UUlU|UHitlMUlluiHMmHHumiUHWUiwHMUi«»imiii»HunuinwnHH(iifwwuK(#j>iniiitfHi»iiMMiinuu t"r.' ( t intff t iWl ll
  • l trr»n « »>t Wi:wT tTtf«Th'ttTtfrTrtTtrtnH^ intntiiiifMr^itoiHiiit.HfixiniilHUlUUriUlf)**' Digitized by tine Internet Archive in 2007 with funding from IVIicrosoft Corporation http://www.archive.org/details/chaoscosmosOOheerrich CHAOS OR COSMOS? CHAOS OR COSMOS? BY EDGAR L. HEERMANCE NEW YORK E. P. BUTTON & COMPANY 681 FIFTH AVENUE 1922 COPTRIGHT, 1922, BY E. P. DUTTON & COMPANY All BighU B^&erved i •* *^' /^9 IPrlnted 1b the Vnltod States of Amexloa To N. K. L. H. COMRADE AND COLLABORATOR 4865 i PREFACE Is the world in which we live a chaos, a welter of blind forces and brutish passions ? Or is it a cooperative enter- prise, through which Man and God are slowly working out an order of justice and brotherhood ? That is the question men are asking, with an impor- tunity no previous age has known. We are coming to distrust Materialism. As a philosophy of life, it has been stifling moral and religious forces that are essential to progress. It oifers no hope for the future. Selfishness spells exploitation and class struggle. The idea of the survival of the strong brought our generation to the World War and its terrible aftermath. We have been passing through a period of intellectual panic. Many current theories of the world have gone into bankruptcy. What is to take their place ? The relation of man to the Universe must be approached today in the attitude of the scientist. For the modem mind, knowledge is not something fixed and final, but a series of approximations. Some men still take their opin- ions on authority. Abstract philosophers continue to treat ideas as if they were the only realities. In this book we shall make inductions from the concrete facts given us by science and human experience. Though not a biologist, my studies have compelled me to take the biological point of view. Man is an organ- ism ; his life, physical and mental, is a process of adapta- tion. To reverse Descartes' dictum: I think, therefore Something is, to which my mind is seeking to adjust itself. And that Something is the vast external Universe, which forms my environment. It is of little importance to know the exact source of our ideas. They may be built up out vii viii PEEFACE of sense impressions ; they may be due to revelation or to some special intuitive faculty. The real question is, what our ideas are good for, how far we can use them to know our Environment and control its forces. All fruitful thinking is a form of biological adjustment. What we call Truth and Certainty are the degree of our success. That truth is a matter of utility is the ruling principle of what is known in the philosophic den as Pragmatism. One weak point in the work of this school should be cor- rected. It has had no criterion for judging whether an idea has practical value, it gave no valid reason why a theory is true because it works. There is a biological test and a biological reason. Whatever in our experience, or in the arranging of our experience, constitutes a genuine adaptation to the Environment, is true to that extent. Science and Philosophy, Religion and Ethics, are phases of the same fundamental process. They represent our human attempts to know the world and fit ourselves to its conditions. Any experience, idea or theory which enables us to do that successfully, has a survival value. Our method carries us one step further. The conditions which determine man's adjustment in its various aspects, should throw light on the nature of the Universe. We must adapt ourselves to a particular kind of world. What is that world ? For an answer to this question, it is not enough to inters rogate the astronomer or the biologist. Our survey must be as broad as life itself. A certain foreshortening in my treatment is thus explained. Much more space is given to those problems which involve man as a social unit. The earlier chapters on the natural sciences are necessary for a proper perspective, but they have been kept within a brief compass. In order to do this, I have assumed some familiarity with recent scientific progress. Detailed re- views and discussions, given in my former book on The Unfolding Universe, have not been repeated. To a cer- tain extent the present volume covers the same ground. PREFACE ia But from an entirely different angle. Then, in seeking to understand the Universe, we led up through the Phys- ical, Organic, and Psychological fields, to the explanation given by Religion. In this book we take the Christian religion as a working hypothesis, and test it by application to the Universe of our daily experience. Our survey, after the opening chapters, takes on the character of a pilgrimage. We pass through various regions of human activity, stopping long enough in each to apply the hypothesis of a cooperative and moral Uni- verse. The aim is to gain an interpretation of man's world taken as a whole, which may serve as a basis for social ethics. For this purpose a horizontal treatment is necessary. We cannot follow the vertical treatment of the historian. The function of History is to serve as the testing ground for ethical theories, rather than their source. Mr. Wells' excellent Outline, for example, was preceded by a long series of social studies. He had drawn conclusions as to the meaning of what man is doing, long before he tried out these conclusions through a study of what man has done. Unless one has a solid basis of ethical theory, the reading of History is largely meaningless. I have tried to select material that is most obvious and unquestioned, avoiding controversy, speculation and pre- diction. If any one wishes to do battle with me, it must be on the ground of what the material means, the induc- tions to be drawn from it. I offer no apology for using the records of dairy cows or the elimination of yellow fever at Guayaquil as evidence on a problem in Philos- ophy. In studying national behavior, the attempt is made to secure completed reactions of recent date. For indi- vidual and industrial relations I have taken my examples from America, where they could be studied at closer range. Those living in other countries may cut off similar cross sections of our common world. If the tone of an Amer- ican writer is more optimistic, a less clouded sky may give a clearer observation. X PREFACE We shall study social experiences because of the bearing they may have on the character of the Universe. Our immediate concern is with principles rather than with programs and applications. It will be well for the reader to keep this distinction in mind. I realize how inadequate is the treatment of many questions. This is due to the necessity of keeping a balanced discussion of so wide a field, as well as to my own limitations as a student. I have sought to atone for it to some extent bj concreteness, and by adding suggestions for further reading. In addi- tion to the works cited in the text, many of the more important chapters contain selected reference lists. Books are chosen which give standard treatment from various angles, and full bibliographies. I venture the hope that many readers may be stimulated to follow the subjects I have briefly sketched. They may thus gain something of the zest of discovery which has been mine through the studies of many years. If I fail to discuss many philosophical or theological problems, it is not because I consider them uninteresting, or unimportant, or incapable of inductive treatment, but simply because they do not fall within the scope of this book. The most notable omission is the question of Per- sonality. Just what human personality is, and how far human analogies may be used to describe the God with whom men are in relation, is a large and complex problem. I do not mean to beg the question, but merely to postpone it, for full discussion in a later volume. When an author has the Universe on his shoulders, he may be pardoned for not carrying more of the load than is absolutely necessary. The rapid progress of Science during the past few years makes it necessary to correct some of my former state- ments of fact and interpretation. This is especially true in the fields of Astronomy and Biology. The scientific material on which our discussion is based is given in more detail in the Appendix. An appendix, like a footnote, is not intended to be read by people in general. It is a PREFACE xi morsel thrown out to the advanced student, to divert him from criticizing the statements in the text. My book is a series of sketches. A volume could be written on the subject of each chapter. In some cases a whole library is at our command, as I know only too well. 1 have not sought to strip the countryside of flowers, but to gather samples of the most characteristic. The reader might prefer another selection or arrangement He may object to some of my attempts at botanizing. But the flowers are from Nature herself; he may not criticize them. If we do not like the facts of the Universe, we may shut our eyes ; but the facts are still there. E. L. BO. 'Nbw Haven, Conn., December 15, 1921. CONTENTS Introduction xv I. Preliminary: Jesus' View of the Uni- verse 1 A Statement of the Christian Hypothesis. PART I. THE EXTERNAL UNIVERSE. Problem a. Is the Universe Material or Spiritual? II. The Passing of Physical Materialism . 19 III. God Restated 38 IV. Man's Communion with Nature ... 35 Prohlem h. Is Our Planet Unique? V. The Earth and the Universe .... 43 Problem c. Was the Evolution of Ma/n> Accidental or Natural? VI. The Universe Unfolding 52 PART II. THE RELATION OF MAN TO THE UNIVERSE. Problem d. Monism or Pluralism? VII. The Making of Man .... VIII. Building the World of Thought IX. Completing the Physical World X. Developing the Food Supply XL The Control of Health . . . XII. Shaping the Course of Providence jdii 65 77 87 95 105 116 xiv CONTENTS PAET III. THE MORALITY OF THE UNIVEESE. Problem e. Is the Universe cm the Side of Righteous- ness and Goodwill? Section 1. INDIVIDUAL RELATIONS. XIII. The Place op Altruism 133 XIV. The Higher Selfishness 143 XV. Character as an Asset 153 XVI. The Cooperation of Prayer 167 Section 2. INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS. XVII. Industrial War . 175 XVIII. Attempted Remedies 195 XIX. Democracy in Industry 211 Section 3. NATIONAL RELATIONS. XX. National Aggression 231 XXI. Colonies and Trade 250 XXII. The Treatment of Other Peoples . . .264 XXIII. The Color Line .282 XXIV. The Growth of Common Interest . . . 294 XXV. The Future 311 Appendix A. Index to Bible Passages in Chapter I 331 Appendix B. Recent Progress in Cosmogony . . 334 Appendix C. Habitable Planets among the Stars 339 Appendix D. The Emergence of a New Species 341 Appendix E. Chemistry and the Organism . . 342 Appendix F. The Evolution op the Organic Machine 344 General Index 349 INTRODUCTION Man is part of a Universe, to which his life is in per- petual adjustment. In it he lives and moves and has his being. The character of that Universe — its laws and forces, its conditions of success and failure — is a matter ^of supreme importance to individuals and nations. Many working theories of the Universe have been pro- pounded. Some of these were direct attempts to explain the world, put forward by philosophers or theologians, or by scientific workers in various fields. Often the theory t was little more than a fixed attitude of mind, an assump- tion as to the world and man's relation to it, a pragmatic creed by which actions were guided. Of these hypotheses, many have failed because they did not account for all the facts. Others furnished no 'sure guide to success in the practical adjustment of men's lives to the world. The theory was discredited because it did not work; the real Universe was different from what was described or as- sumed. A philosopher has argued from false premises, which later cause the structure of his thought to come tumbling down. A scientist has interpreted the Universe from the standpoint of his own studies, and left out of account the equally important contribution of other sci- ences. A ruler ignores moral laws that are as inexorable as gravitation, and ends at Amerongen or the guillotine. A workman revolutionist kills the goose which lays the golden egg. A minister of the gospel pictures the world and man as he thinks they ought to be, not as they really are, and people choose reality. A captain of industry acts on a conception of human relations which makes them mechanical instead of human, and Bolshevism lurks around the comer. The shore is strewn with wrecked XV xvi INTRODUCTION theories. In looking at tlie Universe, it behooves us all to see it straight and see it whole. Like many thinkers, in many lands, I have found my- self turning for guidance to the great Teacher from whom we date our calendar. The Christian religion, as a prac- tical philosophy of life, defines God in terms of Jesus' teaching, and affirms that the Universe is on the side of righteousness and goodwill. Is this true ? Does the Uni- verse really possess such a character ? That is the problem which is before us for solution. The philosophy of Jesus has the right to be tested, like other hypotheses, by experi- ence and experiment. In fact his theory is being tested today, not only by men and women in their individual lives, but by institutions and nations. The result should prove, as far as proof is possible, whether the Universe is Chaos or Cosmos. My book attempts to gather and weigh such evidence. It is intended to be inductive in method and entirely open-minded in spirit. The Christian teaching is accepted as a working hypothesis. To learn how well it interprets the world as we find it — this is the object of our quest The Christian theory of the world is embodied in the teachings of Jesus. [Chapter Jf.] Christ was a law- giver, not in the sense of the legislator who enacts laws, but of the scientist who discovers them. The truth which he found, and proclaimed in the fact of bitter opposition, was that of a Universe essentially spiritual, the manifesta- tion of the ever present Father. This Universe is still unfolding, and its completion requires the active coopera- tion of men. Both as joint creator and as the object of creation, the individual man is supremely important The righteous and loving character of God makes integrity and goodwill, not only the basis of Ethiea, but the clue to practical success. I am increasingly impressed by the philosophy that underlies Jesus' teaching, his interpretation of the exter- nal world in terms of God as Spirit This is more than INTRODUCTION xvii a doctrine of Divine immanence, as commonly understood. For a generation, we have had a growing emphasis among Christian writers on the idea of God in Nature. But Jesus appeprs to me to put it the other way. He does not sink God in Nature. He sees Nature as the direct activity of God. He does not sharply separate the world from its Author or Source. In a sense this is a revival of the older Hebrew attitude. It stands in sharp opposition to the dualism of God and the world which w© find in later Judaism, and in the Latin stream of Christian Theology. So much for our working hypothesis. Now let me out- line the way it will be tested. Part I of our book is de- voted to the Universe as a whole, without reference to the problem of the individual. The antithesis of God and His creation opened an unfortunate gulf between the re- ligious man who emphasized God and the scientist study- ing the material world. Is the Universe, of which we are a part, essentially material or spiritual ? This is the first of the five specific problems w'ith which our book deals. We find a provisional answer [^Chapter 2~\ in the new Physics, with its electrical explanation of Matter. The collapse of physical materialism leaves the field clear for the development of Jesus' idea of God's activity in Nature. This conception of a dynamic Universe is common both to recent Science and to the Christianity of Jesus. IChap- ter ^.] The idea of God emerges from the vagueness of speculative philosophy and practical dualism. If we see Him at work in Nature, arguments to prove the existence of a Divine Being become superfluous. Religion, in its historic development, is seen as part of man's reaction to the world in which he is placed, his attempt to adjust himself to the Environment and come into practical rela- tions with it. I call special attention to this conception of Religion, which I regard as of the greatest practical and theoretical importance. The recent attempt of Durkheim, Overstreet and others to identify God with Society, is mere theoriz- xviii mTRODUCTION \ ing. "Society" is an abstraction; it has no concrete ex- istence outside of the individuals who compose it. Man, in his religious experience, appears to be dealing with concrete realities, many of them definitely grounded in his physical environment. He undoubtedly projects him- self on the Universe. The view he takes of God is shaped by current social concepts.^ But no one who studies the history of Eeligion from the biological standpoint, would be likely to develop the Society-God theory. One is led rather to the Environment-God hypothesis which I have given. There is much truth in Leuba's statement that "God is not known, he is not understood ; he is used." I leave undetermined the theological question of the relation between God and the extra-human Universe. The whole problem of Personality, human and Divine, I hope to discuss in a later book. For our present purpose the question is not material. What we want to know is whether we live in a Chaos or a Cosmos. I merely adopt Jesus' point of view, as I interpret it, and regard the Universe as one of the forms in which God reveals Him- seK to men. Christ teaches us to look on the external world, not as so much Matter or Force, but as itself a manifestation of the God he interprets to us, and with Whom he brings us into practical relations. This position makes the Divine Being more definite and real than where one holds to a sharp dualism of God and the world. At the same time it brings Religion, Science and History onto a common plane, where relation and logical induction are possible. If, at some points in the book, I appear to iden- tify God and the Universe, this use of language is intended as rhetorical rather than philosophical. To resume the thread of my argument, Man in his com- munion with JSTature [Chapter U, a breathing spell from intellectual problems], has found therein a solace, a spir- itual symbolism, and a mystical exaltation. *See my Unfolding Unwerse, chap. 18, The Social Stages of Re- ligion. IKTRODUCTION lix Our idea of the Universe has been enormously expanded by modem Astronomy. IChapter 5.] This introduces a question Ox proportion, with regard to the earth and man. IProhlem &.] The external world is still a unity. And in this larger perspective, human life retains its intrinsic value. The evidence at hand leads us to reject the possi- bility of other inhabited worlds, from which the life of our, planet might have been derived. We are thus thrown back on the current scientific conception of life, as a more complex development of the phenomena which we know as physical. This position is in harmony with Jesus' idea of Matter as an expression of God's activity. The long evolution of life on our planet culminates in the appearance of Man. [Chapter 6.] Was this a cosmic accident, or was it a natural result of the forces involved ? In other words, are we to accept the Christian postulate of a definite goal in Creation? IProhlem c] The facts do not bear out the idea of Ged as an Engineer operating upon a world entirely distinct from Himself. Recent Biology, however, appears entirely consistent with a dy- namic Universe unfolding from within. In Part II we take up the question of the Individual. Is the Universe a strict Monism, in which the individual human being is submerged? Or, as Christianity affirms, has the Monism of the extra-human world become a Plur- alism, a Republic of cooperating wills? [Problem d.~\ This problem is of so much practical importance, in view of certain tendencies toward philosophical absolutism and religious pantheism, that considerable space is devoted to it. We waste no time discussing such abstract questions as the nature of the will, or freedom versus determinism. Taking man as an organism, in constant interaction with the Universe which forms his Environment, we merely ask what difference he is able to make in the net result. Man's part in Creation is sketched, and the nature of various human functions and activities. [Chapters 7 to 12,'] We find cumulative evidence that man, in his men- XX INTRODUCTION tal life, is not a part of God, but rather a unit actively cooperating with God. Part III deals with the problem of Morality. Is the Universe to which man is seeking adjustment, and with whose forces he is cooperating, to be considered as right- eous and beneficent ? [Problem e.] Here again the evi- dence is sought in the concrete rather than the abstract. Section 1 covers Individual Relations. [Chapters IS to 15.'] Through a study of human behavior we seek to determine the conditions in society which bring to the individual the most favorable reaction. A review of per- sonal and business relations shows that man is succeeding in proportion to his recognition of character and mutual service. Altruism, in the sense of trust and goodwill, is seen to be an outgrowth of natural human instincts, which form the basis of our social and economic life. Similarly, self-control, honesty and justice must be regarded as com- munity assets. Jesus appears to be justified in extending honor and goodwill from narrower groups to society as a whole. His conception of the laws and conditions of the Universe is thus confirmed. Human society becomes a higher form of cooperation between men and God, which finds expression in the Christian conception of Prayer. [Chapter 16,] This idea of righteousness and goodwill as expressing the character of the Universe, must be tested in the field of broader human relations. The case method of Be- havior Psychology enables us to study modem Industry objectively and without conscious bias. [Section 2, Chap- ters 11 to 19.] Our object is to determine the industrial conditions which have produced the most favorable physi- cal and moral reaction on the part of the worker. The failure of exploitation, whether on the side of Capital or Labor, and the success that has followed experiments along the line of common interest, give strong confirmation to Jesus' interpretation of the world. In applying to the life of Nations [Section S, Chapters INTRODUCTION xxi 20 to 23'] the same psychology of Behavior, we are break- ing ground in a new field. The brief study which we are able to make of national aggression, colonial management, and the treatment of other peoples, indicates reactions parallel to those in the industrial group. This result, even if only tentative, is of the greatest importance. From a pra9tical standpoint, the object of a nation must be to act so as to secure favorable reactions from other nations or from subject races. Turning to theory, we see that there are moral laws of the Universe, which, like the laws of mechanics or the laws of health, may be learned through experience and experiment. And these laws apply to nations as well as to individuals. The growth of commerce has brought a rapid unification of the world. \_Chapter 2Jf,'] In national relations, whether official or unofficial, the Christian principle of common interest finds increas- ing application. Summing up the evidence. [Oi^ap^er 25], we find that the Christian attitude toward the Universe is essential to modern civilization. Social progress is an achievement rather than an evolution. Through a slow and painful struggle, the race is learning to adjust itself to its Envir- onment. The advance which has come through man's knowledge and control of physical forces, only brings into sharper relief his relative failure to know and control the moral forces of the Universe. The true function of the individual is found in his position as an independent and cooperating unit. He is partner in a democratic cosmic enterprise. And the objective of the age-long cooperation between Man and God is the developing of human per- sonalities. Promise of advance along this line is seen in the lengthening of human life, the spread of democracy, and the social solidarity introduced by the Industrial era. And now, having spread out the menu, and as I trust whetted the reader's appetite for what is to follow, let us on with the dinner. CHAOS OR COSMOS? CHAOS OR COSMOS? peeliminary: jesus' view op the universe When the scientist faces a problem, he forms a working hypothesis, and tests this by further observation and ex- periment. In considering the question of Chaos or Cos- mos, I propose to follow the same method. We shall start with the idea that the Universe is an ordered Cosmos. To make the idea more definite, let us take as its repre- sentative the consistent and thorough-going statement found in Christianity. The present chapter will develop this hypothesis in some detail. In the remainder of the book, we shall be occupied with testing Christianity as a working theory. The place to study the Christian idea of the Universe is at its source. Increasingly there is borne in upon the student the freshness, the modemness of Jesus. Though the imagery of his statement is ancient and Oriental, he seems to think much as we do today. This impression is not merely subjective, or a result of our recovery of the real Christ, beneath the whitewash of dogma. !N'or is it enough to say that the universal form in which Jesus' teaching is cast, has led each age to think of him as mod- em, from its own viewpoint. We think in similar terms, because the world of today is facing many of the same social conditions and problems which Jesus faced in the Roman Empire of the first century. Again, our modem world is largely his creation. The civilization developed 1 2 ,;;,.; l "chaos ob cosmos? in -Europe' since the close of the Middle Ages owes to Jesus many of its formative ideas and emphases. Once more, the progress of the natural and social sciences during the past few years, has confirmed in a striking way certain of Christ's most fundamental positions, as will appear in later chapters. Whatever the source of Jesus' teaching, the Master of men, to whom we trace our Christian civili- zation, must rank as one of the great leaders, not only in Religion and Ethics, hut in Constructive Thought. Jesus was not a philosopher in the professional sense. He was unfamiliar with the methods and teaching of the Greek schools. His interests were practical rather than theoretical. But in working out a program for the better- ment of humanity, he has given us the outlines of a well- rounded theory of the world, an hypothesis capable of practical testing and proof. Questions of literary criticism cause little difficulty. Leaving out parallel passages, probably seventy-five per cent of the material could be rejected, without affecting the net result. Jesus' main principles are found in all our sources. Comparative study enables us to make allow- ance for editorial revision, and for the bias with which his words are reported by one or another. The chief prob- lem is to rid ourselves of preconceived ideas and of theo- logical bias. Some appreciation of Oriental imagery is needed, and a strong sense of humor, since many of Jesus' statements are in the form of droll exaggeration. Follow- ing Jiilicher's warning, the parables must be used pri- marily for the truths they were intended to teach, and only with great reserve for indications of Jesus' attitude on other questions. In many instances we find phrases and images which appear inconsistent with Christ's gen- eral philosophy of life. If correctly reported, he used them either because they were current, and so an excellent vehicle for teaching, or because his thought had not been worked out in logical detail. We are concerned only with the philosophical or social PKELIMINAKY: JESUS^ VIEW OF UNIVERSE 3 aspects of Jesus' teaching. These however made up the bulk of his interest. He talks of God not as Pure Being, but in relation to men. Personal salvation is closely wrapped up with one's part in the Kingdom of God. Jesus assumes a future life, but his immediate concern is with the present life. I distinguish five main principles, around which his teachings may be grouped. 1. The world in which we live is Divine. God is here. We can detect His presence in Nature, and in human life. His rule is a fact of daily experience. Let us look first at Jesus' attitude toward E"ature. His teachings are full of loving references to the natural world, which show how closely he had observed it, how much it meant to him. The sunset, the lightning, the mustard seed, the harvest, the nesting birds, the foxes — these form the basis for his homely parables and figures of speech. Prom the pages of the natural world, Jesus reads the story of the spiritual world. The wind blowing where it listeth is not merely a wind. It tells him of the breath, the spirit of God, coming, going. Sheep on the hillside are more than sheep; they are the poor humans he is trying to shepherd. The branches of the grape suggest the vital relations between men and God. It is to Nature that Jesus turns when he wishes to be alone, alone with God. He seeks out some mountain, some wilderness, some lonely garden. There he wrestles with temptation ; there he renews his strength ; there he agonizes in the crises of his life. Often Jesus takes the disciples with him. "Come away to some wild spot," he says, "and rest awhile." ^ Peter's confession is brought out amid the mountain scenes near Csesarea Philippi. This com- munion with God through God's world appears to have been a habit with Jesus. Not only is the physical world symbolic. Not only is Nature a solace, and its silences the best approach to God. But this natural world itself is God's world, throbbing »Mk. 6:31. 4 CHAOS OR COSMOS? with Divine life, filled with God's activity, revealing the loving Father's thought and care. It is God who adorns the lilies. The sparrows are fed by Him; not one falls to the ground without the Father. For Jesus, as Stapfer has said, the natural world is transparent, and through every part of it, every event, shows the Divine Face. Not an impersonal First Cause. Not an absentee God. But the Father, living, near, beneficent. This attitude toward the Universe has its practical side. Though sharing the limi- tations of our common humanity, the Master does not despair of his daily bread, even when there is no visible means of its coming, shows no fear in the face of the tem- pest on the Lake of Galilee, never sees in Nature anything terrible or cruel. This note is heard frequently in earlier Hebrew litera- ture. Something of the same mystical element was un- doubtedly present in the Pharisaic teaching, at its best,^ But the average pious Jew of Jesus' day appears to have held a dualism of God and His world, which tended to- ward externalism and materialism. God lived above the sky, far removed from the world of His creation. This holy and awful Being, whose very name was too sacred to speak, acted on the world through His "Spirit," "Wis- dom," or other intermediary. His intercourse with men was carried on by angel messengers. God's will was law. And this Law had been revealed in sacred writings, which, by statement or inference, regulated the life of the chosen people in its minutest detail. For the common man, the emphasis, both in worship and conduct, was on the exter- nal and physical. Religion was to him no longer a joy, a good news, but a system of forms and rules, which only the elect few were able to learn or carry out in their com- pleteness. Views as to the future were various and changing. 'See R. T. Herford, Pharisaism, 1912; C. G. Montefiori, Some Elements of the Religious Teaching of Jesus, 1910; S. Schechter, Some Aspects of Talmudic Theol., 1910. PEELIMINAEY: JESUS' VIEW OF UNIVERSE 5 Man's life practically ceased with the death of the body, though the soul was considered to be sleeping, or continu- ing* a shadowy existence of happiness or misery in the underworld. In the Resurrection, however, the body would be revitalized and take part in its old activities.^ The good Jews would reign with the Messiah in a glorified but still earthly Jerusalem.* The godless would be cast into darkness and never-dying fire, either in Jerusalem's city dump in the Gehenna valley, or in some celestial parallel. Further speculation had begun to merge the national hope into a world conflict between God and Satan. Present and future stood in sharper antithesis. With the final victory for the Kingdom of God, the sky and earth would pass away. In their place would come a new order of existence, still conceived as material in many of its fea- tures. The heavenly Paradise, where the saints would dwell with God, was to be separated by a great gulf from the abode of the wicked. As yet the earth remained in the hands of demons and other powers of Darkness, who were the cause of sickness, Roman tyranny, and other human woes. There was little hope of improvement, ex- cept through the intervention of God on a cataclysmic scale.' Jesus' spiritualistic philosophy is in striking contrast. God is Himself the ever-present Spirit, who may be wor- shipped in any place. ^ He sees in secret, and is interested in attitude and motive rather than external forms.'' Jesus makes it clear that moral uncleanness is of the thought, not of the hands.^ Our relations with God are personal ; ^ they are not on a business basis. ^^ He is the giver of •Compare the Sadducees' reduction to absurdity in Mk. 12:18-23. *Matt. 20:21; Acts 1:6. ■See W. Bousset, Relig. des Judentums im neutestamentUche Zeitalter, 1903. An excellent summary is given by G. Hollmann, Jewish Relig. in the Time of Christy Eng. trans., 1909. •Jn. 4:21-24; Matt. 18:19-20. 'Matt. 6:21-37; 6:1-18; Mk. 2:23-27. •Mk. 7:14-23; Lu. 11:37-41. Cf. Matt. 5:27-28. •Matt. 6:1-18. ^oMatt. 20:1-15. 6 CHAOS OR COSMOS? food," of health/^ of life/^ of character,^* of wis- dom. ^^ The test of living is life.^^ Spirit is vastly more important than body.^*^ The only death with which Jesus is specially concerned is the loss of character. ^^ Life will go right on without a break/ ^ future existence being an emancipation of man^s spirit from the limitations which the body imposes. ^^ For Jesus, the kingdom or rule of God is not merely a hope and an ideal, but a present reality. It is at hand,^^ actually among men.^*^ People are pressing into it.^^ The Kingdom is the world's harvest field,^^ the seed of the future,^^ the thing of greatest present value,^^ the first claim on a man's interest.^^ Already it belongs to the receptive in spirit, and to those who have suffered for the great cause. ^^ Jesus recognizes the weaknesses and fail- ures of humanity, in the world as we find it.^^ But his vision of the rule of God already begun, his confidence in its future triumph,^^ has made him the great optimist of history. We find denunciation and plain speaking, on occasion, but no trace of cynicism, or of the censoriousness that so often characterizes the reformer. "Matt. 6:11; Mk. 6:41. "Mk. 9:29. »Jn.