- GIFT OF MICHAEL REESE &.<• //{ s 2~ . g — 2^? ^fe-v DANTE & HIS TIME DANTE PORTRAIT BY GIOTTO FROM THE FRESCO IN THE BARGELLO, FLORENCE. REPRODUCED BY PERMISSION OF G. GROTES VERLAG. BERLIN. DANTE ftp HIS TIME BY KARL FEDERN WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY A. J. BUTLER AND ILLUSTRATIONS LONDON WILLIAM HEINEMANN 190 RFFSE This Edition enjoys Copyright in all Countries signatory to the Berne Treaty^ and is not to be imported into the United States oj America TO MY DEAR FRIEND EDWARD FALCK THIS VERSION OF MY BOOK IS DEDICATED INTRODUCTION The vogue which the study of Dante enjoys at the present time is a phenomenon somewhat difficult to explain. It is not part of any general interest in the Italian language and literature; which, in England at all events, still suffer under " the deplorable and barbarous neglect " perceived and lamented by Mr. Gladstone a quarter of a century ago. The immense interval, unparalleled in other literatures, by which Dante surpasses all other craftsmen in his mother tongue may perhaps to some extent explain this concen- tration of interest upon him ; but it is no doubt mainly due to the way in which, as I have elsewhere said, he fills the stream of history from side to side. Follow almost what line you will of historical investigation, you will not carry it back into the Middle Ages without finding him upon it. I take down from my shelves books as various in subject as Humboldt's " Cosmos," Whewell's "History of the Inductive Sciences," Bryce's "Holy Roman Empire," Ueberweg's "History of Philosophy"; in the index of each I find the name of Dante Alighieri. Thus he is, of all the great poets of the world, the one who viii INTRODUCTION takes most explaining; the one, it may almost be said, who most appeals to that love of solving problems and diving into mysteries which is with many people a motive nearly as strong as the passive enjoyment of poetical beauty. You never feel sure that you have got to the bottom of what a French writer has called " les replis de son genie" This again sets him in a different class from all the most eminent of his successors. Allegory in Petrarch does not go beyond an occasional play on a proper name ; nor does one look for mysticism in Ariosto. Whether or not this consideration may be held to account at least in part for the popularity enjoyed by Dante, alone among Italian writers, in the taste of the present generation, it undoubtedly explains the immense mass of literature which has grown up around him, and to which recent years have contributed not less than their fair proportion. Dante affords exercise alike to the minute student who delights in tracing literary and personal allusions to their source, in verifying details of chronology, in philological and linguistic inquiries ; to the student of theology and politics; to the philosopher, the man of science, the historian; even to writers with fluent pens and a turn for pious sentimentalism, or exposition of the obvious. So much indeed is written about Dante that is clearly superfluous, that one is in some danger of forget- ting how much work yet remains to be done. No adequate edition, for example, existed till quite recently of any of the minor works; and though Messrs. Wicksteed and INTRODUCTION ix Gardiner have just supplied this deficiency in the case of the Latin Eclogues, these, however interesting in them- selves, represent the smallest fraction of Dante's sub- ordinate writings. Professor Pio Rajna has dealt effectively with the text of the " de Vulgari Eloquentia," and it may be hoped that his explanatory comment will before long see the light and prove a worthy companion to his textual labours. But the " Convito," the " de Monarchia," the lyrical poems, all urgently demand for both text and matter the thorough and scholarly treatment which, if they had chanced to have been composed a thousand years earlier, they would in all probability have long ago en- joyed. Another lack which has certainly been apparent in England is that of some biographical account of Dante which should present him not merely in relation to the actual time in which he lived, or even to the history of his own city, but to the course of general European history, of which the political, social, and religious position of affairs in his time was the outcome. A good deal of light has been thrown on all these points by recent research ; of which, again, the results have been made accessible by such books as Signor Villari's H I Primi due Secoli della Storia di Firenze " and Dr. Davidsohn's " Geschichte von Florenz." A handy popular summary of what would be to Dante the past history of Christen- dom, giving in brief outline the sequence of political events in Church and State, the progress of speculative thought x INTRODUCTION and learning, the development of social conditions, with special reference to the transformation wrought in all these departments by the substitution of German for . Latin hegemony — no better aid than this could be offered to the student who desired to look out on Dante's world so far as possible with Dante's eyes. Yet if he wanted anything of this sort, it was hard to say where, in English at all events, he was to find it ; and he has all the more reason to be grateful to Dr. Federn for thus attending to his needs, after supplying those of his own countrymen. . For it must be observed that the present volume is no / mere translation, but a revised issue by the author himself in a foreign tongue of a work originally composed in his own. Every one must congratulate him in his easy command of an unwonted medium, and on the excellent results he has succeeded in producing in it. It would be too much to say that all Dr. Federn's state- ments and inferences will command the unqualified assent of every " Dante-Forscher." The present writer would be prepared, if this were the place, to pick several crows with him. His views on the Beatrice question are perhaps not thoroughly convincing. But he is always reasonable; as far removed from the extravagant in- credulity of some recent writers as from the unsupported imaginings that were indulged by an earlier school. He realises the essential grandeur of the Middle Ages with their daring speculation, their revival of interest in beauty of form and in the literary expression of reflection and INTRODUCTION xi emotion, their robustness of thought and action. He indicates clearly, if briefly, the true questions at issue between the political parties in Italy, which had such important consequences for Dante; and points out the inadequacy of the old notion, still to some extent current, that Guelfs were in any sense either representatives of Italian patriotism or defenders of the rights of the Church. When he comes to the division of his book which deals more immediately with Dante's personal record, we find the same sobriety of judgment, the same reluctance to overturn long-accepted opinions, so long as they do not involve a physical impossibility or conflict with well- attested facts, the same effort to put himself at Dante's point of view — a very different one, it may be remarked, from that of the average respectable person, the Monna Berta and Ser Martino, of contemporary society. He goes, perhaps, a little further than is necessary in distrust of Boccaccio; forgetting, it would seem, that any state- ments made by Boccaccio must have quickly come to the knowledge of scores of people who were well acquainted with the facts, and that neither his disciple Benvenuto nor any one else gives the least hint of any contradiction having been given to them. On the other hand, Dr. Federn lets us continue to believe in the authenticity of the traditional portraits, which attempts have been made to discredit. He accepts what may be called the Canon of Dante's writings, without any of that shallow scep- ticism, usually based on imperfect knowledge, by which xii INTRODUCTION sciolists seek notoriety. His book will be all the more acceptable to English and American students, among whom such vagaries have seldom found much favour. Another point with which Dr. Federn seems to me to deal more satisfactorily than most biographers of Dante is that of the phases through which his intellectual and still more his spiritual nature had to pass, " before the author of the ' New Life ' could become the poet of the 4 Divine Comedy.' w He dismisses Witte's famous theory (which, indeed, few would now be found to support) that these two works with the " Convito " form a u trilogy " in which Dante's passage from the simple faith of childhood through a period of doubt to the reasoned belief of maturer years, is set forth ; on the ground that we have no evidence that Dante was ever anything but a devout Christian. But he realises that a great revulsion did at some time take place in him ; without which, indeed, the great scene of confession and contrition at the end of the " Purgatory " is unintelligible. And, though he does not use the term, he is clearly aware that this was of the nature of what, in the language of one religious school, is called conversion or conviction of sin. There is no reason that a person in order to undergo this experience should be conscious of any unusual depravity ; and there is no need to suppose that the words put by Dante into the mouth of Beatrice on the occasion in question are meant to imply anything of the kind. Chapter V. of the second part of this book makes it plain that Dr. Federn is on the INTRODUCTION xiii right track in regard to this subject, a due understanding of which will prevent many misconceptions. For instance, no one who has grasped its full significance will ever be misled by the theories, so dishonouring to Dante, which would involve him in discreditable love-affairs at Lucca, in the Casentino, or elsewhere, after the supposed date of his vision. No two readers come to Dante with just the same eyes ; and when the readers are of different nations the chance that one will see what the other might miss is at least doubled. For this reason alone an attempt like this of Dr. Federn's would deserve a welcome ; but I hope that I have said enough to show that its claims to our considera- tion are based on something more than the mere ad- vantage to be derived from the comparison of various points of view. It has substantive merits of its own ; and no English student of Dante will regret having given it his hospitality. ARTHUR JOHN BUTLER. April IQ02. PREFACE In the "Deutsche Rundschau" Hermann Grimm has elaborated the thought that only four poets belong truly to the literature of the world : Homer, Dante, Shake- speare, and Goethe. Of these Dante, though standing nearer to us than Homer by twenty centuries, is the least known. Nor is this to be wondered at. He him- self, in the second canto of the Paradise, warned the readers of his own time, who were not fully equipped up to his level, with the words : O ye who follow me in little boat On this my voyage, eager still to hear, Behind my ship that sings as she doth float, Turn now and look where yet your shores appear ; Into the wide sea put not out, lest ye, Losing me, should have nought whereby to steer. Where my course lies, none yet has roamed the sea! To us his work is the most mysterious of a time that loved mystery. It is founded on ideas and conceptions of the world which for the most part have vanished completely from the life of modern men. All the many allusions to contemporary events, all the innumerable names, which made the book appear richer and livelier to the mediaeval reader, are for us, who do not know the XVI PREFACE names nor understand the allusions, so many obstacles and dead passages, which weigh upon and disturb the reader ; while a commentary is deterrent. " In Dante's poem," said Carlyle, "ten silent Christian centuries have found a voice." One must know these centuries in order to understand the poem. Dante is the Poet of the Middle Ages. But the latest flowers and the ripest fruits betoken the rise of a new generation ; Dante is also the poet of the early Renaissance. We must know the remarkable men of this remarkable time, one must know what occupied them, how they looked upon the world and lived in it, what were their aims and what ways they took to carry them out, what they thought and believed, learned and taught, what seemed of importance to them in their lives ; what happened in their world ; its movements, its great struggles, its petty interests. We should know their towns, their houses and streets, the garments they wore, should know how they slept and what they ate, how they solemnised wedding and funerals. We must follow them to their halls and assemblies, to the churches, where they worshipped with their fellows, to the cells, whither they fled from the world. In the following book I have tried to give briefly a few lifelike pictures of all this ; pictures which I drew from my studies of Dante, especially from the documents of his own time, its chronicles, poems, and images — pictures which 1 saw as I read Dante. These I have tried to give as concisely as possible. To the reader who knows them, the things which occu- pied Dante will appear matters of course, and even if he should miss a name or not know an event alluded to in his works, he will conceive the meaning as well as we understand allusions in our daily papers and books to PREFACE x™ events and matters foreign to us, from their connection with the world that we know. The second part of my book follows Dante's path through that dim and distant world which to us is but half-illuminated — the path of his life, which is the road to his works. In this manner the second part will be a subjective reflection of the first. My object has not been to give the fruits of original research or critical discussions of doubtful matters. Especially in the first part I have mostly worked out the results of other people's investigation. Yet I hope to have given some new points of view. I wish to express my debt to Dr. Robert Davidsohn of Florence, who had the kindness to revise a portion of my book and to give me some valuable data out of his new investi- gations of Florentine history ; I am likewise indebted to Lieut.-Col. Paul Pochhammer of Berlin for kindly revising other parts of the book, and I wish to express my thanks to the English friends who have assisted me in the translation of this edition. My work will not lead into the last depths of the poet and will but indicate his riches. Though whole libraries could be filled with the books written on him, they have not exhausted his abundance. All the treasures of beauty and the most wonderful of his mysteries the reader must look for in Dante's own work. Inadequate translations have been a greater obstacle to this than the enigmas of the poem. Much more than ponderous commentaries, the stiff structure of our translations has kept Dante a stranger to us. Beauty of sound and the power of feeling conquer the reader, and mysteries and scholasticism are borne forward on the music of the verse. But no trans- lation will ever do justice to Dante's works. Dante himself xviii PREFACE says in the " Banquet " : " Therefore let everybody know, that nothing that is brought (or made) to harmonise irt the musical bonds of verse can be translated out of one language into another without all its harmony and sweet- ness being broken." And Shelley wrote five hundred years later in his " Defence of Poetry " : " It were as wise to cast a violet into a crucible that you might discover the formal principle of its colour and odour as seek to transfuse from one language into another the ora- tions of a poet. The plant must spring again from its seed, or it will bear no flower — and this is the burthen of the curse of Babel." CONTENTS PART I THE TIME CHAP. PAGE I. The Destruction of the Antique!; ... 3 ^11. The New Moral Ideal 10 fSllt, The Political Ideal . . . . . .22 IV. The Combat between Church and State . . 30 V. The Hohenstaufen 41 ^ VI. Social Conditions 58 VII. Mediaeval Knowledge 74 VIII. Scholasticism 92 IX. The Universities 108 X. The Provencals . . . . . . .114 XI. Italian Poetry 126 XII. The Franciscans 136 XIII. Florence 153 xx CONTENTS PART II DANTE CHAP. PAGE I. The Work of Dante 179 II. Dante's Youth 195 III. Beatrice 204 IV. Dante and Florence 232 V. Dante in Exile . . 