UUlU|UHitlMUlluiHMmHHumiUHWUiwHMUi«»imiii»HunuinwnHH(iifwwuK(#j>iniiitfHi»iiMMiinuu
t"r.' ( t intff t iWl ll
l trr»n « »>t Wi:wT tTtf«Th'ttTtfrTrtTtrtnH^
intntiiiifMr^itoiHiiit.HfixiniilHUlUUriUlf)**'
Digitized by tine Internet Archive
in 2007 with funding from
IVIicrosoft Corporation
http://www.archive.org/details/chaoscosmosOOheerrich
CHAOS OR COSMOS?
CHAOS OR COSMOS?
BY
EDGAR L. HEERMANCE
NEW YORK
E. P. BUTTON & COMPANY
681 FIFTH AVENUE
1922
COPTRIGHT, 1922,
BY E. P. DUTTON & COMPANY
All BighU B^&erved
i •* *^'
/^9
IPrlnted 1b the Vnltod States of Amexloa
To
N. K. L. H.
COMRADE AND
COLLABORATOR
4865 i
PREFACE
Is the world in which we live a chaos, a welter of blind
forces and brutish passions ? Or is it a cooperative enter-
prise, through which Man and God are slowly working out
an order of justice and brotherhood ?
That is the question men are asking, with an impor-
tunity no previous age has known. We are coming to
distrust Materialism. As a philosophy of life, it has been
stifling moral and religious forces that are essential to
progress. It oifers no hope for the future. Selfishness
spells exploitation and class struggle. The idea of the
survival of the strong brought our generation to the World
War and its terrible aftermath. We have been passing
through a period of intellectual panic. Many current
theories of the world have gone into bankruptcy. What is
to take their place ?
The relation of man to the Universe must be approached
today in the attitude of the scientist. For the modem
mind, knowledge is not something fixed and final, but a
series of approximations. Some men still take their opin-
ions on authority. Abstract philosophers continue to treat
ideas as if they were the only realities. In this book we
shall make inductions from the concrete facts given us by
science and human experience.
Though not a biologist, my studies have compelled me
to take the biological point of view. Man is an organ-
ism ; his life, physical and mental, is a process of adapta-
tion. To reverse Descartes' dictum: I think, therefore
Something is, to which my mind is seeking to adjust itself.
And that Something is the vast external Universe, which
forms my environment. It is of little importance to know
the exact source of our ideas. They may be built up out
vii
viii PEEFACE
of sense impressions ; they may be due to revelation or to
some special intuitive faculty. The real question is, what
our ideas are good for, how far we can use them to know
our Environment and control its forces. All fruitful
thinking is a form of biological adjustment. What we
call Truth and Certainty are the degree of our success.
That truth is a matter of utility is the ruling principle
of what is known in the philosophic den as Pragmatism.
One weak point in the work of this school should be cor-
rected. It has had no criterion for judging whether an
idea has practical value, it gave no valid reason why a
theory is true because it works. There is a biological test
and a biological reason. Whatever in our experience, or
in the arranging of our experience, constitutes a genuine
adaptation to the Environment, is true to that extent.
Science and Philosophy, Religion and Ethics, are phases
of the same fundamental process. They represent our
human attempts to know the world and fit ourselves to
its conditions. Any experience, idea or theory which
enables us to do that successfully, has a survival value.
Our method carries us one step further. The conditions
which determine man's adjustment in its various aspects,
should throw light on the nature of the Universe. We
must adapt ourselves to a particular kind of world. What
is that world ?
For an answer to this question, it is not enough to inters
rogate the astronomer or the biologist. Our survey must
be as broad as life itself. A certain foreshortening in my
treatment is thus explained. Much more space is given to
those problems which involve man as a social unit. The
earlier chapters on the natural sciences are necessary for
a proper perspective, but they have been kept within a
brief compass. In order to do this, I have assumed some
familiarity with recent scientific progress. Detailed re-
views and discussions, given in my former book on The
Unfolding Universe, have not been repeated. To a cer-
tain extent the present volume covers the same ground.
PREFACE ia
But from an entirely different angle. Then, in seeking
to understand the Universe, we led up through the Phys-
ical, Organic, and Psychological fields, to the explanation
given by Religion. In this book we take the Christian
religion as a working hypothesis, and test it by application
to the Universe of our daily experience.
Our survey, after the opening chapters, takes on the
character of a pilgrimage. We pass through various
regions of human activity, stopping long enough in each
to apply the hypothesis of a cooperative and moral Uni-
verse. The aim is to gain an interpretation of man's
world taken as a whole, which may serve as a basis for
social ethics. For this purpose a horizontal treatment is
necessary. We cannot follow the vertical treatment of the
historian. The function of History is to serve as the
testing ground for ethical theories, rather than their
source. Mr. Wells' excellent Outline, for example, was
preceded by a long series of social studies. He had drawn
conclusions as to the meaning of what man is doing, long
before he tried out these conclusions through a study of
what man has done. Unless one has a solid basis of ethical
theory, the reading of History is largely meaningless.
I have tried to select material that is most obvious and
unquestioned, avoiding controversy, speculation and pre-
diction. If any one wishes to do battle with me, it must
be on the ground of what the material means, the induc-
tions to be drawn from it. I offer no apology for using
the records of dairy cows or the elimination of yellow
fever at Guayaquil as evidence on a problem in Philos-
ophy. In studying national behavior, the attempt is made
to secure completed reactions of recent date. For indi-
vidual and industrial relations I have taken my examples
from America, where they could be studied at closer range.
Those living in other countries may cut off similar cross
sections of our common world. If the tone of an Amer-
ican writer is more optimistic, a less clouded sky may give
a clearer observation.
X PREFACE
We shall study social experiences because of the bearing
they may have on the character of the Universe. Our
immediate concern is with principles rather than with
programs and applications. It will be well for the reader
to keep this distinction in mind. I realize how inadequate
is the treatment of many questions. This is due to the
necessity of keeping a balanced discussion of so wide a
field, as well as to my own limitations as a student. I
have sought to atone for it to some extent bj concreteness,
and by adding suggestions for further reading. In addi-
tion to the works cited in the text, many of the more
important chapters contain selected reference lists. Books
are chosen which give standard treatment from various
angles, and full bibliographies. I venture the hope that
many readers may be stimulated to follow the subjects I
have briefly sketched. They may thus gain something of
the zest of discovery which has been mine through the
studies of many years.
If I fail to discuss many philosophical or theological
problems, it is not because I consider them uninteresting,
or unimportant, or incapable of inductive treatment, but
simply because they do not fall within the scope of this
book. The most notable omission is the question of Per-
sonality. Just what human personality is, and how far
human analogies may be used to describe the God with
whom men are in relation, is a large and complex problem.
I do not mean to beg the question, but merely to postpone
it, for full discussion in a later volume. When an author
has the Universe on his shoulders, he may be pardoned for
not carrying more of the load than is absolutely necessary.
The rapid progress of Science during the past few years
makes it necessary to correct some of my former state-
ments of fact and interpretation. This is especially true
in the fields of Astronomy and Biology. The scientific
material on which our discussion is based is given in more
detail in the Appendix. An appendix, like a footnote, is
not intended to be read by people in general. It is a
PREFACE xi
morsel thrown out to the advanced student, to divert him
from criticizing the statements in the text.
My book is a series of sketches. A volume could be
written on the subject of each chapter. In some cases a
whole library is at our command, as I know only too well.
1 have not sought to strip the countryside of flowers, but
to gather samples of the most characteristic. The reader
might prefer another selection or arrangement He may
object to some of my attempts at botanizing. But the
flowers are from Nature herself; he may not criticize
them. If we do not like the facts of the Universe, we may
shut our eyes ; but the facts are still there.
E. L. BO.
'Nbw Haven, Conn.,
December 15, 1921.
CONTENTS
Introduction xv
I. Preliminary: Jesus' View of the Uni-
verse 1
A Statement of the Christian Hypothesis.
PART I. THE EXTERNAL UNIVERSE.
Problem a. Is the Universe Material or Spiritual?
II. The Passing of Physical Materialism . 19
III. God Restated 38
IV. Man's Communion with Nature ... 35
Prohlem h. Is Our Planet Unique?
V. The Earth and the Universe .... 43
Problem c. Was the Evolution of Ma/n> Accidental or
Natural?
VI. The Universe Unfolding 52
PART II. THE RELATION OF MAN TO THE
UNIVERSE.
Problem d. Monism or Pluralism?
VII. The Making of Man ....
VIII. Building the World of Thought
IX. Completing the Physical World
X. Developing the Food Supply
XL The Control of Health . . .
XII. Shaping the Course of Providence
jdii
65
77
87
95
105
116
xiv CONTENTS
PAET III. THE MORALITY OF THE UNIVEESE.
Problem e. Is the Universe cm the Side of Righteous-
ness and Goodwill?
Section 1. INDIVIDUAL RELATIONS.
XIII. The Place op Altruism 133
XIV. The Higher Selfishness 143
XV. Character as an Asset 153
XVI. The Cooperation of Prayer 167
Section 2. INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS.
XVII. Industrial War . 175
XVIII. Attempted Remedies 195
XIX. Democracy in Industry 211
Section 3. NATIONAL RELATIONS.
XX. National Aggression 231
XXI. Colonies and Trade 250
XXII. The Treatment of Other Peoples . . .264
XXIII. The Color Line .282
XXIV. The Growth of Common Interest . . . 294
XXV. The Future 311
Appendix A. Index to Bible Passages in Chapter
I 331
Appendix B. Recent Progress in Cosmogony . . 334
Appendix C. Habitable Planets among the Stars 339
Appendix D. The Emergence of a New Species 341
Appendix E. Chemistry and the Organism . . 342
Appendix F. The Evolution op the Organic
Machine 344
General Index 349
INTRODUCTION
Man is part of a Universe, to which his life is in per-
petual adjustment. In it he lives and moves and has his
being. The character of that Universe — its laws and
forces, its conditions of success and failure — is a matter
^of supreme importance to individuals and nations.
Many working theories of the Universe have been pro-
pounded. Some of these were direct attempts to explain
the world, put forward by philosophers or theologians, or
by scientific workers in various fields. Often the theory
t was little more than a fixed attitude of mind, an assump-
tion as to the world and man's relation to it, a pragmatic
creed by which actions were guided. Of these hypotheses,
many have failed because they did not account for all the
facts. Others furnished no 'sure guide to success in the
practical adjustment of men's lives to the world. The
theory was discredited because it did not work; the real
Universe was different from what was described or as-
sumed. A philosopher has argued from false premises,
which later cause the structure of his thought to come
tumbling down. A scientist has interpreted the Universe
from the standpoint of his own studies, and left out of
account the equally important contribution of other sci-
ences. A ruler ignores moral laws that are as inexorable
as gravitation, and ends at Amerongen or the guillotine.
A workman revolutionist kills the goose which lays the
golden egg. A minister of the gospel pictures the world
and man as he thinks they ought to be, not as they really
are, and people choose reality. A captain of industry
acts on a conception of human relations which makes them
mechanical instead of human, and Bolshevism lurks
around the comer. The shore is strewn with wrecked
XV
xvi INTRODUCTION
theories. In looking at tlie Universe, it behooves us all
to see it straight and see it whole.
Like many thinkers, in many lands, I have found my-
self turning for guidance to the great Teacher from whom
we date our calendar. The Christian religion, as a prac-
tical philosophy of life, defines God in terms of Jesus'
teaching, and affirms that the Universe is on the side of
righteousness and goodwill. Is this true ? Does the Uni-
verse really possess such a character ? That is the problem
which is before us for solution. The philosophy of Jesus
has the right to be tested, like other hypotheses, by experi-
ence and experiment. In fact his theory is being tested
today, not only by men and women in their individual
lives, but by institutions and nations. The result should
prove, as far as proof is possible, whether the Universe
is Chaos or Cosmos. My book attempts to gather and
weigh such evidence. It is intended to be inductive in
method and entirely open-minded in spirit. The Christian
teaching is accepted as a working hypothesis. To learn
how well it interprets the world as we find it — this is the
object of our quest
The Christian theory of the world is embodied in the
teachings of Jesus. [Chapter Jf.] Christ was a law-
giver, not in the sense of the legislator who enacts laws,
but of the scientist who discovers them. The truth which
he found, and proclaimed in the fact of bitter opposition,
was that of a Universe essentially spiritual, the manifesta-
tion of the ever present Father. This Universe is still
unfolding, and its completion requires the active coopera-
tion of men. Both as joint creator and as the object of
creation, the individual man is supremely important The
righteous and loving character of God makes integrity
and goodwill, not only the basis of Ethiea, but the clue
to practical success.
I am increasingly impressed by the philosophy that
underlies Jesus' teaching, his interpretation of the exter-
nal world in terms of God as Spirit This is more than
INTRODUCTION xvii
a doctrine of Divine immanence, as commonly understood.
For a generation, we have had a growing emphasis among
Christian writers on the idea of God in Nature. But
Jesus appeprs to me to put it the other way. He does not
sink God in Nature. He sees Nature as the direct activity
of God. He does not sharply separate the world from its
Author or Source. In a sense this is a revival of the older
Hebrew attitude. It stands in sharp opposition to the
dualism of God and the world which w© find in later
Judaism, and in the Latin stream of Christian Theology.
So much for our working hypothesis. Now let me out-
line the way it will be tested. Part I of our book is de-
voted to the Universe as a whole, without reference to the
problem of the individual. The antithesis of God and
His creation opened an unfortunate gulf between the re-
ligious man who emphasized God and the scientist study-
ing the material world. Is the Universe, of which we are
a part, essentially material or spiritual ? This is the first
of the five specific problems w'ith which our book deals.
We find a provisional answer [^Chapter 2~\ in the new
Physics, with its electrical explanation of Matter. The
collapse of physical materialism leaves the field clear for
the development of Jesus' idea of God's activity in Nature.
This conception of a dynamic Universe is common both
to recent Science and to the Christianity of Jesus. IChap-
ter ^.] The idea of God emerges from the vagueness of
speculative philosophy and practical dualism. If we see
Him at work in Nature, arguments to prove the existence
of a Divine Being become superfluous. Religion, in its
historic development, is seen as part of man's reaction to
the world in which he is placed, his attempt to adjust
himself to the Environment and come into practical rela-
tions with it.
I call special attention to this conception of Religion,
which I regard as of the greatest practical and theoretical
importance. The recent attempt of Durkheim, Overstreet
and others to identify God with Society, is mere theoriz-
xviii mTRODUCTION
\ ing. "Society" is an abstraction; it has no concrete ex-
istence outside of the individuals who compose it. Man,
in his religious experience, appears to be dealing with
concrete realities, many of them definitely grounded in
his physical environment. He undoubtedly projects him-
self on the Universe. The view he takes of God is shaped
by current social concepts.^ But no one who studies the
history of Eeligion from the biological standpoint, would
be likely to develop the Society-God theory. One is led
rather to the Environment-God hypothesis which I have
given. There is much truth in Leuba's statement that
"God is not known, he is not understood ; he is used."
I leave undetermined the theological question of the
relation between God and the extra-human Universe. The
whole problem of Personality, human and Divine, I hope
to discuss in a later book. For our present purpose the
question is not material. What we want to know is
whether we live in a Chaos or a Cosmos. I merely adopt
Jesus' point of view, as I interpret it, and regard the
Universe as one of the forms in which God reveals Him-
seK to men. Christ teaches us to look on the external
world, not as so much Matter or Force, but as itself a
manifestation of the God he interprets to us, and with
Whom he brings us into practical relations. This position
makes the Divine Being more definite and real than where
one holds to a sharp dualism of God and the world. At
the same time it brings Religion, Science and History onto
a common plane, where relation and logical induction are
possible. If, at some points in the book, I appear to iden-
tify God and the Universe, this use of language is intended
as rhetorical rather than philosophical.
To resume the thread of my argument, Man in his com-
munion with JSTature [Chapter U, a breathing spell from
intellectual problems], has found therein a solace, a spir-
itual symbolism, and a mystical exaltation.
*See my Unfolding Unwerse, chap. 18, The Social Stages of Re-
ligion.
IKTRODUCTION lix
Our idea of the Universe has been enormously expanded
by modem Astronomy. IChapter 5.] This introduces a
question Ox proportion, with regard to the earth and man.
IProhlem &.] The external world is still a unity. And in
this larger perspective, human life retains its intrinsic
value. The evidence at hand leads us to reject the possi-
bility of other inhabited worlds, from which the life of
our, planet might have been derived. We are thus thrown
back on the current scientific conception of life, as a more
complex development of the phenomena which we know
as physical. This position is in harmony with Jesus' idea
of Matter as an expression of God's activity.
The long evolution of life on our planet culminates in
the appearance of Man. [Chapter 6.] Was this a cosmic
accident, or was it a natural result of the forces involved ?
In other words, are we to accept the Christian postulate
of a definite goal in Creation? IProhlem c] The facts
do not bear out the idea of Ged as an Engineer operating
upon a world entirely distinct from Himself. Recent
Biology, however, appears entirely consistent with a dy-
namic Universe unfolding from within.
In Part II we take up the question of the Individual.
Is the Universe a strict Monism, in which the individual
human being is submerged? Or, as Christianity affirms,
has the Monism of the extra-human world become a Plur-
alism, a Republic of cooperating wills? [Problem d.~\
This problem is of so much practical importance, in view
of certain tendencies toward philosophical absolutism and
religious pantheism, that considerable space is devoted to
it. We waste no time discussing such abstract questions
as the nature of the will, or freedom versus determinism.
Taking man as an organism, in constant interaction with
the Universe which forms his Environment, we merely
ask what difference he is able to make in the net result.
Man's part in Creation is sketched, and the nature of
various human functions and activities. [Chapters 7 to
12,'] We find cumulative evidence that man, in his men-
XX INTRODUCTION
tal life, is not a part of God, but rather a unit actively
cooperating with God.
Part III deals with the problem of Morality. Is the
Universe to which man is seeking adjustment, and with
whose forces he is cooperating, to be considered as right-
eous and beneficent ? [Problem e.] Here again the evi-
dence is sought in the concrete rather than the abstract.
Section 1 covers Individual Relations. [Chapters IS to
15.'] Through a study of human behavior we seek to
determine the conditions in society which bring to the
individual the most favorable reaction. A review of per-
sonal and business relations shows that man is succeeding
in proportion to his recognition of character and mutual
service. Altruism, in the sense of trust and goodwill, is
seen to be an outgrowth of natural human instincts, which
form the basis of our social and economic life. Similarly,
self-control, honesty and justice must be regarded as com-
munity assets. Jesus appears to be justified in extending
honor and goodwill from narrower groups to society as a
whole. His conception of the laws and conditions of the
Universe is thus confirmed. Human society becomes a
higher form of cooperation between men and God, which
finds expression in the Christian conception of Prayer.
[Chapter 16,]
This idea of righteousness and goodwill as expressing
the character of the Universe, must be tested in the field
of broader human relations. The case method of Be-
havior Psychology enables us to study modem Industry
objectively and without conscious bias. [Section 2, Chap-
ters 11 to 19.] Our object is to determine the industrial
conditions which have produced the most favorable physi-
cal and moral reaction on the part of the worker. The
failure of exploitation, whether on the side of Capital or
Labor, and the success that has followed experiments along
the line of common interest, give strong confirmation to
Jesus' interpretation of the world.
In applying to the life of Nations [Section S, Chapters
INTRODUCTION xxi
20 to 23'] the same psychology of Behavior, we are break-
ing ground in a new field. The brief study which we are
able to make of national aggression, colonial management,
and the treatment of other peoples, indicates reactions
parallel to those in the industrial group. This result, even
if only tentative, is of the greatest importance. From a
pra9tical standpoint, the object of a nation must be to
act so as to secure favorable reactions from other nations
or from subject races. Turning to theory, we see that
there are moral laws of the Universe, which, like the laws
of mechanics or the laws of health, may be learned through
experience and experiment. And these laws apply to
nations as well as to individuals. The growth of commerce
has brought a rapid unification of the world. \_Chapter
2Jf,'] In national relations, whether official or unofficial,
the Christian principle of common interest finds increas-
ing application.
Summing up the evidence. [Oi^ap^er 25], we find that
the Christian attitude toward the Universe is essential to
modern civilization. Social progress is an achievement
rather than an evolution. Through a slow and painful
struggle, the race is learning to adjust itself to its Envir-
onment. The advance which has come through man's
knowledge and control of physical forces, only brings into
sharper relief his relative failure to know and control the
moral forces of the Universe. The true function of the
individual is found in his position as an independent and
cooperating unit. He is partner in a democratic cosmic
enterprise. And the objective of the age-long cooperation
between Man and God is the developing of human per-
sonalities. Promise of advance along this line is seen in
the lengthening of human life, the spread of democracy,
and the social solidarity introduced by the Industrial era.
And now, having spread out the menu, and as I trust
whetted the reader's appetite for what is to follow, let us
on with the dinner.
CHAOS OR COSMOS?
CHAOS OR COSMOS?
peeliminary: jesus' view op the universe
When the scientist faces a problem, he forms a working
hypothesis, and tests this by further observation and ex-
periment. In considering the question of Chaos or Cos-
mos, I propose to follow the same method. We shall start
with the idea that the Universe is an ordered Cosmos.
To make the idea more definite, let us take as its repre-
sentative the consistent and thorough-going statement
found in Christianity. The present chapter will develop
this hypothesis in some detail. In the remainder of the
book, we shall be occupied with testing Christianity as a
working theory.
The place to study the Christian idea of the Universe
is at its source. Increasingly there is borne in upon the
student the freshness, the modemness of Jesus. Though
the imagery of his statement is ancient and Oriental, he
seems to think much as we do today. This impression
is not merely subjective, or a result of our recovery of the
real Christ, beneath the whitewash of dogma. !N'or is it
enough to say that the universal form in which Jesus'
teaching is cast, has led each age to think of him as mod-
em, from its own viewpoint. We think in similar terms,
because the world of today is facing many of the same
social conditions and problems which Jesus faced in the
Roman Empire of the first century. Again, our modem
world is largely his creation. The civilization developed
1
2 ,;;,.; l "chaos ob cosmos?
in -Europe' since the close of the Middle Ages owes to Jesus
many of its formative ideas and emphases. Once more,
the progress of the natural and social sciences during the
past few years, has confirmed in a striking way certain of
Christ's most fundamental positions, as will appear in
later chapters. Whatever the source of Jesus' teaching,
the Master of men, to whom we trace our Christian civili-
zation, must rank as one of the great leaders, not only in
Religion and Ethics, hut in Constructive Thought.
Jesus was not a philosopher in the professional sense.
He was unfamiliar with the methods and teaching of the
Greek schools. His interests were practical rather than
theoretical. But in working out a program for the better-
ment of humanity, he has given us the outlines of a well-
rounded theory of the world, an hypothesis capable of
practical testing and proof.
Questions of literary criticism cause little difficulty.
Leaving out parallel passages, probably seventy-five per
cent of the material could be rejected, without affecting
the net result. Jesus' main principles are found in all
our sources. Comparative study enables us to make allow-
ance for editorial revision, and for the bias with which
his words are reported by one or another. The chief prob-
lem is to rid ourselves of preconceived ideas and of theo-
logical bias. Some appreciation of Oriental imagery is
needed, and a strong sense of humor, since many of Jesus'
statements are in the form of droll exaggeration. Follow-
ing Jiilicher's warning, the parables must be used pri-
marily for the truths they were intended to teach, and
only with great reserve for indications of Jesus' attitude
on other questions. In many instances we find phrases
and images which appear inconsistent with Christ's gen-
eral philosophy of life. If correctly reported, he used
them either because they were current, and so an excellent
vehicle for teaching, or because his thought had not been
worked out in logical detail.
We are concerned only with the philosophical or social
PKELIMINAKY: JESUS^ VIEW OF UNIVERSE 3
aspects of Jesus' teaching. These however made up the
bulk of his interest. He talks of God not as Pure Being,
but in relation to men. Personal salvation is closely
wrapped up with one's part in the Kingdom of God.
Jesus assumes a future life, but his immediate concern is
with the present life. I distinguish five main principles,
around which his teachings may be grouped.
1. The world in which we live is Divine. God is here.
We can detect His presence in Nature, and in human life.
His rule is a fact of daily experience.
Let us look first at Jesus' attitude toward E"ature. His
teachings are full of loving references to the natural world,
which show how closely he had observed it, how much it
meant to him. The sunset, the lightning, the mustard
seed, the harvest, the nesting birds, the foxes — these form
the basis for his homely parables and figures of speech.
Prom the pages of the natural world, Jesus reads the story
of the spiritual world. The wind blowing where it listeth
is not merely a wind. It tells him of the breath, the spirit
of God, coming, going. Sheep on the hillside are more
than sheep; they are the poor humans he is trying to
shepherd. The branches of the grape suggest the vital
relations between men and God.
It is to Nature that Jesus turns when he wishes to be
alone, alone with God. He seeks out some mountain, some
wilderness, some lonely garden. There he wrestles with
temptation ; there he renews his strength ; there he agonizes
in the crises of his life. Often Jesus takes the disciples
with him. "Come away to some wild spot," he says, "and
rest awhile." ^ Peter's confession is brought out amid
the mountain scenes near Csesarea Philippi. This com-
munion with God through God's world appears to have
been a habit with Jesus.
Not only is the physical world symbolic. Not only is
Nature a solace, and its silences the best approach to God.
But this natural world itself is God's world, throbbing
»Mk. 6:31.
4 CHAOS OR COSMOS?
with Divine life, filled with God's activity, revealing the
loving Father's thought and care. It is God who adorns
the lilies. The sparrows are fed by Him; not one falls
to the ground without the Father. For Jesus, as Stapfer
has said, the natural world is transparent, and through
every part of it, every event, shows the Divine Face. Not
an impersonal First Cause. Not an absentee God. But the
Father, living, near, beneficent. This attitude toward the
Universe has its practical side. Though sharing the limi-
tations of our common humanity, the Master does not
despair of his daily bread, even when there is no visible
means of its coming, shows no fear in the face of the tem-
pest on the Lake of Galilee, never sees in Nature anything
terrible or cruel.
This note is heard frequently in earlier Hebrew litera-
ture. Something of the same mystical element was un-
doubtedly present in the Pharisaic teaching, at its best,^
But the average pious Jew of Jesus' day appears to have
held a dualism of God and His world, which tended to-
ward externalism and materialism. God lived above the
sky, far removed from the world of His creation. This
holy and awful Being, whose very name was too sacred to
speak, acted on the world through His "Spirit," "Wis-
dom," or other intermediary. His intercourse with men
was carried on by angel messengers. God's will was law.
And this Law had been revealed in sacred writings, which,
by statement or inference, regulated the life of the chosen
people in its minutest detail. For the common man, the
emphasis, both in worship and conduct, was on the exter-
nal and physical. Religion was to him no longer a joy,
a good news, but a system of forms and rules, which only
the elect few were able to learn or carry out in their com-
pleteness.
Views as to the future were various and changing.
'See R. T. Herford, Pharisaism, 1912; C. G. Montefiori, Some
Elements of the Religious Teaching of Jesus, 1910; S. Schechter,
Some Aspects of Talmudic Theol., 1910.
PEELIMINAEY: JESUS' VIEW OF UNIVERSE 5
Man's life practically ceased with the death of the body,
though the soul was considered to be sleeping, or continu-
ing* a shadowy existence of happiness or misery in the
underworld. In the Resurrection, however, the body
would be revitalized and take part in its old activities.^
The good Jews would reign with the Messiah in a glorified
but still earthly Jerusalem.* The godless would be cast
into darkness and never-dying fire, either in Jerusalem's
city dump in the Gehenna valley, or in some celestial
parallel. Further speculation had begun to merge the
national hope into a world conflict between God and Satan.
Present and future stood in sharper antithesis. With the
final victory for the Kingdom of God, the sky and earth
would pass away. In their place would come a new order
of existence, still conceived as material in many of its fea-
tures. The heavenly Paradise, where the saints would
dwell with God, was to be separated by a great gulf from
the abode of the wicked. As yet the earth remained in
the hands of demons and other powers of Darkness, who
were the cause of sickness, Roman tyranny, and other
human woes. There was little hope of improvement, ex-
cept through the intervention of God on a cataclysmic
scale.'
Jesus' spiritualistic philosophy is in striking contrast.
God is Himself the ever-present Spirit, who may be wor-
shipped in any place. ^ He sees in secret, and is interested
in attitude and motive rather than external forms.'' Jesus
makes it clear that moral uncleanness is of the thought,
not of the hands.^ Our relations with God are personal ; ^
they are not on a business basis. ^^ He is the giver of
•Compare the Sadducees' reduction to absurdity in Mk. 12:18-23.
*Matt. 20:21; Acts 1:6.
■See W. Bousset, Relig. des Judentums im neutestamentUche
Zeitalter, 1903. An excellent summary is given by G. Hollmann,
Jewish Relig. in the Time of Christy Eng. trans., 1909.
•Jn. 4:21-24; Matt. 18:19-20.
'Matt. 6:21-37; 6:1-18; Mk. 2:23-27.
•Mk. 7:14-23; Lu. 11:37-41. Cf. Matt. 5:27-28.
•Matt. 6:1-18. ^oMatt. 20:1-15.
6 CHAOS OR COSMOS?
food," of health/^ of life/^ of character,^* of wis-
dom. ^^ The test of living is life.^^ Spirit is vastly more
important than body.^*^ The only death with which Jesus
is specially concerned is the loss of character. ^^ Life will
go right on without a break/ ^ future existence being an
emancipation of man^s spirit from the limitations which
the body imposes. ^^
For Jesus, the kingdom or rule of God is not merely a
hope and an ideal, but a present reality. It is at hand,^^
actually among men.^*^ People are pressing into it.^^ The
Kingdom is the world's harvest field,^^ the seed of the
future,^^ the thing of greatest present value,^^ the first
claim on a man's interest.^^ Already it belongs to the
receptive in spirit, and to those who have suffered for the
great cause. ^^ Jesus recognizes the weaknesses and fail-
ures of humanity, in the world as we find it.^^ But his
vision of the rule of God already begun, his confidence in
its future triumph,^^ has made him the great optimist of
history. We find denunciation and plain speaking, on
occasion, but no trace of cynicism, or of the censoriousness
that so often characterizes the reformer.
"Matt. 6:11; Mk. 6:41.
"Mk. 9:29.
»Jn.* 10:10; 5:40; 14:19.
"Matt. 6:13.
^''Matt. 10:19-20.
"Matt. 7:15-27.
"Matt: 4:4; 6:25; Lu. 12:15; Jn. 3:6.
"Matt. 10:28; Jn. 6:63.
"Mk. 12:26-27; Jn. 5:24; 8:51; 14:1-3; 11:23-26, a striking
contrast with the current Jewish view of resurrection.
»Mk. 12:24-25.
«Mk. 1:15; Lu. 10:11.
"Lu. 17:20-21; Matt. 12:28; 11:11.
»Lu. 16:16; Matt. 11:12.
«Matt. 13:37-38.
"Matt. 13:31-32; Mk. 4:26-29.
"•Matt. 13:44-46.
"Matt. 6:33.
*Matt. 5:3, 10.
»Matt. 13:18-30; Lu. 17:1.
••Mk. 9:1; Matt. 26:29; Lu. 10:17-18; 21:27-28.