* 10:10; 5:40; 14:19. "Matt. 6:13. ^''Matt. 10:19-20. "Matt. 7:15-27. "Matt: 4:4; 6:25; Lu. 12:15; Jn. 3:6. "Matt. 10:28; Jn. 6:63. "Mk. 12:26-27; Jn. 5:24; 8:51; 14:1-3; 11:23-26, a striking contrast with the current Jewish view of resurrection. »Mk. 12:24-25. «Mk. 1:15; Lu. 10:11. "Lu. 17:20-21; Matt. 12:28; 11:11. »Lu. 16:16; Matt. 11:12. «Matt. 13:37-38. "Matt. 13:31-32; Mk. 4:26-29. "•Matt. 13:44-46. "Matt. 6:33. *Matt. 5:3, 10. »Matt. 13:18-30; Lu. 17:1. ••Mk. 9:1; Matt. 26:29; Lu. 10:17-18; 21:27-28. PKELIMmAEY: JESUS^ VIEW OP UNIVERSE 7 With Jesus' sense of God's real presence, goes a joy in living, an appreciation of wholesome physical pleasure, a love of social fellowship, a breadth and fulness of life, which remind us of the Greek religion at its best. Such an attitude is like a burst of sunlight, by contrast with the austerity of John the Baptist, or the cold formalism of the average scribe. ^^ Asceticism appears out of place in Christ's religion. ^^ He recognizes scholarship, and endorses the search for truth. ^^ He shows the true gentle- man's regard for proper conventions.^^ This genial temper made Jesus welcome with people of all classes. Combined with his self -forgetful service, it brought him a personal popularity that often proved embarrassing.^^ 2. Creation is incomplete. The Divine Universe is a thing of slow hut certain growth. This idea of develop- ment is suggested by Jesus in a number of passages. He himself applies it in fulfilling, that is spiritualizing, the Mosaic code.^^ Christianity is a new garment, not a mere patching of the old.^'' The Kingdom of God is like yeast, like the mustard seed,^^ the growing wheat. ^^ To him that hath will be given.^^ God's spiritual order increases like money well invested ; ^^ it represents a gradual achieve- ment.*2 3. This unfolding Universe taJces its character from *God.^^ Jesus represents and reveals Eim,^^ We are left "Matt. 11:16-19; Jn. 10:10; 16:11. '"Matt. 9:14-15; 6:16-18. "Matt. 13:52; Jn. 16:12-13; 8:32. "Lu. 7:36-50; dress, Jn. 19:23; church dues, Matt. 17:24-27. Contrast with fasting, Lu. 5:33-39; ablution, Mk. 7:1-23; Sabbath, Mk. 2:23-3:6. ^ITk. 2:15;" 12:37; 5:24; 1:36-38; Jn. 12:12-19; 6:15. "Matt. 5:21-37; 19:8. "Mk. 2:21. Cf. Matt. 11:11. "Matt. 13:31-33. » Mk. 4 : 26-29 ; Jn. 12 : 24 ; Matt. 13 : 3-9, 24-30. ^Mk. 4:25. «Matt. 25:14-30; Lu. 19:12-27. «Matt. 6:10; Lu. 10:9; 11:20. *»Matt. 6:25-33. **Matt. 10:32-33, 40; Lu, 10:22; Mk. 9:37; Jn. 6:17-47; 14:9. 8 CHAOS OR COSMOS? with a very definite picture of the moral order in the world. God is on the side of integrity."*^ Those who hunger and thirst for righteousness will be satisfied.*^ Purity of thought is the door to God.*^ He stands for justice,*^ for fidelity,^^ for courage,^® for self-control,^^ for honorable peace, ^^ for consideration.^^ The heavenly Father loves, and expects love in return.'** God is not a Despot, but the daily, hourly servant of humanity.^^ He shows special interest in childhood.^® He sympathizes with hunger,^'' with exhausting labor, ^^ with poverty, ^^ with worry and fear.^^ God has compassion on the ignorant and unorganized,^^ on the sick,^^ the handicapped,^^ the sorrowing,^* the sinful.^^ In fact He identifies Himself with human weakness and need.®^ God yearns to save.^^ He expects men to share His sacrifice.^^ Good deeds are an advertisement of the Divine order in the world.«9 God's world is essentially social. Jesus' hope is that «Matt. 5:17-20, 48 j 21:12-13. -Matt. 6:6. «Matt. 5:8, 27-32. «Mk. 7:6-13; Matt. 5:23-24; 23:1-36. ^Lu. 12:35-48; Matt. 25:21. "Matt. 5:10-12; 10:22, 38. *^Matt. 6:21-22. "Matt. 6:9, 25-26. "Matt. 5:7; 6:14-15; Lu. 6:36. "Matt. 22:37-38; Jn. 14:21. "Matt. 5:44-45; 6:25-33; 7:7-11; Lu. 22:24-27. "Lu. 18:15-17; 17:2; Matt. 18:10, 14. "Mk. 8:2; Matt. 25:35. "Matt. 11:28-30. Cf. Mk. 6:3; Jn. 5:17. "Lu. 6:20; Matt. 11:5; 25:36. "Matt. 6:25-34; Lu. 12:4-7; Jn. 14:27. «Matt. 9:36. "Mk. 5:22-34; Matt. 25:36. "Jn. 9:1-39; Matt. 9:27-30. "Matt. 5:4; Lu. 7:13; Jn. 11:33-36. "Matt. 9:10-13; Lu. 7:47-50. "Mk. 9:37; Matt. 25:45. "Lu. 15:1-32. "Matt. 16:24; Jn. 12:25-26. •Matt. 6:13-16. PJRELIMIISrARY: JESUS^ VIEW OF UNIVERSE 9 men may be united with one another and with God.''^ The model prayer is addressed to "our Father," not "my Father." This term itself is full of social suggestion. The sins with which Jesus is specially concerned are those that tend to break up the Divine family: hatred, lust, pride, covetousness, censoriousness, bad influence, selfishness, in- justice. ''^ The "unpardonable sin" is shown by the con- text to be the denial of the spirit of service.''^ God's pro- gram for the world is a social program.''^ The term "King- dom of God" occurs over a hundred times in the gospels, including parallels. Jesus' use of the phrase suggests a republic rather than an absolute monarchy.*^* Religious institutions are of value to the Father in proportion to their value for man.*^^ God's interest, however, is in the individual and not the mass.'^^ Salvation is no national or racial reunion."^^ He feels as the shepherd does toward the one lost sheep out of the flock of a hundred, or the housewife toward the single coin."^^ The very hairs of our head are numbered.''^ The human soul outweighs the whole material world.^° One little child may represent God, as the object of our serv- ice. ^^ The individual will persist after the death of the body.^^ This emphasis in Jesus' teaching corresponds with his own case method. One of the Master's great achievements was his valuation of the individual, not merely as a social unit, but for his own sake, as a child of God. "Jn. 14:15-20; 17:11, 23. "See Matt. 5:21-48; 18:1-9; 23:1-36; 25:31-46. "Matt. 12:22-32. "Lu. 4:16-21; 7:18-23. "Matt. 17:24-26. " Mk. 2 : 27-28 ; Matt. 12 : 1-8. "Matt. 18:5-6, 12-14. "Matt. 8:10-12; Jn. 8:33-44. "Lu. 15:1-10. "Matt. 10:29-31. »Matt. 12:12; vl6: 26. «Matt. 10:42; 18:5; 25:40. "Jn. 5:28-29. Cf, Lu. 16:19-31. 10 CHAOS OR COSMOS? 4. The completion of the world requires the cooperation of the Father and His human sons. At one end of this relation, fruitful living demands close touch with God.^^ Human intelligence depends on God-given intuition.^* He is the source of all possessions and endowments.^^ It is God's Spirit which must change the unsocial man into a good man.^^ On the other hand, human activity and enterprise are essential.^ "^ Deeds are the road to truth, to love, to sta- bility of character.^ ^ Jesus makes the disciples partners in his program.^^ He shares to some degree his remark- able control over natural forces,^^ and over the human body.^^ Faith on the part of the patient is a condition of Divine healing.^^ It is the attitude of trust which gives free access to God's riches and power.^^ Practical social service is expected of every man, in the course of the day's work.^* The realization of God's rule is wrapped up with such human endeavors. ^^ Workmen are encouraged to yoke up with God.^® Providence is cooperative. The man bom blind is not a case of kismet; he was not being punished for his sins or those of his parents. His blindness was there to be cured. It was a defect in God's world which God was eager to see remedied. ^"^ An accident calls for repentance on the part of the community.^^ Increased food supply "Jn. 15:1-8. "Mk. 13:11; Jn. 16:7-13. "Matt. 6:33; 25:14-30. »Jn. 3:3-5; Matt. 12:32-35. •"Matt. 7:7-8. "Jn. 7:17; 14:21; Matt. 7:21-27. "Jn. 17:18; Matt. 28:18-20. •»Mk. 11:20-23; Jn. 14:12; Lu. 10:19. "Matt. 10:1, 8; Lu. 10:9. •"Matt. 9:22, 29, etc. "Matt. 6:25, 33; Mk. 11:22-24. ••Matt. 25:31-46; Lu. 10:25-37; Matt. 10:42. "Matt. 6:10; 10:7-8. "Matt. 11:28-30. •» Jn. 9:1-5. "Lu. 13:1-5. PEELIMINAEY: JESUS' VIEW OF UNIVERSE 11 requires human cooperation.^^ Man has a part in for- giveness/^^ in sweetening human relations.^ ^^ Marriage is a sacred relationship, to be shared by all who are able to share it. The alternative is absolute control over sexual instincts and imaginations.^ ^^ Men will be held respon- sible for wrong moral conditions, particularly in the case of the young. ^^^ Prayer is the recognition of this partnership between man and God in the making of a world. "Our Father, may Thy Kingdom come; may Thy will be done, Thy plans followed, by me and by my brother men." ^^* We do not need to secure God's attention or influence His ^jjjios Prayer is not to give God information. The Father is so close to us that He knows what things we have need of before we ask Him. He wishes us to ask, because asking is a proof of our interest.-'^^^ To pray for other persons means sharing His attitude toward those persons. ^^^ The communion with God in prayer is direct and personal.^ ^^ It is the cooperation of two harmonious wills. When our plans coincide with His, there is no limit to the possibilities of prayer. Whatever we ask in Christ's name, that is in his spirit, we shall receive. ^^^ 5. Because of the character of the Universe and the solidarity of human society, it pays to he brotherly and filial. No man lives to himself alone. Even our daily speech has eternal consequences. ^^^ The world owes its preserva- "'Mk. 6:37-38; Jn. 6:8-9; Lu. 5:4-7. *«»Mk. 11:25; Matt. 18:15-18; Jn. 20:21-23. i*«Matt. 5:38-48. ^'^Matt. 19:3-12; Mk. 10:2-12; Matt. 5:27-32, 8. "»Matt. 18:7-14. *'**Matt. 6:9-10. ^''^Matt. 6:7. ^~ Matt." 6 :'8 ; 7:7-11; Lu. 18 : 1-8. ^•"Matt. 5:44-45; Lu. 23:34. ^"'Matt. 6:6; Lu. 18:9-14. Compare Jesus' own prayers, as given in Matt. 11:25-26; Lu. 22:42; 23:34, 46. ^~Mk. 11:24-25; Jn. 14:13; 15:7. ""Matt. 12:33-37. 12 CHAOS OR COSMOS? tion and its light, or the opposite, to our influence.* ^^ Actions return to us in kind.**^ Mercy and forgiveness are reciprocal.**^ What affects one affects all. Each child of the common Father is taught to pray : Give us this day our daily bread; not. Give me this day my daily bread. "Not simply, Forgive me my sins, the debts I have not paid; but, Forgive us our sins, the sins of our common humanity the world over, which weaken and impoverish us all. Lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil."* Jesus advocates what might be termed the higher selfishness. The great law of human relations is that you should feel toward your neighbor and his interests as you do toward yourself and your own interests, that you should change places with him, in imagination, and treat him as you would have him treat you.**^ Hatred is damning.**^ We are to love our neighbors as ourselves.**'' And to love one's neighbor is simply to make his welfare a common concern.*** To find our life we must lose it.**^ The way to receive is not to grasp but to give. Because to give is to secure the goodwill of those around you, and this in turn will lead to practical and substantial ex- pressions of goodwill.*^^ Jesus teaches the folly of revenge. You never will over- come evil, he says, by further evil, blow for blow, injus- tice for injustice. You only make matters worse. You pile two evils on the back of the community instead of one, take a second angry man out of the ranks of ef- ficiency. To submit to a blow or a personal injustice is ^Matt. 5:13-16; Lu. 11:33-36. Cf, Matt. 18:7-14. «"Matt. 7:1-5; Lu. 6:37-38. "'Matt. 5:7; 6:14-15; 18:21-35. "*Matt. 6:9-13; Lu. 11:1-4. >«Matt. 7:12-14; Lu. 6:31. "«Matt. 5:21-22. "'Matt. 22:39; Jn. 13:34-35. ""Lu. 10:25-37. ""Matt. 10:39. ^Lu. 6:38.* Cf. Mk. 9:41; Matt. 6:31-33. PKELIMINARY: JESUS' VIEW- OF UNIVERSE 13 often better than to resist. There is less provocation for further blows; there are fewer wounds to heal.^^^ The only final remedy for wrong is to admit our enemy or our rival into the order of goodwill. ^"^^ The lust for wealth or power or display, for their own sake, is out of place in God^s spiritual order. Pride is ridiculous, to any one with a strong sense of humor.^^* Covetousness is tragic.^^* A man's life does not consist in the number of things which he owns.^^'^ The standard of living may be raised so high that possession becomes a burden. There are higher values, which cannot be stolen or corroded or eaten by moths, and which may be pr^ served without constant care and worry.^^^ Our heart follows our investment. ^^"^ Jesus himself spurns the temp- tation of easy money. -^^^ For the sake of freedom, he practices the simple life,^^^ and commends it to others.^^** Wealth is full of subtle temptations. ^^^ What does it profit, to gain the whole world and lose your soul ? ^^^ A divided allegiance is impossible; we cannot serve God and Gold.^^^ Money may prove an impossible handicap, to one seeking character, usefulness and happiness. ^^* Human rights transcend the rights of property. ^^^ The workman has a right to his wages,^^^ and the business man to a reward for i^eoial ability and initiative. ^^''^ Inef- ficiency is a disgrace. ^^^ But the sense of service rendered transcends the pay.^^^ !N'o labor of man or woman need be mere drudgery. ^**^ Fidelity should be a by-product of ^Lu. 6:29-30; Matt. 5:38-42, 21-26. "2 Matt. 5:43-48; Lu. 6:27-36. "3 Matt. 6:2, 16, undoubtedly exaggeration. "*Lu. 12:13-21. "»Lu. 12:15. »»Matt. 6:24. "•Matt. 6:19-20. "*Mk. 10:17-25; Lu. 14:33. "»Matt. 6:21. ««Lu. 8:26-37. »» Matt. 4:8-11. "-Lu. 10:7. «»Matt. 8:20. ^Matt. 25:14-23. ""Lu. 10:40-42. ""Matt. 25:24-30. >«Matt. 13:22. "»Lu. 17:7-10. "»Mk. 8:36-37. ""Lu. 10:38-42. 14 CHAOS OR COSMOS? every business.^^^ All possession involves stewardship. ^^^ The chief value of money is to make friends, not by cor- rupting but by enriching the lives of others.^^^ Failure to do this makes the rich man pitifully and hopelessly poor.^** The most rewarding hospitality is shown to those who can make no retum.^^^ On the basis of brotherhood, Jesus teaches democracy in human relations.^*^ The only aristocracy he recog- nizes is the aristocracy of service. ^^"^ It is those who are modest, and therefore teachable, who have the key to a Kingdom.^*® The honor that comes 'to men is in inverse ratio to their pride. ^^^ Jesus raises woman to a new plane of equality and courtesy.^ ^^ The Kingdom of God is to be world-wide.^^^ Race hatred finds no place with a Jew who makes a Samaritan the hero of one of his stories. -^^^ Caste is equally foreign to his teaching and practice. ^^^ The most menial task may be made a sacrament. ^^^ Hu- man brotherhood transcends the bonds of blood.^^^ Through sacrifice for humanity, one is initiated into a freemasonry of brotherhood, with its own privileges and compensations. "There is no man who has left house, or brothers, or sisters, or mother, or father, or children, or lands, for the sake of the great cause, but will receive a hundredfold, even now in the present life — houses, and brothers, and sisters, and mothers, and children, and ^"Lu. 16:10-12. »«Lu. 12:47-48. *«Lu. 16:1-9. Cf. ministry of beauty, Matt. 26:6-13. *«Lu. 12:16-21; 16:19-31. »«Lu. 14:12-14; Matt. 5:46-47. *«Matt. 23:8-11. "'Mk. 10:42-45; Lu. 7:28. *«Matt. 5:3; 18:1-4. ^••Matt. 23:12; Mk. 9:35; 10:31; Lu. 14:7-11. "»Jn. 4:27; 19:26-27; Lu. 10:38-42. "*Lu. 13:29; Matt. 28:19; Jn. 12:32. «»Lu. 10:33. Cf. Jn. 4:9; Matt. 8:5-13. -Matt. 9:10-11; Lu. 19:5-7; 14:12-14. "•Jn. 13:1-15. "•Mk. 3:31-35. Cf. Matt. 10:37. PKELIMINARY: JESUS' VIEWi OF UNIVEESE 15 lands." ^^® "Happy are the gentle-men, for they will in- herit the earth." ^^^ That is, God's world eventually will come into possession, not of the bully but of the courteous man, who, with all his ability to see opportunities and his shrewdness in grasping them,^^^ is considerate of others' rights and interested in others' welfare. The unsocial man is excluded from God's family as abnormal ; in fact he excludes himself. -^^^ The same doom is pronounced on the unsocial nation. ^^® Service is the inexorable test, which spells destruction to those who fail to meet it.^*^ Here is a theory of human relations that is simple, com- prehensive, self -consistent, and eminently practical. Has Jesus given a correct solution of the riddle of the Uni- verse? Does his interpretation square with the world as we know? Will the theory work? That is the question before us. I propose to use Christianity as a working hypothesis. ^'"Mk. 10:28-30. Cf. Rom. 16:13, "his mother and mine." "'Matt. 5:5. "•Matt! 25:14-30; Lu. 19:12-26. "•Matt. 22:11-13; 18:17; 25:30, 46. "*'Matt. 21:33-43; Lu. 13:29-30. ^Lu. 20:9-18; Matt. 7:24-27. PART I THE EXTEENAL UNIVERSE PAET I. THE EXTEENAL UOTVERSE. II. THE PASSING OF PHYSICAL MATEEIAIilSM. Jesus' spiritualistic philosophy meets its first test as it faces the problem of the external world. Modern Astrono- my has immensely expanded the physical Universe in which man's life is spent. Our great solar system, with its planets in orderly rotation and revolution, is but the vestibule. A billion other suns are distributed through a space so vast that we reckon distance not by miles but by light years. The light from the more distant stars re- quires more than 200,000 years to reach us. Telescope and spectroscope reveal the cyclic changes through which these stars are passing, and have been passing for we know not how many million years. Of this newly discovered world of Astronomy, I shall speak more at length in a later chapter. Suffice it to note here that the physical Universe is one inter-related whole. Suns and satellites, clusters and spirals, nebulae and star dust, are embraced in a single system. Everywhere we find the same forces of gravity and radiation pressure. The rays of heat shot out from one unit, in time reach and act upon the other units. The same chemical elements found on our earth have been detected in the stars. Solids and gases everywhere follow the same laws of behavior. What is the nature of this physical Universe, this vast Mechanism with which man is so closely connected ? Jesus 19 20 CHAOS OR COSMOS? claimed that it is spiritual, dynamic, the vesture and mani- festation of the living and ever present God. Opposed to this is the philosophy of Materialism, which grew up out of the advance in physical Science. Matter itself is the ultimate reality. The Universe is merely an infinite congeries of atoms, unchanging in quantity, constantly entering on new arrangements within a semi-material Space or ^ther, under stress of an Energy which is re- distributed but never altered. As thus stated, the two theories are mutually contradic- tory. But it is possible to bring them onto a common plane. A pure atomism is not held today by any leading scientific thinker. The uniformity of ^Nature, the causal nexus between all phenomena, the laws of conservation — have compelled us to regard the world as a unity. Jesus likewise thinks of the world as a whole. Throughout it reveals the activity and expresses the character of God. Thus Christianity and Science speak of the same "Universe," although in different terms. The question at issue is this: is Matter material, or is it essentially active, or dynamic ? Except for the strain on the imagination, the philosophi- cal problem before us is not affected by the great extension in space and time. The study which will give us the nature of Matter must be intensive. To understand the ultimate structure of a grain of sand or a cubic inch of air, the forces at work and their interaction, is to know the physical Universe in its totality. The most important event in recent Thought is the passing of Materialism, as a philosophy based on scien- tific induction. The age-long problem of Matter has been attacked, and in a measure solved. Modem Physics has taken a position which is entirely consistent with Jesus' theory of a spiritual Universe.^ *A more detailed study of the new Physics will be found in my Unfolding Universe, 1915, chaps. 3 to 5. The best introduction for the general reader is R. A. Millikan, The Electron, 1917, with full PASSING OF PHYSICAL MATERIALISM 21 Materialism was done to death, not by the cloistered student, spinning a web of idealism from his own brain; not by the militant theologian, turning his blind eye to the facts of Science, that he might fight on ignorant and undaunted. The materialistic doctrine, so often put forth in the name of Science, was destroyed through the further study of the scientists themselves. Sir William Crookes began it, in 1870. He had been studying the new cathode rays, formed by passing elec- tricity through a vacuum tube. He made the discovery that the rays consist of minute particles, carrying a nega- tive electric charge. Twenty years later these particles, or electrons, were studied more closely by Professor J. J. Thomson of Cambridge, and others. A series of experi- ments, as brilliant as any in the history of Science, yielded the discoveries which are revolutionizing both Physics and Philosophy. We learned that electrons are the units of the electric current. All flow of electricity, from the flash of lightning to the power generated by turbines and passed through the filament of our electric lamp, is a stream of these tiny particles. We learned further that the solid atom, hitherto the unit of Matter, is composed of elec- trons, and of particles bearing an equivalent positive charge. The units of Electricity are the units of matter : the basis of the air we breathe, of the floor we walk on, of our flesh and bone and blood and brain. Just before the close of the century came the discovery of radium, and of other radioactive substances. Here a references. See also J. S. Ames, Constitution of Matter, 1913; Comstock and Troland, Nature of Matter and Electricity, 1919; Norman R. Campbell, Modern Electrical Theory, 2nd ed., 1913; H. A. Lorentz, Theory of Electrons, 1909; O. W. Richardson, Electron Theory of Matter, 1914. For the earlier Relativity theory, R. C. Tolman, Theory of the Relativ. of Motion, 1917. For the generalized theory, the excellent popular summary by Albert Ein- stein himself, Eng. trans, by R. W. Lawson, 1920; J. Malcolm Bird, etc., Einstein's Theories of Relativ. and Gravitation, Scientific American, 1921; and A. S. Eddington, Relativ. Theory of Oravitor tion, London Physical Society, 1918. (I prefer this to his Space, Time and Gravitation, 1920.) 22 CHAOS OR COSMOS? complex atom is in process of breaking down. As it does so, it shoots forth electrons at enormous velocities. Kauf- mann and Biicherer gave Materialism its mortal wound when they proved that the swiftly moving electron has a larger mass than the electron which is moving with com- parative slowness, as in the cathode ray. That is, part of its mass is not material at all. The inertia of the electron, the apparent solidity of this minute physical body which lies at the basis of all physical bodies, is largely due to its motion, or to the opposing forces set up by its motion. Later researches have indicated that all the mass of the electron is electrical in origin. Physicists find that the connection between mass and velocity is what would be expected, if the entire mass is due to the electric charge. To lose its energy would be to lose its mass. The electron is not a solid particle, as was at first supposed, but a point or region where a definite electric charge is concentrated. The same is probably true of the corresponding unit of positive electricity, very much larger in size, but by no means as well known.. To consider the positive units as other than electrical, is to introduce what Lorentz calls an unnecessary dualism. The working hypothesis of present-day Physics is that "matter is of an electrical nature, and the forces of cohesion between the particles, which give a solid its rigidity, are electrical forces." ^ As another writer puts it, all the properties of matter may be explained as the "statistical result of the behavior of the individual electrons.'' ^ Much work remains to be done in tracing these relations and behavior. The absorb- ing problem of theoretical Physics is that of the arrange- ment of electrons within the atom, and its connection with the radiation of light. But the entire viewpoint has changed. The physical world is not composed, as we used to think, of solid atoms, little pellets of stuff, moving about in groups in an elastic medium known as the -^ther. It *A. S. Eddington, Nature, 101, p. 15, 1918. ■R. C. Tolman, Relativity of Motion, 1917, 15. PASSING OF PHYSICAL MATERIALISM 23 is now thought of as made up of centers of electric force, positive and negative, acting upon each other, and keeping one another in incessant motion. To one accustomed to thinking in terms of an atomic theory, the electrical view of Matter comes as a relief and not as a burden. The dead stuff of a purely physical universe, however Idealism might seek to ignore it, was something of which neither Idealism nor Materialism could give a satisfactory explanation. It remained an irreducible surd in any equation of reality. The New Physics gives us a dynamic Universe. Electron units are active and not merely passive. If any one doubts whether they are active, let him touch a wire along which a stream of them is passing. And a Universe made up of such "live" units is, to some degree at least, self-sufficient and self-explanatory. Then came the doctrine of Kelativity to give Material- ism the stroke of mercy. We must give up even the idea of a fixed medium for physical units. There is good reason for believing that the earth is moving around the sun at a rate of about 20 miles a second. Kepeated at- tempts have been made to detect this motion, with refer- ence to a surrounding ^ther, but absolutely without re- sult. Einstein therefore rejected the idea of any fixed frame of reference. The only motion which can be de- tected is motion of one body relative to another. No such thing as absolute motion is known to us. If an observer and the body whose velocity he is trying to measure are moving uniformly, each has its own space and time. There is no way of directly comparing one system of space and time with another. All we can do is to make a mathe- matical transformation of two sets of space-time coordi- nates. If there are some of my readers who have not even a bowing acquaintance with coordinates, I would state that they are ^e imaginary linesmen stationed along the field to mark the position of the ball on successive downs. Where we have two balls, we must have two sets of lines- 24 CHAOS OE COSMOS? men. By the use of this system it is possible for the mathematical sportsman to follow the games which are being played all over the country. The laws of E'ature, which are given us by our study of Mechanics and Dy- namics, may be stated independently of the observer's particular scheme of space and time. Kecently Einstein has generalized his principle to cover all types of motion. The deflection caused by a field of force, for example gravitation, means the introduction of a new space and time for the deflected body. The deflec- tion is represented by another series of space-time coordi- nates, similar to that introduced for uniform motion. We follow the game, as before, through the reports of imagi- nary linesmen, and it appears to be played in the same way. A man falling from a roof would, during his de- scent, be constructing a new series of space-times, and might not know he had been falling, except for the forces of cohesion in the material which stopped his motion. Einstein's principle was suggested by a case of this sort which came under .his observation. The new theory was able to explain the puzzling dis- crepancy in the advance of Mercury's orbit. A second crucial test was the prediction that the light from the stars, when passing near the sun, would receive a certain amount of deflection through the sun's gravitational attrac- tion. This was brilliantly confirmed by the eclipse expedi- tions of 1919. Momentous consequences follow from this doctrine of Eelativity. That bulwark of Thought, the Newtonian Mechanics, with its assumptions of a fixed and unvarying space, time, mass, etc., is being thrown overboard piece by piece. Mass is equivalent to energy, and increases with velocity. "Space and time in themselves," as Minkowski said, "vanish to shadows, and only a kind of union of the two preserves an independent existence." The ^ther itself, the hypothetical medium for the action of forces, is discarded as being merely a scientific fiction, which ere- PASSING OF PHYSICAL MATERIALISM 25 ates more difficulties than it explains. Or else we rele- gate it to be the mythical abode of Lodge's disembodied spirits. We are no longer troubled about action across empty space, because we have ceased to talk about a space "in which" things move. As a picture of reality, the Geometry of Euclid must go the way of the Newtonian Mechanics. Even while you are representing your objects as cubes and polyhedrons and spheres, the electrons which compose the world have taken a thousand other arrangements. There is no me- dium to retain the form of any of them. We are obliged to construct space by means of moving points and lines, instead of cutting up a space already made. As Sommer- ville puts it, space and matter are inextricably entangled. It is necessary to "build up a monistic theory of the physi- cal world in terms of a single set of entities, material points, conceived as altering their relations with time." * Trained as we have been in the old way of thinking, it is not easy to adjust our thought to a physical universe, whose component parts are constantly changing their rela- tions, and with no material substratum whatever. Our minds grow dizzy. We long for the old world of reality, which appeared to stand still whenever we wanted to ob- serve it. But an adjustment to the "moving continuity" of the new conception is by no means impossible. Our thought soon grows accustomed to the unceasing move- ment. We come to regard reality as a flow, however it may be necessary for the intellect, as Bergson says, to arrest this flow, and represent it as a series of fixed states, like the separate pictures of a cinematograph film. When the modern Kip van Winkle, after a long sleep, returns to the study of Physics, he finds himself in a new world. That world is no longer "material." Pellets of stuff, aether medium, fluid space, alike have vanished. The fundamental fact is these electric charges, with their *D. M. Y. Sommerville, El&ment» of Non-Euolidean Geom., 1914, 201. 26 CHAOS OR COSMOS? properties, their motions, their interactions, their rela- tions and sequences. A mechanical arrangement of pas- sive units has given place to a dynamic Universe. Matter has not disappeared; it cannot be ignored. But it is being stated in terms of Force or Energy.^ This revolution of thought tends to close the gap be- tween Physics and Biology. The organic loses its excep- tional character. The appearance of life on this planet ceases to demand a special creative fiat. More and more the phenomena of Life are being stated in terms of chem- istry. We are able to modify organic processes by chang- ing the surrounding medium. Biologists confidently ex- pect to produce in the laboratory some of the syntheses of physical particles on which the life of the cell depends. What does all this mean ? That Materialism has won the day? Some such fear has haunted many a Christian man in our generation. But physical particles themselves are no longer "material." They are centers of electrical concentration, parts of that unity of interacting centers which we know as the Universe. The mechanist, work- ing forward from the new arrangement of atoms which is characteristic of the organism, and the vitalist, working backward from the behavior of living creatures, find a possible meeting ground in this conception of a world of forces and force-centers, which forms the common basis of Matter and Life. It is not difficult to conceive of an elec- trical atom and a living cell as belonging to the same family. A new grouping of forces may be expected to show new properties, as, to quote an analogy from T. H. Morgan, the properties of sugar differ entirely from the sum of the properties of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen. ■What Force is in itself, as represented by the deflections asso- ciated with an electric charge, is still a matter of debate in the scientific world. To Eddington, for example, both matter and energy are the expression of world curvature. They are part of our per- ception that such curvature exists. {Space, Time and Gravitation, 1920, 92.) Rather than enter on this doubtful region of meta- physics, I prefer to leave "force" and "dynamic universe" as unde- fined terms given us by our observation of the world. PASSING OF PHYSICAL MATEEIALISM 27 The same is true of that higher, more specialized form of life which we call Mind. The human mind uses an elaborate machinery of brain and nerve cells, which itself has helped to organize, and on which its activities depend to a large degree. Mental states are closely correlated with cerebral states. Damage to the brain affects the mind. The destruction of certain centers in the left brain of a right-handed person, means the loss of word-hearing, or of word-seeing, or of word-speaking. But this does not mean that the mind is material, or dependent on what is material. There is no longer any such thing as the ma- terial, in the old sense. The phenomena all come within the field of energetics. The Universe appears to us not only in the comparatively simple groupings of electrons which we find in inorganic chemistry, but in the elaborate molecules which go to make up living cells. These cells in turn, when grouped as organisms, and specialized in brain and nerve cells, reveal properties and powers in the Universe, of which the student of the inorganic world knows nothing. Of necessity the physiologist will empha- size the processes of the brain. The psychologist concen- trates his attention on its properties. But the electron and the albumin molecule, the living cell and the human mind, the neurones of the cerebral hemispheres and the scientist who directs or inhibits them, all fijid their place in a dynamic Universe. Still another gulf has been bridged, between Science and Keligion. A physical Universe of this character, linked as it is with organisms and brain cells, fits into the Christian interpretation of the world. The idea of God will need to be reformulated. But recent Physics and Jesus' conception of God's activity in I^Tature constitute a mutual approach. They meet in a new and comprehensive unity, which calls for another chapter. IIL GOD RESTATED. The passing of physical materialism hreaks the spell of Divine aloofness which Augustine and Aquinas laid upon Christian thought. The Middle Ages passed on to modem Europe a dualism quite similar to that of the Pharisees — God and His creation, Heaven and Earth, Spirit and Matter. Of the two parts of this inheritance, it was the material world which Europe was beginning to study by the new inductive method. One discovery followed an- other. Growing knowledge brought an increasing mastery of the world. Surplus human energies were engrossed by scientific research, by manufacturing and trade. Religion suffered in consequence. With the decay of religious faith during the 18th and early 19th centuries, there came into vogue the materialistic philosophy of the Universe to which I referred in the last chapter. The spiritual realm appeared so remote that men readily listened to the sug- gestion that it was unreal. The effect was far reaching. Two of the most powerful influences of modern times took shape in this era. Science developed a materialistic tra- dition, which was intensified by its conflict with current Theology. Socialism was given its classic expression by leaders who were under the spell of the same anti-clerical and materialistic movement.