250 VI. The "Divine Comedy" 265 ILLUSTRATIONS Portrait by Giotto— from the fresco in the Bargello, Florence. Drawing by Seymour Kirkup, made before the Restoration in 1848, reproduced by permission of G. Grote's Verlag, Berlin Frontispiece Portrait by Andrea Orcagna—from "The Last Judgment" fresco in the Capella Strozzi in the Church of Sta. Maria Novella, Florence, executed about the year 1350 ; this por- trait was discovered by Mr. Jaques Mesnil in 1901, and is reproduced from a photograph by Brogi . . To face page 70 Portrait by Andrea del Castagno—from the fresco in the Convent of Sta. Apollonia, Florence, executed about 1450, reproduced from a photograph by Alinari . . . .To face page 142 Bronze by unknown artist, probably of the Sixteenth Century — Original in the Museum at Naples, reproduced from a photograph by Brogi To face page 212 Mask, in the Uffizi, Florence, reproduced from a photograph by Brogi To face page 280 PART I THE TIME CHAPTER I THE DESTRUCTION OF THE ANTIQUE The period of history which is called the Middle Ages opens with the spread of Christendom, the decay of the Roman Empire, and the entrance of the German race on the scene of history. • These three elements, different in their origin, but inter- woven in their course and connected in their effects, filled the time from the fourth to the ninth century. The German tribes conquered one province of the empire after the other and Germanised them to a certain extent ; they formed the stock of their aristocracy — in almost all lands of Europe the oldest families have German names — they brought with them a new political system, the feudal system, and on the remnants of the old empire of the Romans arose the feudal states of Europe. Secondly, the old empire as well as the new kingdoms was permeated and deeply influenced by the Christian religion, which changed the inward, life of men and things as thoroughly as the German conquest changed their outward state. At the same time the new religion, born on oriental soil and founded on oriental ideas, underwent in its turn a thorough transformation when planted in the soil of a new race. And in the midst of all these tremendous revolutions, 4 DANTE AND HIS TIME which changed the face of the earth, the remnants of the old empire, the remnants of antique civilisation and of the Latin race continued to exist, and never ceased to have a powerful influence on the minds and customs of men. But weightier almost in its consequences than the fact itself was the form in which the diffusion of the Germans took place. From the middle of the fourth until the eighth century the empire was exposed to an unceasing stream of German invasions, and each of them brought fire and devastation and horrible cruelty into the invaded country. These wild warriors, to whom ° death on the straw " seemed the most shameful end for a man, who, if they could not fall in battle, cut " runes " into their own neck and breast, and expired singing songs of joy and triumph, while their blood streamed down their bodies, were, of course, wholly insensible to the pains of others. The Franks especially were cruel and brutal to a degree which is impossible to describe. More terrible yet were the Huns, whom the Germans themselves believed to be children of evil spirits and unclean women. These cen- turies, which for the middle and the north of Europe were the fermentation and first dawn of a new era, were for the populations of the civilised old countries a prolonged death-torment. There had been misery enough in the social state of the empire, everywhere the people were impoverished, the extortion of taxes had to be performed by ever more cunning methods, want and famine were such, that in most provinces it was a common thing to expose a great number of the new-born children. Now the misery was enhanced by direct physical torture at the hands of savages, acute suffering aggravating the chronic pain ; and the continual devastation, the murderous wars, r THE DESTRUCTION OF THE ANTIQUE 5 the custom of torturing prisoners, which, in spite of the opposition of Christian teachers, continued until the latest , times of the Middle Ages— in the east of Europe even until the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries — all this had the effect that never and nowhere was suicide so frequent as in the decaying Roman Empire. All the letters of the Fathers of the Church, all the histories of the time are full of misery. Woefully characteristic is the expression of a bishop in Gaul, who tells how the citizens of the towns still continued to amuse themselves and laugh and applaud in the circus and in the theatres, and who writes : M It is as if the Roman people had eaten the herbs of Sardinia, and were forced to break out into a disease of laughter — * moritur et ridet ! ' It laughs and dies." We need only consider how much culture was destroyed and lost ; we need but recall to our mind the magnificence of Imperial Rome, the city which contained more public works of art than all great capitals of the world together contain to-day, and in which there stood two thousand palaces and four thousand monuments of great Romans alone, and compare it with the heap of ruins which was left of it in the Middle Ages, At the time of Trajan, Rome had a million and a half of inhabitants, in the fifth century half a million, after the Gothic wars five thousand — and as if history wanted to point at the dreary chasm which separated the new time of Italy from the old — in. the year 546, when Totila, the King of the Goths, left it, Rome stood for forty days perfectly deserted and void ! The Germans had hardly begun to settle when Mohamme- danism began to spread, and the inroads of the Saracens destroyed what had scarce begun to recover. Italy was more exposed to them than any other country. In the year 846, at the time of Pope Sergius II., they sacked the 6 DANTE AND HIS TIME treasures of St. Peter and Paul. To this day may be seen in Italy, especially in the south, the remnants of the castles and watch-towers which were erected against them everywhere along the coast. From the north the Norman pirates rushed in, on the Seine they went up as far as Paris, their Viking-ships sailed through the Straits of Gibraltar and plundered the Italian shore. From the east the Magyars rode far into France and Upper Italy. At first the peoples had nothing to oppose to them but despair ; even the Germans seemed to have lost their warlike spirit ; " coupled together like beasts," the chronicler tells, M those who were not killed were driven away." Thus the devastation went on unceasingly from the end of the third to the middle of the tenth century. Who may count the number of burned cities, of destroyed convents and libraries ? Only this destruction of seven hundred years can explain the utter savageness of the Middle Ages on the very soil of antique glory. We need but think of what had existed before and what remained. Of all the rich Greek literature almost nothing was left. Of the hundred dramas of Sophocles, but seven have come down to our time ; of the seventy tragedies of Aeschylos we have also but seven ; of the lyric poets we have but poor fragments, single verses, almost no whole poem. Of the numberless great phi- losophers, the works of two only have been preserved in a more or less complete state ; of the immense scientific literature, almost nothing has reached us ; of the many historians, perhaps half a dozen ; of Greek painting, almost nothing ; of architecture and sculpture, the poor shattered remnants which still are the chief glory of our galleries. And yet these remnants, these hints of what had been. THE DESTRUCTION OF THE ANTIQUE 7 regenerated Europe in the fourteenth century, give us half of our culture to-day; thousands of people in every country not only owe to them the best part of their educa- tion, but earn their living by studying them and impart- ing their knowledge to others. We may gather from the vital force of these remnants how abundant and glorious must have been the full treasures of antiquity. One may well shudder at the thought of such an immense destruc- tion, and understand that there are people who tremble for our own civilisation, and who say : u Nothing is so swift as decay." Let us once more glance backwards at Imperial Rome. Statistical tables of the fourth and fifth centuries tell us that in Rome were 423 temples, 154 images of the gods, made of gold and ivory, 2 colossal statues, 22 great equestrian statues, 3785 monuments of emperors and great Romans, 1352 fountains and basins, all works of art; of theatres, the largest had 22,888 seats, while the Circus Maximus had 385,000 seats. It may give some idea of these dimensions to the reader when I say, that in this circus the whole population of Bristol could sit to the last infant, and then there would be still room for free entry for all the inhabitants of Great Yarmouth ! We can but dimly conceive what an immense quantity of works of art the 2000 palaces of Rome contained. But one point is essential ; in ancient Rome there were 867 public bath-houses — Modern Vienna, the capital of Austria, has but 57. If the use of soap and water is a sign of civilisation, how far beneath the old Romans are we Europeans of to-day ! In the time when those tables were drawn up, all this was but the fossilised and dilapidated integument of the antique life of yore ; but one or two centuries earlier the 8 DANTE AND HIS TIME pulse of life which had created all this was still beating, and all the shores of the Mediterranean Sea, Italy, Spain, Greece, Gaul, Asia Minor, Egypt, and Syria, all the empire from Portugal to the Black Sea, were covered with gleaming white cities, which, if not equal to Rome, still were all resplendent of antique art, cities some of which had half a million of inhabitants, trade and manufacture flourishing in all, art and science cultivated everywhere, with numerous universities, and houses full of comfort and adorned by an art which ours, in spite of all our improvement in appliances, has not surpassed. Of course much could be said against/ that culture, much could be said of its inward rottenness and decay — of its being founded on slavery and cruel exploitation — but here I speak of what was performed. And now let us turn our eyes to a mediaeval city. We must not think of its picturesque aspect. . Disorder often looks more picturesque than order, and, compared with the bad taste of our present architecture, mediaeval build- ings may be regarded as a romantic ideal. But if we speak of the state of life and civilisation in those cities, we can but consider the contrast to the antique time when they knew how to unite beauty with perfect usefulness. The first thing which would strike us would be the in- credible dirt. u Le moyen age," Taine says, " a vecu sur un fumier."* No pavement, deepest mire, no sewage, all filth thrown into the streets — the consequence was an incessant stench pervading all things. The windows were small and few as possible, the rooms dark, the floors covered mostly with straw, the furniture scanty and badly * That is a peculiarity on which the tales of chivalry do not like to dwell. Nobody can get a true notion of those times out of novels like those of Walter Scott — they are all painted theatre costumes. The THE DESTRUCTION OF THE ANTIQUE 9 shaped. Add to this the ugly attire which resembled sacks, the dirtiness of the inhabitants themselves, and more than this, their brutality and ignorance, and the perfect inability to imitate any natural form. The existing remnants of art of the first centuries of our era are clumsier and more unnatural than the stiff forms of Egyptian or Assyrian art. The limitless deterioration is plainly visible. Slaughter and devastation had swept away the ancient civilisation, and men began with toil and pain to render our planet again habitable. dirtiness of those proud knights would be unbearable to us. Ivanhoe, Marmion, Douglas, and Graeme all objected to washing. There is a Spanish love-song, in which the knight sings : You are more white, my mistress, Than the purest ray of sun, But seven years have passed, yea seven, Since I last put down my arms, My body's become blacker Than the blackest coal. As late as the sixteenth century Queen Marguerite of Navarre, the celebrated story-teller, showed her hands in the Tuileries, to prove how beautiful they were, and added proudly, " Bien que je ne les aie decrassees depuis huit jours. " CHAPTER II THE NEW MORAL IDEAL These are the results of the great and terrible movement in outward life. The inner life of mediaeval men was dominated and impregnated by the Christian religion, whose effects on the culture of the epoch were more important than that of any other influence. In religious times and books the rise of Christendom, its appearance in the world, is defined as the central event in the history of civilisation. But while it is clear that an orthodox person must see the culminating-point of history, as regards religion, in the appearance and the spreading of the true faith, the historian's task is to investigate impar- tially the effects which this great event had on the life and customs of men. Religious people will see simply an immense advance from antiquity. This opinion, of course, was the ruling one in the Middle Ages. Virgil, the repre- sentative of antique wisdom, can lead Dante only through two realms; the third and highest, that of Heaven, is closed to him. The men of antiquity were all lost and doomed to Hell, the men of the new era were Christians, that is to say, redeemed. The opinion of Abelard, who asserted that virtuous heathens, and especially a great number of philosophers, were admitted to eternal bliss, found no followers. There was but one man of antique THE NEW MORAL IDEAL n times who was saved — the Emperor Trajan, who, so the legend tells, was freed from the fire of Hell not through his own merit, but by the prayer of Pope Gregory the Great.* In the times of enlightenment, in times of * Dante, therefore, finds him in the sixth heaven among the virtuous rulers, and the celestial Eagle explains this fact as follows : The first life and the fifth, that have their home Within my brow, amaze thee, in that they Adorn the regions where the angels roam ; Not as thou deemst they left their mortal clay, Heathens, but Christians, strong in faith to see, Or the pierc'd feet, or else the pierc'd feet's day p Beheld far off ; for one from Hell, where free Path to good- will is none, with flesh was clad, That so of lively hope reward might be ; Of lively hope, which put forth prayer that had Power to obtain that God his soul would raise, So that his will might turn to good from bad. The glorious soul of whom I tell the praise, Returning to his flesh for briefest hour, Believed in him who could direct his ways, And so believing, glowed with fiery power Of love so true, that when he died once more He was thought worthy of this blissful bower. Thomas Aquinas says : "As to the case of Trajan, one may accept the supposition that he was recalled to life by the prayers of St. Gre- gory and thus attained grace, through which he gained the remission of his sins and in consequence the freedom from punishment . . . yet others would rather say that the soul of Trajan was not simply absolved from the guilt which must be followed by eternal punishment, but that his punishment was only temporarily suspended, that is, until the Judgment Day." The other person of whom Dante speaks in those verses is the Trajan Rhipeus; but he was one of the " pre-Christians." Thomas Aquinas explains this as follows : " To many heathens a revelation of Christ was given, and if some were saved to whom the revelation had not been given, yet those were not saved without belief in the Divine Mediator, for if they had not an explicit belief they had an indefinite implicit 12 DANTE AND HIS TIME materialism, the civilising effects of Christendom have been as unjustly underrated. The same may be said of some enthusiastic admirers of the Ideals of the Renais- sance from Beccadelli to Friedrich Nietzsche. The expansion of Christendom continued from the first century of its existence throughout the whole Middle Ages. But, if we limit ourselves to the territory of antique Paganism, we may roughly assign a.d. 529 as the turning-point. In that year the last temple of Apollo in Italy was destroyed by St. Benedict, and the last seven masters of antique philosophy in Athens were expelled by the Emperor Justinian and fled to the Persian king Chosru. These two signal events may induce us to choose that year as the point at which the conquest of the ancient empire was completed and Paganism finally abolished. With the Christian religion new moral opinions began to prevail, which were wholly different from the ancient, as much from those of the civilised Greeks and Romans, as from those of the wild German and Celtic tribes, and which would alone have been sufficient to effect a thorough change in the state of European civilisation. Life and the world were considered in a new light. Life, for the confessors of the new creed, had a new purpose and a new meaning. Their morals, their virtues, their crimes, their duties, their relations to God and man, their ideals as well as their customs, were different. Now it is clear that men, who condemn deeds which are considered heroic and praiseworthy by others, who belief in Divine providence ; by believing that God was the Saviour of men, and would save them by ways which would best please Him, and according to what the Spirit had revealed to some who could see the truth." THE NEW MORAL IDEAL 13 sanction a conduct as heavenly which by others is con- sidered weak and abject, who hold things forbidden which by others are believed to be just and lawful, who follow aims which to others appear ridiculous, must needs lead essentially different lives. Nobody, therefore, exercises such powerful influence on men as he who is able to change their opinion as to their task and aim in life and the worth of their established institutions. The two social principles of Christendom, the doctrine" of love, of unconditional universal love, and the doctrine of equality, did more, perhaps, for the moral development of mankind, and produced more noble and gentle deeds, than any other element in human history. We generally forget the hard and frightful cruelty of the ancient races when we admire the splendour of their feats and accom- plishments. The Christian doctrine of equality was not based on political democratic reasons, but on the dogma that there exists an immortal soul in every man, be he nobleman or slave, and that this soul was to be saved, and could be well-pleasing to a Lord before whose eternal glory every earthly difference of rank and birth must vanish, before whose throne the slave could be welcomed and the Senator and Consul hurled into dark- ness. The soul made the Roman patrician equal to the negro slave, a notion which would have seemed absurd to a true Roman. While it must be conceded that these two doctrines may exist and prevail independently of Christian religion, it remains true, nevertheless, that Christianity did most to propagate them and give them the power which they obtained in modern democracy. It is true that these principles, that of love as well as that of equality, were continually disregarded and violated in the Middle Ages, and not the least by the Church i 4 DANTE AND HIS TIME herself ; but then the explanation of this lies in the fact that the wild and brutal men of those times were wholly incapable of fully understanding these doctrines, and much less of practising them in earnest. A second reason is obvious. As long as Christians were a little persecuted sect, only the purest and