistola3, ap. Bouquet, Recueil, torn. x. p. 426.) In consequence of this spirited call, some subjects of the republic of Pisa equipped a fleet and invaded the territories of the Mahometans in Syria. (Murat, Script. Rer. Italic., vol. iii. p. 400.) The alarm was taken in the East, and an opinion prevailed, A.D. 1010, that all the forces of Christendom were to unite in order to drive the Mahometans out of xiii.] PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 207 Palestine. (Chron. Ademari, ap. Bouquet, torn. x. p. 152.) It is evident from all these particulars that the ideas which led the crusaders to under- take their wild enterprise did not arise, according to the description of many authors, from a sudden fit of frantic enthusiasm, but were gradually formed ; so that the universal concourse to the standard of the cross, when erected by Urban II., will appear less surprising. If the various circumstances which I have enumerated ra this note, as well as in the history, are sufficient to account for the ardour with which such vast numbers engaged in such a dangerous undertaking, the extensive privileges and immunities granted to the persons who assumed the cross serve to account for the long continuance of this spirit in Europe. 1. They were exempted from prosecutions on account of debt during the time of their being engaged in this holy service. (Du Cange, voc. Grucis Privile- gium, vol. ii. p. 1194.) 2. They were exempted from paying interest for the money which they had borrowed in order to fit them for this sacred warfare. (Ibid.) 3. They were exempted either entirely, or at least during a certain time, from the payment of taxes. (Ibid. ; Ordonnances des Rois de France, torn. i p. 33.) 4. They might alienate their lands without the consent of the superior lord of whom they held. (Ibid.) 5. Their persons and effects were taken under the protection of St. Peter, and the anathemas of the Church were denounced against all who should molest them, or carry on any quarrel or hostility against them, during their absence on account of the holy war. (Du Cange, ibid. ; Guibertus Abbas, ap. Bongars., vol. i pp. 480, 482.) 6. They enjoyed all the privileges of ecclesiastics, and were not bound to plead in any civil court, but were declared subject to the spiritual jurisdiction alone. (Du Cange, ibid. ; Ordon. des Rois, torn, i pp. 34, i 7 4.) 7. They obtained a plenary remission of all their sins, and the gates of heaven were set open to them, without requiring any other proof of their penitence but their engaging in this expedition ; and thus by gratifying their favourite passion, the love of war, they secured to themselves immunities which were not usually obtained but by paying large sums of money or by undergoing painful penances. (Guibertus Abbas, p. 480.) When we behold the civil and ecclesiastical powers vying with each, other and straining their invention in order to devise expedients for encouraging and adding strength to the spirit of superstition, can we be surprised that it should become so general as to render it infamous, and a mark of cowardice, to decline engaging in the holy war? (Willerm, Tyriensis, ap. Bongars., voL ii p. 641.) The histories of the crusades written by modern authors, who are apt to substi- tute the ideas and maxims of their own age in the place of those which influenced the persons whose actions they attempt to relate, convey a very imperfect notion of the spirit at that time predominant in Europe. The original historians, who were animated themselves with the same passions which possessed their contemporaries, exhibit to us a more striking picture of the times and manners which they describe. The enthusiastic rapture with which they account for the effects of the pope's discourse in (lie Council of Clermont, the exultation with which they mention the numbers who devoted themselves to this holy warfare, the confidence with -which they express their reliance on the divine protection, the ecstacy of joy with which they describe their taking possession of the holy city, will enable 208 PKOOES AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE xm. us to conceive in some degree the extravagance of that zeal which agitated the minds of men with such violence, and will suggest as many singular reflections to a philosopher as any occurrence in the history of mankind, It is unnecessary to select the particular passages in the several historians which confirm this observation. But, lest those authors may be suspected of adorning their narrative with any exaggerated description, I shall appeal to one of the leaders who conducted the enterprise. There is extant a letter from Stephen, the earl of Chartres and Blois, to Adela, his wife, in which he gives her an account of the progress of the crusaders. He describes the crusaders as the chosen army of Christ, as the servants and soldiers of God, as men who marched under the immediate protection of the Almighty, being conducted by his hand to victory and conquest. He speaks of the Turks as accursed, sacrilegious, and devoted by Heaven to destruction ; and when he mentions the soldiers in the Christian army who had died or were killed, he is confident that their souls were admitted directly into the joys of Paradise. Dacherii Spicilegium, vol. iv. p. 257. The expense of conducting numerous bodies of men from Europe to Asia must have been excessive, and the difficulty of raising the necessary sums must have been proportionally great, during ages when the public revenues in every nation of Europe were extremely small. Some account is preserved of the expedients employed by Humbert II., Dauphin of Vienne, in order to levy the money requisite towards ecpaipping him for the crusade, A.D. 1346. These I shall mention, as they tend to show the considerable influence which the crusades had both on the state of property and of civil government. 1. He exposed to sale part of his domains; and, as the price was destined for such a sacred service, he obtained the consent of the French king, of whom these lands were held, ratifying the alienation. (Hist, de Dauphine", torn. i. pp. 332, 335.) 2. He issued a proclamation in which he promised to grant new privileges to the nobles, as well as new immunities to the cities and towns in his territories, in consideration of certain sums which they were instantly to pay on that account. (Ibid., torn. ii. p. 512.) Many of the charters of community, which I shall mention in another note, were obtained in this manner. 3. He exacted a contribution towards defraying the charges of the expe- dition from all his subjects, whether ecclesiastics or laymen, who did not accompany him in person to the East. (Ibid., torn. i. p. 335.) 4. He appropriated a considerable part of his usual revenues for the support of the troops to be employed in this service. (Ibid., torn. ii. p. 518.) 5. He exacted considerable sums, not only of the Jews settled in his dominions, but also of the Lombards and other bankers who had fixed their residence there. (Ibid., torn. i. p. 338, torn. ii. p. 528.) Notwith- standing the variety of these resources, the dauphin was involved in such expense by this expedition that on his return he was obliged to make new demands on his subjects and to pillage the Jews by fresh exactions. (Ibid , torn. i. pp. 344, 347.) When the count de Foix engaged in the first crusade, he raised the money necessary for defraying the expenses of that expedition by alienating part of his territories. (Hist, de Langued., pat D. D. de Vic et Vaisette, torn. ii. p. 287.) In like manner Baldwin, count of Hainault, mortgaged or sold a considerable portion of his dominions to khe bishop of Liege, A.D. 1096. (Du Mont, Corps Diplomatique, torn, i: KOTE xiv.] PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 2u9 p. 59.) At a later period, Baldwin, count of Namur, sold part of his* estate to a monastery, when he intended to assume the cross, A.D. 1239. Miraei Oper., L p. 313. NOTE XIV. Sect L p. 29. The usual method of forming an opinion concerning the comparative state of manners in two different nations is by attending to the facts which historians relate concerning each of them. Various passages might be selected from the Byzantine historians, describing the splendour and mag- nificence of the Greek empire. P. de Montfaucon has produced from the writings of St. Chrysostom a very full account of the elegance and luxury of the Greeks in his age. That father, in his sermons, enters into such minute details concerning the manners and customs of his contemporaries as appear strange in discourses from the pulpit. P. de Montfaucon has collected these descriptions and ranged them under different heads. The court of the more early Greek emperors seems to have resembled those of Eastern monarchs, both in magnificence and in corruption of manners. The emperors in the eleventh century, though inferior in power, did not yield to them in ostentation and splendour. (Me'moires de 1'Acad. dea Inscript., torn. xx. p. 197.) But we may decide concerning the compara- tive state of manners in the Eastern empire, and among the nations in the West of Europe, by another method, which if not more certain is at least more striking. As Constantinople was the place of rendezvous for all the armies of the crusaders, this brought together the people of the East and West as to one great interview. There are extant several contemporary authors, both awiong the Greeks and Latins, who were witnesses of this singular congress of people- formerly strangers in a great measure to each other. They describe with simplicity and candour the impression which that new spectacle made upon their own minds. This may be considered as the most lively and just picture of the real character and manners of each people. When the Greeks speak of the Franks, they describe them as barbarians, fierce, illiterate, impetuous, and savage. They assume a f^ne of superiority, as a more polished people, acquainted with the arts L. b of government and of elegance, of which the other was ignorant. It is thus Anna Comnena describes the manners of the Latins. (Alexias, pp. 224, 231, 237, ap. Byz. Script., vol. ix.) She always views them with contempt as a rude people, the very mention of whose names was sufficient to contaminate the beauty and elegance of history (p. 229). Nicetas Choniatas inveighs against them with still more violence, and gives an account of their ferocity and devastations in terms not unlike those which preceding historians had employed in describing the incursions of the Goths and Vandals. (Nicet. Chon., ap. Byz. Script., vol. iii. p. 302, etc.) But, on the other hand, the Latin historians were struck with astonishment at the magnificence, wealth, and elegance which they discovered in the Eastern empire. " Oh, what a vast city is Constanti- nople ! " exclaims Fulcherius Carnotensis when he first beheld it, " and how beautiful ! How many monasteries are there in it, and how many palaces built with wonderful art ! How many manufactures are there in the city amazing to behold ! It would be astonishing to relate how it abounds with all good things, with gold, silver, and stuffs of varion' VOL. i. f 210 PEOOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE xv. kinds ; for every hour ships arrive in its port laden with all things neces- sary for the use of man." (Fulcher., ap. Bongars., vol. i. p. 386.) Willermus, archbishop of Tyre, the most intelligent historian of the Crusades, seems to be fond, on every occasion, of describing the elegance and splendour of the court of Constantinople, and adds that what he and his countrymen observed there exceedetl any idea which they could have formed of it, " nostrarum enim rerum modum et dignitatem excedunt." (Willerm. Tyr., ap. Bong., vol. ii. pp. 657, 664.) Benjamin the Jew, of Tudela in Navarre, who began his travels A.D. 1173, appears to have been equally astonished at the magnificence of that city, and gives a description of its splendour in terms of high admiration. (Benj. TudeL, ap. Les Voyages faits dans les 12 e , 13*", etc. Siecles, par Bergeron, p. 10, etc.) Guntherus, a French monk, who wrote a history of the conquest of Con- stantinople by the crusaders in the thirteenth century, speaks of the magnificence of that city in the same tone of admiration : " Structuram autem sedificiorum in corpore civitatis, in ecclesiis videlicet, et turribus, et in domibus magnatorum, vix ullus vel describere potest, vel credere describenti, nisi qui ea oculata fide cognoverit." (Hist. Constantinop., ap. Canisii Lectiones Antiquas, fol., Antw., 1725, vol. iv. p. 14.) Geoffrey de Villehardouin, a nobleman of high rank, and accustomed to all the magnificence then known in the West, describes in similar terms the astonishment and admiration of such of his fellow-soldiers as beheld Con- stantinople for the first time. " They could not have believed," says he, " that there was a city so beautiful and so rich in the whole world. When they viewed its high walls, its lofty towers, its rich palaces, its superb churches, all appeared so great that they could have formed no conception of this sovereign city unless they had seen it with their own eyes." (Histoire de la Conquete de Constantinople, p. 49.) From these undis- guised representations of their own feelings it is evident that to the Greeks the crusaders appeared to be a race of rude, unpolished barbarians ; whereas the latter, how much soever they might contemn the unwarlike character of the former, could not help regarding them as far superior to themselves in elegance and arts. That the state of government and manners was much more improved in Italy than in the other countries of Europe is evident not only from the facts recorded in history, but it appears that the more intelligent leaders of the crusaders were struck with the differ- ence. Jacobus de Vitriaco, a French historian of the holy war, makes an elaborate panegyric on the character and manners of the Italians. He views them as a more polished people, and particularly celebrates them for their love of liberty, and civil wisdom : "In consiliis circumspecti, in re suA publica procurand diligentes et studiosi ; sibi in posterum provi- dentes ; aliis subjici renuentes ; ante omnia libertatem sibi defendentes ; sub uno quern eligunt capitaneo, communitati suse jura et instituta die-- tan tes et similiter observantes." Histor. Hierosol., ap. Gesta Dei pet Francos, voL ii. p. 1085. NOTE XV. Sect. I. p. 32. The different steps taken by the cities of Italy in order to extend their power and dominions are remarkable. As soon as their liberties were established and they began to feel their own importance, they endeavoured NOTE xv.] PfiOOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 211 to render themselves masters of the territory round their walls. Under the Romans, when cities enjoyed municipal privileges and jurisdiction, the circumjacent lands belonged to each town and were the property of the community. But, as it was not the genius of the feudal policy to encourage cities or to show any regard for their possessions and immunities, these lands had been seized and shared among the conquerors. The barons to whom they were granted erected their castles almost at the gates of the city, and exercised their jurisdiction there. Under pretence of recovering their ancient property, many of the cities in Italy attacked these trouble- some neighbours, and, dispossessing them, annexed their territories to the communities, and made thereby a considerable addition to their power. Several instances of this occur in the eleventh and beginning of the twelfth centuries. (Murat., Antiq. ItaL, voL iv. p. 159, etc.) Their ambition increasing together with their power, the cities afterwards attacked several barons situated at a greater distance from their walls, and obliged them to engage that they would become members of their community ; that they would take the oath of fidelity to their magistrates ; that they would subject their lands to all burdens and taxes imposed by common consent ; that they would defend the community against all its enemies ; and that they would reside within the city during a certain specified time in each year. (Murat., ibid., p. 163.) This subjection of the nobility to the municipal government established in cities became almost universal, and was often extremely grievous to persons accustomed to consider them- selves as independent Otto Frisingensis thus describes the state of Italy under Frederic I. : " The cities so much affect liberty, and are so solicitous to avoid the insolence of power, that almost all of them have thrown off every other authority and are governed by their own magistrates. Inso- much that all that country is now filled with free cities, most of which have compelled their bishops to reside within their walls, and there is scarcely any nobleman, how great soever his power may be, who is not subject to the laws and government of some city." (De Gestis Frider. I. Imp., lib. ii. c. 13, p. 453.) In another place he observes of the marquis of Montferrat that he was almost the only Italian baron who had preserved his independence and had not become subject to the laws of any city. (See also Muratori, Antichita Estensi, voL i. pp. 411, 412.) That state into which some of the nobles were compelled to enter, others embraced from choice. They observed the high degree of security, as well as of credit and estimation, which the growing wealth and dominion of the great com- munities procured to all the members of them. They were desirous to partake of these and to put themselves under such powerful protection. With this view they voluntarily became citizens of the towns to which their lands were most contiguous, and, abandoning their ancient castles, took up their residence in the cities, at least during part of the year. Several deeds are still extant by which some of the most illustrious families in Italy are associated as citizens of different cities. (Murat., ibid., p. 165, etc.) A charter by which Atto de Macerata is admitted as a citizen of Osima, A.D. 1198, in the March a di Ancona, is still extant. In this he stipulates that he will acknowledge himself to be a burgess of that community ; that he will to the utmost of his power promote its honour and welfare ; that he will obev its magistrates ; that he will i- 2 212 PEOOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE xv. enter into no league with its enemies ; that he will reside in the town during two months in every year, or for a longer time, if required by the magistrates. The community, on the other hand, take him, his family, and Mends, under their protection, and engage to defend him against every enemy. (Fr. Ant. Zacharias, Anecdota Medii Mvi, Aug. Taur., 1755, t'ol., p. 66.) This privilege was deemed so important that not only lay- men, hut ecclesiastics of the highest rank, condescended to be adopted as members of the great communities, in hopes of enjoying the safety and dignity which that condition conferred. (Murat., ibid., p. 179.) Before the institution of communities, persons of noble birth had no other residence but their castles. They kept their petty courts there ; and the cities were deserted, having hardly any inhabitants but slaves or persons of low con- dition. But, in consequence of the practice which I have mentioned, cities not only became more populous, but were filled with inhabitants of better rank, and a custom which still subsists in Italy was then introduced, that all families of distinction reside more constantly in the great towns than is usual in other parts of Europe. As cities acquired new considera- tion and dignity by the accession of such citizens, they became more solicitous to preserve their liberty and independence. The emperors, as sovereigns, had anciently a palace in almost every great city of Italy : when they visited that country, they were accustomed to reside in these palaces, and the troops which accompanied them were quartered in the houses of the citizens. This the citizens deemed both ignominious and dangerous. They could not help considering it as receiving a master and an enemy within their walls. They laboured, therefore, to get free of this subjection. Some cities prevailed on the emperors to engage that they would never enter their gates but take up their residence without the walls. (Chart. Hen. IV., Murat., ibid., p. 24.) Others obtained the im- perial license to pull down the palace situated within their liberties, on condition that they built another in the suburbs for the occasional re- ception of the emperor. (Chart. Hen. IV., Murat., ibid., p. 25.) These various encroachments of the Italian cities alarmed the emperors, and put them on schemes for re-establishing the imperial jurisdiction over them on its ancient footing. Frederic Barbarossa engaged in this enterprise with great ardour. The free cities of Italy joined together in a general league, and stood on their defence ; and after a long contest, carried on with alternate success, a solemn treaty of peace was concluded at Con- stance, A.D. 1183, by which all the privileges and immunities granted by former emperors to the principal cities in Italy were confirmed and rati- fied. (Murat., Dissert. XLVIII.) This treaty of Constance was considered as such an important article in the jurisprudence of the Middle Ages that it is usually published together with the Libri Feudorum at the end of the Corpus Juris Civilis. The treaty secured privileges of great importance to the confederate cities, and though it reserved a considerable degree of authority and jurisdiction to the empire, yet the cities persevered with such vigour in their efforts in order to extend their immunities, and the con- junctures in which they made them were so favourable, that before the conclusion of the thirteenth century most of the great cities in Italy had shaken off all marks of subjection to the empire and were become inde- pendent sovereign republics. It is not requisite that I should trace the NOTE xvi.] PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 213 various steps by which they advanced to this high degree of power, so fatal to the empire and so beneficial to the cause of liberty in Italy. Muratori, with his usual industry, has collected many original papers which illus- trate this curious and little known part of history. Murat., Autiq. ItaL, Dissert. L. See also Jo. Bapt. Villanovaa Hist. Laudis Pompeii sive Lodi, in Grsev. Thes. Antiquit. ItaL, vol. iii. p. 888. NOTE XVI. Sect. I. p. 33. Long before the institution of communities in France, charters of im- munity or franchise were granted to some towns and villages by the lords on whom they depended. But these are very different from such as be- came common in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries. They did not erect these towns into corporations ; they did not establish a municipal government ; they did not grant them the privilege of bearing aims. They contained nothing more than a manumission of the inhabitants from the yoke of servitude ; an exemption from certain services which were oppressive and ignominious ; and the establishment of a fixed tax or rent which the citizens were to pay to their lord in place of impositions which he could formerly lay upon them at pleasure. Two charters of this kind to two villages in the county of Roussillon, one in A.D. 974, the other in A.D. 1025, are still extant. (Petr. de Marca, Marca, sive- Limes His- panicus, App., pp. 909, 1038.) Such concessions, it is probable, were not unknown in other parts of Europe, and may be considered as a step towards the more extensive privileges conferred by Louis le Gros on the towns within his domains. The communities in France never aspired to the same independence with those in Italy. They acquired new privileges and immunities, but the right of sovereignty remained entire to the king or baron within whose territories the respective cities were situated and from whom they received the charter of their freedom. A great number of these charters, granted both by the kings of France and by their great vassals, are published by M. d'Achery in his Spicilegium, and many are found in the collection of the Ordonnances des Rois de France. These convey a very striking representation of the wretched condition of cities previous to the institution of communities, when they were subject to the judges appointed by the superior lords of whom they held, and who had scarcely any other law but their will. Each concession in these charters must be considered as a grant of some new privileges which the people did not formerly enjoy, and each regulation as a method of redressing some grievance under which the inhabitants of cities formerly laboured. The charters of communities contain likewise the first expedients employed for the introduction of equal laws and regular government. On both these accounts they merit particular attention, and therefore, instead of referring my readers to the many bulky volumes in which they are scattered, I ahull give them a view of some of the most important articles in these charters, ranged under two general heads. I. Such aa respect personal safety. II. Such as respect the security of property. I. During that state of turbulence and disorder which the corruption of the feudal government introduced into Europe, personal safety was the hrst and great object of every individual ; and, as the great military barons 214 PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS OOE xvi. alone were able to give sufficient protection to their vassals, this was one threat source of their power and authority. But by the institution r>f communities effectual provision was made for the safety of individual/, independent of the nobles. For, 1. The fundamental 'ticle in eveiy charter was that all the members of the community bound themselves by oath to assist, defend, and stand by each other against all aggressors, and that they should not suffer any person to injure, distress, or molest any of their fellow-citizens. (D'Acher., SpiciL, x. 642, xi. 341, etc.) 2. Who- ever resided in any town which was made free was obliged, under a severe .penalty, to accede to the community and to take part in the mutual defence of its members. (D'Acher., SpiciL, xi. 344.) 3. The communities had the privilege of carrying arms ; of making war on their private enemies ; and of executing by military force any sentence which their magistrates pronounced. (D'Acher., Spicil., x. 643, 644, xi. 343.) 4. The practice of making satisfaction by a pecuniary compensation for murder, assault, or other acts of violence, most inconsistent with the order of society and the safety of individuals, was abolished ; and such as committed these crimes were punished capitally, or with rigour adequate to their guilt. (D'Ach., xi. 362 ; Mirsei Opera Diplomatica, i. 292.) 5. No member of a com- munity was bound to justify or defend himself by battle or combat ; but if he was charged with any crime he could be convicted only by the evidence of witnesses and the regular course of legal proceedings. (Mirceus, ibid. ; D'Ach., xi. 375, 349 ; Ordon., torn. iii. p. 265.) 6. If any man suspected himself to be in danger from the malice or enmity of another, upon his making oath to that effect before a magistrate the person suspected was bound under a severe penalty to give security for his peaceable be- haviour. (D'Ach., xi. 346.) This is the same species of security which is still known in Scotland under the name of law burrows. Tn France it was first introduced among the inhabitants of communities, and, having been found to contribute considerably towards personal safety, it was ex- tended to all the other members of the society. Etablissemens de St. Louis, liv. L cap. 28, ap. Du Cange, Vie de St. Louis, p. 15. II. The provisions in the charters of communities concerning the secu- rity of property are not less considerable than those respecting personal safety, by the ancient law of France, no person could be arrested or con- fined in prison on account of any private debt (Ordon. des Rois de France, torn. i. pp. 72, 80.) If any person was arrested upon any pre- text but his having been guilty of a capital crime, it was lawful to rescue him out of the hands of the officers who had seized him. (Ordon., torn. iii. p. 1 7.) Freedom from arrest on account of debt seems likewise to have been enjoyed in other countries. (Gudenus, Sylloge Diplom., 473.) In society, while it remained in its rudest and most simple form, debt seems to have been considered as an obligation merely personaL Men had made some progress towards refinement before creditors acquired a right of seizing the property of their debtors in order to recover payment. The expedients for this purpose were all introduced originally in communities, and we can trace the gradual progress of them. 1. The simplest and most obvious species of security was that the person who sold any com modity should receive a pledge from him who bought it, which he re- stored upon receiving pavment. Of this custom there are vestiges in NOTE xvi.] PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 215 several charters of community. (D'Ach., ix. 185, xi, ,377.) 2. When no pledge was given, and the debtor became refractor) or insolvent, the creditor was allowed to seize his effects with a strong hand and by his private authority ; the citizens of Paris are wan-anted by the royal man- date, " ut ubicumque, et quocumque modo poterunt, tantum capiant, unde pecuniam sibi debitam integre et plenarie habeant, et inde sibi invicem udju tores existant." (Ordon., etc., torn, i. p. 6.) This rude prac- tice, suitable only to the violence of that which has been called a state of nature, was tolerated longer than one can conceive to be possible in any society where laws and order were at all known. The ordinance autho- rizing it was issued A.D. 1134; and that which corrects the law, and prohibits creditors from seizing the effects of their debtors unless by a warrant from a magistrate and under his inspection, was not published until the year 1351. (Ordon., torn, k p. 438.) It is probable, how- ever, that men were taught, by observing the disorders which the former mode of proceeding occasioned, to correct it in practice long before a remedy was provided by a law to that effect. Every discerning reader will apply this observation to many other customs and practices which I have mentioned. New customs are not always to be ascribed to the laws which authorize them. Those statutes only give a legal sanction to such things as the experience of mankind has previously found to be proper and beneficial. 3. As soon as the interposition of the magistrate became requisite, regular provision was made for attaching or distraining the movable effects of a debtor ; and if his movables were not sufficient to discharge the debt, his immovable property, or estate in land, was liable to the same distress, and was sold for the benefit of his creditor. (D'Ach., ix. 184, 185, xi. 348, 380.) As this regulation afforded the most complete security to the creditor, it was considered as so severe that humanity pointed out several limitations in the execution of it. Creditors were prohibited from seizing the wearing-apparel of their debtors, their beds, the door of their house, their instruments of husbandly, etc. (D'Ach., ix. 184, xi. 377.) Upon the same principles, when the power of distraining effects became more general, the horse and arms of a gentleman could not be seized. (D'Ach., ix. 185.) As hunting was the favourite amusement of martial nobles, the emperor Ludovicus Pius prohibited the seizing of a hawk on account of any composition or debt. (Capitul., lib. iv. 21.) But, if the debtor had no other movables, even these privileged articles might be seized. 4. In order to render the security of property complete within a community, every person who was admitted a member of it was obliged to buy or build a house, or to pur- chase lands within its precincts, or at least to bring into the town a con- siderable portion of his movables, per qucs justiciari possit, si quid forte in eum querdiz cvenerit. (D'Ach., xi 326 ; Ordon., torn. i. p. 367 ; Liber- tates S. Georgii de Esperanchia, Hist, de Dauphins', torn, i p. 26.) 5. That security might be as perfect as possible, in some towns the me n- bers of the community seem to have been bound for each other. (D'A ;h., x., 644.) 6. All questions with respect to property were tried within the community, by magistrates and judges whom the citizens elected or appointed. Their decisions were more equal and fixed than the sentences which depended on the capricious and arbitrary will of a baron, who 21 G PEOOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE xvi. thought himself superior to all laws. (D'Ach., x. 644, 646, xi. 344, et passim ; Ordon., torn, iil p. 204.) 7. No member of a community could be burdened by any arbitrary tax ; for the superior lord, who granted the charter of community, accepted of a fixed census or duty in lieu of all demands. (Ordon., torn. iii. p. 204 ; Libertates de Calma, Hist, de Dauphins', torn. i. p. 19 ; Libertates S. Georgii de Esperanchia, ibid., p. 26.) Nor could the members of a community be distressed by an un- equal imposition of the sum to be levied on the community. Regulations are inserted in the charters of some communities concerning the method of determining the quota of any tax to be levied on each inhabitant. (D'Ach. , xi 350, 365.) St. Louis published an ordinance concerning this matter, which extended to all the communities. (Ordon., torn. i. p. 186.) These regulations are extremely favourable to liberty, as they vest the power of proportioning the taxes in a certain number of citizens chosen out of each parish, who were bound by solemn oath to decide according to justice. That the more perfect security of property was one great object of those who instituted communities, we learn not only from the nature of the thing, but from the express words of several charters, of which I shall only mention that granted by Alienor, queen of England and duchess of Guienne, to the community of Poitiers, " ut sua propria melius defendere possint, et magis integre custodire." (Du Cange, voc. Communia, vol. ii. p. 863.) Such are some of the capital regulations established in communities during the twelfth and thirteenth centuries. These may be considered as the first expedients for the re-establishment of law and order, and contributed greatly to introduce regular government among all the members of society. As soon as communities were instituted, high sentiments of liberty began to manifest themselves. When Humbert, lord of Beaujeu, upon granting a charter of community to the town of Belleville, exacted of the inhabit- ants an oath of fidelity to himself and successors, they stipulated, on their part, that he shoxild swear to maintain their franchises and liberties ; and, for their greater security, they obliged him to bring twenty gentlemen to take the same oath and to be bound together with him. (D'Ach., ix. 183.) In the same manner, the lord of Moriens in Dauphine produced a certain number of persons as his sureties for the observation of the articles contained in the charter of community to that town. These were bound to surrender themselves prisoners to the inhabitants of Moriens if their liege-lord should violate any of their franchises, and they promised to re- main in custody until he should grant the members of the community redress. (Hist, de Dauphin^, torn. i. p. 17.) If the mayor or chief magistrate of a town did any injury to a citizen, he was obliged to give security for his appearance in judgment, in the same manner as a private person, and, if cast, was liable to the same penalty. (D'Ach., ix. 183.) These are ideas of equality uncommon in the feudal times. Communities were so favourable to freedom that they were distinguished by the name of libertates. (Du Cange, voL ii. p. 863.) They were at first extremely odious to the nobles, who foresaw what a check they must prove to their power and domination. Guibert, abbot of Nogent, calls them execrable inventions, by which, contrary to law and justice, slaves withdrew them- selves from that obedience which they owed to their masters. (Du Gauge, ibid., p. 862.) The zeal with which some of the nobles and powerful NOTE xvn.] PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 217 ecclesiastics opposed the establishment of communities and endeavoured to circumscribe tlicir privileges was extraordinary. A striking instance of this occurs in the contests between the archbishop of Rheims and the in- habitants of that community. It was the chief business of every arch- bishop, during a considerable time, to abridge the rights and jurisdiction of the community ; and the great object of the citizens, especially when the see was vacant, to maintain, to recover, and to extend their own juris- diction. Histoire civile et politiquede la Ville de Reims, parM. Anquetil, torn, i p. 287, etc. The observations which I have made concerning the low state of cities, and the condition of their inhabitants, are confirmed by innumerable passages in the historians and laws of the Middle Ages, It is not im- probable, however, that some cities of the first order were in a better state and enjoyed a superior degree of liberty. Under the Roman government the municipal government established in cities was extremely favourable to liberty. The jurisdiction of the senate in each corporation, and the privileges of the citizens, were both extensive. There is reason to believe that some of the greater cities, which escaped the destructive rage of the barbarous nations, still retained their ancient form of government, at least in a great measure. They were governed by a council of citizens, and by magistrates whom they themselves elected. Very strong presumptions in favour of this opinion are produced by M. 1'Abbd de Bos, Hist crit. de la Mon. Frang., torn. i. p. 18, etc., torn, ii, p. 524, edit 1742. It appears from some of the charters of community to cities, granted in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, that these only confirm the privileges possessed by the inhabitants previous to the establishment of the community. (D'Acher., Spicileg., vol. xi. p. 345.) Other cities claimed their privi- leges, as having possessed them without interruption from the times of the Romans. (Hist crit de la Mon. Franc., torn. ii. p. 333.) But the number of cities which enjoyed such immunities was so small as hardly in any degree to diminish the force of my conclusions in the text NOTE XVII. Sect I. p. 33. Having given a full account of the establishment, as well as effects, of communities in Italy and France, it will be necessary to inquire with some attention into the progress of cities and of municipal government in Germany. The ancient Germans had no cities. Even in their hamlets or villages they did not build their houses contiguous to each other. (Tacit, de Mor. Germ., cap. 16.) They considered it as a badge of servitude to be obliged to dwell in a city siirrounded with walls. When one of their tribes had shaken off the Roman yoke, their countrymen required of them, as an evidence of their having recovered liberty, to demolish the walls of a town which the Romans had built in their country. Even the fiercest animals, said they, lose their spirit and courage when they are confined. (Tacit, Histor., lib. iv. c. 64.) The Romans built several cities of note on the banks of the Rhine. But in all the vast countries from that river to the coasts of the Baltic there was hardly one city previous to the ninth century of the Christian era, (Conringius, Exercitatio de Urbibus Ger- manise, Oper., vol. i. 25, 27, 31, etc.) Heineccius differs from Con- 218 PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE xvn. ringius with respect to this. But, even after allowing to his arguments and authorities their utmost force, they prove only that there were a few places in those extensive regions on which some historians have bestowed the name of towns. (Elem. Jur. German., lib. i. 102.) Under Charle- magne and the emperors of his family, as the political state of Germany began to improve, several cities were founded, and men became accustomed to associate and to live together in one place. Charlemagne founded two archbishoprics and nine bishoprics in the most considerable towns of Ger- many. (Aub. Miroei Opera Diplomatica, vol. i. p. 16.) His successors increased the number of these ; and as bishops fixed their residence in the chief town of their diocese, and performed religious functions there, that induced many people to settle in them. (Coming., ibid., 48.) But Henry, surnamed the Fowler, who began his reign A.D. 920, must be con- sidered as the great founder of cities in Germany. The empire was at that time infested by the incursions of the Hungarians and other barbarous people. In order to oppose them, Henry encouraged his subjects to settle in cities, which he surrounded with walls strengthened by towers. He enjoined or persuaded a certain proportion of the nobility to fix their residence in the towns, and thus rendered the condition of citizens more honourable than it had been formerly. (Wittikindus, Annal., lib. i., ap. Conring., 82.) From this period the number of cities continued to increase, and they became more populous and more wealthy. But cities in Germany were still destitute of municipal liberty or jurisdiction. Such of them as were situated in the imperial demesnes were subject to the emperors. Their comites, missi, and other judges presided in them and dispensed justice. Towns situated on the estate of a baron were part of his fief, and he or his officers exercised a similar jurisdiction in them. (Conring., ibid., 73, 74 ; Heinec., Elem. Jur. Germ., lib. i. 104.) The Germans borrowed the institution of communities from the Italians. (Kuipschil- dius, Tractatus Politico-Histor. Jurid. de Civitatum Imperialium Juribus, vol. i. lib. i cap. 5, no. 23.) Frederic Barbarossa was the first emperor who, from the same political consideration that influenced Louis le Gros, multiplied communities in order to abridge the power of the nobles. (Pfeffel, Abrdge de 1'Histoire et du Droit publique d'Allemagne, 4to, p. 297.) From the reign of Henry the Fowler to the time when the German cities acquired full possession of their immunities, various circumstances contributed to their increase. The establishment of bishoprics (already mentioned), and the building of cathedrals, naturally induced many people to settle near the chief place of worship. It became the custom to hold councils and courts of judicature of every kind, ecclesiastical as well as civil, in cities. In the eleventh centuiy many slaves were enfranchised, the greater part of whom settled in cities. Several mines were discovered and wrought in different provinces, which drew together such a concourse of people as gave rise to several cities and increased the number of inhabi- tants in others. (Conring., 105.) The cities began in the thirteenth century to form leagues for their mutual defence, and for repressing the disorders occasioned by the private wars among the barons, as well as by their exactions. This rendered the condition of the inhabitants of cities more secure than that of any other order of men, and allured many to become members of their communities. (Coming., 94.) There were xvin.] PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 219 inhabitants of three different ranks in the towns of Germany : the nobles, or familce ; the citizens, or liberi ; and the artisans, who were slaves, or homines proprii. (Knipschild. , lib. ii cap. 29, no. 13.) Henry V., who began his reign A.D. 1106, enfranchised the slaves who were artisans or inhabitants in several towns, and gave them the rank of citizens or liberi. (Pfeffel, p. 254; Knipsch., lib. ii c. 29, nos. 113, 119.) Though the cities in Germany did not acquire liberty so early as those in France, they extended their privileges much farther. All the imperial and free cities, the number of which is considerable, acquired the full right of being immediate ; by which term, in the German jurisprudence, we are to under- stand that they are subject to the empire alone, and possess within their own precincts all the rights of complete and independent sovereignty. The various privileges of the imperial cities, the great guardians of the Germanic liberties, are enumerated by Knipschildius, lib. ii. The most important articles are generally known, and it would be improper to enter into any disquisition concerning minute particulars. NOTE XVIII. Sect. L p. 33. The Spanish historians are almost entirely silent concerning the origin and progress of communities in that kingdom ; so -that I cannot fix with any degree of certainty the time and manner of their first introduction there. It appears, however, from Mariana, vol. ii. p. 221, fol. Hagse, 1736, that in the year 1350 eighteen cities had obtained a seat in the cortes of Castile. From the account which will be given of their constitution and pretensions, Sect. III. of this volume, it will appear that their privileges and form of government were the same with those of the other feudal corporations ; and this, as well as the perfect similarity of political insti- tutions and transactions in all the feudal kingdoms, may lead us to conclude that communities were introduced there in the same manner and probably about the same time as in the other nations of Europe. In Aragon, as I shall have occasion to observe in a subsequent note, cities seem early to have acquired extensive immunities, together with a share in the legislature. In the year 1118 the citizens of Saragossa had not only attained political liberty, but they were declared to be of equal rank with the nobles of the second class ; and many other immunities, unknown to persons in their rank of life in other parts of Europe, were conferred upon them. (Zurita, Anales de Aragon, torn, i p. 44.) In England, the establishment of communities or corporations was posterior to the Con- quest. The practice was borrowed from France, and the privileges granted by the crown were perfectly similar to those which I have enumerated. But, as this part of history is well known to most of my readers, I shall, without entering into any critical or minute discussion, refer them to authors who have fully illustrated this interesting point in the English history. (Brady's Treatise of Boroughs ; Madox, Firma Burgi, cap. i. sect. ix. ; Hume's History of England, voL i., Append, i. and ii.) It is not improbable that some of the towns in England were formed into cor- porations under the Saxon kings, and that the charters granted by the kings of the Norman race were not charters of enfranchisement from a state of slavery, but a confirmation of privileges which they already 220 PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE xix. enjoyed. (See Lord Lyttelton's History of Henry II., vol. ii. p. 317.) The English cities, however, were very inconsiderable in the twelfth century. A clear proof of this occurs in the history to which I last referred. Fitzstephen, a contemporary author, gives a description of the city of London in the reign of Henry II., and the terms in which he speaks of its trade, its wealth, and the splendour of its inhabitants, would suggest uo inadequate idea of its state at present, when it is the greatest and most opulent city of Europe. But all ideas of grandeur and magnifi- cence are merely comparative ; and every description of them in general terms is very apt to deceive. It appears from Peter of Blois, archdeacon of London, who flourished in the same reign, and who had good oppor- tunity of being well informed, that this city, of which Fitzstephen gives such a pompous account, contained no more than forty thousand inhabi- tants. (Ibid, pp. 315, '316.) The other cities were small in proportion, and were not in a condition to extort any extensive privileges. That the constitution of the boroughs in Scotland, in many circumstances, resembled that of the towns in France and England, is manifest from the Leges Burgorum, annexed to the Regiam Majestatem. NOTE XIX. Sect. I. p. 38. Soon after the introduction of the third estate into the national council, the spirit of liberty which that excited in France began to produce con- spicuous effects. In several provinces of France the nobility and com- munities formed associations whereby they bound themselves to defend their rights and privileges against the formidable and arbitrary proceedings of the king. The Count de Boulainvilliers has preserved a copy of one of these associations, dated in the year 1314, twelve years after the admis- sion of the deputies from towns into the states-general. (Histoire de 1'ancien Gouvemement de la France, torn. ii. p. 94.) The vigour with which the people asserted and prepared to maintain their rights obliged their sovereigns to respect them. Six years after this association, Philip the Long issued a writ of summons to the community of Narbonne, in the following terms : " Philip, by the grace, etc., to our well-beloved, etc. As we desire with all our heart, and above all other things, to govern our kingdom and people in peace and tranquillity, by the help of God, and to reform our said kingdom in so far as it stands in need thereof, for the public good and for the benefit of our subjects, who in times past have been aggrieved and oppressed in divers manners by the malice of sundry persons, as we have learned by common report, as well as by the information of good men worthy of credit, and we having determined in our council which we have called to meet in our good city, etc., to give redress to the utmost of our power, by all ways and means possible, according to reason and justice, and willing that this should be done with solemnity and deliberation, by the advice of the prelates, barons, and good towns of our realm, and particularly of you, and that it should be trans- acted agreeably to the will of God and for the good of our people, therefore we command," etc. (Mably, Observat., vol. iii., App., p. 386.) I shall allow these to be only the formal words of a public and legal style ; but the ideas are singular, and much more liberal and enlarged than one could NOTE xx.] PEOOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 221 expect in that age. A popular monarch of Great Britain could hardly address himself to parliament in terms more favourable to public liberty. There occurs in the history of France a striking instance of the progress which the principles of liberty had made in that kingdom, and of the influence which the deputies of towns had acquired in the states-general. During the calamities in which the war with England and the captivity of King John had involved France, the states-general made a bold efl'ort to extend their own privileges and jurisdiction. The regulations established by the states held A.D. 1355, concerning the mode of levying taxes, the administration of wliich they vested, not in the crown, but in commis- sioners appointed by the states ; concerning the coining of money ; con- cerning the redress of the grievance of purveyance ; concerning the regular administration of justice, are much more suitable to the genius of a republican government than that of a feudal monarchy. This curious statute is published, Ordon., torn. iii. p. 19. Such as have not an oppor- tunity to consult that large collection will find an abridgment of it in Hist, de France par Villaret, torn. ix. p. 130, or in Histoire de Boulainv., torn. ii. p. 213. The French historians represent the bishop of Laon, and Marcel, provost of the merchants of Paris, who had the chief direction of this assembly, as seditious tribunes, violent, interested, ambitious, and aiming at innovations subversive of the constitution and government of their country. That may have been the case ; but these men possessed the confidence of the people ; and the measures which they proposed as the most popular and acceptable, as well as most likely to increase their own influence, plainly prove that the spirit of liberty had spread wonder- fully, and that the ideas which then prevailed in France concerning government were extremely liberal The states-general held at Paris A.D. 1355 consisted of about eight hundred members, and above one-half of these were deputies from towns. (M. Secousse, Pref. a Ordon., torn. iii. p. 48.) It appears that in all the different assemblies of the states held during the reign of John, the representatives of towns had great influence, and in every respect the tliird state was considered as co-ordinate and equal to either of the other two. (Ibid., passim.) These spirited efforts were made in France long before the House of Commons in England acquired any considerable influence in the legislature. As the feudal system was carried to its utmost height in France sooner than in England, so it began to decline sooner in the former than in the latter kingdom. In England, almost all attempts to establish or to extend the liberty of the people have been successful ; in France, they have proved unfortunate. What were the accidental events or political causes which occasioned this difference it ia not my present business to inquire. Note XX. Sect I. p. 40. In a former Note [No. VIII.] I have inquired into the condition of that part of the people which was employed in agriculture, and have represented the various hardships and calamities of their situation. When charters of liberty or manumission were granted to such persons, they contained four concessions corresponding to the four capital grievances to which men in a state of servitude are subject. 1. The right of disposing of their persona 222 PKOOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE xx. by sale or grant was relinquished. 2. Power was given to them of con- veying their property and effects by will or any other legal deed. Or if they happened to die intestate, it was provided that their property should go to their lawful heirs, in the same manner as the property of other persons. 3. The services and taxes which they owed to their superior or liege-lord, which were formerly arbitrary and imposed at pleasure, are precisely ascertained. 4. They are allowed the privilege of marrying according to their own inclination : formerly they could contract no mar- riage without their lord's permission, and with no person but one of his slaves. All these particulars are found united in the charter granted " HabitatoriLus Montis Britonis," A.D. 1376. (Hist, de Dauphind, torn. i. p. 81.) Many circumstances concurred with those wliich I have men- tioned in the text in procuring them deliverance from that wretched state. The gentle spirit of the Christian religion, the doctrines which it teaches concerning the original equality of mankind, its tenets with respect to the divine government and the impartial eye with which the Almighty regards men of every condition and admits them to a participation of his benefits, are all inconsistent with servitude. But in this, as in many other instances, considerations i if interest and the maxims of false policy led men to a conduct inconsistent with their principles. They were so sensible, however, of this inconsistency, that to set their fellow-Christians at liberty from servitude was deemed an act of piety highly meritorious and accept- able to Heaven. The humane spirit of the Christian religion struggled long with the maxims and manners of the world, and contributed more than any other circumstance to introduce the practice of manumission. When Pope Gregory the Great, who flourished towards the end of the sixth century, granted liberty to some of his slaves, he gives this reason for it : " Cum Redemptor noster, totius conditor naturae, ad hoc propitiatus humanam carnem voluerit assumere, ut divinitatis suae gratia, dirempto (quo tenebamur captivi) vinculo, pristinse nos restitueret libertati ; salu- briter agitur, si homines, quos ab initio liberos natura protulit, et jus gentium jugo substituit servitutis, in ea, qua nati fuerant, manumittentis beneficio, libertati reddantur." (Gregor. Magn., ap. Potgiess., lib. iv. c. i, 3.) Several laws or charters founded on reasons similar to this are pro- duced by the same author. Accordingly, a great part of the charters of manumission, previous to the reign of Loiiis X., are granted "pro amore Dei, pro remedio animse, et pro mercede animse." (Murat., Antiq. Ital., vol. i. pp. 849, 850 ; Du Cange, voc. Manumissio.) The formality of manumission was executed in a church, as a religious solemnity. The person to be set free was led round the great altar with a torch in his hand, he took hold of the horns of the altar, and there the solemn words con- ferring liberty were pronounced. (Du Cange, ibid., vol. iv. p. 467.) I shall transcribe a part of a charter of manumission granted A.D. 1056, both as it contains a full account of the ceremonies used in this form of manu- mission, and as a specimen of the imperfect knowledge of the Latin tongue in that barbarous age. It is granted by Willa, the widow of Hugo, the duke and marquis, in favour of Clariza, one of her slaves. " Et ideo noa Domina Wille inclite cometisse libera et absolve te Cleriza filia Uberto pro timore omnipotentis Dei, et remedio luminarie anime bone memorie quondam supra scripto Domini Ugo gloriossissimo ? ut quando ilium Domi- NOTE xx.] PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 223 mis de hac vita migrare jusserit, pars iniqua non abeat potestatem ullam, sed anguelus Domini nostri Jesu Christi colocare dignitur ilium inter sanctos dilectos suos ; et beatus Petrus princips apostolorum, qui habed potestatem omnium animarum ligandi et absolvendi, ut ipsi absolvat iinimce ejus de peccatis sui, aperiad ilium janua paradisi ; pro eadem vero r itioni, in mano mite te, Benzo presbiter, ut vadat tecum in ecclesia sancti Bartholomaei apostoli ; traad de tribus vicibus circa altare ipsius ecclesise cum caereo apprehensum in manibus tuis et manibus suis ; deiride exite ambulate in via quadrubio, ubi quatuor vie se dividuntur. Statimque pro remedio luminarie anime bone memorie quondam supra scripto Domini Ugo et ipsi presbiter Benzo fecit omnia, et dixit, Ecce quatuor vie, ite et ambulate in quacunque partem tibi placuerit, tam sic supra scripta Cleriza, qua nosque tui heredes, qui ab ac hora in antea nati, vel procreati fuerit utriusque sexus," etc. (Murat., ibid., p. 853. ) Many other charters might have been selected which in point of grammar or style are in no wise superior to this. Manumission was frequently granted on death-bed or by latter will. As the minds of men are at that time awakened to sentiments of humanity and piety, these deeds proceeded from religious motives, and were granted pro redemptione animce, in order to obtain acceptance with God. (Du Cange, ubi supra, p. 470, et. voc. Servus, vol. vi. p. 451.) Another method of obtaining liberty was by entering into holy orders, or taking the vow in a monastery. This was permitted for some time ; but so many slaves escaped, by this means, out of the hands of their masters, that the practice was afterwards restrained, and at last prohibited, by the laws of almost all the nations of Europe. (Murat., ibid., p. 842.) Conformably to the same principles, princes, on the birth of a son, or upon any other agreeable event, appointed a certain number of slaves to be enfranchised, as a testimony of their gratitude to God for that benefit. (Marculfi Form., lib. i. cap. 39.) There are several forms of manumission published by Marculfus, and all of them are founded on i-eligious considerations, in order to procure the favour of God or to obtain the forgiveness of their sins. (Lib. ii. c. 23, 33, 34, edit. Baluz.) The same observation holds with respect to the other collections of Formulae annexed to Marculfus. As sentiments of religion induced some to grant liberty to their fellow-Christians who groaned under the yoke of servitude, so mistaken ideas concerning devotion led others to relinquish their liberty. When a person conceived an extraordinary respect for the saint who was the patron of any church or monastery in which he was accustomed to attend religious worship, it was not unusual, among men possessed with an excess of superstitious reverence, to give up themselves and their pos- terity to be the slaves of the saint (Mabillon, De Re Diplomat, lib. vi. p. 63^.) The oblati, or voluntary slaves of churches or monasteries, were very numerous, and may be divided into three different classes. The first were such as put themselves and effects under the protection of a particular church or monastery, binding themselves to defend its privileges and pro- perty against every aggressor. These were prompted to do so not merely by devotion, but in order to obtain that security which arose from the protection of the Church. They were rather vassals than slaves, and sometimes persons of noble birth found it prudent to secure the protection of the Church in this manner. Persons of the second class bound them- 224 PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE ** selves to pay an annual tax or quit-rent out of their estates to a church or monastery. Besides this, they sometimes engaged to perform certain services. They were called censuales. The last class consisted of such as actually renounced their liberty and became slaves in the strict and proper sense of the word. These were called minister idles, and enslaved their bodies, as some of the charters bear, that they might procure the liberty Df their souls. (Potgiesserus, De Statu Servorum, lib. L c. 1, 6, 7.) How zealous the clergy were to encourage the opinions which led to this practice, will appear from a clause in a charter by which one gives up himself as a slave to a monastery : " Cum sit omni carnali ingenuitate generosius extremum quodcumque Dei servitium, scilicet quod terrena nobilitas multos plerumque vitiorum servos ftx.'it, servi^us vero Christi nobiles virtutibus reddit, nemo autem sani capitis virtutil as vitia compara- verit, claret pro certo eum esse generosiorem, qui se Dei servitio prsebuerit proniorem. Quod ego Ragnaldus intelligens," etc. Another charter is expressed in the following words : " Eligens magis esse servus Dei quam libertus sseculi, firmiter credens et sciens, quod servire Deo, regnare est, summaque ingenuitas sit in qua servitus comparabatur Christi," etc. (Du Gauge, voc. Oblatus, vol. iv. pp. 128(5, 1287.) Great, however, as the power of religion was, it does not appear that the enfranchisement of slaves was a frequent practice while the feudal system preserved its vigour. On the contrary, there were laws which set bounds to it, as detrimental to society. (Potgiess., lib. iv. c. ii. 6.) The inferior order of men owed the recovery of their liberty to the decline of that aristocratical policy which lodged the most extensive power in the hands of a few members of the society and depressed all the rest. When Louis X. issued his ordi- nance, several slaves had been so long accustomed to servitude, and their minds were so much debased by that unhappy situation, that they refused to accept of the liberty which was offered them. (D'Ach., SpiciL, vol. xi. p. 387.) Long after the reign of Louis X. several of the French nobility continued to assert their ancient dominion over their slaves. It appears from an ordinance of the famous Bertrand de Guesclin, constable of France, that the custom of enfranchising them was considered as a pernicious inno- vation. (Morice, Me'm. pour servir de Preuves a 1'Hist. de Bret., torn. ii. p. 100.) In some instances, when the prsedial slaves were declared to be freemen, they were still bound to perform certain services to their ancient masters, and were kept in a state different from other subjects, being re- stricted either from purchasing land or becoming members of a community within the precincts of the manor to which they formerly belonged. (Martene et Durand, Thesaur. Anecdot., vol. i. p. 914.) This, however, ems not to have been common. There is no general law for the manu- mission of slaves in the Statute-book of England, similar to that which has been quotad from the Ordonnances of the kings of France. Though the genius of the English constitution seems early to have favoured per- sonal liberty, personal servitude, nevertheless, continued long in England in some particular places. In the year 1514 we find a charter of Henry VIII. enfranchising two slaves belonging to one of his manors. (Rym., Feeder., vol. xiii. p. 470.) As late as the year 1574, there is a commission from Queen Elizabeth with respect to the manumission of certain bondmen belonging to her. Rymer, in Observat. on the Statutes, etc., p. 251 NOTB xxi.] PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 226 NOTE XXI. Sect. I. p. 46. There is no custom in the Middle Ages more singular than that of private war. It is a right of so great importance, and prevailed so uni- versally, that the regulations concerning it occupy a considerable place in the system of laws during the Middle Ages. M. de Montesquieu, who has unravelled so many intricate points in feudal jurisprudence and thrown light on so many customs formerly obscure and unintelligible, was not led by his subject to consider this. I shall therefore give a more minute account of the customs and regulations which directed a practice so con- trary to the present ideas of civilised nations concerning government and order. 1. Among the ancient Germans, as well as other nations in a similar state of society, the right of avenging injuries was a private and personal right exercised by force of arms, without any reference to an umpire or any appeal to a magistrate for decision. The clearest proofs of this were produced, Note VI. 2. This practice subsisted among the barbarous nations after their settlement in the provinces of the empire which they conquered ; and as the causes of dissension among them mul- tiplied, their family feuds and private wars became more frequent. Proofs of this occur in their early historians (Greg. Turon., Hist, lib. vii. c. 2, lib. viii c. 18, lib. x. c. 27), and likewise in the codes of their laws. It was not only allowable for the relations to avenge the injuries of their family, but it was incumbent on them. Thus, by the laws of the Angli and Werini, " ad quemcunque hereditas terrse pervenerit, ad ilium vest is bellica, id est lorica et ultio proxiini, et solatio leudis, debet pertinere" (tit. vi. 5, ap. Lindenbr., Leg. Saliq., tit. 63 ; Leg. Longob., lib. iL tit. 14, 10). 3. None but gentlemen, or persons of noble birth, had the right of private war. All disputes between slaves, villani, the inhabitants of towns, and freemen of inferior condition, were decided in the courts of justice. All disputes between gentlemen and persons of inferior rank were terminated in the same manner. The right of private war supposed nobility of birth and equality of rank in both the contending parties. (Befiumanoir, Coustumes de Beauv., ch. lix. p. 300 ; Ordon. des Rois de France, torn, ii. p. 395, xvii p. 508, xv., etc.) The dignified eccle- siastics likewise claimed and exercised the right of private war ; but, as it was not altogether decent for them to prosecute quarrels in person, advocati or vidames were chosen by the several monasteries or bishoprics. These were commonly men of high rank and reputation, who became the pro- tectors of the churches and convents by which they were elected ; espoused their quarrels, and fought their battles ; " armis omnia quse erant ecclesiae viriliter defendebant, et vigilanter protegebant." (Brussel, Usage dei Fiefs, torn. i. p. 144; Du Cange, voc. Advocatus.) On many occasions the martial ideas to which ecclesiastics of noble birth were accustomed made them forget the pacific spirit of their profession, and led them into the field in person at the head of their vassals : " flamma, ferro, csede, possessiones ecclesiarum prrelati defendebant." (Guido Abbas, ap. Du Cange, ibid., p. 179.) 4. It was not every injury or trespass that gave a gentleman a title to make war upon his adversary. Atrocious acts of violence, insults, and affronts, publicly committed, were legal and per VOL. i. Q 226 PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE xxi. raitted motives for taking arms against the authors of them. Such crimes as are now punished capitally in civilised nations at that time justified private hostilities. (Beauman., ch. lix. ; Du Cange, Dissert. XXIX., sur Joinville, p. 331.) But though the avenging of injuries was the only motive that could legally authorise a private war, yet disputes concerning civil property often gave rise to hostilities and were terminated by the sword. (Du Cange, Dissert., p. 332.) 5. All persons present when any quarrel arose or any act of violence was committed were included in the war which it occasioned ; for it was supposed to be impossible for any man in such a situation to remain neuter, without taking side with one or other of the contending parties. (Beauman., p. 300.) 6. All the kindred of the two principals in the war were included in it, and obliged to espouse the quarrel of the chieftain with whom they were connected. (Du Cange, ibid., p. 332.) This was founded on the maxim of the ancient Germans, " suscipere tarn inimicitias seu patris, seu propinqui, quam amicitias, necesse est ; " a maxim natural to all rude nations, among which the form of society, and political union, strengthen such a sentiment. This obliga- tion-was enforced by legal authority. If a person refused to take part in the quarrel of his kinsman and to aid him against his adversary, he was deemed to have renounced all the rights and privileges of kindredship, and became incapable of succeeding to any of his relations, or of deriving any benefit from any civil right or property belonging to them. (Du Gauge, Dissert., p. 333.) The method of ascertaining the degree of affinity which obliged a person to take part in the quarrel of a kinsman was curious. While the Church prohibited the marriage of persons within the seventh degree of affinity, the vengeance of private war extended as far as this absurd prohibition, and all who had such a remote connection with any of the principals were involved in the calamities of war. But when the Church relaxed somewhat of its rigour, and did not extend its prohibition of marrying beyond the fourth degree of affinity, the same restriction took place in the conduct of private war. (Beauman., p. 303 ; Du Cange, Dissert., p. 333.) 7. A private war could not be carried on between two full brothers, because both have the same common kindred, and conse- quently neither had any persons bound to stand by him against the other in the contest ; but two brothers of the half-blood might wage war, because each of them has a distinct kindred. (Beauman., p. 299.) 8. The vassals of each principal in any private war were involved in the contest, because, by the feudal maxims, they were bound to take arms in defence of the chieftain of whom they held, and to assist him in every quarrel. As soon, therefore, as feudal tenures were introduced, and this artificial connection was established between vassals and the baron of whom they held, vassals came to be considered as in the same state with relations. (Beauman., p. 303.) 9. Private wars were very frequent for several centuries. Nothing contributed more to increase those disorders in government or to encourage such ferocity of manners as reduced the nations of Europe to that wretched state which distinguished the period of history which I am reviewing. Nothing was such an obstacle to the introduction of a regular administration of justice. Nothing could more effectually discourage industry or retard the progress and cultivation of the arts of peace. Private wans were earned on with all the destructive rage which is to be dreaded NOTE xxi.] PEOOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 227 from violent resentment when armed with force and authorised by law. It appears from the statutes prohibiting or restraining the exercise of private hostilities that the invasion of the most barbarous enemy could not be more desolating to a country, or more fatal to its inhabitants, than those intestine wars. (Ordon., torn. i. p. 701, torn. ii. pp. 395, 408, 507, etc.) The contemporary historians describe the excesses committed in prosecution of these quarrels in such terms as excite astonishment and horror. I shall mention only one passage from the History of the Holy War, by Guibert, abbot of Nogent : " Erat eo tempore, maximis ad invicem hostilitatibus, totius Francorum regni facta turbatio ; crebra uhique latrocinia, viarum obsessio ; audiebantur passim, immo tiebant inceiulia infinita ; nullis prater sola et indomita cupiditate existentibus causis, extruebantur prselia ; et ut brevi totum claudam, quicquid obtutibus cupidorum subjacebat, nusquam attendendo cujus esset, prasdee patebat." Gesta Dei per Francos, vol. i. p. 482. Having thus collected the chief regulations which custom had established concerning the right and exercise of private war, I shall enumerate, in chronological order, the various expedients employed to abolish or restrain this fatal custom. 1. The first expedient employed by the civil magis- trate, in order to set some bounds to the violence of private revenge, was the fixing by law the fine or composition to be paid for each different crime. The injured person was originally the sole judge concerning the nature of the wrong which he had suffered, the degree of vengeance which he should exact, as well as the species of atonement or reparation with which he might rest satisfied. Resentment became, of course, as implacable as it was fierce. It was often a point of honour not to forgive, nor to be reconciled. This made it necessary to fix those compositions which make so great a figure in the laws of barbarous nations. The nature of crimes and offences was estimated by the magistrate, and the sum due to the person offended was ascertained with a minute, and often a whimsical, accuracy. Rotharis, the legislator of the Lombards, who reigned about the middle of the seventh century, discovers his intention both in ascer- taining the composition to be paid by the offender and in increasing its value : it is, says he, that the enmity may be extinguished, the prosecu- tion may cease, and peace may be restored. (Leg. Longob., bib. i. tit. 7, 10.) 2. About the beginning of the ninth century, Charlemagne struck at the root of the evil, and enacted " That when any person had been guilty of a crime, or had committed an outrage, he should immediately submit to the penance which the Church imposed, and offer to pay the composition which the law prescribed ; and if the injured person or his kindred should refuse to accept of this, and presume to avenge themselves by force of arms, their lands and properties should be forfeited." (CapituL, \.D. 802, edit. Baluz., vol. i. p. 371.) 3. But in this, as well as in other regulations, the genius of Charlemagne advanced before the spirit of his age. The ideas of his contemporaries concerning regular government were too imperfect, and their manners too tierce, to submit to this law. Private ware, with all the calamities which they occasioned, became more frequent than ever after the death of that great monarch. His successors were unable to restrain them. The Church found it necessary to interpose. The most early of these interpositions now extant is towards the end of Q li 228 PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE xxi. the tenth century. In the year 990, several bishops in the south of France assembled, and published various regulations in order to set some bounds to the violence and frequency of private wars : if any person within their dioceses should venture to transgress, they ordained that he should be excluded from all Christian privileges during his life, and be denied Christian burial after his death. (Du Mont, Corps Diplomatique, torn. i. p. 41.) These, however, were only partial remedies; and there- fore a council was held at Limoges, A.D. 994. The bodies of the saints, according to the custom of those ages, were carried thither ; and by these sacred relics men were exhorted to lay down their arms, to extinguish their animosities, and to swear that they would not, for the future, violate the public peace by their private hostilities. (Bouquet, Recueil des Histor., vol. x. pp. 49, 147.) Several other councils issued decrees to the same effect. (Du Cange, Dissert., 343.) 4. But the authority of councils, how venerable soever in those ages, was not sufficient to abolish a custom which flattered the pride of the nobles and gratified their favourite passions. The evil grew so intolerable that it became necessary to employ supernatural means for suppressing it. A bishop of Aquitaine, A.D. 1032, pretended that an angel had appeared to him and brought him a writing from Heaven, enjoining men to cease from their hostilities and to be recon- ciled to each other. It was during a season of public calamity that he published this revelation. The minds of men were disposed to receive pious impressions, and willing to perform anything in order to avert the wrath of Heaven. A general peace and cessation from hostilities took place, and continued for seven years ; and a resolution was formed that no man should, in times to come, attack or molest his ac'verwvies during the seasons set apart for celebrating the great festivals of the Church, or from the evening of Thursday in each week to the morning of Monday in the week ensuing, the intervening days being considered particularly holy, our Lord's passion having happened on one of these days, and his resurrection on another. A change in the dispositions of men so sudden, and which produced a resolution so unexpected, was considered as miraculous ; and the respite from hostilities which followed upon it was called the truce of God. (Glaber. Rodulphus, Histor., lib. v., ap. Bouquet, vol. x. p. 59.) This, from being a regulation or concert in one kingdom, became a general law in Christendom, was confirmed by the authority of several popes, and the violators were subjected to the penalty of excommunication. (Corpus Jur. Canon. Decretal., lib. i. tit. 34, c. 1 ; Du Cange, Glossar., voc. Treuga.) An act of the council of Toulujes in Roussillon, A.D. 1041, containing all the stipulations required by the truce of God, is published by Dom de Vic et Dom Vaisette, Hist, de Languedoc, torn, ii., Preuves, p. 206. A cessa- tion from hostilities during three complete days in every week allowed such a considerable space for the passions of the antagonists to cool, and for the people to enjoy a respite from the calamities of war, as well as to take measures for their own security, that if this truce of God had been exactly observed it must have gone far towards putting an end to private wars. This, however, seems not to have been the case : the nobles, dis- regarding the truce, prosecuted their quarrels without interruption, as formerly. " Qua nimirum tempestate, universse provinciee adeo devasta- tionis continuae importunitate inquietantur, ut ne ipsa, pro observatione xxi.] PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 229 divinae pacis, professa sacramenta custodian tur." (Abbas Uspurgensis, apud Datt., de Pace Imperil Publica, p. 13, no. 35.) The violent spirit of the nobility could not be restrained by any engagements. The com- plaints of this were frequent ; and bishops, in order to compel them to renew their vows and promises of ceasing from their private wars, were obliged to enjoin their clergy to suspend the performance of divine service and the exercise of any religious function within the parishes of such aa were refractory and obstinate. (Hist, de Langued., par D. D. de Vic et Vaisette, torn, ii., Preuves, p. 118.) 