^ Jesus' idea of God's direct and universal activity had been practically forgotten. As long as men conceived of *See Andrew D. White, Hist, of the Warfare of Science with Theology, 1903; W. Rauschenbusch, Christianizing the Social Order, 1912, 110. However idealistic the modern Socialist may be, he is likely to be a materialist in the type of his thought. 28 GOD RESTATED 29 the world as material, it was necessary to distinguish sharply between God and the world. The two could not be considered akin. The relation in which they stood was that of Creator and creation. And here Christian think- ing faced a dilemma. Either God made Matter out of nothing, a feat which it was almost impossible for the human mind to grasp. Or Matter had always existed, a position that appeared to limit God. The Hebrew tradi- tion, as embodied in the first chapter of Genesis, seems to imply some permanent raw material which God worked np in the course of creation. A third alternative was to Inake Matter an idea or an illusion, which the practical Western mind could not accept. Scientific philosophy, as we have seen, concentrated its attention on Matter, ignoring or denying a Creator. Re- ligion, on what were for the most part valid grounds, con- tinued to develop its doctrine of God. The result was a Tower of Babel. These two branches of human thought came to speak different languages. J^either could under- stand what the other was trying to describe. The Chris- tian charged the scientific man with denying God. The latter regarded the Christian as an obscurantist, on whom the accumulated knowledge of Science made no impression. The effect of this dualism on Religion was equally unfortunate. The material world, with which men have so much to do, was constantly encroaching on the Divine. Every youthful religion has thought of its god as present and active in the world. As the religion grows older, the divinity becomes less immanent and more transcendent. The god who once took a hand in all the affairs of ^Nature and of the community life, now intervenes only in special crises. Once God's activity in the world was direct and personal; now he works only through second causes or through angels. Once he lived in the tree and the spring ; he walked in the garden in the cool of the day. 'Now he dwells in a distant heaven, august, inaccessible. Once he was the intimate of man, his friend and ally, his guest at 30 CHAOS OR COSMOS? the sacrificial feast. Now lie sits on his throne, sur- rounded by courtiers and menials, receiving as of right the flattery and adoration of his earthly subjects. To the average worshipper, at the beginning of the 20th century, the world was real but God was unreal. God's world had pushed God so far away that He appeared to have little to do with our everyday life, ^o figure is more pathetic than that of the sincere Christian of the dualist school, opening his daily newspaper with the lurk- ing fear that God has been disproved. The situation was indeed alarming. Students of So- ciety are beginning to recognize the importance of Re- ligion as a factor in human development. I can only indicate, in the briefest way, its biological significance. In the- earliest cultural stages known to us, we find men seeking to know and ada|>t themselves to their Environ- ment. And this adjustment is largely mental. It takes place in the region of ideas, emotions, values, attitudes. The savage tries to escape from the evil powers which he conceives to be back of the objects and activities of the world around him, and to bind to himself the powers he thinks of as beneficent. Crude as the process seems to us, it was biologically sound and of very great practical utility. We owe to it the beginnings of agriculture, ani- mal husbandry and tEe arts. Human life took on dignity and meaning. Adolescence and reproduction assumed a mystical importance. Religious sanctions were the foun- dation of morality, and made possible the solidarity of the clan or tribe. However much the ideas and forms of Religion have changed in the course of centuries, re- ligious faith retains its essential character. Men still seek to adjust themselves to the Universe, by value-judgments and the establishing of personal contacts. We have noted the tendency in the modem era to separate science and the arts from their original dependence on religion. The verdict of History is that this separation cannot safely be carried beyond a certain point. As we face the ac- GOD EESTATED 31 tivities of the external world, and whatever lies behind them, the attitude of confidence and cooperation has a survival value for the individual or for the social group. Without it, human associations are in the long run un- workable. Religious decadence and general scepticism are a mark of social decay. They might be termed a biological retrogression. Man is less fitted to work with his Environment. The new position taken by physical Science opens the way for a realinement of Christian doctrine. If Matter is dynamic rather than material, it is no longer necessary to say that God is outside of the world which He has made. Such a distinction has lost its value. The world may better be described as the unfolding of God's activity. Creation must be stated in terms of evolution rather than of manufacture. God, instead of being a supreme and perhaps unknowable epiphenomenon, a fifth wheel to the world's onrushing car, becomes known to us in and through our Environment. The way is open for us to recover Jesus' sense of a dynamic, a spiritual world. There is no other. ISTot Matter but Energy is at the basis of the Universa It is the materialist's world of inert stuff, of dead atoms, of fluid space, which proves to be unreal. When the physicist studies the Universe, he is studying God, in certain modes of His action. God Himself, and not one of His creatures or emanations. The theologian is talking about the same great fact. He is trying to de- scribe a spiritual Universe. By the use of other lines of evidence, other contacts and judgments of value, the Christian interprets God as the Divine Parent, whose spiritual order is revealed to our experience through Jesus Christ. Science tells us the way God does His work. Christianity explains the character of the Universe and enables us to make our adjustment more intelligent and fruitful. Science and Religion are thus two sides of the same process of mental adaptation. Each is supreme in its own 33 CHAOS OE COSMOS? field. The function of Science is to describe; the func- tion of Eeligion is to interpret. The scientist must be absolutely free to study the facts of the Universe and report his findings. 'No one else is competent to do so. In its own sphere, Religion must be given the same right of way. For the scientific worker to say that there is no God back of the phenomena of the Universe, would be as presumptuous as for the theologian to deny the atomic theory or the fact of organic evolution. Science may de- scribe the facts of the world, but it cannot interpret the world as a whole. I speak positively on this matter, be- cause for many years I was engaged in what I believe was an honest and competent attempt to interpret the world on the basis of scientific induction. I found that after a certain stage in the enquiry I reached the end of my rope. Induction failed because the data were incomplete. By no conceivable perfecting of scientific method can the situation be remedied. In order to make further advance I was obliged to turn to religion in general, and in particu- lar to the climax of religious development which we reach in the experience of Jesus. He interprets the Universe as expressing the activity of a moral and altruistic God. Our concern is with the value of this idea, rather than with any particular theories as to its source. Philosophi- cally it must be counted as a hypothesis, but no other hypo- thesis is at hand. Either Jesus has given a correct inter- pretation of the Universe, a problem to which the present book is devoted. Or no interpretation is possible; the Universe is a Chaos, without intelligible meaning. To return to my original point, the distinction between the scientific and the religious attitude and method is merely for practical convenience. ITormally the same mind will hold both attitudes and follow both methods. It is only by combining the two that we gain a complete picture of the Universe. The mystic sees God, where other people see only soil and flesh and implements and wood and steel. The differ- GOD RESTATED 33 ence is partly in temperament, partly in the power of imagination, partly in training and intellectual environ- ment. But God is there, in all tiie physical world, what- ever names we give to it. The most matter of fact person is as truly in contact with Him as is the religious mystic or the dreaming poet, of whom our next chapter will have much to tell. Once let the practical man catch that point of view, the point of view of Jesus, and a righteous and loving God begins to be for him a supreme reality, and no longer merely a name or a tradition. The revolution of thought which I have sketched may mean the beginning of a new Christian era. Faith and worship become once more an integral part of life. The religion of Christ, with which our modem civilization is identified, should have in the future a note of reality, a this-worldliness, a practical mysticism, which it has not known since Jesus taught in Palestine. Can God seem distant or unreal when the very food we eat, the clothes we wear, the body that is clothed and fed, are essentially Divine? The physical, as Dearmer says, becomes a sac- rament, the outward and visible sign of a spiritual Pres- ence. Each day is sacred that is lived with Him. Each spot is holy where we meet our God. All functioning of body and brain becomes an act of communion. The natural world takes on new beauty and meaning. Every human activity finds a place in the spiritual order which God and men are making a reality on earth. Yesterday God to the average man was an abstraction. Christian theologians, not yet emancipated from Greek and German philosophy, tended to treat Him as an idea, an Absolute, a bundle of ideal qualities which it was often difficult to translate into the concrete. Today, if we accept Jesus' spiritual interpretation of the world, God is a fact, the great fact of existence, the one thing real in the external world from which there is no escape. In His constant and ordered activity we Jive and move and have our being. Keligion is no longer a 34 CHAOS OE COSMOS? matter of choice. In the broad sense, every man is re- ligious. The atheist and the Christian, the artisan and the astronomer, the physicist and the priest, alike are in con- tact with that ever-present, unavoidable Universe, which the Christian, through his deeper experience, has learned to call the presence of the Father. I do not attempt to state the exact relations between God and the physical Environment. But the two are so close, in our experience, that to ask proof of the existence of God would be to prove the existence of the Universe, which only an occa- sional bedouin philosopher considers necessary. It is evident that our idea of communion between man and God must be given a broader meaning. Intercourse with a Deity who lives up in the sky, is one thing. Inter- course with a God who fills all the world that our senses reveal to us, is quite another thing. In the next chapter, let us consider man's communion with God in !N'ature. IV. Jesus' sense of God's activity in !N"ature was buried for many centuries. Christian thought was pitched in an- other key. Its joy was found in anticipations of a future heaven, rather than in appreciation of the present earth. The world was essentially evil ; the Day of Judgment was at hand. Christians, writhing under persecution, found comfort in the Jewish imagery of the last things. Then apocalypse gave place to asceticism. The ideal Christian life, possible only for the few, was to withdraw from the world and its pleasures, and mortify the flesh for the sake of the soul. In the break-up of civilization during the following centuries, men had no spirit for the enjoyment of JsTature. Augustine's dream is of a city, and that not of this earth. The Greek love and worship of beauty dies out ; the passion for country life, the delight in landscape for its own sake, which we see in Horace and Vergil. Al- most the last echoes of nature-love are found in some charming bits in the Elocutio Novella, and in the descrip- tion of the Moselle by the Christian teacher Ausonius, toward the end of the fourth century. Teutonic thought was cast in a gloomier mold. Land clearing meant a hard and unceasing struggle with natural forces. The forest, which fills such a large place in mediaeval folk-lore, was peopled not by nymphs but by pixies and goblins. Wild nature was not loving but terrible. The recovery of E'ature was not due to the churchmen, whose thoughts were elsewhere, but to the poets. Wan- dering students trill very pagan songs. At the end of the 35 36 CHAOS OE COSMOS? 12th century, Walther von der Vogelweide sings in castle courts of "the flowers pressing out of the grass, early on a May morning, and smiling at the playful sun." A hun- dred years later, Dante has the gift and the leisure of mind to observe the natural world and enjoy it and describe it. Dafydd in Wales paints his lyric pictures of the birds. Petrarch finds in his mountain retreat at Vaucluse, and in his study of antiquity, something of that world of natural beauty which men once knew and were to know again. Chaucer says farewell to his books and his prayers, when Spring comes and he hears the birds singing. The Kenaissance revived the feeling of the Greek and Latin writers toward the natural world, which once more became something it was legitimate to study and enjoy. The movement represented a new energy and broadening sympathies. But it tended, like any revival of the old, toward artificiality. The love of N'ature was an affair of fountains and trim garden walks, of classical imagery and courtly sentiment. Only in England did it become freshly creative. The lyrics of the Elizabethans are spontaneous, overflowing, sometimes even boisterous in their enjoy- ment. The landscape backgrounds of Shakespeare, the more elaborate descriptions of Milton, are equal to the best in classic literature, and with a human feeling which is their own. In England too a cold and symmetrical man- nerism succeeded, for nearly two centuries. But the love of country life, once gained, was never lost, as Palgrave has shown in his quotations from minor poets. ^ In their treatment of !N"ature, the painters fared in some ways better than the poets. Theirs was a new art, and not a revival. "No classic models survived to hamper freedom of expression. Popular taste continued to demand con- ventional figure painting, even in the treatment of natural scenery. But long before the rise of Komanticism, Titian and Diirer had begun to turn space backgrounds into true * F. T. Palgrave, Landscape in Poetry, 167 //. MAFS COMMUNION WITH NATURE 37 landscape. Salvator Rosa caught the appeal of the roman- tic and sublime. Claude studied Nature so closely that he was able to generalize its impressions of atmosphere and sunlight. And generations of gifted Hollanders, in their rendering of ocean, sky and land, whether with bold nat- uralism or the poetic interpretation of wide spaces, de- veloped a knowledge and appreciation of natural beauty which in a later age would find ample recognition. It is not until Rousseau that Europe really comes to love wild Nature. Men break away from the artificial and conventional. The romantic spirit invests every natural object with charm and human meaning. This feeling has become so instinctive with us moderns, that it is hard to think our way back to the days, only a century and a half ago, when men did not pass through the Alps except from necessity, when a geometrical garden was preferred to a wooded hillside, and to go from city to country was apt to be considered a form of exile or penance. God's natural world is a Temple with various courts. To enter the outer precincts, one need not name the name of God. No set forms of worship are prescribed, no offer- ing, no temple fee. An artist's eyes are good. But the only requisites are a mind at leisure and a receptive soul. Let a man put aside for a while his work and cares, and step into the freshness and beauty out of doors. At once he finds himself on holy ground. The pure air fills his lungs, tense nerves relax, a new peace steals upon his spirit. His senses are alert to the beauty and melody around him. The comfortable warmth of the sun in the early spring- time, and the smell of moist earth. The brownish green of the prairie grass, with a background of red stems in the windbreak of willows. The first shy anemones, and the glory of marsh marigolds by the brookside. Wild plums and cherries with their splashes of white, set off against 38 CHAOS OE COSMOS? that new green world which the gooseberries had been fore- telling. A whiff of wild-grape blossoms. The apple trees in their bridal beauty. The aromatic fragrance of the sweet-fern, basking in the summer sun. The mountain stream where trout are hid- ing, and one takes toll besides of every mossy rock and silver brown ripple, of the sunlight through translucent young birches, and the cool damp shadows. Strawberries hanging over the brook at the edge of the meadow, where the queenly elm keeps solitary state. The lake at evening, as you glide out with your canoe and witness the marriage of sky and shore. The first sharp frost of Autumn, decking sumac and swamp maple in brave scarlet coats. Poplars minting their golden coins. The riotous colors of the sugar-bush in northern !N'ew England. The Turkish tapestry of the Connecticut hills. Bare branches, dividing the sky into traceries of forgot- ten beauty. The sparkle of fresh snow, and the ozone in one's lungs. And Spring will begin a new cycle of rhythmic loveliness. "How good is man's life, the mere living." If appreciation of God's world be worship, every red-blooded devotee is the better for communion. But nature worship is an instinct, universal, irrepres- sible. If we may not visit mountains and woods and streams, we can hang on cur wall the interpretation which some artist has given of them, or the camera's reminders. No home so poor but it may set up an altar in the shape of a potted plant, a slip to which the housewife brings her daily offering of water and love, a bulb that shows to won- dering young eyes the miracle of resurrection. 'No slum but has its flower vender, who finds eager purchasers. To my thinking a single rose, bought with one's last coin, is lovelier far than a plutocratic sheaf of blossoms. Even when the flower fades, the leaves and angled stem live on as objects of exquisite beauty. Every civilized city must have its parks, for the great multitude who cannot go MAN'S COMMUNION WITH NATURE 39 afield. We feel it a sacred duty to God and to humaiiity to reproduce as best we may the trees and flowers of His natural world, and the green grass where tired eyes may rest and children play. From this outer precinct of the Temple, some of us pass in to the court of Imagination. I confess that I sel- dom enter this sacred area, except when some poet or painter leads ma It is not that my powers of imagining are deficient. It is not that I see the machinery of nat- ural processes, for of these I know comparatively little. But my senses are so keen, my enjoyment of form and color so satisfying, I am so engrossed by N"ature's un- spoken friendliness, that I am not apt at drawing lessons or tracing spiritual meanings. I never should have made a good Greek, to people the natural world with nymphs and goddesses. I do not find in it suggestions for an old age vision of death, like the youthful Bryant And yet I enjoy it when my friends make Nature a setting for things human. A favorite painting by Sontag represents a wild forest scene. In the foreground is a log cabin, with the blue smoke curling upward. Now when I go to worship out of doors, unless I have some creature needs which man alone can supply, I prefer to take my forest straight. I object to intruders, to vulgar tourists, to farmers slashing into my favorite woods. But I am glad the painter put in the log cabin. Under the spell of his art, I can enter again into the hardships and satisfactions of the home- steader's life, as he hews a farm of his own out of the timber. In a certain picture of the Maine coast, the last rays of the sun touch the top of the cliffs, the masses of cloud, the distant island, the hollows of the ocean swell. But it is good that the artist adds some ships, to catch the golden light on their sails. And the two women on the rocks, in the costume of 1850, give a touch of fellow- ship to our common worship. The Angelus, without the tired reverent figures and the distant church tower, Vould 40 CHAOS OR COSMOS? be merely a study of the sunset afterglow in chrome yellow. By putting man into his landscape, the artist helps us to feel that God's world of l^ature, like the Sabbath, was made for man. But there is a Divine symbolism in the outward world which even the most sense-bound of nature worshippers may share, when a Jesus or some other poet-teacher leads the way. To pick a lily, and think that it is God who clothed it in its glorious colors. To ride along a forest road in October and feel that He has passed by, touching the foliage lightly with His frost brush. All over upland and lowland The charm of the golden rod, — Some of us call it Autumn And others call it God. Or take the sunrise, as pictured in various ages. For the singer of the Rig Veda, "she comes like a fair young maiden, awakening all to labor, with a hundred chariots comes she," or driving before her the red cattle of the clouds. In Homer too she is the rosy-fingered goddess, rising from her ocean couch, and yoking to her car the swift horses that carry light to men. With the Hebrew psalmist, Jehovah hac pitched a tent of many colors for the sun, which is like a bridegroom coming out of his chamber, and rejoices as an athlete to run his race. Or Jehovah covereth Himself with light as with a garment; He maketh the clouds His chariot, and walketh upon the wings of the wind. In Christian poetry, when freed from the trammels of classical convention, the symbolism changes: Out of the scabbard of the night. By God's hand drawn, Flashes the shining sword of light, And lo ! the Dawn. MAWS COMMUNION WITH NATURE 41 The inner court, the Holj of Holies, ushers us into the Presence. It is entered, at rare intervals, by the high priests of humanity, who see the natural world with the eyes of a mystic. There come moments in the life of man when "this earth he walks on seems not earth." And the vision melts into the glow of rapturous assurance. The literature of Mysticism shows us how religious men, in all ages, have found communion with NTature a communion with God. The God we find in ^Nature will be the God we have already come to know through instruction and social wor- ship. But the Presence is there, for the seer, no matter how unorthodox, to discover and possess. Berenson has called attention to the mystical value of space-composition in the Umbrian school of painters, notably Perugino. His art, while we are under its spell, "woos us away from our tight, painfully limited selves, dissolves us into the space presented, until at last we seem to become its permeating, indwelling spirit." ^ Perugino but reproduces the elemental rapture which Nature brings at times, especially in far perspectives. A feeling of awful yet thrilling immensity, a quickened pulse and breathing, the sense of being in the very presence of God Himself. In various situations it comes to me. Not only in a building with lofty arches, a cathedral, or one of our really great railway stations. But under the stars on a clear night. Or on stepping forth of a morning beneath the measureless sky of the West, where the blue stretches haze-less to the horizon. I have the same sensa- tion when I come out upon a mountain crest, and look off on wave after wave of giant peaks. This overwhelming sense of the Divine in Nature comes to many through the medium of wide spaces. Some few, like Whitman, are able to gain from any natural object the same inward identification with the Universe. Even as a child, he tells us, he became the things he looked on, "B. Berenson, Central Italian Painters, 1897, 102. 42 CHAOS OR COSMOS? and these objects became part of him, whether they were early lilacs, or "the sow's pink-faint litter," or water plants waving their graceful flat heads at the bottom of the pond. The French writer Senancoiirt tells of walking the streets of Paris on a dark day in early March. He was gloomy, and walked because he had nothing to do. He passed a jonquil in full bloom, bearing the first perfume of the year. In that instant, his cup of happiness overflowed. Unutter- able harmony, the sense of being in touch with the ideal world, arose in him complete. Whether in the rapt contemplation of the mystic, or the frank enjoyment of natural forms and colors, communion with the external world is, from our biological standpoint, a most important side of human experience. Love of ^Nature is a comparatively modern mood. But behind it lie the wonder and awe which have played such a large part in the history of Religion. In his emotional life, as well as in thinking and practical affairs, we find man seeking to adjust himself to his Environment. The Uni- verse, which the religious man calls the manifestation of God, is here. Whatever names we may give to it,, we can- not escape from its contact. In the words of the Hebrew psalmist: "Whither shall I go from Thy Spirit? Or whither shall I flee from Thy presence? If I mount up into the sky. Thou art there. If I lie down in the under- world, behold Thou art there. The darkness and the light are both alike to Thea" Y. THE EAETH AHD THE UNIVEESE. We turn from the murmuring brooks and sunset colors of this pleasant earth, divinely fair, to consider again the stellar universe, and the problem which it forces upon our minds. Jesus' ideas of astronomy were those of his own time. The sky was God's throne, and the earth His foot- stool. The Master's theory of the world was geocentric; there is no reason to suppose that the notion of other pos- sible worlds ever entered his thought. This earth and the life of man upon it were the center of God's interest. Here the spiritual order was to be developed. God's Kingdom was to come. His will to be done, on earth as in heaven. It is at this point that the Christian hypothesis meets its second test. Can it be made to fit the Universe of our growing knowledge? When Copernicus in 1543 estab- lished the fact that the earth is one of the planets revolving about the sun, and that the sun is a component part of the vast system of fixed stars, it came as a distinct shock to religious thought. The earth seemed to dwindle in this larger perspective, and human life to lose its unique sig- nificance. What are the general features of this physical Universe in which our lives are spent ? Nothing is final in Astron- omy. Cosmic philosophies, built up with great learning and enthusiasm, have been left behind as mere landmarks in the progress of Thought. Theory has ebbed and flowed, as new evidence pointed this way or that. Dr. See pub- lished one view of stellar evolution in 1896, and quite another view in 1910. The same tidal approximation 43 44 CHAOS OR COSMOS? toward the truth may be expected in the coming days. In this year of our Lord 1921, the general picture given by astronomers is something like this. I introduce the cor- rections which seem to be called for by Shapley'S study of globular clusters.^ Our home is in the Milky Way. And the Galaxy, which forms a sort of celestial metropolis, is not laid out as a band around the sky, but as a disk, filled with stars and gaseous clouds. Its outer diameter is estimated by Shap- ley at 300,000 light years. To locate our solar system more exactly, it lies roughly in the plane of the disk, but de- cidedly off from the center. According to the latest cen- sus, the galactic metropolis contains approximately a bil- lion stars, counting only those which are illuminated. They are separated from each other by an average distance of about 13 light years, or a little over 76 trillion miles. The apparent concentration of small stars in a belt across the heavens, is explained by their distance; we are looking through a greater depth, that is through the plane of the disk. Eddington has shown that the bright stars are fairly uni- form in mass, in spite of exceptional giants, like the newly famous Betelgeuse. They appear to be passing through an ascending and descending series, the color varying as the temperature rises or falls. The action of gravitation, what- * A fuller treatment will be found in Appendix B. Recent Progress in Cosmogony. Any attempt today at an astronomical compendium, is like trying to lay out a new atlas, with national boundaries changing from week to week. For general introductions, I refer the reader to F. K. Moulton, Introd. to Asiron., new ed., 1912; H. Jacoby, Astronomy, 1913; Adolpho Stahl Lectures in Astron.y Astron. Soc. of Pacific, 1919. For methods and results of Astro- physics: G. E. Hale, Study of Stellar Evol, 1908; W. W. Camp- bell, Stellar Motions, 1913; A. S. Eddington, Stellar Movements and the Struc. of the Univ., 1914. For cosmogony: T. J. J. See, Researches on Evol. of Stellar Syst's, vol. 2, 1910, rather dogmatic; S. Arrhenius, Worlds m the MaJcing, 1908; Destinies of the Starsi, 1918; J. H. Jeans, Problems of Cosmogony and Stellar Dynamics, 1919. For Geology: T. C. Chamberlin, Origin of the Earth, 1916: F. W. Clarke, Data of Geochemistry, 4th ed., 1920; L. V. Pirrson and Chas. Schuchert, Text Book of Qeol.f 1915; Lull, etc., Evol. of the Earth, 1918. THE EARTH AND THE UNIVERSE 45 ever that is, would tend to draw the stars together in ever- growing masses. But this is probably balanced by the scat- tering influences of electrical repulsion, radiation pressure, and perhaps explosion. Particles of star dust, escaping from the gaseous stars, form dark nebulous clouds. These in turn condense to make new heavenly bodies. Some features of our present Universe point toward an earlier stage, many hundreds of million years ago, when the material later made into stars formed an undifferentiated mass of rarified gas. When we pass from the metropolis and its suburbs to the country districts, we find two dominant types of heav- enly bodies. The spiral nebulae, of which about half a million have been detected, are apparently moving away from the Galaxy with great velocity. The condensed globular clusters of stars — 86 of them according to the latest count — are moving toward the Milky Way, and come closest to it on the opposite side. How are we to regard these extra-galactic or rural groups? Each globular cluster appears to be a separate and complete system. Do they represent other universes ? Shapley considers them rather as appendages of the Milky Way. They are miniature galaxies, rather than coequals. The Hercules cluster, for example, has a diameter of only 1100 light years, with a limited number of stars. In a later paper he attacks the question of the spiral nebulae, and reaches a similar conclusion. They must be regarded as genuine nebulae, rather than as collections of stars which form "island universes." ^ Do these spirals and clusters represent the outlying portions of our Universe, and suggest its order of magni- tude ? Or is the Universe infinite in extent, and filled with an infinite number of stars ? The light which reaches us from the stars as a whole is limited. On this ground the majority of astronomers had decided a few years ago in favor of a finite Universe. The question was reopened, *Pullid's of Astronom. 8oo. of Pacific, Oct., 1919. 46 CHAOS OK COSMOS? with the discovery of a certain amount of star dust in inter-stellar space. This suggested the possibility of a "fog," as Turner calls it, which cuts oif part of the light. But Shapley has shown that there is no appreciable ab- sorption of light in any part of the sky.^ If our tele- scopes can penetrate to over 200,000 light years, it is hard to see how any great amount of light can be cut off by fog. Apparently we are forced back to the conception of a finite Universe, with definite though vastly extended boun- daries. This, in connection with the relativity principle, may require the revision of many of our ideas of ther- modynamics.* By way of parenthesis, I may remark that the question of a finite or an infinite Universe has no bearing on the Christian hypothesis, except to determine the particular form which must be assigned to God in His physical mani- festation. ' Infinity is purely a spatial term. Space, if we accept Einstein's principle, is not a frame of reference, but a series of relations. A finite Universe is one whose rela- tions are capable of measurement An infinite Universe would be a Universe whose relations extend so far that we cannot expect to measure them with any instruments at our command. . Whether God, in His physical manifes- tation, is measurable or immeasurable, is a question of fact, which Astronomy alone can settle. Another equally futile question is whether the history and arrangement of the Universe gives any indication of an intelligent plan. Thus far Astronomy has done little more than draw up working theories which may serve as guides for further investigation. We do not know what is the arrangement of units and forces within the stellar * Ohservatory, Feb., 1919. Lebedew came to the same conclusion a few years ago, from a study of light waves. Kapteyn's studies appear to point to the selective absorption of certain rays, the red- ness of the stars increasing with their distance. Astrophya. «/., 29, 46, 1909; 30, 284, 1909; 40, 187, 1914. *This subject is discussed briefly in my Unfolding Universe, 57-60. THE EAETH AND THE UNIVERSE ^7 Universe, either in the present or the past. The dogmatism of the 19th century cosmic philosophers would be entirely out of place. Until astronomers give us this necessary knowledge, it is premature to discuss the plan of the stellar world. Personally I doubt whether the question will ever be in order. The Universe is here, to be accepted and studied, rather than criticized. Man's reason is a very inadequate standard. It is of little value to know whether the actual system is an intelligent arrangement, such as would be made by the person who asks whether it is intel- ligent. Let us pass to a more specific question: the possibility of life on other worlds. It is quite common to assume that the earth is not unique in this regard. Dr. See, for example, speaks of "millions of similar [solar] systems, with habitable planets, which may now be confidently inferred to exist in the immensity of space." Arrhenius makes the same assumption, and on it bases his new theory of panspermism. Wallace, in his very able book on Mans Place in the Universe,^ argued against this, on the law of probability. It will be well to restate Wallace's argument, with the modifications in detail due to our advancing knowledge. What are the factors necessary for the development of protoplasmic life, the only life we know ? Reducing Wal- lace's table to somewhat simpler terms, we may name four essential conditions, {a) A mean temperature well above the freezing point, and not in excess of about 73° C. (&) Water in sufficient quantity, and uniformly dis- tributed, (c) An atmosphere with an ample supply of carbon dioxide, and, for higher forms of life, free oxygen. {d) Sufficient nitrogen or nitrogen compounds, carried from the air into moist earth or standing water. The presence and maintenance of these factors require a heat producing body of approximately the temperature and distance of the sun ; a planetary mass sufficient to retain a •Alfred Russel Wallace, 3rd ed., 1905. 