holiest belief could move men to accept baptism and to fulfil all the difficult duties, to run all the dangers, which they well knew to be the consequence. But when the doctrine of Christ became the accepted religion of the Empire and of the Court, when it no longer brought dangers but preferments and digni- ties, when it became the first s^ep the ambitious had to take, when the whole crowd of indifferent and low-minded people became Christians — how could the purity of the early times be preserved ? How could it be attained when the wild German warriors, in whose souls the ferocious warlike spirit of the race fought fiercely with the new doctrine, accepted it ? Their whole life became a continual convulsion, a constant wavering now to this side, now to the other, and of the same men the most frightful cruelties are reported, as well as moments of devoted ardour and meekest humility. There is no more expressive episode in mediaeval history, none that could be more characteristic of those wild Christian warriors than that, after the capture of Jerusalem, they killed every living person there, men, women, and children, and then, literally covered with blood, prostrated themselves at the Saviour's Tomb and kissed it with glowing religious ardour and devout humility ! But this savagery lay in the character of the race, not in their religion. As late as the sixteenth century it was the baptismal custom in Ireland to immerse new-born children entirely in water, leaving only the right arm out, THE NEW MORAL IDEAL 15 that it might remain pagan and able to deal blows un- fettered by Christianity. On the other hand, the most uncompromising of the Christians, Tertullian, the Montanists and other sects, carried their principles to the logical conclusion, and utterly condemned warfare and fighting, which was but consistent. And, finally, as the rich young man in the Gospel found the words of Christ too hard to follow, so men always found them : Church and State contented themselves, then as well as now, with the forms, which are so much easier to adopt and to shqw than the spirit. This was one side of the new religion. Another was the total change in moral ideals. The moral ideals of the ancients were : personal greatness, dignity, self-confidence, magnanimity, invincible firmness in every act. The Christians praised the very contrary : humility, obedience, self-sacrifice. Of course there were but few persons who really practised these virtues, distasteful as they were to the character of the race, but there were others who Exaggerated and distorted them to an unnatural degree. Antiquity saw everything in this present life, found all its ideals in beauty and sublimity on earth; it praised pleasure, as long as it was not immoderate, all its culture was joyful and sensual, therefore it was artistic in an eminent degree. I do not speak now of all the frightful degeneration. There can be no doubt about the corrup- tion of the latter times of antiquity and about the neces- sity of a moral reorganisation. Here I only speak of its performance and of its ideal. Ancient teachers praised a joyful and creative life — active life was their field — the shadowy life which was to come after it was an eternity of regret and sorrow. The new doctrine, on the contrary, : 16 DANTE AND HIS TIME saw in the life on earth only a short and passing state of preparation for the future life, which was to be the essential part of existence, and it exhorted all men to resign themselves and to turn from life. The world was a vale of tears, life a dreary waste of misery and heavy trials. The frightful state of the world did much to develop such views; the earth in those centuries was indeed a vale of tears, and as soon as the condition of men grew more pleasant, as soon as men could again begin to enjoy their existence, those ideas lost their power. Such views were corroborated by the doctrine of original sin. This gloomy conception of humanity, foreign to the European genius and bearing the mark of its riental birth, was developed chiefly by Augustine and weighed heavily on the souls of men. It caused men to regard nature and the human body as things unclean in themselves and sinful by their very existence ; it gave a new tendency to morals, new restraints to human life, and, exaggerated and distorted by fanatic monks, it pro- duced a series of strange moral phenomena, and led, particularly in the field of sexual life, to consequences which were hardly less pernicious and immoral than the licence of decaying antiquity. Men in those times led lives of trembling anxiety, now carried away by powerful passions into horrible crime, and again tortured by fearful pangs of remorse. Earthly life being so thoroughly sinful and the continual danger of losing the eternal so imminent, it necessarily seemed best to dedicate it wholly to penitence ; for even those who should attain the impossible and be perfectly virtuous, even they had gained but little, for they had enough to bear in their inheritance of original sin. This led to the THE NEW MORAL IDEAL , 7 institution of monasteries and of hermit life. ' Men broke and abjured all human ties, castigated themselves in the most unnatural way, now seeing in feverish dreams a wonderful paradise, now persecuted by horrible tempta- tions, the outbursts of a tortured fancy. We know of saints and hermits who forbade their parents to see them and remained deaf to all prayers, who caused their own children to be tortured before their very eyes in order to render themselves insensible to earthly sentiments, who neither washed nor combed themselves, nor changed their clothes, but remained motionless all their lives in a rapturous trance. Though not all the world participated in such madness, yet all the world recognised in it the ideal life. Procreation and the continuance of mankind, nay, its very existence, was in itself a sin. , To make life appear as odious as possible, the greatest stress was laid on the dark, the sordid, the painful and unclean sides of life. Innumerable works of the earliest and of the latest parts of the Middle Ages were conceived to enforce the miseries and impurities of human life ; the poor remnants of art were dedicated to the same object.* * A characteristic and much read work of the twelfth century was the treatise of Cardinal Lothar (afterwards Pope Innocent VII. of the family which later on was called de' Conti), De contemptu mundi sive de miseria humancB conditionis ("Of the Contempt of the World and the Miseries of the Human State "), which was soon translated into Italian by Bono Giamboni. It contains sentences like the following : " Man is composed of dirt and the most vulgar nutriments, while other things are made out of much nobler nutriments, for the Sage says that the stars and the planets are made of fire, spirits and winds of air, fishes nd birds of water. . . . The trees produce leaves, blossoms and fruits out of themselves, men vermin and lice ; the former produce wine and oil and balms, the latter excrements. The former produce sweetest odours, the latter abominable stench. ... If thou wilt well think on it, woman conceives her son in the heat of lust, gives him birth in pain and sorrow, nourishes him with fear and toil, and watches him with B 1 8 DANTE AND HIS TIME To make sin more horrible the fancy of men tormented itself with the invention and contemplation of ever more minute descriptions of Hell and Purgatory ; every second of man's life was of anxious importance, for the smallest sin, if it was not repented and remitted during this life, was sure to draw after it, at the very least, long pro- tracted pain in the life beyond ; and as in Egypt of old, human life became dark and joyless. And as often as Nature, like a dammed-up stream, rose and overflowed its limits, lust and passion became the more savage and furious. Another new and unhappy feature, which had been unknown in European history before the Middle Ages and I the expansion of Christendom, were the religious wars. Paganism was tolerant, every man was allowed to worship the gods he chose. The persecution of Christians in the Roman Empire was not founded on religious motives but on purely political reasons, Christians being thought a subversive sect and hostile to the State. Among the common people especially it was generally believed that in their secret religious assemblies the Christians killed little pagan children, a belief which seems to recur in every time and in every place, wherever strange and mysterious little sects live separated and yet intermixed with the people ; the same superstition is found to this day in China, where the people believe that the Christians kill Chinese children, their eyes being needed for some religious ceremony ; and in Europe, where Christians in their turn believe in similar horrors concerning Jewish rites. But, apart from political reasons, or when not care and anxiety, and all this is just from natural impulse. . . . The new-born boy says ' A,' the woman ' E,' which are both the sounds of woe and pain, as many as there are born of Eve's race." THE NEW MORAL IDEAL 19 stimulated by such odious and exciting rumours, all occidental religions were rather tolerant, while all religions of oriental origin, the Jewish, the Christian, the Moslem faith, are intolerant. Persecution, however, had not its origin in the spirit of Christianity, but in the fanatic zeal and orthodox rage of those who confessed it ; and mad quarrels about the most insignificant shades of dogmatic differences cost the lives of millions of men. This rage manifested itself from the very beginning. The Arians once killed 3000 Catholics in a riot in Con- stantinople ; one Arian bishop in Alexandria ordered all Catholics there to be scourged or roasted alive ; wherever the Catholics came into power they did the same with the Arians. By oppressed Christian sects the Vandals were called into Africa and the Mohammedans into Egypt. And this madness never ceased until recent times. In the sixteenth century more people were killed from religious motives in the Netherlands alone, and in the space of but twelve years — Christians by Christians — than in all the persecu- tions of Christians in the whole immense Roman Empire during four hundred years. The dissenter was a demon, doomed to Hell, an abomination to God ; and men blas- phemously fancied that their murderous cruelty was shared by God ! One of the most influential ecclesiastic authors, Peter Lombard, wrote the monstrous sentence that the joys of the blessed would be enhanced after the Judgment by the aspect of the damned in their pain. Thus the salvation of the soul, first by true faith, and secondly by pious deeds— both were soon separated in theory as well as in practice — became the first object and aim of every mediaeval man. Every believer— they formed the immense majority-— did in his own way what 20 DANTE AND HIS TIME he could. Some devoted their whole lives to contempla- tion and preparation for the life beyond ; those who did not go so far did their best by prayers and works of re- pentance. The penitent monk and penitent pilgrim were characteristic phenomena of the Middle Ages : they were to be seen wandering on all public roads, kneeling in every church, often dragging heavy chains or iron rings after them or wound around their bodies. Religious vows of all kind played an important part in every man's life. The prince promised a crusade for a victory over his enemies, the nobleman a chapel for a vengeance or for a recovery from illness, the serf a candle or a hundred prayers for finding a missing sheep, or for keeping his damaged plough serviceable until night. A vast number of persons, men as well as women, took the vows, sometimes near the end of their lives, sometimes on their very death-beds, so that they might die monks or nuns. This whole life, devoted on principle to supersensual things, was organised in the visible Church. A vast and powerful hierarchy controlled the community of believers. The Oriental Christian Church became organised accord- ing to the imperial system of the Romans ; and its organisation was so splendidly framed, spiritual and temporal links were so admirably interwoven in powerful chains, the whole system was founded on so cunning an application of all psychologic means, that it has survived every attack from without and all decay within, and has held its position, if not victoriously, yet unconquered, to the present day. Oriental ecstasy found, while keeping unimpaired its mystic symbols, a perfect expression in the beautiful Catholic ritual, always so impressive to the senses and 5 THE NEW MORAL IDEAL 21 minds of the people ; and as the oyster secretes its beau- tiful pearl and surrounds itself with the protective shells, so the whole religious movement surrounded itself with a very rational hierarchical system for the preservation and protection of faith as well as of the many material interests of the Church. The whole organisation found its central unity in the Vicar of Christ, the Bishop of Rome. This development and this concentration form a great and interesting phenomenon in history. It was made possible by a great number of co-operating causes, by the splendour of power which hovered over old Imperial Rome, to which long after its decay the sonorous verse bore witness : Roma caput mundi regit orbis frena rotundi ; then by the necessity of a uniform organisation for the double purpose of expanding the domain of belief and of retaining the newly converted, a necessity which was pro- vided for with subtlest intelligence, and last not least by the personal efforts of great Popes, by the deeds of those who were noble and great as well as by the energetic, clear and foreseeing policy of others. Thus the Catholic religion ruled Christian Europe from Rome as its centre. CHAPTER III THE POLITICAL IDEAL Thus a complete change in the social and political state in the ruling races, in religion, in morals, in culture, separates mediaeval men from those of antiquity. But however great the contrast may be in reality, reality itself is but one half of our life ; the other half consists in our conceptions. Our conceptions of reality, the more or less distorted reflections, which all events leave in men's brains, always influence the actions of men, and therewith the events themselves. What a man believes himself to be, even if perfectly false, has as much influence on his doings as what he is in fact, for his belief is but a part of himself, contradictory as it may appear. This is the reason why ideas, even the merest illusion, nay, unmiti- gated stupidity itself, are facts and powers in history. i The illusion of mediaeval men was, that they believed I themselves living in antiquity — that they had but a slight * idea of the gulf that yawned between them and the previous era, but believed their own times to be in every respect the continuation and even the perfection, the crowning fulfilment of antiquity. The crowning fulfilment — for had they not the true faith, which the old Greeks and Romans had never known ? The German tribes which destroyed the Roman Empire THE POLITICAL IDEAL 23 did this, as it were, unintentionally. They invaded it because they wanted to conquer territory, and desired booty, glory and power. But the empire itself, with its organisation, its vast extension, the dazzling splendour of its magnificent culture and its immense riches, was regarded by them with reverential awe, they wanted but to participate in it. The weakest emperors were sur- rounded by a halo of gold and purple, of pomp and power, and when the barbarians accepted Christianity, an impor- tant reason of this conversion was its being the emperor's religion. Even after the division of the empire, after the downfall of the Western throne when first the Goths and then the Lombards ruled in Italy, the new masters were regarded as usurpers, not only by the old Italian popula- tion, but the German princes themselves, who had con- quered and in fact governed Italy, were at heart of the same opinion. None of them dared to call himself Emperor, not even King of Italy — they styled themselves Kings of the Goths, Kings of the Lombards. A shadow of imperial sovereignty seemed to hover above their thrones. Parts of Italy, Ravenna, the so-called dukedom of Rome, and large territories in the south, were for a long time directly subject to the Greek emperor, and governed by him through the Exarch of Ravenna. Numerous traces of the Greek language may be found in modern Italian. As late as in the year 663, the Emperor Constans II. visited Rome on a survey of his empire ; he was the last Greek emperor who personally entered Rome, but for a long time the Popes continued to be confirmed by the Exarchs. In 772, a Bull of Hadrian I., he who called Charlemagne to Italy, begins with the words : Imperanie domino nostro, piissimo Augusto Constantino a Deo coronato magno imperatore . . . (" During the reign of our Sovereign, the most pious and 24 DANTE AND HIS TIME august Constantinus, our great Emperor, crowned by God . . ."). Had those emperors, their rightful sovereigns, the direct successors of the Roman Caesars, been able to assist them against the Lombards, the Popes would never have called the Franks into Italy. But Charlemagne had other views and intentions in coming to Italy than the former German kings. He put an end to the uncertain conditions on Italian ground, entirely disregarding the problematic claims of Eastern emperors on the Western throne. But when, in the year 800, he ordered Pope Leo to crown him as Roman emperor, even he was fully persuaded that he had but put an end to an interregnum, that he had seized the same crown which Romulus Augustulus in the year 475 had laid down at the feet of Odovakar. and that he there- with had become the direct successor of Caesar Qctavianus Augustus, the first of the emperors. This legitimistic dream existed 'throughout the Middle Ages and had incalculable consequences. It gave birth to the notion that the imperial dignity meant primarily