I ^/£\V y^ \m^pr'^ I - ' . ^^H .-'3.-- ^ V ^HH 1 1 .-^ s^^^^^ t ^ - r *'C" , 'r 4 1 1-* . ^ *-»• J > J ' > . ^ '".V' '^' '•'■ ->■■." •- '^ .•^4J^J' ^ ,?«5i THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH A STUDY OF THE DRINK-QUESTION BY AXEL aUSTAFSON LONDON KEGAN PAUL, TRENCH & CO., 1, PATEENOSTER SQUARE 1884 (The rights of translation and of reproduction are resented.) DEDICATION. To my wife, who has fully shared with me the hard year's work of which this httle book is the outcome, I dedicate it in gratitude and admiration for the genius and devoted labour, literary experience and skill, by which every page of it has benefited. London, May 29, 1884. PEEFACE= In the time which I have been able to devote to this work — begun in April, 1883 — it has been my endeavour to formulate with thoroughness and impartiality as to evidence, and with conscientious care and clearness as to combination and deduction, all that is clearly known and proven regarding the grave problem of alcohol and human life. At the outset of this study, I entertained, besides a good deal of general ignorance on the subject and a mass of erroneous notions, the idea that there probably existed a safe dietetic dose of alcohol ; that such a limitation in the use of alcohol could be secured by suitable legislation, and thus the rank evil of drunken- ness be stayed ; and that a proper preliminary to this end would be an inquiry into what in the various countries had been deemed the most successful systems of licensing. Vlll PREFACE. In researches which covered the examination of some three thousand works, dealing more or less directly with the alcohol question, I found excellent matter on special aspects of it, but no single work which attempted to treat of it in a comprehensive manner. The world-literature on alcohol is enormous, largely consisting of conflicting or dubious statements ; records of experiments made by different authorities reaching divergent conclusions ; cogent reasoning threaded by disintegrating fallacies ; and contradictory promulgations by one and the same author in various works, and not infrequently in different parts of the same work. Though the task of distinguishing, from among the traces along such a shore, between the flotsam and jetsam of the fluctuating tides of popular prejudices and notions, and the actual deposit marking the gradual progress of Truth's laborious but certain advance, might fitly engage far greater powers than mine, I have not felt deterred from making this earnest attempt. The general difficulty in selecting from super- abundance of material is well understood, but when the aim is to make a sound and suitable garment, three times the quantity of cloth needed does not make up for its being blemished and perforated in every yard. This has been one great obstacle in the selection and PREFACE. IX arrangement of quotations from the various authors, i.e., to winnow facts and significances from conflicting evi- dence and unsound arguments, to pick out and put into their proper relations the clearest, truest, most conse- quent dicta I could find, so as to form a whole and well-proportioned statement of the sum of experience and fact concerning this question. It will not be difficult to cite from authorities quoted by me, in one sense, other passages which may seem to modify or even perhaps contradict those I have selected. I can forestall criticism on such grounds only by saying that unconscious shuffling or deliberate equivocation on the part of an author cannot take from the intrinsic value of any truth which he has once seen, stated, and served, any more than could Galileo's recantation stop the sun. It cannot be useful to perpetuate a man's poorer and weaker words merely in order to destroy the due effect of his best utterances. And though individual inconsistencies have a certain value, it is not to them we must chiefly look for the solution of a great question of race import, but to the general tenor and character of the testimonies given by the cloud of witnesses who, whether from a mixture of motives or in single-minded- ness, have studied it ; and it is from the points of consent where scientists, philosophers, and humani- tarians have met and agreed, that we may hope to X PREFACE. begin a path toward the whole and definite truth about alcohol and man. With the avowed aim of dealing with the whole liquor question from every side and standpoint, it has not been possible within the limits of a work cheap enough to be in reach of the working classes, to deal fully with the drink question of all countries in Chapters X. and XIII., on " Social Results " and " What can be Done ? " And for many reasons Great Britain is almost exclusively considered in both these chapters, especially in the last. In each of the thirteen chapters I have tried to include only what belongs under its particular heading, and to the best of my ability, the contents of each chapter, and all the chapters in relation to each other, have been arranged and proportioned so as to bring the whole into good focus for the reader, at whatever point he may incline to take up the subject. In making quotations the following rules have been observed : — to give the title of the work, with place and date of publication ; to quote from the latest edition, and, if another work by the same author intervenes, to re-mention in full the preceding work if it is again referred to in the same chapter ; to translate the titles of foreign works into English, except in cases of classical or such modern titles as have not been included in the bibliography, or when by trausla- PREFACE. XI tion the finding of tlie worli cited would be made more dil3Scult. Such quotations as have been rendered from other tongues into the English have been mostly translated by myself, because, when I tried to use translations already made, it frequently appeared that they were inaccurate, and therefore I thought that if fault should be found with the translated portions of my book, I would prefer being responsible for my own than others' mistakes in that line. The footnotes are not less valuable in their bearing on the drink question than the body of the text from which they are eliminated for easily seen reasons, generally to prevent break or tenuity in the argument. The appendix, with the exception of the abstract from the last report of the British Commissioners of Lunacy, deals exclusively with the rights and means of legal suppression of the liquor traffic. In order to enable the reader to find any passage by the table of contents as readily as by the general index, the text has been divided throughout the book into numbered paragraphs, accompanied by marginal notes, which are found in the same order in the table of contents ; and the readiest method of utilizing the bibliography has been explained in the brief preface to it. In the preparation of this work I have received cordial encouragement and the kindest assistance from many friends of temperance reform and from many not Xll PREFACE. identified with it, to each and all of whom my grateful thanks are due, and are here warmly rendered. Among the names of those to whom I am more especially indebted for help and sympathy indispensable to my undertaking are Mr. Samuel Morley, M.P., Dr. Xorman Kerr, Dr. James Edmunds, Mr. Kobert Eae, Dr. Dawson Burns, Dr. K. Garnett, Mr. John P. Ander- son, Mr. G. W. Eccles, Mr. J. W. Leng, Mr. T. H. Evans, Mr. F. Sherlock, the Eev. Dr. de CoUeville, the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Dean of Westminster, Canon Henry J. Ellison, Earl Shaftesbury, and Mr. J. W. Kolckmann, the German publisher, all of England; to Mr. L. 0. Smith of Stockholm, Dr. L. Lunier of Paris, Baron Lynden and the Rev. A. von Scheltema of Holland. While the book has been going through the press, I have used every power and facility at my command in the labour of revision and bringing up to date. This has involved a rearrangement and transposition of portions of the contents, and through the latter some slight verbal errors have crept in, and been discovered too late for correction in this edition. As to the title of the book, though it may at first appear exaggerated and sensational, I believe it to be a scientifically accurate description of the nature and career of alcohol in the life of man. " Life never is, it is always becoming ; it is not a state, but a flow," says PREFACE. xiii Professor J, Molesehott. And of death Dr. Hufelaud says, "Generally speaking, death is not a change undergone in a moment, but a gradual passage from a condition of active to a condition of latent life." As there are many springs and foundations of life, so there are, doubtless, many foundations of death, deaths national, individual, intellectual, moral, and spiritual, as well as physical, but among them alcohol, if the true story of it is told by those who bear witness in this work, is pre-eminently a destroyer in every depart- ment of life, and therefore is truly the foundation of death. 45, Upper Gloucester Place, PoRTMAN Square, London, N.W., May 28, 1884. TABLE OF CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. DEINKING AMONG THE ANCIENTS. PAGE § 1. Difference between ancient and modern ideas of life, especially as regards drinking. § 2. Soma, and its charac- teristics. § 3. The ancient wine traditions — Myths about the vine as being the forbidden frnit — Traditions as to Noah and Satan planting the vine — Origin of the pnrple grape. § 4. Origin, history, and character of Bacchus- worship — The Eleusinian mysteries. § 5. Proofs in historic records of the destroying power of drink — Assyria, Media, Persia, Egypt, Greece, and Rome — Drinking among the Sueves, ancient Scots, Jews, and Mohammedans ... 1 CHAPTER 11. HISTORY OF THE DISCOVEKY OF DISTILLATION. § 6. Causes of ignorance regarding the discovery of distillation — Nature and meaning of distillation. § 7- China and distillation — Arabia and distillation — Geber, Rhazes, Albu- cassis, Raimundus, LuUus, and Aruoldus Villa-Novus. § 9. Reasons for the alchemists' belief in alcohol, and for the credulity of the masses. § 10. Various names for alcohol — Derivations of the word alcohol ... ... 25 CHAPTER III. PRELIMINAEIES TO THE STUDY OF MODERN DRINKING. § 11. Survey of the origin and progress of the sciences of chemistry and physiology — Aristotle's four-element theory — First establishment of the existence of chemical elements XVI CONTENTS. PAGE — Lavoisier's discovery of the basis of oxidation — The foundation of scientific physiology laid in 1850 in the cell discovery. § 12. How alcohol became a prominent subject for chemical investigation — Discovery of ethyl, methyl, and amyl alcohols — The great number of groups, series, and varieties of alcohols — The elements of alcohol — The natural sources of alcohols — The meaning and processes of fer- mentation — The nature, action, and influence of ferments on life. § 13. Date of the first discovery of the real nature of alcoholic ferments — Generation of yeast fungi — The lethal nature of alcoholic fermentation — Saccharine fer- mentation in explanation of the traces of alcohol found in water, air, and earth — Alcohol in bread fermentation — Alcohol in living organisms, plants, and animals. § 14. The tendency of alcohol to decompose into elements. § 15. The various chemical and industrial uses for alcohols. § 16. Sources of the alcohols found in drinks. — Malting — Various alcoholic drinks ... ... ... ... ... S-l CHAPTER IV. ADULTERATIONS. 17. Universality of liquor adulteration — Various poisons used in processes of adulteration. § 18. Reasons why wines are adulterated — Adulterations of Rhine wine. § 19. Port wine and sherry adulterations — The London Times on sherry adulteration. § 20. The Daily Telegraph on Spanish wine manufacture from raw spirits — The Daily Nevjs on the pending wine adulteration treaty with Spain — -Wine-forti- fying with raw potato-spirit in London docks under Government supervision. § 21. Special ills and diseases directly traceable to the adulterating ingredients in wines. § 22. Beer adulteration — Lupulit ... ... ... 46 CHAPTER V. PHYSIOLOGICAL RESULTS ; OR, EFFECTS OP ALCOHOL ON THE PHYSICAL ORGANS AND FUNCTIONS. § 23. Difficulty in fixing the normal limit of human life- Opinions of Dr. L. Herman, Dr. J. R. Farre, and Prof. P. Flourens on this point — Man's responsibility in this matter — Ignorance the chief cause and alcohol the chief agent in shortening life. § 24. The wisdom manifested in the laws controlling and preserving oi'ganic life. § 25. Chemical elements of the human body — How it is maintained — Defi- nition of food — Division of foods — The processes of uutri- CONTENTS. XVll tion. § 26. The nature and dual mission of the blood — Its constituent parts and their mission — Water the paramount need of the system — Drs. W. B. Carpenter and Austin Flint on this point— Drs. Becquerel, Rodier, and Albin Koch on the predominance of water in the blood. § 27. Definition and division of poisons. § 28. The attitude of the medical profession concerning the use of alcohol — Is alcohol food ? — Dr. Baer's statement that alcohol contains no tissue- making compounds — Dr. Klein's testimony to its worthless- ness as a food — How the idea of its being a food came about. § 29. Alcohol tried by food-tests. § 30. Alcohol inimical to life — Dr. A. Carlysle on this point — A variety of conditions qualifying the effects of alcohol on man. § 31. The hurtful effect of alcohol on nutrition twofold : viz. retardation of the processes of digestion and assimilation, and interference with the purely aqueous nature of the blood — Description of its effects on digestion — The rapidity of its entrance into the blood alone preserves the digestion from ruin — Drs. Todd and Bowman on this point — Dr. F. R. Lees' summary of the effects of alcohol on digestion — The effects of alcohol on the stomach itself — Dr. William Beau- mont's experiments on the stomach of the Canadian hunter, St. Martin — General summary of the effects of alcohol on digestion and the stomach. § 32. Preliminary comment on the effects of alcohol on the blood. § 33. Remarks on the food elements in alcoholic drinks — The Lancet on the nutritious elements in wines — Special consideration of malt liquors — The food in alcoholic drinks not in the alcohol, but in the residuals — Drs. J. W. Beaumont and T. L. Brunton on the character of the fat in the system of malt-liquor drinkers — Why Dr. W. A. Hammond regards alcohol as a food — The meaning of alcoholic preservation of tissue. § 34. Special consideration of the action of alcohol on the blood — Dr. C. H. Shulz on the nature of alcoholic degenera- tion of the blood — Dr. Dumas, the physiologists Booker and Virschow, Dr. Baer, Prof. Herman and Prof. Dogiel on the same — The effect of alcoholic degeneration of the blood on the nutrition of the tissues — Dr. Boker's experiments proving that alcohol, by retarding oxidation, tends to turn man's body into a preserved compost. § 35. How alcohol wastes and poisons the water of the system — The " drink- crave " a result of thirst — Dr. Flint on this point — The exactions made by alcohol upon the water of the system — The systemic need of water misunderstood as a need for alcohol. § 36. Alcoholic degeneration of the blood-vessels — Dr. James Edmunds on this point — Sir James Paget's warning to his disciples against surgical operations even on moderate drinkers. § 37. Theories as to what becomes of alcohol after it enters the blood current, by Baron Liebig, Drs. L'Allemand, Perrin, and Duroy, Prof. Bauer, and Drs. b XVIU CONTENTS. Bonchardat and Sandras. § 38. The difficulty of arriving at definite conclusions on this point — A solution possibly to be found in the action of hydrolytic ferments — Dr. E. G. Figg on the presence of alcohol in the breath — Dr. James Hinton's Physiology for Practical Use on the same — Alcohol discovered in skin evaporations — Drs. E. G. Figg and T. L. Brunton on this point — Alcohol found in the urine — Drs. L'AUemand, Perrin, and Dnroy, William Beaumont, John Percy, E. G. Figg, and Herr Kuyper on alcohol in the brain. § 39. Effects of alcohol on the temperature of the body — Opinions on this point by Drs. Dumeril, Dumarquay, and Lecoint, Drs. Nasse, Prout, Davies, and Edward Smith, Prof. Binz and Drs. Dujardin, Beaumetz, and Audige — Practical evidences that alcohol reduces the temperature of the body — Plausible theories for reconciling the fall of bodily temperature with the Liebigian combustion theory. § 40. Alcohol and the nervous system — Physiology of the nei-vous system — Dr. James Cantile on the character and functions of the nervous system — Parallel physiological effects of alcohol on the nervous and muscular tissues — Alcohol acts directly on the brain — Dr. Baer on this point — Possible solution of the riddle why alcohol when taken rapidly, intoxicates less and more slowly than when gradually taken, by sipping — The division of special nerve- affectants into stimulants and narcotics — Conflicting defini- tions of these terms by Dr. A. Billing, Sir J. Forbes, Drs. Headland, T. King Chambers, and T. L. Brunton — Defini- tion of stimulants and their division into invigorators and prostraters — Definition of narcotics, and their division into pseudo-stimulants and plain narcotics — Further explanation of the term pseudo-stimulants — Alcohol a narcotic poison — Dr. Thomas Trotter, in 1804, speaks of the medical con- troversy as to whether alcohol is a narcotic or stimulant — Prof. Christison, Drs. Figg, Anstie, and Edmunds on this point — The twofold narcotizing action of alcohol on the brain and nerves — Alcohol's interference with the powers of co-ordination and temporary abolition of sensation — Prof. John Fiske on incipient alcoholic paralysis — Drs. Nicol, Mossop, and E. Smith on the tendency of alcohol to paralyze vision — The quality of the brain decides the quality of its communicating powers — Dr. J. Crichton Brown on this point — Alcohol degrades the quality of brain and nerves — Dr. Parkes on the paralyzing effect of alcohol on the power of transmitting thought — Dr. Howie on the same — Dr. J. J. Eidge's experiments with minute doses of alcohol, proving its paralyzing effects upon feeling, weight, and vision — Dr. Scougal, in confirmation of Dr. Eidge, adding that the sense of hearing is similarly affected by alcohol. § 41. How the alcoholic nerve. degradation assists in pro- ducing the drink- crave — Dr. Anstie and Prof. Fiske on this CONTENTS. XIX PAGE point — general practical conclusions as to the narcotic re- sults from the use of alcohol. § 42. Dr. E. G. Figg on the injurious effects of alcohol when used as a mental stimulant — Sir Andrew Clark on the same — Mr. A. Arthur Reade's summary from one hundred and thirty-two letters on this point — The Rev. Stopford A. Brooke's testimony on this point. § 43. Proofs and opinions for the statement that alcohol reduces the capacity for physical labour — -Drs. Beddoes and Bonders, Baron Leibig, and Drs. Parkes and WoUowicz on this point. § 44. General summary of the physiological results of the use of alcohol ... ... 57 CHAPTER VI. PATHOLOGICAL EESULTS ; OE, DISEASES CAUSED BY ALCOHOL. § 45. Definitions of the terms disease and health — Dr. Huss, the originator of the term alcoholism and its division into acute and chronic. § 46. Meaning of the term chronic alcoholism — The general scope of alcoholism — Prof. Chris- tison on general diseases due to the use of alcohol — Dr. Murchison on continued fevers, and on functional diseases of the liver — Mr. Startin on skin diseases — Dr. Norman Kerr on alcohol as a cause of erysipelas — Sir William Temple, Dr. Erasmus Darwin, and Dr. Garrod on gout — Dr. Drys- dale on beer and gout — Testimony of Bromley Davenport, M.P. — Dr. B, W. Richardson's summary of the functional diseases and organic diseases from alcohol — Prof. Kraft- Ebing on alcoholic tremor — The Scientific American on general diseases resulting from beer. § 47. Dr. Huss on acute alcoholism — Prof. Kraft-Ebing on the analogy of acute alcoholic intoxication with insanity — Dr. Mason on alcoholic insanity — Mania-a-potit ; characteristics, ex- amples — Delirium tremens, its symptoms and general characteristics — Dr. Maudsley's description of delirium tremens — Prof. Kraft-Ebing on crimes committed under alcoholic hallucinations — Dr. Mason on alcoholic epilepti- form mania, on chronic alcoholic mania; on chronic alcoholic melancholia and its painful delusions — Conclusions 127 CHAPTER VII. MORAL RESULTS. § 48. Inquiry into the relations between drink and crime — Erroneous inferences of a writer in the Pall Mall Gazette on this point — Relations between sobriety and crime as contrasted with those between drink and crime — Examples XX CONTENTS. PAGE of imintentional alcolioHc criminality — The kind of drink used and the temperament and the circumstances of the drinker largely determine the character of the manifesta- tions of drunkenness — The true field of direct alcoholic criminal activity. § 49. General summary of physiological and mental results — Dr. Christoph. Wilhelm Hufeland on the difficulty of eradicating the drinking habit — Fable of the drunken man and sober pig — Physical and moral effects parallel — Notable exception to this nile — Charles Lamb's pathetic warning. § 50. The effect of alcoholism on the will — Difference between will and intention — Instance of the power of drink to annihilate the will — Moral insolvency of the drinker in the various relations and responsibilities of life : as son, citizen, neighbour, friend, husband, and father — Home of the drunken wife and mother as contrasted with the same home when the husband is the drunkard, and the wife and mother bears her burdens in patience and sobriety. § 51. The effect of alcohol in producing gradual weakening and final destruc- tion of character — Clever disguises assumed by the alcohol- ized will : in political life, for example — How alcoholism spoils the relations between master and working man and the general relations of life — Gradations produced by alcoholism : first moral unreliability, then tm'pitude and crime — The forger, the burglar, the murderer — The negative loss of will — The positive loss of will — Eev. Dr. W. E. Channing on the difference between poverty with and with- out drink — The foundation of human happiness, worth, and progress — Drink the deadly enemy of these — Drink tends, however unequally, slowly, insidiously, and with whatever delay of apparent signs, to undermine and destroy will, moral perception, conscience, affection, self-respect, and regard for others in whomsoever forms this evil habit ... 152 CHAPTER VIII. HEREDITY; OK, THE CURSE ENTAILED ON DESCENDANTS BY ALCOHOL. § 52. The laws of generation a protection to the race — The responsibility of parentage — Drs. Marc Lorin, Bourgeois, and Eigg on the general laws of heredity — The scope of hereditary effects. § 53. Various authorities on alcoholic heredity — Dr. E. Darwin, Rev. Edward Barry, Dr. Eosch, Dr. Morel, Dr. Figg, Dr. Lanceraux, Dr. Maadsley, Prof. Jaccoud, Dr. Baer, Dr. Gendson, and Dr. Kerr — Dr. Lewis D. ]\Iason on hereditary drink-crave— Prof. Kraft-Ebing on hereditary alcoholic diseases and final extinction of family ... 171 CONTENTS. XXI CHAPTER IX. THERAPEUTICS ; OE, ALCOHOL AS A MEDICINE, § 54. A sixteenth-centary opinion of alcohol as a medicine. § 55. Dr. Norman Kerr on the " Medical History of the Temperance Movement" — Dr. Higginbottom on the advan- tages of total abstinence as a prescription — The first anti- alcohol Medical Declaration of 1839, drawn up by Dr. Julius Jeffreys — Second anti-alcohol Medical Declaration of 1847, by Mr. John Dunlop — Third anti-alcohol Medical Declaration of 1871, by Dr. E. A. Parkes— Establishment of the Quarterly Medical Temperance Journal, in 1869 — The British Medical Journal concerning alcohol as a medicine, Sept., 1871 — Dr. McMurtry's eloquent appeal to the medical profession, in the Medical Temperance Joiirnal, Oct., 1871 — Origin of the third British Medical Declaration — Opinions expressed by the Times, Lancet, and Pall Mall Gazette on the importance of this document — Wording of the third Medical Declaration — General effect produced by it on the public mind — Medical opinions evoked by its publication : Dr. Henry Monroe, Dr. J. J. Ritchie, and Dr. Higginbottom — Address to Mr. Robert Rae in acknowledg- ment of his great services in the cause of temperance reform, and of the important part taken by him in getting this declaration before the public. § 56. Dr. Charles Hare on the decline in the use of alcohol as a medicine since 1872. § 57. Former and present opinions on the use of alcohol as a medicine — Points regarding alcoholic pre- scriptions and their preparations — Principal therapeutic uses of alcohol : as a stimulant, as a narcotic, as an anti- spasmodic (Dr. Edmunds on this point), as an anti-septic, and as an anti-pyretic — Dr. S. C. Smith on the comparative worthlessness of anti-septics — The Rev. Dr. Hancock on water treatment in fevers — Dr. Billing on water treatment in typhus fever — Dr. Thomas Beaumont on the same — Dr. William Cayley on the merits of cold-bath treatment in typhoid fever in Germany and France — Dr. A. T. Myers on the great mortality from typhoid fever at St. George's Hospital (1877-1883) under alcoholic treatment — The British Medical Journal's (March 1, 1884) summary of the cold-bath treatment discussions, before the London Medical Society — The exclusion of alcohol from the Dosemetric thei-apeutics. § 58. Dr. Nicolls' report on the results of sixteen years' non-alcoholic treatment of diseases in the Longford Poor Law Union — Origin, foundation, and work of the London Temperance Hospital — Dr. Edmunds' state- ment, including table, regarding the character of the non- alcoholic treatment of disease in this hospital. § 59. The XXll CONTENTS, PAGE effects of the use of alcohol on mothers and theii- offspring — Dr. Thomas Trotter and Sir Anthony Carlisle on this point — Drs. Eosch and Grindrod on the evils of the use of alcohol during lactation — Drs. E. G. Figg and E. Smith on the hurtful effects of the use of alcohol during pregnancy and lactation — Dr. Edmunds on the diet of nursing mothers, and on the special effects of beer-drinking during lactation Dr. Harrison Branthwaite on infant mortality from the use of ale and stout during lactation — Dr. J. C. Eeid's warning against alcoholic prescription ... ... ... 181 CHAPTER X. SOCIAL RESULTS; OR, THE GENERAL EFFECTS ON SOCIETY CAUSED BY ALCOHOL. § 60. General value of statistics. § 61. Inconsistency of the attitude of Parliament toward the drink-question. § 62. Various weighty opinions on the destructive effects of alcohol upon society : Bnffon, the Rev. H. W. Beecher, the Times, Dr. Germain Marty, Mr. W. E. Gladstone — Opinions of the judges of the United Kingdom : Mr. M. O'Shaughnessy, Mr. Justice Grove, Mr. Justice Fitzgerald, Baron Dowse, Mr. RafQes (Stipendiary Magistrate of Liverpool), Lord Chief Justice Coleridge, Mr. Justice Denman, Baron Huddleston, and Mr. Justice Hawkins. § 63. Mr. William Hoyle's drink statistics — The Rev. Dawson Bums on the annual expenditure in drink as compared with other expenditure in Great Britain — Mr. Stephen Bourne on the same from an opposite point of view — Mr. Hoyle's "Drink Traffic and its Evils" — Mr. Hoyle's table "show- ing the Population, Total Cost and Average Cost per Head of Intoxicating Liquors in the United Kingdom for various years from 1820 to 1870, and for each subsequent year up to 1882 " — Statements by Sir William Collins and ex- Bailie Lewis to the Scotch Temperance Convention, March 3, 1884, regarding the condition of affairs in Glasgow, due to drink — The relations between drink and poverty — Dr. Dawson Burns on drinking as the mainspring of pauperism. § 64. Parliamentary report in 1834, on in- temperance — Reports of Drs. Parkes and Sanderson, state- ment by Sir Wilfrid Lawson, address by Lord Derby, by Mr. Edward Jones of the Toxteth Board of Guardians, and by the Rev. John Kii'k, on the relations between drink and poverty — Testimony of Mr. William Hoyle, Miss Mary Bayley, Mr. George R. Sims, and Mr. Caine, M.P., on this point — Canon Farrar's sermon on drink, in Westminster Abbey, Nov. 19, 1883 — George R. Sims on Rorrihle London CONTENTS. XXIU —The "Dastman's " speech in Exeter Hall, Nov. 21, 1883 — Condition of the children of drunkards — Comparison between the revenue returns from drink in prosperous and unprosperons years — Address by Cardinal Manning — Im- portant evidence of Charles Saunders before the parlia- mentary committee on drink, in 1834 — Eeport of the special sanitary commissioner of the Lancet, in 1872 — Practical conclusions— The Daily Telegraph (Oct. 25, 1883) on Why should London wait ? — The Bitter cry of Outcast London. § 65. Mortality from drink — Statement by Coroner Wakley in 1839 — Testimony of Dr. Norman Kerr — Eeport of the Harveian Society — Sir Wm. Gull on alcoholic infanticide — Mortality among liquor-dealers; statements on this point by Dr. Kerr and Mr. David Lewis — Notice concerning publicans, issued by the General Assurance Office in 1881 — Statement of Dr. Edmunds — Relative longevity of drinkers and abstainers, as furnished by the United Kingdom Temper- ance and General Provident Institution for Mutual Life Insurance — Statement of Mr. W. B. Robinson, chief con- structor R.N., concerning the " value of life being increased by taking no intoxicating drinks." § 66. Schlegel on drink as a cause of insanity and suicide — Dr. Ganghofner's estimate of alcoholic insanity in America, England, and Holland — Dr. Lockhart Robertson's computation for England and Germany — House of Commons report for from 1865 to 1875 — Mr. Hoyle on alcoholic insanity in England and Wales — Last report of the commissioners of lunacy — Dr. Shepherd's statement — Statements by Earl Shaftesbury and Dr. Gilchrist before the Lunacy Commission of 1877 — Mr. Hoyle on the increase of alcoholic lunacy in England and Wales— Dr. T. S. Cleriston and W. J. Corbet, M.P., on the same — Sanger on alcohol as a cause of prostitution — Summary of the report on drink laid before the Belgian Chambers by Frere-Orban in 1868. § 67. Dr. Edward Young on the annual drink bill of the United States — Mr. Powell, of New York, on the liquor industry of the United States — The New York Temperance Advocate on the liquor revenue of the United States (1863-1882) — London Even- ing Standard on liquor consumption in the United States — The New York Herald on the number of liquor-shops in New York city, in 1883 — Dr. Howard Crosby on this point — The condition of Birmingham in this respect; evidence of Mr. J. Chamberlain, M.P., before the Lords' Committee on Intemperance in 1879 — The Fall Mall Gazette on the number of public-houses in proportion to the population of the various states of the union — Drs. Lee, Wilkins, and Mason on alcoholic insanity in the United States — Dr. Mann, of New York, on general alcoholic insanity — Maxime du Camp on the drink petrolomania in Paris during the siege — Dr. Baer on the deterioration in the French anny XXIV CONTENTS. FAGB caused by drink — Dr. E. Lanceranx on alcoholism and decrease in population — Dr. Baer on alcohol and insanity in Prussia — Dr. Finkelburg of the Eussian Health Com- mission on alcohol, insanity, and crime in Eussia . . . 226 CHAPTER XI. ORIGIN AND CAUSES OF ALCOHOLISM. 68. Drs. Baer and E. G. Figg on the existence of races (some of them only recently extinct) who knew nothing of in- toxicants — Origin of the mischief. § 69. Likeness between the development of the race and the individual — The in- dividual searches for happiness — The race searches for happiness — Both mistake the ignis fatuus for the Star — First gropings towards knowledge by means of the senses — Alcohol believed to be a great agent for producing happi- ness — Natural appetites and passions changed into un- natural lusts by the abnormal development of the senses • — Spiritual and mental progress under these conditions — The two great factions into which this development has divided mankind ; the graspers who succeed, the graspers who fail — Alcohol a paramount agent in restricting man to life in the world of the senses — The Eev. Dr. Crane on the Arts of Intoxication — True exaltation counterfeited by the fleeting excitement of alcohol — Self-deception has made man miss happiness all round ; in religion, in science — Illustration of this — What happiness is, and how it can be found. § 70. Supplementary causes explaining the power alcohol has obtained over mankind — The effect of high living and smoking in vitiating taste, smell, and digestion, and thereby provoking a desire for strong drink — The force of example because of the sympathetic unity of the race — Plutarch on the force of association — Thomas Tryon on the force of example upon children — T. Campbell on the influence and effects of habitual intercourse in daily life — The force of habit because of natural laws : conscious and openly acknowledged eflTects — Mr. Spurgeon on the responsibility of parents in the matter of drink — We never see our own personal danger — Dr. Wm. Ellery Channing on the responsibility of the wealthy classes toward the poor in the question of abstinence — The force of hereditary habit — Soren Kirkegaard on the force of evil habit — The force of habit become instinct — Difficulty for the race as for the individual to break the chains of habit — Difficulty of adjusting our social relations in harmony with our personal convictions — The great responsibility resting with the throne in this respect — The Canterbury Convoca- CONTENTS. XXV FACE tions (1883) on the use of wine in the Lord's Sapper — Mr. John Sebright on instinct — Mr. Herbert Spencer and Mr. Shirley Hibberd on the same — Prof. J. J. Eomanes on the force of habit-formed instinct becoming nature in a depraved sense. § 71. History waiting to say something new ... ... ... ... ... ... 283 CHAPTER XII, SPECIOUS EEASONINGS CONCERNING THE USE OP ALCOHOL. § 72. Similarity of process in body -poisoning and mind-poison- ing — The danger of half-truths — The two conditions in which man will admit that evil is evil — Hyper-sensitive individuality a great obstacle in the way of personal reform — The necessity of convincing the masses, the self- deceived as well as the honest searchers and the ignorant — The great need of general and positive knowledge on the subject. § 73. The fallacy of the boast that the virility of the English nation proves the comparative harmlessness of drink — Brief epitome of England's drink history — Bergenroth on the attitude of the English court concerning water-drinking in 1498 — Citation from Camden's Annals, 1581 — Dr. William Bullein, in speaking of the evils of drink in 1595, makes no mention of distilled liquors — Citation from the Compleat Gentleman (1622) ; from Tryon's Way to Health, Long Life, and Happiness (1683)^ — Hard drinking not common in England until the seventeenth century — Citation from De Foe's Poor Man's Plea ; from Sir John Harrington's Nugce Antiquce ; from Bishop Benson in Lecky's History of England (1878) — The Rev. Dr. Dawson Burns on the specious arguments used to prove that the commission of crime in so-called sober countries, justifies the assumption that drink is not at the bottom of most of the crime committed in Great Britain. § 74. Habitual drunkenness universally condemned — Moderate drinking the nucleus of dispute — No fixed standard of moderation possible — Dr. John Cheyne on this point — Fourteen glasses of wine daily, the moderation limit of a German temper- ance society in the sixteenth century — In our day modera- tion entirely optional — The elasticity of the term as seen in its usual definitions — The Lancet on publicans, and specious reasoning about moderation— The practical worth- lessness of the plea of moderation — Dr. Grindrod (Bacchus, 1839) on moderate drinking as the preparatory stage of drunkenness — Dr. J. Baxter on moderate drinking — Drs. Copland, Gamett, James Johnson, Macrorie, Gordon, Sewall, Sir Henry Thompson, Sir William Gull, and Dr. W. B. XXVI CONTENTS. PAGE Carpenter on the same — The late Samuel Bowly on moderation versus total abstinence — A valuable suggestion by Mr. C. Kegan Paul — The deceptive character of the relief attributed to the moderate use of alcohol in cases of exhaustion from labour. § 76. Dr. R. B. Grindrod on the effects produced by moderate drinking upon temper and judgment — Dr. Baer on the effects produced on mental processes by alcohol — Dr. Hewitt on the character of moderate drinking among the French — The moral respon- sibility of the moderate drinker — The Rev. Stopford A. Brooke on this point — The Rev. James Smith in refuta- tion of the argument that moderation is better than absti- nence — C. Kegan Paul on the same point — Charles Lamb's warning appeal to young men. § 77. Dr. Howard Crosby's objections to the temperance pledge, and Mr. Wendell Phillips' reply. § 78. The fallacy of positive deductions in arguing the general from the exceptional — Examples — The meaning of the plea for longevity ... ... 305 CHAPTER XIII. ■WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 79. Why past temperance efforts failed — Their character — Early moderation societies — Special reasons for their failure — Characteristics of the modem temperance move- ment the basis for hope of permanent reform — Initiation of the present popular temperance movement ; how it pro- gressed, collapsed, and revived. § 80. Summary of the character and extent of the powers and obligations of the British Government in internal reforms — The sovereign power and hence responsibility of the masses — The people responsible for the moi'ality of Parliament and Government, not the Government for that of the people. § 81. Dangers attending political agitation on moral issues — The para- mount importance of sobriety for the protection of national independence — The battle of Hastings lost through drink — The Echo on drunkenness in the army — Lord Wolseley on the army and drink— Cardinal Manning on the same — Major-General Sir Evelyn Wood in confirmation of Cardinal Manning's statement. § 82. Mischiefs that have resulted from prematurely driving the liquor-dealers into self- defence unions, by indiscriminate political agitation for prohibition — The earliest moment when prohibition can become a practical and beneficent fact — The hopeful omen of the Queen's speech opening Parliament, ISS^. § 83. Various preparatory measures for general prohibition — Local option : Sir Wilfrid Lawson's scheme — The local CONTENTS. XXVll option resolution of the great temperance meeting in Edin- burgh, March 3, 1884 — The attitude of the Government toward it — The question of compensation to the publicans — The publican's side of the question — The public's side of the question— A hint to licensed victuallers how to pre- pare themselves and their houses for the inevitable- Scheme for reconciling the conflicting interests involved in prohibition with due regard to health, morality, and revenue. § 84. The paramount duty of the Government regarding exportation of liquor, and particularly in case of internal prohibition — Mr. Robert Rae on this point — Cete- wayo's remonstrances with England — The liquor treaties with Siam and Madagascar in 1883. § 85. National slavery under the liquor revenue — Brief summary of the history of licensing — ^The Grocers' Licence Act ; the Saturday Review, the Practitioner, the Spectator, the Alliance Neivs, and the Lancet on the various evil results of this Act — The attitude of the Church of England Temperance Society toward it ; Canon Leigh's advice to the Women's Union to boycott liquor- selling grocers — The Temperance Record on the increasing intemperance among women as being largely due to the Grocers' Licence Act — Mr. George R. Sims on the social effects of the grocers' licences — The most pressing reason for the repeal of the grocers' licences. § 86. Various lesser legislative measures ; restriction of the power of renewing licences ; low windows compulsory for public-houses ; pro- hibition of the employment of women as bar-tenders — Public conveyances should neither bear the names of, nor have their stations at, public-houses — -Canon Ellison on juvenile intemperance in Liverpool and Manchester — In- stances of juvenile intemjaerance cited by the Daily News, December, 1883 ; by the Glohe — Imprisonment a proper penalty for the crime of selling or giving drink to children — The Lancet's opinion on this point — Early habits and home example largely responsible for the prevalence of this vice among adults. § 87- Sir William Armstrong on prohibition of the propagation of vice and poverty. § 88. Dr. Norman Kerr and the Dalrymple Home — Dr. Thomas Hawksley on the cure of habitual drunkards — The Lam- beth Board of Guardians on the necessity of reform in the Habitual Dmnkards' Act. § 89. The need of international relations in view of thorough drink legislation — The need of international agreement for the general suppression of liquor traffic on the seas. § 90. Need for the establish- ment of a permanent national commission of inquiry into the whole question of alcohol and man. § 91. The origin and establishment of temperance coffee-tavems in England — Their character and usefulness — The prominent part taken by Mrs. George Bayly in this movement — Reasons for the poor results of the coflee-taverns in London — The XXVIU CONTENTS. Daily Chronicle on the mismanagement of these establish- ments — Sugo^estion for merging the coffee-tavern project into that of the steam-kitcheu — first efiPorts and progress of the steam-kitchen movement on the Continent--Mrs. Lina Morgenstern's steam-kitchen in Berlin — Mr. L. 0. Smith's steam-kitchen in Stockholm, and his own account of their importance and work. § 92. Pure water the greatest essential for life and health — Mr. Thomas Tryon on water, 1697 — Dr. George Cheyne on the same, 1725 — Water ordinance in Antwerp — The agitation for pure water supply- in London during the last twenty-five years — A writer in the Pall Hall Gazette on the present quality of the water supply in London — The New York Medical Record on water for infants— Dr. James Wilson on the therapeutic proper- ties of water — The Lancet on water-drinking — Dr. Plohn's bibliography on water in Dr. Ziemssen's Handbook of General Therapeutics — Interesting testimony of Dr. Morel to the recuperative power of natural functions when perversions of them are desisted from. § 93. Importance of instruct- ing children to understand their own bodies, especially in regard to the harm alcohol does to them — Testimony of the Lord Bishop of Exeter ; of the Eev. Dr. Adamson, of the Edinburgh School Board — Why the popular education system is poor — Leon Dounat's estimates of the relative amounts expended on education and war by the European powers — Ex-Bailie Lewis on the inadequacy of the Com- pulsory Education Act, and of sanitary agencies to uproot or essentially diminish the vice and misery produced by the public-house — Dr. Channing's definition of education; his views on the true use of wealth — Temperance teachings in the schools of Massachusetts, 1872 — Labours of the National Temperance League for the spread of temperance education — Cardinal Manning's order for the establishment of branches of the Catholic Total Abstinence League in every Catholic school in the Archdiocese of Westminster — Efforts to establish temperance education in German schools, and in the schools of Canada, Australia, and the United States — The school savings-bank system in Sweden — Poverty the worst enemy of popular education, and drink the chief cause of poverty — Statement by Mr. E. N. Buxton, chairman of the Loudon school board — Statement by the Right Hon. Mr. Mundella on drink in its bearing upon education — Poverty will never yield until drink is removed — Mr. Gladstone on poverty, House of Commons, 1843 — Lord Salisbury's suggestions for the alleviation of poverty. National Review, November, 1883 — Mr. Cham- berlain on the same topic. Fortnightly Review, December, 1883 — Dangers from supplanting moral impetus by mere political agitation — Earl Shaftesbury on the mischief of State aid, Nineteenth Century, December, 1883 — Earl CONTENTS. xxix Shaftesbury's statement that " it is impossible, absolutely impossible, to do anything to permanently or considerably relieve poverty until we have got rid of the curse of drink" — A working man's letter suggesting the establishment of a Government Labour Registry Office, Daily News, Decem- ber, 1883 — Sober working men's relief banks — Mr. Francis Peek on the responsibility of the rich in the question of poverty and drink — Mr. Henry George's scheme of land nationalization as a cure for poverty — Neither time, con- ditions, nor people prepared for it — The foundation of any individual or national regeneration must be laid in temper- ance — Suggestions as to what might be expected supposing land nationalization should be accomplished without tem- perance reform — Evening Standard' s account of the scenes on Brighton beach after the wreck of the Simla — Similar scenes following the rescue of the cargo of the wrecked Royal Adelaide — Mr. Joseph Cowen on the paramount im- portance of sobriety. § 94. Di*. Channing on the reform- ing power of innocent pleasures and amusements — The power and province of the stage in this direction — The moral and refining influence of the Princess's Theatre under the management of Mr. Wilson Barrett — The late Duke of Albany on the duty of the rich in providing pleasure for the poor — The Newcastle Chronicle on the provision of amusements as a check on drink and crime. § 95. The great responsibility resting upon magistrates, physicians, and the clergy in regard to the drink evil — The responsi- bility of the Church in regard to the drink evil — Origin and growth of the Church of England temperance move- ment — Appeal to the Lords' Committee of 1880 by Canon Henry J. Ellison, for effective legislation in favour of tem- perance — Archbishop Benson's position regarding temper- ance reform — Purposes and mission of the Church of Eng- land Temperance Society — The Bishop of Carlisle on the success of the labours of this society, St. James' Hall, November 20. 1883 — Canon Basil Wilberforce in denuncia- tion of Church proprietorship in public-houses — Practical expression by the Ecclesiastical Commissioners of their interest in the promotion of temperance and education. Temperance Record, November 8, 1883 — The question of the use of wine in the Lord's Supper — Decision of the Upper House in the Convocations of Canterbury, July, 1883 — Modern discoveries, as to the nature and effects of alcohol, leave the conscientious clergyman no alternative — The Rev. Moses Stewart on total abstinence as a qualification for Church membership — The Rev. B. Parsons on the con- stant risks incurred by attendance at the Lord's Supper — Mr. E. C. Delevan on the use of wine in the Communion — Archdeacon Jeffreys, of Bombay, on the same — The Lord Bishop of Exeter and Canon Wilberforce on the same; XXX CONTENTS. various important considerations involved in this question. § 96. Dr. Channing on drink customs — The origin and age of the drink customs — Strutt on the same — The Queen's opposition to the social bondage of the drink customs ; her insight into the national dangers from drink, and her sym- pathy with temperance reform — The interest manifested by the Prince of Wales in the temperance reform — The interest shown by the late Duke of Albany in the condition of the poor and in temperance reform — The practical in- auguration of drinking toasts in water, by the Metropolitan Board of Works, 1883 — Toasts drunk in unf ermented wines at the inauguration luncheon of the Society for the Study and Cure of Inebriety, April 25, 1884 — Prince Puckler on the absurdities of the drink customs — The Rev. B. Parsons on the same ; a working man on the same — The Eev. James Smith on the same — Success of Mr. Samuel Morley, M.P., and of Earls Shaftesbury and Stanhope, in securing the abolition of the custom of the payment of wages at public-houses — The Eev. Wm. Moister on the variety and prevalence of social drinking habits — 'Dr. J. G. Holland on the duty of society in this respect. § 97. Dr. Chapin on the responsibility of wealth for the prevalence of the drink evil — Lord Claud Hamilton's statement (St. James' Hall, May 19, 1870) concerning the pi'ohibition estate in Tyrone — Evidence of Mr. T. W. Russell on the prohibition estate of Bessbrook ; Mr. J. G. Richardson's evidence on the same — Statement of Mr. A. E. Eccles concerning the prohibition village of White Coppice — The Saltaire prohibition estate — The prohibition real estate companies of Mr. John Roberts in Liverpool, and the Artisans and Labourers' General Dwelling Company in London — Pall Mall Gazette on this point — Mr. Hepworth Dixon's description of the results of the prohibition in St. Johnsbury, Vermont — Success of prohibition in the town of Pullman, U.S.A. § 98. Temperance measures which might be adopted by the wealthy railway companies of Great Britain — Dr. J. G. Holland on " Rum and Railroads " — The lead taken by engineer George Stephenson — Action by the West Lancashire Railway Company in this direction— Growing success of the total abstinence movement on the Midland line, and in the Railway Union at large — Oatmeal drink supplied by the Great Eastern Railway Company to their employes — The Toronto Globe, February 6, 1884, on "Drinking and Positions of Trust " — Mr. W. J. Spicer's circular to the Grand Trunk Railway — Mr. Bronson Howard's account of the origin of temperance reform on the lakes and the ocean. § 99. Suggestions made by Mr. Samuel Morley, M.P., that an Abstainer's Union should be attached to every commercial concern — Action of the aristocracy of England in favour of the Blue Ribbon movement and other temper- CONTENTS. XXxi PAGE ance measures — The significance of the Blue Ribbon move- ment — Mr. Gladstone on the significance of the Blue Ribbon movement. § 100. The plan and organization of the Tem- perance Federation of Great Britain, 1883. § 101. The foundation of all temperance reform lies in individual character and worth — The hope of temperance reform, like the hope of all other refonns, is vested in love, labour, humility, and unselfishness ... ... ... ,..331 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. A STUDY or THE DEINK QUESTION. CHAPTER I. DRINKING AMONG THE ANCIENTS. § 1. Whether we look at the individual, family, com- munity, nation, tribe, or race of man, human advancement seems always to liave been surest and most tliorougli when the lessons of the past have been allowed to bear fruit in the present. The Drink Question is a problem co-extensive with almost the whole preserved history of mankind ; and although opinions may be divided as to the effects of drink in our day, that the past must furnish valuable suggestions on this point will not be disputed, and therefore some knowledge of the past history of drink is a necessary preparation for the study of this question in the present. In trying to form some notion of the drinking habits of the ancients, it is necessary to keep certain facts in mind, facts pei'taining to their time and status, and almost wholly absent from ours. The ancient mind in its general tendency towards Difference mysticism and away from materialism — the reverse of the between an- mind of to-day — revered all unexplained phenomena, wor- modem ideas shipped all those numberless forces and force manifesta- e|a\'f'''as^^' tions which it could not master or account for, and stood in regards awe before the, to them, — yes even to us, — essentially veiled '^"'^''•"s- principle of intoxication. This awe of the phenomena of intoxication is the one characteristic of ancient nature- THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. •worship wLicli perhaps better than any other illustrates the truth that external nature — being always essentially the same, and impressing man in each age according to the intelligence of that age in essentially the same manner — infused into the religions of the past a striking similarity. Distillation was unknown among the ancients (ex- cepting possibly the Chinese), and therefore they could know nothing of our distilled liquors, brandy, whisky, gin, rum, liqueurs, etc. Another thing to remember is that though they had fermented drinks, such as soma , and grape, palm, fig, pomegranate, apricot, and grain wines, they held, in their childlike veneration of the unknown, a superstitious reverence for fermentation, while their very ignorance of its causes and processes made it exceedingly difficult for them to preserve their fermented drinks from turning into vinegar. But as the ancients, ignorant of distillation, could not, as is now the practice, fortify their wines with distilled spirits, their most common drinks must have been unfer- mented juices, either pressed direct from the fresh fruit, or from juices boiled down and kept in skins or earthen pots and jars, deposited for coolness in the ground or under water ; or extracted from dried grapes — raisins soaked in water, etc. Their fermented drinks likewise were usually boiled down and kept as the unfermented. As to the strength of their fermented drinks, it seems probable that then, as now, the average was below 15 per cent, of alcohol, but here it must be remembered that the ancients rarely drank fermented wines undiluted, and when they did so, were in the habit of drinkiog copiously also of pure water ; and also that the art of adulteration, now perfected almost beyond the possibility of detection, was then very little understood or practised ; for certainly the aromatizing with spices, and sharpening with tar and other substances, as practised by the ancients, cannot be held comparable, for their intoxicating or poisonous effects, with our modern scientific and most unscrujjulous mysteries of drink concoctions. Again, the drinking of fermented liquors was largely a religious rite with* the angjysnts ; their banquets were even opened with propitiatory or grateful libations to the deities. DRINKING AMONG THE ANCIENTS. 3 while ;wg nse our numberless and highly alcoholized drinks as social and physical stimulants and an odyn es. In a word, the fermented drinks of the ancients were but little adulterated, almost invariably diluted, and asso- ciated with a reverential, if undeveloped and mystic worship. While we use both fermented and spirituous liquors, highly adulterated, and " fortified," and drink not to God, or with religious aspiration, but to please the palate, excite the senses and passions, ki ll tim e, forget sorrows, deaden anxiety, drown conscience, and gain brute courage for infamy and crime. § 2. The vai'ious ancient religions have come -with apparent spontaneity to remarkably similar conclusions as to the origin and history of their intoxicants. For instance, somcAvhere in the great records of the East Indians, it is related that the plant from which the soma draught was prepared, Avas brought down from heaven by a falcon ; and a legend among their antipodes, the Huron Indians of North America, also ascribes tKe origin of their intoxicant — the tobacco plant — to heavenly intervention. In the Rig-Vedas {rig, verb, to praise, and veda, knowledge) the Brahminic Bible and — according to our best Vedic scholars. Professors Miiller and Von Roth — the greatest and truest of extant records * of our East Indian progenitors, we find that they had two kinds of intoxicating drinks, soma and sura . Soma (the name of the moon, and also of the king of important plants) is at present a plant unknown. From the juice ddnk'history of it, the V edic people prepared an intoxicating drink. ofour Vedic It has been asserted by some that an intoxicating drink that has been for a long time back prepared by the Indians from the juice of Sarcostemma acidum, is the same as the ancient soma ; but this can scarcely be so, as som^a was a pleasantly sweet drink, whereas the Sarcostevima product is a disagreeably bitter one, and to Europeans quite intolerable. * It is known witli certainty that the Rig-Vedas have remained just as they now stand in John Mnir's Original Sanscrit Texts, for nearly three thousand years. But before their collection, which was probably made yet a thousand years earlier, these hymns had been only orally transmitted, the oldest evidently for some fifteen hundred or two thousand years. 4 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Then again, Sarcostemma does not grow in the Seven River Land, the home of the Vedic peoples. Sura, probably the wine of rice, was not common among them, not nsed, at the sacrifices, and its use, never in high favour, is often condemned in the Vedas. The real Soma was worshipped as containing the vivifying prin- character of ^iple of the universe. It was therefore an essential to the soma, and ^ i ^ _ -, ,^ the indifa- gods, Dut as it grew on the earth the gods had to descend worship. thither to receive it. And they were supposed to do this at the daily sacrifices which took place at sunrise, noon, and sunset. In some recent writings on the drink question it has been asserted that our Vedic ancestors were really a set of drunkards, and citations from the numerous hymns to Indi'a have been made in proof of this assertion. Bat the most authoritative interpretations of the Vedas do not sustain this charge. As pure worshippers of the great phenomena of nature our Vedic forefathers were enthusiastic lovers of light and fearers of darkness. Indra was the favourite god of the Vedic nations, and therefore, in spite of his being regarded as the youngest, received a very great number of hymns in praise of his lofty attributes of wisdom and strength. Yet with this mass of hymns to search among. Oriental science has not yet reached unanimity of opinion as to what special contemplation of nature lies at the foundation of Indra-worship. But by such evidences as the hymns contain, and also by supposed etymological derivations of Indra's name — the word Indra is cognate with certain Sanscrit words meaning blue — a majority of authorities incline to think that Indra signified the personification of the blue heaven reigning over and dispersing the rain- clouds by combat with supposed cloud-giants, which Indra, or the blue heaven, destroys, setting free the waters they had held captive. This seems to clearly explain why the god Indra was always by his devotees assumed to be exceedingly hungry and thirsty : — " Heartily, as a friend serves a friend, the fire broiled For him, with its great power, three hundred cattle, And with these, that he might have strength to slay the dragon, Indra drank three lakes of soma, i^ressed by man." V. 29, 7. DEIXKING A3I0NG THE AXCIENTS. How natural that the Vedic peoples, in their worship of the god whom they conceived to be their saviour from terrible droughts and famines, should be eagerly anxious to supply him with as much soma (universal life-essence) as he required for the performance of his blessed office. Of course so much of the soma as was not poured on the sacrificial fire, the melting butter, horseflesh, or other offering, was probably not thrown away. But even fi-om this it cannot be fairly construed that gross drunkenness was common, for the priests were evidently not a numerous body. Another thing to be considered is the fact that though Unique we possess no practical knowledge of soma, the Vedas of soma, furnish abundant unanimous testimony to its unique properties. Besides its agreeable and refreshing qualities, it must have had certain properties wholly unknown in any other intoxicants. Indeed, the Eig-Vedas tell us that soma was a power in favour of morality, having the effect of intensifying and concentrating the moral impulses, which cannot be said of any now known intoxicant ; nor, so far as I have heard or read, has this effect been claimed for any other intoxicant. For example, we read (translated freely, but with faith- ful literalness as to the meaning) in the Rig-Veda (x. 25), this hymn of praise and adjuration to soma : — " Awaken in us a noble nature of heart ! Quicken us with understauding and knowledge, So that thy friendship may be unto us, Juice, As unto the cows is the grass of the meadows. " Everywhere over the whole earth the people, By thy heart's grace, are softened and blest ; So strives also my longing towards thee, That I too may receive of thy favour. " Over our herds is thy watch kept, Juice, As they move numberless in the fields. On each thing that hath breath of life thine eye Gazes, and thou givest it strength to live." Such is the light which the Big-Vedas themselves throw upon the ^question of the effects of soma drinking, and if a kind of inebriation attended the habit, it seems to have been distinct in nature and consequences from what is THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. meant by drunkenness in our day, for there is both aspira- tion toward, and expectation of great good, such as could never have been expressed after even only one experience of the effects of drunkenness as we know it, with its appalling headaches, its dullness, lethargy, melancholy, and incapacity. The above verses — and the Vedas furnish many more of a like significance — are a pean to soma as the source of light and strength. Nowhere in modern Bacchanal song is such a key-note struck. But even were soma intoxication essentially the same as modern drunken- ness, the som^a drunkard, believing in soma as the drink of his deities, and as a source of inspiration and energy, is morally far above the modern drunkard. The sura, on the other hand, as we find in Indian history, became later a national curse, so that the great moral reformer, Manu, who lived six hundi'ed years before Christ, found it necessary to impose the severest penalties on sura drinkers. For instance, he directed that those who relapsed into the habit after once abstaining, should be compelled to drink some of it while it was ignited. § 3. Just as many of the legends and traditions of the traditions, polytheistic nations of antiquity taught that the intoxication- giving substances were direct favours of heaven to man, so likewise do several of the traditions and legends belonging to the monotheistic beliefs of antiquity point to Paradise as the land of the grape ; some, indeed, claiming the vine as the tree of good and evil, and Noah as the planter of the only grape saved from the Deluge. Let us take a glance at the ancient wine traditions of that great race which, though for close on tw^o thousand years a landless people, and numbering in Europe accord- ing to the latest census only five and a half million souls, and spread over all lands, yet maintains a coherent organiza- tion, successfully avoiding amalgamation with or absorption by other nations or races, keeping its own interests intact while rivalling the Christian world in many aspects, out- flanking her in some and commanding her in others — the Jews. No country is better adapted for vine culture than the plateau of Palestine, but since the Mohammedan occupa- tion this has been restricted to a few localities, the principal being in the environs of Hebron. Ancient wine- DRINKING AMONG THE ANCIENTS. 7 Vine culture was very flourishing in the independent days of Israel, and wine was the chief product of the country, and a fruitful theme of its traditions. Kotzebue, in his Journey througli Fersia, says that all the reasonings of the ancients on the subject seemed to indicate the Promised Land as the native country of the vine, and even the Greeks in their mythology, place the inventors of wine in S}Tia and the adjacent countries. At the present day a spot near Mount Ararat is still sho\\Ti as the place where Noah is said to have planted the first vine. The Talmud — that gigantic collection of teachings, Myths about statutes, laws, traditions, legends, etc., peculiar to the beLgthe^for- Jewish race — enlarges npon the statements concerning bidden fruit, man's earliest existence as given in those much pondered- on, succinct, yet baffling first chapters of Genesis, and records of the Rabbi Jehuda that he thought the vine was the forbidden fruit.* But the Jews are not alone in the belief that wine Various caused the fall of man. The eniifl^nt theologian, Dr. °Pi|,°Jcaused' Lio^tfoot, is said to have held this idea, and Mr. More- the fail of wo^ . in his thoughtful work on Inebriating Liquors "*°" (Dublin, 1838), makes the pertinent suggestion that Milton probably entertained- some such opinion when, in Paradise Lost, he wrote of the fj^iiL " whose mortal taste brought death into the world, and all our woes." " Soon as the force of that fallacious fruit That with exhilarating vapour bland About their spirits had played and inmost powers Made err — was now exhaled." But nearly thirty years before the appearance of Paradise Lost there was published in London (1638) an incon- sequent and shallow little work — though significant in this connection — written by one Dr. Whitaker, entitled The Tree of Human Life, or The Blood of the Grape, etc., which opens in these words : — " This subject is blood, in that is life ; it is of the vine and that is the plant of life, * It is curious to find that, according to the Eev. Baring Gould's Legends of Old Testament Characters, from the Talmud and other Sources, the inhabitants of the island of St. Vincent thought that the tobacco plant was the forbidden fruit. THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. and if I should say a species of that was in Paradise, my opinion might not in all places and amongst all persons be rejected . . . for as that (the forbidden fruit) was called the tree of life, so is the vine, and they do not only agree in the appellation but in their nature and effects also." Morewood (op. cit.) says that the Madagascar natives believe that " the four rivers of Paradise consisted of milk, wine, honey, and oil, and that Adam, who required no sustenance, having, contrary to God's command, drank of the wine and tasted the fi-uits, was driven from the garden and subjected to the punishments entailed on him and his postei'ity." Many learned theologians, both Jew and Gentile, hold that drink existed before the Flood, and that the Deluge came as a Nemesis for excessive drinking, basing this belief on the words of Jesus : " For as in those days which were before the Flood they were eating and drinking . . . and they knew not until the Flood came and took them all away." — Vide Matt. xxiv. 38, 39. Other Jewish doctors say that the vine which Noah planted was one which the Deluge swept out of Paradise ; a sprig from that Noah, findino' it, planted it, and that in the very same day m which it was planted it grew up, bloomed, and bore fruit, which Noah pressed, and swallowing its juice became drunken.* * Adam Pabroni, an Italian writer of tbe eighteenth century, in a work on the Art of making Wine, attributes to Mutardi-ben-Yasif, an Arab author (13 f. 10), the following curious legend of the vine : — " Noah, being come out of the ark, ordered each of his sons to build a house. Afterwards they were occupied in sowing and in planting trees, the pippins and fruit of which they had found in the ark. The vine alone was wanting, and they could not discover it. Gabriel then informed them that the devil had desired it, and indeed had some right to it. Hereupon Noah summoned him to appear in the field, and said to him, ' Oh, cm'sed ! why hast thou carried away the vine from me ? ' * Because,' replied the devil, ' it belonged to me.' ' Shall I part it for you ? ' said Gabriel. ' I consent,' answered Noah, ' and will leave him a fourth.' ' That is not sufficient for him,' said Gabriel. ' Well, I will take half' replied Noah, ' and he shall take the other.' ' That is not sufficient yet,' responded Gabriel ; ' he must have two-thirds, and thou one ; and when thy wine shall have boiled upon the fire until two-thirds are gone, the [remamder shall be assigned for your use.' " Dr. F. E. Lees, in his Temperance Text-Boole (London, 1884), cites Beliefs that the Deluge wasapunish- ment for drunkenness. That the vine which Noah planted was DRINKING AMONG THE ANCIENTS. 9 As to the planting of the vine by Koah, the TaMud ^|^^'^'"°'^^ °^ and other Jewish writings give essentially similar descrip- satan piant- tions. In Baring Gould's (op. cit.) the following version '"g*'^*' ^i"*'- is quoted from Jalkut, Genesis folio 6a : — " Bowed under bis toil, dripping with perspiration, stood the patriarch Noah labouring to break the hard clods. All at once Satan appeared to him and said, ' What new undertaking have you in hand, what new fruit do you expect to extract from these clods ? ' " ' I plant the grape,' answered the patriarch. " ' The grape ! Proud plant ! Most precious fruit ! Joy and delight to men ! Your labour is great, will you allow me to assist you? Let us share the labour of producing the vine.' " The patriarch in a fit of exhaustion consented. Satan hastened and got a lamb, slaughtered it, and poured its blood over the clods of earth. ' Thence,' said Satan, ' shall it come that those who taste of the grape shall be soft spirited and gentle as this lamb.' " But l^oah sighed. Satan continued his work ; he caught a lion, slew it, and poured the blood upon the soil prepared for the plant. ' Thence shall it come,' said he, ' that those who taste the juice of the grape shall be courageous as the Hon.' Noah shuddered. " Satan continuing his work, seized and slew a pig and drenched the soil with its blood. ' Thence shall it come,' the following from a still earlier work (tlian Fabroni's), Letters Writ hy a Turkish Spy (London, 1693) : — " Noali and his sons planted all sorts of trees, but when they came to look for the Vine, it could not be found. Then it was told Noah by the Angel, that the Devil had stolen it away, as having some right to it. Wherefore Noah cited the Devil to appear before the Angel ; who gave judgment that the Vine should be divided between them into three parts, whereof the Devil should have two [as much as to say that its fermented wine does twice as much evil as good] — to which both parties consented. This was the decision of Gabriel : That when two-thirds of the liquor of this Fruit should be evaporated away in boiling over the fire, the remainder should be lawful for Noah and his posterity to drink. And thou knowest that we Mussulmans generally obey this law in preparing our Wine. Let the Devil, therefore, in the name of God, have his share in the tempting fruit, for when that which inebriates [the al-ghol, or evil-spirit] is separated by fire from the rest, this liquor becomes pure, holy, and blessed. This is the sentence of the ancients." — Vol. v. Lett. 12. 10 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. said he, ' that those who drink of the juice of the grape in excess, shall be filthy, degraded, and bestial as swine.' " Dr. J. Hamburger * gives a similar version : — " As Noah was occupied planting the vine, Satan drew near. ' What do you plant there ? ' he asked. 'A vine,' said Noah. ' Of what kind ? ' ' Its fruit is sweet,' replied Noah, ' whether fresh or dried, and it also gives wine which rejoices the heart of man.' ' So ! Let us be comrades in this planting,' said Satan. ' So be it,' answered Noah. Satan then went away and returned with a lamb, a lion, a pig, and an ape, which he killed one after another so that the vine should be di-enched with their blood. Then turning to Noah he said, ' These are the signs of the power of wine. We see man before he has taken wine as innocent as the lamb ; but soon after enjoying it, he is subjected to various changes. The temperate enjoyment of wine makes him brave as a lion, the intemperate use of it turns him into a pig.' " Colin de Plancy gives a Mussulman tradition as follows : — "When Ham had set out the vine, Satan brought and poured upon it a peacock's blood. When its leaves began to appear he poured over them the blood of an ape ; when the grapes began to form he watei-ed them with the blood of a lion, and upon the ripe fi'uit he spilled the blood of a pig. The vine thus nurtured with the blood of these four animals has acquired these jDroperties : the first glass of wine animates the drinker so that his vivacity is great and his colour heightened ; in this condition he resembles the peacock. When the fumes of the liquor rise to his head, he becomes as gay and full of antics as an ape. When he has become drunken he rages as the lion, and in the height of this condition he falls and grovels like the pig sprawling out in heavy slumber." In the Midrasch, r. 1, M. Absch 37, it is stated that when Noah was working on his vine plantation he was thus addressed by the Arch-Da3mon : — " I have shared in thy labours, beware that thou dost not trench on my boundary lest I do thee harm." Noah did not heed the warning, but " drank to excess, and passed the boundary ' Real Encyclopedie fiir Bibel in Talmud (Breslau, 1870), part 1, pp. 1039-10i2, DRINKING AMONG THE ANCIENTS. 11 of the domain of tlie dEemons, and lay naked in his tent." In the Midrasch BerescMt Bahba, by Dr. Anguste Wiinsche, we read that Rabbi Jochanan finding in the Hebrew letters which give the story of the vine, that those spelling the word " woe " occurred fourteen times, warned his people against the use of wine. According to Tabari, an Arabian historian,* Ham, for Origin of the having laughed at the drunkenness of his father, was cursed by Noah that his skin should become black, as well as all the fruits which were to grow in the land he should inhabit ; and thus came the purple grape, which was the white grape before Ham transplanted it. § 4. Let us also examine the mythological web which Summary of both veiled and defined the spiritual needs and religious in- and character clinations of the ancients, and essentially formulated the "^ Bacchus- character and shape of the drink question among them. We know that among the ancient Romans, Bacchus was the god of wine, and that the infamous Bacchanalia, sup- pressed by the Senate's decree (b.c. 186), were the chief expression of Bacchus- worship among them. But Bacchus- worship was not confined to Rome, neither did it originate in Rome, nor was the sensual worship the only or even the chief worship, as we shall see later on. In the first periods of historic times, Bacchus- worship was a worship of all the active forces in nature, especially those of generation. We may therefore be justified in supposing that when certain exciting properties of wine were discovei^ed by the Bacchus-worshippei's, they attached especial value to it, so that wine-worship to the sensually inclined became identical with Bacchus- worship. Aristo- phanes, in the fourth century, calls wine the milk of Venus. Bacchus had, beside his local names, innumerable other names signifying the countless various manifestations and properties in man, beast, and plant, which he was supposed to inspire, create, or enjoy. He bore different names, also, in different countries. The original Several myths designate Noah as the original Bacchus, tho^uginto be and of these the myth in India, about Satyavarman, is ^''^''■ the most striking. As the ninth chapter of Genesis relates how Noah planted a vineyard, made wine, got drunk, and * Died A.D. 922. 12 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Noah said to be Saturn, to whom is at- tributed the discovery of wine. Similarity between Greek and Egyptian Bacclius- worship. Bacchus- worship and tlie serpent. was in a sliamefiil state cliscovei-ed by his three sons Shem, Ham, and Japlieth ; so the East Indian Purana (tradition) tells of Satyavarman who, in a disgraceful condition of drunkenness, was seen by his three sons Shema, Chama, and Yapeti. But Satyavarman of India was Adonis in Phoenicia, and this divinity, again (Selden, De Diis Syr., Syntagma 11), was the same as Osiris among the Egyptians, Dionysos or Bakchos in Greece, and Bacchus or Liber in Rome. Exactly how and where Bacchus- worship originated is not known, and the order of its spread is also matter of dispute. But these points, though so interesting, being non-essential to our purpose, we may not linger on them. Morewood (op. cit.) states, according to Bockhart, that Cadmus first brought the worship of Bacchus among the Grecians, and that wine was introduced to them by the Syrians. He also thinks that Noah was the same as Saturn, and Plutarch attributes the discovery of wine to that deity. On the other hand, Alfred Maury, in his History of the Religions of Ancient Greece (Paris, 1869), maintains that Greece had its Bacchus-worship independent of the Egyptian Osiris-worship, and that it was when regular communication between the two countries was established, during the Saitic dynasty, that the Greeks first discovered the similarity between their own and the Egyptian Bacchus- worship. As the ancients had several Baccbuses, so they had also more than one parentage for the god, whose father was in all cases the same, namely Jupiter, but not so the mother. In Egypt the mother of Osiris (the Sun, and later on, the Nile, which, fructified the land) was Isis, goddess of the fruitfulness of earth, and the source of wisdom, which is granted only to those who " by persistence in lives sober, temperate, and isolated from sensual pleasures, voluptuous- ness and passions, aspire to participation in the divine nature." But the Greeks and Romans attributed their Bacchus to a dual, really a triple motherhood. Two of the three were, however, of essentially the same nature, Semele and Proserpina the ravished daughter of Ceres, whom Jupiter approached under the guise of a snake, the reptile which plays so important a part in the Bacchus rites (the serpent and the forbidden fruit !). DRINKING AMONG THE ANCIENTS. 13 A golden image of a serpent was placed in the lap of the newly initiated, the satyi^s were represented with serpents coiled around, their heads, and the serpent was consecrated to Bacchus. In these ceremonies wine was indispensable, the worshippers were drunken, and the infamous character of these orgies are the lasting obloquy of the peoples who tolerated them.* In the mythologies of India, Egypt, Greece, Rome, etc., the serpent itself was worshipped as the divinity of death, as is seen often in the designs graven on ancient tombs. The serpent was also placed at the head of the graven images of Hecate, the goddess of the kingdom of the dead (Genesis ii. 17), and in all sorcery and necromancy the serpent has been an essential factor. Another strange symbol of Bacchus is the horns. In Egypt the bull Apis was consecrated to Bacchus ; in Phrygia, Zagraeus (Bacchus) was represented Avitli hoi'ns. A horned image of him is often seen in the front of public- houses in England. Drunkenness and sensuality were, however, but one Eieusinian side of the ancient Bacchus-worship ; another phase as ™^^ ^"^*' opposite to it as light is to darkness was the so-called Eieusinian mysteries, especially the " gTeater mysteries," which were ob.served in the Attican city of Eleusis on the Eieusinian Bay. According to Strabo, the Eieusinian temple could at one period accommodate from twenty to thirty thousand people at a time. What is known with certainty about the "greater mysteries " of the Eieusinian Bacchus-worship is very limited. The works of the few writers of antiquity who ventured to treat of these mysteries — such as Melanthius, quoted by Athenseus and by the Scholiast of Aristophanes ; Hiceus, spoken of by Clemens of Alexandria ; and one or two more — have tracelessly disappeared. All we know is that the Eleusinians worshipped Bacchus as the son of Ceres (in Greece, Demeter, the same as Isis in Egypt), and that their worship chiefly consisted of contemplations and demon- strations of the unity of God and the immortality of the soul. From two extraordinary papers on the subject of the Eieusinian Mysteries, contributed by Mr. Henry M. Alden, editor of Har])ers Magazine, to the Atlantic * See Juvenal, vi. 321, and Lactantius, Just., div. 120. 14 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Monthly, during 1859-60, I quote these few passages as revealing more of the elusive and subtle spirit of the theme than any modern writing I am acquainted with, and as not being outdone in this quality by any of the native ancient authors : — " The story of the stolen Proserpina is itself an afterthought, a fable invented to explain the mysteries. The Eleusinia are older than Eleusis — older than Demeter, even the Demeter of Thrace — certainly as old as Isis, who was to Egypt what Demeter was to Greece — the Great Mother of a thousand names, who also had her repeatedly endless sorrow for the loss of Osiris. . . . The worship of this Great Mother is not more wonderful for its antiquity in time than for its prevalence as regards space. To the Hindu she was the Lady Isani. She was the Ceres of Roman mythology, the Cybele of Phrygia and Lydia, and the Disa of the north. According to Tacitus (^Germania, c. 9) she was worshipped by the ancient Suevi. She was worshipped by the Mus- covite, and representations of her are found upon the sacred drums of the Laplanders. She swayed the ancient world fi-om its south-east corner in India to Scandinavia in the north-west ; and everywhere she is the ' Mater dolorosa.' And who is it, reader, that in the Christian world struggles for life and power under the name of the Holy Virgin and through the sad features of the Madonna ? . . . And what do we read on the tablet of Isis ? — ' I am all that has been, all that is, all that is to be ; and the veil which is over my face no mortal hand has ever raised.' Not to Demeter nor even to Isis do the Eleusinia primarily point, but to the human heart, — ' I am the First and the Last— Mother of Gods and men. As deep as my mystery, so deep is my sorrow. For lo ! all generations are mine. But the fairest fruit of my holy garden was plucked by ray mortal children, since which Apollo among men and Artemis among women have raged with their fearful arrows. My fairest children, whom I have brought forth and nourished in the light, have been stolen by the children of darkness. By the flood they were taken, and I wandered forty days and forty nights upon the waters ere again I saw the face of the earth.' . . . Life in its central idea is an entire and eternal solitude. Tet each individual nature so repeats, and is itself repeated in, every other, that DRINKING AilONG THE ANCIENTS. 15 there is insured tlie possibility botli of a world revelation in the soul and of a self-incarnation in the world ; so that every man's life, like Agrippa's mirror, reflects the universe, is made the embodiment of his life — is made to beat with a human pulse. We do all, therefore, Hindu, Egyptian, Greek or Saxon, claim kinship both with earth and the heavens, with the sense of sorrow we kneel upon the earth, with the sense of hope we look into the heavens." Haggermacker, in his able work on the subject published in 1880, says that the mysteries dealt with the symbolic representation of the myth about Demeter and the im- mortality of the soul. We find also that such great men of the past as Pindar and Plato in Greece, Cicero, the slave philosopher Epictetus, and the noble and learned Emperor Marcus Aurelius in Rome, were enthusiastic admirers and zealous advocates of these mysteries. They were abolished by Emperor Theodosius the Great (379-397), in the same general decree which extinguished the sacrificial fires on all the yet remaining altars of polytheism. § 5. Historic records of the nations of antiquity are replete with proofs that the chief destroyer of individual and national greatness was drink. The early Medes and Persians gave rigorous education to their youth, who were brought up on a regimen of bread, cresses, and water, in order to accustom them early to temperance, and to strengthen their bodies. Nor were the four great Asiatic monarchies of antiquity, Assp'ia, Babylonia, Media, and Persia, conquered and destroyed by the sword until their earlier characteristics of manliness, patriotism, and morality had been sapped by di'unkenness and debaxichery. The vast Assyrian power whose' foundation reaches Assyria and beyond historic record, after incorporating Ii'an, Syria, '^"°'^" Babylonia, Egypt, Asia Minor, etc., was at last subdued by the rebel sober provinces of Media and Babylonia ; and that prince of voluptuaries, Sai'danapalus, last independent ruler of Assyria, when he saw that all was lost, betook himself to the funeral pyre, together with his women, his servants, and his treasures. We are told that his motto was — " Eat, drink, play, and know that thou art mortal ; drain present delights, there is no voluptuousness after death." 16 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Jledia and drink. Persia and drink. Familiar, but always impressive, is the account liistory gives us of the visit of the young twelve-year-old Cyrus to his grandfather. King Astyages of Media. The little fellow, destined later to overthrow Media and Babylonia, and to found the great Persian monarchy, was so astonished and disgusted at the riotous drunkenness of the Median court, he refused to touch the wine, a custom expected of him as cupbearer to his gi'andfather. He could not under- stand how the people were willing to drink till they had fallen into such a bestial state. " You seemed," he exclaimed, taming to his grand- father, and referring to a recent banquet— "you seemed to have forgotten yourself, to not know that you were the king, and when you wished to dance you could not stand ! My father drinks merely to quench his thirst." And time brought the days when this Cyrus subjugated Media and deposed his grandfather (B.C. 559). A few years after, when combined against by Babylonia and Lydia, Cyrus was defeated just outside the walls of Babylon. But IS^abunahid (Belshazzar) the victor, instead of following up his success, arranged in its celebration that infamous feast in the midst of which the ominous " Mene, mene, teJcel, TJpliarsin! " was flashed along the wall by the unknown hand, and during this fatuous debauch Cyrus, re-gathering his remaining forces, stormed the unprepared city and slew Belshazzar in his cups. Persia,* in its turn becoming weakened and emasculated by wine and the habits it generates, passed under the con- quering hand of Alexander the Great, f ^^Q same who for a time withstood the corrupting influences of Persian sybari- tism, and the intoxications of his own triumphs, but of whose death by intemperance Seneca writes : " Here is this hero, invincible by all the toils of prodigious marches, by all the * Persian history attributes the discovery of fermentation to Jemsheed, a monarch who lived very soon after the Flood. Being ex- ceedingly fond of grapes, he on one occasion thought to save some for future eating by packing them away in a jar. Of course, when he next resorted to them, he found in the stead of the luscious fruit, wine. Tradition says that Jemsheed's beautiful cup, cai-ved out of ruby, and filled with " the elixir of life, lies buried under the ruins of Istakhar." t Alexander's physician, Androcydes, warned him in these words : "Eemember, O king, . . . hemlock is poison to man, and wine is like hemlock." — Pliny, lib, xiv. chap. v. DRINKING AMONG THE ANCIENTS. 17 dangers of sieges and combats, by the most violent extremes of heat and cold, here he lies, conquered by his intem- perance, and struck to earth by the fatal cup of Hercules." It is difficult to imagine more horrible deeds than were done by some of the Persian rulers when under the influence of drink. On the plea of giving his people proof that wine had no effect on his nerves, Cambyses ordered his cup- bearer — the son of his chief officer Prexaspes — to go to the opposite side of the room, and there to stand quietly with his left arm raised over his head. Prexaspes was present, but before he could even imagine what was to happen, Cambyses had taken aim "with a bow and arrow and shot the boy through the heart. He then had the heart cut out from the youth's yet trembling body, and held it triumph- antly before the wretched father's eyes, exclaiming that he desired that this proof that wine did not harm him should be made known to his subjects ; yet it is to be observed that Cambyses (according to Herodotus) confined di'inking to himself, his army being allowed only water. This fiend married his own sister, and in a drunken debauch, during her pregnancy, kicked her to death. What views about drinking were held in ancient Persia is apparent from such facts as, for example, that preferment in office largely depended on how much a man could drink without losing his reason. Indeed, Cyi'us, who fell in a duel with his brother Artaxerxes, had urged, among other reasons why he should be chosen before his brother, that he could drink a greater quantity than Artaxerxes " with- out being inebriated, or his passions disagreeably excited." And Athenaeus (the Greek grammarian from Naukratis in Egypt) mentions that one of the Dariuses desired no gTeater encomium than that it should be engraved on his tomb that he could drink a very great quantity of wine without being- drunken.* * The Classical Journal for April, 1813, gives this specimen of old Persian poetry. The first is a ghazaP from Shefalee. " With your liver intoxicated with blood, it is delightful to reel * The ghazal is a form of Persian poetry introduced into German literature by Eiickert and Platen, and consists in repeating the rhymes of the first two lines in the fourth, sixth, and eighth lines, etc,, the intervening lines not rhyming, and the measure being a matter of option. C 18 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Egypt and drink. Temperance efforts in Egypt. As the great Asiatic monarcliies fell first by wine and then by the sword, so Egypt, the history of whose vast and highly civilized power reaches back over three thou- sand years before Christ, fell likewise into the slough of drink and licentiousness, and was conquered by the Persian province (b.C. 332). Subsequently, Alexander the Great took it ; then Greek culture gradually drove away the Egyptian, and, after the battle of Actium, it became a Roman province till conquered by the Arabs in A.D. 641. The Egyptians, whose country was famous for its corn, are regarded as the earliest brewers, and it is claimed that they knew how to extract the juice of barley nearly two thousand years before Christ ; but when they learned to ferment it, does not appear. They very early used what they called grain wine at their libations (the religious ceremony of pouring wine either upon the ground or on a sacrifice — living or dead — in honour of a deity) . Herodotus tells us that beer or wine drawn from barley was the liquor principally used, and he describes the clergy as feasting upon the sacrifices and quaSing the sacred wine. From about four to three hundred years before Christ, the Egyptians had a number of grain-wine manufactories at Pelusium on the Nile. But the ancient Egyptians knew also how to make intoxicating drinks from fermented juices, such as those of the palm, fig, and pomegranate. The condition of Egypt, before its invasion and desola- tion by the Persians, as regards temperance and morality was, as we know, most lamentable. Men and women gloried in drunkenness and shame. The few remnants of sculpture and painting that remain from the art of those days give ample proof of the condition of the people at that time. Masters are represented as carried home from their banquets in sottish unconsciousness. The dames are repre- sented struggling with nausea from their too copious bibbing, and hurrying the maids with the necessary bowl. Josephus speaks of them as the most debauched people. Yet great efforts had been made from time to time to like a flame ! intoxicated with blood it is delightful to wallow on the ground ! whilst jovial, to plunder the bower like the breeze, to cull the rose, on which the gardener has bestowed his willing care, is delightful. But in a drunken fit, never be thou so weak as to rise up the first to make peace, because to be angry afresh is delightful." DRINKING AMONG THE ANCIENTS. 19 save Egypt from this evil. Several of the Pharaohs issued stringent mandates against drunkenness, and the ominous ceremony — apparently not commanded— of placing in the centre of the banquet tables, when the wine was " beginning to tell," a skeleton crowned with a funeral wreath, dates from those days. Among the many devices to check intemperance, was a law that the friends and relatives of the dead should abstain from all wine and luxuries for a certain time (from, forty to seventy days subsequent to the death) according to the rank and station of the departed ; the higher the rank or importance the longer was the abstention to be observed, which is significant of the great respect really felt for temperance. " If," as Morewood so eloquently says of ancient Egypt {op. cit.), "a secret glow of veneration arises for a nation so long distinguished in the annals of antiquity for all that was majestic and mighty, whether we consider its almost superhuman structures, its profound erudition, its wonder- ful inventions, or the splendour, pomp, and glory which surrounded its early inhabitants," how different the feeling which presses on the heart of him who, standing to-day in the shadow of the Sphinx, sees only the lonely Nile and the far-stretching torrid sands, both alike as dumb and vestige- less to him of those nobler realities as are its strong lips and fixed unsleeping eyes ! But, in speaking of antiquity, we generally mean not the Assyrians, Babylonians, Medes, Persians, or even the Egyptians, but the Greeks and Romans. The other great nations, with the exception of the Jews, have left but small traces in literature, science, and art, in comparison wdth those of Greece and Rome, who for so many centuries, mutually and antagonistically, but absolutely, ruled the whole civilized world for the time, politically, intellectu- ally, and morally. ISTotwithstanding which, they exist no more. Who can point to a living, genuine remnant of either of these nations ? What destroyed them ? Is there danger that through the same causes, great civilized powers of our time may in their turn coUapse and disappear ? 20 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Greece and drink. Athens. Sparta. Home and drink. In speaking of Greece, thought always reverts to the two contrasting rivals, those republics of Athens and Sparta, so long dominating all the others. In Athens the severe laws of Draco condemned to death any person convicted of being drunk. The wise laws of Solon (Diog. Laert. in Solon i.) condemned an archont (the highest public functionary in Athens after the abolition of royalty, B.C. 1068) to a heavy fine for the first time he was intoxicated, and in case of relapse — to death. A citizen seen to enter a drinking shop was dishonoured for ever, and no more was required to cause the banishment of a senator from the Ai'eopagus (high court of Athens). In martial, brave, but cruel and perfidious Sparta — where domestic affections were crushed out by law, and the common decencies and moralities held in contempt in accordance with the Lycurgan institutions, which among other things enjoined common public baths for both sexes, and placed no restraint on the sexual appetites — they did fear the results of drinking. In fact, it is claimed that Lycurgus himself gave the command that annually the helotes (slaves) of Sparta should be intoxicated, and of the orgies ensuing among them the youth should be made spectators, to infuse in them aversion to drink. But not only in Athens and Sparta was this rigour shown ; Pittacus of Mitylene (island of Lesbos) punished crimes committed in drunkenness with double penalties. But in Greece, as in the great monarchies of the East, drunkenness prevailed against the efforts at restraining it. Wine culture, after passing from Persia and Syria to Greece and the Archipelago, was brought later on to Italy and Southern France. In the first days of Rome wine was almost unknown. Even as late as the second Samnite war (327-304) the Dictator Papirius vowed a small cup of wine to Jupiter as the most costly gift, if he should be victorious ; which he was (309) . That is, almost a hundred and fifty years after the foundation of Rome, wine was rarer than gems. And for centuries after the Samnite wars, though •wine was imported in increasing quantities, drinking habits did not become general, until the time of Julius Ccesar, Avhen it began to be cultivated in Italy. During DRINKING AMONG THE ANCIENTS. 21 tlie reiofns of Auo-ustns and his immediate successors, ■Mvine culture and wine making became a passion among the Romans. During the empire it abounded, and history shows beyond question that enervation, loose morals, cor- ruption, and crime increased among the Romans in almost an exact ratio to the increase of their habits of drinking. Even the Stoics — those severe philosophers who held that human conduct must be restrained within the exact interpretation of the four cardinal virtues, Prudence, Justice, Temperance, and Fortitude — even they sometimes intoxicated themselves for the " refreshment of their souls." The women were as abandoned to drink and loose-living, and prided themselves on being able to stand as much wine as the men. And most conspicuous in these debaucheries were the C^sars, and the emperors Caligula, Nero, Vitel- lins, Domitian, etc. And yet in this very Rome, steeped in drunkenness, licentiousness, and crime, the Vestal Fire was kept inviolate and sacred, and we find, in Tacitus (A7inals,xv. 36), that even the monster Nero, having dared to violate the temple of Vesta (by entering therein), was "seized with a sudden agitation and tremor in his body, as if the goddess had struck him with teri'or in the consciousness of his ill-deeds ; " and the same multitudes who could abandon themselves to all excesses of the Bacchanalia approved the condemnation to living burial of a vestal on mere suspicion of impurity, and could callously look on at the whipping to death (according to law, Livy, xxii. 57) of a vestal's paramour — so little was it understood that national safety depends on character, not on the inviolability of shrines. Have these lessons of the past borne fruit in the present ? But Rome had not always been such a cauldron of Temperance seething vices. According to Dionysius of Halicamassus, ^^^^ ^^ Romulus promulgated a law which permitted the husband to kill hismfe for drinking wine, as for committing adultery. The death penalty for adultery, as we know, was frequently inflicted in the early days of Rome, and Pliny (book xiv. chap. 13) relates that a certain Ignatius Mecennius, having killed his wife for having drunk wine, was acquitted by Romulus ; and Fabius Pictor, in his Annals, states that a Roman lady was starved to death by her own relations, because she had picked the lock of a chest in w^hich were the keys of a wine-cellar ; and Pliny also assures us that 22 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Seneca's de- scription of the results of intemper- ance in an- cient Rome. Cneius Domitius, a Roman judge, in a like case sentenced the defendant in these lines : " That it seemed she had drunk more wine, without her husband's knowledge, than was needful for the preservation of her health, and that therefore she should lose the benefit of her dowry." The custom of greeting women by kissing on the mouth is said to date from this time, (!) and to have been adopted in order to discover if they had tasted wine. That the famous vine-planting edict, which forbade throughout the empire the further culture of the vine, and commanded the destruction of one-half the vines then flourishing in its vast dependencies, was issued by Rome's worst debauchee, the Emperor Domitian, signifies how profound was the dread of the effects of drinking upon the nation's life and prosperity, even as felt by one of its most supine votaries. This edict remained in force for a hundred and eighty years, and then the Emperor Probus abolished it as far as France, Spain, and South- Western Hungary were concerned. The terrible consequences of wine drinking in ancient Rome are memorably described by Nero's famous teacher, the noble Stoic philosopher Seneca, in his 95th Epistle, § 16 : — " These excesses result in pallor, quivering of the nerves in the wine-soaked body, and a leanness from indigestion, more pitiful than the emaciation of hunger ; uncertain and unsteady gait, distension of the bowels, which are forced to continually take in more than they are constructed to hold or make use of, yellow and blotched complexion, deterioration and rottenness of the fluids of the system, cramping of the hands from hardening of the ligaments, dullness and torpor of the nerves, alternating with tremor. And the indescribable faintness of these victims, the torments they suffer by reason of disordered sight and hearing, creeping headaches, etc., etc., what language can convey ? " Syracuse. Cartilage. As with Babylon, so with Syracuse — during a drunken debauch in celebration of victory, it was reconquered by the vanquished. Sober Carthage, sinking under drunken and licentious habits, fell a prey to her rival Rome, yet Rome did not learn the lesson. DRINKING AMONG THE ANCIENTS. 23 Julius Caesar, in his Commentaries, wrote of the Sneves The Sueves. — that martial people who filled the heart of Germany, from the Danube to the Baltic — that they prevented even the importation of wine, so convinced were they of its destructiveness to strength and virtue. But these also fell to drink and then to the sword. " The writings of Hector Boetius," says Dr. Ralph Drink Barnes Grindrod (Bacchus, 1839), " show the severity of aSt*''" the Scottish laws and the utter detestation in which in Scots, ancient times that nation held drunkenness. The laws of the ancient Scots in relation to those who kept houses for the sale of drink were peremptory and severe. ... It is said that Argadus, Administrator of Scotland (a.d. 160), con- fiscated their goods, pulled down the houses, and banished the men ; and under King Constantine the Second (a.d. 861), if they did not submit to the law they were to be hung. One of this king's laws commanded young persons of either sex to abstain entirely from the use of inebriating liquors. Death was the punishment on conviction of drunkenness. The same law and same penalty extended to all persons who held a magisterial or other public post." As to the Jews, all readers of the Old Testament know The Jews, that — in spite of the patriotism, the marvellous coherence and vitality which makes the race unique among the nations — the kingdoms of Israel and Judah were strangled by the vine ; and as to the Mohammedans, usually and justly The Jfoham- regarded as the most abstemious of peoples, private ™®^*'^- drunkenness is teri-ibly prevalent among them nowadays, though perhaps less so in Turkey than in Tunis and other Mohammedan countries.* * It is well known that tlie prophet Mohammed rigorously con- demned drunkenness, and it is related of him that in the fourth year of the Hegira, while his forces were contending with neighbouring tribes, some of his principal men, betaking themselves to play and drink, quarrelled in the heat of their cups, and raised such broils among his followers as to threaten the overthrow of all his designs, to prevent which mischiefs in the future, he forbade the use of wine, and also all games of hazard, for ever. Both to strengthen and illustrate this commandment, he told the allegory of the two angels, Arut and Marut (Prideaux's Life of Mahomet), who were sent from Mohammed's heaven to administer justice in Babylon in her ancient days : to wit, drink that once a -woman, whose affairs had been arranged for her by these allegory, angelic judges, invited them to dinner. She placed wine before her guests, and though God had enjoined them not to touch wine, they 24 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Thus tte history of the past offers a vast array of concurrent testimony that as long as drink was un- known to a nation, it remained comparatively strong and prosperous ; and that in the measui^e that nations have succumbed to drink, they have lost their independence, and passed in the most terrible harlotry from master to master, until given over by the gangrene of decay to oblivion. drank, and then tempted the woman. She pretended to yield to their wishes, biit made the conditions that first one of the angels should carry her to heaven, and the other should bring her back again. On coming into the presence of the Almighty, she told Him how she had been tempted, and had saved herself by seeking shelter with Him. In reward for her chastity, the Almighty changed her into the morning-star, and the angels were given their choice of being punished for their sin at that time or in the futm-e. They chose immediate punishment, and were suspended by the feet with an iron chain in a pit near Babylon, where they are doomed to remain until the day of judgment. For which reasons God forbade His servants ever to use wine. And in the Koran we read, " Wine and gambling are abominable inventions of Satan. Beware of forgetting God, because the demon would employ wine and gambling to fire in us the flame of impurity, and turn us away from adoration and prayer." Some of the sultans and caliphs took extraordinary measures to prevent drunkenness. Soliman I. ordered that melted lead should be poured down the throats of drinkers. ( 25 ) CHAPTER II. HISTOET OF THE DISCOVERY OF DISTILLATION. § 6. Although medifeval history gives us many both in- teresting and instructive facts as to the eifects of drink and the efforts made to combat the evil during the dark and early Middle Ages, its record in the main is so similar to that of antiquity — with the exception that condemnation of the habit became more general, yet weaker, and indul- gence more univei'sal and excessive — that I need not here dwell upon it,* but proceed at once to the history of the discovery of distillation. Owing to two acts of shameful barbarity, we are left in Reasons for nearly the same uncertainty regarding the discovery of regafdingthe distillation, as by chance, we are in regard to the discovery discovery of of the physical fact of fermentation. All the ancient Egyptian works on alchemy, some of which in all probability would have solved the question still baflHing us, as to when, where, how, and by whom the art of spirit distillation was first discovered, were ruthlessly destroyed by the Roman Barbarities of Emperor Diocletian in his superstitious fear lest the aM^^^^y Egyptians should, by converting all available metals into gold, secure the means to regain their independence. And three hundred years later, when Egypt was taken from the Romans by Caliph Omar's chief commander Amru, that barbarian destroyed the famous Ptolemeian Library at Alexandria, reputed to have numbered 700,000 volumes, explaining his irreparable villainy on the silly pretext that * Those who wish to pursue inquiry in this direction will find abundant information in Morewood's Inebriating Liquors (1838) ; Rev. Father Bridget's Discipline of Brink (1876) ; Mr. Samuelson's History of Brink (1878) ; and in the works to which these authors refer. 26 THE FOUXDATIOX OF DEATH. if the contents of ttese books agreed with the Koran they were nseless, if against it they were pernicious, and, therefore, in either case, their destruction was proper. Reasons why That such a secrct as the art of distillation should be was kept^^'^ Confined to recondite works, and not spread, but indeed be secret. guarded from general knowledge, is not very surprising when the position of the discoverer (or participant in the discovery) is considei-ed. He might at first have imagined that he had at last discovered that life elixir which in the dark ages seems to have been the one ray of hope to man ; and though experiment must soon have disproved this theory, he was still, unless sheltered by exceptionally high and favoured station, in danger of his life from the machinations of public and private avarice ; and, again, subject to total loss of the special advantages of his know- ledge, should it be generally disseminated. Distillation, generally speaking, may be said to have preceded the discovery of fermented drinks, because who- ever first condensed (and any one might have done so) some of the steam rising from boiling water, would be the first distiller, and in a like sense he who should be the first to (for any reason) boil fermented liquor, and condense some of its vapours on a cool surface, would, whether he knew it or not, be the first spirit distiller. But so long as such facts were accidents — that is, not results of man's understanding or intention, but occuning without attracting observation to the processes — they were practically not discoveries. disUulHon.*'^ I>istiUation* is "the volatilization of a liquid in a closed vessel by heat, and its subsequent condensation in a separate vessel by cold." f But the ancients applied the term to most operations of transformation, purification, and analysis. Some solids as well as liquids may be dis- tilled (but not all of them) ; for example, iodine, arsenic, chlorides of mercury, etc. Spirit. Spirit is a term which, though specially applied to alcohol, is applicable to any liquid produced by distillation. •Spint distil- Spirit distillation is the operation of extractino- spii'it latlOU. p ^ ^ ■ IT. from a substance by evaporation and condensation. * Latin, de and stillare ; Italian, distillare ; French, distiller ; Spanish, destilar — to flow or fall in drops, t Webster's Dictionary. HISTORY OF THE DISCOVERY OF DISTILLATION. 27 Spirit distillation merely sifts out the alcoliol. Alcohol boils at 173° Fahr., while water reaches boiling' point first at a temperature of 212° Fahr. Consequently cider or gTape or any juice containing saccharine matter, when subjected to heat, boils the alcohol first, which, in the shape of steam, can be passed into and deposited in a separate vessel. The point in this process is to secure the boiling point of the alcohol without reaching the heat at which the water will boil. Hectification is the re-distillation of what has already Rectification. been distilled. Its object is to separate more completely the water which may have been vaporized with the alcohol. S 7. The original discovery of spirit distillation* is very Discovery of . . ... suirit distil- naturally sought for in those countries of antiquity dis- lation attri- tinguished for the greatest civilization and culture, and p^f^^gt"*^ Avriters on the subject are tolerably unanimous in pointing to the Far Eastf and, most of them, to China. J " Humboldt cw°»- says that the process used by us in making sugar was brought from Oriental Asia, and that even the cylinders placed horizontally and put in motion by a mill with cauldrons and purifying apparatus, such as are to be seen. * "There runs an old German legend, prevalent to this day in the duchy of Saxe-Meiningen, which details circumstantially his Satanic Majesty's claim to this important invention. The monarch of the infernal regions, so the story goes, was once fairly outwitted by a Steinbach man, who ti-icked the great enemy of mankind into entering an old beech-tree, where he found himself trapped vrithoub power of escape, and did not regain his freedom till the tree was cut down. As soon as he was liberated, Old Nick rushed frantically to his dominions to see how things had fared during his absence. To his dismay he found hell emiJty. Casting about him for some means of refilling Pandemonium with lost souls, he hit upon the idea of inventing brandy. Delighted with this happy thought, he hurried' at once to the city of Nordhausen, and set up a distillery there, which was so successful that all the rich men of the place came to him to learn this new art of brandy-making, and in due time, abandoning theii" other business, became distillers themselves. ' And thus,' says the old chronicler of the legend, ' it happened that to the jDresent day there is no other place in the world where there is so much of brandy burned as at Nordhausen.' " — Licensed Victuallers' Guide, July, 1880. t The Asiatic Journal of ISiO cites an old Hinda manuscript, according to which a distilled liquor resembling brandy, called Kea-sum, was known in India from most ancient times. X Samuel Morewood. 28 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. in the West Indies, are purely of Chinese origin, and were in use at a period long anterior to the visit of any European to that country. ... In China, a country which has preserved its civil polity for so many thousand years, the art of distillation was known far beyond the date of any fofbeS? of its authentic records. . . . That the Chinese were the Chinese vcrscd in all the secrets of alchemy, or, rather, in that the original hrancli of it which had for its object a universal panacea, d-snIT^"^''°^ long before this fancy engaged the speculations of European while seek- practitioners, there is abundant proof, since some of their iito'*^^ *^'**'' empirics have from an early period boasted of a specific among their drugs which insures an immortality like that conferred on Godwin's ' St. Leon.' The search after this elixir vitce originated, it appears, among the disciples of the philosopher Lao-kiun, who flourished six hundred years before Christ. Not content with tlie tranquillity of mind which that teacher of wisdom endeavoured to in- culcate, and considering death as too great a barrier to its attainment, they betook themselves to chemistry, and after the labour of ages in a vain endeavour to prevent the dissolution of our species, and after the destruction of three of their emperors, who fell victims to the immortalizing draught, they, like the alchemists of Europe, ended their researches under the pretence of discoveries which were never made. " The Emperor Vu-Ti, who reigned in the year 177 B.C., when about to put one of his ministers to death for drink- ing a cup of this liquor which had been prepared for him- self, was convinced of his weakness aiid folly by the following wise and sensible remonstrance of his minister : — " ' If this drink, sire, hath made me immortal, how can you put me to death ? But if you can, how does such a frivolous theft deserve it ? '" * Dr. Baer, of Berlin, in his AlcoJiolismus (1878), says that " SantscJiu, a spirit distilled from various grains in China, but especially from rice, has been a common drink in China and Japan for several hundred years." That the Arabs knew anything of distillation previous to their intercourse with the Chinese empire (in A.D. 715) is contested. * Da Halde, Annals of the MonarcUs, vol. i. p. 177. HISTORY OF THE DISCOVERY OF DISTILLATION, 29 Dr. Magnus Huss, in his excellent work Alcoholismus (Stockholm, 1849-1851), says that " the art of distillation was first discovered in Ai^abia, but as regards arrack at least, the Chinese and Indians seem to have been their teachers." But there is ample reason for supjiosing that spirit dis- Distillation tillation was practically known in Arabia long before the '" ^^ "*" time generally accepted as the earliest. There seems little doubt that Geber (Abou-Moussah Diafar-el-Soli) knew Geber. the process of distillation. According to Leo Afi'icanus,* Geber lived in the seventh century, according to others in the eighth. He was called Pricce because of his great learning. Several of his works in Arabic, and one English translation, are to be found in the British__Museum. In his Liber Investigationis Magisterii, Geber himself describes distillation and re-distillation, and proves that be under- stood the processes and the value of the retort (vessel in which substances are subjected to distillation or decom- position by heat). " Distillation is the raising of aqueous vapour in any vessel in which it is placed. There are various modes of distillation. Sometimes it is performed by means of fire, sometimes without it. By means of fire the vapour either ascends into a vessel or descends, as when oil is extracted from vegetables. . . . When we distil oil by means of water we obtain fair and clean oil. . . . By means of water, then, we must proceed with every vegetable, and things of the same nature, to ascertain their elementary parts. ... If not pure at first, put it back until it becomes sufficiently pure. . . . N.B. — At first it will send over only the water with which it was moistened, then the liquor to be distilled." f Whether Geber knew about alcoholic distillation is not distinctly stated. That, however, he or some disciple of his probably did so, we are led by a variety of circumstances to infer, and Morewood {op. cit.) quotes the saying that " Al-Mokanna, the veiled, prophet, whose life and actions Ai-Mokan- are" so "^autifully detaiTeoEy Moore in his Lalla Boohh, °^'® 'i<^^*'»- when likely to be taken by the troops under the command of Almohdis' general, in the year Hegira 163, or 980 of * Hist. Crit. PMlosophicB, 1, vol. iii. p. 136. + Cited from Geber by Samuel Morewood, in his History of Inebriating Liquors, Dublin, 1838. 30 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Rhazes, the Moorish physician. Albucassis, a Moorish physician. Raimundus Lullus. Arnoldus Villa-Novus. our era, to avoid falling into tlie hands of his enemies, after poisoning his whole family and followers, threw him- self into a vessel of aquafortis." § 8. As regards Europe, it appears certain that Rhazes (Mohammed Aboubekr ibn Zakaria el Rhazi, 850-923), the celebrated Moorish physician, called the phoenix of his age on account of his vast learning, jiractised spirit dis- tillation. Dr. J. Friend, in his History of Physic (London, 1726, vol. i.), says, " As to distillation, M. Le Clerc fixes the epoch of it in the time of Avicenna " (a Moorish physician who died about 1036), "who, as he supposes, first applied this sort of knowledge in the way of medicine ; . , . if it be, as perhaps it may be . . . derived from the Arabians, the honour of the invention ought rather to be restored to Rhazes." Hoefer, in his great work. History of Chemistry, says positively that Rhazes knew how to distil spirit from grain, but for some reason his discovery did not become a matter of general knowledge. Two hundred years later another distinguished Moorish physician and chemist, Albucassis, or Aboul Casim (Chalaf Ben Abbas el-Zahravi, died a.d. 1106), is claimed to have discovered the art of distillation, and in his case at least there are positive proofs. The Arab historian, Wiistenfeld, in his History of Arabian Physicians and Naturalists (1840), demonstrates with documents that Albucassis knew how to make brandy, which disposes of the erroneous but familiar assertion — resting on the unsupported statement of Andersen in his History of Commerce — that distillation was discovered so late in the twelfth century as 1150. And yet it was first in the days of Raimundus Lullus (1234-1315) and Arnoldus Villa-Novus (1238-1314) that the knowledge of distillation began to be spread. Raimundus Lullus, born on the Spanish island Majorca, was first a theologian of eminent merits, but falling in love with a charming girl who was afflicted with cancer, he gallantly attacked physic and chemistry in the hope of learning how she might be cured, and his studies in chemistry were so thorough that he became one of the most famous of alchemists. He improved upon the crude mode of spirit distillation by using salts for the elimination of water.* * Ars magna Lulli, or " LuUus's great art," was an ingenious HISTORY OF THE DISCOVERY OF DISTILLATION. 31 Of Arnoldus Villa-N"ovus, Professor of Medicine at Montpelier, France, Dr. Thomson (System of Chemistry, vol. ii. 1817) says, " He was the first to form tinctures and introduce tliem into medicine ; " and citing from Crell's Annals (1796), Dr. Thomson adds, "He is said also to have been the first who obtained the oil of turpentine." He is chiefly known for the zeal with which, he advocated the use of alcohol, being as identified with its spread as Friar Hernandez with that of tobacco, and as Peter the Hermit with the recovery of the Holy Gi'ave. § 9. When we consider that the alchemists — whose Reasons for philosophy, founded by Hermes Trismegistus, was based on mfsts'^beiief Aristotle's doctrine of four elementary substances of the in aicoboi. universe, air, water, fire, and earth — had been constantly labouring for hundreds of years, by means of various com- binations, to extract from these elements the universal essence of life, is it wonderful that on obtaining this mysterious spirituous fluid, comprising ingredients of all these elements, yet baffling their efforts at analysis, they should at once cry out that at last was found the philo- sopher's stone, the fifth element, the quintessence, the elixir of life ? " The Adepts (those credited with having found the Reasons for philosopher's stone, and therefore pei-fect in alchemic art), of th'e^''"^''^ judging from the burning sensation it produced, and the masses. fact that it is obtained only by the well-managed and careful application of heat, believed that spirit contained the principles of fire.* Is it wonderful that when they found out their terrible mistake, they were exceedingly loth to acknowledge it, the belief of the masses being the only plank for their otherwise absolutely lost reputation ? Is it strange that the masses of the nations who had been for centuries kept in feverish expectancy of the great attempt at systematic arrangement of tlie ideas necessary in general knowledge and ordinary commnnication, letters to be used as signi- fying the fundamental ideas, and mathematical figures to indicate their relations. Going at last as a missionary to Maui-itania (north- west coast of Africa), he was stoned to death at the age of eighty, by the natives. * The North American Indians seem by natural instinct to have reached a similar conclusion in their simple effective appellation — fire-vifater. 32 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Various names for alcohol. Derivations of the word alcohol. discovery, should, on hearing the " lo triomphe ! " of their wisest leaders, make the eager chorus of that cry and clamour for the poisoning draught which they believed to be the " Water of life " ? § 10. When first discovered, the distilled spirit was known by a variety of names, such as aqua ardens, aqua- fortis, vinum ardens, vinum adustimn (burnt) , spiritus ardens, etc. Arnoldus Villa- Novus called it aqua-vitce or aqua-vini. Raimundus Lullus often called it aqua ardens and aqua vitce ardens. It was also called mercurius vegetabilis, because bodily substances capable of being evaporated through circulating heat were termed mercurial, as it is by means of intense heat that mercury in the form of fumes is expelled fi'om metallic minerals. " This name, however," says H. Kopp, in his Jlistory of Chemistry (Braunschweig, 1847), "came into disuse in the sixteenth century, and from that time forth the term alcohol became steadily more general." In the word alcohol the Arabic article al is prefixed, as in the word aZ-chemy, to denote the superlative degree of the cohol, or in Arabic, koM ; in Chaldaic, cohal ; in Hebrew, Tcaal ; which means fine, that is, exceedingly fine and subtle. This word was used in Arabia as the name of an almost ethereally fine powder with which the Eastern dames were wont to tinge their eyebrows and eyelashes ; hence because this fluid was found in Arabia, and was among fluids as fine and volatile as this cosmetic among powders, Europeans gave to it the sarue name.* According to Dr. Edward Johnson, it is founded upon the Eastern superstition of the earth being infested with wicked spirits, and that when the first effect of this newly discovered drug was seen upon men, the Arabians imagined the persons to be possessed of a devil, which had either assumed the form of the liquid, or entered the body along with it, in which case they would in fright exclaim, " Al ghole, Al ghole," the evil ghost or spirit. f And even when ■ this notion was put aside, the vast amount of mischief * Rev. Dr. J. Guthrie, in his Temperance Physiology (Glasgow, 1877), thinks the word alcohol is " probably derived from the Ai'abic kahaia, equivalent to the Hebrew cachal, to paint." t " O thou invisible spirit of wine, if thou hast no name to be known by, let us call thee Devil ! " — Cassio in Othello, Act ii. so. 3. HISTORY OF THE DISCOVERY OF DISTILLATION. 33 which the liquid still wrought amongst mankind caused the i-etention of the name " Al ghole," which in course of time has been corrupted to alcohol. " Kopp thinks," says Dr. Baer (oj). cit.), " that the word came from the Arabic technique, and meant poivder and to pulverize, and that the spirit di'awn over the carbonate of potassium to free it from water, was first called spirihis alcalisatus (alkali meaning salt), and thereafter by trans- position spiritus a\co\isatits, which term went into alcool spiritics vini. So, for example, does Libavius * put together vini alcool and vinum alcalisatum. Says Dr. Huss (op. cit.), "When we remember that just at that period the medical science was at its lowest ebb, the masses placing their trust especially in arcana and universal remedies, we find it quite natural that a remedy so generally praised and so agreeable to the taste should become a household article, and from a medical The spread become a dietetic necessity,— ^at first on the pretext of its antidotal and strength-giving properties, but soon also on account of its intoxicating nature, — in cot as well as castle. And with such rapidity and avidity did this abuse spread, that by the middle of the seventeenth century, it was common among all classes, and chemistry was required to find new avenues of production in order to satisfy the cravings for drink. And this was found in the distillation of all kinds of gi'ain and fruit, and lastly potatoes." * Libavius, who died in 1616, wrote the first chemical text-book, called Alchemia. THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. CHAPTER III. PRELIMINARIES TO THE STUDY OF MODERN DRINKING. § 11. Thus far we have taken a brief survey of the drinking customs among tlie ancients, of the effects of the habits and the notions then prevalent ; and have touched on the discovery of distillation, and the spread of the use of alcohol as a life-elixir, as medicine, and as a beverage. But before dealing with the effects of alcohol on man, since distilled as well as fermented drinks became common in Europe, it will be necessary to say something about chemistry and physiology in order to be intelligible to the great masses who have so little time to keep abreast with the progress of scientific knowledge, but who use their narrow opportunities with an eagerness and energy de- serving far more respect and attention than they receive. That power of ancient thought over modern investiga- tion, of which we have spoken, is practically illustrated by the history of chemistry.* The Greek philosopher Aristotle's Terminology, for example— a work arranging and defining technical terms — is not yet displaced by any other, and his general theories still undei^lie modern realism. A writer on almost every subject, Aristotle wrote also some works on plants and animals, and thus really originated the sciences of botany and physiology ; and though these works are now regarded as among his weakest efforts, and notwithstanding the patent eiTors in them, they were, * Chemistry, that branch of science which treats of the composition, decomposition, and changes of substances ; chemist, a person versed in chemistry ; chemically, according to the natural laws of chemistry ; chemicals, substances jDroducing chemical eifects ; molezule, an in- divisible comjiouud of matter j atom, indivisible ultimate of matter. PRELIMINAEIES TO THE STUDY OF MODERN DRINKING. owing to the weiglit of his great name, paramount over all other authorities for two thousand years, other investiga- tions beingr fenced within the lines he had drawn. It was first by the demonstration of the famous Irish The dis- philosopher and chemist, R. Boyle (1627-1691), of the chemical existence of chemical elements, that Aristotle's " four ^jj™®^"J,^' elements" theory was finally and definitely disproved, and oxygen. Two of the chief elements in all life-combinations, nitrogen and oxygen, were not discovered, however, till 1772 and 1774 respectively, the first by Rutherford and the second by Priestley and Scheele. But Lavoisier was the first to use these discoveries in laying the foundation of a philo- sophical science. From Boyle's time and until the time of Antoine Lavoisier's Laurent Lavoisier (1743-1794) it was supposed that the SusiTo"/ more complex compounds in the animal and vegetable oxidation, worlds were peculiar, that is, foreign to the mineral or inorganic, and were termed organic compounds because they are highly complex substances which constitute organic bodies, to distinguish them from the substances composing the mineral creation, which were termed in- organic compounds. Lavoisier dispelled this notion, and showed that just as oxygen, by combustion of carbon, forms carbonic acid, and, in combination with hydrogen, water in external nature ; so the oxygen in the inhaled air pro- duces corresponding changes in the carbon and hydrogen it finds in the animal organism. While engaged in experi- ments which he hoped might change the faint ray into the broad light of day, Lavoisier was seized and brought before Danton, who, when Lavoisier begged for only fourteen days more in which to complete his experiments that the results might be saved to mankind, brutally exclaimed that France wanted neither scholars nor chemists, and hurried him to the guillotine.* * " The man is thouglit a knave or fool Or bigot plotting crime, Who, for the advancement of his kind, Is wiser than his time. For him the hemlock shall distill; For him the axe be bared ; For him the gibbet shall be built ; For him the stake prepared. 36 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. The founda- tion of scien- tific physi- ology laid in 1850, in the cell dis- covery. The estab- lishment of organic scientific physiology in 1855. Lavoisier had lived, however, to found the chemico- phjsiological science, indicating the intimacy and inter- dependence existing between all parts of the physical universe, and in this pointing out to us the vast scope of scientific physiology. But immediately upon his death his theories were scouted as the dreams of a visionary, and even so late as 1835 the famous German physiologist Joannes Miiller, in his Handbook of Physiology, ridiculed them, saying that the theory of water formation from hydrogen was invented to support that of combustion, but afterwards founded his brilliant chemico-physiological school on the basis laid by Lavpisier.* It was first by the establishment tlirough Schwann — one of Miiller's most competent disciples — and Von Mohl, of the theory of the cell, termed by Professor Huxley the "basis of life" (1850-51), that a stable foundation for scientific physiology was laid ; and the probable truth of this cell basis of life has been demonstrated by the vast structure already reared on that slender beginning. Thus physiology, from being regarded merely as the science of the organs and their functions in animals and plants, has become what the name indicates (physiology — Greek, physis, nature, and logos, discourse) the science of nature, though its investigations of the inorganic world, the plants, and even of the animals, are daily becoming more experimental in oi'der to obtain clues for solving some of the manifold mysteries of the human organism. From about 1855 dates the scientific researches in organic f physiology, and chemico-physiological science is therefore not quite thirty years old. In that time it has Him shall the scorn and wrath of men Pursue with deadly aim ; And malice, envy, spite, and lies Shall desecrate his name. But truth shall conquer at the last ; For round and round we run, And ever the right comes uppermost And ever is justice done." Charles Mackay. * With Morveau, Lavoisier formed the modem chemical nomenclature. t The term organic is now applied simply to the compounds of carbon, irrespective of their complexity (Baker's Physiology). PRELIMINARIES TO THE STUDY OF MODERN DRINKING. 37 made tremendous progress, but has not yet solved all the mysteries of physical life, nor can it be faii'ly expected that it should have done so within such a space, though many seem to have expected it. § 12. Alcohol has played a most prominent part in How alcohol chemical researches from the first, and for several reasons, pro^nent In the experiments made with alcohol, when the demand subject for became greater than could be supplied by the original vestigation. methods, it was soon found that alcohol possessed the most marked and highly valuable properties for chemical experiments, the power of solving — with some notable exceptions, as we shall find later on — most chemical sub- stances, and of mixing in almost any proportions with most fluids. Then the demand made by both drinkers and abstainers, and more and more imperatively made, for information as to the exact efi^ects of drink on the human system, has further stimulated the scientific study of alcohol, so that researches in this direction have been disproportion- ately greater than those referring to other chemical compounds. Until 1828 it was supposed that there was only one Discovery of kind of alcohol (viz. ethyl- alcohol — the name being derived ^gtilyi, from the first syllable in the Greek word aither, ether, and and amyi another Greek word, hyla, wood, hence wood-ether — which is the name for the spirit of wine), but in that year Dumas and Peligot proved that the distilled spirit of wood — known in trade as methylated (or methyl-alcohol, from Greek, vieta, with, and hyla, wood, hence wood-spirit) spirit, discovered by Taylor- — was an alcohol. In 1839 the spirit extracted from the starch of potato was found to contain amyl very largely, and was called amyZ-alcohol, from the Greek word amylon, meaning fine meal or starch. Alcohols The great have since been discovered by the hundred, necessitating gr™pg and elaborate systematizations of the various series in groups varieties of and divisions. Of all these series and groups of alcohols we are chiefly, if not exclusively, concerned with the first or fatty series — so called because they were looked upon as pro- ductive of fat. Of these, only two, ethyl and amyl, require extensive treatment, though five of these groups are generally found together in all alcohols, viz. : — 38 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. The elements of alcohol. Oxygen. Hydrogen. Carbon. Methyl, or, according to Gerhardt, in Greek numerals, prolyl or Is^. Ethyl, „ „ „ deutyl or 2nd. Propyl, „ „ „ trityl or 3rd. Butyl, „ „ „ tetryl or 4th. Amyl, „ „ „ pentyl or 5th. To show the reader how complex even this series is, I may mention that each of these five groups contains several kinds, and the number is constantly increasing. As an example, Basset, the French chemist, in his great work on Distillation, published sixteen years ago, mentions : — • 79 kinds of methyl. 17 „ butyl. 15 „ propyl. 9 „ amyl. 7 „ ethyl. All alcohols * are composed of three elements, viz. oxygen, hydrogen, and carbon. Oxygen (Greek, oxys, sharp, and genein, to generate, so called because originally supposed to form an essential part of acids) is a gaseous element, without positive taste, colour, or smell, but possessing strong chemical attraction, and forming about one-sixth part of common air. Its slow combination with other elements results in oxidation, and its sudden combination in combustion. Hydrogen (Greek, hydoor, water, and genein, to gene- rate), the lightest of all known gaseous elements, is found in small but variable proportion in the air. Its increase produces rain, and it forms about one-ninth part of water. It is colourless, highly inflammable, and forms an essential part of almost all organic bodies. Carbon is a non-gaseous, non-metallic element. It forms the chief element in charcoal, enters largely into mineral coals, and in its pure crystallized state forms the diamond. It is combustible, and predominates in all organic compounds. In its chemical properties it differs from other elements in this respect, that it is capable of * " Alcohol is the collective name of a class of organic unions whicli in their characteristics and modes of formation stand close to the ordinary ethyl-alcohol. They are all neutral, but unite, when freed from the watery elements, with acids, making compound ethers, from which they can again be restored by the addition of the elements of water." — Brockhaus' Conversation-Lexicon, vol. i. (1884) Ed. 13, now in process of publication. PRELIMINARIES TO THE STUDY OF MODERN DRINKING. 