48 CHAOS OR COSMOS? dense atmospliere and hydrosphere ; and volcanic action of the earth's crust that will keep up the supply of carbon dioxide. These conditions the earth has fulfilled during the geologic period, usually estimated (both from the depth of sedimentary rocks and from the amount of salt in the ocean) as 100 million years. Have the conditions been met elsewhere? None of the other members of our solar system are cap- able of supporting life. The larger planets are masses of gas. Mercury, and probably Venus, always presents the same face to the sun. Mars, the only promising candi- date, now is considered to have a mean summer tempera- ture at the equator of — 27° C.^ Its mass, approximately one-tenth that of the earth, is not sufficient to retain an atmosphere and hydrosphere. The so-called "canals" are merely volcanic fissures. Changing colors are not due to vegetation, but to various salts and oxides, either dry or in solution. The attempt of Lowell and others to show the habitability of Mars, has not been creditable to Science. Able astronomers let their imaginations run riot, and proved anything they wished to prove, amid deafening applause from the galleries. We must guard against similar credulity in regard to habitable planets in other parts of the sky. Of the im- mense number of bright stars, very few appear to have duplicated the conditions of our solar system. A hundred million years is the time we have assigned to the organic history of the earth. Careful calculation shows that dur- ing this period only a little over 2000 stars are likely to have had close encounters with other stars.'' Only a small proportion of these encounters would have produced plane- tary systems. Of the planets thus formed, not all would furnish the conditions found on our earth. Wallace's argument, as I have restated it, seems to me to be against the probability of the simultaneous exist- "Arrhenius, Destinies of the Stars, 1918, chap. 6. 'See Appendix C. Eahitahle Plcmets among the Stars? THE EARTH AND THE UNIVERSE 49 ence of another habitable planet. In the immense stretch of astronomical time the case is somewhat altered. A re- currence of the conditions found on the earth is possible, we might say probable. When low forms of life began on our earth, 100 million years ago, a race of men on some distant planet may have been just ending their planetary- career. That is if life always follows in the Universe, when the conditions necessary for life are met. If the general probabilities are what I have stated, it is not necessary to consider Arrhenius' ingenious revival of the theory that spores from other inhabited worlds emigrated to our earth through inter-stellar space. Even if such transfer were possible, spores are far too scarce an article to fit the case. At best, this solution would only push the problem one step farther back. The origin of life still demands explanation. The present biological situation, in the light of our conception of the Universe as dynamic rather than mate- rial, calls for an entirely different line of approach. I recur to the idea which strongly appealed to Haeckel, though stated by him with many dogmatisms and incon- sistencies. The Universe which we know as physical, is at the same time endowed with the properties which appear to us as organic and psychical. To put it in another way, the forces of the Universe will, under certain conditions, interact with the electron groups which we call Matter, in the various forms of living protoplasm. Just what are the conditions of such interaction, the terms on which the physical may become the organic, we do not know. But we may hope to learn. The general hypothesis I have stated, which may be called the working theory of present-day Biology, has certain practical ad- vantages. It offers a clue for investigation. It may con- ceivably be verified by experiment Definite chemical theories of life's origin are as yet tentative, we might say premature. They need not be discussed in detail. I merely refer the reader to Woodruff's excellent summary 60 CHAOS OR COSMOS? of ^ve recent suggestions: Pfliiger's cyanogen theory, Moore's law of increasing physical complexity, Allen's primitive nitrogen compounds, Troland's enzyme theory, and Oshom's mutually attractive colloids.^ Each important discovery serves to narrow the problem. As we gain surer knowledge of the structure and activities of one-celled organisms, as we unravel, step by step, the marvellous complexity of the albumin molecules which appear to be the basis of protoplasm, as we learn the chemical nature of enzymes and other agents of the cell, — we may expect some day to know and recreate the condi- tions of organic life. It may never be possible to construct in the laboratory even the simplest cell. But it is within the bounds of possibility that we shall be able to put together some of the simpler aggregations of molecules from which the cell has grown, and see them showing quasi- biotic activities. Such a goal is the inspiration of the modem scientist. The worker in Biology believes himself to be tracing the beginnings of that process of organic action and inter- action which forms one of the most fascinating mysteries of our mysterious Universe. He might well say, with the great astronomer, "I think Thy thoughts after Thee." The religious idea, as stated in the pictorial language of primitive thought, that God breathed into clay the breath of life, is entirely consistent with the scientific statement that, under certain conditions, carbon compounds show new properties and behavior which we call organic. In •L. L. Woodruff, in Evolution of the Earth, 1918, lecture 3; E. Pfliiger, Arch. f. d. ges. Physiol., vol. 10, 1875; Benj. Moore, Origin cmd Nature of Life, 1912; F. J. Allen, What is Life? Bir- mingham Nat. Hist, and Philos. Soc., 11, 44, 1899; L. T. Troland, Mdnist, 24, 92, 1914; and H. F. Osborn, Origin and Evol. of Life, 1917, 67 //. To these should be added the osmosis theory of Stephanne Leduc, Mechanism of Life, Eng. trans., 1911. See also articles by E. A. Schafer and H. E. Armstrong, reprinted in Smith- sonian Inst. Report, 1912, 493, 527; E. A. Minchin, Evolution of the Cell, Am. Naturalist, 50, pp. 1, 106, 270, 1916; Felix le Dantec, Nature and Origin of Life, Eng. trans., 1906. THE EARTH AND THE UNIVERSE 51 fact, if we believe that God is revealed to us in the physical TTniverse, the two statements are identical. Man's place in the Universe is not a question of stellar geography, or of the number of inhabited worlds. The moral value of human life, the achievements of the human mind, the development of a social order, — these retain the place which they held at the beginning of the Christian era. The Christian hypothesis is not affected by the ex- panding idea of the world. Modem Astronomy has merely given human life a larger perspective. Man has become indeed a cosmopolitan. The Universe of his adjustment has taken grander outKnes. Our God is a greater God, He no longer is localized or provincial. But He is the same God. The very uniformity of Nature must give the Universe an identical character, whether on the foothills of an earthly Galilee or in the recesses of Orion. VI. THE UNIVERSE UNFOLDING. In the background of the previous discussion another question has been lurking. Christianity asserts a goal in organic creation. God works for a definite end : the mak- ing and perfecting of Man. Is such teleology consistent with the facts of Biology as we know them ? This is the third test of the Christian hypothesis. The general idea of evolution, rather than special crea- tion, is entirely consistent with the conception of the Uni- verse which we have already reached. In fact, no other view harmonizes with Jesus' idea of God's activity in Nature. The Master himself suggested the method of gradual unfolding, though he had no basis for applying it to biology. If we accept the doctrine of organic evolu- tion, and conceive of God as working from within rather than without, we should be prepared to take the conse- quences. One of these is that the God revealed through Biology must be the same as the God revealed by Christ. Otherwise the Christian theory of the Universe would fail to square with the fact. Man is the culmination of a long evolutionary process. Was this an accident, or was it an inevitable result of the forces involved ? Let me review the question of the origin of species as it stands today. ^ In evolutionary theory, the extreme Darwinians held the fidd for two generationa. The origin of species was *A good elementary treatment will be found in John M. Coulter, Evolution, Heredity and Eugenics, 1916; and, with M. C. Coulter, Plant Genetics, 1918. See also R. C. Punett, Mendelism, 5th ed., 1919; T. H. Morgan, Evolution and Ado/ptation, 1903; Physical Basis of Inheritance, 1919; W. Bateson, Prohlema of Genetics, 1913. fi2 THE UmVEKSE UNFOLDING 53 attributed to minute fluctuations, in size, color, form and organs. These, if of any advantage in the intense struggle for existence, were perpetuated by natural selection. The individuals lacking this small advantage were extermi- nated. These selected organisms were in turn subject to fluctuation and selection. The net result was a slow but definite modification of structure, by which they became better adapted to surrounding conditions. Continued long enough, and with the environment changing from time to time, the process was supposed to bring into being the millions of distinct varieties and species found on our planet. Progress represented the summation of a series of fortunate accidents. Natural Selection was the deus ex machina. The successful individual or species was a sort of juggernaut, riding to power over the bleeding bodies of those that had failed in the struggle, proved themselves unfitted to survive. It was a complete though cruel pic- ture. Some biologists still hold to it in toto; parts of it must be retained on any theory. The doctrine of progress through struggle left a deep and in many ways unfor- tunate impression on the thought of our age. The World War was a logical consequence of the idea that you must kill off your competitors in order to survive. Another era began in 1900, with the rediscovery of MendeFs principle of unit characters, and de Vries' study of mutations in the evening primrose. The new school of Biology differs from the old in three important particu- lars. In the first place, the study of genetics is on an experimental basis. The specific characters of plant and animal groups must be determined, not by surface resem- blances, but through breeding experiments in the labora- tory. Mendel's law makes possible the manipulation and control of the various factors which are brought out by crossing and segregated in line breeding. Secondly, at- tention is directed, not to fluctuations, but to true varia- tions, which hg^ve their seat in the germ cell. Johannsen showed that in a pure line, though the size fluctuated con- U CHAOS OE COSMOS? stantly, the differences were not inherited, and could not be selected in a way to affect the mean of the race. The mod- em plant or animal breeder goes deeper, and works with heritable factors. These may be either recombinations or mutations.^ In the third place, the mutationist school has given up hunting for reasons why the new form is better fitted to survive. Adaptation is no longer the sole criterion for species making. Struggle has no necessary connection with progress. The new characters that appear may be of distinct adrantage to the organism, and again they may not. If mutations or new combinations manage to secure a foothold, they will live on side by side with the older and possibly more adaptable type. ITature is a very hos- pitable host.^ Advance in structure has probably been by large rather than small steps. It is only in the case of a new factor which represents marked improvement in adaptation, that selection tends to weed out older forms. The one-toed horse displaced the two-toed horse, very much as the pneumatic tire displaced the. solid rubber tire on the bicycle. This shift of scientific opinion not only cuts the ground from under the competition theory, in its applications to man's social history. It enables us to take the organic world as we find it, in its infinite and fascinating variety, without that inventing of imaginary means to serve hypo- thetical ends, which vitiated the whole Darwinian school, as it did the earlier school of Paley. If there is teleology in l!Tature, it is not of the pure natural selection brand. The one-toed horse is a one-toed horse because a certain recombination of factors in its germ plasm, with which 'See Appendix D. The Emergence of a Neio Species. 'Survival is chiefly a question of fortunate location, or of indi- vidual reproductive power and general vigor, and in cross-fertilized plants the most vigorous individuals are hybrids. Pure lines are largely man's creation. Most of the forms which have been made or discovered in the laboratory, and used for starting new lines, would not have been selected automatically by Nature. THE UOTVEESE UNFOLDINa 55 selection was not concerned, gave it one toe on each foot instead of two. What are these factors, or "genes," which lie at the hasis of the origin of species, and which the plant breeder is able to some extent to manipulate ? We do not know, any more than the chemist, up to a few years ago, knew the nature of the elements he mixed in his test tubes. I mean this comparison to suggest two things. The progress of Science may be expected to throw definite light on the problem. And the solution is likely to be found in the field of organic chemistry. Castle, whose return to the mutationist ranks is an event of the greatest importance, states that the result of his recent experiments with piebald rats "favors the widely accepted view that the single gene is not subject to fluctuating variability, but is stable like a chemical compound of definite composition, and changes only similarly, by definite steps." * From the standpoint of Physics, which no physical phenomena can escape, organisms represent the transfor- mation of familiar and measurable energies, and the rearrangement of equally familiar atoms and molecules. The transformations and arrangments are of very much greater complexity than in the organic field. But they are the same in kind, and follow the same laws. Recent lit- erature bears eloquent witness to this general fact.^ There is a growing impression that evolution, whether in stars or crystals, in colloids or organisms, is one process, which in all its phases is equally characteristic of the Universe.^ If the environment of the organism is physico-chemical, and the germ cell is itself a physico-chemical phenomenon, variation, like life itself, must be due to the interaction of these two sets of closely related factors. In this regard the religious and scientific standpoints are identical, since our knowledge of God's method in Evolution is derived *W. E. Castle, Proo. Nat. Acad. Sci., 5, 126, 1919. * See Appendix E. Chemistry and the Organism. • This view has been ably presented by L. J. Henderson, Fitness of the Environment, 1913; Order of Nature, 1917. 66 CHAOS OE COSMOS? solely from the study of ISTatiire. It is not necessary to suppose that God acts through a hypothetical entelechy or vital force. When we once recognize the essentially dy- namic character of the physical Universe, God may act equally well through an enzyme or an amino acid. I ask the reader to hold in aheyance the question as to whether variation, which lies at the basis of the origin of species, is anything more than the interaction of one part of the Universe with another. "We are concerned in this chapter with the question of Teleology in regard to the evolutionary process as a whole. In discussing Chaos or Cosmos, it is vitally important to know whether organic history represents team-work toward a definite goal, or whether it is a free-for-all that only happens to arrive anywhere. We do not ask at this point what the organism is in itself, or how we are to explain the element of "be- havior," the apparent striving of the living unit toward specific ends. In the next section of our book I shall take up the problem of the Individual. From our present point of view, organic evolution is an "energy traffic," to use Allen's term, through the medium of organic machines, of ever increasing complexity. The most complete development of this idea is that of Osborn, in his Origin and Evolution of Life J Beginning with the Bacteria, which are able to capture the energy in certain chemical elements, we pass to the Algae, whose acquire- ment of chlorophyll makes it possible to transform the energy in solar rays. The Plants represent a higher de- velopment of this function. At a later stage, the Protozoa, through their better chemical equipment, break up the energy already accumulated by the bacteria and algae on which they feed. This type of energy transformer is de- veloped further in the many-celled animals, which likewise depend on organic material, largely green plants. The 'H. F. Osborn, 1917. A brief outline of this theory is given in Appendix F, The Evolution of the Organic Machine. Cf. D. M. S. Watson, Science Progress, 11, 216, 1916 j Richard S. Lull, in Evol. of the Earth, 1918, lecture 4. THE UNIVERSE UNFOLDING 67 process culminates in the various Vertebrate types. These show an increasingly complex and adaptable mechanism for transforming the energy stored in the food supply. As Osborn puts it, "the solar energy transformed into the chemical potential energy of the compounds of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen in the plants is transformed by the animal into motion and heat and then dissipated. Thus in the life cycle we observe both the conservation and the degradation of energy, corresponding with the first and second laws of thermodynamics." ® In the development of this energy traffic, we note three parallel series of changes. The first is that of the physical environment. It is necessary to keep constantly in mind the geologic fluctuations which have taken place during these hundred million years or more. The readjustment of the earth's surface, due to shrinkage of the planetary mass, brought periodic changes, both in the character of the land and in the distribution of land and water areas. At the beginning of each geologic era, we see the re-eleva- tion of continental mountain ranges. This was accom- panied by a cold period, which disarranged all organic life. At least six of these major crises are known. Minor readjustments of the earth's crust brought radical if less severe changes in climate. Corresponding with these physical changes are those in the general life environment. Each period of the history has its characteristic fauna and flora. The organism must face new enemies, whether predatory creatures or disease- bearing parasites. The food supply is altered : in variety, quantity and distribution. In the Cenozoic era, for example, the emergence of warm-blooded Mammals seems to be associated with the rise of flowering plants and grasses. The drying up of central Asia, at a later period, compelled the early Primates to descend from the trees. The third line of change, with which we are specially concerned, is that in the organic machine itseK. The •Op. oit., 53. 58 CHAOS OK COSMOS? situa/fcion, particularly at certain epochs, put a premium on adaptability. This might take the direction of im- proved chemical equipment, which made it possible for the organism to utilize new types of food. It might lie along the line of greater disease-resistance. It might rep- resent an improved mechanism, whether for capturing food, for escaping enemies, or for producing or protect- ing offspring. Each geologic crisis is marked by the scrap- ping of much of the previous machinery. "The rulers of the various domains find themselves overtrained and over- specialized, and succumb one after another to the changing environment. Their places are taken by the small, less specialized, and heretofore little known stocks, which quickly adapt themselves to their environments and become the dominatoTS of the organisms about them. In all of this unceasing organic struggle most of the unadaptive families fail to continue; others are pushed by the pulse of life into the less desirable places, where they continue to live as static forms — the living fossils that tell us so much that is most interesting of once prominent stocks of plants and animals ; but at all times much of life quickly responds to the changing environment and is remodelled into the more fit, active, and alert types." ^ Whatever the explanation may be, students of Paleon- tol(^y are agreed that the evolutionary changes in any type have tended to show progressive adaptation. The empha- sis or suppression of earlier structures or proportions has been more or less continuous, involving small successive changes. The jaw of the horse may be used as an example. Taking first the premolars, no horse from the Lower Eocene has been found with any fully molariform teeth. All horses from the Middle Eocene have two molariform teeth in the lower jaw. From the Upper Eocene, all horses have four such teeth. In the Oligocene they have six. Turning to the molars, older horses, as in the Oligocene, have brachyodont teeth without cement. All Miocene •Chas. Schuchert, in Ewl. of the Earth, 1918, 81. THE UNIVEESE UNFOLDING 59 horses are progressively hypsodont, with a progressive in- crease in the amount of cement. The milk teeth of Miocene horses have practically no cement. Those of all Pliocene and later horses are heavily cemented.^^ Something of the same process appears to have been going on in the evolution of the nervous system. Only the last steps in the long and fascinating story can be sug- gested here. The arboreal life of the early Primates favored a high development of the senses of vision, touch and hearing, with the corresponding brain areas. Com- pelled by further geologic changes to descend to the ground, a partly erect attitude and walking gait allow the development of the hands and fingers. This in turn brings further growth and specialization of the brain. The Neanderthal race, which flourished in Europe in the early Pleistocene (perhaps 800,000 years ago), stands erect, has a well-developed opposable thumb, and the brain centers controlling the motions of the limbs, hands and fingers are well developed. There is only a rudimentary develop- ment of the anterior centers of the brain, associated with speech and ideation. By the Aurignacean age, placed by Osbom at 25,000 years ago, but probably very much earlier. Homo Sapiens possesses his full powers. ^^ Our interpretation of organic evolution as the perfect- ing of a physico-chemical mechanism, correlated with an environment of the same essential character, is of course only provisional. But it has the advantage of being stated in the same terms that are now being used for the origin of life.^^ Let us see where this interpretation leads us. It is perfectly clear that God did not plan out the details of creation, as a human executive would lay out a schema "Wm. K. Gregory, Am. Naturalist, 50, 622, 1917, with quotation from W. D. Matthew. The series of evolutionary changes men- tioned may have covered a period of 12 million years. "H. F. Osbom, Men of the Old Stone Age, 3rd ed., 1918; G. Elliot Smith, Evolution of Man, reprinted in Smithsonian Inst. Report, 1912, 553; Jos. Barrell, 8ci. Monthly, 4, 16, 1917. "See ante p. 49. 60 CHAOS OR COSMOS? of development, to be put througli according to a certain schedule. N"or can we think of the result as a matter of chance. The Universe arrives. The perfecting of the animal food supply makes possible the evolution of animal life. A growing adaptability to changing environments culminates in the intelligent mastery of the earth by the human species. If there is life on other worlds, we have every reason to suppose that organic evolution would fol- low parallel lines, and reach a similar specialization of the nervous system. But it has taken a hundred million years. And the Universe does its work in its own way. The picture of God which we gain is not that of a great Engineer working from without, as in pre-Darwinian days. "Not is He the Supreme Judge of the iN'atural Selection theory, a sort of magnified Biometrician, an olympian Karl Pearson, measuring rival claims to adaptation and remorselessly sentencing to death the less successful. Rather we are led to think of a Divine Universe unfolding from within. The individual organism may be thought of as a part of the Whole, or as a semi-independent energy transformer, closely interacting with the Environment. In either case the transformation of known energies ac- cording to partially known laws, gives us a working ex- planation of organic history. We are not concerned here with the reason why the Universe unfolds, but merely with the fact that it does. Such self-expression appears entirely natural, and in harmony with what we know of God in His physical manifestation. Life does not behave like a cosmic blunder or accident. This idea of a dynamic Universe unfolding from within, is what the Christian hypothesis really calls for. The process is not the chance aggregation of material particles, but the outworking of Divine forces. The simplest bacil- lus shows an assemblage of atom groups which we do not find in the entire inorganic world. In organization and potential power, the advance from the amoeba to the tyrant dinosaur, from the dinosaur to man, is like the development THE UNIVEESE UNFOLDING 61 of machinery from human muscle to the modem dynamo. The Universe of which man is in some sense a part, reveals throughout geologic history a growth in complexity, in variety, in the perfecting of form, in the adapting of means to ends, in the control of physical energy for further crea- tion, before which we all stand in reverent wonder. PAKT n. THE KELATION OF MAN TO THE UNIVERSE. PART II. THE RELATIOlSr OF MAIST TO THE UNIVERSE. VII. THE MAKING OF MAN. How are we to think of a dynamic Universe, which snows also the phenomena of evolving Life ? Two general views are possible. There are divergent tendencies of thought, which may be called respectively Monism and Pluralism. Whether we follow the first or the second will make a good deal of difference in the place we give to Man as an individual. The monist puts it in this way. The Universe is an all- inclusive unity, the sum total of what we know as God, Matter, Life and Mind — the Whole of which we are a part, and to whose completeness we may perhaps con- tribute. This theory has taken many forms. In Religion it appears as Pantheism. God is Himself the All, and my life is a current in the great ocean of His life. Such an interpretation is fascinating to many minds. It gives logical symmetry to the apparently disjointed facts of the world. It offers a kind of Nirvana to the distracted, hard- pressed spirit of man. Reality is an Absolute Monarch, to whom we should submit. The Universe must take the final responsibility for evil and pain. Pluralism likewise has taken many forms. The con- trasting theory which I wish to consider makes the present Universe a social order. It asserts the dignity and worth 65 66 CHAOS OE COSMOS? of the individual man, as lie faces the external world. As Pascal said : "Though the Universe crush me, I am greater than the Universe. For I can know of my defeat, but the Universe can never know of its victory." "Under the bludgeonings of chance," shouts Henley, "my head is bloody, but unbowed." Yet it is not necessary to shake one's fist at the Universe. If man with his unconquerable soul is a part of it, he has a responsibility for its shaping and its final outcome. He shares the defeats and the vic- tories. The static unity of the monist becomes an unfold- ing social order, a Kepublic of conscious units. With the external world, which the Christian calls a manifesta- tion of God, with this vast dynamic system upon which the individual is so closely dependent, man's relation is not one of subjection but of cooperation. The Universe has ceased to be a despotism. Christianity holds to this latter theory. Man not only communes with God through ISTature. 'He cooperates with God in ISTature. With the general truth of this position the Christian hypothesis must stand or fall. In this and succeeding chapters, I shall sketch various human activities and functions, which suggest what we might term the democratic character of the Universe. Our journey will be a somewhat long and rambling one; I trust it will not be without interest. We cannot hurry through the daily life of Man as if we were intellectual Cook's tourists. For convenience I shall continue to call the two rival theories Pluralism and Monism. The exact connection between the external world and God lies out- side of this book, though our 'discussion will illustrate Jesus' idea of God as present in every aspect of our daily adjustment.^ *I also leave undetermined the relation of the lower organisms to the Universe. (See the opposite views of the individual held by T. H. Morgan, Phys. Basis of Heredity, 1919; Jacques Loeb, Organ- ism as a Whole, 1916; and Wm. E. Ritter, Unity of the Orga/nism, 1919.) These show a creative activity that is somewhat similar THE MAKING OF MAN 67 Our first evidence for the cooperative character of the Universe appears in the making of Man himself. In the perpetuation of the race, we find him sharing creation at its highest. Man's part in this task begins with procrea- tion. The normal function of men and women is parent- hood. On the voluntary union of the sexes depends the very existence of the human units which represent the climax of organic evolution. It is not strange that the fact of sex is one of the dominating factors in human history. Taking its rise in the earliest forms of life, as an alternative to other forms of reproduction, it soon becomes a normal differentiation of function. The sexual instincts evolve side by side with the changes in structure. Whatever the forms of court- ship or of union, the fundamental facts, when studied under the microscope, are everywhere strangely similar. In Man, as in the plants and animals that share his world, the sperm brings to the egg the stimulus to reproduction. Each contributes one-half of the factors which determine the character of the new life. And at once, through the action of God's physico-chemical forces, there begins in the body of the mother that marvellous development by which the single fertilized cell becomes a complete reproduction of the parents, able to take its part in the creation of the world. No act is more sacred, more essentially religious. As Bryan Hooker sings, of the fathers dead in the World War: For the flower from the clod emerging And the fire from the cloud released. For the wife that is more than virgin And the man that is more than beast; For the spirit in strange communion With earth, yet more than earth — but very much less developed. If the Universe has changed from Monism to Pluralism, as human activities seem to show, we might expect the differentiation to be by gradual steps. 68 CHAOS OE COSMOS? The mystery of union. The miracle of birth — For these, and what holier dreaming Our dust and its deeds have meant, You are the blood redeeming — You are the Sacrament. Jesus' practical emphasis on the sacredness of marriage and sexual passion finds expression in Paul's words, that the human body is a temple of the Holy Spirit, never to be desecrated or defiled. The sex impulse is to be controlled, and if necessary subordinated and diverted. But it is to be used, not outlawed. Biology has strengthened rather than weakened this position. Religion stands on solid ground when it considers every union of sperm and egg cells the creation of a new life, sacred as all human life is sacred, whose wilful destruction is murder, and when it regards any such union of cells that does not aim at repro- duction as a sin against God the Creator. The act itself has been a prayer for the creation of a new life. So great is the responsibility for this share in the creative act, that it demands the wisest planning, and the freest and fullest cooperation. The prevention of conception follows of necessity, if we recognize that voluntary and temperate intercourse in marriage, the sharing of mutual passion with one another and with God, is an act of worship, of the highest moral and spiritual value. The facts indicate that this principle of sex relations, given by Jesus, is a law written into the very structure of the Universe. Every instinct has a biological value, and that of sexual desire is linked with God in the Divine work of creation. The parity of the sexes in monogamous marriage, and the restriction of intercourse to those who enter this relation, is the result of a long series of experi- ments in the history of the race. Wherever the principle of creative cooperation has been followed, it has meant the moral elevation of manhood, of womanhood, of child- THE MAKING OF MAN 69 hood. Wherever it has been disobeyed, in loose sexual relations or in prostitution, the result has been the degra- dation of a vast multitude of women, the loss of self-control and physical virility in men, and a spread of sexual disease that has lowered the birth-rate and left a heritage of dis- eased or abnormal offspring. That which is one of the primal religious impulses degenerates into lust and ob- scenity. Failure to adjust ourselves to the Universe, through the proper functioning of the sex instinct, is sin, and the wages of sin is death. The removal of the causes of prostitution and abnormal desire, the sublimation of this natural impulse, the opening of other channels for its expression — this is one of the greatest tasks which a Chris- tian civilization faces. ^ We hear much today of the science of Eugenics. It will be well for us to consider both its possibilities and its limits. There are laws of heredity in the Universe, just as truly as there are laws of chemical combination or physical stress. What is present in the germ plasm of the parents will reappear in their children. Conversely, we cannot trans- mit anything that we do not ourselves possess. The char- acters and abilities acquired by father and mother in the course of their lives, do not modify the germ and sperm cells, and so cannot be handed on. From our present evi- dence, it seems probable that the embryo is not definitely affected by the environment, except through malnutrition or direct poisoning. The child will start at birth about where its parents started at their birth. *Jane Addams, The Spirit of Youth and the City Streets, 1909; A. A. Brill, Psychoanalysis, 2nd ed., 1914. For other subjects treated in this chapter, see W. J. Robinson, Birth Control, 1917 ; Paul Popenoe and R. J. Johnson, Applied Eugenics, 1918, somewhat polemical in tone, but judicious and avoiding the errors of previous works; E. G. Conkljn, Heredity and Environment, 1915; Franz Boas, Mind of Primitive Man, 1911; John B. Watson, Behavior, 1914; Chas. W. Waddle, Introd. to Child Psychology, 1918; Wm. McDougall, Social Psychology, 13th ed., 1918; Maurice Parmelee^ Science of Huma/n Behavior, 1913. 