the sovereignty ever the Roman people, and that only in Rome could it be bestowed and received. Rome, however, became more and more identified, especially in the eyes of foreigners, with the papal throne. Such a state of things had never been intended by Charle- magne. Devout as he was, he always considered himself as the Pope's and the Roman people's sovereign just as the Byzantine emperor before him; as all Christian emperors had been, who would have laughed at the idea of deriving their imperial power from the Pope. Charles had acted as judge in the Pope's cause, and received his expurgatory oath, even before the ceremony of coronation had been performed. THE POLITICAL IDEAL 25 He acknowledged his father Pipin's donations of certain territories and their revenues, but he never intended con- ceding the power of independent government to the Pope. He had allowed the Pope to crown him in order to add solemnity to the act ; but, in order to bar any prescriptive right, he would not permit his son and successor, Louis the Pious, to take the crown at Rome, nor from the Pope, but crowned him with his own hands in the year 8i_8, at the Diet of Aachen, as Emperor of the Romans. He, the emperor himself, nominated the emperor — a great and far-seeing man in whatever he undertook. Charlemagne's successors, however, were weaklings, while the Popes, especially Leo IV., the son of Radoald, and Nicholas I., the son of Theodore, were powerful personalities and bold politicians. They won precedence over the weak -and discordant Carolingian princes, the spiritual halo which surrounded their ever-growing power making victory easier for them. A The most important effect was, that the empire was named and thought to be that of the Romans, and not a new empire of Germans, as it was in reality. Words and traditions had a much greater power on mediaeval men than on us, and the word " empire " seemed intrinsically^ connected with Imperial Rome; hence it was universally' believed that the elected German king could not lawfully become emperor except in Rome, an illusion which cost \ the German people oceans of blood. A second and later consequence of this imagined con- tinuity was the acceptance of Roman law. In the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, when Roman law again began to be universally studied, and the emperors learned that it had been the law of the old empire, they naturally thought themselves bound to accept it as the law of their pre- ^ a> 26 DANTE AND HIS TIME decessors, fully persuaded as they were that their new empire was identical with the old. Nobody even thought of questioning whether it was suited to the new state of things. It was the law of an autocratic empire, while the new empire was a feudal state ; it had been made for a country with highly developed civilisation, industry, commerce and finance; ill suited for countries whose economy was founded on primitive agricultural institutions. Besides, it expressed the views and sentiments of a different race, its precepts were strange and incomprehensible to the people. But in the Middle Ages no one ever inquired into the nature of a thing ; words and forms alone were con- sidered, and always were decisive. A third consequence was that Latin became the official language of the empire, and thus gained that immense influence which it preserved throughout the whole period, and which makes itself felt even by us. Thus men received a language which was universal, and by means of which scholars and statesmen of all lands could communicate with each other ; the barbarians found a highly developed idiom capable of expressing thoughts, for which their mother-tongue was not mature. Moreover, they received the key to the treasures of ancient literature. On the other hand, the supremacy of the Latin speech consider- ably retarded the development of the national languages and of popular instruction, it widened the gulf between the cultured and the illiterate classes. Culture was confined to an unfamiliar medium ; the very language of civilisation and science, being other than that of daily life, estranged them from life and nature. Thus antiquity, or let us rather say what people knew of antiquity, or what they deemed it to be, became the THE POLITICAL IDEAL 27 universal basis on which they believed everything must needs be founded — the remnants of antique literature were clad with an authority which forbade doubt and criticism. The same authority made itself felt in many other fields, and even in the affairs of everyday life. It was from antiquity that men wanted to derive their descent and the rights they valued most There was no noble Italian family but traced its descent from some old Roman, no town which did not claim to have been founded by fugitive Trojans. This ambition was not confined to Italy. The monk Otfried, of Weissenburg, in his " Harmony of the Gospels," says that the Franks are descended from the Macedonians. The Roman nobles called themselves Consuls, and later on Senators or Proconsuls. In the same measure as knowledge increased and the movement which is now called the Renaissance advanced, the an- tique ideal grew stronger, until in Cola Rienzi, u the Last of the Tribunes," who summoned all princes and cities of the world to the tribunal of the sovereign Roman people, the political delusion reached its culmination and exploded like a bubble. The astonishment and the mockery of the summoned made the change manifest to all the world, and made men conscious of the real state of things, to which they had been blind for so many cen- turies. But not until true antiquity was again discovered and understood did men fully perceive how remote they already were from it. Mediaeval society thought that it was the unbroken con- tinuance of the antique. Historical knowledge being defi- cient, people fancied that the social state and civilisation of the ancients had been just the same state of feudalism and chivalry as their own was. In the numerous mediaeval n. 28 DANTE AND HIS TIME tales of Troy and of Alexander the Great we always find the same feudal surroundings and chivalrous manners and customs. Antiquity had been the preparation of the great Christian empire which was ruled by the Emperor and by the Pope, and there was no historical event in ancient times that was not regarded as a preparatory step of Divine providence for those institutions. In the second canto of the " Divine Comedy," Dante thinks himself unworthy of visiting the realms of the dead, which nobody had visited before him except St. Paul and iEneas, whose descent had been told by Virgil. That the Apostle, " the vessel of election," was worthy of such a vision is obvious, that iEneas could be admitted is ex- plained by Dante in his mission : For he of our dear Rome and its great might Was chosen sire in heaven empyreal, But this and that, to speak truth definite, Were fixed and 'stablished for the Holy See Where the great Peter's Vicar sits of right ; He, in that journey, where he won from thee His glory, heard of things from whence did flow The Papal mantle and his victory. (Plumptre.) In the same way, Dante, in his political treatise " On Monarchy," derives the imperial power from the Romans, who in their turn had been predestined and empowered by Divine providence to conquer and rule the world. Hence it follows — such is Dante's argument in this Ghibelline pamphlet — that the emperor's rights are derived directly from God and not from the Pope. It was the highest political ideal of the Middle Ages that Pope and Emperor — the two swords, or the two lights of the world, as they were called — should govern it THE POLITICAL IDEAL 29 in peace with each other, one caring for its spiritual the other for its temporal welfare. Absolute theocracy in all spiritual, absolute monarchy in all temporal questions j this was the political ideal, especially that of Dante. The real state of things and their development of course never corresponded to this ideal. Essays were made towards its realisation by a few powerful persons, both from the papal and from the imperial throne. But the very insti- tutions of feudalism, the troubled state of the empire, the division of the land into innumerable greater or smaller estates, rendered the absolute power of the Emperor inef- • fective. Then the bearers of the two supreme powers .. were but men, exposed to human weakness and blinded ■ ■ by ambition ; they quarrelled, and instead of being allies, , ' became rivals. The impossibility of delineating a sure limit between. their mutual competences, the undying question as to'^ what belonged to the purely spiritual sphere and what. ' was purely temporal, the necessary mingling of both in real life, the innumerable conflicts of interest, occasioned " unceasing complaints of both parties against encroach- .' ments from the other side, and originated that great strife -, between the two powers which, drawing almost every question of political and intellectual life into its vortex, went on for centuries and has not quite subsided in our days. We should be thankful for it. Had it been pos- sible for the two pov/ers to unite, or had one succeeded in making the other completely subservient to its aims, the consequence would certainly not have been the realisation of Dante's ideal— an empire flourishing in eternal peace— but a uniform Chinese despotism, by which all freedom and all development had been made impossible. CHAPTER IV THE COMBAT BETWEEN CHURCH AND STATE The ambition of the spiritual lords, who desired to extend their control over temporal matters also, pretend- ing that their power as the spiritual was the higher, gave the first impulse to discord. As was said above, during the reign of the last Carolingian princes, the rights of the Emperor diminished while the authority of the Pope increased. By the ninth century the papal throne had become a ruling power in Europe, and has remained so ever since, at least in principle, even during the period of its deepest decay in the tenth century; for as soon as the state of the Church was bettered and purified through the great reforming movement, the Popes instantly re- newed their former claims, and as the nations grew more and more religious, succeeded in enforcing them. In the eighth and ninth centuries the great forgeries of the so-called Donation of Constantine (a pure invention and a falsification throughout), on which the temporal dominion of the Popes is essentially based, were first perpetrated. L In the ninth the Donations of the Kings Pipin and Lewis 1 were forged. Although founded on fact, they were com- pletely false so far as the pretended documents showed larger territories and far more comprehensive rights than had ever been conferred by the originals. But still more THE CHURCH AND STATE COMBAT 31 important were the false decretals of the so-called pseudo- 1 Isidorus. In the place of the collection of genuine) decretals — that is, papal decrees — which had been made by Bishop Isidorus of Seville, Churchmen began, in the latter half of the ninth century, to use a forged collection ascribed to the same Isidorus, but which probably origin- ated in the north-east of France. It contained a large,, number of letters of former Popes, almost all forgeries, inj which the supremacy of the Bishop of Rome over all! bishops and archbishops of the world, and his spiritual 1 control of all laymen, was asserted in much stronger terms than hitherto. At the same time, all clergymen were rendered almost totally exempt from civil justice and the authority of civil magistrates. The tendency of the falsi- fication was to elevate and to centralise the power of the Church and to transform it into a monarchic institution. Parchments and writs had a far higher authority in those times than they have now ; critic^l^ijnquiry being un- known — for, indeed, hardly any one except the clergy*had learning enough to read these documents — the possibility of falsification never was so much as suspected, and those decretals soon became established law. If, however, we look at the whole transaction from a purely historical, and not from a moral point of view, we^ may say that those letters, though forged and attributed • to Popes, who could never have thought of such a power being given to them, were nevertheless the adequate expression of public opinion, and of the claims of the Roman Church, as justified by the spirit of the times. In those letters the Church gave itself a legal basis on which it could found its dominion. It does not seem to make a great difference whether they were " decreed " in Rome or forged in Rheims, because the fact remains that in 32 DANTE AND HIS TIME them the real state of Church power found a c#difica» tion. The mutual position of the Pope and Emperor under- went a complete change. In the year *]JJ the Romans had sworn the oath of fealty to Charlemagne and the Pope had acknowledged him as his sovereign. Less than a century later Pope Nicolas I. was Sovereign Lord of Rome and the Emperor Lewis II. led his horse on foot„ Another change followed, by which the Emperors re- covered their original power of enthroning and deposing the Popes, but after many uncertainties and continual shifting of power now to this side and now to the other, the Popes, assisted by the ever-increasing religious move- ment among the peoples, were decidedly victorious ; Gregory VII. was in a position to claim the papal dominion over the world. In the tenth century the Emperors had nominated the Popes ; in the course of the next the Emperor's crown, though always due to the German king, became a gift of the Pope, until Emperor Lothar seemed to settle the strife by acknowledging in a written document that he owed his imperial power to the Pope, from whom he had received it. With the rise of the Hohenstaufens the combat began anew, and lasted until both powers — that of the Pope as well as that of the empire — had bled themselves to death. Even before the Carolingian house had become extinct jthey had lost their power in Italy, which fell into an ^anarchic state. After the deposition of Charles the Bald, princes of Lombard, Frank and Burgundian *ri$in suc- cessively became kings of Italy, but none %{ them obtained a real and lasting power* In R#me there w*s an open and constant opposition on the part of the THE CHURCH AND STATE COMBAT 33 Roman people to the Popes; the fierce Roman aris- tocracy dominated the papal see. In the course of thirty years, five out of eight Popes died violent deaths, either strangled in prison or killed by rebellious nobles ; two renounced their dignities, and only one of them died a natural death. This was the time of most profound J decay in the Roman Churchy In the year 1046 three* Popes fought for the Tiara, until Emperor Henry III. put* an end to this state in the Synod of Sutciby deposing all three and enthroning a German bishopr Five German Popes now succeeded one another, all strong men and favouring reform. In the tenth century the barbarism of the people and the worldliness of the clergy had reached its height. Then began a religious reaction, originating in the monastic orders, and particularly in French cloisters, the centre of which was the newly founded monastery of| Cluny. The original tendency of this movement was ascetic ; an agitation against the life of worldly pleasure and fighting which most priests led, and particularly against the marriages of priests, which had become general ; at the same time they enforced Church govern- ment by carrying into the hierarchy the same severe and centralistic spirit in which their convents were organised. It was not only victorious within the Church itself, but propagated by the agitation of monks and hermits; it conquered the minds of men, everywhere deepening the religious spirit and reinforcing the ideals of the Church. It led to that mysticism which played so important a part in the intellectual life of the later centuries of the Middle Ages, it decided the great combat between the Emperor and the Pope, and it had a decisive influence on the development of the Catholic Church. From France it spread over Germany and Italy, where it found a new 3+ DANTE AND HIS TIME centre in Florence in the monastery of Vallombrosa. Monks from Cluny and their partisans soon attained the first places at the Papal Court. The earnest and erudite Germans, who, following on the dissolute Romans, now occupied the papal seat, called to their council pure and austere men whose spirit was kindred to their own. An interesting fact may be observed in the final result : the German emperors, wishing to purify the sullied Church, had nominated German Popes ; these, led by the same tendency of purification and reform, selected men who L soon turned the policy of the Church against the German 1 emperors. The Popes, who had been delivered by the Emperor from the tyranny of the Roman nobles, now reclaimed their independence from the Emperor himself. Nicolas II., formerly Bishop Gerard of Florence, a Bur- gundian, confined the right of electing the Pope to the Cardinals alone. His second successor was Hildebrand, the son of Bonizo, a Tuscan carjtenter^ Bonizo and Hildebrand being both frequent Longobard names, we may assume that he, too, was of Longobard origin. He was small, of poor figure, but one of the most remarkable and strong-willed men who ever lived, not vehement, not irascible, but quiet, gentle, and of an iron firmness of purpose ; " blandus ille tyrannus," " the gentle tyrant," or " the holy Satan " as he is called in the letters of his friend Pier Damiani, who often felt the irresistible power of Gregory's personality. He was not satisfied with freedom of election, but i claimed supremacy over the Emperor and the temporal sovereignty of the Church over Hungary, Bohemia, Russia, Spain, Dalmatia, Croatia, Poland, England, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and the newly founded Nor- man state in the South of Italy — the latter being the only THE CHURCH AN* STATE C#M*AT 35 •ne which the PWjies afterwards succeeded in making