PKELIMmAEY: JESUS^ VIEW OP UNIVERSE 7
With Jesus' sense of God's real presence, goes a joy in
living, an appreciation of wholesome physical pleasure, a
love of social fellowship, a breadth and fulness of life,
which remind us of the Greek religion at its best. Such
an attitude is like a burst of sunlight, by contrast with
the austerity of John the Baptist, or the cold formalism
of the average scribe. ^^ Asceticism appears out of place
in Christ's religion. ^^ He recognizes scholarship, and
endorses the search for truth. ^^ He shows the true gentle-
man's regard for proper conventions.^^ This genial temper
made Jesus welcome with people of all classes. Combined
with his self -forgetful service, it brought him a personal
popularity that often proved embarrassing.^^
2. Creation is incomplete. The Divine Universe is a
thing of slow hut certain growth. This idea of develop-
ment is suggested by Jesus in a number of passages. He
himself applies it in fulfilling, that is spiritualizing, the
Mosaic code.^^ Christianity is a new garment, not a mere
patching of the old.^'' The Kingdom of God is like yeast,
like the mustard seed,^^ the growing wheat. ^^ To him that
hath will be given.^^ God's spiritual order increases like
money well invested ; ^^ it represents a gradual achieve-
ment.*2
3. This unfolding Universe taJces its character from
*God.^^ Jesus represents and reveals Eim,^^ We are left
"Matt. 11:16-19; Jn. 10:10; 16:11.
'"Matt. 9:14-15; 6:16-18.
"Matt. 13:52; Jn. 16:12-13; 8:32.
"Lu. 7:36-50; dress, Jn. 19:23; church dues, Matt. 17:24-27.
Contrast with fasting, Lu. 5:33-39; ablution, Mk. 7:1-23; Sabbath,
Mk. 2:23-3:6.
^ITk. 2:15;" 12:37; 5:24; 1:36-38; Jn. 12:12-19; 6:15.
"Matt. 5:21-37; 19:8.
"Mk. 2:21. Cf. Matt. 11:11.
"Matt. 13:31-33.
» Mk. 4 : 26-29 ; Jn. 12 : 24 ; Matt. 13 : 3-9, 24-30.
^Mk. 4:25.
«Matt. 25:14-30; Lu. 19:12-27.
«Matt. 6:10; Lu. 10:9; 11:20.
*»Matt. 6:25-33.
**Matt. 10:32-33, 40; Lu, 10:22; Mk. 9:37; Jn. 6:17-47; 14:9.
8 CHAOS OR COSMOS?
with a very definite picture of the moral order in the
world.
God is on the side of integrity."*^ Those who hunger
and thirst for righteousness will be satisfied.*^ Purity of
thought is the door to God.*^ He stands for justice,*^ for
fidelity,^^ for courage,^® for self-control,^^ for honorable
peace, ^^ for consideration.^^
The heavenly Father loves, and expects love in return.'**
God is not a Despot, but the daily, hourly servant of
humanity.^^ He shows special interest in childhood.^® He
sympathizes with hunger,^'' with exhausting labor, ^^ with
poverty, ^^ with worry and fear.^^ God has compassion
on the ignorant and unorganized,^^ on the sick,^^ the
handicapped,^^ the sorrowing,^* the sinful.^^ In fact He
identifies Himself with human weakness and need.®^ God
yearns to save.^^ He expects men to share His sacrifice.^^
Good deeds are an advertisement of the Divine order in
the world.«9
God's world is essentially social. Jesus' hope is that
«Matt. 5:17-20, 48 j 21:12-13.
-Matt. 6:6.
«Matt. 5:8, 27-32.
«Mk. 7:6-13; Matt. 5:23-24; 23:1-36.
^Lu. 12:35-48; Matt. 25:21.
"Matt. 5:10-12; 10:22, 38.
*^Matt. 6:21-22.
"Matt. 6:9, 25-26.
"Matt. 5:7; 6:14-15; Lu. 6:36.
"Matt. 22:37-38; Jn. 14:21.
"Matt. 5:44-45; 6:25-33; 7:7-11; Lu. 22:24-27.
"Lu. 18:15-17; 17:2; Matt. 18:10, 14.
"Mk. 8:2; Matt. 25:35.
"Matt. 11:28-30. Cf. Mk. 6:3; Jn. 5:17.
"Lu. 6:20; Matt. 11:5; 25:36.
"Matt. 6:25-34; Lu. 12:4-7; Jn. 14:27.
«Matt. 9:36.
"Mk. 5:22-34; Matt. 25:36.
"Jn. 9:1-39; Matt. 9:27-30.
"Matt. 5:4; Lu. 7:13; Jn. 11:33-36.
"Matt. 9:10-13; Lu. 7:47-50.
"Mk. 9:37; Matt. 25:45.
"Lu. 15:1-32.
"Matt. 16:24; Jn. 12:25-26.
•Matt. 6:13-16.
PJRELIMIISrARY: JESUS^ VIEW OF UNIVERSE 9
men may be united with one another and with God.''^ The
model prayer is addressed to "our Father," not "my
Father." This term itself is full of social suggestion. The
sins with which Jesus is specially concerned are those that
tend to break up the Divine family: hatred, lust, pride,
covetousness, censoriousness, bad influence, selfishness, in-
justice. ''^ The "unpardonable sin" is shown by the con-
text to be the denial of the spirit of service.''^ God's pro-
gram for the world is a social program.''^ The term "King-
dom of God" occurs over a hundred times in the gospels,
including parallels. Jesus' use of the phrase suggests a
republic rather than an absolute monarchy.*^* Religious
institutions are of value to the Father in proportion to
their value for man.*^^
God's interest, however, is in the individual and not the
mass.'^^ Salvation is no national or racial reunion."^^ He
feels as the shepherd does toward the one lost sheep out
of the flock of a hundred, or the housewife toward the single
coin."^^ The very hairs of our head are numbered.''^ The
human soul outweighs the whole material world.^° One
little child may represent God, as the object of our serv-
ice. ^^ The individual will persist after the death of the
body.^^ This emphasis in Jesus' teaching corresponds
with his own case method. One of the Master's great
achievements was his valuation of the individual, not
merely as a social unit, but for his own sake, as a child
of God.
"Jn. 14:15-20; 17:11, 23.
"See Matt. 5:21-48; 18:1-9; 23:1-36; 25:31-46.
"Matt. 12:22-32.
"Lu. 4:16-21; 7:18-23.
"Matt. 17:24-26.
" Mk. 2 : 27-28 ; Matt. 12 : 1-8.
"Matt. 18:5-6, 12-14.
"Matt. 8:10-12; Jn. 8:33-44.
"Lu. 15:1-10.
"Matt. 10:29-31.
»Matt. 12:12; vl6: 26.
«Matt. 10:42; 18:5; 25:40.
"Jn. 5:28-29. Cf, Lu. 16:19-31.
10 CHAOS OR COSMOS?
4. The completion of the world requires the cooperation
of the Father and His human sons. At one end of this
relation, fruitful living demands close touch with God.^^
Human intelligence depends on God-given intuition.^* He
is the source of all possessions and endowments.^^ It is
God's Spirit which must change the unsocial man into a
good man.^^
On the other hand, human activity and enterprise are
essential.^ "^ Deeds are the road to truth, to love, to sta-
bility of character.^ ^ Jesus makes the disciples partners
in his program.^^ He shares to some degree his remark-
able control over natural forces,^^ and over the human
body.^^ Faith on the part of the patient is a condition of
Divine healing.^^ It is the attitude of trust which gives
free access to God's riches and power.^^ Practical social
service is expected of every man, in the course of the day's
work.^* The realization of God's rule is wrapped up with
such human endeavors. ^^ Workmen are encouraged to
yoke up with God.^®
Providence is cooperative. The man bom blind is not
a case of kismet; he was not being punished for his sins
or those of his parents. His blindness was there to be
cured. It was a defect in God's world which God was
eager to see remedied. ^"^ An accident calls for repentance
on the part of the community.^^ Increased food supply
"Jn. 15:1-8.
"Mk. 13:11; Jn. 16:7-13.
"Matt. 6:33; 25:14-30.
»Jn. 3:3-5; Matt. 12:32-35.
•"Matt. 7:7-8.
"Jn. 7:17; 14:21; Matt. 7:21-27.
"Jn. 17:18; Matt. 28:18-20.
•»Mk. 11:20-23; Jn. 14:12; Lu. 10:19.
"Matt. 10:1, 8; Lu. 10:9.
•"Matt. 9:22, 29, etc.
"Matt. 6:25, 33; Mk. 11:22-24.
••Matt. 25:31-46; Lu. 10:25-37; Matt. 10:42.
"Matt. 6:10; 10:7-8.
"Matt. 11:28-30.
•» Jn. 9:1-5.
"Lu. 13:1-5.
PEELIMINAEY: JESUS' VIEW OF UNIVERSE 11
requires human cooperation.^^ Man has a part in for-
giveness/^^ in sweetening human relations.^ ^^ Marriage
is a sacred relationship, to be shared by all who are able
to share it. The alternative is absolute control over sexual
instincts and imaginations.^ ^^ Men will be held respon-
sible for wrong moral conditions, particularly in the case
of the young. ^^^
Prayer is the recognition of this partnership between
man and God in the making of a world. "Our Father,
may Thy Kingdom come; may Thy will be done, Thy
plans followed, by me and by my brother men." ^^* We
do not need to secure God's attention or influence His
^jjjios Prayer is not to give God information. The
Father is so close to us that He knows what things we
have need of before we ask Him. He wishes us to ask,
because asking is a proof of our interest.-'^^^ To pray for
other persons means sharing His attitude toward those
persons. ^^^ The communion with God in prayer is direct
and personal.^ ^^ It is the cooperation of two harmonious
wills. When our plans coincide with His, there is no
limit to the possibilities of prayer. Whatever we ask in
Christ's name, that is in his spirit, we shall receive. ^^^
5. Because of the character of the Universe and the
solidarity of human society, it pays to he brotherly and
filial.
No man lives to himself alone. Even our daily speech
has eternal consequences. ^^^ The world owes its preserva-
"'Mk. 6:37-38; Jn. 6:8-9; Lu. 5:4-7.
*«»Mk. 11:25; Matt. 18:15-18; Jn. 20:21-23.
i*«Matt. 5:38-48.
^'^Matt. 19:3-12; Mk. 10:2-12; Matt. 5:27-32, 8.
"»Matt. 18:7-14.
*'**Matt. 6:9-10.
^''^Matt. 6:7.
^~ Matt." 6 :'8 ; 7:7-11; Lu. 18 : 1-8.
^•"Matt. 5:44-45; Lu. 23:34.
^"'Matt. 6:6; Lu. 18:9-14. Compare Jesus' own prayers, as given
in Matt. 11:25-26; Lu. 22:42; 23:34, 46.
^~Mk. 11:24-25; Jn. 14:13; 15:7.
""Matt. 12:33-37.
12 CHAOS OR COSMOS?
tion and its light, or the opposite, to our influence.* ^^
Actions return to us in kind.**^ Mercy and forgiveness
are reciprocal.**^ What affects one affects all. Each child
of the common Father is taught to pray : Give us this day
our daily bread; not. Give me this day my daily bread.
"Not simply, Forgive me my sins, the debts I have not
paid; but, Forgive us our sins, the sins of our common
humanity the world over, which weaken and impoverish
us all. Lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from
evil."*
Jesus advocates what might be termed the higher
selfishness. The great law of human relations is that you
should feel toward your neighbor and his interests as you
do toward yourself and your own interests, that you
should change places with him, in imagination, and treat
him as you would have him treat you.**^ Hatred is
damning.**^ We are to love our neighbors as ourselves.**''
And to love one's neighbor is simply to make his welfare
a common concern.*** To find our life we must lose it.**^
The way to receive is not to grasp but to give. Because
to give is to secure the goodwill of those around you, and
this in turn will lead to practical and substantial ex-
pressions of goodwill.*^^
Jesus teaches the folly of revenge. You never will over-
come evil, he says, by further evil, blow for blow, injus-
tice for injustice. You only make matters worse. You
pile two evils on the back of the community instead of
one, take a second angry man out of the ranks of ef-
ficiency. To submit to a blow or a personal injustice is
^Matt. 5:13-16; Lu. 11:33-36. Cf, Matt. 18:7-14.
«"Matt. 7:1-5; Lu. 6:37-38.
"'Matt. 5:7; 6:14-15; 18:21-35.
"*Matt. 6:9-13; Lu. 11:1-4.
>«Matt. 7:12-14; Lu. 6:31.
"«Matt. 5:21-22.
"'Matt. 22:39; Jn. 13:34-35.
""Lu. 10:25-37.
""Matt. 10:39.
^Lu. 6:38.* Cf. Mk. 9:41; Matt. 6:31-33.
PKELIMINARY: JESUS' VIEW- OF UNIVERSE 13
often better than to resist. There is less provocation for
further blows; there are fewer wounds to heal.^^^ The
only final remedy for wrong is to admit our enemy or our
rival into the order of goodwill. ^"^^
The lust for wealth or power or display, for their own
sake, is out of place in God^s spiritual order. Pride is
ridiculous, to any one with a strong sense of humor.^^*
Covetousness is tragic.^^* A man's life does not consist
in the number of things which he owns.^^'^ The standard
of living may be raised so high that possession becomes a
burden. There are higher values, which cannot be stolen
or corroded or eaten by moths, and which may be pr^
served without constant care and worry.^^^ Our heart
follows our investment. ^^"^ Jesus himself spurns the temp-
tation of easy money. -^^^ For the sake of freedom, he
practices the simple life,^^^ and commends it to others.^^**
Wealth is full of subtle temptations. ^^^ What does it
profit, to gain the whole world and lose your soul ? ^^^ A
divided allegiance is impossible; we cannot serve God and
Gold.^^^ Money may prove an impossible handicap, to
one seeking character, usefulness and happiness. ^^*
Human rights transcend the rights of property. ^^^ The
workman has a right to his wages,^^^ and the business man
to a reward for i^eoial ability and initiative. ^^''^ Inef-
ficiency is a disgrace. ^^^ But the sense of service rendered
transcends the pay.^^^ !N'o labor of man or woman need
be mere drudgery. ^**^ Fidelity should be a by-product of
^Lu. 6:29-30; Matt. 5:38-42, 21-26.
"2 Matt. 5:43-48; Lu. 6:27-36.
"3 Matt. 6:2, 16, undoubtedly exaggeration.
"*Lu. 12:13-21.
"»Lu. 12:15. »»Matt. 6:24.
"•Matt. 6:19-20. "*Mk. 10:17-25; Lu. 14:33.
"»Matt. 6:21. ««Lu. 8:26-37.
»» Matt. 4:8-11. "-Lu. 10:7.
«»Matt. 8:20. ^Matt. 25:14-23.
""Lu. 10:40-42. ""Matt. 25:24-30.
>«Matt. 13:22. "»Lu. 17:7-10.
"»Mk. 8:36-37. ""Lu. 10:38-42.
14 CHAOS OR COSMOS?
every business.^^^ All possession involves stewardship. ^^^
The chief value of money is to make friends, not by cor-
rupting but by enriching the lives of others.^^^ Failure
to do this makes the rich man pitifully and hopelessly
poor.^** The most rewarding hospitality is shown to those
who can make no retum.^^^
On the basis of brotherhood, Jesus teaches democracy
in human relations.^*^ The only aristocracy he recog-
nizes is the aristocracy of service. ^^"^ It is those who are
modest, and therefore teachable, who have the key to a
Kingdom.^*® The honor that comes 'to men is in inverse
ratio to their pride. ^^^ Jesus raises woman to a new plane
of equality and courtesy.^ ^^ The Kingdom of God is to
be world-wide.^^^ Race hatred finds no place with a Jew
who makes a Samaritan the hero of one of his stories. -^^^
Caste is equally foreign to his teaching and practice. ^^^
The most menial task may be made a sacrament. ^^^ Hu-
man brotherhood transcends the bonds of blood.^^^
Through sacrifice for humanity, one is initiated into a
freemasonry of brotherhood, with its own privileges and
compensations. "There is no man who has left house, or
brothers, or sisters, or mother, or father, or children, or
lands, for the sake of the great cause, but will receive a
hundredfold, even now in the present life — houses, and
brothers, and sisters, and mothers, and children, and
^"Lu. 16:10-12.
»«Lu. 12:47-48.
*«Lu. 16:1-9. Cf. ministry of beauty, Matt. 26:6-13.
*«Lu. 12:16-21; 16:19-31.
»«Lu. 14:12-14; Matt. 5:46-47.
*«Matt. 23:8-11.
"'Mk. 10:42-45; Lu. 7:28.
*«Matt. 5:3; 18:1-4.
^••Matt. 23:12; Mk. 9:35; 10:31; Lu. 14:7-11.
"»Jn. 4:27; 19:26-27; Lu. 10:38-42.
"*Lu. 13:29; Matt. 28:19; Jn. 12:32.
«»Lu. 10:33. Cf. Jn. 4:9; Matt. 8:5-13.
-Matt. 9:10-11; Lu. 19:5-7; 14:12-14.
"•Jn. 13:1-15.
"•Mk. 3:31-35. Cf. Matt. 10:37.
PKELIMINARY: JESUS' VIEWi OF UNIVEESE 15
lands." ^^® "Happy are the gentle-men, for they will in-
herit the earth." ^^^ That is, God's world eventually will
come into possession, not of the bully but of the courteous
man, who, with all his ability to see opportunities and his
shrewdness in grasping them,^^^ is considerate of others'
rights and interested in others' welfare. The unsocial
man is excluded from God's family as abnormal ; in fact
he excludes himself. -^^^ The same doom is pronounced
on the unsocial nation. ^^® Service is the inexorable test,
which spells destruction to those who fail to meet it.^*^
Here is a theory of human relations that is simple, com-
prehensive, self -consistent, and eminently practical. Has
Jesus given a correct solution of the riddle of the Uni-
verse? Does his interpretation square with the world as
we know? Will the theory work? That is the question
before us. I propose to use Christianity as a working
hypothesis.
^'"Mk. 10:28-30. Cf. Rom. 16:13, "his mother and mine."
"'Matt. 5:5.
"•Matt! 25:14-30; Lu. 19:12-26.
"•Matt. 22:11-13; 18:17; 25:30, 46.
"*'Matt. 21:33-43; Lu. 13:29-30.
^Lu. 20:9-18; Matt. 7:24-27.
PART I
THE EXTEENAL UNIVERSE
PAET I.
THE EXTEENAL UOTVERSE.
II.
THE PASSING OF PHYSICAL MATEEIAIilSM.
Jesus' spiritualistic philosophy meets its first test as it
faces the problem of the external world. Modern Astrono-
my has immensely expanded the physical Universe in
which man's life is spent. Our great solar system, with
its planets in orderly rotation and revolution, is but the
vestibule. A billion other suns are distributed through a
space so vast that we reckon distance not by miles but by
light years. The light from the more distant stars re-
quires more than 200,000 years to reach us. Telescope
and spectroscope reveal the cyclic changes through which
these stars are passing, and have been passing for we know
not how many million years.
Of this newly discovered world of Astronomy, I shall
speak more at length in a later chapter. Suffice it to note
here that the physical Universe is one inter-related whole.
Suns and satellites, clusters and spirals, nebulae and star
dust, are embraced in a single system. Everywhere we
find the same forces of gravity and radiation pressure.
The rays of heat shot out from one unit, in time reach
and act upon the other units. The same chemical elements
found on our earth have been detected in the stars. Solids
and gases everywhere follow the same laws of behavior.
What is the nature of this physical Universe, this vast
Mechanism with which man is so closely connected ? Jesus
19
20 CHAOS OR COSMOS?
claimed that it is spiritual, dynamic, the vesture and mani-
festation of the living and ever present God. Opposed
to this is the philosophy of Materialism, which grew up
out of the advance in physical Science. Matter itself is
the ultimate reality. The Universe is merely an infinite
congeries of atoms, unchanging in quantity, constantly
entering on new arrangements within a semi-material
Space or ^ther, under stress of an Energy which is re-
distributed but never altered.
As thus stated, the two theories are mutually contradic-
tory. But it is possible to bring them onto a common
plane. A pure atomism is not held today by any leading
scientific thinker. The uniformity of ^Nature, the causal
nexus between all phenomena, the laws of conservation —
have compelled us to regard the world as a unity. Jesus
likewise thinks of the world as a whole. Throughout it
reveals the activity and expresses the character of God.
Thus Christianity and Science speak of the same
"Universe," although in different terms. The question
at issue is this: is Matter material, or is it essentially
active, or dynamic ?
Except for the strain on the imagination, the philosophi-
cal problem before us is not affected by the great extension
in space and time. The study which will give us the
nature of Matter must be intensive. To understand the
ultimate structure of a grain of sand or a cubic inch of
air, the forces at work and their interaction, is to know
the physical Universe in its totality.
The most important event in recent Thought is the
passing of Materialism, as a philosophy based on scien-
tific induction. The age-long problem of Matter has been
attacked, and in a measure solved. Modem Physics has
taken a position which is entirely consistent with Jesus'
theory of a spiritual Universe.^
*A more detailed study of the new Physics will be found in my
Unfolding Universe, 1915, chaps. 3 to 5. The best introduction for
the general reader is R. A. Millikan, The Electron, 1917, with full
PASSING OF PHYSICAL MATERIALISM 21
Materialism was done to death, not by the cloistered
student, spinning a web of idealism from his own brain;
not by the militant theologian, turning his blind eye to
the facts of Science, that he might fight on ignorant and
undaunted. The materialistic doctrine, so often put forth
in the name of Science, was destroyed through the further
study of the scientists themselves.
Sir William Crookes began it, in 1870. He had been
studying the new cathode rays, formed by passing elec-
tricity through a vacuum tube. He made the discovery
that the rays consist of minute particles, carrying a nega-
tive electric charge. Twenty years later these particles, or
electrons, were studied more closely by Professor J. J.
Thomson of Cambridge, and others. A series of experi-
ments, as brilliant as any in the history of Science, yielded
the discoveries which are revolutionizing both Physics and
Philosophy. We learned that electrons are the units of
the electric current. All flow of electricity, from the flash
of lightning to the power generated by turbines and passed
through the filament of our electric lamp, is a stream of
these tiny particles. We learned further that the solid
atom, hitherto the unit of Matter, is composed of elec-
trons, and of particles bearing an equivalent positive
charge. The units of Electricity are the units of matter :
the basis of the air we breathe, of the floor we walk on, of
our flesh and bone and blood and brain.
Just before the close of the century came the discovery
of radium, and of other radioactive substances. Here a
references. See also J. S. Ames, Constitution of Matter, 1913;
Comstock and Troland, Nature of Matter and Electricity, 1919;
Norman R. Campbell, Modern Electrical Theory, 2nd ed., 1913;
H. A. Lorentz, Theory of Electrons, 1909; O. W. Richardson,
Electron Theory of Matter, 1914. For the earlier Relativity theory,
R. C. Tolman, Theory of the Relativ. of Motion, 1917. For the
generalized theory, the excellent popular summary by Albert Ein-
stein himself, Eng. trans, by R. W. Lawson, 1920; J. Malcolm
Bird, etc., Einstein's Theories of Relativ. and Gravitation, Scientific
American, 1921; and A. S. Eddington, Relativ. Theory of Oravitor
tion, London Physical Society, 1918. (I prefer this to his Space,
Time and Gravitation, 1920.)
22 CHAOS OR COSMOS?
complex atom is in process of breaking down. As it does
so, it shoots forth electrons at enormous velocities. Kauf-
mann and Biicherer gave Materialism its mortal wound
when they proved that the swiftly moving electron has a
larger mass than the electron which is moving with com-
parative slowness, as in the cathode ray. That is, part of
its mass is not material at all. The inertia of the electron,
the apparent solidity of this minute physical body which
lies at the basis of all physical bodies, is largely due to its
motion, or to the opposing forces set up by its motion.
Later researches have indicated that all the mass of the
electron is electrical in origin. Physicists find that the
connection between mass and velocity is what would be
expected, if the entire mass is due to the electric charge.
To lose its energy would be to lose its mass. The electron
is not a solid particle, as was at first supposed, but a point
or region where a definite electric charge is concentrated.
The same is probably true of the corresponding unit of
positive electricity, very much larger in size, but by no
means as well known.. To consider the positive units as
other than electrical, is to introduce what Lorentz calls
an unnecessary dualism. The working hypothesis of
present-day Physics is that "matter is of an electrical
nature, and the forces of cohesion between the particles,
which give a solid its rigidity, are electrical forces." ^
As another writer puts it, all the properties of matter may
be explained as the "statistical result of the behavior of
the individual electrons.'' ^ Much work remains to be
done in tracing these relations and behavior. The absorb-
ing problem of theoretical Physics is that of the arrange-
ment of electrons within the atom, and its connection with
the radiation of light. But the entire viewpoint has
changed. The physical world is not composed, as we used
to think, of solid atoms, little pellets of stuff, moving about
in groups in an elastic medium known as the -^ther. It
*A. S. Eddington, Nature, 101, p. 15, 1918.
■R. C. Tolman, Relativity of Motion, 1917, 15.
PASSING OF PHYSICAL MATERIALISM 23
is now thought of as made up of centers of electric force,
positive and negative, acting upon each other, and keeping
one another in incessant motion.
To one accustomed to thinking in terms of an atomic
theory, the electrical view of Matter comes as a relief and
not as a burden. The dead stuff of a purely physical
universe, however Idealism might seek to ignore it, was
something of which neither Idealism nor Materialism
could give a satisfactory explanation. It remained an
irreducible surd in any equation of reality. The New
Physics gives us a dynamic Universe. Electron units are
active and not merely passive. If any one doubts whether
they are active, let him touch a wire along which a stream
of them is passing. And a Universe made up of such
"live" units is, to some degree at least, self-sufficient and
self-explanatory.
Then came the doctrine of Kelativity to give Material-
ism the stroke of mercy. We must give up even the idea
of a fixed medium for physical units. There is good
reason for believing that the earth is moving around the
sun at a rate of about 20 miles a second. Kepeated at-
tempts have been made to detect this motion, with refer-
ence to a surrounding ^ther, but absolutely without re-
sult. Einstein therefore rejected the idea of any fixed
frame of reference. The only motion which can be de-
tected is motion of one body relative to another. No such
thing as absolute motion is known to us. If an observer
and the body whose velocity he is trying to measure are
moving uniformly, each has its own space and time.
There is no way of directly comparing one system of space
and time with another. All we can do is to make a mathe-
matical transformation of two sets of space-time coordi-
nates. If there are some of my readers who have not even
a bowing acquaintance with coordinates, I would state
that they are ^e imaginary linesmen stationed along the
field to mark the position of the ball on successive downs.
Where we have two balls, we must have two sets of lines-
24 CHAOS OE COSMOS?
men. By the use of this system it is possible for the
mathematical sportsman to follow the games which are
being played all over the country. The laws of E'ature,
which are given us by our study of Mechanics and Dy-
namics, may be stated independently of the observer's
particular scheme of space and time.
Kecently Einstein has generalized his principle to cover
all types of motion. The deflection caused by a field of
force, for example gravitation, means the introduction of
a new space and time for the deflected body. The deflec-
tion is represented by another series of space-time coordi-
nates, similar to that introduced for uniform motion. We
follow the game, as before, through the reports of imagi-
nary linesmen, and it appears to be played in the same
way. A man falling from a roof would, during his de-
scent, be constructing a new series of space-times, and
might not know he had been falling, except for the forces
of cohesion in the material which stopped his motion.
Einstein's principle was suggested by a case of this sort
which came under .his observation.
The new theory was able to explain the puzzling dis-
crepancy in the advance of Mercury's orbit. A second
crucial test was the prediction that the light from the
stars, when passing near the sun, would receive a certain
amount of deflection through the sun's gravitational attrac-
tion. This was brilliantly confirmed by the eclipse expedi-
tions of 1919.
Momentous consequences follow from this doctrine of
Eelativity. That bulwark of Thought, the Newtonian
Mechanics, with its assumptions of a fixed and unvarying
space, time, mass, etc., is being thrown overboard piece by
piece. Mass is equivalent to energy, and increases with
velocity. "Space and time in themselves," as Minkowski
said, "vanish to shadows, and only a kind of union of the
two preserves an independent existence." The ^ther
itself, the hypothetical medium for the action of forces, is
discarded as being merely a scientific fiction, which ere-
PASSING OF PHYSICAL MATERIALISM 25
ates more difficulties than it explains. Or else we rele-
gate it to be the mythical abode of Lodge's disembodied
spirits. We are no longer troubled about action across
empty space, because we have ceased to talk about a space
"in which" things move.
As a picture of reality, the Geometry of Euclid must
go the way of the Newtonian Mechanics. Even while you
are representing your objects as cubes and polyhedrons
and spheres, the electrons which compose the world have
taken a thousand other arrangements. There is no me-
dium to retain the form of any of them. We are obliged
to construct space by means of moving points and lines,
instead of cutting up a space already made. As Sommer-
ville puts it, space and matter are inextricably entangled.
It is necessary to "build up a monistic theory of the physi-
cal world in terms of a single set of entities, material
points, conceived as altering their relations with time." *
Trained as we have been in the old way of thinking, it
is not easy to adjust our thought to a physical universe,
whose component parts are constantly changing their rela-
tions, and with no material substratum whatever. Our
minds grow dizzy. We long for the old world of reality,
which appeared to stand still whenever we wanted to ob-
serve it. But an adjustment to the "moving continuity"
of the new conception is by no means impossible. Our
thought soon grows accustomed to the unceasing move-
ment. We come to regard reality as a flow, however it
may be necessary for the intellect, as Bergson says, to
arrest this flow, and represent it as a series of fixed states,
like the separate pictures of a cinematograph film.
When the modern Kip van Winkle, after a long sleep,
returns to the study of Physics, he finds himself in a new
world. That world is no longer "material." Pellets of
stuff, aether medium, fluid space, alike have vanished.
The fundamental fact is these electric charges, with their
*D. M. Y. Sommerville, El&ment» of Non-Euolidean Geom., 1914,
201.
26 CHAOS OR COSMOS?
properties, their motions, their interactions, their rela-
tions and sequences. A mechanical arrangement of pas-
sive units has given place to a dynamic Universe. Matter
has not disappeared; it cannot be ignored. But it is
being stated in terms of Force or Energy.^
This revolution of thought tends to close the gap be-
tween Physics and Biology. The organic loses its excep-
tional character. The appearance of life on this planet
ceases to demand a special creative fiat. More and more
the phenomena of Life are being stated in terms of chem-
istry. We are able to modify organic processes by chang-
ing the surrounding medium. Biologists confidently ex-
pect to produce in the laboratory some of the syntheses of
physical particles on which the life of the cell depends.
What does all this mean ? That Materialism has won the
day? Some such fear has haunted many a Christian
man in our generation. But physical particles themselves
are no longer "material." They are centers of electrical
concentration, parts of that unity of interacting centers
which we know as the Universe. The mechanist, work-
ing forward from the new arrangement of atoms which
is characteristic of the organism, and the vitalist, working
backward from the behavior of living creatures, find a
possible meeting ground in this conception of a world of
forces and force-centers, which forms the common basis of
Matter and Life. It is not difficult to conceive of an elec-
trical atom and a living cell as belonging to the same
family. A new grouping of forces may be expected to
show new properties, as, to quote an analogy from T. H.
Morgan, the properties of sugar differ entirely from the
sum of the properties of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen.
■What Force is in itself, as represented by the deflections asso-
ciated with an electric charge, is still a matter of debate in the
scientific world. To Eddington, for example, both matter and energy
are the expression of world curvature. They are part of our per-
ception that such curvature exists. {Space, Time and Gravitation,
1920, 92.) Rather than enter on this doubtful region of meta-
physics, I prefer to leave "force" and "dynamic universe" as unde-
fined terms given us by our observation of the world.