70 CHAOS OE COSMOS? Thus far it has not been possible to resolve into definite factors the many complex influences which determine the inheritance of physical and mental traits. We know too little to lay down definite rules such as those used by the plant or animal breeder. All we can say is that the re- sponsibility for healthy mating rests heavily upon the in- dividual and upon Society. Other things being equal, the child which at birth is the most perfect physical animal has a better chance all through its life. Studies of American school children, and later of sol- diers, by the Binet-Simon and other tests, have shown a very wide range of intelligence, grading all the way from idiocy to genius, the greatest number coming near the mid- dle of the scale. Counting 100 as normal, Terman found 2% of school children testing 128 or above, 2% testing 73 or below, and 60% ranging from 91 to 110. Similar results have appeared when tests were made for special lines of mental ability. Temperament probably varies in the same way, though an adequate system of classification is not at hand. Proper allowance must be made for other contributing factors. But the differences appear to be in the main congenital. From a biological standpoint, all men are not created equal. Differences in temperament and mental ability are not correlated with physical features, in normal cases. They must be attributed to independent series of mutations. Every so-called "race" is composed of an almost unlimited number of strains. The same climatic influences or geo- graphic isolation which brought about the average differ- ences in physical type, might result in average differences in temperament and intelligence. Doubtless man's evolution is continuous. Favorable, and unfavorable, mutations and recombinations may occur here and there, in any group. Each person born is a new individual type. But the net result is the same. There will be no Supermen. The success of government and mis- sion schools among the lowest savage tribes, indicates that THE MAKING OF MAN 71 the mean intelligence of Homo Sapiens has not been raised by any process of natural selection.^ Intelligence varies the world over because it always has varied, and such dif- ferences are inherited. Present deviations from the mean are not altered by immigration, but only redistributed. We hope for more children from the more intelligent indi- viduals and groups, and fewer children from the less intel- ligent. Civilization needs leaders, and it needs the high- est possible average. But any healthy strain has valuable contributions to make to the human capital of the Uni- verse. Statistical studies bear out the statement that the mean intelligence of the race remains at about the same level. Although the mating of persons of high or low intelligence may raise or lower the average for several generations, the "drag" of previous ancestry and intermarriage with other grades tend to bring the group back toward the mean. In the statistical laws of inheritance worked out by Pear- son, the expected contribution of the parents is given as .6244. That of grandparents is .1988, and of great- grandparents .0630. As stated by East and Jones, "the brightest examples of inherent mental ability have come and will come from chance mating in the general popula- tion, the common people so-called, because of the variability there existent.'^ ^ The task of Eugenics is to encourage the reproduction of those members of society who show superior mental traits, and to check the reproduction of those whose mental power is abnormally low. To work for either of these ends is aid in the Divine work of creation. The problem cannot be met merely by selective mating, and the willingness of superior stocks to bear offspring. It involves the whole range of social questions. War en- ters into it, as do commerce and taxation. We must also pay attention to housing, health, the relation between in- •To give a single example, Porteua' tests of aboriginal children in Australia show an average deviation of only five months from the standard for whites. PsycJiol. Review, 24, 32, 1917. * Inbreeding and Outhreedingy 1919, 244. 72 CHAOS OR COSMOS? comes and cost of living, education, opportunities for socilil life, and the proper treatment of defectives and delin- quents. But tlie making of Man has only begun at birth. These individuals, of many physical types, with various tem- peraments, with different degrees of congenital mental capacity, are so much raw material which Society is to mold into the finished product. The child is born with a completed body, but a very incomplete brain. His nerve- cells, or neurones, are in place, with all their latent poten- tialities. Some of them are fully developed, making pos- sible the instinctive reflexes of the new-bom child. But the majority, especially the neurones of the cerebral hemi- spheres, are yet unfinished. They must extend their branches, and develop their insulating sheaths. The asso- ciation neurones, which have appeared latest in the his- tory of evolution, will be the last to complete their growth. Although this development is largely carried out by God, along the lines laid down by heredity, the plasticity of the child brain gives the individual and those responsible for his training a chance for cooperation of the most definite kind. The fundamental distinction between man and his first cousins among the higher mammals, like the gorilla and chimpanzee, is not in physical features, or in the size and arrangement of the brain. It lies rather in what man is able to teach his brain to do, by virtue of his inheriting a well developed speech mechanism. In early infancy, the child trains certain centers in his left brain, if he is right-handed, or in his right brain, if he is left-handed; for the training is done largely through the use of the hand in feeling and gesturing. By the training of these centers, he is able to name his mental recepts and achieve ideas and spoken words, as the gorilla cannot. He learns to write, to play musical instruments, to operate elaborate machines. The gorilla species, in other respects, has prac- tically as good machinery in the brain as the human THE MAKING OF MAN 73 species. But being without a speech mechanism in throat and brain, it lacks the power, and always did lack the power, and always will, to develop the rest of the cerebral machinery and put it to the fullest use. The normal human baby possesses that power. He will inevitably become a thinking being. He persists in training his hands. We could not prevent him from talking, even if he must make a language of his own. This distinguishing feature in Man, the training of one of the hemispheres of the brain, takes place after birth. It continues for about sixteen years, and to some extent through life. For each individual, the limits of such training are set by heredity. But the training itself is a matter of environment, of the child's surroundings and schooling. Up to the point where development is possible, man makes his own brain. He shapes his own character. He determines his own relations with the Universe. As Dr. Thompson has said: "While all individuals of our race are not born with equally good brains, yet the fact remains that the special mental capacities for which cer- tain men have become eminent were all acquired and were not congenital." ^ All education must be self -education. But the guiding of it is a sacred function, a cooperation with God in the greatest of all tasks. A pedagogical revolution is slowly going forward, due to the iafluence of Kousseau, Froebel and Pestalozzi. Education is coming to be a process of natural growth, rather than the acquiring of a certain amount of information. It is not "something to be forced upon children and youth from without, but is the growth of capacities with which human beings are endowed at birth." « ■ Wm. M. Thomson, Bram cmd Personality, 1908, 233. 'John and Evelyn Dewey, SchooU of Tomorrow, 1915, 2. See also John Dewey, Democracy and Education, 1916; E. L. Thorn- dike, Educational Psychol., 1913; Frank N. Freeman, How Children Learn, 1917; E. P. Cubberley, Public Education in the U. 8., 1919; Alexander Inglis, Prm'a of Secondary Eduction, 1918. 74 CHAOS OK COSMOS? To fail in developing the full capacity of any human child, of whatever race, is to block the work of creation, or leave it only half completed. Terman's studies show that individuals with an Intelligence Quotient of 70 may reach a mental age of 11, or an equivalent of fifth grade work in school. An I. Q. of 80 represents a mental age of 12^2? or seventh grade. "A large proportion of the tasks in the modern organization of industries can be as well performed by individuals of the 70 or 75 I. Q. class as by those of superior intelligence, and with more satisfaction in the performance. Mentality of eleven years is ample for ordinary kinds of unskilled labor, and many of the semi-skilled trades are within reach of those who test a year or two higher. To make the most of this grade of ability, however, it must be trained. For chil- dren who test below 75 or 80 I. Q., genuine vocational training should largely replace the usual curriculum of the Upper grammar grades." He instances M., a Portu- guese boy, leaving school at 16, after struggling painfully through the sixth grade. His mental age is 10%, and his Intelligence Quotient 72. He cannot be rated as feeble- minded. "About ordinary affairs his judgment is depend- able, and he is steady, industrious and anxious to make good. There are probably many kinds of semi-skilled work in which he could succeed. For none of these has he received any preparation. Aiter nine years in school, he faces the world with no vocational asset but his God-given brawn. There are approximately a million children like M. in the public schools of the United States." "^ Vocational training has a broader aspect. All children, of lower or higher intelligence, need guidance in their choice of a life work, and adequate preparation for it. They must learn to adjust themselves to the present indus- trial and democratic era. There is a growing feeling among progressive educators that the mere trade school does not meet the situation. The demands of industry 'L. M. Terman, Intelligence of School Children, 1919, 133 /. THE MAKING OF MAN 76 and of citizenship cannot be met without broad and uni- versal equipment. ^The democracy which proclaims equality of opportunity as its ideal requires an education in which learning and social application, ideas and prac- tice, work and recognition of the meaning of what is done, are united from the beginning and for all." ^ In this cooperative task, the influence of the home, of the church, of the play life, of associates and surroundings, must rank with that of the trained teacher. We are com- ing to learn that the making of man is an extremely com- plex process, involving a constant interaction between hu- man instincts craving expression, and the social environ- ment which encourages or hinders such expression. Take, for example, Parker's analysis of the Western hobo. "The history of the migratory workers shows that starting with the long hours and dreary winters of the farms they ran away from, or the sour-smelling bunk-house in a coal village, through their character-debasing experience with the drifting ^ire and fire' life in the industries, on to the vicious social and economic life of the winter unemployed, their training predetermined but one outcome, and the en- vironment produced its type." ^ Eepression of the natural instincts of children and adults is fraught with grave dan- ger to Society as well as to the subject. It leads either to weakness, inefficiency and moral debasement; or compen- sation is sought in some more or less violent form of revolt. Since man became man, 400,000 years ago, the real evolution of the race, as we shall see in the following chapters, has been the evolution of social equipment: the gathering of an increasing store of ideas and experience, of tools, institutions, customs, outlets for expression, which are at the service of each child born into the tribe or nation. Herein lies the primary advantage of the civilized ^Schools of Tomorrow, 315. See later p. 205. For Vocational Guidance: Meyer Bloomfield, Youth, School and Vocation, 1915. •Carleton H. Parker, The Casual Laborer, 1920, 123. 76 CHAOS OE COSMOS? child, at its best, over the savage, of the child from a good home over the child from the slum, or the backwoods. It is bom into an inheritance larger, richer, more fitted to express man's instinctive desires and reactions, and des- tined to become still better and more general, as God's partners in Creation rise up to mold the conditions under which children are bom, and men and women live their lives. In regard to many points in this chapter, there may be difference of opinion. But the differences would affect the distribution of the several factors involved, rather than the general situation. The making of Man is not an event but a process. And in that process the human race has a definite and responsible share. At any point, men are able to alter the creative work, to check it or reverse it. Crea- tion, instead of being completed at a certain prehistoric date, is going on before our eyes. The hundred million years of organic evolution, which gave us man's body, are as nothing compared with the cooperative evolution in the life of each human child, which gives us his mind, trained or untrained, stunted and warped and marred, or developed and broadened and ennobled. vin. BUILDING THE WORLD OF THOUGHT. When I enter the University Library, I have a realizing sense of the powers of the human mind. On the shelves are books and periodicals ranging over the whole field of human interest. Each year new knowledge is added to the rapidly growing accumulation. Scientific reviews record from month to month the work of thousands of investigators, in every civilized country. Man has not been content to take the world for granted. His mental adjustment to the Universe has been of a very active kind. There is nothing to suggest the unfold- ing of a Universal Mind, the varied consciousness of one instantaneous Knower, a mosaic of Thought whose pat- tern is eternally complete in what Koyce terms "the unity of the Absolute Experience." The picture we gain is rather that of a multitude of independent creators, slowly becoming acquainted with the Universe in which they are placed, and building out of it a world of objects and values and laws. Man does not make the Universe, but he makes it known. ^ Let us look more closely at the nature of this adjust- ment. It begins in a most practical fashion. The world in which man lives contains various forces and bodies with which he comes in contact. Light waves, impinging on *Any one wishing to follow further the themes treated in this chapter might consult with profit: W. B. Pillsbury, Fundamentals of Psychology, 1916; James R. Angell, Psychology, 1904; Hugo Mjiinsterberg, Psychology, 1914; C. S. Sherrington, Integrative Ac- tion of the Nervous System, 1911; Boris Sidis, Foundations of Nor- mal and Abnormal Psychol., 1914; Joseph Jastrow, The Suhcorir scious, 1906; Kate Gordon, Esthetics, 1909. 77 78 CHAOS OE COSMOS? these bodies, are reflected toward him. Through the evolu- tion of his animal ancestors in such a world, the human child inherits machinery for receiving and recording such contacts with the Universe, and reacting to them in definite ways. Innumerable reactions teach him to correlate these sense impressions, to compare them, to generalize them into recepts and concepts. And by means of these con- •cepts, which language makes it possible to name, he forms his interpretation of the world, in terms of things and their qualities. This interpretation is so familiar that we are likely to take it for granted, regard it as preordained and always existing. On the contrary, it is man's own creation, a mental mechanism, a series of intellectual short- cuts, which enable him to know the Universe and adapt himself to it. The Universe supplies the raw material for thought: light and sound waves, forces and masses, rela- tions and sequences. Man works up this raw material into objects and attributes, judgments of value, associations, inferences. It is a very real cooperation between Man and his Environment. The correspondence of our ideas with the external world is not a preestablished but an achieved harmony. What a mighty creation is a word. What magic power it brings. To pick out an object from experience, or the experience itself, make an abstraction of it, choose a cer- tain sound to be its name. Merely by speaking that name, to call up in the minds of one's fellows a picture of the object, with all its dreaded or desired qualities. To name a thing, to have an idea of it, is to detach it from the confused unknown, to gain a certain advantage over it, to possess it, to make it a stepping-stone to other dis- coveries and possessions. The idea is man's own, having no existence until he formed it, with no meaning except such as he chooses to give. The word was not, until, by the exercise of a god-like power, man spoke and it be- gan to be, as his messenger and servant. And through these simple but serviceable tools of thought, shared as part BUILDING THE WOELD OF THOUGHT n of the conunon stock of horde or tribe, and constantly increased and perfected by new experiences, the savage is able to live his life, to predict the future, to subdue the earth to his need, to develop customs and institutions and sagas and myths. And Civilization is merely the improvement of these same mental tools, which the race has been using for some 400,000 years. We still pick out certain facts of experi- ence, which are revealed to us through our God-given sense impressions, and call tiiem things, attributing to them certain qualities and behavior. We still create new names for new experiences. But the rapid accumulation of knowledge, recorded now in written and printed speech, has not only increased our supply of tools. It has enabled us to use them more accurately. We have formed new abstractions, and made wider generalizations. We group our experiences into general laws. By means of these laws, which are as truly man's creation as the first spoken word, we are able to make new predictions, to know the forces of the Universe and harness them for our use, to test and correct our sense impressions, to construct physical mechanisms that open the way to further power and achievement, to expand sagas into literatures, and myths into philosophies. Man has begun to know and utilize the Universe. But it is only a beginning. A hundred years hence the books on our library shelves, as a picture of the real world, will seem as crude as the books of a century ago appear to the scholars of today. Knowledge is a means to an end, and that end is man's adjustment to the Universe. We must know it, for we live in it. We must know its physical forces before we can harness them. We must know its moral forces, before we can shape our lives and our institutions aright. Of this I shall speak at length in the closing section of our book. With the growing specialization in scientific research and teaching, there is grave danger that we shall lose sight of the Universe itself, of which these subjects are but 80 CHAOS OR COSMOS? "abstracted phases and elements." The aim of a finished education, as Small pointed out over twenty years ago, is "conscious conformity of individuals to the coherent cos- mic reality of which they are parts. Until our pedagogy rests upon a more intelligent cosmic foundation, and espe- cially upon a more complete synthesis of social philosophy, we can hardly expect curricula to correspond with the essential conditions to which human action must learn to conform." ^ The cooperation between Man and God in mental labor has an even more intimate phase. Activity of the brain represents a definite transformation of energy. A stimulus is transmitted along the branches of a neurone, and across the gaps that separate it from other neurones. The neces- sary energy must be supplied by the oxidation of carbon in the nerve cell proper. Active thought means increased blood pressure and temperature on the surface of the brain. Thus all mental processes may be considered as joint operations, between the thinker who initiates or controls the train of thought, and the Universe whose forces make such activity possible. Our mental life may be passive as well as active, in- volving no conscious effort and no noticeable increase in blood pressure. In fact, by far the larger part of it is of this character. Probably the neurones of the brain cortex are in a state of incessant activity, even during the hours of sleep. They are constantly transforming energy and transmitting stimuli. Just what proportion of the result- ing thought product is contributed respectively by God and by man, we do not know. It is clear that man, in his thought life, whether active or passive, is intimately dependent on the Universe. But while much of his think- ing appears to be done for him, in the subconscious opera- tions of the brain, the man himself, in his conscious per- sonality, makes a definite contribution to the final result. Every person engaged in literature or research learns •Albion W. Small, Am, J. of Sooiol., 2, 840, 1897. BUILDING THE WORLD OF THOUGHT 81 to distinguish these two kinds of mental operations. Dur- ing his waking hours, he is conscious of having certain experiences, of talking with other men, of reading printed pages, of making definite experiments, of wrestling with problems of thought or expression. But all this time, be- neath the threshold of consciousness, another stream of mental life is flowing. It is fed bj his conscious thinking and experience, charged with images, ideas, impressions. The subconscious life, while preserving these intact as memories (or whatever lies at the basis of memory), also digests and develops them. And from this second stream of mental activity, as from a subterranean river, thoughts keep rising into consciousness. They may be mere feelings and prejudices. They may be remembered scenes or words. Sometimes the resurgence takes the form of matured ideas or new forms of phrasing. In my own experience, I wrestle for days over a problem, or leave a piece of work half finished and unsatisfying. After retiring for the night, or in the morning when only half awake, the prob- lem is solved for me, the troublesome paragraph started with one or two telling sentences. The inspiration may come in the day time — when walking along the street, listening to a sermon, busy with mechanical tasks, work- ing in my study on an entirely different subject. All my writing, when thoughts flow freely, seems like the work of an amanuensis, putting on paper the ideas that crowd up from the "undermind." Probably all intuition and inspiration, in religion or literature, in science or practical affairs, is of this charac- ter. Literary history furnishes some extreme cases. Many of my readers are doubtless familiar with the story of Julia Ward Howe's Battle Hymn of the Republic. The visit to the Virginia battle-fields late in JsTovember, 1861. The singing of "John Brown's Body" on the slow drive home. James Freeman Clarke's suggestion that she write new words to that good air. Waking in the gray dawn of the following morning, the lines of the Battle Hymn formed 82 CHAOS OK COSMOS? themselves in her mind. Fearful lest she should forget them she seized pen and paper, and scrawled the words almost without seeing what she did. When Mrs. Howe rose at daylight and dressed herself, she had no recollection of what had passed. Seeing some writing on the tahle she took it up, and recognized the words of her own poem : "Mine eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord." 3 Elliot has called attention to Herhert Spencer's "extraor- dinary power to see the essential elements in any hetero- geneous mixture of events. He carved out a principle, which immediately introduced order and method, where previously there had heen nothing but a hopeless jumble. . . . His methods of thinking and writing were wholly conformable with his character. He no more thought of sitting down to think than he thought of sitting down to read. In the course of promiscuous idling he would come across some significant fact or idea, which very likely he would temporarily forget. But later on it would be liable to turn up in his mind again, well on the way to being a full-fledged principle. And once the principle got rooted, relevant facts would come flying from all quar- ters, until on all that subject quite a considerable amount of knowledge had been more or less unintentionally accu- mulated. These processes apparently occurred with spe- cial strength while taking walks : on these occasions he was often absent-minded and noticed little of what was going on about him. He had of course immense natural con; centration, but it was never brought on by an effort of will. His method of writing was of the same kind. The written matter flowed naturally from him, without con- scious effort, and it was very little revised after being written. Unlike John Stuart Mill, who wrote out his * Bookman, 32, 306, 1910. Francis Colton's version, also from Mrs. Howe herself, adds some interesting particulars; Current Lit., 49, 677, 1910. BUILDINa THE WORLD OF THOUGHT 83 Logic many times before he was satisfied with it, Spencer never re-wrote." ^ Mill's method of work is far more common. I have cited these exaggerated cases, because they bring out a process that is going on to some extent in all mental activity. The success of the thinker depends on his main- taining right relations between the conscious and the sub- conscious. To neglect or starve the subconscious leads to mental sterility. At the other extreme, the failure to control one's intuitions means weak or illogical generaliza- tion, somewhat parallel with the unchecked freedom of the subconscious in our dreams. In successful thinking, the conscious personality does three principal things. In the first place it feeds the sub- conscious, by wide observation or reading. Mrs. Howe's poem grew out of long study of the best literary forms, and the brooding of a great personality over the crisis of her nation. Spencer's general laws came from a mind packed with miscellaneous information. Inspiration on a prob- lem comes only after a period of hard study on that prob- lem. Secondly, subconscious operations, to be fruitful, require the constant practice of similar conscious opera- tions. The Battle Hymn resulted from the writing of many previous poems. Spencer's particular line of work had become an inveterate habit, which enlarged our knowl- edge in various fields. The third function of conscious- ness is definite control. ITew ideas are likely to spring up capriciously and without effort. To utilize an idea, how- ever, to develop and phrase it properly, ordinarily re- quires the focussing of attention on that idea to the exclu- sion of everything else. Long practice makes it possible even to regulate the flow of ideas, so that the subcon- scious may be trained to work for us along one consciously chosen line. Mental enrichment, practice and concen- tration are the conditions of good thinking, and the at- *Hugh S. R. Elliot, Herhert Spenoer, 1917, 62. 84 CHAOS OR COSMOS? taininent of these three things should be the goal of all education. Whether subconscious ideas are at times in- spired directly by the God who is back of all the opera- tions of the Universe, it is impossible to prove or disprove. The religious attitude of calmness and confidence, however, is conducive to the best thinking. The constructive work of the human mind is shown most clearly in the field of Art. All aesthetic pleasure has a physical basis. Light waves of different lengths give rise to the sensations of color. And colors and their com- binations have a varying emotional accompaniment. The pleasurable sensations of tone and overtone are due to the primary and secondary vibrations produced in the air by a sonorous body. A combination of tones is more enjoyable when the vibrations are in a certain ratio, as in the 1 to 2 of the octave, or the 3 to 4 of the fourth. The pleasure in bodily or vocal rhythm is largely muscular in origin. It is probable that line drawing and symmetrical arrange- ment bring a similar bodily reaction, what Grosse calls "sympathetic reproduction." As man lived his life, and found his varied activities bringing him these pleasurable sensations, he came to reproduce them for their own sake. He developed art, in order to objectify his emotion and express it to his fellows.^ We see the beginning of the process in the rhythm of savage dances and songs. Through the manipulation of line and color, men were able to make pictures, as on the cave walls of prehistoric France, that would inspire definite suggestions and emotions. Still later came the use of simple tone combinations in crude musical instruments, recitative, and choral singing. All art is social in origin and in expression. Histor- ically man does not find beauty in the sounds or objects of the world around him. He makes satisfying tones or pictures, and later begins to apply his idea of beauty to !N'ature itself. The beauty is not, as with Hegel, an expres- sion of the Absolute Thought in the concrete facts of the •Y. Hirn, Origins of Art, 1900, 301. BUILDING THE WORLD OF THOUGHT 85 world. It is rather a mental synthesis by the individual man, the product of his creative imagination. What we shall call beautiful is a social standard, determined by the taste of the group to which we belong.^ The modem artist uses the same physical media as the savage, and for the same end. He seeks to give his artistic feelings an outlet, in a form that may be shared by others. He expresses emotion in the art language, and by the alphabet of signs, which the world has learned to read. With the growth of knowledge and taste, the improvements in mechanism and technique, man's creative power has attained a new perfection of harmony in tone or color or form, a fulness of emotional expression. The artist differs from the average man in degree rather than in kind. We see a strong emotional temperament, and an unusual power of imagination, whether auditory, visual, or motor. Acquaintance with standard forms strengthens this primary endowment. Practice brings the artist his power of concentration. His mind is constantly creating, even when the creation is subconscious. Mozart's trained faculty enabled him to think in terms of musical compositions. The quintette in the Magic Flute is said to have come to him while playing a game of billiards. Croce tells us how "Leonardo shocked the prior of the con- vent delle Grazie by standing for days together opposite the ^Last Supper' without touching it with his brush. He remarked of this attitude ^that men of the most lofty genius, when they are doing the least work, are then the most active, seeking invention with their minds.' The painter is a painter, because he sees what others only feel or catch a glimpse of, but do not see." "^ But all appreciation of music or painting is essentially creative. The power vested in trained minds makes it possible for them to reproduce the synthesis first given by the artistic genius. •James H. Tufts, Genesis of Aesthetic Categories, Univ. of Chi- cago Pub's, 1903, vol. 3. 'B. Croce, Theory of Aesthetic, Eng. trans., 1909, 16. 86 CHAOS OE COSMOS? I have tried in this and the preceding chapter to steer a safe course between the various psychological schools. Our real interest has been in the product of thought, rather than the process. Whatever particular theories we may hold as to the conscious and the subconscious mental life, two facts stand out in clear relief. The first is contingency. The second is the power of independent creation. The philosopher in his study, the business man in his office, the workman at his lathe, the surgeon at the operating table, the artist, the musician — all are absolutely dependent on God. Apart from the Universe itself, without the energy exchanges in the brain cells, the nerve reactions, and per- haps the direct inspiration, their work would be impossible. But their work does change the result. Men are able to control their mental resources. By making and utilizing ideas and laws, they add something that was not on the earth before. They make man's adjustment more com- plete, his life more satisfying. A writer in Science Progress has branded as intellectual criminals "those who remain ignorant when they should learn, thoughtless when they should think, and sunk in superstitions when they should reason." ^ If Julia Ward Howe and Herbert Spen- cer and Da Vinci and Mozart had not lived, if they had developed lesser personalities, or failed to train their powers and use them to the full, the modem world would lose a heritage of patriotism and truth and beauty. •11, 136, 1916. IX. COMPLETING THE PHYSICAI. WORLD. To a certain extent the physical Universe is complete. Its laws do not change. The action of forces is definite, uniform, predictable. Two separated bodies always tend to gravitate together. Everywhere light travels in a vacuum a certain number of miles a second. The same number of electrons, grouped in the same way about a nucleus of positive electricity, show the properties of an atom of oxygen. Why natural forces should act in this way and not otherwise, we do not know. "I accept the Universe," said Margaret Fuller. There is no alternative. The world of ^N'ature being arranged in a particular way, our first duty is one of adaptation. Whether the present order is due to design, or whether organisms are fitted to the earth because they have developed in response to its conditions, this planet is a good place for man to live. He needs only to know his environment and adjust himself to it And such honest, faithful, courageous adjustment is a cooperation of man with the Universe. The uniformity of action in this sphere is of immense advantaga In fact, our life would be impossible on any other basis. How long could we exist in a world of dis- order, where the succession of the seasons could not be pre- dicted, where combustion was really spontaneous instead of following fixed laws, where sometimes chemical elements would combine, and at other times, under exactly the same conditions, combination failed ? Such a world might suit the savage, but for civilized man it would be a bad dream ; it could not be a reality. 