39 uniting with hydrogen in various definite proportions, thus forming the vast variety of hydro-carbons, and when also combined wuth oxygen giving rise to the carbo-hydrates which are found throughout the vast plant world. The chief substance among the carbo-hydrates, from The natural which alcohol is derived, is sugar — a most varied and aSois"^ vastly extended siibstance not confined to the plant world, but spreading throughout the whole dominion of life. Scientists group sugars according to their different views. The simplest arrangement, I find, is one of three groups : — First gTOup. — Glucose (Greek, glykos, sweet), which comprises principally grape sugar, fruit sugar, and inosit — a sweet found in many plants, but chiefly belonging to the muscles of the heart and tissues of the lungs of the higher animals. Second group. — The true svigars, viz., cane-sugar, lactose (Latin, lac, milk) or milk sugar. The thii'd group mostly contains cellulose, or the chief substance for cell formation, i.e. starch, dextrine or starch- gum, and gluten. From all these various sugars alcohol can be obtained ; by direct fermentation from the glucose, and by the conversion of the second and third groups into glucose, and then into alcohol. Alcohol has also been obtained, though in small amounts only, by synthesis, or chemical composition. Fermentation is the general name applied to the first The meaning processes of nature's taking to pieces some organic com- of femen-'"^^ pound or body, either for further construction of organic Nation, life-supply ; or for dissolution into elements — the principle of life having fled. Fermentation (Latin, fervere, to boil) was a tei'm ori- ginally used concerning all phenomena where a liquid or pasty mass was seen to lift or bubble, discharging gas with- out an apparent cause. Chemically it means a reaction in which an organic compound under the influence of a ferment changes inadetermined sense atthe expense of the substance. It is now known that all fermentation is the work of The nature, -\^ -\ • . » , • • n 1 action, and so-called micro-organisms,* or active organisms so small influence of ferments ou * Micro-organisms called bacteria at once set feeding on the dead ^i^^- tissues ; but if excluded, or even through chemical processes stopped in their enterprises, fermentation ceases. 40 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. that, as Professor Fliigge, of Gottingen, states (in his work on Ferments and Micro-parasites, published at Leipsic, Zvly, 1883) : — " They stand on the border of invisibility, even to the eye armed with the best optical means, and yet, with their undreamt-of spread and deeply invading activity, play a most important role in the household of nature and the existence of man. They cause the destruction of life- less organic substances, occasion the oxidation of otherwise non-oxidable stuffs. They provide the plants continually with their chlorophyll " (Greek, klooros, light green) — " the green colouring matter of the leaves and stalks of plants — excite the most diverse fermentations, and to us they are an indispensable means of preparing our ordinary foods. . . . On the other hand, they live as parasites on our cultivated plants, and bring about their degeneration and death. They produce at times the severest diseases, both in lower and higher animals, and at times threaten man with murderous epidemics. ... In air, in earth, water, everywhere we find these same little organisms ; we recog- nize them in our nearest surroundings, in the home, in the food, as permanent companions, and incidentally as for- midable enemies. Most of these important little lives are plants of very elementary structure and the simplest procreative processes, but of extraordinary powers of multiplication. A few of them belong to the lowest animals. Pateofthe K 13, j^g -we have seen, alcoholic fermentation, though rirst Qis- . -■- coveryofthe known from prehistoric times, was not understood. Later real nature -^ ^^^ observed as limited to sweet substances, but the oi aicouoiic , "TIT ferments. secret of the fermentation processes has remained unsolved till our day. The real nature of the alcoholic ferments or yeasts as living fungi, was first discovered in 1835 by Cagniard Latour, and in 1837 the already mentioned German, Schwann, proved that the atmosphere is always charged with ferments. Since then the microscopic science, headed by such men as Kolliker, Pasteur, Liebig, Nageli, and others, has succeeded in revealing a universe of micro- scopic plants and animals. Generation ^\^q yeast fungi consist of single cells generated by fungi. sprouting, at one or both ends of the mother-cell, smaller membrane-like bladders which, filling with part of the contents from the mothex*-cell, gradually assume her form PRELDUXARIES TO THE STUDY OF MODERX DPJXKING. 41 and size, being divided from ter by a wall ; the procreation from cell to cell by this process is infinitelj rapid. By alcoholic fermentation, glucose is dissolved into from 30 to 31 per cent, alcohol, 60 per cent, carbonic-acid gas,* and a small portion of other compounds, the chief of them being from 2'5 to 5'6 per cent, glycerine, and 04 to 0"7 succinic acid, etc. All fermentations can be di-vaded into two groups : The lethal the one for maintaining life, and the other for producing ako^o^Uc^ death and dissolution into original elements. Alcoholic fermenta- fermentation belongs to the latter group, because, as far as known, alcohol can never be obtained from any living organism, substance, or chemic compounds containing life — death and decay being necessary pre-conditions for its natural production. And as alcoholic fermentation is a saccharine fermentation, and as saccharine fluids are inherent in all organic compounds — saccharine ferments being spontaneously present wherever saccharine fluids exist — and as all organic compounds are subject to the law of death and decay, it follows that all organic sub- stances, in a certain proportion to their saccharine con- tents, may be productive of alcohol, i.e. be alcoholizable. And these facts have been practically demonstrated in the various domains of nature by recent chemical experiments, though the alcohol discovered has been small in quantity, owing probably to its volatility and proneness to oxidation and further dissolution. Thus, for example, we are told by the French scientist Saccharine Muntz, that he had found traces of alcohol in water, and tion explains that he had reason to believe that the carburetted body I^cohoUound indicated by Boussingault and De Saussure as being m water, air, •^ ° ° and earth. * CarboiuG-acid gas forms 0*03 to 0"06 per cent, of the atmo- sphere. It streams forth from active volcanoes, as well as from, many fis3m:es in the earth, e.g. the Dog Cave at Xaples, the vapour caves at Pyrmont, Vichy, Haaterive, the Death Valley in Java, etc. Carbonic-acid gas is generally formed in plant or animal decom- positions ; for instance, wood, tallow, oil, are changed through atmospheric combustion into carbonic acid and water. Where organic substances are richly strewn in the ground there is also much carbonic acid, hence the presence of so much of this deadly gas in coal mines, etc. Animals expirate carbonic acid gas, because through oxidation, organic substances are solved into carbonic acid gas and water. 42 THE FOUNDATIOiSr OF DEATH. present in tlie atmosphere was alcoliol. And there is every reason to believe this to be a fact, there being always in the air, as in the water, saccharine compounds. So also, when we are told that there is alcohol in the soil, we have reason to credit it. We know the soil consists chiefly of the material residue of organic and inorganic decomposition, and of course in earth, as in air and water, alcohol is a product of the decompositions of saccharine particles. May not the carbonic-acid gas, or deadly vapour found especially in coal mines, be a residue in no small degree of the carbonic-acid gas formed in far distant ages by the alcoholic fermentation of the organic matter which h.as been through succeeding ages turned into coal ? And may it not be that the alcohol obtained through dry dis- tillation — i.e. through heat and exchision of air — is to some extent only the released product of natural ancient fermentations ? * Alcohol in In the preparation of bread the yeast changes the ^^^ ' starch into dextrine or grape sugar. In the further fermentation the grape sugar changes about 2 per cent, of the flour into carbonic acid and alcohol ; the carbonic-acid gas causes the sponginess of the dough, the alcohol in the baking evaporates. Bread kept for some days in a warm room through the action of spontaneous ferment re-acquires alcohol from, according to Bolas, 0'12 to 0"32 per cent., and if left longer it is soured by the action of acetic ferments into sour bread.f * " Alcohol trom Smoke. — The latest instance of the utilization of waste products is that effected at Elk Rapids, Michigan, with the gaseous matter given forth by a blast furnace in which are manu- factured fifty tons of charcoal iron a day. In the case to which we refer, the vast amount of smoke from the pits, formerly lost in the air, is now turned to account by being driven by suction or draught into stills surrounded by cold water, the results of the condensation being — first, acetate of lime ; second, methyl-alcohol ; third, tar ; the fourth part produces gas, which is consumed under the boilers. Each cord of wood produces 29,000 cubic feet of smoke, 2,900,000 feet of smoke handled in the twenty -four hours producing 12,000 lbs. of acetate of lime, 200 gallons of alcohol, and 25 lbs. of tar." — Louis- ville Medical Neiv,TS. Bec- querel and Rodier on the propor- tion of water in blood. I)r. Albin Koch on the same. Definition of poison. Division of poisons into two groups — Absolute and Incidental poisons. the proper consistence of all parts of the body. It has other important functions as a solvent. Soluble articles of food are introduced in solution in water. The ex- crementitious matters, which are generally sokible in water, are dissolved by it in the blood, carried to the organs of excretion, and discharged in a watery solution from the body." The French physicians, Becquerel and Rodier, in their treatise. Pathological Chemistry as applied to Medical Practice (Paris, 1854), state, as to the constitution of the blood, that it consists of — Water ... ... ... ... ... 781-600 Globules ... ... ... ... 135-000 Albumen ... ... ... ... ... 70-000 Fibrine ... ... ... ... 2-500 Chlorides of sodinm, potassium, magnesium, etc. . . . 3-500 And the Danish physician. Dr. Albin Koch, states that by dividing the blood into 1000 parts we find that it consists of 789 parts of water, 131 of blood-corpuscles, 71 parts albumen, and the remainder are salts, fats, etc. Water, therefore, is the overwhelming need of the system, as the sufferings from excessive thirst prove ; death by thirst is more rapid and distressing than by starvation. § 27. As by food is meant anything which feeds tissue or replenishes force, with innocency to the organism, so by poison is meant anything which, when taken into the body, does harm to it. Poisons may be divided into two groups — Absolute poisons, or such as &re always hurtful or useless, and Incidental poisons, such as are determined in their ill or good effect by the condition of the body ; and these may be interchangeable with the second and third groups of foods, according to the condition of the person taking them. Even the regular foods may at times act as poisons, and the absolute poisons act as foods, but such occasions are rare. Any substance not a food, if used as a food, acts as a poison. § 28. For an authoritative answer to the question whether alcohol is a food or a poison, we look naturally PHYSIOLOGICAL RESULTS. 65 to the physician ; but, unfortunately, the most renowned physicians differ in their opinions on the subject. Although for upwards of four centuries warning voices have from time to time been raised against the use of alcoholic drinks, it is only within the memory of the still living that these voices have been listened to in earnest. During the last thirty years — that is, since the establish- ment of a scientific system of physiology— scientists have laboured most indefatigably to find out what are the effects of alcohol. Some light has been gained, but only a very few points have been accepted as proven. Hundreds of able medical authorities have devoted much time and care to watching the phenomena of drink, and the records of these endeavours are a proud memorial to the sincerity and earnestness of the medical profession. The most eminent members of the medical profession The present have made public the apparently irreconcilable results of physicians their varied experiments. Others, seeinsr only the un- on fie . ' O «/ SUulGCt 01 certainty and confusion on the subject, have eluded the the use of difficulty by declaring the outcry against alcohol to be ^^'^°^°^- nonsense, and by affirming that while many perish from excessive drinking, those who drink moderately are benefited, and that if it is not indispensable for the preser- vation of health, it is of great importance to it. A still greater number — the rank and file of medical men — yet hold that alcohol is always bad for young people, but that for healthy adults, when taken in very small quantities, one to two ounces daily, it is, if not beneficial, at least harm- less. A few remain neutral as to its effects ; and a few take a decided stand against its use as a diink, and differ widely in almost every instance as to its use and value medicinally. We must, therefore, try, by a collection and careful analysis of comparisons and deductions, to arrive at the result. First, as regards alcohol itself. We saw in chapter iii. Theimpor- how important a role the recently discovered world of played by microscopic animals and plants, called ferments, play in the ^^^ ™' world economy of both life and death ; how it is through the in the visible activity of these minute creations that both animals and ^°''''^' 66 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. people are swept away by what are termed infectious diseases : for example, the rinderpest and plenro-pnenmonia among cattle ; the plague, yellow fever, and cholera among men. That, on the other hand, but for the activity of other kinds of these invisible forces, life would be impos- sible ; that it is by means of the diastatic ferments * that digestion becomes possible ; by means of this activity in- soluble albumen becomes soluble (peptone) ; starch and some cellulose are changed into dextrine or gi'ape sugar; fats are split up ; and cane sugar, which is insoluble in protoplasm, becomes soluble glucose. (These minute organisms, moreover, are the scavengers of nature.) especially in And WO saw that alcohol, which is obtained from the aiTOhoi."^ saccharine matters of grapes, cereals, potatoes, beets, etc. — that is, from the principal carbo-hydrates — is also the product of digestive or diastatic ferments (ferments that feed on the albuminous accompaniments of saccharine substances), such as those through whose activity starch and cellulose become grape sugar, and cane sugar becomes glucose. Is alcohol a Can alcohol be called a food on the ground that it supplies tissue ? I have already pointed out that the nutritive powers of foods depended on the proportion in which they held compounds of elements which could be made available for the renovation of the body ; and Alcohol is (chap, iii.) that hitherto alcohol has not been found in not found in j.i i- • • j. • ±^ j. j £ j the living the livmg Organism, except m the wastes and. reiuse, and organism, even in these only in infinitesimal traces, so loth is the occasional body to harbour alcohol. refuse*"*'"' ^^^ ^^ Science should succeed in discovering traces of alcohol in living tissue, it would be at most only in such infinitesimal quantities as those of copper and lead ; and surely no one, because copper and lead had been traced in the body, would suggest that we should supply ourselves with these compounds by the use of salts of copper and lead as foods ! * To these ferments belong the so-called ptyalin found in the Baliva, the ferments in the pancreatic juice which change starch into soluble glucose, also the ferments of the liver which act on the glycogen ; other ferments change cane and milk sugar into glucose. The hydrolytic or unknown processes of life are supposed to bo due to the activity of various ferments. PHYSIOLOGICAL RESULTS. 67 Dr. A. Baer, of Berlin, in his treatise on Drink Craving Dr. a. Baer (1881), states that " alcohol contains neither albumen, nor fi^'^o/jT' fat, nor any other substance either present in the animal food, organism or arising by chemical changes in the body and replacing a part of the same." We see everywhere ai'ound us, thanks to the progress of the temperance reform, people sound in mind and body, who never touch alcohol. The following very practical Dr. Kiein'g testimony to the uselessness of alcohol as a food 1 find in t^e worth- ° Dr. L. A. Klein's* lecture f on the effects of the use of l^^j^^f °^ alcohol during the siege of Paris : — food. " It was just the time when the wine-merchants are used to buy their stock for the year when the war broke out, so we had plenty of wines of every description. It was distributed by the Government very liberally indeed. "We drank because we had nothing to eat. We found most decidedly that alcohol was no substitute for bread and meat. We also found that it was not a substitute for coals. Ton know how cold the weather was during the winter. We of the army had to sleep outside Paris on the frozen ground, and in the snow, and when we got up in the morning we were as stiff as planks. We had plenty of alcohol, but it did not make us warm. We thus found out by bitter experience that alcohol did not make us warm, did not replace food of any kind, and did not replace coals. Let me tell you there is nothing that will make you feel the cold more, nothing which wall make you feel the dreadful sense of huns:er more, than alcohol." But thoiigh the conclusion is clear that alcohol is not Reasons for food, there are reasons for the general belief that it is ; that"aicohoi such, for example, as the outward appearances attending is food, its use, the heightened colour, the temporarily increased vivacity of mind and manner and surface temperature, the lessened requirement of regular foods ; all which seems to indicate that alcohol does, in some kind and degree, feed the system. It is also claimed that alcohol has in critical cases saved life that must else have been inevitably lost ; J * French staff-surgeon. t See Medical Temperance Journal, October, 1873. t There have been cases in which alcohol has been said to have Bnpported life. But it also appears to have been proved that life has 68 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. and when to this is added the scientific testimony that alcohol is a product of the chief carbo-hydrate, sugar — which is known to be one of the most important foods of the body — it is not strange that alcohol should have come to be generally regarded a food. The validity of all these reasons for such belief will be examined in due order when the particular results to the body from the use of alcohol come under consideration. Alcohol tried S 29. Here let us try alcohol by some of the ereneral by the tests .."'j.pj "^ ° of foods. tests or foods. 1. The regular foods are essential to life. It is positively proved that alcohol is not essential either to life or health. 2. The periodic need felt for regular foods ceases each time after being moderately supplied ; even the momen- tarily importunate craving (caused by some special want) when abundantly satisfied also ceases, or, if satiated or persistently denied, may even change to aversion. — With alcohol, the craving, if steadfastly denied, will gradually cease ; but if satisfied, it begets abnormal craving, and that craving, having once taken hold, becomes the most in- satiable of human passions. As Linnaeus said, " Man sinks gradually by this fell poison ; first he favours it, then warms to it, then burns for it, then is consumed by it."* 3. Regular foods, when taken in their proper ratio, are easy of digestion, and give the system a calm increase of vigour. — Alcohol deranges digestion and disturbs the action of nerve-tissue. To judge from these tests, therefore, alcohol is not only not a regular food, but, if used as such, acts as a poison. But alcohol is a product of saccharine fermentation; and sugar is a very important food. Dr. Flint on Dr. Flint says (op. cit.) — Ince^Fsugar " Sugar is an important element of food at all periods to nutrition. been maintained by chewing slioe-leather. Does this bring shoe- leather within the category of foods ? Life has also been said to continue quite anomalously, with a total absence of diet. Is-then nothing a food ? Whether alcohol is a supplementary or incidental food is dealt with later on in chapter x. on Therapevtiat. * Dissertatio Sistens Inebriantia,hj Dr. Linna;us, Upsala, Sweden, 1762 : " Agunt adeoque hsec inebriantia ut ignis potentialis qniin, radu, favet, calescit, urit, comburit." PHYSIOLOGICAL RESULTS. 69 of life. In the young child it is introduced in considerable quantities with the milk. In the adult it is introduced partly in the form of cane sugar, but mostly in the form of starch, which is converted into sugar in the process of digestion. With the exception of milk sugar, which is only present during lactation, all the sugar in the body exists in a form resembling glucose, into which milk sugar, cane sugar, and starch are all converted, either before they are absorbed or as they pass through the liver. In addition to these external sources of sugar, it is continually manu- factured in the economy by the liver, whence it is taken up by the blood passing through this organ. It disa])pears from the blood in its passage through the lungs. In the present state of science we are only justified in saying that sugar is important in the process of development and nutrition at all periods of life. The precise way in which it influences these processes is not fully understood." But the body, although richly supplied with and always Sugar never requiring sugar, never converts it into alcohol, not even in iXJaicohoi disease, and hence we see such use of sugar is foreign to in the the economy of the body. The oxidation of sugar in the even h*! "° body is an innocent process of breaking up into carbonic i'^*'^*'*7, acid and water. These products are eliminated by the nature of respiration, while the force released is used by the system, fgrmenta- Alcoholic fermentation results in two poisonous compounds, tion. alcohol and carbonic acid.* * The lethal or death nature of alcohol * is apparent in its very * " The Fermentation of Food in our stomach is performed after a manner imperceiatible, wherein all is quiet and silent, provided the Meats and Drinks be of a suitable Quality and not too great in Quantity." But in alcoholic fermentation — " when the sleeping silent Powers or original Properties in all sweet Liquors or Juice, are disturbed, as they are in a full or strong Ferment, all the Art in the World cannot incircle or tame them ; for Fermentation is an opposite and contrary motion to Nature and threatens the total destruction of the whole — being, as it were, a Death to the United Powers and Uni- form Principles, a destruction of Multiplication and prevention of all farther Progi'ession — and does, as it were, in a moment disunite — the original Forms become tumultuous, each Form with a rapid invading Motion laying, as I may say, violent hands on the sweet original Quality . . . for Fermentation in the strictest and best Sense, is no other than a certain vegetative and insensible Delirium of Madness ; all its operations when the Fermented Liquor is strong and Spirituous, 70 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Alcohol inimical to life. l)r. A. Car- lysle on this point. The in- fluence of alcohol on the human system, subject to various qualifying conditions. § 30. Tlie general effects of alcohol in the animal world are inimical to life. Dr. A. Carlysle, in his work, On the Pernicious Effects of Fermented and Spirituous Liquors, as Part of Human Diet (London, 1810), says that "no living animal or plant can be supported by such fluids, ... on the contrary, they all become sickly and perish under their influence." In the animal world the poisonous natui'e of alcohol is easily tested. Put only a few ounces of alcohol in a pail of water in which are living fish, and in a few minutes they will die. Or, expose a fly to alcoholic vapour in a closed vessel, and it will speedily die. In treating of the special effects of alcohol on the human system, it must be premised that these effects are greatly influenced by a variety of conditions, such as kind and purity of the alcohol or alcohols taken ; whether diluted or not ; in large or small quantities ; whether taken habitually or occasionally ; in health or disease ; by children or adults ; on full or empty stomachs ; the temperament of the taker, etc., etc. Still, excepting in rare instances, and only when the dose taken is very small, the trained observer can always trace harmful results from its iise by man ; and if observers of the physiological effects of alcohols on man had generally given due consideration to each of these qualifying conditions, there is good reason for believing that most of the contradictory results of experiments which now exist as a chief stumbling-block in the way of this study would have been reconciled or removed. componnds. The distillate called alcohol consists of a variety of poisonous substances. Besides the ethyl, amyl, and butyl alcohols, there are acetic aldehydes and ethers, essential oils, variously named ethereal and fusil oils, and a number of other volatile unknown com- pounds, all of which, when left at liberty, evaporate and dissipate beyond the ken of man. are in proportion ; and the same as being Disbanded from under the Government of its Superior Officers, so soon as a quantity of it is introduced into Man's Body, it plunders Nature of all its Sweet Virtues by drying and parching them up ; and at the same time breaks the Government of the Senses, turning Eeason and Wisdom adrift ; so that the Bodj^ is in no better Condition than a Ship without either Pilot or Eudder." — Tryon's Letters (Letter 37, " Of Fermen- tation"). London, 1700. PHYSIOLOGICAL RESULTS. 71 § 31. Alcoliol exercises two powerful iBfluences on the Alcohol's two essential means of the maintenance of life — foods and ^^rtful in- water ; viz., retardation of the processes of digestion and fluence on assimilation ; and interference with the aqueous nature of the blood, and hence two general harmful results — indi- gestion and thirst, both of which are considered, curable with alcohol, instead of with light, well-masticated foods and pure water, supplemented, at times — in extreme cases of indigestion — with artificial pepsine, etc. First, as regards the retardation of the processes of its effects in digestion and assimilation of foods by alcohol. Its effects digestiM. on the two classes of foods (nitrogenous and non-nitro- genous) is similar, though stronger in the case of nitro- genous foods, the albumen of which it coagulates. Of course the larger and stronger the dose the greater is its influence on digestion. It is a fact of common observation that drunkards may vomit half- digested or wholly un- digested food, hours and days after its ingestion, showing the power alcohol has to prevent digestion. But when alcohol is taken in small doses only, it is said to have quite a different effect — that of promoting instead of hindering digestion, by inciting a copious flow of the gastric secretion. The use of artificial means to restore natural processes to their original health, is the kind of work for which the physician is especially educated, and the means so used come under the general head of medicine. If alcohol acts as a promoter of digestion, it is acting as a medicine, and therefore belongs to the medicine chest and cannot be pre- scribed as a beverage, and should be treated of in this regai-d under the head of therapeutics. But the fact of the very general belief in and use of alcohol as an excellent tonic of digestion makes it necessary to deal with it here. In health, digestion is a natural process, which not only does not require, btit would be impaired by artificial pro- motion. In nearly all cases indigestion arises from irregu- larity at meals ; poor, badly prepared, ill-cooked, and insufficiently masticated foods ; want of exercise, or undue and ill-timed exercise, etc., etc., all aberrations from the normal conduct of the body. 72 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. A wise physician is familiar witli these things, and knows that a return to obedience to the simple laws of health will generally remove indigestion, and that artificial means are the last that can be properly resorted to ; and that when such are required, artificial pepsiue and a number of harmless compounds will serve his purpose. A profuse amount of gastric juice will, no doubt, digest food more rapidly than a small amount, and therefore the abundant secretion of gastric juice provoked by the daily taking of a small amount of alcohol may for some time promote digestion. But to urge digestion is no more desirable than to urge growth. What is pre-eminently desirable is that these processes shall be natural; that there shall be no extortion, which always involves two very bad things^ — exhaustion and waste. By the enormous exudation which alcohol causes from the walls of the stomach the alcohol is diluted and rendered less acrid. Unless the dose of alcohol be large, it is very quickly diluted and absorbed into the blood to pre- vent its acting mischievously on the digestion and the stomach. In this process the intense afiinity between alcohol and water plays an important part. Blood, as has been shown, consists overwhelmingly of water, and water is promptly difi^used into the alcohol in the stomach, at the same time that the alcohol is absorbed from the stomach into the blood by the water in it. The arrest of the digestion, therefore, is more or less affected and quickly superseded, by the completeness and rapidity of the entrance of the alcohol into the blood current. Trof. Dogiei Prof . Dogiel, in a paper on Monatomic Alcohols, read on the to Russian savants at Kasan, in 1873, said that the of its alcohol can be detected in the chyle of the thoracic duct, tnlr^ as well as in the blood, a minute and a half after its intro- biood. duction to the stomach. Now, the solving power in the gastric juice is the pepsine, as we know, but this is itself insoluble in alcohol, and when mixed with alcohol, is hindered in its own office by the coagulating influence alcohol exerts on the foods. Drs. Todd and Bowman, in their work. The Physiological Anatomy and Physiology of Man (London, 1856, chap. xxiv. On Digestion^, say, "The use of alcoholic stimulants also PHYSIOLOGICAL RESULTS. 73 retards digestion, by coagulating: the pepsine, and thereby interfering with its action. "Were it not that wine and spirits are rapidly absorbed, the introduction of them into the stomach in any quantity would be a complete bar to the solution of the food, as the pepsine would be pre- cipitated from solution as quickly as it w^as secreted by the stomach." It must, however, be noted that the alcohol, though. Alcohol a apparently helpful at the moment by procuricg a profuse PJyrJ.g'^of flow of gastric juice, secures this temporary effect at the chronic cost of great waste of this precious fluid, not only at the ^'^ '^^* '""' time, but by necessitating — because of the degradation of the blood of which gastric juice is an outcome — larger and larger recun"ent demands upon it, while steadily im- poverishing it in quality and weakening the activity of its solving power, the pepsine ; and the stomach, must ulti- mately become banki'upt from these extortions, and indi- gestion, with its train of countless diseases, must ensue. Dr. F. R. Lees, in his essay. Is Alcohol a Medicine ? Dr. F. R. (London, 1866), admirably sums up the effects of alcohol n,a^yyf^"e on digestion and the stomach in these words : — effects of " Should it be objected that, though alcohol cannot digestion!^ directly give force, it can aid the stomach to digest more food, which loill ultimately supply the material of tissue, I reply, this is a blunder in inference and a mistake in fact. For, firstly, alcohol has no advantage as a local stimulant over a little ginger or pepper, in exciting a flow of juice, but, as an angesthetic, interferes wdth perfect alimentation, and, in especial, arrests that change of matter in the body which supplies ih.Q valuable raaterial of the gastric juice itself. Hence, secondly, while more fluid may flow, it is not so strong in its digestive power. This, thirdly, agrees with fact, since a:bstainers have better and more regular appetites than moderate drinkers, and can eat and digest more. Fourthly, alcohol irritates the mucous surface of the debilitated stomach, though it may deaden the feeling of pain for a while. Fifthly, experiments have often proved that alcohol retards digestion, hardening the food and pre- cipitating the pepsine of the digestive juice." The effects of alcohol on the stomach itself depend, of course, upon the relative rapidity with which the alcohol 74 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. ivS drawn into the blood current, wHcli in turn depends greatly upon tlie relative amount and dilution of the alcohol (and the proportion of salts and ethers in the alcoholic liquor) at any one time present in the stomach ; the relative health and age of the taker ; the familiarity of his stomach with alcohol ; the power and activity of the excrementory organs, etc., etc., all of which are considera- tions absolutely essential to a scientific prescription of alcohol as a promoter of digestion, and some of which are quite beyond certainty of calculation. In one word — even on the assumption that alcohol may be used as a m.edicine, it is quite clear that no general prescription of it could ever be justifiable, but that prescription of it must always be based on a careful diagnosis of each particular case. If the stomach is little accustomed to alcohol and the dose taken is not very large, the damage done by it in a fairly healthy adult organism is comparatively smaU. The water yielded by the mucus of the stomach, as well as by the increased flow of the gastric jnice, for the dilution of the alcohol, together with the rapid absorption of the alcohol into the blood, co-operate to lessen the injury to the mucous membrane of the stomach. Dr. William Still, the results of the ingestion of alcohol are never Beaumont's innocent, and how little feelings and general signs indicate on the the real condition of the stomach, even after liberal in- tbe™auadian ^^i^lsr^nce in alcohol, was conclusively demonstrated in Dr. hunter, William Beaumont's * Experiments and Observations on the t. artm. Qdgf^lQ Juice and the Physiology of Digestion (Plattsburg, 1833). His observations were based on the phenomena exhibited in the famous case of the Canadian huntsman, Alexis St. Martin, who Avas accidentally shot, the ball entering his side and piercing the stomach. He recovered from the wound, but an opening remained, which was ■used " as a door by which to introduce substances into the stomach, and as a window through which to look in and examine effects." Dr. Beaumont tried St. Martin's stomach with alcohol, and as this hunter had been a man of temperate habits the results were most valuable. After a few days of free in- dulgence in spirits by St. !Martin, Dr. Beaumont made * Surgeon- General of the United States army. PHYSIOLOGICAL RESULTS. 75 these observations by means of the aperture in the patient's stomach : " The inner membrane of the stomach unusually morbid, the erythematous (inflammatory) appearance more extensive, the spots more livid than usual — from the surface of some of which exuded sviall drops of grumous blood — the aphthous (ulcerous) patches larger and more numerous, the mucous covei-ing thicker than common, and the gastric secretions much more vitiated. The gastric fluids extracted were mixed with a large proportion of thick ropy mucus, and considerable muco-purulent matter, slightly tinged with blood, resembling the discharge fi"om the bowels in some cases of chronic dysentery. Notwithstanding this diseased appearance of the stomach, no very essential aherration of its functions was nnanifested. St. Martin complained of no symptoms indicating any general derangement of the system, except an uneasy sensation at the pit of the stomach, and some vertigo, with dimness and yellowness of vision, on stooping downi and rising again ; had a thin yellowish- brown coat on his tongue, and his countenance was rather sallow, pulse uniform and regular , appetite good, rests quietly, and sleeps as usual."* Thus we find that in large doses alcohol arrests diges- Summary of tion and damages the mucous membrane of the stomach, a^ohoi^oa and in the proportion that it is undiluted ; that in small digestion, doses it rapidly leaves the stomach ; that in all except the most minute doses it provokes an extraordinary flow of secretion which is more or less wasted ; that this of itself — if alcohol be habitually taken — will, by constant overdraw- ing on the natural resources of the blood whence the gastric juice is distilled, impoverish the blood and degenerate the gastric juice, until impaired digestion becomes chronic indigestion. § 32. But we shall presently see that the action of alcohol in the blood accelerates this condition, because alcohol degrades the blood itself. As the gastric j uice is incapable of altering alcohol, it enters the blood as alcohol ; and as in the blood is the life, so anything injurious to the * The next observations made by Dr. Beanmont instanced the rapidity with which St. Martin's stomach recovered its normal con- dition after a very few days' abstinence, and he adds, "The free use of ardent spirits, wine, beer, or any intoxicating liquors, when con- tinued for some days, has invariablyproduced these morbid changes." 76 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. The effects of alcohol on the blood. The food elements in alcoholic drinks. The Lancet on the nutritious elements in wines. blood is hurtful to life. As in the case of food, alcohol, in being di-awn into the blood current, passes through the liver.* The general effects of alcohol on the blood (tissue in solution, both for renovation and what has been wasted) are to some extent similar to those it exerts on the food in the stomach ; it retards the oxidation of the food portions in the blood, and occupies as much as it can of the water contained in the blood. Hence there is an arrest of both the functions of the blood, the renewal of used-up tissue, and the carrying off of the refuse. The fact that alcoholic liquors almost always con- tain some residual undecomposed saccharine substances, which in themselves are feeding, and the fact that practical experiments have shown that under an alcoholic regimen there is an increase of bodily weight ; these two facts have greatly helped to spread the error that alcohol is food. I will therefore touch on these two points before pro- ceeding with the question of alcohol and the blood. § 33. It has already been shown that alcohol itself is not food ; that if food exists in alcoholic drinks it is not found in the alcohol, and therefore unsweetened spirituous liquors which (minus adulterations) consist almost wholly of alcohol and water, are not feeding — a truth made apparent in the lean and wasted appearance of spirit- drinkers. In the case of drinkers of sweetened spiritous liquors this truth is less manifest, and is apparently quite contradicted in the case of the consumer of malt liquors, by a robust and rosy appearance. It has already been seen from Dr. Klein's testimony regarding the use of wine by the French troops during the siege of Paris, that wine, used as food, proved useless and worse than useless. An analytical report in the Lancet (Oct. 26, 1867) says, as to the real amount of nutritious elements found in wines : — " In every 1000 grain measures of the clarets and burgundies tested, the mean amount of albuminous matter present was only 1^ grain, whilst in 1000 grains by weight of raw beef there are no less than 207 grains of such matter. That is, the quantities being equal, beef-steak is * In chapter vi. it will be seen that the organ which, next to the brain, suffers most from alcohol, is the liver. PHYSIOLOGICAL KESULTS. 77 156 times more nutritious than wine " so far as albumen is concerned. Of course this is not a fixed standard as to wines, which vary in the amount of food they contain (see chap, iv. on " Adulterations ") according to the perfection of the vinification. The poorer that is, the greater the proportion of undecomposed residual food matters, but the more dangerous also are these, especially as producers of gout. But malted liquors, beer, ale, and stout, are commonly Malt liquors supposed to be not only innocent but healthy and ^^^g'j^ered nutritious ; and that this notion is spreading appears from the fact that during late years the number of beer- drinkers is on the increase in almost all countries, and for this reason I wish to deal with the beer question more in detail. Some consider malt liquors to be harmless on the erroneous supposition that they do not contain the same alcohols as other intoxicants ; others base their notion of the innocency of such liquors on their knowledge that they ordinarily contain but a comparatively small amount of alcohol, and are therefore comparatively harmless. Malt liquors are held to be nutritious because they are prepared from malt, and because malt-liquor drinkers usually grow fat and bear a superficial appearance of health. In chapter iii, it was shown that the intoxicating prin- ciple in all unadulterated alcoholic drinks is the alcohol, and therefore, whether taken in large or small quantities, the tendencies to structural degeneration and the develop- ment of the " drink-crave " are the same in small beer as in rum or whisky. The glass of beer prepares the palate for the glass of whisky,* just as the taking of the penny or shilling prepares the way for the theft of the pound. The incipient stages of a downward career are nearly always * Beer-drinking is usually the starting-point for becoming a drankard, and malt liquors are especially dangerous by reason of the salt put into them. In an article on Drinks and Drinking (Eng- lish Mechanic, December 8, 1882), Dr. James Edmunds says, "One reason why beer-drinkers go back so soon and so repeatedly to the public-house is because salt is put into their beer for them ; the salt gives a certain piquancy to the flavour of the beer by irritating the nerves of the tongue, and it serves also to set the kidneys going, and bring the customer back to the public-house." 78 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Dr. Lyon Playfair on the relative feeding powers of barley and malt. The food in alcoholic drink is not in the alcohol, but in the rebiduals. seemingly innocent, but when the sincere mind, perceiving the danger, resists the insidious approach of evil, it quickly discovers that the gentle, scarcely perceptible first slips — ■ full of specious compromise and self-deception — hold the essence of the deepest fall possible. As to the last point urged in favour of beer-drinking, that it gives bulk and ruddy complexion, and hence that the barley in the beer must be as nutritious as it is in the loaf ; it will be seen that this also is fallacious. Malt liquors consist of from three to thirteen per cent, of alcohol, with more or less undecomposed albuminous residues of the saccharine matters in the malt, with some salts — and to this extent, therefore, beer is food. But, in the first place, malt is not quite so nutritious as grain. In speaking of the feeding of cattle with malt or barley. Dr. Lyon Playfair says, " Barley in the act of germinating loses a certain amount, both of the constituents which form the flesh and those which form the fat of the animal. A given weight of barley is therefore of greater nutritious value, both as regards the production of muscle and fat, than the same weight converted into malt."* It must be recollected that malt, in being turned into alcohol, goes through a process, like the grape and potato, of organic degradation, and therefore, though malt is food, it does not follow that the alcohol made from malt is food. In fact, if there is food in the alcoholic drinks, whether malted or spirituous, it is not in the alcohol, but in the residual substances that remain undecomposed. The fat in the beer-drinker is composed of these albuminous residues, which, having been alcoiiolized, resist the action of the various solvents in the system, and therefore, being neither fit for use in the body nor re- ducible to a form in which they can be excreted, they have to be stored away so as to prevent obstruction to the * Dr. Edmunds kindly writes mc on this point : " I am not sure that Dr. Playfair has seen the whole truth in relation to the use of malted grain as food for cattle. Granting that the quantity of energy derivable from malted grain is less than that from nnmalted grain, the question remains whether the greater solubility of the saccharized starch in malted grain does not in some cases ensure more perfect absorption into the system, and thus that in food value, for the practical purposes of fattening, malted grain may be of more value than unmalted." PHYSIOLOGICAL RESULTS. 79 circulation, and hence, so long as tliere is room, they are packed away immediately under the skin, and thus the fat and healthy appearance of the beer-drinker ! When there is no more room immediately under the skin, the fat has to be deposited in the interior of the body, and hence the common diseases of fatty degeneration of the kidneys, liver, heart, etc. Dr. J. W. Beaumont, in an. address on alcohol and Dr. j. w. nutrition (Sheffield, 1863), alluding to the fact that fh'eXracter brewers' men, who almost subsist on malt liquors, are of the fat ia remarkably fat, said, " This is conceded, but their stout- of'mait-''™ ness does not arise from the alcohol. Where obesity ''^"°'' results from drinking malt liquors, it is from the nutri- ment contained in the saccharine portion of the con- stituents of the beverage, and not from the alcohol." Dr. T. Lauder Brunton, in his paper on the Infltience Dr. T. L. of Stimulants and Narcotics on Health (contributed to the S'™"'" "" Book of Health, 1883), says that " Wine has a less power- ful local effect upon the stomach and intestines, and is less likely to destroy the digestive powers, than spirits. At the same time it does not contain any nutritious sub- stances in addition to alcohol, and so it does not tend of itself to fatten. Consequently, the wine-drinker is neither emaciated like the gin-drinker, nor bloated like the beer- drinker. As the beer-drinker takes beer in addition to other nutriment, he has a tendency to become fat and bloated at one time, although he may afterwards become thin and emaciated, from his digestion also suffering like that of the spirit-drinker. N^ot withstanding the apparent stoutness and strength of beer-drinkers, they are by no means healthy. Injui-ies which to other people would be but slight, are apt to prove serious in them ; and when it is necessary to perform surgical operations upon them, the risk of death is very much greater than in others." The credit of the discovery that alcohol is a food because I'r. Ham- it tends to increase the bodily weight, belongs to Dr. W. aicohofbeing A. Hammond, of New York, who, after practical experi- ^ ^''°^ ^^- ments upon himself, explains in his Physiological Effects tissue- of Alcohol and Tobacco upon the Human System (Phila- propgrtl^ delphia, 1863), that alcohol is a food, because it "increases the weight of the body by retarding the metamorphosis 80 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH, of the old and promoting the formation of new tissues, and limiting the consumption of fat." In an address to the New York Neurological Society (1874), Dr. Hammond (its president) reiterated these opinions, enlarging upon them in these words : " There are two facts which cannot be laid aside, and these are, that the body gained in weight, and that the excretions were diminished when alcoholic fluids were taken. These phenomena were doubt- less due to the following causes : first, the i-etardation of the decay of the tissues ; second, the diminution in the consumption of fat in the body ; and third, the increase of the assimilative powers of the system, by which the food was more completely appropriated and applied to the formation of tissues. After such results," says Dr. Ham- mond, " are we not justified in regarding alcohol as food ? If it is not food, what is it ? " Hence, Dr. Ham- mond concludes that alcohol is food, because it preserves tissue ! Irrespective of any scientific knowledge, it ought to be obvious that, if alcohol reduces appetite, and therefore consumption of food, and yet increases weight, it must be doing harm. The meaning But it is diflBcult to understand what benefit is expected Dreservatio ^'^ ^^ derived from the tissue-preserving properties of of tissue. alcohol. Tissue-preservation, if it means anything, must mean disease, just as much, though in an opposite sense, as fever means disease ; because tissue-preserving can mean nothing else but interference with the natural re- novation and depuration of the system, and that can scarcely be pointed to as an advantage, except presumably for prolonging life during starvation — a presumption with- out foundation — and possibly in wasting fevers, in which case, however, there would be required an intelligent com- putation as to whether or not the retarded oxidation would adequately compensate for the impairment of the blood. Health requires a proper balance between want and supply, and anything disturbing this balance produces disease — and retarded oxidation, which disturbs both of the processes which make the health balance, can be nothing but disease. As to the increase of his weight recorded by Dr. Ham- PHYSIOLOGICAL RESULTS. 81 mond, it miglit be due to conditions contrary to health. It is really curious what importance is attached to weight. It is well known that people of light weight have as good health, as much energy, capacity, and endur- ance, as heavy people, and very generally more, and that there are both light and heavy people who equally lack these precious blessings. Of course circumstances alter cases. Weight tells in forcing one through a crowd or mob ; boatmen and blacksmiths need it, but neither the athlete nor the boatman vrill use alcohol to increase his weight ! § 34. Let us now return to the considei'ation of the effects alcohol has on the blood, and in the course of the argument the real character of alcoholic tissue-preserva- tion will also become further apparent. In the opening of this chapter it was pointed out that blood is tissue in solution (water solution). On the main- tenance of the purely aqueous character of the blood, the supply and scavenging of the tissues greatly depend ; and no substance is innocent which, entering the blood, materially alters this condition. Alcohol falls by this test. Its coagulating and dissolving powers — which, thanks to the rapidity of its entrance into the blood, are not allowed at once to ruin the digestion and the stomach — have freer play in the blood-current, though the profuse saturation does lessen its harmful effects. Alcohol being itself a feebly oxidized body, it is eager Special con- to absorb oxygen wherever obtainable. The life-processes tifj^lnauence of the body depend on the combustion which continually of alcohol on • 11 ■, . A T_ ■ \. i. ■•• the blood. goes on m ail its parts. As was shown m chapter ui., oxygen is an essential factor in this process, hence the large proportion of oxygen in the body — and it is the function of the blood-corpuscles to carry oxygen to all portions of the system. Alcohol, because of its feeble oxidation, in entering the blood, seizes on this oxygen and takes as much of it as it can ; and, of coioi'se, the greater the amount of alcohol, the more oxygen does it withdi'aw from the blood, and hence the more is the com- bustion in the body retarded. And in ithe measure that the blood-corpuscles are robbed of oxygen, in that ratio do they also become degenerated. The German Dr. Carl H. Schuiz, as long ago as 1834, r>r. Cari h. „ Schulz on 82 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. alcoholic degeneration of the blood. ; Dr. Dumas, the physi- ologists Biicker and Virschow, Dr. Baer, Prof. Her- mann, and Prof. Dogiel on the same. demonstrated* that alcohol produces premature decay and death of the blood-corpuscles. " The colouring matter," he says, " is dissolved out of them, the white corpuscles lose their vitality, less oxygen can be absorbed, and less carbon carried off." (Dr. Dumas attributes the alcoholic degenera- tion of the blood to the action of alcoholic ferments feeding on the albuminous portions of the saccharine fluids in the blood.) And later experiments by such physiologists as Bocker and Virschow led to similar conclusions ; and Dr. Baer, in his Alcoliolismus (Berlin, 1878), quotes Prof. Her- mann, of Zurich, who, after experimenting with blood mixed with alcoholic vapour, describes the result as follows : — " It soon became apparent that the yellow blood chains or rolls, separate into their corpuscles, growing gradually paler until they wholly vanish." And Prof. Dogiel (op. cit.) says that alcohol rapidly causes the amoeboid movements of the white corpiiscles to cease, and that at a certain con- centi-ation the alcohol dissolves both the white and the red corpuscles. This fact is further confirmed by the con- dition observed in alcoholized blood when out of the body. Prof. Dogiel observed that blood from an animal under the influence of alcohol coagulates more slowly, and yields less fibrine than normal blood. He further found that if ethyl-alcohol be added to blood drawn from an artery, putrefaction is retarded. This would seem to indicate that the rate of putrefaction is very considerably determined by the amount of alcohol present in a corpse. He also found that arterial blood obtained from an intoxicated animal decomposes more quickly than the normal blood. Prof. Dogiel does not explain this, but it seems probable that it is because alcohol prevents healthy blood oxidation, and checks the removal of waste ; thus the blood becomes impaired and fetid, and when let out of the body, the alcohol evaporates, and the decomposing matters already in the body will then, of course, more rapidly decompose than would healthy blood. f If the blood contains about See De alimentorum cocfione experimenta nova (Berlin, 1834), and Die Wirkung des Brannhveins in der Trunksucht, in Huf eland's Journal fur pract. Heilkunde, April, 1841. t An indicator of impoverishment of the blood is the hair. In an old work, entitled Letter on the TJnwlwlesomeness and Destructiveness of Fermented, Distilled, and Spirituous Liquors, which PHYSIOLOGICAL RESULTS. 88 one per cent, of alcohol the vital functions are extinguished, as the flame of a candle is, in air containing a certain pro- portion of carbonic acid. About one-half per cent, of alcohol in the blood produces drunkenness so profound that all but the purely animal centres of nerve-life are in a state of suspended animation ; life continues, but only as the smoky flame of a candle burns in air surcharged with carbonic acid. Thus the whole process of nutrition becomes vitiated AicohoUc through the ingestion of alcohol. The blood, impoverished oltheS" itself, and I'obbed largely of oxygen (the means necessary 'i reiatioo to for its purification), can only partially fulfil its offices of ofthe'tissues! carrying new matter to the tissues, and of removing the used-up tissue ; and the alcohol, at the same time, hardens both the materials for new tissue making in the blood, and the refuse matter ; and this refuse, which in the ordi- nary course of healthy conditions would be cast out, is largely retained in the blood. The German Dr. Boker, by a well-devised and carefully Results of excuted series of experiments, proved that the presence of ^^- ^oker'f^ alcohol in the living system actually diminished the sum regarding'" total of elimination of effete matter daily. alcoholic p 1 1 1 1 • • • tissue-pre- ihe character or the alcoholic tissue-preservation is servation. further demonstrated in its action on the secretions from the kidneys. It is well known that alcohol increases the quantity of urine, but it is not equally well known that the secretion of urea, which forms about half the solid matter in the urine, and is the chief conveyancer out of the body of nitrogenous waste, is diminished by the action of alcohol, and that the portion by this means left in the body is rank poison to it. § 35. But the harm alcohol works to the whole nutrition is further intensified by its waste of water. Water, as was said in the introductory remarks on was republished in 1750, Dr. Hales, a physician distinguished for his careful physiological investigations, states — " It is the well-known observation of the dealers in hair for wigs, that they can distinguish the dram-drinker's hair by the touch, finding it harsh and dead- ended and unfit for use. ... It is also found that these pernicious drams not only alter the quality, but also, by their drying and corrosive power, lessen the quantity of hair ; and, what is a melancholy proof of the great prevalence of this wicked practice, there is now so much less hair to be bought among the lower people." 84 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. physiology, is even more important to life than foods are, and therefore a permanently continued insuificiency in the supply of water is even more injurious than a com- parative insufficiency of food. Water the Water is the means for cleansing the inside as well as anYcieanser outside of the body. If a considerable portion of salt* of the body, meat, for example, has been ingested, water is profusely inside fts wGll o ^ i */ as outside, sccreted for the dilution of its sharp principle and to wash it out. The blood, in consequence of this extra demand, becomes thick and unable to supply the necessary fluids to the tissues ; hence a call for water, i.e., thirsb. Now alcohol, besides being dangerous to the digestion, blood, and tissues (in the measure that it is undiluted), and hence forcing the body in self-defence to saturate it with water (as it does an over-dose of salt, for example), * In his prize essay On the Use and Abuse of Alcoholic Liquors in Health and Disease (London, 1849), Dr. William B. Carpenter admirably exposes the assumed resemblance between alcohol and salt as an essential to health, or at least a healthful commodity. He says, " It has been maintained that although alcohol cannot itself serve as an article of nutriment, yet that, like salt, it is a valuable adjunct to other articles ; and that, although in large quantity it may be decidedly noxious, yet that in small it may be very beneficial. Now, strange to say, the substance with which it has been thus com- pared is that of all others to which it will least admit of being truly likened. For salt is not a mere casual adjunct to our necessary food, but is itself an indispensable ingredient of our diet. It is contained in large proportion in the blood, and in every fluid that is secreted from it, and enters into the composition of most of the tissues. It is present, too, in most of the ordinary articles used as food, vegetable as well as animal ; and when this natural supply is deficient, the instinctive craving, both of man and animals, leads them to resort to other sources, from which their bodies may derive the supply necessary for the maintenance of their normal or healthful constitution. Moreover, there is a vei'y beautiful provision in the economy for the immediate excretion of any superfluity of this substance, which passes out of the body nearly as rapidly as it is taken in ; so that it is prevented from ever accumulating to an imdue amount in the blood ; and the only mischief which an overdose of it can occasion is the production of a temporary irritation of the stomach, occasioning a craving for water, which speedily works a cure by carrying off the offending matter. Now, all that salt is, alcohol is not. It is not one of the proper components of the blood or of the tissues, and its presence in the circulation is entirely abnormal. There is no in- stinctive or natural craving for it." PHYSIOLOGICAL KESULTS. 85 has, as before stated, a chemical aflBnity for water, and therefore occupies it, in spite of the protests of the body that no more can be spared. And thus we have one source of the ^'' drink-crave,^^ The"drink- which, as will be shown later on, becomes at last, by the resuft of* degeneration of the nervous system, almost like a consti- thirst. tutional need. " If drinking be long continued," says Dr. Er- Flint on Austin Flint (op. cit.), "the assimilative powers become '®P°'"- so weakened, that the proper quantity of food cannot be appropriated, and alcohol is craved to supply a self- engendered want" — {i.e., the want first engendered by the deluding action of alcohol is met and momentarily beguiled, only to be re-created by the originating agent of the want). "The organism may in many instances be restored to its physiological condition by discontinuing the use of alcohol ; but it is generally some time before the nutritive powers become active, and alcohol in the meantime seems absolutely necessary to existence." The foe is met by the system, at the very entrance xhe exaction (the mouth), by water. Instantly that alcohol enters the ^adeby mouth, it is mixed with a profuse secretion of saliva, yielded upon the by the salivary glands in obedience to the sig-nal from the ^at^rofthe -11 •• •ii/~ip system. nerves m the mouth communicating with them. Of course the same demand for water is made everywhere through- out the body, in order to quench the flames of the burning element as it enters the stomach, as it courses through the blood-vessels, and as it is expelled from the system. It is well known that, after a night's drinking bout, the drinker's mouth in the morning is hot and dry. Why ? Partly, no doubt, because of temporary paralysis of the salivary gland nerves, but also because the drain upon and waste of the water of the system has been too great to admit of a sufficient preparation of saliva in time for breakfast. And when we remember that the body consists of from seventy-five to eighty per cent, of water, and that saliva — so essential to digestion under the best circumstances — is more necessary than ever when the whole nutritive system and processes have been weakened and deranged — it becomes still more apparent how much harm alcohol does to the body. Owing to ignorance about alcohol, the drinker, if he Thesystem's can, meets the body's demand for water with some alcoholic nei-d of water mis- 8G THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. understood drink, i.e., alcohol and water, but lie feels only partial satis- airohor'^ ^""^ f action therefrom, because the water found in the drink he takes has only been enough to partially satisfy the water demand. Drinkers of alcoholic beverages decry water-drinkers for the quantities of cold w^ater they pour down their throats. As a matter of fact — incontestable fact — alcohol- drinkers take a great deal more of cold water than do water-drinkers. There is, of course, no essential differ- ence in the systemic construction and needs of an alcohol and a pure- water drinker. Both require an equal amount of water for the performance of their life functions. They obtain about the same amount of water from their foods, although, as a rule, the pure-water drinker eats more than the alcohol-drinker, and therefore, perhaps, ordinarily speaking, gets somewhat more water from his food. But as to the ingestion of water as water, the alcohol- drinker must drink a great deal more than the water-drinker, because not only does the alcohol-drinker's system have continually to wash out and dilute the alcohol, but the alcohol itself also calls for water on its own account ; hence further thirst, the call for more water ; and the call is met, but only in connection wdth more alcohol also. And the more anxiously the system cries out for pure water to quench its thii-st, the larger and stronger doses does the ignorant victim of alcohol pour down his throat ; and if not stayed by the hand of Mercy, his thirst will not be slaked except by the waters of Death. The mischief § ^6. But it is not Only the blood itsclf that is harmed alcohol does 'by alcohol ; just as it wounds and scorches the mucous vessels. ' membrane of the stomach, so it ruins the blood-vessels. Dr. James In his lecturc on Alcohol as a Medicine (London, 1867), Ihis pi^il*"" ^^- James Edmunds says— " The blood carries certain earthy matters in it in a soluble state, these earthy matters being necessary for the nutrition of the bones and other parts of the body. You all know that when wine is fermented and turned from a weak sweet wine into a strong alcoholic wine, you get what is called a ' crust ' formed on the inside of the bottle. What is that crust ? Why is it formed ? That ' crust ' consists of saline or earthy matters which were soluble in the saccharine grape- juice, but which are insoluble in the PHYSIOLOGICAL RESULTS. 8/ alcoholic flaid. We find in drunkards that the blood- vessels get into the same state as the wine bottles from the deposit in their texture of earthy matter which has no business to be deposited, and forms, as ifc were, a ' bees- wing ' or 'crust' in the blood-vessels of the drunkard, in his eye, and in all the tissues of his body. The result is the tissues get weak and brittle, and in performing their duties they break down ; thus the blood-vessels burst under a little unusual strain, and we get apoplexy and sudden death, and paralysis and slow miseries of all sorts." In a letter to me March 24, 1884, Dr. Edmunds thus elucidates this point : — " Just as when earthy salts are thrown out of solution in ordinary water by merely boiling it, a fur is deposited inside the kettle ; so the wine, during its maturing process, deposits certain saline earthy matters on the inside surface of the bottles, forming what is called the 'beeswing,' and wines in the blood make similar deposits on the sides of the blood-vessels. The ' beeswing ' looked for by the drinker in the wine-bottle, is looked for by the physician in the eye of the wine-drinker, as the well-known arcus senilis. This arcus senilis is only an out- ward and visible sign of general internal change, such as earthy degeneration of the arteries, fatty degeneration of the heart, cirrhotic degeneration of the liver and kidneys."* And with such attested results on the blood and sir James tissues from the use of alcohol, it is no wonder that ^^^^^l^ Sir James Paget should warn his disciples against operating against on drinkers, even "moderate" ones. operations oa " Be rather afraid," he says, " of operating on those, of ™?^^^**g® whatever class, who think they need stimulants before they work ; who cannot dine till after wine or bitters ; who always have sherry on the sideboard ; or are always sipping brandy- and- water ; or are rather proud that, because they can eat so little, they must often take some wine. Many people who pass for highly respectable, and who mean no * Dr. Henry Munroe, in his lecture on the Physiological Action of AlcoJiol (Temperance Tracts, New York, 1874), states that "the eminent French analytical chemist, Lecanu, found as much as 117 parts of fat in 1000 parts of a drunkard's blood, the highest estimate of the quantity in health being 85 parts, while the ordinaiy quantity is not more than two or tkree parts ; so that the blood of the drunkard contains forty times in excess of the ordinary quantity." 88 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Various theories as to what be- comes of alcohol after its entrance into the blood. Baron I^iebig's theory. Pr. Flint on the function of fat. T)T. Drysdale on the relative harm, are thus daily damaging their health, and making themselves unfit to bear any of the storms of life." When the effects of alcohol on the nervous system come under consideration, it will be seen how the blood- vessels suffer still further by the paralyzing tendency of alcohol on the nerves controlling the vascular system. § 37. The next point regarding alcohol and the blood is what becomes of the alcohol after it has entered into the blood-current. No point in the whole alcohol controversy has been more hotly debated than this, and even to-day the medical world and the physiologists stand divided upon it, in numerous camps, under many leaders. The first really earnest endeavours of science to clear up this point are of comparatively recent date. The first theory to receive any general adherence was that started by Baron Justus von Liebig, some forty years ago, viz., that as alcohol was obtained from the heat-generating foods, it must be a heat-generator; that just as alcohol in being burned in a lamp is transformed into carbonic acid and water, while its energy is liberated as heat, so likewise is it oxidized in the body, and transformed into the same two compounds ; and hence alcohol must be a heat-gene- rator, and, in that sense, a food. The absolute proof recently obtained that a chief effect of the ingestion of alcohol is the reduction of heat, of course disproves this theory in toto ; but there are various other effects, which, as will be seen later on, militate against Liebig's theory. His theory is, at best, based on pure assumption, viz., that alcohol is to be classed with sugar and fat as special heat-generators of the body. Dr. Austin Flint {op. cit.) says on this point, " There is no sufficient ground for supposing that fat has any such exclusive function " (that of producing heat) ; " its office is in connection with the general process of nutrition." As to sugar, he says, " In the present state of science we are only justified in saying that sugar is important in the process of development and nutrition at all periods of life. The precise manner in which it influences these processes is not fully understood." And Dr. Drysdale, in a lecture on the death-rate of abstainers and non-abstainers (London, February 25, PHYSIOLOGICAL RESULTS. 89 1884), wittily observed that if alcohol was a food, then merits of another heat-producer, paraffin, might as well be counted pafaffin'^as^ in on the same grounds. respiratory ° foods. Liebig's theory gained numerous adherents, and even to-day holds a place in the medical world. Some fifteen years elapsed before any effective opposition could be made to it, but in 1860 there appeared a work by three leading French physicians, L'Allemand, Perrin, and Duroy, entitled Theories of The Bole of Alcohol (Paris, 1860), which took the opposite pe'^Hn'°J,';j''' view, declaring that alcohol leaves the body just as it Duroy 'as to enters it, that is, as alcohol. comes of From numerous most careful experiments on animals aicouoi. — compared with such as it has been possible to make on man — which established the identicalness of alcoholic effects on beast and man, they concluded that alcohol is neither oxidized, i.e., converted into carbonic acid and water, nor changed into aldehydes and acetic acids in the organism, but that it remains unchanged, and is expelled as alcohol through the lungs, skin, and especially the kidneys. Says Dr. Perrin, Perrin, in his article on the Physiological Action of ^^of. J. Alcohol in the Encijclopcedic Dictionary of Medical Sciences Bouchardat (Paris, 1865), "There is not found in the blood or the andSandras ^ . , . ^ . .on the same. expired air any trace of the ti'ansiormation or destruction of the alcohol. It accumulates in the nerve centres and in the liver, and finally it is excreted through the diverse channels of elimination. Hence the conclusion that the alimentary role of alcohol has no other pretence to a scientific basis than that of an experimental error." Neither of these opposing theories has been universally accepted, and the great body of physicians stand between these two — that is, they believe that alcohol is in part oxidized and in part excreted, unchanged ; but they differ widely as to the amount oxidized as well as the form of oxidation. The followers of Bergeron think that most of the alcohol, after remaining some time, is expelled, and a small part only oxidized. Prof. J. Bauer, on the other hand, in his Foods and Dietetic Cure for Sick People, which forms the first part of Prof. Ziemssen's Handbook of General Medicine (Leipsic, 1883), affirms that the greater part of alcohol is oxidized, " being changed into carbonic acid and water," while " a 90 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Difficulty of arriving at certain con- clusiuus. A possible solution to be fouiiil in the hydro- lytic ferments. small portion of the alcohol is in unchanged form put forth from the body through the skin, lungs, and kidneys." Others — as, for instance, Drs. Bouohardat and Sandras, and their large following, who hold that alcohol is partly oxidized and partly excreted — claim that the oxidized portion is converted into acetic acid. An infinite variety of opinions exists as to how and in what proportion alcohol is oxidized or excreted. § 38. It is a difiicult matter to deduce a tenable theory from analysis, comparison, and combination of the various leading opinions on this point. One thing, however, seems clear, that the Liebigian theory cannot be correct, because, were alcohol a heat-generator, the heat of the body must be increased by the taking of alcohol, which, as we now know positively, is not the case. This and other arguments against the theory of Liebig will be considered later on. On the other hand, the failure of the most careful and exact efforts to obtain from the excretions of the body anything like the ingested amount of alcohol, goes strongly against the theory that all the alcohol passes through and out of the system, unchanged. Alcohol is a baffling and mysterious thing. Other poisons, vegetable as well as mineral, generally single out some specially vulnerable part of the system in which to do their fell work ; but alcohol attacks the whole system (with some special preference for the liver and brain), by this diffusion making both the apj)arent degeneration of the system more generally even, and hence less con- spicuous, and the tracing of its results in the system also more difficult. But as under some circumstances portions of alcohol certainly disappear, it must be that the body, in some manner unknown to us, is able to dispose of a certain amount. If Science would turn its ferreting eye in this direction, it may be that a clue to this mystery would be found in the discovery of some compound in the body of the drinker, not existing in that of the non-drinker. It is certainly not an unreasonable supposition that some of those hydrolytic (hidden) ferments, whose office and functions so puzzle the physiologist, may have a part in this mystery also. PHYSIOLOGICAL RESULTS. 91 One thing can be affirmed, that in whatever way the body may be able to dispose of alcohol, there is in that fact no valid argument weighing against the evidence that it is out and out a poison, foreign to the system (being found, if at all, only in infinitesimal traces in the excrementitious matters), and that it damages and deranges the whole nutritive and circulatory processes, and also, as will presently be shown, particularly injures the nervous system. When alcohol is taken in large doses, we know that some of it is excreted in unchanged form. A small part goes direct from the stomach, out, as refuse ; some is evidently exhaled, judging both from the foetid breath and from the fact that a small percentage of the ingested alcohol can be traced in the exhalations. Dr. E. Gr. Figg (op. cit.) says, " Though I might Dr. E. G. propound a very ingenious theory to show that the human pJffence*of stomach, with its purse-like cardiac opening, is an elastic alcohol in bottle, and that the affinity of alcohol for water rather and in the than for either of its elements, would preclude the possi- ti''*"^- bility of its decomposition, I prefer tangible facts to plausible speculation. Having induced an individu.al to swallow a glass containing two ounces of spirit (eleven degrees above proof), I made him breathe through a tube, the opposite extremity of which was submerged in a tumbler containing two ounces of water, covered with a bladder skin to prevent evaporation ; the fluid became speedily impregnated with the characteristic odour of alcohol. To meet the scepticism which might endeavour to establish an analogy between this fluid and the essential oil of lavenders or other fragrant substance, the perfume of which has been known to pervade the atmosphere of a room for weeks (without any appreciable diminution in the quantity or quality of the original mass), and to anti- cipate the inference that the bulk of the alcohol had actually been decomposed and appropriated, though from its volatile nature an infinitesimal portion had escaped that process, and was then being discharged at the lungs, I varied the experiment by causing a person intoxicated for several hours to give sudden short expii"ations through a tin funnel used for decanting liquids, the narrow ex- 92 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. tremity of which, was in proximity to a gas-jet. The contemporaneous evolution of blue lambent flame an- nounced the presence and density of the spirit." The writer of the article Alcohol in Dr. James Hinton's Physiology for Practical Use (London, 1880) Alcohol says, " If the breath of a person who has di'unk so fn^the^'^'^*^ little even as a glass of light ale, containing three drachms expirations. Only of Spirit, be conveyed through a test solution of mntoii's chromic acid (one part bichromate of potash in three hun- physioiopy dred of pure sulphuric acid, its delicacy is so OTeat that TOT PvCLCtXCCtl • •/ o Use (London, the presence of -yko ^^ ^ grain of alcohol can be detected by 1880). jti), the presence of alcohol can be attested by a distinct colour-change." Alcohol is also under these circumstances traceable in the urine, and in all probability it is also thrown off by the skin. Dr. E. G. Figg, in his lectures On the Physio- logical Operation of Alcohol (Manchester, 1862), says, " In alliance with the organs of the lungs and liver we Aicohoiaiso have the shin, a depurating medium. ... In cases of skfnTvapo- hepatic obstruction, as calculi in the biliary common duct, i)*'*E^G ^^ ^^ onus of carrying off the bile is thrown on the skin and Figg." kidneys, as evidenced in the surface of the one and the colour of the secretion of the other — a responsibility in which the lungs and intestines do not participate, though the circulation has equal access to all. The fact that the skin aids the liver in effecting the exit of noxious elements in the circulation, accounts for the pustular excrescences on the face and body of the drinker. It is not the agency of the alcohol which produces them, but the carbon ; the partial result of the disintegrated saccharine and adipose tissues, retained in the arterial vessels by the alcohol monopolizing the pulmonary capillaries in effecting its escape." Pr. T. L. Dr. T. Lauder Brunton (op. cit.) says, " The skin is thTsame."" ^^ ^^^t Boft, with a slight satiny feeling, from which I have seen Prof. Neumann discover the alcoholic ten- dencies of a patient ; and perspiration is easily induced. Later on, the skin becomes thick and discoloured, some- times red and sometimes sallow, and becomes liable to various diseases, the best known of which is acne rosacea, often called bottle-nose. Besides this, the skin may be affected with inflammation of various sorts, leading to the PHYSIOLOGICAL RESULTS. 93 formation of ulcers, vesicular, soaly, or pustular eruptions, boils, and abscesses." And as the skin, besides its depurating' office, is also the moderation- valve of the heat in the body, this affection of the skin is of great consequence to health. As to the action of the kidneys in the elimination of alcohol, an eminent physician writes to me that having with a catheter drawn off the urine from a patient under temporary alcoholic paralysis of the bladder, who was therefore unable to pass it naturally, he found by careful distillation that this urine contained '2275 per cent, of alcohol ; i.e., rather more than 4^ of its volume consisted of absolute alcohol. A certain amount of. alcohol has been found in various parts of the body of persons who have died in an intoxicated state. L' Allemand, Perrin, and Duroy (op. Drs. L'Aiie- cit.) found alcohol in the proportion of 1'34 per cent, in and'ouroy'"' the brain. They were, however, by no means the first to 0° alcohol in make such observations. The late Rev. John Guthrie, in his Temperance Physiology (Glasgow, 1877), quotes the following fi'om the statement made by Dr. William Beaumont in an addi-ess to the Vale of Leven Temperance Society (in 1830) as to a post-mortem examination : — " ' I Dr. Wiiiiam dissected a man who died in a state of intoxication after a the s^ue. °" debauch. The operation was performed a few hours after death. In two of the cavities of the brain, the lateral ventricles, was found the usual quantity of limpid fluid. When we smelled it, the odour of the whisky was dis- tinctly perceptible ; and when we applied the candle to a portion in a spoon, it actually burned blue — the lambent blue flame, characteristic of the poison, playing on the surface of the spoon for some seconds.' Some doubts having been expressed in regard to these and other cases of alcohol being detected in the brain, Dr. Ogston, of Aberdeen, said at the time, ' I am happy to be able to add one case to their number. The body of a woman, aged foi'ty, of the name of Cattie, who was believed to have drowned herself in a state of intoxication, was found on the 23rd of August, 1831, in the Aberdeenshire Canal. In company with another medical man, I was requested to examine the body, in order to report the cause of 94 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH, death, no one having witnessed the act. We discovered nearly four ounces of fluid in the ventricles, having all the physical qualities of alcohol, as proved by the united testimony of two other medical men, who saw the body opened, and examined the fluid.' " Dr. John Dr. John Percy, in his essay * An Experimental In- thesame. quiry Concerning the Presence of Alcohol in the Ventricles of the Brain after Poisoning by that Liquid, etc. (Notting- ham, 1839), states that by distilling blood drawn from an alcoholized system, he had been able to obtain a fluid which, by its dissolving camphor and burning with a bluish flame, proved itself to be alcohol. In the brain he found proportionately still more, from which he concluded that a " kind of afl&nity existed between alcohol and the cerebral matter." Dr. Figg (op. cit.) mentions the following noteworthy case : — " John Carter, a young athletic man, di'ank a pint of rum at one efi:ort, dying comatose half an hour subsequently. On the authority of a coroner's warrant, two medical men (myself one) opened the body. The mouth, oesophagus, stomach, cardiac cavities, and lungs presented no appreci- able trace of the rum. Even on opening the cranium, we found nothing to warrant a supposition of its presence. On making a section into the lateral ventricles, however, it flowed out in considerable quantities, altered in coloui% with its characteristic odour." HeiT Kuyper On this same point, the Lancet (October 27, 1883) says — • "'^ ^^^ , " In the Zeitschrift fur anah/tische Chemie (Journal of presence of . -i • ^ r~^^ ■ \ tt -it- t i <• alcohol in Analytical bhemistry) Herr Kuyper records the tact that the brain. j^^ -j^^g ascertained by distillation the presence of alcohol in the brains and liver of two persons wlio had fallen into the water when di-unk and had been drowned. In one brain he found about one-fifth of a cubic inch of alcohol, and in one Hver a little over half a cubic inch." When we come to the consideration of the effects of alcohol upon the nervous system, and the reflex action of the latter on the tissues and vascular system, it will be seen that large doses of alcohol paralyze the nerve centres, and thus the necessary orders for its expulsion, reduction, and change — which are given by the nervous system in * A gold medal was awarded by the Medical Faculty of the University of Edinburgh for this essay. PHYSIOLOGICAL RESULTS. 95 the case of smaller doses — are not forthcoiniDg, and hence the enemy remains in possession of the strong-holds until the nervous system can^rally sufl&cient forces to give the requisite orders. § 39. The consideration next in order is that of the Effects of effect of alcohol on the temperature of the body. The alcohol on temperature of warm-blooded animals — man included— ture ITthl ' depends chiefly on two conditions, viz., the amount of ^°'^y- combustion within the body, and the radiation of heat from the body. These two conditions mutually assist each other in keeping up an even temperature of the body, about 98-6° Fahr. The functions of life are gi'eatly affected by even small changes of temperature, and only a few degrees above or below the normal mean will extinguish life ; therefore anything which causes great fluctuations in bodily tem- perature is dangerous to health and life. It is at present generally admitted that alcohol lowers the temperature of the system, but not until recently has this fact been f ally established. As early as 1840, the French physicians, Drs. Dumeril, opjnionsthat Dumarquay, and Lecoint claimed to have discovered that alcohol the taking of alcohol reduced the temperature of the body, temperature and shortly after the German physician ISTasse announced of the body— the same idea, and at about the same time Dr. Prout, of Dumerii, London, strengthened these claims by combating the anirLecohft' oxidation theory on the ground that his experiments with i^r. Nasse, moderate alcoholic doses had shown a reduction in the t>1' pav'ies, exhalation of carbonic acid. Were Liebig's theory of ^'■•i^'"'>'i' alcoholic combustion into carbonic acid and water correct, and Brs. ' the amount of carbonic acid exhaled would be increased, 51''"'^"?" . ' rieaumetz as well as the temperature of the body heightened. and Audige. In 1850, Dr. Davies, of Chicago, U.S., published the results of his extensive series of experiments as to the effects of different articles of food and drink on the tem- perature of the body, as well as the amount of carbonic acid exhaled from the lungs. He says — " These experiments proved conclusively that during the active period of digestion after taking ordinary food, whether nitrogenous or carbonaceous, the temperature of the body is always increased; but after taking alcohol, in the form, of either fermented or distilled drinks, the tem- 96 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Practical proofs that alcuhol reduces the temperature of the body. perature begins to fall within half an hour, and continues to decrease for from two to three hours. The extent and duration of the reduction of temperature was in direct projjortion to the amount of alcohol taken." Notwithstanding these and many other convincing testimonies — by Dr. Edward Smith,* of London, for ex- ample — the question remained almost at a standstill until the publication in the Practitioner of September, 1869, of Prof. Binz's article on the Influence of Alcohol on the Tempei-ature of the Body. This revived the issue. Prof. Binz stated that from numerous experiraents which he had made with small doses of alcohol, using the centigrade thermometer, he had found that the experiments proved that small quantities of alcohol lowered the temperature considerably. Half a glass of light hock, or a small glass of cognac, caused a fall of from 0"4° to 0"6° in a very short time. In experi- ments upon dogs with fatal doses, there was a fall in the temperature amounting to between 4° and 5°, in from one to two hours, at which period death took place. The recent magnificent experiments on pigs by Drs. Dujardin-Beaumetz and Audige, at Paris (La Temperance, No. 1. Paris, 1884), seem to absolutely preclude the possi- bility of further controversy on this point — that the in- variable result of the use of alcohol as a drink is the lower- ing of the temperature, even though at first it may increase it. During the campaign in 1812 in Russia, so fatal for France, it was found that almost all those soldiers who used alcoholic drinks succumbed to the cold and fatigue, while only a small proportion of abstainers fell victims to these rig'ours. The Esquimaux, Greenlanders, Laplanders, and other inhabitants of the coldest regions of the globe, have prac- tically experienced that alcohol unfits them for enduring their climates. As regards the Laplanders ; some years ago it was feared by the Swedish Government that the race would fi'eeze to death because of drink. An intelligent Laplander, while on a visit to Stockholm, was converted to total abstinence, and became its apostle in his native land with * Author of Practical Dietary, London, 1865. PHYSIOLOGICAL RESULTS. 97 such success that the fears of the extinction of this in- teresting race have disappeared. Alcoholic drinks are generally dispensed with in Arctic expeditions, experience having shown that thej chill instead of warm. The mercantile and war navies of several countries have abolished the use of alcoholics by their sailors ; others, among them those of England, do not prohibit the use of liquors in the fleet, but offer a petty inducement as a premium on abstention, giving instead of liquors good coffee and tea. It is the invariable testimony that abstainers are best capable of enduring fatigue and withstanding the fury of the elements. Some defenders of Liebig's theory have sought to Plausible reconcile the oxidation of the alcohol, and the fall in recondtiiig bodily temperature, by asserting that the heat srenerated ^^'^ f''" "^ m the combustion of the alcohol is rapidly reduced by with the skin-radiation resulting from the effects alcohol exerts in Liebigian ,., ,. .,, . * combustion dilating the capillaries. theory. Even though this reasoning were sound, it can scarcely be said to mend matters ! Liebig's disciples defend the use of alcohol only on the gi'ound of its being a respiratory food. But if the heat thus generated is more than balanced by the heat given out, it is not easy to see what good can come from its use as a heat-generator. Were this explanation a true one, there would surely be that in it which should lead the advocates of the use of alcohol to pause. What a truly extraordinary procedure on the part of the body — to surrender warmth so necessary to health, and which under normal circumstances it would never let go ! It would almost seem, figuratively speaking, as if alcohol, taking life by the throat, forced the life-current to spring to the surface for air and strength to combat its throttler. As we have already seen, it is chiefly by means of skin-radiation of heat, properly proportioned to that generated by combustion within, that the mean tempera- ture is maintained ; and the rapidity and amount of such radiation depends on the porosity of the skin, and the intimacy of the connection between the blood-filled capillaries and these safety-valves. Now, fat is a non- H 98 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. conductor of heat, and, being placed immediately under tlie skin, prevents the ordinary radiation of heat. (Hence one reason why fat people suffer so much from heat.) But if the Liebig radiation theory were true, fat drinkers would scarcely suffer any reduction in bodily temperature as compared with persons in normal flesh. Under certain conditions taking a small quantity of alcohol causes dryness of the skin, due probably to a sort of cutaneous nerve-paralysis. By the lessened exhalation of vapour from the skin under these conditions, loss of heat may be checked and the temperature raised. This increase of heat is not generated by the alcohol, which invariably reduces temperature, but is due to the shut- ting up within the body of the heat generated by the oxidation of food, together with various noxious elements which under natui^al conditions are thrown off by skin radiation. The effect of § 40. The last and most important physiological con- the°nervous sideration in the study of alcohol is that of its effect on system. the nervous system. The innumerable strands of the grayish (in essence unknown) substance which pervade the tissues everywhere, and which in their totality form the nervous system, are more delicate, and their soundness of even more importance to health and life, than is the soundness of the tissues ; or, more exactly speaking, the nerves are of the fii-st import- ance, because it is first through them that the tissues are operated upon. The nervous system is the immediate agency of the life-principle, protecting, guiding, and controlling the varioiis life manifestations. It has been observed that the nerves do not all have the same general functions, and they have therefore been classed in two large divisions : — Physiology 1. The Gerehro-spinal, including the brain and spinal vouB^system. cord, with the nerves proceeding from them. Their fibres are chiefly, though not exclusively, distributed through the skin and the other sensory organs, and through the voluntary muscles. 2. The Sympathetic division, which consists of, firstly, a double chain of ganglia and fibres extending in front of the whole spinal column, and from which proceed branches to the cerebro-spinal nerves. Secondly, various ganglia, PHYSIOLOGICAL RESULTS. 99 plexuses, and nerve fibres, extending branches to the thoi-acic and abdominal viscera. And, iJiirdly, a series of nerves controlling the blood-vessels, and known as the vaso-motor nerves, and which are connected with both the cerebro-spinal and sympathetic systems. The intertwining and union of these systems of nerves, the mutual interdependence between them and the vascular system, the indissoluble union of mind and body, all com- bine to constitute the great difficulty in the way of dealing clearly with this part of the subject, since for the sake of clearness we are constantly compelled to distinguish be- tween the interlacing psychological and physiological facts. In the Influence of Exercise on Health, contributed to Dr. .Tames the Booh of Health (London, 1883) by Dr. James Cantile, [jf^^^^r^te he says, "The voluntary muscles are under the direction and functions and regulation of the cerebro-spinal system. This consists Nous's "Btem of the hrain, resident in the cranium or brain-case, and the prolongation from it that goes down the spine under the name of ' pith,' or spinal cord. From the brain and spinal cord NERVES pass to the muscles, carrying the impulse to the muscles ; they are called motor nerves. A nerve on reaching a muscle breaks up into fine filaments, and supplies every part of the muscle. It is by the medium of the nerves that the will acts on the muscles ; the impulse gene- rated in the brain, flies down the spinal cord and along the nerves to a muscle. " The nerves are like telegraph-wires laid on between station and station ; the originating battery, the brain, sends an impulse along the wires, the nerves, to work a machine at the other end, the muscle. But just as it is possible to send opposite electric currents along one wire, so in a nerve we have opposite currents. The one we have just spoken of is a downward current, from the brain to the muscles ; but there is also an upward current carrying messages from the skin and muscles to the brain ; these nerves are called sensory nerves, or nerves of sensation, because they carry the impressions of our sensation to the brain, where the knowledge gained from them is converted into motion, or stored up as memory, etc., for future use. The two sets of impulse are conveyed along separate fibres that are firmly bound together ; but close to the spinal cord the fibres separate, and we see a motor and sensory bundle. 100 . THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. " The involuntary muscles of the bodj are under the regulation of a separate system of nerves, which, as it presides over the organs of the more animal or vegetative part of our existence, is called the vegetative system. This consists of a double chain of small nervous masses called ganglia united together by nerves. The chains are arranged on either side of the spine. From the ganglia, nerves pass to the heart, lungs, and the organs of the alimentary canal, liver, pancreas, etc. — in fact, to all the abdominal and thoracic viscera. On account of the ready disturbance of all parts of this system, when any one part is excited, it is called the sympatJietic system. " Hence we find we have two sets of muscles presided over in the main by two sets of nerves : the voluntary muscles by the cerebro-spinal system, and the involuntary by the sympathetic. The chief diif erence between the two sets is that one, the sympathetic system, acting on the heart, lungs, and digestive system, continues in action from the birth to the death of the individual, knowing neither rest nor stoppage, as we understand rest ; whilst the other, the cerebro-spinal system presiding over the voluntary muscles, requires long intervals of quietude provided for by sleep." Parallel -^^ i^ is first through the action on nerves that the effects of tissues are reached, it is plain that the affection of the the nervous nerves is of prior importance to that of the tissues, though tiss™'^*'^'*^*'^ it is also true that the effects conveyed through the nerves to the tissxies recoil on the nerves ; for, like the rest of the body, the nervous system goes through the processes of decomposition and renovation, and therefore is dependent for its effectiveness on food ; and as alcohol interferes with the digestion and degrades and deteriorates the whole process of nutrition, it follows that it harms the nervous system, and hence the conclusion that, as alcohol ruins the body, so it ruins the mind. Indeed, we trace alcoholic effects on the nerves parallel with those on the muscular tissues ; such as degeneration of the nerve-tissue, the bursting of blood-vessels, and flooding the brain with blood, etc. As to the effects of alcohol on the nervous system, except in the grosser manifestations — those of " jollity " and drunkenness — there is little unanimity of opinion among PHYSIOLOGICAL RESULTS. 101 experts, and as yet their research has covered but a cora- parativelj small portion of the whole field. It has long been a disputed point whether the peculiar sensations conveyed by the brain after the ingestion of alcohol are the result of reflex action, * or of direct action on the nervous system. It seems to be settled now, what- The first ever the subsequent reflex action may be, that the first action action of ' . •/ ' alconol oTi of alcohol on the brain is made direct through the blood. the brain is Dr. Baer (op. cit.) says, "Experiments on brute and ^'^^g^g^^^ man teach that in a comparatively short time after its this point, injection, subcutaneously or into the food channels, alcohol disappeai-s from its place of introduction, being taken into the blood." And he proves that the primary act of alcohol in the system is its entering the blood, by the established fact that drunkenness is produced more rapidly through the direct injection in the blood than by its introduction into the body through any other channel. It seems, therefore, probable that some portion of the Possible alcohol, the moment it enters the mouth, is drawn into the'rlddie'' the blood, which hies direct to the brain with it. "^^y alcohol. In this, it seems to me, may be found the solution of one rapidly, in- of the hitherto most puzzling riddles of the alcohol question, to^'cates ipss V ■ 1 • T • ^ •!! a*^" more VIZ., why a man who sips his drink gets more quickly siowiythan drunk than he who gulps it down almost at once. For, if Jny°a1[en,"' it were — as most authorities claim that it is — only by by sipping. reflex action that alcohol operates on the system, then, obviously, an ordinary dose, swallowed almost at once, would more quickly intoxicate than would the same dose slowly sipped. * " By reflex action is meant the power which nerve-centres possess of receiving and perceiving an impression brought to them by a nerve from some part, and, as the result, of transmitting an impression through another nerve to some other, it may be distant, part. Thus an impulse conducted by nerves from without inward, reaches a centre, and by that centre, as the result, an impulse is sent through other nerves which conduct it from within outward. So, it is said, an impression or impulse is reflected by a nerve-centre. If, for a famiUar instance, the skin be pricked, the part is suddenly withdrawn. An impression is conveyed from the spot injured through a nerve to a nerve-centre, and hence another impression is sent by the centre through another nerve to muscle, which then contracts and moves the part away." — W. S. Savory, surgeon to St. Bartholo- mew's Hospital, in his introductory chapter in the Book of Health (London, 1883). 102 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. If we remember the processes — that the saliva, on alcohol's entrance into the mouth, instantly dilutes it with water (and, for all that we know, in other ways minimizes the harmful effect before it enters the stomach) ; that in the stomach all of the alcohol — except the very small portion of it that goes out with the refuse — is farther diluted, as far as is practicable, by the gastric juice, in order to still further lessen its evil power before it enters the blood ; — when we bear all this in mind, it will be seen that in the case of the alcohol being slowly sipped, time would be given to all these defensive functions to act in the completest manner of which the body is capable, and thus the resulting intoxication would be much slighter than in the case of alcohol being speedily swallowed. But directly the reverse is usually the case. Why ? In the first place, during sipping, the vapour of the alcohol is inhaled, and thus instantly taken by the lungs into the blood and thence to the brain. (It is well known that workmen in spirit vaults are intoxicated by inhalation of the spirituous vapours alone.) Secondly, there seems no doubt that sipped wine is usually held in the mouth long enough for some small portion to be drawn directly into the blood from the mouth and thence also to the brain, and, hence, he who slowly sips his alcohol gets more quickly intoxicated than he who, by swallowing it rapidly, subjects it to the more manifold digestive processes, thereby re- tarding the directness and reducing the force of its assault on the brain. The action of alcohol on nerves has been a hotly dis- puted question, and much confusion, largely due to the lack of clear and accepted definitions, still exists on this point. Nerve affectants are generally divided into two groups — stimulants and narcotics. The difficulty in properly defining these groups is similar to that I experienced in defining foods, because in neither case does there exist authoritative definitions. It is most unfortunate that science has not yet reached that height of accuracy which would furnish us with authoritative general definitions, because just as much as in our verbal communications it is necessary to have an accepted authoritative meaning for every word in order PHYSIOLOGICAL RESULTS. 103 that a common understanding' may be arrived at bj all who use it; just as necessary is strictness in definitions of technical terms and phrases. Confusion in terms springs from and produces confusion in thought, and as regards alcohol this confusion will continue as long as strict defini- tions of, for example, such terms as food, poison, stimulant, narcotic, moderate, temperate, large, excessive, use, abuse, etc., are lacking. As to stimulants, for example, in his Principles of various con- Medicine (London, 1841) Dr. Archibald Billing says — flictingdefi- " Tonics give strength, stimulants call it forth. Stimulants stimulants excite action, but action is not strength. On the contrary, ^"^^"s'^'^bI^i"^ over-action increases exhaustion." ling, Forbes, Sir John Foi'bes wrote an essay of great merit on The ^^w*^' Character of Stimulants (London, 1848), in which he says — Chambers, " The healthy fabric should be quite capable of main- B°unton. taining itself in vigour upon a proper diet, and with a due quantum of sleep and exercise, without any adventitious assistance. But if not, assistance should be sought from alteratives rather than from stimulants, which may produce a temporary excitement, but which tend to destroy the balance of the whole. The very nature of the stimulant is fco produce a subsequent depression, and to lose its force by frequent repetition. The depression is proportional to the temporary excitement, and the loss is thus at least equivalent to the gain." But, taking a great authority in Materia 3fedica, Dr. Headland, we find narcotics defined to mean the same as Dr. Forbes means by stimulants. Dr. Headland says — " Narcotics are medicines which pass from the blood to the nerves and nerve-centres, and act so as first to exalt nervous force and then to depress it." In his Clinical Lectures (London, 186.5) Dr. T. King Chambers says, " What is a stimulant ? It is usually held to be something which spurs on an animal to a more vigorous performance of its duties. It seems doubtful if on the healthy nervous system this is ever the effect of alcohol, even in the most moderate doses and for the shortest periods of time." Again taking one of the latest medical opinions, that of Dr. T. Lauder Brunton (op. cit.), we find the following definitions : — 104 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH, " By stimulants we mean those things whicli seem to increase our vital powers for the time being, and thus to give us feelings of greater strength or comfort. By nar- cotics we mean such substances as lessen our relationship "with the external world. When used to a slight extent, narcotics simply afford pleasure by lessening the restraining or depressing effect which external circumstances exert upon the individual. Small quantities thus allow freer play to fancy. But in large quantities they abolish all the mental faculties, and render the person who has taken them completely torpid and incapable of voluntary thought or action. Their abuse may lead not only to individual but to national disaster. The most important stimulants are alcohol in its various forms, tea, coffee, and cocoa. The most important narcotics are alcohol, tobacco, opium, chloral, and Indian hemp." According to Dr. Brunton, therefore, stimulants are so only in seeming, their manifestations are spurious. On the other hand, narcotics are so only in a physical sense, as in the mental sense they are liberators of the mind ; i.e., mental stimulants, when moderately indulged, becoming anaesthetics vs^hen taken in excess. According to him, alcohol in moderate quantities is a stimulant — that is, a giver of spurious strength; and in large quantities a narcotic — that is, a duller of the senses to impressions from the external world. Dr.Brunton's Apparently for the purpose of fortifying this peculiar feiiie^ofhTs position. Dr. Brunton (op. cit.), after stating that "a positiou. very large quantity of spirits taken at a draught " will produce " great depression, or perhaps even stoppage of the heart's beats," assumes that " the impression made is transmitted by the sensory nerves of the stomach up to a nerve-centre, known as the medulla oblongata, at the upper end of the spinal cord, and tlience down by the so-called inhibitory, or restraining nerves, to the heart. When taken in smaller quantities, however, the effect is quite different ; the impression it makes on the stomach is transmitted to the medulla oblongata by the sensory nerves, but instead of being sent down the inhibitory nerves, it is transmitted by the stimulating nerves of the heart, and thus increases the rapidity and strength of its pulsations." PHYSIOLOGICAL RESULTS. 105 Retaining the division of nerve- affectants into Stimu- Definition of lants and Narcotics, I will define stimulant to mean such l^-^^'^'f^tg food, medicine, or exercise as would in itself be energizing, invigorators and will divide stimulants, according to their effects on g"i.^tor8" man, into two classes — Invigorators and Prostrators. Bodily exercise, for instance, ranks among stimulants ; whether it acts as an invigorator or prostrator being dependent upon the kind and degree of the exercise and the condition of the body. Narcotics, on the contrary, are poisons, of a paralyzing Definition nature, and may be divided into two classes ; plain narcotics, „? narcotic" or those whose paralyzing effect is patent, and pseudo- stimulants, or those narcotics whose benumbing effects assume the guise of temporary stimulation, inasmuch as their action is expended primarily upon the inhibitory centres. Hence among narcotics are found alcohol, chloroform, opium, hemp, betel, tobacco, coca, thorn-apple, henbane, etc. Most of these narcotics are, in small doses, pseudo- stimulants, and in large doses, plain narcotics. Alcohol is pre-eminently of this double character ; a pseudo-stimu- lant when taken in small doses, and a plain narcotic when heavily imbibed. With the small — the pseudo-stimulant— dose of alcohol, Meaning of there is tempoi'arily all the appearance of heightened ^^'^ 'J?''™ •• 1 T Tn p 11 1 pseudo- activity, but the life-forces expend themselves to no pur- stimulant, pose — or to a purpose which should not have existed, the ampie^" necessity to dispose of the intruder. The paralyzing effect of alcohol on the nerves may be compared to the effect produced on the machinery of a clock, by a gradual redaction of the weight of its pendulum ; the machinery runs faster and faster, but this activity is valueless — the real principle, the time-keeping faculty, is paralyzed. Thus the animated appearance, the throbbing of the arteries, the peculiar sparkle in the eye, the flush of the face, and the activity manifested by the drinker are signs of danger.* The extra activity is caused by the systematic * The angry man shows the same signs — the flaming eye, tnrgid vein, etc., that, in the case of alcohol-drinking, are claimed as signs of benefit. In both cases, however, the appearances are the results of resentment. The angry man is calling on his reserve force for 106 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Alcohol clearly a narcotic poison. effort to avert harm, and originates in the incipient paralysis of the nerves caused by alcohol. In fact, such signs, "when they result fi"om the ingestion of alcohol, are no more signs of healthy action than the downhill velocity of a coach, when the drag is taken off its wheel, is an evidence of safe progress. As deceptive as the outward manifestations are the inward sensations of ease, pleasure, and comfort resulting from the drinking of alcohol. They are all signs of paralysis. The starving man, after the acute pangs of hunger have reached the point where paralysis from inanition attacks the nerves, experiences the most agreeable sensa- tions, and sees the most delicious banquets set before him. Similar is the result in the case of death by freezing ; when the cold has paralyzed the nerves of sensation, happy visions of shelter and warmth lull the sufferer into the fatal sleep. A like incipient paralysis of the nerves furnishes the pleasing sensations resulting from the use of alcohol. Alcohol is therefore clearly a narcotic poison, though this fact has long been a matter of dispute. In his well- known Essay on Drunlcenness (London, 1804), Dr. Thomas Trotter says on this point, "As an article in Materia Iledica, physicians have referred alkohol to the class of narcotics ; medicines which induce stupor and sleep, among which are reckoned opium, banque, cicuta, belladonna, hyociamus nicotiana, lauro-cerefus, etc. The operation of narcotics has lately given birth to much controversy in medical writing, the one party contending for a primary- sedative power in these medicines, which by suspending sense and motion" produce "that condition of the body called sleep. On the other hand, it is argued that the first effects of narcotics are stimulant, and that sleep " follows " as a consequence of preceding excitement ; they are therefore Prof christi- *^ ^^ Considered as only indirectly sedatives." One of Bon.Dr.Figg, the highest authorities on poison. Prof. Christison, affirms Anstie on that " alcohol Constitutes a powerful narcotic poison." subduing or punishing the external offender ; the alcohol-dosed system is collecting its reserve force to conquer and expel the internal foe. PHYSIOLOGICAL RESULTS. 107 Dr. E. G. Figg {op. cit., 1862) says the same ; and Dr. Anstie, in liis Stimulants and Narcotics (London, 1864), denies even tlie temporary strengthening of the body from alcohol, and arrives at " one distinct conclusion — which appears to be very great — namely, that as in the case of chloroform and ether, the symptoms which are commonly described as an evidence of excitement, depending upon the stimulation of the nervous system preliminary to the recurrence of narcosis, are in reality an essential of the narcotic ; i.e., the paralytic influence." Dr. James Edmunds (op. cit.) says, " Supposing that Dr. James we were able by the use of alcohol to elicit latent S*!™""!^*"^ «/ , ^ tae same. strength, and, as it were, carry a patient round the corner, i.e., through the crisis, when he might recover himself and go on safely — why, if that were so, the influence of alcohol would be invaluable in exhausting diseases, for it would often enable us to save life. But alcohol is never a stimulant at all when we come to examine it. It never acts as anything but a paralyzer. What are the reasons from which it has been argued that alcohol in small doses is a stimulant, instead of a narcotic, as it is in full doses ? These — that while in the one the brain is paralyzed, in the other the man will talk faster; that while in the one the man's heart is paralyzed and his vessels distended, in the other the man's heart acts more vigorously, and his pulse beats more strongly. And it is inferred that because his heart beats more strongly, and the blood-vessels seem to be more active, the circulation must go on more actively, and that in cases of fainting and in cases of accident the circulation will often be kept up where otherwise it would fail. Let me ask if there is not a more probable explanation of the force with which the heart acts under the influence of a small dose of alcohol than that of supposing that the influence is in one case that of a narcotic, in the other that of a. stimulant. " We have an analogy in the act of breathing. When we see a man breathing quietly we know that he is com- fortable, but when we see a man with asthma, we know that the air cannot get into his chest, nor its circulation go on aright in his lungs. What do we see ? We see him breathing with most wonderful ' vigour,' let us call it. Is that any better for the man ? Is that any indication 108 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. that lie has got more air ? No physiologist would for a moment suggest that it was. He would say that the terrible breathing we see where an asthmatic patient leans out of window and strains all his breathing muscles to gasp for air, was an indication he could not get air into him, instead of an indication that he got more air. Yet that is a precisely analogous illustration, and the parallel will hold if we analyze by every scientific and physiological test. For instance, if the aeration of the blood be ob- structed in the capillaries of the lungs, the breathing becomes more frequent and more vigorous ; but this accele- rated action is always called ' difficult breathing,' and is evidence that the true respiratory changes are obstructed instead of being promoted. If the obstruction continue, this difficult or accelerated breathing rapidly exhausts the patient ; the effort cannot be maintained very long, and death necessarily follows. " If in a healthy animal we leave the heart and lungs intact, and the blood-vessels unobstructed, and simply close the windpipe with a ligature, violent efforts are made to inspire ; but as no fresh air reaches the lung-cells, the necessary exchanges between the blood and air cannot be made, the blood ceases to pass on through the otherwise unobstructed capillaries, the arteries behind get gorged, the heart makes a few violent struggles to force on the blood, but the circulation becomes arrested all through the body, and death ensues. " Here, in the phenomena of asphyxia, we see that the mere non-completion of the proper exchanges between the blood and the air absolutely arrests the blood-currents, while all the circulatory organs remain perfect, and the heart strains every fibre to urge on the life-stream. If instead of at once suffocating the animal, we allow it to breathe air containing its full proportion of oxygen, but containing also ten per cent, of carbonic-acid gas, we get, first, a retardation of narcosis of the respiratory actions in the lungs, like that which alcohol, when mixed with healthy blood, produces in the tissues of the body. Breathing becomes quickened, as in persons suffering from any other impediment to respiration, and the heart acts violently and rapidly ; but as the carbonic-acid gas is carried by the blood all over the body, narcosis overtakes PHYSIOLOGICAL RESULTS. 109 the brain and voluntary muscles, then the involuntary breathing muscles, and lastly the heart itself. Under these circumstances death is caused by a gradual asphyxia, so precisely like that caused by extreme drunkenness that nothing but the actual presence of alcohol in the body would enable the physician to tell one from, the other. But until the narcosis has extended equally to every part of the body, we get effects like those primary effects of alcohol which are called ' stimulating ; ' i.e., we get violent and rapid pulsation of the heart, etc., etc. Yet carbonic- acid gas is the most perfect type of a narcotic poison, and it kills the deity of the fire-worshippers as remorselessly as it poisons every animal tissue."* In a subsequent paper on the Physiological Influence of Alcohol (1874) Dr. Edmunds again sums up the narcotic effects of alcohol in these words : " The so-called stimu- lating effects of alcohol are really only finer shades of that same narcotic influence which produces general stupefac- tion and universal paralysis when the agent is given in large doses." The narcotizing action of alcohol is twofold, i.e., direct The twofold and reflex. Its direct action is that of its direct assault on a^t\on*'of°^ the brain, whose highest functions it attacks with most aicoboi oa severity, because the higher the function the more delicate and nen°es. and sensitive, and hence more susceptible to injury, is the brain-matter involved. Its I'eflex action is to paralyze the telegraphic nerve-apparatus by which the dazed and dulled superior brain sends its orders for the expulsion of the enemy. Hence the moral and spiritual functions — those of reverence for God, of aspiration ; the principles of self- abnegation — modesty, love, patience, and fortitude, are the first victims of alcohol, while the coarser powers of the brain are at first comparatively little affected, and hence the orders for the reduction of the enemy devolve on these inferior functionaries instead of being received from the highest. It is well known that — in the case of contending illustration OQ this point. * This is from an nnrevised newspaper report of what Dr. Edmunds then said — which accounts for the careless diction. The facts and opinions stated are, however, so clear and important that I have reproduced it here. 110 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. armies — no matter how superior in every respect the one foe may be to the other, and no matter how certain the ultimate result of the engagement may be, if, at the very outset, the inferior force should succeed in disabling both from action and command the chief of the superior force and those next in power and in knowledge of his plans, many lives will be uselessly wasted, because the lower officers, ignorant of the plan of battle and not holding that supremacy over the men which the general possessed, issue contradictory and inadequate orders, resulting in a confusion which costs heavily before the chief can resume his powers and lead to victory. Similar, tliough infinitely more complex, are the paralyzing effects of alcohol on man. Under these the highest functions of the brain send muddled or no orders to the sub-functions, and they in their turn (the extent of the confusion, of course, being largely determined by the amount of alcohol ingested, and the health, conditions, temperament, and intrinsic character of the drinker) send stupid or no messages to their subordinates, and so on. But the lower the grade of a faculty, the coarser are the nerve-molecules and therefore the less susceptible of paralysis, but also the less qualified are such faculties — as in the case of the army deprived of its leaders — either to conceive or carry out the work of the highest functions ; and hence in the body of man, as in the demoralized army, we find dire confusion perverting or destroying orders passed from higher to lower nerve- centres, and from nerves to tissues — and, as a result, the various manifestations of naental and physical disorders which are termed lack of co-ordination of ideas, lack of co-ordination of muscles, systemic demoralization, the wreck of manhood. Destruction ^^® co-ordinating powers of voluntary action are the of the powers next to yield after the moral ; the mechanical powers tion?"'^ '°*' yield last. For instance, if we put something in a drunken man's hand, if he be not too far gone, he will clutch it firmly, though without interest, idea, or intent — the action of his hand being entirely mechanical ; as is also the clinging of his legs to the saddle and the sides of the horse if he is put on horseback. His body sways about PHYSIOLOGICAL RESULTS. Ill helplessly, but the involuntary muscles of Ms legs, called into action by tlie touch, cling to what touches them. The further alcoholic paralysis extends, the less does the victim know of shocks or pains. It is commonly known that a drunken man can fall a considerable distance and experience, in appearance at least, comparatively small damage. About three years ago a di-unkeu man jumped from London Bridge into the Thames. He was picked up by a sailor, taken to a hospital, and in a few days showed no effects of the shock. It is also a fact of common observation that drunken persons can go about with ugly gashes and bruises on their bodies, without seeming in the least aware of these injuries ; and in the case of the hunter St. Martin, it was seen what a horrible condition could be produced in the stomach by alcohol, with comparatively no sensations of inconvenience to the patient. It is the same kind of paralysis which — when the vaso- motor nerves under its effects partially lose their con- tracting influence on the capillaries at the same time that the heart puts on extra force to expel the foe — makes the capillaries dilate so that the blood rushes into and partly remains in these minute blood-vessels. This state of things suffuses the skin with a glow, and thus heat is no doubt wasted. Prof. John Fiske, of Cambridge, Mass., U.S., in a keen Prof. John controversial essay on Tobacco and AlcoJiol (Boston, 1869), F'®?^^ ''" ., -^ 11111 incipient says ot the nerve symjjtoms produced by alcohol — alcoholic " The first narcotic symptom produced by alcohol is a P*'^'*'^*'^- symptom of incipient paralysis ; the flushing of the face is caused by the paralysis of the cervical branch of the sympathetic. This symptom usually occurs some time before the conspicuous manifestation of the ordinary signs of intoxication, which result from paralysis of the cerebrum ; we may search in vain among the phenomena of intoxica- tion for any genuine evidences of that heightened mental activity which is said to be followed by a depressive recoil. There is no recoil, there is no stimulation. There is nothing but pai^alytic disorder from the moment narcosis begins. From the outset the whole nervous system is lowered in tone, the even course of nutrition disturbed, and the rhythmic discharge of its functions interfered with." 112 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Out-ide Still it would seem that, at least in cases of small temperature doses, the dilation of capillaries is only in part the result qulamesthe of vaso-motor nerve paralysis, which would seem to be dilation of largely influenced by surrounding temperature. In large laiies. doses, no doubt, alcohol has such a paralyzing effect on the vaso-motor nerves that the capillaries are dilated almost the same in cold as in heat ; hence the danger of freezing to death. But in small doses this is not the case, because even though the drinker does not in a warm room feel the effects of drink, he becomes quickly intoxicated after entering the cold air, which seems to point the fact that in a warm room the system risks less from driving the alcoholized blood to the surface for oxidation, than from keeping it back in the interior ; while in the cold atmosphere it is safer to let the poison work through the interior of the system. And therefore we see, as in the case of the outward manifestations — the glow of the eye, etc. — the agreeable sensations caused by the blood pouring to the surface are deceptive ; it is not an increase, but a decrease of heat, the surface being warmed at the expense of the interior. And universal practical experience proves the fact. It would seem, however, to have been demonstrated that the minutest quantities of alcohol have some paralyzing effect on the vaso-motor nerves. The Rev. Mr. Merriman, of Worcester, Mass., U.S., in a most excellent essay, entitled A Sober View of Absti- nence (Medical Temperance Journal, London, 1882), says — Drs Nicoi " -^^'^- ^i<^ol and Mossop of Edinburgh, conducting a Mossop, and series of experiments upon each other, examined the base narcotic" ' ^ of the eye by means of the ophthalmoscope while the system effects on the was Under the influence of various drugs. They found that the nerves controlling the delicate blood-vessels of the retina were paralyzed, and the vessels themselves con- gested, by a dose of two drachms of rectified spirits — less than a quarter of an ounce of absolute alcohol— or about a table-spoonful of brandy. Here was a genuine paralysis, 'a real physical damage to the nervous tissue.' The nar- cosis caused by this minute dose was, of course, less extended, but just as real as that which occurs when a man becomes dead-drunk. " As the nerves and blood-vessels of the eye have a PHYSIOLOGICAL RESULTS. 113 peculiarly intimate connection with the brain, this experi- ment would seem to show ns through this little window, as it were, to the cerebrum, how it is that even half a glass of light wine ' goes to the head ' of many people, that is, causes for a moment a slight dizziness and blurring of sight ; and also how it is that, as Dr. E. Smith has shown, all the senses, particularly the sight, are blunted by very small doses of alcohol. Is it impertinent to suggest that even smaller quantities than this quarter of an ounce may cause incipient narcosis, if only we had an instru- ment sharp enough to detect it ? If so, the distinction in kind between the effects of large and of smaU doses, vanishes." The quality of the brain decides the clearness and The quality rapidity with which a message for any part of the body is decMes'th'e" conceived. The soundness of the various nerves through quality of its which the message is transmitted decides the accuracy and eating""'' speed with which it will reach its destination ; and the power. relative health of the communicating agent, and of the tissue deputed by it to put the order into execution, decides the degree of perfection with which the transaction will be finished. Dr. J. Crichton Browne, in his paper on Education and Dr. j. Cnch- the Nervous System (Book of Health, London, 1883), says: ^^^"S^^o^t. " The rate at which a nervous impulse travels along a nerve to a muscle can be accurately measured, and this has been found to vary much in different animals. In a frog, such an impulse travels at the rate of twenty-eight metres per second, and in a man at the rate of thirty-three metres per second. And in different individual men the rate of nerve conduction varies slightly. But it is in more complex nervous operations that the influence of quality of nerve-matter in determining rate of action becomes more manifest. Thus, as regards sensory impressions and voluntary actions founded upon them, the observations of astronomers show that of a number of persons intently watching for the transit of a star across the meridian, some will record the event a third or even half a second earlier than others, the difference between individuals in this respect being known as the personal equation. M. Hirsh has shown that there are differences in the 114 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. rapidity with which impressions are transmitted through the nerves of sight, hearing, and touch, and common observation affords abundant illustrations of different rates of action in nerve-centres connected with mental processes. If a man, when out walking, asks his way, and receives some rather complicated directions as to the route to be taken, he will frequently repeat these directions aloud once or twice before he fully comprehends them. The words have been instantaneously received and appropriated so as to be capable of reproduction, but the interpretation of them takes appreciable time. The lower process has been rapid, the higher has been more deliberately per- formed. And common observation also affords abundant illustration of different rates of rapidity of mental pro- cesses in different persons, and thus guides to a rough estimate of the quality of brain-matter. One man is spoken of as quick-witted ; another, as slow of thought. One is said to be vivacious, another lethargic ; and for scientific purposes differences of this kind are summoned (?) up in temperaments, in which rapidity of mental action and quality of brain-substance are indicated by certain out- ward characteristics. From the nervous to the lymphatic temperament, through the sanguine and bilious and inter- mediate temperaments, compounded of these, there is a gradual diminution in the rate of nerve-action, and in the fineness of quality of nerve-substance." The manner in which alcohol — even when taken in very minute quantity — interferes with the healthfulness of nerve-communication, is another proof that it is always narcotic, i.e., a nerve-paralyzer. TheiatfiDr. Dr. E. A. Parkes, in the Manual of Practical Hygiene S-dtothe (London, 1878), gives the following description of the iiaraiyzirif; nervc-paralvzing effects of alcohol : — effectofalco- t, t i. i i i j. j. ,, ,• hoi on the J-H most persons alcohol acts at once as an anaesthetic, transmuun ^^^ lessens also the rapidity of impressions, the power of thought. thought, and the perfection of the senses. In other cases it seems to cause increased rapidity of thought, and excites imagination, but even here the power of control over a train of thought is lessened." t'heS^'*°" In a lecture on Physiological Aspects of the Alcohol Question, to the conference of Liverpool teachers con- PHYSIOLOGICAL RESULTS. 115 vened by the National Temperance League, June 9, 1883, Dr. Howie said, " In the present day we can calculate with precision the exact time, to a minute fraction of a second, which is required to transmit a message from the brain to the hand or any other portion of the body, and it has been distinctly shown that it takes much longer to send such a message after the person experimented upon has taken even a small dose of a narcotic. A message which could be sent in 0"1904 of a second required 0'29 70 seconds for its performance after two glasses of hock had been administered to the subject of experiment, thus showing how much even a slight narcotic effect interferes with the vital action of nervous tissue." How instantaneous is the disorganizing and crippling r)r. J. i. effect of this nerve-paralysis upon the mental powers, after teresUnsj ex- even the smallest dose of alcohol, is shown by Dr. J. J. periments Ridge, in his interesting experiments, the results of which, doses of published in the Medical Temperance Journal for April, alcohol. 1882, are almost entirely reproduced here : " If alcohol is at first a stimulant, of course the functions under con- sideration should be more easily and accurately performed. There are three of the functions of the nervous system which seemed most suitable for test purposes. These are (1) the sense of touch, or feeling ; (2) the sense of weight, or the muscular sense ; and (3) the sense of sight, or vision. I have tested each of these senses in the following ways : — " 1. Feeling. — An instrument was constructed in which were two points in an upright position, and about half an inch apart. A third upright point was situated between the two, and was capable of being moved in a straight line nearer to one or other of the stationary points. These three points were covered in so as to be invisible, but the forefinger could be passed through a hole in order to feel them. The middle point was moved by a rack and pinion, and the person tested was requii-ed to move it until, in his opinion, it was as nearly as possible equally distant from the two outside points. The movement of the middle point was recorded on a dial invisible to the subject of the experiment. This form of instrument was preferred to the ordinary sesthesiometer, because in that instrument (in using which the person has to state the earliest moment 116 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. that lie can distinguish the points of a pair of compasses as two, while they are gradually separated) imagination might more easily vitiate the conclusions. FEELING. i Number of degrees §, Number of degrees Amount s on the dial ? on the dial eS of absolute Xi from exact centre From exact centre alcohol I be/ore alcohol. ^ after alcohol. < given. A 6 6 3 5 10 8 10 9-3 2 drachms A 6 30 4 30 10 16 20 24 46 45 5 28 2 drachms A 8 40 1 9 — 16 33 24 7 30 — 23-5 2 drachms A 3 3 1 14 14 2 drachms A 75 75 1115 1 115 2 drachms 115 189-8 " This table shows that alcohol in small doses exercises a narcotic influence on the nerves of sensation, or renders the perception of minute differences of size less keen and delicate. The numbers, though apparently large, do not represent a large actual distance between the points. They simply indicate the relative difference, the average before alcohol being twenty-three, and afterwards almost thirty-eight. The only conclusion that can safely be drawn is that there is certainly no improvement, no increased sensitiveness after small quantities of alcohol, but, on the contrary, slight deterioration. " 2. Weight. — The amount of muscular force required to overcome different resistances is measured by a special sense connected with the muscles, but exercised by the nerves. Comparison between two weights requires the action of the judgment. The more acute the perceptive faculties are, so much the more readily will the judgment decide upon small differences between two weights. The effect of alcohol on this muscular sense was determined by an arrangement in which a weight was attached to a certain lever, and the person experimented upon was required to slide an equal weight along another lever, exactly similar to the fii'st, until, in his opinion, the weights appeared to be the same. It is obvious that the position of the weights on each lever ought to be exactly the same, and, therefore, the more sensitive the muscular sense is, PHYSIOLOGICAL RESULTS. 