really a fief of the Church. He proclaimed the programme of the universal dominion of the Roman Church. In his reign the so-called War of Investitures com- menced. The Pope demanded that the prelates should henceforth be elected by the clergy of their diocese alone, and confirmed by the Pope. Just as this demand seemed, and though good reasons could be alleged for it, civil authority had no choice but to oppose it. It had been the policy of the Emperor Henry III. to employ the episcopal power against the unruly feudal princes of the empire. Bishops were selected for his counsellors and ministers, even for his generals ; the bishops of the empire were given large feudal dominions; the men who were nominated to bishoprics were able politicians or staunch warriors of undoubted loyalty to the Emperor ; and when the Emperor's treasury was empty, those were appointed who could pay for their offices. Such a system could not be approved by a Pope who, while he earnestly tried to raise the ecclesiastical spirit, wanted the bishops to be his political instruments against the Emperor. He demanded that only true clergymen elected by clergymen should be called to clerical offices. The Emperor alleged that he could not submit to a system by which the third part or more of the feudal estates of the empire would be bestowed and occupied by a power which was riot his. He was willing to grant the freedom of election, but on the one condition that the fiefs should be returned to the empire. The bishops would not hear of this. Both parties insisting on their demands, a war of fifty years duration ensued, which caused great ruin both in Italy and in Germany, and embittered the reign of two Emperors and of six 36 DANTE AND HIS TIME Popes. The last but one of the Popes, Paschal II., a mild-tempered old man, thought it but just for the clergy, resolved as they were to be merely clerical henceforth, to give up the estates ; but the whole clergy immediately rose against him in uproar, and a General Council refused to ratify the treatise. The strife was an unequal one, and its conduct was terrible and confusing to the minds of men. The Pope released laymen from their duty of obedience to simoniacal bishops and vassals from allegiance to their lords. All human relations between men and all moral sentiments were thus confused and disturbed. The son rose against his father, the Church became divided within itself, for in Germany and in Lombardy the bishops of the old school fought on the Emperor's side. But the final victory of the Church could not be doubted. " The re- sources of the German monarch," says Lamprecht, " were of an external and merely political nature, unable to cope with the power which the ideas of reform had over the souls of men." The persons who played prominent parts in this strife are well known. The dissolute and unhappy old Emperor Henry IV., the hero of a hundred battles, who for three days stood a penitent in the snow before the castle of Canossa — he, too, was a man of high gifts and stubborn force, but dissipated and unsteady, no match for a man like Pope Gregory VII. At Canossa the Pope took -the Host with the imprecation that, if he was conscious of the slightest guilt on his part, God might strike him dead ; he then offered the other half to the Emperor that he might do the same, but the Emperor did not dare. This event is highly characteristic of both adversaries and of their unequal personal force. THE CHURCH AND STATE COMBAT 37 Another striking person was the Marchioness Matilda of Tuscany, the new Deborah, as she was called by her admirers, a proud fanatically pious woman, always ready to fight for the Church. Disappointed and unhappy in her marriage with the hunchbacked Duke Godfrey of Upper Lorraine, she devoted all the energy of her high- strung nature to the Church, and, in spite of her pride, suffered herself to be overruled by two masterful priests, Bishop Anselm of Lucca, her particular friend and spiritual director^and Gregory himself, who cleverly contrived to direct and control her, through the bishop's influence. She lived in constant emotional dependence on theSe two men, who exercised an almost hypnotic power over her. When suffering from illness she was cured by the bishop laying his hands on her forehead, and even after his death she would lean her head on the wooden board on which his corpse had lain, to recover from indisposition ; when her eyes became inflamed, she put a ring on them which the bishop once had worn, or a piece of paper on which he had written prayers. Her case is typical, and instances of the like may be found a]so in modern times.* There is a reverse side to the victory of the Pope. It was in the year 1075 that a Pope dared for the first time to command the Roman Emperor to obey him and dismiss his counsellors under penalty of excommunication ; two years later the Emperor stood a penitent before the walls of Canossa. In that same year, about Christmas, the * Some historians, hostile to the Church, have put a gross interpre- tation upon her relations to the bishop as well as to the Pope ; see, in refutation of these, the excellent statement in Davidsohn's " Geschichte von Florenz," p. 253. The stern, warlike marchioness has been trans- formed by Dante into the graceful Matilda, whom he sees singjng and gathering flowers in the terrestrial Paradise, preceding the procession of the triumphant Church. 38 DANTE AND HIS TIME same Pope Gregory VII. was attacked and beaten in the Church of St. Peter by a Roman nobleman called Cencio, and finally imprisoned in the assailant's palace. These are genuine scenes of the Middle Ages. The domestic strife between the Popes and the city of Rome runs like a caricature parallel to the world — upheaving combat between the Popes and the Emperors. While Frederic Barbarossa humbled himself before Alexander III., and King Henry II. of England suffered the Pope to inflict penalties on him " such as to-day n (I quote from Machiavelli, and " to-day" means 1520), ll a private person would be ashamed to submit to," that same Pope, " who wielded such an authority over distant princes," in spite of the humblest prayers, was unable to move the Romans to permit him to enter his town and his church. Gregory IX., the great enemy of Frederic II., was five times forced to fly from Rome, and returned thither five times, yielding to the> trrgent prayers of the Roman people. " But as soon as one demon was expelled from that people, seven devils possessed it again," says a biographer of this Pope. Their continual requests were money-gifts, and no Pope was able to satisfy their thirst for gold. Hardly any Pope during the whole Middle Ages could reside undisturbed in the city of Rome. One must strive to realise mediaeval Rome with its nine hundred towers, the gloomy palaces of the noblemen, the most important of which were constructed in the remnants of the mighty edifice of the past, the Colosseum, the Arches of Triumph, the castle of St. Angelo, then the narrow streets, and the narrowed but furious life which raged in them. The reader must picture to himself the unceasing family feuds between the Conti, the Frangipani, and the many other noble houses of Rome.* Every THE CHURCH AND STATE COMBAT 39 moment the feud is revived by some act of vengeance, some contested election, some piece of mockery ; the streets are instantly barred by chains drawn across them, towers are constructed rapidly everywhere, in every street from all the windows and roofs the vassals shoot, the houses of the hostile family are besieged, set on fire or torn down ; and constantly some quarter of the city or all its quarters are changed into the fortified camps of parties at war with one another. And as in Rome, so it was in many other towns of Italy. Another striking feature of the times is furnished by the election of antipopes. Few Popes, indeed, in the Middle Ages had their elections left uncontested. Passionate and unruly men did not content themselves with platonic opposition, their candidate was crowned notwithstanding the majority being against him, and pope and antipope ex- communicated each other and made armed war against each other, thereby perplexing still more the souls of believers. Fulcher of Chartres, who, while taking part in the first crusade, marched through Rome with a party of the pilgrims, gives the following account in the second chapter of the first book of his history of the Kingdom of Jeru- salem : "-Entering the Basilica of St. Peter we found men of the foolish Pope Wibert before the altar, who, sword in hand, unlawfully possessed themselves of the pious gifts which lay on the altar. Others were seen running on the beams of the ceiling, who threw stones down upon us, while we lay prostrate praying on the floor. One tower, however, was kept by the men of Pope Urban, who loyally held it for Urban, and resisted his enemies as well as they could. Much pain did we feel, seeing such outrage, but we could do nothing except implore God to avenge it." 40 DANTE AND HIS TIME The War of the Investitures was ended in the year 1 122 by the Concordat of Worms. It was ordained that, while the election should pertain to the clergy alone, the bestow- ing of fiefs should be reserved to the civil authorities ; so both had to unite in advance on the candidate for every election. Though this result was most natural and simple, it would not have been possible at any earlier time, before both parties were tired of the fifty years of struggle and the interest of men in the whole question had faded. But the combat beiween the Emperors and the Popes, between Church and State, continued never- theless, and raged with unbroken vehemence under the Emperors of the House of Swabia. Nor could it be otherwise. The Church claimed the temporal dominion over at least large parts of Italy, while the Emperors defended the rights of the empire. The Church fighting with spiritual weapons in the very souls of her anta- gonists had a double advantage, because, when victorious, her victory was certainly real ; when defeated, she became a martyr in men's eyes and instantly found new enthu- siastic champions. She repeatedly had her friends elected emperors, as, for example, the Guelf, Otto IV., against whom she in turn sent out Frederic II. But as soon as they had become emperors their most essential interests constrained them to oppose the Church. And the same was the case on the other side. When the Cardinal Count Sinibald Fiesco, who had always been a staunch partisan of the Emperor, was elected Pope as Innocent IV., Frederic II. said, " Now I have lost a true friend among the cardinals ; no Pope can be a Ghibelljne." CHAPTER V THE HOHENSTAUFEN During the reign of the Swabian princes, the war which divided the world and brought interminable civil discord and ruin to Italy becomes attractive with a new and heightened interest, for the men who now begin to play prominent parts in it seem more akin to us in culture and versatility of mind, their portraits have more life and colour, they are not mere shadows and enigmas to us, as are the dim and stiff figures of former generations. In the foreground of that historic scene the struggle and the fall of the House o f Hohens taufen appears like a grand and tremendous tragedy. The Hohenstaufens may be considered a human phenomenon. Another reigning family showing such an uninterrupted line of brilliant and gifted personalities will not easily be found in history. They did not exactly possess political talents, but they were all handsome, chivalrous, and broad-minded, possessing all the culture and freedom of thought of the period. A resplendent light of art and beauty is shed around them, almost every one 6f them was a renowned warrior and a minstrel too, and their glory was heightened by the tragic fate that fell to the lot of each. They were mediaeval l^iighthood and monarchism personified. For them fought the Spirit of Chivalry and Minstrelsy, of r 42 DANTE AND HIS TIME new-born Joy and Art, against the ascetic clerical power, and with them it was defeated. Theirs was the spirit of reawakening terrestrial life and culture. But in the same race was embodied for the last time the ideal of the old empire; the visionof the "Roman Empjre-of - the -German Nation," as its official title was, the creation of Charlemagne ; in them it strove for the last time to realise itself in all its fancied and traditionary power. Thus they became at the same time the repre- sentatives of a dying and of an arising period, uniting the aspirations of both. The empire had been founded (renewed, as people fancied) in the year 800, and after 1250 it fell. After the interregnum it was but a shadow, though it existed until 1806. • The new Dynasty of Habsburg inaugurates a new era, a new policy begins to prevail, the dawn of modern Europe seems to appear in a distance — the Middle Ages, the times of Chivalry and Romance, begin to decline. Dante, who in sorrowful verses, which form one of the most famous episodes of the " Divine Comedy " reproaches the Habsburg Emperor Albrecht that he never went to Rome, struck the keynote ; though later on some of the emperors again returned to it, the march to Rome, the central and crowning enterprise of the earlier emperors, the romantic symbol of a romantic imperialism, for which the Hohenstaufens had arrayed and exhausted all the might and splendour of their knightly hosts, had lost all its importance with them. Romantic symbols began to lose their power over the fancy of men, the princes ceased to care so much for the mere form of coronation, but turned their attention to more real power. This strong adherence to a dying institution was the ruin of the Hohenstaufens. In all intellectual matters THE HOHENSTAUFEN 43 they were abreast of their time, nevertheless they were unable to comprehend the current of its political and social movements. They failed to see that the day of the' cities and citizens was dawning and that feudalism was beginning to decline. Nowhere was this great change farther advanced than in Italy, the country which was at that time foremost in European civilisation ; and it was in combating the resistance of the Italian cities that the Hohenstaufens exhausted their power. Vain were all their victories, vain the re-erection of German feudal administration, in vain Barbarossa raised the Tuscan counts to the dignity of Princes of the Empire ; the towns were the stronger, for theirs was the higher civilisation, theirs the greater economical might, and the greater concentration of money as well as of military force. The Church, though in reality far from approving these movements, made good use of them. In all other lands} _ the Papacy remained hostile to all democratic changes, i England was laid under interdict by the Pope as soon as Magna Charta was won ; but in Italy the Church wisely took the part of the cities, and with their help vanquished the Emperor. Yet it was but a losing victory ; the Church had scarcely time to exult, so quickly did its fall follow upon that of its great opponents. It is not my object to relate here the history of this struggle ; I shall but try to throw, as it were, flying lights on it, and, as much as possible, I shall make the people who then lived and were made to feel its consequences speak for themselves. Like all the great conflicts of history, this, too, though founded on the deep antagonism of irreconcilable prin- ciples, was constantly called forth and renewed by num- berless greater or smaller causes of discord. Frederic 44 DANTE AND HIS TIME Barbarossa created a new one by marrying his son Henry to Constance, the heiress of Sicily. Sicily was considered s to be a fief of the Papal throne. It was not so by any lawful right ; but a hundred and fifty years before Norman counts, having won the isle by conquest, requested the Pope to bestow it upon them as feudatories of the Church, and the Pope had willingly complied to their wish, one usurper thus guaranteeing another's right. The Nor- mans said, " The kingdom is ours, for the Pope bestowed it upon us " ; the Popes said, " It must needs be our fief, for how could the Normans ask it from us had it beep otherwise ! " Nobody being at hand to object, this became the established state of things. Thus, by Henry's mar- riage, the German king and Roman emperor would have become the Pope's vassal as king of Sicily. To the many already existing difficulties and entanglements in the rela- tions of the two powers was thus added a quite impossible complication, which led on to the final catastrophe. The danger of the situation was not instantly felt ; • under the gloomy and terrible Henry VI. the House of the Hohenstaufen had reached the summit of its success. He ruled from the North Sea to the southern end of Italy, and, had his power been lasting, that of the Papacy would have been stifled by it. The Popes would have been as entirely dependent on the German emperors in Rome as later they were subject at Avignon to the will of the king of France. The history of those times looks very different accord- ing as it is regarded from an Italian point of view, or, as . is more usual, from that of a German partisan. Henry VI. was cruel and false to a degree unheard of even in a mediaeval monarch. Rebellious Sicilian barons he ordered to be blinded, to be tarred and burned ; others were buried alive ; one had a red-hot crown nailed to his head. Henry THE HOHENSTAUFEN 45 forced his own wife, the empress, to witness this spectacle, to punish her for sympathising with her countrymen. His early death, a most unexpected chance for the Church, was a relief to Italy. People dared to breathe again. His widow found herself so helpless that she had no other resource than to put her son Frederick, who at the time of his father's death was a child of two years, under the wardship of the Pope. In this way she hoped she would at least save for him the throne of Sicily. In Germany Otto IV. became king and emperor. Pope Innocent IV. saw all the power in his hands which Gregory VII. had claimed. The empire and Italy, France, England, Norway, Aragon, Leon, Hungary, and Armenia, yielded to his orders. He uttered the proud words, "As in the Lord's Ark of the Covenant the rod lay beside the manna of His grace, thus in the Pope's breast, with the science of the Divine law, lies the severity that destroys as well as the mildness that grants mercy." Fifteen hun- dred archbishops, bishops, and prelates attended the council which assembled in the Lateran in the year 121 5, and which was meant as a demonstration of the power of the Church. The unavoidable conflict between Pope and Emperor broke out again, the election of a Guelf and a partisan of the Church proving of no avail. The quarrel was about the imperial dominions in Central Italy, especially about the estates which belonged to the so-called Matildan Inheritance. The great countess had bequeathed imperial soil to the Church, and thus created another source of endless trouble, both powers claiming the estates as their own. The Hohenstaufen prince now appeared on the scene, as the instrument of the Pope, who sent his ward against the Guelf emperor. But first, in the year 1220, 46 DANTE AND HIS TIME Frederic II. was forced to swear an oath to Honorius III., by which he pledged himself never to unite Sicily with Germany, and to respect the rights of the Pope in Italy, an oath he could not keep without breaking that which he swore as Emperor to protect, and to augment the rights of the empire. A doubtful peace was maintained during the reign of the gentle old Pope Honorius. After his death, Ugolino de' Conti was elected Pope as Gregory IX. He appeared like a " thunderbolt from the south," as his biographer puts it. He was an old man when he was elected, and he held the see fourteen years, yet he made war on the Emperor with burning rage and inexorable will. The Emperor had vowed to go on a crusade, but could not undertake it, owing to a pestilence which broke out in his army. The Pope excommunicated him ; a great assembly of clergy filled the church of St. Peter, each holding a lighted candle in his hand. The Pope enume- rated all the transgressions of the Emperor, then he pro- nounced the sentence of the curse, all the priests repeated it and hurled their candles to the ground. Circular letters were sent by both parties to all the princes of the Chris- tian world. " Tua res agitur," Frederic cried to all the kings ; " There is no one among you whose power would not be menaced by the ambition of the Church." The Emperor went on the crusade, notwithstanding the Pope's interdict ; he recovered Jerusalem by a treaty, and when the Patriarch refused to crown an excommunicated monarch, he put the crown upon his head with his own hands. From Arab chroniclers we are able to gather most valuable information about this remarkable man. Out of courtesy to the Christian emperor, the kadi of Jerusalem had forbidden the muezzins to call the hours of prayer for THE HOHENSTAUFEN 47 believers from the minarets ; but Frederic summoned him to an audience, and forbade him to interrupt the customary rites for his sake, and is said to have added : " You Mus- sulmans are happy, not being continually bothered and hindered by the ambition of a priest like him of Rome." The Arab writer who saw him describes him as bald and shortsighted, and says that as a slave he would not have been of much value ; then he adds : " The Emperor was a worshipper of nature, who made light of the Catholic creed, which was but a show and a plaything for him." Meanwhile, the Pope had preached a crusade against him, and on his return Christians were thrown into con- ' sternation by seeing two armies of the Cross fighting against each other, one for the Pope, under the banner of St. Peter's Keys, the other imperial, under the sign of the Holy Cross. The Emperor's army was victorious, the Pope gave in, and once more they made peace, and in 1230 dined in Anagni at the same table. But, as the Florentine chronicler, Villani, says, " with all those trea- ties of peace there remained an evil disposition in the hearts of both," and as a Guelf he adds, " especially on the Emperor's side there was too much pride." The peace lasted two years, until a new discord arose between the Emperor and the Italian towns. Mantua closed its gates to him. "What," the Emperor cried, " pilgrims may walk freely around the earth, and I am to be unable to move within the borders of my empire ! " The towns implored the protection of the Pope, and in 1236 Gregory wrote the following letter : u The necks of kings and princes are bowed at the feet of priests, and the Christian emperors are bound to submit their actions not only to the Roman Pope but to all the clergy. The Lord, in subjecting the whole earth and all things visible and 48 DANTE AND HIS TIME invisible to the tribunal of the Holy See, has reserved the latter to His own judgment alone. It is known to all the world that the world's monarch, Constantine, with the approbation of the Senate and the people of the city and of the whole Roman Empire, decreed it to be right that the Vicar of the Prince of the Apostles, being the ruler of the priesthood and of all the souls in the empire, should wield the majesty over all terrestrial things and the bodies of men also. Thus thinking, that he, unto whom God has conferred celestial power on earth, must needs be Lord and Judge in all temporal matters too, Constantine bestowed on the Roman Pope the insignia, and the sceptre of the empire, the city with its dukedom — which thou art trying to seduce with thy gold — and the empire itself to eternity. Believing it to be impious that the Emperor of the Earth should wield any power in the place where the Head of the whole Christian religion is enthroned by the Emperor of Heaven, he left Italy to the government of the Pope, and for himself he chose an abode in Greece. From thence the Holy See transferred the empire to the Germans in the person of Charles, who humbly took upon himself a burden too heavy for the Roman Church : but by conceding to thy predecessors the Tribunal of the Empire and the Power of the Sword by coronation and unction, the Pope withal never renounced anything of his sovereign rights ; but thou wrongest those rights of the Popes and thine own honour and fealty no less if thou dost not acknowledge him, who is the owner and creator of thy power." It is obvious how the true relation between Pope and Emperor had been exactly reversed in the imagination of an age which had but a very dim notion of the real history of the past. THE HOHENSTAUFEN 49 Constantine had never regarded the Bishop of Rome but as an insignificant priest, and such pretensions would have seemed to him, and even to Charles sheer madness. As late as the tenth century the Emperor Otto III. had smiled when 1 he heard of the fable of Constantine and his forged Donation. In the thirteenth there was no man to doubt it ; even the most earnest Ghibellines only regretted that things were so, and not otherwise. Dante wrote : Ah ! Constantine, what evil came as child Not of thy change of creed, but of the dower Of which the first rich Father thee beguiled. and Walther von der Vogelweide, the German minstrel, sang : King Constantine, he gave so much, As unto you I will make known, For to the See of Rome he gave The Spear, the Cross, the Crown. That hour an angel cried in pain : " O woe ! O triple woe is me ! " Once Christendom did well behave, But then upon its field did fall A golden poison's rain ; Its honey now is changed to gall, To Thee, sweet Lord, I will complain : The priests will wrong the laymen's right, Too true has been the angel's sight. Again the war broke out, and again the Emperor was victorious. " Lift up your eyes round about and see . . ." so he wrote to the princes. And the Pope answered in the same style : " From the sea is arisen a beast full of names of blasphemy, that rages with the paws of a bear and with the mouth of a lion, and whose body is shaped like that of a pard. It opens its mouth to hurl blasphemies at the name of God, and rests not but will throw similar 50 DANTE AND HIS TIME darts against His Holy of Holies and the Saints of Heaven." This Encyclical — so an English chronicler writes — would have aroused all the world against the Emperor but that the Romish Court exacted so much money from all parts of the world. Five times as many taxes were paid from England to the Pope as to the English king himself. The nobility of France assembled in a Diet of Nobles to consult on measures to be taken against the unbearable financial claims of the clergy ; a great many pamphlets of the time breathe a fanatic hatred against them. Dante, passing through the fourth circle of Hell, where covetousness and avarice are punished, notices that the heads of many of the sinners are shaven. On the death of Gregory IX., Innocent IV. succeeded to the papal throne ; the lion was followed by a fox, who was still more dangerous as an antagonist. He induced the Emperor's son to rebel against his father ; murderers who conspired against Frederic's life received the Pope's blessing. In a rescript which is still extant they are called "the brilliant sons of the Church, on whom God has shed the light of His countenance." Still the Emperor was victorious. His generals, Ezzelino Romano, the Lord of Padua, the Marquises of Lancia and Pallavicini, his natural sons, Frederic of Antioch, Enzio of Sardinia, and Manfred Lancia, were everywhere triumphant. The Pope fled to France, but all the princes refused to receive him in their territories. He then summoned a council at Lyons, which at that time belonged to the empire, and there pronounced the deposi- tion of the Emperor. This was in the year 1245. "No peace with the viper's brood ! " was the Pope's answer to those who wanted to persuade him to a milder course. s THE HOHENSTAUFEN 51 It is interesting to read what the chroniclers relate of the consequences of the struggle. " My soul is filled with horror," writes the so-called monk of Padua, u in relating the sufferings of my time and the destruction, for it is now full twenty years that for the sake of the Apostolic See and the imperial throne the blood of Italy has been shed like water." Fra Salimbene of Parma writes : " In the days of Emperor Frederic, particularly after he was deposed from the empire, there were cruel wars, and the people could neither till their fields nor sow, nor reap, nor plant vine- yards, nor gather the grapes, nor dwell in villages ; men were unable to work except quite near the towns, where they were protected by the knights who dwelt in them ; armed warriors guarded the workmen the whole day long, and the peasant cultivated the fields meanwhile. And this was necessary because of the robbers, marauders and vagabonds, whose number had increased beyond all measure. And they captured men and threw them into dungeons, that they should ransom themselves with money. And they drove the cattle away and ate them or sold them. And if they failed to ransom themselves " [Brother Salimbene always writes in great haste and excitement] "they hung them up by their feet or by their hands, or drew their teeth, or put thorns and gags into their mouths, that they should ransom themselves the faster, and that was more horrible to them than death. And they were more cruel than demons are, and a man in these times liked as well to see a man coming along his path as he would the Devil. And the country fell to waste and was deserted, because there were no peasants in the fields and nobody walked on the country roads. And the birds and the beasts of the forests multiplied beyond all 52 DANTE AND HIS TIME bounds, pheasants and partridges and quails, hares and roes, stags, buffaloes, boars and rapacious wolves. For they no longer found food near the villages, lambs and sheep as before, because the villages were all burnt, and therefore the wolves gathered in great packs around the ditches of the towns, and howled unceasingly because their hunger was too great. And by night they entered the towns and devoured men, who slept in the colonnades or on carriages, and the women and little children too. Sometimes they even dug through the walls of the houses and they tore the little children to pieces in the cradles. " Nobody would believe it who did not see it with his own eyes, all the horrors which I saw perpetrated in those times by men as well as by beasts of all kinds. Yes, I have seen with my own eyes two foxes climbing the roof of the convent of St. Francis, near Faenza, to catch two fowls sitting on the cornice. And one of them we caught, and I was present." Italy was rent by the hatred of parties — provinces and countries stood against each other, the nobility was divided, each town made war on the neighbouring town, and within, two exasperated parties fought one against the other. " I had rather eat chalk than make peace with the Church," said the Lord of Sesso. " But," continues Brother Salimbene, who relates this saying in his chronicle, " he fed on good capons while the poor people famished. Need I say more ? The luck of the bad is not of long duration in this world, and those of the Church's side had the best of the war, and that miserable man was constrained to fly and was secretly carried away from the town of Reggio, and stinking, excommunicated, without confession, deprived of the Lord's Supper, bereft THE HOHENSTAUFEN 53 of peace he left the world, and was dug into the ground of a village near Campagnola." Among the atheists: and heretics in the sixth circle of Hell the great Florentine citizen Farinata degli Uberti lies in his fiery coffin, and to Dante's boast that the Guelfs were again victorious in Florence the shadow answers : " That hurts me more than does this bed of fire ! " At his side lies buried the Cardinal Ottaviano degli Ubaldini, who once said, " If the soul exists, I have lost mine for the sake of the Ghibellines." The fierce dissension of the parties became such a terrible and murderous plague to the land that people forgot the origin of the words, and fabled that two devils called Gibel and Guelef had been let loose from Hell to divide the world, and that from them the two parties had derived their names.* Barefoot, clad in black robes with red crosses, the pro- cessions of Flagellants marched through the country, carrying branches and flaming candles in their hands, a great number of little children among them ; they went from town to town continually crying, " Pax ! pax ! " The spectacle of those processions occasioned an enormous emotion, and filled the minds of the people with terror and confusion. The Emperor's generals, Manfred and the Marquis of Pallavicini, prevented them from entering the regions under their command, and the Lords Delia Torre, who ruled in Milan, ordered six * The names, in truth, originated from the castle of Waiblingen in Swabia, which was a fief of the Hohenstaufens, and which in Italian was corrupted into •• Ghibellino," and " Welf," a frequent name among the Saxon Dukes of Bavaria, the leaders of the opposite party in Germany. 54 DANTE AND HIS TIME hundred gallows to be raised, on which Flagellants should be hanged ; to warn them from entering the territory of their town. The tables were turned indeed, and the Emperor's had become the losing party. The victory of the Parmese, and the destruction of his camp at Victoria, the rebellion and death of his son Henry, the capture of Enzio by the Bolognese ; so many disasters following in quick succes- sion upon each other broke his spirit. None in his bril- liant House equalled him. By many of his adversaries he was believed to be Antichrist in person, and that the old prophecy, according to which Antichrist was to be born of an old nun, should seem fulfilled, they spread the fable that Constance had been a nun before she married King Henry. He was fair-haired, of graceful bearing, not very tall — none of the Hohenstaufens were — shortsighted and prematurely bald. He had been brought up in Italy, and in character was half German, half Southerner. " He was a man," the Guelf Villain says, " of great ability and bravery, erudite and of graceful deportment, universal in everything ; he understood Latin and the language of our people, German, French, Greek and Saracenic ; he was endowed with all manly virtues, generous, a courteous giver, gallant and wise in war, and very much feared by his enemies. He was voluptuous in every way and led a luxurious life, and he was a heretic and an epicurean, and he did not believe in a life beyond the grave, and therefore, above all, he was an enemy of the clergy and of the Holy Church." Even Brother Salimbene, who begins thus, " Of the true faith he had not a whit; he was sly, astute, covetous, and voluptuous, malicious, and irascible ..." and follows it up with many lines yet fuller of reproaches and a whole THE HOHENSTAUFEN 55 catalogue of various sins, concludes by saying, u Cour- teous he was, and gay, frolicsome, charming, and much gifted." He seems a most remarkable man to us also; the founder of the first state in Europe which had a modern and centralised government and administration ; for Frederic's kingdom of Sicily was the first absolute state. He was fond of pleasure and of a joyful spirit, as all Hohenstaufens were ; he liked banquets and feasts ; he was the author of several songs, passionate and endowed with talents of all kinds. There was no science in which he did not take an interest ; he was the author of books on hunting and the treatment of horses. Many renowned scholars formed part of his Court, and the library was his particular care. He sent letters to Moorish philosophers in Spain, to learn what they thought on deep spiritual questions. Jews and Saracens filled important positions at his Court, his bodyguard was composed of Saracens, and an oriental harem followed him on all his travels and expeditions of war. He was said to have talked of " the three Impostors who founded the three chief religions of the world " ; yet the same man persecuted heretics in his empire and crowned the corpse of St. Elizabeth. He may have done so from political motives, perhaps inwardly deriding himself and the spectators of the pious cere- mony. He appears to us full of contradictions, and we are unable to get at his true character because we see his reflected portrait only, the great impression which he made on the minds of men, but not his true self. It is difficult for us, almost impossible, to understand any men of those far-distant times, to analyse their character, because all that formed and influenced it is strange and 56 DANTE AND HIS TIME unknown to us ; how much more difficult to understand so complicated a character as that of this monarch, who stood on the verge of two periods ! Many of his letters are extant, but written as they are in stiff Latin, and in the ceremonious style of his chancellor, they do not betray the soul of the man. His true being remains hidden. We can only note the immense impression which he made on Guelfs and Ghibellines, Saracens and Christians alike, and that the world trembled at his steps. We may note the impression he made and the deep marks he left in the memories of men, in the numberless tales and fables, in which he plays a part no less than in the works of chroniclers and poets, and in the charm which surrounds him to this day, who, as the chronicler expressed it, " lived glorious and a wonder to all the earth until the last day of his fate, who was invincible to all, and subject only to the law of Death ! " He died in the arms of his son Manfred on Decem- ber 13, 1250, at Fiorentino, in Southern Italy. German and Saracen knights escorted the corpse, covered by a scarlet cloth, to Palermo. But the Pope wrote a letter : " Let the Heavens rejoice, and let the earth be glad." In the tenth canto of Hell the great Frederic lies in the sixth circle, with a large number of his followers in fiery coffins among those who had no faith. But in Germany the people would not believe in his death, they fabled that he had hidden himself in the mount of Kyffhauser, and would once return with the glory of the old empire. Much later, when the remem- brance grew dim, people confounded him with Frederic the Redbeard, his grandfather, who became the hero of this legend. In Italy, too, Salimbene tells, people long dis- trusted the news of his death, according to the prophecy : THE HOHENSTAUFEN 57 Sonabit et in populis : Vivit et non vivit. (Among the peoples will be said He is alive and not alive !) But the Emperor was dead indeed ; and when his sons Conrad IV. and Manfred had fallen after short reigns, and then Conradin too — each a brilliant meteor-like ap- parition — the house of Anjou came into Italy ; new wars, new times, a new era "of the world's history declared itself, the true Middle Ages were over. CHAPTER VI SOCIAL CONDITIONS The time of Dante was a time of fermentation and change in the political as well as in the economical and intellectual life of Europe. The theme of history is the development of mankind. It is the record of all the changes in the state of men which have occurred since the first evidences of our race on our globe ; all the many changes in their ways of living, of procuring food and shelter, of preserving and adorning their lives ; the changes of government, and of the relations between rulers and subjects, rich and poor* powerful and oppressed ; the changes of customs, opinions, aims, ideals, and fancies. These changes take place some- times very gradually, at others rapidly, but the most important are generally imperceptible and even if we try to trace the development either over a large territory or over a small one, we shall invariably find that it progresses at a very unequal rate, that new ideas always affect a few men first, that a few institutions are the first to be altered or to become extinct, while the mass of men grows but slowly conscious of the change. Then it spreads rapidly and its results often manifest themselves in sudden revolu- tions. The development always is more rapid in some countries than it is in others, and there again it may be SOCIAL CONDITIONS • 59 accelerated in some particular provinces or even places. It is for that reason that at all times and everywhere institutions and forms of the past — religions, laws, customs, systems of economy — are to be found, obsolete and fos- silised amidst the vital and prosperous growths of the day, while the first germs and buds of those to come already begin to sprout in the midst of the old. It is for that reason that in almost every century there are men whose thoughts become the general opinion of future generations, who are ahead of their contemporaries by decades and even by whole centuries, and others who by their views and ways of living belong to the past. Men capable of discerning which ideas and which institutions are decaying and doomed to perish, and which are still vital or destined to be victorious in the future, are very rare, and this question is at the bottom of all social and political disputes. In our own time means of communication and com- merce having reached a height hitherto undreamt of, the nations being continually mixed up and brought into touch with one another, while every event, every new dis- covery and experiment is quickly known all over the civilised world, the development is faster, as well as more evenly distributed, than it was in the Middle Ages. Mediaeval men and mediaeval institutions were more rigid | and immovable than ours, but at the same time were less uniform and monotonous. To form a fairly just conception of the immense majority of mediaeval men we must study those countries in which . in our own time, though the elements be the same, modern civilisation is least developed. In the alpine villages of Europe, remote from the great lines of communication, villages inaccessible except by footpaths and roads for 60 * DANTE AND HIS TIME ox-carts, where men live in narrowest catholic bigotry, where the priest is the only person who possesses more or less knowledge, there we shall find a state of life which will most resemble that of the Middle Ages. Certain like- nesses in the political system may be found in the feudal states of the Indian Rajahs, and still more in the Albanese parts of the Balkan, where the institutions of clans and chieftains, the continual inroads and robberies, feuds and vengeances, the general insecurity and the necessity of self-help, may remind us of very prominent features of mediaeval life. Wherever the observance of forms is most rigid and formalities are most valued, where the least amount of knowledge and the greatest superstition prevail, slow and undeveloped habits of thought combined with brutal and vehement passions, coarseness and in- sipidity in the sense of humour, cruelty in punishment and a certain unconscious respect of persons in high offices, of ceremonies and titles of all kind, there the state of men is most similar to the mediaeval state. These are certainly the darker sides of mediaeval life, but in them especially may be found the most marked difference between the civilised world of our days and the world of those times. Nobody will ever understand life as it was in the Middle Ages, to whose mind the scarcity and difficulty of com- munication, the bad and dangerous roads, the small number of highways, and as a consequence of this the wide separation of places and the uncertainty of all news, are not continually present. What to-day is an easy trip of a few hours was then a long and dangerous journey, which nobody could think of undertaking without an armed escort. The only possibility of travelling to a somewhat remoter place without running the greatest SOCIAL CONDITIONS 61 risks was to join the train of some great lord or ambas- sador who went the same way, or some great trade- caravan, such as a number of merchants undertook or equipped in common. Letters had to be sent in the same way, or by wandering monks, pilgrims, or daring pcdlers. It took months and years to send a letter and receive an answer from a distant country, and the eventual receipt of such was very uncertain. In a time like this, numerous legends and fables were certain to spread and rule the life of the day. Thus provinces and countries were more remote and separated from one another than are continents to-day, a centralised and uniform government of a ter- ritory of any extent was quite impossible : the land had to be divided and given up to the government of smaller lords and the feudal system, the splitting of countries into the countless little states of the Middle Ages was a necessary result. What are the much criticised and much derided little kingdoms and duchies of the former German Confedera- tion (which in itself was but a remnant of those times) compared to the numberless little units, states, dukedoms, city republics, dynasties, acknowledged or not by the empire, their great suzerain power, which then were to be found on the smallest area ? Who can enumerate all the more or less independent governments of Italy in the thirteenth century ? " Italy is my inheritance and the whole world knows it ! " were the proud words which Emperor Frederic wrote to the Pope in the year 1236. But, in fact, the state of things was not so clear. Only the South, the kingdom of Naples and Sicily, might be called a unified country, but its existence was not of long date. A hundred and fifty years earlier it had been divided into the Saracen and 62 DANTE AND HIS TIME Greek provinces, into the Longobard dukedoms of Bene- vento, Capua and Salerno, in the courts of which the old German Longobard language still was spoken, the Norman counties, the republics of Naples, Gaeta, Amalfi, and other smaller baronies, which all had now become fiefs of the kingdom, but remained nowise in undisturbed peace with one another. Frederic II., however, had ruled the kingdom with iron energy, he established a centralised and absolute government in it, and ever since his death it has remained the most homogeneous State of Italy. But in the Central parts and in the North we find a motley confusion. There were the States of the Church with all their contested provinces, the feudal estates of their vassals, families who were always rebelling against the Pope and always fighting with one another, then the debatable fiefs of the empire, the marquisates of Tuscany, Spoleto, Ancona, &c, the estates of the Marquises of Montserrat, of Este, of Malaspina, of Pallavicini and of the smaller Counts of the Empire, the territories of the spiritual Lords, and particularly the innumerable city- republics, many of which already began to change into civic dynasties, and whose political position, doubtful in law and of undoubted power in fact, was soon to become the most important of all. And all these powers were contested, and at war among themselves. Every territory was continually splitting up and developing smaller administrative units, every one of which instantly tried to become as independent as possible and to enlarge its estate at its neighbour's expense. There was no vassal- count who would not rather have been a Count of the Empire, no town but tried to free itself from the super- intendence of the imperial marquis and to govern itself, no bishop but wanted to be ruler and lord of his town SOCIAL CONDITIONS 63 and diocese, no city that did not strive to make its bishop a citizen and its subject. Nor was there any common established law to smooth all this confusion. All was founded on custom, prescription, old writs of princes dead long ago, privileges, statutes, and treaties, which were constantly violated and broken by the natural develop- ment of things. The only common ruler and supreme judge, the Emperor, was far away, his power fluctuating and unsteady, now in dimmest distance or of such impotence that people sneered at it, again threateningly near and terrible to all; the execution of his orders depending now on the goodwill of his subjects, again on the force and position of his army. If he had long been away in Germany he was half-forgotten ; at his Diets or at the provincial assemblies of his Legates the nobles and the consuls of the towns thronged to get the confirmation and renewal of their old rights and privileges or the granting of new ones, every demand being opposed to that of some neighbour ; troops of jurists were occupied with bringing order into the confusion, of course without any effect, when by their very profession they had to found their decisions, not on the living growth of men and institutions, but on dead and antiquated words, forms and rules which, yet more to confuse matters, were them- selves contested. Whoever was not pleased with their decision, whoever inclined to the Church, or felt himself powerful enough to do as he liked, kept aloof, and refused all obedience, taxes and military service. No emperor ever marched through the country to his capital without encountering resistance at every step, finding the door of every second town closed to him and his way ; if at all victorious, marked by the smoking ruins of burnt pities and castles. 64 DANTE AND HIS TIME Every few miles the traveller found a new government and new laws ; if he went a little farther, coinage, customs, dress, and even the language of the people were different, for the many dialects of Italy were practically so many tongues — a common Italian language for the use of well- bred people and literature had scarcely begun to develop. There is no shade in Dante's Hell or Heaven who does not at his first word recognise him as a Tuscan. Every hour almost the traveller's way was barred, and a toll, lawful or unlawful, was exacted. He might chance to be in a place which was " imperial land " and governed by an official count, that is, an officer nominated by the Emperor ; but part of it might belong to a convent or to the estate of a nobleman invested with " immunity," that is, exempt from the count's justice, but whose lords themselves dealt justice in their possessions. A little farther on, the country perhaps was subject to the republic of Florence, but the family of some feudal Count of the Empire, whose castle might be seen on the neigh- bouring hills, would claim it as his, or perhaps two towns might be quarrelling about the ownership of both village and castle, or some bishop's men might be found fighting for the Episcopal See of the nearest cathedral. The political system, under the rule of which such a state of things was possible, the mediaeval system of both govern- ment and administration, is known as the " feudal system," the system of dividing the country and bestowing it on smaller rulers. Landed estate and political power were always con- nected. The king was the greatest landlord, and there- fore sovereign of the whole country ; he granted " in fee," as it was called, large estates to the lords, his vassals, who by this were bound to be true to him and to do military SOCIAL CONDITIONS 65 service for him whenever he required it, but in all other respects were sovereigns of the land they had received ; they in turn naturally granted land under similar condi- tions to smaller lords, who in their turn leased it to peasants and serfs. The king and the greater lords also bestowed estates on their officers, so-called "fiefs of office," because they knew no other way of paying them. All these fiefs, though at first " lent " to this or that person for life, soon became hereditary, the government or the office was inherited with the estate, and estate, office and government soon became inseparably connected. This was not always the case, nor everywhere, but it was the general course things took. It was but a natural consequence that the smaller vassals felt themselves more bound to the greater vassals, their lords, than to the king, and held rather to the first, whose fathers had been served by their fathers, and who always had been nearer them, than to the latter ; in this way the feudal lords were in a position to fulfil their duties to the king only when they were friendly to him, or saw their own advantage in it, or could be forced to do so. Hence the relatively small power of mediaeval kings and the continual rebellions of their vassals ; hence, too, the powerlessness of so many Roman emperors. Infinite were the variety and the degrees of the rela- tions in which men stood to the soil, the essential, and for a long period even the only valuable, possession in the Middle Ages. The freedom or the servitude of the person always was in proportion to the amount of power wielded over the soil ; and thus numerous degrees of feudal dig- nity— (of " estates ")— may be traced and enumerated from the sovereign lord, the vassal princes, and the feudatory counts, barons, and citizens down to the " servant " or 66 DANTE AND HIS TIME retainer, the peasant, the yeoman, and finally to serfs and slaves. Numberless varieties and combinations of the individual's position and personal rights were caused by the nature of his tenure. A peasant might hold in abso- lute ownership, while a knight held of some count or baron. Again, in every profession, among officials, warriors, citizens, and peasants, men in three different positions of civil right, freemen, retainers, and serfs might be found. The natural consequence of this was, that in the course of time all these classes mingled and changed very much, but considering only one and the same period they were sharply and strictly divided, caste-like, by posi- tion, honours, and, generally, by their dress as well. The finer materials and ornaments, silk, velvet, gold, pearls, and laces, the nicer colours of red and purple generally, were reserved for the higher classes by law and ordinance. The lower had to content themselves with coarse cloth. Hence the motley aspect and the variety of colours in every mediaeval group. The Germans had by their conquest carried this system into all countries of Europe. Clumsy as it was, it was the one best suited alike to their state of culture and to the condition into which by thorough devastation they had put the ancient countries. The richly developed com- merce of antiquity had all but ceased to exist ; the ruined towns had lost all importance ; money existed but in inconceivably small quantity. Money has become too slow for the immense commercial life of to-day, and numberless paper substitutes, bank-notes, bills of exchange, cheques, and clearing-houses have been made necessary and in- vented to supersede it, but the commercial views of the Middle Ages worked with such a slow pulse that not even money was wanted to carry them out. This was the time SOCIAL CONDITIONS 67 of barter, the raw produce of the soil being the general means of payment and measure of value instead of money. Taxes and rent were paid in kind, the value of things was reckoned in it. The peasant paid to his lord a certain amount of work, fixed by the number of working-days on which he had to toil not for his own but for the landlord's profit ; then a certain number of cattle, measures of corn or wine, and the like ; the villager consulting an attorney or physician took a few fowls to pay him. Movable property, which requires sharper wit and better appliances, greater security and division of labour to make its production possible, and which to-day forms the chief part of the wealth of nations, was as nothing compared to immovable possessions, and even those were turned to account in a very primitive way. It may furnish a good picture of the time to read what revenue a Florentine nobleman of the twelfth century drew from one of his villages.* From four acres f . twelve days of work a year. „ twelve acres . Albergaria, that is, the right of the lord and consequent duty of the villagers to lodge and feed a certain number of men for a certain amount of time. „ „ „ . Six denari { and two hens. „ one farm . A hog, a lamb, fifty-two days of work, and Albergaria. „ another farm . Four soldi,§ work in the vineyard accord- ing to the landlord's need, four hens, four loaves of bread, Albergaria, and an " adiutorium," which is to be paid every third year, &c. * Reprinted from an old document by Davidsohn, " Geschichte von Florence," i. p. 308. t Starior, an old Florentine measure. % A silver coin. § A gold coin. 68 DANTE AND HIS TIME From this budget it is evident how different were the revenues from different farms ; they were obviously not regulated according to the real value of the land, but resulted from the different manner and time of acquisition, and were founded on old treaties, prescriptions, and very often on violence. But public laws were as various in different districts and towns as private rights in particular cases. Rights in general were seldom fixed by law for the whole population of a country, or at least for large classes of it, but were mostly derived from privileges granted to individuals or to corporations. Besides, there were eternal conflicts about judicial competence ; nobody could exactly know, and everybody contested, which cases the lord and proprietor could decide by his own authority, which were reserved to the tribunal of the town, or to that of the imperial officers, to which office the parties had to appeal, and what, after all, was worth decision, for it is obvious that against a powerful opponent a sentence was quite unavailing, unless the plaintiff could make himself sure of the assistance of some still greater power. The Middle Ages, therefore, were the time in which the most long-winded, undying law- suits may be found combined with and interrupted by bloody self-help. A lawsuit between the Episcopal Sees of Siena and Arezzo — and afterwards between the towns themselves too — about eighteen parishes which both bishops claimed for their own, lasted from the beginning of the eighth until the thirteenth century ; it survived all changes of governments, falls of dynasties and growths of new races ; innumerable were the acts, sentences, appeals, commissions, and wild wars which it occasioned. We must always think of mediaeval countries as of one large scene of fighting. Besides the greater wars, all the SOCIAL CONDITIONS 69 knights and villagers were constantly in arms against each other, the cause being now a disputed piece of ground and now a personal offence, an undying feud between two families, a questioned right, the dan- gerous growth of a rival town, or no cause at all but the love of warfare and plunder. In such cases it became very dangerous to leave the fortified places and walk or ride in the open country ; to work in the fields or go to church became impossible. Each of these small expeditions began by burning and devastating the houses and fields, by capturing the retainers and the cattle of the opponent; this incessant state of war became such a nuisance and ruin for the country, that in France it led to the institu- tion of the " Treuga Dei " or " God's truce." The Church commanded, under severe spiritual penalties, all men to refrain from all quarrelling from Saturday until Tuesday, and to be satisfied with the liberty of killing each other on the three days from Wednesday to Friday. Of course the prohibition was of no avail. In one of the songs of the Provencal baron, Bertrand de Born, a stanza runs thus: I, sirs, am for war, Peace giveth me pain, No other creed Will hold me again. On Monday, on Tuesday, whatever you will, Day, week, month, or year are the same to me still. The pernicious famines of the Middle Ages were a natural consequence of these incessant devastations and reprisals, which ruined enormous portions of the produce. Such was the state of things when, in their very midst, the germs of a thorough revolution began to develop by the rise and growth of cities. Men in those times had i 70 DANTE AND HIS TIME even less clear ideas of their own state and of its neces- sary consequences, of what had been and what was to be, than have we. To-day we have at least a certain know- ledge of the past, of the origin and gradual development of our own state ; we study besides all the details of the present, and therefore are in a position to recognise the direction which some of the great currents of our own time will most probably take, though, of course, we, too, are subject to the law of perspective, according to which nobody can find a right point of view from which to survey a landscape in which he himself stands, a law as true of time as it is of space. The most important social phenomenon of those times was the growth of the cities. The men in power had not the slightest presentiment of their importance, and as the powers of the past will ever do against those of the future, they instantly undertook a hopeless warfare against them. Our civilisation is founded on the institution of cities ; as we have already seen was the case with ancient culture. Only through the existence of towns and the consequent concentration of forces, division of labour, the constant friction and reciprocal influence of all forms of talent, which were impossible without them, could sufficient forces be developed and set free to produce what we call u culture." Modern civilisation also is founded and even more dependent on the existence of towns. Yet it may be said that our civilisation is already undergoing a change. The immense expansion and the rapidity of communication spreads it over the open country too, while, on the other hand, it has withdrawn in some degree from the smaller provincial towns, and has concentrated its central workshops in a few great cities with new advantages and new mischiefs. 1 '*.•:-. . ,.. iM'M • ^BifcJ i gg T^&j ;m. 1 •1 p A > t ■ • ,. fit , .* > ~*^A N // *5?5BJ r ' :■ DbHp^t'&^bP 7 ' • *--■■ 1 1 -1ft Broqi photo DANTE FROM THE FRESCO BY ORCAGNA SOCIAL CONDITIONS 71 The cosmopolitan character of those cities is in itself sufficient to be considered a symptom of a new era. Nevertheless, our civilisation is still founded on or made possible by the existence of towns, and is a consequence of town life, from which it derives its character, and not of country life. And its origins may be traced back to the twelfth and the thirteenth centuries. When the Germans invaded the empire, towns were still unknown to them ; those which they found in the conquered lands were ruined as much as possible, and the new lords of the soil took no notice of their existence. When the Longobards divided Italy into thirty-five duke- doms, they did this without any regard to the towns, and in the place of the municipal system of the Roman administration they made the county the basis of theirs, entirely disregarding the different conditions of town life and country life, and not making any distinction in the administration of either. Towns to them were places in which foolish people lived and thronged together in a curious way ; a life which necessarily appeared to them as unnatural and unhealthy as to-day that of our towns must appear to a Red Indian. But the towns recovered nevertheless ; and in that state of general confusion the greater concentration of men inside their walls gave them a stronger power of resistance ; as castles were used as places of refuge in times of danger by the peasants dwelling in their neigh- bourhood, the walls of the cities were a castle and a refuge to the whole region. In Germany towns were first founded to enable the border people to resist the inroads of the Hungarians. Remnants and indications of the old municipal constitution of the Romans seem to have been preserved in Italy in some way or other. The Latinirace, 72 DANTE AND HIS TIME too, formed the stock of the population, and the feudal system never really took root in Italy. Its institutions were but superficial, and never became so thoroughly the political constitution of the country, as, for instance, in France or in Germany. Commerce and handicraft slowly revived, and both produced a certain amount of capital. The expansion and growing intensity of the first made greater quantities of money necessary. It was coined on a large scale in the Italian towns, and from them streamed into the treasuries of princes and knights. Thus men gradually returned from barter to a monetary system of economy. In time the townsmen began to be conscious of their force, then pride and love of liberty arose in their breasts, and in the twelfth century the city communes first stood as an equal factor by the side of princes and lords, too powerful to be overlooked by Pope or Emperor. In them and around them the mediaeval features no doubt prevailed ; still, the first small beginnings of modern life were not wanting. There democracy was born after long and arduous struggles. In the mediaeval country there were but masters and serfs, in towns the idea of free citizen- ship for all had its origin. Gradually, on the devastated ground a certain amount of property available for civilisa- tion was created. As little as a man walking on a wintry night, hungry, chilled, fighting against wind, rain and snow, in constant fear of robbers and wild beasts, will think of anything but of how to get on and reach home, so little could men in the terrible struggle for life in the early Middle Ages find time to devote any part of their forces to intellectual occupations. Only the most pro- tected class of all, the clergy, could attempt it, so far as it was possible. Material goods had to be produced, better SOCIAL CONDITIONS 73 lodging and furnishing, more favourable conditions ot life, riches and greater security were necessary before sufficient intellectual force could be set free to work for itself and men enabled to enjoy life, knowledge and the production of those admirable playthings which we call works of art, and which at once are the most superfluous and the most necessary things in life. CHAPTER VII MEDIEVAL KNOWLEDGE The principal aim of every mediaeval man was his soul's salvation. Adopting the same word in an altered sense, we may say that to-day also a man's principal aim and object, even if he be not religious in a dogmatic or orthodox sense, is still the same. Instead of " salvation," say " integrity of soul " and a life as noble and fruitful as possible, and you will have expressed the aim of the greatest and best men of our era, of men like Goeth e and Emerson, or other teachers of the present time, knd though the difference is marked by the very words, though they prove how much more actual and earthly the ideal has become, the deepest meaning has remained the same. However little earthly may have been Dante's ideal, so long as he lived in this world of ours, though his sole aim may have been to prepare his soul for another world, he had to do it on earth. He, too, teaches us to purify our lives and to " lift our aims," with the sole difference that he teaches in accordance with the dogmas of the Catholic Church and uses its stern symbols in his language. But neither is an unearthly element lacking in the belief of the best and most aspiring of modern men, though their mysticism may use more universal signs, flowing symbols instead of the stiff and " frozen " forms of the Middle MEDIEVAL KNOWLEDGE 75 Ages. Yet they are able to drink the pure water of the spirit from any source, and Dante, with his severe catholic imagery, teaches them no less than he taught the disciples of his own time. But if leaving the few, who are aspiring and great- minded, we look at the multitude of men, there can be no doubt whatever that religion, its precepts, questions and forms, filled and ruled the inward and outward life of mediaeval men in a much higher degree than in our own time. Even those who led the most savage lives were seized by the terrible idea of Hell, the ardent longing for Paradise, at every moment in which they awoke from wild combats and bloodshed for the goods and honours of this earth, or from brutish and voluptuous pleasure. The time when the Son of Man had walked on earth and suffered for their redemption lay not yet so far behind them, and the flames of Hell, the glories of Paradise, stood before them in terrible reality to choose between, over- powering all their thoughts and all their feeling. Religion absorbed and embraced all other fields of life, faith was the sovereign virtue, and it was but natural that the occupation with religious questions called " theology " became almost the only occupation of the mind. A period which demands a uniform orthodox belief cannot be favourable to criticism and doubt. Without doubt and criticism true science is impossible. A thinker who is forced to arrive at certain conclusions and results cannot think freely; a man who is not allowed to adopt what he finds or thinks to be true, but must needs adopt a truth fixed beforehand and by others, cannot be an honest investigator. In fact the results of mediaeval science amount to nothing, and the reawaking investiga- 76 DANTE AND HIS TIME tion of the Renaissance had to begin afresh where antique science had halted. It is self-evident that there was neither knowledge nor science in the times of utter savagery, the time from the sixth to the eleventh century ; the so-called science, which was cultivated in convents, does not deserve the name. To be sure the convents did estimable service by pre- serving the sparks, which one day could again break into living flames. The ancient studies of the Latin part of the population had decayed, not only in consequence of the endless misery and the inroads of the barbarians, but still more perhaps through the hostile spirit of the Church, which regarded them only as tokens of pernicious paganism. Sentences from the letters of St. Paul like the following : " The wisdom of this world is foolishness with God " ; " Knowledge puffeth up " ; " Who seemeth to be wise in this world, let him become a fool, that he may be wise," had been valuable and much-used weapons against haughty philosophers who had opposed the new lore with superficial contempt. But the spirit of those sentences necessarily led to consequences inimical to science at large. As early as the fourth century, even before the decay of ancient culture, Eusebius wrote : " It is not ignorance which makes us think lightly of science in general, but contempt of its useless labour, while we turn our souls to better things." In the sixth century Pope Gregory the Great warned the Gallic bishop Desiderius in a letter to beware of the study of heathen literature, " because the praise of Christ and the praise of Jove are not compatible in one mouth." In the tenth century, the time of utter barbarism, the Abbot Leo of San Bonifazio wrote : " The successors of St. Peter wish for their MEDIEVAL KNOWLEDGE 77 teachers neither Plato nor Virgil, nor Terence, nor any other of the philosophic cattle." When in the year 999 that memorable and exceptional man, Gerbert of Rheims, became Pope under the name of Sylvester II., a man who knew the ancients, who occupied himself with astronomy and owned geometric instruments, he soon was regarded by those around him as a sinister and dangerous wizard, who had pledged himself to the Evil One to become Pope, and when he died there was no doubt in people's minds but that the Devil had really come and fetched him. Thus on every hand all powers had combined to lay waste the fields of human thought. In vain had Charlemagne and Otto III. striven to revive the schools ; neither time nor people were sufficiently ripe for it, the schools decayed, especially in the desolate Italian provinces ; a man who was able to read was a marvel, and even among the clergy boundless ignorance was often prevalent.* A change came with the eleventh and twelfth centuries ; schools and universities arose, erudite laymen were not only possible, but even began to play an eminent part in the intellectual life of the period. The amount of knowledge possessed by a generation will certainly influence the minds at least of its most pro- minent men ; and Dante, though conservative in his aims and objects, and far from being a freethinker, was cer- tainly one of the most enlightened and erudite men of the age. From the point of view of modern ideas, Dante and his works will never be understood. In the brains of