5. The people, eager to obtain relief from their sufferings, called in a second time revelation to their aid. Towards the end of the twelfth century, a carpenter in Guienne gave out that Jesus Christ, together with the blessed Virgin, had appeared to him, and having commanded him to exhort mankind to peace, had given him, as a proof of his mission, an image of the Virgin, holding her Son in her arms, with this inscription, Lamb of God, who takest away the sins of the world, give us peace. This low fanatic addressed himself to an ignorant age, prone to credit what was marvellous. He was received as an inspired messenger of God. Many prelates and barons assembled at Puy and took an oath not only to make peace with all their enemies, but to attack such as refused to lay down their arms and to be reconciled to their enemies. They formed an association for this purpose, and assumed the honourable name of the brotherhood of God. (Robertus de Monte Michaele, ap. M. de Lauriere, Prdf., torn, i., Orel on., p. 29.) But the influence of this super- stitious terror or devotion was not of long continuance. 6. The civil magistrate was obliged to exert his authority in order to check a custom which threatened a dissolution of government. Philip Augustus, as some imagine, or St. Louis, as is more probable, published an ordinance, A.D. 1245, prohibiting any person to commence hostilities against the friends and vassals of his adversary until forty days after the commission of the crime or pffence which gave rise to the quarrel : declaring that if any man presumed to transgress this statute, he should be considered as guilty of a breach of the public peace and be tried and punished by the judge ordinary as a traitor. (Ordon., torn. i. p. 56.) This was called the royal truce, and afforded time for the violence of resentment to subside, as well as leisure for the good offices of such as were willing to compose the difference. The happy effects of this regulation seem to have been considerable, if we may judge from the solicitude of succeeding monarchs to enforce it. 7. In order to restrain the exercise of private war still farther, Philip the Fair, towards the close of the same century, A.D. 1296, published an ordinance commanding all private hostilities to cease while he was engaged in war against the enemies of the state. (Ordon., torn, i pp. 328, 390.) This regulation, which seems to be almost essential to the existence and preservation of society, was often renewed by his suc- cessors, and, being enforced by the regal authority, proved a considerable check to the destructive contests of the nobles. Both these regulations, introduced first in France, were adopted by the other nations of Europe. 8. The evil, however, was so inveterate that it did not yield to all these remedies. No sooner was public peace established in any kingdom than the barons renewed their private hostilities. They not only struggled to maintain this pernicio'is right, but to secure the exercise of it without any 230 PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE XXL restraint. Upon the death of Philip the Fair, the nobles of different provinces in France formed associations, and presented remonstrances to his successor demanding the repeal of several laws by which he had abridged the privileges of their order. Among these the right of private- war is always mentioned as one of the most valuable ; and they claim that the restraint imposed by the truce of God, the royal truce, as well as tha'; arising from the ordinance of the year 1296, should be taken off. Ii. some instances the two sons of Philip, who mounted the throne sue cessively, eluded their demands ; in others they were obliged to makci concessions. (Ordon., torn. i. pp. 551, 557, 561, 573.) The . ordinances to which I here refer are of such length that I cannot insert them ; but they are extremely curious, and may be peculiarly instructive to an English reader, as they throw considerable light on that period of English history in which the attempts to circumscribe the regal prerogative were carried on, not by the people straggling for liberty, but by the nobles contending for power. It is not necessary to produce any evidence of the continuance and frequency of private wars under the successors of Philip the Fair. 9. A practice somewhat similar to the royal truce was intro- duced in order to strengthen and extend it. Bonds of assurance, or mutual security, were demanded from the parties at variance, by which they obliged themselves to abstain from all hostilities, either during a time mentioned in the bond, or for ever, and became subject to heavy penalties if they violated this obligation. These bonds were sometimes granted voluntarily, but more frequently exacted by the authority of the civil magistrate. Upon a petition from the party who felt himself weakest, the magistrate summoned his adversary to appear in court and obliged him to give him a bond of assurance. If, after that, he committed any further hostilities, he became subject to all the penalties of treason. This restraint on private war was known in the age of St. Louis. (Establissements, liv. i. c. 28.) It was frequent in Bretagne ; and, what is very remarkable, such bonds of assurance were given mutually between vassals and the lord of whom they held. Oliver de Clisson grants one to the duke of Bretagne, his sovereign. (Morice, Me'm. pour servir de Preuves a 1'Hist. de Bret., torn. i. p. 846, torn. ii. p. 371.) Many examples of bonds of assurance in other provinces of France are collected by Brussel (torn. iL p. 856). The nobles of Burgundy remonstrated against this practice, and obtained exemption from it as an encroachment on the privileges of their order. (Ordon., torn. i. p. 558.) This mode of security was first introduced into cities, and, the good effects of it having been felt there, was extended to the nobles. (See Note XVI.) 10. The calamities occasioned by private wars became at some times so intolerable that the nobles entered into voluntary associations, binding themselves to refer all matters in dispute, whether concerning civil property or points of honour to the determination of the majority of the associates. (Morice, Me'm. pour servir de Preuves a 1'Hist. de Bret., torn, ii p. 728.) 11. But all these expedients proving ineffectual, Charles VI., A.D. 1413, issued an ordinance expressly pro- hibiting private wars on any pretext whatsoever, with power to the judge ordinary to compel all persons to comply with this injunction, and to punish such as should prove refractory or disobedient, by imprisoning their persons, seizing their goods, and appointing the officers of justice, NOTE xxi.] PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 231 mcuiageurs et gasteurs, to live at free quarters on their estate. If those who were disobedient to this edict could not be personally arrested, he appointed their friends and vassals to be seized, and detained until they gave surety for keeping the peacp and he abolished all laws, customs, or privileges which might be pleaded in opposition to this ordinance. (Ordon., torn. x. p. 138.) How slow is the progress of reason and of civil order ! Regulations which to us appear so equitable, obvious, and simple required the efforts of civil and ecclesiastical authority, during several centuries, to introduce and establish them. Even posterior to this period, Louis XL was obliged to abolish private wars in Dauphind by a particular edict, A.D. 1451. Du Cange, Dissert., p. 348. This note would swell to a disproportionate bulk if I should attempt to inquire with the same minute attention into the progress of this per- nicious custom in the other countries of Europe. In England the ideas of the Saxons concerning personal revenge, the right of private wars, and the composition due to the party offended, seem to have been much the same with those which prevailed on the Continent. The law of Ina de vindicantibus, in the eighth century (Lamb., p. 3) ; those of Edmund in the tenth century, de homicidio (Lamb., p. 72), and de inimicitiis (p. 76) ; and those of Edward the Confessor, in the eleventh century, de temporibus et diebus pacw, or Treuga Dei (Lamb., p. 126), are perfectly similar to the ordonnances of the French kings their contemporaries. The laws of Edward, de pace regis, are still more explicit than those of the French monarchs, and, by several provisions in them, discover that a more perfect police was established in England at that period. (Lambard, p. 128, fol. vers.) Even after the Conquest, private wars, and the regulations for preventing them, were not altogether unknown, as appeal's from Madox, Formulare Anglicanum, No. CXLV., and from the extracts from Domes- day Book published by Gale, Scriptores Hist. Britan., pp. 759, 777. The well-known clause in the form of an English indictment, which, as an aggravation of the criminal's guilt, mentions his having assaulted a person who was in the peace of God and of the king, seems to be borrowed from the Treuga or Pax Dei, and the Pax Regis, which I have explained. But after the Conquest the mention of private wars among the uobility occurs more rarely in the English history than in that of any other European nation, and no laws concerning them are to be found in the body of their statutes. Such a change in their own manners, and such a variation from those of their neighbours, is remarkable. Is it to be ascribed to the extraordinary power that William the Norman acquired by right of conquest and transmitted to his successors, which rendered the execution of justice more vigorous and decisive, and the jurisdiction of the king's court more extensive, than under the monarchs on the Continent ? Or was it owing to the settlement of the Normans in England, who, having never adopted the practice of private war in their own country, abolished it in the kingdom which they conquered 1 It is asserted in an ordinance of John, king of France, that in all times jpast persons of eveiy rank in Normandy have been prohibited to "wage private war, and the practice has been deemed unlawful. (Ordon., torn. ii. p. 407.) If this fact were certain, it would go far towards explaining the peculiarity which I havo, mentioned. But, as there are some English acta 232 PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE xxi. of parliament which, according to the remark of the learned author of the Observations on the Statutes, chiefly the more Ancient, recite falsehoods, it may be added that this is not peculiar to the laws of that country. Notwith- standing the positive assertion contained in this public law of France, there is good reason for considering it as a statute which recites a falsehood. This, however, is not the place for discussing that point. It is an inquiry not unworthy the curiosity of an English antiquary. In Castile the pernicious practice of private war prevailed, and was authorized by the customs and law of the kingdom. (Leges Tauri, tit. 76, cum commentario Anton. Gomezii, p. 551.) As the Castilian nobles were no less turbulent than powerful, their quarrels and hostilities involved their country in many calamities. Innumerable proofs of this occur in Mariana. In Aragon the right of private revenge was likewise authorized by law, exercised in its full extent, and accompanied with the same unhappy consequences. (Hieron. Blunca, Comment, de Rebus Arag., ap. Schotti Hispan. illustrat, vol. iii. p. 733 ; Lex Jacobi I., A.r>. 1247 ; Fueros y Observancias del Reynode Aragon, lib. ix. p. 182.) Several confederacies between the kings of Aragon and their nobles for the restoring of peace, founded on the truce of God, are still extant. (Petr. de Marca, Marca, sive Limes Hispanic., App., 1303, 1388, 1428.) As early as the year 1165 we find a combination of the king and court of Aragon in order to abolish the right of private war and to punish those who presumed to claim that privilege. (Anales de Aragon, por Zurita, vol. i. p. 73.) But the evil was so inveterate that, as late as A.D. 1519, Charles V. was obliged to publish a law enforcing all former regulations tending to suppress this practice. Fueros y Observancias, lib. ix. 183, b. The Lombards, and other Northern nations who settled in Italy, intro duced the same maxims concerning the right of revenge into that country. and these were followed by the same effects. As the progress of the evil was perfectly similar to what happened in France, the expedients employed to check its career, or to extirpate it finally, resembled those which I have enumerated. Murat., Anliq. ItaL, vol. ii. p. 306, etc. In Germany the disorders and calamities occasioned by the right of private war were greater and more intolerable than in any other country of Europe. The imperial authority was so much shaken and enfeebled by the violence of the civil wars excited by the contests between the popes and the emperors of the Franconian and Suabian lines that not only the nobility but the cities acquired almost independent power and scorned all subordi- nation and obedience to the laws. The frequency of these faidce, or private wars, is often mentioned in the German annals, and the fatal effects of them are most pathetically described, Datt, de Pace Imper. Pub., lib. i. cap. 5, no, 30, et passim. The Germans early adopted the Treuga Dei, which was first established in France. This, however, proved but a tem- porary and ineffectual remedy. The disorders multiplied so fast and grew to be so enormous that they threatened the dissolution of society, and compelled the Germans to have recourse to the only remedy of the evil, namely, an absolute prohibition of private wars. The emperor William published his edict to this purpose, A.D. 1255, an hundred and sixty years previous to the ordinance of Charles VI. in France. (Datt., lib. i cap. 4, no. 20.) But neither he nor his successors had authority to secura xxii.j PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 2B3 the observance of it. This gave rise to a practice in Germany which con- veys to us a striking idea both of the intolerable calamities occasioned by private wars, and of the feebleness of government during the twelfth and thirteenth centuries. The cities and nobles entered into alliances and associations, by which they bound themselves to maintain the public peace and to make war on such as should violate it. This was the origin of the league of the Rhine, of Suabia, and of many smaller confederacies distinguished by various names. The rise, progress, and beneficial effects of these associations are traced by Datt with great accuracy. Whatever degree of public peace or of regular administration was preserved in the empire from the beginning of the twelfth century to the close of the fifteenth, Germany owes to these leagues. During that period, political order, respect for the laws, together with the equal administration of justice, made considerable progress in Germany. But the final and per- petual abolition of the right of private war was not accomplished until A.D. 1495. The imperial authority was by that time more firmly esta- blished, the ideas of men with respect to government and subordination were become more just. That barbarous and pernicious privilege of waging private war, which the nobles had so long possessed, was declared to be incompatible with the happiness and existence of society. In order to terminate any differences which might arise among the various mem- bers of the Germanic body, the Imperial Chamber was instituted with supreme jurisdiction, to judge without appeal in every question brought before it. That court has subsisted since that period, forming a very respectable tribunal of essential importance in the German constitution. Datt., lib. iii., iv., v. ; Pfeffel, AbregcS de 1'Histoire du Droit, etc., p. 556. NOTE XXII. Sect I. p. 55. It would be tedious and of little use to enumerate the various modes of appealing to the justice of God which superstition introduced during the ages of ignorance. I shall mention only one, because we have an account of it in a placitum, or trial, in the presence of Charlemagne, from which we may learn the imperfect manner in which justice was administered even during his reign. In the year 775 a contest arose between the bishop of Paris and the abbot of St. Denys concerning the property of a small abbey. Each of them exhibited deeds and records in order to prove the right to be in them. Instead of trying the authenticity or considering the ; import of these, the point was referred to the judicium crucis. Each pror- duced a person who, during the celebration of mass, stood before the cross with his arms expanded ; and he whose representative first became weary and altered his posture lost the cause. The person employed by the bishop on this occasion had less strength or less spirit than his adversary,, and the question was decided in favour of the abbot. (Mabillon, de Re Diplomat., lib. vi. p. 498.) If a prince so enlightened as Charlemagne countenanced such an absurd mode of decision, it is no wonder that other monarchs should tolerate it so long. M. de Montesquieu has treated of the trial by judicial combat at considerable length. The two talents which distinguish that illustrious author, industry in tracing all the circumstances of ancient and obscure institutions, and sagacity in penetrating into the 234 PEOOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE xxn. causes and principles which contributed to establish them, are equally conspicuous in his observations on this subject. To these I refer the reader, as they contain most of the principles by which I have endeavoured to explain this practice. (De 1'Esprit des Loix, liv. xxviii.) It seems to be probable, from the remarks of M. de Montesquieu, as well as from the facts produced by Muratori (torn. iii. Dissert. XXXVIII.), that appeals to the justice of God by the experiments with fire and water, etc., were frequent among the people who settled in the different provinces of the Roman empire, before they had recourse to the judicial combat ; and yet the judicial combat seems to have been the most ancient mode of cerminating any controversy among the barbarous nations in their original settlements. This is evident from Velleius Paterculus (lib. ii. c. 118), who informs us that all questions which were decided among the Romans by legal trial were terminated among the Germans by arms. The same thing appears in the ancient laws and customs of the Swedes, quoted by Jo. O. Stiernhook de Jure Sueonum et Gothorum vetusto, 4to, Holmise, 1682, lib. i. c. 7. It is probable that when the various tribes which invaded the empire were converted to Christianity their ancient custom of allowing judicial combats appeared so glaringly repugnant to the precepts of religion that for some time it was abolished, and by degrees several circumstances which I have mentioned led them to resume it. It seems likewise to be probable, from a law quoted by Stiernhook in the treatise which I have mentioned, that the judicial combat was originally permitted in order to determine points respecting the personal character or reputation of individuals, and was afterwards extended not only to criminal cases, but to questions concerning property. The words of the law are, " If any man shall say to another these reproachful words, ' You are not a man equal to other men,' or, ' You have not the heart of a man,' and the other shall reply, ' I am a man as good as you,' let them meet on the highway. If he who first gave off once appear, and the person offended absent himself, let the latter be deemed a worse man even than he was called ; let him not be admitted to give evidence in judgment either for man or woman, and let him not have the privilege of making a testament. If he who gave the offence be absent, and only the person offended appear, let him call upon the other thrice with a loud voice, and make a mark upon the earth, and then let him who absented himself be deemed in- famous, because he uttered words which he durst not support. If both shall appear properly armed, and the person offended shall fall in the combat, let a half compensation be paid for his death. But if the person who gave the offence shall fall, let it be imputed to his own rashness. The petulance of his tongue hath been fatal to him. Let him lie in the field without any compensation being demanded for his death." (Lex Uplandica, ap. Stiern., p. 76.) Martial people were extremely delicate with respect to every thing that affected their reputation as soldiers. By the law of the Salians, if any man called another a hare, or accused him of having left his shield in the field of battle, he was ordained to pay a large fine. (Leg. Sal., tit. xxxii. 4, 6.) By the law of the Lombards, if any one called another arga, i.e., a good-for-nothing fellow, he might immediately challenge him to combat. (Leg. Longob., lib. L tit. v. I.) By the law of the Salians, if one called another cenitus, a NOTE xxii.] PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 235 term of reproach equivalent to arga, he was bound to pay a very high fine. (Tit. xxxii. 1.) Paulus Diaconus relates the violent impression which this reproachful expression made upon one of his countrymen, and the fatal effects with which it was attended. (De Qestis Longobard, liv. vi. c. 34.) Thus the ideas concerning the point of honour, which we are apt to consider as a modern refinement, as well as the practice of duelling, to which it gave rise, are derived from the notions of our ancestors while in a state of society very little improved. As M. de Montesquieu's view of this subject did not lead him to con- sider every circumstance relative to judicial combats, I shall mention some particular facts necessary for the illustration of what I have said with respect to them. A remarkable instance occurs of the decision of an abstract point of law by combat. A question arose in the tenth century concerning the right of representation, which was not then fixed, though now universally established in every part of Europe. " It was a matter of doubt and dispute," saith the historian, " whether the sons of a son ought to be reckoned among the children of the family, and succeed equally with their uncles, if their father happen to die while their grandfather was alive. An assembly was called to deliberate on this point, and it was the general opinion that it ought to be remitted to the examination and decision of judges. But the emperor, following a better course, and desirous of dealing honourably with his people and nobles, appointed the matter to be decided by battle between two champions. He who appeared in behalf of the right of children to represent their deceased father was victori- ous ; and it was established, by a perpetual decree, that they should here- after share in the inheritance together with their uncles." (Wittikindus Corbiensis, lib. AnnaL, ap. M. de Lauriere, Prdf. Ordon., voL i. p. xxxiii.) If we can suppose the caprice of folly to lead men to any action more ex- travagant than this of settling a point in law by combat, it must be that of referring the truth or falsehood of a religious opinion to be decided in the same manner. To the disgrace of human reason, it has been capable even of this extravagance. A question was agitated in Spain in the eleventh century, whether the Musarabic liturgy and ritual which had been used in the churches of Spain, or that approved of by the see of Rome, which differed in many particulars from the other, contained the form of worship most acceptable to the Deity. The Spaniards contended zealously for the ritual of their ancestors. The popes urged them to receive that to which they had given their infallible sanction. A violent contest arose. The nobles proposed to decide the controversy by the sword. The king ap- proved of this method of decision. Two knights in complete armour entered the lists. John Ruys de Matanca, the champion of the Musarabic liturgy, was victorious. But the queen and archbishop of Toledo, who favoured the other form, insisted on having the matter submitted to another trial, and had interest enough to prevail in a request, inconsistent with the laws of combat, which being considered as an appeal to God, the decision ought to have been acquiesced in as final. A great fire was kindled. A copy of each liturgy was cast into the flames. It was agreed that the book which stood this proof and remained untouched should be received in all the churches of Spain. The Musarabic liturgy triumphed likewise in this trial, and, if we may believe Roderigo de Toledo, remained 236 PROOFS AND ILLUSTEATIONS. [NOTE xxn. unhurt by the fire when the other was reduced to ashes. The queen and archbishop had power or art sufficient to elude this decision also, and the use of the Musarabic form of devotion was permitted only in certain churches, a determination no less extraordinary than the whole trans* action. (Eoder. de Toledo, quoted by P. Orleans, Hist, des Revolutions d'Espagne, torn. i. p. 417 ; Mariana, lib. i. c. 18, vol. i p. 378.) A re- markable proof of the general use of trial by combat, and of the predilec- tion for that mode of decision, occurs in the laws of the Lombards. It was a custom in the Middle Ages that any person might signify publicly the law to which he chose to be subjected ; and by the prescriptions of that law he was obliged to regulate his transactions, without being bound to comply with any practice authorized by other codes of law. Persons who had subjected themselves to the Roman law, and adhered to the ancient jurisprudence, as far as any knowledge of it was retained in those ages of ignorance, were exempted from paying any regard to the forms of pro- ceedings established by the laws of the Burgundians, Lombards, and other barbarous people. But the emperor Otho, in direct contradiction to this received maxim, ordained " That all persons, under whatever law they lived, even although it were the Roman law, should be bound to conform to the edicts concerning the trial by combat." (Leg. Longob., lib. ii. tit. 55, 38.) While the trial by judicial combat subsisted, proof by charters, contracts, or other deeds became ineffectual ; and even this species of written evidence, calculated to render the proceedings of courts certain and decisive, was eluded. When a charter or other instrument was pro- duced by one of the parties, his opponent might challenge it, affirm that it was false and forged, and offer to prove this by combat. (Leg. Longob., ibid., 34.) It is true that, among the reasons enumerated by Beaumanoir on account of which judges might refuse to permit a trial by combat, one is, " If the point in contest can be clearly proved or ascertained by other evidence." (Coust. de Beauv., ch. 63, p. 323.) But that regula- tion removed the evil only a single step. For the party who suspected that a witness was about to depose in a manner unfavourable to his cause might accuse him of being suborned, give him the lie, and challenge him to combat ; if the witness was vanquished in battle, no other evidence could be admitted, and the party by whom he was summoned to appear lost his cause. (Leg. Baivar., tit. 16, 2 ; Leg. Burgund. tit. 45 ; Beau- man., ch. 61, p. 315.) The reason given for obliging a witness to accept of a defiance, and to defend himself by combat, is remarkable, and con- tains the same idea which is still the foundation of what is called the point of honour : " for it is just that if any one affirms that he perfectly knows the truth of anything, and offers to give oath upon it, he should not hesitate to maintain the veracity of his affirmation in combat." Leg. Burgund., tit. 45. That the trial by judicial combat was established in every country of Europe is a fact well known, and requires no proof. That this mode of decision was frequent appears not only from the codes of ancient laws which established it, but from the earliest writers concerning the practice of law in the different nations of Europe. They treat of this custom at great length ; they enumerate the regulations concerning it with minute accuracy and explain them with much solicitude. It made a capital and extensive NOTE xxii.] PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 237 article in jurisprudence. There is not any one subject in their system ol law which Beaunianoir, Defontaines, or the compilers of the Assizes de Jerusalem seem to have considered as of greater importance ; and none upon which they have bestowed so much attention. The same observation will hold with respect to the early authors of other nations. It appears from Madox that trials of this kind were so frequent in England that fines paid on these occasions made no inconsiderable branch of the king's revenue. (Hist, of the Excheq., vol. i. p. 349.) A very curious account of a judi- cial combat between Messire Robert de Beaunianoir and Messire Pierre Tournemine, in presence of the duke of Bretngne, A.D. 1385, is published by Morice (Me'in. pour servir de Preuves a 1'Hist. de Bretugne, torn. ii. p. 498.) All the formalities observed in such extraordinary proceedings are there described more minutely than in any ancient monument which I have had an opportunity of considering. Tournemine was accused by Beaumanoir of having murdered his brother. The former was vanquished, but was saved from being hanged upon the spot by the generous interces- sion of his antagonist. A good account of the origin of the laws concerning judicial combat is published in the History of Pavia, by Bernardo Sacci, lib. ix. c. 8, in Graev. Thes. Antiquit. Ital., vol. iii. p. 743. This mode of trial was so acceptable that ecclesiastics, notwithstanding the prohibitions of the Church, were constrained not only to connive at the practice, but to authorize it. A remarkable instance of this is produced 'by Pasquier, Recherches, lib. iv. ch. i. p. 350. The abbot Wittikindus, whose words I have produced* in this note, considered the determination of a point in law by combat as the best and most honourable mode of decision. In the year 978 a judicial combat was fought in the presence of the emperor. The archbishop Aldebert advised him to terminate a contest which had arisen between two noblemen of his court by this mode of decision. The vanquished combatant, though a person of high rank, was beheaded on the spot. (Chronic. Ditmari, Episc. Mersb., apud Bouquet, Recueil des Hist., torn. x. p. 121.) Questions concerning the property of churches and monasteries were decided by combat. In the year 961 a controversy con- cerning the church of St. MeMard, whether it belonged to the abbey of Beaulieu or not, was terminated by judicial combat. (Bouquet, Recueil des Hist., torn. ix. p. 729; ibid., p. 612, etc.) The emperor Henry I. declares that this law, authorizing the practice of judicial combats, was enacted with consent and applause of many faithful bishops. (Ibid., p. 231.) So remarkably did the martial ideas of those ages prevail over the genius and maxims of the canon law, which in other instances was in the highest credit and authority with ecclesiastics. A judicial combat was appointed in Spain, by Charles V., A.D. 1522. The combatants fought in the emperor's presence, and the battle was conducted with all the rites prescribed by the ancient laws of chivalry. The whole transaction is described at great length by Pontus Heuterus, Rer. Austriac., lib. viii. c. 17, p. 205. The last instance which occurs in the history of France of a judicial combat authorized by the magistrate was the famous one between M. Jarnac and M. de la Chaistaignerie, A.D. 1547. A trial by combat was appointed in England, A.D. 1571, under the inspection of the judges in the Court of Common Pleas ; and though it was not carried to the same extremity 238 PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE xxm. with the former, Queen Elizabeth having interposed her authority and enjoined the parties to compound the matter, yet, in order to preserve their honour, the lists were marked out, and all the forms previous to the combat were observed with much ceremony. (Spehn., Gloss., voc. Campus, p. 103.) In the year 1631 a judicial combat was appointed between Donald Lord Rea and David Ramsay, Esq., by the authority of the lord high constable and earl marshal of England ; but that quarrel likewise terminated without bloodshed, being accommodated by Charles I. Another instance occurs seven years later. Rushworth, in Observations on the Sta- tutes, etc., p. 266. NOTE XXIII. Sect. I. p. 60. The text contains the great outlines which mark the course of private and public jurisdiction in the several nations of Europe. I shall here follow more minutely the various steps of this progress, as the mat- ter is curious and important enough to merit this attention. The payment of a fine by way of satisfaction to the person or family injured was the first device of a rude people in order to check the career of private resentment, and to extinguish those faidce, or deadly feuds, which were prosecuted among them with the utmost violence. This custom may be traced back to the ancient Germans (Tacit., de Morib. Germ., c. 21), and prevailed among other uncivilised nations. Many examples of this are collected by the ingenious and learned author of Historical Law Tracts (vol. i. p. 41). These fines were ascertained and levied in three different manners. At first they were settled by voluntary agreement between the parties at variance. When their rage began to subside, and they felt the bad effects of their continuing in enmity, they came to terms of concord, and the satisfaction made was called a composition, implying that it was fixed by mutual consent. (De 1'Esprit des Loix, liv. xxx. c. 19.) It is appa- rent from some of the more ancient codes of laws that at the time when these were compiled matters still remained in that simple state. In certain cases the person who had committed an offence was left exposed to the resentment of those whom he had injured, until he should recover their favour., " quoquo modo potuerit." (Leg. Frision., tit. 11, 1.) The next mode of levying these fines was by the sentence of arbiters. An arbiter is called in the Regiam Majestatem amicabilis compositor (lib. xi. c. 4, 10.) He could estimate the degree of offence with more impartiality than the parties interested, and determine with greater equity what satisfaction ought to be demanded. It is difficult to bring an authentic proof of a custom previous to the records preserved in any nation of Europe. But one of the Formulae Andegavenses compiled in the sixth century seems to allude to a transaction carried on, not by the authority of a judge, but by the mediation of arbiters chosen by mutual consent. (Bouquet, Recueil des Histor., torn. iv. p. 566.) But, as an arbiter wanted authority to enforce his decisions, judges were appointed with compulsive power to oblige both parties to acquiesce in their decisions. Previous to this last step, the expe- dient of paying compositions was an imperfect remedy against the perni- cious effects of private resentment. As soon as this important change was introduced, the magistrate, putting himself in place of the person injured, NOTE xxni.] PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 239 ascertained the composition with which he ought to rest satisfied. Every possible injury that could occur in the intercourse of civil society was con- sidered, and estimated, and the compositions due to the persons aggrieved were fixed with such minute attention as discovers, in most cases, amazing discernment and delicacy, in some instances unaccountable caprice. Besides the composition payable to the private party, a certain sum, called a fredum, was paid to the king or state, as Tacitus expresses it, or to the fiscun. in the language of the barbarous laws. Some authors, blending the refined ideas of modem policy with their reasonings concerning ancient transactions, have imagined that the fredum was a compensation due to the community on account of the violation of the public peace. But it is manifestly nothing more than the price paid to the magistrates for the protection which he afforded against the violence of resentment. The enacting of this was a considerable step towards improvement in criminal jurisprudence. In some of the more ancient codes of laws the freda are altogether omitted, or so seldom mentioned that it is evident they were but little known. In the latter codes the fredum is as precisely specified as the composition. In common cases it was equal to the third part of the composition. (Capitul., vol. i. p. 52.) In some extraordinary cases, where it was more difficult to protect the person who had committed violence, the fredum was augmented. (Capitul., vol. i. p. 515.) These freda made a considerable branch in the revenues of the barons ; and in whatever district territorial jurisdiction was granted, the royal judges were prohibited from levying any freda. In explaining the nature of the fredum, I have followed in a great measure the opinion of M. de Montesquieu, though I know that several learned anti- quaries have taken the word in a different sense. (De 1'Esprit des Loix, liv. xxx. c. 20, etc.) The great object of judges was to compel the one party to give, and the other to accept, the satisfaction prescribed. They multiplied regulations to this purpose, and enforced them by grievous penalties. (Leg. Longob., lib. i. tit. 9, 34; ibid., tit. 37, 1, 2; Capitul., voL i. p. 371, 22.) The person who received a composition was obliged to cease from all further hostility, and to confirm his recon- ciliation with the adverse party by an oath. (Leg. Longob., lib. i tit. 9, 8.) As an additional and more permanent evidence of reconciliation, he was required to grant a bond of security to the person from whom he received a composition, absolving him from all further prosecution. Mar- culfus, and the other collectors of ancient writs, have preserved several different forms of such bonds. (Marc., lib. xi. 18; Append., 23; Form. Sirmondicae, 39.) The letters of Slanes, known in the law of Scotland, are perfectly similar to these bonds of security. By the letters of Slanes, the heirs and relations of a person who had been murdered bound themselves, in consideration of an assythment, or composition paid to them, to forgive, "pass over, and forever forget, and in oblivion inter, all rancour, malice, revenge, prejudice, grudge, and resentment that they have or may conceive against the aggressor or his posterity, for the crime which he had committed, and discharge him of all action, civil or criminal, against him or his estate, for now and ever." (System of Stiles, by Dallas of St. Martin's, p. 862.) In the ancient form of letters of Slanes, the pri- vate jarty not only forgives and forgets, but pardons and grants remission of the crime. This practice Dallas, reasoning according to the principle* 240 PBOOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE xxm. of his own age, considers as an encroachment on the rights of sovereignty, as none, says he, could pardon a criminal but the king. (Ibid.) But in early and rude times the prosecution, the punishment, and the pardon of criminals were all deeds of the private person who was injured. Madox has published two writs, one in the reign of Edward I., the other in the reign of Edward III., by which private persons grant a release or pardon of all trespasses, felonies, robberies, and murders committed. (FonuuL Anglican., no. 702, 705.) In the last of these instruments, some regard seems to be paid to the rights of the sovereign, for the pardon is granted en quant que en nous est. Even after the authority of the magistrate was interposed in punishing crimes, the punishment of criminals is long con- sidered chiefly as a gratification to the resentment of the persons who have been injured. In Persia a murderer is still delivered to the relations of the person whom he has slain, who put him to death with their own hands. If they refuse to accept of a sum of money as a compensation, the sovereign, absolute as he is, cannot pardon the murderer. (Voyages de Chardin, iii. 417, edit. 1735, 4to ; Voyages de Tavernier, liv. v. c. 5, 10.) Among the Arabians, though one of the first polished people in the East, the same custom still subsists. (Description de 1'Arabie, par M. Niebuhr, p. 28.) By a law in the kingdom of Aragon as late as the year 1564, the punishment of one condemned to death cannot be mitigated but by consent of the parties who have been injured. Fueros y Observancias del Reyno de Aragon, p. 204, 6. If, after all the engagements to cease from enmity which I have men- tioned, any person renewed hostilities, and was guilty of any violence, either towards the person from whom he had received a composition, or towards his relations and heirs, this was deemed a most heinous crime, and punished with extraordinary rigour. It was an act of direct rebellion against the authority of the magistrate, and was repressed by the interpo- sition of all his power. (Leg. Longob., lib. i. tit. 9, 8, p. 34 ; Capit., vol. L p. 371, 22.) Thus the avenging of injuries was taken out of private hands, a legal composition was established, and peace and amity were restored under the inspection and by the authority of a judge. It is evident that at the time when the barbarians settled in the provinces of the Roman empire they had fixed judges established among them with compul- sive authority. Persons vested with this character are mentioned by the earliest historians. (Du Cange, voc. Judices.) The right of territorial jurisdiction was not altogether an usurpation of the feudal barons, or an invasion of the prerogative of the sovereign. There is good reason to believe that the powerful leaders who seized different districts of the coun- tries which they conquered, and kept possession of them as allodial property, assumed from the beginning the right of jurisdiction, and exercised it within their own territories. This jurisdiction was supreme, and extended to all causes. The clearest proofs of this are produced by M. Bouquet, Le Droit publique de France e'clairci, etc., torn. i. p. 206, etc. The privilege of judging his own vassals appears to haye been originally a right inherent in every baron who held a fief. As far back as the archives of nations can conduct us with any certainty, we find the jurisdiction and fief united. One of the earliest charters to a layman which I have met with is that of Ludovicus Pius, A.D. 814 ; and it contains the right of territorial jurisdic- VOTE XXIIL] PHOOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. tion in the most express and extensive terms. (Capital., voL ii. p. 1405.) There are many charters to churches and monasteries of a more early date, containing grants of similar jurisdiction, and prohibiting any royal judge to enter the territories of those churches or monasteries or to perform any act of judicial authority there. (Bouquet, Recueil des Hist, torn. iv. pp. 628, 631, 633, torn. v. pp. 703, 710, 752, 762.) Muratori has published many very ancient charters containing the same immunities. (Antiq. Ital., Dissert. LXX.) In most of these deeds the royal judge is prohibited from exacting the freda due to the possessor of territorial jurisdiction, which shows that they constituted a valuable part of the revenue of each superior lord at that juncture. The expense of obtaining a sentence in a court of justice during the Middle Ages was so considerable that this circumstance alone was sufficient to render men unwilling to decide any contest in judicial form. It appears from a charter in the thirteenth century that the baron who had the right of justice received the fifth part of the value of every subject the property of which was tried and determined in his court. If after the commencement of a lawsuit the parties terminated the contest in an amicable manner, or by arbitration, they were nevertheless bound to pay the fifth part of the subject contested to the court before which the suit had been brought. (Hist, de Dauphins', Geneve, 1722, torn. i. p. 22.) Similar to this is a regulation in the charter of liberty granted to the town of Friburg, A.D. 1120. If two of the citizens shall quarrel, and if one of them shall complain to the superior lord or to his judge, and after com- mencing the suit shall be privately reconciled to his adversary, the judge, if he does not approve of this reconciliation, may compel him to go on with his lawsuit, and all who were present at the reconciliation shall forfeit the favour of the superior lord. Historia Zaringo-Badensis,' Auctor. Jo. Dan. Schoepflinus, Carolsr., 1765, 4to, vol. v. p. 55. What was the extent of that jurisdiction which those who held fiefs possessed originally we cannot now determine with certainty. It is evident that during the disorders which prevailed in every kingdom of Europe the great vassals took advantage of the feebleness of their monarchs and enlarged their jurisdictions to the utmost. As early as the tenth century the more powerful barons had usurped the right of deciding all causes, whether civil or criminal. They had acqxured the high justice as well as the low. (Establ. de St. Louis, liv. i. c. 24, 25.) Their sentences were final, and there lay no appeal from them to any superior court. Several striking instances of this are collected by Brussel (Traite des Fiefs, liv. iii. c. 11 ? 12, 13). Not satisfied with this, the more potent barons got their territories created into regalities, with almost every royal prerogative and jurisdiction. Instances of these were frequent in France. (Bruss., ibid.) In Scotland, where the power of the feudal nobles became exorbitant, they were very numerous (Historical Law Tracts, voL i. tract vi.) Even in England, though the authority of the Norman kings circumscribed the jurisdiction of the barons within more narrow limits than in any other feudal kingdom, several counties palatine were erected, into which the king's judges could not enter, and no writ could come in the king's name until it received the seal of the county palatine. (Spelman, Gloss., voc. Comites Palatini ; Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England, vol. iii. p. 78.) VOL. I. * 242 PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE xxm. These lords of regalities had a right to claim or rescue their vassals from the king's judges, if they assumed any jurisdiction over them. (Brussel, ubi supra.) In the law of Scotland, this privilege was termed the right of repledging ; and the frequency of it not only interrupted the course of justice, but gave rise to great disorders in the exercise of it. (Hist. Law Tracts, ibid.) The jurisdiction of the counties palatine seems to have been productive of like inconveniences in England. The remedies provided by princes against the bad effects of these usurpations of the nobles, or inconsiderate grants of the crown, were various and gradually applied. Under Charlemagne and his immediate descendants, the regal prerogative still retained great vigour, and the duces, comites, and missi dominici, the former of whom were ordinary and fixed judges, the latter extraordinary and itinerant judges, in the different provinces of their extensive dominions, exercised a jurisdiction co-ordinate with the barons in some cases, and superior to them in others. (Du Cange, voc. Dux, Comites, et Missi; Murat, Antiq., Dissert. VIII. et IX.) But under the feeble race of monarchs who succeeded them, the authority of the royal judges declined, and the barons acquired that unlimited jurisdiction which has been described. Louis VI. of France attempted to revive the function of the missi dominici, under the title of juges des exempts, but the barons were become too powerful to bear such an encroachment on their jurisdiction, and he was obliged to desist from employing them. (Hainault, Abre'ge' Chron., torn. ii. p. 730.) His successor (as has been observed) had recourse to expedients less alarming. The appeal de defaute de droit, or on account of the refusal of justice, was the first which was attended with any considerable effect. According to the maxims of feudal law, if a baron had not as many vassals as enabled him to try by their peers the parties who offered to plead in his court, or if he delayed or refused to proceed in the trial, the cause might be carried, by appeal, to the court of the superior lord of whom the baron held, and tried there. (De 1'Esprit des Loix, liv. xxviii. c. 28 ; Du Cange, voc. Defectus Justitice.) The number of peers or assessors in the courts of barons was frequently very considerable. It appears from a criminal trial in the court of the Viscount de Lautrec, A.D. 1299, that upwards of two hundred persons were present, and assisted in the trial, and voted in passing judgment (Hist, de Langued., par D. D. de Vic et Vaisette, torn, iv., Preuves, p. 114.) But, as the right of jurisdiction had been usurped by many inconsiderable barons, they were often unable to hold courts. This gave frequent occasion to such appeals, and rendered the practice familiar. By degrees, such appeals began to be made frou the courts of the more powerful barons ; and it is evident from a decision recorded by Brussel that the royal judges were willing to give countenance to any pretext for them. (Traite' des Fiefs, torn. i. pp. 235, 261.) This species of appeal had less effect in abridging the jurisdiction of the nobles than the appeal on account of the injustice of the sentence. When the feudal monarchs were powerful and their judges possessed extensive authority, such appeals seem to have been frequent. (Capitul., vol. i pp. 175, 180.) And they were made in a manner suitable to the rude- ness of a simple age. The persons aggrieved resorted to the palace of their sovereign and with outcries and loud noise called V him for redress. NOTE xxn i. j PROOP& AND ILLUSTEATIONS. 243 (Capital., lib. iii. c. 59 ; Chronic. Lawterbergiense, ap. Mencken., Script. German., vol. ii p. 284, b.) In the kingdom of Aragon, the appeals to the justiza, or supreme judge, were taken in such a form as supposed the appellant to be in immediate danger of death or of some violent outrage : he rushed into the presence of the judge, crying with a loud voice, Aw, Am, Fuerm, Fuerza, thus imploring (as it were) the instant interposition of that supreme judge in order to save him. (Hier. Blanca, Comment, de Rebus Aragon., ap. Script. Hispanic., Pistorii, vol. iii. p. 753.) The abolition of the trial by combat facilitated the revival of appeals of this kind. The effects of the subordination which appeals established, in introducing attention, equity, and consistency of decision into courts of judicature, were soon conspicuous ; and almost all causes of importance were carried to be finally determined in the king's courts. (Brussel, torn. i. p. 252.) Various circumstances which contributed towards the introduction and frequency of such appeals are enumerated De 1'Esprit des Loix, liv. xxviii. c. 27. Nothing, however, was of such effect as the attention which monarchs gave to the constitution and dignity of their courts of justice. It was the ancient custom for the feudal monarchs to preside themselves in their courts, and to administer justice in person. (Marculf., lib. i. 25 ; Murat, Dissert. XXXI.) Charlemagne, whilst he was dressing, used to call parties into his presence, and, having heard and considered the subject of litigation, gave judgment concerning it. (Eginhartus, Vita Caroli Magni, cited by Madox, Hist, of Exchequer, vol. i. p. 91.) This trial and decision of causes by the sovereigns them- selves could not fail of rendering their courts respectable. St. Louis, who encouraged to the utmost the practice of appeals, revived this ancient custom, and administered justice in person with all the ancient simplicity. " I have often seen the saint," says Joinville, " sit under the shade of an oak in the wood of Vincennes, when all who had any complaint freely approached him. At other times he gave orders to spread a carpet in a garden, and, seating himself upon it, heard the causes that were brought before him." (Hist, de St. Louis, p. 13, edit. 1761.) Princes of inferior rank, who possessed the right of justice, sometimes dispensed it in person, and presided in theif tribunals. Two instances of this occur with respect to the dauphins of Vienne. (Hist, de Dauphin^, torn. i. p. 18. torn. ii. p. 257.) But as kings and princes could not decide every cause in person, nor bring them all to be determined in the same court, they appointed baillis, with a right of jurisdiction, in different districts of their kingdom. These possessed powers somewhat similar to those of the ancient comites. It was towards the end of the twelfth century and beginning of the thirteenth that this office was first instituted in France. (Brussel, liv. ii. c. 35.) When the king had a court established in different quarters of his dominions, this invited his subjects to have recourse to it. It was the private interest of the baillis, as well as an object of public policy, to extend their jurisdiction. They took advantage of every defect in the rights of the barons, and of every error in their proceedings, to remove causes out of their courts, and to bring them under their own cognizance. There was a distinction in the feudal law, and an extremely ancient one, between the high justice and the low. (CapituL 3, A.D. 812, 4, A.D. 815, 3; Establ. de St. Louis, liv. i c. 40.) Many R 2 244 PEOOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE xxin. barons possessed the latter jurisdiction who had no title to the former. The former included the right of trying crimes of every kind, even the highest ; the latter was confined to petty trespasses. This furnished endless pretexts for obstructing, restraining, and reviewing the proceed ings in the baron courts. (Ordon., ii. 457, 25 ; 458, 29.) A regulation of greater importance succeeded the institution of baillis. The king's supreme court or parliament was rendered fixed as to the place and constant as to the time of its meetings. In France, as well as in the other feudal kingdoms, the king's court of justice was originally ambu- latory, followed the person of the monarch, and was held only during some of the great festivals. Philip Augustus, A.D. 1305, rendered it stationary at Paris, and continued its terms during the greater part of the year. (Pasquier, Recherches, liv. ii. c. 2 et 3, etc. ; Ordon., torn, i p. 366, 62.) He and his successors vested extensive powers in that court ; they granted the members of it several privileges and distinctions which it would be tedious to enumerate. (Pasquier, ibid. ; Velly, Hist, de France, torn. vii. p. 307.) Persons eminent for integrity and skill in law were appointed judges there. (Ibid.) By degrees the final decision of all causes of importance was brought into the parliament of Paris, and the other parliaments which administered justice in the king's name, in different provinces of the kingdom. This jurisdiction, however, the parliament of Paris acquired very slowly, and the great vassals of the crown made violent efforts in order to obstruct the attempts of that parliament to extend its authority. Towards the close of the thirteenth century, Philip the Fair was obliged to prohibit his parliament from taking cognizance of certain appeals brought into it from the courts of the count of Bretagne, and to recognize and respect his right of supreme and final jurisdiction. (Me*moires pour servir de Preuves a 1'Histoire de Bretagne, par Morice, torn. i. pp. 1037, 1074.) Charles VI., at the end of the following century, was obliged to confirm the rights of the dukes of Bretagne in still more ample form. (Ibid., torn. ii. pp. 580, 581.) So violent was the opposition of the barons to this right of appeal, which they considered as fatal to their privileges and power, that the authors of the Encycloptdie have mentioned several instances in which barons put to death or mutilated such persons as ventured to appeal from the sentences pronounced in their courts to the parliament of Paris (torn, xii., art. Parlement, p. 25). The progress of jurisdiction in the other feudal kingdoms was in a great measure similar to that which we have traced in France. In England the territorial jurisdiction of the barons was both ancient and extensive. (Leg. Edw. Conf., nos. 5 and 9.) After the Norman Conquest it became more strictly feudal ; and it is evident from facts recorded in the English history, as well as from the institution of counties paatine, which I have already mentioned, that the usurpations of the nobes in England were not less bold or extensive than those of their contemporaries on the continent. The same expedients were employed to circumscribe or abolish those dangerous jurisdictions. William the Conqueror established a constant court in the hall of his palace ; from which the four courts now intrusted with the administration of justice in England took their rise. Henry II. divided his kingdom into six circuits, and sent itinerant xxiv.] PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 245 judges to hold their courts in them at stated seasons. (Blackstone's Com- mentaries on the Laws of England, voL iii p. 57.) Jiistices of the peace were appointed in every county by subsequent monarch*, to whose juris- diction the people gradually had recourse in many civil causes. The privileges of the counties palatine were gradually limited ; with respect to some points they were abolished, and the administration of justice was brought into the king's courts, or before judges of his appointment The several steps taken for this purpose are enumerated in Dalrymple'a History of Feudal Property, chap. vii. In Scotland the usurpations of the nobility were more exorbitant than in any other feudal kingdom. The progress of their encroachments, and the methods taken by the crown to limit or abolish their territorial and independent jurisdictions, both which I had occasion to consider and explain in a former work, differed very little from those of which I have now given the detail History of Scotland, vol. L p. 37. I should perplex myself and my readers in the labyrinth of German jurisprudence if I were to attempt to delineate the progress of jurisdiction in the empire with a minute accuracy. It is sufficient to observe that the authority which the aulic council and imperial chamber now possess took its rise from the same desire of redressing the abuses of territorial jurisdic- tion, and was acquired in the same manner that the royal courts attained influence in other countries of Europe. All the important facts with respect to both these particulars may be found in Phil. Datt. de Pace Publica Imperii, lib. iv. The capital articles are pointed out in Pfeffel, Abre'ge' de 1'Histoire du Droit publique d'Allemagne, pp. 556, 581 ; and in Trait^ du Droit publique de 1'Empire, par M. le Coq de Villeray. The two last treatises are of great authority, having been composed under the eye of M. Schoepflin of Strasburg, one of the ablest public lawyers in Germany. NOTE XXIV. Sect L p. 63. It ia not easy to fix with precision the period at which ecclesiastics first began to claim exemption from the civil jurisdiction. It is certain that during the early and purest ages of the Church they pretended to no such immunity. The authority of the civil magistrate extended to all persons and to all causes. This fact has not only been clearly established by Protestant authors, but is admitted by many Roman Catholics of eminence, and particularly by the writers in defence of the liberties of the Gallican Church. There are several original papers published by Muratori, which show that in the ninth and tenth centuries causes of the greatest importance relating to ecclesiastics were still determined by civil judges. (Antiq. ItaL, vol. v. Dissert LXX.) Proofs of this are produced likewise by M. Houard (Anciennes Lois des Fra^ois, etc., voL i. p. 209.) Ecclesiastics did not shake off all at once their subjection to civil courts. This privilege, like their other usurpations, was acquired slowly, and Btep by step. This exemption seems at first to have been merely an act of complaisance, flowing from veneration for their character. Thus, from a charter of Charlemagne in favour of the church of Mans, A.D. 796. to which M. I'Abbe' de Foy refers in his Notice de Diplomes, torn L, 246 PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE xxiv. p. 201, that monarch directs Ids judges, if any difference should arise between the administrators of the revenues of that church and any person whatever, not to summon the administrators to appear in " mallo publico," but first of all to meet with them, and to endeavour to accommodate the iifterence in an amicable manner. This indulgence was in process of time improved into a legal exemption ; which was founded on the same superstitious respect of the laity for the clerical character and function. A remarkable instance of this occurs in a charter of Frederic Barbarossa, A.D. 1172, to the monastery of Altenburg. He grants them "judicium non tantum sanguinolentis plagae, sed vitae et mortis ;" he prohibits any of the royal judges from disturbing their jurisdiction ; and the reason which he gives for this ample concession is, " nam quorum, ex Dei gratia, ratione divini ministerii onus leve est, et jugum suave ; nos penitus nolumus illos oppressionis contumelia, vel manu laica, fatigari." Mencken, Script. Rer. Germ., vol. iii. p. 1067. It is not necessary for illustrating what is contained in the text, that I should describe the manner in which the code of the canon law was compiled, or show that the doctrines in it most favourable to the power of the clergy are founded on ignorance, or supported by fraud and forgery. The reader will find a full account of these in Gerard, van Mastricht, His- toria Juris Ecclesiastici, and in Science du Gouvernement, par M. Rdal, torn. vii. c. 1 et 3, 2, 3, etc. The history of the progress and extent of ecclesiastical jurisdiction, with an account of the arts which the clergy employed in order to draw causes of every kind into the spiritual courts, is no less curious, and would throw great light upon many of the customs and institutions of the Dark Ages ; but it is likewise foreign from the pre- sent subject. Du Cange, in his Glossary, voc. Curia Christianitatis, has collected most of the causes with respect to which the clergy arrogated an exclusive jurisdiction, and refers to the authors, or original papers, which confirm his observations. Giannone, in his Civil History of Naples, lib. xix. 3, has ranged these under proper heads, and scrutinizes the preten- sions of the Church with his usual boldness and discernment. M. Fleury observes that the clergy multiplied the pretexts for extending the authority of the spiritual courts with so much boldness that it was soon in their power to withdraw almost every person and every cause from the jurisdic- tion of the civil magistrate. (Hist. Eccle's., torn, xix., Disc. Prelim., 16.) But, how ill founded soever the jurisdiction of the clergy may have been, or whatever might be the abuses to which their manner of exercising it gave rise, the principles and forms of their jurisprudence were far more perfect than that which was known in the civil courts. It seems to be certain that ecclesiastics never submitted, during any period in th= Middle Ages, to the laws contained in the codes of the barbarous nations, but were governed entirely by the Roman law. They regulated all their transac- tions by such of its maxims as were preserved by tradition or were con- tained in the Theodosian Code and other books extant among them. This we learn from a custom which prevailed universally in those ages. Every person was permitted to choose, among the various codes of laws then in force, that to which he was willing to conform. In any transaction of import- ance, it was usual for the persons contracting to mention the law to which they submitted that it might be known how any controversy that should NOTE xxnr.] PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 247 arise between them was to be decided. Innumerable proofs of this occui in the charters of the Middle Ages. But the clergy considered it as such a valuable privilege of their order to be governed by the Roman law, that when any person entered into holy orders it was usual for him to renounce the code of laws to which he had been formerly subject, and to declare that he now submitted to the Roman law. " Constat me Johannem clericum, filium quondam Verandi, qui professus sum, ex natione mea, lege vivere Longobardorum, sed tamen, pro honore ecclesiastico, lege nunc videor vivere Romana." (Charta, A.D. 1072.) " Farulfus presbyter qui pro- fessus sum, more sacerdotii mei, lege vivere Romana." Charta, A.D. 107&; Muratori, Antichita Estensi, vol. i. p. 78. See likewise Houard. Anciennes Loix des Franois, etc., vol. i. p. 203. The code of the canon law began to be compiled early in the ninth century. (Mem. de 1'Acad. des Inscript, torn, xviii. p. 346, etc.) It was above two centuries after that before any collection was made of those customs which were the rule of judgments in the courts of the barons. Spiritual judges decided, of course, according to written and known laws : lay judges, left without any fixed guide, were directed by loose traditionary customs. But, besides this general advantage of the canon law, its forms and principles were more consonant to reason, and more favourable to the equitable decision of every point in controversy, than those which prevailed in lay courts. It appears from notes XXI. and XXIII., concerning private wars and the trial by combat, that the whole spirit of ecclesiastical juris- prudence was adverse to those sanguinary customs, which were destructive of justice ; and the whole force of ecclesiastical authority was exerted to abolish them, and to substitute trials by law and evidence in their room. Almost all the forms in lay courts which contribute to establish and con- tinue to preserve order in judicial proceedings are borrowed from the canon law. (Fleury, Instit. du Droit Canon., part iii. c. 6, p. 52.) St. Louis, in his Establissemens, confirms many of his new regulations concerning property and the administration of justice by the authority of the canon law, from which he borrowed them. Thus, for instance, the first hint of attaching movables for the recovery of a debt was taken from the canon law, (Estab., ^v. ii. c. 21 et 40.) And likewise the cessio bonorum, by a person wio was insolvent. (Ibid.) In the same manner, he estab- lished new regulations with respect to the effects of persons dying intestate (liv. i. c. 89). These and many other salutary regulations the canonists had borrowed from the Roman law. Many other examples might be pro- duced of more perfect jurisprudence in the canon law than was known in lay courts. For that reason it was deemed a high privilege to be subject to ecclesiastical jurisdiction. Among the many immunities by which men were allured to engage in the dangeroiis expeditions for the recovery of the Holy Land, one of the most considerable was the declaring such as tooi. the cross to be subject only to the spiritual courts, and to the rules of decision observed in them. See Note XIIL, and Du Cange, voc. Crutit 248 PBOOFS AND ILLUSTKAT10NS. [NOTE xxv. NOTE XXV. Sect I. p. 65. The rapidity with which the knowledge and study of the Roman law spread over Europe is amazing. The copy of the Pandects was found 4t Amalfi, A.D. 1137. Irnerius opened a college of civil law at Bologna a. few years after. (Giann., Hist., book xi. c. 2.) It began to be taught as a part of academical learning in different parts of France before the middle of the century. Vaccarius gave lectures on the civil law at Oxford as early as the year 1147. A regular system of feudal law, formed plainly in imitation of the Roman code, was composed by two Milanese lawyers about the year 1150. Gratian published the code of canon law, with large additions and emendations, about the same time. The earliest collection of those customs which served as the rules of decision in the courts of justice is the Assises de Jerusalem. They were compiled, as the preamble informs us, in the year 1099, and are called "Jus Consuetudinarium quo regebatur Regnum Orientale." (Willerm. Tyr., lib. xix. c. 2.) But pecu- liar circumstances gave occasion to this early compilation. The victorious crusaders settled as a colony in a foreign country, and adventurers from a! 1 the different nations of Europe composed this new society. It was neces- sary on that account to ascertain the laws and customs which were to regulate the transactions of business and the administration of justice among them. But in no country of Europe was there, at that time, any collection of customs, nor had any attempt been made to render law fixed. The first undertaking of that kind was by Glanville, lord chief justice of England, in his Tractatus de Legibus et Consuetudinibus Anglia?, composed about the year 1181. The Regiam Majestatem in Scotland, ascribed to David L, seems to be an imitation, and a servile one, of Glanville. Several Scottish antiquaries, under the influence of that pious credulity which dis- poses men to assent without hesitation to whatever they deem for the honour of their native country, contend zealously that the Regiam Majes- tatem is a production prior to the treatise of Glanville, and have brought themselves to believe that a nation in a superior state of improvement bor- rowed its laws and institutions from one considerably less advanced in its political progress. The internal evidence (were it my province to examine it) by which this theory might be refuted is, in my opinion, decisive. The external circumstances which have seduced Scottish authors into this mis- take ha ye been explained with so much precision and candour by Sir David Dalrymple, in his examination of some of the arguments for the high antiquity of the Regiam Majestatem (Edin., 1769, 4to), that it is to be hoped the controversy will not be again revived. Pierre de Fontaines, wh^ tells us that he was the first who had attempted such a work in France, composed his Conseil, which contains an account of the customs of the country of Vermandois in the reign of St. Louis, which began Jt. n. 1226. Beaumanoir, the author of the Coustumes de Beauvoisis, lived about the same time. The Establissemens of St. Louis, containing a large col- lection of the customs which prevailed within the royal domains, were published by the authority of that monarch. As soon as men became acquainted with the advantages of having written customs and laws to which they could have recourse on every occasion, the practice of col- NOTE xxvi.] PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 249 lecting them became common. Charles VII. of France, by an ordinance A.D. 1453, appointed the customary laws in every province of France to be collected and arranged. Velly et Villaret, Histoire, torn. xvi. p. 113. His successor, Louis XL, renewed the injunction. But this salutary undertaking hath never been fully executed, and the jurisprudence of the French nation remains more obscure and uncertain than it would have been if these prudent regulations of their monarchs had taken effect. A mode of judicial determination was established in the Middle Ages, which affords the clearest proof that judges, while they had no other rule to direct their decrees but unwritten and traditionary customs, were often at a loss how to find out the facts and principles according to which they were bound to decide. They were obliged, in dubious cases, to call a certain number of old men, and to lay the case before them, that they might inform them what was the practice or custom with regard to the point. This was called enqueste par tourbe. (Du Cange, voc. Turbo,.) The effects of the revival of the Roman jurisprudence have been explained by M. de Montesquieu (liv. xxviii. c. 42), and by Mr. Hume (Hist, of England, vol. ii p. 441). I have adopted many of their ideas. Who can pretend to review any sub- ject which such writers have considered, without receiving from them light and information ? At the same time,- 1 am convinced that the know- ledge of the Roman law was not so entirely lost in Europe during the Middle Ages as is commonly believed. My subject does not require me to examine this point. Many striking facts with regard to it are col- lected by Donato Antonio d' Asti, Dell' Uso e Autoritk della Ragione civile nelle Provincie dell' Imperio Occidentale, Nap., 1751, 2 vols. 8vo. That the civil law is intimately connected with the municipal jurispru- dence in several countries of Europe is a fact so well known that it needs no illustration. Even in England, where the common law is supposed to form a system perfectly distinct from the Roman code, and although such as apply in that country to the study of the common law boast of this distinction with some degree of affectation, it is evident that many of the ideas and maxims of the civil law are incorporated into the English jurisprudence. This is well illustrated by the ingenious and learned author of Observations on the Statutes, chiefly the more Ancient, 3d edit., p. 76, etc. NOTE XXVI. Sect. I. p. 66. The whole history of the Middle Ages makes it evident that war was the sole profession of gentlemen, and almost the only object attended to in their education. Even after some change in manners began to take place, and the civil arts of life had acquired some reputation, the ancient ideas with respect to the accomplishments necessary for a person of noble birth continued long in force. In the Me'ruoires de Fleuranges, p. 9, etc., we have an account of the youthful exercises and occupations of Francis I., and they were altogether martial and athletic. That father of letters owed his relish for them, not to education, but to his own good sense and good taste. The manners of the superior order of ecclesiastics during the Middle Ages furnish the strongest proof that, in some instances, the dis- tinction of professions was not completely ascertained in Europe. The 250 PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE xxvm. functions and character of the clergy are obviously very different from those of laymen ; and among the inferior orders of churchmen this constituted a distinct character separate from that of other citizens. But the dignified ecclesiastics, who were frequently of noble birth, were above such a distinc- tion ; they retained the idea of what belonged to them as gentlemen, and, in spite of the decrees of popes or the canons of councils, they bore arms, led their vassals to the field, and fought at their head in battle. Among them the priesthood was scarcely a separate profession ; the military accom- plishments which they thought essential to them as gentlemen were culti- vated ; the theological science and pacific virtues suitable to their spiritual function were neglected and despised. As soon as the science of law became a laborious study, and the practice of it a separate profession, such persons as rose to eminence in it obtained honours which had formerly been appropriated to soldiers. Knighthood was the most illustrious mark of distinction during several ages, and con- ferred privileges to which rank or birth alone was not entitled. To this high dignity persons eminent for their knowledge of law were advanced, and were thereby placed on a level with those whom their military talents had rendered conspicuous. Miles justitice, miles literatus, became common titles. Matthew Paris mentions such knights as early as A.D. 1251. If a judge attained a certain rank in the courts of justice, that alone gave him a right to the honour of knighthood. (Pasquier, Recherches, liv. xi. c. 16, p. 130 ; Dissertations historiques sur la Che valeric, par Honors' de Sainte-Marie, p. 164, etc.) A profession that led to offices which enno- bled the persons who held them grew into credit, and the people of Europe became accustomed to see men rise to eminence by civil as well as military talents. NOTE XXVII. Sect. I. p. 69. The chief intention of these notes was to bring at once under the view of my readers such facts and circumstances as tend to illustrate or confirm what is contained in that part of the history to which they refer. When these lay scattered in many different authors, and were taken from books not generally known, or which many of my readers might find it disagree- able to consult, I thought it would be of advantage to collect them together. But when every thing necessary for the proof or illustration of my narra- tive or reasoning may be found in any one book which is generally known, or deserves to be so, I shall satisfy myself with referring to it. This is the case with respect to chivalry. Almost every fact which I have mentioned in the text, together with many other curious and instructive particulars concerning this singular institution, may be found in Memoires sur 1'ancienne Chevalerie conside're'e comme une Establissement politique et militaire, par M. de la Curne de Ste. Palaye. NOTE XXVIII. Sect. I. p. 74. The subject of my inquiries does not call me to write a history of the progress of science. The facts and observations which I have produced are f England, vol. ii. p. 455.) Thus the Lombards found themselves engaged in a traffic which was everywhere deemed criminal and odious. They were liable to punishment if detected. They were not satisfied, therefore, with that moderate premium which they might have claimed if their trade had been open and authorized by law. They exacted a sum proportional to the danger and infamy of a discovery. Accordingly, we find that it was usual for them to demand twenty per cent, for the use of money in the thirteenth century. (Murat., Antiq. Ital., vol. L p. 893.) About the beginning of that century the countess of Flanders was obliged to borrow money in order to pay her husband's ransom. She procured the sum requisite either from Italian merchants or from Jews. The lowest interest which she paid to them was above twenty per cent., and some of them exacted near thirty. (Martene and Durand., Thesaur. Anecdotorum, vol. i p. 886.) In the fourteenth century, A.D. 1311, Philip IV. fixed the interest which might be legally exacted in the fairs of Champagne at twenty per cent. (Ordon., torn. i. p. 484.) The interest of money in Aragon was somewhat lower. James I., A.D. 1242, fixed it by law at eighteen per cent. (Petr. de Marca, Marca, sive Limes Hispan., App. 1433.) As late as the year 1490, it appears that the interest of money in Placentia was at the rate of forty per cent. This is the more VOL. I. PEOOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE xxx extraordinary because at that time the commerce of the Italian states waa become considerable. (Memorie storiche de Piacenza, torn. viii. p. 104, Piac., 1760.) It appears from Lud. Guicciardini that Charles V. had fixed the rate of interest in his dominions in the Low Countries at twelve per cent., and at the time when he wrote, about the year 1560, it waa not uncommon to exact more than that sum. He complains of this as exorbitant, and points out its bad effects both on agriculture and commerce. (Descritt. de' Paesi Bassi, p. 172.) This high interest of money is alone a proof that the profits on commerce were exorbitant, and that it was not carried on to great extent. The Lombards were likewise established in England in the thirteenth century, and a considerable street in the city of London still bears their name. They enjoyed great privileges, and carried on an extensive commerce, particularly as bankers. (See Anderson's ChronoL Deduction, vol. i. pp. 137, 160, 204, 231, where the statutes or other authorities which confirm this are quoted.) But the chief mart for Italian commodities was at Bruges. Navigation was then so imperfect that to sail from any port in the Baltic, and to return again was a voyage too great to be performed in one summer. For that reason, a magazine or storehouse, half-way between the commercial cities in the North and those in Italy, became necessary. Bruges was pitched upon as the most convenient station. That choice introduced vast wealth into the Low Countries. Bruges was at once the staple for English wool, for the woollen and linen manufactures of the Netherlands, for the naval stores and other bulky commodities of the North, and for the Indian commodities as well as domestic productions imported by the Italian states. The extent of its commerce in Indian goods with Venice alone appears from one fact. In the year 1318 five Venetian galeasses laden with Indian commodities arrived at Bruges in order to dispose of their cargoes at the fair. These galeasses were vessels of very considerable burden. (L. Guic., Descritt. de' Paesi Bassi, p. 174.) Bruges was the greatest emporium in all Europe. Many proofs of this occur in the historians and records of the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries. But, instead of multiplying quotations, I shall refer my readers to Anderson, vol. L pp. 12, 137, 213, 246, etc. The nature of this work prevents me from entering into any more minute detail, but there are some detached facts which give a high idea of the wealth both of the Flemish and Italian commercial states. The duke of Brabant contracted his daughter to the Black Prince, son of Edward III. of England, A.D. 1339, and gave her a portion which we may reckon to be of equal value with three hundred thousand pounds of our present money. (Rymer's Foedera, vol. v. p. 113.) John Galeazzo Visconti, duke of Milan, concluded a treaty of marriage between his daughter and Lionel, duke of Clarence, Edward's third son, A.D. 1367, and granted her a portion equal to two hundred thousand pounds of our present money. (Rymer's Fcedera, voL vi p. 547.) These exorbitant sums, so far exceeding what was then granted by the most powerful monarchs, acd which appear extraordinary even in the present age, when the wealth of Europe is so much increased, must have arisen from the riches which flowed into those countries from their extensive and lucrative commerce. The first source of wealth to the towns situated on the Baltic Sea seems to have been the herring-fishery, the shoals of herring!? frequenting at HOTE xxx.] PEOOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 259 that time the coasts of Sweden and Denmark in the same manner as they now resort to the British coasts. The effects of this fishery are thus described by an author of the thirteenth century. The Danes, says he, who were formerly clad in the poor garb of sailors, are now clothed in scarlet, purple, and fine linen. For they abound with wealth flowing from their annual fishery on the coast of Schonen ; so that all nations resort to them, bringing their gold, silver, and precious commodities, that they may purchase herrings, which the Divine bounty bestows upon them. Arnoldus Lubecensis, ap. Conring., de Urbib. German., 87. The Hanseatic League is the most powerful commercial confederacy known in history. Its origin towards the close of the twelfth century, and the objects of its union, are described by Knipschildt, Tractatus Historico-Politico-Juridicus de Juribus Civitat. Imper., lib. i. cap. 4. Anderson has mentioned the chief facts with respect to their commercial progress, the extent of the privileges which they obtained in different countries, their successful wars with several monarchs, as well as the spirit and zeal with which they contended for those liberties and rights without which it is impossible to carry on commerce to advantage. The vigorous efforts of a society of merchants attentive only to commercial objects could not fail of diffusing new and more liberal ideas concerning justice and order in every country of Europe where they settled. In England the progress of commerce was extremely slow ; and the causes of this are obvious. During the Saxon Heptarchy, England, split into many petty kingdoms, which were perpetually at variance with each other, exposed to the fierce incursions of the Danes and other Northern pirates, and sunk in barbarity and ignorance, was in no condition to cultivate commerce, or to pursue any system of useful and salutary policy. When a better prospect began to open, by the union of the kingdom under one monarch, the Norman Conquest took place. This occasioned such a violent shock, as well as such a sudden and total revolution of property, that the nation did not recover from it during several reigns. By the time that the constitution began to acquire some stability, and the English had so incorporated with their conquerors as to become one people, the nation engaged with no less ardour than imprudence in support of the pretensions of their sovereigns to the crown of France, and long wasted its vigour and genius in its wild efforts to conquer that kingdom. When, by ill success and repeated disappoint- ments, a period was at last put to this fatal frenzy, and the nation, beginning to enjoy some repose, had leisure to breathe and to gather new strength, the destructive wars between the houses of York and Lancaster broke out, and involved the kingdom in the worst of all calamities. Thus, besides the common obstructions of commerce occasioned by the nature of the feudal government, and the state of manners during the Middle Ages, its progress in England was retarded by peculiar causes. Such a succession of events adverse to the commercial spirit was sufficient to have checked its growth although every other circumstance had favoured it. The English were accordingly one of the last nations in Europe who availed themselves of those commercial advantages which were natural or peculiar to their country. Before the reign of Edward III., all the wool of England, except a small quantity wrought into coarse cloths for s 2 260 PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE xxxi. home consumption, was sold to the Flemings or Lombards, and manu- factured by them. Though Edward, A.D. 1326, began to allure some of the Flemish weavers to settle in England, it was long before the English were capable of fabricating cloth for foreign markets, and the export of unwrought wool still continued to be the chief article of their commerce. (Anderson, passim.) All foreign commodities were brought into England by the Lombards or Hanseatic merchants. The English ports were frequented by ships both from the North and South of Europe, and they tamely allowed foreigners to reap all the profits arising from ihe supply of their wants. The first commercial treaty of England on record is that with Haquin, king of Norway, A.D. 1217. (Anders., voL i. p. 108.) But the English did not venture to trade in their own ships to the Baltic until the beginning of the fourteenth century. (Ibid., p. 151.) It was after the middle of the fifteenth before they sent any ship into the Mediterranean. (Ibid., p. 177.) Nor was it long before this period that their vessels began to visit the ports of Spain or Portugal. But though I have pointed out the slow progress of the English commerce as a fact little attended to, and yet meriting consideration, the concourse of foreigners to the ports of England, together with the communication among all the different countries in Europe, which went on increasing from the beginning of the twelfth century, is sufficient to justify all the observations and reasonings in the text concerning the influence of commerce on the state of manners and of society. NOTE XXXI. Sect. III. p. 144. I have not been able to discover the precise manner in which the justiza was appointed. Among the claims of the junta or union formed against James I., A.D. 1264, this was one : that the king should not nominate any person to be justiza without the consent or approbation of the ricos hombres, or nobles. (Zurita, Anales de Aragon, vol. i. p. 180.) But the king, in his answer to their remonstrance, asserts " that it was established by immemorial practice, and was conformable to the laws of the kingdom, that the king, in virtue of his royal prerogative, should name the justiza." (Zurita, ibid., 181 ; Blanca, 656.) From another passage in Zurita, it appears that while the Aragonese enjoyed the privilege of the union, i.e., the power of confederating against their sovereign as often as they conceived that he had violated any of their rights and immunities, the justiza was not only nominated by the king, but held his office during the king's pleasure. Nor was this practice attended with any bad effects, as the privilege of the union was a sufficient and effectual check to any abuse of the royal prerogative. But when the privilege of the union was abolished as dangerous to the order and peace of society, it was agreed that the justiza should continue in office during life. Several kings, however, attempted to remove justizas who were obnoxious to them, and they sometimes succeeded in the attempt. In order to guard against this encroachment, which would have destroyed the intention of the institution, and have rendered the justiza the dependant and tool of the crown, instead of the guardian of the people, a law waa enacted in the cortes, A.D. 1442, ordaining that the justiza should continue NOTE xxxi.] PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 2G1 in office during life, and should not be removed from it unless by the authority of the cortes. (Fueros y Observancias del Reyno de Aragon, lib. i. p. 22.) By former laws, the person of the justiza had been declared sacred, and he was responsible only to the cortes. (Ibid., p. 15, b.) Zurita and Blanca, who both published their histories while the justiza of Aragon retained the full exercise of his privileges and jurisdiction, have neglected to explain several circumstances with regard to the office of that respectable magistrate, because they addressed their works to their countrymen, who were well acquainted with every particular concerning the functions of a judge to whom they looked up as to the guardian of their liberties. It is vain to consult the later historians of Spain about any point with respect to which the excellent historians whom I have named are silent. The ancient constitution of their country was overturned, and despotism established on the ruin of its liberties, when the writers of this and the preceding century composed their histories, and on that account they had little curiosity to know the nature of those institutions to which their ancestors owed the enjoyment of freedom, or they were afraid to describe them with much accuracy. The spirit with which Mariana, his continuator Miniana, and Ferreras, write their histories, is very different from that of the two historians of Aragon from whom I have taken my account of the constitution of that kingdom. Two circumstances concerning the justiza, besides those which I have mentioned in the text, are worthy of observation. 1. None of the ricos hombres, or noblemen of the first order, could be appointed justiza. He was taken out of the second class of cavalleros, who seem to have been nearly of the same condition or rank with gentlemen or commoners in Great Britain. (Fueros y Observancias del Reyno, etc. lib. i. p. 21, b.) The reason was, by the laws of Aragon the ricos hombres were not subject to capital punishment ; but, as it was necessary for the security of liberty that the justiza should be accountable for the manner in which he executed the high trust reposed in him, it was a powerful restraint upon him to know that he was liable to be punished capitally. (Blanca, pp. 657, 756 ; Zurita, torn. ii. p. 229 ; Fueros y Observancias, lib. ix. pp. 182, b. 183.) It appears, too, from many passages in Zurita that the justiza was appointed to check the domineering and oppressive spirit of the nobles, as well as to set bounds to the power of the monarch, and therefore he was chosen from an order of citizens equally interested in opposing both. 2. A magistrate possessed of such vast powers as the justiza might have exercised them in a manner pernicious to the state if he himself had been subject to no control A constitutional remedy was on that account provided against this danger. Seventeen persons were chosen by lot in each meeting of the cortes. These formed a tribunal called the court of inquisition into the office of justiza. This court met at three stated terms in each year. Every person had liberty of complaining to it of any iniquity or neglect of duty in the justiza, or in the inferior judges who acted in his name. The justiza and his deputies were called to answer for their conduct. The members of the court passed sentence by ballot They might punish by degradation, confiscation of goods, or even with death. The law which erected this court and regulated the form of its procedure was enacted A.D. 1461. (Zurita, Anales, iv. 102 ; Blanca, 262 PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. I NOTE Comment Rer. Aragon., 770.) Previous to this period, inquiry was made into the conduct of the justiza, though not with the same formality. He was, from the first institution of the office, subject to the review of the cortes. The constant dread of such an impartial and severe inquiry into his behaviour was a powerful motive to the vigilant and faithful discharge of his duty. A remarkable instance of the authority of the justiza when opposed to that of the king occurs in the year 1386 By the constitution of Aragon, the eldest son or heir-apparent of the crown possessed considerable power and jurisdiction in the kingdom. (Fueros y Observancias del Reyno de Aragon, lib. i. p. 16.) Peter IV., instigated by a second wife, attempted to deprive his son of this, and enjoined his subjects to yield him no obedience. The prince immediately applied to the justiza, " the safeguard and defence," says Zurita, " against all violence and oppression." The justiza granted him the firma de derecho, the effect of which was that upon his giving surety to appear in judgment he could not be deprived of any immunity or privilege which he possessed, but in consequence of a legal trial before the justiza and of a sentence pronounced by him. This was published throughout the kingdom, and, notwithstanding the proclamation in contradiction to this which had been issued by the king, the prince continued in the exercise of all his rights, and his authority was universally recognised. Zurita, Anales de Aragon, torn. iL p. 385. NOTE XXXII. Sect III. p. 145. I have been induced, by the concurring testimony of many respectable authors, to mention this as the constitutional form of the oath of allegiance which the Aragonese took to their sovereigns. I must acknowledge, however, that I have not found this singular oath in any Spanish author whom I have had an opportunity of consulting. It is mentioned neither by Zurita, nor Blanca, nor Argensola, nor Sayas, who were all historio- graphers appointed by the cortes of Aragon to record the transactions of the kingdom. All these writers possess a merit which is very rare among historians. They are extremely accurate in tracing the progress of the laws and constitution of their country. Their silence with respect to this creates some suspicion concerning the genuineness of the oath. But as it is mentioned by so many authors, who produce the ancient Spanish words in which it is expressed, it is probable that they have taken it from some writer of credit whose works have not fallen into my hands. The spirit of the oath is perfectly agreeable to the genius of the Aragonese corstitu- tion. Since the publication of the first edition, the learned M. Totze, Professor of History at Batzow, in the duchy of Mecklenburg, has been so good as to point out to me a Spanish author of great authority who has published the words of this oath. It is Antonio Perez, a native of Aragon, secretary to Philip II. The words of the oath are, " Nos que valemos tanto como vos, os hazemos nuestro rey y senor, con tal que nos guardeys nuestros fueros y libertades, y si No, No." Las Obras y Relaciones de Ant Perez, 8vo, por Juan de la Planche, 1631, p. 143. The privilege of union which I have mentioned in the preceding note ami alluded to in the text is indeed one of the most singular which could WOTE xxxii.] PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 263 take place in a regular government, and the oath that I have quoted ex- presses nothing more than this constitutional privilege entitled the Aragonese to perform. If the king or his ministers violated any of the laws or immunities of the Aragonese, and did not grant immediate redress in consequence of their representations and remonstrances, the nobles of the first rank, or ricos hombres de natura, y de mesnada, the equestrian order, or the nobility of the second class, called hidalgos y infanciones, together with the magistrates of cities, might, either in the cortes or in a voluntary assembly, join in union, and, binding themselves by mutual oaths and the exchange of hostages to be faithful to each other, they might require the king, in the name and by the authority of this body corporate, to grant them redress. If the king refused to comply with their request, or took arms in order to oppose them, they might, in virtue of the privilege of union, instantly withdraw their allegiance from the king, refuse to ac- knowledge him as their sovereign, and proceed to elect another monarch ; nor did they incur any guilt or become liable to any prosecution on that account. (Blanca, Com. Rer. Arag., 661, 669.) This union did not re- semble the confederacies in other feudal kingdoms. It was a constitutional association, in which legal privileges were vested, which issued its man- dates under a common seal, and proceeded in all its operations by regular and ascertained forms. This dangerous right was not only claimed, but exercised. In the year 1287 the Aragonese formed a union in opposition to Alfonso III., and obliged that king not only to comply with their de- mands, but to ratify a privilege so fatal to the power of the crown. (Zurita, Anales, torn. i. p. 322.) In the year 1347 a union was formed against Peter IV. with equal success, and a new ratification of the privilege was extorted. (Zurita, torn. ii. p. 202.) But soon after, the king having defeated the leaders of the union in battle, the privilege of union was finally abrogated in the cortes, and all the laws or records which contained any confirmation of it were cancelled or destroyed. The king, in presence of the cortes, called for the act whereby he had ratified the union, and, having wounded his hand with his poniard, he held it above the record. " That privilege," says he, " which has been so fatal to the kingdom, and so injurious to royalty, should be effaced with the blood of a king." (Zurita, torn. ii. p. 229.) The law abolishing the union is published, Fueros y Observancias, lib. ix. p. 1 78. "From that period the justiza be- came the constitutional guardian of public liberty, and his power and juris- diction occasioned none of those violent convulsions which the tumultuary privilege of the union was apt to produce. The constitution of Aragon, however, still remained extremely free. One source of this liberty arose from the early admission of the representatives of cities into the cortes. It seems probable from Zurita that burgesses were constituent members of the cortes from its first institution. He mentions a meeting of cortes, A.D. 1133, in which the procuradores de las ciudades y villas were present. (Tom. i. p. 51.) This is the constitutional language in which their presence is declared in the cortes, after the journals of that court were regularly kept. It is probable that an historian so accurate as Zurita would not have used these words if he had not taken them from some authentic record. It was more than a century after this period before the representatives of cities formed a constituent part in the supreme assemblies of the other 264 PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE xxxii. European nations. The free spirit of the Aragonese government is con- spicuous in many particulars. The cortes not only opposed the attempts of their kings to increase their revenue or to extend their prerogative, but they claimed rights and exercised powers which will appear extraordinary even in a country accustomed to the enjoyment of liberty. In the year 1286 the cortes claimed the privilege of naming the members of the king's council and the officers of his household, and they seem to have obtained it for some time. (Zurita, torn. i. pp. 303, 307.) It was the privilege of the cortes to name the officers who commanded the troops raised by their authority. This seems to be evident from a passage in Zurita. When the cortes, in the year 1503, raised a body of troops to be em- ployed in Italy, it passed an act empowering the king to name the officers who should command them (Zurita, torn. v. p. 274) ; which plainly implies that without this warrant it did not belong to him in virtue of his prerogative. In the Fueros y Observancias del Reyno de Aragon, two general declarations of the rights and privileges of the Aragonese are published, the one in the reign of Pedro I., A.D. 1283, and the other in that of James II., A.D. 1325. They are of such a length that I cannot insert them ; but it is evident from these that not only the privileges of the nobility, but the rights of the people, personal as well as political, were at that period more extensive and better under- stood than in any kingdom in Europe. (Lib. i. pp. 7, 9.) The oath by which the king bound himself to observe those rights and liberties of the people was very solemn. (Ibid., p. 14, b, and p. 15.) The cortes of Aragon discovered riot only the jealousy and vigilance which are peculiar to free states, in guarding the essential parts of the constitution, but they were scrupulously attentive to observe the most minute forms and cere- monies to which they were accustomed. According to the established laws and customs of Aragon, no foreigner had liberty to enter the hall in which the cortes assembled. Ferdinand, in the year 1481, appointed his queen, Isabella, regent of the kingdom while he was absent during the course of the campaign. The law required that a regent should take the oath of fidelity in presence of the cortes ; but, as Isabella was a foreigner, before she could be admitted the cortes thought it necessary to pass an act autho- rizing the serjeant-porter to open the door of the hall and to allow her to enter : "so attentive were they," says Zurita, " to observe their laws and forms, even such as may seem the most minute." Tom. iv. p. 313. The Aragonese were no less solicitous to secure the personal rights of individuals than to maintain the freedom of the constitution ; and the spirit of their statutes with respect to both was equally liberal. Two facts relative to this matter merit observation. By an express statute in the year 1335 it was declared to be unlawful to put any native Aragonese to the torture. If he could not be convicted by the testimony of witnesses, he was instantly absolved. (Zurita, torn. ii. p. 66.) Zurita records the regulation with the satisfaction natural to an historian when he contem- plates the humanity of his countrymen. He compares the laws of Aragon to those of Rome, as both exempted citizens and freemen from such igno- minious and cruel treatment and had recourse to it only in. the trial of slaves. Zurita had reason to bestow such an encomium on the laws of his country. Torture was at that time permitted by the laws of every kcxns xxxm.] PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 265 other nation in Europe. Even in England, from which the mild spirit of legislation has long banished it, torture was not at that time unknown. Observations on the Statutes, chiefly the more Ancient, etc., p. 66. The other fact shows that the same spirit which influenced the legisla- ture prevailed among the people. In the year 1485 the religious steal of Ferdinand and Isabella prompted them to introduce the Inquisition into Aragon. Though the Aragonese were no less superstitiously attached than the other Spaniards to the Roman Catholic faith, and no less desirous to root out the seeds of error and of heresy which the Jews and Moors had scattered, yet they took arms against the inquisitors, murdered the chief inquisitor, and long opposed the establishment of that tribunal. The reason which they gave for their conduct was, that the mode of trial in the Inquisition was inconsistent with liberty. The criminal was not confronted with the witnesses, he was not acquainted with what they deposed against him, he was subjected to torture, and the goods of persons condemned were confiscated. Zurita, Anales, torn. iv. p. 341. The form of government in the kingdom of Valencia and principality of Catalonia, which were annexed to the crown of Aragon, was likewise extremely favourable to liberty. The Valencians enjoyed the privilege of union in the same manner with the Aragonese. But they had no magis- trate resembling the justiza. The Catalonians were no less jealous of their liberties than the two other nations, and no less bold in asserting them. But it is not necessary for illustrating the following history to enter into any further detail concerning the peculiarities in the constitution of these kingdoms. NOTE XXXIII. Sect. III. p. 146. I have searched in vain among the historians of Castile for such infor- mation as might enable me to trace the progress of laws and government in Castile, or to explain the nature of the constitution with the same degree of accuracy wherewith I have described the political state of Aragon. It is manifest, not only from the historians of Castile, but from its ancient laws, particularly the Fuero Juzgo, that its monarchs were originally elective. (Ley es, 2, 5, 8.) They were chosen by the bishops, the nobility, and the people. (Ibid.) It appears from the same venerable code of laws that the prerogative of the Castilian monarchs was extremely limited. Villaldiego, in his commentary on the Fuero Juzgo, produces many facts and authorities in confirmation of both these particulars. Dr. Geddes, who was well acquainted with Spanish literature, complains that he could find no author who gave a distinct account of the cortes or supreme assembly of the nation, or who described the manner in which it was held, or men- tioned the precise number of members who had a right to sit in it He produces, however, from Gil Gonzales d'Avila, who published a history of Henry II., the writ of summons to the town of Abula, requiring it to choose representatives to appear in the cortes which he called to meet A.D. 1390. From this we learn that prelates, dukes, marquises, the masters of the three military orders, condes, and ricos hombres, were re- quired to attend. These composed the bodies of ecclesiastics and nobles, which formed two members of the legislature. The :ities which sent 266 PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE xxxv. members to that meeting of the cortes were forty-eight. The number of representatives (for the cities had right to choose more or fewer according to their respective dignity) amounted to a hundred and twenty-five. (Geddes, Miscellaneous Tracts, vol. L p. 331.) Zurita, having occasion to mention the cortes which Ferdinand held at Toro, A.D. 1505, in order to secure for himself the government of Castile after the death of Isabella, records, with his usual accuracy, the names of the members present, and of the cities which they represented. From that list it appears that only eighteen cities had deputies in this assembly. (Anales de Aragon, torn. vi. p. 3.) What was the occasion of this great difference in the number of cities represented in these two meetings of the cortes, I am unable to explain. NOTE XXXIV. Sect. III. p. 148. A great part of the territory in Spain was engrossed by the nobility. L. Marinseus Siculus, who composed his treatise De Rebus Hispaniae during the reign of Charles V., gives a catalogue of the Spanish nobility, together with the yearly rent of their estates. According to his account, which he affirms was as accurate as the nature of the subject would admit, the sum total of the annual revenue of their lands amounted to one million four hundred and eighty-two thousand ducats. If we make allowance for the great difference in the value of money in the fifteenth century from that which it now bears, and consider that the catalogue of Marinaeus includes only the titulados, or nobility whose families were distinguished by some honorary title, their wealth must appear very great. (L. Marinaeus, ap. Schott., Script. Hispan., vol. i. p. 323.) The commons of Castile, in their contests with the crown, which I shall hereafter relate, complain of the extensive property of the nobility as extremely pernicious to the kingdom. In one of their manifestoes they assert that from Valladolid to St. Jago in Galicia, which was a hundred leagues, the crown did not possess more than three villages. All the rest belonged to the nobility, and could be sub- jected to no public burden. (Sandoval, Vida del Emperador Carlos V., vol. i. p. 422.) It appears from the testimony of authors quoted by Bova- dilla that these extensive possessions were bestowed upon the ricos hombres, hidalgos, and cavalleros by the kings of Castile in reward for the assistance which they had received from them in expelling the Moors. They like- wise obtained by the same means a considerable influence in the cities, many of which anciently depended upon the nobility. Politica para Corregidores, Amb., 1750, foL, vol. i. pp. 440, 442. Nora XXXV. Sect. III. p. 150. I have been able to discover nothing certain, as I observed, Note XVIII., with respect to the origin of communities or free cities in Spain. It is probable that as soon as the considerable towns were recovered from the Moors the inhabitants who fixed their residence in them, being persons of distinction and credit, had all the privilege of municipal government and jurisdiction conferred upon them. Many striking proofs occur of the Bplendoxir, wealth, and power of the Spanish cities. Hieronymufi Paulua KOTE xxxvi.] PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 267 wrote a description of Barcelona in the year 1491, and compares the dimensions of the town to that of Naples, and the elegance of its buildings, the variety of its manufactures, and the extent of its commerce, to Flo- rence. (Hieron. Paulus, ap. Schott., Script. Hisp., vol. iL p. 844.) Marinseus describes Toledo as a large and populous city. A great number of its inhabitants were persons of quality and of illustrious rank. Its commerce was great. It carried on with great activity and success the manufactures of silk and wool ; and the number of inhabitants employed in these two branches of trade amounted nearly to ten thousand. (Marin., ubi supra, p. 308.) " I know no city," says he, " that I would prefer to Valladolid for elegance and splendour." (Ibid., p. 312.) We may form some estimate of its populousness from the following circumstances. The citizens having taken arms in the year 1516 in order to oppose a measure concerted by Cardinal Ximenes, they mustered in the city, and in the territory which belonged to it, thirty-thousand fighting-men. (Sandoval, Vida del Emper. Carlos V., torn, i p. 81.) The manufactures carried on in the towns of Spain were not intended merely for home consumption ; they were exported to foreign countries, and their commerce was a consider- able source of wealth to the inhabitants. The maritime laws of Barcelona are the foundation of mercantile jurisprudence in modern times, as the Leges Rhodiae were among the ancients. All the commercial states in Italy adopted these laws and regulated their trade according to them. (Sandi, Storia civile Veneziana, vol. ii. p. 865.) It appears from several ordinances of the kings of France that the merchants of Aragon and Castile were received on the same footing and admitted to the same privileges with those of Italy. (Ordonnances des Roys, etc., torn, ii. p. 135, torn. iii. pp. 166, 504, 635.) Cities in such a flourishing state became a respect- able part of the society, and were entitled to a considerable share in the legislature. The magistrates of Barcelona aspired to the highest honour a Spanish subject can enjoy, that of being covered in the presence of their sovereign, and of being treated as grandees of the kingdom. Origen de la Dignidad de Grande de Castilla, por Don Alonso Carillo, Madrid, 1657, p. ia NOTE XXXVL Sect IIL p. 162. The military order of St. Jago, the most honourable and opulent of the three Spanish orders, was instituted about the year 1170. The bull of confirmation by Alexander III. is dated A.D. 1176. At that time a con- siderable part of Spain still remained under subjection to the Moors, and the whole country was much exposed to depredations not only of the enemy, but of banditti. It is no wonder, then, that an institution the object of which was to oppose the enemies of the Christian faith, and to restrain and punish those who disturbed the public peace, should be ex- tremely popular and meet with general encouragement The wealth and power of the order became so great that, according to one historian, the Grand Master of St. Jago was the person in Spain of greatest power and dignity next to the king. (JSL Anton. Nebrissensis, ap. Schott, Script. Hisp., i. 812.) Another historian observes that the order possessed every thing in Castile that a king would most desire to obtain. (Zurita, Anales, 268 PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE xxxvi. v. 22.) The knights took the vows of obedience, of poverty, and of con- jugal chastity. By the former they were bound implicitly to obey the commands of their grand master. The order could bring into the field a thousand men-at-arms. (Ml. Ant. Nebriss., p. 813.) If, as we have reason to believe, these men-at-arms were accompanied as was usual at th.it age, this was a formidable body of cavalry. There belonged to this order eighty-four commanderies, and two hundred priories and other benefices. (Dissertations sur la Che Valerie, par Hon. de Ste. Marie, p. 262.) It is obvious how formidable to his sovereign the command of these troops, the administration of such revenues, and the disposal of so many offices must have rendered a subject. The other two orders, though inferior to that of St. Jago in power and wealth, were nevertheless very considerable frater- nities. When the conquest of Granada deprived the knights of St. Jago of those enemies against whom their zeal was originally directed, supersti- tion found out a new object in defence of which they engaged to employ their courage. To their usual oath they added the following clause : " We do swear to believe, to maintain, and to contend in public and private, that the Virgin Mary, the Mother of God, our Lady, was conceived without the stain of original sin." This addition was made about the middle of the seventeenth century. (Honord de Ste. Marie, Dissertations, etc., p. 263.) Nor is such a singular engagement peculiar to the order of St. Jago. The members of the second military order in Spain, that of Calatrava, equally zealous to employ their prowess in defence of the honours of the Blessed Virgin, have likewise professed themselves her true knights. Their vow, conceived in terms more theologically accurate than that of St. Jago, may afford some amusement to an English reader. " I vow to God, to the grand master, and to you who here represent his person, that now, and forever, I will maintain and contend that the Virgin Mary, Mother of God, our Lady, was conceived without original sin, and never incurred the pollution of it ; but that in the moment of her happy concep- tion, and of the union of her soul with her body, the Divine grace pre- vented and preserved her from original guilt, by the merits of the passion and death of Christ, our Redeemer, her future Son, foreseen in the Divine counsel, by which she was truly redeemed, and by a more noble kind of redemption than any of the children of Adam. In the belief of this truth, and in maintaining the honour of the most Holy Virgin, through the strength of Almighty God, I will live and will die." (Definiciones de la Orden de Calatrava, conforme al Capitulo General en 1652, fol., Madr., 1748, p. 153.) Though the Church of Rome hath prudently avoided to give its sanction to the doctrine of the immaculate conception, and the two great monastic orders of St. Dominic and St. Francis have espoused oppo- site opinions concerning it, the Spaniards are such ardent champions for the honour of the Virgin that when the present king of Spain instituted a new military order in the year 1771, in commemoration of the birth of his grandson, he put it under the immediate protection of the most Holy Mary in the mystery of her immaculate conception. (Constituciones de la real y distinguida Orden Espafiola de Carlos III., p. 7.) To undertake the defence of the Virgin Mary's honour had such a resemblance to that species of refined gallantry which was the original object of chivalry, that the zeal with which the military orders bound themselves, by a solemn vow, to VOTE xxxvn.] PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 269 defend it, was worthy of a true knight in those ages when the spirit of the institution subsisted in full vigour. But in the present age it must excite some surprise to see the institution of an illustrious order connected with a doctrine so extravagant and destitute of any foundation in Scripture. NOTE XXXVIL Sect III. p. 154. I have frequently had occasion to take notice of the defects in police during the Middle Ages, occasioned by the feebleness of government and the want of proper subordination among the different ranks of men. I have observed in a former note that this greatly interrupted the inter- course between nations, and even between different places in the same kingdom. The descriptions which the Spanish historians give of the frequency of rapine, murder, and every act of violence, in all the provinces of Spain, are amazing, and present to us the idea of a society but little removed from the disorder and turbulence of that which has been called a state of nature. (Zurita, Anales de Arag., i. 175 ; ML Ant. Nebrissensis, Rer. a Ferdin., Gestar. Hist., ap. Schottum, ii. 849.) Though the excess of these disorders rendered the institution of the santa hermandad necessary, great care was taken at first to avoid giving any offence or alarm to the nobility. The jurisdiction of the judges of the hermandad was expressly confined to crimes which violated the public peace. All other offences were left to the cognizance of the ordinary judges. If a person was guilty of the most notorious perjury, in any trial before a judge of the hermandad, he could not punish him, but was obliged to remit the case to the ordinary judge of the place. (Commentaria in Regias Hispan. Constitut., per Alph. de Azevedo, pars. v. p. 223, etc., fol., Duaci, 1612.) Notwithstanding these restrictions, the barons were early sensible how much the establishment of the hermandad would encroach on their jurisdiction. In Castile some opposition was made to the institution ; but Ferdinand had the address to obtain the consent of the constable to the introduction of the hermandad into that part of the kingdom where his estate lay ; and by that means, as well as the popularity of the institution, he surmounted every obstacle that stood in its way. (JE,l. Ant. Nebrissen, 851.) In Aragon the nobles combined against it with great spirit ; and Ferdinand, though he supported it with vigour, was obliged to make some concessions in order to reconcile them. (Zurita, Anales de Arag., iv. :356.) The power and revenue of the hermandad in Castile seem to have been very great. Ferdinand, when preparing for the war against the Moors of Granada, required of the hermandad to furnish him sixteen thousand beasts of burden, together with eight thousand men to conduct them, and he obtained what he demanded. (ML Ant Nebriss., 881.) The hermandad has been found to be of so much use in preserving peace and restraining or detecting crimes that it is still continued in Spain ; but. as it is no longer necessary either for moderating the power of the nobility or extending that of the crown, the vigour and authority of the institution diminish gradually. 270 PEOOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE xxxvra. NOTE XXXVIIL Sect IIL p. 156. Nothing is more common among antiquaries, and there is not a more copious source of error, than to decide concerning the institutions and manners of past ages by the forms and ideas which prevail in their own times. The French lawyers in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, having found their sovereigns in possession of absolute power, seem to think it a duty incumbent on them to maintain that such unbounded authority belonged to the crown in every period of their monarchy. " The government of France," says M. de Re'al, very gravely, " is purely monarchical at this day, as it was from the beginning. Our kings were absolute originally, as they are at present" (Science du Gouvernement, torn. ii. p. 31.) It is impossible, however, to conceive two states of civil society more unlike to each other than that of the French nation under Clovis and that under Louis XV. It is evident from the codes of laws of the various tribes which settled in Gaul and the countries adjacent to it, as well as from the history of Gregory of Tours, and other early annalists, that among all these people the form of government was extremely rude and simple, and that they had scarcely began to acquire the first rudiments of that order and police which are necessary in extensive societies. The king or leader had the command of soldiers or companions, who followed his standard from choice, not by constraint. I have produced the clearest evidence of this, Note VI. An event related by Gregory of Tours, lib. iv. c. 14, affords the most striking proof of the dependence of the early French kings on the sentiments and inclination of their people. Clotaire I. having marched at the head of his army, in the year 553, against the Saxons, that people, intimidated at his approach, sued for peace, and offered to pay a large sum to the offended monarch. Clotaire was willing to close with what they proposed. But his army insisted to be led forth to battle. The king employed all his eloquence to persuade them to accept of what the Saxons were ready to pay. The Saxons, in order to soothe them, increased their original offer. The king renewed his solicitations ; but the army, enraged, rushed upon the king, tore his tent in pieces, dragged him out of it, and would have slain him on the spot, if he had not consented to lead them instantly against the enemy. If the early monarchs of France possessed such limited authority, even while at the head of their army, their prerogative during peace will be found to be still more confined. They ascended the throne not by any hereditary right, but in consequence of the election of their subjects. In order to avoid an unnecessary number of quotations, I refer my readers to Hottomanni Franco-Gallia, cap. vi. p. 47, edit. 1573, where they will find the fullest proof of this from Gregory of Tours, Amoinus, and the most authentic historians of the Merovingian kings. The effect of this electiou was not to invest them with absolute power. Whatever related to the general welfare of the nation was submitted to public deliberation, and determined by the suffrage of the people, in the annual assemblies called " les champs de Mars " and " les champs de Mai." These assemblies were called champs, because, according to the custom of all the barbarous nations, they were held in the open air in some plain capable of containing the NOTE xxxviri.] PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 271 vast number of persons who had a right to be present (Jo. Jac. Sorberua de Comitiis Veterum German orum, voL i. 19, etc.) They were denomi- nated Champs de Mars and de Mai, from the months in which they wore heW. Every freeman seems to have had a right to be present in these assemblies. (Sorberus, ibid., 133, etc.) The ancient annals of the Franks Describe the persons who were present in the assembly held A.D 788, in these words ; " In placito Ingelheimensi conveniunt pontihces, mujores, minores, sacerdotes, reguli, duces, comites, praefecti, cives, oppidani." (Apud Sorber., 304.) There every thing that concerned the happiness of their country, says an ancient historian, every thing that could be of benefit to the Franks, was considered and enjoined. (Frede- garius, ap. Du Cange, Glossar., voc. Campus Martii.) Chlotharius II. describes the business and acknowledges the authority of these assemblies. " They are called," says he, " that whatever relates to the common safety may be considered and resolved by common deliberation ; and whatever they determined, to that I will conform." (Amoinus de Gest Franc., lib. iv. c. i., ap. Bouquet, Recueil, iii. 116.) The statutory clauses or words of legislative authority in the decrees issued in these assemblies run not in the name of the king alone. " We have treated," says Childebert, in a decree, A.D. 532, in the assembly of March, " together with our nobles, concerning some affairs, and we now publish the conclusion, that it may come to the knowledge of all." (Childeb. Deeret., ap. Bouquet, Recueil des Histor., torn. iv. p. 3.) "We have agreed together with our vassals." (Ibid., 2.) " It is agreed in the assembly in which we are all united." (Ibid., 4.) The Salic laws, the most venerable monument of French jurisprudence, were enacted in the same manner. " Dictaverunt Salicam legem proceres ipsius gentis, qui tune temporis apud earn erant rectores. Sunt autem electi de pluribus viri quatuor qui per tres Mallos con- venientes, omnes causarum origir/i-? ?olicite discurrendo, tractantes de eingulis, judicium decreverunt hoc modo." (Praef. Leg. Salic., ap. Bou- quet, ibid., p. 122.) " Hoc decretum est apud regem et principes ejus, et apud cunctum populum christianum, qui intra regnum Merwingorum consistunt." (Ibid., p. 124.) Nay, even in their charters the kings of the first race are careful to specify that they were granted with the consent of their vassals. " Ego Childebertus, rex, una cum consensu et voluntate Francorum," etc., A.D. 558. (Bouquet, ibid., 622.) " Chlotharius III. una cum patribus nostris, episcopis, optimatibus, caeterisque palatii nostri ministris," A.D. 664. (Ibid., 648.) " De consensu fidelium nostrorum." (Mably, Observ., torn. L p. 239.) The historians likewise describe the functions of the king in the national assemblies in such terms as imply that his authority there was extremely small, and that every thing de- pended on the court itself. " Ipse rex," says the author of Annales Fran- corum, speaking of the Field of March, " sedebat in sella regia, circum- atante exercitu, praecipiebatque is, die illo, quicquid a Francis decretum erat." Bouquet, Recueil, torn. ii. p. 647. That the general assemblies exercised supreme jurisdiction over all per- sons and with respect to all causes is so evident as to stand in need of no proof. The trial of Brunehaut, A.D. 613, how unjust soever the sentence against her may be, as related by Fredegarius (Chron., cap. 42, Bouquet, ibid., 430), is in itself sufficient proof of this. The notorious 272 -PROOFS AND ILLUSTEATIONS. [NOTE xxxvin. violence and iniquity of the sentence serve to demonstrate the extent of jurisdiction which this assembly possessed, as a prince so sanguinary as CJothaire II. thought the sanction of its authority would be sufficient to justify his rigorous treatment of the mother and grandmother of so many kings. With respect to conferring donatives on the prince, we may observe that among nations whose manners and political institutions are simple, the public, as well as individuals, having few wants, they are little acquainted with taxes, and free uncivilized tribes disdain to submit to uny stated imposition. This was remarkably the case of the Germans, and of all the various peo'ple that issued from that country. Tacitus pronounces two tribes not to be of German origin, because they submitted to pay taxes. (De Morib. Germ., c. 43.) And, speaking of another tribe according to the ideas prevalent in Germany, he says, " They were not degraded by the imposition of taxes." (Ibid., c. 29.) Upon the settle- ment of the Franks in Gaul we may conclude that, while elated with the consciousness of victory, they would not renounce the high-spirited ideas of their ancestors or voluntarily submit to a burden which they regarded as a badge of servitude. The evidence of the earliest records and historians justifies this conclusion. M. de Montesquieu, in the twelfth and subsequent chapters of the thirteenth book of L'Esprit des Loix, and M. de Mably, Observations sur 1'Histoire de France, torn. i. p. 247, have investigated this fact with great attention, and have proved clearly that the property of freemen among the Franks was not subject to any stated tax ; that the state required nothing from persons of this rank but military service at their own expense, and that they should entertain the king in their houses when he was upon any progress through his dominions, or his officers when sent on any public employment, furnishing them with carriages and horses. Monarchs subsisted almost entirely upon the revenues of their own domains, and upon the perquisites arising from the administration of justice, together with a few small fines and forfeitures exacted from such as had been guilty of certain trespasses. It is foreign from my subject to enumerate these. The reader may find them in Observations de M. de Mably, vol. i. p. 267. When any extraordinary aid was granted by freemen to their sovereign it was purely voluntary. In the annual assembly of March or May it was the custom to make the king a present of money, of horses or arms, or of some other thing of value. This was an ancient custom, and derived from their ancestors the Germans. " Mos est civitatibus, ultro ac viritim conferre principibus, vel armentorum, vel frugum, quod pro honore acceptum, etiam necessitatibus subvenit." (Tacit., de Mor. Germ., c, 15.) These gifts, if we may form a judgment concerning them from the general terms in which they are mentioned by the ancient historians, were considerable, and made no small part of the royal revenue. Many passages to this purpose are produced by M. Du Cange, Dissert. IV. sur Joinville, p. 153. Sometimes a conquered people specified the gift which they bound themselves to pay annually, and it was exacted as a debt if they failed. (Anales Metenses, ap. Du Cange, ibid., p. 155.) It is probable that the first step towards taxation was to ascertain the value of these gifts, which were originally gratuitous, and to compel the people NOTE xxxviii.] PitOOb'S AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 273 to pay the sum at which they were rated. Still, however, some memory of their original was preserved, and the aids granted to monarchs in all the kingdoms of Europe were termed benevolences or free gifts. The kings of the second race in France were raised to the throne by the election of the people. " Pepinus rex pius," says an author who wrote a few years after the transaction which he records, " per authoritatein papae, et unctionem sancti chrismatis et electionem omnium Francorum in regni solio sublimatus est." (Clausula de Pepini Con- secratione, ap. Bouq., Recueil des Histor., torn. v. p. 9.) At the same time, as the chief men of the nation had transferred the crown from one family to another, an oath was exacted of them that they should maintain on the throne the family which they had now promoted : " ut nunquam de alterius lumbis regem in aevo praesumant eligere." (Ibid., p. 10.) This oath the nation faithfully observed during a considerable space of time. The posterity of Pepin kept possession of the throne ; but with respect to the manner of dividing their dominions among their children, princes were obliged to consult the general assembly of the nation. Thus, Pepin himself, A.D. 768, appointed his two sons, Charles and Carlomannus, to reign as joint sovereigns ; but he did this " una cum consensu Francorum et procerum suorum seu et episcoporum," before whom he laid the matter in their general assembly. (Conventus apud Sanctum Dionysium, Capitular., vol. i. p. 187.) This destination the French confirmed in a subsequent assembly, which was called upon the death of Pepin ; for, as Eginhart relates, they not only appointed them kings, but by their authority they regulated the limits of their respective territories. (Vita Car. Magni, ap. Bouquet, Recueil, torn. v. p. 90.) In the same manner, it was by the authority of the supreme assemblies that any dispute which arose among the descendants of the royal family was determined. Charlemagne recognizes this important part of their jurisdiction, and confirms it, in his charter concerning the partition of his dominions ; for he appoints that, in case of any uncertainty with respect to the right of the several competitors, he whom the people choose shall succeed to the crown. Capitular., vol. i. p. 442. Under the second race of kings, the assemblies of the nation, dis- tinguished by the name of conventiis, malli, placita, were regularly assembled once a year at least, and frequently twice in the year. One of the most valuable monuments of the history of France is the treatise of Hincmarus, archbishop of Rheims, De Ordine Palatii. He died A.D. 882, only sixty-eight years after Charlemagne, and he relates in that short discourse the facts which were communicated to him by Adalhardus, a minister and confidant of Charlemagne. From him we learn that this great monarch never failed to hold the general assembly of his subjects every year. " In quo placito generalitas universorum majorum tarn clericorum quam laicorum conveniebat." (Hincm., Oper., edit. Sirmondi, vol. ii. c. 29, p. 211.) In these assemblies matters which related to the general safety and state of the kingdom were always discussed before they entered upon any private or less important business. (Ibid., c. 33, p. 213.) His immediate successors imitated his example, and transacted no affair of importance without the advice of their great council. Under the second race of kings the genius of the French government YOL. I. T 274 PEOOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE xxxvm. continued to be in a good measure democratical. The nobles, the dignified ecclesiastics, and the great officer? of the crown were not the only members of the national council ; the people, or the whole body of freemen, either in person or by their representatives, had a right to be present in it. Hincmarus, in describing the manner of holding the general assemblies, says that if the weather was favourable they met in the open air ; but if otherwise, they had different apartments allotted to them ; so that the dignified clergy were separated from the laity, and the " comites vel hujusmodi principes sibimet honorificabiliter a caetera nmltitudine segre- garentur." (Ibid., c. 35, p. 114.) Agobardus, archbishop of Lyons, thus describes a national council in the year 833, wherein he was present : " Qui ubique conventus extitit ex reverendissimis episcopis, et magnifi- centissimis viris illustribus, collegio quoque abbatuin et comitum, pro- miscuseque setatis et dignitatis populo." The ccetera multitude of Hincmarus is the same with the populus of Agobardus, and both describe the inferior order of freemen, the same who were afterwards known in France by the name of the third estate, and in England by the name of commons. The people, as well as the members of higher dignity, were admitted to a share of the legislative power. Thus, by a law, A.D. 803, it is ordained, " That the question shall be put to the people with respect to every new law, and if they shall agree to it they shall confirm it by their signature." (Capit., vol. i. p. 394.) There are two capitularia which convey to us a full idea of the part which the people took in the administration of government. When they felt the weight of any grievance, they had a right to petition the sovereign for redress. One of these petitions, in which they desire that ecclesiastics might be exempted from bearing arms and from serving in person against the enemy, is still extant. It is addressed to Charlemagne, A.D. 803, and expressed in such terms as could have been used only by men conscious of liberty, and of the extensive privileges which they possessed. They conclude with requiring him to grant their demand if he wished that they should any longer continue faithful subjects to him. That great monarch, instead of being offended or surprised at the boldness of their petition, received it in a most gracious manner, and signified his willingness to comply with it. But, sensible that he himself did not possess legislative authority, he promises to lay the matter before the next general assembly, that such things as were of common concern to all might be there considered and established by common consent. (Capitul., torn. i. pp. 405 409.) As the people by their petitions brought matters to be proposed in the general assembly, we learn from another capitulare the form in which they were approved there and enacted as laws. The propositions were read aloud, and then the people were required to declare whether they assented to them or not. They signified their assent by crying three times, " We are satisfied ; " and then the capitulare was confirmed by the subscription of the monarch, the clergy, and the chief men of the laity. (Capitul., torn. i. p. 627, A.D. 822.) It seems probable from a capitulare of Carolus Calvus, A.D. 851, that the sovereign could not refuse his assent to what was proposed and established by his subjects in the general assembly. (Tit. ix. 6 ; Capitul., vol. ii. p. 47.) It is unnecessary to multiply quotations con- cerning th*i legislative power of the national assembly of France under NOTE xxxix.] PEOOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 275 the second race, or concerning its right to determine with regard to peace and war. The uniform style of the Capitularia is an abundant confirma- tion of the former. The reader who desires any further information with respect to the latter may consult Les Origines ou 1'ancien Gouvemement de la France, etc., torn. iii. p. 87, etc. What has been said with respect to the admission of the people or their representatives into the supreme assembly merits attention, not only in tracing the progress of the French government, but on account of the light which it throws upon a similar question agitated in England concerning the time when the commons became part of the legislative body in that kingdom. NOTE XXXIX. SECT. III. p. 158 That important change which the constitution of France underwent when the legislative power was transferred from the great council of the nation to the king has been explained by the French antiquaries with less care than they bestow in illustrating other events in their history. For that reason I have endeavoured with greater attention to trace the steps which led to this memorable revolution. I shall here add some particulars which tend to throw additional light upon it. The Leges Salicae, the Leges Burgundionum, and other codes published by the several tribes which settled in Gaul were general laws extending to every person, to every province and district where the authority of those tribes was acknowledged. But they seem to have become obsolete ; and the reason of their falling into disuse is very obvious. Almost the whole property of the nation was allodial when these laws were framed. But when the ''eudal institutions became general, and gave rise to an infinite variety of questions peculiar to that species of tenure, the ancient codes were of no use in deciding with regard to these, because they could not contain regulations applicable to cases which did not exist at the time when they were compiled. This considerable change in the nature of property made it necessary to publish the new regulations contained in the capitularm, Many of these, as is evident from the perusal of them, were public laws extending to the whole French nation, in the general assembly of which they were enacted. The weakness of the greater part of the monarcha of the second race, and the disorder into which the nation was thrown by the depredations of the Normans, encouraged the barons to usurp an independent power formerly unknown in France. The nature and extent of that jurisdiction which they assumed I have formerly considered. The political union of the kingdom was at an end, its ancient constitution was dissolved, and only a feudal relation subsisted between the king and Ids vassals. The regal jurisdiction extended no further than the domains of the crown. Under the last kings of the second race these were reduced almost to nothing. Under the first kings of the third race they com- prehended little more than the patrimonial estate of Hugh Capet, which he annexed to the crown. Even with this accession they continued to be of small extent. (Velly, Hist de France, torn. iii. p. 32.) Many of the most considerable provinces in France did not at first acknowledge Hugh Capet as a lawful monarch. There are still extant several charters, granted during the first years of Ms reign, with this renutkable clause in T 2 276 PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE xxxnc. the form of dating the charter : " Deo regnante, rege expectante, regnante Domino nostro Jesu Christo Francis autem contra jus regnum usurpante Ugone rege." (Bouquet, Recueil, torn. x. p. 544.) A monarch whose title was thus openly disputed was not in a condition to assert the royal jurisdiction, or to limit that of the barons. All these circumstances rendered it easy for the barons to usurp the rights of royalty within their own territories. The Capitularia became no less obsolete than the ancient laws ; local customs were everywhere intro- duced, and became the sole rule by which all civil transactions were con- ducted and all causes were tried. The wonderful ignorance which became general in France during the ninth and tenth centuries contributed to the introduction of customary law. Few persons, except ecclesiastics, could read ; and as it was not in the power of such illiterate persons to have recourse to written laws, either as their guide in business or their rule in administering justice, the customary law, the knowledge of which was preserved by tradition, universally prevailed. During this period the general assembly of the nation seems not to have been called, nor to have once exerted its legislative authority. Local customs regulated and decided everything. A striking proof of this occurs in tracing the progress of the French jurisprudence. The last of the Capitularia collected by M. Baluze was issued in the year 921, by Charles the Simple. A hundred and thirty years elapsed from that period to the publication of the first ordinance of the kings of the third race, contained in the great collection of M. Lauriere, and the first ordi- nance which appears to be an act of legislation extending to the whole kingdom is that of Philip Augustus, A.D. 1 190. (Ordon., torn. i. pp. 1,18.) During that long period of two hundred and sixty-nine years all transac- tions were directed by local customs, and no addition was made to the statutory law of France. The ordinances previous to the reign of Philip Augustus contain regulations the authority of which did not extend beyond the king's domains. Various instances occur of the caution with which the kings of France ventured at first to exercise legislative authority. M. 1'Abbd de Mably produces an ordinance of Philip Augustus, A.D. 1206, concerning the Jews, who in that age were in some measure the property of the lord in whose territories they resided. But it is rather a treaty of the king with the Countess of Champagne and the Compte de Dampierre, than an act of royal power ; and the regulations in it seem to be established not so much by his authority as by their consent (Observat. sur 1'Hist. de France, ii p. 355.) In the same manner an ordinance of Louis VIII. concerning the Jews, A.D. 1223, is a contract between the king and his nobles with respect to their manner of treating that unhappy race of men. (Ordon. , torn, i p. 47.) The Establissemens of St. Louis, though well adapted to serve as general laws to the whole kingdom, were not published as such, but only as a complete code of customary law, to be of authority within the king's domains. The wisdom, the equity, and the order conspicuous in that code of St. Louis procured it a favourable reception throughout the kingdom. The veneration due to the virtues and good intentions of its author contributed not a little to reconcile the nation to that legislative authority which the king began to assume. Soon after the reign of NOTE XL.] PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 277 St. Louis, the idea of the king's possessing supreme legislative powei became common. " If," says Beaumanoir, " the king makes any estab- lishment specially for his own domain, the barons may nevertheless adhere to their ancient customs r t/ut if the establishment be general it shall be current throughout the whole kingdom, and we ought to believe that such establishments are made with mature deliberation, and for the general good." (Coust. de Beauvoisis, c. 48, p. 265.) Though the kings of the third race did not call the general assembly of the nation during the long period from Hugh Capet to Philip the Fair, yet they seem to have con- sulted the bishops and barons who happened to be present in their court, with respect to any new law which they published. Examples of this occur, Ordon., torn. L p. 3 et 5. This practice seems to have continued as late as the reign of St. Louis, when the legislative authority of the crown was well established. (Ordon., torn. L p. 58, A.D. 1246.) This attention paid to the barons facilitated the kings' acquiring such full possession of the legislative power as enabled them afterwards to exercise it without observing that formality. The assemblies distinguished by the name of the states-general were first called A.D. 1302, and were held occasionally from that period to the year 1614, since which time they have not been summoned. These were very different from the ancient assemblies of the French nation under the kings of the first and second race. There is no point with respect to which the French antiquaries are more generally agreed than in main- taining that the states-general had no suffrage in the passing of laws and possessed no proper legislative jurisdiction. The whole tenor of the French history confirms this opinion. The form of proceeding in the states-general was this. The king addressed himself, at opening the meeting, to the whole body assembled in one place, and laid before them the affairs on account of which he had summoned them. Then the depu- ties of each of the three orders, of nobles, of clergy, and of the third estate, met apart, and prepared their cahier, or memorial, containing their answer to the propositions which had been made to them, together with the representations which they thought proper to lay before the king. These answers and representations were considered by the king in his council, and generally gave rise to an ordinance. These ordinances were not addressed to the three estates in common. Sometimes the king ad- dressed an ordinance to each of the estates in particular. Sometimes he mentioned the assembly of the three estates. Sometimes mention is made only of the assembly of that estate to which the ordinance is addressed. Sometimes no mention at all is made of the assembly of estates, which suggested the propriety of enacting the law. Preface au torn. iii. des Ordon., p. xx. Thus the states-general had only the privilege of advising and remon- strating ; the legislative authority resided in the king alone. NOTE XL. Sect III. p. 162. If the parliament of Paris be considered only as the supreme court of justice, everything relative to its origin and jurisdiction is clear and obvious. It is the ancient court of the king's palace, new-modelled, 278 PROOFS AND ILLUSTEATIONS. [NOTE xu rendered stationary, arid invested with an extensive and ascertained juris- diction. The power of this court while employed in this part of its functions is not the object of present consideration. The pretensions of the parliament to control the exercise of the legislative authority, and its claim of a right to interpose with respect to public affairs and the political administration of the kingdom, lead to inquiries attended with great difficulty. As the officers and members of the parliament of Paris were anciently nominated by the king, were paid by him, and on several occa- sions were removed by him at pleasure (Chronic, scandaleuse de Louis XI. chez les Mem. de Comines, torn. ii. p. 51, edit, de M. Lenglet de Fresnoy), they cannot be considered as representatives of the people, nor could they claim any share in the legislative power as acting in their name. We must therefore search for some other source of this high privilege. 1. The parliament was originally composed of the most eminent persons in the kingdom. The peers of France, ecclesiastics of the highest order, and noblemen of illustrious birth, were members of it, to whom were added some clerks and councillors learned in the laws. (Pasquier, Recherches, p. 44, etc. ; Encyclopedic, torn, xii art. Parlement, pp. 3, 5.) A court thus constituted was properly a committee of the states-general of the kingdom, and was composed of those barons and fideles whom the kings of France were accustomed to consult with regard to every act of jurisdiction or legislative authority. It was natural, therefore, during the intervals between the meetings of the states-general, or during those periods when that assembly was not called, to consult the parliament, to lay matters of public concern before it, and to obtain its approbation and concurrence, before any ordinance was published, to which the people were required to conform. 2. Under the second race of kings, every new law was reduced into proper form by the chancellor of the kingdom, was proposed by him to the people, and, when enacted, was committed to him to be kept among the public records, that he might give authentic copies of it to all who should demand them. (Hincm., de Ord. Palat., c. 16 ; Capitul. Car. Calv., tit. xiv. 11, tit. xxxiii.) The chancellor presided in the parliament of Paris at its first institution. (Encyclopedic, torn. iii. art. Chancelier, p. 88.) It was, therefore, natural for the king to continue to employ him in his ancient functions of framing, taking into his custody, and publishing the ordinances which were issued. To an ancient copy of the Capitularia of Charlemagne the following words are subjoined : " Anno tertio clementis- simi domini nostri Caroli Augusti, sub ipso anno, hsec facta Capitula sunt, et consignata Stephano comiti, ut hsec manifesta faceret Parisiis mallo publico, et ilia legere faceret coram scabineis, quod ita et fecit, et omnes in uno consenserunt, quod ipsi voluissent observare usque in posterum, etiam omnes scabinei, episcopi, abbates, comites, manu propria subter signaverunt" (Bouquet, Recueil, torn. v. p. 663.) Mallus signifies not only the public assembly of the nation, but the court of justice held by the comes, or missus dominicus. Scabinei were the judges, or the assessors of the judges, in that court. Here, then, seems to be a very early instance not only of laws being published in a court of justice, but of their being verified or confirmed by the subscription of the judges. If this was the common practice, it naturally introduced the verifying of edicts in the parliament of Paris. But this conjecture I propose with that diffidence NOTE iL.] PROOFS AND ILLUSTEATIONS. 270 which I have felt in all my reasonings concerning the laws and institutions of foreign nations. 3. This supreme court of justice in France was digni- fied with the appellation of parliament, the name by which the general assembly of the nation was distinguished towards the close of the second race of kings ; and men, both in reasoning and in conduct, were wonder- fully influenced by the similarity of names. The preserving the ancient names of the magistrates established while the republican government subsisted in Home enabled Augustus and his successors to assume new powers with less observation and greater ease. The bestowing the same name in France upon two courts which were extremely different contri- buted not a little to confound their jurisdictions and functions. All these circumstances concurred in leading the kings of France to avail themselves of the parliament of Paris as the instrument of reconciling the people to the exercise of legislative authority by the crown. The French, accustomed to see all new laws examined and authorized before they were published, did not sufficiently distinguish between the effect of performing this in the national assembly or in a court appointed by the king. But as that court was composed of respectable members, and who were well skilled in the laws of their country, when any new edict received its sanction, that was sufficient lo dispose the people to submit to it. When the practice of verifying and registering the royal edicts in the parliament of Paris became common, the parliament contended that this was necessary in order to give them legal authority. It was established as a fundamental maxim in French jurisprudence that no law could be pub- lished in any other manner ; that without this formality no edict or ordi- nance could have any effect ; that the people were not bound to obey it, and ought not to consider it as an edict or ordinance, until it was verified in the supreme court after free deliberation. (Roche-flavin des Parlemens de France, 4to, Gen., 1621, p. 921.) The parliament, at different times, hath, with great fortitude and integrity, opposed the will of their sovereigns, and, notwithstanding their repeated and peremptory requisitions and com- mands, hath refused to verify and publish such edicts as it conceived to be oppressive to the people or subversive of the constitution of the kingdom. Roche-flavin reckons that between the year 1562 and the year 1589 the parliament refused to verify more than a hundred edicts of the kings. (Ibid., 925.) Many instances of the spirit and constancy with which the parliaments of France opposed pernicious laws and asserted their own pri- vileges are enumerated by Limnaeus in his Notitise Regni Franciae, lib. i. c. 9, p. 224. But the power of the parliament to maintain and defend this privilege bore no proportion to its importance, or to the courage with which the members asserted it. When any monarch was determined that an edict should be carried into execution, and found the parliament inflexibly re- solved not to verify or publish it, he could easily supply this defect by the plenitude of his regal power. He repaired to the parliament in person, he took possession of his seat of justice, and commanded the edict to be read, verified, registered, and published in his presence. Then, according to another maxim of French law, the king himself being present, neither the parliament nor any magistrate whatever can exercise any authority or per- form any function. " Adveniente principe, cessat magistrates." (Roche- 280 PEOOFe AND ILLUSTEATIONS. [NOTE XLII. flavin, ibid., pp. 928, 929 ; Encyclopedic, torn, be., art. Lit. de Justice, p. 581.) Eoche-flavin mentions several instances of kings who actually exerted this prerogative, so fatal to the residue of the rights and liberties transmitted to the French by their ancestors. Pasquier produces some instances of the same kind. (Eech., p. 61.) Limnseus enumerates many other instances ; but the length to which this note has swelled prevents me from inserting them at length, though they tend greatly to illustrate this important article in the French history (p. 245). Thus, by an exertion of prerogative which, though violent, seems to be constitutional, and is justi- fied by innumerable precedents, all the efforts of the parliament to limit and control the king's legislative authority are rendered ineffectual. I have not attempted to explain the constitution or jurisdiction of any parliament in France but that of Paris. All of them are formed upon the model of that most ancient and respectable tribunal, and all my observa- tions concerning it will apply with full force to them. NOTB XLL Sect III. p. 166. The humiliating posture in which a great emperor implored absolution is an event so singular that the words in which Gregory himself describes it merit a place here, and convey a striking picture of the arrogance of that pontiff : " Per triduum, ante portam castri, deposito ornni regio cultu, miserabiliter, utpote discalceatus, et laneis indutus, persistens, non prius cum multo fletu apostolicae miserationis auxilium et consolationem implorari destitit, quam omnes qui ibi aderant, et ad quos rumor ille pervenit, ad tun tarn pietatem, et compassionis misericordiam movit, ut pro eo multis preci- bus et lacrymis intercedentes, omnes quidem insolitam nostrje mentis duri- tiem mirarentur ; nonnulli vero in nobis non apostolicsD sedis gravitatem, sed quasi tyrannicse feritatis crudelitatem esse clamarunt" Epist Gregor., ap. Memorie della Contessa Matilda da Fran. Mar. Fiorentini, Lucca, 1756, voL i p. 174. NOTE XLII. Sect III. p. 174. As I have endeavoured in the history to trace the various steps in the progress of the constitution of the empire, and to explain the peculiari- ties in its policy very fully, it is not necessary to add much by way of illustration. What appears to be of any importance I shall range under distinct heads. 1. With respect to the power, jurisdiction, and revenue of the emperors. A very just idea of these may be formed by attending to the view which Pfeffel gives of the rights of the emperors at two different periods. The first at the close of the Saxon race, A.D. 1024. These, according to his enumeration, were the right of conferring all the great ecclesiastical bene- fices in Germany ; of receiving the revenues of them during a vacancy ; of mortmain, or of succeeding to the effects of ecclesiastics who died intestate. The right of confirming or of annulling the elections of the popes. The right of assembling councils, and of appointing their* to decide concerning the affairs of the Church. The right of conferring the title of king upon their vassals. The right of granting vacant fiefs. The right of receiving NOTE XLII.] PEOOFS AND ILLUSTBATIONS. 281 the revenues of the empire, whether arising from the imperial domains, from imposts and tolls, from gold or silver mines, from the taxes paid by the Jews, or from forfeitures. The right of governing Italy as its proper sove- reigns. The right of erecting free cities and of establishing fairs in them. The right of assembling the diets of the empire and of fixing the time of their duration. The right of coining money, and of conferring that privi- lege on the states of the empire. The right of administering both high and low justice within the territories of the different states. (Abre'ge, p. 160.) The other period is at the extinction of the emperors of the families of Luxemburg and Bavaria, A.D. 1437. According to the same author, the imperial prerogatives at that time were the right of conferring all dignities and titles, except the privilege of being a state of the empire. The right of preces primaries, or of appointing once during their reign a dignitary in each chapter or religious house. The right of granting dispen- sations with respect to the age of majority. The right of erecting cities, and of conferring the privilege of coining money. The right of calling the meetings of the diet and of presiding in them. (Abrdge*, etc., p. 507.) It were easy to show that Mr. Pfeffel is well founded in all these assertions, and confirm them by the testimony of the most respectable authors. In the one period the emperors appear as mighty sovereigns with extensive prerogatives ; in the other, as the heads of a confederacy with very limited powers. The revenues of the emperors decreased still more than their authority. The early emperors, and particularly those of the Saxon line, besides their great patrimonial or hereditary territories, possessed an extensive domain both in Italy and Germany, which belonged to them as emperors. Italy belonged to the emperors as their proper kingdom, and the revenues which they drew from it were very considerable. The first alienations of the imperial revenue were made in that country. The Italian cities, having acquired wealth, and aspiring at independence, purchased their liberty from different emperors, as I have observed, Note XV. The sums which they paid, and the emperors with whom they concluded these bargains, are men- tioned by Gasp. Klockius de JSrario, Norimb., 1671, p. 85, etc. Charles IV. and his son Wenceslaus dissipated all that remained of the Italian branch of the domain. The German domain lay chiefly upon the banks of the Rhine, and was under the government of the counts palatine. It is not easy to mark out the boundaries or to estimate the value of this ancient domain, which has been so long incorporated with the territories of different princes. Some hints with respect to it may be found in the glossary of Speidelius, which he has entitled Speculum Juridico-Philologico-Politico- Historicum Observationum, etc., Norimb., 1673, voL L pp. 679, 1045. A more full account of it is given by Klockius de JSrario, p. 84. Besides this, the emperors possessed considerable districts of land lying intermixed with the estates of the dukes and barons. They were accustomed to visit these frequently, and drew from their vassals in each what was sufficient to support their court during the time of their residence among them. (An- nalistse, ap. Struv., torn. i. p. 611.) A great part of these detached posses- sions was seized by the nobles during the long interregnum, or during the wars occasioned by the contests between the emperors and the court of Rome. At the same time that such encroachments were made on the filed 282 PROOFS AND ILLUSTEATIONS. [NOTE XLII. or territorial property of the emperors, they were robbed almost entirely of their casual revenues, the princes and barons appropriating to themselves taxes and duties of every kind, which had usually been paid to them. (Pfeffel, Abre'ge', p. 374.) The profuse and inconsiderate ambition of Charles IV. squandered whatever remained of the imperial revenues after so many defalcations. He, in the year 1376, in order to prevail with the electors to choose his son Wenceslaus king of the Romans, promised each of them a hundred thousand crowns. But being unable to pay so large a sum, and eager to secure the election to his son, he alienated to the three eccle- siastical electors, and to the count palatine, such countries as still belonged to the imperial domain on the banks of the Rhine, and likewise made over to them all the taxes and tolls then levied by the emperors in that district. Trithemius, and the author of the Chronicle of Magdeburg, enumerate the territories and the taxes which were thus alienated, and represent this as the last and fatal blow to the imperial authority. (Struv., Corp., vol. i. p. 437.) From that period the shreds of the ancient revenues possessed by the emperors have been so inconsiderable that, in the opinion of Speidelius, all that they yield would be so far from defraying the expense of support- ing their household that they would not pay the charge of maintaining the posts established in the empire. (Speidelii Speculum, etc., vol. i. p. 680.) These funds, inconsiderable as they were, continued to decrease. Granvelle, the minister of Charles V., asserted in the year 1546, in presence of several of the German princes, that his master drew no money at all from the empire. (Sleid., History of the Reformation, Lond., 1689, p. 372.) The same is the case at present. (Traits' du Droit publique de 1'Empire, par M. le Coq de Villeray, p. 55.) From the reign of Charles IV., whom Maximilian called the " pest of the empire," the emperors have depended entirely on their hereditary dominions as the chief and almost the only source of their power, and even of their subsistence. 2. The ancient mode of electing the emperors, and the various changes which it underwent, require some illustration. The imperial crown was originally attained by election, as well as those of most monarchies in Europe. An opinion long prevailed among the antiquaries and public lawyers of Germany that the right of choosing the emperors was vested in the archbishops of Mentz, Cologne, and Treves, the king of Bohemia, the duke of Saxony, the marquis of Brandenburg, and the count palatine of the Rhine, by an edict of Otho III., confirmed by Gregory V. about the year !J96. But the whole tenor of history contradicts this opinion. It appears that from the earliest period in the history of Germany the person who was to reign over all was elected by the suffrage of all. Thus, Conrad I. was elected by all the people of the Franks, say some annalists ; by all the princes and chief men, say others ; by all the nations, say others. (See their words, Struv., Corp., p. 211 ; Conringius de German. Imper. Repub. Acroamata Sex., Ebroduni, 1654, p. 103.) In the year 1024, posterior to the supposed regulations of Otho III., Conrad II. was elected by all the chief men, and his election was approved and confirmed by the people. (Struv., Corp., p. 284.) At the election of Lotharius II., A.D. 1125, sixty thousand persons of all ranks were present. He was named by the chief men, and their nomination was approved by the people. (Struv., Corp., p. 357.) The first author who mentions the seven electors is Martinus NOTE xi.ii.] PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 283 Polonus, who flourished in the reign of Frederic II., which ended A.D. 1250. We find that in all the ancient elections to which I have referred the princes of the greatest power and authority were allowed by their coun- trymen to name the person whom they wished to appoint emperor, and the people approved or disapproved of their nomination. This privilege of voting first is called by the German lawyers the right of prcetaocation. (PfefFel, Abre'ge', p. 316.) This was the first origin of the exclusive right which the electors acquired. The electors possessed the most extensive territories of any princes in the empire ; all the great offices of the state were in their hands by hereditary right ; as soon as they obtained or engrossed so much influence in the election as to be allowed the right of prsetaxation, it was vain to oppose their will, and it even became unneces- sary for the inferior ecclesiastics and barons to attend, when they had no other function but that of confirming the deed of these more powerful princes by their assent. During times of turbulence, the subordinate members of the Germanic body could not resort to the place of election without a retinue of armed vassals, the expense of which they were obliged to defray out of their own revenues ; and, finding their attendance to be unnecessary, they were unwilling to waste them to no purpose. The rights of the seven electors were supported by all the descendants and allies of their powerful families, who shared in the splendour and influence ivhich they enjoyed by this distinguishing privilege. (Pfeffel, Abrege*, p. 376.) The seven electors were considered as the representatives of all the orders which composed the highest class of German nobility. There were three archbishops, chancellors of the three great districts into which the empire was anciently divided, one king, one duke, one marquis, and one count. All these circumstances contributed to render the introduction of this considerable innovation into the constitution of the Germanic body extremely easy. Every thing of importance relating to this branch of the political state of the empire is well illustrated by Onuphrius Panvanius, an Augustinian monk of Verona, who lived in the reign of Charles V. His treatise, if we make some allowance for that partiality which he expresses in favour of the powers which the popes claimed in the empire, has the merit of being one of the first works in which a controverted point in history is examined with critical precision and with a proper atten- tion to that evidence which is derived from records or the testimony of contemporary historians. It is inserted by Goldastus in his Politica Imperialia, p. 2. As the electors have engrossed the sole right of choosing the emperors, they have assumed likewise that of deposing them. This high power the electors have not only presumed to claim, but have ventured, in more than one instance, to exercise. In the year 1298 a part of the electors deposed Adolphus of Nassau and substituted Albert of Austria in his place. The reasons on which they found their sentence show that this deed flowec 1 from factious, not from public-spirited, motives. (Struv., Corp., vol. i. p. 540.) In the first year of the fifteenth century the electors deposed Wenceslaus and placed the imperial crown on the head of Rupert, elector palatine. The act of deposition is still extant. (Goldasti Constit., vol. i p. 379.) It is pronounced in the name and by the authority of the doctors, and confirmed by several prelates and barons of the empire, 284 PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE xm. who were present. These exertions of the electoral power demonstrate that the imperial authority was sunk very low. The other privileges of the electors, and the rights of the electoral college, are explained by the writers on the public law in Germany. 3. With respect to the diets, or general assemblies of the empire, it would be necessary, if my object were to write a particular history of Germany, to enter into a minute detail concerning the forms of assembling them, the persons who have a right to be present, their division into several colleges or benches, the objects of their deliberation, the mode in which they carry on their debates or give their suffrages, and the authority of their decrees or recesses. But, as my only object is to give the outlines of the constitution of the German empire, it will be sufficient to observe that originally the diets of the empire were exactly the same with the assemblies of March and of May, held by the kings of France. They met at least once a year. Every freeman had a right to be present. They were assemblies in which a monarch deliberated with his subjects concerning their common interest. (Arumseus de Comitiis Rom. German. Imperil, 4to, Jenae, 1660, cap. 7, no. 20, etc.) But when the princes, dignified ecclesiastics, and barons acquired territorial and in- dependent jurisdiction, the diet became an assembly of the separate states, which formed the confederacy of which the emperor was head. While the constitution of the empire remained in its primitive form, attendance on the diets was a duty, like the other services due from feudal subjects to their sovereign, which the members were bound to perform in person ; and if any member who had a right to be present in the diet neglected to attend in person, he not only lost his vote, but was liable to a heavy penalty. (Arumaeus de Comit., c. 5, no. 40.) Whereas, from the time that the members of the diet became independent states, the right of suffrage was annexed to the territory or dignity, not to the person. The members, if they could not, or would not, attend in person, might send their deputies, as princes send ambassadors, and they were entitled to exercise all the rights belonging to their constituents. (Ibid., no. 42, 46, 49.) By degrees, and upon the same principle of considering the diet as an assembly of independent states, in which each confederate had the right of suffrage, if any member possessed more than one of those states or characters which entitle to a seat in the diet, he was allowed a proportional number of suffrages. (Pfeffel, Abre'ge, p. 622.) From the same cause, the imperial cities, as soon as they became free and acquired supreme and independent jurisdiction within their own territories, were received as members of the diet. The powers of the diet extend to every thing relative to the common concern of the Germanic body or that can interest or affect it as a confederacy. The diet takes no cognizance of the interior administra- tion in the different states, unless that happens to disturb or threaten the general safety. 4. With respect to the imperial chamber, the jurisdiction of which has been the great source of order and tranquillity in Germany, it is necessary to observe that this court was instituted in order to put an end to the calamities occasioned by private wars in Germany. I have already traced the rise and progress of this practice, and pointed out its pernicious effects as fully as their extensive influence during the Middle Ages required. In WOTE XLII.] PEOOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. 285 Germany, private wars seem to have been more frequent and productive of worse consequences than in the other countries of Europe. There are obvious reasons for this. The nobility of Germany were extremely numer- ous, and the causes of their dissension multiplied in proportion. The territorial jurisdiction which the German nobles acquired was more com- plete than that possessed by their order in other nations. They became, in reality, independent powers, and they claimed all the privileges of that character. The long interregnum from A.D. 1256 to A.D. 1273 accus- tomed them to an uncontrolled license, and led them to forget that subor- dination which is necessary in order to maintain public tranquillity. At the time when the other monarchs of Europe began to acquire such an increase of power and revenues as added new vigour to their government, the autho- rity and revenues of the emperors continued gradually to decline. The diets of the empire, which alone had authority to judge between such mighty barons, and power to enforce its decisions, met very seldom. (Conring., Acroamata, p. 234.) The diets, when they did assemble, were often composed of several thousand members (Chronic. Constant., ap. Struv., Corp., i. 546), and were tumultuary assemblies, ill qualified to decide concerning any question of right. The session of the diet con- tinued only two or three days (Pfeffel, Abre'ge, p. 244) ; so that they had no time to hear or discuss any cause that was in the smallest degree intricate. Thus Germany was left, in some measure, without any court of judicature capable of deciding the contests between its more powerful members, or of repressing the evils occasioned by their private wars. All the expedients which were employed in other countries of Europe in order to restrain this practice, and which I have described, Note XXL, were tried in Germany with little effect. The confederacies of the nobles and of the cities, and the division of Germany into various circles, which I mentioned in that note, were found likewise insufficient. As a last remedy, the Germans had recourse to arbiters, whom they called austregce. The barons and states in different parts of Germany joined in conven- tions, by which they bound themselves to refer all controversies that might arise between them to the determination of austregce, and to submit to their sentences as final These arbiters are named sometimes in the treaty of convention, an instance of which occurs in Ludewig, Reliquiae Manuscr. omnis Mvi, vol. ii. p. 212 ; sometimes they were chosen by mutual consent upon occasion of any contest that arose ; sometimes they were appointed by neutral persons ; and sometimes the choice was left to be decided by lot. (Datt., de Pace Publica Imperii, lib. i. cap. 27, no. 60, etc.; Speidelius, Speculum, etc., voc. Austmg., p. 95.) Upon the intro- duction of this practice, the public tribunals of justice became in a great measure useless, and were almost entirely deserted. In order to re-establish the authority of government, Maximilian I. instituted the imperial chamber at the period which I have mentioned. This tribunal consisted originally of a president, who was always a noble- man of the n st order, and of sixteen judges. The president was appointed by the emperor, and the judges partly by him, and partly by the states, according to forms which it is unnecessary to describe. A sum was imposed, with their own consent, on the states of the empire, for paying the salaries of the judges and officers in this court The imperial 286 PROOFS AND ILLUSTEATIONS. [NOTE xun. chamber was established first at Frankfort-on-the-Main. During the reign of Charles V. it was removed to Spires, and continued in that city above a century and a half. It is now fixed at "Wetzlar. This court takes cognizance of all questions concerning civil right between the states of the empire, and passes judgment in the last resort, and without appeal. To it belongs likewise the privilege of judging in criminal causes, which may be considered as connected with the preservation of the public peace. Pfeffel, Abrege", p. 560. All causes relating to points of feudal right or jurisdiction, together with such as respect the territories which hold of the empire in Italy, belong properly to the jurisdiction of the aulic council. This tribunal was formed upon the model of the ancient court of the palace instituted by the emperors of Germany. It depended not upon the states of the empire, but upon the emperor, he having the right of appointing at pleasure all the judges of whom it is composed. Maximilian, in order to procure some compensation for the diminution of his authority by the powers vested in the imperial chamber, prevailed on the diet, A.D. 1512, to give its consent to the establishment of the aulic council. Since that time it has been a great object of policy in the court of Vienna to extend the jurisdiction and support the authority of the aulic council, and to circumscribe and weaken those of the imperial chamber. The tedious forms and dilatory proceedings of the imperial chamber have furnished the emperors with pretexts for doing so. " Lites Spirse," according to the witticism of a German lawyer, " spirant, sed nunquam expirant." Such delays are unavoidable in a court composed of members named by many different states jealous of each other. Whereas the judges of the ;iulic council, depending upon one master, and being responsible to him filone, are more vigorous and decisive. Puffendorf, De Statu Imper. German., cap. y. 20 ; Pfeffel, Abrege', p. 581. Nora XLIII. Sect. III. p. 177. The description which I have given of the Turkish government is con- formable to the accounts of the most intelligent travellers who have visited that empire. The Count de Marsigli, in his treatise concerning the mili- tary state of the Turkish empire, ch. vi, and the author of Observations on the Religion, Laws, Government, and Mann- rs of the Turks, published at London, 1768, vol. i. p. 81, differ from other writers who have described the political constitution of that powerful monarchy. As they had oppor- tunity, during their long residence in Turkey, to observe the order and justice conspicuous in several departments of administration, they seem unwilling to admit that it should be denominated a despotism. But when the form of government in any country is represented to be despotic, this does not suppose that the power of the monarch is continually exerted in acts of violence, injustice, and cruelty. Under political constitutions of every species, unless when some frantic tyrant happens to hold the sceptre, the ordinary administration of government must be conformable to the principles of justice, and, if not active in promoting the welfare of the people, cannot certainly have their destruction for its object. A state in which the sovereign possesses the absolute command of a vast military NOTB JLLUI.] PEOOFS AND ILLUSTEATIONS. 287 force, together with the disposal of an extensive revenue, in which the people have no privileges and no part either immediate or remote in legis- lation, in which there is no body of hereditary nobility, jealous of their own rights and distinctions, to stand as an intermediate order between the prince and the people, cannot be distinguished by any name but that of a despotism. The restraints, however, which I have mentioned, arising from the capiculy and from religion, are powerful. But they are not such as change the nature or denomination of the government. When a despotic prince employs an armed force to support his authority, he commits the supreme power to their hands. The praetorian bands in Rome dethroned, murdered, and exalted their princes in the same waiiion manner with the soldiery of the Porte at Constantinople. But, notwithstanding this, the Roman emperors have been considered by all political writers as possessing despotic powers. The author of Observations on the Religion, Laws, Government, and Manners of the Turks, in a preface to the second edition of his work, hath made some remarks on what ia contained in this note and in that part of the text to which it refers. It is with diffidence I set my opinion in opposition to that of a person who has observed the government of the Turks with attention and has described it with abilities. But, after a careful review of the subject, to me the Turkish government still appears of such a species as can be ranged in no class but that to which political writers have given the name of despotism. There is not in Turkey any constitutional restraint upon the will of the sovereign, or any barrier to circumscribe the exercise of his power, but the two which I have men- tioned : one afforded by religion, the principle upon which the authority of the sultan is founded, the other by the army, the instrument which he must employ to maintain his power. The author represents the iilema, or body of the law, as an intermediate order between the monarch and the people. (Pref., p. 30.) But whatever restraint the authority of the ulema may impose upon the sovereign is derived from religion. The moulahs out of whom the mufti and other chief officers of the law must be chosen, are ecclesiastics. It is as interpreters of the Koran or divine will that they are objects of veneration. The check, then, which they give to the exercise of arbitrary power is not different from one of those of which I took notice. Indeed, this restraint cannot be very considerable. The mufti, who is the head of the order, as well as every inferior officer of law, is named by the sultan, and is removable at his pleasure. The straii^e means employed by the ulema in 1 746 to obtain the dismission of a minister whom they hated is a manifest proof that they possess but little constitutional authority which can serve as a restraint upon the will of the sovereign. (Observat., p. 92 of 2d edit.) If the author's idea be just, it is astonishing that the body of the law should have no method of remonstrating against the errors of administration but by setting fire to the capital. The author seems to consider the capiculy, or soldiery of the Porte, neither as formidable instruments of the sultan's power nor as any restraint upon the exercise of it. His reasons for this opinion are that the number of the capiculy is small in proportion to the other troops which compose the Turkish armies, and that in time of peace they are undisciplined. 288 PEOOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE XLIV. (Pref., 2d edit., p. 23, etc.) But the troops stationed in a capital, though their number be not great, are always masters of the sovereign's person and power. The praetorian bands bore no proportion to the legionary troops in the frontier provinces. The soldiery of the Porte are more numerous, and must possess power of the same kind, and be equally formidable, sometimes to the sovereign, and oftener to the people. However much the discipline of the janizaries may be neglected at present, it certainly was not so in that age to which alone my description of the Turkish government applies. The author observes (Pref., p. 29) that the janizaries never deposed any sultan of themselves, but that some form of law, true or false, has been observed, and that either the mufti, or some other minister of religion, has announced to the unhappy prince the law which renders him unworthy of the throne. (Observ., p. 102.) This will always happen. In every revolution, though brought about by military power, the deeds of the sol- diery must be confirmed and carried into execution with the civil and reli- gious formalities peculiar to the constitution. This addition to the note may serve as a further illustration of my own sentiments, but is not made with an intention of entering into any controversy with the author of Observations, etc., to whom I am indebted for the obliging terms in which he has expressed his remarks upon what I had advanced. Happy were it for such as ventured to communicate their opinions to the world, if every animadversion upon them were conveyed with the same candid and liberal spirit. In one particular, however, he seems to have misapprehended what I meant. (Pref., p. 17.) I certainly did not mention his or Count Marsigli's long residence in Turkey as a cir- cumstance which should detract from the weight of their authority. I took notice of it in justice to my readers, that they might receive my opinion with distrust, as it differed from that of persons whose means of information were so far superior to mine. NOTE: XLIV. Sect III. p. 178. The institution, the discipline, and privileges of the janizaries are described by all the authors who give any account of the Turkish govern- ment. The manner in which enthusiasm was employed in order to inspire them with courage is thus related by Prince Cantemir : " When Amurath I. had formed them into a body, he sent them to Haji Bektash, a Turkish saint, famous for his miracles and prophecies, desiring him to bestow on them a banner, to pray God for their success, and to give them a name. The saint, when they appeared in his presence, put the sleeve of his gown upon one of their heads, and said, Let them be called Yengicheri. Let their countenance be ever bright, their hands victorious, their swords keen ; let their spear always hang over the heads of their enemies, and wherever they go, may they return with a shining face." (History of the Ottoman Empire, p. 38.) The number of janizaries at the first institution of the body was not considerable. Under Solyman, in the year 1521, they amounted to twelve thousand. Since that time their number has greatly increased. (Marsigli, Etat etc., ch. xvi. p. 68.) Though Soly- man possessed such abilities and authority as to restrain this formidable body within the bounds of obedience, yet its tendency to limit the power NOTE XLV.] PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. of the sultans was, even in that age, foreseen by sagacious observers. Nicolas Daulphinois, who accompanied M. d'Aramon, ambassador from Henry II. of France to Solyman, published an account of his travels, in which he describes and celebrates the discipline of the janizaries, but at the same time predicts that they would one day become formidable to their masters, and act the same part at Constantinople as the praetorian bands had done at Rome. Collection of Voyages from the Earl of Oxford's Library, voL i. p. 699. NOTE XLV. Sect III. p. 168. Solyman the Magnificent, to whom the Turkish historians have given the surname of canuni, or insti tutor of rules, first brought the finances and military establishment of the Turkish empire into a regular form. He divided the military force into the capiculy, or soldiery of the Porte, which was properly the standing army, and serrataculy, or soldiers appointed to guard the frontiers. The chief strength of the latter consisted of those who held timariots and ziams. These were portions of land granted to certain persons for life, in much the same manner as the military fiefs among the nations of Europe, in return for which military service was performed. Solyman, in his Canun-Nam, or book of regulations, fixed with great accuracy the extent of these lands in each province of his empire, appointed the precise number of soldiers each person who held a timariot or a ziam should bring into the field, and established the pay which they should receive while engaged in service. Count Marsigli and Sir Paul Rycaut have given extracts from this book of regulations, and it appears that the ordinary establishment of the Turkish army exceeded a hundred and fifty thousand men. When these were added to the soldiery of the Porte, they formed a military power greatly superior to what any Christian state could command in the sixteenth century. (Marsigli, Etat Militaire, etc., p. 136 ; Rycaut's State of the Ottoman Empire, book iii. ch. ii.) As Solyman, during his active reign, was engaged so constantly in war, that his troops were always in the field, the serrataculy became almost equal to the janizaries themselves in discipline and valour. It is not surprising, then, that the authors of the sixteenth century should represent the Turks as far superior to the Christians both in the knowledge and in the practice of the art of war. Quicciardini informs us that the Italians learned the art of fortifying towns from the Turks. (Histor., lib. xv. p. 266.) Busbequius, who was ambassador from the emperor Ferdinand to Solyman, and who had opportunity to observe the state both of the Christian and Turkish armies, published a discourse concerning the best manner of carrying on war against the Turks, in which he points out at great length the immense advantages which the infidels possessed with respect to discipline and military improvements of every kind. (Busbequii Opera, edit. Elzevir, p. 393, etc.) The testimony of other authors might be added, if the matter were in any degree doubtful. Before I conclude these Proofs and Illustrations, I ought to explain the reason of two omissions in them : one of which it is necessary to mention VOL. T. V 290 PROOFS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. [NOTE XLV. on my own account, the other to obviate an objection to this part of the work. In all my inquiries and disquisitions concerning the progress of govern- ment, manners, literature, and commerce during the Middle Ages, as well as in my delineations of the political constitution of the different states of Europe at the opening of the sixteenth century, I have not once mentioned M. de Voltaire, who in his Essai sur I'Histoire generale has reviewed the same period, and has treated of all these subjects. This does not proceed from an inattention to the works of that extraordinary man, whose genius, no less enterprising than universal, has attempted almost eveiy different species of literary composition. In many of these he excels. In all, if he had left religion untouched, he is instructive and agreeable. But, as he seldom imitates the example of modern historians in citing the authors from whom they derived their information, I could not with propriety appeal to his authority in confirmation of any doubtful or unknown fact. I have often, however, followed him as my guide in these researches ; and he has not only pointed out the facts with respect to which it was of importance to inquire, but the conclusions which it was proper to draw from them. If he had at the same time mentioned the books which relate these particulars, a great part of my labour would have been unnecessary, and many of his readers who now consider him only as an entertaining and lively writer would find that he is a learned and well-informed historian. As to the other omission, every intelligent reader must have observed that I have not entered, either in the historical part of this volume or in the Proofs and Illustrations, into the same detail with respect to the ancient laws and customs of the British kingdoms as concerning those of the other European nations. As the capital facts with regard to the progress of government and manners in their own country are known to most of my readers, such a detail appeared to me to be less essential. Such facts and observations, however, as were necessary towards completing my design in this part of the work, I have mentioned under the different articles which are the subjects of my disquisitions. The state of government in all the nations of Europe having been nearly the same during several ages, nothing can tend more to illustrate the progress of the English constitution than a careful inquiry into the laws and customs of the kingdoms on the Continent. This source of information has been too much neglected by the English antiquaries and lawyers. Filled with admiration of that happy constitution now established in Great Britain, they have been more attentive to its forms and principles than to the condition and ideas of remote times, which in almost every particular differ from the present. While engaged in per- using the laws, charters, and early historians of the Continental kingdoms, I have often been led to think that an attempt to illustrate the progress of English jurisprudence and policy by a comparison with those of other kingdoms in a similar situation would be of great utility, and might throw much light on some points which are now obscure, and decide others which h;we been long controverted. HISTORY OF THE REIGN OF THE EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. HISTORY OF THE EEIGN OT THX EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. BOOK I. Birth of Charles V. His Hereditary Dominions. Philip and Joanna, his Parents. Birth of Ferdinand, his Brother. Death of Isabella, Philip's Attempts to obtain the Government of Castile, The Regent Ferdinand marries a Niece of the French King to exclude Philip and his. Daughter. The Castilian Nobility declare for Philip. Philip and Joanna proclaimed. Death of Philip. Incapacity of Joanna. Ferdinand made Regent. His Acquisition of Territory. His Death. Education of Charles V. Cardinals Ximenes and Adrian. Charles acknowledged King. Ximeues strengthens the Royal Power; is opposed by the Nobles. War in Navarre and in Africa. Peace with France, Charles visits Spain. His Ingrati- tude towards Ximenes. Death of the Latter. Discontent of the Castilians. Corruption of the King's Flemish Favourites. Recep- tion of Charles in Aragon. Death of the Emperor Maximilian. Charles and Francis I. Competitors for the Empire. Views of the other Reigning Potentates. Assembly of the Electors. The Crown offered to Frederic of Saxony. He declines in Favour of Charles, who is chosen. Discontent of the Spaniards. Insurrection in Valencia. The Cortes of Castile summoned to meet in Galicia. Charles appoints Regents, and embarks for the Low Countries. CHARLES V. was born at Ghent on the 24th day of February, in the year 1500. His father, Philip the Handsome, archduke of Austria, was the son of the emperor Maximilian, and of Mary, the only child of Charles the Bold, the last prince of the house of Bur- gundy. His mother, Joanna, was the second daughter 294 EEIGN OF THE [BOOK i. of Ferdinand, king of Aragon, and of Isabella, queen of Castile. A long train of fortunate events had opened the way for this young prince to the inheritance of more exten- sive dominions than any European monarch since Charle- magne had possessed. Each of his ancestors had acquired kingdoms or provinces towards which their prospect of succession was extremely remote. The rich possessions of Mary of Burgundy had been destined for another family, she having been contracted by her father to the only son of Louis XI. of France ; but that capricious monarch, indulging his hatred to her family, chose rather to strip her of part of her territories by force than to secure the whole by marriage ; and by this misconduct, fatal to his posterity, he threw all the Netherlands and Franche-Comte into the hands of a rival. Isabella, the daughter of John II. of Castile, far from having any prospect of that noble inheritance which she transmitted to her grandson, passed the early part of her life in obscurity and indigence. But the Castilians, exasperated against her brother, Henry IV., an ill-advised and vicious prince, publicly charged him with impotence and his queen with adultery. Upon his demise, rejecting Joanna, whom Henry had uniformly, and even on his death-bed, owned to be his lawful daughter, and whom an assembly of the states had acknowledged to be the heir of his kingdom, they obliged her to retire into Portugal and placed Isabella on the throne of Castile. Ferdinand owed the crown of Aragon to the unexpected death of his elder brother, and acquired the kingdoms of Naples and Sicily by violating the faith of treaties and disregarding the ties of blood. To all these kingdoms. Christopher Columbus, by an effort of genius and of intrepidity the boldest and most successful that is recorded in the annals of mankind, added a new world, the wealth of which became one BOOK i.] EMPEEOE CHARLES THE FIFTH. 295 considerable source of the power and grandeur of the Spanish monarchs. Don John, the only son of Ferdinand and Isabella, and their eldest daughter, the Queen of Portugal, being cut off, without issue, in the flower of youth, all their hopes centred in Joanna and her posterity. But as her husband, the archduke, was a stranger to the Spaniards, it was thought expedient to invite him into Spain, that by residing among them he might accustom himself to their laws and manners ; and it was expected that the cortes, or assembly of states, whose authority was then so great in Spain that no title to the crown was reckoned valid unless it received their sanction, would acknowledge his right of succession, together with that of the infanta, his wife. Philip and Joanna, passing through France in their way to Spain, were entertained in that kingdom with the utmost magnificence. The archduke did homage to Louis XII. for the earldom of Flanders, and took his seat as a peer of the realm in the parliament of Paris. They were received in Spain with every mark of honour that the parental affection of Ferdinand and Isabella, or the respect of their subjects, could devise ; and their title to the crown was soon after acknowledged by the cortes of both kingdoms. But amidst these outward appearances of satisfaction and joy some secret uneasiness preyed upon the mind of each of these princes. The stately and reserved cere- monial of the Spanish court was so burdensome to Philip, a prince young, gay, affable, fond of society and of pleasure, that he soon began to express a desire of returning to his native country, the manners of which were more suited to his temper. Ferdinand, observing the declining health of his queen, with whose life he knew that his right to the government of Castile must cease, easily foresaw that a prince of Philip's disposition, and who already discovered an extreme impatience to 296 EEIGN OF THE [BOOK i. reign, would never consent to his retaining any degree of authority in that kingdom ; and the prospect of this diminution of his power awakened the jealousy of that ambitious monarch. Isabella beheld with the sentiments natural to a mother the indifference and neglect with which the archduke treated her daughter, who was destitute of those beauties of person as well as those accomplish- ments of mind which fix the affections of a husband. Her understanding, always weak, was often disordered. She doted on Philip with such an excess of childish and indiscreet fondness as excited disgust rather than affec- tion. Her jealousy, for which her husband's behaviour gave her too much cause, was proportioned to her love, and often broke out in the most extravagant actions. Isabella, though sensible of her defects, could not help pitying her condition, which was soon rendered alto- gether deplorable by the archduke's abrupt resolution of setting out in the middle of winter for Flanders and of leaving her in Spain. Isabella entreated him not to abandon his wife to grief and melancholy, which might prove fatal to her, as she was near the time of her delivery. Joanna conjured him to put off his journey for three days only, that she might have the pleasure of celebrating the festival of Christmas in his company. Ferdinand, after representing the imprudence of his leaving Spain before he had time to become acquainted with the genius or to gain the affections of the people who were one day to be his subjects, besought him at least not to pass through France, with which kingdom he was then at open war. Philip, without regarding either the dictates of humanity or the maxims of pru- dence, persisted in his purpose, and on the 22nd of December set out for the Low Countries by the way of France. 1 1 Petri Martyris Anglerii Epistolae, 250, 253. BOOK i.] EMPEROB CHAELES THE FIFTH. From the moment of his departure, Joanna sunk into a deep and sullen melancholy, 2 and while she was in that situation bore Ferdinand, her second son, for whom the power of his brother Charles afterwards procured the kingdoms of Hungary and Bohemia, and to whom he at last transmitted the imperial sceptre. Joanna was the only person in Spain who discovered no joy at the birth of this prince. Insensible to that, as well as to every other pleasure, she was wholly occupied with the thoughts of returning to her husband ; nor did she in any degree recover tranquillity of mind until she arrived at Brussels next year. 3 [1504.] Philip, in passing through France, had an interview with Louis XII., and signed a treaty with him, by which he hoped that all the differences between France and Spain would have been finally terminated. But Ferdinand, whose affairs at that time were extremely prosperous in Italy, where the superior genius of Gron- salvo de Cordova, the great captain, triumphed on every occasion over the arms of France, did not pay the least regard to what his son-in-law had concluded, and carried on hostilities with greater ardour than ever. From this time Philip seems not to have taken any part in the affairs of Spain, waiting in quiet till the death either of Ferdinand or of Isabella should open the way to one of their thrones. The latter of these events was not far distant. The untimely death of her son and eldest daughter had made a deep impression on the mind of Isabella ; and as she could derive but little consolation for the losses which she had sustained either from her daughter Joanna, whose infirmities daily increased, or from her son-in-law, who no longer pre- served even the appearance of a decent respect towards that unhappy princess, her spirits and health began 2 Petri Martyris Anglerii Epia- 3 Mariana, lib. 27, c. 11, 14. tolsse, 255. Fle'chier, Vie de Xime'nes, i. 191. 298 EEIGN OF THE [BOOK i. gradually to decline, and, after languishing some months, she died at Medina del Campo on the 26th of November, 1504. She was no less eminent for virtue than for wisdom ; and, whether we consider her be- haviour as a queen, as a wife, or as a mother, she is justly entitled to the high encomiums bestowed upon her by the Spanish historians. 4 A few weeks before her death, she made her last will, and, being convinced of Joanna's incapacity to assume the reins of government into her own hands, and having no inclination to commit them to Philip, with whose conduct she was extremely dissatisfied, she appointed Ferdinand regent or administrator of the affairs of Castile until her grandson Charles should attain the age of twenty. She bequeathed to Ferdinand likewise one-half of the revenues which should arise from the Indies, together with the grand masterships of the three military orders, dignities which rendered the person who possessed them almost independent, and which Isabella had for that reason annexed to the crown. 5 But before she signed a deed so favourable to Ferdinand she obliged him to swear that he would not, by a second marriage, or by any other means, endeavour to deprive Joanna or her posterity of their right of succession to any of his kingdoms. 6 Immediately upon the queen's death, Ferdinand re- signed the title of king of Castile, and issued orders to proclaim Joanna and Philip the sovereigns of that kingdom. But at the same time he assumed the charac- ter of regent, in consequence of Isabella's testament; and not long after, he prevailed on the cortes of Castile to acknowledge his right to that office. This, however, he did not procure without difficulty, nor without dis- 4 P. Martyr. Ep., 279. raa, Hist g&idr. d'Espagne, torn. 6 P. Martyr, Ep., 277. Mari- viii p. 263. ana, Hist., Hb. 28, c. 11. Ferre- " Mariana, Hist., lib. 28, c. 14. BOOK i.] EMPEROE CHARLES THE FIFTH. 290 covering such symptoms of alienation and disgust among the Castilians as filled him with great uneasiness. The union of Castile and Aragon for almost thirty years had not so entirely extirpated the ancient and hereditary enmity which subsisted between the natives of these kingdoms that the Castilian pride could submit without murmuring to the government of a king of Aragon. Ferdinand's own character, with which the Castilians were well acquainted, was far from rendering his au- thority desirable. Suspicious, discerning, severe, and parsimonious, he was accustomed to observe the most minute actions of his subjects with a jealous attention, and to reward their highest services with little libe- rality ; and they were now deprived of Isabella, whose gentle qualities, and partiality to her Castilian subjects, often tempered his austerity or rendered it tolerable. The maxims of his government were especially odious to the grandees ; for that artful prince, sensible of the dangerous privileges conferred upon them by the feudal institutions, had endeavoured to curb their exorbitant power 7 by extending the royal jurisdiction, by pro- tecting their injured vassals, by increasing the immuni- ties of cities, and by other measures equally prudent. From all these causes a formidable party among the Castilians united against Ferdinand, and, though the persons who composed it had not hitherto taken any public step in opposition to him, he plainly saw that upon the least encouragement from their new king they would proceed to the most violent extremities. There was no less agitation in the Netherlands upon receiving the accounts of Isabella's death and of Fer- dinand's having assumed the government of Castile. Philip was not of a temper tamely to suffer himself to be supplanted by the ambition of his father-in-law. If Joanna's infirmities and the nonage of Charles rendered ' Mariana, Hist., lib. 28, c. 12. 300 REIGN OF THE [BOOK i. them incapable of government, he, as a husband, was the proper guardian of his wife, and, as a father, the natural tutor of his son. Nor was it sufficient to oppose to these just rights, and to the inclination of the people of Castile, the authority of a testament the genuineness of which was perhaps doubtful, and its contents to him appeared certainly to be iniquitous. A keener edge was added to Philip's resentment, and new vigour in- fused into his councils, by the arrival of Don John Manuel. He was Ferdinand's ambassador at the im- perial court, but upon the first notice of Isabella's death repaired to Brussels, flattering himself that under a young and liberal prince he might attain to power and honours which he could never have expected in the service of an old and frugal master. He had early paid court to Philip, during his residence in Spain, with such assiduity as entirely gained his confidence, and, having been trained to business under Ferdinand, could oppose his schemes with equal abilities, and with arts not inferior to those for which that monarch was distinguished. 8 By the advice of Manuel, ambassadors were de- spatched to require Ferdinand to retire into Aragon, and to resign the government of Castile to those per- sons whom Philip should intrust with it until his own arrival in that kingdom. Such of the Castilian nobles as had discovered any dissatisfaction with Ferdinand's administration were encouraged by every method to oppose it. At the same time a treaty was concluded with Louis XII. , by which Philip flattered himself that he had secured the friendship and assistance of that monarch. Meanwhile, Ferdinand employed all the arts of ad- dress and policy in order to retain the power of which he had got possession. By means of Conchillos, an 8 Zurita. Armies de Aragon, torn. vi. p. 12. BOOK i.] EMPEEOE OHAKLES THE FIFTH. 301 Aragonian gentleman, he entered into a private ne- gotiation with Joanna, and prevailed on that weak princess to confirm, by her authority, his right to the regency. But this intrigue did not escape the pene- trating eye of Don John Manuel: Joanna's letter of consent was intercepted, Conchillos was thrown into a dungeon, she herself confined to an apartment in the palace, and all her Spanish domestics secluded from her presence. 9 The mortification which the discovery of this intrigue occasioned to Ferdinand was much increased by his observing the progress which Philip's emissaries made in Castile. Some of the nobles retired to their castles ; others to the towns in which they had influence ; they formed themselves into confederacies and began to assemble their vassals. Ferdinand's court was almost totally deserted, not a, person of distinction but Ximenes, archbishop of Toledo, the duke of' Alva, and the marquis of Denia, remaining there ; while the houses of Philip's ambassadors were daily crowded with noblemen of the highest rank. Exasperated at this universal defection, and morti- fied, perhaps, with seeing all his schemes defeated by a younger politician, Ferdinand resolved, in defiance of the law of nature and of decency, to deprive his daughter and her posterity of the crown of Castile, rather than renounce the regency of that kingdom. His plan for accomplishing this was no less bold than the intention itself was wicked. He demanded in marriage Joanna, the supposed daughter of Henry IV., on the belief of whose illegitimacy Isabella's right to the crown of Castile was founded ; and by reviving the claim of this princess, in opposition to which he him- self had formerly led armies and fought battles, he hoped once more to get possession of the throne of 9 P. Martyr, Ep., 287. Zurita, Anales, vL 14. 302 EEION OP THE [BOOK L that kingdom. But Emanuel, king of Portugal, in whose dominions Joanna resided at that time, having married one of Ferdinand's daughters by Isabella, re- fused his consent to that unnatural match; and the unhappy princess herself, having lost all relish for the objects of ambition by being long immured in a con- vent, discovered no less aversion to it. 10 The resources, however, of Ferdinand's ambition were not exhausted. Upon meeting with a repulse in Portugal, he turned towards France, and sought in marriage Germaine de Foix, a daughter of the viscount of Narbonne ; and of Mary, the sister of Louis XII. The war which that monarch had carried on against Ferdinand in Naples had been so unfortunate that he listened with joy to a proposal which furnished him with an honourable pretence for concluding peace ; and though no prince was ever more remarkable than Ferdi- nand for making all his passions bend to the maxims of interest or become subservient to the purposes of am- bition, yet so vehement was his resentment against his son-in-law that the desire of gratifying it rendered him regardless of every other consideration. In order to be revenged of Philip by detaching Louis from his interest, and in order to gain a chance of excluding him from his hereditary throne of Aragon and the dominions annexed to it, he was ready once more to divide Spain into separate kingdoms, though the union of these was the great glory of his reign and had been the chief object of his ambition ; he consented to restore the Neapolitan nobles of the French faction to their possessions and honours, and submitted to the ridicule of marrying, in an advanced age, a princess of eighteen. 11 10 Sandoval, Hist, of Civil "Wars ll P. Martyr. Ep., 290, 292. in Castile, Lond., 1655, p. 5. Mariana, lib. 28, c. 16, 17. Zurita, Anales de Aragon, vi 213. BOOK i.] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 303 The conclusion of this match, which deprived Philip of his only ally and threatened him with the loss of so many kingdoms, gave him a dreadful alarm, and con- vinced Don John Manuel that there was now a necessity of taking other measures with regard to the affairs of Spain. 12 He accordingly instructed the Flemish am- bassadors in the court of Spain to testify the strong desire which their master had of terminating all differ- ences between him and Ferdinand in an amicable man- ner, and his Avillingness to consent to any conditions that would re-establish the friendship which ought to subsist between a father and a son-in-law. Ferdinand, though he had made and broken more treaties than any prince of any age. was apt to confide so far in the sin- cerity of other men, or to depend so much upon his own address and their weakness, as to be always ex- tremely fond of a negotiation. He listened with eager- ness to the declarations, and soon concluded a treaty at Salamanca, in which it was stipulated that the gov- ernment of Castile should be carried on in the joint names of Joanna, of Ferdinand, and of Philip, and that the revenues of the crown, as well as the right of conferring offices, should be shared between Ferdinand and Philip by an equal division. 13 Nothing, however, was farther from Philip's thoughts than to observe this treaty. His sole intention in pro- posing it was to amuse Ferdinand and to prevent him from taking any measures for obstructing his voyage into Spain. It had that effect. Ferdinand, sagacious as he was, did not for some time suspect his design; and though, when he perceived it, he prevailed on the king of France not only to remonstrate against the archduke's journey, but to threaten hostilities if he should undertake it, though he solicited the duke of 12 P. Martyr. Ep., 293. 19. P. Martyr. Ep., 293, 294 13 Zurita, Anales de Aragon, vi. 304 EEIGN OF THE [BOOK i. Gueldres to attack his son-in-law's dominions in the Low Countries, Philip and his consort nevertheless set sail with a numerous fleet and a good body of land- forces. They were obliged by a violent tempest to take shelter in England, where Henry VII., in com- pliance with Ferdinand's solicitations, detained them upwards of three months : 14 at last they were permitted to depart, and, after a more prosperous voyage, they arrived in safety at Corunna in Galicia, nor durst Fer- dinand attempt, as he once intended, to oppose their landing by force of arms. |~1506.] The Castilian nobles, who had been obliged hitherto to conceal or to dissemble their sentiments, now de- clared openly in favour of Philip. From every corner of the kingdom, persons of the highest rank, with numerous retinues of their vassals, repaired to their new sovereign. The treaty of Salamanca was univer- sally condemned, and all agreed to exclude from the government of Castile a prince who, by consenting to disjoin Aragon and Naples from that crown, discovered so little concern for its true interests. Ferdinand, meanwhile, abandoned by almost all the Castilians, dis- concerted by their revolt, and uncertain whether he should peaceably relinquish his power or take arms in order to maintain it, earnestly solicited an interview with his son-in-law, who, by the advice of Manuel, studiously avoided it. Convinced at last, by seeing the number and zeal of Philip's adherents daily increase, that it was vain to think of resisting such a torrent, Ferdinand consented, by treaty, to resign the regency of Castile into the hands of Philip, to retire into his here- ditary dominions of Aragon, and to rest satisfied with the masterships of the military orders, and that share of the revenue of the Indies which Isabella had be- queathed to him. Though an interview between the 14 Ferreras, Hist., viii. 285. BOOK i.] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 305 princes was no longer necessary, it was agreed to on both sides from motives of decency. Philip repaired to the place appointed with a splendid retinue of Cas- tilian nobles and a considerable body of armed men. Ferdinand appeared without any pomp, attended by a few followers mounted on mules, and unarmed. On that occasion Don John Manuel had the pleasure of displaying before the monarch whom he had deserted the extensive influence which he had acquired over his new master ; while Ferdinand suffered, in presence of his former subjects, the two most cruel mortifica- tions which an artful and ambitious prince can feel, being at once overreached in conduct and stripped of power. 18 Not long after, he retired into Aragon ; and, hoping that some favourable accident would soon open the way to his return into Castile, he took care to protest, though with great secrecy, that the treaty concluded with his son-in-law, being extorted by force, ought to be deemed void of all obligation. 16 Philip took possession of his new authority with a youthful joy. The unhappy Joanna, from whom he derived it, remained, during all these contests, under the dominion of a deep melancholy; she was seldom allowed to appear in public ; her father, though he had often desired it, was refused access to her ; and Philip's chief object was to prevail on the cortes to declare her incapable of government, that an undivided power might bo lodged in his hands until his son should attain to full age. But such was the partial attachment of the Castilians to their native princess that, though Manuel had the address to gain some members of the cortes assembled at Valladolid, and others were willing 1S Zurita, Anales de Aragon, vi 16 Zurita, Anales de Aragon, vi 64. M ariana, lib. 28, c. 19, 20. 68. Ferreras, Hist. viii. 290. P. Mart -r. Ep., 304, 305, etc. VOL. I. X 306 REIGN OF THE [BOOK i. to gratify their new sovereign in his first request, the great body of the representatives refused their consent to a declaration which they thought so injurious to the blood of their monarchs. 17 They were unanimous, however, in acknowledging Joanna and Philip queen and king of Castile, and their son Charles prince of Asturias. This was almost the only memorable event during Philip's administration. A fever put an end to his life in the twenty-eighth year of his age, when he had not enjoyed the regal dignity, which he had been so eager to obtain, full three months. 18 The whole royal authority in Castile ought, of course, to have devolved upon Joanna. But the shock occa- sioned by a disaster so unexpected as the death of her husband completed the disorder of her understanding and her incapacity for government. During all the time of Philip's sickness, no entreaty could prevail on her, though in the sixth month of her pregnancy, to leave him for a moment. When he expired, however, she did not shed one tear or utter a single groan. Her grief was silent and settled. She continued to watch the dead body with the same tenderness and attention as if it had been alive, 19 and, though at last she per- mitted it to be buried, she soon removed it from the tomb to her own apartment. There it was laid upon a bed of state, in a splendid dress; and, having heard from some monk a legendary tale of a king who revived after he had been dead fourteen years, she kept her eyes almost constantly fixed on the body, waiting for the happy moment of its return to life. Nor was this capricious affection for her dead husband less tinctured with jealousy than that which she had borne to him when alive. She did not permit any of her female 17 Zurita, Anales de Aragon, vi 18 Mariana, lib. 28, c. 23. [1506 ] 76 19 P. Martyr, Ep., 316. BOOK i.] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 307 attendants to approach the bed on which his corpse was laid; she would not suffer any woman who did not belong to her family to enter the apartment ; and, rather than grant that privilege to a midwife, though a very aged one had been chosen on purpose, she bore the princess Catharine without any other assistance than that of her own domestics. 20 A woman in such a state of mind was little capable of governing a great kingdom ; and Joanna, who made it her sole employment to bewail the loss and to pray for the soul of her husband, would have thought her attention to public affairs an impious neglect of those duties which she owed to him. But though she de- clined assuming the administration herself, yet, by a strange caprice of jealousy, she refused to commit it to any other person; and no entreaty of her subjects could persuade her to name a regent, or even to sign such papers as were necessary for the execution of justice and the security of the kingdom. The death of Philip threw the Castilians into the greatest perplexity. It was necessary to appoint a regent, both on account of Joanna's frenzy and the infancy of her son; and as there was not among the nobles any person so eminently distinguished, either by superiority in rank or abilities, as to be called by the public voice to that high office, all naturally turned their eyes either towards Ferdinand or towards the emperor Maximilian. The former claimed that dignity as administrator for his daughter, and by virtue of the testament of Isabella; the latter thought himself the legal guardian of his grandson, whom, on account of his mother's infirmities, he already considered as king of Castile. Such of the nobility as had lately been most active in compelling Ferdinand to resign the government of the kingdom trembled at the thoughts * Mariana, Hist., lib. 29, c. 3, 5. P. Martyr, Ep., 318, 324. 328, 332. X 2 308 REIGN OF THE [BOOK i. of his being restored so soon to his former dignity. They dreaded the return of a monarch not apt to for- give, and who to those defects with which they were already acquainted added that resentment which the remembrance of their behaviour, and reflection upon his own disgrace, must naturally have excited. Though none of these objections lay against Maximilian, he was a stranger to the laws and manners of Castile ; he had not either troops or money to support his preten- sions, nor could his claim be admitted without a public declaration of Joanna's incapacity for government, an indignity to which, notwithstanding the notoriety of her distemper, the delicacy of the Castilians could not bear the thoughts of subjecting her. Don John Manuel, however, and a few of the nobles who considered themselves most obnoxious to Ferdi- nand's displeasure, declared for Maximilian, and offered to support his claim with all their interest. Maximilian, always enterprising and decisive in council, though feeble and dilatory in execution, eagerly embraced the offer. But a series of ineffectual negotiations was the only consequence of this transaction. The emperor, as usual, asserted his right in a high strain, promised a great deal, and performed nothing. 21 A few days before the death of Philip, Ferdinand had set out for Naples, that by his own presence he might put an end with greater decency to the vice- royalty of the Great Captain, whose important services and cautious conduct did not screen him from the sus- picions of his jealous master. Though an account of his son-in-law's death reached h' n at Porto-fino, in the territories of Genoa, he was so solicitous to discover the secret intrigues which he supposed the Great Cap- tain to have been carrying on, and to establish his own authority on a firm foundation in the Neapolitan do- :1 Mariana, lib. 29, c. 7. Zurita, Anales de Aragon, vi. 93. BOOK i.] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 309 minions by removing him from the supreme command there, that rather than discontinue his voyage he chose to leave Castile in a state of anarchy, and even to risk by this delay his obtaining possession of the govern- ment of that kingdom. 22 Nothing but the great abilities and prudten conduct of his adherents could have prevented the bad effects of this absence. At the head of these was Ximenes, archbishop of Toledo, who, though he had been raised to that dignity by Isabella contrary to the inclination of Ferdinand, and though he could have no expectation of enjoying much power under the administration of a master little disposed to distinguish him by extraordi- nary marks of attention, was nevertheless so disinter- ested as to prefer the welfare of his country before his own grandeur, and to declare that Castile could never be so happily governed as by a prince whom long experience had rendered thoroughly acquainted with its true interest. The zeal of Ximenes to bring over his countrymen to this opinion induced him to lay aside somewhat of his usual austerity and haughtiness. He condescended on this occasion to court the dis- affected nobles, and employed address, as well as argu- ments, to persuade them. Ferdinand seconded his endeavours with great art ; and by concessions to some of the grandees, by promises to others, and by letters full of complaisance to all, he gained many of his most violent opponents. 23 Though many cabals were formed, and some commotions were excited, yet when Ferdi- nand, after having settled the affairs of Naples, arrived in Castile, he entered upon the administration without opposition. The prudence with which he exercised his authority in that kingdom equalled the good fortune by which he had recovered it. By a moderate but steady 22 Zurita, Anales de Aragon, vi. * Ibid., vl 87, 94, 109. 85. 310 REIGN OF THE [BOOK I. administration, free from partiality and from resentment^ he entirely reconciled the Castilians to his person, and secured to them, during the remainder of his life, as much domestic tranquillity as was consistent with the genius of the feudal government, which still subsisted among them in full vigour. 24 Nor was the preservation of tranquillity in his heredi- tary kingdoms the only obligation which the Archduke Charles owed to the wise regency of his grandfather. It was his good fortune, during that period, to have very important additions made to the dominions over which he was to reign. On the coast of Barbary, Oran, and other conquests of no small value, were annexed to the crown of Castile by Cardinal Ximenes, who, with a spirit very uncommon in a monk, led in person a nume- rous army against the Moors of that country, and, with a generosity and magnificence still more singular, defrayed the whole expense of the expedition out of his own revenues. 25 In Europe, Ferdinand, under pretences no less frivolous than unjust, as well as by artifices the most shameful and treacherous, expelled John d'Albret, the lawful sovereign, from the throne of Navarre, and, seizing that kingdom, extended the limits of the Spanish monarchy from the Pyrenees on the one hand to the frontiers of Portugal on the other. 26 It was not, however, the desire of aggrandizing the archduke which influenced Ferdinand in this or in any other of his actions. He was more apt to consider that young prince as a rival who might one day wrest out of his hands the government of Castile, than as a grandson for whose interest he was entrusted with the adminis- tration. This jealousy soon begot aversion, and even hatred, the symptoms of which he was at no pains to conceal. Hence proceeded his immoderate joy when 24 Mariana, lib. 29, c. 10. 26 Ibid., lib. 30, c. 11, 12, 18, * Ibid., lib. 29, c. 18. 24. BOOK i.] EMPEROE CHARLES THE FIFTH. 311 his young queen was delivered of a son, whose life would have deprived Charles of the crowns of Aragon, Naples, Sicily, and Sardinia ; and upon the untimely death of that prince he discovered, for the same reason, an excessive solicitude to have other children. This impatience hastened, in all probability, the accession of Charles to the crown of Spain. Ferdinand, in order to procure a blessing of which, from his advanced age and the intemperance of his youth, he could have little pro- spect, had recourse to his physicians, and by their prescrip- tion took one of those potions which are supposed to add vigour to the constitution, though they more frequently prove fatal to it. This was its effect on a frame so feeble and exhausted as that of Ferdinand ; for though he survived a violent disorder which it at first occa- sioned, it brought on such an habitual langour and dejection of mind as rendered him averse from any serious attention to public affairs, and fond of frivolous amusements, on which he had not hitherto bestowed much time. 27 Though he now despaired of having any son of his own, his jealousy of the archduke did not abate, nor could he help viewing him with that aversion which princes often bear to their successors. In order to gratify this unnatural passion, he made a will ap- pointing Prince Ferdinand, who, having been born and educated in Spain, was much beloved by the Spaniards, to be regent of all his kingdoms until the arrival of the archduke his brother ; and by the same deed he settled upon him the grand-mastership of the three military orders. The former of these grants might have put it in the power of the young prince to have disputed the throne with his brother ; the latter would, in any event, have rendered him almost independent of him. Ferdinand retained to the last that jealous love of 27 Zurita, Anales de Aragon, vi. gensola, Anales de Aragon, lib. L 347. P. Martyr. Ep., 531. Ar- p. 4. 312 EEIGN OF THE [BOOK I. power which was so remarkable through his whole life. Unwilling, even at the approach of death, to admit a thought of relinquishing any portion of his authority, he removed continually from place to place, in order to fly from his distemper, or to forget it. Though his strength declined every day, none of his attendants durst mention his condition; nor would he admit his father-confessor, who thought such silence criminal and unchristian, into his presence. At last the danger be- came so imminent that it could be no longer concealed. Ferdinand received the intimation with a decent forti- tude ; and, touched, perhaps, with compunction at the injustice which he had done his grandson, or influenced by the honest remonstrances of Carvajal, Zapara, and Vargas, his most ancient and faithful councillors, who represented to him that by investing Prince Ferdinand with the regency he would infallibly entail a civil war on the two brothers, and by bestowing on him the grand-mastership of the military orders would strip the crown of its noblest ornament and chief strength, he consented to alter his will with respect to both these particulars. By a new deed he left Charles the sole heir of all his dominions, and allotted to Prince Ferdi- nand, instead of that throne of which he thought himself almost secure, an inconsiderable establishment of fifty thousand ducats a year. 28 He died a few hours after signing this will, on the 23rd day of January, 1516. Charles, to whom such a noble inheritance descended by his death, was near the full age of sixteen. He had hitherto resided in the Low Countries, his paternal dominions. Margaret of Austria, his aunt, and Mar- garet of York, the sister of Edward IV. of England, ' 8 Mariana, Hist, lib. 30, c. ult. Argensola, Analea de Aragon, lib. Zurita, Anales de Aragon, vi. L p. 11. 401. P. Martyr. Ep., 565, 566. BOOK I. EMPEROR CHARLES TOE FIFTH. and widow of Charles the Bold, two princesses of great virtue and abilities, had the care of forming his early youth. Upon the death of his father the Flemings committed the government of the Low Countries to his grandfather, the Emperor Maximilian, with the name rather than the authority of regent. 29 Maxi- milian made choice of William de Croy, lord of Chievres, to superintend the education of the young prince his grandson. 30 That nobleman possessed in an eminent 29 Pontius Heuterus, Rerum Aus- triacarum Lib. XV., Lov., 1649, lib. viL c. 2, p. 155. 3 The French historians, upon the authority of M. de Bellay, Me'moires, p. 11, have unanimous- ly asserted that, Philip by his last will having appointed the king of France to have the direction of his son's education, Louis XII., with a disinterestedness suitable to the confidence reposed in him, named Chievres for that office. Even the President He'nault has adopted this opinion. (Abrege' Chron., A.D. 1507.) Varillas, in his usual man- ner, pretends to have seen Philip's testament. (Pract. de 1'Educa- tion des Princes, p. 16.) But the Spanish, German, and Flemish his- torians concur in contradicting this assertion of the French authors. It appears from Heuterus, a con- temporary Flemish historian of great authority, that Louis XII., by con- senting to the marriage of Ger- maine de Foix with Ferdinand, had lost much of that confidence which Philip once placed in him ; that his disgust was increased by the French king's giving in marriage to the count of Angoule'me his eldest daughter, whom he had formerly betrothed to Charles (Heuter., Rer. Austr. lib. v. p. 151) ; that the French, a short time before Philip's death, had violated the peace which subsisted between them and the Flemings, and Philip had com- plained of this injury and was ready to resent it. (Heuter., ibid.) All these circumstances render it improbable that Philip, who made his will a few days before he died (Heuter., p. 152), should commit the education of his son to Louis XII. In confirmation of these plausible conjectures positive testi- mony can be produced. It appears from Heuterus that Philip, when he set out for Spain, had intrusted Chievres both with the care of hia son's education and with the go- vernment of his dominions in the Low Countries (Heuter., lib. vii. p. 153); that an attempt was made, soon after Philip's death, to have the emperor Maximilian appointed regent during the minority of hia grandson, but, this being opposed, Chievres seems to have continued to discharge both the offices which Philip had committed to him (Heu- ter., ibid., 153, 155) ; that in the beginning of the year 1508 the Flemings invited Maximilian to ac- cept of the regency, to which he consented, and appointed his daugh- ter Margaret, together with a coun- cil of Flemings, to exercise the supreme authority when he him- self should at any time be absent. 31 4 REIGN OF THE [BOOK i. degree tlie talents which fitted him for such an im- portant office, and discharged the duties of it with great fidelity. Under Chievres, Adrian of Utrecht acted as preceptor. This preferment, which opened his way to the highest dignities an ecclesiastic can attain, he owed not to his birth, for that was extremely mean, nor to his interest, for he was a stranger to the arts of a court, but to the opinion which his country- men entertained of his learning. He was indeed no inconsiderable proficient in those frivolous sciences which during several centuries assumed the name of philosophy, and had published a commentary, which was highly esteemed, upon The Book of Sentences, a famous treatise of Petrus Lombardus, considered at that time as the standard system of metaphysical theology. But, whatever admiration these procured him in an illiterate age, it was soon found that a man accustomed to the retirement of a college, unacquainted with the world, and without any tincture of taste or elegance, was by no means qualified for rendering science agreeable to a young prince. Charles, accord- ingly, discovered an early aversion to learning, and an excessive fondness for those violent and martial exer- cises to excel in which was the chief pride, and almost the only study, of persons of rank in that age. Chievres encouraged this taste, either from a desire of gaining his pupil by indulgence, or from too slight an opinion of the advantages of literary accomplish- ments. 31 He instructed him, however, with great care He likewise named Chievres as Barlandus, Chronic. Brabant., ibid., governor, and Adrian of Utrecht p. 25 ; and by Haraeus, AnnaL as preceptor to his son. (Heuter., Brab., vol. ii. p. 520, etc. ibid., 155, 157.) What Heuterus 31 Jovii Vita Adriani, p. 91. relates with respect to this matter Struvii Corpus Hist. Germ., ii. is confirmed by Moringus, in Vita 967. P. Heuter., Rer. Austr., lib. Adriani apud Analecta Casp. Bur- vii. c. 3, p. 157. muimi de Adriano, cap. 10 ; by BOOK i.] EMPEKOB CHARLES THE FIFTH. 315 in the arts of government ; he made him study the history not only of his own kingdoms, but of those with which they were connected ; he accustomed him, from the time of his assuming the government of Flanders, in the year 1515, to attend to business; he persuaded him to peruse all papers relating to public affairs, to be present at the deliberations of his privy- councillors, and to propose to them himself those matters concerning which he required their opinion. 32 From such an education Charles contracted habits of gravity and recollection which scarcely suited his time of life. The first openings of his genius did not indi- cate that superiority which its maturer age displayed. 33 He did not discover in his youth the impetuosity of spirit which commonly ushers in an active and enter- prising manhood. Nor did his early obsequiousness to Chievres and his other favourites promise that capacious and decisive judgment which afterwards directed the affairs of one-half of Europe. But his subjects, dazzled with the external accomplishments of a graceful figure and manly address, and viewing his character with that partiality which is always shown to princes during their youth, entertained sanguine hopes of his adding lustre to those crowns which descended to him by the death of Ferdinand. The kingdoms of Spain, as is evident from the view which I have given of their political constitution, were at that time in a situation which required an admi- nistration no less vigorous than prudent. The feudal institutions, which had been introduced into all its different provinces by the Goths, the Suevi, and the Vandals, subsisted in great force. The nobles, who were powerful and warlike, had long possessed all the exorbi- tant privileges which these institutions vested in their 32 Mdmoires de Bellay, 8vo, Par., c 1, p. 184. 1573, p. 11. P. Heuter., lib. viii. 33 P. Martyr. Ep., 569, 655. 316 HEIGN OF THE [BOOK t. order. The cities in Spain were more numerous and more considerable than the genius of feudal government, naturally unfavourable to commerce and to regular police, seemed to admit. The personal rights and poli- tical influence which the inhabitants of these cities had acquired were extensive. The royal prerogative, cir- cumscribed by the privileges of the nobility and by the pretensions of the people, was confined within very narrow limits. Under such a form of government, the principles of discord were many, the bond of union was extremely feeble, and Spain felt not only all the inconveniences occasioned by the defects in the feudal system, but was exposed to disorders arising from the peculiarities in its own constitution. During the long administration of Ferdinand, no internal commotion, it is true, had arisen in Spain. His superior abilities had enabled him to restrain the turbulence of the nobles and to moderate the jealousy of the commons. By the wisdom of his domestic government, by the sagacity with which he conducted his foreign operations, and by the high opinion that his subjects entertained of both, he had preserved among them a degree of tranquillity greater than was natural to a constitution in which the seeds of discord and disorder were so copiously mingled. But by the death of Ferdinand these restraints were at once Avith- drawn ; and faction and discontent, from being long repressed, were ready to break out with fiercer animosity. In order to prevent these evils, Ferdinand had in his last will taken a most prudent precaution, by appoint- ing Cardinal Ximenes, Archbishop of Toledo, to be sole regent of Castile until the arrival of his grandson in Spain. The singular character of this man, and the extraordinary qualities which marked him out for that office at such a juncture, merit a particular description. BOOK i.] EMPEROR CUAELES THE FIFTH. 317 He was descended of an honourable, not of a wealthy, family ; and, the circumstances of his parents, as well as his own inclinations, having determined him to f. liter into the Church, he early obtained benefices of great value, and which placed him in the way of the highest preferment. All these, however, he renounced at once, and, after undergoing a very severe novitiate, assumed the habit of St. Francis in a monastery of Observantine friars, one of the most rigid orders in the Eomish Church. There he soon became eminent for his un- common austerity of manners, and for those excesses of superstitious devotion which are the proper charac- teristics of the monastic life. But, notwithstanding these extravagances, to which weak and enthusiastic minds alone are usually prone, his understanding, natu- rally penetrating and decisive, retained its full vigour, and acquired him such great authority in his own order as raised him to be their provincial. His reputation for sanctity soon procured him the office of father-con- fessor to Queen Isabella, which he accepted with the utmost reluctance. He preserved in a court the same austerity of manners which had distinguished him in the cloister. He continued to make all his journeys on foot ; he subsisted only upon alms ; his acts of mor- tification were as severe as ever, and his penances as rigorous. Isabella, pleased with her choice, conferred on him, not long after, the archbishopric of Toledo, which, next to the papacy, is the richest dignity in the Church of Rome. This honour he declined with the firmness which nothing but the authoritative injunction of the pope was able to overcome. Nor did this height of promotion change his manners. Though obliged to display in public that magnificence which became his station, he himself retained his monastic severity. Under his pontifical robes he constantly wore the coarse frock of St. Francis, the rents in which he used to patch 318 EEIGN OF THE [BOOK i. with his own hands. He at no time used linen, but was commonly clad in hair-cloth. He slept always in his habit, most frequently on the ground, or on boards, rarely in a bed. He did not taste any of the delicacies which appeared at his table, but satisfied himself with that simple diet which the rule of his order prescribed. 34 Notwithstanding these peculiarities, so opposite to the manners of the world, he possessed a thorough know- ledge of its affairs ; and no sooner was he called by his station, and by the high opinion which Ferdinand and Isabella entertained of him, to take a principal share in the administration, than he displayed talents for business which rendered the fame of his wisdom equal to that of his sanctity. His political conduct, remarkable for the boldness and originality of all his plans, flowed from his real character, and partook both of its virtues and its defects. His extensive genius suggested to him schemes vast and magnificent. Conscious of the integrity of his intentions, he pursued these with unre- mitting and undaunted firmness. Accustomed from his early youth to mortify his own passions, he showed little indulgence towards those of other men. Taught by his system of religion to check even his most inno- cent desires, he was the enemy of everything to which he could affix the name of elegance or pleasure. Though free from any suspicion of cruelty, he discovered in all his commerce with the world a severe inflexibility of mind, and austerity of character, peculiar to the monastic profession, and which can hardly be conceived in a country where that is unknown. Such was the man to whom Ferdinand committed the regency of Castile ; and though Ximenes was then near fourscore, and perfectly acquainted with the labour and difficulty of the office, his natural intrepidity of 34 Histoire de 1'Aclministration Baudier, 4to, 1635, p 13. du Cardinal Ximdnes, par Mich. BOOK i.] EMPEEOE CHAELES THE FIFTH. 319 mind, and zeal for the public good, prompted him to accept of it without hesitation. Adrian of Utrecht, who had been sent into Spain a few months before the death of Ferdinand, produced full powers from the archduke to assume the name and authority of regent upon the demise of his grandfather ; but such was the aversion of the Spaniards to the government of a stranger, and so unequal the abilities of the two com- petitors, that Adrian's claim would at once have been rejected if Ximenes himself, from complaisance to his new master, had not consented to acknowledge him as regent and to carry on the government in conjunction with him. By this, however, Adrian acquired a dignity merely nominal. Ximenes, though he treated him with great decency, and even respect, retained the whole power in his own hands. 36 The cardinal's first care was to observe the motions of the infant Don Ferdinand, who, having been flattered with so near a prospect of supreme power, bore the dis- appointment of his hopes with greater impatience than a prince at a period of life so early could have been supposed to feel. Ximenes, under pretence of pro- viding more effectually for his safety, removed him from Gruadalupe, the place in which he had been educated, to Madrid, where he fixed the residence of the court. There he was under the cardinal's own eye, and his conduct, with that of his domestics, was watched with the utmost attention. 36 The first intelligence he received from the Low Countries gave greater disquiet to the cardinal, and convinced him how difficult a task it would be to conduct the affairs of an inexperienced prince under the influence of councillors unacquainted with the laws " Gometius de Eeb. gest Xime- i. c. 2. Baudier, Hist, de Ximrf- nil, p. 150, fol., Compl, 1569. nfes, p. 118. 3i; Miiiiaiiau Contiu. Murianse, lib. 320 BEIGN OP THE [BOOK i. and manners of Spain. No sooner did the account of Ferdinand's death reach Brussels, than Charles, by the advice of his Flemish ministers, resolved to assume the title of king. By the laws of Spain, the sole right of the crowns both of Castile and of Aragon belonged to Joanna ; and, though her infirmities disqualified her from governing, this incapacity had not been declared by any public act of the cortes in either kingdom ; so that the Spaniards considered this resolution not only as a direct violation of their privileges, but as an unnatural usurpation in a son on the prerogatives of a mother, towards whom, in her present unhappy situation, he manifested a less delicate regard than her subjects had always expressed. 37 The Flemish court, however, having prevailed both on the pope and on the emperor to address letters to Charles as king of Castile, the former of whom it was pre- tended had a right as head of the Church, and the latter as head of the empire, to confer this title, instructions were sent to Ximenes to prevail on the Spaniards to acknowledge it. Ximenes, though he had earnestly remonstrated against the measure, as no less unpopular than unnecessary, resolved to exert all his authority and credit in carrying it into execution, and immediately assembled such of the nobles as were then at court. What Charles required was laid before them ; and when, instead of complying with his demands, they began to murmur against such an unprecedented encroachment on their privileges, and to talk high of the rights of Joanna and their oath of allegiance to her, Ximenes hastily interposed, and, with that firm and decisive tone which was natural to him, told them that they were not called now to deliberate, but to obey ; that their sovereign did not apply to them for advice, but expected submission ; and " this day," 37 P, Martyr. Ep., 563. UOOK i.] EMPEKOR OHAELES THE FIFTH. 321 added he, " Charles shall be proclaimed king of Castile in Madrid; and the rest of the cities, I doubt not, will follow its example." On the spot he gave orders for that purpose; 38 and, notwithstanding the novelty of the practice, and the secret discontents of many persons of distinction, Charles's title was universally recognized. In Aragon, where the privileges of the subject were more extensive, and the abilities as well as authority of the archbishop of Saragossa, whom Ferdinand had appointed regent, were far inferior to those of Ximenes, the same obsequiousness to the will of Charles did not appear, nor was he acknowledged there under any other character but that of prince, until his arrival in Spain. 89 Ximenes, though possessed only of delegated power, which, from his advanced age, he could not expect to enjoy long, assumed, together with the character of regent, all the ideas natural to a monarch, and adopted schemes for extending the regal authority, which he pursued with as much intrepidity and ardour as if he himself had been to reap the advantages resulting from their success. The exorbitant privileges of the Cas- tilian nobles circumscribed the prerogative of the prince within very narrow limits. These privileges the cardinal considered as so many unjust extortions from the crown, and determined to abridge them. Dan- gerous as the attempt was, there were circumstances in his situation which promised him greater success than any king of Castile could have expected. His strict and prudent economy of his archiepiscopal revenues furnished him with more ready money than the crown could at any time command ; the sanctity of his manners, his charity and munificence, rendered him the idol of the people ; and the nobles themselves, 38 Gometius, p. 152, etc. Bait- " P. Martyr. Ep., 572. dier, Hist, de Ximenes, p. 121. VOL. I. * 322 REIGN OF THE [BOOK *. not suspecting any danger from him, did not observe his motions with the same jealous attention as they would have watched those of one of their monarchs. Immediately upon his accession to the regency, several of the nobles, fancying that the reins of govern- ment would, of consequence, be somewhat relaxed, began to assemble their vassals, and to prosecute, by force of arms, private quarrels and pretensions which the authority of Ferdinand had obliged them to dissemble or to relinquish. But Ximenes, who had taken into pay a good body of troops, opposed and defeated all their designs with unexpected vigour and facility ; and, though he did not treat the authors of these disorders with any cruelty, he forced them to acts of submission extremely mortifying to the haughty spirit of Castilian grandees. But while the cardinal's attacks were confined to individuals, and every act of rigour was justified by the appearance of necessity, founded on the forms of justice and tempered with a mixture of lenity, there was scarcely room for jealousy or complaint. It was not so with his next measure, which, by striking at a privilege essential to the nobility, gave a general alarm to the whole order. By the feudal constitution, the military power was lodged in the hands of the nobles, and men of an inferior condition were called into the field only as their vassals and to follow their banners, A king with scanty revenues and a limited prerogative depended on these potent barons in all his operations. It was with their forces he attacked his enemies, and with them he defended his kingdom. While at the head of troops attached warmly to their own im- mediate lords and accustomed to obey no other com- mands, his authority was precarious and his efforts feeble. From this state Ximenes resolved to deliver the crown ; and as mercenary standing armies were unknown under the feudal government, and would BOOK i.] EMPEEOR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 323 have been odious to a martial and generous people, he issued a proclamation commanding every city in Castile to enrol a certain number of its burgesses, in order that they might be trained to the use of arms on Sundays and holidays; he engaged to provide officers to command them at the public expense, and, as an encouragement to the private men, promised them an exemption from all taxes and impositions. The fre- quent incursions of the Moors from Africa, and the necessity of having some force always ready to oppose them, furnished a plausible pretence for this innova- tion. The object really in view was to secure the king a body of troops independent of his barons and which might serve to counterbalance their power. 40 The nobles were not slow in perceiving what was his inten- tion, and saw how effectually the scheme which he had adopted would accomplish his end; but as a measure which had the pious appearance of resisting the pro- gress of the infidels was extremely popular, and as any opposition to it arising from their order alone would have been imputed wholly to interested motives, they endeavoured to excite the cities themselves to refuse obedience and to inveigh against the proclamation as inconsistent with their charters and privileges. In consequence of their instigation, Burgos, Valladolid, and several other cities rose in open mutiny. Some of the grandees declared themselves their protectors. Violent remonstrances were presented to the king. His Flemish councillors were alarmed. Ximenes alone continued firm and undaunted ; and, partly by terror, partly by entreaty, by force in some instances, and by forbearance in others, he prevailed on all the refractory cities to comply. 41 During his administration he con- 40 Minianae Continuatio Marianae, 41 P. Martyr. Ep., 556, etc. foL, Hag., 1733, p. 3. Gometius, p. J 60, etc. T * 324 REIGN OP THE [BOOK i. tinued to execute his plan with vigour ; but soon after his death it was entirely dropped. His success in this scheme for reducing the exorbi- tant power of the nobility encouraged him to attempt a diminution of their possessions, which were no less exorbitant. During the contests and disorders insepa- rable from the feudal government, the nobles, ever attentive to their own interest, and taking advantage of the weakness or distress of their monarchs, had seized some parts of the royal demesnes, obtained grants of others, and, having gradually wrested almost the whole out of the hands of the prince, had annexed them to their own estates. The titles by which most of the grandees held these lands were extremely de- fective : it was from some successful usurpation which the crown had been too feeble to dispute, that many derived their only claim to possession. An inquiry carried back to the origin of these encroachments, which were almost coeval with the feudal system, was impracticable ; and, as it would have stripped every nobleman in Spain of great part of his lands, it must have excited a general revolt. Such a step was too bold even for the enterprising spirit of Ximenes. He confined himself to the reign of Ferdinand, and, beginning with the pensions granted during that time, refused to make any farther payment, because all right to them expired with his life. He then called to account such as had acquired crown lands under the administration of that monarch, and at once resumed whatever he had alienated. The effects of these revocations extended to many persons of high rank ; for though Ferdinand was a prince of little generosity, yet he and Isabella having been raised to the throne of Castile by a powerful fac- tion of the nobles, they were obliged to reward the zeal of their adherents with great liberality, and the royal demesnes were their only fund for that purpose. The BOOK i.] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 325 addition made to the revenue of the crown by these revocations, together with his own frugal economy, enabled Ximenes not only to discharge all the debts which Ferdinand had left, and to remit considerable sums to Flanders, but to pay the officers of his new militia, and to establish magazines not only more numerous, but better furnished with artillery, arms, and warlike stores, than Spain had ever possessed in any former age. 42 The prudent and disinterested ap- plication of these sums was a full apology to the people for the rigour with which they were exacted. The nobles, alarmed at these repeated attacks, began to think of precautions for the safety of their order. Many cabals were formed, loud complaints were uttered, and desperate resolutions taken ; but before they pro- ceeded to extremities they appointed some of their number to examine the powers in consequence of which the cardinal exercised acts of such high authority. The admiral of Castile, the Duke de Infantado, and the Conde de Benevento, grandees of the first rank, were intrusted with this commission. Ximenes received them with cold civility, and, in answer to their demand, produced the testament of Ferdinand, by which he was appointed regent, together with the ratification of that deed by Charles. To both these they objected ; and he endeavoured to establish their validity. As the con- versation grew warm, he led them insensibly towards a balcony, from which they had a view of a large body of troops under arms, and of a formidable train of artillery. " Behold," says he, pointing to these, and raising his voice, " the powers which I have received from his Catholic majesty. With these I govern Castile ; and with these I will govern it until the king, youi oaaster and mine, takes possession of his king- J2 Flechier, Vie de Ximtfnfc, ii 600 326 fcEIGN OF THE [BOOK t dom." 43 A declaration so bold and haughty silenced them and astonished their associates. To take arms against a man aware of his danger and prepared for his defence was what despair alone would dictate. All thoughts of a general confederacy against the cardinal's adminis- tration were laid aside ; and, except for some slight com- motions excited by the private resentment of par- ticular noblemen, the tranquillity of Castile suffered no interruption. It was not only from the opposition of the Spanish nobility that obstacles arose to the execution of the cardinal's schemes ; he had a constant struggle to maintain with the Flemish ministers, who, presuming upon their favour with the young king, aimed at direct- ing the affairs of Spain, as well as those of their own country. Jealous of the great abilities and independent spirit of Ximenes, they considered him rather as a rival who might circumscribe their power than as a minister who by his prudence and vigour was adding to the grandeur and authority of their master. Every com- plaint against his administration was listened to with pleasure by the courtiers in the Low Countries. Un- necessary obstructions were thrown by their means in the way of all his measures ; and though they could not either with decency or safety deprive him of the office of regent, they endeavoured to lessen his authority by dividing it. They soon discovered that Adrian of Utrecht, already joined with him in office, had neither genius nor spirit sufficient to give the least check to his proceedings ; and therefore Charles, by their advice, added to the commission of regency La Chau, a Flemish gentleman, and afterwards Amerstorf, a nobleman of Holland, the former distinguished for his address, the latter for his firmness. Ximenes, though no stranger to the malevolent intention of the Flemish courtiers, received 43 Fl&hier, ii. 551. Ferreras, Hist, viii 433. OOK i.j EMPEROK CHAELES THE FIFTH. 327 these new associates with, all the external marks of dis- tinction due to the office with which they were invested; but when they came to enter upon business he abated nothing of that air of superiority with which he had treated Adrian, and still retained the sole direction of affairs. The Spaniards, more averse, perhaps, than any other people to the government of strangers, approved of all his efforts to preserve his own authority. Even the nobles, influenced by this national passion and forgetting their jealousies and discontents, chose rather to see the supreme power in the hands of one of their countrymen whom they feared than in those of foreigners, whom they hated. Ximenes, though engaged in such great schemes of domestic policy and embarrassed by the artifices and intrigues of the Flemish ministers, had the burden of two foreign wars to support. The one was in Navarre, which was invaded by its unfortunate monarch, John d'Albret. The death of Ferdinand, the absence of Charles, the discord and disaffection which reigned among the Spanish nobles, seemed to present him with a favourable opportunity of recovering his dominions. The cardinal's vigilance, however, defeated a measure so well concerted. As he foresaw the danger to which that kingdom might be exposed, one of his first acts of administration was to order thither a considerable body of troops. While the king was employed with one part of his army in the siege of St. Jean Pied en Port, Villalva, an officer of great experience and courage, attacked the other by surprise and cut it to pieces. The king in- stantly retreated with precipitation, and an end was put to the war. 44 But as Navarre was filled at that time with towns and castles slightly fortified and weakly garrisoned, which, being unable to resist an enemy, served only to furnish him with places of retreat, 44 P. Martyr. Ep., 570. 328 EEIQN OP THE [BOOK i, Ximenes, always bold and decisive in his measures, ordered every one of these to be dismantled, except Pampeluna, the fortifications of which he proposed to render very strong. To this uncommon precaution Spain owes the possession of Navarre. The French, since that period, have often entered and have as often overrun the open country. While they were exposed to all the inconveniences attending an invading army, the Spaniards have easily drawn troops from the neigh- bouring provinces to oppose them ; and the French, having no place of any strength to which they could retire, have been obliged repeatedly to abandon their conquest with as much rapidity as they gained it. The other war, which he carried on in Africa against the famous adventurer Horuc Barbarossa, who from a private corsair raised himself, by his singular valour and address, to be king of Algiers and Tunis, was far from being equally successful. The ill conduct of the Spanish general and the rash valour of his troops presented Barbarossa with an easy victory. Many perished in the battle, more in the retreat, and the remainder returned into Spain covered with infamy. The magnanimity, however, with which the cardinal bore this disgrace, the only one he experienced during his administration, added new lustre to his character. 45 Great composure of temper under a disappointment was not expected from a man so remarkable for the eagerness and impa- tience with which he urged on the execution of all his schemes. This disaster was soon forgotten ; while the conduct of the Flemish court proved the cause of constant un- easiness not only to the cardinal but to the whole Spanish nation. All the great qualities of Ghievres, the prime minister and favourite of the young king, were sullied with an ignoble and sordid avarice. The accession of 46 Gometius, lib. vi p. 179. BOOK I.] EMPEROIl CHAKLES THE FIl'TH. 329 his master to the crown of Spain opened a new and copious source for the gratification of this passion. During the time of Charles's residence in Flanders the whole tribe of pretenders to offices or to favour resorted thither. They soon discovered that without the patronage of Chievres it was vain to hope for preferment ; nor did they want sagacity to find out the proper method of securing his protection. Great sums of money were drawn out of Spain. Every thing was venal and dis- posed of to the highest bidder. After the example of Chievres, the inferior Flemish ministers engaged in this traffic, which became as general and avowed as it was infamous. 46 The Spaniards were filled with rage when they beheld offices of great importance to the welfare of their country set to sale by strangers, unconcerned for its honour or its happiness. Ximenes, disinterested in his whole administration, and a stranger, from his native grandeur of mind, to the passion of avarice, inveighed with the utmost boldness against the venality of the Flemings. He represented to the king, in strong terms, the murmurs and indignation which their behaviour excited among a free and high-spirited people, and besought him to set out without loss of time for Spain, that by his presence he might dissipate the clouds which were gathering all over the kingdom. 47 Charles was fully sensible that he had delayed too long to take possession of his dominions in Spain. Powerful obstacles, however, stood in his way and de- tained him in the Low Countries. The war which the League of Cambray had kindled in Italy still subsisted ; though during its course the armies of all the parties engaged in it had changed their destination and their objects. France was now in alliance with Venice, which it had at first combined to destroy. Maximilian and Ferdinand had for some years earned on hostilities 46 Miniana, Contin., lib. i. c. 2. 47 P. Martyr. Ep., 576 330 REIGN OF THE [BOOK L against France, their original ally, to the valour of whose troops the confederacy had been indebted in a great measure for its success. Together with his king- doms, Ferdinand transmitted this war to his grandson ; and there was reason to expect that Maximilian, always fond of new enterprises, would persuade the young monarch to enter into it with ardour. But the Flemings, who had long possessed an extensive commerce, which during the League of Cambray had grown to a great height upon the ruins of the Venetian trade, dreaded a rupture with France ; and Chievres, sagacious to discern the true interest of his country, and not warped on this occasion by his love of wealth, warmly declared for maintaining peace with the French nation. Francis I., destitute of allies, and solicitous to secure his late con- quests in Italy by a treaty, listened with joy to the first overtures of accommodation. Chievres himself con- ducted the negotiation in the name of Charles. Gouffier appeared as plenipotentiary for Francis. Each of them had presided over the education of th prince whom he represented. They had both adopted the same pacific system, and were equally persuaded that the union of the two monarchs was the happiest event for themselves, as well as for their kingdoms. In such hands the negotiation did not languish. A few days after opening their conferences at Noyon, they concluded a treaty of confederacy and mutual defence between the two monarchs, the chief articles in which were that Francis should give in marriage to Charles his eldest daughter, the princess Louise, an infant of a year old, and, as her dowry, should make over to him all his claims and pre- tensions upon the kingdom of Naples ; that, in con- sideration of Charles's being already in possession of Naples, he should, until the accomplishment of the mar- riage, pay a hundred thousand crowns a year to the French king, and the half of that sum annually as long BOOK L] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 331 as the princess had no children ; that when Charles shall arrive in Spain the heirs of the king of Navarre may represent to him their right to that kingdom, and if, after examining their claim, he does not give them satis- faction, Francis shall be at liberty to assist them with all his forces. 48 This alliance not only united Charles and Francis, but obliged Maximilian, who was unable alone to cope with the French and Venetians, to enter into a treaty with those powers, which put a final period to the bloody and tedious war that the League of Cambray had occasioned. Europe enjoyed a few years of universal tranquillity, and was indebted for that blessing to two princes whose rivalship and ambition kept it in per- petual discord and agitation during the remainder of their reigns. By the treaty of Noyon, Charles secured a safe pas- sage into Spain. It was not, however, the interest of his Flemish ministers that he should visit that kingdom soon. While he resided in Flanders, the revenues of the Spanish crown were spent there, and they engrossed, without any competitors, all the effects of their monarch's generosity ; their country became the seat of government, and all favours were dispensed by them. Of all these advantages they ran the risk of seeing themselves deprived from the moment that their sove- reign entered Spain. The Spaniards would naturally assume the direction of their own affairs ; the Low Countries would be considered only as a province of that mighty monarchy ; and they who now distributed the favours of the prince to others must then be content to receive them from the hands of strangers. But what Chievres chiefly wished to avoid was an interview between the king and Ximenes. On the one hand, the wisdom, the integrity, and the magnanimity of that prelate gave him a wonderful ascendant over the minds 48 Leonard, Recueil des Traites, toin. ii. p. 69. 332 fcElGN OF THE [BOOK t. of men ; and it was extremely probable that these great qualities, added to the reverence due to his age and office, would command the respect of a young prince who, capable of noble and generous sentiments himself, would, in proportion to his admiration of the cardinal's virtues, lessen his deference towards persons of another character. Or, on the other hand, if Charles should allow his Flemish favourites to retain all the influence over his councils which they at present possessed, it was easy to foresee that the cardinal would remonstrate loudly against such an indignity to the Spanish nation, and vindicate the rights of his country with the same intrepidity and success with which he had asserted the prerogatives of the crown. For these reasons, all his Flemish councillors combined to retard his departure ; and Charles, unsuspicious, from want of experience, and fond of his native country, suffered himself to be un- necessarily detained in the Netherlands a whole year after signing the treaty of Noyon. The repeated entreaties of Ximenes, the advice of his grandfather Maximilian, and the impatient murmurs of his Spanish subjects, prevailed on him at last to embark. He was attended not only by Chievres, his prime minister, but by a numerous and splendid train of the Flemish nobles, fond of beholding the grandeur or of sharing in the bounty of their prince. After a dan- gerous voyage, he landed at Villa Viciosa, in the province of Asturias, and was received with such loud acclamations of joy as a new monarch, whose arrival was so ardently desired, had reason to expect. The Spanish nobility resorted to their sovereign from all parts of the kingdom, and displayed a magnificence which the Flemings were nnable to emulate. 49 Ximenes, who considered the presence of the king as the greatest blessing to his dominions, was advancing 49 P. Martyr. Ep., 599, 601. BOOK I.] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 333 towards the coast as fast as the infirm state of his health would permit, in order to receive him. During his regency, and notwithstanding his extreme old age, he had abated in no degree the rigour or frequency of his mortifications ; and to these he added such laborious assiduity in business as would have worn out the most youthful and vigorous constitution. Every day he employed several hours in devotion ; he celebrated mass in person ; he even allotted some space for study. Not- withstanding these occupations, he regularly attended the council ; he received and read all papers presented to him; he dictated letters and instructions, and took under his inspection all business, civil, ecclesiastical, or military. Every moment of his time was filled up with some serious employment. The only amusement in which he indulged himself, by way of relaxation after business, was to canvass, with a few friars and other divines, some intricate article in scholastic theology. Wasted by such a course of life, the infirmities of age daily grew upon him. On his journey, a violent dis- order seized him at Bos Equillos, attended with un common symptoms, which his followers considered as the effect of poison, 50 but could not agree whether the crime ought to be imputed to the hatred of the Spanish nobles or to the malice of the Flemish courtiers. This accident obliging him to stop short, he wrote to Charles, and with his usual boldness advised him to dismiss all the strangers in his train, whose numbers and credit gave offence already to the Spaniards and would ere long alienate the affections of the whole people. At the same time, he earnestly desired to have an interview with the king, that he might inform him of the state of the nation and the temper of his subjects. To prevent this, not only the Flemings but the Spanish grandees employed all their address, and industriously kept M Miniana, Con tin., lib. i c. 3. 334 EEIGN OP THE [BOOK i. Charles at a distance from Aranda, the place to which the cardinal had removed. Through their suggestions, every measure that he recommended was rejected, the utmost care was taken to make him feel, and to point out to the whole nation, that his power was on the decline ; even in things purely trivial, such a choice was always made as was deemed most disagreeable to him. Ximenes did not bear this treatment with his usual fortitude of spirit. Conscious of his own integrity and merit, he expected a more grateful return from a prince to whom he delivered a kingdom more flourishing than it had been in any former age, together with authority more extensive and better established than the most illustrious of his ancestors had ever possessed. He could not therefore, on many occasions, refrain from giving vent to his indignation and complaints. He lamented the fate of his country, and foretold the calamities which it would suffer from the insolence, the rapaciousness, and ignorance of strangers. While his mind was agitated by these passions, he received a letter from the king, in which, after a few cold and formal expressions of regard, he was allowed to retire to his diocese, that, after a life of such continued labour, he might end his days in tran- quillity. This message proved fatal to Ximenes. His haughty mind, it is probable, could not survive disgrace ; perhaps his generous heart could not bear the prospect of the misfortunes ready to fall on his country. Which- soever of these opinions we embrace, certain it is that he expired a few hours after reading the letter. 51 The variety, the grandeur, and the success of his schemes, during a regency of only twenty months, leave it doubt- ful whether his sagacity in council, his prudence in conduct, or his boldness in execution deserve the greatest praise. His reputation is still high in Spain, not only 61 Marsollier, Vie de Xime'nes, etc. Baudier, Hist, de Xime'nea, p. 447. Gometius, lib. vii. p. 206, ii p. 208. BOOK i.] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 335 for wisdom, but for sanctity ; and he is the only prime minister mentioned in history whom his contemporaries reverenced as a saint, 52 and to whom the people under his government ascribed the power of working miracles. Soon after the death of Ximenes, Charles made his public entry, with great pomp, into Yalladolid, whither he had summoned the cortes of Castile. Though he assumed on all occasions the name of king, that title had never been acknowledged in the cortes. The Spaniards considering Joanna as possessed of the sole right to the crown, and no example of a son's having enjoyed the title of king during the life of his parents occurring in their history, the cortes discovered all that scrupulous respect for ancient forms, and that aversion to innovation, which are conspicuous in popular assem- blies. The presence, however, of their prince, the address, the artifices, and the threats of his ministers, prevailed on them at last to proclaim him king, in con- junction with his mother, whose name they appointed to be placed before that of her son in all public acts. But when they made this concession they declared that if at any future period Joanna should recover the exercise of reason, the whole authority should return into her hands. At the same time, they voted a free gift of six hundred thousand ducats, to be paid in three years, a sum more considerable than had ever been granted to any former monarch. 53 Notwithstanding this obsequiousness of the cortes to the will of the king, the most violent symptoms of dis- satisfaction with his government began to break out in the kingdom. Chievres had acquired over the mind of the young monarch the ascendant not only of a tutor, but of a parent. Charles seemed to hae no sentiments " Fldcliier, Vie de Xim^nfes, ii. P. Martyr. Ep. 608. Sandoval, 746. p. 12. 53 Miniana, Contin., lib. i c. 3. 336 REIGN OF THE [BOOK i. but those which, his minister inspired, and scarcely uttered a word but what he put into his mouth. He was constantly surrounded by Flemings ; no person got access to him without their permission ; nor was any admitted to audience but in their presence. As he spoke the Spanish language very imperfectly, his answers were always extremely short, and often delivered with hesi- tation. From all these circumstances, many of the Spaniards were led to believe that he was a prince of a slow and narrow genius. Some pretended to discover a strong resemblance between him and his mother, and began to whisper that his capacity for government would never be far superior to hers ; and though they who had the best opportunity of judging concerning his character maintained that, notwithstanding such unpromising ap- pearances, he possessed a large fund of knowledge as well as of sagacity, 54 yet all agreed in condemning his partiality towards the Flemings, and his attachment to his favourites, as unreasonable and immoderate. Un- fortunately for Charles, these favourites were unworthy of his confidence. To amass wealth seems to have been their only aim ; and, as they had reason to fear that either their master's good sense or the indignation of the Spaniards might soon abridge their power, they hastened to improve the present opportunity, and their avarice was the more rapacious because they expected their authority to be of no long duration. All honours, offices, and benefices were either engrossed by the Flemings or publicly sold by them. Chievres, his wife, and Sauvage, whom Charles, on the death of Ximenes, had imprudently raised to be chancellor of Castile, vied with each other in all the refinements of extortion and venality. Not only the Spanish historians, who, from resentment, may be suspected of exaggeration, but Peter Martyr Angleria, an Italian, who resided at that time in 54 Sandoval, p. 31, P. Martyr. Ep. 655. POOR i.] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 337 the court of Spain and who was under no temptation to deceive the persons to whom his letters are addressed, give a description which is almost incredible of the insatiable and shameless covetousness of the Flemings. According to Angleria's calculation, which he asserts to be extremely moderate, they remitted into the Low Countries, in the space of ten months, no less a sum than a million and one hundred thousand ducats. The nomination of William de Croy, Chievres's nephew, a young man not of canonical age, to the archbishopric of Toledo, exasperated the Spaniards more than all these exactions. They considered the elevation of a stranger to the head of their Church and to the richest benefice in the kingdom not only as an injury, but as an insult to the whole nation ; both clergy and laity, the former from interest, the latter from indignation, joined in exclaiming against it. 55 Charles, leaving Castile thus disgusted with his administration, set out for Saragossa, the capital of Aragon, that he might be present in the cortes of that kingdom. On his way thither he took leave of his brother Ferdinand, whom he sent into Germany on the pretence of visiting their grandfather, Maximilian, in his old age. To this prudent precaution Charles owed the preservation of his Spanish dominions. During the violent commotions which arose there soon after this period, the Spaniards would infallibly have offered the crown to a prince who was the darling of the whole nation ; nor did Ferdinand want ambition, or coun- sellors, that might have prompted him to accept of the offer. 56 The Aragonese had not hitherto acknowledged Charles as king, nor would they allow the cortes to be assembled 55 Sandoval, pp. 28-31. P. Mar- c. 3, p. 8. tyr. Ep., 608, 611,613, 614, 622, 56 P. Martyr. Ep., 619. Ferre- 623, 639. Miniana, Contin., lib. i ras, viii. 460. VOL. I. 338 &EIGN OF THE [BOOK i. in his name, but in that of the justiza, to whom during an interregnum this privilege belonged. 57 The opposi- tion Charles had to struggle with in the cortes of Aragon was more violent and obstinate than that which he had overcome in Castile : after long delays, how- ever, and with much difficulty, he persuaded the mem- bers to confer on him the title of king, in conjunction with his mother. At the same time he bound himself, by that solemn oath which the Aragonese exacted of their kings, never to violate any of their rights or liberties. When a donative was demanded, the mem- bers were still more intractable ; many months elapsed before they would agree to grant Charles two hundred thousand ducats, and that sum they appropriated so strictly for paying debts of the crown, which had long been forgotten, that a very small part of it came into the king's hands. What had happened in Castile taught them caution, and determined them rather to satisfy the claims of their fellow-citizens, how obsolete soever, than to furnish strangers the means of enriching themselves with the spoils of their country. 58 During these proceedings of the cortes, ambassadors arrived at Saragossa from Francis I. and the young king of Navarre, demanding the restitution of that kingdom in terms of the treaty of Noyon. But neither Charles, nor the Castilian nobles whom he consulted on this occasion, discovered any inclination to part with this acquisition. A conference held soon after at Montpellier, in order to bring this matter to an amicable issue, was altogether fruitless : while the French urged the injustice of the usurpation, the Spaniards were attentive only to its importance. 59 From Aragon, Charles proceeded to Catalonia, where he wasted much time, encountered more difficulties, 47 P. Martyr. Ep., 605. M Ibid., 605, 633, 640 M Ibid., 615-634. BOOK i.] EMPEROR CHARLES THE ElETH. 339 and gained less money. The Flemings were now be- come so odious in every province of Spain by their exactions that the desire of mortifying them and of disappointing their avarice augmented the jealousy with which a free people usually conduct their deli- berations. The Castilians, who had felt most sensibly the weight and rigour of the oppressive schemes carried on by the Flemings, resolved no longer to submit with a tameness fatal to themselves, and which rendered them the ob- jects of scorn to their fellow-subjects in the other king- doms of which the Spanish monarchy was composed. Segovia, Toledo, Seville, and several other cities of the first rank, entered into a confederacy for the defence of their rights and privileges; and, notwithstanding the silence of the nobility, who on this occasion dis- covered neither the public spirit nor the resolution which became their order, the confederates laid before the king a full view of the state of the kingdom and of the maladministration of his favourites. The prefer- ment of strangers, the exportation of the current coin, the increase of taxes, were the grievances of which they chiefly complained ; and of these they demanded redress with that boldness which is natural to a free people. These remonstrances, presented at first at Saragossa, and renewed afterwards at Barcelona, Charles treated with great neglect. The confederacy, however, of these cities, at this juncture, was the beginning of that famous union among the commons of Castile, which not long after threw the kingdom into such violent convulsions as shook the throne and almost over- turned the constitution. 60 Soon after Charles's arrival at Barcelona he received the account of an event which interested him much more than the murmurs of the Castilians or the scruples 60 P. Martyr. Ep,, 630. Ferreras, viiL 464. l 2 340 EEIGN OP THE [BOOK i. of the cortes of Catalonia. This was the death of the emperor Maximilian, an occurrence of small impor- tance in itself, for he was a prince conspicuous neither for his virtues, nor his power, nor his abilities, but rendered by its consequences more memorable than any that had happened during several ages. It broke that profound and universal peace which then reigned in the Christian world; it excited a rivalship between two princes, which threw all Europe into agitation, and kindled wars more general and of longer duration than had hitherto been known in - which was no less entitled than his other kingdoms to the honour of their sovereign's presence, declared that by the fundamental laws of the constitution they could neither acknowledge as king a person who was absent, jior grant him any subsidy ; and to this declaration they adhered with a haughty and inflexible obstinacy. Charles, piqued by their behaviour, decided in favour of the people, and rashly authorized them to continue in arms. Their deputies returned in triumph, and were received by their fellow-citizens as the deliverers of their country. The insolence of the multitude increas- ing with their success, they expelled all the nobles out of the city, committed the government to magistrates of their own election, and entered into an association, dis- tinguished by the name of germanada or brotherhood, which proved the source not only of the wildest dis- orders, but of the most fatal calamities, in that king- dom. 77 77 P. Martyr. Ep., 651. Ferreras, viii. 376, 485. A A2 356 REIGN OF THE [BOOK i. Meanwhile, the kingdom of Castile was agitated with no less violence. No sooner was the emperor's intention to leave Spain made known, than several cities of the first rank resolved to remonstrate against it, and to crave redress once more of those grievances which they had formerly laid before him. Charles artfully avoided ad- mitting their deputies to audience ; and, as he saw from this circumstance how difficult it would be at this junc- ture to restrain the mutinous spirit of the greater cities, he summoned the cortes of Castile to meet at Compos- tella, a town in Galicia. His only reason for calling that assembly was the hope of obtaining another donative ; for, as his treasury had been exhausted in the same proportion that the riches of his ministers increased, he could not, without some additional aid, appear in Germany with splendour suited to the imperial dignity. To appoint a meeting of the cortes in so remote a province, and to demand a new subsidy before the time for paying the former was expired, were innovations of a most dangerous tendency, and among a people not only jealous of their liberties, but accustomed to supply the wants of their sovereigns with a very frugal hand, excited a universal alarm. The magistrates of Toledo remonstrated against both these measures in a very high tone ; the inhabitants of Yalladolid, who expected that the cortes should have been held in that city, were so enraged that they took arms in a tumultuary manner ; and if Charles, with his" foreign counsellors, had not fortunately made their escape during a violent tempest, they would have massacred all the Flemings, and have prevented him from continuing his journey towards Compostella. Every city through which he passed petitioned against holding a cortes in Galicia, a point with regard to which Charles was inflexible. But though the utmost influ- ence had been exerted by the ministers in order to pro- BOOK i.] EMPEROR CHAELES THE FIFTH. 357 cure a choice of representatives favourable to their designs, such was the temper of the nation that at the opening of the assembly there appeared among many of the members unusual symptoms of ill-humour, which threatened a fierce opposition to all the measures of the court. No representatives were sent by Toledo ; for the lot, according to which, by ancient custom, the election was determined in that city, having fallen upon two persons devoted to the Flemish ministers, their fellow-citizens refused to grant them a commission in the usual form, and in their stead made choice of two deputies, whom they empowered to repair to Compos- tella and to protest against the lawfulness of the cortes assembled there. The representatives of Salamanca refused to take the usual oath of fidelity unless Charles consented to change the place of meeting. Those of Toro, Madrid, Cordova, and several other places declared the demand of another donative to be unprecedented, unconstitutional, and unnecessary. All the arts, how- ever, which influence popular assemblies, bribes, pro- mises, threats, and even force, were employed in order to gain members. The nobles, soothed by the respectful assiduity with which Chievres and the other Flemings paid court to them, or instigated by a mean jealousy of that spirit of independence which they saw rising among the commons, openly favoured the pretensions of the . court, or at the utmost did not oppose them ; and at last, in contempt not only of the sentiments of the nation, but of the ancient forms of the constitution, a majority voted to grant the donative for which the emperor had applied. 78 Together with this grant, the cortes laid before Charles a representation of those grievances whereof his people complained, and in their name craved redress; but he, having obtained from them all that he could expect, paid no attention to this 78 P. Martyr. Ep., 663. Sandoval, p. 32, etc. 358 BEIGN OF CHARLES THE FIFTH. [BOOK t. ill-timed petition, which it was no longer dangerous to disregard. 79 As nothing now retarded his embarkation, he dis- closed his intention with regard to the regency of Castile during his absence, which he had hitherto kept secret, and nominated Cardinal Adrian to that office. The viceroyalty of Aragon he conferred on Don John de Lanuza ; that of Valencia on Don Diego de Mendoza, Conde de Melito. The choice of the two latter was universally acceptable ; but the advancement of Adrian, though the only Fleming who had preserved any re- putation among the Spaniards, animated the Castilians with new hatred against foreigners; and even the nobles, who had so tamely suffered other inroads upon the constitution, felt the indignity offered to their own order by his promotion, and remonstrated against it as being illegal. But Charles's desire of visiting Germany, as well as the impatience of his ministers to leave Spain, were now so much increased that, without attending to the murmurs of the Castilians, or even taking time to provide any remedy against an insurrection in Toledo, which at that time threatened, and afterwards produced, most formidable effects, he sailed from Corunna on the 22d of May ; and by setting out so abruptly in quest of a new crown he endangered a more important one of which he was already in possession. 80 79 Sandoval, p. 84. * P. Martyr. Ep., 670. Sandoval, p. 86. BOOK II. Rivalry between Charles and Francis I. for the Empire. They negotiate with the Pope, the Venetians, and Henry VIII. of England. Character of the latter. Cardinal Wolsey. Charles visits England. Meeting between Henry VIII. and Francis I. Coronation of Charles. Solyman the Magnificent. The Diet convoked at Worms. The Reformation. Sale of Indulgences by Leo X. Tetzel. Luther. Progress of his Opinions. Is summoned to Rome. His Appearance before the Legate. He appeals to a General Council. Luther questions the Papal Authority. Reformation in Switzerland. Ex- communication of Luther. Reformation in Germany. Causes of the Progress of the Reformation. The Corruption in the Roman Church. Power and Ill-Conduct of the Clergy. Venality of the Roman Court. Effects of the Invention of Printing. Erasmus. The Diet at Worms. Edict against Luther. He is seized and con- fined at Wartburg. His Doctrines condemned by the University of Paris, and controverted by Henty VIII. of England. Henry VIII. favours the Emperor Charles against Francis I. Leo X. makes a Treaty with Charles. Death of Chievres. Hostilities in Navarre and in the Low Countries. Siege of Mdzieres. Congress at Calais. League against France. Hostilities in Italy. Death of Leo X. Defeat of the French. Henry VIII. declares War against France. Charles visits England. Conquest of Rhodes by Solyman. MANY concurring circumstances not only called Charles's thoughts towards the affairs of Germany, but rendered his presence in that country necessary. The electors grew impatient of so long an interregnum; his hereditary dominions were disturbed by intestine commotions ; and the new opinions concerning religion made such rapid progress as required the most serious consideration. But, above all, the motions of the French king drew his attention, and convinced him that it was necessary to take measures for his own defence with no less speed than vigour. When Charles and Francis entered the lists as candi- 360 REIGN OP THE [BOOK n dates for the imperial dignity, they conducted their rivalship with many professions of regard for each other, and with repeated declarations that they would not suffer any tincture of enmity to mingle itself with this honourable emulation. " We both court the same mistress," said Francis, with his usual vivacity ; " each ought to urge his suit with all the address of which he is master : the most fortunate will prevail, and the other must rest contented." 1 But though two young and high-spirited princes, and each of them animated with the hope of success, might be capable of forming such a generous resolution, it was soon found that they pro- mised upon a moderation too refined and disinterested for human nature. The preference given to Charles in the sight of all Europe mortified Francis extremely, and inspired him with all the passions natural to disap- pointed ambition. To this was owing the personal jealousy and rivalship which ^subsisted between the two monarchs during their whole reign ; and the rancour of these, augmented by a real opposition of interest, which gave rise to many unavoidable causes of discord, involved them in almost perpetual hostilities. Charles had paid no regard to the principal article in the treaty of Noyon, by refusing oftener than once to do justice to John d'Albret, the excluded monarch of Navarre, whom Francis was bound in honour and prompted by interest to restore to his throne. The French king had preten- sions to the crown of Naples, of which Ferdinand had deprived his predecessor by a most unjustifiable breach of faith. The emperor might reclaim the duchy of Milan as a fief of the empire, which Francis had seized, and still kept in possession, without having received investiture of it from the emperor. Charles considered the duchy of Burgundy as the patrimonial domain of his ancestors, wrested from them by the unjust policy of 1 Guic., lib. xiii. p. 169. BOOK ii.] EMPEEOE CHARLES THE FIFTH. 361 Louis XI., and observed with the greatest jealousy the strict connections which Francis had formed with the duke of Gueldres, the hereditary enemy of his family. When the sources of discord were so many and various, peace could be of no long continuance, even between princes the most exempt from ambition or emulation. But as the shock between two such mighty antagonists could not fail of being extremely violent, they both discovered no small solicitude about its con- sequences, and took time not only to collect and to ponder their own strength and to compare it with that of their adversary, but to secure the friendship or assist- ance of the other European powers. The pope had equal reason to dread the two rivals, and saw that he who prevailed would become absolute master in Italy. If it had been in his power to engage them in hostilities without rendering Lombardy the theatre of war, nothing would have been more agree- able to him than to see them waste each other's strength in endless quarrels. But this was impossible. Leo foresaw that on the first rupture between the two monarchs the armies of France and Spain would take the field in the Milanese ; and while the scene of their operations was so near, and the subject for which they contended so interesting to him, he could not long remain neuter. He was obliged, therefore, to adapt his plan of conduct to his political situation. He courted and soothed the emperor and king of France with equal industry and address. Though warmly solicited by each of them to espouse his cause, he assumed all the appear- ances of entire impartiality, and attempted to conceal his real sentiments under that profound dissimulation which seems to have been affected by most of the Italian politicians in that age. The views and interests of the Venetians were not different from those of the pope ; nor were they less 362 REIGN Ol 1 THE [BOOK n. solicitous to prevent Italy from becoming the seat of war, and their own republic from being involved in the quarrel. But through all Leo's artifices, and notwith- standing his high pretensions to a perfect neutrality, it was visible that he leaned towards the emperor, from whom he had both more to fear and more to hope than from Francis ; and it was equally manifest that if it became necessary to take a side the Venetians would, from motives of the same nature, declare for the king of France. No considerable assistance, however, was to be expected from the Italian states, who were jealous to an extreme degree of the Transalpine powers, and careful to preserve the balance even between them, unless when they were seduced to violate this favourite maxim of their policy by the certain prospect of some great advantage to themselves. But the chief attention both of Charles and of Francis was employed in order to gain the king of England, from whom each of them expected assistance more effectual and afforded with less political caution. Henry VIII. had ascended the throne of that kingdom in the year 1509, with such circumstances of advantage as promised a reign of distinguished felicity and splen- dour. The union in his person of the two contending titles of York and Lancaster, the alacrity and emulation with which both factions obeyed his commands, not only enabled him to exert a degree of vigour and authority in his domestic government which none of his prede- cessors could have safely assumed, but permitted him to take a share in the affairs of the Continent, from which the attention of the English had long been diverted by their unhappy intestine divisions. The great sums of money which his father had amassed rendered him the most wealthy prince in Europe. The peace which had subsisted under the cautious administration of that monarch had been of sufficient length to recruit the BOOK n.] EMPEEOE CHARLES THE FIFTH. 363 population of the kingdom after the desolation of the civil wars, but not so long as to enervate its spirit ; and the English,* ashamed of having rendered their own country so long a scene of discord and bloodshed, were eager to display their valour in some foreign war, and to revive the memory of the victories gained on the Continent by their ancestors. Henry's own temper perfectly suited the state of his kingdom and the dispo- sition of his subjects. Ambitious, active, enterprising, and accomplished in all the martial exercises which in that age formed a chief part in the education of persons of noble birth and inspired them with an early love of war, he longed to engage in action, and to signalize the beginning of his reign by some remarkable exploit. An opportunity soon presented itself ; and the victory at Guinegate, together with the successful sieges of Terou- enne and Tournay, though of little utility to England, reflected great lustre on its monarch, and confirmed the idea which foreign princes entertained of his power and consequence. So many concurring causes, added to the happy situation of his own dominions, which secured them from foreign invasion, and to the fortunate cir- cumstance of his being in possession of Calais, which served not only as a key to France, but opened an easy passage into the Netherlands, rendered the king of England the natural guardian of the liberties of Europe, and the arbiter between the emperor and French monarch. Henry himself was sensible of this singular advantage, and convinced that, in order to preserve the balance even, it was his office to prevent either of the rivals from acquiring such superiority of power as might be fatal to the other, or formidable to the rest of Christendom. But he was destitute of the penetration, and still more of the temper, which such a delicate function required. Influenced by caprice, by vanity, by resentment, by affection, he was incapable of forming any regular and 364 HEIGN OF THE L*<> K tt extensive system of policy or of adhering to it with steadiness. His measures seldom resulted from attention to the general welfare or from a deliberate regard to his own interest, but were dictated by passions which ren- dered him blind to both, and prevented his gaining that ascendant in the affairs of Europe, or from reaping such advantages to himself, as a prince of greater art, though with inferior talents, might have easily secured. All the impolitic steps in Henry's administration must not, however, be imputed to defects in his own character ; many of them were owing to the violent passions and insatiable ambition of his prime minister and favourite, Cardinal Wolsey. This man, from one of the lowest ranks in life, had risen to a height of power and dignity to which no English subject ever arrived, and governed the haughty, presumptuous, and untractable spirit of Henry with absolute authority. Great talents, and of very different kinds, fitted him for the two opposite stations of minister and of favourite. His profound judgment, his unwearied industry, his thorough acquaintance with the state of the kingdom, his extensive knowledge of the views and interest of foreign courts, qualified him for that uncontrolled direction of affairs with which he was intrusted. The elegance of his manners, the gaiety of his conversation, his insinuating address, his love of magnificence, and his proficiency in those parts of literature of which Henry was fond, gained him the affection and confi- dence of the young monarch. Wolsey was far from employing this vast and almost royal power to promote cither the true interest of the nation or the real grandeur of his master. Rapacious at the same time, and profuse, he was insatiable in desiring wealth. Of boundless ambition, he aspired after new honours with an eager- ness unabated by his former success ; and being rendered presumptuous by his uncommon elevation, as well as by BOOK ii.] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 365 the ascendant which he had gained over a prince who scarcely brooked advice from any other person, he dis- covered in his whole demeanour the most overbearing haughtiness and pride. To these passions he himself sacrificed every consideration ; and whoever endeavoured to obtain his favour, or that of his master, found it necessary to soothe and to gratify them. As all the states of Europe sought Henry's friendship at that time, all courted his minister with incredible attention and obsequiousness, and strove, by presents, by promises, or by flattery, to work upon his avarice, his ambition, or his pride. 2 Francis had, in the year 1518, employed Bonnivet, admiral of France, one of his most accomplished and artful courtiers, to gain this haughty prelate. He himself bestowed on him every mark of respect and confidence. He consulted him with regard to his most important affairs, and received his responses with implicit deference. By these arts, together with the grant of a large pension, Francis attached the cardinal to his interest, who persuaded his master to surrender Tournay to France, to conclude a treaty of marriage between his daughter, the princess Mary, and the dauphin, and to consent to a personal interview with the French king. 3 From that time the most familiar intercourse subsisted between the two courts ; Francis, sensible of the great value of Wolsey's friendship, laboured to secure the continuance of it by every possible expression of regard, bestowing on him, in all his letters, the honourable appellations of father, tutor, and governor. Charles observed the progress of this ur^n with the utmost jealousy and concern. His near atfini'v to the king of England gave him some title to nifi friendship; and soon after his accession to the throne ol ruddle he 2 Fiddes's Life of Wolsey, 166. 3 Herbert's History of Henry Rymer's Fredera, xiii. 718. VIII., 30 Rymer, xiii. 624. 366 REIGN OF THE [BOOK n. had attempted to ingratiate himself with Wolsey, by settling on him a pension of three thousand livres. His chief solicitude at present was to prevent the intended interview with Francis, the effects of which upon two young princes, whose hearts were no less susceptible of friendship than their manners were capable of inspiring it, he extremely dreaded. But after many delays, occa- sioned by difficulties with respect to the ceremonial, and by the anxious precautions of both courts for the safety of their respective sovereigns, the time and place of meeting were at last fixed. Messengers had been sent to different courts, inviting all comers who were gentle- men to enter the lists at tilt and tournament against the two monarchs and their knights. Both Francis and Henry loved the splendour of these spectacles too well, and were too much delighted with the graceful figure which they made on such occasions, to forego the pleasure or glory which they expected from such a singular and brilliant assembly. Nor was the cardinal less fond of displaying his own magnificence in the presence of two courts, and of discovering to the two nations the extent of his influence over both their monarchs. Charles, finding it impossible to prevent the interview, endea- voured to disappoint its effects, and to preoccupy the favour of the English monarch and his minister by an act of complaisance still more flattering and more un- common. Having sailed from Corunna, as has already been related, he steered his course directly towards England, and, relying wholly on Henry's generosity for his own safety, landed at Dover. This unexpected visit surprised the nation. Wolsey, however, was well ac- quainted with the emperor's intention. A negotiation, unknown to the historians of that age, had been carried on between him and the court of Spain ; this visit had been concerted ; and Charles granted the cardinal, whom he calls his most dear friend^ an additional pension of BOOK ii.] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 367 seven thousand ducats. 4 Henry, who was then at Can- terbury, in his way to France, immediately despatched Wolsey to Dover in order to welcome the emperor, and, being highly pleased with an event so soothing to his vanity, hastened to receive with suitable respect a guest who had placed in him such unbounded confidence. Charles, to whom time was precious, stayed only four days in England ; but during that short space he had the address not only to give Henry favourable impressions of his character and intentions, but to detach Wolsey entirely from the interest of the French king. All the grandeur, the wealth, and the power which the cardinal possessed did not satisfy his ambitious mind while there was one step higher to which an ecclesiastic could ascend. The papal dignity had for some time been the object of his wishes ; and Francis, as the most effectual method of securing his friendship, had promised to favour his pretensions, on the first vacancy, with all his interest. But as the emperor's influence in the college of cardinals was greatly superior to that of the French king, Wolsey grasped eagerly at the offer which that artful prince had made him, of exerting it vigorously in his behalf ; and, allured by this prospect, which under the pontifi- cate of Leo, still in the prime of his life, was a very distant one, he entered with warmth into all the em- peror's schemes. No treaty, however, was concluded at that time between the two monarchs ; but Henry, in return for the honour which Charles had done him, pro- mised to visit him in some place of the Low Countries immediately after taking leave of the French king. His interview with that prince was in an open plain between Ghiisnes and Ardres, where the two kings and their attendants displayed their magnificence with such emulation and profuse expense as procured it the name of the Field of the Cloth of Gold. Feats of chivalry, 4 Rymer, xiii. 714. 308 REIGN OF THE [BOOK n. parties of gallantry, together with such exercises and pastimes as were in that age reckoned manly or elegant, rather than serious business, occupied both courts during eighteen days that they continued together. 5 Whatever impression the engaging manners of Francis, or the liberal and unsuspicious confidence with which he treated Henry, made on the mind of that monarch, was soon effaced by "Wolsey's artifices, or by an interview he had with the emperor at Gravelines, which was conducted with less pomp than that near Guisnes, but with greater attention to what might be of political utility. This assiduity with which the two greatest monarchs in Europe paid court to Henry appeared to him a plain acknowledgment that he held the balance in his hands, and convinced him of the justness of the motto he had chosen, " That whoever he favoured would pre- vail." In this opinion he was confirmed by an offer which Charles made, of submitting any difference that might arise between him and Francis to his sole arbi- tration. Nothing could have the appearance of greater candour and moderation than the choice of a judge who was reckoned the common friend of both. But, as the emperor had now attached Wolsey entirely to his in- 5 The French and English his- of Bretagne, the English gained torians describe the pomp of this the prize. After this, the kings of interview, and the various spec- France and England retired to a tacles, with great minuteness. One tent, where they drank together, circumstance mentioned by the and the king of England, seizing Mare'schal de Fleuranges, who was the king of France by the collar, present, and which must appear sin- said, ' My brother, I must wrestle gular in the present age, is com- with you,' and endeavoured once monly omitted. " After the tour- or twice to trip up his heels ; but the nament," says he, " the French and king of France, who is a dexterous English wrestlers made their ap- wrestler, twisted him round, and pearance, and wrestled in presence threw him on the earth with pro- of the kings and the ladies ; and as digious violence. The king of Eng- there were many stout wrestlers land wanted to renew the combat, there, it afforded excellent pastime ; but was prevented." Me'moires de but as the king of France had Fleuranges, 12mo, Paris, 1753, p. neglected to bring any wrestlers out 329. BOOK ii.] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFrH. 369 terest, no proposal could be more insidious, nor, as appeared by the sequel, more fatal to the French king. 6 Charles, notwithstanding his partial fondness for the Netherlands, the place of his nativity, made no long stay there, and, after receiving the homage and con- gratulations of his countrymen, hastened to Aix-la- Chapelle, the place appointed by the golden bull for the coronation of the emperor. There, in presence of an assembly more numerous and splendid than had appeared on any former occasion, the crown of Charle- magne was placed on his head, with all the pompous solemnity which the Germans affect in their public ceremonies, and which they deem essential to the dignity of their empire. 7 Almost at the same time Solyman the Magnificent, one of the most accomplished, enterprising, and vic- torious of the Turkish sultans, a constant and formid- able rival to the emperor, ascended the Ottoman throne. It was the peculiar glory of that period to produce the most illustrious monarchs who have at any one time appeared in Europe. Leo, Charles, Francis, Henry, and Solyman were each of them possessed of talents that might have rendered any age wherein they happened to nourish conspicuous. But such a constel- lation of great princes shed uncommon lustre on the sixteenth century. In every contest great power, as well as great abilities, were set in opposition ; the efforts of valour and conduct on one side, counter- balanced by an equal exertion of the same qualities on the other, not only occasioned such a variety of events as renders the history of that period interesting, but served to check the exorbitant progress of any of those princes, and to prevent their attaining such pre-eminence 6 Herbert, 37. ronat. Car. V., ap. Goldast. Polit 7 Hartman, Mauri Relatio To- Imperial. Franc., 1614, fol., p. 264 VOL. JL B B 370 BEIGN OP THfi t BOOK a - in power as would have been fatal to the liberty and happiness of mankind. The first act of the emperor's administration was to appoint a diet of the empire to be held at Worms on the 6th of January, 1521. In his circular letters to the different princes, he informed them that he had called this assembly in order to concert with them the most proper measures for checking the progress of those new and dangerous opinions which threatened to disturb the peace of Germany and to overturn the religion of their ancestors. Charles had in view the opinions which had been propagated by Luther and his disciples since the year 1517. As these led to that happy reformation in re- ligion which rescued one part of Europe from the papal yoke, mitigated its rigour in the other, and produced a revolution in the sentiments of mankind, the greatest as well as the most beneficial that has happened since the publication of Christianity, not only the events which at first gave birth to such opinions, but the causes which rendered their progress so rapid and successful, deserve to be considered with minute attention. To overturn a system of religious belief founded on ancient and deep-rooted prejudices, supported by power, and defended with no less art than industry, to establish in its room doctrines of the most contrary genius and tendency, and to accomplish all this, not by external violence or the force of arms, are opera- tions which historians the least prone to credulity and superstition ascribe to that Divine Providence which with infinite ease can bring about events which to human sagacity appear impossible. The interposition of heaven in favour of the Christian religion at its first publication was manifested by miracles and prophecies wrought and uttered in confirmation of it. Though none of the Eeformers possessed, or pretended to pos- BOOK n.] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 371 sess, these supernatural gifts, yet that wonderful pre- paration of circumstances which disposed the minds of men for receiving their doctrines that singular com- bination of causes which secured their success, and enabled men destitute of power and of policy to triumph over those who employed against them extraordinary efforts of both may be considered as no slight proof that the same hand which planted the Christian religion protected the Eeformed faith, and reared it from be- ginnings extremely feeble to an amazing degree of vigour and maturity. Tt was from causes seemingly fortuitous, and from a source very inconsiderable, that all the mighty effects of the Reformation flowed. Leo X., when raised to the papal throne, found the revenues of the Church exhausted by the vast projects of his two ambitious predecessors, Alexander VI. and Julius II. His own temper, naturally liberal and enterprising, rendered him incapable of that severe and patient economy which the situation of his finances required. On the contrary, his schemes for aggrandizing the family of Medici, his love of splendour, his taste for pleasure, and his magnificence in rewarding nien of genius, involved him daily in new expenses, in order to provide a fund for which, he tried every device that the fertile inven- tion of priests had fallen upon to drain the credulous multitude of their wealth. Among others, he had re- course to a sale of indulgences. According to the doc- trine of the Eomish Church, all the good works of the saints over and above those which were necessary towards their own justification are deposited, together with the infinite merits of Jesus Christ, in one inex- haustible treasury. The keys of this were committed to St. Peter, and to his successors the popes, who may open it at pleasure, and, by transferring a portion of this superabundant merit to any particular person for a B B 2 372 REIGN OF THE [BOOK n. sum of money, may convey to him either the pardon of his own sins, or a release for any one in whose hap- piness he is interested from the pains of purgatory. Such indulgences were first invented in the eleventh century by Urban II. as a recompense for those who went in person upon the meritorious enterprise of con- quering the Holy Land. They were afterwards granted to those who hired a soldier for that purpose, and in process of time were bestowed on such as gave money for accomplishing any pious work enjoined by the pope. 8 Julius II. had bestowed indulgences on all who contributed towards building the church of St. Peter at Eome ; and, as Leo was carrying on that magnifi- cent and expensive fabric, his grant was founded on the same pretence. 9 The right of promulgating these indulgences in Ger- many, together with a share in the profits arising from the sale of them, was granted to Albert, elector of Mentz and archbishop of Magdeburg, who, as his chief agent for retailing them in Saxony, employed Tetzel, a Dominican friar, of licentious morals, but of an active spirit, and remarkable for his noisy and popular elo- quence. He, assisted by the monks of his order, exe- cuted the commission with great zeal and success, but with little discretion or decency ; and though, by mag- nifying excessively the benefit of their indulgences, 10 8 History of the Council of Trent, solution used by Tetzel : " May our by F. Paul, p. 4. Lord Jesus Christ have mercy upon u Pallav., Hist. Cone. Trident., thee, and absolve thee by the merits p. 4. of his most holy passion. And I, 10 As the form of these indul- by his authority, that of his blessed gences, and the benefits which they Apostles Peter and Paul, and of the were supposed to convey, are un- most holy pope, granted and coin- known in Protestant countries, and mitted to me in these parts, do little understood, at present, in absolve thee, first from all eccle- several places where the Roman siastical censures, in whatever man- Catholic religion is established, I ner they have been incurred, and have, for the information of my then from all thy sins, transgres- readers, translated the form of ab- aions, and excesses, how enonnoui BOOK II.] EMPEEOR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 373 and by disposing of them at a very low price, they carried on for some time an extensive and lucrative traffic among the credulous and the ignorant, the ex- travagance of their assertions, as well as the irregulari- ties in their conduct, came at last to give general offence. The princes and nobles were irritated at see- ing their vassals drained of so much wealth in order to replenish the treasury of a profuse pontiff. Men of piety regretted the delusion of the people, who, being taught to rely for the pardon of their sins on the soever they may be, even from such as are reserved for the cognizance of the holy see ; and as far as the keys of the Holy Church extend, I remit to you all punishment which you deserve in purgatory on their account, and I restore you to the holy sacraments of the Church, to the unity of the faithful, and to that innocence and purity which you possessed at baptism ; so that, when you die, the gates of punishment shall be shut, and the gates of the paradise of delight shall be opened ; and if you shall not die at present, this grace shall remain in full force when you are at the point of death. In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost." Seckend., Comment., lib. i., p. 14. The terms in which Tetzel and his associates described the benefits of indulgences, and the necessity of purchasing them, are so extrava- gant that they appear to be almost incredible. If any man (said they) purchase letters of indulgence, his soul may rest secure with respect to its salvation. The souls con- fined in purgatory, for whose re- demption indulgences are purchased, as soon as the money tinkles in the chest, instantly escape from that place of torment and ascend into heaven. That the efficacy of in- dulgences was so great that the most heinous sins, even if one should violate (which was impossi- ble) the mother of God, would be remitted and expiated by them, and the person be freed both from punishment and guilt. That this was the unspeakable gift of God, in order to reconcile men to himself. That the cross erected by the preach- ers of indulgences was as efficacious as the cross of Christ itself. Lo ! the heavens are open ; if you enter not now, when will you enter? For twelve pence you may redeem the soul of your father out of purgatory ; and are you so ungrateful that you will not rescue your parent from torment ? If you had but one coat, you ought to strip yourself instantly, and sell it, in order to purchase such benefits, etc. These, and many such extravagant expressions, are selected out of Luther's works by Chemnitius in his Examen Concilii Tridentini, apud Henn. von der Hardt, Hist. Liter. Reform., pars iv. p. 6. The same author has published several of Tetzel's dis- courses, which prove that these ex- pressions were neither singular not exaggerated. Ibid., p. 14. 374 REIGN OF THE [BOOK n. indulgences which they purchased, did not think it incumbent on them either to study the doctrines taught by genuine Christianity or to practise the duties which it enjoins. Even the most unthinking were shocked at the scandalous behaviour of Tetzel and his associates, who often squandered, in drunkenness, gaming, and low debauchery, those sums which were piously be- stowed in hopes of obtaining eternal happiness ; and all began to wish that some check were given to this commerce, no less detrimental to society than destructive to religion. Such was the favourable juncture, and so disposed were the minds of his countrymen to listen to his discourses, when Martin Luther first began to call in question the efficacy of indulgences, and to declaim against the vicious lives and false doctrines of the per- sons employed in promulgating them. Luther was a native of Eisleben, in Saxony, and, though born of poor parents, had received a learned education, during the progress of which he gave many indications of uncommon vigour and acuteness of genius. His mind was naturally susceptible of serious sentiments, and tinctured with somewhat of that religious melancholy which delights in the solitude and devotion of a monastic life. The death of a companion, killed by lightning at his side in a violent thunder-storm, made such an impression on his mind as oo-operated with his natural temper in inducing him to retire into a con- vent of Augustinian friars, where, without suffering the entreaties of his parents to divert him from what he thought his duty to God, he assumed the habit of that order. He soon acquired great reputation, not only for piety, but for his love of knowledge and his un- wearied application to study. He had been taught the scholastic philosophy and theology, which were then in rogue, by very able masters, and wanted not penetra- BOOK H.] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 375 tion to comprehend all the niceties and distinctions with which they abound; but his understanding, na- turally sound, and superior to everything frivolous, soon became disgusted with those subtle and uninstructive sciences, and sought for some more solid foundation of knowledge and of piety in the Holy Scriptures. Having found a copy of the Bible, which lay neglected in the library of his monastery, he abandoned all other pur- suits, and devoted himself to the study of it with such eagerness and assiduity as astonished the monks, who were little accustomed to derive their theological no- tions from that source. The great progress which he made in this uncommon course of study augmented so much the fame both of his sanctity and of his learn- ing, that Frederic, elector of Saxony, having founded a university at Wittemberg on the Elbe, the place of his residence, Luther was chosen first to teach philo- sophy, and afterwards theology, there, and discharged both offices in such a manner that he was deemed the chief ornament of that society. While Luther was at the height of his reputation and authority, Tetzel began to publish indulgences in the neighbourhood of Wittemberg, and to ascribe to them the same imaginary virtues which had in other places imposed on the credulity of the people. As Saxony was not more enlightened than the other provinces of Germany, Tetzel met with prodigious success there. It was with the utmost concern that Luther beheld the artifices of those who sold, and the simplicity of those who bought, indulgences. The opinions of Thomas Aquinas and the other schoolmen, on which the doc- trine of indulgences was founded, had already lost much of their authority with him ; and the Scriptures, which he began to consider as the great standard of theological truth, afforded no countenance to a practice squally subversive of faith and of morals. His warm 376 EEIGN OF THE [BOOK n. and impetuous temper did not suffer him long to con- ceal such important discoveries, or to continue a silent spectator of the delusion of his countrymen. From the pulpit in the great church of Wittemberg he in- veighed hitterly against the irregularities and vices of the monks who published indulgences ; he ventured to examine the doctrines which they taught, and pointed out to the people the danger of relying for salvation upon any other means than those appointed by God in his word. The boldness and novelty of these opinions drew great attention, and, being recommended by the authority of Luther's personal character and delivered with a popular and persuasive eloquence, they made a deep impression on his hearers. Encouraged by the favourable reception of his doctrines among the people, he wrote to Albert, elector of Mentz and archbishop of Magdeburg, to whose jurisdiction that part of Saxony was subject, and remonstrated warmly against the false opinions, as well as wicked lives, of the preachers of indulgences; but he found that prelate too deeply in- terested in their success to correct their abuses. His next attempt was to gain the suffrage of men of learn- ing. For this purpose he published ninety -five theses, containing his sentiments with regard to indulgences. These he proposed, not as points fully established or of undoubted certainty, but as subjects of inquiry and disputation ; he appointed a day on which the learned were invited to impugn them, either in person or by writing ; to the whole he subjoined solemn protesta- tions of his high respect for the apostolic see, and of his implicit submission to its authority. No opponent appeared at the time prefixed ; the theses spread over Germany with astonishing rapidity ; they were read with the greatest eagerness ; and all admired the bold- ness of the man who had ventured not only to call in question the plenitude of papal power, but to attack the BOOK ii.] EMI'EEOR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 377 Dominicans, armed with all the terrors of inquisitorial authority. 11 The friars of St. Augustine, Luther's own order, though addicted with no less obsequiousness than the other monastic fraternities to the papal see, gave no check to the publication of these uncommon opinions. Luther had, by his piety and learning, acquired extra- ordinary authority among his brethren ; he professed the highest regard for the authority of the pope ; his professions were at that time sincere ; and as a secret enmity, excited by interest or emulation, subsists among all the monastic orders in the Romish Church, the Augustinians were highly pleased with his invectives against the Dominicans, and hoped to see them exposed to the hatred and scorn of the people. Nor was his sovereign, the elector of Saxony, the wisest prince at that time in Germany, dissatisfied with this obstruction which Luther threw in the way of the publication of indulgences. He secretly encouraged the attempt, and flattered himself that this dispute among the ecclesias- tics themselves might give some check to the exactions of the court of Rome, which the secular princes had long, though without success, been endeavouring to oppose. Many zealous champions immediately arose to defend opinions on which the wealth and power of the Church were founded, against Luther's attacks. In opposition to his theses, Tetzel published counter-theses at Frank- fort on the Oder ; Eccius, a celebrated divine of Augs- burg, endeavoured to refute Luther's notions ; and Prierias, a Dominican friar, master of the sacred palace, and inquisitor- general, wrote against him with all the virulence of a scholastic disputant. But the manner in which they conducted the controversy did little service 11 Lutheri Opera, Jense, 1612, of Council of Trent, by F. Paul, p. vol. i. praefat. 3, p. 2, 66. Hist. 4. Seckend., Com. ApoL, p. 16. 378 EEION OF THE [BOOK n. to their cause. Luther attempted to combat indulgences by arguments founded in reason or derived from Scrip- ture ; they produced nothing in support of them but the sentiments of schoolmen, the conclusions of the canon law, and the decrees of popes. 12 The decision of judges so partial and interested did not satisfy the people, who began to call in question the authority even of these venerable guides, when they found them standing in direct opposition to the dictates of reason and the deter- minations of the Divine law. 1 * 18 F. Paul, p. 6. Seckend.,p.40. Pallavic., p. 8. 13 Seckend.,p. 30. Guicciardini has asserted two things with regard to the first promulgation of indul- gences : 1. That Leo bestowed a gift of the profits arising from the sale of indulgences in Saxony, and the adjacent provinces of Germany, upon his sister Magdalen, the wife of Francescetto Cibo. (Guic., lib. xiii. 168.) 2. That Arcemboldo, a Genoese ecclesiastic, who had been bred a merchant, and still retained all the activity and ad- dress of that profession, was ap- pointed by her to collect the money which should be raised. F. Paul has followed him in both these par- ticulars ; and adds that the Augus- tinians in Saxony had been imme- morially employed in preaching in- dulgences, but that Arcemboldo and his deputies, hoping to gain more by committing this trust to the Dominicans, had made their bar- gain with Tetzel, and that Luther was prompted at first to oppose Tetzel and his associates by a desire of taking revenge for this injury of- fered to his order. (F. Paul, p. 5.) Almost all historians since their time, Popish as well as Protestant, have, without examination, admitted these assertions to be true upon their authority. But, notwithstand- ing the concurring testimony of two authors so eminent both for exact- ness and veracity, we may observe 1. That Felix Contolori, who searched the pontifical archives for the purpose, could not find this pretended grant to Leo's sister in any of those registers where it must necessarily have been recorded. (Pallav., p. 5.) 2. That the profits arising from indulgences in Saxony and the adjacent countries had been granted, not to Magdalen, but to Albert, archbishop of Mentz, who had the right of nominating those who published them. (Seek., p. 12 ; Luth. Oper., i., Praef. p. i. ; Pallav., p. 6.) 3. That Arcemboldo never had concern in the publica- tion of indulgences in Saxony : his district was Flanders and the Upper and Lower Bhine. (Seek., p. 14 ; Pallav., p. 6.) 4. That Luther and his adherents never mentioned this grant of Leo's to his sister, though a circumstance of which they could hardly have been ignorant, and which they would have been careful not to suppress. 5. The publication of indulgences in Ger- many was not usually committed to the Augustinians. The promul- gation of them, at three different periods under Julius II., was granted BOOK ii.] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 379 Meanwhile, these novelties in Luther's doctrines, which interested all Germany, excited little attention and no alarm in the court of Rome. Leo, fond of elegant and refined pleasures, intent upon great schemes of policy, a stranger to theological controversies, and apt to despise them, regarded with the utmost indiffer- ence the operations of an obscure friar who, in the heart of Germany, carried on a scholastic disputation in a barbarous style. Little did he apprehend, or Luther himself dream, that the effects of this quarrel would be so fatal to the papal see. Leo imputed the whole to monastic enmity and emulation, and seemed inclined not to interpose in the contest, but to allow the Augus- tinians and Dominicans to wrangle about the matter with their usual animosity. The solicitations, however, of Luther's adversaries, who were exasperated to a high degree by the boldness and severity with which he animadverted on their writings, together with the surprising progress which his opinions made in different parts of Germany, roused at last the attention of the court of Rome, and obliged Leo to take measures for the security of the Church to the Franciscans ; the Dominicans his opposition to their opinions and had been employed in the same vices proceeded from more laud- office a short time before the present able motives. (Seek., p. 1ft, 32; period. (Pallav., p. 46.) 6. The Lutheri Opera, i. p. 64, 6.) 8. A promulgation of those indulgences diploma of indulgences is published which first excited Luther's indig- by Henn. von der Hardt. ficm nation was intrusted to the arch- which it appears that the name of bishop of Mentz, in conjunction with the guardian of the Franciscans is the guardian of the Franciscans ; retained together with that of the but the latter having declined ac- archbishop, although the former cepting of that trust, the sole right did not act. The limits of the became vested in the archbishop. country to which thoir commission (Pallav., 6; Seek., 16, 17.) 7. Lu- extended, namely, the diocese of ther was not instigated by his supe- Mentz, Magdeburg, Halberstadt, and riors among the Augustinians to the territories of the marquis of attack the Dominicans, their rivals, Brandenburg, are mentioned in that or to depreciate indulgences because diploma. Hist. Literaria Reformat, they were promulgated by them : pars iv. p. 14. I.EIGN OF THE [BOOK n. against an attack that now appeared too serious to be despised. For this end, he summoned Luther to appear at Borne, within sixty days, before the auditor of the chamber and the inquisitor-general, Prierias, who had written against him, whom he empowered jointly to examine his doctrines and to decide concerning them. He wrote, at the same time, to the elector of Saxony, beseeching him not to protect a man whose heretical and profane tenets were so shocking to pious ears, and enjoined the provincial of the Augustinians to check by his authority the rashness of an arrogant monk, which brought disgrace upon the order of St. Augus- tine and gave offence and disturbance to the whole Church. [1518.] From the strain of these letters, as well as from the nomination of a judge so prejudiced and partial as Prierias, Luther easily saw what sentence he might expect at Eome. He discovered, for that reason, the utmost solicitude to have his cause tried in Germany and before a less suspected tribunal. The professors in the university of Wittemberg, anxious for the safety of a man who did so much honour to their society, wrote to the pope, and, after employing several pretexts to excuse Luther from appearing at Koine, entreated Leo to commit the examination of his doctrines to some persons of learning and authority in Germany. The elector requested the same thing of the pope's legate at the diet of Augsburg ; and as Luther himself, who at that time was so far from having any intention to disclaim the papal authority that he did not even entertain the smallest suspicion concerning its divine original, had written to Leo a most submissive letter, promising an unreserved compliance with his will, the pope gratified them so far as to empower his legate in Geiniany, Cardinal Cajetan, a Dominican, eminent for BOOK it.] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 381 scholastic learning, and passionately devoted to the Eoinan see, to hear and determine the cause. Luther, though he had good reason to decline a judge chosen among his avowed adversaries, did not hesitate about appearing before Cajetan, and, having obtained the emperor's safe-conduct, immediately repaired to Augsburg. The cardinal received him with decent re- spect, and endeavoured at first to gain upon him by gentle treatment. The cardinal, relying on the supe- riority of his own talents as a theologian, entered into a formal dispute with Luther concerning the doctrines contained in his theses. 14 But the weapons which they employed were so different, Cajetan appealing to papal decrees and the opinions of schoolmen, and Luther resting entirely on the authority of Scripture, that the contest was altogether fruitless. The cardinal relin- quished the character of a disputant, and, assuming that of a judge, enjoined Luther, by virtue of the apostolic powers with which he was clothed, to retract the errors which he had uttered with regard to indulgences and the nature of faith, and to abstain for the future from the publication of new and dangerous opinions. Luther, fully persuaded of the truth of his own tenets, and con- firmed in the belief of them by the approbation which they had met with among persons conspicuous both for learning and piety, was surprised at this abrupt mention of a recantation before any endeavours were used to convince him that he was mistaken. He had flattered himself that in a conference concerning the points in dispute with a prelate of such distinguished abilities he should be able to remove many of those imputations with which the ignorance or malice of his antagonists 14 In the former editions I as- sobre, in his Histoire de la Re'for- serted, upon the authority of Father mation, vol. i. p. 121, etc., has Paul, that Cajetan thought it be- satisfied me that I was mistaken, neath his dignity to enter into any See also Seckend., lib. i. p. 46, eta dispute with Luther ; but M. Beau- 382 EEIGN OF THE [BOOK u. had loaded him ; but the high tone of authority that the cardinal assumed extinguished at once all hopes of this kind, and cut off every prospect of advantage from the interview. His native intrepidity of mind, however, did not desert him. He declared with the utmost firm- ness that he could not, with a safe conscience, renounce opinions which he believed to be true ; nor should any consideration ever induce him to do what would be so base in itself and so offensive to God. At the same time, he continued to express no less reverence than formerly for the authority of the apostolic see ; 15 he signified hs willingness to submit the whole controversy to certain universities which he named, and promised neither to write nor to preach concerning indulgences for the future, provided his adversaries were likewise enjoined to be silent with respect to them. 16 All these offers Cajetan disregarded or rejected, and still insisted peremptorily on a simple recantation, threatening him with ecclesiastical censures, and forbidding him to appeal- again in his presence unless he resolved instantly to comply with what he had required. This haughty and violent manner of proceeding, as well as other circum- stances, gave Luther's friends such strong reasons to suspect that even the imperial safe-conduct would not be able to protect him from the legate's power and resentment, that they prevailed on him to withdraw secretly from Augsburg and to return to his own country. But before his departure, according to a form of which there had been some examples, he prepared a solemn appeal from the pope, ill informed at that time concerning his cause, to the pope when he should receive more full information with respect to it. 17 Cajetan, enraged at Luther's abrupt retreat and at 15 LutL, Oper., voL i. p. 164. Seckend., p. 45. LutL, Oper., 16 Ibid., 160. i. 163. 17 Sleid., Hist, of Reform., p. 7. BOOK ii.] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 383 the publication of his appeal, wrote to the elector of Saxony, complaining of both, and requiring him, as he regarded the peace of the Church or the authority of its head, either to send that seditious monk a prisoner to Rome, or to banish him out of his territories. It was not from theological considerations that Frederic had hitherto countenanced Luther : he seems to have been much a stranger to controversies of that kind, and to have been little interested in them. His pro- tection flowed almost entirely, as hath been already observed, from political motives, and was afforded with great secrecy and caution. He had neither heard any of Luther's discourses nor read any of his books ; and though all Germany resounded with his fame, he had never once admitted him into his presence. 18 But upon this demand which the cardinal made, it became neces- sary to throw off somewhat of his former reserve. He had been at great expense and had bestowed much attention on founding a new university, an object of considerable importance to every German prince; and, foreseeing how fatal a blow the removal of Luther would be to its reputation, 19 he, under various pretexts and with many professions of esteem for the cardinal, as well as of reverence for the pope, not only declined complying with either of his requests, but openly dis covered great concern for Luther's safety. 20 The inflexible rigour with which Cajetan insisted on a simple recantation gave great offence to Luther's followers in that age, and hath since been censured as imprudent by several popish writers. But it was im- possible for the legate to act another part. The judges before whom Luther had been required to appear at Rome were so eager to display their zeal against his 18 Seckend., p. 27. Sleid., Hist, SlekL, Hist, p. 10. Lutk, p. 12. Oper., i. 172. 19 Weekend., p. 59. 384 EEIGN OF THE [BOOK n. errors, that, without waiting for the expiration of sixty days allowed him in the citation, they had already con lomned him as a heretic. 21 Leo had, in several of his briefs and letters, stigmatized him as a child of iniquity and a man given up to a reprobate sense. Nothing less, therefore, than a recantation could save the honour of the Church, whose maxim it is never to abandon the smallest point that it has established, and which is even precluded, by its pretensions to infalli- bility, from having it in its power to do so. Luther's situation at this time was such as would have filled any other person with the most disquieting apprehensions. He could not expect that a prince so prudent and cautious as Frederic would on his account set at defiance the thunders of the Church, and brave the papal power, which had crushed some of the most powerful of the German emperors. He knew what veneration was paid, in that age, to ecclesiastical de- cisions ; what terrors ecclesiastical censures carried along with them, and how easily these might intimi date and shake a prince who was rather his protector from policy than his disciple from conviction. If he should be obliged to quit Saxony, he had no prospect of any other asylum, and must stand exposed to whatever punishment the rage or bigotry of his enemies could inflict. Though sensible of his danger, he discovered no symp- toms of timidity or remissness, but continued to vindicate his own conduct and opinions and to inveigh against those of his adversaries with more vehemence than ever. 22 But as every step taken by the court of Eome, par- ticularly the irregular sentence by which he had been so precipitately declared a heretic, convinced Luther that Leo would soon proceed to the most violent measures against him, he had recourse to the only expedient in J1 Luther., Oper., L 161. ** Seckend., p. 59. BOOK ii.] EMPEROE CHAELES THE FIFTH. 385 his power in order to prevent the effect of the papal censures. He appealed to a general council, which he affirmed to be the representative of the Catholic Church and superior in power to the pope, who, being a fallible man, might err, as St. Peter, the most perfect of his predecessors, had erred. 23 It soon appeared that Luther had not formed rash conjectures concerning the intentions of the Romish Church. A bull of a date prior to his appeal was issued by the pope, in which he magnifies the virtue and efficacy of indulgences, in terms as extravagant as any of his predecessors had ventured to use in the darkest ages; and, without applying such palliatives or men- tioning such concessions as a more enlightened period and the disposition in the minds of many men at that juncture seemed to call for, he required all Christians to assent to what he delivered as the doctrine of the Catholic Church, and subjected those who should hold or teach any contrary opinion to the heaviest ecclesias- tical censures. Among Luther's followers, this bull, which they considered as an unjustifiable effort of the pope in order to preserve that rich branch of his revenue which arose from indulgences, produced little effect. But among the rest of his countrymen, such a clear decision of the sovereign pontiff against him, and enforced by such dreadful penalties, must have been attended with consequences very fatal to his cause, if these had not been prevented in a great measure by the death of the emperor Maximilian, whom both his principles and his interest prompted to support the authority of the holy see. In consequence of this event, the vicariat of that part of Germany which is governed by the Saxon laws devolved to the elector of Saxony ; and under the shelter of his friendly administration Luther not only 23 Sleid., Hist, 12, Luth., Oper , i. 179. vou, i. CO 386 EEION OF THE [BOOK n. * enjoyed tranquillity, but his opinions were suffered, during the interregnum which preceded Charles's elec- tion, to take root in different places and to grow up to some degree of strength and firmness. At the same time, as the election of an emperor was a point more interesting to Leo than a theological controversy, which he did not understand, and of which he could not foresee the consequences, he was so extremely solicitous not to irritate a prince of such considerable influence in the electoral college as Frederic, that he discovered a great unwillingness to pronounce the sentence of excommuni- cation against Luther, which his adversaries continually demanded with the most clamorous importunity. To these political views of the pope, as well as to his natural aversion from severe measures, was owing the suspension of any further proceedings against Luther for eighteen months. Perpetual negotiations, however, in order to bring the matter to some amicable issue, were carried on during that space. The manner in which these were conducted having given Luther many opportunities of observing the corruption of the court of Eome, its obstinacy in adhering to established errors, and its indifference about truth, however clearly pro- posed or strongly proved, he began to utter some doubts with regard to the divine original of the papal authority. A public disputation was held upon this important question at Leipsic, between Luther and Eccius, one of his most learned and formidable antagonists ; but it was as fruitless and indecisive as such scholastic combats usually prove. Both parties boasted of having obtained the victory ; both were confirmed in their own opinions ; and no progress was made towards deciding the point in controversy. 24 Nor did the spirit of opposition to the doctrines and usurpations of the Eomish Church break out in Saxony 24 LutL, Oper.. L 199. BOOK ii.] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH 387 alone : an attack no less violent, and occasioned by the same causes, was made upon them about this time in Switzerland. The Franciscans, being intrusted with the promulgation of indulgences in that country, executed their commission with the same indiscretion and rapa- ciousness which had rendered the Dominicans so odious in Germany. They proceeded, nevertheless, with unin- terrupted success, until they arrived at Zurich. There Zuinglius, a man not inferior to Luther himself in zeal and intrepidity, ventured to oppose them ; and teing animated with a republican boldness, and free rrom those restraints which subjection to the will of a prince imposed on the German Eeformer, he advanced with more daring and rapid steps to overturn the whole fabric of the established religion. 25 The appearance of such a vigorous auxiliary, and the progress which he made, was, at first, matter of great joy to Luther. On the other hand, the decrees of the Universities of Cologne and Louvain, which pronounced his opinions to be erro- neous, afforded great cause of triumph to his adversaries. But the undaunted spirit of Luther acquired additional fortitude from every instance of opposition ; and, pushing on his inquiries and attacks from one doctrine to another, he began to shake the firmest foundations on which the wealth or power of the Church was established. Leo came at last to be convinced that all hopes of reclaiming him by forbearance were vain ; several prelates of great wisdom exclaimed, no less than Luther's personal adver- saries, against the pope's unprecedented lenity in per- mitting an incorrigible heretic, who during three years had been endeavouring to subvert everything sacred, and venerable, still to remain within the bosom of the Church ; the dignity of the papal see rendered the most vigorous proceedings necessary ; the new emperor, it was hoped, would support its authority ; nor did it seem SleicL, Hist, 22. Seckend., 59. o o 2 388 EEIGN OF THE [BOOK n. probable that the elector of Saxony would so far forget his usual caution as to set himself in opposition to their united power. The college of cardinals was often assem- bled, in order to prepare the sentence with due delibera- tion, and the ablest canonists were consulted how it might be expressed with unexceptionable formality. At last, on the 15th of June, 1520, the bull, so fatal to the Church of Eome, was issued. Forty-one propositions, extracted out of Luther's works, are therein condemned as heretical, scandalous, and offensive to pious ears ; all persons are forbidden to read his writings upon pain of excommunication ; such as had any of them in their custody were commanded to commit them to the flames ; he himself, if he did not within sixty days publicly recant his errors and burn his books, is pronounced an obstinate heretic, is excommunicated, and delivered unto Satan for the destruction of his flesh; and all secular princes are required, under pain of incurring the same censure, to seize his person, that he might be punished as his crimes deserved. 26 The publication of this bull in Germany excited various passions in different places. Luther's adversaries exulted, as if his party and opinions had been crushed at once by such a decisive blow. His followers, whose reverence for the papal authority daily diminished, read Leo's anathemas with more indignation than terror. In some cities the people violently obstructed the promulga- tion of the bull ; in others, the persons who attempted to publish it were insulted, and the bull itself was torn in pieces and trodden under foot. 27 This sentence, which he had for some time expected, did not disconcert or intimidate Luther. After renewing his appeal to the general council, he published remarks upon the bull of excommunication ; and, being now * Pallav., 27. Lutk, Oper., i. 423. 27 Seckend., p. 1J6. HOOK n.J EMPEROE CHARLES THE FIFTH. 389 persuaded that Leo had been guilty both of impiety and injustice in his proceedings against him, he boldly de- clared the pope to be that man of sin, or Antichrist, whose appearance is foretold in the New Testament ; he declaimed against his tyranny and usurpations with greater violence than ever; he exhorted all Christian princes to shake off such an ignominious yoke, and boasted of his own happiness in being marked out as the object of ecclesiastical indignation, because he had ventured to assert the liberty of mankind. Nor did he confine his expressions of contempt for the papal power to words alone : Leo having, in execution of the bull, appointed Luther's books to be burnt at Eome, he, by way of retaliation, assembled all the professors and students in the University of Wittemberg, and with great pomp, in presence of a vast multitude of specta- tors, cast the volumes of the canon law, together with the bull of excommunication, into the flames ; and his example was imitated in several cities of Germany. The manner in which he justified this action was still more offensive than the action itself. Having collected from the canon law some of the most extravagant propositions with regard to the plenitude and omnipotence of the papal power, as well as the subordination of all secular jurisdiction to the authority of the holy see, he published these with a commentary, pointing out the impiety of such tenets and their evident tendency to subvert all civil government. 28 Such was the progress which Luther had made, and such the state of his party, when Charles arrived in Germany. No secular prince had hitherto embraced Luther's opinions ; no change in the established forms of worship had been introduced ; and no encroachments had been made upon the possessions or jurisdiction of the clergy ; neither party had yet proceeded to action ; 88 Lutk, Oper., ii 316. 390 EEIGN OF THE [BOOK n. and the controversy, though conducted with great heat and passion on both sides, was still carried on with its proper weapons, with theses, disputations, and replies. A deep impression, however, was made upon the minds of the people ; their reverence for ancient institutions and doctrines was shaken ; and the materials were already scattered which kindled into the combustion that soon spread over all Germany. Students crowded from every province of the empire to Wittemberg ; and under Luther himself, Melancthon, Carlostadius, and other masters then reckoned eminent, imbibed opinions which, on their return, they propagated among their country- men, who listened to them with that fond attention which truth, when accompanied with novelty, naturally commands. 29 During the course of these transactions the court of Borne, though under the direction of one of its ablest pontiffs, neither formed its schemes with that profound sagacity nor executed them with that steady perse- verance which had long rendered it the most perfect model of political wisdom to the rest of Europe. When Luther began to declaim against indulgences, two differ- ent methods of treating him lay before the pope, by adopting one of which the attempt, it is probable, might have been crushed, and by the other it might have been rendered innocent. If Luther's first departure from the doctrines of the Church had instantly drawn upon him the weight of its censures, the dread of these might have restrained the elector of Saxony from protecting him, might have deterred the people from listening to his discourses, or even might have overawed Luther him- self ; and his name, like that of many good men before his time, would now have been known to the world only for his honest but ill-timed effort to correct the corrup- tions of the Eomish Church. On the other hand, if the 29 Seckend., 59. BOOK n.] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. pope had early testified some displeasure with the vices and excesses of the friars who had been employed in publishing indulgences, if he had forbidden the men- tioning of controverted points in discourses addressed to the people, if he had enjoined the disputants on both sides to be silent, if he had been careful not to risk the credit of the Church by defining articles which had hitherto been left undetermined, Luther would probably have stopped short at his first discoveries : he would not have been forced, in self-defence, to venture upon new ground, and the whole controversy might possibly have died away insensibly, or, being confined entirely to the schools, might have been carried on with as little detri- ment to the peace and unity of the Romish Church as that which the Franciscans maintained with the Do- minicans concerning the immaculate conception, or that between the Jansenists and Jesuits concerning the opera- tions of grace. But Leo, by fluctuating between these opposite systems, and by embracing them alternately, defeated the effects of both. By an improper exertion of authority, Luther was exasperated, but not restrained. By a mistaken exercise of lenity, time was given for his opinions to spread, but no progress was made towards reconciling him to the Church ; and even the sentence of excommunication, which at another juncture might have been decisive, was delayed so long that it became at last scarcely an object of terror. Such a series of errors in the measures of a court seldom chargeable with mistaking its own true interest is not more astonishing than the wisdom which appeared in Luther's conduct. Though a perfect stranger to the maxims of worldly wisdom, and incapable, from the impetuosity of his temper, of observing them, he was led naturally, by the method in which he made his discoveries, to carry on his operations in a manner which contributed more to their success than if every 392 EEIGN OF THE [BOOK n. step he took had been prescribed by the most artful policy. At the time when he set himself to oppose Tetzel, he was far from intending that reformation which he afterwards effected, and would have trembled with horror at the thoughts of what at last he gloried in accomplishing. The knowledge of truth was not poured into his mind all at once by any special revelation ; he acquired it by industry and meditation, and his progress, of consequence, was gradual. The doctrines of popery are so closely connected that the exposing of one error conducted him naturally to the detection of others ; and all the parts of that artificial fabric were so united together that the pulling down of one loosened the foundation of the rest and rendered it more easy to over- turn them. In confuting the extravagant tenets con- cerning indulgences, he was obliged to inquire into the true cause of our justification and acceptance with God. The knowledge of that discovered to him by degrees the inutility of pilgrimages and penances ; the vanity of relying on the intercession of saints ; the impiety of worshipping them ; the abuses of auricular confession ; and the imaginary existence of purgatory. The detec- tion of so many errors led him, of course, to consider the character of the clergy who taught them ; and their exorbitant wealth, the severe injunction of celibacy, together with the intolerable rigour of monastic vows, appeared to him the great sources of their corruption. From thence it was but one step to call in question the divine original of the papal power, which authorized and supported such a system of errors. As the unavoid- able result of the whole, he disclaimed the infallibility of the pope, the decisions of schoolmen, or any other human authority, and appealed to the word of God as the only standard of theological truth. To this gradual progress Luther owed his success. His hearers were not shocked at first by any proposition too repugnant BOOK ii.] EMPEROB CHARLES THE FIFTH. 398 to their ancient prejudices or too remote from estab- lished opinions. They were conducted insensibly from one doctrine to another. Their faith and conviction were able to keep pace with his discoveries. To the same cause was owing the inattention, and even indiffer- ence, with which Leo viewed Luther's first proceedings. A direct or violent attack upon the authority of the Church would at once have drawn upon Luther the whole weight of its vengeance ; but as this was far from his thoughts, as he continued long to profess great respect for the pope, and made repeated offers of sub- mission to his decisions, there seemed to be no reason for apprehending that he would prove the author of any desperate revolt ; and he was suffered to proceed, step by step, in undermining the constitution of the Church, until the remedy applied at last came too late to produce any effect. But whatever advantages Luther's cause derived, either from the mistakes of his adversaries or from his own good conduct, the sudden progress and firm estab- lishment of his doctrines must not be ascribed to these alone. The same corruptions in the Church of Rome which he condemned had been attacked long before his time. The same opinions which he now propagated had been published in different places, and were sup- ported by the same arguments. Waldus in the twelfth century, Wickliff in the fourteenth, and Huss in the fifteenth, had inveighed against the errors of popery with great boldness, and confuted them with more inge- nuity and learning than could have been expected in those illiterate ages in which they flourished. But all these premature attempts towards a reformation proved abortive. Such feeble lights, incapable of dispelling the darkness which then covered the Church, were soon extinguished ; and though the doctrines of these pious men produced some effects and left some traces in the 394 REIGN OF THE [BOOK 11. countries where they taught, they were neither extensive nor considerable. Many powerful causes contributed to facilitate Luther's progress, which either did not exist, or did not operate with full force, in their days ; and at that critical and mature juncture when he appeared, circumstances of every kind concurred in rendering each step that he took successful. The long and scandalous schism which divided the Church during the latter part of the fourteenth and the beginning of the fifteenth centuries had a great effect in diminishing the veneration with which the world had been accustomed to -view the papal dignity. Two or three contending pontiffs roaming about Europe at a time, fawning on the princes whom they wanted to gain, extorting large sums of money from the countries which acknowledged their authority, excommunicating their rivals, and cursing those who adhered to them, dis- credited their pretensions to infallibility and exposed both their persons and their office to contempt. The laity, to whom all parties appealed, came to learn that some right of private judgment belonged to them, and acquired the exercise of it so far as to choose, among these infallible guides, whom they would please to follow. The proceedings of the councils of Constance and Basil spread this disrespect for the Romish see still wider, and, by their bold exertion of authority in deposing and electing popes, taught men that there was in the Church a jurisdiction superior even to the papal power, which they had long believed to be supreme. The wound given on that occasion to the papal autho- rity was scarcely healed up when the pontificates of Alexander VI. and Julius II., both able princes, but detestable ecclesiastics, raised new scandal in Christen- dom. The profligate morals of the former in private life, the fraud, the injustice, and cruelty of his public administration, place him on a level with those tyrants n.] EMPEROR CHAELES THE FIFTH. 395 whose deeds are the greatest reproach to human nature. The latter, though a stranger to the odious passions which prompted his predecessor to commit so many unnatural crimes, was under the dominion of a restless and ungovernable ambition, that scorned all considera- tions of gratitude, of decency, or of justice, when they obstructed the execution of his schemes. It was hardly possible to be firmly persuaded that the infallible know- ledge of a religion whose chief precepts are purity and humility was deposited in the breasts of the profligate Alexander or the overbearing Julius. The opinion of those who exalted the authority of a council above that of the pope spread wonderfully under their pontificates ; and as the emperor and French kings, who were alter- nately engaged in hostilities with those active pontiffs, permitted and even encouraged their subjects to expose their vices with all the violence of invective and all the petulance of ridicule, men's ears being accustomed to these were not shocked with the bold or ludicrous dis- courses of Luther and his followers concerning the papal dignity. Nor were such excesses confined to the head of the Church alone. Many of the dignified clergy, secular as well as regular, being the younger sons of noble families, who had assumed the ecclesiastical character for no other reason but that they found in the Church stations of great dignity and affluence, were accustomed totally to neglect the duties of their office, and indulged themselves without reserve in all the vices to which great wealth and idleness naturally give birth. Though the inferior clergy were prevented by their poverty from imitating the expensive luxury of their superiors, yet gross ignorance and low debauchery rendered them as contemptible as the others were odious. 30 The severe 30 The corrupt state of the Church ledged by an author who was both prior to the Reformation is acknow- abundantly able to judge concerning 396 REIGN OF THE [BOOK it and unnatural law of celibacy, to which both were equally subject, occasioned such irregularities that u several parts of Europe the concubinage of priests was not only permitted, but enjoined. The employing of a remedy so contrary to the precepts of the Christian religion is the strongest proof that the crimes it was intended to prevent were both numerous and flagrant. Long before the sixteenth century, many authors of great name and authority give such descriptions of the dissolute morals of the clergy as seem almost incredible in the present age. 31 The voluptuous lives of ecclesias- tics occasioned great scandal, not only because their this matter and who was not over- forward to confess it. " For some years," says Bellarmine, " before the Lutheran and Calvinistic here- sies were published, there was not (as contemporary authors testify) any severity in ecclesiastical judica- tories, any discipline with regard to morals, any knowledge of sacred literature, any reverence for divine things : there was not almost any religion remaining." Bellarminus, Concio xxviii., Oper., torn. vi. col. 296, edit. Colon., 1617, apud Ger- desii Hist. Evan. Eenovati, vol. i. p. 25. 31 Centum Gravamina Nation. German, in Fascicule Eer. expetend. et fugiendarum, per Ortuinum Gra- tium, vol. L p. 361. See innumer- able passages to the same purpose in the Appendix, or second volume, published by Edw. Brown. See also Herm. von der Hardt, Hist. Lit. Reform., pars, iii, and the vast collections of Wai chins in his four volumes of Monumenta Medii Mvi, Getting., 1757. The authors I have quoted enumerate the vices of the clergy. When they ventured upon actions manifestly criminal, we may conclude that they would be less scrupulous with respect to the decorum of behaviour. Ac- cordingly, their neglect of the decent conduct suitable to their profession seems to have given great offence. In order to illustrate this, I shall transcribe one passage, because it is not taken from any author whose professed purpose it was to de- scribe the improper conduct of the clergy, and who, from prejudice or artifice, may be supposed to aggra- vate the charge against them. The emperor Charles IV., in a letter to the archbishop of Mentz, A.D. 1359, exhorting him to reform the dis- orders of the clergy, thus expresses himself : " De Christi patrimonio, ludos, hastiludia et torneamenta exercent ; habitum militarem cum praetextis aureis et argenteis gestant, et calceos militares ; comam et barbam nutriunt, et nihil quod aJ. vitam et ordinem ecclesiasticum spectat, ostendunt. Militaribus se duntaxat et secularibus actibus, vita et moribus, in suse salutis dis- pendiuin, et generale populi scanda- lum, immiscent." Codex Diploma- ticus Anecdotoruin, per Val. Ferd Gudenum, 4to, voL iii. p. 438 BOOK n.] EMPEEOE CHARLES THE FIFTH. 397 manners were inconsistent with their sacred character, but the laity, being accustomed to see several of them raised from the lowest stations to the greatest affluence, did not show the same indulgence to their excesses as to those of persons possessed of hereditary wealth or grandeur ; and, viewing their condition with more envy, they censured their crimes with greater severity. Nothing, therefore, could be more acceptable to Luther's hearers than the violence with which he exclaimed against the immoralities of churchmen ; and every per- son in his audience could, from his own observation, confirm the truth of his invectives. The scandal of these crimes was greatly increased by the facility with which such as committed them obtained pardon. In all the European kingdoms, the importance of the civil magistrate, under forms of government ex- tremely irregular and turbulent, made it necessary to relax the rigour of justice; and, upon payment of a certain fine or composition prescribed by law, judges were accustomed to remit further punishment, even of the most atrocious crimes. The court of Rome, always attentive to the means of augmenting its revenues, imitated this practice, and, by a preposterous accom- modation of it to religious concerns, granted its pardons to such transgressors as gave a sum of money in order to purchase them. As the idea of a composition for crimes was then familiar, this strange traffic was so far from shocking mankind, that it soon became general ; and, in order to prevent any imposition in carrying it on, the officers of the Roman chancery published a book containing the precise sum to be exacted for the pardon of every particular sin. A deacon guilty of murder was absolved for twenty crowns. A bishop, or abbot, might assassinate for three hundred livres. Any ecclesi- astic might violate his vows of chastity, even with the most aggravating circumstances, for the third part of 398 EEIGN OF THE [BOOK n. that sum. Even such shocking crimes as occur seldom in human life, and perhaps exist only in the impure imagination of a casuist, were taxed at a very moderate rate. When a more regular and perfect mode of dis- pensing justice came to be introduced into civil courts, the practice of paying a composition for crimes went gradually into disuse; and, mankind having acquired more accurate notions concerning religion and morality, the conditions on which the courts of Home bestowed its pardons appeared impious, and were considered as one great source of ecclesiastical corruption. 32 This degeneracy of manners among the clergy might have been tolerated, perhaps, with greater indulgence, if their exorbitant riches and power had not enabled them at the same time to encroach on the rights of every other order of men. It is the genius of super- stition, fond of whatever is pompous or grand, to set no bounds to its liberality towards persons whom it esteems sacred, and to think its expressions of regard defective unless it hath raised them to the height of wealth and authority. Hence flowed the extensive revenues and jurisdiction possessed by the Church in every country in Europe, and which were become intolerable to the laity, from whose undiscerning bounty they were at first derived. The burden, however, of ecclesiastical oppression had fallen with such peculiar weight on the Germans as rendered them, though naturally exempt from levity and tenacious of their ancient customs, more inclinable than any people in Europe to listen to those who called on them to assert their liberty. During the long con- tests between the popes and the emperors concerning 32 FascicuL Rer. expet et fug., L Banck et Tuppius. Texa Cancel 355. J. G. Schelhornii Amoenit. Romanae, edit. Francof., 1651, pas- Literar. Francof., 1725, voL ii. p. sim. 369. Diction, de Bayle, artic. BOOK it,] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 399 the right of investiture, and the wars which these occa- sioned, most of the considerable German ecclesiastics joined the papal faction ; and while engaged in rebellion against the head of the empire, they seized the imperial domains and revenues and usurped the imperial juris- diction within their own dioceses. Upon the re-esta- blishment of tranquillity, they still retained these usur- pations ; as if by the length of an unjust possession they had acquired a legal right to them. The emperors, too feeble to wrest them out of their hands, were obliged to grant the clergy fiefs of those ample territories; and they enjoyed all the immunities, as well as honours, which belonged to feudal barons. By means of these, many bishops and abbots in Germany were not only ecclesiastics, but princes ; and their character and man- ners partook more of the license too frequent amoug the latter, than of the sanctity which became the former. 33 The unsettled state of government in Germany, and the frequent wars to which that country was exposed, contributed in another manner towards aggrandizing ecclesiastics. The only property, during those times of anarchy, which enjoyed security from the oppression of the great, or the ravages of war, was that which belonged to the Church. This was owing not only to the great reverence for the sacred character prevalent in those ages, but to a superstitious dread of the sentence of excommunication, which the clergy were ready to denounce against all who invaded their possessions. Many, observing this, made a surrender of their lands to ecclesiastics, and, consenting to hold them in fee of the Church, obtained, as its vassals, a degree of safety which without this device they were unable to procure. By such an increase of the number ot* their vassals, the power of ecclesiastics received a real and permanent " F, Paul, History of Ecclesiastical Benefices, p. 107 400 EEIGN OF THE [BOOK 11. -augmentation ; and, as lands held in fee by the limited tenures common in those ages of tea returned to the persons on whom the fief depended, considerable addi- tions were made in this way to the property of the clergy. 34 The solicitude of the clergy in providing for the safety of their own persons was still greater than that which they displayed in securing their possessions ; and their efforts to attain it were still more successful. As they were consecrated to the priestly office with much outward solemnity, were distinguished from the rest of mankind by a peculiar garb and manner of life, and arrogated to their order many privileges which do not belong to other Christians, they naturally became the objects of excessive veneration. As a superstitious spirit spread, they were regarded as beings of a supe- rior species to the profane laity, whom it would be impious to try by the same laws or to subject to the same punishments. This exemption from civil juris- diction, granted at first to ecclesiastics as a mark of respect, they soon claimed as a j oint of right. This valuable immunity of the priesthood is asserted not only in the decrees of popes and councils, but was con- firmed in the most ample form by many of the greatest emperors. 35 As long as the clerical character remained, the person of an ecclesiastic was in some degree sacred ; and unless he were degraded from his office the un- hallowed hand of the civil judge durst not touch him. But, as the power of degradation was lodged in the spiritual courts, the difficulty and expense of obtaining such a sentence too often secured absolute impunity to offenders. Many assumed the clerical character for no other reason than that it might screen them from 34 F. Paul, Hist of Eccles. Benef.. 35 Goldasti Const! tut. Imperial., p. 66. Boulainvilliers, Etat de Francof., 1673, voL ii pp. 92, France, torn. i. p. 169, Lond., 1737, 107. BOOK ii.] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 401 the punishment which their actions deserved. 36 The German nobles complained loudly that these anointed malefactors, as they called them, 37 seldom suffered capi- tally, even for the most atrocious crimes ; and their independence of the civil magistrate is often mentioned in the remonstrances of the diets, as a privilege equally pernicious to society and to the morals of the clergy. While the clergy asserted the privileges of their own order with so much zeal, they made continual encroach- ments upon those of the laity. All causes relative to matrimony, to testaments, to usury, to legitimacy of birth, as well as those which concerned ecclesiastical revenues, were thought to be so connected with religion that they could be tried only in the spiritual courts. Not satisfied with this ample jurisdiction, which ex- tended to one-half of the subjects that gave rise to litigation among men, the clergy, with wonderful in- dustry, and by a thousand inventions, endeavoured to draw all other causes into their own courts. 38 As they had engrossed almost the whole learning known in the Dark Ages, the spiritual judges were commonly so far superior in knowledge and abilities to those employed in the secular courts that the people at first favoured any stretch that was made to bring their affairs under he cognizance of a judicature on the decisions of which they could rely with more perfect confidence than on those of the civil courts. Thus, the interest of the Church and the inclination of the people, concurring to elude the jurisdiction of the lay-magistrate, soon reduced it almost to nothing. 39 By means of this, vast power accrued to ecclesiastics, and no inconsiderable addition was made to their revenue by the sums paid in those ages to the persons who administered justice. ** Rymer's Fcedera, voL xiii p. 3S Giannone, History of Naples, 532. book xix. 3. 37 Centum Gravam., 31 3a Centum Gravam., 9, 56, 64, VOL. 1. D D 402 REIGN OF ME TBOOK it. The penalty by which the spiritual courts enforced their sentences added great weight and terror to their jurisdiction. The censure of excommunication was instituted originally for preserving the purity of the 'Church ; that obstinate offenders, whose impious tenets or profane lives were a reproach to Christianity, might be cut 'off from the society of tlie faithful : this, eccle- siastics did not scruple to convert into an engine for promoting their own power, and they inflicted it on the most frivolous occasions. Whoever despised any of their decisions, even concerning civil matters, immediately incurred this dreadful censure, which not only excluded them from all the privileges of a Christian, but deprived them of their rights as men and citizens ; 40 and the dread of this rendered even the most fierce and tur- bulent spirits obsequious to the authority of the Church. Nor did the clergy neglect the proper methods of preserving the wealth and power which they had ac- quired with such industry and address. The posses- sions of the Church, being consecrated to God, were declared to be unalienable; so that the funds of a society which was daily gaining and could never lose, grew to be immense. In Germany, it was computed that the ecclesiastics had got into their hands more than one-half of the national property. 41 In other countries the proportion varied; but the share belonging to the Church was everywhere prodigious. These vast pos- sessions were not subject to the burdens imposed on the lands of the laity. The German clergy were ex- empted by law from all taxes ; 42 and if, on an extra- ordinary emergence, ecclesiastics were pleased to grant some aid towards supplying the public exigencies, this was considered as a free gift flowing from their own 40 Centum Gravam., 34. per., ii 79, 108. Pfeffel, Hist du 41 Ibid., 28. Droit Pub]., 350, 374. a Id., ibid Goldasti Const Iin- BOOK ii.) EMPEEOE CHAELES THE FIFTH. 403 generosity, which the civil magistrate had no title to demand, far less to exact. In consequence of this strange solecism in government, the laity in Germany had the mortification to find themselves loaded with excessive impositions, because such as possessed the greatest property were freed from any obligation to support or defend the state. Grievous, however, as the exorbitant wealth and numerous privileges of the clerical order were to the other members of the Germanic body, they would have reckoned it some mitigation of the evil if these had been possessed only by ecclesiastics residing among them- selves, who would have been less apt to make an im- proper use of their riches or to exercise their rights with unbecoming rigour. But the bishops of Rome having early put in a claim, the boldest that ever human ambition suggested, of being supreme and in- fallible heads of the Christian Church, they, by their profound policy and unwearied perseverance, by their address in availing themselves of every circumstance which occurred, by taking advantage of the superstitiou of some princes, of the necessities of others, and of the credulity of the people, at length established their pre- tensions, in opposition both to the interest and common sense of mankind. Germany was the country which these ecclesiastical sovereigns governed with most absolute authority. They excommunicated and deposed some of its most illustrious emperors, and excited their subjects, their ministers, and even their children, to take arms against them. Amidst these contests, the popes continually extended their own immunities, spoil- ing the secular princes gradually of their most valuable prerogatives ; and the German Church felt all the rigour of that oppression which flows from subjection to foreign dominion and foreign exactions. The right of conferring benefices, which the popes DD 2 404 EEIGN OF THE [BOOK n. usurped during that period of confusion, was an acquisi- tion of great importance, and exalted the ecclesiastical power upon the ruins of the temporal. The emperors and other princes of Germany had long been in posses- sion of this right, which served to increase both their authority and their revenue ; but by wresting it out of their hands the popes were enabled to fill the empire with their own creatures ; they accustomed a great body of every prince's subjects to depend, not upon him, but upon the Eoman see ; they bestowed upon strangers the richest benefices in every country, and drained their wealth to supply the luxury of a foreign court. Even the patience of the most superstitious ages could no longer bear such oppression ; and so loud and frequent were the complaints and murmurs of the Germans that the popes, afraid of irritating them too far, consented, contrary to their usual practice, to abate somewhat of their pretensions, and to rest satisfied with the right of nomination to such benefices as happened to fall vacant during six months in the year, leaving the dis- posal of the remainder to the princes and other legal patrons. 48 But the court of Eome easily found expedients for eluding an agreement which put such restraints on its power. The practice of reserving certain benefices in every country to the pope's immediate nomination, which had been long known, and often complained of, was extended far beyond its ancient bounds. All the benefices possessed by cardinals or any of the numer- ous officers in the Eoman court, those held by persons who happened to die at Rome, or within forty miles of that city on their journey to or from it, such as became vacant by translation, with many others, were included in the number of reserved benefices. Julius II. and * F. Paul, Hist of Eccles. Benef., 204. Gold., Constit Imper., i 408. BOOK n.] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 405 Leo X., stretching the matter to the utmost, often col- lated to benefices where the right of reservation had not been declared, on pretence of having mentally reserved this privilege to themselves. The right of reservation, however, even with this extension, had certain limits, as it could be exercised only where the benefice was actually vacant ; and therefore, in order to render the exertion of papal power unbounded, expectative graces, or mandates nominating a person to succeed to a benefice upon the first vacancy that should happen, were brought into use. By means of these, Germany was filled with persons who were servilely dependent on the court of Eome, from which they had received such reversionary grants ; princes were defrauded, in a great degree, of their pre- rogatives ; the rights of lay-patrons were preoccupied, and rendered almost entirely vain. 44 The manner in which these extraordinary powers were exercised rendered them still more odious and intolerable. The avarice and extortion of the court of Eome were become excessive, almost to a proverb. The practice of selling benefices was so notorious that no pains were taken to conceal or to disguise it. Com- panies of merchants openly purchased the benefices of different districts in Germany from the pope's minis- ters, and retailed them at an advanced price. 45 Pious men beheld with deep regret these simoniacal transac- tions, so unworthy the ministers of a Christian Church ; while politicians complained of the loss sustained by the exportation of so much wealth in that irreligious traffic. The sums, indeed, which the court of Eome drew by its stated and legal impositions from all the coun- tries acknowledging its authority were so considerable 44 Centum Gravam., 21. Fas- F. Paul, Hist, of EccL Benet, 167, cic. Rer. expet., etc., 334. Gold., 199. Const. Iniper., i. 391, 404, 405. 45 Fascic. Rer. expet., i. 35ft, 406 EEIGN OF THE [BOOK n. that it is not strange that princes, as well as their sub- jects, murmured at the smallest addition made to them by unnecessary or illicit means. Every ecclesiastical person, upon his admission to his benefice, paid annats, or one year's produce of his living, to the pope ; and, as that tax was exacted with great rigour, its amount was very great. To this must be added the frequent demands made by the popes of free gifts from the clergy, together with the extraordinary levies of tenths upon ecclesiastical benefices, on pretence of expeditions against the Turks, seldom intended or carried into ex- ecution ; and, from the whole, the vast proportion of the revenues of the Church which flowed continually to Borne may be estimated. Such were the dissolute manners, the exorbitant wealth, the enormous power and privileges, of the clergy before the Eeformation ; such the oppressive rigour of that dominion which the popes had established over the Christian world ; and such the sentiments con- cerning them that prevailed in Germany at the begin- ning of the sixteenth century. Nor has this sketch been copied from the controversial writers of that age, who, in the heat of disputation, may be suspected of having exaggerated the errors or of having misrepre- sented the conduct of that Church which they laboured to overturn : it is formed upon more authentic evidence, upon the memorials and remonstrances of the imperial diets, enumerating the grievances under which the em- pire groaned, in order to obtain the redress of them. Dissatisfaction must have arisen to a great height among the people, when these grave assemblies expressed them- selves with that degree of acrimony which abounds in their remonstrances ; and if they demanded the aboli- tion of these enormities with so much vehemence, the people, we may be assured, uttered their sentiments and desires in bolder and more virulent language. BOOK ii. j EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 407 To men thus prepared for shaking off the yoke, Luther addressed himself with certainty of success. As they had long felt its weight, and had borne it with impatience, they listened with joy to the first offer of procuring them deliverance. Hence proceeded the fond and eager reception that his doctrines met with, and the rapidity with which they spread over all the provinces of Germany. Even the impetuosity and fierceness of Luther's spirit, his confidence in asserting his own opinions, and the arrogance as well as con- tempt wherewith he treated all them who differed from him, which in ages of greater moderation and refine- ment have been reckoned defects in the character of that Reformer, did not appear excessive to his contem- poraries, whose minds were strongly agitated by those interesting controversies which he carried on, and who had themselves endured the rigour of papal tyranny and seen the corruptions in the Church against which he exclaimed. Nor were they offended at that gross scurrility with which his polemical writings are filled, or at the low buffoonery which he sometimes introduces into his gravest discourses. No dispute was managed in those rude times without a large portion of the former ; and the latter was common, even on the most solemn occa- sions and in treating the most sacred subjects. So far were either of these from doing hurt to his cause that invective and ridicule had some effect, as well as more laudable arguments, in exposing the errors of popery and in determining mankind to abandon them. Besides all these causes of Luther's rapid progress, arising from the nature of his enterprise and the junc- ture at which he undertook it, he reaped advantage from some foreign and adventitious circumstances, the beneficial influence of which none of his forerunners in the same course enjoyed,. Among these may be reckoned 408 EEIGN OF THE ,BOOK n. the invention of the art of printing, about half a century before his time. By this fortunate discovery, the facility of acquiring and of propagating knowledge was won- derfully increased ; and Luther's books, which must otherwise have made their way slowly and with uncer- tainty into distant countries, spread out at once all over Europe. Nor were they read only by the rich and the learned, who alone had access to books before that invention : they got into the hands of the people, who, upon this appeal to them as judges, ventured to examine and to reject many doctrines which they had formerly been required to believe without being taught to understand them. The revival of learning at the same period was a cir- cumstance extremely friendly to the Reformation. The study of the ancient Greek and Roman authors, by en- lightening the human mind with liberal and sound knowledge, roused it from that profound lethargy in which it had been sunk during several centuries. Man- kind seem, at that period, to have recovered the powers of inquiring and of thinking for themselves, faculties of which they had long lost the use ; and, fond of the acquisition, they exercised them with great boldness upon all subjects. They were not now afraid of enter- ing an uncommon path or of embracing a new opinion. Novelty appears rather to have been a recommendation of a doctrine ; and, instead of being startled when the daring hand of Luther drew aside or tore the veil which covered and established errors, the genius of the age applauded and aided the attempt. Luther, though a stranger to elegance in taste or composition, zealously promoted the cultivation of ancient literature ; and, sensible of its being necessary to the right understand- ing of the Scriptures, he himself had acquired con- siderable knowledge both in the Hebrew and Greek tongues. Melancthon, and some other of his disci- BOOK ii.] EMPEUOR, CHARLES THE FIFTH. 409 pies, were eminent proficients in the polite arts ; and, as the same ignorant monks who opposed the intro- duction of learning into Germany set themselves with equal fierceness against Luther's opinions, and declared the good reception of the latter to be the effect of the progress which the former had made, the cause of learning and of the Reformation came to be considered as closely connected with each other, and, in every country, had the same friends and the same enemies. This enabled the Reformers to carry on the contest at first with great superiority. Erudition, industry, accuracy of sentiment, purity of composition, even wit and raillery, were almost wholly on their side, and triumphed with ease over illiterate monks, whose rude arguments, expressed in a perplexed and barbarous style, were found insufficient for the defence of a sys- tem the errors of which all the art and ingenuity of its later and more learned advocates have not been able to palliate. That bold spirit of inquiry, which the revival of learning excited in Europe, was so favourable to the Reformation that Luther was aided in his progress, and mankind were prepared to embrace his doctrines, by persons who did not wish success to his undertaking. The greater part of the ingenious men who applied to the study of ancient literature towards the close of the fifteenth century and the beginning of the sixteenth, though they had no intention, and perhaps no wish, to overturn the established system of religion, had discovered the absurdity of many tenets and practices authorized by the Church, and perceived the futility of those arguments by which illiterate monks endeavoured to defend them. Their contempt of these advocates for the received errors led them frequently to expose the opinions which they supported, and to ridicule their ignorance with great freedom and severity. By this, 410 REIGN OF THE [BOOK IL men were prepared for the more serious attacks made upon them by Luther ; and their reverence both for the doctrines and persons against whom he inveighed was considerably abated. This was particularly the case in Germany. When the first attempts were made to revive a taste for ancient learning in that country, the ecclesiastics there, who were still more ignorant than their brethren on the other side of the Alps, set them- selves to oppose its progress with more active zeal ; and the patrons of the new studies, in return, attacked them with greater violence. In the writings of Eeuchlin, Hutten, and the other revivers of learning in Germany, the corruptions of the Church of Rome are censured with an acrimony of style little inferior to that of Luther himself. 46 From the same cause proceeded the frequent stric- tures of Erasmus upon the errors of the Church, as well as upon the ignorance and vices of the clergy. His reputation and authority were so high in Europe at the beginning of the sixteenth century, and his works were read with such universal admiration, that the effect of these deserves to be mentioned as one of the circumstances which contributed considerably towards Luther's success. Erasmus, having been de- stined for the Church and trained up in the knowledge of ecclesiastical literature, applied himself more to theological inquiries than any of the revivers of learn- ing in that age. His acute judgment and extensive erudition enabled him to discover many errors both in the doctrine and worship of the Eomish Church. Some of these he confuted with great solidity of reasoning and force of eloquence. Others he treated as objects of ridicule, and turned against them that irresistible 4s through their territories, formed a scheme of attacking the kingdom of Naples, hoping either to overrun that country, which was left altogether without defence, or that at least such an unexpected invasion would oblige the viceroy to recall part of the imperial army out of the Milanese. For this purpose he ordered six thousand men to march under the command of John Stuart, duke of Albany. But Pescara, foreseeing that the effect of this diversion would depend entirely upon the operations of the armies in the Milanese, persuaded Lannoy to dis- regard Albany's motions 12 and to bend his whole force against the king himself ; so that Francis not only weakened his army very unseasonably by this great de- tachment, but incurred the reproach of engaging too rashly in chimerical and extravagant projects. By this time the garrison of Pavia was reduced to extremity ; their ammunition and provisions began to fail ; the Germans, of whom it was chiefly composed, having received no pay for seven months, 13 threatened to deliver the town into the enemy's hands, and could hardly be restrained from mutiny by all Leyva's address and authority. The imperial generals, who were no strangers to his situation, saw the necessity of marching 11 Guic., lib. xv. 282, 285. ls Gold., Polit. Imperial, 875. 12 Ibid., p. 285. BOOK iv.] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 513 without loss of time to his relief. This they had now in their power : twelve thousand Germans, whom the zeal and activity of Bourbon taught to move with unusual rapidity, had entered Lombardy under his command, and rendered the imperial army nearly equal to that of the French, greatly diminished by the absence of the body under Albany, as well as by the fatigues of the siege and the rigour of the season. But the more their troops increased in number, the. more .sensibly did the imperialists feel the distress arising from want of money. Far from having funds for paying a powerful army, they had scarcely what was sufficient for defraying the charges of conducting their artillery and of carrying their ammunition and provisions. The abilities of the generals, however, supplied every defect. By their own example, as well as by magnificent promises in the name of the emperor, they prevailed on the troops of all the different nations which composed their army to take the field without pay ; they engaged to lead them directly towards the enemy, and flattered them with the certain prospect of victory, which would at once enrich them with such royal spoils as would be an ample reward for all their services. The soldiers, sensible that by quitting the army they would forfeit the great arrears due to them, and eager to get possession of the promised treasures, demanded a battle with all the impatience of adventurers who fight only for plunder. 14 The imperial generals, without suffering the ardour of their troops to cool, advanced immediately towards the French camp. On the first intelligence of their approach, Francis called a council of war, to deliberate what course he ought to take. All his officers of greatest experience were unanimous in advising him to retire, and to decline a battle with an enemy who courted it 14 Eryci Peuteani Hist Cisalpina, ap. Graavii Thes. Antiquit Ital., iii. 1170, 1179. VIM. I. L It 514 EEIGN OF THE: [BOOK iv. from despair. The imperialists, they observed, would either be obliged in a few weeks to disband an army which they were unable to pay, and which they kept together only by the hope of plunder, or the soldiers, enraged at the non-performance of the promises to which they had trusted, would rise in some furious mutiny, which would allow their generals to think of nothing but their own safety ; that, meanwhile, he might encamp in some strong post, and, waiting in safety the arrival of fresh troops from France and Switzerland, might, before the end of spring, take possession of all the Milanese without danger or bloodshed. But in op- position to them, Bonnivet, whose destiny it was to give counsels fatal to France during the whole campaign, represented the ignominy that it would reflect on their sovereign if he should abandon a siege which he had prosecuted so long, or turn his back before an enemy to whom he was still superior in number, and insisted on the necessity of fighting the imperialists rather than relinquish an undertaking on the success of which the king's future fame depended. Unfortunately, Francis's notions of honour were delicate to an excess that bordered on what was romantic. Having often said that he would take Pavia or perish in the attempt, he thought himself bound not to depart from that resolution, and, rather than expose himself to the slightest imputation, he chose to forego all the advantages which were the certain con- sequences of a retreat, and determined to wait for the imperialists before the walls of Pavia. 15 The imperial generals found the French so strongly intrenched that, notwithstanding the powerful motives which urged them on, they hesitated long before they ventured to attack them ; but at last the necessities of the besieged, and the murmurs of their own soldiers, 18 Guic., lib. xv. 291. BOOK iv.] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 615 obliged them to put every thing to hazard. Never did armies engage with greater ardour, or with a higher opinion of the importance of the battle which they were going to fight ; never were troops more strongly animated with emulation, national antipathy, mutual resentment, and all the passions which inspire obstinate bravery. On the one hand, a gallant young monarch, seconded by a generous nobility, and followed by sub- jects to whose natural impetuosity indignation at the opposition which they had encountered added new force, contended for victory and honour. On the other side, troops more completely disciplined, and conducted by generals of greater abilities, fought from necessity, with courage heightened by despair. The imperialists, how- ever, were unable to resist the first efforts of the French valour, and their firmest battalions began to give way. But the fortune of the day was quickly changed. The Swiss in the service of France, unmindful of the reputa- tion of their country for fidelity and martial glory, abandoned their post in a cowardly manner. Leyva, with his garrison, sallied out and attacked the rear of the French, during the heat of the action, with such fury as threw it into confusion ; and Pescara, falling on their cavalry with the imperial horse, among whom he had prudently intermingled a considerable number of Spanish foot, armed with the heavy muskets then in use, broke this formidable body, by an unusual method of attack, against which they were wholly unprovided. The rout became universal ; and resistance ceased in almost every part but where the king was in person, who fought now not for fame or victory, but for safety. Though wounded in several places, and thrown from his horse, which was killed under him, Francis defended himself on foot with an heroic courage. Many of his bravest officers, gathering round him, and endeavouring to save his life at the expense of their own, fell at his feet. 516 BEIGN OF THE [BOOK iv. ^ *Vse was Bonnivet, the author of this great calamity, who alone died unlamented. The king, ex- hausted with fatigue, and scarcely capable of further resistance, was left almost alone, exposed to the fury of some Spanish soldiers, strangers to his rank and enraged at his obstinacy. At that moment came up Pomperant, a French gentleman who had entered together with Bourbon into the emperor's service, and, placing him- self by the side of the monarch against whom he had rebelled, assisted in protecting him from the violence of the soldiers, at the same time beseeching him to sur- render to Bourbon, who was not far distant. Imminent as the danger was which now surrounded Francis, he rejected with indignation the thoughts of an action which would have afforded such matter of triumph to his traitorous subject, and, calling for Lannoy, who happened likewise to be near at hand, gave up his sword to him; which he, kneeling to kiss the king's hand, received with profound respect, and, taking his own sword from his side, presented it to him, saying " that it did not become so great a monarch to remain disarmed in the presence of one of the emperor's subjects." 16 [February 24, 1525.] Ten thousand men fell on this day, one of the most fatal France had ever seen. Among these were many noblemen of the highest distinction, who chose rather to perish than to turn their backs with dishonour. Not a few were taken prisoners, of whom the most illus- trious was Henry d'Albret, the unfortunate king of Navarre. A small body of the rear-guard made it,? escape, under the command of the duke of Alen^on ; the feeble garrison of Milan, on the first news of the defeat, retired, without being pursued, by another road ; 16 Guic., lib. xv. 292. (Euv. de etc. P. Mart. Ep. 805, 810. Brant., vi. 355. Me'm. de Bellay, Ruscelli, Lettere de' Principi, ii. p. p. 90. Sandoval, Hist., i 638, 70. Ulloa, Vitadi C:irl.> V.. >. 98. BOOK iv.] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH 517 and in two weeks after the battle not a Frenchman remained in Italy. Lannoy, though he treated Francis with all the out- ward marks of honour due to his rank and character, guarded him with the utmost attention. He was soli- citous not only to prevent any possibility of his escaping, but afraid that his own troops might seize his person and detain it as the best security for the payment of their arrears. In order to provide against both these dangers, he conducted Francis, the day after the battle, to the strong castle of Pizzichitone, near Cremona, com- mitting him to the custody of Don Ferdinand Alarcon, general of the Spanish infantry, an officer of great bravery and of strict honour, but remarkable for that severe and scrupulous vigilance which such a trust required. Francis, who formed a judgment of the emperor's dispositions by his own, was extremely desirous that Charles should be informed of his situation, fondly hoping that from his generosity or sympathy he should obtain speedy relief. The imperial generals were no less impatient to give their sovereign an early account of the decisive victory which they had gained, and to receive his instructions with regard to their future con- duct. As the most certain and expeditious method of conveying intelligence to Spain, at that season of the year, was by land, Francis gave the Commendador Pennalosa, who was charged with Lannoy's despatches, a passport to travel through France. Charles received the account of this signal and un- expected success that had crowned his arms with a moderation which, if it had been real, would have done him more honour than the greatest victory. Without uttering one word expressive of exultation or of intem- perate joy, he retired immediately into his chapel, and, having spent an hour in offering up his thanksgivings to Heaven, returned to the presence-chamber, which by 518 REIGN OF THE [BOOK r that time was filled with grandees and foreign ambas- sadors, assembled in order to congratulate him. He accepted of their compliments with a modest deport- ment ; he lamented the misfortune of the captive king, as a striking example of the sad reverse of fortune to which the most powerful monarchs are subject ; he for- bade any public rejoicings, as indecent in a war carried on among Christians, reserving them until he should obtain a victory equally illustrious over the infidels ; and seemed to take pleasure in the advantage which he had gained only as it would prove the occasion of restoring peace to Christendom. 17 Charles, however, had already begun to form schemes in his own mind which little suited such external appear- ances. Ambition, not generosity, was the ruling passion in his mind ; and the victory at Pavia opened such new and unbounded prospects of gratifying it as allured him with irresistible force ; but, it being no easy matter to execute the vast designs which he meditated, he thought it necessary, while proper measures were taken for that purpose, to affect the greatest moderation, hoping under that veil to conceal his real intentions from the other princes of Europe. Meanwhile, France was filled with consternation. The king himself had early transmitted an account of the rout at Pavia, in a letter to his mother, delivered by Pennalosa, which contained only these words : " Madam, all is lost, except our honour." The officers who made their escape, when they arrived from Italy, brought such a melancholy detail of particulars as made all ranks of men sensibly feel the greatness and extent of the calamity. France, without its sovereign, without money in her treasury, without an army, without generals to command it, and encompassed on all sides by a victorious and active enemy, seemed to be on the very brink of destruction. 17 Sandoval, Hiat., L 611. Ulloa, Vita di Carlo V., p. 110. BOOK iv.] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 519 But on that occasion the great abilities of Louise the regent saved the kingdom which the violence of her pas- sions had more than once exposed to the greatest danger. Instead of giving herself up to such lamentations as were natural to a woman so remarkable for her maternal ten- derness, she discovered all the foresight and exerted all the activity of a consummate politician. She assembled the nobles at Lyons, and animated them by her example, no less than by her words, with such zeal in defence of their country as its present situation required. She col- lected the remains of the army which had served in Italy, ransomed the prisoners, paid the arrears, and put them in a condition to take the field. She levied new troops, provided for the security of the frontiers, and raised sums sufficient for defraying these extraordinary expenses. Her chief care, however, was to appease the resentment or to gain the friendship of the king of Eng- land ; and from that quarter the first ray of comfort broke in upon the French. Though Henry, in entering into alliances with Charles or Francis, seldom followed any regular or concerted plan of policy, but was influenced chiefly by the caprice of temporary passions, such occurrences often happened as recalled his attention towards that equal balance of power which it was necessary to keep between the two contending potentates, the preservation of which he always boasted to be his peculiar office. He had ex- pected that his union with the emperor might afford him an opportunity of recovering some part of those territories in France which had belonged to his ancestors, and for the Bake of such an acquisition he did not scruple to give his assistance towards raising Charles to a considerable pre- eminence above Francis. He had never dreamt, how- ever, of any event so decisive and so fatal as the victory at Pavia, which seemed not only to have broken, but to have annihilated, the power of one of the rivals ; so that 520 EEIGN OF THE [BOOK iv. the prospect of the sudden and entire revolution which this would occasion in the political system filled him with the most disquieting apprehensions. He saw all Europe in danger of being overrun by an ambitious prince, to whose power there now remained no counterpoise ; and, though he himself might at first be admitted, in quality of an ally, to some share in the spoils of the captive monarch, it was easy to discern that with regard to the manner of making the partition, as well as his security for keeping possession of what should be allotted him, he must absolutely depend upon the will of a con- federate, to whose forces his own bore no proportion. He was sensible that if Charles were permitted to add any considerable part of France to the vast dominions of which he was already master, his neighbourhood would be much more formidable to England than that of the ancient French kings ; while at the same time the proper balance on the Continent, to which England owed both its safety and importance, would be entirely lost. Con- cern for the situation of the unhappy monarch co-ope- rated with these political considerations; his gallant behaviour in the battle of Pavia had excited a high degree of admiration, which never fails of augmenting sympathy ; and Henry, naturally susceptible of generous sentiments, was fond of appearing as the deliverer of a vanquished enemy from a state of captivity. The passions of the English minister seconded the inclinations of the monarch. Wolsey, who had not forgotten the disap- pointment of his hopes in two successive conclaves, which he imputed chiefly to the emperor, thought this a proper opportunity of taking revenge; and Louise courting the friendship of England with such flattering submissions as were no less agreeable to the king than to the cardinal, Henry gave her secret assurances that he would not lend his aid towards oppressing France in its present helpless state, and obliged her to promise that BOOK iv.] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 521 she would not consent to dismember the kingdom, even in order to procure her son's liberty. 18 But, as Henry's connections with the emperor made it necessary to act in such a manner as to save appear- ances, he ordered public rejoicings to be made in his dominions for the success of the imperial arms ; and, as if he had been eager to seize the present opportunity of ruining the French monarchy, he sent ambassadors to Madrid to congratulate with Charles upon his victory, to put him in mind that he, as his ally, engaged in one common cause, was entitled to partake in the fruits of it, and to require that, in compliance with the terms of their confederacy, he would invade Guienne with a powerful army, in order to give him possession of that province. At the same time, he offered to send the princess Mary into Spain or the Low Countries, that she might be educated under the emperor's direction until the conclusion of the marriage agreed on between them ; and in return for that mark of his confidence he insisted that Francis should be delivered to him, in consequence of that article in the treaty of Bruges whereby each of the contracting parties was bound to surrender all usurpers to him whose rights they had invaded. It was impossible that Henry could expect that the em- peror would listen to these extravagant demands, which it was neither his interest nor in his power to grant. They appear evidently to have been made with no other intention than to furnish him with a decent pretext for entering into such engagements with France as the junc- ture required. 19 It was among the Italian states, however, that the victory at Pavia occasioned the greatest alarm and terror. That balance of power on which they relied for their security, and which it had been the constant 18 Mem. de Bellay, 94. Guic., lib. xvt 318. Herbert M Herbert, p 64. 522 EEIGN OF THE [BOOK IT. object of all their negotiations and refinements to maintain, was destroyed in a moment. They were ex- posed, by their situation, to feel the first effects of that uncontrolled authority which Charles had acquired. They observed many symptoms of a boundless ambition in that young prince, and were sensible that, as em- peror, or king of Naples, he might not only form dangerous pretensions upon each of their territories, but might invade them with great advantage. They deliberated, therefore, with much solicitude concerning the means of raising such a force as might obstruct his progress; 20 but their consultations, conducted with little union and executed with less vigour, had no effect. Clement, instead of pursuing the measures which he had concerted with the Venetians for securing the liberty of Italy, was so intimidated by Lannoy's threats, or overcome by his promises, that he entered into a separate treaty, binding himself to advance a consider- able sum to the emperor, in return for certain emolu- ments which he was to receive from him. The money was instantly paid; but Charles afterwards refused to ratify the treaty, and the pope remained exposed at once to infamy and to ridicule : to the former, because he had deserted the public cause for his private interest ; to the latter, because he had been a loser by that un- worthy action. 21 How dishonourable soever the artifice might be which was employed in order to defraud the pope of this sum, it came very seasonably into the viceroy's hands, and put it in his power to extricate himself out of an immi- nent danger. Soon after the defeat of the French army, the German troops, which had defended Pavia with such meritorious courage and perseverance, growing insolent 20 Quic., lib. xvi. 300. Ruscelli, 21 Guic., lib. xvi. 305. Mauro- Lettere de' Princ., ii. 74, 76, etc. ceni Histor. Venet, ap. Istorici Thuani Hist., lib. i. c. 11. delle Cose Venez., v. 131, 136, BOOK iv.] EMPEEOE CHAELES THE FIFTH. 523 upon the fame that they had acquired, and impatient of relying any longer on fruitless promises, with which they had been so often amused, rendered themselves masters of the town, with a resolution to keep posses- sion of it as a security for the payment of their arrears ; and the rest of the army discovered a much stronger inclination to assist than to punish the mutineers. By dividing among them the money exacted from the pope, Lannoy quieted the tumultuous Germans ; but, though this satisfied their present demands, he had so little pros- pect of being able to pay them or his other forces regularly for the future,, and was under such continual apprehensions of their seizing the person of the captive king, that not long after he was obliged to dismiss all the Germans and Italians in the imperial service. 22 Thus, from a circumstance that now appears very singular, but arising naturally from the constitution of most European governments in the sixteenth cen- tury, while Charles was suspected by all his neighbours of aiming at universal monarchy, and while he was really forming vast projects of this kind, his revenues were so limited that he could not keep on foot his vic- torious army, though it did not exceed twenty-four thousand men. During these transactions, Charles, whose pretensions to moderation and disinterestedness were soon forgotten, deliberated with the utmost solicitude how he might derive the greatest advantages from the misfortunes of his adversary. Some of his councillors advised him to treat Francis with the magnanimity that became a victo- rious prince, and, instead of taking advantage of his situation to impose rigorous conditions, to dismiss him on such equal terms as would bind him for ever to his interest by the ties of gratitude and affection, more forcible as well as more permanent than any which 12 Guic., lib. xvi. p. 302. 524 REIGN OF THE [BOOK iv. could be formed by extorted oaths and involuntary stipulations. Such an exertion of generosity is not, perhaps, to be expected in the conduct of political affairs, and it was far too refined for that prince to tvhom it was proposed. The more obvious but less splendid scheme, of endeavouring to make the utmost of Francis's calamity, had a greater number in the council to recommend it, and suited better with the emperor's genius. But, though Charles adopted this plan, he seems not to have executed it in the most proper manner. Instead of making one great effort to penetrate into France with all the forces of Spain and the Low Countries, instead of crushing the Italian states before they recovered from the consternation which the success of his arms had occasioned, he had recourse to the artifices of intrigue and negotiation. This proceeded partly from necessity, partly from the natural disposition of his mind. The situation of his finances at that time rendered it extremely difficult to carry on any extraordinary armament ; and he himself, having never appeared at the head of his armies, the command of which he had hitherto committed to his generals, was averse to bold and martial councils, and trusted more to the arts with which he was acquainted. He laid, besides, too much stress upon the victory of Pavia, as if by that event the strength of France had been annihilated, its resources exhausted, and the king- dom itself, no less than the person of its monarch, had been subjected to his power. Full of this opinion, he determined to set the highest price upon Francis's freedom, and, having ordered the Count dc Kceux to visit the captive king in his name, he instructed him to propose the following articles as the conditions on which he would grant him his liberty : that he should restore Burgundy to the emperor, from whose ancestors it had been unjustly wrested ; that hf BOOK iv.] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 525 should surrender Provence and Dauphine", that they might be erected into an independent kingdom for the Constable Bourbon ; that he should make full satisfac- tion to the king of England for all his claims, and finally renounce the pretensions of France to Naples, Milan, or any other territory in Italy. When Francis, who had hitherto flattered himself that he should be treated by the emperor with the generosity becoming one great prince towards another, heard these rigorous conditions, he was so transported with indignation that, drawing his dagger hastily, he cried out, " 'Twere better that a king should die thus." Alarcon, alarmed at his vehe- mence, laid hold on his hand ; but, though he soon recovered greater composure, he still declared, in the most solemn manner, that he would rather remain a prisoner during life than purchase liberty by such igno- minious concessions. 23 This mortifying discovery of the emperor's intentions greatly augmented Francis's chagrin and impatience under his confinement, and must have driven him to absolute despair, if he had not laid hold of the onlj thing which could still administer any comfort to him. He persuaded himself that the conditions which Eoeux had proposed did not flow originally from Charles him- self, but were dictated by the rigorous policy of his Spanish council, and that therefore he might hope in one personal interview with him to do more towards hastening his own deliverance than could be effected by long negotiations passing through the subordinate hands of his ministers. Relying on this supposition, which proceeded from too favourable an opinion of the emperor's character, he offered to visit him in Spain, and was willing to be carried thither as a spectacle to that haughty nation. Lannoy employed all his address to confirm him in these sentiments, and concerted with 28 M his country transported him beyond all bounds of patience. The French began to fortify Savona, to clear its harbour, and, removing thither some branches of trade carried 16 Guic., lib. xviii. 478. 592 fcEIGN OF THE [BOOK T. on at Genoa, plainly showed that they intended to render that town, which had been long the object of jealousy and hatred to the Genoese, ^heir rival in wealth and commerce. Doria, animated with a patriotic zeal for the honour and interest of his country, re- monstrated against this in the highest tone, not without threats if the measure were not instantly abandoned. This bold action, aggravated by the malice of the courtiers, and placed in the most odious light, irritated Francis to such a degree, that he commanded Barbe- sieux, whom he appointed admiral of the Levant, to sail directly to Genoa with the French fleet, to arrest Doria, and to seize his galleys. This rash order, the execution of which could have been secured only by the most profound secrecy, was concealed with so little care, that Doria got timely intelligence of it, and retired with all his galleys to a place of safety. Guasto, his prisoner, who had long observed and fomented his growing discontent, and had often allured him by magnificent promises to enter into the em- peror's service, laid hold on this favourable opportunity. While Jbi.8 indignation and resentment were at their height, he prevailed on him to despatch one of his officers to the imperial court with his overtures and demands. The negotiation was not long : Charles, fully sensible of the importance of such an acquisition, granted him whatever terms he required. Doria sent back his commission, together with the collar -of St. Michael, to Francis, and, hoisting the imperial colours, sailed with all his galleys towards Naples, not to block up the harbour of that unhappy city, as he had formerly engaged, but to bring them protection and deliverance. His arrival opened the communication with the sea, and restored plenty in Naples, which was now reduced to the last extremity ; and the French, having lost their BOOK V.j EMPEEOE CHARLES THE FIFTH. 593 superiority at sea, were soon reduced to great straits for want of provisions. The prince of Orange, who succeeded the viceroy in the command of the imperial army, showed himself by his prudent conduct worthy of that honour which his good fortune and the death of his generals had twice acquired him. Beloved by the troops, who, remembering the prosperity which they had enjoyed under his command, served him with the utmost alacrity, he let slip no opportunity of harassing the enemy, and by continual alarms or sallies fatigued and weakened them. 17 As an addition to all these mis- fortunes, the diseases common in that country during the sultry months began to break out among the French troops. The prisoners communicated to them the pestilence which the imperial army had brought to Naples from Rome, and it raged with such violence that few, either officers or soldiers, escaped the infec- tion. Of the whole army, not four thousand men, a number hardly sufficient to defend the camp, were capable of doing duty ; 18 and, being now besieged in their turn, they suffered all the miseries from which the imperialists were delivered. Lautrec, after struggling long with so many disappointments and calamities, which preyed on his mind at the same time that the pestilence wasted his body, died, lamenting the negligence of his sovereign and the infidelity of his allies, to which so many brave men had fallen victims. 19 By his death, and the indisposition of the other generals, the com- mand devolved on the marquis de Saluces, an officer altogether unequal to such a trust. He, with troops no less dispirited than reduced, retreated in disorder to Aversa ; which town being invested by the prince of Orange, Saluces was under the necessity of con- 17 Jovii Hist., lib. xxxvi. p. 31, 18 Bellay, 117, etc. etc. Sigonii Vita Doriae, p. 1139. l9 P. Heuter., Eenun Austr., lib. Bellay, 114, etc. r. c. 2, p. 231. VOL. /- Q Q 594 EETGtf OF THE PBOOV - senting that he himself should remain a prisoner of war, that his troops should lay down their arms and colours, give up their baggage, and march under a guard to the frontiers of France. By this ignominious capitula- tion the wretched remains of the French army were saved ; and the emperor, by his own perseverance and the good conduct of his generals, acquired once more the superiority in Italy. 20 The loss of Genoa followed immediately upon the ruin of the army in Naples. To deliver his country from the dominion of foreigners was Doria's highest ambition, and had been his principal inducement to quit the service of France and enter into that of the emperor. A most favourable opportunity for executing this honourable enterprise now presented itself. The city of Genoa, afflicted by the pestilence, was almost deserted by its inhabitants ; the French garrison, being neither regularly paid nor recruited, was reduced to an incon- siderable number ; Doria's emissaries found that such of the citizens as remained, being weary alike of the French and imperial yoke, the rigour of which they had alternately felt, were ready to welcome him as their deliverer and to second all his measures. Things wear- ing this promising aspect, he sailed towards the coast of Genoa ; on his approach the French galleys retired ; a small body of men which he landed surprised one of the gates of Genoa in the night-time; Trivulci, the French governor, with his feeble garrison, shut himself up in the citadel, and Doria took possession of the town without bloodshed or resistance. Want of provisions quickly obliged Trivulci to capitulate ; the people, eager to abolish such an odious monument of their servitude, ran together with a tumultuous violence and levelled the citadel with the ground. It was now in Doria's power to have rendered him- * Bellay, 117, etc. Jovii Hist, lib. xxv., xxvi BOOK v.l EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 595 self the sovereign of his country, which he had so happily delivered from oppression. The fame of his former actions, the success of his present attempt, the attachment of his friends, the gratitude of his country- men, together with the support of the emperor, all con- spired to facilitate his attaining the supreme authority and invited him to lay hold of it. But, with a magna- nimity of which there are few examples, he sacrificed all thoughts of aggrandizing himself to the virtuous satisfaction of establishing liberty in his country, the highest object at which ambition can aim. Having assembled the whole body of the people in the court before his palace, he assured them that the happiness of seeing them once more in possession of freedom was to him a full reward for all his services ; that, more delighted with the name of citizen than of sovereign, he claimed no pre-eminence or power above his equals, but remitted entirely to them the right of settling what form of government they would now choose to be established among them. The people listened to him with tears of admiration and of joy. Twelve persons were elected to new-model the constitution of the republic. The influ- ence of Doria's virtue and example communicated itself to his countrymen : the factions which had long torn and ruined the state seemed to be forgotten ; prudent precautions were taken to prevent their reviving ; and the same form of government which hath subsisted with little variation since that time in Genoa was established with universal applause. Doria lived to a great age, beloved, respected, and honoured by his countrymen ; and, adhering uniformly to his professions of moderation, without arrogating any thing unbecoming a private citizen, he preserved a great ascendant over the councils of the republic, which owed its being to his generosity. The authority which he possessed was more flattering, as well as more satisfactory, than that derived from Q Q 2 59(5 BEIGN OF THE [BOOK v. sovereignty, a dominion founded in love and in grati- tude, and upheld by veneration for his virtues, not by the dread of his power. His memory is still reverenced by the Genoese ; and he is distinguished in their public monuments, and celebrated in the works of their his- torians, by the most honourable of all appellations, THE FATHER OF HIS COUNTRY, AND THE RESTORER OF ITS LIBERTY. 21 Francis, in order to recover the reputation of his arms, discredited by so many losses, made new efforts in the Milanese. But the count of St. Pol, a rash and unexperienced officer, to whom he gave the command, was no match for Antonio de Leyva, the ablest of the imperial generals. He, by his superior skill in war, checked, with a handful of men, the brisk but ill- concerted motions of the French ; and, though so infirm himself that he was carried constantly in a litter, he surpassed them, when occasion required, no less in activity than in prudence. By an unexpected march, he surprised, defeated, and took prisoner the count of St. Pol, ruining the French army in the Milanese as entirely as the prince of Orange had ruined that which besieged Naples. 22 Amidst these vigorous operations in the field, each party discovered an impatient desire of peace, and continual negotiations were carried on for that purpose. The French king, discouraged and almost exhausted by so many unsuccessful enterprises, was reduced now to think of obtaining the release of his sons by concessions, not by the terror of his arms. The pope hoped to recover by a treaty whatever he had lost in the war. The emperor, notwithstanding the advantages which he had gained, had many reasons to make him wish for an 21 Guic., lib. xix. 498. Sigonii 22 Guic., lib. xix. 520. P. Heu- Vita Dorise, p. 1146. Jovii Hist, ter., Rer. Austr., lib. x. c. 3, p. 233. lib. xxvi. p. 36, etc. Mom. de Bellay, p. 121. BOOK v.] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 597 accommodation. Solyman, having overrun Hungary, was ready to break in upon the Austrian territories with the whole force of the East. The Eeformation gaining ground daily in Germany, the princes who favoured it had entered into a confederacy which Charles thought dangerous to the tranquillity of the empire. The Spaniards murmured at a war of such unusual length, the weight of which rested chiefly on them. The variety mid extent of the emperor's operations far exceeded what his revenues could support : his success hitherto had been owing chiefly to his own good fortune and to the abilities of his generals ; nor could he flatter himself that they, with troops destitute of every thing necessary, would always triumph over enemies still in a condition to renew their attacks. All parties, however, were at equal pains to conceal or to dissemble their real senti- ments. The emperor, that his inability to carry on the war might not be suspected, insisted on high terms in the tone of a conqueror. The pope, solicitous not to lose his present allies before he came to any agreement with Charles, continued to make a thousand protesta- tions of fidelity to the former, while he privately negotiated with the latter. Francis, afraid that his confederates might prevent him by treating for them- selves with the emperor, had recourse to many dis- honourable artifices in order to turn their attention from the measures which he was taking to adjust all differ- ences with his rival. In this situation of affairs, when all the contending powers wished for peace but durst not venture too hastily on the steps necessary for attaining it, two ladies undertook to procure this blessing so much desired by all Europe. These were Margaret of Austria, duchess dowager of Savoy, the emperor's aunt, and Louise, Francis's mother. They agreed on an interview at Cambray, and, being lodged in two adjoining houses, 598 REIGN OP THE [BOOK v. between which a communication was opened, met together without ceremony or observation, and held daily conferences, to which no person whatever was admitted. As both were profoundly skilled in business, thoroughly acquainted with the secrets of their respec- tive courts, and possessed with perfect confidence in each other, they soon made great progress towards a final accommodation; and the ambassadors of all the confederates waited in anxious suspense to know their fate, the determination of which was entirely in the hands of those illustrious negotiators. 23 But, whatever diligence they used to hasten forward a general peace, the pope had the address and industry to get the start of his allies, by concluding at Barcelona a particular treaty for himself. The emperor, impatient to visit Italy in his way to Germany, and desirous of re-establishing tranquillity in the one country before he attempted to compose the disorders which abounded in the other, found it necessary to secure at least one alliance among the Italian states on which he might depend. That with Clement, who courted it with un- wearied importunity, seemed more proper than any other. Charles, being extremely solicitous to make some reparation for the insults which he had offered to the sacred character of the pope, and to redeem past offences by new merit, granted Clement, notwithstand- ing all his misfortunes, terms more favourable than he could have expected after a continued series of suc- cesses. Among other articles, he engaged to restore all the territories belonging to the ecclesiastical state, to re-establish the dominion of the Medici in Florence, to give his natural daughter in marriage to Alexander, the head of that family, and to put it in the pope's power to decide concerning the fate of Sforza and the P. Heater., Rer. Austr., lib. x. c. 3, p. 133. Mifco. de Bollay, p. 23 J22, BOOK v.] EMPEROE CHARLES THE FIFTH. 599 possession of the Milanese. In return for these ample concessions, Clement gave the emperor the investiture of Naples without the reserve of any tribute but the present of a white steed in acknowledgment of his sovereignty, absolved all who had been concerned in assaulting and plundering Rome, and permitted Charles and his brother Ferdinand to levy the fourth of the ecclesiastical revenues throughout their dominions. 24 The account of this transaction quickened the nego- tiations at Cambray, and brought Margaret and Louise to an immediate agreement. The treaty of Madrid served as the basis of that which they concluded ; the latter being intended to mitigate the rigour of the former. The chief articles were, that the emperor should not for the present demand the restitution of Burgundy, reserving, however, in full force his rights and pretensions to that duchy ; that Francis should pay two millions of crowns as the ransom of his sons, and, before they were set at liberty, should restore such towns as he still held in the Milanese ; that he should resign his pretensions to the sovereignty of Flanders and of Artois ; that he should renounce all his preten- sions to Naples, Milan, Genoa, and every other place beyond the Alps ; that he should immediately consum- mate the marriage concluded between him and the emperor's sister Eleanora. 25 Thus Francis, chiefly from his impatience to procure liberty to his sons, sacrificed every thing which had at first prompted him to take arms, or which had induced him, by continuing hostilities during nine successive campaigns, to protract the war to a length hardly known in Europe before the establishment of standing armies and the imposition of exorbitant taxes became universal. The emperor, by this treaty, was rendered sole arbiter 24 Guic., lib. xix. 522. c. 3, p. 234. Sandoval, Hist del 84 P Heuter., Rer. Austr., lib. x. Emper. Car. V., ii. 28. 600 EEIGN OF THE [BOOK v. of the fate of Italy ; lie delivered his territories in the Netherlands from an unpleasant badge of subjection ; and, after having baffled his rival in the field, he pre- scribed to him the conditions of peace. The different conduct and spirit with -which the two monarchs carried on the operations of war led naturally to such an issue of it. Charles, inclined by temper as well as obliged by his situation, concerted all his schemes with caution, pursued them with perseverance, and, observing circum- stances and events with attention, let none escape that could be improved to advantage. Francis, more enter- prising than steady, undertook great designs with warmth, but often executed them with remissness, and, diverted by his pleasures or deceived by his favourites, he lost on several occasions the most promising oppor- tunities of success. Nor had the character of the two rivals themselves greater influence on the operations of war than the opposite qualities of the generals whom they employed. Among the imperialists, valour tem- pered with prudence, fertility of invention, aided by experience, discernment to penetrate the designs of their enemies, a provident sagacity in conducting their own measures, in a word, all the talents which form great commanders and insure victory, were conspicu- ous. Among the French these qualities were either wanting, or the very reverse of them abounded; nor could they boast of one man (unless we except Lautrec, who was always unfortunate) that equalled the merit of Pescara, Leyva, Guasto, the prince of Orange, and other leaders, whom Charles had set in opposition to them. Bourbon, Morone, Doria, who by their abilities and con- duct might have been capable of balancing the supe- riority which the imperialists had acquired, were induced to abandon the service of France, by the carelessness of the king and the malice or injustice of his counsellors; and the most fatal blows given to France during the BOOK v.] EMPEROR CHAELES THE FIFTH. G01 progress of the war proceeded from the despair and resentment of these three persons. The hard conditions to which Francis was obliged to submit were not the most afflicting circumstances to him in the treaty of Cambray. He lost his reputation, and the confidence of all Europe, by abandoning his allies to his rival. Unwilling to enter into the details necessary for adjusting their interests, or afraid that whatever he claimed for them must have been pur- chased by farther concessions on his own part, he gave them up in a body, and, without the least provision in their behalf, left the Venetians, the Florentines, the duke of Ferrara, together with such of the Neapolitan barons as had joined his army, to the mercy of the emperor. They exclaimed loudly against this base and perfidious action, of which Francis himself was so much ashamed that, in order to avoid the pain of hearing from their ambassadors the reproaches which he justly merited, it was some time before he would consent to allow them an audience. Charles, on the other hand, was attentive to the interest of every person who had adhered to him : the rights of some of his Flemish subjects who had estates or pretensions in France were secured ; one article was inserted, obliging Francis to restore the blood and memory of the Constable Bourbon, and to grant his heirs the possession of his lauds which had been forfeited ; another, by which the indemnifica- tion was stipulated for those French gentlemen who had accompanied Bourbon in his exile. 26 This conduct, laudable in itself, and placed in the most striking light by a comparison with that of Francis, gained Charles as much esteem as the success of his arms had acquired him glory. Francis did not treat the king of England with the same neglect as his other allies. He communicated to 26 Guic.. lib. xix. p. 525. P. Heuter., Ber. Austr., lib. x. c. 4, p. 236. 602 EEIGN OF THE [BOOK T. him all the steps of his negotiation at Cambray, and luckily found that monarch in a situation which left him no choice but to approve implicitly of his measures, and to concur with them. Henry had been soliciting the pope for some time in order to obtain a divorce from Catharine of Aragon, his queen. Several motives combined in prompting the king to urge his suit. As he was powerfully influenced at some seasons by religious considerations, he entertained many scruples concerning the legitimacy of his marriage with his brother's widow ; his affections had long been estranged from the queen, who was older than himself, and had lost all the charms which she possessed in the earlier part of her life ; he was passionately desirous of having male issue ; Wolsey artfully fortified his scruples, and encouraged his hopes, that he might widen the breach between him and the emperor, Catharine's nephew ; and, what was more forcible, perhaps, in its operation than all these united, the king had conceived a violent love for the celebrated Anne Boleyn, a young lady of great beauty, and of greater accomplishments, whom, as he found it im- possible to gain her on other terms, he determined to raise to the throne. The papal authority had often been interposed to grant divorces for reasons less specious than those which Henry produced. When the matter was first proposed to Clement, during his imprisonment in the castle of St. Angelo, as his hopes of recovering liberty depended -entirely on the king of England and his ally of France, he expressed the warmest inclination to gratify him. But no sooner was he set free than he discovered other sentiments. Charles, who espoused the protection of his aunt with zeal inflamed by resent- ment, alarmed the pope, on the one hand, with threats which made a deep impression on his timid mind, and allured him, on the other, with those promises in favour of his family which he afterwards accomplished. Upon BOOK v.] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 603 the prospect of these, Clement not only forgot all his obligations to Henry, but ventured to endanger the interests of the Romish religion in England, and to run the risk of alienating that kingdom for ever from the obedience of the papal see. After amusing Henry during two years with all the subtleties and chicane which the court of Eome can so dexterously employ to protract or defeat any cause, after displaying the whole extent of his ambiguous and deceitful policy, the intri- cacies of which the English historians, to whom it properly belongs, have found it no easy matter to trace and unravel, he at last recalled the powers of the delegates whom he had appointed to judge in the point, avocated the cause to Eome, leaving the king no other hope of obtaining a divorce but from the personal decision of the pope himself. As Clement was now in strict alliance with the emperor, who had purchased his friendship by the exorbitant concessions which have been mentioned, Henry despaired of procuring any sentence from the former but what was dictated by the latter. His honour, however, and passions concurred in preventing him from relinquishing his scheme of a divorce, which he determined to accomplish by other means, and at any rate ; and the continuance of Francis's friendship being necessary to counterbalance the emperor's power, he, in order to secure that, not only offered no remonstrances against the total neglect of their allies in the treaty of Cambray, but made Francis the present of a large sum as a brotherly contribution towards the payment of the ransom for his sons. 27 Soon after the treaty of peace was concluded, the emperor landed in Italy with a numerous train of the Spanish nobility and a considerable body of troops. He left the government of Spain, during his absence, * 7 Herbert, M&n. de Bellay, 122. 604 REIGN OF THE [BOOK v, to the empress Isabella. By his long residence in that country he had acquired such thorough knowledge of the character of the people that he could perfectly accommodate the maxims of his government to their genius. He could even assume, upon some occasions, such popular manners as gained wonderfully upon the Spaniards. A striking instance of his disposition to gratify them had occurred a few days before he em- barked for Italy. He was to make his public entry into the city of Barcelona ; and some doubts having arisen among the inhabitants whether they should receive him as emperor or as count of Barcelona, Charles instantly decided in favour of the latter, declaring that he was more proud of that ancient title than of his imperial crown. Soothed with this flattering expression of his regard, the citizens welcomed him with acclamations of joy; and the states of the province swore allegiance to his son Philip, as heir of the county of Barcelona. A similar oath had been taken in all the kingdoms of Spain, with equal satisfaction. 28 The emperor appeared in Italy with the pomp and power of a conqueror. Ambassadors from all the princes and states of that country attended his court, waiting to receive his decision with regard to- their fate. At Genoa, where he first landed, he was received with the acclamations due to the protector of their liberties. Having honoured Doria with many marks of dis- tinction, and bestowed on the republic several new privileges, he proceeded to Bologna, the place fixed upon for his interview with the pope. He affected to unite in his public entry into that city the state and majesty that suited an emperor with the humility becoming an obedient son of the Church ; and while at the head of twenty thousand veteran soldiers, able to give law to all Italy, he kneeled down to kiss the feet of that very * 8 Sandoval, ii. p. f>0. Ferreras, ix. 116. BOOK vl EMPEROB CHABLES THE FIFTH. 605 pope whom he had so lately detained a prisoner. The Italians, after suffering so much from the ferocity and licentiousness of his armies, and after having been long accustomed to form in their imagination a picture of Charles which bore some resemblance to that of the barbarous monarchs of the Goths or Huns, who had formerly afflicted their country with like calamities, were surprised to see a prince of a graceful appearance, affable and courteous in his deportment, of regular manners, and of exemplary attention to all the offices of religion. 29 They were still more astonished when he settled all the concerns of the princes and states which now depended on him with a degree of moderation and equity much beyond what they had expected. Charles himself, when he set out from Spain, far from intending to give any such extraordinary proof of his self-denial, seems to have been resolved to avail himself to the utmost of the superiority which he had acquired in Italy. But various circumstances concurred in pointing out the necessity of pursuing a very different course. The progress of the Turkish sultan, who, after overrunning Hungary, had penetrated into Austria and laid siege to Vienna with an army of a hundred and fifty thousand men, loudly called upon him to collect his whole force to oppose that torrent ; and though the valour of the Germans, the prudent conduct of Ferdinand, together with the treachery of the vizier, soon obliged Solyman to abandon that enterprise with disgrace and loss, the religious disorders still growing in Germany rendered the presence of the emperor highly necessary there. 30 The Florentines, instead of giving their consent to the re-establishment of the Medici, which by the treaty of Barcelona the emperor had bound himself to procure, were preparing to defend their liberty by force 38 Sandoval, Hist, del Emp. CarL * Sleidan., 121. Guic., lib. JOE. V., ii. 50, 53, etc. 660. (506 KEIGKN OF THH [BOOK v. of arms ; the preparations for his journey had involved him in unusual expenses ; and on this, as well as many other occasions, the multiplicity of his affairs, together with the narrowness of his revenues, obliged him to contract the schemes which his boundless ambition was apt to form, and to forego present and certain advan- tages that he might guard against more remote but unavoidable dangers. Charles, from all these considera- tions, finding it necessary to assume an air of moderation, acted his part with a good grace. He admitted Sforza into his presence, and not only gave him a full pardon of all past offences, but granted him the investiture of the duchy, together with his niece, the king of Den- mark's daughter, in marriage. He allowed the duke of Ferrara to keep possession of all his dominions, adjusting the points in dispute between him and the pope with an impartiality not very agreeable to the latter. He came to a final accommodation with the Venetians, upon the reasonable condition of their restoring whatever they had usurped during the late war, either in the Nea- politan or papal territories. In return for so many concessions, he exacted considerable sums from each of the powers with whom he treated, which they paid without reluctance, and which afforded him the means of proceeding on his journey towards Germany with a magnificence suitable to his dignity. 31 These treaties, which restored tranquillity to Italy after a tedious war, the calamities of which had chiefly affected that country, were published at Bologna with great solemnity on the first day of the year 1530, amidst the universal acclamations of the people ; applauding the emperor, to whose moderation and generosity they ascribed the blessings of peace which they had so long desired. The Florentines alone did not partake of this general joy. Animated with a zeal for liberty more 31 SandoVal, ii. 55, etc. HOOK v.] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 607 laudable than prudent, they determined to oppose the restoration of the Medici. The imperial army had already entered their territories and formed the siege of their capital. But though deserted by all their allies, and left without any hope of succour, they defended themselves many months with an obstinate valour worthy of better success ; and even when they surrendered they obtained a capitulation which gave them hopes of securing some remains of their liberty. But the em- peror, from his desire to gratify the pope, frustrated all their expectations, and, abolishing their ancient form of government, raised Alexander de' Medici to the same absolute dominion over that state which his family have retained to the present times. Philibert de Chalons, prince of Orange, the imperial general, was killed during this siege. His estate and titles descended to his sister, Claude de Chalons, who was married to Rene', count of Nassau; and she transmitted to her posterity of the house of Nassau the title of princes of Orange, which by their superior talents and valour they have rendered so illustrious. 32 After the publication of the peace at Bologna, and the ceremony of his coronation as king of Lombardy and emperor of the Romans, which the pope performed with the accustomed formalities, nothing detained Charles in Italy ; M and he began to prepare for his journey to Germany. His presence became every day more necessary in that country, and was solicited with equal importunity by the Catholics and by the favourers of the new doctrines. During that long interval of tranquillity which the absence of the emperor, the con- tests between him and the pope, and his attention to the war with France afforded them, the latter gained much 32 Guic., lib. xx., p. 341, etc. 33 H. Cornel. Agrippa de duplici P. Heuter., Rer. Austr., lib. ii. c. 4, coronatione Car. V., ap. Scard., ii. p. 236. 226. 608 EEIQN OP THE [BOOK V. ground. Most of the princes who had embraced Luther's opinions had not only established in their territories that form of worship which he approved, but had entirely suppressed the rites of the Eomish Church. Many of the free cities had imitated their conduct. Almost one- half of the Germanic body had revolted from the papal see; and its authority, even in those provinces which had not hitherto shaken off the yoke, was considerably weakened, partly by the example of revolt in the neigh- bouring states, partly by the secret progress of the Keformed doctrine, even in those countries where it was not openly embraced. Whatever satisfaction the emperor, while he was at open enmity with the see of Borne, might have felt in those events which tended to mortify and embarrass the pope, he could not help perceiving now that the religious divisions in Germany would, in the end, prove extremely hurtful to the imperial authority. The weakness of former emperors had suffered the great vassals oi the empire to make such successful encroachments upon their power and prerogative that during the whole course of the war, which had often required the exertion of his utmost strength, Charles hardly drew any effectual aid from Germany, and found that magnificent titles or obsolete pretensions were almost the only advantages which he had gained by swaying the imperial sceptre. He became fully sensible that if he did not recover in some degree the prerogatives which his predecessors had lost, and acquire the authority as well as possess the name of head of the empire, his high dignity would contribute more to obstruct than to promote his ambitious schemes. Nothing, he saw, was more essential towards attaining this than to suppress opinions which might form new bonds of confederacy among the princes of the empire and unite them by ties stronger and more sacred than any political connection. Nothing seemed to lead more BOOK v.] EMPEEOE CHAELES THE FIFTH. 609 certainly to the accomplishment of his design than to employ zeal for the established religion, of which he was the natural protector, as the instrument of extending his civil authority. Accordingly, a prospect no sooner opened of coming to an accommodation with the pope than, by the em- peror's appointment, a diet of the empire was held at Spires, in order to take into consideration the state of religion. The decree of the diet assembled there in the year 1526, which was almost equivalent to a toleration of Luther's opinions, had given great offence to the rest of Christendom. The greatest delicacy of address, how- ever, was requisite in proceeding to any decision more rigorous. The minds of men, kept in perpetual agitation by a controversy carried on during twelve years without intermission of debate or abatement of zeal, were now inflamed to a high degree. They were accustomed to innovations, and saw the boldest of them successful. Having not only abolished old rites, but substituted new forms in their place, they were influenced as much by attachment to the system which they had embraced as by aversion to that which they had abandoned. Luther himself, of a spirit not to be worn out by the length and obstinacy of the combat or to become remiss upon success, continued the attack with as much vigour as he had begun it. His disciples, of whom many equalled him in zeal and some surpassed him in learning, were no less capable than their master to conduct the controversy in the properest manner. Many of the laity, some even of the princes, trained up amidst these incessant disputations, and in the habit of listening to the arguments of the contending parties, who alternately appealed to them as judges, came to be profoundly skilled in all the questions which were agitated, and, upon occasion, could show themselves not inexpert in any of the arts with which these theological encounters VOL. I. K K 610 REIGN OP THE [BOOK. r. were managed. It was obvious from all these circum- stances that any violent decision of the diet must have immediately precipitated matters into confusion and have kindled in Germany the flames of a religious war. All, therefore, that the archduke, and the other commis- sioners appointed by the emperor, demanded of the diet, was to enjoin those states of the empire which had hitherto obeyed the decree issued against Luther at Worms, in the year 1524, to persevere in the observa- tion of it, and to prohibit the other states from attempt- ing any further innovation in religion, particularly from abolishing the mass, before the meeting of a general council. After much dispute, a decree to that effect was approved of by a majority of voices. 34 1529.] The elector of Saxony, the marquis of Brandenburg, the landgrave of Hesse, the dukes of Lunenburg, the prince of Anhalt, together with the deputies of fourteen imperial or free cities, 35 entered a solemn protest against this decree, as unjust and impious. On that account they were distinguished by the name of PROTESTANTS,* an appellation which hath since become better known and more honourable by its being applied indiscrimi- nately to all the sects, of whatever denomination, which have revolted from the Eoman see. Not satisfied with this declaration of their dissent from the decree of the diet, the Protestants sent ambassadors into Italy to lay their grievances before the emperor; from whom they met with the most discouraging reception. Charles was at that time in close union with the pope, and solicitous to attach him inviolably to his interests. During their long residence at Bologna they held many consultations concerning the most effectual means of 84 Sleid., Hist., 117. Weissemburg, Nordlingen, and St. is The fourteen cities were Stras- Gall. burg, Nuremberg, Ulm, Constance, 36 Sleid., Hist., 119. F. Paul, Eeutlingen, Windsheim, Meiningen, Hist, p. 46. Seckend., ii. 127. Liudau, Kenvpten, Heilbronn. Isna, BOOK v.J EMPEEOE CHAELES THE FIFTH. 611 extirpating the heresies which had sprung up in Ger- many. Clement, whose cautious and timid mind the proposal of a general council filled with horror even beyond what popes, the constant enemies of such assem- blies, usually feel, employed every argument to dissuade the emperor from consenting to that measure. He represented general councils as factious, ungovernable, presumptous, formidable to civil authority, and too slow in their operations to remedy disorders which required an immediate cure. Experience, he said, had now taught both the emperor and himself that forbearance and lenity, instead of soothing the spirit of innovation, had rendered it more enterprising and presumptuous : it was necessary, therefore, to have recourse to the rigorous methods which such a desperate case required ; Leo's sentence of excommunication, together with the decree of the diet at Worms, should be carried into execution ; and it was incumbent on the emperor to employ his whole power in order to overawe those on whom the reverence due either to ecclesiastical or civil authority had no longer any influence. Charles, whose views were very different from the pope's, and who became daily more sensible how obstinate and deep- rooted the evil was, thought of reconciling the Protest- ants by means less violent, and considered the convocation of a council as no improper expedient for that purpose, but promised, if gentler arts failed of success, that then he would exert himself with rigour to reduce to the obedience of the holy see those stubborn enemies of the Catholic faith. 87 Such were the sentiments with which the emperor set out for Germany, having already appointed a diet of the empire to be held at Augsburg. In his journey 17 F. Paul, xlviL Seek, lib. ii. burg, par. D. Cliytraeus, 4to, Antw. 142. Hist de la Confess. d'Augs- 1672, p. 6. 612 EEIGN OF THE [BOOK v. towards that city lie had many opportunities of observing the disposition of the Germans with regard to the points in controversy, and found their minds every- where so much irritated and inflamed as convinced him that nothing tending to severity or rigour ought to be attempted until all other measures proved ineffectual. He made his public entry into Augsburg with extra- ordinary pomp, and found there such a full assembly of the members of the diet as was suitable both to the importance of the affairs which were to come under their consideration, and to the honour of an emperor who, after a long absence, returned to them crowned with reputation and success. His presence seems to have communicated to all parties an unusual spirit of moderation and desire of peace. The elector of Saxony would not permit Luther to accompany him to the diet, lest he should offend the emperor by bringing into his presence a person excommunicated by the pope, and who had been the author of all those dissen- sions which it now appeared so difficult to compose. At the emperor's desire, all the Protestant princes for- bade the divines who accompanied them to preach in public during their residence at Augsburg. For the same reason, they employed Melancthon, the man of the greatest learning as well as of the most pacific and gentle spirit among the Reformers, to draw up a con- fession of their faith, expressed in terms as little offen- sive to the Koman Catholics as a regard for truth would permit. Melancthon, who seldom suffered the rancour of controversy to envenom his style, even in writings purely polemical, executed a task so agreeable to his natural disposition with great moderation and address. The creed which he composed, known by the name of the Confession of Augsburg, from the place where it was presented, was read publicly in the diet. Some popish divines were appointed to examine it ; they brought in BOOK v.] EMPEROE CHARLES THE FIFTH. 613 their animadversions ; a dispute ensued between them and Melancthon, seconded by some of his brethren ; but though Melancthon softened some articles, made concessions with regard to others, and put the least ex- ceptionable sense upon all, though the emperor him- self laboured with great earnestness to reconcile the contending parties, so many marks of distinction were now established, and such insuperable barriers placed between the two churches, that all hopes of bringing about a coalition seemed utterly desperate. 38 From the divines, among whom his endeavours had been so unsuccessful, Charles turned to the princes their patrons. Nor did he find them, how desirous soever of accommodation, or willing to oblige the emperor, more disposed than the former to renounce their opinions. At that time, zeal for religion took possession of the minds of men to a degree which can scarcely be conceived by those who live in an age when the passions excited by the first manifestation of truth and the first recovery of liberty have in a great measure ceased to operate. This zeal was then of such strength as to overcome attachment to their political interests, which is commonly the predominant motive among princes. The elector of Saxony, the landgrave of Hesse, and other chiefs of the Protestants, though solicited separately by the emperor, and allured by the promise or prospect of those advantages which it was known they were more solicitous to attain, refused, with a fortitude highly worthy of imitation, to abandon what they deemed the cause of God, for the sake of any earthly acquisition. 39 Every scheme in order to gain or disunite the Pro- 38 Seckend., lib. ii 159. etc. 159. Abr. Sculteti Annales Evangdici, 39 Sleid., 132. Scultet. Annal., ap. Herm. Von der Hard., Hist 168. Liter. Reform., Lips., 1717, foL, p. 614 REIGN OF THE [BOOK v. testant party proving abortive, nothing now remained for the emperor but to take some vigorous measures towards asserting the doctrines and authority of the established Church. These, Campeggio, the papal nuncio, had always recommended as the only proper and effectual course of dealing with such obstinate heretics. In compliance with his opinions and remon- strances, the diet issued a decree condemning most of the peculiar tenets held by the Protestants, forbidding any person to protect or tolerate such as taught them, enjoining a strict observance of the established rites, and prohibiting any further innovation, under severe penalties. All orders of men were required to assist with their persons and fortunes in carrying this decree into execution; and such as refused to obey it were declared incapable of acting as judges, or of appearing as parties in the imperial chamber, the supreme court of judicature in the empire. To all which was sub- joined a promise that an application should be made to the pope requiring him to call a general council within six months, in order to terminate all contro- versies by its sovereign decisions. 40 The severity of this decree, which was considered as a prelude to the most violent persecution, alarmed the Protestants and convinced them that the emperor was resolved on their destruction. The dread of those calamities which were ready to fall on the Church op- pressed the feeble spirit of Melancthon, and, as if the cause had already been desperate, he gave himself up to melancholy and lamentation. But Luther, who during the meeting of the diet had endeavoured to con- firm and animate his party by several treatises which he addressed to them, was not disconcerted or dis- mayed at the prospect of this new danger. He com- forted Melancthon and his other desponding disciples, 40 Sleid., 139. BOOK v.] EMPEROE CHARLES THE FIFTH. 615 and exhorted the princes not to abandon those truths which they had lately asserted with such laudable boldness. 41 His exhortations made the deeper impres- sion upon them as they were greatly alarmed at that time by the account of a combination among the popish princes of the empire for the maintenance of the established religion, to which Charles himself had acceded. 42 This convinced them that it was necessary to stand on their guard, and that their own safety, as well as the success of their cause, depended on union. Filled with this dread of the adverse party, and with these sentiments concerning the conduct proper for themselves, they assembled at Smalkalde. There they concluded a league of mutual defence against all aggressors, 43 by which they formed the Protestant states of the empire into one regular body, and, beginning already to consider themselves as such, they resolved to apply to the kings of France and England and to implore them to patronize and assist their new con- federacy. An affair not connected with religion furnished them with a pretence for courting the aid of foreign princes. Charles, whose ambitious views enlarged in proportion to the increase of his power and grandeur, had formed a scheme of continuing the imperial crown in his family, by procuring his brother Ferdinand to be elected king of the Eomans. The present juncture was favourable for the execution of that design. The emperor's arms had been everywhere victorious; he had given law to all Europe at the late peace ; no rival now remained in a condition to balance or to control him; and the electors, dazzled with the splendour of his success, or overawed by the greatness of his power, durst scarcely dispute the will of a prince whose solici- 41 Seek., ii 180. Sleid. 140. 42 Seek., iL 200 ; iii. 11. - 43 Sleid., 142. 616 REIGN OF THE [BOOK v. tations carried with them the authority of commands. Nor did he want plausible reasons to enforce the measure. The affairs of his other kingdoms, he said, obliged him to be often absent from Germany ; the growing disorders occasioned by the controversies about religion, as well as the formidable neighbourhood of the Turks, who continually threatened to break in with their desolating armies into the heart of the em- pire, required the constant presence of a prince en- dowed with prudence capable of composing the former, and with power as well as valour sufficient to repel the latter. His brother Ferdinand possessed these qualities in an eminent degree ; by residing long in Germany, he had acquired a thorough knowledge of its constitution and manners ; having been present almost from the first rise of the religious dissensions, he knew what remedies were most proper, what the Germans could bear, and how to apply them ; as his own dominions lay on the Turkish frontier, he was the natural defender of Germany against the invasions of the infidels, being prompted by interest no less than he would be bound in duty to oppose them. These arguments made little impression on the Pro- testants. Experience taught them that nothing had contributed more to the undisturbed progress of their opinions than the interregnum after Maximilian's death, the long absence of Charles, and the slackness of the reins of government which these occasioned. Con- scious of the advantages which their cause had derived from this relaxation of government, they were un- willing to render it more vigorous by giving themselves a new and a fixed master. They perceived clearly the extent of Charles's ambition, that he aimed at rendering the imperial crown hereditary in his family, and would of course establish in the empire an absolute dominion, to which elective princes could not have aspired with equal BOOK v.] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 617 facility. They determined, therefore, to oppose the elec- tion of Ferdinand with the utmost vigour, and to rouse their countrymen, by their example and exhortations, to withstand this encroachment on their liberties. The elector of Saxony, accordingly, not only refused to be present at the electoral college which the emperor sum- moned to meet at Cologne, but instructed his eldest son to appear there and to protest against the election as in- formal, illegal, contrary to the articles of the golden bull, and subversive of the liberties of the empire. But the other electors, whom Charles had been at great pains to gain, without regarding either his absence or protest, chose Ferdinand king of the Eomans, who, a few days after, was crowned at Aix-la-Chapelle. 44 When the Protestants, who were assembled a second time at Smalkalde, received an account of this transac- tion, and heard at the same time that prosecutions were commenced in the imperial chamber against some of their number on account of their religious principles, they thought it necessary not only to renew their former con- federacy, but immediately to despatch their ambassadors into France arid England. Francis had observed with all the jealousy of a rival the reputation which the emperor had acquired by his seeming disinterested- ness and moderation in settling the affairs in Italy, and beheld with great concern the successful step which he had taken towards perpetuating and extending his authority in Germany by the election of a king of the Boinaiis. Nothing, however, would have been more impolitic than to precipitate his kingdom into a new war, when exhausted by extraordinary efforts and dis- couraged by ill success, before it had got time to recruit its strength or to forget past misfortunes. As no provo- cation had been given by the emperor, and hardly a pre- 44 Sleid., 142. Seek., iii. 1. P. Heuter., Rer. Austr., lib. x c. 6, p. 240. 618 EEIGN OF THE [BOOK v. text for a rupture had been afforded him, he could not violate a treaty of peace which he himself had so lately solicited, without forfeiting the esteem of all Europe and being detested as a prince void of probity and honour. He observed with great joy powerful factions beginning to form in the empire ; he listened with the utmost eager- ness to the complaints of the Protestant princes, and, without seeming to countenance their religious opinions, determined secretly to cherish those sparks of political discord which might be afterwards kindled into a flame. For this purpose he sent William de Bellay, one of the ablest negotiators in France, into Germany, who, visiting the courts of the malcontent princes, and heightening their ill humour by various arts, concluded an alliance between them and his master, 45 which, though concealed at that time, and productive of no immediate effects, laid the foundation of a union fatal on many occasions to Charles's ambitious projects, and showed the discontented princes of Germany where, for the future, they might find a protector no less able than willing to undertake their defence against the encroachments of the emperor. The king of England, highly incensed against Charles, in complaisance to whom the pope had long retarded and now openly opposed his divorce, was no less disposed than Francis to strengthen a league which might be rendered so formidable to the emperor. But his favourite project of the divorce led him into such a labyrinth of schemes and negotiations, and he was at the same time so intent on abolishing the papal jurisdiction in England, that he had no leisure for foreign affairs. This obliged him to rest satisfied with giving general promises, to- gether with a small supply in money, to the confederates of Smalkalde. 46 Meanwhile, many circumstances convinced Charles 45 M&n. de Bellay, 129 a, 1 30 b. Seek., iii. 14t 46 Herbert, 152, 154. BOOK v.] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH* 619 that this was not a juncture when the extirpation of heresy was to be attempted by violence and rigour ; that, in compliance with the pope's inclinations, he had already proceeded with imprudent precipitation ; and that it was more his interest to consolidate Germany into one united and vigorous body than to divide and enfeeble it by a civil war. The Protestants, who were considerable as well by their numbers as by their zeal, had acquired additional weight and importance by their joining in that confederacy into which the rash steps taken at Augs- burg had forced them. Having now discovered their own strength, they despised the decisions of the imperial chamber, and, being secure of foreign protection, were ready to set the head of the empire at defiance. At the same time, the peace with France was precarious, the friendship of an irresolute and interested pontiff was not to be relied on, and Solyman, in order to repair the discredit and loss which his arms had sustained in the former cam- paign, was preparing to enter Austria with more numerous forces. On all these accounts, especially the last, a speedy accommodation with the malcontent princes became ne- cessary, not only for the accomplishment of his future schemes, but for insuring his present safety. Negotia- tions were accordingly carried on by his direction with the elector of Saxony and his associates. After many delays, occasioned by their jealousy of the emperor and of each other, after innumerable difficulties arising from the ineflxible nature of religious tenets, which cannot admit of being altered, modified, or relinquished in the same manner as points of political interest, terms of pacification were agreed upon at Nuremberg and ratified solemnly in the diet at Eatisbon. In this treaty it was stipulated that universal peace be established in Germany until the meeting of a general council, the convocation of which within six months the emperor shaJ endeavour to procure ; that no person shall be molested on account of fi20 REIGN OF THE TBOOK r. religion ; that a stop shall be put to all processes begun by the imperial chamber against Protestants, and the sentences already passed to their detriment shall be declared void. On their part, the Protestants engaged to assist the emperor with all their forces in resisting the invasion of the Turks. 47 Thus, by their firmness in ad- hering to their principles, by the unanimity with which they urged all their claims, and by their dexterity in availing themselves of the emperor's situation ; the Pro- testants obtained terms which amounted almost to a toleration of their religion ; all the concessions were made by Charles, none by them ; even the favourite point of their approving his brother's election was not mentioned ; and the Protestants of Germany, who had hitherto been viewed only as a religious sect, came henceforth to be considered as a political body of no small conse- quence. 48 The intelligence which Charles received of Soly man's having entered Hungary at the head of three hundred thousand men brought the deliberations of the diet at Ratisbon to a period, the contingent both of troops and money which each prince was to furnish towards the defence of the empire having been already settled. The Protestants, as a testimony of their gratitude to the em- peror, exerted themselves with extraordinary zeal, and brought into the field forces which exceeded in number the quota imposed on them ; and, the Catholics imitating their example, one of the greatest and best-appointod armies that had ever been levied in Germany assembled near Vienna. Being joined by a body of Spanish and Italian veterans under the marquis del Guasto, by some heavy armed cavalry from the Low Countries, and by the troops which Ferdinand had raised in Bohemia, Austria, and his other territories, it amounted in all to 47 Du Mont, Corps Diplomatique, torn. iv. part ii. 87, 89. * Sleid., 149, etc. Seek., iii. 19. BOOK v.J EMPEROE UHABLES THE FIFTH. 621 ninety thousand disciplined foot and thirty thousand horse, besides a prodigious swarm of irregulars. Of this vast array, worthy the first prince in Christendom, the emperor took the command in person, and mankind waited in suspense the issue of a decisive battle between the two greatest monarchs in the world. But, each of them dreading the other's power and good fortune, they both conducted their operations with such excessive caution that a campaign for which such immense pre- parations had been made ended without any memorable event. Solyman, finding it impossible to gain ground upon an enemy always attentive and on his guard, marched back to Constantinople towards the end of autumn. 49 It is remarkable that, in such a martial age, when every gentleman was a soldier and every prince a general, this was the first time that Charles, who had already carried on such extensive wars and gained so many victories, appeared at the head of his troops. In this first essay of his arms, to have opposed such a leader as Solyman was no small honour ; to have obliged him to retreat, merited very considerable praise. About the beginning of this campaign, the elector of Saxony died, and was succeeded by his son, John Frederick. The Reformation rather gained than lost by that event : the new elector, no less attached than his predecessors to the opinions of Luther, occupied the station which they had held at the head of the Protestant party, and defended with the boldness and zeal of youth that cause which they had fostered and reared with the caution of more advanced age. Immediately after the retreat of the Turks, Charles, impatient to revisit Spain, set out on his way thither, for Italy. As he was extremely desirous of an inter- view with the pope, they met a second time at Bologna, with the same external demonstrations of respect and 49 Jovii Hist, lib. xxx. p. 100, etc. Barre, Hist, de 1'Empire, i. 8, 647. 622 EEIGN OF THE [BOOK v. friendship, but with little of that confidence which had subsisted between them during their late negotiations there. Clement was much dissatisfied with the em- peror's proceedings at Augsburg, his concessions with regard to the speedy convocation of a council having more than cancelled all the merit of the severe decree against the doctrines of the Eeformers. The toleration granted to the Protestants at Eatisbon, and the more explicit promise concerning a council with which it was accompanied, had irritated him still farther. Charles, however, partly from conviction that the meeting of a council would be attended with salutary effects, and partly from his desire to please the Germans, having solicited the pope by his ambassadors to call that assembly without delay, and now urging the same thing in person, Clement was greatly embarrassed what reply he should make to a request which it was indecent to refuse and dangerous to grant. He endeavoured at first to divert Charles from the measure ; but, finding him inflexible, he had recourse to artifices which he knew would delay, if not entirely defeat, the calling of that assembly. Under the plausible pretext of its being previously necessary to settle, with all parties concerned, the place of the council's meeting, the manner of its proceedings, the right of the persons who should be admitted to vote, and the authority of their decisions, he despatched a nuncio, accompanied by an ambassador from the emperor, to the elector of Saxony, as head of the Protestants. With regard to each of these articles, inextricable difficulties and contests arose. The Pro- testants demanded a council to be held in Germany ; the pope insisted that it should meet in Italy : they contended that all points in dispute should be deter- mined by the words of Holy Scripture alone ; he con- sidered not only the decrees of the Church, but the opinions of fathers and doctors, as of equal authority : BOOK v.] EMPEBOB CHARLES THE FIFTH. 623 they required a free council, in which the divines, commissioned by different churches, should be allowed a voice; he aimed at modelling the council in such a manner as would render it entirely dependent on his pleasure. Above all, the Protestants thought it un- reasonable that they should bind themselves to submit to the decrees of a council before they knew on what principles these decrees were to be founded, by what persons they were to be pronounced, and what forms of proceeding they would observe. The pope maintained it to be altogether unnecessary to call a council if those who demanded it did not previously declare their resolu- tion to acquiesce in its decrees. In order to adjust such a variety of points, many expedients were pro- posed, and the negotiations spun out to such a length as effectually answered Clement's purpose of putting off the meeting of a council, without drawing on himself the whole infamy of obstructing a measure which all Europe deemed so essential to the good of the Church. 50 Together with this negotiation about calling a council, the emperor carried on another, which he had still more aj; heart, for securing the peace established in Italy. As Francis had renounced his pretensions in that country with great reluctance, Charles made no doubt but that he would lay hold on the first pretext afforded him, or embrace the first opportunity which presented itself, of recovering what he had lost. It became necessary, on this account, to take measures for assembling an army able to oppose him. As his treasury, drained by a long war, could not supply the sums requisite for keeping such a body constantly on foot, he attempted to throw that burden on his allies, and to provide for the safety of his own dominions at their expense, by proposing that the Italian states 511 F. Paul, Hist., 62. Seckend., iii. 73. 624 REIGN OF THE [BOOK v. should enter into a league of defence against all in- vaders ; that on the first appearance of danger an army should be raised and maintained at the common charge ; and that Antonio de Leyva should be appointed the generalissimo. Nor was the proposal unacceptable to Clement, though for a reason very different from that which induced the emperor to make it. He hoped by this expedient to deliver Italy from the German and Spanish veterans, which had so long filled all the powers in that country with terror, and still kept them in sub- jection to the imperial yoke. A league was accordingly concluded ; all the Italian states, the Venetians excepted, acceded to it; the sum which each of the contracting partners should furnish towards maintaining the army was fixed ; the emperor agreed to withdraw the troops which gave so much umbrage to his allies, and which he was unable any longer to support. Having dis- banded part of them, and removed the rest to Sicily and Spain, he embarked on board Doria's galleys and arrived at Barcelona. 51 Notwithstanding all his precautions for securing the peace of Germany and maintaining that system which he had established in Italy, the emperor became every day more and more apprehensive that both would be soon disturbed by the intrigues or arms of the French king. His apprehensions were well founded, as nothing but the desperate situation of his affairs could have brought Francis to give his consent to a treaty so dis- honourable and disadvantageous as that of Cambray. He, at the very time of ratifying it, had formed a resolution to observe it no longer than necessity com- pelled him, and took a solemn protest, though with the most profound secrecy, against several articles in the treaty, particularly that whereby he renounced all pre- tensions to the duchy of Milan, as unjust, injurious to w Guic., lib. , 551, Fen-eras, ix. 149. v.j EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 625 his heirs, and invalid. One of the crown lawyers, by his command, entered a protest to the same purpose, and with the like secrecy, when the ratification of the treaty was registered in the parliament of Paris. 58 Francis seems to have thought that by employing an artifice unworthy of a king, destructive of public faith, and of the mutual confidence on which all transactions between nations are founded, he was released from any obligation to perform the most solemn promises or to adhere to the most sacred engagements. From the moment he concluded the peace of Cambray, he wished and watched for an opportunity of violating it with safety. He endeavoured for that reason to strengthen his alliance with the king of England, whose friendship he culti- vated with the greatest assiduity. He put the military force of his own kingdom on a better and more respect- able footing than ever. He artfully fomented the jealousy and discontent of the German princes. 52 But above all Francis laboured to break the strict con- federacy which subsisted between Charles and Clement ; and he had soon the satisfaction to observe appearances of disgust and alienation arising in the mind of that suspicious and interested pontiff, which gave him hopes that their union would not be lasting. As the emperor's decision in favour of the duke of Ferrara had greatly irritated the pope, Francis aggravated the injustice of that proceeding, and flattered Clement that the papal see would find in him a more impartial and no less powerful protector. As the importunity with which Charles demanded a council was extremely offensive to the pope, Francis artfully created obstacles to prevent it, and attempted to divert the German princes, his allies, from insisting so obstinately on that point. 53 As the emperor had gained such an ascendant over Clement " Du Mont, Corps Diplom., torn. M Mem. de Belluy, 141, etc. iv. part ii. p. 52. Seek., iii. 48. F Paul, 63. VOL. i. s g 626 EEIGN OF THE [WOK v. by contributing to aggrandize his family, Francis endea- voured to allure him by the same irresistible bait, proposing a marriage between his second son, Henry, duke of Orleans, and Catharine, the daughter of the pope's cousin, Laurence de' Medici. On the first over- ture of this match, the emperor could not persuade himself that Francis really intended to debase the royal blood of France by an alliance with Catharine, whose ancestors had been so lately private citizens and mer- chants in Florence, and believed that he meant only to natter or amuse the ambitious pontiff. He thought it necessary, however, to efface the impression which such a dazzling offer might have made, by promising to break off the marriage which had been agreed on between his own niece, the king of Denmark's daughter, and the duke of Milan, and to substitute Catharine in her place. But, the French ambassador producing unexpectedly full powers to conclude the marriage-treaty with the duke of Orleans, this expedient had no effect. Clement was so highly pleased with an honour which added such lustre and dignity to the house of Medici that he offered to grant Catharine the investiture of considerable terri- tories in Italy, by way of portion ; he seemed ready to support Francis in prosecuting his ancient claims in that country, and consented to a personal interview with that nonarch 54 Charles was at the utmost pains to prevent a meeting ,n which nothing was likely to pass but what would be of detriment to him ; nor could he bear, after he had twice condescended to visit the pope in his own terri- tories, that Clement should bestow such a mark of dis- tinction on his rival as to venture on a voyage by sea, at an unfavourable season, in order to pay court to Francis in the French dominions. But the pope's eagerness to accomplish the match overcame all the 64 Guic., lib. xx. 551, 553. Mem. de Bellay, 138. *OOK v.] EMPEfcOfc CHAELES THE FIFTH. 627 scruples of pride, or fear, or jealousy, which would have probably influenced him on any other occasion. The interview, notwithstanding several artifices of the emperor to prevent it, took place at Marseilles, with extraordinary pomp, and demonstrations of confidence on both sides ; and the marriage, which the ambition and abilities of Catharine rendered in the sequel as pernicious to France as it was then thought dishonour- able, was consummated. But whatever schemes may have been secretly concerted by the pope and Francis in favour of the duke of Orleans, to whom his father proposed to make over all his rights in Italy, so careful were they to avoid giving any cause of offence to the emperor that no treaty was concluded between them ; 55 and even in the marriage- articles Catherine renounced all claims and pretensions in Italy, except to the duchy of Urbino. 56 But at the very time when he was carrying on these negotiations, and forming this connection with Francis, which gave so great umbrage to the emperor, such was the artifice and duplicity of Clement's character that he suffered the latter to direct all his proceedings with regard to the king of England, and was no less atten- tive to gratify him in that particular than if the most cordial union had subsisted between them. Henry's suit for a divorce had now continued near six years ; during all which period the pope negotiated, promised, retracted, and concluded nothing. After bearing re- peated delays and disappointments longer than could have been expected from a prince of such a choleric find impetuous temper, the patience of Henry was at last so much exhausted that he applied to another tribunal for that decree which he had solicited in vain at Rome. Cranmer, archbishop of Canterbury, by a sentence founded on the authority of universities, M Guic., lib. xx. 556. w Du Mont, Corps Diplom., iv. part ii. 101. 882 628 EEIGN OF THE [BOOK v. doctors, and rabbis, who had been consulted with respect to the point, annulled the king's marriage with Catharine ; her daughter was declared illegitimate, and Anne Boleyn acknowledged as queen of England. At the same time, Henry began not only to neglect and to threaten the pope, whom he had hitherto courted, but to make innovations in the Church of which he had formerly been such a zealous defender. Clement, who had already seen so many provinces and kingdoms revolt from the Holy See, became apprehensive at last that England might imitate their example, and, partly from his solicitude to prevent that fatal blow, partly in com- pliance with the French king's solicitations, determined to give Henry such satisfaction as might retain him within the bosom of the Church. But the violence of the cardinals, devoted to the emperor, did not allow the pope leisure for executing this prudent resolution, and hurried him, with a precipitation fatal to the Eoman see, to issue a bull rescinding Cranmer's sentence, con- firming Henry's marriage with Catharine, and declaring him excommunicated if within a time specified he did not abandon the wife he had taken and return to her whom he had deserted. Enraged at this unexpected decree, Henry kept no longer any measures with the court of Eome; his subjects seconded his resentment and indignation; an act of parliament was passed abolishing the papal power and jurisdiction in England ; by another, the king was declared supreme head of the Church, and all the authority of which the popes were deprived was vested in him. That vast fabric of ecclesi- astical dominion which had been raised with such art, and of which the foundations seemed to have been laid so deep, being no longer supported by the veneration of the people, was overturned in a moment. Henry him- self, with the caprice peculiar to his character, continued to defend the doctrines of the Eomish Church as fiercely BOOK v.] EMPEKOB CHARLB6 THE FIFTH. 629 as he attacked its jurisdiction. He alternately perse- cuted the Protestants for rejecting the former, and the Catholics for acknowledging the latter. But his sub- jects, being once permitted to enter into new paths, did not choose to stop short at the precise point prescribed by him. Having been encouraged by his example to break some of their fetters, they were so impatient to shake off what still remained 57 that in the following reign, with the applause of the greater part of the nation, a total separation was made from the Church of Rome in articles of doctrine, as well as in matters of discipline and jurisdiction. A short delay might have saved the see of Rome from all the unhappy consequences of Clement's rashness. Soon after his sentence against Henry, he fell into a languishing distemper, which, gradually wasting his constitution, put an end to his pontificate, the most un- fortunate, both during its continuance and by its effects, that the Church had known for many ages. The very day on which the cardinals entered the conclave, they raised to the papal throne Alexander Farnese, dean of the sacred college, and the oldest member of that body, who assumed the name of Paul III. The account of his promotion was received with extraordinary acclamations of joy by the people of Rome, highly pleased, after an interval of more than a hundred years, to see the crown of St. Peter placed on the head of a Roman citizen. Persons more capable of judging formed a favourable presage of his administration, from the experience which he had acquired under four pontificates, as well as the character of prudence and moderation which he had uniformly maintained in a station of great eminence, and during an active period, that required both talents and address. 58 57 Herbert. Burnet, Hist of Re- S8 Guic., lib. xx, 656, F. form. 64. 630 REIGN OF THE [BOOK v. Europe, it is probable, owed the continuance of its peace to the death of Clement ; for, although no traces remain in history of any league concluded between him and Francis, it is scarcely to be doubted but that he would have seconded the operations of the French arms in Italy, that he might have gratified his ambition by seeing one of his family possessed of the supreme power in Florence, and another in Milan. But upon the elec- tion of Paul III., who had hitherto adhered uniformly to the imperial interest, Francis found it necessary to suspend his operations for some time, and to put off the commencement of hostilities against the emperor, on which, before the death of Clement, he had been fully determined. While Francis waited for an opportunity to renew a war which had hitherto proved so fatal to himself and his subjects, a transaction of a very singular nature was carried on in Germany. Among many beneficial and salutary effects of which the Eef ormation was the immediate cause, it was attended, as must be the case in all actions and events wherein men are concerned, with some consequences of an opposite nature. When the human mind is roused by grand objects and agitated by strong passions, its operations acquire such force that they are apt to become irregular and extravagant. Upon any great revolution in religion, such irregularities abound most at that particular period when men, having thrown off the authority of their ancient principles, do not yet fully comprehend the nature or feel the obliga- tion of those new tenets which they have embraced. The mind, in that situation, pushing forward with the boldness which prompted it to reject established opinions, and not guided by a clear knowledge of the system substituted in their place, disdains all restraint, and runs into wild notions, which often lead to scandalous or im- moral conduct. Thus, in the first ages of the Christian BOOK v.J EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 631 Church, many of the new converts, having renounced their ancient systems of religious faith, and being but imperfectly acquainted with the doctrines and precepts of Christianity, broached the most extravagant opinions, equally subversive of piety and virtue ; all which errors disappeared or were exploded when the knowledge of religion increased and came to be more generally diffused. In like manner, soon after Luther's appearance, the rashness or ignorance of some of his disciples led them to publish tenets no less absurd than pernicious, which, being proposed to men extremely illiterate but fond of novelty, and at a time when their minds were occupied chiefly with religious speculations, gained too easy credit and authority among them. To these causes must be imputed the extravagances of Muncer, in the year 1525, as well as the rapid progress which his opinions made among the peasants ; but, though the insurrection ex- cited by that fanatic was soon suppressed, several of his followers lurked in different places, and endeavoured privately to propagate his opinions. In those provinces of Upper Germany which had already been so cruelly wasted by their enthusiastic rage, the magistrates watched theii motions with such severe attention that many of them found it necessary to retire into other countries; some were punished, others driven into exile, and their errors were entirely rooted out. But in the Netherlands and Westphalia, where the pernicious tendency of their opinions was more unknown and guarded against with less care, they got admittance into several towns, and spread the infec- tion of their principles. The most remarkable of their religious tenets related to the sacrament of baptism, which, as they contended, ought to be administered only to persons grown up to years of understanding, and should be performed, not by sprinkling them witli water, but by dipping them in it : for this reason they 632 REIGN OF THE [BOOK v. condemned the baptism of infants, and, rebaptizing all whom they admitted into their society, the sect came to be distinguished by the name of Anabaptists. To this peculiar notion concerning baptism, which has the ap- pearance of being founded on the practice of the Church in the apostolic age, and contains nothing inconsistent with the peace and order of human society, they added other principles of a most enthusiastic as well as danger- ous nature. They maintained that among Christians, who had the precepts of the gospel to direct and the Spirit of God to guide them, the office of magistracy was not only unnecessary, but an unlawful encroachment on their spiritual liberty ; that the distinctions occasioned by birth or rank or wealth, being contrary to the spirit of the gospel, which considers all men as equals, should be entirely abolished ; that all Christians, throwing their possessions into one common stock, should live together in that state of equality which becomes mem- bers of the same family ; that as neither the laws of nature nor the precepts of the New Testament had imposed any restraints upon men with regard to the number of wives which they might marry, they should use that liberty which God himself had granted to the patriarchs. Such opinions, propagated and maintained with en- thusiastic zeal and boldness, were not long without producing the violent effects natural to them. Two Anabaptist prophets, John Matthias, a baker of Haer- lem, and John Boccold, or Beiikels, a journeyman tailor of Leyden, possessed with the rage of making pro- selytes, fixed their residence at Munster, an imperial city in Westphalia, of the first rank, under the sove- reignty of its bishop, but governed by its own senate and consuls. As neither of these fanatics wanted the talents requisite in desperate enterprises, great resolu- tion, the appearance of sanctity^ bold pretensions to BOOK v.] EMPEROK CHARLES THE FIFTH. 633 inspiration, and a confident and plausible manner of discoursing, they soon gained many converts. Among these were Kothman, who had first preached the Pro- testant doctrine in Munster, and Cnipperdoling, a citizen of good birth and considerable eminence. Emboldened by the countenance of such disciples, they openly taught their opinions; and, not satisfied with that liberty, they made several attempts, though without success, to become masters of the town, in order to get their tenets established by public authority. At last, having secretly called in their associates from the neighbouring country, they suddenly took possession of the arsenal and senate- house in the night-time, and, running through the streets with drawn swords and horrible howlings, cried out alternately, " Eepent, and be baptized," and, "Depart, ye ungodly." The senators, the canons, the nobility, together with the more sober citizens, whether Papists or Protestants, terrified at their threats and outcries, fled in confusion, and left the city under the dominion of a frantic multitude consisting chiefly of strangers. Nothing now remaining to overawe or control them, they set about modelling the government according to their own wild ideas ; and though at first they showed so much reverence for the ancient constitution as to select senators of their own, and to appoint Cnipperdoling and another proselyte consuls, this was nothing more than form ; for all their proceedings were directed by Matthias, who, in the style and with the authority of a prophet, uttered his commands, which it was instant death to disobey. Having begun with encouraging the multitude to pillage the churches and deface their ornaments, he enjoined them to destroy all books except the Bible, as useless or impious ; he ordered the estates of such as fled to be confiscated and sold to the inhabitants of the adjacent country ; he com- manded every man to bring forth his gold, silver, and 634 REIGN OP THE [BOOK v. other precious effects, and to lay them at his feet ; the wealth amassed by these means he deposited in a public treasury, and named deacons to dispense it for the common use of all. The members of his common- wealth being thus brought to a perfect equality, he commanded all of them to eat at tables prepared in public, and even prescribed the dishes which were to be served up each day. Having finished his plan of reformation, his next care was to provide for the defence of the city ; and he took measures for that purpose with a prudence which savoured nothing of fanaticism. He collected large magazines of every kind ; he repaired and extended the fortifications, obliging every person without distinction to work in his turn ; he formed such as were capable of bearing arms into regular bodies, and endeavoured to add the stability of discipline to the impetuosity of enthusiasm. He sent emissaries to the Anabaptists in the Low Countries, inviting them to assemble at Munster, which he dignified with the name of Mount Sion, that from thence they might set out to reduce all the nations of the earth under their dominion. He himself was unwearied in attending to everything necessary for the security or increase of the sect ; animating his disciples by his own example to decline no labour, as well as to submit to every hardship ; and, their enthusiastic passions being kept from subsiding by a perpetual succession of exhortations, revelations, and prophecies, they seemed ready to undertake or to suffer anything in maintenance of their opinions. While they were thus employed, the bishop of Munster, having assembled a considerable army, ad- vanced to besiege the town. On his approach, Matthias sallied out at the head of some chosen troops, attacked one quarter of his camp, forced it, and, after great slaughter, returned to the city loaded with glory and spoil. Intoxicated with this success, he appeared next BOOK v.] EMPEKOR OHAKLES THE FIFTH. 635 day brandishing a spear, and declared that, in imitation of Gideon, he would go forth with a handful of men and smite the host of the ungodly. Thirty persons, whom he named, followed him without hesitation in this wild enterprise, and, rushing on the enemy with a frantic courage, were cut off to a man. The death of their prophet occasioned at first great consternation among his disciples ; but Boccold, by the same gifts and pretensions which had gained Matthias credit, soon revived their spirits and hopes to such a degree that he succeeded the deceased prophet in the same absolute direction of all their affairs. As he did not possess that enterprising courage which distinguished his predecessor, he satisfied himself with carrying on a defensive war ; and, without attempting to annoy the enemy by sallies, he waited for the succours he expected from the Low Countries, the arrival of which was often foretold and promised by their prophets. But, though less daring in action than Matthias, he was a wilder enthusiast, and of more unbounded ambition. Soon after the death of his predecessor, having by obscure visions and prophecies prepared the multitude for some extraordinary event, he stripped himself naked, and, marching through the streets, proclaimed with a loud voice, " That the kingdom of Sion was at hand ; that whatever was highest on earth should be brought low, and whatever was lowest should be exalted." In order to fulfil this, he commanded the churches, as the most lofty buildings in the city, to be levelled with the ground ; he degraded the senators chosen by Matthias, and, depriving Cnipper doling of the consulship, the highest office in the commonwealth, appointed him to execute the lowest and most infamous, that of common hangman, to which strange transition the other agreed, not only without murmuring, but with the utmost joy ; and such was the despotic rigour of Boccold's adminis- 63 G REIGN OF THE [BOOK v. tration, that he was called almost every day to perform some duty or other of his wretched function. In place of the deposed senators, he named twelve judges, according to the number of tribes in Israel, to preside in all affairs, retaining to himself the same authority which Moses anciently possessed as legislator of that people. Not satisfied, however, with power or titles which were not supreme, a prophet, whom he had gained and tutored, having called the multitude together, declared it to be the will of God that John Boccold should be king of Sion, and sit on the throne of David. John, kneeling down, accepted of the heavenly call, which he solemnly protested had been revealed likewise to himself, and was immediately acknowledged as monarch by the deluded multitude. From that moment he assumed all the state and pomp of royalty. He wore a crown of gold, and was clad in the richest and most sumptuous garments. A Bible was carried on his one hand, a naked sword on the other. A great body of guards accompanied him when he appeared in public. He coined money stamped with his own image, and ap- pointed the great officers of his household, and kingdom, among whom Cnipperdoling was nominated governor of the city, as a reward for his former submission. Having now attained the height of power, Boccold began to discover passions which he had hitherto re- strained, or indulged only in secret. As the excesses of enthusiasm have been observed in every age to lead to sensual gratifications, the same constitution that is susceptible of the former being remarkably prone to the latter, he instructed the prophets and teachers to harangue the people for several days concerning the lawfulness, and even necessity, of taking more wives than one, which they asserted to be one of the privileges granted by God to the saints. When their ears were BOOK v.] EMPEROB CHAELES THE FIFTH. 637 once accustomed to this licentious doctrine, and their passions inflamed with the prospect of such unbounded indulgence, he himself set them an example of using what he called their Christian liberty, by marrying at once three wives, among which the widow of Matthias, a woman of singular beauty, was one. As he was allured by beauty, or the love of variety, he gradually added to the number of his wives until they amounted to fourteen, though the widow of Matthias was the only one dignified with the title of queen or who shared with him the splendour and ornaments of royalty. After the example of their prophet, the multi- tude gave themselves up to the most licentious and uncontrolled gratification of their desires. No man remained satisfied with a single wife. Not to use their Christian liberty was deemed a crime. Persons were appointed to search the houses for young women grown up to maturity, whom they instantly compelled to marry. Together with polygamy, freedom of divorce, its inseparable attendant, was introduced, and became a new source of corruption. Every excess was com- mitted of which the passions of men are capable when restrained neither by the authority of laws nor the sense of decency ; 59 and, by a monstrous and almost incredible conjunction, voluptuousness was engrafted on et concionatorum " Nemo unft contentus fuit, neque autoritate juxta et exemplo, tot& cuiquam extra effcetas et viris ini- urbe ad rapitndas pulcherriinas maturas continentiesselicuit." (Id., quasque fceminas discursum est. 307.) " Tacebo hie, lit sit suus Nee intra paucos dies, in tantfi, honor auribus, quanta barbaria et hominum turb&, fere ulla reperta militi usi sunt in puellis vitiandis est supra annum decimum quartum, nondum aptis matriinonio, id quod quse stuprum passa nou fuerit." mihi neque ex vano, neque ex vulgi (Lanib. Hortens., p. 303.) " Vulgo sermonibus haustura est, sed ex eft viris quinas esse uxores, pluribus vetul&, cui cura sic vitiatamm de- senas, nonnullis septenas et octonas. mandata fuit, auditum." Joh. Cor- Puellas supra duodecimuin setatis vinus, 316. annum statim amare." (Id., 305.) 638 REIGN OF THE [BOOK v. religion, and dissolute riot accompanied the austerities of fanatical devotion. Meanwhile, the German princes were highly offended at the insult offered to their dignity by Boccold's pre- sumptuous usurpation of royal honours ; and the pro- fligate manners of his followers, which were a reproach to the Christian name, filled men of all professions with horror. Luther, who had testified against this fanatical spirit on its first appearance, now deeply lamented its progress, and, having exposed the delusion with great strength of argument as well as acrimony of style, called loudly on all the states of Germany to put a stop to frenzy no less pernicious to society than fatal to religion. The emperor, occupied with other cares and projects, had not leisure to attend to such a distant object ; but the princes of the empire, assembled by the king of the Eomans, voted a supply of men and money to the bishop of Munster, who, being unable to keep a sufficient army on foot, had converted the siege of the town into a blockade. The forces raised in consequence of this resolution were put under the command of an officer of experience, who, approach- ing the town towards the end of spring in the year 1535, pressed it more closely than formerly, but found the fortifications so strong and so diligently guarded that he durst not attempt an assault. It was now about fifteen months since the Anabaptists had esta- blished their dominion in Munster; they had during that time undergone prodigious fatigue in working on the fortifications and performing military duty. Not- withstanding the prudent attention of their king to provide for their subsistence, and his frugal as well as regular economy in their public meals, they began to feel the approach of famine. Several small bodies of their brethren, who were advancing to their assistance from the Low Countries, had been intercepted and cut hook v.] EMPEBOfc CHARLES THE FIFTH. 639 to pieces ; and while all Germany was ready to com- bine against them, they had no prospect of succour. But such was the ascendant which Boccold had acquired over the multitude, and so powerful the fascination of enthusiasm, that their hopes were as sanguine as ever, and they hearkened with implicit credulity to the visions and predictions of their prophets, who assured them that the Almighty would speedily inter- pose in order to deliver the city. The faith, however, of some few, shaken by the violence and length of their sufferings, began to fail ; but, being suspected of an inclination to surrender to the enemy, they were punished with immediate death, as guilty of impiety in distrust- ing the power of God. One of the king's wives having uttered certain words which implied some doubt con- cerning his divine mission, he instantly called the whole number together, and, commanding the blas- phemer, as he called her, to kneel down, cut off her head with his own hands ; and so far were the rest from expressing any horror at this cruel deed, that they joined him in dancing with a frantic joy around the bleeding body of their companion. By this time the besieged endured the utmost rigour of famine; but they chose rather to suffer hardships the recital of which is shocking to humanity than to listen to the terms of capitulation offered them by the bishop. At last a deserter, whom they had taken into their service, being either less intoxicated with the fumes of enthusiasm, or unable any longer to bear such distress, made his escape to the enemy. He informed their general of a weak part in the fortifications which he had observed, and, assuring him that the besieged, exhausted with hunger and fatigue, kept watch there with little care, he offered to lead a party thither in the night. The proposal was accepted, and a chosen body of troops appointed for the service, who, scaling 640 EEIGN OF THE [BOOK V. the walls unperceived, seized one of the gates, and admitted the rest of the army. The Anabaptists, though surprised, defended themselves in the market-place with valour heightened by despair; but, being over- powered by numbers, and surrounded on every hand, most of them were slain, and the remainder were taken prisoners. Among the last were the king and Cuip- perdoling. The king, loaded with chains, was carried from city to city as a spectacle to gratify the curiosity of the people, and was exposed to all their insults. His spirit, however, was not broken or humbled by this sad reverse, of his condition; and he adhered with unshaken firmness to the distinguishing tenets of his sect. After this, he was brought back to Munster, the scene of his royalty and crimes, and put to death with the most exquisite as well as lingering tortures, all which he bore with astonishing fortitude. This extraordinary man, who had been able to acquire such amazing dominion over the minds of his followers and to excite commotions so dangerous to society, was only twenty-six years of age. 60 Together with its monarch, the kingdom of the Anabaptists came to an end. Their principles having taken deep root in the Low Countries, the party still subsists there, under the name of Mennonites; but, by a very singular revolution, this sect, so mutinous and sanguinary at its first origin, hath become altogether innocent and pacific. Holding it unlawful to wage war, or to accept of civil offices, they devote themselves entirely to the duties of private citizens, and by their industry and charity endeavour to make reparation to human society for the violence committed by their 60 Sleid., 190, etc. Tuiuultuum one, etc., libellus Antonii Corvini, Anabaptistarum, liber unus, Ant. ap. Scar. 313. Annales Anabap- Lamberto Hortensio Auctore, ap. tistici, a Job. Henrico Ottio, 4to, Scardium, vol. ii. p. 298, etc. De Basilese, 1672. Cor. Heersbachius, Mvserabili Monasteriensium Obsidi- Hist. Anab., edit. 1637, p. 140. v.J EMPEKOR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 641 founders. 61 A small number of this sect which is settled in England retain its peculiar tenets concern- ing baptism, but without any dangerous mixture of enthusiasm. The mutiny of the Anabaptists, though it drew general attention, did not so entirely engross the princes of Germany as not to allow leisure for other transac- tions. The alliance between the French king and the confederates at Smalkalde began about this time to produce great effects. Ulric, duke of Wurtemberg, having been expelled his dominions in the year 1519 on account of his violent and oppressive administra- tion, the house of Austria had got possession of his duchy. That prince, having now by a long exile atoned for the errors in his conduct, which were the effect rather of inexperience than of a tyrannical dis- position, was become the object of general compassion. The landgrave of Hesse, in particular, his near relation, warmly espoused his interest, and used many efforts to recover for him his ancient inheritance. But the king of the Eomans obstinately refused to relinquish a valuable acquisition which his fe_iily had made with so much ease. The landgrave, unable to compel him, applied to the king of France, his new ally. Francis, eager to embrace any opportunity of distressing the house of Austria, and desirous of wresting from it a territory which gave it footing and influence in a part of Germany at a distance from its other dominions, encouraged the landgrave to take arms, and secretly supplied him with a large sum of money. This he employed to raise troops, and, marching with great expedition towards Wurtemberg, attacked, defeated, and dispersed a considerable body of Austrians, intrusted with the defence of the country. All the duke's sub- jects hastened, with emulation, to receive their native 61 Bayle, Diction., ait. Anabaptistu. TOL. I T T 642 REIGN. OF THfi [BOOK T. prince, and reinvested him with, that authority which is still enjoyed by his descendants. At the same time, the exercise of the Protestant religion was established in his dominions. 62 Ferdinand, how sensible soever of this unexpected blow, not daring to attack a prince whom all the Pro- testant powers in Germany were ready to support, judged it expedient to conclude a treaty with him, by which, in the most ample form, he recognized his title to the duchy. The success of the landgrave's operations in behalf of the duke of Wurtemberg having convinced Ferdinand that a rupture with a league so formidable as that of Smalkalde was to be avoided with the utmost care, he entered likewise into a negotiation with the elector of Saxony, the head of that union; and by some concessions in favour of the Protestant religion, and others of advantage to the elector himself, he prevailed on him, together with his confederates, to acknowledge his title as king of the Eomans. At the same time, in order to prevent any such pre- cipitate or irregular election in times to come, it was agreed that no person should hereafter be promoted to that dignity without the unanimous consent of the electors ; and the emperor soon after confirmed this stipulation. 63 These acts of indulgence towards the Protestants, and the close union into which the king of the Eomans seemed to be entering with the princes of that party, gave great offence at Eome. Paul III., though he had departed from a resolution of his predecessor never to consent to the calling of a general council, and had promised, in the first consistory held after his election, that he would convoke that assembly so much desired by all Christendom, was no less enraged than Clement M Sleid. 172. Mem. de Bellay, 63 Sleid. 173. Corps Diplom., 159, etc. torn. iv. pp. 2, 119. BOOK r.j EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 643 at the innovations in Germany, and no less averse to any scheme for reforming either the doctrines of the Church or the abuses in the court of Rome. But, having been a witness of the universal censures which Clement had incurred by his obstinacy with regard to these points, he hoped to avoid the same reproach by the seeming alacrity with which he proposed a council ; nattering himself, however, that such difficulties would arise concerning the time and place of meeting, the persons who had a right to be present, and the order of their proceedings, as would effectually defeat the intention of those who demanded that assembly, with- out exposing himself to any imputation for refusing to call it. With this view, he despatched nuncios to the several courts, in order to make known his intention that he had fixed on Mantua as the proper place in which to hold the council. Such difficulties as the pope had foreseen immediately presented themselves in great number. The French king did not approve of the place which Paul had chosen, as the papal and imperial influ- ence would necessarily be too great in a town situated in that part of Italy. The king of England not only concurred with Francis in urging that objection, but refused, besides, to acknowledge any council called in the name and by the authority of the pope. The Ger- man Protestants, having met together at Smalkalde, insisted on their original demand of a council to be held in Germany, and, pleading the emperor's promise as well as the agreement at Eatisbon to that effect, declared that they would not consider an assembly held at Mantua as a legal or free representative of the Church. By this diversity of sentiments and views, such a field for intrigue and negotiation opened as made it easy for the pope to assume the merit of being eager to assemble a council, while at the same time he could put off its meeting at pleasure. The Protestants, on the other hand, suspect- 1- T * 644 BEIGN OF THE L BOOK v - ing his designs, and sensible of the importance which they derived from their union, renewed for ten years the league of Smalkalde, which now became stronger and more formidable by the accession of several new members. 64 During these transactions in Germany, the emperor undertook his famous enterprise against the piratical states in Africa. That part of the African continent lying along the coast of the Mediterranean Sea, which anciently formed the kingdoms of Mauritania and Mas- sylia, together with the republic of Carthage, and which is now known by the general name of Barbary, had undergone many revolutions. Subdued by the Romans, it became a province of their empire. When it was conquered afterwards by the Vandals, they erected a kingdom there. That being overturned by Belisarius, the country became subject to the Greek emperors, and continued to be so until it was overrun, towards the end of the seventh century, by the rapid and irresistible arms of the Arabians. It remained for some time a part of that vast empire which the Caliphs governed with ab- solute authority. Its immense distance, however, from the seat of government encouraged the descendants of those leaders who had subdued the country, or the chiefs of the Moors, its ancient inhabitants, to throw off the yoke and to assert their independence. The Caliphs, who derived their authority from a spirit of enthusiasm 64 This league was concluded De- Albert, counts of Mansfield ; Wil- cember, 1535, but not extended or liam, count of Nassau. The cities, signed in form till September in Strasburg, Nuremberg, Constance, the following year. The princes Ulin, Magdeburg, Bremen, Reut- who acceded to it were, John, elector lingen, Heilbronn, Memmingen, of Saxony ; Ernest, duke of Bruns- Lindau, Campen, Isna, Bibrac, wick ; Philip, landgrave of Hesse ; Windsheim, Aug.sburg, Frankfort, Ulric, duke of "\Turtemberg ; Bar- Esling, Brunswick, Goslar, Hanover, nim and Philip, dukes of Pomera- Gottingen, Eimbeck, Hamburg, nia ; John, George, and Joachim, Minden. princes of Anhulfc ; Gebhard and BOOK v.] EMPEROR CHAELES THE FIFTH. 645 more fitted for making conquests than for preserving them, were obliged to connive at acts of rebellion which they could not prevent ; and Barbary was divided into several kingdoms, of which Morocco, Algiers, and Tunis were the most considerable. The inhabitants of these kingdoms were a mixed race Arabs, Negroes from the southern provinces, and Moors, either natives of Africa, or who had been expelled out of Spain ; all zealous pro- fessors of the Mahometan religion, and inflamed against Christianity with a bigoted hatred proportional to their ignorance and barbarous manners. Among these people, no less daring, inconstant, and treacherous than the ancient inhabitants of the same country described by the Eoman historians, frequent seditions broke out, and many changes in government took place. These, as they affected only the internal state of a country extremely barbarous, are but little known, and deserve to be so. But about the beginning of the sixteenth century a sudden revolution happened, which, by rendering the states of Barbary formidable to the Europeans, hath made their history worthy of more attention. This revolution was brought about by per- sons born in a rank of life which entitled them to act no such illustrious part. Horuc and Hayradin, the sons of a potter in the isle of Lesbos, prompted by a restless and enterprising spirit, forsook their father's trade, ran to sea, and joined a crew of pirates. They soon distin- guished themselves by their valour and activity, and, becoming masters of a small brigantine, carried on their infamous trade with such conduct and success that they assembled a fleet of twelve galleys, besides many vessels of smaller force. Of this fleet Horuc, the elder brother, called Barbarossa from the red colour of his beard, was admiral, and Hayradin second in command, but with almost equal authority. They called themselves the friends of the sea, and the enemies of all who sail upon 646 REIGN OF THE [BOOK v. it ; and their names soon became terrible from the Straits of the Dardanelles to those of Gibraltar. Together with their fame and power, their ambitious views extended, and, while acting as corsairs, they adopted the ideas and acquired the talents of conquerors. They often carried the prizes which they took on the coast of Spain and Italy into the ports of Barbary, and, enriching the in- habitants by the sale of their booty and the thoughtless prodigality of their crews, were welcome guests in every place at which they touched. The convenient situation of these harbours, lying so near the greatest commercial states at that time in Christendom, made the brothers wish for an establishment in that country. An oppor- tunity of accomplishing this quickly presented itself, which they did not suffer to pass unimproved. Eutemi, king of Algiers, having attempted several times, without success, to take a fort which the Spanish governors of Oran had built not far from his capital, was so ill advised as to apply for aid to Barbarossa, whose valour the Africans considered as irresistible. The active cor- sair gladly accepted of the invitation, and, leaving his brother Hayradin with the fleet, marched at the head of five thousand men to Algiers, where he was received as their deliverer. Such a force gave him the command of the town ; and as he perceived that the Moors neither suspected him of any bad intention nor were capable with their light-armed troops of opposing his disciplined veterans, he secretly murdered the monarch whom he had come to assist, and proclaimed himself king of Algiers in his stead. The authority which he had thus boldly usurped he endeavoured to establish by arts suited to the genius of the people whom he had to govern ; by liberality without bounds to those who favoured his promotion, and by cruelty no less un- bounded towards all whom he had any reason to dis- trust. Not satisfied with the throne which ho had BOOK v.] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 647 acquired, he attacked the neighbouring king of Treme- cen, and, having vanquished him in battle, added his dominions to those of Algiers. At the same time, he continued to infest the coasts of Spain and Italy with fleets which resembled the armaments of a great monarch rather than the light squadrons of a corsair. Their fre- quent and cruel devastations obliged Charles, about the beginning of his reign, to furnish the marquis de Co- mares, governor of Oran, with troops sufficient to attack him. That officer, assisted by the dethroned king of Tremecen, executed the commission with such spirit that, Barbarossa's troops being beaten in several en- counters, he himself was shut up in Tremecen. After defending it to the last extremity, he was overtaken in attempting to make his escape, and slain while he fought with an obstinate valour worthy of his former fame and exploits. His brother Hayradin, known likewise by the name of Barbarossa, assumed the sceptre of Algiers with the same ambition and abilities, but with better for- tune. His reign being undisturbed by the arms of the Spaniards, which had full occupation in the wars among the European powers, he regulated with admir- able prudence the interior police of his kingdom, carried on his naval operations with great vigour, and extended his conquests on the continent of Africa. But, perceiv- ing that the Moors and Arabs submitted to his govern- ment with reluctance, and being afraid that his continual depredations would one day draw upon him the arms of the Christians, he put his dominions under the protection of the Grand Seignior, and received from him a body of Turkish soldiers sufficient for his domestic as well as foreign enemies. At last, the fame of his exploits daily increasing, Solyman offered him the command of the Turkish fleet, as the only person whose valour and skill in naval affairs entitled him to command against Andrew 648 EEIGN OF THE [BOOK v. Doria, the greatest sea-officer of that age. Proud of this distinction, Barbarossa repaired to Constantinople, and, with a wonderful versatility of mind, mingling the arts of a courtier with the boldness of a corsair, gained the entire confidence both of the sultan and his vizier. To them he communicated a scheme which he had formed of making himself master of Tunis, the most nourishing kingdom at that time on the coast of Africa ; and, this being approved of by them, he obtained whatever he demanded for carrying it into execution. His hopes of success in this undertaking were founded on the intestine divisions in the kingdom of Tunis. Mahmed, the last king of that country, having thirty- four sons by different wives, appointed Muley-Hascen, one of the youngest among them, to be his successor. That weak prince, who owed this preference not to his own merit, but to the ascendant which his mother had acquired over a monarch doting with age, first poisoned Mahmed, his father, in order to prevent him from alter- ing his destination with respect to the succession, and then, with the barbarous policy which prevails wherever polygamy is permitted, and the right of suc- cession is not precisely fixed, he put to death all his brothers whom he could get into his power. Alraschid, one of the eldest, was so fortunate as to escape his rage, and, finding a retreat among the wandering Arabs, made several attempts, by the assistance of some of their chiefs, to recover the throne which of right belonged to him. But these proving unsuc- cessful, and the Arabs, from their natural levity, being ready to deliver him up to his merciless brother, he fled to Algiers, the only place of refuge remaining, and implored the protection of Barbarossa, who, dis- cerning at once all the advantages which might be gained by supporting his title, received him with BOOK v.] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 649 every possible demonstration of friendship and respect. Being ready at that time to set sail for Constantinople, he easily persuaded Alraschid, whose eagerness to obtain a crown disposed him to believe or undertake anything, to accompany him thither, promising him effectual assistance from Solyman, whom he represented to be the most generous as well as most powerful monarch in the world. But no sooner were they arrived at Constantinople than the treacherous corsair, regardless of all his promises to him, opened to the sultan a plan for conquering Tunis and annexing it to the Turkish empire, by making use of the name of this exiled prince, and co-operating with the party in the kingdom which was ready to declare in his favour. Solyman approved, with too much facility, of this per- fidious proposal, extremely suitable to the character of its author, but altogether unworthy of a great prince. A powerful fleet and numerous army were soon as- sembled, at the sight of which the credulous Alraschid flattered himself that he should soon enter his capital in triumph. But just as this unhappy prince was going to embark, he was arrested by order of the sultan, shut up in the seraglio, and was never heard of more. Barbarossa sailed with a fleet of two hundred and fifty vessels towards Africa. After ravaging the coasts of Italy and spreading terror through every part of that country, he appeared before Tunis, and, landing his men, gave out that he came to assert the right of Alraschid, whom he pietended to have left sick aboard the admiral's galley. The fort of Goletta, which commands the bay, soon fell into his hands, partly by his own address, partly by the treachery of its commander ; and the inhabitants of Tunis, weary of Muley-Hascen's government, took arms, and declared for Alraschid with such zeal and unanimity as obliged the former to fly so precipitately 650 KEIGN OF THE [BOOK v. that he left all his treasures behind him. The gates were immediately set open to Barbarossa, as the restorer of their lawful sovereign. But when Alraschid him- self did not appear, and when, instead of his name, that of Solyman alone was heard among the acclama- tions of the Turkish soldiers marching into the town, the people of Tunis began to suspect the corsair's treachery. Their suspicions being soon converted into certainty, they ran to arms with the utmost fury, and surrounded the citadel into which Barbarossa had led his troops. But, having foreseen such a revolution, he was not unprepared for it : he immediately turned against them the artillery on the ramparts, and by one brisk discharge dispersed the numerous but undirected assailants, and forced them to acknowledge Solyman as their sovereign, and to submit to himself as his viceroy. His first care was to put the kingdom, of which he had thus got possession, in a proper posture of defence. He strengthened the citadel which commands the town, and, fortifying the Goletta in a regular manner, at vast expense, made it the principal station for his fleet, and his great arsenal for military as well as naval stores. Being now possessed of such extensive territories, he carried on his depredations against the Christian states to a greater extent and with more destructive violence than ever. Daily complaints of the outrages committed by his cruisers were brought to the emperor by his subjects, both in Spain and Italy. All Christendom seemed to expect from him, as its greatest and most fortunate prince, that he would put an end to this new and odious species of oppression. At the same time, Muley-Hascen, the exiled king of Tunis, finding none of the Mahometan princes in Africa willing or able to assist him in recovering his throne, applied to Charles as the only person who could assert his rights in oppo- BOOK v.] EMPEROE CHAELES THE FIFTH. 651 sition to such a formidable usurper. The emperor^ equally desirous of delivering his dominions from the dangerous neighbourhood of Barbarossa, of appearing as the protector of an unfortunate prince, and of ac- quiring the glory annexed in that age to every expe- dition against the Mahometans, readily concluded a treaty with Muley-Hasccn, and began to prepare for invading Tunis. Having made trial of his own abilities for war in the late campaign in Hungary, he was now become so fond of the military character that he deter- mined to command on this occasion in person. The united strength of his dominions was called out upon an enterprise in which the emperor was about to hazard his glory, and which drew the attention of all Europe. A Flemish fleet carried from the ports of the Low Coun- tries a body of German infantry ; 65 the galleys of Naples and Sicily took on board the veteran bands of Italians and Spaniards which had distinguished themselves by so many victories over the French ; the emperor himself embarked at Barcelona with the flower of the Spanish nobility, and was joined by a considerable squadron from Portugal, under the command of the Infant Don Lewis, the empress's brother ; Andrew Doria conducted his own galleys, the best appointed at that time in Europe, and commanded by the most skilful officers ; the pope fur- nished all the assistance in his power towards such a pious enterprise ; and the order of Malta, the perpetual enemies of the infidels, equipped a squadron, which, though small, was formidable by the valour of the knights who served on board it. The port of Cagliari in Sardinia was the general place of rendezvous. Doria was appointed high-admiral of the fleet ; the command of the land-forces under the emperor was given to the marquis del Guasto. 66 Haraei Annales Brabant., i. 599. 652 REIGN OF THE [BOOK v. On the 16 tli of July, the fleet, consisting of near five hundred vessels, having on board above thirty thousand regular troops, set sail from Cagliari, and, after a prosperous navigation, landed within sight of Tunis. Barbarossa, having received early intelligence of the emperor's immense armament, and suspecting its desti- nation, prepared with equal prudence and vigour for the defence of his new conquest. He called in all his cor- sairs from their different stations ; he drew from Algiers what forces could be spared ; he despatched messengers to all the African princes, Moors as well as Arabs, and, by representing Muley-Hascen as an infamous apostate, prompted by ambition and revenge not only to become the vassal of a Christian prince, but to conspire with him to extirpate the Mahometan faith, he inflamed those ignorant and bigoted chiefs to such a degree that they took arms as in a common cause. Twenty thousand horse, together with a great body of foot, soon assem- bled at Tunis ; and by a proper distribution of presents among them from time to time, Barbarossa kept the ardour which had brought them together from sub- siding. But, as he was too well acquainted with the enemy whom he had to oppose to think that these light troops could resist the heavy-armed cavalry and veteran infantry which composed the imperial army, his chief confidence was in the strength of the Goletta, and in his body of Turkish soldiers, who were armed and disci- plined after the European fashion. Six thousand of these, under the command of Sinan, a renegado Jew, the bravest and most experienced of all his corsairs, he threw into that fort, which the emperor immediately invested. As Charles had the command of the sea, his camp was so plentifully supplied not only with the necessaries but with all the luxuries of life that Muley- Hascen, who had not been accustomed to see war carried on with such ordir and magnificence, was filled with BOOK v.J EMPEEOE OHAELES THE FIFTH. 653 admiration of the emperor's power. His troops, ani- mated by his presence and considering it as meritorious to shed their blood in such a pious cause, contended with each other for the posts of honour and danger. Three separate attacks were concerted, and the Germans, Spaniards, and Italians, having one of these committed to each of them, pushed them forward with the eager courage which national emulation inspires. Sinan dis- played resolution and skill becoming the confidence which his master had put in him; the garrison per- formed the hard service on which they were ordered with great fortitude. But, though he interrupted the besiegers by frequent sallies, though the Moors and Arabs alarmed the camp with their continual incursions, the breaches soon became so considerable towards the land, while the fleet battered those parts of the fortifica- tions which it could approach with no less fury and success, that, an assault being given on all sides at once, the place was taken by storm. Sinan, with the remains of his garrison, retired, after an obstinate resistance, over a shallow part of the bay towards the city. By the re- duction of the Goletta, the emperor became master of Barbarossa's fleet, consisting of eighty-seven galleys and galliots, together with his arsenal and three hundred cannon, mostly brass, which were planted on the ram- parts ; a prodigious number in that age, and a remark- able proof of the strength of the fort, as well as of the greatness of the corsair's power. The emperor marched into the Goletta through the breach, and, turning to Muley-Hascen, who attended him, " Here," says he, " is a gate open to you, by which you shall return to take possession of your dominions." Barbarossa, though he felt the full weight of the blow which he had received, did not, however, lose courage or abandon the defence of Tunis. But, as the walls were of great extent and extremely weak, as he could REIGN OF THE [BOOK v. not depend on the fidelity of the inhabitants, nor hope that the Moors and Arabs would sustain the hardships of a siege, he boldly determined to advance with his army, which amounted to fifty thousand men, 66 towards the imperial camp, and to decide the fate of his king- dom by the issue of a battle. This resolution he com- municated to his principal officers, and, representing to them the fatal consequences which might follow if ten thousand Christian slaves whom he had shut up in the citadel should attempt to mutiny during the absence of the army, he proposed, as a necessary precaution for the public security, to massacre them without mercy before he began his march. They all approved warmly of his intention to fight; but, inured as they were in their piratical depredations to scenes of bloodshed and cruelty, the barbarity of his proposal concerning the slaves filled them with horror; and Barbarossa, rather from the dread of irritating them than swayed by motives of humanity, consented to spare the lives of the slaves. By this time the emperor had begun to advance towards Tunis; and, though his troops suffered incon- ceivable hardships in their march, over burning sands, destitute of water, and exposed to the intolerable heat of the sun, they soon came up with the enemy. The Moors and Arabs, emboldened by their vast superiority in number, immediately rushed on to the attack with loud shouts ; but their undisciplined courage could not long stand the shock of regular battalions ; and though Barbarossa, with admirable presence of mind, and by exposing his own person to the greatest dangers, en- deavoured to rally them, the rout became so general that he himself was hurried along with them in their flight back to the city. There he found everything in the " Epistres det Princes, par Ruscelli, p. 119, etc. BOOK v.] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 655 utmost confusion ; some of the inhabitants flying with their families and effects, others ready to set open their gates to the conqueror, the Turkish soldiers preparing to retreat, and the citadel, which in such circumstances might have afforded him some refuge, already in the possession of the Christian captives. These unhappy men, rendered desperate by their situation, had laid hold on the opportunity which Barbarossa dreaded. As soon as his army was at some distance from the town, they gained two of their keepers, by whose assistance, knocking off their fetters and bursting open their prisons, they overpowered the Turkish garrison and turned the artillery of the fort against their former masters. Barbarossa, disappointed and enraged, ex- claiming sometimes against the false compassion of his officers, and sometimes condemning his own imprudent compliance with their opinions, fled precipitately to Bona. Meanwhile, Charles, satisfied with the easy and almost bloodless victory which he had gained, and advancing slowly with the precaution necessary in an enemy's country, did not yet know the whole extent of his own good fortune. But at last a messenger despatched by the slaves acquainted him with the success of their noble effort for the recovery of their liberty ; and at the same time deputies arrived from the town, in order to present him the keys of their gates, and to implore his protection from military violence. While he was deliberating concerning the proper measures for this purpose, the soldiers, fearing that they should be deprived of the booty which they had expected, rushed suddenly and without orders into the town, and began to kill and plunder without distinction. It was then too late to restrain their cruelty, their avarice, or licen- tiousness. All the outrages of which soldiers are capable in the fury of a storm, all the excesses of which men 656 EEIGN OF THE [>OK v. can be guilty when their passions are heightened by the contempt and hatred which difference in manner^ and religion inspires, were committed. Above thirty thousand of the innocent inhabitants perished on that unhappy day, and ten thousand were carried away as slaves. Muley-Hascen took possession of a throne surrounded with carnage, abhorred by his subjects, on whom he had brought such calamities, and pitied even by those whose rashness had been the occasion of them. The emperor lamented the fatal accident which had stained the lustre of his victory ; and amidst such a scene of horror there was but one spectacle that afforded him any satisfaction. Ten thousand Christian slaves, among whom were several persons of distinction, met him as he entered the town, and, falling on their knees, thanked and blessed him as their deliverer. At the same time that Charles accomplished his pro- mise to the Moorish king of re-establishing him in his dominions, he did not neglect what was necessary for bridling the power of the African corsairs, for the security of his own subjects, and for the interest of the Spanish crown. In order to gain these ends, he con- cluded a treaty with Muley-Hascen on the following conditions : That he should hold the kingdom of Tunis in fee of the crown of Spain, and do homage to the emperor as his liege-lord ; that all the Christian slaves now within his dominions, of whatever nation, should be set at liberty without ransom; that no subject of the emperor's should for the future be detained in ser- vitude ; that no Turkish corsair should be admitted into the ports of his dominions; that free trade, together with the public exercise of the Christian religion, should be allowed to all the emperor's subjects ; that the emperor should not only retain the Goletta, but that all the other sea-ports in the kingdom which were fortified should be put into his hands; that Muley- BOOK v.] EMPEROR CHARLES THE FIFTH. 657 Hascen should pay annually twelve thousand crowns for the subsistence of the Spanish garrison in the Goletta ; that he should enter into no alliance with any of the emperor's enemies, and should present to him every year, as an acknowledgment of his vassalage, six Moorish horses, and as many hawks. 67 Having thus settled the affairs of Africa, chastised the insolence of the corsairs, secured a safe retreat for the ships of his subjects, and a proper station to his own fleets, on that coast from which he was most infested by piratical depredations, Charles embarked again for Europe, the tempestuous weather and sickness among his troops not permitting him to pursue Barbarossa. 68 By this expedition, the merit of which seems to have been estimated in that age rather by the apparent generosity of the undertaking, the magnificence where- with it was conducted, and the success which crowned it, than by the importance of the consequences that attended it, the emperor attained a greater height of glory than at any other period of his reign. Twenty thousand slaves whom he freed from bondage either by his arms or by his treaty with Muley-Hascen, 69 each of whom he clothed and furnished with the means of returning to their respective countries, spread all over Europe the fame of their benefactor's munificence, extolling his power and abilities with the exaggeration flowing from gratitude and admiration. In comparison with him, the other monarchs of Europe made an incon- siderable figure. They seemed to be solicitous about ''" Du Mont, Corps Diplomat, ii de Malthe. Epistres des Princes, 128. Summonte. Hist, di Napoli, par Ruscelli, traduites par Belle iv. 89. forest, pp. 119, 120, etc. Anton. 68 Jok Etropii Diarium Expedi- Pontii Consentiui Hist. Belli adr. tion. Tunetanse, ap. Scard., voL ii Barbar., ap. Mattbaji Analecta. p. 320, etc. -Jovii Histor., lib. Gl Summonte, Hist di Mapolf, ixiiv. 153, etc. Sandoval, ii 164, voL iv. p. 103. etc. Vertot, Hist, des Chevaliers VOL. I. U U REIGN OF CHARLES THE FLbTH. BOOK v. nothing but their private and particular interest ; while Charles, with an elevation of sentiment which became the chief prince in Christendom, appeared to be con- cerned for the honour of the Christian name and attentive to the public security and welfare. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY Los Angeles This book is DUE on the last date stamped below. JREC'D LD-URL EB151S68 Form L9-Series 444 A 000 061 897