117 the nearer will the individual be able to place them before he ceases to detect any diii'erence. " The following table gives the particulars of the various trials, the average results both before and after alcohol, the quantity of alcohol administered, and the general average of the whole. All the individuals tested were adult men, and the alcohol was diluted with at least three times its bulk of water. WEIGHT. Distance between 1 Distance between Amount 1 the weights, in the weights, in 1 of absolute •S millimetres, before > 'A millimetres, after fe alcohol I alcohol. alcohol. > •< given. A 14 8 11-00 7 20 1350 i drachm Non-A 22 10 16 18 — 16-50 18 20 20 22 — 20 00 1 drachm A 3 4 2 10 — 4-75 8 4 8 3 — 5 75 1 drachm A 4-5 7 9 1 7 6-90 13 11 12-5 18 13 13 50 2 drachms A 2 9 5 — 4-00 5 4 13 10 — 8 00 2 drachms Non-A 2 4 5 2 — 3-25 10 4 4 6 — 6 00 2 drachms A 2 2 5 — 2-25 1 7 4 3 — 3 75 2 drachms A 5 1 9 — 5-25 10 8 8 — 6 50 2 drachms A 9 1 11 1 4-40 3 8 11 15 4 8 20 2 drachms Non-A 2 3 4 1 2-50 6 6 8 3 5-75 4 drachms 60-60 90.95 General average, 6-060 before; 9-095 after. "From this table certain facts are apparent: — (1) That in every case the average sensibility to weight and power of discrimination was decidedly diminished by small doses of alcohol, the general average indicating that the sensibility is diminished about one-third, or 66"4 per cent. (2) That single trials are not reliable, since many circumstances may unite to produce a fallacious result. Thus, some of the trials after alcohol were actually more accurate than some of those before it, although the average of each individual conforms to the general average of the whole. (3) That non- abstainers are affected, as well as abstainers. (4) That small doses act in a similar way to large doses, and that the difference is only in degree, not in kind. "3. Vision. — This was tested by noting the distance at which a row of letters could be read with one eye, without 118 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. alcohol, and then the distance at which the same letters, differently arranged, could be read with the same eye afterwards. The distance varies very greatly in different individuals ; hut, of course, in the same individual it would remain the same, provided that the alcohol had no effect. Indeed, one might naturally expect a slight improvement in the latter trials, by reason of the eyes becoming accus- tomed to the formation of the fancy letters employed. The following table gives the results obtained : — VISION. Distance of distinct vision, in feet, s Distance of distinct vision, in feet. 2 Amount of absolute alcohol given. ,0 T < before alcohol. > < after alcoliol. > A 7 r-25 7 6 6-81 7 6-75 6-50 5-75 6-50 i drachm Non-A 9 7 7 8-5 7-87 8-75 6-75 5-75 8 7 31 1 drachm A 10-5 10-75 10-5 10-5 10-56 8 9 7-5 9-5 8 50 1 drachm Non-A 425 5-25 5-25 — 4-91 4-50 4-50 4-25 — 4 41 2 drachms A 10-25 9 7-25 — 8-83 9 9-25 8 — 8 75 2 drachms A 11-25 11-25 10-25 9-5 10-56 10-5 10-5 11 8-5 10 12 2 drachms A 15 10-5 13 — 12-80 13 10-5 12 — 11 80 2 drachms A 9-25 10-25 — 9-75 8-50 8 — — 8 25 4 drachms A 6 6 5-75 — 5-91 5-25 4-75 4-75 4 91 4 drachms A 16 15-5 15-75 15-75 14-75 14-5 15-25 14-83 4 drachma 93-75 85-38 General average, 9-375 before ; 8-538 after. " Here, again, it is clear that every one of the in- dividuals experimented on was affected injuriously by the alcohol. On the average, everyone had to approach nearer in order to distinguish the same letters. The general average indicates that it required an approach of nearly one foot to compensate for the injury done by the alcohol. To put it another way, the distance had to be shortened, on the average, 9 per cent. " In testing all three of these senses it ought in fairness to be borne in mind that considerable advantage was given to alcohol by the unavoidable necessity that the test with alcohol should follow the test without it. For thus, in every case, the alcohol gets all the credit of the improve- ment due to experience and practice. If this fallacy could have been avoided, it seems probable that the difference in PHYSIOLOGICAL RESULTS. 119 favour of total abstinence would have been even greater than it really was. " As two drachms of alcohol was the amount given in the majority of cases, it may be just worth a line to indicate that this represents one tablespoonful of spirits ; not quite half a glassful of port or sherry ; a small wine- glassful of claret or champagne ; and not quite a quarter of a pint of ale. Now, these quantities are considerably short of the ' physiological minimum,' which is supposed not to do any one any harm. Indeed, the fact is established — that from the moment when sufficient alcohol has been taken to affect the nervous system at all, to the total extinction of nervous energy by a fatal quantity, there is progressive paralysis of every form of nerve function, capable of accurate determination, which has hitherto been experimented on. " It is to be carefully observed that, notwithstanding this real deterioration of various powers, the individual is not conscious of any alteration, and nothing but an unmis- takable test can convince him that he is not so accurate or capable as he was before. Whether this arises simply from the inability of the judgment to compare the intensity of two impressions reaching it separately, and after an interval of from fifteen to thirty minutes, or whether it arises from incipient paralysis, or weakening of the judgment itself, is not easy to determine. Probably both causes operate to account for the failure to perceive the difference. " One thing becomes very clear — namely, that the highest possible perfection of the nervous system, is only possible with strict total abstinence. " Alcohol has, also, clearly no right to be called a stimulant. It is a narcotic from first to last, as Dr. Wilks and others have heretofore asserted, and the symptoms of stimulation are only the result of the peculiar, balanced condition of many functions, between accelerating and checking nerves ; the narcotizing of a checking nerve producing for the time being the same visible effect as the stimulation of an accelerating nerve. Alcohol, like other drugs, has its special preferences for certain nerve-tracts over others, and there is no doubt that in some persons one nervous function is more susceptible, and in others 120 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Recent testi- mony in con- firmation of Dr. J. J. Ridge's ex- periments. Conditions qualifying length, ex- tent, and character of alcoholic paralysis. Theories re- garding the effects of al- cohol on the nerves in producing the drink- craving. Dr. Anstie on the same. Prof. Fiske on the same. General con- clusions as to anotter. Nevertheless, its tendency may be broadly indicated as a paralyzer of nerve-function, or, more shortly, as a trne narcotic." In a letter dated March 21, 1884, Dr. J. J. Ridge writes to me as follows : " Yery recently Dr. Scougal, of New Mill, has repeated and confirmed my conclusions, and adds that the sense of hearing is similarly affected by alcohol. The health, temperament, alcoholic heritage, and resis- tive power of the drinker ; the state of his stomach as to food; the vitality of the blood, activity of the excrementary organs, foreign ingredients in the alcoholic drink ; — these and other conditions and circumstances combine to deter- mine and qualify the length, extent, and character of alcoholic paralysis, and the amount of damage done, just as they do in regard to the nutritive processes ; and must equally be considered in forming an estimate of the effects of alcohol upon the nervous system. § 41. In the preceding portion, on alcohol and digestion, it has been shown that the terrible drink-craving was caused by the avidity with which alcohol absorbs the water from the tissues, but it does not depend exclusively on those chemical properties of alcohol. One of the peculiarities inherent in all forms of sensuous excitation is that artificial excitement produces a cry for more of the excitant, and the more imperatively in proportion to the delicacy of the functions thus abused. Says Dr. Anstie (op. ciY.), " A certain quantity of nervous tissue has ceased to fill the role of nervous tissue, and there is less impressible matter upon which the narcotic might operate. And hence it is that the confirmed drunkard, opium eater, or coquero requires more and more of his accustomed narcotic to produce the intoxication which he delights in — to saturate his blood to a high degree with the poison, and thus to insure an extensive contact with the nervous matter." Prof. John Fiske {op. cit.) says, " The perpetual craving of the drinker in all probability is due to the gradual alteration in the molecular structure of the nervous system, caused by frequently repeated narcosis." Alcohol, therefore, is a narcotic always — from beginning to end, never anything else but a narcotic. Indeed, were PHYSIOLOGICAL RESULTS. 121 it otherwise, it would not be used in the ways that it is. the narco- Therefore, those who drink in the hope of increasing the of a"icohoL*^ pleasure of living, miss their object, as do those who drink in the hope of augmenting their mental powers. The lawyer, taking his glass before delivering his brief, dulls his anxiety as to the issue and his embarrassment in speaking; the orator, taking his glass as an inspiration, will possibly, by the irritation and jostle of ideas due to narcosis, be able to reproduce from his reserve stores of knowledge some flashy, perhaps eloquent periods, but rarely coherent or deep reasoning ; in neither case do feeling or thought become clearer or keener, but memory and fear are deadened, and a mechanical courage to stolidly get over what cannot be adequately faced, is often temporarily acquired. § 42. Recent years have furnished the strongest proofs and testimony that the notion of alcohol as an auxiliary in brain- work is fallacious. Dr. E. G. Figg (op. cit.) says, "In a person drinking Dr. e.g. to stimulate a natural mental function, we soon witness effects of an alteration of object ; for, experimentally convinced that alcohol when in the insolvency of the cerebral system as a basis, and mental the defective co-operation of the blood, that extraordinary stimulant. exhibition is not attainable, he must rest satisfied with reaching that which was once the normal standard of his powers, but from which he has retrograded in the collapse of frequent excess." In a word, alcohol disappoints and betrays all except those who seek sloth and death for body and mind. In a lecture on The Effects of Alcoholic Liquors upon Health and TFor^•, delivered in Hon. Samuel Morley's warehouse, by Sir Andrew Clark, January 6, 1882, he said, " Every adult man who finds himself after trial — and every man should try — to be a thousand times better without alcohol, should not resume it, because he will work better, he will enjoy more, he will have a longer exemption from disease, he will probably live longer, and certainly he will be better in all the higher relations of life. ... I dare say if a man took a glass of wine, as sometimes people do to overcome nervousness, he might succeed, and indeed I am bound to say that that sort of help alcohol sometimes can give to a man, but it gives it curiously enough at the 122 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. expense of blunting his sensibilities. . . . That is my testimony as to the effect of alcoholic liquors upon health and upon work, namely, that for all purposes of sustained, enduring, fruitful work it is my experience that alcohol does not help but hinders it. ... I am bound to say that for all honest work alcohol never helps a human soul. Never, never ! " Mr. A. Arthur Reade, in his work, Study and Stimulants (London, 1883), composed of one hundred and thirty-two letters and citations from various eminent literary and other brain workers, says in his concluding comments, " From a review of these one hundred and thirty-two testimonies ... I find " that " not one resorts to alcohol for stimulus to thinking, and only two or three defend its use under special circumstances — ' useful at a pinch ' under ' physical or mental exhaustion.' Not one resorts to alcohol for inspiration." I quote from Mr. Reade's volume the following concise and comprehensive testimony (given at Bedford Chapel, July 20th, 1882), by the Rev. Stopford A. Brooke: "It has been said that moderate doses of alcohol stimulate work into greater activity, and make life happier and brighter. My experience since I became a total abstainer has been exactly opposite. I have found myself able to work better. I have a greater command over any powers I possess. I can make use of them when I please. When I call upon them they answer ; and I need not wait for them to be in the humour. It is all the difference betAveen a machine well oiled and one which has something among the wheels which catches and retards the movement at unexpected times. As to the pleasure of life, it has been also increased. I enjoy Nature, books, and men more than I did — and my previous enjoyment of them was not small. Those attacks of depression which come to every man at times who lives too sedentary a life, rarely visit me now, and when depression docs come from any trouble, I can overcome it far more quickly than before. The fact is, alcohol, even in the small quantities I took it, while it did not seem to injure health, injured the fineness of that physical balance which means a state of health in which all the world is pleasant. That is my experience after four months of water- di-inking, and it is all the more striking PHYSIOLOGICAL KESULTS. 123 to me, because for the last four or five years I have been a very moderate drinker. I appeal to the young and the old to try abstinence for the very reasons they now use alcohol — in order to increase their power of work and their enjoyment of life. Let the young make the experiment of "working on water only. Alcohol slowly corrupts and cer- tainly retards the activity of the brain of the greatest number of men. They will be able to do all they have to do more swiftly. This swiftness will leave them leisure, the blessing we want most in this overworked world. And the leisure not being led away by alcohol into idleness, into depression which craves unnatural excitement, into noisy or slothful company, will be more nobly used, and with greater joy in the usage. And the older men, who find it so difiicult to find leisure, and who when they find it cannot enjoy it because they have a number of slight ailments which do not allow them perfect health, or which keep them in over- excitement or over-depression, let them try — though it will need a struggle — whether the total abandonment of alcohol will not lessen all their ailments, and by restoring a better temper to the body — for the body with alcohol in it is like a house with an irritable man in it — enable them not only to work better, but to enjoy their leisure. It is not too much to say that the work of the world would be one-third better done, and more swiftly done, and the enjoyment of life increased by one-half, if no one took a drop of alcohol." § 43. The working classes do mostly believe that alcohol Opinions that increases their capacity for labour. Of course they are ^u°e'^*'tije^' deceived by the general sensations and appearances, and capacity for practical tests have proved the fallacy of their belief. Beddoes*^ ^'^' Dr. Beddoes (in Mygeia, 1802) shows by comparison Dpnders, that drinkers, all other circumstances being equal, could Parke^s, and do less work than non-drinkers. Count Woi- " Alcohol," says Dr. Baer, quoting from Dr. Donders, " is no savings-bank for muscular strength, as, in time, it utterly destroys it." "Brandy, in its action on the nerves," says Baron Liebig, " is like a bill of exchange drawn on the health of the labourer, which for lack of cash to pay it, must be constantly renewed. The workman consumes his principal instead of interest, hence the inevitable bankruptcy of the body." 124 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. But the crucial test for the working classes is found in the resnlts of the experiments of Drs. Parkes and Wollowicz.* From long-protracted comparative experiments, alter- nately with water and with alcohol, on a strong and healthy man, they found by counting the heart's beats on days of water-drinking and days of spirit ingestion, that alcohol greatly increased the heart's action. In summarizing these results they say — " Admitting that each beat of the heart was as strong during the alcoholic period as in the water period (and it was really more powerful), the heart on the last two days of alcohol was doing one-fifth more work. " Adopting the lowest . estimate which has been given of the daily work of the heart, viz., as equal to 122 tons lifted one foot, the heart during the alcoholic period did daily work in excess equal to lifting 158 tons one foot, and in the last two days did extra work to the amount of 24 tons lifted as far. " The period of rest for the heart was shortened, though, perhaps, not to such an extent as would be inferred from the number of beats, for each contraction was sooner over. " The heart on the fifth and sixth days after alcohol was left off, and apparently at the time when the last traces of alcohol were eliminated, showed in the sphygmo- graphic tracings signs of unusual feebleness, and, perhaps in consequence of this, when the brandy quickened the heart, again the tracings showed a more rapid contraction of the ventricles, but less power than in the alcoholic period. The brandy acted, in fact, on the heart, whose nutrition had not been perfectly restored. " It will seem at first sight almost incredible that such an excess of work could be put upon the heart, but it is perfectly credible when all the facts are known. " The heart of an adult man makes, as we see above, 73"57 strokes per minute. This number multiplied by sixty for the hour, and again by twenty-four for the entire day, would give nearly 106,000 as the number of strokes * See Bibliography — Experiments on the Effect of Alcohol on the Human Body. — Experiments on the Action of Red Bordeaux Wtne (Claret) on the Human Body. London, 1870. PHYSIOLOGICAL RESULTS. 125 per day. There is, however, a reduction of stroke, pro- duced by assuming the recumbent position and by sleep, so that for simplicity's sake we may take off the 6000 strokes, and, speaking generally, may put the average at 100,000 in the entire day. With each of these strokes the two ventricles of the heart as they contract lift up into their respective vessels three ounces of blood each ; that is to say, six ounces with the combined stroke, or 600,000 in the twenty-four hours. The equivalent of work rendered by this simple calculation would be 116 foot-tons; and if we estimate the increase of work induced by alcohol, we shall find that four ounces of spirit increase it one-eighth part, and eight ounces one-fourth part." Identical results were reached by these physicians in their experiments with claret. There was the " marked effect on the heart . . . the twenty ounces (of claret), containing almost two fluid ounces of alcohol, were mani- festly too much for the subject ... he felt hot and uncomfortable, was flushed, the face was somewhat con- gested, and he was a little drowsy. . . . Moreover, alcohol then began to appear in the urine. . . . With regard to this healthy man taking any alcohol, we have no hesitation in saying he would be better without it." § 44. To sum up, we see that alcohol is a substance General sum- entirely alien to the body, and incapable of being trans- physiological formed into anything useful to it; that it hinders the results of digestion, wastes the digestive fluids, tends to dissolve and damage the blood, and thus vitiates and retards all the life-processes — its action on the stomach and blood producing structural degeneration throughout the system. As to its effect on the nervous system, we see that it works through the blood directly on the brain and nerves ; that it narcotizes, and that in this narcotizing it espe- cially deadens the feelings of care, responsibility, and discretion, and npon the bodily powers its effects are shown in the failure of the power to co-ordinate compli- cated series of muscles, and in blunting the acuteness of the senses. Its aSinity for water causes thirst for water, which the drinker mistakes for liquor- thirst, his mistake being 126 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH, strengthened by the spasmodic demand of the nervous ganglia for more irritation — hence the body's irresistible craving for drink. These being the effects of alcohol on the whole organism, it follows that no one is or can be strengthened by its use, and that, whether used in modera- tion or excess, it is, speaking from the standpoint of physiology alone, an unmitigated curse to man, and as the poisoner of water — maa's chief source of life — it is the great founder of death. CHAPTER VI. PATHOLOGICAL RESULTS, OR DISEASES CAUSED BY ALCOHOL. § 45. In the previous part I have dealt with the chemical action and reaction between the body and alcohol. In this, the pathological — or disease portion — I shall deal briefly with the disagreeable experiences which Nature forces upon man in her protest against his use of alcohol. The difficulties hitherto encountered are here multiplied and intensified. All the complexities and intricacies, and the apparent contradictions which bewilder and confuse the physiological inquirer, confident the physician with large reinforcements. Even if alcoholic drinks were never adulterated, the exact diagnosing of alcoholic diseases would still be a matter of supreme difficulty. Where, for example, can a non-alcoholic standard be found, and without such an authoritative criterion how can accuracy be hoped for ? But not only is there no criterion to judge from, but unadulterated alcohol is a scarcely known article. But let us renaember that without alcohol there would be no adulterations, while without the adulterations there would still be alcohol. Before considering the subject of alcoholic diseases, let Definition of us agree on definitions of the terms disease and health. disease^and Disease is a self-suggesting word — dis-ease, i.e., dis- beaitii. turbance, dis-order. Health we may define as ease, peace, order. Health, therefore, is that state of individual being in which the body and mind are unanimous about the joy of living. This broad definition of health may almost provoke scorn ; not because it is not true, but because it is absurdly inapplicable to life as we find it ; because being true, then 128 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Dr. Huss, the originator of the term akohotism, and its division into acute and chronic. health is an iinknown blessing, and there is nothing but disease in the world ; a terrible verdict to pronounce on man's misuse of himself and his fellow-beings. Practically, then, health is that state of being in which no part of body or mind offers any palpable, or more than evanescent signs of serious individual disturbance ; disease is the palpable manifestation of disturbance of the regular processes of Hfe. Alcoholismus, or alcoholism, is the name for all diseases in any way found to be due to the use of alcohol. The term was first used by Dr. Magnus Huss, of Stockholm, in his Alcoholismus (1849-1851). He divides alcoholism into two groups : Acute alcoholism and Chronic alcoholism* Acute alcoholism (drunkenness and its immediate con- sequences) is principally of a mental character, and the precursor and preparer of chronic alcoholism (the graver chronic mental disorder) ; but as chronic alcoholism is both of a physical and mental character, I will — in order to connect the physical phenomena as a whole with the mental phenomena as a whole — first deal with the chronic physical phenomena, then with acate alcoholism, and then with the chiefly mental phenomena and diseases. A. Physical Phenomena and Diseases. § 46. " The term chronic alcoholism,''^ says Dr. Huss, " applies to the collective symptoms of a disordered condition of the mental, motor, and sensory functions of the nervous system, these symptoms assuming a chronic form, and without their being immediately connected with any of these (organic) modifications of the central or peripheric portions of the nervous system, which may be detected during life or discovered after death by ocular inspection ; such symptoms, moreover, affecting individuals who have * Dr. James Edmunds says that in chronic alcoholism, " the body is one whose tissues are damaged, to begin with, by the long-continned use of alcohol. The case displays all the phenomena of the sot. With every temporary depression in health, a coinparatively mild chill or a little excess in the habitual use of alcohol suffices to bring on an attack of delirium tremens. This differs from acute alcoholism in that the subject is more prone to prostration and death, though the symptoms are less violent, and that recovery is much slower." PATHOLOGICAL RESULTS. 129 persisted for a considerable length of time in the habit of drinking." Strictly speaking, chronic alcoholism includes all The scope of chronic diseases, physical or mental, coming within the * '^" " '*'"■ scope of either of the following categories : — 1. Disorders occasioned by strain imposed on the system by alcohol. 2. Diseases traceable to general system-degeneration produced by alcohol. 3. Diseases which but for alcoholic system-degeneration might have been averted or resisted. Neither place nor time are here afforded for going into the pathogeny, symptomatology, diagnosis, or nosology of alcoholic diseases, and we shall only quote some of the general utterances of the great authorities on these points, leaving the reader to discover, not what diseases do, but what diseases do not directly or indirectly owe, in part at least, their existence, character, and pi'evalence to alcohol. Prof. Christison, of Edinburgh, in a letter to the Chair- Prof. Christi- man of the Massachusetts State Board of Health, dated general July 26th, 1870, says of intoxication — diseases due " I recognize certain diseases which originate in the aicohoL** " vice of drunkenness alone, which are delirium tremens, cirrhosis of the liver, many cases of Bright's disease of the kidneys, and dipsomania, or insane drunkenness. " Then I recognize many other diseases in regard to which excess in alcoholics acts as a powerful predisposing cause, such as gout, gravel, aneurism, paralysis, apoplexy, epilepsy, cystitis, premature incontinence of mine, ery- sipelas, spreading cellular inflammation, tendency of wounds and sores, to gangrene, inability of the constitution to resist the attacks of the diseases at large. 1 have had a fearful amount of experience of continued fever in our infirmary during many an epidemic, and in all my experience I have only once known an intemperate man of forty and upwards to recover." Prof. Christison also claims that three-fourths, or even four-fifths, of Bright's disease in Scotland is produced by alcohol. In a Treatise on the Continued Fevers of Great Britain p^. MurcW- (London, 1874), Dr. C. Murchison says : — sononcon- " A single act of intoxication may also predispose to fevers. K 180 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. typhus. Iliave known several instances of persons exposed for months to the poison in its most concentrated form, who were not attacked until immediately after a debauch. There is no greater error than to imagine that a liberal allowance of alcoholic stimulants fortifies the system against contagious diseases." Dr. Murchi- In the Croonian Lectures of 1874, to the members of tC!na" ""'^' the Royal College of Physicians, on Functional Diseases dueasesof q/ the LivcT, Dr. Murchison said — " It is the prevalence of beer and spirit drinking, and consequent liver-clogging, which accounts for the wide- spread use and countless forms of patent pills, such as Cockle's, Morison's, Holloway's, and others. These are taken by millions every week, and people find that if they do not take them they become bilious and unwell. They are all of a purgative nature, and by occasionally hurrying unspent material out of the system they give temporary relief to the overwrought liver. The wear and tear of this process must, however, tend to shorten life. " The sallow and unhealthy appearance of the face of the drinker indicates the diseased liver, the most common disease being the so-called cirrhosis or shrinkage of the liver, commonly termed in England the ' gin-drinker's liver.' " Mr. startin ^^ Ji^lj) 1882, Mr. James Startin stated that — o|' skin " Sixty per cent, of the cases of skin disease which he has to deal with are due, in one way or another, to alcohol. His position, both as a consultant and surgeon to St. John's Hospital for Diseases of the Skin, render his experience large and his testimony important. There can be no doubt that the universal abandonment of alcoholic beverages would conduce as much to the health and clearness of the skin among the general population as among those female prison inmates who are declared, on unimjDcachable authority, so frequently to recover their good looks by the unalcoholic regimen of their enforced retreat." In a lecture at Exeter Hall (April 18, 1882) Dr. Norman Kerr, in speaking of the diseases due to alcohol, stated that probably 60 per cent, of the cases of erysipelas were occasioned by it. Sir William Temple, in his essay upon the Cure of Gout by Moxa (Nimeguen, June, 1677), says — PATHOLOGICAL RESULTS. i:?l " Among all the diseases to whicli the intemperance of this age disposes, I have observed none to increase so much as the gout, nor any, I think, of worse consequence to mankind. . . . And if intemperance be allowed to be the common mother of the gout, or dropsy, and of scurvy, etc., I think temperance deserves the first rank among public virtues, as well as those of private men ; and I doubt whether any can pretend to the constant steady exer- cise of prudence, justice, or fortitude, without it. . . . I have known so great cures, and so many, done by obstinate resolutions of di'inking no wine at all, that I put more weight upon the part of temperance than any other." Dr. Erasmus Darwin, in bis famous work, Zoonomia Dr. Darwin (London, 1794), vol. i. sect. xxi. p. 251 (" On Drunken- °" soui. ness "), says concerning gout — " I am well aware that it is a common opinion that the gout is as frequently owing to gluttony in eating as to intemperance in drinking fermented or spirituous liquors. To this I answer that I have seen no person afflicted with gout who has not drank freely of fermented liquor, as wine and water, or small beer; though as the disposition to all diseases which have originated from intoxication is in some degree hereditary, a less quantity of spirituous potation will induce the gout in those who inherit the disposition from their parents." In his work on TJie Nature and Treatment of Gout Pr- ^arror. Maudsley's description of delirium tremens. character of tlie delusions, which, are accompanied by hallucination.s of hearing, vision, and tactile sensation. Ordinary sounds receive undue importance, or are con- verted into terrible threats, the air is full of voices, visions constantly appear and disappear. Commonplace objects assume the form of demons or other horrid objects. Hypereesthesia of the skin, perverted tactile sensation, gives the belief that insects are crawling over the integumen. Irregular chilly sensation and formication, or pricking sensations, are easily converted by the delirious patient into snakes, rats, or other vermin. The patient borrows his delusions largely from his surroundings, although all authorities agree that the avocation of the patient, or the last prominent act he may have engaged in, establish the central delusion of his delirium. If his delusion partakes largely of personal danger, he makes repeated attempts to escape, and often effects his purpose with great cunning. " He will assault those about him in his attempts to get away, or if he imagines they are his enemies. These acts of violence are generally seen in the more maniacal form of delirium. Delusions of a melancholic character are not unfrequently present ; pi'cparations are being made for his funeral, the table is a bier, the sheets are his shroud ; or he is to be drowned, or hung, or terribly abused in some way ; he begs for mercy, he prajs for deliverance, and in a paroxysm of terror may commit suicide if not closely watched." In this connection Dr. Mason quotes the follo^ving from Dr. Maudsley : — ^^ Delirium tremens might be described justly as an acute alcoholism, since there is a chronic alcoholism which is characterized by the slow and gradual development of similar symptoms ; in truth, a chronic delirinin tremens which is called the insanity of alcoholism. Premonitory of it is the same sleeplessness, the same motor restlessness, the same nausea and w^ant of appetite, that go before delirium tremens. Instead, however, of the rapidly rising excitement, the changing hallucinations and delirious in- coherence then following, there is great mental disquietude with morbid suspicions or actual delusions of wrong in- tended or done against him, of wilful provocations and persecutions by neighbours, of thieves about his premises, PATHOLOGICAL RESULTS. 149 of unfaithfulness on the part of his wife, and the like suspicions, which are frequently attended with such hallu- cinations of hearing, of sight, of tactile sensation, as threatening voices heard, insulting gestures or mysterious signs seen, electrical agencies felt. In this state a violent- tempered man, resolved to be even with the scoundrels whom he declares to be persecuting him, sometimes does sad deeds of violence." Prof. Kraft-Ebing, in his book on Judicial Psycho- prof. Pathology (Stuttgart, 1875), citesauthoritiesforsometerrible Kraft-Ebing OD crinitis crimes committed under the hallucinations produced by committed drink ; for example, that of the murder committed by Thiel, "i"^hoiic a German workman, industrious and orderly, and a most haiiucina- affectionate and loving husband and father. In a state of *''"*''■ drunkenness, Thiel was suddenly possessed by the idea that he ought to kill his child. He sprang from the bed, where this idea came to him, and, sinking in terror upon his knees, clasped his hands, and cried out, " Lord Grod ! Lord Jesus ! I must kill my child ! " But the poor wretch overcame this frenzy, patted the little fellow on the head, and bade him sleep. Soon after, the frightful temptation returned with overwhelming power ; he seized an axe and murdered the child, muttering agonized prayers and weep- ing bitterly as he did the deed, which at once sobered the miserable father. If drink can thus fearfully and totally pervert the affections, how terrible and subtle must be its effect on the whole moral being ? Of alcoholic epileptiform mania Dr. Mason says. Dr. Mason " There is no form of mania more dangerous than that on alcoholic ,., ., ., . ■ n Ti Til epileptiform which occurs m the epileptic when influenced by alcohol ; mauia. it matters not whether his epilepsy be directly due to alcohol or to other causes. . . . He is most dangerous because ' he adds to the impulses — sometimes so terrible — to which he is subject from his disease, those which he draws from intoxication.' " The symptoms in chronic alcoholic insanity are divided by Dr. Mason into several groups. He describes the first — chronic alcoholic mania — chronic maniacal type — homicidal tendencies — as " one of the most alcoholic dangerous types of mania that is met with, especially when the mental alienation is not ushered in or accom- 150 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH, Its symptoms. Chronic alcoholic melancholia. Its painful delusions. panied hj a febrile conrlition, or other symptoms that usually point out a departure from, health. He is therefore not regarded as a sick man by his friends, although they may think he acts a little ' queer ; ' he is moody, taciturn, he whispers his suspicions, he picks out his special enemies, he prepares himself against assault, carries weapons on his person, or conceals them in a secret place, he broods over his fancied wrongs ; finally, times and place suit his purpose, the revengeful design he has been nursing for months and hinting about to his immediate acquaintances now finds an outlet, and the press publishes a case of " murder in cold blood ; " his history by degrees comes out, experts are summoned, his true condition is ascer- tained, and he is sent to an asylum. One very common delusion is that of marital unfaithfulness ; some one, generally a near acquaintance who is on visiting terms with his family, is selected as the one who has destroyed the sanctity of his hearth and home. Too often his insane delusions are treated as simply jealousy, but it is a morbid jealousy of the most intense character, and will in its insane fury take the life of some innocent victim. It is a good rule not to take the homicidal vagaries of an intemperate man as a matter of trifling importance, but when he breathes out — it may be threatening and slaughter, although it may be in an undertone — let him be promptly arrested and examined as to his sanity." Of chronic alcoholic melancholia — suicidal tendencies — Dr. Mason says, " The patient is depressed, weeps readily, to a certain extent he is confidential, seems to crave sym- pathy. He will follow you about, and ask your aid against supposed evils that are impending over him. I recall one case where the patient beHeved that his funeral would take place in a few hours. He could hear people preparing for it ; he begged me to delay, if possible, the ceremony ; he was exceedingly sorrowful and depressed. The delusions are various ; persons dead are living, and the living are dead. Events that have happened long since are being re-enacted. Delusions as to locality, as I have said, are often marked. The delusion of poison in the food or drink is oftentimes a very troublesome one. Such persons, however, will take ale or other stimulants when they refuse food, a perversion of taste being the PATHOLOGICAL RESULTS. 151 probable cause of this form of delusion we bave referred to. This delusion is usually subsidiary to more prominent, or leading mental aberrations. The central or prominent delusion is the first to come, the last to leave. As his disordered intellect rights itself, he clings to this often- times persistently, and finally, when his reasoning powers retuim, he listens to argument, and gives up his delusions as a fallacy. It is a curious fact, as in the case we have mentioned, that in subsequent attacks or relapses the same delusions so prominent in previous attacks return, and remain with the same persistency." It would seem as if the intelligent and thoughtful would find in the manifestations of the simplest forms of drunkenness alone, an all-sufficient warning against the use of alcohol. Yet these are but the first signals in a series of warnings so terrible that, in view of them, it is truly surprising that alcoholism ever became a universal ill ; or would be so, did we not in this very fact discover one of the worst effects of the evil — the stultifying of moral sensibility. In the mental phenomena included under the head of alcoholic insanity, we find that the physical channels for the expression of intelligence have been so corroded and mutilated by alcohol, that the communication between body and mind becomes always partially, sometimes wholly, vitiated, and what is left of it so perverted, that the alcoholic has practically reversed the " descent of man " — has dropped himself to a plane where morally the beasts are above him. And still greater than the evil thus done to himself and those around him, is that which he does to succeeding generations in transmitting this curse. 152 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. CHAPTER YII. MORAL RESULTS. Inquiry into § 48. One of the most difficult points to Settle in the between investigation of the drink question is that of alcohol as drink and g^ cause of Crime. That drink is a chief cause of crime crimG. is disputed not only by those who wish to prevent the truth from being kno^vn, but also by some of those who really wish to know the truth ; and such marshalling of accurate data, philosophical research, medical and psychical analysis, as would take it out of dispute, has not yet, it seems, been adequately brought to bear upon it. If, as the judges of criminal courts affirm, and as facts everywhere seem to confirm, drink is the chief cause of crime, it is of the first importance that a know- ledge of this fact should be grounded in the popular mind, as it would undoubtedly and naturally do more than any- thing else to convince the general public of the i-eal scope and character of the drink evil. The importance of this is emphasized at intervals by the publication in reputable journals of ingenious documents, which by omitting the com- parative data, necessary to a correct understanding, and by erroneous deductions, convey impressions wide of the truth. Erroneous Qne example will suffice in illustration. In the Pall a writer in Mali Gazette (Nov. 9, 1883) appeared the following : — tlie Pall Mall Gazette.i^ov. "Is DrINK THE ChIEF SOUECE OF CrIME ? 9, 1883. " A correspondent writes to us as follows on the subject of intemperance and crime : — - "It is by no means an unusual circumstance for judges at assizes and recorders at courts of quarter sessions, while addressing grand juries, and deploring the increase of MOEAL RESULTS. 153 crime, to speak of its close relationship with intemperance, regarding the one as the sure harbinger of the other. If the accepted theory be true, the districts where drunken- ness more extensively prevails would be the most prolific in crime, and drunkenness and crime would rise and fall in the social barometer in equal degrees. Is it so ? Let US see. " The residents of the rural districts of Durham are more prone to habits of intoxication than those of any other county in England, and this evil, unfortunately, is on the increase. In 1879 the number of persons charged by the county police with the offence of drunkenness was 7178; in 1880 the number was 8088; in 1881, 9124 The number of crimes committed in the same districts was, in 1879, 549 ; in 1880, 414 ; in 1881, 426. While, therefore, drunkenness has been increasing, crime has been decreasing, and while the charges of drunkenness for the year amount to nearly fifteen for every thousand of the population, the crimes only reach 0'7 per thousand.* The people of Essex may be considered the most sober of all the inhabitants of the country. The charges for drunken- ness last year numbered 289, or 0"9 to every thousand. The number of crimes committed there numbered 455, or nearly twice the number of charges against persons for drunkenness ; but in Durham twenty persons would be charged with drunkenness to one charged with a crime that would be necessary to be tried by a jury. Pro rata with the population also crime is twice as extensive in Essex as in Durham. "Northumberland is another county where intemperance runs high, yet the number of crimes committed by the rural population was in 1879, 7Q. In 1880 the number was 102 ; and in 1881, 67, or 0'3 per thousand of the population. In 1879 the number of persons charged with drunkenness by the police was 1916 ; in 1880, 1967 ; in 1881, 2145 ; so that here also, while drunkenness has been increasing, crime has been decreasing. Bedfordshire is another county where drunkenness exists to a very limited extent. The number of persons charged here with drunken- ness in 1879 was 232 ; in 1880, 206 ; in 1881, 176, or equal to 1"7 for every thousand of the population. The * See testimony of Justice Hawkins in chapter X. 154 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. crimes coramitted here were, in 1879, 76 ; in 1880, 82 ; in 1881, 102 ; or equal to I'O per thousand — so that crime is three times greater in Bedfordshire than in Northum- berland." The writer goes over Lancashire, Shropshire, Sunder- land, etc., in the same manner, and suggests at the close that — " It would be an easy matter to multiply the number of these illustrations to show that the close relationship between drunkenness and crime is a fallacy, and that the real source of crime exists in some influence, or some failing in moral rectitude, outside that which leads to intemperance." * * Referring to this docnment in the Pall Mall Gazette, the Alliance News (November 17, 1883) says — " In some police districts large numbers of drunken cases are dismissed without being taken formally before the magistrates. This especially prevails where such cases are in overwhelming abundance. Moreover, as a rule, in districts where drunkenness is most abundant, the tone of public feeling against it is apt to be most relaxed, and the disposition to regard tipsy noisiness as a peccadillo not worthy the notice of the police is pretty sure to be most preva- lent. In such districts Watch Committees and magistrates are often personally implicated in the liquor traffic, and naturally fail to en- courage their servants, the policemen, to be strict to mark and severe to seize. Where mayors, aldermen, and other leading public men are addicted either to liquor-selling or to liquor-tippling, even their silent influence will always act as a damper on the zeal of the con- stable. Hence it commonly happens that where there is most drunkenness the number of apprehensions by the police tends to dwindle, whereas these are likely to be more numerous where public opinion is most widely awake to the enormity and iniquity of the liquor traffic. Considerations like these are quite sufficient to show the folly of using the police books of different districts in proof of the comparative drunkenness of those districts. For the rest we need only add that when the judges protest, as earnestly as they are always doing, that most of the crime that comes before them officially is evidently caused by strong drink, they speak not in view of the number of police apprehensions of drunkards, but in direct recognition of the plain and undeniable facts that present themselves to their senses in dealing with criminal cases in their own courts. To doubt the correctness of their conclusions on such a matter is equivalent to writing down some of the most able men in the kingdom as poor, brainless, chattering fools." I may add that the deference due to such statements as those made by the Pall Mall Gazette's correspondent must equally be due to statements of precisely similar scope and grasp ; as, for instance, MORAL RESULTS. 155 These figures might mislead very many who are not specially and amply informed upon the subject, and not familiar with the various data, or the way in which such data essentially affects computation, comparison, and deduction.* This " correspondent " challenges the almost unanimous testimony of the principal judges of the United Kingdom — a testimony covering scores of years of experience — that drink is the chief cause of crime. In this challenge one of two things is plainly intimated : either that the Judicial Bench of Great Britain have been and are fools or knaves ; either these men, whose business it is to inquire into the causes of crime and to pronounce the verdict of law upon the criminal, have been, and are, all incompetent, or else have deliberately deceived the public. Certainly no sober Englishman will admit the former ; and as to the latter, it would be difficult to discover or devise a motive, or a combination of motives, sufficient to induce even one — still less a long succession of judges — to concur in such a misrepresentation. Even were judges constitutionally prone to misstatements, no public body could be less interested in doing so, on the topic in question. In statins' the increase in arrests for drunkenness during the last three or four years — since the temperance agita- tion has become vitally a popular factor — the Pall Mall correspondent does not manifest any knowledge of the well-known fact that the laws against drunkenness in public have been enforced with increased vigour during this period, in various parts of the United Kingdom. Yet this fact is essential to an approximately accurate com- parison of the general relations between di-ink and crime. For instance, during the reign of Queen Anne, when intoxication was regarded as a feat rather than a degrada- those of a recent writer on the Topography of Intemperance (Mac- millan's Magazine, Jan. 1882), who naively alludes to " this singularity in both towns and counties, that generally the larger number of public-houses will be found where there is the smallest amount of drunkenness, and ... in Durham drunkenness prevails to a far greater extent than in any other English county." Ergo, make the people sufficiently and unanimously drunk and there will be no crime ; multiply public-houses and there will be no drunkenness ! ! ! Durham seems on the whole a most remarkable county ! * See opening remarks of chaiJter X. concerning statistics. 156 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Relations between sobriety and crime as con- trasted with the same be- tween drink and crime. Examples of iinintentional alcoholic criminality. The quality of drunken- ness shown to be dependent on the liind of drink used, and on the tempera- ment and circum- stances of the drinker. tion, and hardly any one was arrested for it ; crime was terribly prevalent— what would this correspondent have deduced from statistics of the relations between drink and crime then ? However difficult it may be to demonstrate the exact relations between drunkenness and crime, there is happily not the same difficulty in establishing the relations between sobriety and crime ; of a hundred persons in the dock, few, if any, are total abstainers ; and the relations between sobriety and the absence of crime is being daily practically demonstrated on various prohibition estates, as at Bess- brook in Ireland, etc. So far as I have been able to pursue investigation on this point, I have been specially impressed with the following facts. Crimes are not often conceived or committed during actual drunkenness, though often very di'eadful ones do result from the negligence and oblivion of drink ; such as the sea captain commits, when an overdose of grog makes him steer his ship on dangerous reefs ; or the engineer, whose extra glass means a mismanaged engine, a collision, and the mangling and killing of people trusted to his care ; or the drunken officer, when he muddles the order of his commander, and prematurely or altogether mistakenly exposes his men to slaughterous fire ; or the drunken physician, whose reckless prescription or whose total neglect results in the death of some beloved one and the blasting of dear human hopes ; or the drunken lawyer, who tipples away the life, honour, or property of his helpless client. The quality of drunkenness depends greatly on the nature of the intoxicant used, as well as upon the tempera- ment and physical condition of the drinker. For example, it is well known that drunkenness occasioned by malt liquors generally induces a sluggishness of mind, a lethargy of the senses, to which frenzy or ferocity in thought or act, to which the formation of a plan, or execution of one previously conceived, are almost impossible. It must be remembered, however, that the effect of malt liquors is greatly determined by the quality of the hops and the presence or absence of coccuhis indicus or other adulterating ingredients. In an article on Beer and MORAL RESULTS. 157 Crime {Medical Times and Gazette, London, April, 1872), the following statement with regard to beer occurs : — ■ " Its intoxicating power is far greater than can be ac- counted for by the mere alcohol it contains. . . . Cheap and coarse varieties of the hop, a plant nearly allied to the Indian hemp or bliang, may be capable of producing a furious delirium quite apart from alcoholic intoxica- tion. ... A magistrate's clerk once told us that the worst assaults and crimes of violence in his district were men who drank at public-houses supplied by one particular brewery." Wines — with the exception of the strongest and most viciously adulterated — generally cause an idiotic jollity, silly good-humour, meaningless generosity, coupled often with a kind of loose frankness of sensuality. Brief choler, sufficient for the commission of sudden crimes, is possible to this condition, but evil designs previously harboured are unlikely to recur or be carried out. On the other hand, spirituous liquors,* especially those containing quantities of fusil oil — such as raw whiskies, gin, etc. — excite almost invariably a demon-like frenzy, and. when thus intoxicated, people who in a sober state would neither conceive of, nor countenance violence, lust, or destruction of property or life, become capable of any imaginable infamy and crime. These distinctions, which deserve most careful atten- The true tion, and a large variety of sub-distinctions and dilferen- afcohoUc"^^'^' tiations, are necessary to any proper comprehensive criminal estimate of the relations between drinking and crime. ^'^ '^' ^" But the general truth remains, that not in the drunken state, but in the various intermediary stages between sobriety and intoxication, lies the field of alcoholic criminal activity. § 49. It has been seen in the foregoing pages how General alcoholic drinking lowers the whole plane of physical health ; ph™'iJ,togicai that it ruins digestion, poisons the circulation, making it and meutai sluggish, as in the amphibious creatures ; that it preserves waste tissue and checks excretion, — making the human body, so to speak, a case or cask of preserved compost ; * " Beer is brutalizing ; wine impassions ; whisky infuriates, but eventaally unmans." — Dr. Bock, of Leipsic, in article on the " Moral Effects of Food and Drink," in British Medical Journal (1879). 158 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH, that this internal condition is presently externally adver- tised in disgusting changes of the countenance and bearing ; that the nervous system after continued over-excitation becomes eccentric and fitful in its action — small causes putting it to the highest tension of irritability, while great reasons for excitement are regarded with apathy ; that these derangements are attended with baleful visions, impure fantasies, weariness with self and disgust with life ; the whole hydra evil culminating in idiocy, insanity, and temptations to and commission of all kinds of crimes and sensualities, theft, incendiarism, suicide, and murder. Thus, in one terrible group we have the physical and mental results of alcoholism inextricably involved with the moral results, one causing the other and vice versa, in a system of consecutive inseparable reactions — a banyan tree of human misery. Dr.Hufeiand " Other vices," says Dr. Huf eland, in his work on insusce ti Poisoning hy Brandy (1802), "admit the hope of amend- bility to ment, but this performs its work of destruction thoroughly, th™drUik[ng ^^^ without the prospect of remedy, for it extinguishes in habit. the system all susceptibility for remedy," and indeed all consciousness of the need of such susceptibility. Fable of the I remember once reading a fable to this effect : — Once **'T'^b'™*° there was lying by the side of a ditch, a pig. On the pig. other side lay a man. The pig was sober, the man was drunk. The pig had a ring in its nose, the man had a ring on his finger. Some one passing exclaimed so that the pig heard it — " One is judged from the company he keeps." Instantly the pig rose and went away. As the alcohol-poisoned body, in its need for its life- essential — water — takes more and ever more of the poison that creates but never slakes that thirst, so the alcohol- poisoned mind — in its need of the pure medium for its manifestations with which it was originally endowed — all clouded and astray, plunges deeper and deeper into all forms of reckless, coarse excesses, its hope for ever mocked by its own rudderless di'ifting continuance in sin-begetting sin. Physical and For though body and spirit are distinct, yet in this life parallel*'^'* and for this life's purposes they are indissoluble, man having no expression beyond the manifesting power of the physical mechanism he dwells in. Thus it is seen once MOKAL RESULTS. 159 and for all that a physical effect is a moral effect. As the sap in the tree permeates to the least curl in the least rootlet, and so determines what the tree shall be in the air, so whatsoever permeates man's physical system de- termines in kind and degree the manifestation of his spirit. But in saying that a physical effect is always a moral A notable effect, one great exception must be made by marking the tms^ruie? distinction between harm voluntarily and harm arbitrarily incurred. For example, an upright man, clean in mind, heart, and habit, who would not of himself under any temptation abuse his body, or ignore those rights of others invested in its purity, may in many ways be forced to do so through poverty, by exhausting labour, bad air, and poor food ; or through wanton caprice he might be bound hand and foot, and have alcohol poured down his throat till he was " dead drunk," — and instances for my meaning might be multiplied ad infinitum from facts. In these cases the body suffers just as much as if the abuses had occurred by the consent of the will, but the mind and character do not — a beautiful evidence of the existence in the body of a tenant superior to and distinct from itself. Of course such arbitrary injury could be inflicted, could extend over such a period as to undermine the moral force, but the very fact that it takes time and much time to do such devil's work as this, only serves to point my distinction. But wherever a physical effect is produced by the will's consent, we may look for the moral result in kind, and at last for the most deplorable of all results — in the extinction of will either to consent or reject. In his Confessions, Charles Lamb, one of the brightest charies of gentle spirits ever extinguished in the baleful fires of Lamb's alcoholism, wrote : — warning. " Could the youth, to whom the flavour of his first wine is delicious, look into my desolation, and be made to understand what a dreary thing it is when a man feels himself going down a precipice with open eyes and a passive will — to see his destruction and to have no power to stop it, and yet to feel it, all the way, emanating fi'om himself j to perceive all goodness emptied out of him, and 160 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. yet not be able to forget a time when it was otherwise — to bear about the piteous spectacle of self-ruin ! " The effect of § 50. The chief power by which we attain and maintain on the^wiTi. t^'^6 womanhood and manhood is the power of will, of sane decision. And this power is the fii'st stronghold to be attacked by alcoholism. If alcohol were a sentient being, it could hardly act with greater apparent intelligence than it does in its insidious sapping and mining of the will, as if it knew, that redoubt once carried, no further resistance need be feared. In this subjugation of the will, alcohol incidentally but very remarkably defines the distinction between will and intention — so often mistaken for each other, to the moral shipwreck of the mistaking ones. Difference Will forms and carries out intention, but intention is not between will .,x;.n l andinten- ""^^- . .,i • i tion. ("The In alcoholism the will is destroyed, and intentions — [spaved^wVth ^^^^ the arrows in a slain cliieftain's quiver — become the ?°°'* . „ passive agents of the victor's bow. —Martin Is there a more contemptibly pitiable sight than that of Luther.) ^]^g wiU-less drunkard, who, with half-drained glass in his shaking hand, assures you that it is " hizh 'ntenzhn to shtop drink'ng " ? Instance of Dr. John Cheyne, of Dublin, in A Statement of Certain drfnk°tT'^°^ J^ec^s of Temperance Societies (1829), cites this remark- annihilate able instance of the thraldom of drink, especially in its the wiiL power to keep down the once conquered will. A gentleman of birth and refined tastes, deservedly popular for his attractive qualities, became habitually intemperate. A dear friend wrote to him, " Tour family are in the utmost distress on account of this unfortunate habit. They see that your business is neglected, your moral influence is gone, your health is ruined." To this he replied, "Your remarks are indeed too true, but I can no longer resist temptation. If a bottle of brandy stood on one hand and the pit of hell yawned on the other, and if I knew that I would be pushed in as surely as I took one more glass, I could not refrain. . . . You are all very kind. ... I ought to be grateful, . . . but spare your- selves the trouble of trying to reform me; the thing is now impossible." Man's will being destroyed — facilis descensus Averni, and that " Hell is the shadow of a soul on fire," becomes MORAL RESULTS. 161 the actual experience of the tempest-exhausted spirit, and in that gloomy shadow the panic-stricken family of the drunkard leads a rayless cowering life, more dreary than Christian's in the Valleys of Humiliation and the Shadow of Death — and there is no Great-heart to bear the poor wife and mother company — to teach or defend the hapless children. As son, citizen, neighbour, husband, father, and friend. Moral in- the drunkard is insolvent ; his responsibilities in all these th'^d°*^^°^ relations are like obligations discharged by spurious notes, in the first consciously— for he is not a sot at once — afterwards reipon^! ^'^'^ mechanically offered. His mother ! Does he remember biiities of the never- weary love, the gentle, watchful care and service ^^- ^^"^'^ and self-sacrifice, which rouuded his young life day by day ? N"ay, to get a quartern of whisky he would pawn the bed on which she lies dying. His fellow-citizens, his neighbours, his friends ! Why, citizen, they are persons to be borrowed from, if they wiU lend ; to i^eighbour, be stolen from, if they won't ; to be chicaned, cheated, cajoled, worried, and wearied into giving the means for drink — almost always on pleas of a chance that can only be secured by a little ready money (for drones and knaves are cunning in the use of pleas which could honestly be urged by the deserving), a dodge deceiving neither; and the meanness of the drunkard in these relations, grafts a reflex meanness and sense of guilty partnership upon the one who helps him down. The drunkard's wife ! Is she a being to cherish, watch Husband over, and serve as a sane man finds his happiness in ^nd father. doing ? Oh no, a victim to vent all his unleashed and degraded passions on, to cheat, to wheedle, to poison, to make into a penny-earning drudge, and to beget poisoned offspring from. There is the reverse side, where the wife is the one who drinks away her intelligence, and sinks into the deepest mire of degradation, neglecting her husband and her children, destroying love, respect, and hope, bringing her family to want and despair, and keeping them there. Such a home is the most miserable spot on earth — it is more wretched than the home where all are drunkards, for the contrast between the vain efforts and piteous hope- ^°™^°f''"' lessness of the husband and father striving as he does to and mother.'' M 162 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. retain liis own manhood, to be mother as well as father to his helpless children, and the complete and obstinate resistance of the besotted companion and spoiler of his days — is one to make the stoutest hope for the race falter. To such a home comes the weary father from his work at night — to see the dirt and the disorder he was forced to leave unremedied in the morning — grown worse for the orgie of the day — to see the children huddled away from the mumbling, blear-eyed, towzled, filthy-smelling heap on the straw, which is all they know of motherhood, and all he will ever know of wifehood ; wailing for food, or too cold to wail, or perhaps stupefied fi^om fear, or perhaps sucking at the half -drained bottle which has fallen from the mother's palsy-loosened clutch, too stunted and blunted to be glad to see him, even though he brings them the only food and the only care they ever get. This is as much worse than where the father alone is the drunkard, as the degraded woman is a worse and lower creature than the degraded man. Worse, too, because to womanhood and motherhood God has given the dominating moral effectiveness, whether for good or evil. As con- And in the drunkard's home, where the faithful wife theMmT 3'"<1 mother bears her burden without sinking into the sin home when -which causes it, you will see something of the meaning of mother bears home saved to him and his family, something of the clean- her burdens ^iuggg and svstem which produce some kind of daily in patience .•'„ , -i,, pi-i ^ ^ and sobriety, routine, a time for and a semblance of daily meals, however meagre the fare ; the little ones are washed and combed, and, as far as may be, saved from the worst contact of the slums, where the father's sin locates the home ; and often in one or more of the children you will see a wonderful moral force and power of sympathy and helpfulness, by which the unfortunate mother's steps are stayed, and her heart saved from utterly breaking ; for whatever poison the child has received from its father, the mother's love and virtue has also entered in to combat — to transmute, and, if not to eradicate, at least to prevent its gaining the supremacy ; and often it seems that the mother's character has been able to wholly form and infuse that of the child, confining the evil birthright bestowed by the erring father to the child's stunted and crippled body. Rarely indeed are such signs of hope found among the MORAL RESULTS. 163 offspring of the debauched mother, whatever the father may be, and in those rare cases it is generally found that such children were born before the mother had become degraded. And how terrible in its deprivations is the curse entailed by the alcoholized father on such children as the mother's virtue has partially saved, not only the hospitals — with their bedridden little forms, always painfully wistful, and often lovely little faces — but the streets, with their misshapen figures of malformed and half-limbed, wan-faced, and pre- m.aturely old children bear witness. Oh, fathers and mothers in pleasant homes, where want and its temptation have never come, whose little ones are rosy with health and innocent sheltered happiness, whose fair white shapes, clear radiant eyes, soft eager voices, and kisses dew-pure, fill you with delight and reverence, and make you understand at least why He should say, " Of such is the kingdom of Heaven ! " Oh, take heed, take heed for those other wronged and defrauded little ones who are worse than motherless, fatherless, and homeless, and for their sakes, and that such as they may no more be called out of the darkness into yet darker life — for these surely good and loving reasons put away — and be first in putting for ever away from your lips, and your homes, and your example — this one indulgence, not missed from among your luxuries, that by your easy and self- benefiting sacrifice you may enter into such fellowship • with the humblest as will rebuke, inspire, and sustain them. For what we have done unto the least of these, that alone shall we be able to take with us to speak for us when we have left all the possessions and all the distinc- tions of this world behind. § 51. Though there are grades and varieties of alcoholic The gradual degradation, and all do not sink equally low or manifest like ^^j finaf^ degrees and kinds of lusts, ferocities, or bestial indifference, destruction yet the dark picture given is the true picture of the •** '=^*'"*'^*^'"- general effect of alcoholism on the moral being of man. And if we closely study the details which make this dark whole, we shall see more and more of the subtle and intricate ways by which the loss of will ^^nravels the character stitch by stitch, till it has neither form nor significance, and is but a limp thread trailed hither and thither by the fitful winds of temptation. 1G4 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. The clever disguises assumed by the alcoholized will. In political life. In the rela- tions between niastf'r and man. For though alcoholism always undermines the will, the degree in which it does so is determined by the mental quality and temperament of the drinker, and the extent to which he canoes the habit. So that in some instances moderate drinking has totally undermined the will, while in others, excessive drinking has only partially overcome this power. In all cases, however, the will is so far sapped that every relation in life is more or less tainted with the dry-rot of unreliability. The loss of will by alcoholism has many deceiving forms, often takes on the shape of good-natured concession, as in the politician who, even while believing in the true principle, and wishing well to the right measure in the issue at stake, succumbs to the first sufficient urgency, without regard to his own convictions, is called obliging, and thinks himself so, but in reality yielded because resistance was not in him. This is a negative action of will-lessness, very multiform in its phases, very widespread and vitiating in its effects on social and political life. But there is another kind in which all will but self-will is gone. The politician in this case is morally nil; he does not even negatively lean toward integrity, he cares only to gain some higher position, some more sounding honour, some larger pay, and sells his vote and buys as many of the votes of others as he can for the gaining of his end, promising anything and everything without the faintest intention of carrying it out. He is spoken of as a man of iron will, sure to make his way, to carry his object, and he thinks himself a man of strong will. He is only an egoist, morally unable to resist, or even to hesitate at, any evil whereby his selfish aim is assured. Alcoholism comes in to spoil the relations between the master and the working man. The" drinking working man, no matter how skilled and clever in his workmanship when sober, cannot claim the full wages of his skill, because he cannot be relied on, and his master is always on the look-out for a sober and steady skilled artisan, with whom to oust and replace the drinkei*. The latter may work well for many days, but suddenly one morning he comes into the shop, and in three minutes has blundei-ed away material worth a week's wages, or by his derangement of the machinery some luckless comrade is MORAL RESULTS. 165 cut in pieces, or, if furious instead of maudlin, lie has in a few minutes smashed more than he can make good in weeks or months of labour. And yet, again, is missing for days when work is pressing and hands cannot be spared. The master who drinks, even though he be what is called a moderate drinker, is thereby a tacit patron of all this unreliability, and himself illustrates it, often failing to carry out special promises to his men, thinking he will, but lacking will-power to do more than think and promise, and his unreliability further vitiates the relations between master and man. In every relation in life alcoholism, whether slowly or swiftly, surely destroys all certainty but And in the certainty of disaster and downfall, for the individual, general hfe. for governments, for the race. The tragedies and crimes to which alcoholism leads are Alcoholism's as various as the moral unreliabilities which are the first gradations , . from moral steps towards crimes. unreii- The crimes are not committed only or most frequently to turpitude during actual drunkenness, but as the results of a long and crimes, course of the drinking habit which has sapped the will, ossified the heart, paralyzed the conscience. The forger must be sober, but to be capable of forgery The forger. he must — perhaps not in all, but in most cases — have been morally emasculated by drink, or have inherited the absence of moral perception and moral force which alcoholism brought about in his progenitors. The burglar must be wary and cool, but alcohol and its The burglar, effects must have gone before, either in him or his fathers, ere he can choose this sort of livelihood. The murderer lying in wait for his victim is cool — but The somewhere in him or his fathers the demon of drink has '^"''i^rer. persuaded him that gold is worth blood purchase. On the other hand, these same crimes and various others are also committed not in coolness nor in ferocity, even when deliberated, but from inability to resist the pressure of circumstances made up of goading needs, stimulated and supplemented by sudden or gradually augmenting temptations. In these two distinct orders of criminals, guilty of precisely the same crimes, we see the action of the loss of moral will in its two forms : the The negative negative loss, which may exist with painful longings to be "^^ ° "' ' better without power to even determine to try ; and the 166 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. The positive loss of will. Rev. Chan- ning on the difference between poverty with and without drink. positive loss, whicli means absence of the moral "will, i.e., of desire to be good and true, as in avarice, cold-blooded murder, and savage Inst. Prof. Kraft-Ebing says that the drinker loses clear sense of what is honourable, moral, and decent, grows indifferent even to such conflict between good and evil within him as remains possible; indifferent to the ruin of his family, to the contempt of his fellow- citizens ; and that hand in hand with these results goes that of increasing irritability, until his violent tempers burst out without provocation and become literally un- governable. In associating the evils of intemperance with the evils of poverty, we are apt to think of them as identical, and the poverty as almost the worst of the two. Rev. William Ellery Channing, in his address on Temperance, in Boston (1837), thus ably discriminated on this point : — " Intemperance is to be pitied and abhorred for its own sake, much more than for its outward consequences. These consequences owe their chief bitterness to their criminal source. We speak of the miseries which the di-unkard carries into his family. But take away his own brutality, and how lightened would be these miseries. We talk of his wife and children in rags. Let the rags continue ; but suppose them to be the effects of an innocent cause. Suppose the di-unkard to have been a virtuous husband and an affectionate father, and that sickness and not vice has brought his family thus low. Suppose his wife and children, bound to him by a strong love, which a life of labour for their support and of unwearied kindness has awakened ; and suppose them to know that his toil for their welfare has broken down his frame ; suppose him able to say, 'We are poor in this world's goods, but rich in affection and religious trust. I am going from you, but I leave you to the Father of the fatherless and to the widow's God.' Suppose this, and how changed these rags ! How changed the cold naked room ! The heart's wai-mth can do much to withstand the winter's cold, and there is hope, there is honour, in this virtuous indigence. What breaks the heart of the drunkard's wife is not that he is poor, but that he is a drunkard. " We look too much at the consequences of vice, too MORAL RESULTS. 167 little at the vice itself. It is to be desired that when man lifts a suicidal arm against his highest life, when he quenches reason and conscience, that he and all others should receive a solemn startling warning of the greatness of his guilt ; that terrible outward calamities should bear witness to the inward ruin which he is working ; for the outward evils, dreadful as thej seem, are but faint types of the ruin within. We should see in them God's respect to His own image in the soul. His parental warnings against the crime of quenching the intellectual and moral life." In the sacredness of family life — as the foundation The founda- and perpetual well-spring of human worth, happiness, and human progress ; in the incorruptible faithfulness of men and happiness, women, not to their pleasures and impulses, not even to progress^ their individual aspii^ations, but to their plain daily duties and responsibilities towards others, — whether these duties have been voluntarily assumed or by circumstances forced upon them— in these things in this conduct of life — though personal hopes may be lost — manhood and womanhood inflnitely more precious than any personal gain, remain pure and effective ; and childhood — -the raost direct and solemn of all the trusts a gracious Grod reposes in us — is protected. It is only when the passion of love is separated — wrenched from its citadel and source in the crystal sphere of modesty and true, deep affection where divine wisdom planted it, to live for ever and be the for ever fresh and for ever sweet inspiration to all human loyalties ; it is only when selfishness and insidious self-betrayal outrages and dislodges it, that it is lost out of God's meaning and purpose, and becomes the sensual fury which goads men and women to break all ties, all fidelities ; to forget what honour is like, and grovel weakly in, or ferociously gloat over, the degradation of all that is meant by the good words " love " and " home." And it is here in the home-world, the heart-world, that Dnnk the drink, having subjugated the will, confused and gradually enemy of obliterated moral distinctions, comes at last to its chief prey, tbese. the affections, the emotions, the passions, and does the most deadly, the most ruinous — because the most irreparable — of all its fell work. In its blight the man who wooed with fervour and wedded with pure intent, parts first, slowly, 168 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. "witli self-respect, and then more rapidly with all other respect, and sells or forsakes his wife, as callous to her anguish — yes, actually becomes as incapable of under- standing it as of caring for it — as he is indifferent to the coarseness of the vile women he consorts with in her stead ; or, worse, he makes his wife a physical sharer in his own pollutions, regardless of the result to her or to the children who may inherit. Brothers traffic in the honour of their sisters ; some men gamble literally with their wives for the stakes, or pledge their daughters for cash to the lowest libertine that can pay — yes, and act as the decoy in fulfilling the atrocious pledge ! * Finally, as the circle narrows, as the lusts exhaust themselves, the alcohol-driven wretch slinks more and more into the lowest haunts, where unimaginable forms of sensuality submerge him at last in imbecility, whose fainter and fainter gleams of consciousness consist of impotent throes of the degraded senses. Then total darkness, and the results of the work of alcoholism are complete. Of course, in dealing with a great, widely prevailing evil, only the general sum of its effects can be presented in any one work of ordinary dimensions ; and it is iinder- stood that this sum comprises almost infinite variations of kind, of method, of degrees, of effect that may not be categorically specified. For example, in showing that dinnk destroys will, moral perception, conscience, affection, self-respect, and regard for others — in saying, in a word, that the drinker sinks into lower than bestiality until the final extinction of all manliness, I am not asserting that every taster of wine sinks to the lowest level, or that any one or all of these evil results is at once and strongly manifested in every drinker. If this were so, surely no books need be written, no pledges taken, no prayers be made, no tears be shed to save man from alcoholism. That which is asserted is, that drink tends, however slowly and insidiously, and * Cardinal M'Cabe, in a recent pastoral on the state of Ireland, speaks of the degraded men and women " who, that their fierce passion for drink may be satisfied, would sell wife, husband, or child to any one who would minister but for a day to their iusatiable cravings for diink." MORAL RESULTS. 169 with whatever delay of apparent signs, in every case to these results ; if persisted in, manifests them in more or less marked degrees, that the danger of the worst squarely menaces whoever forms the habit, and that in a frightful numerical proportion this worst has been and is being daily realized all around us. " At what particular point does any man cease to be sober and begin to be drunk ? What quantity or strength of alcohol may one imbibe with the perfect assurance of retaining the sober equilibrium of all his faculties ? How long may one be accustomed to a very moderate daily quantity of wine or spirits without incurring any danger of forming an appetite for strong drink ? These and other such questions cannot be answered, because there is no line discernible, and no ingenuity can calculate where or when the line is crossed which separates moderation from excess, sobriety from drunkenness. " There is a point indefinitely near the starting point of unmistakable sobriety, and yet some distance from it, where a slight derangement of the mental powers, a little dimness of intellectual vision, some lack of tenderness in conscience, some relaxing of the power of will — all im- perceptible, it may be, to others — become at least suspected by the individual himself . . . but while it would be uncharitable and rude in the estimation of society, and libellous in the eye of the law, to call this by the name of drunkenness ; yet, call it by what name we will, it is a departure from strict absolute sobriety, and an incipient movement along the line which leads to the grossest intemperance. The higher nature has begun to lose, and the lower to gain influence and strength ; it needs but a little more impetus in the same dii^ection, it needs but the same process repeated sufficiently often to create the drunkard's appetite, and to procure the drunkard's name. A start has already been made along that line which is so thickly strewn with the wreck of much that was great and noble lying in accumulated masses of degradation, wretchedness, and crime." * I have avoided exaggeration ; I have kept well within * Temperance Reformation, and its Claims upon the Christian Church, by Rev. James ymith (London, 1875). 170 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. the bounds of the truth which my researches have nn- expectedly revealed to me ; I have purposely refrained , from citing from the multitudes of proved and certified instances of the worst evils as I have described them, lest by too greatly shocking and even stunning the sensibilities of my readers I should thwart my hope of helping to arouse deep feeling and genuine sustained effort to com- prehend and overcome this, the worst, the secretest, the stealthiest, bloodthii'stiest, cruelest, and strongest fiend that has ever got into the hearts, the homes of men — to arouse this feeling and this purpose in every heart this little book reaches, as this feeling and purpose have been aroused in mine. CHAPTER VIII. HEREDITY, OR THE CURSE ENTAILED ON DESCENDANTS BT ALCOHOL. A law of ancient Carthage forbade all drinks but water on days of marital intercourse. " Drunkards beget drunkards." — Plutarch. " The children of drunkards are not likely to have sound brains." — Gellius. " Dipsomania is always hereditary, always a spontaneous neurosis, absolutely independent of the habits of the individual." — Dr. Folle. TILLE. — See Quarterly Journal of Inebriety (October, 1883), p. 260. § 52. The perpetuation of the human race, together with the extinction of what is valueless to it — whether individual, family, tribe, or nation — are closely regulated by laws which in themselves manifest the profoundest wisdom. On the laws of heredity especially, a seal is set which The laws of no man can completely violate ; i.e., though he may infringe IrofJrtion w upon and disregard all other general laws of his being, the race, until to all intents and purposes they cease to be carried out, the laws by which he bequeaths himself to new generations will continue to effectuate themselves even after he has lost the mental and physical individuality through which the general laws act. Were we insulated in our individualities instead of There?ponsi- being intimately interdependent, we might do harm to parentage. ourselves and deny all right of interference or even remonstrance from without : but since in nothing can we act without producing an endless consecution of effects touching the lives and rights of others ; — in nothing can 172 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. we have so little right to act without the thoughtfullest, most unselfish regard to the claims of others, as in the chief act for which we are qualified — the act of creating a new being who shall partake of our essence in himself and transmit the same, whatever its quality, to untold successive generations. For we are pre-eminently parents ; the race lives only in the possible motherhood or fatherhood of each individual, and the desire for children and devoted attachment to them is the most ineradicable feeling and deepest fundamental law of all healthy mature being. Therefore, to what end the laws of heredity shall be effectuated, is the foremost question which concerns us as responsible beings. Dr. Marc ^^- ^^^^-^c Lorin, in his General View of the Laivs of i^rin on the Heredity (Thesis for the degfree in medicine, Paris, 1875), general laws •' ^ ° > j /> of heredity. SayS : " The transmission of characteristics of species and race is admitted by everybody who deals with the body or the soul. Nobody fears to admit within these limits the fatality of birth. It is thus that every historian refers to the national character in explaining the events in the lives of a people, recognizing its persistence, and pronouncing the consequences often inevitable. The French of this day recognize themselves in the portrait of the Ganls as di^wn by Julius Ceesar. The modern Greeks are in many respects the same whom Demosthenes addressed. If you take a young savage whose pareiits were hunters, vain will be your efforts to cultivate him and adapt him to the habits of civilized life. The voice of his ancestor speaks to him, incessantly recalling him to the instinct and adventures of forest life. " Heredity is the result of a very general law, by virtue of which all the anatomic elements of the body possess the property of giving direct birth to similar elements, or of determining in their own vicinity a genera- tion of elements of the same kind (Littre et Robin). The phenomena of nutrition depend upon this same law, by virtue of which the human body, incessantly renewed, remains always identical with itself from the distribution of atomic elements." Dr. Bourgeois Dr. Bourgeois, in L' Amour (1860), says that — HEREDITY. 17*3 " In transmitting' the germ of life, parents transmit to their children their own resemblance, physical and moral. The children are parts of ourselv^es ; it is our flesh, our blood, our souls, our examples, our lessons, our passions which re-live in them." Dr. E. G. Figo^, in his Physiological Operation of Alcohol Dr. Figg. (Manchester, 1862), says — " Is organic conformation transmissible to posterity ? In our bitter experience we know it is. Half a dozen brothers and sisters perish in phthisis, and the physician explores the antecedents of the family for the origin of the catastrophe. A man drops dead with valvular disease of the heart, and on the transit of a few years the accident is repeated in the person of his son, simply because the basis of the disease was communicated in an organ defectively constructed. " And is a cerebral co7iformation less hereditary than tubercular diathesis, or cardiac imperfection ? The very breeders of horses insure docility in the progeny, by the existence of that quality in the parentage. Consider the mental vigour manifested in various families, generation after generation. The Gregories, the Alisons, the Sheridans, the Kembles, the Porters, the Munros ; if talent be in- herited, it can only be conveyed with the peculiar cerebral structure exhibiting it." Although the ephemeral traits of the parents may The scope of seldom reappear in the children — only that which has effects'*'^ become individualized being genei-ally transmitted — yet we constantly have evidence that even general undefinable tendencies of our being, upward or downward, are trans- missible ; yes, even the struggles and conflicts in the inmost hearts of the parents, though never by them revealed, may all, whether well or ill fought out, be reflected in the child. And it is within the working of these laws that we find intoxicants, especially alcohol, endangering — as does almost no other evil — the whole future of the whole race of man ; and to the startling words of Flourens, " Man no longer dies, he kills himself," we may add, — Man not only kills himself ; he kills his offspring in the womb, and degrades that heaven-ordained crucible of life into a machine for creating mental and moral and physical monstrosities — for the spui'ious replenishment of the earth. 174 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Various authorities on heredity. Erasmus Darwin. Rev. Edward Barry. Dr. Rosch. Dr. Moral. § 53. The Frencli historian Amyot, and the English philosopher Lord Bacon, were probably the first in modern times to deal with the question of alcoholic heredity. Erasmus Darwin, in his Botanical Garden (1781), says, "It is remarkable that all the diseases from drinking spirituous or fermented liquors are liable to become hereditary, even to the third generation, gradually increasing, if the cause be continued, till the family becomes extinct." In his Essay on Wedlock (Reading, 1806) the Rev. Edward Barry says — " It would be as nnreasonable to expect a rich crop from a barren soil, as that strong and healthy children should be born of parents whose constitutions have been worn out with intemperance and disease. What a dreadful inheritance is the gout, the scurvy, etc. ! How happy had it been for the heir of many a great estate had he been born a healthy beggar rather than to inherit his father's fortunes at the expense of inheriting his disease ! " Children born of intemperate parents bear in their birth the germs of disease, die prematurely, or drag along a languishing existence, useless to society, depraved and possessed with evil instincts." A like testimony is this of Dr. C. Rosch, in his The Abuse of Spirituous Drinks (Tubingen, 1839) : " The children of men and women who are given to drink have always a weak constitution, are either delicate and nervous to excess, or heavy and stupid. In the former case they often fall victims to convulsions and die suddenly, or become a prey to water on the brain, and later to pulmonary phthisis. In the latter case they are seized by atrophy, and sink into imbecility. In both cases they are exposed to all the varied forms of scrofula, rash, and, on reaching maturity, gout." Dr. B. A. Morel, in his treatise on the Degeneration of the Human Bace (Paris, 1857), says of alcoholic heredity, " There is no other disease in which hereditary influences are so fatally characteristic. Imbecility and idiocy are the extreme terms of the degradation in the descendants of drinkers, but a great number of intermediary stages develop themselves, . , . beyond the positive data afforded by observation of hereditary influences, it is impossible for HEREDITY. 175 us to form a just idea of certain monstrosities, physical and moral. ... It is a law for the preservation of the race, which strikes alcoholics with early impotence, and their descendants are not only intellectually feeble, but this degradation is joined with congenital impotence." Dr. Figg says (op. cit.), "The brain of the drinkers Dr. Figg. child is as often the miniature of that of his father, as is the impress of his features. Education may do much for him, conscience and self-respect more ; yet the germs of those vices which, precipitated the parent's ruin will, in too many instances, defy eradication. " Perhaps tbe largest class of character is one to which, no special reference has hitherto been made — a person possessing a mediocrity of mental power, with a mind only partially developed by education, conversing superficially on a number of subjects, without thinking deeply on any ; such characters are admirably adapted for the routine of mere commercial or artisan life. By constant drinking, however, even without reaching the point of intoxication, such intellects may be almost obliterated. To them reasoning was never habitual, consequently the cerebral surface, under the contact of alcohol, is less injected than the base ; hence the function of the intellectual brain is completely superseded by that of the instinctive ; their very few ideas, suggested by the society of the public- house, or the sentiments current round the dinner tables on the retiring of the ladies, admit of no variation or argument. What wonder that they become social non- entities, and assimilated to the beasts in their desire for the gratification of mere animal appetites ! " Dr. E. Lanceraux says, in his article Alcoholism Dr. Lance- (Dict. Encycl. des Sciences Med., Paris, 1865), " The person ""aux. who inherits alcoholism is generally marked with degenera- tion particularly manifested in disturbances of the nervous functions. As an infant he dies of convulsions or other nervous disorders ; if he lives, he becomes idiotic or imbecile, and in adult life bears these special characteris- tics : the head is small (tendency to microcephalism), his physiognomy vacant, a nervous susceptibility more or less accentuated, a state of nervousness bordering on hysteria, convulsions, epilepsy, sad ideas, melancholia, hypochondria, — such are the effects, and these with a passion for alcoholic 176 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Dr. Maudsley. Professor Jaccoud. Dr. Baer. Dr. GendroD. beverages, an inclination to immorality, depravity, and cynicism, are the sorrowful inheritance, which, unfortunately a great number of individuals given to drink bequeath to their children." Dr. Maudsley says that such children " come into the world without having either the will or the strength to struggle against their fate ; they are step-children of nature, suffering under the heel of tyranny — the tyranny of poor constitutions." Prof. Sigismund Jaccoud says, in his Alcoholism (Fatlio- logie Interne, Paris, 1877), " Of the children of drinkers, some become imbeciles and idiots ; others are feeble in mind, exhibit moral perversion, and sink by degrees into complete degradation ; still others are epileptics, deaf and dumb, sci-ofulous, hydrocephalic, etc. ... A survey of the race leads us to affirm that alcoholism is one of the greatest causes of the depopulation and degenei-ation of the nations." Dr. A. Baer (in Alcoholismus, 1878) calls attention to the fact that " the inherited desire for drink often remains latent, till by severe, acute, or chronic disease, or mental excitement, the nervous system has become weakened, when the alcoholic impulse leaps suddenly into activity." * In his essay on Hereditary Alcoholism (Thesis for the degree in medicine, Paris, 1880), Dr. E. Geudron says, " The drinker is often incapable of having living children. If he does have any, they are driven to drinking just as he himself, and, being less robust, because degenerated, they cannot withstand the effects, but fall -"actims to all the accidents of alcoholism, united to those they have inherited. These are — in tender years, terrible convulsions on the least occasion ; later, nervousness of hysteria with all the train of symptoms ; limited intelligence, gross brutal character, and a spirit incapable of anything serious or coherent. The heir to alcoholism is querulous, evil- minded, possessed with a desire to destroy, not capable of receiving a good education ; and his faults increase with * The age at which symptoms of hereditary alcoholism break ont varies. It generally awakes at special periods of physiological changes ; snch as puberty, illness, pregnancy, or at the cessation of the menstrual functions. Sudden and great mental emotion, or even chUl, will sometimes suffice. HEREDITY. 177 his years. If born intelligent, lie may lapse into idiocy or imbecility ; born witli infantile paralysis, lie may die from epilepsy ; or, a hypochondriac, he may become insane, and end his wretched existence in an asylum under the delirium of imaginary persecutions ; if, indeed, he has not been carried to the prisoner's dock for some crime for which he bore little real responsibility.* , . . The conclu- sions are that alcoholism is not extinguished vrith. the drinking individual, but is transmitted to his descendants under various forms, namely, convulsions in infancy, pro- duced by the most trivial causes ; malformation of the head and microcephalus ; tendency to strong drink ; feeble general development ; trembling especially of the upper limbs ; gastric troubles ; epilepsy ; precocious perversity and cruelty ; mental weakness ; idiocy ; tendency to in- sanity or mania." In his address, The Heredity of Alcohol, delivered ^^- Norman before the International Congress for the Study of Alco- holism at Brussels (August, 1880), Dr. Norman Kerr said, " Defective nerve-power and an enfeebled debilitated morale form the favourite legacy of inebriates to their offspi-ing. Some of the circle, generally the daughters, may be nervous and hysterical ; others, generally the sons, are apt to be feeble and eccentric, and to fall into insanity when an unusual emergency takes place. That the impairment of the bodily or mental faculties arises from the intemperance of one or both heads of the family, is demonstrated by the healthfulness and intel- lectual vigour of children born while the parents were temperate contrasted with the sickliness and mental feebleness of their brothers and sisters born after the parent or parents became intemperate. . . . The most dis- tressing aspect of the heredity of alcohol is the transmitted narcotic or insatiable craving for drink — the dipsomania of the physician — which is every day becoming more and more prevalent. Probably the alarming increase of the alcoholic heredity in England is owing in great part to the increase of female intemperance amongst us. It is well to * If a sonnd knowledge of the laws of heredity were a sine qua non qualification in the law-maker, might we not hope that curative measures would supersede the punitive and inaugurate a nobler and more effective moral code than we have ever known ? N 178 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Dr. Lewis D. Mason on alcoholic insanity. Prof. Kraft- Ebing on diseases of alcoholic heredity. state that all the evil resulting from hereditary alcoholism may he transmitted hy parents ivho have never been noted for their drunkenyiess. Long- continued habitual indulgence in intoxicating drinks to an extent far short of intoxication is not only sufficient to originate and hand down a morbid tendency, but is much more likely to do so than even repeated drunken oibthreaks ivith intervals of perfect sobriety between." The hereditary drink-crave is thus described by Dr. Lewis D. Mason in his Alcoholic Insanity (New York, 1883) : " It is an irresistible impulse that drives a person to alcoholic intoxication at stated or irregular periods. The attack is preceded by a condition of melancholia, anorexia, insomnia, and general restlessness. After the debauch, or during it, the special effect of the alcohol on the mental and physical condition becomes manifest — tremor, hallucinations, sleeplessness, coated tongue, loss of appetite, and other symptoms of gastric derangement. The ' ii'resistible impulse ' is the characteristic feature of this special form of monomania. The genesis of that impulse, and the views of vai'ious writers as to its pathological origin, the province of this paper will not permit to touch. " The point to be made here is that the hallucinations and delusions are simply the result of the alcoholic poisoning. " The person again and again yields to the insane impulse until death, either by some intercurrent disease, or disease resulting from his alcoholic excesses, relieves him from his sad heritage." Of the children of parents who are guilty of alcoholic excesses,* Prof. Kraft-Ebing, in his Psychiatrie (Stutt- gart, 1883), says, "They come into the world as idiots, * One of the laws of heredity of the ntmost importauce for parents to consider is that of what I may call lacteal heredity (see chapter IX.), i.e. what the child receives through the medium of the milk, whether the milk of its mother or of a wet nurse. Virtues, vices, physical characteristics, and the effects of habits indulged in during lactation can be transmitted to the child. Thus, even if the child be well-born to start with, it may acquire physical diseases through the milk of a foster-mother. The Pall Mall Gazette for August, 1883, tells the following interesting anecdote bearing on this point : — " The extent to which the chai-acter of an animal can be changed HEREDITY. 179 with hydrocephaloTis or neurotic-convulsive constitutions ; and perisli in early years of convulsions. In those wlio survive, epilepsy, hysteria, mental diseases, and weakness, and exactly the severest forms of .mental impairment are developed out of the morbid constitution of the nerve- centres ; " and he gives the following terrible scheme as to how nature disposes of generations springing from drunkards : — " 1st Generation. — Moral depravity, alcoholic excess. " 2nd Generation. — Drink mania, attacks of insanity, general paralysis. " 3rd Generation. — Hypochondria, melancholia, apathy, and tendencies to murder. "4th Generation. — Imbecility, idiocy, and extinction of family." Thus it is seen that even the transmission of such loathsome diseases as scrofula, tuberculosis, or syphilis is neither so certain nor so permanent and blasting in effects as those transmitted by alcoholism. Moreover, these terrible diseases are in some degree susceptible of remedy, and are localized. But the heredity from alcoholism is chronic, and profoundly attacks the whole being. Were the transmission absolute, that is, were there no by the way in which it is brought up has seldom been more re- markably illustrated than in the case of a sheep, which at present is said by the Kokstaad Advertizer to be a great pet of the magistrate at Matabiele, in South Africa. This sheep, when a lamb, left the flock, attached itself to a Mr. Watson, who gave it to be suckled by his bitch ' Beauty,' a bitch well known here, and was well taken care of by her. When the lamb grew older it was noticed that it would never sleep in any house but Mr. Watson's, and would some- times lie outside the door cuddled up like a watch-dog. The most wonderful thing about him is that as soon as the hotel bell rings for dinner he is sure to be standing by one of the chairs at the top end of the table, and when the owner sits down he will jump with his front paws on his back, letting him know that he wants something to eat, like a dog. He will not touch grass or eat beef, but will gladly eat mutton, soap, candles, and drink coffee and tea with sugar and milk. But " Schaap's " great love is for draught beer. He will lift the can up with his front paws and hold it to his mouth, and drink with such a relish that it can at once be seen he has been led away by bad example. ' Schaap ' is a fine ram, clean fleece, with very wicked eyes. All day he is seen running about with the dogs as one of them, until the bell rings, then off he scampers to the dining-room." 180 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. laws mightier for the preservation of man than those he violates and turns into engines of destruction, the race might ere this have been extinguished. But the children of drinking parents who escape the curse are the excep- tions, and the escape is seldom, if ever, a complete one. Either the mind, the body, or the character, in some bent, formation, or trait, betrays the taint. Selfish and ii-responsible conduct of life minus drink may, and probably sometimes does, produce a similar heredity ; yet it remains true that those who are neither alcoholics themselves, nor the victims of alcoholic parentage, are in the comparison seldom sufficiently blinded to the meaning and duties of Hfe, to waste their physical, moral, and mental resources, and then either heedlessly or deliberately inflict the consequences on their offspring. CHAPTER IX. THERAPEUTICS; OR, ALCOHOL AS A MEDICINE. § 54. As alcohol (the distilled product) originated in the chemists' and physicians' laboratories, thence gradually spread to the homes of the favoured ones in life, and then descended step by step the grades of social life, until its use in drink by civilized man has driven pure water almost out of the list of beverages ; so now there are signs that it is retreating to the laboratory, like the Afreet to his bottle in the Arabian Nights. And let us hope that when alcohol is once driven back to its starting-place, man will be wise enough to seal up the monster for ever. The first medical treatise on the uses of alcohol was one entitled Ueher den Gebrauch und Nutzen des Brannt- weins (Concerning the Use and Utility of Brandy), written by Dr. Michel Schrick, in 1483. During the next hundred years after this date much A sisteenth- and various consideration was given to the subject, and opini'onof more or less clear opinions were formed as to the effect f,'^?^"'-. of alcohol on man ; and by examining some of the views entertained by " Theoricus," a prominent German of the sixteenth century — i.e., about midway between the time of its practical discovery and oui' age, and when it had spread over the whole of Europe — we may be better able to appreciate the changes which medical opinion has undergone between then and now. In the Hollinshed Chronicles (1577), "Theoricus" describes the properties of alcohol in these words : — " It sloweth age, it strengtheneth youth, it helpeth digestion, it cutteth phlegme, it abandoneth melancholic, it relisheth the heart, it lighteneth the mind, it quickeneth the spirits, 182 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. it cm^etli the hydi'opsia, it healetli the strangirrie, it pounces the stone, it expelleth gravel, it puffeth away ventositie ; it keepeth and preserveth the head from whirl- ing, the eyes from dazzling, the tong fi'om lisping, the mouth fi'om snaffling, the teeth fi'om chattering, and the throat from rattling ; it keepeth the weasen from stiffling, the stomach from wambling, and the heart from swelling ; it keepeth the hands fi^om shivering, the sinews from shrinking, the veins from crumbling, the bones fi'om aching, and the marrow fi-om soaking." As we have seen, these diseases, with scores of kindi-ed afflictions, are precisely the fi'uits which the use of alcohol bears in the organism of man, and it would seem as if " Theoiicus " must have been both a wag and a physician. The following are some of the principal testimonies and opinions, marking the progress of medical thought against the indiscriminate use of alcohol in modem times. Dr. isonnan § 55. At the Crystal Palace Jubilee Conference medical (September, 1879), an essay on the Medical History of the history of the Temperance Movement was read by Dr. Norman Kerr. movement. " At no stage in the onward progTess of the temperance movement," said Dr. KeiT, "have representatives of the medical profession ever been wanting. In the early or moderation stage, when the advocacy of tempei'ance reformers was confined to abstinence fi-om ardent spirits, a numerous company of ^sculapians was invariably in the van. " Leaving out of the reckoning altogether the many unstinted commendations of temperance by the early fathers of the healing art, while united temperance effort was yet in the womb of time, from the ranks of the noble profession of medicine emanated graphic expositions of the physical, mental, and moral dangei-s accompanying even limited alcoholic indulgence. "In 1725 Dr. George Cheyne* had issued a second edition of his fii'st work, in which he commends total * "Neither were they ever designed by Nature and its Author for the animal body as nourishment or common drink, and scarce deserve a place in the apothecary's shop ; spirits having made more havock among mankind by far than even gunpowder." — Natural Method of curing Diseases of the Body and Disorders of the Mind, by Dr. George Cheyne (London, 1742). THERAPEUTICS; OR, ALCOHOL AS A MEDICINE. 188 abstinence as the most natural, healthy, and safe mode of living, and condemns moderate di-inking as unhealthy and dangerous. "In 1747 Dr. James wrote, 'Every person who drinks a dram seems to me guilty of a gi'eater indiscretion than if he had set fire to a house ; and for the same reasons cordial waters are the most dangerous furniture for a closet.' Again, ' I cannot forbear admiring the great wisdom of Mohammed, who strictly forbade his followers the use of fermented liquors for better reasons than are generally apprehended.' " Dr. Erasmus Darwin, author of The Botanic Garden (London, 1794), calls wine 'a pernicious luxury in common use, and injuring thousands.' " In 1802 Beddoes pointed out the many dangers attendant on the social and medical use of intoxicating drinks, dwelling on the ' mischief from wine taken con- stantly in moderate quantity,' and emphasizing ' The enfeebling power of small portions of wine, regularly drunk.' " Dr. Trotter, two years later, denounces beer as a ' poisonous morning beverage,' says ' wines strengthen neither body nor mind ; ' and thus writes, ' When wine was first introduced into Great Britain in the thirteenth century, it was confined to the shop of the apothecary.' "Writing to Dr. Joshua Harvey, in 1829, Dr. John Cheyne, Physician- General to the Forces in Ireland, in a letter published in Dublin, contends that the medical profession ' ought to make every retribution in their power for having so long upheld one of the most fatal delusions which ever took possession of the human mind.' "Mr. Higginbottom was probably an abstainer many years before the birth of the movement, and had abandoned the prescription of alcohol as early as 1832." In a letter to a friend, written in 1836, Dr. Higgin- Dr. Higgin- bottom* says, " I consider I shall do more in curing disease th"a™an- * John Higginbottom, F.R.S., of Nottingham, was a keen and able clinical practitioner, who wrote several classical papers on practical medicine. His far-seeing and courageous stand against the medical prescription of alcohol branded him as a maniac, and ostracized him from practice among the higher classes of society. Another man of Like conscience and courage was Mr. James Hawkins, 1S4 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. tagpsofpre- and preventing disease in one year hy prescribing total abstinMce!*^ abstinence, than I could do in the ordinary coiirse of an extensive practice of a hundred years. I have already seen diseases cured hy total abstinence that would not have been cured hy any other means. If all stimulating drinks and tobacco were banished from the earth, it would be a real blessing to society, and in a few weeks they would never be missed, not even as a mediciiie." * Dr. Kerr in Dr. Kerr continues, in his Crystal Palace essay, "The con inuation. ^]jj.gg well-known Declarations concerning alcohol merit special mention. The first was drawn by Mr. Julius Jeffreys in 1839, and was signed by Sir B. Brodie, Sir James Clarke, Sir J. Eyre, Dr. Marshall Hall, Dr. A. T. Thompson, Dr. A. Ure, the Queen's physicians ; Professor Partridge, Professor Quain, Mr. Travers, Mr. Bransby Cooper, and seventy-eight leaders in medicine and siu^gery. This document declared the opinion to be en-oneous that wine, beer, or spirit was beneficial to health ; that man in ordinaiy health required no such stimulant, and could not be benefited by the habitual employment of such in either large or small quantities ; that, even in the most moderate doses, alcoholic drinks did no good, while large quantities (such as by many would be thought modei'ate) sooner or later proved injurious to the human constitution, without any exceptions." First medical The Declaration drawn up by Dr. Julius Jeffreys,t here on839*"°° alluded to, contained the following pai-agi-aphs :— drawn up by "An opinion handed down from rude and ignorant Jeffreys."^ times, and imbibed by Englishmen from their youth, has become very general, that the habitual use of some portion of alcoholic di'ink — as of wine, beer, or spirit — is beneficial to health, and even necessary for those subjected to habitual labour. of 36, Cold Place, Commercial Road, formerly a staff assistant surgeon at the battle of Waterloo. Like Dr. Higginbottom, he was an earnest and consistent abstainer, and at the same cost to his practice. Some valuable papers were contributed by him to the Temperance Intelligencer for 1840 ; and he had the firmness and sincerity to describe himself in the Medical Directory as " Teetotal since 1837." * From Anti-Bacchus, hy the Hev. B. Parsons (London, 1839). The italics are by the Rev. Mr. Parsons. t See Dr. Grindrod's Bacchus (1839). THERAPEUTICS; OR, ALCOHOL AS A MEDICINE. 185 " Anatomy, physiology, and the experience of all ages and countries, when properly examined, must satisfy eveiy mind well informed in medical science that the above opinion is altogether eiToneous. Man in ordinary health, like other animals, requires not any such stimulants, and cannot be benefited by the habitual employment of any quantity of them, large or small ; nor will their use during his lifetime increase the aggi^egate amount of his labour. In whatever quantity they are employed, they rather tend to diminish it. " When he is in a state of temporary debility from illness, or other causes, a temporary use of them as of other stimulant medicines may be desirable ; but as soon as he is raised to his natui^al standard of health, a con- tinuance of their use can do no good to him, even in the most moderate quantities, while larger quantities (yet such as by many persons are thought moderate) do, sooner or later, prove injurious to the human constitution without any exceptions." * "The second Declaration," continues Dr. Kerr, "was Second originated, and the many signatures published, by Mr. declaration John Dunlop in 1847. More than two thousand of the most by Mr. John eminent physicians and surgeons sigTied this, including iJS."^ "* Sir R. Brodie, Sir J. Clarke, Sir W. Burnett, Sir J. Forbes, Sir H. Holland, Sir A. Munro, Sir J. McGrigor, Sir R. Christison, Dr. W. B. Carpenter, Dr. Copland, Dr. Niell Amott, Dr. A. Farre, Professors Guy, Allen, Thomson, Miller, McLeod, Easton, Anderson, McFarlane, Rainey, Buchanan, Paris, Winslow, Alison, Syme, Henderson, Lawi'ie, McKenzie, R. D. Thomson, Couper, and Simpson. This certificate set forth that perfect health is compatible with total abstinence from all intoxicating beverages ; that all such drinks can, with perfect safety, be discontinued either suddenly or gi'adually ; and that total and universal abstinence from alcoholic liquors and intoxicating beverages of all sorts would greatly contribute to the health, the prosperity, the morality, and the happiness of the human race. "The third Declaration, which was prepared by Pro- The third * The Rev. B. Parsons (cp. cit.) says, " To their honour it may be told that five thonsand medical men in America have come forward and given their testimony against alcohonc drinks." 186 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. medical Declaration by Professor Parkes in 1871. Establish- ment of the Quarterly Medical Temperance Journal, 1869. The British Medical Journal concerning alcohol as a medicine (1871). fessor Parkes, on tlie suggestion of Mr. Ernest Hart and Mr. Robert Rae, in 1871, was signed by 269 leading members of the hospital staffs. Among those signing were Sir George Buitows, Sir Thomas Watson, Sir H. Holland, Sir William Fergiisson, Sir James Paget, Sir Ranald Martin, Sir Henry Thompson, Sii' Duncan Gibb, and Sir James Bardsley." The modem scientific temperance movement of England may be said to have commenced with the publication of Dr. F. R. Lees' Is Alcohol a Medicine ? (1866), and to have taken full shape ^ath the establishment of the Quarterly Medical Temperance Journal (1869), at the instance of Mr. Robert Rae, secretary of the I^ational Temperance League. In this quarterly will be found fairly reproduced almost all the best medical literature of the subject that has appeared since 1869. The intelligent advocacy of true temperance in this journal called forth both rejoinders and support in the medical press of Great Britain and other countries, and finally the British Medical Journal, the powerful organ of eleven thousand British physicians, invited an investigation of the drink question. On the 30tli of September, 1871, the British Medical Journal said — " Looking to the ineffable misery and disaster, the waste, degi'adation, suffering, and crime which are con- stantly wrought in this and most civilized nations by drink, we are far from thinking the importance of the subject can be exaggerated. . . . The influence of medical men, if they were united and agi-eed, might be all-powerful on this subject ; and we should be glad to see a conference of medical men, including those of the highest class, originated in some really influential quarters, with a view to giving this subject a more thorough discussion than it has yet had. We should like to hear a discussion in which Parkes, Edward Smith, Hughes Bennett, A. P. Stewart, Paget, Jenner, and some of our leading provincial practitioners, would take pari, in which the whole subject should be probed. To what extent, if at all, are physicians justified in recognizing alcohol as an article of daily food in health ? Does the habit of prescribing alcoholic drinks act injuriously upon the morals and welfare of the people ? THERAPEUTICS; OR, ALCOHOL AS A MEDICINE. 187 Is it possible or desirable to substitute the more enticing forras of alcohol by medicinally and less alluring forms ? We all of us sympathize with the ends which the National Temperance League has in view. A small minority only practically participate in their means of action. Can we in any way, and in what way, help to excuse this nation from the curses which di'ink brings upon its population ? " This was followed by the strong appeal of Dr. A. H. H. McMurtry, of Belfast, in an article On the Duty of Medical Men in Relation to the Temperance Movement {Medical Temperance Journal, October, 1871). "The ignorance of the people," says Dr. McMurtry, Dr.McMur- " encouraged as it has been by the attitude of the medical qTent^ appeal profession towards the temperance movement, with regard *<> ^^.'^ to the nature, properties, and real value of alcoholic drinks, profession has constituted hitherto an almost impregnable barrier to (5*^''"^'*' i^f' • Temperance the progi'ess 01 truth on this subject. . . . Medical practice, journal, Oct. and medical teaching, and perhaps medical science on the ^^^^^' subject altogether, have begotten and fostered the popular belief that alcohol is one of the good creatures of God. The medical profession is responsible for the originating and perpetuating of the great mistake that alcohol is a wholesome thing. . . . The people's medical advisers either teach, by precept and example, that they are not injurious, or manifest an indifference to the evils produced by theii' use, which implies that they do not think them injurious. It matters little whether it is what they teach or what they do not teach that is the cause of the popular belief and popular custom ; for medical men are just as culpable if they do not dispel this error, as if they actually and directly taught it. They are just as responsible for its consequences, because it is their special province and privilege to diffuse that light and knowledge which alone could prevent them. For to whom can the temperance movement look, to whom should it look, for aid in exposing this pernicious falsehood but to the medical profession ? To whom else should a community suffering fi'om the physical consequences of a physical poison appeal, not only for their cure, but for their prevention ? . . . Apart from the absolute duty of every man to abstain from the unnecessary use of a poison, it is pre-eminently the duty of medical men, who are naturally and justly considered 188 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. guides in all that pertains to the preservation of health, to see that the powerful influence of their example is on the side of vii'tue and sobriety. Their superior knowledge of the poisonous nature of alcohol implies a greater obligation to abstain from it ; but it is their stronger and wider influence which, in an especial manner, lays them under a deeper responsibility to set the people a safe example in this matter, and incurs upon them a deeper guilt if their example leads the people astray. . . . Hence I maintain that it is the duty of medical men either (1) to discard alcohol altogether on the strength of the verdict which a large proportion of the profession — not to mention com- petent judges outside the profession — have pronounced against it ; or else (2) to examine the matter for themselves with an earnest and sincere desire to know the truth, considering the incalculable evils which so many truthful, unprejudiced, and thoroughly qualified men attribute solely to the common and medicinal use of alcohol (such use being founded on false notions of the nature and real value of the drink), I hold that it is the bounden duty of all who are in any degree responsible for this use of it, to give the whole subject that honest and attentive consider- ation which its importance demands. This would be a more philosophic, honoui'able, and philanthropic course to pursue than that so often adopted by medical men, of refusing either to study the question for themselves or to be instructed by those who have studied it. I should have thought that, if no other or higher consideration were sufiicient, the honour of their profession would be enough to arouse them to defend it from the serious charge of contributing, either knowingly or in wilful ignorance, to the miseries of the human race. " But suppose that, after having given the subject the necessary investigation, they still believe that alcohol is an indispensable article of the ' Materia Medica,' what then ? What if some medical men have actually done so, and have been forced to the conclusion that alcohol is a useful food and a necessary medicine ? Then I tell them that it is their duty (3) to choose the lesser of two evils. Prescribe alcohol, eitherdieteticallyor medicinally, and you frequently create or resuscitate, and always run a risk of creating or resuscitating, supposing the patient survives, an uncon- therapeutics; or, alcohol as a medicine. 189 trollable and ultimately fatal appetite for intoxicating drink. Thus in your desire to cui-e one disease, which many believe could be cured more certainly and more safely by other means, you administer a remedy which may and often does produce another disease of a much moi"e serious character, inasmuch as it involves not only physical but moral injury to the patient, and untold misery to his fi'iends. You also give rise to, and confirm, that widespread faith in the necessity for and remedial powers of alcoholic liquors, which I have said is at the very basis of the di'inkiug customs, and is the remote origin of the traffic itself and all its evils. For while I do not say that all who drink do so because they think the drink is good for them, I do say that all begin to drink ignorant of the fact, and because they are ignorant of the fact, that alcohol is inherently and essentially bad for them. And this igno- rance is the result of the prescription and recommendation by medical men of the various intoxicating productions of the brewer and the distiller. And remember that the advocates of alcohol can claim no especial advantages for the alcoholic treatment which are not also claimed to a superior degree for the non-alcoholic treatment, by those who have expunged this agent from their list of remedies altogether." Stirred to the quick by these earnest words, Mr. Robert Origin of the Rae, the secretary of the National Temperance League, medical"*"*^ consulted with Mr. Ernest Hart, editor of the British Declaration. Medical Journal, who advised that the counsel of Prof. Parkes, of the Army Medical School, Netley, and other prominent medical men, should be sought with reference to the practicability of such a conference as had been suggested in the British Medical Journal. Dr. Parkes questioned the utility of a conference, and recommended a Declai^tion instead. Mr. Rae urgently requested that he would di^aft such a Declaration as the profession in general would be prepared to sigTi. This was done, when Mr. Rae submitted it without delay to Dr. Buitows, Sir Thomas Watson, Sir James Paget, and Mr. Busk, each of whom suggested a few alterations, which were at once adopted. These four physicians then signed the Declaration ; after which it was presented, at Dr. Burrows' suggestion, * to some of the senior and most 190 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. distinguislied members of the medical profession in London ' for si2:nature." Opinion of the Times as to the im- portance of the third medical Declaration. The Lancet. The Pall Mall Gazette, The Declaration, after being signed by two hundred and sixty-nine leading members of the medical profession, was printed with its full list of signatures in the Times (January 1, 1872), which, in commenting on it three days later, said : — "It is very seldom that a great social question such as that of the limits between a wholesome and safe use of alcohol on the one hand, and injurious excess on the other, evokes such a body of witnesses as that subscribed to the medical protest in our columns. It is impossible not to attach very great value to the deliberate opinion of those who must know a good deal of the subject, and who are not generally given to exaggeration. . . . That two hundred and fifty medical men, including the naost distinguished names in the profession, should have agreed to a manifesto against the excessive and incautious adminis- tration of alcohol, has taken the world rather by surprise, as revealing a certain unsuspected background of actual knowledge and unanimity. Of course there are protests and dissents, but they do not come to much. . . . This famous document, whether it be read with implicit agree- ment or with criticism, is certain to call attention to the histoiy and actual results of alcoholic stimulants wherever there are eyes to see, and reason to understand." " This list of names is very representative," says the Lancet (December 23, 1871). "It is, indeed, so inclusive that a few honoured names which are absent are conspicuous by their absence.* It is so comprehensive that one is sur- prised to miss a particular name that seems necessary to give complete authority to the document." And this from the Pall Mall Gazette has no uncertain sound — " Although there are those who express indignation at * Apropros of these remarks by the Lancet, it is hut fair to recollect that, with the exception of the names of Sir William Gull and Sir William Jennor, it can hardly be said that any conspicuous medical name is absent from this Declaration, and these two physicians were at that time at Sandringham, attending upon the Prince of Wales in his critical illness. THERAPEUTICS; OR, ALCOHOL AS A MEDICINE. 191 the assumption that alcohol is ever prescribed inconsider- ately in large quantities, or that sufficient care is not always taken to cut it oS at the right moment and to arrest subsequent habits of induced tippling, there are too many well-known examples of habitual evil induced by medical prescription to ruake us hesitate to accept the Declaration in its eveiy word and in all its meanings." The Declaration read as follows : — "As it is believed that the inconsiderate prescription The wording of large quantities of alcoholic liquids by medical men for medlca'i "^*^ theii' patients has given rise, in many instances, to the Declaration, formation of intemperate habits, the undersigned, while unable to abandon the use of alcohol in the treatment of certain cases of disease, are yet of opinion that no medical practitioner should prescribe it without a sense of gi^ave responsibility. They believe that alcohol, in whatever form, should be prescribed with as much care as any powerful di'ug, and that the dii*ections for its use should be so framed as not to be interpreted as a sanction for excess, or necessarily for the continuance of its use when the occasion is past. " They are also of opinion that many people immensely exaggerate the value of alcohol as an ai'ticle of diet, and since no class of men see so much of its ill effects, and possess such power to restrain its abuse, as members of their own profession, they hold that every medical practitioner is bound to exert his utmost influence to inculcate habits of great moderation in the use of alcoholic liquids. " Being also fu'mly convinced that the gi^eat amount of drinking of alcoholic liquors among the working classes of this country is one of the greatest evils of the day, destroy- ing — more than anything else — the health, happiness, and welfare of those classes, and neutralizing, to a large extent, the great industrial prosperity which Providence has placed within the reach of this nation, the undersigned would gladly support any wise legislation which would tend to restrict, within proper limits, the use of alcoholic beverages, and gi^adually introduce habits of temperance." Though couched in terms less complete and uncom- General im- promising than some desired, this document was yet " far duc?d°on the' in advance of social sentiment and popular practice," and public mind 192 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. by the publi cation of it. Medical opinions evoked by the publica- tion of the third Decla- ration. Dr. Henry Munroe. it raised sucli a storm of discussion within the medical profession, and led to such controversy in the daily press, as made it famous almost ere the ink of it was dry, and the animated dispute of which it was the nucleus did not subside until some of the keenest intellects, ripest ex- perience, and, fortunately, some of the noblest consciences in and outside the medical profession, had wheeled into line and spoken words which advanced the whole temper- ance reform movement in the hearts and conviction of the people, as almost nothing else could have done.* In the great medical meeting in Exeter Hall (January 30, 1872), Dr. Henry Munroe, of Hull, said— " Forty years ago we used to bleed — or rather, I should say, ' phlebotomize ' — every one. I have sat at the table of a hospital forty years ago, and when I have seen prescribed * At about this time there were revivals of the temperance movement in other countries. Some six hundred of the physicians of Holland issued this medical Declaration, even more stringent than the English one : — "1. The moderate use of strong drinks is always unhealthy, even when the body is in healthy condition. It does not do any good to the digestion, but even interferes with that process ; for strong drinks can only temporarily increase the feeling of hunger, but not in favour of digestion, after which strong reaction must follow, and evils which are usually attributed to other causes, but often result from the habitual use with moderate drinkers. " 2. The assertions that intoxicating drinks used moderately are naturally innocent means of cheering up — that they are useful in severe colds — or that they are with labouring men equivalents for insufficient nourishment — or useful in misty and humid air — or for people obliged to work in the water — or a protection against con- tagious diseases — are without any foundation, and contradictory to experience and to human reason ; and the habitual use of the same has therefore an unhealthy effect, and an influence unlike what people expect from them. " 3. The habitual use of strong drinks works most perniciously on all diseases, and especially on consumption. " 4. Regarded as the usual drink of all classes, they are not only improper on account of the above reasons, but also against moral development and material prosperity, in such measure as to be con- eidered and to be stamped as the greatest underminers of the actual welfare of mankind." In 1872 America manifested her sympathy with the movement, and in May of that year, at the twenty-third annual meeting of the American Medical Association — about one thousand members being present — a resolution to discourage the use of alcohol in medical practice was unanimously carried. THERAPEUTICS; OR, ALCOHOL AS A MEDICINE. 193 ' blue pill at night, and black draught in the morning,' I have known what was going to be the next question. The next question would be, ' Have you any pain anywhere ? ' And woe to the patient if he said he had, or if even he thought he had. The next line would be certain to be Venesectio ad uncias duodecim ('bleeding to twelve ounces ') . I have seen that repeated a dozen times in one morning when I was a pupil, upon all sorts of persons, of all ages, of all sizes, and of both sexes. A reaction took place in the profession. We gave up the lancet, as we found that people living in cities and towns were not always labouring under inflammatory diseases. What we are labouring under now is debility. Everything is debility now. We went to the other extreme — therefore brandy became the elixir vitce, the sole panacea for all the ills that flesh is heir to. If a man were in collapse, brandy relieved him ; if in the agony of colic, why, brandy revived him ; if life was bui'ning out in fever, brandy cooled him ; and if he was starved to death, why, brandy warmed him. In fact, brandy was the pet drug of the Pharmacopoeia. Every- thing else dwindled into obscurity. I will give you some of my reasons for discontinuing the treatment of disease with alcohol. I don't like to talk of myself, but I can tell you that I have had twenty attacks of gout dimng the last twenty years ; if that doesn't make a man wiser I don't know what vsdll. During the first ten years of this period I had sixteen attacks lasting from seven days to four weeks ; but during the last ten years, since I abandoned the use of alcoholic liquors in any shape whatever, I have only had four attacks, two of them through accidents, and the other two very mild, lasting only a few days. I have tried brandy and water, I have tried beer, and I have tried wine, and the whole category of such things, and I have ascertained how much of each of them it vrill take to induce an attack, and I have published these experiments in the Medical Journal and need not repeat them to-night. I determined to discontinue the use of such liquors, and have been much more successful in practice ever since. I ceased also to order any more for my patients, and they are better too. In Hull, in the year 1849, we had the cholera very bad indeed. It ravaged amidst us fearfully. Above two thousand persons were buried in our cemetery, o 194 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. victims of this disease. I saw at least one hundred persons a day in that dreadful disease, and most of those who died were fi^om thirty to forty years of age. We tried the brandy-and-opium treatment, and that was a failure. Altogether we lost somewhere about forty or fifty per cent, of the persons attacked by the stimulant treatment and with opium. One medical man thought that the opium with the bi-andy was not strong enough (something like Mr. Skey), so he ordered that very strong doses of cam- phine mixture should be administered, and he pledged his reputation that this would cure any case of cholera, but I believe it was a failure. The cholei'a took off nearly all the drunkards. People whom I have seen intoxicated at my surgery in the morning were dead the same night, and buried the next morning. It was a fearful thing. I rememher six cases of persons who were so obstinate as to refuse to take any doctors' stuff or brandy. I wrapped them up in blankets sprinkled with t^irpentine and left them. Four out of that six are tvalking about now. They recovered, but we lost fifty per cent, of the others. Tui-ning to fever — I have tried alcohol in fever, and I have treated fever without alcohol ; and my ex- perience is that we lose five per cent, in treating cases of fever without alcohol, and twenty-five per cent, with alcohol. It is the experience of workhouses and hospitals that one patient in ten of those treated loith brandy for fever died ; but of those treated ivithout brandy only one death in thirty cases occurred. I have treated many cases of delirium tremens, and I have given alcoholic liquors heroically, but had many deaths during that treatment ; but ivhen the patients were isolated and cut off from all spirits and liquors, I have never lost a case. It is a rare thing to lose a man under such treatment. In i-egard to hgemorrhage and violent floodings, I remember a case of this kind in which I bad to sit up the whole night to give brandy, and religiously gave it to the lady, and I have gone home in the moniing with the reflection, ' What a wise provision it is that we have such an excellent thing as brandy always at hand ! ' I tried the case next time without brandy, and the lady sooner got better, and there was no secondary fever, and her remark was, ' I shall never try brandy again.' I could go on multiplying these illustrations, but THERAPEUTICS; OR, ALCOHOL AS A MEDICINE. 19; I must not tire you. With regard to the indiscriminate use of alcohol, this ' Declaration ' says, it is ' believed ' it has a tendency to promote the formation of habits of intemperance. It seems singular, but I believe it to be true, and it is a great sorrow to me now to think of, that for twenty years I made many families unhappy. I believe I have made many drunkards, not knowingly, not pur- posely, but I recommended them to drink. It makes my heart ache, even now, to see the mischief that I have made in years gone by, mischief never to he remedied by any act of mine. But in this respect at least I do not sin now, and have not done so for the last ten years. I do not take intoxicating drink myself, and I do not have it in my house, and I do not give it to anybody else." Dr. J. J. Ritchie, of Leek, said (in the same meeting), Dr. j. j. " In my practice I have given no stimulants in fever for '^'^ "^' years. I have never, so far as I remember, for ten or twelve years, lost a single patient from typhoid fever, and never given a single drop of stimulant therein." The venerable Dr. Jno. Higginbottom, of N"ottingham, Dr. Higgin- in a letter to the Times, dated January 12, 1872, referring ^°t*o™- to this Declaration, said — " I was educated in the opinion that alcohol was abso- lutely necessary in the treatment of disease, and for the first twenty years of my practice I gave it to my patients, but for the last forty I have discontinued it altogether, not having once prescribed it as a medicine. As early as 1813 I discontinued port wine in typhus fever (the term typhoid was not come into use as a distinction at that early pei-iod) , afterwards in English cholera, uterine heemorrhage, delirium tremens, and in cases of exhaustion and sinking. In the year 1827 I had lost all confidence in alcohol as a medicine, from a conviction of its inefficiency, and also from its very dangerous qualities. It is not necessary to enter into the details of my practice, as I have given them to my medical brethren in the Lancet and British Medical Journal. In August, 1862, I had a paper read before the British Medical Association, in London, on the non-alcoholic treatment of disease. " The result of my non-alcoholic treatment is, that acute disease is much more readily cured, and chronic disease more manageable. I have not known of any 10 1 T 1 ii T 1 ^ lemperance With results or a reduced death-rate among both mothers Hospital. and live-born children. But opposition, chiefly by sub- scribers interested in the liquor trade, became so great as to render continuance of this effort impracticable. About two years later, however, a meeting, consisting practically of those who had been thus handicapped at the British Lying-in Hospital, was held at the National Temperance League Rooms, and a committee was formed to further the establishment in London of a General Temperance Hospital. A temporary hospital was begun at 112, Gower Street, which had only sixteen beds, but such success was the result, that a fine freehold site was subsequently taken upon the Hampstead Road, and one block, containing fifty-two beds, was erected. An aged gentleman who has been deeply impressed with the results of its work, and is anxious to see the hospital completed before his death, has placed some £10,000 at the disposal of the Board, and a second wing is now being erected (April, 1884). These blocks will raise the number of beds to about one hundred and twenty, while a large outdoor department will be in operation. The plan includes also a school and institute for temper- ance nurses, and a full medical school for medical practi- tioners, for which adjoining portions of land are obtainable. The Board of Management in its last report, May, 1883, proved this experiment to have been a success. " At the present time," says this report, " not only are men of distinction ready to admit the value of the principle, with few limitations, but the medical oSicers of various public institutions are applying it more or less completely, and with a success which insures its widening adoption. . . . The practical conclusion points to such a generous support p 210 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. of the Temperance Hospital, and such completion of its scheme, as will keep its work prominently before the public eye, and will lend the weight of its experience and authority to a more general exclusion of alcohol from the medical treatment of the sick." And the following summary* of the results of cases treated from the beginning in 1873 up till the last of April, 1883 (nine years and seven raonths) certainly com- pares favotu'ably with the reports issued by hospitals where alcohol is still used as a medicine. In-patients. Cured ... ... ... ... ... 953 Believed ... ... ... ... 683 Died ... ... ... ... ... 77 Under treatment (April 30th, 1883) ... ... 52 Total number admitted ... ... 1765 It thus appears that during the ten years the total number of patients admitted to the beds of the hospital was 1765. If we deduct from this number the 62 then still under treatment in the hospital, there will be left 1713 completed cases. Among these the 77 deaths make a mortality of rather less than 4"5 per cent. Foui' and a half per cent, is an extremely low mortality. The cases include successful operations of Caesarian section, ovari- otomy, lithotomy, amputations of thigh, etc., removal of large cancerous tumours, and all the ordinary medical and surgical cases which come under treatment in a London general hospital. Part of this success is due to the dis- tinction of its medical staff, to the model character of the hospital, and to the devoted ladies who superintend the nursing. But a large part of the success is undoubtedly due to the fact that alcohol is practically disused. The * Owing to the courtesy of Mr. C. E. Dumbleton, house surgeon at the London Temperance Hospital, I am able to subjoin a continua- tion of this table, up to March 15, 188-± : — Cured ... ... ... ... ... 1265 Believed ... ... ... ... ... 809 Died ... ... ... ... ... 105 Under treatment ... ... ... ... 51 Total number admitted ... ... 2230 THERAPEUTICS; OR, ALCOHOL AS A MEDICINE. 211 visiting physicians and surgeons are in no way tied with regard to the use of alcohol, if they deem it desirable to use it as a medicine. It is only stipulated that in the event of any such exceptional case, they fully report the naatter to the Board. As a matter of fact, alcohol has only been used in one or two experimental cases, during these ten years, and in these cases without beneficial results. As an article of food and as a pharmaceutical vehicle, the use of alcohol is formally excluded from the hospital. The following table, in extenso, of all the cases of typhoid fever treated in the beds of the London Temper- ance Hospital, up to December 31, 1883, is taken from the Medical Temperance Journal (April, 1884). (It will be seen that the total mortality is a little over eleven per cent.) 212 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH, ^ ^ X Q H ": 1^ .a a! It ""I si Usual cour.se of symptoms. Excellent recovery. Severe case. Complicated with broncbo-pneumonia. In very critical state when admitted. Temperature 104°. Ordinary case. Admitted in extremely pro- strate state. Symptoms in- dicative of severe typhoid. Serious congestion of both lungs. Severe intestinal bitmorrbage. I'urulent stools. Fourteen evacu- ations during one night. Recovery rapid and com- plete. Severe case. Complicated with pneumonia. Extreme prostration. Bowels moved seventeen and eighteen times a day. Ilieraorrhage from boweLs. Highe.'itteniperaturel04°'2. Good recovery. 3 1 1 > o 1 : £ : 1 = : ..... >■ >; fc^ -s c5 " M S 3 g r- *-: ^^ *^ a c .2 '^ S3 •a S t-.* Q 1 s •0 3 a . § ■ s § s a . tJ a hj « " o" § fi o p a 1 c £| c2 3S-2 i S xi a ■^ <, ^ fe -^ a 111 ^ 1 ■g §5 ^-S >.f ^ THERAPEUTICS; OR, ALCOHOL AS A MEDICINE. 213 r^ .S c 2 "g >>''' V ^ e3 ^ ffi 0) c ^ M a ^- ■ci; "d-F 2 !., I" >0 ^OO St>6 ocXx_oo„x_»_»^ao o J c5 C X 1 s p. 01 gl , oS > c X X o Z C-l > o X c X ^ C<1 _^ M li s" -3 C ""2 ""S S ~ '^ 5 '^ '^ 2 £ •e ^ on '"3' -n ^ '^ e» -^ « "■' '^ '^ OT *"* « '^ a) « m ^ m rq to CO m ^^ lO •^ o ^ u> •AJ ^ -* U3 12 1^ lO CO - c^ m •^ ^ o ^ ^ ^ o CI M CO ^ M , II ■2 « a* Severe case. Patient phthisi- cal. Highest temperature 105°-2. Recovery Blow but complete. Suffering from an ovarian cyst. Profuse intestinal ha'morrhage. Ordinary case. Highest tem- perature I05°-2. Ordinary case. Highest tem- perature 104°-4. Ordinary case. Highest tem- perature 105°. Severe case. Complicated with pneumonia of right lung. Highest tempera- ture 106°. Active delirium. Ordinary case. Highest tem- perature 104°-8. Highest temperature 104°4. About eleven evacuations o t-i 3 Is t- 2 Highest temperature 105°. Relapsed case. Admitted in prostrate condition. Higli- est temperature 103'^'6. Frequent evacuations. An old drinker. Had cir- rhosisof liver, of whioli she died. After convalescence from typhoid. (I'ost-nior- tera examination niailc) Relapsed case. Admitted in a prostrate condition. Patient exhil)itcd marked physical signs of phtliisis, *>"* made a good recovery. 3 V -a V > .2>rr: i: 8 Q§ = = ' 1 I S 3 S S 2 c a m .2 S ►J ... a J a . >3 f o 1 o 1° fe fe S fe .9 .E .2 .S S 3 S S 3 a S t i S 2 2 3 i § « § S 0>O 0)03 i c^ -» o in """"" """"" - ■" 11^ o o -■ ct m -r la lo r~ CO CO cocococo coco s CO -* ■>» '^ il therapeutics; or, alcohol as a medicine. 215 ciSi-l "ill,, gi^^i-^ >:3)- !>. |5=,rs£^o|^l 5:.2o2'-'3"-S3 OSS'" ~.s ^Pi?H = s^-Soj>--5 ii£-S-2« . o S 6 OS "^s^ ^ I JS o s 5 S fe «^ ■< S ai cc W '« ^ a 3 2 S s CO -* X «■ s ^ °g CJ D M CJ n ■^ ss ta 216 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Dr. It will be seen that the mortality of this long series of Edmunds's cases is verv much less than usual. As to his own statement J . regarding methods of treatment, Dr. Eiclmunds wintes : — onhenon-^'^ " 1. I have prescribed no alcohol, and I have a strong alcoholic conviction that in typhoid fever, as a general rtde, alcohol the London is not Only not necessary, but that it is actually injurious. Temperance j^g effect, when given in large doses, of lowering the temperature is obtained more safely and more easily by tepid sponging, the wet pack, simple diaphoretics — such as the acetate of ammonia, moderate doses of citrate of potash. On the other hand, reduction of temperatui^e, when obtained by the large doses of alcohol which are necessary, is followed by increased distaste for food, less perfect digestion, and greater intestinal suffering. The use of alcohol, also, in my opinion, predisposes to the occui'rence both of intestinal liEemorrhage and of that fatal complication — perforation of the intestine. "2. I never feed my patients ' solely with cold milk.' I always use more or less of well-boiled gruel, made from fine clean oatmeal ; and, generally, I use a mixture of two parts of thin gruel and one part of fresh new milk ; the milk being added direct to the gruel as soon as this is completely cooked, and thus becoming scalded but not boiled. "3. In cases of haemorrhage from the intestine, I never select lead, but always turpentine, in thirty-drop doses given upon loaf sugar, or shaken up in milk, and repeated eveiy few houi^s. " 4. In troublesome dian'hoea I give opium only as an exceptional remedy. Covering" the abdomen with a hot wet flannel and waterproof covering seems to me to relieve the pain and tenderness better than the administration of opium. " 5. I always prescribe some daily dose of fresh fruit, such as grape-juice, or fresh lemon-juice in sweetened barley-water as a di'ink to be taken at the patient's dis- cretion. Some such fresh vegetable element is much longed for by the fever patient, and can generally be so administered as not to increase the diarrhoea. The haemorrhage, which so frequently occurs in typhoid, I believe to be often due to having overlooked this necessity for fresh vegetable juices. In all long illnesses, if fresh THERAPEUTICS ; OR, ALCOHOL AS A MEDICINE. 217 vegetable juices are not regularly administered, there arises a purpurous tendency which predisposes to irrepressible haemorrhage, and to extension of vilcei'ation. " No alcohol has been administered, either dietetically, pharmaceutically, or medicinally, in any one of the cases of typhoid fever admitted to the Temperance Hospital, and my medical colleagues and myself are perfectly satisfied with our results." * § 59. A consideration of paramount importance in con- The effects nection with the question of alcohol as a medicine, is that aicohoron" of its effects on mothers and their offspi'ing dui'ing preg- mothers and nancy and lactation. For England, indeed, it is a question spring a of the gravest moment to her future independence. Owing- question of T ■ n T p T cc /~i >x- «jii • paramount chiefly to the fatal Grrocers Licences Act, there is more importance, drinking among the women of England to-day than among the women of any other civilized country. With the gi'owth of this evil, in secret until its dimensions have stripped it of secresy, there has grown up a notion fostering the evil, and in turn fostered by it, that intoxicating liquors are especially beneficial to women during pregnancy and lacta- tion ; and I wish, therefore, in this chapter to draw par- ticular attention to this part of the subject. In chapter viii. it was pointed out that certain and terrible consequences befel the children and children's children of transgressing parents, and that the shocking results of alcoholic heredity were doubly certain when the mother was the drinker. But as nothing can be of more importance than the proper beginning of life, and as it is proven that nothing artificial does it greater general harm than alcohol, I quote here important medical testimony on this point dating from the opening of the present century. Dr. Thomas Trotter, in his Essay on Drunkenness -^ Thomas (London, 1804), says, "Drink containing ardent spirits, Trotter on such as ^ane, punch, caudle ale, porter, must impreg-nate ^ ^°"^ ' the milk, and thus the digestive organs of the babe must be quickly injured. These must suffer in proportion to * " At a meeting of the Manchester and Salford Temperance Union, Dr. Meacham said he was medical officer of health for the largest district in England, and no fewer than 49,000 patients had been under his care. For fourteen years he had not prescribed alcohol." — Temperance Review, March 6, 1884. 218 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. the delicacy of their texture, and the diseases which flow from this source are certainly not uncommon ... it is well known that nurses are in the practice of giving spirits in the form of punch to young children to make them sleep. . . . Such children are known to be dull, drowsy, and stupid, bloated in the countenance, with eyes inflamed, subject to sickness at stomach, costive and pot-bellied. The body is often covered with eruptions, and slight scratches are disposed to ulcerate." Sir Anthony In 1814 Sir Authony Carlisle said, " Of all errors in the same. ^^^ emplo}Tnent of fermented liquors, that of giving them. to children seems to be fraught with the worst consequences. The next in the order of mischief is theii" employment by nurses, and which I suspect to be a common occasion of dropsy of the brain in young infants. I doubt much whether the future moral habits, the temper and intel- lectual propensities, are not greatly influenced by the early effects of fermented liquors upon the brain and sensorial organs." Dr. Roschon In The Abuse of Intoxicating Liquors (Tiibingen, 1839), aic-^ohoi*° Dr. Rosch, after condemning the custom of giving wine during to women in childbirth, says, " Many diseases of children owe their origin to the mother's use of spirituous liquors while nui'sing." Dr. Grindrod Dr. Grindrod {Bacchus, London, 1839) says — " Alcoholic liquors propel the organs of nutrition and lactation to increased action, but it is an action unnatural and injuinous in its effects. The organs employed in these important functions are regulated by laws on the due performance of which depends the fulfilment of Nature's intentions. Thus, for example, nutritious food forms the only natural stimulant for the healthy action of the stomach, and is the sole fountain of pure blood. Pure milk, which is essential to the health of the child, depends upon proper digestion. If the functions of the stomach act imperfectly, the secretion of milk must, as a necessary consequence, be defective. Hence whatever dei'anges the functions of the stomach interferes with the healthy lactation. The influence of alcoholic liquors on lactation may be considei-ed in several points of view. In the first place they interfere with healthy digestion. In this way the quality of the milk secreted becomes deterioiuted in on the same. THERAPEUTICS; OR, ALCOHOL AS A MEDICINE. 219 exact proportion to the amoimt of injuiy inflicted on the organs of nutrition. In the second place they influence the quantity of the secretion. The vessels employed in this function, urged on by an alien impulse, produce an unusual and enlarged supply. It does not follow, however, that an increase in the amount of secretion is attended with a proportionate increase in the quantum of nutriment. The contrary is often the case. Milk may be secreted in large quantities ill calculated to supply the ends of nature. Hence numbers of puny emaciated children, the offspring of parents who indulge in strong drink." In his lectures on Tlie Physiological Operation of Alcohol Dr. E. G. (1862), Dr. E. G. Figg, in speaking- of the infant before f^fftf '^* birth and during lactation, says, " No one conversant alcohol pro- with the principle of foetal nutrition will feel disposed to pregnancy"^ controvert the opinion that the placenta is not only a lung and lactation, to the unbom infant, but a digestive system, performing the duty of the latter, by assuming at once the ofiice of the stomach, an excreting intestine, a mesenteric gland, and an assimilative organ. Independently of imparting oxygen to the foetal blood in minute quantities, not adequate to its perfect arterialization, and taking up sustenance for it, the placenta removes impurities returned from the foetal body ; not as the stomach does in the un- digested material, nor as chyle, like the thoracic duct, but in the maturely elaborated substance, transferred by exosmose in a manner incomprehensible, inasmuch as the membranous parieties of the placental cells appear to the microscope impermeable to matter in a form so gi'oss as atoms of fibrine. " Whatever doubt may exist as to the modus operandi, there is none whatever as to the fact ; of which any one may convince himself bj examination of the surface of every third or foui'th placenta delivered, which will be found coated with ossific deposits of carbonate and phos- phate of lime, which substances being in the foetal depart- ment of that organ, could have reached it only thi'ough the maternal cell-walls. The cows in the cotton districts of England, when fed on the refuse of madder and other vegetable dye stuffs, invariably stain the bones of the calf ante partum. Experience, however, does not favour the idea that the placenta exercises a selective discretion in 220 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. appropriating that whicli may be ultimately available in the infant frame, for the placenta receives and circulates any poison or virus that may be presented in the maternal system. An infant in utero is often affected with variola, contemporaneously or immediately consecutive to the coui'se of the disease in the mother. I have attended a patient in Asiatic cholera, and a week later delivered her of a dead foetus, in which the characteristic slate colour infallibly indicated the cause of dissolution. " These facts, even in a theoretical aspect, are quite sufficient to establish the rationality of the proposition that the alcohol swallowed by the pregnant mother must act injui'iously on the child, not merely indirectly, by rendering the material transfeiTed thi-ough the placenta unfit for incorporation with the foetal tissues, but directly, by affecting the nervous system of the foetus, just as it does that of the mother. " I may, in addition, appeal to the stethoscopic exami- nation of two pregnant women. Dui-ing the progi'ess of intoxication, though of course not synchronous, I found that whenever the mother's pulse was excited, so was the infant's heart. When the pulse of the parent, in a more advanced stage, became full and round, the beat of the heart in the child assumed a similar character ; and when feeble and compressible in collapse, the heart of the foetus was scarcely audible. What inference could be di'awn from the cii'cumstances, but that when the mother got drunk, the child got drunk ; when the mother became insensible, the child became insensible ; and when the mother was collapsed, the child was so also ? Every midwife is acquainted with the effect produced on the majority of healthy fceti, if the cold hand be suddenly placed over the maternal hypogastric region. The infant, influenced by a kind of instinctive con- sciousness, springs from its position, imparting a sensible impulse to the practitioner's hand through the uterine parieties and intervening muscles, thus yielding as good a test of the viable condition of the child as the stethoscope could give. In one of the women I never could excite these movements duinng her di'inking fits, though in the other eminently present in the incipient stage of intoxica- tion, but not producible after. I attended another, who THERAPEUTICS ; OR, ALCOHOL AS A MEDICIXE. 221 dated the death of her infant from an act of excess. The child never moved subsequently to her intoxication, and the premonitory symptoms of labour occun'cd in eight days. " In nursing mothers we have the same routine of mani- festations, with a very slight vai-iation in the preliminary circumstances. The breast here supersedes the placenta as the paramount organ in Nature's regards. The nutritious extracts fi'om the food replenish in the first instance this repository of the infant's support, the maternal economy (at this crisis a less important consideration) receiving only the surplus contributions fi^om the digestive system. So thoroughly insufficient is the mother's alcoholized system for the double task of maintaining herself and progeny, that we are waiTanted in placing the prosperity of the infant in juxtaposition with that of the parent. If the child becomes robust the mother becomes emaciated ; vice versa, a robust, plethoric mother almost always insures a cadaverous, debilitated infant. In asserting that the essence of the food passes at once to the breast, without adoption by the maternal tissues, I advance a theory con- sistent with all analogy. If a cow be fed on tui-nips, she imparts the peculiar odour of that vegetable to her milk. The action of a drastic j)urgative taken by the mother is established in the infant at the breast. Thi'ough the same medium the dysentery in the mother is transfen^ed to her child, commencing in aphtJious ulceration of the mouth, extending by continuity thi^ough the whole in- testinal canal, and resulting in the characteristic dis- charges. So I have seen the disease aiTested in both by the astringent principle of the opiates administered to the parent, acting simultaneously and keeping the infant in a somnolent condition. In this country, among the lower classes, a glass of spirit tahen by the 'mother is a popular and often effectual remedy for the tormina (gi'ipes, colic) of an infant. We can guess at the quantity which finds its way to the breasts by the effect. If the child be fed fi'om a cup, a large teaspoonful of spii'it is often added to a single meal, even when the recipient is not more than a week old, that quantity being barely sufficient for the purpose. This fact affords at least an approximate standard for calculatipn as to the proportion of alcohol 222 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. in each glass of spirit wliicli reached the infant after con- sumption by the mother; and is, therefore, an excellent rule for ascertaining the quantity passed through the infant's system when the mother is habitually dissipated, or perhaps erroneously attempts to relieve the mental depression or corporeal exhaustion incidental to lactation by an occasional glass. My acknowledgments are due to Dr. Mackenzie, for his kindness in analyzing to the best of his ability two specimens of milk sent by me for that pui'pose, which were obtained fi'om nui\sing mothers, of nearly the same age, of the same social i-ank, and three months after parttu'ition. One was a temperate woman in robust health, and substantially fed, whose milk con- stituted the only sustenance of her cliild. The other was an emaciated di-inker whose infant presented a miniatui-e of herself. Milk of temperate mother. Milk of drinking mother. Salts 8-50 Salts 5-50 Casein ... ... 30 Casein Oil 7-50 Oil Water 81-0 Water Alcohol 20 6-5 840 20 1000 1000 Dr. E.Smith ^ ^^s Practical Dietary (London, 1865), Dr. Edward on the use Smith gives like testimony in these words: "Alcohols during lacta- are largely used by many persons in the belief that they tion. support the system and maintain the supply of milk for the infant ; but I am convinced that this is a serioii^s error, and is not an unfreqxLent cause of fits and emaciation in the child." Dr. James In his paper on Alcoholic Drinlis as an Article of Diet ^"diet'^for" f^^ Nursing Mothers (Medical Temperance Journal, July, nursing 1870), Dr. Edmunds, then senior physician to the British mot era. Lying-in Hospital, thus puts this matter : — " The masti- cation, digestion, and primaiy assimilation of the sucking infant's food is thrown upon the mother's organs ; but the tissues of the child are nourished precisely as are the tissues of the mother, and a nursing mother requires simply to digest a larger supply of wholesome and appropriate food. As a matter of course mothers with imperfect teeth or weak stomachs cannot perform the THERAPEUTICS; OR, ALCOHOL AS A MEDICINE. 223 digestion of extra food for tlie infant so well as those mothers who have an abundance of reserve power in their digestive apparatus, and with such patients the question arises, how are they to make up for the deficiency which they soon experience in the supply of milk ? They should assist their digestive apparatus as much as possible by securing an abundance of suitable and nutritious food, prepared in the best way and as is most digestible, while they should lessen the demands of their own system by the avoidance of bodily fatigue and mental excitement. These means, aided by that philosophical hygiene which is at all times essential to the preservation of pure and perfect health, will enable them to supply a maximujn quantity of pui^e and wholesome milk; further calls by the child require proper artificial food. Unfortunately such advice fails to satisfy many anxious mothers, who refuse to admit or believe that they are less robust or less capable than other ladies of their acquaintance, and such mothers fall easy victims to circulars vaunting the nourish- ing properties of ' Hoare's Stout,' ' Tanqueray's Gin,' or Gilbey's ' strengthening Port,' cii'culars which are always backed up by the example and advice of lady friends, who themselves have acquired the habit of using these liquors, and who view as a reproach to themselves the practice of any other lady who may not keep them in countenance as the perfection of all moral and physical propriety. It is a matter of common observation that a glass of spirit taken at bedtime by a nursing mother, not merely increases the flow of milk during the night, but causes the child to sleep heavily. Under these circum- stances the spii'it acts, not as a purgative, nor as a diuretic, nor as a diaphoretic, nor does much of it pass off by the lungs, but it acts as a lactagogue, because the breasts are then in a state of great activity, and form the readiest channel through which the mother's system can eliminate the alcohol. In order to effect that elimination the breasts have to discharge a prof user quantity of milk; but the increased quantity of milk is produced by a mere addition of alcohol and water, or it is produced by impoverishing and straining the system of the mother. In either case the poisonous influence of the alcohol is manifested in narcotizing the child, and it cannot need much reflection 224 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. to show that claildren ought not to have alcohol filtered into them as receptacles for matters which the mother's system finds it necessary to eliminate. Probably nothing could be worse than to have the very fabric of the child's tissues laid down from alcoholized blood." Dr. Edmunds Of the effects of beer-drinking, he says, ' I have f'jithe special observed the following facts : — The mothers frequently beer-drink- make flesh, and even become corpulent ; often, however, at lactation ^ the Same time they get pale, and where they are not con- stitutionally robust in fibre they become inactive, short- breathed, coarse-complexioned, nervous, and irritable, and suffer fi'om weakness of the heart and a long train of symptoms which are more or less severe according to the constitution of the mother and the quantity of alcohol she imbibes. The young mother prematurely loses the bloom and beauty of youth. Often it is quite startling to meet some lady, who dnring an interval of two years has been transformed from a sprightly and charming young woman into an uninteresting coarse-looking matron. She has nursed her first infant for twelve months. With a pure and rational diet, she would simply have acquired a more dignified and womanly bearing, with a robuster gentleness of manner ; but a liberal supply of ' nourish- ing ' stout, a glass of port at luncheon, and a little gin- and-water at bedtime, one after the other were adopted, and imbibed regularly, in order to supply her infant TN^ith ' milk.' The presence of a nerveless apathy, or unin- telligent irritability, afterwards proved that a liberal supply of ' stimulants ' was required to support her strength, and, although she ceased nursing, her own sensa- tions convinced her of the necessity of continuing them. The outward and visible change is but an exponent of the degenerations and diseases which are taking root within. If there be a predisposition to insanity or consuruption, these diseases are developed very rapidly, or they are brought on where proper management might altogether have tided over those periods of life at which the predis- position is prone to become provoked into actual disease. " Infants nursed by mothers who drink much beer also become fatter than usual, and to an untrained eye some- times appear as ' magnificent children.' But the fatness of such children is not a recommendation to the more know- THERAPEUTICS; OR, ALCOHOL AS A MEDICINE. 225 ing observer ; they are exceedingly prone to die of inflam- mation of the chest (bronchitis) after a few days' illness from an ordinary cold. They die very much more fre- quently than other children of convulsions and diarrhoea while cutting their teeth, and they are very liable to die of scrofulous inflammation of the membranes of the brain, commonly called " water on the brain," while their child- hood often presents a painful contrast — in the way of crooked legs and stunted or ill-shapen figure — to the ' magnificent and promising appearance of their infancy.' " And Dr. Harrison Branthwaite, in his first annual Dr. Branth- report on The Sanitary Condition of Willesden (1882), ^ud^mor- speaks feelingly of the increase in child-mortality, and taiityfrom deploi'es "the pernicious habit of drinking large quantities aieand stout of ale or stout by nursing mothers, under the idea that f^^a'tkjn they thereby increase and improve the secretion of milk, whereas they are in reality deteriorating the quality of that upon which the infant must depend for health and life." On the 8th of January, 1881, Dr. J. C. Reid wrote to the Dr.. J. C. British Medical Journal: "Truly he is a happy man — ing against" a happy doctor I should say — who can honestly affirm that alcoholic he never, by his alcoholic prescriptions, made a drunkard. For myself, in my earlier days I was a firm believer in the many supposed virtues of alcoholic compounds. It is about fourteen years ago that the scales were removed fi'om my eyes by the stem reality of facts, and my sole regret now is that I held out so long against evidence of the most startling kind. " Many years ago, when I asked a noted drunkard to sign the pledge, she replied bitterly that I was the last man who ought to give her such advice. For it was my own father who had taught her to love the drink. He had prescribed whiskey for her in an illness, and she had learned to love it. I succeeded with her for fifteen months, but after that she fell into the old miserable habit." 226 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. CHAPTER X. SOCIAL RESULTS, OR THE GENERAL EFFECTS ON SOCIETY CAUSED BY ALCOHOL. "Not one man in a thousand dies a natural death, and most diseases have their rise froui intemperance." — Lord Bacon. " People dread cholera, but brandy is a far worse plague." — Balzac. " If alcohol were unknown, half the sin and three quarters of the poverty and unhappiness would disappear from the world." — Edmund A. Parkes. " Short of drunkenness (that is, in those effects of it which stop short of drunkenness), I should say, from my experience, that alcohol is the most destructive agent we are aware of in this country." — Sir William Gull before the Lords' Select Committee of inquiry into prevalence of intemperance, 1877- § 60. In the preceding chapters I have endeavoured to point out the multifarious deep-reaching evils which alcohol entails on the individual who indulges in its use. In this chapter I shall try to show how generally these effects have been produced ; i.e., how many persons are suffering from the habit of di'ink, and in what way and degree it has acted on society and the State, especially in regard to this country (England). General To this end, wliich I can only hope to reach approxi- BUitutics. niately, I must make use of statistics — both governmental and others — which throw light on these points. And the enormous amount of available statistics on this matter, together with their scope ; the almost impossibility of making any brief, and at the same time clear statistical statement ; and the latitude of interpi-etation which almost all statistics afford, has made this portion of the work very difficult. SOCIAL RESULTS. 227 Modern Government statistics are definite, and convey a definite meaning, but their purport may be modifiable by a hundred different circumstances understood and allowed for by few, excepting trained statisticians. l^Tot- withstanding this, I cannot agree with those who deem that to the general public, statistics are not worth their cost in paper and ink. All statistics have a great worth negatively at least ; that is, as showing that the minimum of a national condi- tion of prosperity or decline has been fairly ascertained. Non- personal statistics, or such as relate to the gross amount of produce, manufactures, food, drink, their cost, etc., have even a positive value ; but those relating to persons — excepting births, deaths, marriages, and the like — all statistics involving self-interests, whether for conceal- ing income, escaping taxation, or avoiding uncompensated labour or expenditui'e of time in any way, or for escaping the law, etc., etc., have only a comparatively negative value. Statistics, for example, regarding convictions for di'unkenness have only the value of showing how many people the repressive force of the State has found it neces- sary to punish for having deliberately entered into a personally in-esponsible condition. But this would afford not even relatively con-ect information as to the existing amount of di'unkenness. In the first place, intoxicated people, if not incapable, or deserted, or dangerously violent, are seldom an^ested. Again, no police officer ven- tures into private homes merely because there are drunken people there ; he does not interfere with any peaceful transfer of a drunken person from the place of drinking to his home ; and any one who will take the trouble of looking into public-houses, especially early in the mornings and late at night, can form some idea of the inadequacy of the police returns on drunkenness as a real indication of the condition of the people on this point.* * In giving the aggregates of the Blach List of crimes due to drink in England during the Christmas week of 1883, and the first week of 1884, as follows : — 26 perilons accidents throngh drink, 13 robberies through drink, 5 cases of drunken insanity, 63 drunken outrages and violent assaults, 228 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Incon- Bistency of the attitude of Parlia- ment toward the drink- question. Again, many inebriates escape from aiTest, or if arrested are not counted in with the convicted, being saved by intercession,* personal influence, position, birth, etc. If thoughtful analysis of the ruin which alcohol works for the individual, streng-thened by the continual spectacle of its ghastly eifects which our homes and our streets afford — if these do not awaken a sense of the paramount duty of each and all to banish alcohol for ever fi'om the lips of mankind, then no statistics, however tenible, conclusive, and undeniable, could be of avail. § 61. With some notable individual exceptions, Parlia- ment does not yet seem to be imjjressed with its responsi- bility in the battle against di'ink ; for although appalling statistics, steadily increasing in dimensions, of crimes and insanity, unanimously admitted to be the results of drink, are annually laid befoi-e its members, yet petitions fi^om towns and whole counties signed by overwhelming majorities appeal in vain to Parliament to be allowed to banish the temptation of di'ink fi'om their midst, or that the number of places for the sale of alcoholic diinks may be limited. And yet as long ago as 1819-20, the British Parlia- 20 dranken stabbings, cuttings, and wonndings, 5 cases of drunken cruelty to children, 74 assaults on women through drink, 13 cases of juvenile intoxication, 70 drunken assaults on constables, 94 premature, sudden, or violent deaths through drink, 18 cases of suicide attempted through drink, 15 cases of drunken suicide completed, and 12 drunken manslaughters or murders, the Alliance News (January 26, 1884) says, "And besides this, it must be borne in mind that the reporters for the press are by no means always disposed or enabled to record the part which strong drink has manifestly had in the cases which they chronicle. A Scottish con-espondent, in sending in his contributions to the Black List, writes that ' There were nearly as many cases which we might have legitimately inferred were equally due to drink, but as liquor was not directly charged with the evil we had to do without the record.' No doubt a similar remark might have been miade by all our coadjutors." * " A Plymouth publican was yesterday charged with having drunken women on liis premises after closing time. He proved that they were lodgers, and the charge was dismissed." — Echo (February 1, 1884). SOCIAL RESULTS. 229 mentary Committee on Drink stated that " public-houses can only be regarded as Schools of Iniquity." The moral ineriia of Parliament as regards this evil is conspicuous in the continued Government supply of alcoholic drinks to the inmates of the workhouses. The Canterbury Convocations, in their report several years ago on diink, said — " It appears, indeed, that at least seventy-five per cent, of the occupants of our workhouses, and a large proportion of those receiving outdoor relief, have become pensioners on the public directly or indirectly through di'unkenness." This inertia is the more inexplicable when we remember that it must be patent to legislators and governments that the desperate spectre for years threatening Europe with the assassination of her rulers and the overthrow of the established order of things, is the alcohol-goaded despair, not of stolid but of naturally earnest minds.* They cannot be blind to the fact that the fitfulness and the unintelligence of popular favour, the iiTationality and pei'version of public opinion, as well as the dogged adherence to a bad measure once advocated — as if the mind groping and fumbling in a dark chamber, having grasped something, hangs to it without any thought of its meaning or use — are largely due to the general mental derangement which general indulgence in alcohol induces. Why do so many of the noblest thinkers of our time — those who have looked seriously into the problems which modem civilization presents — why do they despair' of the future of the race ? Why is the general turn of mind in our age stoically pessimistic or cynically materialistic ? Why indeed ? unless it is that the later generations of men, inheritors and fui-ther developers of the insidious poison of alcohol, are becoming in mind, as in body, des- sicated, life-sucked, so that the whole civilized race is not only crumbling physically I (however imperceptibly to the * Says John Disney, in Ancient Laws against Immorality (Cam. bridge, 1729):— " The vice of intemperance debases the genins and spirit of a nation ; indisposes them to noble designs and generous actions ; and either softens them to an effeminate indolence for the pubhc welfare, or fires them to seditious tumults." t Sir Henry Thompson, writing (March 15, 1873) to the late Archbishop of Canterbury (Dr. Archibald Campbell Tait), claimed 230 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. careless and indifferent) , but seems to be dwindling morally into two more or less interchangeable but distinct types ; the one not believing in the verity of God or the faith of raan, without hope and without emotion — existing, indeed, only in a narrow line of cynical intellectual activity ; the other, alternating between weakened faith and craven doubt, tossed by dark passions, temptations, and fui'ies, not the least of which are momentary spiritual exaltations, mocked by and toppling over in swdf tly succeeding debility and despair. Both these types wear a deceivingly fair exterior. We often see magnificent boughs and beautiful foliage on trees whose tranks ai^e but hollow crusts, worm-eaten fi'om core to rim. For fruit, or fuel, or for weathering the storm such a tree is naught, but yet the specious trunk manages to hold up and flaunt the fair foliage ! § 62. Eveiy one knows that abstinence is the exception and drinking — whether moderate or excessive — the rule. And those who, bearing this in mind, have attentively read the preceding pages can feel what the results must be, far more adequately than the most eloquent pen could portray them, and will not find it difiicult to credit that almost the whole state machinery of repression and punishment of crime, the whole army of police, detectives, judges, jailers, and hangmen, and the vast misery and expense of jails and lunatic asylums — yes, the asylums for idiots and the defective classes — might be done away with if — oh! what a mighty i/".'— people would not touch alcoholic liquors. In practical testimony to this truth I may cite the f ollowdng authorities : — " Drink alone destroys — ruins — more people than all destructive the other plagues together, which afflict humanity." — alcohol upon Buffon's Discourse on Nature (1765). " Every year I live increases my conviction that the use of intoxicating drinks is a greater destroying force to life and virtue than all other physical evils combined." — H. W. Beecher to Young Men's Christian Association, New York (1862). Various weighty opinions on society. Buffou. H. W. Beecher, that drinking " tends to deteriorate the race . . . and disqualifies it for advance." SOCIAL RESULTS. 231 " The use of strong' drink produces more idleness, The Times. ci"ime, disease, want, and misery than all other causes put together." — Times (January 19, 1863). " After running over the statistics of death from drink Dr. Gprmain published in the various countries, after attending for ^a^rty. some years the clinique of the gi'eat Parisian hospitals, after consulting the registry of cases admitted to ' homes for strangers,' one becomes perfectly convinced that alcoholic poisoning is a more murderous plague, perhaps, than the great epidemics which at different epochs have devastated humanity. The pest, the cholera, the yellow fever, break out suddenly and decimate a village, a province, a whole country, but their passage is transitory in essence. Alcoholism takes no holiday. ^^ — Dr. Germain Marty (Medical Thesis, Paris, December 24, 1872). " It has been said that greater calamities are inflicted w. E. Giad- on mankind by intemperance than by the three great ^^°^^- historical scourges, war, pestilence, and famine. This is true for us, and it is the measure of our discredit and disgi^ace." — "W. E. Gladstone (speech in House of Commons, March 5, 1880). Who can speak more authoritatively, or with more Opinions of impartiality, concerning the relations between drink and ^nhe''^'^* crime, than the judges of Great Britain ? * And what United do they say ? Let us see. '°^ °™' " 1 have been thii-ty years chairman of quarter sessions M.O'Shaugh- in several counties in Ireland. I have, perhaps, presided ^'^^^y- at more criminal trials than most men living, and I can truly say that 1 have had scarcely a case before me with reference to the class of offences known as against the person, that was not the consequence of drunkenness." — Mr. M. O'Shaughnessy, Q.C., Chairman of Quarter Sessions, Co. Clare. " Men go into public-houses respectable, and come out Mr. Justice felons."— Mr. Justice Grove. ^'°'"- " The crying and besetting crime of intemperance is a Mr. Justice crime leading to all other crimes ; a crime which you may Fitzgerald. very well say leads to nineteen-twentieths of the crimes of this country." — Mr. Justice Fitzgerald, Dublin Assizes, 1878. * See opening pages of chap. viii. 232 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Baroa Dowse. Stipendiary magistrate of Liverpool. Lord Chief Justice Cole- Mr. Justice Denman. Baron Huddleston. Sir Matthew Hale. " If our people were more sober I think crime would alm.ost entirely disappear from our midst." — Baron Dowse, at Wicklow, 1878. Again, in charging the juiy in the Dublin Commission Coiu't, November, 1881, the Baron said he " found that drink was at the bottom of almost every crime committed in Dublin. Even in cases that had no apparent connection with drink at all, if closely investigated, as he himself had done on many occasions, they would be found to have their origin in drinJc.^' The Bench of England confirms the Bench of Ireland. In 1878 the stipendiary magistrate of Liverpool said — " The moving cause of crimes of violence and disorder in our midst is di^unkenness. We may set down thi'ee- fourths, I think nine-tenths of them, as arising fi'om drunkenness." In 1881 Lord Chief Justice Coleridge stated from the bench of the Supreme Court, that " Judges were weary with calling attention to di'ink as the principal cause of crime, but he could not refi'ain fi*om saying that if they could make England sober they would shut up nine-tenths of the prisons." In his charge at the SuiTey Assizes, in August, 1882, Mr. Justice Denman said — " I don't know, in enforcing the considerations which are placed before the judges as a part of their duty in the proclamation against vice and immorality which has just been read, that any judge can better discharge his duty than by again and again calling the attention of the gentry of the country, as well as inhabitants generally, to this fact, that the gi'eat bulk — I might almost say the whole — of the offences of violence which take place in the counties of this land are dii'cctly ascribable to the habit of drinking." In the same month and year Baron Huddleston is reported to have said to the grand jury at Swansea that — " Of the forty-four cases down on the calendar, he found almost all traceable, directly or indirectly, to the detestable habit of drinking. Two hundred years ago, Sir Matthew Hale, one of the most eminent judges that ever adorned the English bench, declared that twenty years of obsei'^'^a- tion taught him that the original cause of most of the SOCIAL RESULTS, 233 enormities committed by criminals was drink. Four out of every five of them were the issue and product of drink- ing in taverns and alehouses. Baron Huddleston feared what was true then was true now, and that we have improved very little, if at all." At the Chester Spring Assizes, on the 13th of April, Mr. Justice 1883, Mr. Justice Hawkins, in charging the grand juiy, Hawkins, said that — " Although, numerically, the calendar was light, yet there were in it charges recorded against several persons of most serious offences. After referring to other cases, his lordship touched upon the attempted murder of a child by its mother by throwing it upon the fire, then pouring scalding water upon it. The mother was under the in- fluence of drink, and it was almost always the case, accord- ing to his experience, that drink was at the root of crime. Nine out of every ten crimes of violence that had come before him were in one way or another attributable to drink." Again, on the 16th of July, 1883, Mr. Justice Hawkins is reported to have said, in charging the grand jury at the opening of the Durham Assizes, that he — " Had had considerable experience in courts of law, and every day he lived the more firmly did he come to the conclusion that the root of all cri^ne was drink. It affected people of all ages and both sexes — the middle-aged, the young, the father, the son, the husband, and the wdfe. It was drink which was the incentive to crimes of dishonesty ; a man stole in order that he might provide himself with the means of getting drink. It was di'ink which caused homes to be impoverished, and they could trace to its source the cause of misery which was to be found in many a cottage home which had been denuded of all the common necessities of life. Se believed that nine- tenths of the crime of this country, and certainly of the county of Durham, was engendered within public-houses* When he came to that conclusion he thought it was his duty to enjoin upon the m0,gistrates who had the power to check in some respect the terrible ravages of drink, to do their utraost to suppress it with all the power and authority with which the law invested them. The county of * See opening pages of chap. viii. 234 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Mr. WiUiam Hoyle's drink statistics. The Rev. Dr. Dawson Burns on the expenditure of the British Isles annually ia drink as compared with other expenditure. Durham was tbe one county in all England where crime was most prevalent." § 63. The statistics quoted below are principally taken from various parts of the work of the indefatigable and admittedly the best statistician on the subject of drink — Mr. William Hoyle. Commenting, in a leading article of great ability, on Mr. Hoyle's statistics, the Times (March 29, 1881) says, " Drinking baffles us, confounds us, shames us, and mocks at us at every point. It outwits alike the teacher, the man of business, the patriot, and the legislator. Every other institution flounders in hopeless difficulties ; the public-house holds its triumphant course. The adminis- trators of public and private charity are told that alms and oblations go with rates, doles, and pensions to the all-absorbing bar of the public-house." Estimating roughly in round numbers, so as to leave more room for a comparative computation of vast numbers, we find that the average of the gross total of the national income during the last ten years (ending in 1881) was £850,000,000 a year. According to Hoyle, the direct average expenditure for drink annually, during the same time exceeded £136,000,000, and he estimates that annually £138,000,000 were indirectly spent or lost through drink — a total drinking expenditure of £274,000,000. " Deducting, say, £54,000,000 from this sum for revenue," says Hoyle, " and for what some persons might consider the needful use of these drinks in medicine or otherwise, it still leaves a sum of £220,000,000 as the annual economic loss to the nation in consequence of the drinking customs of our population." The Rev. Dr. Dawson Burns, in Christendom and the Drinh Ciirse (London, 1875), makes this succinct summary of the comparative loss to the nation annually occasioned by drink : — " The British people annually expend on in- toxicating liquors a sum of above a hundred and thirty naillions sterling, the great bulk of it coming from the pockets of men and women who would be seriously affronted if any doubt were cast upon their religious sincerity. This sum is sixty millions in excess of the national revenue. It is one-sixth of the National Debt. It is one-fifth the value of all the railway property of the United Kingdom. It is SOCIAL RESULTS. 235 equal to one-fonrtli of the whole income of the wage- receiving- classes, and one-eighth of the income of all classes united. It is equal to a yearly expenditure of £4 per head, and of £22 per family, in the United Kingdom." In a paper read before the Statistical Society of London Mr. Stephen ■^ ^ T . . . 15ourne on (April, 1880), Mr. Stephen Bourne, a noted statistician, the same. arrived at similar results to Mr. Hoyle's, but from an opposite point of view. Mr. Hoyle estimates the harm done from computing the pecuniary loss ; Mr. Bourne computes the pecuniary loss from the harm done. The National Temperance League Annual (1883) gives the following summary of Mr. Bourne's paper : — " Mr. Bourne estimates that of the people of this country about 10^ millions are ' producers ; ' that of these ' 65 or 70 per cent, are wholly employed in providing food, drink, and other necessaries of life ; and that it is only the remainder (three millions and a half) who are available for the production of luxuries, and the accumulation of wealth.' He further estimates that the producing power of 1,097,625 persons is wholly absorbed by the liquor traffic ; and that 884,000 who might be employed as producers of wealth, are rendered economically useless by the damage done by drink. The latter number being made up as follows : — By deaths, adult and infantile ... 120,000 „ sickness of producers 150,000 „ ,, administrators ... 185,000 „ pauperism 200,000 „ crime ... 88,000 ,, professional and other service 50,000 „ revenue officials 6,000 „ army, navy, and merchant service ... 85,000 884,000' " If there was no alcohol to be produced or consumed there might be two millions of producers, or an addition of 60 per cent, to our power of producing articles other than those of daily use for stores. That is, as two millions constitute about a fifth of the total number of producers, the drink traffic absorbs about one-fifth of the productive power of the nation. And the total income of the nation — the total product of the industry of the nation, is variously 236 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. estimated at from 850 millions to 1200 millions a year. Mr. Grladstone puts it at about 1000 ruillions a year. One- fifth of this sum is 200 millions. So that, measured in money, the yearly cost of the drink traffic to the nation is about 200 millions, a sum which approximates very closely to that reached by Mr. Hoyle." Roughly estimating the average liquor revenue during the same ten years (1871-1881) at £32,000,000 annually, and subtracting half this sum as the admitted average amount which the State expends in preventing, i-epairing, and punishing evils resulting from drink, we find that the State annually expends between 150 and 200 million pounds — most of which might be saved to the people — in order to make sure of its own annual revenue of from fifteen to twenty million pounds. Mr. Hoyie's In the Drink Traffic and its Evils, Mr. Hoyle makes the Traffic^and following Comparison of estimates : — " To manufacture its Evils." the £13-1,000,000 worth of intoxicating liquors consumed during each of the past twelve years, 80,000,000 bushels of grain, or its equivalent in produce, has been destroyed each year ; and, taking the bushel of barley at 53 lbs., it gives us 4,240,000,000 lbs. of food destroyed year by year, or a total for the twelve years of 960,000,000 bushels or 50,880,000,000 lbs. " The genei'ally accepted estimate of grain consumed as bread food by the population of the United Kingdom is 5^ bushels per head per annum ; if this be so, then, the food which has been destroyed to manufacture the intoxi- cating liquors which have been consumed in the United Kingdom during the past twelve years would supply the entire population with bread for four years and five months ; or, it would give a 4-lb. loaf of bread to every family in the United Kingdom daily during the next six years. " If the grain and produce which have thus been de- stroyed yearly were converted into flour and baked into loaves, they would make 1,200,000,000 4-lb. loaves. To bake these loaves it would require 750 bakeries producing 500 loaves each hour, and working ten hours daily during the whole year. " An acre of fairly good land is estimated to yield about 38 bushels of barley. If this be so, then, to grow the grain to manufacture the £134,000,000 worth of liquor SOCIAL RESULTS. 237 whicla has been consumed yearly, it would take a cornfield of more than 2,000,000 acres, or it would cover the entire counties of Kent, Surrey, Middlesex, and Berkshire.* " The value of the bread consumed annually in the United Kingdom is estimated at £70,000,000. Mr. Caird estimates the value of the butter and cheese consumed yearly at £27,500,000, and that of milk at £26,000,000, so that we have spent as much upon intoxicating liquors each year during the past twelve years as upon bread, butter, cheese, and milk, and leaving £10,000,000 yearly to spare. " The rent paid for houses in the United Kingdom is * " Table showing the Population, Total Cost, and Average Cost PEE Head of Intoxicating Liquors in the United Kingdom for various Years from 1820 to 1870, and for each sub- sequent Year up to 1882. Year. Population. Total cost. Average cost per head. £ £ s. d. 1820 20,807,000 50,440,655 2 8 6 1825 22,571,000 67,027,263 2 19 5 1830 23,820,000 67,292,278 2 16 5 1835 25,443,000 80,527,819 3 3 1840 26,500,000 77,605,882 2 18 10 1845 27,072,000 71,632,232 2 12 11 1850 27,320,000 80,718,083 2 18 10 1855 28,188,000 76,761,114 2 14 6 1860 28,778,000 85,276,870 2 18 6 1865 29,861,000 106,439,561 3 11 3 1870 31,205,000 118,736,279 3 16 1 1871 31,513,000 125,586,902 3 19 1 1872 31,835,000 131,601,490 4 2 8 1873 32,124,000 140,014,712 4 7 8 1874 32,426,000 141,342,997 4 7 2 1875 32,749,000 142,876,669 4 7 3 1876 33,093,000 147,288,759 4 9 1877 33,446,000 142,007,231 4 4 10 1878 33,799,000 142,188,900 4 4 1 1879 34,155,000 128,143,865 3 15 1880 34,468,000 122,279,275 3 10 11 1881 34,929,000 127,074,460 3 12 3 1882 35,278,000 126,255,139 3 12 0' — William Hoyle's Our National Brink Bill as it affects the Nation's Well-being. London, 1884. 238 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. about £70,000,000 per annum ; the money spent yearly upon woollen goods is about £46,000,000, and upon cotton goods £14,000,000, giving a total of £130,000,000; so that we have spent upon intoxicating drinks each year during the last twelve years as much as the total amount of the house-rental of the United Kingdom plus the money spent in woollen and cotton goods, and leaving upwards of £4,000,000 to spare." According to the Daily Review of Edinburgh (March 4, 1884), Sir William Collins, at the great Scottish Temperance Convention (of the day previous), after moving the first reso- lution, to wit, " That in the opinion of this convention, the traffic in intoxicating liquors, as common beverages, is a pro- lific source of drunkenness, insanity, pauperism, vice, crime, misery, disease, and death ; and whilst thus proving ruinous to individuals and families, is at the same time hurtful to the trade and commerce of the nation, and utterly opposed to the general pi'osperity and well-being of the community," said that, " Assuming that the population of Glasgow contributed their proportion to the national drink bill, it would amount to nearly £2,000,000 per annum, or £13 10s. per family, while the whole rental of dwelling- houses in the city amounted to £1,233,371, or only £10 15s. per family ; and the average rental of the houses in which two-thirds of the people lived was only £6 10s., or less than one-half of the average sum spent per family on strong drink. On the other hand, the only result of the yearly drink bill was a large expenditure in dealing with the crime, poverty, and insanity whicli flowed from the traffic as a natural result, and an untold amount of misery, disease, and death to the slaves of the appetite, and, would that he did not require to add, to the helpless wives and still more helpless and innocent children. Could they, as patriots and professing Christians, stand longer by, and allow this state of things to continue ? The nations of the past, who stood in the front rank of civiliza- tion, where were they ? They fell because of their vices. Could they, who have had higher privileges, hope to escape from the consequences of their national vice and their national sin ? " And ex-Bailie Lewis, in a subsequent speech on the same occasion, said that " He had just been favoured with SOCIAL RESULTS. 239 the able and elaborate report of Captain M'Call, of Glasgow, which afforded evidence that during 1883 no fewer than 52,827 of the population of Glasgow were before a police magistrate. Of that number 40,537 were charged with drunkenness, simple assaults, etc. ; and again, of that number 14,366 were dragged from the gutters and gathered from the streets drunk and incapable. They had thus 1 out of every 40 of the population drunk and in- capable ; 1 out of every 15 charged with drunkenness and assaults ; and 1 out of every 11 before a police magistrate. Such was the condition of the western metropolis, whose motto is, ' Let Glasgow flourish by the Preaching of the Word.' It was right to observe that numbers of these were recommitments, but when they considered the large number of drunken persons who never fell into the hands of the police, it did not materially alter the case." All these figures point with a vengeance to the relations The relations between drink and poverty. With the sum now annually ^*^'^\^'^''h wasted in and throiigh drink, England could in a few poverty, years pay the entire l^ational Debt, and each individual could be comfortably housed, clothed, and fed. It is a common opinion that poverty has more to do in producing drink than drink in producing poverty, yet it must, from the foregoing startling figures, be perfectly obvious that there is no comparison between the two. The £130,000,000 expended in drink are the direct outlay only ; the best authorities declare that the mischief pro- duced by this drink, estimated in money, more than equals this sum, so that at least £250,000,000 form the gross total of the annual national loss through drink, which must inevitably produce a stupendous amount of poverty. That, in this production of poverty, many afflicted through it do not drink before being struck down by misfortune, is no doubt true ; but the great mass of the impoverished are so through drink, and further, though the poorer they become the less do they have to expend in drink, yet the little they do have is more certainly and exclusively spent in that way, to the utter neglect of every other claim or necessity. Thus drink first produces poverty, and then pushes it beyond the reach of remedy.* * " ' One in every eight of the population of rich and prosperons 240 THE FOUNDATIOX OF DEATH. Dr. Dawson Burns on drinkiDg as the main- spring of pauperism. That poverty causes drink in tlie sense that the wretchedly poor drink to drown their misery is probably in many instances true ; but in this argument it is often forgotten that the abject poverty which drives this class of people (meaning here all who turn to drink not from vicious propensity, but under the goad of unbearable woes) to drink, is directly due to the cii'cumstances and conditions as to work and wages, etc., which the drink traffic produces among the working classes, so that the honest, decent poor are beaten down in their struggle to keep on the level of decent poverty, and in their despair seek refuge in the very evil they have fought against at such heavy odds so long. " If all testimony is not fallacious," says the Rev. Dr. Burns (op. cit.), "the mainspring of Pauperism and of all Destitution is Drinking ; and until that is overcome, little reduction of the measure or burdens of this evil can be expected. Any temporary diminution will disappear with fluctuations of trade that are certain to occur. Without a Temperance reform, every project for permanently ameliorating our national impoverishment must be com- paratively inefficient ; but with such a reform the desired end could be accomplished to such an extent that the England dies a pauper.' So we are told. But is not the statement altogether incredible ? Is there in all broad England one prominent statesman or one leading journaUst who would believe it, if it were put before him ? I am convinced that there is not one. Yet it is substantially accurate. Here are the facts — some of the facts — on which it is based. In England and Wales during recent years, the number of paupers at one time receiving relief has averaged 800,000. Of these a little under 200,000 have been indoor, and a little over 600,000 have been outdoor paupers. Among the indoor paupers the mortality is very great. The Registrar-General's returns show that the deaths among indoor paupers constitute one-fifteenth of the total number of deaths in the country. It is difficult to ascertain with precision the number of deaths which yearly take place among the 600,000 outdoor paupers. Would it be extravagant to assume that the nimiber of deaths (not the death rate) amongst them must be at least as great as among the 200,000 ? If it be assumed that the number of deaths (not the death rate, observe) among the 600,000 is as great as among the 200,000 ; that is, if the death rate among the former is one-third as great as among the latter, we are shut in to the conclusion that of every fifteen deaths which take place in England and Wales, two are the deaths of paupers. And that is a greater proportion than one in eight." — Alliance News. SOCIAL RESULTS. 241 worst forms of indigence and wretcliedness would become as rare as they are now common ; all classes would be relieved, and it would be possible to extend adequate aid to those who are most deserving, but who now are either totally neglected or but scantily assisted." § 64. This problem of poverty and degradation is now so prominently before the public that it seems specially fitting to call attention particularly to these evils as a result of drink — to which fact, testimony of a very striking character comes in on every side ; which, it is earnestly to be hoped, will receive due attention from the Royal Commission for devising means for housing the poor, now sitting. The report of the Parliameutary Committee on Drink Pariia- ofl884savs mentaiy Oi lOO* bayb ^ ^ report on in- " The loss of productive labour in every department temperance of occupation, is to the extent of at least one day in six ^^ throughout the kingdom (as testified by witnesses engaged in various manufacturing operations), by which the wealth of the country, created, as it is, chiefly by labour, is retarded or suppressed to the extent of one million of every six that is produced, to say nothing of the constant derangement, imperfection, and destruction in every agricultural and manufacturing process, occasioned by the intemperance and consequent unskilfulness, inattention, and neglect of those affected by intoxication, and pro- ducing great injury in our domestic and foreign trade." From the reports by Drs. Parkes and Sandei'son Reports of (1871), I cite the following :- f^st^T. " A tin-plate worker in constant work earns 22s. a son. week. He has a wife, a careful, respectable woman, and four children. The husband drank heavily. Sometimes he brought home IBs., sometimes 16s., sometimes 12s. ; last week he di^ank it all. If he would bi-ing 22s. a week she would be happy as the day is long. This family of six persons were living in one back room, paying Is. 6d. a week rent. It was 10| feet long, 9 feet broad, and 8| feet high. The furniture was a bed, table, and two rickety chairs.. Two of the four children were sick." Sir Wilfrid Lawson, M.P., addressing a meeting of the IfSw^' United Kingdom Alliance, January 24, 1879, said — Lawsou. " There were a great many causes working togethev and causing the distress of the country at the present R 242 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. time. Everybody liad his notion about the causes of it. He read in the Licensed Victuallers' Guardian the argu- ment of the licensed victuallers for it. Their account was that the distress was caused by over-trading, over- trading was caused by dishonesty and hypocrisy, and hypocrisy was caused by teetotalism. He was of the contrary opinion. He believed if the bulk of the people of this country were teetotalers there would have been very little distress at the present time. The Lord Provost, during the last few weeks that he had administered relief to the distressed in Glasgow, had asked every applicant if he was a teetotaler, and found he had not one teetotaler come before him for relief. Not considering other questions of foolish expenditure, he said the £140,000,000 which they spent every year in drink was quite sufficient to account for the distress. So long as in a country like this we went on spending that enormous amount of money, it appeared to him impossible that we could have a return to the prosperity which we should all like to see. The question was, how to put this expenditure down ? It was said by some, ' Educate the people,' but he would ask how long we had to wait before these educational results showed themselves ? During the last ten years we must have spent upwards of twenty millions of public money alone in educating the people, Avhilst intemperance had rather increased than diminished. So that they would see that education alone was not the cure. Some people said that the people wanted better homes, and that would be the remedy. But it was the drinkiiig that made the bad home. It was not the bad homes that made the drinking. Others there were who held that religion would cure it. He admitted that truth was omnipotent, but if they could not bring the truth home to the people it was no good." Address by On the 16th of January, 1880, Lord Derby, in an Lord Derby, ^ddress to the Liverpool Penny Savings Bank Association, said — " It may seem almost ridiculous to speak of penny savings in connection with the gTowth or decline of national wealth : but yet look at the matter that way. I will not repeat the old story of what the British liquor bill is — just one hundred and forty millions, or £20 a head for every SOCIAL RESULTS. 243 family of five in the British Isles. Nor will I tell you that half that sum saved would pay all the taxes of the year ; but we all know that, without supposing the nation to adopt very ascetic habits, or even to become as strictly frugal as France, there is an enormous margin for reason- able economy, and we do not, I think, always sufficiently appreciate the fact that private frugality will enforce public economy. Suppose only one quarter of the sum spent in liquor or tobacco to be saved, that implies a reduction of ten millions in the revenue, and do you suppose any Chancellor of the Exchequer would go to ivorJc to put on those ten millions again by taxation ? Not he ; he would learn to do without them. It is a peculiarity of this country, and I think a happy peculiarity, that the classes whose incomes are under £150 a year — the class, that is, who live on weekly wages — may relieve themselves almost entirely from taxation if they think fit." The next is quoted from the Alliance News (March 5, Address by "[gg]^) . Mr. Edward T -I 1 1 /• m Jones, of the ' In an address to the ' ratepayers of Toxteth Park and Toxteth others whom it may concern,' Mr. Edward Jones, of 4, Guardians. Amberley Street, Liverpool, a member of the Toxteth Board of Guardians, says, ' The Guardians of Toxteth Park, in dealing with applications for relief from week to week, were struck by the large number of these cases which came from a particular district of the township. A return was therefore ordered of the exact number of applications for relief during a given period, from that portion of the township to the north of Pfirk Street and west of Park Road, as compared with the applications from the rest of the township. These returns revealed the " startling fact " that two-thu-ds of our pauperism came from this district, comprising about one-eighth of the area, and only one-fourth of the population ; the exact numbers being, from the district marked A, with heavy dark tints on the map, 911 applications for relief ; from district B, 542 ; and from district C, 45, in the same period. The amount of money spent in liquor in district A may be gathered from the fact that over one hundred public- houses, or about half the total number of public-houses in the township, are maintained and doing a more or less flourishing trade within or closely abutting upon this area. 244 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Estimating the average "weekly takings " of each of these public-houses at £20, and assuming that fully one-half of the population here are sober, industrious people, who spend little or nothing on drink, it may be taken for granted that from 10s. to 20s. per week from many families goes for liquor. How many struggling, sober, industrious families, paying poor rates, are compelled to live on less than those receiving parish relief spend in liquor when they can get it ? The direct cost to the township of this area, in poor rates, is not less than £10,000 per annum, or equal to 6d. in the pound of the rates, over and above a very liberal allowance for pauperism. To this may be added the charge for extra police in these parts, the large sums distributed in private charity, and the hundred other ways in which the thriftless and the dissolute manage to impose a heavy burden of taxation, voluntary and in- voluntary, upon their neighbours. The money cost is not the only or the worst part of the business. Murders, stabbing, wounding, and other crimes of violence, are of frequent occurrence here. The slaughter of innocent babes, smothered by their drunken mothers, out-herods Herod. The death rate within this area, if published separately, would astonish the Health Committee and the Town Council of Liverpool, and would stand in striking contrast "with the rate of mortality in the portions of the township without public-houses, which averages 10 in a 1000 in the rural district. Here it would probably be not less than 40 per 1000. Vice and immorality from these parts crowd our workhouse hospital, which must soon be enlarged, at the cost of the ratepayers, and there is displayed a state of things too revolting for description. . . . The applications for painsh relief are few and far between, and these few from the streets nearest the dark area, though a large proportion of the inhabitants are of the artisan and labouring class. The head constable reports that his officers have very little to do in this district. No complaint has ever been heard of the absence of public-houses in the district, which is two miles long, and nearly the same distance wide in its longest measure- ment. That the people in the dark area do not wish public-houses in their midst is pi'oved by the fact that they are rapidly migrating into the bright area, and that SOCIAL RESULTS. 245 whenever memorials in favour of Sunday closing of public- houses, and other restrictions, are got up, the people in the dark area are most unanimous in signing them. A motion for memorializing the Government in favour of a measure for reducing the number of public-houses was supported by seven members of the Toxteth Board of Guardians, while eight voted against.' " And the same journal (January 7, 1882) publishes the Address by following from the pen of the Rev. John Kirk, D.D., joun Kirk Edinburgh : — " This United Kingdom of ours is threatened with terrible poverty. The plague which is in various forms coming upon us is emphatically national. ... A small number of people are becoming enormously rich, while the great mass of the community is becoming rapidly poor. . . . Especially in London scores are dying of literal starva- tion for lack of food to eat. ... It is to be expected that explanations of this state of things should be given, but it is immensely strange that the most obvious of all should not even be suffered to be hinted at in the press, in the pulpit, or on the platform ! . . . Above one hundred and fifty millions of sterling money a year is actually being handed over by the masses of the people into the hands of a few families for worse than nothing ! The expenditure of this money in liquor involves far more than an equal loss in efficient labour, and in other ways. The ignorance of the multitude is so great, the fascination of the liquor is so powerful, the huge swindle is so supported by law and government, and the stream of gold is so enormous, that it is ostracism to lay it bare to the public eye, and yet it is wonderful that it should be possible to be silent on the subject, when the great body of the nation is rapidly sinking into helpless poverty by this iniquity alone ! Only look at the subject for a few moments. Allow this liquor system to be suppressed, and at least three hundred millions of sterling money annually will remain in the ownership of the mass of the people. Let this sum as a capital be employed as it is employed now wherever liquor-selling has been suppressed ; let this wealth accumu- late as it win, and must do, and what would even seven ' bad harvests ' do ? The truth is palpable. These harvests would not give the people serious concern. They would 24)6 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. buy up our own farmers' grain, such as it is, at a good price, and do the same with the American and other grain. All would prosper, perhaps with the solitary excep- tion of those who are now growing rich at the expense of their country's thi^eatened ruin. . . . " In the meantime, the subject is daily becoming one of more terrible importance to the great mass of the people. There is a fascination in alcohol so strong that its sale has only to be introduced into a neighbourhood to make it perfectly sure that it will carry everything before it. You may educate and civilize as you can ; you may evangelize in the best possible methods ; yet, if you keep up the distribution of strong drink among a people, you may rob them to any degree, and they will not even complain ! It is incredible to what an extent the brewer and distiller have men and women at their will — so is it incredible that a Government can levy ten shillings of a tax on a liquor that does not quite cost one shilling and fourpence. But, however incredible, it is simple truth that so it is in reality ! The very men who take the grain from our best fields, and convert it into a fiery liquid, ruinous to soul and body, are able to give ten shillings out of every eleven shillings and fourpence to what is called ' the State,' and yet to make large fortunes out of the remaining sixteenpence ! They are able, too, to secure such a sentiment among a large and influential portion of the community as surrounds their amazing traffic with a sort of halo of respectability ! And yet they dare not risk the power of licence for that traffic on the vote of the ratepayers ! They dare not risk it on the vote even of drunkai^is ! " Mr. AViiiiam The following from Mr. William's Hoyle's pamphlet, testimony ^^*'' ^CL^'ional Resources and hoiv they are Wasted, appeared in the Alliance News (October 27, 1883) : — " The policy has been, multiply the temptations to in- temperance, and then fine the drunkard or send him to prison. If he went on drinking till he or those dependent upon him were impoverished, let him be packed off to the workhouse. If by their dissipated conduct they lost their characters and became vagi-ants, needing a night's lodging, the policy was to make it unpleasant for them, and so drive them to barns, brick-kilns, hay-ricks, or anywhere else. If, when maddened by drink, or when impelled by SOCIAL RESULTS. 247 hunger, they committed crime, then their names were to be put upon the black list, enrolled among the outcasts of the nation, and over them was to be set the ever- watchful eye of the policeman. And if their children rambled about the streets uncared for, they were to be sent off to re- formatory schools, where they would be supported and trained at the expense of the good citizens of the com- munity, and the parents relieved from the burdens and expense of their charge, and thus enabled to have more money and freedom wherewith to indulge in dissipation and hurry on their own ruin. Such has been the policy of our statesmen during the last thirty or forty years, and to this policy we may attribute three-fourths, if not nine- tenths, of the social evils that so grievously affect our land. " During the entire period of the recent long depression in trade, some very remarkable economic phenomena have * presented themselves. In the first place, the warehouses of the country have been crowded with goods wanting customers, and side by side with these there have been multitudes of persons in distress and want, needing the goods which so overcrowded the warehouses. And then, further, there have been the banks with their coffers glutted with money seeking to be employed in carrying out the purchase and the transfer of stocks in the ware- houses to the backs and the homes of the people who were in want ; at the same time wages have been comparatively high, and the price of food has been low, thus giving a large margin of the nation's income as available for invest- ment in manufactured goods ; and yet the desired trade has not come. How has this arisen ? " There can only be one answer given to this question, viz., the one given by the JEcoiiomist newspaper in its annual trade review in 1876. The Economist then stated that the dulness of trade arose from the fact that from some cause or other the means of consumers had become lessened ; or, in other words, people had become so impoverished as to have no money with which to buy the goods. " What was it that had impoverished the people ? There were several minor causes that had contributed to this, chief among which were the bad harvests of the country. The loss from this source was variously estimated 248 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. in different years at from £20,000,000 to £50,000,000 per annum ; but the main cause of impoverishment was this : the money which ought to have gone into the tills of the grocer, the draper, the tailor, the furniture dealer, etc., went into the till of the publican; £136,000,000 yearly thus spent, and another £100,000,000 sacrificed to atone for the mischief which the expenditure of the £136,000,000 caused, could have no other result than to produce depression in trade. There was every element of trade prosperity present, except the buying element, but, unfortunately, that element, instead of applying itself to the purchase of the goods which filled the warehouses, wasted its resources at the public-house ; for instance, £4 per head were spent yearly in di'ink, and but eight shillings on cotton goods, and so people were in poverty and rags, and manufacturers could find no mai"ket for their goods. " The question may arise in the minds of some of my audience — What does it matter whether the money be spent in dinnk or in manufactured goods, or in house- building, or in improving land, or, indeed, in any way ? for, it is said, does not the money circulate in the country in one case just as much as in the other ? Let us look at this point for a moment. " I will suppose the case of one hundred men, each earning £2 weekly. On an. average the men spend 12s. per week each in drink, which, unfortunately, for many men is not extravagant. At the eud of the year these one hundred men will have spent £3120. Well, it is said, the £3120 is not lost, for it is circulating through the country, and, therefore, what does it matter how it is spent? " Suppose, however, that instead of spending the 12s. weekly in di'ink, they put the money into a building club and invest it in building houses, the money would build twenty houses worth £156 each, and at the end of the year the £3120 would be circulating in the country just as was the case when spent in drink. In the one case there are £3120 circulating, plus nothing ; in the other case there are £3120 circulating, plus twenty houses added to the wealth of the nation. " Let us pursue the comparison further. As a result of the £3120 spent in drink, there would probably be some hundreds of cases of drunkenness ; there would bo SOCIAL RESULTS. 249 neglect and loss of work ; there would often be cruelty and misery at home ; there would be headaches, sickness, accidents ; there would be neglect of families, pauperism, crime, vagrancy ; there would probably be some addition of persons to the unemployed population of the country, and maybe also some parts of the families of the hundred men would find their way down amongst the lapsed masses of society. And there would further be the costs and burdens resulting from this condition of things ; and the waste of labour and cost of striving to neutralize and remedy them. It is a low estimate to assume that from these causes £2000 would be lost to society, in addition to the £3120 of direct expenditure, or over £5000 in all. " Let us follow the other expenditure in its results. In the first place, we find some twenty or more men set to work to build the houses. These, of course, would earn weekly wages, and at the end of the week, themselves or their wives would be ofB to the shops to purchase goods for their families ; and besides this there would be the absence of the drunkenness and misery which resulted when, the money was spent in drink. " In one case we have £3120 circulated, plus a further indirect loss of some £2000, all of which is abstracted from trade, plus resulting misery that is appalling. " In the other case we get £3120 circulated, plus twenty houses added to the nation's stock of wealth ; plus employment found for twenty or more workmen ; plus increased trade for the shopkeepers and naanufacturers ; plus a diminished taxation owing to the absence of the drink evil ; plus happiness to the families concerned, instead of misery and maybe ruin. " In order fully to appreciate the economic influence of these two courses of action, we must carry the comparison into the second year. The one hundred men who kept off the drink start the year with twenty houses, valued at £3120, whilst the others have nothing. If these houses are let at 4s. each weekly, they will yield £200 per annum, or it is an addition to the men's income of £2 each yearly, for which the men do not work. The third year it would be more, and the fourth year more again, and so wealth would go on increasing, the demand for labour would correspondingly grow, and along with both there 250 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. "would be comfort and plenty instead of misery and ruin. " A moment's reflection will start the problem in the mind of every thoughtful person ; if to redeem an ex- penditure of £3120 from drink and transfer it to other and legitimate channels, so much of economic and social good results, what would have been the sum of the economic and social good which would have resulted from the redemption of the whole of the drink expenditure of £136,000,000 yearly during the last ten years ? I fancy that in such a case we should not have been here to-night discussing problems, social, economic, etc., for the prob- lems would have been solved, and the evils associated with them would have disappeared. " So far as economic result goes, waste of wealth is as hurtful to trade and to the development of material pro- gress when it occurs in the spending of money as in the production of goods. For example, if a man with an income of, say, 25s. weekly, throws 5s. of it into the sea, it will be clear that he might as well only have an income of 20s. ; or if he does what is the same thing, squanders it in a way that yields him no return of good, he would be quite as well off financially and economically if his wages were reduced to 20s. per week ; provided no portion of his income were squandered away. " But if the man spends his money in a way that not only yields him no return of good, bvit which, instead of good, entails evil upon him, upon his family, and perhaps upon the community at large, then by the extent of the losses and evils which result from such misspending of money, to that extent is the waste of wealth still further increased. If we assume that the damage resulting in equal in extent, say, to four shillings, it will be clear that society will be no better off than if the man's income were only sixteen shillings, for the simple reason that, besides the five shillings lost in the spending, there is four shillings lost in damage done. " It is an admitted fact in political economy that labour is the chief, if not the only source of value, or, in other words, of wealth. As a rule, things are valuable in pro- portion to the cost of their production. It will follow, therefore, that the labour of one week, if the income there- SOCIAL RESULTS. 251 from be properly expended, will create a demand for the labour of the succeeding week. If, therefore, there were only the current income fund to fall back upon, this, if properly expended, would keep the industrial ball rolling ; but when we remember that there is an accumulated capital that seeks employment, and when we know that money rightly laid out and labour rightly applied are constantly reproducing themselves, and adding to the capital stock which needs to find employment in purchasing labour, or the pi-oducts of labour, which is the same thing, it will be clear that there must be something terribly wrong in our economical an^angements and habits, or it would not be possible for pauperism and destitution to have a place in our midst. " But when one-fourth or one-third of the nation's income is applied to purposes that yield no return of good, but often of harm ; when we spend £136,000,000 yearly in drink, and sacrifice £100,000,000 more to make good the mischief which the drink does ; and when in many minor ways we add to this waste, the total becomes a great one, and is a constant draft upon the trading or buying fund of the nation, and so it becomes impossible that the industrial ball can be kept rolling, inasmuch as the fund needed to secui^e this is so largely wasted ; for we cannot both waste it and use it ; and we may try to amend our poor laws, we may increase the repressive character of our criminal and vagrant laws, we may seek to get better dwellings for the working classes, we may labour to find work for our un- employed population, or reform our land laws, and improve the waste lands of the country — all good and many of them very good in their way — but they can never compensate for the waste of so much of the nation's income and wealth. " If my hearers have been able to follow the facts and arguments which have been adduced, they will probably have come to the conclusion that the social questions which give to our statesmen and philanthropists so much concern would have no existence were it not for causes that we ourselves set in operation. The question of how to secure good trade, ensure fair and steady wages, provide work for our unemployed population, remove the inequalities of wealth and poverty which exist, how to banish pauperism and vagrancy, and largely reduce crime and lunacy, how to Bayley. 252 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. lift Tip from degradation the lapsed masses of our country, how to secure better dwellings for our working classes, with other problems, are all bound up with the question of the drinking habits of the nation ; remedy this, and all the others will practically disappear." Letter by Miss Mary Bayley writes in the Daily News (November ^HssMary 19^ 1883) — " Those of us who have long watched the steadily in- creasing horrors of the homes of our London poor are deeply thankful for the prominence you have lately given to this subject. Your contributor says with truth that ' no single reform, no single line of effort will meet the evil ; ' but as regards both the small earnings mentioned, and the doubt expressed whether even comfortable incomes would avail much as things now are, I should like to call atten- tion to the results of increased income in the past, and to causes now adding to pressure in the labour market. The five years which preceded 1877 were a time of unusual prosperity in the way of earning money ; work was com- paratively plentiful, and wages high. During those years the increase in the consumption of intoxicating drink was enormous ; the home consumption of cotton goods went down eight per cent. Those who watched the homes of the poor during those dreadful years state that their moral condition then fell to a lower point than had ever been known before. There were happy exceptions not a few ; but to the vast majority the large sums earned brought rather a diminution than an increase of all that is worthy the name of prosperity. Turning now to the subject of famine wages and competition for employment, even here the door of prosperity is bolted and barred, not by want of resources, but by our vices. When I retui^n from homes whose belongings, all put together, would once have failed to realize half a crown, and see that, though only receiving the same wages as before, the reclaimed occupants have become customers to the ironmonger, cabinet-maker, crockery shop, linendraper, etc., I am at a loss to conceive how great would be the natural increase in demand for labour of all kinds if this change should become general. And when reading the heartrending statistics of ill-paid labour done by women, let us not forget that there are tens of thousands of married women crowding up the SOCIAL RESULTS. 253 labour market who ought never to be there at all. I have persuaded very many women to give up all paid labour, and to devote themselves entirely to their families. I can recall no instance where this change was not advantageous, even pecuniarily, for the waste and destruction caused by neglected children are indescribable. Where the wife has to earn money the children are usually in rags. Just a few indispensable articles of clothing are purchased ready- made at a slop-shop, at a price so low one wonders how anything can have been paid for making up. The mother at home can encourage honest trade by buying decent material which she makes up herself. But how is all this possible while thousands upon thousands of pounds arc swept into publicans' tills every Saturday and Sunday night ? The sums that are still forthcoming to procure intoxicating drink appear to me to disprove your contribu- tor's statement that low wages are the main root of our pi'esent distress. They are a fruit, though bearing seed, it is true, and thus continually dropping fresh roots." In his papers on " How the Poor live," published during George R. the summer of 1883 in TJie Pictorial World, Mr. George R. f-How'^he Sims says Poor live." " The gin palaces flourish in the slums, and fortunes are made out of men and women who seldom know where to-morrow's meal is coming from. ... A copper or two often obtained by pawning the last rag that covers the shivering children on the bare floor at home, will buy enough vitriol madness to send a woman home so besotted that the wretchedness, the anguish, the degradation that await her there have lost their grip. ... If I vs^ere asked to say offhand what was the greatest curse of the poor, and what was the greatest blessing, I think my answer to the first query would be the public-house, and to the second, the hospital." And this from the Daily News (November 20, 1883) : — The testi- " Speaking on Sunday night at the Great Central Hall, Mr.°Caine, Shoreditch, which is within a stone's throw of some of the m.p. London ' slums,' Mr. Caine, M.P., said that the question of housing the London poor was one, he thought, in which Parliament could help, not by building houses at the cost of the State, but in removing as far as possible the causes which resulted in the evils now being so widely discussed. 254 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Canon Farrar's sermon on drink in Westminster Abbey, Nov. 19, 1883. George R. Sims on " Horrible London." Drink made the poor live where they did. Tales of poverty had been told — how people had to make match-boxes at 2^d. per gross, how women had to work fourteen or fifteen hours per day at shirt work ere they could earn a shilling, how at waistcoat-making people could not get a living. Why was it ? Because trade was depressed, was the answer. Why was trade depressed? Because those who wanted to buy could not buy. Who were those who wanted to buy and could not ? People who took their money to the public-house instead of laying the same out in necessaries. If London next day became teetotal, £200,000 per week would be available. Two hundred thousand families might have a pound per week each added to their incomes." On the occasion of the twenty-first anniversary of the Church of England Temperance Society, November 19, 1883, a noble sermon on the drink evil was preached in Westminster Abbey by Canon Farrar. " We have beard much in these days," said he, " of ' Horrible London,' and of the bitter cry of its abject. What makes these slums so horrible ? I answer with certainty, and with the confidence of one who knows — drink ! What is the remedy ? I tell you every remedy you attempt will be a miserable failure. I tell the nation with convic- tion founded on experience that there will be no remedy till you save these outcasts from the temptation of drink. Leave the drink, and you might build them palaces in vain ; leave the drink, and before the year is over your palaces would be reeking with dirt and squalor, with infamy and crime." * Says Mr. Sims, in his paper on " Horrible London " in the Daily News (November 23, 1883) — " It is not fair to prove by facts and statistics the evil of over-population and the evil of low wages, and to shrink from revealing the evil of drink. That has to be removed as w^ell as the others, and must be taken into account. ... It is only when one probes this wound that one finds how deep it is. Much as I have seen of the drink evil, it was not until I came to study one special district, with a view of ascertaining how far the charge of drunkenness could be maintained against the poor as a body, that I had * Church of England, Temperance Chronicle, Nov. 24', 1883. SOCIAL RESULTS. 255 any idea of tlie terrible extent to whicli this cause of poverty prevails. " Come to a coramon lodging-house, and see what class of people fill the beds at fouvpence a night. Poor labourers ? Yes. Loafers and criminals ? Yes. But hundreds of men who have once been in first-class posi- tions, and who have had every chance of doing well, are to be found there also. " For my purpose I will merely take the cases which have di"ifted to the slum lodging-house through drink. " The following have all passed recently through one common lodging-house in one of the most notorious slums of London : — " A paymaster of the Royal Navy. " Two men who had been college chums at Cambridge, and met accidentally here one night, both in the last stage of poverty. One had kept a pack of hounds, and succeeded to a large fortune. " A physician's son, himself a doctor, when lodging here sold fusees on the Strand. " A clergyman who had taken high honours. Last seen in the Borough, drunk, followed by jeering boys. " A commercial traveller and superintendent of a Sunday school. " A member of the Stock Exchange — found to be suffering from delirium tremens — removed to work- house. " The brother of a clergyman and scholar of European repute died eventually in this slum. Friends had ex- hausted every effort to reclaim him. Left wife and three beautiful children living in a miserable den in the neigh- bourhood. Wife drinking herself to death. Children rescued by friends and provided for. " Brother of a vicar of a large London parish — died in the slum. " These are all cases which have passed through one common lodging-house. What would the others show had we the same opportunity of knowing their customers ? These people have all been forced back on a rookery through drink — sober, they need never have sunk so low as that." The following is quoted from the " Dustman's speech " The "Dust- 256 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. mans speech " in Ex.ter Hall (Nov. 21, 1833). The con- dition of drunkards' children. at the Working-men's Meeting, November 21, 1883, in Exeter Hall :— " 1 say again, as a working man, that we have had too much talk about a working man being robbed of his liberty if he gives up intoxicating drink : that is exactly when he gets his liberty. I say, God bless the publicans and the distillers, and may they soon lose the situation that they now have, for life to them is death to us. 1 will show them why. If they lost their situations, there would be more custom for other shopkeepers, and the surroundings of neighbourhoods would be improved. If there is anything that is interfering with the liberty of the people at the present day, it is the consumption of intoxicating drink." As to the children of drunkards, the Alliance News (September 27, 1879) says— " Attention has of late been turned by correspondents of Manchester to the poor children who are forced to pick up a living in the streets at most untimely hours. The writer of a letter in the Manchester Guardian, for example, recounts how within half an hour of midnight he was accosted by a lad of about eight years of age, who desired him to buy a box of matches. The lad was crying bitterly, and followed the writer a long way, beseeching him to give him a penny for the box. Having been cheated several times by children affecting great distress, the writer ordered him rather gruffly to begone ; and he slunk away, sobbing in a manner which went to the very heart. Conscience compelled the hearer to turn back and question the boy. He replied through his tears that he dared not go home, because his mother would ' leather ' him, as he had had bad luck that day. This precious mother, it seems, had given him three-'halfpence in the morning, and told him that he must not return until he had earned sevenpence halfpenny, or else he would 'catch it.' He invested one penny of this capital in two halfpenny boxes of matches, which he sold in the course of the day for one penny each. Then he bought another two, but had only managed to dispose of one of them, leaving him at that late hour with only twopence halfpenny and a box of matches. His little brother had gone home before him, and he could not help crying, as his mother always SOCIAL RESULTS. 257 ' leathered ' him if he did not come home with the money in time. The lad was covered with rags and tatters from head to foot, but he had an intelligent face, and spoke both correctly and modestly. After rewarding him for his information, the writer turned homeward, meditating on the horrible fact that, with all our civilization, there should exist parents who enslave their children, and deliberately make their lives a blight to them and a curse to society. " Subsequent revelations and reports of other letter writers have shown beyond all doubt that children thus abused always have parents who spend most of their substance in drink. The child ragged and ill-used is ever the drunkard's child. Education, clothing, food, home care, all are swallowed down with the drink, and the poor child is sent out with curses and threats to force sales on a compassionate public, instead of being folded at home in the arms of parental love. The philanthropists, whose feelings are shocked on the discovery of so much cruelty, at once set to work to devise some petty ameliorations and palliatives. The children must, forsooth, be taken from their parents, and thrust into industrial schools. Or there must be a law passed forbidding children's sale of matches or papers in the streets after a certain hour in the evening. All the while the truth is overlooked, that so sure as the existing cases of parental cruelty and of children's nocturnal street-cries are dealt with, a new crop of children, equally wretched, and equally needing deliver- ance from their parents, will arise to point the finger of scorn at the labours of the philanthropist. " When a tree is evil, and brings forth evil fruit in ceaseless profusion, they do nothing who confine their efforts to the fruit. Clear away one crop, another still succeeds ; and so it will be till Philanthropy, tired out, folds her hands and sits down in sheer despaii\ But to kill the root is to cut off the fruit ; and they who seek to stop the sad fi'uit of drunken cruelty to children must go down under the cruelty, which is the fruit, to the drunken- ness, which is the stem of the tree, and again below that to the liquor traffic, which is the root. Until this is done nothing is done. The bitter crop removed, renews itself. The hellish bough is torn away from the tree for a moment; but uno avulso, non deficit alter." 258 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Comparison between the revenue re- turns from drink in prosperous »nd un- prosperous years. Address by Cardinal IVIanning. Important evidence of Charles Perhaps tlie best and most conclusive proof that drink causes poverty, infinitely raore than poverty causes drink, is seen by a comparison of the revenue returns in prosperous and unprosperous years. In the measure that England is prosperous the drink bill increases ; on the other hand, in the measure that trade and wages are depressed and the country poorer thereby, the drink bill diminishes ; but if poverty were the cause of drink, it would seem as if this would be exactly reversed, i.e., in years of prosperity there should be less intemperance, and vice versa. " Can it be for a moment imagined that this great commercial country, so wise and so skilful in all finance, in all investments, and with its eyes open, can go on year by year wasting a hundi^ed and forty millions of money in the production of intoxicating drink, which when drunk is gone ? Can there be a more complete waste ? Expend it in the drainage of England and the culture of the land, and there would be bread for the hungry mouths of the people. Expend it in manufacture of cloth, and there would be no man and no child without a coat upon his back. Expend it in the building of houses fit for human habitation, and there would not be a working man and his family without a roof over his head. We talk of profitable investments, and then waste a hundred and thirty millions in the most unprofitable investment that can be conceived by the imagination of man. Nay, I will go further. It is not only waste. It has a harvest. It is a great sowing broadcast. And what springs from the furrow? Deaths; mortality in every form; disease of every kind ; crime of every dye ; madness of evevj intensity ; misery beyond the imagination of man ; sin, which it sur- passes the imagination to conceive." * That poverty, even when honourable and averse to drink, can be coerced by its dire necessities into filling the publican's till is seen in the digest of the Parliamentary evidence on Drunkenness in 1834. " (Charles Saunders called in and examined.) " 383. What is your occupation ? — Coal-whipper. * From an address on temperance delivered at Newcastle-on- Tyne, by Cardinal Manning, and reported in the Alliance News, Sep- tember 9, 1882. SOCIAL KESULTS 259 " 334. Have the goodness to state to the committee Saunders the manner in which coal-whippers are engaged and paid, parlia-''^^ — I have been in the habit of obtaining a living by coal- mentary whipping for the last ten years. When I want employ- on'Drinkin ment (me and the likes of me, of course) I have to go to 1834. the publican to get a job, to ask him for a job ; and he tells me to go and sit down and he will give me an answer by-and-by. I go and sit down, and if I have twopence in my pocket, of, course I am obliged to spend it, with a view of getting a job; and probably, when two or three hours have elapsed, by that time there is about fifty or sixty people come on the same errand to the same person, for a job. He keeps us three or four hours there ; and then he comes out, and he looks round among us, and he knows those well that can drink the most, and those are the people that obtain employment first. Those that cannot drink a great deal, and think more of their family than others do, cannot obtain any employment ; those that drink the most get the most employment. When the men are made up for the ship, we go to work the next day morning ; but we have to take what the publican calls the alloiuance, such as a quartern of rum or three half- quarterns, or a pot of beer ; then they have to take a pot of beer off in a bottle on board — what he calls beer, but not fit for a man to drink generally speaking; what I call poison. I have actually teemed it overboard myself, before I could drink it; I could not drink it, although I have been sweating and as thirsty as a man could be, and have put it overboard, and gone and dipped my bottle in a backet of water. "337. In the after part of the day, when your work was over, where did you go then ? — Then when we had done our day's work we came on shore, and we had to go into the house again ; and perhaps we might want a shilling or two to get our families a little support. The landlord would tell us to go and sit down in the taproom, and he would give us some by-and-by, and he would keep us there till nine or ten at night; fii'st we would go for a pint or a pot, to see whether he was getting ready, for we dared not go empty handed, without a pot or a pint, or to call for something by way of excuse. After keeping us there until nine or ten at night, then he would give us half a crown or three shillings. 260 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Report of the special sanitary^ commis- sioner of the Lancet ia 1872. " 340. What would have happened if you had refused to spend money in drink ? — Then we could have no employ- ment ; and, moreover, if you had had what you thought was requisite, if he did not think it was sufficient, he would add more than what you had actually contracted for ; and if you refused to pay this, and said, ' I have not had so much, I won't pay it ' — ' Oh, won't you ? If you do not, here is your money what you say it is ; go out and never come in here again.' " 341. Have you known anybody refused employment because they would not contribute to the publican's demand for drink ? — Yes ; I could find fifty. " 342. Who have lost their employment because they would not drink so much as the publican wished ? — Yes, I could. " 343. Could you not engage yourself to the captain of the ship without going to the publican ? — No ; for the publicans are some of them shipowners, and they are all intermixed through the trade by one thing and another, so that the captain or owner of the ship gives the favour to the publican to employ the whippers." A practical illustration of the degradation brought about by drink and poverty combined is furnished in the report of the special sanitary commissioner of the Lancet, made in 1872, in which the social condition of the poor at Liverpool is thus described : — * " There is here a form of poverty which can neither be coaxed nor coerced ; fines are useless, imprisonment vain. There are upwards of six thousand cellars occupied by permission of the law, where at night drunkenness and dirt, wretchedness and rags beggar description. The air is redolent with broken sewers and human ordure ; it is polluted with odours of filthy persons, foul rags, and stinking fish. The very walls exhale a stench of vermin and contagion. In not one room in ten is there a bed- stead, in not one a wholesome bod. The inmates lie upon the floor, from which they are separated by a bit of straw or a bundle of dii-ty rags. Mothers and sons, fathers and daughters, brothers and sisters, relations and strangers of both sexes, lie indiscriminately together, many * Since this date the sanitary condition of Liverpool slums has been much improved. SOCIAL RESULTS. 261 of them all but naked, locked in each others' arms for warmth." In this fearful picture we see a condition — probably The meaning chiefly due to intempei'ance, certainly greatly intensified and *" g^^^""^ rendered hopeless by it — in which all distinctions by which degradation. we know one another as worthy of life, hope, and love have been destroyed. Six thousand such cellars in one city ! Why, then, in that one city alone there must be physical and moral poison enough to infect the whole social structure of the world. But when we remember that Liverpool is not alone, that there is no city without some such compost- heap of vice, and remember, too, that unity of the race which asserts itself, in vice as well as in virtue, over all the most cleverly contrived and impregnable barriers of class and caste, so that there is a mutual trickling and percolating interchange of life-essence through the whole stratification we call society ; then we begin to see some- thinof of the tremendous danger and horror of the evil o ... that has been suffered to root itself with the life-roots of the race. To illustrate in part what I mean by saying that the unity of the race overcomes the barriers of caste and class, and asserts itself in vice as in virtue, I may point to the invincible levelling power of the sexual passion — the power given to us to inspire us to the highest plane of moral being possible to this life, but by which we can, if we will, sound the lowest abysses. It is the one touch of natirre making the whole world kin ; making it kin on the pure and lofty plane of pure and perfect home-life where sons and daughters gi*ow up in the strengthening light of the unselfish love which first united the husband and wife, and now binds and inspires them in fatherhood and motherhood ; making it kin in the populous world of the merely pleasure-seeking ; and again making it kin in those depths where it has sunk into the low and ravenous sensual instinct of prey. Wherever man exists, this one power, dominating for good or ill, is our common inheritance and keeps oblite- rating all external distinctions, drawing the race together, and cementing life-relations in the present, and for posterity, despite the strongest contrast and most insur- mountable obstacles. 2G2 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. " Why sbuuld Lon- don wait ? " Daily Telegraph, Oct. 25, 1883. Out of some of tliose six thousand cellars in Liverpool — nests of utmost vice and degradation as they are — some young girl may emerge, who, in spite of rags and dirt, and every bad inheritance, may be fair, may have both wit and pretty looks enough to catch the fancy of some gentleman's son ; and if drink has done its usual work of strangling the moral Kfe within him as inheritance and environments have done it for her — the worst wrong that may follow does follow, and if a child is born and lives, it may by an advance in mental endowment take its vile moral heritage where yet wider nemesis will be wi-ought. For if those who dwell always in the safety and refine- ment of real homes, imagine that the slums and dens of vice are far fi'om them and theirs^that there can be nothing in common between them, I must in conscience hint that they may be making the dangerous mistake of under-estimating the damning power of alcohol to obliterate just those refined distinctions in which they trust. Alcohol can and does lead the husbands, fathers, brothers, and sons of just such prosperous homes into just such pits of infamy. They do not go at once and with their eyes open, but step by step, as surely as the drinking habit is once formed. For alcohol is not satisfied with making men act weakly and wrongly ; it will have them gravitate to worse and worse, and is cunning to devise always some lower and more blasting shame. It develops also that other cunning of madness, quickness and watchful subtlety to veil its ravages and deceive the solicitude of loving ones. And the result is not only that besides the family we know of, sheltered under the same roof with us, there are half- brothers and half-sisters whom we never know, homeless wanderers in friendless guilt and shame, or tenants of early graves that cry louder than Abel's blood ; but the evil comes home and the good wife and mother is made to un- consciously impart the secret poison to her latest born. Under the heading, " Why should London wait ? " the Daily Telegraph (October 25, 1883) says, " It is, however, be- ginning to be known Avhat cruel sights and scenes the wealth and magnificence of London conceal. Men, women, and children by hundreds of thousands exist among us in a condition Avhich savages would scorn and beasts refuse to bear. Without light, air, fresh water, or any of the veriest SOCIAL RESULTS. 263 necessities of human life, they are forced to congregate in places wliere not only morality but the merest decency becomes impossible. A majority among them are indus- trious and patient people, eager to work while they can ; for thieves, prostitutes, tramps, and beggars are, most of them, better lodged than the victims of the vestry and the caucus whose cause is now at stake. Into rotten and reek- ing tenements they are di-iven helplessly by the process which rebuilds the capital without making rightful provi- sion for its weakest citizens, and their cry is drowned and their sorrows overwhelmed in the ocean of existence which surges around them. 'Every room,' says an explorer, 'in these rotten and reeking tenements houses a family, often two. In one cellar a sanitary inspector reports finding a father, mother, three children, and four pigs ! In a room a missionary discovered a man ill with small-pox, his wife just recovering fi'om her eighth confinement, and the children running about half- naked and covered with dirt. Here are seven people living in one underground kitchen, and a little dead child lying in the same chamber. Elsewhere is a poor widow, her three children, and a child who had been dead thirteen days. Her husband, who was a cabman, had shortly before committed suicide. Here lives a widow and her six children, including one daughter of twenty-nine, one of twenty-one, and a son of twenty-seven. Another apartment contains father, mother, and six children, two of whom are ill with scarlet fever. In another nine brothers and sisters, from twenty-nine years downwards, live, eat, and sleep together. Here is a mother who turns her children into the street in the early evening because she lets her room for immoral purposes until long after midnight, when the poor little wretches creep back again, if they have not found some miserable shelter elsewhere.' Where there are beds they are simply heaps of dirty rags, shavings, or straw. Crime also, as a matter of course, spreads like a fungus in decaying timber, where a child must make fifty-six gross of match-boxes a day to earn the ten shillings a week which thieving will easily bring him. There are women who work at the needle seventeen hours per diem for the pay of one shilling ! In St. George's-in-the-East large numbers of children toil with their tiny fingers all day making sacks at a farthing apiece ! One poor woman was found, con- 264 THE FOUNDATIOX OF DEATH. sumptive and emaciated, with a drunken husband and five star\ang children ' eating a few green peas.' In a room at Wych Street, ' on the third floor, over a marine store dealer's, there was, a short time ago, an inquest as to the death of a little baby. A man, his wife, and three children were li\4ng in that room. The infant was the second child, who had died, poisoned by the foul atmosphere ; and this dead baby was cut open in the one room where its parents and brothers and sisters lived, ate, and slept, because the parish had no mortuary and no room in which post- mortems could be performed ! ' In such abodes what room is there for honesty, or faith, or hope ? Virtue herself departs, ashamed, hopeless, and silent, fi^om ' homes ' where she has nothing to offer, nothing to promise ; where Vice itself is so miserable that it is more to be pitied than reproached. " These are but slight and simple examples of the state of things prevalent in the capital of Great Bi'itain ; widely, notoriously, terribly prevalent ; of cases to be paralleled by thousands and scores of thousands behind the splendid streets and wealthy squares of London." The Bitter From the little pamphlet entitled The Bitter Cry of cast°Lmtd!on Outcast London, * I quote the following (showing the close (1883). relation between drink, poverty, and shame) : — " The low parts of London are the sink into which the filthy and abominable fi^om all parts of the country seem to flow. Entire courts are filled with thieves, prostitutes, and libe- rated convicts. The misery and sin caused by drink in these districts have often been told, but these horrors can never be set forth either by pen or artist's pencil. In the district of Euston Road is one public-house to every hundred people", counting men, women, and children. Children who can scarcely walk are taught to steal, and mercilessly beaten if they come back from their daily expeditions without money or raoney's worth. Many of them are taken by the hand or carried in the arms to the gin-palace, and not seldom may you see mothers urging and compelling their tender infants to drink the fiery liquid. Lounging at the doors, and lolling out of windows, and prowling about street corners were pointed out several Avell-known members of the notorious band of ' Forty Thieves,' who, often in conspiracy with abandoned women, go out after dark to * Issued by the Committee of tlie London Congregational Union. SOCIAL EESULTS. 265 rob people in Oxford Street, Regent Street, and other thoroughfares. These particulars indicate but faintly the moral influences from which the dwellers in these squalid regions have no escape, and by which is bred ' infancy that knows no innocence, youth without modesty or shame, maturity that is mature in nothing but suffering and guilt, blasted old age that is a scandal on the name we bear.' " § 65. The mortality from drink has been a much-disputed Mortality question, and the many public utterances by men accounted both competent and veracious have for some reason re- ceived but slight attention fi^om the public ; and it is perhaps not well known that the average figures now generally accepted as approximately true have been com- puted as long ago as in 1839. In the Rev. B. Parsons' statement by Anti-Bacchus (1839) 1 find the following : — " At an inquest ^™"®'" . held June, 1839, on a person who had died from the effects isse. of intemperance, Mr. Wakley, coroner, made these remarks : ' I think intoxication likely to be the cause of one-half the inquests that are held.' Mr. Bell, the clerk of the inquests, observed ' that the proportion of deaths so occasioned were supposed to be three out of five.' ' Then,' said Mr. Wakley, ' there are annually 1500 inquests in the Western Division of Middlesex, and, according to that ratio, nine hundred of the deaths are produced by hard diinking.' On another occasion Mr. Wakley said, ' Gin may be thought the best friend I have ; it causes me to hold annually one thousand inquests more than I should otherwise hold. Besides these, I have reason to believe that from ten to fifteen thousand persons in this metropolis die annually fi'om the effects of gin-dinnking, upon whom no inquests are held.' These remarks appeared in most of the public papers of the time, and are the more valuable because Mr. Wakley, not long before he became coroner, spoke in the House of Commons rather sneeringly of teetotalers ; the observations made above were therefore extorted fi'om him by the scenes he had witnessed." In his Mortality of Intemperance (London, 1879) Dr. Testimony Kerr says, " When, a few years ago, I instituted an man'^kerrr inquiry into the causes contributing to the mortality in the practice of several medical friends, it was with the avowed object of demonstrating and exposing the utter falsity of 266 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. the perpetual teetotal assertion, that 60,000 drunkards died every year in the United Kingdom. " I had not long pui'sued this line of inquiry before it was made clear to me that there was little, if any, exagge- ration in these temperance statistics ; and when asked to present the final results of my investigation to the last Social Science Congress, I was compelled to admit that at least 120,000 of our population annually lost their lives through alcoholic excess — 40,500 dying from their own in- temperance, and 79,500 from accident, violence, poverty, or disease arising from the intemperance of others." The Marveian Society Report concludes that fourteen per cent, of the mortality among adults is due to alcohol ; i.e., about 39,000 in England and Wales, or 52,000 in Great Britain ; thus the Harveian computation exceeds Dr. Kerr's by 11,500. On the occasion of the Jubilee of the British Medical Association (held at Worcester, August, 1882), Dr. Kerr reiterated his statements, and no one disputed their accuracy ; it was even admitted that he was within the truth. SirWm.Gnii In a June number of the I^cho (1883) appeared a infanticide? po'^'erful plea for the protection of infants, entitled Alco- holic Infanticide. It stated that Sir W. Gull considered alcohol as the " most destructive agent among the causes of infant mortality," and cited the evidence of the coroners concerning the fearfully frequent suffocation of helpless little ones under the heavy bodies of their torpidly drunk mothers — a kind of accident known as ' overlaying ; ' and alluded to the weekly records of child-murder committed, not from stupidity, but in the direct violence of the dxink- frenzy, by braining the babe or casting it in the fire." The Echo quoted Darwin, and Drs. Edis, Richardson, Bree, and Elam, as testifying to great infant mortality from drink, and to the evil hereditary results for those who sui'vived. The Lancet of about the same date suggested a frightful significance for the overlaying mortality, to the effect that it was by no means always accidental. Mortality An appalling and pathetic feature in the drink mortality deaiere."^'^*" Hst, and a most conclusive proof that drink is a foundation SOCIAL RESULTS. 267 of death, is ftirnislied by the statistics of death among the liquor dealers themselves. Dr. Kerr, in the essay just quoted from, says, " The Estimate of mortality of piiblicans is so serious that the Registrar- '' General's reports show that 138 die for every 100 em- ployed in 70 leading occupations ; and in his last annual report he draws attention to the remarkable increase in the rate of mortality among grocers at every group of ages since they have begun to retail spirits." Mr. David Lewis, ex-raagistrate of the city of Edin- statement burgh, in his Drink Problem and its Solution (1881), says DavidLewis. — " So fi^equent have premature deaths become among publicans, that one of the most wealthy and popular life assurance associations in the kingdom (the Scottish Widows' Fund) has issued a circular to all its agents in- structing them that in future the life of no publican can be insured upon any terms whatever. This example, we observe, is being followed by several other associations in this country and America." And the General Assurance Office, on the 18th of Notice issued February, 1881, issued a notice, which stated — " That in A"ssurance consequence of the excessive mortality experienced in the Office in . «/ L ^ 1881 case of innkeepers whose lives have been assured with the company, it is hereby notified that from this date the directors will not undertake these risks on any terms." Concerning the mortality among public-house keepers, statement Dr. Edmunds, in his Use of Alcohol as a Medicine (1867), Edmunds, says — • " You will find that thirty per thousand of those die every year where the normal average of other men is fifteen — that is, where one workman dies two publicans die. Can we account for that in any way ? What should we expect if we looked into these facts ? The publican is better clothed than the working man ; he is better housed and better fed, and less exposed to casualty and accident which occur to men in laborious, mechanical, and other trades ; and therefore we should expect that the publican would live longer than the ordinary working man. And so he would, if it were not for this one fact which comes in — he is mixed up with alcoholic liquors ; he is not, as a rule, a drunkard, but he takes that which damages his stomach. 268 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. a good many times a day, out of com.pliment to some friend who asks him to take a drink ! " Kelative longevity of drinkers and abstainers, as furnished by the United Kingdom Temperance and General Provident Institution for Mutual Life Insurance. As to the relative healthfulness of temperance or drink the tables yearly made up by the United Kingdom Temper- ance and General Provident Institution for Mutual Life Insurance (established 1840) afford conclusive practical evidence. The secretary of this institution, Mr. Thomas Cash, kindly furnished me with the following condensed but lucid statement : — Expected Claims. 1866-70 (five years) 1871-75 (five years) 1876-80 (five years) 1881-82 (two years) 549 723 933 439 Total (17 years) ... 2644 Temperance Section. Actual. General Section. Expected Claims. Actual. 411 1008 944 511 1268 1330 651 1485 1480 288 647 585 1861 4408 4339 Statement of W. B. Robin- son. Chief Constructor, R.N. It will be seen from this that the claims in the tem- perance section are only a little over seventy per cent, of the expectancy, while in the general section they are but slightly below the expectancy. W. B. Robinson, Chief Constructor, R.N., in a paper on The Value of Life being increased hy taking no Intoxicating Drinks, read before the Economic Section of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, September 22, 1883, said that " The Sceptre Life Associa- tion states that during ' the eighteen years of our history ending December 31, 1882, we had 116 deaths in our temperance section, against 270 expected deaths,' and in ' this year, 1883, the same disproportion prevails, as we have had fifty-one deaths, and only seven of them on the lives of abstainers, whereas to be equal with non-abstainers there should have been nineteen.' " In the Emperor Life Assurance Office they have a temperance branch, and they assure lives at a ' less rate than moderate drinkers, thus giving them an immediate bonus of from £3 to £7, according to age, on each £100 assurance.' " In some accidental offices the assumed superior lives SOCIAL RESULTS. 