87 88 CHAOS OR COSMOS? As Koosevelt has said, the forces of ITature do not threaten ; they operate. It is no ground for complaint that fire bums and cold freezes. Those who live in an earth- quake belt, must expect occasional earthquakes. Those who live where cyclones occur, accept the risk of having property and perhaps life destroyed by this means. If a man builds his home at the foot of a live volcano, and the volcano erupts and buries the man and his family under a mass of lava, the man is responsible, not the Universe. In any part of the world, the rainfall or snowfall, the alterna- tions of heat or cold, while varying from year to year, vary only within definite limits. Those who do not like that average rainfall or that temperature range, are free to move elsewhere. We witness many such hegiras, espe- cially among the well-to-do. But in history the average family, instead of fleeing from conditions, has adapted it- self to them. Through the use of fire and clothing, pre- historic man was able to leave the tropics and follow the receding glaciers, like the animals that he hunted. Emi- gration, after filling the more, fertile areas of the tem- perate zone, has swept on into less favored regions. Men have learned to wrest a living from apparently barren soil, and even to irrigate the desert. Famine and disaster have taken an awful toll. But the conquest of the earth through adaptation, has trained the race in courage, in endurance, in resourcefulness, in thrift. I have seen this process at first hand, both among the 'New England hills and on one of the last timber frontiers of the West. The virility of the American is still the virility of the pioneer and his descendants. The strongest of our immigrants are those who in the Old World wrestled with I^ature as Jacob wrestled with God for His blessing. That Man has suc- ceeded in his adjustment to the Universe, is shown by the vastness of the earth's present population, and its spread from the Equator to the Arctic circles. But Man has not merely adapted himself to the earth as he finds it His mental equipment has enabled him to de- COMPLETING THE PHYSICAL WORLD 89 velop and complete the earth. He has shared the Divine task of physical creation. The first tools and weapons were levers with which to move the world, and provide a richer and more dependable livelihood. The economic evolution of primitive man is one of the most fascinating stories in the history of the race. Invention and accumulation make for the advance of certain tribes, only to be wiped out again by disease or war. After many thousand years, a definite advance is registered in the domestication of the cow and the sheep, the development of agriculture, such arts as pottery and weaving. Weapons and tools are im- proved. Mines and factories are opened, for working flint and other valued articles. Houses become more elaborate. Such engineering feats are attempted as the circle of Stone- henge. As population grows denser, Man^s creative adjust- ment to the physical world, always social in its character, becomes more highly organized. Bronze implements are introduced, to a civilization already well under way. Min- ing and manufacturing bring specialization ; men begin to follow distinct trades. Commerce increases. Cities spring up. Then iron, and steel ; the rest of the story is recorded history. Men find themselves on an island, separated from the mainland by broad rivers. They learn to cross these by canoes, by ferry boats. Then they throw bridges over them; they tunnel beneath their surface. They cross oceans in ships, driven first by wind power and later by steam. Trails give place to roads, and these to cemented highways. Men lay rails across a continent for steam and electric traffic, filling valleys and boring through moun- tains. They flash messages around the world by wires, and even without wires. They learn to navigate under the water and through the air. They build structures of many stories, to which they are lifted swiftly against the force of gravity. They harness the energy stored in water- falls and coal, in molecules and electrons, and use it to heat and light their houses and turn the wheels in their 90 CHAOS OE COSMOS? factories. Whatever articles are needed to supply their wants, tools are ready, and tools to make tools. What hath Man wrought, in this last hundred years. Human achieve- ment in the completion of the physical world, is an epic, far grander and worthier than the deeds of Homeric heroes or mediaeval knights. And the work of creation goes for- ward, at an ever accelerating rate. Man has succeeded, not in spite of IN'ature, but because of ISTature. The forces of the physical world were on his side. They have been friendly, not hostile. Man has been able to work with the Universe, because the Universe ever was working with man. The material and power are sup- plied him ; what he contributes is their knowledge and con- trol. Through the oxidation of wood or coal, for example, people develop heat for their comfort or convenience. The laws of Physics and Chemistry are not broken. The equations of energy are unaltered. Man brings together forces and force-centers that existed previously. But he brings them together in new arrangements, and for the accomplishment of new ends. Every workman is a creator, helping to direct Divine forces, working with God upon Divine materials. The miner, digging coal or iron, is following a holy calling. Every stroke of his pick is an act of unconscious com- munion with the Universe. His task is sacred, it is part of the social order. The comfort, the very life of God's children, depends on the product of his labor. To shirk is to prove traitor to man and to God. To do one's best is to hear, if one will, the "Well done, good and faithful servant." So with the laborer in the blast furnace, turn- ing out steel for human use. The mechanic, making what God wants made. The worker in the building trades, help- ing to house man and his varied industries. The ship- builder, the boilermaker, doing their part in the organiza- tion which make human commerce possible. The engineer or the seaman, making commerce actual. The farmer, feeding the world, of whom our next chapter will have COMPLETING THE PHYSICAL WOELD 91 more to tell. The miller, putting the farmer's product into available form. The tradesman and his varied helpers, dis- tributing the goods that people need. The housewife, pre- paring what her home should have of food and cleanliness and comfort. There are no secular callings. Steam and electricity are holy, and boiler plates and bolts of cloth and shoes and sacks of flour and dressed meats and dishes and laundered clothes. To come in contact with the objects and forces of the world of every day, is to come in contact with God in His incessant activity. The place whereon we stand, in factory or store or kitchen, is holy ground. From a feudal aristocracy we have inherited the idea of a certain stigma attaching to hand labor. Such an attitude is virtual atheism. In itself hand labor is not degrading but ennobling. It should be practiced in our leisure hours and taught to our children. The mere contact with physi- cal materials brings a satisfaction and a peace which are in the truest sense religious. Athletic sports are of the greatest importance, from the standpoint of health and rec- reation. But in the education of a people, sport cannot take the place of honest work. There can be no real democ- racy without a general participation in physical labor, as something honorable and intrinsically rewarding. Bul- garia, under Premier Stamboliisky, has introduced the plan of drafting young men, when they reach the age of conscription, for a period of education and service as laborers rather than soldiers. William Morris defined real art as the expression by man of his pleasure in labor. He might have said the same of true religion. In useful work well done are all the elements of communion and worship and service. Cre- ative tasks, when seen in a larger perspective, bring a cer- tain self-forgetfulness. We have an example of this in the almost superhuman effort that can be made under stress of some great cause, as in making munitions or digging trenches. Absorption in some piece of creative work may bring the same oblivion to time and weariness and bodily 92 CHAOS OR COSMOS? need. Sometliing of the same attitude is possible in normal labor. Outside of muscular fatigue, what tires us is not the work we are doing, but tbe work we are not doing. Our mind is constantly chafing to be doing something else. On the other hand, work that is interesting is seldom tir- ing. In this case we are truly cooperating with God. Our mind is working in harmony with the Divine processes that go on in brain, nerve and muscle cells. That religion in its broadest sense will ever become a general and sufficient motive for labor, is open to question. The chief compulsion has been and will continue to be economic necessity. But the sense of cooperation with the Universe for social ends may be made a supplementary motive, dignifying mechanical tasks, giving a new sacred- ness to materials, glorifying routine through the conscious- ness of the end to be attained, developing the satisfaction of craftsmanship. To release this powerful supplementary motive in me- dianical labor, many things are necessary. Hours of labor must be reduced below the point of physical exhaustion, and the fatigue due to monotony or nervous strain relieved by change of work or periods of rest. Proper provision must be made for lighting, ventilation, safety and comfort. The return in wages must not only provide a decent living, but be fairly representative of the worker's share in pro- duction. There must be security of tenure; the worker cannot be haunted by the fear of losing his job, or of be- coming dependent in old age. Some means must be de- vised for giving an intelligent interest in the processes and management of the plant. Home conditions and the opportunity for wholesome recreation are of almost equal importance. And the worker must have the skill, the con- trol over his own powers and over natural forces, the use of the best labor-saving machinery available, and the eco- nomical placing of materials and tools, which will make for the most efficient production. On no other terms can the workman have the consciousness of being a creator COMPLETING THE PHYSICAL WOELD 93 rather than a drudge. Some of these conditions society at large is securing, through legislative enactment. Still more powerful is the recognition by the more progressive plants of the human factor in industry.-^ Booker Washing- ton, in one of his books, pleads for the industrial educa- tion which will "teach the Wegro how not to drudge in his work." He contrasts "the S'egro in the South toiling through a field of oats with an old-fashioned reaper, vdth the white man on a modem farm in the West, sitting upon a modern Taarvester,' behind two spirited horses, with an umbrella over him, using a machine that cuts and binds the oats at the same time, — doing four times as much work as the black man with one-half the labor." ^ Under any approach to ideal conditions, physical labor, like virtue, is its own reward. It brings returns which cannot be reckoned in dollars. "The real wages of life," says Atkins, "are in the strength which attends happy toil, in the comradeship born of a common endeavor for great ends — there is no finer friendship than the friend- ship of those who work together — in the sense of usefulness which attends all service and in the joy of creation which God shares with all good workmen. We are paid for our work in the happiness and well- being of others, in wholesome weariness which makes rest a blessing, in the hunger which gives a flavor to bread and the thirst which makes a cup of cold water the very gift of God. Discipline and skill, patience and power are coin struck from a mint whose gold is never tarnished — these also are the wages of toil, and beyond all these is charac- ter — the continuation and revelation of the great reward of labor in personality itself." ^ The relations between Man and the Universe must be *This subject will be taken up more fully in Chapters 18 and 19. See Frederick S. Lee, The Human Machine and Industrial Ef- ficiency, 1918; Josephine Goldmark, Fatigue and Efficiency, 1912; Frank B. and Lillian M. Gilbreth, Fatigue Study, 2nd ed., 1919. ^Future of the Am. Negro, 1899, 62. •G. G. Atkins, Congregationaliat, Dec. 25, 1919. 94 CHAOS OK COSMOS? learned, not through an abstract discussion of the nature of human consciousness, or of freedom versus determinism, but through a study of the difference which the individual man is able to make in the net result. That he is not a mere cog in the cosmic machine is shown by the reverse fact, that man may refuse to cooperate in the work of cre- ation, or even destroy that which has been created by others. He may set fire to a building, or dynamite a printing of- fice or a mine. He may limit production by unscientific or inhuman management, or by sabotage or a policy of "ca* canny." He may live in idleness on the productive work of others. He may hold land or water-power or mineral deposits undeveloped, in order to secure a larger unearned increment. He may plunge the world in a war that wastes more life and property than can be replaced in a genera- tion. For such antics the theory of the Absolute offers no explanation. But both creation and destruction fit into the idea of a Universe which, since the emergence of the human species, has become a Pluralism rather than a Monism, a Democracy rather than an Absolute Monarchy. DEVELOPING THE FOOD SUPPLY. What Man has done to perfect the organic world, will be seen if we trace the pedigree of some of the commonest articles on our table. I do not intend in this chapter to give practical directions for farming, but merely to review some examples of human creation and control which are no less remarkable because the end-products are so fa- miliar. We may begin with the meat and dairy products. Man's domestication of wild cattle in I^eolithic times did much to change the course of social evolution. Wealth came to be '^pecuniary," as with the early Latin, derived from pecus, cattle. By 3000 B. C. the Egyptians had not only developed a hornless from a horned breed, but had achieved a selective milk type.^ If it is the beefsteak we are considering, the story is probably that of the Shorthorn breed. It goes back to the valley of the Tees, in the English county of Durham, and the September day, in the year 1786, when Charles Colling of Ketton Hall made his historic visit to the home of his friend Maynard of Eryholme. As he and his wife rode up, their attention was at once attracted by a hand- some roan cow which Miss Maynard was milking. Be- fore the visit was over, this animal, a fine representative of the old Teesdale stock, was purchased for 28 guineas and renamed Lady Maynard, or, as an admiring country- side came to call her, "the beautiful Lady Maynard." She was destined to become the ancestress of the improved * Jas. O. Breasted, 8ci. Monthly, 9, 422, 1919. 95 96 CHAOS OK COSMOS? Shorthorns. Still more important was the blood of a bull, bought by Charles Colling for 10 guineas, and sold after two years for 8 on account of his small size. He had no name until his progeny began to attract attention, when he was named Hubback, from a later owner. This bull of posthumous fame showed symmetry and even distribution of flesh, and a remarkably quick response to feeding. The union of these two strains, under the method of close in- breeding which Colling had learned from the great pioneer, Kobert Bakewell of Dishley, produced the beef type he was seeking. Such bulls as Favorite, his grandson Comet, which sold afterward for $5000, and "the Durham Ox," which reached a weight of nearly 3400 pounds, made the improved breed famous throughout England. Still fur- ther developed by his brother Eobert Colling, and by Thomas Booth and Thomas Bates, the Shorthorns or Dur- hams began to make their way to America, where they were to prove the favorite dual purpose breed. The fas- cinating and at times sensational story should be read in the pages of Mr. Alvin Sanders.^ Man has produced equally striking results with dairy cattle. In 1910 the average annual production of the American dairy cow was estimated by the Bureau of Ani- mal Industry at 4000 pounds of milk, and 160 pounds of butter fat. Probably a quarter of the cows did not pay for the cost of keeping them, and nearly one-fourth more failed to yield a profit. To correct this situation, three lines of improvement are being followed: feeding, selec- tion, and breeding. Experiments in Iowa showed that good feeding, as contrasted with poor feeding, more than doubled the total yield of young stock over a two-year period. The aim in scientific feeding is to supply each cow with the largest amount of grain she can use in milk production without putting on flesh. The rough and ready rule is to feed one pound of grain for every three pounds * Shorthorn Cattle, 2nd ed., 1901; At the Sign of the Stock Yard Inn, 1915. DEVELOPING THE FOOD SUPPLY 97 of milk produced, in addition to all tlie roughage the cow will eat up clean. Warmth, ventilation and general peace and contentment are also of great importance. Since individual cows vary greatly in their capacity for utiliz- ing food above their maintenance, regular testing is neces- sary in order to weed out the less productive stock. At the Georgia Experiment Station, the best cow in the herd gave during twelve months 7,968 pounds of milk, which produced $115.44 of butter. The poorest cow gave only 2,788 pounds of milk, with a butter value of $41.63. Be- sides selecting individuals with the best production records, much can be accomplished by breeding up the herd. Let me refer again to experiments in Iowa. The introduction of pure-bred Holstein sires brought an increased produc- tion in the heifers, at an average age of three years and a half, over their scrub mothers at an average age of six years, of 71% in milk, and 42% in butterfat.^ While the production by good grade herds compares favorably with herds made up entirely of thoroughbreds, the possibilities in breeding can be seen from the world records made by pure-bred cattle. The Holstein cow Segis Pietertje Prospect, recently completed a year's production which showed 37,381.4 pounds of milk, or an average of about 60 quarts a day. At least six cows have passed the 30,000 mark. The butterfat record for this breed is held by a Canadian cow which rejoices in the name of Bella Pontiac, with 1,270 lbs., which is reckoned as 1,587.5 lbs. butter. For the Guernseys, Mume Cowan gave 24,008 lbs. milk, and Countess Prue 1,103.28 lbs. butterfat. The Ayrshire, Garclaugh May Mischief, produced 25,329 lbs. milk; and Lily of Willowmoor 955.56 lbs. butterfat. The Jersey records are held by Passport, with 19,694.8 lbs. milk; and Plain Mary with 1,040 lbs. butterfat.* Man •Iowa Agric. Exp. Sta., Bull. 165, 1916; Clarence B. Lane, Records of Dairy Cows, U. S. Dept. Agr., Bur. An. Industry, Bull. 75, 1905. * Breeds of Dairy Cattle, U. S. D. A., Farmers Bulletin 893, 1917, records corrected to Dec. 1, 1921. The Holstein milk record has been broken twice within two years. 98 CHAOS OE COSMOS? has gone far in perfecting the cow as a machine for turn- ing concentrated food materials into milk and fat. Breed- ing and feeding have produced similar records for hogs and poultry. Normal milk contains various types of bacteria, one of which, the lactis acidi, causes fermentation with the mild acid flavor that we enjoy in our butter. In order to provide this uniform flavor, the butter-maker has pas- teurized his cream to destroy the active bacteria of all sorts. He then adds a pure culture of the lactis acidi, al- lows the cream to ferment under its influence, churns it, works out the surplus water, salts and colors it to suit our taste, and the butter is kept at a low temperature until it is ready for the table. The creation of our cheese is some- what more complicated. The cheese-maker is unable, in most cases, to make use of pasteurization, but he secures the desired fermentation by selecting whole milk in which lactis acidi predominate, and adding a pure culture. Ren- nin, extracted from the digestive stomach of a calf, is then introduced, to assist by its enzymes the digestion of the curd. The resulting flavor is due to some biologic action, not yet understood, but stimulated by the acids of fermen- tation, which are under definite control, and by the salt which is added. By changing the method of production, in some cases adding cultures of certain molds, the cheese- maker is able to vary the flavor and consistency, and pro- duce over four hundred varieties.^ Our honey is a plant secretion, whose cane sugar is changed to grape sugar in the bee's body. Its flavor is determined by the flowers on whicTi the bees forage. The aim of the bee-keeper has been to increase production. The Italian species is most generally used, owing to their comparative gentleness and disease-resistance, and the in- creased laying power of the queen. As all worker eggs ■E. G. Hastings, in Marshall's Microbiology, 1917, 408-437; C. F. Doane and H. W. Lawson, Varieties of Cheese, Bur. Animal Ind., Bun, 105, 1908. DEYELOPING THE FOOD SUPPLY 99 are laid by the queen, and the life of the worker bee during the active season is not more than five or six weeks, all that is necessary for changing the breed is to secure a pure-bred Italian queen, which may be sent long distances by mail. The increase of honey production is secured through me- chanical devices and manipulation. A hive is constructed with movable frames, on which are stretched sheets of wax foundation, stamped so as to furnish the bees with the six- sided bases of the proper size for building worker cells. The objective in modem bee-keeping is the strongest pos- sible colony at the time of the main honey flow. Colonies of 100,000 bees are not unusual. To secure this, it is necessary to eliminate swarming. Instead of allowing the bees to waste their energy building up new colonies, man keeps them at work strengthening the main colony and gathering supplies. By the use of these methods, I have been able to secure an average surplus of 100 pounds of extracted honey per colony in a normal season. A yield of 200 pounds is common, and over 400 pounds has occa- sionally been realized as an average. Millions of tons of nectar go to waste annually, through the lack of honey bees to harvest it, under man's control. That such control is still inadequate, is shown by the fact that the average yield per colony in the United States is only 45 pounds of honey. Most of the smaller apiaries fall very much below this figure. Our wheaten bread, if made from Minneapolis flour, has been ground from hard spring wheat, grown in the Red River valley. And thereby hangs an interesting tale of plant breeding. This most important of all cereal crops has been cultivated throughout historic times. The plant is in general self -fertilizing, allowing for the selection of pure lines by pedigree culture. W. M. Hays, of the Min- nesota Experiment Station, began in 1888 to try out strains of wheat gathered from the United States and foreign countries. The Blue Stem and Bed Fife, which had be* come indigenous to Minnesota were found most satisfac- 100 CHAOS OE COSMOS? tory. In ten years' time, out of 552 wheats grown in trial plots, often from a single kernel, four hardy varieties had been secured, with a high gluten content and an average yield of 22.5 bushels per acre. At that time the producing capacity for the country as a whole was about 17 bushels. But the experimenter was not yet satisfied. From the best types already secured, 400 grains of wheat were planted in single hills in 1892, and a new series of 31 varieties secured. By 1894 about a pint of seed was available for each of these. At the end of the decade, the best of the new varieties, Minnesota 163 and 169, were beginning to be supplied to farmers. Their yield was approximately 28 bushels, making possible an increase of over 10 bushels per acre for the entire I^orthwest.^ The maize which enters our diet, directly or indirectly, differs from wheat in that it is normally cross-fertilized. At the Connecticut Experiment Station, D. F. Jones, con- tinuing the work begun by East, has been able to isolate about a dozen pure lines. These in themselves lack vigor, but may be crossed to furnish new combinations of desir- able qualities. The greatest success has been reached with a double cross. Mr. Jones showed me the small shrivelled ears of two strains of white dent com, and the cross made of these, somewhat larger but still shrivelled. By com- bining with a similar cross of yellow dent strains, he se- cured a large perfect ear, which in the trial plots yielded an average of 112 bushels of shelled com. The average yield on Connecticut farms, the highest in the country, is 44 bushels, the best farmers reaching about 75. The best record of the hybrid varieties used in the trial plots was 92 bushels. The 20% increase of the new combination was due to the elimination of bad heredity. Each plant produced an ear of corn, and this ear was perfect, ensur- ing a uniform production of grain. To take advantage of the new method, it will be necessary for the farmer to maintain special seed plots, securing a small quantity of • Univ. of Minn. Ag. Exper. Station, Bull 62, 1899. DEVELOPING THE FOOD StPFL*' ' *' * 101 seed from the two crosses, and planting in alternate rows. By detasseling the first row, its matured ears, fertilized by the second row, will be the desired double cross. This will furnish seed for the next year's planting,*^ The same patient, enterprising cooperation with the Universe is seen in the adaptation and improvement of plants from distant countries, like the potato and the to- mato, the navel orange, and countless garden flowers; in the grafting of improved varieties of fruit on old stocks; in the creation of new species, like the thomless edible cactus, which cost Burbank ten years of crossing and selection.® In providing these various articles of food, Man has been actively engaged in improving the soil from which they come. In recent years his aim has been to make the fullest possible use of the microorganisms which are the chief factor in soil fertility. Some of these bacteria take up free nitrogen, and render it available for plant food. The most useful are those that attach themselves to the roots of clover and other legumes. By growing clover as part of the crop rotation, the nitrogen content of the soil is not only maintained but increased. Where necessary the clover seed is innoculated before planting, and lime added to the soil to stimulate bacterial action. Other bacteria and molds decompose animal waste and dead organic matter, and thus make it again fitted for the use of plants. Careful treatment of liquid and solid ma- nure enables this process to go on with the least possible loss. The application of manure, or the plowing under of green crops, supplies the soil bacteria with the food sup- ply on which to continue their decomposition of the humus. Cultivation and drainage insure the amounts of moisture *The reader is referred to Mr. Jones' report and bibliography in J. of the Am. 8oc. of Agronomy, 12, 77, 1920. 'W. S. Harwood, New Creations in Plant Life, 1905, gives a popular review of Burbank's work. For a general review of the subject, see Babcock and Claussen, Genetics in Agricultttre, 1918, with full bibliography. io3 ' *''* *^' ^ ' "'chaos oe cosmos ? and oxygen that are necessary for tlie greatest activity of the bacteria, as well as of the plant roots, in various soils. Still other microorganisms act, either directly or indirectly, to break up rock surfaces for the formation of new soil. They also transform various mineral compounds, supply- ing, for example, most of the potash needed for rapid plant growth. This most useful work is stimulated by the application of animal or green manures or commercial fertilizers.^ Through this active and intelligent control of bacterial action, Man has been able to restore the fertility of worn- out soils, to utilize apparently barren regions for crop pro- duction, and to increase soil-fertility, in spite of the amount of food material annually drawn from the land. 'New areas are constantly being made available for farm- ing. The United States Eeclamation Service has provided water for approximately 3 million acres of arid land. The general campaign for surface and tile drainage is beginning to reclaim the 80 to 100 million acres too wet for culti- vation. Similar movements are going on in other parts of the world. As a consequence, the predictions of earlier economists are reversed, and Man appears to be increasing his food supply faster than the population increases. The species which can achieve such a result is not composed of automatons. Professor Bailey, in his inspiring book on the Holy Earth, distinguishes three stages in our relation to the planet. The collecting stage of the hunter and fisherman is succeeding by the mining stage. The wealth of the earth is exploited without thought for future generations. There is no attempt to clean up the refuse heaps and heal the scars, and thus restore man's home to its pristine order and beauty. No one who looks on hillsides devastated by wasteful lumbering, would consider man a good house- keeper. "Farming has been very much a mining pro- •MarshalFs Micyrobiology, 1917, 289-363; Chas. W. Burkett, SoiU^ 1907. DEVELOPING THE FOOD SUPPLY 103 cess, the utilizing of fertility easily at hand and the mov- ing-on to lands unspoiled of quick potash and nitrogen." Finally we enter the productive stage, where we secure supplies by controlling the conditions of growth. The American farmer is learning, like his brother in Europe, to put back into the soil as much as he takes out of it. Farming begins to have "a range of responsible and perma- nent morals." ^^ One of the great social problems of our age is to insure a succession of efficient and contented farmers. Owner- ship versus tenantry, technical training, labor and labor- saving machinery, proper marketing, adequate financial returns, good roads, social advantages — all these enter into the solution of the problem. But still more fundamental is the question of inspiration and motive. Legally the farmer may be the owner of his land. Morally he is a trustee. He is engaged, as Bailey says, in a quasi-public business. He is the agent of Society to subdue the surface of the earth and increase its productiveness. And the daily work on the farm represents what is perhaps our most in- timate contact with God's activities in the world around us. A man cannot be a good farmer unless he remembers man and remembers God.^^ There is something inherently sacred in the earth which is man's principal source of food, in the fructifying power of moisture and sun, in the living organisms, lowlier mem- bers of a common evolution, whose life man is able to con- trol, and put to use for the supplying of his needs. It is not surprising that people of an earlier culture wor- shipped many of these objects as sources of fertility, or as symbols of deity. The revival of Jesus' idea of God's ac- tivity in ^Nature should provide an outlet for this natural religious instinct, in terms that the modern world can understand. God is no longer an Absentee Landlord. He is our Partner in the great creative enterprise. The com- «L. H. Bailey, The Holy Earth, 1915, 22. "M, 32. 104 CHAOS OE COSMOS? munion which the IN'ature-lover feels in flower and field and wood, rises in the life of the gardener or farmer to the height of definite cooperation. Food is essential to life. Civilization depends upon adequate and increasing food supply. Through the control of Divine forces of repro- duction and growth, man works with God in this most elemental of all services to the race. In the words of IngersoU: "To plow is to pray; to plant is to prophesy; and the harvest answers and fulfills." XI. THE CONTROL OF HEALTH The life of any organism is contingent. It must adapt itself to the environment. It must continue to fulfill the conditions which make organic life possible. In the hu- man species this adaptation is, to some extent, under con- scious control. Successful adjustment to the Universe is health. Failure in adjustment means pain, sickness, and death. To charge suffering to God would be as absurd aa to charge Him with the burning out of the fuse of the electric lights, when my eldest son tried some scientific experiments. If positive and negative wires are joined, a short circuit results. If a man overeats, it is liable to bring on an attack of biliousness. The Universe does not cause the biliousness, any more than it caused the short cir- cuit. It merely lays down the conditions of successful or unsuccessful adjustment. The question of Health brings into sharp relief the op- posing theories of Monism and Pluralism which are before us in this section of our book. In Christian Science and similar pantheistic movements, the perfecting of the in- dividual is practically his absorption in the Universe. God is represented as Perfect Health. To abide in health one must abide in God. Since God is also, for this school, the Absolute Mind, health is primarily a matter of mental harmony or discord. The aim of the healer is to exorcise sickness, by bringing the patient into an attitude of con- fidence, harmony and oneness with the Universe of which he is a part. 105 106 CHAOS OR COSMOS? In this position there is much of truth and practical value, as we shall see. But a wider view of the field shows that the correct adjustment of man to the Universe is not merely mental. It is also structural, chemical and bac- teriological. These factors are not mutually exclusive. Rather they supplement and shade into each other. The science of Medicine, in its four-fold aspect, is part of the creative achievement of the human mind which we have al- ready discussed. In this chapter we shall apply such knowledge in some detail to the case of the individual man. Christianity, like other religions, has made valuable use of suggestion and faith. But the laws of health are laws of God. To know these laws and follow them is as much a religious duty as to follow the Ten Commandments. The forces of the Universe that make for health are at our command, but we are required to make active and intelli- gent use of them. I^ot to call on the best medical skill available, is to neglect some of the most notable coopera- tion of man with God.-^ Since the human body is a physical machine, it is neces- sary to keep that machine intact, and in proper working order. Surgery attempts to correct man's adjustment on the physical side, whenever this has been disturbed by acci- dent or other cause. A man's hand was severed in our local saw-mill, and hanging only by a piece of skin. Plac- ing him under an anaesthetic, the surgeons in the hospital *For any one who cares to follow further the subject of this chapter, the number of good books is legion. I suggest the follow- ing: John F. Binnie, Manual of Operative Surgery, 7th ed., 1916; Russell Howard, Practice of Surgery, 2nd ed., 1918; Albert P. Mathews, Physiolog. Chemistry, 2nd ed., 1916; Graham Lusk, Science of Nutrition, 3rd ed., 1917; Wm. Osier, Principles and Practice of Medicine, 8th ed., 1918; M. J. Rosenau, Preventive Medicine and Hygiene, 2nd ed., 1916; Wm. Brady, Personal Health, 1916; Irving Fisher and Eugene L. Fisk, How to Live, 1915; Edwin O. Jordan, General Bacteriology, 6th ed., 1918; Marshall's Microbi- ology, 2n(i ed., 1917; Hans Zinsser, Infection and Resistance, 2nd ed., 1918; Paul Dubois, Psychic Treatment of Nervous Disorders, Eng. trans., 1907; Wm. A. White, Prin's of Mental Hygiene, 1917; Hugo Miinsterberg, Psychotherapy^ 1909; Richard C. Cabot, What Men Live By, 1914. THE CONTROL OF HEALTH 107 set the bones, and rejoined the nerves and blood-vessels. The natural forces of growth did the rest, and the man regained almost complete use of his hand. Where a limb cannot be saved, it is amputated, and the patient fitted with an artificial leg or arm. A tumor or a diseased appendix, which threaten the loss of life, may be removed. In the case of serious burns, skin may be grafted from another part of the body, or even from a different person. Sec- tions of tissue and bone are transplanted. Transfusion of blood is also practiced. Manipulation or massage may re- store normal circulation in obstructed nerves or muscles. The improvement of defective sight, or its compensation by artificial lenses, relieves eye-strain and saves health and efficiency. The science of Dentistry, supplementing proper care of the teeth, enables us to keep this important part of our anatomy functioning even to old age, and to avoid the poisoning of the blood or of the food material which results from decay. These are but samples of the repair of man's physical machine which the advance of Science has made possible. Passive absorption in the Absolute Mind does not provide new teeth or remove adenoids or restore severed hands. Surgery can only release the forces of assimilation and growth through which God operates in the physical organism. But man must do his part, on pain of death. That man's corrective task is far from complete was shown by the examinations under the American army draft. Of two and a half million men examined under the first draft, 29 % were rejected as unfit for active mili- tary service,^ and nearly 30% of the two succeeding drafts. That is, practically a third of all American men are physically abnormal. It is interesting to note the classification made of nearly half a million disqualifica- tions reported by local boards and camp surgeons.