PASSING OF PHYSICAL MATEEIALISM 27
The same is true of that higher, more specialized form
of life which we call Mind. The human mind uses an
elaborate machinery of brain and nerve cells, which itself
has helped to organize, and on which its activities depend
to a large degree. Mental states are closely correlated
with cerebral states. Damage to the brain affects the
mind. The destruction of certain centers in the left brain
of a right-handed person, means the loss of word-hearing,
or of word-seeing, or of word-speaking. But this does not
mean that the mind is material, or dependent on what is
material. There is no longer any such thing as the ma-
terial, in the old sense. The phenomena all come within
the field of energetics. The Universe appears to us not
only in the comparatively simple groupings of electrons
which we find in inorganic chemistry, but in the elaborate
molecules which go to make up living cells. These cells
in turn, when grouped as organisms, and specialized in
brain and nerve cells, reveal properties and powers in the
Universe, of which the student of the inorganic world
knows nothing. Of necessity the physiologist will empha-
size the processes of the brain. The psychologist concen-
trates his attention on its properties. But the electron
and the albumin molecule, the living cell and the human
mind, the neurones of the cerebral hemispheres and the
scientist who directs or inhibits them, all fijid their place
in a dynamic Universe.
Still another gulf has been bridged, between Science
and Keligion. A physical Universe of this character,
linked as it is with organisms and brain cells, fits into the
Christian interpretation of the world. The idea of God
will need to be reformulated. But recent Physics and
Jesus' conception of God's activity in I^Tature constitute a
mutual approach. They meet in a new and comprehensive
unity, which calls for another chapter.
IIL
GOD RESTATED.
The passing of physical materialism hreaks the spell of
Divine aloofness which Augustine and Aquinas laid upon
Christian thought. The Middle Ages passed on to modem
Europe a dualism quite similar to that of the Pharisees
— God and His creation, Heaven and Earth, Spirit and
Matter. Of the two parts of this inheritance, it was the
material world which Europe was beginning to study by
the new inductive method. One discovery followed an-
other. Growing knowledge brought an increasing mastery
of the world. Surplus human energies were engrossed by
scientific research, by manufacturing and trade. Religion
suffered in consequence. With the decay of religious faith
during the 18th and early 19th centuries, there came into
vogue the materialistic philosophy of the Universe to
which I referred in the last chapter. The spiritual realm
appeared so remote that men readily listened to the sug-
gestion that it was unreal. The effect was far reaching.
Two of the most powerful influences of modern times took
shape in this era. Science developed a materialistic tra-
dition, which was intensified by its conflict with current
Theology. Socialism was given its classic expression by
leaders who were under the spell of the same anti-clerical
and materialistic movement.^
Jesus' idea of God's direct and universal activity had
been practically forgotten. As long as men conceived of
*See Andrew D. White, Hist, of the Warfare of Science with
Theology, 1903; W. Rauschenbusch, Christianizing the Social Order,
1912, 110. However idealistic the modern Socialist may be, he is
likely to be a materialist in the type of his thought.
28
GOD RESTATED 29
the world as material, it was necessary to distinguish
sharply between God and the world. The two could not
be considered akin. The relation in which they stood was
that of Creator and creation. And here Christian think-
ing faced a dilemma. Either God made Matter out of
nothing, a feat which it was almost impossible for the
human mind to grasp. Or Matter had always existed, a
position that appeared to limit God. The Hebrew tradi-
tion, as embodied in the first chapter of Genesis, seems
to imply some permanent raw material which God worked
np in the course of creation. A third alternative was to
Inake Matter an idea or an illusion, which the practical
Western mind could not accept.
Scientific philosophy, as we have seen, concentrated its
attention on Matter, ignoring or denying a Creator. Re-
ligion, on what were for the most part valid grounds, con-
tinued to develop its doctrine of God. The result was
a Tower of Babel. These two branches of human thought
came to speak different languages. J^either could under-
stand what the other was trying to describe. The Chris-
tian charged the scientific man with denying God. The
latter regarded the Christian as an obscurantist, on whom
the accumulated knowledge of Science made no impression.
The effect of this dualism on Religion was equally
unfortunate. The material world, with which men have
so much to do, was constantly encroaching on the Divine.
Every youthful religion has thought of its god as present
and active in the world. As the religion grows older, the
divinity becomes less immanent and more transcendent.
The god who once took a hand in all the affairs of ^Nature
and of the community life, now intervenes only in special
crises. Once God's activity in the world was direct and
personal; now he works only through second causes or
through angels. Once he lived in the tree and the spring ;
he walked in the garden in the cool of the day. 'Now he
dwells in a distant heaven, august, inaccessible. Once he
was the intimate of man, his friend and ally, his guest at
30 CHAOS OR COSMOS?
the sacrificial feast. Now lie sits on his throne, sur-
rounded by courtiers and menials, receiving as of right
the flattery and adoration of his earthly subjects.
To the average worshipper, at the beginning of the 20th
century, the world was real but God was unreal. God's
world had pushed God so far away that He appeared to
have little to do with our everyday life, ^o figure is
more pathetic than that of the sincere Christian of the
dualist school, opening his daily newspaper with the lurk-
ing fear that God has been disproved.
The situation was indeed alarming. Students of So-
ciety are beginning to recognize the importance of Re-
ligion as a factor in human development. I can only
indicate, in the briefest way, its biological significance.
In the- earliest cultural stages known to us, we find men
seeking to know and ada|>t themselves to their Environ-
ment. And this adjustment is largely mental. It takes
place in the region of ideas, emotions, values, attitudes.
The savage tries to escape from the evil powers which he
conceives to be back of the objects and activities of the
world around him, and to bind to himself the powers he
thinks of as beneficent. Crude as the process seems to
us, it was biologically sound and of very great practical
utility. We owe to it the beginnings of agriculture, ani-
mal husbandry and tEe arts. Human life took on dignity
and meaning. Adolescence and reproduction assumed a
mystical importance. Religious sanctions were the foun-
dation of morality, and made possible the solidarity of
the clan or tribe. However much the ideas and forms of
Religion have changed in the course of centuries, re-
ligious faith retains its essential character. Men still seek
to adjust themselves to the Universe, by value-judgments
and the establishing of personal contacts. We have noted
the tendency in the modem era to separate science and
the arts from their original dependence on religion. The
verdict of History is that this separation cannot safely
be carried beyond a certain point. As we face the ac-
GOD EESTATED 31
tivities of the external world, and whatever lies behind
them, the attitude of confidence and cooperation has a
survival value for the individual or for the social group.
Without it, human associations are in the long run un-
workable. Religious decadence and general scepticism
are a mark of social decay. They might be termed a
biological retrogression. Man is less fitted to work with
his Environment.
The new position taken by physical Science opens the
way for a realinement of Christian doctrine. If Matter
is dynamic rather than material, it is no longer necessary
to say that God is outside of the world which He has
made. Such a distinction has lost its value. The world
may better be described as the unfolding of God's activity.
Creation must be stated in terms of evolution rather than
of manufacture. God, instead of being a supreme and
perhaps unknowable epiphenomenon, a fifth wheel to the
world's onrushing car, becomes known to us in and through
our Environment. The way is open for us to recover
Jesus' sense of a dynamic, a spiritual world. There is no
other. ISTot Matter but Energy is at the basis of the
Universa It is the materialist's world of inert stuff, of
dead atoms, of fluid space, which proves to be unreal.
When the physicist studies the Universe, he is studying
God, in certain modes of His action. God Himself, and
not one of His creatures or emanations. The theologian
is talking about the same great fact. He is trying to de-
scribe a spiritual Universe. By the use of other lines of
evidence, other contacts and judgments of value, the
Christian interprets God as the Divine Parent, whose
spiritual order is revealed to our experience through Jesus
Christ. Science tells us the way God does His work.
Christianity explains the character of the Universe and
enables us to make our adjustment more intelligent and
fruitful.
Science and Religion are thus two sides of the same
process of mental adaptation. Each is supreme in its own
33 CHAOS OE COSMOS?
field. The function of Science is to describe; the func-
tion of Eeligion is to interpret. The scientist must be
absolutely free to study the facts of the Universe and
report his findings. 'No one else is competent to do so.
In its own sphere, Religion must be given the same right
of way. For the scientific worker to say that there is no
God back of the phenomena of the Universe, would be as
presumptuous as for the theologian to deny the atomic
theory or the fact of organic evolution. Science may de-
scribe the facts of the world, but it cannot interpret the
world as a whole. I speak positively on this matter, be-
cause for many years I was engaged in what I believe was
an honest and competent attempt to interpret the world
on the basis of scientific induction. I found that after a
certain stage in the enquiry I reached the end of my
rope. Induction failed because the data were incomplete.
By no conceivable perfecting of scientific method can the
situation be remedied. In order to make further advance
I was obliged to turn to religion in general, and in particu-
lar to the climax of religious development which we reach
in the experience of Jesus. He interprets the Universe
as expressing the activity of a moral and altruistic God.
Our concern is with the value of this idea, rather than
with any particular theories as to its source. Philosophi-
cally it must be counted as a hypothesis, but no other hypo-
thesis is at hand. Either Jesus has given a correct inter-
pretation of the Universe, a problem to which the present
book is devoted. Or no interpretation is possible; the
Universe is a Chaos, without intelligible meaning. To
return to my original point, the distinction between the
scientific and the religious attitude and method is merely
for practical convenience. ITormally the same mind will
hold both attitudes and follow both methods. It is only
by combining the two that we gain a complete picture of
the Universe.
The mystic sees God, where other people see only soil
and flesh and implements and wood and steel. The differ-
GOD RESTATED 33
ence is partly in temperament, partly in the power of
imagination, partly in training and intellectual environ-
ment. But God is there, in all tiie physical world, what-
ever names we give to it. The most matter of fact person
is as truly in contact with Him as is the religious mystic
or the dreaming poet, of whom our next chapter will have
much to tell. Once let the practical man catch that point
of view, the point of view of Jesus, and a righteous and
loving God begins to be for him a supreme reality, and no
longer merely a name or a tradition.
The revolution of thought which I have sketched may
mean the beginning of a new Christian era. Faith and
worship become once more an integral part of life. The
religion of Christ, with which our modem civilization
is identified, should have in the future a note of reality,
a this-worldliness, a practical mysticism, which it has not
known since Jesus taught in Palestine. Can God seem
distant or unreal when the very food we eat, the clothes
we wear, the body that is clothed and fed, are essentially
Divine? The physical, as Dearmer says, becomes a sac-
rament, the outward and visible sign of a spiritual Pres-
ence. Each day is sacred that is lived with Him. Each
spot is holy where we meet our God. All functioning
of body and brain becomes an act of communion. The
natural world takes on new beauty and meaning. Every
human activity finds a place in the spiritual order which
God and men are making a reality on earth.
Yesterday God to the average man was an abstraction.
Christian theologians, not yet emancipated from Greek
and German philosophy, tended to treat Him as an idea, an
Absolute, a bundle of ideal qualities which it was often
difficult to translate into the concrete.
Today, if we accept Jesus' spiritual interpretation of
the world, God is a fact, the great fact of existence, the
one thing real in the external world from which there
is no escape. In His constant and ordered activity we
Jive and move and have our being. Keligion is no longer a
34 CHAOS OE COSMOS?
matter of choice. In the broad sense, every man is re-
ligious. The atheist and the Christian, the artisan and the
astronomer, the physicist and the priest, alike are in con-
tact with that ever-present, unavoidable Universe, which
the Christian, through his deeper experience, has learned
to call the presence of the Father. I do not attempt to
state the exact relations between God and the physical
Environment. But the two are so close, in our experience,
that to ask proof of the existence of God would be to
prove the existence of the Universe, which only an occa-
sional bedouin philosopher considers necessary.
It is evident that our idea of communion between man
and God must be given a broader meaning. Intercourse
with a Deity who lives up in the sky, is one thing. Inter-
course with a God who fills all the world that our senses
reveal to us, is quite another thing. In the next chapter,
let us consider man's communion with God in !N'ature.
IV.
Jesus' sense of God's activity in !N"ature was buried for
many centuries. Christian thought was pitched in an-
other key. Its joy was found in anticipations of a future
heaven, rather than in appreciation of the present earth.
The world was essentially evil ; the Day of Judgment was
at hand. Christians, writhing under persecution, found
comfort in the Jewish imagery of the last things. Then
apocalypse gave place to asceticism. The ideal Christian
life, possible only for the few, was to withdraw from the
world and its pleasures, and mortify the flesh for the sake
of the soul. In the break-up of civilization during the
following centuries, men had no spirit for the enjoyment
of JsTature. Augustine's dream is of a city, and that not
of this earth. The Greek love and worship of beauty dies
out ; the passion for country life, the delight in landscape
for its own sake, which we see in Horace and Vergil. Al-
most the last echoes of nature-love are found in some
charming bits in the Elocutio Novella, and in the descrip-
tion of the Moselle by the Christian teacher Ausonius,
toward the end of the fourth century. Teutonic thought
was cast in a gloomier mold. Land clearing meant a hard
and unceasing struggle with natural forces. The forest,
which fills such a large place in mediaeval folk-lore, was
peopled not by nymphs but by pixies and goblins. Wild
nature was not loving but terrible.
The recovery of E'ature was not due to the churchmen,
whose thoughts were elsewhere, but to the poets. Wan-
dering students trill very pagan songs. At the end of the
35
36 CHAOS OE COSMOS?
12th century, Walther von der Vogelweide sings in castle
courts of "the flowers pressing out of the grass, early on a
May morning, and smiling at the playful sun." A hun-
dred years later, Dante has the gift and the leisure of mind
to observe the natural world and enjoy it and describe it.
Dafydd in Wales paints his lyric pictures of the birds.
Petrarch finds in his mountain retreat at Vaucluse, and in
his study of antiquity, something of that world of natural
beauty which men once knew and were to know again.
Chaucer says farewell to his books and his prayers, when
Spring comes and he hears the birds singing.
The Kenaissance revived the feeling of the Greek and
Latin writers toward the natural world, which once more
became something it was legitimate to study and enjoy.
The movement represented a new energy and broadening
sympathies. But it tended, like any revival of the old,
toward artificiality. The love of N'ature was an affair of
fountains and trim garden walks, of classical imagery and
courtly sentiment. Only in England did it become freshly
creative. The lyrics of the Elizabethans are spontaneous,
overflowing, sometimes even boisterous in their enjoy-
ment. The landscape backgrounds of Shakespeare, the
more elaborate descriptions of Milton, are equal to the
best in classic literature, and with a human feeling which
is their own. In England too a cold and symmetrical man-
nerism succeeded, for nearly two centuries. But the love
of country life, once gained, was never lost, as Palgrave
has shown in his quotations from minor poets. ^
In their treatment of !N"ature, the painters fared in some
ways better than the poets. Theirs was a new art, and not
a revival. "No classic models survived to hamper freedom
of expression. Popular taste continued to demand con-
ventional figure painting, even in the treatment of natural
scenery. But long before the rise of Komanticism, Titian
and Diirer had begun to turn space backgrounds into true
* F. T. Palgrave, Landscape in Poetry, 167 //.
MAFS COMMUNION WITH NATURE 37
landscape. Salvator Rosa caught the appeal of the roman-
tic and sublime. Claude studied Nature so closely that he
was able to generalize its impressions of atmosphere and
sunlight. And generations of gifted Hollanders, in their
rendering of ocean, sky and land, whether with bold nat-
uralism or the poetic interpretation of wide spaces, de-
veloped a knowledge and appreciation of natural beauty
which in a later age would find ample recognition.
It is not until Rousseau that Europe really comes to love
wild Nature. Men break away from the artificial and
conventional. The romantic spirit invests every natural
object with charm and human meaning. This feeling has
become so instinctive with us moderns, that it is hard to
think our way back to the days, only a century and a half
ago, when men did not pass through the Alps except from
necessity, when a geometrical garden was preferred to a
wooded hillside, and to go from city to country was apt to
be considered a form of exile or penance.
God's natural world is a Temple with various courts.
To enter the outer precincts, one need not name the name
of God. No set forms of worship are prescribed, no offer-
ing, no temple fee. An artist's eyes are good. But the
only requisites are a mind at leisure and a receptive soul.
Let a man put aside for a while his work and cares, and
step into the freshness and beauty out of doors. At once
he finds himself on holy ground. The pure air fills his
lungs, tense nerves relax, a new peace steals upon his spirit.
His senses are alert to the beauty and melody around
him.
The comfortable warmth of the sun in the early spring-
time, and the smell of moist earth. The brownish green of
the prairie grass, with a background of red stems in the
windbreak of willows. The first shy anemones, and the
glory of marsh marigolds by the brookside. Wild plums
and cherries with their splashes of white, set off against
38 CHAOS OE COSMOS?
that new green world which the gooseberries had been fore-
telling. A whiff of wild-grape blossoms. The apple trees
in their bridal beauty.
The aromatic fragrance of the sweet-fern, basking in the
summer sun. The mountain stream where trout are hid-
ing, and one takes toll besides of every mossy rock and
silver brown ripple, of the sunlight through translucent
young birches, and the cool damp shadows. Strawberries
hanging over the brook at the edge of the meadow, where
the queenly elm keeps solitary state. The lake at evening,
as you glide out with your canoe and witness the marriage
of sky and shore.
The first sharp frost of Autumn, decking sumac and
swamp maple in brave scarlet coats. Poplars minting their
golden coins. The riotous colors of the sugar-bush in
northern !N'ew England. The Turkish tapestry of the
Connecticut hills.
Bare branches, dividing the sky into traceries of forgot-
ten beauty. The sparkle of fresh snow, and the ozone in
one's lungs. And Spring will begin a new cycle of
rhythmic loveliness. "How good is man's life, the mere
living." If appreciation of God's world be worship, every
red-blooded devotee is the better for communion.
But nature worship is an instinct, universal, irrepres-
sible. If we may not visit mountains and woods and
streams, we can hang on cur wall the interpretation which
some artist has given of them, or the camera's reminders.
No home so poor but it may set up an altar in the shape
of a potted plant, a slip to which the housewife brings her
daily offering of water and love, a bulb that shows to won-
dering young eyes the miracle of resurrection. 'No slum
but has its flower vender, who finds eager purchasers. To
my thinking a single rose, bought with one's last coin, is
lovelier far than a plutocratic sheaf of blossoms. Even
when the flower fades, the leaves and angled stem live on
as objects of exquisite beauty. Every civilized city must
have its parks, for the great multitude who cannot go
MAN'S COMMUNION WITH NATURE 39
afield. We feel it a sacred duty to God and to humaiiity
to reproduce as best we may the trees and flowers of His
natural world, and the green grass where tired eyes may
rest and children play.
From this outer precinct of the Temple, some of us
pass in to the court of Imagination. I confess that I sel-
dom enter this sacred area, except when some poet or
painter leads ma It is not that my powers of imagining
are deficient. It is not that I see the machinery of nat-
ural processes, for of these I know comparatively little.
But my senses are so keen, my enjoyment of form and
color so satisfying, I am so engrossed by N"ature's un-
spoken friendliness, that I am not apt at drawing lessons
or tracing spiritual meanings. I never should have made a
good Greek, to people the natural world with nymphs and
goddesses. I do not find in it suggestions for an old age
vision of death, like the youthful Bryant And yet I enjoy
it when my friends make Nature a setting for things
human.
A favorite painting by Sontag represents a wild
forest scene. In the foreground is a log cabin, with the
blue smoke curling upward. Now when I go to worship
out of doors, unless I have some creature needs which man
alone can supply, I prefer to take my forest straight. I
object to intruders, to vulgar tourists, to farmers slashing
into my favorite woods. But I am glad the painter put
in the log cabin. Under the spell of his art, I can enter
again into the hardships and satisfactions of the home-
steader's life, as he hews a farm of his own out of the
timber. In a certain picture of the Maine coast, the last
rays of the sun touch the top of the cliffs, the masses of
cloud, the distant island, the hollows of the ocean swell.
But it is good that the artist adds some ships, to catch
the golden light on their sails. And the two women on
the rocks, in the costume of 1850, give a touch of fellow-
ship to our common worship. The Angelus, without the
tired reverent figures and the distant church tower, Vould
40 CHAOS OR COSMOS?
be merely a study of the sunset afterglow in chrome yellow.
By putting man into his landscape, the artist helps us to
feel that God's world of l^ature, like the Sabbath, was
made for man.
But there is a Divine symbolism in the outward world
which even the most sense-bound of nature worshippers
may share, when a Jesus or some other poet-teacher leads
the way. To pick a lily, and think that it is God who
clothed it in its glorious colors. To ride along a forest
road in October and feel that He has passed by, touching
the foliage lightly with His frost brush.
All over upland and lowland
The charm of the golden rod, —
Some of us call it Autumn
And others call it God.
Or take the sunrise, as pictured in various ages. For
the singer of the Rig Veda, "she comes like a fair young
maiden, awakening all to labor, with a hundred chariots
comes she," or driving before her the red cattle of the
clouds. In Homer too she is the rosy-fingered goddess,
rising from her ocean couch, and yoking to her car the
swift horses that carry light to men. With the Hebrew
psalmist, Jehovah hac pitched a tent of many colors for
the sun, which is like a bridegroom coming out of his
chamber, and rejoices as an athlete to run his race. Or
Jehovah covereth Himself with light as with a garment;
He maketh the clouds His chariot, and walketh upon the
wings of the wind. In Christian poetry, when freed from
the trammels of classical convention, the symbolism
changes:
Out of the scabbard of the night.
By God's hand drawn,
Flashes the shining sword of light,
And lo ! the Dawn.
MAWS COMMUNION WITH NATURE 41
The inner court, the Holj of Holies, ushers us into the
Presence. It is entered, at rare intervals, by the high
priests of humanity, who see the natural world with the
eyes of a mystic. There come moments in the life of man
when "this earth he walks on seems not earth." And the
vision melts into the glow of rapturous assurance. The
literature of Mysticism shows us how religious men, in all
ages, have found communion with NTature a communion
with God.
The God we find in ^Nature will be the God we have
already come to know through instruction and social wor-
ship. But the Presence is there, for the seer, no matter
how unorthodox, to discover and possess. Berenson has
called attention to the mystical value of space-composition
in the Umbrian school of painters, notably Perugino. His
art, while we are under its spell, "woos us away from our
tight, painfully limited selves, dissolves us into the space
presented, until at last we seem to become its permeating,
indwelling spirit." ^
Perugino but reproduces the elemental rapture which
Nature brings at times, especially in far perspectives. A
feeling of awful yet thrilling immensity, a quickened pulse
and breathing, the sense of being in the very presence
of God Himself. In various situations it comes to me.
Not only in a building with lofty arches, a cathedral, or
one of our really great railway stations. But under the
stars on a clear night. Or on stepping forth of a morning
beneath the measureless sky of the West, where the blue
stretches haze-less to the horizon. I have the same sensa-
tion when I come out upon a mountain crest, and look
off on wave after wave of giant peaks.
This overwhelming sense of the Divine in Nature comes
to many through the medium of wide spaces. Some few,
like Whitman, are able to gain from any natural object
the same inward identification with the Universe. Even
as a child, he tells us, he became the things he looked on,
"B. Berenson, Central Italian Painters, 1897, 102.
42 CHAOS OR COSMOS?
and these objects became part of him, whether they were
early lilacs, or "the sow's pink-faint litter," or water plants
waving their graceful flat heads at the bottom of the pond.
The French writer Senancoiirt tells of walking the streets
of Paris on a dark day in early March. He was gloomy,
and walked because he had nothing to do. He passed a
jonquil in full bloom, bearing the first perfume of the year.
In that instant, his cup of happiness overflowed. Unutter-
able harmony, the sense of being in touch with the ideal
world, arose in him complete.
Whether in the rapt contemplation of the mystic, or the
frank enjoyment of natural forms and colors, communion
with the external world is, from our biological standpoint,
a most important side of human experience. Love of
^Nature is a comparatively modern mood. But behind
it lie the wonder and awe which have played such a large
part in the history of Religion. In his emotional life, as
well as in thinking and practical affairs, we find man
seeking to adjust himself to his Environment. The Uni-
verse, which the religious man calls the manifestation of
God, is here. Whatever names we may give to it,, we can-
not escape from its contact. In the words of the Hebrew
psalmist: "Whither shall I go from Thy Spirit? Or
whither shall I flee from Thy presence? If I mount up
into the sky. Thou art there. If I lie down in the under-
world, behold Thou art there. The darkness and the light
are both alike to Thea"
Y.
THE EAETH AHD THE UNIVEESE.
We turn from the murmuring brooks and sunset colors
of this pleasant earth, divinely fair, to consider again the
stellar universe, and the problem which it forces upon our
minds. Jesus' ideas of astronomy were those of his own
time. The sky was God's throne, and the earth His foot-
stool. The Master's theory of the world was geocentric;
there is no reason to suppose that the notion of other pos-
sible worlds ever entered his thought. This earth and the
life of man upon it were the center of God's interest. Here
the spiritual order was to be developed. God's Kingdom
was to come. His will to be done, on earth as in heaven.
It is at this point that the Christian hypothesis meets
its second test. Can it be made to fit the Universe of our
growing knowledge? When Copernicus in 1543 estab-
lished the fact that the earth is one of the planets revolving
about the sun, and that the sun is a component part of the
vast system of fixed stars, it came as a distinct shock to
religious thought. The earth seemed to dwindle in this
larger perspective, and human life to lose its unique sig-
nificance.
What are the general features of this physical Universe
in which our lives are spent ? Nothing is final in Astron-
omy. Cosmic philosophies, built up with great learning
and enthusiasm, have been left behind as mere landmarks
in the progress of Thought. Theory has ebbed and flowed,
as new evidence pointed this way or that. Dr. See pub-
lished one view of stellar evolution in 1896, and quite
another view in 1910. The same tidal approximation
43
44 CHAOS OR COSMOS?
toward the truth may be expected in the coming days. In
this year of our Lord 1921, the general picture given by
astronomers is something like this. I introduce the cor-
rections which seem to be called for by Shapley'S study of
globular clusters.^
Our home is in the Milky Way. And the Galaxy, which
forms a sort of celestial metropolis, is not laid out as a
band around the sky, but as a disk, filled with stars and
gaseous clouds. Its outer diameter is estimated by Shap-
ley at 300,000 light years. To locate our solar system more
exactly, it lies roughly in the plane of the disk, but de-
cidedly off from the center. According to the latest cen-
sus, the galactic metropolis contains approximately a bil-
lion stars, counting only those which are illuminated. They
are separated from each other by an average distance of
about 13 light years, or a little over 76 trillion miles. The
apparent concentration of small stars in a belt across the
heavens, is explained by their distance; we are looking
through a greater depth, that is through the plane of the
disk.
Eddington has shown that the bright stars are fairly uni-
form in mass, in spite of exceptional giants, like the newly
famous Betelgeuse. They appear to be passing through an
ascending and descending series, the color varying as the
temperature rises or falls. The action of gravitation, what-
* A fuller treatment will be found in Appendix B. Recent Progress
in Cosmogony. Any attempt today at an astronomical compendium,
is like trying to lay out a new atlas, with national boundaries
changing from week to week. For general introductions, I refer
the reader to F. K. Moulton, Introd. to Asiron., new ed., 1912;
H. Jacoby, Astronomy, 1913; Adolpho Stahl Lectures in Astron.y
Astron. Soc. of Pacific, 1919. For methods and results of Astro-
physics: G. E. Hale, Study of Stellar Evol, 1908; W. W. Camp-
bell, Stellar Motions, 1913; A. S. Eddington, Stellar Movements and
the Struc. of the Univ., 1914. For cosmogony: T. J. J. See,
Researches on Evol. of Stellar Syst's, vol. 2, 1910, rather dogmatic;
S. Arrhenius, Worlds m the MaJcing, 1908; Destinies of the Starsi,
1918; J. H. Jeans, Problems of Cosmogony and Stellar Dynamics,
1919. For Geology: T. C. Chamberlin, Origin of the Earth, 1916:
F. W. Clarke, Data of Geochemistry, 4th ed., 1920; L. V. Pirrson and
Chas. Schuchert, Text Book of Qeol.f 1915; Lull, etc., Evol. of the
Earth, 1918.
THE EARTH AND THE UNIVERSE 45
ever that is, would tend to draw the stars together in ever-
growing masses. But this is probably balanced by the scat-
tering influences of electrical repulsion, radiation pressure,
and perhaps explosion. Particles of star dust, escaping
from the gaseous stars, form dark nebulous clouds. These
in turn condense to make new heavenly bodies. Some
features of our present Universe point toward an earlier
stage, many hundreds of million years ago, when the
material later made into stars formed an undifferentiated
mass of rarified gas.
When we pass from the metropolis and its suburbs to
the country districts, we find two dominant types of heav-
enly bodies. The spiral nebulae, of which about half a
million have been detected, are apparently moving away
from the Galaxy with great velocity. The condensed
globular clusters of stars — 86 of them according to the
latest count — are moving toward the Milky Way, and come
closest to it on the opposite side.
How are we to regard these extra-galactic or rural
groups? Each globular cluster appears to be a separate
and complete system. Do they represent other universes ?
Shapley considers them rather as appendages of the Milky
Way. They are miniature galaxies, rather than coequals.
The Hercules cluster, for example, has a diameter of only
1100 light years, with a limited number of stars. In a
later paper he attacks the question of the spiral nebulae,
and reaches a similar conclusion. They must be regarded
as genuine nebulae, rather than as collections of stars
which form "island universes." ^
Do these spirals and clusters represent the outlying
portions of our Universe, and suggest its order of magni-
tude ? Or is the Universe infinite in extent, and filled with
an infinite number of stars ? The light which reaches us
from the stars as a whole is limited. On this ground the
majority of astronomers had decided a few years ago in
favor of a finite Universe. The question was reopened,
*Pullid's of Astronom. 8oo. of Pacific, Oct., 1919.
46 CHAOS OK COSMOS?
with the discovery of a certain amount of star dust in
inter-stellar space. This suggested the possibility of a
"fog," as Turner calls it, which cuts oif part of the light.
But Shapley has shown that there is no appreciable ab-
sorption of light in any part of the sky.^ If our tele-
scopes can penetrate to over 200,000 light years, it is hard
to see how any great amount of light can be cut off by fog.
Apparently we are forced back to the conception of a
finite Universe, with definite though vastly extended boun-
daries. This, in connection with the relativity principle,
may require the revision of many of our ideas of ther-
modynamics.*
By way of parenthesis, I may remark that the question
of a finite or an infinite Universe has no bearing on the
Christian hypothesis, except to determine the particular
form which must be assigned to God in His physical mani-
festation. ' Infinity is purely a spatial term. Space, if we
accept Einstein's principle, is not a frame of reference, but
a series of relations. A finite Universe is one whose rela-
tions are capable of measurement An infinite Universe
would be a Universe whose relations extend so far that
we cannot expect to measure them with any instruments
at our command. . Whether God, in His physical manifes-
tation, is measurable or immeasurable, is a question of
fact, which Astronomy alone can settle.
Another equally futile question is whether the history
and arrangement of the Universe gives any indication of
an intelligent plan. Thus far Astronomy has done little
more than draw up working theories which may serve as
guides for further investigation. We do not know what is
the arrangement of units and forces within the stellar
* Ohservatory, Feb., 1919. Lebedew came to the same conclusion
a few years ago, from a study of light waves. Kapteyn's studies
appear to point to the selective absorption of certain rays, the red-
ness of the stars increasing with their distance. Astrophya. «/.,
29, 46, 1909; 30, 284, 1909; 40, 187, 1914.
*This subject is discussed briefly in my Unfolding Universe,
57-60.