269 of abstainers is recognized by a charge of 20 per cent, less to teetotal than to moderate drinkers." * § 66. Schlegel said, when this century was in its dawn — " Drinking is the principal cause of insanity and suicide in schiegei on England, Germany, and Russia, of licentiousness and drink as a gambling in France, and of bigotry in Spain." sanitvand Dr. F. Ganghofner, of Prague, in his address on the ^^i'^''^'^- Influence of Alcohol on Man (Prague, 1880), says, "It is Dr. Gang- estimated that in the asylums of America, England, and Hefner's */ ' o ' cstinia,t6 of Holland, the total number insane from drink ranges from alcoholic 15 to 20 per cent., and from 20 to 28 per cent, in the In^'Am^rica asylums of France." England, and In the Journal of Mental Science (April, 1869), Dr. ^''^^'"^■ Lockhart-Robertson computes for England and Germany, Dr. Lock- in 1844, one lunatic to every 808 inhabitants, and in 1868 so^^^o^l"*" one lunatic for every 432 inhabitants. putation for The third report on intemperance before the Select Gefma"ny'^"'* Committee of the House of Commons shows, from 1865 to House of 1875, an increase in population of 13 per cent., in lunacy E°p™t°for of 67 per cent., and in drunkenness of 130 per cent. from isea Mr. Hoyle states that " The number of lunatics in *° ^** ^' asylums and workhouses in the United Kingdom will be Mr. Hoyie on slightly over 100,000, besides many not in asylums. In fnsan?ty^in England and Wales, in the year 1860, there were 38,038, England and but in 1880 they had increased to 71,191, being nearly double, although the population had only increased 28 per cent." And I may add that, according to the last report of the Commissioners of Lunacy, "the total number of lunatics, Last report idiots, and persons of unsound mind, reo-istered as being: ^^}^^ "^'o™- • -^^ ^ i ixr i i t p t missioners of insane, m England and Wales, on the 1st of January, 1883, Lunacy. was 76,765 ! " • Dr. Edgar Shepherd, Medical Superintendent of Colney Hatch Lunatic Asylum, stated a few years ago publicly that Dr. Shep- he believed that 40 per cent, of the insanity in Great herd's state- Britain was the result of drink. f In his annual report for * For further information on this most practical point, see The Comparative Death-Rate of Total Abstainers and Moderate Drinlcers by Dr. C. R. Drysdale, in Med. Temp. Journal (Jan., 1884), The Vital Statistics of Total Abstinence, by the Rev. Dawson Burns (March, 1884). t Med. Chirurgical Journal, 1876. 270 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Statements by Earl Sbaftesbury. 1877, Dr. Shepherd repeated this statement in these words : — " A careful analysis of the year's admissions clearly established a percentage of more than 28 as due to this cause (intemperance), and I am persuaded, from the character of the individuals and the form of their malady, in other cases where the causation is not assigned or can- not accurately be traced, that an addition of 12 per cent, may directly or indirectly be attached to the same origin. Thus we have an approximate record of 40 per cent, of the madness of Middlesex as due to an unavoidable cause, and that cause the growing passion for drink." And again in January, 1882, he said, "I have seen no reason to alter my opinion, so frequently expressed, as to the part played by alcoholic intemperance in its causal relation to insanity. Ko doubt many cases occur in which some mental disturbance, generated by what is termed a moral cause — notably loss of money or friends — leads, in the first place, to excessive imbibition ; but I am per- suaded that the prime mover of all that is disarranging is intemperance. And Dr. Pritchard Davies, Medical Superintendent of the Barming Heath Asylum, says in the report for November, 1883, " Believing, as I do, that the predis- posing causes of insanity are very numerous, 1 am equally convinced that but for the potent exciter alcohol, insanity would be decreased by at least 50 per cent." Earl Shaftesbury, permanent chairman of the Lunacy Commission since 1845 (and acting chairman for many years, having been on the Commission some fifty years), in his reply to Hon. Stephen Cane, chairman of the Lunacy Commission of the House of Commons, 1877, said that in his opinion " intemperance is the cause of fully two-thirds of the insanity that prevails either in the drunkards themselves or their children ; " and in a recent address in the House of Lords he stated that "fully six-tenths of all the cases of insanity to be found in these realms and in America arise from no other cause than intem- perance." * * If the reader will examine the table of causes from the thirty- seventh Report of the Commissioners of Lunacy, July, 1883 (see Appendix), and remember that to this percentage of lunacy we may fairly add a large percentage of the other causes as being indirectly SOCIAL KESULTS. 271 Mr. Mulhall, tbe -world-statistician, in his contribution on Insanity, Suicide, and Civilization, to the Contemporary Review (June, 1883), scouts Lord Shaftesbury's estimate, but admits that insanity in England caused by drink amounts to nearly one-third of the total insanity of the British kingdom ; besides which, he numbers 25,800 idiots as owing their condition to drunken parentage. Dr. Gilchrist, M.D., Medical Superintendent of the Dr. Gii- Crichton Royal Institution, Dumfries, which has an average ^o"y ** ''^*''' of some five hundred inmates yearly, stated before the Lunacy Commission of 1877 that the larger proportion of dipsomaniacs are " the most hopeless, in fact, of all cases of insanity ; they are constitutionally defective." Mr. Heatou, one of the Commissioners of Lunacy, recently mentioned to me a case of a bi'illiant lady who had now for the thirtieth time been brought to the asylurn insane from drink. In the above-mentioned article Mr. Mulhall also makes this peculiar statement : — " No one ever yet went mad from wine, any more than from eating cabbage, although the ancients had that im- pi-ession. It is when nations discard the use of wine for stronger stimulants that insanity spreads devastation among the masses." French statistics of deaths for 1883 show that in three French provinces, whose population was not one-tenth of that in five others, but whose consumption of drink was three times as great, there were 140 suicides, while in the other five departments there were only sixteen ! As at least 20 to 28 per cent, of the insanity in French asylums is alcoholic, and as wine is the chief drink of the Frenchman, the question is — was it wine or cabbage ? In a letter to the Times (September 5, 1883), William Mr. Hoyie Hoyle says, " The returns of lunacy show that its increase fynac^"'^"''*^ has been even greater than that of crime. In 1852 the England and numbers of lunatics in England and Wales were 21,158 ; in ^^*^®^- 1881 the numbers were 73,113." occasioned by drink (heredity over one-half), it will be apparent that Lord Shaftesbury's report is not likely to prove an esacrgeration ■when this subject has received even more close scientific investigation than at present. 272 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Dr. T. S. Clouston,* in his lecture on The Effects of the Excessive Use of Alcohol on the Mental Functions of the Brain, delivered to the students of the University of Edinburgh (December 19, 1883), said, "We know as a statistical fact that from fifteen to tvrenty per cent, of the actual insanity of the country is produced by the excessive use of alcohol. In that case, as we have about one person to every thi^ee hundred in the population insane, it follows that one person in every two thousand of our people, counting men, women, and children, become insane, and deprived of their reason, of their power of action, of their power of enjoyment, and of their personal liberty from this cause. This makes about 17,500 pex-sons at any one given time in the British Empire who are so incapacitated by reason of mental alienation, produced through the excessive and continuous use of alcohol. These people are as good as dead while they are insane ; they do no work for the world or in the world, and all that makes life worth having to them, they are deprived of. In these cases you have got to the acme of the bad effects of alcohol on the mental functions of the brain ; you have arrived, as it were, at the worst that alcohol can do to a man's mental functions, and you will all admit that it is a bad enough result, and it occurs in the large number of cases I have mentioned. " But you must remember that these numbers are merely of those so well known as to be available for statistics, merely the registered persons who have been so ill as to have been sent to asylums through the excessive use of alcohol. For every one of these who had become really insane, there are no doubt a large number who have become partially affected in mind, but not to such an extent as that it has been necessary to deprive them of their liberty, but who, nevertheless, are aft'ected in mind through the excessive use of alcohol to some extent, and who are many of them partially insane." And W. J. Corbet, M.P., in a striking paper. Is Insanity on the Increase ? {Fortnightly Eevieiv, April, 1884) says that after being engaged " for many years, and under special circumstances, in studying the statistics of insanity, * Physician Superintendent of the Eoyal Edinburgh Asylum at Momingside, the largest insane asylum in Scotland. SOCIAL RESULTS. 273 I^haye reluctantly come to the conclnsion that facts and figures establish clearly the progressive growth of the malady." He summarizes his facts and figures in the subjoined table : — Date. Country. No. of insane. Population. Ratio of insane per 1000. 1862 England Ireland Scotland Total England Ireland Scotland Total England Ireland Scotland Total 41,129 8,055 6,341 20,336,476 5,798,967 3,062,294 2-02 1-36 21 55,525 29,197,737 1-81 1872 58,640 10,767 7,606 23,074,600 5,368,696 3,339,226 2-54 2-04 2-26 77,013 31,782,522 2-41 1882 75,072 13,444 10,335 25,798,922 5,294,438 3,695,456 9-90 2-54 2-80 98,851 34,788,814 2-8 And thus comments thereon : " It is singular to note that, save that the ratio of insane to sane is greatest in England and least in Irelaud, the conditions through- out are so alike as to be almost identical. The actual growth of numbers is continuous and regular, as if influenced by some inscrutable law ; there is a steady unchecked cun^ent of increase, in accommodation, expen- diture, numbers, and, strangest of all, in ' cures.' It would be only wearisome to enter more fully into statisti- cal details ; any one who wishes and has leisure can scrutinize them for himself. The plain fact stands out, however others may try to disguise it in words, that in the brief course of two decades the insane in the three kingdoms have nearly doubled in number, in spite of the most elaborate and costly means provided to cure them. There is, moreover, another alarming feature, in that we evidently do not yet know the worst. The ominous words, ' inadequate accommodation ' and 'increase T 274 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Sanger on alcohol as a cau'fe of prostitution. of provision,' run ttrongli the whole series of reports fix)m beginning to end." After saying that alcohol is a ctief cause in the pro- duction of insanity, and having quoted the already mentioned statement made by Lord Shaftesbury before the Select Committee, Mr. Corbet says — " I go a step further, and hold that there is abundant evidence to prove that to dissipation, drunkenness, and moral depravity, either directly or consequentially by transmission to the next generation, is to be charged an immense proportion of the annual increase of lunacy. No person of authority, I think, will be found to deny that evil and corrupt living in the parents bears fruit in an unhealthy state both of body and mind in their offspring. In the lower animals the transmission not only of generic qualities, but even of individual singulai'ities, is a familiar fact ; so with mankind it is not to be expected that a pure stream will issue from a polluted source ; and how foul and corrupt that source must be, any one who sees the habits of the swarms of unfortunate creatures who nightly crowd the streets of any of our great cities may determine for himself. ... It is said that people nowadays are impatient of restraint, and betray a tendency to abandon all attempt at self-discipline and to yield to every impulse, whether good or bad. If true, it is sad indeed, for it is, and from time immemorial has been, an indication of national decay. The great empires of old perished, not from sudden and violent convulsions, but from the moral degradation of their people, from internal rottenness amounting to national insanity. Quern deus vult perdere prius dementaty In Sanger's History of Prostitution, its Extent, Causes, and Effects (New York, 1858), we read — " Apart from the drinking system, which I believe to be the most prolific source of prostitution in Britain, the following may be stated as among the principal causes : one-fourth from being servants in inns and public-houses and beer-shops, etc. Were the disuse of alcoholic drinks, except under medical treatment, to become general, in six months we should be rid of prostitution by at least one- half." * * In the House of Commons' Committee on Drink (1834) it waa SOCIAL RESULTS. 275 In a summing lap of the general results brought about summary of m this country (England) by drink, I can hardly do better ^'J'nk ?aid "" than quote the results summarized in the voluminous report before the on drink laid before the Belgian Chambers of Representa- chambers by tives by the then Minister of Instruction, Frere-Orban Frere-Orbaa (Brussels, 1868), in which the following facts are given as the drink results for England : — 1. Nine-tenths of the paupers (of whom, according to Hoyle, there were over three and a half millions in 1881). 2. Three-fourths of the criminals. 3. One-halt' the diseases. 4. One-third of the insanity. 5. Three-fourths of the depravity of children and young people. 6. One-third of the shipwrecks. As to the condition in Belgium, the London Daily News (March 8, 1884) says — " A statement just issued by the Belgian Patriotic League against Drunkenness thus sums up the present aspect of the great drink question in Belgium : The number of public-houses in that country, which was 53,000 in 1850, had increased to 125,000 in 1880, and is now 130,000. The number of suicides ■ during the last forty years has increased 80 per cent., the number of insane 104 per cent. ; of convicts 135 per cent. Of the workmen who die in the hospitals 80 per cent, are habitual drunkards. The conclusion arrived at by the league is that the Belgians are the most intemperate people in the world." § 67. As to the United States, Mr. H. A. Thomson read an able paper at the Melbourne International Conference, 1880, in which he said — " Dr. Edward Young, chief of the Bureau of Statistics, Washington, estimated the cost of liquor to the nation in Dr. Edward 1867 to be about 600,000,000 dollars. The estimate should J^^Z"'"''^^ be much greater now. Dr. Hargreaves, in Our Wasted drink bin of Resources (New York, 1876), makes the cost in 1872 to be states"'^ 735,720,048 dollars. Add to this direct cost the conse- quential cost, and we have a drain upon the nation annually of 1,500,000,000 dollars. Upon the basis of Dr. Young, stated that at a dinner-party where the guests were nearly all dis- tillers, one of them gave this toast — " The distillers' best friend, the poor prostitutes of London ! " 276 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. tlie cost of intoxicating beverages in the United States was one-sixth of the value of its manufactures, which in 1870 were 4,232,325,442 dollars ; one-fourth of all the farm pro- ductions and additions of stock in that year, valued at 2,447,538,658 dollars. All the slaughtered animals, home manufactures, fi-uit products, market garden and orchard products, which were in value 527,242,403 dollars, were 92,182,707 dollars less than the cost of our nation's di'inl: bill. In the same year oiu' drink bill was 145,621,273 dollars more than the value of all furniture and house fixtures . . . which were valued at 473,803,837 dollars, and of all the articles of wear, including boots and shoes, hats and caps, hosiery, etc., manufactured in the country. Again, the value of all the food preparations of 1870 was 19,059,539 dollars less than the cost of the nation's drink bill. We are shown by the same author that the cost of liquor for ten years is nearly two-thirds of the assessed value (9,914,780,825 dollars) of all the real estate in the United States ; while the assessed value of all the personal propei-ty (4,264,205,907 dollars) is but little more than two-thirds of our drink bill for ten yeai'S." Jir. Powell, And at the Crvstal Palace Temperance Jubilee (Sep- on'TbriTquor Member, 1882), Mr.' Powtjll, of New York, read a paper of industry of the same import, stating that — statS!"""* " There were in 1881, 5210 distilleries. These consumed 31,291,146 bushels of grain, with an aggregate production of 117,728,150 gallons of proof spirits. For the fiscal year ending June 30, 1882, the total amount of revenue to the National Treasury from distilled spirits was 69,873,408.18 dollars; from fermented liquors 16,153,920.42 dollars. The total beer production for the same period, as reported to the Internal Revenue Department, was 16,952,085 barrels. A brewers' authority gives the number of breweries at 2830, and estimates that there are 1,681,870 acres of land under cultivation for barley and hops. The author of Our Wasted Resources gives the annual liquor bill of the United States at 735,000,000 dollars. In 1880, according to the record of the Internal Revenue Department, there were of wholesale dealers in distilled spirits, 40!i5 ; of retail dealers, 166,891 ; of wholesale dealers in fermented liquors, 2065 ; of retail dealers, 8952 ; an aggregate of both whole- sale and retail dealers in both distilled and fermented SOCIAL RESULTS. 277 liquors of 181,973. Counting 1000 to a regiment, we have a liqaor-selling army of 181 regiments, commissioned by the Government of the United States to perpetuate the kingdom of unrighteousness and to obstruct the onward progi'ess of the temperance reform." A recent number of the Xew York Temperance Advocate The New gives the following summaiy of liquor revenue in the .United States : — Fiscal years ended June 30. 1863 1864 1865 1866 1867 1868 1869 1870 1871 1872 1873 1874 1875 1876 1877 1878 1879 1880 1881 1882 Receipts from dis- tilled ^pilits. Dollars. Dollars. 5,176,530 1,628,934 30,329,149 2,290,009 18,731,422 3,734,928 33,268,172 5,220,553 33,542,952 6,057,501 18,655,631 5,955,769 45,071,231 6,099,879 55,606,094 6,319,127 46,281,818 7,389,502 49,475,516 8,258,498 52,099,372 9,324,938 49,444,090 9,304,680 52,081,991 9,144,004 56,426,365 9,571,281 57,469,430 9,480,789 50,420,816 9,937,052 52,570,285 10,729,320 61,185,509 12,829,803 67,153,975 13,700,241 69,873,408 16,153,920 York Temperance Advocate ou „ . „ „ the liquor Receipts from f^r- revenue of mented liquors, the United States (1863- 1882). Total dollars 904,863,756 163,130,728 The Evening Standard (February 10, 1883), quoting London from the just issued report of the National Bureau of f/*"^^. Statistics for the United States, says — liquor con- " The consumption (not manufactured) of distilled thruuited"^ spirits during the years 1878, 1879, 1880, 1881, and 1882 states, respectively, was 57,111,982, 54,278,475, 63,526,694, 70,607,081, and 73,556,036 gallons. For the same years the consumption of wines, native and foreign, was 19,812,675, 24,532,015, 28,484,428, 24,231,106, and 25,628,071 gallons. But the chief increase has been in malt liquors, which aggTe- gated 310,653,2.53, 345,076,118, 414,771,690, 444,806,373, and 527,051,236 gallons. As to the drink traffic in N'ew York city, the New York The yeiu )H\ THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH, York fferald on the num- ber of rum- shops in New York City. Dr. Howard < 'rosby on the same subject. The condi- tion of Bir- mingham in this respect ; the evidence of Mr. J. Chamber- lain, M.P. The Pall Mall Gazette on the num- ber of public- houses in proportion to tlie in- habitants of the various States of the Union. Herald (February 26, 1883) comments to the effect that there are over ten thousand rum shops in the city of New York, or one to every 125 inhabitants, one to every 25 families. "Various shops and stores where bread, meat, and groceries can be procured foot up 7326 ; in other words, there are 2749 more rum shops than food shops in New York city." But, as regards London, as long ago as 1835, Mr. Mark Moore, in his evidence before the Parlia- mentary committee on drink, stated that the number of places for the sale of distilled spirits exceeded that of bakers, butchers, and fishmongers together. In a lecture delivered also in 1883, on the Glori/ and Shame of New York, Dr. Howard Crosby said that there were 12j0P0 grog shops in New York city, or one to every hundred inhabitants. But deplorable as these figures are, they do not measure with some Great Britain fui'nishes. For example, at the annual licensing sessions held at Birmingham, September 6, 1883, deputations from the Good Templars and the United Kingdom Alliance " presented memorials against the grant- ing of new licences, and urged the magistrates to withhold others which were not absolutely necessary. Birmingham, it was stated, had 22^0 licensed Jiouses, or orj£. td'every 35, inhabitants. J. Chamberlain, MrFI7i^ his evidence before the Lords Committee on Intemperance (1879), stated that " out of seventy large towns, fifty have m ore pu blic-houses than Bir ming ham." """ Concerning public-houses in America, the Pall Mall Gazette for May 4, 1883, furnishes the following statistics: — " In N evad a there is one drinking saloon to every 65 inhabitants"; in Colorado, 'one to every Vof in California, one to every 99 ; the rest of the States supplying the following number of inhabitants to each drinking saloon : — Oregon, 176; New Jersey, 179; New York, 192; Louisiana, 200 ; Ohio, 225 ; Connecticut, 246 ; Massa- chusetts, 256 ; Delaware, 258 ; Pennsylvania, 263 ; Rhode Island, 266 ; Illinois, 267 ; Maryland, 293 ; Wisconsin, 304; Minnesota, 311 ; Missouri, 337; Michigan, 350; New Hampshire, 376 ; Iowa, 377 ; Indiana, 380 ; Kentucky, 438 ; Nebraska, 487 ; Tennessee, 525 ; Texas, 549 ; Arkansas, 554 ; Alabama, 608 ; Georgia, 612 ; Florida, 653 ; Missis- sippi, 654 ; Virginia, 693 ; North Carolina, 708 ; Maine, SOCIAL EESULTS. 279 791; Vermont, 812; West Virginia, 817; Kansas, 876; and South Carolina, 708. It tlius appears that the twelve States in which there were fewest drinking saloons were all Southern, except Vermont, and leaving out, of course, Maine and Kansas, in which States drinking saloons are prohibited hj law." Dr. Lee, of Philadelphia, in Report of Insanity (1868), Dr. Lee on gave for the year 1860 one insane person to every 1305 f,',^°n°t"^ inhabitants, and in 1868, one to every 7O0. In his Dr. wiikins Insanity and Insane Asylums (Sacramento, 1872), Dr. E. T. '"''*'*' ^'^^■ Wiikins, Commissioner in Lunacy for the State of Cali- fornia, states (p. 211) that he is of opinion intoxication is a far mightier cause of mental diseases than all other causes put together. In Alcoholic Insanity (New York, 1883), Dr. Lewis D. Dr. Mason's Mason says, " In a study of 600 cases of inebriety treated statement, at the Inebriate Asylum, Fort Hamilton, I found that 166 persons had 309 attacks of alcoholic mania in some form at various times during their periods of alcoholic addiction. In the annual report of the New York State Lunatic Asylum for 1883, of the 412 cases tabulated, in 32, or in a little less than one in 13, ' intemperance ' was stated as the exciting cause." The last United States census shows that there has been a most alarming increase in the number of lunatics and idiots during the last decade ; while the population has increased by 30 per cent., the increase of the insane is given as a little over 155 per cent. In his Manual of Psychological Medicine (New York, Dr Mann, of 1883), Dr. Mann says, "It is impossible to estimate the New York. ^' . , . • 1 T ^^ alcoholic complex influences that intemperance exerts in the produc- insanity. tion of insanity. All observers agree that it is intimately connected with, and is one of the main exciting causes of, insanity. . . . Many superintendents of foreign asylums have estimated the admissions from intemperance at 25 per cent, or higher, including not only the proximate but remote cause of the disease. This percentage will be largely increased if we take into account the great number of cases in w4iich intemperance of parents causes the insanity or idiocy of their offspring. Dr. L. Lunier estimates that 50 per cent, of all the idiots and imbeciles to be found 280 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. in the large cities of Europe have had parents who were notorious drunkards." iMaximedu And in the Revue des deux Mo7ides (1872) Maxime du Camp on the Camp savs that th'e^requency of mental diseases in Paris dnnk-petro- . ^ «' -iiiii • t ■ i-ii lomaniaof IS Very largely attributable to the insobriety which has fhe'sie-^^ enormously increased there dnring the last two years ; — that in the siege the workman drank more than he fought, and under the Com mun e drink was given out to make them figjit ; that in ni ne mo nths' time Paris consumed fiv e ti mes as much alcohol as formerly in ong year, with the I'esults of prevalence of delirium tremens, and the destructive outbreak of petrolomania. Dr. Baer on Speaking of the general passion for drink in France, tion'^^'t'hr' I^i'- Bcaer, in his Alcoholismus (Berlin, 1878), deplores the French anay effect of this evil on the nation, and states that " unpreju- driuk. ^ diced and highly intelligent men attribute the severe defeats in the last war with Germany in no small degree to the disorder, want of discipline, and incapability of resistance which has been produced and nurtured in the French army by the predominant craving for di-ink in both military and civil life.* " During the siege, Paris was seized by a mental epidemic of acute alcoholism, and alcoholism is one of the principal sources of the deeds of abomination and shame occurring Avith the rising of the Co mmu ne." Official statistics sm)w that in l5S2 there were 13,434 admissions to the French asylums. Of these, 10,184 were new cases. The total number treated in these asylums during the year was 58,760, of whom 31^00 were women and 27,000 were men ; and it is estimated that a large * In bis Hereditary Alcoholism (Medical Tliesis, Paris, 1880), Dr. Gendron says — " If we require proofs of the effects of alcoholic heredity ou stature and muscular strength, we surely find them in the recruiting registers, which show that certain districts where alcoholism prevails cannot furnish the required average of conscripts. The arrondissement of Domfront, in Normandy, consumes proportionately the largest amount of alcohol ; in that arrondissement the canton of Pussaisand the com- mune of Mantilly especially are notable for excessive drinking ; even if all the able-bodied men were taken in Pussais, the recruitment would still be insufficient, and Mantilly is in this respect below all other communes." SOCIAL RESULTS. 281 proportion of tills yearly augmenting increase is due to alcoholism. Dr. E. Lanceraux, in his essay On AlcoJwUsm and its Gonseqiiences (Paris, 1878), charges alcoholism with being a principal cause of the decrease in the population of France and other countries. " Assisted by tuberculosis," says Dr. Lanceraux, " alcoholism has long been one of the principal causes of decreased population in many quarters of the world. These two causes united have contributed much more than iron or fire to more and more reduce the number of natives of North and South America. To this also is due the progressive disparity among the inhabitants of a g-reat number of islands in the Pacific ; notably the Marquesas, Sandwich, Tahiti, and others. But we need only to observe what is going on in oar own midst to recognize alcohol as a cause of depopulation. Many statisticians and economists are justly alarmed at the deci^ease in population of one of the most favoured provinces in France, and each furnishes his own ex- planation of the fact. If we examine into the matter we find that in I^ormandy, where a great quantity of brandy is distilled, alc ohol ism is most ra mpa nt. The notion prevails there thaiT it is necessaiy to give infants wine anoKquor in order to strengtKen them. This pernicious habit, together with the general alcoholic excesses so common in Normandy, undoubtedly form one of the principal sources of the decreasing population of this rich province." In a recent address before the National Association for Dr. Baer, of the Protection of the Insane,* Dr. Baer said — ?f V"',°" , . , r> 1 ■ 1 • • alcouol anil " In comparing the number of drinking saloons m the insanity lu different provinces of the kingdom of Prussia with the '''^^^''*- number of insane, both in public institutions and in private families, as gleaned from the census report of 1871, I was enabled to show conclusively that everywhere where the number of drinking places, i.e., the consumption of alcohol, was the greatest, the ny.mber of insane was also the largest. Without doubt, to my mind, it is in alcohol that we must look for and will find the most potent cause of the develop- ment and spread of mental diseases." * American Psychological Journal (quarterly), Philadelphia (Oct. 1883). 282 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Dr. Finkei- The Quarterly Journal of Inebriety (Hartford, Con- temn ^""^ necticut, U.S.), October, 1883, says that, "According to Health Com- Dr. Finkelburg, member of the Russian Public Health the same in Commission, alcoholic liquors canse over two-fifths of all Russia. i}^Q insanity, and five-eighths of all the criminality." ( 283 ) CHAPTER XI. ORIGIN AND CAUSES OF ALCOHOLISM. § 68. It seems probable, from the great sum of testimony — so probable that it may be assumed as certain — that there was a time when the evil habit of alcoholic intoxication was unknown to man. According to Dr. Baer, many races still existing, or only recently extinct, had no knowledge of intoxicants. Dr. E. G. Eigg, in his paper On the Physiological Operation of Alcohol (Temperance Spectator, London, 1862), cites the following examples : — " The Portuguese and other Arctic navigators testify to the ignorance of the frigid zone in this particular. Columbus and his Spanish successors described a race more beautiful and refined than aborigines generally are, amongst whom no trace of an intoxicant existed. The French gave the same verdict as to the Northern American continent, and the English, under Cook, so far as Australia and the Polynesian islands are concerned, corroborate the same fact. In the penetration of Africa from its eastern or western coast, it has not been seen save as an article of importation. In fact, in every locality first developed to civilized enterprise, alcohol in any of its varieties was un- known. Those describing the early habits of the Calmuc Tartars will contest this statement, insisting thatthe favourite beverage of those savages was a fermentation of the milk of Imares. The truth" m this assertion conceded, must "'hot the"Mucated chemist at once understand that the fermentation referred to was merely the development of lactic acid by transposition of the saccharine element in the milk ? In his description of the Islands of the South iniscbief. 284 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Pacific, Melville mentions the existence of a liquor affirmed to be an intoxicant from his own observation of its apparent effect on those who partook of it. The mode of preparation, however, refutes the idea that it was a fermented fluid. It was simply the expressed juice of a herb which was drunk before fermentation could have been realized. Independently of this, we have the positive testimony of John Williams, that the American traders were the first to introduce intoxicants, and the earliest inebriators of these Pacific Islands." Origin of the But in the most remote historic period the use of intoxicants had become comparatively common, and, with the knowledge we now possess of the subtlety and stealthi- ness of these poisons, we can easily see how individuality was undermined by their use, and the natural passions changed into insatiable demands, before man really under- stood the origin of the mischief. And as his awakening to these moral effects probably took place only when the worst — the weakening of his power to resist — had been accomplished, he invented, as moral weakness always does, excuses for his excesses. He denied the evil results of which he was both the illustration and proof. He ascribed a host of excellent effects to alcohol. When these benefits failed to appear, and harm alone — harm that could not be hidden — followed upon his indulgences, he charged the trouble to Providence, or to the blind forces of nature, and posed as the victim of mysteries with which he could not hope to contend. These pleas are made, this self-deception is practised still ; yet it is man who put himself into this pit, and now at last he knows that it is so, and that it is he who most lift himself out. By his first ignorant indulgence ia intoxication, man placed himself in a continuity of circumstances which were certain to drag the individual and the race to lower and lower life-levels ; not necessarily as regards outward appearances, refinements, and comforts — civilization has made marvellous progress in these directions — but as regards the highest purposes of our being here and inhabit- ing bodies at all, as i-egards our discovering and obeying those laws of eternal truth which now and then in all of us force, if only momentary, recognition. For the light of ORIGIN AND CAUSES OF ALCOHOLISM. 285 tlie Crown lield vainly over the head of the man with the muck-rake does sometimes penetrate with a moment's flash the rubbish we grope in. § 69. The development of the race is like that of the Likeness in individual : it begins in both in an eager desire to be happy ^ent^of race and an eager search for the means of happiness. andin- The baby finds this desire satisfied with plenty of milk, xhe in^ warmth, soft couching-, and slumber. His mother's bosom, dividual . • • SG&rcnss for and the bed where he lies with her, makes his world. happiness. A little later, the horizon widens to the walls of the room and the vaguely wondered-at shining spaces which the windows show. He finds that it hurts to fall. The result is instantly unpleasant. He becomes cautious. He finds that raisins taste good, that sugar is delicious. He eats of these voraciously. The result is immediate pleasure ; and when nausea and headache follow, it is the nurse or mamma who is to blame, not his own gluttony. By the time he has learned the last fact, the raisin and sugar-eating habit is formed, and stands mightily in the way of reform. The pleasure is sweet and immediate. He tries to assure himself that the pain coming after is due to some other cause ; to anything he is willing to give up, rather than to the one thing he is unwilling to resign. He is still a child, to whom the self of the senses is all the self and all of happiness or unhappiness that exists. As he grows older, various things — the widening of his visible world, the strange interest felt in his own growth, the influence of coinpanions and circumstances, the care and guidance of his parents, etc., etc. — have all had their effect on his development ; he has learned some self- restraint, gained some little knowledge of himself, of his relations to others ; and, if his circumstances have been very favourable to moral growth, he begins to see that the senses do not compass the whole meaning of happiness, and learns that they are not even a chief part of it, that happiness lies not in having good things for himself, but in being worthy to have good things, whether they come or not ; by desiring, above all things, the rights and happiness of others ; by doing heartily all he can to bring about general happiness — universal happiness ; and thus actually, genuinely, and really being happy himself. The child, grown to maturity in this way, leads a large 286 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. life and a complete life, whatever his condition or position may happen to be, because he irradiates real happiness. He is a centre from which it rajs out, wherever that centre be placed; and this irradiation has a widening effect, like that of the circle around the stone cast in the water: it never stops short of the two shores of life — the shore of the beginning and the shore of the unending. Self-denials for the sake of others are his dearest indulgences, and as far removed in essence and effect from the morbid, anchoretic, nobody-benefiting sacrifices of St. Sinten StyliteT^and his'^lk as the s howe r of sweet spring rain is different from the o utbre ak ot a se w er. He\vill not think for one moment of the pleasure to him of an otherwise perfectly innocent indulgence, if his having, means temptation and struggle for any other. The happiness of the senses, of self, has given place to the only true or lasting happiness, the happiness of Abpu Ben-Adhem, who " loved his fellow-men ! " But if, on the other hand, the child is not well trained, if his circumstances are those of the foolishly indulged and pampered household pet, however talented and clever he may be, and whatever else he may learn, he grows up grossly and fatally ignorant of what Jig is her^for, of what is due from hyjnself to hjmself, of what is due from him to others. He is a centre from which radiates discontent, greed, tyranny— towards whom must flow C 9pst ant tribute. He will deny himself nothing that ho desires— =mo. not even for his own good, in u gh le ss for the rjgh ts and happiness of another. He is lonely, because he has spoiled himself for his own society ; and over those who must be with him he exerts an influence which, however it may stir disgust, also contaminates and gradually di\ags them into more or less real fellowship with him ; for the sp ecta cle of s elfish ness, continually triumphing in its exactions, is one oi the most dete rior ating in its effects upon those who must constantly beholii^t. And especially great is the ascendency of this kind of evil with the individual and with society, when it is accompanied by the intellectual flash es and ecc gnt ric humours, the shallow, sudden gen££jj^ities — purely for sensati on sa ke, but cited as virtues — which convivial circlg s so much affect. The race ^g ^jj^j^ ^^^ individual, so with the race. In its infancy ORIGIN AND CAUSES OF ALCOHOLISM. 287 it found the taste of alcohol as the babe fonnd the sugar — searches for sweet. The pain that came after it, it would not heed, and ^^pp^'^^^s- when at last forced to heed by overwhelming evil results, it sought, like the sugar- nauseated child, to secure itself in its now all-enthralling habit bj evasions and specious reasonings. Later on, as the race grew into knowledge of things good and evil, we have seen how, in spite of great general advancement in many things — in spite of enormous strides in all directions of scientific, philosophical, artistic, and material knowledge — in spite, too, of what steam and elec- tricity have done to melt and forge the nations, tribes, and peoples into one brotherhood — a fraternity in no way so cruelly betrayed as in its mutual upholding and guiltiness of this deadly universal vice — in spite, too, of single in- stances of the noblest individual heroism and self-abnega- tion, of decades here and there in which national life and character have shone with extraordinaiy lustre of inspira- tion for all succeeding time — still we find that the habit of alcoholic intoxication which the race formed in its child- hood has been suffered to grow with its growth, and so poisons us in our maturity that we do not, as a race, yet comprehend what happiness is, but still continue to mistake the temporary exaltations of alcohol, and other sense- excitants, for real glimpses of that highest scope and regnancy of being from which it shuts us out and down. Reasoning from the past, we may feel sure that the instinct of progress, the laws of development, of evolution, which are coeval with man, must be his essential nature so long as he exists. The eager desire to be happy, the eager search for happiness, will go on. And we may comfort ourselves at the outset with the certainty that this desire, this search, this resistless out- reaching impulse of man must in itself be good, for it ia part of man as God made him. By it God is perpetually calling to man, " Seek Me, find Me, and in Me find eternal life, eternal joy ! " But what concerns us instantly and mightily is to find out what to seek, and how to seek it. A little child stands alone at night in a great forest. Both mis- He gropes for light, even though not quite understanding ■tgnisfatuut what light is or what it can do for bim. A bright star, ^""^ ^^^ ^'^■^- 288 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. First gropings toward knowledge by means of the senses. Alcohol believed to be a great twinkling in tlie sky just over Lis father's roof, sends a long Avhite raj — straight as truth is straight — by Avhich the little one, if he only sees it, can go directly to his father's door. Bnt at the same ruoment a glow-worm, flitting and flashing before him, seems to his unlearned eye a nearer and brighter light, and he stumbles after it through bog and mire. At moments he clasps it in delight, but again and again it eludes, it escapes, or, being clutched, flares up and fades out ; Avhile the deladed child, bruised and cold, goes ever farther and farther from home. He was right to search for light — the tiny immortal spark within him made such search natural and certain. But he lacked wisdom to distinguish between the phantom- flame of the will-o'-the-wisp and the pure perennial ray of the star; and when the alternations of feverish triumph and bitter disappointment had taught him his mistake, he was exhausted — he lacked strength to return — and besides, the star had grown to look very far away and dim, for the fitful glimmer he followed had weakened his eyes, and the habit of chasing it drew him on till he sank to rise no more. So with man in the earliest stages of his development. The world of sensation was the first in which he found himself. His reasoning faculties first applied themselves here, and held back his spiritual perceptions. What felt good, what felt bad ; what he wanted, what he didn't Avant ; Avhat he liked to do, and what he didn't like to do ; these things guided him. He did not analyze second, third, and fourth results. And in this stage of being his search for happiness, instead of leading him out and up in life, chained him to himself. He Avas his oaati horizon, his OAvn zenith and nadir; for self-seeking — that is, the effort to please and gratify only one's self — can only go on within the life of the senses. Pleasurable sensations, physical delights ; separated from all thought or care for the rights and delights of others ; to be gained at the expense of these, at any cost, so that they are gained ; these have been and are the self-seeker's ideal of happiness — to him the glow-worm inevitably obscures the star. •»*• And in alcohol he believed he bad found the crowning agent for producing a strange pleasure of its own, v\-hich ORIGIN AND CAUSES OF ALCOHOLISM. 289 had also power to enhance and vary kindred pleasures in- agent for dulged in with it.* P-;3_ By this undue development of the senses, the normal Natural appetites, tastes, and passions of man were transformed and passions into the various lusts of the flesh ; the lust of acquisition, changed into arraying him against his brother in bloody conquests for lusts by the power, for possessions, making him covet Na b ftth's vineyard ^g°g[™^ejjt and Naboth's wife; the lust of ease, making him deaf to of the senses, the cry of the down-trodden and impoverished, lest to listen should prove troublesome ; the lust of gold, that Shylock lust whose sordid outcry, " Qh, my ducats, my ducats ! Oh, my daughter ! " shows to what level the lust of gold can sink the sacredcst ties of love ; the lust of the eye, which turns men' and women into birds of prey, and manhood and womanhood into moral quicksands, where modesty, love, and the divine purposes of sex are in^ecoverably degraded and lo^t. ;^ut while this was going on through the ages, the ^g"t*J|^^ro"* spiritual and mental powers of man were also slowly un- gress under folding and beginning to struggle through the meshes ^^o^g.'"^" woven by the senses ; beginning also, though at first but dimly and fitfully, to assert their sway as masters in the stead of the usurping senses, and to find that these, in their headlong, egoistic, untutored search for happiness, had produced conditions wholly foreign to it. * Of course, I do not mean to imply that the senses are in them- selves coarse or degrading, or that all self-seeking is plainly and vulgarly manifested, as the foregoing might seem to imply. The senses are what they should be, when bearing their proper relation of capable and docile servants to the rounded individuality of man. But when they lead and control, they lose the invaluable qualities of the faithful servant, without gaining one quality by which they can fitly lead. f%.nd the man who abdicates to his senses, descends from the throne where God placed him, and submits his head to his own heel,| This is the condition of him whose search for happiness begins Ema ends with self ; and it is an openly low or apparently refined condition according to t^e great differences in the temperaments, personal con- ditions, ^d surroundings of men. And alcohol — more than all intoxi- cants — has great paramount power to bring about this surrender to the senses ; for, as is well known and indisputable, passions of which man is master in a sober state, alcohol will not only fire beyond his control, but reinforce with others that never awakened in sobriety, and make him do scores of shameful things of which, but for its in- fluence, he would be utterly incapable. U 290 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. The two great factions into ■which this development has divided mankind. The graspers who succeed. The graspers who fail. Alcohol a powerful agent in restricting man to the life of the eeuBCs. Egoism and sensuality had put the world " out of joint," had dismembered it, as it were, into two great factions — the graspers who succeed, and the graspers who fail. The first are the few, but the all-powerful in having secured more than the lion's share of this world's treasures and possessions, and the power to continue to gain and hold these ; in having absorbed to their own service the results of the general total of physical and mental labour ; and who have, by the processes thus resulting, as well as by the result itself, so removed themselves from the other faction that, though they know it exists, they do not under- stand the elements of which it is composed ; are cold to its necessities, deaf to its claims, stone-blind to their own responsibilities toward it, and therefore fatally indifferent to, fatally ignorant of, the tragedy to which it tends. The other faction — the graspers who do not succeed, who, in the same self-seeking struggle for an ignis-fatuus happiness, have been driven to the wall — they are innumer- able, and they ignorantly hate and envy those whom they fancy have attained the object of the unequal conflict, not seeing that victory which consists in satisfaction of self and the senses is really a worse defeat than their own, so far as true happiness is concerned ; for it is of the rich man that it is written, he shall not easily enter the kingdom of heaven, while the poor man is assured he shall, if he only will, find that kingdom within him. Tet perhaps these — the poor, the depressed — see a little further into the portent of this unnatural struggle ; they have so little to hoard, so little treasure to guard, that they hoard their own sense of wrong — not always seeing where blame is due — and count over the coin of disappointment which gluts the mints of resentment and despair. In this tension, neither the rich nor the poor are happy, neither are blameless. Both feel the undying yearning which selfishness has done its utmost to destroy ; life, exhausted in the intermittent, swiftly cloying pleasures of the senses, beats wearily upon worn-out strings that scarcely can any longer vibrate. And one means all- powerful in producing and pi-otracting this delusion, a means which more than any other has misled man's search, and has done more than any other to place and keep him in the world of the senses, in spite of spiritual ORIGIN AND CAUSES OF ALCOHOLISM, 291 and mental progress, a means within the reach of all, clamoured for by all, and to be had in abundance by poor as well as rich, is alcohol. In his profound work. The Arts of Intoxication (London, Dr. Crane on 1877), the Rev. Dr. Crane says— moticluL " He that gave our nature its depths did not design that those depths should be stirred by trifles. He gave them, not for luxury, but for utility in the great aim and work of life. He never intended that the deepest, richest tones of our nature should be evoked by every careless touch of the keys. Human wants, human affections, the demands which belong to time, and the infinite motives which come to us from the eternal world are all designed to touch each, its appropriate spring. The exalted enjoy- ments of devotion should be richer, sweeter to our souls a thousandfold than all worldly success or worldly pleasure. And every right affection, every rational hope and desire, is meant to be a motive power, and, according to its value, to stir the heart and breathe into the soul inspirations which lend light to the eyes, make the cheek glow, send the blood bounding along its channels. . . . Man has made a fearful True ex- discovery, not how to produce, but how to imitate these ^it^^tion true exaltations. He has learned how to counterfeit the by the golden coin with which God pays the worthy labourer. excUement It has been discovered that certain poisonous drugs, of alcohol, differing in the kind and degree of their effects, are potent to lay a spell upon soul and body ; and, while every mental faculty is unhinged, and every physical power is benumbed, and the whole being rendered helpless and degraded, the abused body may lie steeped in sensuous enjoyment, and the abused mind be cheated with a seeming consciousness of unwonted activity and augmented force and brilliancy. And men have learned to covet the fleeting unnatural pleasures. For the sake of an hour of such fevered di-eams man is willing to face the horroi'S of a return to realities which his guilty pleasures have despoiled of honour, peace, and virtue ; is ready to pay the price of days of lassitude and gloom, and even of pain, remorse, and death." Self-deception, then, has made man miss happiness — Man's seif- the happiness of the perfectly harmonious individual hls'JLaae being and of the perfectly harmonized community of beings iii"' luiss into which it was intended he should develop, and, by auiound! 292 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. In religion. An illustra- tion of this. circumscribing' him to the partial world of the senses, has made him miss the truth at every turn, in religion no less than in science. In religion it has made him manufacture a God and a scheme of salvation by which he escapes all responsibility for his own being and doing. In science it has made him insist that the senses bound the entire world of scientific research and possibility ; that what cannot be demonstrated by or to the senses has no existence ; while, by the abnormal disproportionate development of the senses, the clue they might afford in a state of perfect balance with the other powers is lost. For example, let us imagine that a man has grown up without physical action ; that he has for years been sitting in an artificial frame, which has locked all his muscles in perfect stillness, with the exception of his ankles and feet ; that these have done all the motion, all the living, for the whole system, even to his ha\dng been fed through them by the process of cutaneous absorption ; that, in this way, though having originally all the component parts of feet, they have lost all resemblance to feet as we see them in the healthy human frame ; are distorted, unsightly, monstrous, incapable of bearing him up, their very size being part of their weakness for all the natural purposes of feet. The head of this man is but a little knob, his frame puny and shrunken, he lacks all that ranks him with normal man, he lives only in his feet. If he were to be muSled and covered, so that all of him but his feet were entirely hidden, and a physiologist should then be called in to say, without help of any explanation, what the two objects were and to what manner of creature they belonged, he would be quite excusable if he did not know them as feet, or if, guessing so far correctly, he constructed anything but a man for the rest of the creature ! Change the picture and transfer the developmental excess to any other member, or organ, or set of functions ; the result must always be equally false to nature and truth, because equally out of balance with them. The fault is not with the parts or powers excessively developed, nor with those lying arbitrarily dormant ; it lies in the false method, the spurious process producing these. ORIGIN AND CAUSES OF ALCOHOLISM. 203 Just as the framed man's feet lost all the fine inter- ■v\?T]at happi- flowing curves, the subtle, complex elasticities which lend ^^^s is, and themselves to the miracle of walking, so the spirit and the can be found. mind of man, chained down to the special development of the senses — which should only know themselves through his controlling and aspiring consciousness of their real purposes — have been excluded from the realization of the exquisite happiness w'hich God Himself cannot bestow until His child can conceive it ; and of which man only first conceives when first he seeks the happiness of his kind, and learns that by this path only comes happiness to meet himself ; and, in learning this, learns also not to seek it for its own sake, even though by the right way of first securing it to others, but to seek it for the sake of that blessing to others, by which it comes. How is this proven ? Because when we seek happiness in this way we have it, serene, uncloying, rich, satisfying, constant, and this though we have nothing else that men call pleasant and good ; while, on' the other hand, in the height of physical, sensuous self-gratification, we are always conscious of the gnawing of for ever unsatisfied desire at the core of life, of vague yet deep disappointment and emptiness, and thus the goad of endless craving follows the ever-artificial supply. And hence, with all our apparent advancement, we are to this day still writhing in fratricidal strife at the feet of insatiable false gods, and as man sought alcohol first for pleasiu'e, thinking it happiness, so now we, wiser, but, alas ! not stronger, drink to forget, and if we can to dream, instead of to know ; for di'ink has proven like the iron frame which has suffered only the feet to grow. § 70. The first cause of the hold alcohol has obtained Snppie- upon man being that, in mistaking the gratification of the ^ug^^ex- senses for the happiness he was born to seek and realize, plaining the he mistook alcohol for its great agent ; the next, or akohoi has supplementary causes — constituting very formidable rein- "btaintd forcements — may be classed as follows : — (a) the physical, kind. (6) the psychical ; the first relating to food and various luxurious indulgences, notably, the use of tobacco. It is a generally recognized fact that what is called "high living," the use of highly spiced dishes, and the whole 294 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. The force of example because of the sym- pathetic unity of the race. Plutarch on the lorce of association. range of epicurean habits provoke a desire for alcoholic liquors. This is largely due to the vitiation of taste and appetite, which sensuality in any of its forms must inevitably produce, and unnatural feeding not only vitiates the taste, but by imposing too much labour on the stomach prompts it to call for irritant ; and tobacco, although it acts to a certain extent as a counterpoison to alcohol, creates by its vitiation of both taste and smell, a demand for stronger tasting and stronger smelling foods, and these, again, because of their indigestible character, call for an excitation of more than the natural supply of the gastric fluids ; and thus it is seen that in the physical, as in the mental sphere of life, one wrong begets another, and all are linked in various circles that, like the lessening walls of the '■''Iron Shroud" press closer and closer until the victim is crushed. The psychical causes may be divided into — (1) The force of example, because of the sympathetic unity of the race ; (2) the force of habit, because of natural laws ; (3) the force of hereditary habit ; (4) the force of habit become instinct ; (5) the force of habit-formed instinct become nature in a depraved sense. The fact that humanity has a common basis of under- standing- — if only that of signs — indicates a common bond stretching along the whole line of human con- sciousness. The reality of this bond is manifested in the tremendous power which example, habit, and custom have over us, and God's purpose in this bond is seen in the impossibility it creates, for man's happily and pros- perously ignoring — either as individual, community, or nation — the divine command to love our neighbour as ourself. The force of example is tersely expressed in Plutarch's words : " If you associate with a cripple you will soon learn to limp yourself," and in the popular proverb, " One is known by the company he keeps." That this teaching can be abused ; that it can be cunningly turned into a defence for the grossest selfish- ness ; can be made to bear false witness against Plutarch as one who would have unfortunates and victims generally abandoned to their fate ; can be made to serve as justification for never approaching the fallen and depraved — and, in a ORIGIN AND CAUSES OF ALCOHOLISM, 295 word, to make mercy and compassion intruders among the human virtues — does not affect its true force of warning against the kind of association and sympathy which de- presses and weakens the sympathizer without cheering or benefiting the sufferer, while it does help to further pro- nounce the fact that sympathy, whether conscious or un- conscious, sensible or sentimental, unselfish or self-seeking, does powerfully, variously, and constantly affect our development. AH progress hangs upon it, because only by this bond do we have to do with one another. Were we separate — that is, insulated entities — we could not co-operate, we could not learn or profit from each other's mistakes or successes, we should not really be living in any sense in which as sympathetic beings we conceive of life. Thomas Tryon, in his work On the Method of Educating Children (London, 1695), says of the force of example, " The Fear of God, Temperance, Cleanliness, and Frugality, are taught by precept and example, even as Arts and Sciences are. ... If the Children see no disorderly nor intemperate Examples, but have the Representation and Character of the contrary Virtues continually placed before their Eyes, they will undoubtedly conform themselves to that Image." In his Commentaries on Tobacco (Sydney, 1853), T. T. Campbell Campbell says, " The habitual intercourse of persons, flue'nce'and the communion of sentiments, unanimity of opinion, and effects of the silent undervvorkiug force of imitation conspire to teVcourse ia engender a sameness of ideas, a similitude of character "^^''y '*• among members of the same group, and these, extending fi^om groups to communities, cemented by the ties of common privileges, unity of interests, and a common attachment to place of birth, probably form the ground- work of all patriotism. "Imitation is an essentially active energy in the con- The force of stitution of man, and one of the elements of habit. In of naturri*^*^ youth especially we copy something of every human action laws. or manner presented to our observation. It is in constant operation in every stage of life, and is so potent that persons living long together will insensibly acquire a mutual resemblance in some points, so that it may be said all society is a school of design, and every individual is a effects. 296 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. model for good or for evil to every other individual. Each takes his copy, too, with all the secrecy of profound uncon- sciousness, which enables the imitative faculty in man to operate on the mind with an energy so much the more sure and effective, engraining the lights and shades in the pattern of the moral copyright with almost indelible fixedness of colouring." Conscious And besides the power of example which thus pro- ^know-'^ foundly affects without our being directly aware of it, there ledged is its Openly acknowledged force. " Why should I not drink ? " says the clergyman ; * " the canon, the vicar, the bishop, di'ink. What they do, surely I may." "And as for me," says the common soldier, " I don't pretend to be better or wiser than our general, colonel, captain ; they all take their glass like gentlemen, why not I ? " " The master has his wines," says the working man, "why * The Daily Telegraph (April 24, 1883) thus pertinently com- ments on the cases of Captain Kobinson and the clergyman's son Beaumont : — " John Joseph Beaumont's story is sad. Already, at twenty-six years, he is said, by his drunken habits, to have ruined his father, a clergyman of the Establishment, and forced him to resign a com- fortable living. Appointed to a small office in the Inland Revenue, Beaumont was turned away because of his habitual insobriety ; and now he passes his time between delirium tremens out of doors and convalescence in St. Pancras Workhouse. The law of to-day, unlike that of the past, does not recognize destitution, from whatever cause, as a punishable offence, and he is now at liberty to go on ruining his relations— provided that field be not already closed to his enterprise — contracting delirium ti-emens, and knocking for admission at the workhouse door, until, failing reformation, death cuts short his disgraceful career. Wliy men like Captain Robertson and Mr. Beaumont help to swell the score of life's failures is a mystery beyond solution (?). Both are apparently well-bred; both are more than ordinarily well-educated. They had chances given them. The ball was at their feet. Poets and publicists point to the examples of what are called self-made men as being wonderful. We hear of lads born in thatched cottages, and brought up at the plough's tail, yet pressing through to the front, seizing upon the prizes of life, and becoming wealthy in the mart, or reiiowued at the bar, in the senate, and the councils of the State. In point of fact, such thrice-ennobled representatives of the Peerage of tJenius are natural products of civilized society. We are to watch for their advent and greet them with applause. Yet not they, hut the weeds and wasters, the broken captains and drunken pauper scholars, are the more truly remarkable phenomena of an age like ours." ORIGIN AND CAUSES OF ALCOHOLISM. 297 shouldn't we have a glass of beer too ? " " Don't preach to me," says the young man; "my father takes wine at dinner always, so did my professors at college. I don't care to be better than they." In the Sivord and Trowel (London, April, 1884), Mr. Spurgeon says — " Children are taught to drink, encouraged to drink, and praised for drinking ; the glass is even made a reward for good conduct. It will be little wonder if they grow up to equal and surpass their seniors, when precept and example are pointed by contemptuous jests aimed at abstainers. We have heard Christian people declare that if their children acquired a taste for strong drink it should be in after life, but they would not bear the responsibility of training them in it ; and we have thought this to be true common sense. But what is that spii'it which leads a professed believer in Christ to put the bottle to his neighbour's mouth, nay, to his child's mouth ? What is that spirit which has induced some to trample upon the scruples of the little one, and exclaim in angei-, ' I will have none of such nonsense. Are you going to teach your parents, and set up to be better than they ? ' Thousands of boys are the victims of Bacchus, for their fathers train them to take their share of beer ; this is mostly among the working classes ; but are there not too many in all ranks of society who in other shapes offer their children upon the altar of the fiery fiend ? Let the careful parent think this matter over before he further countenances wine at juvenile parties, or at holiday festivals. It may seem a trifle, . . . but when the son becomes a sot, it will afford his father no pleasure to remember that he told him to ' stick to his beer,' or taught him how to know a glass of fine old port." And thus both hereditary and acquired desires and habits are propped by the example of those whom we love and respect. And this propping is not materially weakened by the knowledge that bishops, generals,* gentlemen, and the sons of gentlemen have sometimes degenerated to the * "For fifty years I have been in Her Majesty's service, and I do not hesitate to say that some of the brightest ornaments of the service have gone down and been degraded by drink." — Vice-Admiral Sir William King Hall, Speech, London, May, 1879. 298 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. We never see our own personal danger. Dr. Chan- ning would have the wealthy classes set the example of abstinence. The force of hereditary habit. ranks of tabitual drunkards, because the inciting power of example (one of the most awful of our personal respon- sibilities to one another) — that which influences us in the way we want to go — is always more potent than its restrain- ing force, which is likely to require some sacrifice of us ! And it is certain that young people are in this matter peculiarly victims to the force of example, because in youth the imitative faculty is most susceptible, and they follow example blindly from their childlike confidence in those who set it ; not as, later, to find protection and support in practices which they have learned are, at best, questionable. Then, too, in his own individual case man always sees real drunkenness, degradation, delirium tremens — just as he sees violent accident or death — as things possible, but dim, far off, not coming to him, though happening all round to others ! " What is the example the more prosperous classes set to the poorer ? " says the Rev. Dr. William Ellery Channing. " Not that of self-denial, spirituality, of the great Christian truth that human happiness lies in the triumph of the mind over the body, in inward force and life. " The great inquiry which the poor man hears among those whose condition makes them his superiors, is — ' what shall we eat and drink, and wherewithal shall we be clothed ? ' Unceasing struggles for outward, earthly, sensual good constitute the chief activity he sees around him. To suppose that the poorer classes should receive lessons in luxury and indulgence from the more prosperous, and should yet resist the temptations to excess, is to expect fi"om them a moral force in which we feel ourselves to be sadly wanting." * § 71. We know that by repeating an act or thought until it has become spontaneous and as unconscious and involuntary as our breathing, we have formed such thought and action into habit, and habit is a part of human development in which more watchfulness is needed than in any other. Habit is formed so easily — the force of example, every- where, directly and indirectly influencing it — and forms by * Evil of Intemperance (Boston, 1837). ORIGIN AND CAUSES OF ALCOHOLISM. 299 gradations that glide upon one another so imperceptibly, that we are not only in its toils before we know it, but often without knowing it at all, and it is not only the strongest chain we forge around our own activity and influences, but among the most binding tendencies we transmit to our children. And when to its force by inheritance is added the powerful weight of sympathetic association — for our habits gravitate us to those of like habits — it is little wonder that the growing generation copies the faults and follies of the passing one, even when benefiting by some of its experience and research. For, as we have seen, the race development has, after all, thus far been so predominantly that of the senses, that great as have been its strides in purely intellectual and speculative fields, the growing, like the passing generation, and even in an intensified degree, is still chiefly bound up in investigations and experiments whose end is pleasurable — the gratification of self and the senses — in eveiy imaginable form. It seems a question whether the great mental advance- ment of the race has not been in directions and of a nature to prevent moral impulse, or at least check the best work of reflection ; whether we have not had moral analysis satisfied with its analytic power, rather than moral purpose profiting seriously by moral analysis ; so that intellectual progress and abnormal development of the senses have helplessly followed parallel lines, waiting for the moral and spiritual powers of man to bend them together and initiate a new habit of being in which all man's powers should grow into their normal relativ^e proportions. Concerning the force of evil habit, the great Danish Soren Kirke- thinker Soren Kirkegaard {Kjaerlighedens Gerninger, or |)^ee'^o''/evu^ The Works of Love, Copenhagen, 1847) says — habits. " Of all our enemies habit is perhaps the slyest, and above everything is she sly enough never to let herself be seen, for he who saw her would be saved fi'om her. Against the visible enemy we fight in self-defence ; but habit is like the soft, yet ferocious vampire that steals on the sleeper, and, while sucking his blood, coolingly moves its noiseless wings that his sleep may be the deeper. But the vampire finds its prey among the sleeping, it lacks power to lull the wakeful, while habit can creep sleep- 300 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. The force of habit become instinct. DifBculty for the race as for the in- dividual to break the chains of habit. Difficulty of adjusting our social rela- tions in givingly over those wlio are awake, and do its vampire work in slumber of its own producing." And when habit has thus stolen upon us, it transforms the whole being so as to harmonize it with the habit or habits formed. The force of example and inherited tendencies make individual habits into national character- istics, and thus countries are ruled by the habitudes of preceding epochs, by routine government, by national pre- judices, as well as hj national ignorance and blindness to the most crying vices. Just as the individual finds it difficult to change any objectionable habit, because it has become so natural that he does it before he thinks, or even without thinking, so must it also be difficult for the nation and the race to change national customs and habits im- bedded by the lapse of centuries ; or even to take full note of their power and tendency. For example, the crime of murder, except among Thugs, Assassins, the Vehmgericht, or during frenzied religious or political upheavals, is generally abhorred and con- demned, and punished by the death penalty. But the institutions, habits, and customs which are responsible for nine-tenths of the murders, are neither generally condemned nor abrogated ; but are eagerly de- fended and approved by most of those who wish to do — and think they are doing — their parts as patriots and citizens of a free country, in opposing interference with the time-honoured rights and privileges of the Hquor trade. They know that liquor does an incredible amount of wrong to the individual and to the nation. But habit — the habit of inactivity in the matter, and the habit of long participation in those social customs and commercial interests which help to sustain the liquor trade — these hold them off, and they intrench themselves in their non- interference by all sorts of specious reasoning. So great, indeed, is the power of ingrained habit, that although evil, and passively recognized as such, it is strong enough to transform the whole state and social organization into accordance with it. The tremendous power of custom and habit is almost daily felt by those interested in temperance reform, in the difficulty of deciding what is the right and wisest course ORIGIN AND CAUSES OF ALCOHOLISM. 301 to pursue in social relations. We know that alcohol is harmony poison ; in offering it to a guest we oiier him not only pergonal what is certainly non-beneiicial, but what is, in some more coEvicUons. or less degree, positively deleterious — even were the con- sideration solely that of physical health. But, in addition to this, we know that we may be starting him on the road to perdition ; for conscience, self-control, moral dignity and purpose are not equally dispensed in the moral constitutions of men, and the exterior, with all its subtle indications, by no means surely informs of the weakness or strength of a given in- dividuality. Yet the circumstances we are placed in by the drinking customs of the country make it almost impossible for us to act with our highest convictions, or even to feel sure whether it would be best to do so at the present stage of affairs. It is not well that temperance, or any cause bear- ing the banner of reform, should be characterized by narrowDcss, bigotry, iconoclastic prejudices, and vain- glorious self-assertion and intolerance. Yet social drink customs, associated as they are among the upper classes with lavish hospitality and the most pleasing graces and refinements of hfe, have often the effect of forcing the appearance of this invidious contrast upon the temperance movement ; and the whole force of habit weighs as yet on the side of the drink customs. These originated at the top of the ladder with the The great royal prerogative and the Court, from the days when great wmyTesting drinking capacity was thougfht to be one measure of fitness ^i*"^ ^^? o tiiroiis ill for occupancy of the throne; and came thence gradually this respect. down through the various grades of society into universal practice. If the Court, recognizing its responsibility for this evil, would take the lead and set the example in reform, the most formidable of the hindrances to reform — the dx'ink customs — could and would be easily overcome. Another and most important instance of the strength of rooted, ingrained habit was furnished last year (1883) at the Canterbury Convocations, when the question of using intoxicating wine at the Lord's Supper came up for verdict before the ecclesiastical tribunal. After due con- sideration, the prelates of the Church of England found 302 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. it most " convenient that the clerjgfy should conform to ancient and nnbroken nsage." Placed in the gravest dilemma they evidently felt it might be wiser not to countenance an innovation, lest, for complicated reasons, the harm ensuing should be greater than the good. It is scarcely possible to suppose that the majority among them do not believe that alcohol — now known to be a poison — is out of place at the Lord's Supper, yet, such are the difficulties accumulating through the force of habit and precedent around such a question, the verdict given is by no means incompatible with such a conviction.* If the drink evil was not in our very midst, if, like the slave trade for example, it was flourishing in far distant lands, what would England think of its results, and her responsibilities concerning them, then ? The foreigner who first sojourns in England, in London, Liverpool, or Glasgow, shudders at the scenes in the streets of these cities. After remaining a year or two, he becomes accustomed to them, and in a measnre callous, though never ceasing to feel shocked at the effect that has been produced upon the children — the well-born, well-bred boys and girls — who only on their way to school have seen and heard enough before they are twelve years old to make them familiar with and indifferent to spectacles of drunken- ness and sensuality in some of their lowest forms. Habit long pursued and transmitted becomes instinct, and at last, in a depraved sense, natural. Mr. John Mr. John Sebright, in his Observations ti-pon Instinct ^^p^^^°^ (London, 1836), expresses an opinion that "the greater part of the propensities that are generally supposed to be instinctive are not implanted in animals by nature, but are the result of long experience, acquired and accumulated through many generations, so as in the course of time to assume the character of instinct." Mr. Herbert In a letter to the Athenoeum (London, April 5, 1884), thesame*"^ Mr. Herbert Spencer quotes from his Principles of Psychology (edition of 1855) : " On the one hand. Instinct may be regarded as a kind of organized memory; on the other hand. Memory may be regarded as a kind of incipient instinct. Memory, then, pertains to all that class of psychical states which are in process of being organized. * See chapter xiii. f^ OKIGIN AND CAUSES OF ALCOHOLISM. 308 It continues so long as the organizing of them continues ; and disappears when the organization of them is complete. In the advance of the correspondence, each more complex class of phenomena which the organism acquires the power of recognizing, is responded to at first irregularly and un- certainly ; and there is then a weak remembrance of the relations. By multiplication of experiences, this remem- brance becomes stronger, and the response more certain. By further multiplication of experiences, the internal relations are at last automatically organized in corre- spondence with the external ones ; and so conscious memory passes into unconscious or organic memory." Mr. Shirley Hibberd, in an article, What is Instinct ? Mr. Shirley (Intellectual Observer, London, July, 1863), says that J^l^game?'' instinct is "the work of the mind rendered literally uniform by habit . . . but no matter how strong the force of habit, if initially it is the result of an act of reasoning and the expression of a motive, and is followed for a purpose, then it can never be separated from mind, though when the habit is fixed it makes little or no demand upon the mind until some exigency arises demand- ins: a deviation from habitual rule." o ^ . ... In his essay on Instinct (E ncyclopcedia Britanmca, new ed. vol. xiii.), Prof. J. J. Romanes says — "By the effects of habit in successive generations. The force of mental activities which were originally intelligent, become j^ng^/hict™!'^ as if they were stereotyped into permanent instinct. coming " Just as in the lifetime of the individual, adaptive depraved * actions which were originally intelligent, may, by frequent sense. repetitions, become automatic ; so in the lifetime of the species, actions originally intelligent may, by frequent repetition and heredity, so write their effects on the nervous system that the latter is prepared, even before individual experience, to perform adaptive actions mechani- cally, which in previous generations w^ere performed intelligently — called ' lapsing of intelligence.' We find good evidence that new or chang'ed experience, when con- tinued over a number of generations, is bequeathed to future generations as a legacy of intuitive knowledge." These definitions and analyses of habit and instinct point to two of the most solemn and important facts of human evolution : that of the present impossibility of 304 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. History waiting to say some- thing new. conscientiously accepting the leading of our instincts, except after uncompromising scrutiny ; and that of the paramount obligation to try ourselves and our instincts by tests of self-renunciation, combined with unflinching, con- stant, and large consideration for others ; for we know ourselves to have gone so far on the wrong way that we cannot decide what is natural or true merely by the guidance of feelings and instincts which are in themselves so much the product of our wrong-going. And therefore, even w^hen a man says of alcohol that he " knows it is good for him," that "it agrees with him," his assertions, if sincei-e — and such assertions often are — only prove how thoroughly vitiated his system and its demands have become. The current saying that " History repeats itself " is a puerile complaint and a querulous pretence. It is the favourite epig-ram of our effete spirits, ever making the same weary round within a circle of our own drawing, till there is little power for searching or soaring beyond. While we persist as a race in a life of selfishness and sensual indulgence, no intellectual advance alone can set ns free, or release History from her painful task of noting our gyrations fi^om and to the same old points of departure. If a child will not learn its lesson, the teacher cannot advance it to the next room. The teacher can only explain over and over again. If the child is content to be ignorant, or unwilling to take the trouble of learning, we are not surprised when he complains — " I'm tired of hearing that old lesson over and over. I can't learn it ; I won't learn it; thei-e'U be more just like it if I do ! I don't believe there is any next room ! " History repeats itself only so long as we make it necessary to the learning of our lesson. She will say something new, something grander than all that has gone before, as soon as we will let her. CHAPTER XII. SPECIOUS REASONINGS CONCERNING THE USE OF ALCOHOL. " Temperance is the unyielding control of reason over lust, and over all wrong tendencies of the mind. Temperance means not only frugality, but also modesty and self-government. It means abstinence from all things not good and entirely innocent in their character." * — Cicero. § 72. Just as alcoliol, by its imperceptible action in filtrating Similarity of poison throughout generation after generation of the body, body^Vison- has poisoned the race, so the arguments in favour of its i"e ^^'^ use, in filtrating their poison through the public mind poisoning. from generation to generation, have shackled the reason, judgment, and conscience, which would have succumbed to no open and sudden onset, however formidable. As falsehood is dangerous in the degree that it is mixed with truth, so specious reasoning regarding drink is the of half "^'''^ more dangerous in the degree that its warp is crossed with truths. threads of religious, social, moral, and political truths. Specious reasoning, always plausible and usually clever, never strains popular comprehension or interpre- tation, and seldom exacts profound thought. It wears a mask of truth, under which it moves its features so in- geniously that we scarcely suspect the mask. It appeals to selfishness, calling it good nature ; it incites false honour, calling it consideration and tact ; it flatters false liberty, calling it individuality and self-respect. f * For a voluminous and excellent compendium of authorities on the true meaning of the word temperance, see The Morals of Temper- ance, chap, i., in Dr. F. R. Lees' Temperance Text-Booh (vol. i. London, 1884). t " Invocation : Let us invoke all the powers on earth and under X 306 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. The two con- There are two conditions in which a man will admit whkh^ili'ln ^'^^ ^° ^^ ^"^^^ • fii'st, before he has ever committed or will admit expectsd to commit it ; last, when he has steeped himself evu.^" IS ^^ -J. ^^ deeply, that there is neither shame nor hope enough left to tempt him to lie about it. On the down grade you will not get the truth from him, he will not tell it even to himself. So the man who does not drink, and the sot, will alike tell you that drinking is a degTadation and a curse, but the moderate drinker, of all grades of moderation, defends the habit tenaciously ; at one point, or at another, wherever you attack, you find him there, and in whatever shape best opposes or neutralizes your attack. Hyper-sensi- The ingenious reasonings and arguments which have viTuahtya been woven around the habit of drink by those who love great obstacle it, and who wish the justification of plenty of company in ofpersomu i^> ^^^ very difficult to deal with. They are so much a reform. matter of personal opinion, of mutual influence, of the rooted love of pleasure curiously mixed with the desire to the earth for the whole state of the British Distillery. And let us implore the aid and assistance of those Immortal Shades who dared to rival the Lord of Heaven, and are invested with the Power of the Air, by which they po to and fro upon the Earth to deceive and seduce Mankind : That there may never be wanting arguments to delude, nor bribes to corrupt." — An Oration delivered before an Aiidience of Distillers, by Baalzebub (London, 1760). In the Pail Mall Gazette (April 5, 1884) I find the following :— "proposal fok a mission to stakt a public-house. " The Bishop of Bedford presided on Thursday night at a meeting in the board-room of the S.P.C.K. office, at which were present the Right Hon. Sir J. R. Mowbray, M.P., Mr. J. G. Talbot, M.P., the Warden of All Souls and Keble, Canon Scott-Hilliard, and other friends of the proposed movement for Oxford men Avorking in the East End of London ; and it was proposed to place an ' Oxford House ' in the parish of St. Andrew, Bethnal Green, of which the Rev. Knight Bruce was in charge. Mr. Albert Pell, M.P., suggested the propriety of the Oxonians buying a public. house. He said that he should be happy to lease them one. He was not joking. A publican could get at as many people as a person could reach. They could take this house and insist that it should be conducted so that a man could take his vife and children into it xnthout the ears of the women being hurt, and if there was a little drunkenness, that was not the greatest crime in the world, though people often spoke as if it ivere." SPECIOUS REASONINGS OX THE USE OF ALCOHOL. 307 be considered conscientious, and with some real impulses to do right ; and tlie whole sophistical mesh is so plausible and. subtle (resulting from long inheritance of dr'ink habit, drink custom, and drink sophistry, so that the selfishness is well concealed even from the sophist himself), and so personal, that the first outwork the reformer encounters — or he who seeks help to be self-reforming— is that of hyper-sensitive individuality. Then there are the myriads of onlookers, intelligent it is not only people, who are not quick or clever reasoners, but who deceWedfbut sincerely search for, though they cannot argue about the for the truth ; people who respect themselves and abhor debauchery, searchers and who, meaning neither to deceive nor be deceived, are t^e ignorant balancing this important question of moderate drinking — win in this of drinking at all, with the intention of discovering ^tnfo.„ie whether moderate indulgence is harmless in itself, and whether it has a tendency to become immoderate. It is also for these and their heirs for ever that victory in this good struggle is to be won. And to win, it is not only necessary to unwind all specious arguments and leave the truth standing bare and clear ; it is necessary to do it in such a way that the masses w^ill see that it is done, will be convinced. If every beer-shop and public-house were closed, every brewery and distillery destroyed, every bottle broken, and every di'op of alcoholic drink spilled out of England into the ocean to-day, and no more of the same were admitted within its borders for a year and a day, England might see something of what abstinence could do, but she would not experience the effects of abstinence voluntarily imposed upon himself hy man, under the sincere conviction that in- toxicating drinks are evil. It is this that is wanted every- where, in every heart and life. Whether a little drink be hurtful or harmless, is not now, if it ever was, the question. What is wanted is the general diffusion of the knowledge The great that alcohol is a poison to body and mind; that, though general and the drinker may in his oivn person to all appearayices positive escape baneful co7isequences, his children and children s on°he^sub- children must often bear them. What is wanted is the i''^^' and conviction that no m,an can guiltlessly indulge in that recognition which, not being a necessity for himself, is, by his in- °espons^*^ dulging, a snare to his brother. That drink is such a biiity. 308 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. The fallacy of the boast that the virility of the English nation proves the comparative harmlessness of drink. Brief epitome of England's drink history. BerRcnroth on the atti- tude of the Court con- ceminp; water-drink- ing in 1498. snare, is abundantly proved by the fact that, "wherever the custom of moderate drinking has been sanctioned by the community, there has always been a large number in that community to sink from moderation to excess. § 73. In dealing with specious reasoning, we must remember that even fools can make assertions which, however groundless, a wise man will find it difficult to successfully gainsay, and thorough indeed must be the refutation of assertions made in the interests of self- indulgence. It is common in England (probably at present the hardest drinking country in the world) to hear the defenders of drink boast that the virility and might of the English nation proves the outcry against alcohol to be greatly exaggerated, if not unfounded. Many peculiar local and historic circumstances (such, for instance, as the insular position which has often com- paratively sheltered England from the commotions and anxieties of the continental Powers), combined with prudent and vigorous statesmanship, have mightily contributed to the foundation and maintenance of England's present power, but we may be certain that the comparative sobriety of the English race has done more. For however strong the hold of this vice in the present, it is a fp.ct that the English as a nation have not been hard drinkers more than about two hundred years, which can be said of no continental nation. Beers and the use of hops became known in England during the sixteenth century ; before that time, the favourite drink of the people was ale and mead, the substitute for hops being wormwood ; and at about the same time tea and coffee were beginning to come into general use, and acted modifyingly. It appears from State documents that as early as the fifteenth century, water, so far as the Court was concerned, was regarded as unfit to drink. Says Bergenrotb, in his Calendar of State Papers (No. 1156)— " The Spanish ambassador at the court of Henry VII., De Pucbla Talavera, writes to Ferdinand and Isabella (July 17th, 1498) that the English queen, and Lady SPECIOUS EEASONINGS ON THE USE OF ALCOHOL. S09 Margaret, the king's mother, wish that the young Princess Catherine of Arragon being affianced to the Prince of Wales (though still living in Spain) should accustom her- self to drink wine, since the water in England is not drinkable, and even if it were the climate would not allow the drinking of it." It was through the marriage between the English and French rojal houses that wine-drinking was first gradually spread among the masses in England, by means of the consequent favotirable tarilf to the importation of wine. Before that time the masses did not generally drink ale, and what they did drink was ordinarily of a very light character, and excessive drinking was rare. Says Camden citation (Annals, 1581)- _ ^^en-s " The English, who hitherto had of all the Northern Annais,i5si. nations shown themselves the least addicted to immoderate drinking, and been commended for their sobriety, first learned in these wars in the N^etherlands to swallow large quantities of intoxicating liquors, and destroy their own health by drinking that of others." In his curious work. The Government of Health (London, in 1595 Dr. 1595), Dr. William Bullein says, "They that drinke wyne Sf™in customably with measure, it doth profit them much and speaking of maketli good digestion ; those people that use to drink evu^'makes wyne seldom times, be distempered . . . ale and beere no mention have no such virtue and goodness as -wyne hath." He iiquor! does not mention distilled liquors. Mr. Sherlock, iu his Shakespeare on hitemperance „., ,. , /T 1 Tr)n-»\ p • ■ 1 -\ rm T-n Citationirom (London, Ibhz), quotes from a section entitled The Flague the com- 0/ our English Gentry, of the Compleat Gentleman by Henry ^'an*(i622'r Peacham (1622), the following: — " Within these fiftie or threescore yeares it was a rare thing with us to see a drunken man, our nation carrying the name of the most sober and temperate of any other in the world. But since we had to doe in the quarrell of the Netherlands, the custom of drinking and pledging healthes was brought over into England ; wherein let the Dutch be their owne judges, if we equall them not ; yea, I think rather excell them." In his well-known work. Way to Health, Long Life, From and Happiness (1683), Tryon says that formerly canary Jj^seaitK'^^ (wine) was sold almost exclusively by apothecaries. ^^0 W^^ 310 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. arid Happi- ness (1683). Hard drink- ing not com- mon in England until the 17th century. Citation from Dr. Foe's Poor Man's Plea. From Sir John Har- rington's AntiqiUB. From Bishop Benson in Lecky's History of England (1878). " Where there was one quart of wiiie drunk forty or fifty years ago (wbicli would be about 1635) there is now ten thousand . . . the use of tobacco and brandy a hundred years since was hardly known. IN^ay, the use of our ale and beer has hardly been above two hundred years." Which shows that hard drinking did not become common until the latter part of the seventeenth century. Concerning the condition brought about by the Act for Encouragement of Distillation, De Foe, in his Poor Mans Plea, says — " Drunkenness had become a science, and but that instruction in it proved so easy, and the youth too apt to learn, possibly we might have had a college erected for it before now." And of the evil example set by the nobility, he says, " Whoever gives himself the trouble to reflect on the custom of our gentlemen in their families en- couraging and promoting this vice of drunkenness among the poor, will not think it a scandal upon the gentry of England if we say that the mode of drinking that is now practised had its origin in the practice of the country gentlemen, and they again from the courts." Then came free trade in liquors during Queen Anne's reign. Sir John Harrington, in his Nugce Antiquce, describing the Danish king Christian's visit to Queen Anne of England, says — " The ladies have abandoned their sobriety, and are seen to roll about in intoxication. ... I see no man nor woman either that can now command himself or herself." The close of the eighteenth century saw little improve- ment on this state of affairs. In Lecky's History of Eng- land (1878) there is a graphic quotation from Bishop Benson, picturing the condition of England at that time. "Not only," says the bishop, "is there no safety of living in this town (London), but scarcely any in the country now. Robbery and murder are grown so frequent. Our people are become what they never before were — cruel and inhuman. Those cursed spirituous liquors, which to the shame of our Government are so easily to be had, and are in such quantities drunk, have changed the very nature of our people." Among the nobility and clergy, drinking has been more or less prevalent for about five hundred years, but SPECIOUS REASONINGS ON THE USE OF ALCOHOL, oil the English masses have been hard drinkers for only a little over two hundred years, or about one hundred years less than any other nation, America excepted. Therefore the assertion that the strength of the English race is evidence that drink is not injurious, is seen to be fallacious. Rev. Dr. Dawson Burns, in his Christendom and the The Rev. Dr. Drink Curse (London, 1875), eloquently exposes specious Burns on the arguments of the character of evasion in these words : specious " Nothing can be more superficial, not to say sophistical, used to prove than the manner in which some literary men, who have ^f^llon of"*' no practical knowledge of the subject, endeavour to meet crime in so- the force of this argument, whether used for abstinence or countries" prohibition, by referring to countries comparatively sober Justifies the (such as Spain and some parts of the East) where crimes that drink"is of great enormity are very common. Whatever may be the not at the causes of such crimes there, they cannot prove that strong most of the drink is not at the bottom of two-thirds or three-fourths ^jftedT™' of the crimes committed in the United Kingdom ; and to Great assume, as is done, that if the British causes were removed, '■'^'°- the foreign ones would take their place, is an outrage on common sense and knowledge of the world. Assuming the facts to be as stated, they do but show what no one ever doubted — that the causes of crime differ in different countries ; the reasonable inference being, that eveiy country should seek to remove those causes of crime that are special to itself. Brigandage is rampant in some countries, and has its peculiar causes ; but what would be said by English writers if suitable means for the removal of those causes were opposed on the ground that drinking is the principal cause of crime in Great Britain ? Equally ridiculous is the plea that because some sober countries are subject to crime from peculiar causes, therefore British crime is not owing to strong drink, or that the sum of it would remain as before, if drinking were abolished, all evidence and internal probability to the contraiy notwith- standing. It may at the same time be doubted whether the countries credited with this remarkable sobriety deserve the praise, or at least whether the crimes committed there are not largely due to the use of intoxicants by the criminal part of the population. It was so dui'ing the 312 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Indian Mutiny, when tlie sepoys, guilty of the worst atrocities, were made mad with bhang and arrack. It was so during the Communist rule in Paris, and the later outrages of the Spanish revolutionists. And in Eastern countries crime will be chiefly found to prevail among the classes that do not comply with the rules of sobriety, while those classes of the population free from drinking are strikingly free from other offences. So it is in Turkey, and so in India. It ought not to require much reasoning- capacity to perceive that the absence of intoxicating liquors must be favourable to the decrease of crime, and that whatever may be the amount of crime where they are unknown, their use would lead to an aggravation and an increase." Habitual drunkenness universally condemned. Moderate drinking the nucleus of dispute. JJo fixed standard of moderation possible. Dr. John "Cheyne. Fourteen glasses of wine per day the modera- tion limit of a German temperance society in the sixteenth century. lo our day, § 74. All sensible people think alike on one feature of the drink question : they agree in condemning habitual drunkenness and sottishness as repulsive and contemptible. But on the question of so-called " moderate " drinking there is almost as much divergence of opinion as there is latitude of interpretation. The first thing Avould be to ascertain the standard of moderation ; but no standard has yet been fixed, no definition of the term been settled upon. Nor, indeed, would it be possible to do so from the physiological stand- point ; for while a single glass may produce drunkenness in one man, another man might di^ink ten glasses and show no signs of intoxication. " They who have heard how large a quantity of fer- mented liquor may sometimes be taken without injury," says Dr. John CheyTie, in A Letter on the Effects of Wine and Spirits (Dublin, 1829), "ought also to know how small a quantity may prove injurious, otherwise the question at issue has not been fairly submitted to their judgment." In Germany, in the sixteenth century, a temperance society based its laws on the restriction of its members to ''''fourteen glasses of tvine daily." In our day observation shows that " moderation " means just as little as a man chooses to drink, and also just as much as he chooses to drink short of the point of evident intoxication, nor is the line drawn even here by all, nor is there any one vested SPECIOUS REASONINGS ON THE USE OF ALCOHOL. 313 with authority to say that the line shall be drawn any- moderation where. Ttlonai On being asked to define the term, one man says, some of the " Moderation is to drink no more than you know is good most usual for you, and never under any circumstances to exceed that the term" amount." Further questioning elicits the fact that the quantity varies ; for example, his habit is to drink two or three glasses of wine or beer at dinner daily, and a glass of brandy now and then before going to bed ; in company, he is, of course, not so strict ; it would be disloyal, bigoted, unsocial, not to drink the health of the Queen, the Royal Family, and other toasts ; but he understands himself perfectly, and knows what he can bear ; he confesses to having sometimes been a little "jolly," but nothing worse, and he has only contempt for those who cannot thus con- trol themselves. This is a fair specimen of the moderate drinker's definition of the term. Another moderate drinker cannot tell you the quantity he takes. " I take a glass whenever I feel like it," he says, " but I always stop at the right point, and I don't frequent the public-house." Another claims modei'ation on the ground that he is never exactly " dead drunk," or that he is "only drunk now and then." " We are assured," says the Lancet, in an article. Are The Lancet Puhlicans the Enemies of Drunlcemiess ? (May, 1872) "that ancfspecious they (the publicans) regard this vice with a horror in no reasoning way second to the horror of teetotalers . . . from whom, moderation. indeed, they only differ in the opinion they have formed with regard to the best means of repressing the evil. Teetotalers would diminish drunkenness by enjoining abstinence from alcohol, . . . publicans, by enjoining moderation." As to the meaning of moderation, the Lancet says, " It is simply a matter of definition. A learned judge once said that a man was not drunk so long- as he could lie on the ground without holding on ; to reel and stagger a little, to use foul language to decent people, ... to squander the earnings that should support a family, and gently punch the head of the partner of one's joys and cares ; ... to do all this when under the influence of drugged beer is not to be drunk, but only ' a little fresh.' " § 75. Physicians, who should certainly be the highest 314 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. authorities, very rarely attempt to define a fixed standard for moderation.* Thepracticai But even if a moderation standard were theoretically nessofthe found, its unattainability in practice at once becomes ap- Piea of parent. moderation. ■'^ t i , • ^ o , • t in enapter iv. some general tacts were given regarding the science of liquor adulteration and its prevalence, show- ing that, except in rare instances, all alcoholic liquors are, as a rule, adulterated. This fact alone makes the observance of any standard of moderation impossible to the majority. Bat even if alcoholic drinks were not often adulterated, the moderation standard would still to the vast majority of people remain utterly unattainable. It was shown in chapter v. that the relative harm done by alcohol directly depends on a variety of more or less difficult, personal, and other circumstances and conditions ; such as constitution, temperament, climate, antecedents, * They sometimes attempt it, however. The late Dr. Anstie, for example, gave his standard of moderation in an issue of the Prac. titioner (early in 1871), on which the Temperance Record commented as follows : — " This is the nearest approach that we have ever met to a defini- tion of the moderate use of alcohol, namely, not more than two ounces of alcohol in twenty-four hours for an adult man, and not more than three-fourths of an ounce for a woman. It would be a sad interrup- tion to the enjoyment of a convivial party if Dr. Anstie's standard of moderation were set up for its gnidance. There would be, in the first place, the necessity of learning the amount of alcohol contained in the wine or other inebriating liquor placed before the guests ; and the size of the glasses would have to be made known, so that each person might understand how many glasses he or she might take without going beyond the bounds of moderation. And then, in the second place, there would be great difiiculty in keeping to the right number of glasses. For alcohol, when taken into the stomach, so affects the nerves and brain as to make persons feel anxious for more of it. This constitutes its most dangerous property. It exhilarates, and it creates an alcoholic appetite which grows stronger by indulgence. It would be extremely difficult to keep to the standard. In fact, to propose to restrict or point out the quantity of alcoholic liquor which may be safely used, would be to acknowledge that the drink is, as the teetotalers assert, highly dangerous. It would be to make a dis- tinction between alcoholic liquors and all the other articles of food or drink that we use. The admirers of the liquors would naturally revolt at the idea of fixing a very narrow limit to the consumption of what they profess to consider the good creatures of God. We dispute the utility of attempts to set bounds to the consumption of bx"ain- SPECIOUS REASONINGS ON THE USE OF ALCOHOL. 315 occapation, condition of tlie stomach, etc., etc. It may be said tliat a skilful physician would be able to make allowance for all these things. But this very fact proves that a general standard is out of the question. And, again, supposing these objections were the only ones, and that the medical profession had really reached this necessary proficiency, even then it would be only the rich who could practise moderation ! But even were a general standard for the individual approximately reached, there are considerations which would still make its observance practically impossible. In chapter v. it was seen how the harm produced by alcohol depends on (besides the conditions jast enu- merated) the nature of the alcohols imbibed, and their relative saturation with water. Supposing, therefore, that the moderation quantum of alcohol could be fairly ascertained, it would still be im- possible to put the standard in practice, until every bottle of wine, whisky, brandy, gin, beer, ale, etc., should be scientifically tested, and the required saturation and character of the alcohol be thus ascertained or prepared. Thus it is seen that the term moderation, when applied to intoxicating liquors, has no value, because it has no reliable signification ; and that its chief use is to cover with the mantle of i*espectability as much as possible the varying grades of a habit bad from first to last, in what- ever degree it is indulged in. It is but fair in this connection to mention the fact that very many persons ranking among moderate drinkers both have and con- scientiously observe a fixed standard, and not only do not exceed its limits, but sincerely believe that within those limits the indulgence is harmless. But why, after all, should there be this search for a safe moderation dose ? If alcohol, while being the dan- gerous article we know that it is, had yet been found to poisoning drinks. Moderation may be theoretically right, but it is ever proving practically wrong. All the victims of intemperance began their use of strong drink in moderate quantities, and the drink has made them what they are. The drink is truly a mocker ; men flatter themselves that they know how to guide themselves — they can distinguish the use from the abuse ; but they learn by painful experience that the drink is strong, while men are weak." 316 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Dr. Grindrod {Bacchus, 1839) on moderate drinking as the pre- paratory stage of drunken- ness. Dr. J. Baxter on moderate drinking. Dr. Copland on the same. be under certain conditions and in certain quantities essential to life and health ; then, indeed, would it become not only proper but an imperative necessity for us to find out the right way to use it. But it is proved and admitted by every one qualified to speak about it, and who values the truth, that alcohol is not necessary to either life or health ; that, on the contrary, neither are served by its use, in any quantity. Why, then, search for a standard, of moderatiou for the use of a thing, at best quite valueless, and whose most jDrobable efi^ect is the formation of an appetite in every way dangerous to the health of body and mind ? And what is the testimony of competent authorities as to the results of moderate drinking ? In Bacchus (London, 1839), Dr. Grindrod tells us that " the habit of intoxication is a confirmed taste or appetite for strong drink, acquii-ed in the first instance by moderate indidgence. The state of intoxication is that high degree of excitement of which moderate drinking is the preparatory stage. " One of the first stages of mtemperance is witnessed in the anxiotis and tmeasy feelings which even moderate drinkers invariably experience on occasions when they have been accidentally deprii-ed of their accustomed allowance. Sen- sations of this nature present undoubted evidence of the existence and development of the inebriate propensity. Indeed, the great danger of moderate drinking consists in the inability to ascertain at what pi'ecise period in the progress of the vice this unnatural sensation first com- mences." In Testimonies of Physicians (New York, 1830), Dr. J. Baxter says, " The habit of moderate drinking has been the principal cause of the widespread scourge of intemperance. The laws of gravitation in impelling ponderous bodies toward the centre are scarcely more certain than the moderate use of liquor in begetting the drunken appetite." As to the physiological results of moderate drinking, I find the following medical opinions quoted by Dr. Grindrod (op. cit.) : — "In his Diet, of Tract. Med. (1835), Dr. Copland says, ' There can be no doubt that, as expressed by the late Dr. Gregory, an occasional excess is upon the whole less SPECIOUS REASONINGS ON THE USE OF ALCOHOL. 317 injurious to tlie constitution than the practice of daily taking a moderate quantity of any fermented liquor or spirit.^ "In his Lecture on Health (2nd edition, 1800), Dr. Dr. Garnett. Garnett said, ' Those who drink only a moderate qiiantity of wine, so as to make them cheerful, as they call it, but not absolutely to intoxicate, may imagine that it will do them no hai'm. The strong and robust may enjoy the pleasures of the bottle and the table with seeming im- punity, and sometimes for many years may not find any bad effects from them ; but, depend upon it, if a full diet of animal food be every day indulged in, with only a moderate portion of wine, its baneful influence will blast the vigour of the strongest constitution.' " Dr. James Johnson avers that — ' A very considerable Dr. James proportion of the middle and higher classes of life, as well J°^"^°"- as the lower, commit serious depredations on their con- stitutions, when they believe themselves to be sober citizens, and do really abhor debauch. This is by drinking ale and other malt liquors to a degree far short of intoxica- tion, yet from long habit producing a train of effects that embitter the later periods of existence.^ "Said Dr. Macrorie, 'After having treated more than Dr.Macrorie. three thousand cases in the town hospital, Liverpool, I give it as my decided opinion that the constant moderate use of stimulating drinks is m^ore injurious than the now and then excessive indulgence in them.' " Dr. Gordon, of Edinburgh, corroborated Dr. Macrorie, Dr. Gordon. saying that in numerous post-mortem examinations made on ' the bodies of persons who had died of various diseases in a population much more renowned for sobriety and temperance than that of London, there was the remarkable fact that in all these cases there was, more or less, some affection of the liver ; and these people had not been in any shape or form intemperate, and they were moral and religious people, who would have been shocked at the imputation ; but they had been in the habit of drinking a small quantity of spirits every day.' " Dr. Sewall says, " 1 am persuaded that tens of thousands Dr. Sewaii. of temperate drinkers die annually from diseases through which the abstemious would pass in safety." In a letter dated March 15, 1873, Sir Henry Thompson siriienry wrote to the late Archbishop of Canterbury (Dr. Archibald '^'i^ompson. 818 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Sir William Gull. Dr. B. W. Carpenter. Campbell Tait), "I have no hesitation in attributing a very lai'ge proportion of some of the most painful and dangerous maladies which come under my notice, as well as those which every medical man has to treat, to the ordinary and daily use of fermented drink, taken in the quantity which is conversationally deemed moderate." And Sir William Gull stated to the Lords' Select Com- mittee of Inquiry into the Prevalence of Intemperance (1877), that " all alcohol, and all things of an alcoholic nature, injure the nerve-tissues pro tempore, if not alto- gether, and are certainly deleterious to the health. I think there is a great deal of injury being done by the use of alcohol in what is supposed by the consumer to be a most moderate quantity, to people who are not in the least intemperate, to people supposed to be fairly well. It leads to degeneration of tissues. It spoils the health and it spoils the intellect. Short of drunkenness (that is, in those effects of it which stop short of drunkenness), I should say, from my experience, that alcohol is the most destructive agent we are aware of in this country." Although it is not easy, and perhaps not possible, to demonstrate the nature and exact amount of harm resulting to any particular individual from the occasional or even the regular use of alcohol in very minute quantities, scientific observation tends^ — as we have seen — to prove that it always is, and acts as, a poison, whether in sickness or health. Dr. B. W. Carpenter, in his Temperance and Abstinence (London, 1881), gives a very valuable analysis of both the difficulty of tracing the direct results of extreme modera- tion and of penetrating the web of specious reasoning which is woven around it. He says, " ' The little I take does me no harm,' is the common defence of those who are indisposed to abandon an agreeable habit, and who cannot plead a positive benefit derived from it ; but before such a statement can be justified, the individual who makes it ought to be endowed with the gift of prophecy, and to be able to have present to his mind the whole future history of his bodily fabric, and to show that, by reducing the amount of his excess to a measure which produces no immediately injurious results, he has not merely postponed its evil consequences to a remote period, SPECIOUS REASONINGS ON THE USE OF ALCOHOL. 319 but has kept himself free from them altogether. The onus prohandi lies with those who assume the absence of a con- nection, which is indicated by every fact with which we are acquainted. ... If the medical man has no hesitation in regarding those severer derangements of the digestive and excretory organs, which are so common amongst those who commit habitual excesses in eating and drinking, as the consequence of those excesses, why should he refrain from attributing the milder but more protracted disorders of the same organs to the less violent but more enduring operation of the same cause ? " Let it be remembered that we have multitudes of cases, in which the long-continued agency of morbific causes, of comparatively low intensity, has been proved to be not less potent in the end than the administration of a poison in a dose large enough to produce its obviously and immediately injurious effects. Thus, a man Avho would be rapidly suffocated by immersion in an atmo- sphere of carbonic acid, may live for weeks, months, or years in an atmosphere slightly contaminated by it, with- out experiencing any evil effects which he can distinctly connect with its influence, and yet who will now deny that the constant action of this minute dose of aerial poison is insidiously undermining his vital powers, and preparing him to become the easy prey of any destructive epidemic ? So, again, we see that a brief exposure to the pestilential atmosphere of the swamps of the Guinea coast is often sufficient to induce an attack of the most rapidly fatal forms of tropical fever ; but it may be long before the dweller among the marshy lands of temperate climates, inhaling the paludal poison in its less concentrated form, becomes affected with intermittent fever ; yet no one has any hesitation in recognizing the connection of cause and effect in the latter case, as in the former. So, again, the resident in a town, where the insufficiency of the drainage causes the surface-moisture to be imperfectly carried off, and to be not merely charged with the malaria of vegetable decomposition, but with the miasmatic emanations of animal putrescence, may be free from serious disorder, if the cause does not operate in sufficient intensity ; yet he becomes liable in a greatly increased degree to the opera- tion of almost every morbific agent, and especially to that 820 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. The late Samuel Bowley. A valuable suggestion by Mr. C. Kegan Paul. The decep- tive cha- of the various forms of fever-poison ; and no one who lias paid even a slight degree of attention to the result of the sanitary inquiries which have now been carried on for many years past, hesitates in admitting the relation of cause and effect between insufficiency of drainage and the higher rate of mortality in undrained localities, although not only days and weeks, but months and years, may be required for the operation of that cause upon the animal system." But even supposing that an innocent dietetic dose of alcohol had been discovered, all reasonable arguments tend to prove that abstinence would even then be preferable to moderation. In a letter published in the Temperance Record (July 3, 1879), the late Samuel Bowley said, " Total abstinence is simple, clear, and safe for all. Moderation gives no help to the drunkard. Total absti- nence, by God's blessing, has reclaimed thousands. Mode- ration keeps alive the insidious temptation, but supplies no strength to the weak to resist its power. Total abstinence, by removing the temptation, effectually protects all. Moderate drinking necessarily requires the continuance of the manufacture and sale to supply its demands. Total abstinence quietly, but effectually, annihilates the traffic with all its abounding evils. Moderation attracts the young by the apparent absence of danger. Total abstinence removes the danger, and thus secures their permanent safety. Moderation leads the masses to the public-house, total abstinence keeps them outside." In an article on Abstinence and Moderation in To-Day (January, 1884), Mr. C. Kegan Paul very appositely says that, even if an invalid believes that in giving up what is called a moderate supply of alcohol, " he is giving up a source of strength, either mental or bodily, I would suggest, even supposing this to be a possible danger, that, whereas he knows that drink is sapping his strength, weakening his will, lowering his bodily tone, abstinence can do no more, while it may do much less, and if he is to be a weakling under any circumstances he had better be a sober than a drunken invalid." The worker, whether he is a clergyman, an author, or a day-labourer, who turns to alcohol to build himself up SPECIOUS REASONINGS ON THE USE OF ALCOHOL. 321 aftei' a hard clay's work, simply balances one exhaustive racterofthe process with another — the exhaustion of labour with the [rl^u^tedto exhaustion of the system caused by its efforts to dispose the moderate of the alcohol. A certain sense of relief, of apparent aufohoiin return of equilibrium, may be felt because of the change cases of ex- consequent upon the transfer of the exhausting process from labour, from one domain of the system to another. But this sense of relief is purchased at the expense of the sum total and term of active efficiency. The nervous system irritated by alcohol will exact larger and larger doses for procuring the binef and deceptive reUef ; greater efforts will be exacted of the system for getting rid of it, and thus the two exhaustions going on in seemingly parallel lines, will gradually manifest convergence until at last the powers of endurance and labour will more or less abruptly collapse. § 76. Of the effects of "moderate" drinking on the Dr. Grindrod. temper and disposition, Dr. Grindrod (op. cit.) remarks— pro!ufce(fby"' " Experience demonstrates that the moderate but moderate habitual use of inebriating liquors inflames the passions upontemper and renders the disposition susceptible of even sliofht andjudg- provocation. It weakens, if it does not to a great degree destroy, the powers of reflection, deliberation, and judg- ment ; the relations of things are viewed through a coloured and distorted medium, and with these radical transitions there follows an utter inability to estimate character and actions, with dispassionateness and discrimination. Aristotle observes that man while in a sober state reasons with correctness, because he makes a proper use of his judgment ; in a state of utter intoxication, he does not reason at all ; when, however, he is partially under the influence of wine, he reasons inaccurately, and therefore readily falls into error and mischief." Says Dr. Baer (AlcohoUsmus, Berlin, 1878), " Undis- Dr. Baer on turbecl reflection and quiet comparison, ci'itical regard and prod^uced^on delibei'ate judgment, impartial observation of facts and the mental pro- weighing of their relationships — such are the mental alcohol. processes to which mankind owes the entire treasure of positive knowledge, including the progress of natural science, technique, and industry ; such processes are cer- tainly not promoted hy alcohol.^' The Rev. Dr. Hewitt says that " the French drink to Dr. Hewitt T 322 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. on the cha- racter of moderate drinking among the French. just that point at wbicli the moral sense and judgment are laid asleep, but all their other faculties remain awake. If they do not drink to absolute stupefaction or intoxication, it is because sensuality with Frenchmen is a science and a system." To-day it would not be fair to say this of Frenchmen only. The moral responsi- bility of the moderate drinker. Equally deplorable are the effects of "moderate" drinking on man's sense of duty to his fellows. Moderate drinkers often argue that as they have always beeu moderate, have never exceeded, nor even been tempted to exceed, they can see no reason why they should forego what they regard as an innocent indulgence, if not a positive benefit, because there are weak people who lack judgment or power to restrain their appetites within proper limits.* * "An analysis of the moral elements alleged to be strengthened by temptation in the exceptional cases of 'superior' virtue, will not justify the position of indifference to the fate and feebleness of others. The moral elements involved are two-fold : intellectual and emotional. First, a person declines to do a certain act, because, though pleasant at the moment, it is unfitting in its relations, and profitless in the long run. It is a violation of law, and therefore nn- philosophical or foolish. All sin is so, if we could but see it : and when we actually decline pleasant sins, we do see it. This may be called the 'sense' of virtue. But, second, there is the 'sensibility' of virtue. We decline sin as sin, that is, because it is a ' wrong ' thing : because it is a relation which is bad objectively, and the doing of which would put us in a bad relation subjectively . In other words, our virtue is at once our purity, our humanity, and our piety ; we abstain from transgressing law out of regard to the interests of our- self and mankind, and out of reverence to the Creator of the law. If these perceptions and feelings are strong, we shall act upon them habitually — in other words, we shall crystallize our nature in the mould of virtue. Is not that better than spasmodic attempts at virtue, with the risk or reality of frequent failure ? But the state of mind, and attitude of being, here described, is just as true of the Abstainer from all strong-drink, as of the Abstainer from (what he calls) ' excess.' Both resist temptation for essentially the same reasons — but the one happens to know more accurately where the evil com- mences, and the other certainly feels more tempted to yield to the temptation in consequence of having a liking for the driuk. ' Resist beginnings : whatso'er is ill, Though it appear light and of little moment, SPECIOUS EEASOXINGS ON THE USE OF ALCOHOL. 323 In a letter to the Inquirer (J^ovember 18, 1882), the The Rev. Rev. Stopford A. Brooke, after likening the conrse of the Krooke'on ' drinker to a journey, says, "The question is, seeing that this point. the journey is so deadly a one, ought a man to begin it at all ? If he begin he is in danger of going on, and there is not one inch of the way which is safe ; for alcohol has this peculiar property, that it always lures onwards, that one glass asks for another. The naoderate drinker is obliged almost daily to resist that allurement, and he is in con- tinued peril of failures to resist ; and, indeed, it is a wonder be is not more afraid, for the whole mass of those who have been killed by alcoholic diseases, who have been made criminals and brutes by alcohol, whom alcohol has driven mad, and who have sown in their children the seeds which afterwards quickened weakness of constitution, on which any disease seizes, into idiotcy or mania or early death, began in the same way, went the first stage with the moderate drinker, but could not resist the invitation for more which the first stage invariably makes. It is because all this is so terribly true that we say, and with justice and fairness, that the moderate drinker is in danger, and that the example he sets does more harm than he is aware of." But, regarding the habit for the moment as the innocent indulgence or benefit which the moderate drinker claims, what if these weak ones could be strengthened by this self-denial on the part of the strong ? And if this does not impress, let us come closer, and ask how it will be if the weak one shall appear in our own household, be a beloved son, who cannot stay his hand as we have been able to stay ours ? Ah ! then the narrow reasoning falls through, and in the degradation of our own child we first feel how it is that the thousands and tens of thousands of other parents, mourning and ashamed, had a claim that we failed to Think of it thus— that what it is, angmented, Would mn to strong and sharp extremities ; Deem of it, therefore, as a serpent's e^g, Which, hatched, would, as its kind, grow mischievous ; Then crush it in the shell.' Shakespeee." — Dr. F. R. Lees, in Temperance Text-Bool-, vol. i. (London, 1884). 324 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. recognize, and how their shame and sorrow is our reproach. The Rev. Says the Rev. James Smith, in his Temperance Refor- "in refutaUon '^nation and its Claims upon the Christian Church (London, of the argil- 1875), "It is Urged against the temperance reformation moderation that temperance is a greater virtue than abstinence. It is 'b^'t^'"'^'^*''*'^ urged that moderation is the dictate both of reason and Scripture, abstinence the dictate of fanaticism and bigotry — the latter, being unnatural and unreasonable, will defeat its own end, and by producing a reaction will foster the very evil it is meant to cure; you might as well abjure food because some are gluttons, or take a pledge never to speak because language is often abused, as abjure strong drink or take a pledge to abstain because some become drunkards. " Such reasoning has a superficial look of plausibility, but it will not bear examination. It assumes that strong drink is a necessity, or least very useful, and that its ordinary use is in accordance with nature and reason. But if this be not so, if abstinence be more reasonable and natural than di-inking, the argument is worthless. There can be no reaction where there is nothing to react, and the desire for strong drink never originates m abstinence from it, but in the use of it. If it were a natural appetite, its unnatural repression would, in all probability, produce a reaction ; but it is not natural, and our contention is, that the more the laws of nature are understood, the chai'acter of strong di'ink examined, and the dictates of reason and science obeyed, the more general will the practice of abstinence become. " It is, no doubt, a matter of frequent occurrence that where intemperate habits have been already formed, a period of enforced abstinence is succeeded by a deeper debauch ; but such a case is quite beside the mark, unless it can be shown that the craving for strong drink was formed originally in consequence of abstinence, and that a similar craving is likely to be formed in cases of habitual voluntary abstinence, which is directly contrary to science and experience. The analogy between abstinence from. strong drink and from food is clearly inadmissible, unless some specific kind of food of a highly unwholesome and dangerous character be selected on which to base the SPECIOUS REASONINGS ON THE USE OF ALCOHOL. 825 argument ; but in that case the argument is manifestly destroyed. We object to strong drink as a wrong kind of drink, and we would equally object to any kind of food of which the characteristic ingredient was alcohol." In the Church Sunday School Magazine (September, c.Kegan 1883), Mr. C. Kegan Paul says— LmUoim' " It is admitted that for the drunkard, for the man who has a craving for drink, total abstinence is needful ; but we are told that moderation is a better thing, and that those who can use their liberty aright had better do so. Bat see how such argument looks from the side of the drinker. In the first place, not all who have these cravings, and who are therefore in imminent danger, are ready to admit that the case is so ill with them. They are not prepared to say, as it were, to the world by the fact of abstinence, that being unable to govern their appetites they put away temptation once for all, nor is there any reason why they should thus introduce every one into the dark secrets of their souls. But knowing ' the plague of their own heart,' they may well be content to have this private reason for joining a band of persons who give up strong drink for the equally true, but less urgent reason, that abstinence for social causes, perhaps on all grounds of health and morals, is the better way. " Besides, there is something mocking and cynical in going to a person to whom drink is a temptation — the power of which is difficult to realize by those who have given little attention to the matter — who is shaken by the very scent of drink as by some outside physical force, who craves for alcohol as the hart pants for the water-brooks, even when he knows it is like the rill in German story, Avhich babbled as it ran along, ' Whoever drinks of me will become a wild beast ' — there is something cynical, I say, in virtually appealing to such a one, ' Tou to whovi this is so tremendous a struggle must malie it, hid I to lohom it is next to none loill not share your hurden loith you.' " But God sometimes speaks through a single individual experience with a voice that smites like a sword sheer through the most impregnable walls of plausible and specious argument in which we selfishly intrench and con- ceal a cherished evil. Nothing that any one can say, be it ever so cleverly, in favour of alcoholic liquors, can stand S2G THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Oharlps Lamb's warning appeal to }-oung men. Dr. Howard Crosby's ob- jections to tlie temper- ance pledge, and Mr. AVendell Phillips' reply. for an instant before but one sucli heart-rent warning as these words of Cliarles Lamb : — " if a wish could trans- port me back to those days of youth, when a draught from the next clear spring could slake any heats which summer suns and youthful exercise had power to stir up in the blood, how gladly would I return to thee, pure element, the drink of children, and of childlike holy hermits ! In my dreams I can sometimes fancy thy cool refreshment purling over my burning tongue — but my waking stomach rejects it. That which refreshes innocence only makes me sick and faint. But is there no middle tvay betwixt total abstinence and the excess which kills you ? For your sake, readei-, and that you may never attain to my ex- perience, with pain I must utter the dreadful truth, that there is none, none." § 77. The question of the worth and effectiveness of the temperance pledge has evoked a deal of specious reasoning. Dr. Howard Crosby, of IS^ew York, an influential advocate of the so-called moderate use of alcohol, in his lecture on A Calm Vietv of the Temperance Question, delivered in Tremont Temple, Boston (January 10, 1881), declared, the temperance pledge to be "a most pernicious instrument for debauching the conscience . . . always an injury and never a help to a true morality ... a substitute for principle, an invitation to further sin." In the same hall, two weeks later, Mr. Wendell Phillips replied, and concerning the true significance of taking the pledge, he said — " Dr. Crosby passes to the great weapon of the temper- ance movement, the pledge. This he calls ' unmanly,' ' a strait jacket ; ' says it kills self-respect and undermines all character. " Hannah More said, ' We cannot expect perfection in any one, but we may demand consistency of eveiy one.' " It doe-sn't tend to show the sincerity of these critics of our cause, when Ave find them objecting in us to what they themselves uniformly practise on all other occasions. If we continue to believe in their sincerity, it can only be at the expense of their intelligence. Dr. Crosby is un- doubtedly a member of a church. Does he mean to say that when his church demanded his signature to its creed and his pledge to obey its discipline, it asked what it was SPECIOUS REASONINGS ON THE USE OF ALCOHOL. 821 'unmanly' in him to grant, and wliat destroys an in- dividual's character — that his submission to this is ' fore- going his reasoning,' ' sinking back to his nonage ' ? etc. Of course he assents to none of these things. He only objects to a temperance pledge, not to a church one. " The husband pledges himself to his wife, and she to him for life. Is the marriage ceremony, then, a curse, a hindrance to virtue and progress ? " I have known men who, borrowing money, refused to sign any promissory note : they thought it unmanly, and evidence that I distrusted them. Does Dr. Crosby think the world should change its customs and immediately adopt that plan ? " Society rests in all its transactions on the idea that a solemn promise, pledge, assertion, strengthens and assures the act. It recognizes this principle of human nature. The witness on the stand gives solemn promise to tell the truth; the officer, about to. assume place for one year or ten, or for life, pledges his word and oath ; the grantor in a deed binds himself for all time by record ; churches, societies, universities, accept funds on pledges to appro- priate them to certain purposes, and to no other — these and a score more of instances can be cited. In any final analysis all these rest on the same pi'inciple as the temper- ance pledge. No man ever denounced them as unmanly. I sent this month a legacy to a literary institution on certain conditions, and I'eceived in return its pledge that the money should ever be sacredly used as directed. The doctor's principle would unsettle society, and if one pro- posed to apply it to any cause but temperance, practical men would quietly put him aside as out of his head. " These cobweb theories, born of isolated cloister life, do not bear exposure to the midday sun or the rude winds of practical life. This is not a matter of theory. It must be tested and settled by experience and results. Thousands and tens of thousands attest the value of the pledge. It never degraded, it only lifted them to a higher life." § 78. To take up, in closing, some of the well-worn The fallacy arguments, based on exceptional instances, which greatly of positive help in forming and cementing the habit of drink, I may cite in arguing the very common one of the man who says he has drunk tiie general daily, one, two or three glasses of wine or beer, with or J28 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. from the exceptional. Examples. wlttoiit a glass or two of whis ky, for the last t en,, fifteen, or twenty years. " Just look at me ! " h e s ays. " Don't I look ^well ? Why, I look in better health than you do, and I V? never known a sick day. Don t that prove that moderate drinking is gooj l ^^a maji ? " This sort of talk never seems to arrest attention as to the selfishness * of thinking of such a broad question only as it concerns the individual. Concerning the individual, it sounds convincing, and does convince, or rather satisfy many. But considering it impartially, we have to inquire into the character and condition of this man. Is he tru stwor thy on other p oint s ? for if not, there is, of c ours e, no reason to take his ie s^ira ony on thig. If he is ti'ust- Avorthy, the value of his testimony depends upon what are his notions ofl ^ jilth ; whether he means by health merely the ability of daily attending in the usual raore or less humdrum way to his duties, or the bounding energy which maTes work a p leasu re, and leaves onea' siorplus for joj and rest when wo"rk is done. We must know i¥nis parents or grandparents drank, and to what degree ; whether he was orderly or di^olute in his youth'pat what age he began to use intoxicants, what his occupation has been, and what care or precautions he has takenlo preserve his health. On such and many other points full information is essential to a just estimate of his evidence in favojir of drinl^ing. Until cases of moderate drinking continued through two or three genejations can show generally healthy descendants in the third generation, this plea, usually claimed as a " knock -Hown " argument, has absolutely no value, except to point The self- absorption of the man who makes it, and those who are influenced by it. Another argument very frequently advanced is that drinkers, and not only moderate ones, l i y ^ longer than other people, unless accident or high living carry them off. Such an argfument regarding alcohol is neither better * " One long-lived glutton or drunkard kills more by his example, and the flattering hopes those who know not their own strength and what they were made to bear, entertain, than Hippocrates ever Baved." — Geoi'ge Cheyne, in Natural Method of curing the Diseases of the Buihj and the Mind. (London, 1742.) SPECIOUS EEASONINGS ON THE USE OF ALCOHOL. 829 founded nor more logical than it would be if applied to exceptioiialjpngevity in cases of persons living in malarial localities, or surviving tlie ordeal of the Sier ra Le one, or employed as needle-grinders in Sheffield.. According to statistics, the age of the latter seldom exceeds fortj years. In the face of this fact, occasional instances of a longer term of existence among them would hardly lead to an advocacy of the employment of needle-grinding as con- ducive to long life. Neither would the fact that a man and his family have lived in fair health all their lives to a good, old age over a foetid cesspool — as seems to have at times happened — be likely to be advanced as an argument in favour of generally establishing such reservoirs of pestilence under the family hearth-stone ! I once heard of an extraordinary accident happening to a man at work where b lasti ng,- was being done. During a premature explosion, a long piece of the drilling bar shot upward from the pit which was being excavated, and, entering the man's head under the chin, passed ve rtica lly entirely through his head, and, still ascending, fell at last at some distance. He" staggered and fell, and his instant death was naturally expected. Not so . To the amazement of all, and the downrightincredulity of ph ysicia ns, he recovered, and, Avhereas he had been before the accident morose and un- reliable, he was now genial and to be depended upon. But from this it would hardly be argued that men should subject themselves to this sort of exp erim ent as probably conducive to improvement in temper and character ! But even supposing this argument of alcoholic longevity were true, are not the d rinke rs overwhelmingly morg numerous than the abstainers ; and therefore, other things being equal, the number of ag ed dr inkers would, of course, be greater than that of ag ed a bstainers ; and what criterion of comparison has been used for the longevity ? To judge from the insurance and other statistics which are quoted in chap, x., comparing, under equitable conditions, equal numbers of drinkers and abstainers, it was found that abstainers much more generally reached an advanced age than drinkers. But what does this plea for longevity mean, urged by 330 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. people whose chief aim in life is not to live — is to kill time, not to use it ; and who, if not successful in killing time, do not anfrequently kill themselves ? If longevity were the measure of effectiveness, if drinkers counted each day a priceless boon to be used as nobly as they knew how, then indeed would this argument, if true, be powerful in favour of alcohol. But we have yet to see a man whose character has been ennobled by drinking, or a drinker Avho grows nobler and better as he grows older. On the other hand, it is a fact that some of the most effective lives have been short. And of only three years of public work — such work as no man has measured nor can measure — did not the Master say, " It is finished " ? CHAPTER XIII. WHAT CAN BE DONE ? " While drinking continues, poverty and vice will prevail ; and until this is abandoned, no regulation, no efforts, no authority under heaven, can raise the condition of the working classes. It is worse than a plague or a pestilence, and the man is no friend to his country who does not lift up his voice and proclaim his example against it." — Mr. J. Livesey, in the Moral Reformer, July 1, 1831.* " Drink, the only terrible enemy whom England has to fear." — The late Prince Leopold, Duke of Albany. § 79. In discussing the question of what can be done to reduce and vanquish the drink-evil, the limits and propor- tion of the present work restrict me in touching upon what has been done — a noble record, full of interest — to only such general mention or occasional particularization as is essential to the consideration of further reform effort. In the opening pages of this book it was pointed out that among the ancients the severest laws were put in force against drunkenness ; that it was even, and not unfrequently, punished with death. Ancient legal and historical writings are replete with edicts and instances showing that drunkenness was treated as a great crime. f Why did the temperance reform efforts in the past fail? Why have such efforts failed even up to the present century ? Why, at various times during the last fifty years, have * Mr. Livesey's first public denunciation of alcohol, t See ZenophoD, Plato, Athenseus, Plutarch, Pliny, Dion of Hali- carnassus, Diodorus Siculus^ Strabo, and others. 332 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Why past temperance cflorts failed. Their cha- racter. Early moderation Societies. apparently great strides towards temperance alternated with great relapses ? What reasons have we to expect or hope that the present popular interest and labours in the cause of temperance are sowing the seed of a permanent success ? One large general difference between past and present efforts in regard to temperance lies in this broad distinction between the two ages, that in antiquity the nation was for the government, or rather the sovereign ; while in our days governments, generally speaking", exist for the people. Antiquity lacked the innumerable means of bodily and mental communication, which, irrespective of the demarca- tions of birth, fortune, and special circum.stance, suflB.ce in our day to bring men together on one common intellectual level in the study of mankind. Among the ancients, temperance decrees proceeded from the sovereign. They were framed to include only such of his subjects as enjoyed the royal favour, and to these the royal mandates were a matter of blind obedience, not of persuasion or conviction. Such decrees were as fitful in their character and occurrence as the whims of the monarch issuing them ; their observance depended on the subjects' loyalty, usually an allegiance of craft or fear ; and they contained no element of reform, although at long intervals, great historians, philosophers, and physicians sounded the note of warning. In later ages the popes sometimes united with the rulers of Europe to stay the e^dl of drink, but to little purpose. So-called moderation societies were even formed among the nobles of Germany. Dr. Baer mentions, in his Alcoliolismus (Berlin, 1878), that " The First Order of Moderation " was founded by Frederick III. ; that the badge, a cross with a design of tankards, and inscribed Avitli the motto Halt Mass (be moderate), was worn by the emperor at festivities; that his son, Maximilian I., publicly expressed his abhon^ence of intemperance at a number of his diets; that the knightly order of St. Christopher " for the abolition of profanity and drinking," was founded early in the six- teenth centur}' by Sigismund von Diodrichstein, a noble- man of Carinthia and Styria ; and that a few years later an abstinence fraternity was instituted by Louis, Count WHAT CAX BE DONE? 333 Palatine, and Rictard, Elector of Treves, fifteen bisliops and princes, and many nobles entering it. Dr. Baer also refers to the Palatine Order of the Golden Special Ring, the symbol of membership being a gold ring, which theirfaUure. was forfeited back to the community by any member who proved recreant in drinking toasts ; and mentions the famous temperance order founded by the Landgrave of Hesse in 1600. Yet all these societies, and numerous others which succeeded them, like the efforts made in antiquity, soon passed away. Why ? Chiefly for these reasons, first, because they lacked what we possess — the knowledge that alcohol is always a poison, and therefore naturally imagined the only remedy necessary lay in moderation ; secondly, because these societies did not originate in moral conviction of the nature of the evil they were to operate against : they were not formed with any reference to rooting out intemperance among the people, but were due rather to the proud egoism of the nobles, who, indifferent to the vice as it existed among the masses, nevertheless disdained to practise in common with them. This century (nineteenth) has seen a marked departure Character- from the whole past in a great many respects, but in ^oj^rn^^^. perhaps nothing so decisively as in the constantly in- perance creasing recognition of the sovereignty of the individual, ™°'*^'^'^^'^ • and the absolute interdependence of all individuals, high and low, rich and poor, of which recognition the general education of all youth is a proud instalment. Whence we have the steadily growing tendency to level all barriers interfering with a universal mental development ; and in the struggle for progress, in the sturdy investigation of the causes of the inequalities which constitute all the difference between worth and worth- lessness, between happiness and misery, the students of humanity have discovered that alcohol is a chief agent, the chief agent, in the sense that intemperance produces, is often produced by, is associated with, and gathers tw itself, all other kinds of vice and degradation. Hence the modem temperance movement is based on knowledge, conviction, and aspiration, and on a sentiment of fellowship and fraternity much deeper and stronger than has ever been felt before. 334 THE FOUNDATIOiSr OF DEATH. The epoch originating the present popular temperance movement ; how it pro- gressed, col- lapsed, and revived. This points ihe essential diiJerence between the past and the present. About fifty years ago there sprang up almost simul- taneously from among the hard-working masses of America, Germany, Great Britain, and Sweden, the core of the pre- sent popular temperance movement. These little bodies took the position that alcoholic drinks are always harmful, to the individual, society, and the State. They discontinued drinking among themselves. They went, like the apostles of olden times, among the people to preach the only temperance gospel ; they were loyal, patient, and earnest, and their words, works, and lives carried conviction into millions of hearts. Still, in a few years the whole movement had subsided, and most of those who had promised reform went back to their old habits and associations, but — not all. Meanwhile, the great advance made in physiological science had naturally been applied to the investigation of the effects of alcohol on the human system, and the ominous dicta of that science, coupled with the appalling rcDorts of the effects of drunkenness as made by a more perfect statistical system, corroborated and strengthened by the genuine and noble pleas of the little band of faith- ful ones, re-awakened public interest, and this fresh impulse, supported by increased practical knowledge of the true character of the evil, has led to many attempts and plans for reform. § 80. The present remedial efforts are usually sum- mai'ized under the following three heads — political, social, and individual. And this being the order in which success is most generally anticipated, I will deal with them in this order, although, for my own part, I believe that individual and social reform must be the basis of any permanently good temperance legislation. There seems to be much misunderstanding and con- fusion as to what may reasonably be expected from Government. Summary of As regards England, every Englishman knows that WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 335 this Government is theoretically of the people, through the character the people, and for the people. Any Government lacking ofthe^'*^"*^ this qnalification would soon cease to be. powersand Modern English history teems with incidents sub- ofufe"""^ stantiating this statement. Even a single unpopular British 1 ,, 1 rf • "l J ii Government measure has more than once been sumcient to overthrow in internal the Government passing it. All that exists, therefore, reforms, politically speaking, by its very existence proves the nation's acceptance thereof, just as much as its disappear- ance would prove the nation's disapprobation. But while this is true theoretically, and would, in any matter which thoroughly aroused the masses, become true in fact, we have to remember that the masses are slow to bestir themselves. They are like the cow m the pasti^ re, to use a homely illustration — -"calm, benevolent, cud-chew- ing, drows ily 'Ihi Tifferent to what s ort of me asures or r eform s are being adopted by the fence^akers, secr^jjig and daily yieldjpg with little demur lu^j^ifeams of milk ; Imt. if the fift w be t oo m uch baited, the udders secrete little, yield less, and a viciojas not-to-be-mistaken k ick upsets the milk-pail, milk, and ^^ The masses have practically let their power slip out of The sove- their hands, and, though"They can at aTrftime resuniejt, anf^^n^^*^' busy anxT inured to routine, they are not readily rousedto J'^-'PO"^'- do so. Then the .stiffrage is restricted, the"Taijd and masses. wealth of the country is con troll ed by the few^agnates, and while the masses acquiesce in this state oralfairs, the will of the people a mount s to the will of the magnates. This will is expressed through the members of Parlia- ment, and the Government being party government, its existence depends upon its loyalty to party interests. Both of the ruling parties vie with each other for popular favour — the Conservative in the direction of maintaining the past in politics ; the Liberal in the direction of a methodic, slow, and safe transformation and extension of political powers and rights in accordance with the impera- tive needs of the age. Both parties champion popular opinion when out of oiEce, and both of them when in office, as far as is safe for their tenure of office — forced perhaps by exigencies and considerations they had not pre-estimated — ignore and defy it. In such circumstances the Govern- ment, being unable to pass measures without its party's 83G THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. consent, cannot safely ignore or resist its party ; and, as the wealth of the country is largely concerned in the liqaor trade, and as the liquor trade is the largest and surest resource of governmental revenue, it must be apparent that pressure for complete or only partial prohibition, unless such pressure be brought to bear by the solid masses of the country, is not likely to meet with ready response from either Pai-liament or Government. The people Another mistaken notion as to the nature and function f^Mhe^*''^^ of Government, is that of supposing it to be a moral morality of guardian of the people. The office of a constitutional and G™Mn- government is nothing more and nothing less than that of inent,notthe faithfully executing the laws and decrees of the country in for^that of an almost machine-like manner, and of taking no initiative the people, for either making or abrogating laws without unmistak- able evidence of the nation's readiness and desire. The avalanches of contumely which have been heaped upon governments for not supporting legislative measures of or tending towards prohibition, have mostly sprung from this erroneous assumption, that the Government is the moral guardian of the nation.* If temperance is made a national instead of a party question. Parliament and Government will make no objection, because on national questions Parliament speaks for the people, and on such questions the Government is as sensitive to Parliament as is the exchange to financiers. As long as the national will is not pronouncedly against the liquor trade. Parliament will remain practically deaf to special petitions ; but as soon as the nation sees the evil of the liquor trade no Parliament can uphold it. Any attempt by Government to fore- stall the popular mind on this question would be a usurpation of popular rights, likely to be productive of * I wish, however, not to be misunderstood as meaning that morality ought to be separated from politics. I think it indispensable to vital morality that no division should exist between private and public morality ; personally, I believe the two to be inseparable. But it is the people who are responsible for the morality of Parliament and Government, not the Government for that of the people. If a country is animated by morality, its laws, representatives, and govern- ment must be moral ; but if, on the contrary, greed, expediency, and political sophistry are the motive forces of national life, they will inevitably get their completest expression through the representative and executive bodies. WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 337 more harm than good to the temperance cause ; * although of course it is not onlj laudable, but the positive duty of Government members to, in an unofficial capacity, assist in educating the popular mind on this subject. As Zschokke says, in his Brannhoein Pest (The Brandy Pest, Aran, 1857), " All laws are powerless for ex- tinguishing an evil which has taken root in the life of the people ; it is from the people itself that the reform of morals must proceed, but no government is strong enough to bring it about." § 81. It is a grave question whether the continuous Danccers bending of all efforts in the direction of legislation does pont'ic'a"" not divert the individual mind from the individual import- agitation on ance of the subject ; whether this making of a profoundly ™'^" '**'^'^ * moral subject into one of legislative controversy, of making a national and race issue a shuttlecock between political parties — a stake of gambling for office — is not vitiating the cause of temperance. The defence of the counti'y against invading armies is not allowed to be a question of party tactics, neither should the question which, in case of an invasion, would more than any other decide the issue of the contest. As in the case of an invasion, her army and navy would The para- be England's dependence, the enforcement of absolute portance of sobriety amons: the defenders of the country, officers and sobriety for '.' IT T c /-I the piotec- men alike, would seem to be a paramount duty of Grovern- tinn of ment. History fui'nishes ample precedent that nearly all "ndeprad- the ancient, many mediceval, and some of the modern ence. powers (notably American) prohibited and prohibit drink- ing in their armies and navies. In the vigorous days of ancient Carthage and Rome, the penalty for drunkenness in the army was death ; and long after, when the people generally had become aban- doned to drink and debauchery, the discipline of sobriety was enforced among the troops, although at last they fell to drink and then their countries were vanquished. It is an historic fact that the Anglo-Saxon power was The battle of lost tlirough * " We win a snrer victory when public opinion is with us than drink. when by catch-legislation we anticipate that public opinion, and suffer, according to the law of the universe, a swift reaction." — -Bishop of Rochester, in his address on Temperance at Victoria Hall, Lambeth, Nov. 12, 1883. Z 338 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. conquered by its intemperance, just as were Babylon and Syracuse of antiquity. Hume states that King Edgar strove to check intemperance by allowing only one ale- house to each town. Still, we find that the Anglo-Saxon army passed the night before the momentous battle of Hastings in drink and riot, while the numerically inferior Norman forces passed it in prayer and fasting. Says Fuller, in his Church History of Britain : — " The English being revelling before, had, in the morn- ing, their brains arrested for the arrearages of the undi- gested fumes of the former night, and were no better than drunk when they came to fight." * England must look to it that the ravages from drink are stopped before it is too late.f Commenting on the * E. C. Delevan, in his Temperance Essays (New York, 1866), quotes from the Richmond Enquirer, Confederate organ (Oct. 6, 1864), the following concerning the downfall of the Confederacy of the Southern States :— " Do you ask for an explanation of these rapidly occurring disasters in a portion of the State where the Confederates, until the 19th alt., never suffered defeat ? Here is the key to our reverses. Officers of high position, yes, of very high position, have, to use an honest English word, been drank — too drunk to command themselves, much less an army, a division, a brigade, or a regiment. And when officers in high command are in the habit of drinking to excess, we may be sure their pernicious example will be followed by those in lower grades. The cavalry forces that had been operating in the valley were already demoralized, and since their last visit to Maryland they have been utterly worthless." t In last year's session of Parliament (1882), it was stated, in defence of the soldiers' beer-drinking, that the beer consumed by them was not the vile stuif ordinarily sold; but this argument is simply saying that there is a difference in the kinds and degrees of harmfulness in a specified compound, since all alcohols in whatever quantity or quality have been proven to be poisonous. In a remarkable symposium contributed by several Belgian military surgeons to the Beljian Army Journal (1879), one of the writers urges earnestly that the drink-evil in the army should bo combated by forbidding the sale of brandy and other spirits in the canteens of the barracks. A vast quantity of spirits is, it is stated, sold in these establishments, and it is in them that the young recruit begins to drink and acquires a taste for liquor, with the sanction, as it were, of the military authorities, who supply the premises where the drinking goes on. And not only does the soldier in every interval between drills repair to the canteen to refresh himself with a "nip," but brandy is bought and carried into the men's rooms, where non- commissioned officers and men carouse together, to the great prejudica WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 339 sreneral coBclition of some troops that had just passed The Echo on through Canterhury en route to India, the Echo (January fn"the Trmy* 4, 1884) said, " The march through the town to the station the next morning was most disgraceful. The men were too drunk to keep ranks, and dropped portions of their equipment as they staggered along. At the station they were quite mutinous, I'efusing to obey orders ; and one, in North-country brogue, was heard to say he would shoot his captain when he reached India." Some of the principal English officers, in both army and navy, inveigh frequently against drinking among the troops. In a letter to John Bayley, Esq., President of the Grantham Temperance Association, April 21, 1881, Sir Garnet, now Lord Wolseley, wrote : — " The cause of temperance is the cause of social ad- Lord vancement. Temperance means less crime, and more ^°t^g'a^ thrift and more of comfort and prosperity for the people. and drink. " Nearly all the crime in our army can be traced to intoxication, and I have always found that when with any army or body of troops in the field there was no issue of spirits, and where their use was prohibited, the health as well as the conduct of the men were all that could be wished for." And to a Good Templar meeting, held in Morley Hall, Hackney, in November of the same year, he wrote : — • * " About ninety per cent, of the crime in our array is owing to drunkenness, and when our men are removed from the temptation of intoxicating liquor, crime is prac- tically unknown amongst them. During the operations I conducted in South Africa in 1879, my own personal escort was composed almost exclusively of teetotalers. They had very hard work to do, but grumbling was never heard from them, and a better behaved set of men I was never assisted with — a fact which I attributed to their being almost all total abstainers." In his speech to the troops at Chatham, f Cardinal Cardinal Manning narrates of Sir Charles Napier, that — the'same.*"' of discipline. If this sale of spirits were forbidden, better coffee would, it is argued, be provided in the canteens, and the soldier woald drink this instead of brandy, to the great benefit of his health. * See Alliance News, November 5, 1881. t See The Universe, July 22, 1882. statement. 340 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. "Wlien lie was 'tumbled over, with, forty others, by the sunstroke,' and being himself the only one who did not succumb, he attributed his escape from death to the fact of his being a total abstainer, sapng, ' the sun found no ally in my brains.' " Major-General Sir Evelyn TVood, in addressing the same meeting, is reported * as saying : — Major- " That his experience fully bore out what his Eminence FvTn ^''^ had said. Some of the soldiers present would doubtless AVood, in say, ' Oh, it's all very well for the Cardinal to talk about of CMdinlr total abstinence ; but it won't do for us. We cannot act Manning's up to it ! ' "Well, he could assure them it was a matter of em»n YQcrret to him that, in his early career, in the navy and the K^aval Brigade, he had not the advantages of being a total abstainer. . . . Some four years ago, Colonel Hope, of the 12th, had told him. that if he had to go through his thirty years' service again he would become a teetotaler. Throughout the Crimea those were the best and most healthy soldiers and sailors who did not touch intoxicating drink. He (Sir Evelyn Wood) also served three years in India, including the last fifteen months of the mutiny, and he could positively state those who drank nothing were the best men. He went to the Gold Coast, and during the hundred and fifty days they were in one place he put in a hundred and forty-six days' service, only to find himself beaten by the attendance of a man who was a teetotaler. During the last three years he had rounded the Cape of Good Hope four times, and he found that the stokers who had to work in the heated stokeholes of the large ocean steamers never drank anything but barley water when in the tropics. Throughout the Zulu campaign he had two reo'iments under him, one young, and the other old. There was little or nothing to choose between them for good conduct or discipline, because they were unable to get any- thing to drink. They were the 30th and the 90th Light Infantry, and they stood at the head of the list of the British army for good conduct. He had beforehand taken particular care there should be no liquor in the place, as he feared any signs of drinking might lead to a disaster before the enemy." § 82. A necessary step toward the solution of the liquor * See The Universe, July 22, 1882. WHAT CAN BE DONE ? S41 question, it seems to me, is that all points which make it a party question should be removed. As a result of political party agitation on this question, we find the whole machinery of the wealth, intelligence, and political influence interested in the defence of the liquor trade, engaged in forming a third party strong- enough to hold the balance of power in the House of Commons. They have, happily, not yet succeeded. It is still fresh in memory how the liquor-dealers in the Mischiefs last election strained every point to secure the election of resuitedfrom only such candidates as were in favour of their retaining prematureiy their present privileges. The Alliance News (January 4, uquor- 1879) cites a conspicuous example. " At the election of a gpff^.^'e^fgnc^ member for Bristol," it says, "Mr. R. C. Smart, Treasurer unions.by in- of the Licensed Victuallers' Association, said, ' Politics poTitiSr'^''' mean self-interest,' and Mr. Collins ' hoped and trusted agitation fur they would all act according to their consciences for the ^"^^ ' ' i° • henefit of the trade.' And Canon Ellison,* in his admirable letter to Earl Stanhope, on The Church of England Temperance Society in the Recent Election (1880), drew further attention to this point : — " The Licensed Victuallers," he says, " for the first time, I believe, in our history, publicly, formally, as a body with interests of their own separate from those of the whole community, had drawn up their test for Parliamen- tary candidates, upon the acceptance of which their support, as a united body, was to depend. At a meeting of the Licensed Victuallers' Protection Society of London, Mr. J. F. Deacon, the chairman of the society, who presided on the occasion, stated that very complete arrangements had been made for dealing loith candidates at the General Election. To every gentleman tvho sought their suffrages four test ques- tions loould he submitted, and the ivay in lohich those questions were answered woxdd decide their action toicards the candidate. The questions are as folloics : — " 1. Will you, if returned to Parliament, oppose every Bill or measure which aims at transferring the licensing powers from the present authorities (the Justices of the Peace) to periodically elected local boards or bodies, municipal, parochial, or the like ? " 2. Will you support and advocate the principle that * Chairman of the Church of England Temperance Society. 342 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. for any depreciation in the value of the property of licensed victuallers, insulting from future legislation, they should be entitled to fair and full pecuniary compensation ? " 3. Will you oppose any measure having for its objects the curtailment of, or interference with, the present hours of opening and closing public-houses, either on Sundays or on other days of the week ? "4. Will you give your support to any measure having for its object the placing of all ' off ' licenses under the same authority and regulation as other licenses ? " And the state of affairs brought about by the prohibi- tory agitation in the United States is shown in the Annual Report of the Brewers' Congress, held at Washington, May, 1882. The following is a summary of it as published in the supplement of the National Temperance Advocate, of New York, June, 1883 :— " The twenty-second annual convention of the United States Brewers' Association was held in Washington, D.C., May 11 and 12, 1882. A Washington brewer, Mr. Heurich, representing the brewers of the national capital, called the convention to order and made an address of welcome, in which he congratulated the brewers upon their having come to the capital when the United States Congress was in session, with an opportunity to meet and greet their senators and representatives, and the officers of the govern- ment with whom they have, as brewers, business contact ; concluding with an expression of the hope that their coming might be made ' instrumental in clearing the dark clouds which, in many parts of the country, threaten our time-honoured business.' " The president of the Association, Mr. H. B. Schar- mann, of Brooklyn, N. Y., then delivered his annual address, in which he congratulated the brewers that in this country ' the consumption of beer has gone up during eighteen years 679 per cent.' " He gave the number of breweries at 2,474 ; stating that 30,000 persons are employed in the beer business, and that it has a capital of 152,524,720 dollars invested in it. There were 8,536 retail, and 2,034 wholesale dealers in malt liquors during the special- tax year ended April 30, 1881. " There were reports submitted from the ' Agitation WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 343 Committee,' the ' Publication Committee,' by the attornej, Mr. Schade, etc. The Agitation Committee reiterate their claim for beer as a ' temperance ' beverage. " The Publication Committee report that they have printed and distributed nearly 115,000 pamphlets and broadsides, and that these pamphlets are electrotyped, and, ' after a certain number of the pamphlets have been placed where most needed at the expense of the fund, additional copies, where ordered, are furnished at the actual cost of the paper and press-work.' " The report of the attorney, Mr. Schade, recounts among other things his successful opposition in Congress to the Commission of Inquiry bill, and to the measures for the pi'ohibition of the liquor tratfic in the District of Columbia and the Territories. " In response to the petitions from the brewers of Iowa, Michigan, and Indiana for financial aid to help defeat pro- hibition in those States, 2,000 dollars were appropriated to Michigan, 3,000 dollars to Iowa, 5,000 dollars to Indiana, and 500 dollars to Kansas. Much larger sums are under- stood to have been contributed throuorh other channels." As long as the masses have not become intellectually The earliest convinced that the harm done by the liquor traffic is greater ^hen pro- than the good claimed for it, such as the multifarious iiiwtioncan employment of many, and the constant and large revenue practical and it returns,* so long will any attempt to enforce prohibi- facT*^*^^"' tionj fail, and in their failure promote the traffic. Every * The terrible cost of these very advantages, in morals, health, and finance have already been pointed out in the chai^ter on Social Results. The Echo (February 7, 1884) states that in his message to the Ohio State Legislature, Governor Forster " declares that in twelve ruonths four thousand five hundred liquor saloons had gone out of existence, and that two million dollars had been added to the revenue." f England and Ireland have already witnessed the beneficial results of a partially effected prohibition. In writing on The Police of the Metropolis in 1800, Mr. Colquhoun describes the situation in London during the embargo on the dis. tilleries, 1796-97, when bread and other foods and necessaries were greatly increased in cost by the scarcity of grain ; yet the poor lived better, were more comfortable, and paid their rent with less difficulty than for many years previously, and there was both less brawling and less pawning. " This," says Mr. Colquhoun, " can only be ac- 344. THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. sincere friend of the temperance reform cries out with the eloquent Canon Fari'ar : " How long do you mean this to continue ? How long are our working classes to be hemmed in with glaring temptations, and their dwellings to be ringed by public-houses on all sides as with a cordon of fire ? How long is the reeling* army of our drunkards to be recruited by those who are now our innocent sons and daughters ? " * The writings of such men as Dr. F. R. Lees, in Eng- land ; ex-Bailie D. Lewis, in Scotland ; Judge Pitman, in America, and many others, have taken the question of the justice, wisdom, and legality of prohibition theoretically quite out of the list of disputable issues : it is only around the question of its best practicable application that doubt can still be entertained. The hopeful The extension of suffi'age, " with the enlargements of Queen's last the powers of ratepayers through the representative system, speech. including among them the regulation of the traffic in intoxicating liquors," promised in the Queen's speech, opening Parliament (1884), is a hopeful omen that we are at last to know what the people really think and want.t counted for by their bein^ denied the indulgence of gin, which had become in a great measui-e inaccessible from its very high price." And in Ireland a similar temporary prohibition measure had like con- sequences, in allusion to which the writer of An Inquiry into the Influence of Ardent Spirits in Ireland (1830) states, " The population of Ireland was enabled to consume a greater quantity of articles of Itixury and comfort than in years of absolute plenty." And yet, the popular sympathy not being enlisted, these measures with all their benefits could only be maintained for a short period, and when the reaction came, drinking and crime became more prevalent than before. * Sermon in Westminster Abbey (November 19, 1883), on the occasion of the twenty-first anniversary of the Church of England Temperance Society. t " The Grand Jury cannot withhold from the court the amaze- ment and horror which they have felt during their investigations, at the systematic countenance of and encouragement to vicious conduct, by the facilities afforded by the numberless places of resort for drinking and profligacy, thereby providing nurseries for crime and destitution ; and they earnestly hope that some effectual steps may be taken, either by the withholding of licenses or curtailing the hours for the sale of intoxicating liquors, and thus grapple with a system of demoralization as antagonistic to the interests of religion, and as WHAT CAN BE DOXE ? 345 § 83. But pending the general and full development of Various popular conviction and will, up to the point of an irresistible measures for demand that the traffic shall cease, there are various general pro- valuable initiation legislative measures in that direction, which might be taken. First in point of time is Local Option; a measure Local option, almost Avholly due to the untiring efforts and laboui's of thirty active years by the United Kingdom Alliance, and particularly to its brilliant and wise presidents, the late Sir Walter Trevelyan, and the present Sir AVilfrid Lawson, whose motion reads thus : " That the best interests of the Sir Wilfrid nation urgently require some efficient measure of legisla- ^^g^^'^ tion, by which, in accordance with the resolution already passed and re-affirmed by this House, a legal power of restraining the issue or i^enew-al of licenses for the sale of intoxicating liquors may be placed in the hands of the persons most deeply interested and affected, namely, the inhabitants themselves," and whose work for securing this reform during the years 1879 and 1880 fully equalled the efforts of Mr. Gladstone to overthrow the Beaconsfield government, both in energy, conclusiveness, and eloquence. That his Avork promises to meet with deserved success is shown in the victories he has ah^eady gained. In 1880, before the election, Mr. Gladstone went out of his way to declare that he was not in favour of local option ; but when the measure was brought into the House, Mr. Gladstone said : " I earnestly hope that at some not very distant period it may be found practicable to deal with the licensing laws, and in dealing with the licensing laws to include the reasonable and just measure for which my honourable friend (Sir Wilfrid Lawson) pleads." In three successive sessions of the present parliament the local option resolution has been passed by steadily largely increasing majorities ; on the 27th of April last it was passed in the House of Commons by a majority of 87. Concerning this result, the Times of the next morning (April 28, 1883) said: "Sir Wilfrid Lawson must be satisfied for the present with the reception he has gained injurious to the social well-bein^ of all classes of the community as it is degrading to us as an enlightened nation." — Presentment of the Grand Jury at the Central Criminal Court (London, November, 1S62). 346 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. temperance meeting in Kdinburgh, March 3, 1884. for his resolution in favour of Local Option. The announce- ment of Sir William Harcourt that the Government accepts the principle of the resolution and will take the respon- sibility of giving effect to it, has put the whole question on an entirely new level. The thing, it is now certain, will be done ; Local Option in some form or other will be granted ; the time and the manner alone remain to be determined." The Local At the great temperance meeting at Edinburgh, March Option Reso- 3^ 1884, the Rev. Mr. Adamson, in supporting the resolution the great (in favour of the Local Option resolution) — " That, whilst resolved to maintain all existing legal restrictions on the sale of intoxicating liquors, and whilst recognizing that the House of Commons has affirmed that the ratepayers should possess ' a legal power of restraining the issue and renewal of licences,' this convention hereby declares that no legislative measure on this subject will be satisfactory which does not confer upon the ratepayers in parishes, burghs, and other districts the full legal power of con- trolling the drink traffic, and also of prohibiting it, where a majority ' shall think meet and convenient ' that the traffic should not exist " — added that " he wanted to say that modern legislation was going straight in the direction of trusting all matters pertaining to the social, moral, and intellectual well-being of the people to the people them- selves ; and he needed not to tell that great meeting that on the whole they made a proper use of what they had got. At present they elected their municipal authorities, the educa- tion boards, the parochial boards, and they elected their ministers of religion. . . . Why, then, should they withhold from the common people the right to deal with the curse of intemperance ? It was said those houses were put down for the convenience of the people ; not for the convenience of the men who hold the licences, but for the benefit of the community at large. He concluded by saying they would never rest satisfied till the people Avere entrusted with the power to say whether public-houses should be set down in their midst." The attitude On May 7th (1884) a large deputation from this con- ofthe vention waited upon Sir William Harcourt, who said to toward it. them, " The views of the Government have been distinctly WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 347 stated as being in favour of the ratepayers having the power of determining in each locah'ty what they desire with reference to the drink traffic. I stated that last year in my speech on Sir Wilfrid Lawson's local option resolu- tion. I have nothing now to add to it, and nothing to change. I adhere entirely without modification to what I then stated on behalf of the Government. We desire that the local authority should have complete control over the drink traffic ; that the locality should determine what houses should be licensed ; whether any, or none at all, or how many ; when they should be opened or closed, etc. ; in point of fact, that the locality should have complete and absolute authority to treat this as a local question, and not one as it has hitherto been regulated in every place by a fixed statute, which seems to me not appropriate to a question of this kind. We regard it as a question affecting the general welfare of a particular community like any- thing affecting its health, or morals, or those other matters which are now- confided to its local authority. . . . l^obody is more anxious than I am, or more willing, to go far in the direction of restraining the evils of the drink traffic — as far as possible." In Sir Wilfrid Lawson's resolution there is no mention Tiie queption of the much-agitated question of compensation * to the saih^rTtcTtiie publicans, t publicans. No doubt this point is a most delicate one, and difficult of solution ; but it must be solved in some way. Many arguments tell against material compensation, but there are arguments of weight both as to expediency, honesty, and justice, which indicate that the publicans should receive some consideration in this matter. Their privileges have been recognized for hundreds of years, during at least the earlier part of which time it was not known that any evil * See Appendix on compensation. f " It is only with the growth of democracy that here also we are slowly approaching a time when the rights of property will be frankly subordinated to the rights of humanity and the good of tbe body politic. At present such doctrine is ' unsound,' for in a society still essentially plutocratic we recognize — though it is not considered seemly so to express it — that a man may have a vested interest in poisoning his neighbours, and must not be prevented from doing so except upon adequate comjDensation." — Pall Mall Gazette, April 10, 1884. 348 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. The publi- cans' side of the question. The public's side (if the question. inhered in drink itself, but only in its immoderate use. Throng-h ignorance, the liquor trade occupied a moral plane from Avhicli science has since overthrown it. The fact that this ignorance is removed, that alcohol is at last known to be rank poison, though it changes vitally and fatally the moral position of those who sell it as a common beverage, does not therefore absolve society from all duty of consideration for the liquor-dealers ; nor is it likely to prevent liquor-dealers — with whom long habitude has also done its work, and in the continuance of whose "time-honoured privileges," as they not untruly call them, the homes and livelihood of hundreds and thousands of persons are bound up — from mustering all their forces to avert the legal ruin which abrupt or rapid prohibition, with- out some reasonable pecuniary or other compensation, would be to them. It may be that the character of a trade is not always necessarily germane to the question of its right to existence, especially if its very foundation was laid in legal recognition and State protection. If in ignorance of the fact and effects of contagion, we had legalized a business in which men were authorized and licensed to vend disease- infected garments, we could not, later on — when we had become wiser — with justice, summarily deprive them of the livelihood grounded in their and our ignorance, without paying' due consideration to the conditions and necessities which the change would involve for them. On the other hand, it can be urged that if liquor- dealers are entitled to compensation for loss of livelihood, why not all those who are necessarily affected by the down- fall of the liquor trade ? Why not the pawnbrokei's, money-lenders, gamblers, police, physicians, lawyers, jailors, and hangmen ? Again, it is a truth that liquor-dealers as a body mostly deal in adulterated or even wholly spurious wares,* * A point illustrated — if illustration is needed — by the way in which some evidently honest liquor-dealers reproach their adulterat- ing bi'ethren; possibly in some instances from really disinterested motives, but in most cases undoabtedly to check the spread of adulte- ration, because in the proportion of its spread it puts the burden of State duties on the few who do not adulterate. Liquor-dealers do not pay license taxes for the use of water, therefore in the measure that tiiey adulterate with water do they sell less liquor, and in the measure that they sell less liquor do they have less to pay to the State ; and WHAT CAX BE DONE ? 349 and therefore forfeit, by fraud, their claims to compensa- tion. And still State and society, knowing this as they have known and do know it, and not having taken effective measures to prevent and punish adulteration, have been almost the same as silent partners in the transaction, and have thereby lost much of that moral force which would otherwise have entitled them to act more strictly with the liquor-dealers in case of prohibition.* Personally, I lean in the direction of those who think publicans are entitled not exactly to compensation, but certainly to consideration. A hint to licensed victuallers of a way by which they a hint to might gradually make themselves and their houses ready victuallers for prohibition, and at the same time increase their claims pare them-' to consideration when such change should arrive, was selves and thrown out by the Lord Mayor of York, at the annual fort'he''''''' dinner of the York Licensed Victuallers' Association, inevitable. February 8, 1881. The Lord Mayor said that there -was now a greater use of non-alcoholic drinks, and he thought it would be wise on the part of those who held licences to encourage their sale. It seemed to him that if the licensed victuallers could pu.t themselves more in harmony with the feeling in favour of the increased sobriety and for the con- sumption of non-alcoholic drinks, they would further their own interests in various ways, besides promoting public sobriety. Some licensed victuallers are acting upon this advice, and furnish tea and coffee besides alcoholic drinks,t and thus many a liquor-dealer with a roaring trade pays less to the State than some who have a comparatively small custom ; hence the cry of the non-adulterating liquor-dealers against the dishonest practice of adulteration. * Alliance Xeics, February 19, 18S1. f "Now, if this Church of England Temperance Society would bring about a revolution among the publicans and licensed victuallers of this country, and if my colleagues and my friends (I am not ashamed to call them friends) would allow one of their own set to advise them to look to their own gains and to turn their houses — those committee-rooms that they used to have, and which will be no longer of use to them if this Bill passes in the House of Commons for prohibiting the use of committee-rooms in public-houses — instead of having those committee-rooms let once in every seven years ; why not have wholesome refreshments where the best of everything can be got ? and don't you think that the publicans and great brewers of 350 THE FOUNDATIOX OF DEATH. ib seems fullj probable that the liquor-dealers might gradually become almost wholly dealers in non-alcoholic drinks. Scheme for In this direction also the State might greatly assist to the°confli'cN promote the welfare of the people, by a scheme having due ing interests re^fard to all three of the chief considerations — the health probibitiyu and morality of the population, the necessities of the rl''u-d"o exchequer, and the future of the publican, health. Many persons, who, convinced of the evil of drink and ™venu^'^'"^ desiring to abstain, have yet lacked strength to at once break off their drinking habits, have tried and found suc- cessful the simple plan of daily slightly diluting their regular portion of whiskey, wine, or beer with, water, until the rejection of a drink, thus gradually made insipid and uninviting, for pure water, becomes easy and at last natural. Now, it is in the power of the State, the people consent- this conntry having the means of providing good food and good tea and coffee at more moderate rates than tliose who have got to pay rent for their houses, do not you tliink their profits would be larger ? Coffee taverns, I think, are admirable institutions with the exception that they do not sell coffee. (Hear, hear.) Anything more abomin- able or more filthy than what is supposed to be sold for 2d. a cup in coffee-palaces is not to be imagined, and at the very commencement of this splendid movement already we must bring in a Reform Bill." — Sir P. C. Owen's speech, E.^eter Hall, April 25, 1883, as reported in Church of England Temperance Chronicle, May 5, 1883. At a meeting of the Exeter Conservative Association, held in Exeter on the 26th of February, 1884, Mr. J. P. Heath read aa address on the Temperance Question, in which he said : — " It must not be thought that licensed victuallers liked to see drunkards on their premises, for such men were the greatest nuisances they had to contend with, as they drove other customers away, and placed the landlord under a penalty for supplying them with liquor if they were in a state of intoxication, and he might forfeit his licence thereby. . . . Neither must it be thouglit that inn- keepers derived greater advantages from selling alcoholic than non- alcoholic beverages, for he knew that more profit was made over the sale of a bottle of soda-water than a glass of grog, and over the sale of ginger beer than brewers' beer made from malt and hops. Brewers were finding out that, and were turning their attention in many instances to the manufacture of aerated waters, and through the spread of temperance principles by persuasion and conversion any licensed victualler would admit that his sale of temperance drinks had largely increased of late years, and that he was equally willing to provide accommodation for teetotalers who wished to use his premises for the transaction of their business as for non. abstainers." WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 351 ing, to try a similar experiment of drink-cure for tbe nation, by adopting an annually rising scale of license duties, the price per glass of every kind of alcoholic drink being definitely and permanently fixed by law ; the use of all ingredients in drink save alcohol and water being punished absolutely with imprisonment and loss of license, whenever detected ; and detection, by whomsoever made, to be always compensated by a fixed premium. Gradually as the license duty increased, the liquor-dealer would seek his compensation in increased water dilution, the public would gradually become accustomed to weaker liquids, and would finally reach the point where the gi-owing bodily and mental health, and the insipidity of the drinks would breed disgust. If, while this weaning process was going on, the liquor-dealers kept good coffee, tea, cocoa, chocolate, etc., their trade would gradually become established as that of licensed victuallers really, instead of licensed poisoners, and they could sell all the various non-alcoholic drinks, and thus, properly speaking, suffer no real loss. Meanwhile it would be the duty of the State to furnish pure sparkling water to the public, and to the publicans might be given the first chance of investment in securing this inestimable boon. § 84. When prohibition becomes law, there is one point The para- which the temperance advocates should not lose sight of, ™°^e**^"'^ namely, the exportation of liquor. The influence England Government has exercised in this respect on her colonies and those exportatkin savage nations forced by her fleets to trade with her, has ofnquor.and put an immense responsibility on her shoulders.* in case of ^ internal * " I am sorry to say that since the cession to the British Govern- prohibition, ment the Griquas have become a debased people, as much as before they were respected. The first thing that the Government did after the cession was to license a liquor-shop at Griqna Town and at other places within the territory, and from that I trace the debasement of the tribe. In order to show you the change that has taken place for the worse, I may mention that prior to the cession I travelled for fourteen years through a great part of the country, and I never saw a drunken native. It was, in fact, against the laws of the country to introduce brandy or other spirituous liquors ; but immediately after the cession and the licensing of drinking the state of things un- fortunately changed. At the time to which I have referred the Griquas had a couucil and a court of justice, in which a regular record of the proceedings was kept ; punishments were awarded for offences according to civilized ideas, and the country was remarkably free 352 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. QnotinfT from the Gazette of India (August 25, 1883), the Alliance Neios of December 8, 1883, says, "A compara- from crime." — lion. David Arnot, in Manchester Courier, March 13, 1879. " Griqualand was annexed to the British Crown in 1871, and with it a large tract of Bechnana territory. Up to that time, the chiefs, Waterboer and Yanke (the former Griqua and the latter Bechnana), had prohibited, as lar as possible, the sale of brandy in their respec- tive territories. So soon as the country was annexed, canteens were licensed and opened all over the country, and the people, who had become more or less civilized and Christianized, began to go back again. They took to drinking, and began to lose all they possessed. This became so bad in Griqualand that, in 1877, the heads of the Griqua tribe drew up a petition in the Dutch language for presenta- tion to Her Majesty the Queen, imploring her to stop the sale of drink, as it was brinoring them to rnin. — Eev. A. J. Unkey, Bedford, August 14, toWm. Hoyle. Appeared in Alliance News, September 27, 1879. The Friewl for April contains a letter from the Nonconformist and Independent, from a missionary of the London Missionary Society, con- cerning the Bechuanas, tlie people among whom Dr. Moffat so long laboured. The writer, A. J. Wookey, says : — " Magistrates were appointed to various districts to represent British authority amongst the natives at a distance from Kimberlcy, which was the seat of government and the great centre of European population. Gaols were built and police enrolled. At the same time canteens were licensed and opened in every available place for the sale of Cape brandy. Licensed hawkers, travelling in waggons, carried the same pernicious wares to all the native villages and hamlets, bringing dis- turbance and misery wherever they came. They would even cross the border, and, in defiance of the chiefs, carry on the sale in front of their very doors. And if a chief attempted to interfere, he would be threatened with the soldiers and police. One of the saddest sights to be seen there any day was that of natives riding backwards and forwards to these places on horseback or oxback, infuriated by drink, or to see men and women rolling about or lying hopelessl}'' intoxicated under the shadow of the staff bearing aloft the British flag. This was the licensed process of civilization, under the patronage of the British Government — the brandy shop, the magistrate's court, and the gaol. The effect of this state of things, especially in these outlying districts, was appalling, and many of the natives became more debased and impoverished than ever they had been as heathen. Up to this time the native chiefs had prohibited the sale of these drinks in their country, well knowing the evils they brought. But the Government deliberately broke down the feeble barriers, and flooded the country with ruin. At Griqua Town the chief became the prey of the canteen- keepers and others, and turned out a besotted imbecile ; and many of his people are very little better. In 1877 a number of the chief native inhabitants of Gi-iqua Town drew up a petition addressed to Her WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 853 tive statement of the import revenue for the four months of the official year and of the twelve preceding years, published in the Gazette of India of the 25th of August, shows how far the imports of liquor are on the increase. The average of the four months (April to 31st July) for the ten years commencing Jrom 1871-72 shows the follow- ing results, as compared with the revenue collected within three succeeding years : — Eevenue — Apeil to July. Average 10 vears up to 1880. 1881. 1882. 1883. Bengal .. . Es. 4,16,000 4,66,000 4,93,000 4,84,000 Bombay .. . „ 2,30,000 3,56,000 3,61,000 3,66,000 Madras . . . „ 1,57,000 1,76,000 1,79,000 1,76,000 Burmah .. . „ 1,56,000 2,34,000 2,98,000 2,83,000 " What do these figures indicate ? That in Bengal the average increase during the last three years, compared with that of the ten years preceding, is 16 per cent., in Majesty Qneen Victoria, imploring her to stay the ruin coming upon them, and stop the sale of drink. This petition reached the Colonial OiEce in November, 1877, but no notice was taken of it further than an acknowledgment to the forwarder. Had the wrongs of these poor people been inquired into at the time, it is probable that much misery and bloodshed might have been averted ; but the cry of the helpless was disregarded." — Alliance News, April 17, 1880. The Temperance Record for Jnly 24, 1883, quotes Mr. McKay, the Missionary of the American Board from Lake Victoria Nyanza, as saj'ing : — " Go where j-ou will — Usequha, Usagara, Ugogo, Ungam- wezi, Usukuma, Ukerewe, or Uganda — you will find every week, and, when grain is plentiful, every night, every man, woman, and child, even to the sucking infant, reeling with the effects of alcohol. On this account, chiefly, I became a teetotaler on leaving the coast, and have continued so ever since. I believe, also, that abstinence is the true secret of continued and unimpaired health in the tropics. Who wishes to introduce civilization into Africa ? Let a sine qua, non of the enterprise be that its members be total abstainers. The West Coast is ruined with rum ; it is killing the Kaflar in the South ; and even at the East Coast, at Zanzibar, a vile liquor is distilled from the sugar canes at Kokotoni, that is retailed by every Hindu, Banyan, and Goa merchant in all the coast towns, to the destruction of the Suaheli race. Matama or pinicum is the general malt, but, failing that, Indian corn and a small millet called mewere are called into requisition, the strength being often increased by the addition of honey. On the shores of Kyanza, plaintains are plentiful, and from them a wine is made which causes king and people to meet on the low level of intoxication." 2 A THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Mr. Robert Rae on this point. Bombay 56 per cent., in Madras 13, and in Burmali 74 ! This increase is most significant. It is full 36 per cent, for the -whole of British India, or at the rate of 12 per cent, per annum. Is such a progress in the revenue deriv^ed from spirits no cause for apprehension ? " In his speech in St. James's Hall (May 19, 1870) the Hindoo reformer. Baboo Keshub Chunder Sen, bitterly complained of the curse the English liquor traific had been to India. " The whole atmosphei'e of India," said he, " seems to be rending with cries of thousands of poor helpless widows, who curse the British Government for having introduced that thing." In the retrospect for 1882, in the Temperance League Annual, Mr. Robert Rae, the secretary of the League, says, " The influecne which the English nation exerts on the social customs of the colonies is very great, and in the matter of our drinking habits, incalculable harm has been done to many of our dependencies. Temperance reformers, recognizing this, are bound to do all in their power to prevent other communities from being saddled with an evil which they themselves are endeavouring to get rid of." He then speaks of the audience granted to the National Temperance League by Cetewayo, of his cordial sympathy with its views, and his assurances that he had issued a proclamation against the introduction of spirits, which he would, renew on his restoration. " Tour spirits and in- Itranceswith toxicants are death," said the king, " but it is no good England. shutting the door on my side, for I have no distilleries. I think the proper way would be for the Natal Government to assist me by placing restrictions upon the introduction of spirituous liquors in my country.* Cetewayo's * The Alliance News (October 4, 1879) quotes the following from the Birmingham Daily Mail : — "It has been discovered that Cetewayo has most advanced notions on the subject of the liquor traffic. He strictly prohibits the sale of Cape rum and other spirits in his country, and a curious story appears in a contemporary to-day, showing how this law was promulgated. A well-known trader, some time within the last four years, on a visit to Uluiidi, surreptitiously introduced a quantity of liquor ; and a native, a relapsed missionary convert, who was working for the king, got outrageously drunk thereon, and meet- ing the king abused him to his face, calling him every bad name in the Zulu vocabulary. Instead of the king wreaking his vengeance WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 355 How needful strict laws against liquor exportation The liquor would be if prohibition measures were passed, is fore- silmand"^'^ shadowed by the two notable liquor treaties concluded Madagascar during the last session : the first one with Siam,* in April ' (1883), providing the importation of all kinds of spirits, beers, and wines by British subjects on the same conditions as those exacted of Siamese subjects ; and the second with the government of Madagascar,t May 25th. Both treaties leaving Siam and Madagascar bound literally hand and foot to the liquor-traders in England and the British subjects (a term specially and broadly defined) in both these countries. Commenting on the treaty with Siam, the Daily News says, " Much of the alcoholic liquor which summarily npon the inebriated fool, he waited until the next day, when the man was sober, and then accepted his apology, at the same time expressing an opinion that they who supplied the drink were more to blame than he was. A law was, however, thereufDon made by Cetewayo wholly prohibiting the sale of spirits. * The treaty with Siam has encouraged Holland, where the number of public-houses is limited by law, to follow the example of Great Britain, and force npon Siam a liquor treaty identical with the one concluded by Great Britain. t Says fhe Alliance News (September 13, 1879), "The effects of rum on the native inhabitants of Madagascar are so pernicious, lead- ing to commission of fearful crimes when under its influence, that a number of Consuls, missionaries, and other influential residents of Madagascar, have addressed a memorial to Queen Eanavalona, asking that its importation into her kingdom may be prohibited absolutely. The memorial and the reply sent by the Queen's Chief Minister are in La tientinelle de Maurice of Aprd 28, and from the reply we give the following translation, showing that the Queen is quite alive to the necessity for restricting the sale of the spirit among her subjects,: — - " ' The Queen has directed me to thank you for the desire which you express that she will not permit rum to enter her kingdom in such quantity as to allow the people to drink of it to excess. That God may bless your good idea is the earnest wish of the Queen. As for myself, I have attentively considered your statements, and they have afforded me much pleasure, and I take the liberty of thanking you, for I see by them how great is the interest which you take in the Malagasi nation. I have the honour to tell you, gentlemen, that already a law has been framed which prohibits the drinking of rum in the kingdom of Madagascar. In your letter you have shown the effects of rum-drinking in all its hideousness, and above all how it brutalizes men. You are right; and the Queen thanks you for your thoughtfalness, which has been inspired by your friendship, and for the great good of her people.' " tioQ THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. finds its way into countries in tlie position of Siam, is little better than poison, and ought to be so labelled." As to Madagascar, it is but eight years since the press of England rung with praises of the Madagascan Queen for her liquor prohibition proclamation (1876). England's responsibility for the moral and social con- dition of affairs in Madagascar is indicated in the following query and answer in the House of Commons debate, April 19, 1883 :— " Mr. Buxton asked the Under-Secretary for Foreign Affairs whether it was a fact that Tamatave, the px'incipal port of Madagascar, was supplied to an enormous extent with inferior and poisonous rum from Mauritius, for which no other market could be found ; whether it had been the cause of general and disgusting intoxication throughout the town and neighbourhood ; whether the Hova Govern- ment formerly imposed a duty of thirty-three per cent, on the importation, and was only compelled by English and other consular pressure to reduce such duty to ten per cent. ? . . . " Lord E. Fitzmaurice : ' 1 regret to say that it is a fact that a large quantity of inferior rum is imported into Madagascar from Mauritius, and it has, no doubt, been the cause of the evils to which my honourable friend refers.' If drink should be prohibited in England, and the exportation at the same time not prevented, such treaties as these (passed in order to make up for those £5,000,000 less of revenue * so much rejoiced over by the Chancellor of the Exchequer, in the last budget ?) are significant of how further internal deficits might be made up. * The causes of this deficit were well pointed out by the Eight Honourable Balfour, Lord Advocate of Scotland. "The weightiest utterance on the liquor traffic in Scotland came from the highest Scottish Parliamentary official, the Right Honoui'able Lord Advocate Balfour. We read with much pleasure all that his lordship so elo- quently said with regard to the progress made by the temperance reformation, especially in Parliament, and we commend his lordship's testimony to those who would fain believe that the temperance re- formers are unable to move on. Of the £5,000,000 which is lost to the revenue, a large share of ci'cdit is justly due to the prohibitionists. The Cameron Act of 1876, the Irish Sunday Closing Act of 1878, and the Steamboat Passengers Sunday Act of 1880 have been eminently helpful in that beneficial reduction." — The Social Reformer, February, 1884. WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 857 § 85. Morewood, in liis Inebriating Liquors (1838), National quotes the following pregnant saying of Plajfair : — under Uie " When a nation becomes the slave of its revenue, and liquor sacrifices everything thereto, abuses that favour revenue ''^^*'^"*^- are difficult to reform." And liquor legislation in England to this day has proved the truth of this statement. For some thi-ee hundred years it has been the case that in the measure revenue has been needed, English Governments have almost invariably encouraged distillation and increased the facilities for the consumption of liquor. As early as 1552 the first Licensing Act was passed : — Brief sum- " An acte for keepers of ale-houses to be bound in recog- hlstm-y of'* nizances, and giving the justices power to close ale-houses licensing. in such town or towns as they shall think meet and convenient." In 1553 a law was passed providing that no town should be granted more than two wine licences, excepting 22 ; among these last, London was allowed 40, York 8, Bristol 6, and the others 4 and 3. But neither Liverpool, Manchester, Birmingham, Sheffield, nor Leeds were included among these exceptions. During James I.'s reign (1603) licence was granted by letters patent. In 1643 the Long Parliament laid a tax on heer and ale for the ensuing year, calling it by the new name excise, pro- bably an anglicizing of the Belgian acciisse, signifying tribute. In 1753 an act was passed for the more easy conviction of persons selling ale and strong liquors without licence. In 1828 the liquor-dealers got permission to appeal to the quarter sessions from decisions by justices of peace. In 1830 the pernicious Beer Act was passed, to rival the public-house, it was claimed. In 1860 the Refreshment Houses and Wine Licences Act was passed, " to facilitate the sale and consumption of light foreign wines in con- fectioners' shops and eating-houses." February 10, 1860, Mr. Gladstone made a proposition for reducing the The Grocers' duty on brandy from fifteen shillings per gallon to eight Licence Act. shillings and twopence — the colonial duty ; and although this effort failed, he succeeded in 1861 in passing the Grocers' Licence Act. The harm that Act has done is incalculable. Already i58 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. The Satur- day Review on the Grocers' Ivicence Act, in reRard to its effect in the drawiug- room. in the Evidence on Drunhenness before the House of Commons, 1834, it was shown that Grocers' Licences did great harm. The Saturday Review (January 21, 1871), in an article on Vraiving-room Alcoholization, says in regard to the results from these licences — " If the Lancet laments, as it has done, the over-prescrip- tion of stimulants which was ' too much in fashion a few years ago,' its acknowledgment of the perhaps irreparable evil is unseen by the general reader. The literature of temperance societies and police reports does not affect the divinities of our Olympus, who hardly guess the striking resemblance between their nectar and the gin of the ' masses.' . . . The rich escape the publicity of their practices which befals our poor, and consequently we cannot so well guess at the causes of that failure in duty at home, and in discretion abroad, which appears to be on the increase ; but there is reason to believe that the frequent ' pick-me-up,' the mid-day and afternoon sherry or cham- pagne, may have much to do with the pace at which young men and maidens, old men and children, Mayfair mothers and Belgravian beauties, are posting downhill. . . . In- dulgence in any vice always entails others, but the distinct effect of alcohol is so to affect the nerves and brain that the material power to resist any temptation is lessened in proportion to the quantity taken. This is hardly, then, a safe stimulant for women, nor will it, even in small quan- tities, advantageously develop their peculiarities. . . . Supposing the lady of the house never exceeds the sherry she can carry with dignity and self-approval, and get decently through her daily round of deadly-lively occupa- tion, she remains a proof that a woman with a taste for strong liquors has seldom any other taste. Her maid puts on her clothes, but she is careless of her appearance, and even liable to personal unkemptness. She is often un- punctual, fractious before her dram, and dull afterwards. She does not cultivate friends or acquaintances who could be any check to her practices. She likes her mankind to be much away from the house, and if they take no notice of the quantity of wine consumed in their establishment she will be affectionate, if rather stupid, to them. Of what is pure and noble in life she loses appreciation, while all WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 359 that is animal is intensified in her. If she has children, they will probably suffer from constitutional depression and weakness, and ' tone ' will be plentifully supplied by port wine, and even bi-andy, from their infancy up. With the career of the boys we are not here concerned, but of the girls what may or may not be prophesied ? If they have escaped positive disease by the time they are launched in the world, they will be, at all events, dependent for their ' go' in society on copious champagne and frequent sherry. Naturally they will join the increasing mob of fast girls, with all that is involved in that evil. We are sensible of a distinct moral relaxation among women, and of a new sort of unwomanly recklessness in the presence of men. We complain of a prevalent coarseness even among the virtuous, not only of manner, but of imagination and pur- suits, and we are sometimes tempted to prefer the age of Nell Gwynne or Madame de Pompadour to the actual con- fusion of daredevil women and unabashed spinsters. It would seem that alcohol has something to do with this disorder, for the physical effects of it on women are proved by medical investigation to be precisely what w^ould denaturalize them." Commenting on this article Dr. Anstie, in a paper on The Prac- The Use and Abuse of Alcohol hy Women, in the Practitioner onThe same. (March, 1871), says — " The fact is, that all tipplers become more or less untruthful, but that female tipplers invariably become shameless and most skilful liars. And the favourite lie which they invent as an excuse for theii" habits is an apocryphal medical order ' to take plenty of support and stimulants.' We have personally detected the manufac- ture and skilful dissemination of this particular falsehood in several instances, and the practice is notorious to physicians who see much of nervous diseases." And the >Spec^afor (February 18, 1871) says, in an article The on Women and AlcoJwl— on woX " It is ruin for them, as it is for men, and in both cases andaicouoi. for the same reason, because any narcotizing poison, once in possession of the system, paralyzes the will ; but it is ruin far quicker, and, owing to the organization of society, more complete. We are not inclined to believe what the Saturday says and the Practitioner hints, that liquor impairs 3G0 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. chastity in women more than in men ; but women depend upon the will, which the influence of the poison cripples, and suffer more visibly when its paralysis has thrown them back defenceless upon impulse, whether the impulse be kleptomania or concession to solicitations." Protests Mrs. Dawson Burns, ^I'itiug in the Alliance Neics, prfssalalnst January 4, 1879, says :-_ the Grocers' "The motive prompting these Acts was good; it was The Alliance avowedly to draw away the public-house and beershop News. votaries. Statistics signally show a failure in that object ; going still farther, they unfortunately prove that, rather than lessening the one evil, these Acts open up channels for a different class of women obtaining drink who would rarely, on account of their social status, have ventured into either a public-house or beershop. " These licences, though not restricted to, are chiefly granted to grocers, confectioners, the keepers of refresh- ment bars, and restaurants ; and through such facilities the mischief is extended to a section of our female popula- tion Avho largely avail themselves of these means — women who, by reason of their educational attainments and position, exercise a wider influence than others. " These Acts have led to two results : First, the well- known habit of ladies, even young ladies, in their ordinary walks and shopping, entering these more respectable refreshment places, and partaking of stimulants Ijetween the hours of meals. Second, the inducement they have given to secret drinking by ladies in their own houses." The same article quotes the following from the Lancet's protest against the continuance of this Act, which protest was signed by 920 physicians, surgeons, and medical practitioners : — " We, the undersigned, being members of the medical profession, beg to i-ecord our strong persuasion that the facilities for obtaining spirits, wines, stout, and ale, in bottles, which are provided by the ' Grocers' Licence,' have a most injurious tendency. We believe that women, servants, and children of respectable households, who could not, or would not, procure intoxicating drinks at public- houses, are encouraged to purchase and use these liquors by the opportunity offered when visiting the grocers' shops for other purjioses. Female domestic servants are often WHAT CAX BE DONE ? 30 1 enabled to obtain bottles of spirits, wine, and beer at a small cost on credit, or as ' commission ' on the household bills. This trade is wholly removed from police super- vision, and it is a direct incentive to secret drinking, a practice more injurious to the health and moral and social prosperity of the community than the ordinary trade in intoxicating liquors as carried on by the licensed victuallers. We protest against the continuance of this licence on grounds moral and medical ; and we urge its consideration by a ' Select Committee of the House of Peers ' now in- vestigating the subject of intemperance, and the measures expedient to reduce the evils of excess. The abolition of this special licence we hold to be the first, and perhaps the most practical, step within the province of the Legislature." In the Lords Committee on Intemperance, 1879, abundant proofs were given that the grocers' licences were a most prolific cause of increased di'unkenness among women. Early in the present year (1883) the Lancet says : — iht Lancet " When, some years ago, we made an energetic bat, as it unhappily proved, a vain endeavour to influence public opinion in favour of the total abolition of grocers' licences to sell spirits and wines in bottles, we pointed out how women obtained intoxicating beverages under cover of ' groceries,' and how grocers not uncommonly gave Christmas presents to customers and their servants in the shape of bottles of brandy, whisky, or wine. At a recent inquest on the body of an old woman, who was found dead in her bed after a drinking bout, it was stated that a bottle of whisky, which had been presented by the grocer, was found under the bed-clothes nearly empty, but still clutched by the poor victim of this false kindness, although the hand with which she seemed to grasp it was dead. This is only an incident, but it will serve to show how this most mischievous licence tells against public and social prosperity . . . Probably, hereafter, when much dire and irreparable mischief has been wrought, it will be seen that this State facility for the secret pursuit of vice, ' the grocers' licence,' ought to be abolished." And a little later, the Lancet adds : — '• The demoralization of women by these most senseless and mischievous licences is an e\i\ we have deplored, and 362 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. The attitude of the Church of Kngliind 'J'emperance Society. Canon Leigh's advice to the M'^ omen's Union to boycott liquor-sell- ing grocers. The Temper- ance Record on the in- creasing in- temperance among women as being largely due to the Grocers' Licence Act.' which would long since have found a suflBcient remedy but that the great landlords of London and elsewhere would find their personal interests affected by the passing of any law putting an end to the social plague of the grocers' licence. Unfortunately, these landlords occupy positions of influence in the Legislature, and therefore the evil cannot be wholly remedied. The attitude of the Church of England Temperance Society on this most important matter has been noble. Its Women's Union addressed letters inquiring into the actual facts as to the evils wrought by these licences, to " clergy- men, medical men, coroners, and others." The responses to these inquiries, published in pamphlet form early in 1883, fully substantiate by various and conclusive evidence the fact that the grocers' licences have carried, and are carrying, the evil of drink among women to an alarming extent, and particularly increasing it among a class of women who would not think of resorting to the public- house. In the Church of England Temjierance Chronicle (May 12, 1883), I find the following quoted from the speech of Canon Leigh, delivered in Exeter Hall (April 26) : — " I would wish to draw attention, as it has been drawn over and over again, to the dreadful system of grocers' licences, which I am qu.ite certain is contributing more than anything else to the increase of drinking amongst women. I should strongly urge iipon all the members of the Women's Union never to deal with grocers who trade in spirituous liquors, and to advise their friends not to do so either." Of the steadily increasing intemperance among women, the Temperance liecord (November 15, 1883) says : — • " It is one of the most discouraging features of our time. Recent judicial statistics clearly show not only that there is a greater proportionate increase of drunkenness amongst women, but that in their case the habit is more inveterate than in men. In the Judicial Statistics for 1882, I'ecently published, it is stated that the offenders who have been convicted for any crime above ten times are 4391 males, and 8946 females, or 8"9 and 29'3 per cent, respectively on the total commitments. In other words, more than a quarter of all women in prison, whose offence WHAT CAX BE DONE ? 363 is not the first, have been in over ten times. A comparison of five years will show how women have been steadily getting worse in this respect : — 1878, 5673 females ; 1879, 6800 females; 1880, 6773 females; 1881, 7946 females; 1882, 8946 females. This preponderance of women, according to the competent testimony of the Rev. J. W. Horsley, is almost entirely due to the special character, and the increase, of female intemperance. . . . One cause against which the Lancet has nobly protested is what is familiarly known as the Grocers' Licences Act. The repeal of that Act, we feel persuaded, would put a decided check upon the increase of female intemperance, and should be urgently pressed upon the Legislature by all classes of social reformers." The following picture is taken from the chapter on Mr. Georcre " The Secret Sin," in the Social Kaleidoscope by George R. the social Sims. Drawn by a pen to which the world is deeply effects of the indebted for a circumstantial knowledge of the drink-evil licences. in its connection with poverty, and for striking practical suggestions as to remedies and reforms, its details are vouched for from personal observations. " The pen almost hesitates brutally to describe a high- bred, lovely woman by the word ' drunkard.' It seems as if such an appellation could give rise in the mind of the reader only to vicious, coarse, degraded womanhood. It is, alas ! a revelation of these later days of modern civilization that intemperance is almost as prevalent among the higher ranks of female society as it is among the very lowest. There is, however, this difference. Sally Giles, of Lant Street, Borough, gets drunk in the public-house and rolls about the streets ; Lady Clara Sangazur drinks in her boudoir, and dozes off her ' bad headache ' in the quietude of her bedchamber. We know through the police reports, and we see with our eyes, the havoc which drink is making among the low^er orders ; its ravages in the upper classes of society are known only to the doctor and the friends of the family, save when every now and then an aristocratic divorce case reveals the fact that the lady was ' in- temperate.' Seeing it not, good folks are inclined to doubt its existence. Alas ! it is the great social evil of the day ; and until it is thoroughly exposed, the means taken to stamp it out must necessarily be insufficient. Look at 364 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Mabel ISTortb, this fair young creature, the picture of health and pleasure. Who among the admiring crowd about would suspect that she is a dram-drinker, a woman who gets helplessly drunk whenever she has the chance, and who will pour ardent spirits down her throat like water ? No one. But I, knowing the bistory of her case, deem it my duty to drag her before the world in her real character and lay bare the canker-worm in this lovely flower. I will write no word of lier that is not true. I have seen her within the last twelve hours, and I am yet trembling at what I saw. But, lest I should be accused of endeavouring to work up a sensational story out of au every-day cata- strophe, let me give you the details of her case in the ordinary matter-of-fact Avay. " Mr. North looks anxiously at his wife in the refresh- ment-room this evening, and sighs, because she has for three days kept her promise to him that she would not touch drink of any sort. Yielding to her earnest solicita- tions, he has brought her to the ball, though he would rather for the present she had avoided the excitement. And now, flushed with the dancing and pleased with the admiration her beauty has aroused, she has resented his anxious and meaning glance, and has accepted iced cham- pagne from the hand of her partner. Later on she returns again for sherry. At supper she has more champagne. After supper she goes again into the refreshinent-room and has an ice. She eats half the ice, and feels faint. In the ladies' dressing-rooin she knows she will find what she requires, and thither she repairs. ' I feel faint,' she says to the maid. The maid smiles, and produces the brandy- bottle. She is used to her business, and she knows what the lady of to-day takes for faintness. You who would ape the manners and customs of modern fashion, mind that you put a plentiful supply of brandy and gin in the ladies' dressing-rooms — they look for it. You might as well have no ices in the refreshment-room as no spirits in this apartment. Presently North peremptorily bids his wife put on her cloak and come ; he sees the warning look in her eyes, and the nervous dread that some one else will notice it comes upon him at once. She obeys, and they drive home. In the carriage he remonstrates with her. She is sleepy and sullen, and makes no reply. Only she WHAT CAN BE DONE ? feels the sense of tliirst growing upon her, and when she gets home she will drag another bottle of brandy from its hiding-place in her maid's I'oom and empty it. "The next day Mabel North's husband is the picture of despair. Incensed at her open defiance of her plighted word, he has taken her somewhat harshly to task, and dared her to drink any more spirits. He has commanded her to be temperate, as if that were any use. She defies him openly. The spirit has done its work, and she laughs foolishly, and tells him he may lock the cellar and do what he likes, but she will get it still. He fancies he can be clever enough to keep drink from her if he tries. He locks up all the wine and spirits. She sends her servants to the public-house. He finds it out, and threatens them with dismissal if they repeat the offence. She goes out and gets it herself, brings it in from the grocer's in the carriage, and carries it upstairs under her cloak. For six ■weeks she is in a semi-maudlin state of intoxication, and his every effort to stop the supply is defeated. In despair he takes away her money, and refuses to give her any. He will pay all bills himself. The first result of this arrangement is a discovery that there are five times as many pounds of tea charged in the grocer's bill as could possibly have been consumed. He makes inquiries, and finds that tea in a grocer's bill means spirits ; that it is supplied to the lady of the house in this manner, and is called tea to deceive those it may be necessary to deceive. Challenged, the grocer defends himself. He states that it is the custom of the trade to supply ladies with spirits and charge them as tea and sugar and sauce. It is the large secret consumption of spirits by well-to-do women that renders the grocers' licences so valuable. Ladies cannot buy at the public-house ; to draw heavily on the cellar would alarm the husband ; but an unlimited quantity can be sent into the house quietly by the grocer, and charged as tea or some other article of daily household consumption. I have not the slightest doubt that the growth of secret drinking among ladies is largely contributed to by the system of grocers' licences. ... To watch the woman he loves becoming gradually dead to fine feeling, dead to social etiquette, and at last dead even to decency, is the lot of 36G THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. more men at the present moment than the world di'eams of. The secret is hideous, and is sacredly kept as long as possible. . . . " Mr. North made another despairing effort to rescue his -wife. He set a watch upon her, aad kept her entirely without money. At first, unable to obtain alcohol, she drank scent ; but the cunning bred of dipsomania suggested to her a means of obtaining both money and brandy." She opened his correspondence, abstracted all sums it chanced to enclose, and hid or destroyed all letters which asked him for the return of sums she had borrowed. On discovering this, her husband made inquiry in the neigh- bourhood, and found that she had borrowed money wherever she had upon any pretext found it possible to do so, and had even borrowed valuable articles from different shops and pawned them. He was forced to check these proceed- ings by advertisement, in order to escape ruin. This " seemed to break the last tie that restrained her. She borrowed small sums of the servants, pawned her jewellery, stole from her husband's pockets, resorted to every trick she could think of to get money, and every farthing went down her throat. " Her health now began to give way, and she grew violent. Once, when he seized her by the arm, she rushed at her husband and tore his face with her nails ; she cursed the servants if they interfered with her ; and the doctor who attended her roundly told her at last that if she did not alter, he would certify that she was mad and put her under restraint. For a time this threat had an effect, but the disease had advanced to a stage when it is rarely cured. In a week she had a relapse, and, managing by some means to get half a dozen of brandy into the house, she drank the lot in four days, and was mad drunk. Like a beautiful fiend, she tore about the room cursing and raving, and shrieking that she was pursued by devils. The servants, terrified by a sudden access of violence, called her husband, and he entered the room and ran towards her with a cry of horror. He had never seen her like this before — a foul-mouthed madwoman, tearing at the air, and threatening murder to any one who came near her. As he ran towards her to secure her she flung up her arms. . . . WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 367 " Slie met her death leaping from an open window to avoid her husband ; and the coroner's verdict, translated into plain English, says that her death was due to a drunken frenzy. I have glossed over this ghastly picture, merely suggesting the outlines of it. And yet, toned down as it is, there will be hundreds who will question its truth and say it is overdrawn. To such I would say, Who are the men most likely to know ? The medical pro- fession. Ask, then, any medical man whose practice lies among women of the better, middle, and upper classes, and he will tell you there is no doctor with any connection at all who has not half a dozen lady secret drinkers on his books. This secret drinking is a social cancer, and it is eating away all that is noblest and best in womanly nature. We have asylums for idiots and lunatics ; when are we to have an asylum for dipsomaniacs ? " When we remember that insanity is more prevalent and The most less curable proportionately among drinking women than reason"for among drinking men; that the children of the drinking tiie repeal of mother are more certainly victims of alcoholic heredity in licences. all its either fatal or most baneful and degrading forms, than are those of the drinking father ; — when we remember these things, then indeed does the necessity for the repeal of such an Act as the Grocers' Licences come home with overwhelming force. § 86. Besides these large measures, there are many Various minor legislative steps of more or less importance, both of fative^^^'^" preventive and restrictive character, which might be taken, measures. For example, it should no longer be left optional with Restriction licensing magistrates to renew licences to publicans who ofrene^i^g" are disreputable and strain or transgress the law. It ought licences. to be compulsory to have large and low windows to public- Low houses (as is the case on the continent), so that passers ^'^puYg^ory could see what was going on within. If it is a respectable for public- thing to frequent public-houses, why should the scenes within be concealed ? If it is disreputable, why should it have the encouragement of being specially screened, and the police be at the same time hindered in their duty of watching such places ? Publicans ought to be forbidden to employ women as 368 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Prohibition of the em- ployment of ■women as bar-tenders. Public con- veyances should neither bear the names of, nor have their stations at, public- houses. Canon Ellison on juvenile in- temperance in Liverpool and Man- chester. bar-tenders.* Among incitements to drink, especially in England, Denmark, and Sweden, are tke barmaids. Some of the prettiest girls in England are to be found behind the liquor bars, a fact illusti-ated bj the Annual Barmaid Shows. The Dani-sh town of Veile has recognized the presence of these girl bar-tenders, as a cause of intemper- ance, by imposing restrictions on public-house keepers, who are forbidden by the town authorities to employ servant- maids under the age of forty years ! If such a law as this could be passed and enforced in London, and other large centres, w^hat incalculable good would be the result as regards both drink and the social evil. It is well known that the women thus employed are demoralized and de- graded in body and mind. They live generally but a few years, and the majority of them, whether death comes early or late, die as abandoned women. Not a few students of the social evil regard the public-house as the chief recruit- ing office of the brothel. The starting and stopping station of public omnibuses should not be at public-houses, nor should these vehicles be labelled from these resorts. And publicans should not be allowed to sell drink to known habitual drunkards, nor to children. In a paper read some years ago in Liverpool, before the National Association for Promoting Amendment in the Laws relating to the Liquor Traffic, Canon Ellison quoted the following from a country journal : — " On Monday morning the magistrates of Liverpool had before them * The Church of England Temperance Chronicle (February 17, 18S3) cites as follows from the Irish Temperance Learjxie Journal : — " The disestablishment and disendowment of ' Barmaids ' is a coming question. In many quarters there ai'e signs of the steady advance- ment of a determination to do away with this blot upon English civilization. Why fair girls should be stationed behind bars for ten, twelve, and fourteen hours a day to bear the brunt of the meaningless compliments of the brainless boobies who pay so many twopences for the privilege, is more than passing strange. We put girls into taverns to sell drink to men, and men into shops to sell ribbons to girls ! " " ' I have heard publicans say they wished they had never entered the business, and would be glad to get out of it.' It was very diflBcnlt for barmen and barmaids to get out of it, as no one would employ them after they had been engaged in a public-house." — The Christia7i, March G, 1883. WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 369 twenty bojs and girls under the age of seventeen, all of whom had been found beastly drunk in the public streets on Sunday, and incapable of taking care of themselves. . . . Again, on a given Sunday 22,000 children were counted in the public-houses and beershops of Manchester ; and the clergyman, entering one of the beershops at one in the morning, found it full of boys and girls di'inking." During late years juvenile intemperance is on the instances of increase. As recently as last Christmas the papers reported te^*perance many pathetic examples. In the Daily Neics (December cited by the 28, 1883) appeared the following touching letter : — December!' 1883. " Girls axd Dogs. " Sir, — Your column of ' General Home News ' of this morning has two items, which, as they are next to each other in grim satire, ought not to be passed over without public attention being called to them. The first is the horrible stoi'y from Birmingham of two little gii'ls, nine and twelve years old respectively, together with a cousin ten years old, purchasing whisky, getting drunk, and almost killing themselves. The next is the story of three dogs at Castle Hedingham falling sick upon the road to the meet for fox-hunting, presumably having been poisoned. In this case ' great indignation was expressed by the public,' ' and the hunting for the day was postponed.' A reward of £50 has been offered for information which may bring the guilt home to the perpetrators. And what about the persons who supplied the drink to the three little girls ? Apparently no jiublic indignation is expressed at the Birmingham outrage. What, after all, are three children more or less in our overcrowded towns ? The bay of the foxhound is pleasant and cheery, and we cannot afford to lose that music on the hillside. The bitter cry of the outcast is not sweet, and the sooner we quench it in the water of death the better. So, of course, £50 for the discovery of the miscreant who poisoned the dogs ; for the licensed trader who gave the children whisky, com- pensation when the time comes to shut up his dram-shop. We have received from Birmingham much political light and leading. We shall wait anxiously to hear her voice, in answer to the piteous wail of her three children 2b 170 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. poisoned upon the nativity of the BetHehem infant. Youi's, etc. "Llewelyn D. Bevan. "Highbury, N., December 27." By the Globe. Imprison- ment u proper penalty for the crime of Helling or giving drink tu children. A few days later the Globe, commenting on this wicked condition of things, said — " It is most painful to see, from the provincial police- court records of Christmastide crime, that juvenile intem- perance is increasing. Instances are reported all over the kingdom, and in some the tipplers were girls of tender years. Thus, at Birmingham, two little damsels, the one nine and the other twelve, opened their money- boxes one night, and invested the contents, 2s., in whisky. Being joined by a ten-year-old cousin, the three sat down, and then and there consumed every drop of the spirit. They were afterwards found in a helpless state of intoxica- tion, and the youngest still remains seriously ill. But a boys' drinking-bout at Warrington actually terminated in the death of one lad, aged twelve, from alcoholic poisoning. He, and three other youngsters, bought a pint of whisky and drank it out of an egg-cup, apparently in an undiluted state. We could multiply these shocking instances almost indefinitely, and the question therefore arises as to whether some more stringent restrictions should not be placed on the sale of stimulants to children. In the Warrington case, the publican declared that he would not have sold the whisky to the lads if he had thought they intended to drink it themselves. The coroner, nevertheless, censured him for his carelessness ; and never was reprimand more richly deserved. When children ask to be served with spirits, it rests with them to show that they are merely employed as messengers, and any publican who does not exact full evidence on that head would not be a bit too heavily punished were his licence endorsed." It ought to be practicable to pass a law preventing the possibility of such degradation as this. No physician of any standing denies that drink is a poison to the young, and no father, mother, or guardian worthy of the name will allow minors under their charge to drink. It ought, in- deed, to be a prison offence for any full-grown person caught in the act of forcing or coaxing little ones to drink. WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 371 "There can be no question," sajs the Lancet (Maj, The tancer* 1883), "but that some change is urgently necessary °P™°" °" in relation to the facilities publicly offered for juvenile drinking, and, consequently, juvenile inebriety. Even ordinarily observant persons must have noticed the in- creasing frequency of that most melancholy and humili- ating of street spectacles — a drunken child. A drunken vv^oman is a deplorable presentment of human nature, but a drunken girl or boy is a more pitiful creature still. We have recently seen girls of apparently thirteen or fourteen years of age intoxicated with alarming fre- quency. Surely a short Act should be passed to render the supply of spirits, wine, or beer ' to be drunk on the premises,' by a boy or girl under sixteen years of age, a misdemeanour. All would unite in expediting such a measure. At present, as it appears to us, even respectable publicans have no objection to supply drink to mere children, although they are conspicuously zealous in thrust- ing these poor creatures into the street as soon as the first indication of di-unkenness is apparent." Unless the British Government soon attends to these evils, it seems likely that Russia will take precedence in reformatory legislation upon the drink question. Accord- ing to a letter from Odessa to Sir Wilfrid Lawson, dated March 21, ISB-l, and published in the Alliance News March 29, the new Russian project for regulating the sale of alcoholic liquors is thus quoted : " Clause II. enacts that any publican supplying drink to a person already intoxicated, or to young persons, is liable to a fine of 850 roubles (about £85), and to the deprivation of his licence or patent for three years, during which period he will not be allowed to occupy himself in any capacity whatever connected with the sale of liquors — not even as a waiter." * * The next two clauses are given as follows : — • " Clause III. enacts that any publican supplying a person with such a quantity of drink as to make him irresponsible for his actions, and if such person, after leaving the premises, be robbed or injured by accident, the publican in addition to the fine imposed under clause II., shall make good any loss by robbery in the one case, or pay all medical expenses in the other. " Clause IV. declares that where a person through excessive drinking dies in a public drinking-house, or if an intoxicated person 372 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Early habits and home example largely re- sponsible for the preva- lence of this vice among adults. Sir William Armstrong on pro- hibition of the propaga- tion of poverty and vice. r>r. Norman Kerr and the Dalrymple Home. There is no doubt that the amount of drunlcenness we see among all classes of people is in a very great degree the outcome of habits formed in earliest youth. The use of alcohol is associated with home scenes around the parents' table and with social pleasures ; it is carried on by the very passivity and plasticity of man's moral development, up through the whole period, of physical constrnction and ripening, until it is fixed in and part of his maturity. § 87. Another indirect prohibitory measure that may become practicable applies to the prevention, by law, of pro- pagation of the race by habitual drunkards. Why should such a suggestion as this be adjudged out of the pale of consideration ? Laws are made and executed, by which life itself and all that is meant by individuality are under given circumstances deemed forfeit. Why should there be no laws, adequately conceived and eifected, which might practically abrogate the death-penalty by guarding the doors of life ? In an address to the Elswick Works Insti- tute, August 8, 1883, Sir William Armstrong made the following statement : — " The rapid growth of population is adverse to moral development, and, by increasing com- petition, for instance, tends to increase poverty. A crisis must apparently come when further multiplication must be controlled by legislation, and the violation of liberty may be involved." What Sir William Armstrong thus impressively says of the propagation of poverty is certainly applicable to the propagation of habitual di-unkards, even without dwell- ing on the point that poverty and drunkenness produce each other. § 88. The brave efforts of Dr. Norman Kerr for the realization and extension of the Dalrymple Home for the cure of habitual drunkards, deserve encouragement and support. But the authority of the management should also be enlarged. The chief support of this or any similar insti- tution should devolve upon the State. Any one who had a respectable medical certificate that he was an eligible applicant, should be admitted, and the satisfactory evidence lose his life in any drunken brawl on the premises or after leaving (cases, unhappily, not uncommon in Knssia), the publican shall suffer two years' imprisonment and make a suitable provision for the wife and family or dependent relatives of the deceased." WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 373 of a person's being an habitual drunkard should make his removal to an asylum for habitual drunkards as compul- sory as would be the removal of a proved lunatic to an asylum for the insane, and State supervision should be as strict as over our prisons and insane asylums — absolute cure being the condition on which an inmate should be allowed to re-enter the world. Those who were present at the inauguration of the Dalrymple Home (October 29, 1883), and heard the earnest addi'esses by Sir Charles Tupper, ex-premier of Nova Scotia, who instanced the model management and grand success of such institutions in America ; * of Sir Spencer Wells, * These details are from the Temperance Record (November 1, 1883) : " The Hon. Conrad Dillon, who has recently returned from a rapid trip through the United States, has favoured us with a few notes of visits paid by him to four institutions for the reclamation and reformation of the victims of strong drink. " At San Francisco, California, the Inebriates' Home is under the management of a body of trustees who are recognized by the State, and have power to receive and detain persons for certain periods. The home is situated in a pleasant part of the city, and has accomnio- dation for about sixty or seventy inmates, about two-thirds of whom are males. Many of the patients go voluntarily, but others are com- mitted under a judge's order for a term of twenty days. Dr. R. H. McDonald, the president of the Pacific Bank, an active temperance reformer and philanthropist, is the chairman of the trustees, who are assisted by Dr. Jewell, the resident physician. The patients are detained for a few days in the hospital, after which they have access to the reading-rooms and other more cheerful parts of the building. The women's department is of course entirely separated, though under the same roof. No report is published of the home, and every effort is made to avoid jaublicity, which might deter sufferers from taking advantage of it. " The Washingtonian Home of Chicago is somewhat larger. Here the average number of inmates (all male) is about eighty, the total number of admissions last year having been six hundred and seventy, of whom one hundred and two wei'e police-court cases. The com- mittee of directors have power to admit and detain prisoners com- mitted to the bridewell for " intemperance, drunkenness, or any misdemeanour caused thereby," for the term of their sentence. The patients are required to contribute according to their means, though many are admitted free. On the whole nearly sixty per cent, of the expense is contributed by the inmates. The special feature of this home is that an attempt is made not merely to recover, but to educate the patients. During the first fortnight, as a rule, they remain in the home, and attend a series of lectures on physiology, especially relating to the effects of narcotics and stimulants on the various organs, as 374 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. president Royal College of Surgeons ; Dr. Hare, president of the Metropolitan. Branch of the British Medical Associa- tion, and other well-known -workers in the temperance cause, cannot help feeling that it is the great duty of Englishmen to urge adequate legislation on this subject. well as the effect of alcohol on the moral affections and passions. Pro- fessor Wilkins, the superintendent, whose heart and soul is in the work, soon makes an impression on all who have the slightest desire to reform, and, by his kindly sympathy and advice, revives hope in the breast of many a poor victim. If sufBcient progress is made at the end of a fortnight, the patient goes out during the day to his employment, returning for meals, and thus gradually slides back to his place in the outer world. The experience meeting on Sunday evening is a serious affair, and though the histories related are often sad, many successful cases starting from declarations made there in years gone by, testify to the value of the work. Friends of the inmates and former inmates are welcome at the meetings. " The Martha Washington Home, which is situated about six miles out of the town, is conducted by the same board, and though only opened recently, gives promise of that rewai'd which always attends the untiring efforts of thoroughly earnest workers, guided alone by the highest religions motives. The money raised by licences in Chicago and Cooks County, amounting to about £1,200 a year, is entirely devoted to these two institutions. " The New York Christian Home for Intemperate Men, which was till lately presided over by the Hon. W. E. Dodge, has recently moved into a fine new building at the corner of the Madison Avenue, and 86th Street. Here the committee have power to receive and detain inebriate men who enter voluntarily for a period not exceeding sixty days, and every effort is made during that time for their " physical, social, mental, and spiritual " improvement. The institution claims that of the nine hundred men who have been received since 1877, a majority give every evidence of living consistent lives. This result is attributed to the prominent position given to religious instruction and exhortation, and, indeed, unless patients express a desire to refoim they are not allowed to remain. " The value of these homes cannot be accurately estimated, for many who have benefited most by them follow the example of the nine lepers. That the work is of great practical value cannot be doubted, though many will avail themselves of the relief and then return straight to their old habits. The staj^ in all is too limited for much good to be expected in old cases, but the easy access and prospect of returning quickly to the world no doubt induces many to avail themselves of the treatment at an earlier stage than they would if the seclusion were longer. The facility for a recommencement of work which is impossible in a country liomc, is an important feature, as well as the opportunities offered for joining temperance societies before throwing off the restraint of the home." WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 375 In his report (Marcli, 1884, about four months after its inauguration) on the working of the Dalrymple Home, made to the Medical Temperance Association, Dr. Kerr said — " Without an exception, all whose terms have as yet expired have applied to be allowed to remain longer — as long, in fact, as financial or business considerations will admit of. " With all this success, there is one regret, the necessity of refusing many applications for admission. If the sum of £2,500 were forthcoming, accommodation for twelve more patients could be added, and we rely on the prompt and libei'al support of the Christian and philanthropic public. Were the committee supplied with adequate funds, they would gladly establish a Home for Females, and a thii'd Home for Habitual Drunkards of very limited means. To free the existing Dalrymple Home from debt £2,000 is still needed." Dr. Thomas Hawksley is quoted in Church of England yit. Thomas Temperance Society (October 6), as saying : — "It is useless Hawksieyon to tell these fallen and unhappy ones of the virtues of habitual temperance ; their consciences are dead, and an impervious drunkards. and insatiable demon has possession of them. You might as well attempt to reason with a hopeless lunatic. Until the laws of the country treat this form of madness like other lunacy, and deal with it by a sufficiently long sus- tained coercion, so long, it is to be hoped, there will be found a self-denying and heroic band of men and women who, by a vow of total abstinence faithfully carried out, show the right way to their weaker brethren, and demon- strate how perfectly health and happiness may be sustained without the smallest aid from agencies which to so great an extent are proved to be the facilis descensus to all the other sins and crimes of our fallen moral nature." The Church of England Temperance Chronicle, November The Lambeth 15, 1883, says :— " At a meeting of the Lambeth Board of f^iLon Guardians on Wednesday, it was moved — ' That this board, the necessity being deeply impressed with the necessity of provision the'^HaWtuai being: made for the more strinc^ent dealing with habitual drunkard's . . Act drunkards, do memorialize the Local Government Board to take such steps as will lead to the law being so amended as to give power to local authorities or boards of guardians 376 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. to establisli and maintain inebriate retreats, eitlier in con- nection with, existing Avorkliouses or asylums or in separate establislinients, as may be tliouglit most desirable ; and, furtber, that power be given to magistrates to commit habitual drunkards to such retreats witb or without their consent, provision being made for the recovery of the cost of their maintenance when it is ascertained that persons restrained have means for their own support, or that there are relatives or guardians who under the existing law are liable and able, wholly or partially, to maintain them.' — The motion was carried, thei*e being only one dissentient." The need of § 89- One powerful and comprehensive initiatory mea- internationai suTO for Optional and prohibitory leo-islation, for which the rdsitions in */ cu ^ view of times seem ripe, is that of the establishment of international drink"i^eis- relations On the drink question. There can be no doubt lation. that for England to inaugurate a system of drastic liquor legislation without such, an understanding with other countries would seriously affect international commercial relations ; i.e., if those countries in which such legislation would most interfere with the existing order of things, had not first been taken into England's confidence and invited to co-operate, and had theii' just demands considered and, so far as possible, satisfied. But having faithfully made these efforts, England ought then to carry her scheme into effect. And there should be no question of compensation for direct losses to other countries, and on exactly the same grounds and for the same reasons that no compensation — except such as Kes in special opportunities in proper fields of commerce — ought to be made to dispossessed publicans. For if publicans within the country are compensated, then, logically and upon the same scale, ought compensation to be extended to foreign ti^aders. The need of Indeed, there are certain measures which only an agreement"* international agreement Avould make possible, such, for for the gene- instance, as the right to suppress the liquor traffic at sea. sionof liquor In the International Conference at the Hague in 1881, the geas"*^""*^^ fearful consequences in shipwrecks and loss of life due to this cause were pointed out, and a resolution passed to try and induce the respective governments to put an end to that form of the traffic ; and it was recently stated by a correspondent of the Liverpool Joiirnal of Commerce that WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 377 the British. Government are taking steps to put an end to this traffic on the North Sea, and to that end would seek to arrive at an understanding with the other countries who are parties to the North Sea Fisheries Convention. International exchange of information as to the various legislative measures taken, the commissioning of official representatives to international conferences on the drink question, and other steps of a cognate nature, would all be means for promoting the good work of bringing the nations into a closer bond of common fellowship, and be, at the same time, tending to bring about a most healthful spirit of international emulation for good legislation. § 90. Alcohol is so potent and subtle a destroyer of \'^® °*'^/',/'?'" the best qualities in man and the race; so much more naentofa^ formidable and complex in its effects than is any other P"?J*"f°* foe to man's physical, mental, and moral health — to his commission happiness and usefulness on earth — that this Government ^^to^t'ue"^^ ought to insist upon the establishment of a permanent -nhoie national commission, in every way fitted and provided aU;ohoi'and with the necessary means for investigating the whole man. question of alcohol and man. It is a far greater evil than that of poverty, and, in fact, as was pointed out in chapter x., poverty would hardly prove a considerable problem to a sober nation, and even if it were, a sober nation would be amply adequate to cope with it. If the Royal Commission for Housing the Poor will study the cause, the all-promoting cause, of poverty — drink — and probe and expose this source of evil in a thorough conscientious manner, then will its work be, and deserve to be, blessed indeed, and its members will reap for themselves the rich harvest of the people's con- fidence and gratitude. But this should only precede, not take the place of, the establishment of a permanent official commission of inquiry into the whole drink question, which should annually issue a full report of the results of its investigation, the report to be sold at cost price all over the land. The commission established in Switzerland to this end might fui-nish suggestions for formation, character, duties, responsibilities, etc. Among reforms needed to facilitate effective legislation generally would be that of an enactment by which members directly interested in any legislation should de facto be 37ii THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. disqualified from voting in sncli cases ; just as much, and for precisely the same reasons, that interested parties are excluded from juries. § 91. Legislative and social efforts — essential fore- runners of direct temperance legislation — have been for some years continually increasing in number. One of these, known as the coffee tavern and street stall move- ment, has already become very popular.* * It is of the utmost importance that the public mind should be disabused of the idea that the various non-alcoholic drinks are substitutes for alcohol, or that any sach substitutes are required. Alcohol is a poison through and through ; the real substitutes for it are also poisons, viz., ethers, chloral, etc. The Son of Temperance (April, 1884) makes these pertinent remarks — " When a man -nho sticks to alcohol sees an abstainer drinking a 'done or an 'ade, he naturally concludes that the vchole question at issue is simply one as to the sort of tipple. The alcoholist declares his weak wine to be no viler a compound nor more hui'tful than the stuff drunk as a substitute by the abstainer. And in this particular he is not very far wrong, for some of the so-called ' teetotal drinks ' are the grossest of frauds upon the stomach as well as the pocket. Drinking them thus confuses the issue, and makes it a question of the sort of tipple, rather than one of the disuse of a worse than worthless drink. It does even more. The habit of using a substitute gives an impression that there is a natural want. Taste and expense then become important factors. If there be no saving in the latter the former prevails, and a lapse is the consequence. Many a man who has by his own habits thus obscured the issue has been lost to the movement. Then, again, quite apart from economic and physical considerations, there is the habit of drinking for the mere purpose of drinking. Substitutes perpetuate this ridiculous and pernicious habit. What greater folly can be conceived than liquoring- up at all hours of the day, and for every possible excuse ! Substitutes supply the means, and the result is a waste of time and energy by continuance in the old practice." Among healthful invigorating drinks, besides water, are: Hot milk, of which the Louisville Medical Neivs CNovember 10, 1883) says, " Milk that is heated too much above 100° Fahr, loses, for the time, a degree of its sweetness and density ; but no one fatigued by over- exertion of body or mind who has ever experienced the reviving influence of a tumbler of this beverage as hot as it can be sipped, will willingly forego a resort to it because of its having been rendered somewhat less acceptable to the palate. The promjjtness with which its cordial influence is felt is indeed surprising. Some portions seem to be digested and appropriated almost immediately ; and many who fancy that they need alcoholic stimulants when exhausted by labour of brain or body, will find in this simple draught an equivalent that WHAT CAN BE DOXE ? 379 The British coffee tavern temperance movement seems The origin to have had its origin in the novel and very noble efforts fi^^ment'of temperance will be as abundantly satisfying and more enduring in its effects." coffee- And oatmeal drink, the late Dr. Parkes' receipt for which is given pw^Qd" here as found in the Church of England I'emperance Chronicle (June Their 9, 1883) : " The proportions are ^Ib. of oatmeal to two or three quarts character of water, according to the heat of the day, and the work and thirst ; ^""^ "^'^' it should be well boiled, and then an ounce or one and a half ounces of brown sugar added. If you find it thicker than you like, add three quarts of water. Before drinking it shake up the oatmeal well through the liquid. In summer drink this cold ; in winter hot. You will find this not only quenches thirst, but will give you more strength and endurance than any other drink. If you cannot boil it, you can take a little oatmeal mixed with cold water and sugar, but this is not so good ; always boil it if you can. If at any time you have to make a very long day, as iu harvest, and cannot stop for meals, increase the oatmeal to ^Ib. or even fib., and the water to three quarts if yon are likely to be very thirsty. If you cannot get oatmeal, wheat-flour will do, but not quite so well. Those who tried this recipe last year found that they could get through more work than when using beer, and were stronger and healthier at the end of the harvest. Cold tea and skim milk are also found to be better than beer, but not equal to the oatmeal drink." An excellent promoter of easy digestion is malt extract. Barley possesses such an abundance of diastase or starch-digesting principle, that malt or an extract from it, if properly prepared, is not only nutritive by reason of the malt sugar, dextrine, and phosphates which it contains, but highly digestive of other starchy foods also, as bread, potatoes, etc. Many persons who are aware of the nutritive and digestive properties of barley malt, resort to beer and other fermented alcoholic liquors, prepared in part from malt, as the most available or proper preparation. But this course is a most mistaken one ; for in the first place, in the process of boiling the sweet wort or infusion of malt for the manufacture of beer, aU the digestive properties are entirely destroyed, as diastase is rendered quite inert by a temperature of 130°. Therefore beer possesses no ability to aid digestion, and the alcohol it contains we know to be a retarder of digestion. Secondly, in brewing, the nutritive principles are almost all sacrificed by fermentation for the production of alcohol. We find, therefore, in beer hardly anything whatever of the nutritive or digestive beneficial properties of malt, but simply a solution of weak alcohol in a great deal of water, with such other additions as brewers chose to make for the sake of colour or flavour. In order to preserve the nutritive value of malt. Prof. Baron Liebig originated the idea of evaporating the infusion or sweet wort to the consistency of a symp, in which condition it would keep indefinitely. This pro- cess, however, being conducted in an open pan or kettle, and by boiling, the digestive principle was entirely destroyed. By the Kepler process, the evaporation of sweet wort is conducted at a low temper- 380 THE FOUNDATIOX OF DEATH. The promi- nent part taken by Jlrs. George Bayly in this movement. Reasons for the poor results of the coffee taverns in London. of Captain and Mrs. George Bayly. In 1853 Mrs. Bayly had started a series of Mothers' Meetings in dotting Dale and its \'icinity for the purpose of rendering mutual assist- ance in saving young men from the drink-shops, and helping those women who snffered because of a drinking husband or father. It was finally resolved at these meetings that steps must be taken to reach the drinking men directly, and in relation to this, Captain Bayly, writing to me, April 11, 1884, says, " On the 1st of February, 1860, Mrs. Bayly invited sixteen of the most notorious drunkards in the Potteries (Kensington) to tea and spend the evening, the result being that five signed the pledge, and in the course of the year more than one hundi'ed signed. . . . At a meeting a man said, ' We want a public-house without the drink ! ' and on March 16th one was opened and called the ' Workmen's Hall.' " The " public-house without the drink " became the coffee taverns of which, particularly during the last two or three years, a great number have been established all over the land, owing chiefly to the exertions of the Church of England Temperance Society. That great good has been accomplished through the agency of these taverns and stalls cannot be doubted ; but while in Leeds and other places the coffee taverns pay fifteen or twenty per cent., in London the results have been most unsatisfactory, because of the poor furnishing and wretched management of these places. At a meeting (March 15, 1884) of the relieving officers atnre in vacuo, not exceeding 100° Fahr., so that the diastase is fully preserved; and in this product all the valuable properties of malt are preserved in concentrated form, viz., diastase, dextrine, malt sugar, phosphates, and albumenoids, all highly necessary to the human physical growth and health. The Medical Press and Circxdar (London), in reporting on this subject, says that the Kepler Extract of Malt is reliable, and is manufactured in such careful manner as to ensure the preservation of its valuable constituents. It is very delicious to the taste, and has been found by analysis to be exceedingly rich in diastase, and consequently is a valuable digestive agent. The Lancet reports upon the Kepler extract as the best known, and in this country (England) the largest used extract of malt. It is as distinct an advance in therapeutics as was the introduction of cod- liver oil. Used with milk, with water, or with soda-water, it makes a nourishing, refreshing drink. WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 381 of metropolitaa unions invited by the committee of the National Temperance League, " Mr. Birch, for sixteen years a relieving officer in the Holbom union district, said he thought that drink produced three-fourths o£ the pauperism with which they had to contend. . . . He sincerely hoped that the friends of temperance would endeavour to find some really palatable diink to take the people off intoxicating beverages. As to the coifee taverns, the stuff they sold was not worth drinking. The one they opened in Gray's Inn Road sold articles which the British working man could not be expected to consume, and it was now shut up. . . . A relieving officer from the Whitechapel district said he was glad the first speaker had put the estimate of the drink-caused pauperism at three-fourths. It was a low estimate, but it was one with which they could all agree. Had it been put as high as nine-tenths, he personally should not have objected to it. . . . Mr. Wright said that he had an all-round experience of London, and could testify that the great cause of pauperism was di"ink. Another cause was the wretched homes in which the people lived, making the public-house the only bit of comfort they could get. His experience of the coffee tavern was anything but to their credit. The articles sold at them were so bad that he did not wonder at people forsaking them for the public-house. There was one man doing an immense and successful work for temperance, and that was Mr. Lockhart. The viands he sold were worth the money he charged for them, and his establishments were greatly appreciated by the poor. Let the coffee taverns imitate his method, and they would succeed." * Recently a number of interesting letters on this subject have appeared in the Daily Chronicle, on which, in its editorial, April 21, 1884, it comments as follows: — "That the Coffee Palace Movement, in the metropolis The Bail;/ at least, has not been so brilliantly successful as its pro- i^^^^^^^f^ motors anticipated must, we fear, be admitted. We have ment of these received numbers of letters from correspondents complain- cents'.* " ing of the wretched accommodation provided and the doubtful quality of the refreshments supplied at many of the establishments described as coffee palaces. ... It would * Temperance Record, March 20, 1884. 382 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. be unfair to deny that some of these temperance restaurants are admirably conducted and well-found in every respect, but, as a rule, the coffee palaces are scarcely places to which a philosopher would resort in order to find justifi- cation for taking a cheerful view of the problem of existence. When we remember that the great object of the coffee palace movement was to provide counter attractions to the public-houses, and thus to mark the commencement of a new era in the history of social recreation and enjoyment, we cannot admit that the object has been fulfilled. The muddy-brown liquid sold for coffee at the coffee palaces is not calculated to impress people with the advantages of a temperance dietary. If the British workman is to be persuaded to give up his beer, he must be offered something better than a washy solution of horse-beans, rotten dates, and burnt figs. Genuine coffee can be brewed for the price charged for the adulterated rubbish which, if our numerous correspondents are to be believed, is supplied at most of the coffee palaces. We call attention to this matter in the interests of temperance, and should be sorry to say anything detrimental to the cause. We do not see how it is to prosper with the assistance of adulteration. Coffee palaces cannot be suc- cessful unless they supply the public with coffee. We trust, therefore, that the promoters of the temperance movement will endeavour to put a stop to the distribution of the objectionable stuff at present sold at their 'palaces.' The buildings themselves, too, would be better adapted to the purpose for which they were designed if an appearance of cheerfulness, comfort, and cleanliness were imparted to them." To be completely successful, English coffee taverns must supply the best coffee, tea, etc., at the cheapest rates, and to enable them to do this, the duty on tea, coffee, cocoa, etc., ought to be removed, and Java coffee should be as easily obtainable as any other kinds. The ladies who superintend these taverns should thoroughly understand how to prepare the drinks ; a book of com- plaint of management should be on hand at all taverns, in which complaints could be entered and subscribed to by witnesses or partners in the grievance. Friends and sup- porters of temperance should take a personal interest in WHAT CAX BE DONE ? 383 the attractiveness, propriety, excellence, and cheapness of such taverns, securing for them the best bread and butter, cold meats, cheese, coffee, tea, cocoa, chocolate, milk, etc. They should have neat reading-rooms, with the prin- cipal daily and weekly papers, magazines, and sterling light and simple literature in plenty, not simply such books as can be got at cheapest, at an auction, or given by some- body without care or selection ; on the contrary, it should be an absolute condition that none but thoroughly whole- some books should be admitted, i.e., upon the decision of a competent committee. There should be special meetings and gatherings so arranged as to secure not only social entertainment, but strengthening of the main purpose which brings them together.* For unless the coffee tavern outbids the conveniences of the liquor shop, it will be beaten in the race. But in order to meet the great requirement of the time Suggestion — a substitute for the public-house ; a substitute not in the [hgMffee-" sense of equivalent, but a substitute in the sense that it tavern pro- shall displace and victoriously supplant the public-house onhesteam — why should not the coffee-tavern system be merged in i^itchen. a more comprehensive plan, by which not only healthy drinks, good amusements, and wholesome literature, but the entire physiological needs of man could be amply and cheaply supplied ? One of the first efforts in this direction was made at First efforts the close of the last century by the famous scientist and of 'th^'^st^ea^m philanthropist. Count Rumforcl, w^ho invented the well- kitchen known Rumford soup. The institutions supplying the ontheconti- Rumford soup, during 1818, and again in 1846, 1847, and ^^^;^^^^ 1848, did much to save Germany from the horrors of a Morgen- Etem's steam kitchen in * The Echo (October 11, 1883) mentions a good movement m Berlin, behalf of boys, as follows : — " To-morrow a meeting will be held at the Mansion House to promote the formation of a Working Lads' Institute for East London. The object is to promote the welfare of the working lads of the Metropolis by establishing in those neighbourhoods where large numbers are employed or reside, institutes where such youths may profitably spend their evening hours, and so be saved from tempta- tions and snares of the streets, the public-houses, music-halls, and ' penny gaffs.' In connection with each institute will be provided healthy recreation, good and useful reading, and the means of educational and moral improvement." 384 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Mr. L. 0. Smith's steam kitchen in Stockholm, and his own account of its import- ance and ■work. general famine. In 1866 Mrs. Lina Morgenstern * built her larsre and now famous steam kitchen, where all food is prepared scrupulously in accordance with the highest sanitary and scientific methods, is served daintily on the premises, or sent to order, and in all cases sold at the cheapest possible rates. This experiment is now being tried in Stockholm with marked success by Mr. L. O. Smith, the " ex-Brandy King " of Sweden, and there can be no doubt of its success, if properly introduced, in England. Co-operation is the watchword of the hour. We practise it with advantage in commercial, industrial, and agricul- tural pursuits, why should not co-operative food prepara- tion and sale prove successful ? Indeed, so far as the masses of both head and hand labourers are concerned, there is every reason to expect that such co-operation will prove in almost every respect more advantageous than any other form. I have not the space here for treating this great question in detail, I can only throw out a hint or two, and cite briefly from Mr. Smith's experiences. It is impossible that food should be prepared either ^s well or as cheaply in the labourer's home, with its generally imperfect domestic facilities, as it could be in a large steam kitchen specially and skilfully constructed, and stocked with utensil and material for feeding thousands of persons. And while poor and badly cooked food notably prepares the stomach to crave for strong drink, nutritious, easily digested, and well-cooked food as notably serves to render the system less tolerant of strong drink, and good health means temperate desires, better work, and that self-reliance which makes a man able to take proper care of himself, and be helpful to others also. From Mr. Smith's views of the working and results of the steam kitchen system, as reported in the Pall Mall Gazette (April 3, 1884), I make the following' quotations : — " Of the expenditure of a working man, 15 per cent, only goes in house-rent, w^hile 60 per cent, goes in food. Therefore, if you provide every working man with a free house for ever, the effect is only equal to saving him * Die Volksliicken Wirtscliafiliclie Artftalten fiir hillirie nalirende uSchmaclihafteMassenspeisung im Krieg u Frieden. Lina Morgenstern. Berlin, 1883. WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 385 15 per cent, of his wages. But if you can make a radical reforinatioii in his food, you have a much greater margin to play upon. If you could provide him with food twice as nourishing as that which he gets now, so that he only needs to buy half as much of it, or if you give him as much food as he gets at present at half the price, you save him at one stroke 30 per cent, of his wages, or twice as much as the whole of his house-rent. And it can be done." * As to the best system of cooking, Mr. Smith says : " I have examined almost every system of cooking that is known to civilized man ; and I have now come to the conclusion that no system is so good as that of cooking by steam water bath, so economical, so efficient. In cooking the great thing is temperature ; and by this means it is possible either to roast or to boil each description of food at the exact degree of the thermometer that is necessary. The system at present in use in the barracks of the German army is by far the best. I have bought up the patent for Norway and Sweden ; and before long I expect to have the machines in working order in every town in the whole country. You may think this is a simple matter ; but let me tell you the results. In Sweden the working man, at the ordinary cook-shops, will pay Is. 'M. a day for three meals for himself. At my kitchen I supply him with three meals a day for 8(Z., making a saving of 40 per cent., and for this 8fZ. I supply much better food — the very best that can be bought anywhere, and much better cooked than you can get in any hotels in London. I can do this and make a profit at it — a profit of l^d. on each day. I charge them - ^ more than cost price in order that the profits may accumu- late for establishing other kitchens in other places, and for furnishing the kitchens with adjuncts in the shape of music- halls, libraries, etc., while a part of the accumulated profit is devoted to providing pensions for members in old age." And as to the management, he adds : " Come to Stockholm, and I will show you my kitchen in working order. Every Saturday night those who wish to avail themselves of the kitchen must pay an advance * In an Open Letter to the Worlcing Men of Sweden, Mr. Smith says he even thinks that as much as 40 per cent, of the present costs of food might thus be saved. 2c 38G THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. for the whole seven days. They receive twenty-one tickets, one for each meal. They can give them away if they please, but they are never wasted. We know, therefore, exactly to one meal how many will be required through the week. At Berlin, where there is a society of charitable ladies who supply cheap food for the people, they supply it to any one who conies, and, as a consequence, they never know whether their demand will be great or small, and they have to eat up one day what is left over from another. Under my system nothing is left over. We know exactly what is wanted, and it is cooked fresh when it is vp anted. The people can either come and eat their meal at the kitchen, or they can bring it home in vessels which keep it warm. I send out meals to factories and workshops in vessels so constructed that they keep warm for hours. There is nothing wasted, and the food is apportioned, according to the season of the year, on the most scientific principles. Care is taken to provide exactly the number of grammes of fatty matter and albumen — in winter more fat, in spring more albumen ; but the correct proportion is always maintained. We have all varieties of food, each cooked in its own proper way to perfection. In the course of the year we have as many as sixty menus from which people can take their choice. The economy resulting is surprising. The waste of separate fires and separate kitchen rooms is appalling. I undertake to provide any family of man, wife, and two children, who will pay me the rent of their kitchen and the cost of their fuel, with dinner all the year round for nothing ! " During his recent visit to London, Mr. Smith told me that by next autumn he expected to have ten large steam kitchens at work in Stockholm. Pure water § 92. A remedial measure of the very first importance, eHRcntiai for ill which State, Church, society, and the individual ought to h^'^ith'^ co-operate, is that of procuring for all localities an abundant, permanent, free supply of fresh, pure, sparkling water. Mr Thomas " Spring or fountain water," says Thomas Tryon, in his water 0697). Way to save Wealth (London, 1697), "is the most whole- some and sweet of all drinks. A sober man coming to a feast eats his meat (food) with six times more delight than the other, because he brings an exact palate to taste, and a clean and shai'p stomach to entertain it." WHAT CAN BE DONE ? SS7 Tn An Tjssay on Health and Long Life (London, 1725), Dr. George Dr. George Cheyne says — " Without peradventure water [j^g^game" was the primitive original drink, and happy had it been (i725). for the race of mankind if other mixed and artificial liquors had never been invented. Water alone is sufficient and effectual for all the purposes of human wants in drink. Common sense will tell us that the purest and thinnest water is fittest to circulate through tubes so infinitely small as some in animal bodies are, and even that it alone will nourish plants and bring them to perfection." In dealing with the physiological effects of alcohol we saw how overwhelming is the bodily need of water, that water is the first, food the second, necessity. And there- fore it may justly be claimed that for health and normal living, the supply of pure water is as necessary as the supply of pure food. Some cities — Antwerp among others — have recently Water secured this priceless boon for the inhabitants, and the Antvrap. "^ laws for the water supply in Antwerp provide that in whatsoever house the landlord has not complied with this ordinance, he can be legally compelled at once to do so. As to London, for upwards of thirty years there has been The agit»- a constant agitation in this direction, though it has not as pure^w^ter yet met with complete success. Early in 1859 an associa- supply in tion for the erection of drinking-fountains was formed in during the London bv Lord John Russell, and in April of that year it lasttwenty- .-^ .•* five years. held an important meeting.* Lord Shaftesbury and the chairman. Lord Carlisle, were the most prominent speakers. The latter said he thought "all present would agree with him" that "gin- palaces and beer-houses were the most besetting evils of London, and that drinking-fountains would in some measure alleviate these." Earl Shaftesbury said that pure water was an im- perative need ; they were to recollect the general condition of the working classes in this respect. The water was generally received into butts which stood in the outer yard, * The first fountain, near St. Sepulchre's Church, in Skinner Street, was built the same month. In June, 1862, the magnificent fountain in Victoria Park was inaugurated by its donor, Miss — now Baroness — Burdett-Coutts. Since then between three and four hundred have been erected all over the metropolis. in London. 388 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. "where tliey absorbed all the foul air and gases that passed over them.* During last year an agitation of a more effective character, and which gives promise of ultimate success, A writer in called forth the following letter to the Fall Mall Gazette the Pall Mall .. , .^ iqqo\ Gazetteon (Angust IS, lobo) : the present watersuppiy " SiR, — Five of the metropolitan water companies draw their supplies from the Thames above Teddington Lock. The average daily flow of the river at the intakes during August is 500,000,000 gallons. These companies abstract 68,000,000 gallons per day — that is, a little more than one eighth of the total flow. They possess power to abstract 110,000,000 gallons per day. On the drainage area of the Thames there dwell 900,000 people (including 200,000 in towns of upwards of 2,000 inhabitants), and upon it there live 60,000 horses, 160,000 cattle, 900,000 sheep, and 120,000 pigs. Their sewage and refuse pass into the Thames, either directly or indirectly. The theory that polluted river-water purifies itself in its flow has been proved to be false. After filtration this water is sent to London. It is considered very satisfactory when filtration removes 28 per cent, of the organic impurities, leaving 72 per cent, to be supplied in solution to the consumer. The companies derive a gross annual income of £750,000 for this supply. The volume of the flow in the river is fairly constant, but the amounts of its pollution and of the quantities abstracted daily are necessarily increasing ones. The whole of these figures are taken from Bluebooks, and, if disputed, the reference for each will be given. " If it were possible for these companies to have a reservoir containing 68,000,000 gallons of absolutely pure w^ater, and into it were allowed to go the contents of water-closets, household slops, and manufacturing refuse of 112,500 people, in the same proportion in which they respectively enter the Thames at the present time, and in addition as much of the manure of 7,500 horses, 20,000 cattle, 112,500 sheep, and 15,000 pigs, as could find its way there, and if 28 per cent., or even 50 per cent., of * Recent inquiries into the circumstances of tbo London poor liave shown that tlie condition of things deprecated in 1859, have not been much improved in some of the London slums to-day. WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 389 these organic impurities were removed hj filtration, is there any householder in London who would use it for drinking and domestic purposes ? Yet this is pro rata what thej uncomplainingly receive and use every day. — I am, Sir, your obedient servant, "S." Undoubtedly there would be a hue and cry about the enormous cost of an undertaking such as has heen carried through in Antwerp, but suppose it were possible at the same cost to equally liberally supply beer and wine, would not the money be forthcoming ? And yet those compounds are poisons, and water is the principal need of life. There is little doubt that the use of intoxicating drinks would be infinitely reduced if, instead of these dead fluids from aqueducts and reservoirs, everybody in the large centres of the world could have an abundance of always fresh pure water always at hand.* Any one who has drunk from a mountain spring realizes the diiference. Grandly and permanently successful may the temperance agitation hope to become if it can secure sufficient public interest to obtain this priceless boon, this daily necessity to health from the cradle to the grave, and one more calcu- lated than is almost any other agent to widen the distance between them. Under the heading of Water for Infants, the New YorJc The .vej« Medical Record (August 18, 1883) says :— nZorTon'"' " With the exception of tuberculosis, no disease is so water for fatal in infancy as intestinal catari'h, occurring especially '° ^^ ^' during the hot summer months, and caused, in the majority of cases, by improper diet. There are many upon whom the idea does not seem to have impressed itself that an infant can be thirsty without at the same time being hungry. When milk, the chief food of infants, is given in excess, acid fermentation results, causing vomiting, diarrhoea, with passage of green or yellowish-green stools, elevated temperature, and the subsequent train of symptoms * Drinkers no less than abstainers ought to interest themselves in this subject, because their drinks, besides the alcohol and various adulterating compounds, consist, as they know, mostly of water — exactly the same kind of water which the abstainer takes, minus the other compounds. 390 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Dr. James Wilson on the thera- peutic pro- perties of water. The Lancet on water- drinking. which are too familiar to need repetition. The same thing' w^ould occur in the adult if drenched with milk. The infant needs not food, but drink. The recommendation of some writers, that barley-water or gum-water be given to the little patients in these cases, is sufficient explanation of their want of success in treating this affection. Pure water is perfectly iimocuous to infants ; it is difficult to conceive how the seeming prejudice to it ever arose. Any one who has ever noticed the avidity with which a fretful sick infant drinks water, and marks the early abatement of febrile and other symptoms, will be convinced that water as a beverage, a quencher of thirst, a physiological necessity, in fact, should not be denied to the helpless member of society. We have often seen an infant who has been dosed ad nauseam for gastro-intestinal irritability assume, almost at once, a more cheerful appearance, and rapidly grow better when treated to the much-needed draught of water. If any prescription is valuable enough to be used as routine practice, it is, ' Give the babies ivater.' " Of both the health-preserving and medicinal qualities of pure water. Dr. James Wilson writes : — " There is no agent applied to the human body, ex- ternally or internally, that has such influence in awakening all the vital powers to their gi'cat i-estorative capabilities, in arresting the progress of disease or preventing a fatal termination, as pure water. Administered at various tem- peratures, it is the most powerful remedy we possess ; a stimulant, a sedative, a diuretic, a sudorific." In an article on Water-drinMnrj , The Lancet (December 15, 1883) says— "It is somewhat surprising that in a country in which rain falls almost every day in large or small measure, the use of pure water as a drink is not better understood than it is. Even now that the sway of temperance is well estab- lished, and continues to extend, we should be surprised to learn that a majority of Englishmen do not habitually dis- card the use of the natural beverage for one or other in which it is compounded with foreign ingredients. Yet its very purity from all but a salutary trace of mineral matter is what renders it capable of exactly satisfying, and neither more nor less than satisfying, the needs of thirsty tissue, and of assisting by its mere diluent and solvent action, WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 891 without stimulation or other affection of function, the digestion and excretion of food. No other qualifications are necessarj. Given digestible, solid food, and fair — that is, normal — digestive power, water alone is all-sufficient as liquid. During the feebleness consequent on disease or overwork everything is changed. There is blood, though impoverished in quality, to receive and convey nutritive material, and there are tissues to be fed ; but the vis a tergo, the driving power of the heart, resides in a languid muscle, and the alimentary canal, itself but poorly irrigated from that centre of supply, receives w^hat food is taken only to prove its incapacity to utilize it. Nature is flagging, and a stimulant alone will make ends meet in the circle of tissue-building processes. As a general rule, however, abstinence holds the first rank, both in theory and practice. We do not assert that the man w^ho regularly, and in strict moderation, partakes of a light stimulant — claret, for instance — may not, especially if he is equally regular in regard to outdoor exercise, live comfortably to the full term of human life ; but what we say is that the more simply the man fares, the more he employs such adven- titious measures for actual physical necessity, the more he will gain in health, in life, in working power, and in aptitude to benefit by stimulation when strength is failing from disease or from decay. But if water be the drink, how shall it be drunk ? The means must have regard to the end required of them. To moisten food and prepare it for digestion, it is hardly necessary to say that it should be taken with a meal ; a couple of tumblerfuls at dinner is not an excessive quantity for most persons. For thirst- quenching properties nothing can surpass this simplest of drinks, and all which approach it in efficacy owe their power almost entirely to it. As to temperature, there is no real gi-ound for supposing that one should not drink a sufficiency of cold water when the body is heated by exertion. The inhabitants of hot climates have no such objection. Some tropical wells are dug so deep that the water within them, even in hot seasons, is as cool as that of a European spring. In fevers, too, the use of ice in quantities sufficient to allay thirst is a part of rational and legitimate treatment. The shock which has to be avoided in all such states is not that which cools the mucous 392 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. membrane, but tbat of slaarp cliill applied to the surface of the body. Some persons, however, find it convenient and beneficial to imbibe a certain amount of warm water daily, preferably at bedtime. They find that they thus obtain a bland diluent and laxative, without even the momentary reaction whicli follows the introduction of a colder fluid, and softened by abstraction of its calcareous matter in the previous process of boiling. This method, which is an accommodation to jaded stomachs, has its value for such, though it is not great even for them ; but it affords no noticeable advantage for those of greater tone. The use of water as an aid to excretion deserves some remark. In certain cases of renal disease it has been found to assist elimination of waste by flushing without in any way irritating the kidneys. Every one is probably aware of its similar action on the contents of the bowel when taken on the old-fashioned, but common-sense, plan of drinking a glass of water regularly morning and evening, without any solid food. Whatever may be true of harm- less luxuries, enough has been said to show that health, happiness, and work find stimulus enough in the un- sophisticated well of nature." Pr. noim's Those who imagine water to be such a weak and vapid bibliography -^i^ino-, would be interested in examining the bibliography on w&tcr in o' ,^7* .i Dr. zienis- on water (by Dr. Plohn) published in Dr. Ziemssen s ^book "Z^"^' Handbook of General Therapeutics (Leipsic, 1883), occupy- (ienerai {xi<^ tweuty-ciglit lai'gc octavo close and small-printed pages, Tierapeu ics. ^Y^^Mving the medical literature on water to be almost as voluminous as the religious literature on the Bible. Interesting Dr. Morcl, in Speaking of the fact that the practice l)r'Morei°^ of milking cows all the year round, during long ranges of to the re- generations has made the secretion of milk a constant vdwcTof ° instead of temporary function, cites the interesting cognate natural fact, that in Columbia, where circumstances, such as the when per- great superabundance of cattle, etc., have interrupted this thlmavti'^ practice, only a few years of freedom from its constraint uesisted have suflficcd to restore the organization to its primitive So if in our case the practice of drinking without reference to real thirst, and in obedience to craving pro- duced by injurious fluids, could be abrogated, and pure water be permitted to resume its original office in the WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 393 system, which it would do in all likelihood in an astonish- ingly short time, we are justified iu believing that it would mark an epoch in the condition of mankind, not only of physical, but of moral, mental, and spiritual health far closer to the pure ideal of humanity than we have yet reached or prefigured. § 93. A great step in the direction of reform in part The import- commenced, is that of educating the young to understand strucUng ' and respect their bodies. As earlj as 1856, at the Congres de ^"^^^jgj.™^*^ Bienfaisance (Brussels), it Avas proposed, as a means against their own intemperance, that all obstacles to the spread of useful g°pec^;nyi„ knowledge to the very lowest grades of society should be regard to the removed ; and Frere-Orban, Belgian Minister of Finance, does\othem. in his report on intoxicating drinks, to the Chamber, (1868), proposed the establishment of " a public system of education which tends to inculcate in the children, by counsels, pictures, and writings, horror of excess and fear of the evils sure to result from intemperance or the least use of intoxicating drinks.'^ The first active step in the direction of temperance education in England was taken by the National Temper- ance League, and in a special memorable meeting at Exeter Testimony Hall (February 13th, 1878), the Lord Bishop of Exeter, in Bishop o°f the chair, in a powerful and eloquent speech said, " Long Exeter. before this we ought to have made it one of the ordinary lessons in our elementary schools that one of the most awful evils that ever afflicted the country is to be found in the use of intoxicating liquors." Rev. Dr. Adamson, of the Edinburgh School Board, at Of the Rev. a public meeting at Galashiels (February, 1881), stated o/the EUin-' that " Ninety- four per cent, of the cases iu which parents turgh School failed to provide education for their children were found to be addicted to intemperance." Although elementary temperance literature has become more familiar to the children since it was allowed among text-books, very much yet remains to be done before either the schools or the little ones can be in a fit state for purposes of education. The popular education system is poor because it is so Why the meagrely supported by public funds. Leon Donnat, the education Belgian Statistician, in speaking of the relative amount of 394 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. system is poor. public money devoted to war and education, gives the following figures per capita, quoted in the Fall Mall Gazette for May 5, 1883 :— Education. Leon Don- •■ nat's esti- mates quoted jVanpp 90 in the Pail f/^^^'^® ; ~^ Mall Gazette England 18 oftherela- Holland 17 tive amounts Sa^onv 11 expended on ^#^°''^ ^ ,\^ education Wurtemberg... 11 and war by Bavaria 11 theEuropean Prussia 10 11 2 powers. War. d. 6 9 9 9 9 War. s. d. Russia 10 2 Denmark ... 8 8 Italy 7 6 Belgium 6 9 Austria 6 8 Switzerland ... 4 10 Education, s. d. n 7 8 3 6 Ex-Bailie Lewis on the inadequacy of the Com- pulsory Education Act and of sanitary agencies to uproot or essentially diminish the vice and misery pro- duced by the public- bouse. This comparison, of course, takes no account of the frightful waste entailed by the sacrifice of the labour of able-bodied men during the period of military service." As a consequence, there is neither the inducement nor effort on the part of the State to engage the best minds and characters in the education of the growing generation. Again, education is poor because it is almost wholly confined to the cultivation of the intellect : practical goodness, patience, conscientiousness, and self-control do not enter into the curriculum. How inadequate purely intellectual training is likely to be to fulfil the needs of well-rounded education, is strikingly indicated by the statistics as to the results of the Compulsory Education Act during the last ten years at Edinburgh. At the great Temperance Convention in Edinburgh, March 3, 1884, ex-Bailie David Lewis said that " During the last ten years the Compulsory Educa- tion Act had been in operation, and in this city had been wrought M-ith an efficiency second to no other place in the kingdom, while the educational system in Edinburgh was equal to that of any city of Europe. During the last ten years there had been expended on education in Edinburgh a sum of £1,035,000, while there were at present engaged a staff of 730 teachers. Notwithstanding the enormous amount of moral and educational power here represented, they found from the police returns that the number of drunken cases had increased from 5317 in 1872 to 7236 in 1882, being an increase of 26 per cent., while the increase of the population had only been 16 per cent. Again, they found Edinburgh presented an illustration of WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 395 the extent to wliicli sanitary agencies were counteracted by the drink evil. In 1867 an Act was passed for im- proving the waste places of the city. Upwards of half a million was expended in rooting out the haunts of wretchedness and vice ; while another half-million was expended on improved dwellings and other sanitary reforms. That the results of this grand sanitary experiment had been largely counteracted by the public-house w^as only too apparent. From 1867 up till 1879, when they had a change in the police law, the number of drunken cases increased 43 per cent., w^hile the population had only increased 16 per cent." Says Dr. Channing*,* " To educate is something more Dr. ciian- than to teach those elements of knowledge which are JJIuonof*^' needed to get a subsistence. It is to exercise and call out education. the higher faculties and affections of a human being. Education is not the authoritative, compulsory, mechanical training of passive pupils, but the influence of gifted and quickening minds on the spirits of the young. " Of what use, let me ask, is the ivealth of this community His views on but to train tip a better generation thayi ourselves ? Of what ofVeaith!** use is freedom, I ask, except to call forth the best powers of all classes and every individual ? What but human improvement is the great end of society ? " The poorest child ought to have liberal means of self- improvement, and were there a true reverence among us for human nature and for Christianity, he would find them." Education is poor also because it almost wholly fails to teach the knowledge of the body and how to take care of it. But in this respect a little light is breaking. In sect. 10, chap. 38 of the Revised Statutes of Temperance Massachusetts for 1872, occurs the following :— " It shall thetcho^oilof be the duty of the president, professors, and tutors of the Massachu- •• • setts 1872 University at Cambridge and of the several colleges, of all preceptors and teachers of academies, and of all other instructors of youth, to exert their best endeavours to impress on the minds of children and youth committed to their care and instruction the princij^les of piety and justice, and a sacred regard for truth; love of their * Temperance address, Boston, 1837. 396 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. country, humanity, and universal benevolence ; sobriety, industry, and frugality ; chastity, moderation, and temper- ance." The noble In England, owing to the faithful aiid skilful labours of the'Nationai ^be National Temperance League,* temperance has become Temperance a familiar theme in public schools. The Temperance Record the spread of for September 13, 1883, notes that — eStion"^ " ^^^^ Lords of the Committee of Council on Education have added hygiene to the list of sciences towards instruc- tion, in which aid is afforded by the Science and Art Department. " The syllabus of the subject that has been issued by the Education Department is as follows : — " ' Elementary Stage. — (1) Food, diet, and cooking ; (2) water and beverages ; (3) removal of waste and impurities; (4) air; (5) shelter and warming ; (6) local conditions; (7) personal hygiene ; (8) treatment of slight wounds and accidents. Advanced Stage. — (1) Food and adulterations ; (2) water and beverages ; (3) examination of air — chemical and microscopical ; (4) removal of waste and impurities ; (5) shelter and warming ; (6) local con- ditions ; (7) personal hygiene ; (8) prevention of disease. The Honour A Stage embraces, in addition to the above sub- divisions of the subject, (1) trades nuisances ; (2) vital statistics ; and (3) sanitary law.' " Cardinal And Cardinal Manning, according to the Daily Neios order fofthe (November 28, 1883), "has issued an order that a branch establish- of the Catholic Total Abstinence League of the Cross shall branches he formed in every Catholic school in the Archdiocese of of the Westminster ; and that the nianag-er of each school shall Catholic .- ■ 1 1 o 1 -11 Total Absti- 08 the president oi each branch ; and temperance literature League In ^^ ^° ^^ supplied to the pupils at weekly meetings of the every branches." ediooi'in the Considering the almost incalculable influence teachers Archdiocese havB over children, and the fact that in the elementary of A\ est- ... miuster. schools of England there are over four millions of children, what power must the teachers exert in determining the whole future of the nation ! and if they will use this power in impressing the gi'owing minds under their care with a full and particular knowledge of the facts concerning * The apostles of the National Temperance League are doing a great work in both army and navy. WHAT CAX BE DONE ? 397 tlie evil of alcoliolic liquors, what a miglitj work for temperance will be accomplished with the little ones them- selves and, through them, in innumerable homes threatened with or already fallen under this curse ! That similar grand school reforms are going forward Efforts to on the continent, is evident from the report, in the Temper- f'^'-^^^^^^ ance Record (September 20, 1883), of "an address delivered education in by Dr. Scholtz, of Bremen, on the 17th of May last, before ^/hoX; the Allgemeine Deutsche Lehrerversammlung, a national union of teachers, not exclusively, though of course largely, composed of elementary teachers, which met this year in that town. Dr. Scholtz propounded four theses, each of which he defended in turn. (1) That the teaching of hygiene should be obligatory in all schools. (2) Hygiene should be treated as a part of natural science. (3) The teaching of anatomy and physiology should be strictly limited to such points as have a direct bearing on the health of the individual. (4) Dr. Scholtz's last thesis was, that in the seminaries (i.e., training colleges) hygiene should be taught as an integral subject of study, for the good reason that he who attempts to teach the elements of a science should first be master of every part. The outline he sketched of the subjects to be taught is nearly identical with the syllabus recently issued by our department." Elementary temperance teaching is at present furnished ^^^ '" in many schools in Canada as well as in Australia, and the Austiairan, Tevipe7-ance Record (January 31, 1884) contains an article on ^"'^ . temperance work in United States' schools taken from the schools. National Temperance Advocate of New York, which says — " Already laws have been passed in Minnesota, Vermont, and Michigan, placing among the required studies in all schools supported by public money or under State control, physiology and hygiene, which shall give special promi- nence to the effect of alcoholic diinks upon the human system, and teachers must be examined in this as in other necessary studies. By circulating petitions and by other means similar laws for compulsory temperance education can be passed in every State, because people will vote for the education of their children far sooner than they will for prohibition." The Pall Mall Gazette (February 16, 1884) says— " An American Assembly-man, who holds that besides 398 . THE FOUXDATION OF DEATH. the three R's instruction in physiology and hygiene should be given in the public schools of America, has drafted a bill for that purpose. In his opinion it is necessary that some knowledge of the human body, and of the conditions under which that body can live in a healthy state, should be imparted to a child. And not only should this be taught, but it should be taught with especial reference to the effect of narcotic and alcoholic poisons on the human system. His bill requires that teachers applying for positions in the public schools shall be examined with reference to their knowledge of physiology and hygiene." The school An institution in connection with the public schools in system iif° Sweden which is greatly promotive of temperance is the Sweden. school savings-bank system, by which the pupils, boys and girls, are from their earliest years encouraged to deposit small sums, of only a few ore (ten ore a little more than one penny) at a time till a crown (a little over a shilling) has been laid up, when it is transferred to the real city savings-bank, so that when they come of age they have a little nest-egg to begin life with, and at the same time have acquired a rational practical habit of economy. The industry which goes naturally with economy and temperance is also practically taught in the workshop department of these schools in which the pupils receive regular instruction in all sorts of useful handicraft, and ornamental also. They receive twenty per cent, on the sale of the tools and implements they make, from knife handles and knife trays, to blackboard brushes and step- ladders. These schools have special tuition in the laws of health ; and as to the products of both animal and vegetable kingdoms, the girls are taught all the mechanical processes of milk and butter-making, the character and names of j all portions of fish and flesh as sold in the markets, and how to utilize them in the best methods of cooking, what to do with bones, fat, etc. ; the same with regard to vegetable, flax, hemp, etc. They are trained to describe the different materials and values of the clothing they have on, where in Sweden each particular animal product or fabi'ic are to be found, etc., etc. A most admirable preparation against the waste, carelessness, and degradation which are so much the results of iofnorance. WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 399 But the woi-st cause why popular education fails, and Poverty the the most difficult of remedy, is the miserable poverty * of ^f^pf^^T^ the masses Avhose children form the vast majority of the education, attendance at public schools ; and that drink is the chief thechie"f cause of this poverty,t does not change the fact that the cause of children, hungry, ill-clothed, and full of premature care, are in no condition to study, or to profit by teaching. Mr. E. N. Buxton, Chairman of the London School statement by Board, in his opening address to that body, October 4, Buxton 1883, drew a dismal picture of the failure of the Education Chairman of Act of 1870. Among other sad examples he quotes — school " The School Management Committee lately had a Board, report in which an analysis was made of the mode of living of the parents whose children attend school in the metro- polis. In one, the scholars came from 313 families, and 182 of these families live in a single room. In the second school, the scholars came from 487 families, 400 of whom lived in one room. In a third school, the children came from 339 families, 289 of whom lived in one room." In his address to his constituents at Sheffield (December statement by 11, 1883), Drink in its Bearing upon Education, the Right Hon. Mr' Honourable Mr. Mundella, M.P., said — Mundeiiaon ariiik in its * The education of the wealthy is often, though in the very oppo- bearing upon site direction, almost as ineffectual as that of the poor. With birth ^ "^* '°"" and money, one or both, behind them, the young Farin toshes and Lord Verisophts have it all their own way with their tutors and pro- fessors ; at home, at school, at the university they are deferred to, flattered, and coached into what is deemed a gentlemanly education. The system fosters indolence, dissipation, and the concrete vices of selfishness, totally unfitting them for doing their part in this or any great work of reform. Yet it is as essential to the well-being of society that the education of the wealthy should be practical, serious, and broad as it is that the children of the poor should be properly fed, clothed, and cared for before they are put to books. " If I were called upon to name those within my knowledge who have ruined their prospects in life, who have lost good situations and have fallen from comparative care and competence to a state of degradation, they would not be the men belonging to the labouring class, following agricultural or mechanical pursuits ; but they would be men of a superior class, of good education — men who have enjoyed comfortable homes and good salaries, and who, in spite of all, have fallen victims to this abominable and frightful vice of drink." — Quotation from an address by Mr. Walter, M.P., proprietor of the Times, cited in Eev. Dr. Dawson Burns' Christendom and the Drink Curse (London, 1875). t See Chap. x. pp. 234-265. 400 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Poverty will never yield until drink is removed. Mr. Glad- stone on poverty, in the House of Commons, in 1843. " I^ow, here is a block containing 1082 families and 2153 children of school age ; mind, that excludes children below five years of age, and above thirteen. There are three schools in the block, two churches, three chapels, and forty-one public-houses. ISTow, what does that mean ? I want you just to think this out for a moment. For these 1082 families — wretched, poverty-stricken, miserable in all their surroundings — there are forty-one public- houses ! That means that every twenty-five of these wretched families have one public-house ! If you will carry it out for yourselves — that is to say, if you consider what it costs to maintain an average public-house in London, and consider what these twenty-five families must spend in drink to maintain it — you will form some idea of one of the greatest causes of this misery among our population. When Mr. Forster was passing his Education Bill, Mr. Bartley made an investigation, which showed that less than one penny per week per family in a square mile of the East of London was spent on education, and more than 4s. 3d. in drink. That means, in the whole of this area of wretchedness of a mile square, the education cost less than four shillings a year for the family, and the drink more than £11." Tet with all that England has done to relieve it, especially during the last forty years, we see this poverty not only not overcome, but steadily growing. Why ? Because those who see and seek to alleviate poverty do not first attack the root of the evil, drink. In chapters vii. and x., on moral and social results, it was explained at length how omnipotent a cau.se drink is, of all evils and of poverty with all its concomitants of misery. Forty years ago an agitation for the removal of poverty, very similar to the present, shook the whole of England. On the 13th of February, 1843, Mr. Gladstone said to the House of Commons : — " It is one of the most melancholy features in the social state of this country that we see, beyond the possibility of denial, that while there is at this moment a decrease in the consuming powers of the people, an increase of the pres- sure of privations and distress, there is at the same time a constant accumulation of wealth in the upper classes, an increase of luxuriousness of their habits and of their WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 401 means of enjoyment, which, however satisfactory it may be as affording evidence of the existence and abundance of one among the elements of national prosperity, yet adds bitterness to the reflections which are forced upon us by the distresses of the rest of our fellow-countrymen." To-day most radical measures are proposed even by the Lord Saiis- members of former cabinets, as well as by members of the bury'asug- , •/ STGStions lor present cabinet. Lord Salisbury, member of the Beacons- the aiievia- field cabinet, and present leader of the Conservative party, poverty as contributed to the National Bevieio (November, 1883), a made in the notable paper on Tiahourers' and Artisans^ Dwellings, in Review. which he advocates measures for the " housing of the November, poor," of a state-socialistic nature. The following is a fair digest of this article : — " The housing of the poor in our great towns, especially in London, is a much more difficult and much more urgent question, for the increase of prosperity tends rather to aggravate the existing evil than to lighten it. It is, in fact, directly caused by our prosperity. ... " Thousands of families have only a single room to dwell in, where they sleep and eat, multiply and die. Tor this miserable lodging they pay a price ranging from two shillings to five shillings a week — a larger rent, on the whole, than the agricultural labourer pays for a cottage and garden in the country. It is difficult to exaggei-ate the misery which such conditions of life must cause, or the impulse which they must give to vice. . . . These over- crowded centres of population are also centres of disease ; the successive discoveries of biologists tell us more and more clearly that there is in this matter an indissoluble partnership among all human beings breathing in the same vicinity. If the causes of disease were inanimate, no one would hesitate about employing advances of public money to render them innocuous. Why should the ex- penditure become illegitimate because these causes happen, to be human beings ? . . . The question remains whether more can be done by Parliament than has been done, and if so, in what direction ought it to move ? A more im- portant subject of inquiry could hardly be suggested; for it concerns, directly or indirectly, the well-being of hundreds of thousands. ... I see a statement in the newspapers that the Liberty and Property Defence League are prepar- 2d 402 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Mr. Cham- berlain on the same topic iu Fortnightly Review, December, 1883. ing to deivonnce any sucli interference as unsound in prin- ciple. If this account of their views is a true one, I think tliey have in this instance gone farther than sound reason- ing and the precedents of our legislation will justify. . . . This unhappy population has a special claim on any assist- ance that Parliament can give. The evil has in a great measure been created by Parliament itself. . . . Under these circumstances, it is no violation even of the most scrupulous principles to ask Parliament to give what relief it can. Laissez faire is an admirable doctrine, but it naust be applied on both sides." This shows how keenly alive Lord Salisbury is to the horrible condition of the poor in the city : how about those in the country ? But he has not a word to say of drink, the chief cause of it ; and, curiously enough, states that " the evil has been in a great measure created by Parliament itself." Mr. Joseph Chamberlain, President of the Board of Trade, contributed to the December number of the Fort- nightly Review (1883) an article on the Housiiig of the Poor, which is even more radical than Lord Salisbury's in its suggestions for the removal of poverty. It opens with this ominous paragraph — " Social reform is in the air. In the pages of this review able writers have for some time past endeavoured to impress on statesmen and politicians the urgency of social questions and the magnitude of the evils which have silently undermined the extraordinary show of outward prosperity on which we have been congratulating ourselves during the last thirty years. Never before in our history were wealth and the evidences of wealth so abundant ; never before was luxurious living so general and so wanton in its display ; and never before was the misery of the very poor more intense, or the conditions of their daily life more hopeless and more degraded. In the course of the last twenty years it is estimated that the annual income of the nation has increased by six hundred millions, but there are still nearly a million persons constantly in receipt of parish relief, and millions more are always on the verge of this necessity. The vast wealth which modern progress has created has run into ' pockets ; ' individuals and classes have grown rich beyond the dreams of avarice, and are WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 403 busying themselves in inventing methods of wasting the money which they are unable to enjoy. But the great majority of the ' toilers and spinners ' have derived no proportionate advantage from the prosperity Avhich they have helped to create, while a population equal to that of the whole metropolis has remained constantly in a state of abject destitution and misery. Is it wonderful that from time to time are heard murmurs of discontent and even of impatient anger ? What manner of men and women must these millions of paupers be if they can see without re- pining or resentment the complacent exhibition of opulence and case which is for ever flaunted in their faces, within a few hundred yards of the noisome courts and alleys in which they huddle for warmth and shelter, without a single comfort, and in hourly anxiety for the barest necessaries of life ? The cry of distress is as yet almost inarticulate, but it will not always remain so. The needs of the poor are gradually finding expression ; the measures proposed for their relief are coming under discussion. The wide circulation of sucb books as the ' Progress and. Poverty,' of Mr. Henry George, and the acceptance which his proposals have found among the working- classes, are facts full of significance and warning. If something be not done quickly to meet the growing necessities of the case, we may live to see theories as wild and methods as unjust as those suggested by the American economist adopted as the creed of no inconsiderable portion of the electorate." He also ignores drink as a chief agent in this misery, and suggests a principal remedy in these words : — " Let us go to the root of the matter, and state the principle on which alone a radical reform is possible. The expense of making towns habitable for the toilers ivho dwell in them must be thrown on the land lohicli their toil ^inakes valuable, and without any effort on the part of its owners. " When these owners, not satisfied with the unearned increment which the general pi'osperity of the country has created, obtain exorbitant returns from their investment by permitting arrangements which make their property a public nuisance and a public danger, the State is entitled to step in and to deprive them of the rights which they have abused, paying only such compensation as will fairly represent the worth of their property fairly used." 404 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Pangers from sup- planting moral im- petus by mere political agitation. Earl Shaftes- bury on the mischief of State aid, Nineteenth Centurt/, December, 1S83. Earl Shaftes- bury's state- ment that "It is im- possible, absolutely impossible, to du unytLiug If legislation could remove poverty, Mr. Clinmberlain's remedy would doubtless go far towards doing so ; but if this matter be left to legislation only, or chiefly, i.e., if the question of poverty is made principally a political one, and therefore through political interests and reasons introdiTced into Parliament — instead of being brought there by force of the earnest, calm, intelligent expression of the popular will, because it is known and felt that the solution of the poverty problem is of paramount importance to the welfare of the whole nation — it is too likely to meet with the same fate which has befallen other great moral measures when dealt with from a chiefly political point of view. Earl Shaftesbury, in his part. The Mischief of State Aid, in the symposium on poverty and its remedies (Nineteenth Century, December, 1883), admirably points this fact in these words : " If the State is to be summoned not only to provide houses for the labouring classes, but also to supply such dwellings at nominal rents, it will, while doing something on behalf of their physical condition, utterly destroy their moral energies. The State is bound in a case such as this to give every facility by law and enabling statutes,* but the "work itself should be founded and proceed on voluntary effort, for which there is in the country an adequate amount of "wealth, zeal, and intelligence. . . . Were a central committee formed in the city of London, consisting of gentlemen of power, wealth, and influence, who would undertake to organize such a movement, form local com- mittees (for local committees there must be in the several districts), and issue an appeal, there would be in the present day, few can doubt it, a ready and ample response. These gentlemen would determine how far they could proceed without new legislation ; though additional laws, if required at all, would be required rather for the completion than for the commencement of the work. The powers ah-eady in existence should be called into operation. They are far greater than most people are aware of." These are invaluable suggestions, but, as Earl Shaftes- bury himself told me, " It is impossible, absolutely impos- sible, to do anything to permanently or considerably relieve this poverty, until we have got rid of the curse of drink." * Enabling Statutes, 14 and 15 Vict. chap. 34 of 1851. WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 405 And towards this end a report from such committees as toperma- Lord Shaftesbury suggests, would undoubtedly accomplish consilerabi much . relieve The very removal of drink would make it physically Sntu'^'imve impossible for the poor to sink so low as they now do, got rid of the because it is only by means of the deadening, narcotizing driuk." eifects that drink exercises on body and soul, that human beings can be brought to endure the lowest kinds of degradation. Without the benumbing influence of drink, many would awaken to their degraded condition, and this awakening would enable poor relief committees to do most beneficent and effective work. For example, a Working Woman, in the column on The a working London Poor {Daily News, December 1, 1883), suggests the letter, sug- establishment of " A Labour Registry Office, conducted by ^'^'j'J-^J'^^ Government or a company, where information might be mentofa obtained as to every kind of labourer, mechanic, or clerk Labour™^"' required. To be effectual, it should of course be necessary Registry to have these offices in nil parts of the country, connected ^rews, "* ^ perhaps with the post-office or workmen's clubs ; they could December, be applied to by letter or personally. A certificate or recommendation from the last employer should be made a sine qua non ; thus enabling all good workmen to obtain employment, which is far from being the case now. It seems to me that the matter is worth a trial, especially as a successful instance is before us of a domestic servants' agency. At this establishment no servant is put on the list until a form has been sent to the former master or mistress, which they are desii^ed to fill up as to the character of the servant applying for a place. This, if conscientiously filled up, is a great deterrent to character- less servants from applying." Another remedy, which Government, and such poor Suggestion relief committees as Earl Shaftesbury suggests, might estabi*ish- co-operate in effecting, consists in the establishment of sober >^''"t of working men's banks,* where those deemed by a proper ing men's ' reliefbanks. * A most valuable suggestion as to the formation and conduct of working men's banks is given in Mr. L. O. Smith's Open Letter to the Lahourers of Sweden (Stockholm, 1883). This letter is, as a whole, so rich in j)ractical suggestions, that if translated and sown broad- cast over Great Britain, it would do much to produce in working 406 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. board of judges fit recipients of pecuniary aid, should obtain it free of interest, and on the understanding tliat it was left to their honour to return such sums when able to do so. But no drinking person should be entitled to such aid, simply on the ground of his unreliability, and the probability that the money would go to tlie publican rather than to the improvement of his own condition. Special arrangements encouraging the deposit of savings, with a view to the support of widows and children of sober working-men, might be made in these banks ; and a special department could be pro\'ided for the deposit of savings from drink, which could be promoted by many carefully considered regulations ; such, for instance, as the surety that when the total amount of deposit of this character — representing moral growth through resistance to tempta- tion — should have reached a certain figure, it should be augmented by a liberal gift, and a similar gift follow upon a future specified increase ; so that reformed drinkers would be strengthened in their reformation, not only by knowing that something was safe for a rainy day, for accident, for illness, or for some good enterprise for better- ing their condition, but that in case of their death their wives and children would be provided for. If the aristocracy and the wealth of London would establish and maintain an adequate institution of this kind, the expense to them individually would be trifling in proportion to their means, while the return in the diminution of poor taxes, and in the imperishable wealth of doing good, would be very great ; and, a still more vital point, they would lessen the gross total of wrong which saturates civilization, retarding human progress in the proportion of the existing amount of ill. There are links between the den and the palace, ties between the millionnaire and the beggar, the A'irtuous and the wicked. Generally there exists a constant gradation between these conditions, at times there is a sudden trans- position from the one to the other ; the connecting pro- cesses are usually invisible, but they are none the less real, and work out the results with terrible certainty and accuracy. men's minds an intelligent notion of how to improve their whole economic, moral, social, and political position. WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 407 If England continue practically to ignore, or condone and minimize the drink evil as the root of poverty, infamy, and crime, she will reap the frnits of this error. Only with the solution of this problem will real goodness, with the happiness and peace they engender, come into those hearts and homes where wealth and luxury now only emphasize the unrest, the hollowness, and the hardness of their prosperous inmates. Contrasting the scenes in the London slums with the ^'^'■- ^'■^"?j^ splendour and lavish luxury of London's wealthy homes, responsi- Mr. Francis Peek (Social Wreckage, London, 1883) says, Snlhe^ "How startling the contrast between the magnificence question of there and the sordid destitution here ; between these fair, ^^^^^''^ '^"'' richly clad, attractive women and those hideous human beings of the same sex, who sit shivering in rags and grimed with dirt ! Is it asked who is responsible for such a contrast ? Surely every indolent man or woman, who, living in ease and plenty, leaves things to take their chance under the excuse of business for want of power, but really with the unexpressed plea of Cain, ' Am I my brother's keeper ? ' " Retribution is the law of the universe. If we allow our brothers and sisters to drag out their existence in degTadation, pauperism, and crime, a time will come, even in this world, when selfishness, pride, and indolence will bring their bitter reward. If the Christian teaching of brotherhood be ignoi'cd, the words ' liberty, fraternity, equality ' may once more become a battle-cry of revenge from those to whom the acknowledgment of their fraternity has been denied. Every Englishman, every Englishwoman, can do something, and they who decline to work in the cause of the poor, fail not less in their duty to their country and to their God." I am impelled to repeat that if this problem of poverty is left to legislation only, it will in the first instance be most probably long delayed, while the royal commission gathers evidence, and much time will be wasted in con- troversy and fencing over the report, with danger of its being ultimately shelved or rendered inoperative ; other measures more suitable for legislation, and for that reason more practicable, will be deferred, and when the longed- for legislation does come, it will hardly, as the saying 408 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. goes, be worth the caudle. Parliamentary effectiveness is well summed up in the ancient threadbare hexameter : " Parturiunt montes nascitur ridicnlus mus." Generally speaking, legislation is satisfactory only in the degree that a minimum of private and. corpoi-ate interest is at stake, and as very large individual interests are in manifold ways concerned in any legislation for poor- maintenance by the State, it seems sang'uine to expect very much directly from the present movement. I wish, however, not to be understood, as saying or meaning that the State has no responsibilities or power to do much towards the alleviation of such suffering as the press of England is now discussing ; nor would I, if I knew it, say anything to check the beneficeut warmth that has burst out toward the poverty-stricken. But it is surely well to remember that even the most excellent legislation, if not preceded by the necessary preparation for its application and reception, must largely become a failure. Legislation for poverty must more than any other be preceded by moral education and reform ; otherwise even the best legislation would only remove poverty, as we remove fruit from a tree, leaving behind all that will produce another harvest of the same. This fact was terribly and thoroughly illustrated iu the great French Revolution. The watchword of the Assembly was, " Let no one bring up in opposition the rights of property. The right of property cannot be the right to starve fellow-citizens. The fruits of the earth, like the air, belong to all men." Wages were determined by law, and bounties were created for the poor, nianqui on In speaking of this time the eminent French economist, oflcKbli'ltTve I^^^'^qiii? i^i liis History of Political Economy (Paris, 1860), measures SayS cure for* "All of wealth and felicity which philanthropic legis- poverty. lation could, decree was decreed, but the people found that public wealth followed other laws than those of compul- sion. Governments and individuals Avere forced to seek the elements of future greatness elsewhere than in mere legis- lative programmes ; " they found " that the finest laws are insufficient to secure to each citizen a prosperous WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 409 condition, unless he co-operates witli tliem in latoiir and morality." Laws, taen, are secondary considerations, proper con- individual ditions and proper men being the first requisites. It may J)Ji°y g'ta^Je*^ truly be said that ideal laws and institutions prematurely foundation secured, i.e., secured to people unfit to appreciate, enforce, ° P^'og^'^^s. and maintain them, result not only in swift and certain disasters, and in complications wlaich have a long evil evolution, but force realization of the ideal thus sought for to recede into a more distant future than the processes of wise approach would have made necessary. A scheme for the relief of poverty, which has within a few years taken great hold of the public mind, is that of land nationalization, i.e., the transfer of laud from indi- vidual to state ownership. (See p. 403.) It is of most ancient origin, having been practically applied by several of the great nations of antiquity. In modern times, during the French Revolution, it was tried with signal failure, when the Constituent Assembly of 1789 decided to put the whole burden of taxation on the land, except the property tax and custom duties. However monsti'ous and absurd the present scheme of Mr. Henry land nationalization may at first thought appear, it cannot ^c^°eme^of be denied that its idea is noble ; and further, it must be lapd nation- admitted that in theory this scheme, as advanced by Mr. curTfoT Henry George — in essence the same as the schemes of poverty. Stuart Mill and Herbert Spencer — is unassailable ; and were the elements and conditions of society ideal in them- selves and ideally adjusted, it would be practicable and a blessing. But the practical solution of the problem— in this case as in so many others — is quite different from the theoretical one. If we investigate the scheme of land nationalization to Jfeithertime, see what are the possibilities for its becoming a blessing, Jj°° pe'opie we are faced at the outset with conditions most unfit prepared and people most unripe for so profound an experi- ment. No one who understands human character expects that the landed proprietors would yield up their lands merely because of a popular demand. Holders of the land, they hold the power, and, holding the power, can defy public opinion. A revolution, therefore, would be required, a 410 THE FOUXDATIOX OF DEATH. terrible and bloodj revolution for dispossessing the land- lord. History has shown that it is not the truest, most un- selfish, and wise men who lead revolutions, but rather those who can vie with and surpass the masses in inflamed counsel, in passion, in uni'eflecting hardiliood, brutality, and crimes. And, after a successful revolution, what then? In the stead of experienced and reflecting, if ofttimes hard and selfish, governments, we should find an ignoi'ant, selfish, bigoted populace, fi-enzied and seething under the new tyrants, self-substituted for the former masters ? And if the revolutionists had been unanimous in their vengeance upon the holders of land, where would this unanimity be when it came to the division of the spoils ? Violence, arrogance, greed, these are the motives which actuate and appeal to the masses in excited times, and these would naturally be the characteristics of those who, having led the revolution, would next assume leadership in shaping the new order of things. And these certainly are not the men most qualified to reconstitute humanity upon a basis of liberty, equality, and fraternity, or fitted to recast the whole mould of social life in a harmonious correspondence with these principles. The wolf is not the fitting guardian of the sheepfold, nor is the coarse, brutal, successful revolutionist the right agent to manage the affairs of the helpless. Again, such a reconstruction as is implied by land nationalization would require years and years of peace and tranquillity for its realization. It would require not only the wisest, fii'mest, and largest harmonious council of men, but also the most unselfish, the most consistently self- abnegating. Where are these men to be found ? Where is that great body of ofiicials who in the development and manage- ment of this subversive experiment would need, and indeed could have, no check upon their activity, but that of their conscientiousness ? There is not enough individual unselfishness — cultivated and practical unselfishness — in the whole range of humanity covered under the Avord civilization to stock one county or state with enough religion, pure and undefiled, enough WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 411 of neighbonrlmess sucli as the Master taught, to make the land nationalization experiment other than dangerously revolutionary, and one whose worst effects would be suffered by its noblest iipholders. Where is the nation, the people, ready to accept all the risks, adversities, and innumerable calamities certain to accompany so stupendous a reconstruction of state and society, and go on waiting for an indefinite period, patiently for the outcome ? Until man has been regenerated, thorough-going schemes which involve a general levelling of social and economic inequalities and distinctions must be premature, and there- fore the land nationalization as now proposed is out of the question ; selfishness cannot be permanently trusted to guard against selfish and administer unselfish decrees. The founda- And the foundation of any individual or national regene- indMduaf ration must be laid in temperance. or national This truth was inculcated and emphasized in the first must be laid plea made by the founder of the modern English Temper- »« temper- ance movement, Mr. Joseph Livesay (The Moral Reformer, July 1, 1831), in these words : " While drinking contimies, poverty and vice will prevail, and until this is abandoned no regulations, no efforts, no authority under heaven, can raise the condition of the icorhing classes." Figures speak loudly and clearly on this point. In round numbers the total rents in the United Kingdom annually for farms is £60,000,000, and for houses, £70,000,000, and the cost of the drink traffic, as we saw in chap, x., far exceeds both these sums put together. And when we remember that the increase or decrease Suggestions of this enormous drink bill has depended chiefly upon might^e" opportunity, that it has increased with the increase of expected, prosperity and decreased with the decrease of prosperity, it land nation- seems verv clear which reform, drink or land nationaliza- ^J.'^'^VJ'? J. . . . __^ should be tion, is of paramount importance to the nation. For accomplished were land nationalization realized without temperance, tempwance the enormously widened opportunity for drink would reform, soon show, in overflowing lists of poverty, insanity, and crime, how idle must all schemes of reform be which are not based, in the first instance, on the self-control of the individual, the very powder which drink most fatally destroys. 412 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Commenting on the appalling Blade List of drink criminality occurring in Eiigland during the last week of 1883 and the first week of 1884, and summarized in the Alliance News, the Grimsby News says — " Mr. Henry George is going up and down lectviring about 'Progress and Poverty,' and telling us that all the evils from which we suffer may be directly or indirectly traced to our land laws. Surely, even Mr. Geo7-ge must see that no reform in land laws can do much for a nation that permits itself to be demoralized in this way by the traffic in strong drink. We spend twice as much on drink as on rent, and the results are before us in this blackest of black lists. Talk of our people now being able to enjoy them- selves ' I'ationally ; ' how cau this be affirmed so long as in two short weeks we produce results like these in our towns and cities ? Some one has said that so long as we drink bitter ale, our cities must send up their ' Bitter Cry,' and we believe this is the sober truth. The other day Mr. Chamberlain told the shipowners of this country that the present loss of life among our seamen could not be any longer allowed to go on, and that Parliament must take decided action. It is high time that some one said the same thing about the loss of life and character and pro- sperity through the driuk traffic. The fact is, we are as a nation thoroughly demoralized by this bloated interest." It is not easy to picture what the condition of this nation would be wei'e the scheme of laud nationalization to be accomplished without having been preceded by thorough temperance reform and that establishment of individual self-control, of sanity of mind and conscience inseparable from true temperance reform. The results likely to spring from those ample opportunities for un- limited supplies of drink, which the prosperity promised to the individual by the land nationalization scheme would afford, may be 2)artly understood from a considei'a- tion of the scenes described in our papers and journals as occurring at Brighton beach, early in 1884. I quote the following from the Evening Standard (February 7, 1884) : — The Evening " The disgusting sccnes which took place near Brighton, descT^ption consequent upon some casks of beer and spirits from the oitiie scenes ill-fatcd Simla being washed ashore, are enough to excite casksthrown wondor as to how much a man is, even in the nineteenth WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 413 century, tlie superior of tlie beasts. It is a humiliating ashore from fact that there is a considerable portion of the population on^jfr^j^'^on who, if given free access to intoxicants, will drink until beach.° they fall insensible. The crowd on the beach near Brighton fell upon the casks like wild beasts, numbers became in- toxicated, many would have been di'owned had not the coastguard dragged them beyond the reach of the advancing tide, several had the narrowest of escapes of death from the quantity of spirits they had swallowed, and one man actually died. It would seem, then, that it is from no consideration of decency, morality, or self-respect that a vast number of men are restrained from drinking to a point of intoxication, but that it is simply a question of expense. Given free liquor, and a mad debauch is in- dulged in. Such a fact as this seems to show that all our boasted advances, all the moral benefits of an extending education, all the conventional restraints of society are but surface deep, and that, given temptation — that is, liquor without having to pay for it — a disgusting carouse, which would disgrace the dwellers on a savage island, is the result." Unfortunately, this record by no means stands alone, similar The Wet/mouth and Portland Guardian, in relating the iow"ing^the scenes which followed upon the rescue of the cargo of the rescue of the Royal Adelaide, wrecked in the winter of 1872, says: wrecked "Amongst the cargo of the Royal Adelaide were a large ^j'f^-j number of casks and bottles of spirits, and these, with the rest of the cargo, have been constantly coming ashore. At the time of the rescue of the passengers and crew there were a number of fishermen and others who exerted them- selves nobly, worked most iudefatigably, and deserved the highest praise. When, therefore, the wreckage began coming ashore, some spirit casks were broken open for the refreshment of the men. The coastguardsmen and others, too, remained in charge of the salved goods during the whole of Monday night. . . . What was our astonishment, on visiting the beach next morning, to find that not only did the wreck of the vessel present a very melancholy aspect, but that there was a much more appalling and heart-sickening sight on the beach, viz., men lying about in all directions in a state of the most beastly intoxication. . . . Men were found lying insensible beside a cask o£ 414 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Mr. Joseph Cowen on the para- mount im- portance of BObriety. Dr. Chan- ning on the reforming power of innocent pleasures and amuse- ments. spirits, or with flasks, bottles, and other vessels beneath them. In the vicinity of two or three casks there were two men lying head to head in this condition. The first fatal case was that of a lad employed as errand boy by a Weymouth grocer. Then we heard of a man named Smith, who was not expected to live another hour. On proceeding to the Ferry Bridge, we saw two men, one of whom was just brought from the beach insensible and died immediately, and the other of whom had been lying in a state of insensibility for upwards of three hours." And the Temperance Record (December 7, 1872), in an article on Drinking Disasters and ShipwrecJcs, says : " On the Irish coast, after the recent wreck of the Kinsdale, upwards of eighty men were lying in a state of stupor from the horrible effects of the drink extracted from a hundred and fifty barrels of ale that had been wa.shed ashore." How true are Richard Cobden's w^ords, that " the temperance cause lies at the foundation of all social and political reform " ! As Mr. Joseph Cowen, M.P., said, when addressing a Blue Ribbon meeting at Newcastle-on-Tyne (January 19), " Neither franchises nor education nor social transforma- tions will, of themselves, keep people sober ; and sohriety must precede all moral, mental, and political reformation, if that reformation is to be real." * § 94. There is a great lack of innocent and cheap amusement for the masses, and a fatal plenty of cheap amusements which are not innocent. " Innocent pleasure," says Dr. Channing (op. ciY.), " has not been sufiiciently insisted on. ... A people should be guarded against temptation to unlawful pleasures by furnish- ing the means of innocent ones, such as produce a cheerful frame of mind, such as refresh instead of exhausting the system, such as recur frequently rather than continue long, such as send us back to our daily duties invigorated in body and mind. . . . Such as we can enjoy in the presence and society of respectable friends ; such as are chastened with self-i'espcct, and accompanied with the consciousness that life has a higher end than to be amused. ... In every community there must be pleasures and relaxations and * Report in Qood Templar's Watchword, February 4, 1884. WHAT CAX BE DONE ? 415 means of agreeable excitement, and if innocent ones are not furnished, resort will be had to criminal. Man was made to enjoy as well as to labour, and the state of society should be adapted to this principle of human nature." He speaks earnestly of the humanizing power of music,* The power its influence in homes and in public assemblies, to protect oif the stage from the vice of drink and its kindred dissipations. Of Jj'ir|,gJiQjj the stage, he says, " The drama answers a high purpose when it places us in the presence of the most solemn and striking events of human history, and lays bare to us the human heart in its most powerful, appalling, and glorious woi'kings." A play of this kind, which occupied with an almost '^'\®™^™^^ unexampled success the boards of the Princess's Theatre, influence London, for a year (1883), is the Stive?- King, a modern pri'^cess's melodrama much in advance of recent popular works of Theatre this class. In this play, Mr. Wilson Barrett, probably the malTagement best living representative of the higher moral purposes ofMr.Wiisoa and poetic possibilities of dramatic art, powerfully portrays the story of a man Avho drinks away his chances and pro- spects, the peace of his young wife, and the livelihood of his childi'en, while he is yet young. But he is brought to bay by the occurrence of a murder of which he is innocent, but which he supposes himself to have committed while in a di'unken frenzy. His dreadful situation and the shame and anguish he has brought upon his faithful wife and little ones com- pletely sober him. Another clever turn in the plot, by which he is supposed to have perished in a burning car while fleeing from justice, gives him the opportunity to * At the invitation of Mrs. EUicott, a meeting of the Popalar Ballad Concert Committee was held on Saturday, in the drawing-room of No. 35, Great Cumberland Place, Hyde Park. The Bishop of Gloucester and Bristol presided. Mrs. Ernest Hart, the honorary eecretary, gave an account of the movement, and spoke of the success- ful formation of choral classes, in which the students were all young men and women working in shops and factories. Lord Brabazon, Sir Julius Benedict, Mr. Samuel Morley, M.P., Mr. Edmund Gurney, Mr. Horsfall, Dr. Norman Kerr, and others spoke in support of resolutions commending the objects of the society to general support. — Temperance Record (April, 1883). And the Saturday concerts in Exeter Hall, under the management of the National Temperance League, during this and last winter, have done much to wean the working people of London from the public-house. 416 THE FOUXDATIOX OF DEATH. repent and reform, of which he avails himself. In the scenes which portray the moral descent, the abrupt shock, and the moral recovery, there is a forceful illustration of the impossibility of worthy character not based on self- control and just regard to the rights of others ; and there is preached a painfully impressive yet hopeful sermon on the curse of drink. The men who write, the artists who present such a play, do a distinct and signal service to humanity. Another play called Drinlc (an adaptation by the late Mr. Charles Reade, of L'Assommoir), as presented at the Adelphi, London, with Charles Warner in the leading role, pictured the career of this vice in making total wreck of the mental, moral, and physical qualities of the hero in a manner almost too terrible to contemplate. The lesson and the warning conveyed in this play would, perhaps, be less deterrent to those in sorest need of such admonition, the very hopelessness of the total impression being calculated rather to palsy than to spur the flagging will and limp moral impulse characteristic of the victims of this vice. But to those not yet come under its thrall, the spectacle is one to withhold them even from the verge of danger. That many witnesses of both these plays, sought merely for sensation, and carried nothing away with them beyond the satisfaction of the moment, or went from them to public-houses to drink in mockery or bravado, or to dull uncomfortable flutterings of conscience and reason, does not alter the fact that good lessons were taught, and most efFectively illustrated, to a large majority capable of appreciating and remembering them. But this question of healthy amusement, and elevating recreation does not stop with music and the drama. Human ingenuity has by no means exhausted itself ; hardly can it be said to have as yet really taxed itself in the provision of amusements which inspire and recreate as well as please. In this direction most effective and blessed work against the evil of drink can and ought to be done.* * Addressing Parliament in April, 1866, Mr. J. A. Roebnck, M.P., said, " You close the picture-galleries and museums on holidays and feast days, but you leave wide open the gin-shop and the beer-shop ; WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 417 In his address to the schools at Liverpool (January 26, The late 1884), the late Duke of Albany said, " I shall be glad to $"^/„fon say a few words here about the pleasures of the poor and the duty of the part that the rich may fitly take in providing them, proviang^ For I believe that there are some persons — not careless pleasure for or unkind persons only, but what may be called profes- ^ ^°°'^' sional philanthropists — who hold that any attempt to provide the poor with music, flowers, and amusements, and the like, is merely foolish and sentimental, and that our duty to them lies only in the more serious region of educa- tion, religion, and so on. This is a point of view which I can never quite understand. I cannot understand how a vian can feel himself so separate from his fellotv -creatures as to think that the pleasures ivhich are quite worth his attention in his oiun case can become mere superfluotis trivialities in the case of the poor men and wom^en and children ivho have so few pleasures in all their lives'^ " One of the most valuable of the reports on Intemper- The ve!«- ance," says the Newcastle Chronicle (November 23, 1880), chronicle " is that of nearly forty years ago of a House of Commons ^"J^n p[°' Committee, and it suggested the multiplication of free amusements libraries, of free parks, of public museums, and of allied on drink'and institutions ; and though these may be costly to the nation, crime, they are less costly and less burdensome to the ratepayer than that appalling amount of drunkenness which feeds crime and staggers the imagination to reahze its horrible extent and effect. The beat of the wings of this destroy- ing angel are now on the air, and, as in Egypt of old, we may have the result that there is not a house where there is not one as dead thi-ough this vice." § 95. Irrespective of state and society generally, there The great are several public bodies whose influence greatly affects this bimy"*' evil of drink. One such body consists of the local magis- J^r.^Jjlf^^j^g" trates who issue the annual liquor licenses. This body is physicians,' vested with great authority, and could accomplish much creJgyfin if imbued with an earnest patriotism and desire to do their regard to part in diminishing the drink curse, and that the public evii.'^'" would support them in efforts at reducing the number of licensed public-houses seems probable from the steadily hating convivial meetings, you make the people unsocial drunkards. The gin-shop you love, because it increases your revenue." 2 E 418 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. increasing number of petitions from various counties to Parliament for local option or other means restricting tlie liquor trade, and from boroughs to magistrates for reduc- tion of licenses. Last year offered a conspicuous example of public sympathy with such measures. The magistrates of Rother- ham, Avho refused to renew a number of off-licenses in that borough, were by an overwhelming majority supported in their decision in a meeting called to censure their action. Then there are two great pi'ofessional bodies upon whom we might almost say it ultimately depends whether this drink evil shall be utterly conquered, i.e., the physicians and the clergy. The physician's prescription extends over the life of man from conception to the grave. If the physicians, as a body, persist in using alcoholic medicines, and as long as they do so, we may be able to check or considerably diminish it, but uproot it — never ! But the physicians, as we have seen, are rapidly be- coming unanimous, both in opinion and practice, that alcohol under nearly all circumstances is hurtful to organic life, and it is a happy omen that a great many of the voung students of medicine are total abstainers. The re- Just as the State is largely interested in the success of of°heCburch *^^ bquor traffic because of the revenues it brings in, so also in regard to is the Church, materially speaking, even more concerned " " ^" ' than the State in this traffic, because of contributions, tithes, educational and religious endowments, by dealers, and because of large ownership in public-house property. In the days when this relation of things was first estab- lished, drink, as we know, was regarded as a legitimate and rational exhilaration of the senses ; it was even called that "good creature of God," and coupled with His Word in the phrase " Beer and the Bible." This notion, though not dissipated everywhere even yet,* has been vigorously pushed from its vantage in the centre of general acceptance by the broad, shoulders of Progress, the knowledge now universal, whether welcome * The Alliance News (November 24., 1883) reports Mr. H. E. Edwards as saying, in an address to a conference of licensed victuallers in Birmingham, November 7, " It used to be ' Beer and the Bible.' Now the Church says, ' Kick the beer-barrel away.' The beer- barrel, however, will stand as long as the Church." tbe drink evil WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 419 or not, that alcoliol is always poison to body and mind, and even especially to the latter. Thus no alternative is left open to the Church but that of severing itself from all association with it, and it must be admitted that it has set bravely to work to do this. When the modern temperance movement first began to The origin obtain hold of the public heart of England, the Church oniJchurcii opposed it strenuously, and the bitterness against it may of England 1 -T, 1 11-j i-nj_ 1 XI -n Ti temperance be said to have reached its height when the iiivangeiical movement. Alhance of Edinburgh proposed, in 1847, as subjects for discussion — " How far the study of physical facts led to infidelity, and the connection betwixt teetotalism and in- fidelity." In 1862, some two hundred clergymen, headed by Canon Henry J. Ellison, initiated a church temperance movement, which, chiefly owing to the devotion, enthu- siasm, tact, and capacity of Canon Ellison, has strengthened and spread until now it virtually embraces the largest portion of the Church of England. Of this movement, known as the Church of England Temperance Society, the Queen is patron, the Archbishop of Canterbury is president ; all the bishops are enrolled under its banners, and Canon Ellison is still its chairman. When called before the Lord's Committee in 1880, Canon Ellison said — "I call your lordships' attention to the prayer of The earnest '' i II- ,1 n p j_t • appeal, in trie 14,000 clergy, from whom i believe the call tor this com- name of the mittee originated. In their memorial to the bishops they ^^^y^^l^ ask this : ' We, the undersigned, clergy of the Church of Temperance England, venture respectfully to appeal to your lordships, the'LcTrd's as the only members of our order in Parliament, as such. Committee most earnestly to support measures of the further restric- canon Henry tion of the trade in intoxicating liquors in this country. ^j^j^-maiTof We ai'e convinced, most of us, from an intimate acquaint- the society, ance with the people, extending over many years, that [egisu^tlonla their condition can never be greatly improved, whether favour of intellectually, physically, or religiously, so long as in- ^™p^'''^°'=*- temperance extensively prevails among them ; and that intemperance will prevail so long as temptations to it abound on every side.' I cannot help saying that seeing that the excessive drinking of this country now is of such a wholesale character, and has its roots so very deeply in the habits of the population, you must attack it upon 420 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Archbishop Benson's position re- garding temperance reform. every side. We believe it is like a great fortress — it must be attacked by investment, by mine, by sap, and by direct attack ; but whatever other agencies may be used, the strong conviction of all those who, like myself, have been engaged in parochial temperance work for many years, is, that we can do very little without the assistance of the legislature ; that so long (as this memorial says) as the temptations exist to the extent that they do exist now, we shall scarcely be able to make any impression upon the intemperance of the country." When the present president was the Archbishop- Designate, he wrote from Truro (January 13, 1883), that he would " gladly and anxiously use any opportunities which the new position to which God has called him in the Church may give him to promote by legislation and other means the cause of tempei'ance in this country." And now, in the beginning of the second year of his great responsibilities as the Primate of all England, he has preached a temperance gospel which will make the record of his archiepiscopate grow ever brighter in the widening light of man's advancement, as the years of reform and pi'Ogress come gathering in with their blessings of en- lightenment to the generations we work and hope for, but shall not see in the flesh. On the occasion of the annual meeting of the Church of England Temperance Society, held at Lambeth Palace, April 29, 1884, he said — " All England is caring about the housing of the poor of London and the great towns, and must do its utmost to put the poor into decent dwellings. But then, ladies and gentlemen, what good will this have done if you have not taught the people to abstain from drink ? To go in for housing the poor properly is a pressing duty, but with all the cleanliness and regulation that you introduce you know it will be in vain unless yoa can teach the people to keep themselves tempei'ate. Do not let us be content with sweeping and garnishing the house. We have it upon our Lord's word what that comes to when it is done by itself. We must get a good spirit into the house if we wish the seven spirits not to come back — spirits of evil in sevenfold force, remember, and much moi'e wicked than the first. It w'ould be but sweeping and garnishing if we clean and clear and rebuild those houses, and do not teach the people WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 421 to be sober. . . . Tn no past time had the preachers of the gospel to contend with the demon of drink as tbej hav^e in this age of ours. To accept the gospel, to live con- scientiously under the precepts of the gospel, to be fol- lowers of Christ, to be built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, and to drink ! The two things cannot co-exist. We must drive out the spirit of drink by the Spirit of the gospel. Veiled or unveiled, drink must be driven out, or else we have what we may call whole countries and whole regions inaccessible to the word of truth." * On the 19th of November, 1883, the Church of England Temperance Society celebrated its twenty-first anniversary, and the sermon delivered by Canon Farrar in Westminster Abbey, if indicating the real spirit of the Church on the subject of temperance, shows that this society has nobly understood its mission. In calling for funds for the labours of the coming year, the society thus explains its purpose : — " To send into every diocese a resident and efficient Thepur- . . •' poses and organizing agent. mission of " To carry on the rescue work of the society by earnest, pf®j?'^"^J|j devoted police-court missionaries. Temperance " To establish army, naval, workshop, servants', and ^°'^'*'y- cabmen's branches. " To prosecute the work of the branch in connection with the missions to seamen society. " To supply tracts, leaflets, and publications for general circulation. " To send gratuitously to clubs, schools, institutions, and colleges, copies of the weekly Chronicle. " To assist in providing coffee and cocoa stalls and barrows, ninety of which have been sent out. " To aid in the introduction of temperance teaching into colleges and schools. " To promote wise and remedial legislation as embodied in the society's proposed bill. " To form diocesan, parochial, and juvenile branch societies. " To send outfit and competent deputations (clerical * Temperance Record, May 1, 1884. 422 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. The Bishop of Carlisle on the success of the labours of this (society (St. James's Hall, No- vember 20, lbS3). Canon Basil Wilbirforce in deiiuucia- tion of and lay), and generally to extend the objects of the society by moral, social, and educational means." At the society's breakfast the next morning (November 20, 1883), in St. James's Hall, the Bishop of Carlisle, in alluding to the activity of the Church in the directions of relief and education, said — " It would be in vain to attempt an enumeration of all the works now going on quietly in parishes under the direction of the clergy- — ^works of which the world knows nothing beyond the limits of the pai'ish. 1 will mention the works going on in one metropolitan parish, the report of which lies before me. (1) The whole machinery of confu'mation, including classes in which young and old are prepared ; (2) instruction classes, in which the Scrip- tures are taught and good books circulated ; (3) a provident club ; (4) working classes, in which the poor are taught habits of industry ; (5) parochial mission ; (6) a society for aid during illness ; (7) a society for \'isiting the poor and aiding their distress ; (8) a society for aiding church singing ; (9) guilds for men and old and young women, and promoting their religious welfare ; (10) mothers' meetings for the study of good books ; (11) dispensaries and aids for the sick ; (12) a society for district visitors and their meetings ; (13) meetings for school teachers and Sunday school teachers ; (14) ragged and night schools, and their sujDport ; (15) soup kitchen for the poor ; (16) societies for waifs and strajs, or children deserted by their parents; (17) working men's benefit societies; (18) multitudinous Christian charities supported by en- dowment or subscription ; (19) needlework society ; (20) penny banks ; (21) young men's friendly society for pro- moting wholesome amusement for Sunday evenings ; (22) juvenile guild — a branch of the same ; (23) a confraternity society for communicants ; (24) young men's friendly society ; (25) a branch of the C. E. T. S. ; (26) a society in aid of the propagation of the gospel. Such are the works going on quietly and unostentatiously in connection with one Church."* On every hand clergymen with the courage to speak and act in accordance with their convictions are coming to the front. Writing to the late Archbishop Tait of Cantei-- * Church of England Temperance Chronicle, November 21', 1883. WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 423 bury, in July, 1882, Canon Basil Wilberforce denounced cimrchpro- the holding by the Church of property in public-houses, f^'pl^i^i^^l^ Since then, in various places, public-houses belonging to houses. the Church have been closed. Says the Tempera?ice Record (November 8, 1883) — " A public-house of rather a low class, the Golden Practical ex- Lion, in Gravel Lane, Southwark, has lately been vacated the Ecciesi- by its tenant, and the Ecclesiastical Commissioners, to ^^\^^^^ Com- J •11 -i-i- . . . I . missioners whom the premises belong, m their desire to minimize their of their in- interest in public-house property, have let it for half the promo'tioVof rent offered by a firm of hrewers to Mr. Fegan, of the Boys' temperance Home, Southwark, who proposes to open it as a place of tiou {Tem- recreation for working boys in this densely crowded ^*''"".^*v[ district, so that it will become a boon instead of a pest vember 8, to the neighbourhood. The Golden Lion adjoins Mr. ^**^^- Fegan's Home, and is now being rapidly prepared for its new career." The Dean of Westminster recently told me that he had closed and pulled down a public-house in Westminster. The most important and most difficult question which The question confronts the Church is that of the use of wine in the ^^^ine^aUie* Lord's Supper. Numbers of clergymen have, in obedience Lord's to their convictions, introduced into this rite in their own "PP*^""' churches the use of non-intoxicating instead of intoxicating wine. I have been told that the Bishop of London grants absolute freedom to the clergy of his diocese as to the character of the wine used in the Communion. In the Convocations of Canterbury last July (1883) the subject came up for decision. An appeal was made from the Lower House " praying " The decision that the Upper House should " take stich measures as they IIq^^q ii/th" may deem best for checking such innovation " (of using Convocations unfermented wine in the Lord's Supper). In the answer bury, July, we read, " This House is of opinion that agitation of any ^^^'■^■ question on so sacred a subject is much to be deprecated, as tending to distress many religious persons, to unsettle the weak, and even to lead to schism ; that it is quite unnecessary to raise the question referred to in the gravamen, inasmuch as the Church, though always in- sisting on the use of wine in the Holy Communion, has never prescribed the strength or weakness of the wine to be used, and, consequently, it is always possible to deal 424 THE FOUNDATIOX OF DEATH. Modern dis- coveries — as to the nature and effects of alcoliol — leave no alternative to the conscientious clergj'man. with, even extreme cases without departing from the custom observed bj the Church ; and that it is, there- fore, most convenient that the clei-gy should conform to ancient and unbroken usage, and should discountenance all attempts to deviate from it " (Chronicle of Convocation, 1883).* Thus the representative body of the Church of England, though deprecating agitation on the subject of the use of unfermented wine, does not positively condemn it. This is a great step, because this issue, once having become debatable, there can be no doubt as to its ultimate settle- ment. Both iutoxicating and unfermented wines were used by the Jews in the time of Christ, but we possess no know- ledge whether the wine used by Jesus in the last supper was intoxicating or unfermented. The best Hebrew authorities, living and past, either regard intoxicating or unfermented wines as equally lawful in Passover, or lean in the direction of the unfermented, inasmuch as fermented (leavened) food was forbidden at Passover. Therefore either complete liberty as to the use of intoxicating or un- fermented wines at the Lord's Supper must be granted, or, to be consistent, the use of wine at all must be abandoned. But aside from the question of the nature of the wine used by Jesus, modern discoveries as to the nature and effects of alcohol leave but one alternative in the use of wine to any conscientious clergyman. Jesus, when He took the cup and asked His disciples to drink in remembrance of Him, was the same Jesus who died on the cross that He might save sinners, was the same Nazarene who, in His own prayer, teaches His disciples, '^ Lead us not into temptation," who, in His agony in the garden, begged His disciples to watch and pray against temptation ; was the same Jesus who sternly told His disciples that it was better for a man to pluck out his eye or cut off his hand rather than that his whole body should he cast into hell; was the same who said, " Woe unto the world because of off'ences, for it must needs he that offences come, bid woe to that man by whom the off'ence cometh." Would He who spake these things desire the use of intoxicating drink in sacramental commemoration of Him ? A writer in the Ciiurch Quarterly Ueview early last * See chapter xi., pp. 301, 302. WHAT CAX BE DONE? 425 year asserts tliat the belief in tlie efficacy of the sacrament will protect the believer from harm. What authority is there for such an assertion ? Has any promise been given anywhere in the Bible to that effect ? (And what imputa- tion on the character of this sacred rite lies in the mere suggestion that special divine intervention is essential to the safety of one participating in it !) Certainly, the saddest facts of almost daily experience disprove such assertions. To the reformed drunkard, alcohol is like the taste of blood to the tamed lion or tiger. What shall be done for those innumerable ones, who, knowing their inherited predisposition to drink, can keep away from the public- house only so long as they do not approach the communion table ? As long ago as 1826, the Rev. Moses Stewart (Prof, of The Rev. Theology in Andover College, Mass., U.S.A.), in his Wines stewaiton and Stronq Drinks of the Ancient Hebreivs, arrived at the ^"^^^ ^^^^^- conclusion that " it is a matter of expediency and duty for qualification our churches not to admit members in the future except Membership on the gi'ound of total abstinence from the use of intoxi- cating liquors and from all traffic in them." The Rev. B. Parsons, in his Anti-Bacchus (London, The Rev. b. 1840), says, "We ought to substitute an innocent beverage thTcoifstaiit for the poison which is now used at the Lord's table. . . . '''^^^I'V Not long ago a reformed drunkard, and apparently a con- attendance at verted man, approached the Lord's table of a church which t^^k ""^"^ "* I could name ; mark the result. The wine tasted at the sacred Communion revived the old passion, and he, who seemed a saint, was corrupted by the sacramental wine, went home, got drunk, and died a drunkard." Mr. E. C. Delavan, in his Temperance Essays (New Mr. E. c. York, 1866), in Letter 11, Relative to Communion Wine, the use of" written in 1841, says, " Let us illustrate the sacrament of J,^^'^ ^^ ^'''^ the Supper by the water used in baptism. What Christian parent would be willing* to have such substances as com- pose the liquor generally used at the Supper mingled with the water with which his infant child is baptized ? Pure water is the only proper symbol of baptism. The pure blood of the grape, for the Supper." In the Concordance of Scripture and Science (London, Archdeacon 1847), Mr. Peter Burne, in speaking of the use of in- Bombay, °^ toxicants at the Communion, quotes the following remarks »" ti^e same. 426 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. The Lord Bishop of Kxeter on the same. <^anon AVilberforce on the same. made by Archdeacon Jeffreys, of Bombay : — "We agree to abstain from all intoxicating drinks, except in a religious ordinance, the plain interpretation of which is, that such mischievous liquors are too bad to be used anywhere but at the Lord's Supper. ... So long as intoxicating wine is dealt round at the communion table, the reclaimed drunkard (as well as anybody in danger of becoming one — who is sure ?) has of right no business there, for the sacred place is as morally unfit for him as the taproom and the gin palace . . . It is a mockery of God to pray for deliverance from evil and temptation while abandoning oneself to it with open eyes." The Lord Bishop of Exeter, who, in the Upper House of Convocations, seconded the above-quoted decision as to the use of wine in the Holy Eucharist, in an address at the Guildhall (October 17, 1883), said, "The temptations of the flesh are generally very strong, if they are near, and when such temptations were near to some men, their strength seemed to desert them altogether. The only thing they could do was to get away and keep away from such temptations altogether. Drunkards who had fallen under this particular temptation of the flesh must be, if they were to recover themselves at all, total abstainers." Does this mean that the very ones who stand in greatest need of the consolation and help of the most sacred religious rites shall be shtit out of it? Or does it mean that the form of the rite must be modified, to meet the need of those for whom it was first instituted ?* Canon Wilberforce answers these questions. Replying * Eev. James Smith, in liis work ou The Temperance Reformation and its claims upon the Christian Church (London, 1875), proposes : — " The general adoption of the pure juice of the grape," and thinks that it would be well " if the churclics could agree to adopt it both as appropriate in itself and as a protest against the intemperance that prevails." If the use of unfcrmonted grape juice, even as an ordinary beverage, could gradually replace the use of fermented liquors, it would possibly, more than any other purely physical agent except water, counteract and overcome the vitiated taste created by our long use of alcoholic drinks. There is, as far as I know, but one establishment in England where genuine unfermented wine is to be procured, and that is at Frank Wright's manufactory in South Kensington. It is claimed that some two thousand churches now use it. WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 42/ to the Rev. C. R. Chase, he remarked " that he had known terribly real and undoubted instances in which men, by partaking of wine from the sacramental cup, bad been started on their downward course to a dishonoured grave. If it came to be a question whether the wine or the Christian should be banished from the table of the Lord, he could not hesitate a moment as to which should go. From the sacramental table over which he had more immediate control intoxicating wine had now long been banished, and in this he believed they were carrying out the true spirit and meaning of the sacrament. If it was not a spiritual communion with the blessed Lord, beyond and above anything the mere elements could convey, then it failed in the gi-eat purpose for which it was ordained."* Will any one say that it is by Christ's command that various im- the Communion is used as the bulwark and the recruiting r^rtant con- office of the public-hoiTse ? "If good people can take involved in intoxicating drink at the communion table on Sunday," tfou *^"*^*" says the liquor seller, and all those who want a good excuse for drinking, " there can be no great harm in a glass at home, or even at the public-house." Surely this consideration alone ought to suffice to banish alcoholic di-ink from the sacrament. 'No doubt many clergymen and many Christians shrink with sincere piety from making any change in the sacra- mental rite, regarding it to have been taught and founded, as now observed, by the Master Himself ; but will not all personal shrinking, all minor scruples give way to the larger and holier shrinking which must accompany our knowledge, that alcohol is now proved to be a poison which ruins body and soul ? It cannot be inappropiate to say " minor scruples," since we are authoritatively assured that the Church " has never prescribed the strength or weakness of the wine to be used." If the Church does insist upon the custom of using alcoholic drink in the Communion, many, if not all, conscientious persons may be driven to abstain from the Lord's Supper, if not on their own account, lest offence come through them to others. Is it not better that " ancient and unbroken usage " in this respect should be deviated from, in order that the * League Journal, November, 3, 1883. 428 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. ancient and unbroken usas^e of sin maybe overcome, in tbe rite that remembers Him ? Dr. Chan- ning on drink customs. The origin and age of the drink Strutt on the same. § 96. The principal part for society to take in the battle against drink is the abolition of the drink customs. " In proportion as ardent spirits are banished from our houses, our tables, our hospitalities," said Dr. Channing (op. cit.), " in the proportion that those who have influence and authority in the community abstain themselves and lead their dependents to abstain from their use, the tempta- tions to drink must disappear. It is objected, I know, that if we give up what others will abuse, we must give up everything, because there is nothing which men will not abuse. I grant that it is not easy to define the limits at which concessions ought to stop. Were we called upon to relinquish an important comfort of life because others were perverting it into an instrument of crime and woe, we should be bound to pause and deliberate before we acted. " But no such plea can be set up in the case before us. Ardent spirits are not an important comfort and in no degree a necessity. They give no strength, they contribute nothing to help. They neither aid men to bear the burden nor discharge the duties of life." The drink customs are very difficult to eradicate. They have grown through the ages and become ingrained with the growth of national and social life and institutions, and in no country have they struck root so deeply as in England. History relates that the Danish conquerors punished with death any native who drank in their presence with- out permission. Some writers claim that the custom of pledging health originated at that time. Strutt, in bis Manners and Customs of Ancient Britain, says — " The meaning of a pledge was a security for the safety of the individual drinking, who all the time was exposed to the attack of an enemy by his arm being raised to his head, his face partly covered, and his body unprotected. When, therefore, a person was about to drink, he asked the guest next to him if he would pledge him, and being answered in the affirmative, the sword or dagger was raised to protect him while drinking." And this custom, sign of England's degradation under WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 429 the heel of her conqueror, not only was not dropped with the slavery that imposed it, but outlived it, and by some mysterious j)i"ocess got transposed into such a sign of glorification at both official and private banquets, that to omit it has until very recently been considered almost tantamount to treason to the throne and the altur of personal friendship ! There are many drink customs. At the Temperance Congress of 1862, a paper was issued enumerating four hundred drink laws and usages ; * but the principal and universally observed drink custom is that of drinking to the health and success of persons and undertakings. In chapter xi. it was shown how drinking originated at Court, and afterwards became the vice of the masses ; and how much might be hoped from the initiative of the Court in temperance reform. It would seem as if this responsibility was becoming felt at Court. In his address to the York Licensed Victuallers' Association, February 8, 1881, the Lord Mayor of York said he bad accepted the invitation of the association with much pleasure, especially when they had been so courteous as to give him the liberty to refresh himself with whatever beverage he thought proper. It reminded him of an occasion when some one dining at her Majesty's table was The Queen's drinking water, and it was pointed out to her Majesty, opposition to who replied, " There is no compulsion at my table." bondage of At the great Scottish Temperance Convention held in custoimMier Glasgow on the 28th of April, 1884, Mr. Robert Rae, the insight into secretary of the National Temperance League, said — dangifrs from "It often happens that the Queen dines many people, drink, and and I am glad to state that a good number of the guests with temper- are teetotalers. Especially is this the case amongst her ancerefoim. chaplains ; and to show that the temperance movement is spreading in the Queen's establishment, I may say that * A great number of these are mentioned with the sijecial penalties to be inflicted on those who break them. As recently as last June (1883) the papers furnish an account of how a labourer named Ellis, an abstainer, was maltreated because he refused to stand treat. "A pair of clamps — pieces of wood fastened by a screw in the middle — were placed on his neck, and he was held till signs of suffocation were apparent. He was then released, but he was in such a condition that he had to be taken to the infirmary, where he remains." 4o0 THE FOUNDATIOX OF DEATH. the last two house chaplains who were appointed were total abstainers. It is a significant fact that nearly all the new bishops recently created in the Church of England have been total abstainers." In her book, 3Iy Holidays in the HigJiIands, 1862-1882 (London, 1884), the Queen identifies herself in a very simple and effective manner with the cause of temperance reform. In referring to the work of her " dear and valued friend," the late Dr. Norman Macleod, she mentions with especial interest his sermon on the 2nd of October, 1870, in these words :— " Dr. Macleod gave us such a splendid sermon on the war, and without mentioning France he said enough to make every one understand what was meant, when he pointed out how God would punish wickedness, and vanity, and sensuality ; and the chapters he read from Isaiah xxviii.,* and from Ezekiel, Amos, and one of the Psalms, were really quite wonderful for the way in which they seemed, to describe France." Such expressions are a touching revelation of her Majesty's anxiety concerning the condition of things in her own realm, which has been practically evinced also by her becoming patron of the Church of England Temper- ance Society. * " 1. Woe to the crown of pride, to the drunkards of Ephraim, whose glorious beauty is a fading flower, whicii are on the head of the fat valleys of them that are overcome with wine. " 2. Behold, the Lord hath a miglity and strong one, which as a tempest of hail and a destroying storm, as a food of mighty waters overflowing, shall cas-t down to the earth -nith the hand. " 3. The crown of pride, the drunkards of Ephraim, shall be trodden under feet. " 7. But they also have erred through wine, and through strong drink are out of the way ; the priest and the prophet have erred through strong drink, they are swallowed up of wine, they are out of the way through strong drink ; they err in vision, they stumble through judgment. " 15. Because ye have said, We have made a covenant with death, and with hell are we at agreement ; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, it shall not come unto us : for we have made lies our refuge, and under falsehood have we hid ourselves. " 16. Therefore, thus saith the Lord God, . . . " 17. Judgment also will I lay to the line, and righteousness to the plummet : and the hail shall sweep away the refuge of lies, and the waters shall overflow the hiding-place." — Isaiah xxviii. WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 431 Thus it is seen that drink customs are no longer a matter of rigorous observance at court. The Queen her- self has done the temperance cause the inestimable service of removing from the relations between host and guests, from social etiquette and good manners, the burden of an irksome obligation, in the exchange of social amenities ; and society is no longer shielded under the pretence of loyalty nor by the code of good breeding, in using her formidable weapons of ridicule and satire against those who seek, by appropriate means, to liberate themselves and others from the evils of drink. From a paper on Freemasonry and Temperance in the The jnt^errat Western Morning News, the Good Templars Watchword bythe Prince (January 28, 1884) quotes the following, showing the "emperanc" interest felt by the Prince of Wales in temperance reform: — reform. " Lodges can choose as to when and where members shall take refreshments, and as to what shall be included or excluded in connection with those refreshments. Acting upon that privilege, a movement is progressing in the order for lodge to decree that no intoxicating liquors shall at any time be permitted to be introduced at their refreshment boards ; and, in some instances, new lodges are being formed with a clause in their bye-laws to this eifect. Such an one, on a large scale, was opened at Manchester in the beginning of last year, and now the three towns are about to follow the same course. A suggestion was made a few months since among a few of the temperance brethren that it would be worth while to ascertain if such a lodge could not be established there, and on the question being put to the test, they were astonished at the popularity of the movement. With scarce an effort over sixty masons, nearly all of several years' standing, and embracing numerous P.M.'s and provincial officers, came forward at once as being desirous to become members of the new lodge. The proposition was then submitted to the heads of the order in the three towns, when the whole of them, with, it is believed, only one exception, signed a recommendation that a warrant for the new lodge should be granted. The Provincial Grand Master added his recommendation, and now the information has been received that the Prince of Wales, M.W. Grand Master, has been pleased to grant a warrant 432 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. for the bolding of the said lodge under title of ' The St. George, No. 2025.' The membership is not confined to pledged teetotalers, nor will any attempt he made to so limit it. At all its banquets and entertainments everj endeavour will be made to make the social gatherings enjoyable, but without the aid of alcohol. The three principal officers named in the' warrant will be provincial ofiicers, who are total abstainers — the W.M. for twenty- eight years, the S.W. for eighteen years, and the J.W. a life-long abstainer. There were nearly fifty petitioners for the new lodge, and many of the brethren are active ' blue ribbonists ' and total abstainers." The interest At the distribution of prizes to the children of ele- theTate'i)uke nientary schools by the Liverpool Council of Education of Albany in (January 26, 1884), the late Duke of Albany* presiding, in the condition ^ ,.•'„: ^' , , tv , ■ ^ of the poor spcakmg 01 improved cookery and coiree taverns, said — '*"'i'° " I should like to see a rapid lift given to the standard reform. of cleanliness and care in the preparation of food in. the poorest homes. T should like to see meals which are now mere scrambles become points of real family union — occasions for showing forethought and kindliness and self- respect. And where circumstances make this too difficult, I should like to see the family enjoying a cheap and decent meal together at the coffee tavern, instead of the father being at the alehouse and the wife and children with a crust at home. And I think that if we can train the children early to see the difference between what dirt and waste and selfishness make of a poor man's dinner, and what thrift and care and cleanliness can make of it at the same cost, we shall be civilizing them almost more directly than by our sums or our grammar, and shall be taking in flank our great enemy, drink — drink, the only terrible enemy whom England has to fear." f Public bodies also are beginning to manifest a sense of responsibility in this direction. Thepracti- At the annual dinner of the Metropolitan Board of * The late Duke of Albany was for nine years patron of the Oxford Diocesan Branch and a president of the Church of England Temperance Society. — Annual Report Church of England Temperance Society, 1881.. t The Duke of Connaught ascribes his good health during the Egyptian cami^aign to his abstention from the use of intoxicating liquor. WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 433 Works, April, 1883, the imperative toasts of loyalty, etc., cai inaugu- were drunk in water. drinWn* At the inauguration of the Society for the Study toasts in and Cure of Inebriety (Rooms of the Medical Society Metrop^oman of London, April 25, 1884), at Avhich about one hundred Board of physicians were present, the toasts were drunk in un- April, 1883. fermented wines. Toasts In this struafo-le a2;ainst the public drink customs, the ''™"i^in cj'^ .^ . \ . ' unfermented remembrance of their inherent absurdities ought to weigh wines at the greatly with intelligent people. _ JrncCoi" "It is not usual," says the German Prince Puckler the Society (according to Dr. Grindrod, op. cit.), " to take wine during and Cure ot'^ dinner in England without drinking to another person. ^'^'^foF' When you raise your glass, you look fixedly at the one i884. with whom you are drinking, bow your head, and then The German drink with great gravity. Certainly many customs of the puclTer on South Sea Islanders, which strike us the most, are less theabsurdi- ludicrous. It is esteemed a civility to challenge anybody drink in this way to drink ; a messenger is often sent from one customs. end of the table to the other to announce to B that A wishes to take wine with him, whereupon each, and some- times with considerable trouble, catches the other's eye, and goes through the ceremony of the prescribed nod with great formality, looking at the moment very like a Chinese mandarin." "Never perhaps," says the Rev. B. Parsons (oj). cit.), The Rev. b. " was there a more irrational or absurd practice. As the'^same"" though we could not express our loyalty to the Queen, our good wishes to the bishops, clergy, and Church, or our affection to our friends and country, without swallowing a portion of poison ! In thousands of instances, love of. drink, not love to the monarch, is the origin of the toast, and those who are most noisy with their ' three times three ' are swallowing their money, their morality, their loyalty and patriotism all at the same time. Some of these would cur.se God and the king for a pot of beer, and others ruined by drinking and toasting are ready for any- thing that would mend their affairs and get them some drink. The most disloyal and disaffected of our country- men are those who have beggared themselves by drinking. It is impossible to tell the crime and misery which drink- ing of toasts has originated. Louis XIV. of France is said 2 F 434 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. to have foreseen tlie consequences, and to have prohibited the drinking of toasts." A working In 1864, A Working Man published a trenchant little same"" * ^ pamphlet entitled Pliilosophy of Toasts and Health Drinking, from which I quote the following : — ■ " The toast is applied to the health of the living, and to the memory of the dead ; to things far and near, past, present, and to come ; through every department in all the affairs of life, and prevails among all classes of society, from the peer who toasts the Queen's health to the beggar who drinks the publican's health with his last penny. . . . The simple ' Luck ! ' of the poor gives way to the toast in society. A gentleman stands on his feet and expatiates in glowing terras, it may be on the virtues of the Queen, or some other great one present or absent, living or dead, and, whatever the toast may be, the speaker is sure to conclude his speech by requiring the company to empty their glasses for the success, health, or happiness of the subject of the toast. If there existed any connection between the real and the possible, between that which the company desires to honour or promote, so that the one could be regarded as the cause and the other as the effect, or the one the means and the other the end, then there might be some show in reason for the practice, and so far a palliation of the evils resulting from excess. . . . But where is the connection between health and prosperity and the act of drinking strong liquor or wine ? Suppose a doctor took it into his head some fine morning, that instead of going out to visit his patients as usual, he would swallow pills to their health in the laboratory, and that he did so. He swallowed a pill to the health of each in succession, according to the order of his visits. ' Well, here goes a pill for the health of the man with the broken arm,' etc. Twenty-two pills in all ! What would be the state of the doctor ? what that of the patients ? and what would be said of his actions ? " Let us substitute for toasting with wine some kind of spice, salt or pepper, and the absurdity of toasting becomes as absurd in appearance as it is in fact. TheRev. "The habit of toast-drinking, whether public or wi'theBame* private," says the Rev. James Smith,* " is one which only * Temperance Reformation and its claims upon the Christian Church (London, 1875). WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 435 long-established usage and familiarity enable ns to regard as otherwise than highly ridiculous, and in every way un- worthy of an enlightened and civilized community. Does anybody really imagine that the Qaeen enjoys better health, that the army and navy are in a more flourishing condition, that the Church, the Press, or the Government do their work more efficiently because they are so frequently and enthusiastically ' toasted ' ? Is there any rational connection between the good wishes entertained and the mode in which they receive expression ? If any one really supposed that the person or subject in hand would prosper all the better in proportion to the frequency and enthusiasm of the toasting and the quantity of liquor consumed in the process, there would be some excuse for his indulging in the practice, whatever might be thought of his intellectual development ! There was more reason, if less civilization, in the action of the African mentioned by Dr. Livingstone, who emptied his snuff-box at the foot of a tree, in order to ensure the success of his comrades, who were engaged in an elephant hunt ! He, poor savage ! performed this ceremony ignorantly and superstitiously, believing that it would have some real efficacy ; while we, enlightened Christians ! perform an analogous heathenish ceremony, knowing it to be meaningless and vain. If health-drinking were confined to the health-giving beverage, water, the folly of the custom would speedily become apparent to all, and the practice would soon be numbered among the antiquarian relics of a barbarous age." There are many trade usages still extensively prevalent, which tend to create and foster a love for strone: drink, and are, consequently, instrumental in promoting intemjJer- ance among those concerned. Among such customs may be mentioned the payment ofioages at puhlic-houses, whereby many are brought into temptation, the ycung and in- experienced become the prey of confirmed inebriates, and those who may be desirous to reform have difficulties thrown in the way of their doing so. Thanks to the efforts of the Hon. Samuel Morley, M.P., Successor in the Commons, and of the Earls Stanhope and Shaftes- samuei"' bury in the Lords, this mischievous practice was abolished Moriey.M.p., in the spring session of 1883. ShafSJy Besides the drinking customs and usages, there are the and stanhope 436 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. in securing the abolition of the cus- tom of the payment of wages at public- houses. The Rev. William Cloister on the variety an(J prevalence of social drinking habits. social drinking tabits to combat. The Rev. William IMoister, in liis book, The Evil and the Remedy (London, 1877), well describes their variety and prevalence in the following words : — " Intoxicating drink, in some form or other, has at length come to be used on a variety of occasions, the very mention of which is somewhat startling, when we consider its character and tendency. It is frequently given to working men and others by employers of labour, to stimulate them to greater exertion in the discharge of their respective duties. It is introduced at almost all public and festive gatherings ; at marriages, baptisms, and funerals ; at sales, contracts, and friendly meetings ; and, in many otherwise well-regulated families, spirits, wine, ale, or porter, are placed on the table every day as common beverage at meal- times as well as on other occasions. In many localities the hospitality of the host is measured by the frequency and earnestness with which he presses the intoxicating cup on the attention of his guests. As soon as you arrive at the dwelling of your friend, the all-important question is put, "What Avill you take to drink ? " If you are weary with your journey, you are urged to take a glass of wine, beer, or other stimulating drink to refresh you ; if you are cold, it is recommended to warm you ; and if you are warm, it is represented as a cooling beverage. By some it is taken before dinner to create an appetite : at meals as a dilutant of food ; afterwards to aid digestion ; and imme- diately before going to bed to induce sleep. " In fact, alcoholic liquor, in some form, has come to be regarded by many as a common necessaiy of life ; and as such it is procured and kept in store for ordinary use, the same as bread, butter, meat, and other provisions. If a journey has to be taken, as a matter of course, the familiar bottle is replenished with the favourite liquid and placed in the basket or pocket with other refreshments. You cannot travel far by rail or otherwise, without being pain- fully reminded of the degeneracy of our race, and of the fearful extent to which the drinking customs of our country prevail among all classes." It is, of course, necessary, in order to make headway against these most widely observed and popular drink customs and habits, to inspire a healthy public sentiment, WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 437 in -wliicli their continuaiice shall be clearly seen to be both ridiculous and wronof. In his paper on The Wine Question of Society (Scrihners Dr. J. G. Monthly, Angast, 1872), the late Dr. J. G. Holland pro- t^e"my of posed a method for arousing such healthy public sentiment society m in these words: " 8ociety bids us furnish "svines at our * '^■'^^P^'^*- feasts, and we furnish them just as generously as if we did not know that a certain percentage of all the men who drink it will die miserable drunkards, and will inflict pitiful sufferings on those who are closely associated Avith them. . . . What we need is a declaration of independence. There are a great many good men and women who lament the drinking habits of society most sincerely. Let these all declare that they will minister no longer at the altar of the great destroyer. Let them declare that the indis- criminate offer of wine at dinners and social assemblies is not only criminal but vulgar, as it undoubtedly is. Let them declare, for the sake of the young, the weak, and vicious — for the sake of personal character, and family peace, and social purity, and national strength, that they Avill discard wine from their feasts from this time forth and for ever, and the work will be done. ... If the men and women of good society wish to have less di'inking to excess, let them stop drinking moderately. If they are not willing to break off the indulgence of a feeble appetite for the sake or doing a great good to a great many people, how can they expect a poor broken-down wretch to deny an appetite that is stronger than the love of wife and children, and even life itself ? " Perhaps no moral cause ever came up for general con- sideration more requiring the uncompromising action that is here suggested than the cause of temperance, or more in need of the conciliating influence of perfect good breed- ing and inexhaustible patience on the part of its upholders, or one more endangered by irritating, unenlightened prejudiced opinion, or having more to hope from the right exercise of enlightened and noble public sentiment.* § 97. In his Temperance Address at Boston (1846), Dr. chapin the Kev. Dr. Chapin exclaimed— °ponJlbTiitv "Who stand between the temperance movement and of wealthier * See chapter xi. pp. 300, 301. 438 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. the preva- lence of the drink evil. Lord Claud Hamilton's ptatement in St. James's Hall (May 19, 1870), about a pro- liibition estate in Tyrone. The evidence of Mr. T. W. Russell on the prohibi- tion estate of Bessbrook. its triunipli ? I answer the wealthy, the fashionable, the influential. The rum power in our country is backed up by the money power. Mammon and alcohol go hand in hand." This was true then. How much more true it is to-day, and truer still of Great Britain than of the United States ? Indeed, the whole wealth of England is in so com- paratively few hands that practically the magnates, by refusing the renewal of leases for public-houses on their estates, could, in a very few years, establish an almost complete prohibition, and, therefore, the wealth of this country must be largely responsible for the fate of the English temperance movement. But there are hopeful signs that this responsibility is being rightly felt. At St. James's Hall (May 19, 1870), Lord Claud Hamilton, Ex-M.P., said about a prohibition estate of some 10,000 population in County Tyrone, Ireland, " the result has been that whereas those high-roads w^ere, in former times, constantly the scenes of strife and drunkenness, necessitating the presence of a very considerable number of police to be located in the district, at present there is not a single policeman in the district. The poor rates are half what they were before, and all the police and magis- trates testify to the great absence of crime." Mr. Richard- son's flax-mills at Bessbrook, on the Belfast and Dublin railway, near Newry, are well known. I quote here at length from the report of the evidence given by Mr. T. W. Russell, of Dublin, and Mr. J. G. Richardson, the proprietor of Bessbrook, before the Lords' Committee on Intemperance (1880), as given in the Alliance Neivs (May 15, 1880). Says Mr. Russell, "Bessbrook was got possession of by Mr. John Grubb Richardson in 1847. It was just a hamlet of a few small houses, and now he has built a very fine town there ; there is no such town in Ireland, so far as sanitary arrangements are concerned. He has made it a rule that he will let no house for the sale of drink in any form, and, as a matter of fact, there has ncvei- been a drop of drink sold in Bessbrook since Mr. Richardson got possession of it. It is situated in the county of Armagh, three miles from Newry. Newry is a town of 14,000 inhabitants. Mr. Richardson has a large mill at Bessbrook, which employs the whole of the people. WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 439 There has never been a police-barrack, nor a policeman, nor a pawn-office in Bessbrook. I have a letter from the inspector of police at Newry, stating that there were only three cases of drunkenness from Bessbrook during the eighteen months previous to his writing, and I am very much of opinion that those were cases of farmers going home from Newry and passing through Bessbrook on their way ; but there everything is peace, prosperity, and comfort. It was submitted to the vote by ballot of the householders two years ago as a test, whether they would prefer a public-house being admitted or not, and the vote was nine to one against the introduction of public-houses. There is a district, in county Tyrone, covering sixty-one and a half square miles ; it adjoins the town of Dungannon, and goes near to Cookstown, covering three gi-eat public roads. I lived in the town of Dungannon for five years, and there were public-houses on that territory when I first went there ; but Mr. John Kinley Tener, who became the agent of the properties in the district, refused, I believe, to renew the leases of public-houses, and, as a matter of fact, the public-houses vanished. There were police- barracks in the centre ; they were closed in twelve months afterwards, and the policemen removed. The poor rates came down from Is. ^d. and Is. 6d. in the pound in the different townlands to bd., 6d., and 8d. Of late a spirit grocer has forced himself in upon the borders of that district ; the magistrates resolutely refused a license within the district, in order to keep the district clear; but a spirit grocer has planted himself, in defiance of the public opinion of the place, right on the border of the place, and I con- ceive that he will do damage there. That I conceive a very great hardship. This range of country belongs to three pi'oprietors. The population were not consulted, but I am bound to say when Mr. Tener gave up the agency some years ago, they presented him with a carriage and pair of horses, and an address, in which they referred to his action of clearing oif the public-houses as one of the greatest blessings which had occurred in the locality, and hoped that his successor would take care that the same rule prevailed. The population is 10,000. Now, I would venture to say that if it is right to allow Mr. Richardson and Mr. Tener to have the power to say, as Mr. Richardson same. 440 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. says, to 4000 people in Bessbrook, ' You stall not haA^e a public-house for the sale of liquor, because I think it will injure your interests and my interests,' and to carry out that rule, — I do not think it can be wrong to allow occupiers of property to say it, if they wish to say it, in their localities." The evidence And this is Mr. Richardson's testimony : — Richardson' " ^ ^^ ^^^ owner of some very extensive linen-mills at on the Bessbrook. It is a manufacturing town, containing about 4000 people, largely employed in a factory built by the Richardson family, situated about two miles from Newry, in the county of Armagh. The trade princii^ally carried on there is the spinning, weaving, and bleaching of linens and linen yarns of all kinds. About 3000 are employed in the general work of the concern, and 1600 outside in handloom weaving, etc. We began the concern in 1847, thirty-one years ago, and being then convinced that strong drink was the cause of serious injury, we resolved that no house for its sale should be established in our colony, and our experience has enabled us to prove that the absence of the liquor traffic has been a real blessing to our population. The result has been that we have been able to do without police, have no pawn-shops, and have very few people sent to the poorhouse, and have had no prostitution. I made inquiry before coming to give evidence before this com- mittee, and found that two persons, out of some 4000 people, were in the poorhouse — one a weak-minded woman who came from Lurgan, twenty miles off, and who was for a time out of charity brought to our place. On referring to the poorhouse returns for last week, I found that there w^ere eleven inside and nine outside persons receiving relief in our electoral division, called Camlough, containing more than 8000 people, while in Newry, a resjDectable and wealthy town near us, containing by the last census 14,000 inhabitants, and which now probably contains 16,000, thei-e appear to be 126 inside and eleven outside paupers. In the town of Newry there are 127 public- houses, two spirit grocers, and fifteen to twenty wholesale dealers in the liquor trade, making 149 in all ; thus giving one dealer in liquor for every 126 persons, which shows six and a half times as many in proportion to our electoral division, wdiich is really a poor one, including the village WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 441 of Camlough, containing seven public-liouses, wliicli, no doubt, add to the poverty of oui- district. So far as I can remember, we have not had thirty cases before the bench of magisti'ates out of our town of Bessbrook in the thirty- one years ; unfortunately, I have left behind me a letter I had from the late inspector of police on this subject. We have had more cases during the last two years in con- sequence of the increased facility of our people getting into Ne\\T.y by new conveyances which have been recently established, and, perhaps, from our not having been so strict in choosing some new families. I may add that, considering the population, we have had during our time very few illegitimate births, and that the death-rate has been from 12| to 14| per 1000, and that, for a factory population, the committee will agree is a very small pro- portion. We have about 1000 childi^en and young people on the Protestant sabbath school rolls, and a large number of our respectable young men and women teaching in them." There are several estates in England where for a long- time no liquor-shops have been allowed ; in South Hamp- shire, for instance, near Winchester, there is said to be a manor of some two thousand acres, where, as far as is known, there never was a public-house." Referring to the village of White Coppice, near Chorley, statement of Lancashire, before the House of Lords' Committee (1877- ^Jci^'cfn 1878), Mr. A. E. Eccles said — cemmgthe " The first nine years I lived in the village we had no vuiage'of" liquor-shops, and then for seventeen years we had liquor White Cop- shops, and for the last fifteen years we have been entirely without. Being young, I recollect very little about the first period, but during the seventeen years we had beer- shops in the village immorality was very common. I should say we had illegitimate children in every other house ; but during the last fifteen years we have had only two cases of illegitimacy, and we have had only one ille- gitimate child born in the village, and very little drunken- ness. That is a very striking contrast to the time when we had two beer-shops." Another vast and most successful estate in England TheSaitaire where no liquors are allowed is Saltaii-e, owned by Titus estate "^'"'^ Salt, M.P. U2 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. The pro- hibition real estate com- panies, of Mr. John Koberts in Liverpool, and the Artisans and Jxibourers General JJivelling Company ill London. The Pall Mall Gazette on this point. Mr. Hep- worth Dixon's description There are in all, it is .said, almost one thousand estates and villages in England where proprietary prohibition is enforced. Some large real estate companies, in London and Liverpool, wherever they extend their operations, exclude the public-honse. In Liverpool, the firm of Mr. John Roberts, M.P., for the Flintshire boroughs, hold vast amounts of property in the city, so that in 1882 the land laid out, or in course of being laid out by him, amounted to between 300 and 400 acres, with tlie number of about 10,000 houses and a population of 60,000, and nowhere on the property in Mr. Roberts' hands is a public-house suffered to exist ; and Mr. Balfour, in his article in the Contemporary (August, 1879), speaking of Mr. Roberts' transactions, says that Mr. Roberts declares, " That he never yet heard of a complaint being made of the want of a public-house, either from the houseowners or the tenant. And it is well known how prosperous is that vast real estate company in London, the " Artisans and Labourers General Dwelling Company." Only last August they opened a new estate, the Noel Park Estate, the Earl of Shaftesbury presiding, and when only this estate is com- pleted, it will contain between 2000 and 3000 houses, with a population from 16,000 to 18,000. And they not only do not allow public-houses on their estates, but they even exercise what influence they can on neighbouring landowners to prevent the establishment of a cordon of public-houses around them. Commenting on the estates managed by the "Artisans' Labourers and General Dwelling Company," the Pall Mall Gazette says — " The most remarkable fact of all, however, is that on all these three large estates there is not a single public- house, and that the inhabitants not only do not demur to this regulation of the company, but actually congratulate themselves on the existing condition of affairs, and strenu- ously resist all attempts to open public-houses near the estates." Mr. David Lewis, in his Tlie Drinlc Problem and its Solution (London, 1881), quotes the following graphic description — by the late Mr. Hepworth Dixon — of the WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 443 practical application of proTiibition in the town of St. of the results Johnsbury, Vermont: — ofproiiibi- y ' tion in St. JNo loafer nangs about the curbstone, not a beggar Joimsburj-, can be seen, no drunkards reel along the streets, there ^'■™°°'^- seem to be no poor. I have not seen in two days' wander- ing up and down one child in rags, one woman like a slut ; the men are all at work, the boys and girls at school. I see no broken panes of glass, no shingles hanging from the roof, no yard is left in an untidy state. What are the secrets of this artisans' paradise ? Why is the place so clean, the people so well housed and fed ? Why are little folks so hale in face, so smart in person, and so neat in dress ? All voices, I am bound to say, reply to me that these unusual yet desirable conditions in a workman's village spring from a strict enforcement of the law pro- hibiting the sale of intoxicating drink." And the subjoined list of questions, asked by Mr. F. B. Success of Boyce, Hon. Secretary N"ew South Wales Local Option fnfbelown League, and recently answered by the chief clerk of the cf Puiiman, town of Pullman, U.S.A., is full of pertinent interest : — " In what year was the city of Pullman founded ? "Answer: 27th May, 1880. " What is the population at present ? " Answer : 7500. " How many churches does it contain ? "Answer : Five have organizations here. " How many schools also, and teachers employed ? " Answer : Two school buildings, and thirteen public school teachers. " How many lock-ups or gaols ? " Answer : None. " Number of magistrates, with amount of salaries ? "Answer: None. " Number of police, and their cost ? " Answer : One, at £12 a month. " What is the annual amount spent on relief of the poor ? " Answer : Nothing. " Can you furnish us with your statistics of crime ? " Answer : We have had no crime. " Have you any asylums, such as those for lunatics, orphans, benevolent, etc. ? 444 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Temperance measures which might be adopted by the wealthy rail- way com- panies of Great Bri- tain. Dr. J. G. Holland on " Rum and Railroads." " Answer : None. " Is the trade in strong drink prohibited ? "Answer : Sale of malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors forbidden. " Do you attribute to the absence of facilities for getting drink any imj)roved state of morals, as compared with other cities in your state ? "Answer: We certainly do, as one important aid in this direction." § 98. Great good could be accomplished if the wealthy i"ailway companies of Great Britain would exclude liquors from theii' refreshment-rooms, and furnish thirsty travellers with plenty of fresh pure water and the various non- intoxicating drinks. In his paper on Rum and Railroads {Scribner's Monthly, May, 1872), Dr. J. G. Holland says — " There is an influence proceeding from the highest managing man in a railroad corporation, which reaches further for good or evil than that of almost any other man in any community. If the president or superintendent of a railroad is a man of free and easy habits, if he is in the habit of taking his stimti- lating glass, his railroad becomes a canal through which a stream of liquor flows from end to end. A drinking head man on any railroad, reproduces himself at every post on his line, as a rule. A thorough temperance man at the head of a corporation is a great purifier, and his road becomes the distributer of pure influences." The famous engineer, George Stephenson, manager of the Darlington and Stockton Railway Company — the oldest in the world — allowed no liquors to be sold at the stations of his line, and, after twenty-five years' connection with the company, declared that he was satisfied " that if all railway companies were to do away with the sale of drink at their stations, they would be best consulting the interests of the shareholders and the welfare of the travelling public." Since his day, until recently, temperance reform has made but slow progress among railway men, but of late years it is advancing both here and in other countries. In m uTirdirec- the winter of 1883 an encouraging example in this direc- tion, tion was set by the West Lancashire Railway Company, whose general manager, Mr. T. Gilbert, wrote to the British Women's Temperance Association : — The lead taken by Engineer George Stephenson. Action by the West Lancashire Railway WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 445 " I have the pleasure to inform you. that this couipany has no refreshment-rooms at any of its stations where intoxicating liquors are sold. It may be also interesting to you to know that the whole of the company's officials are total abstainers, and that no man receives an appointment under the company unless he has previously been an abstainer of some standing." At the Annual Meeting of the Midland Railway Growing Temperance Society, held at the Derby Station in February, theTotai* 1884, the chairman, Mr. John Noble, gave a most en- abstinence . I (• ji • piiiji movement couraging account or the growing success oi the total on the abstinence movement, not only all along the Midland line, MifHandime, __ ' «/ o ' and in tu6 but the Railway Union at large, and stated that public Baiiway sentiment along these great lines was daily becoming more we° ^^ favourable to this reform. A correspondent of On the Line states that the Great Oatmeal Eastern Railway supplies the " men at the London depots piled by'tiie with oatmeal drink, in large cans with a tap to them, ^^reat East- with drinking-cup attached, available to the men as they company"^ are at work, and that it is greatly appreciated by them." to their In its annual report, May, 1884, the Church of England Temperance Society states that " at least 10,000 out of 350,000 railway men -svork in the cause of temperance." In a paper on Drinking and Positions of Trust, the The Toronto Toronto Globe (Canada, February 6, 1884) says — ruaryM^ss-t) "The authorities of the Winconsin Central Railway ?° " i^^ink- issued in October last an order requiring the instant dis- of Positions missal of any employe who might drink even beer whether Trust." off or on duty. There was a good deal of opposition to the order at first, as if it infringed upon private rights, etc., but it has wrought so well that we are told several other large railway corporations are thinking of following the same course. This is in the right direction. The travelling public have a right to the greatest possible pro- tection, when on their necessary journeyings, and they will be pleased to know that none who are in charge of trains have even the chance of becoming drunkards. A man does not need to be drunk in order to work irreparable mischief. An extra glass, by giving him a certain amount of unsteadiness of hand or brain, may do all ; and these railway authorities in Wisconsin do well to say to all who seek employment from them, ' You can't drink and work -tlG THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH, for us. We don't ask you to give over drinking. That's your look-out, and you have a right to do as you please. But if you will drink you are not for us. We require men who have all their wits about them, and that any one who drinks never has.' What is wrong in that ? We can see nothing. More than this, we can see nothing but what is reasonable in employers of labour all round adopting the same principle. It is not the man who is actually drunk that causes the mischief by breaking machinery, com- promising his employers, and causing confusion all round. It is the man who thinks himself perfectly sober — the man who has only taken ' a couple of glasses of beer,' or a single ' horn ' of ' summat,' but who by these means has had his pulse raised a few degrees, has been made aggressive, daring, slightly reckless, yet sufficiently so to make all the mischief. It is the man who thinks that drink ' could not be known on him,' but whose tongue has been slightly loosed, and who has been led to believe that usually he had been but a slow-coach, and must show some more 'go.' This is the sort of man that a shrewd employer ought to fight shy of. . . . The clear brain and the steady nerve are more and more in requisition, and these are not compatible with even moderate tippling and occasional ' bursts.' " Mr. w. J. And the Temperance Itecorcl (February 28, 1884) quotes Spicer's ^\^q followinc? circuUvr to the Grand Trunk Railway, issued circulsr to , "^ * the Grand by its superintendent, Mr. W. J. Spicer : — RaiU^ay " ■'■ 'vs^ou^lcl ask you to Consider very seriously the advisability of joining our temperance movement for the year 1884. In my circular, December, 1880, I said 'there were a good many reasons specially applicable to railway employes for abstaining from the use of intoxicating drinks.' " You have the lives of the public and the safety of persons and property entrusted to your care, requiring at all times the utmost possible caution and vigilance in the performance of your duty. Again, railway eviployes, from their liability to night work, irregular hours, exposure to all kinds of weather, and from the foolish and expensive custom of ' treating,' are exposed to much danger and many temptations. Even passengers have gone so far as to offer, and in fact urge, conductors and brakesmen, when WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 44:7 on duty, to take drink, and have been the cause of train- men's dismissal from the service. I am sorry to say that I have had to deal summarily with such cases as have come to my knowledge. I only wish I could deal as severely with the perhaps good-natured but most thought- less and inconsiderate passengers. "Men subjected to such temptations, at any time, are safe only as total abstainers. The ' one glass more ' often has the effect of making a man careless, sleepy, and in- ditt'erent to danger, if not worse, at a time when he most needs to have all his senses clear and wide awake for his own and other's safety. " I have only to refer you to the Offence Circulars to satisfy you that I am speaking in the best interest of every employe of every grade, and in the interest of the company and the public, in urging you to become total abstainers for the year 1884." The discontinuance of the custom of distributing drink to crews now so largely the rule both on the inland lakes of the United States, on river crafts, ocean steamers, sail- ing vessels, and men-of-war, originated with Mr. Charles Howard, one of the pioneer shipping merchants of the United States. His son, the distinguished American author and playwright, Mr. Bronson Howard, tells the story so well that I prefer giving it in his own words from a letter written to me March 31, 1884, as follows : — " My father was personally associated with the shipping Mr. Bronson of the lakes from his earliest: manhood, beine: half owner Howard's ' o account of and master of a vessel, the Neiv York, before he was twenty- the origin of five years old ; and he was said to have been the original reform o'n^ of Fennimore Cooper's young sailor Jasper in the Pathfinder, theiakesand In 1830, when he was about twenty-six years old, and while he was master or ' captain ' of this vessel — one of a large fleet in Lakes Erie and Ontario — the incident of which 1 spoke to you occurred, and which was, 1 think, the beginning of the temperance system now almost universal in the mercantile marine of the ocean and the lakes. " In those days of general ' hard drinking ' it was the custom on our lakes to have a keg of wlnsky in the com- panion-way of every vessel, with its tap free to every member of the crew. Any deviation from this rule would have been considered mean and niggardly. The rule on 4:48 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. tlae ocean was, I believe, to serve out ' grog ' to the men, but this was done in such liberal quantities as to make the custom diifer but little from that in vogue on the American lakes. No owner or captain was free from the absolute tyranny of this custom-law. " During one of my father's voyages, late in December. 1830, the crew suffered frightfully from a violent storm, with snow, sleet, and ice. All their physical energies were needed to control the vessel. What makes such a situation doubly fatiguing and perilous is the fact that it is impossible to run before the storm as on the ocean, and the men are obliged to handle the sails and rigging at fi'equent intervals, though every rope and every inch of canvas is coated with ice. About one half of my father's crew drank nothing in the way of spirits while at work ; the other half drew liberally on the keg to ' keep them warm.' If ever whisky could do this service for mankind, it could do it under such circumstances. The result was that my father was obliged to depend entirely on the half of his crew that did not drink, for nearly thirty-six hours. At last they were forced to do the duty of both watches ; and as the second in command, the ' mate,' was one of the alcoholists, my father was compelled to remain in active command during the whole time without rest, until the vessel was safe. He has frequently told me with special emphasis that the men who drank did not make themselves drunk, and were not in that sense incapacitated on deck, while the other men were able to do double work. " This was only the last of many similar experiences, which had been almost as bad, and after the storm had subsided, my father, in a spirit of utter disgust, turned open the tap of the whisky keg, on his way down to the cabin, leaving the sacred fluid to its own unfettered fancy ! Soon after the mate appeared, and father saw him looking at the open faucet and shaking the empty keg with an expression of wonderment and dismay. When my father told him that the last drop of spirits had been drunk on board that vessel in the way of ' grog,' the mate exclaimed in astonishment and said that no owner nor captain could carry out such a wild plan. He and his fellow-drinkers left the crew at the end of the trip. Others, willing to go without ' grog,' were engaged in their places. WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 449 " To meet the certain charge of niggardliness, the ordinary rough sailors' fare was changed to the best food the market of each port could supply, including the finest coffee and other luxuries, such as oysters, etc., when within reach. " My father persisted in the plan he had thus marked out, and the result was a very important one, far beyond his anticipation, for an all-powerful commercial ally suddenly ranged itself on the side of temperance — the marine insurance companies began at once to allow dis- criminating rates on his vessel and on goods carried in it. All the other shipowners and masters on the lake were compelled to adopt the temperance rule, by the exigencies of business competition. Prom the lakes the custom spread — undoubtedly through the powerful pressure of the insurance companies — to the ocean ; and at the present day the custom of sixpplying liquor freely to sailors is a very rare exception, if it exists at all. Its latest strong- hold was the navy, which the interests of insui-ance com- panies cannot reach, of course. " The great reform resulting from my father's action, though not anticipated, was a matter of sincere pleasure to him in after years, as he watched its general develop- ment." A most valuable suggestion to wealthy merchants was Suggestion made about four years ago by the Honourable Samuel Hon'^SMnuei Morley, M.P. " The City of London Total Abstainers Moriey.M.P., Union had its origin in my warehouse," said he, " and I Abstainers cannot hut think some such association should he attached to Union . ■, , , should be every commercial concern. attached to S 99. The aristocracy, as a class, have been tardy in '^'^^^. *;°™' *^ '' •' QDiTCidL con- adding the weight of their example and influence to the cern. success of the temperance movement. But on the 21st of Action in April, 1883, a large number of the wealth and aristocracy BimTRibbon of London, both ladies and gentlemen, met at Stafford movement House, in response to an invitation from the Duchess of temperance Sutherland, to ioin in the Blue Ribbon movement, for the measures i- ^ n t)y the promotion oi the cause of temperance. aristocracy Lord Mount Temple presided, and said— of England. " The object of the meeting was to bring under their notice the overwhelming evils to the country resulting from the misuse of intoxicating and stimulating drinks. 2 G 450 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. That abuse filled our gaols, poor-law unions, and lunatic asylums ; brouglit misery, strife, and ruin to many of the homes of the working classes ; and overshadowed with sorrow and sympathy even those who were free from any personal experience of its evils, and who lived in comfort and refinement in such houses as that in which they were gathered. Another point to consider was the remedy for this deplorable state of things. The remedy which had been found by experience to be the most complete and satisfactory was for persons to pledge themselves to resist temptation. But that was beyond the reach of many. There had now been established a new form of fellowship, conviviality, and brotherhood, and that was the fellowship of the Blue Ribbon. The Blue Ribbon established a public opinion adverse to the di'ink influence.* It had created a large amount of public opinion in favour of total abstinence. It brought together the middle, lower, and upper classes, and established a common feeling. The question then arose, What was their duty to help on the new movement ? Their example would be felt much more than any amount of precept. He earnestly appealed to the aristocracy to join the new movement, as a means of conferring great and lasting benefits upon the poorer classes. It would necessitate some self-sacrifice, and perhaps call down upon them sneers and censui-e, but it was their duty ; and not only that, but, as in his own case, they would find many compensations for the sacrifice. The noble lady, too, who had invited them had exercised disinterested- ness, almost chivalrous courage, in adopting the blue ribbon, an example which he trusted would be widely fol- lowed, for it would help to caiTy light and joy into many a home." During the year 1883, several of the nobility have identified themselves in a practical way with the temper- ance cause. Thus, according to the annual report of the * " The Eev. S. Stnrges, M.A., Vicar of Wargrave, in his stirring speech in WiUis's Eooms, remarked, ' What a glorious thing it would be if the Princess of Wales and her daughters would assume the blue ribbon ! The Princess of Wales has endeared herself to the people of this country by her many admirable qualities. Eecently she has discountenanced the cruel sport of pigeon-shooting. But what is that compared to the cruel sport of drinking ? ' " — Civurch of England Temperance Chronicle, May 12, 1883. WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 451 Church of England Temperance Society, just published, " during the year coffee-taverns have been opened in Marylebone, at the sole cost of Viscountess Ossington ; in Wells, chiefly owing to the activity of the Lord Bishop of the Diocese ; and only in January last Lord Pembroke announced his intention of providing similar institutions upon his own estates. ... In May last, Lady de Rothschild invited the leading agriculturists, farmers, and others to a conference at Aston Clinton, when 62 out of 66 farmers invited attended. A resolution approving the payment of wages in money instead of beer was unanimously passed." At the laying of the corner-stone of the new wing of the London Temperance Hospital on the 24th of April, 1884, the Duke of Westminster, who officiated, said of alcohol that it had a tendency to produce artificial craving, and that many ignorant people had been led to suppose, because doctors prescribed wine and spirits, they must be a necessary means of cure for most maladies, and this mis- taken notion had laid the groundwork for habits of dangerous self-indulgence which might otherwise never have been formed. The Duke of Westminster informs me that since 1877 there have been " twenty-seven public- houses abolished on his London property." It is of great importance that temperance workers The signifi- should know and value the blue ribbon. It has a deep Biue^Ribbon symbolic meaning, and in a manifold sense : sympathy movement. with the fallen, sorrow that such a badge is necessary ; . hope, because of faith in God and man ; and help, by fellow- ship and willingness, to do each his part in saving from the evil of drink. The blue ribbon is a personal protest against di-inking, a Christian Garthaginem prceterea censeo against the public-house, a reminder and check against personal temptation to drink, a protection against solicitations to drink, an example and encouragement to those who might falter and fall, and a bond of fellowship between all those who wish to see man lifted out of the degradation into which alcohol has plunged him. The bit of blue ribbon which Mr. Samuel Morley, M.P., wears in the House of Commons and in the streets of the city, or when presiding over large temperance and other meetings for reform, is greater in its silent influence than anything 452 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Mr. Glad- stone's utterance as to the significance of the Blue Ribbon movement. The plan and organization of the Tem- perance Federatiop of Great Britain, 1883. he could say if that little sign were missing. Many ttink that the wearing of the blue i-ibbon is a childish sign of an enthusiasm that will vanish as quickly as it sprung up. But they who wear it hope and pray that, like that tiny portent in the sky, "no bigger than a man's hand," it will spread and spread until among all peoples in all lands the parching thirst, the destroying drought of alcohol, may be quenched in healing streams of pui^e invigorating water. The Rev. A. C. Bevington, minister of the Methodist New Connexion Chapel at Hawax-den, writing to the editor of the British Temperance Advocate, says that the Right Honourable W. E. Gladstone, in a recent conversation with him at Hawarden, thus expressed himself relative to the Blue Ribbon movement : — " From the first, I have watched the temperance question with gi^eat interest ; but I am bound to say that no phase of it has ever yielded me so much satisfaction as this has done. To witness the large number of ministers of all denominations, and, of course, the still larger number of members of perhaps all the Churches, wearing the ribbon of blue, is an exceedingly gratifying circumstance, and speaks well for the future ; * indeed, I firmly beUeve, as far as this matter is concerned, that much brighter days will soon, in God's good providence, dawn upon us." § 100. The initiative in a measure of very gTeat import- ance — if harmony can be maintained — to the temperance movement has just been taken in the proposition of Alder- man Clegg of Sheffield (chaii'man of the British Temperance League), that all the temperance organizations of Great Britain and Ireland should form a Temperance Federa- tion. To this end a meeting was held at Manchester, on the 17th of October, at which some seventeen temperance societies were represented. After long discussion, it was resolved — " That in the opinion of this meeting it is desirable to federate the various temperance organizations of the United Kingdom in favour of measures upon which there is a general agreement, and that a committee of delegates be * It is an encouraging fact that so important a personage as Sir W. F. Stawell, the Chief Justice of Victoria, has donned the blue ribbon. (See Temperance Record, May 8, lS8-i.) WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 453 appointed by tliis meeting to confer with the British Temperance League, and to draw the basis upon which snch federation should be founded." On the 8th of November, another large conference of delegates from the United Kingdom Temperance organiza- tions was convened at Exeter Hall, representing some two million total abstainers, for the purpose of drawing up a constitution of federation. The following rules were adopted : — " 1. That the Federation be styled ' The National Temperance Federation.' 2. That the objecta of the Federation shall be the promotion of temperance, both by moral suasion and legal enactment, by aid of the joint action of temperance oi-ganizations. 3. That the Federation shall consist of temperance leagues, unions, associations, and orders, and such other representative organizations as may be approved by the Executive Committee. 4. That the General Council shall consist of not more than five delegates from each federated society, and shall meet annually in London in January or February ; and an autumnal meeting shall be held in some provincial town. 5. The officers shall be elected by the General Council at the annual meeting, and shall consist of a president (who shall be elected annually), vice-presidents, treasurer, and secretaries. 6. The Executive Committee shall consist of one representative president from each federated society, together with the treasurer and secretaries ; and shall meet not less than once a quarter, at such time and place as they shall from time to time determine. 7. That the Executive Committee shall appoint a Parliamentary Committee, which, during the sitting of Parliament, shall meet once a week, or as often as may be necessary. 8. That no expenses shall be incurred without the consent of the Executive Committee, and such expenses shall be met by contribu- tions from the federated societies. 9. That no alteration in the above rules (when once adopted by the General Council) shall be made except at the annual meeting, or at a meeting specially called; and that one month's notice of any proposed alteration shall be given through the secretary, and shall not take effect except there be a two-thirds majority in its favour. Suggested Basis. The basis of co-operation for the federated societies is that they should work together in view of legislative and other action on the points upon which they are agreed, and bring their influence to bear on Parliament, and with 454 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. her Majesty's Government, and through the countrj generally, as a united body ; such common action to extend, of course, only so far as there is common agree- ment, and to be made subservient to the carrying of measures of positive advance, as well as to the careful guarding against any proposals of a retrograde nature. Suggested Points on which Common Action Might be taken. 1. The Federation might at once, by a united memorial, signed by the officers of each organization, urge on the Cabinet the duty of extending and making perpetual the Irish Sunday Closing Act, and of acceding to the nation's manifest desire for an English Sunday Closing Bill ; and also the duty of their seeing that time is made available during the coming session for such legislation ; and at the proper time the Federation might be strongly represented in the lobby of the House of Commons, in order to ensure the success of these measures. 2. The federated organizations might urge upon her Majesty's Government the further duty of fulfilling the pledges so often given by them, to deal with the Licensing Laws in general, and to no longer postpone action in this regard ; viewing the now thrice-expressed opinion of the House of Commons in favour of an efficient measure of Local Option. They might urge especially two points : — (a) That the control of the issue of licences, whether for the first time, or by way of renewal, transfer, or removal, should be in the hands of the ratepayers, and that in present cir- cumstances this may be done by the formation of Licens- ing Control Boards, specially elected for the purpose by the ratepayers, and with full power to withhold all or any of the Licences ; but that in any well-defined area forming part of a district for which a board has been elected, the ratepayers shall have a direct veto for the withholding of all licences. (b) That by no parliamentary enactment should there be a creating of vested intei'ests in licences, which interests legal decisions have emphatically declared do not exist. With reference to this question also a joint memorial to the Cabinet might be of value at this time, as well as the careful watch. ing of any Government, or other measure proposed, and prompt action either in support of, or opposition, to, or for amendment of, the same. 3. An emphatic joint expression of opinion in favour of the sup- pression of grocers' and o£E licences might likewise be at once for- warded to the Government ; as well as against the power of granting occasional licences, or extension of hours, and in favour of closing public-houses on the days of municipal and parliamentary elections. It was also resolved — 1. That the Federation does not WHAT CAN BE DONE ? 455 approve of, but will oppose to the full extent of its influ- ence, the placing of the power of granting licences in the hands of Town Councils or County Boards. 2. That each organization represented be invited to contribute not less than £5 each, to meet the incidental expenses of the Federation duinng the first year." On the 6th of February, 1884, a meeting was held at Exeter Hall by delegates of this proposed federation, and it was resolved to form a National Temperance Federation on the following basis : — " The basis of co-operation for the federated societies is that they should work together in view of legislative and other action on the points upon whicb tbey are agreed, and bring their influence to bear on Parliament and with her Majesty's Government, and through the country gene- rally, as a united body ; such common action to extend, of course, only so far as there is common agreement, and to be made subservient to the carrying of measures of positive advance, as well as to the careful guarding against any proposals of a retrograde nature." — ]\Ir. W. T. Caine, M.P., was elected president, and vice-presidents and other ofiicers were appointed. § 101. Yet all these noble and heroic efforts will Thefounda- coUapse, as in the past, if they be not founded in individual temperance character and worth. reform in On the individual, be he rich or poor, eminent or character obscure ; on his patience, unselfishness, wisdom, constancy, ^^^ worth. and humility, all reform, all regeneration, comes at last to depend ; without these, Church, State, and society, together with their loftiest schemes, fall little by little into moral decay. The first thing is, for each man, woman, and child of us, yes, each one, the gi'eatest and the least, to start with the conviction and understanding that tempei'ance is not limited to abstinence from alcoholic liquors, but that it means, as Cicero expressed it, " the unyielding control of reason over lust and over all -wrong tendencies of mind . . . modesty and self-government . . . abstinence from all things not good and entirely innocent in their character.^' And to remember that while the work to be done is so 456 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. The hope of temperance reform — like the hope of all other reforms — is vested in love, labour, and humility. great that bo one person could ever hope to do it, and the evil to be uprooted so strong and full-grown that "sve may not reasonably look for its subjugation in our own day, yet that the work will be done, the evil overcome, if each one does his part toivards it* " The one secret of life and development is not to devise and plan, but to fall in with the forces at work — to do every moment's duty aright." f Then, in whatsoever place, circumstance, or condition we are placed, we are to find out, each of us, what our own personal individual duty is, and we shall be sure to find this out if we care supremely to know. With the performance of duty will come wisdom, show- ing us how to avoid giving offence, how to undermine and subdue evil without wounding fi'iend or affronting opponent. With wisdom also will come patience, because we shall leam to understand that what is gained easily, too often passes quickly because it is not gained thoroiighly, and we shall learn not to be dismayed by much labour, and much waiting", because we shall, by our persistence and constancy, have learned unselfishness, and know that what we are sowing shall be reaped by them that come * A noble instance of just this individual fidelity, as related of the late Mr. Joseph Sturge by the philanthropist Mr. T. B. Smithies, is thus reported in The Christian (March 6, 1883) — " One day Mr. Sturge met a drunken man, and questioned him as to his condition. The man replied that he had got drunk at such and such a public-house, and added, ' The beer was made from your barley.' The statement startled him, but it at once influenced his action. The following issue of the Mark Lane Exjiress contained a notice from Messrs. Sturge that under no circumstance^ would they in future supply barley for malting purposes. This decision struck off £8000 a year from their income." An equally admirable individual effort for temperance was that made by the Eev. Carr Glynn, Vicar of Kensington, when appointed at Doncaster. Having observed the temptation the public-house offered to early outdoor labourers, he procured a cart, supplied it with a first-class coffee-stand ; went himself with it to places where early outdoor labour was going on, and induced the workmen to take his coffee instead of going to the public-house to get whisky or beer. I have this incident on the authority of Mr. Heaton, Commissioner of Lunacy. t See George MacDonald's noble story of Sir Gilhie (London, 1879). WHAT CAN BE DONE? 457 after us, when " bells in unbuilded spires, and voices of unborn choirs " shall bless our names and the good work we have done ; and we shall be happy in knowing that the saplings we set out, though they grew too slowly to give shade to us, will make the green and healthy ever- lasting bowers where our children's children's homes shall be. APPENDIX. THIRTY-SEVENTH EEPOET OF TABLE XXII.— Showing the Assigned Causes of Insanity * BoKOUGH Asylums, Eegistered Hospitals, Natal and Military Wales, during the y'ear 1882. [The total number of these admissions during 1882 was Number of instances Causes of insanity. As predisposing cause.f A s exciti cause.f ig M. F. T. M. F. T. Moral. Domestic trouble (including loss of relatives and friends) 42 78 120 174 554 728 Adverse circumstances (including business anxieties and pecuni- ary difficulties) 88 43 131 431 207 638 Mental anxiety and "worry" (not included iinder the above two heads) ; and overwork 49 31 80 263 289 552 Religious excitement ... 6 14 20 155 188 343 Love affairs (including seduction) ... 4 15 19 39 129 168 Fright and nervous shock 5 5 10 36 96 132 Physical. Intemperance, in drink 135 33 168 904 364 1,268 ,, sexual 13 7 20 54 32 86 Venereal disease 14 2 16 14 7 21 Self-abuse (sexual) 16 2 18 79 5 84 Over-exertion 11 5 16 27 29 56 Sunstroke 64 2 66 67 7 74 Accident or injury 104 20 124 160 35 195 Pregnancy 11 U 37 37 Parturition and the puerperal state 31 31 346 346 Lactation — 24 24 123 123 Uterine and ovarian disorders 21 21 95 95 Puberty 3 18 21 3 30 33 Change of life 88 88 138 138 Fevers 9 10 19 26 20 46 Privation and starvation 9 35 44 55 114 169 Old age 98 114 212 65 78 143 Other bodily diseases or disorders ... 142 139 281 352 416 768 Previous attacks — — — — _ — Hereditary influence ascertained ... _ _ Congenital defect ascertained — — — — — — Other ascertained causes •2.1 25 52 127 32 159 Unknown — — * These " causes " are not taken from the " statements " in the papers of admission the asylums. t With reference to the above distinction between "predisposing" and "exciting" any individual case. X These totals represent the entire number of instances in which the several causes mental disorder. The aggregate of these totals (including " unknown "), of course. THE COMMISSIONERS IN LUNACY. IN THE CASES OP ALL PaTIEXTS ADMITTED INTO CotTNTT AND Hospitals, State Asylums, and Licensed Houses in England and 13,581, being 6,663 of the male, and 6,918 of the female sex.] in which each cause was assigned. Proportion (per cent.) to the total number of As predisposing or exciting cause (where Total.+ patients admitted during these could not be distinguished.) f the year. M. F. T. M. F. T. M. F. T. 66 82 148 282 714 996 4-2 10-3 7-3 96 32 128 615 282 897 9-2 4-0 6-6 84 54 138 396 374 770 5-9 5-4 5-6 35 33 68 196 235 431 2-9 34 31 6 27 33 49 171 220 •7 2-4 1-6 18 21 39 59 122 181 •9 1-7 1-3 269 74 343 1,308 471 1,779 19-6 6-8 131 18 9 27 85 48 133 1 2 •7 1-0 10 5 15 38 14 52 6 ■2 •4 25 1 26 120 8 128 1 8 •1 ■9 8 1 9 46 35 81 7 •5 •6 28 1 29 159 10 169 2 4 •1 1-3 101 13 114 365 68 433 5-5 10 3-2 7 7 — 55 55 — •8 •4 79 79 456 456 — 6-6 3-3 10 10 — 157 157 — 2-3 11 16 16 — 132 132 — 1-9 10 9 8 17 15 56 71 •2 ■8 •5 48 48 274 274 — 3-9 20 7 8 15 42 38 80 ■6 ■5 •6 26 27 53 90 176 266 1-3 2-5 19 86 108 194 249 300 549 3-7 4-3 40 255 208 463 749 763 1,512 11-2 110 11-1 — - - 878 1,273 2,151 13-2 18-4 15-8 _ 1,239 1,506 2,745 18-6 21-8 20-3 — — — 363 229 592 5-4 3-3 4-3 50 34 84 204 91 295 3-0 1-3 2-1 — — 1,417 1,441 2,858 21-3 20-8 21-0 of the patients, but are those which have been verified by the Medical OflBcers of causes, it must be understood that no single cause is enumerated more than once in (either alone or in combination with other causes) were stated to have produced the exceeds the whole number of patients admitted ; the excess is owing to the combinations. 462 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. TABLE XXIII. — Showing the Assigned Causes of Insanity in Registered Hospitals, Naval and Military Hospitals, State THE YEAR 1882, ARRANGED ACCORDING TO THE ClASS OF THE Causes of insanity. Moral. Domestic trouble (including loss of relatives and friends) Adverse circumstances (including business anxieties and pecuniary difBculties) Mental anxiety and "worry" (not included under the above two heads); and overwork Religious excitement ... Love affairs (including seduction) Fright and nervous shock Physical. Intemperance, in drink „ sexual Venereal disease Self-abuse (sexual) Over-exertion Sunstroke Accident or injury Pregnancy Parturition and the puerperal state Lactation Uterine and ovarian disorders Puberty Change of life Fevers Privation and starvation Old age Other bodily diseases or disorders Previous attacks Hereditary influence ascertained Congenital defect ascertained Other ascertained causes Unknown Number of instances in which Prh-ate. The total number admitted was 2,212. (1,134 males and 1,078 females.) 152 94 246 19 53 72 13 43 56 7 30 37 198 73 271 27 2 29 15 1 16 29 4 33 11 4 15 29 1 30 40 13 53 — 9 9 — 66 66 — 11 11 — 49 49 3 8 11 — 58 58 17 10 27 1 — 1 31 35 66 102 105 207 146 194 340 214 236 450 77 53 130 97 22 119 170 157 327 T. APPENDIX. 463 THE Patients admitted into County and Borough Asylums, Asylums, and Licensed Houses in England and Wales, duking Patients. each cause was assigned. Proportion (per cent.) to the total number of patients in each class admitted during 1882. PAnPER. The total number admitted Private. Pauper. was 11,369. (5,529 males and 6,840 females.) M. F. T. M. F. T. M. F. T. 225 591 816 5-0 11-4 8-1 40 101 7-1 492 242 734 10-8 3-7 7-3 8-9 4-1 6-4 244 280 524 13-4 8-7 11-1 4-4 4-8 4-6 in 182 359 1-6 4-9 3-2 3-2- 31 31 36 128 164 1-1 3-9 2-5 •6 2-2 1-4 52 92 144 •6 2-8 1-6 •9 1-6 1-2 1,110 398 1,508 17-4 6-7 12-2 200 6-8 13-2 58 46 104 2-4 •2 1-3 1-0 •8 •9 23 13 36 1-3 •1 •7 •4 •2 ■3 91 4 95 2-5 •3 1-5 1-6 — •8 35 31 66 •9 ■3 ■7 •6 •5 •6 130 9 139 2-5 •1 1-3 2-3 •1 1-2 325 55 380 3-5 1-2 2'4 5-8 •9 3-3 — 46 46 •8 •4 — •8 •4 — 390 390 61 2-9 — 6-6 3-4 146 146 1-0 •5 — 2-5 1-3 83 83 4-5 2-2 — 1-4 •7 12 48 60 •2 •7 •5 •2 •8 ■5 — 216 216 5-3 2-6 — 3-7 1-9 25 28 53 1-5 ■9 1-2 •4 •4 •4 89 176 265 •1 — — 1-6 30 2-3 218 265 483 2-7 3-2 2-9 3-9 4-5 4-2 647 658 1,305 8-9 9-7 9-3 11-7 11-2 11-4 732 1,079 1,811 12-8 17-9 15-3 13-2 18'4 15-9 1,025 1,270 2,295 18-9 21-8 20-3 18-5 21-7 20-2 286 176 462 6-8 4-9 5-9 5-2 3-0 40 107 69 176 8-5 20 5-4 1-9 1-1 1-5 1,247 1,284 2,531 14-9 14-5 14-8 22-5 22-0 22-2 464< THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. TABLE XXIV. — Showing the Assigned Causes op Insanity in THE CASES OF THE GENERAL PARALYTICS ADMITTED INTO COUNTY AND BOROrGH ASYLUMS, REGISTERED HOSPITALS, NaVAL AND Military Hospitals, State Asylums, and Licensed Houses in England and Wales, during the year 1882.* [The total number of these admissions was 1,151, being 923 of the male, and 228 of the female sex.] Causes of insanity. Number of instances in which each cause was assigned. Proportion (per cent.) to the total number of general paralytics admitted. M. F. T. M. F. T. MOEAL. Domestic trouble (including loss of relatives and friends) Adverse circumstances (including business anxieties and pecuni- ary difficulties) Mental anxiety and "worry" (not included under the above two heads) ; and overwork Religious excitement Love affairs (including seduction) ... Fright and nervous shock Phtsicai,. Intemperance, in drink sexual Venereal disease Self-abuse (sexual) Over-exertion Sunstroke Accident or injury Pregnancy Parturition and the puerperal state Lactation Uterine and ovarian disorders Puberty Cliange of life Fevers ... ... Privation and starvation Old age Other bodily diseases or disorders ... Previous attacks Hereditary influence ascertained ... Congenital defect ascertained Other ascertained causes Unknown 35 126 65 10 3 3 234 28 9 3 14 32 71 2 18 3 115 63 161 I 9 242 22 15 3 1 2 30 7 4 1 3 I^ 4 2 6 7 5 35 18 42 I 2 75 57 141 68 11 5 3 264 35 13 3 14 33 74 4 13 4 2 6 2 25 8 150 81 203 2 11 317 .3-8 13-6 7-0 1-1 •3 •3 25-3 30 1-0 •3 1-5 3-5 7-7 •2 1-9 •3 12-4 6-8 17-4 •1 i-o 26-2 9-6 6-5 1-3 •4 •9 13-1 30 1-7 •4 1-3 1-7 5-7 1-7 •9 2-6 30 2-2 15-3 7-8 18-4 •1 •9 32-9 4 12 5 22 3 1 1 2 6 1 2 13 7 17 27 •9 •2 •9 •9 •4 •2 9 1 2 2 8 4 3 1 3 2 5 2 1 6 9 5 * This table may be compared with Table XXII., which shows the Causes of In- sanity in the cases of aH the patients admitted during 1882. APPENDIX. 465 TABLE XXV. — Showing the Assigned Cacses of Insanity in the CASES OF the Patients with Suicidal Propensity who were admitted into County and Borough Asylums, Registered Hospitals, Naval and Military Hospitals, State Asylums, and Licensed Houses in England and Wales, during the year 1882.* [The total number of these admissions was .3,877, being 1,785 of the male, and 2,092 of the female sex.] Proportion (percent.) Number of instances to the total number Causes of insanity. in which each of patients admitted cause was ass igned. with suicidal propensity. M. F. T. M. F. T. Moral. Domestic trouble (including loss of relatives and friends) 110 269 379 61 12-8 9-7 Adverse circumstances (including business anxieties and pecuni- ary difficulties) 121 104 225 6-7 4-9 6 Mental anxiety and "worry" (not included under the above two heads') ; and overwork 13S 153 291 7-7 7-3 7-5 Religious excitement 63 79 142 3-5 3-8 3-6 Love affairs (including seduction) ... 16 60 76 •9 2-9 1-9 Fright and nervous shock 17 40 57 •9 1-9 1-4 Phtsical. Intemperance, in drink 340 130 470 19 6-2 12-1 „ sexual 15 6 21 8 •3 •5 Venereal disease 9 5 14 5 •2 •3 Self-abuse (sexual) 37 3 40 2 •1 1-0 Over-exertion 10 10 20 6 •5 •5 Sunstroke 26 2 2S 1 4 •1 •7 Accident or injury 100 25 123 5-6 1-2 3-2 Pregnancy — 15 15 — •7 •4 Parturition and the puerperal state — 147 147 — 70 3-8 Lactation — 66 66 — 31 1-7 Uterine and ovarian disorders 54 54 2-6 1-4 Puberty 7 12 19 •4 •6 •5 Change of life ... — 112 112 — 5-3 2-9 Fevers ' 10 7 17 ■6 •3 •4 Privation and starvation 29 54 83 1-6 2-6 2-1 Old age 61 60 121 3-4 2-9 31 Other bodily diseases or disorders ... 210 226 436 11-8 10-8 11-2 Previous attacks 248 368 616 13-9 17-6 15-8 Hereditary influence ascertained ... 385 502 887 21-6 24-0 22-8 Congenital defect ascertained 53 38 91 2-9 1-8 2-3 Otlier ascertained causes 39 22 61 2-2 10 1-6 Unknown 344 3S7 731 19-2 18-5 18-8 * This table may be compared with Table XXII., which shows the Causes of Insanity in the cases of all the patients admitted during 1882. 2 H 466 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. g 1 § S p § Q ^^ H ■< S H W g S " S H H H O zn « -"§ w >a a ^ ^ 3 o 2 o a « R '«^ B >* w 53 (3 Cj >s < 2: w £2 <1 Sj 3 « 9 in M S ^" O J (3 g a (^ bO to CO "? ?" CO to "O -^ -t^ O •"• H 00 00 ?n *-■ kO g a g|5 p o a ■s o a ■3 -i a s i^ M lO to M OJ '* o CO •T3 5 •g rt ■j3 O :5 2 * 3 li S |5| 1 °| "? (N 00 o N 00 00 Ah ^ o S rH »-t 0> 2 r» o -* o> 1 H "^ Ol «- CO to s rH* co" a "s 1 >. 3 S J3 "S c .-s ^j o 00 \a 00 f-l ■H* N 3 — rt fe CO o rH CO M N « o S t- 2 M ft ^^ C4 ja 3 i Vh S CO »- 00 O ^ 12; ^ s CO to ^ CO -^ s •^ '^ o -* CO o O H o O) c^ CO CO to n G C^ CO w- « O "^ (N «> 00 CO to o 00 »-. :3 O^ 1^ 11 3 S P^ ^ ^ to OI « " s- ll 00 00 to t^ ->>. u O o lU .2 o a "2 ^ fi a 1^ 1 c3 >. ^a o s s ^ 'a "S o o p^ .2 "2 g O cc .2 =3 _ O H 1 i (2 .- <3 go to Jj t2 1 Local Option, Prohibition and Compensation. The Alliance Neivs for June 28, 1879, had the following leader on " The Eights of Sober Men. " We hear and read a good deal about the rights of drinkers. We are told, indeed, by the Times that no man now defends drunkenness. Perhaps not. Thousands, however, excuse it, and millions practise it. Men affirm that they will not have Maine Laws, Permissive Bills, Local Option, or anything of the sort. They stand upon what they call their rights. Now, let it be under- stood that no civilized people permit any man absolute freedom of speech and action. We are all under law. Our freedom is not without bounds. There are legal and moral barriers around us. All true life has limitations. Unlimited liberty means fire, slaughter, confusion, and misery. " For any man, therefore, to argue about his riehts, and especially about his ri. 593). 1877. Baer, A., Der Alcoholismus, seine verbreitung, etc. Berlin, 1878. , Ueber Trnnksucht und Verbrecben. (Arch./. Psych., x. |>. 231.) Berlin, 1880. Geissler, E., Eia Beitrag zur Frage der Verfalschung der Lebens- niittel. 1878. Reischuuer, C, Chcmie d. Bieres. 1878. Schmid, W., Anleitung zu sanitarisch und polizeilich chemichen Untersnchun!::en. 1878. Schnacke, G. E. A., Worterbnch derPriifungen verfalschter, verun- reinigter imd imitirter Waaren. Gera, 1878. Wittstein, G. C, Taschenbuch der Nahrungs u. Genussmittelehre. 1878. Bericht des Vorstandes iiber die Ausfiihrung friiberer Veieins- bescLliisse (Verein der deutschen Irrenaizte) emeine Trin- kerfra'4eur St;int.saufr.icht der Irrenanstalten. (Allge?neine Zeitichrift f. Psychiatrie, ttc. Bd. xxxvi. p. 733.) Berlin, 1870. Dietzsch, 0., Die wiclitigsten Xahrungsmittel und Getranke. 1879. Eilger, A., Die wichtigsten Nahrungs und Genussmittel wesent- liche Bestandsiheile, verlalschuugen nebst Priit'ung. 1879. Stark, Carl, Die physchische Degeneratiou. Bmz Griindzuge der Arzneimittellehre. 1870. Einundvieizigster Jabresb-ricbt der Entbaltsnmkeits Gesellscbaft des Danziger Landkreises. 1879-18bO, Koni;jr,berg, 1880. EirscJilinr/, Ij., Besprechungen singer der wichtigstea Iv'abrungs- mittel. 1880. Samuel, S., Allgemeine Patbologie. Stuttgart, 1880. Galle, T., Ui.-her die Beziehungen des Alcoholismus Zur Epileptic. (Inane. Dissert.) Berlin, 1881. Voigt, C. F., Physiologic des allg. ^5toffwechsels und der Eraahrung. (L. Hermann's Handbuch der Physiologic, Bd. vi. 1 th.) Leipzig, 1881. Ortloff, Die Nahrungs und Genusmittelverkebr. Weimai', 1882. Palm, P., Die \vichtiL::sten und gebrauclilichsten meuschlichen Nahrungs — Genussmittel und Getranke. 1882. Pettenkofer, Max von, Handbuch der Hygiene und der Gewer- bekrankheiten. (Contributed by a number of the principal phvbicians in Gerulan3^ Edited by Prof. M. V. Ptttenkofer and Prof. H. V. Ziemssen.) Leipzig, 1882. Von Speyr, Die Alc<'l sciien Geisteskraukheiten im Basler Irren- hause, etc. Berlin, 1882. Bodldnder, Guido, Pfluyers Arch.f. Physiologle. Bd. 32. Sept., 1883. 548 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. FalcJc, Vergiftung durch alkohol und alcoholische Gelriinke. Handb. der specellen Pathologie, etc. 1883. Harnack, Erich, Lehrbach du Arzneimittelehre und Arzneiverord- nungslehre. (Founded on Bucbheim's Arzneimittellehre, 3rd ed. vol. i.) Hamburg und Leipzig, 1883. Konig, t7.,Die menscblicben Nabrungsund Genussmittel. (Vol. ii. Die Alcoholiscben Getranke, pp. 449-600.) Berlin, 1883. Buetz, Otto, Wie lassen sicb Verfalscbungen d. Nabrungs Genuss und Consumarticle leicbt und sicber nacbweisen. Neuwied und Leijizig, 1883. WoJfers, Pfliigers, Arcb. f. Pbysiologie. Bd. 32. Jan., 1883. Ziemssen, H. von, Hnndbucb der AUgemeine Therapie. 1 B. (Article by Prof. Bauer.) Leijizig, 1883. Kornfeld, Hermann, Handbucb der Gericbtlicben Mediciu in Beziebung zu der Gezetsgebung Deutscblands und des Auslandes. (Alkobol, s. 241.) Stuttgart, 1884. Eirscli, E., Die Truuksucbt und ihre Bekamfung eine Denkscbrift Oberbausen. 1884. Nencki, Correspondenz fiir Scbweitzer Aerze. N. 5. 1884. FRANCE. Stephanns, Pater C, Vinetum, in quo varia vitinm, uvarum, vinorum antiqua latina et vulgaria nomina item ea, quaj ad vitium cnlturam ab antiquis expressa sunt ac recepta vocabula continetur. Parisiis, 1537. Columella, L. J. M., De re rustica (lib, x. 116). Parisiis, 1549. Diodorus, Sicnlus, Bibliotbeca bistorica (lib. i. 3, 4, rebus ^gyp- tiacis). Parisiis, 1549. Dioscorides, Pedacius, Libri octo Grajce et Latine. Parisiis, 1449. Plinius, Secundus Cuius, Naturalis bistorijB (lib. xxxvii.). Parisiis, 1549. Gratarolus. De vini natura. Argentorati, 1565. Alexis de Piedmont, Les Secrets du Seigneur Alexis Piedmontios augmentez d'un livre de distillation, avec figures des Iburneaux. Paris, 1576. Lullus, Eaimundus, Testamentum Novissumum. Argentorati, 1571. Textor, V., Traicte de la nature du vin et do Tabus taut d'iceluy que des autres brewages. Paris, 1604. Simeon, SetJi, Antiocbeni volumen de alimentorum facultatibus juxta ordinem litcrarum digestum. Lutetise Parisiorum, 1658. Gusson, N., and //. Mathiev, Ergo vinum vitai et staturaj detrabit. Parisiis (Paris), 1667. BIBLIOGRAPHY. 549 Hoc, L. P., An aqua vitse aqua mortis? (These pour doctorat.) Paris, 1743. Osereiskoasky, N., Specimen inaugurale (\e spiritu ardente ex lacte bubulo. Argentorali (Strasburg), 1778. Girtanner, Memoires sur I'irritabilite consideree comme principe de vie dans la nature organisee. {Journal de Physique.^ Paris, Juin, 1780. Encyclopedie Methodique. Medicine, tome i., article Alcohol, p. 646. Paris, 1782. Parmentier, A. A., Sur les eaux de vie considerees comme boisson a I'usage des troupes. In Ann. de Chim. (Serie I. lix. p. 5.) Paris, 1806. Canu, Ferdinand, Eecherches sur I'histoire, la nature, les effets et I'emploi livgieniques du vin et des liqueurs spiritueuses. (These pour doctorat. No. 273.) Paris, 1815. Pages, C. F., Recherches sur les phenomenes produits par I'introduc- tion des liqueurs alcoholisees dans les voies digestives. Paris, 1815. Versepuy, S., Essai sur les effects des liqueurs alcoholiques. Paris, 1815. Fauconnier, J. B., De I'influence des liqueurs alcooliques sur le systeme nerveux. Paris, 1819. Boyer, P., Memoire sur Delirium tremens. Paris, 1819. Vaullegeard, F. A., Considerations generales sur les boissons alcoholiques. Paris, 1820. Gail, Jean F., Recherches sur la nature du culte de Bacchus. Paris, 1821. I.ohry, B. S., Essai sur I'influence des boissons alcoholiques con- sideree comme causa de maladies. Paris, 1821. D. L. F., Traite theorique et pratique de Yinification ou I'Art de faire du vin ... les procedes de fabrication des vins factices, etc. Paris, 1824. Eolle, Pierre N., Recherches sur le Culte de Bacchus. Paris, 1824. Peges, C. F., Eecherches sur les phenomenes produits par I'intro- d action des liqueurs alcoolisees dans les voies digestives. (These pour doctorat. No. 128.) Paris, 1825. Pierron, Jean, Considerations chimiques the'rapeutiques et patho- logiques sur I'alcool. (These pour doctorat, No. 273.) Paris, 1825. Orfila, Mathieu J. B., Traite des poisons. Alcool, tome ii. pp. 449-457. Paris, 1826. , Elements de Chimie, tome ii. pp. 163-177. Paris^ 1831. — ■ — , Traite de medecine legale. Wine Adulterations, tome iii. part ii. p. 996a. Paris, 1848. Barrion, Desire, Dissertation sur I'empoisonnement par I'alcool. (These pour doctorat, No. 62.) Montpellier, 1827. 550 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Laharthe, E., De I'influence de I'alcohol dans la production des maladies, etc. Paris, 1829. Esquirol, Jean E. D., Des maladies mentales. Paris, 1838. Hoyer-CoUard, H., De I'usage et de Tabus des boissons fermentees. (These de concours.) Paris, 1838. Fuster, Joseph J. N., Des maladies de la France dans leurs rapports avec les snisons ou histoire medicale et mcteorologique de la France. Paris, 1840. Villerme, Louis Itf-ne, Tableau de I'etat physique et moral des ouvriers. Paris, 1840. Floureiis, Marie J. P., Eecherches experimentales sur les proprietes et les fonctions du systeme nerveux. Paris, 1842. Buret, Antoine Eugene, De la misere des classes laborieuses en Angleteire et en France. Paris, 1840. Michea, Claude F., Du Delire des Sensations. Paris, 1846. Bouchardat et Sandras, De la digestion des boissons alcooliques et de leur role dans la nutrition. In Annales de chimie et de physique, 3e serie, tome xxi. p. 446. (Aunuaire de therapeu- tique.) Paris, 1847. Lucas, Prosper, Traitd philosophique et physiologique de I'heredite naturelle, etc. Paris, 1847-1850. Marcel, Claude N. S., De la folie cnnsee par I'abus des boissons alcooliques. (These pour doctorat.) Paris, 1847. Bumeril et Demarquay, etc., Eecherches experimentales sur les anesthetiques. Paris, 1848. Tardieu, Auguste A., Observations medico-legales sur I'etat d'ivresse. Paris, 1848. Lahourt, L. A,, Eecherches historiques et statistiques sur ITn- temperance, etc. Paris, 1848. La Borderie Boulon Leonard P., De la pneumonic consecutive a I'intoxication alcoolique. (These pour doctorat.) Paris, 1849. Bergeret, Louis F. E., De Tabus des boissons alcooliques, de ses funestes efifets sur Thomme et la societe. Lons-le-Saulnier, 1851. Brierre, de Boismont, Alexandre, Des Hallucinations. Paris, 1852. , Du suicide et de la folie suicide. Paris, 1856. , L'lleredite au point de vue de la medecine legale. (Annales de Hygiene.) Paris, January, 1875. Ducket, Dictionnaire de la Conversation. (Article Alcohol.) Paris, 1852. Beuregard, F. V., Causeries villageoises sur les dangers moraux physiques et sociaux qui resultent de Tabus des liqueurs fortes. Paris, 1853. Falret, J., Eecherches sur la folie paralytique ot les diverses paralysies genurales. (These pour doctorat.) Paris, 1853. Lassegue, P., De Talcoolisme chronique envisage dans ses rapports BIBLIOGEAPHY. 551 avec la paralysie f!;enerale : Archives generales de medecine, 5 serie, tome i. Paris, 1853. Beber, Leon, De ralcoolisme chroniqiie. (Tliese pour doctorat.) Paris, 1853. Burdel, E., De I'lvrognerie et ses effets desastreux, etc. Bourges, 1854. Belbecq, C, De Tinfluence des boissons aclooliques sur la sante. Paris, 1854. Flourens, P., De la Longevite Humaine. Paris, 1854. Le Teatotalisme, Kevue Britannique, tome ii. pp. 445, etc. Paris, 1854. Neveu-Berottrie, V., De I'abus des liqueurs alcooliques. (These pour doctorat.) Paris, 1856, Bernard, Claude, Lemons sur les effets des substances toxiques et medicaraenteuses, pp. 426-435. Paris, 1857. Compte Eeudu du Congres de bienfaisance de Franc for t-sur-Main. 1857. Morel, Benedict A., Traite des Degenerescenses physiques, intel- lectuelles et morales de I'espece humaine. Paris, 1857. , Traite des maladies mentales. Paris, 1860. , L'Heredite morbide progressive. (^Archives generales de medecine.^ Paris, 1867. Parent-Buchatdet, Alexandre, J. B., De la Prostitution dans la ville de Paris. Paris, 1857. Neyreraand, E. Be, De la necessite de reprimer I'ivresse. Paris, 1858. Motet, A. A., Considerations generals sur I'Alcoolisme. (These pour doctorat.) Paris, 1859. Thomeiif, Leon, Essai clinique sur I'alcoolisme. (These pour doctorat.) Paris, 1859. Bourgeois, L. X., Les passions dans leurs rapports avec la sante et les maladies. (L'Amour.) Paris, 1860. Bemeaux, Note relative a I'influence de Tivresse sur la fecondation. Academie des Sciences. Paris, 1860. , Sur rAlcoolismc. Note a I'Academie des Sciences. Paris, 1860. Bezwarte, Aime, De I'influence de I'abus des alcooliques sur la marche et le traitement des maladies agues. (These pour doctorat.) Paris, 1860. L'Allemand, Ludger, Perrin, et Buroy, Du Eole de I'Alcool, et des anesthesiques dans I'organisme. Paris, 1860. Leudet, Emile, Etude sur lictiere determine par I'abus des boissons alcooliques. Societe de biologic, 3e serie, tome ii. Paris, 1860. , Des ulceres de I'estomac a la suite des abus alcooliques Congres medico-chirurgique de Rouen. 1863. Bade, Victor A., De I'Alcoolisme. (These pour le concours.) Paris, 1860. 552 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Bouchardat, AdoJphe, Liqueurs fortes. (Entretiens populaires de I'association polytechnique.) 2e serie. Paris, 18(50. , De l'usa<2;e et de I'abus des boissous fermeutecs et des liqueurs fortes. (Conference de I'Association polytechnique.) Annales de therapeutique, p. 208. Paris, 1862. , L'eau-de-vie et ses dangers. Paris, 1863. , Traite d'hygiene publique et privee, basee sur I'etiologie." Paris, 1883. Issartier, F., De PAlcoolisme moderne, etc. Paris, 1861. Lebettf, V. F., Les Vins Nouveaux du Midi et du Nord, ou Part de les couper, colorer, desacider, bonifier, vieillir, clarifier, etc. Paris, 1861. , Traite de I'ainelioration des liquides tels que vins, alcools, eau-de-vie, liqueurs, etc. Paris, 1861. Robot, L., Du cidre, de son analyse, de sa preparation, de sa con- servation et des falsifications, etc. {Annales d'ffygihne publique et de medecine legale, He serie, tome xvi. p. 3.) Paris, 1861. Anselmer, Victor; De PEmpoisonnement par I'absinthe. 1862. Oontesse, Alphee, Etudes sur I'alcoolisme et sur I'etiologie de la paralysie generale. (These pour doctorat.) Paris, 1862. Douleveyer, N. P., L'ivrognerie, Seul moyen vrainient efficace d'y mettre un terme. 1862. Krans, L'alcoolisme et la phthisic. (L^ Union Medicale, seconde serie, tome xiv.) Paris, 1862. Launay, L'Alcoolisrae son influence sur la production de la phthisic et des troubles menstruels. (L' Union Medicale, seconde serie, tome xiv.) Paris, 1862. Lunel, Adolphe B., Traite de la Fabrication des Vins. Paris, 1862. Baudot, Marc A., De la Destruction de I'Alcool dans I'Organisme. {U Union Medicale.') 1863. Quelle, A., De I'utilitede medication alcoolique dans quelques etats morbides. Paris, 1863. Fournier, A., Alcoolisme. Le Nouveau Dictionnaire de medecine et de chirurgie pratique (tome i. pp. 617-689). Paris, 1864. Qirardin, J. P. L., Considerations sur I'usage et I'abus de I'eau-de- vie, etc. 1864. Jaccoud, Sif/ismond, Nouveau Dictionnaire de Medecine et de Chirurgie Pratique, tome i. Paris, 1864. , Sur I'Alcool, pp. 603-677. , Alcoolisme, pp. 617-689. (Fournier.) , Alcoolisme. (Pathologic Interne.) Paris, 1877. Lagarosfte, These de la folic alcoolique. Paris, 1864. Perrin, L'influence de I'alcool sur le mouvement de la nutrition. {Gazette des hopitaux.) Paris, 1864. , Action physiologiques de I'alcool. (Dictionnaire encyclopedique des sciences medicales.) Paris, 1865. BIBLIOGRAPHY. 553 Voisin, A., De I'etat tnental dans I'alcoolisme aigiie et clironique, etc. Paris, 1864. Behier, Lemploi therapeutique de I'alcool. (Dictionnaire ency- clopedique des sciences medicales.) Paris, 1865. Debourge, Le Buveiir, son present et son avenir ; le present et I'ave- nir de sa famille, de sa descendance et de la societe. Paris, 1865. Jolly, Paul, Etudes hygienique et medicales sur racool. {Bulletin de I'Acadende de Medicine, tome xxxv.) Paris, 1865-1S66. Lanceraux, E., Alcoolisme. (Dictionnaire encyclopedique des sciences medicales.) Paris, 1865. , Etude sur les alterations produites par I'abus des boissons alcooliques. {Gazette Medicate de Paris.) 1865. , De Talcoolisme et de ses conse'quences au point de I'etat pihysique, intellectuel et moral des populations. Paris, 1878. Legras, Arthur B., Contributions a I'emploi therapeutique de I'alcool. Paris, 1865. Payen, Anselm, Precis theoretique et pratique des substances alimentaires. Paris, 1865. Paige, Jacques, Delorme, et Bechamhre, A., Dictionnaire Encyclo- pedique des Sciences Medicales. , Sur I'alcool, pp. 579-615. , Sur I'alcoolisme, pp. 615-719. (Lanuraux.) , Les Alcools, pp. 719-724 (Tourdes), tome ii. Paris, 1865. Wurtz, Adolphe, Dictionnaire de Chimie (tome i. part i. L'alcool, pp. 104-160). Paris, 1865. Brillaud Laujardiere E., De I'lvresse consideree dans ses conse- quences med. legales. Paris, 1866. Gariel, Marius, Essai sur I'alcoolisme considere principalement au point de vue de I'hygiene publique. Montpellier, 1866. Juliano, Georges, Essai sur ralcoolisme. (These pour doctorat.) Paris, 1866. Laroiisse, Dictionnaire Universelle du xix. Siecle (tome i., article, Alcool). Paris, 1866. Artigues, L'armee, son hygiene morale. Paris, 1867. Foville, Archives generale. Paris, 1867. , La folic des grandeurs. Paris, 1871. Glandil, F., De la cirrhose alcoolique. Paris, 1867. Robert, Charles, De I'ignorance. (Conferences populaires a I'asile imperial de Vincennes.) Paris, 1867. Audhoui, Victor, Pathologic generale de I'empoisonnement par I'alcool. Paris, 1868. Bidard, P., De I'influence de I'alcool sur la temperature et le puis, dans la pneumonic. Paris, 1868. Faure-Favier, P. M., De Taction therapeutique de I'alcool. Paris, 1868. Motard, Adolphe, Traite d'Hygiene generale. (Tome i. p. 836, Boissons.; Paris, 1868. 554 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. NicoIIe, Eugene, De I'Abus des Alconliques. Rouen, 18G8. Nolta, Eecherches statistiques sur la progression croissants de la mortalite en Normandie. L' Union Medicale (serie 3, tome v. p. 801). Paris, 1868. Pascal, Charles, De ralcoolisme et de son intiuence sur le developpment et la marche des maladies. (These pour doctoral.) Montpellier, 1868. Bichard, lAhhe, Essai sur la Tempereuce. Paris, 1868. Baudrillart, II., Des Habitudes de I'intemperance. Paris, 1869. Bellencontre, Deux cnnemies de la sante. Des Boissons alcooliques. De I'abus du tabnc. (Conf. Hygiene.) Paris, 1869. Oodfrin, Alfred, De I'alcool, son action physiologique, etc. 1869. Hofer, Johann C. F., Historic de la Cliimie. Paris, 1869. Jung, E., Des effects physiologiques et therapeutiques de I'alcool. Paris, 1869. Magnan, V., Gazette des hopitaux, pp. 79, 82, 85, 100, 108. Paris, 1869. , Academie des sciences. Avril, 1869. , Receuil de medecine veterinaire. May, 1871. ■ , Annales med. psych., p. 302. Paris, 1874. - — — , I'Alcoolisme, des diverses formes du delire alcoolique et de leur traitement. Paris, 1874. Bergeret, Louis F. E., De I'Abus des boissons alcooliques. Paris, 1870. Cassaignes, A., Etude sur Taction physiologique et les effects therajieutiques de I'alcool. Paris, 1870. Peronne, Charles, De I'alcoolisme dans ses rapports avec le trauma- tisme. (These pour doctorat.) Paris, 1870. Bcaufume, de TAbus des liqueurs alcooliques comme cause de degenerescence physique et morale des peuples et des moyens d'}^ remedier. Paris, 1871. Chauffurd, Discussion sur I'alcoolisme. Paris, 1871. Despine, Prosper, Le Demon Alcool, ses effets desastreux sur le moral, sur I'intelligence, etc. 1871. Gosselin, Bxdletins de V Academie de Medecine, Paris, 1871, Hardy, Gazette des hopitaux, Compte rendu de I'Academie de Medecine. Paris, 1871. Legrand du Saulle Henri, Le Delire des persecutions. Paris, 1871. Verneuil, Bulletin de V Academie de Medecine. 1871. Bergeron, Rapport sur la repression de I'alcoolisme a I'Acaderaie de Medicine. Paris, 1872. Burill, Paul, De I'lvrognerie et des moyens de lacombattre. (These pour doctorat.) Paris, 1872. Marty, Germain, Contributions a I'^tude de I'alcoolisme. (These pour doctorat.) Paris, 1872. Marvaud, A., Etude de physiologic therapeutique. L'alcool, son action physiologique, etc. Paris, 1872. BIBLIOGRAPHY. 555 Marvaud, A.. Les aliments d'epargne alcool et boissons aromatiques. Paris, 1874. De la Gravite des Lesions Traumatiques et des operations cbirurgi- cales chez les Alcooliques. Paris, 1872. Arnauld, Jules, De I'alcool considaie comme source de force, etc. 1873. Bertrand, Edmond, Essai sur la moralite des classes ouvrieres dans leur vie privee. (Journal de la societe de Statistique, tome xiv. p. 93.) Paris, 1873. , Es^ai sur I'intemperance. Paris, 1875. Cambon, J. B., Conside'rations sur Temploi de I'alcool en thera- peutique medicale. Montpellier, 1873. Cranney et BoucauU, Commentaires de la lui sur I'ivresse vote Janv. 1873. Dagonet, H. De, Alcoolisme au point de vue de I'alienation mentale. 1873. , Traite des maladies mentales. (Boehm's Ziemssen's Hdb. xv. p. 51.) Gambvs, Lucien, De 1' Alcoolisme chronique termine par le paralysie geoerale. (Tliese pour doctorat.) Paris, 1873. LolUet, De I'alcoolisme comme cause de la paralysie generale. (Oazette des hopitaux.) Paris, 1873. Lunier, L., De TOrigine et de la propagation des societes de temperance. Paris, 1873. , De la prorluction et de la consomraation des boissons alco- oliques eu France et de leur influence sur la sante physique et intellectuelle des poinilations. Paris, 1877. Petit, Des Consequences funestes de I'ivrognerie, etc. 1873. Chagnaud, Anatole, Des causes de I'alcoolisme ; etude d'bygiene publiqne. (These pour doctorat.) Paris, 1874. ; Cuzent, Gillert, Des Boissons enivrantes chez les diOeren^xs peuples. 1874. Faugeron, G., De Temploi de I'alcool dans le traitement des Suites de couches. Paris, 1874. Gazin, A., De I'alcool dans les pneumonies adynamiques. Paris, 1874. Goy, L., De la pneumonic chez les alcooliques. Montpellier, 1874. Lefort, Joseph, Etudes sur le moralization et le bien etre des classes ouvrieres. Paris, 1874. • , Intemperance et Misere. Paris, 1876. Picard, Eugene, Dangers de I'abus des boissons alcooliques. Paris, 1874. Etude semerologique des inflammations du fi)i developpees sous I'iiifluence de Tabus des boissons alcooliques. Clin. Med. de I'hotel de Dieu (pp. 35-67). Kouen, 1874. Falin, De Taction physiologique et therapeutique de I'alcool. Paris, 1875. 556 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. Grancher, Snr la medication tonique par I'alcool. (These pour le concours.) Paris, 1875. Jouffroy, Medication par I'alcool. (These pour le concours.) Paris, 1875. Lorrin, Marc, Apercu general de I'Here'dite et de ses lois. (These pour doctorat.) Paris, 1875, Marfaing, Ernest, L'Alcoolisme considere dans ses rapports avec I'alienation mentale. (These pour doctorat.) Paris, 1875. Prevost, H., Etude clinique sur le delire alcoolique. Paris, 1875. Coutan, De rinfluence de I'accroiseraent du nombre des cabarets sur sante publique et la criminalite. Douai, 1876. Dubois, De I'influence des liquides alcooliques sur Taction des sub- stances tosiques. Le Mnns, 1876. Dujardin, Beawmetz, et Audege, Eecherches ex peri men tales sur les alcools par fermentation. (Presente a I'Academie de Medecine.) Paris, 1876. , Recherches experimentales sur puissance toxique des alcools. Paris, 1879. Gautier, A., Sur la colorisation frauduleuse des vins. (Annales d' Hygiene publique et de Medecine legale.) Paris, 1876. ■ , La Sophistication des vins. Paris, 1877. Targuet, Documents pour servir a I'histoire de I'ivresse et de I'alco- olisme. Paris, 1876. Goppebroder, Sur I'analyse des vins. 1877. Husson, C, Da vin ses proprie'tes, sa composition, sa preparation, ses maladies, etc. Paris, 1877. Picque, Dr. L., Essai de geographic medicale. Contribution a I'etude de I'alcoolisme. (^Annales d'Eygihie, tome 47, p. 369.) Paris, 1877. Pliant, Aime, De I'alcool et du tabac. Paris, 1877. Bitter, E., Des vins colores par la fuchsine. Paris, 1877. Baudrimont, Marie V. Ernest, Dictionnaire des alterations et falsifications des substances, aliinentaires medicamenteuses et commerciales avec I'indication des moyens de les reconnaitre. Sur I'alcool, ])p. 88-106. Du vin, pp. 1209-1289. Paris, 1878. Garaudeaux, De la phthisic chez les buveurs, et de ses rapports avec la cirrhose du foie. (These pour doctorat.) Paris, 1878. Homais, M., L'Alcoolisme. Paris, 1878. Rahuteau, A., Des Alcools et de L'Alcoolisme. Paris, 1878. Compte-rendu du Congres Intcrnationnl pour I'Etude des Questions Relatives a I'Alcoolisme tenu a Paris, 1878. Believes, L., Rapports cliniques et anatomo-pnthologiques de alco- olisme avec le paralysie generale. Paris, 1879. JJaller, A., Theorie generale des alcools. Paris, 1879. Mttman, M., Etude sur les Legislations Euvopeenes relative au debits de Boissons Alcooliques. Paris, 1879. Congres International pour I'Etude des Questions Relatives a BIBLIOGRAPHY 557 I'AL'oolisrae. (Tenu a Paris du 13 au 16 Aout, 1878.) Paris, 1879. L'lvrognerie ses effets sur Tiadividu, la famille, et la Societe. Rouen, 1879. Lassegue, C, Les Troubles visuels de ralcoolisme. {Archives Generales de Medecine, tome cxliv. p. 342.) Paris, 1879. Chevalier, L., De la Pneumouie chez les alcooliques. QThese pour doctorat.) Paris, ]8i;0. Comptes Piendus du Consves International de Medecine Mentale tenu a Paris du 5 au 10 Aout, 1878. Paris, 1880. Oendron, E., Alcoolisme Hereditaire. (These pour doctorat.) Paris, 1880. Dumouly, M., Eecherclies cliniques et experimentales sur Taction hyjiothermique de I'alcool. (These pour doctorat.) Paris, 1880. Liston, Note sur une nouveUe forme d'alcoolisme latent professionel et sur le moyen de la combattre. (^Annales d' Hygiene publique et de Medicine Legale.') Paris, 1880. Millet, J., De I'lnflueuce Etiologique de I'Alcoolisme sur la paralysis generale progressive. (These pour doctorat.) Paris, 1880. Blanc, Leon Eraile, Traitement des Abces chauds par les injections d'alcool. (These pour doctorat.) Paris, 1881. Lacaille, A., De la Pseudo-Paralysie generale alcoolique. (These pour doctorat.) Paris, 1881. Moreaux, Marche de la paralysie generale chez les alcooliques. (These pour doctorat.) Paris, 1881. Eoitx, J., Etude sur les Piapports de TAlcoolisme et de la Phthisie Pulmonaire. (These pour doctorat.) Paris, 1881, Ardouin, Conferences sur L'Alcoolisme. Paris, 1882. Baron, A., Le Pauperisme. Paris, 1882. Billaud, J., De I'Alcool Pur employe comme Topique Piesolutif dans les Inflammations aigues. (These pour doctorat.) Paris, 1882. Lailler, A., Da Cidre. Paris, 1882. dartre, R., Traitement des abces chauds par I'incision limite avec injections d'Alcool. (These pour doctorat.) Paris, 1882. Vogelin, M., Contribution a I'Etude du Purpura Alcoolique. (These pour doctorat.) Paris, 1882. Gal, H., Recherches sur le passage des liqueurs alcooliques a travers des corps poreux. Comptes rendus des seances de L' Academic des Sciences. Paris, Nov. 1882, Jan. 18S3. Henry, L., Sur quelques derives phrenoliques. Comptes rendus des seances de L'Academie des Sciences, April. Paris, 1883. Jaillet, J., Modifications que subit I'alcool, introduit dans I'economie. Paris, 1883. Menschutkine, N., Sur les deplacements mutuelles des bases dans les sels neutres, les systemes restant homogenes. Comptes rendus des seances de L'Academie des Sciences. Paris, 1883. 558 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. AUSTRIA. DucheTc, A., Ueber das Verhalten des Alkohols im tliierischen Organismus. ( Vierteljahrschriftfur diepraJdische Heilkunde.) Prague, 1833. Rosenthiil, Moses, Tractatus de abusu Alcobolicorum. Yindobonas, 1839. Prochazl-a, J. G., De Morbis potuorum. Prngaj, 1842. Erigel, Joseph, Die Faufcrdyskrasie. Zeitscbiift d. K. Gesellscbaft d. Aerze zu Wien., 1845. , Aiileitung zur Beurtheilung des Leicbenbefundes. Wien., 1846. FeuchtersJehen, Ernst von, Lehrbucb der iirztlicben Seelenkunde. Wien., 1845. BoJcitansJcy, CarZ, Handbiicb der patbologiscben Anatomic. Wien., 1846. Artm'inri, Ferdinand, Die Lebre von den Nabrnngsmitteln, ibrer VerRilschung iind Conservirung, etc. Prag, 1859. SchJossar, Speise und trank vergangener Zeiten in Deutscbland. Wien.. 1877. Bersch, Jospf. Die Entstebung des Weines. £inz, Carl, Alcobol, Akobolismus. Wien., 1880. Ganghofner, Ueber d.Einfluss, d.Alkobols auf den Menschen. Prague, 1880. BELGIUM. Canoniero, P. A., De Admirandis vini vertulibus. Antverpias, 1627. Guislain, JosepJi, Traite sur les pbrenopatbics. Bruxelles, 1835. Buret, Antoine Eugene, De la misere des classes laboiieuses en Angleterre et en France. Bruxelles, 1843. Compte Rendu du Congies de bienlaisance de Bruxelles. 1856. Bouquie-Le/ebvre, Des causes et des resultats de Tin temperance. (Received tbe gold mednl, worib 30) fr., offend by Mr. Dutrune at tbe Frankfort Conf., but be gave tbe value of it to tbe poor of Frankfurt.) Bruxell' s, 1858. Frere-Orhii.n Hubert J. W., De TAbns des Boissons Enivrantes. Eenseiinements deposes a la Cbambre des Pepresentants. BruxeUes, 1868. Jansen, Avgude, De I'Influence dans nutre climnt de I'Usage et de I'Abus des Alcooliques sur la sante de I'ouvrier. (Couronne par la Societc de Medecine d'Anvers.) Anvers, 1872. BIBLIOGRAPHY. 559 Jansen, Auguste, De Tusaae et de Tabus des alcooliques dans rarmee. liruxelles, 1876. , De Tabus des Alcooliques dans la classe aisee. (Analyse par M. Du Moulin, Bulletin \de la Societe Medecine de Gand, xW. 464-466.) 1878. , Ue Tusage et de Tabus des boissons et des liqueurs alcooliques. Manuel d'instruction populaire recoramande par TAcademie Royale de Medecine et par le Ministre de la Guerre. Kamur, 1880. Haech, F., Memoire sur les cause des effets bienfaisants, et les causes des effets nuisibles des boissons alcooliques. Bruxelles, 1872. Falin, De Taction physiologique et therapeutique de Talcool. Anvers, 1874. La Societe Callier pour la moralisation des Classes laborieuses par Tepargne. Gand, 1874. Becelaere, Danger de I'abns des boissons alcooliques, etc. Congres internationale d'liygiene. Bruxelles, 1876. Desguin, V., De Tabus des Alcooliques, ses causes, ses re'sultats, ses remerles. Bruxelles, 1877. Barella, Hipp., De Tabus des Spiritueux, etc. Bruxelles, 1878. , Los Alcools et TAlcoobsme. Bruxelles, 1880. Rapport a M. le Ministre de Tlutei ieur sur la question de TAlcoolisme. (Bull, de V Academic Boyde de Medecine de Belgique, tome xiii. p. 1083.) Bruxelles, 1879. Congres Internationale pour TEtude des Questions Relatives a TAlcoolisme. Bruxelles, 1880. Belannois, Les MalaHes des buveurs. Bruxelles, 1880. Bulleiin de V AsRociatioa Belije contre VAbus des boissons Alcooliques. BruxeUes, 1882 to 1884:'. HOLLAND. MalinJcrot, Dissertatio ebrietatis pathologia. Traj. ad. Rh. 1723. Ueufel, Von, Dissertatio de Vindemia et torcularibus veterum Hebrfeorum. Ultrajecti, 1755. Schurmmm, De effecLibus liquorura spirituosorum. Harderovii, 1791. Sinclair, J., Handbuch der Gesundheit, etc. Amsterdam, 1808. Fuhri, A. D., De potuum S()irituosorum affectibus in corpus humanum. Lugdimi Batavorum, 1849. Schroeder vand der Kalk, J. L. C, Voorlezing over den inloed van sterlven drank op bet ligchaam. Utrecht, 1850. Euydecoper, De Tabolition des boissons fortes. 1867. Florent Van der Ven, Het misbruik van sterke dranken. Almanak 560 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. van de Xederlandsche vereeniging tot afschaffing van sterken drank. Anvers, 1873. De Volksvriend, journal hebdomadaire publie par I'Association neerlandaise contre I'usage des boissons fortes. ITALY. Baimundus, Lullius, De secretis Naturae seu quinta essentia. (Said to have written some sixty treatises on chemical subjects.) Venetiis, 1486. Beroaldus, Philippus, Declamatis Ebriosi, Scortatoris, Aleatoris de Vitiositate disceptantiura. Bononige, 1499. Arnaldus, de Villa Nova, De Vinis. Venetiis, 1506. Praefectuf^, Jacobus, Symposium de Vinis. Romas, 1536. , De Diversorum vini generum natura liber. Venetiis, 1559. Cornaro, Leivis, De Vitte Sobri^e Commodis. Padua, 1558. Cagnatl, Marsilio, Variarum observationum libri quatuor. Eomse, 1587. Bacci, Andrea, De natural! vinorum bistoria, de vinis Italias, et de conviviis antiquorum, libri septem. Romaj, 1596. Saldi, J. F., De natura aquse vitse. Genua3 (Genoa), 1620. Caldera, Oasper De Heredia, Tribunal, medicum, magicum, et politicum. Lugduni Batavorum, 1658. Carlucci, L., Dissertazioni chymicofisiche sopra I'analise del vino. Napoli (Naples), 1756. Fontana, Fdice, Richerche fisicbe sopra il veleno della Vipera. Lucca, 1767, Bosellini, N. F. I. B., I Monumenti dell' Egitto e della Nubia. Pisa. Part L, vols, i., iv., 1832-1841. Part II., vols, i., iii., 1832-1836. Part III., vol. i., 1844. Tagliabue, Antonio, II Suicide. Milano, 1871. Bonchi, J. et Salvioli O., Studio critico-sperimentale intorno ad alcune particolaritse del-lazione fisiologica dell' alcool. Modena, 1875. Gain, Vitaliano, Absintismo. Memoria. . . . Con Alcuni appunti del Professore F. Coletti e risposta dell' autore. Padova, 1877. Venuti, Filippo, Dissertazione de' coli vinarij degli anticbi. Terzi, Ernesto, Della ubbriacbezza in Italia et dei mezzi per rimediarvi. Milan, 1878. BIBLIOGKAPHY. 561 RUSSIA. Pallas, Peter Simon, Reise durch verschiedene. Provinzen des Ruszischen Reichs, Bd. i. p. 315, etc., Coumiss. St. Peters- burg, 1771-1776. Salvatori, Comment, pathol. et therap. de ebriositate. (Comment. Soc. Phys.) Mosquensis, 1821. Lipinski, C, De actionepotionum spirituosorum in corpus humanum. Cracovife, 1839. Strauch, E., Demonstratione spiritus vini in corpus ingesti. Dorpat, 1852. Masing, E., De mutationibus spiritus vini in corpus ingesti. Dorpat, 1854, Hermann, Ueber den Missbrauch geistiger, Getranke in Russlaude Vortrag im Verein Deutscher Aertze in St. Petersburg, Nov. 13, 1867. St. Petersburgher medicinische. Zeitsclirift, xiii., B. s., 65. St. Petersburg, 1867. Zimmerherg, H., Untersuchungen iiber den Einfluss des Allvohols auf die Tbatiekeit des Herzens. Inaugural dissertation. Dorpat, 1869. Granfelt, A. A., Nvkyajan Raittiusliike. (The Temperance Move- ment of Our Time.) Helsingfors, 1883. SWEDEN. Linne, Carl V., Anmarkningar om Briinvin. Stockholm, 1748. Ball, Stephen, Formaning till Branvins-supare. Stockholm, 1754. Wallerius, J. G., Dissertatio de prima vinorum origine causali. Holmia3 (Stockholm), 1760. Linnceus, Carl V., Dissertatio academica inebriantia. Respond. 0. R. Alander Upsaliaj, 1762. Bergius, Petrus, Dissertatio in qua spiritus frumenti proponitnr. Dpsaliaj, 1764. Westerdahl, Fr., Branvinets ode i S verge. 1765. Neikter, J. F., De Vini usu foeminis iiomse interdicto. Upsalite, 1789. Erikson, G., Om Branvinet och des missbruk. Norrkoping, 1831. , Om Branvinets inflytande pa meniskokroppen. Stockholm, 1831. , Om Branvinets Nytta och Skada. Mariestad, 1838. o Ekman, 0. Clir., Nagra Ord om Branvinets Bruk och Missbruk. Calmar, 1839. Husg, Magnus, Alcoholismus Chronicus. Stockholm, 1849, (Vol. ii. 1851.) .. Smiih, L. 0., Oj^pet bref till Sverige's Arbetare. Stockholm, 1883. 2o o62 THE FOUNDATION OF DEATH. SWITZERLAND. Savonarola, M., De Arte conficiendi aquam vitse simplicem et com- positam deque ejus vi admirabiliad conservandam sanitatem et corporis humani ajgritudines curandas. Basiliaj, 1597. Zimmermann, Johann G. von, Der Erl'ahrung iu der Arzneykunst. Zurich, 1764. Pictor, Sermon medico practicse (vol. ii. Haller Bibliotheca). Bernse, 1776. Lehmann, Ueber die Folgen des Missbrauchs der geistigen Getranke. Bern, 1837. Hitzig, Eduard, Ziele und Zwecke der Psychiatrie. Ziirich, 1876. Stierlin, R., Ueber Weinfalschung und Farbung. Bern, 1877. , Das Bier, seine Verfiilschungen und die Mittel, solche nachzu- weisen. Bern, 1878. Sell, E., Ueber Bier und seine Vertalschungen. Bern, 1878. MEXICO. Moreno, J., E Apuntes sobre el empleo therepeutico del Alcohol. Mexico, 1871. INDEX OF AUTHORITIES. A Adamson, Eev. Dr., 346, 393 Albany, Dnke of, 331, 417, 432 Albncassis, 30 Alden, Henry M., 13 Allemand, Dr. L., 89, 93 Alliance News, 154 note, 239 note, 256, 341, 354 note, 355, 371, Appendix 647 Amyot, 174 Andersen, 30 Anstie, Dr., 107, 120, 359 Aristotle, 31, 34 Armstrong, Sir William, 372 Arnot, Hon. David, 351 note Asiatic Jourjial, 27 note Athensens, 17 Avicenna, 30 Aodige, Dr., 96 B Bacon, Lord, 174, 226 Baer, Dr., 28, 33, 55, 67, 82, 101, 123, 176, 280, 281, 321, 332, 333 Baker, W. M., 60 note Balfonr, Mr., 442 , Eight Hon., 356 note Balzac, Honore de, 226 Barry, Eev. Edward, 174 Bartley, Mr., 400 Basset, 38 Bauer, Professor J., 89 Baxter, Dr. J., 316 Bayly, Mary, 252, 380 , Captain, 380 , Mrs. George, 380 Beaumont, Dr. Thomas, 204 , Dr. W., 74, 93 Becamp, 43 Becquerel, Dr., 64 Beddoes, Dr., 123, 183 Beecher, Henry W., 230 Benson, Archbishop, 420 , Bishop, 310 Bergenroth, 308 Bergeron, Dr., 54 Bevan, Llewellyn D., 370 Bevington, Rev. A. C, 452 Billing, Dr. Archibald, 103, 204 Binz, Professor, 96 Blanqui, 408 Bock, Dr., 157 note Boetius, Hector, 23 Baker, Dr., 83 Bolas, 42 Bouchardat, Dr., 90 Bourgeois, Dr., 172 Bourne, Stephen, 235 Boussinganlt, 41 Bowly, Samuel, 320 Bowman, Dr., 72, 201 Boyle, R., 35 Branthwaite, Dr. H., 225 Bridgett, Eev. Father, 25 note Brinton, Dr., 53 British Medical Journal, 186, 207 Brockhaus' Conversationxicon, 38 note 5G4 INDEX OF AUTHORITIES. Tlrooke, Rev. Stopford A., 122, 323 Browne, Dr. J. Crichton, 113 Brunton, Dr. T. Lauder, 79, 92, 103, 104 Bnfeon, 230 BuUein, Dr. William, 309 Burdett-Coutts, Baroness, 387 note Burggraeve, Dr. A., 207 Burue, Peter, 425 Burns, Rev. Dr. Dawson, 234, 235, 240, 269 note, 311 , Mrs. Dawson, 360 B urton, Walter, 49, 52 Buxton, E. N., 399 C Caesar, Julius, 23 Caine, W. T., M.P., 253, 455 Camden, William, 309 Camp, Maxime du, 280 Campbell, T., 295 Cantile, Dr. James, 99 Carlisle, Bishop of, 422 , Lord, 387 , Sir A., 70, 218 Carpenter, Dr. W. B., 63, 84 note, 318 Cash, Thomas, 268 Cayley, Dr. William, 205 Cetewayo, 354 Chamberlain, Right Hon. Joseph, M.P., 278, 402 Channing, Rev. W. E., 166, 298, 395, 41 1., 428 Chapin, Rev. Dr., 437 Cheyne, Dr. George, 182, 328 note, 387 , Dr. John, 160, 183, 312 Christian, The, 368 note Christison, Professor, 106, 129 Church of England Teiwperance Chronicle, 375 Clark, Sir Andrew, 57, 121 Classical Journal, 17 note Clegg, Alderman, 452 Clouston, Dr. T. S., 272 Cobden, Richard, 414 Cole, Mr., 54 Coleridge, L(ird Chief Justice, 232 Collins, Sir William, 238 Colquhoun, Mr., 3 i3 note Connaught, Duke of, 432 note Copland, Dr., 316 Corbet, W. J., M.P., 272 Cowen, Joseph, M.P., 414 Crane, Rev. Dr., 291 Crosby, Rev. Dr. Howard, 278, 326 D Daily Chronicle, 381 Daily News, 52, 275, 355, 369, 405 Daily Telegraph, 51, 262, 296 note, 346 Darwin, Dr. Erasmus, 131, 174, 183 Davenport, W. Bromley, M.P., 132 Davies, Dr. 95 Davies, Dr. Pritchard, 270 De Foe, Daniel, 310 Delevan, E. C, 338 note, 425 Deacon, J. F., 341 Denman, James, 50 Denman, Mr. Justice, 232 Derby, Lord, 242 De Saussure, 41 Dionysius of Halicarnassus, 21 Disney, John, 229 note Dixon, Hepworth, 442 Dogiel, Professor, 72, 82 Donnat, Leon, 393 Dowse, Baron, 232 Draco, 20 Drysdale, Dr. C. R., 88, 131, 269 Dudley, Col., 46 note Du Halde, 28 note Dujardin-Beaumetz, Dr., 96 Dumarquay, Dr., 95 Dumas, 37 Dumeril, Dr., 95 Dunlop, John, 185 Duroy, Dr., 89, 93 E Eccles, A. E., 441 Echo, 42 note, 266, 339, 343 note, 383 note Edinburgh Review, 50, 53 Edmunds, Dr. James, 77 note, 78, INDEX OF AUTHORITIES. 86, 109, 128 note, 202, 216, 222, 225, 267 Edwards, H. E., 418 note Ellison, Canon, 341, 368, 419 Evening Standard, Til, 412 Exeter, Bishop of, 393, 426 F Fabius Pictor, 21 Fabroni, Adam, 8 note Farrar, Canon, 254, 344 Farre, Dr. J. K., 58 Figg, Dr. E. G., 91, 92, 94, 107, 121, 173, 175, 219, 283 Finkelburg, Dr., 282 Fiske, Professor John, 111, 120 Fitzgerald, Mr. Justice, 231 Flint, Dr. Austin, 63, 68, 85, 88 Flourens, Professor P., 58 Fliigge, Professor, 40 Forbes, Sir John, 103 Fournier, Alfred, 47 Frere.Orban, H. J. W., 275, 393 Friend, Dr. J., 30 Friend, The, 352 7iote Fuller, 338 G Ganghofner, Dr. F., 269 Garnett, Dr., 317 Garrod, Dr. A. Baring, 53, 131 Geber, 29 Gendron, Dr. E., 176, 280 iiote -George, Henry, 409 Gilbert, T., 444 Gilchrist, Dr., 271 Gladstone, Eight Hon. W. E., 231, 345, 400, 452 Globe, The, 370 Glynn, Rev. Carr, 456 Gordon, Dr., 317 Gould, Rev. Baring, 7, 9 Grimsby News, 412 Grindrod, Dr. Ralph Barnes, 23, 218, 316, 321, 433 Grove, Mr. Justice, 231 Gull, Sir William, 226, 266, 318 Guthrie, Rev. Dr. J., 32 note Gutzeit, 43 Haggenmacher, Otto, 15 Hale, Sir Matthew, 232 Hales, Dr., 83 note Hamburger, J., 10 Hamilton, Lord Claud. 438 Hammond, Dr. W. A., 79 Hancock, Rev. Dr., 204 Hare, Dr. Charles, 197, 374 Hargreaves, Dr., 275 Harnack, Dr., 199 7iote Harrington, Sir John, 310 Hart, Ernest, 186 Hawkins, Mr. Justice, 233 Hawksley, Dr. Thomas, 375 Headland, Dr., 103 Heath, J. P., 350 note Heaton, Mr., 271, 456 note Hermann, Dr. L., 57 Hermes Trismegistus, 31 Herodotus, 17, 58 Hewitt, Rev. Dr., 321 Hibberd, Shirley, 303 Higginbottom, Dr., 183, 195 Hinton, Dr. James, 92 Hoefer, 30 Holinshed, R., 182 Holland, Dr. J. G., 437, 444 Howard, Bronson, 447 Howie, Dr., 115 Hoyle, William, 234-238, 246-252, 269, 271 Hnddleston, Baron, 232 Huf eland, Dr., 158 Humboldt, F. H. A. von, 27 Huss, Dr. Magnus, 29, 33, 128, 141 Jaccoud, Professor Sigismund, 176 Jackson, Dr. Robert, 204 James, Dr., 183 Jeffreys, Archdeacon, 426 , Dr. Julius, 184 Johnson, Dr. Edward, 32 , Dr. James, 317 Jones, Edward, 243 Juvenal, 13 566 INDEX OF AUTHORITIES. K Kerr, Dr. Norman, 130, 177, 182, 184, 185, 265, 267, 372, 375 Keshub Chnnder Sen, 35-i King, Dr. T., 103 , Vice-Admiral Sir W., 297 note Kirk, Rev. John, 245 Kirkegaard, Soren, 299 Klein, Dr. L. A., 67 Koch, Dr. Albin, 64 Kolliker, 40 Kopp, H., 32 Kotzebue, 7 Kraft-Ebing, Professor, 140, 144, 149, 178 Kuyper, Herr, 94 Lactantius, 13 Lamb, Charles, 159 Lanceraax, Dr. E., 175, 281 Lancet, 55, 76, 190, 266, 313, 361, 371, 390 Latour, Cagniard, 40 Lavoisier, Antoine Laurent, 35 Lawson, Sir Wilfrid, 241, 345 Le Clerc, M., 30 Lecoint, Dr., 95 Lees, Dr. F. R., 8 note, 73, 322 note, 344 Leigh, Canon, 362 Leo Africanns, 29 Lewis, David, 238, 267, 344, 394, 442 Libavius, 33 note Licensed Victualler's Simple Guide, 27 note, 53 Liebig, Justus von, 40, 88, 97, 123 Lightfoot, Dr., 7 Livesey, Joseph, 331, 411 Livy, 21 Lockhart-Robinson, Dr., 269 Lorin, Dr. Marc, 172 Louisville Medical News, 42 note, 378 note Lullas, Raimundus, 30 M Macrorie, Dr., 317 Mann, Dr., 279 Manning, Cardinal, 258, 340, 396 Manu, 6 Marty, Dr. Germain, 231 Mason, Dr. Lewis D., 145-148, 149, 178, 279 Maudsley, Dr., 148, 176 Maury, Alfred, 12 M'Cabe, Cardinal, 168 note McCulloch, Dr., 53 McGee, Walter, 48 McKay, Mr., 353 note McMurtry, Dr. A. H. H., 187 Medical Temperance Journal, 24,186 Medical Times, 157, 207 Merriman, Rev. Mr., 112 Midrasch Rabboth, 10 Milton, John, 7 Mohl, Von, 36 Moister, Rev. W., 436 Morel, Dr. B. A., 174, 392 Morewood, Mr., 7, 8, 12, 19, 25 note, 27 note, 357 Morgenstern, Mrs. Lina, 384 Morley, Mr. S., M.P., 449, 451 Mossop, Dr., 112 Mount Temple, Lord, 419 Mulhall, Mr., 271 Miiller, Professor, 3, 36 Mundella, Right Hon. Mr., M.P., 399 Munroe, Dr. H. , 87 note, 192 Muntz, 41 Murchison, Dr., 129, 130 Myers, Dr. A. T., 206 N Nageli, 40 Napier, Sir Charles, 340 Nasse, Dr., 95 National Standard, 339 National Temperance Advocate, 342, 397 Newcastle Chronicle, 417 New York Herald, 278 New York Medical Record, 389 INDEX OF AUTHORITIES. 567 Nicol, Dr., 112 NicoUs, Dr. S., 208 Noble, John, 445 Orfila, Dr., 54 O'Shaughnessy, M., Q.C., 231 Ossington, Viscountess, 451 Owen, Sir P. C, 349 note Paget, Sir James, 87 Pall Mall Gazette, 152, 178 note, 190, 278, 306 note, 347 note, 384, 388, 394, 397, 442 Parkes, Dr., 47, 114, 124, 186, 197 note, 241, 379 note Parsons, Piev. B., 184 note, 185, 265, 425, 433 Pasteur, 40 Paul, C. Kegan, 320, 325 " Pedro Yerdad," 48 Peek, Francis, 407 Peligot, 37 Percy, Dr. Jolin, 94 Perrin, Dr. 89, 93 Pettenkofer, 45 Phillips, Wendell, 326 Plohn, Dr., 392 Pitman, Judge, 344 Plancy, Colin de, 10 Play fair, Dr. Lyon, 78 Pliny, 21 Powell, Mr., 276 Prideaux, 23 Priestley, 35 Front, Dr., 95 Packler, Prince, 433 E Rae, Robert, 189, 354, 429 Reade, A. A., 122 , Charles, 416 Redding, Cyrus, 48 Reid, Dr. J. C, 225 Rhazes, 30 Riant, Dr., 47 Richardson, Dr. B. W., 132 Richardson, J. G., 440 Ridge, Dr. J. J., 115, 120 Rig-Vedas, 3-5 Ritchie, Dr. J. J., ] 95 Robinson, W. B., R.N., 268 Rochester, Bishop of, 337 note Rodier, Dr., 64 Roebuck, J. A., 416 note Romanes, Professor, J. J., 303 Rosch, Dr. C, 174, 218 Roth, Professor von, 3 Rothschild, Lady de, 451 Rumford, Count, 383 Rassell, Lord John, 387 , T. W., 438 Rutherford, 35 S St. Matthew, 8 Salisbury, Lord, 401 Samuelson, Mr., 25 note Sanderson, Dr., 241 Sandras, Dr., 90 Sanger, 274 Saturday Review, 358 Saunders, Charles, 259 Savory, W. S., 101 yiote Scheele, 35 Schlegel, 269 Scholtz, Dr., 397 Schrick, Dr. M., 182 Schulz, Dr. C. H., 81 Schwann, 36, 40 Scientific American, 140 Sebright, John, 802 Seneca, 16, 22 Sewall, Dr., 317 Shaftesbury, Earl, 270, 387, 404 Shaw, Mr., 49 Shepherd, Dr. Edgar, 269 Sherlock, Frederick, 309 Sims, George R., 253, 254,363-367 Smith, Dr. Edward, 96, 222 , Rev. James, 169, 324, 426 note, 434 — , L. O., 384, 385, 386, 405 note , Dr. S. C, 203 Solon, 20 Son of Temperance, 378 note Spectator, The, 359 568 INDEX OF AUTHORITIES. Spencer, Herbert, 302 Spicer, W. J., 446 Spurgeon, Rev. C. H., 297 Startin, James, 130 Stawell, Sir W. F., 452 note Stephenson, George, 444 Stewart, Rev. Moses, 425 Strabo, 13 Strutt, Joseph, 428 Sturge, Joseph, 456 note Sturges, Rev. S., 450 note T Tabari, 11 Talmud, 7, 9 Taylor, 37 Temperance Record, 314 note, 362, 273 note, 381, 414, 423, 446 Temperance Review, 217 Temple, Sir William, 130 "Theoricns," 182 Thompson, Sir Hemy, 229, 317 , Dr. SjTnes, 201 Thomson, Dr., 31 , H. A., 275 Thudichum, Dr., 48 Times, The, 50, 190, 199, 231, 346 Todd, Dr., 72, 201 Toronto Glohe, 445 Trotter, Dr. Thomas, 106, 183, 217 Tryon, Thomas, 69 note, 295, 309, 386 Tapper, Sir Charles, 373 U Unkey, Rev. A. J., 352 note Victoria, Queen, 430 Villa-Novns, Arnoldus, 30, 31 Vizetelly, Mr., 49, 51, 55 W Wakley, Coroner, 259 Wales, Prince of, 431 Walter, Mr., M.P., 399 note Wells, Bishop of, 451 ; , Sir Spencer, 373 Westminster, Dake of, 451 Wetherbee, 54 Wei/mouth and Portland Guardian, 413 Whitaker, Dr., 7 Wilberforce, Canon Basil, 423, 426 Wilkins, Dr. E. T., 279 Wilson, Dr. James, 390 Wine Guide, 54 Wollowicz, Dr., 124 Wolseley, Lord, 339 Wood, Major. General Sir Evelyn, 340 Wookey, A. J., 352 note Wiinsche, Dr. Auguste, 11 Wiistenfeld, 30 York, Lord Mayor of, 429 Young, Dr. Edward, 275 Zsohokke, 337 INDEX. A Absinthe, 45 Abstainers and drinkers, relative longevity of, 268 Abstinence, importance of national conviction on, 307 pledge, worth and effective- ness of, 326 Acute alcoholism, 128 Adepts, the, 31 Adulterations, liquor, 46-56 ; aloes in beer, 55 ; bitter almond in, 46; buckbean in beer, 55 ; cocculus indicus in beer, 55 ; cocculus indicus in, 47 ; col- chicum used in, 47 ; colocynth in, 47 ; Colonel Dudley on, 46 note ; concoctions of alum in beer for frothings, 55 ; copper in, 47 ; copperas in beer for froth- ings, 55 ; essentia bina in, 47 ; ferrous sulphate in, 47; gentian in beer, 55 ; molasses used in beer for frothings, 55; oil of clove in, 46 ; oil of vitriol to give age to beer, 56 ; phosphoric acid the hop aroma in beer, 55 ; picric acid in beer, 55 ; port wine, 48 ; quassia in beer, 55 ; Ehine wines, 48; salt in beer, 55; sherry, 49 ; sherry. Times newspaper on, 50 ; stramonium in, 46 ; strichnia in, 46; sugar of lead in, 46; sulphate of iron used to give a bitter taste, 56 ; sulphuric acid in, 46 ; sweetwort used in beer for frothings, 55 ; tobacco in, 47 ; universality of, 46 ; water in beer, 55 ; wine, proposed treaty between England and Spain, Daily A^eivs on, 52 Africa, drinking in, 353 note Albncassis claimed to have dis- covered spirit distillation, SO Alchemists' belief in alcohol, reasons for, 31 Alcohol, a chief agent in shorten- ing life, 59; action of, on nerves, 102 ; a food, 66, 67 ; Dr. Ham- mond on, as a food, 79 ; reasons for belief that, is a food, 67 ; amyl, discovery of, 37 ; a nar- cotic poison, 106 ; as a cause of crime, 152 ; as a cause of prosti- ■ tution, 274 ; as a medicine, 181 ; as a medicine, British Medical Journal on, 186 ; as a medicine, Dr. Hare on decline in use of, 197; as a medicine, effects of use of, on mothers and offspring, 217 ; as a medicine, former and present opinions of, 198 ; as an anti- septic and anti-pyretic, 202 ; as an anti-spasmodic, 202 ; as a narcotic, 201 ; as a stimulant, 200 ; a subject for chemical investigation, 37 ; attitude of physicians on the subject of the use of, 65 ; believed to be a great agent for producing happi- 570 INDEX. ness, 289 ; body and mind poisoning, 306 ; Bright's dis- easeand, 129; conditions qnalify- ing length, extent, and character of alcoholic paralysis, 120 ; Prcf . Fiske on incipient alcoholic paralysis, 111 ; demands made by, upon the water of the system, 85 ; derivations of the word, 32 ; diseases caused by, 127-151 ; Dr. Farre's opinion on life being shortened by, 58 ; Dr. P. E. Lees on the effects of, on digestion, 73 ; Dr. Richardson's summary of diseases springing from, 132 ; during the campaign in 1812 in Russia, 96 ; effect on nervous system, 98 ; effect on temperature of the body, 95 ; effect on the will, 160; effects of, as a mental stimulant, 121 ; effects on blood, 76 ; effects on the eye, 112; effects on the physical organs and functions, 57-126; effects on stomach, 73; epilepsy from, 138 ; ethyl, dis- covery of, 37 ; evils of, during lactation, 218-224 ; during pregnancy, 219 ; first action of, made direct on the brain, 101 ; from smoke, 42 note ; general conclusions as to the narcotizing effects of, 121 ; general summary of the physiological results of, 125 ; heredity, or the curse on descendants by, 171-180 ; in bread, 42 ; influence of, on the blood, 81 ; inimical to life, 70 ; in living organisms, plants, and animals, 43 ; in the drawing- room, 358-367; in water, air, and earth, 41 ; meaning of alcoholic preservation of tissue, 80; mental phenomena due to, 141-151 ; methyl, discovery of, 37 ; mischief caused by, to blood-vessels, 86 ; Moderation in use of, 312 ; a greater virtue than abstinence ? 324; among the French, 322; definitions of, 313 ; effects upon temper and judgment, 321 ; entirely optional in our day, 312 ; no fixed standard possible, 312; practical worth- lessness of the plea of, 314 ; preparatory stage of drunken- ness, 316 ; publicans on, 313 ; various opinions on, 316-321 ; Natural sources of, 39 ; nerve paralyzing effects of, 114; ner- vous diseases from, 138; no right to be called a stimulant, 119 ; opinion of " Theoricus " on, 181 ; opinions of the judges on, and crime, 231 ; opinions on destruc- tive effects of, on society, 230 ; parallel effects of, on the nervous and muscular tissues, 100 ; paralysis from, 138 ; paralyzing effect of, on nerves, 105 ; physical effects of, in small doses, 115-120 ; powerful agent in restricting man to the life of the senses, 290 ; power of, over mankind, 293 ; presence of, in brain, 91, 93, 94 ; presence of, in breath, 91, 92 ; present in skin - evaporations, 92, 93 ; principal therapeutic uses of, 199 ; produces degeneration of blood, 82 ; prolific source of chronic indigestion, 73 ; reasons for alchemists' belief in, 31 reduces the capacity for work 123 ; retards digestion, 71 sensory disturbance from, 133 social results caused by, 226-282 specious reasonings concerning the use of, 305-330 ; spread of, 33 ; summary effects of, on digestion, 75 ; tendency of, to decompose into elements, 44 ; theories as to what becomes of it after entering blood, 88, 89 ; theories regarding the effects of, on the nerves producing the drink-craving, 120; three medi- cal declarations concerning, 184-186 ; origin of third medical declaration, 189 ; traceable in urine, 92, 93 ; tried by the tests INDEX. 571 of food, 68; twofold hurtful influence on nutrition, 71 ; two- fold narcotizing action of, on brain and nerves, 109 ; use of, during siege of Paris, 67; use of, in early times, 281 ; various names for, 32 ; women and, 358- 367. See also Alcoholism and Drink Alcoholic criminal activity, true field of direct, 157 criminality, examples of un- intentional, 156 drinking, physiological and mental results of, general sum- mary, 157 drinks, food elements in, 76 ; various, 45 dyspepsia, 133 epileptiform mania,Dr. Mason on, 149 fermentation, lethal nature of, 41 ; real nature of, first dis- covered, 40 hallucinations, crimes com- mitted under. Prof. Elraft-Ebing on, 149 infanticide, 266 insanity, 269, 279 ; Dr. Mason on, 145, 178 ; in Prussia, 281 ; in Russia, 282 mania, chronic, 149 ; its symptoms, 150 melancholia, chronic, 150 ; its painful delusions, 150 phthisis, 135 prescription, warning against, 225 prescriptions and their pre- parations, 199 treatment of typhoid fever, mortality from, 206 tremor, 140 Alcoholism, Dr. Huss the originator of the term, 128 ; gradual weakening and final destruction of character by, 163 ; general moral effects of, 168 ; one of the greatest causes of the depopu- lation and degeneration of nations, 176 ; origin and causes of, 283-304; transmitted to de- scendants under various forms, 177 ; analogy of acute, with insanity, Prof. Kraft-Ebing on, 144 ; divisions of acute, 145 ; Dr. Huss on acute, 141 Alcohols, groups and varieties of, 37, 38 ; sources of, found in drinks, 45 ; various uses for, 4i Ale, child mortality from use of, during lactation, 225 Al-Mokanna's death, 29 Almond, bitter, in liquor adultera- tion, 46 Aloes in beer, 55 Alum, concoctions of, used in beer for frothings, 55 American schools, temperance education in, 397 Amru, barbarities of, 25 Amusements, a check on drink and crime, 417 ; duty of the rich to provide innocent, for the poor, 417 ; reforming power and need of innocent, 414 Amylalcohol, discoveiy of, 37 Ancients, distillation unknown to the (excepting possibly the Chinese), 2; drinking among the, 1-24 Ancient wine traditions, 6-12 Anglo-Saxon power conquered by its intemperance, 337 Anne, Queen, free trade in liquors during reign of, 310 Antiseptics, comparative worth- lessness of, 203 Antwerp, water ordinance in, 387 Arabia, spirit distillation in, 29 Araca asa, a brandy distilled from koumiss, 45 Armv, Belgian, drinking in the, 338 note , English, importance of so- briety in, 337 ; Lord Wolseley on drink in, 339 ; Major-Gen. Sir Evelyn Wood's experiences, 340 Arrack, a brandy obtained from rice, 45 Artisans', Labourers', and General Dwelling Company, 412 572 INDEX. Association, the force of, 294 Assyria and drink, 15 Athens and drink, 20 Atmosphere always charged with ferments, 40 Australian schools, temperance education in, 397 B Bacteria, or micro-organisms, 39 note Bacchus, Noah thought to be original, 11 ; worship, 11-15 ; similarity between Greek and Egyptian worship, 12 Banks, Lord Derby on savings, 242 ; savings, school system in Sweden, 398; siiggestions for establishment of sober working men's, 405 Barley for malting purposes, re- fusal to sell, 456 Barmaids a cause of intemperance, 368 Beaumont, J. J., the case of, 296 note Bechuanas and drink, 352 note Bedfordshire, drunkenness and crime in, 153 Beer — Act, 357 ; adulteration, 55 ; aloes in, 55 ; alum used for frothings, 55; buckbean in, 55; cocculus indicus in, 55 ; Dr. Diysdale on, and gout, 131 ; drinkers, fat in, 78 ; Drs. Beau- mont and Brunton on fat in drinkers of, 79 ; drinking, 77 drinking during lactation, 224 gentian in, 55 ; molasses in, 55 oil of vitriol used to give age, 56; phosphoric acid in, 55; picric acid in, 55 ; quassia in, 55 ; sweetwort used for frothing, 55 ; salt in, 55, 77 note; Scientific American on general diseases resulting from, 140 ; sulphate of iron used to give the bitter taste in, 56 ; suljjhuric acids used to give age, 56 ; water in, 55 Belgian army, drinking in the, 338 note Belgium, drink question in, 275 Berlin, steam kitchen in, 383 Bessbrook estate, 438 Birmingham, public-houses in, 278 Blood, alcoholic degeneration of, 82 ; constituent parts of, 62 ; constitution of, 64 ; Drs. Becquerel, Eodier, and Albin Koch on constitution of, 64 ; effects of alcohol on, 76 ; in- fluence of alcohol on the, 81 ; the nature and twofold mission of, 62 ; theories as to what becomes of alcohol after enter- ing, 88, 89 Blood-vessels, disease of the, 135 ; mischief caused by alcohol, 86 Blue Ribbon movement, 449 ; Right Hon. W. E. Gladstone on, 452 ; significance of, 451 Botany originated by Aristotle, 34 Brain, first action of alcohol made direct on, 101 ; presence of alcohol in, 91, 93, 94; quahty of, decides the quality of its communicating power, 113 ; twofold narcotizing action of alcohol on, and nerves, 109 Bread, alcohol in, 42 Breath, presence of alcohol in, 91, 92 Bright's disease and alcohol, 129 British Medical Journal on alcohol as a medicine, 186 Buckbean in beer, 55 Burglar must be wary and cool, 165 C Calculus, 137 Cambyses and his cup-bearer, 17 Canadian schools, temperance education in, 397 Canterbury Convocations on drink, 229 Carbon, definition of, 38 Carbonic acid gas, 41 note; in coal mines, 42 Carthage and drink, 22 Cataract, 137 INDEX. 573 Catholic Total Abstinence League, 39G Cell theory established by Schwann and Von Mohl, 36 Cetewayo and drink, 354 Character, gradual weakening and final destruction of, by alcohol- ism, 163 Chemical elements, demonstration of, by Boyle, 35 ; of human body, 60 Children and drink, 297, 368-372 ; legislation against drinking by, 369 ; legislation for temperance education of, 393 Chinese supposed original dis- coverers of distillation, 27 Chronic alcoholic mania, 149 ; its symptoms, 150 Chronic alcoholic melancholia, 150; its painful delusions, 150 Chronic alcoholism, 128 Chui'ch, responsibility of the, in regard to drink, 417 Church of England Temperance Society, Bishop of Carlisle on its success, 422 ; origin and growth, 419 ; its purpose and mission, 421 ; versus grocers' licences, 362 Church proprietorship in public- houses denounced, 422 City of London Total Abstainers Union, 449 Clergy, responsibility of, in regard to drink, 417 Cocculus indicus in beer, 55 ; used in liquor adulteration, 47 ; a substitute for alcohol, 55 Cochineal used in colouring wine, 55 Coffee-tavern movement, 378 ; Daily Chronicle on, 381 ; Duke of Albany on, 432 ; History of, 379 Colchicum used in liquor adultera- tion, 47 Cold-bath treatment, summary of, 207 ; in typhoid fever, 205 Colocynth used in liquor adultera- tion, 47 Commune, results of drink under, 280 Compensation, in which all in- terests are satisfied, 349; pub- licans' side of the question, 348 ; to publicans, 347. See also Local option. Legislation, and Prohi- bition Confederacy of the Southern States, downfall of, 338 note Cooking, best system of, 385 Copper used in liquor adulteration, 47 Copperas used for frothing, 55 Crime, alcohol as a cause of, 152 ; amusements a check on, 417 ; opinions of the judges on alcohol and, 231-234 Crimes committed under alcoholic hallucinations. Prof. Kraft-Ebing on, 149 Criminality, alcoholic examples of unintentional, 156 Customs, drinking, 301, 428 ; origin and age of, 428; Queen's oppo- sition to, 429 Cyrus, visit of, to King Astyagea of Media, 16 D Dalrymple Home for the cure of habitual drunkards, 372 Darlington and Stockton Railway Company and temperance, 444 Declarations, medical, concerning alcohol, 184-186 ; origin of third, 189 ; opinion of press on, 190 ; wording of, 191 ; impression on public mind, 192 ; medical opinions on, 192 Delirium Tremens, 143, 147; Dr. Maudsley's description of, 148; its symptoms and general cha- racteristics, 147 Deluge, punishment for drunken- ness, 8 Diabetes, 137 Diet foL" nursing mothers, 222 Digestion, Dr. F. R. Lees on the effects of alcohol on, 73 ; retarded 674 INDEX. by alcohol, 71 ; summary effects of alcohol on, 75 Diocletian, barbarities of, 25 Dipsomania, or the craving for drink, 177, 178 Disease, definition of the term, 127 Diseases caused by alcohol, 1 27-1 51 ; due to the use of alcohol, Prof. Christison on, 129; Dr. Eichard- son on, 132 Distillation, Chinese supposed original discoverers of, 27 ; defi- nitions of, 26 ; history of the discovery of, 25-33 ; unknown to the ancients (excepting pos- sibly the Chinese), 2 , spirit, 26, 27 ; Albucassis said to have discovered, 30 ; discovery attributed to the far East, 27 ; in Arabia, 29 ; old German legend attributes in- vention to the devil, 27 note; Ehazes, the Moorish physician, 30 Drawing-room and drink, 358-367 Drink, allegory of Mohammed, 23 note; among the ancients, 1-24; among the ancient Scots, 23 ; among the Vedic peoples, 3-6 ; amusements a check on, 417 ; a cause of insanitj' and suicide, 269; at the Adelphi, 415; black list of crimes due to, 227 ; Canterbury Convocations on, 229 ; children taught to, 297 customs, 301, 428 ; origin and age of, 428 ; Queen's opposition to, 429 , decrease of population in France caused by, 281 ; dis- tributing to crews, discontinu- ance of, 447 ; history in England, 308; in Assyria, 15; in Athens, 20; inBelgium,275; in Carthage, 22 ; in Egypt, 18 ; in Greece, 20 ; in Media, 16 ; in Normandy, 281 ; in Persia, 16, 17 ; in Komc, 20 ; in Sparta, 20 ; in Syracuse, 22 ; instance of power of, to anni- hilate the will, 160 Moderation in, 312 ; a greater virtue than abstinence ? 324; among the French, 322 ; defi- nitions of, 313 ; effects upon temper and Judgment, 321 ; entirely optional in our day, 312; no fixed standard pos- sible, 312 ; practical worth- lessness of the plea of, 314; preparatory stage of drunken- ness, 316; publicans on, 313; various opinions on, 316-321 Drink mortality, 265 and poverty, 245, 400 ; chief cause of poverty, 399 ; main- spring of poverty, 240 ; Dr. Channing on poverty with or without, 166 ; relations between, and poverty, 239 ; report of special sanitary commissioner on poverty and, 2G0 ; responsi- bility of rich in the question of, and poverty, 407 ; responsibility of magistrates, etc., in regard to, 417 ; results for England, 275 ; specious arguments on account of climate, 314; statistics, 234; the deadly enemy of human happiness, 167 ; traffic and its evils, 236. See also Alcohol Drinkers and abstainers, relative longevity of, 268 Drinking, and positions of trust, 445 ; fountains in London, 387 note ; habits, social, 436 ; mode- rate, 312 Drunkard, moral insolvency of, 161 Drunkards, cure of habitual, 375 Drunkards' children, condition of, 256 Drunkenness, analogy of, with in- sanity, 144; habitual, universally condemned, 312 ; qualified by the kind of intoxicant, 156 ; examples of, 157 Durham, di-unkenness and crime in, 153 Dyspepsia, alcoholic, 133 INDEX. 0/ o E Edgar, King, attempts to check intemperance, 338 Education, Dr. Channing's defini- tion of, 395 ; drink in its bearing on, 399; of the wealthy, 399 note ; poverty the worst enemy of popular, 399 ; temperance, in American, Australian, Canadian, and German schools, 397; public schools, 396 ; public money de- voted to, and war, 394 Egypt, drink and temperance efforts in, 18 Egyptians earliest brewers, 18 Egyptian worship of Bacchus, similarity between it and Greek, 12 Elderberries used in colouring wines, 55 Eleusinian mysteries, 13 ; abolished by the Emperor Herodosina the Great, 15 England, commencement of wine- drinking in, 309 ; drink history of, 308 ; drink results for, 275 ; hard drinking unknown in, until seventeenth century, 310 ; im- portance of sobriety in army and navy, 337 ; obligations of the Government in internal reforms, 335 English army, importance of sobriety in, 337 ; Lord Wolseley on drink in, 339 ; Major-Gen. Sir Evelyn Wood's experiences, 340 English nation, virility of, and drink, 308 Epileptiform mania, alcoholic, Dr Mason on, 149 Epilepsy from alcohol, 138 Erysipelas largely due to alcohol, 130 Esquimaux and alcohol, 96 Essentia bina used in liquor adulteration, 47 Essex, drunkenness and crime in, 153 Ethyl-alcohol, discovery of, 37 Eye, narcotic effects on, 112 Eyes, alcohol and the, 137 F Fermentation, discovery of, at- tributed to Jemsheed, 16 note; meaning and processes of, 39 Ferments, important role played by, 65 ; nature, action, and influence of, on life, 39 Ferrous sulphate used in liquor adulteration, 47 Fever, cold-bath treatment in typhoid, 205 ; mortality from typhoid, under alcoholic treat- ment, 20G ; Dr. Murchison on, 129 ; water-treatment in, 204 Food, alcohol as a, 66, 67 ; defini- tion of, 61 ; Dr. Hammond on alcohol as a, 79 ; elements in alcoholic drinks, 76 ; in alcoholic drink not in the alcohol, but in the residuals, 78; paraffin as a respiratory, 89 ; reasons for belief that alcohol is a, 67 ; sugar an important element of, 68 Foods, alcohol tried by the tests of, 68 ; broadly divided into three classes, 61 ; chemical division of, 62 ; division of the regular, 62 ; the process of nutrition, 63 Forbidden fruit, vine the, 7 Forger must be sober, 165 France, decrease in population of, caused by drink, 281 Freemasonry and temperance, 431 French, moderate drinking vrith the, 322 army, deterioration of, caused by drink, 280 Revolution, 408 G Geber on distillation, 29 Gentian in beer, 55 German schools, temperance edu- cation in, 397 Germany, a sixteenth-century temperance society in, 312 ; early moderation societies in, 332 ; reasons for their failui-e,333 57G INDEX. Ghazal, meaning of, 17 note Gia-drinker's liver, 130 Gout, Drs. Darwin, Drysdale, and Garrod on, 131 ; Sir William Temple on, 130; wines to be avoided in, 53 Grand Trauk Railway and temper- ance, 446 Grape, purple, origin of, 11 Graspers who succeed and who fail, 290 Greece and drink, 20 Greek worship of Bacchus, simi- larity between it and Egyptian, 12 Greenlanders and alcohol, 96 Griquas and drink, 351 note Grocers' Licence Acts, 357 ; G. R. Sims on social eiiects of, 363 ; protests in press against, 360 ; reasons for repeal of, 367 H Habit, force of, 295 ; because of natural laws, 295 ; becomes instinct, 300-303 ; difficult to break, 300; of evil, 299; of hereditary, 298 Habitual drunkenness universally condemned, 312 Hallucinations, crimes committed under alcoholic. Prof. Kraft- Ebing on, 149 Hampshire, prohibition in, 441 Happiness, alcohol believed to be a great agent for producing, 289 ; foundation of human, 167 ; missed by man's self-deception, 291 ; searching after, 285; what it is and how found, 293 Hastings, battle of, lost through drink, 337 Health, definition of the term, 127 ; drinking, 434 ; example of recuperative powers of body, 392 ; specious arguments on, and strength, 328 Heart, disease of the, 134 Heredity, or the curse entailed on descendants by alcohol, 171-180; diseases of alcoholic, Prof. Kraft- Ebing on, 178; Drs. Bourgeois and Figg on, 172, 173; Dr. Lorin on general laws of, 172 ; Lacteal, 178 note; scope of hereditary effects, 173 ; the laws of, a protection to the race, 171 ; various authorities on, 174 Home of the drunken wife and mother, 161 Homes for drunkards, 372-376 Horns, symbol of Bacchus, 13 Human body, chemical elements of, 60 ; quantity of water in, 63 Huss, Dr., the originator of the term alcoholism, 128 Hydrogen, definition of, 38 India, increase of drinking in, 353 Indigestion, chronic, alcohol a prolific source of, 73 Indra-worship, 4-5 Infanticide, alcoholic, 266 Infants, water for, 389 Insanity, analogy of drunkenness with, 144; on the increase, 272 ; tables showing the assigned causes of (.see Appendix) , alcoholic, 269, 279 ; Dr. Ma.son on, 145, 178 ; in Prussia, 281 ; in Russia, 282 Insomnia, 138 Instinct, 302 Intemperance, greater plague than war, pestilence, or famine, 231 ; juvenile, in Manchester and Liverpool, 368 Intention, difference between will and, 160 Intoxicant, qualifies kind of drunkenness, 156 ; examples of, 157 Intoxication, acts of, 291 Jews and drink, 23 INDEX. 577 K Kepler exti'act of maU, 380 vote Kidneys, alcohol and the, 137 Kirsch, a brandy from the black- berry, 45 Kissing women on the mouth, supposed origin of, 22 Knowledge, first graftings towai'ds, by means of the senses, 288 Koumiss — fermented milk, 45 Lactation, beer-drinking during, 224 ; child mortality from beer- drinking during, 225 ; evils of alcohol during, 218-224 Lamb's, Charles, pathetic warning, 159 Land nationalization, a cure for poverty, 409 ; examples of reasonable effects, 412 ; results of, without temperance reform, 411 Laplanders and alcohol, 96 Legislation, 367 ; dangers attend- ing, 337 ; dangers attending political agitation, 341 ; for poverty, 407 ; futility of, as a cure for poverty, 408 ; Habitual Drunkard's Act, 375 ; inter- national, on drink question re- quired, 376 ; liquor, 357 ; need of a national permanent drink commission, 377 ; obligations of British Government in internal reforms, 335 ; parliament and the drink question, 228 ; parlia- mentary report on drink in 1834, 241; Queen's speech (1883), 344 ; suggestions for alleviation of poverty, 401 ; temperance education for children, 393 Licences, restriction of the power of renewing, 367 Licensing, summary of history of, 357 Life, average limit of, 58 ; alcohol inimical to, 70 ; alcohol a chief agent in shoi'tcning, 59; Dr. Herman's idea of limit of human, 57 ; ignorance chief cause of brevity of, 59 ; nature, action, and influence of ferments on, 39 ; water of paramount im- portance to, 63; wisdom inherent in organic, 60 Liquor adulterations. See Adultera- tions, liquor Liquor-dealers, mortality among, 266 Liver, alcohol and the, 137 ; cir- rhosis or shrinkage of, 130 ; Dr. Murchison on functional di- seases of, 130 Liverpool, juvenile intemperance in, 368 ; social condition of poor in, 260 Local Option, 345; Sir Wilfrid Lawson's scheme, 345 ; Sir William Harcourt on, 346-347 Logwood used in colouring wine, 55 London, agitation for pure water supply in, 387 ; drinkiug-fouu- tains in, 387 note ; Bitter Cry of Outcast, 264 ; homes of the poor, 252-256 ; Horrible, 254 ; " How the Poor Live," 253 ; "Why should Loudon wait?" 262 Temperance Hospital, history and progress of, 208; origin, foundation, and work of, 209 ; summary oi all cases of typhoid fever treated in, 212 ; methods of treatment in, 216 Longevity, relative, of drinkers and abstainers, 268 Lord's Supper, intoxicating wine in the, 301 ; use of wine in, 423-428 Lullus, Raimundus, and spirit dis- tillation, 30 Lungs, disease of the, 135 Lupulit, a narcotic drink, 56 M Maci'obians in the time of Cambyses, 58 Madagascar, liquor prohibition of 2p 578 INDEX. Queeu of, 356 ; liquor treaty with, 355 Magistrates, responsibility of, in regard to drink, 417 Maliow-bloonr used in colouring wine, 55 Malt not so nutritious as grain, V8 extract a promoter of easy digestion, 379 note ; Kepler, 380 oiote liquors, Drs. Beaumont and Bruntou on the fat of drinkers of, 79 ; specially considered, 77 Malting, 45 v*' Man no longer dies, he kills ^ himself," 173 Manchester, drunkards' children in, 256 ; juvenile intemperance in, 368 Mania-a.potu, 143, 146 Mankind, divided into two great factions, 290 ; power of alcohol over, 293 Martha Washington Home, 374 note Media and drink, 16 Medical declarations concerning alcohol, 184-1S6 ; origin of third, 189 ; opinion of press on, 190 Medical profession, Dr. McMur- try's appeal to, 187 Medicine, alcohol as, 181-225 ; Britiah Medical Jotirnal on alco- , hoi as, 186 ; Dr. Hare on decline in use of alcohol as, 197 ; former and present opinions of alcohol as, 198 Melancholia, chronic alcoholic, 150; its painful delusions, 150 Mental phenomena due to alcohol, 141-151 results of alcohol, general summary of, 157 Methyl-alcohol, discovery of, 37 Middle Ages, drink in the, 25 Midland Kailway and temperance, 445 Milk instead of alcohol in hospitals, 198 , hot, a healthful drink, 378 note \ Moderation in drink, 312 ; no fixed standard possible, 312 ; entirely optional iu our day, 312 ; definitions of, 313 ; publicans on, 313; practical worthlessness of the plea of, 314; preparatory stage of drunkenness, 316 ; various opinions on, 316-321 ; effects upon temper and judgment, 321 ; among the French, 322 ; a greater virtue than abstinence? 324 societies, early, 332 Mohammedans and drink, 23 Mohammed's drink allegory, 23 7wte Molasses used iu beer for froth - ings, 55 Moral insolvency of drunkard, 161 Mortality among liquor-dealers, 366 ; from drink, 265 Murderer and drink, 165 Music, humanizing power of, 415 N Narcotic, alcohol as a, 201 Narcotics, 102 ; definition and division of, 105 ; the most im- portant, 104 ; various confiicting definitions of, 103 Narcotizing effects of alcohol, general conclusions as to, 121 National Tem])erauce Federation, plan and organization of, 452 ; National Tempei'auce League, labours of, 396 Navy, English, importance of sobriety in, 337 Nerves, action of alcohol on, 102 ; paralyzing effect of alcohol on, 105, 114 ; twofold narcotizing action of alcohol on brain and, 109 Nervous diseases from alcohol, 138 Nervous system. Dr. Cantilc on character and functions of, 99 ; effects of alcohol on, 98 ; physio- logy of, 98 New York Christian Home for Intemperate Men, 374 note INDEX. 579 New York city, rnm shops in, 278 Nitrogen and oxygen, discovery of, 35 Noah, said to be Saturn, 12 ; thought to be original Bacchus, 11 and Satan planting the vine, 9 Normandy, drink in, 281 Northumberland, drunkenness and crime in, 153 Nutrition, the process of, 62 O Oatmeal drink, 379 note Oil of clove in liquor adulteration, 46 of turpentine first obtained by Amoldus Villa-Novus, 31 of vitriol to give age to beer, 56 Organic diseases from alcohol, 134 Oxidation, discovery of the basis of, by Lavoisier, 35 Oxygen, definition of, 38 and nitrogen, discovery of, 35 Paraffin as a respiratory food, 89 Paralysis, conditions qualifying length, extent, and character of alcoholic, 120 ; from alcohol, 138 ; incipient alcoholic. 111 Parentage, responsibility of, 171 Paris, siege of, drink during, 280 Parliament and the drink question, 228 Parliamentary report in 1834 on temperance, 241 Pathological results of alcohol, 127-151 Patriotism, groundwork of all, 295 Pauperism, drink the mainspring of, 240 Persia and drink, 16, 17 Phosphoric acid the hop aroma in beer, 55 Plithisis, alcoholic, 135 Phj^sicians, responsibility of, in regard to driuk, 417 Physiology, in temperance re- form, 334 ; organic scientific, established, 36 ; originated by Aristotle, 34 Physiological effects of alcohol in small closes, 115-120; results of alcohol, 57-126 ; general sum. mary of, 125 ; physiological and mental results of alcohol, general summary of, 157 Picric acid in beer, 55 Pig, fable of drunken man and sober, 158 Poison, definition of, 64 ; division into two groups, 64 ; Poisons used in liquor adultera- tion, 47 Political agitation, dangers attend- ing, 337, 341 Port wine adulterations, 48 Poverty, caused by drink, 399, 400 ; drink the mainspring of, 240 ; futility of mere legislation on, 408 ; land nationalization a cure for, 409 ; Mr. Gladstone on, 400 ; propagation of, 372 ; State aid, 404 ; suggestions for alleviation of, 4<01 ; with and without drink. Dr. Chanuing on, 166 ; worst enemy of popular education, 399 and drink, 245-400 ; report of special sanitary commissioner, 260 ; responsibility of the rich in the question of, 407 ; relations between, 239 Pregnancy, evils of alcohol during, 219 Progress, human foundation of, 167 Prohibition — Artisans', Labourers', and General Dwelling Company, 442 ; Bessbrook estate, 438 ; dangers attending political agitation for, 341 ; estate in Tyrone, 438 ; in Hampshire, 441 ; initiary measures for, 345 ; in St. Johnsbury, Ver- mont, 443 ; in Saltaire, 441 ; in the town of Pullman, U.S.A., 443 ; Queen of Madagascar's 580 INDEX. pioclamatiou, 356; real estate compauies, 442 ; village of White Coppice, 441 ; wlien practicable and beneficent, 343. See also Local Option and Legislation Prostitution and alcohol, 274 Prussia, alcoholic insanity in, 281 Pseudo-stimulant, meaning of term, 105 Publicans, compensation to, 347; mortality among, 266 Public-house, proiDosal for a mission to start, 306 note Public-houses, Church proprietor- ship denounced, 422 ; low win- dows compulsoiy for, 367 ; pay- ment of wages at, 435 Public schools, temperance educa- tion in, 396 I'ullman, town of, prohibition in, 443 Q Quarterly Medical Temperance Journal established, 186 Quassia in beer, 55 Quicklime sometimes used in rectifying spirits, 47 E Kailway comijanies and temper- ance, 444 Eeal estate companies, prohibition in, 442 Rectification, 27 Refreshment Houses and Wine Licences Act, 357 Religion, man's self-deception in, 292 Ehazes, the Moorish physician, and spirit distillation, 30 Rhine wines, adulterations of, 4S Rich, duty of, to provide innocent amusement for the poor, 417; responsibility of, for the drink evil, 437 ; in question of poverty and drink, 407 Rig-Vcdas, the, 3 Robinson, Captain, the case of, 296 note Rome, results of intemperuucc in described by Seneca, 22; temper- ance efforts in, 21 Rome and drink, 20 Rum, recipe by Dr. Riant for making, 47 ; recipe for making old Jamaica, 47; spmt from sugar refuse, 45 Russia, alcohol during the cam- paign of 1812 in, 96 ; alcoholic insanity in, 282 S St. Johtisbury, Vermont, prohibi- tion in, 443 Salt in beer, 55, 77 note Saltaire, prohibition in, 441 San Francisco, Inebriates' home at, 373 note Santschu, a drink in China and Japan, 28 Sarcostemma acidum, 3 Sardanajjalus, motto of, 15 Satan and I^oah planting tlic vine, 9 Satyavarman, 12 Science, man's self-deception in, 292 Scotland, temperance reform in, 356 note Scots, ancient, drink among the, 23 Seneca, results of intemperance in Rome described by, 22 Sensory disturbance from alcohol, 133 Serpent woi'ship, 12, 13 Sherry, adulteration of, 49 Siam, liquor treaty with, 355 Silver King, 415 Skin, alcohol present in evapora- tions of, 92, 93; Mr. Startiu on diseases of, 130 ; vascular changes in the, 133 Sleeplessness and alcohol, 138 Smoke, alcohol from, 42 tiote Sobriety, Mr. Joseph Cowen on importance of, 414 ; relations between it and crime, 156 Social drinking liabits, 436 Society, general cllects of alcohol on, 226-282 ; opiuious ou dc- INDEX. 581 structive effects of alcohol on, 230 Soma, 3 ; real character of, 4 ; uniqae properties of, 5, 6 Sparta and driuk, 20 Spirit, definition of, 26 Stage, power and province of the, 415 Statistics, drink, 234 ; general value of, 226 Steam kitchen in Berlin, 383 ; in Stockholm, 38 i Stimulant, alcohol as a, 200 ; alcohol no right to be called a, 119 ; effects of alcohol as a mental, 121 Stimulants, 102 ; definition of, 105 ; divided into invigorators and prostrators, 105 ; the most important, 104 ; various con- flicting definitions of, 103 Stockholm, steam kitchen in, 384, 385 Stomach, Dr. Beaumont's ex- periments on the Canadian hunter's, 74 ; effects of alcohol on, 73 Stout, child mortality from use of, during lactation, 225 Stramonium in liquor adulteration, 46 Strichnia in liquor adulteration, 46 Sueves and drink, 23 Suicide, drink as a cause of, 269 Sugar, alcohol dei-ived from, 39 ; important element of food, 68 of lead in liqiior adulteration, 46 Sulphate of iron used in beer to give a bitter taste, 56 Sulphuric acid, in liquor adultera- tion, 46 ; used to give age to beer, 56 Sura, 4 ; a national ciu'se, 6 drinkers, penalties imposed upon, 6 Sweden, school savnngs-bank sys- tem in, 398 Sweetwort used in beer for froth- ings, 55 Syracuse and drink, 22 T Tafia, a brandy from molasses, 45 Temperance, foundation of na- tional regeneration, 411 ; Par- liamentary i-eport in 1834 on, 241 ; relative healthfulness of, and drink, 268 Temperance movement, abroad, 192 note and the aristocracy, 449 ; characteristics of modern, 333 ; commencement of modem, 334 ; medical history of, 182 ; the three medical declarations con- cerning alcohol, 184-186 Temperance reform, Ai-chbishop Benson on, 420; foundation in individual character and worth, 455 ; in Scotland, 356 note ; in- terest of Duke of Albany in, 432 ; interest of Prince of Wales in, 431 ; on railroads, 444 ; physi- ology in, 334 ; Queen's sympathy with, 429 ; vested in love, labotir, and humility, 456 ; why past efforts failed, 332 Temperature of body, effect of alcohol on, 95 Therapeutic uses of alcohol, prin- cipal, 199 Tissues, meaning of alcoholic pre- servation of, 80 ; parallel effects of alcohol on the nervous and muscular, 100 Toasts and health-drinking, 434 Tobacco used in liquoradnlteratiou, 47 plant, the forbidden fruit, 7 note Total abstinence a qualification for Church membership, 425 Trade customs, 435 uses of alcohol, 44 Traditions, ancient wine, 6-12 Tremor, alcoholic. Prof. Kraft- Ebing on, 140 Tyrone, prohibition estate in, 438 U United States, annual drink bill of, 275 ;_ liquor consumption of, 277; 582 INDEX. liquoi- industry of, 27G ; liquor revenue of, 277; statistics of public-houses in, 278 Urine, alcohol traceable in, 92, 93 Veclic people, drinking among the, 3-6 Vice, propagation of, 372 Villa-Novus, Araoldus, and spirit distillation, 31 Vine, legends of, 8 note; plant- ing edict. Emperor Domitian's famous, 22 ; the forbidden fruit, 7; planted by Noah, a sprig from Paradise, 8 W War and education, public money devoted to, 394 Washington Home of Chicago, 373 note Water, agitation for pure, in London, 387 ; bibliography of, by Dr. Plohn, 392 ; Drs. Becquerel, Rodier, and Albin Koch, on pro- portion of, in blood, 64 ; drinking, 390 ; drinking in 1498, 308 ; for infants, 389; functions of, 63; pure, greatest essential for life and health, 38G ; in beer, 55 ; of paramount importance to life, 63 ; ordinance in Antwerp, 387 ; quantity of, in human body, 63 ; scavenger of body, 84; thera- peutic properties of, 390 ; treat- ment in fevers, 204 Wealth, Dr. Channiug's true use of, 395 Wealthy, education of, 399 note West Lancashii-e Kaihvay Com- pany and temperance, 444 Westminster, Duke of, on temper- ance, 451 White Coppice, prohibition in, 441 Whortleberries used in colouring wine, 55 Will, clever disguises assumed by the alcoholized, 164; difference between intention and, 160 ; effect of alcohol on, ,160 ; in general life, 165 ; in political life, 164 ; in the relations be- tween master and man, 164 ; instance of power of drink to annihilate, 160 ; negative loss of, 165 ; positive loss of, 166 Wine, ancient traditions, 6-12; commencement of drinking, in England, 309 ; milk of Venus, 11 ; use of, in Lord's Supper, 423 Wines, adulterations of, port, 48, Rhine, 48, sherry, 49 ; fortified for export, 51, 52 ; fortified by potato spirit in London docks, 52 ; ills caused by drinking adul- terated, 54; Lajicef on nuti'itious elements in, 76 ; mallow. bloom, whortleberries, elderberries, co- chineal, and logwood used in colouring, 55 ; reasons for adul- teration of, 47 ; rectification with prepared chalk, 53 ; Spanisli, manufactured from raw German spirits, 52; Daily Telegraph on, 52 Wisconsin Central', Railway and temperance, 445 Women and alcohol, 358-367 Work, capacity for, reduced by alcohol, 123 Worth, human, foundation of, 167 Yeast fungi, generation of, 40 rKIN'JtU liY VMLIJAM CXOWhh A^D bONb. LlMlltU, LOMJON ANU liLCLLtS. i)^"^^ (^ 'MMlj^ ./^;^ ^ '> W- , mi j>'