^ "Provost Marshall General, Fvrat Report , 1918, 44. •Id., Second Report, 1919. 108 CHAOS OR COSMOS? CAUSE FOR REJECTION NUMBER PER CENT Total for all causes 467,694 100.00 Alcohol and drugs , 2,007 .43 Bones And joints 57,744 12.35 Physical under-development 39,166 8.37 Digestive system 2,476 .53 Ears 20,465 4.38 Eyes , 49,801 10.65 Flatfoot (pathological) 18,087 3.87 Genito-nrinary (venereal) 6,235 1.33 Genito-iirinary (non-venereal) . . 6,309 1.35 Heart and blood vessels 61,142 13.07 Hernia 28,268 6.04 Mental deficiency 24,514 5.24 Nervous and mental disorders 23,728 6.07 Eespiratory (tuberculous) 40,533 8.67 Kespiratory (non-tuberculous) . 7,823 1.67 Skin 12,519 2.68 Teeth 14,793 3.16 Thyroid 8,215 1.78 Tuberculosis, non-respiratory . . . — . 4,136 .88 The human body has its own power plant and its own chemical laboratory. The latter produces the enzymes needed for digesting and assimilating the different food elements, and for oxidizing the blood and lymph which are to replenish the energy of the various cells and carry off the wasta Given a fair chance, the organism will maintain its own chemical and thermal equilibrium. Air, food and water, exercise and sleep of the proper quality and amount, cleanliness, and the insulation of the body through clothing or warmed air, are all that is necessary, under normal conditions, to maintain perfect health. God provides them all. Man needs only to find them and use them, and the Divine forces in the organism will respond. The human body is indeed a temple, more sacred than any built with hands, where we may know the presence of the Highest, and witness the constant miracle of God's ac- THE CONTROL OP HEALTH 109 tivity. To be a faithful and worthy keeper of that temple is the holiest of callings. Ordinary sickness is a punish- ment for the sin of neglected duty. At times, usually through some failure on man's part, the chemical equilibrium of the body is disturbed. A change in the amount or constitution of the food elements, or in the substances naturally eliminated from the system, radically alters the activities of the tissue cells, causing them to secrete toxins, or organic poisons. These affect the organism in various ways. The nutrition of the cells becomes insufficient Their fats or carbohydrates may be used up too rapidly, bringing corresponding changes in the waste products. Sugar may accumulate in the blood, since the tissues are unable to absorb the usual amount. Con- gestion in the intestinal canal will cause further toxins to develop. The body soon gives those symptoms of sickness which are merely indications of changed metabolism. The internal nerve-endings send the danger signals which we know as pain. There may be heightened temperature, a cough, an attack of vomiting, a loss of appetite, a general feeling of lassitude. For the correction of these bad chemical conditions, man has learned the empirical use of drugs. Organs may be artificially stimulated, toxins counteracted, elimination improved. We know the end result, but practically nothing of the processes involved. The disturbance to the system is liable to be as great as the benefit. The tendency in modem Medicine is to consider such treatment merely an emergency measure. The real aim is to bring about such change in diet or other condi- tions as will give the body's own chemistry a chance to right itself. The disturbance of the chemical equilibrium of the body may be due to microorganisms. The bacteria and other types which are responsible for infectious diseases, usually enter through the mouth or nose, or through wounds in the skin. When able to multiply, they generate toxins by their action on food materials and body cells. The toxins are 110 CHAOS OE COSMOS? the direct cause of tlie disease, through the disturbance of functional activities. Man's attack on these dangerous organisms, in the interest of health, has followed four lines. In the first place, our aim is to reduce the sources of infection, by isolating persons who may be carriers, and by destroying as far as possible the bacteria themselves. Of the success of this work we shall have more to say in the next chapter. In the second place, our effort is directed toward keeping the human body in the most perfect physical condition. Man has a natural power of disease resistance. With an unbroken skin, and ducts and hair follicles in normal con- dition, there is no danger of surface infection. The mucous membranes tend to protect the inner surfaces. Although disease germs are constantly present in the mouths of healthy persons, some of them are removed mechanically, and others checked or destroyed by the acid secretions in the mouth and other organs. The leucocytes, or white corpuscles of the blood, are active devourers of bacteria, after the latter have been rendered appetizing by contact with certain chemical substances in the body fluids known as opsonins. If a tissue has been injured, the leucocytes tend to gather around the infected spot and destroy the predatory organisms. This bodily reaction is known as inflammation. It often leads to the formation of a wall of cells that localizes the disturbance. When toxins develop, the natural tendency of the body is to de- velop antitoxins to combat them. The degree of inamunity, general or specific, varies greatly with the individual, and with the state of health. Fifty per cent of all normal persons, for example, possess in their blood a natural anti- toxin for diphtheria. A person who has had an infectious disease is usually immune to it afterward. The third line of attack is the development of artificial immunity. Weakened or modified viruses known as vac- cines, usually the dead bacteria in some form, are given, to stimulate the development of natural defences against THE CONTROL OF HEALTH 111 the disease. In antiserum treatment, the protective sub- stances, instead of being developed in the body, are sup- plied from other animals, which have been innoculated with the disease. Sometimes, as in diphtheria, the serum in- jected is designed to neutralize the toxin. In other cases, for example pneumonia, the aim is to kill the bacteria themselves, directly or indirectly, and the serum does not create immunity. The advance in practice in this depart- ment of Medicine, with the knowledge of organic chemistry that lies behind it, must rank as one of the greatest achievements of Science. Fourthly, we have the treatment of the disease after it has developed. The aim is to restore, as rapidly as pos- sible, the patient's power of disease resistance. Antisenmis and germicides are applied, when these will be useful. Diet, elimination and temperature are carefully regulated, and organs stimulated to renewed activity. In other words we do, under conditions of great disadvantage, what could have been done in most cases by preventive medicine and hygiene. To cure the sick, through scientific knowledge, shows the cooperation of man with God. Yet it is co- operation of a distinctly lower order than that involved in the preservation of health. The resulting adjustment to the Universe is far less certain and complete. It is like putting out a blaze in a rubbish-littered basement, when we might have kept the building in such condition that there would have been no fire. In this connection a further employment of microor- ganisms may be mentioned. Metchnikoff made the dis- covery that ill health was due largely to putrefaction in the intestine, caused by certain bacteria. If we could re- place these bacteria by others of a harmless type, health would be promoted and life prolonged. He claimed that it was possible to do this through feeding milk soured by the Bacillus hulgaricus, Metchnikoff's theory appeared in 1907, and was widely exploited. We know now that he had picked out the wrong organism. I have been able to follow il2 CHAOS OR COSMOS? somewliat closely the series of experiments carried out in the Yale laboratories under the direction of Professor Rettger. They have demonstrated that the beneficial re- sults are due to the Bacillus acidopliilus, which is strikingly similar to the hulgaricus in appearance. When we feed milk soured by the former organism, it becomes predomi- nant in the intestine and the putrefactive bacteria are elim-« inated. The experiments were made largely with white rats. All mammalian digestion follows a common line, and similar results have already been obtained with human beings. It seems probable that human digestive troubles will in future be controlled through the Bdcillus acido- philuSj by the addition of cultures to the normal diet.* A person's state of mind is an important element in physical health. The connection is very close between con- scious or subconscious thought and the system of nerves which control secretion and the distribution of blood. An idea may bring out tears or sweat, make the mouth water, cause blushing, pallor, cold hands or feet Eecent studies have shown that calmness, contentment and pleas- ureable emotion are necessary for perfect functioning of the digestive organs. On the other hand, worry, vexation, anger, fear, in fact any strong emotional excitement, will cause the secretion of adrenin from the adrenal glands. This in turn brings other bodily changes. Blood pressure is raised, and sugar increased in blood and urine. Saliva and gastric juices are no longer secreted. Contraction ceases in the muscles which move food through the stomach and intestines. The result is temporary or chronic indi- gestion, to which the name "emotional dyspepsia" has been given. At times, however, the secretion of adrenin under strong emotional excitement may have a physiologi- cal value. The increased blood supply, its diversion from certain areas, and its high energy content, make greater muscular activity possible. Heavy breathing gives room •Leo F. Rettger and Harry A. Cheplin, Transformation of the Intestinal Flora, 1921. THE CONTEOL OF HEALTH 113 for additional carbon dioxide in the blood. The adrenin relaxes the smooth muscles in the lungs, and in general acts as an antidote to fatigue. These values, which were vital in the struggles of primitive man, are utilized today in the exertion and excitement of athletic contests and other forms of active exercise.^ Medicine is now making use of this close connection between the mind, and the nervous system which regulates the activity of the body. Persons constantly make sug- gestions to themselves regarding their bodily condition. And these suggestions are being carried out, sometimes to a remarkable degree as in paralysis of the limbs or produc- tion of scars on the skin. In functional nervous troubles, the patient is not only liable to various mental delusions. Practically any organ or part of the body may be affected. The aim of the trained operator is to displace suggestions of sickness, and encourage suggestions of mental and physi- cal health. The conscious personality of an adult is pro- tected by a sort of armor, formed by the habits and fric- tions of daily experience. Beneath this are the subcon- scious depths to which reference was made in an earlier chapter. The problem is to pierce this armor and thus reach the undermind, with its immense possibilities for initiating new attitudes and controlling bodily changes. Sometimes this is done through a sudden shock. The undermind may be directly exposed, as in hypnotic sleep. Or casual conversation will give an entrance through in- direct suggestion. To reach that mysterious region be- neath the threshold of ordinary consciousness, is to hold at least one of the keys to health.^ The cures made in our psychiatric laboratories are paral- leled by Christian Science and by the Roman Catholic shrine at Lourdes. In these cases the same method of sug- gestion is followed, although blindly and without ade- *W. B. Cannon, Bodily Changes m Pain, Hunger, Fear a/nd Rage, 1915. •Percy Dearmer, Body and 8€ Impulse in Industry, 1918. ATTEMPTED EEMEDIES 207 task of any Socialist society must be to increase the pro- ductivity of labor. ... If the working class of this or any other country should take possession of the existing organization of production, there would not be enough in the fund now going to the capitalist class to satisfy the requirements of the workers, even if not a penny of com- pensation were paid to the expropriated owners." ^* What our study has indicated is the benefit that has tended to result to both employer and employee from the improvement in conditions of labor and the increase of re- ward, with a resulting rise in standard of living. One cannot read Miss Tarbell's book on New Ideals in Business, without a realizing sense that good treatment is good busi- ness. The ideal of a recognized common interest in the work of production has been eloquently expressed by King. "Let Faith be substituted for Fear; let mutual considera- tion and confidence supplant suspicion, and constructive good-will replace resistance; let the parties to Industry recognize a mutuality, not a conflict of interest, in all that pertains to maximum production and equitable distribu- tion of wealth ; and what is the result ? Immediately, fresh energies are released, a new freedom is given to effort in Industry. Productivity is increased, as are also the re- spective rewards of all the parties." ^^ The second fact suggested by our study helps to explain the present difficulty in realizing this ideal. It is appar- ent today, even more clearly than in the pre-War period, that good treatment of labor may bring bad results. This fact has mystified many employers. But it simply means that there are psychological factors, the neglect of which may vitiate the advantage of better working conditions and larger rewards. The parties to Industry are individual human beings, not machines. The employer is human. His unconscious hypocrisy, his patronizing paternalism, even his indigestion or domestic troubles, may affect the ** John Spargo, Bolshevism, 1919, 287. "W. L. M. King, Industry wnd Humanity^ 1918, 261. 208 CHAOS OE COSMOS? spirit of the entire plant. The foreman is human. A pig- headed or bad-tempered or domineering overseer has been known to undo the best-laid plans of the management. The workman is very human. He has his own moods and whims, his family or financial worries, his days of ner- vousness and low vitality. He is filled with the traditions and prejudices of his race, religion, class and trade. !N^o two workmen are alike. One likes to work under strict discipline, another resents authority. One man may en- joy a monotonous task, where his mate, apparently with no higher intelligence, is irritated by it. In different groups of workmen, we find the same infinite permutations of personality, complicated by racial mixtures and the character of the group leadership. The proper handling of industrial relations is indeed a fine art. 'No mechanical scheme can be counted on to give specific results. The most striking characteristic of the present-day workman, particularly in the semi-skilled trades, would seem to be his independence. The democratic spirit has gripped him. He is no longer satisfied with mere freedom of contract, or a cinch-hold on the rewards of production. The recent situation in Industry has been thus interpreted to me by an industrial relations manager, who had been able to gain the worker's point of view through several years of practical experience. Before the War, with the surplus of labor and the fluctuating demands of Industry, the dominant motive was fear. The workman was haunted by the dread of losing his job. He did what he was told to do, and speeded up his output, on pain of having his place taken by another man. A type of foreman was developed whose success was gauged by his ability to drive the men under him. During the War, with the curtailment of the labor supply and the demand of the ITation for in- creased production, employers appealed to their men for cooperation in the industry, on patriotic grounds. This appeal met a somewhat general response. A large num- ber of plants installed some plan of employees' represen- ATTEMPTED KEMEDIES 209 tation, of which I shall speak later. On the part of the employers, however, this idea was not deep-seated ; it was intended merely for a patriotic emergency. Most of them proceeded to forget it, and hoped that their employees would do the same. But the workmen did not forget. They felt that they had been promised certain things, and that these promises ought to be fulfilled. They had been given a taste of democratic management, and refused to go back to the old autocratic relations. With the con- tinued labor shortage, they had lost their fear ; they could no longer be driven. The result was seen in the general industrial unrest, and, more specifically, in lowered out- put, irregularity in reporting for work, and the tremen- dous increase in the labor turnover, the proportion of new men hired reaching in some plants as high as 1,000 per cent a year. How far this free and democratic spirit will evaporate under changed economic conditions, no one can predict. The fear of unemployment is again enforcing discipline and increasing output. But a man's experience of democ- racy is like a ratcheted wheel, which goes forward but can- no*- go backward. I am inclined to think that what Hen- derson wrote six years ago is even more true today. "The modern workman never can be morally content and satis- fied as long as his mind, will and voice count for nothing in the direction of the industry and its product. He may not yet be adequately prepared for that responsibility ; his am- bition may outrun his education, but he is looking forward to it, and he chafes while he waits." ^^ Our study has shown that the motive of acquisitiveness cannot be utilized beyond a certain point for the stimula- tion of output. There are other important instincts, how- ever, which modem Industry has tended to overlook or sup- press. Increasing specialization has left little scope for "Chas. R. Henderson, Citizens in Industry, 1915, xv. Cf. Report of President's Indust. Conf., 1920 ; Wm. R. Basset, When the Worker Helps You Manage, 1919; Meyer Bloomfield, Survey, 28, 312, 1912. 210 CHAOS OE COSMOS? the creative instinct, the craftsman's joy in the finished product. There seems to be no possibility of going back to the old system, where the worker in a shoe factory, for example, made a complete shoe. To secure a general re- vival of the spirit of craftsmanship, two lines are being followed. The first is educational. Much may be hoped for from the modem movement for vocational training, of which I have already spoken. The second line of ap- proach is the development of a worker's interest in the in- dustry through some measure of democratic control. We all find greater joy in work when we feel a sense of part- nership in the process, or ownership in the product. "The kitchen-maid may very easily find the dish washing a drudge's task, while the housewife does not so consider it. The difference lies in the interest of the worker in the household as a member of it." ^"^ The same psychological fact is likely to be true in Industry. Democratic control allows scope for the instinct of self-assertion, and for the herd instinct, which leads men to act together and follow the leadership they have themselves helped to create. Ex- periments along this line will occupy our attention in the next chapter. "Fred H. Colvin, Labor Turnover, Loyalty and Output, 1919, 25. See also Ordway Tead, Instincts in Industry, 1918, an invaluable book for the student of industrial relations. XIX. DEMOCRACY IN INDUSTRY. From the standpoint of Society as a whole, our elaborate industrial organization is not for the sake of profits or wages, but rather for the production of community goods and the development of complete men. A system which fell far short of the possibilities of production, or which dwarfed the many for the sake of the few, must be re- garded as a social failure. And social failure is cosmic maladjustment, a lack of harmony with the fundamental conditions of the Universe. There are therefore two gen- eral criteria for the success of an industrial policy: its ability to maintain the highest quantity and quality of pro- duction, or whatever public service is to be performed, and its physical and moral effect on the men engaged in it. The two are closely related. To obtain a high out- put from the worker, as we have seen, it is necessary to secure, not only proper working and housing conditions, but the free expression of those instincts which lead work- men to do their best work. These factors in turn aid the full development of personality. It is in his daily task that a man normally finds his life and maintains his self- respect.^ In this chapter I shall outline some of the experiments that have been made along the line of industrial democ- racy. They will indicate the results which may be ex- pected from the stimulation of other human motives, in addition to those involved in financial rewards.^ The fol- *See Whiting Williams, Whafs on the Workers' Mind, 1920, chap. 12. ^See ante p. 209. 211 212 CHAOS OR COSMOS? lowing examples are chosen to illustrate various types of cooperation. The Endicott-Johnson factories, near Binghamton, N. Y., the largest shoe manufacturers in the United States, have often been cited as an ideal of industrial relations. The owners grew up with the shoe and leather business, and Geo. F. Johnson, to whom the labor policy is largely due, started life as a shoemaker. About 13,000 workers were employed. In over 36 years there had been no sus- picion of labor trouble. Labor leaders who visited the plant made no attempt to organize the workers, stating that the company was doing for its help what the unions were trying to do. The workers were well paid. Every- thing possible was done for their comfort and enjoyment, and that of their families. They had absolute confidence in the management, which was constantly striving to un- derstand their point of view. There were no formal shop committees. Every employee knew that he could go di- rectly to the general manager, if he felt that injustice was being done. The employers and employees sent their chil- dren to the same schools, attended the same churches, and were interested in the same sports. The policy of the com- pany was to fill no important position outside of its own ranks, and the door of promotion was always open. The workers were encouraged to make suggestions for improve- ing the business ; one laborer was paid $5,000 in cash for a valuable idea. Profit sharing was introduced at the be- ginning of 1920, not as an incentive, but as a logical out- come of the mutuality of interest.^ It is obvious that such close personal relationships are impossible in the average corporation of the present day, whose managers have received their training in business rather than in the industrial process itself. I have given this example, partly for its historical interest, as illustrat- ing the survival in a large modern plant of the old time re- •The ideals of the owners are described in Red Cross Mag., Dec, 1919; System, Jan., 1920; Outlook, Apr. 14, 1920. DEMOCRACY IN INDUSTEY 213 lations of master and men ; partly because it suggests the spirit of fair dealing and sympathetic understanding which lies at the basis of successful labor management. Many corporations are requiring their future superintendents and staff officers to spend weeks or even months at the bench, in order to gain the point of view of the man with the dinner pail. Another ideal, showing what may be accomplished by arousing interest in productive processes, is found in the work of Kobert B. Wolf with the sulphite pulp plant of the Burgess Co., at Berlin, JST. H. In six years time, an annual output of 42,000 tons of the lowest quality was changed to 111,000 tons of the highest quality. "His first step was the working out of scientific standards for the tasks. To begin with, for example, there were nine men engaged in the important process of cooking the pulp. Each man cooked by his own rule-of -thumb method, and the result was nine different kinds of pulp, of varying de- grees of badness. There was on the staff of the plant a chemist, whose function was to make certain stereotyped tests. Mr. Wolf proceeded to make work interesting for the chemist by putting him at the job of improving the quality of the pulp. For a long time he studied the cook- ing process, and through the cooperation of the workmen who did the cooking he accumulated a large amount of technical data. At length, by the use of this data, and again with the help of the workmen, a combination of variables, temperature, pressure, cooking-time, etc., was worked out which produced good pulp. A chart was plot- ted which showed graphically the different factors in the ^deaF cooking process. The cookers readily grasped this chart, and they were then able to compare their own per- formance with the chart and gradually to make their ef- forts approximate the standard. . . . Progress records, either for individuals or groups, were worked out to affect almost every one of the twelve or thirteen hundred men in the mill. It is interesting to know that this scheme was 214 CHAOS OE COSMOS? first hit upon by accident Mr. Wolf planned a bonus sys- tem, and when this was turned down by the owners of the plant he conceived the idea of posting the records from which the bonuses would have been paid. As an improve- ment on purely quantity records quality records were evolved, and it was found that certain hard feelings engen- dered by quantity competition disappeared and that a spirit of intelligent cooperation among the men took its place. To improve their own work men made suggestions for improving operating conditions, which eventually re- sulted in the redesigning of most of the apparatus. Then one day a workman said, ^We don't know what things cost ; if we knew we could save materials.' The result was that cost sheets, which had first been given only to heads of departments, were given to each foreman and through him to the men. Foremen got into the habit of figuring estimates on the cost of their work, and then trying to beat their own estimates. Some of the workmen would bring scales into the mill to weigh the material delivered to them, to make sure the storehouse was not beating them on the material charged against the job. The net result was the cutting in two of the maintenance material cost, with a saving of $20,000 a month." In Mr. Wolf's words : "Our men were well paid, better paid than those in any similar plant in the country, because they earned it. But the pay- ment was entirely on a weekly and hourly basis." Men frequently said to him: "We don't like to be bribed to do a good job. We would like to have the privilege of doing a good job without being baited to do it." Similar plans carried out in a group of Canadian plants, had the hearty support of the union. John P. Burke, president of the International Brotherhood of Pulp, Sulphite and Paper Mill Workers, says: "Four years ago I worked in the mill. I know what it is to go through the same deaden- ing motions hour after hour and day after day. When that work was made interesting it was as much of a bene- fit to the workers as taking four hours off the workday. DEMOCRACY IN INDUSTRY 215 When Mr. Wolf explained to the local union what he pro- posed to do, and when we were satisfied that he had no ul- terior motives, we cooperated with him, hecause the labor movement believes in progress, not in stagnation." * The plan of industrial cooperation inaugurated by the Colorado Fuel and Iron Co., at the close of the strike de- scribed in a previous chapter, was a compromise between the system of individual bargaining previously in force, and recognition of the miners' union, which the company had persistently refused. John D. Kockefeller, Jr. made B. personal visit to Colorado, meeting the miners in their homes. He said to them : "They tell you that we are ene- mies. I have come here to tell you that we are not ene- mies, but partners. Labor and Capital are partners, not enemies. Neither one can get on without the other. Their interests are common, not antagonistic." The idea of Mr. King had been to devise some machinery which would not only prevent labor from being exploited, but secure the cordial cooperation which would further industrial effi- ciency. A system of representative government was worked out, with joint committees for each district, and for the industry as a whole. An Employees' Bill of Eights assured strict compliance with federal and state laws, the posting at each mine of the wage scale and work- ing conditions, the right of assemblage, and of membership or non-membership without discrimination in any union. Grievances were to be investigated. An appeal could be taken to the officers of the company, and from these to the State Commission, whose findings were to be regarded as binding on both parties. The plan was submitted to the men, and adopted by a majority of 84 per cent of the votes cast. It is interesting to note that the constitution was printed in seven languages.^ * Survey, 44, 112, Apr. 17, 1920. See also Wolf's paper on Non- Financial Incentives, Am. Soc. of Mechan. Engineers, Dec, 1918. °W. L. M. King, Industry and Humanity, 1918, 434 ff.; Commis. on Indust. ReVs, 1916, 9, 8449 //.; J. D. Rockefeller, Jr., The Colo- rado Indust. Plan, 1916. 216 CHAOS OR COSMOS? There can be no question that this plan was offered by the company in good faith, and represented a radical change in policy. Many of the worst evils were corrected. The mine foreman was shorn of some of his arbitrary power. Cooperation between the representatives of em- ployers and employees secured a great improvement in con- ditions of labor and housing. The men, however, appear to have resented it as an attempt to forestall their own democratic plan of representation through the union. They took little interest in the elections, and made almost no use of the machinery for presenting grievances.^ Those famil- iar with the situation were not surprised to learn of another strike in the Fall of 1921, following a 30 per cent reduction in wages. The statement of the company's counsel, on "Noy, 17, is highly significant, in the light of previous history: "We will let the mines remain idle if the men go out until such time as they are ready to report back for work. The Colorado Fuel and Iron Company, contrary to current re- ports, will not import one strike breaker. If any need arises for protection of our property we will look to the State to provide it. We will not employ one additional watchman and we refuse to admit there will be any need for mine guards." An associate of the C. F. and I. in the strike of 1913, the Victor American Fuel Co., was forced by labor condi- tions to reverse its attitude toward organized labor, and make a contract with the United Mine Workers. This Agreement will serve as well as any to illustrate the col- lective bargaining carried out for many years in a large section of American industry, by what Hoxie calls the "business type" of labor union. It covers 17 companies in Colorado, and 26 mines, for each of which the piece and times rates are minutely specified. "In the interest of good and efficient service," the contract reads, "the Union • John A. Fitch, Two Tears of the Rockefeller Plan, Survey, 39, 14, Oct. 6, 1917. See also comment by J. E. Williams, id., 35, 145, Nov. 6, 1915. DEMOCRACY IN INDUSTRY 217 agrees to promote and encourage a feeling of friendliness, cooperation and contentment at the mines of the Company in order that there shall be no violation of the contract; and to use all the power and influence of the Union, its ^National, District and Local Officers to see that not only the letter but the spirit of this contract shall be obeyed. Violations of the contract, such as have occurred in the past,*^ will not be tolerated, and those responsible for agi- tating violations or other trouble will be punished accord- ing to the provisions of the laws of the Union, the intention being that the mines of the Company may operate prosper- ously and without interruption at the highest possible pro- duction with competent industrious workmen." Simple machinery is provided for the adjustment of grievances, the base of the system being the Pit Committee and the Mine Foreman, and the apex an umpire selected by the Presidents of the company and of the United Mine Work- ers, whose decision is final. No strikes are allowed for any reason, members violating this rule having $2.00 per day deducted from their earnings. The company is to be fined for a lockout, at the rate of $2.00 per day for each employee affected. Any employee who absents himself from duty for two days or more, or who persists in work- ing irregularly, forfeits his position. The company is to compensate any miner unjustly discharged. Other sec- tions provide full regulations to cover such matters as tim- bering, docking, checkweighman, etc. The union dues are to be collected by the company, as a deduction from the pay roll. This standardizing of industrial relations is possible only with a strong and national Trade Union. Many em- ployers prefer to negotiate with a union agent rather than with their own men, as he has a knowledge of the industry as a whole and is free from local bias. The plan of Shop Committees or Works Councils, was given great impetus by the War Labor Board. Up to the ' This refers to the previous Agreement, renewed for two yean on April 1, 1920. 218 CHAOS OE COSMOS? middle of 1919, over 200 plants, with 500,000 workers, were known to have installed some form of employees' rep- resentation.^ These ranged from mere discussion clubs, up to the representative government of the Filene store in Boston, or the Procter and Gamble Co., with the employees participating as stockholders and represented on the Board of Directors. The success of the movement has been equally various. Where honestly and carefully installed, with the approval of the workers themselves, the plan has tended to bring mutual understanding and harmony. It cannot safely be used as a substitute for the labor union, if the men strongly desire a union. In many cases re- markable results have been achieved, often in connection with some form of profit-sharing. I select an example which has been in operation for a decade. In 1910, the Philadelphia Kapid Transit Co. was on the verge of collapse. "No dividends had been paid for eight years. Equipment was in shocking condition, and service demoralized. Two recent strikes, resulting in rioting and bloodshed, had cost the company and the city millions of dollars, while the* men had lost more than half a million in wages alone. Another strike was brewing. E. T. Stotes- bury was persuaded to assume the direction of the com- pany, as a civic duty, and money found for the purchase of modem cars. The new management took hold with the understanding that in five years' time it would provide the public with an adequate system of transportation, and the men with such increased wages and improved working conditions as cooperation might make possible: stock- holders must wait for returns until these two questions had been disposed of. The plan of industrial relations was worked out by Thomas E. Mitten, chairman of the execu- tive committee, on the basis of his previous experience in 'Nat. Indust. Conf. Board, Works Councils in the U. 8., 1919; New Jersey Bureau of State Research, Shop Committees and Indust. Councils, 1919; Wm. L. Stoddard, The Shop Com., 1919; John Leitch, Man to Man, 1919; Ordway Tead and Henry C. Metcalf, Personnel Administration, 1920. DEMOCRACY IN INDUSTEY 219 Chicago. Finding that about 22% of the gross passenger receipts were being used in the payment of wages and sick benefits, Mr. Mitten had this percentage set aside as a fund from which the men would receive their compensation. Any increase in receipts, due to larger cars and improved routing, or to greater promptness, honesty or courtesy on the part of the employees, would mean larger wages to the men. The actual disposition of this fund was put in the hands of the cooperative committee, made up of two motor- men or conductors elected by secret ballot in each of the car bams, or divisions. These two representatives ar- ranged the runs made from the barn, acted as a grievance committee for the men, and cooperated with the company in the matter of discipline. Once a month the committee met as a whole, the company being represented (without vote) by the division superintendents. Among the matters taken up were new routings and time-tables proposed by the company, the more important cases of grievance, the management of the cooperative benefit and purchasing plans operated by the men, and the wage scale which would be justified by the condition of the 22% fund. In carry- ing out the plan the company dealt with the men as indir viduals, divisions among the employees making it impos^ sible for Mr. Mitten to deal directly with the union as he had done in Chicago. The understanding was that the latter plan would be followed whenever two-thirds of the men so voted. Two strikes were attempted, but caused no serious inter- ruption to service. The second, in 1918, was investigated by the War Labor Board, which dismissed the complaint. On the advice of this body, the 22% wage fund was abol- ished, in order to bring wages up to the current scale. Other modifications were made at this time. The cooper- ative plan was extended to all departments of the company, joint committees taking the place of the former commit- tees of employees. In cases of controversy, representatives of employer and 'employees were to vote separately, by 220 CHAOS OR COSMOS? secret ballot. Final settlement was vested in a Board of Arbitration. The results of the Stotesbury-Mitten plan were very re- markable. In the first three years, resignations were re- duced from 1,390 to 337, and dismissals from 1 in 6 to 1 in 20. The average wage of conductors and motormen was increased from 23 cents an hour in 1911 to 31 cents in 1916, 43 cents in July, 1918, and 58 cents in 1919. The gross earnings of the company increased 89%. The rate of fare for the public had not been raised. The average rides per capita in Philadelphia increased from 288 in 1910 to over 425 in 1919. In other words, an increase in wages of 150% had been matched by 120% increase in production. The number of accidents was cut in half. The employees developed into what Mr. Mitten has called "the most courteous, careful, and efficient body of motor- men and conductors in America." Of a force of about 10,000, over 99% were members of the Cooperative Wel- fare Association, which furnished a blanket life insurance policy of $1,000 at a cost of $1.00 per month, in addition to sick benefits and pensions.^ In the Government Arsenals, the signing of the Armis- tice threatened a serious reduction of business and em- ployment. Permission was given by the Secretary of War for the arsenals to bid on the peace-time require- ments of the government departments, in competition with private concerns. The shop committees which had been already introduced, with the backing of the unions, began to take on new and interesting functions. When a proposal for a bid is received by an arsenal, "the employees' com- mitteemen become immediately active. First, it is decided by the central committee whether its arsenal can manufac- ture the article upon which bids are sought. Manifestly it is to the employee's interest to get the work for his particu- lar arsenal, since the tenure of his employment depends *Commi88. on Indust. ReVs, 1916, 3, 2733 ^; The Cooperative Plan of the P. R. T., 1918; Year Booh, 1919. DEMOCRACY IN INDUSTRY 221 upon securing enough work to prevent further reduction in the arsenal force. The tendency of the commanding officer of the arsenal is naturally and properly toward con- servatism ; if the proposal is for work rather aside from the usual lines of manufacture in his arsenal, he inclines to play safe ; that is, either not to bid, or to bid fairly high to avoid loss. The employees incline to bid low to get the work done and hold their jobs. The result actually reached is that the employees investigate with great care the possi- bilities of economic manufacture of the particular article being considered. The best men on each process which will be involved if the contract is secured are consulted, and, in effect, the combined experience and resourceful- ness of the employees is massed on the problem. Re- peatedly the estimates of the employees on labor costs have been so low as to give pause to the commanding officer and the planning department, which advises him. The em- ployees then are put in the position of definite responsi- bility for their own estimates of the performance which they can deliver. They virtually guarantee the estimates as to direct labor costs — in fact, in at least one instance the employees were required by the ordinance officer in charge of the shop to guarantee in writing to meet an estimate which they had made and which he believed to be too low. Not an instance has occurred thus far in which the employees have not held labor cost below their estimate." With the change in function of the workers' organization, has come a change in the character of the union leadership, good fighters giving place to men with ability as produc- tive workmen. ^^ In September, 1910, a Protocol or treaty of peace was signed in the Ladies' Garment Industry in New York City, after many years of warfare and a general strike of unusual bitterness. The contracting parties were the Cloak, Suit and Skirt Manufacturers' Protective Associ- ation, and certain locals of the International Ladies' Gar- " Industrial Democ. at Rock Island, Nation, Sept. 13, 1919. 222 CHAOS OE COSMOS? ment Workers' Union. As the union had insisted on a closed shop and the employers on an open shop, Mr. Bran- deis' suggestion of a preferential shop was made the basis of compromise. Under this arrangement, "the employer is bound to maintain union standards as to hours, etc., and to give the preference in employing and retaining help to union members. On their side the unions are bound to maintain discipline in the shop among their members, to restrain them from breaches of contract and unauthorized strikes, and to see that they live up to the conditions of the Protocol; in other words, in return for the preference shown them, the unions assume full responsibility for the conduct of their members." ^^ Subcontracting within the shop and the taking of work home were forbidden, thus doing away with the sweatshop and the tenement worker. Minor abuses in shop practice were corrected, a minimum wage-scale established, and a 50-hour week. Strikes and lockouts were prohibited during the life of the treaty, for which there was no time limit. Three joint bodies were set up by the Protocol. The Board of Sanitary Control was to establish standards for the industry. Because of the character of its personnel, and the efficiency of the director. Dr. Geo. M. Price, its work was remarkably efficient. A systematic inspection of the 1,243 shops in 'New York City, showed that about two- thirds were defective either in sanitation, fire protection, or both. At the end of six months, only 54 of these re- mained unimproved. Under the terms of the agreement, no member of the union would work in a shop declared unsanitary, and no manufacturer would give out work for this shop to do. The erring employer either complied with the recommendations of the Board, or was forced out of business. Twenty-seven such "sanitary strikes" occurred within the first year. Thus both the worker and the em- " Chas. H. Winslow, Bur. of Labor Statistics, Bull 98, 1912, 203. See also Bull's 144 and 145, 1914; Monthly Review, Dec, 1917, 19; Julius H. Cohen, Law and Order in Industry, 1916. DEMOCRACY IN INDUSTRY 223 ployer were protected against the cut-throat competition of unscnipulous firms. The Board of Arbitration, made up of such distin- guished names as Louis D. Brandeis, Hamilton Holt and Morris Hillquit, acted as a court of appeal, chiefly confin- ing itself, however, to differences which arose between the manufacturers' association and the union. The Board of Grievances, consisting of five members from each side, served as a trade court. Of the 1,004 cases adjusted in the first year, Y98 were settled by the deputy clerks, act- ing as a joint mediation committee, 202 by the Board it- self, and 4 appealed to the Board of Arbitration. The weakness of the system, as events proved, lay in the bi-partisan character of the trade court, and the lack of any body of law on which to base its decisions. The ma- chinery broke down after five years, ostensibly on the issue of the employer's right to discharge competent union work- men, but actually because of impatience on both sides with the moderate progress made in raising business standards and conditions. The attempt to introduce a constitution into the industry was not lost. Collective bargaining continued in the Cloak and Suit trade, under various forms of agreement. The Protocol idea had been adopted by other branches of the Ladies' Garment industry, in most of which it is still in force. Robert W. Bruere, who acted on the Board of Arbitration in the Waist and Dress group, has given inter- esting testimony as to the effect of industrial parliaments. Discussion, and adjustment on the basis of evidence, was substituted for strikes and lockouts, which until a few years ago kept the largest of our clothing industries in a state of perpetual turmoil. "I have seen employers and workers come together in the meetings of wage boards, tense with bitterness and hostility. I have heard them wrangle for hours over charges of bad faith and have seen them grow calm and reasonable as the questioning of the chairman brought out the facts on both sides and de- 324 CHAOS OE COSMOS? veloped the basis for an understanding. Often both sides will show an unexpected readiness to subordinate what they had considered their absolute rights in the premises to the larger interests of the industry, and to recognize themselves and one another, not so much as enemies fight- ing for a stake, but as industrial citizens with a common interest in the prosperity of the trade and a common re- sponsibility to the public." ^^ A parallel movement took place in the Men's Garment trade. It began with the Hart, Schaffner and Marx agree- ment, which has had a continuous life since February, 1911, with modifications and improvements, but without any serious break. The plan has since been adopted by other shops, and by clothing centers outside of Chicago.^* This firm, which employs about 6,500 workers, is now governed by the principle of the preferential union shop, a large proportion of the employees being members of the union. Each floor of their factories, containing from 100 to 200 workers, has a shop chairman, elected by the union members. He is recognized as an officer of the union, in charge of complaints and organization matters within the shop. Complaints are first taken up by the shop chairman with the foreman or superintendent. If no satisfaction ia obtained, the case is reported to the union, which employs four deputies, or business agents, one for each trade (coats, vests, trousers and cutting.) The proper deputy, after making an investigation, takes up the matter with the firm's labor manager, a university professor trained in Economics and given very broad powers. He is in charge of Health and Safety, Education, Employment, Disci- pline, and Wages and Eate Setting. He acts as the diplo- matic agent of the firm in all matters involving the labor force. Rates for piece work are set by a committee of ^Mecmitiff of the Minimum Wage, Harpers Mag., 132, 282, Jan., 1916. "Bur. of Labor Statistics, Bull. 198, 1916; New Jersey Bur. of State Research, Shop Corn's and Jndttst. Counoils, July, 1&19, pp. 28, 34, 52. DEMOCEACY IN INDUSTRY 225 three, one representing each side and a third member whom they select. Cases where the piece-rate committee, or the deputy and labor manager, fail to agree, are carried to the Trade Board of the Chicago clothing industry. This Board consists of an impartial chairman, and of ^ve repre- sentatives of each side, who practically argue the case be- fore him. The impartial chairman, paid jointly by the manufacturers and the union, is a man of the highest char- acter, chosen for his business acumen and diplomatic skill. The firm's records as to costs, profits, etc., are placed at his disposal, and his decisions are usually final. A Board of Arbitration is added, for questions involving the inter- pretation of the agreement. Back of the entire plan, on paper and in practice, is the idea of cooperation in pro- duction, and a community of interest. By the middle of 1919, this form of collective bargain- ing had come to include practically the entire industry. A national agreement between the manufacturers' associa- tion and the Amalgamated Clothing Workers was in pros- pect. Makers of high-grade clothing found the stabiliz- ing of labor and improvement of working conditions a great advantage. But the small amount of capital required in the business, the growth of subcontracting, and the sup- ply of immigrant workers available in normal times, make it diflScult for either the employers or the union to control the smaller shops. Conditions in the N"ew York market have been particularly chaotic. The unions in the needle trades, which we have been describing, are organized on industrial rather than craft lines. They are extremely democratic, and characterized by Socialism of a radical but idealistic type. They form, as has been said, "a spiritual brotherhood, based upon a common aspiration." ^* Their attitude towards the cloth- ing industry is that of future proprietors, rather than mere hired men. Efficiency methods, for example, at which the old unionist looks askance, are cordially accepted. *• J. M. Budish and Gl€o. Soule, The New Unionism, 1920, 157. 226 CHAOS OE COSMOS? Their remarkable educational program aims at a broad cul- ture and tbe mental emancipation of the working class, so that they may be made ready to assume control of pro- duction. As one observer has said : "The chief struggle of the far-sighted leadership among the Amalgamated Cloth- ing Workers is to keep in line the impatient extremists who are not satisfied with steady growth, but want the mil- lennium by tomorrow afternoon." ^^ What interests us here is the view of the new unionism that industry, even in its present stage, is a form of community service. The con- vention of 1920 put itself in line with the old-time crafts- men by declaring for definite standards of production, in connection with the policy of payment by the week rather than by the piece. In the course of the debate, Pres. Sid- ney Hillman, who might be termed the father both of the Hart, Schaffner and Marx agreement and of the Amalga- mated Clothing Workers, said: "For myself, I do not think that our union can adopt the ordinary rule of com- merce, the principle of the business man, which is to give as little as possible and to take as much as possible. We must have a different attitude toward the industry. We must accept responsibility for production. We cannot have sabotage by withholding production : we cannot have loafing; we must have production and we must recognize our responsibility." ^* In the agreement drawn up be- tween four silk ribbon manufacturers in !N"ew York, and weavers affiliated with the new Amalgamated Textile Workers, which grew out of the second Lawrence strike, we find this statement : "Public interest requires increas- ing production as a prime factor in reducing commodity prices. Wages, hours and working conditions should be regulated by this requirement." ^"^ All of these plans for cooperation in American industry are confessedly experimental. Most of them have yet to "Baker, New Industrial Urvresf, 1920, 197. " Swrvey, 44, 275, May 22, 1920. "/ tice, 154; honesty, 155; attain- ment of character, 160-164; problem of harmful forces, 165; standards of national re- lations, 248, 327; cosmic basis, xxi, 314; goal of personality, 317; change from individual to social standards, 326 Ettor, J. J., 185-186 Eugenics, heredity, 69-73; envi- ronment, 72-76, 320 Evans, M. S., 253 Evans, W. A., 121 Evil, in Nature, 165; in Society, 294, 3^0-321 352 IOT)EX Evolntion, 52-60, 312; versus aehievement, xxi, 316, 320; stages, 344-347 Fairehild, H. P., 284 Farman, E. E., 273 Fatigue, 92-93, 201-202 Finite or infinite Universe, 45- 46 Fire protection, forests, 116-117; buildings, 117-119 Fisher and Fisk, 106 Fitch, J. A., 181, 186, 216 Flexner, A., 127 Flexner, S., 295 Folks, H., 296 Force, in Physics, 26 Ford, Henry, 201 Foreign Missions, in Nigeria, 163-164; in Natal, 279 Forest fires, 116-117 Fosdick, H. E., 170 Foster, J. W., 267 France, 119, 139, 237; suspicion of Germany, 239; commercial reaction, 246-247 ; colonies, 257, 260-262; in Moroeeo, 265; tariff war with Switzerland, 300 Francke, K., 234 Frank, Leo, 285 Frankel and Fleisher, 203 Fraternal organizations, 136 Freedom and determinism, xix, 94 Freeman, F. N., 73 French Eevolution, 235, 271 Friday, D., 239 Friedman, E. M., 248, 298, 300 Future, Jewish view of, 4-5; of the earth, 318; of individual, 318-319; of the race, 323-328 Gantt, H. L., 201, 206, 326 Gary, Judge, 147 Geology, 44, 57, 339 Georgia Experiment Station, 97 Germany, 125; cult of Natural Selection, 232 ; population, 233-234; theory of State, 234- 235; colonies, 240, 257, 262- 263 ; commercial penetration, 240; cost of military competi- tion, 242-243; expansion of industry, 243-244; economic na- tionalism, 235, 244-246, 248; inflation, 246-247; internal sit- uation, 246, 248; in Turkey, 264; Morocco, 265; Persia, 265; Shantung, 271; Slesvig, 271; effect of War, 299 Gibbons, H. A., 263, 266-267 Gilbreth, F. B. and L. M., 93 Girault, A., 260-261 Gleason, A., 178 Globular clusters, 45, 337 Goldmark, J., 93 Goodwill, as business asset, 147- 150, 262; industrial asset, 227, 314-315 Gordon, K., 77 Gorgas, W. C, 121, 126 Gorilla, 72 Gourvitch, P. P., 244 Grant, L., 189 Gregory, W. K., 59 Grimke, A. H., 283 Groat, G. G., 178 Guatemala, 126, 295 Guayaquil, 126 Gulick, S. L., 267 Hadley, A. T., 151 Hagerty, J. E., 158-159 Hague Conferences, 306-307 Hale, E. E., 146 Hale, G. E., 44 Hall, W. E., 306 Hamburg, Ark., 125 Hamburg, Germany, 123 Hamilton-Beach Mfg. Co., 191 Hammond, L. H., 282 Hart, Schaffner and Marx, 224- 226 Harwood, W. S., 101 Hastings, E. G., 98 Hauser, H., 241, 245 Hays, W. M., 99 Health, 105-115, 119-126; inter- national, 294-296 Hebrew literature, mystical ele- ment, 4, 40 Henderson, C. B., 196, 209 Henderson, L. J., 55 Henley, W. E., 66 Heredity, 69-73 Herero revolt, 257 Herf ord, E. T., 4 Hershey, A. S., 306 Higgins, A. P., 306 s INDEX 353 HiU, D. S., 206 Hill, H. W., 123 Hillman, S., 226 Hirn, Y., 84 Hollman, G., 5 Holt, E. B., 162 Home, as center of altruism, 134- 135 Honesty, 155; basis of credit, 157 Honey production, 99 Hookworm, 295 Hopkins, E. G., 343 Horse, changes in dentition, 58 Howard, E. D., 244 Howard, E., 106 Howe, Julia Ward, 81-83, 86 Hoxie, E. F., 178, 202 Huckel, O., 115 Hunter, E., 193 Huntington, E., 343 Hyndman, H. M., 263 Immortality, 318-319 Indentured labor, 255-256 India, 262-263 Individual, in Jesus ' teaching, 9 j relation to the Universe, 65- 66, 77, 89, 102, 317; in in- dustry, 207, 211, 228, 317, 325, 327 Industrial education, 205-206 Industrial Eelations Commission, 181, 183, 186, 192, 196 Industrial Workers of tke World, 183, 185-186 Industry, social aspects, 75, 90- 93, 154-155, 211, 317; modern development, 176, 178; strug- gle for advantage, 177; re- sults of exploitation, 178-194; effect of better working condi- tions, 195; welfare work, 196; profit sharing, 197; compulsory arbitration, 198 ; government regulation, 199; bonus, 200- 202 ; employment methods, 203 ; training departments, 204-206; experiments in co- operation, 211-226; peace and war, 238-239; as form of mu- tual service, 326-327 Infantile paralysis, 295 Infant mortality, 124, 184 Influenza, 295 Ingersoll, B. G., 104 Inglis, A., 73 Inspiration, 81 Instincts, expression and repres- sion, 75; altruistic, 141-142; discipline of, 154, 162 ; acquisi- tiveness, 200-202 ; construc- tion and self-assertion, 209, 211; as motives of action, 228- 229, 315 Insurance, 118-119; social, 203, 327; against war, 307-308 Intelligence, 70-71, 74 International associations, 294, 296-297, 301 International Bridge and Struc- tural Ironworkers, 187-188 International Labor Legislation, Association for, 303; in Peace Treaty, 304; Conference, 304- 305 International Ladies ' Garment Workers, 221-223 International Law, 306 International Maritime Commit- tee, 302 International Metal Workers, 303 Intuition, 81 Iowa Experiment Sta., 96-97 Ireland, A., 252 Island universes, 45 Italy, 139, 241; adventure in Tripoli, 257 Jacoby, H., 44 Jamaica, 255, 284 Japan, results of war with Bus- sia, 237; treatment of China, 267-269; rise in wages, 303 Jastrow, J., 77 Jeans, J. H,, 44, 384 Jeffreys, H., 339 Jennings, H. S., 341, 346 Jephson, H., 122 Jesus, modernness, 1; a construc- tive thinker, xvi, 2, 311-312; sources for his teaching, 2; teaching in detail, 3-15; ideas of astronomy, 43 ; on marriage, 68; use of term love, 134, 149; broadening of group al- truism, 143; consideration as self-interest, 148; system of 354 INDEX ethics, 153, 162, 167; idea of prayer, 167-171 Johnson, F. E., 186 Jones, D. F., 71, 101 Jordan, E. O., 106 Justice, 154-156 J for Negroes, 284-286, 289 Kaffirs, 278-281 Kapteyn, J. C, 46, 340 Keller, A. G., 252 Kellogg, v., 128 Kelly, E. W., 203, 205 Kerlin, E. T., 287 Kidd, B., 148, 252 King, W. L. M., 181, 207, 215 Kingdom of God, in Jesus' teaching, 6-7, 9; not a Utopia, 149, 320; a cooperative enter- prise, 316 Knopf, S. A., 125 Krehbiel, E., 307 Ku Klux Klan, 284, 287 Labor, moral value, 91; condi- tions of efficiency, 92-93; un- ions as centers of altruism, 136- 138; history and status, 176- 178; coal mining, 178-181; lumbering, 181-183 ; textile mills, 183-186 ; controversy with National Erectors' Asso- ciation, 187-188; N. Y. Build- ing Trades Council, 189-190; objection to welfare work, 197 ; to profit sharing, 198; to com- pulsory arbitration, 198; to piece work, 201; to Scientific Management, 201-202; unem- ployment, 203; human factor, 207, 327; effect of war condi- tions, 208; attempts to revive craftsmanship, 210-220; needle trades, 221-226; assuming re- sponsibility for production, 226, 327; in tropics, 254-257; international, 302-305, 309 Labor cost, and standard of liv- ing, 200, 303 Labor turnover, 203, 205, 209 Ladies* Garment industry, 2£1- 223 Lane, C. B., 97 Laski, H. J., 151 Lauck, W. J., 186 Laughlin, J. L., 158, 247 Law, 155, 325; international, 306 Lawrence, Mass., 183-186 Lawrence, T. J., 306 Leacock, S., 178 League of Nations, 258, 296, 302, 304, 307-308 Leake, A. H., 206 Lebedew, P., 46 Le Bosquet, J. E., 151 Lecky, W. E. H., 150-151 Le Dantec, F., 50, 149-150 Leduc, S., 50 Lee, F. S., 93 Leitch, J., 218 Life, 26; theories of origin, 49- 50; physico-chemical basis, 55, 342-343 Lippmann, W., 151, 250-252 List, F., 234 Livingstone, W. P., 164, 255 Loeb, J., 66 Loeb, L., 342 London, sanitary evolution, 122 Lorentz, H. A., 21-22 Lull, E. a, 44, 50, 56, 58, 339 Lumber industry, 182-183, 195 Lusk, G., 106 Lynching, 284-285 Madagascar, 260-261 Maize, 100 Malaria, 125, 323 Malthus, 232-233 Man, evolution, 59, 141; heredi- ty, 69-73; environment, 72-76; mental adjustment, vii-viii, 77' 79; physical adjustment, 88- 90; developing food supply, 95- 103; control of health, 105- 115; of providence, 116-129; moral adjustment, 42, 144, 164 167, 171, 173, 175, 228-229, 248, 294, 309, 311, 314-315, 322-323 ; as partner in creation, 313-314; as object of creative process, 317; future social de- velopment, 318; future of in- dividual, 318-319; slow social adjustment, 320-321; marks of progress: lengthening of hu- man life, 323-324; democratic movement, 325; social solid- arity, 326-328 Mandatories, 258 im>EX 355 Marot, H., 206 Mars, 48 Marshall's Microbiology, 98, 102, 106, 123 Materialism, vii, 20-23, 28, 312 Mathews, A. P., 106 Matter, electrical theory of, 20- 23 J theological problem, 29, 31, 312 Mauritius, 256, 262 Mayo, W. J., 120-121 McDougall, W., 69, 297 McManigal, O., 188 McNamaras, 188 McPherson, J. B., 186 Meat-packing combination, 148 Medicine, surgery, 106-107; chemistry, 108-109; bacteriol- ogy, 109-111; mental hygiene, 112-115; prevention of disease, 120-126 Mendel 's Law, 53 Men's Garment industry, 137, 202, 224-225 Mental hygiene, 106, 112-115 Metchnikoff, 111 Migration, Negro, 288-289, 292 Miles, H. E., 205 Milk, 96-98, 123 Milky Way, 44-45, 337-338 Millikan, R. A., 20 Millioud, M., 245-247 Milner, A., 272-273 Minchin, E. A., 50 Minimum wage, 199 Minkow^ski, 24 Minnesota Experiment Sta., 99- 100 Mitten, T. E., 218-220 Monism and Pluralism, xix, 65, 77, 94, 105, 313 Montefiori, C. G., 4 Moore, B., 50 Morgan, T, H., 26, 52, 66, 234, 342 Morman, J. B., 159 Morocco, 251, 265, 295, 307 Morris Plan banks, 158 Morris, Wm., 91 Morse, J., 287 Mote, C. H., 199 Moulton, F. R., 44 Mt. Wilson observatory, 337 Mozart, 85-86 Miinsterberg, H., 77, 106 Murphy, E. G., 286-287 Music, 84 Mutations, 52-55, 70, 234, 341- 343 Mysticism, 32-33, 41-42 Natal, effect of British rule, 278-279; treatment of natives, 279-281 National Erectors* Association, 187-188 National Industrial Conference Board, 199, 218 Nationalism, economic, 235, 244, 248; racial, 270-271, 281, 287, 328; political, 263, 272-274 National relations, contrasting theories, 232, 248-249, 294 Natives, treatment of, 252-257; in Natal, 279-281 Natural Selection, 52-54, 232-234 Nature, Jesus' view of, xvii, 3- 4; man's communion with, 35- 38; symbolism, 39-40; mysti- cism, 41-42; uniformity of, 51, 87-88 ; cooperation with, 66, 88- 90; contact with, in manual labor, 91; in agriculture, 103 Nearing, S., 178 Negro, 93; in tropics, 254-257; in Southern states, 282-283; sex relations, 283; lynching, 284-285; civil jusftice, 286; effect on whites, 286, 293; ra- cial tension, 287; migration, 288-289; education, 290-291; agriculture, 291; public health, 291; purchasing power, 292; and organized labor, 292 Neill, C. P., 186 Netherlands, 37; colonial policy, 258, 278; in Java, 274-278 Neurones, 72, 80 New Jersey Bureau of State Re- search, 218, 224 New York City, 118-119, 137, 194, 221-223, 225 New Zealand, 199n, 270 Olivier, S., 254-257, 285 Olsen, J. C, 123 Open door, 261-263 Oppenheim, L., 306 Osborn, H. F., 50, 56-57, 59, 345-347 Osier, W., 106 356 INDEX Packard Motor Co., 204 Paleontology, 58, 346 Palgrave, F. T., 36 Panama Canal, reduction of death rate, 121 Pan-Germans, 235-236, 240, 248 Panspermism, 47, 49 Parables, Jesus' use of, 2 Parker, C. H., 75, 183 Parmelee, M., 69 Patriotism, as altruistic, 139-140 Patten, S. N., 324 Paul, 68, 134, 298 Pearl, E., 119-120 Pearson, K., 71 Persia, 251, 265, 295 Perugino, 41 Peters, J. G., 117 Pfluger, E., 50 Pharisaism, 4-5 Philadelphia Eapid Transit Co., 218-220 Philanthropy, 151, 325 Philippines, TT. S. in, 257 Physics, electrical theory of Mat- ter, 20-22; relativity, 23-25 relation to Biology, 26, 55 uniformity of Nature, 87-88 cooperation with Nature, 90 Piez, C, 192 Pigou, A. C, 203 Pillsbury, W. B., 77 Pirrson and Schuehert, 44 Planetesimal hypothesis, 339 Planets, habitable, 47-49, 339-340 Plants, evolution, 56, 345 j breed- ing, 53-54, 99-101, 341 Poetry, landscape in, 35-36, 40 Popenoe and Johnson, 69 Population, theory of, 232-234; emigration, 251, 300-301; Java, 276-277; Natal, 278 Porteus, S. D., 71 Pragmatism, viii, 149, 236, 323 Pratt, J. B., 163 Prayer, in Jesus* teaching, 11; cooperative basis, 167-172; answer to, 170; social value, 171-172 Prendergast, W. A., 158 President 's Industrial Commis- sion, 199, 209, 226 Preziosi, G., 240-241 Price, G. M., 196, 222 Primates, 57, 59 Profiteering, 229 Profit sharing, 197-198, 212 Prostitution, 69; control, 127 Protocol, 221-223 Protozoa, 56, 345 Providence, in Jesus* teaching, 10-11; man's control of, 116; fire, 116-119; health, 119-121; accident, 121; sanitation, 122- 125; disease, 125-126; prosti- tution, 127; alcoholism, 127; famine, 128; meaning of con- trol, 133, 168, 324 Psychology, 77; concepts, vii, 77-79; mind and brain, 26, 80; the subconscious, 80-83, 86; aesthetics, 84-85 Public health, 120-126; in South, 282-283, 291; as international problem, 294-296 Punett, E. C, 52 Putnam-Weale, B. L., 269 Eace, 70, 263, 270, 282, 328 Eankin, M. T., 199 Eausehenbusch, W., 28 Eeclamation and drainage, 102 Eed Cross, work in Europe, 128; in American communities, 139; international, 296 Eedfield, W. C, 200-201 Eeichert, E. T., 342 Eeinsch, P. S., 252, 261, 294 Eelativity, 21, 23-25 Eeligion, viii, xvii; and Sci- ence, 27-32; dualism, 29-30; biological significance, 30; re- lation to sex, 68; to labor, 90- 92; to agriculture, 103; to health, 113-115; to character building, 161-164; as interna- tional force, 297; place of Christianity, 311; pragmatic value, 322-323; change of tone, 323-324 Eenaissance, 36 Eetail trade, modern evolution, 146-147 Eettger, L. F., 112 Eevolutionary propaganda, 183, 185-186, 194, 325 Eichardson, O. W., 21 Eitter, W. E., 66 Eobinson, W. J., 69 Eochester, N. Y., 123 INDEX 357 Rockefeller Poundation, 125-126, 296 Rockefeller, J. D., Jr., 181, 215 Roe, J. W., 159 Romanticism, 37 Rosenau, M. J., 106, 123 Rotary Club, code of ethics, 156 Romnania, 139 Rowntree, B. S., 178, 203 Rubinow, I. M., 203 Rucker, W. J., 195 Russell, H. N., 336, 338 Russia, 139, 194, 293, 325; war with Japan, 237; in Persia, 265 Ryan, F. M., 187-188 Safety engineering, 121, 203 St. Thomas, 255 Sanders, A., 96 Sanitary Control, Board of, 222 Sanitation, 122-126, 283 Sayre, F. B., 294 Schafer, E. A., 50 Schechter, S., 4 Schuchert, C, 44, 58 Science, inductive method, vii, 1, 32, 175, 227; and Religion, 27-32, 322-323 Scientific Management, 201-203 Scott, E. J., 289 Sedgwick, W. T., 123 Seligman, H. J., 287, 292 Senancour, E. P. de, 42 See, T. J. J., 43-44, 47 Serbia, 139, 305 Sex, 67-68; relations in South, 283-284 Shadwell, A., 244 Shantung, 267-268 Shapley, H., 44-46, 336, 338 Sherrington, C. S., 77 Shop committees, 217-220 Sidis, B., 77 Slessor, M., 163 Slesvig, 271 Slichter, S. H., 203 Small, A. W., 80 Smallpox, 125-126 Smith, Adam, 176, 235 Smith, G. E., 59 Smith, R. H., 155 Social insurance, 203, 327 Socialism, materialism, 28; and production, 206 j in needle trades, 225; German, 235; in- ternational, 303 Society, not an organism, xviii, 316; solidarity of, 11-12, 316- 317, 326; as viewpoint, 152, 309, 325 Soil improvement, 101-102 Solano, E. J., 305 Sommerville, D. M. Y., 25 South Africa, 256, 270; treat- ment of natives, 255, 278-281 Spargo, J., 207 Species, origin of, 52-55, 341- 343 Speech, 72, 78 Spencer, Herbert, 82-83, 86 Sport, 91; international, 297 Starbuck, E. D., 163 State, German theory of, 234- 235; economic nationalism, 236, 244, 248 Stoddard, L., 256, 263 Stoddard, W. L., 218 Stotesbury-Mitten plan, 218-220 Subconscious, 77, 80-82; training of, 83 Suggestive therapeutics, 106, 112- 115 Superman, 70, 317 Surgery, 106 Switzerland, 241, 300 Tarbell, I. M., 196, 207 Tariff, protective, 236, 244-246, 248; preferential, 236, 252, 259-261, 263, 270; anti-dump- ing, 246; wars, 300; bargain- ing, 300 Taxes, German, 242-243 ; for colo- nization, 257; of colonies, 261; of natives, 256, 272, 275-277, 280 Taylor, F. W., 201-202 Tead, O., 210, 228 Tead and Metcalf, 178, 218 Teleology, 52, 54, 56, 316 Terman, L. M., 70, 74 Textile industry, 183-186, 261- 262 Thayer, W. R., 151 Thomas, A., 305 Thompson, C. B., 202 Thompson, D. W., 343 Thomson, J. J., 21 Thomson, W. M., 73 358 INDEX Thorndike, E. L., 73 Tolman, E. C, 21-22 Training department, 204-205 Troland, L. T., 21, 50 Tropics, control of, 250, 263 Tuberculosis, 124-125 Tufts, J. H., 85 Turkey, 264, 295, 306 Twenty-one Demands, 268 Typhoid fever, 123-124 TJnderhill, F. P., 343 Unemployment, 203, 248; inter- national, 299, 303-304 TJnited Mine Workers, in Colo- rado strike, 178-181; contract with Victor American Fuel Co., 216 United States, in Philippines, 257; in China, 266-267 U. S. Steel Corporation, 147, 187 Usher, A. P., 178 Veblen, T., 238, 245-246 Verrill, C. H., 199 Vertebrates, 57, 346-347 Victor American Fuel Co., 216 Vocational training, 74-75; 205- 206, 210 Waddle, C. W., 69 Wallace, A. E., 47-48 Wallas, G., 151 Wanamaker, J., revolution in business methods, 146; state- ment of principles, 147 War, 121; America's part in, 140; practical futility of, 236- 237; competition in arma- ments^ 239-241; cost, 242-243; Canada's part in, 270; effect on Egypt, 273-274; on Negroes in U. S., 287-288; on world trade, 299; change in moral standards, 327 War Labor Board, 199-200, 217, 219 Washington lumber industry, 181- 183, 195 Washington, B. T., 93 Water and sewage purification, 123 Watson, D. M. S., 56 Watson, J. B., 69 Webb, S. and B., 178 Welfare work, 196-197 Wells, H. G., ix, 165 West, G. P., 181 Weyl, W. E., 151 Wheat breeding, 99-100 Wheeler, W. E., 269 White, A. D., 28 White, W. A., 106 White, W. F., 286 Whitman, Walt, 41 William II, 235, 241, 264 Williams, J. E., 216 Williams, W., 211 Willys-Overland Co., 197 Winslow, C. H., 222 Wolf, E. B., 213-215 Wolff, H. B., 159 Woodruff, L. L., 49-50 Woolf, L. S., 294, 297, 303 Work, M. N., 291 Wright, q. D., 178, 180 Yellow fever, 126, 295 Zinsser, H., 106 Zulus, 278-281 o^ •ru.^ i,A.si D/^l^ 1T5J^ toO^ XS^^JlrB^X^O^^ o?25_:„^o«H ^--oro^^-j'o^c^jsn--- FOT^ ^ «ue T^^J^oU^f^ D^^ th^ ^^^lootn- ^ ^/^D6 /' UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY