JUDAISM AND CHRISTIANITY
 
 A SKETCH 
 
 OF 
 
 THE PROGRESS OF THOUGHT FROM OLD 
 TESTAMENT TO NEW TESTAMENT 
 
 BY 
 
 CRAWFORD HOWELL TOY 
 
 PBOFESSOR IX HARVARD UNIVERSITY 
 
 LONDON 
 
 SAMPSON LOW, MARSTON, SEARLE, & RIVINGTON 
 (LIMITED) 
 
 1890
 
 UNIVERSITY PRESS: 
 JOHX WILSON AND SON, CAMBRIDGE, U.S A.
 
 'T^HE present volume was begun as a continuation 
 of my " Quotations in the New Testament," 
 with the purpose of giving an orderly view of the 
 development of religious thought apparent in the 
 way in which Old Testament passages are inter- 
 preted and used by New Testament writers. On 
 further consideration of the subject, however, I 
 came to the conclusion that this end would be 
 better gained by a general historical survey of the 
 period reaching from the distinct legal organiza- 
 tion of the Jewish people to the close of the New 
 Testament Canon. In so large a field I have been 
 obliged to confine myself to the discussion of gen- 
 eral ethical-religious ideas, omitting many details 
 which might properly have been introduced but for 
 lack of space ; and this condensation will not be 
 without advantage if it helps to secure clearness of 
 outline without the sacrifice of anything essential to 
 the discussion. For the same reason namely, lack 
 of space I have not gone into full critical exami- 
 nation of the Biblical and Apocryphal books which
 
 vi PREFACE. 
 
 have furnished the material for my discussion, but 
 have contented myself with brief indications of 
 the grounds of my chronological classification. For 
 details on this point I refer to the well-known 
 works of Reuss, Kuenen, Stade, Weiss, Meyer, and 
 others. I felt doubtful about inserting so meagre 
 an outline as I have given of the subject of the 
 Introduction, a subject that richly deserves a 
 separate treatise ; but on the whole it seemed 
 better to treat it even very briefly than to 
 omit it altogether. Among works bearing on 
 this subject may be mentioned Bagehot's " Physics 
 and Politics," Kuenen's " National Religions and 
 Universal Religions, " and W. Robertson Smith's 
 " Religion of the Semites." 
 
 I need hardly sny that I do not claim absolute 
 correctness for my results. In the treatment of so 
 long a period of history, for the construction of 
 which the data are sometimes lacking and often 
 uncertain, one can hope only for an approximation 
 to the truth, and I shall be grateful for any criti- 
 cisms which may lead to a correcter or completer 
 interpretation of the facts. 
 
 C. II. T. 
 
 CAMBRIDGE, MASS., 
 
 October, 1890.
 
 TABLE OF CONTENTS. 
 
 INTRODUCTION. 
 
 PAGE 
 
 ON THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE ADVANCE FROM NATIONAL TO 
 
 UNIVERSAL RELIGIONS 1-46 
 
 I. THE SOCIAL BASIS OF RELIGION 1-6 
 
 1. SOCIAL CHARACTER OF RELIGION 1, 2 
 
 1. Religion a product of human thought, 1. 2. Con- 
 tent of the religious consciousness, 2. 
 
 2. GROWTH OF SOCIETY 2-6 
 
 1. General laws of growth, arrest, retrogression, and 
 decay, 2, 3. 2. Application of these laws to 
 society, 3, 4. 3. Relation of size of commu- 
 nity to law of growth, 4, 5. 4. Religion sub- 
 ject to the laws of social growth, 5, 6. 
 
 II. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF RELIGIOUS PROGRESS 6-39 
 
 1. FORMATION OF COMMUNITIES . 7-11 
 
 1. Organized social life the condition of the devel- 
 opment of a religion, ?-9. 2. Nations formed 
 by combinations of smaller communities, and na- 
 tional religions by aggregation of tribal faiths, 
 9-11. 
 
 2. INTERNAL DEVELOPMENT OF IDEAS 11-21 
 
 1. Constant refashioning of religious ideas in a grow- 
 ing community, 11, 12. 2. Interaction between 
 the different elements of social thought ; influ- 
 ence of art and politics on religion,"l2, 13. 
 3. Religion modified and developed by science, 
 14-16. 4. Religion and ethics, their indepen- 
 dent developments and mutual influence, 16-20. 
 5. Content of the religious sentiment deter- 
 mined by science and ethics, 20, 21. 
 
 3. GREAT MEN 21-26 
 
 1. Great men a necessity in social progress, 21, 22. 
 
 2. They are the product of their times, 22, 23. 
 
 3. There is something inexplicable in them, 23,
 
 viii CONTENTS. 
 
 PAGE 
 
 24. 4. They give a new unity to thought and 
 society, 24, 25. 5. The part they have played 
 in the establishment of religious, 23, 20. 
 
 4. EXTERNAL CONDITIONS 20-30 
 
 1. The extent of the religious influence exerted by one 
 nation on another depends in part on closeness of 
 intercourse, 20, 27. 2. Such influence recipro- 
 cal, and the more developed the religious culture 
 the greater its influence, 27, 28. 3. Effect of ex- 
 citement of thought, 28. 4. Borrowing of ideas 
 is direct or indirect, conscious or unconscious, 
 28, 29. 5. It is determined by a nation's ca- 
 pacity for assimilation, 29, 30. 
 
 5. THE GENERAL LINES OF PROGRESS 30-30 
 
 1. Abandonment of local usages, 30-32. 2. Broaden- 
 ing of ideas, 32. 3. Selection of a new idea as 
 basis of organization, 32-34. 4. Response to 
 the demands of the times, 34, 35. 5. An abso- 
 lutely universal religion has not yet appeared, 
 35, 30. 
 
 6. EXTRA-NATIONAL EXTENSION 30-39 
 
 1. There is necessary an idea broader than national 
 areas, "30, 37. 2. There must be a wide social 
 unity, 37. 3. And religious emptiness in the 
 areas conquered, 37, 3S. 4. The conquering 
 religion must offer what is needed, 38, 39. 
 
 III. THE ACTUAL HISTORICAL RESULTS 39-46 
 
 1. THE UNIVERSAL RELIGIONS 39, 40 
 
 Conditions to be fulfilled numerous. Number of uni- 
 versal religions small. Rise of Buddhism, Chris- 
 tianity, and Islam. 
 
 2. STUNTED AND ARRESTED GROWTHS 40-41 
 
 1. Stoicism and other philosophical systems, their lack 
 of theological framework, 41, 42. 2. Confu- 
 cianism. 3. The old Egyptian religion, bound 
 to the soil. Mazdeism, its lack of clearness, 
 
 42, 43. 4. National and international churches, 
 
 43, 44. 
 
 3. NATIONAL AND TRIBAL RELIGIONS 44 
 
 Inertness of the great mass of the religions of the 
 world. 
 
 4. THE OUTLOOK 44-46 
 
 1. Signs that a few great religions will in time control 
 the world, 44, 45. 2. Superiority of Christian- 
 ity, 45. 3. Improbable that other religions will 
 survive as systems, 45. 4. Probable modifica- 
 tion of Christianity in the future, 45, 46.
 
 CONTENTS. 
 
 JUDAISM AND CHRISTIANITY. 
 
 PAGE 
 
 RESULTS OF ISRAELITISH THOUGHT UP TO EZRA'S TIME . . . 47-51 
 Practical Monotheism. Sound system of practical social ethics. 
 Organization of public worship. Messianic hope. 
 
 CHAPTER I. 
 
 THE LITERATURE .............. 52-76 
 
 1. THE LITERARY DEVELOPMENT ......... 52-68 
 
 1. Prophetic writings. Decline of prophecy, 53. Malachi 
 
 ritualistic, 53. Zechariah and Joel predict the revi- 
 val of nationality, 54. 
 
 2. Rewriting of history from the ritualistic point of view : 
 
 Chronicles, Ezra, Nehemiah, 55. 
 
 3. Chronicles; its embellishments. The romances: Jonah, 
 
 Esther, Judith, Tobit. 55-58. 
 
 4. Wisdom-books ; their practical character. Proverbs. 
 
 Ecclesiastes ; its philosophical scepticism. Wisdom 
 of Solomon ; its Platonic and Stoic elements. Wisdom 
 of the Son of Sirach ; its Jewish tone. 58-60. 
 
 5. Liturgical literature. The book of Psalms. Enig- 
 
 matical character of the Song of Songs. 61, 62. 
 
 6. Apocalypses; their origin and form. Daniel. Enoch. 
 
 Sibylline Oracles. Baruch. Assumption of Moses. 
 Psalter of Solomon. Book of Jubilees. Second 
 Esdras. 62-67. 
 
 7. Historical and theological works. Maccabees. Jo- 
 
 sephus. Philo. 67, 68. 
 2. THE CANONS ............... 68-76 
 
 1. Origin of the canonical idea. 68, 69. 
 
 2. Beginning of canonization. The Tora or Law, its his- 
 
 torical development. 69-71. 
 
 3. The second or prophetic canon. 71-73. 
 
 4. The third or non-prophetic canon, the grounds of choice 
 
 of its content. Palestinian and Alexandrian canons. 
 Uncanonized books. 73-76. 
 
 CHAPTER II. 
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD ........... 77-140 
 
 The monotheistic idea firmly established in fifth century B. c., 
 but not theoretically complete. Elements of the theistic 
 conception. 77, 78.
 
 CONTENTS. 
 
 PAGE 
 
 1. Governmental side: supremacy of God, his providential 
 
 care for men, and for inanimate and brute nature ; his 
 special relation to Israel ; his justice, how defined by theo- 
 logical theories in O. T. and N. T. 78-83. 
 
 2. Love as a divine attribute, historical growth of the con- 
 
 ception ; Greek influence. 83-86. 
 
 3. Spiritual relation of God to the individual man ; conception 
 
 of God as pure spirit. 86-89. 
 
 4. Hypostatic differences in the divine nature. 89-121. 
 
 Hypostatizing tendency in 0. T. : angel of the pres- 
 ence ; angel of the name ; angel of Yahwe. 90, 91. 
 
 Hypostatical development of spirit, 92-96 ; of wisdom, 
 96-103 ; of word : Philo, N. T., 103-121. 
 
 5. Relation of God's self-manifestation to natural law; N. T. 
 
 miracles. 121-127- 
 
 6. Authority of the Scriptures : inspiration ; attitude of N. T. 
 
 writers toward 0. T. ; Jewish critical methods ; use of 
 0. T. in N. T. ; quotations. 127-140. 
 
 CHAPTER III. 
 
 SUBORDINATE SUPERNATURAL BEINGS . . ; . . 141-172 
 
 1. Survivals from early animistic beliefs : teraphirn ; demons ; 
 
 magic; Azazel. 141-144. 
 
 2. Spirits, their origin; their subordination to God. 144- 
 
 146. 
 
 3. Angels, their origin ; historical development ; Persian in- 
 
 fluence; position in N. T. 146-154. 
 
 4. Evil spirits : Satan ; his appearance in O. T. and apocryphal 
 
 books ; his role as tempter. Fallen angels. Leviathan, 
 Behemoth, Rahab. The Satan of N. T. Origin of the 
 figure of Satan ; later Persian influence. Historical devel- 
 opment of evil spirits ; demoniacal possession. 154-172. 
 
 CHAPTER IV. 
 
 MAN. 173-290 
 
 1. Constitution of man: body and soul. O. T. use of terms 
 
 body, soul, spirit, heart, reins. N. T. use of body, flesh, 
 heart, spirit, mind. Not a trichotomy. 173-182. 
 
 2. Nature and origin of sin. 183-220. 
 
 O. T. conception of sin ; general development of the 
 idea. Two elements of consciousness of sin. Historical 
 development: period of Judges and David; of pre-exilian
 
 CONTENTS. XI 
 
 PAGE 
 
 prophets ; of Jeremiah ; of the Levitical law ; of the Book 
 of Psalms. Consciousness of righteousness. Gradual deep- 
 ening of the sense of sin. 183-193. 
 
 O. T. view of origin of sin. Its reticence. Narrative 
 in Gen. iii., its date; its design; assumes human incli- 
 nation to sin. The serpent in the narrative, a rational 
 beast ; probably mythical in origin ; identified with Satan, 
 not iii O. T., but in Wisdom of Solomon. The narrative 
 iii Genesis not an allegory. Its representation of death. 
 193-205. 
 
 Conception of sin in apocryphal books and Philo. 205, 
 206. 
 
 N. T. representation of sin; its practical interest pro- 
 duces reticence as to questions of origin of sin and of con- 
 sequences of Adam's transgression ; Paul's treatment of 
 this last point ; role assigned to the woman. 206-211. 
 
 N. T. view of corruption of human nature : Synoptic 
 Gospels, James, Pastoral Epistles, Paul, Ephesians and Co- 
 lossians, Fourth Gospel. No gnostic asceticism. 211-220. 
 
 3. Removal of sin. 220-233. 
 
 Prophetic view of expiation. Sin atoned for by the sin- 
 ner's suffering. Vicarious human suffering : origin of the 
 idea; its treatment by the exilian Isaiah. 220-225. 
 
 Formulation of idea of ceremonial atonement in the 
 Law ; its restricted character. 225-227- 
 
 Appeal to the mercy of God. Human mediation for 
 sin. Negative attitude of prophets toward sacrificial ritual. 
 227-231. 
 
 Teaching of the extra-canonical books. 231. 
 
 Point of view of Jesus that of the pre-exilian prophets 
 spiritualized. The early disciples. Paul's conception of 
 the sacrificial nature of the Messiah's death. 231-233. 
 
 4. 0. T. conception of righteousness. 233-246. 
 
 0. T. conception of moral goodness : prophetic standard ; 
 Deuteronomy ; the " new heart ; " two tendencies ; idea of 
 inward purity in the Psalms. Twofold view of the source 
 of righteousness : man's will and God's help. 233-237. 
 
 Nomism. Introduction of the complete Law. Inter- 
 nal and external causes of the Jewish nomistic organiza- 
 tion. Strength and weakness of nomism : precision of 
 religious life ; pride ; externalism ; casuistry ; depression 
 of spirituality. General moral influence of the nomistic 
 system in Judaism and in Christianity. 237-246. 
 
 5. Succeeding development of the idea of righteousness. 246- 
 
 266. 
 
 Synagogues; their origin and influence. 246-248. 
 Parties. Tendencies formulated in the Greek period.
 
 xii CONTENTS. 
 
 PAGI 
 
 The Pharisees, their origin; representatives of broader 
 nationalism; acceptance of new doctrines; possible Greek 
 influence. The Sadducees ; their origin, beliefs, and influ- 
 ence. The Essenes, their peculiarities ; their effect on 
 the general Jewish life ; traces of the party in the N. T. 
 The Zealots. 243-258. 
 
 The Sanhedriii. The legal schools ; greatness of their 
 influence. Sayings of Simon and Antigonus ; Stoic influ- 
 ence. Rivalry between Pharisees and Sadducees repre- 
 sents in one aspect the struggle between progressive 
 uomism and conservative nationalism, in another aspect 
 the conflict between Jewish and foreign ideas. Hellenism, 
 though it could not crush the Jewish religion, impressed 
 itself on Jewish thought. Illustrations from the teaching 
 of the lawyers, especially Hillel and Shammai. Religious 
 breadth of Hillel. 238-266. 
 6. N. T. conception of righteousness. 266-290. 
 
 Teaching of Jesns : he recognized the Law ; spiritual 
 character of his nomism ; source of righteousness in the 
 soul itself. The early Church, stress laid on sincerity 
 rather than on spirituality; relation of Jesus to man's 
 righteousness scarcely touched on. 266-271. 
 
 Paul's doctrine of imputed righteousness, recom- 
 mended to him by his own experience ; not alien to the 
 thought of the time. O. T. basis of the doctrine ; applica- 
 tion to Jesus suggested by Paul's high conception of the 
 functions of the Messiah. Paul's doctrine of faith. 271- 
 275. 
 
 Opposition to Paul's apparent antinomianism. His re- 
 ply brings out the spiritual side of his idea : disappearance 
 of desire to sin ; faith not merely intellectual belief ; appeal 
 to the power of an ideal ; indwelling of God in the soul ; 
 the deatli of Christ the condition of salvation. Summing 
 up of Paul's doctrine. 275-281. 
 
 Subsequent history of the idea of righteousness in the 
 N. T.: Ephesians, Colossians, and First Peter substantially 
 Pauline ; 0. T. point of view in Hebrews ; universality of 
 First Timothy ; Pauline tone of Second Timothy and Titus ; 
 in the Fourth Gospel and First John righteousness is a 
 divinely created light-nature. Three conceptions in N. T. 
 idea of righteousness : personal goodness, imputed good- 
 ness, transformation of soul. 2S1-285. 
 
 The insufficiency of the Jewish national nomism. Effect 
 of the teaching of Jesus, and of the systems of Paul and the 
 Fourth Gospel. Later history of Jewish nomism. Min- 
 gling of nomistic and antinomistic elements in Judaism and 
 in Christianity. 286-289.
 
 CONTENTS. xiii 
 
 PAGE 
 
 Contrast between the outward method of attaining 
 righteousness through a vicarious sacrifice, and the in- 
 ward method of transformation of soul. 290. 
 
 CHAPTER V. 
 
 ETHICS . 291-302 
 
 Ethical discussion in the Bible practical, not philosophical. 291, 
 292. 
 
 1. Jewish moral coda of 5th century B. c. purely national. 
 
 292, 293. 
 
 2. Greek period. Broader ethical tone of Wisdom-books. 
 
 293, 294. 
 
 3. Ethics of Jesus; its religious sanctions. The golden rule. 
 
 294-297. 
 
 4. Ethics of the Epistles. Attitude toward unbelievers. Cos- 
 
 mopolitan tendency. 297, 298. 
 
 5. Biblical view of the aim of life. Egoism. Ethical defect of 
 
 N. T. speculative rather than practical. 298-300. 
 
 6. Distinctive spirit of N. T. ethics. Ethical power of the 
 
 Church. Influence of Christianity on the ethical life of 
 the world. 300-302. 
 
 CHAPTER VI. 
 
 THE KINGDOM OF GOD . 303-371 
 
 The conception of the kingdom of God a characteristic of 
 Jewish thought ; its four stadia, The Jewish national hope ; 
 its origin in Jewish power of persistence and of religious 
 organization. The idea of a national covenant with God ; 
 its growth and its consequences. The history of the na- 
 tional hope is the history of the national thought. SOS- 
 SOS. 
 
 1. The pre-prophetic, non-ethical period ; its preparatory char- 
 
 acter. 308, 309. 
 
 2. The pre-exilian and exilian prophetic period. Hope of 
 
 political and moral-religious prosperity in Amos, Hosea, 
 Isaiah, Micah, Nairn m, Zephaniah, Habakkuk, Jeremiah, 
 Ezekiel, the exilian Isaiah, Mic. vii., Dent, xxvhi.-xxx., 1 
 Kings viii. 309-312. 
 
 3. The post-exilian prophetic period. Ritual tinge in Haggai, 
 
 Zechariah, Malachi. Cosmopolitan spirit of Isa. ii. 2-4, 
 xix. 18-25. 312-314. 
 
 4. Legal period. Joel, the second Zechariah. The king as 
 
 national deliverer, in Ezekiel, Jer. xxxiii., 2 Sam. vii.,
 
 xiv CONTENTS. 
 
 PAGE 
 
 Zech. vi., Mic. v. 2-6, Isa. xi. 1-9, ix. 6, 7, Zech. ix. 9. 
 This prophetic national hope traceable in the later litera- 
 ture down to the beginning of our era. 314-319. 
 
 5. Greek and Roman period. Desire for deliverance intensi- 
 
 fied by national suffering. Apocalyptic works : the national 
 future in the early Maccabean period (Daniel, Sibylline 
 Oracles, Enoch); in the Roman period (Psalter of Solo- 
 mon, Sibylline Oracles, Enoch-Parables) ; in later literature 
 (Assumption of Moses, Jubilees, Philo). Moral progress 
 visible in non-apocalyptic writings. Summing up of Mes- 
 sianic material in pre-Christian literature. Condition of 
 membership in the new community. Other points of 
 popular belief mentioned in N. T. Deep Messianic feeling 
 . in Palestine at beginning of first century of our era. 
 319-331. 
 
 6. Profounder view of the political-religious situation at be- 
 
 ginning of first century, weakening of desire for politi- 
 cal sovereignty ; recognition of necessity for moral re- 
 form. Appearance of John the Baptist, his prophetic 
 character ; nature of his reform. Desire for reform felt 
 throughout the Graeco-Roman world. Peculiarity and 
 advantage of the Jewish reform-movement of this period. 
 331-339. 
 
 Work of Jesus. He begins apparently as disciple of John. 
 Moral-spiritual character of his movement, it was the 
 summing-up of O. T. and N. T. His teaching stands 
 apart from the current political and ecclesiastical Messi- 
 anic ideas of the time : stress laid by him on moral- 
 spiritual side of the kingdom of God ; the public entry 
 into Jerusalem ; he was looked on as politically unimpor- 
 tant by Roman and Jewish authorities ; doubtful whether 
 he intended his teaching to be limited to the Jews ; con- 
 flicting nature of the testimony ; he attempted no separate 
 organization of his disciples. 339-350. 
 
 His conception of the outcome of his movement. First, 
 did lie regard himself as the promised Messiah ? The 
 incident at Caesarca Philippi. How he looked on his own 
 death. Conception of his mission suggested by the title 
 " Son of Man." 350-355. 
 
 His idea of the destiny of the world. Representation in 
 the Synoptics that he would come in person to hold a 
 final judgment. Facts going to show that he held such 
 a view. Facts opposed to such a supposition. His moral 
 power independent of his opinions on this point. The es- 
 cliatological discourses in the Synoptics. 355-302. 
 
 Christian conception of the kingdom of God in the first 
 century : James, 2 Thessalouiaus, 1 Corinthians. Gradual
 
 CONTENTS. XV 
 
 PAGE 
 
 disappearance of the old Israelitisk conception. Attempts 
 
 to define the time of the second coining of Christ. De- 
 struction of Jerusalem looked on as turning-point. Over- 
 throw of the Roman empire regarded as necessary. Repre- 
 sentation in the N. T. Apocalypse; in 2 Thessalonians. 
 362-366. 
 
 Outward organization of the Church ; change ill the 
 principle of membership introduced by Paul. Paul's 
 creative dogmatic work. Dogma inevitable ; its unspirit- 
 ual influence. Christianity the fusion of two great masses 
 of human thought ; how far it achieved unity in the world. 
 366-371. 
 
 CHAPTER VII. 
 
 ESCHATOLOGY 372-414 
 
 Value and interest of eschatological ideas. 372. 
 
 1. Final form of earthly kingdom of God in N. T. Apocalypse. 
 
 Its sources: Ezekiel, Isaiah, Enoch. Origin of the con- 
 ception of two judgments. Whether Persian influence is 
 recognizable. The details belong to the thought of the 
 times ; the Jewish idea adopted by Christianity, but grad- 
 ually modified. Its moral influence. The Church's con- 
 ception of the reign of Christ. 373-377. 
 
 2. The doctrine of immortality. O. T. idea of the future life. 
 
 Decline of necromancy ; indifference of the shades. O. T. 
 passages supposed to teach immortality. O. T. idea of 
 the other life belongs to the old-Semitic conception ; this 
 perhaps explicable from the character of the Semitic mind. 
 Whether the rise of the Jewish belief in immortality can 
 be referred to the growth of spiritual feeling ; first dis- 
 tinct statement of the belief is found in Wisdom of Solo- 
 mon ; contrast between this book and Ecclesiastes and 
 Ecclesiasticus ; probable Alexandrian Jewish-Greek origin 
 'of the doctrine. 377-388. 
 
 3. The doctrine of resurrection. Examination of O. T. pas- 
 
 sages supposed to teach it. Egyptian and Hindu ideas. 
 Persian doctrine; probably adopted in modified form by 
 the Jews ; they held at first to a partial, afterward to a 
 general resurrection. How far the belief in a general resur- 
 rection prevailed in the Church of the first century. 388- 
 395. 
 
 4. The doctrine of a final judgment. Idea of divine retribution 
 
 universal. Its progress along three lines : (1) ethical ; 
 (2) from individualism to nationalism ; (3) from conception 
 of earthly to that of extra-earthly judgment : the Jewish
 
 xvi CONTENTS. 
 
 PAGE 
 
 idea of an earthly judgment of all nations by Yahwe modi- 
 fied by the introduction of two articles of faith, the expec- 
 tation of ft personal Messiah and the belief in immortality. 
 Assignment of office of judge to Messiah in Enoch-Para- 
 bles and N. T. ; origin of this idealization, whether 
 Christian. Immortality in connection with judgment in 
 Enoch-Parables and N. T. ; double sense of the expres- 
 sions "this age" and "the age to come." Christianity, 
 in accepting the doctrine of judgment from Judaism, sub- 
 stituted the Church for the nation. 395-404. 
 5. Reconstruction of the doctrine of the future life. Rep- 
 resentation in O. T. and Enoch. Origin of Jewish 
 conception of rewards and punishments after death. Rep- 
 resentation of future punishment in N. T. Duration of 
 punishment in N. T. The future abode of the righteous : 
 the earth and the new Jerusalem ; the Eden garden of 
 Genesis ; paradise ; heaven. Condition of men between 
 death and judgment, in Enoch and N. T. ; annihilation ; 
 future probation. Idea of moral probation in the Bible 
 modified by that of final judgment. 404-413. 
 
 Christian idea of the kingdom of God drawn from 
 diverse parts of the Western world. The triumph of the 
 Church was the essence of Christian eschatology. Strenu- 
 ous ethical basis of the Jewish-Christian conception of the 
 kingdom of God. 413-414. 
 
 CHAPTER VIII. 
 
 RELATION OF JESUS TO CHRISTIANITY .... 415-435 
 Outline of the preceding sketch of the transformation of Juda- 
 ism into Christianity. What is the relation of Jesus to 
 this movement ? 415,416. 
 
 1. He announced the germinal principles of Chris! ianity. The 
 
 spiritual basis of his teaching. Significance of his silence : 
 he added nothing to the existing idea of immortality ; 
 whether he represented himself as a sacrifice for sin ; 
 whether he taught the dogma of imputed righteousness ; 
 whether he regarded himself as superhuman. 416-423. 
 
 2. The result of his teaching. Did it alone create the Church, 
 
 or was it modified by his followers ? And if it was so 
 modified, what was his relation to the new ideas ? The 
 creed of the infant Church was belief in Jesus as the Mes- 
 siah. Whether there is sign of dogmatic reconstruction 
 in the earliest Christian records. Concurrence of favor- 
 able conditions at the birth of Christianity. The early 
 Church the creation of Jesus. 423-427.
 
 CONTENTS. xvii 
 
 PAGE 
 
 3. Paul ; his dogmatic system 1 he result of his conception of 
 
 Jesus. How the Church came to interpret the death of 
 Christ as sacrificial. The exaltation of Jesus ; distin- 
 guished from deification. The conception of Christ's right- 
 eousness as legally justifying. 427-431. 
 
 4. The logos-doctrine, in Hebrews, Ephesians, Colossians, 
 
 Fourth Gospel. 431-433. 
 
 The variety of the portraitures of Jesus an indication of 
 his power ; he is always the centre of life and belief ; the 
 Church his creation directly or indirectly ; his place in the 
 succeeding history of the Church. 433-435. 
 
 INDEX or CITATIONS 437 
 
 INDEX OF SUBJECTS . . . 445
 
 INTRODUCTION. 
 
 ON THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE ADVANCE FROM 
 NATIONAL TO UNIVERSAL RELIGIONS. 
 
 I. 
 
 THE rise of Christianity out of Judaism is a fact which, 
 though of enormous significance, is yet in conformity 
 with a well-defined law of human progress. The recognition 
 of this law is so important for the proper understanding of 
 these two religions that it will be not out of place to attempt 
 a brief sketch of its working before entering on our main 
 subject. We may begin by pointing out the social basis 
 of religion, and then go on to examine the conditions which 
 determine its advance from lower to higher stages. 
 
 1. SOCIAL CHARACTER OF EELIGION. 
 
 1. Eeligion must be treated as a product of human 
 thought. For supposing a supernatural intervention for 
 the communication of truth, it must, in order to be success- 
 ful, conform to human conditions, and have a real genesis in 
 man's mind. And as human thought is developed only in 
 and through society, religion (like language and ethics) may 
 be regarded as a branch of sociology, subject to all the laws 
 that control general human progress. 
 
 2. A religious consciousness may be spoken of as we 
 may speak of a moral, a literary, or a scientific conscious- 
 ness ; these expressions imply not separate faculties of the 
 mind, but merely the ordinary mental activity applied to 
 
 1
 
 2 INTRODUCTION. 
 
 particular classes of objects. The content of what we call 
 the religious consciousness is twofold, the idea of God ; and 
 the conviction that man needs and may obtain the help of 
 God. Each of these elements is the product of reflection. 
 The belief in God rests on the recognition of a non-human, 
 super-human power in the phenomena of outward nature and 
 human life. The desire to secure God's help springs from 
 man's feeling that he is in the midst of an environment 
 which is beyond his control, at the mercy of elements and 
 beasts, disease and circumstances. How he construes these 
 two facts, what comes out of them for his weal or woe, 
 this is a part of his social history. His thought, which keeps 
 pace, or rather is identical, with his social organization, 
 occupies itself with all the problems of life ; and none of 
 these is more important for him than the question of his 
 relation to the mysterious, invisible power which he believes 
 to stand behind all phenomena. Eeligion must grow as 
 society grows. 
 
 2. THE GROWTH OF SOCIETY. 
 
 1. The general law of natural growth is modified by other 
 laws of arrest, retrogression, and decay. Plants and animals 
 have their laws of increase against which they seem to be 
 powerless. The human body, as a whole and in all its parts, 
 reaches, after a time, a point beyond which it cannot advance, 
 and the human soul appears to have equally definite boun- 
 daries marked out for it. Nature seems to have stamped 
 on all living things this tendency toward a condition of 
 equilibrium in which the supply of force is just equal to the 
 waste, the powers of the organism just suffice to make head 
 against external retarding and destructive influences. Does 
 this law hold of communities as well as of individuals ? 
 Certainly there are a number of cases in which it seems 
 to show itself, savage tribes, for example, which appear
 
 THE GROWTH OF SOCIETY. 3 
 
 not to have made any social advance from time immemorial ; 
 and of the greater communities, China is often cited as an 
 example of stagnation. But it need hardly be said that 
 great caution is necessary in such affirmations. It is very 
 doubtful whether the term " arrest of growth " can be used 
 of China in any proper sense ; and as for the savage tribes 
 of the world, we are in a state of dense ignorance of their 
 history. Social stagnation is perfectly conceivable : a com- 
 munity like the Fuegans, for instance, may reach a point 
 of content where there is not sufficient inducement to make 
 inroads upon the natural environment ; but whether this is 
 actually the case we do not know. We may leave the ques- 
 tion undecided whether there is any community which has 
 reached the state of social equilibrium. 
 
 2. The same thing must be said of the natural law of 
 retrogression or decay as applied to the inward life of 
 societies. We may admit its possibility, but whether it is 
 to be recognized in any particular case is matter of special 
 examination. Certainly many historical examples are im- 
 properly cited to prove its existence. The great empires of 
 the Old World Egypt, Assyria, Babylonia, Persia, Greece, 
 Eome, and in later times the Califate and the Byzantine 
 Empire perished, not through internal moral-intellectual 
 decay, but by outward pressure. They fell apart through in- 
 sufficient political organization, and succumbed to the vio- 
 lence of stronger powers. In our own times the case of 
 Spain is instructive. She has fallen back from the relative 
 position she occupied in Europe in the sixteenth and seven- 
 teenth centuries ; she has made less advance than her neigh- 
 bors ; but she has really grown in all the elements of the best 
 national life. Christianity did not undergo a decay or retro- 
 gression in the Middle Age; its ethical-religious principles 
 passed over from civilized Greeks and Eomans to groups of 
 barbarian tribes which, at first incapable of grasping them,
 
 4 INTRODUCTION. 
 
 nevertheless entered on a career of steady growth. Seeming 
 decay is sometimes only a form of growth. An organism 
 rids itself of some part in order to substitute for it a higher 
 form. A growing society is constantly changing its institu- 
 tions; the institutions decay, the society lives. Medieval 
 chivalry and monarchy, though no doubt admirable in their 
 day, have given way to something better. The transition 
 from the old to the new may be attended with evil : steam 
 takes the place of human labor, and thousands of people 
 suffer till society has accommodated itself to the new arrange- 
 ment ; the rule of the few is succeeded by that of the many, 
 which brings with it a host of inconveniences and corrup- 
 tions till the community has been trained to use its powers 
 aright. In all these cases we have to await the result before 
 deciding whether the new scheme means growth or decay. 
 
 3. Other things being equal, the larger the community, the 
 more assured is its continuity and duration of growth. This 
 results from the fact that the larger social life calls into 
 being a greater moral- intellectual force ; and it is this which 
 furnishes the best safeguard against disintegrating influences. 
 In a large community the elements of life are more numer- 
 ous, their interactions more frequent, each is developed with 
 more completeness, and is more thoroughly and beneficially 
 affected by the others ; just as the more thoroughly devel- 
 oped a man's nature, the broader his sympathies, the com- 
 pleter the activity of each of his powers, the less likely he 
 is to succumb to hostile agencies, physical, intellectual, or 
 moral. The individual and the nation may perish by vio- 
 lence, but of the two the nation is less exposed to decay. It 
 renews its life by a succession of individuals, and if these 
 retain and increase the moral-intellectual power which comes 
 from high social organization, and if there intervene no phy- 
 sical attack from without or within, then we can hardly put 
 a limit to the duration of national life. In a modern nation
 
 THE GROWTH OF SOCIETY. 5 
 
 like England, we may be slow to predict dissolution from 
 internal decay ; her resources of physical food may disappear, 
 or her national existence may be crushed by wars, but so far 
 as her higher life is concerned, we may reasonably expect 
 that it will grow stronger rather than weaker. 
 
 4. Religion, as an element of social life, will be subject 
 to all these laws of social development. It will grow or 
 decline with the community in which it exists. The possi- 
 bility of religious stagnation, retrogression, and decay must 
 be allowed. Whether these have ever actually occurred, 
 must be decided by the examination of the facts in any 
 alleged case. Here, also, seeming decay may be a form of 
 growth. Judaism did not suffer by the destruction of the 
 temple, though it lost its apparatus of sacrifice. The Chris- 
 tianity of to-day is not inferior in vigor and purity to that 
 of the fourth century, though it has discarded many opinions 
 and practices of that period. Religion must be distinguished 
 from any particular organized form of religion. In the 
 bosom of a national church there may arise an impulse 
 which shall ultimately change its outward and inward con- 
 stitution ; and the new form may represent a truer and more 
 beneficent religion than the old. Ideas which seem to many 
 persons fundamental may vanish, and their adherents may 
 believe that an era of impiety has begun ; yet out of the 
 ruins of a shattered faith may spring another faith filled 
 with a higher spirit. 
 
 The larger the community, the more persistent and vigor- 
 ous the religion is likely to be. The recognition of religion 
 as a necessary element of life will not become feebler with 
 the intellectual and ethical growth, but the form of the 
 conception of it will be modified. The stress will be laid 
 on the rational spiritual side. So long as the community 
 exists, danger to religion can come only from its failure to 
 respond to man's deepest needs and highest desires. But
 
 6 INTRODUCTION. 
 
 there is no reason why it should fail to do this ; the natural 
 supposition is that religion will advance with the intellectual 
 life of the community, and come into possession of all its 
 elements of strength. The free individual life, with its di- 
 versities and complexities, will preserve religious thought 
 from onesidedness ; and the higher social organization which 
 always attends unfettered individuality will guard it against 
 unfruitful shapelessness and license. A small religious sect 
 is in danger of sinking into a useless narrowness from the 
 lack of broad intellectual excitement, and of perishing by 
 the gradual loss of individuals. Such a sect, by withdraw- 
 ing itself from the community, in so far diminishes the mass 
 of productive thought, and is obstructive and retardative. 
 This is an altogether different thing from the position of a 
 minority, like the Israelitish prophetic circle or that of 
 Luther and his friends, which really represents and ex- 
 pounds the deeper-lying thought of the community, and 
 thus paves the way to a higher and truer unity of thought. 
 It is in this way that all religious revolutions have been ac- 
 complished. The realness and the success of such move- 
 ments depend on the fidelity with which the profounder 
 thinkers interpret the instincts of the mass. The firmer 
 the organization of the community, the freer the intercourse 
 among its parts, the truer will be its feeling, and the more 
 certain the expression of it. A sect is injurious as rep- 
 resenting not simply individuality, but individuality cut 
 off from real intellectual communication with the mass of 
 the community. 
 
 II. 
 
 We come now to inquire into the general conditions under 
 which religious progress, so far as we can trace it in the 
 world, has been made. These conditions may be divided 
 into those which control the formation of nations, and those
 
 FORMATION OF COMMUNITIES. 7 
 
 which determine progress within the nation ; and these last 
 are either inward, springing naturally out of the community 
 itself, or outward, coming from foreign communities. Only 
 the more general laws can be touched on here, but the prin- 
 ciples on which they rest will apply as well to the smaller 
 religious bodies as to those great movements which have 
 issued in the formation of national and universal religions. 
 
 1. FORMATION OF COMMUNITIES. 
 
 1. A few words on this head will suffice. A large social 
 life, as has already been pointed out, is an essential condition 
 of the development of a great religion. It is only out of a 
 national organization that those large experiences spring 
 without which religious systems are narrow and unfruitful. 
 A religion in the better sense of the term is the organized 
 product of a national thought concerning man's relation to 
 the divine. The more mixed the nation, provided it has 
 reached true social-political unity, the broader and more 
 genial the religion is likely to be, and the greater its power 
 of commending itself to other communities. In general, the 
 religion is coextensive with the nation, or rather with the 
 people; if the latter is extinguished, the former perishes. 
 It is a misfortune, for example, for the comparative history 
 of the Semitic religions that the Assyrian and Babylonian 
 empires were destroyed by violence in so early a stage of 
 their career ; for with them perished their religion, and we 
 have no means of deciding, among other things, the ques- 
 tion whether it would have advanced sensibly toward prac- 
 tical monotheism. Similarly, the religions of the Hittites, 
 the Lydians, the Phoenicians, the Egyptians, have perished 
 with the nations to which they belonged ; while in Japan, 
 China, and India the maintenance of the national life has 
 preserved very ancient forms of religion.
 
 8 INTRODUCTION. 
 
 The continuance of a national-political organization is 
 not always necessary to the maintenance of its system of 
 religion. The essential thing is social organization, a real 
 unity of thought in a large mass of individuals; if this 
 exists, political independence may be destroyed, the people 
 may be driven from their land and become wanderers in the 
 world, and yet preserve their religion substantially intact. 
 Whether this can be effected will depend on the vigor of 
 character of the people, on the moral-intellectual elevation 
 of the religion as compared with that of other religious 
 systems with which the banished people are brought into 
 contact, and on the isolation in which they live. The most 
 striking case in point is that of the Jews. Driven from 
 their own land, and living in the midst of alien communi- 
 ties in Asia, Africa, Europe, and America, they have held 
 to the religion of their fathers with a very remarkable per- 
 tinacity, but only in so far as they have been socially iso- 
 lated. In the Middle Age, as inheritors of a religion which 
 represented centuries of thought and culture, they were de- 
 cidedly superior to their Moslem and Christian neighbors, 
 and above the temptation of being influenced by them ; and, 
 further, they were hated and persecuted, and forced into 
 social isolation. But so soon as they came into relation 
 with other communities and felt the influence of a thought 
 higher than their own, they yielded and modified their re- 
 ligion accordingly. Another though less striking example 
 is that of the Parsees, who have preserved the Mazdean 
 faith through twelve centuries of bondage and persecution. 
 Their position, however, differs from that of the Jews. A 
 foreign faith was forced on Persia ; Islam expelled Zoroas- 
 trianism, and the Persians are Mohammedans. The small 
 body which remained faithful to the old national religion 
 was compelled to leave its native land, and in India the 
 Parsees, isolated by their beliefs and practices, have main-
 
 FOKMATION OF COMMUNITIES. 9 
 
 tained their religion intact, but have at the same time held 
 themselves aloof from outside thought, and as a consequence 
 have sunk into almost complete stagnation. Neither me- 
 dieval Judaism nor Parseeism has had any real inward de- 
 velopment out of its own resources. Neither has impressed 
 itself sensibly on other communities ; both have held sub- 
 stantially (except under impulses from without) to the old 
 traditional faiths which they have worked up more or less 
 mechanically. 
 
 A community without national political organization is 
 thus exposed to the double danger of extinction and assimi- 
 lation. Its members perish and are with difficulty replaced ; 
 or under the influence of alien thought its religion is gradu- 
 ally, often insensibly, transformed till it ceases to have any- 
 thing but the name in common with its old self. And so, 
 while admitting a certain vitality in some politically unor- 
 ganized communities, we may recognize in history the gen- 
 eral rule that fruitful religions have arisen in societies 
 characterized by a true national life. And it is always pos- 
 sible that from such a national religion an idea may spring 
 so simple and broad that it shall commend itself to other 
 communities, and clothe itself with an organization which 
 ignores and transcends national lines. 
 
 2. In what has been said above, it is assumed that in any 
 regularly organized society there is a natural law of progress. 
 This is no doubt true of the society after it has received 
 definite shape ; but it must be borne in mind that its final 
 shape is usually the result of a process of aggregation. The 
 old genealogical scheme in which one ancestor, by natural 
 increase through a number of generations, becomes the father 
 of a great nation, is not in accordance with the testimony of 
 history. The composite character of the Hindu, Greek, 
 Latin, French, English, and other peoples is well known ; 
 and the Old Testament, which is concerned to derive the
 
 10 INTRODUCTION. 
 
 Israelitish nation from Jacob, yet gives us hints here and 
 there of the entrance of alien tribes and of a mixed nation- 
 ality. As far as we can trace the process, nations have 
 come into existence by successive combinations of small 
 communities, and national religions are aggregations of 
 tribal faiths. 
 
 Let us suppose that in several small communities dwelling 
 near one another, different though similar religious creeds have 
 grown up. Each community will have its scheme of deities 
 and worship, its vague conception of the relation between the 
 human and the divine. In process of time it may come to 
 pass that these communities shall be united by conquest or 
 otherwise. When a real social-political unity shall have 
 been established, a new faith will have come into existence, 
 comprising all the substantial elements of the old faiths, but 
 probably broader and truer than any one of them. Ideas 
 and customs will have been sifted and massed, the merely 
 local, the comparatively unimportant, rejected, and what re- 
 mains will be the religious material that commends itself to 
 the intelligence and feeling of the whole body of the result- 
 ant large community. This process may be repeated until 
 a nation arises whose thought-material will be the outcome 
 of a long process of experience and reflection, in which only 
 that will be retained which appeals to the presumably higher 
 intelligence and more serious needs of the larger community. 
 A well-known example of this process of religious aggrega- 
 tion is furnished by the pantheons of Egypt, Babylonia, and 
 Greece ; the number of parallel and duplicated deities is most 
 naturally explained as the result of the welding together of 
 different communities, and the combination of their religious 
 schemes into one system, in which, of course, divergencies 
 and discrepancies often show themselves. There are traces 
 of the same sort of syncretism in the Old Testament, in the 
 divine names, and perhaps elsewhere.
 
 THE INTERNAL DEVELOPMENT OF IDEAS. 11 
 
 The same process has been repeated on a larger scale in 
 the greater religious movements of the world. In Islam we 
 have a mixture of ideas from three sources, the Old Arabian 
 religion, the Jewish, and the Christian. Christianity has 
 blended with the religious and moral ideas of the New Testa- 
 ment much un-Jewish European thought. The Judaism of 
 the two or three centuries just preceding the beginning of 
 our era combined Hebrew and Greek conceptions. Wherever 
 there is intimate intellectual intercourse between nations, 
 this larger religious syncretism must follow. The stage of 
 unity of religious thought which modern Europe has reached 
 is the result of social assimilation ; and if the process of 
 assimilation goes on, we may hope for a constant progress 
 toward complete religious unity. We may go farther and 
 discern increasing points of contact in the more cultivated 
 religious thought of Europe and Asia. The early stages of 
 social-religious aggregation are thus the first step in a much 
 wider movement, which, under favorable conditions, may 
 issue in a religious unity that shall embrace the whole world, 
 and shall be broad and high in proportion to the mass of 
 thought which enters into it. 
 
 2. THE INTERNAL DEVELOPMENT OF IDEAS. 
 
 1. The nation being formed, and the conditions of its life 
 being such as to permit social progress, there will be first 
 within its own limits a constant elaboration and perfecting 
 of religious conceptions. Eeligion is so prominent and defi- 
 nite an element of social life that it will be the object of 
 constant reflection on the part of the community. Its funda- 
 mental ideas and its practices will shape themselves in ac- 
 cordance with the intellectual-moral status of the nation. 
 The religious system of the people will express its attempt 
 to construe the world in accordance with its highest in- 
 stincts ; the national thought will be forever reaching out
 
 12 INTRODUCTION. 
 
 after some better definition of the relation between "the 
 human and the divine. Old customs and ideas which have 
 become unsatisfactory will be modified or abandoned, and 
 new customs and ideas adopted. Each generation will re- 
 model in its own interests the material of its predecessors, 
 retaining what it can use, and fashioning the whole after 
 its highest ideal. If it retains and reverences old forms, it 
 will nevertheless interpret them in a new fashion. No com- 
 munity can really occupy a religious position which is in- 
 ferior to that of its intellectual-moral thought; inferior 
 religious ideas, even if they be nominally embraced, will 
 be practically dead. There will be an overlapping of the 
 new by the old, and temporary anachronisms and inconsis- 
 tencies, but these will be constantly yielding to the pressure 
 of thought, and the moulding power of the religious system 
 will reside in those general ideas of life which meet the needs 
 of the age. There will always be more or less of intellectual 
 confusion and disingenuousness ; at any particular moment 
 there will be a conflict in most men's minds between the con- 
 servative reverence for the past and the demands of the 
 present. At any given moment also, decided progress will 
 be visible only in the few ; the many will seem to be inert 
 and stationary. Nevertheless, a process of leavening goes on, 
 ideas make themselves felt ; and after a time it is seen that 
 a change has come over the spirit of the community, there 
 is a chasm between the men of the time and their fathers. 
 Whether this change will be for the better will depend on 
 the character of the general social progress, as to which we 
 must in each particular case decide in accordance with 
 historical fact. 
 
 2. In so far as the community is a unit, it will advance 
 as a whole, all its elements moving together, though not 
 necessarily developing to the same extent. Men's thoughts 
 are constantly occupied with all that concerns life ; they
 
 THE INTERNAL DEVELOPMENT OF IDEAS. 13 
 
 devote themselves with greatest assiduity and intensity to 
 what they think most important, but no phase of Life can 
 be judged to be altogether unimportant. Eeligion, social and 
 political organization, morals, art, and science must move 
 hand in hand. They all issue out of the same social life. 
 Each in a sort goes its independent way, yet each influences 
 and is influenced by the others. Examples of such influ- 
 ence readily occur to us, as the way in which art has been 
 affected by religion and by science. We are not here con- 
 cerned with the full discussion of these interactions, but 
 only with the question how far religion is affected by other 
 lines of social thought. What does it owe to politics, ethics, 
 art, and science ? 
 
 Besides its general quickening and developing effect on 
 thought, art has aided, by training the constructive imagi- 
 nation, in the formation of all systems of religion ; it has 
 played the part of instructor by embodying moral-religious 
 ideals in pictures, statues, and buildings, and thus holding 
 up to men's constant contemplation those ethical and reli- 
 gious conceptions which artistic imagination has adopted 
 or created from current thought ; and by its appeal to the 
 emotional nature it has stimulated and intensified the whole 
 of man's religious side. 
 
 The social-political constitution of a community usually 
 serves as model for its theistic system. The organization of 
 the clan, the family, the nation, in the relations of husband 
 and wife, parent and child, ruler and subject, is reproduced in 
 the construction of the supernatural powers. In savage tribes 
 the deity is father or husband or chief of the clan ; in more 
 advanced communities he becomes king, tyrant, or archon, his 
 powers and qualities being those of his human model. In 
 the Christian Church a resemblance may be traced between 
 forms of church government and the social-political ideas of 
 the periods or communities in which they have arisen.
 
 14 INTRODUCTION. 
 
 The influence of science and ethics on religion may be 
 examined somewhat more at length. 
 
 3. Keligion and science have this in common, that they 
 both attempt to explain the phenomena of the world and of 
 life. They differ in that this explanation is a secondary object 
 for religion, a primary object for science. Beligion, recognizing 
 the divine, seeks to enter into relation with it, gain its favor, 
 and secure its aid. It sees intimations of the divine in man 
 and in the world. Men began with assuming that all phe- 
 nomena were the direct acts of the deity ; that they had a 
 direct relation with the existing human life, and were con- 
 trolled by motives such as men felt in themselves. Eain, 
 drought, sunshine and cloud, wind, thunder and lightning, 
 earthquake and eclipse, were conceived to be expressions of 
 the divine pleasure or displeasure; all the fortunes of life 
 were supposed to be the direct product of the intervention 
 of the deity. Life was thought of as a system of rewards 
 and punishments from without, fashioned by the good-will 
 or anger of the superhuman power, according as man was 
 obedient or disobedient. From the creation of the world to 
 the growth of a blade of grass, from the extinction of a 
 nation to the most trivial bodily pain, all was looked on as 
 the immediate act of a god, friendly or unfriendly, standing 
 outside of and above human thought and effort. 
 
 The scientific impulse that is, the desire to understand 
 phenomena was coeval with the religious ; but as it de- 
 manded more exact observation, its development was slower. 
 Little by little, facts were observed in their connections, 
 sequences were established, and the belief in an orderly ar- 
 rangement of things came into existence. This belief laid 
 the foundations at once of civilization and of spiritual reli- 
 gion. As long as men were ignorant of the natural order of 
 things, on which all effective industry depends, they were 
 at the mercy of superstition and of chance ; they began to
 
 THE INTERNAL DEVELOPMENT OF IDEAS. 15 
 
 make progress as soon as they accepted natural law, and 
 yielded themselves to its guidance. As a matter of course, 
 the domain of natural law was subtracted from that of direct 
 divine intervention. The effect on religion of such a view 
 was not to diminish the conception of divine power, but only 
 to modify the interpretation of phenomena as expressions 
 of the will of the deity. Freer play was given to human 
 thought and activity when it was seen that man's inner life 
 sprang from himself, and that outward events, whether in 
 the domain of physical nature or in that of human action, 
 could be in some degree foreseen and controlled in the inter- 
 ests of the individual. More and more it came to be felt 
 that God, though omniscient and omnipotent, had so ordered 
 things that the immediate, practical direction of affairs was 
 in man's hands ; the whole might be directed by the divine 
 power for ends beyond man's ken, but the visible nexus of 
 events was committed to the human mind ; the world was 
 given over to man to be studied and subdued, and he was 
 intrusted with the care of his own heart, to fashion and train 
 it according to the demands of conscience. But-here, in the 
 domain of conscience and spiritual life, he was felt not to 
 stand alone ; gradually the conviction gained strength that 
 the divine influence manifested itself in the spiritual sphere, 
 bringing the heart of man into harmony with the divine 
 spirit, and disciplining it into purity. During this period of 
 scientific training, the idea of God was constantly advancing, 
 rising from the warrior or demon of earliest times to the 
 spirit of justice and love. 
 
 Science has been the handmaid and friend of religion, re- 
 lieving it of the burden of superstitions, of false relations 
 between phenomena, and pushing it to the conception of the 
 spiritual relation between man and God. This long-con- 
 tinued process (still going on) might be called a conflict 
 between the two, but it is better to regard it as a single
 
 16 INTRODUCTION. 
 
 process, in which one element in human life has been con- 
 stantly influenced by another. There have indeed been 
 sharp conflicts. Religion has identified itself with certain 
 physical beliefs, invested them with divine sacredness, and 
 mercilessly trampled on all who opposed them, the Galileo 
 episodes of history are not few. Even to-day the purely 
 scientific theories of the evolutionary origin of man and of 
 the Pentateuch seem to some persons anti-religious and de- 
 structive, things to be opposed as warmly as if they denied 
 man's moral nature. But on the other hand, there is a con- 
 stantly widening religious circle which holds that science, 
 being simply the observation of phenomena, can never be 
 hostile to religion properly conceived ; can be only beneficial 
 in helping to define the religious sphere ; cannot limit the 
 power of God, who stands above or beneath phenomena, but 
 may better our conception of him ; can, in a word, result only 
 in the purification of religion, and therefore in its exaltation 
 and strengthening as an element of human life. 
 
 4. Ethics, like science, has worked out its results inde- 
 pendently of religion, to which, however, it is nearer in its 
 material, and from which it has generally derived its highest 
 motives and sanctions. 
 
 We are here dealing with practical ethics, the moral or- 
 dering of human life, men's ideas of right and wrong, and 
 the way in which they were arrived at. Our moral codes 
 arise out of the necessity that is laid upon man to live in 
 society. 1 The individual starts with certain instincts (the 
 
 1 In some cases social or governmental usages and quasi-ethical rules 
 issue out of religious ideas, notably under the operation of tabu. Such 
 usages are felt in primitive societies to be distinctly religious, for example, 
 the prohibition of the use of the name of the chief or king, who is regarded 
 as a divine person ; the laws relating to food among the Persians, Arabs, 
 Jews, and other peoples (treated in the Levitical codes as religious usages) ; 
 customs connected with childbirth (these also retain their religious character 
 in the Old Testament law), and special disabilities as to food imposed on 
 women ; the stringent prescriptions controlling sacerdotal persons in all
 
 THE INTERNAL DEVELOPMENT OF IDEAS. 17 
 
 origin of which we need not stop here to ask) which direct 
 his conduct ; these instincts are self-assertion and sympathy. 
 How these shall manifest themselves in actual life, how each 
 shall modify and control the other, this is determined only 
 by the needs of social life, by the conclusions which men 
 reach respecting the well-being of the whole society, or what 
 practically amounts to the same thing, by the individual's 
 opinion of what will secure the best good of himself consid- 
 ered as a member of society, himself including any circle 
 whose interests he regards as identical with his own. Moral 
 rules relating to respect for property and life, and to utter- 
 ance of truth, spring naturally from experience, which shows 
 that without them society could not exist. Social progress 
 is attended by the formulation of constantly broadening 
 rules of conduct, as men's relations with their fellows be- 
 come wider and more intimate ; as the recognition of the 
 power and value of each human personality becomes more 
 
 ancient nations, as, for example, the Roman Flamen Dialis and vestal 
 virgins, and the Jewish priesthood. Such of these customs as concern the 
 general daily life probably rest finally on social conditions ; the sacredness 
 or (what is the same thing) the " uucleanness " of the cow, the swine, and 
 other animals (whether totemistic in origin or not) may be supposed to de- 
 pend on their relation to the life of early man. When the strictly tabu or 
 religious character of these usages begins to fade away, they are brought 
 more and more under the control of ethical principles and judged accord- 
 ingly ; when they cease to be religious they are maintained or set aside by 
 considerations derived, n&t from religion, but from social life. The canon law 
 against marrying the sister of a deceased wife (based, apparently, on a mis- 
 interpretation of Lev. xviii. 18) is now discussed on purely ethical grounds. 
 In some cases religion adopts and enforces social conditions, as in the Hindu 
 caste system, which seems to have arisen from the amalgamation of various 
 tribes. More generally, it may be said to be probable that in most instances of 
 religious-ethical usage, religion makes a special application of an ethical prin- 
 ciple already wrought out by society. Thus, if a field is made tabu by a 
 private man, the respect which other men show for his rights rests finally on 
 their recognition of the rights of property. It is, however, often difficult to 
 decide where the religious feeling ends and the ethical begins. It is sufficient 
 for our purposes to accept the fact that the general ethical system of men 
 has arisen from social relations. 
 
 2
 
 18 INTRODUCTION. 
 
 distinct ; and as the sense of union among all men empha- 
 sizes the feeling that the good of one is inseparably con- 
 nected with the good of all. The final result of the process 
 is the formation of ethical ideals which are always in ad- 
 vance of the actual practice, which become more exalted 
 with each age of progress, are more and more loved for 
 their own sake, and take their place as a definite and pow- 
 ertul ethical impulse. They are naturally appropriated by 
 the individual, and form the material on which the instinct 
 of self-assertion or self-perfecting acts. These two lines of 
 ethical growth, the perfecting of self and the perfecting of 
 society, inseparably connected from the beginning, and 
 brought into an ever-growing closeness of alliance, act and 
 react on each other, and tend to form the absolute subjective 
 ethical unity, in which the whole nature of man shall be 
 consecrated to the highest ethical ideals. 
 
 Ethics thus belongs essentially to human relations, and is 
 in itself independent of that sense of the divine which con- 
 stitutes religion. The instances are well known of deep or 
 high religious feeling existing along with low ethical ideas : 
 Socrates, with his pure conception of the deity and his ap- 
 proval of practices now looked on as monstrous ; the lofty 
 theistic creed of the exilian Isaiah, and the unhappy inter- 
 national sentiment of Psalm cxxxvii. ; the intense piety and 
 the relentless cruelty of the Spanish Inquisition ; the Ge- 
 neva of the sixteenth century, religiously serious and strenu- 
 ous, yet thinking it a desirable thing to put a man to death 
 for denial of a theological dogma ; the piety and pitilessness 
 of the English Puritans of the seventeenth century , Sanchez 
 and Xavier in the same religious community ; devotion to 
 the Church and disregard of honesty and truthfulness in 
 many individuals in all parts of the world to-day. There 
 are as many examples of the coexistence of little or no reli- 
 gious feeling and pure ethical ideas and practice: Stoics,
 
 THE INTERNAL DEVELOPMENT OF IDEAS. 19 
 
 Epicureans, Confucianists, Buddhists, Comtists, Agnostics, 
 in the ranks of these and other bodies which practically dis- 
 pense with God are found men inferior to none in strictness 
 of moral code and practice, in the exhibition of the finest 
 and most genial ethical feeling. The sense of the divine 
 may be high, while the feeling of sympathy with one's fellow- 
 men is low ; or, conversely, the first may be feeble and the 
 second strong. In like manner a scientific or unscientific 
 conception of God may coexist with great or small religious 
 or ethical feeling. 
 
 Yet there is a very important relation between religion 
 and ethics ; they tend constantly to coalesce. God, who is 
 the religious ideal, naturally becomes the ethical ideal, and 
 comes to embody the best ethical thought of each period, 
 this thought having been developed, however, not by reli- 
 gion, but out of social conditions. It is a familiar fact that 
 in a growing community for example, among the Hebrews 
 of the Old Testament time the conception of the deity be- 
 comes ethically higher and higher ; theology appropriates 
 the results of moral experience. There is then a reaction on 
 human life ; man shapes his conduct so as to please the 
 deity, and the greater the ethical purity of the divine char- 
 acter, the greater the stimulus to man's moral life. In ad- 
 dition to this purely ethical relation, there is the sanction 
 conceived to be affixed to the moral law by the Supreme 
 Euler ; the rewards and punishments in this world and the 
 next, bestowed by the deity, constitute to some extent a bar- 
 rier against wrong-doing and an encouragement of right- 
 doing ; though as a matter of fact it would seem that men's 
 social conduct is usually determined more by their relations 
 to their fellows than by their relations to God, rather by 
 the visible and immediate than by the invisible and remote. 
 Scientific thought also modifies this conception ; it discards 
 anthropomorphic divine intervention, and represents ethical
 
 20 INTRODUCTION. 
 
 good and evil as bringing their reward and punishment 
 solely in the way of natural law. 
 
 Practical religion is the attempt to propitiate the deity 
 and live in union with him ; practical ethics is the attempt 
 to recognize man and live in harmony with him. But out 
 of the idea of ethical obligation naturally arises the con- 
 ception of absolute right, which must be identified with the 
 idea of God. Eight, truth, goodness, these are the will of 
 God ; they are the moral order of the universe, the mani- 
 festation of the infinite spirit. From this point of view 
 religion and ethics are one ; to know God is to know his 
 ethical self-manifestation in the world. This is the highest 
 single conception of the divine ; but the complete knowledge 
 of God includes, as far as human thought can comprehend 
 it, the whole of the divine self-manifestation. And this, as 
 is intimated above, has been the underlying idea in all reli- 
 gious history. Men have put their best science and ethics 
 into their conception of the divine, ethics and science both 
 imperfect in varying degrees, and the conception of God con- 
 sequently exhibiting what seems to us to be contradiction. 
 
 5. Religion is thus primarily a sentiment, the recognition 
 of the relation between God and man, the effort to found 
 life on something higher than man ; and its content is deter- 
 mined by science and ethics. To the former is due man's 
 conception of the nature of the divine and the mode of its 
 self-manifestation ; from the latter comes the moral ideal of 
 life from which religion can never withdraw itself. Dogma 
 and conduct are the necessary complements of the religious 
 sentiment, the material which the religious consciousness 
 assimilates, and by which it grows ; and the history of re- 
 ligion consists in the development of these two elements. 
 Ritual is merely a form of expression of dogma, 1 The ab- 
 
 1 This is true even in those early systems in which ritual may be said to 
 form the whole of religion.
 
 GREAT MEN. 21 
 
 solute power of any given religion will be in proportion to 
 the purity that is, the spirituality of its dogma, and 
 the elevation of its moral ideal; its practical power at a 
 given moment and in a given community will depend on 
 its capacity to commend relatively high dogmatic and ethi- 
 cal conceptions to men's minds and hearts. 
 
 3. GREAT MEN. 
 
 We have spoken of social-religious progress as continuous, 
 and this it doubtless is when long periods are taken into 
 consideration. But within these longer periods progress is 
 marked by flows and ebbs, elevations and depressions, in- 
 tervals of calm followed by apparent sudden outbursts of 
 energy. We are not called on here to attempt the explana- 
 tion of this fact ; it is sufficient to note its existence. But 
 there is one feature of the development so important as to 
 call for special mention, the part, namely, played by indi- 
 viduals in the extension and elevation of human thought. 
 History proceeds by crises, and a crisis implies a great man. 
 
 1. We may say in the first place that great men are a 
 necessity in social progress. At intervals of greater or less 
 extent the ideas and institutions of a growing society have 
 to be recast in accordance with advancing thought. For a 
 time men may be able and willing to live under a set of in- 
 stitutions with which they are more or less consciously out 
 of sympathy ; there will be a general uneasiness, which for 
 a while, however, will not be sufficient to interfere with the 
 orderly course of life. But there comes a time when a 
 change is imperatively demanded. Conscience, the moral 
 and religious ideal, protests against the existing order ; there 
 is an increasingly oppressive feeling that the present is out 
 of relation with the past and the future, a sense of rnoral- 
 religious uncomfortableness, which drives men to define 
 their ideals and to shape life in accordance therewith. This
 
 22 INTRODUCTION. 
 
 sense of the need of social and individual renewal naturally 
 becomes distinct and effective first in the minds of the cho- 
 sen few, the leaders of thought, those whose souls are aglow 
 with moral-religious excitement and inspiration, the true 
 practical idealists. But even a small body of men find it 
 hard to attain the definiteness and unity which are essential 
 to action ; individual divergencies lame practical energy. 
 Some one man must, as a rule, put himself at the head of 
 the movement, called to that position by his gifts, and en- 
 forcing recognition by his eminence ; and as a matter of 
 fact such an one usually appears so soon as the time is ripe 
 for action. Such crises are continually occurring in life ; 
 they are of different degrees of importance, relating to all 
 affairs from the smallest to the largest, from the opening of 
 a new street in a city to a change of the organization of a 
 college, from the introduction of a new fashion in dress to a 
 revolution in science or government, or the restatement of 
 the religious beliefs of a nation or a continent. But great 
 or small, each will have its representative man, who is the 
 embodiment of the current ideas and the mouthpiece of 
 opinion, the concentration of the energy of the circle of 
 interests involved. He is always the great man of the oc- 
 casion ; and when the body of thought which he represents 
 is large and effective, he is one of the great men of the 
 world. 
 
 2. It is involved in what is said above that such a man 
 is born out of the thought of his time ; he is essentially the 
 child of his age. The material of his thought must come 
 from his own present and past; an absolute break is un- 
 thinkable. Thought itself is impossible without material 
 already furnished to the mind. Usually it is possible to 
 discover a man's relation to his past and to his present ; 
 this is what we demand from the biographer, arid this is 
 what he undertakes to do, whether his subject be Calvin or
 
 GREAT MEN. 23 
 
 Confucius, Zoroaster or Swedenborg. We feel that an idea 
 born out of nothing would be unintelligible and dead. 
 
 3. Yet in this process, which we must recognize as or- 
 derly, there is always something inexplicable in the achieve- 
 ment of the guiding mind. We may demonstrate the man's 
 relation to his past, exhibit the circle of ideas in which he 
 grows up, and perceive the connection between his thought 
 and that of his times ; but in the last analysis, when we 
 reach the creative moment, it is impossible to give the his- 
 tory of the process. There is a mystery in his mental ex- 
 periences, in the way in which he seizes on the problem, 
 combines its elements, and reaches his result. He himself 
 can commonly give no logical account of his procedure, he 
 can only say that he sees and knows the solution ; out of 
 many possible ways of dealing with the questions of life, 
 he has chosen one which proves to be the right one, inas- 
 much as it commends itself to men and introduces harmony 
 and peace in place of discord and unrest. The larger the 
 problem, the more numerous do the possible solutions seem 
 to men to be, the greater the difficulty of seizing on the one 
 simple thought which shall convert the chaos into a cosmos, 
 and the harder to represent the mental spiritual process by 
 which the transforming discovery is made. It is a mystery 
 that meets us in every department of human life ; when we 
 have called it genius, intuition, or inspiration, so far from 
 defining it, we have only labelled it with a name which defies 
 definition. Great artists, statesmen, discoverers of natural 
 law, social and religious reformers, move in a sphere beyond 
 the reach of other men ; they are linked with the world by 
 all natural ties, but their thought seems to be born in a 
 sphere above the world. Their fellow-men have naturally 
 thought of them as seized on by a higher power, especially 
 when they had to do with the religious life ; the word " inspira- 
 tion ;> has been almost exclusively set apart to denote the deep
 
 24 INTRODUCTION. 
 
 spiritual knowledge and the transforming religious energy 
 which, it has seemed to men, could issue only from a super- 
 human source. It is the word which expresses for our or- 
 dinary conception the mysteriousness of the human soul in 
 contrast with its orderly obedience to law. These two ele- 
 ments of human thought are harmonized when we conceive 
 of it as the creation of the divine spirit working according 
 to natural law. 
 
 4. Such an eminently endowed leader of men gives so- 
 ciety in a real sense something new; he converts into an 
 established principle and rule of life what was before only 
 a vague conception or desire. The undefined sense of need 
 which for generations had stirred men into an unrecognized 
 uneasiness, and had manifested itself in inarticulate cries 
 rather than in intelligible words, rather by gropings than 
 by organized action, this he clearly recognizes and formu- 
 lates, and then offers something which shall satisfy the need, 
 and make rational and happy activity possible. Thencefor- 
 ward the life of society is changed ; there has entered into it 
 an element which did not exist before. The difference be- 
 tween the new and the old is the difference between vision 
 and blindness ; there has come the discovery of the disease 
 and the application of the remedy. Men's view of life has 
 changed ; their attitude toward the facts of religious experi- 
 ence is different. The proper centre is established ; things 
 group themselves more naturally, and are estimated more 
 nearly according to their real nature and importance. The 
 discovery that the Hebrew vowel-points were not given to 
 Moses from the mouth of God on Mount Sinai was a veri- 
 table liberation of thought. The declaration of Jeremiah 
 and Ezekiel, that the true divine law was written on men's 
 hearts, must have been revolutionary for the circle of men 
 who believed it ; they could not afterward look on religious 
 life in the same way as before. A wider liberation was
 
 GREAT MEN. 25 
 
 effected by the moral-religious principle announced by Paul 
 and adopted from him by Luther, that righteousness is a 
 transformation of soul instead of a string of legal perform- 
 ances. It is a still loftier and more potent principle which 
 is contained in the word of Jesus, that all moral-religious 
 life is summed up in love to God and man. When such 
 principles as these have been announced and accepted, so- 
 ciety assumes a new form. What was before shapeless be- 
 comes organized and regulated ; that which was a dim longing 
 becomes a definite impulse. Life approaches nearer to unity ; 
 there is less disharmony between mind and soul, between 
 what tradition and custom sanctify and what reflection ap- 
 proves, there is the sense of the removal of a weight, a 
 fuller freedom of activity in thought and feeling. The con- 
 nection with the past is not destroyed, but past and present 
 are renewed into a higher life. 
 
 5. The part played by individual men in the establish- 
 ment of great universal religions is well known. There is 
 no doubt as to the process of origination of Christianity and 
 Islam ; and while in regard to Buddhism scholars are divided 
 in opinion, there is a strong disposition to trace it to some one 
 man. In China a great role, no doubt, is to be assigned to 
 Confucius ; on the other hand, the personality of the Israeli- 
 tish Moses is dim, and the Persian Zoroaster is probably to 
 be abandoned to the region of legend and myth. Socrates, 
 Luther, and Wesley embody in themselves great religious 
 movements. These men are all the prophets, the spokes- 
 men, of the religious consciousness of their times, and they 
 are no less independent and creative thinkers. It is neces- 
 sary, therefore, in tracing the history of any religious move- 
 ment to take into account these two elements, the religious 
 attitude of the epoch and the personality of the founder. It 
 is only by combining and harmonizing the two that we can 
 reach a clear idea of the evolution of the new religious
 
 26 INTRODUCTION. 
 
 principle. It is a misfortune for the history of Buddhism 
 that the person of Gautama is so enshrouded in legend ; Mo- 
 hammed is better known, and the beginnings of Islam far 
 clearer. For Christianity we have records of its founder 
 which, though embarrassed by legendary additions and re- 
 constructions, still enable us to form a tolerably distinct 
 picture of his person and life ; and this is the first task of 
 the historian of Christianity. 
 
 4. EXTERNAL CONDITIONS. 
 
 Up to this time we have been occupied with those con- 
 ditions and agencies which within the community itself 
 initiate and direct religious progress. But it is possible that 
 a community may be affected by its neighbors. Such in- 
 ternational influence is probably the rule in the history 
 of religions ; the better acquainted we become with the old 
 religious faiths of the world, the more clearly we see that 
 they are not simple products each of one national con- 
 sciousness, but have all more or less freely given and re- 
 ceived. We cannot, of course, assume in any particular 
 case that such international action and reaction have oc- 
 curred ; the question is to be decided by an examination of 
 the facts. 
 
 1. The religious influence exerted by one nation on an- 
 other depends for its extent in part on the closeness of the 
 intercourse between the two. The relations must be such 
 that there is an exchange of individual opinions by conver- 
 sation or by books. A very favorable condition for inter- 
 change of ideas is contiguity of social groups, when one 
 community, by its local relations to another, is compelled to 
 become acquainted with the customs and opinions of its 
 neighbor ; a good example of this is furnished in the early 
 history of the Jews when they had partly conquered Canaan, 
 and Israelitish and Canaanitish communities dwelt side by
 
 EXTERNAL CONDITIONS. 27 
 
 side, intermarrying and coming to share one another's ideas 
 in- a very definite manner. More general social relations 
 may be maintained by commercial intercourse, such as ex- 
 isted among all the national groups in Canaan and Syria in 
 David's time, or between the Tigris-Euphrates valley and 
 the Greek and other residents in Asia Minor from an early 
 period ; or political relations may induce an exchange of 
 ideas, as when King Ahaz of Judah, going to Damascus to 
 meet the Assyrian king, Tiglathpileser, saw there a Syrian 
 altar the pattern of which he sent to his priest Urijah at 
 Jerusalem with orders to make one like it ; or as when Ma- 
 nasseh, as it would appear, adopted the Assyrian astral wor- 
 ship ; or exile, like that of the Jews in Babylonia, may bring 
 about intimate social relations. After the rise of the Persian 
 empire the Jews in Babylonia and elsewhere must have been 
 constantly in contact with Persian opinions and customs. 
 The Greek conquest of Asia in the fourth century B. c. in- 
 troduced Greek settlements and ideas into all the Western 
 Asiatic communities, and promoted a contact of mind which 
 was eminently favorable to the adoption of new ideas. Tor 
 some centuries before Mohammed's time communities of 
 Jews and Christians had been living in Arabia in the closest 
 personal intercourse with the natives. In India, on the 
 other hand, in the period when Buddhism arose, there seem 
 to be no traces of such foreign influence. 
 
 2. In such social intercourse we may commonly assume 
 reciprocal influence, each community will be more or less 
 affected by the other. In which direction the greater effect 
 will be produced, will be determined by the relative impres- 
 sibility of the two communities; and this will depend on 
 their relative religious development, the less will be di- 
 rected by the greater. A higher general social culture, more 
 definite opinions, better elaborated institutions, will impress 
 themselves on that community which stands lower in these
 
 28 INTRODUCTION. 
 
 respects. Impressibility will come from the natural desire 
 to know and adopt what is pleasing. 1 The Jews were in- 
 ferior in general culture and in certain points of religious 
 development to the early Canaan ites, the Assyrians and Baby- 
 lonians, the Persians and the Greeks ; the Arabians of the 
 sixth century of our era felt the religious superiority of the 
 Jews and Christians ; the direction of the influence was in 
 accordance with these relations. 
 
 3. Another favorable condition of international influence 
 (closely connected with the first-mentioned) is the excite- 
 ment of thought arising from lively social movement. The 
 older civilization was made comparatively stagnant by the 
 fixedness of national lines. At that stage of growth it was 
 instinctively felt that national isolation was a necessity ; 
 there could be no brotherhood of nations, no rapid and 
 stirring interchange of thought. But all this was changed 
 by the Greek conquest. The mixture and close contact of 
 different nationalities forced men to recognize one another, 
 partly obliterated the old stiff national lines, and called out 
 a hospitality for new ideas which had never before been seen 
 in the world. Greeks, Jews, and Romans came into close 
 relation with one another, and the result of their interchange 
 of ideas may be traced in the religious history of the time. 
 The interesting point for our discussion is whether the Jews 
 were materially affected by the Greeks. 
 
 4. The borrowing of ideas which results from social inter- 
 course may be direct or indirect, conscious or unconscious. 
 There are cases in which a religious reformer has deliberately 
 borrowed institutions and ideas from the books of foreign 
 religious communities ; so Mohammed did from the Hebrew 
 
 1 It is of course essential that a religion, in order that it may be influ- 
 enced, should not have reached the point of petrifaction, that some of its 
 material should be in a fluid state ; and in point of fact, a living community 
 never hardens into this insensibility, but always reserves a certain power of 
 self-modification.
 
 EXTERNAL CONDITIONS. 29 
 
 and Christian Scriptures. 1 Princes and priests may intro- 
 duce new forms of worship ; the Eomans adopted Syrian 
 deities and cults, and the Greeks appropriated Egyptian 
 symbols and ceremonies ; possibly in this way it was that 
 the feast of Purim came to the Jews from the Persians. 
 
 Perhaps, however, it is the unconscious influence of one 
 community on another that is the more deep and lasting. 
 Ideas represented by the customs and expressions of one 
 people insensibly make their way to others, and commend 
 themselves by their naturalness and utility, by their capacity 
 to satisfy an existing feeling of need. They may at first be 
 adopted by advanced thinkers, and be gradually propagated 
 in the lower strata of society ; or they may receive for a long 
 time no definite expression, they may be simply in the air. 
 Silently they make themselves felt ; more and more, genera- 
 tion after generation, they color and control ideas, opinions, 
 and usages. Finally they find expression in books or customs ; 
 the community accepts them as something quite natural, and 
 wakes up to find itself in possession of thoughts which were 
 unknown to the fathers, the genesis and authority of which 
 no one is able to trace. After a while comes a period of re- 
 flection which seeks to bring the present into logical relation 
 with the past; the new ideas are held to have existed in 
 ancient customs and writings, back to which they are fol- 
 lowed in an unbroken line, and the silent influences which 
 produced them pass out of memory and rest unrecorded. 
 Effects of this sort could doubtless be traced in the history 
 of all religions if the data were sufficiently numerous ; in 
 later Jewish history the important periods in this regard 
 are the Persian and the Greek. 
 
 5. It is obvious that the choice which a community makes 
 in borrowing will be determined largely by the relation of 
 
 1 The contents of these writings were known to him, not by his own read- 
 ing, but through garbled oral communications.
 
 30 INTRODUCTION. 
 
 the new ideas to the existing system of thought. A nation 
 does not readily abandon its conception of life and religion ; 
 there is a definitely fashioned skeleton, which, however, may 
 be clothed anew and so modify its form ; there is a persistent 
 idea, which maintains itself against all assaults from with- 
 out, yet is capable of assimilating new material, of extending 
 and defining itself by modifications which do not touch its 
 essential nature. A borrowed idea will attach itself to some 
 recognized thought of a community ; the borrowing, to be 
 healthy and beneficent, must be a free assimilation, not a 
 mechanical addition, and fulness of life may be measured by 
 the capacity for natural appropriation. We cannot say be- 
 forehand how far this process of assimilation may go ; forms 
 of religion, like forms of organic life, seem to be capable of 
 indefinite variation without abandoning the type. The 
 question what constitutes the essence of a religion can be 
 answered only after a survey of its complete historical de- 
 velopment ; it is only then that we can perceive what has 
 remained fixed amid all the modifications of idea and usage. 
 
 5. THE GENERAL LINES OF PROGRESS. 
 
 The advance which a religion makes under the favorable 
 conditions above described will be in accordance with the 
 general character of social progress. It is a growth from 
 youth to manhood ; it signifies a more serious view of life, 
 a deeper conception of fundamentals, a sharper analysis 
 which separates the higher from the lower. The progress 
 may be greater or less, but in so far as it exists at all we 
 can hardly think of it as not involving a change from the 
 less to the more general. 
 
 1. One natural result is the abandonment of local usages. 
 This takes place in a nation in proportion as its religion is 
 centralized, and as a civilized unity comes into existence. A 
 national church of to-day imposes its customs on all parts
 
 THE GENERAL LINES OF PROGRESS. 31 
 
 of the land; and these are broader and more human than 
 those of any particular district. It was a true instinct that 
 led the Jews of the seventh century B. c. to insist that Je- 
 rusalem should be the only lawful place of worship ; it was 
 the only way to wipe out the unseemlinesses of the local 
 cults. The effect is wider when a nation is forced to judge 
 its customs by the standard of other national usages. The 
 broader international feeling leads men to dispense with 
 those things which are likely to offend the common feeling. 
 At the same time the conviction naturally grows that such 
 things are relatively unimportant. Yet it is impossible to 
 say beforehand how far the outward form will be retained. 
 In all organized systems of religion up to the present time 
 some framework of form has been found to be necessary; 
 and experience only can demonstrate how much of it will 
 prove to be compatible with the life of larger societies. 
 Buddhism began as a mendicant order, a constitution which 
 would have excluded the majority of men; but in time it 
 modified this arrangement, introducing grades which recog- 
 nized the ordinary social relations, yet always giving greatest 
 honor to the original form. Judaism took the same course 
 with respect to circumcision, not always insisting on it, but 
 still making it the badge of highest religious citizenship ; 
 Paul, with the instinct of genius, took the bold step of prac- 
 tically abolishing it. Mohammed showed his wisdom in the 
 simplicity of the forms which he imposed on his followers ; 
 the most oppressive of them the pilgrimage to Mecca 
 was afterward dispensed with in various simple ways. The 
 Catholic Church has means of lightening its ceremonial 
 burdens under certain circumstances. It is the instinct 
 of the religion which guides it in such matters. The first 
 and most important step is its extension beyond its origi- 
 nal national bounds ; having passed out into a wider world, 
 it will know how to change its form according to circum-
 
 32 INTRODUCTION. 
 
 stances, and its capacity to do this will be a measure of its 
 success. 
 
 2. The more important element of progress is the general- 
 ization of ideas, the excision of the local and sensuous, and 
 the emphasizing of the broadly spiritual. The agencies by 
 which this is effected are pointed out above. The growth 
 of national self-consciousness, the development of thought 
 which naturally attends the widening of social relations, ad- 
 vance in ethical feeling, the rise of scientific thought, contact 
 with foreign ideas, these occasion a constant revision and 
 reformulation of religious ideas in the light of broader 
 knowledge, and the abandonment of such things as offend 
 the finer religious sense. The Jews after a while gave up 
 the national proper name Yahwe, substituting for it the 
 general term God, or some such paraphrase as The Lord, or 
 The Holy One. Islam contented itself with a statement of 
 the divine character and government so simple that it could 
 be understood by all the world. Similar processes might be 
 traced in all the great religions. Here, again, it is impossible 
 to say beforehand what direction the simplification and gen- 
 eralization will take. This will depend on the character and 
 needs of the communities involved, and will always be ten- 
 tative ; that is, the generalization will proceed as far as it is 
 forced by the public thought to go, and will advance only in 
 those societies in which it proves to be an element of success. 
 Although force has been often used in the propagation of 
 religions, yet to explain their success we have always to con- 
 sider finally their capacity to adapt themselves to the social- 
 religious conditions of human life. Islam, for example, has 
 kept itself pure only in Semitic communities. 
 
 3. National advance in breadth and elevation of thought 
 does not, however, account for the rise of the great universal 
 religions. In a national religious system most diverse ele- 
 ments are mingled, broad and narrow, high and low,
 
 THE GENERAL LINES OF PROGRESS. 33 
 
 attractive and repulsive. These, according to their charac- 
 ters, commend themselves to different circles. The victory 
 of new ideas is gradual; at a given moment, while the 
 farthest advanced line of thinkers have reached pure con- 
 ceptions of man's relation to God, a large mass of the people 
 may be buried in superstition, formalism, or indifference. 
 The religious books and creeds will show the same diversi- 
 ties, masses of noble thought embedded in low, mechanical 
 conceptions. Or, at the best, the national development may 
 be seeking to purify and elaborate some religious element 
 of life which, though not without virtue and potency, is not 
 the highest, and not of a sort to commend itself outside the 
 limits of the nation. In point of fact this is what seems to 
 have occurred in the case of Brahmanism and Judaism ; 
 Islam does not here come under consideration, for it was 
 invented at a blow, we may say, out of almost entirely 
 foreign ' materials. In this mixture of national religious 
 opinions, what is needed, in order to secure a new vitalizing 
 impulse, is just that which happened to the Jews at the 
 conclusion of the Babylonian exile. They went to Babylonia 
 as a motley mixture of good and bad, a comparatively small 
 prophetic circle which shared the opinions of Jeremiah and 
 Ezekiel, and a large majority whose views and usages are set 
 forth in the naive speech made by the men and women in 
 Pathros in reply to the prophet Jeremiah's indignant re- 
 proof : " As long as we worshipped the queen [or host] of 
 heaven we were happy ; since we have left off this worship 
 all this evil has come upon us." The exile sifted this mixed 
 community ; only those returned to Palestine who were in sym- 
 pathy with the prophetic ideas and could begin the national 
 life on a new basis. And in the same way, in Babylonia the 
 idolatrous portion was absorbed in the alien population, and 
 those who were in sympathy with the higher national con- 
 ceptions formed a separate circle and lived a new life. The 
 
 3
 
 34 INTRODUCTION. 
 
 starting-point of the new Jewish life was the selection of a 
 new idea as the basis of organization ; purified from alien 
 elements, this idea colored and controlled the whole subse- 
 quent national development. Some such process is neces- 
 sary for the transformation of a national into a universal 
 religion. The choice of a central idea will be made by the 
 whole community, under the leadership of individuals. In 
 the exilian and post-exilian history of the Jews, we have 
 glimpses of controlling minds, Ezekiel, Zerubbabel, Joshua, 
 Ezra, Nehemiah ; and if we were better acquainted with the 
 history of the Babylonian Jews of that period, we should no 
 doubt find there also men whose personal influence guided 
 the thought of the community. In the larger religious 
 movements, as is remarked above, the presence of a con- 
 trolling individual mind seems to be necessary to give unity 
 and effectiveness to the new development, though the leader 
 will naturally gather about him a body of coadjutors.' 
 
 4. And this leads to the mention of another condition 
 of the transition to a universal religious form which is 
 involved in what has just been said. The revolution must 
 be a product of the times, a response to the demand for 
 change, the outcome of generations of thought. The man 
 or the men who appear as leaders put into shape (as is ob- 
 served above) what many of their contemporaries had indef- 
 initely thought ; they give vitality to the unorganized mass 
 of vague conceptions. They themselves would be impossible 
 without the background of the community, without the 
 accumulation of thought which they inherit from the past. 
 This is obvious in so many cases that we are warranted in 
 assuming it to be probable even when definite facts cannot 
 be adduced in proof. There is evidence that Mohammed 
 arose out of a circle of thinkers who represented a tendency 
 of the times ; there are reasons for believing that the founder 
 of Buddhism did not occupy an isolated religious position.
 
 THE GENERAL LINES OF PROGRESS. 35 
 
 It is clear that Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and Ezra were true 
 prophets of their times, the spokesmen of select groups who 
 were in sympathy with the deeper and more spiritual thought 
 of their periods. There is no reason to suppose that Chris- 
 tianity is an exception to this general principle. 
 
 It is true in one sense that the success of a religious revo- 
 lution depends on the completeness with which its creator 
 responds to the needs of the age. Men will take only what 
 seems to them to be useful ; popular approbation is the meas- 
 ure of practical wisdom. But this is a local and temporary 
 criterion ; it does not follow that the tendency of an age 
 is the best possible, or its satisfaction the absolute right. 
 A reformer may go far beyond the conceptions of his times, 
 and be unsuccessful because not understood. To be imme- 
 diately effective he must stand in close relation with his 
 contemporaries, and it is not conceivable that he should be 
 entirely out of relation with them. But it is possible that 
 while one side of his thought is apprehended and accepted, 
 another and higher side may be ignored. In that case, his 
 highest influence will vanish unless it happen that he find 
 a prophet, an interpreter who shall know how to link his 
 person to the life of the times, and thus preserve the sub- 
 stance of his uncomprehended thought. The interpreter will 
 have his own conception of the person and work of the mas- 
 ter, and may initiate a new direction of religious thought, as 
 the Apostle Paul substantially did. It may then happen that 
 succeeding times shall throw off what is local in the thought 
 of the interpreter, and return to the idea of the master, of 
 which the interpreter's system is only the framework. 
 
 5. We are here, of course, employing the term " universal " 
 loosely to mean what is endowed with practically indefinite 
 capacity of extension. We know of no religion which experi- 
 ence has shown to be really universal. No religion has yet 
 been accepted by all nations ; and we should hardly be war-
 
 36 INTRODUCTION. 
 
 ranted in going beyond the bounds of experience and affirm- 
 ing that this or that religion has elements which must 
 commend it to all peoples. It is indeed difficult to see why- 
 Christianity in its simplest New Testament form should not 
 prove thus universally acceptable, though on the other hand, 
 it is impossible to say how far this simple faith, in order to 
 commend itself, must be supported by a more elaborate sys- 
 tem. And further, even when a religion is accepted in gen- 
 eral by a nation, it may be rejected by a considerable circle. 
 In the purest and highest historical religion there must re- 
 main something local and temporary ; and the question to be 
 decided by time will be how far it can dispense with this 
 local part without losing its essential nature. The abso- 
 lutely universal religion will be that which satisfies univer- 
 sal human needs, spiritual and intellectual, lacking nothing 
 which is necessary for the practical guidance of human life, 
 containing nothing which offends the most advanced thought, 
 offering and claiming nothing. which is not capable of uni- 
 versally acceptable demonstration. 
 
 6. EXTRA-NATIONAL EXTENSION. 
 
 In any social group of nations, as has already been pointed 
 out, there will be a mutual influence of their religions, ac- 
 cording to the nature and extent of their social intercourse. 
 In general, the stronger will coerce the weaker. The ele- 
 ments of strength and weakness are various, issuing from all 
 the social phenomena, and these latter change with every age 
 and clime. There are, however, a few conditions of interna- 
 tional influence which from the testimony of history we may 
 assume to be common to all those great movements in which 
 a religion extends itself beyond its national lines. 
 
 1. The principal condition of this sort of conquest is the 
 fact already mentioned, the possession of an idea broader 
 than national areas. There must be something that com-
 
 EXTRA-NATIONAL EXTENSION. 37 
 
 mends itself to the human soul apart from national feelings 
 and customs. Further than this, there must be something 
 that appeals to the age, that satisfies a need felt over a wide 
 space at that particular time. 
 
 2. This condition presupposes a certain unity in a section 
 of the world. It assumes that men in different nations, 
 starting from different points and proceeding along different 
 lines, have yet reached the same goal of religious feeling and 
 desire. It is the teaching of history that some such unifica- 
 tion as this is essential to the rise of a religion that shall 
 embrace various nationalities. This procedure is most ob- 
 vious in the history of the rise of Christianity ; the Greek 
 and Eoman conquests, by their political and intellectual re- 
 sults, had impressed a visible unity on the Western world. 
 The fact is less clear in the histories of Islam and Buddhism ; 
 but here also we can see that natural processes of culture 
 had brought a number of peoples or communities to about 
 the same stage of intellectual-religious growth, or it may be 
 better to say, to a point where real sympathy among them 
 in the religious life was possible. The Arabs of the first cen- 
 tury of Islam were capable of appreciating the moral and 
 religious ideas of the Christians and Mazdeans with whom 
 they came in contact ; of India and the neighboring lands 
 we have less information, but such indications as exist point 
 to a similarity in the social-religious structure of the various 
 nationalities affected by Buddhism. 
 
 3. The progress of a religion implies a sense of need in 
 the communities to which it commends itself. It signifies a 
 failure of existing religious systems, especially in peoples 
 alien to the home of the new religion. The people in whose 
 midst a new creed has sprung up have at least the training 
 of the ideas which produced it. This training has not been 
 so fully enjoyed by foreign peoples ; their sense of need and 
 emptiness will be all the more pronounced. Such a social-
 
 38 INTRODUCTION. 
 
 religious emptiness is distinctly visible in the areas first con- 
 quered by Christianity and Islam ; the Roman world was 
 tired of Greek and Latin divinities, and hopeless of anything 
 better ; the Christianity and the Mazdeism of the seventh 
 century, when Islam appeared, had dwindled into shapeless 
 masses of shrunken, lifeless dogmas ; l for the beginnings of 
 Buddhism we have no such full details, but we may perhaps 
 infer from the enthusiasm and vitality of Asoka's edicts that 
 the Brahmanism of the preceding centuries had left a vacuum 
 in the popular feeling. The national mind, thus emptied of 
 distinct convictions and hopes, is prepared to accept a well- 
 defined system of religious thought. 
 
 4. The conquering religion offers what is needed in the 
 way of precision and organization. It will possess not only 
 a general fundamental religious idea, but also the framework 
 necessary to give it popular acceptation. A simple ethical- 
 religious conception, however broad and pure, is usually 
 neither intelligible nor acceptable to the masses of men; 
 they demand in addition a drapery of processes and forms, 
 a certain quantity of machinery, a routine by which life 
 may be ordered. There is no instance on record of wide 
 popular acceptance of a religious system whose essence was 
 merely a principle of the inward life ; there is no reason to 
 suppose that a reformer who should confine himself to this 
 subjective ethical-religious sphere would be successful unless 
 his work were supplemented. Mohammed devised a system 
 remarkable not only for the purity and simplicity of its 
 dogma, but also for the mingled simplicity and complete- 
 ness of its ritual ; Buddhism initiated a set of forms which 
 satisfied the demand for guidance ; Paul supplied a dogmatic 
 framework for the ethical-religious ideas of Jesus. 
 
 It is from this non-ethical dogma and form that spring the 
 
 1 Islam appropriated and infused life into high moKfl and religious ideas 
 which were held lifelessly by the neighboring peoples.
 
 THE UNIVERSAL RELIGIONS. 39 
 
 organization and the enthusiasm necessary to a career of 
 victory. It is not hard to understand why a purely ethical 
 idea does not lead to organization ; it is too individual, has 
 too few points of contact, common to all men, with the ex- 
 ternal world. A conquering religion must be a church if it 
 is to have a visible organized victory. Purely ethical ideas 
 may spread and get control of men, but their influence is 
 silent, showing itself in the way of coloring thought and 
 deed ; they do not clothe themselves with that bodily form 
 which we call " a religion." 
 
 III. 
 
 We may conclude this sketch of the principles of the pro- 
 gress of religions by a brief mention of the actual results as 
 far as we can trace them. It is on these results that what 
 is said in the preceding pages has been based. Even a 
 bare mention of the facts will suffice to show how largely 
 these laws of progress have obtained, and what different 
 degrees of effect they have had in different nations and 
 under different circumstances. 
 
 1. THE UNIVERSAL KELIGIOXS. 
 
 It may at first be surprising that of all the religions of 
 the world only three have grown into universal form, 
 Brahmanism into Buddhism, Judaism into Christianity, and 
 the old Arabian faith into Islam. It would be more accu- 
 rate to say that only these three have developed into effec- 
 tive organizations. There may be universal ideas which 
 from their nature are not capable of giving rise to eccle- 
 siastical organizations. It has happened in the case of these 
 three religions that the circumstances of the times supplied 
 both the living ideas and the necessary framework of sec- 
 ondary conceptions. Nothing is more remarkable in the
 
 40 INTRODUCTION. 
 
 history of the establishment of Islam than the way in which 
 Mohammed fitted his transforming ideas into the existing 
 social system, with what sagacity he recognized popular cus- 
 toms and opinions, and thus made the popular life the recep- 
 tacle for higher conceptions which were destined to transform 
 it ; in a word, he combined an idea and its dogmatic ritual 
 clothing into a unity which answered the demands of his 
 time. So it was with Christianity and Buddhism. The 
 other outward conditions of progress also were fulfilled 
 in the rise of these three religions, religious vagueness 
 and emptiness around them, distinctness, organization, and 
 enthusiasm within them. We can see, as a matter of fact, 
 that the world was prepared for them. And considering the 
 complexity of the relations, the mass of conditions to be 
 fulfilled, it cannot be surprising that the number of great 
 international religions has been small. The failure of a 
 single condition may be fatal. A lack of completeness in 
 one direction may confine a religion to the bounds of its 
 own nation, though it might seem otherwise to have all the 
 requisite conditions for general extension. That this has 
 been the case will appear from a brief examination of some 
 of the failures. 
 
 2. STUNTED AND ARRESTED GROWTHS. 
 
 It may be said from one point of view that all religions 
 tend to become universal ; that is, natural growth is in the 
 direction of the excision of the local and the retention of that 
 only which satisfies more highly cultivated thought and feel- 
 ing. In fact, however, the conditions of success are so 
 numerous that the probabilities of failure are great. We 
 find a gradation in the history of religions, cases of more 
 or less serious effort to transcend national bounds, with 
 varying degrees of success or failure.
 
 STUNTED AND ARRESTED GROWTHS. 41 
 
 1. The nearest approach to speculative universality was 
 achieved by the Greek philosophy which followed Plato and 
 Aristotle, especially by the Stoics. The conception of the 
 unity of the world was practically established in Greek 
 philosophic thought at the close of the fifth century B. c., 
 about the time when the Jews were beginning to formulate 
 their practical monotheism. The Stoics affirmed the unity 
 of the world in a more thorough manner than the Jews, and 
 rather speculatively than practically. They worked out a 
 system of morals in some respects so complete that it com- 
 manded the admiration of the world, and for centuries satis- 
 fied the ethical craving of the best minds of Greece and 
 Rome. Here was apparently the foundation for a universal 
 religion, ideas of life almost completely divorced from local- 
 national conceptions. In fact, Stoicism had a great career. 
 Its ideas penetrated into all parts of the Roman empire, 
 leaving no cultivated community or circle untouched or 
 uncolored by their influence, not even Jewish Palestine, 
 so much disposed to hold itself aloof from heathen thought. 
 They were in the air, and could not be excluded. 
 
 Nevertheless, Stoicism did not become a popular religion ; 
 as a system it remained the possession of the cultivated few, 
 and for obvious reasons. It lacked the theologic framework 
 which was essential for wide popular effect. In its thorough- 
 going speculative unification of the world and its determined 
 recognition of rigid natural law, it reduced the deity to a 
 minimum, and it took no practical account of the future life. 
 These were fatal lacks. And further, in its endeavor to real- 
 ize what it regarded as the absolute good, it undertook to 
 obliterate the emotional side of man and transform him into 
 a machine for the production of right will. This will was 
 made dependent on right thinking ; thus resulted an admi- 
 rable ideal of the perfect man, whose reflections were always 
 just and his decisions rational. But it was an ideal beyond
 
 42 INTRODUCTION. 
 
 the conception of the people, practically no God, no life 
 to come, no full flow of passionate human desire. Stoicism 
 remained an idea capable of coloring the world's thought, but 
 incapable of creating an organized religion. It began in 
 speculation, and never as a system advanced beyond specu- 
 lative circles. Judaism, on the other hand, felt its way 
 cautiously, constantly keeping in touch with human needs 
 and fashioning itself so as to satisfy them. 
 
 The same thing is to be said of other Greek and Roman 
 systems of philosophy. They had their universal side, but 
 failed to take account of all the elements of life of their 
 time. 
 
 2. Confucianism has labored under a similar onesideness. 
 With a carefully wrought-out ethical system, the object of 
 which is to make the man a beneficent member of society, 
 it has scant recognition of the theological or purely religious 
 side of human nature, it is silent or non-committal with 
 respect to the future life. It is the religion of the learned, 
 but not of the masses in China. Its ethical universality has 
 enabled it to pass the bounds of its own nation and find some 
 footing in Japan and other neighboring countries where 
 Chinese influence has been predominant, but further than 
 this it has not gone and is not likely to go. Not only does 
 it lack universal-religious ideas, so that in fact it can hardly 
 be called a religion at all ; its ethical system also is largely 
 colored by national peculiarities. The State-religion, as dis- 
 tinct from Confucius's special teaching, has a defined wor- 
 ship which is not without a monotheistic tinge ; but the 
 cult is decidedly national, and the Emperor is the sole 
 ministrant. 
 
 3. In the old Egyptian religion we have an example of a 
 steady advance in the direction of both religious and ethical 
 universality, a pronounced monotheism in higher circles of 
 thought, and a very noble moral code. But this broader
 
 STUNTED AND ARRESTED GROWTHS. 43 
 
 religious movement seems not to have become national ; there 
 was no such sifting process as took place among the exiled 
 Jews ; the people remained polytheists. Egyptian ideas 
 penetrated to some extent into the Greek and Roman em- 
 pires ; in Alexandria they were doubtless amalgamated with 
 Greek and Jewish conceptions ; but they were too much bound 
 to the soil by their theologic and ritual clothing, and could 
 offer the world nothing so distinct and satisfactory as that 
 which was brought by Judaism and Christianity. The Isis- 
 cult, though it made its way into Syria, Greece, and Rome, 
 was forced to yield to a more powerful rival. 
 
 The Persian religion a remarkable and noble attempt to 
 embody in religious creed the everlasting conflict of human 
 life suffered under the double burden of a somewhat 
 complicated theology and a local ritual. That which was 
 universal in its religious conception never found distinct 
 expression, or if it did finally struggle into utterance, this 
 was not till after Christianity had got possession of the field. 
 Manichseism was an attempt to combine the two rival sys- 
 tems, but it had the power of neither, and proved an utter 
 failure. Mazdeisrn was never able to subordinate, as Juda- 
 ism did, the evil principle absolutely to the good; it was 
 half-hearted, and therefore without power over foreign peo- 
 ples. This is a part of the explanation of the inglorious 
 way in which it succumbed to Islam. 
 
 4. The tendency to universality is visible, not only in 
 national religions, but also in certain great Christian com- 
 munities, as the national churches of England and Germany. 
 These churches have for centuries embodied the religious 
 thought of the national mind, and have reflected the national 
 progress. It is always a comparatively small body of think- 
 ers that in any generation represents the advance ; but if we 
 take the Church of England, for example, it is evident that 
 it represents to-day, as compared with the Church of the
 
 44 INTRODUCTION. 
 
 sixteenth century, an avoidance of the local and particularis- 
 tic, and an emphasizing of those elements of religion which 
 appeal to all men. The same thing may be said of the 
 Church of Home, which is becoming more catholic, not only 
 in the extent of its territory, but also in the hospitality it 
 offers to broader religious ideas. A similar progress may be 
 perceived in other great Christian bodies which have no 
 connection with the State. 
 
 3. NATIONAL AND TRIBAL RELIGIONS. 
 
 The great mass of the religions of the world have failed to 
 pass beyond the communities in which they originated. This 
 remark must be understood, however, as applying to them 
 only in the comparatively advanced stage in which we 
 actually find them. The hundreds of tribes dwelling in 
 Asia, Africa, America, and Oceanica, each with its apparently 
 petrified and motionless religion, have all had their histories ; 
 what inward development and outward extension may have 
 taken place in remote times through amalgamations and con- 
 quests, we cannot tell. Nor is it possible to say with cer- 
 tainty what changes are now in progress, since we are so 
 slightly acquainted with the condition of the barbarian 
 peoples of the world. Some of them, it is known, have 
 elaborate cosmogonies and mythologies and a great mass of 
 folk-lore, implying a long development in some past pe- 
 riod. But granting the possibility of small movements and 
 growths, it is no doubt true that the barbarous religions of 
 to-day are confined within the limits of their own commu- 
 nities, and there is no sign among them of the intellectual 
 activity which is necessary to progress. 
 
 4. THE OUTLOOK. 
 
 1. The present indications are that a few great religions 
 will in time control the whole world. Buddhism, Christian-
 
 THE OUTLOOK. 45 
 
 ity, and Islam now occupy a great part of the globe, and the 
 last two are advancing in various directions. The majority 
 of barbarous religions have shown themselves unable to hold 
 their ground against the inroads of intellectually and eth- 
 ically superior faiths. Of the old national religions, those 
 of India, China, and Japan alone show anything like solidity 
 of organization and capacity of resistance, and of these the 
 Japanese seems to be not disinclined to accept European 
 ideas. 
 
 2. As between the three great universal religions there 
 can be little doubt as to where the prospect of victory lies. 
 Religion follows in the wake of social progress, and it is this 
 last that determines the relations among nations. Chris- 
 tianity (to say nothing of its moral and spiritual superiority) 
 is the religion of the great civilized and civilizing nations of 
 the world, in whose hands are science and philosophy, litera- 
 ture and art, political and social progress. European and 
 American civilization, in its gradual encroachment on the 
 other peoples of the world, necessarily carries along and 
 plants Christianity. 
 
 3. This implies that the other great religions of the world 
 will not be able to adapt themselves as systems to the new 
 social order of things. Some parts of their apparatus of 
 creed may survive, some view of life may commend itself to 
 the new civilization and enter into and color the established 
 European creed ; but if we may judge from the present con- 
 dition of the Asiatic peoples, their religions must as systems 
 pass away with the civilizations to which they belong. 
 
 4 Nor is it probable that Christianity, if it should be the 
 sole survivor of the world's religious creeds, would retain its 
 present form unmodified. It is more likely that it will from 
 generation to generation feel the double influence of territo- 
 rial expansion and inward development of thought. Having 
 the whole world for its heritage, it will adapt itself to the
 
 46 INTRODUCTION. 
 
 world's needs ; and standing always in close contact with the 
 world's highest thought, it will throw off from time to time 
 what it feels to be opposed to the purest ethical-religious 
 conception of life, and retain only that which the best 
 thought of the time demands. 
 
 The preceding sketch attempts to give the principles of 
 religious progress in general outline. That there will be ex- 
 ceptions to or modifications of such general rules is to be 
 expected. The almost infinitely diversified local conditions 
 will give peculiar turns and colorings to the various develop- 
 ments, and these form the material of special histories. But 
 amid all differences, it is important to recognize the working 
 of those general laws which both explain individual peculiar- 
 ities, and stamp unity on human religious history.
 
 THE 
 
 DEVELOPMENT OF RELIGIOUS THOUGHT 
 
 FKOM OLD TESTAMENT TO NEW TESTAMENT. 
 
 IN tracing the history of Jewish religious ideas into the New 
 Testament times, it is proper to begin with the period 
 represented by the name of Ezra. The introduction of the 
 complete Levitical legislation is a most important turning- 
 point in Jewish religious history ; it transformed the nation 
 into a church, and gave a new coloring to the whole national 
 life, or to state the fact in more general terms, it was 
 coincident with the beginning of what may be called mod- 
 ern Judaism, the Israelitish life as it appears in the New 
 Testament. 
 
 The results attained by Israelitish thought up to Ezra's 
 time may be summed up in a few particulars, which appear 
 with sufficient distinctness in the literature. 
 
 First, the nation had reached the point of practical mono- 
 theism, the conviction that in general the affairs, not only 
 of Israel, but also of the whole world, were controlled by the 
 God of Israel. This belief appears in the prophetic writings 
 from Amos to Zechariah. The prophets, as the great reli- 
 gious thinkers of the period, are its formulators and ex- 
 pounders. They were not its creators ; it grew out of the 
 necessities of the national life, but naturally took distinctest 
 shape and received best expression from the most advanced 
 minds. The approach, to monotheism was a gradual one;
 
 48 DEVELOPMENT OF KELIGIOUS THOUGHT. 
 
 idolatry was rife among the people down to and during the 
 Babylonian exile. The captivity sifted the mass of the 
 people ; the adherents of the monotheistic tendency in Baby- 
 lonia were drawn into close relations with one another (this 
 we may infer from the subsequent developments), and those 
 who returned to Canaan shared the same views. It was 
 by no means a theoretical and thorough-going monotheism 
 which was held ; \ve shall see that alongside of the belief 
 in the practical aloneness of Yahwe, the existence of other 
 deities was admitted, and the power of Yahwe therefore rep- 
 resented as limited. But happily this logical inconsistency 
 seems to have had no practical results, and after a time 
 vanished before the increasing firmness of the monotheistic 
 faith. 
 
 In the next place the nation had worked out a reasonably 
 sound and satisfactory system of practical social ethics. 
 The moral principles which we find in the prophets and the 
 law books show a high state of ethical culture, culminating 
 in the precept, " Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself" 
 (Lev. xix. 18). Only it has to be observed that the " neigh- 
 bor " here is one's fellow-countryman ; it was not supposed 
 that the obligation of love extended beyond the bounds of 
 Israel ; international ethics was no more recognized by the 
 Jews than by any other people of that day. 
 
 The organization of public worship in the temple was 
 completed by the end of the fifth century ; some modifica- 
 tions were afterward introduced, but the sacerdotal system 
 of the New Testament is substantially that of the time of 
 Ezra. The effect of this rigid organization was first to iso- 
 late the people from their neighbors, and secondly to confirm 
 and develop the legal conception of life, the idea that ev- 
 ery act is prescribed or regulated by special divine command, 
 and that the perfect man is he who knows and obeys these 
 prescriptions. The system was the essence of national par-
 
 DEVELOPMENT OF RELIGIOUS THOUGHT. 49 
 
 ticularism, favorable to intensity in one direction, unfavor- 
 able to breadth and catholicity ; fortunately it was afterward 
 to some extent modified by the conditions of the national 
 life. We are of course not to look on the Tora (as the Law 
 now came to be called) as something forcibly injected into 
 the national life from without, and intrusively moulding it. 
 The divine instruction (tora) had been gathering volume for 
 centuries, and the national feeling had been moving toward 
 the conviction that this instruction was its organic law ; but 
 when this function had been distinctly recognized, and the 
 law embodied in a complete code, it entered into the national 
 life as one of its main factors. It was by no means the only 
 factor other elements, religious and ethical, were potent 
 but this determined the form of life and the constitution of 
 the State. 
 
 One other fact must be mentioned, the form which the 
 Jewish Messianic hope had assumed in Ezra's time. The 
 term " Messianic " does not properly belong to this period ; 
 it was the product of the ideas of a later time. But the 
 hope which it implies had been long in existence ; it was a 
 natural product of the conviction of Yahwe's care for Israel, 
 a sort of belief and hope that have no doubt existed among 
 all nations, but received among the Jews peculiarly definite 
 expression and exerted a peculiarly lasting and profound in- 
 fluence. It had already passed through various phases in 
 Israel. Amos, Hosea, Isaiah, and Micah looked simply for 
 deliverance from Assyrian attacks and the happy ethical- 
 religious maintenance of the existing political organization ; 
 Jeremiah and Ezekiel, with the same hope of deliverance 
 from political enemies, perceived also the need of spiritual 
 transformation, and made a new heart the condition of the 
 era ; the later exilian prophets (whom we may group under 
 the name of Deutero-Isaiah) were absorbed in the prospect 
 of restoration to Canaan and the vision of the triumph of 
 
 4
 
 50 DEVELOPMENT OF RELIGIOUS THOUGHT. 
 
 Israel's worship over all the nations ; the prophets of the 
 return, Haggai and Zech. i.-viii., sinking down from these 
 pictures of glory to the hard realities of their present, con- 
 fined themselves to the task that lay before them, of rebuild- 
 ing the temple and securing a feeble foot-hold in the promised 
 land. The form of the expectation of national triumph had 
 varied from time to time according to the condition of the 
 national fortunes. 1 In the fifth century came a lull: the 
 temple had been built, but nothing more had been accom- 
 plished ; bare existence was all that the colony had achieved. 
 The advent of Ezra and Nehemiah fixed attention on the 
 legal-religious organization of the nation, and for the moment 
 there was neither time nor inducement to follow the glowing 
 pictures which the old prophets had given of the future. 
 The little community was undergoing a transformation, and 
 had to await further developments before it could resume 
 its outlook into the future. 
 
 It is at this point that we begin our study. We are to 
 trace the history of the Jewish religious ideas from the fifth 
 century on (going farther back when it seems desirable), and 
 to follow them into the New Testament times. While Pales- 
 tine is the centre of the movement, we shall have to include 
 also those phases of thought which we find among the Egyp- 
 tian Jews, and other Israelitish communities, and those Per- 
 sian and Greek influences which seem to have left their trace 
 on Jewish theology. Instead of taking the history by peri- 
 ods, we may trace the development of each common line of 
 
 1 See, for example, the political and religions constitution of the future. 
 Generally the nation as a whole is alone spoken of; Jeremiah (xxiii. 5) and 
 Ezekiel (xxxiv. 23, etc.) include the royal dynasty as a part of the established 
 order. An individual king as leader is mentioned in four passages, Isa. 5x. 6, 
 7 (Heb. ix. 5. 6) ; xi. 1-9 ; Mic. v. 2 (Heb. v. 1 ) ; Zech. ix. 9, all of which seem 
 to be post-exilian. The priesthood does not receive special mention till the 
 time of Ezekiel (xliv. 15); nearly contemporary is Jer. xxxiii. 14-26, which 
 is an expanded recension of Jer. xxiii. 5-8. The order is prominent in Zecha- 
 riah, Malachi, and Joel.
 
 DEVELOPMENT OF RELIGIOUS THOUGHT. 51 
 
 religious thought continuously into the New Testament. 
 This plan has the advantage of presenting each doctrine 
 as a unit, and of bringing out under each head more distinctly 
 the continuity of progress. 
 
 Before beginning the discussion it will be proper to give 
 a brief survey of the non-Christian Jewish sources of the 
 history.
 
 CHAPTER I. 
 THE LITERATURE. 
 
 1. THE LITERARY DEVELOPMENT. 
 
 THE period on which we now enter, from Ezra to the 
 beginning of the second Christian century, was one 
 of great mental activity and varied literary productiveness. 
 It offers no such sustained compositions as the second Isaiah 
 and Job, at least nothing that rivals these in imaginative 
 flight and literary skill; we have instead a multitude of 
 larger and smaller writings representing various tendencies 
 of thought, among them one at least, the Wisdom of Solo- 
 mon, which deserves a place among the Jewish classics. 
 The old isolated life of the nation, with its self-centred 
 calmness, was at an end ; the era of closer international 
 relations had begun, and this for the politically unstable 
 little Jewish community meant constant contact with novel- 
 ties, new intellectual and religious excitements and literary 
 ventures. There are few of the literary products of the 
 period that are not interesting in themselves, but we shall 
 consider them only in so far as they bear on the history of 
 religious thought. 
 
 The literary history is by no means formless. We recog- 
 nize the passage from prophecy through ritual history and 
 romances to philosophy, lyrical poetry, and apocalypse, the 
 return to history especially for the portraiture of the great 
 Maccabean era, and then apocalypse again, with history and 
 theology. A brief sketch of this development will suffice 
 here ; the material of the books will be used in the course of 
 the discussion.
 
 THE LITERARY DEVELOPMENT. 53 
 
 1. Prophetic Writings. The old prophecy had spent its 
 strength; after the exile it was no longer what it had 
 been, and in our period it is only the shadow of its former 
 self. It had successfully carried through the first great 
 movement of Israelitism, it had crushed idolatry and 
 established monotheism; and, this foundation laid, the na- 
 tional thought had turned to other things. The great legal 
 movement the ritual organization of the nation had su- 
 perseded the old spontaneous utterance of prophetic men. 
 Eeligion was becoming more an affair of rule and reasoning ; 
 the divine word, instead of issuing in burning words from 
 the souls of seers, was fixed in a book. This was not neces- 
 sarily a religious retrogression, it was rather a natural and 
 necessary progress in reflection, but it gave a new turn and 
 tone to the literature. Yet there still came occasionally the 
 breath of the prophetic impulse, though in comparatively 
 feeble form. 
 
 After the building of the temple the maintenance of the 
 worship was naturally the pressing question. About 460 
 B. c., 1 the prophet who is known by the name of Malachi 
 was moved to reprove the people for their negligence in 
 bringing offerings to the temple. Seeing in the priests and 
 Levites the hope of the nation, he predicted a coming day 
 of Yahwe which should purify them and usher in an era of 
 complete religious-moral unity for Israel. It is an interest- 
 ing point in his short prophecy that he records the existence 
 of practical religious scepticism and the beginning of the 
 closer social-religious life (Mai. iii. 14-16). 
 
 It is after a considerable interval that we meet with two 
 productions which have the clear stamp of the legal period, 
 
 1 A date before the reform of Ezra and Nehemiah is to be preferred on 
 the grounds that the Levites are not definitely distinguished from the priests 
 (Mai. ii. 4 ; iii. 3), and that the strict marriage-regulations of Ezra (Ezra x.) 
 seem not to be in force (Mai. ii. 11).
 
 54 THE LITERATURE. 
 
 and probably fall after the Greek conquest of Palestine. 1 
 Zech. ix.-xiv. is occupied with various local relations, the petty 
 States around Jerusalem, the conflict between the people of 
 the city and the people of the country districts, and looks 
 forward to a great catastrophe, the result of which shall be 
 that Judah shall be ceremonially sacred to Yahwe, and that 
 all the nations of the earth shall come up to Jerusalem to 
 worship. The course of events is marked by the fact that 
 the existing prophetic institution is expected to fall into dis- 
 repute (Zech. xiii. 3-9) ; the writer feels himself to be apart 
 from the prophetic herd, whose inspiration he connects with 
 an unclean spirit. The political and religious condition of 
 the people was lamentable (Zech. x. 12-14 ; xi. ; xiii. 2), but 
 our prophet, recalling the old form of government, has the 
 vision of a coming king, righteous and devoid of pride, saved 
 by God, and extending the dominion of Judah over all the 
 nations (Zech. ix. 9, 10). Joel also expects a catastrophe 
 from which Judah shall issue in safety to abide forever. It 
 is noteworthy that he mentions, as characteristic of the com- 
 ing time of blessedness, the universal diffusion of the spirit 
 of prophecy among all classes, young and old, bond and free, 
 male and female (Joel ii. 28-32 [Heb. Hi.], cf. Num. xi. 
 29) ; the prophesying seems to be defined as dreaming 
 dreams and seeing visions, and is introduced as a mark 
 of Yahwe's specific and intimate presence among his people. 
 Zechariah looks at the corruptness of present prophecy ; Joel 
 hopes for a revival of the true spirit. In both writers we 
 observe more glow than is found in the prophets of the 
 return. With the firmer organization of the Palestinian 
 colony came a revival of the old hopes and a more strenuous 
 assertion of political nationality. It is sufficient to mention 
 the short polemic against idolatry, entitled the " Epistle of 
 
 1 See the references to the Greeks, Zech. ix. 13, Joel iii. 6, and to the de- 
 veloped ritual, Zech. xiv. 12-21, Joel ii. 15-17.
 
 THE LITERARY DEVELOPMENT. 55 
 
 Jeremiah," belonging perhaps to the latter part of the third 
 century. 
 
 2. The complete reconstruction of the national life under 
 the control of the Law naturally led to the desire to rewrite 
 the old history from a new point of view. The books of 
 Chronicles, Ezra, and Nehemiah recount the national fortunes 
 from the accession of David to near the end of the fourth 
 century, Chronicles representing the full Levitical ritual 
 as having been in existence from the first, and describing 
 in a multitude of unhistorical details the constant and vis- 
 ible intervention of Yahwe in the nation's affairs ; Ezra and 
 Nehemiah, on the other hand, are sober in their statements. 
 These books belong not far from the year 300 B. c., 1 and give 
 the first complete historical view of the Israelitish constitu- 
 tion as a theocracy. The Greek I Esdras adds no important 
 particulars. 
 
 3. Chronicles marks a new tendency in historical compo- 
 sition. The older books, Judges, Samuel, Kings, com- 
 posed in or near the exile, had indeed interpreted the past 
 in the light of their present, and regarded it as an illustra- 
 tion of the truth that national success was dependent on 
 obedience to the nation's God. Chronicles conceives of the 
 history more distinctly as the embodiment of an idea, the 
 illustration of which is the main function of the facts. The 
 chronicler's idea was one which entered into the very essence 
 of the Israelitish thought of his time, and represented in 
 general the outcome of the history. It was Yahwe's guid- 
 ance of Israel under the government of the Law and the 
 temple-ritual. But it was natural that the idea should 
 coerce the facts. Legendary material there is in abundance 
 
 1 The close connection between the three books is generally recognized ; 
 see, especially, the genealogical lists in 1 Chron. i.-ix., Ezraii.. Neh. vii. The 
 list of high-priests is brought down, in Neh. xii. 11, to Jaddna, who, accord- 
 ing to Josephus (Ant. xi. 8, 4), held the office when Alexander came to 
 Jerusalem, B. c. 332.
 
 56 THE LITERATURE. 
 
 in the earlier histories ; but it is a natural growth which 
 has incorporated itself organically into the real history, 
 while a large part of the embellishment of Chronicles has 
 the air of an artificial addition. It may be to some extent 
 a .real traditional coloring, but seems in many cases to be 
 due to the imagination of the writer, who could conceive of 
 the past only under the form of the present, and writes the 
 story accordingly. The result at any rate is thorough-going 
 ritual reconstruction, a new nicely rounded history in which 
 the well-known characters of the books of Samuel and Kings 
 play roles foreign to the prophetic conception. The Chroni- 
 cler gained his end, his work is a literary success ; but it is 
 a religious romance rather than a sober history. Such remod- 
 elling of the old material under the control of an idea, with 
 free handling of the facts, was made possible by the literary 
 conditions of the time : there was no scientific conception of 
 the value of facts as the only embodiment of human history ; 
 there was no critical public ; manuscripts were few and little 
 read ; they were written for sympathetic circles, and having 
 obtained the approval of the literary minority, might pass on 
 to the general public unchallenged and uncontrolled. The 
 inducement was great to use the past freely as a mere vehicle 
 of moral teaching. Already in the historical parts of the 
 Pentateuch the old stories had been lavishly employed to 
 this end. There was a natural conservative desire to estab- 
 lish the present in and by the past ; and the Jewish mind 
 (it is a Semitic trait) preferred objective historical portrait- 
 ure to abstract discussion. A century after the production 
 of Chronicles this tendency manifested itself in a group of 
 works of which four have come down to us ; a larger group 
 there probably was, it is not likely that these four are all 
 that were produced, and we have perhaps a trace of one 
 such story in the episode of Darius and the three young men 
 in 1 Esdras iii., iv. The romances which have been preserved
 
 THE LITERARY DEVELOPMENT. 57 
 
 are Jonah, Esther, Judith, and Tobit ; they seem all to be- 
 long in the period from 250 to 150 B. c. 
 
 The book of Jonah embodies a religious sentiment strik- 
 ingly broad and lofty in comparison with the reigning Jewish 
 particularism of the time; it represents God as caring for 
 heathen peoples not less tenderly and completely than for 
 Israel. How far this embodies the thought of a wider circle 
 it is hard to say ; we find scarcely the trace of such a con- 
 ception elsewhere in this period. 
 
 The sentiment of Esther is precisely the opposite of this. 
 It is fierce, intolerant nationalism. Its principal design 
 seems to be to commend to Palestinian Jews the feast of 
 Purim (cf. "the day of Mardochseus" in 2 Mac. xv. 36), 
 which it represents as having been established in commemo- 
 ration of a great national deliverance. The author of the 
 Hebrew work is so absorbed in his picture of the prowess 
 and triumph of the Jews that he makes no mention of God 
 and shows no consciousness of religion ; this defect is reme- 
 died in the Greek recension, which inserts among other things 
 prayers offered by Mordecai and Esther, and a vision with 
 theocratic interpretation. 
 
 The motive in Judith seems to be merely to comfort and 
 inspire the people in a time of distress by the picture of a 
 remarkable divine intervention, by the hand of a woman 
 the God of Israel discomfits mighty enemies. The de- 
 tails of the narrative may rest on some obscure tradition, 
 but can be brought into relation with no known facts of 
 history. 
 
 In Tobit we have a charming picture of family life, re- 
 flecting the political conditions and religious ideas of the 
 author's time. It is the first example of a novel proper, a 
 tale in which the interest lies chiefly or largely in incidents 
 of every-day life. The moral lesson, however, is not lacking; 
 the religious faithfulness of Tobit is rewarded with family
 
 58 THE LITERATURE. 
 
 prosperity, and by the victory which his son gains over the 
 fiend Asmodaeus. 
 
 4. The more definitely reflective tendency of the time 
 appears in the group of philosophical works, hooks of Wis- 
 dom, which seem to have heen composed a little later than 
 the romances, about from 230 B. c. to 130 B. c., comprising 
 Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, The Wisdom of Solomon, and The 
 Wisdom of the Son of Sirach. The Jews had no meta- 
 physics, no attempts at organized systems of thought; their 
 philosophy consists of detached, practical reflections on life. 
 The beginning of this species of composition is referred by 
 the tradition to Solomon. Popular proverbs, embodying ob- 
 servation of simple facts of experience, doubtless existed at 
 an early time ; and there may have been wise men who ut- 
 tered pithy, practical sayings as early as Solomon, or earlier. 
 But the form of the books which have come down to us is 
 late; their religious ideas, at least, are those of the legal 
 period. The composition of such works implies a reflective 
 spirit which belongs, in the course of the national develop- 
 ment of thought, naturally after the prophetic period. 
 
 The book of Proverbs is no doubt the result of numerous 
 collections made at different times. Much of the material 
 in the middle portion of the book, consisting of maxims of 
 experience in common life, may be old, but it has all been 
 worked over under the influence of the late religious thought. 
 Chapters i.-ix., by their broad, rounded style, and by the 
 personification of Wisdom in chapter viii., belong to the 
 latest period of the collections ; and the hints of social and 
 political conditions in the concluding chapters suggest the 
 times of Greek control. 
 
 The social framework of Ecclesiastes is that of the city- 
 civilization of the Greek period, complicated social relations, 
 political instability, organized social-religious life. The au- 
 thor's negative and indifferentistic conception of life suggests
 
 THE LITERARY DEVELOPMENT. 59 
 
 an influence of the Greek Cynical philosophy which was 
 firmly established on the north coast of Africa in the third 
 century B. c. The way in which he combines a distinct the- 
 istic faith with a practical scepticism is not entirely satisfac- 
 tory. One would suppose that his belief in the absolute 
 divine control of things would enable him to look on life 
 with something like cheerfulness and hope ; but he sees noth- 
 ing in the world worth the devotion of the soul ; he has no 
 enthusiasm ; his highest effort is to enjoy what exists, and 
 refrain from useless longings and hopes. All things, he 
 says, come alike to all ; time and chance happen to all ; man 
 knows not his time, and is taken like birds caught in a snare. 
 When he does counsel energy and intensity in living, it is 
 from the reflection that there is nothing beyond this life : 
 " Whatever thy hand finds to do, do it with thy might ; for 
 there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor wisdom, in 
 Sheol, whither thou goest " (Eccl. ix. 10). Certain variations 
 in the thought might suggest that the book is not a unit ; 
 the epilogue, xii. 9-14, is the work of a later hand, but in 
 the body of the book the seeming discrepancies may be sat- 
 isfactorily explained as the oscillations of thought of a Jew 
 tinged with Greek sceptical philosophy, holding to his faith 
 in God and to his veneration for righteousness and wisdom, 
 but convinced of the emptiness of things, the futility of am- 
 bition, and the folly of enthusiasm. The result is that he 
 holds himself aloof from the great world, looking on its 
 feeble struggles and passions with pitying but not unfriendly 
 eye, and reserving to himself a quiet enjoyment of the pres- 
 ent, without disturbing thought of the future. The moral 
 tone of the book is high, and its general effect is to give 
 us a large view of life. It seems to have been written in 
 Egypt about the year 200 B. c., and doubtless represented the 
 opinions of a certain circle. It stands, however, outside 
 the general Jewish development; the views expressed by
 
 60 THE LITERATURE. 
 
 its author can only have colored Jewish thought in a general 
 way. 
 
 We find an equally pronounced but entirely different Greek 
 influence in the Wisdom of Solomon, orthodox Judaism 
 lighted up by Platonic and Stoic philosophy, or Platonism 
 and Stoicism interpreted by Jewish theology. In contrast 
 with Ecclesiastes, the author has warm faith in God and in 
 human life, conviction that all things are ordered by the 
 Divine Providence, that God is the Saviour of all, that there 
 remains for all men life beyond the grave, and in the present 
 life the universal divine love : " Thou lovest all the things 
 that are, and abhorrest nothing that thou hast made ; for if 
 thou hadst hated anything, thou wouldst not have made it ; 
 . . . thou sparest all because they are thine, Lord, lover of 
 souls " (Wisd. xi. 24-2 G). The gist of the book is the praise 
 of wisdom, divine wisdom, of course, the insight into 
 life which belongs to God and comes to man through com- 
 munion with God. Its personification of Wisdom amounts 
 almost to a hypostatic conception ; and there are few pas- 
 sages in ancient philosophy more eloquent than those in 
 which the author describes her being and functions. The 
 use of the book is visible in the New Testament (vii. 22, 
 cf. James iii. 17; vii. 26, cf. Heb. i. 2). 
 
 The Wisdom of the Son of Sirach is cast in a purely 
 Jewish mould and stands in close relation with the middle 
 part of the Old Testament book of Proverbs, with which it 
 agrees in general in its theology. It seems to have been 
 written in Palestine (or possibly in Egypt), in Hebrew, and 
 to have been translated into Greek in Egypt about B. c. 132. 1 
 Much of its ethical material is found in the New Testament. 
 
 1 The second Prologue gives the thirty-eighth year of Euergetes as the 
 date of translation. The king meant is probably the second of the name, 
 called Physcon, whose thirty-eighth year, reckoning from the time when he 
 first ascended the throne, falls in 132.
 
 THE LITERARY DEVELOPMENT. 61 
 
 5. In the romances and books of Wisdom we can trace 
 the general moral-religious thought of the Jews in the first 
 half of the Greek period. During the same period there 
 had been slowly growing a literature which arose out of the 
 needs of the temple-service, religious hymns, giving expres- 
 sion to national feeling on various occasions, and constituting 
 our present book of Psalms. The meagreness of the data 
 makes it difficult to trace in detail the history of Hebrew lyri- 
 cal poetry. There are one or two odes (Isa. xii., Hab. iii.) which 
 may belong to the pre-exilian time, and the book of Job is 
 placed by many critics in the Babylonian exile (though it is 
 probably later). There are some of the Psalms also as Ps. 
 cxxxvii. which seem to have been composed at that time. 
 But the theology and the historical conditions of the great 
 body of the songs of our Psalter indicate the Greek period 
 as the time of their composition. In them the ritual is well 
 established ; the nation is a church ; the wicked are mostly 
 foreign oppressors; the righteous and meek are Israelites; 
 prophecy no longer exists, but the nation is righteous as a 
 whole. Such odes must have come into existence not only 
 after the establishment of the full temple- ritual, but also 
 after the politically annihilated nation had begun to feel the 
 weight of the oppressor's arm. Some of the Psalms (xliv., 
 Ixxiv., Ixxix., and others) belong to the Maccabean period ; and 
 while in many cases there are no certain signs of date, the 
 probabilities are that the body of the Psalter came into ex- 
 istence after the year 350 B. c. The book is a most precious 
 mine of religious thought; out of it the theology of the 
 Greek period may be constructed with considerable fulness 
 and certainty. 
 
 It will suffice to mention the Song of Songs as an isolated 
 production of the Jewish literature of the period. All that 
 can be certainly said of it is that it is a poem in praise of love. 
 As it is totally devoid of religious feeling, it throws no light
 
 62 THE LITERATURE. 
 
 on the history of Jewish religious development. Its claim to 
 our interest lies in its literary charm and in the indication it 
 gives of the cultivation of nou -religious literature among 
 the Jews. 
 
 6. The preceding sketch has brought the history of the 
 literature down to about the first part of the second century 
 B. c. We come now to a group of works which, beginning 
 about the middle of this century and going on two or three 
 hundred years, embody a remarkable and significant phase of 
 the Jewish national feeling. The apocalypse was a natural 
 product of the times of Greek and Eoman oppression, and of 
 Maccabean triumph. It was born of the old prophetic hopes 
 and the present needs ; it was the interpretation which the 
 hard reality forced on the glowing promises of the past. 
 The prophets had predicted the glorious establishment of 
 Israel in its own land, under its own rulers, and the triumph 
 of the religion of Yahwe over all the nations of the earth. 
 The prophetic spirit died out ; no seers arose to kindle new 
 hope by the free prophetic portraiture of the future on the 
 basis of the present. The old prophetic liberty of thought 
 had vanished ; its inward and outward conditions no longer 
 existed. Inwardly there had come hard and unelastic social- 
 religious organization ; outwardly the political conditions 
 pressed on the people with relentless reality, the Egyptian 
 and Syrian Greek kingdoms and the Roman empire were 
 hard facts, not to be dealt with as the old prophets had 
 dealt with Edom, Damascus, Assyria, and Babylon. But 
 the popular imagination necessarily turned to the future; 
 the promised deliverance must speedily come. The feeling 
 naturally arose that the best way to comfort and inspire 
 the people in the present suffering was to paint the glorious 
 future in glowing colors. No doubt it seemed to many that 
 the set time had come; prophets had in many places de- 
 clared that the final day of triumph was to be preceded by
 
 THE LITERARY DEVELOPMENT. 63 
 
 a night of oppression, and surely there could be no sorrow 
 greater than this sorrow of Israel in the hands of heathen 
 enemies, its law, its religion, its life, scoffed at and trampled 
 under foot. 
 
 The form which these consolatory writings assumed was a 
 development of the old vision. To the pre-exilian prophets 
 the divine revelation came mostly as a clear, intelligible word 
 of rebuke or promise ; occasionally there was a brief vision, 
 as in Amos, Isaiah, Habakkuk. In Ezekiel we have a sud- 
 don expansion of the revealing picture, he sees in a vision 
 the whole religious-political constitution of the restored 
 Israelitish State. In the first Zechariah this form of reve- 
 lation occupies a still greater space ; it is in this way that 
 he presents aH that he has to say of the future (when a pres- 
 ent question is to be solved, chapter viii., he falls into straight- 
 forward discourse). The content of the prophetic visions is 
 small, and limited to the immediate future. But when, un- 
 der the Greek dominion, the Jews came into closer contact 
 with great kingdoms, and became acquainted with the suc- 
 cession of empires, it was natural that the function of the 
 vision should be enlarged ; it came to present a philosophy 
 of history, a sketch of the progress of the world-kingdoms 
 under the government of the God of Israel in the interests 
 of his people. Since the exile the history of the world had 
 been wonderful : empire after empire had arisen only to fall 
 before a stronger successor ; it was well, so thought the Jew, 
 to point out that this was only God's preparation for bring- 
 ing on the appointed day of judgment and deliverance. The 
 fashion arose of putting reviews of history into the mouths 
 of seers. It was necessary that the assumed seer should 
 live at the beginning of the period embraced in the vision ; 
 according to the starting-point, whether in the patriarchal 
 time, or during the exodus, or in the exile, or later, Enoch or 
 Moses or Daniel or Ezra or some other was selected as the
 
 64 THE LITERATURE. 
 
 organ of the revelation. This procedure was in accordance 
 also with the taste of the times, which delighted to find 
 authority for its own opinions in the person of some ancient 
 sage or saint. The symbolic form of these writings often 
 makes them obscure ; but the author's date may frequently 
 be determined from his historical allusions, and from the 
 general fact that his description down to his own time is apt 
 to be full and vivid, and after that to become meagre and 
 vague. 
 
 The book of Daniel, the first in order of the apoca- 
 lypses, traverses the period from the Babylonian kingdom of 
 Nebuchadnezzar to about the death of Antiochus Epiphanes, 
 B. c. 164. The seer is a Jewish prince, brought a captive to 
 Babylon, educated in Chaldean astrological science, and ele- 
 vated to posts of trust under Nebuchadnezzar and Darius ; 
 he is probably an old legendary figure (see Ezek. xiv. 14). 
 In different visions he portrays the four world-kingdoms of 
 Babylon, Media, Persia, and Greece, coming in the last to a 
 detailed description of Antiochus. His chronology (which 
 irreconcilably contradicts history) is based on the seventy 
 years of Jeremiah (Jer. xxv. 12) which he converts into 
 seventy year-weeks, four hundred and ninety years, for the 
 period from Cyrus's decree of restoration to the deliverance ; 
 that is, practically to his own day (Dan. ix. 24, 25). The 
 oppression is to end (xi. 45) with the death of Antiochus ; 
 the angel Michael, the guardian prince of Israel, will then 
 intervene, and the wise and pure shall be blessed and the 
 wicked punished. At this point the author, with noteworthy 
 soberness, abruptly closes his description. The book is valu- 
 able for its picture of the religious life and thought of the 
 time of Judas Maccabseus. It presents not an individual 
 Messiah, but only a triumphant people (vii. 21-27) ; it teaches 
 the resurrection of Israelites, some to glory, some (the 
 apostates) to contempt (xii. 2).
 
 THE LITERARY DEVELOPMENT. 65 
 
 The book of Enoch was composed somewhat later than 
 Daniel, to which it is greatly inferior in literary charm and 
 religious iuipressiveness. It consists of several distinct 
 parts, belonging to different periods. The original work, 
 which has the form of a revelation to Enoch, describes 
 the sin of the angels (Gen. vi.), their subsequent evil 
 doings and punishment, the places of reward for the chosen 
 and punishment for the wicked (with much astronomical 
 lore), and finally the history of the world from the crea- 
 tion to the Messianic time. A long interpolation, consist- 
 ing of three Parables, deals with the last judgment of right- 
 eous and wicked, which is conducted by the Messiah ; in 
 this section is inserted from another hand a revelation to 
 Noah respecting the flood and the evil angels. The book 
 is a rich storehouse of material in the subjects with which 
 it has to do, and not a few of its angelological and eschat- 
 ological ideas appear in the New Testament (Jude and the 
 Revelation). Its fondness for superhuman machinery comes 
 in part from its subject-matter, and is an evidence of the 
 activity in this direction that prevailed in the second and 
 following centuries, though how much of its contents be- 
 longs to the thought of the age, and how much is peculiar 
 to the authors, it is hard to say. In the original portion the 
 Messiah is a man (xc. 37), and appears after the chosen peo- 
 ple have returned to the Lord ; he is preceded by a great 
 deliverer (xc. 9), who is to be identified either with Judas 
 Maccaboeus (B. c. 168-161) or with John Hyrcanus I. (B. c. 
 135-107). The Parables give a different representation : not 
 only does the Messiah (called the Chosen One and the Son 
 of Man) conduct the judgment and usher in the state of 
 blessedness (xlv. 3, 4), but he is said to have been chosen 
 before the world was created (xlviii. 6). Such conceptions, 
 foreign to all other Jewish pre-Christian thought, suggest
 
 66 THE LITERATURE. 
 
 a Christian author or editor. The Parables draw largely 
 from Ezekiel and Daniel. 1 
 
 The work which has come down to us under the name 
 of the Sibylline Oracles is a congeries of many fragments 
 of various dates. In imitation of the heathen sibyls, it 
 details the various parts of the history of the world for the 
 purpose of introducing the glorious future of the chosen 
 people. The pictures of this future vary little from those 
 already described ; at a given moment, when the oppression 
 has become intolerable, God intervenes, destroys the enemies, 
 and saves his people. In some cases, a personal Messiah is 
 introduced. The more important pieces are found in -the 
 third book, vs. 97-210, which are probably to be assigned 
 to the middle of the second century B. c. 2 
 
 The book of Baruch is of uncertain date (hardly earlier, in 
 its present form, than the second century B. c.) and of indef- 
 inite content, containing only the prediction that Jerusalem 
 shall be restored. The thought is a reproduction of the older 
 literature, the second part (chs. iii.-v.) following especially 
 Job and Isaiah. 
 
 The Assumption of Moses is a prediction of the establish- 
 ment of the kingdom of God ; it was probably composed not 
 far from the beginning of our era. 
 
 A more interesting work is the Psalter of Solomon, a 
 collection of eighteen psalms written apparently not long after 
 the death of Pompey (B. c. 48), in a period of great depres- 
 
 1 The book of Enoch was probably originally written in Hebrew or 
 Aramaic, and thence translated into Greek ; it now exists only in an Ethiopic 
 translation made from the Greek; the best Ethiopic text is that of Dillmann, 
 Leipzig, 1851. An excellent English translation (with introduction and 
 notes) is that of G. H. Schodde, Andover, 1882. For the critical literature, 
 see James Prummond, "The Jewish Messiah," London, 1877, Schodde's 
 above-mentioned translation, and Schurcr's '* Hist, of the N. T. Times." 
 
 2 See the editions of Friedlieb, Leipzig, 1852, and Alexandre, Paris, 1869.
 
 THE LITERARY DEVELOPMENT. 67 
 
 sion (ii. 30, 31). Modelled after the older psalms, it is full 
 of cries for help, and beseeches God to raise up the righteous 
 king who shall rule over Israel, crush wicked rulers, and 
 purify Jerusalem from the heathen who are trampling it 
 down to destruction. The author's view is clearly limited 
 to the immediate future, and he seems to expect nothing 
 more than the re-establishment of the old royal regime in 
 righteousness and truth. 
 
 The book of Jubilees, which describes the primeval times 
 by periods of fifty years, hardly deserves mention here ex- 
 cept as an illustration of the delight which the Jews of the 
 first century of our era took in expanding and commenting 
 on the old history. The natural growth of embellishment 
 is clearly seen when we compare the book of Jubilees with 
 the text of Genesis and Exodus, on which it is based. 
 
 Second Esdras belongs probably toward the close of the 
 first century of our era, and is of interest as testifying to the 
 existence at that time of the expectation of the kingdom of 
 God. In its present form it appears to have been, if not 
 written by a Jewish Christian, at any rate retouched by a 
 Christian hand. 1 
 
 It will suffice to mention the Testaments of the Twelve 
 Patriarchs and the Ascension of Isaiah, works which be- 
 long in the beginning of the second century of our era, and 
 are of small importance for the history of the genesis of our 
 Christian ideas. 
 
 7. The works which go under the name of Maccabees 
 furnish, along with the history, a number of details of the 
 opinions of the times. First Maccabees covers the space 
 
 1 The date is doubtful. See a good discussion of this point in Drnm- 
 mond's "Jewish Messiah." The writer (xii. 10-32) identifies his final world- 
 period with Daniel's fourth kingdom (Dan. vii.), which, according to Josephus 
 (x. 11, 7), was the Roman, and his twelve kings are most naturally explained 
 as Roman emperors. A Christian coloring seems probable in the title " Son 
 of God " applied to the Messiah (vii. 28, 29 ; xiii. 32, 37 j xiv. 9).
 
 68 THE LITERATURE. 
 
 B. c. 175-135 ; Second Maccabees B. c. 176-162 ; Third Mac- 
 cabees B. c. 221-204 ; Fifth Maccabees extends from B. c. 176 
 to the beginning of our era ; Fourth Maccabees is a philo- 
 sophical tract on the Autocracy of Reason, founded on the 
 story of the martyrdom of Eleazar and of the seven brothers 
 and their mother (2 Mac. vi. vii.). 
 
 Two other writers remain to be mentioned. The works 
 of Josephus contain a great mass of matter respecting the 
 religious history and opinions of the Jews during the period 
 beginning with the Maccabean struggle and ending with the 
 destruction of Jerusalem by Titus, A. D. 70. It is hardly 
 necessary to say that his statements on these points have 
 to be received, certainly not with scepticism, but with critical 
 examination. 
 
 The influence of Philo (first half of the first century of our 
 era) on Christian thought was deep and lasting, though it at 
 first affected a small circle of thinkers. 
 
 2. THE CANONS. 
 
 1. During the development of the literature above de- 
 scribed a parallel movement of great importance had been 
 going on among the Jews. They selected certain books, which 
 they believed to have been imparted by divine inspiration, 
 collected them into a sacred canon, and invested them with 
 absolute authority. The effect on Jewish thought was, as in 
 all such cases, both limiting and inspiring : it established a 
 fixed rule of life and offered a body of admirable writings for 
 study ; but it tended also to exclude all other literature and 
 to enfeeble thought by the pressure of an absolute body of 
 truth beyond which the mind could not permit itself to go. 
 Embryonic canons have existed among other peoples, as the 
 Greeks, Eomans, and Chinese ; Buddhism, Zoroastrianism, 
 and Islam went further and established definite collections 
 of sacred writings ; but no people laid hold of the idea of
 
 THE CANONS. 69 
 
 canonization with so much precision and carried it out with 
 so much vigor and definiteness as the Jews. The process 
 was a gradual one : those books were first chosen which 
 satisfied the first and most pressing needs of the post-exilian 
 Jews ; and gradually, as literary and religious interest widened, 
 other works were included according to the appeal which 
 they made to the national religious consciousness. We have 
 only meagre details of the principles according to which the 
 selection of the canonical books was made. We may gather 
 that the tests were both external and internal : a book to be 
 chosen must come supported by some recognized high author- 
 ity, prophetic or other ; and at the same time it was neces- 
 sary that its contents should commend themselves to the 
 religious feeling of the best men. A book might be valued 
 for its legal material, for its ethical exhortation, for its edify- 
 ing emotion, for its historical information, or for its consoling 
 view of the future. Doubtless over many books there were 
 long discussions ; such discussions, in the case of Ecclesiastes 
 and the Song of Songs, and one or two other books, the 
 Talmud speaks of as having been carried on up to the end 
 of the first century of our era. 
 
 2. The root of the idea of a canon goes back, no doubt, 
 to very early times. Its basis is the conviction that Yahwe 
 announced his will directly to Israel through chosen men, 
 prophets, and priests. The Tora was originally the divine 
 word which came to the prophets respecting the moral, re- 
 ligious, and political condition of the nation (Isa. viii. 16). 
 As society became better organized, the need was. more 
 strongly felt for a definite system of regulations of life. 
 No distinction was made between the ethical, religious, and 
 political codes ; the nation was conceived of as a unity under 
 the guidance of the national deity, whose will was the norm 
 of conduct in all phases of activity. For the king on the 
 throne, the priest at the shrine, and the common man in
 
 70 THE LITERATURE. 
 
 every-day life there could be but one rule, namely, to do 
 those things, ethical and ritual, which the God of Israel had 
 declared to be well-pleasing in his sight. At the end of the 
 seventh century came a great outburst of nationalism, one 
 result of which was the compilation of the Deuteronomic 
 code, a collection of laws (developed out of earlier material) 
 intended to be a complete manual of life. The code was 
 naturally ascribed to Moses as its author. He was the 
 greatest name in the tradition of the olden time, he had 
 led the people from Egypt to Canaan ; he had been at once 
 captain, judge, and priest. The line of legal .traditions went 
 back to him, and the fact that there had been constant 
 accretions was forgotten or neglected ; according to the 
 historical ideas of the time, it was he who should have 
 announced the organic law of the nation. Such a law in 
 the nature of the case would tend to become finally regula- 
 tive ; the Deuteronomic code was the inception of the canon. 
 Yet that the canonical idea was not then completely estab- 
 lished is shown by the freedom with which the prophet 
 Ezekiel (Ezek. xl.-xlviii ) deals with the material, advancing 
 beyond Deuteronomy, modifying its prescriptions, and sug- 
 gesting or announcing new regulations as if he were quite un- 
 conscious that there existed a code of final authority. The 
 beginning had been made, but the end was not reached till 
 the time of Ezra and Nehemiah. Then the little church- 
 nation in Babylonia and Palestine, isolated and helpless, 
 feeling more definitely that its national life was bound up 
 with a divinely given code, accepted the fuller Levitical 
 legislation of the time as God's final word to the people. 
 The feeling of need and the law which responded to it had 
 grown up together ; and when Ezra and Nehemiah announced 
 to the congregation the new and complete set of regulations, 
 there was no question of forcing an unacceptable law on a 
 reluctant people, the proposed code seemed natural and
 
 THE CANONS. 71 
 
 necessary, and was accepted with joyful acclamation. It 
 also was of course ascribed to Moses ; doubtless to the 
 masses of that time the idea of a break in the continuity 
 of tradition never occurred. Issuing from the mouth of 
 God, having its root in the beginnings of the national 
 life, the Tora, based on and sustained by everything that 
 was most sacred in human thought, was an eternal rule 
 on which no profane hand could be laid with impunity. 
 From this time on, the possession of this divinely given code 
 was the source of perpetual joy and exultation to the Jews, 
 who believed that they were thereby forever separated from, 
 and lifted above, all the other nations of the earth. 
 
 3. The canonical idea, once introduced, was capable of 
 extension. During the remainder of the Persian period, 
 and especially afterward under the Greek rule, the na- 
 tional consciousness of separateness and sanctity steadily 
 grew, and all that bore on the history and development 
 of the people became constantly more interesting. There 
 were extant writings which narrated the fortunes of the 
 nation from the settlement in Canaan down to the exile, 
 setting forth how the people had prospered in proportion as 
 they had been obedient to Yahwe, and how he had sent his 
 prophets to instruct them and to guide them ; and there 
 had also been preserved the discourses of certain of these 
 prophets, in which Israel was rebuked for its sins and threat- 
 ened with punishment if it did not repent, but also prom- 
 ised a glorious future if it would turn to its God with 
 wholeness of heart. In process of time canonical sanctity 
 came to attach to some of these writings. 1 We have no in- 
 formation as to the grounds which controlled the selection, 
 but we may be reasonably sure that the main consideration 
 was their true national character ; those books were chosen 
 
 1 The second canon contains Joshua, Judges, Samuel, Kings, and the 
 prophets (including Jonah and excluding Daniel).
 
 72 THE LITERATURE. 
 
 for canonization which depicted the national life in ac- 
 cordance with the ethical -religious point of view of the 
 fourth and third centuries B. c. ; the prophets who survived 
 were those whose thought was justified hy the result. The 
 standard of election was high, in accordance with the lofty 
 view held of the ethical-religious enlightenment, obligation, 
 and mission of the nation ; possibly literary considerations 
 also entered. In regard to such men as Amos, Hosea, Isaiah, 
 Micah, Zephaniah, Habakkuk, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, the exilian 
 Isaiah and the post-exilian Haggai, Zechariah I., Zechariah 
 II., and Joel, there could be no ground of hesitation, their 
 general thought was in accord with the true ethical-religious 
 instinct of the nation. Nahum and Obadiah must have com- 
 mended themselves purely by their nationalism, since they 
 contain no real ethical or religious thought ; the little book 
 of Jonah, not properly prophecy at all, though it embodies 
 a noble religious conception, probably owed its place in the 
 new collection to its religious excellence and its supposed 
 connection with the old prophet of that name in the time 
 of Jeroboam II. 
 
 This body of writings was gradually brought into shape 
 during the two centuries that followed the canonization of 
 
 o 
 
 the Law. The conditions were not entirely favorable to the 
 preservation of the original prophetic words. Manuscripts 
 were copied and recopied by scribes who not only sometimes 
 made errors in letters and words, but permitted themselves 
 to introduce new material into the text, or to combine in one 
 manuscript, without mark of division, writings composed by 
 different men ; instances of these sorts of procedure are 
 found especially in Micah and Jeremiah, and the groups of 
 prophecies which go under the name of Isaiah and Zecha- 
 riah. Scribes and collectors were often, perhaps generally, 
 ignorant of the dates of the writings with which they had 
 to do ; they seem, indeed, to have attached little importance
 
 THE CANONS. 73 
 
 to author or time, being more concerned with the thought 
 and its bearing on the edification of the nation. 
 
 We have no external testimony as to the time when the 
 prophetic writings were gathered into a canon, except the 
 obscure statement in 2 Mac. ii. 13 (a book of small author- 
 ity), where it is said that Nehemiah founded a library and 
 gathered together the books concerning the kings (perhaps 
 our Judges, Samuel, and Kings), and the prophets and the 
 things of David (possibly an historical book or some collec- 
 tion of psalms), and the epistles of the kings concerning the 
 holy gifts (the letters of Persian monarchs). This statement 
 is valuable only as proving the existence of a tradition re- 
 specting the collection of the prophetical books ; one might 
 surmise from it that there were various attempts to gather 
 these books before the collection assumed the form of our 
 second canon. From the second prologue to Ecclesiasticus it 
 may be inferred that this canon was in existence before the 
 year 200 B. c., and we may assign it the approximate date 
 of 250. 
 
 4. Meantime, writings of a different order were coming 
 into existence, ethical-religious discussions, proverbs, his- 
 tories, stories, temple-songs, and apocalypses. As these were 
 not composed by prophetic men, and were not immediately 
 connected with the organic law of the nation, they were 
 relatively slow in acquiring authority. A certain literary 
 training was necessary, and a certain broadening of the na- 
 tional religious consciousness, in order that speculative and 
 emotional works which bore a distinct impress of the person- 
 ality of the writers should be accepted as part of God's reve- 
 lation to the nation. It is probable, however, that the national 
 feeling here also entered largely into the decision of the ques- 
 tion. The book of Job might be looked on as describing not 
 only the trials of a pious soul, but also the sufferings of the 
 nation ; Chronicles, Ezra, Nehemiah, and Esther portrayed
 
 74 THE LITERATURE. 
 
 various aspects of the national fortunes, and Euth chronicled 
 the beginnings of the royal house of Judah ; Lamentations 
 and Psalms expressed the national feeling and uttered the na- 
 tional prayer in various seasons of joy or grief ; Proverbs gave 
 rules of life which might be regarded as a supplement to the 
 law ; Daniel offered much-needed consolation in the shape of 
 a glowing picture of glorious triumph. In respect to Ecclesi- 
 astes and the Song of Songs there might be doubt ; neither of 
 them is national ; the first is gravely and reservedly sceptical 
 and indifferent, and the second is secular and sensuous. In 
 fact, the opinion as to these books was not unanimous ; up to 
 the end of the first century of our era the question was dis- 
 cussed whether they were edifying and entitled to a place in 
 the canon. The favorable opinion finally arrived at probably 
 resulted from the allegorizing of the Song into a history of 
 Israel, and from an appendix to Ecclesiastes which gave it 
 an air of orthodoxy. Difficulties arose also with respect to 
 other books. 1 
 
 Such was the course of thought in Palestine. It is evi- 
 dent that the choice of books for the third canon was con- 
 trolled by a somewhat stringent ethical-religious and perhaps 
 literary feeling. But other considerations, sometimes purely 
 local, probably entered into the decision of the question. 
 In Egypt the conditions were different. The Greek transla- 
 tion made in Alexandria in the third and second centuries 
 includes in the third canon not only the books above men- 
 tioned, but a number of others : additions to Ezra, Daniel, 
 and Esther ; the Prayer of Manasseh, Baruch, and the 
 Epistle of Jeremiah ; Judith and Tobit ; the Wisdom of 
 Solomon, and the Wisdom of Jesus the son of Sirach ; and 
 the first and second books of Maccabees. The reasons for 
 the acceptance of these works into the Alexandrian canon 
 
 1 The books whose canonical character was called in question were Eze- 
 kiel, Proverbs, Esther, Ecclesiastes, and the Song of Songs.
 
 THE CANONS. 75 
 
 are obvious : some of them are merely expansions or theo- 
 cratic interpretations of recognized canonical books ; some 
 are imitations of the prophets ; some depict the life of the 
 people, national or individual, as guided by the God of 
 Israel ; some give maxims for the direction of life. That 
 these works were not accepted by the Palestinian Jews as 
 canonical was probably due to their stricter standard ; the 
 legal-ecclesiastical organization in Palestine was far more 
 definite and effective than that in Egypt, and excluded, on 
 literary and auctorial grounds, much that might commend 
 itself to the freer and looser judgment of the Alexandrians. 
 And it may be added that while the term " canonical " (more 
 precisely " deutero-canonical ") may properly be applied to 
 these books (as we may infer from the consideration ac- 
 corded them by the Christian world), we must suppose that 
 it was understood in general in a looser way in Egypt than 
 in Palestine. The Alexandrian collection was probably 
 closed in the first century before the beginning of our era. 1 
 
 The remaining books, though they enjoyed considerable 
 respect and authority, were never canonized. Some of them, 
 as the Jubilees, the Apocalypse of Baruch, Second Esdras, the 
 Ascension of Isaiah, and the Testimony of the Twelve Patri- 
 archs, were composed too late, and were lacking in definite- 
 ness of thought and in literary excellence ; of those which 
 fall earlier, the Assumption of Moses and the Psalms of 
 Solomon are destitute of impressive or inspiring qualities, 
 and the Sibylline Oracles, though intensely national in feel- 
 ing, were perhaps too un-Jewish in form to satisfy the de- 
 mands of the time. Why the book of Enoch was rejected 
 
 1 Second Maccabees, which seems to be the latest book in the collection, 
 closes its narrative with the fall of Nicanor, B. c. 161, and the first prefatory 
 letter bears the date (i. 9) 188 of the Seleucidan era, that is, B. c. 124. As 
 the work is an abridgment of another history (li 23), we may allow fifty or 
 seventy-five years for the interval between its appearance and the events it 
 describes.
 
 76 THE LITERATURE. 
 
 is not clear. It is quoted in one New Testament book 
 (Jude), abundantly used in another (the Eevelation), and is 
 modelled in part after Daniel. Perhaps it was felt that the 
 book really added nothing to the existing apocalyptic ma- 
 terial; perhaps its loose and exuberant demonology and 
 astronomy made it unacceptable ; and the interpolations 
 show that it circulated for some time uncontrolled by the 
 learned colleges of Palestine. 
 
 All these works, canonical and uncanonical, are signs of 
 the times, and must be taken into account in the description 
 of the thought of the period. Perhaps the greater authority 
 in this respect is to be accorded in general to the canonical 
 books on the ground that they received wider and completer 
 recognition. Yet this distinction cannot be absolutely main- 
 tained, since other than purely religious or theological reasons 
 helped to determine the fact of canonization, and since it ap- 
 pears that some of the uncanonical books were very generally 
 and highly esteemed.
 
 CHAPTER II. 
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 
 
 A FTER this brief survey of the literature we may enter 
 1A. on the special study of the development of the Jewish 
 religious thought, the conditions that determined it, the 
 phases it assumed, and the forms it presented at the 
 moment when Christianity made its appearance. 
 
 As we have seen, the decisive step in the construction of 
 the theistic doctrine had already been taken when the com- 
 plete Levitical law was introduced in the fifth century B. c. 
 Monotheism was practically established, and the more spirit- 
 ual elaboration of the theistic conception was only a matter 
 of time. Yet the oneness of the divine person and rule was 
 not held in perfect purity. There were remnants of idolatry 
 among the people down to a comparatively late period ; in 
 the coming day of regeneration, says Zechariah (xiii. 2), the 
 names of the idols shall be cut off out of the land. This, 
 however, was apparently only a feeble survival of the old 
 practice ; it soon passed away, coerced by the ruling mono- 
 theistic spirit, and after the middle of the second century 
 B. c., we hear no more of it. 1 Perhaps the same thing is true 
 of the belief in the existence of heathen deities. In at least 
 
 1 See the curious statement in 2 Mac. xii. 40, that after the defeat of 
 Gorgias there were found on all the slain Jews things consecrated to idols, 
 and the author adds that this is the reason why they were slain. But this 
 devotion to idols, whatever it may mean, was apparently quite isolated. 
 And it is said further that Judas, mindful of the resurrection, sent a sin- 
 offering to Jerusalem and had prayers offered for the dead. There is no 
 other mention of such defection from Israelitish worship except under the 
 political and social pressure brought to bear by Antiochus Epiphanes.
 
 78 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 
 
 two of the psalms which seem to be late, a part of the govern- 
 ment of the world is ascribed to the gods of the nations 
 (Ps. Iviii. 2; Ixxxii.), and this is of course a curtailment 
 of the power of the one God. So in the book of Daniel, 
 the functions ascribed to the guardian angels of the various 
 nations cannot be quite harmonized with the absolute rule 
 of the God of Israel. The same thing must be said of the 
 power witli which Satan was credited. Not only does he 
 lead David astray (1 Chron. xxi. 1) and induce God to heap 
 sufferings on Job, but he is represented (Wisdom of Solomon 
 ii. 24) as having brought death into the world. But the 
 Jews, like other men, were capable of happy logical incon- 
 sistency ; in spite of heathen deities, guardian angels, and 
 powerful demons, they believed substantially in the alone- 
 ness of God. He was held to permit the existence and suffer 
 the activity of subordinate supernatural beings, yet always 
 to stand apart and control them for his own purposes. This 
 is also the theistic conception of the New Testament, where 
 God is clearly supreme, while yet very great power is ascribed 
 to Satan and the demons. 
 
 This idea made a great gulf between the Jews and their 
 neighbors, and by means of this sundering, helped to de- 
 velop nationalism and the whole national life. It imparted 
 to the consciousness of the people a sense of superiority 
 which produced both religious vigor and religious pride. 
 On the national thought monotheism produced its natu- 
 ral effect, it gave unity to the conception of the govern- 
 ment of the world, though it was held in a narrow way 
 so as to exclude all peoples but the Jews from the sym- 
 pathy and guidance of the deity. We may now proceed 
 to state the elements of the theistic conception a little 
 more in detail. 
 
 1. The governmental side of the idea of God was firmly 
 established from a comparatively early period ; there is little
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 79 
 
 difference between Paul's conception of the divine control of 
 things and Jeremiah's. In the literature from Ezra down 
 God is conceived of as practically omnipresent, omniscient, 
 and omnipotent. This doctrine is not held in a speculative 
 or metaphysical way ; it was simply believed that God was 
 capable of doing whatever was to be done. He controls all 
 individuals and nations : the Assyrians in Judith, the Greeks 
 in Maccabees, all the races of mankind in Enoch and the 
 Sibyl, all men, good and bad, in the books of Wisdom and 
 the Psalms. This conception is held almost unconsciously 
 throughout the whole period which ends with the close of 
 the first century of our era. There is no attempt at demon- 
 stration ; there is no sign of doubt ; and this shows that the 
 conception had become part of the religious furniture of the 
 time. 
 
 There was of course involved in this the general idea of 
 God's providential care for men. The conception of a uni- 
 versal, divine providence in the form which it is now held 
 is not found in the earlier books of the Old Testament. In 
 them it is only for Israel that God really cares ; the rest of 
 the world is treated as a mere appendage to the chosen 
 people, to be dealt with solely in its interest. But traces 
 of a broader view are perceptible, for example, in Ps. civ. and 
 cvii., and in Wisdom of Solomon xiv. 3 : " Thy providence 
 governs it [a ship at sea] ; . . . thou canst save from all 
 danger;" still there is little or no warmth in the picture 
 of God's care for men. In the book of Ecclesiastes, he is 
 sometimes represented as half indifferent to human affairs ; 
 he controls, but he feels small interest : " I have seen the 
 labor that God has imposed on the sons of men ; . . . man 
 cannot find out God's work from beginning to end ; . . . God 
 proves men that they may see that they are beasts ; . . . God 
 is in heaven and thou upon earth, therefore let thy words 
 be few ; . . . when thou vowest a vow to God defer not to pay
 
 80 THE DOCTKINE OF GOD. 
 
 it, for he has no pleasure in fools. . . . God gives a man 
 riches and honor, but not the power to enjoy it." But this 
 is the thought of a half-Hellenized Jew of Egypt, who had 
 probably only a small circle of followers. Of theoretical 
 atheism there is no trace ; practical doubt of the advantage 
 of serving God is referred to in Mai. iii. 14, Ps. x. 14, 36, - 
 an ethical-religious, not a speculative-theological view. The 
 apparently most general pre-Christian affirmation of divine 
 providence is found in Wisdom xvi. 7, where God is called the 
 Saviour of all (as in 1 Tim. iv. 10) ; yet from the connection, 
 where the author is speaking of God's care of Israel, it is doubt- 
 ful whether the phrase can be taken in a universal way. 
 
 In the later literature, God's close connection with inani- 
 mate and brute nature is brought out in a marked man- 
 ner ; see Pss. xix., xxix., Ixv., xciii., xcvi., cii., civ., cxlviii. He 
 watches over and controls the sustenance and life of all plants 
 and animals, and directs immediately all natural phenomena. 
 There is a certain warmth of coloring in the representation 
 of God's relation to nature : " Thou makest the outgoings of 
 the morning and evening to rejoice ; . . . thou dost visit the 
 land, making it soft with showers ; . . . the hills are girt with 
 joy ; . . . the valleys shout for joy and sing (Ps. Ixv.) ; . . . 
 he sends springs into the valleys which give drink to every 
 beast of the field ; . . . among the branches sing the birds of 
 the heaven ; ... he causes grass to grow for the cattle, and 
 wine that it may make glad the heart of man ; . . . the young 
 lions roar after their prey and seek their food from God ; . . . 
 all wait on thee that their food may be given them in due 
 season " (Ps. civ.). It is in the same tone that Jesus speaks 
 of birds and flowers (Matt, vi.), in contrast with the way in 
 which Paul rejects the idea that God takes care for cattle 
 (1 Cor. ix. 9). This ascription of tenderness to the divine 
 feeling for nature was the result of belief in the universal 
 divine providence, unchecked by narrow national feeling.
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 81 
 
 The Jews (clinging to the old tribal feeling) found it hard 
 to conceive of the God of Israel as thinking kindly of Israel's 
 enemies ; but there was no such feeling of hostility toward 
 beasts and birds, mountains and seas, trees and flowers. 
 Doubtless we have here an advance along the two lines, 
 the unitary conception of the universe and the broadening of 
 ethical feeling in the direction of kindness and love ; the 
 supreme God must embrace the world in that sentiment of 
 love which more and more approved itself as an ethical ideal, 
 the only disturbing element in the Jewish conception 
 being that all other men existed only for the sake of Israel. 
 
 This narrowing conception of God's relation to Israel, in- 
 herited from the prophets and ingrained in the national con- 
 stitution, clung pertinaciously to the Jews throughout this 
 period and in all their succeeding history ; it is an idea of 
 which they have rarely rid themselves. Even Paul could 
 not shake it off. In spite of his grand theorem (in which he 
 doubtless heartily believed) that the true Israel was charac- 
 terized not by bodily descent from Abraham, but by ethical- 
 religious faith in God, he returns with natural patriotic 
 illogicalness to the position (Bom. x. xi.) that the prom- 
 ises are to the national Israel ; his higher religious instinct 
 leads him to one interpretation of the Old Testament, his 
 patriotic feeling to another. It is only in the Gospels that 
 the highest point of view is attained. 
 
 The whole conception of God in the later Jewish litera- 
 ture assumes his justice. This idea was held in a practi- 
 cal, general, and imperfect form. The epithets " just " and 
 " righteous " are freely applied to the divine being, and the 
 doctrine is formulated in Gen. xviii. 25, " Shall not the Judge 
 of all the earth do right ? " This quality was assumed to be 
 part of the divine perfectness, but its content is not care- 
 fully examined or definitely fixed ; or, to speak more accurate- 
 ly, its content was determined by the ethical ideas of the age. 
 
 6
 
 82 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 
 
 The wicked and the enemies of Israel (terms which are often 
 synonymous) are hardly thought of as having rights. A care- 
 ful estimate of each human being, with precise apportionment 
 of reward and punishment according to his merits and de- 
 merits, entered only in small degree into the mode of thought 
 of the time. Yet, though the ethical details were not defi- 
 nitely fixed, the idea existed. The important point is that 
 the conception of the deity was truly ethical ; the devout 
 man could not think that God would ever violate the laws 
 of justice ; the fuller elaboration of the content of justice 
 had to be left to the better developed ethical conceptions of 
 succeeding times. Substantially the same representation is 
 found in the New Testament, the divine justice is taken 
 for granted without being formally defined. The Old Testa- 
 ment division of men into the two classes of " righteous " 
 and " wicked " is retained. The doctrine is summed up by 
 Paul in Eom. ii. 6-11 : God, with whom is no respect of 
 persons, renders to every man according to his works. The 
 apostle seems in this discussion to take the broadest ethical 
 point of view, Jews and Gentiles alike, he says, shall be 
 judged, not by their historical relation to the Jewish law, 
 but by their conformity to right-doing ; elsewhere, however 
 (Rom. v. viii.), he makes right-doing dependent on faith in 
 Jesus Christ, and practically divides the world into Chris- 
 tians and non-Christians, the first being necessarily favored 
 and the second necessarily condemned by the divine justice. 
 In this conception, great prominence is given to the ethical 
 element, the life of the believer, says Paul, must and will 
 be holy ; but on the other hand, there is a confusion of the 
 ethical and theological factors of life, and the attitude of 
 the just God toward men is made to depend practically 
 on their acceptance or non-acceptance of the historical 
 fact of the Messiahship of Jesus of Nazareth. In the 
 New Testament Apocalypse the question is treated more
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 83 
 
 brusquely: all men who do not belong to the Church of 
 Christ are regarded as enemies of God to be mercilessly 
 trampled out of existence. The Fourth Gospel conceives 
 of human life more philosophically and ideally as a conflict 
 between light and darkness ; but the source of light is the 
 historical person of the Christ, and he makes the line of de- 
 marcation between the two classes of men : " This is the 
 judgment, that the light is come into the world, and men 
 loved the darkness rather than the light, for their works 
 were evil" (John iii. 19). The discourses of Jesus in the 
 Synoptics give the purely ethical conception of the divine 
 justice; that is, if we assume the Sermon on the Mount to 
 represent his mature idea. There are passages in which 
 God's judgment of men seems to be represented as deter- 
 mined by theological dogma (Matt. xii. 31), or a peculiar 
 view of the historical kingdom of God (Matt. xvi. 27 ; 
 xix. 28 ; Mark x. 23-31), or where the old division of the 
 world into Jews and Gentiles is maintained (Matt. xv. 24). 
 "Without undertaking to decide on the genuineness or chro- 
 nological order of all these passages, it is sufficient to 
 observe that the pure ethical conception is expressed in 
 the Sermon on the Mount : the divine justice in estimat- 
 ing men takes into account only their conformity to the 
 law of right. 
 
 2. The conception of God as a being of love was of course 
 later than that which emphasized his governmental attri- 
 butes ; it was possible only at a stage of social development 
 when it was felt that love to man is one of the highest 
 qualities of the human soul. The old Israelitish idea of 
 the divine love was, so far as we can gather from the litera- 
 ture, a purely national one. Yahwe was the father (Hos. 
 xi. 1) or the husband (Jer. ii. 1 ; iii. 4 ; Isa. Ixii. 5) of Israel. 
 In the later psalms more individual relation is expressed, 
 Yahwe is said to pity them that fear him as a father pities
 
 84 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 
 
 his children (Ps. ciii. 13). Gradually the paternal relation, 
 as expressing most completely the combination of guidance 
 and tenderness, came to be employed as the representative 
 of God's relation to man : " He is our father forever '" (Tob. 
 xiii. 4); the righteous man is "numbered among the sons of 
 God " (Wisd. v. 5) ; " that thy sons, Lord, whom thou 
 lovest might learn that ... it is thy word which preserves 
 them that put their trust in thee " (Wisd. xvi. 26) ; " 
 Lord, father and ruler of my life" (Ecclus. xxiii. 1). The 
 conception of God's fatherly relation to individuals existed 
 therefore a couple of hundred years before the beginning of 
 our era, and we may suppose that it gathered force and ful- 
 ness as the increasing purity and elevation of ethical ideas 
 was transferred to the divine character. Still, it does not 
 seem to have been a favorite conception ; the Jewish na- 
 tional feeling was strong enough to depress it. It was proba- 
 bly held by a select circle of thinkers, but it was kept out 
 of general view by the circumstances of the time, the politi- 
 cal excitements, and the religious-ethical tendencies thence 
 resulting. In the Sermon on the Mount, the conception of 
 God as universal father is stated with perfect distinctness 
 and fulness. God's fatherly care is represented as extending 
 equally over the just and the unjust ; he feels for men in all 
 conditions of life and phases of experience the sympathy of 
 a tender father. Men may go to him with the assurance that 
 he comprehends and loves them ; and he, so far from stand- 
 ing apart and separate from human life, is the model of hu- 
 man action ; his perfectness is the goal toward which men 
 must strive ; and the completion of human character and life 
 is the attainment of perfect harmony between man and God. 
 This highest conception of the relation of the personal God 
 to men Jesus distinctly formulated as a practical element 
 in human life. How far it entered into the current Jewish 
 thought of the time when he began his public career we
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 85 
 
 cannot say. The religious literature of that period is jejune 
 and uninspiring, mostly occupied with unspiritual national 
 questions ; but on the other hand, the ethical thought, as is 
 remarked above, had attained considerable purity. 
 
 We must also ask how far the Jewish thought at this 
 time had been influenced by Greek conceptions. That Paul, 
 some years later (Acts xvii. 28: "We are his offspring"), 
 should quote the Cilician Stoic poet Aratus, seems natu- 
 ral from the apostle's surroundings ; it may appear more 
 doubtful whether the Galilean community in which Jesus 
 grew up could be acquainted with the thought of a Greek 
 who spent the greater part of his life at the court of Mace- 
 don in the third century B. c. It is not probable that 
 Aratus was known in Galilee; but doubtless he did not 
 stand alone in the affirmation of the fatherhood of God. 
 The Stoic Cleanthes had expressed the same conception 
 about the same time; it is hardly doubtful that it was 
 adopted by many followers of the Stoic philosophy, adhe- 
 rents of which we may suppose were found among the 
 Greeks and Romans who lived in Palestine during the two 
 centuries preceding the beginning of our era. Such an idea, 
 once announced, would naturally harmonize with Jewish 
 thought and find acceptance in the more deeply spiritual 
 circles of Palestinian Jews. Galilee was not cut off from 
 the intellectual life of the land ; in its numerous cities there 
 were to be found educated men of all the nationalities then 
 represented in Palestine ; and the intercourse with Jerusa- 
 lem was easy and large enough to allow the Galileans to ap- 
 propriate the best thought of the capital. A profound 
 thinker, master of the religious ideas of his own people, 
 keenly sensitive to all religious impressions, would inevi- 
 tably recognize what was lofty in the current ideas of his 
 surroundings. There are hints in the Gospels that Jesus 
 came into contact not only with the Jewish schoolmen,
 
 86 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 
 
 but also with educated Greeks and Romans (Matt. viii. 5 ff. ; 
 John xii. 20). The influence of Hellenists, of proselytes, 
 and of the Alexandrian Jewish thought, must also be con- 
 sidered ; every year there came to Palestine from all parts 
 of the Roman Empire men who brought with them a breath 
 from the outer world, and presumably left their traces in the 
 religious ideas which they expressed. We have no direct 
 information as to how far this was the case. But Galilee 
 must have been sharply isolated if it remained unaffected 
 by the lines of religious thought then existing in the world. 
 Taking into account all the circumstances, it seems probable 
 that the idea of the fatherhood of God was, in the beginning 
 of the first century of our era, not unfamiliar to advanced 
 religious circles. It had been slowly developing by in- 
 dependent ways among Jews and Gentiles; the former 
 reached it through the conception of the nation as the son 
 of God, the latter through the unitary view of the world, 
 and the conception of God as the ethical ideal. But how- 
 ever widely it may have been recognized in religiously cul- 
 tivated circles, it had not become the possession of the 
 world. It was the profound spiritual instinct of Jesus 
 which led him to make it the central point of his theistic 
 teaching. He discerned its dominant relation to other sides 
 of the conception of God ; he infused into it the warmth 
 and coloring of human feeling and the practicalness of 
 every-day life, and therefore he is to be regarded in a 
 true sense as its author. 
 
 3. While the conception of God as governor and father 
 was thus taking shape, there was a parallel development 
 of the idea of his personal spiritual relation to the individual 
 man. This is expressed abundantly in the later lyrical lit- 
 erature, the Psalms, and the Wisdom books: God bestows 
 on his servant a clean heart (Ps. li. 10) ; delivers him from 
 sin (Ps. xxxix. 8, 11 ; li. 1, 2) ; sets him apart for himself
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 87 
 
 (Ps. iv. 2) ; watches over him (Ps. xxxiv. 20 ; xL 11) ; teaches 
 him his ways (Ps. xxv. 4) ; chastens him (Ps. vi. 1 ; xxxviii. 
 1) ; is his salvation (Ps. xxvii. 1 ; xxxv. 3) ; manifests to 
 him loving-kindness and mercy (Ps. Ixix. 16 ; ciii. 12-14 ; 
 cviii. 4 ; cxi. 4 ; cxii. 4 ; cxvi. 5 ; cxxxix. 17 ; cxlv. 8, 9 ; 
 "Wisd. i. 2 ; xv. 1 ; Jud. ix. 11). The righteous man on his 
 part feels joy in the presence of God (Ps. xvi. 11). The re- 
 lation of the divine being to the wicked is equally personal 
 (Ps. 1. 16-21 ; Ixxiii. 18-20). In the same direction is the 
 saying attributed to the first great Eabbinical teacher, Antig- 
 onus of Socho : " Be not like servants who wait on the mas- 
 ter in the hope of receiving reward." This was the natural 
 growth of the feeling of human individuality. In the earlier 
 Old Testament literature the individual exists wholly or 
 mainly as a member of the nation, and the divine procedures 
 are almost exclusively national. A distincter individual tone 
 appears in the book of Nehemiah, and with continually in- 
 creasing prominence, until in the New Testament we find 
 each individual man expected to recognize his personal rela- 
 tions with God. 
 
 There was a corresponding advance in the conception of 
 God as pure spirit, the abandonment of the old anthropo- 
 morphic representations of his nature and activity. In a 
 great part of the Old Testament he is bound by conditions 
 of time and space ; he is attached in an especial manner to 
 the Jerusalem temple or some other shrine, and his favor is 
 gained by definite modes of sacrifice. The Babylonian exile 
 no doubt greatly helped to throw off this local conception by 
 forcing the Jews to adopt a worship which was independent 
 of the temple. The general religious growth led to the 
 establishment of synagogues about the beginning of the 
 second century B.C.; here was the minimum of form; the 
 sacerdotal element was excluded ; the essence of the worship 
 was the individual appropriation of the divine word. The
 
 88 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 
 
 temple furnished the framework of the traditional, collective, 
 national divine service ; but for his own edification, day by 
 day, the pious man looked to the synagogal worship, where 
 the visible machinery was of the slightest, and he was 
 brought face to face with God. Reverence for the temple 
 continued; but the sentiment of ethical-religious indepen- 
 dence had established itself at the beginning of our era. The 
 Law had become a rival of the temple. The great Eabbini- 
 cal teachers exerted an influence second to none in the land ; 
 the conception of the national life was no longer chiefly that 
 of devotion to the temple ritual, but rather that of conformity 
 to divine law. 
 
 No doubt the progress in this line of thought was gradual, 
 the purer view was for a long time tainted with the old 
 local conception ; in fact, the mass of men have never got rid 
 of the lower earthly way of regarding God. Nationalism 
 clung to the Jews almost like the essence of their religious 
 life. The earliest Christians Jews who accepted Jesus of 
 Nazareth as their Messiah shared this nationalism (Acts 
 i.-v.), and appear not to have separated the divine being 
 perfectly from the old traditional limitations of time and 
 space. The entrance of the Gentiles into the Church neces- 
 sarily brought about a change in this regard ; Palestine and 
 the Jerusalem temple lost their peculiar sanctity ; Christian 
 worship was performed without respect to outward condi- 
 tions, and the feeling came into existence that the supreme 
 God entered immediately into communion with the heart 
 of man. This is the spirit of the Sermon on the Mount and 
 of the New Testament epistles, and is formulated in John iv. 
 24 : " God is a spirit, and they that worship him must wor- 
 ship him in spirit and in truth." This idea may be found 
 in substance in Stoic writings, but in connection with a 
 theistic conception not definite and personal enough to com- 
 mend itself to the mass of men. Stoicism reached this view
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 89 
 
 by philosophical reflection, Christianity by the influence of 
 social-religious conditions on the Jewish national thought. 
 The national Judaism found it next to impossible to discard 
 national localism; Christianity, starting from the national 
 Judaism, found itself forced by the influx of other nationali- 
 ties to abandon the merely national point of view and to 
 regard divine worship and the divine presence as divorced 
 from human limitations. This divorcement was best ex- 
 pressed, in the language of the time, by the declaration that 
 God was a spirit, a designation which ascribed to him the 
 sum-total of the highest side of existence. The idea, once 
 announced, became a possession for mankind destined to be 
 fruitful of best results. It has not always retained its 
 purity, but it has never completely faded from men's 
 minds ; and it is to early Christianity that we owe its defi- 
 nite formulation and its establishment as an element of 
 human life. 
 
 4. We come now to follow in the pre-Christian Jewish 
 thought the tendencies toward the establishment of hypo- 
 static differences in the divine nature. In all religions 
 the complexity of the phenomena of the world and of life 
 has led to the differentiation of the supernatural power into 
 a variety of persons or agencies, the creation of a more or 
 less distinct and developed Pantheon. Such was the natural 
 conception reached in polytheistic societies. 1 But where 
 polytheism had been discarded and a substantially unitary 
 view of the supernatural power adopted, this tendency to- 
 ward differentiation of function could show itself only in 
 
 1 In the Semitic religions the feebleness of differentiation makes many 
 of the deities appear as undefined hypostases of the Supreme Power. It is 
 doubtful, however, whether we are to attach any such meaning to the Phoe- 
 nician titles " name of Baal " (given to Ashtoreth in the inscription of Esh- 
 munazar) and " face of Baal " (an epithet of Tanit frequent in the Carthage 
 inscriptions). They seem to signify some sort of identification or connection 
 of these goddesses with Baal, but their precise force is not clear.
 
 90 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 
 
 a more or less complete personification of the parts and func- 
 tions of the divine being. 
 
 Add to this the natural disposition to introduce a mediat- 
 ing power between the deity and the world. In polytheis- 
 tic systems certain subordinate deities subserved this end, and 
 the Jews gained the same result in part by the ministration 
 of angels. But as the supreme God became grander and 
 farther removed from visible things, there remained the feel- 
 ing that an intermediate power was necessary to account for 
 his relations with the universe, to explain its creation and 
 maintenance. Greek philosophical systems felt the same ne- 
 cessity, and whether theistic or pantheistic, constantly strove 
 to bring the processes of cosmal production nearer to man. 
 
 The later Judaism absolutely excluded polytheism from 
 its own conception of God, but nevertheless recognized this 
 necessity of differentiating his functions, and bringing him 
 into closer contact with man's life. 
 
 We have first to notice in the Old Testament certain ex- 
 pressions which may be considered to indicate an hypostatiz- 
 ing tendency, but never develop into anything definite. The 
 .face or presence of God is a natural representation of his 
 power and being, and in the Old Testament is embodied in 
 the form of an angel (Ex. xxxiii. 14 ; Isa. Ixiii. 9) ; but this 
 angel, though invested with divine authority, is regarded as 
 a subordinate being distinct from God. The conception did 
 not become very prominent in the Old Testament, and did 
 not find a place in Christian thought. 1 The same thing may 
 
 1 It attained greater prominence in the Targums and the Talmud under 
 the name of the Shekina, the glorious divine presence. In the earlier Tar- 
 gumic literature it does not denote an activity (see, for example, Targ. of 
 Jonathan, Hab. iii. 4), and may be considered to be throughout impersonal. 
 In the Talmud it stands sometimes more definitely for God, hut this is the 
 free, poetical representation of the schools, and can hardly he regarded as a 
 theological dogma. Here, as elsewhere, the movement toward an hypostasis 
 did not assume definite shape in pure Jewish thought
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 91 
 
 be said of the expression " the name," which is so generally 
 employed in the Old Testament as equivalent to the sum- 
 total of the divine attributes or to the divine essence and 
 glory. The later Jewish thought made the " Name " a syn- 
 onym of God, a hint of which view is found in Lev. xxiv. 
 11. The angel who is charged with the task of guiding 
 Israel from Sinai to Canaan (Ex. xxiii. 21) is the bearer 
 of the divine name and authority ; but he appears nowhere 
 else in the Old Testament, and was not adopted in succeed- 
 ing theological systems. As little can we ascribe a hypo- 
 static character to the angel of Yahwe, who in so many 
 places seems to speak and act as if he were God (Gen. xvi. 
 7, 13 ; xxxii. 24, 30 ; Judg. xiii. 13, 18 ; Zech. iii. 1, 2) ; the 
 name " angel " distinguishes this being from God, and his ap- 
 parent separateness from other angels was not maintained 
 in Jewish thought. The Old Testament angel is a de- 
 velopment out of the Elohim-beings of the polytheistic 
 period ; inferior divinities, put into a distinctly subordinate 
 position under the influence of monotheism, became mes- 
 sengers of God. It is not surprising that in some instances 
 the messenger retained a part of the old polytheistic coloring 
 and acted as if he were an independent deity. 1 
 
 These three representations may be regarded as cases of 
 arrested growth ; they were efforts at differentiation which 
 did not commend themselves to the general feeling, mainly 
 because they were rendered unnecessary by other more fortu- 
 nate attempts. We may examine a little more fully the 
 
 1 It is only necessary to mention the Metatron of the Kabbinical literature, 
 apparently an exaggeration of the biblical " angel of Yahwe." He stands 
 nearest to God's presence and will, is his supreme agent and interpreter, 
 sometimes almost his other self, yet never ceases to be a creature, absolutely 
 dependent, like other creatures, on the Creator. He may be regarded as a 
 scholastic effort to establish an intermediary between God and the world ; but 
 the conception did not definitely affect Jewish theology, and came too late to 
 influence the doctrine of Christianity. See Weber, " System der palastinis- 
 chen Theologie," p. 172.
 
 92 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 
 
 expressions, " spirit," " wisdom," and " word," which made a 
 much deeper impression on Jewish and Christian thought. 
 
 In the Old Testament the term " spirit " is employed, 
 often in a vague and general way, to set forth the seat of 
 the inward divine energy. It is a perfectly simple anthro- 
 pomorphic conception : as in man the spirit was the place 
 and source of life, thought, courage, energy, so these same 
 qualities in the essence of God were ascribed to the divine 
 spirit. It was this that entered especially into relation with 
 the soul of man ; bodily affairs, such as the guidance of a 
 nation or an individual, the infliction of a plague, or the 
 overthrow of an army, were committed to angels, while the 
 infusion of courage into the breast of a hero, or of the word 
 of truth into the mind of a prophet, was the work of the 
 divine spirit. 1 It was natural that the spirit should tend to 
 stand forth as an independent power ; but in the Old Testa- 
 ment it never attains the form of a distinct personality, 
 it is always explicable as the simple representation of the 
 divine influence. In the pre-Christian Jewish literature 
 outside of the Old Testament, there is an advance in the 
 direction of personality. In the Wisdom of Solomon (i. 7), 
 it is said that the spirit of the Lord fills the world, and 
 is in all things (xii. 1), and it is substantially identified with 
 wisdom. Philo thinks of the divine spirit as the image of 
 God (i. 207), 2 and as the indivisible source of understand- 
 ing and knowledge (i. 255, 256). The precise force of these 
 expressions will appear more clearly when we come to speak 
 of Philo's doctrine of the Logos ; but it seems evident that 
 
 1 In the earlier literature these effects are produced by a spirit (Hebrew, 
 ruach) sent from Yahwe (Judg. xiv. 6; 1 Sam. xvi. 13, 14; xix. 20), and it 
 is sometimes hard to decide whether the term means such a spiritual agent 
 or the inward being of God. The latter sense it seems to have in some 
 exilian and post-exilian passages, as Isa. xxxii. 16 ; xlviii. 16; Job xxvi. 13 ; 
 Ps. li. 19 (14) ; civ. 30; Dan. iv. 8. 
 
 2 The references to Philo follow Mangey's edition.
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 93 
 
 he is inclined to treat it as something more than a mere 
 name for divine power. 1 
 
 This is about the stage at which we find the expres- 
 sion iii the earliest New Testament writings. For Paul 
 the spirit is more than mere divine energy, yet not quite 
 a definite, separate personality. In the eighth chapter 
 of Eomans, for example, there is a certain vacillation in 
 his use of the term ; it is sometimes hard to say whether 
 he means hy it a definite person or a personification or 
 a mere influence. Thus in verses 48 the spirit, repre- 
 sented as the opponent of the flesh, seems to be man's 
 higher as opposed to his lower nature ; but in the next 
 verse, believers are said to be in the spirit if the spirit of 
 God dwell in them, where the signification of the first "spirit" 
 is doubtful. On the other hand, the divine spirit is said to 
 bear witness with the believer's spirit that he is a child of 
 God (v. 16), and to make intercession for men (v. 27), and it 
 is added that God, who searches hearts, knows the mind of 
 the spirit. Here there is a clear distinction between God 
 and the spirit. In another passage (1 Cor. ii. 10-13) there 
 seems to be a blending of the Old Testament conception and 
 a more developed view : God reveals his mystery to his 
 servants by his spirit, for the spirit searches into and com- 
 prehends God's deepest thoughts. In explanation of this 
 fact, Paul goes on to say : " Who of men knows the things 
 of a man save the spirit of a man, which is in him ? So the 
 
 1 In the Targums the expression " spirit of God " is avoided, and " a spirit 
 from God " substituted for it, the purpose being to eliminate the anthropo- 
 morphic representation of the divine being as possessing a spirit. The spirit, 
 thus separated from God, takes on a certain personality. In the Talmud it 
 is described as the source of all human enlightenment (as in the Old Testa- 
 ment), as the guide of Israel, an advance on the Old Testament in distinct- 
 ness of conception, yet not necessarily an hypqstasis. The development 
 appears to be almost identical with that in the New Testament. If the later 
 Jews had hypostatized the Memra (the Word), they would probably have 
 hypostatized the spirit also. Compare Weber, " System der pal. Theol." 40.
 
 94 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 
 
 things of God none knows save the spirit of God," where 
 the divine spirit is represented as bearing the same relation 
 to the divine being as the human spirit to the nature 
 of man ; yet the spirit as the investigator of the divine 
 thoughts seems to stand apart from God. In 2 Cor. iii. 17, 
 18, the spirit is represented both as a part of the Lord and 
 as identical with him. The most natural explanation of this 
 variation of thought is found in the supposition of an- in- 
 complete hypostasis of the spirit. The strong disposition, 
 inherited from the Old Testament thought, to isolate, per- 
 sonify, and hypostatize the divine spiritual energy in the 
 heart of man leads Paul sometimes to speak of the spirit 
 as almost a distinct divine entity ; at other times, the origi- 
 nal conception of the spirit as simply a part of the divine 
 constitution, thought of as analogous to that of man, sug- 
 gests expressions which make the spirit little more than a 
 divine influence. In other passages (as Gal. iii. 14 ; iv. 6) 
 there may be the survival of the Old Testament conception 
 of a spiritual agent sent by God. We find a similar differ- 
 ence of conception in the Synoptic Gospels. The Sermon on 
 the Mount does not mention the spirit, and such statements 
 as that of Matt. x. 20, " It is not ye that speak, but the 
 spirit of your father that speaketh in you," leave the signifi- 
 cance of the term undecided. The same thing may be said 
 of the Epistle to the Hebrews : God endows the disciples of 
 Jesus with gifts of the holy spirit (ii. 4) ; it is the voice of 
 this spirit that is heard in the words of the Old Testament 
 (iii. 7) ; believers are made partakers of the holy spirit (vi. 
 4) ; Christ offered himself to God through the eternal spirit 
 (ix. 14); an apostate from Christianity does despite to the 
 spirit of grace (x. 29). All these expressions may be under- 
 stood of a simple divine influence, but they more naturally 
 suggest a hypostatical conception not fully developed. On 
 the other hand, the representation in Matt. iii. 16, Luke iii.
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 95 
 
 22, where the spirit is described as descending in the shape of 
 a dove, involves a distinct idea of personality. The incident 
 mentioned in Matt. xii. 24-32 contrasts the spirit of God on 
 the one side with Beelzebub, and on the other with the Son 
 of Man, and appears therefore to ascribe to it as distinctive 
 a personality as belonged to them. This is also the natural 
 interpretation of the baptismal formula (Matt, xxviii. 19) 
 where the spirit is mentioned along with the Father and the 
 Son, and apparently as a separate person ; though we cannot 
 certainly infer the equality of the three, we must understand 
 the writer as ascribing distinct personal existence to the 
 spirit. The passages last cited all belong to a later stratum 
 of the Gospel narrative, and represent a hypostatic conception 
 more definite than that which is found in the utterances of 
 Jesus himself. In the Fourth Gospel, in which we have, not 
 only a later, but a more speculative " theological system, the 
 spirit appears as a distinct person, but in a relation of sub- 
 ordination to the Father and the Son : " I will ask the Father 
 and he shall give you another paraclete ; . . . the spirit of 
 truth whom the cosmos cannot receive" (xiv. 16, 17) ; "if I 
 go not away the paraclete will not come to you. . . . When 
 he, the spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all the 
 truth, for he shall not speak from himself, but what he hears 
 he shall speak" (xvi. 7-15). 
 
 There is thus an evident advance of the hypostatic con- 
 ception of the spirit within the New Testament itself. This 
 is to be referred mainly to the natural growth of the ten- 
 dency, but we must also take into consideration the influ- 
 ence of the distincter hypostasis of the Messiah. Paul's 
 idealized, exalted Jesus was necessarily a distinct person, 
 resting on and identical with the historical Jesus ; and later 
 the author of the Fourth Gospel gave distinct form to the 
 logos by making it one with the historical Jesus. The hypo- 
 static conception thus established might be the more easily
 
 96 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 
 
 transferred to the spirit. Yet a difference continued to ex- 
 ist between the two, there was no historical person with 
 whom the spirit could be identified; and it is perhaps largely 
 for this reason that the third person of the Christian Trinity 
 has never in the history of Christianity assumed so definite 
 a shape as the second person, nor played so prominent a part. 
 In the Christian consciousness the spirit has commonly been 
 a somewhat undefined, divine influence, which it was almost 
 impossible to distinguish from the workings of the human 
 soul. And this is the general effect which the New Testa- 
 ment representation makes upon us, a mighty, divine in- 
 fluence, tending to take shape in a person, yet for the most 
 part standing undecidedly between the two conceptions. 
 
 The hypostatizing process seems to have come mostly from 
 Gentile Christianity. It is feeble in the purely Jewish books 
 of the New Testament, such as Hebrews, James, and the 
 Apocalypse ; it is most completely elaborated in the Fourth 
 Gospel, the ideas of which are controlled by Greek thought. 
 Paul, on whom a Gentile influence must be recognized, stands 
 midway between these two extremes. In the more devel- 
 oped statements of the Synoptic Gospels, we may recognize 
 the influence of the church-thought which had grown up out 
 of these conditions of the times. We may sum up by say- 
 ing that the hypostatical conception of the spirit of God, 
 having its roots in Old Testament thought, took more definite 
 shape in the Christianity of the first century, partly by natu- 
 ral growth and partly urged on by the more complete hy- 
 postatization of the glorified Messiah and the Word of God. 
 
 The most striking and distinct of the personifications of the 
 Old Testament is found in the representation of wisdom, 
 which approaches the very verge of hypostasis without, how- 
 ever, reaching it ; and its relation to the conception of the 
 divine word is so close that the two should be considered 
 together. To the philosophical Jewish school of the second
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 97 
 
 century B. c., wisdom seemed the crowning attribute of deity. 
 This view rested on a conception of life entirely distinct from 
 the sacerdotal and the legal ; the former of these looked on 
 God as a power to be placated by sacrifice and ritual, and 
 the latter construed human life as a mass of actions to 
 be controlled by divinely given rules. Jewish philosophy, 
 always holding more or less firmly to the national life, yet 
 overstepping national bounds, preferred to conceive of the 
 world as a gracious, beautiful unit, the product of the divine 
 mind, bearing the impress of God's perfect wisdom. Human 
 life, in its ideal shape as a rounded, orderly scheme, was 
 viewed as an element of the divinely ordered cosmos, par- 
 taking of its constitution and governed by its laws. The 
 same spirit of perfect knowledge that filled the universe had 
 its abode in man's soul and fashioned it into the likeness of 
 the supreme goodness. For the explanation of this new di- 
 rection of Jewish thought we must look to the widening of 
 general culture under the influence of the new social condi- 
 tions. Through contact with the great Egyptian-Greek 
 world the Jews had come to a better knowledge of the 
 physical and moral sciences of the time. A certain portion 
 of the nation (probably not a large one) came into closer 
 sympathy with these broader ideas and were charmed by 
 the conception of the world as a unit pervaded by a divine 
 fashioning spirit. It was the orderliness of the universe and 
 its obedience to law that most impressed the imagination of 
 these thinkers ; and since such conceptions are not found in 
 pure Jewish literature and were foreign to Jewish modes of 
 thought, we must recognize in them the influence of the 
 reigning Greek philosophies of the day, especially the Pla- 
 tonic and the Stoic. In Jewish hands the Platonic idealism 
 and the Stoic rule of law suffered a certain transformation ; 
 they had to be brought into direct connection with the God 
 of Israel, whose thought had produced the wondrous uni- 
 
 7
 
 98 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 
 
 verse ; and this highest thought was naturally conceived un- 
 der the form of wisdom, as the highest intellectual, moral, 
 and spiritual attribute of being. Wisdom being thus con- 
 ceived as the all-potent factor in the physical and moral 
 world, it needed only one step further to personify it as an 
 individual and universal energy, to ascribe to it functions of 
 physical and spiritual creation and maintenance, the guid- 
 ance of the worlds and the purification and perfecting of the 
 human soul. Similar functions were ascribed also to the 
 divine spirit and word ; the three conceptions, standing in 
 so close relation one to another, were interwoven one with 
 another and sometimes apparently identified and confounded. 
 We are not to expect here sharp psychological and cosmo- 
 logical analysis and hypostatic differentiation. The new con- 
 ception of a divine energy filling and fashioning the world 
 took hold of these men with power ; and whether it were 
 spirit or wisdom or word that most appealed to the imagina- 
 tion of the thinker, each of these ideas would for the mo- 
 ment dominate his thought, and assume the proportions of 
 a universal energy. We shall not be surprised, therefore, to 
 find word and wisdom playing the same part in the world, 
 the functions of each being ascribed to the other ; and we 
 shall have to ask how it was that one of these conceptions 
 faded away, while the other advanced steadily in Christianity 
 to the fulness of hypostatic form. 
 
 We may perhaps regard the description in Job xxviii. as 
 the earliest example in the Old Testament of a philosophical 
 conception of wisdom. 1 The writer confines himself to de- 
 
 1 The body of the book of Job cannot be put earlier than the Babylonian 
 exile, and there are strong grounds for giving it a later date. Its elaborate 
 discussion of facts of human experience, its developed doctrine of Satan, and 
 its Aramaisms, would suggest rather the fifth century than the sixth, if indeed 
 we must not come still further down to find its true place. The book is not a 
 unit ; the Elihu episode, chs. xxxii.-xxxvii., is manifestly an interpolation, 
 and chapter xxviii. is clearly out of place where it stands. It interrupts
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 99 
 
 claring the mysteriousness of it, it cannot be found, he 
 says, in earth or sky or deep, and only God knows its place ; 
 finally, it is identified with the fear of the Lord (Adonai). 
 Here is elaborate description, which shows that the writer 
 was impressed by the idea ; but there is only a feeble per- 
 sonification, and no attempt at representing it as an energy. 
 Only it is to be noted that that which in the divine mind 
 is connected with creation and government is conceived as 
 the ethical-religious directive principle in the life of man. 
 In Prov. iii. 13-20 we have a similar personification, only in 
 verse 19 a closer connection with God's work of creation : 
 " Yahwe by wisdom founded the earth." The fuller descrip- 
 tion, viii. 1-ix. 6 introduces a far distincter personification 
 and an ascription of personal energy which shows a consider- 
 able advance toward hypostatizing. The most striking pas- 
 sage is viii. 22-31: wisdom, it is said, was brought forth 
 before the world was made, and was present during the 
 work of creation ; she stood by the side of God as architect 
 or master-workman, being daily his delight, and sporting 
 continually in his presence. The epithet " master- workman " 
 seems almost to ascribe to wisdom the direction or perform- 
 ance of the work of creation. The foundation of the repre- 
 sentation is of course the idea of the divine wisdom ; but 
 this attribute is so boldly isolated and personified as almost 
 to take the form of an independent energy. Its moral func- 
 tion is indicated by the statement that its delight is with the 
 sons of men. We can scarcely avoid regarding this as a dis- 
 
 Job's argument, introducing a line of thought quite foreign to the subject of 
 his discourse in a style different from that of the remainder of the book. It 
 is an addition by a writer of a different school, but we have only the most 
 general considerations for determining the date. There seems to be nothing 
 in the history of Jewish literature to prevent our putting it in the third cen- 
 tury B.C.; this would bring it into intelligible connection with other Old 
 Testament passages. If we may be guided by the nature of the thought, we 
 should place it in the same category with the canonical and apocryphal 
 Wisdom-books.
 
 100 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 
 
 tinct effort at hypostatization, not completely successful, but 
 a very clear indication of a tendency of thought; and the 
 passage on general critical grounds is to be placed not earlier 
 than the third century. 1 
 
 The point of view of the Son of Sirach (xi. 1-20 ; xxiv.) 
 does not differ substantially from that of Proverbs ; he gives 
 a vivid personification which does not quite reach the form 
 of an hypostasis. Wisdom is said to have been created 
 before all things (i. 4, cf. Prov. viii. 22) ; she was poured out 
 on all the works of the Lord (i. 9). and covered the earth as 
 a cloud (xxiv. 3) ; she dwelt in high places, her throne being 
 in the cloudy pillar (xxiv. 4) ; her habitation was with the 
 sons of men (i. 15, cf. Prov. viii. 31) ; she was commanded 
 by the Creator to make her dwelling in Israel (xxiv. 8). The 
 resemblance to Proverbs is obvious ; the son of Sirach probably 
 imitated the biblical book, on whose ideas he makes no ad- 
 vance. A bolder conception is found in the Wisdom of 
 Solomon. Wisdom is almost identified with God : " Wisdom 
 is a philanthropic spirit, and will not acquit the blasphemer 
 of his words, for God is a witness of his reins ; ... for the 
 spirit of the Lord fills the world " (i. 6, 7). She is a source 
 of immortality : " Obedience to her laws is assurance of in- 
 corruption, and incorruption brings us near to God " (vi. 18, 
 19). In the magnificent description contained in chapters 
 vii. and viii. the author, inspired with fervid enthusiasm for 
 his grand conception, seems to be on the verge of a real hy- 
 postasis ; he ascribes to wisdom all conceivable lovely quali- 
 ties and beneficent activities, so that in certain passages it 
 might be doubtful whether he does not conceive of her as an 
 independent power and being. She is a breath of the power 
 
 1 The introduction of the book of Proverbs, chs. i.-ix., is distinguished 
 from the rest of the book by its continuous discourse and flowing style. The 
 social evils on which stress is laid (i. 10-14; ii. 16-19; v. vi. 1-5 ; vii. ix. 
 13-18) point to the later city-life. The prominence given to wisdom sug- 
 gests a period posterior to that of the prophetic thought.
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 101 
 
 of God, a pure effluence from the glory of the Almighty, a 
 reflection of the everlasting light, the image of God's good- 
 ness ; though only one, she can do all things, and remaining 
 in herself, makes all things new. There are some striking 
 points of contact between this description and certain New 
 Testament passages. There is in her, says the author, a 
 spirit intelligent, holy, only begotten, manifold, subtle, lively, 
 clear, undefiled, plain, not subject to hurt, loving what is 
 good, penetrating, unrestrained, beneficent, philanthropic, 
 steadfast, trustworthy, free from care, having all power, 
 overseeing all things, and permeating all intelligent, pure, 
 and subtlest spirits (cf. Jas. iii. 17). The tone and wording 
 of Heb. i. 2, 3, resembles that of Wisd. vii. 26, 27, where 
 wisdom is described as the reflection of the everlasting light, 
 a mirror and image of God, omnipotent for good. This may 
 be said indeed to mark the extreme point in the advance 
 toward the hypostatizing of wisdom. Philo does not appear 
 to go beyond this. It was natural that wisdom should play 
 a prominent part in his conception of life, since it is so promi- 
 nent in the Old Testament, from which he takes the greater 
 part of his phraseology. He was also doubtless acquainted 
 with the Alexandrine Wisdom-books, and there is little in 
 his thought on this point that may not be found substan- 
 tially in Proverbs and the Wisdom of Solomon. It has 
 already been remarked that his conception of a directing 
 intermediary power between God and the world leads him 
 in many cases to a practical identification of wisdom, spirit, 
 and logos ; only he treats the last of these most elaborately, 
 dwells on it with preference, and pushes its personification 
 to the farthest point. A few citations may suffice to indi- 
 cate the way in which he treats the conception of wisdom. 
 In his discussion of Eden in the Allegories (i. 56) he regards 
 the four rivers as representing the four cardinal virtues, 
 prudence, sobriety, courage, and justice, and adds that the
 
 102 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 
 
 greatest river whence the four flow is generic virtue, good- 
 ness in general, which arises from Eden, the wisdom of God. 
 Wisdom is here the source of human virtue and goodness, 
 delighting itself in God alone, a representation which is 
 identical with that of the book of Proverbs. Elsewhere 
 (ii. 385) he calls wisdom the eldest in the creation of the 
 whole world, whom it is neither lawful nor possible for any 
 but God to judge. A distincter personification is given in 
 the passage (i. 202) in which she is termed the mother of the 
 world, through which everything was completed, God being 
 the father. It is evident that wisdom here performs sub- 
 stantially the function elsewhere ascribed to the logos, it 
 being natural, indeed, to assume the identity of the divine 
 reason and the divine wisdom. In fact, the difference be- 
 tween Philo's representations of the two seems rather to be 
 one of degree and circumstance than of essence, as will be 
 pointed out more fully below. The conception of wisdom 
 lent itself naturally to the process of hypostatizing ; it could be 
 looked on as the largest and noblest of the divine attributes ; 
 but it lacked certain conditions which were fulfilled by the 
 conception of the logos. In the New Testament the concep- 
 tion of wisdom appears in the form of distinct personifica- 
 tion, but goes no farther. Wisdom is said to be justified by 
 her works (Matt. xi. 19) or by her children (Luke vii 35) Of 
 Christ it is declared not only that in him are hid all the 
 treasures of wisdom (Col. ii. 3), but also that he is the wis- 
 dom of God (1 Cor. i. 24), and is made unto believers wisdom 
 from God (1 Cor. i. 30). Here the apostle, in his polemic 
 against the worldly wisdom of Greek philosophy, is naturally 
 led to identify the only true and saving divine wisdom with 
 the glorified Messiah, through whom God had ordained that 
 redemption should come to men. But it is still nothing 
 more than strong personification. Under favorable condi- 
 tions, we may suppose, the conception would have advanced
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 103 
 
 to the form of full hypostasis as it did in some of the Gnostic 
 systems, but it has played no such part in Christianity. 
 
 We come now to the idea of " the word," and must attempt 
 briefly to trace the process by which it attained a complete 
 hypostatical form. As the distinctest expression of human 
 thought, the word naturally represented reason, to which it 
 owed its being, and was looked on as the intermediary be- 
 tween man and the world, the instrument by which his 
 designs were accomplished. This representation was at an 
 early period transferred to the divine being. His word was 
 conceived to be the expression of his thought; and thought 
 and word were easily identified. His word was the embodi- 
 ment of his purpose and law, and might be regarded as the 
 agent which called his dispensations into being; it might 
 even be looked on as identical with the things which itself 
 produced. So mighty is the effect of the spoken word 1 that 
 the natural tendency was to personify it more and more dis- 
 tinctly, and such we find to be the case in the Old Testa- 
 ment. Throughout the prophetic writings the word of God 
 is the divine message sent to Israel to keep it in accord with 
 divine law ; it is the transcript of the divine reason. Though 
 the prophet might sometimes be conscious that it was the ex- 
 pression of his own religious feeling, he nevertheless always 
 looked on it as a powerful, objective, divine utterance. Is 
 not God's word, says Jeremiah (xxiii. 29), like fire, and like 
 a hammer that breaks the rock in pieces ? The word here 
 is merely the expression of the divine thought. In one pro- 
 phetic passage (Isa. Iv. 11) there is an approach to personi- 
 fication : " My word shall not return to me void, but it shall 
 accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper in the 
 
 1 According to primitive ideas the tittered word had an independent, ob- 
 jective existence and power ; a charm once spoken must work its effect. So 
 iu Gen. xxvii. the blessing which Isaac bestows by mistake cannot be recalled 
 (vs. 33-37).
 
 104 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 
 
 thing whereto I sent it." Activity and efficiency are ascribed 
 to the word of God in Deut. viii. 3 : Man does not live by 
 bread alone, but by everything that proceeds out of the 
 mouth of God, human life is controlled by the divine 
 word. Still more distinct is the personification in certain 
 psalm-passages : he sent his word and healed them (Ps. cvii. 
 20), where the logos is despatched as a messenger on a mis- 
 sion of healing ; by the word of the Lord were the heavens 
 established (Ps. xxxiii. 6), where the logos is the agent of 
 creation. In none of these passages is there anything more 
 than personification ; but there is the sign of a disposition to 
 isolate the spoken word as God's instrument in doing his 
 work, and as the representative of the divine reason. We 
 may here mention the development which the idea of the 
 word received in the later Judaism. In the Targums the 
 divine activity is habitually referred to the Meinra, especially 
 where the Old Testament expressions are anthropomorphic, 
 where the text speaks of God's face, eyes, mouth, voice, hand, 
 or of his walking, standing, seeing, and speaking. It may 
 be assumed, therefore, that the expression Word of God was 
 used in order to avoid what seemed irreverent in the human 
 representation of the Divine Being. But the choice of the 
 term was no doubt fixed by the Old Testament usage, espe- 
 cially from such a passage as Isa. Iv. 11, where, as we have 
 seen, an almost independent existence and objective activity 
 are ascribed to the divine word. The usage of the Aramaic 
 paraphrases may therefore be regarded as a natural growth 
 out of the Old Testament thought. The personification in 
 the Targums approaches very near an hypostasis. The 
 Memra is creator and lord of all things, the guide, punisher, 
 and re warder of Israel, and the source of the prophetic in- 
 spiration, not an angel and not the Messiah, but a represen- 
 tative of the immediate divine activity. The conception did 
 not keep its hold on Jewish thought ; it was discarded in the
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 105 
 
 later literature. Yet it probably helped the formulation of 
 the Christian doctrine of the word. The oldest of our pres- 
 ent Targums, indeed, hardly dates farther back than the 
 third century of our era; but we must suppose that the 
 germs of their ideas existed some time before, and it will 
 not be rash to assume that in the first century Jewish 
 thought had already come to look on the Memra as a sort of 
 substantial activity, intermediate between God and the world. 
 For the Jews the conception did not prove to be a fruitful 
 one ; it was coerced and ejected by their strict monotheism, 
 but it maintained itself in Christianity for reasons to be 
 hereafter mentioned. 
 
 The Wisdom of Solomon does not advance beyond personi- 
 fication when it represents the word as the instrument of the 
 divine creation : " God, who didst make all things by thy 
 word " (ix. 1). The author may have had in mind the account 
 of creation in the first chapter of Genesis, where the recur- 
 rence of " God said " naturally associates creation with the 
 spoken word (and so in the psalm-passages cited above) ; 
 but the spoken word necessarily expresses and involves the 
 divine reason. In xvi. 12 there is an expansion of the idea 
 of Ps. cvii. 20 :" Thy word heals all things." Here, as the 
 connection shows, the word is identified with God, who de- 
 livered his people and tormented their enemies, who leads 
 down to the gates of Hades and brings up again, from 
 whose hand escape is not possible. In v. 27 of the same 
 chapter is an allusion to Deut, viii. 3 : " Thy word preserves 
 them that trust thee." In the description of the death of 
 the first-born of Egypt, the author introduces a striking 
 poetical personification : " While all things were clothed in 
 deep silence, and night was in the midst of her swift course, 
 thine almighty word leaped down from heaven from the 
 royal throne like a fierce warrior into the midst of the 
 doomed land, bearing as a sharp sword thine unfeigned
 
 106 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 
 
 commandment ; it stood and filled all things with death ; 
 it touched heaven and planted itself on earth." In this 
 figure there is no advance toward an hypostasis, nor do we 
 find anything more definite in the succeeding literature up to 
 Philo, to whom we must now turn. 
 
 In the space at our command it will not be possible to give 
 more than a bare sketch of Philo's many-sided and intricate 
 doctrine of the logos. That it should involve many different 
 elements and shades, and that these should in some cases be 
 hard to reconcile with one another, and sometimes even con- 
 tradictory, is what we might expect. The Stoic doctrine of 
 the logos, reason or word, as the formative or directive 
 power in the world including human life, combined with 
 the Old Testament and later Jewish representation of the 
 energy of the divine word, had taken a strong hold on his 
 imagination. Imbued equally with the love of Greek phi- 
 losophy and with reverence for the Scriptures of his people, 
 he felt the necessity of uniting the two in one system of 
 thought. He had to hold to the rational, orderly unity of 
 the world, the predominance of law and reason, and at the 
 same time maintain the supremacy of the one Almighty 
 God. The cosmos stood out before him as the embodiment 
 of reason and as its creation, and at the same time as the 
 work of God alone. This view was supplemented in his 
 mind by the Platonic theory of ideas, archetypal forms 
 which existed in the divine mind from all eternity, and 
 took shape under the directive hand of reason in the visi- 
 ble world of nature and man. It is easy to see that in 
 so vast a scheme his attention might be fixed on different 
 points at different times, and that his representation of 
 reason or word would vary with the material with which he 
 was employed, especially as his particular line of thought 
 was often determined by the P>ible passage which he was 
 expounding. We have here only to ask whether in his
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 107 
 
 various representations of the logos there is one that reaches 
 an hypostasis. 
 
 We need not stop with the passages in which he employs 
 the term as merely equivalent to abstract reason or to law, 
 as in ii. 46, i. 456 ; let us turn to those in which there is a 
 more or less distinct personification. One of the simpler 
 conceptions is that in which the logos is the primeval type 
 of things. " It is evident," he says (i. 5), " that the arche- 
 typal seal also, which we call the intelligible cosmos, is itself 
 the archetypal pattern, the idea of ideas, the logos of God," 
 where the logos is nothing more than the divine thought 
 ready to express itself in deed. In his comment on Gen. 
 xv. 10, " the birds he did not divide," the logos occupies the 
 same position in the universe as the soul in human nature ; 
 the two intelligible and logical natures that in man and that 
 in the All he declares are necessarily each an undivided 
 whole, the logos of God standing alone, apart from the crowd 
 of created and destructible things (i. 505). This representa- 
 tion approaches very near an identification of the logos with 
 God, a step which it would seern impossible for a monothe- 
 ist to take if the logos were thought of as a personal being. 
 It is conceivable, however, that the latter might partake of the 
 divine nature without being equal to God, and something 
 like this Philo seems to say in his allegorical exposition of 
 the bite of the serpent (i. 82) : " Those who partook of the 
 manna were filled with that which was most generic, for 
 the manna is called ' what ? ' [or ' something ' according to a 
 possible etymology in Ex. xv. 16] which is the genus of all 
 things ; and the most generic thing is God, and second is 
 the logos of God." It is evident that by the term " generic " 
 he here means universal, and that in ascribing the second 
 place in this category to the logos, he separates it from all 
 other things, brings it into a peculiar relation with God, and 
 confers on it a very definite personality. The same in-
 
 108 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 
 
 ference might be drawn from those passages in which he 
 speaks of the logos as the image of God. In his treatise on 
 Moses' account of the creation of the world, remarking on 
 
 * O 
 
 the superiority of the intelligible l world over the visible, he 
 compares it to the superiority of mind over things of the 
 senses, and adds : " He [Moses] says that the invisible and 
 intelligent divine logos is the image of God" (i. 6). And 
 again : " And if we are not yet worthy to be esteemed sons 
 of God, we may be children of his invisible image, the most 
 holy logos, for the eldest logos is the image of God" (i. 427). 
 A still stronger statement is found in his exposition of the 
 cities of refuge, 19 : " But the divine logos who is over 
 these [the cherubim] attained no visible idea, being sim- 
 ilar to no object of sense, but himself the image of God, 
 the eldest of all ideal things, the nearest copy, without in- 
 terval, of the only one " (i. 561). Though such language 
 might conceivably be used of the abstract divine reason, 
 the impression made on the mind is rather that the author, 
 with his intense conception of the logos as the shaping 
 power of the world, thinks of it as a distinct personality, 
 not one with God, yet not to be separated from him in na- 
 ture and essence. The logos is the very stamp and image of 
 deity, and between the two there is no interval ; if this is 
 not a true hypostasis, it contains all the elements in solu- 
 tion, waiting only for the occasion which shall precipitate 
 them into an objective and concrete form. In other pas- 
 sages Philo attempts to define the nature of the logos in its 
 relation to the divine. Speaking of its position midway be- 
 tween God and man, he describes it as " neither uncreated 
 like God nor created like you, but midway between the two 
 extremes, in contact with both" (i. 502). To the same effect 
 in the treatise on dreams, ii. 28, where he regards the high- 
 priest as the symbol of the logos : " He, few when reckoned 
 * That is, the ideal world as it existed in the divine mind before creation.
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 109 
 
 with others, becomes when he stands alone many, the court, 
 the whole council, the whole people, the crowd, the whole 
 race of men, rather, if the truth is to be said, a nature bor- 
 dering on that of God, less than he and greater than man. 
 For ' when,' it is said, ' the high-priest enters the Holy of 
 Holies, there shall not be a man' (Lev. xvi. 17). Who is he, 
 then, if not a man ? Is he God ? I would not say so ; . . . 
 nor is he man, but touches both extremes as base and head " 
 (i. 684). That Philo thinks it necessary here to affirm that the 
 high-priest as symbol was not man, points to a very definite 
 personal conception of a power midway between God and 
 man and partaking of the natures of both. 1 The definite- 
 ness of the representation in this passage is due in part to 
 the fact that there was a human personage with which this 
 intermediary conception could be identified. The priest was 
 in the form of man as the representative of man, yet, stand- 
 ing for the whole human race, must be universal, a divine 
 man ; nothing else than such a being could act as medium 
 between the two extremes of deity and humanity. It will 
 be sufficient in this connection to mention the title " first- 
 born son," which Philo in a number of passages gives to the 
 logos (i. 308, 415, 427, 502) ; the significance of this name 
 will depend on the connection in which it occurs. Philo 
 goes still farther and finds in the Scripture an ascription of 
 divinity to the logos, though he holds that the word " God " 
 is in such cases used in an improper (catachrestic), that is, 
 an accommodated sense. Eemarking on Gen. xxxi. 12, 13, 
 according to the Septuagint text, he says : " Let us examine 
 carefully as to whether there are really two Gods, for it is 
 said ' I am the God who appeared to thee ' not in my place, 
 but ' in the place of God ' [so the Septuagint renders Bethel], 
 as if another deity were referred to. How are we to treat 
 
 1 That the high-priest here represents the logos appears from such pas- 
 sages as i. 653, 452, where his symbolic character is definitely expressed.
 
 110 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 
 
 this statement? The explanation is that the true God is 
 one, but those improperly so called are many. The sacred 
 Scripture, therefore, denotes the true God by the article, 
 saying, ' I am God ' [6 #eo'<>], and in the other case omits it : 
 ' Who appeared to thee in the place,' not of the God, but 
 merely ' of God.' Here he calls his oldest logos God, hav- 
 ing no superstitious feeling about the application of names " 
 (i. 655, 656). It is significant that in spite of the protest 
 of Philo's monotheistic feeling he here finds himself able to 
 apply to the logos a predicate of divinity which is evidently, 
 in his apprehension, not an empty sound. It is improper, 
 he says ; yet that he uses it and that he supposes the Scrip- 
 ture to use it shows that he regarded it as not wholly im- 
 proper. How can we understand his anxiety to distinguish 
 the logos from God and guard the supremacy of the latter, 
 except as an indication that the former was assuming in his 
 mind some sort of personality which partook of the divine 
 nature ? We may close this statement of Philo's view of 
 the nature of the logos by referring to what he says (Life 
 of Moses, iii. 13) of its twofold character: "The logos is 
 dual both in the All and in the nature of man ; in the All 
 it relates to the incorporeal and typical ideas from which 
 springs the intelligible world, and to the visible things which 
 are copies and images of those ideas, from which this per- 
 ceptible world was established. And so in man the logos 
 is internal and uttered, 1 the former being, as it were, a 
 spring, the latter that which flows from it" (ii. 154). He 
 adds that the cosmic logos has the two virtues of manifesta- 
 tion and truth (the Urim and Thummim of the high-priest) ; 
 the same qualities belong to the two forms of the human 
 logos, manifestation to the uttered and truth to the internal. 
 This old Stoic double conception of the human logos, the in- 
 ward reason, and the uttered word which is the expression of 
 
 1 Endiathetos and prophorikos.
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. Ill 
 
 this reason, is simple and natural. How are we to under- 
 stand its application to the divine logos ? The most natural 
 explanation is that Philo takes it in a perfectly simple way : 
 the divine reason, in its nature purely reflective, necessarily 
 utters itself in words or deeds. But so strong is Philo's con- 
 ception of the unity and divinity of the logos that he cannot 
 permit himself to divide it into two parts and to assign 
 to these parts severally the qualities of manifestation and 
 truth ; these two virtues he represents as belonging to the 
 whole logos, which is thus the divine reason thinking and 
 acting, a single conception, the personalization of the divine 
 energy which mediates between God and the world. 
 
 Philo's representation of the function and work of the 
 logos is in accordance with his conception of its nature. 
 The universe, he says, is, as it were, a flock, guided by God, 
 the shepherd and king, who has set over it his right logos, 
 his first-born son (i. 308). Here the logos is director of the 
 life of the world ; elsewhere he is presented as its actual 
 maker : " This oldest son the father of beings brought into 
 being, whom elsewhere he named the first- begotten, and who, 
 though begotten, yet imitating the ways of his father, and 
 looking to his archetypal norms, gave shape to species" 
 (i. 414, 415). He is further described as putting on the 
 world as a garment and as the bond which holds all 
 things together (i. 562), as the driver of the powers which 
 control the world (i. 560, 561). In a striking passage in the 
 tract on The Heir of Divine Things, 42, the logos is dis- 
 tinctly portrayed as mediator between God and man : " On 
 the archangel and eldest logos the father, who begat all things, 
 bestowed this choice gift, that he should stand on the border 
 and separate the created from the Creator. He is a suppliant 
 in behalf of the mortal for immortality, and the ambassador 
 of the king for obedience, . . . being neither unbegotten like 
 God nor begotten like you, but midway between the two ex-
 
 112 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 
 
 tremes, bordering on both, appealing to the Creator in faith 
 that he will never destroy the world, and offering to the 
 creature the hope that the merciful God will never disregard 
 his own work " (i. 501, 502). Such representations may no 
 doubt be understood of the abstract divine reason ; but their 
 frequency and distinctness rather suggest a desire and effort 
 after a separate personality. 
 
 It must be added that Philo has other representations of 
 the logos. He declares that God needed no assistant in 
 creation (i. 5), that in this work he stood alone (i. 66). The 
 world is said to be founded on the divine word (i. 7, 8), and 
 indeed to be the word (i. 4, 5, 630). The distinctness of the 
 logos from God is affirmed in a number of passages (i. 6, 128, 
 625, 655). Its functions are sometimes nearly identical with 
 those of the spirit and of wisdom. There may be many 
 logoi, the laws of God (i. 128). Philo's use of the term 
 is so various that one may construct from his works any 
 logos-theory that one pleases. This variety of use, as is 
 remarked above, is just what we should expect from the 
 vastness of the conception with which the philosopher's 
 mind was filled, and the diversity of the sources from which 
 he drew his material. A Jewish monotheist expounding the 
 Hebrew Scriptures after Platonic and Stoic principles might 
 well occasionally differ from himself. Yet in spite of diver- 
 sities, there is a very serious and persistent unity in his por- 
 traiture of the logos as the divine shaper and director of all 
 things, the mediator between God and the world. To this 
 conception the author ever returns with greatest fondness. 
 There is a certain pantheistic element in his thought : the 
 world is the logos, for it is nothing but the utterance of the 
 divine reason, a view which resulted from the author's deter- 
 mination to grasp the unity of the universe. Again, the 
 logos, though all-powerful, is the creature of God and subor- 
 dinate to him, a Jewish monotheist could take no other
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 113 
 
 view. All through these variations of the theme the central 
 idea of the logos as a substantially diviiie personality makes 
 itself heard with greater or less distinctness. This is the 
 idea which is constantly striving to take shape in Philo's 
 mind, though it is often jostled or excluded by other con- 
 ceptions held with equal firmness. He was not in position 
 to conceive a complete hypostatizatiou of the logos. If there 
 had been any visible historical person to which to attach 
 the idea, it might have been different ; it was hard to elevate 
 an abstract conception to the position of a person. 1 The 
 same difficulty existed in the case of wisdom, and to a less 
 degree in the efforts at hypostatizing the spirit. Philo seems 
 to have gone as far as was possible for him under the cir- 
 cumstances ; his feeling of the necessity of an intermedi- 
 ate power between God and the world led him to treat the 
 logos as much more than an abstract conception, though it 
 is not possible to say that he made it an absolutely dis- 
 tinct personality. 
 
 His preference for this expression for the mediating power 
 
 1 It does not appear that Philo identifies the logos with the Messiah, or 
 even that he mentions a Messiah ; the passages cited as referring to the Mes- 
 siah (ii. 423, 436) hardly bear this interpretation. The first (which occurs in 
 a description of the final defeat of evil men) reads : " For a man shall go forth, 
 says the oracle [Num. xxiv. 7], at the head of an army . . . and shall conquer 
 great and populous nations." But this " man," as Oehler (quoted by Drum- 
 mond) remarks, is immediately explained as a symbol of courage and strength, 
 and in fact is not again mentioned. He does not play the role of a Messiah, 
 and he is by no word brought into connection with the logos. The second 
 passage, describing the return of the scattered Jews to their own land, says 
 that they shall be led "by a certain appearance (5\f/e&s) more divine than 
 human," which shall be invisible to all but those who are being saved. This 
 can hardly mean the Messiah, who would certainly not be invisible to his 
 enemies ; nor is it in this way that Philo speaks of the logos The " appear- 
 ance " seems to be an allusion to the pillar of cloud and fire (Ex. xiv. 20), a 
 general guidance by God ; there is no mention of a person, human or divine, 
 as leader. He goes on to say that the people will have three intercessors with 
 God, the goodness of God himself, the holiness of their ancestors, and their 
 own improvement; this assumes the ordinary national life, and does not 
 favor the supposition of salvation by Messiah or logos.
 
 114 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 
 
 was doubtless determined by the usage of the Stoic philos- 
 ophy. The Old Testament offered other terms which might 
 have been chosen, such as wisdom, glory, spirit, presence. 
 But Philo's philosophic studies would naturally fix his atten- 
 tion on this particular expression, which, besides, best accorded 
 with the tendencies of the Greco-Jewish philosophy of the 
 time. That which most appealed to one part of the thought 
 of the age was not so much the divine power or goodness, or 
 the spiritual relation between man and God, as the concep- 
 tion of law and reason in the government of the world. 
 The term " logos " offered a fulness of meaning which could 
 not be found in any other expression. It represented the 
 absolute reason, and at the same time the utterance or ob- 
 jective expression of this reason. It was anthropomorphic 
 and in a sort anthropocentric, but in the grandest and purest 
 way. It glorified reason, but attached it inseparably to the 
 ideal divine. It gave unity to the world without impairing 
 the aloneness of God or the independence of man. It was, in 
 addition, an expression of the Hebrew Scriptures, invested 
 with peculiar sacredness by prophets, psalmists, and Law. 
 It would not be a matter of surprise, then, if the idea got a 
 strong hold on those Jews who were acquainted with Hel- 
 lenizing philosophical thought. We are not informed how 
 far Philo's writings were known outside of Egypt, but such 
 ideas could not easily be kept within the limits of one land ; 
 in their general outline, indeed, they belonged to a school of 
 thought, and would be likely to have their representatives all 
 over Hellenized Asia. But so far as we know, it was he who 
 fused the Stoic conception with the Old Testament thought 
 into a theological system which might commend itself to 
 orthodox monotheists. It was he who made the rational 
 word the only begotten Son, the image and the agent of the 
 one only true God and Father, standing midway between the 
 extremes of the divine and the human, in contact with both.
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 115 
 
 Within a century after the composition of Philo's works 
 there appeared a Christian book in which Jesus of Nazareth 
 was identified with the logos. 1 The resemblances between 
 the representations of the word in Philo and the Fourth 
 Gospel lie on the surface. If we leave out the fact of incar- 
 nation, there is nothing in the latter that is not found in the 
 former. The Gospel describes the logos as having existed 
 in the beginning in the presence of God, partaking of the 
 divine nature, and as having been the sole agent in the divine 
 creation ; he is declared to be the only begotten Son of God, 
 the source of life to men. Eeference to the quotations above 
 given will show that all these elements of the conception are 
 contained in Philo's representation. The distinction which 
 the latter makes, by the insertion or omission of the article, 
 between the absolute divine being and the divine nature 
 possessed by the logos is made also in the first verse of the 
 Gospel. The evangelist seems to be concerned, like Philo, 
 while ascribing the largest divine powers to the logos, yet to 
 keep intact the substantial aloneness of God himself. He 
 declares, according to one reading of the text (John i. 18) : 
 " No one has ever seen God ; the only begotten Son who is 
 in the bosom of the Father, he has declared him," a state- 
 
 1 This is a sufficiently definite statement of the date of the Fourth Gospel 
 for our purposes. It is impossible here to go into a discussion of the numer- 
 ous and intricate questions connected with the investigation of the origin of 
 this Gospel. The church tradition assigns the work to the closing years of 
 the first century, and Justin Martyr appears to have been acquainted with it. 
 From these data we might place it between the years 100 and 130, and there 
 is nothing in the book itself to make such a date improbable ; at the distance 
 of nearly a century from the death of Jesus, such an idealizing portrait of him 
 would be not unnatural, and the existence of the Grecizing tendency of 
 thought among the Jews at that time is vouched for by the works of Philo 
 We are not here called on to decide how far the author of the Fourth Gospel 
 used the other gospels, or in general how far an historical tradition lay at the 
 basis of his work ; we have to accept the book simply as a product of the first 
 part of the second century, made up of Christian material shaped under the 
 influence of Jewish-Greek philosophy.
 
 116 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 
 
 ment which forms the gist of Philo's description, in which 
 the logos is the utterance and declaration of the invisible 
 God. Another reading of the Gospel passage has " the only 
 begotten God " instead of " the only begotten Son ; " as to 
 this (which on its face and in the connection is less likely 
 than the other) we can only say that it still makes a clear 
 distinction between this only begotten divine person and the 
 absolute " God," who is invisible, a distinction likewise 
 found in Philo. 
 
 The decisive difference between the Alexandrian philoso- 
 pher and the Gospel is that for the latter the logos is incar- 
 nate in the person of Jesus of Nazareth. We have seen that 
 Philo did not identify the logos with the Messiah or any 
 other man. It is no doubt the failure of such an identifica- 
 tion that gives a wavering and indistinct character to his 
 conception, and deprives it of the roundness and objective 
 power which resides in a visible historical form. This was 
 the great advantage enjoyed by the Christian writer over the 
 Jewish philosopher, the presence of a man in whom the 
 logos could be seen ; this was the condition necessary for the 
 final and complete hypostatization of the conception. 
 
 We cannot trace in minute detail the steps by which the 
 historical Jesus became one in Christian thought with the 
 divine Word, but we may discern the broad outlines of the 
 movement. The two elements of the process of identification 
 are : the gradual idealizing of the person of Jesus, and the 
 acceptance by a part of the Christian world of the Greek 
 philosophy as adapted to monotheistic ideas by the Alexan- 
 drian Jews. The latter of these elements we may consider 
 to have begun with the establishment of the Philonic system. 
 As has already been remarked, there is nothing to prevent 
 our supposing that its central point the conception of a 
 divine, rational word mediating between God and the world, 
 had obtained a footing in Asia Minor, where the Fourth
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 117 
 
 Gospel is described by the tradition as having originated. 
 There Philo's works may have been known, or the substance 
 of them may have been discussed in philosophizing circles. 
 To a Christian work embodying this conception a certain 
 definiteness and simplicity would be given by the historical 
 personage of Jesus. There would be no need of metaphysical 
 subtlety or indistinctness. The divine word, spoken of in 
 the Old Testament, and elaborated in Alexandria, out of 
 Old Testament material, had appeared in visible form. The 
 author of the Fourth Gospel, after in the beginning of his 
 work identifying Jesus with the logos, does not return to the 
 subject ; he contents himself with the portrayal of him as 
 the principle of light and life in the world, combating dark- 
 ness and death. The evangelist necessarily treats his subject 
 with freedom and independence. What especially interests 
 him is to point out how Jesus, in the midst of the darkened, 
 unbelieving world, asserts himself as the absolute truth, as 
 the manifestation of the Father with whom he is one, to 
 whom, nevertheless, he is subordinate, without whom he 
 can do nothing, by whom he has been sent on a mission of 
 eternal life, through whose power and direction they who 
 have been chosen come to the Son and believe on him unto 
 eternal life. 
 
 But while in the choice of the term " logos " we must recog- 
 nize the connection between the Fourth Gospel and the 
 Alexandrian philosophy, it is also true that in other Chris- 
 tian circles during the first century the person of Jesus had 
 been steadily growing in dignity. We have no means of 
 tracing the development of Paul's thought between his con- 
 version and the first of his epistles ; but from the beginning 
 he seems to have conceived of Jesus as the glorified Messiah 
 invested by God with supreme authority for the salvation of 
 men. On Christ's earthly life Paul laid little stress. A few 
 times he mentions his birth as a man (Gal. iv. 4 ; Rom. i. 3),
 
 118 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 
 
 his sacrificial death (Gal. i. 4 ; 2 Cor. v. 21 ; 1 Cor. v. 7), and 
 very often his resuneetion from the dead. On this last point 
 he dwells with preference; it is his real starting-point for 
 Christ's work. The glorified Jesus is the Son of God, who 
 dwelt from the beginning with the Father, who laid aside 
 his riches and glory that he might become the Saviour of 
 men (2 Cor. ii. 9 ; Phil ii 6-9) ; he is the power of God and 
 the wisdom of God (1 Cor. i. 24), the Saviour and Lord of 
 believers. On the other hand, he is distinguished from and 
 subordinated to God; there is one God, the Father, and one 
 Lord Jesus Christ (1 Cor. viii. 6), and at the end he shall de- 
 liver up his kingdom to God and be subjected to him who 
 subjected all things to him, that God may be all in all (1 Cor. 
 xv. 24-28). Paul's view doubtless arose from the combina- 
 tion of his Old Testament monotheism with his exalted con- 
 ception of the spiritual function of the Messiah. Jesus he 
 believed had been raised from the dead to reconcile men to 
 God ; such a task demanded the noblest personality and the 
 largest authority compatible with the aloneness of God. 
 Jesus is supreme in the Church, but he derives all his au- 
 thority from the Father. This view may have so leavened 
 Christian opinion as to prepare the way for the preciser 
 statement of the Fourth Gospel. It is, in fact, itself a long 
 step toward a complete hypostatization. Jesus, according 
 to Paul's view, is far above all other beings except God, 
 one with him in purpose and act, only less than he in the 
 universe. 
 
 In this connection we must mention the representations of 
 Jesus given in Hebrews, Ephesians, and Colossians, in which 
 the influence of the Greek thought seems recognizable. 
 The expressions in Heb. i. 2, 3, in which the Son is God's 
 agent in creation, the effulgence of his glory and the image 
 of his substance, remind us of the Fourth Gospel and Philo ; l 
 
 1 And see Wisdom of Solomon, vii. 26.
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 119 
 
 and here also the Son receives this glory by the appointment 
 of the Father, that he may become the Saviour of believers. 
 In Ephesians and Colossiaus Christ, while his function in 
 the Church is substantially identical with the teaching of the 
 Pauline epistles, is conceived in a more philosophical and 
 ideal way ; in him all things in the universe are summed up 
 (Eph. i. 10) ; he is the image of the invisible God, the first- 
 born of all creation ; through him all things were made, and 
 in him they consist ; he possesses all the treasures of wisdom 
 and knowledge, and in him dwells all the fulness of the God- 
 head bodily ; he is seated at the right hand of God ; he is the 
 life of believers, who shall share in the glory of his manifes- 
 tation. These expressions we are warranted in interpreting 
 in accordance with the spirit of Paul and of Hebrews : Christ, 
 being the sum of the universe, and having in him all the ful- 
 ness of the Godhead, is yet to be distinguished from God, 
 from whom he derives his authority, and on whose aloneness 
 he does not impinge. These epistles we may regard as hav- 
 ing been composed in sympathy with the Pauline doctrine, 
 but under the influence of the Alexandrine philosophy. 
 Possibly they form the transition from the earlier to the 
 later conceptions of the person of Jesus. Indeed, the state- 
 ment in the proem of the Fourth Gospel, though more suc- 
 cinct and scientific in form, is not more decided than what 
 we find in Hebrews and Colossians. 
 
 There is no lack of unity in this portrait of Jesus. There 
 are no inconsistencies and discrepancies in the utterances of 
 Jesus respecting himself or in the introduction to the Fourth 
 Gospel, if we look on the evangelical logos as substan- 
 tially identical with that of Philo, the divine reason and 
 word, the divine manifestation of God, one with man and 
 one with God, Maker and Lord of all things, yet always 
 under the control of the only one God, the Son having 
 the glory of the only begotten of the Father, the one source
 
 120 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 
 
 of life and salvation, the one power able to regenerate the 
 world. 
 
 In contrast with these representations, the picture of the 
 Word of God in the New Testament Apocalypse (xix. 13-16) 
 follows the Jewish Old Testament conception. The Word, 
 who is King of Kings and Lord of Lords, smites the nations 
 with the sharp sword which proceeds out of his mouth, 
 rules them with a rod of iron (Ps. ii. 9), and treads the 
 wine-press of the fierceness of the wrath of Almighty God 
 (Isa. Ixiii. 3). This may be called the purely Jewish-Chris- 
 tian conception. 
 
 Paul's view was determined by his intense and lofty 
 moral-spiritual earnestness, which led him to construe the 
 glorified Messiah as the saviour from sin, the creator of 
 righteousness, and the reconciler of God and humanity. We 
 have no need to call in the Alexandrian philosophy in order 
 to understand his position. The case is different with the 
 other New Testament writings cited above, in which so many 
 of the expressions are identical with those of systems based 
 on Greek thought. 
 
 We conclude from this survey that there are in the New 
 Testament two distinct lines of advance in the construction 
 of the person of Jesus, the one Pauline, the other Alex- 
 andrian. The first was soteriological, the second philosophi- 
 cal ; the first magnified the person of the Messiah so as to 
 bring it into harmony with the great function assigned him, 
 a function the conception of which Paul seems to have 
 reached by spiritualizing the Old Testament view of salva- 
 tion ; the second identified Jesus, the Messiah, with the 
 grand mediatorial figure which, first presented by the Stoics, 
 was elaborated in Alexandria, and perhaps elsewhere, in 
 accordance with Jewish monotheism. The blending of these 
 two lines of thought is visible in Hebrews, Ephesians, Colos- 
 sians, and the Fourth Gospel, in which we have the culmina-
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 121 
 
 tion of the effort made by the early Christian thought to 
 idealize the person of the Messiah in the loftiest spiritual 
 way. Yet, as we have seen, the New Testament, with all 
 the grandeur of character and function that it ascribes to the 
 Christ, maintains the unique supremacy of the one God. 
 The demand for a mediating power between God and human- 
 ity is pushed to the farthest point which thought can occupy 
 consistently with the maintenance of the absoluteness of the 
 one Supreme Deity. 
 
 5. In connection with the development of the theistic 
 idea, we must consider the conception of the relation of God's 
 self-manifestation to the laws of the natural world. In the 
 early times of Israelitism, as in all primitive systems of re- 
 ligion, there was no sharply marked distinction between the 
 natural and the supernatural. The scientific idea of the orderly 
 constitution of nature according to law did not exist, or at 
 least had not been so formulated as to exercise a controlling 
 influence over human thought ; it was easy and natural to 
 regard the deity as interposing at will in the affairs of life. 
 We may distinguish two stadia in the conception of divine 
 intervention. There was the primitive, naive feeling that 
 the deity was everywhere, showing himself in all occurrences 
 of life, but especially recognizable in great calamities and 
 blessings and other stupendous events. Survivals of this 
 feeling in the Old Testament may be seen in the familiar 
 intercourse between God and the patriarchs in Genesis, and 
 in such occurrences as the appearance of the angels to Gideon 
 and Manoah (Judg. vi. 11 ; xiii.). The second stage belongs 
 to the more highly developed theocratic feeling, according to 
 which the whole life of Israel was under the direct and con- 
 stant supervision and guidance of its God; and all things, 
 great and small, simple and involved, were his doing. Whether 
 it were the appointment of a king, or the overthrow of an 
 enemy, a message of encouragement or reproof through the
 
 122 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 
 
 mouth of a prophet, or the revelation of a law of worship and 
 conduct, the bestowal of bounteous crops, or the infliction of 
 pestilence or famine, the decision of a lot between two men, 
 the overthrow of a nation or its restoration to its own land, 
 all was the immediate work of Yah we, God of Israel. 
 From this point of view there was no great distinction be- 
 tween ordinary and extraordinary divine action ; the latter 
 only served to call man's attention more sharply to the 
 divine presence. 1 The Old Testament writings abound in 
 angelic appearances, prophetic messages, and other indica- 
 tions of the constant readiness of Yahwe to take part in the 
 affairs of his people. 
 
 At the same time there are indications of another popular 
 view which looked on life simply as a sequence of events, the 
 natural progression of which it described without feeling 
 called on to recognize in it a divine element. The stories of 
 Micah and Samson in the book of Judges, much of the his- 
 tory of David in Samuel, and of the annals of the monarchy 
 in Kings, are mere records of natural occurrences from the 
 human point of view ; and in the story of Esther, in the form 
 in which it occurs in the Hebrew Scriptures, the divine 
 agency is completely lost sight of. This non-religious con- 
 ception of life was as natural to the Israelites as it is to our 
 own times, when even persons distinctly or fervidly religious 
 describe social or political occurrences without ever thinking 
 of introducing divine agency ; the belief in God exists, but 
 the attention is absorbed by the events described. 
 
 The tendency of social growth is to favor this non-religious 
 mode of conceiving history ; the presence of law and order 
 is more and more recognized, and it is felt more and more 
 strongly that recognition of and obedience to this order in 
 human life is a prime condition of success. The conviction 
 
 1 Cf. the modern popular distinction between general and particular 
 providence.
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 123 
 
 of divine supremacy remains ; but the impression of the 
 natural order of things becomes more and more powerful. 
 Men learn to depend on themselves ; and self-reliance is har- 
 monized with dependence on God by the belief that he mani- 
 fests himself in accordance with natural law. There is 
 perhaps a hint of this feeling in the story told in Isa. vii. 
 10-12, where Ahaz, engaged in preparing the defences of 
 Jerusalem, declines to ask a sign from Yahwe ; the ground 
 he assigns for his refusal is that he does not wish to tempt 
 the God of Israel, but his real reason perhaps was that he 
 relied more on fortifications than on divine signs. Whether 
 this was the case with Ahaz or not, we find in certain late 
 post-exilian books, as Ezra and Nehemiah, a very decided 
 non-miraculous view of life. Toward the close of the exile, 
 the return to Canaan had been painted in glowing colors by 
 the second Isaiah ; Yahwe, said the prophet, would prepare 
 the way for his people, bring them with joy and gladness to 
 their land, and there establish them in never-ending blessed- 
 ness as the centre and head of all the nations. The actual 
 event formed a bitter contrast to the brilliant anticipations 
 of the prophet. All the energies of the little community of 
 returned exiles were devoted to wringing a bare subsistence 
 out of the soil, and painfully building a temple greatly in- 
 ferior to that of Solomon. Life dragged on slowly till Ezra 
 and Nehemiah came, and gave a new impulse by restoring 
 the fortifications of the city and introducing the elaborate 
 ritual law which had been developed in Babylonia. Still, the 
 hard reality of the situation forced itself on the consciousness 
 of the people ; the Persian empire embraced all the territory 
 of the earth known or accessible to the Jews, and its over- 
 whelming -power made independence for the smaller nations 
 impossible. Nehemiah felt himself to be simply a Persian 
 governor, and trusted for success to the arts of a skilful 
 politician ; he and Ezra lived in the consciousness of God's
 
 124 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 
 
 presence, but they looked for no physical aid from that 
 source. At least, iii the books which bear their names, 
 which a century and a half later narrated the history of 
 their mission, there is no trace of supernatural interven- 
 tion, nothing but a purely human course of events. 
 
 The same characteristic is found in the remaining histori- 
 cal literature down to the beginning of our era, which records 
 contemporary events. It is otherwise with Chronicles, the 
 Apocalyptic books and 2 Maccabees ; 1 but Chronicles deals 
 with a remote, transfigured past, the Apocalypses with an 
 ideal, glorified future, and 2 Maccabees was written long 
 enough after the events it describes for a halo of embellish- 
 ment to gather about the history. 
 
 In the first century of Christianity we coine again on a 
 period of miracle. We have not, it is true, contemporary 
 accounts of the lives of Jesus and his disciples ; the Gospels 
 and Acts were composed a generation or two after the events 
 with which they are concerned, and tradition would naturally 
 increase the mass of supernatural material. But the tradi- 
 tion testifies to the existence of the belief in miracle ; and 
 we can hardly avoid the conclusion that it had a basis in 
 fact ; that is, that the apostles and other prominent disciples 
 did claim to work miracles. Their miraculous activity was 
 not, as is true in a great part of the Old Testament, and a 
 great part of the Apocalyptic books, directed to national 
 ends ; it was individual in its aim. The apostles went about 
 doing good, and using their deeds of healing as the occasion 
 of announcing the principles of the new kingdom of God. 
 For a parallel to this in the Old Testament we must look 
 to the quiet, beneficent activity of Elisha. The New Testa- 
 ment miracles are, however, not simply individual or physi- 
 cally beneficent in their aim ; they look also to shutting the 
 mouths of opponents, and demonstrating the divine origin 
 
 ' 1 iii. 24 ; v. 2, 3 ; x. 29, 30 ; xv. 12-16.
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 125 
 
 of the new religion. The Messianic kingdom of God has 
 taken the place of the old national Israel. 1 
 
 The ground of this outburst of miracle in the New Testa- 
 ment times must be sought first in the belief that the Mes- 
 sianic age, as the final era of prosperity for Israel, would be 
 ushered in and maintained by the direct intervention of di- 
 vine power. So soon as it was believed that Jesus was the 
 Messiah, the memory of the disciples, dwelling fondly on 
 the history of his blessed life, would naturally fill it up with 
 these special signs of the divine presence ; and in the same 
 way a later generation would clothe the grand figures of the 
 apostles with supernatural glory. This feeling continued to 
 exist in the Church for many centuries ; every great saint 
 was credited with miraculous power, and this in a perfectly 
 simple and sincere way. The legends of the saints were not 
 invented, but grew up out of the conviction that to such 
 eminent servants of God must be vouchsafed the impartation 
 of special power from on high. It is in the historical books 
 of the New Testament that the miraculous element is most 
 prominent. There is a difference in the portraiture of super- 
 natural activity between the three first Gospels and the 
 Fourth : in the former, the work of Jesus is one of simple 
 beneficence ; in the latter it is the outstreaming of his divine 
 nature and the manifestation of his glory (John ii. 11) ; in 
 this respect Acts resembles the Synoptics. The attitude of 
 the Epistles toward the supernatural is different. Paul 
 recognizes it almost exclusively in the fundamental facts 
 of Christianity, the resurrection and ascension of Jesus, the 
 
 1 Whether Jesus himself claimed to perform miracles, the data, as it seems 
 to me, do not enable us to decide. The Gospel accounts which ascribe mirac- 
 ulous powers to him may be explained as the product of reverent tradition. 
 His lofty spiritual simplicity is against rather than for the supposition that 
 he assumed such powers. On the other hand, it was the manner of the time 
 to believe in miracle, and he might have shared this belief without impairing 
 his ethical and spiritual purity.
 
 126 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 
 
 divine origin of the plan of salvation, and in his own special 
 call to the apostleship and instruction by the divine Spirit 
 in the principles of Christ. He dwells on his own experience, 
 his conversion (Gal. i. 11-24), and his visions and revelations 
 (2 Cor. xii. 1-4) ; but he does not claim the power of work- 
 ing physical miracles, 1 and describes his own work among 
 the churches in purely human terms, except that a general 
 divine guidance in his life is always presupposed. 
 
 It appears, therefore, that the New Testament view of mi- 
 raculous divine intervention in the affairs of men is substan- 
 tially the same with the second or theocratic stage of the Old 
 Testament representation. The Church has taken the place 
 of the nation, and God intervenes in a special way when the 
 interests of the Church require it. The primitive view which 
 saw the deity in every fact and act has passed away, a 
 natural sequence of events is recognized in ordinary occur- 
 rences ; but the life of the kingdom of God is not only to be 
 maintained by constant impartation of the divine Spirit, 
 it is to be guarded from attacks of enemies, human and super- 
 human, by supernatural intervention. The growing feeling 
 in favor of natural order is modified by the conviction that 
 the Church, as a special creation of God, is marked off from 
 the rest of the world, stands, indeed, in sharp contrast 
 with the world, and demands the special protection of 
 God. This conception (which maintained itself many cen- 
 turies) gave a natural color to miracles within the Church ; 
 it underlies the whole of the New Testament scheme of 
 thought. It was the subtraction of a definite segment of life 
 from the domain of natural law. The subsequent thought 
 of the Church has constantly tended (though with excep- 
 tions) to limit the agency of the supernatural to the New 
 Testament times. The feeling is that while the establish- 
 
 1 He mentions, however, the working of miracles as one of the charismata 
 (1 Cor. xii. 10).
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 127 
 
 ment of the Church was an event of such magnitude as to 
 demand the immediate intervention of God, its maintenance 
 is left to the working of natural or invisible-spiritual powers. 
 6. In this connection a word may be said as to the au- 
 thority accorded to the Scriptures from the time of Ezra to 
 the end of the first Christian century. The solemn descrip- 
 tion of the introduction of the Law in Neh. viii. indicates 
 that it was looked on as the divinely given guide of life. If 
 this narrative be supposed to be colored by the feeling of 
 a later time, it still appears from Chronicles that in the 
 latter part of the fourth century B. c., the Levitical Code 
 was recognized as an authoritative standard. In a work of 
 the second century (1 Mac. iii. 48), we find testimony as to 
 the estimation in which the Law was then held ; the canoni- 
 cal character of Jeremiah and therefore, as we may infer, of 
 all the prophets, is involved in Dan. ix. 2, and all three 
 canons are mentioned in the second prologue to Ecclesiasti- 
 cus. Numerous quotations from the Old Testament in the 
 later books show that its contents were familiar to the writers, 
 though nothing is said of a specifically divine authority, ex- 
 cept in relation to Moses and the Law (Ecclus. xlv. 17); see 
 Wisd. xvi.-xix., Ecclus. xliv.-xlix. (a list of Old Testament wor- 
 thies, but in chapter!., the non-biblical high-priest Simon, the 
 son of Onias, B. c. 219-199, is also mentioned), 1 Mac. iii. 
 18, 19 (cf. Ps. xxxiii. 16, 2 Chron. xiv. 11); iv. 9 ; 2 Mac. ii. 
 8 ; i. 20. The schools of law, which existed from the second 
 century down, are a proof of the peculiar position held by 
 the Pentateuch. That this reverence for the Scriptures ex- 
 isted in Egypt as well as in Palestine is shown by the Alex- 
 andrian-Greek translation, which was probably begun in the 
 early part of the third century, and finished about the end 
 of the second. There was no attempt at this time to define 
 the precise nature or extent of the authority of the Scripture ; 
 this subject was first touched on by Philo, who ascribed to
 
 128 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 
 
 the Old Testament writers an inward clearness of vision 
 bestowed by God, and held the prophets to be interpreters 
 of the divine will, Moses being at their head, the interpreter 
 of God in the highest sense (i. 511 ; ii. 163). Though he 
 regards all biblical books as in a peculiar sense authorita- 
 tive, he makes a marked distinction between the Law and 
 the others ; and it must be added that he claimed a sort of 
 inspiration for himself, he sometimes felt his soul suddenly 
 filled with ideas from above ; he was seized with enthusiasm, 
 and believed himself to be in direct communication with the 
 divine spirit (i. 441, 692). 
 
 This view of the inspiration and authority of the Old 
 Testament accords in general with the indications of the 
 New Testament and the Talmud, and may be accepted as the 
 prevailing Jewish opinion in the first century of Christianity. 
 There is no definition in the New Testament of the authority 
 of the inspired writings ; the most express statement respect- 
 ing their value is found in 2 Tim. iii. 16: "Every Scripture 
 which is inspired by God is also profitable for teaching, for 
 reproof, for correction, for righteous instruction, that the 
 man of God may be complete, fully equipped for every good 
 work." They are abundantly cited in proof, or illustration, 
 or as prediction of facts and doctrines, generally without 
 mention of author or place, with the formulas, " as it is writ- 
 ten," " which was spoken by the Lord through the prophet," 
 " the Scripture says," sometimes " he says to Moses," " Isaiah 
 cries," " David says," " one has somewhere testified," " the 
 Holy Ghost says," sometimes without introductory formula. 
 But we also find citations or insertions from other than Old 
 Testament books ; as, for example, from the book of Enoch 
 in Jude and Eevelation, and possibly from 2 Mac. vii. in 
 Heb. xi. 35 ; and even late Jewish traditions are introduced 
 in the same way as biblical citations : Paul speaks of the 
 rock which followed Israel through the wilderness to supply
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 129 
 
 them with water (I Cor. x. 4), Acts (vi. 22) represents Moses 
 as instructed in Egyptian wisdom, and 2 Tim. iii. 8, gives the 
 names of the Egyptian magicians who withstood Moses. It 
 is evident from these examples that no such sharp discrimi- 
 natign between canonical and uncanonical books, and no 
 such detailed theory of inspiration existed in the first cen- 
 tury as were afterward elaborated in the Christian Church. 
 We must suppose a more fluctuating conception of inspired 
 writings. The Old Testament, in the form in which we now 
 have it (the Palestinian Canon), was looked on with peculiar 
 reverence as the fountain of divine truth ; but all the books 
 of the Greek Canon were also held in high estimation, and 
 still other books, which never became canonical, were re- 
 garded not only as historically trustworthy, but as valid 
 religious guides. It is probable, as is said above, that a 
 peculiar pre-eminence was assigned to the writings ascribed 
 to Moses ; but beyond this, we have little to guide us in 
 determining the reigning opinion respecting the degrees of 
 authority of inspired works. 
 
 When we turn to the Scriptures themselves, we do not 
 find in the later books of the Old Testament a specific claim 
 to be regarded as infallible religious standards and guides. 
 The Law purports to be a direct verbal revelation from God, 
 and the prophets affirm that they speak what is put into 
 their mouths by the divine spirit ; but the books of the Third 
 Canon are conceived in purely human style, as the utterances 
 of historians, sages, and poets who chronicle facts and ex- 
 press their reflections and emotions purely out of the natural 
 impulse of authorship. There is no consciousness in Chron- 
 icles, Ecclesiastes, Proverbs, Psalms, of the right to be re- 
 garded as standards of faith, no expectation of being received 
 into a third division of inspired Scriptures. 
 
 The New Testament writers in like manner (with the 
 exception of the Apocalyptist) lay no claim directly to
 
 130 THE DOCTKINE OF GOD. 
 
 divine inspiration. In the First and Second Gospels, the 
 writers say nothing of their mode of composition ; the au- 
 thor of the Third Gospel describes his procedure as that of 
 the ordinary historian (Luke i. 1-4, and cf. Acts i. 1) ; the 
 passage at the end of the Fourth Gospel (John xxi. 24), which 
 speaks of the writer and his composition, says nothing of di- 
 vine guidance. Paul affirms that he received directly through 
 revelation of Jesus Christ the gospel which he preached 
 (Gal. i. 12 ; 1 Cor. i. 23) ; but he does not claim supernatural 
 guidance in the penning of his epistles, and as a rule relies 
 for his effect on the appeal to the Old Testament, or to the 
 religious consciousness or the common-sense of his readers. 
 In one passage (1 Cor. vii. 25) he declares that on a mooted 
 point he gives his judgment as one who has obtained mercy 
 of the Lord to be faithful ; that is, as a pious man using his 
 common-sense in a question pertaining to the conduct of 
 life. In none of the other epistles is -there indication of con- 
 sciousness that the writer is under divine direction, except 
 that he believes himself to be expounding the truth as it 
 was revealed through Jesus Christ. All, conscious of the 
 possession of truth, write out of the fulness of the heart, as 
 men write to friends, to counsel or comfort them. In what 
 concerns the fundamental principles of the gospel they ad- 
 mit no deviations from their teaching, but on other points they 
 ask only for the respect due to persons of age and experience. 
 They speak as witnesses to a divine historical fact, rather 
 than as formulators of a dogma. The consideration accorded 
 to their words was sometimes dependent on local circum- 
 stances. A strong party in Corinth showed antagonism to 
 Paul, admiring his letters as weighty, but declining to obey his 
 commands and suggestions (2 Cor. x. 10, 11 ; xi. 12 ; xii. 20, 21 ; 
 xiii. 2, 3). The Apocalypse is in the form of vision, a direct reve- 
 lation, as is the case with all apocalypses ; and it is precisely 
 in these books that the elaborate literary form makes the hy-
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 131 
 
 pothesis of vision, except in a very general sense, impossible. 
 It is deaf that Ezekiel, Zechariah, Daniel, the Sibyl, Enoch, 
 and the author or authors of the New Testament Apocalypse 
 worked up their material with the greatest care, for the pur- 
 pose of enforcing a duty or a doctrine, or guiding and inspir- 
 ing their people in times of doubt and suffering. The author 
 or final editor of the Apocalypse appends to his book an im- 
 precation on the man who shall add to or take from its con- 
 tents, from which we may infer that he wished them to be 
 regarded as divinely imparted and authoritative ; this is 
 perhaps a feeling peculiar to the last Christian redactor of 
 the work. Christianity was in process of organization. The 
 first century felt the throb of a great, uplifting religious idea ; 
 the apostles and other church-leaders were conscious (more 
 deeply and persistently than Philo) of the impulse of a divine 
 inspiration, which they believed was to change the current 
 of the world's religious life. But as yet the line of inspira- 
 tion was not sharply drawn ; there were many teachers, and 
 they were not always at one among themselves; their au- 
 thority depended largely on their personal influence ; there 
 was no collection of Christian sacred books. It was reserved 
 for later generations to sift the material, gradually to make 
 a canonical collection of Christian writings, and to invest 
 it with absolute authority in matters of faith and conduct. 
 
 As to the attitude of the New Testament writers to- 
 ward the Old Testament, it has already been remarked 
 that they accept it in general as authoritative, without 
 distinct definition of the character and extent of its 
 inspiration. As Jews they had been trained from in- 
 fancy to regard it as the word given from God to Israel, 
 handed down from the fathers through the generations. 
 There was no reason why a Jew should question the valid- 
 ity of this transmission. There was no critical discus- 
 sion. The Talmud decides on date and authorship of Old
 
 132 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 
 
 Testament books in the most mechanical way. Moses was 
 held to have written the Pentateuch and Job, and Joshua the 
 book that bears his name ; Judges, Samuel, and Euth were 
 ascribed to Samuel, and Kings to Jeremiah ; Chronicles, Ezra, 
 and Nehemiah were referred to Ezra, and Esther to the Great 
 Synagogue ; the prophets and Daniel were held to have been 
 written by the men whose names they bear ; Solomon was 
 regarded as the author of Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, and the 
 Song of Songs ; in the Psalter, the titles of the psalms were 
 regarded as authoritative, and certain untitled psalms were 
 provided with authors, none of whom were later than David. 1 
 The critical-historical method of investigation did not exist. 
 It would no more have occurred to a Jew of that time to 
 doubt the Mosaic authorship of the Pentateuch than to call 
 in question the generally accepted opinion that the sun 
 moved around the earth. We have no reason to suppose 
 that the Jews of the first century of our era knew any 
 better than we why any particular psalm, as the 68th or the 
 110th, was ascribed to David ; they knew only that it so stood 
 in the titles. It probably occurred to no one that the book 
 of Isaiah was a collection of writings by different men. 
 There was little or no curiosity on such points, and so far 
 as it existed, it was easily satisfied by such simple solutions 
 as we find in the Talmud. The New Testament shares the 
 traditional opinion of the time on these points. 
 
 If we go back some time to the period when the Old 
 Testament books were edited and collected, it is not impos- 
 sible to understand the methods by which they were assigned 
 to certain authors. It is tolerably clear how Moses came to 
 be regarded as the composer of the Pentateuch ; he was the 
 
 1 See L. Wogue, " Histoire de la Bible," Paris, 1881, pp. 15 ff. The psalm- 
 authors besides David (who is held to have written the greater part of the 
 Psalter) are stated to be: Adam, Melkisedek, Abraham, Moses, Heman, 
 Jeduthun, Asaph, and the three sons of Korah.
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 133 
 
 heroic figure of the formative period of the nation, and the 
 natural traditional author of its legislation and primitive 
 history. 1 But, it may be asked, supposing the ritual to have 
 grown up after the exile, how could the men who developed 
 it ascribe it to Moses ? The answer is, first, that in an un- 
 critical age a generation or two of use would suffice to create 
 the opinion that a usage had existed from time imme- 
 morial; and further, when a book had been written, the 
 scribes of that day felt no hesitation in making additions 
 to it, they were innocent of suspicion that they were en- 
 croaching on the integrity of the book or the rights of the 
 author, and their additions were accepted without question 
 by an uncritical public as parts of the original work. In 
 this way, from a small body of tradition, believed to go back 
 to Moses, might arise in process of time a great mass of law ; 
 and there is no need to suppose deliberate deception, it was 
 a process of traditional expansion, in which the successive 
 accretions might not unnaturally be regarded as belonging 
 to the original legislation. 2 We can also see how the titles 
 of the prophetic books arose. The prophets lived in com- 
 paratively late times, after the beginning of the literary 
 period; manuscripts of their writings and traditions of au- 
 thors' names might be handed down from the regal period 
 and the exile to the fourth or third century ; to such a tra- 
 dition a certain historical value has to be allowed, we may 
 feel tolerably sure that we have writings of Amos, Hosea, 
 Isaiah, and the other prophets, down to Malachi, Joel, and 
 the second Zechariah. It does not follow that we have all 
 
 1 Compare above, pp. 70, 71. 
 
 2 Ezekiel, it is true, says nothing of Moses (Ezek. xl.-xlviii.), but derives 
 his legislation from an immediate divine revelation. But the orderly devel- 
 opment of the Deuteronomic code may have gone on during and after the 
 exile in the way above described ; and it is to be noted that Ezekiel's scheme 
 is not incorporated into the Pentateuch. The possibility of deliberate decep- 
 tion in the unknown framers of the Levitical Code may be admitted, but it 
 does not seem to be necessary.
 
 134 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 
 
 of their writings, or that all the material that we have "be- 
 longs to the men whose names are attached to the books. 
 The freedom which the scribes of those days allowed them- 
 selves was great. The preciousness of parchment led to the 
 custom of writing the compositions of different authors on 
 the same roll ; the best example of this composite character 
 of a manuscript is found in our book of Isaiah, which, start- 
 ing with the discourses of the prophet of Hezekiah's time, 
 has appropriated material from the seventh century, the 
 exile, and the early post-exilian time ; handed down through 
 the generations, it was accepted as wholly the work of the 
 son of Amos. The same sort of growth is visible in our 
 books of Micah and Zechariah. The book of Jonah, a late 
 religious apologue, was placed among the prophetic writ- 
 ings because it bore the name of a prophetic man, said in 
 the book of Kings (2 Kings xiv. 25) to have lived in the 
 days of Jeroboam the Second (toward the middle of tlie 
 eighth century B.C.); the author made the ancient seer 
 the hero of his work, possibly on the basis of a tradition 
 (for in Jeroboam's time the Assyrians and the Israelites had 
 known each other for a century), but chiefly to give dignity 
 and authority to his religious lesson, and probably uncon- 
 scious of literary and historical sin in ascribing to this old 
 prophet the ideas of a much later time. The historical books 
 of the Second Canon Joshua, Judges, Samuel, Kings 
 bear no authors' names ; they were gradually compiled from 
 traditions and written documents, and received their final 
 shape from editors (during the exile and later) who did not 
 feel their share in the work to be of sufficient importance to 
 call for the mention of their names. It does not appear that 
 the pre-Christian Jews felt it necessary to know the authors 
 by name ; the later rabbis, with greater literary and religious 
 but quite uncritical curiosity, sought the authors of these 
 books in prominent men who were supposed to be contem-
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 135 
 
 poraneous with the last events described in them. Of the 
 books of the Third Canon, Job, Lamentations, Daniel, Esther, 
 Chronicles, Ezra, Neheiniah, are anonymous. Job, from its 
 appearance of antiquity, was naturally referred to Moses. 
 Chronicles, Ezra, and Nehemiah were with equal naturalness 
 assigned to the eminent man who played so prominent a part 
 in the establishment of the law. To the Great Synagogue 1 
 or to Mordecai was given the book of Esther, while Euth, by 
 its subject-matter, went with the earlier historical works. 
 The Lamentations over the fall of Jerusalem suggested the 
 sad prophet, Jeremiah ; and no other than Daniel could be 
 thought of as the writer of the book which bears his name. 
 As early as the exile, perhaps earlier, the tradition had made 
 Solomon the ideal of intellectual greatness, not the religious 
 wisdom of the later conception, but knowledge of men and 
 things (1 Kings iv. 29-34, Heb. v. 9-14). There existed col- 
 lections of apothegms ascribed to him (Prov. xxv. 1) ; these 
 were gradually added to down to a late period, and the whole 
 of the resulting book of Proverbs was looked on as his work. 
 It was natural also for the author of Ecclesiastes to select 
 the wise king as the expounder of his philosophy of life; it 
 is less clear how his name came to be attached to the Song 
 of Songs unless it be merely from the statement in 1 Kings 
 v. 32, that his songs were a thousand and five ; in both these 
 cases the writer's ascription of his own production to the 
 ancient king was made possible by the unscientific feeling 
 of the times to which reference has already been made. The 
 designation of the writers of the psalms was determined by 
 similar considerations. The tradition pointed to David as 
 
 1 The Great Synagogue, that National Academy of the Tora which Jewish 
 tradition created for the time of Ezra, is not mentioned in any work earlier 
 than the Talmud, is foreign to the spirit of the fifth century B. c., and must 
 be regarded as an attempt of later Jewish thought to bestow a consecrating 
 antiquity on that official interpretation of the Law which was believed to be 
 the breath of the national life.
 
 136 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 
 
 the writer of religious odes ; in the eighth century he was 
 thought of as the inventor of instruments of music (Amos 
 vi. 5), and he was speedily idealized into the sweet singer 
 of Israel. From time to time collections of hymns were 
 formed bearing his name ; an allusion was found to some 
 fact in his history, or, as in the case of Ecclesiastes, a writer 
 would seek to give dignity to his production by ascribing it 
 to the ancient and famous king. Other psalms, composed by 
 Levitical singers, were referred, probably on the basis of a 
 good tradition, to a late organization known as the sons 
 of Korah, or, without authority, to supposed ancestors of 
 similar organizations, as Asaph, Heman, and Ethan ; the 
 majestic ninetieth psalm was ascribed to the revered law- 
 giver, of whose wisdom it was doubtless felt to be a worthy 
 monument. These were doubtless the opinions as to date 
 and authorship of Old Testament books held by Jews and 
 Christians in the first century of our era. 
 
 The use made of the Old Testament Scriptures by the New 
 Testament writers is such as might be anticipated from the 
 state of opinion just described. On the one hand, the na- 
 tional sacred writings are treated as authoritative; on the 
 other hand, on account of the absence of historical-exegetical 
 feeling, the greatest liberty was assumed in the interpretation 
 and application of Scriptural passages. Small regard was 
 paid to context. Words were made to mean anything which 
 they might suggest. Quotations were taken, not from the 
 Hebrew, but from the Septuagint, or from a current Aramaic 
 version ; the Hebrew language had long since ceased to be 
 the spoken tongue of the nation, and had been replaced in 
 Palestine by Aramaic, in Egypt by Greek, and elsewhere by 
 Greek or Latin. The feeling which we find afterward so 
 definite in the Talmud, that the separate words of Scripture 
 had an independent, objective force, was already in existence. 
 The Epistle to the Hebrews, for example (ii. 13), illustrates
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 137 
 
 the oneness of Jesus and his people from Isa. viii. 18, taking 
 a clause out of its connection (herein following the punctua- 
 tion of the Greek), and entirely changing the sense of the 
 original. The prophet had said : " Behold, I and the chil- 
 dren whom Yah we has given me [who had symbolical names 
 pointing to the fortunes of the nation] are for signs and for 
 wonders in Israel ; " the epistle quotes : " Behold, I and the 
 children whom God has given me," and makes the Messiah 
 the speaker, and the " children " those who believe on him. 
 The central motive of the New Testament quotations is the 
 kingdom of God set up by Jesus Christ, the good news of 
 salvation to the world. This grand and inspiring idea filled 
 and controlled the Christian consciousness of that day. In 
 the fulness of time, it was held, God had visited his people 
 and performed the promises made to the fathers. It could 
 not but be that the prophets, the Psalmist, and Moses in the 
 Law had looked forward to and spoken of this wondrous 
 event. For most Jews of that time there was no literature 
 but the Old Testament, and it was more than a body of an- 
 cient literature, for them it comprehended all truth. The 
 Talmud finds in it everywhere allusions to the current events 
 of the Talmudic period. The Christian reader of the first 
 century, aglow with the inspiration of God's latest manifes- 
 tation of himself in the gospel, could not fail to find the 
 evangelical history, the history of the kingdom of heaven, 
 in the words of the ancient saints. The life of the Christ, 
 the doctrines of the new dispensation, the fortunes of the 
 Church, would stand out clearly to the Christian eye on the 
 pages of Scripture ; the old congregation of Israel was felt 
 to be a preparation for and a prediction of the new congre- 
 gation of Christ ; the chief interest for the Christian lay in 
 the discovery of references to the gospel times, and in a 
 thousand Old Testament passages he might find prophecies 
 and illustrations of what was going on around him. There
 
 138 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 
 
 is, however, a difference in different New Testament books 
 and persons in respect to simplicity and naturalness of citation. 
 The quotations made by Jesus himself are almost exclusively 
 of ethical or general religious import, and bear their validity 
 on their face. The same thing may be said of the Catholic 
 and the Pastoral epistles. The Apocalypse has few direct 
 citations, but a large mass of Old Testament material (to- 
 gether with much from Enoch) interwoven into its text in 
 a free manner. The predictions of the life of Christ given 
 by the evangelists themselves are also marked by uncritical 
 freedom, but are confined to passages whose wording natu- 
 rally suggests a prediction of the actual experiences of Jesus. 
 Paul's method of procedure betrays his rabbinical training ; 
 he not only gives to general Old Testament expressions the 
 technical senses of his own theology, but he allegorizes inci- 
 dents and words into meanings remote from their original 
 intention. Hagar and Sara he represents as signifying re- 
 spectively the old Israel held in the bondage of the covenant 
 of Sinai and the Church of Christ freed from the bondage of 
 the law. In his discussion of the glossolaly (1 Cor. xiv.), 
 wishing to prove the superiority of prophecy over the speak- 
 ing with tongues, he declares that the former benefits those 
 who believe, while the latter is serviceable to those only who 
 do not believe ; this he proves from Isa. xxviii. 11:" By 
 men of strange tongues, and by the lips of strangers will I 
 speak to this people," where all that the prophet says is that 
 God will teach the Israelites a lesson through the foreign 
 Assyrians. The height of arbitrary quotation is reached in 
 the Epistle to the Hebrews, in which the free Alexandrian 
 method of treating the Old Testament is visible. There are 
 no bounds to the writer's ability to extract from his Greek 
 version the sense which he desires ; he goes so far as to 
 find a demonstration of the necessity of the sacrifice of 
 Christ (Heb. x. 5-10) in a psalm-passage (Ps. xL 6-8) which
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 139 
 
 affirms that God desires not sacrifice, but obedience to his 
 will. 
 
 But while we are forced to admit an uncritical and arbi- 
 trary element in New Testament quotations from the Old 
 Testament, we must recognize the power of the new spirit 
 which created this sort of exposition. The circumstances of 
 the time being what they were, it was a necessity that the 
 spirituality of the religion of Jesus should stamp itself on 
 the Jewish Scriptures. The divine revelation to Israel was 
 a standard of faith for the Church of the first century, but 
 a new revelation had appeared in Christianity, and it was 
 essential that the two should be brought into harmony. For 
 that generation it was more important that a higher spiritual 
 feeling should be impressed on the Old Testament than that 
 its meaning should be investigated in a critical, historical 
 way. With us the case is different ; the ideas of Christianity 
 have embodied themselves in history, and we can look 
 quietly at the Old Testament religion as one step in the de- 
 velopment of Judaism. It was not so in the first century. 
 Christianity was engaged in a struggle for life, and one of its 
 most powerful weapons was the demonstration of its harmony 
 with the book which contained God's revelation to Israel in 
 the olden time. This was the instinctive feeling which 
 prompted the scriptural exegesis of the New Testament 
 writers. And it must not be forgotten that there is a basis 
 of exegetical truth in their procedure. The Old Testament 
 thought is controlled by a true spiritual feeling which found 
 fuller expression in the more developed ideas of Christianity. 
 From this point of view the mechanical predictive element 
 is of small importance. No OM Testament writer foresaw 
 the times of Christianity, though many a prophet and many 
 a psalmist had in his own soul the germs of the teaching of 
 Jesus. The early Christians were conscious of this substan- 
 tial identity between the two revelations. If they carried
 
 140 THE DOCTRINE OF GOD. 
 
 the correspondence of form too far, seeing circumstantial 
 agreements where none existed, this is what is to be expected. 
 Christianity, by adopting the Old Testament, established the 
 unity of the whole Jewish development, and thus initiated 
 a study of the Scriptures which was destined after varied 
 exegetical fortunes to lead to a separation between the essen- 
 tial and the unessential, and a recognition of the real spiritu- 
 ality of Old Testament and New Testament alike.
 
 CHAPTEE III. 
 
 SUBORDINATE SUPERNATURAL BEINGS. 
 
 WE have now to inquire into the Jewish doctrine of 
 supernatural intelligences inferior to the divine being. 
 Beginning with the Old Testament, we must then ask whether 
 the doctrine received accretions in the post-biblical period, 
 and in what form it is found in the New Testament. 
 
 1. It will suffice merely to mention the survivals from early 
 animistic beliefs which occur in the Old Testament, but do 
 not maintain themselves in the later religious development. 
 That oldest system of thought, according to which every 
 object of nature, animate or inanimate, was inhabited by 
 a spirit, seems to have vanished. We cannot, indeed, be 
 sure on this point, our existing Hebrew literature has 
 been carefully worked over by monotheistic writers, who 
 have probably omitted or transformed many of the lower 
 popular beliefs. Such beliefs, as we know from the history 
 of other peoples, often survive a long time even in the pres- 
 ence of higher culture. Yet, judging from the few hints 
 given in the Old Testament, it seems probable that the 
 Hebrews, as early as the fourteenth century B. c., had already 
 left behind them, or greatly modified, the old vague fetish- 
 ism of which traces appear only in a few objects of popular 
 worship. 1 Among these the teraphim may perhaps be in- 
 cluded, household protecting spirits, possibly a developed 
 
 1 On remains of totemism in the Hebrew folk-religion see J. G. Frazer, 
 " Totemism," Edinburgh, 1887 ; W. R. Smith, " The Religion of the Semites," 
 London and New York, 1889.
 
 142 SUBORDINATE SUPERNATURAL BEINGS. 
 
 survival of the primitive divine tree or stone or animal. 1 
 More definite instances of demons 2 are found in the sa'ir and 
 lilit of Tsa. xxxiv. 14; these creatures (called "satyr," or 
 " he goat," and " night-monster," in the Kevised English Ver- 
 sion) seem, like the Arabian jinn, to have been originally wild 
 animals, thought of as hostile to man. They were probably 
 Canaanitish objects of worship (Lev. xvii. 7) ; whether they 
 belonged to the original Hebrew system, or were adopted by 
 the Hebrews from their neighbors, it is hard to say. 3 
 
 Magic art, of which traces appear in the Old Testament, 
 was no doubt originally connected with demon-worship ; that 
 is to say, it issues out of that primitive stratum of thought 
 in which it was believed that man could coerce the extra- 
 human supernatural powers. This has proved itself to be 
 one of the most obstinate and persistent of man's primitive 
 beliefs ; it maintained its place down to the New Testa- 
 ment times (with ever-changing forms) ; it appears in the 
 Talmud, and exists to-day all over the world. It is founded 
 on a vague idea that the supernatural is somehow under the 
 control of law, and that unlimited power and happiness be- 
 long to him who can discover this law. It is a curious 
 example of the survival, in a period of high culture, of the 
 crude faith of primitive savagery. 4 
 
 1 General analogy would suggest a totemistic origin for the teraphim, 
 though in the Old Testament they have probably passed beyond the primitive 
 form and seem sometimes to have been human in shape (1 Sam. xix. 13) ; in 
 any case we must suppose that they represent the old family-cult. 
 
 2 The word " demon " is here used not in the later sense of " malignant 
 spirit," but in the signification (to which the etymology points) of a supernat- 
 ural being who has not been raised to the rank of a tribal or national god. 
 
 8 For the Babylonian demon lilit, cf. Lenormant, " La Magie chez les 
 Chaldeens," and for the use of the term in the Talmud, see Weber, " System 
 der pal. Theol.," p. 246. The term shedim is employed in the Old Testament 
 of foreign deities only (Deut. xxxii. 17, Ps. cxxxvi. 37) ; in Babylonian it sig- 
 nifies " bull-deity," and seems therefore not to express a class of demons. 
 
 4 Necromancy is a well-defined fact in the Old Testament, and was doubt- 
 less employed abundantly by the Hebrews (Isa. viii. 19). The demon of necro-
 
 SUBORDINATE SUPERNATURAL BEINGS. 143 
 
 The demon-figure of the Old Testament which is most 
 clearly defined, and which made the most serious effort to 
 maintain itself in the national thought is Azazel (Lev. xvi.). 
 In the solemn rite of the day of atonement he appears as a 
 wilderness-power to whom pertains the domain of evil ; the 
 world is, as it were, divided between Yahwe and Azazel. So 
 distinct is the personality and so great the power of the 
 demon that some have thought of identifying him with 
 Satan. But though the two personages are in some regards 
 identical, their historical developments are so different that 
 they must be treated as separate conceptions. Of the early 
 history of Azazel we know nothing; he makes an abrupt 
 appearance in a late post-exilian document and is never 
 mentioned elsewhere in the Old Testament ; he plays a great 
 role in the book of Enoch (viii. ix.), where he is the leader 
 of the evil spirits, and is condemned to imprisonment till 
 the day of judgment, when he is to be cast into the fire (x.). 
 Here certainly he seems to play the part of Satan ; yet in 
 the succeeding literature it is Satan that keeps the first place, 
 and Azazel practically vanishes. It is to be noted that in 
 Leviticus he is spoken of as a well-known person ; he is a 
 wilderness-demon, somehow connected with the goat. It 
 seems a natural inference that he was originally a satyr- like 
 or goat-like figure, a hostile desert-power to be placated by 
 an offering, and by some means singled out from the mass of 
 demons and elevated to a controlling position. The similarity 
 between his role and that of the Persian Ahriman is obvious ; 
 and it is not impossible that this isolation of Azazel was 
 due to an impulse derived from Persian thought. Satan and 
 
 mantic art is called ob (1 Sam. xxviii., Isa. xxix. 4, cf. Isa. viii. 19), a word of 
 uncertain origin. Of ancestor- worship there is no direct trace ; the teraphim, 
 as household deities, may point to such a cult through a fusion of totems and 
 human ancestors. The plural form of the word may refer to the mass of 
 tereph-objects in a family or clan. Jer. ii. 26, 27, deals with a late form 
 of idolatry.
 
 144 SUBORDINATE SUPERNATUEAL BEINGS 
 
 Azazel may be looked on as rivals ; of the contest between 
 them we do not know the details. It appears only that 
 victory fell to the former on probable general grounds which 
 will be pointed out below. That the Azazel-cult had no 
 little hold on the popular feeling is evident from the fact 
 that it was incorporated into the advanced Levitical ritual. 1 
 
 2. Alongside of these demon-forms we find a more ad- 
 vanced conception in the host of spirits who are represented 
 as forming Yahwe's heavenly court. The fullest and most 
 striking description of this court is given in the story of Ahab 
 and Micaiah (1 Kings xxii. 19-23) : " 1 saw Yahwe sitting on 
 his throne and . all the . host of heaven standing by him on 
 his right hand and on his left. And Yahwe said, Who will 
 entice Ahab that he may go up and fall at Eamoth-Gilead ? 
 And one said one thing, and another another, and there came 
 forward a spirit, 2 and stood before Yahwe and said, I will 
 entice him. And Yahwe said, How ? and he said, I will go 
 forth and will be a lying spirit in the mouth of all his 
 prophets. And he said, Thou shalt entice him, and also 
 thou shalt succeed ; go forth and do so." Here we have an 
 apparently homogeneous mass of spirits without distinction 
 of grade and authority; the whole body forms a sort of 
 council, whose advice on this important occasion is asked 
 by Yahwe. There is no question of right or wrong ; the 
 spirit of falsehood is the agent of Yahwe acting by his direc- 
 tion and assured of his support. The prophet Micaiah, wish- 
 ing to account for the predictions of Ahab's prophets, thinks 
 
 1 Azazel seems to be a Hebrew word, possibly connected with the stem 
 azaz, " strong ; " the significations " he from whom one withdraws," or " ho 
 who withdraws himself [from God] " (from azal) do not accord so well with 
 the probably primitive character of the demon-figure. But the origin of the 
 idea and the name is uncertain. 
 
 2 Literally, " the spirit ; " namely, the one who had just manifested himself 
 in Ahab's prophets, not the spirit of prophecy in general, but the inspirer of 
 this special prediction.
 
 SUBORDINATE SUPERNATURAL BEINGS. 145 
 
 it necessary to ascribe them to a direct influence from God. 
 Other examples are found in the evil spirit which, sent by 
 God, broke up the friendly relations between Abirnelech and 
 the Shechemites (Judg. ix. 23), and the evil spirit from 
 Yahwe (or from God), which disturbed the soul of Saul 
 (1 Sam. xvi. 14-23). 1 
 
 These spirits doubtless issue out of old animistic material. 
 The peculiarity of the conception is that the spirit-being is 
 completely isolated from the object to which it was attached 
 in primitive times. The sa'ir (and perhaps also Azazel) 
 seems to have been thought of as possessing an animal form, 
 as was probably the case in earliest times with most spirits. 
 It was, however, a primitive belief that the soul or spirit 
 could detach itself from the body in which it resided, and go 
 its independent way. We may suppose that the progress of 
 reflection gradually led men to isolate the spirit from its 
 bodily connections, and this is a great advance in the organ- 
 ization of the supernatural world. In the Old Testament, 
 further, the spirits appear as completely subordinated to the 
 supreme God, and this monotheistic constitution points to a 
 comparatively late period in religious development. 2 From 
 the non-appearance of this body of spirits in the prophetic 
 writings it may be inferred, indeed, that they belonged rather 
 to the popular than to the prophetical religious scheme ; still, 
 however this may be, and whatever may have been the 
 looser popular ideas on the subject, the actual spirit-system 
 of the Old Testament is cast in a monotheistic mould. 
 
 1 Cf . also Job iv. 1 5, where in a night-vision the announcement of a great 
 religious truth is ascribed to a " spirit," for so apparently we must render the 
 Hebrew, and not " wind," or " breath." 
 
 2 Yet here also we find traces of magic, in the exorcism, for example, of 
 Saul's evil spirit by David's music (1 Sam. xvi. 23), and in the musical invoca- 
 tion of Elisha's spirit of prophecy (2 Kings iii. 15). This survival of the old 
 idea seems not to have interfered with the practical supremacy of Yahwe. 
 At the present day there is found in the Christian world a similar combina- 
 tion of belief in God and reliance on magic. 
 
 10
 
 146 SUBORDINATE SUPERNATURAL BEINGS. 
 
 The subordination to the supreme God is complete, 
 there is no independence of action in the spirits. Nor is 
 there, so far as appears, any differentiation of moral character 
 among the members of the body. All dwell in the presence 
 of Yahwe, are his servants, carry out his commands whether 
 for good or for evil. If the epithet " evil " is applied to one 
 of them, it is rather from the nature of the work assigned 
 him than from his moral character. They thus represent 
 a stadium in religious development in which a substantially 
 unitary conception of the world has been reached, but the 
 demand for separation between good and evil moral super- 
 natural agencies has not yet shown itself. God is absolutely 
 all, the creator of light and darkness, peace and evil (Isa. 
 xlv. 7). There came a time when the Israelitish ethical 
 feeling was offended by the imputation of moral evil to God ; 
 but apparently down to and during the exile the best think- 
 ers of the nation were satisfied with the acknowledgment of 
 his supreme control of all things. The sharp struggle to es- 
 tablish the monotheistic idea left little time for this sort of 
 ethical elaboration of the theistic scheme. 
 
 3. Still another form of supernatural agency is found in 
 the angels. They stand alongside of the spirits, resembling 
 them in some respects, differing from them in others ; no 
 attempt is made in the Old Testament to define the relations 
 between the two classes, both are growths out of the old 
 folk-faith, with different starting-points and paths of develop- 
 ment. The angels of the older Hebrew literature (down to 
 the second century B. c.) are like the spirits in having no 
 functional or ethical differentiation among themselves ; they 
 are all ministers and messengers of God, executing his designs, 
 benevolent or harmful, saving or destroying without respect 
 to circumstance. They differ from the spirits in the nature 
 of the commissions intrusted to them, appearing often in 
 bodily shape, and performing bodily actions, such as deliver-
 
 SUBORDINATE SUPERNATURAL BEINGS. 147 
 
 ing messages to persons and inflicting plagues, while the 
 spirits act directly on the minds of men. 
 
 The ground of this difference between the two categories of 
 being is to be sought in their origins. Both doubtless go 
 back to the spiritual essences which were believed to reside 
 in objects ; but the Old Testament spirits seem to be merely 
 the isolation of these essences, while the angels appear to be 
 derived immediately from forms of old deities. For between 
 angels and " sons of God " or " sons of the Elohim " in the 
 Old Testament there does not seem to be any difference of 
 nature. These last occur by name on three occasions : they 
 intermarry with human beings and become the fathers of old 
 heroes (Gen. vi. 2) ; they form a heavenly court, and report 
 their procedures to Yahwe (Job i. ii.) ; they are present at 
 the creation of the world (Job xxxviii. 7). It is they also with 
 whom God takes counsel respecting the creation of man, and 
 in whose image man is created (Gen. i. 26) ; they are con- 
 sulted by Yahwe as to the coercion of the tower-builders 
 (Gen. xi. 7) ; they are the Elohim-beings with whom man 
 is compared by the Psalmist (Ps. viii. 5) ; with two of them 
 (afterward called " angels " ) Yahwe descends to earth to in- 
 quire into the alleged iniquities of Sodom (Gen. xviii. 19). 1 
 They carry us back to a theistic scheme in which Yahwe 
 was only the first among a host of equals. In time the rest 
 were subordinated to him, becoming in part the inferior 
 deities of other nations, in part the ministers and messengers 
 
 1 In bhe form of heathen deities, Elohim-beings to whom the nations have 
 been assigned (Dent, xxxii. 8 in the Greek), they appear in Ps. Ixxxii. (v. 1 : 
 " Yahwe judges in the midst of gods " [elohim] ; v. 6 : "I have said, ye are gods, 
 and all of you sons of Elyon " [the most High] ), Ps. xxix. 1 (where the " sons 
 of gods," elim, are called on to give honor to Yahwe), Ps. Ixxxix. 7 ("sons of 
 gods," elim), Ps. xcvii. 7 (" Do homage to him, all gods," elohim), and perhaps 
 Ps. Iviii. 1 (2), by a slight change of text : " Do ye indeed utter justice, O 
 gods 7 " This conception of heathen gods, which is inconsistent with mono- 
 theism, seems to have maintained itself after the exile, but does not impair 
 the practical supremacy of the God of Israel.
 
 148 SUBORDINATE SUPERNATURAL BEINGS. 
 
 of Yah we. It is in this latter character that they are termed 
 " angels " in the Old Testament ; the expression " sons of the 
 Elohini " (that is, memhers of the Elohim-class) or " sons of 
 God " designates them in the Hebrew theology rather as the 
 attendants of the supreme deity, while the angels are active 
 agents, and intermediaries between God and the world. 
 Their creation is nowhere mentioned ; their existence from 
 the beginning is assumed. 
 
 The oldest angelic representation in the Old Testament 
 seems to be that of a being who is apparently charged with 
 the whole divine authority, and acts as if he were an inde- 
 pendent divinity (the angel of the Lord or of God). Such is 
 the tone of the being who appears to Hagar (Gen. xvi. 7-13), 
 to Joshua (Josh. v. 13), and to Manoah (Judg. xiii. 18). This 
 figure is perhaps a real survival of an ancient deity ; it is thus 
 that an independent deity, transformed in a monotheistic 
 faith into a messenger of the supreme God, would act; and 
 it is to be observed that the title " angel " distinctly and 
 completely differences .such a being from God himself, 
 Yahwe could never be called his own messenger. In this way, 
 also, we are to understand the vision in Zech. iii., where the 
 titles " the angel of Yahwe " and " Yahwe " are interchanged ; 
 the divine authority resides in the angel, but he is not identi- 
 cal with the divine being. Closely allied with this angelic 
 form are the angels of the face or presence (Isa. Ixiii. 9, cf. Ex. 
 xxxiii. 15) and of the name (Ex. xxiii. 21), who represent the 
 divine power in a very special way. From these passages it 
 may be concluded that this conception of special angelic 
 intermediaries retained its hold on Jewish thought down to a 
 comparatively late period ; it appears in an altered form in 
 the book of Daniel. It arose from the demand for an actual 
 divine presence among men, coupled with the feeling that 
 God could not appear in person. 
 
 This representation of the intercourse between man and
 
 SUBORDINATE SUPERNATURAL BEINGS. 149 
 
 God was, however, gradually modified by the monotheistic 
 feeling. The increasing exaltation of the divine being tended 
 to reduce all subordinate supernatural intelligences to the 
 same level ; more and more he was withdrawn into absolute 
 aloneness, and all his ministers were as one in his sight. 
 Some time before the exile the angel appears as a simple 
 messenger and agent of God ; so we may probably understand 
 the horses and chariots which surrounded Elisha (2 Kings 
 vi 17), and such is the character of the being who acts as 
 interpreter to the prophet Zechariah (Zech. i. 9). This is 
 the view which became more and more prominent in the 
 post-biblical Judaism, and passed into the New Testament ; 
 it is found in Daniel, Tobit, and Enoch, and in the Talmud. 1 
 
 At this point we have to notice an extraordinary develop- 
 ment of the scheme of the angelic world which appears in 
 the Jewish literature a couple of hundred years before the 
 beginning of our era. In- the body of the Old Testament no 
 one of the angels receives a special proper name, nor is there 
 any definite gradation among them. In the books of Tobit, 
 Daniel, and Enoch, we are suddenly introduced to a well- 
 organized angelic society, the individuals of which have their 
 
 1 Weber, " System der pal. Theol ," 34, 35, and Kohut, " Jiidische Angel- 
 ologie und Damonologie." Angelic appearances are rare in the later historical 
 books ; doubtless the apparition which struck down Heliodorus (2 Mac. iii. 24 
 ff.) was thought of as an angel. In the Old Testament writings down to the 
 end of the exile, angels occur almost exclusively in folk-stories. About one 
 fourth of the occurrences are found in the narrative books of the Pentateuch : 
 (15 in Gen., 6 in Ex., 11 in Numb., of which 10 are in the Balaam-story) ; 
 Judges has nearly one fifth (22, the story of Manoah, ch. xiii., containing 10) ; 
 Samuel and Kings show a somewhat smaller number (14), and Chronicles 
 nearly as many (10); the prophets are almost silent (1 in Hosea, and 1 in 
 Isaiah). The angel in pre-exilian times thus seems to belong to the popular 
 rather than to the prophetic religion. Immediately after the exile the 
 angelic figure becomes very prominent in Zechariah (20 occurrences), but 
 differs from the earlier form somewhat, in being more intimate and confiden- 
 tial with the prophet. Later in Job (twice) and in Psalms (8 times) the 
 conception of angelic agency is loftier. The word " angel " is found only 
 twice in Daniel, but angelic beings play a very important part.
 
 150 SUBORDINATE SUPERNATURAL BEINGS. 
 
 own proper names and exercise functions unknown to the 
 earlier writings. In Tobit, Eafael is the affable companion 
 and mentor of the young Tobias, occupies himself with 
 domestic matters in a genial human way, and shows himself 
 to be a clever man of affairs. Two other names appear in 
 Daniel: Gabriel is interpreter to the seer (Dan. viii. 16); 
 Michael is the guardian angel of Israel (Dan. x. 13) ; guar- 
 dian angels of other nations are spoken of, but not named ; 
 mention is made of holy " watchers " who are sent down as 
 agents of God. Enoch details the angelic history at great 
 length, with long lists of names and much specialization of 
 function. The question arises, How is this great expansion of 
 the angelic scheme to be explained ; may it be regarded as a 
 purely native development ? or must a foreign, especially a 
 Persian influence be appealed to ? 1 In the first place, it is to 
 be observed that the existence of a Persian influence on the 
 Jewish pneurnatology of this time is vouched for by the name 
 of the evil spirit in Tobit ; Asmodeus is confessedly the Per- 
 sian Aeshma daeva. It is also to be noted that the Persians 
 probably had at this time a well-developed system of super- 
 natural intelligences which was not borrowed by them, since 
 the greater part of it can be traced back to the old Aryan 
 material. 2 Alongside of the supreme God, Ahura-Mazda, 
 stood the six Amesha-gpentas and a host of other deities 
 and spirits who were invested with various functions in the 
 government and maintenance of the world. A special posi- 
 tion as guardians was assigned to certain star-deities (Tistrya 
 and three others), who presided over the four quarters of the 
 world, and to the Fravashis, who, whatever their origin, were 
 charged with the control of various departments of humr n 
 
 1 See Kohut, " Angelologie und Damonologie," and C. de Harlez, " DCS 
 Origines du Zoroastrisme," Paris, 1879 (originally appeared in the "Journal 
 Asiatique," 1878). 
 
 2 Spiegel, " Eranische Altertbumskunde," ii.
 
 SUBORDINATE SUPERNATURAL BEINGS. 151 
 
 life. It must be borne in mind that the Jews would prob- 
 ably take such ideas from popular beliefs rather than from 
 books ; for example, the character of the Asmodeus of Tobit 
 does not correspond exactly with that of the Aeshma of the 
 Persian sacred books, and the more natural explanation of 
 this difference is that the popular mythology diverged a little 
 from the theological standards, as has been true to a great 
 extent aniong Christian peoples. It is quite conceivable that 
 the Persian popular doctrine of guardian spirits was fuller 
 than that of the books (supposing, as is likely, that books 
 existed at this time), or differed from it in some details ; or 
 we may suppose that the idea of angels as guardians of par- 
 ticular nations originated among the Jews under Persian 
 influence. 1 Abundant opportunity for borrowing such con- 
 ceptions was afforded by the long residence of the exiles in 
 Babylonia after it became a Persian province. Ezekiel and 
 his successors showed themselves quite ready to adopt certain 
 Semitic-Babylonian ideas, and there was no reason why there 
 should not have been a similar willingness to receive sugges- 
 tions from the Persians. The scenes of the books of Esther, 
 Tobit, and Daniel lie in the Persian region. A general in- 
 fluence, therefore, is not at all improbable. All that need be 
 supposed is an expansion of existing Jewish ideas in the 
 direction of organization and specialization of function. The 
 supposition of borrowing is made more probable by the fact 
 that the angelic system in Daniel is not entirely in the line of 
 the preceding Old Testament development. Angels do not 
 appear as national guardians in the later post-biblical books. 
 In the New Testament there is one apparent reference to the 
 belief in the angelic guardianship of individuals (Matt, xviii. 
 
 1 An Old Testament point of attachment for this idea is found in the 
 Greek text of Deut. xxxii. 8 : " The Most High set the boundaries of the nations 
 according to the number of the angels of God," or, as the emended Hebrew 
 text would read : " The number of the sons of the Elohim," where the refer- 
 ence would be to the gods of the nations.
 
 152 SUBORDINATE SUPERNATURAL BEINGS. 
 
 10); the Michael of the New Testament Apocalypse has a 
 somewhat different coloring from the angel of that name in 
 Daniel, he is the prince and leader of the people of God, 
 but his conflict with the dragon connects him rather with 
 the old Babylonian myth of the fight between Bel and 
 Tiamat than with the function of guardianship. The names 
 of the biblical angels are Hebrew, which is what we might 
 expect on the supposition that the Jews took general sugges- 
 tions from the Persians, and worked them up in their own 
 manner. 
 
 The position of angels in the New Testament is in general 
 the same as in the Old Testament, but with noteworthy 
 modifications in some books. They are immortal (Luke xx- 
 36), and neither marry nor are given in marriage (Matt. xxii. 
 30) ; their special ordinary function is to minister to God's 
 people, particularly in times of doubt or distress, and it is 
 thought to be not unnatural that they should speak to men 
 (Acts xxiii. 9, a Pharisaic opinion, shared, no doubt, by Chris- 
 tians) ; they take a lively interest in men's spiritual expe- 
 riences (Luke xv. 10) ; they conduct the souls of the righteous 
 to paradise (Luke xvi. 22) ; they inflict disease on wicked men 
 (Acts xii. 23) ; they form a sort of heavenly society, before 
 which Christ will acknowledge his servants, in order that 
 they may be admitted to the privileges of this blessed com- 
 panionship (Luke xii. 8 ; Sev. iii. 5) ; they are to be the attend- 
 ants of the Son of Man when he shall come to judge the 
 world, it is they who will gather the elect, and remove the 
 wicked (Matt. xiii. 41 ; xxv. 31 ; 2 Thess. i. 7) ; they are them- 
 selves called "elect" (1 Tim. v. 21), chosen by God for his 
 service in distinction from those " angels " who pertain to the 
 Devil (Matt. xxv. 41 ; Eev.xii. 9), Satan, however, can assume 
 the form of an angel of light, for the purpose of deceiving 
 men, just as his ministers, false teachers of religion, present 
 themselves as apostles of Christ (2 Cor. xi. 14, 15) ; believers
 
 SUBORDINATE SUPERNATURAL BEINGS. 153 
 
 are attended by angels, who have special access to God (Matt, 
 xviii. 10 ; Acts xii. 15) ; the natural inference is that each 
 believer has a guardian angel, who represents him in the 
 divine presence and cares for his interests, an extension 
 of the conception in the book of Tobit. 
 
 Some peculiar representations are found in Paul's Epistles. 
 Believers, it is said (1 Cor. vi. 3) are to judge angels (whether 
 good or Jmd angels is not clear) to be superior to them in 
 dignity, doubtless in consequence of their near relation to 
 Christ, a view which may be compared with that of Luke 
 xx. 36, where they are thought of as equal to the good 
 angels ; cf. in 1 Pet. i. 12 the statement that these last 
 desire to understand the things of the gospel, the inference 
 being that they are not completely enlightened therein. 
 More difficult is his opinion that women in the church- 
 gatherings, or while praying or prophesying, should be veiled 
 " on account of the angels ( 1 Cor. xi. 10). The veil, as the 
 sign of subordination, is understood to symbolize man's 
 authority over woman but what has this to do with 
 angels ? It cannot be intended simply to express respect for 
 them ; this would be equally obligatory on men. It cannot 
 be to teach them, whether they be holy or unholy, a lesson 
 of subordination , this seems a forced idea. Nor is it nat- 
 ural to regard the expression as meaning that the angels will 
 report the conduct of the women to God ; the apostle would 
 hardly thus refer to a general angelic function in connection 
 with a particular custom. His intention seems to be to 
 insist that the woman shall wear the badge of subordination 
 or ownership in the presence of beings who represent, having 
 had a part in establishing, that order of creation in which 
 the woman was made subject to the man. In that case we 
 infer that he understood the " let us make " of Gen. i. 26 as 
 including the angels. In Rom. viii. 38 a hierarchical consti- 
 tution of the angelic world is hinted at in the expressions
 
 154 EVIL SPIRITS. 
 
 " angels, principalities, powers," the two last terms being not 
 further defined. These beings are, however, here presented 
 as hostile to the Christian life, as in Eph. vi 12, Col. ii 15 j 1 
 while in Eph. i. 21, iii. 10, Col. i. 16, ii. 10, they are obe- 
 dient servants of God. It appears, therefore, that these ex- 
 pressions are used by Paul and the authors of Ephesians 
 and Colossians in a twofold sense, of both good and bad 
 supernatural powers. 
 
 This later angelic scheme appears thus to be the Old Tes- 
 tament system, organized under Persian influence into a 
 double hierarchy (good and bad), and in the Colossian heresy 
 (Col. ii. 18) tinged with the gnostic thought which repre- 
 sented the angels as being, both ontologically, and as objects 
 of worship and instruments of salvation, the connecting link 
 between God and man. In the Christian scheme proper they 
 were subordinate to Christ, and probably in general to the 
 divine spirit, though in one place (Acts viii. 26, 29) the same 
 act is ascribed at one time to an angel, at another to the 
 spirit. On this point there was doubtless fluctuation of view, 
 by reason of the fluctuating conception of the spirit. 
 
 4. Coming now to the doctrine of evil spirits, we take for 
 our starting-point the general Old Testament representation 
 of the spirit-world which is referred to above. This somewhat 
 colorless mass of beings seems to have been gradually differ- 
 entiated in accordance wi*h the advance of Jewish ethical 
 thought stimulated by outside influences. One might suppose 
 that the highly developed Babylonian pneumatology would 
 have measurably affected the Israelitish exiles ; but the liter- 
 ature hardly favors such a supposition, evil spirits proper 
 do not appear in the Old Testament. The earliest post- 
 exilian evil being is Satan ; for the explanation of the later 
 
 1 The case is different in Gal. i. 8, where the preaching of another gospel 
 by an "angel from heaven '' is stated as a mere, and in fact impossible, sup- 
 position in hyperbolical fashion.
 
 EVIL SPIRITS. 155 
 
 demoniacal system we are rather led to look to the contact 
 of the Jews with Persian (and perhaps with Greek) ideas. 
 The Mazdean religion had a large machinery of evil spirits, 
 to which was ascribed the production of evil effects on the 
 body and the soul of man, though there seems to have been 
 no well-delined belief in demoniacal possession; the long 
 residence of the Jews on Persian soil may have given them 
 familiarity with this spiritual apparatus. Of direct Greek 
 influence on this doctrine there is no proof ; but that it was 
 not wholly ineffective may perhaps be inferred from the 
 usage of the Septuagint translators, who have given us our 
 word "demon." They employed this familiar Greek term 1 to 
 render Hebrew expressions for heathen deities, idols, and 
 wilderness-spirits (Deut. xxxii. 17; Ps. xcv. 5; cvi. 37; Isa. 
 Ixv. 11 ; xiii. 21 ; xxxiv. 14) ; that is, for supernatural powers 
 in general hostile to the God of Israel. This sense of the word 
 maintained itself into the New Testament times ; it is found, 
 for example, in a passage (1 Cor. x. 20, 21) in which Paul 
 appears to say that the eating of things offered to Gentile 
 deities was having communion with demons. 2 The related 
 sense of evil, indwelling spirit also attached itself to current 
 Greek usage. But before examining this point, we must look 
 at earlier Hebrew developments of the world of evil spiritual 
 agencies. 
 
 1 Dalmon, used by Homer (H. i. 222) and the tragic poets in the sense of 
 " god," " divine being," sometimes also with the idea of hurtfulness, came to 
 be employed specifically to signify secondary deities, and finally the shades of 
 the dead. Plato (Apol. i. 5) distinguishes between gods and demons, suggest- 
 ing that the latter are children of gods. Dalmonlon is likewise equivalent to 
 "deity ; " the charge against Socrates was (Xen. Mem. i. 1, 1) that he refused 
 to acknowledge publicly the gods (theous) of the city, and introduced other 
 new deities (daimonia). Socrates' own daimonion was a genius or guardian 
 who told him what he ought and ought not to do (Mem. iv. 8, 1). From this 
 conception in part came the later Jewish nse of the term, on which see below 
 
 2 This statement seems to rest on the old idea that sacrifices were acts of 
 communion between the god and the worshipper, both partaking of the flesh 
 of the animal offered.
 
 156 EVIL SPIRITS. 
 
 We have already seen that before the exile no one figure 
 stands out prominently from the mass of spirits who do the 
 bidding of Yahwe ; he is absolutely supreme, and his minis- 
 ters perform whatever good or bad offices he assigns them. 
 But just after the return from Babylon, a new spiritual actor 
 in the affairs of Israel appears in the shape of an "adver- 
 sary," a Satan, whose function it is to oppose the welfare of 
 the chosen people. The prophet Zechariah pictures the high 
 priest Joshua, the representative of the nation, as pleading 
 his people's cause before the angel of the Lord ; he is opposed 
 by "the Satan," whose object is to prevent the rebuilding 
 of Jerusalem ; the Satan is rebuked, and Joshua is promised 
 that if he will faithfully keep God's commands the nation 
 shall be established. The figure of the great spiritual adver- 
 sary of the nation seems here to be in the act of taking 
 shape. He is the embodiment of all of Israel's difficulties 
 and enemies. Israelitish thought, constantly grappling with 
 the problem of the suffering of Yahwe's people, had appar- 
 ently reached the conviction that the opposition to the na- 
 tional well-being must come from a spirit hostile to God. 
 This is a great advance on the pre-exilian conception of the 
 constitution of the spirit- world ; we can only suppose that 
 the conditions of Jewish life in Babylonia had induced rapid 
 progress in this direction. In the book of Job we may recog- 
 nize further progress in tKe elaboration of the idea of Satan. 
 In the prophet, his relations are with Israel ; in Job, with 
 humanity. He traverses the earth with no benevolent in- 
 tent ; he discusses Job's character with cynical acuteness ; he 
 induces God to subject his servant to severest tests simply 
 to try his integrity. He is a malignant and powerful being, 
 but he is not detached from the person and service of God ; 
 on the contrary, he is a member of the divine court, presents 
 himself among the sons of God before the divine throne, is 
 called on by Yahwe to make report of his doings, arid re-
 
 EVIL SPIRITS. 157 
 
 ceives from him his commission to test the character of Job. 
 Such also is probably his position in Zechariah. 1 The repre- 
 sentation in Job is an imaginative one ; Satan appears only 
 in the court of heaven, in the dwelling-place of God and 
 his ministers. In 1 Chron. xxi. 1 he is introduced in a more 
 commonplace manner as tempting David to number Israel. 
 The progress involved in this statement may be seen by a 
 comparison of 2 Sam. xxiv. 1, where, in the description of 
 the same incident, it is Yahwe who incites the king to the 
 act of disobedience. Between the two statements (an inter- 
 val of probably two or three hundred years) the feeling had 
 grown up that instigation to evil could not properly be re- 
 ferred to God ; an evil spirit becomes the agent of temptation 
 to sin. The advance in this representation consists, as is in- 
 timated above, in the completer introduction of Satan into 
 man's every-day life. In Zechariah, he is the adversary of 
 the nation ; in Job, his r6le is that of slanderer of righteous 
 men (the nation also being perhaps had in mind) ; in Chron- 
 icles, while the event in question is a national one, it may 
 probably be inferred that he is regarded as a general inciter 
 to evil, entering into the conduct of man's spiritual life. 
 
 After 1 Chron. xxi. 1, Satan is mentioned no more in the 
 Old Testament, and rarely in the extra- biblical books ; the 
 two works in which he appears treat him in very differ- 
 ent ways. The first attempt at a spiritual interpretation of 
 the. serpent of Gen. iii. occurs in the Wisdom of Solomon 
 
 1 It is difficult to fix the chronological relation of Job to Zechariah pre- 
 cisely. Even if we regard the man Job as the representative of Israel, and 
 the thought of the book as springing out of the exilian suffering, it is not 
 necessary to place its composition during the exile. The condition and feel- 
 ing of suffering doubtless continued after the return. The elaborate argu- 
 mentation of the book rather points to a later period. The portraiture of 
 Satan in Job seems to be more developed than that in Zechariah, and the 
 prologue seems to belong to the original scheme of the work. It may be 
 added that the interpretation of the person of Job as a representative of Israel 
 does not accord with the evident non-national coloring of the book.
 
 158 EVIL SPIRITS. 
 
 (ii. 24). The narrative in Genesis recognizes in the tempter 
 of Eve only an animal form, endowed with intelligence and 
 speech. 1 This account, apparently the survival and recon- 
 struction of an old Semitic myth, 2 stands isolated in Gen- 
 esis ; it is mentioned nowhere else in the Old Testament. 
 But after the fifth century B. c. (when the narrative prob- 
 ably assumed its present shape) the feeling would naturally 
 arise in some circles that so tremendous an event as the 
 introduction of sin and death into the world could not be 
 referred to the agency of beast ; the serpent-form would 
 come to be regarded as the vehicle chosen by a great spir- 
 itual adversary to vent on the first man the hate which 
 according to the earlier books inspired his attempts on Israel 
 and Job. The name given in Wisdom to this wicked spirit 
 is Diabolos, the accuser or adversary (the Greek translation 
 of the Hebrew name Satan). It can hardly be doubted that 
 in the mind of the writer this being was identical with the 
 Satan of the Jewish books. " Through envy of the Devil," 
 so the passage runs (that is, envy of man's immortality or 
 happiness), " death came into the world." Here the activity 
 of the Adversary assumes the largest proportions, he has 
 succeeded in inflicting the greatest evil on the human race. 
 The book of Enoch, with its fondness for hierarchical organi- 
 zation, makes Satan the head and ruler of evil spirits (liii. 3), 
 and places under him a hsrd of satans who do his bidding in 
 wicked ministrations. 
 
 That the progress of the idea of Satan as tempter was slow 
 seems probable, not only from the infrequency with which 
 he is introduced (lie does not appear between Enoch and the 
 New Testament), but also from the fact that neither Enoch 
 
 1 Josephus also, who, as belonging to a priestly family, was probably well 
 instructed in the orthodox Jewish theology of the time, here recognizes only 
 the animal serpent (Ant. i. 1, 4). 
 
 2 The conflict of the dragon Tiamat with the gods.
 
 EVIL SPIRITS. 159 
 
 nor Josephus connects him with the serpent of Genesis. Pos- 
 sibly this identification began in Egypt in a Jewish circle in- 
 fluenced by Greek speculation (represented by the Wisdom of 
 Solomon), and only gradually penetrated into Palestine. The 
 data are, however, insufficient for determining to what extent 
 this view was held by Palestinian Jews before the beginning 
 of our era. It is certain that Satan appears as a well-devel- 
 oped figure in the earliest parts of the New Testament, and 
 we may hence conclude that in the preceding two centuries 
 he had formed a distinct part of the Jewish belief. The 
 strenuous Jewish monotheism may have been unfavorable to 
 the easy recognition of so powerful an opponent of God. 1 
 
 Alongside of the development of the conception of a great 
 spiritual adversary, there grew up a history of fallen angels, 
 the starting-point of which was the account in Gen. vi. 
 1, 2. The origin and date of this passage are doubtful. The 
 " sons of the Elohim " are in general angels (this expression 
 never meaning anything else in the Old Testament), or more 
 exactly, they are members of the class of Elohim-beings, 
 the Israelitish representatives of the old divinities. Inter- 
 marriages between deities and human beings abound in all 
 mythologies ; such alliances, surviving in a monotheistic sys- 
 tem, would naturally take the shape of the Genesis-story. 
 This may be the remnant of a mythical narrative brought 
 by the Hebrews from Mesopotamia to Canaan, or it may 
 have come to the Jews from the Babylonians during the 
 exile, or from the Assyrians before the exile. Eor our pres- 
 ent purposes, it does not greatly matter which one of these 
 explanations we adopt. The incident is not elsewhere men- 
 tioned in the Old Testament, and had no perceptible influ- 
 ence on the Jewish thought of the Old Testament time. The 
 story appears to be introduced in Genesis, not to account for 
 
 1 The later Jewish Satanology also seems to have been somewhat uncer- 
 tain in tone. See Weber, " System," 48, 54.
 
 160 EVIL SPIRITS. 
 
 the increasing wickedness of man, and thus as a partial ex- 
 planation of the flood (for the writer does not condemn the 
 procedure of the angels), but to set forth the origin of the 
 ancient heroes, the men of renown ; the incident is narrated 
 with the utmost impersonality, simply as an historical fact. 
 The book of Enoch, which takes this material and expands 
 it at great length, adopts an altogether different tone. It 
 denounces the conduct of the angels as the height of im- 
 piety, gives the names of their leaders, and ascribes to them 
 the beginnings of all the wickedness of the world. They 
 are said to have taught men the science of war, the art of 
 writing, and other hurtful things (ch. Ixix.). Their leaders 
 are Azazel and Seinyaza ; their fate is to be bound, hand and 
 foot, and imprisoned till the day of judgment, when they are 
 to be cast into the fire (ch. x.). This elaborate narrative is 
 an attempt at a philosophical history of civilization, following 
 and expanding the idea of Gen. i.-xi. ; it undertakes to give 
 the beginnings of the arts of life, which it thinks it necessary 
 to refer to a supernatural origin, and, curiously enough, to anti- 
 godly agency. 1 So primitive and malistic a view, one would 
 suppose, could have bad no wide currency. The whole angel- 
 ological scheme seems not to have made any great impres- 
 sion on the Jewish mind ; part of the description in Enoch 
 is adopted in the New Testament Apocalypse (xx. 1-3) ; the 
 fate of the angels who-eame down from heaven is briefly 
 summed up in Jude 6 ; and there is perhaps an allusion in 
 Luke x. 18 to the same occurrence in the statement that 
 Satan fell like lightning from heaven ; but the body of the 
 New Testament thought ignores this episode. It was re- 
 
 1 How the author construed the parallel but dissimilar account of the ori- 
 gins of civilization in Gen. iv. 16-24 is not clear. The descent of the angels 
 ig put in the days of Jared (Gen. v. 18, cf. Irad, Gen. iv. 18) in the book of 
 Jubilees (4), and in the Greek text of Enoch (vi. 6), a bit of folk-etymology 
 (" Jared" means "descending") ; the author of Enoch probably held that the 
 Cainites learned the arts from the angels.
 
 EVIL SPIRITS. 161 
 
 served for post- biblical Christianity to elaborate the fall of 
 the angels into a dogma. In the Old Testament neither their 
 fall nor their creation is mentioned ; their existence is sim- 
 ply assumed, as in Job xxxviii. 7, where it is said that at 
 the creation of the world the morning stars sang together 
 and all the sons of God shouted for joy. This reticence re- 
 specting their creation is easily understood if we consider 
 the angels to be a survival and development out of the old 
 deities, or Elohim -beings, whose participation in the work of 
 the creation of the world is involved in the " let us make 
 man " of Gen. i. 26. The Hebrews, receiving and accepting 
 these beings as coeval with Yahwe, might naturally not 
 think of them as included in the created world ; there was 
 an old Babylonian myth (given in the cuneiform creation 
 tablet) which derived all the gods from two primitive water- 
 beings, but there is no clear trace of this in the Old Testa- 
 ment. 1 Those who insist on seeing the creation of the angels 
 in the biblical history of creation either prefer to insert it 
 between the first and second verses of the first chapter of 
 Genesis, and find in the angelic apostasy and rebellion the 
 explanation of the chaos which they hold to have supervened 
 on God's first good creation, 2 or they hold it to be included 
 in Gen. ii. 1, where, however, the " host of them " refers to 
 the physical creation (as in Ps. cxlviii. 5). 3 
 
 In this connection we may note the curious figures of 
 Leviathan, Behemoth, and Rahab, which appear in the Old 
 Testament in several different senses. In Job xli. 1, Levi- 
 
 1 The abyss (tekom) of Gen. i. 2 is the primeval earth-covering, out of 
 which (vs 20, 21) come marine creatures. If there is a faint survival in 
 verse 2 (the "wind" or "spirit" of God moved or hovered over the waters) 
 of the old conception of the plastic water, it has been quite transformed by the 
 monotheistic feeling. On Leviathan, Behemoth, and Rahab, see below. 
 
 2 Compare the Talmudic statement that the present successful creation was 
 only accomplished after several failures, Weber, " System," 43. 
 
 3 In Neh. ix. 6, the "host of heaven," which worships God, is different 
 from the "host " which he is said to have made. 
 
 11
 
 162 EVIL SPIRITS. 
 
 athan l seems to be the Egyptian crocodile, or else a myth- 
 ical beast, and in Ps. civ. 26 some huge sea-animal ; it occurs 
 twice as a symbol of Egypt in Ps. Ixxiv. 21, apparently 
 under the form of the crocodile, and in Isa. xxvii. 1, where it 
 is pictured as a winding serpent. The use of the term in 
 Isaiah connects itself with the mythical reference in Job iii. 8 
 (cf. xxvL 13), where the Leviathan is apparently the celes- 
 tial serpent who swallows or otherwise obscures the sun and 
 the moon, and who may be roused by enchantments ; in this 
 late form it is a mythical embodiment of the black storm- 
 cloud or the eclipsing shadow regarded as a hostile demon. 
 It is probable that the portraiture of the dragon in the New 
 Testament Apocalypse receives its coloring in part (see Rev. 
 xii. 4, 13) from this source. An earlier conception is found 
 in Enoch Ix. (a Noachic fragment), where Leviathan is a 
 female monster dwelling in the depth of the sea ; in 2 Esdras 
 vi. 49-52, the creation of this beast is assigned to the fifth 
 day ; and it is stated that it is to be devoured by them whom 
 God shall choose. With Leviathan is associated P>ehemoth 
 (Enoch Ix. 8, where it is masculine), after Job xl. and xli., 
 and in the Talmud it is declared that these creatures are 
 to be the food of Israel in the coming age of blessedness. 
 There is a singular resemblance between this conception of 
 two great water-monsters and the Babylonian myth above- 
 mentioned of the two primitive water principles, Apsu and 
 Tiamat, male and female, 2 from whom proceeded all other be- 
 ings. The resemblance between Leviathan and Tiamat can 
 hardly be accidental ; both are female, and both are marine 
 and celestial dragons which make war against the good 
 powers. The Rahab of Job ix. 13, xxvi. 12 (cf. Isa. xxx. 7), 
 
 1 The origin of the name is obscure ; it may signify any long beast, and 
 so be equivalent to "serpent," or "dragon " (Isa. xxvii. 1). 
 
 2 Cf. Enoch liv. 8, where the water in the heavens is masculine, and the 
 water on the earth feminine.
 
 EVIL SPIRITS. 163 
 
 is a similar demonic conception. These three figures are in- 
 teresting as instances of the manner in which the Jewish 
 religious thought dealt with the old mythical material, grad- 
 ually humanizing it, and more and more holding it aloof 
 from the essential spiritual framework of theology. A vin- 
 dictive dragon, originally the destructive waters of ocean or 
 sky, becomes finally a beast whose flesh is to furnish food 
 to the people of God. 
 
 The Satan of the New Testament is substantially identical 
 with the pre-Christian figure, only modified, more sharply 
 marked off, and more highly elaborated, in accordance with 
 the characteristic moral-spiritual ideas and intensity of Chris- 
 tianity. He is the chief of the kingdom of evil spirits and 
 angels (Matt. xii. 26 ; xxv. 41 ); he has power to inflict disease 
 on the bodies of men (Luke xiii. 16 ; 1 Cor. v. 5 ; 1 Tim. i. 20) ; 
 he tempts to sin (Matt. iv. 1-11 ; Eph. vi. 11), and may be re- 
 sisted (Jas. iv. 7) ; he enters into and controls bad men (Luke xx. 
 3, 31 ; John viii. 44) ; he is the opponent of the truth (Mark iv. 
 15 ; Matt. xiii. 39 ; 1 Thess. ii. 18 ; Rev. iii. 9 ; 1 Pet. v. 8); his 
 hatred is said in one passage (Jude 9) to extend to the dead 
 body of Moses -, 1 he is identified with the dragon and with the 
 serpent (Rev. xii. 9 ; xx. 2, 7, cf. John viii. 44 ; 1 Tim. ii. 14), 
 and the names Satan and the Devil are used interchangeably ; 
 he is to be cast into hell (Matt. xxv. 41, and cf. Luke x. 18 ; 
 Rev. xx. 10). He is, in a word, the prince and god of this 
 world (2 Cor. iv. 4 ; John xiv. 30), the head and embodiment 
 of all those influences in human life which are hostile to 
 heavenly godliness. He includes in himself the Satan and 
 the Azazel of Enoch and the prince of the demons, Beelze- 
 bub (Matt. xii. 24) ; he unites in his person all morally evil 
 qualities ; he is the leader of all those spiritual bad powers 
 whose development has been traced above. In the New 
 
 1 On this story see my " Quotations in the New Testament," New York, 
 Scribner, 1884, pp. 250 f.
 
 164 EVIL SPIRITS. 
 
 Testament, as in the pre-Christian literature, his position and 
 functions, and especially his relation to God, are not clearly 
 defined. 1 No attempt is made to show how his enormous 
 power and wicked activity are to be brought into harmony 
 with the divine omnipotent goodness. He is no mere symbol 
 or personification of the wicked elements of life ; he is an ob- 
 jective being, acting apparently without limitations of time 
 and space. In some cases his power appears to be repre- 
 sented as co-ordinate with that of God. If God chooses those 
 who are to believe unto salvation, it is Satan who blinds the 
 minds of the unbelieving, that the light of the gospel of the 
 glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should not dawn 
 upon them (2 Cor. iv. 4). The title, "God of this world," 
 implies vast power, and reminds us of the Persian rival of 
 Ahura-Mazda. But on the other hand, the New Testament 
 has a perfectly distinct conviction of the absolute supremacy 
 of God. He is the sole fountain of -power in the universe ; 
 at the end, the kingdom is to be his, death being swallowed 
 up (1 Cor. xv. 24, 54), and in the Apocalypse (xx. 10), 
 Satan is to be tormented forever and forever. He represents 
 the evil of the world, and is to endure till evil shall be 
 blotted out by the perfecting of the righteous and the im- 
 prisonment of the wicked. There is no hint of a possible 
 change in Satan's moral character. The New Testament 
 leaves him, at the beginning of the new dispensation, as the 
 embodiment of evil, to abide forever, but in chains and dark- 
 ness, shorn of his power, impotent any longer to disturb the 
 moral order of the universe. Its solution of the problem 
 of evil is practical, not logical or philosophical. 
 
 1 There is no distinct chronological development of his person in the New 
 Testament. His activity is in general more physical in the Apocalypse and 
 Jude and in the demoniacal representations of the Gospels, more mental and 
 spiritual in the Epistles and the Fourth Gospel, a difference that seems 
 to result chiefly from the subject-matter and the religious point of view of 
 the writers.
 
 EVIL SPIRITS. 165 
 
 While we may thus trace the general line of progress of 
 the figure of Satan, it is less easy to account for its origin. 
 It appears suddenly in Zechariah and Job, apparently with- 
 out preparation. The only individualized evil form of which 
 we read in the earlier literature is the spirit of 1 Kings xxii. 
 21, and that differs from Satan in two important respects : it 
 belongs to a different class of beings, and it has no distinct 
 ethical character; Satan is not a "spirit," but one of the 
 " sons of the Elohim " (Job i. 6), and he is distinctly malevo- 
 lent. Both these points have significance in the Israelitish 
 religious development: the Elohim-beings have their own 
 history ; and the ascription of moral evil to an Israelitish 
 supernatural form seems to mark a turning-point in the 
 national conception of life, it is the beginning of the at- 
 tempt to separate the domain of evil from that of God. 
 When the figure of Satan appears abruptly, just after the 
 close of the exile, we naturally ask whether it is a product of 
 the unassisted Israelitish religious consciousness or the out- 
 come in part of foreign influence. But foreign influence 
 competent to produce such a result in whole or in part, it 
 does not seem possible to discover. The Jews with whom 
 the prophet Zechariah returned to Palestine were in contact 
 with the Persians too short a time to borrow a great religious 
 idea from them, even if the latter then had the Ahriman of 
 the A vesta. Among the Babylonians, with whom the Jews 
 had lived half a century, we know of no great spiritual adver- 
 sary ; they had evil spirits, as the Jews had, but no such idea 
 as that of Satan. It is to be noted that the Satan, when we 
 first meet him, is distinctly incorporated into the well-devel- 
 oped monotheism of the time ; he is a servant of Yahwe, 
 though an enemy of Yahwe's friends. Such a conception 
 presupposes a considerable period of development ; and in 
 spite of the absence of earlier details, it seems most in accord- 
 ance with the facts to regard it as a native Jewish growth.
 
 ]66 EVIL SPIRITS. 
 
 We know that the sons of the Elohim had formed part of the 
 national-religious material, probably of the folk-religion ; this 
 element may have been ignored by the pre-exilian and exilian 
 prophets, as having for them no spiritual significance. But 
 the national history during the seventh and sixth centuries 
 called up serious problems and stimulated ethical-religious 
 thought. In particular, men's minds were occupied with 
 the question of Israel's suffering, why, it was asked, had 
 Yahwe permitted hostile hands to bear so heavily on his 
 people? The prophets had their answer, it was the pun- 
 ishment of the nation's sin. But after a while this answer 
 became unsatisfactory to certain thinkers who held that 
 the nation was not all sinful ; why should the righteous 
 be involved in the deserved suffering of their unrighteous 
 fellow-countrymen ? To one man at least it seemed (Isa. liii.) 
 that the affliction of the righteous Israel was vicarious, that 
 the end in the divine procedure was to bring not only all 
 Israel, but also the Gentiles, to himself (Isa. xlix. 1-6). This 
 exalted view of the situation did not, however, commend it- 
 self to all the prophet's contemporaries; it was too lofty 
 and broad, and perhaps too natural. The larger human ques- 
 tion also why good men in general suffered was pressing 
 for a solution ; and the idea of individual moral- religious 
 discipline seems not to have presented itself, or, if considered, 
 to have been held to be insufficient. The explanation in 
 both cases was sought in the unfriendly activity of a great 
 supernatural power, one of those beings who, allied in nature 
 to Yahwe and associated with him, though in a subordinate 
 way, in the control of the world, wielded an important influ- 
 ence over the affairs of men. How such a being came to be 
 unfriendly is not told in the Old Testament : Zechariah in- 
 troduces the Satan without a word of comment ; the book of 
 Job accounts for the possibility of his procedure by the pur- 
 pose of Yahwe to test and demonstrate the integrity of his
 
 EVIL SPIRITS. . 167 
 
 servant. Both books seem to assume that the person of the 
 Adversary was well known ; how long it had been known it 
 is impossible to say. We can only hold in general that the 
 conception of a supernatural being hostile to good men was 
 forced on the Jewish religious consciousness by the circum- 
 stances of the time, and that such a being would naturally 
 be looked for in the ranks of the sons of the Elohim, the 
 companions and servants of Yahwe from time immemorial ; 
 alongside of the good "angel, of Yahwe" might stand an 
 equally powerful being with a tinge of malevolence in his 
 nature, possibly the dim survival of an old hurtful deity, 
 more probably the product of a reflective age, which wished 
 somehow to isolate evil from good. The general parallelism 
 between this and the Persian scheme is obvious, both arose 
 out of the same ethical-religious necessity, but there seems 
 to be no sufficient ground for supposing an historical connec- 
 tion between the two at this stage. 
 
 It is otherwise with the later Jewish development of mor- 
 ally evil supernatural agencies. After the Jews had been a 
 hundred years subjects of the Persian empire and resident in 
 Persian communities, they may easily be supposed to have 
 adopted ideas from their neighbors. The possibility that the 
 r6le assigned to Azazel in Lev. xvi. was in part determined 
 by Persian influence has already been suggested. 1 As to the 
 times of Tobit and Enoch there can be no doubt. The 
 Asmodaeus of Tobit is Persian ; and the elaborate angelology 
 of Enoch is most naturally explained (as in the case of the 
 book of Daniel) as due to an impulse derived from the Per- 
 sian system. The description in Enoch is based on the 
 account in Gen. vi., and the " sons of God " are identified 
 with angels. The foundation is old-Semitic ; but the organiza- 
 
 1 A similar suggestion might be made in regard to the identification of 
 the serpent of Gen iii. with Satan. For the objection to this view see above, 
 pp. 158f. It is possible, though hardly probable, that Wisd. of Sol. got its in- 
 terpretation from a Persian source.
 
 168 EVIL SPIRITS. 
 
 tion of the angels, and their individualization by names and 
 by the assignment of individual functions in the development 
 of human civilization, is foreign. That the names are He- 
 brew (in contrast with the Persian name Asmodaeus) results 
 from the fact that the figures are Hebrew. The book of 
 Enoch never attained canonical authority ; and its angelic 
 names seem not to have been adopted by succeeding gener- 
 ations, its details were too bizarre for the sober Jewish 
 thought. The idea of the organization of the evil angels 
 under the leadership of Satan commended itself, and is found 
 in the New Testament ; but it has little prominence, except 
 in the Apocalypse ; in the practical religious life the evil 
 supernatural activity is concentrated in the person of the 
 chief, and his subordinate angels practically disappear. The 
 part which they might play in the infliction of evil on men 
 is assigned to the spirits. 
 
 The history of the class of evil intelligences called "spirits" 
 is no less remarkable than that of Satan and his angels. It 
 culminates in the idea of demoniacal possession, a concep- 
 tion which has its roots in the Old Testament, but suddenly 
 assumes enormous proportions in the first century of Chris- 
 tianity. According to the old Israelitish belief, as we have 
 seen, all mental affections (as in the case of Saul, 1 Sam. xvi.) 
 were ascribed to the agency of spirits sent from God; and 
 these remain throughout the Old Testament morally unde- 
 fined, they work good and evil alike. The later differentia- 
 tion into two classes was effected by Jewish advance in dis- 
 tinctness of ethical thought, and by the influence of foreign 
 ideas, Persian, Greek, and other. 
 
 It is in the book of Tobit that we find the first mention of 
 a definite relation between an evil spirit and a human being 
 (Asmodaeus and Sara) ; in Enoch the fallen angels appear in 
 human shape, and affect men rather by ordinary human inter- 
 course than by direct influence on the soul. The Greek idea
 
 EVIL SPIRITS. 169 
 
 is visible in the passage of Josephus (" War," vii. 6, 3) which 
 assumes that sickness is produced by demons who are no 
 other than the spirits of the wicked. We have no further 
 details on this point in Jewish literature earlier than the 
 New Testament ; but that the belief in demonic influence 
 continued among the Jews is evident from the Talmud, 
 which makes abundant mention of evil spirits and magical 
 processes, expanding the Old Testament spiritual material, 
 and dressing out the old narratives with exuberance of pic- 
 turesque legend (Weber, " System," 54). The Jews had in 
 the mean time become members of the Eoman Empire, in 
 which the belief in magic and exorcism was general. There 
 was, about the beginning of our era, a sort of revivification of 
 the primeval faith. The old machinery of gods had almost 
 disappeared in cultivated circles. Men ridiculed the Olym- 
 pian deities and even the patron gods of the Eoman State, 
 and took refuge in those occult powers and processes which 
 were credible because they were at once visible and unintel- 
 ligible ; they satisfied the demand for the marvellous without 
 offending the science and philosophy of the day. 1 Whether 
 this foreign belief affected the Jews cannot be definitely de- 
 termined; it seems probable that from so wide-spread an 
 opinion some influence made itself felt in Palestine. The 
 Palestinian belief was in its general material old-Israelitish ; 
 but it had received the important modification of the differ- 
 entiation of the spirits into good and bad. The good, how- 
 ever, seem partly to have been merged in the body of the 
 
 1 Cicero, in the introduction to his work on divination, declares that there 
 is no nation that does not believe in the possibility of foretelling the future. 
 Juvenal (Sat. vi.) testifies to the devotion of the Roman women to Chaldean 
 and Judean supernatural arts, and Apuleius, in the Golden Ass, speaks of 
 magic arts (by which, for example, a woman transforms herself into a bird 
 and the hero into an ass) as a familiar thing in his time (second century of 
 our era). See on the Greek and Roman doctrine of demons of this period the 
 remarks of L. Friedlander, " Sittengeschichte Roms," (Leipzig, 1881), pp. 
 486-488, and on the belief in miracles, pp. 517 ff.
 
 170 EVIL SPIRITS. 
 
 good angels as the ministers of God's beneficent dealings with 
 men, and partly to have been absorbed in the divine spirit, 
 which came more and more to be regarded as the source of 
 ethically good spiritual influence on the soul. We read of no 
 organization of good " spirits " ; in the New Testament the 
 normally sound life is attributed to the spirit of God, while it 
 is certain peculiar abnormal evil phenomena, especially those 
 connected with mental aberration, the explanation of which 
 is held to lie in the agency of bad powers. 
 
 The representation of insanity as demoniacal possession 
 was not a new one. It is found in the Old Testament 
 (Saul) ; the ecstasies of prophets, seers, and priestesses were 
 sometimes akin to madness (1 Sam. xix. 24, Mic. i. 8, and 
 the Pythia). Such a frightful distortion of the human soul 
 was not unnaturally looked on as the result of supernatural 
 influence. The unhappy victims of possession were driven 
 out from among men and forced to dwell in tombs and 
 desolate places; it was natural that Jesus, in his mission 
 of mercy, should meet these unfortunates and try to alle- 
 viate their misery and restore them to their right minds; 
 doubtless many of them needed only sympathy and care, 
 and few of them were without a trace of humanity which 
 might be successfully appealed to. 
 
 In the New Testament, demoniacs form a separate class, 
 being distinguished from the sick, epileptic, and palsied 
 (Matt. iv. 24); they appear to abound everywhere, and 
 their healing forms a prominent part of the work of Jesus 
 and his disciples. The demons inhabit the bodies and 
 souls of men, so identifying themselves with human spirits 
 that the two personalities are not always distinguished. 
 They are conscious of their subordinate relation to God ; 
 they believe in him and tremble (James ii. 19), while they 
 pursue their anti-godly career. They acknowledge the au- 
 thority of the name of Christ (Matt. viii. 29). They are
 
 EVIL SPIRITS. 171 
 
 identified with heathen deities (1 Cor. x. 20, 21 ; Rev. ix. 20 ; 
 Acts xvi. 16) ; Satan, their prince, receives the name of the 
 old Philistine god, Beelzebub (Matt, xii 24). Piocesses tf 
 exorcism are mentioned in Acts xix. 13-16 (cf. passage 
 cited above from Josephus); but Jesus and his disciples 
 expelled the spirits by a word. No account of their origin 
 is given in the New Testament ; they are numerous (Mark 
 v. 9) ; they belong to the kingdom of Satan, beyond this 
 nothing is said. They are the evil spirits of the Old Testa- 
 ment, organized under Persian and other influence, and de- 
 veloped into sharper antagonism with the kingdom of God 
 by their contact with Christianity. 
 
 The belief in demonic possession long remained in the 
 Christian world, passing after a while into the theory of 
 witchcraft, then slowly disappearing. The established be- 
 lief in the orderly processes of nature makes it impossible 
 for the present day ; the Christian world no longer holds to 
 it as an existing phenomenon. It was the product of an 
 unscientific age, a part of the general attempt to construct 
 a system of intermediate powers between God and man, and 
 tJ disjoin the realm of evil from the immediate divine 
 activity. This latter purpose it did not really accomplish, 
 since in both Old Testament and New Testament God 
 either enjoins or permits the activity of the wicked spirits. 
 But the religious thought of the biblical times found in 
 this scheme a satisfactory solution of the problem of evil, 
 confronting the fact of present mal-arrangement with the 
 hope of future regeneration. The New Testament thus pre- 
 sents the final shaping of the old animistic material. The 
 ancient spirits are in part transformed into wicked demons 
 which, suffered by God for a time, are eventually to be 
 brought to naught. In the general history of religious 
 thought they may be looked on as a temporary embodiment 
 of that evil which in the Christian conception is finally to
 
 172 EVIL SPIRITS. 
 
 succumb to the higher ethical power which belongs to the 
 essential constitution of things. 
 
 *A general review of the doctrine of evil spirits in Old 
 Testament and New Testament exhibits an influence of the 
 Persian religion on the Jewish, but brings out at the same 
 time the difference between the two faiths. 1 Both sought to 
 account for certain forms of evil in the world by the intro- 
 duction of intermediate agencies in some sort independent 
 of the righteous and benevolent God. But in one the sense 
 of evil was so strong as to give birth to what was practically 
 an evil deity ; in the other the sense of the aloneness of God 
 was so deep as to keep the evil powers practically subordinate 
 to him. In both, the natural ethical feeling imposed limi- 
 tations on the influence assigned to the evil supernatural 
 agencies ; the conviction of man's moral independence gave 
 tone, in spite of all other theories, to the ethical-religious 
 life. This is evident in the prophets and Psalms, in the dis- 
 courses of Jesus and the Epistles ; it is only in the folk-stories 
 and apocalypses that evil spirits play a very important 
 part. It would be fruitless to ask what the Jewish demono- 
 logical development would have been without foreign influ- 
 ence. We can hardly doubt that the pre-exilian material 
 would have maintained itself and suffered the modifications 
 which growth of ethical feeling would render necessary. 
 
 1 Much uncertainty rests on the early history of the Mazdean religion. 
 The origins are discussed by Spiegel, " Eranische Alterthumskunde " (Leip- 
 zig, 1871-1878); Darmesteter, " Orrnazd et Ahriman " (Paris, 1877); "The 
 Zend Avesta," Parts I., II. (Oxford, 1880, 1883); De Harlez, "Des Origines 
 du Zoroastrisme " (Paris, 1879); "Avesta" (Paris, 1881); Mills, "The Zend 
 Avesta," Part III. (Oxford, 1887); Meyer, " Geschichte des Alterthums" 
 (Stuttgart, 1884); Geldner, article "Zend Avesta" in "Encycl. Brit.," and 
 others. The relation hetween the Persian and Jewish demonologies is treated 
 by Nicolas, "Des Doctrines Religieuses des Juifs" (Paris, 1860); Kohut, 
 " Angelologie, etc." (in Vol. IV. of the " Abhandlungen fur die Kunde des 
 Morgenlandes "), and De Harlez. It seems not rash to infer from the tradi- 
 tions and from the tone of the materials of the " Avesta " that the leading 
 ideas of Mazdeism were in existence as early as the fourth century before 
 the beginning of our era.
 
 CHAPTEE IV. 
 
 MAN. 
 
 ~\\ 7"E have now to inquire into the Jewish and Christian 
 ^ views of the moral-religious history of man, the con- 
 stitution of his nature, his attitude toward right and wrong 
 and toward God, and the means by which he is to attain 
 perfection. 
 
 1. The Old Testament idea of the constitution of man is 
 a perfectly simple and popular one, without scientific analy- 
 sis and distinctions, and without philosophical or theological 
 theories. Common observation teaches that man is a crea- 
 ture composed of a visible bodily frame informed by an 
 invisible something which is believed to be connected with 
 thought, feeling, will, with all that makes up life. Such is 
 the conception given in the second account of creation, Gen. 
 ii. 7: God "formed man of the dust of the ground and 
 breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and man became 
 a living soul ; " the same expression for the totality of human 
 being is found in Isa. x. 18. This duality of being is given 
 throughout the Old Testament, never demonstrated or com- 
 mented on, but always assumed as common opinion. In the 
 first account of creation, Gen. i. 26-28, it is not even men- 
 tioned ; man is created in the likeness of the Elohim-beings 
 (" our likeness "), and is invested with dominion over all the 
 earth, his constitution is taken for granted. 
 
 In the Old Testament, the term " body " means only the phy 
 sical mass of bones and flesh and blood ; it is never employed 
 in an ethical sense. Nor do we find such a sense given to 
 the word "flesh;" in Ezek. xi. 19, its physical peculiarity of
 
 174 CONSTITUTION OF MAN. 
 
 softness is used to denote figuratively tenderness and im- 
 pressibility of heart. It is sometimes identical with " body " : 
 "My heart is glad and my glory rejoices, my flesh also 
 dwells in security " (Ps. xvi. 9) ; or it is physically distin- 
 guished from the body, probably as part of it : " When thy 
 flesh and thy body are consumed" (Prov. v. 11) ; or it means 
 the human personality: "My flesh trembles for fear of thee" 
 (Ps. cxix. 120) ; and so in combination with " heart " : " My 
 heart and my flesh shout to the living God " (Ps. Ixxxiv. 2). 
 It is used also to express animal nature in contrast with 
 spiritual: "Their horses are flesh, and not spirit" (Isa. xxxi. 
 3) ; or human nature in contrast with divine conceived of as 
 pure spirit: "In God I have put my trust, I fear not what 
 flesh can do to me " (Ps. Ivi. 4), " The gods whose dwelling 
 is not with flesh" (Dan. ii. 11); and "all flesh" is an ex- 
 pression for all mankind: "0 thou that nearest prayer, 
 to thee shall all flesh come" (Ps. Ixv. 2). To flesh as the 
 characteristic of the human in distinction from the divine, 
 attaches the idea of weakness : " With him [the king of 
 Assyria] is an arm of flesh, but with us is Yahwe, our God " 
 (2 Chron. xxxii. 8) ; but no ethical element is involved. 
 Body and flesh were not Qonceived of as impure, for the 
 flesh 6f animals was used in sacrifices and regarded as holy. 
 They contained no inherent tendency to sin, though their 
 weakness and their association with the appetites might 
 cause them to be thought of as an occasion of temptation. 
 "Bone" is combined with "flesh" to express the whole phy- 
 sical structure in Gen. xxix. 14, 2 Sam. v. 1 ; and " bones " is 
 equivalent to " body " in Ps. vi. 2 (1). Blood, in accordance 
 with general observation, is everywhere regarded as the seat 
 of life (Gen. ix. 4; Lev. xvii. 11). 
 
 The soul, according to the Old Testament conception, is 
 primarily that breath which common observation shows to 
 be the universal and inseparable accompaniment of life with
 
 CONSTITUTION OF MAN. 175 
 
 all its functions. It is sometimes, therefore, simply the 
 animal life, as where Elijah stretches himself on the dead 
 child and prays that his soul may come into him again 
 (1 Kings xvii. 21) ; or where it is said of the king that 
 he saves the souls of the needy (Ps. Ixxii. 13) ; and such 
 probably is the representation in Gen. ii. 7. In this last 
 passage we have the more developed view of the soul as 
 the breath of God breathed into man ; in which, of course 
 we are not to see a pantheistic idea, but only the simple 
 belief that the life of man is the immediate creation of God, 
 a belief perhaps connected with the statement in the first 
 history of creation that man was made in the image of the 
 Elohim-beings. The word " soul," as synonymous with life, 
 naturally comes to mean " person," as in Lev. v. 1, Gen. xii. 
 5, Ezek. xiii. 19 ; and the expressions, "my soul," "thy soul," 
 " his soul," become equivalent to " myself," " thyself," " him- 
 self" (Gen. xii. 13; Job x. 1; Ps. Ivii 4; 1 Sam. ii. 16; Jer. 
 xxxviii. 17 ; Ps. Ixxxix. 48 ; Eccles. ii. 24 ; Mic. vi. 7 ; Isa. 
 liii. 10) ; and it may even be used for a dead body, inasmuch 
 as this suggested personality (Lev. xxi. 11). The more im- 
 portant ethical-religious sense of the word is to express the 
 whole inward nature, as in Deut. xiii. 3, Ps. Ixii. 5, and 
 many other passages. Whatever man feels, thinks, or wills, 
 is attributed to the soul. It is the organ of all spiritual- 
 religious thought ; it is the part of man which comes into 
 contact with God, which constitutes the essence of the per- 
 sonality. So completely does it include all human functions 
 that while it is said to be restored by the perfect law of God 
 (Ps. xix. 7), it also stands for the inward spirit which may 
 be discouraged in work (Num. xxi. 4), and for appetite : " As 
 when a hungry man dreams, and behold, he eats, but he 
 awakes and his soul is empty ; or as when a thirsty man 
 dreams, and behold, he drinks, but he awakes, and behold, he 
 is faint, and his soul has appetite " (Isa. xxix. 8).
 
 176 CONSTITUTION OF MAN. 
 
 The use of the word "spirit" in the Old Testament as 
 part of human nature is very nearly identical with that of 
 "soul." It signifies life, or the inward, invisible seat of 
 life : " Who knows the spirit of the sons of men, whether 
 it goes upward, and the spirit of the beast, whether it goes 
 downward to the earth?" (Eccles. iii. 21.) It is the intel- 
 lect: Daniel is said to have had an excellent spirit and 
 knowledge and understanding (Dan. v. 12); it is courage 
 (Josh. v. 1). It represents the whole inward nature: 
 Pharaoh's spirit was troubled by his dream (Gen. xli. 8) ; 
 Elisha asks that a double portion (the portion of an oldest 
 son) of Elijah's spirit (that is, of his whole inward power, 
 intellectual and religious) may rest on him (2 Kings ii. 9) ; 
 the Psalmist begs for a steadfast spirit, a nature wholly 
 attached to God (Ps. li. 10); and he that rules his spirit, 
 that is, himself, the totality of his inward powers, is said to 
 be better than he who takes a city (Prov. xvi. 2). It is 
 the seat of ethical-religious life : " Happy is the man to 
 whom Yahwe does not reckon iniquity, and in whose spirit 
 there is no guile;" "the sacrifices of God are a broken spirit: 
 a broken and a crushed heart, God, thou dost not despise " 
 (Ps. li. 17). 
 
 Nor is there any different statement to be made in respect 
 to the use of the word "heart," which signifies in the Old 
 Testament not especially the emotional nature, but the 
 whole inward being : " Hope deferred makes the heart sick " 
 (Prov. xiii. 12) ; " If I have purposed iniquity in my heart, 
 the Lord will not hear" (Ps. Ixvi. 18); and God is called 
 the "tryer of the hearts and reins " (Ps. vii. 10) ; and so the 
 term comes to signify the personality, as in Gen. viii. 21, 
 when Yahwe smells the sweet savor of Noah's sacrifice and 
 says " in his heart " that he will not again curse the ground, 
 and Ps. x. 6 : " He says in his heart, I shall not be moved," 
 that is, says to himself. The phrase " heart and flesh " also,
 
 CONSTITUTION OF MAN. 177 
 
 as is remarked above, is used to express the whole being 
 (Ps. Ixxiii. 26 ; Ixxxiv. 2) ; it is equivalent to " mind (or 
 soul) and body." 1 
 
 The New Testament has all the uses of these terms above 
 mentioned, and adds others which flowed naturally out of its 
 higher spiritual conception of human life and its sharper 
 antithesis between opposing elements. " Body " is the phy- 
 sical structure of flesh and bones (Matt. x. 28 ; 1 Cor. xii. 
 14), and so the natural physical life in this world, the taber- 
 nacle of the soul, the locus and vehicle of earthly activity 
 (2 Cor. v. 6, 10); and then by a natural transition it is em- 
 ployed by Paul to represent the unregenerate, sinful nature, 
 as opposed to the higher life of the spirit : " If by the spirit 
 you kill the deeds of the body, you shall live" (Eom. 
 viii. 13). 
 
 "Flesh" occurs in the simple physical sense (1 Pet. iv. 
 1), and then as equivalent to humanity, that is, human na- 
 ture : Christ was an Israelite "as concerning the flesh " (Eom. 
 ix. 5) ; the Word became flesh and dwelt in the world (John 
 i. 14), the combination "flesh and blood" having the same 
 sense (Matt. xvi. 17 ; Cal. i. 16) ; " all flesh " means the whole 
 human race (John xvii. 2, and the similar expression "no 
 flesh " in 1 Cor. i. 29). As the instrument of the appetites, 
 and distinguished by its grossness from the spirit, it is used 
 by Paul and his school to signify the animal life as the seat 
 
 1 "Reins" is similarly employed (Jer. xi. 20; Ps. Ixxiii. 21 ; and once in 
 the New Testament, Eev. ii. 23, the expression being quoted from the Old 
 Testament). The bowels are the seat of love and the desire, compassion, and 
 sorrow that spring from love (Song of Songs v. 4; Gen. xliii. 30; Jer. iv. 19; 
 Phil. ii. 1), or even (in the New Testament, 2 Cor. vi. 12) of the affections in 
 general; they are regarded also as the source whence life issues (Gen. xv. 4), 
 and so the loins (Gen. xxxv. 11; Heb. vii. 10). "Liver" (in Babylonian- 
 Assyrian equivalent to "heart") is used once (Lam. ii. 11) for the seat of 
 the inward life. It was the prominent organs of the trunk that the ancients 
 connected with life ; the word " brain " does not occur in the Old Testament ; 
 in Arabic, madmug, "struck on the brain," is "stupid." 
 
 12
 
 178 CONSTITUTION OF MAN. 
 
 of sin, the unregenerate nature : in Rom. viii., it is termed 
 "sinful," is contrasted with the spirit as the seat of the 
 higher life ; the mind of the flesh is said to be enmity against 
 God, and they who live after the flesh must die ; the " works 
 of the flesh," all sorts of wrong-doing, are detailed in Gal. v. 
 19-21; the spirit and the flesh are described as antagonists 
 one to the other (v. 17), and "they that are of Christ Jesus 
 have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires" (v. 
 24) ; all unbelievers live in the desires of the flesh and of 
 natural human thought (Eph. ii. 3; Col. ii. 11); Paul uses 
 the word also of an unspiritual religion, especially of the 
 Jewish reliance on the Law: "Did you receive the Spirit 
 by the works of the Law or by the hearing of faith ? Are 
 you so foolish ? Having begun in the spirit, are you now 
 perfected in the flesh?" (Gal. iii. 2, 3.) 
 
 "Heart" is the whole inward nature: the Evil One snatches 
 away the word of the kingdom, which has been sown in the 
 heart (Matt. xiii. 19) ; the Devil put into the heart of Judas 
 to betray Jesus (John xiii. 2) ; men, after their hardness and 
 impenitent heart treasure up for themselves wrath in the 
 day of wrath (Rom. ii. 5), and with the heart man believes 
 unto righteousness (Rom. x. 10), the act of believing involv- 
 ing all the powers of the mind, thought, feeling, and will. 
 
 " Soul " is equivalent to " life " in Matt. x. 39 : " He that 
 finds his soul shall lose it, and he that loses his soul for my 
 sake shall find it;" and Matt. xvi. 26 : "What is a man prof- 
 ited if he gain the whole world and forfeit his soul ? " and 
 to " person " in Rom. xiii. 1 : " Let every soul be in subjection 
 to the higher powers." It signifies the whole inward nature 
 in James i. 21 : the word is able to save men's souls ; and in 
 John xii. 27 : " Now is my soul troubled, and what shall I 
 say ? " 
 
 "Spirit" is the breath of the natural life (Luke viii. 55), 
 or a disembodied existence (Luke xxiv. 37-39). It represents
 
 CONSTITUTION OF MAN. 179 
 
 the inward nature in Mark viii. 12: "He sighed deeply in 
 his spirit " (or it may here mean the personality itself), and 
 1 Cor. v. 3 : " Absent in body but present in spirit ; " in the 
 eighth chapter of Eonians it is used frequently for the in- 
 ward spiritual life created by Christ and the Holy Spirit ; 
 the spirit and its mind are put over against the flesh and 
 its mind (vs. 4. 5, 6, 9, 10). 
 
 The New Testament uses the word " mind " (i>oO<?) in the 
 same general sense for the reflective faculty, or for the whole 
 inward being. It is the intellect in Luke xxiv. 45, where 
 Jesus opens the minds of the disciples to understand the 
 scriptures ; in 1 Cor. ii. 16, it signifies the thought-content of 
 the intellect : we, says the apostle, have the mind of Christ ; 
 that is, we have come into possession of his thought, which 
 is the expression of his complete comprehension of the divine 
 purpose. In the quotation from the Septuagint in the same 
 verse, the " mind " is the rendering of the Hebrew word for 
 " spirit," the two being here identical in meaning. Paul em- 
 ploys the term usually in a moral-religious sense for the rea- 
 son and will, tainted or untainted by sin. Thus in Eom. vii. 
 23, 25, it is the normal human judgment, which approves the 
 right, and the normal human will, which desires to obey it, 
 though both are overpowered by the " flesh," the corrupt na- 
 ture, in which dwells the love of evil : he delights in the law 
 of God, but there is another law in his nature warring against 
 this law of his " mind " and bringing him into captivity to 
 the law of sin. Elsewhere the mind is described as reprobate 
 (the heathen, Eom. i. 28), fleshly, that is, reason and will 
 controlled by the lower nature (Col. ii. 18), defiled (Tit. i 
 15, where it is combined with " conscience," as if the two 
 were practically identical). 
 
 It is evident from this survey that the terms " body" and 
 " flesh " are practically synonymous in both Testaments, and 
 the same thing is true of " heart," " soul," and " spirit." The
 
 180 CONSTITUTION OF MAN. 
 
 number of passages in the New Testament in which the ex- 
 pressions " soul and body," "spirit and body," " spirit and 
 flesh " are employed to denote the whole of human nature 
 shows that its constitution was conceived of as dual ; and 
 further it is evident that " spirit " and " soul " are used inter- 
 changeably, each as standing for the whole inward nature. 
 With this usage so clearly denned we can hardly accept the 
 supposition of a trichotomy of spirit, soul, and body in the 
 sense that the spirit forms a distinct essence from the soul. 
 It is true that Paul employs the terms " spirit " and " spirit- 
 ual " in a peculiar way to express the regenerate nature, the 
 soul of man after a new life has been breathed into it by the 
 divine spirit. It is a distinction which seems to be confined 
 in the New Testament to him and his school. His choice of 
 the word " spirit " to express the higher life which was in- 
 formed by Christ may have been suggested by his conception 
 of its relation to the divine spirit ; it is possible, however, 
 that some distinction between the terms " spirit " and " soul," 
 though not one of essence, had already sprung up and was 
 adopted and applied by him in this peculiar way. 1 The dis- 
 tinction in his mind is brought out in 1 Cor. xv. 44, 45 : " It 
 is sown a psychical body, it is raised a pneumatical body ; if 
 there is a psychical body, there is also a pneumatical ; so also 
 it is written, the first man Adam became a living soul 
 [psyche], the last Adam a life-giving spirit [pneuma]." The 
 psychical body is that wherein dwells the natural, unregener- 
 ate soul ; the pneumatical body is that which is prepared to 
 be the dwelling of the regenerated soul, the spirit which 
 has been touched by the hand of God. The difference between 
 Adam and Christ is that the former was created as a soul 
 endowed with life, the latter was a spirit capable of giving 
 life. The distinction of soul and spirit is not one between 
 
 1 On the use of these and the related terms in the Septuagint and by 
 Philo, see E. Hatch, " Essays in Biblical Greek " (Oxford, 1889), Essay III.
 
 CONSTITUTION OF MAN. 181 
 
 different parts of human nature : Adam's soul was capable of 
 becoming spirit ; Christ's soul was spirit. It is a moral- 
 religious, not a substantive distinction that the apostle has in 
 mind. The same distinction is found in 1 Cor. xiv. 15: " The 
 psychical man does not receive the things of the Spirit of 
 God, for they are foolishness to him ; and he cannot know 
 them because they are pneumatically judged, but the pneu- 
 matical man judges all things." He has been speaking of the 
 wisdom of the Gospel as contrasted with human science and 
 philosophy, declaring that the knowledge of the truth of God 
 comes to believers not by their own reflection, but by revela- 
 tion of the divine spirit, and he then adds the words quoted 
 above; it is evident that he uses "psychical" in the sense of 
 unbelieving or unregenerate, and " prieumatical " in the oppo- 
 site sense. The one phase passes into the other through the 
 influence of the spirit of God ; a transformation is effected in 
 human nature, but there is no change of essence. 
 
 When, therefore, we find the nature of man described as 
 "spirit and soul and body" (I Thess. v. 23), the natural un- 
 derstanding is that the distinction between the two first ele- 
 ments is religious-rhetorical and not one of essence ; the 
 soul is first thought of as the seat of the inward life, and then 
 the word " spirit " is added, not as an independent compo- 
 nent of human nature, but as expressing clearly that trans- 
 formed state of the soul in which it comes into the higher 
 relation with God through faith in Jesus Christ. It might 
 seem, however, that a substantive distinction between the 
 two is expressed in Heb. iv. 12 : " The word of God is liv- 
 ing and active and sharper than any two-edged sword, and 
 piercing even to the dividing of soul and spirit, of both joints 
 and marrow, and a discerner of the thoughts and intents of 
 the heart." But it is to be observed that this passage is 
 rhetorical in its tone, and is therefore not to be interpreted 
 in a strictly scientific way. It is easily supposable that the
 
 182 CONSTITUTION OF MAN. 
 
 writer had in mind the idea of Paul, whose theology he so 
 largely adopts, and thought of the soul and spirit as different 
 phases and states of mind ; from this point of view, he would 
 naturally speak of a division made by the divine word of the 
 Gospel between the natural, unregeuerate life and thought 
 and that higher perception and feeling which arise from the 
 transforming power of God. Since these two passages admit 
 of a natural explanation on the basis of a dual conception of 
 human nature, it is hardly safe to deduce a trichotomy from 
 them against all other New Testament usage. 
 
 This is, however, a point of secondary importance in the 
 statement of Christian doctrine. "What is essential and 
 characteristic in the Christian view is the idea of a new 
 perceptive power in man, the development of his nature 
 into a capacity for comprehension of God and fellowship 
 with him. This idea has its roots in the Old Testament, 
 but receives its perfect shape only in the Christian literature 
 of the first century. The completer organization of the 
 inward nature flowed naturally from the strict Pauline 
 Christian conception of divine truth -and man's individual 
 independence. Not only, it was held, had God revealed 
 himself in a peculiarly definite manner in the person of 
 his Son, but, in contrast with the national coloring of the 
 Jewish faith, the divine spirit informed and communed 
 with each believer's soul and impressed on each its own 
 personality (Gal. iii. 3 ; 1 Cor. iii. 16 ; Rorn. viii. 2) This 
 intimate association between the human soul and the divine 
 demanded in the former an instrument fit to receive the 
 influence of the latter. 1 
 
 1 The immediately preceding Jewish literature offers little material for 
 tracing the history of this conception. A divine influence on the mind is 
 fully affirmed in Wisdom viii., but nothing is said distinctly of a higher faculty 
 of the soul. The classic writers of the Augustan period entploy "spirit" in 
 the senses of " life, soul, courage ; " the New Testament writers think of a 
 mental power that apprehends divine things.
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 183 
 
 2. The question of the constitution of man's nature may 
 be said to be chiefly a scientific and non-moral one ; the 
 principle of the division of human nature into its parts is 
 not in itself ethical. The more important inquiry is, what 
 is man's natural moral condition, his attitude toward right, 
 his capacity for right-doing ? What is the Jewish conception 
 of sin ? 
 
 That wrong-doing is natural and universal is matter of 
 common observation, an opinion that has doubtless been 
 held among all communities of men with greater or less 
 distinctness. Wherever a standard of right exists (and we 
 may assume that it exists among all men, even in the most 
 undeveloped societies), deviations from it must occur and 
 be known ; and these deviations constitute sin. In them- 
 selves, considered as violations of human rule, they are only 
 ethical wrongs ; but inasmuch as the deity is identified with 
 the ethical ideal of the community arid becomes the judge 
 of right and wrong, moral offences are considered to be 
 committed against him, and in this character are termed 
 sinful. The offences are at first of the simplest sort, viola- 
 tion of customs among men, or of ritual duties toward God. 
 The progress of ethical thought involves a corresponding 
 progress in the conception of sin. Duties are more clearly 
 defined, the higher qualities of the soul sympathy, love, 
 self-sacrifice, inwardness become more and more prominent, 
 and their absence is more distinctly noted as a lack, an 
 offence against the command of God. The conception of 
 the divine perfectness goes hand and hand with that of 
 human goodness. The purer and more spiritual the idea 
 of God, the deeper the sense of the violation of his will, 
 which is one with man's highest conception of right. 
 
 The two elements in the content of the feeling of sin 
 are, first, the ethical standard, and secondly, inwardness or 
 spiritualness ; that is, the feeling of the necessity of purity
 
 184 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS: 
 
 of soul, of the elevation and renewal of the inward nature 
 so that it shall be in complete sympathy and harmony with 
 the good, and with God as the ideal and source of the good. 
 Jewish thought of the period after Ezra shows a great ad- 
 vance in this direction. The time of the Judges and of 
 David is one of moral rawness : the ethical standard is low ; 
 the rules of right conduct are outward and mechanical; and 
 of a sense of sin, in the higher meaning of the expression, 
 there is no trace. 1 The prophetic writings, from the eighth 
 century on, are ethically strict and high, except that they 
 do not recognize claims of foreigners, but confine the circle 
 of their moral obligations to Israel, and that little promi- 
 nence is given to the inward life ; the rebuke of the prophets 
 is directed against idolatry, neglect of Yahwe, drunkenness, 
 the oppression of the poor by the rich, and other external 
 sins. Their point of view is national ; they look on the 
 individual almost exclusively as a member of the nation, 
 and are roused to anger by those offences which violate the 
 compact between God and the people, deprive them of his 
 favor and protection, and retard their progress toward the 
 condition of complete, blessed prosperity. A turning-point 
 is marked by the Deuteronomist, Jeremiah, and Ezekiel, 
 who announce the principles of individual responsibility and 
 inwardness of obedience. The incompleteness of the notion 
 of sin which had prevailed up to this time is exhibited in 
 the principle of solidarity which so largely controlled men's 
 moral ideas : children's teeth were set on edge because their 
 fathers had eaten sour grapes ; Achan's family was involved 
 in the punishment of his sin (Josh. vii. 24, 25); and the 
 Decalogue declares that Yahwe is a jealous God, visiting 
 
 1 The episode given in 2 Sam. xii. 1-14, the rebuke of Nathan and 
 David's repentance, is so out of keeping with the tone of the context that 
 it must be put into the same category with 2 Sam. vii., and regarded as a 
 production not of David's time, but of a later, perhaps the Deuteronomic 
 period.
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 185 
 
 the iniquity of the fathers upon the children and on the 
 third and fourth generation of them that hate him (Deut. v. 
 9). And this theory of punishment was held not in the 
 modern form, according to which children hy the operation 
 of natural law inherit the consequences of the sins of an- 
 cestors, but in a mechanical way which represented God in 
 his capacity of judge as arbitrarily punishing the descend- 
 ants of evil-doers. It was the survival of a primitive con- 
 ception of society in which the unit was the tribe or the 
 family; 1 it was banished by the better development of the 
 moral sense which recognized the rights and responsibilities 
 of the individual (Ezek. xviii. 2-4). In the same way, the ex- 
 ternal and mechanical conception of obedience and sin which 
 belonged to the national point of view disappeared before the 
 rise of a higher estimation of the individual soul. It was 
 just before the destruction of Jerusalem by the Chaldeans 
 that this purer conception found expression in Israelitish 
 literature ; from which we may infer that the ethical pro- 
 gress since David's time had been continuous, in spite of 
 the religious oscillations and defections described in the 
 book of Kings, whose narrative, it must be remembered, 
 reflects the ideas of the exile rather than the exact his- 
 torical course of events. The national conception continued 
 to exist for a long time, but the new ideals had effected 
 an entrance into Jewish life and held their place. 
 
 The principal ethical fact in the post-exilian period is the 
 introduction of the complete Levitical legislation. In Pales- 
 
 1 As all the members of a family or clan were held to he literally of the 
 same blood, the principle of solidarity was logically conceived in a thorough- 
 going literal sense ; from this point of view it was natural that all the tribes- 
 men should share the fortunes of a brother, and especially of a chief. This 
 idea survived in religion after it had vanished from the legal codes ; an exilian 
 or post-exilian editor represents the whole Israelitish nation as suffering for 
 the sin of its king (2 Sam. xxiv.), and in certain systems of Christian theology 
 the human race is involved in the condemnation of the first man..
 
 186 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 tine the interval between the return from Babylon and the 
 advent of Ezra and Nehemiah was almost entirely color- 
 less, so far as our information goes, in regard to the progress 
 of morals and religion. The Jews in Palestine were ab- 
 sorbed in other things, struggling for bread, lacking in high 
 literary and religious stimulus ; the flower of the nation was 
 in Babylonia, and Palestine was in a state of comparative 
 stagnation. No doubt there was some progress ; but there 
 is little or no sign of it. With Ezra and Nehemiah came 
 a new impulse. It might seem doubtful, however, whether 
 the introduction of the finished Law was an unmixed good 
 from the ethical point of view. The code was largely ritual- 
 istic; it fixed men's minds on ceremonial details which it 
 in some cases put into the same category and on the same 
 level with moral duties. Would there not thence result 
 a dimming of the moral sense, and a confusion of moral 
 distinctions ? The ethical attitude of a man who could re- 
 gard a failure in the routine of sacrifice as not less blame- 
 worthy than an act of theft cannot be called a lofty one. 
 If such had been the general effect of the ritual law, we 
 should have to pronounce it an evil. But in point of fact, 
 the result was different. What may be called the natural 
 debasing tendency of a ritual was counteracted by other 
 influences, by the ethical elements of the law itself, and by 
 the general moral progress of the community. The great 
 legal schools which grew up in the second century, if we 
 may judge by the sayings of the teachers which have come 
 down to us, did not fail to discriminate between the out- 
 ward and the inward, the ceremonial and the moral ; and 
 the conception of sin corresponded to the idea of the ethical 
 standard. 
 
 It is in the book of Psalms that we find the fullest picture 
 of the inward religious experiences of this period from the 
 exile on. We are not, indeed, to understand every expres-
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 187 
 
 sion of suffering and every cry for help in the Psalter as an 
 indication of a sense of sin. Nor can we always say cer- 
 tainly what that iniquity is which a psalmist imputes to 
 himself. The author of Psalm xxxi. regards his misfortunes 
 apparently as the result of his sin : " My life is consumed 
 with sorrow and my years with sighing ; my strength fails 
 because of my iniquity ; and my bones are wasted' away " 
 (v. 10) ; but at the same time, he can declare that he has 
 trusted in God (v. 14), that he hates those who regard lying 
 vanities (v. 6), and that he belongs in the category of the 
 righteous (v. 18). The same seeming contradiction occurs 
 in Ps. xxxviii. 3, 20, and Ps. Ixix. 6, 8, 14 ; the psalmist ac- 
 knowledges his sin, yet claims to follow what is good. In 
 Ps. xxv. 7, the " sins of youth " are apparently half-uncon- 
 scious, urimalignant offences, perhaps opposed to the more 
 conscious and definite " transgressions." In some cases the 
 external, national point of view is obvious, as in Ixxxv. 1, 2 : 
 "Thou wast favorable to thy land, didst bring back the 
 captivity of Jacob, didst forget the iniquity of thy people." 
 Yet with all these elements of doubt, it is hard to resist 
 the impression that we have in some of the Psalms a true 
 spiritual conception of sin as an impurity of soul which 
 makes a barrier between it and God. In Psalm li. we have 
 a complete combination and fusion of the religious and 
 ethical sides of the consciousness of sin : the writer, in 
 his overwhelming sense of the divine presence and purity, 
 isolates himself from his human surroundings and looks 
 to God as the sole being concerned with his sin : " Against 
 thee, thee only have I sinned, and done that which is evil 
 in thine eyes, that thou rnightest be justified when thou 
 speakest and be clear when thou judgest. . . . Hide thy face 
 from my sins and blot out all my iniquities " (vs. 4, 9) ; 1 at 
 
 1 That is, his feeling is not that he is absolutely innocent with respect to 
 men, but that he is blameworthy with respect to God, such is the suggestion 
 of the context.
 
 188 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 the same time, he longs for purity and inward truth as the 
 result of banishment of sin; he desires to be whiter than 
 snow when his heart shall have been made clean (vs. 2, 6, 7). 
 The psalm is apparently a cry out of the time of the exile 
 (or perhaps later), laden with the sense of suffering of that 
 period; yet the writer, though he may speak as a member 
 of the downcast nation, has nevertheless an individual sense 
 of sin, is persuaded that his own affliction has its roots in 
 his deep-seated transgression ; he is so profoundly conscious 
 of his moral weakness and his shortcomings before God that 
 he turns from the outward fact of suffering to fix his atten- 
 tion exclusively on the impurity of his own heart. This 
 humble consciousness of imperfection he declares to be the 
 best sacrifice that can be offered to God (v. 17); but this 
 fact does not diminish the reality of his sense of personal 
 sin. The sentiment of Psalm xxxii. is less clear : " I ac- 
 knowledge my sin to thee, and cover not my iniquity; I 
 said, I will confess my transgressions to Yah we, and thou 
 tookest away the guilt of my sin " (v. 5). It is the physical 
 suffering which follows sin that the psalmist seems to be 
 thinking of (v. 6), in reference to which he says : " Happy is 
 he whose transgression is forgiven, whose sin is covered ; 
 happy the man to whom Yahwe does not reckon iniquity" 
 (v. 1), happy because he escapes the consequences of sin; 
 but the ethical side is present in his mind, for he describes 
 this happy man as one in whose spirit there is no guile 
 (v.l). ' 
 
 By the side of this consciousness of sin in the Psalms, 
 there is, curiously enough, a pronounced consciousness of 
 righteousness. " Continue thy loving kindness to them that 
 know thee, and thy righteousness to the upright in heart ; let 
 not the foot of pride come upon me," says a writer who 
 evidently regards himself as upright in heart (xxxvi. 10). 
 Another psalmist, assailed by mighty enemies, declares that
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 189 
 
 it is for no sin or transgression of his (lix. 3). The author 
 of Psalm xviii. formulates this view very distinctly : "Yah we 
 dealt with me according to my righteousness, according to 
 the purity of my hands he recompensed me ; because I kept 
 the ways of Yahwe and did not wickedly depart from my 
 God, for all his ordinances were before me, and his statutes 
 I did not put away from me ; and I was perfect with him, 
 and kept myself from iniquity ; and Yahwe recompensed me 
 according to my righteousness, according to the purity of my 
 hands in his eyesight" (vs. 2024). This seems to be an 
 extraordinary assumption of moral perfectness, hard to recon- 
 cile with any true sense of sin. The difficulty seems to be 
 increased when the writer proceeds to formulate a general 
 theory respecting God's relations and dealings with men : 
 " With the merciful thou showest thyself merciful, with the 
 perfect, perfect, with the pure, pure, and with the wayward, 
 wayward" (vs. 25, 26). It is a natural conception that God's 
 attitude toward man should be determined by man's moral 
 character ; but this complete assimilation of the divine and 
 human attributes, unless it be a poetical exaggeration, seems 
 to be based on a somewhat mechanical conception of the 
 relation between God and man. But the explanation is 
 given in the next verse: ''Thou savest lowly people, and 
 haughty eyes thou dost abase" (v. 27). It is the nation 
 Israel that the writer has in mind ; it is of it and of himself 
 as belonging to it that he affirms righteousness. Similarly 
 in Psalm xliv. 17, 18: "All this is come upon us, yet we 
 have not forgotten thee nor been disloyal to thy covenant ; 
 our heart has not turned back, nor have our steps swerved 
 from thy way." This explanation, however, brings us face 
 to face with the fact of a national consciousness of innocence. 
 The Forty-Fourth Psalm belongs to the latter part of the 
 Greek period, a time when national feeling was at its height. 
 Syrian oppression had intensified the national sense of reli-
 
 190 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 gious isolation and superiority in contrast with the heathen 
 cults ; the temple-worship assumed especial prominence and 
 importance ; the chief duty and mission of the nation seemed 
 to be the maintenance of the worship of the God of Israel 
 according to his ordinances, in the face of and as a protest 
 against heathen beliefs and ceremonies. From this point of 
 view, it was easy to feel that so long as the temple-ritual 
 was observed with precision and sincerity, the people might 
 justly claim to be righteous in the sight of God and to de- 
 serve his protection and blessing. Such a national sense of 
 innocence might also become individual; any man, especially 
 if he stood in close connection with the temple, might hold 
 himself, as a part of this exemplary nation, to merit the 
 divine favor. In such cases there may have been also the 
 sense of individual shortcomings, but it would without great 
 difficulty be swallowed up in the conviction of national 
 innocence. 
 
 We have thus two especially prominent aspects of the 
 Jewish consciousness of sin. There was, doubtless, a third, 
 a superficial, indistinct sense of wrong-doing, which did not 
 greatly afflict the soul or color the life. The psalmists repre- 
 sent the intenser, more exalted feeling of the nation; the 
 masses . of the people were comparatively indifferent, if we 
 may judge from our general knowledge of human nature 
 and from hints in the Old Testament. But it is with the 
 higher and better-formulated feeling that we are here con- 
 cerned. What was the advanced Jewish view respecting 
 the nature of sin and its relation to man's inward being? 
 The literature offers no complete answer to this question. 
 Sin is taken for granted. In the earlier prophetic writings 
 it is regarded as a habit, or as a mass of actions. Even 
 Ezekiel's " new heart " (Ezek. xxxvi. 26) is concerned chiefly 
 with external things : " I will give you a new heart, and put 
 a new spirit within you ; I will take away the stony heart
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 191 
 
 out of your flesh and give you a heart of flesh; and I will 
 put my spirit within you and cause you to walk in my 
 statutes, and you shall keep my ordinances and do them; 
 and you shall dwell in the land that I gave to your fathers, 
 and you shall be my people, and I will be your God " (vs. 
 26-28). It is again to the Psalter that we must come for 
 the deeper conception of sin. But even here we have no 
 detailed explanation or distinct theory. "I was shapen in 
 iniquity, born in sin," says the author of the Fifty-First 
 Psalm (v. 5) ; this is the consciousness of a tendency to 
 wrong-doing from the beginning of life, and in so far implies 
 a weakness, a moral taint in human nature. Such is also 
 the conception in Jer. xvii. 9 : " The heart is deceitful 
 above all things, and it is desperately sick ; who can know 
 it ? : ' And yet, in spite of the universality of the expression, 
 the prophet seems not to have meant to affirm a total de- 
 pravity incapable in itself of doing right, for he adds imme- 
 diately (v. 10): "I, Yah we, search the heart, try the reins, 
 to give every man according to his ways, according to the 
 fruit of his doings." The possibility of right-doing and of 
 consequent reward from God is here assumed. This pre- 
 supposition that man is capable of achieving righteousness, 
 of attaining perfectness, runs throughout the Old Testament ; 
 human nature is portrayed as weak, as inclined to evil, but 
 not as morally impotent. Ezekiel, in his great appeal to 
 Israel to return to God and to righteousness (ch. xviii.), as- 
 sumes the ability of the sinner to put away his sin : " If 
 the wicked turn from all the sins he has committed, and 
 keep all my statutes, and do that which is lawful and right, 
 he shall surely live, he shall not die ; none of his transgres- 
 sions that he has committed shall be remembered against 
 him. In his righteousness that he has done, he shall live " 
 (vs. 21, 22). There is no mention of special divine help 
 here ; it is assumed that the man by his own inward power
 
 192 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 changes his moral status in the sight of God. Such is the 
 prevailing view in the Old Testament : sin is universal, but 
 not uncontrollable. Even in the greater part of the Psalter, 
 the root of man's righteousness is in his own heart ; and the 
 same thing is true of the reflective literature, Job, Proverbs, 
 Ecclesiastes. The exception is found in the Fifty-First Psalm. 
 It is the utterance of a man who felt that sin was ingrained in 
 his inner nature, that God, who desired truth in the inward 
 parts, must make him to know wisdom, that he had need of 
 a clean heart and a steadfast spirit, and that the condition of 
 his true life was the presence within him of that holy spirit 
 which God only could bestow. There is still no distinct 
 affirmation in this psalm of a total depravity of the soul. 
 There is a deep sense of inward corruption and of depen- 
 dence on God for righteousness, which might logically lead 
 to the position that man is incapable of achieving a right- 
 eousness of his own ; but we cannot assume complete logi- 
 calness in emotional religious thought, nor suppose that this 
 psalmist meant to announce a general theory. He stands 
 alone in the Old Testament in his conception of the sinful- 
 ness of human nature; no prophet and no other psalmist 
 has expressed this spiritual view of the inward religious life. 
 We must here recognize a progress in the Jewish idea of 
 sin ; the Fifty -First Psalm contains the germ of the New Testa- 
 ment teaching. But the psalmist appears to have been in 
 advance of the thought of his age. The conception of sin in 
 the later Jewish books such as Ecclesiastes, the Wisdom of 
 Solomon, Ecclesiasticus, Tobit, Daniel, Enoch, the Sibylline 
 Oracles, Maccabees is the old one, which may be called, by 
 comparison, external, 1 and this view is found also in the New 
 
 1 Ecclesiastes disapproves of sin as irrational (viii. 12 ; x. 3) ; Wisdom con- 
 templates the violence of the wicked (ii.) and the wrong-doing condemned in 
 Ecclesiasticus {passim) is of the outward sort; Tobit and Daniel are mainly 
 national, or, when individual, ritualistic (Tob.i. 10; Dan. i. 8) ; Enoch and 
 the following books also deal with sins against the national law and well-
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 193 
 
 Testament; for example, in the Epistle of James, though here 
 it is somewhat modified by Christian teaching. We must, 
 therefore, regard the Old Testament as teaching not that sin 
 is a nature, but that it is a tendency. It is described as a 
 weakness, a failure, a violent outbreak, a perverseness, or as 
 blindness and folly. It is a disposition or inclination which 
 constantly impels or allures men to wrong-doing ; it is not 
 an utter incapacity to do right. It is an enemy ever present, 
 watchful, alert, but not invincible ; it can be overcome by 
 man's own effort. Such was the teaching of common expe- 
 rience. But deeper natures, like the author of Psalm li., 
 felt that this perpetual conflict with temptation was unsatis- 
 factory, and that what man needed was freedom from evil 
 inclination, a heart in harmony with the right. This was 
 the view of the minority ; the mass of the people was con- 
 trolled by the nomistic idea ; sin was conceived of as the in- 
 fringement of particular laws, and was avoided by obedience 
 in details. 
 
 A careful analysis of the nature of sin would naturally be 
 attended, one would suppose, by an inquiry as to its origin. 
 But on this point the greater part of the Old Testament is 
 profoundly silent. National sin is assumed by the prophets 
 to have existed from the beginning, and no attempt is made 
 to account for its introduction ; the necessity for an explana- 
 tion of so common a fact was not felt by the practical Jew- 
 ish mind. The traditions of the forefathers preserved in the 
 Pentateuch tell of wrong-doing in Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, 
 but assume it as natural, and show no curiosity as to the 
 
 being. It must, however, be borne in mind that these works, by their subject- 
 matter and aims, would naturally dwell on the outward manifestations of evil, 
 nnd may have known deeper inward experiences than they express. Further, 
 the existence of different tendencies and modes of thought in different circles 
 must be recognized ; the Psalms probably represent the more spiritual thought 
 of the nation ; wisdom-books and apocalypses were more interested in other 
 things. 
 
 13
 
 194 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 source of the wrong disposition. Abram and Isaac are guilty 
 of prevarication which amounts to falsehood (Gen. xii. 13 ; 
 xxvi. 7) ; Jacob and Rebekah deceive the dim-eyed old Isaac 
 (Gen. xxvii.) ; and Jacob deals fraudulently with his father- 
 in-law (Gen. xxx.), the stories are told with perfect sim- 
 plicity ; no explanation is felt by the writer to be needed, 
 and none is given. 
 
 There is, however, one passage which appears to offer a 
 history of the origin of human sin ; it is the latter half of 
 the second history of creation (Gen. iii.). The date of this 
 passage is doubtful. It occurs in the body of traditions 
 (Gen. i.-xi.), which are sharply distinguished in content and 
 tone from the remainder of the book of Genesis. They con- 
 tain material identical with what we know existed in Baby- 
 lonia and Assyria, notably the history of the flood. Perhaps 
 the most natural account of the flood-story in Genesis is that 
 it was borrowed from the Assyrians or Babylonians, during 
 or shortly before the exile ; on the hypothesis that it was 
 brought by the Hebrews with them from the Tigris-Euphrates 
 valley when they migrated to Canaan, it would be hard to 
 account for the close similarity between the Chaldean and 
 biblical flood-stories (supposing that the Hebrew account 
 was not committed to writing till many centuries later), 
 since in each nation the tradition would go its independent 
 way, and the two would presumably diverge considerably 
 from each other ; and it would be equally hard to explain 
 the absence of all allusion to the great catastrophe in the 
 pre-exilian literature. 1 In the Assyrian-Babylonian remains 
 
 1 There are traces of different recensions in the Babylonian-Assyrian ac- 
 count, as in the Hebrew. Our Yahwistic and Elohistic components may rep- 
 resent narratives derived from different districts in Babylonia, or the latter 
 may be in part or wholly a later Jewish redaction of the material. The in- 
 terval of a hundred and fifty years between the arrival of the exiles in Baby- 
 lonia and the final redaction of the Pentateuch would allow a considerable 
 re-working of the story. The question, however, is not clear ; and it is pos-
 
 SIN AND. RIGHTEOUSNESS. 195 
 
 there are fragments of other narratives which are parallel 
 with parts of the material in Gen. i.-xi. ; for example, with the 
 cosmogony and the story of the Tower of Babel. It is pos- 
 sible that in the serpent of Gen. iii. we have a survival of 
 the dragon of Babylonian myth, who is the antagonist of the 
 gods, here transformed under the influence of the Jewish 
 monotheistic faith, and woven into the general body of Jew- 
 ish beliefs. No distinct reference to the story is found else- 
 where in the Old Testament ; l the earliest mention of the 
 beginning of death is found in the Wisdom of- Solomon 
 (ii. 24). These indications point to a late date for the present 
 form of the story in Genesis ; and it may be added that the 
 broad cosmopolitan view of history which it involves belongs 
 more naturally to the time when the Jews came into con- 
 tact with other nations. 
 
 But though the story of the temptation of man by the serpent 
 stands thus isolated in the Old Testament, it nevertheless ex- 
 ists, and was, as we know, accepted by and influential in the 
 later generations of Jewish thinkers. What is its design and 
 significance ? The first human pair have their abode in a de- 
 lightful land which produces no thorns or thistles, where the 
 beasts are obedient to man, and where human labor is only 
 
 sible that the Hebrews brought these stories with them from Chaldea at a 
 very early period. 
 
 1 Ezekiel, who shows elsewhere traces of Babylonian influence, has (xxviii.) 
 a description of the Garden of Eden, in which the king of Tyre, the anointed 
 cherub, dwelt till he sinned : " Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day 
 that thou wast created till unrighteousness was found in thee" (v. 15). It 
 is an allusion to the story of Adam, but nothing is said of the nature and 
 origin of the sin there committed (in v. 16 he has in mind the commercial 
 city). The prophet treats his material poetically, but his imagery shows that 
 he was acquainted with the outline of the history in Gen. ii. iii. His diver- 
 gencies in details from the Genesis narrative, and his introduction of the 
 Babylonian sacred mountain of the gods (v. 14) seem to point to a time 
 when the story had not yet taken shape among the Jews ; and this fact would 
 favor the view that the material was borrowed by them during the exile, and 
 so either was not a part of their original folk-lore, or, if formerly known to 
 them, was now taken afresh from their neighbors.
 
 196 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 a pleasant activity. There is a tree of life, by eating the 
 fruit of which man would become immortal. One moral 
 test is ordained for him : he is forbidden to eat of the fruit 
 of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, and death is to 
 be the penalty of disobedience. The animals are all endowed 
 with power of speech, and of them the serpent is the subtlest. 
 For some reason not explained in the text (according to the 
 Wisdom of Solomon, it was his envy of man's happiness and 
 possible immortality) he suggested to the woman that she 
 and the man should eat of the forbidden fruit, offering the 
 inducement that they should thus be made equal to the 
 Elohim-beings. They ate, and sentence of death was pro- 
 nounced on them ; and lest they should eat of the tree of life 
 and live forever, God drove them out of Eden, at the gate of 
 which he placed the cherubim to guard the approach to the 
 tree. What was the effect, in the conception of the writer 
 of this chapter, of man's act of disobedience ? Was it the 
 corruption of his moral nature, the entrance of sin as a 
 power into the world ? On the one hand, the transgression 
 of the divine command was an act of sin, the first, as far as 
 Jewish records go, in the history of the race. On the other 
 hand, the succeeding history in Genesis makes no refer- 
 ence to this event, and shows no consciousness of a dogma 
 of universal and total depravity. The priestly document 
 (L v., and parts of vi.-ix.) seems to ignore the story entirely ; 
 see, for example, in ch. v. the continuous development from 
 Adam to Noah (v. 29 is an insertion from another source). 
 And in the prophetic narrative, Abel and Noah are righteous 
 men accepted by God and apparently without taint of sin. 
 In both narratives, indeed, the earth is described as having 
 after a time become corrupt before God, but this fact is not 
 brought into connection with the narrative in the third 
 chapter; it seems rather to be the common Old Testament 
 view of the universality of sin, which is the result of expe-
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 197 
 
 rience. Moreover, it must be observed that in this chapter 
 the stress is laid on certain phenomena of life, which are 
 explained by the punishments inflicted : the serpent is to go 
 on his belly, eat dust, and be worsted in his conflict with 
 man ; the man and the woman are driven from a delightful 
 abode ; the earth is to bring forth inedible and hurtful 
 things ; the woman is to be subject to great bodily suffering, 
 and is to be subordinated to the man ; the man is to gain 
 his bread by the sweat of his brow and to return to the dust 
 out of which he was made. The main object of the writer 
 seems to be to account for the existence of these great facts 
 of man's experience, birth, toil, death ; and he appends an 
 account of the origin of clothing (v. 2 1). 1 Of effect on man's 
 inward life he says nothing; he is apparently concerned only 
 with some outward facts. These facts he brings into con- 
 nection with the initial act of human disobedience to God, 
 and iii so far his narrative may be regarded as a history of 
 the origin of sin. But he, like the other Old Testament 
 writers, really takes the human inclination to sin for granted. 
 He does not undertake to explain by what inward process 
 tho woman came to accept the serpent's suggestion, or why 
 the man decided to follow the woman's example. There is 
 no hint of inward conflict either in the woman or in the man ; 
 and it is not true, as is so often said, that Adam and his wife 
 are represented as in a state of childlike moral weakness or 
 ignorance. It was only by eating the forbidden fruit, in- 
 
 1 The awakening of the consciousness of nakedness may be looked on as 
 the birth of shame, the natural accompaniment of the sense of sin ; this would 
 be a fine psychological touch in the narrative. But it is doubtful whether the 
 writer had in mind anything more than the unseemliness which every tolera- 
 bly advanced civilization attaches to nakedness. The first pair, as a result 
 of the knowledge acquired by eating of the fruit of the tree, perceived, he 
 would say, the indecency of their position ; whence this sense of indecency 
 comes, he does not say ; and we may suppose that our author attempted in 
 thought no precise explanation of its origin, but contented himself with re- 
 garding it, like toil, as a part of the heritage of civilized life.
 
 198 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 deed, that they attained that high perception of good and 
 evil, that fine power of distinguishing and selecting, which 
 equalled them with the Elohim-beings (v. 22); but before 
 this they had been intrusted with the care of the garden, 
 and are represented as human beings of normal intelligence 
 and development. Morally, also, they appear to occupy the 
 normal position of man. Up to the fatal moment of the 
 woman's colloquy with the serpent, they had not sinned ; but 
 this was because no occasion of transgression had presented 
 itself ; at any moment it was possible for them to choose the 
 wrong rather than the right. In a word, the question of the 
 origin of sin was remote from the writer's mind ; he chron- 
 icled the first act of sin, but it did not occur to him that any 
 psychological explanation of such an occurrence was needed. 
 It was matter of common experience that there was in the 
 human soul an inclination to evil ; and in this respect he did 
 not think of the first man as different from his posterity. 1 
 A sharp temptation presents itself to Adam and Eve, there 
 is the prize of equality with the divine beings to be gained by 
 one act of disobedience ; they chose to risk the consequences 
 of disobedience. Many questions of psychological interest 
 present themselves to the modern reader of this story ; but it 
 is not probable that any of these were in the mind of its 
 author. Did he regard the godlike knowledge of good and 
 evil as a misfortune, and the desire for it as a crime ? How 
 could man incur the penalty of death at the moment that he 
 became as one of the Elohim ? Is labor, like knowledge, to 
 be regarded as an evil? But these questions have really 
 nothing to do with the story. For the explanation of its 
 present form we have probably to go first to the old mythical 
 narrative of which it is the monotheistic elaboration, 2 and 
 
 1 For a similar rabbinical view see Weber, "System der pal. Theol." 
 p. 206. 
 
 2 The naivete of the narrative points to an early stage of society for its 
 origin. Man, the serpent, the Elohim-beings and the cherubs associate, as
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 199 
 
 then to the writer's special purpose to explain certain uni- 
 versal phenomena of human life. He no more explains the 
 origin of sin than do the prophets and psalmists ; he relates 
 its historical beginning, but he takes for granted its psy- 
 chological ground, and in this sense it seems to have been 
 understood by succeeding generations for a considerable time. 
 The serpent in the narrative is an enigmatical figure. 
 There is no hint that he is anything but the animal, wise 
 above other animals, acquainted with the conditions of 
 man's life and with his relations to the Elohim, but still 
 simply and wholly the animal ; the punishment inflicted 
 on him relates solely to the habits of the beast. But there 
 seems to be a difficulty in supposing that the writer of 
 Gen. iii. could attribute such a role to a beast. A serpent 
 endowed with reason, and capable of circumventing the de- 
 signs of God, is a character which might seem impossible 
 to Jewish thought. It has therefore appeared to many per- 
 sons necessary to hold that the writer meant to represent 
 the animal as merely the vehicle of a malignant spiritual 
 being. Such was the view taken in later times. But is 
 there any ground for attributing such a view to our au- 
 thor? The opinion that the lower animals in primitive 
 times were endowed with reason makes no difficulty ; it 
 was widely held in antiquity. 1 The serpent of our chap- 
 ter must be regarded as going back to a very early time, 
 the survival and transformation of an old mythical figure, 
 at first probably a literal snake, then gradually interwoven 
 into more developed myths. Such a malign figure might, 
 in the course of generations, take just the shape and play 
 
 it were, on equal terms, a characteristic of primitive narratives. The cen- 
 tral idea is man's loss, not of innocence, but of happy ease. 
 
 1 For the evidence that early peoples in all parts of the world made no 
 difference, in respect of reason and speech, between man and other animals, 
 see Tylor's " Primitive Culture," Lang's " Myth, Ritual, and Religion," and 
 similar works.
 
 200 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 just the part of the serpent of Genesis. Given the two 
 conceptions, a hostile dragon-creature, and the lapse of 
 man from a state of primitive happiness, there might 
 not unnaturally result the story of the temptation and fall. 
 The Jews may have received it, with the two facts com- 
 bined, during or shortly before the exile, and impressed on 
 it the monotheistic stamp, the relation of the serpent and 
 the man to God which we now find in the story. 1 It may 
 seem strange to us, or impossible, that Jews should have 
 been willing to accept such a history from their heathen 
 neighbors. But we must recollect that the Jews of the 
 exilian period were not the Jews of the New Testament 
 times, or of the second century B. c., or even of the period 
 of Ezra and Nehemiah. They were far more receptive ; 
 their religious dogmas had not been sharply formulated; 
 their religious life was not petrified. They found themselves 
 in the midst of a splendid civilization, a people speaking 
 a kindred tongue to theirs, with stories of the olden times 
 whose Semitic impress would deprive them of the appear- 
 ance of strangeness to the Semitic Jew. Such stories, find- 
 ing their way into the little community of exiles through 
 their intercourse with their Babylonian neighbors, might 
 after several generations come to assume a Jewish shape, 
 so that their foreign origin might be forgotten. The ser- 
 pent would be accepted as an instrument of God's dealings 
 
 1 There is no mention of the temptation in the Babylonian written remains, 
 only a possible hint of it in the pictures of the tree with two persons, whose 
 character is not certain. The figure of the hostile dragon (Tiamat) is prom- 
 inent in Babylonian epic poetry, but in the shape in which we now have it, 
 is late and complex. It is certainly connected with the sea, as the name indi- 
 cates ; but how the sea came to be represented as a dragon, and the latter 
 came to be the enemy of the gods (destroyed in the Babylonian story by Bel- 
 Marduk), is not clear. Tiamat, for example, is in the first creation-tablet the 
 mother of the gods and of the world. The figure seems to involve the blend- 
 ing of several different lines of mythical narrative. The humanized and 
 reflective form of the story in Genesis indicates a comparatively late period 
 for its final redaction.
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 201 
 
 with man in those far-away times when all the conditions 
 of life were different from ours. The Jew would think it 
 unnecessary to ask how a beast could do such great things, 
 or why the serpent rather than any other beast should have 
 been the actor. The story would be accepted with the same 
 simplicity with which the prophetic writer of Gen. vi. details 
 the history of the angels who came down to earth and took 
 to themselves wives of the daughters of men. These were all 
 things that lay outside of present experience ; but they were 
 believed to belong to a unique period of human history. 
 
 We should reach the same view of the serpent if we 
 supposed the story to have been brought by the Jews from 
 Mesopotamia and gradually worked up into its present 
 shape. The difficulties in the way of this supposition have 
 already been stated ; but on the other hand, there are some 
 features of the narrative that may seem to favor it. The 
 story abounds in incongruities, as if it were the abridgment 
 of an originally much longer narrative. The representation 
 of the divine being is of that highly anthropomorphic char- 
 acter which we more naturally refer to early times : Yahwe 
 brings the animals to Adam to see what he will call them, 
 and only after a detailed examination is it discovered that 
 there is among them no companion corresponding to man, 
 no help meet for him, and it then becomes necessary to cre- 
 ate a special being ; Yahwe walks in the garden in the cool 
 of the day, that is, the evening, because the heat was 
 insupportable at other times ; he cannot at first find Adam, 
 who has hidden himself ; he comes down for the purpose 
 of finding out the state of things by personal inquiry, and 
 it is by cross -questioning that the facts are elicited ; he 
 fears that the man will eat of the tree of life and live 
 forever, he does not (apparently cannot) withdraw from 
 the tree its virtue, but drives man from the garden, and 
 stations cherubim to guard it. Similar anthropomorphisms
 
 202 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 are found in the stories of the flood and of the Tower of 
 Babel, and indeed elsewhere (Gen. xviii ; Ps. Ixviii.). In 
 their origin they belong to an undeveloped state of re- 
 ligious thought ; but, handed down by tradition, they might 
 in much more advanced times be accepted and retained as 
 sacred lore. Anthropomorphisms and incongruities do not, 
 however, settle the question of origin ; they may have been 
 old-Babylonian as well as old-Hebrew. 
 
 The role of the serpent began very soon to cause diffi- 
 culty in men's minds. The same sort of doubt arose as 
 now exists among us. What was this serpent ? Whence his 
 power and malignity ? It would be natural to connect him 
 with an evil spirit and to identify him with Satan when 
 the doctrine of a great spiritual adversary of Israel and 
 of man had been sufficiently developed. This identification 
 does not occur in the Old Testament. But we know that 
 the person of Satan was constantly growing in distinct- 
 ness. In the book of Chronicles (1 Chron. xxi. 1), Satan 
 tempts David to number Israel, apparently for the purpose 
 of bringing misfortune on the king and on the people. It 
 is a procedure parallel with that of Gen. iii. ; in both cases 
 the tempter suggests an apparently desirable act which he 
 knows will excite the displeasure of God. We are not able 
 to trace the development of Satan further in the Old Testa- 
 ment. The book of Daniel, with its large machinery of 
 angels, some of whom are unfriendly to Israel, makes no 
 mention of the great adversary. The Wisdom of Solomon, 
 however, seems to give a definite interpretation of the ser- 
 pent of Gen. iii. : " God created man for immortality, and 
 made him to be an image for his own being [or, his own 
 eternity], but through envy of the devil came death into 
 the world" (ii. 23, 24). There can be little doubt that the 
 author here identifies the serpent with the devil ; and as 
 he speaks of this act of the Evil One as well known, we
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 203 
 
 must suppose that the identification in question had been 
 made by the Jews some time before, that is, probably as 
 early as the third century B. c. 1 The thought of the time 
 favored such a view. There was a growing belief in the 
 influence of spirits, good and bad, on human life ; and the 
 literary and scientific culture of the day more and more in- 
 disposed men to attribute to an animal the part played by 
 the serpent in the history of the first man's transgression. 
 But even if, as is pointed out above, the serpent of Gen. 
 iii. is not to be identified or connected with an evil spirit, 
 does it follow that the narrative is to be taken literally ? 
 May it not have been intended as an allegory ? The ser- 
 pent might represent the lower, animal nature in man, from 
 which comes so largely the inducement to sin. 2 The author 
 would then picture life as a struggle between the opposing 
 tendencies of the human soul, and the experience of the 
 first man would be presented as typical of all succeeding 
 human experience. Such a view is in itself quite con- 
 ceivable, but is open to various objections. It is entirely 
 without exegetical support. The writer by no word hints 
 that the serpent is to be taken otherwise than literally; it 
 is the real animal that is cursed ; it must be the real ani- 
 mal that tempts. Further, the narrative does not represent 
 Eve as yielding merely to a solicitation of the lower nature. 
 Such was the opinion of the rabbis, but it is not borne out 
 by the text. What the serpent promises is that man shall 
 be made equal to the Elohim in knowledge of good and 
 evil, that is, in general moral- intellectual power, surely 
 
 1 It has already been suggested that the sharper isolation of Satan and his 
 identification with the serpent were first effected in Egypt, where Greek and 
 Egyptian ideas were influential. In the earliest part of the hook of Enoch 
 (a Palestinian production), i.-xxxvi., lxxii.-cv., it is Azazel who is the chief 
 representative of evil , in the Parahles (of later date) he is identified with 
 Satan (liii. 3 ; liv. 5, 6). We have here an indication of the gradual coales- 
 cence of different lines of development of the principle of moral evil. 
 
 2 Philo (i. 79) regards the serpent as a symbol of sensual pleasure.
 
 204 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 not a despicable prize. As to Adam, his reason for eating 
 the fruit is not given ; it is only said that he took it when 
 it was offered him by his wife. In the case of Eve, it is 
 added that she observed the beauty of the fruit ; a sensual 
 motive thus existed, but it is not represented as predom- 
 inating over the higher intellectual reason. Such an alle- 
 gorical narrative might be possible for the time when this 
 story was put into shape (fifth century B. c.) ; but if that 
 had been the author's intention, he would certainly have 
 given an indication of it, as we find in Isa. v., Ezek. xvi., 
 Ps. Ixxx. The abstract character of the supposed allegory 
 would, however, occasion doubt ; such a representation, the 
 antagonism between the higher and lower elements of the 
 soul, seems more appropriate to the first century of our 
 era than to the age of Ezra. 
 
 In this connection we may notice our author's representa- 
 tion of death. Death is regarded in the Old Testament as 
 the common lot of men (the teaching of experience), 1 and 
 as the greatest of evils (since existence in Sheol was looked 
 on as colorless and negative, devoid of pleasurable activity). 
 It was viewed vaguely as the inevitable outcome of human 
 weakness, though it might be prematurely inflicted by God 
 in the way of punishment. 2 Except in Gen. iii., no other 
 explanation of its presence is offered ; it was accepted as 
 an ultimate fact. In the history in Gen. iii., man is re- 
 garded as mortal, yet as capable of earthly immortality. 
 If he had eaten of the tree of life, he would have lived 
 forever ; and it does not appear why he did not eat of it 
 
 1 Nothing is said of a sentence of death passed on the lower animals ; their 
 mortality is assumed (Ps. civ. 29). and is not supposed to need explanation. 
 
 2 In rare cases (Enoch, Elijah) a man was held to have passed out of 
 earthly life without suffering death ; he was taken directly to the abode of 
 the Elohim. Parallel instances among other peoples are numerous. Such 
 representations appear to issue out of the primitive conception of the essen- 
 tial identity between gods and men.
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 205 
 
 while he had opportunity. 1 After his sin the punishment of 
 death was denounced against him, perhaps not as stamp- 
 ing mortality on him, but as declaring that he should not 
 gain immortality by the life-giving tree. The death thus 
 imposed was physical and temporal : " Dust thou art, and 
 to dust thou shalt return." There is no hint of a present 
 spiritual death of the soul, nor of everlasting death here- 
 after, which did not belong to the writer's circle of ideas. 
 The addition made to the general Old Testament teaching 
 by this story is that the first man (and presumably the 
 whole race) lost the gift or possibility of earthly immor- 
 tality by an act of transgression. Such is the view given 
 in the Wisdom of Solomon (ii. 23, 24) : "God created man 
 to be immortal, . . . but through envy of the devil death 
 came into the world." The statement in Ecclus. (xvii. 1) 
 " the Lord created man of the earth and turned him into 
 it again" is indefinite. According to Ecclus. (xxv. 24) and 
 Philo (i. 79), it was through the woman that sin and death 
 came into the world. 
 
 The literature between the Old Testament and the New 
 Testament shows no development in the idea of sin. Differ- 
 ent tendencies, no doubt, existed among the Jewish people. 
 The nation as a whole came under the control of nomism ; 
 sin, conceived as the violation of some precept of the ex- 
 ternal law, tended to assume a mechanical character. Where 
 the conduct of life was ordered by minute regulations, the 
 attention was naturally fixed more on the outward precept 
 and less on the spiritual constitution and temper of the 
 soul. This is the conception which we find in the Wisdom 
 of the Son of Sirach, the Sibylline Oracles, Tobit, and the 
 Psalter of Solomon. On the other hand, the existence of a 
 
 1 I here take the narrative as it stands, passing by, as unimportant for 
 the present discussion, the question whether the tree of life belongs to the 
 original form of the story. See Budde, " Biblische Urgeschichte," pp. 46 ff .
 
 206 SIN AND EIGHTEOUSXESS. 
 
 more spiritual view is vouched for by Ps. li., and by the 
 conception of wisdom found in the Wisdom of Solomon and 
 in Philo. In the last two works, though there is no ex- 
 plicit statement of the nature of sin, it is assumed to be a 
 contamination, restriction, and violation of the higher na- 
 ture. The true life of the soul is identified with that wis- 
 dom which involves both accurate knowledge and purity 
 of will; and wrong-doing is therefore thought of as an im- 
 pairment of inward spiritual life. In accordance with this 
 view, Philo holds the body to be the seat of evil and the 
 antagonist of the higher life; it conspires, he says, against 
 the soul ; it is forever dead (i. 100) ; it cannot aid in the 
 attainment of virtue, but rather hinders it (i. 64) ; and so 
 the flesh is put over against the divine spirit, and the two 
 are represented as opposing principles of life : " Men are of 
 two classes, those who order their lives by the divine 
 spirit and reason, and those who live by the blood and the 
 pleasure of the flesh " (i. 481). 1 
 
 The New Testament representation of sin varies with dif- 
 ferent writers, passing from the simple Old Testament view 
 to the conception of evil as the corruption of nature. Its 
 universality is everywhere assumed, as in Luke xiii. 3, 
 Rom. iii. 9-19 ; 2 the teaching of the Old Testament and 
 of general human observation and conviction is accepted 
 without argument. The majority of the New Testament 
 books show no interest in the question of the historical 
 origin of sin. Doubtless the narrative in Gen. iii. was ac- 
 cepted with its later interpretation as given in the Wisdom 
 
 1 This is not to be regarded as the ascetic view that the body is in itself 
 sinful, but only as the representation of the flesh as in general the visible 
 locus and instrument of the lower pleasures. 
 
 2 The passages here cited from the Old Testament are Eccles. vii. 20 ; Ps. 
 xiv. 2, 3 ; Ps. v. 10 (9) ; Isa. lix. 7, 8 ; Ps. xxxvi. 2(1); Ps. cxliii. 2. None of 
 these, except the first and last, affirm sinfnlness of all men ; the reference, 
 with the exception stated, is to the " wicked," who are simply the enemies of 
 Israel ; their point of view is rather national than moral.
 
 SIN AND KIGHTEOUSNESS. 207 
 
 of Solomon (ii. 24) ; the common view must have been that 
 man fell from purity by the temptation of the devil. But 
 it seems to have been felt that for the moral-spiritual life, 
 this historical fact was of small importance ; the practical 
 thing was to recognize the present relation of sin to the 
 soul. Jesus lays stress on the fundamental fact that the root 
 of evil is in the heart, whence proceed evil thoughts and 
 deeds which defile the man (Matt. xv. 19, 20) and define the 
 character of his soul, for the tree is known by its fruit, and 
 out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks (Matt, 
 xii. 33, 34). So in the Epistle of James, the interest is in 
 the present psychological history of sin : " Blessed is the man 
 who endures temptation, for when he has been approved, he 
 shall receive the crown of life which he has promised to 
 those that love him. J^et no man when he is tempted say, 
 I am tempted by God, for God cannot be tempted by evil 
 things, nor does he himself tempt any one ; but each man 
 is tempted when he is drawn away and enticed by his own 
 desire. Then the desire, when it has conceived, bears sin, and 
 the sin, when it is full grown, brings forth death" (James 
 i. 1215). In this connection it would have been not unnat- 
 ural for the writer to refer to the history in Genesis ; but he 
 is concerned with practical life, with the present struggle of 
 man's soul. A universal disposition to sin is here assumed, 
 but the psychological analysis relates to every sinful act. 
 As to the origin of this tendency to evil, its relation to the 
 soul, whether it is to be considered a second nature or an 
 original nature, a divine creation or a human addition and 
 blot, these are questions that the greater part of the New 
 Testament, wholly concerned with practical life, does not 
 touch. The writings of Paul and his school and the Fourth 
 Gospel contain references to the history in Genesis, but 
 merely repeat its statements, without undertaking anything 
 like the spiritual history of the first man ; " By one man
 
 208 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 sin entered into the world and death by sin, and thus 
 death passed unto all men, for that all sinned" (Rom. v. 
 12); "Adam was not beguiled, but the woman, being be- 
 guiled, fell into transgression' (1 Tim. ii. 14); "Ye are of 
 your father the devil, and you will to do the desires of 
 your father" (John viii. 44) 
 
 To the same practical interest we may ascribe the reti- 
 cence of the New Testament respecting the external and in- 
 ternal consequences of Adam's transgression. Did the death 
 inflicted on him (and on his descendants) extend beyond 
 this life and assume the form of everlasting punishment 
 (of annihilation there is no word in either Old Testament 
 or New Testament) ? Did the sentence affect man's moral 
 nature, carrying with it a deadness to higher inward im- 
 pulses and incapacity for holiness ? In the greater part of 
 the New Testament these questions are ignored ; there is 
 no consciousness of their existence. The Christian life of 
 the first century consisted partly in the acceptance of Jesus 
 of Nazareth as the Messiah and Saviour, and the expecta- 
 tion of his speedy return to earth, and partly in the ethical 
 struggle against the hostility and moral evil of the world. 
 Christianity was eminently a serious, real life, whose prac- 
 tical concerns absorbed the energies of men. The Gospels 
 and most of the Epistles are occupied with the present as 
 a preparation for the future ; of the past they think only 
 in so far as it is a prediction of the new kingdom of heaven 
 which has brought peace and moral stability with hope of 
 a coming unspeakable blessedness. Paul, with his analytic 
 and dogmatically constructive mind, is the only writer who 
 feels called on to treat logically the historical beginning 
 of sin ; and even he does it only indirectly. His argument 
 in Rom. v. 12-21 has for its main purpose to set forth 
 the introduction of life-giving righteousness through Jesus 
 Christ. He assumes the historical fact that sin and death
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 209 
 
 entered the world through Adam, but he seems not to think 
 it necessary to define precisely the nature of this death. It is 
 first of all physical in his conception : " Death reigned from 
 Adam till Moses, even over them who had not sinned after 
 the likeness of Adam's transgression" (v. 14). But at the 
 same time he takes for granted that it is everlasting, as 
 appears from the antithesis in v. 21: "That, as sin reigned 
 in death, even so might grace reign through righteousness 
 unto eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord." Further, 
 the contrast running through the paragraph, between the 
 righteousness achieved by Christ and the sinful condition 
 established by Adam, doubtless involved in the apostle's feel- 
 ing the elements of moral corruption and purification. In 
 his view, deadness to the law, the result of faith in Christ, 
 was also deadness to sin, a legal status which could not 
 exist apart from the moral attitude of the soul (ch. vi.). 
 Thus, though he makes no explicit statement of a connec- 
 tion between Adam's sin and spiritual and everlasting death, 
 it may be inferred that the connection existed in his mind. 
 Traces of this conception of the consequences of sin are 
 found in pre-Christian books. But Paul gives it a new 
 prominence ; he was naturally led to this view by his con- 
 ception of Christ as the centre of salvation and the turning- 
 point in religious history, the new divine life brought in 
 by him was to be set over against the preceding period of 
 dull subjection to external law. His view was no doubt 
 shared more or less by the body of churches with which 
 he was in special contact, and by its logical symmetry more 
 and more commended itself to the Christian world. So far 
 as regards a connection between universal human sinful- 
 ness, a fact of experience, and the historical incident de- 
 scribed in Gen. iii , this is in itself not an ethical element 
 of life, and Paul uses it, as we have seen, simply to bring 
 out clearly the inward righteousness created by Christ ; but, 
 
 u
 
 210 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 * 
 
 raised to the rank of a fundamental dogma and held in a 
 mechanical way, it is capable of exerting an injurious effect 
 on the religious consciousness. 
 
 The narrative in Genesis represents the woman as the 
 immediate agent of the introduction of sin into the world, 1 
 and this side of the history is followed literally in 1 Tim. 
 ii. 14 : "Adam was not beguiled, but the woman was be- 
 guiled, and fell into transgression." The lesson which the 
 writer draws from this fact is the subordination of women : 
 " Let a woman learn in quietness, in all subjection ; but I 
 permit not a woman to teach nor to have dominion over a 
 man, but to be in quietness ; for Adam was first formed, 
 then Eve, and Adam was not beguiled," etc. (vs. 11-13). 
 His interest in the narrative is social and practical. Paul, 
 on the other hand, has nothing to say of Eve, but lays all 
 the stress on Adam as the effective person in the trans- 
 action. His is the legal view, which regards the man as 
 the head and representative of the household, alone qual- 
 ified to take legal action, the woman not being sui juris. 
 How far this difference of view existed in Christian circles 
 of that day, it is impossible to say. As we have already 
 seen, the Alexandrian Philo makes the woman the intro- 
 ducer of sin, and the same opinion is expressed in the Wis- 
 dom of the Son of Sirach. Whether Philo represents the 
 Alexandrian Jewish view, and Paul the Palestinian, we have 
 no means of determining ; if the First Epistle to Timothy be 
 regarded as representing Pauline theological ideas, its usage 
 would go to show that both views were held among Pales- 
 tinian Jews. Not improbably Paul was led to select Adam 
 as the central figure in the history of the first transgression 
 
 1 The role thus assigned to woman (and not by the Hebrews alone) is per- 
 haps merely the expression of the ancient opinion of the moral inferiority of 
 the sex (Eccles. vii. 28 ; 1 Tim. ii. 14, 15), such histories having been composed 
 by men. But the origin of the temptation-story is obscure, and it is impos- 
 sible to say what other elements may have determined its present form.
 
 SIN AND KIGHTEOUSNESS. 211 
 
 in order, by contrast with him, to bring out more clearly the 
 work of Christ ; the whole of the Pauline theology is derived 
 from the conception of Christ as the centre of salvation. 
 
 But though the precise religious significance of Adam's 
 sin is scantily treated in the New Testament, there is no 
 doubt as to its affirmation respecting the corruption of 
 human nature. Here again it is the Pauline school and 
 the Johannean writings to which we owe the most definite 
 statements. The synoptic Gospels say nothing of a moral 
 depravity inherent in man. On the contrary, Jesus every- 
 where assumes man's moral capability and independence ; 
 his appeal is to the human conscience and will, which he 
 takes it for granted can perceive and do what is right ; in 
 his view the difference between men consists in the differ- 
 ence of attitude toward God and right. Men are indeed 
 "evil" (Matt. vii. 11) ; but this does not prevent their recog- 
 nition and performance of what is morally good : " If ye 
 then, being evil, know how to give good gifts to your chil- 
 dren, how much more shall your Father who is in heaven 
 give good things to them that ask him ? . . . Every good 
 tree brings forth good fruit, and the corrupt tree brings 
 forth evil fruit ; a good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, 
 nor can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. ... By their 
 fruits ye shall know them" (Matt. vii. 11, 17, 18, 20). The 
 same view is found in the Epistle to James : " Who is wise 
 and understanding among you? let him show by his good 
 life his works in meekness and wisdom. . . . Draw nigh to 
 God, and he will draw nigh to you ; cleanse your hands, ye 
 sinners, and purify your hearts, ye double-minded. ... He 
 who converts a sinner from the error of his way shall save a 
 soul from death and shall cover a multitude of sins " (James 
 iii. 13 ; iv. 8 ; v. 20). This is also the conception of the soul 
 found in the Pastoral Epistles : " We know that the law is 
 good if a man use it lawfully, as knowing this, that law
 
 212 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and 
 unruly " (1 Tim. i. 8, 9) ; " The Lord's servant must not strive, 
 but be gentle towards all, apt to teach, forbearing, in meek- 
 ness correcting them that oppose themselves, if peradventure 
 God may give them repentance unto the knowledge of the 
 truth, and they may recover themselves out of the snare 
 of the devil " (2 Tim. ii. 24, 25, 26) ; " To the end that those 
 who have believed God may be careful to maintain good 
 works " (Titus iii. 8). These passages assume independent 
 moral capability in man, a view of life which may be held 
 along with the belief in the renewing grace of God, as 
 in the Epistle to Titus : " The grace of God has appeared, 
 bringing salvation to all men, instructing us that, denying 
 ungodliness and worldly desires, we should live soberly and 
 righteously in this present age, looking for the appearance 
 of ... Christ Jesus, who gave himself for us that he might 
 redeem us from all iniquity" (ii. 1114); "According to his 
 mercy he saved us, through the washing of regeneration and 
 renewing of the holy spirit, . . . that being justified by his 
 grace, we might be made heirs, according to hope, of eternal 
 life " (iii. 5-7). 
 
 This is substantially the Old Testament point of view, 
 universal moral weakness and natural tendency to sin, with 
 recognition of man's power to will and to do what is right. 
 Christianity, however, by emphasizing the sinfulness of sin, 
 brought out into sharper relief the moral feebleness of human 
 nature and the necessity for the assisting and sustaining 
 grace of God. Paul, under the guidance of his dogmatic 
 system, went a step further, and formulated the doctrine of 
 the natural man's incapacity to do good. In his view, the 
 fatal religious error was the belief in obedience to law as 
 the ground of salvation ; the inability of obedience to save 
 came to rest in his mind on man's inability to obey, and 
 this inability involved or was identical with moral impo-
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 213 
 
 tency. He represents the flesh that is, normal human na- 
 ture as absolutely antagonistic in ethical tone and works 
 to the divine spirit ; each of these elements of life cherishes 
 desires hostile to the other, they are contrary each to the 
 other. All wicked deeds he characterizes as the " works 
 of the flesh " (Gal. v. 17-21). This antagonism between the 
 natural human soul and the divine spirit of purity assumes 
 the corruption of man's heart ; for it is only through Christ 
 that one escapes the dominion of the flesh and comes to walk 
 and live by the spirit. It is essential that the flesh with all 
 its affections and desires that is, the whole ethical side of 
 the natural man be crucified (Gal. v. 24) ; its only hope 
 is death ; and they who sow to the flesh shall reap cor- 
 ruption (Gal. vi. 8). Elsewhere, Paul represents the moral 
 unreceptiveness of unbelievers as the result of blinding by 
 the god of this age (2 Cor. iv. 4), the result of which must 
 be absolute inability to see or to do the truth. The doctrine 
 is expressed definitely in the Epistle to the Romans : " Our 
 old man was crucified with him, that the body of sin might 
 be done away, that so we should no longer be in bondage 
 to sin " (vi. 6) ; "I know that in me, that is, in my flesh, there 
 dwells no good thing " (vii. 18) ; " The mind of the flesh is 
 enmity against God, for it is not and cannot be subject to 
 the law of God, and they that are in the flesh cannot please 
 God " (viii. 7). And yet, with this thorough-going view of 
 man's inward corruption, the apostle still holds to an in- 
 dwelling recognition of the good, a will which is capable 
 of desire, but not of performance : " To will is present with 
 me, but not the power to do what is right, for the good 
 which I would I do not, but the evil which I would not, 
 that I practise " (Kom. vii. 18, 19). Thus he reaches the con- 
 ception of a schism in the soul, a conflict between the true 
 self and the sinful self : " If I do what I would not, it is 
 no longer I that do it, but sin, which dwells in me " (Rom.
 
 214 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 vil 20). 1 This is perhaps an illogical position ; for if no 
 good can dwell in the soul, it is incapable of willing what 
 is right. But Paul is the last man to concern himself about 
 illogicalness. The very intensity of his logical demands nat- 
 urally leads him into inconsistencies. When he is pointing 
 out the need of the righteousness of Christ, he describes in 
 unlimited terms man's natural inability to attain righteous- 
 ness ; but in the examination of his own experience, he finds 
 the most striking proof of his moral incapacity in the help- 
 lessness of his will against the corruption of his nature, 
 that is, he assumes the existence of a will which is on the 
 side of right. What this " I " is, this personality which stands 
 opposed to sin, he does not further explain. Evidently he 
 was conscious of natural good impulses which were over- 
 borne by temptations ; but instead of viewing such impulses 
 as the germ which might be developed into holiness, he 
 fixes his eye on the weak side of his nature and declares 
 it to be totally depraved. It is this side of humanity 
 man's moral debility which the apostle's theological sys- 
 tem led him to insist on ; the other man's independent 
 conscience and recognition of and striving after the good 
 he leaves almost completely out of view. Yet, though he 
 does not elsewhere formulate it, the recognition of man's 
 moral capacity may be discerned in the appeals which he 
 so often makes to the conscience and will ; in his portrait- 
 ure of the moral condition of the heathen world, for exam- 
 ple (Rom. i. 18-32), he assumes in the heathen cauacity to 
 recognize and to obey God. 2 It will be, perhaps, a not un- 
 
 1 It is clear, from vs. 10, 14, 24, that Paul is in this chapter describing the 
 experience, not of the renewed, hut of the natural soul. 
 
 2 It was not unnatural that the apostle's picture of the contemporary 
 Roman world should be a dark one , he was absorbed in the demonstration 
 of his theme that the only possible righteousness is that which is revealed in 
 the gospel, the righteousness that rests on faith in Christ. But it is only a 
 half-view that he gives. In the lives of not a few illustrious men whose biog-
 
 SIN AND -RIGHTEOUSNESS. 215 
 
 fair account of Paul's view to say that he recognizes both 
 those elements of life which force themselves on our atten- 
 tion, moral weakness and capacity for moral good. It is his 
 attitude toward the law which leads him to affirm at times 
 moral deadness, in order to do away with man's pretensions 
 to achieving his own salvation ; he feels that he can prepare 
 the way for the righteousness of Christ only by eliminating 
 the righteousness of the law. 
 
 Complete moral incapacity is affirmed in the Epistles to 
 the Ephesians and to the Colossians, whose theology, who- 
 ever their author or authors may be, is substantially Paul- 
 ine : " And you did he quicken, when you were dead through 
 your trespasses and sins, wherein aforetime you walked ac- 
 cording to the age of this world, according to the prince of 
 the power of the air, of the spirit that now works in the 
 sons of disobedience ; among whom we also all once lived 
 in the desires of our flesh, doing the wishes of the flesh and 
 of the thoughts, and were by nature children of wrath even 
 as others ; but God, being rich in mercy, on account of his 
 great love with which he loved us, even when we were 
 dead through our trespasses, quickened us together with 
 the Christ " (Eph. ii. 1-5, and so Col. ii. 13). Yet here also 
 we have to note the recognition of man's moral freedom in 
 the various precepts (Eph. iv. v. ; Col. iii. iv.), obedience to 
 which is assumed to be within man's power ; the Ephesians 
 are even exhorted to put away the " old man," that is, 
 the corrupt nature. The transition from one of these points 
 of view to another is natural ; at one time the attention is 
 fixed on man's obvious moral weakness, at another time 
 
 raphies have come down to us, and, there is ground to suppose, of many 
 an unnamed household, there were examples of shining or quiet virtue, of 
 patience, devotion, and love. An age must not he judged wholly by its exam- 
 ples of shining wickedness. Nor is this sweeping condemnation necessary to 
 show the power of a righteousness that has its basis in steadfast loving trust 
 in a holy God.
 
 216 SIN AND EIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 on that independence and power of moral action without 
 which no true ethical life can be conceived. 
 
 In the Fourth Gospel, we pass to a conception of life dif- 
 ferent from those above described. The author looks not 
 on the individual, but on the mass of humanity. He does 
 not enter into an analysis of the ethical elements and pow- 
 ers of the human soul, but regards the world, the cosmos, 
 as hostile to God, incapable of apprehending the truth, in- 
 volved in darkness and death. Into this mass of darkness 
 and death Jesus has brought light and life, whereby a con- 
 flict between these opposing powers has been introduced. 
 "In him was life, and the life was the light of men, and 
 the light shines in the darkness and the darkness does not 
 apprehend it ; ... and this is the judgment, that the light 
 has come into the world, and men loved the darkness rather 
 than the light, for their deeds were evil. . . . Jesus spake 
 unto them, saying, I am the light of the world ; he that 
 follows me shall not walk in the darkness, but shall have 
 the light of life. ... I am come a light into the world, 
 that whoever believes on me may not abide in the dark- 
 ness" (i. 4. 5 ; iii. 19; viii. 12 ; xii. 46). In the sixth chap- 
 ter (vs. 33-63), Jesus describes himself as the bread of life, 
 the true manna from heaven, of which a man may eat and 
 never die. Elsewhere it is explained that his words are the 
 source of truth : " The words that I speak unto you, they 
 are the spirit and they are the life " (vi. 63). The world is 
 thus pictured as dead, capable of attaining life only by be- 
 lieving on Jesus, the Son of God, whose teaching is the 
 expression of the absolute truth, who is himself, therefore, 
 the way, the truth, and the life (xiv. 6). And thus the sin 
 of the world is unbelief : the Spirit convicts the world of 
 sin because it believes not on Jesus (xvi. 9). Those who 
 believe are ushered into a new existence and form a sepa- 
 rate community, which stands over against the world in a
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 217 
 
 relation of irreconcilable hostility : " If the world hates you, 
 know that it hated me before it hated you ; if you were 
 of the world, the world would love its own, but because 
 you are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world, 
 therefore the world hates you" (xv. 18,19). So sharp is 
 this separation, so completely removed is the world from 
 the sphere of the divine life, that Jesus, according to the 
 representation of the author, puts it out of the sphere of 
 his intercession : " I pray not for the world " (xvii. 9). Yet 
 it is only by God's choice and drawing that men can detach 
 themselves from the mass of the world and come to Jesus : 
 " No man can come to me except the Father which sent me 
 draw him" (vi. 44). The same antithesis of power and im- 
 potency, however, is here brought out as in the Pauline 
 writings : " You have not his word abiding in you, for whom 
 he sent, him you believe not ; you search the Scriptures be- 
 cause you think that in them you have eternal life, and it 
 is they that bear witness of me ; and you are not willing to 
 come to me that you may have life. ... If you believed 
 Moses, you would believe me, for he wrote of me ; but if you 
 believe not his writings, how shall you believe my words ? . . . 
 All that the Father gives me shall come to me, and him who 
 comes to me I will in no wise cast out " (v. 38-40, 46, 47 ; 
 vi. 37). And as God is thus the creator of the new world 
 of light and truth and life, he stands over against the devil, 
 the author of falsehood : " I speak the things which I have 
 seen with my father, and you also do the things which you 
 have heard from your father. They answered and said unto 
 him, Our father is Abraham. Jesus said to them, If you are 
 Abraham's children, do the works of Abraham. But now 
 you seek to kill me, a man who has told you the truth, 
 which I heard from God ; this did not Abraham. You do 
 the works of your father. They said to him, We have one 
 father, God. Jesus said to them, If God were your father,
 
 218 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 you would love me, for I came forth and am come from 
 God ; I have not come of myself, but he sent me. Why do 
 you not know my speech ? Because you cannot hear my 
 word. You are of your father, the devil, and the desires of 
 your father it is your will to do. He was a murderer from 
 the beginning, and stood not in the truth, because there 
 is no truth in him " (viii. 38-44). The same general view 
 is given in the First Epistle of John. 
 
 The author of the Fourth Gospel, looking at the world 
 from a philosophical point of view, conceives of life as a 
 conflict between the divine and the anti-divine elements. 
 The world is corrupt; but he offers no explanation of the 
 source of its moral evil. 1 It was created by God through 
 Jesus Christ, and yet is out of harmony with God : " He 
 [Jesus] was in the world, and the world was made through 
 him, and the world knew him not" (i. 10). Of the con- 
 dition of the world before Christ came, the author says 
 nothing, yet he assumes that Abraham was in harmony 
 with God (viii. 39, 40). In his portraiture of the moral 
 corruption of the world, he substantially agrees with Paul. 
 But his interest in the question of sin is not an historical 
 one, he seeks no points of connection with the past ; he 
 is concerned only with the fact that into this great corrupt 
 organism, the world, there has streamed a divine life, em- 
 bodied in the words and thus in the person of Jesus Christ. 
 
 1 From his reference to the devil (viii. 44; xvi. 11) it may be inferred that 
 he accepted the current opinion which connected the " prince of this world " 
 with the lapse of the parents of the race from innocence. He does not, how- 
 ever, attempt to bring this fact into relation with the original function of 
 the Logos. His fondness for the term cosmos (more than one-half the occur- 
 rences of this word in the New Testament are found in the Fourth Gospel 
 and the First Epistle of John) suggests the Stoic idea which is adopted by 
 Philo. It would seem, therefore, that on this Philonian conception (Cosmos 
 and Logos) he has simply grafted the Jewish idea of the entrance of sin into 
 the world through an evil supernatural being. But he is so absorbed in the 
 present mission of the Logos that he does not care to account for the fact 
 which makes that mission necessary.
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 219 
 
 His eye is fixed not on man's inward struggle against sin, 
 but on the transforming power of God, which lays hold of 
 man and brings him into the sphere of light and life. 1 
 
 The idea that sin inheres in the flesh as matter does not 
 belong to the teaching of the New Testament. We have 
 already seen that the Old Testament regards the human 
 body as the instrument of the soul, and therefore as often 
 the occasion of sin, but not in any wise as in itself impure. 
 The transition, however, to this latter view of the impurity 
 of the flesh was natural and easy ; the body, being the occa- 
 sion of evil, would without difficulty come to be thought 
 of as its seat. Such seems to be the idea in Wisdom of 
 Solomon (viii. 19, 20), where the author is describing his own 
 birth : " I was a child of excellent disposition, and I obtained 
 a good soul ; yea, being good, I came into an undefiled body." 
 The thought here is not clear ; but there is in any case 
 the suggestion that some human bodies are in themselves 
 impure. So in the passages quoted above from Philo, the 
 flesh is identified with evil ; but in the New Testament the 
 term is used in a figurative sense for the corrupt nature, 
 and there is no indication that the gnostic doctrine of the 
 impurity of matter is held by any New Testament writer. 
 It is opposed and condemned in the Epistle to the Colossians 
 (il 20-23). 2 
 
 1 The peculiar representation in John ix. 34, of the blind man as born 
 in sins, and the idea that the blindness was the punishment of parental sin 
 (ix. 2), belongs to the Old Testament view; we have here a popular concep- 
 tion which does not essentially modify the theory of the Fourth Gospel or of 
 the New Testament generally. 
 
 2 Neither gnosticism nor that asceticism which is allied to gnosticism 
 seems to be a Jewish (or indeed a Semitic) conception. Certainly nothing 
 of the sort is found in the Old Testament, which is rather marked by an 
 intense love of this life and conviction of its goodness. The Kechabite absti- 
 nence from wine was a survival of the old nomad life, and the same thing 
 is probably true of the Nazarite vow, the Nazarites mentioned in the Old 
 Testament are anything but ascetics. The Wisdom of Solomon and the 
 writings of Philo are not of purely Jewish origin, and the same thing may 
 be suspected of the isolated Essenian community.
 
 220 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 The New Testament conception of human sinfulness, there- 
 fore, differs little from the result of general observation. Men 
 are held to be everywhere prone to evil ; and on the other 
 hand, the ethical independence of the conscience and will 
 is recognized. Of the historical genesis of sin in the world 
 almost nothing is said ; the main interest attaches to the 
 present problem of life, the annihilation of sin as a power 
 in the soul. Jesus thinks of this destruction of sin as pro- 
 duced by the voluntary attitude of the soul toward God and 
 man ; in the Epistle of James we find the Old Testament 
 conception of the overcoming of sin by effort of will ; the 
 writings of the Pauline school consider the destruction of 
 sin in the soul to be the result of the death of Christ and 
 the new creation thence resulting. In the Fourth Gospel the 
 celestial light brought into the world by the Son of God dis- 
 pels the darkness of sin in the hearts of those who believe. 
 The characteristic of the New Testament teaching is its in- 
 tense conception of sin as the one great evil in the world, 
 as the central fact of life, around which range themselves 
 all the powers of heaven, earth, and hell. All the mani- 
 festations of God in history look finally to the annihilation 
 of this malignant power of the human soul. 
 
 3. The destruction of sin is the negative side of the divine 
 process of salvation in the Jewish and Christian Scriptures ; 
 the positive side is the attainment of righteousness. The 
 two are inseparably connected ; but it will be convenient to 
 consider first the methods by which the removal of sin was 
 supposed to be effected. 
 
 The legislation introduced by Ezra and Nehemiah, while 
 it contained an elaborate new sacrifice for sin, did not dis- 
 card the older ideas on the subject. Up to the time of the 
 exile, the theory of expiation corresponded with the general 
 ethical and religious status of the nation ; for the prophets, 
 the national sin was the absorbing interest, and they appear
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 221 
 
 as protesting against an earlier opinion, which disposed of 
 sin in an easy, mechanical way by sacrifices. Such was the 
 primitive view respecting offences against God : if the deity 
 was angry, he was to be appeased by a gift ; and this gift, 
 when the sense of the moral guilt of sin was better devel- 
 oped, assumed the form of a vicarious offering. When the 
 offence was against man, forgiveness might be obtained, if 
 it were thought desirable, by repentance and reparation ; 
 in so far as it was conceived also as an offence against 
 God, it was to be atoned for by sacrifice. For the old me- 
 chanical idea that the deity was appeased by a gift tha 
 prophets desired to substitute the conviction of the neces- 
 sity for repentance and reformation. This protest of the 
 prophets represents a most important advance in the eth- 
 ical conception of sin and the deliverance from sin ; it is 
 stated with admirable fulness and clearness by the prophet 
 Isaiah : " Hear the word of Yahwe, ye judges of Sodom ; 
 give ear to the teaching of our God, ye people of Gomorrah. 
 To what purpose is the multitude of your sacrifices to me ? 
 says Yahwe ; I am full of the burnt offerings of rams, and 
 the fat of fed beasts, and I delight not in the blood of bul- 
 locks and lambs and he-goats. When you present yourselves 
 before me, who has required this at your hand, to tread my 
 courts ? Bring no more vain oblations ; incense is an abom- 
 ination to me ; new moon and Sabbath, the calling of assem- 
 blies, I cannot endure, it is iniquity. Your new moons and 
 your appointed feasts I hate ; they are a burden to me ; I 
 am tired of bearing them. And when you spread forth your 
 hands, I will hide my eyes from you ; and when you make 
 many prayers, I will not hear ; your hands are full of blood. 
 Wash you, make you clean ; put away the evil of your 
 doings from before my eyes ; cease to do evil ; learn to do 
 well ; seek judgment, relieve the oppressed, judge the father- 
 less, plead for the widow. Come now, and let us reason to-
 
 222 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 gether, says Yahwe ; though your sins be as scarlet, they 
 shall be as white as snow ; though they be red like crim- 
 son, they shall be as wool" (Isa. i. 10-18). This is the pre- 
 vailing view in the prophetic writings up to the time of the 
 return from the Babylonian exile : wrong must be put away 
 by an act of will ; the right must be done ; the soul must 
 come into an attitude of willing obedience toward God ; then 
 he will pardon the sin, whether of the nation or of the indi- 
 vidual, and bestow the blessings of his favor. This simple 
 ethical conception of the escape from sin by an act of the 
 will, corresponding as it does to human experience, main- 
 tained itself through the Old Testament times and appears 
 in the New Testament. It is one side of the struggle against 
 sin, a side that can never be safely ignored, though it may 
 be conceived in a mechanical way, and lead to a depressed 
 and unspiritual religious life. 
 
 This double view of expiation for sin continued down to 
 the exile. In the temple and the other sacred places the 
 traditional sacrifices were maintained, and the ethical ideas 
 of the prophets no doubt penetrated the mass of the peo- 
 ple to some extent. Alongside of these there was, however, 
 another conception of the way in which sinning man might 
 be reconciled to God. It was a natural feeling that the sin- 
 ner's suffering atoned for his sin ; suffering was the punish- 
 ment of sin ; and when the just measure had been reached, 
 the wrong-doer might hold that the ground of the divine 
 displeasure had been removed. This natural view of the 
 subject had no doubt existed all along among the Israelites 
 (as it has always existed among men) ; but it does not find 
 definite expression till the latter part of the exile, when 
 the grievous affliction of the nation and the hope of coming 
 deliverance led it to take shape in the mind of the second 
 Isaiah : " Speak ye comfortably to Jerusalem, and cry unto 
 her that her time of service is accomplished, that her pun-
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 223 
 
 ish merit is accepted, for she has received at the hand of 
 Yahwe double for all her sins " (Isa. xl. 2). Traces of this 
 feeling may be discerned in the later literature, in the 
 frequent cry, " Lord, how long ? " So just after the re- 
 turn from Babylon the angel of Yahwe appeals to God : 
 " Yahwe of hosts, how long wilt thou not have mercy on 
 Jerusalem and on the cities of Judah, against which thou 
 hast had indignation these threescore and ten years ? " (Zech. 
 i. 12.) Such is probably the feeling underlying the laments 
 of Ps. Ixxix. Ixxx. Ixxxv. 
 
 It was but a step from this conception to the idea of vica- 
 rious human suffering. This idea resides in the theory of 
 solidarity which has always prevailed in the world, and 
 maintained itself in Israel, notwithstanding the larger recog- 
 nition of individual responsibility, which was a concomitant, 
 or rather an element, of the ethical growth of the nation. 
 The members of any social unit as the family, the tribe, 
 or the state were thought of as bound together into a 
 unit of moral responsibility. The sin of the father im- 
 perilled the happiness of his children ; the nation suffered 
 for the faults of its rulers. But on the same grounds, all 
 the members of the social unit would share the blessings 
 achieved by its head : if he was good, they prospered ; if 
 he by suffering wrought out forgiveness of sin, they might 
 share the pardon and its attendant blessing. The idea must 
 have existed in germ from early times, but it could receive 
 full expression only after the moral consciousness had at- 
 tained a relatively large development. The question of the 
 relation of suffering to sin, which had always been in men's 
 minds, came into new prominence during the exile. The old 
 theory was that all suffering was a punishment for sin : the 
 good prospered ; the wicked suffered. So the prophets had 
 explained the destruction of the northern kingdom and the 
 fall of Jerusalem : the people had sinned ; the nation must
 
 224 . SIN AND KIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 be destroyed. But at the same time there had been grow- 
 ing up a consciousness of righteousness. In contrast with 
 other nations, Israel had been obedient to Yahwe. Under 
 the new conditions of life in Babylonia, where there was 
 probably a sifting of the exiles, one section of the nation 
 had come to feel that it was faithful to the divine law, 
 and the question arose why it should be involved in the 
 dreadful suffering of banishment from home and contact 
 with unsympathizing idolaters. The answer which presented 
 itself to the great prophet of the latter part of the exile 
 was that the suffering was vicarious. Through it, he said, 
 the body of the nation was to be brought back to obedience 
 and the favor of the God of Israel. The pious, faithful ker- 
 nel of the nation was the true servant of Yahwe, despised 
 and rejected of men, esteemed to be stricken, smitten of 
 God, and afflicted. Yet in truth it was for the iniquities of 
 the nation that he was bruised ; Yahwe laid on him the 
 iniquity of them all. He was oppressed ; yet in the land 
 of exile, in the midst of enemies, he humbled himself and 
 opened not his mouth. For the transgression of his people 
 he was cut off from the land of the living, though he had 
 done no violence, and there was no deceit in his mouth (Isa. 
 liii. 1-9). Such is the picture which the prophet gives of 
 the suffering of pious souls in the midst of alien enemies. 
 And what was the explanation ? Would Yahwe arbitrarily 
 involve the faithful in the punishment of the unfaithful ? 
 Would he be insensible to the claims of his obedient sons ? 
 Such a supposition was impossible. The prophet rises to a 
 grand conception of the destiny of the nation. As the bearer 
 of the divine word, Israel was to become the centre of illu 
 mination for the nations, the standard-bearer of truth and 
 purity. But to fulfil this mission, Israel must first itself be 
 purified, its sin must be punished and removed ; yet it was 
 not necessary that the needful purifying suffering should be
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 225 
 
 borne by the sinners themselves. It might be laid on inno- 
 cent heads ; and the greater the purity and dignity of the 
 vicarious sufferer, the greater the efficacy of his suffering, 
 and the larger the blessing which would issue from the favor 
 of God thus obtained. The prophet idealizes the faithful of 
 Israel into a personality of perfect innocence (and it does 
 not matter, for the development of the doctrine of vicarious- 
 ness, whether he has in mind the contemporary body of the 
 faithful, or a contemporary or future individual conceived 
 as a representative and ideal Israelite). Out of this suffer- 
 ing was to arise the highest blessing. It pleased Yahwe to 
 bruise his servant ; but when the sufferer's soul should have 
 been made an offering for sin, then he should taste the fruit 
 of his self-sacrifice, he should see of the travail of his 
 soul and should be satisfied (Isa. liii. 1012). Israel should 
 become righteous ; and further, the world should share its 
 righteousness : " It is too light a thing that thou shouldst 
 be my servant to raise up the tribes of Jacob and to re- 
 store the preserved of Israel ; I will also give thee for a 
 light to the Gentiles, that my salvation may come unto the 
 end of the earth" (Isa. xlix. 6); "Strangers shall build up 
 thy walls and their kings shall minister to thee ; . . . that 
 nation and kingdom that will not serve thee shall perish" 
 (Isa. Ix. 10, 12). 
 
 It is only an external effect that is here described ; noth- 
 ing is said of an inward conflict of soul produced by the 
 contemplation of unmerited suffering. It is only the objec- 
 tive idea of vicarious human suffering that is brought out in 
 the exilian prophecy ; and it appears to have been an iso- 
 lated product of this period, a special flight of the pious 
 imagination of one great thinker. There is no reference to 
 it in the post-exilian literature. After the great crisis of the 
 exile and the introduction of the law, it fell into the back- 
 ground, not to be revived till the rise of Christianity. The 
 
 15
 
 226 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 external, ceremonial idea of atonement for sin was definitely 
 formulated by the Law in its system of sacrifices. As has 
 already been remarked, the element of vicariousness enters 
 into sacrifice as a result of deeper moral consciousness. Sac- 
 rifice was at first a gift to the deity, which a profounder 
 sense of moral unworthiness converted into a victim bear- 
 ing the guilt and punishment of the offerer. The Levitical 
 law is not to be looked on as a mere extension and organ- 
 ization of the ritual. It did, indeed, continue and expand 
 the old sacrificial usage, but it embodied also the profounder 
 moral feeling of the later period. Its ritual was in great 
 part the organized expression of the consciousness of sin. 
 The ancient mind, Jewish and Gentile, saw the most definite 
 and satisfactory atonement for sin in the blood, that is, in 
 the life, of a victim. There were, as we have seen, other con- 
 ceptions of expiation, as through the suffering of the offender, 
 or of some human being with whom the offender stood in close 
 social relation ; but the visible surrender of a life answered 
 most completely to the existing ideas of social-religious order. 
 It is not surprising, therefore, that the Law embodied this 
 conception as the national form of deliverance from sin. 
 
 But the Jewish Law made no attempt to provide an atone- 
 ment for all sins ; its restriction in this respect is noteworthy. 
 The offences for which it does provide are, first, sins of igno- 
 rance (Lev. iv.) ; and secondly, certain slighter ceremonial 
 offences, failure to testify in a court of justice, and false deal- 
 ing in money-matters (Lev. v. vi.). To this must be added 
 the expiation of the great day of atonement (Lev. xvi.), which, 
 however, was of a purely national character, and could have 
 had no bearing on individual sins. Offences other than those 
 above mentioned were regarded by the Jewish Law as com- 
 mitted against society, and were punished accordingly. So 
 far as they were regarded also as committed against God, 
 they were expiated only by the punishment inflicted by the
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 227 
 
 state, the whole law, civil and religious, being the enactment 
 of God. The regulations respecting expiation belonged only 
 to visible sins ; the Law is in fact substantially a civil code, 
 the religious ceremonial itself being looked on as part of the 
 outward, social life. Of inward sins, transgressions of the 
 law of purity and love, which belong to the heart, nothing is 
 said ; this was a domain which the national legislation did 
 not undertake to enter. Yet it recognized the idea of vica- 
 rious atonement, and this idea had a wider range than the 
 book of Leviticus would indicate ; it practically included in- 
 tercession. Job is said to have offered burnt offerings for all 
 his children, fearing that they might have sinned (Job i. 5) ; 
 the wrath of Yah we against the three friends is turned aside 
 by a similar sacrifice (Job xlii. 8). The author of the Epistle 
 to the Hebrews (ix. 22) declares that according to the Law 
 there is no remission without shedding of blood; and this 
 statement, though it is to be taken with the restrictions 
 above mentioned, yet accurately represents the prevailing 
 ancient idea of a connection between forgiveness of sin and 
 the blood of an animal-sacrifice. 
 
 But the Law had larger consequences than its mere de- 
 tails would suggest. It cultivated the moral sense of the 
 people into results above its mechanical prescriptions. It 
 developed the sense of sin, as Paul points out (Gal. iii. 19), 
 and therewith a freer feeling which brought the soul into 
 more immediate contact with God. Apart from all legal pre- 
 scriptions, the pious heart cast itself on the mercy of God : 
 "Yahwe is merciful and gracious, slow to anger and plen- 
 teous in mercy. He will not always chide, neither will he 
 keep his anger forever. He hath not dealt with us after our 
 sins, nor rewarded us according to our iniquities. ... As far 
 as the East is from the West, so far hath he removed our 
 transgressions from us" (Ps. ciii. 8-10,12). Sometimes the 
 appeal to God's mercy was based on the feeling of human
 
 228 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 weakness : " What is man, that thou shouldest magnify him 
 and set thy heart on him, that thou shouldest visit him every 
 morning and try him every moment ? ... If I have sinned, 
 what can I do to thee, thou watcher of men ? . . . Why 
 dost thou not pardon my transgression and take away mine 
 iniquity ? for now I shall lie down in the dust, and thou 
 shalt seek me diligently, but I shall not be" (Job vii. 17-21) ; 
 " Wilt thou harass a driven leaf ? wilt thou pursue the dry 
 stubble?" (xiii. 25.) "Man that is born of a woman is of 
 few days and full of trouble ; he comes forth like a flower 
 and withers, he flees as a shadow and continues not ; and 
 dost thou open thine eyes on such an one, and bringest me 
 into judgment with thee ? " (xiv. 1-3.) " Remember not the 
 sins of my youth nor my transgressions ; according to thy 
 lovingkindness remember me for thy goodness' sake " (Ps. 
 xxv. 7) ; " Like as a father pities his children, so Yah we 
 pities them that fear him, for he knows our frame, he re- 
 members that we are dust " (Ps ciii. 13, 14). This direct 
 appeal to the divine mercy is connected with a deeper con- 
 sciousness of sin, such as appears in Ps. xxxii. and li : " I 
 said, I will confess my transgressions to Yahwe, and thou for- 
 gavest the iniquity of my sin " (Ps. xxxii. 5) ; "I acknowledge 
 my transgressions, and my sin is ever before me " (Ps. li. 3). 
 
 To this broader conception of the relation between God 
 and man belongs also the idea of human mediation for sin 
 (the connection of which with the Law is referred to above), 
 as when Job is directed to pray for his three friends (Job 
 xlii. 8), or when Samuel says, "Far be it from me to sin 
 against Yahwe in ceasing to pray for you" (1 Sam. xii. 23); 
 or the prophet Jeremiah declares that even the intercession 
 of Moses and Samuel would not avail for Israel ( Jer. xv. 3 ). 
 Such mediation, however, was not confined to men, if we 
 may understand Elihu's interpreting angel (Job xxxiii. 23, 
 24) as interceding with God for the afflicted man. This idea
 
 SIN AND &IGHTEOUSNESS. 229 
 
 of mediation for the sinner by men or angels, though a per- 
 fectly natural one, does not find frequent expression in the 
 Old Testament 1 or in the Apocryphal books. 
 
 We have to note also the negative attitude maintained 
 toward the system of sacrifice by the great Israelitish teach- 
 ers. The pre-exilian and exilian prophets, though they in- 
 sisted on the necessity of the faithful worship of Yahwe, 
 discerned what was superficial and false in the offerings (in 
 contrast with true ethical service), and denounced it as hate- 
 ful to God : " I hate, I despise your feasts, and take no de- 
 light in your solemn assemblies ; yea, though you offer me 
 your burnt offerings and meal offerings, I will not accept 
 them, nor will I regard the peace offerings of your fat beasts ; 
 take away from me the noise of your songs, for I will not 
 hear the melody of thy viols" (Amos v. 21-23); "To what 
 purpose is the multitude of your sacrifices to me ? says 
 Yahwe. ... I delight not in the blood of bullocks " (Isa. i. 
 11); "Will Yahwe be pleased with thousands of rams, with 
 myriads of rivers of oil ? Shall I give my first-born for my 
 transgression, the fruit of my body for the sin of my soul ? " 
 (Mic. vi. 7) ; "I spake not to your fathers, nor commanded 
 them in the day that I brought them out of the land of 
 Egypt concerning burnt offerings or sacrifices" (,Ter. vii. 22). 
 A similar antagonism or negative attitude, which in the pro- 
 phetic writings is based on moral grounds, appears in some 
 of the Psalms as the result of a like ethical feeling combined 
 with spirituality of thought : " Sacrifice and offering thou 
 hast no delight in; . ... burnt offering and sin offering thou 
 hast not required" (Ps. xl. 6). In Ps. 1., God's indifference 
 toward sacrifices is based on his exalted position as Lord 
 of the world and on the pre-eminence of his moral func- 
 tions : " I will take no bullock out of thy house, nor he- 
 
 1 We may compare the functions of the guardian angels in the book of 
 Daniel (x. 20,21).
 
 230 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 goats out of thy folds ; for every beast of the forest is mine, 
 the cattle on the mountains ; I know all the birds of the 
 mountains, and the roamers of the plain are in my mind ; 
 if I were hungry, I would not tell thee, for the world is mine 
 and the fullness thereof ; will I eat the flesh of bulls or 
 drink the blood of goats ? " (vs. 9-13). We have here the 
 germ of a feeling expressed in the Epistle to the Hebrews 
 (x. 4) that it is impossible that the blood of bulls and goats 
 should take away sin. But while the author of the Epistle 
 insists on the worthlessness of such sacrifices in order that 
 he may substitute another better sacrifice (quoting, curiously 
 enough, Ps. xl. 6, 7, in support of his position), the prophets 
 and psalmists are only concerned with the insufficiency of 
 this outward act as contrasted with the inward service of 
 the soul. The two movements toward elaboration of the rit- 
 ual of sacrifice, and direct appeal of the soul to God, went 
 hand in hand, each responding to a need of the human heart. 
 The body of the nation felt that, in its moral weakness, it 
 could not dispense with some intermediary between man's 
 feeble life and the august holiness of God. And on the other 
 hand, there were moments of exaltation for pious souls when 
 this same conception of the divine purity made all bodily 
 intercession seem worthless, and drove the worshipper to cast 
 himself on the supreme attribute of Israel's God, his pitiful- 
 ness and lovingkindness. Repentance was indeed demanded 
 as the condition of forgiveness : " Pardon my iniquity, for it 
 is great" (Ps. xxv. 11) ; "I said, I will confess my trans- 
 gressions to Yahwe, and thou forgavest the iniquity of my 
 sin " (Ps. xxxii. 5) ; " Against thee, thee only have I sinned, 
 and done that which is evil in thy sight" (Ps. li. 4). Such 
 was the condition, announced by John the Baptist and Jesus, 
 of entrance into the kingdom of God (Mark i. 4, 15). These 
 two elements of the Old Testament thought the inward 
 preparation of the soul through repentance and the outward
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 231 
 
 preparation through intercession the Christian Church en- 
 deavored, with more or less success, to combine hi its re- 
 ligious consciousness into a unity. 
 
 The extra-canonical books add nothing of importance to 
 the Old Testament ideas. The scheme of temple sacrifices 
 continued as before, only with some small additions to the 
 ceremonial. Still, there are hints that the old mechanical 
 conception of atonement was undergoing a gradual trans- 
 formation through all the influences that affected the eth- 
 ical thought of the nation. The books of this period that 
 have come down to us are chiefly the products of messianic 
 or other purely national interest. But the synagogues and 
 legal schools nourished other ideas, spiritual and ethical. 
 The conception of sin as an offence against the absolute 
 right, or against the will of God, held to be identical with 
 the absolute right, shows itself in sayings attributed to the 
 great teachers, and in the Wisdom of Solomon. Atonement 
 for sin was, from this point of view, held to lie in right- 
 doing. This idea (in which non-Jewish influence is discern- 
 ible) was not definitely formulated, but colors such works as 
 Wisdom and the treatises of Philo, and was doubtless not 
 without effect on portions of the New Testament. 
 
 The point of view of Jesus himself was substantially that 
 of the pre-exilian prophets. He recognized the existing sys- 
 tem of national sacrifices (Luke xvii. 14 ; John v. 1 ; Matt, 
 xxiii. 2, 3), and, according to the First Gospel, declared that 
 he had come not to destroy, but to fulfil, the Law and the 
 prophets, and that no rnan could without blame ignore one 
 of the smallest commandments of the Mosaic legislation 
 (Matt. v. 17, 19). 1 On the other hand, in defence of a larger 
 
 1 Some critics regard this last utterance as belonging not to Jesus, but to 
 a Jurlaizing editor of the Matthew-Gospel, and intended as a protest against 
 the supposed Pauline hostility to the Law. In any case, it testifies to a pro- 
 found respect for the Mosaic legislation in a section of the Church of the first 
 century.
 
 232 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 interpretation of the Law, he adduced the example of the 
 priests themselves, and cited (Matt. xii. 5, 7) the words of 
 the prophet Hosea : " I desire mercy and not sacrifice " (Hos. 
 vi. 6). But, ahove all, the pure ethical-spiritual view which 
 he taught (as in the Sermon on the Mount) of man's re- 
 lation to God contained the germs of the destruction of 
 the mechanical legal-sacrificial system, a work which, not 
 undertaken by him, was accomplished by the great apostle, 
 who most truly represented and embodied in deeds the spirit 
 of the Master. 
 
 The early disciples doubtless followed the example of their 
 Master in maintaining allegiance to the temple-service. This 
 is the impression made by Acts i.-v., where Peter and John 
 go to the temple at the hour of prayer (iii. 1), and Gama- 
 liel's speech (v. 38, 39) does not seem to contemplate a fun- 
 damental schism ; and later there is even an account (xxL 
 20-26) of Paul's taking part in a purification-offering. 1 This 
 feeling would naturally survive longest among the Pales- 
 tinian Christians ; elsewhere the bonds which united the 
 Church to the old faith were weakened by distance and by 
 the incoming of Gentiles. The construction of the death of 
 Jesus as sacrificial did away with the old system of animal- 
 offering. This was not a change of the fundamental idea, 
 but only of the nature of the offering. It was still held 
 that the removal of sin and guilt was affected by the shed- 
 ding of blood. But the greater dignity of the victim corre- 
 sponded to a deeper sense of the evil of sin ; the conception 
 of atonement was held in a more distinctly ethical way. It 
 is in the writings of Paul (Gal. i. 4, etc.) that we first meet 
 with the statement of the sacrificial nature of the Messiah's 
 
 1 It is not intended hy this to decide on the general question of the histor- 
 ical trustworthiness of the book of Acts, but only to infer from the passages 
 quoted the existence of a belief that the early Church had not completely 
 broken with the temple-ritual.
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 233 
 
 death ; and we may suppose that he and others were led 
 to this view by their conception of the exalted function of 
 the glorified Messiah in conjunction with their adherence to 
 the Old Testament idea of atonement. Jesus had departed 
 from the world and been raised to the right hand of God as 
 Saviour, whence he would soon return to deliver his people. 
 What function, in the divine scheme, could be assigned to 
 his death but that of expiation of sin, which the Scripture 
 connected with the blood of a victim ? That the old legal 
 view had a strong hold on a part of the Church appears 
 from the earnestness with which the Epistle to the Hebrews 
 endeavors to prove that Christianity really retained the ideas 
 of the ancient system, only substituting for its forms more 
 perfect forms, merging the type in the antitype. 
 
 4. The positive side of the ethical relation between man 
 and God is given in the idea of righteousness ; and we have 
 now to ask wherein righteousness consisted and how it was 
 acquired. 
 
 We need not stop to examine special shades of meaning 
 of the various terms employed in the Old Testament to ex- 
 press the idea of moral goodness. They all go back finally 
 to the conception of some standard of conduct which is re- 
 ferred to God as its author. Such is the usage of the Old 
 Testament in the form in which we now have it, as the pro- 
 duction of men who lived and wrote in a relatively high eth- 
 ical-religious atmosphere. In the earlier, unreflective time, 
 a good man was one who conformed to the somewhat rude 
 ethical ideas of the community. He might be a warrior like 
 Jephtha, who was relentless toward his enemies and capa- 
 ble of sacrificing his own daughter in fulfilment of a vow ; 
 but if he fulfilled the moral demands of the time, he was 
 accounted righteous. From the beginning, the accepted sys- 
 tem of ethics was identified in a general way with the will 
 of the deity, since God could not be conceived of as re-
 
 234 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 quiring anything else than that which the best moral sense 
 of the community called for. There was a double progress : 
 the ethical standard was gradually raised, and at the same 
 time the identification of righteousness with the will of the 
 deity became more and more systematic and conscious. This 
 will was at first announced occasionally and fragmentarily 
 by the priests arid the prophets, and then more definitely em- 
 bodied in legal codes. The elements of the prophetic preach- 
 ing of righteousness were two : the worship of Yah we alone, 
 and obedience to the rules of social ethics. This is the con- 
 trolling view in the Old Testament ; it is the necessary prod- 
 uct of experience and reflection, and at the same time the 
 simplest and broadest theory of life regarded as a mass of 
 actions. The prophets always treat idolatry in connection 
 with its moral accompaniments ; for them it was not only 
 disloyalty to the God of Israel, but also inevitably the occa- 
 sion of moral offence. It was a sin against the covenant 
 which God had made with his people ; it was an alliance 
 with the immoral habits of the surrounding peoples. Their 
 judgment on this point is to be taken with some degree of 
 allowance. There was ground for it in the fact that the 
 Canaanitish worship contained licentious elements ; on the 
 other hand, their own writings show that the body of Israel- 
 itish sin sprang out of Israelitish society, out of human 
 weakness, independently of the particular form of divine 
 service which was followed. The prophets, however, were 
 guided by a true instinct in their opposition to idolatry on 
 moral grounds. The Israelitish religious genius was to de- 
 velop a moral code more strenuous than that of their neigh- 
 bors, and national development in this, as in all other points, 
 was favored by isolation. Idolatry or, to state it more 
 precisely according to the Old Testament conception, the 
 acknowledgment of any other god but Yahwe was a con- 
 fusing and disintegrating fact From our point of view, it
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 235 
 
 was in itself morally indifferent, though an occasion of moral 
 loss ; to the prophets, it was treason against the national 
 idea and the national deity, itself a heinous sin, and the 
 source of all impurities. The introduction of a written code 
 (Ex. xxi-xxiii., ninth or eighth century, and Deuteronomy, 
 end of seventh century) served to define the moral stand- 
 ard and to make the moral life more precise. Nor is it 
 an accident that along with this more definite expression 
 of ethical-religious law we find the first traces of a more 
 spiritual conception of righteousness in the "new heart" of 
 Jeremiah and Ezekiel. Deeper reflection on the inner expe- 
 riences of man and the recognition of a higher standard of 
 life led the better religious thinkers to the conviction that 
 true righteousness could not be defined merely as a series of 
 acts of obedience ; that it must proceed from a heart whose 
 impulses were in harmony with the divine standard of right. 
 Here, then, we have the two tendencies which from this time 
 on determined the ethical-religious development of Judaism 
 and then of Christianity. Both are founded in human na- 
 ture, and represent real and necessary elements of the moral 
 life. Each had its period of supremacy ; the highest result 
 was gained when the two were completely harmonized in the 
 religious consciousness. 
 
 The same conception appears in the Psalms, but intenser 
 and more elaborated. The Psalter is the product of deep na- 
 tional distress. It was in the Greek period, and especially in 
 the second century B. c., that the Jews first felt the poignancy 
 of foreign oppression. They had been contented vassals of 
 Assyrians, Babylonians, and Persians, who recognized and re- 
 spected their religion. By the end of the third century they 
 had grown into a church ; their national existence lost, they 
 clung to their religious faith with a reverence and devotion 
 all the more intense ; they lived in the midst of aliens, who 
 oppressed them in person and property and derided their
 
 236 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 religion. Thus driven into religious isolation, they fell back 
 on God and their own souls; minute outward obedience to 
 the divine commands came more and more to be recog- 
 nized as the mark of righteousness, but at the same time the 
 conviction grew stronger of the need of inward purity, of 
 the ripeness of the heart toward God. The authors of the 
 Fifteenth and Twenty-Fourth Psalms define the ethical con- 
 ditions of alliance with the people of God ; Ps. cxix. is the 
 Ode of the Law, which is extolled as the perfection of truth 
 and the infallible guide of life and source of happiness ; the 
 author of Ps. li., in his deep consciousness of sin and desire 
 of oneness with God, cries out for a new heart, asking noth- 
 ing less than that God would re-fashion the very spring and 
 essence of his moral-religious life. 
 
 Corresponding with this double sense of the nature of 
 righteousness was the twofold view of its source, of the man- 
 ner in which it was to be achieved. The simpler, earlier 
 view was that it was gained by man's effort, by the free 
 determination of his will. Men were held to differ in the 
 attitude of their will toward right ; the final exposition 
 of human conduct was that some men loved and others 
 hated the law of God. The later view, springing from the 
 conviction of human weakness, was that man needed the 
 power of God in his soul. The Old Testament utterances on 
 this point are indeed restricted, being too much controlled 
 by nationalism. The interest of the prophets was centred 
 in the nation as a whole, and the relation of God to the 
 people was one rather of " favor " than of " grace." He was 
 pledged by his choice and covenant to bless Israel with out- 
 ward prosperity and the knowledge of his will ; but indi- 
 vidual morality was taken for granted, and the presence of 
 the divine spirit as an illumining and regenerating power 
 in the individual soul was not distinctly thought of. In 
 the period of storm and stress in the second century B. c.,
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 237 
 
 though individualism had been largely developed, the nation 
 was still the fundamental unit ; righteousness was the con- 
 dition of citizenship in the Church (Pss. xxiv., ci., cf. Ixxxvii.); 
 and while, as we have seen, there were individuals who clung 
 passionately to the divine spirit as the source of life, for the 
 most the essential point was obedience to law secured by 
 right disposition of mind. 
 
 The introduction of the definitely formulated Law was a 
 turning-point in the history of Judaism, the ground at 
 once of its success and of its failure. The Law prepared 
 the way for Christianity, and at the same time repelled the 
 Jewish nation from the Christian reconstruction of the idea 
 of law. Judaism, the Jewish Church, is nomism, the em- 
 bodiment of devotion to a fixed rule of belief and conduct. 
 Other communities of that time, and especially the Romans, 
 had developed systems of life resting on legal standards ; it 
 was only the Jews who identified law with religion. Jew- 
 ish nomism has two elements, that which is common to 
 all legally organized societies, and that which springs from 
 the religious genius of the nation acting in conjunction with 
 certain favorable circumstances. The fusion of the civil and 
 religious codes began at an early period : it appears in the 
 law-book of Ex. xxi.-xxiii., then in Deuteronomy, then in 
 the legislation of the middle books of the Pentateuch, and 
 finally in the Talmud. The civil-religious law sprang out 
 of the national life, was built up, generation after genera- 
 tion, according to national needs, and finally, after the time 
 of Ezra and Nehemiah, effected a social-ecclesiastical organ- 
 ization, in other words, the nation assumed the form of a 
 church. There were internal and external grounds for this 
 movement. The internal ground was the religious instinct 
 of the nation, that inexplicable necessity which it felt 
 for realizing and defining its relation to God, an instinct 
 common indeed to all nations, but assuming among the
 
 238 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 Jews proportions which we can no more explain than we 
 can account for the genius of Plato and Shakespeare. No 
 other nation produced an order of prophets. The flower 
 of the Athenian mind devoted itself to literature, art, and 
 philosophy ; the highest and noblest Jewish thought was 
 consecrated to religion. The prophets passed away, and 
 were succeeded by lyric poets, students of practical life and 
 schools of law ; but all these, no less than their predeces- 
 sors, were inspired by the idea of religion. From the be- 
 lief that God was the only law-giver, it was but a step to 
 the conviction that the national life was to be absolutely 
 regulated by the divine will. The attainment of this end 
 was favored in a remarkable manner by the outward con- 
 ditions of the nation. From the Babylonian exile on, they 
 were inured to the idea of political dependence, they were 
 forced more and more to see that their life as a State was 
 crushed beyond hope of resuscitation, and all the energy 
 which would otherwise have gone into affairs of civil gov- 
 ernment was given to ecclesiastical organization. It is a 
 proof of the intense vitality of the Jewish people that they 
 did not, like the surrounding communities, succumb to the 
 oppression of foreign political domination. Their energy 
 came from, or was in closest union with, their conscious- 
 ness of possession of highest truth and their hope of a bril- 
 liant future. Thus their political annihilation was favorable 
 to their religious growth ; it was an isolation from the great 
 world, which permitted them to sink themselves in religion, 
 like a scholar who retreats to a monastery or a cave in order 
 to give himself up to study. Their freedom from political 
 complications gave them greater liberty in the elaboration 
 of their religious-legal material ; they had to consult the in- 
 terests of no king or noble, the demands of no foreign inter- 
 course, but worked out their scheme in an ideally rounded 
 shape which would have been impossible for a community
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 239 
 
 standing in lively political intercourse with its neighbors. 
 Add to all this the smalluess of the territory in which the 
 Jews found themselves after their return from Babylon. Ee- 
 ligious centralization was comparatively easy when no inhab- 
 itant of the land was more than a few hours' journey from 
 Jerusalem. A rigidity of organization was effected which 
 would have been impossible in a larger community. This 
 state of things gradually changed, it is true, but not before 
 Judea worked out the fundamental principles and methods 
 of the nomistic life. 
 
 The Jewish Law was a mass of prescriptions, civil, moral, 
 religious, ceremonial, an attempt to define all the beliefs 
 and acts of life. What we commonly call the Law is the 
 body of legislation contained in the Pentateuch ; that is, 
 the form which the code assumed in the time of Ezra and 
 Nehemiah. In fact, however, the Law came in later times 
 to include much more than this : as the legislation of Ezra 
 was a development of earlier material, so it became the basis 
 for a succeeding development, courts and schools of law 
 added much by way of interpretation and application, which 
 became as binding as the words attributed to Moses. A 
 dividing line was made, it is true, by the canonical books ; 
 the Pentateuch was the text, all else was commentary. But 
 in the feeling of teachers and people, the commentary was 
 no less authoritative than the text. The whole was a lofty 
 attempt to order the social, religious, and political life of a 
 nation, to create an absolute external standard of right. In 
 such an attempt there is nothing necessarily unnatural or 
 wrong. Law is a necessity for human life. The highest 
 effort of individuals and nations is found in the discipline 
 which tends to bring them under the control of a true and 
 high standard of conduct ; perfection consists in the har- 
 mony of the human will with the perfect law. But the 
 attempt to devise and impose an absolutely controlling ex-
 
 240 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 ternal standard is confronted by two difficulties : it is im- 
 possible for man to construct a perfect law, and even that 
 which is relatively perfect for one generation is in danger 
 of losing its pertinency for the next ; and what is more seri- 
 ous, the law does not in itself supply the motive of con- 
 duct, tends, indeed, by emphasizing the outward standard, 
 to attract the will from that inward love and devotion which 
 is the mainspring of the moral-religious life. 
 
 The Jews made the experiment of nomism under most 
 favorable conditions, and with an unexampled fulness of ex- 
 perience. The Law got a hold on the affections of the people 
 of which history furnishes no other instance. Neither Mos- 
 lems nor Parsees ever exhibited such a thoroughgoing aijd 
 intelligent devotion to their sacred books and their systems 
 of life as appears for many centuries in the history of the 
 Jews. The One Hundred and Nineteenth Psalm embodies 
 the reverential delight which the pious Jew experienced in 
 the presence of the perfect instruction granted by the God 
 of Israel to his chosen people. The nation embodied this 
 reverence in its heroic resistance to the Greek-Syrian en- 
 croachments of the second century. The Maccabean strug- 
 gle was a religious war waged to maintain liberty of belief 
 and practice, liberty to obey the law given by God to the 
 fathers. The struggle was successful ; nor in after times 
 was any combination of circumstances able to alienate the 
 Jew from his law. Foreign oppression, political annihilation, 
 dispersion over the world, social contempt and degradation 
 had the effect only of driving the people to a more passion- 
 ate love for that which they conceived to constitute their 
 everlasting glory. If ever a nation was faithful to an idea, 
 the Jews were faithful to the conception of legally ordered 
 life ; and they enjoyed the fruits of their devotion, good and 
 bad. They reached an unequalled fulness and rigidity of 
 social-religious organization. The sharp-sighted earnestness
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 241 
 
 with which they watched over the details of life, the in- 
 terest they threw into the discussion and determination 
 of ininutise of faith and practice may be compared with 
 the metaphysical enthusiasm of the Scottish people. It is 
 not to be supposed that all the individuals of the Jewish 
 nation were equally interested in these questions ; it was 
 the select few who were prominent. The masses may often 
 have seemed indifferent, and a Pharisee might even de- 
 nounce the people as accursed through their ignorance of 
 the' Law (John vii. 49) ; but the leaders gave the tone to 
 the national feeling, the life of the Jewish nation was 
 ordered by religious law. Thus the people enjoyed those 
 benefits which result from habits of organized study, 
 intelligence, alertness, definiteness of opinion, decision of 
 conduct ; and this training of life moved on a high moral- 
 religious level. The ethical and religious ideals of the Jews 
 were in general superior to those of their neighbors ; their 
 God was just and righteous. Their ethics not only included 
 the laws of ordinary social morality, but was moving toward 
 more spiritual principles of sympathy and love, arid their 
 religious ideas were growing broader and purer. Such is 
 the bright side of the Jewish nomistic development, the 
 creation of a self centred, well-balanced, intelligent, and 
 strenuous moral-religious life, illustrated by many shining 
 examples of lofty probity and spiritual piety. 
 
 On the other hand, nomism brought its inevitable evils. 
 The consciousness of superior privileges and enlightenment 
 called forth a national and individual pride which was hos- 
 tile to moral-religious growth. The Jews had a far more 
 definite historical feeling than their neighbors. Their rec- 
 ords went back to a remote antiquity, and their history was 
 an embodiment of the fact that the one Supreme God had 
 chosen them from the beginning to be his own, and had with- 
 out ceasing guided their fortunes toward a glorious future, 
 
 16
 
 242 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 which was not the less sure because the present was dark. 
 Natural satisfaction in so remarkable a career had grown, by 
 the beginning of the second century B. c., into overweening 
 pride. The world was divided into Jews and not-Jews. The 
 leading minds of the nation cherished a lofty scorn of for- 
 eign thought and civilization. A part of the people, indeed, 
 were allured by the splendors of Greek life, and forsook the 
 faith of their fathers ; but this partial apostasy only served 
 to intensify the zeal and the unrelenting hate of the faithful. 
 To the pious of the second century the Greeks were the em- 
 bodiment of everything sensual and devilish. 1 This hatred 
 of national enemies was not new: it appears in exilian proph- 
 ecies (Tsa. xxxiv. 45 ; Jer. 1., li. ), and was to appear later in 
 the struggles with the Romans and other peoples. It was 
 in itself a morally injurious attitude, though for the rest one 
 not confined to the Jews. It had the further effect of tend- 
 ing to isolate the people from foreign thought, and in so far 
 of dwarfing their intellectual growth. The isolation was not 
 and could not be complete. The traces of foreign influence 
 on Jewish thought cannot fail to be recognized ; but the 
 isolation, so far as it existed, was an evil thing for the Jews. 
 It closed their eyes to the defects of their law, and made 
 them as zealous for the wrong as for the right; and it ex- 
 cluded them from a share in certain better ideas which they 
 might have learned from their neighbors. 
 
 A more serious defect of the nomistic scheme one that 
 entered deeper into the moral-religious life was the exter- 
 nalism which it tended to produce. The natural result of 
 complete devotion to an external law was the breaking up 
 of life into minute details, the loss of unity and the loss 
 of spirituality. The biblical code was comparatively simple 
 so far as the conduct of daily life was concerned ; but the 
 
 1 See First and Second Mnccahees and the Sibylline Oracles, passim. A 
 similar feeling appears in the first chapter of Romans.
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 243 
 
 application of the principles of the Law, guided by zealous 
 consciences, led gradually to the multiplication of partic- 
 ulars bearing on all the acts of life. The full development 
 of this scheme is found in the Talmud ; but we may be sure, 
 on general grounds and from the hints given in the New 
 Testament, that much of it was already in existence at the 
 beginning of our era. The frame of mind of the pious Jew 
 of that period must have been one of frequent anxiety lest 
 he should omit something that was essential to righteous- 
 ness ; for the most unhappy result of this developed scheme 
 of law was the definition which it gave of righteousness as 
 obedience to a mass of precepts. Power of spiritual discrim- 
 ination and purity of spiritual life were dimmed and dulled. 
 The prescriptions of the Law included duties of the most 
 various kinds, ceremonial, moral, and religious, insignificant 
 details of ceremonial cleanliness standing side by side with 
 most important ethical rules and religious principles. Men 
 became habituated to looking at the Law as a whole. The 
 principle was established that he who offended in one point 
 was guilty of all (James ii. 10). It was inevitable also that 
 the ceremonial side of the Law, because it was visible and 
 tangible, should assume constantly increasing proportions, 
 and tend to cramp or expel broader principles. The human 
 mind is so constituted that, provided an outward show of 
 duty is maintained, men are content to slur over the inner 
 life, the thoughts and intents of the heart, which are invis- 
 ible to their fellows, and which they cannot be summoned 
 before a human tribunal to account for. It is the history of 
 all religious organizations, only more patent and developed 
 in the Jews of this time. 
 
 Casuistry came in as the natural accompaniment of this 
 outward scheme of righteousness. Where there was an in- 
 tellectual assent to obligation without the full assent of the 
 heart, the temptation would arise to get rid of oppressive
 
 244 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 duties by an ingenious process of reasoning, by substituting 
 the pleasant for the unpleasant, and explaining away what 
 was disagreeable by the pretence of higher obligation. There 
 is no more sacred duty than care for one's parents ; but a 
 man might declare that money which should have been so 
 appropriated was devoted to God, arid so withhold it from 
 father and mother, while by an ingenious device he enjoyed 
 the use of it for himself (Mark vii. 10-13). There were sim- 
 ilar shifts for dispensing with other acknowledged duties. 
 It was debauching the conscience in the name of religion. 
 It was a phenomenon of the same sort as that which Pascal 
 describes in the "Provincial Letters." Such Jews were in 
 the moral position of school-boys who consider themselves 
 justified in evading the master's rules by any device which 
 is likely to escape punishment. It amounted so ,far to a 
 paralysis of the moral sense. Fortunately, such tendencies 
 bring their own cure. 
 
 Such a scheme tended to depress spirituality. It obscured 
 the fundamental principle of life, that goodness consists in 
 the attitude of the soul toward the right. It metamorphosed 
 God into a list of commands, and life into a chaos of obe- 
 diences. It was slavery to the letter of the Law. It dwarfed 
 the liberty of the soul by repressing its instinct of love. It 
 took away the ideal of righteousness which the mind of man 
 naturally tends to shape for itself, and substituted in its 
 place a body of rules which could not command the best 
 affection of the heart. It stamped failure on religion. Where 
 there should have been a generous lifting- up of the soul into 
 a self- forgetting purity and love, there was the self-seeking 
 devotion to a mechanical scheme of personal righteousness. 
 The great transforming power of religion, purification from 
 selfishness, devotion to truth for its own sake, was lost in 
 the multitude of cramping details which falsely assumed the 
 name of obedience to God. Eighteousness was not the es-
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 245 
 
 seiice of the soul, but a garment which could shift its place 
 and be put off and on at the pleasure of the wearer. 
 
 But while this is a fair description of the logical ten- 
 dencies of the Jewish Law, it must not be supposed that 
 its injurious effects were universal in the nation. We must 
 remember that much of the Law is moral, and that no 
 one could fail to feel a spiritual significance beneath its let- 
 ter. The book of Deuteronomy with impressive eloquence 
 preaches loving obedience as the essence of piety. Along- 
 side of the Law were the prophets and the Psalms, which 
 could not have remained without effect on the religious life 
 of the nation. There is no proof that the excessive insist- 
 ence on ceremonial details existed in the masses of the 
 people ; it was probably confined to the few, the bigots 
 who formed a separate party and held themselves aloof 
 from the masses. It is the Pharisees that Jesus attacks, 
 never the people at large. Doubtless the mechanical 
 side of the nomistic system made itself felt everywhere, but 
 it was not necessarily always fatal. It made its appear- 
 ance in the Christian Church also, was predominant at 
 certain times and in certain places, but in the main suc- 
 cumbed to the higher principle of liberty announced by 
 Paul. We may believe that the germ of this principle ex- 
 isted among the Jews of the two centuries preceding the 
 beginning of our era. It is found in the Psalms and the 
 prophets ; it could not have been completely extinguished 
 by the Law. The later Jewish history presents many noble 
 figures, from Mattathias and Judas Maccabreus to Hillel, 
 Gamaliel, Akiba, and Jehuda the Holy. The trouble witli 
 Judaism was not the absence of spirituality ; it was the 
 inability sufficiently to isolate this principle and make it 
 the controlling power. Toward this end the Christianity of 
 Jesus and Paul took a long step ; the Christianity of later 
 times, yielding to the constant pressure of the unspiritual
 
 246 SIN AND KIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 side of human nature, receded toward the mechanical con- 
 ception of religion. Jesus found a not inconsiderable body 
 of the people ready to receive his teaching. The common 
 folk heard him gladly, a sign of spiritual receptivity. 
 The early Church was composed of Jews, who, if not eman- 
 cipated from the narrow Jewish idea of law, had yet been 
 able to accept part, at least, of the more spiritual doctrine 
 of Christ. The germ of spiritual reconstruction lay in the 
 people. 
 
 5. The progress of the Jews in religion, or, what amounts 
 practically to the same thing, in devotion to the Law, is 
 marked by the rise of synagogues, parties, and legal schools. 
 
 The beginning of synagogal worship is involved in some 
 obscurity. 1 It is not unlikely that during the Babylonian 
 exile the captives would meet together to listen to the 
 exhortations and consolations of the prophets and to pray 
 for the peace of Jerusalem. Deprived of the temple, the 
 centre of the old religious service, they would be forced to 
 devise non-ritual modes of worship, to dispense with sacri- 
 fices and address themselves directly to God. There is no 
 record of such gatherings ; but a hundred years later, in the 
 prophecy of Malachi, we find a hint that the faithful were 
 accustomed to meet together and speak one with another 
 (Mai. iii. 16), doubtless on things pertaining to the worship 
 of God. Jewish tradition, indeed, places in the time of Ezra 
 and Nehemiah the Great Synagogue, a body of men who are 
 said to have pronounced on all questions affecting the na- 
 tional religion ; but there is positively no evidence for the 
 existence of this body, there is no trace of its work in 
 later times, and it is not mentioned, except in the Talmud. 
 It is an invention of the tradition, after the rise of the legal- 
 
 1 See Hausrath, " History of the New Testament Times," Eng. transl. 
 London, 1878, pp. 84 ff. ; Schiirer, " Geschichte des Judischen Volkes im Zeit- 
 alter Jesu Christi," ed. 2, Leipzig, 1886, part ii. pp. 356 ff. ; Herzog, " Keal- 
 Encyclopadie."
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 247 
 
 scholastic system, for the purpose of referring the begin- 
 nings of legal study to the man who is said in the Old 
 Testament to have brought the Law from Babylon. 1 The 
 book of Chronicles knows nothing of synagogues ; they are 
 mentioned in the Old Testament only in a psalm (Ixxiv. 8) 
 which bears evident marks of the Maccabean period. It is 
 strange that there is no mention of them in Josephus or 
 the Maccabean histories. In the New Testament we find 
 them numerous throughout the Roman Empire, and we may 
 infer that they had been in existence no little time. In the 
 absence of any definite information, it seems most probable 
 that they did not assume their developed form before the 
 beginning of the second century B. c., though the idea may 
 have come into existence earlier. Their influence on the 
 religious development of the Jews must have been enor- 
 mous. Meeting Sabbath after Sabbath to listen to the read- 
 ing of the Law and the Prophets, the people became familiar 
 with the sacred writings, and were trained to reflection on 
 religious questions ; the synagogues would become the natu- 
 ral centres of religious movements. In the temple-service 
 the people took no active part ; the ceremonial was con- 
 ducted by the priests, the congregation was the passive 
 recipient of the blessing. But in the weekly meetings of 
 the synagogue each individual felt that he had a share ; 
 individual independence and moral-religious strenuousness 
 were cultivated. The custom arose of having addresses to 
 the congregation in explanation or application of the scrip- 
 
 1 Pirke Aboth, i. 1 " Moses received the Law on Sinai and delivered it 
 to Joshua, Joshua to the elders, the elders to the prophets, and the elders 
 delivered it to the men of the Great Synagogue." Berakoth, 33 a : " The 
 men of the Great Synagogue appointed for Israel the benedictions and the 
 prayers, the formulas of consecration and distinction." The body consisted 
 of one hundred and twenty men (Meg. 17 b), and continued to about the time 
 of Simon the Just, B.C. 219-199 (Pirk. Ab. i 2 ; Ecclus. 1.). The extent of 
 its alleged activity has already been referred to ; it was held to have edited 
 various books of the Old Testament, and to have settled the sacred Canon.
 
 248 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 tural reading, and liberty of speech was accorded to every 
 one. Thus, while attachment to the Law was strengthened, 
 freedom of discussion was promoted, and it could not fail 
 to be the case that many serious questions of religion should 
 come up for consideration. 
 
 So active and intellectual a religious life as that of the 
 Jews of the third and second centuries B. c. naturally pro- 
 duced different tendencies of thought, and called into exist- 
 ence parties which embodied them. It was a stirring and 
 excited time, a formative period, next to that of the pre- 
 exilian prophets, the most striking epoch in Jewish religious 
 history. Before the Babylonian exile, the national growth 
 had been comparatively simple and quiet. The elements of 
 progress were furnished almost entirely by the nation itself ; 
 the prophets, as the expounders of the national conscience, 
 were the preachers and establishes of the fundamental prin- 
 ciple of ethical monotheism ; the priests, aided by the judges, 
 and perhaps stimulated by the example of the Assyrians, 
 were the formulators of the civil and ceremonial law, which 
 arose out of the needs of Jewish society itself. The exile 
 was a time of seething and sifting. The Jews accepted ideas 
 from the Babylonians and worked them up in the spirit of 
 their own institutions ; but these ideas were Semitic and in 
 the line of the existing Jewish thought. The result of the 
 whole process was the Pentateuch and the reconstruction of 
 the nation as a church. There followed a century of quiet, 
 during which the new organization was acquiring firmness 
 and adapting itself to the national life ; then came the Greek 
 conquest. The Jews, no longer a quiet province of the Per- 
 sian Empire, found themselves enclosed in a network of 
 Greek kingdoms, and invaded on every side by Greek cus- 
 toms and ideas. There was a gradual infiltration of foreign 
 thought, Persian and Greek ; the doctrines of immortality 
 and the resurrection received definite shape ; Greek ethical
 
 SIN AND EIGHTEOUSNESS. 249 
 
 and theological ideas were in the air, and mingled with and 
 colored the old Jewish conceptions. The new ideas were dif- 
 ferently received by different sections of the nation. One 
 party planted itself firmly on the existing national tradi- 
 tions and discouraged their further development, while it 
 showed itself kindly disposed toward foreign manners and 
 in part toward non-religious foreign thought. Another party, 
 accepting the Law as the national idea, endeavored to de- 
 velop it in the spirit of the age. A third party represented 
 extreme national particularism. In a fourth a tendency to 
 mystical asceticism showed itself. 1 There was a strife of 
 warring opinions, full of earnestness and bitterness, for it 
 was held that the true life of the nation was at stake. 
 While these tendencies were slowly formulating themselves, 
 came the series of political events which crystallized them 
 into parties. The Syrian Greeks attempted religious coercion 
 of the Jews ; it was necessary to take sides. The Maccabean 
 War secured the independence of the country. In the quiet 
 that ensued in the second half of the second century the 
 great parties assumed definite shape. 
 
 When Mattathias retired into the wilderness to make fight 
 against the Greeks, he was joined by a party of men called 
 Asideans (1 Mac. ii. 42 ; 2 Mac. iv. 6), distinguished by their 
 devotion to the national law and customs. They were the 
 Hasidim of the book of Psalms, the pious, godly men who 
 stand everywhere in contrast with wicked heathen and apos- 
 tate Israelites. They seem not to have formed a religious 
 party in the strict sense of the term ; they were rather men 
 of exemplary piety, who would make no compromise in faith 
 and practice. They were a product of the times ; they had 
 
 1 On the parties see Wellhausen, "Die Pharisaer und die Sadducaer," 
 Greifswald, 1874, the works of Hausrath and Schiirer, the dictionaries of 
 Winer and Herzog, Kuenen's " Religion of Israel," Lightfoot's Commentary 
 on Colossians.
 
 250 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 grown; by a natural process of discrimination, out of the con- 
 flicts of heathen opinion. In the Psalms they are intensely 
 national, confident in trust in God, bitter against enemies. 
 The picture given of them in the Psalter corresponds exactly 
 with the social-political condition of affairs in the first half 
 of the second century. It was they that furnished the ma- 
 terial out of which the Pharisaic party was formed. 
 
 The Pharisees, as the name imports, 1 were the "sepa- 
 ratists," the party which was marked off from the rest of 
 the nation by its rigid adhesion to the moral and cere- 
 monial requirements of the law. 2 But the essence of their 
 party-character lay deeper than this, they were the rep- 
 resentatives of nationalism in the broader sense. They ac- 
 cepted the Pentateuchal legislation as the fundamental law 
 of the nation ; but they saw that to make it effective, it 
 must be defined in a multitude of particulars, it must 
 enclose the life of the people in a network of prescriptions. 
 They boldly took the position that this oral, administrative 
 legislation was no less authoritative and binding than the 
 Mosaic Law. From their point of view, they were logical 
 and right. If the true life of the nation depended on its 
 fidelity to the Pentateuchal law, it was necessary to make 
 that law intelligible and real. It was no narrow and ill- 
 considered view that the Pharisees took of the situation. 
 What the nation was it had become, they believed, through 
 the Law ; and they held that all prosperity depended on 
 maintaining this absolute standard of right, which alone 
 could train the people into moral-religious vigor. The de- 
 fect and the danger of their view of the national life were 
 such as have been above described : it lacked spirituality, 
 it tended to formalism and pride. The Pharisees did not 
 limit themselves to Old Testament religious conceptions. 
 
 1 Aramaic, parish, Hebrew, parush, " separated." 
 
 2 Jos. Ant. xviii. 1, 3.
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 251 
 
 Since the days of Ezra and the prophets, the doctrines of 
 immortality and the resurrection had taken shape among 
 the Jews of Egypt and Palestine. These doctrines the Phar- 
 isees seem to have accepted as part of the existing national 
 faith ; for we may infer from the literature (Wisdom of Sol- 
 omon, Daniel, Enoch, Second Maccabees) that they were gen- 
 erally believed in the second century B. c. 1 Whatever the 
 shortcomings and the crimes of the Pharisaic party (and 
 they were great), its function and its mission were broad 
 and noble. It undertook to develop the nation on the basis 
 of the absolute divine law. It accepted at home and abroad 
 whatever it could assimilate, and with singleness of view 
 and unswerving resoluteness rejected all else. It was hos- 
 pitable to foreign ideas so far as these could be made ser- 
 viceable. The attitude of different teachers toward alien 
 thought might vary ; but this was the predominant consid- 
 eration. There were rabbis, like Paul's teacher Gamaliel, 
 who were friendly to Greek study ; there were others who 
 dreaded it as a source of religious infection. The Phari- 
 sees by no means formed an intellectually closed commu- 
 nity. From the notices in the Talmud, we may infer that 
 there was a good deal of liberty of thought among them, 
 which manifested itself in various theological and literary 
 tendencies. Of their contact with Greek ideas we know lit- 
 tle. The Egyptian Jews were decidedly influenced by Greek 
 culture ; the proof is found in such books as the Wisdom of 
 Solomon and Ecclesiastes, and in the writings of Philo. But 
 Pharisaism is more particularly a Palestinian development, 
 and in Palestine Greek thought was less prominent and less 
 known than in Egypt. Still, it can hardly be doubted that 
 
 1 On this point see below, Ch. VII. The references to the future life iu 
 Palestinian works outside of the apocalypses are very few. None are found, 
 for example, in the sayings ascribed (in Pirke Aboth) to the heads of the 
 legal schools, though this may be an accident, and the genuineness of these 
 sayings, moreover, is not beyond suspicion.
 
 252 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 the ethical and religious ideas of the great Greek teachers 
 had found their way from Egypt, Asia Minor, and Syria to 
 Galilee and Jerusalem, and had to some extent modified or 
 directed Palestinian Jewish thought. Josephus describes the 
 Pharisees as Stoics ; and though this may be only a loose 
 attempt to designate them by a term familiar to his Koman 
 public, still it suggests a resemblance. The moral strenuous- 
 ness, the conception of the world as absolutely ordered in all 
 its details by a supermundane power (fate or providence), 
 in general the conception of the absoluteness of law, and the 
 necessity of ordering the life thereby, these ideas, not un- 
 known to the old Israelites, were not improbably in some 
 degree denned and shaped by the better elaborated Greek 
 thought. Pharisaism (and therefore substantially the whole 
 later Jewish life) may be conceived as an amalgamation 
 of Greek and Jewish nomistic conceptions, just as in the 
 thirteenth century Jewish theology, under the guidance of 
 Maimonides, reposed on a blending of Talmudic and Arabo- 
 Grecian philosophy. The two constituents were fused into a 
 unity in Palestine by the overpowering nationalism, as the 
 exiles of the sixth century B. c. absorbed and assimilated 
 Babylonian ideas. Hints are not lacking of the presence 
 of Greek influence in the Jewish schools. Perhaps we may 
 thus in part explain the saying attributed to Antigonus of 
 Socho, that men should serve God without an eye to the 
 reward. The methodizing, codifying impulse which showed 
 itself in the time of Hillel may have arisen partly from the 
 same source, as well as the extraordinary glorification of the 
 Law in the Talmud, according to which God himself was 
 determined by its content J Be this as it may, Pharisaism 
 was practically identical with Judaism. 
 
 1 God, when he would create the world, looked into the Law (Bereshith 
 Rabba, 1), and took counsel with it (Midrash Tanchuma, 1) ; to its study he 
 devotes three hours every day (Aboda Sara, 3 h), and to its prescriptions he 
 conforms himself ( Wayikra Rabba, 19, 35). Weber, " System," 4. This ex-
 
 SIX AND KIGHTEOUSNESS. 253 
 
 The rival sect of the Sadducees never had any strong hold 
 on the people. According to Josephus (Ant. xiii. 10, 6), their 
 adherents were found only among the rich, while the Phar- 
 isees had the multitude on their side ; and so, he adds, the 
 former, when they became magistrates, were forced to adopt 
 Pharisaic notions because the people would listen to noth- 
 ing else (Ant. xviii. 1, 4). The unpopularity of the Saddu- 
 cees was no doubt due in part to the character of their 
 religious ideas. They rejected the authority of the traditional 
 interpretations of the Law, and held themselves strictly to 
 the text of the Pentateuch. 1 This is possibly the explana- 
 tion of their attitude toward the doctrines of immortality 
 and the resurrection, neither of which they accepted (Ant. 
 xviii. 1, 4 ; Matt. xxii. 23 ; Acts xxiii. 8) ; that -is, perhaps 
 they held strictly to the negative position of the Pentateuch. 2 
 But this was out of harmony with the existing views and feel- 
 ing of the people ; popular feeling had advanced beyond the 
 point of view of the Old Testament, and the cold scepticism 
 of the Sadducees was unacceptable. It seems probable also 
 that the social position and culture of the party kept them 
 aloof from the people. Josephus intimates that it was com- 
 posed of aristocrats, and the history shows that it furnished 
 many magistrates and high-priests. This fact has suggested 
 
 uberantly fanciful representation embodies the feeling that the universe is 
 determined by an eternal law, of which God is the personal and the Tora 
 the written expression. 
 
 1 Nevertheless, it must be supposed that they recognized judicial interpre- 
 tations of the Pentateuchal code, which were necessary in order to apply it to 
 particular cases (Jos, Ant. xx, 9, 1). 
 
 2 There is some difficulty in the statements of Josephus that the Saddu- 
 cees believed that souls die with bodies, and of Acts that they accepted neither 
 angel nor spirit. This goes beyond the Pentateuch and the Old Testament 
 generally. Perhaps it is only intended to say that they denied the independent 
 existence of souls and spirits, holding the dead to be confined as " shades " 
 m Sheol. and that they rejected the later post-biblical elaboration of the doc- 
 trine of angels. Otherwise we must ascribe to them a doctrine of annihilation 
 which is allied to the Stoic view. In the absence of preciser information these 
 affirmations must be received with caution.
 
 254 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 the view that the germ of the Sadducean party was formed 
 by the old priestly families, who for a long time enjoyed 
 political and social supremacy and inherited the religious 
 traditions of the tern pie-ceremonial. The priests would nat- 
 urally be a conservative body, holding to the letter of the 
 law and careless of modern innovations of thought. 1 Their 
 position did not bring them into close contact with the peo- 
 ple, and they would have small knowledge of popular needs 
 and small sympathy with popular ideas. On the other hand, 
 their social traditions allied them with the rich and aristo- 
 cratic ; they would easily adopt foreign habits of luxury and 
 social ideas, while they rejected those new conceptions of the 
 Law and those doctrinal interpretations which were neces- 
 sary in order to bring it into living harmony with the new 
 generation. Thus they stood outside the line of national 
 progress, and had small effect on the national thought. They 
 seem to represent a petrified conservatism which is not en- 
 titled to the name of nationalism. They are of no recog- 
 nizable interest in the history of Christian thought. Their 
 activity in Palestine was almost exclusively political up to 
 the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans, when they van- 
 ished from the scene to appear as a party no more. Traces 
 of similar negative opinions may be found in later times, but 
 not of such an organization. 
 
 The third Jewish party, the Essenes, presents character- 
 istics in some respects more remarkable than those of the 
 other two. When it first took distinct shape we do not 
 know ; but as the Essene Manahem was a friend of Herod 
 the Great (Ant. xv. 10, 5), and as the party seems at that 
 time to have been well established, it may be inferred that 
 it arose not later than in the early part of the first century 
 
 1 The name " Sadducees " is most probably identical with " Zadoldtes " 
 (Ezek. xliv. 15), the priestly family which came into control of the temple 
 just before the beginning of the Babylonian exile.
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 255 
 
 B. c. Its members were found in small numbers in various 
 parts of Palestine, including the cities (Jos. War, ii. 8, 4) ; a 
 large community was settled on the northwest coast of the 
 Dead Sea. 1 They represented in the first place an extreme 
 legalism so far as ceremonial purity of body was concerned, 
 and in this point may be regarded as an exaggerated form 
 of Pharisaism. Singularly enough, however, their attitude 
 toward the temple-sacrifices was hostile ; they refused to 
 take part in them. The ground of their repugnance to the 
 national system of offerings seems to have been not that 
 of the prophets and psalmists, it was neither ethical nor 
 spiritual. It perhaps connected itself with their second pecu- 
 liarity, a pronounced asceticism, which reached the propor- 
 tions of gnostic dualism. They abstained from wine, animal 
 food, and oil, and most of them from marriage. They obvi- 
 ously held that the body, as the seat of evil, was to be 
 repressed and chastised. Whence this decidedly non-Jewish 
 view came, it is hard to say ; it has been ascribed to Persian 
 and other Oriental influence, but the data for determining 
 its origin are lacking. Un- Jewish it certainly was, since the 
 nation otherwise never showed any such tendency. The Old 
 Testament heartily accepts and approves the ordinary social 
 life of man ; yet a point of departure for such a system may 
 be found in Old Testament ideas (especially in the concep- 
 tion of the weakness of the flesh, in the Nazarite vow, and 
 the Eechabite life), and traces of asceticism appear in the 
 books of Daniel (i. 8, 12) and Tobit (xii. 8). It is conceiv- 
 able that the Essenian asceticism may have arisen out of 
 
 1 Pliny, Hist. Nat. v. 15. For an account of similar communities in Egypt 
 known as Therapeutic, see Philo, " On the Contemplative Life." According to 
 him, the Essenes represented the practical, and the Therapeuta: (the Healers 
 of Souls) the theoretical side of the deeper, philosophic religious life. Of this 
 Egyptian sect, which may have sprung out of the Jewish-Alexandrine the- 
 osophy, we are unable to trace with distinctness any influence on the suc- 
 ceeding Jewish or Christian development of the first century of our era.
 
 256 SIN AND KIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 this general idea. The turmoils of the time may have led 
 certain persons (there were perhaps five or six thousand in 
 all) to withdraw from the world and seek peace by sup- 
 pressing the body in order to cultivate the soul ; and it was 
 possibly this conviction, that happiness was gained through 
 inward purity, that produced the negative attitude toward 
 sacrifices. 1 Other peculiarities of the party lead us to sus- 
 pect Oriental influence : they practised occult arts, were ac- 
 quainted with medicinal roots and stones, had secret books 
 and mysteries, and made predictions (Jos. Ant. xv. 10, 5, 
 where Manahem foretells the greatness of Herod) ; they 
 practised a sort of sun-worship, and had a special doctrine 
 of angels. So far as their life was concerned, it was of the 
 most exemplary sort ; they were everywhere famous for 
 piety and virtue. 
 
 Though the Essenes did not affect the general national 
 Jewish development, standing as they did outside of its 
 lines of advance, yet it is not likely that they remained en- 
 tirely without influence on current thought. In fact, there 
 are traces in the New Testament of their two distinctive 
 peculiarities, their communistic morality and their gnostic 
 conception of life and of the world. While the supposition 
 that Jesus was an Essene must be pronounced to be base- 
 less and even bizarre, it is not impossible that he may have 
 been attracted by that self-abnegation which the party so 
 strikingly illustrated. The Essenian practices of non-resist- 
 ance and abandonment of claim to private property were 
 doubtless well known in Palestine in the first half of the 
 first century, and may have been sympathized with by many 
 persons. Such ideas, which were in the air, Jesus may have 
 in part adopted in the form in which we find them expressed 
 in the Sermon on the Mount ; but he combined them with 
 
 1 Perhaps also the feeling against the shedding of blood, for which reason 
 probably in part they abstained from animal food.
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 257 
 
 pure spiritual views and vigorous positive morality in such 
 a way as practically to take them out of the circle of Esse- 
 nian doctrine. The only other trace of this party in the New 
 Testament is found in the gnosticism which is combated in 
 the Epistle to the Colossians. The similarity between the 
 Jewish-Christian doctrine there opposed and the Essenian 
 views is striking : x there is the same asceticism and dual- 
 ism and the same prominence given to angels. But it is 
 not certain that the Colossian gnosticism was derived from 
 the Essenes ; it may have come from similar, but independent, 
 movements of thought in Asia Minor. The historical origin 
 of these early forms of gnosticism is not clear ; but it is of 
 great interest to note that similar developments took place 
 in Judaism and in Christianity. And when we consider the 
 wide diffusion of gnostic opinions in the early part of the 
 second century of our era, we are forced to recognize a deep- 
 lying tendency in the Jewish world (perhaps non-Jewish 
 in origin, and numbering comparatively few adherents) to 
 adopt a mystical-philosophic view of the universe, discard- 
 ing both Jewish and Christian nomistic, Messianic, and sac- 
 ficial ideas, undertaking on the one hand to bridge over the 
 chasm between God and the world by a series of inter- 
 mediate intelligences, and on the other hand to lift man 
 into union with God by a process of bodily and spiritual 
 self -culture. The points of contact between this scheme and 
 the Mazdean and Buddhistic conceptions of life cannot be 
 denied ; but in the absence of all proof, it would be rash to 
 affirm an historical connection between the Jewish and the 
 Oriental systems. We can only say that gnostic thought has 
 its basis in human nature, and we need not be surprised at 
 its appearance in Jewish circles. Christian gnosticism may 
 have sprung in part from the Jewish thought, but certainly 
 owed its fullest development to other than Jewish influences. 
 
 1 See J. B. Lightfoot's note in his Commentary on Colossians. 
 17
 
 258 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 Josephus (Ant. xviii. 1, 6) mentions a fourth Jewish party, 
 the Zealots, of which Judas, the Galilean, was the founder, 
 but it was rather political than religious in character. It 
 represented a fanatical nationalism, a rejection of all earthly 
 rulers, an inviolable attachment to liberty, and devotion to 
 the God of Israel as the only Lord. The part played by 
 these men in the revolt against the Romans and the siege 
 of Jerusalem belongs to the civil history. 
 
 The Sanhedrin and the great legal schools, though they 
 were influential in the elaboration of the ethical, civil, and 
 religious law, had little to do with the development of re- 
 ligious doctrine. They were the official representatives and 
 expounders of the national nomism, which they received 
 from their fathers and transmitted to their descendants. 
 The earliest mention of the Sanhedrin occurs in Josephus' 
 account of the reign of John Hyrcanus II. (B. c. 47), where 
 Herod is summoned before this tribunal to account for cer- 
 tain murders committed by him (Ant. xiv. 9, 3-5). It is 
 there spoken of as an established institution, and had doubt- 
 less been in existence for a considerable period, though the 
 beginnings of its history are unknown. There is no proof 
 that it was connected with Ezra ; the form of the name 1 
 points to the Greek period as the time of its origination. 
 It was doubtless a gradual development out of older judi- 
 cial institutions. Its membership consisted of seventy-one 
 priests and scribes ; it had two secretaries, and was presided 
 over by the high-priest. It was the supreme judicial and 
 legislative body, having nominally final jurisdiction in civil 
 and ecclesiastical affairs ; but its power was practically lim- 
 ited by the authority of the Jewish kings and the Roman 
 procurators. 
 
 The best activity of the nation during the Greek period 
 appears in the legal schools. The class of students called 
 
 1 It is the Hebrew or Aramaic form of the Greek
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 259 
 
 Soferim, or Scribes, had arisen in response to the demand for 
 the interpretation and application of the Law. The name is 
 given to Ezra (Ezra vii. 6) ; and there was doubtless, from 
 his day on, a succession of men who devoted themselves to 
 the elaboration of legal science. The study seems, however, 
 not to have been definitely organized until the second cen- 
 tury B. c. At that time there began a line of teachers, each 
 of whom gathered around him a body of disciples and ex- 
 pressed his opinions in the form of apothegms. Most of the 
 sayings of these masters that have been preserved 1 are eth- 
 ical and legal, and have little direct bearing on the history 
 of religious thought. Indirectly, no doubt, their influence 
 was great. The schools cultivated the habit of independent 
 thought, and introduced into religion an ethical element 
 which could not fail to counteract the materializing ten- 
 dency of nomism. So far as there was a scientific devel- 
 opment of thought among the Jews of this period, we find 
 it in the succession of heads of schools. 
 
 The saying attributed to Simon the Just expresses the 
 fundamental idea of Judaism : " On three things the world 
 rests, on the Law, on divine service, and on good works." 
 This is the starting-point of Jewish development proper, 
 absolute obedience to the external divine standard, and along 
 with this kindly deeds toward mankind. It recognizes both 
 the outward law of the code and the inward law of the con- 
 science. Of the same import is the injunction ascribed to 
 the early teachers to " make a hedge about the Law," that 
 is, to enact and enforce minute ceremonial and other pre- 
 scriptions so as to define the Law with precision, and secure 
 its effectiveness. 2 
 
 1 In the tract Pirke Aboth, and in other Talmudic treatises. 
 
 ' 2 There was probably also in some circles a desire to guard the pnrity of 
 the nation by surrounding initiation with difficulties that should deter all but 
 men of serious intention. The horror of heathenism was great, the fear of 
 its seductive influences ever present, and isolation was a familiar idea. The
 
 260 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 The first of the great teachers whose name has come down 
 to us, Autigonus of Socho (second century B. c.), is cred- 
 ited with the remarkable declaration that men should not 
 serve God for reward, that virtue is to spring from love 
 of right, and to be accepted as its own sufficient reward, 
 an utterance which has no parallel in Old Testament or 
 New Testament. According to the tradition, his teaching 
 was understood by some of his scholars as a denial of im- 
 mortality, whence sprung the party of the Sadducees. 1 That 
 this is not a correct account of the origin of that party, we 
 have already seen. But the Sadducees were credited with 
 a leaning to foreigners, and it is possible that we have here 
 a vague reminiscence of fear of the Greek influence in the 
 school of Antigonus. The probability is that Stoic thought 
 was known in Palestine at that time. 2 It is noteworthy 
 that Antigonus seems to have maintained his position in 
 spite of a dictum which was contrary to the Jewish ortho- 
 opposite policy of liberality also found favor, if we may rely on the anecdote 
 which represents Sbammai as repelling would-be proselytes by the severity of 
 his demands, while Hillel summed up the legal requirements for candidates 
 in the golden rule. Shab 31 a, cited by Jost, " Geschichte des Judenthums," 
 I 265. Jost remarks (in note) that this conflict between legalism and moral- 
 ity was afterwards transformed into that between legalism (Peter) and faith 
 (Paul). 
 
 1 The name is said in one tradition to be derived from that of one of these 
 scholars, Zadok, but this is probably an invented etymology ; already in the 
 Talmud these early times of legal study have a legendary coloring. 
 
 2 Its presence in Palestine is not expressly mentioned, but may be inferred 
 from the general prevalence of Greek thought. The intimate relations be- 
 tween Palestine and Egypt, where it is certain that Greek ideas were hos- 
 pitably received by Jews , the Greek translation of the law and the prophets, 
 which gradually made its way into Syria ; the adoption of Greek customs 
 by a part of the Jewish people in the time of Antiochus Epiphanes, these 
 facts point to the presence of Hellenic ideas among the Palestinian Jews as 
 early as the beginning of the second century B. c. That Antigonus of Socho 
 bears a Greek name may be not without significance. Greek culture would 
 naturally bring with it Greek philosophy, Stoic, Platonic, and other sys- 
 tems prevalent at the time. Whether Greek books were then read by Pales- 
 tinian Jews, we have no means of determining ; the documents, absorbed in 
 political and Messianic interests, are unfortunately silent on this point.
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 261 
 
 doxy of the period ; and while we cannot regard him as the 
 founder of the Sadducean party, we may suppose that he 
 represents a direction of opinion which found sympathy and 
 expression in Sadduceism. The Old Testament everywhere 
 connects man's conduct in this life with divine reward and 
 punishment ; but, except in the book of Daniel, it has noth- 
 ing to say of reward and punishment in the future life. A 
 thinker, like Antigonus, especially under the influence of 
 Stoicism, might find the gist of the Old Testament teaching 
 in the doctrine that reverence toward God was the central 
 fact of religious life, and that obedience to him brought not 
 outward prosperity, but that inward satisfaction which con- 
 stituted the highest happiness. How far such an opinion 
 was held by the later Sadducees, we have no means of deter- 
 mining ; our accounts of them come from their enemies. The 
 
 O ' 
 
 Talmudic Pharisees could see no good in men who held aloof 
 from what had come to be regarded as the vital principle 
 of the nation, devotion to the ceremonial law. The Talmud 
 was edited, moreover, long after the Sadducees as a party 
 had ceased to exist. Time had stamped failure on them ; it 
 was not likely that they would receive justice at the hands 
 of their successful opponents. On general grounds, consid- 
 ering the prominent part played by the Sadducees in the 
 civil and ecclesiastical government, it is likely that they 
 numbered in their ranks not a few men of exemplary, moral- 
 religious character, maintaining the Old Testament standard 
 of faith and conduct, but standing necessarily in a position 
 of antagonism toward popular thought. They were probably 
 neither better nor worse than their adversaries. If the his- 
 tory of the times had been written by them, we should no 
 doubt find in their policy and conduct the usual mixture 
 of good and bad ; it was their misfortune that they were out 
 of accord with the Jewish spirit of the age, and vanished, 
 from the scene almost without leaving a trace of influence
 
 262 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 on national opinions. So far as the practical ethics of the 
 time is concerned, it was not determined by the dicta of 
 teachers and schools, but sprang out of the social conditions, 
 to which the Sadducees, no less than the Pharisees, were 
 subject. 
 
 The rivalry between Pharisees and Sadducees is in one 
 aspect a struggle between progressive noniism and conserv- 
 ative nationalism. The question was virtually decided in 
 favor of the party of nomistic advance, in the second cen- 
 tury B. c. In another aspect this party strife connected 
 itself with the conflict between Jewish and foreign ideas. 
 The historical content of the second century has been de- 
 scribed as the victory of noniism over Hellenism. This, 
 however, is a partial statement of the case, true from one 
 point of view, untrue from another. The sharp attack of 
 the Syrian Greeks on the organized Jewish faith was thor- 
 oughly crushed by the Maccabean uprising ; the attempt 
 was not repeated by Greeks or Komans. Yahwe, the Lord, 
 was not displaced by Jupiter Capitolinus. The Jewish sa- 
 cred books were not destroyed. The hold of the Jewish 
 ritual on the national mind was not weakened. Judaism 
 as a religious system remained firm, and Hellenistic hea- 
 thenism suffered a decisive defeat. But this is only the 
 outward aspect of the question. Judaism, while it had an 
 inward life vigorous enough to repel all such attacks, had 
 also a depth and breadth of susceptibility which recognized 
 the value of certain foreign truths. Notably the great be- 
 lief in immortality came to the Jews through Greek inter- 
 mediation. In the Egyptian -Jewish literature there is many 
 a trace of Greek influence in philosophical-religious views 
 of the world and of life, the conceptions, for example, 
 of the divine cosmos, the divine mediating logos, the divine 
 power of human wisdom and virtue. Palestinian nomism 
 was less affected by such ideas ; but in Palestine also we
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 263 
 
 find the doctrine of immortality, and in the legal schools 
 the idea of moral order and individual strict rectitude and 
 justice. All these conceptions passed over to Christianity. 
 From this point of view Hellenism did not suffer a defeat, 
 but succeeded in impressing itself on Judaism. The con- 
 tact between these two great systems of thought is to be 
 looked on rather as an intellectual-religious conference, in 
 which the more firmly organized religion, while maintaining 
 its general character, accepted suggestions from its neigh- 
 bor. Judaism, by virtue of all the elements of its past, had 
 a vigor of constitution and a common-sense practicalness 
 which assured it existence and success in the strife of opin- 
 ions. The strength of Hellenism lay, not in its religious 
 organization, but in its general conceptions of life. Its pan- 
 theon and its, priesthood were doomed to extinction ; but 
 its philosophy was to survive as a permanent element of 
 civilization. The Jews, however, and especially those of Pal- 
 estine, did not express Greek philosophical ideas in techni- 
 cal terms ; the philosophical influence shows itself in the 
 general coloring of the thought. Nor is more than a gen- 
 eral coloring to be expected. The Jewish ethics and religion 
 of the second century B. c. sprang out of old Israelitish soil, 
 and were developed largely by Israelitish experiences. But 
 when we compare the utterances of the great lawyers with 
 the purely national tone of the apocalyptic and historical 
 books, we are naturally led to attribute the broad humanita- 
 rian and cosmopolitan elements of the former to that breath 
 of foreign influence which we have reason to believe was 
 then found in Palestine. 1 By way of illustration we may 
 cite some of the sayings which are attributed to the centres 
 of legal-ethical teaching. 
 
 1 For the extent of Hellenic culture during this period in Palestine, in 
 Judean and non-Judean districts, see Schiirer, " Geschichte des Judischen 
 Volkes," II. pp. 9-50.
 
 264 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 Siinon the Just declared that the world rested on the 
 Tora, on the divine service, and on deeds of kindness or 
 mercy (with possible allusion to Hos. vi. 6, cf. Matt. xii. 7), 
 that is, he puts duty to one's fellow-men on the same level 
 with the obligation to obey the ritual law. The dictum of 
 Antigonus is the exaltation of the pure spirit of devotion to 
 duty : " Be as servants who serve the master without view 
 to reward." The sayings of the succeeding teachers down 
 to Hillel deal exclusively with ethical and legal principles. 
 We cannot conclude from this that they neglected the cere- 
 monial law, but it may fairly be inferred that they laid very 
 great stress on the ideas of justice and probity. The most 
 important of the heads of the legal schools was the Baby- 
 lonian Hillel, who belongs to the reign of Herod the Great, 
 the last third of the century before the beginning of our era. 
 A richly endowed and many-sided man, he left his impress 
 on the national development in more than one direction. As 
 a lawyer, he was famous not only for his great learning, but 
 also for his clearness and analytic power. He arranged the 
 enormous mass of the traditional interpretations of the Law 
 into something like a regular code, and thus laid the founda- 
 tions of the Mishna, and prepared the way for the precise 
 scientific legal study which was to occupy the Jewish mind 
 for the next thousand years. In this way he helped to bind 
 the nation more firmly to the nomistic idea, and to develop 
 more fully all the good and bad that lay in the nomistic 
 scheme of life. On the other hand, his ethical conceptions 
 were characterized by remarkable freedom, breadth, and geni- 
 alness. He and his colleague, Shammai, stood at opposite 
 poles in the construction of the Law; the latter was stern 
 and uncompromising, the former was mild and liberal. It 
 was to a Gentile candidate for proselytism that he is said 
 to have declared that the whole Law was comprised in one 
 word: "What thou wouldst not have another do to thee,
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 265 
 
 do not thou to another." A similar idea is contained in his 
 saying : " Be of the disciples of Aaron, loving and follow- 
 ing after peace, loving mankind and leading them to the 
 Law," where it seems that he regards the Law as the em- 
 bodiment of order informed by kindness and love. Kespect- 
 ing self-seeking he said : " Who seeks fame loses fame ; 
 who does not increase [in learning] decreases ; who does not 
 teach is worthy of death ; who uses the crown [of learn- 
 ing] for his own ends perishes." In enigmatical fashion 
 he expresses the idea of unselfish self-culture : "If I am 
 not for myself, who is for me ? and if I am for myself, what 
 am I ? and if not now, when ? " Here is both ethical strin- 
 gency and philosophical subtlety. 
 
 In his time the Jewish legal system acquired definite con- 
 sistency, and after him no important change seems to have 
 occurred. The great lawyers worked out details, but the 
 national conception of righteousness remained essentially un- 
 modified. Eighteousness was obedience to the Law. We 
 have already noted the vice of this system, mechanical 
 and external self-confidence. But we are not to suppose 
 that formality obtained the entire control of the religious 
 life of the period, that the national conception of life was 
 wholly vicious. We know that the national instinct de- 
 manded inwardness and spirituality of life. With so great 
 a mass of ethical thought as the Jewish nation then pos- 
 sessed, it was impossible that there should not be some trace 
 of higher and purer devotion to right for its own sake. In 
 the person and teaching of Hillel we have the example of 
 such a nobler conception of religion, and there must have 
 been many who shared his views. 1 But it is true at the 
 same time that this better side of the national religious life 
 was not the controlling one ; it was constantly in danger of 
 
 1 On Hillel see Jost, " Geschichte," I. 257 ff ., art. in Herzog, and Delitzsch's 
 monograph.
 
 266 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 being overborne by the ceremonialism which tended to de- 
 press or to crush the spiritual independence and freedom 
 of the souL The Law offered a great religious career to the 
 Jewish people, but only on the condition that along with 
 this external guide there should be also the recognition of 
 the conscience as a divinely enlightened source of truth, 
 that the impulse to right-living should spring not merely 
 from a desire to keep the mass of precepts, but also from 
 an inward perception and love of divine truth. Hillel had 
 perceived the necessity of a freer element in the religious 
 life, but he had not been able to lift it into a position of 
 control. There was needed a more piercing insight and a 
 more lofty spirituality to convert Jewish nomism into a true 
 spiritual life. 
 
 6. It cannot be considered an accident that Jesus of Naza- 
 reth and Hillel stand historically so near together. We see 
 in the latter the germ of the religious feeling to which the 
 former gave full shape. The peculiarity of the position of 
 Jesus as religious teacher was not that he rejected the na- 
 tional nomistic scheme, but that he sought to infuse into 
 it the vitalizing principle of independent communion with 
 God. 
 
 It appears from the Synoptic narratives that Jesus recog- 
 nized and accepted the national system of sacrifices and the 
 national law. Lepers whom he healed he sent to make the 
 offering prescribed by law (Matt. viii. 4) ; he kept the regu- 
 lar feasts (Matt. xxvi. 17) ; and according to the First Gos- 
 pel (Matt, xxiii. 2, 3), he declared that the scribes and the 
 Pharisees were authorized expounders of the Mosaic law, 
 and that their prescriptions were to be obeyed. We must 
 therefore conclude that he accepted in full the Mosaic law, 
 with the rest of the Old Testament, as the divinely given 
 guide of life. We need not lay stress on the declaration of 
 Matt. v. 19 : " Whosoever, therefore, shall break one of these
 
 SIN AND KIGHTEOUSNESS. 267 
 
 least commandments and shall teach men so, shall be called 
 least in the kingdom of heaven, but whosoever shall do 
 and teach them, he shall be called great in the kingdom 
 of heaven." From the generally admitted Judaizing char- 
 acter of this Gospel, it is not impossible that these words 
 were added by an editor in the time of conflict between the 
 Pauline and Judaizing parties of the Church, yet there is 
 nothing in the other Synoptics in contradiction of this decla- 
 ration ; it is not the Law, but its abuse, that he condemns. 
 It is quite in accordance with the Synoptic portraiture of 
 him that he should say : " Think not that I came to de- 
 stroy the Law or the prophets ; I came not to destroy, but 
 to fulfil" (v. 17). And if he looked on the Old Testament 
 as the final divine revelation of truth, he might well add : 
 " Till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle shall 
 in no wise pass away from the Law till all things be accom- 
 plished" (v. 18). He seems, indeed, in the Sermon on the 
 Mount, to criticise and modify the Law in certain partic- 
 ulars. The modifications, however, when we examine them 
 closely, are, with perhaps one exception, not an attack on 
 the fundamental principles of the Old Testament. When 
 he declares against the habit of swearing, on the ground that 
 it is irreverent and unnecessary, this does not impugn the 
 moral principle of the Old Testament, which required the 
 performance of oaths made to the Lord ; it is rather the 
 utterance of a more developed religious feeling, which per- 
 ceives the inutility of primitive modes of religious service. 
 So, also, his command not to resist evil is directed against 
 the legal prescription : " An eye for an eye and a tooth for 
 a tooth." But in the old legislation this was rather a rule 
 for the guidance of the judges than an ethical precept ; it 
 was a survival of the old system of retaliation, which was 
 no doubt modified by the Jewish judges themselves. He, 
 however, makes it the occasion for affirming the general eth-
 
 268 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 ical principle intended to strike at the root of a purely self- 
 ish assertion of one's legal rights. In his injunction to love 
 one's enemies he no doubt not only advances beyond the Old 
 Testament point of view, but also distinctly condemns that 
 hatred of national enemies which is involved in all the Old 
 Testament ethics and is distinctly avowed in the prophetic 
 writings and the Psalms. But these criticisms, whatever 
 their import, are not to be construed as implying a rejec- 
 tion of the Law as the guide of life. There is no hint in 
 the Synoptics that he ever called in question its supreme 
 obligation and authority. He attacked the traditions of the 
 Pharisees, but never the text on which they were based ; 
 and his hostility seems to have been directed not against 
 the serious injunctions of the traditional law (Matt, xxiii. 3), 
 but against those trifling observances which interfered with 
 the free moral conduct of life. 
 
 It must be held, therefore, that his conception of righteous- 
 ness was nomistic in so far as it was conceived of by him as 
 obedience to law. The precepts which he gave were intended, 
 not to set aside, but to expound and develop, the existing 
 legal system. He contemplated no fundamental change in 
 the national life ; of such an idea there is no trace in the 
 three first Gospels. As far as we can judge, his hope for the 
 nation was that it should continue under the Law, only with 
 a higher spirit of obedience, such as that which is not dimly 
 expressed by the prophets Jeremiah and Ezekiel, and comes 
 out still more clearly in the One Hundred and Nineteenth 
 Psalm. But it is precisely at this point that his conception 
 of righteousness assumes a peculiar and revolutionary tone. 
 His ethical precepts do not express the essence of his idea 
 of religion. That is found in what he represents as the ideal 
 attitude of the soul toward God. He speaks, indeed, of a 
 higher reward for the better spiritual service (Matt. vi. 1, 15 
 20, 33), a consideration which, though not, strictly speaking,
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 269 
 
 of the highest ethical character, is perfectly legitimate. But 
 he also holds up the divine father of men as the standard 
 of human conduct, and represents the desire to be in perfect 
 harmony with him as the highest motive of life : " That ye 
 may be sons of your father who is in heaven " (Matt. v. 45). 
 The very conception of God as father implies a tenderness 
 of sympathy and a spirituality of relation which involved a 
 new departure in religion. It amounts practically to trans- 
 ferring the devotion of the soul from the outward objective 
 standard of law, and making the conscience itself, enlight- 
 ened, freed, and stimulated by devotion to a perfect ideal, 
 the arbiter of moral life. 
 
 The source of this spiritual righteousness he finds in the 
 soul itself. His exhortations are all addressed directly to 
 man's will, for which he assumes complete independence and 
 responsibility. He speaks of no mediator between God and 
 man, describes no theological process by which righteous- 
 ness is to be obtained. He pictures man as standing face to 
 face with God and dealing with him alone. The necessary 
 condition of true righteousness is that man should come 
 into a relation of trust and love with the divine father, but 
 this relation is attained by man's own effort. The religious 
 teaching of Jesus may therefore be termed a spiritual no- 
 mism, a principle which contained the germ of the destruction 
 of formalism, though the latter has always maintained itself 
 in the Church from the failure fully to appropriate the real 
 spirit of Jesus. The early Church, if we may take the Epis- 
 tle of James to be a fair exposition of its belief, did not 
 grasp the spirituality of the Master's conception. The right- 
 eousness described in this Epistle is marked rather by sin- 
 cerity than by high spirituality. What the writer opposes is 
 false pretence, disregard of the poor, evil-speaking, jealousy, 
 pride, luxury. So far as regards the source of righteousness, 
 it is in general that of the Old Testament and of the Sermon
 
 270 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 on the Mount. A spiritual sonship is recognized : " Of his 
 own will he brought us forth by the word of truth, that we 
 should be a kind of first-fruits of his creatures" (i. 18). On 
 the other hand, he throughout regards men as the shapers 
 of their own moral characters, and has nothing to say of a 
 divine transforming power, or of a mediator between God 
 and man. For him, true religion consists in deeds of charity 
 to the afflicted and freedom from worldly impurities (i 27). 
 One may receive wisdom from God if one ask in faith ; one 
 is tempted, not by God nor by Satan, but by one's own evil 
 desire. A sinner may be converted from the error of his 
 way and thereby saved from death by his fellow-man (v. 20). 
 It is the conscience that determines moral guilt : " To him 
 who knows how to do good and does it not, to him it is sin " 
 (iv. 17). The relation of Jesus Christ to man's righteousness 
 is scarcely touched on. He was believed in as the Messiah 
 and the Lord, as the source of wisdom and of health of body 
 and mind, and his speedy coming was to be waited for as the 
 consummation of things. This is apparently the essence of 
 the faith which the believer is to exercise toward Jesus, 
 acceptance of him as the Messiah with faithful obedience to 
 all his precepts. Any other kind of faith the writer rejects 
 with contempt, and indeed appears to make an argument 
 against Paul's conception of the nature and office of faith 
 without works. Such a faith, he says, is dead, is nothing 
 more than what demons possess, is in opposition to the 
 Old Testament teaching, according to which Abraham was 
 justified by works. It is obviously the abuse of the Pauline 
 doctrine against which the writer is here arguing ; but it is 
 also clear that he himself rejects that doctrine, and looks on 
 a sincere life of thought and deed as the righteousness which 
 is acceptable in the sight of God. This conception does not 
 differ from that of the better Jewish thinkers of the day, 
 as indeed the Jewish portion of the early Church was little
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 271 
 
 more than a section of Judaism which regarded Jesus of 
 Nazareth as the Messiah. 
 
 A radical change in the conception of righteousness was 
 introduced by the Apostle Paul, a man who combined in 
 his thought spiritual depth and mystical school-logic in so 
 remarkable a manner that we are at a loss to estimate the 
 bearing and influence of his ideas. He was led by his ex- 
 perience to reject the possibility of obtaining righteousness 
 through obedience to an outward law. A profoundly re- 
 ligious nature, passionately devoted to his ideal of perfect- 
 ness, and at the same time keenly introspective, he became 
 convinced, soon after (or perhaps before) his acceptance of 
 Jesus as the Messiah, of the futility of man's efforts to 
 achieve perfect righteousness. This is a conclusion which 
 must be reached in a measure by every earnest soul. In 
 Paul's case, the weariness of human works was intensified 
 by the Jewish ceremonial system and the huge mass of 
 scribal ordinances under which he had been brought up. 
 He describes it as a terrible burden and bondage, a bur- 
 den imposed by God himself, indeed, for a wise purpose 
 (namely, to develop man's consciousness of sin), but in itself 
 inconsistent with liberty of soul and peace of mind (Gal. 
 iii. iv. ; Eom. vii.). He had struggled long to satisfy the 
 demands of law, and the only result was that he was over- 
 whelmed with the bitterest sense of his own moral impo- 
 tency ; yet righteousness was an absolute necessity. What, 
 then, was man to do ? How was salvation possible ? It 
 seemed to Paul that the perfect righteousness was to be 
 prepared and bestowed by God himself. It could not be 
 of man's working out ; it must be achieved by a perfect 
 being to whom God had assigned the task of saving human- 
 ity, and this perfect saviour could be none other than the 
 glorified Messiah, Jesus of Nazareth. It is precisely at this 
 point that we wish to know the development in Paul's mind
 
 272 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 of his conception of Jesus ; but unfortunately specific his- 
 torical data for this purpose are lacking. He speaks much 
 of his experience in certain points, but his knowledge of 
 Christ he represents as an immediate revelation, and he 
 gives us no details of the mental process by which the per- 
 son of the Messiah was brought into connection with his 
 consciousness of sin. 
 
 Paul's idea, though conceived and developed in an origi- 
 nal and thorough manner, is not antagonistic or alien to 
 the thought of the time ; it has connections with both the 
 preceding and the succeeding Jewish literature. The prin- 
 ciple of national and social solidarity had never lost its 
 hold on the people ; some of its cruder features had been 
 cast away (see above, pp. 184 f.), but the essence of the 
 thing had remained In the Old Testament, society is con- 
 ceived of as a unit in such a way that its good element 
 may set aside the evil, and gain the divine favor for the 
 whole. In a number of particular instances the merits of 
 the righteous are spoken of as transferable to others : Job 
 secures forgiveness for his friends (Job xlii.) ; Abraham, by 
 his personal interest with Yahwe, gains the promise that 
 Sodom shall be spared for the sake of ten righteous men, if 
 so many can be found in the city (Gen. xviii.) ; 1 for his sake 
 Abimelech is pardoned and Isaac blessed (Gen. xx. xxvi.). 
 The completest statement of the idea is found in Isaiah liii., 
 where the Servant of Yahwe by his suffering and knowl- 
 edge 2 that is, in general by his merit "justifies many," 
 causes the nation to be esteemed righteous by God. Noth- 
 ing is here said expressly of an imputation of moral char- 
 acter, but some such transference is involved. It is declared 
 
 1 See, on the other hand, Ezek. xiv. 12-20; hut the idea remained (as 
 appears from the Talmud) in spite of the prophet's protest. 
 
 2 The precise construction and meaning of the Hebrew word so rendered 
 are doubtful ; but this does not affect the general sense.
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 273 
 
 that a certain person designated as " the righteous one " pro- 
 cures that other persons shall be pronounced righteous in the 
 divine court. 1 Virtually, therefore, recreant Israel is justified, 
 not by its own righteousness, but through the righteousness 
 of the faithful Servant. The same general idea finds expres- 
 sion in some Apocryphal books (Ecclus. xliv. 11, 12, 19-21 ; 
 Song of the Three Children, 12), and in the New Testa- 
 ment, in the form of intercession, in James v. 16 (cf. Luke 
 xxii. 32). The Talmud develops the idea of the transference 
 of merit and imputation of righteousness in a remarkable 
 manner. A great role in the history of the nation is as- 
 cribed to that righteousness of Abraham and others which 
 had procured them favor with God and influence in his coun- 
 cils, while to the righteous is assigned an almost unlimited 
 power. In one passage (Succa 39) it is affirmed that "the 
 merit of the righteous is able to free the whole world from 
 condemnation," and another (Ber. lOb) ventures the sweep- 
 ing assertion that in general it is desirable "to rest one's 
 hopes on the merits of others." 2 
 
 It would thus seem probable that the notion of the im- 
 putation or legal transference of moral character and its 
 merits or rewards was not strange to Paul's generation, es- 
 pecially not to that Pharisaic school to which he belonged. 
 How the Jewish thought harmonized this idea with the 
 principle of individual moral independence and responsi- 
 bility does not appear, but it is clear that the harmon- 
 ization was effected. Paul, we may imagine, could not be 
 content with a vague theory of the vicarious efficacy of 
 merely human righteousness ; his sense of sin was too deep. 
 The peculiarity of his system is his recognition of the 
 righteousness of the Messiah as the one only moral gar- 
 
 1 The verb rendered " justify, make righteous," is a forensic term, mean- 
 ing " to pronounce righteous." 
 
 2 On the doctrine of the Talmud see Weber, " System," chs xix. xx. 
 
 18
 
 274 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 merit which by reason of its perfectness could clothe all 
 humanity with legal purity. In his principle of imputation 
 he is at one with the Old Testament, and especially with 
 that later development of Old Testament ideas which is 
 found in the Talmud ; he differs from both in the depth 
 and fulness of his moral demands. How he came to his 
 special view it is impossible to say with definiteness. It 
 was most likely an intuition, an idea that burst up in 
 his soul out of the mass of material over which he had 
 been brooding ; he describes it as a revelation. It brought 
 him unity, order, light, where before all had been darkness 
 and chaos. It may have been that profound prophetic vision 
 of the suffering Servant of the Lord (which he doubtless 
 interpreted Messianically) that led him to connect salvation 
 with the Messiah's righteousness ; 1 and it seems to have 
 been in connection with his acceptance of Jesus as the 
 Christ that he perfected his exalted conception of the Mes- 
 siah's nature and function. He seems to have had little 
 knowledge of the earthly life of Jesus, and for this reason, 
 perhaps, the more readily idealized him into the absolutely 
 perfect Servant of the Lord. He had disappeared from 
 earth, where could he be but at God's right hand ? The 
 disciples had their hopes, but Paul, convinced that he was 
 the true Messiah of God, accepting him as the risen and 
 glorified Lord, was unable to rest in the early Church's lim- 
 ited and undefined idea of the Messiah's moral-spiritual 
 functions. He could not restrict the promised salvation 
 to a political deliverance of the nation, or to a vague hap- 
 piness to be bestowed at the second coming of the Christ. 
 He looked for a speedy second coming (Thess., 1 Cor. xv.), 
 but he demanded a present deliverance. His moral con- 
 sciousness assured him that the Messiah had achieved abso- 
 
 1 His expression for " justify " is the Greek rendering of the Hebrew 
 forensic verb mentioned above.
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 275 
 
 lute deliverance from the burden of sin ; for this, he held, 
 was the only true deliverance which the holy God could 
 offer to sin-burdened men. Jesus was perfect ; and his per- 
 fect righteousness offered man that ideal perfectness with- 
 out which the awakened conscience could not be satisfied. 
 
 He found also in the Old Testament the hint of the 
 instrumentality by which the righteousness of the Messiah 
 was to be appropriated. It is said (Gen. xv. 6) that Abra- 
 ham's faith was reckoned to him for righteousness. It is 
 clear from the connection that this act of belief is here 
 represented as part of Abraham's personal righteousness, 
 not an appropriation by him of the righteousness of another. 
 But Paul applies the words without further explanation, 
 and out of their proper sense, to the attitude of the be- 
 liever toward Christ. There is, indeed, a profound spirit- 
 ual truth in this conception, as will be pointed out below. 
 But Paul takes it, in the first instance (Gal., Born.), in a lit- 
 eral and somewhat mechanical way, and develops its conse- 
 quences with unsparing logic. By faith in Christ, he says 
 (and this faith must be regarded as having a moral-spiritual 
 basis, including desire to be freed from sin), the believer is 
 clothed with his perfect righteousness, stands therefore as 
 just in the sight of God, and for him there can be no con- 
 demnation ; he has fulfilled all the divine commands. It 
 follows that man's personal righteousness has no share in 
 effecting his salvation. Whatever its purity and sincerity, it 
 can never be perfect, and is moreover excluded by the very 
 fact that it is the righteousness of Christ which God accepts 
 and puts to the credit of those that believe in him. There 
 is absolutely no place for human goodness in the divine 
 decision respecting man's justification or condemnation. 
 
 This doctrine, which is peculiar to Paul, naturally excited 
 grave doubts and opposition, a trace of which we find in 
 the Epistle of James. It was, indeed, theoretically anti-
 
 276 SIN AND EIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 nomiauism of the most thoroughgoing sort. It was an un- 
 sparing attack on the Jewish national nomistic scheme of 
 life. It was said by objectors (Eom. vi.) that it necessarily 
 led to license, as indeed it may well have done when em- 
 braced by ignorant, unspiritual, or unconscientious persons. 
 If obedience to law availed nothing for salvation, why, it 
 micrht be asked, should one be obedient ? 
 
 O ' 
 
 Paul's reply to this objection gives him occasion to bring 
 out the profoundly spiritual side of his plan of salvation. It 
 is true, he says (Rom. vi. vii.) that the believer is absolved 
 absolutely from obedience to the law, but only under the 
 condition that in accepting Jesus Christ as Saviour he dies 
 to sin ; the old sin-enslaved nature is crucified w r ith Jesus on 
 the cross, the believer is buried with him through baptism 
 into death, and rises with him in newness of life. In the 
 act of believing, the man is introduced into a new world, 
 with transformation of desire and will : he has no longer 
 any wish to do what is contrary to the divine will ; there 
 is a living spring of purity and obedience in his heart. 
 How is it possible that he should continue in sin, which 
 has become distasteful to him ? There were some who sup- 
 posed-that reliance on God's grace for salvation would make 
 men arrogant and defiant, that, having a pledge of sal- 
 vation from God, they would with devilish ingenuity and 
 malignity give free rein to their passions, wallow in sin 
 that they might test the stability of God's word and of his 
 power to save. But no, cries the Apostle, indignantly ; such 
 a thing is impossible ; the existence of such a desire would 
 show the absence of true faith. He who believes not only 
 has no desire to sin, but has intense desire to do what is 
 pleasing in the sight of God, and performs from an inward 
 impulse of love and with gladness of soul what other men 
 wearily toil over, urged on by a mechanical and commercial 
 hope of salvation.
 
 SIN AND KIGHTEOUSNESS. 277 
 
 Paul does not develop in detail the way in which this 
 transformation of soul is accomplished, but we may gather 
 his idea with sufficient distinctness from the Epistles to the 
 Galatians, the Corinthians, and the Eomans. In the first 
 place, faith for him is not a mere intellectual belief that 
 Jesus of Nazareth is the Messiah and the Saviour. It is a 
 confiding, loving attitude of the soul toward God and Christ, 
 a completely sympathetic acceptance of the divine nature 
 as the object not only of affectionate reverence, but also of 
 intimate communion, whence results an appropriation of and 
 assimilation to this divine nature : " As many of you as have 
 been baptized into Christ have put on Christ" (Gal. iii. 27); 
 " If we have become united with him by the likeness of his 
 death, we shall be also by the likeness of his resurrection " 
 (Eom. vi. 5). It is here left undetermined how this perfect 
 assimilation to the perfect character of Jesus is effected, 
 whether by the experience of the human soul or by an im- 
 mediate divine intervention, or by both. But it is clear 
 from the Apostle's description of his own experience (as in 
 Kom. vii.) that he conceived of it on the human side as a 
 radical psychological process, the basis of which was desire 
 to be free from the mastery of sin, and the culmination of 
 which was the establishment of a hearty and intimate friend- 
 ship with God. It is here that Paul shows his deep insight 
 into human nature. Such friendship could not exist while 
 the heart was full of dread of God as a judge who unsparingly 
 required complete obedience to his minutest commands ; such 
 a relation (and this the exaggerated Jewish nomism was) con- 
 verted man into an anxious, toiling slave. But now through 
 Christ the fear of failure in obedience was done away with, 
 and the soul, reconciled to God (2 Cor. v. 19), might lift itself 
 into a free and frank communion with his goodness. 
 
 It was thus the power of an ideal to which Paul appealed. 
 His experience and his reflection led him to see that the
 
 278 SIN AND EIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 mightiest instrument for the transformation of character was 
 the hearty devotion of the soul to a supreme model of truth 
 and holiness; and so he trusts confidently to the power of 
 faith to reorganize and perfect man's nature. This is the 
 highest development of the individual, when he is governed 
 not by a set of minute rules (as was the case in the extreme 
 nomistic scheme), but by his love for an object which in- 
 cluded in itself all good. Thus man might attain to that 
 sense of freedom in which the Apostle revels (Gal. iv. v.), 
 full liberty to follow his own impulses, knowing that these 
 can be nothing but pure, inasmuch as they are called into 
 being by an absolutely pure object. This view furnished 
 the necessary complement to the legal scheme. Obedience 
 to law was indispensable, 1 but it could be secured only by 
 love of the deeper principles of law and of the law-giver. 
 This part of Paul's conception is contained gerrninally in 
 the Old Testament (as in Ps. cxix.), and more definitely in 
 the Wisdom of Solomon, in which (chs. vii.-ix.) wisdom is 
 really a divine ideal, the breath of the power of God, the 
 brightness of the everlasting light, acquainted with the mys- 
 teries of the knowledge of God, and man's guide into all 
 things pure and noble. It is contained substantially in the 
 word of Jesus : " Ye shall be perfect, as your heavenly Father 
 
 1 In the Apostle's system the theoretical freedom of the believer is prac- 
 tically controlled in its judgments by the content of the divinely revealed 
 ethical law. The truthfulness of the conscience is tested by its conformity 
 to the existing standard. License is condemned on its face as antigodly. 
 Christian liberty is deliverance from the dogma that salvation is wrought 
 out by obedience, that is, from external ecclesiasticism , salvation is not 
 in the Church, but in Christ. The obligation to keep the moral law remains ; 
 the obligation of the ceremonial law falls away of itself. Such is the dis- 
 tinction that runs through Paul's writings. He assumes, he does not dis- 
 cuss, the eternal significance of ethical principle. This was assumed no less 
 by the Jews, his opponents. Neither party felt called on to establish this 
 universally recognized fact. The conflict was over the ritual law; but it 
 carried with it the deeper question of the relation between spiritual freedom 
 and the perfection of the soul.
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 279 
 
 is perfect " (Matt. v. 48). But Paul gave it greater definite- 
 ness, and it may be said more effectiveness, by identifying 
 it with the more definite person of Jesus and connecting it 
 with his position as redeemer of man. 
 
 From another point of view he connects this inward trans- 
 formation with the presence and indwelling of God in the 
 soul, whereby the spiritual life is called into existence : " God 
 has sent the spirit of his son into our hearts, crying, Abba, 
 Father " (Gal. iv. 6) ; " Know ye not that ye are a temple 
 of God, and that the spirit of God dwelleth in you " (1 Cor. 
 iii. 16); "We all, with unveiled face reflecting as a mirror 
 the glory of the Lord, are transformed into the same image 
 from glory to glory even as from the Lord, the spirit " (2 Cor. 
 iii. 18) ; " Ye are not in the flesh, but in the spirit, if so be 
 that the spirit of God dwelleth in you" (Rom. viii. 9). Paul 
 thus seems to regard the whole process of inward salvation 
 as a supernatural one. Compare the conception in Wisdom 
 of Solomon ix. 17, 18 : " Thy counsel who has known, except 
 thou give wisdom and send thy holy spirit from above ? For 
 so the ways of them which lived on the earth were reformed, 
 and' men were taught the things that are pleasing to thee, 
 and were saved through wisdom." The Apostle does not ex- 
 hibit in a systematic way the relation between the work of 
 the spirit, the work of the Christ, and the faith of the be- 
 liever. But his view seems to be that the divine spirit is 
 imparted when the man believes. It is in fact simply the 
 Old Testament doctrine of God's universal creative activity 
 which he here adopts : nothing is done except by the divine 
 power, and the spirit is the representative and instrument 
 of the divine influence on the soul. In like manner, Paul 
 adopts the Old Testament conception of God's predeter- 
 mination (Rom. viii. 28-30), which in the thought of that 
 time was merely a necessary part of the idea of God's abso- 
 lute control of the world.
 
 280 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 The instrument or condition of man's salvation, in Paul's 
 view, is the death of Christ : men are justified by his blood, 
 saved from wrath through him, reconciled to God through 
 his death (Rom. v.). God condemned sin in the flesh by 
 sending his own son in the likeness of sinful flesh and as 
 an offering for sin (Rom. viii. 3). This representation of the 
 Messiah as a sacrifice for sin originated, as far as our infor- 
 mation goes, with Paul ; it is not found in the words of 
 Jesus, nor in .the speech of Stephen, nor in the Epistle of 
 James. Its germ may be found perhaps in Isaiah liii., a 
 passage which was early regarded by the Jews as Messianic 
 (Targum of Jonathan, cf. Acts viii. 32, 33), though the idea 
 of an atoning death seems not to have entered into the cur- 
 rent Jewish theory of the Messiah. 1 Paul doubtless reached 
 his position by the combination of the two ideas that the 
 Messiah was to achieve complete salvation, and that there 
 could be no salvation without offering for sin ; yet it is to 
 be noted that he lays comparatively little stress on the death 
 of Christ, and in general on his humanity (Gal. iv. 4). He 
 accepts the atoning death as a necessary condition of sal- 
 vation, but looks with preference to the risen Saviour, whose 
 present glory was both the type and the pledge of the su- 
 preme blessedness reserved by God for the believer : " If we 
 died with Christ, we believe that we shall also live with 
 him, knowing that Christ, being raised from the dead, dies 
 
 1 Weber, " System," cap. xxii. The Targum of Jonathan does not see in 
 Isa. liii. the vicarious suffering, but only the intercession of the Messiah. 
 The later Jewish theology, perhaps under the pressure of Christian doc- 
 trine, evoked a subsidiaiy Messiah, an Ephraimite, whose death was to have 
 atoning efficacy. But of such a role for a Messiah there is no trace in the 
 existing pre-Christian Jewish literature. It is natural to suppose that it was 
 the deep sense of the sinfulness of sin that forced the idea on the mind of 
 Paul ; it was for him and for that age the profoundest explanation of the 
 death of the Messiah. An historical connection might be sought between 
 this view and the old-Semitic conception of the death of the man-God (as 
 in the Adonis-cult). If this latter conception was a familiar one in the first 
 century of our era, it may have helped to shape the Christian doctrine.
 
 SIN AND KIGHTEOUSNESS. 281 
 
 no more, death no more has dominion over him. The death 
 that he died, he died to sin once for all, but the life that he 
 lives, he lives to God ; even so reckon ye also yourselves to 
 be dead to sin, but alive to God in Christ Jesus " (Rom. vi. 
 8-11, cf. iv. 25, Phil. iii. 10). It was the living Jesus to 
 whom he looked as the source of spiritual life, and he could 
 call his preaching the gospel of the resurrection. 
 
 We may sum up Paul's doctrine of saving righteousness 
 as follows : its legal condition is the sacrificial death of Jesus 
 Christ ; its ethical content is the personal righteousness of 
 Christ ; its source is the power of the living, glorified Christ 
 committed to him by God and exercised through the spirit ; 
 its human condition is the humble and grateful recognition 
 of Jesus as the perfect ideal, through whose presence the 
 soul is transformed. Thus we may see the difference be- 
 tween Paul's teaching and that of Jesus : for the latter, the 
 ideal is God ; for the former, Jesus as the glorified son of 
 God. The latter accepts man's personal righteousness, only 
 purified by spirituality ; the former rejects human righteous- 
 ness, which seems to him necessarily impure, and substitutes 
 for it perfect righteousness of the Christ, with the condition 
 that the soul in the act of believing is quickened into free, 
 ethical activity. Jesus thinks of an inward transformation 
 wrought by the communion between man's will and God's ; 
 Paul demands a new divine creation. Jesus brings the soul 
 face to face with God ; Paul interposes the person of the 
 Christ as reconciler. 
 
 The subsequent development of the idea of righteousness 
 in the Pauline school variously combines the elements of 
 Paul's thought. The Epistle to the Ephesians represents the 
 sacrificial death of Christ as the cause of the reconciliation 
 of God and man (ii. 13 ; v. 2 ; ii. 1G) ; believers are raised 
 with him (ii. 6), and he dwells in their hearts through faith 
 (iii. 17) ; the new inward nature of man is created by God in
 
 282 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 righteousness and holiness (iv. 24), and Christ is the ethical 
 standard of growth (iv. 13) ; salvation is not of works, but 
 the believer is created in Christ Jesus for good works (ii. 9, 
 10). We here recognize the essential points of Paul's doc- 
 trine, without the systematic development which he gives. 
 Faith secures to the believer the benefits of Christ's death, 
 and there is the Pauline indefiniteness as to the precise re- 
 lation between the function of this death and the trans- 
 forming power of God. Substantially the same view is given 
 in Colossians. Believers die with Christ (ii. 20), are raised 
 with him (iii. 1), their life is hid with him in God (iii. 3). 
 A modified view of the effect of Christ's sufferings is given 
 (i 24) by the statement that believers fill up by their own 
 afflictions what is lacking in the afflictions of Christ. The 
 conception is that the earthly life of Jesus, with all its ele- 
 ments, is the ground of the salvation which he accomplished ; 
 the significance of his death as a single act becomes thus rel- 
 atively less important. In the conception of salvation stress 
 is laid on the inward transformation of soul and union with 
 Christ, and faith does not play the prominent part which 
 Paul assigns it. Though Christ is said to blot out the legal 
 ordinances which are hostile to the soul (ii. 14), yet we find 
 no trace of Paul's thoroughgoing rejection of law and works. 
 Very similar is the idea of righteousness given in the First 
 Epistle of Peter (i. 19 ; ii. 24 ; i. 3 ; iii. 21 ; iv. 1, 13) ; but 
 in declaring that believers are priests whose sacrifices are 
 acceptable through Christ (ii. 5), and that they purify their 
 souls in obedience to the truth (i. 22), the author withdraws 
 from Paul's technical position, regarding righteousness rather 
 as the act of the soul, though its possibility is conditioned 
 on the death and resurrection of Christ. 
 
 Still farther removed from the Pauline point of view is 
 the position of the Epistle to the Hebrews, whose doctrine 
 is substantially that of the Old Testament with certain
 
 SIN AND EIGHTEOUSNESS. 283 
 
 modifications of detail. Christ, as offering and priest, is 
 the author of salvation (v. 9) ; he is intercessor (vii. 25), the 
 mediator of the new covenant (viii. 6 ; xii. 24), and attained 
 his position at the right hand of God by despising the shame 
 and enduring the suffering of his earthly life (xii. 2, 3). 
 Faith is not belief in Christ whereby we are freed from 
 the Law, but confidence toward God (vi. 1 ; x. 23, 36-39 ; 
 xi.), the Old Testament scheme of righteousness, with 
 the substitution of Jesus Christ for the old sacrifices and 
 priesthood. 
 
 The First Epistle to Timothy, while it regards Christ as 
 Saviour (i. 15 ; ii. 5, 6), takes a distinctly un-Pauline view 
 of the law, which it regards as good and necessary in itself 
 if it be used lawfully (i. 8), and made not for the righteous, 
 but for the wicked ; that is, the law furnishes the standard 
 of moral conduct, being herein identical with the "sound 
 doctrine" of the Gospel. 1 Its more universalistic view is 
 shown not only by its ignoring the idea of the imputation 
 of Christ's righteousness, and laying stress on man's own 
 moral effort, but also by its representation of God as the 
 Saviour of all men (ii. 3 ; iv. 10). Second Timothy, an earlier 
 production, has substantially the same view as First Peter 
 (i. 10 ; ii. 11; iii. 15), and Titus approaches nearer the Paul- 
 ine type by the rejection of works as the ground of salvation 
 (ii. 11, 14; iii. 4-7). 
 
 The Fourth Gospel, ignoring the details of human eth- 
 ical effort, conceives of righteousness as a necessary accom- 
 paniment of entrance into the world of light. The historical 
 condition of this entrance is the sacrificial death of Christ 
 (i. 29) and faith in him and in God (iii. 16 ; v. 24). He 
 frees from sin (viii. 26) ; life is the abiding in him (xv. 4) ; 
 
 1 Paul also regards the moral law as good in itself (Rom. ii. vii.), but treats 
 it as helpless and obstructive, so far as regards salvation (vii. 9), while for 
 First Timothy it is a normal and beneficial element of religious life.
 
 284 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 sin is the rejection of him (xvi. 8). At the same time, it 
 is a new birth of the soul which ushers one into the king- 
 dom of God (iii. 3, 5). It is the divine interposition which 
 divides mankind into the two masses of light and darkness ; 
 and while it is declared that they who do truth come to 
 the light (iii. 21), yet they only can come whom God leads. 
 Righteousness means the possession of the light-nature, which 
 manifests itself by the acceptance of Jesus as the Son of God, 
 the spiritual food and drink of man, the only way to God, 
 the absolute truth, the essential life. The same conception 
 of union with Christ as the source of righteousness is found 
 in the First Epistle of John (iii. 6). The Epistle, however, 
 emphasizes the human activity more than the Gospel : for- 
 giveness is obtained by confession (i 9), and the world is 
 overcome by the love of God (ii. 12-17). 
 
 This conception of righteousness connects itself with that 
 view of the world which in the prologue to the Fourth Gos- 
 pel has the Logos for its centre and explanation. The world 
 had been created through the divine Word ; yet it lay in 
 darkness, the darkness of sin, the origin of which is not ex- 
 plained. The world was his own, yet it knew him not. The 
 reign of the Jewish Law belonged also to the period of dark- 
 ness ; the darkness was dispelled by the manifestation of 
 grace and truth through Jesus Christ, in whom was the 
 manifestation of God himself. The divine influence affects 
 the individual soul. No process of moral regeneration is 
 described ; there is a new spiritual creation (iii. 3) parallel 
 to the physical creation in the beginning. At a moment in 
 the past God through the Word had called the world into 
 being ; now, at the appointed time (after ages of unex- 
 plained darkness and doubt), the Word had appeared in 
 human form, bringing divine light and eternal life. Every 
 vestige of nationalism has here disappeared ; the relations 
 of God are primarily not with the Jews, but with human-
 
 SIN AND KIGHTEOUSNESS. 285 
 
 ity. 1 In the moral-spiritual history of the world the author 
 sees the divine creative activity. He thus expresses sub- 
 stantially the thought of Jesus, that human perfection lies 
 in communion with the divine father, only the thought is 
 clothed in the form of the Jewish- Alexandrian philosophy. 
 The history of the idea of righteousness in the New Testa- 
 ment involves the interplay of three conceptions : the Old 
 Testament idea of personal goodness, Paul's scholastic scheme 
 of imputed righteousness, and the transformation of the soul 
 by union with Christ or by the direct power of the Holy 
 Spirit. The first of these maintained itself throughout, more 
 or less modified by the conviction (which is found also in 
 the Old Testament) that true goodness is the gift of God. 
 The Pauline idea of imputation, devised by a logical mind 
 to meet a specific Jewish objection, seems to have faded 
 away with the crisis which gave it birth. It appears in 
 not very prominent shape in Second Timothy, Titus, and 
 First Peter, and at a later time virtually withdrew from 
 the field. The more simple ethical conception of righteous- 
 ness as personal thought and conduct is found particularly 
 in Hebrews and First Timothy, and to a greater or less 
 extent in all the other Epistles ; it is in fact too obvious 
 and necessary a conception of life to be got rid of except 
 in transient moments of fanaticism. The profounder con- 
 ception of inward transformation is especially prominent in 
 Ephesians and Colossians (union with Christ), and in the 
 Fourth Gospel and the First Epistle of John (renewal of 
 heart) ; and whatever the particular scheme of righteous- 
 ness and salvation, the appeal of all the New Testament 
 writers is to the consciousness and will of men. 
 
 1 The statement in John iv. 22, that salvation is from the Jews, is not, 
 rightly considered, in opposition to this universality of view. Out of Juda- 
 ism, indeed, had come the manifestation of salvation ; but the author of the 
 Fourth Gospel everywhere assumes a hostile attitude toward the Jews, and
 
 286 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 Thus Jewish national nomisra, which had successfully 
 withstood the assaults of Hellenism, succumbed to a spirit- 
 ual force which sprang from its own bosom. It was supe- 
 rior, as an organized religion, to the religious thought of 
 the Greeks ; it had more definiteness and intensity, greater 
 control over the moral-religious life, and it was in com- 
 pleter harmony with men's growing unitary conception of 
 the world. ' While, therefore, it was not averse to accepting 
 a certain Greek coloring, it maintained its organized exist- 
 ence over against Hellenism unimpaired. Its own life had, 
 however, called forth needs which it was powerless as a 
 system to satisfy. Increasing moral-religious experience and 
 reflection had awakened in the Jewish consciousness more 
 definite demands for self centred and complete moral power, 
 for inward purity and harmony with the divine will. The 
 Jewish Hellenizing philosophy and the great legal schools 
 endeavored in one direction and another to realize in life 
 the higher ideals which became distincter with every gen- 
 eration. But the national ritual, which had been growing 
 for centuries, and had interwoven itself inextricably with 
 the moral-spiritual consciousness of the people, stood griev- 
 ously in the way of a satisfactory isolation of the higher 
 ideals. The necessity for getting rid of the mass of cere- 
 monial and other external details became more and more 
 evident, and Christianity came forward to achieve this end. 
 The founder of Christianity responded to the needs of his 
 times and of humanity by announcing the two universal and 
 eternal principles of inward truthfulness and harmony with 
 the divine father of men. He did not attack the national 
 system as such, but he laid down a scheme of life which 
 struck at the roots of nationalism and laid the foundations 
 for a righteousness sufficient for all times and places : the 
 
 the antithesis which he presents is not between Judaism and Gentilism, but 
 between light and darkness, belief and unbelief.
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 287 
 
 conscience as subjective standard and guide ; God, the moral 
 ideal, as objective law and aim ; outward and inward abso- 
 lute purity and sincerity. To these all-embracing principles 
 he added nothing; he said nothing further of the details of 
 moral reconstruction and development. The elaboration of 
 the details was effected by the great theologians who fol- 
 lowed him. His person became the centre of a new con- 
 ception of moral-spiritual life. The secret of salvation was 
 sought not in his teaching, but in himself, in himself not 
 as an ideal and inspiration, but as the divinely endowed 
 creator of spiritual life and happiness. Paul, looking at the 
 problem from the Jewish national point of view, in despair 
 at man's moral impotency, cast away human righteousness, 
 and substituted for it the righteousness of the Christ, made 
 available by his death, and accompanied by an inward trans- 
 formation wrought by the divine spirit. The author of the 
 Fourth Gospel, following Alexandrian Greek-Jewish ideas, 
 thought of the Master as the divine Word, manifesting the 
 moral glory of God in the world, bringing an atmosphere 
 of light and life, in the midst of which dwelt, transformed 
 and saved, those who were chosen and led by God. Unlike 
 Paul, he takes no account of the national legal scheme ; 
 he takes refuge alone in the absolute manifestation of the 
 divine goodness and power, within which is life, without 
 which is death. It may be added that an approach to a 
 purely ethical scheme of righteousness is found in that cir- 
 cle of Christian thinkers which is represented by the Epistle 
 of James ; not the Stoic system, but the old Hebrew pro- 
 phetic conception, wherein, general provision for sin having 
 been made by a divinely appointed sacrifice, the righteous- 
 ness acceptable to God is manifested by obedience to his 
 moral precepts. Later Christianity endeavored, with vary- 
 ing fortunes, to combine these different points of view into 
 a single system of theology and life.
 
 288 SIN AND KIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 Christian antinomism grew out of Judaism, but was not 
 embraced by the Jewish people. Christianity speedily passed 
 into the hands of the Gentiles ; the Jews retained their na- 
 tional system. Nomism included the sacrificial ritual and the 
 every-day legal-ceremonial prescriptions of personal purity 
 and obedience. The sacrificial system vanished when the 
 temple was destroyed, but Judaism clung to the rest of 
 the ceremonial as the law of its life. It distinctly rejected 
 the innovations of Christianity, the Messiahship of Jesus 
 of Nazareth, the atoning efficacy of his death, his exaltation 
 to the right hand of God, the substitution of his righteous- 
 ness for the righteousness of obedience, the expectation of 
 his reappearance on earth to usher in the dispensation of 
 blessedness. But its severance from Christianity does not 
 imply that it remained morally and religiously stagnant. 
 Its ethical code was substantially the same as the Chris- 
 tian ; its ethical development, like the Christian, was deter- 
 mined by social conditions. Neither in the early centuries 
 nor in the Middle Age nor in our own times is it possible 
 to discover any marked ethical difference between Jews and 
 Gentiles ; Shy lock and Antonio are on a par in this regard. 
 In the sphere of religion, also, Judaism, like Christianity, 
 has taken its tone and coloring from the changing phases 
 of social growth. The national nomistic idea, to which the 
 Jews remained faithful, has been modified from time to time, 
 notably by Maimonides, and then more radically by Moses 
 Mendelssohn. These modifications have been in the direction 
 of greater spirituality and ethical distinctness. Christianity 
 and Judaism may be looked on as parallel developments, 
 starting from the same general material, seeking the moral- 
 spiritual ideal by different paths. Their lines of advance have 
 been determined by the elements of civilization which en- 
 tered into their lives. It is the intense nationalism of the 
 Jews which, by isolating them more or less from the gen-
 
 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. * 289 
 
 eral European thought, has rendered their peculiar develop- 
 ment possible. 
 
 In our discussion of the idea of righteousness the distinc- 
 tion between nomisin and antinomism has been sharply 
 drawn, in order to bring out more clearly the contrast be- 
 tween the two conceptions of life. It must, however, be 
 borne in mind that this distinction has had no such clear 
 historical embodiment. Judaism has never been all no- 
 mistic, nor Christianity all antinoinistic. Each of these 
 systems, while following a definite general path, exhibits 
 movements in other directions. There is a substantial agree- 
 ment between the Old Testament, the Jewish Alexandrian 
 literature, the Palestinian legal teaching, and the New Testa- 
 ment. These must all be regarded as products of the com- 
 bination and interplay of two conceptions : inward spiritual 
 regeneration, and conformity to divinely given external law, 
 both of which are essential constituents of religious life, 
 and can never vanish from the human ideal. Judaism, in 
 maintaining its national law, did not forget the inward 
 reconstruction which is taught in the Old Testament. 
 Christianity, in rejecting the Jewish sacrificial ritual arid 
 traditional ceremonial law, substituted a nomism of its own. 
 The Church has always had its systems of prescriptions, 
 obedience to which it regarded as a necessity. What Chris- 
 tianity did was to deliver to the Gentile world the pure 
 and lofty Jewish ethical monotheism freed from the burden 
 of Jewish nationalism. It thus gave freer play to moral- 
 spiritual forces by divorcing them from the restrictions of 
 particular nationalities. Christianity represents the great- 
 est effort of the world to impose the necessary restrictions 
 on nomism, to combine that inward purity, without which 
 virtue is mechanical and lifeless, with that obedience to 
 law apart from which conscience must always be an unsafe 
 guide. 
 
 19
 
 290 SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. 
 
 The doctrine of the sacrifice of the exalted Christ, the 
 Son of God, embodies the highest and final conception of 
 an external satisfaction for sin. It sprang out of the ideas 
 of the first century, Jewish and perhaps Gentile. Viewed 
 at first simply as a substitute for the old national sac- 
 rifices, the death of the Messiah was afterward variously 
 explained by Christian theologians. By its majestic and 
 awful character it represents, as has been said, a deeper 
 sense of the terribleness of offence against the divine law. 
 All advance in the intensity of plans and methods of sal- 
 vation depends on increase of the seriousness with which 
 men look on the moral problems of life. What a contrast 
 between the simple joyousness of Deuteronomy and the 
 terrible seriousness of the Epistle to the Komans! The in- 
 terval between these books is marked by constant ethical 
 progress ; the idea of righteousness becomes higher and 
 higher, the sense of sin more and more profound. The cul- 
 mination of outward method is reached when God is con- 
 ceived as giving his own Son to achieve forgiveness and 
 righteousness for man. There is only one thing higher, 
 that is the method of Jesus, the transformation of the 
 soul by communion with the absolute ideal of holiness.
 
 CHAPTER V. 
 
 ETHICS. 
 
 TO the foregoing discussion of what was held to consti- 
 tute righteousness in the sight of God we may append 
 a brief account of the historical development of the content 
 of the ethical code. We need not stop to inquire into the 
 philosophical grounds of Hebrew ethics. For such an in- 
 quiry there is little material. Abstract psychological and 
 social investigations do not belong to the mental habits or 
 the aims of the biblical writers, who are concerned only 
 with practical morality. The question of the nature of con- 
 science and the origin of men's judgments concerning right 
 and wrong is not discussed in the Bible. There is no spec- 
 ulation respecting determinism and indeterminisra ; man's 
 practical freedom is everywhere assumed. There is no co- 
 ercion of the will by God, demon, or man ; every man is 
 held responsible for his deeds, and the inner history of his 
 will is not further investigated. Joseph's brethren " could 
 not" speak peaceably to him because their malice got the 
 better of their kindly feeling Yahwe hardened Pharaoh's 
 heart ; but Pharaoh also hardened his own heart. Evil 
 spirits enticed prophets ; but the prophets were of their 
 own motion false. Satan tempted David and Judas, and 
 the king and the betrayer were none the less held guilty. 
 The heathen, says Paul, are worthy of death for acting 
 according to that reprobate mind to which God gave them 
 up ; and unbelievers, blinded by the god of this world, per- 
 ish in their unbelief. The wretchedness of the natural life,
 
 292 ETHICS. 
 
 exclaims the Apostle, lies in the conflict of impulses, the 
 passions doing what the better judgment condemns. So 
 in respect to the rules of good conduct : these are regarded 
 in the books of the Old and New Testaments, with per- 
 haps one exception (Ecclesiastes), as resting solely on the 
 commands of God, and the motive which is urged for 
 well-doing is the desire to obtain divine rewards or escape 
 divine punishments. It is a purely practical interest that 
 controls the ethical thought of the Bible. The question 
 before it is : What is the conduct that pleases God ? In 
 point of fact, the Jewish ethical code, like that of other 
 peoples, changed with the changing social conditions and 
 the consequent rise of new ideals. To follow this history 
 in minute detail would require a treatise; all that will be 
 attempted here is a short outline of the historical progress 
 of the code and of the circumstances which determined its 
 line of growth. 
 
 1. The Jewish moral code of the fifth century B. c. (con- 
 tained in the prophets and the Law) was a broad and noble 
 one, worthy to be compared with the best of the time. 
 Within the limits of the nation it recognized not only the 
 administrative duties of honesty and justice but also the 
 gentler virtues of kindness and love to the poor and dis- 
 tressed and to all one's brethren. This appears to be the 
 acme of the purely Jewish national ethical development. 
 In spite of contact with other peoples, the nation had up 
 to this time maintained the old social isolation. In the 
 early days there had been amalgamation with the Canaan- 
 itish tribes, out of which was formed the Israelitish nation. 
 Once formed, the people worked out its life substantially in 
 its own way, down to the Greek conquest. Intercourse with 
 Babylon and Persia, though influential in the suggestion of 
 ideas, yet left the old national unity unimpaired. The eth- 
 ical growth during this period may thus be called national.
 
 ETHICS. 293 
 
 There was no outlook beyond home-bounds ; the international 
 sentiment had not been distinctly cultivated ; there was no 
 distinct recognition of the full rights of aliens ; the social 
 conditions had not pressed this conception on the moral con- 
 sciousness of the people. The later purely national books, 
 most of the Psalms, for example, while they maintain the 
 high administrative standard, are full of bitterness toward 
 enemies. Jewish morality, in a word, like other ethical sys- 
 tems of the time, bears the impress of national isolation. 
 
 2. The new social conditions which the Greek conquest 
 forced on the Jews are well known. Not only were they 
 brought into closer contact with individuals of other nation- 
 alities, they were compelled to enter into a confederation 
 of peoples, and were thus led more and more to recognize 
 a bond of brotherhood among all men. Their experience in 
 this regard was the common experience of the Grseco-Roinan 
 world ; its results were seen in all the moralists of the time, 
 whether Greek, Roman, or Jewish. Human nature remained 
 much the same ; there were good and bad men everywhere, 
 Hillels and Herods, Johns and Judases ; but the social 
 code was gradually assuming a new tone. The ethical re- 
 flection of the new conditions is found in a portion of the 
 Jewish literature of the two centuries before the beginning 
 of our era. The Psalms are, by their nature, the expression 
 of national feeling. Profoundly religious, they do not rise 
 above the level of the old prophetic morality ; they illus- 
 trate the law, of which there are so many other expressions, 
 that the paths of growth and stadia of development of re- 
 ligion and morality are not always the same in the same 
 community and the same period. On the other hand, in 
 Proverbs, Wisdom of Solomon, Ecclesiasticus, and in the say- 
 ings of the great lawyers, we find a distincter recognition 
 of individual social relations and of the law of kindness ; 
 exhortation to heal differences between neighbors (Prov.
 
 294 ETHICS. 
 
 xxv. 9) ; to admonish in kindness those who offend us 
 (Ecclus. xix. 13-17) ; to cover transgression by friendly for- 
 getfulness or guidance (Prov. xvii. 9) ; to be helpful, to lend 
 and give alms freely (Ecclus. xxix. 2, 12, 20 ; Tobit iv. 7) ; 
 to forgive injuries in hope of being forgiven (Prov. xv. 1 ; 
 xxiv. 29 ; Ecclus. xxviii. 2-5) ; to be good to enemies (Prov. 
 xxiv. 17; xxv. 21, 22). We find also injunctions against 
 swearing (Ecclus. xxiii. 29), and a description of the blessed- 
 ness of the persecuted righteous (Wisd. of Sol. iii. 4). In 
 Tobit (iv. 15), and in a saying of Hillel, we have the golden 
 rule in negative form. 
 
 Most of the works above cited belong to that class of pro- 
 ductions (the Hokma, the literature of wisdom) which shows 
 least of the characteristic nationalism of the time, and it 
 is natural to ascribe their cosmopolitan spirit in part to 
 the broadening influence of international intercourse. Tobit, 
 though a national book, shows traces of foreign contact. We 
 have seen reason to believe that the legal teachers were 
 not unaffected by the current Greek thought. On the other 
 hand, the Jewish national feeling was strong, and the na- 
 tional life and culture issued from that past which was 
 represented by the prophets and the Law. We are led, 
 therefore, to conclude that the higher Jewish morality of 
 the period was a true national growth, only broadened and 
 deepened by all those conditions that acted favorably on 
 the life of the people. 
 
 3. Such was the ethical system in the midst of which 
 Christianity arose ; and it is obvious that it does not dif- 
 fer substantially in details from that of the New Testa- 
 ment. In both we find as controlling elements self-mastery, 
 self-sacrifice, justice, and love to others. Nevertheless there 
 is a difference, which meets us at the outset, a new en- 
 ergy, vividness, enthusiasm. The Sermon on the Mount and 
 the other sayings of Jesus in the Gospels contain a cer-
 
 ETHICS. 295 
 
 tain higher something, a complete! recognition of the 
 positive side of individual obligation and of the inward 
 element of goodness. The ethical falseness of certain cere- 
 monial practices of the time (Mark vii. 5, 9-13) ; the neces- 
 sity of sincerity (Matt. vi. 2, 5, 16) and of thoroughgoing 
 conscientiousness (Matt. v. 33-37) ; the declaration that sin 
 and goodness lie in the thought and in the soul (Matt. v. 
 21-32 ; xv. 18) ; exhortation to self-denial for duty's sake 
 (Matt. xvi. 24) ; the complete identification of ourselves with 
 the interests of others, and the obligation to sacrifice our- 
 selves, if need be, for the sake of others (Matt. v. 38-42, 43- 
 48 ; vii. 12); the exhortation to let one's light shine (v. 16), 
 that is, not to limit one's self to passive endurance of wrong, 
 or to occasional bodily help, but to recognize the fact that 
 each man is set to be a guide to his fellows, and must there- 
 fore so purify and ennoble himself that he shall lead them 
 not into error, but into truth : l here are gathered up all 
 the elements of the highest ethical character, perfect self- 
 control, enlightened self-development, and complete sym- 
 pathy with our human surroundings. While the substance 
 of these precepts is found in preceding Jewish and non- 
 Jewish literature, they are here given with a fulness and 
 symmetry which we see nowhere else. The ethical-spiritual 
 
 1 The doctrine of non-resistance in the Sermon on the Mount may fairly 
 be understood simply as a protest against selfish and unreasonable assertion 
 of one's rights A law of absolute non-resistance may very well have been 
 the ideal of Jesus, but it cannot be asserted, from the details of his life known 
 to us, that he did not mean it to be modified or interpreted by a wise regard 
 for the interests of the individual and of society. An unrestricted rule of sub- 
 mission must apply as well to nations as to individuals, and perhaps to men 
 in their relations as well with beasts as with men. It is the law of an ideal 
 society in which justice and kindness are the ruling principles of a very large 
 majority. The hostility to the rich expressed in Luke vi. 24 can hardly be 
 taken in a spiritual sense , but it may be doubted whether Jesus held such 
 a sentiment which accords neither with the body of his teaching nor with 
 his conduct. He taught the equality of all men before God, independently of 
 worldly conditions, and he numbered among his friends rich as well as poor.
 
 296 ETHICS. 
 
 insight of Jesus laid hold of what was necessary for the 
 complete development of man's moral nature. 
 
 The purity of the ethical teaching of Jesus has been sup- 
 posed to be marred by the religious sanctions which he 
 holds up. It is said that he represents love of one's fel- 
 lows and denial of one's self as valuable not so much in 
 themselves or for the maintenance of human rights as for 
 the future rewards they bring (Matt. vi. 1). Here, however, 
 we must distinguish between the ethical ideal and the re- 
 ligious motive. Whatever prominence may be given to the 
 latter (and it is very prominent in the teaching of Jesus), 
 this does not impair the realness of the former. The su- 
 preme obligation of human brotherhood is recognized ; and 
 this is the essential point for human conduct. Further, 
 though the Sermon on the Mount does not say in so many 
 words. " Follow after justice and love, because they are the 
 eternal right," though it identifies them with the will of 
 God and thence derives their authority, it yet remains true 
 that the ultimate ground of the ethical judgment is a social 
 one: it is the perception of human rights springing out of 
 the feeling of human needs, and it cannot vitiate an ethical 
 principle to identify it with the ultimate moral basis and 
 ground of the world. 
 
 Jesus gives no speculative system of morals. The golden 
 rule is, strictly speaking, inaccurate in expression, since it 
 makes one's own desire, instead of absolute justice, the guide 
 of conduct toward others. But it is, in the first place, the 
 best practical safeguard against selfishness ; and in the sec- 
 ond place, interpreted largely as the appeal to an enlight- 
 ened and tender conscience, it is practically the safest guide 
 in man's dealing with man. New social conditions are con- 
 stantly creating new moral problems. There are many mod- 
 ern questions which are not considered in the teaching of 
 Jesus, the detailed answers to which must be worked out by
 
 ETHICS. 297 
 
 modern experience ; but no ethical principle has yet been dis- 
 covered more satisfactory than the self-forgetting love which 
 is enjoined in the Sermon on the Mount. 
 
 4. The ethics of the Epistles, so far as the content proper 
 of the code is concerned, offers nothing in addition to what 
 has already been mentioned. James has the morality of the 
 Old Testament (and with his description of wisdom, iii. 17, 
 cf. Wisd. of Sol. vii. 22, 23). The other books are more dis- 
 tinctively Christian in tone. It is unnecessary to specify 
 the particular moral duties they enjoin. They emphasize 
 the gentler qualities, humility, kindness, love. In 1 Cor- 
 inthians xiii. Paul rises to a pitch of loftiest inspiration. 
 It is noticeable that the golden rule in the form in which 
 Jesus gives it is nowhere quoted. James (ii. 8) cites the 
 " royal law " from the Old Testament : " Thou shalt love 
 thy neighbor as thyself ; " and the content of Jesus' word 
 is given substantially by Paul (1 Cor. xiii. ; Eom. xii. 13). 
 It is possible that Paul and the author of the Epistle of 
 James were not acquainted with this saying of the Mas- 
 ter. It is also to be noted that the duty of kindness and 
 love is generally mentioned in connection with intercourse 
 between Christian brethren. A negative demeanor is en- 
 joined toward them that are without, soberness, cautious- 
 ness, forgiveness ; and a general prohibition of vengeance 
 is quoted by Paul (Rom. xii. 19, 20) from the Old Testa- 
 ment (Prov. xxv. 21, 22); but there is little exhortation to 
 exert positive influence on unbelievers, to seek to win them 
 by kindness, to practise systematic beneficence toward them 
 (Gal. vi. 10). The explanation of this omission is probably 
 to be found in the social conditions of the time, the social 
 separateness of Christians and others. Paul, indeed, set the 
 example of wise self-adaptation to other men (1 Cor. x. 33 ; 
 ix. 19-22). 
 
 Broader cosmopolitan points of view may perhaps be
 
 298 ETHICS. 
 
 found in the New Testament ; as, for example, the con- 
 ception of a universal commonwealth (Rom. xii. 5 ; Eph. ii. 
 14-19). Such an idea might be referred to Gricco-Roman 
 sources. But it is to be observed that these passages deal 
 solely with the Church, and are not properly cosmopolitan ; 
 they speak of a community in Christ, not of a brotherhood 
 of humanity. They break down the barrier between Jew 
 and Gentile as such ; and this, was an important step for- 
 ward. Similarly the barriers between nationalities were 
 broken down by Roman citizenship. In each case there is 
 a unity based, not on simple recognition of human fellow- 
 ship, but on an external religious or political condition ; 
 yet each represented a step toward the idea of human soli- 
 darity, each was the product of the social conditions. The 
 Christian idea may have issued directly and solely from 
 the Christian doctrine of a universal salvation, or it may 
 have been in part suggested by Greek philosophy and the 
 Roman state. 
 
 5. It is remarked above that speculative questions re- 
 specting the origin and nature of man's moral conscious- 
 ness and judgments are not considered in the Bible. It 
 is equally true that there is no recognition of a purely 
 earthly and human end and aim of life. The object every- 
 where held up is the gaining the favor of God as the 
 means of securing one's own happiness. The prophets and 
 the Law enjoin obedience to divine commands as the con- 
 dition of national prosperity; the Psalms anticipate fulness 
 of joy in God's presence and unending delights through 
 his power ; Proverbs commends wisdom as the bestower 
 of long life, riches, honor, and peace ; the Sermon on the 
 Mount enjoins the laying up of treasures in heaven, walk- 
 ing in the narrow way of life, and building one's house 
 upon a rock ; the Epistles urge the working out of one's 
 own salvation ; and in Hebrews (xii. 2) the motive of Jesus'
 
 ETHICS. 299 
 
 endurance is said to be "the joy that was set before him." 
 Devotion to the interests of humanity for humanity's sake 
 is nowhere distinctly announced as the chief aim of life. 
 The end of life is declared to be one's own eternal hap- 
 piness, and the condition of happiness to be obedience to 
 the will of God. So far this scheme of life may be called 
 religious egoism. 
 
 But on this point two remarks must be made. So far 
 as regards the existence of an egoistic motive, this neither 
 can nor should be got rid of, for the perfection of humanity 
 involves the perfection of one's self as a part of humanity ; 
 obligation to sacrifice or neglect one's moral perfectness is 
 inconceivable. The real question, therefore, is twofold : first, 
 what is the nature of the self-perfection (and this must be 
 identical with the nature of the perfection of humanity) 
 which is sought ? and secondly, how far are the two aims, 
 the perfecting of self and the perfecting of humanity, com- 
 bined into a harmonious unity ? As to the first of these 
 points, the self-perfection considered in the New Testament 
 (which in this respect completes the Old Testament thought) 
 is not merely happiness ; it is moral union with God as the 
 moral ideal, which is the highest conception of self-culture, 
 and is therefore a legitimate egoism. As to the second point, 
 devotion to the interests of others, though not a definitely 
 formulated maxim, is a practical aim in the higher New 
 Testament scheme of life (more vaguely hinted at in the pre- 
 Christian Jewish literature). Jesus spent his life in doing 
 good, and died rather than surrender a principle which he 
 believed to be of prime importance for men ; Paul conse- 
 crated himself unreservedly to what he held to be the high- 
 est human interests. The New Testament idea of duty 
 involves doing good to all men, not separating one's own 
 well-being from the well-being of others. 
 
 The ethical defect of the New Testament is therefore
 
 300 ETHICS. 
 
 speculative rather than practical. The ethical idea is not 
 distinguished from the religious ; the perfecting of life is 
 defined to be an everlasting salvation which is to be se- 
 cured by certain divinely appointed means. Human duty 
 involves the attempt to bring this salvation to all men. 
 The principle of devotion to humanity is not lacking ; but 
 it is true that attention is fixed less on the present life 
 with its multifarious social needs, and more on that im- 
 pending crisis (the new era to be ushered in by the Mes- 
 siah or else by death) which was to settle the question of 
 human good. The more definite isolation of the whole of 
 earthly life as the object of ethical effort was reserved for 
 a later time. 
 
 6. The distinctive characteristic, however, of the New 
 Testament ethics is not so much its content as its spirit. 
 In contrast with the philosophic, self-centred calm of Sto- 
 icism and Epicureanism, and the sober-minded indifference 
 of Ecclesiastes, it is permeated by warm sympathy, by a 
 glow of ardent, natural life. Its secret is that it seeks per- 
 fection not immediately in self-culture (though this it does 
 not neglect), but in positive self-abandonment to a higher 
 will. It derives its impulse from the sentiments of duty to 
 God and gratitude and devotion to Christ as Saviour. It 
 is free from wearing thought concerning results ; these are 
 in the hand of God. Man's only care is to ally himself 
 with God and Christ in sincere, loving beneficence, secure 
 in the conviction that his present and his future are watched 
 over and guided to a blessed end by the hand of the divine 
 father. The elevation of this higher spirit to the distinct 
 position of guiding principle must be ascribed to Jesus. 
 His moral consciousness seized on and blended into a vital 
 unity those great ideas of love and justice which the na- 
 tional experience (and all human experience) had been 
 slowly working out for centuries. Eespect your fellow-coun-
 
 ETHICS. 301 
 
 tryman's rights and love him as yourself, say the prophets 
 arid the Law ; extend this rule of reciprocity to all men, say 
 the Wisdom books and the lawyers ; inform it, says Jesus, 
 with a glow of tenderness, with the recognition of all men 
 as sons of one divine father. This he made the central 
 principle of conduct toward others. 
 
 It may be added that the form of faith which took shape 
 under the hand of Paul was better fitted to stimulate the 
 ordinary ethical feeling than the moral code given in the 
 Sermon on the Mount. The latter appealed to human love 
 of perfection and to the reward which would come from the 
 favor of God ; all else it left to man's own conscience and 
 will. The former presented a grand theological scheme in 
 which the details of salvation were set forth, the central 
 figure of Jesus at once presenting the idea of redemption 
 in definite, tangible shape, and offering a model for ethi- 
 cal imitation. It was the prime defect of Greek systems 
 of philosophy, so far as regards their effect on the masses, 
 that they produced no theological organization, no church 
 in which the warm human life might be appropriated, fos- 
 tered, stimulated by a definite hope of complete happiness ; 
 and the same remark applies in less degree to the religious 
 reform instituted by Jesus, who also contemplated not a 
 church, but the purification of the national spirit. What 
 was needed for the people was the embodiment of the best 
 ethical law and spirit in an organization which by its work 
 and its sanctions should stimulate human effort to the ut- 
 most. This result was achieved mainly by the Apostle Paul ; 
 or, it may be more accurate to say, the work of church- 
 organization, begun by the first disciples, received a mighty 
 impulse from him. Certain peculiarities of his scheme were 
 gradually dropped, but the organization itself was maintained 
 and developed in succeeding generations, and the Church 
 took its place as a powerful ethical lever, imposing its moral-
 
 302 ETHICS. 
 
 ity on the world, and supporting it by all those motives of 
 gratitude and hope of reward which are most effective in the 
 life of man. 
 
 This is not the place to attempt to state, even in merest 
 outline, the actual influence of Christianity in moulding the 
 ethical life of the world. Such questions are very compli- 
 cated and difficult. But without undertaking to define the 
 particular elements of the new moral order of things, and 
 recognizing the slowness of its growth, it may be said that 
 the ethical outcome of the Christian teaching was the more 
 definite isolation and formulation of certain controlling prin- 
 ciples of conduct, and the implanting of them in the general 
 life of men as an effective everyday po\ver. They were in- 
 telligently and vitally accepted only by the higher souls ; 
 but they secured public recognition as the basis of the eth- 
 ical code, and thus entered with fresh vigor on their task 
 of coercing the baser principles of human conduct. The pub- 
 lic conscience was enlightened, life became ethically simpler, 
 and the higher maxims more and more demonstrated their 
 truth by the practical evidence they gave of conformity to 
 men's noblest instincts and best interests. 1 
 
 1 On biblical ethics, see the commentaries, works on the philosophy of 
 religion (Pfleiderer and others), works on Old Testament theology (Schultz, 
 Oehler, etc.) and New Testament theology (Immer, Weiss, etc.), articles 
 in encyclopaedias (Herzog-Plitt, Lichtenberger, etc.), and general remarks 
 in works on general and Christian ethics (Dorner, Gass, Martensen, Marti- 
 neau, etc ). On the relation between Greek and Christian ethical ideas, 
 see O. Pfleiderer, "Moral und Religion," 1872; F. Jodl, "Geschichte der 
 Ethik," 1882; C. E. Luthardt, "Die antike Ethik in ihrer geschichtlichen 
 Entwickelung als Einleitung in die Geschichte der christlichen Moral," 
 1887, and "Geschichte der christlichen Ethik vor der Reformation," 1888. 
 On the ethics of the Gospels, see J. R. Seeley, "Ecce Homo," 1886; W. M. 
 Salter, "Ethical Religion," 1888; J. A. Broadus, "Jesus of Nazareth," 1890; 
 O. Fliigel, "Die Sittenlehre Jesus," 1888 (which I am sorry to have been 
 unable to consult). A good bibliography will be found in the " Theologischer 
 Jahresbericht."
 
 CHAPTER VI. 
 
 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 
 
 THE conception of the kingdom of God is a marked 
 characteristic of Jewish religious thought, perhaps 
 its most distinctive peculiarity. It is the idea of a social 
 organization in which the divine and human shall be per- 
 fectly blended, the social ideal being complete conformity 
 to the divine will and complete interpenetration by the 
 divine guiding and moulding presence. Such a conception 
 may be said to exist to some extent in all communities, 
 inasmuch as the supremacy and control of the supernatural 
 powers is everywhere recognized ; but among no other peo- 
 ple has the idea been so definitely grasped as among the 
 Jews. Elsewhere the main stress has been laid on con- 
 quest, government, literature, philosophy, or art ; and the 
 theocratic idea, the feeling of the direct and complete de- 
 pendence of the community on God, when it has been recog- 
 nized, has played only a secondary r61e. It is only in a few 
 cases that the attempt to embody it in an historical form 
 has been at all successful ; and among these it is to the 
 Hebrew theocracy that the first rank, in precision and prac- 
 tical efficiency, must be assigned. 1 
 
 1 Next to the Jewish, the most successful theocratic system was that of 
 Islam, especially under Mohammed and the Medina califs, less under the 
 first century of the Bagdad cahfate. Still less definite were the attempts at 
 theocratic organization under the Buddhist Asoka (third century B.C.) and 
 the Sassanian Zoroastrians (from third to seventh century A. D.). Traces of 
 the conception are recognizable in ancient Egypt, in modern China, and in 
 a peculiar form in the first century of the New England colonies. It is note-
 
 304 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 
 
 The Jewish theocratic idea has a noteworthy history ex- 
 tending over many centuries. Beginning with a merely 
 external political form, it grew finally, under Christian in- 
 fluence, into a predominantly moral-spiritual system, in 
 which comparatively little of the external remained. It is 
 this development which we are called on to trace. We are 
 concerned not so much to mark all the differences of de- 
 tail of the Jewish ideas on the subject in the Old Testa- 
 ment and the New Testament as to note the increasing 
 control which was obtained by the higher elements of the 
 religious life. 1 
 
 Four stadia may be recognized in the history of the Jewish- 
 Christian theocratic idea : the early unconscious period of 
 mere non-ethical nationalism, the prophetic or ethical na- 
 tionalism, the apocalyptic conception of special divine ex- 
 ternal interposition, and the higher New Testament thought 
 in which the ethical-spiritual predominates. 
 
 Nothing in the history of the Jews is more remarkable 
 than the hope which they continued for a long period to 
 cherish of a definite and brilliant future. Other peoples 
 have been patriotic, have shown themselves capable of he- 
 roic effort for freedom and of resistance to foreign pressure. 
 The Persian kingdom of to-day is a striking example of the 
 maintenance of national life through many centuries of de- 
 pression and subjugation. Persia has lived through the dom- 
 ination of the Parthians and of the Arabians, and grown 
 finally into an organization which, with modifications that 
 have come in through the centuries, may be regarded as an 
 
 worthy that we find little or no trace of a theocracy in any ancient Semitic 
 people except the Jews, though this may be due in part to the scantiness 
 of our information. 
 
 1 It does not belong to our subject to follow the history below the New 
 Testament, but it may be noted that the same sort of moral-spiritual growth 
 has gone on within the bounds of Judaism. There is a large section of mod- 
 ern Jews which retains only the ethical-spiritual side of the Messianic idea.
 
 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 305 
 
 historical continuation of the Achsemenian times. History 
 offers other, though less striking, examples. But the Jewish 
 experience differs from all these. It is not merely patriot- 
 ism ; it is the patriotic imagination quickened and organized 
 by religious feeling ; it is the national sentiment exalted into 
 glowing fervor and unswerving confidence ; it is the coin- 
 pletest organization that the world has ever seen of patriotic- 
 religious hope. 
 
 The origin of this hope may be traced, as far as such 
 things are traceable, to certain elements of the Hebrew char- 
 acter and development. In the first place, we have to re- 
 cognize in the Jews an extraordinary power of persistence. 
 Their whole history shows an uncommonly great develop- 
 ment of individuality, ability to maintain their own person- 
 ality against opposing influences, a toughness of fibre, the 
 like of which may be seen in some other nations, but per- 
 haps nowhere else so marked as in the Jews, at least, no 
 other people has had such opportunity to show it. Their 
 experience during the Middle Age in Europe is sufficient to 
 prove their enormous power of self-maintenance. Their sur- 
 vival is no doubt to be attributed to a combination of cir- 
 cumstances ; but whatever else there may have been, it is 
 evident that no small part of the result is due to their 
 innate resisting and persisting power. 
 
 In close connection with this quality is the religious side 
 of their history. As far back as we can trace them, their 
 attitude toward the national deity was peculiar, a very 
 pronounced and controlling theological particularism. The 
 later Babylonians had a decided preference for Marduk above 
 other gods ; the Moabites seem to have been devoted chiefly 
 to Kemosh ; but the Israelites, with still greater devotion, 
 through all their long dallyings with other deities, clung to 
 their own Yah we, whose sole worship was made by the 
 prophets (that is to say, by the controlling intellect of the 
 
 20
 
 306 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 
 
 nation) the central point of religion and politics. At the 
 same time, the remarkable religious organizing power of the 
 people showed itself ; a series of religious institutions, des- 
 tined ultimately to transform the nation into an ecclesi- 
 astical organization, began before the exile. Religious ideas 
 were worked up with fulness and roundness. The rela- 
 tion of the people to their god took very definite shape : 
 he belonged to them, arid they to him ; they were under 
 obligation to honor and serve him alone, and he under 
 corresponding obligation to help them against all their en- 
 emies. These ideas crystallized in the prophetic thought into 
 a conception of a covenant between God and the people ; a 
 covenant was the necessary expression of alliance. It was 
 held that Yahwe had chosen Israel from among all nations 
 in the earth, and had promised it his continued blessing on 
 the condition on its part of obedience and loyalty, 
 
 This is only the developed form of a very early set of 
 ideas, and one not peculiar to the Hebrews. A clan, or tribe, 
 at a certain stage of growth, enters into a specially close 
 relation with a deity who is its kinsman and fast friend, 
 its ally and patron, and entitled to its special devotion ; at 
 a later stage such a deity may become a national god. With 
 such an origin agree the first details we have of the relation 
 between Yahwe and the Israelitish tribes. 1 In the period 
 of the Judges he is to Israel what Kemosh is to Ammon 
 (Judg. xi. 24). The relation is here one of external worship 
 and protection, and so remains substantially down to the 
 
 1 Of the origin and meaning of the name " Yahwe," and of the begin- 
 nings of the Yahwe-cult among the Hebrews, we have no definite informa- 
 tion. One tradition (Ex. vi. 3) states that it was unknown till after Jacob's 
 time, and apparently ascribes its introduction to Moses, while another (Gen. 
 iv. 26) refers it to the earliest times of the human race For discussions of 
 the name see Friedrich Delitzsch, "Wo lag das Farad ies ? " Leipzig, 1881, 
 and S. 11. Driver, in "Studia Biblica," Oxford, 1885; and on the origin of 
 the cult, the histories of Kuenen, Wellhausen, Gratz, Stade, and Renan.
 
 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 307 
 
 time of Ahab and Jehoshaphat (early part of the ninth cen- 
 tury B. c.), whose attitude toward Yah we is about the same 
 as that of the Moabite king Mesha toward Kemosh. 1 The 
 idea of an agreement or covenant between deity and people 
 is primitive. The peculiarity of Israel is that, in accordance 
 with its general power of religious organization, it so clearly 
 defined and expressed the idea, and wove into it its high- 
 est religious thought, absolute, justice in God, spirituality 
 in man. This highly developed idea appears already in the 
 earliest of the writing prophets (Amos iii. ix.). 
 
 Out of this conception of the covenant flows all the suc- 
 ceeding history. The nation continued its particularistic 
 development ; it elaborated more and more its ceremonial 
 law ; it attempted to isolate itself. The thicker its misfor- 
 tunes, the more it wrapped itself up in its own ideals. All 
 its experiences were interpreted in the light of the covenant : 
 prosperity was regarded as a fulfilment of the divine prom- 
 ise ; adversity was accepted as a chastisement for unfaith- 
 fulness and a preparation for coming blessing. Whatever 
 the situation, the leading religious thinkers explained it in 
 the interests of the nation. The national imagination, em- 
 bodied in prophets and seers, looked to the near future for 
 the realization of boundless hopes, and most of all in times 
 of suffering. The picture of the future was based upon the 
 present, and changed from age to age with the changing cir- 
 cumstances of the nation. The Messianic history is a series 
 of shifting views. The essential thing was the enlivening, 
 stimulating hope ; the historical shape which it assumed was 
 an accident of the times. 
 
 The history of the national hope is the history of the 
 national thought ; whatever elements entered into the one 
 showed themselves in the other. So long as the nation 
 
 1 See the inscription of the Moabite Stone in Ginsbnrg's edition, London, 
 1871, or " The Records of the Past," vol. xi., or Stade's " Geschichte," I. 534.
 
 308 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 
 
 preserved its political independence and its comparative iso- 
 lation in the midst of small nationalities, its conception of 
 the future was similarly restricted ; when it became a part 
 of great world-empires (Persia, Greece, and Rome) and en- 
 tered into closer association with other peoples, the picture 
 assumed a more cosmopolitan shape. At the same time the 
 eschatology became more definite ; the doctrines of immor- 
 tality and resurrection took shape and naturally colored the 
 view of the future. The modifications in the ethical ideas 
 of the nation necessarily showed themselves in the forms of 
 the Messianic hope ; the individual assumed greater promi- 
 nence in accordance with the general ethical development; 
 the idea of self-culture and self-denial became more impor- 
 tant ; the general tendency, especially among the nobler 
 minds, was to exalt and make prominent the element of eth- 
 ical spirituality. With all these modifications, however, the 
 original, central idea remained unchanged, the righteous 
 nation was to be delivered from enemies and ushered into 
 an era of prosperity. A brief review of the portraiture of 
 the national future, beginning with the pre-prophetic period 
 and coming down through the prophets and the apocalyptic 
 books into the Jewish and the Christian literature of the first 
 century, will exhibit both the local coloring of the thought 
 and the growth of the ethical element. 
 
 1. "We find no outlook into the future before the eighth 
 century. Up to that time the nation was engaged in the 
 ordinary struggle for existence; its thought centred on the 
 present. It had not come to political or moral self-con- 
 sciousness. Gideon, Jephtha, Samuel, David, and Solomon 
 represent only the ordinary national ambition. There was 
 a certain religious unity (as in all ancient and modern na- 
 tions), and there was a certain general hope in God, vague, 
 non-ethical, not yet advanced to the rank of an article of 
 the national faith. As far as we can judge from the docu-
 
 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 309 
 
 merits, no prophetic voice had, as late as the tenth century- 
 announced a definite relation between righteousness and 
 prosperity. 1 Time naturally brought about a change in the 
 nation's inner life ; political complications and reverses 
 forced it to think of its future, and the development of 
 the moral consciousness introduced an ethical element into 
 its self-analysis. This progress had doubtless been going 
 on in an unconscious way during the ninth century (Elijah 
 and Elisha) ; but it did not take shape until the eighth 
 century, when the Syrian and Assyrian powers began to 
 be oppressive, and in the Northern kingdom the shadow 
 of the final catastrophe became visible to the more keen- 
 sighted of the religious statesmen. The suffering of the 
 nation, said the prophets, was a chastisement from God 
 for the national sin ; but there should follow political and 
 moral regeneration, the maintenance of the existing form 
 of government with the triumph of the religion of Israel. 
 2. The pre-exilian prophets looked to the defeat or sub- 
 jugation of surrounding nations, including the Assyrians, 
 and the perpetuity of the Davidic dynasty. For their sins, 
 said Amos (c. B. c. 770), Israel should be carried into cap- 
 tivity beyond Damascus, the land should tremble, the people 
 should be sifted among all the nations, yet not the least 
 grain should fall to the earth, the sinners of the nation 
 should die by the sword 2 (Am v. 27; vi. 14; viii. 8 ; ix. 9). 
 Hosea (c. B. c. 750-730) describes the long-suffering, faithful 
 love of Yahwe : he would betroth the nation to himself in 
 
 1 The books of Samuel and Kings are in many passages, notably in the 
 portraitures of Samuel, David, and Solomon, colored by Deuteronomic ideas ; 
 examples are 1 Sam. xv,, 2 Sam. xii , 1 K. viii. 
 
 2 The genuineness of the references in Amos and Hosea to the establish- 
 ment of the Davidic dynasty may be doubted. Amos ix. 11-15 appears to 
 be colored by experience of captivity, and in Hos. iii 5 the words "David 
 their king" seem out of place, since the prophet is there concerned with 
 Israel alone.
 
 310 THE KINGDOM OF GOD 
 
 righteousness and faithfulness ; the earth should yield its 
 increase. Israel, after abiding many days without political 
 and religious organization, should seek Yahwe, their God ; 
 strange gods should be put away; the divine anger should 
 be turned into love ; the beauty of Israel should be as the 
 olive-tree, and his fragrance as Lebanon (Hos. ii., in., xiv. 1-7). 
 A deeper and sadder conception of the national life appears 
 in Isaiah (B. c. 740-700), who lived in the midst of the 
 Assyrian invasions and the fall of the Northern kingdom : 
 the gross conscience of the people should not respond to his 
 appeal ; the land should be wasted, but a remnant should 
 be left, sacred to the God of Israel, governed in righteous- 
 ness by a Davidic king, when the Assyrian should have been 
 driven away (vi. 9-13 ; x. 20, 24-27). Here we have merely 
 an ethical-religious organization of the nation, on the old 
 political lines, but with a thorough -going demand for right- 
 eousness. Isaiah's younger contemporary, Micah, has left 
 us no word of hope, but only a prediction of punishment 
 (i.-iii). 1 Nahum (c. B. c. 634) utters only an exulting cry 
 over the approaching fall of Nineveh ; the destruction of 
 the great world-empire of Assyria was doubtless then a part 
 of the national hope. Zephaniah, somewhat later, sees in 
 the coming " day of Yahwe " not only the desolation of Nin- 
 eveh, but also the chastisement of Jerusalem (i. ii.). 2 In 
 Habakkuk (c. B. c. 605), who looked to the punishment of 
 the Chaldeans, there is the larger expectation (Hab ii. 14) 
 that the whole earth shall be forced to recognize the glory 
 which belongs to the God of Israel by virtue both of his 
 moral perfection and of the power which he manifests in 
 
 1 The remainder of the hook of Micah (perhaps intended to supplement 
 the prophet's meagre utterances) is later than the eighth century, and will 
 he referred to below. Chapt. vi. may belong to the seventh century, but con- 
 tains no outlook into the future 
 
 2 Chapt. iii. differs in tone from the preceding, appearing to have in view 
 a different condition of things ; its similarity to Mic. iv. 6-13 is obvious.
 
 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 311 
 
 the deliverance and maintenance of his people. Jeremiah's 
 attitude toward the Chaldeans is different from that of Hab- 
 akkuk ; he is decidedly friendly to Nebuchadnezzar, 1 whom 
 he regards as God's instrument for chastising recreant Israel. 
 The nation shall go into captivity for its sins, but shall be 
 restored to its own land and" live prosperously under the 
 righteous rule of its own princes, with the maintenance of 
 the complete national organization (Jer. xxv. 811; xxx. ; 
 xxxi. 1-30) ; and God, says some prophet of this time, will 
 make a new covenant w r ith his people, writing his law in 
 their hearts, forgiving their sins, and establishing them in 
 moral purity (Jer. xxxi. 31-3-i) 2 Ezekiel, who was in Baby- 
 lonia, and showed no less kindly feeling toward Nebuchad- 
 nezzar and his people than Jeremiah, looks likewise to a 
 political restoration in Canaan, a new spirit of hearty obe- 
 dience, a resuscitation and moral regeneration of the people, 
 the final victory to be preceded by a combined attack of cer- 
 tain Northern peoples on Israel ; and he gives in the form of 
 a vision a complete political-religious constitution for the re- 
 stored nation (Ezek. xxxvi.-xlviii.). The expectation of the 
 exilian Isaiah is substantially the same, only he idealizes 
 Israel into a divinely appointed instrument for the enlight- 
 enment of all the nations. The restoration to Canaan was 
 to be marked by a regeneration of all things, the creation of 
 new heavens and a new earth wherein Jerusalem was to be 
 the centre of strength and hope and joy, and Israel should 
 remain forever holy and blessed in the sight of God (Isa, 
 Ix.-lxvi, especially Ixv. 17-25, Ixvi. 19-24). Here probably 
 
 1 The prophet's friendliness toward the Chaldean king is so marked and 
 persistent that passages asorihed to him which breathe a different tone (such 
 as xxv. 12, 1., li.) may he set down as coming from another hand. 
 
 2 It seems doubtful whether xxxi. 31-40 belongs to Jeremiah ; or rather, 
 the style and the attitude toward the ritual make it probable that the pas- 
 sage is from another hand ; but it in any case belongs to the period of Deuter- 
 onomy, Jeremiah, and Ezekiel, and illustrates the thought of the time.
 
 312 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 
 
 belongs Mic. vii., where the prophet looks to deliverance 
 from exile and foreign oppression, and the exaltation of the 
 nation, basing his hope on the incomparable pardoning 
 mercy of Yahwe. To the exilian or a somewhat later 
 period we may also perhaps refer Deut. xxviii-xxx., 1 
 Kings viii., passages in which the perpetuity of the national 
 life is anticipated, but conditioned on obedience to the 
 divine law. 
 
 3. The exile exalted the hopes of those Israelites who 
 cherished most ardently the national feeling. After this ter- 
 rible blow, the God of Israel, they felt sure, would raise his 
 people to an unexampled height of happiness, of which the 
 elements were political independence and prosperity, fidel- 
 ity to the worship of Yahwe, and moral uprightness of life. 
 Whatever was necessary to secure these ends, that they 
 believed God would do. When Cyrus, in accordance with 
 his general policy of restoring the exiled peoples in Baby- 
 lonia to their homes, gave the Jews permission to return to 
 Canaan, a portion of the Israelitish colony gave themselves 
 up to the most unbounded joy and expectation, 1 the ex- 
 pression of which is found in the exilian Isaiah. This was 
 the culmination of the prophetic hope, which on the polit- 
 ical side was never fulfilled, though it was a true instinct 
 which foresaw the triumph of Israelitish religious thought. 2 
 The little band of patriots, about forty thousand in all, 3 
 returned to Canaan and found little or nothing that the 
 
 1 It is not a matter of course that all the real patriots returned to Pales- 
 tine. Opinions probably differed as to the wisest policy ; and it is certain 
 that at a later period a very decided national feeling showed itself among 
 the Jews who remained in Babylonia. 
 
 2 It was about the same time (second half of the sixth century n. c.) that 
 the foundations were laid in India, Greece, and Rome for three other great 
 movements of human progress 
 
 8 The number given in Neh. vii. 66 (42,360) is described as that of the 
 "men" (verse 7), according to which the whole population would have been 
 about 200,000 ; but the number of servants of both sexes (7,337) and of asses
 
 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 313 
 
 great exilian prophet had predicted. Steady toil was neces- 
 sary to gain their daily bread, and it was with great diffi- 
 culty that they found means to rebuild the temple. It 
 was to this last end that the prophets Haggai and Zecha- 
 riah (Zech. i. viii.) devoted themselves ; yet they also, in all 
 the pressure of the time, cast a glance into the future. 
 Zechariah predicted a righteous, political success, and Hag- 
 gai the exaltation of the temple; the desirable things of all 
 nations should come and fill the new house with glory (Zech. 
 viii. 1-15 ; Hag. ii. 6-9). Half a century passed ; Palestine 
 was a Persian province, and there was no prospect of politi- 
 cal independence. The ritual-religious organization had been 
 steadily growing, and the hope of the best men lay in obe- 
 dience to the Law. The prophet Malachi (c. B. c. 460) pre- 
 dicted the appearance of a messenger of God, who should 
 purify the Levites, separate the evil element of the nation 
 from the good, and unite the hearts of the people in the fear 
 of Yahwe ; after him should come the great and terrible day 
 of Yahwe, the divine intervention which was to strike dis- 
 may into the souls of the evil-doers, and establish Israel in 
 ethical and Levitical uprightness (Mai. iii. iv.). 
 
 Other ideas, however, than the predominantly legal-ritual 
 existed in the fifth century, if we may here place the pro- 
 phetic sections, Isa. ii. 2-4 (nearly the same in Mic. iv. 1-5), 
 xix. The first of these stands out of connection in its pres- 
 ent position, and has a quiet tone wholly different from the 
 vigorous, intense polemic of Isaiah. It has a more defined 
 conception of law than Isa. Ixi. (which it in other respects 
 strongly resembles), and less ritualism than Zech. xiv. It 
 is a definite anticipation of the universal acceptance of the 
 worship of Yahwe, the accompaniment of which shall be 
 
 (6,720) suggests not more than 8,000 families, or a total population of 40,000, 
 and this number agrees with the feeble condition of the colony as described 
 in Ezra and Nehemiah.
 
 314 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 
 
 the prevalence of universal peace. It is the vision of the 
 ethical-religious triumph of Israel, the national life and inde- 
 pendence being assumed, but not emphasized. 1 There is a 
 similar universality of hope in Isa. xix. 18-25, 2 set forth 
 under the form of the anticipated religious unity of Egypt, 
 Assyria, and Israel, all of whom Yahwe, it is said, will 
 regard with equal affection. Here is a cosmopolitan spirit 
 that reminds us of Ps. Ixxxvii. It seems to have been born 
 of that ethical-religious largeness of view that came into 
 existence after the breaking up of the national life. It is 
 the older conviction of national permanence illuminated by 
 a distincter moral-religious ideal. 
 
 4. Prophecy was now dying out, giving place to the orderly 
 study of the Law as the national guide of conduct. More 
 than another century passed before a new prophetic word 
 was heard (or, to speak more precisely, no prophecy of this 
 intervening period has been preserved). Joel and the Second 
 Zechariah (Zech. ix.-xiv.) seem by their historical references 
 and the pronouncedly legal-ritual character of their religious 
 thought to belong to the Greek period. Their expectation is 
 the same as that of the earlier prophets. Joel sees the hos- 
 tile nations assembled and judged, while Judah and Jeru- 
 salem abide in their own land forever, free from the presence 
 of strangers and secure in the protection of Yahwe (Joel ii. 
 28-iii. 21) ; Zechariah's picture includes victory over Greece 
 under the lead of a righteous king, the reconciliation of Jeru- 
 salem and the rural districts (which had been at variance), 
 the overthrow of hostile nations, and the complete triumph 
 
 1 Verse 5 of the Micah-passage (with which compare Isa. ii. 5) introduces 
 a general national particularism which seems to be at variance with the uni- 
 versality of verse 2, and may be an addition by another hand. 
 
 2 Verse 18, with the reading "the city of the sun," was cited by Jews in 
 support of the proposal of Onias to build his temple in the Heliopolitan 
 nome ; and some modern critics have hence been inclined to refer this pas- 
 sage to that period, but the absence of a distinct reference to a temple seems 
 to make this view improbable
 
 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 315 
 
 of the religion of Yah we, so that all the families of the earth 
 should go up to Jerusalem to worship (Zech. ix. 9-17 ; xiL- 
 xiv.). Zechariah's ritualistic conception of holiness (xiv. 20, 
 21) marks one line of the progress of the national thought : 
 the perfection of the people is held to be inseparably con- 
 nected with the strict maintenance of the temple-service. A 
 somewhat similar view of the future is given in the little 
 detached section, Isa. iv. 2-6. 
 
 The occasional mention of a king who is to be Yahwe's 
 instrument for the final establishment of the nation does 
 not add to or modify the essential elements of the pro- 
 phetic thought. The king is an all but necessary part of the 
 body politic, the natural head of the nation and leader 
 of its fortunes. His presence at the final catastrophe, when 
 the great divine blessing is to come, is assumed, but not 
 spoken of in the pre-exilian prophecies; 1 it is the nation, 
 as the chosen of Yahwe, that is the object of interest. This 
 may be called specially the period of national solidarity. 
 We have already seen that an era of more defined individ- 
 ualism and institutionalism began just before the exile, and 
 the blow which destroyed for the time being the political and 
 ritual organization aroused a keener interest in the offices by 
 which it was represented. Thus Ezekiel, when the fate of 
 Jerusalem was decided, cheered his people with the prom- 
 ise of the perpetuity of the Davidic dynasty (xxxiv. 23, 24 ; 
 xxxvii. 24, 25) as well as of the Levitical priesthood (xliv. 
 
 1 As pre-exilian maybe regarded Amos (except the last section), Hosea 
 (omitting a few verses), Isa. i., ii. 6-22, iii., iv. 1, v.-x. (except ix. 6, 7, and 
 perhaps several of the preceding verses), xiv. 24-32, xv.-xviii., xx., xxii. 
 15-25, xxviii.-xxxi., xxxvii. 21-35, Mic. i.-iii., vi., Nahum, Zeph. i., ii., Hab- 
 akkuk, Jeremiah (except x. 1-16, xxiii. 5-8, xxxiii. 14-26, l.-lii., and per- 
 haps xlix ), Ezek. i.-xxxii. and part of xxxiii. (that is, the utterances of the 
 prophet up to the time when news came of the fall of Jerusalem, though 
 all his prophecies were given in the land of captivity). The omitted parts 
 suggest an exilian or post-exilian origin by their style, historical references, 
 or ritual tone.
 
 316 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 
 
 15 ; xlviii. 11, 35). To the same effect are Jer. xxxiii. 14-26 
 (cf. xxiii. 5-3), where the Davidic prince is called a " right- 
 eous scion," 1 and 2 Sam. vil, where it is declared that the 
 throne of David shall be established forever. A more par- 
 ticular application of the term " scion " is made just after 
 the exile by Zechariah (vi. 12), who gives this title to his 
 contemporary the Davidic prince Zerubbabel, the builder of 
 the temple, associating him in a sort of dual government 
 with the priest Joshua. It seems to have been in the suc- 
 ceeding period, when Palestine was merely a province of the 
 Persian empire, that the longing for deliverance and na- 
 tional organized and independent life was embodied in the 
 portraiture of an ideal king. So long as the regular govern- 
 ment existed, the king was taken for granted. The time of 
 political dissolution recalled the glories of David and his suc- 
 cessors. A people without a head thought of a royal leader 
 as the natural saviour. Such appears to be the feeling that 
 prompted the utterance of Mic. v. 2-6 (Heb. 1-5) : Jacob is 
 scattered among the nations (vs. 7, 8), and the seer hopes for 
 a military deliverer in the person of a scion of the ancient 
 royal house of Bethlehem. 2 Elsewhere we find the ethical 
 element predominating in the description of the king. The 
 main function of the Davidic scion of Isa. xi. 1-9 is wise 
 and just care for the interests of the "poor" and "meek" 
 of the land. These are the epithets by which the book of 
 Psalms everywhere designates the Israelites who, true to the 
 law of their God, were oppressed by foreign potentates (Per- 
 sian or Greek) or by apostate or unscrupulous countrymen. 
 The seer embodies his idea of perfect national happiness 
 
 1 The expression "scion" (or "sprout") is used in Isa. iv. 2, apparently 
 of the nation, or rather of the righteous remnant as a branch of the original 
 stock. The close relation between people and king makes it equally appli- 
 cable to both. 
 
 2 The Tigris-Euphrates region is here called by the old name " Assyria." 
 as in the post-exilian Zech. x. 11.
 
 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 317 
 
 in the statement that there shall be no hurtful power in 
 the world, and he connects this blessed condition of things 
 (apparently following Hab. ii. 14) with the universal recog- 
 nition of the religion of Yahwe. We have here almost the 
 germ of an apocalypse, and, as in the pre-exilian predic- 
 tions, it is the welfare of the nation which the prophet has 
 in mind ; the prince exists for Israel. The author of Isa. 
 xxxii. 1-8 describes the future ethically constituted Israel- 
 itish community, of which king and princes are only a natu- 
 ral incident. A fuller governmental description, like that 
 in Isa. xi., is given in Isa. ix. 6, 7 (Heb. v. 6). The preceding 
 verses speak of a great national affliction to be followed 
 by a glorious victory like that of Gideon over Midian. The 
 national saviour is a Davidic king, whose reign is to be 
 characterized by justice and peace, and whose dynasty is 
 to continue forever. On this glorious deliverer the seer be^ 
 stows the most exalted epithets. He represents the pres- 
 ence and power of Yahwe in the midst of the nation (like 
 the child Immanuel, " God is with us," of Isa. vii. 14), and, 
 as Israel (Hos. xi. 1) and the king of Israel (2 Sam. vii. 14; 
 Ps. ii. 7) are called " son of Yahwe," so he receives as sur- 
 names titles which express the divine presence. He is won- 
 derful (or divinely mysterious), like the angel of Judg. xiii. 
 18, wise in counsel, like the king in Isa. xi. 2, a hero, like 
 the king in Ps. xlv. 3 (Heb. 4), everlasting father or head of 
 a perpetual dynasty, prince of peace. 1 Finally, we have a 
 
 1 The expression el gibbor, commonly rendered " mighty God," is difficult ; 
 it occurs naturally of Yahwe in Isa. x. 21, but seems inapplicable to a man. 
 Some attach el to the preceding word, and render " counsellor of God," which 
 is possible, but not natural ; and there is the same objection to " counsellor of 
 the miHitv God." Gibbor would then stand separate in the sense of " hero," 
 as in Ts. xlv. 3 (4). Some take el as adjective, meaning "mighty;" but we 
 should then expect the reverse order, gibbor el. No satisfactory emendation 
 of the text has been suggested. The word el can be employed of men, accord- 
 ing to Old Testament usage, only in the sense of " mighty." The text may 
 originally have expressed some relation of the king to the " mighty God."
 
 318 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 
 
 simple picture of a peaceful monarch in Zech. ix. 9 ; but it 
 appears from verse 13 that peace is to be gained by a vic- 
 tory over Greece. In this prophetic anticipation (the latest 
 of those that deal with the re-establishment of the kingly 
 government) the hope is the same as in the others, na- 
 tional prosperity, secured by divine aid and conditioned on 
 obedience to divine law. 
 
 This prophetic-patriotic hope, ennobled by the demand for 
 righteousness, may be traced far down in the succeeding 
 literature : in Ecclesiasticus (xxxvi, 1-17 ; xxxvii. 25 ; xlvii. 
 11; 1. 23, 24), Wisdom of Solomon (iii. 8; v. 1), Baruch 
 (ii. 27-35 ; iv. 36 ; v. 5-9), Tobit (xiii. 12-18 ; xiv. 7), 1 Mac- 
 cabees (ii. 57), 2 Maccabees (ii. 18 ; xiv. 15), Psalms of Solo- 
 mon. In the prophetic scheme of the future the only definite 
 trait is the establishment of the nation in peace and pros- 
 perity in its own land. The hope is distinctively national ; 
 Israel is the centre, the sole object of the divine care. Other 
 nations are subordinated to the chosen people, and their 
 future is variously described, according to the point of view 
 and feeling of the writer. In the earlier prophecies those 
 who are hostile are to be destroyed or severely punished ; 
 at a later time (especially in the Second Isaiah and the 
 Second Zechariah), they are represented as attaching them- 
 selves to the religion of Israel. Their happiness is condi- 
 tioned on their submission ; they are always aliens, and such 
 blessings as they receive come through the intermediation 
 of Israel. The object of God's intervention is his own glory 
 and the exaltation of his own people. But along with this 
 particularistic national feeling there is the moral earnestness 
 which demanded righteousness as a necessary element of the 
 national good. If this righteousness was in part ceremonial 
 and dogmatic, it also included ethical perfectness according 
 to the best standards of the time ; and this redeems the pro- 
 phetic hope from the imputation of mere national narrow-
 
 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 319 
 
 ness ; this lifted the national consciousness up to a noble 
 ideal, and gave it universal significance for men. The proph- 
 ets did not attempt to fix the details of the great deliver- 
 ance ; theirs was a free, spontaneous, national feeling. They 
 speak from time to time of some individual deliverer; but 
 it is an ideal king, vaguely expected in the near future. No 
 one actual personage stands out with controlling prominence. 
 Their picture concerns this world only. The judgment of 
 God is temporal ; the doctrine of immortality had not been 
 established in the national consciousness. 
 
 5. The Greek oppression (beginning about 200 B. c.) in- 
 troduced important changes, political and religious. The 
 national sense of suffering became distincter than ever be- 
 fore. The iron entered into the soul of the people ; the 
 hand of the stranger weighed heavily on their most sacred 
 rights and sentiments. The fulfilment of the divine prom- 
 ises seemed long delayed ; an intense desire of deliverance 
 took possession of the Jews. From the time that they had 
 fallen under Greek control they had been learning more of 
 the history of the world, and had gained the idea of the 
 succession of empires. Their thought had passed beyond 
 this life ; in place of the old Semitic conception of Sheol, 
 the gloomy abode of life-in-death, had come the hope of 
 immortality. Scribes and lawyers began to devote them- 
 selves to a study of the sacred books, to formulate their 
 doctrines, to search them for indications of the future. Out 
 of all this material grew up a new literature, different in 
 tone from the old prophetic writing, called forth by the 
 needs of the times and expressing the current feeling ; the 
 prophet was replaced by the apocalyptic seer. 
 
 The first apocalyptic work produced by the Maccabean 
 struggle was the book of Daniel, the only book of this class 
 which gained entrance into the Canon. It was composed 
 in the midst of the stirring career of Judas Maccabseus.
 
 320 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 
 
 Antiochus Epiphanes, the mighty successor of Alexander 
 the Great, and the representative to the Jews of the Greek 
 world-kingdom, had attempted to crush the religious liber- 
 ties of the people. The little band of the faithful, led by 
 the heroic Judas, had withstood his efforts, defeated his 
 armies, and captured and cleansed Jerusalem and the tem- 
 ple. It seemed to some pious souls that this was God's 
 time for final intervention for his people. Our author, in 
 the form of visions ascribed to the seer Daniel, supposed 
 to be living in Babylon during the whole of the captivity, 
 describes the fortunes of four empires, Babylon, Media, 
 Persia, and Greece. That this is the ground over which he 
 goes is evident from the fact that his four visions, chapters 
 vii. (with which that of Nebuchadnezzar in chapter ii. is 
 identical), viii, ix., and xi., xii.,give the same history, and the 
 terminus ad quern is stated in chapter viii. to be the reign 
 of one of the successors of Alexander, who can be no other 
 than Antiochus. The picture of the future is of the most 
 general character ; it includes only the triumph of Israel 
 and the establishment of God's everlasting kingdom. The 
 personage described in vii. 13 as "like a son of man" is 
 explained in verse 27 to represent the Jewish people, or 
 more particularly the pious kernel of the nation, the saints 
 of the Most High. The final victory is to be preceded by 
 a time of great tribulation (cf. Ezek. xxxviii., xxxix.) ; the 
 angel Michael will be the patron of the people ; many of 
 the dead will arise, some to honor and some to shame ; the 
 wise shall shine as the brightness of the firmament, and 
 they that turn many to righteousness as the stars for ever 
 and ever (xii. 1-4). The future of the nation is thus con- 
 nected with the doctrine of the resurrection which the Jews 
 had recently adopted. The resurrection would be confined 
 to Israelites, but should be a blessing only for the righteous ; 
 that is, those who remained faithful to the national religion.
 
 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 321 
 
 The apostates should be overwhelmed with contempt. The 
 abode of the new congregation was to be on the earth, but 
 under what local conditions is not said ; it was sufficient 
 that there should be victory and happiness. It does not 
 appear whether the writer supposed that all other nations 
 were to be set aside, so that the earth should be the pos- 
 session of the Jews alone ; into details on this point he 
 does not enter. There is a judgment (vii.) which overthrows 
 all enemies, and gives the kingdom to the saints ; J but the 
 picture is vague. We do not know the precise nature of 
 the resulting world-society. The ethical element in the life 
 of the restored nation is the same as in the prophets. No 
 earthly leader is named ; there is no Messiah ; the regen- 
 erating influence is in the body of the pious. One would 
 expect reference to Judas ; the book was perhaps written 
 by one of the Hasidim or saints who regarded themselves 
 as the true life of the national struggle (between 167 and 
 164 B. c.). The writer expects the consummation in a short 
 while (xii. 11-13). He is explicit and detailed in his state- 
 ments up to near the death of Antiochus, after which he 
 becomes general and vague (xii. 9). The book is therefore 
 simply the expression of the hope that God was about to en- 
 dow his people with the happiness promised in the prophets. 
 Two things are especially noticeable in this picture of na- 
 tional reconstruction. One is the character and function of 
 the body of the righteous who are to constitute the new 
 national life. It is the idea of a remnant which is found 
 in Isa. vii.-x., but with a more definite and prominent state- 
 ment of its ethical perfectness ; the righteous are wholly 
 righteous, altogether approved by God. They suffer ; but 
 there is no explanation of their suffering. It is not puri- 
 
 1 Here apparently (vii. 27 ; ii. 44) is the germ of the expression " kingdom 
 of heaven," or " kingdom of God," which afterwards came to be the name of 
 the Messianic era. 
 
 21
 
 322 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 
 
 fyiug, as in Isa. xl., or vicarious, as in Isa. liii. ; it is accepted 
 as a fact without inquiry. The writer's eye is fixed simply 
 on the coming reward, and his conception of righteousness 
 is the legal-ritual one which had grown up since the fifth 
 century. The second point is the author's indifference to 
 the political idea. Of course he says nothing of civil lib- 
 erty; this was a question into which the Jews never en- 
 tered. It was left to Greece and Home to develop this 
 side of social life ; Israel dealt with religion only. Nor 
 does the author think of the form of government any more 
 than did prophets, psalmists, and apostles. The one thing 
 for the nation, in his view, was national independence and 
 exaltation over other peoples, which should carry with it 
 the supremacy of the national Law. For the welfare of 
 other nations he is not concerned ; his is that intense de- 
 votion to one idea that was so important an element in 
 the success of the Jews. 
 
 It is a little later that we must put the prediction in the 
 Sibylline Oracles (iii. 652794), in which substantially the 
 same picture is given as in Daniel : foreign kings attack 
 the land and the temple ; they are judged and crushed ; 
 there are signs in heaven ; terror prevails over the whole 
 earth ; the people, delivered from enemies, dwell in peace ; 
 other nations adopt the worship of the God of Israel ; the 
 world shares the blessings of the chosen nation ; there is to 
 be universal freedom from suffering ; Greece is exhorted to 
 pray submissively to God, who was about to establish an 
 everlasting kingdom of peace. The allusion is most prob- 
 ably to the Maccabean struggle ; but the Sibyl differs from 
 Daniel in looking for a king who should rule in the fear 
 and by the help of God, a trait taken from the prophets, 
 and especially suggested, perhaps, by the existing Macca- 
 bean rulers and the writers familiarity with Greek king- 
 doms. The king has no supernatural endowments ; he is
 
 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 323 
 
 simply one of the people. He is not the Messiah in the 
 later significance of the word. There is the same ignoring 
 
 w O O 
 
 of the political problem proper as in Daniel, but more recog- 
 nition of the personality of foreign peoples, that is to say, 
 of the one alien people with which the writer was in con- 
 tact, a difference that came from the more cosmopolitan 
 spirit of the Egyptian Jewish colony. As to the hope of 
 an independent Jewish state, this was made possible and 
 was doubtless suggested by the innumerable strifes between 
 the various Greek kingdoms of Asia and Africa. The Mac- 
 cabean movement had succeeded, and might sustain itself. 
 Jewish enthusiasm has always ignored seemingly insuper- 
 able difficulties. It is nevertheless remarkable, when from 
 our point of view we survey the historical situation, to find 
 this political vitality in a tiny fragment of the Grseco-Eoman 
 world, while at the same time the scribes were building up 
 a compact and powerful ethical-religious organization. 
 
 A further step in the elaboration of the picture of the 
 future is taken in Enoch xc. 16-38, a passage which be- 
 longs to the same general period as the one above cited. 
 The author gives a review, couched in symbolical language, 
 of the history of Israel, and comes finally to the time when 
 the people were devoured by the Greeks. He describes the 
 rise of the Hasidim, and the appearance of a great, victo- 
 rious leader, who is probably Judas Maccabeus (but held by 
 some to be John Hyrcanus the First ; the difference in time 
 is not important for the idea). Then comes the final gen- 
 eral attack of the enemies of Israel, their overthrow by God, 
 the judgment of the angels and of the unfaithful Israelites, 
 and the establishment of the new Jerusalem grander and 
 more beautiful than the old. Then the Messiah appears, one 
 of the people, not a supernatural personage, yet wielding 
 authority over all the nations. t The advance in the thought 
 is the greater prominence given to the person of the Mes-
 
 324 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 
 
 siah, who, however, is not the author of the deliverance (that 
 is effected by God), but comes forward after its completion. 
 The ethical element is the same as in the Sibyl, but the 
 greater prominence is given to the political deliverance. It 
 seemed to the writer that the old glories of the Davidic 
 kingdom might now be renewed, and other nations might 
 share the blessing by submitting to Israel. 
 
 In addition to this purely national expectation, Enoch 
 has the representation of a general judgment (i. ; xxii. 11; 
 Ixxxiv. 4), the result of which shall be the destruction of 
 evil and the constitution of the just into a blessed congre- 
 gation for the worship of the one only God. In the chap- 
 ter quoted above, also (xc.), there is a judgment of evil 
 angels and renegade Jews (20-27), while the heathen op- 
 pressors are converted to the worship of the God of Israel 
 (33). Whether these two judgments are identical is not 
 clear; the first seems to be held on Sinai (i. 4), the second 
 in Palestine (xc. 20). Nor is anything said in the second 
 account of judgment of a punishment to be inflicted on 
 human enemies. 1 There is the same vagueness here as in 
 Daniel. But the general result, according to both books, 
 seems to be that at a certain moment God intervenes, de- 
 stroys all opposition to his people, and establishes them 
 (restoring the dead to life) in security in Palestine, making 
 Jerusalem (a new Jerusalem, according to Enoch) the centre 
 of religious worship for the world. It was a wave of Mes- 
 sianic feeling produced by the apparently brilliant outcome 
 of the Hasmonean uprising. 
 
 1 We have here probably nothing more than a repetition of the prophetic 
 pictures. Isa. Ix. represents kings as coming to pay homage to the glori- 
 fied Israel ; of a judgment on them nothing is said. Other prophets, as Joel 
 (followed by Daniel and the Sibyl), think of a sentence of condemnation 
 and destruction passed on alien nations. The details of the future were dif- 
 ferently construed by different seer; the main thing was the triumph of 
 Israel.
 
 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 325 
 
 The hopes excited by the first Maccabean successes grad- 
 ually vanished amid the experiences of a petty kingdom. 
 So long as the Hasrnonean dynasty retained its position, the 
 dream of independence might seem to be realized, and Sad- 
 ducees and Pharisees were content to struggle with each 
 other for the control of affairs. For nearly a century the 
 Jews were absorbed in internal and external political and 
 religious dissensions, and we hear nothing of apocalyptic 
 visions. With the approach of the Romans under Pompey 
 the cry for deliverance made itself heard again. In the 
 Psalter of Solomon (c. B. c. 48) we find the prayer that God 
 would raise up Israel's king, the son of David, Christ, Lord, 
 to destroy his people's enemies, to reign over all the earth, 
 to make Jerusalem the centre of worship for the whole 
 world (Ps. xvii). Here for the first time the deliverer is 
 called the Anointed, the Messiah, the Christ. It is the old 
 prophetic hope without apocalyptic details. 
 
 A passage in the Sibylline Oracles (iii. 36-62), which 
 appears to belong to the time of the Second Triumvirate 
 (B. c. 43 or 42), announces the speedy establishment of the 
 kingdom of God. A much more developed view is given 
 in the Parables of the book of Enoch (xxxvii.-lxxi.), espe- 
 cially in the second Parable (xlv. Ivii., omitting the Noachic 
 interpolation, liv. 7-lv. 2), which, from the mention of the 
 Parthians (Ivi. 5), probably a reference to the Parthian in- 
 vasion of Palestine, may be put near the year B. c. 40. 
 Here the general judgment is committed by the Lord of 
 the spirits, the Head of days (Dan. vii. 9), to the Messiah, 
 who is called, after Daniel, the Sou of Man, but is more 
 commonly styled the Chosen One. The judgment is directed 
 against the kings and other potentates who oppressed Israel, 
 herein following the prophets, and differing from the earlier 
 part of Enoch. The situation had changed during the past 
 century. Israel triumphant and hopeful might be magnan-
 
 326 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 
 
 imous ; crushed and weary, it would naturally be severe. 
 There is to be a general resurrection. Glory and honor 
 are to accrue to the holy and just (that is, faithful Israel- 
 ites), and they are to dwell on the renovated earth. The 
 most striking point in the description is the apparent ascrip- 
 tion of pre-existence to the Messiah. His name was called, 
 it is said, and he was chosen and hidden before the world 
 was made ; and he will continue to exist forever. It is not 
 clear, however, whether this pre-existence was real or ideal. 
 The idea of prenatal calling is not foreign to the Old Testa- 
 ment : the prophet Jeremiah was set apart to his work be- 
 fore he was born (Jer. i. 5, and cf. Isa. xlix. 5) ; and we may 
 have here the conception of the later Jewish theology, that 
 the Messiah existed indeed from eternity in the divine pur- 
 pose, but came into real being only when he was manifested 
 to the world. 1 With this view would accord the statement 
 of the Parable (xlviii. 7), that the wisdom of God revealed 
 the Messiah [in the day of judgment or divine intervention] 
 to the holy and just, in order that their portion might be 
 preserved. The epithet "chosen" may have been suggested 
 by such a passage as Isa. xlii. 1 (as the whole of the section 
 xlii. 1-17 seems to have furnished material for later Mes- 
 sianic systems), and represents in general an idea familiar 
 to the Jews. The conception of pre-existence, thus stated 
 ideally, prepared the way for the more definite view of Paul 
 and the Fourth Gospel. 2 In other regards the Messianic 
 scheme of the Parables agrees substantially with that of the 
 earlier books. Nothing is said of atonement. There is no 
 
 1 For the Targnmic and Talmndic references see Weber, " System," 
 78, 79. 
 
 2 For the discussion of the question whether this part of the Parables is 
 of Christian origin see Drummond, Schodde, Schurer. On page 65 I say 
 that the role assigned the Messiah seems to point to a Christian source ; 
 but further consideration has led me to change my opinion on this point. A 
 Christian writer would probably have made his statements more definite.
 
 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 327 
 
 feeling of international comity. The kingdom of God is 
 understood in a purely national way ; and while the whole 
 view of the future involves the ordinary ethical elements, 
 the Messiah is in himself not specifically an ethical power. 
 
 The remaining literature of the pre-Christian period pre- 
 sents no new elements of the Messianic hope. The Assump- 
 tion of Moses (x.), written about the beginning of our era, 
 represents the kingdom of God as about to be established, 
 heralded by signs in the heavens and on the earth, and 
 Israel victorious and honored. The Book of Jubilees, half 
 a century later, has only a very general picture of deliver- 
 ance (i.). A little earlier, Philo in two passages already 
 cited (ii. 435, 421-428) describes the political and moral re- 
 demption of the people under the leadership of an eminent 
 man who cannot be the logos, but may be the Messiah. 
 Philo apparently knew nothing of Jesus, whose contempo- 
 rary he was, and he has very little to say of the fortunes 
 of his people ; yet it appears that to him also, immersed 
 as he was in philosophical speculation, the idea of national 
 deliverance was not wanting. 
 
 In estimating the elements of the national hope, we must, 
 however, not lose sight of the moral progress which is to 
 be traced in the non-apocalyptic writings, in the Wisdom- 
 books, and the teachings of the schools. The apocalypses 
 undertook to define the religious-political future with more 
 or less distinctness ; and though their specific predictions 
 were set aside from time to time by the march of events, 
 their general expectation of national deliverance was doubt- 
 less shared by the body of the people. Antiochus Epiphanes 
 died ; the Hasmonean princes ruled ; but there was no real- 
 ization of the dream of a world-kingdom. Judea remained 
 a petty province, felt the weight of the Ptoman power, and 
 passed into the hands of an Idumean king. The people con- 
 tinued to hope against hope. Meantime the intellectual-
 
 328 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 
 
 religious life went on, the moral consciousness of the nation 
 gathered force, and formed part of the national hope. The 
 dream of political independence was never abandoned, but 
 it could not be divorced from that moral ideal which had 
 arisen out of all the experiences of the past centuries. 
 
 To sum up the Messianic material in pre-Christian liter- 
 ature : the fundamental element is the destruction or coer- 
 cion of Israel's enemies, and the establishment of the people 
 in Palestine in political independence and prosperity, some- 
 times by the immediate act of God, sometimes by means of 
 a king or other leader, a man sprung from the people, but 
 raised up by God and endowed with all the qualities neces- 
 sary to secure success ; at the same time the worship of the 
 God of Israel receives universal recognition, and Jerusalem 
 becomes the religious centre of the regenerated world, the 
 new heavens and earth. 
 
 The condition of membership in the new community is 
 twofold : national and religious. It is, first of all, Israelites 
 who are entitled to the blessing, but only faithful Israelites. 
 The stress is laid on devotion to the national faith ; general 
 obedience to the laws of morality is assumed, but not em- 
 phasized. Others than Israelites may become sharers in the 
 advantages of the new dispensation by accepting the na- 
 tional Jewish religion. To these the same sort of moral 
 test is applied as to Jews. 1 If, however, they do not sub- 
 
 1 Proselytism was an anticipation of this procedure. It seems to have 
 begun in the latter half of the first century B. c. (John Hyrcanus's forcible 
 conversion of the Idumeans was a purely political measure, but may be re- 
 garded as the indication of a tendency). Judaism was one of several Africo- 
 Asiatic religions that then attracted the Graeco-Roman world. Though it 
 repelled by its local and oppressive ritual, it attracted by its moral-religious 
 purity and strennousness, and by the hopes it held out for the future. Juda- 
 ism thus took one step toward denationalizing itself. Hillel (and probably 
 one section of the Egyptian Jews) was very liberal in the construction of 
 the terms of admission. Under favorable circumstances, it seemed, Judaism 
 might throw off its local character and become a world-religion ; and this 
 it actually did become in the form of Christianity.
 
 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 329 
 
 mit they are to be punished. 1 As to whether they will 
 submit or prove obstinate, this is variously decided ; arid 
 the question is complicated by the introduction of the con- 
 ception of a judgment and a future life. This judgment, 
 represented sometimes as held by God, sometimes as held 
 by the Messiah, ushers in the Messianic era, and the chosen 
 people dwell on the earth. But the conception of the future 
 life was in process of formulation, and the mode in which 
 the heathen are to be dealt with is not stated precisely. 
 In one point, however, all shades of opinion agree : there 
 is to be endless triumph for the people of Israel and their 
 religion. 
 
 In the New Testament we find mention of several points 
 in the popular belief, which do not appear in the Jewish lit- 
 erature, such as that the Messiah was to be born in Beth- 
 lehem (Matt, ii.) ; that when he appeared no one would 
 know whence he came ; that he would work miracles ; that 
 he would be preceded by Elijah or Jeremiah or some un- 
 named prophet (Matt. xi. 3, 10, 11 ; xvi. 13, 14; xvii. 10, 11 ; 
 John vii. 27, 31, 40-42). It is evident, from Dan. ix. as 
 well as from the New Testament, that the pious and the 
 scribes had for some time been searching the sacred books 
 for predictions of the great deliverance. As soon as the 
 idea of an individual Messiah was established, ardent men 
 would see a reference to him, a description of his person 
 or of the circumstances of his coming, in many a passage 
 of the Scripture. Doubtless many such Messianic allusions 
 were current among the people that do not appear in the 
 New Testament. 2 That Bethlehem was to be the birthplace 
 
 1 The same thing in Islam. Mohammedan preachers still continue, in the 
 Friday mosque-service, to invoke the divine vengeance on the unbelieving 
 oppressor. 
 
 2 The Talmud contains all this material and much more of similar char- 
 acter, part of which probably goes back to the first century of our era. See 
 Weber's " System," Edersheim's " Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah,"
 
 330 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 
 
 of the deliverer was inferred from Mic. v. 2 (1) ; that his 
 appearance was to be mysterious, perhaps from Mai. iii. 1 ; 
 his power of working miracles might be suggested by such 
 passages as Isa. xxxv. 5, or might be regarded as a neces- 
 sary accompaniment of his exalted mission, since the proph- 
 ets Elijah and Elisha and others were endowed with this 
 power ; Mai. iv. 5 (iii. 23) seems to say that Elijah would 
 be the forerunner of the grand catastrophe ; the great rule 
 assigned to Jeremiah appears from 2 Mac. ii. 1-8, 1 xv. 13- 
 15 ; and the important parts played by him and other proph- 
 ets (as Isaiah) in the old history may explain the position 
 given them in the current Messianic theories. 2 It appears 
 also from the Gospels that the Messianic hope was gen- 
 erally diffused among the people and excited lively inter- 
 est. The same thing may be inferred from the local polit- 
 ical revolts which took place from time to time during the 
 first century of our era. There must have been an under- 
 current of deep Messianic feeling in Palestine. The social- 
 religious life went for the most part quietly on. The people 
 bought and sold, the scribes worked out the minutiae of 
 the law, the priests officiated in the temple ; but under 
 this outward acceptance of the Roman rule there was in 
 
 Drummond's " Jewish Messiah," Duschak's " Biblisch-talmudische Glaubens- 
 lehre " 
 
 1 The author refers vaguely to earlier material for the source of his legend 
 of Jeremiah, a story which, thus accidentally preserved, suggests that there 
 were others of the same sort which have been lost. 
 
 2 Neither in the pre-Christian Jewish literature nor in the earlier Targums 
 is there any trace of a suffering Messiah. The idea of a non-expiatory suffer- 
 ing, which appears in the Talmud, and is attributed to the Jews by Justin 
 Martyr (Trypho, Ixviii. Ixxxix.), may have existed as early as the first cen- 
 tury or earlier. The conception of an expiatory suffering of the Messiah, 
 which might naturally be suggested by Isa. liii., is found in later works, but 
 was foreign to the reigning Jewish thought, and has never taken hold of 
 Jewish feeling. On the other hand, that the righteous may turn away the 
 divine wrath from their friends and from the nation is an idea familiar to 
 the Old Testament as well as to the Talmud. Weber, " System," chs. xx. 
 xxii., Schiirer, " Geschichte," pp. 464 ff.
 
 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 331 
 
 the first century, as there had often been before, an eager 
 hope, a latent expectation that God was about to interpose, 
 that the man would soon appear who should lead Israel 
 to glory. 
 
 6. But there was more than this. The materials for 
 tracing the history of Messianic thought during the fifty 
 years preceding the birth of Jesus are scanty. We have a 
 few psalms, a few somewhat vague verses in the Sibylline 
 oracles, the Enoch-Parables, and some detached ethical-legal 
 sayings of prominent lawyers. The country was in a state 
 of unrest ; the reign of Herod was marked by conflicts with- 
 out and disorders within. Quiet was restored by the ban- 
 ishment of Archelaus, and the final incorporation of Pal- 
 estine into the Eoman Empire under a procurator; but it 
 was only an external and partial quiet. The people were 
 wearied and sore at heart. It was not a time for literary 
 production ; yet during this period the seeds of a great 
 religious revolution were germinating. In the absence of 
 specific historical information, we can only conjecture the 
 causes which produced in the more serious minds a pro- 
 founder view of the political-religious situation. One of 
 these we may judge to be the recognition of the hopeless- 
 ness of a struggle against the power of the Eoman Empire. 
 There had been for a long time in the higher circles of 
 Jewish society a pronounced aversion to political revolt. 
 The Sadducees were content with their position as aristo- 
 cratic representatives of the old religious order, especially 
 as they freely adopted the broader social ideas and habits 
 of their cultivated neighbors ; the Pharisees were absorbed 
 in the elaboration of the Law on its ceremonial and eth- 
 ical sides, holding this to be the real life of the nation, 
 anxious mainly for the quiet necessary to do their legal 
 work, willing to accept any government which left them in 
 peace. One result of this recognition of the existing order
 
 332 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 
 
 of things we may suppose to have been an enfeebling of 
 the desire for political sovereignty, and in so far a modifi- 
 cation of the old Messianic scheme. 
 
 In addition to this, there was the recognition of the neces- 
 sity of moral reform. It is likely that this feeling of the 
 ethical shortcomings of the nation, handed down from the 
 prophets, had never been entirely wanting. There was a 
 time, indeed (as we see from such writings as Ps. xliv.), 
 when there existed in certain circles a consciousness of na- 
 tional righteousness ; but this was mainly the expression 
 of Israel's devotion to the one true God and his law, in 
 contrast with the idolatry and lawlessness of neighboring 
 nations. No serious mind could fail to perceive the eth- 
 ical defects of Jewish society. We need not suppose that 
 these exceeded the bounds of ordinary human weakness. 
 Then, as now, there was enough self-seeking, untruth- 
 fulness, hypocrisy, oppression, to call forth the severest 
 condemnation of moral-religious teachers. Perhaps the dis- 
 orders of the times intensified the feeling of ethical dissat- 
 isfaction. The assiduous study of the prophets forced on 
 reflecting minds the conviction that an inward change was 
 necessary before the people could receive the long-promised 
 divine blessing. The first condition of God's aid, it might 
 naturally be felt, was a moral-religious reform. One other 
 step might have been taken. To a profounder spiritual 
 soul it might seem that the essence of the divine salvation 
 would be faithful obedience to the law of God. This was, 
 indeed, the new covenant of Jeremiah and Ezekiel ; and 
 this was the characteristic of the ideal Israel, which, accord- 
 ding to the exilian Isaiah, was to be the bearer of truth 
 and light to the world. Such a view would not neces- 
 sarily exclude (as in the prophets it did not exclude) the 
 conception of a special divine interposition in the future ; 
 but it would transform the scheme of God's earthly king-
 
 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 333 
 
 dom from a political sovereignty to a society organized on 
 moral-religious principles. Such thoughts as these may have 
 floated, more or less vaguely, in the more serious and reflec- 
 tive minds in the century preceding the birth of John the 
 Baptist. There are hints that such an ethical view of the 
 situation, though doubtless feeble and indistinct, actually ex- 
 isted among the people. Of this nature was the expectation, 
 derived from the conclusion of Malachi's prophecy, that Eli- 
 jah, in the role of moral reformer, would precede the final 
 interposition of God ; and according to John iv. 25, there 
 was a belief that the Messiah when he came would solve 
 all religious problems. We may point also to the moral 
 earnestness of Hillel's reported sayings, to the profound de- 
 sire for personal purity which was embodied in the Essene 
 organization, and in general to all those moral elements in 
 the idea of the kingdom of God which are mentioned above. 
 If such a feeling existed in Palestine at that time, we can- 
 not be surprised at the appearance of a man like John the 
 Baptist. Of his antecedents we know nothing; he appears 
 suddenly in Judea as a preacher of repentance and a herald 
 of the approach of the kingdom of God. More than this he 
 did not claim to be. He rebuked the sins of all classes of 
 society (Mark i., Matt, iii., Luke iii.) ; he met his death by 
 his denunciation of the immoral conduct of King Herod 
 (Mark vi. 17-29). His silence is as significant as his utter- 
 ance. In his reported words he says nothing of a political 
 kingdom, he draws no detailed picture of the future ; he con- 
 fines himself to moral exhortation. For him the kingdom of 
 God seems to be simply the purification of the national life. 
 How far he shared the prevailing views respecting this king- 
 dom it is perhaps impossible to say. The sober report of his 
 preaching in the Synoptics may be due to a process of sifting 
 by a later generation when Christian ideas prevailed. But it 
 is still noteworthy that he by no word suggests other than a
 
 334 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 
 
 inoral-religious role for the Messiah, and that no record con- 
 nects him or his followers with any political movement. 1 
 
 He was the last of the prophets. He had the thorough- 
 going, uncompromising decision and fearlessness of Elijah, 
 whom he seems to have taken as his model in dress and 
 demeanor. Like Elijah, he worked only for present reforma- 
 tion within the bounds of the national religious organization. 
 He hoped for a coming kingdom of God, but he did not cher- 
 ish the brilliant anticipations of the writing prophets. He 
 did not think of himself as the person destined to introduce 
 the new dispensation of things. He felt that while he was 
 a preacher of righteousness, a stronger arm than his was 
 needed to establish the perfect divine society. He spoke of 
 a successor, who should complete what he had begun, who 
 should baptize 2 not with water but with the Holy Spirit. 3 
 Who this successor was to be he seems never to have known. 
 After he was thrown into prison by Herod, he heard of the 
 new teacher whose fame had spread throughout the land, 
 and sent messengers to him to ask if it was he that should 
 come, or whether they were still to expect some other. The 
 tone of the question implies ignorance on John's part of the 
 
 1 What Josephus says of him agrees substantially with the statements in 
 the Gospels. 
 
 2 Schneckenbiirger and others hold that the baptism of John was a new 
 ceremony, not borrowed from the Jews, and I took the same position in an 
 article on proselyte-baptism in " The Baptist Quarterly " (1872) ; but it now 
 seems to me that the facts favor the opposite view. 
 
 3 The incident recorded in Acts xix. 1-7 seems to show that a theory of 
 immediate divine influence did not exist among the disciples of John. If 
 in verse 3 we are to translate, " We have not even heard whether there is a 
 Holy Spirit," it must be concluded either that John said nothing about such 
 a divine power, or, as is more probable, that these particular disciples had 
 failed to receive the proper information. It seems unlikely, however, that 
 any disciple of John could be ignorant of the existence of the Spirit of God, 
 a common Jewish idea of the time, or without the hope of that out- 
 pouring which was promised by the prophets (Joel iii.). The alternative ren- 
 dering, " whether the Holy Spirit is " (harsh, but not impossible), would imply 
 only that these disciples did not know of the pouring out of the Spirit.
 
 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 335 
 
 person and purpose of the young master, who had indeed 
 been baptized by him, but had been undistinguished in the 
 crowd. 1 For answer Jesus simply pointed to what he was 
 doing (Matt. xi.). It is not said what conclusion John drew 
 from this response. Jesus expressed his own opinion of John 
 in a very decided manner. According to the First Gospel, he 
 declared that John was more than a prophet ; that no greater 
 man than he had yet appeared in the history of Israel ; and 
 at a later period, when the Pharisees demanded the source 
 of his authority, he replied by asking whether they looked 
 on John's mission as deriving its authority from men or from 
 God. They were unwilling to commit themselves to a defi- 
 nite answer, and he therefore declined to answer their ques- 
 tion ; but he evidently placed himself in the same category 
 with John so far as the authority of his mission was con- 
 cerned (Matt. xi. 7-19 ; xxi. 23-32). 2 
 
 John died without having witnessed any great forward 
 movement in the people. His disciples continued to exist 
 in the form of a sect for a considerable time (Acts xix. 3), 
 but apparently without exerting any considerable influence 
 on the community. They had little to affect the popular 
 imagination, or stir to action. We should suppose that they 
 all would have taken Jesus for their teacher after the death 
 of John ; yet they not only retained their separate organ- 
 ization, but according to Matt. ix. 14, in certain customs, as 
 fasting, they were nearer to the Pharisees than to the dis- 
 ciples of Jesus. 3 They seem to have represented little more 
 than a somewhat dull moral reform. Perhaps they were also 
 looking for a Messiah ; but if so, their expectation was un- 
 defined, and stirred no great hopes among the people. John's 
 
 1 The incident mentioned in Mark i. 10, 11, is an addition of the later tra- 
 dition. If John had witnessed it, he would not have sent such a message. 
 
 2 Cf. Maurice Vernes, " Histoire des Ide'es Messianiques," Paris, 1874. 
 
 3 From this fact it may reasonably be inferred that John had said nothing 
 of Jesus to his disciples, and was unacquainted with the ideas of his successor.
 
 336 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 
 
 movement was completely swallowed up in that of Jesus, 
 and left no traces, as far as we can perceive, in the develop- 
 ment of the nation. It was a real response to the demand 
 of the times, but not strong and deep enough to furnish all 
 that was needed. It was the last attempt of the old pro- 
 phetic thought to guide the religious life of the nation, and 
 it proved a failure. The body of the nation continued its 
 nomistic development, while the disciples of Jesus threw off 
 the Law. The Johannites neither attained to any deep spir- 
 ituality nor affected the growth of the nomism to which they 
 continued to cling. 
 
 John may be called, in a peculiar sense, a Jewish product, 
 the outcome of the national development. Of pure, unmixed 
 nationalism, indeed, we cannot speak, for the Jewish thought 
 of the time, as we have seen, was all colored more or less by 
 foreign influences. But John seems to represent particularly 
 a circle which held to the traditional moral-religious ideas. 
 His was a sturdy, outspoken ethical system. He lashed the 
 vices of the time ; he denounced the leaders of orthodoxy 
 as a brood of vipers. He had the moral insight of a true 
 reformer, and he had further the power of genius or the 
 skill to separate the local from the general in the prophetic 
 teaching. He is even reported (Matt. iii. 9) as anticipating 
 the Apostle Paul in discarding the national and hereditary 
 claim to the divine favor, and looking, as it seems, in part, 
 outside of Israel for the membership of the kingdom of God. 1 
 In so far his work was an attempt to convert Judaism into 
 a universal religion. He lacked enthusiasm for humanity, 
 tenderness of sympathy, breadth and depth of ethical prin- 
 ciple. He seems to have aroused interest in all classes of 
 
 1 The partial rejection of Israel is an old prophetic idea (Am. iii. 2 ; Isa 
 x. 22), and a certain sort of incoming of Gentiles was early looked forward to 
 (Isa. lx.). Whether the word ascribed to John is simply a repetition of this 
 old prediction (cf. Mark xii. 9), only in a more definite way, or the reflection 
 of a later time, it is difficult to say.
 
 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 337 
 
 Jewish society (Matt. iii. 5-7), but he was overborne by the 
 current of the times. He is a witness to a definitely Jew- 
 ish demand for moral reform. 
 
 The desire for reform was, however, not confined to the 
 Jews, but made itself felt throughout the Grseco-Eoman 
 world. This is not the place to describe in detail the intel- 
 lectual-moral condition of society in the Eoman empire at 
 the beginning of the first century of our era. 1 That a nota- 
 ble current of ethical feeling then existed in the western 
 world appears from the writings of Cicero, Juvenal, Persius, 
 Plutarch, Seneca, and others. These men not only attack the 
 grosser moral evils of their time, but set up a high moral 
 standard, and embody the striving after an ideal which they 
 are conscious has not been reached by society. This deeper 
 moral sentiment was practically the same all over the em- 
 pire, expressed under different social and religious conditions 
 and in different ways, yet looking everywhere to the one end 
 of the purification and ennobling of life. Juvenal is a sort 
 of Roman John the Baptist ; Seneca has noteworthy points 
 of ethical agreement with Paul. The Eoman world was in 
 an important sense a unit, full of diversities, indeed, but 
 informed by a great common body of moral feeling which 
 was fed by streams from all the great civilized communities. 
 The various ethical tendencies had sprung out of the social 
 conditions of various independent nations, and had come 
 to form one mass of opinion through the series of events 
 which, beginning with the Assyrian, Babylonian, and Per- 
 sian conquests, had finally, through Greece and Eome, im- 
 pressed political and social unity on a huge congeries of 
 communities. The essential oneness of human moral expe- 
 rience had shown itself in the ethical results achieved by 
 
 1 It is described in the works of Baur, Schurer, and Hausrath, and in Dul- 
 linger's " Heidenthum und Judenthum " (Eng. transl. "The Gentile and the 
 Jew "). 
 
 22
 
 338 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 
 
 these various peoples, and one of these results was the estab- 
 lishment of a higher ideal. In order to discern clearly why 
 a special ethical-religious movement should have set in just 
 at this time, we should have to make a minute examination 
 of the moral phenomena of the age, an inquiry too large 
 for our present purpose. But two great and generally recog- 
 nized facts present themselves distinctly in the history of 
 the period, and furnish a not unsatisfactory answer to our 
 question. One of these is the wide and intimate intercourse 
 between members of different peoples, which had helped to 
 break down artificial barriers between men and promote the 
 sense of human brotherhood ; the other is the rupture which 
 had taken place between the common-sense of the Grseco- 
 Roman world and the old mythologies, driving men back 
 on fundamental principles of religion and morals. AYe must 
 content ourselves here with the bare mention of these facts, 
 without attempting to illustrate them by examples or trace 
 them to their origin. 
 
 Reform, it may be said, was in the air. Reform is, in- 
 deed, a constant element of a healthy community ; but there 
 are special movements in special directions, as in this case. 
 Different nations moreover, differ in methods and capacity 
 of reform. Especially does the power of organization vary 
 in different communities. The organized force of Greece ex- 
 pended itself in literature and philosophy, that of Rome in 
 politics and law, that of Israel in religion. Greece specially 
 affected ethics through philosophy, Rome through govern- 
 ment. The Jews had organized religion, and their religion 
 became constantly more ethical ; Ilillel surpassed Isaiah in 
 distinctness of moral view. The conception of a society 
 organized on the basis of ethical religion was peculiar to 
 Jewish thought. The idea had been developed by prophets 
 and lawyers continuously from Elijah and Amos to Hillel 
 and John the Baptist. This was the advantage that Israel
 
 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 339 
 
 had over Greece and Rome at the beginning of our era : 
 it was not that its ethical principles and life were essen- 
 tially purer, but that its capacity for ethical-religious organ- 
 ization was greater. It was able to employ in the most 
 effective way the universal motives of religion as an eth- 
 ical lever. Having a simple and elevated religion, it could 
 unite religion and ethics into a harmonious and powerful 
 principle of life. John the Baptist endeavored to carry out 
 the prophetic idea of reform under the conditions of his 
 own time, but the result showed that he was not equal to 
 the task he assumed. He definitely impressed neither his 
 own people nor foreigners ; at most he produced in Judea 
 a moral excitement which prepared the way for his suc- 
 cessor. A deeper conception of life and a stronger person- 
 ality were needed to create a new starting-point for the 
 religious-ethical forces of the world. 
 
 Jesus apparently began his career as a disciple of John. 
 But while he was well acquainted with the Baptist's con- 
 ception of the kingdom of God, he seems to have had no 
 intimate personal intercourse with him. He began his own 
 preaching after John's arrest ; and it was in prison that 
 John's attention was for the first time directed to the work 
 of the new teacher. Jesus' idea of the divine kingdom was 
 substantially the same as that of his predecessor. Both laid 
 the chief stress on moral reformation within the Jewish 
 nation ; both contemplated the maintenance of the national 
 organization and the perfecting of the nation into an in- 
 strument for the establishment of the kingdom. But if the 
 two men started together, their paths soon diverged. The 
 profounder spirituality of Jesus led to an independence of 
 thought and teaching which overshadowed and obliterated 
 the work of the older man. Jesus himself retained the deep- 
 est respect for John, though he came to regard his work as 
 preparatory and temporary (Matt. xi. 7-19). The defects of
 
 340 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 
 
 John's teaching will be apparent from the statement of the 
 characteristics of the work of Jesus. 
 
 The movement which Jesus began was distinctly and pre- 
 dominatingly a moral-spiritual one. From all his utterances 
 we may infer that he held the one need of the times to be 
 ethical regeneration, and that he conceived this regeneration 
 from a religious point of view as resting on a friendly rela- 
 tion of the soul with God. From the beginning to the end 
 of his career, he insisted almost exclusively on sincere love 
 of goodness with single-minded regard for the approbation 
 of the heavenly Father. He exposed with a word the moral 
 sophistries of the scribes ; he made clear the distinction be- 
 tween the ethical and the ceremonial ; he denounced hy- 
 pocrisy and time-serving ; he pointed out the weakness of 
 imperfect moral principle, and he held up to view those 
 fundamental principles which were capable of deciding all 
 moral questions over against the perversions of custom and 
 casuistry and the feebleness of the human heart. His eth- 
 ical teaching may be regarded as summed up in the Sermon 
 on the Mount ; and the Sermon consists of ethical -religious 
 thought pervaded by the sentiment of loyalty toward God, 
 or rather of perfect trust in him and communion with him. 
 If a man so live, says Jesus, he shall be cared for by the 
 heavenly Father in this world and the next : " Seek ye first 
 his kingdom and his righteousness ; and all these things shall 
 be added " (Matt. vi. 33). Jesus regarded the essence of the 
 kingdom of heaven as consisting in the moral-spiritual life. 
 He differed from John in the emphasis which he laid on 
 the inner life, on complete oneness of spirit with God, out 
 of which naturally flowed the outward manifestation of good 
 works. This combination of the outward life with the in- 
 ward spirit is ultimately the same with Paul's conjunction 
 of faith and works, and with the conception in the Fourth 
 Gospel of regeneration of soul whereby one enters into the
 
 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 341 
 
 kingdom of light. Only the idea of Jesus is simpler than 
 the others. He speaks of no theological or other unusual 
 revolution, but only of a new attitude of soul into which 
 the man comes by his own decision. 
 
 We are not here concerned, however, with the details of 
 Jesus' ethical-spiritual teaching. The point of interest is 
 to note that it is the summing-up of all that we find in 
 Old Testament and New Testament. The prophets had an- 
 nounced the moral basis of the true Israel, and the Epistles 
 portray the high ethical life as the fundamental character- 
 istic of the Church. In a few words Jesus has comprised 
 all that is essential in moral principle, and held it up as the 
 one necessary condition of perfected human society. Even 
 where he does not offer direct solutions of social-moral ques- 
 tions which have arisen since his time, he furnishes the prin- 
 ciples which contain the solution. His teaching stands apart 
 from the political and ecclesiastical relations which we find 
 elsewhere in the Bible. This last point, though hardly a fun- 
 damental one, may be exhibited a little more in detail. 
 
 We have already seen that the political element is prom- 
 inent in all pictures of the kingdom of God in the Jewish 
 literature from Daniel to the end of the first century of 
 our era. The nation was conceived of as a political unit, 
 and nothing but the maintenance of its political life was 
 dreamed of. The Messiah, it was held, would rule over a 
 nation happy in freedom and prosperity ; and, according to 
 one view, it was he who should hold the final judgment 
 which was to settle the destiny of all things. It is a fair 
 question whether or how far Jesus sympathized with this 
 circle of ideas ; and the records of his life, though not free 
 from the coloring of later generations, seem to yield a prob- 
 able answer. As a Jew and a man of his times we should 
 expect him to share the Messianic opinions of his people, 
 and there are indications that this he did in certain points.
 
 342 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 
 
 But, on the other hand, it is evident from his words (taking 
 only those that are commonly agreed to belong to him) and 
 from the historical outcome of his work that he stood above 
 his times in the sense that he recognized and organized the 
 best elements of the world's current thought. If he did this 
 in the sphere of pure morals and religion, it is quite possi- 
 ble that he avoided the grosser part of the Jewish national 
 Messianic faith, and isolated and gave life to its essential 
 spiritual core ; and this is the conclusion to which several 
 sets of facts seem to point. In the first place, as is re- 
 marked above, his teaching, according to the records, is pre- 
 dominatingly ethical-spiritual. The impression made on us 
 is that it was this side of life that most deeply interested 
 him. He is intensely concerned to stimulate men to moral- 
 spiritual broadness and strenuousness. Such overweening in- 
 terest in the higher aspects of the individual and the national 
 life might be expected to carry with it indifference to the 
 lower. This is, however, only a presumption, not a conclu- 
 sive argument. It is conceivable that along with this ex- 
 alted conception of human capacity and function he might 
 have held to the current view of the national deliverance. 
 But we have from him, further, some tolerably specific utter- 
 ances on this point, especially in a series of sayings con- 
 tained in Mark x. (and Matt. xix. xx.). These are, indeed, 
 not entirely accordant one with another, and their precise 
 meaning is not in all cases plain ; but their general drift 
 may be recognized. He declares that the kingdom of God 
 must be received, not with warlike ardor, but with the 
 docility of a little child. Wealthy adherents are usually 
 welcomed by a political leader ; but he simply says in an 
 indifferent tone that it is very hard for a rich man to en- 
 ter the kingdom of God. Exactly what is meant by the 
 saying attributed to him, that those who had made sacrifices 
 in his cause should be amply compensated with friends and
 
 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 343 
 
 worldly possessions, it is not easy to decide, especially as 
 persecution is included in the list of things to be expected, 
 and the "present time" is distinguished from the "coming 
 age," in which everlasting life is to be the portion of the 
 faithful ; but, in any case, it seems to be not a political 
 reward of which he is speaking. Finally, he declares that 
 eminence among his followers is to be of a character wholly 
 distinct from that of ordinary civil lordship, its condition 
 being humility and service. It is true that there are other 
 reported sayings of different import, particularly Matt. xix. 
 28, where it is promised that, when in the new order of 
 things (the "palingenesis") the Son of Man should be en- 
 throned as king, 1 the twelve disciples should exercise a quasi- 
 regal judgeship over the twelve tribes of Israel But this is 
 so distinctly contradictory in spirit of that other saying, "To 
 sit on my right hand and on my left is not mine to give" 
 (Matt. xx. 23 ; Mark x. 40), that it may reasonably be re- 
 garded as a gloss or interpretation put into the mouth of 
 Jesus by a writer who did not understand his words. Re- 
 wards in this life he may have promised ; but they seem to 
 be not the gifts of a worldly king, but the favors which 
 (as in Matt. vi. 33, and in the Old Testament) God bestows 
 on them that trust in him. 
 
 The public entry into Jerusalem, though apparently sug- 
 gested by the word of the prophet Zechariah, "Thy king 
 comes to thee," etc. (Zech. ix. 9), was obviously not meant 
 by Jesus to have political significance. It was intended as 
 an assertion of his Messianic office, and he followed it up 
 by entering the temple and driving out the money-changers, 
 
 1 The same phrase occurs in Enoch xlv. 3, in the description of the judg- 
 ment which is to usher in the final period of blessedness. The expression 
 was probably familiar to Jesus and his disciples as part of a current concep- 
 tion of the Messiah. The question is whether it is likely, from the testimony 
 of the documents, that Jesus employed it of himself. To the generation that 
 followed him such employment would seem perfectly natural.
 
 344 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 
 
 a procedure in which he acted not as king but as prophet. 
 It is quite possible that the people had another idea, and 
 thought of him as a political leader (Mark xi. 810 ; xv. 
 1-20; cf. John vi. 15). But he gave no encouragement to 
 such a scheme. To the very end he held aloof from the 
 employment of physical force. When Judas came to. seize 
 him, one of Jesus' friends drew a sword and struck the 
 slave of the high-priest ; but this was his own act, and had 
 no consequences. 
 
 It seems clear, also, that he was looked on by the authori- 
 ties, both Roman and Jewish, as politically unimportant. It 
 was a restless, excitable time. There had been several up- 
 risings (Acts v. 36, 37), and the Eomans would be ready 
 enough to take note of signs of revolt ; but Pilate, who was 
 not slow to employ military force, treated Jesus as a harm- 
 less enthusiast, and with easy indifference ordered his exe- 
 cution as a convenient means of pleasing the multitude, with 
 whom he was not in good odor. The Pharisees also appear 
 to have feared him, not as a political Messiah, but as an 
 enemy of the Mosaic law (which they believed to be essen- 
 tial to the true life of the nation) and of the order of things 
 from which they derived their consideration. An attempt 
 was made by the Pharisees and the Herodians to entrap him 
 into an expression of disloyalty to the Roman government. 
 We know, said they, that you are concerned only for God's 
 truth. Is it lawful to pay tribute to the Roman government 
 or not? It was the burning question of the time. Should 
 the Jews acknowledge this foreign domination, or should 
 they rise in revolt against it ? Jesus, it is true, knew that 
 these men were not friendly to him, and only wished an 
 opportunity to catch him. If he had had political designs 
 he probably would not have expressed them on this occa- 
 sion ; but his answer, though entirely non-committal in form, 
 could only be understood as recognizing the lawfulness of
 
 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 345 
 
 obedience to the existing government. He pointed to the 
 emperor's image on a coin, and declared that it was right 
 to render to the Eoman government and to God the obe- 
 dience which was the due of each. This is the tone of a 
 man who wished to hold himself aloof from political com- 
 plications. After his death his disciples occupied the same 
 position. Their presence in Jerusalem gave neither Eomans 
 nor Jews anxiety on political grounds. There is no sign of 
 political hopes or schemes among his followers in Jerusalem 
 or elsewhere. The natural explanation of this is that he 
 gave no. ground for such hopes in his teaching ; that he 
 taught only the moral regeneration of society through the 
 announcement of ethical-spiritual truth. 
 
 It is harder to decide whether he intended his teaching 
 to be limited to the Jews ; that is, whether, in harmony 
 with the old prophets and the body of the later literature, 
 lie regarded the Jewish nation as the necessary intermediary 
 between God and the rest of the world. Something like this 
 we should naturally infer from the story of the Syrophce- 
 nician woman (Mark vii. 27), to whom he is reported as 
 saying that it was not meet to take the children's bread and 
 cast it to the dogs. In the First Gospel, when the twelve 
 disciples are sent out to teach, they are charged not to go 
 to Gentiles or Samaritans, but only to Jews (Matt. x. 5, 6) ; 
 but this limitation is not found in Mark or Luke, and we 
 may suspect that it is the addition of a Judaizing editor. 
 On the other hand, he seems not to have confined himself 
 to Jewish territory, but went wherever he had opportunity 
 (Mark vii. 24, 31). The baptismal commission, indeed, con- 
 taining the command to preach to all the nations, does not 
 belong to his teaching proper, but represents the idea of the 
 succeeding generation. Of the same nature, perhaps, is the 
 saying reported in the First Gospel, that many should come 
 from the east and the west to sit down with Abraham, Isaac,
 
 346 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 
 
 and Jacob, while the sons of the kingdom should be cast 
 forth (Matt. viii. 11, 12) ; yet this may be interpreted as 
 meaning, in the sense of the old prophets, that members of 
 other peoples should accept the instruction of Israel, while 
 a portion of the chosen nation should be rejected. And 
 here, probably, we find a suggestion of Jesus' position on 
 this point. His mind filled with the prophetic thought, 
 which conceived of Israel as the centre of enlightenment 
 for the world, it would be natural for him to regard Jewish 
 territory as the starting-point for the religious reconstruction 
 of society. Such was the view of the Old Testament and 
 of the succeeding literature. Salvation was held to be of 
 the Jews (John iy. 22) , only through the Jewish nation 
 as intermediary was it thought possible that other nations 
 could obtain the knowledge of saving truth. Such an opin- 
 ion all the conditions of his training would lead him tp 
 hold ; and that this was really his view may with some 
 probability be inferred from the position of the disciples 
 just after his death, among whom the idea of preaching 
 directly to the Gentiles did not easily find entrance. If 
 he had expressed himself in a universal way, if he had 
 habitually or often spoken of the immediate appeal to the 
 non-Jewish world, these men who had been for several 
 years in intimate association with him would have caught 
 some of this spirit. Their Jewish prejudice was no doubt 
 at the beginning intense ; but it would have yielded to re- 
 peated instructions on the part of the Master whom they 
 revered as a heaven-sent prophet. At the outset they showed 
 not the slightest trace of any such idea. It was Paul, the 
 man who had had no association with Jesus, and in his 
 writings almost ignores his life and teaching, who com- 
 pletely idealized the person of Jesus from a theological 
 point of view, it was this outsider, as he may be called, 
 who conceived and carried out the idea that the announce-
 
 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 347 
 
 ment of the Gospel to the Gentile world was to be made 
 a direct object of effort. This idea he seeins not to have 
 got from Jesus. 
 
 Yet it is conceivable that the Master chose not to bur- 
 den his disciples with instructions for the far future, hold- 
 ing that his immediate mission was to Israel. We must 
 believe, indeed, that he expected the ultimate complete tri- 
 umph of the kingdom of God: such is the teaching of the 
 prophets. But whether he looked to a gradual process of 
 moral leavening by the proclamation of the truth, or to a 
 physical divine intervention, which should coerce alien na- 
 tions, this we have no means of determining with absolute 
 certainty. We can only say that if he conceived of the uni- 
 versality of the Gospel in the Pauline sense, it is strange 
 that they so completely misunderstood him, and that it 
 afterward required so long and hard a struggle to establish 
 this idea in the Church. It seems more probable that his 
 conception of direct reformatory work was limited to the 
 Jewish nation. 
 
 It is in harmony with this statement of his position that 
 he attempted no separate organization of his disciples. He 
 preached to the multitudes wherever he had opportunity, 
 and welcomed all who came to him with serious purpose. 
 He selected a few of the more receptive and earnest, and 
 attached them closely to his person. There is no sign of 
 real distinction between esoteric and exoteric teaching in 
 his life ; 1 but his intercourse with the inner circle of dis- 
 
 1 Such a distinction seems, indeed, to be affirmed in Mark iv. 11, Matt, 
 xiii. 11 , but the "mystery" which is there subsequently expounded is not 
 remarkable either morally-religiously or historically. That is, the ethical part 
 of the explanation of the parables does not differ in spirit and content from 
 other sayings (as the Sermon on the Mount) which appear to have beeu 
 addressed to the people at large ; and what relates to the gradual develop- 
 ment and final establishment of the kingdom of God was neither difficult to 
 understand nor strange to the current ideas of the time. There is a differ- 
 ence between the reports of this group of parables in Mark and in Matthew;
 
 348 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 
 
 ciples was naturally freer and fuller than with the others, 
 and to them, we may suppose, he confided more of the con- 
 tent and spirit of his doctrine. They all remained simply 
 members of the Jewish people, professing faith in Moses 
 and practising all the requirements of the Law. He never 
 spoke of his disciples as forming a sect or party, never estab- 
 lished separate synagogues nor held separate religious meet- 
 ings, never appointed officers nor suggested that they be 
 thereafter appointed. After his death, the disciples were 
 gradually forced into a separate organization ; but the book 
 of Acts gives no hint that they derived the details or the 
 idea itself from him. The word " church '' does indeed occur 
 twice in the First Gospel, but in passages which appear to 
 be later additions. The declaration that the Church is to 
 be founded on Peter (Matt. xvi. 18) is not given in any of 
 the other Gospels, and appears to be an insertion introduced 
 for the purpose of exalting the authority of Peter. It is 
 not quite in accord with Jesus' attitude toward Peter else- 
 where in the Gospels. The provision made for dealing with 
 a perverse brother (Matt, xviii. 17), who, if he refuse to lis- 
 ten to the Church, is to be treated as a heathen and a pub- 
 lican, stands so completely isolated, and is so much out of 
 harmony with other teachings of Jesus, that it also may be 
 regarded as the insertion of a succeeding generation. It is 
 noteworthy that the Synoptic Gospels have nothing to say 
 of baptism in the ministry of Jesus. He himself is said to 
 have been baptized by John ; but there is no mention of 
 the ceremony's having been performed by himself or by his 
 disciples, and in the Fourth Gospel (John iv. 2) it is said 
 that Jesus himself did not baptize, but left this work to his 
 
 Mark is simply ethical, Matthew largely eschatological. But even such a 
 parable as that of the tares (Matt. xiii. 24-30, 37-43, which looks like an 
 eschatological recension of Mark iv 26-29) finds a parallel in Enoch xlv.-liv. 
 Jesus appears to have spoken freely to the people on the highest things, and 
 his parables are said (Mark xii. 12) to have been intelligible to the Pharisees.
 
 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 349 
 
 disciples. Considering the importance which was afterward 
 attached to this ceremony as the rite introductory to mem- 
 bership in a church (the fact embodied in the baptismal 
 commission, Matt, xxviii. 19), it is strange that it should be 
 entirely ignored by the Synoptics if Jesus had really thought 
 of establishing a new ecclesiastical organization, initiation 
 into which was announced by the ceremony of baptism. We 
 have to conclude that he looked to a reformation within 
 the body of Judaism, whence other nations were to be ulti- 
 mately won over. He had faith, it would seem, in the pos- 
 sibilities of the Jewish nation. It would be hard to surmise 
 what the result would have been if his disciples had con- 
 tinued his work in his spirit. Such was not to be the case. 
 The increasing prominence given to the spiritual and non- 
 nomistic elements of his teaching, and the conversion of 
 Gentiles who had no sympathy with the Jewish national 
 feeling, forced his disciples to assume an independent posi- 
 tion. If they had remained simply members of the Jewish 
 nation, they might have done much in the way of moral- 
 spiritual reform ; but it is, to say the least, very doubtful 
 whether Judaism could ever have been fashioned into an 
 instrument for reconstructing the world. National particu- 
 larism was too deeply ingrained in the Jewish life to permit 
 the emergence of a purely religious principle of universal 
 character. It was necessary that the spiritual should be vio- 
 lently severed from the national-ceremonial ; and this was 
 effected, not by Jesus himself, but by the course of events 
 after his death. He announced the spirit and the ethical 
 content of a new world-religion ; it was left to later needs, 
 embodied chiefly in the person of Paul, to isolate this spirit 
 and this content from local-national life, and so to fix it in 
 a theological framework and an ecclesiastical organization 
 that it might commend itself to all the world. But whether 
 Jesus contemplated a Church is a question of secondary in-
 
 350 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 
 
 terest ; the main thing is that he laid hold of the highest 
 ethical-spiritual thought, extricated it from disturbing for- 
 malities, and clothed it with a powerful spirit of conse- 
 cration to God and to humanity. Out of this the Church 
 naturally sprang. 
 
 If, then, Jesus did not contemplate a political kingdom, 
 and did not attempt to form an ecclesiastical organization, 
 what was his conception of the final outcome of his move- 
 ment ? And first, what was his conception of his own posi- 
 tion ? Did he regard himself as the promised Messiah ? and 
 if so, what was the function which he assigned himself ? 
 That the people and the disciples looked on him as the 
 Messiah may be inferred from a number of incidents given 
 in the Mark-Gospel (Bartimseus, the public entry, the trial, 
 x. xi. xiv.), and from the testimony of the two men in 
 Luke xxiv. He made no protest against this assumption, 
 and is said (Mark xiv. 62) to have answered with a decided 
 affirmative when officially asked by the high-priest if he 
 laid claim to such a character. According to the Synoptics 
 (Mark viii. 29 ; Matt. xvi. 17 ; Luke ix. 20), he did at a cer- 
 tain point in his career definitely announce himself to his 
 disciples as the Christ. He first asked them as to the cur- 
 rent opinions about him. They replied that some held him 
 to be John the Baptist, some Elijah, and others Jeremiah 
 or one of the prophets : whence we may infer that his per- 
 son and work had produced a great impression on the pop- 
 ular imagination, so that he was taken to be some important 
 personage, but not the Messiah. His bearing did not cor- 
 respond to the popular conception of the great deliverer. 
 When he turned to the disciples and asked whom they took 
 him to be, Peter, apparently acting as spokesman for all, 
 answered that he was the Christ. Jesus accepted the an- 
 swer, charged them that they should tell no one, and pro- 
 ceeded to open their eyes to the fate which awaited him.
 
 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 351 
 
 He was to be rejected, he said, by the leaders of the people, 
 and finally to be put to death. Such a communication was 
 naturally surprising to these men, and Peter began a violent 
 protest against such a Messianic scheme ; but his outbreak 
 was sternly repressed by Jesus, who pointed out that Peter 
 spoke from an earthly point of view, and from ignorance of 
 the true nature and demands of the new dispensation. 
 
 There seems to be no reason why we should not accept 
 this narrative as giving substantially Jesus' final view of his 
 own career. Whether or not this particular incident hap- 
 pened just as it is reported, it doubtless presents the gist 
 of what the Master said at various times. From it we may 
 conclude that there was a definite moment when he was 
 formally recognized by his disciples and by himself as the 
 promised Messiah, and when at the same time he felt that 
 his construction of the Messianic mission was very differ- 
 ent from that which prevailed among the Jewish people of 
 all classes. We should also naturally infer that previous 
 to the announcement at Csesarea Philippi nothing had been 
 said of a Messianic claim on his part. Either he had made 
 no such claim even in his own mind, or, holding himself 
 to be the Messiah, had remained silent till the disciples 
 should be able through his instructions to receive the sur- 
 prising and revolutionary announcement which he had to 
 make. The former supposition seems the more probable. 
 He is represented as always speaking very freely to his dis- 
 ciples ; and it does not appear why he should have kept 
 back the statement of his claim. It could not have been 
 in order to wait till they were ready, for when he at last 
 spoke they were utterly unprepared for the idea of the Mes- 
 sianic work which he announced. Further, in the accounts 
 of his ministry preceding the incident at Cassarea Philippi, 
 he is represented as a teacher and healer ; and there is no 
 indication that he thought of himself otherwise than as a
 
 352 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 
 
 moral-religious reformer. The probability is. then, that he 
 came gradually to think of himself as the deliverer prom- 
 ised by the prophets. His meditation on the promises of 
 the Old Testament and on the existing moral-religious lacks 
 of the nation, combined with his consciousness of spiritual 
 insight, with the conviction that he had laid hold of the 
 great life-giving principles of religion, might lead him to 
 believe that God had chosen him to initiate the new era 
 of spiritual purity and salvation. His reflection would also 
 lead him to see that the role of the deliverer could not be 
 one of physical force ; and above all, the portraiture of the 
 servant of Yahwe in Isa. liii., where the path to triumph 
 leads through suffering and death, might have forced on 
 him the conviction that such was to be the nature of his 
 career. After a while, indeed, his own surroundings would 
 suggest something of this sort. The hostility of the re- 
 ligious leaders of the people became constantly more pro- 
 nounced and more bitter, and he knew that if he remained 
 faithful to his convictions he should antagonize the repre- 
 sentatives of Mosaic orthodoxy more and more. He would 
 come to feel that there was a profound and irreconcilable 
 antagonism between his spirit and the spirit of the times. 
 Such a feeling he more than once expressed (Mark viii. 31; 
 ix. 12 ; x. 45). 
 
 It is doubtful in what light he looked on his own death, 
 what significance he attached to it. The fifty-third chap- 
 ter of Isaiah represents the death of the servant of Yahwe 
 as vicarious and expiatory in the general sense that God 
 accepts the life of his pure and perfect servant in lieu of 
 the punishment which would naturally fall on his erring 
 people. Such may have been the view of Jesus ; such is 
 the general meaning of his declaration (Mark x. 45) that 
 he came to give his life a ransom for many. He had a 
 lofty consciousness of power ; he may have felt that the
 
 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 353 
 
 sacrifice of his life was an essential step toward the estab- 
 lishment of his doctrine. But it would be only in a gen- 
 eral sense that he would regard his death as expiatory, 
 the sense in which suffering in general is looked on in the 
 Old Testament as an atonement (as in Tsa. xl. 2) ; and from 
 the meagreness of the data, we must remain in doubt as to 
 the precise nature of this feeling. The saying quoted above 
 is the only one given in the Gospel of Mark in which he 
 refers to this point. In the connection he is speaking only 
 of service as the mark of greatness for his disciples ; and 
 he adds, in order to set them an example, that he himself 
 came not to be ministered to, but to minister. The con- 
 cluding clause, "and to give his life a ransom for many," 
 is not quite in the line of the preceding remarks. It may 
 have been uttered by him as the expression of the cul- 
 mination of his ministry, or it may have been added at a 
 later time, when the belief in the expiatory character of 
 his death had become fixed. No such view is hinted at 
 in the Sermon on the Mount. If Jesus really held it, it 
 did not belong to his earlier teaching, but was reached by 
 his later reflection called forth by the continually thicken- 
 ing dangers that surrounded him, and his prevision of his 
 tragic end. 
 
 Another conception of his mission is perhaps given by 
 the title "Son of Man," by which he preferred to desig- 
 nate himself. This expression occurs first in the book of 
 Ezekiel. It is the prophet's standing name for himself. 
 The Hebrew term means simply " human being ; " and the 
 prophet's purpose seems to have been to express his con- 
 viction of his own littleness and weakness in the presence 
 of the Almighty God. He at the same time thus sets forth 
 the feebleness of humanity in general ; but his primary feel- 
 ing apparently was that he himself, called by God to an- 
 nounce his will, was in himself only dust and nothingness 
 
 23
 
 354 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 
 
 and entitled to recognition only as the messenger and mouth- 
 piece of the Most High. In Dan. vii 13 the "Son of Man" 
 means (as in Ezekiel) merely humanity, and represents the 
 nation Israel, conceived of as the prophet or human in- 
 terpreter and representative of God, the favored bearer of 
 the divine truth, and inheritor of the divine blessing. The 
 nation, or rather the faithful part of it, is thought of as 
 morally and religiously pure ; but the ethical side of the 
 picture is obscured by the eschatological. In the Enoch- 
 Parables it is a title of the Messiah, doubtless derived from 
 Ezekiel and Daniel, especially from the latter, of whose 
 text (Dan. vii.) the description in Enoch xlv. xlviii. is an 
 interpretation. The Aramaic dialect, which was probably 
 the language of Jesus and his disciples, employs the same 
 expression for " human being." Jesus may have used it in 
 the moral sense which Ezekiel attaches to it, to repre- 
 sent himself as the envoy and spokesman of God, by whose 
 authority he acted, without whose aid he was nothing. It 
 would thus be the expression of the feeling both of weak- 
 ness and of power : of weakness, inasmuch as humanity in 
 itself is weak ; of power, inasmuch as humanity inspired 
 by God is strong. Though primarily the synonym of human 
 impotency, it embodies also the profound sense of oneness 
 with God and the appropriation of the divine potency. It is 
 possible, however, that it had become at this time (through 
 Daniel and Enoch) a specific and technical title for the Mes- 
 siah, 1 and that Jesus so uses it of himself. In that case, that 
 it is put into his mouth (Mark ii. 10, 28) before his declara- 
 tion of his Messiahship to his disciples (Mark viii. 27-30) 
 may be explained by the fact that it later became a familiar 
 name for him, and might be proleptically ascribed to him 
 
 1 If so, it would have a peculiar significance in such utterances as Mark ii. 
 10, 28, viii. 31, which might then be regarded as defining the Messianic func- 
 tion in general.
 
 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 355 
 
 even at the beginning. The content of the term, as employed 
 by him, must of course be defined, not simply or chiefly by 
 the preceding or current usage, but by his own words. 
 
 Thus far we have noticed only the moral-spiritual ele- 
 ments of Jesus' consciousness and of his construction of 
 the kingdom of God. That kingdom he conceived to be pri- 
 marily the sincere righteousness of the soul based on and 
 identical with loving trust in God and imitation of him. 
 His mission on earth he believed to be the announcement 
 and exemplification of the new moral-spiritual order of 
 things. The forces to which he appealed were ethical and 
 religious ; the consummation to which he looked was moral 
 perfection. What, then, was his conception of the historical 
 unfolding and completion of the new dispensation, or in 
 other words, his idea of the destiny of the world ? Did 
 he think merely of a gradual development of society under 
 the control of moral-religious forces, or was there in his 
 view an historical culmination which was to set a limit 
 to the world's moral history ? And if there were such a 
 culmination, did he think of it as far off or near, and what 
 position therein did he assign himself? If we are to follow 
 the Synoptics, we shall have to believe that he looked for a 
 speedy judgment, whereby he himself, invested with super- 
 natural power, should usher in the completed and ever- 
 lasting kingdom of God. According to this view, there were 
 two stages of this kingdom, the one belonging to the pres- 
 ent, the other to the future. These are elsewhere in the 
 New Testament designated as "this or the present age or 
 world," and " the age or world to come." The work of the 
 present age would then be considered as merely preparatory, 
 the period of the growing crop ; the future judgment was 
 the reaping, when the wheat should be separated from the 
 tares, and perpetual stability guaranteed to the society of 
 the elect servants of God. This conception existed in the
 
 356 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 
 
 time of Jesus, for it is found in Enoch and the Sibyl, and 
 more fully in the New Testament Apocalypse. It is given 
 substantially in the Second Gospel : " Whoever shall be 
 ashamed of me and of my words in this adulterous and 
 sinful generation, the Son of Man also shall be ashamed 
 of him when he comes in the glory of his Father with the 
 holy angels. . . . There are some here of those that stand 
 by who shall in no wise taste of death till they see the 
 kingdom of God come with power " (Mark viii. 38 ; ix. 1). 
 The necessary inference from this passage would be that 
 Jesus expected to come in person, attended by angels, to es- 
 tablish the new dispensation of things in final form. The 
 same conclusion would follow from the parable of judgment 
 (Matt. xxv. 31-46), where a separation is made between the 
 righteous and the wicked of all nations, the former being 
 sent away into eternal life, the latter into eternal punish- 
 ment. The ground of distinction between the two classes is 
 devotion to the person of the judge, only this devotion is 
 shown by care for his people in this world. The historical 
 consummation is definite and permanent ; the fate of men 
 is decided at once and forever. The present kingdom of 
 God passes into the everlasting world of the future, and 
 good and bad moral qualities, with their retributions, are 
 permanently fixed without possibility of change. 
 
 It is difficult to decide whether Jesus taught this doc- 
 trine in whole or in part. Though it certainly does not be- 
 long to the same stratum of thought as the ethical teaching 
 of the Sermon on the Mount and similar passages, it does 
 not necessarily exclude such ideas. 1 The conception of a 
 final judicial determination of the fate of men has been held 
 from the days of the old prophets till now, in conjunction 
 with the recognition of individual moral development and 
 responsibility. The belief in a divine judgment which was 
 
 1 A judgment is suggested in Matt. vii. 22, 23.
 
 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 357 
 
 to close the existing order of things and introduce the era 
 of Israel's blessedness was well established in the first cen- 
 tury of our era. It is found in Daniel, Enoch, the Sibyl, 
 Second Maccabees, and the Psalter of Solomon. In some 
 of these writings, as we have seen, it is God, in others it 
 is the Messiah, that is to be the judge. 1 There was nothing 
 in the intellectual conditions or the beliefs of the time to 
 make such a conception of himself impossible or difficult 
 for a great ethical teacher. It might be supposed that such 
 an one would then have to think of himself as more than 
 human ; but this was neither necessary nor probable. He 
 might be chosen and his name called by God before the 
 world was created ; so say the Enoch-Parables (xlviii. 3, 6) 
 and the Talmud (Ber. Rab. 1). Such an idea was suggested 
 by such passages as Mic. v. 2 (1), Isa. ix. 6 (5), Ps. Ixxii. 17. 
 He might be appointed to corne in power and glory to judge 
 the world (so Enoch and the Talmud). But God, it was 
 held, could endow a prophet with such powers and func- 
 tions ; and Jewish monotheistic thought seems always to 
 have conceived of the Messiah both as completely subor- 
 dinate to the Supreme Being and as an Israelite in origin 
 and nature. It is thus in itself neither impossible nor im- 
 probable that such a statement as that of Mark viii. 38 
 (that the Son of Man should come in the glory of his Father 
 with the holy angels) should represent the real idea of Jesus. 
 Even the declaration of the next verse (Mark ix. 1), that 
 this glorious coming should take place in that generation, 
 cannot be said to be impossible for him, however much we 
 may feel disposed to reject it as out of accord with his moral 
 
 1 God himself is judge in Mai. iv. (Heb. in. 19-24), Joel iii. (Heb. iv.), 
 Ps. xcvi. xcviii., Dan. vii , Enoch xc., Sibyl iii. 669 ff., 56, Psalms of Solo- 
 mon, passim, 2 Mac. vi. vii. ; the Messiah in the Enoch-parables xlv. li. 
 Ixix. The latter view seems thus to have come into existence shortly before 
 the beginning of our era. The Talmud also appears in some passages to 
 regard God, in others the Messiah, as the judge. Weber, " System," 88.
 
 358 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 
 
 elevation ; his ethical purity and greatness are independent 
 of all such local opinions. The subsequent history of his 
 disciples does not prevent our attributing such views to him. 
 The account in Luke xxiv. describes their expectations only 
 in the most general terms. They hoped that it was he that 
 should redeem Israel. Their conduct after his death shows 
 that they were at first grievously disappointed by that event, 
 and the belief that he would speedily appear as judge seems 
 to have been general in the first century (1 Thess. iv. 15-17 ; 
 1 Cor. xv. 51, 52 ; Jas. v. 8 ; 1 Pet. iv. 7). How, it may be 
 asked, can we account for these statements of the Gospels 
 and Epistles except on the supposition that they rest on a 
 true tradition of his sayings ? It may be supposed that 
 such utterances belong to the latter part of his career. Be- 
 ginning, like John, simply as a moral-religious reformer and 
 proclaimer of the coming kingdom of God, he may, as his 
 conviction of his Messianic character became stronger, have 
 appropriated the current ideas of a Messianic judicial parou- 
 sia. In the Gospels the discourses delivered after the an- 
 nouncement at Csesarea Philippi have a decidedly distincter 
 eschatological tone than those which precede. 
 
 On the other hand, this pronounced tone may be satisfac- 
 torily accounted for by the supposition that utterances of the 
 Master of a general character were afterward interpreted, ex- 
 panded, and colored in the light of subsequent events. The 
 date at which our present Synoptic Gospels were put into 
 shape (after the destruction of Jerusalem) was late enough 
 to allow a considerable growth of legendary material. The 
 person of Jesus was gradually idealized. At first prophet 
 and Jewish Messiah (Mark viii. ; Luke xxiv.), he became 
 the Lord (Jas.), set forth by his resurrection as Son of God 
 (Kom. i.), soon to come as judge (2 Cor. v. 10), destined to 
 reign in heaven till all his enemies should be subdued, then 
 to deliver up his delegated authority to God (1 Cor. xv. 24-
 
 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 3G9 
 
 28). If such a conception of Jesus had become general in 
 the Church by the year 70, it would be natural that it 
 should appear in the Gospels. The pictures of his royal 
 and judicial functions in Epistles and Gospels belong to 
 the same circle of ideas. They differ in certain details, but 
 not more than we should expect from the diversities of dif- 
 ferent sections of the Church. In one point they all agree, 
 that the coming of the Lord would not be delayed. The 
 details of his coming might have been supplied from cur- 
 rent Jewish ideas. There may have been a basis in his 
 words for the later accounts. He may have spoken of a 
 coming age of blessedness, which he as Messiah should in- 
 troduce, and of a judgment to be held by God. Out of such 
 material, the general sense of which would remain distinct 
 in the memory of the disciples, the later tradition might 
 then have built up the discourses in the form in which we 
 now have them. 
 
 To many persons it may seem that the atmosphere of the 
 discourses in question is rather that of the Epistles than that 
 of the life of the Master in the simplest form in which the 
 Synoptics give it. If we follow him along the line of his 
 ethical-religious teaching from the beginning till his death, 
 we have a picture of lofty moral simplicity and devotion 
 which may appear to be marred by the introduction of these 
 details of judgment. The moral-spiritual orderliness and pro- 
 found sobriety of his ideas would, it might be supposed, put 
 him out of sympathy with the mechanical side of the cur- 
 rent conceptions respecting the kingdom of righteousness. 
 It has already been pointed out that such considerations can- 
 not be decisive from either the historical or the psychological 
 point of view. These mechanical conceptions were held by 
 his contemporaries, and afterward by his disciples, and may 
 have been held by him. It does not seem possible to de- 
 termine from our data whether he held them or not. The
 
 360 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 
 
 acceptance of such ideas carried along with it the suppo- 
 sition of something supernatural, not necessarily in the per- 
 son of the Messiah, but certainly in his history. This also 
 was in consonance with the beliefs of the age, and need not 
 have been repugnant to him. In fine, the opinions of that 
 time concerning the historical setting of the moral-spiritual 
 kingdom of God must be put into the same category with 
 the opinions respecting the material of what we call the sci- 
 ences. Their relation to moral clearness and purity was of 
 the same sort as that of the current ideas of geography, 
 astronomy, and biblical exegesis. The power of the founder 
 of Christianity was in his moral personality and his con- 
 ception of a thoroughly spiritual society, just as the power 
 of the prophets lay in the religious purity of their ideas, 
 in spite of their vain hopes of political sovereignty. The 
 local setting of the ideas respecting the perfect society has 
 changed from age to age ; the moral essence remains. The 
 Church of to-day has given up the special historical hope 
 of the Church of the first century. The moral spiritual 
 teaching of Jesus, resting on his past and reflecting the 
 best thought of his contemporaries, has maintained itself 
 to the present day without having found its realization in 
 social life. 
 
 A word may be said about the eschatological discourses 
 in the Synoptics (Matt. xxiv. ; Mark xiii. ; Luke xxi.), which 
 seem to give a date for the final consummation. That they 
 were not delivered by Jesus in the form in which we now 
 have them may probably be inferred from the consideration 
 already mentioned, that the disciples for some time after 
 his death show no knowledge of their contents. The occa- 
 sion of the main discourse is the remark of Jesus that the 
 temple should be so destroyed that not one stone should 
 be left on another. His disciples ask when that should be. 
 Jesus replies by giving the premonitory signs of the catas-
 
 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 361 
 
 trophe : there were to be false Christs, wars and rumors 
 of wars, earthquakes and famines ; his followers were to be 
 persecuted, and his gospel was to be preached to all the 
 nations. The sign of the end is the desecration of the tem- 
 ple ; after which the heavenly bodies should be darkened, 
 and then the Son of Man would come in clouds. The allu- 
 sion to the destruction of Jerusalem by the Eomans is evi- 
 dent ; and this brief apocalyptic discourse seems to have been 
 written at a time when it was supposed that the coming of 
 the Lord would not be greatly delayed after the fall of the 
 holy city. It belongs also, we may infer, to the period when 
 the principle that the gospel was to be preached to the Gen- 
 tiles had been widely accepted, a conception foreign to the 
 thought of the first disciples. It is also to be noted that 
 the redaction of the discourse in Matthew shows certain dif- 
 ferences from the accounts in Mark and Luke ; and though 
 these are not very important, they suggest the work of dif- 
 ferent hands. 1 It is possible that Jesus said something about 
 the future, some brief word out of which these discourses 
 were expanded. This supposition is, indeed, not necessary to 
 account for their existence. It was a time of apocalypses. 
 Nothing would be more natural than that some disciple 
 should set forth his idea of the end, and should put it into 
 the mouth of the Master, just as similar predictions had 
 been assigned to Daniel, Enoch, and Moses. It was not lack 
 of reverence for these men that led writers of that period 
 
 1 Verse 20, the " Sabbath " indicates an observance of the Jewish cere- 
 monial law ; verses 26-28 are minutely descriptive of the manner of the 
 Messiah's appearance (and at the same time give hints of current opinions 
 as to the place at which he would show himself) ; verse 30, "All the tribes 
 of the earth shall mourn " recalls various Old Testament passages, such as 
 Amos viii. 8 ; ix. 5 ; Hos. iv. 3 ; Jer. iv. 28 ; and cf. Sibyl iii. 558, "All souls 
 of men shall deeply sigh." The details of verses 37-51 differ considerably 
 from the corresponding passages in Luke and Mark. The recension of Luke 
 also has its peculiarities : in general it is marked by more literary finish and 
 less regard for details.
 
 362 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 
 
 to make them mouthpieces of their own reflections. On the 
 contrary, the desire was to gain the authority attaching to 
 their names. We have, in all probability, in these Synop- 
 tical pieces, opinions of a later generation. It must be left 
 undecided whether and how far the discourses are built up 
 on real words of Jesus. He may or may not have said some- 
 thing looking to a temporal definition of his coming. 1 In any 
 case, the present form of the discourses seems to be late. 
 
 Little need be said of the succeeding history, during the 
 first century, of the Christian conception of the kingdom of 
 God. It was soon practically absorbed in the general ad- 
 vance of Christian life, and ceased to have definite influence. 
 After the death of Jesus, his speedy coming was looked for- 
 ward to as the relief from present suffering and the in- 
 troduction to perfect blessedness (James v. 7, 8). A more 
 developed view of the parousia is given in the Second Epis- 
 tle to the Thessalonians (i. 6-10), a picture which agrees 
 almost exactly with that of the Synoptics : the Lord Jesus 
 is to be revealed from heaven in flaming fire, rendering ven- 
 geance to unbelievers and rest to the saints. Substantially 
 the same conception is found in First Corinthians (xv. 23- 
 28, 51-55). The succeeding Epistles of Paul have less defi- 
 nite references to the coming of Christ, nor is it elsewhere 
 prominent in the New Testament except in Second Peter and 
 Eevelation. Everywhere it is looked forward to as deliv- 
 erance from the present distress, and is used as the occasion 
 of ethical exhortation. The coming of the Lord, it was be- 
 lieved, would end the existing dispensation, and introduce 
 the reign of the saints. But meantime life went on, and 
 
 1 The statement (given in Mark and Matthew, but not in Luke) that the 
 day of the coming was known neither to angels nor to Messiah, but only to 
 God, is difficult, since the rest of the discourse shows accurate knowledge 
 of the time. Such a statement is more suitable for one who, looking con- 
 fidently for an impending event, is uncertain of the precise day, than for one 
 who is making a definite prediction a considerable time beforehand.
 
 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 363 
 
 the expectation of this speedy change in no wise led to a 
 relaxation of moral rules, but rather incited men so to live 
 that the Lord at his coming might find them faithful 
 and worthy to be members of his righteous kingdom. The 
 coming of the kingdom was something to be hoped for 
 and prayed for. Every day the petition was to be put up, 
 " Thy kingdom come ; " and this was synonymous with the 
 other petition, " Thy will be done." Few details are given 
 in the New Testament. The old Israelitish conception of 
 the temporal kingdom of Israel passed gradually away ; 
 it was swallowed up in the larger idea of the redeemed 
 people of the kingdom of God of all nations ushered into 
 a spiritual blessedness which was not bounded by space 
 or time. 
 
 There were attempts in the first century to define with 
 precision the time of the second coming of Christ. We 
 have already seen that the great apocalyptic discourse in 
 the Synoptics looks to the destruction of Jerusalem by the 
 Eomans as the turning-point in the history of the world. 
 This discourse must have been composed or finally redacted 
 about the time of the fall of the holy city. Important 
 events of this sort have in all ages excited the imagina- 
 tion of pious men and led to theories of the final consum- 
 mation of things. Another great fact which before this 
 had seemed to many to give the clew to the mystery was 
 the Roman Empire. At first indifferent, the Roman gov- 
 ernment had come to be a persecutor. The frightful bar- 
 barities of Nero had lifted him to the bad eminence of an 
 anti-Christ. The Jews had a similar feeling. In the Tal- 
 mud, Edom, the bitterest and most hated enemy of the old 
 Israel, stands for Rome (Weber, " System," 81). In the 
 New Testament Apocalypse, the Empire is represented by 
 Babylon, whose haughtiness, cruelty, and appalling destruc- 
 tion are celebrated in glowing words in the Old Testament.
 
 364 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 
 
 The destruction of Rome is the point to which the author 
 looks forward as the immediate introduction to the estab- 
 lishment of the kingdom ; the latter event follows imme- 
 diately on the former (Rev. xviii. xix.). The destruction 
 of the city is preceded by the appearance of a beast (xiii.), 
 who blasphemes God, makes war on the saints, and is wor- 
 shipped by all that dwell on the earth except those whose 
 names are written in the book of life. This beast is after- 
 ward explained (xvii.) to be a Roman emperor, the eighth in 
 the line, yet of the seven first. The reference is most prob- 
 ably to Nero, the fifth of the series, counting Augustus as 
 the first ; and the representation proceeds on the supposition 
 that Nero, though dead, will live again. There is reason to 
 believe that the reappearance of the dead emperor was ex- 
 pected. 1 Apparently, therefore, the scheme of the author of 
 this portion of the book of Revelation is that the Emperor 
 Nero was to return to power, exalt himself as an object 
 of worship, and inflict great suffering on the saints; and 
 then the great city was to be destroyed and the kingdom 
 of Christ established (xix ). Such seems also to be the con- 
 ception of the enigmatical passage in Second Thessalonians 
 (ii.), in which the coming of the Lord Jesus Christ arid the 
 gathering of his people are spoken of. The Lord's coming 
 is to be preceded by an apostasy and the revelation of the 
 man of lawlessness or sin, a mysterious person who exalts 
 himself against all that is called God or is an object of 
 worship, and by his signs and lying wonders deceives those 
 who love not the truth. The portraiture here corresponds 
 so exactly to that in the Apocalypse that we may with prob- 
 ability suppose the man of lawlessness to be the Emperor 
 Nero. But there is something that restrains his appearance 
 
 1 For the evidence see Renan, " L'Antechrist." The number <>G6 assigned 
 to the beast (Rev. xiii. 18) has been variously explained, usually from some 
 name or epithet of Nero, sometimes as symbolical. See the commentaries.
 
 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 365 
 
 that must be removed before the son of perdition can be 
 manifested. What this restraining thing was we do not 
 know. The author of the Epistle speaks in a mysterious 
 undertone. He had told it to the brethren when he was 
 with them, and they, he says, are acquainted with it. It 
 is of no great importance for our purpose to determine what 
 this restraining thing or person was; the main point is 
 that the consummation is connected with the fortunes of 
 the Eoman Empire, and that it is to be expected speedily. 
 The Lord Jesus is to slay the lawless one with the breath 
 of his mouth. It is the opposition of Christ and anti-Christ, 
 germs of which are found in the Old Testament. It was a 
 natural feeling that the evil must go on increasing in in- 
 tensity, and that then, when it reached its highest point and 
 seemed intolerable, the interposition and deliverance should 
 come. 1 How far this particular view, which connected the 
 parousia with the fall of the Koman Empire, was held in 
 the early Church, it is hardly possible to say. After the 
 destruction of Jerusalem, when Nero did not appear, and 
 the Empire showed only increasing strength and prosperity, 
 other points of view had to be sought. The Church did not 
 cease to cherish the hope of the Lord's coming, but it was 
 less anxious to fix a definite date, 2 and rather devoted itself 
 to the cultivation of social virtues and the perfecting of its 
 organization. It gradually accepted its mission to dwell in 
 the world as a life-giving influence. As its membership in- 
 creased, its energies were absorbed in the care of the numer- 
 ous interests which it had gathered about itself. It was the 
 old temporal kingdom of Israel, with an invisible king and 
 a body of citizens who belonged to all the nations of the 
 
 1 So in Ezekiel, Daniel, and Enoch. The Antiochus of Daniel may have 
 suggested the Nero of the New Testament Apocalypse. 
 
 2 So much we may infer from the literature of the first century. Since 
 that time there have always been chiliastic or millenarian tendencies (nota- 
 bly A. D. 1000) but they have not been controlling points of view.
 
 366 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 
 
 earth. Its conquests were of souls, and its aim was the sal- 
 vation of the world. 
 
 The change in the principle of membership was the most 
 important characteristic of the outward organization of the 
 Church. It was the sign of the advance from a national 
 to a universal form of religion. As we have already seen, 
 it is hard to say how far Jesus himself contemplated such 
 a broadening of membership in the earthly kingdom of God. 
 If we are to judge from the procedure of the disciples for 
 twenty years after his death, his attention was fixed mainly, 
 if not exclusively, on his own people. To the parent church 
 in Jerusalem it seemed a self-evident and fundamental prin- 
 ciple that entrance into the Christian community was pos- 
 sible only through Judaism. We read indeed (Acts x.) of 
 a special vision and revelation by which Peter was taught 
 that no man was to be called common or unclean, and in 
 consequence of which certain Gentiles to whom he preached 
 and who received the Holy Ghost were baptized and recog- 
 nized as Christians without having been circumcised. But 
 it is impossible to reconcile this account with subsequent 
 proceedings. The long fight which preceded the admission 
 of the right of Gentiles, as such, to membership in the 
 Church is unintelligible if Peter received so open and de- 
 cisive a declaration from heaven, and Paul knew of no mis- 
 sion of Peter to the Gentiles (Gal. ii. 7-9). We must regard 
 this narrative as the elaboration of a later tradition, which, 
 after Gentile membership had been fairly established, sought 
 to gain for it the authority of the name of the greatest 
 of the strictly Jewish apostles. The ground of the radical 
 change in the constitution of the Church is to be sought 
 in the circumstances of the times. A violent persecution 
 drove a number of the disciples out of Palestine into the 
 neighboring countries of Phoenicia, Cyprus, and Syria. Here 
 they preached the new faith, but at first to Jews only. At
 
 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 367 
 
 Antioch, however, as it would seem, they were drawn into 
 addressing themselves to Greeks also, many of whom be- 
 lieved. How the question of admission into the Church was 
 at first solved in Antioch we are not informed ; but to this 
 city Paul was brought by Barnabas, labored there for a 
 year, and thence went out to proclaim the new faith in 
 Asia Minor. It was in another Antioch, in Pisidia, that 
 Paul and Barnabas took the decisive step of turning from 
 the Jews and addressing themselves directly to the Gen- 
 tiles ; and it was the entrance of a large body of Gentiles 
 into the Church which decided the question of the terms 
 of membership. Should these persons be forced to sub- 
 mit to the initiatory rite^of Judaism before they could be 
 esteemed worthy to be baptized into the faith of Jesus 
 Christ ? Paul faced the problem boldly, and with the prac- 
 tical judgment and fearless decision which so eminently 
 characterized him, determined that their faith in Jesus gave 
 them of itself full claim to the privileges of the Church. 
 This was the decisive step ; Christianity thus ceased to be 
 a Jewish sect, and became an independent religion which 
 offered itself to all men without distinction of nations. The 
 detailed history of this revolution has unfortunately not been 
 preserved. That there was a sharp conflict we know from 
 Paul's letters (Gal. ii. iv. ; 1 Cor. i.) and from hints in the 
 book of Acts (xv.). By the extreme conservatives, who in- 
 sisted on circumcision as a necessary preliminary to mem- 
 bership in the Christian Church, Paul seems to have been 
 looked on as a traitor to the national faith He persisted, 
 however, in his more liberal policy, and has himself de- 
 scribed (Gal. ii.) how he went up to Jerusalem with Bar- 
 nabas and Titus, met the chief men of the mother-church, 
 and there in spite of opposition obtained the indorsement 
 of the great apostles, James, Peter, and John, and the recog- 
 nition of the right of Gentiles to enter the Church without
 
 368 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 
 
 first becoming Jews. And Paul was not content with this 
 admission ; he employed his sharp dialectic to show that 
 the insistence on circumcision for the Gentiles was incom- 
 patible with true faith in Christ, was a practical denial of 
 the completeness of Christ's redemption and of the suffi- 
 ciency of the grace of God, was, in a word, the aban- 
 donment of the spiritual religion of divine grace, and the 
 advocacy of the dead and deadly idea of salvation by 
 works. Thus he elevated universality of membership to the 
 rank of a fundamental principle of spiritual religion. 
 
 It has already been remarked that Paul gave to the 
 new faith that framework of religious dogma which was 
 essential to its continued existence and efficiency. He con- 
 nected salvation definitely with the glorified person of Jesus 
 as the Messiah. In detaching it from Judaism and se- 
 curing it independent organization, he provided the other 
 essential for a world-religion. It is in this sense that 
 Paul may be called the founder of Christianity as the 
 organized embodiment of the ideal kingdom of God. In 
 the higher sense that title belongs only to Jesus. Jesus 
 laid the foundations of a practically universal religious 
 community ; Paul narrowed the conception in a dogmatic 
 way. Jesus announced certain fundamental principles which 
 must always and everywhere determine the attitude of the 
 soul toward a personal God ; Paul attached these princi- 
 ples to a mass of dogma which essayed to define and ex- 
 plain them theologically. From the whole body of religious 
 thought which the Jewish people had worked out in the 
 long course of its religious experience Jesus selected that 
 part which was independent of national relations. He said 
 little or nothing of the Jewish code. He accepted it as a 
 fact, not undertaking to abrogate or even modify it, but 
 casting into its midst a body of spiritual-religious truth 
 which was independent of all codes, and which, if accepted
 
 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 369 
 
 and acted on, would annul the evil of a formal code. Thus, 
 in one sense, as has already been pointed out, his scheme 
 of life was nomistic, in so far as it accepted the Mosaic law 
 as the rule of faith and practice. But on the other hand, 
 the exclusive prominence which he gave to spiritual doc- 
 trine might be relied on, if it were sincerely accepted, to 
 establish a new method of moral-religious life. The diffi- 
 culty was that men would be slow to accept it. So much 
 are men creatures of routine, so much under the domination 
 of mechanical rule, that it is always to be feared that the 
 outward will coerce and repress the inward. Spiritual truth 
 is dimmed and enfeebled by the presence of a great mass of 
 prescriptions. There is indeed no perfect escape from this 
 danger. Whatever the purity and force of the spiritual truth 
 which is committed to men, they will always do what they 
 can to enclose it in a framework of unspiritual dogma, and 
 in the conflict between the spiritual and the unspiritual 
 human weakness always gives the advantage to the latter. 
 The history of Christianity abounds in illustrations of this 
 tendency. The Church has at various times built up a 
 structure of beliefs and practices which for intricacy and 
 crushing power may fairly be compared with the tradi- 
 tional law of the Jews. Even in the first century, within 
 two generations after the death of the Master, the Church 
 had grown into a partially petrified organization. We 
 are not to regard the transition from Judaism to histori- 
 cal Christianity as the substitution of a perfect for an 
 imperfect form of religion, but as an advance from an im- 
 perfect to a less imperfect form, to one which permitted 
 that moral -spiritual truth which is the germ of all reli- 
 gions to assert itself with greater freedom and exert its 
 true influence more completely. For the Jewish scheme of 
 obedience to a mass of precepts Paul substituted faith in 
 Jesus as Redeemer, a vastly higher and freer conception ; 
 
 24
 
 370 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 
 
 yet even this, especially in its concomitants, speedily became 
 mechanicalized. 
 
 Christianity was a Jewish development ; but it was much 
 more. The conception of the earthly kingdom of God, as a 
 human organization, was, as we have seen, almost peculiar 
 to the Jews. Elsewhere it is found only in germinal form ; 
 but its essential elements are universal. It means the due 
 recognition of all the factors and relations of life, human 
 and divine, the highest refinement of ethical and religious 
 feeling and action. It must include the best thought of the 
 world, and can come truly into existence only by the co- 
 operation of all peoples and races. It is not exclusively 
 Jewish or Greek or Roman, but more than all this. The 
 ultimate aim of the world's life is the fusion of its high- 
 est ideas into a harmonious practical unity ; and it is the 
 great merit of Christianity to have taken a decided step in 
 preparation for this end. In the first century already the 
 Church showed an intermingling of Semitic and Hellenic 
 conceptions, both ethical and religious. 1 In the divine there 
 was majesty, justice, and love ; in the human there was the 
 recognition of the supremacy of conscience and the power 
 of sympathy and sweetness. This was in itself a great ad- 
 vance ; it was the partial fusion of two great masses of 
 human thought. But this is not all. The service that Chris- 
 tianity did was so to strip religion of local and anthropo- 
 morphic elements that all the Western world might in a 
 substantial way unite in working out the truly religious 
 life. The Old-World deadly isolation was done away with 
 (Eph. ii. 11-22), not completely and absolutely, but so 
 substantially as to mark an epoch in human history. There 
 remained localisms and anthropomorphisms whose removal 
 was to be left to the slow-moving moral forces of society ; 
 
 1 The Semitism, moreover, had already been affected by Persian thought. 
 Whether the Hellenism had felt the influence of Hindu ideas is doubtful.
 
 THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 371 
 
 but the path was marked out, and the greatest obstacles 
 taken out of the way. Political unity had been achieved, 
 but complete harmony was impossible without religious one- 
 ness. Christianity offered what all could accept. By fur- 
 nishing a practical bond between nationalities it effected 
 what the Hellenic and Roman religions had proved them- 
 selves unable to effect. It was the fruit of a noble and 
 powerful eclecticism carried on by lofty spiritual thinkers. 
 It had its roots in the far past, but its special impulse came 
 from Jesus of Nazareth.
 
 CHAPTER VII. 
 
 ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 THE eschatological ideas of the New Testament offer 
 very little that can be considered an advance on the 
 current Jewish conceptions of the period. Such ideas by 
 their nature belong not to the spiritual kernel of religion, 
 but to its external dogmatic framework. From the point 
 of view of pure religion they are among the least influen- 
 tial and the least interesting of religious facts. They are 
 of importance, however, as showing how much of the ex- 
 isting dogma Christianity felt called on to accept in order 
 that it might become effective for that generation as well 
 as for many succeeding generations. We have to consider 
 the beliefs respecting immortality, resurrection, and the new 
 dispensation. The last of these is closely connected with 
 the doctrine of the Messiah, and has already been touched 
 on. Some points not before brought out may be here re- 
 ferred to. It is probably true of this whole circle of be- 
 liefs that only certain current phases of faith are mentioned 
 in the New Testament and in the immediately preceding 
 literature. It is hardly possible to give a complete history 
 of the eschatological ideas of the age, nor is this necessary 
 for our present purpose. They are interesting for us in so 
 far as they illustrate the moral-religious life of the time ; 
 that is, in the first place, as contributing an ethical factor, 
 and then as supplying what was regarded as a necessary 
 framework for religious life. It will be sufficient to refer 
 to certain prominent facts in the current belief. 1 
 
 1 In spite of a number of excellent works, German, French, and English, 
 a critical history of Jewish and Christian eschatology is still a desideratum.
 
 ESCHATOLOGY. 373 
 
 1. Let us first notice the fuller sketch of the fortunes 
 of the earthly kingdom of God which is given in the 
 Apocalypse. The main point of this sketch is the double 
 judgment. The destruction of the Eoman Empire is fol- 
 lowed by the imprisonment of Satan for a thousand years 
 and by the first judgment. Those who had been beheaded 
 for the testimony of Jesus and had not worshipped the 
 beast that is, had not acknowledged the religious au- 
 thority of the Empire are restored to life (the first res- 
 urrection), and reign with Christ a thousand years. At the 
 end of this millennium Satan is loosed from prison, and 
 advances at the head of the innumerable hosts of Gog and 
 Magog to attack the camp of the saints and the beloved 
 city. Fire descends from heaven and devours the anti- 
 godly army ; the devil is cast into the lake of fire along 
 with the beast and the false prophet (the political and re- 
 ligious enemies of the faith), and there they are to be tor- 
 mented for ever and ever. Thereupon follows the general 
 judgment, where every man is judged according to his 
 works, and whoever is not found written in the book of 
 life that is, is not a believer in Jesus is cast into 
 the lake of fire. Then the first heaven and the first earth 
 pass away, a new heaven and a new earth come, God makes 
 his dwelling with men, and from the eyes of his people all 
 tears are wiped away. There is a city, a new Jerusalem, 
 which shines with an everlasting divine light, and a life 
 radiant with everlasting divine blessedness. 
 
 It is evident that the body of this description is taken 
 from the books of Ezekiel, Isaiah, and Enoch. Ezekiel 
 (xxxviii. xxxix.) describes the great invasion of Gog, the 
 Prince of Magog (in the Apocalypse Gog becomes a nation), 
 which precedes the final blessed establishment of Israel in 
 its own land ; Isaiah portrays the blessedness of the new 
 heavens and the new earth which God will create for his
 
 374 ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 people, where weeping shall be no more heard, and God will 
 dwell with them forever (Ixv.) ; Enoch gives a picture of 
 the general judgment which is substantially the same as 
 that of the New Testament book (li. Ixii. Ixiii. xci.). How 
 the conception of two judgments arose it is less easy to say. 
 Perhaps the author of this passage of the Apocalypse, fol- 
 lowing Ezekiel, regarded the conflict with Magog as the 
 final struggle of the enemies of the people of God, 1 while 
 at the same time he was convinced that the fall of the 
 Roman Empire was in a decisive way to usher in the king- 
 dom of God. In order to reconcile these two views he may 
 then have conceived of an interval between the two events. 
 The first judgment was to introduce a real reign of the 
 saints, a period in which peace was secured by the im- 
 prisonment of the devil, 2 but during which earthly affairs in 
 general went on as before. Then comes the final judgment, 
 the destruction of death and Hades, 3 the final imprisonment 
 of Satan, the removal of all sinful elements from life, and 
 the establishment of a permanent existence of happiness for 
 the righteous. 
 
 Whether in this scheme and others of similar character 
 we are to see the coloring of Persian ideas, it is hardly pos- 
 sible to decide with certainty. The resemblances between 
 the Jewish and Persian eschatologies are striking, and the 
 general possibility, of Persian influence is proved by the 
 Jewish and Christian angelology and demonology ; but the 
 
 1 A Messianic interpretation of the invasion of Gog and Magog is given 
 in the Talmud (Weber, "System," 87). By some it is held to precede, by 
 others to follow, the reign of the Messiah. 
 
 2 The number 1,000 of the years of Satan's imprisonment was perhaps 
 suggested by Ps xc. 4, or it may be merely a natural expression of a long 
 space of time (cf. Ezekiel's employment of the same unit, Ezek. xlviii.). 
 
 8 So in 1 Cor. xv. 23-28. Here death is the last of the enemies that Christ 
 is to subdue when he shall come. Paul adds that the Messianic reign will 
 then come to an end, swallowed up in the reign of God. A similar view seems 
 to be given in Kev. xx. xxi.
 
 ESCHATOLOGY. 375 
 
 late date of the present form of the Persian eschatological 
 writings (some centuries after the beginning of our era), 
 though they doubtless rest on earlier beliefs, makes it pre- 
 carious to assume that these ideas affected the Jews so 
 early as the second or first pre-Christian century, when 
 Jewish Messianic systems first make their appearance. Fur- 
 ther, the Jewish development would seem to be satisfac- 
 torily accounted for from the native material. On the other 
 hand, it is possible to suppose an influence in the opposite 
 direction, of Judaism and Christianity on Mazdeism. The 
 data seem insufficient to decide the question. If the ex- 
 istence of the Bundehesh scheme in the second century B. c. 
 could be made probable, we might suppose that it colored 
 the Jewish Messianic ideas somewhat as the Mazdean dual- 
 ism colored the idea of Satan. So far as regards the ma- 
 chinery of the New Testament Apocalypse, the dragon, 
 the beast, etc., this may be explained out of Jewish ma- 
 terial and the historical conditions of the first century. In 
 any case, the moral-religious ideas involved in the Messianic 
 eschatology are thoroughly Jewish and Christian. 1 
 
 The details of the picture belong to the thought of the 
 times. As a history of the future blessedness of the saints, 
 this passage has always awakened the interest and excited 
 the curiosity of the Church. By the author and many oth- 
 ers of that generation, doubtless, the fulfilment of the pre- 
 diction was believed to be imminent; but generation after 
 generation passed, the Eoman Empire remained as before, 
 and the time of fulfilment was deferred. So ever since in 
 every age there have been those who expected the speedy 
 coming of the Lord and the introduction of the final dis- 
 
 1 On the Persian eschatology, besides the works above mentioned, page 
 172, see the discussions of Roth, and compare works on the Jewish doctrine 
 of the Messiah. On the supposed composite Jewish and Christian consti- 
 tution of the Apocalypse, see the treatises of Vischer, Sabatier, and others. A 
 comparative history of Messianic ideas in all religions has yet to be written.
 
 376 ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 pensation of blessedness. The historical interpretation of 
 the various characters and events of the apocalyptic visions 
 has varied with the mutations of history ; but the confidence 
 as to the issue has not lessened among those who regarded 
 this book as a divinely revealed picture of the future. The 
 effect of this faith on the life of the Church has not been 
 great. It was an inheritance of Christianity from Judaism. 
 For the Jews it had a national-political significance, and it 
 was a transfer of the idea of earthly order to the scheme 
 of the universe. There was to be a final settlement, an en- 
 forced peace and stability, like that which a conqueror im- 
 poses on subject lands. In no other way could that age 
 conceive of the triumph of truth ; and the Christianity of 
 the first century naturally appropriated this mechanical gov- 
 ernmental view. The king of the Apocalypse rules with a 
 rod of iron ; and Paul conceives of the reign of the Mes- 
 siah as a warfare, he must reign till he has put all ene- 
 mies under his feet. Still, even in the first century this 
 aspect of the kingdom of God is gradually modified. The 
 spiritual gradually replaces the external ; the hope of the 
 Lord's earthly coming is more and more swallowed up in 
 the larger hope of heaven, the individual hope, the fulfil- 
 ment of which death brought to every believer. The expec- 
 tation of Christ's coming has been mainly a moral element in 
 Christianity. It has not affected the properly religious dogma 
 or the organization of the Church. It has sustained men in 
 adversity ; it has produced enthusiasm or fanaticism. It has 
 not quickened thought, or promoted real social-religious prog- 
 ress. For the first century it was probably valuable as an 
 outward support for the struggling and feebly founded faith 
 (Jas. v. 7 ; 1 Thess. iv. 13-18 ; v. 1-11 ; 2 Thess. i. 3-12 ; 1 Cor. 
 xv. 19 ; xvi. 22 ; 1 Pet. iv. 7-19 ; Rev. passim). 
 
 Its significance has become less and less ; that is, the 
 stress laid on the particular outward form has been grad-
 
 ESCHATOLOGY. 377 
 
 ually diminishing, and Christian feeling has tended more 
 and more to emphasize the spiritual content of the idea. 
 The Church more and more holds itself to be the visible 
 kingdom of God on earth, its struggle and life to be spirit- 
 ual, its aim the regeneration of humanity ; and this result, 
 it holds, is to be effected by the employment of ordinary 
 ethical-spiritual agencies. The Church feels that its func- 
 tion is not to sit passively waiting for the Lord, but rather 
 to conquer the world for him. The germ of this conception 
 is found in the Old Testament ; it is the prophetic exhorta- 
 tion that Israel shall make possible the Lord's intervention 
 by obedience and trust, by the attainment of moral perfect- 
 ness. This ethical conception was set in the political frame- 
 work which belonged to the ideas of the age. Christianity 
 received it from Judaism with certain modifications ; and 
 the progress of Christian life has consisted in part in cut- 
 ting away this framework and returning to the simplest con- 
 ception of moral regeneration. The reign of Christ signifies 
 the reign of ethical purity and true religion, the establish- 
 ment of moral order. The Church is more concerned with 
 the end than with the means ; or rather, it recognizes the 
 fact that the burden of responsibility rests on itself. And 
 this, it would seem, was the idea of Jesus : the regeneration 
 of humanity brought about by individual purity and faith- 
 fulness, the love of God and the love of man the two fac- 
 tors which were to raise human life to its full proportions 
 of purity and majesty, and bring it into intimate union with 
 the complete and everlasting life of the divine father. 
 
 2. Christianity received from Judaism the doctrines of im- 
 mortality and resurrection. They appear in the earliest of 
 Paul's Epistles, and it may be assumed that they formed a 
 part of the material of Christian thought in the middle of 
 the first century of our era. The history of their genesis 
 must be sought in the Judaism of the preceding centuries.
 
 378 ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 The first distinct announcement of immortality, in our 
 sense of the word, is found in the Wisdom of Solomon, a 
 work which belongs not far from 200 B. c. The Old Testa- 
 ment, if we except the book of Daniel, takes no hopeful 
 view of the future life. Everywhere we find the old Semitic 
 conception of a colorless existence in Sheol : a gloomy under- 
 world with gates and bars, tenanted by joyless shades, whose 
 existence runs a gray, uncheckered course, unilluminated by 
 the ordinary emotions of men, unstimulated by their ordi- 
 nary aims and hopes, severed from the life of the great world 
 above, and cut off from living communion with God. In 
 the early times it was believed that by magic arts the dead 
 might be brought up to tell the secrets of the living. Sam- 
 uel rises to crush the unhappy Saul by a prediction of defeat 
 and death. Necromancy was rife in Isaiah's time (Isa. viii. 
 19). But the better minds of Israel deplored and opposed 
 this remnant of paganism. Why, said they, go to the dead 
 in behalf of the living ? The appeal, they felt, must be to 
 the divine law as spoken by the prophets (Isa. viii.). If the 
 people refused this only lawful means of instruction, it was 
 because they had no true religious light in them. Necro- 
 mancy was in those times inseparably connected with rude, 
 debasing beliefs and rites. The struggle of the prophets was 
 to banish all other worships but that of Yahwe, and to 
 lead the nation to look to the prophetic word alone for all 
 guidance in life. Thus opposed to the genius of Israelitism, 
 the practice of consulting the shades fell gradually into dis- 
 use. The dead were left in their nether abode, forever iso- 
 lated from the genuine life of upper earth, and excluded from 
 the sympathies of the living except in so far as they fur- 
 nished examples of good or evil, or were the foundations of 
 divine promises which underlay the development of the na- 
 tion. Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and David lived in the mem- 
 ory of the pious ; were the bearers of divine messages and
 
 ESCHATOLOGY. 379 
 
 hopes, but only as denizens of the upper world. They lived 
 in the past ; their present in Sheol was forgotten or un- 
 regarded. At least, this is true so far as the records go. 
 Never is there reference or allusion to them as still truly 
 alive in Sheol, never a hint that they are supposed to follow 
 with intelligence and interest the fortunes of their fellow- 
 countrymen. Jacob shows no interest in the history of his 
 twelve sons ; David is unconcerned about the political pros- 
 perity of his realm, and Solomon indifferent to the career of 
 the temple. Only once in the Old Testament is there any 
 hint of emotion in the shades of Sheol : when the proud king 
 of Babylon, overthrown and slain, descends to the realms 
 below, the inmates greet his arrival with a cry of malignant 
 satisfaction. Thy glory is departed, they say ; thou art be- 
 come as one of us (Isa. xiv. 9, 10). It is as if all their life 
 was compressed into one gloomy consciousness of failure 
 and nothingness, their only joy coming from the spectacle of 
 others' misery. It is the only approach in the Old Testa- 
 ment to the later conception of a future place of torment. 
 
 There are some passages in the Old Testament which have 
 been supposed to contain the hope of immortality ; but these 
 all, under careful examination, appear to regard the presence 
 of God only in this life. The declaration of the Sixteenth 
 Psalm " Thou wilt not abandon me to Sheol nor suffer thy 
 godly one to see the pit; thou wilt show me the path of 
 life ; in thy presence is fulness of joy, in thy right hand 
 there are pleasures forevermore " sets forth the writer's 
 complete satisfaction and security in the divine presence 
 and protection. " Yahwe," says he, " is my portion, is at my 
 right hand ; wherefore I am glad, since he will not give me 
 over to death, but will keep me in life, his presence securing 
 all safety and joy." It is the present, the earthly life, of 
 which he is thinking, and the deliverance from that pre- 
 mature death which was the portion of the wicked (Ps. ix.
 
 380 ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 17), and was esteemed the greatest misfortune. In like man- 
 ner we must understand the concluding verse of the Seven- 
 teenth Psalm. The writer, confident of his own integrity 
 (verse 3), asks for protection against the prosperous wicked. 
 They, he says, are filled with treasure ; and then, contrast- 
 ing his own situation, he adds : " As for me, I behold thy 
 face in righteousness ; I am satisfied, when I awake, with 
 thee." He means that over against the present worldly pros- 
 perity of the wicked he himself is satisfied to have God on 
 his side, secure by this fact of ultimate success and happi- 
 ness in this life. The expression, " when I awake," cannot 
 refer to the resurrection after death ; so important a fact 
 would not be mentioned in this incidental manner, and the 
 point under discussion is earthly well-being. The psalm may 
 be an evening or morning hymn. The writer seems to have 
 in mind the night (verse 3), or he may mean to say, in 
 general, that when he awakes every morning, he is perfectly 
 satisfied to have with him, not the power of his wicked ene- 
 mies, but the presence of the God of Israel, in whose hand 
 man's might is as nothing. 1 The strong expression of Ps. 
 xlix. 15 (Heb. 16), "God will redeem me from the hand of 
 Sheol," is identical in meaning with the similar expression 
 in Ps. xvi. The hope expressed in Ps. Ixxi. 20, " Thou who 
 hast showed us many and sore troubles shalt quicken us 
 again, and bring us up again from the depths of the earth," 
 is shown by the context to relate to the restoration of 
 earthly comfort and greatness. It seems equally clear that 
 the striking passage in the Seventy-Third Psalm (verse 24), 
 
 1 The expression "awake" is used of resurrection in Dan. xii. 2, and this 
 psalm might belong to the same period (middle of second century u. c.) ; 
 but Daniel plainly affirms the rising from the dead, while the thought of 
 the psalm points in another direction. Further, Daniel contemplates a new 
 life on earth, while the psalm-expression, if held to refer to the resurrection, 
 would seem to involve the far more advanced conception of dwelling, prob- 
 ably in heaven, in the presence of God. .
 
 ESCHATOLOGY. 381 
 
 "Thou shalt guide me with thy counsel and afterward re- 
 ceive me to glory," refers only to the present life. The 
 author has been deeply moved by the spectacle of the pros- 
 perity of the wicked. It was too painful for him, he says, 
 until he went to the sanctuary of God and saw their latter 
 end, how they were consumed and cast down to destruc- 
 tion. He deplores his own ignorance and thoughtlessness 
 in thus misconceiving the problem ; yet, he adds, he is con- 
 tinually with God, upheld and guided by him, taken by him 
 into a position of glory and happiness. In the heavens among 
 the gods and on earth among men, he desires no helper but 
 the God of Israel. They that are far from God shall perish 
 (with earthly destruction) ; but as for him, he draws near 
 to the Lord and makes him his refuge. Here it is still the 
 present life of which the author is thinking. The precise 
 meaning of the familiar passage in Job xix. (verses 25-27) is 
 obscured by the corrupt character of the text. It is almost 
 impossible to give a satisfactory translation of verse 26, 
 and difficult to render verses 25 and 27. If we follow the 
 guidance of the immediate context, we shall be inclined to 
 hold that Job has in mind here only the earthly life. Why, 
 oh, my friends, he exclaims, do you persecute me ? Oh, that 
 my words were written in a book, that the grounds of my 
 defence against my accusers might be known ; yet I am 
 sure that my vindicator will at last appear ; and do you, 
 if you purpose still to persecute me, be afraid of the sword. 
 There is a judgment for evil-doers! 
 
 Regarding these passages, then, as at least not decisive, 
 it may be said that the Old Testament elsewhere (except 
 in Daniel) persistently ignores the underworld as a motive 
 for the present life. It is always with a tone of sadness 
 that it speaks of Sheol. The dead cannot praise thee, ex- 
 claims the pious soul, lifting itself in supplication to God ; 
 the living, they shall praise thee. The psalm of thanks-
 
 382 ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 
 
 giving ascribed to King Hezekiah (Isa. xxxviii.) is the ex- 
 pression of complete hopelessness in regard to the other 
 life ; similar representations are found in the book of Psalms. 
 Everywhere a long life is esteemed the greatest of blessings, 
 and all beyond this world is ignored ; punishment consists 
 not in pains in Sheol, but in the fact of the termination of 
 earthly life, which is the cessation of all joyful and produc- 
 tive activity. The sanctions of the Mosaic law are wholly 
 temporal. Not once does it urge men to obedience by the 
 portraiture of future happiness or misery. 1 
 
 It is the old Semitic conception of the other life. The 
 Babylonian-Assyrian literature which we possess is as reti- 
 cent as the Hebrew respecting the future as a moral 
 element of the present life. Penitential psalms, where if 
 anywhere we might expect a reference to the other life, con- 
 fine themselves altogether to this world. The poem which 
 describes the descent of the goddess Ishtar to Sheol gives 
 indeed a striking picture of the underworld and its gates 
 and bars and its presiding goddess, but has nothing to say 
 of rewards and punishments for earthly lives. The case is 
 the same with such fragments as remain of older Phoenician 
 literature, and with the pre-Islamic Arabian poetry. The 
 silence is all the more remarkable when we compare it with 
 the full and varied declarations of the Egyptian ritual. For 
 the Egyptian the world below was a completely organized 
 kingdom ; divine judges scrutinized each man's life and 
 meted out to him his fit portion of reward or punishment. 
 The future was ever present in men's minds as an incentive 
 to good living ; there was the hope of entrance into the 
 blessed abodes and of assimilation to the gods themselves, 
 and the fear of degradation and suffering. From time im- 
 memorial this elaborate scheme had existed in Egypt; and 
 
 1 An ingenious but unwarranted turn is given to this fact in Warburton's 
 " Divine Legation of Moses."
 
 ESCHATOLOGY. 383 
 
 that the Israelites remained so long strangers to it is proof 
 that they were never in lively intellectual intercourse with 
 their Southern neighbors till the Greek conquest established 
 a Jewish colony in Alexandria. There was in this regard a 
 great gap between the Egyptian and Semitic races. We may 
 perhaps refer the silence of the Semites on this point to their 
 lack of constructive imagination. The divine, indeed, was 
 ever present to them as a main factor in life. God forced 
 himself on their notice in all the phenomena of nature. 
 They felt in extraordinary degree the pressure of the out- 
 ward powers, powers which determined the actual course of 
 their daily lives, which shaped their fortunes and demanded 
 their reverence. As practical men of the world they felt the 
 necessity of recognizing and propitiating the divine. But 
 this very practicalness of nature led them to ignore that 
 unseen world which could not force itself on their attention 
 by any visible or tangible phenomenon. The result of their 
 cool judgment was that the nether realm, to which all men 
 indeed must descend, stood apart from the present life, in- 
 capable in any perceptible way of influencing its issues. 
 Their imagination recoiled from the effort of solving its 
 mysteries. A similar lack of constructive power among the 
 Semites is visible in other departments of thought. They 
 have no drama, no metaphysic. With immense power of 
 dealing with current facts (especially those relating to com- 
 merce and religion), they have never succeeded in the organi- 
 zation of conceptions. Imagination they have, but only in 
 the sphere of the actual and practical. For them the under- 
 world was too remote to tempt them to the invention of a 
 nether organized community. This is part of the explana- 
 tion of the enormous success of the Jews in practical life. 
 They concentrated their efforts on the present. Here on this 
 earth in the clash and conflict of this life, they served God 
 and their age after their fashion, and looked for rewards and
 
 384 ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 punishments. And that high spirituality may go along with 
 such a negative conception of the future is abundantly proved 
 by the glowing spiritual utterances of the Old Testament. 
 
 We have already observed a general and gradual increase 
 of spirituality in the pre-Christian Jewish literature, a dis- 
 tincter sense of the vital ethical relationship between God 
 and the human soul. This feeling of the dependence of man 
 on God, the longing of the heart for friendly intercourse, 
 might very well exist without belief in immortality ; it might 
 and doubtless often did spring partly from a profound sense 
 of ethical weakness and desire for ethical perfectness, and 
 partly from the non-ethical feeling of the need of protec- 
 tion ; l it might have its roots in sentiments which belonged 
 wholly to the present life. But it also naturally connected 
 itself with another human instinct, the desire for continu- 
 ance and permanence. There is little indication, as has already 
 been remarked, in tbe Hebrew feeling of the Old Testament 
 times, of a projection of such hope beyond the grave ; yet we 
 can hardly doubt that many a man of those times looked 
 curiously across the gulf that separated the present from the 
 future and asked himself what it was that the God of Israel 
 had in store for his people; to many a one there would 
 come perhaps a glimmer of hope, or a more or less distinct 
 demand of the soul. This demand and this hope would be 
 heightened by the increasing spirituality of the conception of 
 the relation between God and his people. The devout soul, 
 conscious that its life was in God, would more and more 
 recoil from the prospect of banishment from him ; intense 
 desire might lift itself into the form of belief. There had 
 long been faith in national immortality ; the prophets think 
 
 1 These two elements must be carefully distinguished in the Psalms. Not 
 every appeal to God is spiritual. There is much religiousness that is uneth- 
 ical, a mere selfish desire for aid, which is a feeling common to man with the 
 lower animals. It is not sufficient that God he invoked ; there must be the 
 effort to attain communion of soul with him as the ideal of holiness.
 
 ESCHATOLOGY. 385 
 
 of the people as continuing forever. As the sentiment of 
 individuality became more sharply defined, the pious soul, 
 one might expect, would be less and less satisfied with this 
 communal continuance of life, and would assert its rights to 
 its own individual permanence in and by virtue of its rela- 
 tion to God. And of this forthreaching of the soul toward 
 everlasting life, there may be indications in the psalm- 
 passages quoted above, not distinct declarations nor cer- 
 tain hopes, but dim surmises and longings. Such feelings 
 could hardly have been general ; the tone of the Old Testa- 
 ment respecting immortality is too distinctly negative to 
 permit such a supposition. Perhaps a few gifted souls 
 passed beyond the limits of the current thought ; there 
 was possibly a definite desire which might be the germ of 
 a doctrine of immortality. But a defined doctrine there 
 was not. Up to the beginning of the second century B. c., 
 there was no such conception of life beyond the grave as 
 furnished moral support and stimulus for the present life. 
 Job, Psalms, Proverbs, the books, in which if anywhere 
 we should expect to find the best outcome of thought in 
 this direction, still occupy the old Semitic point of view. 
 
 It is in a book written under Greek influence that we 
 find the first distinct declaration of a real doctrine of immor- 
 tality. About the beginning of the second century B. c., 
 three books were composed by Jewish writers, who sought 
 to set forth a finished conception of wisdom, that wisdom 
 which was esteemed to be the highest quality of man, the 
 broad and high conception of life, which was held to lift 
 man above its ills, to ally him with its highest powers, and 
 endow him with its greatest blessings. Of these books, that 
 which is most decidedly negative in tone (reflecting prob- 
 ably the Greek sceptical philosophy of the time), Eccle- 
 siastes, was received into the third Jewish canon, on 
 grounds which are discussed above. It not only completely 
 
 25
 
 386 ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 ignores the future life, but treats the present as something 
 which offers no high hope ; it defines wisdom as a large 
 and genial economy of resources, a pleasant, forbearing, 
 sceptical, and catholic moderation. The second work, Eccle- 
 siasticus, which resembles in form the canonical book of 
 Proverbs, was apparently composed in Palestine, and cer- 
 tainly under the control of old Jewish modes of thought. 
 Though modern and fresh in its material, and full of striking 
 and suggestive remark, it has no word to say of the future 
 life. In marked contrast with the other two, the Wisdom 
 of Solomon, which shows unmistakable signs of the influ- 
 ence of Platonic and Stoic ideas, treats immortality as an 
 established fact, as one of the main elements of the present 
 life. The old question which so troubled and indeed dis- 
 couraged and staggered many Jewish thinkers he inter- 
 pretation of the sufferings of the righteous and the prosperity 
 of the wicked causes our author no anxiety. He does 
 not even discuss it ; he assumes the solution to lie in the 
 life beyond the grave, where the inequalities of the present 
 life shall be equalized, where righteous and wicked shall 
 receive their just compensations and take their true places 
 in God's world. 
 
 One might then suspect that it was in some Alexandrian 
 Jewish circle, tinged with Greek thought, that the doctrine 
 of a true, everlasting life took distinct shape. Yet it is 
 not easy to find the Greek thought of that period which 
 might have suggested or determined such a faith. Eccle- 
 siastes was written by a man who had tasted the Hellenic cul- 
 ture of his day ; but the point which he reached was as far as 
 possible from the confident, joyous tone of belief in immor- 
 tality. It may be surmised that it was from the school 
 which had established itself at Gyrene that he took the 
 hue of his conception of life ; he has the cool scepticism 
 and good-natured indifference of the earlier Cyrenaic philoso-
 
 ESCHATOLOGY. 387 
 
 phy, which might often be combined with strict ethical 
 principle and exemplariness of life. It was not here that 
 the author of the Wisdom of Solomon got his inspiration. 
 It was rather, if we are to look to a Greek source, from 
 some current of the old Platonism which survived the dis- 
 solution of the original systems of philosophy. In the third 
 century B. c. men began to grow weary of metaphysical 
 speculation and to seek for practical schemes of life. 1 Stoi- 
 cism and Epicureanism split up into various schools, which 
 all tended toward the same ethical result and toward the 
 same metaphysical negations. But in Alexandria there was 
 something which might quicken afresh the hopes concern- 
 ing the future. The Egyptian people maintained their faith 
 in the life beyond; their literature and their art, which 
 could not remain wholly unknown to Jews and Greeks, 
 kept the reality of this life prominent before men's eyes. 
 The whole of Egyptian thought was so permeated and col- 
 ored by a living faith in the tremendous importance of the 
 future existence that no thoughtful foreigner could fail to 
 be impressed by it. It was seed which might find favor- 
 able soil among both Jews and Greeks; for both these 
 peoples there were lines of hope or belief going back gen- 
 erations to honored names, which might impel certain minds 
 to look with intense interest on the spectacle of a nation 
 which thus realized and honored the life to come. It was, 
 perhaps, from a fusion of these lines of thought that the 
 well-defined theory of immortality came into the world. The 
 Greek, trained in habits of philosophic reflection, might 
 find himself disposed to adopt the essential ethical content 
 of the Egyptian scheme, while he rejected the local mytho- 
 logical machinery. But for him it would still be only a 
 philosophical opinion. The Jew, seizing on this Egyptian 
 hope, purified by Greek philosophy, could raise it to the 
 
 1 On the history of Greek philosophy after Plato, see Zeller.
 
 388 ESCHATOLOGT. 
 
 dignity of a religious dogma. When once it had com- 
 mended itself to his mind as the solution of the highest 
 problems of life, he would find hints or demonstrations of 
 it in his own Scriptures, in the lives of the patriarchs, in 
 the translation of Enoch and Elijah, in the words of the 
 prophets, in the spiritual longing of the Psalms. Such 
 was the method of Philo a couple of centuries later, and 
 such seems to have been the method of the author of the 
 Wisdom of Solomon ; at least one would be inclined to 
 infer that the review which he gives of the Israelitish his- 
 tory at the close of his book is regarded by him as an illus- 
 tration of the doctrines of immortality and wisdom with 
 which he begins. The Jews, like other nations, have always 
 found in their Scriptures suggestions or proofs of beliefs 
 which they from time to time adopted. 
 
 There is no complete documentary proof of the view above 
 suggested. But it appears that while the national devel- 
 opment of the native Jewish thought had not up to the 
 beginning of the second century led to a belief in immor- 
 tality, the doctrine is announced by a Jew who, while an 
 orthodox and fervent adherent of his own national religion, 
 was yet materially influenced by foreign ideas. We are thus 
 naturally led to refer the origin of the doctrine to a fusion 
 of the Jewish and non-Jewish elements. 
 
 3. In like manner the closely related idea of a bodily 
 return from the underworld is probably to be accounted 
 for by the influence of foreign thought. The doctrine of 
 the resurrection of the dead appears for the first time toward 
 the middle of the second century B. c. The germ of such 
 a belief has been supposed to exist in purely Jewish parts 
 of the Old Testament, in Ezekiel's vision of the dry bones 
 (Ezek. xxxvii.), in Isa. xxvi. 19, in Job xix. 25-27, and in some 
 of the Psalms (Ps. xvi. 10; xvii. 15). One might even be 
 disposed to say that the dimness of the old Hebrew con-
 
 ESCHATOLOGY. 389 
 
 ception of the underworld would naturally lead to the idea 
 of the resuscitation of the dead. So strong was the hold 
 which the earth and earthly life had on the Jew, so intense 
 his conviction that the enjoyment of God, whether bodily 
 or spiritual, pertained to this present worldly existence, that 
 if his religious instinct should demand a perpetuation of 
 happy life, he would, it might be supposed, naturally think 
 of its sphere as mundane, and its conditions as those which 
 belong to man's present and visible activity ; it would be the 
 man of body and soul whom he would naturally imagine as 
 the bearer of truth and the recipient of blessing from the 
 divine hand. Yet however natural such an idea might seem 
 to be, there is no trace of it- in Jewish literature before the 
 second century B. c. We have already seen how vague was 
 the conception of the future life in general ; and there is 
 little reason to suppose a development of the idea of resur- 
 rection while the Sheol of that day remained unquestioned. 
 The passages above cited have really nothing to do with the 
 resurrection ; the prophet Ezekiel himself explains (xxxvii. 
 11-14) that in the vision of the revivification of the dead 
 bones he means to give a symbolical prediction of the resto- 
 ration of Israel to its OWH land. It was not that the in- 
 dividual should live again after death, but that the nation, 
 though crushed and shattered and politically dead, should 
 not perish, but should be lifted into an everlasting political 
 life. The reference in Isa. xxvi. 19, as appears from the 
 whole course of thought (see verses 15 and 20), is to a similar 
 national restoration. The passage in Job, so far as can be 
 gathered from the corrupt text, declares that the sufferer 
 shall see God, not in his flesh, but apart from it. The Six- 
 teenth Psalm is a profession of satisfaction and delight in 
 Yahwe, not in the future, but in the present life ; and the 
 " awaking " of Psalm xvii. refers, as the context almost cer- 
 tainly indicates, to this present life of ethical-religious prob-
 
 390 ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 lems, in which the psalmist purposes to attain to trust and 
 tranquillity in spite of the rampant prosperity of the wicked. 
 The translations of Enoch and Elijah are not examples of 
 resurrection, but exceptional cases of removal from earth 
 without the ordinary process of death, a survival of the 
 primitive belief, according to which heroes were elevated to 
 positions in the abode of the gods. 
 
 It is apparently to non-Jewish sources that we must look 
 for the formulation of the doctrine of the resurrection. The 
 conception of the bodily re-clothing of man after death had 
 been in the world a long time before it appears in Jewish 
 books. It is found in rude forms in primitive faiths, and 
 had survived, in developed shape, in various religions, though 
 the Semites, with their unimaginative scepticism, seem to 
 have rejected it altogether. In the form of transmigration 
 of souls it was held by the Egyptians and the Hindus. 
 There is, however, no indication that the Jews of this period 
 came into contact with the religious thought of India ; and 
 the Egyptian doctrine seems not to have been distinct or 
 impressive enough to suggest what we find in the Jewish 
 belief of the time. It is probably to another point that we 
 have to look. The book of Daniel, which contains the first 
 statement of the resurrection in the Old Testament, shows 
 considerable acquaintance with Babylonian and Old Persian 
 history, and points to a connection with the Tigris-Euphrates 
 region. The author writes like a man who, dwelling in what 
 had formerly been the native land of Cyrus, had there met 
 with a real though apparently not perfectly correct his- 
 torical tradition, and had come into contact with the ideas 
 of the place. Certain traces of Persian influence in the 
 book have already been referred to ; the angelology has ob- 
 viously a Persian coloring, and it would seem that we must 
 seek in the Persian eschatology the origin of the author's 
 doctrine of resurrection.
 
 ESCHATOLOGY. 391 
 
 Our information respecting Persian religious beliefs of 
 this period is unfortunately very meagre. The inscriptions 
 of the first Achiemenian princes, the earliest extant Per- 
 sian documents, are concerned mainly with political affairs, 
 and their religious utterances are naturally brief and in- 
 direct. If the date of the Avestan writings, in the form in 
 which we now possess them, could be definitely fixed, we 
 should be able to speak more advisedly of the Persian dog- 
 mas of the fourth and third centuries B. c. ; but the best 
 Avestan scholars regard the data as insufficient to deter- 
 mine the chronology with exactness. All that can be said 
 is that Magism (probably a Median form of faith) obtained 
 a firm footing in Persia during the fifth century B. a So 
 much we may infer from the description of Persian customs 
 given by Herodotus (I. 131140), in which the Magi appear 
 as the only official priests Herodotus says nothing of the 
 Magian-Persian doctrine of the future life ; l but the details 
 given by Theopompus (fourth century B. c.), as quoted by 
 Plutarch (Isis and Osiris, 47), lead us to suppose that a 
 doctrine of the resurrection existed in his time. At the 
 end of the contest between Oromazes and Areimanios, says 
 Theopompus, Hades will be abandoned, and men will be 
 happy, neither needing food nor casting a shadow ; that is 
 to say, they will be endowed with new spiritual bodies. The 
 supposition that the Magian-Persian religion recognized the 
 bodily resurrection as early as the fourth century B. c. is 
 not at all opposed to what we otherwise know of the per- 
 sistence of the Zoroastrian dogma. If, as seems probable, 
 the Avestan writings existed substantially in their present 
 form some centuries before the beginning of our era, it is 
 likely that this doctrine, connecting itself, as it does, so 
 naturally with the whole Zoroastrian scheme, had already 
 assumed definite shape as early as the Greek conquest. It 
 
 1 But cf. Herod. III. 62.
 
 392 ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 might have come to the knowledge of Alexandrian Jews 
 through such Greek writings as those of Theopompus, while 
 it would linger in the Persian population still found in the 
 Tigris region, and there, as has already been suggested, find 
 its way to the Jewish colony which was at that time 
 marked, as we have good reason to believe, by eager intel- 
 lectual activity. The Jews have ever been willing borrow- 
 ers of other nations' opinions ; and such an idea as that of 
 the resurrection of the body would harmonize with one side 
 of Jewish thought and be absorbed by Jewish theology. 
 The idea of the permanence of the national life had always 
 been cherished by Israelites, and at a time when the hope 
 of deliverance was keen, and the interposition of God was 
 looked for, the suggestion that the nation's dead would be 
 called back to earth to share in the nation's life might 
 meet with welcome reception from ardent Jewish thinkers 
 and believers. Its progress might be slow ; a couple of cen- 
 turies might elapse before it would be generally accepted. 
 It would naturally be adopted slowly and cautiously by the 
 leaders of Jewish thought, with such modifications as the 
 old Jewish national faith suggested. The books of Psalms, 
 Proverbs, and Ecclesiasticus know nothing of it, and the 
 Mosaic law is equally silent. The doctrine seems never to 
 have been received by the Sadducees (Matt. xxii. xxiii.), the 
 priestly representatives of the old Mosaic orthodoxy. At 
 first, as might be anticipated, the bodily resuscitation seems 
 to have been limited to Israel ; such appears to be the idea 
 in Daniel (xii. 1-3). Israel alone, it was apparently sup- 
 posed, was worthy of the supreme blessing of the everlast- 
 ing perpetuation of the earthly life. Other peoples might 
 be left to endure the inanity of the shadowy existence in 
 Sheol ; they had no covenant with God ; there was no reason 
 why they should be lifted again into the struggle of earthly 
 life. Indeed, it might have appeared necessary for the peace
 
 ESCHATOLOGY. 393 
 
 of the chosen people that they alone should possess the 
 earth, though on this point there was probably indefinite- 
 ness arid difference of opinion. Daniel recognizes two classes 
 of Israelites, one of which should awake to everlasting life, 
 the other to shame and everlasting contempt. Here is the 
 germ of the conception of a moral distinction among those 
 who were raised from the dead. In process of time the 
 doctrine of bodily resuscitation connected itself with that 
 of final judgment, and with it approached the form of uni- 
 versality. This development of the doctrine seems to have 
 been formulated not long before the beginning of our era. 
 The second book of Maccabees (vii. 9, 14, 23), .a work of 
 uncertain date, possibly to be put about 100 B. c., apparently 
 affirms resurrection only of Israel. One of the seven brothers 
 says to the king : " It is good, being put to death by men, 
 to look for hope from God to be raised up again by him. 
 As for thee, thou shalt have no resurrection to life." On 
 the other hand, the Parables of the book of Enoch appear 
 to speak of a general resurrection. " In those days," says 
 the writer, " the earth will return that intrusted to it, and 
 Sheol will return that intrusted to it, which it has received, 
 and Hell will return what it owes," apparently a declara- 
 tion that all men, good and bad, will rise from the dead. 
 
 How far the doctrine of a general resurrection prevailed 
 during the first century of our era is not clear. It is found 
 in the Fourth Gospel (v. 28, 29), and apparently in the 
 Apocalypse (xx. 12). These books probably vouch for its 
 prevalence toward the end of the century. But in the 
 Synoptics and the writings of Paul and his school, though 
 there is much about immortality and judgment and the 
 resurrection of believers, no stress is laid on the rising of 
 all men ; it is even doubtful whether it is affirmed. Paul, 
 in his argument for the resurrection (1 Cor. xv.), treats the 
 rising from the dead as a purely Christian hope belonging
 
 394 ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 to believers by virtue of their union with Christ. 1 Eom. ii. 
 1-16 and 2 Cor. v, 10 speak only of judgment, and in the lat- 
 ter passage it is not certain that the " we " includes any but 
 Christians. He everywhere lays stress on the resurrection 
 of Jesus in such a way as to show that he regards the raised 
 body of the Eedeemer as the pledge and the centre of the 
 future blessed bodily existence of believers, as, therefore, 
 offering no hope to the world at large. The ground adduced 
 in the First Gospel (xxii. 31, 32) for the resurrection relates 
 only to the chosen people : " I am the God of Abraham and 
 the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob ; God is not the God 
 of the dead, but of the living." 2 The parables of the tares 
 and of the net, and the great assize (Matt. xiii. xxv.), affirm 
 not a general resurrection, but only the separation of the 
 righteous and the wicked at the end of the age. We might 
 thus be led to suspect that the doctrine in its general form 
 did not establish itself till toward the end of the first cen- 
 tury, when Christianity had with some definiteness separated 
 from Judaism. Such a view would find support in the fact 
 (Weber, " System," 88) that the Talmudic-Midrashic litera- 
 ture recognizes only a resurrection of Israelites, holding it 
 to be a part of the reward of the righteous. In truth, the 
 restoration to bodily life is generally treated in the New 
 Testament as a reward of Christian faith. For unbelievers 
 there was no risen Eedeemer, no definite centre of activity 
 in the coming life. It might have been felt that for them 
 
 1 Though he introduces two general considerations, one (ethically low), 
 that without hope of the future there would he no sufficient reason for well- 
 doing (verse 32), the other based on the analogy of plant-life (verse 36), 
 he does not make a general application. 
 
 2 The argument, as stated, goes to establish not resurrection, but immor- 
 tality ; but it seems that the former was regarded as included in the latter, a 
 proof that the idea of resurrection was thoroughly ingrained in the popular 
 belief. The Old Testament passage cited (Ex. iii. 6) contains, in the inten- 
 tion of its author, no hint of immortality, but merely the declaration that 
 God would be faithful to the promises made to the fathers.
 
 ESCHATOLOGY. 395 
 
 it was enough that they were abandoned to an endless exist- 
 ence of suffering. We must then suppose that the broader 
 idea of the Enoch-Parables (li.) did not for a long time ob- 
 tain general recognition, 1 and was finally established through 
 the social intercourse that promoted belief in the equal 
 moral responsibility of all men. On the other hand, it is 
 possible that the idea existed, and is only not made promi- 
 nent or distinctly brought out, because interest was concen- 
 trated on the Church. In fact, the conception of a general 
 resurrection seems allied to that of a general judgment. In 
 any case it appears that resurrection is treated practically 
 in the New Testament (and this is true largely even in the 
 Apocalypse and the Fourth Gospel) as a reward of be- 
 lievers. Its psychological basis is the desire for the con- 
 tinuance of human life, of which the body was regarded 
 as a necessary element, though this body might be thought 
 of as perfected into a fit dwelling-place for the regenerated 
 soul (1 Cor. xv. 44). 
 
 4. Hand in hand with the three just mentioned the doc- 
 trine of a last judgment advanced to its final formulation, 
 proceeding from a national to a universal form. The gen- 
 eral notion of a divine decision respecting human conduct, 
 with appropriate rewards and punishments, belongs to the 
 essence of the conception of the deity. It is found loosely 
 expressed in primitive faiths, and in developed religions is 
 more definitely embodied in persons, in the Egyptian Osiris, 
 the Hindu Indra, the Persian Ahuramazda, the Babylonian 
 Shamash, the Greek Zeus, and the Eoman Jupiter. 2 The 
 
 1 It is open to the critic to suggest that the Enoch-passage in question 
 has been touched by a Christian hand. Otherwise it is not easy to account 
 for its ineffectiveness. The paucity of data, makes the history obscure. 
 
 2 It may be left undecided whether or how far the Jewish development of 
 the idea was affected by foreign influences At Alexandria the Egyptian 
 elaborate apparatus of underworld-judgment and the Athenian opinion (Plato, 
 Apology 32) would be well known. But the form in which the Jewish idea
 
 396 ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 progress of the idea was along three Hues : the ethical 
 elemeiit become more and more prominent ; individualism 
 took the place of nationalism ; and the judgment, from 
 being a purely earthly procedure, came to be regarded as 
 the boundary between this life and the next. The history 
 of the Jewish-Christian movement may be traced in general 
 outline, though the data leave much to be desired in fulness 
 and precision. 
 
 The ethical progress is tolerably well indicated in Old 
 Testament, Apocrypha, and New Testament. There is steady 
 advance in the standard of individual morality. In the Jew- 
 ish scheme, however, the moral judgments attributed to God, 
 though otherwise pure and high, are never quite free from 
 the taint of nationalism. From the eighth century B. c. on, 
 Yahwe is a just God within the national limits, punishing 
 unsparingly the sins of his own people ; but foreign nations 
 are judged mainly according to their relations of friendliness 
 or unfriendliness with Israel. 1 To be hostile to Israel was 
 itself a crime; and this non-ethical standard of judgment 
 clung to Judaism down to the times of the Talmud. Chris- 
 tianity did not wholly escape a similar limitation. Though 
 the Sermon on the Mount declares that God will judge men 
 simply according to the moral character of their conduct, 
 the followers of Jesus put the Church into the place of the 
 national Israel, and made acceptance of Jesus as Messiah 
 the basis of the divine decision (2 Thess. i. 8 ; 1 Cor. xvi. 22 ; 
 
 is worked out (Daniel, Enoch, etc.) does not suggest Greek influence, and 
 may be accounted for from native materials. 
 
 1 See, for example, Amos i. ii., Isa x., Nahum, Obadiah, Joel iii. (Heb. 
 iv.), and the very different estimates of Babylon given by the prophets of 
 Nebuchadnezzar's time (Jer. xxv. 9; xxix. 7; xxxviii. 17 ; Ezek. xxix. 17-21) 
 and those who lived when Cyrus' approach was expected (Isa. xiii. xiv. 
 xlvi. xlvii. ; Jer. 1. li ). Jeremiah and Ezekiel have not one unkind word to 
 say of Babylon, because it was, in their opinion, the protector of Israel ; but 
 the Babylonian kingdom, though its moral character could not have changed 
 materially in fifty years, is denounced so soon as it is regarded as hostile.
 
 ESCHATOLOGY. 397 
 
 1 John v. 10). Men were to be judged by their works (Rev. 
 xx. 12), but the " works " included belief in the Christ. The 
 general ethical standard was high, but a controlling non- 
 ethical condition was introduced. 
 
 Nevertheless, there was a gradual recession from the old 
 nationalistic point of view; that is, the individual came 
 more and more to be the human unit. The beginning of 
 this movement is seen, as has already been pointed out, in 
 such passages as Ezek. xviii., which affirms a moral distinc- 
 tion in the judgments on Israelites. The progress is clearer 
 in the Wisdom of Solomon and in the sayings of the law- 
 yers, which treat character without respect to nationality. 
 The mingling of peoples during the two centuries preceding 
 the beginning of our era led, in the better minds, to a par- 
 tial obliteration of national lines ; the feeling arose that there 
 was a definite relation between God and every human being. 
 The individual was no longer swallowed up in the com- 
 munity. It is doubtful, as is intimated above, whether the 
 divine judgment was ever in the Jewish and Christian de- 
 velopments completely sundered from religious dogma. It 
 was probably held that character acceptable to God could 
 never be attained apart from certain religious beliefs peculiar 
 to Judaism or Christianity. But it was a great point gained 
 when the conviction was established, as a living principle, 
 that each man must give account of himself, that the divine 
 judgment would be meted out to each on his own merits. 
 This principle, on which the New Testament everywhere 
 insists, existed indeed elsewhere, but was firmly planted in 
 society by the powerful agency of Christianity. 
 
 The conception of a universal judgment was involved in 
 the developed Hebrew religion. Yahwe was king and guard- 
 ian of his people ; and in order that he might assign them 
 their proper position in the world, it was necessary that 
 other nations should be cited before the divine tribunal and
 
 398 ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 judged for their offences against the chosen people. In the 
 pre-exilian and exilian prophets God is represented as admin- 
 istering punishment to the enemies of Israel from time to 
 time, as occasion demanded. A more formal judicial pro- 
 cedure is hinted at in Joel, Zechariah (xiv.), and some of the 
 Psalms (xcvi. xcviii.). The apocalyptic books of the second 
 century B. c. introduced more definitely the idea of a sum- 
 ming up of things and the inauguration of Israel's reign 
 by a general divine judgment (Dan. vii. ; Enoch i.). In 
 Daniel (xii.) this consummation is not unnaturally con- 
 nected with the return of dead Israelites to bodily life, the 
 pious to share in the national triumph, the apostates to 
 suffer merited punishment. God was the judge ; and the 
 scene of the judgment and of the succeeding life was on 
 the earth, probably Palestine (Enoch Ixxxix. 40). 1 It was 
 a reconstruction of earthly society, with Israel as centre 
 and lord. This was the simple national and earthly idea 
 of the final divine judgment that prevailed up to about the 
 middle of the second century B. c. Two other articles of 
 faith, recently adopted by the Jews, then took their place 
 in the scheme and gave rise to some complication of views, 
 these were the expectation of a personal Messiah, and the 
 belief in immortality. 
 
 It was only gradually that the deliverer, who finally re- 
 ceived the title of Messiah, was brought into connection 
 with the judgment. In the prophets he is a Davidic king, 
 employing the usual means of a political leader to secure 
 national success ; in Daniel he disappears, and the agent 
 of salvation is the angel Michael ; in the original Enoch 
 and the Psalter of Solomon he is a human leader. Up to 
 this point he has nothing to do with the final authorita- 
 tive reconstruction of the world. But there soon arose a 
 
 1 In Enoch i. the place of judgment seems to be Mount Sinai, though this 
 is not clear.
 
 ESCHATOLOGY. 399 
 
 new conception of his person and function ; he was repre- 
 sented as being of a very exalted (though not divine) 
 nature, and the immediate conduct of the final judgment 
 was assigned to him. Whether this new function was in- 
 ferred from the new nature, or the nature from the func- 
 tion, or both arose out of the same conditions, it is not 
 easy to say. It is in the Enoch-Parables that the higher 
 idea of the Messiah first appears. Here he is the chosen 
 one, set apart from all eternity, hidden and then revealed, 
 who, endowed with all wisdom, sits on his throne, receives 
 homage, judges powerful kings and all sinners, and dis- 
 penses rewards and punishments. The same conception of 
 Messianic judgment is contained in the earliest of Paul's 
 writings (1 Thess. iv. ; 2 Thess. i.), and perhaps in 2 Cor. 
 v. 10 ; it is involved in the apocalyptic letters to the 
 churches (Eev. ii. 23), and is distinctly affirmed in 2 Tim. 
 iv. 1 and John v. 27. On the other hand, in the apocalyptic 
 pictures, and especially in the great judicial scene at the 
 end of the book (Rev. xix. xx.) it is not quite clear whether 
 it is God or the Messiah who is the judge. The Lamb 
 opens the sealed book (v.), and all men flee from his 
 wrath (vi. 16) ; but seals, trumpets, and bowls usher in only 
 preliminary judgments, and the day of final decision is still 
 in the future. When that day comes, it is apparently God 
 before whose throne the dead appear (xx. II). 1 In the 
 Synoptics the Messiah appears as judge (as in 2 Thess.) 
 in the apocalyptic discourse (Mark xiii., Matt, xxiv., Luke 
 xxi.), and in the judgment-scene of Matt. xxv. According 
 to the later Jewish view (Weber, " System," 88), as it 
 would seem, the final judgment is conducted by God. 
 
 1 The similarity between the royal functions of the Messiah in the Enoch- 
 Parables and the New Testament Apocalypse is of such sort as to suggest 
 that the one was taken from the other, or that the two issue out of the same 
 circle of views. This favors the hypothesis that the Apocalypse contains a 
 Jewish basis which has been built upon by a Christian hand.
 
 400 ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 The evidence, with the exception of that of the Enoch- 
 Parables, points to a Christian origin for the conception of 
 the Messiah as final judge. In any case this function is 
 closely connected with an idealization of his person, which 
 lifted him above the ordinary human sphere, an exalta- 
 tion that is explained more naturally from Christian con- 
 ditions (following on the disappearance of Jesus from earth), 
 but cannot be said to be impossible for an earlier Jewish 
 circle of thought. It is possible that Paul's view was 
 affected by some current opinion like that of the Parables 
 (the date of which is probably not long after B. c. 40). A 
 Jewish idealization of the Messiah, arising from reflec- 
 tion on the great role assigned him as national deliverer, 
 may have coalesced with a similar Christian tendency. In 
 the Old Testament (as in Ps. ii.) the king of Israel is repre- 
 sented as ruling all the nations, whence to his elevation to 
 the position of judge at God's right hand (see Ps. ex.) it 
 would be no great step. It is always as God's vicegerent 
 that the Messiah exercises his judicial functions (John v. 22 ; 
 cf. 1 Cor. xv. 24). That the conception of the Messiah as 
 judge was gradually accepted by the Church of the first cen- 
 tury may perhaps be inferred from the infrequency of refer- 
 ence to it in the New Testament. Of the history of the idea 
 in the period between the Enoch-Parables and the First Epis- 
 tle to the Thessalonians we have no certain information. 
 
 So long as the Jews had no effective and universal doc- 
 trine of immortality, the divine judgment was necessarily 
 conceived of as confined to the earth. Daniel, the Sibyl, 
 the original Enoch, and the Psalms of Solomon picture the 
 future in a vague way as the destruction or subjugation 
 of foreign nations and the establishment of Israel in per- 
 petual peace and prosperity through the protecting presence 
 of God. The judgment ushers in only a change of earthly 
 relations ; there is a resurrection, but the abode of the
 
 ESCHATOLOGY. 401 
 
 blessed people is still the earth, though the earth trans- 
 figured (see Isa. Ixv. 17; Enoch xc. 33 ; cf. 2 Pet. iii. 13). 
 There appears to be no material advance in the ethical 
 representation in the Enoch-Parables ; the antithesis is in 
 form a general one, between the just and the evil, but the 
 evil are the enemies of Israel, and Israel's new place of 
 abode is the earth (xlv. 5). Throughout the book of Enoch 
 (x. liv.) judgment is passed on evil angels as well as on 
 evil men. It is apparently in the Parables that the belief 
 in immortality first shows itself in connection with the 
 judgment ; the just enjoy everlasting life (xxxvii., Iviii.) ; sin- 
 ners dwell in endless shame (xlvi. 6). Here is the germ 
 of a new signification of the expressions, " age to come " and 
 "kingdom of God," or "kingdom of heaven." The age to 
 come is essentially the era of social regeneration, ushered 
 in by the God-appointed deliverer, to endure forever, and 
 this is the kingdom of God or of heaven. It was origi- 
 nally the happy life of the chosen of God on the earth ; the 
 general effect of the introduction of the full idea of im- 
 mortality was to transfer it to heaven, and to make the 
 judgment a formal winding -up of all earthly affairs, with 
 discontinuance of the present earthly life. But a complete 
 assimilation of this new element was not effected at once; 
 the New Testament presents slightly varying views of the 
 judgment and of the future. Most of the Epistles, absorbed 
 in the present needs of the struggling Church, content 
 themselves with looking to the coming of Christ (thought 
 to be impending) for the judgment which was to introduce 
 his followers into eternal bliss. Second Peter (iii. 13) re- 
 gards this earth as the scene of the future life; and the 
 same expectation is perhaps contained in Eom. viii. 19, 
 where the outward creation, groaning in the pain of sin, is 
 represented as looking eagerly for deliverance in the revela- 
 tion of 'the sons of God, though Paul elsewhere (1 Thess. 
 
 26
 
 402 ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 iv. 17) appears to hold a different opinion. In general it 
 seems to be the larger idea of immortality that the Epis- 
 tles have in view, a state the conditions of which differ 
 from those of earthly life (so also Matt. xxii. 30). 1 The 
 Synoptics give signs of the Messiah's appearance, and de- 
 scribe a final general judgment (Matt, xxiv., xxv.). The 
 Fourth Gospel omits all particulars, presenting only the 
 moral-religious conflict of earthly life and the fact of final 
 judgment (v.) The Apocalypse has a series of partial judg- 
 ments, a preliminary imprisonment of Satan during the 
 millennial reign of the saints, and a final universal judg- 
 ment (xx.). The kingdom of God is viewed sometimes as 
 present (1 Cor. iv. 20; Eom. xiv. 17), sometimes as in the 
 future (Matt. vii. 21 ; viii. 11 ; 2 Tim. iv. 11); that is, it is a 
 constitution of things beginning now and having its culmi- 
 nation and completion in the future. " This age " (ren- 
 dered "this world'' in the English version) is the present 
 condition of things reaching up to the coming of Christ to 
 judgment (Gal. i. 4; Matt. xii. 32; Tit. ii. 12); the final 
 decision is made at the end of the age (Matt. xiii. 40). The 
 "age to come" is the period following the appearance of 
 the Messiah. According to the Jewish view it is still in 
 the future, since the Messiah has not come. In the Chris- 
 tian conception it has a double meaning; it may be his- 
 torical Christianity introduced by Jesus (Heb. vi. 5 ; Eph. 
 ii. 7, "ages to come"), or the period following the final Mes- 
 sianic judgment (Mark x. 30 ; Matt. xii. 32). In Heb. ix. 26 
 Christ is said to have been manifested and sacrificed " now 
 once at the end of the ages," and with this is contrasted 
 his second coming to judgment (verse 28). The double mean- 
 ing of the expression was natural; it signified the reign of 
 
 1 See 2 Thess. i. ; 1 Cor. i. 8 ; xv. ; 2 Cor v 10, Rom. ii 16; Phil, i 6 ; 2 
 Tim. iv. 1 ; Heb. vi. 2 ; ix. 27 ; 1 Pet. iv. 5 , v. 10 ; 2 Pet. i. 11 ; Jude 21 ; 
 1 John iv. 17. James and First Timothy have only the expectation of the 
 coming of Christ, and Galatians is occupied with salvation and eternal life.
 
 ESCHATOLOGY. 403 
 
 truth, the time of adjustment, when the wrongs of the 
 present should be righted, when the righteous should enjoy 
 the dignity that was properly theirs in a world governed 
 by a righteous God, and the wicked should pay the penalty 
 of their impious defiance and their unnatural worldly pros- 
 perity. The first fruits of that blessed time appeared under 
 the Messiah's earthly rule ; the consummation could be 
 reached only when earthly existence was over and men's 
 destinies were fixed in an endless existence beyond the 
 grave. The first phase was introductory to the second; 
 for the individual and for the nation or Church the future 
 blessedness was the continuation and completion of the 
 earthly peace, a conception that could not assume per- 
 fect shape till immortality, heaven, and hell had become 
 familiar ideas. 
 
 The Church received the doctrine of judgment from Juda- 
 ism, and introduced the additions mentioned above with- 
 out always discarding Jewish local views, which should 
 have been set aside by the spirit of Christianity. This is 
 true of the old belief that the Jewish nation should be 
 permanently established in political independence in its 
 own land. Such in fact is the declaration of the prophets 
 (Ezek. xxxvii. 25 and many other passages). Christianity 
 in general substituted the Church for the nation, and in- 
 terpreted the prophetic promises as signifying the conver- 
 sion of the Jews to faith in Jesus, 1 an interpretation which 
 is exegetically unsound, but, if held, completely sets aside 
 the expectation of political permanence. In spite of this 
 there have always been Christian circles which held after 
 
 1 Paul does not entirely escape confusion of thought on this point. After 
 making an argument (Rom. iv. , ix. 7, 8 ; x.) from the Old Testament to show 
 that the promises were not to the bodily descendants of Abraham but to all who 
 had like faith with him, he cites similar passages (Rom. xi. 25, 26) to prove 
 that the bodily, national Israel shall all be saved. His exegesis is controlled 
 at one time by his religious-dogmatic feeling, at another by his patriotism.
 
 404 ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 the dispersion of the Jews to their restoration to Palestine 
 as part of the final divine settlement of earthly affairs. 
 
 5. The formulation of the doctrines of immortality and judg- 
 ment was accompanied by the reconstruction of the theory of 
 the future life. The old Hebrew idea of Sheol as the color- 
 less abode of all the dead gradually gave way to the repre- 
 sentation of a place of happiness for the righteous and a 
 place of punishment for the wicked. The growing sense 
 of ethical individuality demanded the future meting out of 
 proper reward to earthly moral-religious character, and the 
 details of existence beyond the grave were gradually worked 
 out. The Egyptians had a well-developed system of re- 
 wards and punishments in the underworld, but the idea 
 remained strange to the Semites. The conception' of " hell " 
 is not found in the Old Testament ; 1 there is no local 
 distinction in Sheol between good and bad, 2 no apparatus 
 of reward and punishment. The reward of the righteous 
 is long life on earth (Prov. iii. 16); the punishment of the 
 wicked is premature death (Prov. x. 27). The first departure 
 from the old conception of the future is found in the book 
 of Daniel (xii. 2) in connection with the idea of resurrec- 
 tion ; of those Israelites who are raised to life, it is said, 
 some will be happy and some wretched. Enoch similarly 
 describes the punishment of bad Israelites (xxvii. 2 ; xc. 26) 
 and of evil angels (x. 6, 14 ; xc. 24, 25 ; liv.) at the judgment. 
 In the Parables (liv., lvi.>, the punishment is not confined 
 to Jews, but falls on all wicked men. In the early days of 
 the Maccabean struggle it was only Israelites who were 
 included in the scheme of resurrection ; later, it was ex- 
 tended to include all men. In Enoch there is an abyss (x.) 
 
 1 Abaddon, "destruction" (Job xxvi. 6 j xxviii 22 , Prov. xv. 11) is sim- 
 ply a synonym of Sheol. 
 
 2 In such passages as Ezek. xxxi. 18; Isa. xiv. 9, the point is the over- 
 throw of mighty and insolent enemies of Israel.
 
 ESCHATOLOGY. 405 
 
 or valley (liv.) of fire prepared for the disobedient angels ; 
 so in Matt. viii. 29, the demons look forward to a time 
 when their torment is to begin. In the Parables (liv., Ivi.), 
 human sinners (that is, enemies of Israel) are cast into the 
 valley of fire. 
 
 How did the Jews reach the practical conception of re- 
 wards and punishments after death ? Were they driven to 
 it by moral-religious feeling, by their sense of the in- 
 equalities and injustices of this life ? In that case we 
 should expect to find hints of the idea in such books as 
 Psalms and Proverbs ; but there are no such hints. On 
 the other hand, its first affirmation in the existing literature 
 occurs in connection with a doctrine which we have seen 
 reason to believe was developed under Persian influence, 
 and in Enoch it stands in close relation with the demon- 
 ology. Are we to see the influence of Persian thought here 
 also ? The data hardly warrant an answer to this ques- 
 tion : we know too little of the Persian dogma of that time. 
 Nor can we look to Egypt. The idea seems not to have 
 arisen in the Jewish colony in Egypt, nor is there great 
 resemblance between the Jewish and the Egyptian schemes. 
 The details in Enoch, such as the valley and the fire and 
 the chains, may have been suggested by the Old Testament 
 or by the ordinary imagination. Of the main idea we can 
 only say that the Jewish moral consciousness was prepared 
 for it and that it arose out of the conditions of the time. 
 It was familiar to the Egyptians and riot unknown to the 
 Greeks. Once suggested to the Jews, it would supply what 
 they had probably been conscious of needing. Attached to 
 the doctrine of resurrection it would accord with funda- 
 mental Israelitish beliefs. Confined at first to members of 
 the chosen people, it would come, by the growth of ethical 
 feeling, to embrace other nations. 
 
 Christianity took the conception from Judaism. The rep-
 
 406 ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 reservation of future punishment in the New Testament is 
 substantially the same as that of Enoch. The specific term 
 for hell is Gehenna (Matt. v. 22 ; Jas. iii. 6), the " valley of 
 Hinnom," the spot consecrated to the old Moloch-worship 
 (2 Kings xxiii. 10 : Isa. xxx. 33 ; Ixvi. 24), an abominable 
 place of filth which became the symbol of future torment. 
 Elsewhere " Hades " (in Greek, the dwelling-place of all the 
 dead) is used in very much the same sense (Matt. xi. 23 ; 
 Luke xvi. 23 ; Eev. xx. 13, 14). When specific terms had 
 been devised for the abode of happiness, the general Greek 
 term was applied to the other division of the life beyond. 1 
 It was conceived of in general as a subterranean place 
 of torment. The tormenters, however, are apparently not 
 Satan and the demons, who are themselves tormented, but 
 the good angels appointed by God to that office (Enoch liii. 
 liv. ; Kev. xx. 10). It seems to be intimated by Paul that 
 the saints, the believers in Jesus, are to take part in the 
 final judgment of wicked men and disobedient angels (1 Cor. 
 vi. 2, 3) ; but it is not said in what relation they are after- 
 ward to stand to the lost. In the parable of the rich man 
 and Lazarus (Luke xvi. 19-31) it is declared that bodily 
 communication between the denizens of Paradise and those 
 of Hades is impossible, there being a great gulf between 
 them (verse 26) ; yet the sufferer appeals to Abraham, whom 
 
 1 Except in the Synoptics and the Apocalypse, almost nothing is said 
 of hell in the New Testament. James (iii. 6), looking on it as the locus 
 and representative of all evil, speaks of its setting the tongue on fire ; Jude 
 (6, 13) and Second Peter (ii. 4, 17) have mention of the bonds in which 
 the disobedient angels .are held in darkness unto judgment (Second Peter 
 calls the place of punishment Tartarus) and of the blackness of darkness 
 reserved for certain false teachers. Elsewhere only general expressions, 
 such as " destruction " and " condemnation of the devil," are employed. 
 This reticence may be explained in part from the practical aim of the Epis- 
 tles, which are mostly occupied in meeting actual emergencies and build- 
 ing up the life of the Church ; it may also be true that the conception of 
 the place of punishment became distincter and more familiar after Paul's 
 time.
 
 ESCHATOLOGY. 407 
 
 he supposes to be invested with authority, and begs him to 
 send Lazarus on a mission of mercy. 1 
 
 As to the duration of future punishment, the general doc- 
 trine of the New Testament is that it is to be without end, 
 it is to endure as long as the blessed life of the righteous 
 
 o o 
 
 (Matt. xxv. 46 ; Rev. xx. 10, 15 ; xxi. 4, 8, 27; xxii. 5, 11, 
 15). Such is the representation of Paul in First Corinth- 
 ians. The abolition of death (1 Cor. xv. 26, 54) is not the 
 abolition of the suffering of the wicked, but, as is clear from 
 Eev. xxi. 14 and 2 Tim. i. 10, the annulment of all suffer- 
 ing for the righteous and the beginning of the endless tor- 
 ment of the unrighteous. It is doubtful how we are to 
 understand the declaration in Colossians (i. 20), that it was 
 God's purpose to reconcile to himself through Christ all 
 things on earth and in the heavens. From a comparison 
 of other statements in the Epistle (as ii. 15, where Christ 
 triumphs over the principalities and the powers, and iii. 4, 
 where at the manifestation of Christ only the saints are to 
 be manifested with him in glory), we might rather conclude 
 that the writer's intention is to ascribe all reconciliation to 
 Christ, but not to affirm such a pleroma or fulness in Christ 
 or such a summing up of things (Eph. i. 10, Anakepha- 
 laiosis) as would exclude that retribution for evil doing 
 which everywhere else in the New Testament is assumed 
 to be an essential part of the divine government of the uni- 
 verse. If, however, we are to see here the conception of a 
 final reconciliation between God and his creatures, a blot- 
 ting out of evil in the sense that it shall be transformed 
 into good, a complete harmonizing of the universe so that 
 neither angel nor man shall be found to set himself against 
 the divine ethical order, then we must hold this view to 
 spring out of a philosophical thought which does not find 
 
 1 This, however, may be merely a part of the framework of the parable, in- 
 troduced simply to bring out the final character of the doom of the departed.
 
 408 ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 support elsewhere in the New Testament, and which did 
 not afterward meet with wide approbation in the Church. 
 
 So soon as the idea of a future life of compensation 
 and happiness for the good was established, the question 
 would arise in men's minds where the abode of the right- 
 eous should be. This subject has been mentioned above 
 from time to time. The points may be summed up briefly. 
 There was not unnaturally fluctuation of opinion. The 
 history of the future had to be constructed from such 
 data as w r ere at hand, and the data were indefinite and 
 to some extent mutually contradictory. The prophets of 
 course thought of Jerusalem as the centre of the coming 
 kingdom of bliss (Isa. Ixvi.), and this continued to be the 
 national Jewish view. A new Jerusalem, as the capital of 
 the Messianic kingdom, is found in the book of Enoch (xc. 
 29) ; in the New Testament this representation is given in 
 the Apocalypse (xxi., xxii.). The earth, according to this 
 Jewish-Christian conception, was to be the home of the 
 saved, but the earth reconstructed, purified from all evil, 
 new heavens and a new earth (2 Pet. iii. 13 ; after Isa. 
 Ixv. 17 ; Ixvi. 22), the abode of righteousness. It was the 
 conviction that man's life is tied to this earth, modified 
 by the feeling that a regeneration of the sin-stricken exter- 
 nal world was essential (so Paul in Eom. viii. 18-22). It 
 is doubtful whether the earthly Paradise, the reconstructed 
 Eden of Genesis, was regarded in the New Testament times 
 as the future abode of the righteous. Such an opinion would 
 be not unnatural ; it would be a return to the primitive 
 blessedness from which man's transgression had expelled 
 him. The history of the world would then become the rec- 
 ord of the divine movement for the subjugation of the pow- 
 ers of evil which had intruded themselves into the first 
 happy creation of God. There is a hint of such a view in 
 the Enoch-Parables (Ixi. 12), where the "garden of life" is
 
 ESCHATOLOGY. 409 
 
 the dwelling-place of the chosen. The same spot under the 
 name of the " garden of justice " is described hi an earlier 
 portion of the book (xxxii.), but without intimation that it 
 was assigned to the chosen as their habitation. The term 
 " paradise " 1 is indeed employed several times in the New 
 Testament to designate the future dwelling-place of the 
 righteous, but the locality which it is intended to mark is 
 left uncertain. In the Apocalypse (ii. 7) it is simply men- 
 tioned as the reward of those who overcome ; in the Third 
 Gospel (xxiii. 43) it is the abode into which the righteous 
 enter immediately after death (" To-day," says Jesus to the 
 malefactor, " shalt thou be with me in Paradise ") ; Paul, with 
 somewhat more definiteness, seems to identify Paradise with 
 the third heaven (2 Cor. xii. 2-4). It may be added that 
 the expression " Abraham's bosom " 2 (Luke xvi. 22), while 
 it signifies a state of content and happiness, is not definite 
 as to locality. There is a gulf between the abode of the 
 saved and that of the lost, but whether on earth or in 
 Sheol or in some celestial region is not said. But Chris- 
 tian opinion moved toward the hope of a future dwelling 
 with Christ in some bright celestial place. " We," says Paul, 
 "shall be caught up in the clouds to meet the Lord in the 
 air, and so shall we ever be with the Lord" (1 Thess. iv. 
 17). " Rejoice and be exceeding glad," we read in the Ser- 
 
 1 The word (r-apdHtitros) is generally held to be of Persian origin (ety- 
 mology uncertain), the original sense being "park" (Xen. Anab. i. 2, 7, 
 etc.) ; so it is employed in the Hebrew Old Testament (pardes, only in very 
 late books, Neh. ii. 8 ; Eccl. ii. 5 ; Cant. iv. 13). In the Septuagiut it is the 
 rendering of the "garden" of Eden (Gen. ii. 15) ; thence it easily passed to 
 represent the future abode of the righteous. See Smith, " Dictionary of the 
 Bible," art. Paradise ; Friedrich Delitzsch, " Wo lag das Paradies ? " Weber, 
 " System," 75. 
 
 2 The expression is derived from the Roman habit of reclining at table. 
 The existence of the saved is pictured as a feast, where Abraham, the father 
 of the Jewish nation, is head and master, and the righteous man, as hon- 
 ored guest, reclines with his head on the bosom of the patriarch (cf. Luke 
 xiii. 29).
 
 410 ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 mon on the Mount (Matt. v. 12), " for great is your reward 
 in heaven." " When Christ/' says one epistle, " who is now 
 seated on the right hand of God, shall be manifested, then 
 believers shall with him be manifested in glory" (Col. iii. 
 1-4). The person of Christ formed the centre of the Chris- 
 tian picture of the future ; happiness was the being with 
 him. But beyond the feeling that there was to be no suf- 
 fering and no anxiety, the details of the blessed life are 
 not given. The New Testament writers are concerned with 
 practical affairs. All that the Church needed was the sup- 
 port and the stimulus of the transcendent hope of coming 
 blessedness. 
 
 The question of the condition of men between death and 
 the final judgment is not fully treated in the pre-Christian 
 literature or in the New Testament. The original Enoch 
 (xxii.) divides the intermediate abode of souls into several 1 
 compartments. One is for the righteous who (like Abel) 
 suffered injustice on earth, another for sinners who were 
 not punished on earth, another for sinners who were pun- 
 ished on earth, their fate after death being thereby miti- 
 gated. The place is described indefinitely as being " in the 
 west," but is apparently in the underworld. The New Tes- 
 tament statements or allusions present a simpler scheme. 
 Paul, at a time when he expected to witness before death 
 the coming of Christ (1 Cor. xv. 51, 52), naturally thought 
 of passing from earth directly into the presence of the Lord 
 (2 Cor. v. 4-8) ; at a later period (Phil. i. 21-23) he speaks 
 of death as equivalent to union with Christ. 2 The Epistle 
 to the Hebrews (xii. 23) regards the spirits of the just as 
 already made perfect ; and in the Apocalypse (vi. 9-11) the 
 souls of the martyrs (like the soul of Abel in Enoch) cry 
 
 1 The text says " four,'' but only three can be clearly made out. The 
 number is not important ; the fact of punishment and division is clear. 
 
 2 Yet in this Epistle also (i 6, 10: iii 20) he seems to expect the parou- 
 sia in that generation.
 
 ESCHATOLOGY. 411 
 
 for vengeance on their slayers. In the Lazarus-parable the 
 righteous man and the sinner pass immediately to their re- 
 wards, and so the thief on the cross. The reasonable infer- 
 ence is that in the main teaching of the New Testament 
 earthly death ushers men immediately into a new life and 
 fixes their destinies forever for happiness or misery. Such 
 nlso is the view in Daniel (xii.) and in Enoch (xxii., cii., 
 ciii. ; cf. Wisd. of Sol. iii. 10, 19 ; v.). Neither annihilation 
 nor future probation can be affirmed to belong to the pre- 
 vailing doctrine of the first century. Annihilation was a 
 conception foreign to Jewish thought. It does not appear 
 in Ecclesiastes, the most sceptical of pre-Christian Jewish 
 writings ; it is found nowhere in the New Testament. The 
 terms " destruction " and " death," so often used to describe 
 the future state of the wicked, are taken from the Old Testa- 
 ment, and are obviously intended to express not the annul- 
 ment of existence but the cessation of happy activity. Good 
 and bad must continue to live after bodily death, and con- 
 tinuing to live, must accept the conditions which the gov- 
 ernment of a just God imposes. Nor is there any trace in 
 pre-Christian Jewish literature or (with one exception) in 
 the New Testament of a disciplinary and restorative force 
 iii future suffering, or of the conception of a moral proba- 
 tion continued after death. The prevailing tone of the Jew- 
 ish thought on this point is summed up in the word of the 
 New Testament Apocalypse (Eev. xxii. 11) : "He that is un- 
 righteous, let him be unrighteous still, and he that is holy, 
 let him be holy still." Such is the representation in the 
 parable of the rich man and Lazarus (Luke xvi.), there is 
 an impassable gulf between the good and the bad. The only 
 New Testament passage which seems to teach the possibility 
 of repentance and salvation after death is the obscure para- 
 graph in the First Epistle of Peter (iii. 18-20 ; iv. 6), where 
 Christ is said to have preached, after his death, in the spirit,
 
 412 ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 to the spirits in prison ; that is, as it seems, to those men 
 who, disobedient to the divine command in the days of Noah, 
 were now in bonds in the underworld. The intention of the 
 writer of the Epistle seems to be to represent Christ as 
 preaching the Gospel to these imprisoned spirits that the 
 possibility of believing and being saved might be offered 
 them (a similar view is_ found in the Talmud). But this 
 passage, if that be its meaning, stands alone ; everywhere 
 else death seals man's fate. The decisive impetus to preach- 
 ing came from the conviction that what was to be done for 
 men must be done in this life. The most dreadful summing 
 up of destiny is found in the words, " Ye shall die in your 
 sins" (John viii. 24). l 
 
 The idea of moral probation, which runs throughout the 
 Hebrew and Christian Scriptures, being indeed at the bot- 
 tom of every scheme of life, is modified or controlled by that 
 conception of a final judgment which passed over from Juda- 
 ism into Christianity. The antithesis is distinctly stated in 
 Acts xvii. 30, 31 : "God commands all men to repent, inas- 
 much as he has appointed a day in which he will judge the 
 world." There is nothing in man's view of his own nature 
 that should lead him to regard death as putting a quietus 
 on free moral development. Other nations had doctrines of 
 continuous growth and possibility of moral revolution and 
 regeneration in the life beyond ; but the Jewish monarchical 
 scheme of an organized kingdom with God as king, follow- 
 ing the analogy of human governments, assumed a final judi- 
 cial sentence passed on enemies with permanent security for 
 citizens of the kingdom. It was an external, mechanical 
 conception of human life. The soul of man, with its cease- 
 less ethical struggle, was lost sight of in the picture (grand 
 
 1 On the later Jewish view of the condition of men after death see Weber, 
 " System," cap. xxi. The Talmudic doctrine of purgatorial suffering in hell 
 seems to have arisen after the first century.
 
 ESCHATOLOGY. 413 
 
 in itself) of a universe forced into submission, to an all- 
 powerful ruler. 
 
 Thus Christian thought, following on a long course of 
 Jewish growth, reached the conception of a highly organ- 
 ized kingdom of God beginning on earth and completed in 
 heaven. This conception, resting on an ethical basis (though 
 it also contained non ethical elements), satisfied both the 
 desire for permanent happiness and the demand for moral 
 perfection ; it included present holiness and future blessed- 
 ness. For its content it had drawn on all the available 
 resources of the Western world. It took from Jewish and 
 Persian theology and eschatology and from Greek ethical 
 philosophy what it could assimilate, and rejected the rest. 
 Its guide was the Jewish religious instinct enlightened and 
 broadened by contact with the other great religious systems 
 of the time and the region. It was the Israelitish nation 
 which by all its endowments and training was best fitted 
 to undertake the organization of a religion for the world. 
 But the Jews could not alone have provided all that was 
 required, and but for the social unity created by the Greek 
 and Eoman empires would neither have felt the need of 
 foreign help nor been in position to profit by it. Paul, the 
 creative mind of the first great organizing period of Chris- 
 tianity, represents Jewish theology constrained and impelled 
 by non-Jewish surroundings. 
 
 The Jewish scheme of national-political supremacy was 
 soon cast away by the disciples of Jesus, and in its place 
 was substituted the hope of the future triumph of the 
 Church. This was the essence of Christian eschatology, and 
 it was this that furnished the main motive power of Chris- 
 tian effort. The New Testament throughout holds up the 
 rewards of the future as the incentive to present holiness. 
 The eschatology necessarily shaped itself out of the ideas 
 of the time, and the task of the creators of Christianity
 
 414 ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 was to select these so wisely, with such combined liberality 
 and sobriety, that the result should offer the world of that 
 time just what it needed for support and inspiration in the 
 hard struggle of life. How well they chose, time has shown. 
 But for this distinct and reasonable hope of the future, it 
 may safely be said, Christianity would not have imposed 
 itself on the world ; it would have shared the fate of Greek 
 ethical systems, which were philosophically lofty but lack- 
 ing in fulness of life. 
 
 On the other hand, it is evident that the Jewish-Christian 
 conception of the kingdom of God, though encumbered with 
 mechanical, soteriological, and eschatological elements, re- 
 posed on an ethically practical and strenuous scheme of the 
 present earthly life. Prophets and apostles are at one in 
 holding up a high moral standard and insisting that men 
 are to suffer or enjoy the consequences of their earthly deeds. 
 No man, they say, can do wrong with impunity. The pun- 
 ishment of evil they refer, it is true, not to a divinely con- 
 stituted course of nature, but to a specific divine decree : 
 in any case it is just and inevitable. No one can enter the 
 kingdom of G<5d except by conforming himself to the eth- 
 ically perfect divine will ; the new man is created in holi- 
 ness ; the essence of the divine kingdom is righteousness ; 
 whatever a man sows, that he shall reap, such is the bur- 
 den of all utterances of Old Testament and New Testament. 
 This has remained a permanent element of Christianity. The- 
 ories of atonement, of faith and works, of heaven and hell, 
 have changed from time to time ; the ethical conception of 
 life has stood fast. Apart from its framework of dogmatic 
 apparatus Christianity offered the world of the first century 
 a simple working theory of God and man, God just and 
 loving, man free and responsible. By its dogma it was at- 
 tractive and effective ; on its ethical-religious sicle it was 
 worthy of its triumph.
 
 CHAPTEK VIII. 
 
 RELATION OF JESUS TO CHRISTIANITY. 
 
 WE have thus endeavored to trace the process by which 
 Judaism, the religion of a nation, was transformed 
 into Christianity, a religion for the world. We have fol- 
 lowed the progress . of the Israelitish faith in its efforts to 
 formulate ideas, to organize life, to rise to greater spirit- 
 uality, to reach the breadth which the advancing thought 
 of the people demanded. At a certain point in its career 
 a new faith suddenly sprang into existence, which from a 
 feeble and undefined beginning soon assumed an assured 
 and vigorous form. It first showed itself as a new con- 
 ception of that kingdom of God which in one shape and 
 another had been the dream of the pious of Israel for 
 many centuries. This new conception was a startling one. 
 Whereas prophets, psalmists, and apocalyptists had thought 
 of the ultimate earthly state of blessedness as a moral and 
 political reconstruction of the nation, political indepen- 
 dence and perfection of national obedience to the Law, 
 Jesus made the essence of the new life to be the purity 
 of the individual soul. The deliverer, who had always been 
 conceived of as a temporal king, he held to be a teacher 
 sent from God to show men the spirit of the divine law. 
 While he said nothing of an abrogation of the Mosaic law 
 or of the equality of all nations in the sight of God, he 
 announced principles which by giving paramount impor- 
 tance to the spiritual tended to depress the ceremonial, to
 
 416 RELATION OF JESUS TO CHRISTIANITY. 
 
 abolish outward distinctions, and to lead to the conclusion 
 that all men stood in the same relation to God. His disci- 
 ples, at first only dimly apprehending his spirit, but looking 
 after his death for his reappearance as the divinely promised 
 deliverer of Israel, gradually formed themselves into a sep- 
 arate society, which speedily became a church. Into the 
 new organization came Gentiles, men who stood outside 
 the tradition of Jewish national custom, and valued in Chris- 
 tianity other than its purely Jewish ideas, and in their 
 interests a further reconstruction became desirable. This 
 was effected mainly by the Apostle Paul, under whose lead 
 a large section of the Church threw off circumcision, the 
 badge of Jewish nationality, dispensed in general with Jew- 
 ish ceremonial, and made the person of Jesus Christ the 
 ground of salvation and the centre of the religious life. The 
 expectation of his speedy reappearance, becoming by degrees 
 more composed, took its place as part of the Christian hope ; 
 preparation for heaven was held to consist in religious-ethical 
 faithfulness. He came to be thought of as the eternal Son 
 of God, and then, under the influence of Greek philosophy, 
 as the eternal Word, the reason, utterance, and agent of God 
 in the physical and spiritual creation and maintenance of 
 the world. In process of time the Church passed entirely 
 out of the hands of the Jew r s into the hands of the Gentiles, 
 entered the circle of Roman and western European thought, 
 and submitted to those changes which were entailed by the 
 progress of civilization. What is the relation of Jesus of 
 Nazareth to this vast movement of human thought ? This 
 question has been touched on in the preceding pages, but 
 we may here attempt, at the risk of some repetition, to an- 
 swer it more directly and fully. 
 
 1. In the first place, it seems evident that Jesus announced 
 those germinal principles of which the succeeding history of 
 Christianity is only a development. The records of his teach-
 
 RELATION OF JESUS TO CHRISTIANITY. 417 
 
 ing leave much to be desired. His words are not always cor- 
 rectly reported, and there are not a few interpolations from 
 later tradition ; nevertheless, it seems possible to gather from 
 the New Testament a fairly faithful idea of the spirit of his 
 instruction. 
 
 "We have recognized in the pre-Christian Jewish literature 
 the progress which the Jewish mind was making in ethical 
 breadth and spirituality. Various thinkers had reached very 
 high conceptions of the principles of moral conduct and of 
 the nature of religion (Proverbs, Psalms, Wisdom of Solo- 
 mon, Wisdom of the Son of Sirach, Hillel). There was an 
 earnest effort to grasp spirituality ; and this must be set over 
 against the tendency of the extreme Pharisaic party to in- 
 sist on external details up to the point of forgetting sincerity 
 and spirituality. It was by no means a religiously torpid 
 age ; on the contrary, there is reason to believe that there 
 was a well-defined feeling of discontent in the best minds, 
 a desire for something purer and higher than had yet been 
 attained. 
 
 It was Jesus of Nazareth who grasped the situation as no 
 one else did, and in response to the demand of the time 
 came forward with principles which satisfied men's highest 
 moral and religious instincts. He faced at once the burning 
 questions of the day : What is the kingdom of God ? What 
 is salvation ? Ignoring the ecclesiastical and ritualistic ma- 
 chinery of the Jews, he declared that salvation was trust in 
 God and obedience to him. Obedience he defined to be im- 
 itation of the divine perfection, which he summed up in the 
 two qualities of justice and love, or in love alone, which in- 
 cludes justice. Sincerity he assumed as an element of love, 
 and he felt himself obliged, as has been the case with all 
 moral teachers, to denounce the insincerity of the religious 
 leaders and practices of the times. Trust in God he held 
 to be filial confidence in the divine goodness and wisdom, 
 
 27
 
 418 RELATION OF JESUS TO CHRISTIANITY. 
 
 hearty sympathy and co-operation with the divine Father in 
 thought, feeling, word, and deed. In fine, it was oneness 
 with God in spirit which he announced as the controlling 
 principle of the religious life. It was the profound con- 
 viction that this was the essence of salvation which en- 
 abled him to go his way undisturbed by current practices 
 and ideas. Whatever his attitude toward the transitory 
 opinions of his time and people, he never relaxed his hold 
 on this fundamental and formative principle, a principle 
 which gave shape to all succeeding phases of Christianity. 
 It may be that he sympathized with a half -Essen ian quiet- 
 ism (Matt, v.) ; but this local coloring soon vanished in the 
 process of development, and the great principle remained. 
 Perhaps his intention was to restrict his direct teaching to 
 the Jews as the chosen people of God (Matt. x. 5, 6) ; but 
 this was a limitation \vhich could not survive in the pres- 
 ence of the declaration that God's love was bestowed equally 
 on just and unjust (Matt. v. 45). His conception of the 
 future of the kingdom of God may have included some of 
 the outward details of the popular opinion. Something that 
 he said may have been understood by his disciples as mean- 
 ing that he himself would return to earth to establish the 
 kingdom forever (2 Thess. i. 7, 8 ; but against this there is 
 the apparent hopelessness of the two disciples in Luke xxiv. 
 17, 21). But this expectation, so long and so anxiously held 
 by -the Church, did not modify the essential life of Chris- 
 tianity, serving rather only to quicken its faithfulness and 
 spirit of obedience. 
 
 On the other hand, the silence of Jesus is no less striking 
 than his utterances. It is not indeed to be considered im- 
 portant that he added nothing to the existing idea of immor- 
 tality. The doctrine of the future life was already clearly 
 formulated, continued existence, with rewards and punish- 
 ments corresponding to earthly moral character. The asser-
 
 RELATION OF JESUS TO CHRISTIANITY. 419 
 
 tion by a comparatively late writer (2 Tim. i. 1 0) that Christ 
 Jesus " brought life and incorruption [or immortality] to light 
 through the gospel," refers not to the general doctrine of the 
 continued existence of all men, but to the promise of a future 
 life of blessedness for believers in Jesus. In opposing the 
 Sadducean denial of the resurrection of the body Jesus had 
 the concurrence of the scribes (Mark xii. 28) ; so Paul (ac- 
 cording to the account in Acts xxiii. 6-8) on a critical occa- 
 sion appealed to the Pharisees as the representatives of this 
 doctrine. On this point the Church coincided with the Syna- 
 gogue, and the teaching of Jesus was in explicit agreement 
 with both. His silence in respect to himself is, however, 
 noticeable. Here we have to rely almost wholly on the 
 Synoptics and the Epistle of James, the Fourth Gospel being 
 so deeply colored by later ideas that it must be used with 
 great caution as a portraiture of the Master. The state- 
 ments of the Synoptics are not altogether harmonious among 
 themselves, and must be judged by comparison of one with 
 another and by the teachings of the succeeding history. 
 
 In the first place, it appears probable that Jesus did not 
 represent himself as a sacrifice for sin. There can be little 
 doubt that he held in a general way the doctrine of the 
 necessity of vicarious atonement. It was part of the cur- 
 rent opinion ; and .he nowhere controverts it, as we may 
 suppose he would certainly have done if he had thought 
 the doctrine wrong. It was the teaching of the Law , and 
 he accepted the Law as a divinely appointed rule of life. 
 He both himself observed its ritual requirements and ad- 
 vised others so to do (Mark i. 44 ; xiv. 12-16). In thus 
 accepting the sacrifices for sin prescribed by the Law, he 
 virtually declared that no other sacrifice was needed. Paul, 
 in proclaiming Jesus to be men's propitiation and redemp- 
 tion (Gal. iii. 13 ; 1 Cor. i. 30 ; Rom. iv. 25), seems distinctly 
 to set aside the Mosaic scheme of sacrifice (Gal. iii. 13 ; iv.
 
 420 KELATION OF JESUS TO CHRISTIANITY. 
 
 10, 11 ; 1 Cor. i. 23 ; Rom. iii. 19-31 ; v. 12-21), though his 
 polemic is specially directed against circumcision. The Epis- 
 tle to the Hebrews makes a detailed argument to show that 
 the sacrifices of the Law were in themselves impotent and 
 were formally abrogated by the death of Christ ; but no 
 such statements are ascribed to Jesus either in the Synop- 
 tics or in the Fourth Gospel. In Mark (vi 33, 34, 45) he 
 predicts his death and declares that he came to give his 
 life as a ransom for many. This last expression, isolated 
 as it is, cannot in the face of his other teaching be taken 
 to mean that his death was a substitute for the legal offer- 
 ings. Vicarious he might have called it in the sense in 
 which the term is used in Tsa. liii., or as the high-priest 
 Caiaphas is represented (John xi. 50) as employing it in 
 reference to Jesus himself ; the rather that in the connec- 
 tion in Mark (and so in Matt. xx. 28), the giving of his life 
 as ransom is mentioned along with the ministering which it 
 is Jesus' special purpose to describe as a part of the humil- 
 ity that is characteristic of the new kingdom of God. If 
 the ransoming is not of the nature of ministering (which 
 is not technically and legally a sacrifice), it is probably an 
 expression of later tradition. The expression used by Jesus 
 at the passover-meal, "This is my blood of the covenant, 
 which is shed for many" (Mark xiv. 24), may be under- 
 stood in a similar sense ; or it may be that the original form 
 of the saying was less decided, and that tradition has im- 
 pressed on it the tone of a later time. Certainly the con- 
 ception of atonement for sin effected through his blood does 
 not accord with the tone of the Sermon on the Mount or 
 with that of his general teaching as given in the Synop- 
 tical Gospels. There it is individual conduct that deter- 
 mines men's destiny. Nor can it be said that conduct is 
 in these passages represented as the outcome of spiritual 
 power implanted in man in consequence of his atoning
 
 RELATION OF JESUS TO CHRISTIANITY. 421 
 
 death ; the silence of the Gospels on this point (omitting 
 the two passages above quoted) makes such a view practi- 
 cally impossible. With more reason it might be supposed 
 that he purposely withheld instruction concerning his death 
 till the last hour approached, thinking his disciples unfitted 
 earlier for such teaching, or that he himself did not before 
 these last days become convinced of the sacrificial nature 
 of his death. But it would be difficult to reconcile the first 
 of these suppositions with his distinct statement that who- 
 ever did the will of God (Mark iii. 35) was nearest to him 
 in soul ; and both suppositions are rendered improbable by 
 the attitude of the disciples just after his death. 
 
 Still more decidedly alien to his teaching is the dogma 
 that justification before the divine tribunal was effected by 
 his righteousness imputed to the believer. In the Synop- 
 tics faith in Jesus is simply confidence in his ability to 
 cure bodily ailment, or belief that he is the Messiah ; in 
 some cases the faith is vicarious (Mark ii. 5 ; v. 36). On 
 the other hand, Jesus makes man's own righteousness the 
 human condition of salvation, the divine ground being God's 
 willingness to forgive (Matt. vi. J4). His scheme of life as 
 given in his reported teaching contemplates no intermediary 
 between God and the individual soul. He seems, as has 
 already been remarked, to have accepted the national sys- 
 tem of sacrifice ; but from his utterances as they have been 
 handed down we should infer that he attached little impor- 
 tance to it. Apparently he looked on it as a time honored 
 framework of popular religious life, but the essential thing 
 in his eyes was ethical union with God. He would not 
 directly combat the existing system ; he would quietly sub- 
 stitute for it a spiritual principle, not vicarious suffering 
 or vicarious goodness, but personal obedience. Other great 
 Jewish moral teachers of the time did not fail, along with 
 their insistence on ethical purity, to hold up the Law as the
 
 422 KELATION OF JESUS TO CHRISTIANITY. 
 
 essence of the religious life. Jesus substantially put aside 
 all systems and apparatus and made his appeal simply to 
 the individual conscience. 
 
 Did Jesus regard himself as a divine person or as in any 
 way lifted above the sphere of humanity ? It may fairly 
 be said that the general impression left on us by the por- 
 traiture of him in the Synoptics is that he lived and acted 
 as other men ; that nothing was further from his mind 
 than the desire to be looked on as a superhuman being. In 
 his appeals to the people, in his more familiar intercourse 
 with his disciples, in his arguments with his opponents, in 
 his hours of prayer and of struggle he thought and spoke as 
 a man. He claimed to be only a teacher of righteousness ; 
 and certainly this was the impression received by some of 
 his followers, by the two who went to Einmaus (Luke 
 xxiv. 19-21), and (if we may rely on the account in Acts) by 
 Peter himself (Acts ii. 22-24, 32-36). If he claimed mirac- 
 ulous powers, the same claim was made by many others, 
 prophets and apostles. As to the forgiveness of sins, he him- 
 self pointed out that this was no more a divine power than 
 the gift of healing (Mark v. 21-23), and it is represented as 
 belonging also to the disciples (Matt, xviii. 18 ; cf. Luke x. 
 16). The titles "Son of Man" and "Son of David" do not 
 suggest a superhuman nature, nor according to the Fourth 
 Gospel (John x. 33-36) does a claim to such a nature reside 
 in the title " Son of God." There Jesus is represented as 
 making an argument from the Old Testament (Ps. Ixxxii. 6) 
 to show that men might be so called, and (expressly dis- 
 claiming divinity) describes himself as one " whom the Father 
 consecrated and sent into the world." Nothing more than 
 this seems to be involved in the declaration (Matt. xi. 25-30) 
 that " no one knows the Son save the Father, nor does any 
 one know the Father save the Son and he to whom the Son 
 wills to reveal him " (where the believer is in this respect
 
 RELATION OF JESUS TO CHRISTIANITY. 423 
 
 equal with the Son). Other passages, in which the " Son of 
 Man " is represented as lord of the angels (Matt. xiii. 41 ; 
 xvi. 27, 28), seem to imply a power not indeed divine yet 
 more than human. This view of himself, out of harmony 
 with the utterances above mentioned, might be supposed to 
 express a later phase of his inward experience, to be a prod- 
 uct of the time when he had come to look on himself as 
 the Messiah and destined to reappear in judgment ; but as 
 his disciples do not seem to have expected such a reappear- 
 ance (Luke xxiv. ; Mark xvi. 2-5), it is probable that this 
 announcement was not made by him but expresses the idea 
 of a later time. In the same way we may understand the 
 declarations that he would be with his followers everywhere 
 and always (Matt, xviii. 20 ; xxviii. 19, 20), unless, indeed, a 
 merely spiritual presence is here intended. With such evi- 
 dence as lies before us, it seems reasonable to conclude that 
 Jesus laid no claim, in thought or in word, to other than 
 human nature and power. He was conscious of profound 
 sympathy with the divine mind ; the formality and folly of 
 the prevailing religion pressed on his soul as a heavy bur- 
 den that he felt called on to bear ; he believed himself to 
 be a prophet sent by God with a message of salvation to 
 men, whom he embraced in his deep and yearning love ; yea, 
 in the intensity of his conscious union with the divine Father 
 he knew himself to be the Son of God. But beyond this he 
 did not go. It would indeed be a noteworthy thing that a 
 Jew of that period, with the profound Jewish sentiment of 
 the unspeakable distance between God and man, should have 
 overstepped the boundary, and being in human form, have 
 equalled himself with the divine. For so remarkable a de- 
 parture from the national thought we naturally demand clear 
 evidence, and such evidence we do not find in the existing 
 records of the life of Jesus. 
 
 2. Such was his teaching. What were the fortunes of
 
 424 RELATION OF JESUS TO CHRISTIANITY 
 
 the doctrine that he cast forth as seed into the world? 
 That he made a profound impression on his disciples is 
 evident from the fact that after his death his name was 
 the bond of union and basis of organization for them. That 
 his teaching contained a true response to the demands of 
 the age is clear from the religious revolution which was 
 effected by his followers. But was all his teaching accepted 
 by his disciples, or only a part of it ? and was his doctrine 
 alone the potent element in the Christianity that subdued 
 the Roman empire, or did it call to its aid ideas to which 
 he was a stranger ? And if this last was the case, what 
 was his relation to the new ideas thus introduced ? 
 
 It is commonly said that the disciples just after the 
 death of Jesus were merely Jews who believed him to 
 be the Messiah. This is probably true so far as their 
 religious dogma was concerned. We may infer from the 
 opening chapters of Acts that they still practised all the 
 observances of the Law ; and Gamaliel's speech, which may 
 be regarded as embodying a reliable tradition, seems not 
 to contemplate the new movement as necessarily inimical 
 to the national faith. Jesus in fact did not announce any 
 new dogma, and there was no reason why his followers 
 should not remain Jews in religious belief. But he did 
 proclaim and illustrate a new spirit in ethics and religion, 
 and it was this that was destined to overthrow Mosaism 
 in the Church. How far in the first years this spirit had 
 gained possession of the disciples, it is hard to say ; for 
 information on this point we are wholly dependent on the 
 account in Acts, which is certainly not free from the ex- 
 pansions of tradition. Yet so far as we can judge from 
 the tone of the opening chapters of Acts, there was an 
 inspiring exaltation of soul in the little company of men 
 and women who were awaiting the appearance of Jesus. 
 They had come during his lifetime to look on him as the
 
 RELATION OF JESUS TO CHRISTIANITY. 425 
 
 Messiah. This was not strange ; there were not a few Mes- 
 siahs, who had each his followers. A more noteworthy 
 thing was that they had retained their faith in him even 
 after his death. 1 Whether this was due to something which 
 they understood to be a promise of return on his part or 
 to the powerful impression made on them by his person- 
 ality, may be doubtful. It is certain that they believed 
 him to mark a turning-point in the history of Israel, the 
 redemption, perhaps in some not clearly defined way, of 
 the people from all evil. Thus his person naturally became 
 the central point of their religious faith and hope ; he 
 would sum up in himself all the promises. This seems to 
 have been the attitude of the infant Church. Its creed 
 in other respects had undergone no change. Salvation was 
 still the reward of obedience to the Law, manifested (as 
 John and Jesus had taught) by repentance and the out- 
 ward separation by baptism from that crooked generation ; 
 but there was the subtle influence of devotion to a pure 
 and lofty personality ; the memory of his consecration to 
 his spiritual ideal would leaven more and more the Church's 
 life and thought. 
 
 Thus it is not surprising that we do not find in the 
 earliest Christian records any clear signs of dogmatic re- 
 construction. The burden of the discourses and prayers 
 reported in the twelve first chapters of Acts (up to the 
 time when Paul began his active work) is simply that 
 Jesus of Nazareth, who had been put to death, was the 
 promised Christ, the prophet foretold by Moses and the 
 prophets, the servant of God sent to turn men from their 
 iniquities. And if he was all this, it was of course neces- 
 sary that men should believe on him, that is, should accept 
 
 1 This fact also, as is well known, has its counterparts in history and 
 especially in other religious movements, as, for example, Buddhism, the 
 Mahdi-form of Mohammedanism, and the Persian Babism.
 
 426 EELATION OF JESUS TO CHRISTIANITY. 
 
 him as the final teacher and deliverer. The belief early 
 established itself that he had risen from the dead, that he 
 had been received into heaven, there to dwell till the time 
 of his coming, a belief which may be regarded as a natural 
 pendant to the conviction that he, though he had died, was 
 the Messiah. Such is the doctrine of the Epistle of James, 
 in which, as in the early chapters of Acts, there is no word 
 respecting a sacrificial character attaching to the death of 
 Jesus nor any ascription of divinity to him, nothing but the 
 exhortation to lead a holy life in expectation of his coming. 
 
 It was thus that the early disciples interpreted the teach- 
 ings of Jesus in the light of their own hopes. From 'their 
 opinions we may gather what had been the nature of his 
 instruction. We may infer that he had spoken of himself 
 only as the servant of God, sent to announce the new order 
 of things, the essence of which was unfeigned love to God 
 and man. There was here an extraordinary concurrence 
 of favorable conditions : a people with a firmly organized 
 monotheistic faith, and in contact with the best ethical 
 thought of the time ; a circle within the people conscious 
 of the lacks of the existing system and anxious to estab- 
 lish a higher spirituality ; a general belief that God, in ac- 
 cordance with his ancient promises, was about to introduce 
 a new order of things ; a man who by his extraordinary 
 endowments was able to inspire a select circle of followers 
 with a controlling enthusiasm both for his person as the 
 final deliverer sent by God, and, in a germinal way, for 
 those lofty principles of ethical-religious life which he set 
 forth in his teaching and illustrated in his conduct, these 
 were the conditions of the birth of Christianity, briefly and 
 roughly stated. Those subtle influences which we call the 
 spirit of the age and the spirit of the teacher require for 
 their detailed comprehension fuller literary data than we 
 possess ; but from the existing records and from the sue-
 
 RELATION OF JESUS TO CHRISTIANITY. 427 
 
 ceeding religious development we may infer their general 
 character, and it appears that the early Church was the 
 direct product of the teaching and personality of Jesus. 
 
 3. This was the dogmatic position of the Church when 
 Saul of Tarsus entered it. It is unnecessary here to attempt 
 to explain his conversion. From the little bit of autobi- 
 ography in the first chapter of Galatians it may be con- 
 cluded that the person of Jesus had made a profound 
 impression on him. We may suspect that to Paul he was 
 from the first more than the risen Messiah who was to 
 restore Israel, that the future apostle saw in him even 
 then the hope of that spiritual regeneration for which he 
 seems to have been long struggling. Unfortunately Paul 
 has left us no full account of his early experiences, only 
 reminiscences which may be colored by his later thought. 
 We know only the dogmatic system which he worked out 
 after many years spent in Arabia and Syria. There he 
 came into contact with Gentiles, whose peculiar position 
 may well have caused him to reflect on the conditions 
 of church-membership, and have helped to lead him to the 
 conclusion that salvation was complete in Christ without 
 the works of the Law. This was equivalent in his mind 
 to affirming that Christ had worked out a perfect right- 
 eousness, since without perfect righteousness there could 
 be no salvation, and man's own righteousness was neces- 
 sarily imperfect. But this imputed righteousness was in- 
 separably connected in his conception with an inward spirit 
 of obedience, an impulse of love, the gift of God through 
 Christ. Such an idea may have been present to him from 
 the moment when the conviction had seized on him that the 
 true Christ was this suffering crucified man of spotless life. 
 Paul seems (such is the impression made on us by the 
 history) to have had a sudden revelation (born of much 
 preceding struggle of soul) that God's promised salvation
 
 428 RELATION OF JESUS TO CHRISTIANITY. 
 
 was a spiritual one, and that it was embodied in Jesus of 
 Nazareth. Salvation carried with it remission of sins, and 
 remission of sins implied an offering ; thus the death of 
 Jesus naturally assumed a sacrificial character. Paul's 
 whole scheme was not only made possible but was forced 
 on him by his conception of the person of Jesus. 
 
 We may suppose that it was by some such process of 
 feeling that the Church at large came to interpret as the 
 foundation of salvation that mysterious death which it had 
 at first regarded as an interruption of the divine deliver- 
 ance. The disappearance of the Messiah from the earth 
 was hard to understand. Surely, said the disciples, he will 
 come again to complete what he has begun. Then with 
 the growth of spirituality in a section of the Church (for 
 one portion of it seems never to have advanced beyond the 
 Old Testament point of view as given in the Epistle of 
 James) came the belief that the end of the divine inter- 
 vention was deliverance from sin, and Jesus was regarded 
 as the exalted Son of God who had given his life for men. 
 This conception of the Master is found in the majority of 
 the books of the New Testament. In his death that age, 
 looking on sacrifice as an absolute necessity, found a com- 
 plete solution of the problem of satisfaction for sin. The 
 Jewish ethical-spiritual thought thus created out of the 
 person of Jesus a framework (indispensable for that time) 
 for his higher religious teaching. 
 
 The exaltation of Jesus, implied in the title "the Lord 
 Jesus Christ" and in the frequent coupling of his name 
 with that of God the Father, was a natural consequence 
 of the increasing value which was attached to his person 
 and work. Withdrawn from earth, he was thought of as 
 in heaven, and charged with the salvation of men, he was 
 believed to be invested with the universal authority neces- 
 sary for the fulfilment of his mission. When this feeling
 
 RELATION OF JESUS TO CHRISTIANITY. 429 
 
 first found expression it is not easy to say. That it was 
 not in existence immediately after the death of Jesus may 
 be inferred from the narratives of the Synoptics ; but the 
 general impression made on us by Paul's history of his 
 conversion (Gal. i.) is that it formed a part of the apostle's 
 experience at an early stage of his Christian career. The 
 Lord Jesus is thought of as sitting at the right hand of 
 God and controlling the destinies of men. This concep- 
 tion, interpreted as a part of the new-born Christian con- 
 sciousness, signifies the exaltation of righteousness to the 
 place of honor in the world. In the person of the Re- 
 deemer it is made glorious and everlasting. Yet on the 
 dogmatic side this exaltation of Jesus is always in the 
 Pauline period distinguished from deification. He is 
 the Lord, the pre-existent Son of God, but he acts accord- 
 ing to the will of God, who sent him forth (Gal. i. 4 ; iv. 4) ; 
 he is God's as believers are Christ's ; all spiritual life is 
 in him because he has been made by God the source of 
 life (1 Cor. i. 33; iii. 23); all things shall be subjected 
 to him that he himself may then be subjected to God (1 
 Cor. xv. 28) ; he is the fulfilment of the promises unto the 
 glory of God, which shines in his face (2 Cor. i. 20 ; iv. 6) ; 
 God reconciles men to himself in Christ, and raises them 
 from the dead as he raised Jesus (2 Cor. v. 19 : iv. 14) ; 
 Christ was born of the seed of David according to the 
 flesh and determined to be the Son of God according to 
 the spirit by the resurrection from the dead (Rom. i. 3, 4) ; 
 and as final judge of men (2 Cor. v. 10) he is the agent of 
 God (Rom. ii. 16). 1 An exalted position not thought of by 
 
 1 On Rom. ix. 5, see the discussion by Abbot and Dwight in Vol. I. of 
 " The Journal of the Society of Biblical Literature and Exegesis," (Boston, 
 1881). The passnge must be interpreted in accordance with Paul's un- 
 varying usage elsewhere, and it may fairly be said to be highly improbable 
 that the author of Galatians, Corinthians, and Romans should apply the 
 epithet "God" to Christ.
 
 430 RELATION OF JESUS TO CHRISTIANITY. 
 
 himself was assigned him ; but conceived, as it was, reve- 
 rently and soberly, it did not impugn the aloneness of 
 God, and practically served to give impressiveness to the 
 fundamental religious ideas of the Master. It was, we 
 may conclude, the natural way in which the age expressed 
 its estimate of his greatness. 1 
 
 To this portraiture of the function of Jesus Paul added 
 the conception of perfect legal righteousness worked out 
 by him and reckoned as a legally justifying fact to every 
 believer. This idea was not embraced by the whole Church 
 of the first century (it does not appear in the Apocalypse, 
 the Epistle to the Hebrews, the Fourth Gospel, or the 
 Pastoral Epistles, or indeed distinctly anywhere except 
 in the four great Pauline Epistles), nor has it ever suc- 
 ceeded in establishing itself firmly in the Christian con- 
 sciousness. Yet, though its scholastic and apparently 
 mechanical form has often been repellent, it is based, as 
 has been pointed out above, on a profound ethical-spiritual 
 feeling, on the conviction that man's spiritual powers can 
 have full play only when he is relieved from the obliga- 
 tion of an impossible performance and quickened into 
 activity by love. Jesus himself did not hold that the 
 efficacy of the divine love in awakening in man's soul love 
 of holiness depended on the forensic intermediation of an 
 imputed righteousness ; but to Paul, with his peculiar train- 
 ing and experience, such an intermediary appeared to be 
 necessary. In general the position of mediator assigned 
 by the Church of the first century to Jesus seems to have 
 been alien to his thought. This departure from his teach - 
 
 1 So far as Paul and the early Church are concerned, such an estimate 
 might be held to have grown up on purely Jewish soil, though Greek influ- 
 ence is neither impossible nor improbable. Exaltation of men into the 
 divine sphere was rather an Hellenic than a Semitic mode of thought, and 
 may have been insensibly appropriated by a portion of the Jewish world. 
 Whether this was actually the fact, it is hardly possible to say.
 
 RELATION OF JESUS TO CHRISTIANITY. 431 
 
 ing is an evidence of his power. The Jew of that period 
 (and the New Testament writers were probably all Jews) 
 could hardly conceive of an immediate friendly relation 
 between God and man ; all the past religious development, 
 beginning from primitive times, involved the interposition 
 of some reconciling or propitiating agency. For the Jew 
 it had been the national system of sacrifices. That Jesus 
 took the place of this great mediatorial scheme, which the 
 wisdom and mercy of God, it was believed, had devised 
 for the fathers, shows the enormous significance which was 
 attached to his person, the controlling power of his person- 
 ality ; he, by the impression he made, coerced and revolu- 
 tionized the religious apparatus of a nation. It is possible, 
 it is even probable, that the disciples never asked them- 
 selves whether the Master had practically ignored medi- 
 ating agency in his teaching. His silence on this point 
 would hardly attract their attention ; they would assume 
 that he taught what the Scriptures enjoined. The graft- 
 ing of a mediatorial doctrine on his conception of salva- 
 tion was doubtless an unconscious procedure on their part ; 
 the doctrine was a part of that framework without which 
 the age seemed unable to appropriate his higher thought. 1 
 
 4. While the Jewish and the Pauline conceptions of 
 Christianity were thus moving side by side, a new ten- 
 dency of thought was coming into view. The union of 
 Greek philosophical speculation with Jewish theology had 
 produced the Alexandrian doctrine of the logos, the con- 
 ception of an exalted being nearly allied in nature to God, 
 
 1 Here again, in the development of the Christian mediatorial scheme, 
 the possibility of non-Jewish influence must be admitted. Such influence is 
 certain so far as regards the logos-doctrine, which involved the idea of 
 mediation. Whether the Persian conception of intermediation (JMithraJwas 
 then in position to be effective is doubtful. The groundwork of the Chris- 
 tian idea was Jewish ; the possibility of its extension, as it appears in the 
 New Testament, was probably made easier by the diffusion of Greek (and | 
 perhaps of Persian) modes of thought.
 
 432 KELATION OF JESUS TO CHRISTIANITY. 
 
 the image of the divine glory, the agent in the divine 
 creation, standing midway between God and the world as 
 mediator between the two. This conception, originating 
 in Alexandria (to this conclusion the documentary evidence 
 points), seems to have made its way to Asia Minor, and 
 perhaps to other parts of the Jewish world. At any rate 
 it commended itself to not a few Christians, who recog- 
 nized its grandeur and relevancy and saw in the descrip- 
 tion of the mediating image and son of God a portraiture 
 of the person and work of the Christ of God, Jesus of 
 Nazareth. This construction of the divine method of 
 government is expressed in four books of the New Tes- 
 tament, the Epistles to the Hebrews, the Ephesians, 
 the Colossians, and the Eourth Gospel, which rnay thus 
 be considered to form in this respect a separate group. 
 They agree in ascribing to Jesus the most exalted position 
 in the universe under God. They differ in the terms which 
 they apply to him, and in the way in which they repre- 
 sent his functions in the divine plan of salvation, as well 
 as in their view of the human conditions of salvation ; they 
 differ also so far as regards the circumstances of the cir- 
 cles to which they are addressed. The design of Hebrews 
 (addressed to Jewish Christians by one who felt called on 
 to reconcile the Jewish sacrificial idea with his Pauline- 
 Alexandrian conception of Jesus) is to portray Jesus as 
 the priest and sacrifice of a new covenant made far more 
 glorious than the old by his personality. He, says the 
 Epistle (i. 1-4), appointed heir of all things and agent in 
 the work of creation, the impress of the divine substance, 
 made purification of sins and sat down on the right hand 
 of the Majesty on high, having become by so much better 
 than the angels as he had inherited a more excellent 
 name than they. The author's leading idea is the dig- 
 nity of the priestly Saviour, whom he identifies with the
 
 RELATION OF JESUS TO CHRISTIANITY. 433 
 
 Alexandrian creative logos. The Epistle to the Ephesians 
 sets forth against Jewish exclusiveness the sufficiency of 
 the salvation of Christ, presenting him as the consumma- 
 tion of all things (i. 10), lord over the universe and head 
 of the Churcli. by divine appointment (i. 20-23), the reve- 
 lation of the divine wisdom to the heavenly principalities 
 and powers (iii. 10). The author of Colossians is led to 
 speak more fully of the person of Jesus, his polemic being 
 directed against a current form of Gnosticism (apparently 
 Jewish) which laid stress on angelic intermediaries be- 
 tween God and man and on ascetic observances (ii. 16-19). 
 In opposition to this belief he represents Christ as the 
 image of God, the first-born of the creation, the agent in 
 the creation of the universe, the head of the Church, the 
 possessor of the fulness [the Gnostic pleroma, the content 
 of all being], the reconciler of all things to God (i. 15-20), 
 forms of expression substantially identical with those 
 of Philo. The relation of the Fourth Gospel (in the same 
 category with which is the First Epistle of John) to the 
 Jewish-Alexandrian philosophy has already been pointed 
 out : here Jesus is the logos, head of the kingdom of 
 light and life, himself revealer and source of salvation. 
 
 The variety and vividness of these portraitures of Jesus, 
 the activity and enthusiasm of thought they show, is an 
 indication of his wonderful power. His person assimilated 
 all the elements of thought of the time. Into whatever 
 circle his name made its entrance, it there became the 
 controlling factor. He represented purity and salvation, 
 and around him as a centre all systems of life and of the 
 universe arranged themselves. The Church in expanding 
 and embellishing his theology still made him the essence 
 of her theology. With all the variations in other points 
 
 she held fast to the conception of Jesus as the exalted 
 
 
 
 Saviour. Salvation was inseparably connected with his per- 
 
 28
 
 434 RELATION OF JESUS TO CHRISTIANITY. 
 
 son, this was the inspiring idea of Christianity. As to 
 how the salvation was effected by what acts or expe- 
 riences of God, of Christ, and of men there were differ- 
 ences of view. The Pauline theory of imputed righteousness 
 does not appear outside of Paul's writings. Hebrews and 
 First Timothy represent faith as exercised toward God 
 primarily (" God our Saviour," 1 Tim. ii. 3). These, together 
 with Ephesians, Colossians, Second Timothy, Titus, First 
 Peter, and the Apocalypse, refer to the death of Christ 
 as expiatory. The Fourth Gospel and the First of the 
 Epistles ascribed to John further lay stress on the living 
 union of the soul with Jesus, who is regarded as mysti- 
 cally imparting spiritual life or giving entrance into the 
 kingdom of light. But amid all these variations the per- 
 son of Jesus remains the centre of the religious life. It 
 was indeed this personal character of the Christian faith 
 and hope which both produced or permitted individual 
 differences, and maintained the substantial unity of the 
 Church in spite of them. A great inspiring idea, the idea 
 of salvation, was cast forth into the world, and men held 
 it in such forms as were suggested by their views of God 
 and the world. Thus it was possible that a real catholic 
 church with a catholic faith could exist amid such diver- 
 sities of national, social, and intellectual relations as the 
 Church of the early centuries showed. It is further true 
 that the ethical teaching and example of the Master deter- 
 mined the ethical creed of the Church. For him salva- 
 tion was oneness of soul with God, and his followers, 
 though they developed his religious teaching in a theo- 
 logical way and departed from the simplicity of his doc- 
 trine, did not forget the spirit of his life. The sweetness 
 of patient, self-forgetting love which entered, like a breath 
 from heaven, into the hardness of the Eoman world, was 
 the copy of the daily life of Jesus, strengthened by the
 
 EELATION OF JESUS TO CHKISTIANITY. 435 
 
 belief that his atoning death made manifest the value of 
 the individual soul and swept away the artificial barriers 
 that had hitherto separated men. In a word, the Church 
 was the creation of Jesus partly by his direct teaching, 
 partly by the stimulating and organizing power of his 
 personality. 
 
 The formative period of the Church extended over the 
 first century following the death of Jesus. Then came a 
 formulating period of about three centuries during which 
 a number of ideas which in the New Testament books are 
 more or less fluid were put into the shape of propositions 
 and received as dogmas. Each of the great races that 
 embraced Christianity impressed its thought and its per- 
 sonality on the body of doctrine. The faith passed from 
 the Greek and Latin to the Celtic and Germanic commu- 
 nities of Europe. Protestantism threw away part of the 
 great mass of beliefs which the medieval Catholic Church 
 had accumulated, and entered on its own career of trans- 
 formation. Both branches of Christianity, Catholic and 
 Protestant, have followed the currents of modern thought; 
 there is not a phase of science, philosophy, or literature 
 but has left its impress on the body of beliefs that con- 
 trol Christendom. But in all this freedom of movement 
 the person of Jesus has maintained its place as the centre 
 of religious life. Whatever the particular construction of 
 the theology, whether he be regarded as substantially di- 
 vine or only as a profoundly inspired man, whether his death 
 or his life be most emphasized, whether Church or Bible 
 be accepted as infallible guide, he is ever the leader and 
 model of religious experience. It becomes more and more 
 evident that the fundamental truths which he announced 
 are as new as they were in his time, and that he alone is 
 in the highest sense the founder of Christianity.
 
 INDEX OF CITATIONS. 
 
 Page 
 en. i.-xi. . . 160, 195 
 196 
 
 OLD TESTAMENT 
 
 Page 
 Ex. iii. 6 . . . 394 n. 
 vi. 3 . . . . 306 w. 
 xiv. 20 . . . 113 n. 
 xv. 16 .... 107 
 xxi.-xxiii. . 235, 237 
 xxiii. 21 ... 91, 148 
 xxxiii. 14 ... 90 
 xxxiii. 15 ... 148 
 Lev. iv 226 
 
 i 
 
 Page 
 2 Sam. vii. 14 . . 317 
 xii 309 n. 
 
 .2 .... 161 w. 
 . 20, 21 . . . 161 n. 
 .26-28 .... 173 
 . 26 . . 147, 153, 161 
 i. 1 101 
 
 xii. 1-14 . . 184 n. 
 xxiv 185 n. 
 xxiv. 1 .... 157 
 1 Kings iv. 29-34 . 135 
 v. 32 135 
 
 i. 7 . . . 173, 175 
 i. 15 (Sept.) . 409 . 
 iii. . . . 157, 167, 194, 
 195, 199, 204, 209 
 iii. 21 197 
 iii. 22 198 
 
 viii. . . 309 ., 312 
 xvii. 21 .... 175 
 xxii. 19-23 ... 144 
 xxii. 21 .... 165 
 2 Kings ii. 9 ... 176 
 iii. 15 . . . . 145 . 
 vi. 17 149 
 
 v. vi 226 
 v. 1 175 
 
 xvi. . . 143, 167, 226 
 xvi. 17 .... 109 
 xvii. 7 .... 142 
 xvii. 11 . . . . 174 
 xviii. 18 . . . . 17 . 
 xxi. 11 .... 175 
 xxiv. 11 .... 91 
 Num. xxi. 4 ... 175 
 xxiv. 7 ... 113 n. 
 Dent. v. 9 . . . . 185 
 
 iv. 16-24 . . 160 n. 
 iv. 18 . . . . 160 n. 
 iv. 26 . . . . 306 n. 
 v 196 
 
 xiv. 25 .... 134 
 xxiii. 10 .... 406 
 1 Chron. i.-ix. . . 55 n. 
 xxi. 1 . 78, 157, 202 
 2 Chron. xiv. 11 . . 127 
 xxxii. 8 .... 174 
 Ezra ii 55 n. 
 
 v. 18 . . . . 160 n. 
 v. 29 196 
 
 vi.-ix 196 
 
 vi. . . . 65, 167, 201 
 vi. 1, 2 .... 159 
 vi. 2 147 
 
 viii. 3 ... 104, 105 
 xiii. 3 175 
 
 vii. 6 259 
 
 Neh. ii. 8 . . . 409 n. 
 
 viii. 21 .... 176 
 ix. 4 174 
 
 xxviii.-xxx. . . 312 
 xxxii. 8 . 147 ., 151 . 
 xxxii. 17. 142 n., 155 
 Josh. v. 1 .... 176 
 
 vii. 7, 66 . . 312 . 
 viii 127 
 
 xi 7 . . 147 
 
 xii. 5 175 
 
 ix. 6 . . . . 161 n. 
 xii. 11 .... 55 n. 
 Job i. ii 147 
 
 xii. 13 . . 175, 194 
 xv. 4 .... 177 n 
 
 v. 13 148 
 
 vii. 24, 25 ... 184 
 Judg. vi. 11 ... 121 
 ix 23 ... 145 
 
 xv. 6 .... 275 
 
 i. 5 227 
 
 xv. 10 .... 107 
 xvi. 7, 13 ... 91 
 xvi. 7-13 ... 148 
 xviii. . . . 202, 272 
 xviii. 19 .... 147 
 xviii. 25 .... 81 
 xx 272 
 
 j. 8 ]65 
 
 xi 24 ... 306 
 
 iii 8 .... 162 
 
 xiii 121 
 
 iv. 15 . . . . 145 re. 
 vii. 17-21 ... 228 
 ix. 13 162 
 x. 1 175 
 xiii. 25 ..... 228 
 xiv. 1-3 .... 228 
 xix. 25-27 . 381, 388, 
 389 
 xxvi. 6 . . . 404 w. 
 xxvi. 12 .... 162 
 xxvi. 13 . .92 n., 162 
 xxviii. . . 98, 98 . 
 xxviii. 22 . . 404 n. 
 xxxii.-xxxvii. . 98 . 
 xxxiii. 23, 24 . . 228 
 xxxviii. 7 . . 147, 161 
 
 xiii. 13, 18 ... 91 
 xiii. 18 . . 148, 317 
 xiv. 6 .... 92 . 
 1 Sam. ii. 16 ... 175 
 xii. 23 .... 228 
 xv .... 309 n. 
 
 xxvi 272 
 
 xxvi. 7 .... 194 
 xxvii 194 
 xxvii. 33-37 . 103 n. 
 xxix. 14 .... 174 
 xxx 194 
 
 xvi 168 
 
 xvi. 13, 14 . . . 92 . 
 xvi. 14-23 ... 145 
 xvi. 23 . . . 145 n. 
 xix. 20 . . . . 92 n. 
 xix. 24 .... 170 
 xxviii. . . . 143 n. 
 2 Sam. v. 1 ... 174 
 vii. . . .184 ., 316 
 
 xxxi. 12, 13 . . 109 
 xxxii. 24, 30 .. 91 
 xxxv. 11 . . 177 n. 
 xii. 8 176 
 
 xliii. 30 ... 177 n.
 
 433 
 
 INDEX OF CITATIONS. 
 
 
 Paze 
 . . 162 
 
 Ps. Ivi 4 . . 
 Ivii. 4 . . 
 Iviii. 1 . . 
 Iviii. 2 . . 
 lix. 3 ... 
 
 Page 
 . . 174 
 . . 175 
 . 147 n. 
 . . 78 
 . . 189 
 
 Prov. i. 10-14 
 ii. 16-19 . 
 iii. 13-20 . 
 iii. 16 
 v. ... 
 
 Page 
 . . 100 n. 
 . . 100 n. 
 ... 99 
 ... 404 
 . . . 100 
 
 xli. . . . 
 
 . . 162 
 
 xli 1 . 
 
 . . 161 
 
 xlii. . . 
 
 . . 272 
 
 xlii. 8 . . 
 Ps. ii. . . . 
 
 227, 228 
 . 400 
 
 Ixii. 5 . . 
 Ixv . . . 
 
 . . 175 
 . . 80 
 
 v. 11 . . 
 
 . . . 174 
 
 ii 7 
 
 . 317 
 
 vi. 1-5 . 
 vii. . . . 
 
 . . 100 n. 
 . . 100 n 
 
 ii. 9 . . . 
 
 . 120 
 
 l\.v. 2 . . 
 
 . . 174 
 
 iv 2 . . . 
 
 87 
 
 Ixvi. 18 . . 
 
 Ixviii. . . 
 
 . . 176 
 . . 202 
 . . 187 
 
 viii. i.-ix. 6 
 viii. 22, 31 
 ix. 13-18 . 
 x. 27 . . 
 
 ... 99 
 ... 100 
 . . 100 n. 
 . . . 404 
 
 v. 10 . . . 
 vi 1 
 
 206 n. 
 87 
 
 vi. 2 . . . 
 
 . 174 
 
 Ixix. 16 . . 
 Ixxi. 20 . . 
 Ixxii. 13 . . 
 Ixxii. 17 
 / Ixxiii. 18-20 
 Ixxiii. 21 . 
 Ixxiii 24 
 Ixxiii. 26 
 Ixxiv. . . 
 Ixxiv. 8 . . 
 Ixxiv. 21 . 
 Ixxix. . . 
 Ixxx. . . . 
 
 . . 87 
 . . 380 
 . . 175 
 . . 357 
 . . 87 
 . 177 n. 
 . . 380 
 . . 177 
 . . 61 
 . . 247 
 . . 162 
 . 61, 223 
 204, 223 
 . . 78 
 
 vii. 10 . . 
 
 . 176 
 . 147 
 
 xiii. 12 . 
 
 XV. 1 . . 
 
 . . . 176 
 . . . 294 
 
 ix. 17. . . 
 
 . 379 
 
 XV. 11 . 
 
 xvi. 2 . . 
 
 . . 404 n. 
 . . . 176 
 
 x. 6 ... 
 
 . 176 
 
 x. 14, 36 . . 
 
 xiv. 2, 3 . . 
 
 XV 
 
 xvi. . . 379, 
 xvi. 9 . . . 
 xvi. 10 . . . 
 xvi. 11 . . . 
 
 . 80 
 206 n. 
 . 236 
 380, 389 
 . 174 
 . 388 
 . 87 
 . 389 
 
 xvii. 9 
 xxiv. 17 . 
 xxiv. 29 . 
 xxv. 1 
 xxv. 9 
 
 . . . 294 
 . . . 294 
 . . . 294 
 . . . 135 
 . . . 293 
 
 xxv. 21, 22 
 Eceles. ii. 5 
 ii. 24 . . 
 
 . 294, 297 
 . . 409 n. 
 . . . 175 
 
 
 . 380 
 
 iii. 21 . . 
 
 . . . 176 
 
 xvii. 15 . . . 
 xviii. 20-27 . . 
 xix 
 
 380, 388 
 . 189 
 80 
 
 Ixxxii. 1, 6 . 
 Ixxxii 6 . 
 
 . 147 . 
 . . 422 
 
 vii. 20 
 vii. 28 . 
 viii. 12 
 ix. 10 . . 
 
 . . 206 n. 
 . . 210 n. 
 . . 192 n. 
 . . . 59 
 
 Ixxxiv. 2 
 Ixxxv. . . 
 Ixxxv. 1, 2 . 
 Ixxxvii. . . 
 Ixxxix. 48 . 
 xc. 4 ... 
 xciii. ... 
 
 174, 177 
 .. . 223 
 . . 187 
 237, 314 
 . . 175 
 . 374 n. 
 . . 80 
 
 xix. 7 . . . 
 xxiv. . . . 
 xxv. 4 . . . 
 xxv. 7 . . 
 xxv. 11 . . . 
 .xx vii. 1 . . . 
 xxix 
 
 . 175 
 236, 237 
 
 . 87 
 187, 228 
 . 230 
 . 87 
 . 80 
 
 x. 3 . . 
 xii. 9-14 . 
 Cant. iv. 13 
 v. 4 . . 
 Isa. i. . . 
 i. 10-18 . 
 i. 11 . . 
 
 . . 192 n. 
 . . . 59 
 . . 409 n. 
 . . 177 n. 
 . . 315 n. 
 . . . 222 
 . . . 229 
 
 xcv. 5 . . 
 xcvi. . 80, 
 xcvii. 7 . . 
 xcviii. . . 
 ci 
 
 . . 155 
 357 n., 398 
 . 147 n. 
 . 357 n. 
 . . 237 
 . . 80 
 
 xxix. 1 . . . 
 xxxi 
 
 147 n. 
 
 . 187 
 
 ii. 2-4 . . 
 
 . . . 313 
 
 xxxii. . . . 
 xxxii. 5 . . 
 xxxiii. 6 . . 
 xxxiii. 16 . . 
 xxxiv. 20 . . 
 xxxv. 3 . . . 
 xxx vi. 2 . . 
 xxxvi. 10 . . 
 xxxviii. 1 . . 
 xxxviii. 3, 20 . 
 xxxix. 8, 11 . 
 xl. 6 . . . . 
 
 . 188 
 228, 230 
 . 104 
 . 127 
 . 87 
 . 87 
 206 n. 
 . 188 
 . 87 
 . 187 
 . 86 
 . 229 
 
 ii. 5 . . 
 ii. 6-22 . 
 iii. . 
 
 . . 314 . 
 . . 315 n. 
 . . 315 n 
 
 ciii. 8-10, 12 
 ciii. 12-14 . 
 ciii. 13 . . 
 ciii. 13, 14 . 
 civ. . . . 
 civ. 26 . . 
 civ. 29 . . 
 civ. 30 . . 
 cvi. 37 . . 
 cvii. . . . 
 
 . . 227 
 . . 87 
 . . 84 
 . . 228 
 . 79, 80 
 . . 162 
 . 204 n. 
 . 92 n. 
 . . 155 
 . . 79 
 
 iv. 1 . . 
 iv. 2 . . 
 iv. 2-6 . 
 v. ... 
 
 . . 315 n. 
 . . 316 n. 
 . . . 315 
 . . . 204 
 
 v.-x. . . 
 vi 9 13 . 
 
 . . 315 n. 
 . . . 310 
 
 vii.-x. 
 vii. 10-12 
 vii. 14 . 
 viii 
 
 . . . 321 
 . . . 123 
 
 . . . 317 
 . 378 
 
 xl. 6-8 . . 
 xl. 11 . . . 
 xliv 
 xliv. 17, 18 . . 
 xlv. 3 . . . . 
 
 138, 230 
 . 87 
 61, 332 
 . 189 
 . 317 
 
 cvii. 20 . . 
 cviii. 4 . . 
 
 104, 105 
 . . 87 
 
 . . 400 
 
 viii. 16 .... 69 
 viii. 18 .... 137 
 viii. 19 142 n., 143 n., 
 378 
 ix. 6 . . - - 3r,7 
 
 
 87 
 
 xlix. 15 . . . 
 1. 9-13 . . . 
 1.16-21 . . . 
 Ii. . . . 187, 
 Ii. 1, 2 . . . 
 Ii. 3 . . . . 
 
 . 380 
 . 230 
 . 87 
 206, 236 
 . 86 
 . 228 
 
 cxvi. 5 .... 87 
 cxix. . . 236, 240, 278 
 cxix. 120 ... 174 
 cxxxvi. 37 . . 142 n. 
 cxxxvii. ... 18, 61 
 cxxxix. 17 ... 87 
 cxliii.2 ... 206 n. 
 cxlv. 8, 9 ... 7 
 
 ix. 6, 7 . 
 
 . 315 n., 317 
 . . 396 n. 
 
 x. 18 . . 
 x. 20, 24-27 
 x. 21 . . 
 x. 22 . . 
 
 . . . 173 
 . . . 310 
 . . 317 n. 
 . . 336 n. 
 . . . 317 
 
 Ii. 4 . . . . 
 
 . 230 
 
 Ii. 6 . . . . 
 
 . 191 
 
 Ii. 10 . . . . 
 Ii. 12 . . . . 
 
 86, 176 
 .92 n. 
 
 cxlviii. . . 
 
 . . 80 
 
 xi. 2 . . 
 
 . . . 317 
 
 cxlviii. 5 
 Prov. i.-ix. 
 
 . . 161 
 58, 100 n. 
 
 xi. 1-9 . 
 xii. . 
 
 . . . 316 
 61 
 
 Ii. 17 . 
 
 , 176
 
 INDEX OF CITATIONS. 
 
 439 
 
 Page 
 Isa. xiii. ... 396 n. 
 xiii. 21 .... 155 
 xiv 396 n. 
 xiv. 9 .... 404 n. 
 xiv. 9, 10 ... 379 
 xiv. 24-32 . . 315 . 
 xv.-xviii. . . 315 M. 
 
 Page 
 Jer. iv. 19 ... 177 n. 
 iv. 28 .... 361 n. 
 vii. 22 .... 229 
 x. 1-16 ... 315 . 
 xi. 20 . . . . 177 n. 
 xv. 1 228 
 
 Pape 
 Dan. ix. 24, 25 .. 64 
 x. 13 150 
 x. 20, 21 ... 229 n. 
 xi 320 
 xi. 45 64 
 
 xii. . . 320, 398, 411 
 xii 1 3 392 
 
 xvii. 9, 10 ... 191 
 xxiii. 5-8 . 315 ., 316 
 xxiii. 29 .... 103 
 xxv. 8-11 ... 311 
 xxv. 9 ... 396 . 
 xxv. 12 . . 64, 311 w. 
 xxix. 7 . . . 396 . 
 xxx 311 
 
 xii. 1-4 .... 320 
 xii. 2 . 64, 380 n., 404 
 xii. 9 321 
 
 xix. 18 ... 314 n. 
 xix. 18-25 ... 314 
 xx 315 . 
 
 xxii. 15-25 . . 315 . 
 xxvi. 15, 20 . . 389 
 xxvi. 19 . . 388. 389 
 xxvii. 1 . . 162, 162 n. 
 xxviii.-xxxi. . 315 n. 
 xxviii. 11 ... 138 
 xxix. 4 ... 143 n. 
 xxix. 8 .... 175 
 xxx 7 .... 162 
 
 xii. 11-13 ... 321 
 Hos. i.-xiv. . . 315 . 
 ii 310 
 
 iii 310 
 
 xxxi. 1-30 ... 311 
 xxxi. 31-34 ... 311 
 xxxi. 31-40 . . 311 . 
 xxxiii. 14-26 315.,316 
 xxxviii. 17 175, 396 n. 
 xlix 315 n. 
 
 iii. 5 .... 309 n. 
 iv. 3 . . . . 361 n. 
 vi. 6 ... 232, 2(54 
 xi 1 . 83 S17 
 
 xiv. 1-7 .... 310 
 Joel i.-iii 31/8 
 ii. 28-iii. 21 . . 314 
 iii. 334 n., 357 n., 396 n. 
 Amosi.-ix. . . 315 n. 
 i 396 n. 
 
 xxx. 33 .... 406 
 xxxi. 3 .... 174 
 xxxii. 1-8 ... 317 
 xxxii. 10 . . 92 n. 
 xxxiv. 14 . 142, 155 
 xxxiv. 45 ... 242 
 xxxv. 5 .... 330 
 xxxvii. 21-35 . 315 w. 
 xxxviii 38-2 
 xl 322 
 
 ] -III 315 n . 
 
 1. . . 242, 311, 396 . 
 Ii. . 242, 311 n., 396 n. 
 Lam. ii. 11 . . . 177 n. 
 
 Ezek. i. -xxxiii. . 315 n. 
 xi. 19 173 
 
 ji 396 n. 
 
 iii 307 
 
 xiii. 19 .... 175 
 xiv. 12-20 . . 272 n. 
 xiv. 14 .... 64 
 xvi 204 
 
 iii. 2 .... 336 n. 
 v. 21-23 .... 229 
 v. 27 309 
 
 vi. 14 309 
 
 xl. 2 . . . 223, 353 
 xiii. 1-17 ... 326 
 xiv. 7 .... 146 
 xlvi 396 n. 
 
 xviii 191 
 
 viii. 8 . 309, 361 n. 
 ix 307 
 
 xviii. 2-4 ... 185 
 xxviii. . . . 195 n. 
 xxix. 17-21 . 396 . 
 xxxi. 18 ... 404 w. 
 xxxiv. 23, 24 . . 315 
 xxxvi. -xlviii. . .311 
 xxxvi. 26-28 190, 191 
 xxxvii 388 
 
 ix. 5 . . . . 361 n. 
 ix. 9 309 
 
 xlvii 396 n. 
 xlviii. 16 . . 92 n. 
 xlix. 1-6 ... 166 
 xlix. 5 .... 326 
 xlix. 6 .... 225 
 liii. . . 166, 280, 322, 
 330 n., 352, 420 
 liii. 1-9 .... 224 
 liii. 10 .... 175 
 liii. 10-12 ... 225 
 Iv. 11 . . . 103, 104 
 lix. 7, 8 . . . 206 n. 
 Ix.-lxvi. ... 311 
 Ix. . . 324 n , 336 n. 
 Ix. 10, 12 ... 225 
 Ixi 313 
 
 ix. 11-15 . . 309 n. 
 Obadiah .... 396 n. 
 Mic. i.-iii. . . 3K*, 315 n. 
 i. 8 170 
 
 iv.-vii. . . . 310 n. 
 iv. 1-5 .... 313 
 iv. 2, 5 . . . 314 >/. 
 iv. 6-13 ... 310 n. 
 v. 2-8 .... 316 
 v. 2 ... 330, 357 
 vi. . . . 310 n., 315 w. 
 vi. 7 . . . 175, 229 
 vii. . . . 312 
 
 xxxvii. 11-14 . . 389 
 xxxvii 2, 25 . . 315 
 xxxvii. 25 ... 403 
 xxxviii. . . 320, 373 
 xxxix. . . 320, 373 
 xl.-xlviii. . 70, 133 . 
 xliv. 15 .. 254, 315 
 xlviii. . . . 374 . 
 xlviii. 11, 35 . . 316 
 Dan. i. 8 ... 192 n. 
 I. 8, 12 .... 255 
 ii 320 
 ii 11 174 
 
 Nahum i.-iii. . 310, 315, 
 396 n. 
 Hab. i.-iii. . . 315 n. 
 ii. 14 ... 310, 317 
 iii Cl 
 
 Ixii. 5 83 
 Ixiii. 3 .... 120 
 Ixiii. 9 ... 90, 148 
 Ixv. . . . , . 37f 
 
 ii. 44 . . . . 321 n. 
 iv. 8 . . . . 92 n. 
 v 12 . ... 176 
 
 jjj 14 90 n. 
 
 Zeph. i. 11 . . 310, 315 n. 
 Hi 310 n. 
 
 Ixv. 11 .... 155 
 Ixv. 17-25 ... 311 
 Ixv. 17 . . 401, 408 
 Ixvi . . 408 
 
 vii. . 67 ., 320, 321, 
 354, 357 n., 398 
 vii. 9 325 
 
 Hag. ii. 6-9 ... 313 
 Zech i -viii. . . . 313 
 
 i. 9 149 
 
 Ixvi. 19-24 ... 311 
 Ixvi. 22 .... 408 
 Ixvi. 24 .... 406 
 Jer. i. 5 326 
 ii. 1 83 
 ii. 26, 27 ... 143 n. 
 iii. 4 83 
 
 vii. 13 .... 354 
 vii. 21-27 ... 64 
 vii. 27 ... 321 n. 
 viii ... . 320 
 
 i. 12 223 
 
 iii 148 
 
 iii. 1,2 .... 91 
 vi. 12 316 
 
 viii. 16 .... 150 
 ix 320, 329 
 ix. 2 127 
 
 
 viii. 1-15 ... 313 
 ix.-xiv 314
 
 440 
 
 INDEX OF CITATIONS. 
 
 Page 
 
 Zech. ix. 9-17 . . 315 
 ix. 9 . . . 318, 343 
 
 ix. 13 318 
 
 x. 11 . . . . 316 n. 
 xii.-xiv 315 
 
 Page 
 
 Zech. xiii. 2 ... 77 
 
 xiv. . . . 313, 398 
 
 xiv. 20, 21 ... 315 
 
 Mai. iii. iv. ... 313 
 
 Page 
 Mai. iii. 1 .... 330 
 
 iii. 14 80 
 
 iv 357 n. 
 
 iv. 5 330 
 
 APOCRYPHA. 
 
 1 Esdras iii. iv. . . 51 
 2 Esdras vi. 49-52 . 162 
 vii. 28, 29 .. 67 n 
 
 Ecclus. xxviii. 2-5 . 29< 
 xxix. 2, 12, 20 . 294 
 xxxvi. 1-17 . . 318 
 
 Enoch xxxii. . . . 409 
 xxxvii. -Ixxi. . . 325 
 xxxvii 401 
 
 x. 11, 7 ... 67 n 
 xii. 10-32 . . 67 n 
 xiii. 32, 37 . . 67 w 
 xiv. 9 ... 67 w 
 
 xxxvii. 25 ... 311 
 xliv.-xlix. . . . 127 
 xliv. 11-21 ... 273 
 xiv. 17 .... 127 
 
 xlv.-lvii. ... 325 
 xlv.-liv. . . 348 n. 
 xlv.-xlviii. . . . 354 
 xiv 357 n 
 
 Tob. i. 10 ... 192 n 
 iv. 7 294 
 iv. 15 294 
 xii. 8 255 
 xiii 4 .... 84 
 
 xlvii. 11 .... 318 
 1 127, 247 n 
 1. 23, 24 .... 318 
 Baruch ii. 27-35 . . 318 
 iii.-v 66 
 
 xiv. 3 . . 65, 343 n. 
 xiv. 4 .... 65 
 xiv. 5 .... 401 
 xlvi. 6 .... 401 
 xlviii. 3 .... 357 
 
 xiii 12 18 . . . 318 
 
 iv. 36 . . . . 218 
 
 xlvii i. 6 ... 65 357 
 
 xiv 7 .... 318 
 
 v. 5 9 .... 318 
 
 xlviii. 7 .... 326 
 
 Judith ix. 11 ... 87 
 \Visd i. 2 ... 87 
 
 1 Mac. ii. 42 ... 249 
 ii. 57 318 
 
 Ii. . . 357 n., 374, 395 
 Ii. 1 393 
 
 i 6 .... 100 
 
 iii. 18 19 ... 127 
 
 liii 406 
 
 i 7 92 100 
 
 iii 48 127 
 
 liii. 3 .... 203 n. 
 
 ii .... 192 n. 
 
 iv. 9 127 
 
 liv. . 401, 404, 405, 406 
 
 ii. 23 . 202, 205, 207, 378 
 ii 24 78 158 195 
 
 2 Mac. i. 9 . . . . 75 n. 
 i 20 . ... 127 
 
 liv. 5. 6 . . . 203 n. 
 liv. 8 .... 162 n 
 
 202, 205, 207 
 iii 4 294 
 
 ii. 1-8 .... 330 
 ii. 8 127 
 
 Ivi. . . . 404, 405 
 Ivi. 5 325 
 
 iii 8 . 318 
 
 ii. 1.3 73 
 
 Iviii 401 
 
 iii 16 411 
 
 ii 18 318 
 
 Ix 162 
 
 iii. 19 411 
 
 ii. 23 75 n. 
 
 Ix. 8 162 
 
 v 411 
 
 iii. 24 124 
 
 Ixi. 12 .... 408 
 
 v 1 . 318 
 
 iii. 24 ff. . . . 149 n 
 
 Ixii 374 
 
 v. 5 84 
 
 iv. 6 249 
 
 Ixiii 374 
 
 vi. 18, 19 ... 100 
 vii.-ix 278 
 
 v. 2, 3 .... 124 
 vi 68, 357 . 
 
 Ixix. . . . 160, 357 n. 
 Ixxii.-cv. . . 203 n. 
 
 vii. 22 ... 60, 297 
 vii. 23 .... 297 
 vii 26 . 60 118 n. 
 
 vii. . 68, 128, 357 n. 
 vii. 9, 14, 23 . . 393 
 x. 29, 30. ... 124 
 
 Ixxxiv. 4 ... 324 
 Ixxxix. 40 ... 398 
 xc 357 n. 
 
 vii. 26, 27 ... 101 
 viii. . . . 182 n. 
 
 xii. 40 .... 77 n. 
 xiv. 15 .... 318 
 
 xc. 9, 37 .... 65 
 xc. 16-38 . . . 323 
 
 viii. 19, 20 ... 219 
 ix. 1 105 
 
 xv. 12-16 ... 124 
 xv. 13-15 ... 330 
 
 xc. 20 .... 324 
 
 xc. 20-27, 33 . . 324 
 
 ix. 17, 18 ... 279 
 xi. 24-26 ... 60 
 xii. 1 92 
 
 xv. 36 .... 57 
 Jubilees i 327 
 iv 160 n. 
 
 xc. 24, 25 ... 404 
 xc. 26 . . . 404 
 xc. 29 .... 408 
 
 xiv. 3 .... 79 
 xvi.-xix. . . . 127 
 xvi. 7 .... 80 
 xvi 12 27 . . 105 
 
 As'mpt. of Moses x. 327 
 Enoch i. -xxxvi. . 203 n. 
 i. . . 324, 398, 398 n. 
 i 4 .... 324 
 
 xc. 33 .... 401 
 xci 374 
 cii 411 
 ciii 411 
 
 xvi. 26 .... 84 
 Ecclu<< i 4 9 15 . 100 
 
 vi. 6 . . . . 160 n. 
 viii 143 
 
 Sib. Or. iii. 36-62 . 325 
 iii. 56 .... 357 n. 
 
 xi. 1-20 .... 100 
 xvii. 1 .... 205 
 xix. 13-17 ... 294 
 xxiii 1 84 
 
 ix 143 
 
 x. . 143, 160. 401, 404 
 x. 6, 14 . . . . 404 
 xxii 411 
 
 iii. 558 ... 361 n. 
 iii. 652-794 ... 322 
 iii. 669 ff. . . 357 n. 
 Pss. of Sol. i.-xviii. 357 n. 
 
 xxiii. 29 .... 294 
 xxiv . . 100 
 
 xxii. 11 .... 324 
 xxvii. 2 .... 404 
 
 ii. 30, 31 . . . . 67 
 xvii 325 
 
 xxv. 24 .... 205 
 

 
 INDEX OF CITATIONS, 
 
 441 
 
 NEW TESTAMENT. 
 
 Matt ii 
 
 Page 
 . . . 329 
 
 Matt xiii. 2430 
 
 Page 
 348 n 
 
 Mark vi 33 34 
 
 Page 
 
 AK 4.01) 
 
 
 ... 333 
 
 xiii. 37-43 . 
 
 . 348 n 
 
 vii 5 9 13 
 
 295 
 
 iii. 5-7 . 
 iii 9 . . 
 
 ... 337 
 . . . 336 
 
 xiii. 39 . . 
 xiii. 40 
 
 . . 163 
 402 
 
 vii. 10-13 . 
 vii 24 31 
 
 . . 244 
 345 
 
 iii 16 . . 
 
 . . . 94 
 
 
 152 
 
 vii 27 
 
 345 
 
 iv. 1-11 . 
 
 ... 163 
 
 xv. 18 . . 
 
 . . 295 
 
 viii. . . 
 
 . . 358 
 
 iv. 24 . . 
 
 ... 170 
 
 xv. 19 20 . 
 
 207 
 
 viii 12 
 
 179 
 
 V. 
 
 ... 418 
 
 xv 24 
 
 83 
 
 viii 27 30 
 
 354 
 
 v 12 
 
 ... 410 
 
 xvi. 13 14 
 
 . . 329 
 
 viii 29 
 
 3 'SO 
 
 v. 16 
 
 ... 295 
 
 xvi 17 
 
 177 350 
 
 viii 31 i 
 
 52 354 n 
 
 v. 17-19 . 
 v. 2L-32 . 
 v. 22 . . 
 
 231, 266, 267 
 ... 295 
 ... 406 
 
 xvi. 18 . . 
 xvi. 24 . . 
 xvi. 26 . . 
 
 . . 348 
 . . 295 
 . . 178 
 
 viii. 38 . . 
 ix. 1 . . . 
 ix 12 . . 
 
 356, 357 
 356. 357 
 352 
 
 v. 33-37 . 
 v. 38-48 . 
 v. 45 . . 
 
 . . . 295 
 ... 295 
 . 269, 418 
 
 xvi. 27 . . 
 xvi. 28 . . 
 xvii. 10, 11 . 
 
 . 83, 423 
 . 423 
 . . 329 
 
 x 
 
 x. 23-31 . . 
 x. 30 . . . 
 
 342, 350 
 . . 83 
 
 . . 402 
 
 v. 48 . . 
 
 . . . 279 
 
 xviii. 10 . . 
 
 151 153 
 
 x 40 
 
 343 
 
 
 ... 80 
 
 xviii. 17 . 
 
 . . 348 
 
 x. 45 . . 
 
 352 
 
 vi. 1 . . 
 
 . 268, 296 
 
 xviii. 18 . 
 
 . 422 
 
 xi 
 
 . . 350 
 
 vi 2 
 
 . . . 295 
 
 
 423 
 
 xi 8 10 
 
 ^u. 
 
 
 ... 295 
 
 xix. . 
 
 . . 342 
 
 xii. 9 ... 
 
 . 336 n 
 
 vi ] 4 . . 
 
 ... 421 
 
 xix. 28 
 
 83 343 
 
 xii 12 
 
 348 n 
 
 vi 15 . . 
 
 ... 268 
 
 
 342 
 
 xii 28 
 
 4.1Q 
 
 vi. 16 . . 
 
 ... 295 
 
 xx. 23 . . 
 
 . 343 
 
 xiii. ... 
 
 399 
 
 vi. 20 . . 
 
 ... 268 
 
 xx. 28 . . 
 
 . 420 
 
 
 350 
 
 vi. 23 . . 
 
 ... 268 
 
 xxi. 23-32 . 
 
 . 335 
 
 xiv 12 16 . 
 
 419 
 
 vi. 33 . . 
 
 . 340, 343 
 
 xxii. . 
 
 . 392 
 
 xiv 24 . . 
 
 . . 420 
 
 vii. 11 . 
 vii. 12 . 
 vii. 17, 18, 
 vii. 21 
 
 ... 211 
 ... 295 
 20 . . 211 
 
 ... 402 
 
 xxii. 23 . . . 
 xxii. 30 . . 
 xxii. 31, 32 . . 
 
 . 253 
 152, 402 
 . 394 
 . 392 
 
 xiv. 62 . . 
 xv. 1-20 . 
 xvi. 2-5 . . 
 Luke iii. . 
 
 . . 350 
 . . 344 
 . . 423 
 . . 333 
 
 vii. 22, 23 
 
 . . 356 n. 
 
 xxiii. 2, 3 . 
 
 231, 266 
 
 iii. 22. . . 
 
 . -. 94 
 
 
 ... 266 
 
 xxiii. 3 . . . 
 
 . 268 
 
 vi. 24 ... 
 
 . 295 n 
 
 viii. 5 ff. 
 viii. 11 . 
 viii 12 
 
 ... 86 
 . 346, 402 
 . . 346 
 
 xxiv. . . 360, 
 xxiv. 20 . . . 
 xxiv. 26-28 
 
 399, 402 
 361 n. 
 361 n. 
 
 vii. 35 . . 
 viii. 55 . . 
 ix. 20 ... 
 
 . . 102 
 . . 178 
 . . 350 
 
 viii 2D 
 
 170 405 
 
 xxiv. 30 . . . 
 
 361 n. 
 
 x. 16 . . . 
 
 . . 422 
 
 ix. 14. . 
 
 . . . 335 
 
 xxiv. 37-51 . 
 
 361 . 
 
 x. 18 . . . 
 
 160, 163 
 
 x 5 6 . 
 
 345 418 
 
 xxv. . . 394, 
 
 399, 402 
 
 xii. 8 ... 
 
 . . 152 
 
 x. 20 . . 
 
 . . . 94 
 
 xxv. 31-46 . . 
 
 . 356 
 
 xiii. 3 . . 
 
 . . 206 
 
 x. 28 . . 
 
 . . . 177 
 
 xxv. 31 . . . 
 
 . 152 
 
 xiii. 16 . . 
 
 . . 163 
 
 x 39 . . 
 
 . 178 
 
 xxv. 41 .. 
 
 152, 163 
 
 xiii. 29 . . 
 
 . 409 n. 
 
 x. 41 . . 
 
 . . . 423 
 
 xxv. 46 . . . 
 
 . 407 
 
 xv. 10 . . 
 
 . . 152 
 
 
 335 
 
 xxvi. 17 . . . 
 
 . 266 
 
 xvi. . . . 
 
 . . 411 
 
 xi. 3, 10, 11 
 xi. 7-19 . 
 xi 19. . 
 
 . . 329 
 . 335, 339 
 . . . 102 
 
 xxviii. 19 95, 
 xxviii. 20 . . 
 
 349, 423 
 . 423 
 . 333 
 
 xvi. 19-31 . 
 xvi. 22 . . 
 xvi. 23 . . 
 
 . . 406 
 152, 409 
 . . 406 
 
 xi 23 
 
 . . . 406 
 
 i. 4 15 . . . 
 
 . 230 
 
 xvii. 14 . 
 
 . . 231 
 
 xi. 25-30 
 
 xii 5 7 
 
 . . . 422 
 232 
 
 i. 10, 11 . . . 
 i. 44 . . . . 
 
 335 n. 
 . 419 
 
 xx. 3, 31 . 
 xx. 36 . . 
 
 . . 163 
 152 153 
 
 xii 7 
 
 . . . 264 
 
 ii. 6 . . . . 
 
 . 421 
 
 xxi. . . . 
 
 360, 399 
 
 xii 24-32 
 xii 24 
 
 . . . 95 
 163 171 
 
 ii. 10, 28 ... 
 iii. 35 . . . . 
 
 . 354 
 . 421 
 
 xxii. 32 . . 
 xxiii. 43 . 
 
 . . 273 
 
 409 
 
 xii. 26 . 
 xii. 31 . 
 xii. 32 . 
 xii. 33 34 
 
 . . . 163 
 . . . 83 
 
 . . . 402 
 . . . 207 
 
 iv. 11 . . . . 
 iv. 15 . . . . 
 iv. 26-29 . . 
 v. 9 .... 
 
 347 n. 
 . 163 
 348 n. 
 . 17) 
 
 xxiv. . 350 
 xxiv. 17, 21 
 xxiv. 19-21 
 xxiv. 37-39 
 
 , 358, 423 
 . . 418 
 . . 422 
 . . 178 
 
 
 . . 360, 394 
 
 v. 21-23 . . . 
 
 . 422 
 
 xxiv. 45 . . 
 
 . . 179 
 
 xiii 11 
 
 347 n 
 
 v. 36 . . . . 
 
 . 421 
 
 John i. 4, 5 . 
 
 . . 216 
 
 xiii. 19 . 
 
 . 178 
 
 vi. 17-29 
 
 . 333 
 
 i. 9 
 
 . 284
 
 442 
 
 INDEX OF CITATIONS. 
 
 John i. 10 . 
 i. 14 . . 
 
 Page 
 ... 218 
 ... 177 
 
 Page 
 Acts xii. 15 ... 153 
 xii. 23 .... 152 
 xv 367 
 xvi. 16 .... 171 
 xvii. 28 .... 85 
 xvii. 30, 31 ... 412 
 xix. 1-7 . . . 334 n. 
 xix. 3 335 
 
 1 Cor. i. 23 
 i. 24 . . 
 
 Page 
 ... 420 
 . . . 118 
 
 i. 18 . . 
 i. 29 . . 
 ii. 11 . . 
 
 ... 115 
 ... 283 
 . . . 125 
 
 i. 24, 30 . 
 i. 29 . . 
 
 ... 102 
 ... 177 
 
 i. 30 . . 
 ii. 10-13 . 
 ii. 16 . . 
 
 . 419, 429 
 ... 93 
 
 . . . 179 
 
 ii. 12-17 . 
 iii. 3 . . 
 
 ... 284 
 ... 284 
 
 iii. 3, 5 . 
 
 ... 284 
 
 iii. 16 . . 
 iii. 23 . . 
 iv 20 
 
 . 182, 279 
 ... 429 
 402 
 
 iii. 6 . . 
 
 . . . 284 
 
 xix. 13-16 
 xxi. 20-26 
 xxiii. 6-8 
 xxiii. 8 . 
 xxiii. 9 . 
 Rom. i. . . 
 
 ... 171 
 ... 232 
 ... 419 
 ... 253 
 ... 152 
 . 242 n 358 
 
 iii. 16 . . 
 
 . . . 283 
 
 iii. 19 . . 
 
 . . 83 216 
 
 v. 3-10 . 
 v. 5 . . 
 
 ... 179 
 . . 1 63 
 
 iii. 21 . . 
 
 ... 284 
 
 iv. 2 . . 
 
 ... 348 
 
 v. 7 . . 
 
 . . 118 
 
 iv. 22 . . 
 iv. 24 . . 
 
 . 285 w., 346 
 ... 88 
 
 vi. 2, 3 . 
 vi 3 
 
 ... 406 
 153 
 
 i. 3 . . 
 
 117 
 
 iv. 25 . . 
 
 . . . 333 
 
 i. 3, 4 . . 
 
 ... 429 
 
 viii. 6 . . 
 
 ... 118 
 
 v. ... 
 
 . . . 402 
 
 i. 18-32 . 
 i. 28 . . 
 
 ... 214 
 
 . . 179 
 
 ix 9 
 
 80 
 
 V. 1 . . 
 
 ... 231 
 
 ix. 19-22 
 x. 4 . . 
 x. 20, 21 
 x. 33 . . 
 
 xi. 10 . . 
 
 ... 297 
 ... 129 
 . 155, 171 
 . . . 297 
 . . . 153 
 
 v. 22 . . 
 
 . . . 400 
 
 ii. . . . 
 ii. 1-16 . 
 ii. 5 . . 
 ii. 6-11 . 
 ii. 16 . . 
 iii. 9-19 . 
 iii. 19-31 . 
 
 . . 283 n. 
 ... 394 
 ... 178 
 . 82 
 . 402 w , 429 
 ... 206 
 ... 420 
 . 403 w. 
 
 v 24 
 
 . 283 
 
 v. 27 399 
 v. 28, 29 . . . . 393 
 v. 38-40, 46, 47 . 217 
 vi. 15 344 
 
 xii. 10 
 xii. 14 . 
 
 . . 126 . 
 ... 177 
 . . . 297 
 
 vi. 33-63 
 vi 37 . . 
 
 ... 216 
 
 . . . 2J7 
 
 
 ia 
 
 vi. 44 . . 
 
 ... 217 
 
 iv. 25 . . 
 v. ... 
 
 . 281, 419 
 . . 82 280 
 
 xv. . 274, 393, 402 n. 
 xv. 15 .... 181 
 xv. 19 .... 376 
 xv. 23-28 . . 374 n. 
 xv. 23-28, 51-55 . 362 
 xv 24 .... 400 
 xv. 24-28 . 118, 358 
 xv. 24, 54 ... 164 
 xv. 20, 54 ... 407 
 xv. 28 .... 429 
 xv. 44 .... 395 
 xv. 44, 45 ... 180 
 xv. 51, 52 . 358, 410 
 xvi. 22 . . 376, 396 
 2 Cor. i. 20 ... 429 
 ii. 9 118 
 
 vi. 63 . . 
 
 ... 216 
 
 vii. 27, 31, 
 vii. 49 
 viii. 12 . 
 viii. 24 . 
 viii. 26 . 
 viii. 38-44 
 viii. 39, 40 
 viii. 44 . 
 
 ix. 2, 34 . 
 
 x. 33-36 . 
 xi. 50 . . 
 
 40-42 . 329 
 ... 241 
 ... 216 
 '. . . 412 
 . . . 283 
 ... 218 
 ... 218 
 . 163. 208, 
 218 n. 
 . . 219 n. 
 ... 422 
 ... 420 
 
 v. 12 . . 
 v. 12-21 . 
 vi. . . . 
 vi 5 
 
 . 208, 209 
 . 208, 420 
 . 209, 276 
 
 . 277 
 
 vi. 6 213 
 vi. 8-11 .... 281 
 vii. . 271, 276. 283 n. 
 vii. 9 . . . . 283 n. 
 vii. 10, 14, 24 . 214 n. 
 vii. 18 .... 213 
 vii. 18, 19 ... 213 
 vii. 20. . . 213,214 
 vii. 23, 25 ... IT.-t 
 viii. . . - - - 82 
 
 xii. 20 . 
 xii. 27 . 
 xii. 46 . 
 xiii 2 
 
 ... 86 
 ... 178 
 ... 216 
 178 
 
 
 ... 182 
 
 iii. 17, 18 
 iii. 18. . 
 
 ... 94 
 
 ... 279 
 
 
 ... 280 
 
 xiv. 6 . . 
 
 . . . 216 
 
 viii. 4-8, 9, 
 viii. 7 
 viii. 9 . . 
 viii. 13 . 
 viii. 18-22 
 viii. 19 . 
 viii. 28-30 
 viii. 38 . 
 ix. 5 . . 
 ix. 7, 8 . 
 x. ... 
 x. 10 . . 
 
 16, 27 93 
 . . . 213 
 ... 279 
 . . . 177 
 ... 408 
 . . . 401 
 ... 279 
 ... 153 
 . 177, 429 n. 
 . . 403 n. 
 . 87, 403 n. 
 . . . 178 
 . . . 87 
 
 iv. 4 . . 
 iv. 6 . . 
 
 163, 164, 213 
 . . . 429 
 
 xiv. 16, 17 
 xiv. 30 . 
 xv. 4 . . 
 xv. 18, 19 
 xvi. 7-15 
 xvi. 8 . . 
 
 ... 95 
 . . . 163 
 . . . 283 
 ... 217 
 ... 95 
 . 98-1 
 
 iv. 14 . 
 v. 4-8 . 
 v. 6, 10 . 
 v. 10 . 
 
 v. 19 . . 
 v. 21 . . 
 vi. 12. . 
 xi. 14, 15 
 xii. 1-4 . 
 xii. 2-4 . 
 Gal. i. . . 
 i. 4 118, 
 i. 8 . . 
 i. 11-24 . 
 i. 16 . . 
 
 ... 429 
 ... 410 
 ... 177 
 358, 394, 399, 
 402 ., 429 
 . 277, 429 
 ... 118 
 . . 177 n. 
 ... 152 
 ... 126 
 ... 409 
 . 427, 429 
 232, 402, 429 
 . . 154 n. 
 ... 126 
 ... 177 
 
 xvi. 9 .... 216 
 xvi. 11 . . . 218 n. 
 xvii. 2 .... 177 
 xvii. 9 .... 217 
 Acts i -v. . . .88, 232 
 i.-xii 425 
 ii. 22-24, 32-36 . 422 
 iii 1 93f > 
 
 xi. 25, 26 
 xii 5 
 
 . . 403 n. 
 
 ... 298 
 
 v. 36, 37 . 
 v. 38. 39 . 
 vi 22 
 
 ... 344 
 ... 232 
 129 
 
 xii. 13 . 
 xii. 19, 20 
 xiii. 1 
 xiv. 17 . 
 1 Cor. i. . . 
 
 ... 297 
 . . . 297 
 . . . 178 
 ... 402 
 ... 367 
 
 viii. 26, 29 
 viii. 32, 33 
 
 ... 154 
 ... 280 
 . 366 
 
 
 ... 367 
 
 ii. 7-9 . 
 iii. . . . 
 
 ... 366 
 ... 271 
 
 i. 8 . . 
 
 . . 402 n.
 
 INDEX OF CITATIONS. 
 
 443 
 
 Gal. iii. 2, 3 
 iii. 3 . . 
 
 Pa-e 
 ... 178 
 
 . . . 182 
 
 1 Thess. v. 
 v. 1 11 
 2 Thess. i. 
 
 Page 
 23 . . 181 
 376 
 
 James i. v. 
 
 Page 
 . . . 358 
 
 i. 12, 15 . 
 i. 18, 27 . 
 i 21 
 
 .- . . 207 
 
 ... 270 
 178 
 
 iii. 13 . . 
 
 . . . 41!) 
 
 . . . 399 
 
 iii. 14. . 
 
 ... 94 
 
 
 . 274 
 
 iii. 19. . 
 iii. 27 . . 
 
 . . . 227 
 ... 277 
 
 i. 3-12 
 i. 6-10 
 i. 7 . 
 
 ... 376 
 ... 362 
 . . . 152 
 
 ii. 8 . . 
 
 . . . 297 
 
 ii 10 
 
 243 
 
 iv. 
 iv. 4 . . 
 iv. 6 . . 
 iv. 10, 11 
 v. . . 
 
 271, 278, 307 
 117, 28,), 42;) 
 . . 94, 279 
 . . . 419 
 ... 278 
 
 ii. 19 . 
 
 . . . 170 
 
 i. 7, 8 
 i.8 . 
 ii. . . . 
 1 Tim. i. 8 . 
 
 ... 418 
 ... 396 
 ... 364 
 ... 283 
 
 iii. 6 . . 
 iii. 13 . . 
 
 . 406, 406 n. 
 ... 211 
 
 iii. 17 . . 
 
 iv. 7 . . 
 
 60, 101, 297 
 . . . 163 
 
 v. 17-21 . 
 
 ... 213 
 
 ;. s, 9. . 
 
 ... 212 
 
 iv. 8 . . 
 
 ... 211 
 
 v. 19-21 . 
 v. 24 . . 
 vi. 8 . . 
 vi. 10 . 
 Eph. i. 10 . 
 i. 20-23 . 
 i. 21 . . 
 
 ... 178 
 . 178, 213 
 . . . 213 
 ... 297 
 119, 407, 433 
 . . . 433 
 . . . 154 
 
 i. 15 . . 
 
 ... 283 
 
 iv. 17 . . 
 
 . . . 270 
 
 i. 20 . . 
 
 . . . 163 
 
 v 7 
 
 . . . 376 
 
 ii. 3 . . 
 ii. 5, 6 . 
 ii. 11-13 . 
 ii. 14 . . 
 ii. 14, 15. 
 iv. 10 . . 
 v. 21 . . 
 
 . 283, 434 
 ... 283 
 ... 210 
 163, 208, 210 
 . . 210 n. 
 . . 80, 283 
 ... 152 
 
 v. 7, 8 . 
 v. 8 . . 
 
 . . . 362 
 ... 358 
 
 v. 16 . . 
 
 ... 273 
 
 v. 20 . . 
 1 Pet. i. 3, 19 
 i. 12 . . 
 i. 22 . . 
 
 . 211, 270 
 ... 282 
 ... 153 
 
 . . . 282 
 
 ii. 1-5 . 
 ii. 4 . . 
 
 ... 215 
 
 ... 178 
 
 ii. 7 . . 
 
 . . . 402 
 
 2 Tim. i. 10 
 ii. 11 . . 
 ii. 24-26 . 
 iii. 8 . . 
 
 283, 407, 419 
 . . . 283 
 ... 212 
 . . . 129 
 
 ii. 5, 24 . 
 iii. 13 . . 
 iii. 18-20 
 iii. 21 . . 
 
 ... 282 
 ... 408 
 ... 411 
 . . . 282 
 
 ii. 9, 10 . 
 ii. 11-22 . 
 ii. 13, 16 . 
 ii. 14-19 . 
 iii. . 
 
 ... 282 
 ... 370 
 ... 281 
 . . . 2J8 
 . . . 215 
 
 iii. 15 . . 
 iii. 16 . . 
 
 . . . 283 
 . . . 128 
 
 iv. 1 . . 
 iv. 1, 13 . 
 iv. 5 . . 
 iv 6 
 
 . . . 177 
 ... 282 
 . . 402 w. 
 411 
 
 iii. 10 . . 
 iii. 17 . . 
 
 . 154, 433 
 
 . . . 281 
 
 iv. 1 . . 
 iv. 11 . . 
 
 399, 402 w. 
 . . . 402 
 
 
 . . . 215 
 
 Tit. i. 15 . 
 
 . . . 179 
 
 iv. 7 . . 
 
 ... 358 
 
 iv. 13, 24 
 v. ... 
 
 ... 282 
 . . . 215 
 
 ii. 11-14 . 
 ii. 12 . . 
 
 . 212, 283 
 
 . . . 402 
 
 iv. 7-19 . 
 v 8 . . 
 
 . . . 376 
 . . . 163 
 
 v. 2 . . 
 
 . . . 281 
 
 iii. 4-7 . 
 iii. 5-7 . 
 iii. 8 . . 
 Heb. i. 2 . 
 i. 1-4 . . 
 
 . . . 283 
 ... 212 
 ... 212 
 ... 60 
 . . . 432 
 
 v. 10 . . 
 2 Pet. i. 11 . 
 ii. 4, 17 . 
 iii 13 . . 
 
 . . 402 w. 
 . . 402 n. 
 
 . . 406 n. 
 . . . 401 
 
 vi. 11. . 
 vi. 12. . 
 Phil. i. 6 . 
 i. 6, 10 . 
 i. 21 23 . 
 
 . . . 163 
 ... 154 
 
 . . 402 n. 
 . . 410 . 
 . . . 410 
 
 1 John iv. 17 
 v 10 . . 
 
 . . 402 n. 
 . . . 397 
 
 i. 2, 3 . . 
 ii 4 . . 
 
 . 101, 118 
 . . . 94 
 
 ii. 1 . . 
 ii. 6-9 . 
 iii. 10. . 
 
 . . 177 n. 
 ... 118 
 ... 281 
 
 Jude 6 . . 
 
 . . . 160 
 
 ii 13 . 
 
 . 136 
 
 6, 13 . . 
 9 ... 
 
 . . 406 n. 
 ... 163 
 
 iii. 7 . . 
 
 ... 94 
 
 iii. 20 . . 
 Col. i. 15-20 
 i. 16 . . 
 
 . . 410 n. 
 . . . 433 
 . . . 154 
 
 iv. 12 
 v. 9 . . 
 vi. 1 . 
 
 ... 181 
 . . . 283 
 . . 283 
 
 21 ... 
 
 . . 402 n. 
 
 Rev. i.-xxii. 
 ii 7 . . 
 
 ... 376 
 . . . 409 
 
 i. 20 . . 
 
 ... 407 
 
 vi. 2 . . 
 vi. 4 . . 
 
 . . 402 . 
 ... 94 
 
 ii 23 . . 
 iii. 5 . . 
 
 . 177 ., 399 
 ... 152 
 
 i. 24 . . 
 
 ... 282 
 
 ii. 3 . . 
 
 . . . 102 
 
 vi. 5 . . 
 
 ... 402 
 
 
 . . . 163 
 
 ii. 10. 18 
 ii. 11 . . 
 
 ... 154 
 . . . 178 
 
 vii 10 
 
 . . 177 n. 
 
 
 ... 399 
 
 vii. 25 
 viii. 6 
 ix. 6 . . 
 
 . . . 283 
 . . . 283 
 ... 402 
 
 vi, 9-H . 
 vi. 16 . . 
 ix. 20 . . 
 
 . . . 410 
 ... 399 
 . . . 171 
 
 ii. 13 . . 
 ii. 14 . . 
 
 . . . 215 
 ... 282 
 
 ii. 15 . . 
 . ii. 16-19 . 
 ii. 18 . . 
 
 . 154, 407 
 . . . 433 
 . . 179 
 
 ix 14 . . 
 
 ... 94 
 
 xii. 4, 13 . 
 xii. 19 . 
 
 ... 162 
 . . 152, 163 
 ... 364 
 
 ix. 22 . 
 ix. 27 . . 
 
 ix 28 
 
 ... 227 
 
 . . 402 n. 
 
 40Q 
 
 ii. 20 . . 
 
 . . . 282 
 
 xiii. 18 . 
 xvii. . . 
 
 . . 364 n. 
 ... 364 
 . 3fi4 
 
 ii. 20-33 . 
 iii. 1 3 
 
 . . . 219 
 
 x. 4 230 
 x. 5-10 .... 138 
 x. 23, 36-39 . . 283 
 x. 29 . . - - 91 
 
 iii 1-4 . 
 iii. 4 . . 
 
 . . . 410 
 . . . 407 
 
 xix. . . . 364, 399 
 xix. 13-16 ... 120 
 xx. . 374 n., 399, 402 
 xx. 1-3 . . . . 160 
 xx. 2, 7 . . . . 163 
 xx. 10 . 163, 164, 406 
 xx. 11 .... 399 
 xx. 12 . . 393, 397 
 
 1 Thoss. i v. 
 
 ... 274 
 
 
 . . . 283 
 
 ii. 18 . . 
 iv. . . 
 
 . . . 163 
 . . . 399 
 
 xi. 35 . . 
 xii. 2 . . 
 xii. 2, 3 . 
 xii. 23 . 
 xii. 24 . 
 
 ... 128 
 ... 298 
 . . . 283 
 ... 410 
 ... 283 
 
 iv. 13-18 
 iv. 15-17 
 iv. 17 . . 
 
 ... 376 
 . . . 358 
 . 401, 409
 
 444 
 
 INDEX OF CITATIONS. 
 
 Rev. xx. 13, 14 
 xx. 10, 15 . 
 xx. 21 
 
 406 
 407 
 373 
 
 Page 
 
 Rev. xxi. . . 374 n., 408 
 xxi. 4, 8, 27 . . 407 
 xxi. 14 .. . 407 
 
 Rev. xxii. . . 
 xxii. 5, 11, 15 
 xxii. 11 . 
 
 Page 
 408 
 407 
 411 
 
 PHILO. 
 
 Philo i. 4 . 
 
 . . . 112 
 
 Philo i. 308 
 
 . 109, 111 ( Philo i. 630 . 
 
 . . 112 
 
 .5 . . 
 
 107, 112 
 
 . 414 . . 
 
 ... Ill 
 
 . 653 . 
 
 109 n 
 
 .6 . . 
 
 . 108, 112 
 
 . 415 . . 
 
 . 109, 111 
 
 . 655 . . . 
 
 110, 112 
 
 .7 . . 
 
 . . . 112 
 
 . 427 . . 
 
 108 109 
 
 656 
 
 110 
 
 .8 . . 
 
 . . . 112 
 
 . 441 . . 
 
 128 
 
 684 
 
 109 
 
 . 56 . . 
 
 . . . 101 
 
 . 452 . . 
 
 . . 109 n. 
 
 . 692 . 
 
 128 
 
 . 64 . . 
 
 . . . 206 
 
 . 456 . . 
 
 ... 107 
 
 ii. 28 
 
 108 
 
 . 66 . . 
 
 . . . 112 
 
 . 481 . . 
 
 . . . 206 
 
 ii 46 . . . 
 
 . 107 
 
 . 79 . . 
 
 . 203 ., 205 
 
 . 501 . . 
 
 ... 112 
 
 ii. 154 . . 
 
 . . 110 
 
 . 82 . . 
 
 . . . 107 
 
 . 502 . 
 
 108 109 112 
 
 ii 163 
 
 128 
 
 . 100 . . 
 
 . . . 2u6 
 
 . 505 
 
 107 
 
 ii 385 
 
 102 
 
 . 128 . . 
 
 . . . 112 
 
 511 . 
 
 128 
 
 ii 421-428 
 
 327 
 
 202 . . 
 
 . . . 102 
 
 560 
 
 111 
 
 ii 423 
 
 113 n 
 
 . 207 . . 
 
 . . . 92 
 
 561 . . 
 
 108 111 
 
 ii 435 
 
 327 
 
 . 255 . . 
 
 . . . 92 
 
 . 502 
 
 . . Ill 
 
 ii 436 
 
 113 n 
 
 . 256 . . 
 
 . . . 92 
 
 K25 - 
 
 119 
 
 
 
 
 JOSEPHUS. 
 
 Jos. Ant. i. 1, 
 
 4 . 158 n. Jos. Ant. xv. 
 
 10,5 254,256 Jos. Ant. xviii. 5 
 
 2 234 n. 
 
 xi. 8, 4 . 
 
 . . 55 n. 
 
 xviii. 1, 3 
 
 . . 250 n. 
 
 xx. 9, 1 . . 
 
 . 253 n. 
 
 xiii. 10, 6 
 
 . . . 253 
 
 xviii. 1, 4 
 
 ... 253 
 
 Jos. War. ii. 8, 4 
 
 . . 255 
 
 xiv. 9, 3-5 
 
 . . . 258 
 
 xviii. 1, 6 
 
 ... 258 
 
 vii. 6, 3 . . 
 
 . . 169
 
 INDEX OF SUBJECTS. 
 
 ABADDON, 404 n. 
 
 Abbot, on Rom. ix. 5, 429 n. 
 
 Aboda Sara, 252 n. 
 
 Abraham, in Talmud, 273; faith of, in 
 O. T., 275. 
 
 Abraham's bosom, 409. 
 
 Abyss, of Genesis, 161 n. 
 
 Acfuemenian inscriptions, 391. 
 
 Acts i.-xii., burden of, 425. 
 
 Adam, contrasted with Christ, 18f); fed- 
 eral headship of, 185 n. ; in Ezekiel, 
 195; moral status of, 197; transgres- 
 sion of, in N. T., 208; contrasted with 
 Christ, 209; introducer of sin, 210. 
 
 Aeshma daeva, 150. 
 
 Age, the present, in N. T., 343, 355, 
 402, the coming, in N. T., 343,355, 
 402; change in meaning of, 401. 
 
 Ahriman, 143, 165. 
 
 Ahuratnazda, 164; as judge, 395. 
 
 Alexandre, Sibyl edited by, 66 n. 
 
 Alexandria, religious amalgamation in, 
 43; Jewish colony in, 383; as reli- 
 gious centre, 387, 395 n. ; as centre of 
 logos-doctrine, 432. 
 
 Aliens, prophetic treatment of, 318; in 
 Daniel, 321; in the new dispensation, 
 328, 329. 
 
 Allegorical, exegesis, 138; interpretation 
 of serpent, 203. 
 
 Altruism in N. T., 295. 
 
 Amesha-cpentas, 150. 
 
 Anachronisms in religious progress, 12. 
 
 Anakephalaio>is, 407. 
 
 Ancestor-worship, 143 n. 
 
 Ancient world. See States, ancient. 
 
 Angel of the Lord, perhaps survival of 
 ancient deity, 148; mediating, 228. 
 
 Angel?, origin of, 91; appearances of, in 
 O. T., 149 n.; guardian, of nations, 
 150; position of, in N. T., 152-154; 
 later organization of, 154; fall of, as 
 dogma, not in O. T., 161 ; names of, 
 168; rejection of, ascribed to Saddu- 
 cees, 253 n.; evil, in Enoch, 324; 
 at final judgment, 356; as ignorant of 
 day of parousia, 362 .; evil, judg- 
 ment on, 401; punished, 405; as tor- 
 mentors, 406; as intermediaries be- 
 tween God and man, 433. 
 
 Animals, lower, mortality of, 204 . 
 
 Animistic material, reshaped in N. T., 
 171. 
 
 Annihilation, 411; ascribed to Saddu- 
 cees, 253 n. 
 
 Anthropomorphism in conception of 
 God, 87. 
 
 Anthropomorphisms in Eden-story, 201. 
 
 Anti-Christ, in Paul's writings, 365. 
 
 Antigonus of Socho, 87, 260, 264. 
 
 Antiiiomiaiiism, alleged, of Paul, 275, 
 276. 
 
 Antinomism, Christian, 288. 
 
 Antioch, in Pisidia, 367; in Syria, 367. 
 
 Antiochus Epiphanes, 64, 320, 365 n. 
 
 Apocalypse, germinal, 317. 
 
 Apocalypse, in Svnoptics, 363. 
 
 Apocalypse, the &. 1., conception of di- 
 vine justice in, 82, 83; moral-religious 
 ideas in, 375; changing interpreta- 
 tions of, 376 ; resurrection in, 393, 395 ; 
 final judge in, 399; constitution of, 
 399 n.; whether imputed righteous- 
 ness in, 430. 
 
 Apocalypses, in N. T. times, 361. 
 
 Apocrypha, the, patriotic hope in, 318. 
 
 Apostasy, preceding parousia, 364. 
 
 Apostate Jews, 249, 321. 
 
 Apsu, 162. 
 
 Apuleius on magic, 169 n, 
 
 Arabia, Paul in, 427. 
 
 Aratns, Stoic poet, 85. 
 
 Aristocracy, Sadducean, 253. 
 
 Arrested development, only apparent, 3. 
 
 Asaph, psalm-writer, 136. 
 
 Ascetic view of body, 206 n. 
 
 Asceticism, whether a Jewish concep- 
 tion, 219 n.; Essenian, 255; in Daniel 
 and Tobit, 255. 
 
 Asia Minor, logos-doctrine in, 432. 
 
 Asideans, the, 249. 
 
 Asmodeus, 150, 151, 168. 
 
 Asoka, edicts of, 38; theocracy of, 
 303 n. 
 
 Assimilation of ideas, how limited, 30. 
 
 Assyria, its religious union with Israel 
 anticipated, 314; post-exilian use of, 
 316 n. 
 
 Athenian view of future judgment, 
 395 .
 
 446 
 
 INDEX OF SUBJECTS. 
 
 Atonement, by suffering, 222; day of, 
 226; later Jewish conception of, 
 280 n. ; in Enoch-Parables, 326. 
 
 Avesta, date of, 391. 
 
 Azazel, 145, 160. 163; etymology of, 
 
 BABISM, Messianic faith in, 425 n. 
 
 Babylon, flood-story in, 194; in N. T. 
 Apocalypse, 363; king of, his descent 
 to Shedl, 379. 
 
 Babylonian influence on Jews, 248, 292. 
 
 Babylonians, evil spirits of, 165. 
 
 "Baptist Quarterly," the, 334 n. 
 
 Barnabas, 367. 
 
 Baiir, works of, 337 . 
 
 Beast, in N. T. Apocalypse, 364, 375. 
 
 Beelzebub, 171. 
 
 Bel, Babylonian, 152. 
 
 Berakoth, 247 ., 273. 
 
 Bereshith Rabba, 252 n., 357. 
 
 Bethlehem, birthplace of Messiah, 329, 
 330. 
 
 Blood, seat of life, 174; atonement by, 
 226, 420. 
 
 Body, representative of sinful nature, 
 177 ; pneumatical, 180 ; psychical, 
 180; as seat of evil, 200. 
 
 Bone, expression of physical structure^ 
 174. 
 
 Bowels, seat of compassion, 177 n. 
 
 Brain, not in O. T., 177 n. 
 
 Broadus, "Jesus of Nazareth," 302 n. 
 
 Brotherhood, human, in N. T., 296; Ro- 
 man sense of, 338. 
 
 Budde, " Bibl. Urgeschichte," 205 n. 
 
 Buddhism, foreign influence on, 27; 
 broadening of its constitution. 31; its 
 dogma, 38; birth of. out of Brahmnn- 
 ism, 39; Messianic faitii in, 425 M. 
 
 Bundehesh, the, 375. 
 
 (LESAREA PHILIPPI, 351. 
 
 Calling, prenatal, 326. 
 
 Canaan, restoration to, 311. 
 
 Canaanitish worship, 234. 
 
 Canonization, grounds of, 69, 72. 
 
 Canons, non-Jewish, 68. 
 
 Catholicism, affected by modern thought, 
 435. 
 
 Centralization, Jewish religious, 239. 
 
 Ceremonial. Jewish, moral effect of, 243. 
 
 Chaldeans, in Habakkuk, 310; in Jere- 
 miah and Kzekiel, 311. 
 
 Changes in faith. See Religious revo- 
 lutions. 
 
 Chiliasm, in the Church, 365. 
 
 China, state-religion of, 42. 
 
 Chosen one, the, in Enoch-Parables, 325. 
 
 Christ, contrasted with Adam. 20H; hu- 
 manity of, 280; sufferings of, modified 
 view of, 282 ; reign of, signification 
 of, 377. 
 
 Christ, the, in Psalms of Solomon, 325. 
 
 Christianity, rise of, in conformity with 
 law, 1 ; not obscured in Middle Age, 3; 
 influence of, on barbarians, 4; of to-day 
 not inferior to that of fourth century, 
 5; whether a universal religion, 36; 
 birth of, out of Judaism, 39 ; the world 
 prepared for it, 40; connection of, with 
 civilization, 45; now spreading, 45; 
 unifying power of, 370, 371; perma- 
 nent moral element of, 414; conditions 
 of birth of, 426. 
 
 Church, the, relation of, to religion, 39; 
 takes place of Israel, 126; the Jewish, 
 rise of, 237; the Christian, mechanical 
 nomism in, 245; early Christian, com- 
 posed of Jews, 246; not source of sal- 
 vation, 278 n. ; nomism in, 289; how 
 far cosmopolitan, 298 ; as ethical lever, 
 301; in First Gospel, 348; diversities 
 in, 359; its hope of the Lord's coming, 
 365; partial petrifaction of, 369; in- 
 termingling of Semitic and Hellenic 
 conceptions in, 370; spiritual aim of, 
 377; mission of, 377; in place of Israel, 
 396; passed from Jews to Gentiles, 
 416 ; its coincidence with the syna- 
 gogue, 419; Mosaism in, 424; growth 
 of spirituality in, 428; ethics of, deter- 
 mined by Jesus, 434; creation of 
 Jesus, 435. 
 
 Church government, its relation to 
 social-political ideas, 13. 
 
 Church of England, progress of, 43. 
 
 Church of Rome, progress of, 44. 
 
 Cicero, on divination, 169 n. ; ethical 
 sentiment of, 337. 
 
 Citizenship, Roman, ethical effect of, 298. 
 
 Cleanthes, Stoic poet, 85. 
 
 Code, Deuteronomic, 70 ; Jewish, not 
 abrogated by Jesus, 368. 
 
 Codification, in time of Hillel, 252. 
 
 Colony, the Egyptian-Jewish, 323. 
 
 Colossians, conception of Jesus in, 119; 
 lojros in, 433. 
 
 Coining of Jesus, hope of. 359. 
 
 Commission, the baptismal, late origin 
 of, 345. 
 
 Communal immortality, 385. 
 
 Communism. Essenian, in N. T., 256. 
 
 Communities. See Society. 
 
 Community, ethically constituted Israel- 
 itish, 317. 
 
 Conduct, biblical basis of, 292. 
 
 Conflict, between will and nature, 214; 
 between light and darkness. 216: be- 
 tween world and believers, 216-218. 
 
 Confucius as founder of a religion, 25. 
 
 Conquest of world, O. T. conception of, 
 377. 
 
 Conscience, autocracy of, 15; union with 
 God, 15; how viewed by Jesus, 269. 
 
 Consciousness. See Religious conscious- 
 ness. 
 
 Cosmopolitan spirit, Jewish, 294; pro- 
 phetic, 314. 
 
 Cosmos in Fourth Gospel, 216, 218 n.
 
 INDEX OF SUBJECTS. 
 
 447 
 
 Creation, divine spiritual, 279; spiritual, 
 284; the, as groaning in sin, 401. 
 
 Creation-tablet, Babylonian, 161. 
 
 Criticism, biblical, whether practised in 
 first century, 132. 
 
 Cults, foreign, adoption of, 29. 
 
 Cyrus, his policy toward exiles, 312. 
 
 Cyrenaic philosophy, 386. 
 
 DAIMON, 155 n. 
 
 Daimonion, 155 n. 
 
 Daniel, conception of sin in, 192 n.; no 
 mention of Satan in, 202 ; political 
 element in, 341; "son of man " in, 
 354; judgment in, 357; anti-godly evil 
 in, 3(55 .; resurrection in, 380 n.- 
 Persian influence in, 390 ; partial 
 resurrection in, 392; retribution in, 
 404; intermediate state in, 411. 
 
 Darius and young men, episode of, 56. 
 
 Darmesteter, " Ormazd et Ahriman," 
 172 n.; "The Zend Avesta," 172 n. 
 
 Davidic dynasty, perpetuity of, 315. 
 
 Day of Yahwe, in Malachi," 313. 
 
 Death, expiatory, in Isaiah, 352; pre- 
 mature, as punishment, 382, 404 ; 
 abolition of, in N. T., 407: as end 
 of probation, 411; of Jesus, in N. T., 
 428. 
 
 Debility, moral, in man, 214. 
 
 Decay of societies, cause of, 3 ; only 
 relative, 3, 4. 
 
 Defect, alleged, of ethics of Jesus, 296; 
 of ethics of N. T., 299, 300. 
 
 Defects, ethical, Jewish, 332. 
 
 Deification, of Jesus, Paul's attitude to- 
 ward, 429; of men, whether Semitic, 
 430 n. 
 
 Deities, heathen, late Jewish recognition 
 of, 77, 78. 
 
 Deity, tribal, 306. 
 
 Delifzsch, " Jesus u. Hillel," 205 n. 
 
 Delitzsch, " Wo lag d. Paradies V " 
 306 n., 409 n. 
 
 Demon, 142, 155. 
 
 Demoniacal possession, 1(58, 170. 
 
 Demons, as spirits of the wicked, 169; 
 tormented, 405. 
 
 Dependence on God. ethical ai'd non- 
 ethical, 384. 
 
 Depravity, total, whether in 0. T., 
 190 ff.," 196. 
 
 Destruction, future, sense of, in N. T., 
 406 ., 411. 
 
 Determinism, biblical, 291. 
 
 Deuterofanonical books, 76. 
 
 Deuteronomy, ethicnl effect of, 235; 
 loving obedience in, 245. 
 
 Development, ethical, Jewish, 288. 
 
 Devil. See Satan. 
 
 Dillmann, Enoch- text of, 66 n. 
 
 Disciples of Jesus, their hopes not politi- 
 cal, 345; Messianic hope of, 358. 
 
 Discourses, eschatological, of Jesus, 
 355-360. 
 
 Distress, national, in Psalter, 235. 
 
 Divine_ intervention, two stadia in con- 
 ception of, 121. 
 
 Dogma, unspiritual, power of, 369; as 
 modifying ethics, 397. 
 
 Do,. ma and conduct, complements of the 
 religious sentiment, 20. 
 
 Dogmas, Christian, formulation of, 435. 
 
 Dollinger, "Gentile and Jew," 337 n. 
 
 Dorner, on biblical ethics, 302 n. 
 
 Dragon, in N. T. Apocalvpse, 162, 375; 
 Babylonian, 195, 200 n. 
 
 Driver, in "Studia Biblica," 306 n. 
 
 Drummond, "Jewish Messiah," 66 ., 
 326 n., 330 n. 
 
 Duality of man's constitution, 173. 
 
 Duschak, " Bib.-tal. Glatibenslehre," 
 330 n. 
 
 Duty, filial, casuistical treatment of, 244. 
 
 Dwight, on Rom. ix. 5, 429 n. 
 
 EARTH, the, abode of the new Israel, 
 321; as scene of future life, 401, 402. 
 
 Ecclesiastes, date of, 59; doubts as to 
 canonical character of, 74; provi- 
 dence in, 79; conception of sin in, 
 192 n. 
 
 Ecclesiasticus, date of, 60; second pro- 
 logue to, 73; fatherhood of God in, 
 84; idea of wisdom in, 100; concep- 
 tion of sin in, 192, 205. 
 
 Eden, garden of, 195 n.; whether in 
 N. T., 408. 
 
 Eden-story, central idea of, 198 n. ; 
 whether borrowed bv Jews, 200. 
 
 Edersheim, "Life of Jesus," 329 n. 
 
 Egoism, alleged, biblical, 299. 
 
 Egypt, its religious union with Israel 
 anticipated, 314. 
 
 Egyptian doctrine of bodily resuscita- 
 tion, 390. 
 
 Eg3 r ptian idea of immortality, 387. 
 
 Egyptian influence on Jews, 382, 383, 
 405. 
 
 El, sense of, 317 . 
 
 Elijah, child restored to life by, 175; 
 translation of, 204 n., 390; forerunner 
 of Messiah, 329, 330; as moral re- 
 former, 333 ; model of John, 334. 
 
 Elohim, sons of, 167. 
 
 Elohim-beings, 147, 159, 161, 198. 
 
 Enemies, national, hatred of, 242; O. T. 
 hatred of, opposed by Jesus, 268. 
 
 Enoch, translation of, 204 ., 390. 
 
 Enoch, book of, date and character of, 
 65; whv not canonized, 75, 76; quoted 
 in N. T., 76; Azazel in, 143; angel- 
 ology of, 149, 150, 160, 167, 168; ethi- 
 cal element in, 324 ; " son of man " in, 
 354; earthly consummation in, 356; 
 judgment in, 357, 374; calling of Mes- 
 siah by God in, 357; anti-godly evil 
 in, 365 n.; whether Christian hand in, 
 395 n.; judgment in, 398; Messiah in, 
 398; Israel's future in, 400; retribu-
 
 448 
 
 INDEX OF SUBJECTS. 
 
 tion in, 404; new Jerusalem in, 408; 
 intermediate state in, 410, 411. 
 
 Enoch-Parables, judgment in, 325, 401, 
 404; resurrection in, 393; Messiah in, 
 399; garden of life in, 408. 
 
 Enthusiasm, ethical, in N. T., 294. 
 
 Ephesians, conception of Jesus in, 119 ; 
 logos in, 433. 
 
 Epicureanism, 387. 
 
 Epistles, the, ethics of, 297, 341 ; expec- 
 tation of Jesus in, 358; judgment in, 
 401, 402; immortality in, 402 ; Pastoral, 
 whether imputed righteousness in, 430. 
 
 Eschatology, Jewish, 308; of Gospels, 
 358. 
 
 Essenes, origin of, 219 . ; purity of, 
 333. 
 
 Essenism, whether found in teaching of 
 Jesus, 418. 
 
 Ethan, psaltn-writer, 136. 
 
 Ethical element in Enoch, 324. 
 
 Ethical feeling, Jewish advance in, 396. 
 
 Ethical ideals, formation of, 18. 
 
 Ethical ideas, limited power of, 39. 
 
 Ethical standard, primitive, 2*3. 
 
 Ethic.*, religious sanctions of, 19; Jew- 
 ish, 48; of John Baptist, 336; modi- 
 fied by nationalism, 396. 
 
 Ethics and religion, examples of une- 
 qual co-existent developments of, 18, 
 19. 
 
 Eve, prize offered her by the serpent, 
 203 ; introducer of sin, 210. 
 
 Evil, blotting out of, 407. 
 
 Exaltation, of Jesus, 428, 429. 
 
 Exegesis in N. T , spiritual power of, 
 139 ; basis of truth in, 139. 
 
 Exile, Babylonian, teaching of, 224; 
 worship during, 246 ; influence of, 248. 
 
 Expiation, pre-exilian theory of, 220, 
 221; double view of, 222. 
 
 External ethical standard, difficulties of, 
 239, 240. 
 
 Ezekiel, his description of Eden, 195 n. ; 
 new covenant of, 332; "son of man " 
 in, 353; anti-godly evil in, 365 n. ; his 
 vision of revivification, 389. 
 
 Ezra, turning-point in Jewish history, 
 47 ; and Nehemiah, advent of, 50. 
 
 " FACE OF BAAL," title of Tanit, 89 . 
 
 Faith, view of, in James, 270; transfor- 
 mation by, 276; Paul's conception of, 
 277 ; view of, in Ephesians and Colos- 
 sians, 282; in Hebrews, 283. 
 
 Faith and works, Paul's conjunction of, 
 340. 
 
 Faith in Je<us, after his death, 425. 
 
 Fatherhood of God, 83-86, 269 ; Jesus' 
 treatment of, 86. 
 
 Fetishism, Hebrew, 141. 
 
 Fir-t Gospel, word " church" in, 348. 
 
 Flesh, in O. T., not impure, 174; con- 
 trasted with spirit, 178; hostile to 
 spirit, 213; as seat of sin, 219. 
 
 Flood-story, different recensions of, 
 194 n. 
 
 Fliigel, " Die Sittenlehre Jesus," 302 n. 
 
 Folk-religion, Hebrew, 166. 
 
 Foreign thought, how regarded by Jews, 
 242. 
 
 Formulating period of Christianity. 
 435. 
 
 Fourth Gospel, conception of divine 
 justice in, 83; spirituality of God in, 
 88; idea of divine spirit in, 95; date 
 of, 115 n. ; treatment of Eden-story in, 
 207 ; antithesis of moral power and 
 impotency in, 217; conflict between 
 divine and anti-divine in, 218; pro- 
 logue to, 284; regeneration in, 340; 
 baptism in, 348; resurrection in, 393, 
 395; whether imputed righteousness 
 in, 430. 
 
 Fravashis, 150. 
 
 Frazer, " Totemism," 141 n. 
 
 Freedom, controlled by law, 278 n. 
 
 Friedliinder, " Sittengeschichte Roms," 
 169 n. 
 
 Friedlieb, Sibyl edited by, 66 n. 
 
 Fusion of different elements in Chris- 
 tianity. 370. 
 
 Future life, in Palestinian works, 251 n.; 
 Sadducean view of, 253, 260. 
 
 GALILEE, Greek influence in, 85, 86. 
 
 Gamaliel, 232, 251; speech of, 424. 
 
 Gass on biblical ethics, 302 n. 
 
 Gautama, his relation to Buddhism, 26; 
 to his age, 34. 
 
 Gehenna, 406. 
 
 Geldner, " Zend Avesta," 172 n. 
 
 Gen. iii., object of, 197. 
 
 Gentile influence on hypostasis of spirit, 
 96. 
 
 Gentiles, incoming of, 336 n.; accep- 
 tance of, in prophets, 346 ; attitude of 
 early Church toward, 346; uncircum- 
 cised, received into the Church, 366, 
 367. 
 
 Ginsburg, his edition of Moabite Stone, 
 307 n. 
 
 Glossolaly, 138. 
 
 Gnosticism, whether Jewish in origin, 
 219 n. ; Essenian, 255, 256; Jewish, 
 257, 433; combated in Colossians, 
 257 ; Christian, 257. 
 
 God, help of, need of, 2; identified with 
 ethical ideal, 19, 183; national life 
 regulated by, 238. 
 
 Gods, heathen, in Psalms, 147 n. 
 
 Gog and Magog, 373, 374; in N. T. 
 Apocalvpse, 373. 
 
 Golden Rule, the, 264, 294, 296, 297. 
 
 Goodness, personal, in N. T., 285. 
 
 Gospel, the, preached to Gentiles, 361. 
 
 Government, ideal, 317. 
 
 Gratitude, as ethical factor, 300. 
 
 Gratz, " Geschichte d. Juden," 306 n. 
 
 Greece, victory over, in Zechariah, 314,
 
 INDEX OF SUBJECTS. 
 
 449 
 
 318; in Sibylline Oracles, 322; or- 
 ganized force of, 338. 
 
 Greek influence, on Jews, 108, 248, 262, 
 263, 395; in Jewish schools, 252; on 
 Antigonus, 260; on Christianity, 413. 
 
 Greek oppression of Jews, 319; in 
 Enoch, 323. 
 
 Greek philosophy, its effect on the 
 masses, 301. 
 
 Greeks, the, how regarded by Jews, 242. 
 
 Growth of society, 2; when continu- 
 ous, 4. 
 
 HADES, destruction of, 374; in Theo- 
 poinpus, 391; equivalent to hell, 406. 
 
 Harlez, De, " Des Or'igines du Zoro- 
 astrisme," 150 n., 172 n.; " A vesta," 
 172 n. 
 
 Hasidi.n, the, 249, 321, 323. 
 
 Hatch, " Essays in Bibl. Greek," 180 n. 
 
 Hausrath, "N. T. Times," 246 ., 249 ., 
 337 n. 
 
 Heaven, whether referred to in Ps. xvii., 
 380 n. ; as abode of the righteous, 
 401. 
 
 Hebrew language, ceased to be Jewish 
 vernacular, 136. 
 
 Hebrew vowel-points, 24. 
 
 Hebrews, conception of Jesus in, 118, 
 119; its conception of Christianity, 
 233; whether imputed righteousness 
 in, 430; logos in, 432; faith in, 434. 
 
 Hell, in Enoch-Parables, 393; whether 
 in O. T., 404; in N. T., 406 n.; in 
 Talmud, 412 . 
 
 Hellenism, alleged defeat of, 262; in- 
 fluence of on N. T., 286, 287; in the 
 Church. 370. 
 
 Heinan, psalm-writer, 136. 
 
 Herod the Great, summoned before 
 Sanhedrin, 258 ; conflicts in reign of, 
 331. 
 
 Herodians, the, their effort to entrap 
 Jesus, 344. 
 
 Herodotus, on Persian religion, 391. 
 
 Heroes, antediluvian, 160. 
 
 Herzog, " Heal-Encvclopadie," 246 n., 
 249 n., 302m. 
 
 Hezekiah, Ps. of, 382. 
 
 Hierarchy, angelic, 153. 
 
 High-priest, as representative of logos, 
 109 n ; president of Sanhedrin, 258. 
 
 Hillel, liberality of, 259 n., 328 n. ; teach- 
 ing of, 264-266; moral earnestness of, 
 333 ; moral distinctness of, 338 ; moral 
 e'evation of, 417. 
 
 History, later Jewish literary, character 
 of, 52. 
 
 Hokma, the, ethical character of, 294. 
 
 Holiness, ritualistic, in Zechariah, 315. 
 
 Hope in God, Jewish non-ethical, 308. 
 
 Host of heaven, 161 n. 
 
 Humanity, devotion to, in N. T., 300. 
 
 Hypostasis of spirit, incomplete. 94. 
 
 Hypostatization, arrested, 90, 91. 
 
 IDEAL, religious, of Paul, 277; ethical, 
 Roman, 337. 
 
 Ideas in the air, 29. 
 
 Idolatry, Jewish, late, 77 ; how treated 
 by prophets, 234. 
 
 Idumeans, the, conversion of, 328 n. 
 
 Imagination, Semitic, detective, 383. 
 
 Inimanuel, 317. 
 
 Immer, " Theol. des N. T.", 302 n. 
 
 Immortality, accepted by Pharisees, 251 ; 
 Jewish doctrine of, 319; national, 384, 
 389 ; doctrine of, relation of Jesus to, 
 418. 
 
 Imputation, in 1 Tim., 283; in N. T., 285. 
 
 Imputation of righteousness, 272. 
 
 Incapacity, man's moral, 215. 
 
 Inclination to sin assumed in 0. T., 197. 
 
 Indeterminism, biblical, 291. 
 
 India, whether Jews influenced by, 390. 
 
 Individualism, controlled bv an ideal, 
 278; Jewish advance in, 3*96, 397. 
 
 Individuality, religious, cultivated by 
 synagogue, 247. 
 
 IndVa, as judge, 395. 
 
 Inheritance, ethical, natural, 185. 
 
 Insanity as demoniacal possession, 170. 
 
 Inspiration, its relation to law, 23, 24; 
 Philo's view of, 127, 128 ; N. T. view 
 of, 128, 129. 
 
 Institutions, effect of change in, 4. 
 
 Intercession, human, 273. 
 
 Intermediary, Jewish nation as, 345, 
 346. 
 
 Intermediation, between God and man, 
 Jewish, 421, 431; Persian, 431 .; an- 
 gelic, 433. 
 
 Inward divine law. idea of, 24. 
 
 Isaiah, the exilian, Israel in, 332. 
 
 Isaiah, his denunciation of necromancy, 
 378. 
 
 Ishtar, her descent to Sheol, 382. 
 
 Islam, influenced by Jews and Chris- 
 tians, 27, 28; simplicity of duties of, 
 31; simpl city of doctrines of, 32, 38; 
 birth of, out of old Arabian faith, 39; 
 now spreading, 45 ; attitude of, toward 
 unbelievers, 329 n. 
 
 Isolation, early national, 28; Jewish, 
 242; its ethical effect, 293; done away 
 with by Christianity, 370, 371. 
 
 Israel, a mixed nationality, 10; destiny 
 of, 224 ; prophetic rejection of, 336 n. ; 
 organized force of, 338; superiority of, 
 339 ; as prophet of God, 354. 
 
 JADDUA, 55 n. 
 
 James, its view of faith, 270; opposition 
 to Paul in, 275; indorses Paul, 367; 
 view of Jesus in, 426. 
 
 Jeremiah, ethical principle of, 184; fore- 
 runner of Messiah, 329, 330; new 
 covenant of, 332. 
 
 Jerusalem, in Enoch, 323 ; the new, 324, 
 373 ; destruction of, 361, 363 ; parent 
 church in, 366. 
 
 29
 
 450 
 
 INDEX OF SUBJECTS. 
 
 Jesus, the living, in Paul's system, 281 ; 
 his relation to Jewish nationalism, 
 286; his ethical spirit, 300, 301; his 
 opinion of John Baptist, 335; his faith 
 in Jewish nation, 349 ; his freedom of 
 speech, 351; his subordination to God, 
 358 ; words of, later interpretation 
 of, 358, 359; his simplicitj-, 359; hope 
 of his coming, 359; sobriety of his 
 ideas, 359; source of power "of, 360; 
 coming of, whether defined by him- 
 self, 362; founder of Christianity, 368, 
 369, 435. 
 
 Jewish history, noble figures in, 245. 
 
 Jewish religion, persistence of, 8; in- 
 fluenced by Canaanites, Assyrians, 
 Babylonians, Greeks, 26, 27, 28. 
 
 Jewish religious instinct, 237. 
 
 Jews, in Egypt, 33; in Babylonia, 33; 
 religious isolation of, 235. 236; vitality 
 of, 238 ; faithful to idea of law, 240; 
 their consciousness of enlightenment, 
 241; Egyptian, 251; modern, Messi- 
 anic ideas of, 304 n. ; in Middle Age, 
 305; as borrowers, 388, 392; conver- 
 sion of, to Christianity, in N. T., 403; 
 restoration of, to Palestine, 404. 
 
 Jinn, 142. 
 
 Job, book of, 61 ; whether national, 73 ; 
 description of wisdom in, 98-100 ; 
 date of, 98 ., 157 n.; Satan in, 165; 
 whether immortality in, 381, 385. 
 
 Jodl, "Geschichte d. Ethik,'' 300 n. 
 
 Johannites, influence of, 336. 
 
 John, npostle, indorses Paul, 367. 
 
 John Baptist, disciples of, 334 n., 335; 
 how esteemed by Jesus, 339. 
 
 John, First Epistle of, its agreement with 
 Fourth Gospel, 433. 
 
 John Hyrcanus, I., 65, 323. 
 
 John Hyrcanus II.. 258. 
 
 Josephus, on John, 334 . 
 
 Joshua, priest and governor, 316. 
 
 Jost, "Geschichte," 259 n., 265 n. 
 
 Jubilees, descent of angels in, 160 n. 
 
 Judaism, its dealing with circumcision, 
 31; how related to Hellenism, 203; 
 its severance from Christianity, 288; 
 religious organizing power of, 306; 
 attraction of, for Grwco-Roman world, 
 328 n. 
 
 Judas Maccabseus, 65, 319, 323. 
 
 Judas the Galilean, 258. 
 
 Judgment, of nations in prophets, 314; 
 in Enoch, 324; in Synoptics, 355, 356; 
 in Sermon on Mount, 356 n. ; by 
 God, 357; by Messiah, 357; general, 
 in N. T. Apocalypse, 373; general, 
 in Enoch, 374; future, Egyptian, 382; 
 allied to resurrection, 395. 
 
 Jupiter, as judge, 395. 
 
 Justice, divine, theological factor in, 82; 
 taught by Jesus, 417. 
 
 Justin Martyr, '' Trypho," 330 n. 
 
 Juvenal on magic arts, 169 .; ethical 
 sentiment of, 337. 
 
 KEMOSH, Moftbite devotion to, 305 
 King, Messiah, as, in Synoptics, 343 ; 
 
 in Enoch, 343 n.; of Israel, as judge, 
 
 400. 
 "Kingdom of God," germ of, 321 .; 
 
 significance of, 370. 
 Kingdom of heaven in N. T., 208. 
 Kings, Deuteronomic coloring of, 309 n. 
 Knowledge of God, by believers, 422. 
 Kohut, " Jiidische Angelologie,' 149 n., 
 
 150 n., 172 n. 
 
 Korah, sons of, as psalm-writers, 136. 
 Kuenen, " Rel. of Israel," 249 n., 306 n. 
 
 LANG, "Mvth, Ritual, and Religion," 
 199 n. 
 
 Law, the, turning-point, 47; as factor 
 in Jewish life, 49; its relation to 
 prophecy, 53 ; its acceptance, 70, 71 ; 
 ethical power of, 186; moral feeling 
 in, 226; a civil code, 227; its relation 
 to Christianity, 237; viewed as a 
 whole, 243; slavery to, 244; spiritual 
 element in, 245 ; Pharisaic attitude 
 toward, 250 ; glorification of, in Tal- 
 mud, 252: recognized bv Jesus. 266- 
 268, 419, 421; its great possibilities, 
 266 ; criticised by Jesus, 267 ; in 1 
 Timothy, 283; replaces prophecy, 314; 
 observed by early disciples, 348". 
 
 Law, the oral, character of, 239; atti- 
 tude of Sadducees toward, 253. 
 
 Leadership, individual, 21-26, 34. 
 
 Legalism, extreme, of Essenes, 255. 
 
 Legend, in earlier histories, 55, 56; in 
 Chronicles, 56; in Pentateuch, 56; in 
 Synoptics, 358. 
 
 Lenprmant, " La Magie," 142 n. 
 
 Levitical law. See Law. 
 
 Levitical legislation. See Law. 
 
 Libertv of thought, Pharisaic, 251 ; 
 Christian, 278 n.; civil, in O. T., 322. 
 
 Lichtenberger, " Encyclopedic," 302 . 
 
 Lightfoot, " Colossians," 249 n. 
 
 Life, Christian, of first century, 208; 
 eternal, in Matthew, 356; Christian, 
 how affected by eschatology, 376 , 
 new, on earth, in Daniel, 380 n. ; li-ng, 
 as blessing in O. T., 382; earthly, 
 its hold on the Jew, 389; eternal, 
 on earth, 401; long, as reward, 404; 
 future, Jewish monarchical scheme 
 of, 412. 
 
 Lilit, 142. 
 
 Literature, Babylonian-Assyrian, 382 ; 
 pre-Islamic Arabian, 382; Phoenician, 
 382. 
 
 Liver, as seat of life, 177 n. 
 
 Logos, the, in Philo, 106-114 ; interral 
 and uttered, 110; in Fourth Gospel, 
 115-117, 119, 218 n.; in N. T. Apoca- 
 lypse, 120. 
 
 Love, as moral guide, 278; divine, 
 taught by Jesus, 417. 
 
 Luke, eschatology of, 361 .
 
 INDEX OF SUBJECTS. 
 
 451 
 
 Luth rdt, "Die antike Ethik," etc., 
 302 n. ; " Geschichte d. christl. Ethik," 
 etc., 302 n. 
 
 MACCABEAN STATE, 323. 
 
 Maccabeari war, 240. 
 
 Magic in Roman Empire, 169 ; Essenian, 
 
 256. 
 
 Magism, in Persia, 391. 
 Mahdism, Messianic faith in, 425 n. 
 Maimonides, 252, 288. 
 Man, psychical, 181; pneumatical, 181; 
 moral potency of, 191, 213; primitive, 
 capable of earthly immortality, 204; 
 corrupt nature of,' 211 if.; nature of, 
 in O. T., 212; fall of, 218 n.; his need 
 of power of God, 236; moral autocracy 
 of, 270. 
 
 Man-god, death of, 280 . 
 Manahem the Essene, 254, 256. 
 Manichffiism, failure of, 43. 
 Manuscripts, early, liable to error, 72. 
 Mardoclueus, day of, 57. 
 Marduk, Babyl. "preference for, 305. 
 Mark, Jesus as Messiah in, 350. 
 Martensen on biblical ethics, 302 n. 
 Martincau on biblical ethics, 302 n. 
 Masses, Jewish, not bigoted, 245. 
 Mazdeism, the later, lifelessness of, 38; 
 complicated theology of, 43 ; whether 
 affected by Judaism" and Christianity, 
 375. 
 Mediating power between deity and 
 
 world, 90. 
 
 Mediation, human, 228. 
 Mediatorial scheme, Jewish, 431. 
 Meek, the, 0. T. sense of, 316. 
 Megilloth, 247 n. 
 Mendelssohn, Moses, 288. 
 Mercy of God, 227. 
 
 Messiah, the, whether mentioned by 
 Philo, 113 n.; Ephraimic, 280 n.; rule 
 of, 341 ; popular idea of, 344 ; as sub- 
 ordinate to God, 357; as judge, in 
 Talmud, 357 - ; as ignorant of day 
 of parousia, 362 n. ; end of reign of, 
 374 n. ; as conqueror, 376 ; as king, 
 376; God's vicegerent, 400; person of, 
 idealized, 400. 
 Messianic hope, in Ezra's time, 49, 50; 
 
 ethical development of, 308. 
 Messianic thought, history of, 331. 
 Metaphysics, absence of, among ancient 
 
 Jews, 58 
 
 Metatron, the, 91 n. 
 
 Meyer, " Gesch. d. AKerthums," 172 n. 
 Micaiah, vision of, 144. 
 Michael, angel, 64, 152; as patron of 
 the Jews, 320; as agent of salvation, 
 398. 
 
 Midrash Tanchuma, 252 n. 
 Millennarian tendencies, in the Church, 
 
 365 n. 
 
 Millennium, the, in N. T. Apocalypse, 
 373. 
 
 Mills, "The Zend A vesta," 172 n. 
 Mind, equivalent to spirit, 179. 
 
 Miracles, ascribed to Jesu* in Synoptics, 
 125; in Fourth Gospel, 125; post-bib- 
 lical, 126; of Messiah, 32J, 330. 
 
 Mishna, beginning of, 264. 
 
 Mission of Piiansees, 251. 
 
 Mithra, as mediator, 4-31 n. 
 
 Moabite Stone, 307 n. 
 
 Mohammed, founder of Islam, 26; rep- 
 resented his age, 34; fitted his ideas 
 into the existing system, 40; theoc- 
 racy of, 303 n. 
 
 Monotheism, when established, 47; its 
 nature, 48; effect of, on national char- 
 acter, 78; imperfect, 147 .; Jewish, 
 423. 
 
 Muriil agencies, supernatural, not differ- 
 entiated, 146. 
 
 Moral capability in man, 213. 
 
 Moral codes, origin of, 16-18. 
 
 Moral crises in life, 21, 22. 
 
 Moral earnestness, prophetic, 318. 
 
 Moral ideal, Jewish, 328. 
 
 Moral order, aimed at by the Church, 
 377. 
 
 Morality of Sadducees, 261. 
 
 Morals, pre-prophetic, 184; prophetic, 
 184. 
 
 Moses, his relation to Israelitism, 25. 
 
 Mystery, in teaching of Jesus, 347 n. 
 
 Myth o"f serpent, 198-200. 
 
 Mythologies, Graeco-Roman, decline of 
 338. 
 
 NAKEDNESS, ethical aspect of sense of, 
 
 197 n. 
 "Name of Baal," title of Ashtoreth, 
 
 saw. 
 
 Nathan, parable of, 184 n. 
 
 National consciousness of innocence, 
 189. 
 
 Nationalism, shades of, 249; Pharisaic, 
 250; of Jesus, 268; in Fourth Gos- 
 pel, 284; in Enoch, 324; stress laid 
 on, 328; Jewish, as affecting ethics, 
 396. 
 
 Nations, foreign, their relation to Israel, 
 318. 
 
 Natural law, O. T. idea of, 121, 122. 
 
 Nature, tenderness tor, ascribed to God, 
 80, 81. 
 
 Naxarites, 219 ., 255. 
 
 Nebuchadnezzar, nttitude of prophets 
 toward, 311. 
 
 Necromancy, 142 n. ; opposed by proph- 
 ets, 378. 
 
 Nehemiah, alleged library of, 73. 
 
 Nero, as anti-Christ, 363 ff. ; as man of 
 lawlessness, 364. 
 
 New Testament, claim to inspiration in, 
 129-131. 
 
 Nicolas, " Des Doct. Rel. d. Juifs," 
 172 n. 
 
 Nineveh, in Nahum, 310.
 
 452 
 
 INDEX OF SUBJECTS. 
 
 Nomism, control of conception of sin by, 
 193; two elements in, 237; alleged 
 victory of, 262; of Jesus, 266, 268, 
 269; its need, 266; Jewish, 277; na- 
 tional, 286; and antinomism, 289. 
 
 Non-miraculous view of life in U. T., 
 122, 123. 
 
 Non-resistance in N. T., 256, 257; 
 taught bv Jesus, 267; in Sermon on 
 Mount, 295 . 
 
 OB, 142 n. 
 
 Obedience, inability of, to save, 212. 
 
 Oehler, " O. T. Theology," 302 n. 
 
 Old Testament, idea of divine spirit in, 
 
 92; whether word hypostatized in, 
 
 103, 104; claim to inspiration in, 129; 
 
 N. T. view of, 131, 132; authorship 
 
 of, how decided bv early critics, 132- 
 
 136. 
 
 Omnipotence ascribed to God, 79. 
 Omnipresence ascribed to God, 79. 
 Omniscience ascribed to God, 79. 
 Onias, temple of, 314 n. 
 Oriental religious, whether they affected 
 
 Jews, 257. 
 Organizaiion, Jewish religious, 239, 
 
 240, 241 ; social, its ethical effect, 293 ; 
 
 ethical-religious, 338. 
 Orthodoxy, Mosaic, antagonism of Jesus 
 
 to, 352 ; its antagonism toward Jesus, 
 
 352. 
 Osiris, as judge, 395. 
 
 PALESTINE, as scene of judgment, 398. 
 
 Palingenesis, the, 343. 
 
 Pantheism, not in O. T., 175. 
 
 Parables, of Jesus, resurrection in, 394. 
 
 Paradise, 406, 409. 
 
 Paralyzing effect of cnsuistry. 244 
 
 Parousia, Messianic judicial, 358 ; in 
 N. T., 362; moral effect of expecta- 
 tion of, 363 ; moral power of, 376. 
 
 Parsee religion, persistence of, 8; stag- 
 nation of, 9. 
 
 Parthian invasion of Palestine, 325. 
 
 Particularism, national, 48; national, 
 Jewish, 349. 
 
 Patriots, Jewish exilinn, 312. 
 
 Paul, as interpreter of Jesus, 35, 38; 
 illogical nationalism of, 81: his idea 
 of divine justice, 82 ; his conception 
 of divine spirit, 93; his idea of wis- 
 dom, 102; his conception of Jesus as 
 glorified Messiah, 117, 118 ; his alle- 
 gorical interpretation, 138; treatment 
 of Eden-story by, 207; his doctrine of 
 moral incapacity, 212; assumes good- 
 ness in man's will, 214; affirms man's 
 moral impotency, 214; his picture of 
 the Roman world, 214; his view of 
 nature of Messiah's death, 232 ; puri- 
 fication-offering of, 232; character of 
 Iris thought, 271 ; his attitude toward 
 
 the Messiah, 271, 272; his feeling 
 toward Jewish ordinances, 271; his 
 expectation of Christ's second coming, 
 274; his intuition of the Messiah, 274; 
 his moral earnestne-s, 274; his view 
 of Abraham's faith, 275; his attitude 
 toward ethical principle, 278 .; his 
 view of Christ's humanity, 280; self- 
 adaptation of, 297; ethical influence 
 of, 301; his conjunction of faith and 
 works, 340; as preacher to Gentiles, 
 346; his view of the parousia, 302; 
 his conflict with extreme conserva- 
 tives, 367; his contribution to Chris- 
 tianity, 368 ; his view of Messianic 
 reign, 374 n. ; epistles of, immortality 
 in, 377 ; his view of resurrection, 393, 
 394; his conception of Messianic judg- 
 ment, 399, 400 ; his view of future of 
 Israel, 403 n. ; his view of abolition of 
 death, 407 ; his view of regeneration 
 ot the earth, 408; his view of interme- 
 diate state, 410; non-Jewish element 
 in, 413; as Christian leader, 416; his 
 appeal to Pharisees, 419; his autobi- 
 ography, 427 ; his attitude toward de- 
 ification of Jesus, 429. 
 
 Perfection, human, in Fourth Gospel, 
 285. 
 
 Persian ideas, influence of, 374, 375. 
 
 Persian influence, on Jews, 151, 168, 
 248, 292, 390, 405, 431 n. ; on Chris- 
 tianity, 413. 
 
 Persian"^ ingdom, permanence of, 304. 
 
 Persian religion compared with Jewish, 
 172. 
 
 Persius, ethical sentiment of. 337. 
 
 Person of Jesus, two lines in construc- 
 tion of, 120; idealized, 358. 
 
 Peter, church founded on, 348; protest 
 of, against Messiah's death, 351; re- 
 proved by Jesus, 351; vision of, 366; 
 indorses Paul, 367; his view of Jesus, 
 422. 
 
 PfHderer, "Moral u. Religion," 302 n.; 
 "Religionsphilosophie," 302 n. 
 
 Pharisees, attacked by Jesus, 245; recog- 
 nized by Jesus, 266 ; their doctrine of 
 imputation, 273; under Hasmoneans, 
 325; their aversion to revolt, 331; their 
 fear of Jesus, 344; Jesus intelligible 
 to, 348 n. 
 
 Philo, his conception of divine spirit, 
 92; his conception of wisdom, 101, 
 102; his idea of the logos, 106-114; 
 influence of, on Fourth Gospel, 117; 
 his view of inspiration, 127, 128; 
 makes woman author of sin, 210; 
 " Contemplative Life," 255 n. ; cxeget- 
 ical method of, 388; his relation to 
 Colossians 433. 
 
 Philosophy, Cynical in F.ccles., 59 ; Pla- 
 tonic and Stoic in Wisdom, 60; Jewish, 
 97; Hebrew ethical, 291; Greek scep- 
 tical, 385, 38'i. 
 
 Pilate, his view of Jesus, 344.
 
 INDEX OF SUBJECTS. 
 
 453 
 
 Pirke Abotli, 247 n., 251 n., 259 . 
 
 Plato, ' Apology," 395 n. 
 
 Platoiiism, influence of, on Jews, 97, 
 386, 387. 
 
 Pleroma, in Christ, 407; gnostic, 433. 
 
 Pliny, "Hist. Nat.," 255 n. 
 
 Plutarch, ethical sentiment of, 337; on 
 resurrection, 391. 
 
 Political annihilation and religious 
 growth, 238. 
 
 Political idea, the, in Daniel, 322; in the 
 Sibyl, 323. 
 
 Poor, tlie, technical O. T. sense of, 316. 
 
 Prayer for the dead, 77 n. 
 
 Pre-existence of Messiah in Enoch-Par- 
 ables, 326. 
 
 Prescriptions, as enfeebling spirituality, 
 369. 
 
 Priesthood, of Christ, 283. 
 
 Priesthood, Levitical, perpetuity of, 
 315. 
 
 Priests, conservatism of, 254. 
 
 Primitive idea of animals, 199. 
 
 Prince of this world. 218 n. 
 
 Probation, future, 411. 
 
 Problem of evil, N. T. solution of, 171. 
 
 Prophecies, pre-exilian, 315 n. 
 
 Prophecy, view of, in Zechariah and 
 Joel. 54. 
 
 Prophet, the false, in N. T. Apocalypse, 
 373. 
 
 Prophetic writings, conception of sin in, 
 190. 
 
 Prophets, the, formulators of monothe- 
 ism, 47; their treatment of idolatry, 
 234; interested in the nation as a 
 whole, 236; peculiar to Israel, 238; 
 their conception of covenant, 307; 
 their interpretation of history, 307 ; 
 ethical reproofs of, 332: their view of 
 Jewish nation a-! intermediary, 345; 
 rejection of Israel in, 346: judgment 
 in, 356: nationalism in ethics of, 
 396 n.;. Jerusalem in. 408. 
 
 Proselytism, origin of, 328 n. 
 
 Protestantism, affected bv modern 
 thought, 435. 
 
 Proverbs, date of, 58, 100 n.; old Se- 
 mitic eschatology of. 385. 
 
 Psalm xliv., date of, 189. 
 
 Psalm li., unique conception of sin in, 
 192. 
 
 Psalm cxix., its motive, 240; idea of 
 righteousness in, 208. 
 
 Psalms, liabylonian. penitential, 382. 
 
 Psalms, the, date of, 61 ; providence in, 
 80; conception of sin in, 186 if.; 
 whether immortality in, 380, 381. 
 
 Psalms of Solomon, judgment in, 357; 
 Messiah in, 398 ; Israel's future in, 400. 
 
 Psychological questions suggested by 
 Eden-story, 198. 
 
 Ptolemy Euergetes, 60 n. 
 
 Ptolemy Physcon, 60 n. 
 
 Public worship of Ezra's time, effect of, 
 48. 
 
 Punishment, eternal, in Matthew, 356. 
 Purgatorial suffering, 411, 412. 
 Purification, national, preached by John 
 
 Baptist, 333. 
 Purim, 57. 
 
 RABBIS, their attitude toward Greek 
 study, 251. 
 
 Ransom, Jesus as, 352, 353. 
 
 Rechabites, the, 219 n., 255. 
 
 Reconciliation of man to God, 222, 407. 
 
 Records, Jewish, antiquity of, 241. 
 
 'Records of the Past," 307 n. 
 
 Redemption, national, in Philo, 327; 
 popular hope of, 327. 
 
 Reform of John Baptist, value of, 335,336. 
 
 Reformation, moral, of Jesus, 339. 
 
 Reformers, not always understood by 
 contemporaries, 35. 
 
 Regeneration, ethical, as held by Jesns, 
 340; in Fourth Gospel, 340;' of hu- 
 manity, taught by Jesus, 377; social, 
 era of, 401: of external world, 408; in 
 future liie, 412. 
 
 Religion, a branch of sociology, 1; so- 
 cial character of, 1 ; product of national 
 thought, 7 ; dependent on social or- 
 ganization, 8 ; tends to coalesce with 
 ethics, 19 ; and ethics, difference in 
 their points of view, 20; absolute 
 power of. on what dependent, 21; 
 practical power of, on what dependent, 
 21 ; force in propagation of, 32 ; the ab- 
 solutely universal, 86 ; how dependent 
 on organization, 39 ; effect of slavish 
 nomism on, 244 ; influence of syna- 
 gogues on, 247; Israelitish, embraced 
 by aliens, 318. 
 
 Religions, barbarous, history of, 44. 
 
 Religions that have perished, 7. 
 
 Religious cause of failure, 5. 
 
 Religious consciousness defined, 1. 
 
 Religious decay only seeming, 5. 
 
 Religious discoveries, liberating effect 
 of, 24, 25. 
 
 Religious gatherings in Malachi, 246. 
 
 Religious ideas, gradual victory of, 33. 
 
 Religious influence, international, extent 
 of, 26. 
 
 Religious life, later Jewish, activity of, 
 248. 
 
 Religious necessity of growth, 2, 5, 6. 
 
 Religious progress marked by flows and 
 ebbs, 21; from less to more general, 
 30. 
 
 Religious revolutions, how accom- 
 plished, 6. 
 
 Religious sects, danger of narrowness, 6. 
 
 Religious sentiment, its content deter- 
 mined by science and ethics, 20. 
 
 Religious thinkers, when influential, 6. 
 
 Religious thought, diverse tendencies of, 
 192 n. 
 
 Religions vigor, relative to size of com- 
 munity, 5.
 
 454 
 
 INDEX OF SUBJECTS. 
 
 Religiousness, ethical and non-ethical, 
 384 . 
 
 Henan, "History of Israel," 306 n. ; 
 " L'Antechrist,"" 364 . 
 
 Renegades, in Enoch, 324. 
 
 Repentance, prophetic doctrine o f , 221. 
 
 Restoration, the, religious struggle of, 
 313. 
 
 Resurrection, accepted bv Pharisees, 
 251; of Jesus, 280, 358; in Daniel, 
 320 ; as contained in immortality, 
 394 n. 
 
 Retaliation, opposed by Jesus, 267. 
 
 Retribution, divine, in N. T., 407. 
 
 Retrogression. See Decay. 
 
 Revelation, received bv Paul, 427. 
 
 Reward, divine, in O.'T., 261. 
 
 Rewards, promised by Jesus, 343. 
 
 Righteous, the, 82; in Daniel, 321, 322. 
 
 Righteousness, consciousness of, in 
 Psalms, 188; of Christ, 209; prophetic 
 conception of, 235; twofold source of, 
 236; later Jewish idea of, 243; nomis- 
 tic definition of, 244; Jesus' concep- 
 tion of, 268, 269; transference of, 272; 
 as held by Jesus and Paul, 281; in 
 Fourth Gospel, 283-285; ethical, 287; 
 and prosperity. 309 , prophetic, 318; 
 national, consciousness of, 332 ; hu- 
 man, as condition of salvation, 421; 
 exaltation of, 429. 
 
 Ritual, expression of dogma, 20; de- 
 basing tendency of, 186 ; elaboration 
 of, 230; organization of, 313 ; Egyp- 
 tian, 382. 
 
 Roman empire, magic in, 169; ethicai 
 progress in, 337; as persecutor, 363 ; 
 destruction of, in N. T. Apocalvpse, 
 364, 373. 
 
 Roman religion of first century, iifeless- 
 ness of, 38. 
 
 Roman world, Paul's picture of, 214. 
 
 Rome, organized force of, 338. 
 
 Roth, on Persian eschatology, 375 n. 
 
 Royal law, the, 297. 
 
 SABATIER, on N. T. Apocalyps 375 n. 
 
 Sabbath, the, observed by Christians, 
 361 n. 
 
 Sacerdotal system of N. T., 48. 
 
 Sacrifice, vicarious element in, 226; out- 
 ward, insufficiency of, 230; Essen ian 
 hostility to, 255,256 ; Messianic, 280 ; 
 of Christ, in Fourth Gospel, 283 ; of 
 Christ, high conception in, 290 ; of 
 Jesus, in N. T., 428. 
 
 Sadducees, failure of, 261; under Has- 
 monenns, 325; aversion of, to revolt, 
 331; reject resurrection. 392. 
 
 Saints, the, in Daniel, 320, 321; reign 
 of. 362, 374 ; as judges of the wicked, 
 406. 
 
 Sa'ir, 142, 145. 
 
 Salter. "Ethical Religion." 302 n. 
 
 Salvation, not in church, 278 .; super- 
 
 natural, 279; advance in intensity of, 
 methods of, 290 ; through king, 316 ff. ; 
 held to be of Jews, 346 ; how defined 
 by Jesus, 418; as reward of obedience 
 to the law, 425. 
 
 Samuel, Deuteronomic coloring of, 309 n. 
 
 Sassanians, the, theocracy ">f, 303 n. 
 
 Satan, as angel of light, 152; identifica- 
 tion of, with serpent, 158, 202; his fall 
 from heaven, 160; in Enoch, 163; 
 identification of, with Azazel, 203 n. ; 
 blinding power of, 213; in N. T. 
 Apocalvpse, 373 ; imprisonment of, 
 374. 
 
 Satisfaction in God, earthlv, in 0. T., 
 379 ff. 
 
 Scepticism, religious, among early Jews, 
 53; Sadducean, 253; Semitic, 390. 
 
 Schneckenbiirger, on baptism of John, 
 334 n. 
 
 Schodde, Enoch, translation of, 66 n., 
 326 n. 
 
 Schools, legal, 231; Jewish, Greek in- 
 fluence in. 252. 
 
 Schultz, "Alttestamentl. Theol.," 302 n. 
 
 Schiirer, " Geschichte," 66 n., 246 ., 
 249 n., 263 n., 326 n., 330 n., 337 n. 
 
 Science, as handmaid of religion, 15. 
 
 Scientific views of N. T. times, 360. 
 
 Scion, royal, 316. 
 
 Scribes, early, qualifications of, 72 ; as 
 leaders of .legal study, 259; doctrinal 
 studies of, 319 ; concurrence of Jesus 
 with, 419. 
 
 Scriptures, public reading of, 247. 
 
 Second coming of Christ, 274. 
 
 Second Maccabees, judgment in, 357. 
 
 Sects. See Religious sects. 
 
 Seeley, "Ecce Homo," 302 n. 
 
 Self-abandonment, as ethical factor, 300. 
 
 Self-culture, moral, obligation of, 299. 
 
 Semitic and Hellenic ideas, united in 
 Christianity, 370. 
 
 Semitism, in the Church, 370. 
 
 Semyaza, 160. 
 
 Seneca, ethical sentiment of, 337. 
 
 Sensual pleasure, serpent symbol of, 
 203 n. 
 
 Separateness, social, of early Christians, 
 297. 
 
 Sermon on Mount, no mention of divine 
 spirit in, 94 ; whether Essenism in, 
 256, 257; ethics of, 294-296; content 
 of, 340 ; judgment in, 356, 396; heaven 
 in, 409. 
 
 Serpent, the. in Genesis, 158, 195 ; pun- 
 ishment of, 197: animal nature of, 
 199 ; allegorically interpreted, 203. 
 
 Servant of Yahwe', 225 ; suffering of, 
 352. 
 
 Seven Brothers, storv of, in 2 Maccabees, 
 393. 
 
 Shabbath, 259 . 
 
 Shades, the. consultation of, 378. 
 
 Shamash, as judge, 395. 
 
 Shammai, severity of, 259 n., 264.
 
 INDEX OF SUBJECTS. 
 
 455 
 
 Shekina, the, 90 n. 
 
 ttheol, negative character of, 204 ; ex- 
 istence in, 378 ; as motive for present 
 life, 381; in O. T., 381; in Enoch- 
 Parables, 393 ; whether moral dis- 
 tinctions in, 404 ; whether Paradise 
 in, 409. 
 
 Sibylline Oracles, why not canonized, 
 75 ; earthly consummation in, 350 ; 
 judgment in, 357 ; Israel's future in. 
 400. 
 
 Simon the Just, 247 n., 259, 264. 
 
 Simplicity of Jesus, 359. 
 
 Sin, primitive view of, 183 ; religious 
 and ethical sides of consciousness of, 
 187; O. T. view of nature of, 190; 
 idea of, how controlled by nomism, 
 193; in O. T. forefathers, 193 ; in O. 
 T., whether nature or tendency, 193 ; 
 origin of, in O. T., 193 ft'. ; initial act 
 of, 196 ; universality of, in N. T., 206; 
 beginning of, in N. T., 208; N. T. 
 conception of, 220 ; ethical escape 
 from, 222 ; relation of suffering to, 
 223-226 ; inward, 227 : sense of, de- 
 veloped by the law, 227 ; in Fourth 
 Gospel, 284. 
 
 Sinai, as scene of judgment. 398 n. 
 
 Sinfulness, not bodily, 174. 
 
 Sins of ignorance, 22*6. 
 
 Smith, " Diet, of Bible," 409 n. 
 
 Smith, " Religion of the Semites," 
 141 n. 
 
 Society, see Decay, Growth: apparent 
 stagnation of, 3; ethical organization 
 of, 338; perfect, conception of, 300. 
 
 Soc. of Bibl. Lit. and Exeg., Journal of, 
 429 n. 
 
 Soferim, the, 259. 
 
 Solidarity, ethical principle, 184, 185; 
 national, 272; national, period of, 
 315. 
 
 Solomon, perhaps author of proverbs. 
 58. 
 
 " Son of God," whether claim to super- 
 human nature in, 422. 
 
 Son of man, in Daniel, 320 ; coming of, 
 361 ; as Lord of angels, 423. 
 
 Son of Yahwe, as epithet of king, 317. 
 
 Song of Songs, doubts as to canonical 
 authority of, 74. 
 
 Song of Three Children, 273. 
 
 Sonship, spiritual, 270. 
 
 Sophistrv, moral, exposed by Jesus, 
 340. 
 
 Soul, the, limits of development, 2 ; 
 equivalent to person, 175; used for 
 dead body, 175; equivalent to life, 
 178 ; and spirit, difference between, 
 181; of Adam, 181; of Christ, 181; 
 Christian view of, 182; schism in, 
 213; direct appeal of, to God. 230; 
 death of, ascribed to Sadducees, 253 n. 
 
 Spiegel, " Eranische Alterthumskunde," 
 150 ., 172. 
 
 Spirit, whether hypostatized in Bible, 
 
 92-96; the divine, Philo's conception 
 of, 92 ; Paul's conception of, 93 ; Tal- 
 mudic conception of, 93 n.; use of, by 
 Augustan writers, 182 n. ; hostile to 
 flesh, 213; holy, John Baptist's refer- 
 ence to, 334 n. 
 
 Spirits, guardian, Persian, 151 ; evil, 
 Persian, 155; goud, no organization 
 of, in Bible, 170. 
 
 Spiritualitv in Judaism, 245, 265; of 
 Paul, 276; of Jesus, 342, 355, 418; 
 as suggesting immortalrv, 384. 
 
 Stade, "Geschichte Israels," 306 ., 
 307 n. 
 
 Stagnation, social, 3. 
 
 States, ancient, cause of ruin of, 3. 
 
 Stoicism, career of, 41; not a popular re- 
 ligion, 41; idea of spirituality of God 
 in, 88, 89; influence of, on Jews, 97, 
 886; influence of, on Philo, 112, 114; 
 trace of, in Fourth Gos-pel, 218 n. ; 
 Pharisaic, 252; in Palestine, 260; ill 
 Antigonus, 261. 
 
 Storm and stress, period of, 236. 
 
 Subordination of woman, 210. 
 
 Succa, 273. 
 
 Suffering, question of, 166; vicarious, 
 166 ; atonement by, 222, 353 : national, 
 ethical training of, 309; Jewish, re- 
 ligious effect of, 319 ; as leading to 
 triumph, 352. 
 
 Suffering Messiah in Talmud, 330 n. 
 
 Sun-worship, Essenian, 256. 
 
 Supernatural, the, in history of Messiah, 
 360. 
 
 Sympathy, in N. T. ethics, 300. 
 
 Synagogue, the, religious effect of, 87, 88. 
 
 Synagogue, the great, 135, 246. 
 
 Synagogues, 231 . 
 
 Syncretism in ancient pantheons, 10; in 
 Islam, Christianity, Judaism, 11. 
 
 Synoptics, the, divine justice in, 83; 
 fatherhood of God in, 84; idea of di- 
 vine spirit in, 94 ; idea of wisdom in, 
 102; baptism in. 348; Messianic an- 
 nouncement in, 350 ; final judgment 
 in, 355, 356; judgment by Jesus in, 
 355, 356; date of, 358; eschatology 
 of, 360; apocalypse in, 363; resurrec- 
 tion in, 393, 394; Messiah as judge in, 
 399; signs of Messiah's appearance in, 
 402; faith in Jesus in, 421. 
 
 Syria, Paul in, 427. 
 
 Syrophcenician woman, the, 345. 
 
 TABU, its relation to ethics, 16 n. 
 
 Talmud, the, hypostalizing tendency in, 
 90 n., 91 w.,'93 n. ; its use of Ol T., 
 137; magic in, 142; angels in. 149; 
 demons in, 169; fusion of civil ai:d 
 religious codes in, 237; detailed pre- 
 scriptions of, 243; imputation in, 273; 
 pre-existence of Messiah in, 326; suf- 
 fering Messiah in, 330 .; calling 
 of Messiah bv God in, 357; Messiah
 
 456 
 
 INDEX OF SUBJECTS. 
 
 as judge in, 357; Gog and Magog in, 
 374 n.; resurrection in, 394 ; national- 
 ism in, 396; future probation in, 412. 
 
 Tares, parable of, 348 n. 
 
 Targum of Jonathan, 280. 
 
 Targums, the, suffering Messiah in, 330 . 
 
 Tartarus, 406 n. 
 
 Teaching of Jesus, whether esoteric, 
 347. 
 
 Temple-service, ethical aspect of, 190. 
 
 Temptation in Eden, 195 ff. 
 
 Tenderness, ethicnl, of Jesus, 301. 
 
 Theocratic idea. non-Jewish, 303. 
 
 Theol. Jahresbericht, 302 . 
 
 Theopompus, on resurrection, 391. 
 
 Therapeutic, the, 255 n. 
 
 Tiamat, 152, 158, 162, 200 n. 
 
 Tigris-valley, as Persian centre, 392. 
 
 Timothy, Jirst Epistle to, faith in, 434. 
 
 Tobit, book of, evil spirit in, 168; 
 conception of sin in, 192 n. 
 
 Tora. See Law. 
 
 Torment, future, whether in 0. T., 379. 
 
 TutemUm, Hebrew, 141 n. 
 
 Toy, "Quotations," 163 n.; on prose- 
 lyte-baptism, 334 n. 
 
 Tradition, as interpreter of Jesus, 359. 
 
 Transformation, moral, in N. T., 285. 
 
 Translation, origin of idea of, 204 n. 
 
 Transmigration of souls, 390. 
 
 Tree of life, 201, 205 n. 
 
 Trichotomy, not in Bible, 180-182. 
 
 Tylor, " Primitive Culture," 199 n. 
 
 UNBELIEF, the sin of the world, 218- 
 
 Underworld, the, in O. T., 381 ; Baby- 
 lonian, 882. 
 
 Unity, geographical, as condition of 
 spread of a religion, 37 ; earlv Jewish, 
 308 ; ethical, Roman, 337 ; effected by 
 Christianity, 371. 
 
 Universality," prophetic religious, 313, 
 314 ; of Jewish national aim, 319; at- 
 tempted, of John Baptist, 336 ; of 
 membership, in the Church, 366. 
 
 Uprisings, Jewish, 344. 
 
 VERNES, " Hist, des Ide"es Mess.," 
 335 . 
 
 Vicarious righteousness, 273-275. 
 
 Vicarious suffering, 223; relation of 
 Jesus to, 420. 
 
 Virtue, Anligonus' view of, 260. 
 
 Vischer, on N. T. Apocalypse, 375 n. 
 
 Vision, prophetic and apocalyptic, 63. 
 
 Visions, apocalyptic, historical interpre- 
 tations of, 376. 
 
 WAKBUKTON, "Divine Leg. cf Moses/' 
 382 . 
 
 Water as male and female, 162 n. 
 
 Wayikra Kabba, 252 n. 
 
 Weber, " Svstem," 91 ., 93 n., 142 n., 
 149 n., 161 n., 169 ., 108 ., 252 n., 
 273 n., 280 n., 326 n., 329 n., 330 n., 
 357 n., 363 n,. 374 n., 394. 399, 409. 
 
 Weiss, " N. T. Theol.," 302 n. 
 
 Wellhausen, " Pharisiier u. Sadduciier," 
 249 n.; "Hist, of Israel," 308 . 
 
 Wicked, the, 82. 
 
 Will, human, how viewed by Paul, 214; 
 ethical power of, 222. 
 
 Winer, "Reiil-Woiterbuch," 249 n. 
 
 Wisdom, pre-Christian Jewish concep- 
 tion of, 385, 386. 
 
 Wisdom-books, moral position of, 327. 
 
 Wisdom of Solomon, classic character 
 of, 52; religious tone of, 60; provi- 
 dence in, 79, 80; fatherhood of God 
 in, 84; man's relation to God in, 87; 
 idea of divine spirit in, 92; idea of 
 wisdom in, 100; personification of 
 word in, 105, 106; conception of sin 
 in, 192, 205; view of body in, 219; 
 atonement for sin in, 231; immortality 
 in, 251; wisdom a divine ideal in, 
 278; salvation in, 279 ; immortality 
 in, 378 ; ethical progress in, 397; eth- 
 ical-religious elevation of, 417. 
 
 Witchcraft, 171. 
 
 Wogue, "Histoire de la Bible," 132 n. 
 
 Woman, subordination of, to man, 153 ; 
 role assigned to, by Hebrews, 210 n. 
 
 World, deadness of, 216; moral corrup- 
 tion of, 218. 
 
 World-religion, announced by Jesus, 
 349. 
 
 XENOPHON, "Anabasis," 409 n. 
 
 YAIIWE. name, abandonment of, 32; 
 Jewish loyalty to, 305 ; his covenant 
 with Israel, 306, 307; as judge, 397, 
 398. 
 
 Yahwe-cult, origin of, 306 n. 
 
 ZADOK, 260 n. 
 
 Zadokites, 254 n. 
 
 Zechariah, Satan of, 167. 
 
 Zeller, on Greek philosophy, 387 n. 
 
 Zerubbabel, Davidic prince, 316. 
 
 Zeus, as judge, 395. 
 
 Zoroaster, his relation to Mazdeism, 25. 
 
 Zoroastrian resurrection, 394..
 
 BnBflBB