THE EAETH AND THE UNIVERSE ^7
Universe, either in the present or the past. The dogmatism
of the 19th century cosmic philosophers would be entirely
out of place. Until astronomers give us this necessary
knowledge, it is premature to discuss the plan of the stellar
world. Personally I doubt whether the question will ever
be in order. The Universe is here, to be accepted and
studied, rather than criticized. Man's reason is a very
inadequate standard. It is of little value to know whether
the actual system is an intelligent arrangement, such as
would be made by the person who asks whether it is intel-
ligent.
Let us pass to a more specific question: the possibility
of life on other worlds. It is quite common to assume that
the earth is not unique in this regard. Dr. See, for
example, speaks of "millions of similar [solar] systems,
with habitable planets, which may now be confidently
inferred to exist in the immensity of space." Arrhenius
makes the same assumption, and on it bases his new theory
of panspermism. Wallace, in his very able book on Mans
Place in the Universe,^ argued against this, on the law of
probability. It will be well to restate Wallace's argument,
with the modifications in detail due to our advancing
knowledge.
What are the factors necessary for the development of
protoplasmic life, the only life we know ? Reducing Wal-
lace's table to somewhat simpler terms, we may name four
essential conditions, {a) A mean temperature well above
the freezing point, and not in excess of about 73° C.
(&) Water in sufficient quantity, and uniformly dis-
tributed, (c) An atmosphere with an ample supply of
carbon dioxide, and, for higher forms of life, free oxygen.
{d) Sufficient nitrogen or nitrogen compounds, carried
from the air into moist earth or standing water.
The presence and maintenance of these factors require a
heat producing body of approximately the temperature and
distance of the sun ; a planetary mass sufficient to retain a
•Alfred Russel Wallace, 3rd ed., 1905.
48 CHAOS OR COSMOS?
dense atmospliere and hydrosphere ; and volcanic action of
the earth's crust that will keep up the supply of carbon
dioxide. These conditions the earth has fulfilled during
the geologic period, usually estimated (both from the depth
of sedimentary rocks and from the amount of salt in the
ocean) as 100 million years. Have the conditions been
met elsewhere?
None of the other members of our solar system are cap-
able of supporting life. The larger planets are masses of
gas. Mercury, and probably Venus, always presents the
same face to the sun. Mars, the only promising candi-
date, now is considered to have a mean summer tempera-
ture at the equator of — 27° C.^ Its mass, approximately
one-tenth that of the earth, is not sufficient to retain an
atmosphere and hydrosphere. The so-called "canals" are
merely volcanic fissures. Changing colors are not due to
vegetation, but to various salts and oxides, either dry or in
solution. The attempt of Lowell and others to show the
habitability of Mars, has not been creditable to Science.
Able astronomers let their imaginations run riot, and
proved anything they wished to prove, amid deafening
applause from the galleries.
We must guard against similar credulity in regard to
habitable planets in other parts of the sky. Of the im-
mense number of bright stars, very few appear to have
duplicated the conditions of our solar system. A hundred
million years is the time we have assigned to the organic
history of the earth. Careful calculation shows that dur-
ing this period only a little over 2000 stars are likely to
have had close encounters with other stars.'' Only a small
proportion of these encounters would have produced plane-
tary systems. Of the planets thus formed, not all would
furnish the conditions found on our earth.
Wallace's argument, as I have restated it, seems to me
to be against the probability of the simultaneous exist-
"Arrhenius, Destinies of the Stars, 1918, chap. 6.
'See Appendix C. Eahitahle Plcmets among the Stars?
THE EARTH AND THE UNIVERSE 49
ence of another habitable planet. In the immense stretch
of astronomical time the case is somewhat altered. A re-
currence of the conditions found on the earth is possible,
we might say probable. When low forms of life began on
our earth, 100 million years ago, a race of men on some
distant planet may have been just ending their planetary-
career. That is if life always follows in the Universe,
when the conditions necessary for life are met.
If the general probabilities are what I have stated, it
is not necessary to consider Arrhenius' ingenious revival
of the theory that spores from other inhabited worlds
emigrated to our earth through inter-stellar space. Even
if such transfer were possible, spores are far too scarce
an article to fit the case. At best, this solution would
only push the problem one step farther back. The origin
of life still demands explanation.
The present biological situation, in the light of our
conception of the Universe as dynamic rather than mate-
rial, calls for an entirely different line of approach. I
recur to the idea which strongly appealed to Haeckel,
though stated by him with many dogmatisms and incon-
sistencies. The Universe which we know as physical, is
at the same time endowed with the properties which appear
to us as organic and psychical. To put it in another way,
the forces of the Universe will, under certain conditions,
interact with the electron groups which we call Matter,
in the various forms of living protoplasm.
Just what are the conditions of such interaction, the
terms on which the physical may become the organic, we
do not know. But we may hope to learn. The general
hypothesis I have stated, which may be called the working
theory of present-day Biology, has certain practical ad-
vantages. It offers a clue for investigation. It may con-
ceivably be verified by experiment Definite chemical
theories of life's origin are as yet tentative, we might say
premature. They need not be discussed in detail. I
merely refer the reader to Woodruff's excellent summary
60 CHAOS OR COSMOS?
of ^ve recent suggestions: Pfliiger's cyanogen theory,
Moore's law of increasing physical complexity, Allen's
primitive nitrogen compounds, Troland's enzyme theory,
and Oshom's mutually attractive colloids.^
Each important discovery serves to narrow the problem.
As we gain surer knowledge of the structure and activities
of one-celled organisms, as we unravel, step by step, the
marvellous complexity of the albumin molecules which
appear to be the basis of protoplasm, as we learn the
chemical nature of enzymes and other agents of the cell, —
we may expect some day to know and recreate the condi-
tions of organic life. It may never be possible to construct
in the laboratory even the simplest cell. But it is within
the bounds of possibility that we shall be able to put
together some of the simpler aggregations of molecules
from which the cell has grown, and see them showing quasi-
biotic activities.
Such a goal is the inspiration of the modem scientist.
The worker in Biology believes himself to be tracing the
beginnings of that process of organic action and inter-
action which forms one of the most fascinating mysteries
of our mysterious Universe. He might well say, with the
great astronomer, "I think Thy thoughts after Thee."
The religious idea, as stated in the pictorial language of
primitive thought, that God breathed into clay the breath
of life, is entirely consistent with the scientific statement
that, under certain conditions, carbon compounds show
new properties and behavior which we call organic. In
•L. L. Woodruff, in Evolution of the Earth, 1918, lecture 3;
E. Pfliiger, Arch. f. d. ges. Physiol., vol. 10, 1875; Benj. Moore,
Origin cmd Nature of Life, 1912; F. J. Allen, What is Life? Bir-
mingham Nat. Hist, and Philos. Soc., 11, 44, 1899; L. T. Troland,
Mdnist, 24, 92, 1914; and H. F. Osborn, Origin and Evol. of Life,
1917, 67 //. To these should be added the osmosis theory of
Stephanne Leduc, Mechanism of Life, Eng. trans., 1911. See also
articles by E. A. Schafer and H. E. Armstrong, reprinted in Smith-
sonian Inst. Report, 1912, 493, 527; E. A. Minchin, Evolution of
the Cell, Am. Naturalist, 50, pp. 1, 106, 270, 1916; Felix le Dantec,
Nature and Origin of Life, Eng. trans., 1906.
THE EARTH AND THE UNIVERSE 51
fact, if we believe that God is revealed to us in the physical
TTniverse, the two statements are identical.
Man's place in the Universe is not a question of stellar
geography, or of the number of inhabited worlds. The
moral value of human life, the achievements of the human
mind, the development of a social order, — these retain the
place which they held at the beginning of the Christian
era. The Christian hypothesis is not affected by the ex-
panding idea of the world. Modem Astronomy has merely
given human life a larger perspective. Man has become
indeed a cosmopolitan. The Universe of his adjustment
has taken grander outKnes. Our God is a greater God,
He no longer is localized or provincial. But He is the
same God. The very uniformity of Nature must give the
Universe an identical character, whether on the foothills
of an earthly Galilee or in the recesses of Orion.
VI.
THE UNIVERSE UNFOLDING.
In the background of the previous discussion another
question has been lurking. Christianity asserts a goal in
organic creation. God works for a definite end : the mak-
ing and perfecting of Man. Is such teleology consistent
with the facts of Biology as we know them ? This is the
third test of the Christian hypothesis.
The general idea of evolution, rather than special crea-
tion, is entirely consistent with the conception of the Uni-
verse which we have already reached. In fact, no other
view harmonizes with Jesus' idea of God's activity in
Nature. The Master himself suggested the method of
gradual unfolding, though he had no basis for applying
it to biology. If we accept the doctrine of organic evolu-
tion, and conceive of God as working from within rather
than without, we should be prepared to take the conse-
quences. One of these is that the God revealed through
Biology must be the same as the God revealed by Christ.
Otherwise the Christian theory of the Universe would fail
to square with the fact. Man is the culmination of a
long evolutionary process. Was this an accident, or was it
an inevitable result of the forces involved ? Let me review
the question of the origin of species as it stands today. ^
In evolutionary theory, the extreme Darwinians held
the fidd for two generationa. The origin of species was
*A good elementary treatment will be found in John M. Coulter,
Evolution, Heredity and Eugenics, 1916; and, with M. C. Coulter,
Plant Genetics, 1918. See also R. C. Punett, Mendelism, 5th ed.,
1919; T. H. Morgan, Evolution and Ado/ptation, 1903; Physical
Basis of Inheritance, 1919; W. Bateson, Prohlema of Genetics,
1913.
fi2
THE UmVEKSE UNFOLDING 53
attributed to minute fluctuations, in size, color, form and
organs. These, if of any advantage in the intense struggle
for existence, were perpetuated by natural selection. The
individuals lacking this small advantage were extermi-
nated. These selected organisms were in turn subject to
fluctuation and selection. The net result was a slow but
definite modification of structure, by which they became
better adapted to surrounding conditions. Continued long
enough, and with the environment changing from time to
time, the process was supposed to bring into being the
millions of distinct varieties and species found on our
planet. Progress represented the summation of a series
of fortunate accidents. Natural Selection was the deus
ex machina. The successful individual or species was a
sort of juggernaut, riding to power over the bleeding bodies
of those that had failed in the struggle, proved themselves
unfitted to survive. It was a complete though cruel pic-
ture. Some biologists still hold to it in toto; parts of it
must be retained on any theory. The doctrine of progress
through struggle left a deep and in many ways unfor-
tunate impression on the thought of our age. The World
War was a logical consequence of the idea that you must
kill off your competitors in order to survive.
Another era began in 1900, with the rediscovery of
MendeFs principle of unit characters, and de Vries' study
of mutations in the evening primrose. The new school of
Biology differs from the old in three important particu-
lars. In the first place, the study of genetics is on an
experimental basis. The specific characters of plant and
animal groups must be determined, not by surface resem-
blances, but through breeding experiments in the labora-
tory. Mendel's law makes possible the manipulation and
control of the various factors which are brought out by
crossing and segregated in line breeding. Secondly, at-
tention is directed, not to fluctuations, but to true varia-
tions, which hg^ve their seat in the germ cell. Johannsen
showed that in a pure line, though the size fluctuated con-
U CHAOS OE COSMOS?
stantly, the differences were not inherited, and could not be
selected in a way to affect the mean of the race. The mod-
em plant or animal breeder goes deeper, and works with
heritable factors. These may be either recombinations or
mutations.^
In the third place, the mutationist school has given up
hunting for reasons why the new form is better fitted to
survive. Adaptation is no longer the sole criterion for
species making. Struggle has no necessary connection
with progress. The new characters that appear may be of
distinct adrantage to the organism, and again they may
not. If mutations or new combinations manage to secure
a foothold, they will live on side by side with the older
and possibly more adaptable type. ITature is a very hos-
pitable host.^ Advance in structure has probably been by
large rather than small steps. It is only in the case of a
new factor which represents marked improvement in
adaptation, that selection tends to weed out older forms.
The one-toed horse displaced the two-toed horse, very much
as the pneumatic tire displaced the. solid rubber tire on
the bicycle.
This shift of scientific opinion not only cuts the ground
from under the competition theory, in its applications to
man's social history. It enables us to take the organic
world as we find it, in its infinite and fascinating variety,
without that inventing of imaginary means to serve hypo-
thetical ends, which vitiated the whole Darwinian school,
as it did the earlier school of Paley. If there is teleology
in l!Tature, it is not of the pure natural selection brand.
The one-toed horse is a one-toed horse because a certain
recombination of factors in its germ plasm, with which
'See Appendix D. The Emergence of a Neio Species.
'Survival is chiefly a question of fortunate location, or of indi-
vidual reproductive power and general vigor, and in cross-fertilized
plants the most vigorous individuals are hybrids. Pure lines are
largely man's creation. Most of the forms which have been made
or discovered in the laboratory, and used for starting new lines,
would not have been selected automatically by Nature.
THE UOTVEESE UNFOLDINa 55
selection was not concerned, gave it one toe on each foot
instead of two.
What are these factors, or "genes," which lie at the hasis
of the origin of species, and which the plant breeder is
able to some extent to manipulate ? We do not know, any
more than the chemist, up to a few years ago, knew the
nature of the elements he mixed in his test tubes. I mean
this comparison to suggest two things. The progress of
Science may be expected to throw definite light on the
problem. And the solution is likely to be found in the
field of organic chemistry. Castle, whose return to the
mutationist ranks is an event of the greatest importance,
states that the result of his recent experiments with
piebald rats "favors the widely accepted view that the
single gene is not subject to fluctuating variability, but is
stable like a chemical compound of definite composition,
and changes only similarly, by definite steps." *
From the standpoint of Physics, which no physical
phenomena can escape, organisms represent the transfor-
mation of familiar and measurable energies, and the
rearrangement of equally familiar atoms and molecules.
The transformations and arrangments are of very much
greater complexity than in the organic field. But they are
the same in kind, and follow the same laws. Recent lit-
erature bears eloquent witness to this general fact.^ There
is a growing impression that evolution, whether in stars
or crystals, in colloids or organisms, is one process, which
in all its phases is equally characteristic of the Universe.^
If the environment of the organism is physico-chemical,
and the germ cell is itself a physico-chemical phenomenon,
variation, like life itself, must be due to the interaction of
these two sets of closely related factors. In this regard
the religious and scientific standpoints are identical, since
our knowledge of God's method in Evolution is derived
*W. E. Castle, Proo. Nat. Acad. Sci., 5, 126, 1919.
* See Appendix E. Chemistry and the Organism.
• This view has been ably presented by L. J. Henderson, Fitness of
the Environment, 1913; Order of Nature, 1917.
66 CHAOS OE COSMOS?
solely from the study of ISTatiire. It is not necessary to
suppose that God acts through a hypothetical entelechy or
vital force. When we once recognize the essentially dy-
namic character of the physical Universe, God may act
equally well through an enzyme or an amino acid.
I ask the reader to hold in aheyance the question as to
whether variation, which lies at the basis of the origin of
species, is anything more than the interaction of one part
of the Universe with another. "We are concerned in this
chapter with the question of Teleology in regard to the
evolutionary process as a whole. In discussing Chaos or
Cosmos, it is vitally important to know whether organic
history represents team-work toward a definite goal, or
whether it is a free-for-all that only happens to arrive
anywhere. We do not ask at this point what the organism
is in itself, or how we are to explain the element of "be-
havior," the apparent striving of the living unit toward
specific ends. In the next section of our book I shall take
up the problem of the Individual.
From our present point of view, organic evolution is an
"energy traffic," to use Allen's term, through the medium
of organic machines, of ever increasing complexity. The
most complete development of this idea is that of Osborn,
in his Origin and Evolution of Life J Beginning with the
Bacteria, which are able to capture the energy in certain
chemical elements, we pass to the Algae, whose acquire-
ment of chlorophyll makes it possible to transform the
energy in solar rays. The Plants represent a higher de-
velopment of this function. At a later stage, the Protozoa,
through their better chemical equipment, break up the
energy already accumulated by the bacteria and algae on
which they feed. This type of energy transformer is de-
veloped further in the many-celled animals, which likewise
depend on organic material, largely green plants. The
'H. F. Osborn, 1917. A brief outline of this theory is given in
Appendix F, The Evolution of the Organic Machine. Cf. D. M. S.
Watson, Science Progress, 11, 216, 1916 j Richard S. Lull, in Evol. of
the Earth, 1918, lecture 4.
THE UNIVERSE UNFOLDING 67
process culminates in the various Vertebrate types. These
show an increasingly complex and adaptable mechanism
for transforming the energy stored in the food supply.
As Osborn puts it, "the solar energy transformed into the
chemical potential energy of the compounds of carbon,
hydrogen, and oxygen in the plants is transformed by the
animal into motion and heat and then dissipated. Thus
in the life cycle we observe both the conservation and the
degradation of energy, corresponding with the first and
second laws of thermodynamics." ®
In the development of this energy traffic, we note three
parallel series of changes. The first is that of the physical
environment. It is necessary to keep constantly in mind
the geologic fluctuations which have taken place during
these hundred million years or more. The readjustment
of the earth's surface, due to shrinkage of the planetary
mass, brought periodic changes, both in the character of
the land and in the distribution of land and water areas.
At the beginning of each geologic era, we see the re-eleva-
tion of continental mountain ranges. This was accom-
panied by a cold period, which disarranged all organic
life. At least six of these major crises are known. Minor
readjustments of the earth's crust brought radical if less
severe changes in climate.
Corresponding with these physical changes are those in
the general life environment. Each period of the history
has its characteristic fauna and flora. The organism must
face new enemies, whether predatory creatures or disease-
bearing parasites. The food supply is altered : in variety,
quantity and distribution. In the Cenozoic era, for
example, the emergence of warm-blooded Mammals seems
to be associated with the rise of flowering plants and
grasses. The drying up of central Asia, at a later period,
compelled the early Primates to descend from the trees.
The third line of change, with which we are specially
concerned, is that in the organic machine itseK. The
•Op. oit., 53.
58 CHAOS OK COSMOS?
situa/fcion, particularly at certain epochs, put a premium
on adaptability. This might take the direction of im-
proved chemical equipment, which made it possible for
the organism to utilize new types of food. It might lie
along the line of greater disease-resistance. It might rep-
resent an improved mechanism, whether for capturing
food, for escaping enemies, or for producing or protect-
ing offspring. Each geologic crisis is marked by the scrap-
ping of much of the previous machinery. "The rulers of
the various domains find themselves overtrained and over-
specialized, and succumb one after another to the changing
environment. Their places are taken by the small, less
specialized, and heretofore little known stocks, which
quickly adapt themselves to their environments and become
the dominatoTS of the organisms about them. In all of this
unceasing organic struggle most of the unadaptive families
fail to continue; others are pushed by the pulse of life
into the less desirable places, where they continue to live
as static forms — the living fossils that tell us so much that
is most interesting of once prominent stocks of plants and
animals ; but at all times much of life quickly responds to
the changing environment and is remodelled into the more
fit, active, and alert types." ^
Whatever the explanation may be, students of Paleon-
tol(^y are agreed that the evolutionary changes in any type
have tended to show progressive adaptation. The empha-
sis or suppression of earlier structures or proportions has
been more or less continuous, involving small successive
changes. The jaw of the horse may be used as an example.
Taking first the premolars, no horse from the Lower
Eocene has been found with any fully molariform teeth.
All horses from the Middle Eocene have two molariform
teeth in the lower jaw. From the Upper Eocene, all horses
have four such teeth. In the Oligocene they have six.
Turning to the molars, older horses, as in the Oligocene,
have brachyodont teeth without cement. All Miocene
•Chas. Schuchert, in Ewl. of the Earth, 1918, 81.
THE UNIVEESE UNFOLDING 59
horses are progressively hypsodont, with a progressive in-
crease in the amount of cement. The milk teeth of
Miocene horses have practically no cement. Those of all
Pliocene and later horses are heavily cemented.^^
Something of the same process appears to have been
going on in the evolution of the nervous system. Only
the last steps in the long and fascinating story can be sug-
gested here. The arboreal life of the early Primates
favored a high development of the senses of vision, touch
and hearing, with the corresponding brain areas. Com-
pelled by further geologic changes to descend to the
ground, a partly erect attitude and walking gait allow
the development of the hands and fingers. This in turn
brings further growth and specialization of the brain. The
Neanderthal race, which flourished in Europe in the early
Pleistocene (perhaps 800,000 years ago), stands erect, has
a well-developed opposable thumb, and the brain centers
controlling the motions of the limbs, hands and fingers are
well developed. There is only a rudimentary develop-
ment of the anterior centers of the brain, associated with
speech and ideation. By the Aurignacean age, placed by
Osbom at 25,000 years ago, but probably very much
earlier. Homo Sapiens possesses his full powers. ^^
Our interpretation of organic evolution as the perfect-
ing of a physico-chemical mechanism, correlated with an
environment of the same essential character, is of course
only provisional. But it has the advantage of being stated
in the same terms that are now being used for the origin
of life.^^ Let us see where this interpretation leads us.
It is perfectly clear that God did not plan out the details
of creation, as a human executive would lay out a schema
"Wm. K. Gregory, Am. Naturalist, 50, 622, 1917, with quotation
from W. D. Matthew. The series of evolutionary changes men-
tioned may have covered a period of 12 million years.
"H. F. Osbom, Men of the Old Stone Age, 3rd ed., 1918; G. Elliot
Smith, Evolution of Man, reprinted in Smithsonian Inst. Report,
1912, 553; Jos. Barrell, 8ci. Monthly, 4, 16, 1917.
"See ante p. 49.
60 CHAOS OR COSMOS?
of development, to be put througli according to a certain
schedule. N"or can we think of the result as a matter
of chance. The Universe arrives. The perfecting of the
animal food supply makes possible the evolution of animal
life. A growing adaptability to changing environments
culminates in the intelligent mastery of the earth by the
human species. If there is life on other worlds, we have
every reason to suppose that organic evolution would fol-
low parallel lines, and reach a similar specialization of the
nervous system. But it has taken a hundred million years.
And the Universe does its work in its own way.
The picture of God which we gain is not that of a great
Engineer working from without, as in pre-Darwinian days.
"Not is He the Supreme Judge of the iN'atural Selection
theory, a sort of magnified Biometrician, an olympian
Karl Pearson, measuring rival claims to adaptation and
remorselessly sentencing to death the less successful.
Rather we are led to think of a Divine Universe unfolding
from within. The individual organism may be thought
of as a part of the Whole, or as a semi-independent energy
transformer, closely interacting with the Environment.
In either case the transformation of known energies ac-
cording to partially known laws, gives us a working ex-
planation of organic history. We are not concerned here
with the reason why the Universe unfolds, but merely with
the fact that it does. Such self-expression appears entirely
natural, and in harmony with what we know of God in His
physical manifestation. Life does not behave like a cosmic
blunder or accident.
This idea of a dynamic Universe unfolding from within,
is what the Christian hypothesis really calls for. The
process is not the chance aggregation of material particles,
but the outworking of Divine forces. The simplest bacil-
lus shows an assemblage of atom groups which we do not
find in the entire inorganic world. In organization and
potential power, the advance from the amoeba to the tyrant
dinosaur, from the dinosaur to man, is like the development
THE UNIVEESE UNFOLDING 61
of machinery from human muscle to the modem dynamo.
The Universe of which man is in some sense a part, reveals
throughout geologic history a growth in complexity, in
variety, in the perfecting of form, in the adapting of means
to ends, in the control of physical energy for further crea-
tion, before which we all stand in reverent wonder.
PAKT n.
THE KELATION OF MAN TO THE
UNIVERSE.
PART II.
THE RELATIOlSr OF MAIST TO THE
UNIVERSE.
VII.
THE MAKING OF MAN.
How are we to think of a dynamic Universe, which
snows also the phenomena of evolving Life ? Two general
views are possible. There are divergent tendencies of
thought, which may be called respectively Monism and
Pluralism. Whether we follow the first or the second will
make a good deal of difference in the place we give to
Man as an individual.
The monist puts it in this way. The Universe is an all-
inclusive unity, the sum total of what we know as God,
Matter, Life and Mind — the Whole of which we are a
part, and to whose completeness we may perhaps con-
tribute. This theory has taken many forms. In Religion
it appears as Pantheism. God is Himself the All, and my
life is a current in the great ocean of His life. Such an
interpretation is fascinating to many minds. It gives
logical symmetry to the apparently disjointed facts of the
world. It offers a kind of Nirvana to the distracted, hard-
pressed spirit of man. Reality is an Absolute Monarch,
to whom we should submit. The Universe must take the
final responsibility for evil and pain.
Pluralism likewise has taken many forms. The con-
trasting theory which I wish to consider makes the present
Universe a social order. It asserts the dignity and worth
65
66 CHAOS OE COSMOS?
of the individual man, as lie faces the external world. As
Pascal said : "Though the Universe crush me, I am greater
than the Universe. For I can know of my defeat, but the
Universe can never know of its victory." "Under the
bludgeonings of chance," shouts Henley, "my head is
bloody, but unbowed." Yet it is not necessary to shake
one's fist at the Universe. If man with his unconquerable
soul is a part of it, he has a responsibility for its shaping
and its final outcome. He shares the defeats and the vic-
tories. The static unity of the monist becomes an unfold-
ing social order, a Kepublic of conscious units. With
the external world, which the Christian calls a manifesta-
tion of God, with this vast dynamic system upon which
the individual is so closely dependent, man's relation is
not one of subjection but of cooperation. The Universe
has ceased to be a despotism.
Christianity holds to this latter theory. Man not only
communes with God through ISTature. 'He cooperates with
God in ISTature. With the general truth of this position
the Christian hypothesis must stand or fall.
In this and succeeding chapters, I shall sketch various
human activities and functions, which suggest what we
might term the democratic character of the Universe. Our
journey will be a somewhat long and rambling one; I
trust it will not be without interest. We cannot hurry
through the daily life of Man as if we were intellectual
Cook's tourists. For convenience I shall continue to call
the two rival theories Pluralism and Monism. The exact
connection between the external world and God lies out-
side of this book, though our 'discussion will illustrate
Jesus' idea of God as present in every aspect of our daily
adjustment.^
*I also leave undetermined the relation of the lower organisms
to the Universe. (See the opposite views of the individual held by
T. H. Morgan, Phys. Basis of Heredity, 1919; Jacques Loeb, Organ-
ism as a Whole, 1916; and Wm. E. Ritter, Unity of the Orga/nism,
1919.) These show a creative activity that is somewhat similar
THE MAKING OF MAN 67
Our first evidence for the cooperative character of the
Universe appears in the making of Man himself. In the
perpetuation of the race, we find him sharing creation at
its highest. Man's part in this task begins with procrea-
tion. The normal function of men and women is parent-
hood. On the voluntary union of the sexes depends the
very existence of the human units which represent the
climax of organic evolution.
It is not strange that the fact of sex is one of the
dominating factors in human history. Taking its rise in
the earliest forms of life, as an alternative to other forms
of reproduction, it soon becomes a normal differentiation
of function. The sexual instincts evolve side by side with
the changes in structure. Whatever the forms of court-
ship or of union, the fundamental facts, when studied
under the microscope, are everywhere strangely similar.
In Man, as in the plants and animals that share his world,
the sperm brings to the egg the stimulus to reproduction.
Each contributes one-half of the factors which determine
the character of the new life. And at once, through the
action of God's physico-chemical forces, there begins in the
body of the mother that marvellous development by which
the single fertilized cell becomes a complete reproduction
of the parents, able to take its part in the creation of the
world. No act is more sacred, more essentially religious.
As Bryan Hooker sings, of the fathers dead in the World
War:
For the flower from the clod emerging
And the fire from the cloud released.
For the wife that is more than virgin
And the man that is more than beast;
For the spirit in strange communion
With earth, yet more than earth —
but very much less developed. If the Universe has changed from
Monism to Pluralism, as human activities seem to show, we might
expect the differentiation to be by gradual steps.
68 CHAOS OE COSMOS?
The mystery of union.
The miracle of birth —
For these, and what holier dreaming
Our dust and its deeds have meant,
You are the blood redeeming —
You are the Sacrament.
Jesus' practical emphasis on the sacredness of marriage
and sexual passion finds expression in Paul's words, that
the human body is a temple of the Holy Spirit, never to be
desecrated or defiled. The sex impulse is to be controlled,
and if necessary subordinated and diverted. But it is to
be used, not outlawed. Biology has strengthened rather
than weakened this position. Religion stands on solid
ground when it considers every union of sperm and egg
cells the creation of a new life, sacred as all human life is
sacred, whose wilful destruction is murder, and when it
regards any such union of cells that does not aim at repro-
duction as a sin against God the Creator. The act itself
has been a prayer for the creation of a new life. So great
is the responsibility for this share in the creative act,
that it demands the wisest planning, and the freest and
fullest cooperation. The prevention of conception follows
of necessity, if we recognize that voluntary and temperate
intercourse in marriage, the sharing of mutual passion
with one another and with God, is an act of worship, of
the highest moral and spiritual value.
The facts indicate that this principle of sex relations,
given by Jesus, is a law written into the very structure of
the Universe. Every instinct has a biological value, and
that of sexual desire is linked with God in the Divine
work of creation. The parity of the sexes in monogamous
marriage, and the restriction of intercourse to those who
enter this relation, is the result of a long series of experi-
ments in the history of the race. Wherever the principle
of creative cooperation has been followed, it has meant
the moral elevation of manhood, of womanhood, of child-
THE MAKING OF MAN 69
hood. Wherever it has been disobeyed, in loose sexual
relations or in prostitution, the result has been the degra-
dation of a vast multitude of women, the loss of self-control
and physical virility in men, and a spread of sexual disease
that has lowered the birth-rate and left a heritage of dis-
eased or abnormal offspring. That which is one of the
primal religious impulses degenerates into lust and ob-
scenity. Failure to adjust ourselves to the Universe,
through the proper functioning of the sex instinct, is sin,
and the wages of sin is death. The removal of the causes
of prostitution and abnormal desire, the sublimation of this
natural impulse, the opening of other channels for its
expression — this is one of the greatest tasks which a Chris-
tian civilization faces. ^
We hear much today of the science of Eugenics. It will
be well for us to consider both its possibilities and its
limits.
There are laws of heredity in the Universe, just as truly
as there are laws of chemical combination or physical stress.
What is present in the germ plasm of the parents will
reappear in their children. Conversely, we cannot trans-
mit anything that we do not ourselves possess. The char-
acters and abilities acquired by father and mother in the
course of their lives, do not modify the germ and sperm
cells, and so cannot be handed on. From our present evi-
dence, it seems probable that the embryo is not definitely
affected by the environment, except through malnutrition
or direct poisoning. The child will start at birth about
where its parents started at their birth.
*Jane Addams, The Spirit of Youth and the City Streets, 1909;
A. A. Brill, Psychoanalysis, 2nd ed., 1914. For other subjects
treated in this chapter, see W. J. Robinson, Birth Control, 1917 ;
Paul Popenoe and R. J. Johnson, Applied Eugenics, 1918, somewhat
polemical in tone, but judicious and avoiding the errors of previous
works; E. G. Conkljn, Heredity and Environment, 1915; Franz
Boas, Mind of Primitive Man, 1911; John B. Watson, Behavior,
1914; Chas. W. Waddle, Introd. to Child Psychology, 1918; Wm.
McDougall, Social Psychology, 13th ed., 1918; Maurice Parmelee^
Science of Huma/n Behavior, 1913.
70 CHAOS OE COSMOS?
Thus far it has not been possible to resolve into definite
factors the many complex influences which determine the
inheritance of physical and mental traits. We know too
little to lay down definite rules such as those used by the
plant or animal breeder. All we can say is that the re-
sponsibility for healthy mating rests heavily upon the in-
dividual and upon Society. Other things being equal, the
child which at birth is the most perfect physical animal
has a better chance all through its life.
Studies of American school children, and later of sol-
diers, by the Binet-Simon and other tests, have shown a
very wide range of intelligence, grading all the way from
idiocy to genius, the greatest number coming near the mid-
dle of the scale. Counting 100 as normal, Terman found
2% of school children testing 128 or above, 2% testing
73 or below, and 60% ranging from 91 to 110. Similar
results have appeared when tests were made for special
lines of mental ability. Temperament probably varies in
the same way, though an adequate system of classification
is not at hand. Proper allowance must be made for other
contributing factors. But the differences appear to be in
the main congenital. From a biological standpoint, all
men are not created equal.
Differences in temperament and mental ability are not
correlated with physical features, in normal cases. They
must be attributed to independent series of mutations.
Every so-called "race" is composed of an almost unlimited
number of strains. The same climatic influences or geo-
graphic isolation which brought about the average differ-
ences in physical type, might result in average differences
in temperament and intelligence.
Doubtless man's evolution is continuous. Favorable,
and unfavorable, mutations and recombinations may occur
here and there, in any group. Each person born is a new
individual type. But the net result is the same. There
will be no Supermen. The success of government and mis-
sion schools among the lowest savage tribes, indicates that
THE MAKING OF MAN 71
the mean intelligence of Homo Sapiens has not been raised
by any process of natural selection.^ Intelligence varies
the world over because it always has varied, and such dif-
ferences are inherited. Present deviations from the mean
are not altered by immigration, but only redistributed. We
hope for more children from the more intelligent indi-
viduals and groups, and fewer children from the less intel-
ligent. Civilization needs leaders, and it needs the high-
est possible average. But any healthy strain has valuable
contributions to make to the human capital of the Uni-
verse.
Statistical studies bear out the statement that the mean
intelligence of the race remains at about the same level.
Although the mating of persons of high or low intelligence
may raise or lower the average for several generations, the
"drag" of previous ancestry and intermarriage with other
grades tend to bring the group back toward the mean.
In the statistical laws of inheritance worked out by Pear-
son, the expected contribution of the parents is given as
.6244. That of grandparents is .1988, and of great-
grandparents .0630. As stated by East and Jones, "the
brightest examples of inherent mental ability have come
and will come from chance mating in the general popula-
tion, the common people so-called, because of the variability
there existent.'^ ^ The task of Eugenics is to encourage
the reproduction of those members of society who show
superior mental traits, and to check the reproduction of
those whose mental power is abnormally low. To work for
either of these ends is aid in the Divine work of creation.
The problem cannot be met merely by selective mating,
and the willingness of superior stocks to bear offspring.
It involves the whole range of social questions. War en-
ters into it, as do commerce and taxation. We must also
pay attention to housing, health, the relation between in-
•To give a single example, Porteua' tests of aboriginal children
in Australia show an average deviation of only five months from
the standard for whites. PsycJiol. Review, 24, 32, 1917.
* Inbreeding and Outhreedingy 1919, 244.
72 CHAOS OR COSMOS?
comes and cost of living, education, opportunities for socilil
life, and the proper treatment of defectives and delin-
quents.
But tlie making of Man has only begun at birth. These
individuals, of many physical types, with various tem-
peraments, with different degrees of congenital mental
capacity, are so much raw material which Society is to
mold into the finished product. The child is born with a
completed body, but a very incomplete brain. His nerve-
cells, or neurones, are in place, with all their latent poten-
tialities. Some of them are fully developed, making pos-
sible the instinctive reflexes of the new-bom child. But
the majority, especially the neurones of the cerebral hemi-
spheres, are yet unfinished. They must extend their
branches, and develop their insulating sheaths. The asso-
ciation neurones, which have appeared latest in the his-
tory of evolution, will be the last to complete their growth.
Although this development is largely carried out by God,
along the lines laid down by heredity, the plasticity of the
child brain gives the individual and those responsible for
his training a chance for cooperation of the most definite
kind.
The fundamental distinction between man and his first
cousins among the higher mammals, like the gorilla and
chimpanzee, is not in physical features, or in the size and
arrangement of the brain. It lies rather in what man is
able to teach his brain to do, by virtue of his inheriting a
well developed speech mechanism. In early infancy, the
child trains certain centers in his left brain, if he is
right-handed, or in his right brain, if he is left-handed;
for the training is done largely through the use of the hand
in feeling and gesturing. By the training of these centers,
he is able to name his mental recepts and achieve ideas
and spoken words, as the gorilla cannot. He learns to
write, to play musical instruments, to operate elaborate
machines. The gorilla species, in other respects, has prac-
tically as good machinery in the brain as the human
THE MAKING OF MAN 73
species. But being without a speech mechanism in throat
and brain, it lacks the power, and always did lack the
power, and always will, to develop the rest of the cerebral
machinery and put it to the fullest use. The normal
human baby possesses that power. He will inevitably
become a thinking being. He persists in training his
hands. We could not prevent him from talking, even if he
must make a language of his own.
This distinguishing feature in Man, the training of one
of the hemispheres of the brain, takes place after birth.
It continues for about sixteen years, and to some extent
through life. For each individual, the limits of such
training are set by heredity. But the training itself is a
matter of environment, of the child's surroundings and
schooling. Up to the point where development is possible,
man makes his own brain. He shapes his own character.
He determines his own relations with the Universe. As
Dr. Thompson has said: "While all individuals of our
race are not born with equally good brains, yet the fact
remains that the special mental capacities for which cer-
tain men have become eminent were all acquired and were
not congenital." ^
All education must be self -education. But the guiding
of it is a sacred function, a cooperation with God in the
greatest of all tasks. A pedagogical revolution is slowly
going forward, due to the iafluence of Kousseau, Froebel
and Pestalozzi. Education is coming to be a process of
natural growth, rather than the acquiring of a certain
amount of information. It is not "something to be forced
upon children and youth from without, but is the growth
of capacities with which human beings are endowed at
birth." «
■ Wm. M. Thomson, Bram cmd Personality, 1908, 233.
'John and Evelyn Dewey, SchooU of Tomorrow, 1915, 2. See
also John Dewey, Democracy and Education, 1916; E. L. Thorn-
dike, Educational Psychol., 1913; Frank N. Freeman, How Children
Learn, 1917; E. P. Cubberley, Public Education in the U. 8., 1919;
Alexander Inglis, Prm'a of Secondary Eduction, 1918.
74 CHAOS OK COSMOS?
To fail in developing the full capacity of any human
child, of whatever race, is to block the work of creation,
or leave it only half completed. Terman's studies show
that individuals with an Intelligence Quotient of 70
may reach a mental age of 11, or an equivalent of fifth
grade work in school. An I. Q. of 80 represents a mental
age of 12^2? or seventh grade. "A large proportion of the
tasks in the modern organization of industries can be as
well performed by individuals of the 70 or 75 I. Q.
class as by those of superior intelligence, and with more
satisfaction in the performance. Mentality of eleven years
is ample for ordinary kinds of unskilled labor, and many
of the semi-skilled trades are within reach of those who
test a year or two higher. To make the most of this
grade of ability, however, it must be trained. For chil-
dren who test below 75 or 80 I. Q., genuine vocational
training should largely replace the usual curriculum of
the Upper grammar grades." He instances M., a Portu-
guese boy, leaving school at 16, after struggling painfully
through the sixth grade. His mental age is 10%, and
his Intelligence Quotient 72. He cannot be rated as feeble-
minded. "About ordinary affairs his judgment is depend-
able, and he is steady, industrious and anxious to make
good. There are probably many kinds of semi-skilled work
in which he could succeed. For none of these has he
received any preparation. Aiter nine years in school, he
faces the world with no vocational asset but his God-given
brawn. There are approximately a million children like
M. in the public schools of the United States." "^
Vocational training has a broader aspect. All children,
of lower or higher intelligence, need guidance in their
choice of a life work, and adequate preparation for it.
They must learn to adjust themselves to the present indus-
trial and democratic era. There is a growing feeling
among progressive educators that the mere trade school
does not meet the situation. The demands of industry
'L. M. Terman, Intelligence of School Children, 1919, 133 /.
THE MAKING OF MAN 76
and of citizenship cannot be met without broad and uni-
versal equipment. ^The democracy which proclaims
equality of opportunity as its ideal requires an education
in which learning and social application, ideas and prac-
tice, work and recognition of the meaning of what is done,
are united from the beginning and for all." ^
In this cooperative task, the influence of the home, of
the church, of the play life, of associates and surroundings,
must rank with that of the trained teacher. We are com-
ing to learn that the making of man is an extremely com-
plex process, involving a constant interaction between hu-
man instincts craving expression, and the social environ-
ment which encourages or hinders such expression. Take,
for example, Parker's analysis of the Western hobo. "The
history of the migratory workers shows that starting with
the long hours and dreary winters of the farms they ran
away from, or the sour-smelling bunk-house in a coal
village, through their character-debasing experience with
the drifting ^ire and fire' life in the industries, on to the
vicious social and economic life of the winter unemployed,
their training predetermined but one outcome, and the en-
vironment produced its type." ^ Eepression of the natural
instincts of children and adults is fraught with grave dan-
ger to Society as well as to the subject. It leads either to
weakness, inefficiency and moral debasement; or compen-
sation is sought in some more or less violent form of
revolt.
Since man became man, 400,000 years ago, the real
evolution of the race, as we shall see in the following
chapters, has been the evolution of social equipment: the
gathering of an increasing store of ideas and experience,
of tools, institutions, customs, outlets for expression, which
are at the service of each child born into the tribe or
nation. Herein lies the primary advantage of the civilized
^Schools of Tomorrow, 315. See later p. 205. For Vocational
Guidance: Meyer Bloomfield, Youth, School and Vocation, 1915.
•Carleton H. Parker, The Casual Laborer, 1920, 123.
76 CHAOS OE COSMOS?
child, at its best, over the savage, of the child from a good
home over the child from the slum, or the backwoods. It
is bom into an inheritance larger, richer, more fitted to
express man's instinctive desires and reactions, and des-
tined to become still better and more general, as God's
partners in Creation rise up to mold the conditions under
which children are bom, and men and women live their
lives.
In regard to many points in this chapter, there may be
difference of opinion. But the differences would affect the
distribution of the several factors involved, rather than the
general situation. The making of Man is not an event but
a process. And in that process the human race has a
definite and responsible share. At any point, men are able
to alter the creative work, to check it or reverse it. Crea-
tion, instead of being completed at a certain prehistoric
date, is going on before our eyes. The hundred million
years of organic evolution, which gave us man's body,
are as nothing compared with the cooperative evolution
in the life of each human child, which gives us his mind,
trained or untrained, stunted and warped and marred, or
developed and broadened and ennobled.
vin.
BUILDING THE WORLD OF THOUGHT.
When I enter the University Library, I have a realizing
sense of the powers of the human mind. On the shelves
are books and periodicals ranging over the whole field
of human interest. Each year new knowledge is added
to the rapidly growing accumulation. Scientific reviews
record from month to month the work of thousands of
investigators, in every civilized country.
Man has not been content to take the world for granted.
His mental adjustment to the Universe has been of a
very active kind. There is nothing to suggest the unfold-
ing of a Universal Mind, the varied consciousness of one
instantaneous Knower, a mosaic of Thought whose pat-
tern is eternally complete in what Koyce terms "the unity
of the Absolute Experience." The picture we gain is
rather that of a multitude of independent creators, slowly
becoming acquainted with the Universe in which they are
placed, and building out of it a world of objects and values
and laws. Man does not make the Universe, but he makes
it known. ^
Let us look more closely at the nature of this adjust-
ment. It begins in a most practical fashion. The world
in which man lives contains various forces and bodies with
which he comes in contact. Light waves, impinging on
*Any one wishing to follow further the themes treated in this
chapter might consult with profit: W. B. Pillsbury, Fundamentals
of Psychology, 1916; James R. Angell, Psychology, 1904; Hugo
Mjiinsterberg, Psychology, 1914; C. S. Sherrington, Integrative Ac-
tion of the Nervous System, 1911; Boris Sidis, Foundations of Nor-
mal and Abnormal Psychol., 1914; Joseph Jastrow, The Suhcorir
scious, 1906; Kate Gordon, Esthetics, 1909.
77
78 CHAOS OE COSMOS?
these bodies, are reflected toward him. Through the evolu-
tion of his animal ancestors in such a world, the human
child inherits machinery for receiving and recording such
contacts with the Universe, and reacting to them in definite
ways. Innumerable reactions teach him to correlate these
sense impressions, to compare them, to generalize them
into recepts and concepts. And by means of these con-
•cepts, which language makes it possible to name, he forms
his interpretation of the world, in terms of things and
their qualities. This interpretation is so familiar that we
are likely to take it for granted, regard it as preordained
and always existing. On the contrary, it is man's own
creation, a mental mechanism, a series of intellectual short-
cuts, which enable him to know the Universe and adapt
himself to it. The Universe supplies the raw material for
thought: light and sound waves, forces and masses, rela-
tions and sequences. Man works up this raw material into
objects and attributes, judgments of value, associations,
inferences. It is a very real cooperation between Man
and his Environment. The correspondence of our ideas
with the external world is not a preestablished but an
achieved harmony.
What a mighty creation is a word. What magic power
it brings. To pick out an object from experience, or the
experience itself, make an abstraction of it, choose a cer-
tain sound to be its name. Merely by speaking that
name, to call up in the minds of one's fellows a picture
of the object, with all its dreaded or desired qualities. To
name a thing, to have an idea of it, is to detach it from
the confused unknown, to gain a certain advantage over it,
to possess it, to make it a stepping-stone to other dis-
coveries and possessions. The idea is man's own, having
no existence until he formed it, with no meaning except
such as he chooses to give. The word was not, until,
by the exercise of a god-like power, man spoke and it be-
gan to be, as his messenger and servant. And through
these simple but serviceable tools of thought, shared as part
BUILDING THE WOELD OF THOUGHT n
of the conunon stock of horde or tribe, and constantly
increased and perfected by new experiences, the savage is
able to live his life, to predict the future, to subdue the
earth to his need, to develop customs and institutions and
sagas and myths.
And Civilization is merely the improvement of these
same mental tools, which the race has been using for some
400,000 years. We still pick out certain facts of experi-
ence, which are revealed to us through our God-given
sense impressions, and call tiiem things, attributing to
them certain qualities and behavior. We still create new
names for new experiences. But the rapid accumulation
of knowledge, recorded now in written and printed speech,
has not only increased our supply of tools. It has enabled
us to use them more accurately. We have formed new
abstractions, and made wider generalizations. We group
our experiences into general laws. By means of these
laws, which are as truly man's creation as the first spoken
word, we are able to make new predictions, to know the
forces of the Universe and harness them for our use, to
test and correct our sense impressions, to construct physical
mechanisms that open the way to further power and
achievement, to expand sagas into literatures, and myths
into philosophies. Man has begun to know and utilize
the Universe. But it is only a beginning. A hundred
years hence the books on our library shelves, as a picture
of the real world, will seem as crude as the books of a
century ago appear to the scholars of today.
Knowledge is a means to an end, and that end is man's
adjustment to the Universe. We must know it, for we live
in it. We must know its physical forces before we can
harness them. We must know its moral forces, before we
can shape our lives and our institutions aright. Of this
I shall speak at length in the closing section of our book.
With the growing specialization in scientific research and
teaching, there is grave danger that we shall lose sight
of the Universe itself, of which these subjects are but
80 CHAOS OR COSMOS?
"abstracted phases and elements." The aim of a finished
education, as Small pointed out over twenty years ago, is
"conscious conformity of individuals to the coherent cos-
mic reality of which they are parts. Until our pedagogy
rests upon a more intelligent cosmic foundation, and espe-
cially upon a more complete synthesis of social philosophy,
we can hardly expect curricula to correspond with the
essential conditions to which human action must learn to
conform." ^
The cooperation between Man and God in mental labor
has an even more intimate phase. Activity of the brain
represents a definite transformation of energy. A stimulus
is transmitted along the branches of a neurone, and across
the gaps that separate it from other neurones. The neces-
sary energy must be supplied by the oxidation of carbon
in the nerve cell proper. Active thought means increased
blood pressure and temperature on the surface of the brain.
Thus all mental processes may be considered as joint
operations, between the thinker who initiates or controls
the train of thought, and the Universe whose forces make
such activity possible.
Our mental life may be passive as well as active, in-
volving no conscious effort and no noticeable increase in
blood pressure. In fact, by far the larger part of it is of
this character. Probably the neurones of the brain cortex
are in a state of incessant activity, even during the hours
of sleep. They are constantly transforming energy and
transmitting stimuli. Just what proportion of the result-
ing thought product is contributed respectively by God
and by man, we do not know. It is clear that man, in
his thought life, whether active or passive, is intimately
dependent on the Universe. But while much of his think-
ing appears to be done for him, in the subconscious opera-
tions of the brain, the man himself, in his conscious per-
sonality, makes a definite contribution to the final result.
Every person engaged in literature or research learns
•Albion W. Small, Am, J. of Sooiol., 2, 840, 1897.
BUILDING THE WORLD OF THOUGHT 81
to distinguish these two kinds of mental operations. Dur-
ing his waking hours, he is conscious of having certain
experiences, of talking with other men, of reading printed
pages, of making definite experiments, of wrestling with
problems of thought or expression. But all this time, be-
neath the threshold of consciousness, another stream of
mental life is flowing. It is fed bj his conscious thinking
and experience, charged with images, ideas, impressions.
The subconscious life, while preserving these intact as
memories (or whatever lies at the basis of memory), also
digests and develops them. And from this second stream
of mental activity, as from a subterranean river, thoughts
keep rising into consciousness. They may be mere feelings
and prejudices. They may be remembered scenes or words.
Sometimes the resurgence takes the form of matured
ideas or new forms of phrasing. In my own experience, I
wrestle for days over a problem, or leave a piece of work
half finished and unsatisfying. After retiring for the
night, or in the morning when only half awake, the prob-
lem is solved for me, the troublesome paragraph started
with one or two telling sentences. The inspiration may
come in the day time — when walking along the street,
listening to a sermon, busy with mechanical tasks, work-
ing in my study on an entirely different subject. All my
writing, when thoughts flow freely, seems like the work
of an amanuensis, putting on paper the ideas that crowd
up from the "undermind."
Probably all intuition and inspiration, in religion or
literature, in science or practical affairs, is of this charac-
ter. Literary history furnishes some extreme cases. Many
of my readers are doubtless familiar with the story of Julia
Ward Howe's Battle Hymn of the Republic. The visit to
the Virginia battle-fields late in JsTovember, 1861. The
singing of "John Brown's Body" on the slow drive home.
James Freeman Clarke's suggestion that she write new
words to that good air. Waking in the gray dawn of the
following morning, the lines of the Battle Hymn formed
82 CHAOS OK COSMOS?
themselves in her mind. Fearful lest she should forget
them she seized pen and paper, and scrawled the words
almost without seeing what she did. When Mrs. Howe
rose at daylight and dressed herself, she had no recollection
of what had passed. Seeing some writing on the tahle
she took it up, and recognized the words of her own poem :
"Mine eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the
Lord." 3
Elliot has called attention to Herhert Spencer's "extraor-
dinary power to see the essential elements in any hetero-
geneous mixture of events. He carved out a principle,
which immediately introduced order and method, where
previously there had heen nothing but a hopeless jumble.
. . . His methods of thinking and writing were wholly
conformable with his character. He no more thought of
sitting down to think than he thought of sitting down
to read. In the course of promiscuous idling he would
come across some significant fact or idea, which very
likely he would temporarily forget. But later on it would
be liable to turn up in his mind again, well on the way to
being a full-fledged principle. And once the principle got
rooted, relevant facts would come flying from all quar-
ters, until on all that subject quite a considerable amount
of knowledge had been more or less unintentionally accu-
mulated. These processes apparently occurred with spe-
cial strength while taking walks : on these occasions he was
often absent-minded and noticed little of what was going
on about him. He had of course immense natural con;
centration, but it was never brought on by an effort of
will. His method of writing was of the same kind. The
written matter flowed naturally from him, without con-
scious effort, and it was very little revised after being
written. Unlike John Stuart Mill, who wrote out his
* Bookman, 32, 306, 1910. Francis Colton's version, also from
Mrs. Howe herself, adds some interesting particulars; Current Lit.,
49, 677, 1910.
BUILDINa THE WORLD OF THOUGHT 83
Logic many times before he was satisfied with it, Spencer
never re-wrote." ^
Mill's method of work is far more common. I have
cited these exaggerated cases, because they bring out a
process that is going on to some extent in all mental
activity. The success of the thinker depends on his main-
taining right relations between the conscious and the sub-
conscious. To neglect or starve the subconscious leads to
mental sterility. At the other extreme, the failure to
control one's intuitions means weak or illogical generaliza-
tion, somewhat parallel with the unchecked freedom of the
subconscious in our dreams.
In successful thinking, the conscious personality does
three principal things. In the first place it feeds the sub-
conscious, by wide observation or reading. Mrs. Howe's
poem grew out of long study of the best literary forms, and
the brooding of a great personality over the crisis of her
nation. Spencer's general laws came from a mind packed
with miscellaneous information. Inspiration on a prob-
lem comes only after a period of hard study on that prob-
lem. Secondly, subconscious operations, to be fruitful,
require the constant practice of similar conscious opera-
tions. The Battle Hymn resulted from the writing of
many previous poems. Spencer's particular line of work
had become an inveterate habit, which enlarged our knowl-
edge in various fields. The third function of conscious-
ness is definite control. ITew ideas are likely to spring up
capriciously and without effort. To utilize an idea, how-
ever, to develop and phrase it properly, ordinarily re-
quires the focussing of attention on that idea to the exclu-
sion of everything else. Long practice makes it possible
even to regulate the flow of ideas, so that the subcon-
scious may be trained to work for us along one consciously
chosen line. Mental enrichment, practice and concen-
tration are the conditions of good thinking, and the at-
*Hugh S. R. Elliot, Herhert Spenoer, 1917, 62.
84 CHAOS OR COSMOS?
taininent of these three things should be the goal of all
education. Whether subconscious ideas are at times in-
spired directly by the God who is back of all the opera-
tions of the Universe, it is impossible to prove or disprove.
The religious attitude of calmness and confidence, however,
is conducive to the best thinking.
The constructive work of the human mind is shown
most clearly in the field of Art. All aesthetic pleasure has
a physical basis. Light waves of different lengths give
rise to the sensations of color. And colors and their com-
binations have a varying emotional accompaniment. The
pleasurable sensations of tone and overtone are due to the
primary and secondary vibrations produced in the air by a
sonorous body. A combination of tones is more enjoyable
when the vibrations are in a certain ratio, as in the 1 to
2 of the octave, or the 3 to 4 of the fourth. The pleasure
in bodily or vocal rhythm is largely muscular in origin.
It is probable that line drawing and symmetrical arrange-
ment bring a similar bodily reaction, what Grosse calls
"sympathetic reproduction." As man lived his life, and
found his varied activities bringing him these pleasurable
sensations, he came to reproduce them for their own sake.
He developed art, in order to objectify his emotion and
express it to his fellows.^ We see the beginning of the
process in the rhythm of savage dances and songs. Through
the manipulation of line and color, men were able to make
pictures, as on the cave walls of prehistoric France, that
would inspire definite suggestions and emotions. Still
later came the use of simple tone combinations in crude
musical instruments, recitative, and choral singing.
All art is social in origin and in expression. Histor-
ically man does not find beauty in the sounds or objects
of the world around him. He makes satisfying tones or
pictures, and later begins to apply his idea of beauty to
!N'ature itself. The beauty is not, as with Hegel, an expres-
sion of the Absolute Thought in the concrete facts of the
•Y. Hirn, Origins of Art, 1900, 301.
BUILDING THE WORLD OF THOUGHT 85
world. It is rather a mental synthesis by the individual
man, the product of his creative imagination. What we
shall call beautiful is a social standard, determined by the
taste of the group to which we belong.^ The modem artist
uses the same physical media as the savage, and for the
same end. He seeks to give his artistic feelings an outlet,
in a form that may be shared by others. He expresses
emotion in the art language, and by the alphabet of signs,
which the world has learned to read. With the growth
of knowledge and taste, the improvements in mechanism
and technique, man's creative power has attained a new
perfection of harmony in tone or color or form, a fulness of
emotional expression.
The artist differs from the average man in degree rather
than in kind. We see a strong emotional temperament,
and an unusual power of imagination, whether auditory,
visual, or motor. Acquaintance with standard forms
strengthens this primary endowment. Practice brings the
artist his power of concentration. His mind is constantly
creating, even when the creation is subconscious. Mozart's
trained faculty enabled him to think in terms of musical
compositions. The quintette in the Magic Flute is said
to have come to him while playing a game of billiards.
Croce tells us how "Leonardo shocked the prior of the con-
vent delle Grazie by standing for days together opposite
the ^Last Supper' without touching it with his brush. He
remarked of this attitude ^that men of the most lofty genius,
when they are doing the least work, are then the most
active, seeking invention with their minds.' The painter
is a painter, because he sees what others only feel or catch
a glimpse of, but do not see." "^ But all appreciation of
music or painting is essentially creative. The power vested
in trained minds makes it possible for them to reproduce
the synthesis first given by the artistic genius.
•James H. Tufts, Genesis of Aesthetic Categories, Univ. of Chi-
cago Pub's, 1903, vol. 3.
'B. Croce, Theory of Aesthetic, Eng. trans., 1909, 16.
86 CHAOS OE COSMOS?
I have tried in this and the preceding chapter to steer a
safe course between the various psychological schools. Our
real interest has been in the product of thought, rather
than the process. Whatever particular theories we may
hold as to the conscious and the subconscious mental life,
two facts stand out in clear relief. The first is contingency.
The second is the power of independent creation. The
philosopher in his study, the business man in his office, the
workman at his lathe, the surgeon at the operating table,
the artist, the musician — all are absolutely dependent on
God. Apart from the Universe itself, without the energy
exchanges in the brain cells, the nerve reactions, and per-
haps the direct inspiration, their work would be impossible.
But their work does change the result. Men are able to
control their mental resources. By making and utilizing
ideas and laws, they add something that was not on the
earth before. They make man's adjustment more com-
plete, his life more satisfying. A writer in Science
Progress has branded as intellectual criminals "those who
remain ignorant when they should learn, thoughtless when
they should think, and sunk in superstitions when they
should reason." ^ If Julia Ward Howe and Herbert Spen-
cer and Da Vinci and Mozart had not lived, if they had
developed lesser personalities, or failed to train their
powers and use them to the full, the modem world would
lose a heritage of patriotism and truth and beauty.
•11, 136, 1916.
IX.
COMPLETING THE PHYSICAI. WORLD.
To a certain extent the physical Universe is complete.
Its laws do not change. The action of forces is definite,
uniform, predictable. Two separated bodies always tend
to gravitate together. Everywhere light travels in a
vacuum a certain number of miles a second. The same
number of electrons, grouped in the same way about a
nucleus of positive electricity, show the properties of an
atom of oxygen. Why natural forces should act in this
way and not otherwise, we do not know. "I accept the
Universe," said Margaret Fuller. There is no alternative.
The world of ^N'ature being arranged in a particular way,
our first duty is one of adaptation. Whether the present
order is due to design, or whether organisms are fitted to
the earth because they have developed in response to its
conditions, this planet is a good place for man to live. He
needs only to know his environment and adjust himself to
it And such honest, faithful, courageous adjustment is a
cooperation of man with the Universe.
The uniformity of action in this sphere is of immense
advantaga In fact, our life would be impossible on any
other basis. How long could we exist in a world of dis-
order, where the succession of the seasons could not be pre-
dicted, where combustion was really spontaneous instead of
following fixed laws, where sometimes chemical elements
would combine, and at other times, under exactly the same
conditions, combination failed ? Such a world might suit
the savage, but for civilized man it would be a bad dream ;
it could not be a reality.
87
88 CHAOS OR COSMOS?
As Koosevelt has said, the forces of ITature do not
threaten ; they operate. It is no ground for complaint that
fire bums and cold freezes. Those who live in an earth-
quake belt, must expect occasional earthquakes. Those
who live where cyclones occur, accept the risk of having
property and perhaps life destroyed by this means. If a
man builds his home at the foot of a live volcano, and the
volcano erupts and buries the man and his family under a
mass of lava, the man is responsible, not the Universe. In
any part of the world, the rainfall or snowfall, the alterna-
tions of heat or cold, while varying from year to year,
vary only within definite limits. Those who do not like
that average rainfall or that temperature range, are free
to move elsewhere. We witness many such hegiras, espe-
cially among the well-to-do. But in history the average
family, instead of fleeing from conditions, has adapted it-
self to them. Through the use of fire and clothing, pre-
historic man was able to leave the tropics and follow the
receding glaciers, like the animals that he hunted. Emi-
gration, after filling the more, fertile areas of the tem-
perate zone, has swept on into less favored regions. Men
have learned to wrest a living from apparently barren soil,
and even to irrigate the desert. Famine and disaster have
taken an awful toll. But the conquest of the earth through
adaptation, has trained the race in courage, in endurance,
in resourcefulness, in thrift. I have seen this process at
first hand, both among the 'New England hills and on one
of the last timber frontiers of the West. The virility of
the American is still the virility of the pioneer and his
descendants. The strongest of our immigrants are those
who in the Old World wrestled with I^ature as Jacob
wrestled with God for His blessing. That Man has suc-
ceeded in his adjustment to the Universe, is shown by the
vastness of the earth's present population, and its spread
from the Equator to the Arctic circles.
But Man has not merely adapted himself to the earth as
he finds it His mental equipment has enabled him to de-
COMPLETING THE PHYSICAL WORLD 89
velop and complete the earth. He has shared the Divine
task of physical creation. The first tools and weapons were
levers with which to move the world, and provide a richer
and more dependable livelihood. The economic evolution
of primitive man is one of the most fascinating stories
in the history of the race. Invention and accumulation
make for the advance of certain tribes, only to be wiped
out again by disease or war. After many thousand years, a
definite advance is registered in the domestication of the
cow and the sheep, the development of agriculture, such
arts as pottery and weaving. Weapons and tools are im-
proved. Mines and factories are opened, for working flint
and other valued articles. Houses become more elaborate.
Such engineering feats are attempted as the circle of Stone-
henge. As population grows denser, Man^s creative adjust-
ment to the physical world, always social in its character,
becomes more highly organized. Bronze implements are
introduced, to a civilization already well under way. Min-
ing and manufacturing bring specialization ; men begin to
follow distinct trades. Commerce increases. Cities spring
up. Then iron, and steel ; the rest of the story is recorded
history.
Men find themselves on an island, separated from the
mainland by broad rivers. They learn to cross these by
canoes, by ferry boats. Then they throw bridges over
them; they tunnel beneath their surface. They cross
oceans in ships, driven first by wind power and later by
steam. Trails give place to roads, and these to cemented
highways. Men lay rails across a continent for steam and
electric traffic, filling valleys and boring through moun-
tains. They flash messages around the world by wires,
and even without wires. They learn to navigate under the
water and through the air. They build structures of many
stories, to which they are lifted swiftly against the force
of gravity. They harness the energy stored in water-
falls and coal, in molecules and electrons, and use it to
heat and light their houses and turn the wheels in their
90 CHAOS OE COSMOS?
factories. Whatever articles are needed to supply their
wants, tools are ready, and tools to make tools. What hath
Man wrought, in this last hundred years. Human achieve-
ment in the completion of the physical world, is an epic,
far grander and worthier than the deeds of Homeric heroes
or mediaeval knights. And the work of creation goes for-
ward, at an ever accelerating rate.
Man has succeeded, not in spite of IN'ature, but because
of ISTature. The forces of the physical world were on his
side. They have been friendly, not hostile. Man has been
able to work with the Universe, because the Universe ever
was working with man. The material and power are sup-
plied him ; what he contributes is their knowledge and con-
trol. Through the oxidation of wood or coal, for example,
people develop heat for their comfort or convenience. The
laws of Physics and Chemistry are not broken. The
equations of energy are unaltered. Man brings together
forces and force-centers that existed previously. But he
brings them together in new arrangements, and for the
accomplishment of new ends.
Every workman is a creator, helping to direct Divine
forces, working with God upon Divine materials. The
miner, digging coal or iron, is following a holy calling.
Every stroke of his pick is an act of unconscious com-
munion with the Universe. His task is sacred, it is part
of the social order. The comfort, the very life of God's
children, depends on the product of his labor. To shirk
is to prove traitor to man and to God. To do one's best
is to hear, if one will, the "Well done, good and faithful
servant." So with the laborer in the blast furnace, turn-
ing out steel for human use. The mechanic, making what
God wants made. The worker in the building trades, help-
ing to house man and his varied industries. The ship-
builder, the boilermaker, doing their part in the organiza-
tion which make human commerce possible. The engineer
or the seaman, making commerce actual. The farmer,
feeding the world, of whom our next chapter will have
COMPLETING THE PHYSICAL WOELD 91
more to tell. The miller, putting the farmer's product into
available form. The tradesman and his varied helpers, dis-
tributing the goods that people need. The housewife, pre-
paring what her home should have of food and cleanliness
and comfort. There are no secular callings. Steam and
electricity are holy, and boiler plates and bolts of cloth and
shoes and sacks of flour and dressed meats and dishes and
laundered clothes. To come in contact with the objects and
forces of the world of every day, is to come in contact with
God in His incessant activity. The place whereon we
stand, in factory or store or kitchen, is holy ground.
From a feudal aristocracy we have inherited the idea of
a certain stigma attaching to hand labor. Such an attitude
is virtual atheism. In itself hand labor is not degrading
but ennobling. It should be practiced in our leisure hours
and taught to our children. The mere contact with physi-
cal materials brings a satisfaction and a peace which are
in the truest sense religious. Athletic sports are of the
greatest importance, from the standpoint of health and rec-
reation. But in the education of a people, sport cannot
take the place of honest work. There can be no real democ-
racy without a general participation in physical labor, as
something honorable and intrinsically rewarding. Bul-
garia, under Premier Stamboliisky, has introduced the
plan of drafting young men, when they reach the age of
conscription, for a period of education and service as
laborers rather than soldiers.
William Morris defined real art as the expression by
man of his pleasure in labor. He might have said the
same of true religion. In useful work well done are all
the elements of communion and worship and service. Cre-
ative tasks, when seen in a larger perspective, bring a cer-
tain self-forgetfulness. We have an example of this in
the almost superhuman effort that can be made under stress
of some great cause, as in making munitions or digging
trenches. Absorption in some piece of creative work may
bring the same oblivion to time and weariness and bodily
92 CHAOS OR COSMOS?
need. Sometliing of the same attitude is possible in normal
labor. Outside of muscular fatigue, what tires us is not
the work we are doing, but tbe work we are not doing.
Our mind is constantly chafing to be doing something else.
On the other hand, work that is interesting is seldom tir-
ing. In this case we are truly cooperating with God. Our
mind is working in harmony with the Divine processes
that go on in brain, nerve and muscle cells.
That religion in its broadest sense will ever become a
general and sufficient motive for labor, is open to question.
The chief compulsion has been and will continue to be
economic necessity. But the sense of cooperation with the
Universe for social ends may be made a supplementary
motive, dignifying mechanical tasks, giving a new sacred-
ness to materials, glorifying routine through the conscious-
ness of the end to be attained, developing the satisfaction
of craftsmanship.
To release this powerful supplementary motive in me-
dianical labor, many things are necessary. Hours of labor
must be reduced below the point of physical exhaustion,
and the fatigue due to monotony or nervous strain relieved
by change of work or periods of rest. Proper provision
must be made for lighting, ventilation, safety and comfort.
The return in wages must not only provide a decent living,
but be fairly representative of the worker's share in pro-
duction. There must be security of tenure; the worker
cannot be haunted by the fear of losing his job, or of be-
coming dependent in old age. Some means must be de-
vised for giving an intelligent interest in the processes
and management of the plant. Home conditions and the
opportunity for wholesome recreation are of almost equal
importance. And the worker must have the skill, the con-
trol over his own powers and over natural forces, the use
of the best labor-saving machinery available, and the eco-
nomical placing of materials and tools, which will make
for the most efficient production. On no other terms can
the workman have the consciousness of being a creator
COMPLETING THE PHYSICAL WOELD 93
rather than a drudge. Some of these conditions society at
large is securing, through legislative enactment. Still
more powerful is the recognition by the more progressive
plants of the human factor in industry.-^ Booker Washing-
ton, in one of his books, pleads for the industrial educa-
tion which will "teach the Wegro how not to drudge in his
work." He contrasts "the S'egro in the South toiling
through a field of oats with an old-fashioned reaper, vdth
the white man on a modem farm in the West, sitting upon
a modern Taarvester,' behind two spirited horses, with an
umbrella over him, using a machine that cuts and binds
the oats at the same time, — doing four times as much work
as the black man with one-half the labor." ^
Under any approach to ideal conditions, physical labor,
like virtue, is its own reward. It brings returns which
cannot be reckoned in dollars. "The real wages of life,"
says Atkins, "are in the strength which attends happy
toil, in the comradeship born of a common endeavor for
great ends — there is no finer friendship than the friend-
ship of those who work together — in the sense of
usefulness which attends all service and in the joy of
creation which God shares with all good workmen.
We are paid for our work in the happiness and well-
being of others, in wholesome weariness which makes rest
a blessing, in the hunger which gives a flavor to bread and
the thirst which makes a cup of cold water the very gift
of God. Discipline and skill, patience and power are coin
struck from a mint whose gold is never tarnished — these
also are the wages of toil, and beyond all these is charac-
ter — the continuation and revelation of the great reward
of labor in personality itself." ^
The relations between Man and the Universe must be
*This subject will be taken up more fully in Chapters 18 and 19.
See Frederick S. Lee, The Human Machine and Industrial Ef-
ficiency, 1918; Josephine Goldmark, Fatigue and Efficiency, 1912;
Frank B. and Lillian M. Gilbreth, Fatigue Study, 2nd ed., 1919.
^Future of the Am. Negro, 1899, 62.
•G. G. Atkins, Congregationaliat, Dec. 25, 1919.
94 CHAOS OK COSMOS?
learned, not through an abstract discussion of the nature
of human consciousness, or of freedom versus determinism,
but through a study of the difference which the individual
man is able to make in the net result. That he is not a
mere cog in the cosmic machine is shown by the reverse
fact, that man may refuse to cooperate in the work of cre-
ation, or even destroy that which has been created by others.
He may set fire to a building, or dynamite a printing of-
fice or a mine. He may limit production by unscientific or
inhuman management, or by sabotage or a policy of "ca*
canny." He may live in idleness on the productive work of
others. He may hold land or water-power or mineral
deposits undeveloped, in order to secure a larger unearned
increment. He may plunge the world in a war that wastes
more life and property than can be replaced in a genera-
tion. For such antics the theory of the Absolute offers
no explanation. But both creation and destruction fit into
the idea of a Universe which, since the emergence of the
human species, has become a Pluralism rather than a
Monism, a Democracy rather than an Absolute Monarchy.
DEVELOPING THE FOOD SUPPLY.
What Man has done to perfect the organic world, will
be seen if we trace the pedigree of some of the commonest
articles on our table. I do not intend in this chapter to
give practical directions for farming, but merely to review
some examples of human creation and control which are
no less remarkable because the end-products are so fa-
miliar.
We may begin with the meat and dairy products. Man's
domestication of wild cattle in I^eolithic times did much
to change the course of social evolution. Wealth came to
be '^pecuniary," as with the early Latin, derived from
pecus, cattle. By 3000 B. C. the Egyptians had not only
developed a hornless from a horned breed, but had achieved
a selective milk type.^
If it is the beefsteak we are considering, the story is
probably that of the Shorthorn breed. It goes back to
the valley of the Tees, in the English county of Durham,
and the September day, in the year 1786, when Charles
Colling of Ketton Hall made his historic visit to the home
of his friend Maynard of Eryholme. As he and his wife
rode up, their attention was at once attracted by a hand-
some roan cow which Miss Maynard was milking. Be-
fore the visit was over, this animal, a fine representative
of the old Teesdale stock, was purchased for 28 guineas
and renamed Lady Maynard, or, as an admiring country-
side came to call her, "the beautiful Lady Maynard." She
was destined to become the ancestress of the improved
* Jas. O. Breasted, 8ci. Monthly, 9, 422, 1919.
95
96 CHAOS OK COSMOS?
Shorthorns. Still more important was the blood of a bull,
bought by Charles Colling for 10 guineas, and sold after
two years for 8 on account of his small size. He had no
name until his progeny began to attract attention, when he
was named Hubback, from a later owner. This bull of
posthumous fame showed symmetry and even distribution
of flesh, and a remarkably quick response to feeding. The
union of these two strains, under the method of close in-
breeding which Colling had learned from the great pioneer,
Kobert Bakewell of Dishley, produced the beef type he
was seeking. Such bulls as Favorite, his grandson Comet,
which sold afterward for $5000, and "the Durham Ox,"
which reached a weight of nearly 3400 pounds, made the
improved breed famous throughout England. Still fur-
ther developed by his brother Eobert Colling, and by
Thomas Booth and Thomas Bates, the Shorthorns or Dur-
hams began to make their way to America, where they
were to prove the favorite dual purpose breed. The fas-
cinating and at times sensational story should be read in
the pages of Mr. Alvin Sanders.^
Man has produced equally striking results with dairy
cattle. In 1910 the average annual production of the
American dairy cow was estimated by the Bureau of Ani-
mal Industry at 4000 pounds of milk, and 160 pounds of
butter fat. Probably a quarter of the cows did not pay
for the cost of keeping them, and nearly one-fourth more
failed to yield a profit. To correct this situation, three
lines of improvement are being followed: feeding, selec-
tion, and breeding. Experiments in Iowa showed that
good feeding, as contrasted with poor feeding, more than
doubled the total yield of young stock over a two-year
period. The aim in scientific feeding is to supply each
cow with the largest amount of grain she can use in milk
production without putting on flesh. The rough and ready
rule is to feed one pound of grain for every three pounds
* Shorthorn Cattle, 2nd ed., 1901; At the Sign of the Stock Yard
Inn, 1915.
DEVELOPING THE FOOD SUPPLY 97
of milk produced, in addition to all tlie roughage the cow
will eat up clean. Warmth, ventilation and general peace
and contentment are also of great importance. Since
individual cows vary greatly in their capacity for utiliz-
ing food above their maintenance, regular testing is neces-
sary in order to weed out the less productive stock. At
the Georgia Experiment Station, the best cow in the herd
gave during twelve months 7,968 pounds of milk, which
produced $115.44 of butter. The poorest cow gave only
2,788 pounds of milk, with a butter value of $41.63. Be-
sides selecting individuals with the best production records,
much can be accomplished by breeding up the herd. Let
me refer again to experiments in Iowa. The introduction
of pure-bred Holstein sires brought an increased produc-
tion in the heifers, at an average age of three years and a
half, over their scrub mothers at an average age of six
years, of 71% in milk, and 42% in butterfat.^
While the production by good grade herds compares
favorably with herds made up entirely of thoroughbreds,
the possibilities in breeding can be seen from the world
records made by pure-bred cattle. The Holstein cow Segis
Pietertje Prospect, recently completed a year's production
which showed 37,381.4 pounds of milk, or an average of
about 60 quarts a day. At least six cows have passed the
30,000 mark. The butterfat record for this breed is held
by a Canadian cow which rejoices in the name of Bella
Pontiac, with 1,270 lbs., which is reckoned as 1,587.5
lbs. butter. For the Guernseys, Mume Cowan gave 24,008
lbs. milk, and Countess Prue 1,103.28 lbs. butterfat. The
Ayrshire, Garclaugh May Mischief, produced 25,329 lbs.
milk; and Lily of Willowmoor 955.56 lbs. butterfat. The
Jersey records are held by Passport, with 19,694.8 lbs.
milk; and Plain Mary with 1,040 lbs. butterfat.* Man
•Iowa Agric. Exp. Sta., Bull. 165, 1916; Clarence B. Lane, Records
of Dairy Cows, U. S. Dept. Agr., Bur. An. Industry, Bull. 75, 1905.
* Breeds of Dairy Cattle, U. S. D. A., Farmers Bulletin 893, 1917,
records corrected to Dec. 1, 1921. The Holstein milk record has
been broken twice within two years.
98 CHAOS OE COSMOS?
has gone far in perfecting the cow as a machine for turn-
ing concentrated food materials into milk and fat. Breed-
ing and feeding have produced similar records for hogs
and poultry.
Normal milk contains various types of bacteria, one
of which, the lactis acidi, causes fermentation with the
mild acid flavor that we enjoy in our butter. In order to
provide this uniform flavor, the butter-maker has pas-
teurized his cream to destroy the active bacteria of all
sorts. He then adds a pure culture of the lactis acidi, al-
lows the cream to ferment under its influence, churns it,
works out the surplus water, salts and colors it to suit our
taste, and the butter is kept at a low temperature until it
is ready for the table. The creation of our cheese is some-
what more complicated. The cheese-maker is unable, in
most cases, to make use of pasteurization, but he secures
the desired fermentation by selecting whole milk in which
lactis acidi predominate, and adding a pure culture. Ren-
nin, extracted from the digestive stomach of a calf, is then
introduced, to assist by its enzymes the digestion of the
curd. The resulting flavor is due to some biologic action,
not yet understood, but stimulated by the acids of fermen-
tation, which are under definite control, and by the salt
which is added. By changing the method of production,
in some cases adding cultures of certain molds, the cheese-
maker is able to vary the flavor and consistency, and pro-
duce over four hundred varieties.^
Our honey is a plant secretion, whose cane sugar is
changed to grape sugar in the bee's body. Its flavor is
determined by the flowers on whicTi the bees forage. The
aim of the bee-keeper has been to increase production.
The Italian species is most generally used, owing to their
comparative gentleness and disease-resistance, and the in-
creased laying power of the queen. As all worker eggs
■E. G. Hastings, in Marshall's Microbiology, 1917, 408-437; C. F.
Doane and H. W. Lawson, Varieties of Cheese, Bur. Animal Ind.,
Bun, 105, 1908.
DEYELOPING THE FOOD SUPPLY 99
are laid by the queen, and the life of the worker bee during
the active season is not more than five or six weeks, all that
is necessary for changing the breed is to secure a pure-bred
Italian queen, which may be sent long distances by mail.
The increase of honey production is secured through me-
chanical devices and manipulation. A hive is constructed
with movable frames, on which are stretched sheets of wax
foundation, stamped so as to furnish the bees with the six-
sided bases of the proper size for building worker cells.
The objective in modem bee-keeping is the strongest pos-
sible colony at the time of the main honey flow. Colonies
of 100,000 bees are not unusual. To secure this, it is
necessary to eliminate swarming. Instead of allowing the
bees to waste their energy building up new colonies, man
keeps them at work strengthening the main colony and
gathering supplies. By the use of these methods, I have
been able to secure an average surplus of 100 pounds of
extracted honey per colony in a normal season. A yield of
200 pounds is common, and over 400 pounds has occa-
sionally been realized as an average. Millions of tons of
nectar go to waste annually, through the lack of honey bees
to harvest it, under man's control. That such control is
still inadequate, is shown by the fact that the average
yield per colony in the United States is only 45 pounds of
honey. Most of the smaller apiaries fall very much below
this figure.
Our wheaten bread, if made from Minneapolis flour,
has been ground from hard spring wheat, grown in the
Red River valley. And thereby hangs an interesting tale
of plant breeding. This most important of all cereal crops
has been cultivated throughout historic times. The plant
is in general self -fertilizing, allowing for the selection of
pure lines by pedigree culture. W. M. Hays, of the Min-
nesota Experiment Station, began in 1888 to try out strains
of wheat gathered from the United States and foreign
countries. The Blue Stem and Bed Fife, which had be*
come indigenous to Minnesota were found most satisfac-
100 CHAOS OE COSMOS?
tory. In ten years' time, out of 552 wheats grown in trial
plots, often from a single kernel, four hardy varieties had
been secured, with a high gluten content and an average
yield of 22.5 bushels per acre. At that time the producing
capacity for the country as a whole was about 17 bushels.
But the experimenter was not yet satisfied. From the best
types already secured, 400 grains of wheat were planted
in single hills in 1892, and a new series of 31 varieties
secured. By 1894 about a pint of seed was available for
each of these. At the end of the decade, the best of the new
varieties, Minnesota 163 and 169, were beginning to be
supplied to farmers. Their yield was approximately 28
bushels, making possible an increase of over 10 bushels per
acre for the entire I^orthwest.^
The maize which enters our diet, directly or indirectly,
differs from wheat in that it is normally cross-fertilized.
At the Connecticut Experiment Station, D. F. Jones, con-
tinuing the work begun by East, has been able to isolate
about a dozen pure lines. These in themselves lack vigor,
but may be crossed to furnish new combinations of desir-
able qualities. The greatest success has been reached with
a double cross. Mr. Jones showed me the small shrivelled
ears of two strains of white dent com, and the cross made
of these, somewhat larger but still shrivelled. By com-
bining with a similar cross of yellow dent strains, he se-
cured a large perfect ear, which in the trial plots yielded
an average of 112 bushels of shelled com. The average
yield on Connecticut farms, the highest in the country, is
44 bushels, the best farmers reaching about 75. The best
record of the hybrid varieties used in the trial plots was
92 bushels. The 20% increase of the new combination
was due to the elimination of bad heredity. Each plant
produced an ear of corn, and this ear was perfect, ensur-
ing a uniform production of grain. To take advantage of
the new method, it will be necessary for the farmer to
maintain special seed plots, securing a small quantity of
• Univ. of Minn. Ag. Exper. Station, Bull 62, 1899.
DEVELOPING THE FOOD StPFL*' ' *' * 101
seed from the two crosses, and planting in alternate rows.
By detasseling the first row, its matured ears, fertilized by
the second row, will be the desired double cross. This will
furnish seed for the next year's planting,*^
The same patient, enterprising cooperation with the
Universe is seen in the adaptation and improvement of
plants from distant countries, like the potato and the to-
mato, the navel orange, and countless garden flowers; in
the grafting of improved varieties of fruit on old stocks;
in the creation of new species, like the thomless edible
cactus, which cost Burbank ten years of crossing and
selection.®
In providing these various articles of food, Man has
been actively engaged in improving the soil from which
they come. In recent years his aim has been to make the
fullest possible use of the microorganisms which are the
chief factor in soil fertility. Some of these bacteria take
up free nitrogen, and render it available for plant food.
The most useful are those that attach themselves to the
roots of clover and other legumes. By growing clover as
part of the crop rotation, the nitrogen content of the soil
is not only maintained but increased. Where necessary
the clover seed is innoculated before planting, and lime
added to the soil to stimulate bacterial action.
Other bacteria and molds decompose animal waste and
dead organic matter, and thus make it again fitted for the
use of plants. Careful treatment of liquid and solid ma-
nure enables this process to go on with the least possible
loss. The application of manure, or the plowing under of
green crops, supplies the soil bacteria with the food sup-
ply on which to continue their decomposition of the humus.
Cultivation and drainage insure the amounts of moisture
*The reader is referred to Mr. Jones' report and bibliography in
J. of the Am. 8oc. of Agronomy, 12, 77, 1920.
'W. S. Harwood, New Creations in Plant Life, 1905, gives a
popular review of Burbank's work. For a general review of the
subject, see Babcock and Claussen, Genetics in Agricultttre, 1918,
with full bibliography.
io3 ' *''* *^' ^ ' "'chaos oe cosmos ?
and oxygen that are necessary for tlie greatest activity of
the bacteria, as well as of the plant roots, in various soils.
Still other microorganisms act, either directly or indirectly,
to break up rock surfaces for the formation of new soil.
They also transform various mineral compounds, supply-
ing, for example, most of the potash needed for rapid
plant growth. This most useful work is stimulated by the
application of animal or green manures or commercial
fertilizers.^
Through this active and intelligent control of bacterial
action, Man has been able to restore the fertility of worn-
out soils, to utilize apparently barren regions for crop pro-
duction, and to increase soil-fertility, in spite of the
amount of food material annually drawn from the land.
'New areas are constantly being made available for farm-
ing. The United States Eeclamation Service has provided
water for approximately 3 million acres of arid land. The
general campaign for surface and tile drainage is beginning
to reclaim the 80 to 100 million acres too wet for culti-
vation. Similar movements are going on in other parts of
the world. As a consequence, the predictions of earlier
economists are reversed, and Man appears to be increasing
his food supply faster than the population increases. The
species which can achieve such a result is not composed of
automatons.
Professor Bailey, in his inspiring book on the Holy
Earth, distinguishes three stages in our relation to the
planet. The collecting stage of the hunter and fisherman
is succeeding by the mining stage. The wealth of the
earth is exploited without thought for future generations.
There is no attempt to clean up the refuse heaps and heal
the scars, and thus restore man's home to its pristine order
and beauty. No one who looks on hillsides devastated by
wasteful lumbering, would consider man a good house-
keeper. "Farming has been very much a mining pro-
•MarshalFs Micyrobiology, 1917, 289-363; Chas. W. Burkett, SoiU^
1907.
DEVELOPING THE FOOD SUPPLY 103
cess, the utilizing of fertility easily at hand and the mov-
ing-on to lands unspoiled of quick potash and nitrogen."
Finally we enter the productive stage, where we secure
supplies by controlling the conditions of growth. The
American farmer is learning, like his brother in Europe,
to put back into the soil as much as he takes out of it.
Farming begins to have "a range of responsible and perma-
nent morals." ^^
One of the great social problems of our age is to insure
a succession of efficient and contented farmers. Owner-
ship versus tenantry, technical training, labor and labor-
saving machinery, proper marketing, adequate financial
returns, good roads, social advantages — all these enter into
the solution of the problem. But still more fundamental
is the question of inspiration and motive. Legally the
farmer may be the owner of his land. Morally he is a
trustee. He is engaged, as Bailey says, in a quasi-public
business. He is the agent of Society to subdue the surface
of the earth and increase its productiveness. And the daily
work on the farm represents what is perhaps our most in-
timate contact with God's activities in the world around
us. A man cannot be a good farmer unless he remembers
man and remembers God.^^
There is something inherently sacred in the earth which
is man's principal source of food, in the fructifying power
of moisture and sun, in the living organisms, lowlier mem-
bers of a common evolution, whose life man is able to con-
trol, and put to use for the supplying of his needs. It
is not surprising that people of an earlier culture wor-
shipped many of these objects as sources of fertility, or as
symbols of deity. The revival of Jesus' idea of God's ac-
tivity in ^Nature should provide an outlet for this natural
religious instinct, in terms that the modern world can
understand. God is no longer an Absentee Landlord. He
is our Partner in the great creative enterprise. The com-
«L. H. Bailey, The Holy Earth, 1915, 22.
"M, 32.
104 CHAOS OE COSMOS?
munion which the IN'ature-lover feels in flower and field and
wood, rises in the life of the gardener or farmer to the
height of definite cooperation. Food is essential to life.
Civilization depends upon adequate and increasing food
supply. Through the control of Divine forces of repro-
duction and growth, man works with God in this most
elemental of all services to the race. In the words of
IngersoU: "To plow is to pray; to plant is to prophesy;
and the harvest answers and fulfills."
XI.
THE CONTROL OF HEALTH
The life of any organism is contingent. It must adapt
itself to the environment. It must continue to fulfill the
conditions which make organic life possible. In the hu-
man species this adaptation is, to some extent, under con-
scious control. Successful adjustment to the Universe is
health. Failure in adjustment means pain, sickness, and
death. To charge suffering to God would be as absurd aa
to charge Him with the burning out of the fuse of the
electric lights, when my eldest son tried some scientific
experiments. If positive and negative wires are joined,
a short circuit results. If a man overeats, it is liable to
bring on an attack of biliousness. The Universe does not
cause the biliousness, any more than it caused the short cir-
cuit. It merely lays down the conditions of successful or
unsuccessful adjustment.
The question of Health brings into sharp relief the op-
posing theories of Monism and Pluralism which are before
us in this section of our book. In Christian Science and
similar pantheistic movements, the perfecting of the in-
dividual is practically his absorption in the Universe.
God is represented as Perfect Health. To abide in health
one must abide in God. Since God is also, for this school,
the Absolute Mind, health is primarily a matter of mental
harmony or discord. The aim of the healer is to exorcise
sickness, by bringing the patient into an attitude of con-
fidence, harmony and oneness with the Universe of which
he is a part.
105
106 CHAOS OR COSMOS?
In this position there is much of truth and practical
value, as we shall see. But a wider view of the field shows
that the correct adjustment of man to the Universe is not
merely mental. It is also structural, chemical and bac-
teriological. These factors are not mutually exclusive.
Rather they supplement and shade into each other. The
science of Medicine, in its four-fold aspect, is part of the
creative achievement of the human mind which we have al-
ready discussed. In this chapter we shall apply such
knowledge in some detail to the case of the individual man.
Christianity, like other religions, has made valuable use
of suggestion and faith. But the laws of health are laws
of God. To know these laws and follow them is as much
a religious duty as to follow the Ten Commandments. The
forces of the Universe that make for health are at our
command, but we are required to make active and intelli-
gent use of them. I^ot to call on the best medical skill
available, is to neglect some of the most notable coopera-
tion of man with God.-^
Since the human body is a physical machine, it is neces-
sary to keep that machine intact, and in proper working
order. Surgery attempts to correct man's adjustment on
the physical side, whenever this has been disturbed by acci-
dent or other cause. A man's hand was severed in our
local saw-mill, and hanging only by a piece of skin. Plac-
ing him under an anaesthetic, the surgeons in the hospital
*For any one who cares to follow further the subject of this
chapter, the number of good books is legion. I suggest the follow-
ing: John F. Binnie, Manual of Operative Surgery, 7th ed.,
1916; Russell Howard, Practice of Surgery, 2nd ed., 1918; Albert
P. Mathews, Physiolog. Chemistry, 2nd ed., 1916; Graham Lusk,
Science of Nutrition, 3rd ed., 1917; Wm. Osier, Principles and
Practice of Medicine, 8th ed., 1918; M. J. Rosenau, Preventive
Medicine and Hygiene, 2nd ed., 1916; Wm. Brady, Personal Health,
1916; Irving Fisher and Eugene L. Fisk, How to Live, 1915; Edwin
O. Jordan, General Bacteriology, 6th ed., 1918; Marshall's Microbi-
ology, 2n(i ed., 1917; Hans Zinsser, Infection and Resistance, 2nd
ed., 1918; Paul Dubois, Psychic Treatment of Nervous Disorders,
Eng. trans., 1907; Wm. A. White, Prin's of Mental Hygiene, 1917;
Hugo Miinsterberg, Psychotherapy^ 1909; Richard C. Cabot, What
Men Live By, 1914.
THE CONTROL OF HEALTH 107
set the bones, and rejoined the nerves and blood-vessels.
The natural forces of growth did the rest, and the man
regained almost complete use of his hand. Where a limb
cannot be saved, it is amputated, and the patient fitted with
an artificial leg or arm. A tumor or a diseased appendix,
which threaten the loss of life, may be removed. In the
case of serious burns, skin may be grafted from another
part of the body, or even from a different person. Sec-
tions of tissue and bone are transplanted. Transfusion of
blood is also practiced. Manipulation or massage may re-
store normal circulation in obstructed nerves or muscles.
The improvement of defective sight, or its compensation
by artificial lenses, relieves eye-strain and saves health and
efficiency. The science of Dentistry, supplementing proper
care of the teeth, enables us to keep this important part of
our anatomy functioning even to old age, and to avoid
the poisoning of the blood or of the food material which
results from decay. These are but samples of the repair
of man's physical machine which the advance of Science
has made possible. Passive absorption in the Absolute
Mind does not provide new teeth or remove adenoids or
restore severed hands. Surgery can only release the forces
of assimilation and growth through which God operates
in the physical organism. But man must do his part, on
pain of death.
That man's corrective task is far from complete was
shown by the examinations under the American army
draft. Of two and a half million men examined under
the first draft, 29 % were rejected as unfit for active mili-
tary service,^ and nearly 30% of the two succeeding
drafts. That is, practically a third of all American men
are physically abnormal. It is interesting to note the
classification made of nearly half a million disqualifica-
tions reported by local boards and camp surgeons.^
"Provost Marshall General, Fvrat Report , 1918, 44.
•Id., Second Report, 1919.
108 CHAOS OR COSMOS?
CAUSE FOR REJECTION NUMBER PER CENT
Total for all causes 467,694 100.00
Alcohol and drugs , 2,007 .43
Bones And joints 57,744 12.35
Physical under-development 39,166 8.37
Digestive system 2,476 .53
Ears 20,465 4.38
Eyes , 49,801 10.65
Flatfoot (pathological) 18,087 3.87
Genito-nrinary (venereal) 6,235 1.33
Genito-iirinary (non-venereal) . . 6,309 1.35
Heart and blood vessels 61,142 13.07
Hernia 28,268 6.04
Mental deficiency 24,514 5.24
Nervous and mental disorders 23,728 6.07
Eespiratory (tuberculous) 40,533 8.67
Kespiratory (non-tuberculous) . 7,823 1.67
Skin 12,519 2.68
Teeth 14,793 3.16
Thyroid 8,215 1.78
Tuberculosis, non-respiratory . . . — . 4,136 .88
The human body has its own power plant and its own
chemical laboratory. The latter produces the enzymes
needed for digesting and assimilating the different food
elements, and for oxidizing the blood and lymph which
are to replenish the energy of the various cells and carry
off the wasta Given a fair chance, the organism will
maintain its own chemical and thermal equilibrium. Air,
food and water, exercise and sleep of the proper quality
and amount, cleanliness, and the insulation of the body
through clothing or warmed air, are all that is necessary,
under normal conditions, to maintain perfect health. God
provides them all. Man needs only to find them and use
them, and the Divine forces in the organism will respond.
The human body is indeed a temple, more sacred than any
built with hands, where we may know the presence of the
Highest, and witness the constant miracle of God's ac-
THE CONTROL OP HEALTH 109
tivity. To be a faithful and worthy keeper of that temple
is the holiest of callings. Ordinary sickness is a punish-
ment for the sin of neglected duty.
At times, usually through some failure on man's part,
the chemical equilibrium of the body is disturbed. A
change in the amount or constitution of the food elements,
or in the substances naturally eliminated from the system,
radically alters the activities of the tissue cells, causing
them to secrete toxins, or organic poisons. These affect
the organism in various ways. The nutrition of the cells
becomes insufficient Their fats or carbohydrates may be
used up too rapidly, bringing corresponding changes in the
waste products. Sugar may accumulate in the blood, since
the tissues are unable to absorb the usual amount. Con-
gestion in the intestinal canal will cause further toxins to
develop. The body soon gives those symptoms of sickness
which are merely indications of changed metabolism. The
internal nerve-endings send the danger signals which we
know as pain. There may be heightened temperature, a
cough, an attack of vomiting, a loss of appetite, a general
feeling of lassitude. For the correction of these bad
chemical conditions, man has learned the empirical use of
drugs. Organs may be artificially stimulated, toxins
counteracted, elimination improved. We know the end
result, but practically nothing of the processes involved.
The disturbance to the system is liable to be as great as the
benefit. The tendency in modem Medicine is to consider
such treatment merely an emergency measure. The real
aim is to bring about such change in diet or other condi-
tions as will give the body's own chemistry a chance to
right itself.
The disturbance of the chemical equilibrium of the body
may be due to microorganisms. The bacteria and other
types which are responsible for infectious diseases, usually
enter through the mouth or nose, or through wounds in the
skin. When able to multiply, they generate toxins by their
action on food materials and body cells. The toxins are
110 CHAOS OE COSMOS?
the direct cause of tlie disease, through the disturbance of
functional activities.
Man's attack on these dangerous organisms, in the
interest of health, has followed four lines. In the first
place, our aim is to reduce the sources of infection, by
isolating persons who may be carriers, and by destroying as
far as possible the bacteria themselves. Of the success of
this work we shall have more to say in the next chapter.
In the second place, our effort is directed toward keeping
the human body in the most perfect physical condition.
Man has a natural power of disease resistance. With an
unbroken skin, and ducts and hair follicles in normal con-
dition, there is no danger of surface infection. The
mucous membranes tend to protect the inner surfaces.
Although disease germs are constantly present in the
mouths of healthy persons, some of them are removed
mechanically, and others checked or destroyed by the acid
secretions in the mouth and other organs. The leucocytes,
or white corpuscles of the blood, are active devourers of
bacteria, after the latter have been rendered appetizing
by contact with certain chemical substances in the body
fluids known as opsonins. If a tissue has been injured,
the leucocytes tend to gather around the infected spot and
destroy the predatory organisms. This bodily reaction is
known as inflammation. It often leads to the formation
of a wall of cells that localizes the disturbance. When
toxins develop, the natural tendency of the body is to de-
velop antitoxins to combat them. The degree of inamunity,
general or specific, varies greatly with the individual, and
with the state of health. Fifty per cent of all normal
persons, for example, possess in their blood a natural anti-
toxin for diphtheria. A person who has had an infectious
disease is usually immune to it afterward.
The third line of attack is the development of artificial
immunity. Weakened or modified viruses known as vac-
cines, usually the dead bacteria in some form, are given,
to stimulate the development of natural defences against
THE CONTROL OF HEALTH 111
the disease. In antiserum treatment, the protective sub-
stances, instead of being developed in the body, are sup-
plied from other animals, which have been innoculated with
the disease. Sometimes, as in diphtheria, the serum in-
jected is designed to neutralize the toxin. In other cases,
for example pneumonia, the aim is to kill the bacteria
themselves, directly or indirectly, and the serum does not
create immunity. The advance in practice in this depart-
ment of Medicine, with the knowledge of organic chemistry
that lies behind it, must rank as one of the greatest
achievements of Science.
Fourthly, we have the treatment of the disease after it
has developed. The aim is to restore, as rapidly as pos-
sible, the patient's power of disease resistance. Antisenmis
and germicides are applied, when these will be useful.
Diet, elimination and temperature are carefully regulated,
and organs stimulated to renewed activity. In other words
we do, under conditions of great disadvantage, what could
have been done in most cases by preventive medicine and
hygiene. To cure the sick, through scientific knowledge,
shows the cooperation of man with God. Yet it is co-
operation of a distinctly lower order than that involved
in the preservation of health. The resulting adjustment to
the Universe is far less certain and complete. It is like
putting out a blaze in a rubbish-littered basement, when
we might have kept the building in such condition that
there would have been no fire.
In this connection a further employment of microor-
ganisms may be mentioned. Metchnikoff made the dis-
covery that ill health was due largely to putrefaction in
the intestine, caused by certain bacteria. If we could re-
place these bacteria by others of a harmless type, health
would be promoted and life prolonged. He claimed that
it was possible to do this through feeding milk soured by
the Bacillus hulgaricus, Metchnikoff's theory appeared in
1907, and was widely exploited. We know now that he had
picked out the wrong organism. I have been able to follow
il2 CHAOS OR COSMOS?
somewliat closely the series of experiments carried out in
the Yale laboratories under the direction of Professor
Rettger. They have demonstrated that the beneficial re-
sults are due to the Bacillus acidopliilus, which is strikingly
similar to the hulgaricus in appearance. When we feed
milk soured by the former organism, it becomes predomi-
nant in the intestine and the putrefactive bacteria are elim-«
inated. The experiments were made largely with white
rats. All mammalian digestion follows a common line, and
similar results have already been obtained with human
beings. It seems probable that human digestive troubles
will in future be controlled through the Bdcillus acido-
philuSj by the addition of cultures to the normal diet.*
A person's state of mind is an important element in
physical health. The connection is very close between con-
scious or subconscious thought and the system of nerves
which control secretion and the distribution of blood.
An idea may bring out tears or sweat, make the mouth
water, cause blushing, pallor, cold hands or feet Eecent
studies have shown that calmness, contentment and pleas-
ureable emotion are necessary for perfect functioning of
the digestive organs. On the other hand, worry, vexation,
anger, fear, in fact any strong emotional excitement, will
cause the secretion of adrenin from the adrenal glands.
This in turn brings other bodily changes. Blood pressure
is raised, and sugar increased in blood and urine. Saliva
and gastric juices are no longer secreted. Contraction
ceases in the muscles which move food through the stomach
and intestines. The result is temporary or chronic indi-
gestion, to which the name "emotional dyspepsia" has
been given. At times, however, the secretion of adrenin
under strong emotional excitement may have a physiologi-
cal value. The increased blood supply, its diversion from
certain areas, and its high energy content, make greater
muscular activity possible. Heavy breathing gives room
•Leo F. Rettger and Harry A. Cheplin, Transformation of the
Intestinal Flora, 1921.
THE CONTEOL OF HEALTH 113
for additional carbon dioxide in the blood. The adrenin
relaxes the smooth muscles in the lungs, and in general
acts as an antidote to fatigue. These values, which were
vital in the struggles of primitive man, are utilized today
in the exertion and excitement of athletic contests and
other forms of active exercise.^
Medicine is now making use of this close connection
between the mind, and the nervous system which regulates
the activity of the body. Persons constantly make sug-
gestions to themselves regarding their bodily condition.
And these suggestions are being carried out, sometimes to
a remarkable degree as in paralysis of the limbs or produc-
tion of scars on the skin. In functional nervous troubles,
the patient is not only liable to various mental delusions.
Practically any organ or part of the body may be affected.
The aim of the trained operator is to displace suggestions
of sickness, and encourage suggestions of mental and physi-
cal health. The conscious personality of an adult is pro-
tected by a sort of armor, formed by the habits and fric-
tions of daily experience. Beneath this are the subcon-
scious depths to which reference was made in an earlier
chapter. The problem is to pierce this armor and thus
reach the undermind, with its immense possibilities for
initiating new attitudes and controlling bodily changes.
Sometimes this is done through a sudden shock. The
undermind may be directly exposed, as in hypnotic sleep.
Or casual conversation will give an entrance through in-
direct suggestion. To reach that mysterious region be-
neath the threshold of ordinary consciousness, is to hold
at least one of the keys to health.^
The cures made in our psychiatric laboratories are paral-
leled by Christian Science and by the Roman Catholic
shrine at Lourdes. In these cases the same method of sug-
gestion is followed, although blindly and without ade-
*W. B. Cannon, Bodily Changes m Pain, Hunger, Fear a/nd Rage,
1915.
•Percy Dearmer, Body and 8€ Impulse in Industry, 1918.
ATTEMPTED EEMEDIES 207
task of any Socialist society must be to increase the pro-
ductivity of labor. ... If the working class of this or
any other country should take possession of the existing
organization of production, there would not be enough in
the fund now going to the capitalist class to satisfy the
requirements of the workers, even if not a penny of com-
pensation were paid to the expropriated owners." ^*
What our study has indicated is the benefit that has
tended to result to both employer and employee from the
improvement in conditions of labor and the increase of re-
ward, with a resulting rise in standard of living. One
cannot read Miss Tarbell's book on New Ideals in Business,
without a realizing sense that good treatment is good busi-
ness. The ideal of a recognized common interest in the
work of production has been eloquently expressed by King.
"Let Faith be substituted for Fear; let mutual considera-
tion and confidence supplant suspicion, and constructive
good-will replace resistance; let the parties to Industry
recognize a mutuality, not a conflict of interest, in all that
pertains to maximum production and equitable distribu-
tion of wealth ; and what is the result ? Immediately, fresh
energies are released, a new freedom is given to effort in
Industry. Productivity is increased, as are also the re-
spective rewards of all the parties." ^^
The second fact suggested by our study helps to explain
the present difficulty in realizing this ideal. It is appar-
ent today, even more clearly than in the pre-War period,
that good treatment of labor may bring bad results. This
fact has mystified many employers. But it simply means
that there are psychological factors, the neglect of which
may vitiate the advantage of better working conditions and
larger rewards. The parties to Industry are individual
human beings, not machines. The employer is human.
His unconscious hypocrisy, his patronizing paternalism,
even his indigestion or domestic troubles, may affect the
** John Spargo, Bolshevism, 1919, 287.
"W. L. M. King, Industry wnd Humanity^ 1918, 261.
208 CHAOS OE COSMOS?
spirit of the entire plant. The foreman is human. A pig-
headed or bad-tempered or domineering overseer has been
known to undo the best-laid plans of the management. The
workman is very human. He has his own moods and
whims, his family or financial worries, his days of ner-
vousness and low vitality. He is filled with the traditions
and prejudices of his race, religion, class and trade. !N^o
two workmen are alike. One likes to work under strict
discipline, another resents authority. One man may en-
joy a monotonous task, where his mate, apparently with
no higher intelligence, is irritated by it. In different
groups of workmen, we find the same infinite permutations
of personality, complicated by racial mixtures and the
character of the group leadership. The proper handling of
industrial relations is indeed a fine art. 'No mechanical
scheme can be counted on to give specific results.
The most striking characteristic of the present-day
workman, particularly in the semi-skilled trades, would
seem to be his independence. The democratic spirit has
gripped him. He is no longer satisfied with mere freedom
of contract, or a cinch-hold on the rewards of production.
The recent situation in Industry has been thus interpreted
to me by an industrial relations manager, who had been
able to gain the worker's point of view through several
years of practical experience. Before the War, with the
surplus of labor and the fluctuating demands of Industry,
the dominant motive was fear. The workman was haunted
by the dread of losing his job. He did what he was told
to do, and speeded up his output, on pain of having his
place taken by another man. A type of foreman was
developed whose success was gauged by his ability to drive
the men under him. During the War, with the curtailment
of the labor supply and the demand of the ITation for in-
creased production, employers appealed to their men for
cooperation in the industry, on patriotic grounds. This
appeal met a somewhat general response. A large num-
ber of plants installed some plan of employees' represen-
ATTEMPTED KEMEDIES 209
tation, of which I shall speak later. On the part of the
employers, however, this idea was not deep-seated ; it was
intended merely for a patriotic emergency. Most of them
proceeded to forget it, and hoped that their employees
would do the same. But the workmen did not forget.
They felt that they had been promised certain things, and
that these promises ought to be fulfilled. They had been
given a taste of democratic management, and refused to
go back to the old autocratic relations. With the con-
tinued labor shortage, they had lost their fear ; they could
no longer be driven. The result was seen in the general
industrial unrest, and, more specifically, in lowered out-
put, irregularity in reporting for work, and the tremen-
dous increase in the labor turnover, the proportion of new
men hired reaching in some plants as high as 1,000 per cent
a year.
How far this free and democratic spirit will evaporate
under changed economic conditions, no one can predict.
The fear of unemployment is again enforcing discipline
and increasing output. But a man's experience of democ-
racy is like a ratcheted wheel, which goes forward but can-
no*- go backward. I am inclined to think that what Hen-
derson wrote six years ago is even more true today. "The
modern workman never can be morally content and satis-
fied as long as his mind, will and voice count for nothing in
the direction of the industry and its product. He may not
yet be adequately prepared for that responsibility ; his am-
bition may outrun his education, but he is looking forward
to it, and he chafes while he waits." ^^
Our study has shown that the motive of acquisitiveness
cannot be utilized beyond a certain point for the stimula-
tion of output. There are other important instincts, how-
ever, which modem Industry has tended to overlook or sup-
press. Increasing specialization has left little scope for
"Chas. R. Henderson, Citizens in Industry, 1915, xv. Cf. Report
of President's Indust. Conf., 1920 ; Wm. R. Basset, When the Worker
Helps You Manage, 1919; Meyer Bloomfield, Survey, 28, 312,
1912.
210 CHAOS OE COSMOS?
the creative instinct, the craftsman's joy in the finished
product. There seems to be no possibility of going back
to the old system, where the worker in a shoe factory, for
example, made a complete shoe. To secure a general re-
vival of the spirit of craftsmanship, two lines are being
followed. The first is educational. Much may be hoped
for from the modem movement for vocational training,
of which I have already spoken. The second line of ap-
proach is the development of a worker's interest in the in-
dustry through some measure of democratic control. We
all find greater joy in work when we feel a sense of part-
nership in the process, or ownership in the product. "The
kitchen-maid may very easily find the dish washing a
drudge's task, while the housewife does not so consider it.
The difference lies in the interest of the worker in the
household as a member of it." ^"^ The same psychological
fact is likely to be true in Industry. Democratic control
allows scope for the instinct of self-assertion, and for the
herd instinct, which leads men to act together and follow
the leadership they have themselves helped to create. Ex-
periments along this line will occupy our attention in the
next chapter.
"Fred H. Colvin, Labor Turnover, Loyalty and Output, 1919, 25.
See also Ordway Tead, Instincts in Industry, 1918, an invaluable
book for the student of industrial relations.
XIX.
DEMOCRACY IN INDUSTRY.
From the standpoint of Society as a whole, our elaborate
industrial organization is not for the sake of profits or
wages, but rather for the production of community goods
and the development of complete men. A system which
fell far short of the possibilities of production, or which
dwarfed the many for the sake of the few, must be re-
garded as a social failure. And social failure is cosmic
maladjustment, a lack of harmony with the fundamental
conditions of the Universe. There are therefore two gen-
eral criteria for the success of an industrial policy: its
ability to maintain the highest quantity and quality of pro-
duction, or whatever public service is to be performed,
and its physical and moral effect on the men engaged
in it. The two are closely related. To obtain a high out-
put from the worker, as we have seen, it is necessary to
secure, not only proper working and housing conditions,
but the free expression of those instincts which lead work-
men to do their best work. These factors in turn aid the
full development of personality. It is in his daily task
that a man normally finds his life and maintains his self-
respect.^
In this chapter I shall outline some of the experiments
that have been made along the line of industrial democ-
racy. They will indicate the results which may be ex-
pected from the stimulation of other human motives, in
addition to those involved in financial rewards.^ The fol-
*See Whiting Williams, Whafs on the Workers' Mind, 1920,
chap. 12.
^See ante p. 209.
211
212 CHAOS OR COSMOS?
lowing examples are chosen to illustrate various types of
cooperation.
The Endicott-Johnson factories, near Binghamton,
N. Y., the largest shoe manufacturers in the United States,
have often been cited as an ideal of industrial relations.
The owners grew up with the shoe and leather business,
and Geo. F. Johnson, to whom the labor policy is largely
due, started life as a shoemaker. About 13,000 workers
were employed. In over 36 years there had been no sus-
picion of labor trouble. Labor leaders who visited the
plant made no attempt to organize the workers, stating
that the company was doing for its help what the unions
were trying to do. The workers were well paid. Every-
thing possible was done for their comfort and enjoyment,
and that of their families. They had absolute confidence
in the management, which was constantly striving to un-
derstand their point of view. There were no formal shop
committees. Every employee knew that he could go di-
rectly to the general manager, if he felt that injustice was
being done. The employers and employees sent their chil-
dren to the same schools, attended the same churches, and
were interested in the same sports. The policy of the com-
pany was to fill no important position outside of its own
ranks, and the door of promotion was always open. The
workers were encouraged to make suggestions for improve-
ing the business ; one laborer was paid $5,000 in cash for
a valuable idea. Profit sharing was introduced at the be-
ginning of 1920, not as an incentive, but as a logical out-
come of the mutuality of interest.^
It is obvious that such close personal relationships are
impossible in the average corporation of the present day,
whose managers have received their training in business
rather than in the industrial process itself. I have given
this example, partly for its historical interest, as illustrat-
ing the survival in a large modern plant of the old time re-
•The ideals of the owners are described in Red Cross Mag., Dec,
1919; System, Jan., 1920; Outlook, Apr. 14, 1920.
DEMOCRACY IN INDUSTEY 213
lations of master and men ; partly because it suggests the
spirit of fair dealing and sympathetic understanding which
lies at the basis of successful labor management. Many
corporations are requiring their future superintendents
and staff officers to spend weeks or even months at the
bench, in order to gain the point of view of the man with
the dinner pail.
Another ideal, showing what may be accomplished by
arousing interest in productive processes, is found in the
work of Kobert B. Wolf with the sulphite pulp plant of
the Burgess Co., at Berlin, JST. H. In six years time, an
annual output of 42,000 tons of the lowest quality was
changed to 111,000 tons of the highest quality. "His first
step was the working out of scientific standards for the
tasks. To begin with, for example, there were nine men
engaged in the important process of cooking the pulp.
Each man cooked by his own rule-of -thumb method, and
the result was nine different kinds of pulp, of varying de-
grees of badness. There was on the staff of the plant a
chemist, whose function was to make certain stereotyped
tests. Mr. Wolf proceeded to make work interesting for
the chemist by putting him at the job of improving the
quality of the pulp. For a long time he studied the cook-
ing process, and through the cooperation of the workmen
who did the cooking he accumulated a large amount of
technical data. At length, by the use of this data, and
again with the help of the workmen, a combination of
variables, temperature, pressure, cooking-time, etc., was
worked out which produced good pulp. A chart was plot-
ted which showed graphically the different factors in the
^deaF cooking process. The cookers readily grasped this
chart, and they were then able to compare their own per-
formance with the chart and gradually to make their ef-
forts approximate the standard. . . . Progress records,
either for individuals or groups, were worked out to affect
almost every one of the twelve or thirteen hundred men in
the mill. It is interesting to know that this scheme was
214 CHAOS OE COSMOS?
first hit upon by accident Mr. Wolf planned a bonus sys-
tem, and when this was turned down by the owners of the
plant he conceived the idea of posting the records from
which the bonuses would have been paid. As an improve-
ment on purely quantity records quality records were
evolved, and it was found that certain hard feelings engen-
dered by quantity competition disappeared and that a
spirit of intelligent cooperation among the men took its
place. To improve their own work men made suggestions
for improving operating conditions, which eventually re-
sulted in the redesigning of most of the apparatus. Then
one day a workman said, ^We don't know what things
cost ; if we knew we could save materials.' The result was
that cost sheets, which had first been given only to heads
of departments, were given to each foreman and through
him to the men. Foremen got into the habit of figuring
estimates on the cost of their work, and then trying to beat
their own estimates. Some of the workmen would bring
scales into the mill to weigh the material delivered to them,
to make sure the storehouse was not beating them on the
material charged against the job. The net result was the
cutting in two of the maintenance material cost, with a
saving of $20,000 a month." In Mr. Wolf's words : "Our
men were well paid, better paid than those in any similar
plant in the country, because they earned it. But the pay-
ment was entirely on a weekly and hourly basis." Men
frequently said to him: "We don't like to be bribed to
do a good job. We would like to have the privilege of
doing a good job without being baited to do it." Similar
plans carried out in a group of Canadian plants, had the
hearty support of the union. John P. Burke, president
of the International Brotherhood of Pulp, Sulphite and
Paper Mill Workers, says: "Four years ago I worked in
the mill. I know what it is to go through the same deaden-
ing motions hour after hour and day after day. When
that work was made interesting it was as much of a bene-
fit to the workers as taking four hours off the workday.
DEMOCRACY IN INDUSTRY 215
When Mr. Wolf explained to the local union what he pro-
posed to do, and when we were satisfied that he had no ul-
terior motives, we cooperated with him, hecause the labor
movement believes in progress, not in stagnation." *
The plan of industrial cooperation inaugurated by the
Colorado Fuel and Iron Co., at the close of the strike de-
scribed in a previous chapter, was a compromise between
the system of individual bargaining previously in force,
and recognition of the miners' union, which the company
had persistently refused. John D. Kockefeller, Jr. made
B. personal visit to Colorado, meeting the miners in their
homes. He said to them : "They tell you that we are ene-
mies. I have come here to tell you that we are not ene-
mies, but partners. Labor and Capital are partners, not
enemies. Neither one can get on without the other. Their
interests are common, not antagonistic." The idea of Mr.
King had been to devise some machinery which would not
only prevent labor from being exploited, but secure the
cordial cooperation which would further industrial effi-
ciency. A system of representative government was
worked out, with joint committees for each district, and
for the industry as a whole. An Employees' Bill of
Eights assured strict compliance with federal and state
laws, the posting at each mine of the wage scale and work-
ing conditions, the right of assemblage, and of membership
or non-membership without discrimination in any union.
Grievances were to be investigated. An appeal could be
taken to the officers of the company, and from these to the
State Commission, whose findings were to be regarded as
binding on both parties. The plan was submitted to the
men, and adopted by a majority of 84 per cent of the votes
cast. It is interesting to note that the constitution was
printed in seven languages.^
* Survey, 44, 112, Apr. 17, 1920. See also Wolf's paper on Non-
Financial Incentives, Am. Soc. of Mechan. Engineers, Dec, 1918.
°W. L. M. King, Industry and Humanity, 1918, 434 ff.; Commis.
on Indust. ReVs, 1916, 9, 8449 //.; J. D. Rockefeller, Jr., The Colo-
rado Indust. Plan, 1916.
216 CHAOS OR COSMOS?
There can be no question that this plan was offered by
the company in good faith, and represented a radical
change in policy. Many of the worst evils were corrected.
The mine foreman was shorn of some of his arbitrary
power. Cooperation between the representatives of em-
ployers and employees secured a great improvement in con-
ditions of labor and housing. The men, however, appear
to have resented it as an attempt to forestall their own
democratic plan of representation through the union. They
took little interest in the elections, and made almost no use
of the machinery for presenting grievances.^ Those famil-
iar with the situation were not surprised to learn of another
strike in the Fall of 1921, following a 30 per cent reduction
in wages. The statement of the company's counsel, on "Noy,
17, is highly significant, in the light of previous history:
"We will let the mines remain idle if the men go out until
such time as they are ready to report back for work. The
Colorado Fuel and Iron Company, contrary to current re-
ports, will not import one strike breaker. If any need
arises for protection of our property we will look to the
State to provide it. We will not employ one additional
watchman and we refuse to admit there will be any need
for mine guards."
An associate of the C. F. and I. in the strike of 1913,
the Victor American Fuel Co., was forced by labor condi-
tions to reverse its attitude toward organized labor, and
make a contract with the United Mine Workers. This
Agreement will serve as well as any to illustrate the col-
lective bargaining carried out for many years in a large
section of American industry, by what Hoxie calls the
"business type" of labor union. It covers 17 companies in
Colorado, and 26 mines, for each of which the piece and
times rates are minutely specified. "In the interest of
good and efficient service," the contract reads, "the Union
• John A. Fitch, Two Tears of the Rockefeller Plan, Survey, 39, 14,
Oct. 6, 1917. See also comment by J. E. Williams, id., 35, 145,
Nov. 6, 1915.
DEMOCRACY IN INDUSTRY 217
agrees to promote and encourage a feeling of friendliness,
cooperation and contentment at the mines of the Company
in order that there shall be no violation of the contract;
and to use all the power and influence of the Union, its
^National, District and Local Officers to see that not only
the letter but the spirit of this contract shall be obeyed.
Violations of the contract, such as have occurred in the
past,*^ will not be tolerated, and those responsible for agi-
tating violations or other trouble will be punished accord-
ing to the provisions of the laws of the Union, the intention
being that the mines of the Company may operate prosper-
ously and without interruption at the highest possible pro-
duction with competent industrious workmen." Simple
machinery is provided for the adjustment of grievances,
the base of the system being the Pit Committee and the
Mine Foreman, and the apex an umpire selected by the
Presidents of the company and of the United Mine Work-
ers, whose decision is final. No strikes are allowed for
any reason, members violating this rule having $2.00 per
day deducted from their earnings. The company is to be
fined for a lockout, at the rate of $2.00 per day for each
employee affected. Any employee who absents himself
from duty for two days or more, or who persists in work-
ing irregularly, forfeits his position. The company is
to compensate any miner unjustly discharged. Other sec-
tions provide full regulations to cover such matters as tim-
bering, docking, checkweighman, etc. The union dues are
to be collected by the company, as a deduction from the pay
roll. This standardizing of industrial relations is possible
only with a strong and national Trade Union. Many em-
ployers prefer to negotiate with a union agent rather than
with their own men, as he has a knowledge of the industry
as a whole and is free from local bias.
The plan of Shop Committees or Works Councils, was
given great impetus by the War Labor Board. Up to the
' This refers to the previous Agreement, renewed for two yean
on April 1, 1920.
218 CHAOS OE COSMOS?
middle of 1919, over 200 plants, with 500,000 workers,
were known to have installed some form of employees' rep-
resentation.^ These ranged from mere discussion clubs, up
to the representative government of the Filene store in
Boston, or the Procter and Gamble Co., with the employees
participating as stockholders and represented on the Board
of Directors. The success of the movement has been
equally various. Where honestly and carefully installed,
with the approval of the workers themselves, the plan has
tended to bring mutual understanding and harmony. It
cannot safely be used as a substitute for the labor union,
if the men strongly desire a union. In many cases re-
markable results have been achieved, often in connection
with some form of profit-sharing. I select an example
which has been in operation for a decade.
In 1910, the Philadelphia Kapid Transit Co. was on the
verge of collapse. "No dividends had been paid for eight
years. Equipment was in shocking condition, and service
demoralized. Two recent strikes, resulting in rioting and
bloodshed, had cost the company and the city millions of
dollars, while the* men had lost more than half a million in
wages alone. Another strike was brewing. E. T. Stotes-
bury was persuaded to assume the direction of the com-
pany, as a civic duty, and money found for the purchase
of modem cars. The new management took hold with
the understanding that in five years' time it would provide
the public with an adequate system of transportation, and
the men with such increased wages and improved working
conditions as cooperation might make possible: stock-
holders must wait for returns until these two questions had
been disposed of. The plan of industrial relations was
worked out by Thomas E. Mitten, chairman of the execu-
tive committee, on the basis of his previous experience in
'Nat. Indust. Conf. Board, Works Councils in the U. 8., 1919;
New Jersey Bureau of State Research, Shop Committees and Indust.
Councils, 1919; Wm. L. Stoddard, The Shop Com., 1919; John
Leitch, Man to Man, 1919; Ordway Tead and Henry C. Metcalf,
Personnel Administration, 1920.
DEMOCRACY IN INDUSTEY 219
Chicago. Finding that about 22% of the gross passenger
receipts were being used in the payment of wages and sick
benefits, Mr. Mitten had this percentage set aside as a fund
from which the men would receive their compensation.
Any increase in receipts, due to larger cars and improved
routing, or to greater promptness, honesty or courtesy on
the part of the employees, would mean larger wages to the
men. The actual disposition of this fund was put in the
hands of the cooperative committee, made up of two motor-
men or conductors elected by secret ballot in each of the
car bams, or divisions. These two representatives ar-
ranged the runs made from the barn, acted as a grievance
committee for the men, and cooperated with the company
in the matter of discipline. Once a month the committee
met as a whole, the company being represented (without
vote) by the division superintendents. Among the matters
taken up were new routings and time-tables proposed by
the company, the more important cases of grievance, the
management of the cooperative benefit and purchasing
plans operated by the men, and the wage scale which would
be justified by the condition of the 22% fund. In carry-
ing out the plan the company dealt with the men as indir
viduals, divisions among the employees making it impos^
sible for Mr. Mitten to deal directly with the union as he
had done in Chicago. The understanding was that the
latter plan would be followed whenever two-thirds of the
men so voted.
Two strikes were attempted, but caused no serious inter-
ruption to service. The second, in 1918, was investigated
by the War Labor Board, which dismissed the complaint.
On the advice of this body, the 22% wage fund was abol-
ished, in order to bring wages up to the current scale.
Other modifications were made at this time. The cooper-
ative plan was extended to all departments of the company,
joint committees taking the place of the former commit-
tees of employees. In cases of controversy, representatives
of employer and 'employees were to vote separately, by
220 CHAOS OR COSMOS?
secret ballot. Final settlement was vested in a Board of
Arbitration.
The results of the Stotesbury-Mitten plan were very re-
markable. In the first three years, resignations were re-
duced from 1,390 to 337, and dismissals from 1 in 6 to 1
in 20. The average wage of conductors and motormen was
increased from 23 cents an hour in 1911 to 31 cents in
1916, 43 cents in July, 1918, and 58 cents in 1919. The
gross earnings of the company increased 89%. The rate
of fare for the public had not been raised. The average
rides per capita in Philadelphia increased from 288 in
1910 to over 425 in 1919. In other words, an increase in
wages of 150% had been matched by 120% increase in
production. The number of accidents was cut in half.
The employees developed into what Mr. Mitten has called
"the most courteous, careful, and efficient body of motor-
men and conductors in America." Of a force of about
10,000, over 99% were members of the Cooperative Wel-
fare Association, which furnished a blanket life insurance
policy of $1,000 at a cost of $1.00 per month, in addition
to sick benefits and pensions.^
In the Government Arsenals, the signing of the Armis-
tice threatened a serious reduction of business and em-
ployment. Permission was given by the Secretary of
War for the arsenals to bid on the peace-time require-
ments of the government departments, in competition with
private concerns. The shop committees which had been
already introduced, with the backing of the unions, began
to take on new and interesting functions. When a proposal
for a bid is received by an arsenal, "the employees' com-
mitteemen become immediately active. First, it is decided
by the central committee whether its arsenal can manufac-
ture the article upon which bids are sought. Manifestly it
is to the employee's interest to get the work for his particu-
lar arsenal, since the tenure of his employment depends
*Commi88. on Indust. ReVs, 1916, 3, 2733 ^; The Cooperative
Plan of the P. R. T., 1918; Year Booh, 1919.
DEMOCRACY IN INDUSTRY 221
upon securing enough work to prevent further reduction
in the arsenal force. The tendency of the commanding
officer of the arsenal is naturally and properly toward con-
servatism ; if the proposal is for work rather aside from the
usual lines of manufacture in his arsenal, he inclines to
play safe ; that is, either not to bid, or to bid fairly high
to avoid loss. The employees incline to bid low to get the
work done and hold their jobs. The result actually reached
is that the employees investigate with great care the possi-
bilities of economic manufacture of the particular article
being considered. The best men on each process which
will be involved if the contract is secured are consulted,
and, in effect, the combined experience and resourceful-
ness of the employees is massed on the problem. Re-
peatedly the estimates of the employees on labor costs have
been so low as to give pause to the commanding officer and
the planning department, which advises him. The em-
ployees then are put in the position of definite responsi-
bility for their own estimates of the performance which
they can deliver. They virtually guarantee the estimates as
to direct labor costs — in fact, in at least one instance the
employees were required by the ordinance officer in charge
of the shop to guarantee in writing to meet an estimate
which they had made and which he believed to be too
low. Not an instance has occurred thus far in which the
employees have not held labor cost below their estimate."
With the change in function of the workers' organization,
has come a change in the character of the union leadership,
good fighters giving place to men with ability as produc-
tive workmen. ^^
In September, 1910, a Protocol or treaty of peace was
signed in the Ladies' Garment Industry in New York
City, after many years of warfare and a general strike of
unusual bitterness. The contracting parties were the
Cloak, Suit and Skirt Manufacturers' Protective Associ-
ation, and certain locals of the International Ladies' Gar-
" Industrial Democ. at Rock Island, Nation, Sept. 13, 1919.
222 CHAOS OE COSMOS?
ment Workers' Union. As the union had insisted on a
closed shop and the employers on an open shop, Mr. Bran-
deis' suggestion of a preferential shop was made the basis
of compromise. Under this arrangement, "the employer is
bound to maintain union standards as to hours, etc., and
to give the preference in employing and retaining help to
union members. On their side the unions are bound to
maintain discipline in the shop among their members, to
restrain them from breaches of contract and unauthorized
strikes, and to see that they live up to the conditions of the
Protocol; in other words, in return for the preference
shown them, the unions assume full responsibility for the
conduct of their members." ^^ Subcontracting within the
shop and the taking of work home were forbidden, thus
doing away with the sweatshop and the tenement worker.
Minor abuses in shop practice were corrected, a minimum
wage-scale established, and a 50-hour week. Strikes and
lockouts were prohibited during the life of the treaty, for
which there was no time limit.
Three joint bodies were set up by the Protocol. The
Board of Sanitary Control was to establish standards for
the industry. Because of the character of its personnel,
and the efficiency of the director. Dr. Geo. M. Price, its
work was remarkably efficient. A systematic inspection of
the 1,243 shops in 'New York City, showed that about two-
thirds were defective either in sanitation, fire protection,
or both. At the end of six months, only 54 of these re-
mained unimproved. Under the terms of the agreement,
no member of the union would work in a shop declared
unsanitary, and no manufacturer would give out work for
this shop to do. The erring employer either complied with
the recommendations of the Board, or was forced out of
business. Twenty-seven such "sanitary strikes" occurred
within the first year. Thus both the worker and the em-
" Chas. H. Winslow, Bur. of Labor Statistics, Bull 98, 1912, 203.
See also Bull's 144 and 145, 1914; Monthly Review, Dec, 1917, 19;
Julius H. Cohen, Law and Order in Industry, 1916.
DEMOCRACY IN INDUSTRY 223
ployer were protected against the cut-throat competition
of unscnipulous firms.
The Board of Arbitration, made up of such distin-
guished names as Louis D. Brandeis, Hamilton Holt and
Morris Hillquit, acted as a court of appeal, chiefly confin-
ing itself, however, to differences which arose between the
manufacturers' association and the union. The Board of
Grievances, consisting of five members from each side,
served as a trade court. Of the 1,004 cases adjusted in
the first year, Y98 were settled by the deputy clerks, act-
ing as a joint mediation committee, 202 by the Board it-
self, and 4 appealed to the Board of Arbitration.
The weakness of the system, as events proved, lay in
the bi-partisan character of the trade court, and the lack
of any body of law on which to base its decisions. The ma-
chinery broke down after five years, ostensibly on the issue
of the employer's right to discharge competent union work-
men, but actually because of impatience on both sides with
the moderate progress made in raising business standards
and conditions.
The attempt to introduce a constitution into the industry
was not lost. Collective bargaining continued in the
Cloak and Suit trade, under various forms of agreement.
The Protocol idea had been adopted by other branches of
the Ladies' Garment industry, in most of which it is still
in force. Robert W. Bruere, who acted on the Board of
Arbitration in the Waist and Dress group, has given inter-
esting testimony as to the effect of industrial parliaments.
Discussion, and adjustment on the basis of evidence, was
substituted for strikes and lockouts, which until a few
years ago kept the largest of our clothing industries in a
state of perpetual turmoil. "I have seen employers and
workers come together in the meetings of wage boards,
tense with bitterness and hostility. I have heard them
wrangle for hours over charges of bad faith and have
seen them grow calm and reasonable as the questioning of
the chairman brought out the facts on both sides and de-
324 CHAOS OE COSMOS?
veloped the basis for an understanding. Often both sides
will show an unexpected readiness to subordinate what
they had considered their absolute rights in the premises
to the larger interests of the industry, and to recognize
themselves and one another, not so much as enemies fight-
ing for a stake, but as industrial citizens with a common
interest in the prosperity of the trade and a common re-
sponsibility to the public." ^^
A parallel movement took place in the Men's Garment
trade. It began with the Hart, Schaffner and Marx agree-
ment, which has had a continuous life since February,
1911, with modifications and improvements, but without
any serious break. The plan has since been adopted by
other shops, and by clothing centers outside of Chicago.^*
This firm, which employs about 6,500 workers, is now
governed by the principle of the preferential union shop,
a large proportion of the employees being members of the
union. Each floor of their factories, containing from 100
to 200 workers, has a shop chairman, elected by the union
members. He is recognized as an officer of the union, in
charge of complaints and organization matters within the
shop. Complaints are first taken up by the shop chairman
with the foreman or superintendent. If no satisfaction ia
obtained, the case is reported to the union, which employs
four deputies, or business agents, one for each trade (coats,
vests, trousers and cutting.) The proper deputy, after
making an investigation, takes up the matter with the
firm's labor manager, a university professor trained in
Economics and given very broad powers. He is in charge
of Health and Safety, Education, Employment, Disci-
pline, and Wages and Eate Setting. He acts as the diplo-
matic agent of the firm in all matters involving the labor
force. Rates for piece work are set by a committee of
^Mecmitiff of the Minimum Wage, Harpers Mag., 132, 282, Jan.,
1916.
"Bur. of Labor Statistics, Bull. 198, 1916; New Jersey Bur. of
State Research, Shop Corn's and Jndttst. Counoils, July, 1&19, pp.
28, 34, 52.
DEMOCEACY IN INDUSTRY 225
three, one representing each side and a third member whom
they select. Cases where the piece-rate committee, or the
deputy and labor manager, fail to agree, are carried to the
Trade Board of the Chicago clothing industry. This
Board consists of an impartial chairman, and of ^ve repre-
sentatives of each side, who practically argue the case be-
fore him. The impartial chairman, paid jointly by the
manufacturers and the union, is a man of the highest char-
acter, chosen for his business acumen and diplomatic skill.
The firm's records as to costs, profits, etc., are placed at
his disposal, and his decisions are usually final. A Board
of Arbitration is added, for questions involving the inter-
pretation of the agreement. Back of the entire plan, on
paper and in practice, is the idea of cooperation in pro-
duction, and a community of interest.
By the middle of 1919, this form of collective bargain-
ing had come to include practically the entire industry. A
national agreement between the manufacturers' associa-
tion and the Amalgamated Clothing Workers was in pros-
pect. Makers of high-grade clothing found the stabiliz-
ing of labor and improvement of working conditions a
great advantage. But the small amount of capital required
in the business, the growth of subcontracting, and the sup-
ply of immigrant workers available in normal times, make
it diflScult for either the employers or the union to control
the smaller shops. Conditions in the N"ew York market
have been particularly chaotic.
The unions in the needle trades, which we have been
describing, are organized on industrial rather than craft
lines. They are extremely democratic, and characterized
by Socialism of a radical but idealistic type. They form,
as has been said, "a spiritual brotherhood, based upon a
common aspiration." ^* Their attitude towards the cloth-
ing industry is that of future proprietors, rather than
mere hired men. Efficiency methods, for example, at
which the old unionist looks askance, are cordially accepted.
*• J. M. Budish and Gl€o. Soule, The New Unionism, 1920, 157.
226 CHAOS OE COSMOS?
Their remarkable educational program aims at a broad cul-
ture and tbe mental emancipation of the working class,
so that they may be made ready to assume control of pro-
duction. As one observer has said : "The chief struggle of
the far-sighted leadership among the Amalgamated Cloth-
ing Workers is to keep in line the impatient extremists who
are not satisfied with steady growth, but want the mil-
lennium by tomorrow afternoon." ^^ What interests us here
is the view of the new unionism that industry, even in its
present stage, is a form of community service. The con-
vention of 1920 put itself in line with the old-time crafts-
men by declaring for definite standards of production, in
connection with the policy of payment by the week rather
than by the piece. In the course of the debate, Pres. Sid-
ney Hillman, who might be termed the father both of the
Hart, Schaffner and Marx agreement and of the Amalga-
mated Clothing Workers, said: "For myself, I do not
think that our union can adopt the ordinary rule of com-
merce, the principle of the business man, which is to give
as little as possible and to take as much as possible. We
must have a different attitude toward the industry. We
must accept responsibility for production. We cannot
have sabotage by withholding production : we cannot have
loafing; we must have production and we must recognize
our responsibility." ^* In the agreement drawn up be-
tween four silk ribbon manufacturers in !N"ew York, and
weavers affiliated with the new Amalgamated Textile
Workers, which grew out of the second Lawrence strike,
we find this statement : "Public interest requires increas-
ing production as a prime factor in reducing commodity
prices. Wages, hours and working conditions should be
regulated by this requirement." ^"^
All of these plans for cooperation in American industry
are confessedly experimental. Most of them have yet to
"Baker, New Industrial Urvresf, 1920, 197.
" Swrvey, 44, 275, May 22, 1920.
"/
tice, 154; honesty, 155; attain-
ment of character, 160-164;
problem of harmful forces,
165; standards of national re-
lations, 248, 327; cosmic basis,
xxi, 314; goal of personality,
317; change from individual to
social standards, 326
Ettor, J. J., 185-186
Eugenics, heredity, 69-73; envi-
ronment, 72-76, 320
Evans, M. S., 253
Evans, W. A., 121
Evil, in Nature, 165; in Society,
294, 3^0-321
352
IOT)EX
Evolntion, 52-60, 312; versus
aehievement, xxi, 316, 320;
stages, 344-347
Fairehild, H. P., 284
Farman, E. E., 273
Fatigue, 92-93, 201-202
Finite or infinite Universe, 45-
46
Fire protection, forests, 116-117;
buildings, 117-119
Fisher and Fisk, 106
Fitch, J. A., 181, 186, 216
Flexner, A., 127
Flexner, S., 295
Folks, H., 296
Force, in Physics, 26
Ford, Henry, 201
Foreign Missions, in Nigeria,
163-164; in Natal, 279
Forest fires, 116-117
Fosdick, H. E., 170
Foster, J. W., 267
France, 119, 139, 237; suspicion
of Germany, 239; commercial
reaction, 246-247 ; colonies,
257, 260-262; in Moroeeo, 265;
tariff war with Switzerland,
300
Francke, K., 234
Frank, Leo, 285
Frankel and Fleisher, 203
Fraternal organizations, 136
Freedom and determinism, xix,
94
Freeman, F. N., 73
French Eevolution, 235, 271
Friday, D., 239
Friedman, E. M., 248, 298, 300
Future, Jewish view of, 4-5; of
the earth, 318; of individual,
318-319; of the race, 323-328
Gantt, H. L., 201, 206, 326
Gary, Judge, 147
Geology, 44, 57, 339
Georgia Experiment Station, 97
Germany, 125; cult of Natural
Selection, 232 ; population,
233-234; theory of State, 234-
235; colonies, 240, 257, 262-
263 ; commercial penetration,
240; cost of military competi-
tion, 242-243; expansion of
industry, 243-244; economic na-
tionalism, 235, 244-246, 248;
inflation, 246-247; internal sit-
uation, 246, 248; in Turkey,
264; Morocco, 265; Persia,
265; Shantung, 271; Slesvig,
271; effect of War, 299
Gibbons, H. A., 263, 266-267
Gilbreth, F. B. and L. M., 93
Girault, A., 260-261
Gleason, A., 178
Globular clusters, 45, 337
Goldmark, J., 93
Goodwill, as business asset, 147-
150, 262; industrial asset, 227,
314-315
Gordon, K., 77
Gorgas, W. C, 121, 126
Gorilla, 72
Gourvitch, P. P., 244
Grant, L., 189
Gregory, W. K., 59
Grimke, A. H., 283
Groat, G. G., 178
Guatemala, 126, 295
Guayaquil, 126
Gulick, S. L., 267
Hadley, A. T., 151
Hagerty, J. E., 158-159
Hague Conferences, 306-307
Hale, E. E., 146
Hale, G. E., 44
Hall, W. E., 306
Hamburg, Ark., 125
Hamburg, Germany, 123
Hamilton-Beach Mfg. Co., 191
Hammond, L. H., 282
Hart, Schaffner and Marx, 224-
226
Harwood, W. S., 101
Hastings, E. G., 98
Hauser, H., 241, 245
Hays, W. M., 99
Health, 105-115, 119-126; inter-
national, 294-296
Hebrew literature, mystical ele-
ment, 4, 40
Henderson, C. B., 196, 209
Henderson, L. J., 55
Henley, W. E., 66
Heredity, 69-73
Herero revolt, 257
Herf ord, E. T., 4
Hershey, A. S., 306
Higgins, A. P., 306 s
INDEX
353
HiU, D. S., 206
Hill, H. W., 123
Hillman, S., 226
Hirn, Y., 84
Hollman, G., 5
Holt, E. B., 162
Home, as center of altruism, 134-
135
Honesty, 155; basis of credit,
157
Honey production, 99
Hookworm, 295
Hopkins, E. G., 343
Horse, changes in dentition, 58
Howard, E. D., 244
Howard, E., 106
Howe, Julia Ward, 81-83, 86
Hoxie, E. F., 178, 202
Huckel, O., 115
Hunter, E., 193
Huntington, E., 343
Hyndman, H. M., 263
Immortality, 318-319
Indentured labor, 255-256
India, 262-263
Individual, in Jesus ' teaching, 9 j
relation to the Universe, 65-
66, 77, 89, 102, 317; in in-
dustry, 207, 211, 228, 317, 325,
327
Industrial education, 205-206
Industrial Eelations Commission,
181, 183, 186, 192, 196
Industrial Workers of tke World,
183, 185-186
Industry, social aspects, 75, 90-
93, 154-155, 211, 317; modern
development, 176, 178; strug-
gle for advantage, 177; re-
sults of exploitation, 178-194;
effect of better working condi-
tions, 195; welfare work, 196;
profit sharing, 197; compulsory
arbitration, 198 ; government
regulation, 199; bonus, 200-
202 ; employment methods,
203 ; training departments,
204-206; experiments in co-
operation, 211-226; peace and
war, 238-239; as form of mu-
tual service, 326-327
Infantile paralysis, 295
Infant mortality, 124, 184
Influenza, 295
Ingersoll, B. G., 104
Inglis, A., 73
Inspiration, 81
Instincts, expression and repres-
sion, 75; altruistic, 141-142;
discipline of, 154, 162 ; acquisi-
tiveness, 200-202 ; construc-
tion and self-assertion, 209,
211; as motives of action, 228-
229, 315
Insurance, 118-119; social, 203,
327; against war, 307-308
Intelligence, 70-71, 74
International associations, 294,
296-297, 301
International Bridge and Struc-
tural Ironworkers, 187-188
International Labor Legislation,
Association for, 303; in Peace
Treaty, 304; Conference, 304-
305
International Ladies ' Garment
Workers, 221-223
International Law, 306
International Maritime Commit-
tee, 302
International Metal Workers,
303
Intuition, 81
Iowa Experiment Sta., 96-97
Ireland, A., 252
Island universes, 45
Italy, 139, 241; adventure in
Tripoli, 257
Jacoby, H., 44
Jamaica, 255, 284
Japan, results of war with Bus-
sia, 237; treatment of China,
267-269; rise in wages, 303
Jastrow, J., 77
Jeans, J. H,, 44, 384
Jeffreys, H., 339
Jennings, H. S., 341, 346
Jephson, H., 122
Jesus, modernness, 1; a construc-
tive thinker, xvi, 2, 311-312;
sources for his teaching, 2;
teaching in detail, 3-15; ideas
of astronomy, 43 ; on marriage,
68; use of term love, 134,
149; broadening of group al-
truism, 143; consideration as
self-interest, 148; system of
354
INDEX
ethics, 153, 162, 167; idea of
prayer, 167-171
Johnson, F. E., 186
Jones, D. F., 71, 101
Jordan, E. O., 106
Justice, 154-156 J for Negroes,
284-286, 289
Kaffirs, 278-281
Kapteyn, J. C, 46, 340
Keller, A. G., 252
Kellogg, v., 128
Kelly, E. W., 203, 205
Kerlin, E. T., 287
Kidd, B., 148, 252
King, W. L. M., 181, 207, 215
Kingdom of God, in Jesus'
teaching, 6-7, 9; not a Utopia,
149, 320; a cooperative enter-
prise, 316
Knopf, S. A., 125
Krehbiel, E., 307
Ku Klux Klan, 284, 287
Labor, moral value, 91; condi-
tions of efficiency, 92-93; un-
ions as centers of altruism, 136-
138; history and status, 176-
178; coal mining, 178-181;
lumbering, 181-183 ; textile
mills, 183-186 ; controversy
with National Erectors' Asso-
ciation, 187-188; N. Y. Build-
ing Trades Council, 189-190;
objection to welfare work, 197 ;
to profit sharing, 198; to com-
pulsory arbitration, 198; to
piece work, 201; to Scientific
Management, 201-202; unem-
ployment, 203; human factor,
207, 327; effect of war condi-
tions, 208; attempts to revive
craftsmanship, 210-220; needle
trades, 221-226; assuming re-
sponsibility for production,
226, 327; in tropics, 254-257;
international, 302-305, 309
Labor cost, and standard of liv-
ing, 200, 303
Labor turnover, 203, 205, 209
Ladies* Garment industry, 2£1-
223
Lane, C. B., 97
Laski, H. J., 151
Lauck, W. J., 186
Laughlin, J. L., 158, 247
Law, 155, 325; international, 306
Lawrence, Mass., 183-186
Lawrence, T. J., 306
Leacock, S., 178
League of Nations, 258, 296, 302,
304, 307-308
Leake, A. H., 206
Lebedew, P., 46
Le Bosquet, J. E., 151
Lecky, W. E. H., 150-151
Le Dantec, F., 50, 149-150
Leduc, S., 50
Lee, F. S., 93
Leitch, J., 218
Life, 26; theories of origin, 49-
50; physico-chemical basis, 55,
342-343
Lippmann, W., 151, 250-252
List, F., 234
Livingstone, W. P., 164, 255
Loeb, J., 66
Loeb, L., 342
London, sanitary evolution, 122
Lorentz, H. A., 21-22
Lull, E. a, 44, 50, 56, 58, 339
Lumber industry, 182-183, 195
Lusk, G., 106
Lynching, 284-285
Madagascar, 260-261
Maize, 100
Malaria, 125, 323
Malthus, 232-233
Man, evolution, 59, 141; heredi-
ty, 69-73; environment, 72-76;
mental adjustment, vii-viii, 77'
79; physical adjustment, 88-
90; developing food supply, 95-
103; control of health, 105-
115; of providence, 116-129;
moral adjustment, 42, 144, 164
167, 171, 173, 175, 228-229,
248, 294, 309, 311, 314-315,
322-323 ; as partner in creation,
313-314; as object of creative
process, 317; future social de-
velopment, 318; future of in-
dividual, 318-319; slow social
adjustment, 320-321; marks of
progress: lengthening of hu-
man life, 323-324; democratic
movement, 325; social solid-
arity, 326-328
Mandatories, 258
im>EX
355
Marot, H., 206
Mars, 48
Marshall's Microbiology, 98, 102,
106, 123
Materialism, vii, 20-23, 28, 312
Mathews, A. P., 106
Matter, electrical theory of, 20-
23 J theological problem, 29, 31,
312
Mauritius, 256, 262
Mayo, W. J., 120-121
McDougall, W., 69, 297
McManigal, O., 188
McNamaras, 188
McPherson, J. B., 186
Meat-packing combination, 148
Medicine, surgery, 106-107;
chemistry, 108-109; bacteriol-
ogy, 109-111; mental hygiene,
112-115; prevention of disease,
120-126
Mendel 's Law, 53
Men's Garment industry, 137,
202, 224-225
Mental hygiene, 106, 112-115
Metchnikoff, 111
Migration, Negro, 288-289, 292
Miles, H. E., 205
Milk, 96-98, 123
Milky Way, 44-45, 337-338
Millikan, R. A., 20
Millioud, M., 245-247
Milner, A., 272-273
Minchin, E. A., 50
Minimum wage, 199
Minkow^ski, 24
Minnesota Experiment Sta., 99-
100
Mitten, T. E., 218-220
Monism and Pluralism, xix, 65,
77, 94, 105, 313
Montefiori, C. G., 4
Moore, B., 50
Morgan, T, H., 26, 52, 66, 234,
342
Morman, J. B., 159
Morocco, 251, 265, 295, 307
Morris Plan banks, 158
Morris, Wm., 91
Morse, J., 287
Mote, C. H., 199
Moulton, F. R., 44
Mt. Wilson observatory, 337
Mozart, 85-86
Miinsterberg, H., 77, 106
Murphy, E. G., 286-287
Music, 84
Mutations, 52-55, 70, 234, 341-
343
Mysticism, 32-33, 41-42
Natal, effect of British rule,
278-279; treatment of natives,
279-281
National Erectors* Association,
187-188
National Industrial Conference
Board, 199, 218
Nationalism, economic, 235, 244,
248; racial, 270-271, 281, 287,
328; political, 263, 272-274
National relations, contrasting
theories, 232, 248-249, 294
Natives, treatment of, 252-257;
in Natal, 279-281
Natural Selection, 52-54, 232-234
Nature, Jesus' view of, xvii, 3-
4; man's communion with, 35-
38; symbolism, 39-40; mysti-
cism, 41-42; uniformity of, 51,
87-88 ; cooperation with, 66, 88-
90; contact with, in manual
labor, 91; in agriculture, 103
Nearing, S., 178
Negro, 93; in tropics, 254-257;
in Southern states, 282-283;
sex relations, 283; lynching,
284-285; civil jusftice, 286;
effect on whites, 286, 293; ra-
cial tension, 287; migration,
288-289; education, 290-291;
agriculture, 291; public health,
291; purchasing power, 292;
and organized labor, 292
Neill, C. P., 186
Netherlands, 37; colonial policy,
258, 278; in Java, 274-278
Neurones, 72, 80
New Jersey Bureau of State Re-
search, 218, 224
New York City, 118-119, 137, 194,
221-223, 225
New Zealand, 199n, 270
Olivier, S., 254-257, 285
Olsen, J. C, 123
Open door, 261-263
Oppenheim, L., 306
Osborn, H. F., 50, 56-57, 59,
345-347
Osier, W., 106
356
INDEX
Packard Motor Co., 204
Paleontology, 58, 346
Palgrave, F. T., 36
Panama Canal, reduction of
death rate, 121
Pan-Germans, 235-236, 240, 248
Panspermism, 47, 49
Parables, Jesus' use of, 2
Parker, C. H., 75, 183
Parmelee, M., 69
Patriotism, as altruistic, 139-140
Patten, S. N., 324
Paul, 68, 134, 298
Pearl, E., 119-120
Pearson, K., 71
Persia, 251, 265, 295
Perugino, 41
Peters, J. G., 117
Pfluger, E., 50
Pharisaism, 4-5
Philadelphia Eapid Transit Co.,
218-220
Philanthropy, 151, 325
Philippines, TT. S. in, 257
Physics, electrical theory of Mat-
ter, 20-22; relativity, 23-25
relation to Biology, 26, 55
uniformity of Nature, 87-88
cooperation with Nature, 90
Piez, C, 192
Pigou, A. C, 203
Pillsbury, W. B., 77
Pirrson and Schuehert, 44
Planetesimal hypothesis, 339
Planets, habitable, 47-49, 339-340
Plants, evolution, 56, 345 j breed-
ing, 53-54, 99-101, 341
Poetry, landscape in, 35-36, 40
Popenoe and Johnson, 69
Population, theory of, 232-234;
emigration, 251, 300-301; Java,
276-277; Natal, 278
Porteus, S. D., 71
Pragmatism, viii, 149, 236, 323
Pratt, J. B., 163
Prayer, in Jesus* teaching, 11;
cooperative basis, 167-172;
answer to, 170; social value,
171-172
Prendergast, W. A., 158
President 's Industrial Commis-
sion, 199, 209, 226
Preziosi, G., 240-241
Price, G. M., 196, 222
Primates, 57, 59
Profiteering, 229
Profit sharing, 197-198, 212
Prostitution, 69; control, 127
Protocol, 221-223
Protozoa, 56, 345
Providence, in Jesus* teaching,
10-11; man's control of, 116;
fire, 116-119; health, 119-121;
accident, 121; sanitation, 122-
125; disease, 125-126; prosti-
tution, 127; alcoholism, 127;
famine, 128; meaning of con-
trol, 133, 168, 324
Psychology, 77; concepts, vii,
77-79; mind and brain, 26, 80;
the subconscious, 80-83, 86;
aesthetics, 84-85
Public health, 120-126; in South,
282-283, 291; as international
problem, 294-296
Punett, E. C, 52
Putnam-Weale, B. L., 269
Eace, 70, 263, 270, 282, 328
Eankin, M. T., 199
Eausehenbusch, W., 28
Eeclamation and drainage, 102
Eed Cross, work in Europe, 128;
in American communities, 139;
international, 296
Eedfield, W. C, 200-201
Eeichert, E. T., 342
Eeinsch, P. S., 252, 261, 294
Eelativity, 21, 23-25
Eeligion, viii, xvii; and Sci-
ence, 27-32; dualism, 29-30;
biological significance, 30; re-
lation to sex, 68; to labor, 90-
92; to agriculture, 103; to
health, 113-115; to character
building, 161-164; as interna-
tional force, 297; place of
Christianity, 311; pragmatic
value, 322-323; change of tone,
323-324
Eenaissance, 36
Eetail trade, modern evolution,
146-147
Eettger, L. F., 112
Eevolutionary propaganda, 183,
185-186, 194, 325
Eichardson, O. W., 21
Eitter, W. E., 66
Eobinson, W. J., 69
Eochester, N. Y., 123
INDEX
357
Rockefeller Poundation, 125-126,
296
Rockefeller, J. D., Jr., 181, 215
Roe, J. W., 159
Romanticism, 37
Rosenau, M. J., 106, 123
Rotary Club, code of ethics, 156
Romnania, 139
Rowntree, B. S., 178, 203
Rubinow, I. M., 203
Rucker, W. J., 195
Russell, H. N., 336, 338
Russia, 139, 194, 293, 325; war
with Japan, 237; in Persia,
265
Ryan, F. M., 187-188
Safety engineering, 121, 203
St. Thomas, 255
Sanders, A., 96
Sanitary Control, Board of, 222
Sanitation, 122-126, 283
Sayre, F. B., 294
Schafer, E. A., 50
Schechter, S., 4
Schuchert, C, 44, 58
Science, inductive method, vii,
1, 32, 175, 227; and Religion,
27-32, 322-323
Scientific Management, 201-203
Scott, E. J., 289
Sedgwick, W. T., 123
Seligman, H. J., 287, 292
Senancour, E. P. de, 42
See, T. J. J., 43-44, 47
Serbia, 139, 305
Sex, 67-68; relations in South,
283-284
Shadwell, A., 244
Shantung, 267-268
Shapley, H., 44-46, 336, 338
Sherrington, C. S., 77
Shop committees, 217-220
Sidis, B., 77
Slessor, M., 163
Slesvig, 271
Slichter, S. H., 203
Small, A. W., 80
Smallpox, 125-126
Smith, Adam, 176, 235
Smith, G. E., 59
Smith, R. H., 155
Social insurance, 203, 327
Socialism, materialism, 28; and
production, 206 j in needle
trades, 225; German, 235; in-
ternational, 303
Society, not an organism, xviii,
316; solidarity of, 11-12, 316-
317, 326; as viewpoint, 152,
309, 325
Soil improvement, 101-102
Solano, E. J., 305
Sommerville, D. M. Y., 25
South Africa, 256, 270; treat-
ment of natives, 255, 278-281
Spargo, J., 207
Species, origin of, 52-55, 341-
343
Speech, 72, 78
Spencer, Herbert, 82-83, 86
Sport, 91; international, 297
Starbuck, E. D., 163
State, German theory of, 234-
235; economic nationalism,
236, 244, 248
Stoddard, L., 256, 263
Stoddard, W. L., 218
Stotesbury-Mitten plan, 218-220
Subconscious, 77, 80-82; training
of, 83
Suggestive therapeutics, 106, 112-
115
Superman, 70, 317
Surgery, 106
Switzerland, 241, 300
Tarbell, I. M., 196, 207
Tariff, protective, 236, 244-246,
248; preferential, 236, 252,
259-261, 263, 270; anti-dump-
ing, 246; wars, 300; bargain-
ing, 300
Taxes, German, 242-243 ; for colo-
nization, 257; of colonies, 261;
of natives, 256, 272, 275-277,
280
Taylor, F. W., 201-202
Tead, O., 210, 228
Tead and Metcalf, 178, 218
Teleology, 52, 54, 56, 316
Terman, L. M., 70, 74
Textile industry, 183-186, 261-
262
Thayer, W. R., 151
Thomas, A., 305
Thompson, C. B., 202
Thompson, D. W., 343
Thomson, J. J., 21
Thomson, W. M., 73
358
INDEX
Thorndike, E. L., 73
Tolman, E. C, 21-22
Training department, 204-205
Troland, L. T., 21, 50
Tropics, control of, 250, 263
Tuberculosis, 124-125
Tufts, J. H., 85
Turkey, 264, 295, 306
Twenty-one Demands, 268
Typhoid fever, 123-124
TJnderhill, F. P., 343
Unemployment, 203, 248; inter-
national, 299, 303-304
TJnited Mine Workers, in Colo-
rado strike, 178-181; contract
with Victor American Fuel Co.,
216
United States, in Philippines,
257; in China, 266-267
U. S. Steel Corporation, 147,
187
Usher, A. P., 178
Veblen, T., 238, 245-246
Verrill, C. H., 199
Vertebrates, 57, 346-347
Victor American Fuel Co., 216
Vocational training, 74-75; 205-
206, 210
Waddle, C. W., 69
Wallace, A. E., 47-48
Wallas, G., 151
Wanamaker, J., revolution in
business methods, 146; state-
ment of principles, 147
War, 121; America's part in,
140; practical futility of, 236-
237; competition in arma-
ments^ 239-241; cost, 242-243;
Canada's part in, 270; effect
on Egypt, 273-274; on Negroes
in U. S., 287-288; on world
trade, 299; change in moral
standards, 327
War Labor Board, 199-200, 217,
219
Washington lumber industry, 181-
183, 195
Washington, B. T., 93
Water and sewage purification,
123
Watson, D. M. S., 56
Watson, J. B., 69
Webb, S. and B., 178
Welfare work, 196-197
Wells, H. G., ix, 165
West, G. P., 181
Weyl, W. E., 151
Wheat breeding, 99-100
Wheeler, W. E., 269
White, A. D., 28
White, W. A., 106
White, W. F., 286
Whitman, Walt, 41
William II, 235, 241, 264
Williams, J. E., 216
Williams, W., 211
Willys-Overland Co., 197
Winslow, C. H., 222
Wolf, E. B., 213-215
Wolff, H. B., 159
Woodruff, L. L., 49-50
Woolf, L. S., 294, 297, 303
Work, M. N., 291
Wright, q. D., 178, 180
Yellow fever, 126, 295
Zinsser, H., 106
Zulus, 278-281
o^
•ru.^
i,A.si
D/^l^
1T5J^
toO^
XS^^JlrB^X^O^^
o?25_:„^o«H
^--oro^^-j'o^c^jsn---
FOT^ ^ «ue T^^J^oU^f^
D^^
th^
^^^lootn-
^ ^/^D6
/'
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY