li,,., Mm Mwmjkm m ^\mtt No. Division Range Shelf. Received :w-:-r' %r^ 'f^^. 51 ki CRITICAL A^^) EXPLANATOBY NOTES, ON MANY PASSAGES IN THE NEW TESTAMENT, WHICH TO COMMON READERS ARE HARD TO BE UNOEBSTUOD. ALSO^ V^, AN ILLUSTRATION V^ OF THE . GENLTNE BEAUTY AND FORCE OF SEVERAL OTHER PASSAGES. BT EZEKIfL J. CHAPMAN. A. M, ttnoti or A CHff&CH OF CHEIBT III BAV>TOLf t(t f* CANANDATOUA: rUMTfiD B7 JAMES D. BUMp 1819. RECOMMENDATIONS. THE follovring recommendations, from the Rer. Dr. Fitcb, late Pres- ident of Williamstown College, and the Rer. Mr. Taylor, formerlj a iVliaister of the Gospel in Deerlield, Mail, will afford tome evidence of the merits of this work : HAVING examined nearly the whole of the Work entitled, " Crit- ical and Explanatory JVotes, on difficult passages in the New Testament^ by the Rev. Esekiel J. Chapman," I find it to contain the substance of the opinions and expositions of the best critics and commentatocs, witii which I am acquainted, with original criticisms, remarks and ob- tervatious of the Autiior, which, in my view, manifest close atteotioo to the subjects, a critical knowledge of the original, good judgment and soundness in the faith. The work, in my opinion, corrects several errors in our common translation of the Scriptures, throws light on dif- ficull passages, and is calculated (o assist students in theology, and pri* Tale christians in their endeavors to know the true meaning of these parts of the sacred oracles. I can therefore cheerfully recommend the work to public patronage. EBENEZER FITCH. If'est-Bloowfteld, August 13, 1818. Having examined a part of the work entitled, "Critical and Ex- planatory Notes on difficult passages of the New Testament," by the Rer. EzEKicL J. Chapman ; and being satisfied tiiat it will be a useful publication, casliug much light un such passages — I do hereby recom« mend it to the patronage of the public. JOHN TAYLOR* Mendon^ August 17, 1818. PREFACE. THE Author of the following little work, has one request to raake. It is : that previously to any judg- ments being passed thereon, his object in publishing it may be understood. That is, in short, not so much to instruct the learned (though he hopes that some part of the work will be at least entertaining to them) as to furnish plain common people with a compendi- ous exposition of sucli passages of Scripture, as they have frequently proposed to him, and he presumes to many oiher ministers also, for explanation. Such exposition or explanation, may indeed be found in some of our best commentators, paraphrasts, and crit- ics ; but their works are in general too expensive to be bought, as well as too voluminous to be read, by the people in question. A compendium of judicious criticism and of explanatory remarks on some of the most important difficult passages of the New Testa- ment, designed for the benefit, and adapted to the un- derstandings, of the common people, has long appear- ed to him a desideratum in theology. Such a com- pendium he has endeavored to furnish. Of his suc- cess herein, others better informed and less interested in the reputation of the present work than himself, must judge. The author's object having been thus explicitly stated, he hopes that no considerate reader will think it strange, either that no more has been VI PREFACE. said, by way of explanation, on some of the many texts to which he has attended, or that so little has been said in the directly devotional strain. The reflecting reader will probably think of many other passages in the New Testament, which need some elucidation beside those inserted in the present Work. The author has confined himself to such as appeared to him most important to be explained. — With the Apocalypse of Bt. John he has had but little concern ; and for two reasons : almost the whole of that book is to an unusual degree symbolical, and of course very difficult to be explained, with any de- sirable precision, until tiie great events therein sym- bolized, shall have taken place. Besides, the expla- nation of it, even if practicable, would comprize such a vast body of historical facts, &c. that it could not be admitted within the designed limits of the present manual. For his assistance and ultimate success in prepar- ing the following work, he has carefully consulted some of tlie best biblical expositors now in use, as well as some of the most approved treatises on ancient manners and customs. Human authorities, for the confirmation of his criticisms and remarks, have been rarely appealed to in the body of the work ; but this was not because in general they could not be had, nor because they were not respectable ; but because his object already announced, did not appear to him to render such a procedure very necessary, and his de- signed brevity certainly did not render it possible. — Above all, he has diligently searched the Holy Scrip- PREFACE. VU tures in their original languages, determining to think for himself, auii asked for those illuminations of the Blessed Spirit, without which our light is darkness^ our knowledge ignorance, and our wisdom foll^, — May »' He guide us into all the truth." THE AUTHOR. Critical and Eotplanatonj Notts, i^-c. MATTHEW. Chap. iii. iS. " He will burn up the chaff with unquencliable fire."' — Tliis prediction of Jolin Bap- tist, alludes to the following practice of people in his days. Having winnowed the grain, and thus separ- ated the chaff from the wheat, they set lire to the for- mer on the windward side. The fire in that case had such an advantage over the chaff, that it would not cease until the chaff had been utterly consumed. — Thus the fire was unquenchable. And thus iigurative- ly, yet impressively, does tlie Baptist represent the worthlessness of hypocrites, (for they in a spiritual sense are the chaff) and also their complete and eter- nal ruin. Chap. v. 21. " Ye have heard that it hath been said by them of old tirae,'^ &c. — The original may as well, or more properly, be translated tiius : *' it hath been said to the ancients.'' The design of our Sav-* iour in this chapter, appears to have been to remind tlie Jews of those laws and prohibitions which the Lord had given to their fathers, as well as of those :;losses and erroneous constructions which had been put upon them by their faihers and rabbis^ 10 Chap. vi. 30. ^' Wherefore, if God so clothe fb« grass of the field, which to-day is, and to- morrow \% cast into the oven, shall He not much more clothe you, O ye of little faith?'' — From Docts. llussel and Shaw, we learn, that on account of the extreme scar- city of fuel, the easterns use the dry stalks of herbs and flowers, of rosemary, and of various other plants, to make fire, and to heat their ovens. To common readers, casting grass or herbage into ovens, sounds strange ; but such, for the reason just mentioned, has long been the practice in Judea, and in the countries adjacent. Chap. vi. 34. " Take therefore no thought for the morrow." — In the delivery of this precept, our Saviour designed not to prohibit or discourage absolutely all care and concern about our future temporal condition, but merely to repress solicitude or anxiety inhoni it; as must be evident both from the precise import of the original verb, which signifies to take anxious thought, and also from the fact that such absolute indiiference would be altogether inconsistent with the subsistence of people in the present life. Chap. v. 39. " But I say unto you, that yc resist not evil ; but whosoever shall smite thee on the right cheek, turn to him the other also/*' — The word evil in this passage denotes not the Evil One, for him we are expressly commanded to resist, (James iv. 70 nor the evil thing or moral evil sin ; for this we are command- ed both to resist and to mortify : but the evil jnan. the unreasonable and angry assailant. For proof of thk, Bt)thing more is necessary than a mere attention to tm 11 wliole passaHjc : •* £ say unto you, that ye resist not, or rather, not to resist evil ; but wJwsoever shall smite thee on the ri^ht cheek, turn to him the other also.'' With respect to the last clause of this verse, it is evident tiiat its spirit, rather than the letter of it, is to he regarded by us. The general duty of exercising and cultivating a forgiving disposition, in opposition to a retaliating and revengeful one, appears to be the who'le of what our Saviour intended by this injunc- tion. Chap. viii. S4?. "And Jesus saith unto him, see thou tell no man ; but go tliy way, shew thyself to the priest, and offer the gift that Moses commanded, for :i testimony unto them." — The gift here m6ntionodj denotes tlie gift, or off*ering, of birds and lambs, as pre- scribed in I^v. xiv. l-3''3, for the cleansed leper.— These he was to offer in presence of the Jewish priest? whose official duty it was to pronounce him in that case legally clean, and all this was to be done "for a testimony unto them," i. e. to the Jews, that the leper was legally cleansed. From the whole system of divine institutes, relative to the plague of leprosy, and particularly from the extreme caution and dili- gence with which the priest was to proceed in his ex* amination of him suspected to be the subject of it, we learn how careful and how faithful ecclesiastical judi- catories should be in examining and disciplining the members of their body, and especially those of them whose " spot is not the spot of God's children." For tUe loathsome disease of leprosy undoubtedly repre- sents sin the still more loathsome disease of the soul. 12 Ouce more : from our Lord's particular direction lo the healed leper, it is demonstrable that the JevvisU dispensation was not then abolished ; that on the con- trary, its ceremonial injunctions remained in undimin- ished force. Chap. xii. 43. " When the unclean spirit is gone out of a man, he walketh through dry places, seeking jrest and findeth none/*' &c. — From the expression in pur Englisii Bible, '* he walketii through dry places, seeking rest,'' many readers probably suppose that the dispossessed man is here meant. But this is a mis- take. It is not the man, but the unclean spirit who is here figuratively represented as walking through dry places, seeking rest, and finding none. One proof of this is, that, in tlie original Greek, the participles ren- dered seeking, having come, are in the neuter gender, and must of course, according to the rules of syntax^ agree with the antecedent — pneuma, spirit. — This passage is sometimes used to disprove the doctrine of the saints' final perseverance ; but that it is of no force at all for this purpose, is very evident : for not only does the passage treat exclusively of such demoniack pos- sessions as were peculiar to our Saviour's time, but al- so, it is wholly silent as to any good spirit's having ever been in the man. For surely to prove that the man ever fell from a state of grace, it must be made to appear that he ever had the root of the matter in him (for no man can fall from or lose that which he never had), and that this may be made to appear, some- thing more must be proved than merely that the evil spirit left him. — The parable before us is also appli- cable to tlifi Jews as a nation ; for the Saviour ejf- F 18 pie.ssly applied it to them. For havio^ remarked \\\0. the evil spirit went and took witli himself seven olhef spirits, more wicked than himself, and thus fortifted, re-entered his old habitation, He added, "even so shall it he also unto this wicked s;eneratiov.'' And as applied to them, it denotes that the hosts of hell and powers of darkness, perceiving that they were unable to withstand the artillery of truth, as m.anaged by John Bajjtist, Jesius ('hrist and his apostles, would flee for safety to the. Gentile nations : places which had always been dry, as they had never yet been watered from the " river of God.*' There, Iiowever, they would l)e as unable to find rest as before, for the apos- ties would surely " search them out through all the thousands of Israel y' yea, as the triumph of the Gos- pel among the Gentiles vtould be both more decisive and more general than it had been among the Jews, the evil spirit would perceive himself to be in great- er danger, and be more alarmed tlian before, and would accordingly return with sevenfold rage and vi- olence to his former possession — the Jewisli nation ; a prediction which, with awful exactness, has been fuK filled ujjon that devoted people. Chap. xiv. S6. " The disciples >vere troubled, saying. It is a spirit,^' i. e. a spectre, an apparition, for the original word is not pnkuma, but phantasma. Chap, xviii. 6. ^^ Whosoever therefore shall of- fend one of these little ones that believe in me, it were belter for him that a millstone were hung about his neck, and tJiat he were drowned in the depth of the sea." — The first and most common meaning of instant death was his portion — " it would grind him to powder." Christ here referreth to himself, as by way of eminence, the stone — the tried corner stone, mentioned by Isaiah and David — and is supposed hereby to illustrate the certain doom of two sorts of persons. Those who should fall upon him in pres- ent unbelief, and persecution ; and finally in cruci- fying him, would be broken — terribly punished — with the loss of spiritual privileges, and with griev- ous temporal calamities, in the approaching de- struction of Jerusalem (wherein, as Josephus says, 1,100,000 Jews lost their lives) — but a still more terrible punishment awaited those on whom this mighty stone should fall, in his final and tremendous wrath. It would " grind them to powder." There- fore, " Kiss the son lest he be angry, and ye per- ish from the way, when his wrath is kindled but a little." 86 JOHN. Chap. i. 16. *^ And of his fulness have all we received, and grace for grace." — The last clause of this verse, which, indeed, is the only part of it that requires explanation, has been variously understood and interpreted. Believers are here said to receive from the fulness of Christ grace for grace. What can be the precise meaning of this expression? — Without mentioning all the constructions of this phrase, which have been adopted by dift'erent ex- positors, I sliall merely suggest that, which, in con- sequence of mature deliberation, appears most rea- sonable. This will be done in the following para- phrase : From the abundant fulness that is in Christ, the incarnate word, have all we believers receive^ spiritual supplies in great profusion, and variety — and particularly grace for grace, i. e. there is grace in us answerable to grace in him — we have the same sort of dispositions as he had. He had them indeed with- out measure^ but we in measure, and we are hereby conformed to the image of him, who is "the first-born among many brethren.'' Horn. viii. 29. Chap. iii. 3. *^^ Jesus answered and said unto him. Verily, verily, I say unto thee, except a man be bora again, he cannot see the kingdom of God." — The Greek word anothen, here translated again, properly signifies /Vom above, and is accordingly thus translated in verse 81 of this chapter. The word man, in this passage, is generic — intending neither males of one a^e to the exclusion of those of another, nor indeed 9T the male sex to the exclusion of the female, but man, kind generally. In proof of this it may be observed, that the corresponding Greek word Tis,is thus generic signifying exactly, any one. From the whole there- fore, we may collect the following most important truths — that to enjoy eternal happiness, a spiritual change is necessary ; that this is necessary for every one, for the merely moral as well as for the openly profane ; and that for the production of this change, supernatural influence is necessary. Chap. iv. 20. '^ Our fathers worshipped in this mountain ; and ye say, that in Jerusalem is the place where men ought to worship." — To understand the import of this remark of the Samaritan woman, it is requisite to recur to a few facts in sacred history. It should however be first observed, that Mount Gerizim was the mountain to which this woman here refers/!^ Near to this mountain the patriarchs, and particularly Jacob, erected altars. Gen. xxxiii. 20, &c. and from it Moses pronounced the blessing, Deut. xxvii. X^^ * There was not however, any temple erected there uii-V til the time of Sanballat, the well known contempoNsJ rary and adversary of Nehemiah. From Josephus we learn, that this Sanballat, finding himself unable to, prevent the re-building of the Temple by Nehemi- ah, determined to build another of his own. He was, it seems, resolved to prevent the performance of di- vine worship, especially of sacrificial worship, a^ Jeru- salem ; and if he could not accomplish his object in one way, he resolved to do it in another. If the tem- ple must be built on Mount Zion, he would build another on Mount Gerizim. Hence^ as he supposed, SH the people would become divided, and thus his dar- ling object would be, at least in part, accomplished. Accordingly through his instrumentality a temple was built on the Mount Gerizira. And these two temples stood, in a state of mutual rivalry and opposition, for about S30 years ; and until Thircanus, an high priest of the Jews, destroyed the one on Mount Gerizim. But as long as this temple stood, the Samaritans re- sorted to it for worship ; and even after it was des- troyed, and no vestige of the edifice itself was visible, its very site was considered as holy ground, and was accordingly resorted to by the Samaritans for devo- tional purposes. Hence then the remark, and hence the meaning of the remark of the Samaritan woman : *' Our fathers worshipped in this mountain^ — But still the Jews believed that divine worship ought to be performed, and that especially sacrifices ought to be offered, at Jerusalem. And this opinion they, it seems, considered as sufficiently supported by such passages as 1 Kings xi. 33, &c. The truth is that both these sorts of people had been in an error — the wie for ascribing too much, and the other too little, importance to Jerusalem, and to worship as there performed. For although we read that " the Lord said to David, and to Solomon his son. In this house, and in Jerusalem, which I have chosen out of all the tribes of Israel, will I put my name forever," 2 Kings xxi. 7? yet this could not have been meant to intimate that any other place or temple was in itself unholy, or that worship elsewhere performed could have been for that reason unacceptable. Still less ground could there have been for the belief in the exclusive holiness of any particular temples or places since the advent of <|je Messiah, as the darkness then passed away and the true light shined. Hence said our Lord to the woman, " woman believe me, the hour eoraeth when ye sliall neither in this mountain nor yet at Jerusalem worship the Father — The hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth : for the Father seeketh such to worship Him." Chap. v. 31. ^'If I bear witness of myself, my witness is not tnie.'' — It is difficult to see why any man, and especially the " Faithful and true Witness," might not speak the trulh respecting himself as well as of any other person or thing. The meaning of Christ therefore, must have been, " If I ovli/ bear witness of myself, my testimony is not sufficient," i. e. is not what your law requires ; for that requires at least two or three witnesses ; and if this number were necessary for the condemnation of a criminal, Deut. xvii. 6, undoubtedly it must be to prove the divine mission of a prophet. That the word true in this verse means sufficient, and that our Lord here refer- red to the above mentioned requisition in the Jewish 'aw, further appears from his proceeding to mention three witnesses in his favor — that of his Father, verses .i2, 37 ; that of John Baptist, verse 33 ; and that of his own works, verse 36. Chap. xvi. 13. " Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth." — In the original the definite article is used — it is teen ALETHEiAN. The English translation then f re, ought to have been, " into all the truth." The necessity of 40 this interpretation appears not only from the circum- stance just mentioned, but also from another fact equally undeniable, viz. that it surely is not the office work of the holy Spirit to lead into truth and science of all kinds. The ordinary influences and teachings of the Holy Ghost, have no concern with any other truth than evangelical. Chap. xix. 11. *' Jesus answered. Thou couldest have no power at all against rae except it were given thee from above : therefore he that delivered me unto thee hath the greater sin." — The alone difficulty at- tending this passage is caused by the word therefore. For the inquiry arises, how could the circumstance that all Pilate's power against Christ was given him from above, be a reason why he that delivered Christ to Pilate had greater sin in than aifair that he ? The general import of this our Saviour's declaration is ob- vious. He herein implicitly reproved Pilate for his arrogance in pretending to so mu6h power against Him, and remindeth him that all this power was giv- en him from above. This phrase is by some referred to God. And unquestionably it must be admitted as a general trutli, that all the power which the Roman governor had and exercised against the Son of God, was given him originally and ultimately from Jehovah, to whom power, and all power belongeth, Ps. xlii. 11. But whether this were the truth which Christ here, meant to express, may well be questioned. It seems most natural to refer the. words from above, as here used, to the Jewish sanhedrim. That body might proi)erly have been said to be from above, not only because the temple, the place of its assembling, was both higher and on higher groiiiul than the pretoriuai, but also, because that body itself was instituted IVom above. And at any rate, in reference to tliat atfair, and the tragical event to which it was soon to lead,, the sanhedrim was, in the proper sense of the term, above Pilate ; for he acted merely as an executor of their decisions. And because the high priest and his council had been favored with so many more, and such greater advantages for knowing the divine will than Pilate, their sin was of course much greater than his. Chap. xx. 17. "Jesus saith unto her. Touch me not ; for I am not yet ascended to my Father : but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father ; and to ray God, and yonr God." — The question is, how could the circumstance, that Jesus had not yet ascended to his Father, be a reason why Mary might not touch him ? That this scripture may be rightly understood, its several claus- es must be considered connectively. The following paraphrase will, as is believed, illustrate the Sav- iour's meaning : * Touch me not, Mary, at present — i. e. do not stand indulging your private affection to- wards me — for I am not yet ascended to my Father, as you see, but shall yet spend some further time on earth with my disciples, so that you may hereafter have opportunity to see and be familiar with me. But for. the present I appoint you to other business. Go to my brethren, raid say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God.' We should be willing to forego private grati- lication, wiienever it interferes with the public good. F 4^ ACTS. Chap. i. 12. ^' Then returned tlicy unto Jerasa- lera, from the mount called Olivet, which is from Je- rusalem a sabbath-day's journey.'' — The sabbath- day's journey of the Jews was about two thousand cubits, eight furlongs, or in other words, about one mile. Perhaps one reason why this particular dis. tance was assigned, was, that this was the distance re- quired to be between the ark and the camp. Josiiua iii. 4. And as the tow^ns in Judea were commonly small, with respect to local extent, so this distance would be usually, as much as needed to be, travelled over by their inhabitants in order to reach their syn- agogues, the places of their Avorship. There may be no ground for supposing that the same' rigorous re- striction, if it may be so called, is now imposed on us : yet surely we may from hence lawfully conclude, that such travelling on the Sabbath as is practised by many persons at the present day, and that too for worldly purposes only, is highly improper and wrong. Chap. ii. 27. "Thou wilt not leave my soul in hell (eis adou), neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption." — This is a quotation from Ps. xvi. 10. It is evident that the primary reference of. the words was to David himself, and equally so, from St. Peter's application of them in Acts ii. 31, that they are referable principally and ultimately to Jesus Christ. The question then immediately arises — in what sense are they in this application to be under- stood ? That Christ should not be left in hell, is not at all incredible. But the thing implied in the declara- tion, viz. that Christ, or Christ's soul, was once tjiere, creates the difficulty. The following remarks may be useful, especially to common readers : — There are t\v(» Greek words which are translated hell — hadees and GEHENNA. I5ut their precise signification is very diilerent. Hadees or Adees, is derived from a and cideo, and means of course, invisible. It is synony. mous with the Hebrew sheole^ Hadees denotes sometimes :he grave, but more commonly the state of the dead, or the region and state of separate sj)irits after death ; whether that state be a state of happinesf or of misery. To the rich man, Luke xvi. 23, Hndees was a state of misery. We cannot however, infer, that he was in misery merely because he Avas in Hadees, for Lazarus was there also. But that the rich man was in misery, we infer solely from other circumstances : other expressions — such as ^' being in torments" — **' I am tormented in this flame," &c.-— They were both in Hadees, 1. e. the state or region of departed spirits ; 1)ut to the one Hadees was ^' joy un^ speakable" — to the other, "everlasting burnings." But neither Slieole nor Hadees have, in themsplves nisideredj any connexion with future punishment, as will be evident to any one who will examine, in the Hebrew bible and In the Septuagint translation, the following passages, viz. Gen. xlii. 38, Isa. xiv. 9, and \xxviii. 10. See also, llev. xx. 14. — But Gehenna denotes properly the place of torment. It is derived . from the Hebrevv words ge, and hinnom, i. e. the val- ( ley of Hinnom. See Joshua xv. 8. In this valley, otherwise called Tophet, the idolatrous Israelites Caused their children to pass through the fire to Mo^ 44 lech. S Kings xxiii. 10, &e. From its having beeu the place of such horrid crimes and abomhiations and miseries, it came to pass, in process of time, that the word Gehenna was made to signify the future state of sin and punishment. If no\y the inquiry be, in what sense Ci)rist went to hell, or in other words, what is meant by Acts ii. 27? the verse before us, the reply is — all that is meant by it is, that he was, for a season, not in Gehenna the place of torment, but in Hadees the state of the dead, or region of departed spirits. And in tliat state neither his soul nor body was lefl, but he rose again and triumphed over the grave. Chap. vi. 1. " And in those days when the numr bcr of the disciples was multiplied, there arose a mur- muring of the Grecians against the Hebrews, because their widows were neglected in the daily minis- tration." — The word translated Grecians is not elle- NOWN, but ELLENiSTOWN, and denotes of course, not the descendants of Javau or proper Greeks, but the Grecised Jews, or as they are commonly called, Hel- lenists. These persons used the Septuagint, or Greek translation of the Old Testament. Chap. ix. 7? compared with xxii. 9. ^^ And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hear- ing a voice, but seeing no man,'' But in ch. xxii. 9, it is said, " And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid ; but they heard uot the voice of him that spake to me." — All the difficulty at- tending these passages arises from their apparent con- tradiction. For in the first it is said that Paul's fel- low^ travellers heard a voice, and in the last that they 45 heard uot tbe voice. Now on first inspection, it is evi- dent that either there is in reality a contradiction be- twecn these two statements — the one of St. Luke res- pecting Paul, and the other of St. Paul respecting himself, or the word akouo (hear), is used in diifer- ent senses in these two passages. The latter is un- doubtedly the truth. In the Greek classics, as Kype has shown, the word akouo is sometimes used to sig. nify understanding, as well as hearing. The same word is so used, and so translated, in 1 Cor. xiv. S. And so manifestly is it to be understood, in Acts xxii. 9. There is therefore no contradiction between these two passages. Taken together their meaning is this : Paul's companions heard a voice, i. e. heard a noise, a sound, yea, heard the voice itself, though they nei- ther understood, nor distinctly heard the articulate words which were spoken. They heard the voice, but did nut understand it. Chap. xiv. 15. " — Sirs, why do ye these things ? we also are men of like passions with you, and preach unto you, tliatye should turn from these vanities unto the living God,'' &c. — It is probable that the most of common readers understand the word passions, here, in its bad sense. For their information therefore^ it should be observed, that it should by no means in this place be restricted to that sense. In the original, the word translated " of like passions*' is omoiopatheis. The same word occurs in James v. 17. But whether we regard the precise import of the word itself, or the main scope of the apostles in this their expostulation with the men of Lystra, we must be convinced that they meant hereby to tell them something more 46 or other, than iaej-ely that ihey were depraved rhA wicked like themselves. It seems that the Lystrans at first supposed that Paul and Barnahas were some supernatural celestial beings, because Paul liad just wrought a miracle before their eyes ; that they were, in short, some of their deities. Hence they call- ed Barnabas Jupiter, and Paul Mercurius, and were for immediately offering sacrifices to them. To dis- suade them from such idolatrous and sacrilegious ado- ration, the apostles " rent their clothes and ran in among the people, crying out — Sirs, why do ye tliese things ? we also are men of like passions with you," &c. Now it should be remembered that the Lystrans. as well as other heathens generally, believed already that their deities were in fact of like passions with themselves. But this their belief was no impediment, but rather an excitement to their worshipping them. For the apostles therefore merely to have announced to the Lyslrans that they, their supposed deities, were of like irrascible, or voluptuous, or ambitious passions with themselves, would not have served either to af- ford them any new information, or to have restrained them from their meditated idolatry. What the apos- tles then most directly meant in this declaration, was, to teach the Lystrans zr/io, rather than ivhat, they really were ; that they were not '^ gods in the likeness ef men/' as they supposed, but mere men, their fel- low mortals, subject to the same infirmities, calamities and mortality with themselves. Chap, xxvii. 33. ^^ And while the day was com- ing on, Paul besought them all to take meat, saying, this day is the fourteenth day that ye have tarried 47- . and continued fasting, having taken nothing.'^ — If the Greek scholar will observe the punctuation in Griesbacb, and attend also to the participle here used, he will perceive, that, in tlie opinion of that emi- nent linguist, the last clause of this verse may as well be translated thus : * Expecting the fourteenth day (which is to day) ye continue fasting, having taken nothing.' According to this rendering, the meaning is, that so anxious were the sailors in ex- pectation of the fourteenth daj', wiiich was just at hand, and when they supposed their danger would be the greatest, that they had either forgotten or neg- lected to eat, having taken nothing. The above con- uction is also embraced by several eminent crit- ■ s. This verse then need not be understood as teaching that the sailors had wholly fasted for fourteen days. Indeed without a miracle this could not have been possible ; for ordinarily, a person cannot live beyond eight or ten days without nourish* raeat. m ROMANS. Chap. i. 17- " For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith, as it is written, the just shall live by faith.'' — What is to be understood by the expression, " revealed from faith to faith" ? The word pistis (faith), in the first instance may de- note an important object of our faith, viz. the faith- fulness of God ; and in the last, that internal act of the creature which we usually call faith. In short, the general import of this verse appears to be, that in the gospel, God, from or in the exercise of his faithfulness, revealeth to our faith his glorious right- eousness, — or revealeth his righteousness and faith- fulness as objects to be believed by us Chap. iv. 4, 5. "Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt. But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justi- fieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteous- ness.'' — Works are of two kinds : works of the law, and works of faith ; or, as they are sometimes called, works legal, and works evangelical. Now working of the first sort, is evidently meant by St. Paul in these verses. His meaning was as if he had said, * To him that worketh on legal principles, the re- ward, in case there were any, would be of course considered as a debt. But to him that worketh not, i. e. on legal principles^ but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, that seeks justification not by works but from mere grace through faith, his faith is counted for righteousness.' Surely nothing could have been further from the apostle's meaning, thali to assert, either that a true believer does not work at all, or that the final reward of such an one will be a reward of debt. Chap. v. 7. " For scarcely for a righteous man will one die ; yet perad venture for a gooil man some would even dare to die." — But why not be as Avilling to die for the one as the other, for are they not both one and the same character ? In reply, it may be ob- served, that as the righteous man and the good man are here manifestly contrasted to each other, so, in the judgment of St. Paul, they must have been separate and different beings. By a righteous man, therefore, seems intended, a moral man, or at best one who is blameless, touching the righteousness which is of the law, in the sense in which the writer himself was while a pharisee — and by the good man, an evangel- ically pious one. This distinction may serve also to illustrate the true meaning of Ezek. xviii. 24. Chap. vi. I7. "But God be thanked that ye were the servants of sin ; but ye have obeyed from the heart that form of doctrine which was delivered you.'^ — As to the first part of this verse, it is evident, that the word irhereas, or although, is to be understood. Thus — ' God be thanked, tliat although ye were onc& the servants of sin, ye have obeyed from the heart that form of doctrine,' &c. : for surely it is very absurd to suppose, that the benevolent soul of the apostle would have rejoiced, or been thankful, merely because his Ro- man converts had once been sinful, and of course mis- erable. 50 With respect to the last clause, it must be observedj that exactly translated it would run thus — "ye have obeyed from the heart that form of doctrine into which ye have been delivered.^ The expression is metaphor- ical, and highly expressive. Jt alludes to melted met- als being cast into their respective moulds, xls these metals, in consequence of being cast into their moulds, assume of course a shape — a configuration similar to that of the moulds themselves — so it is witli the souls of believers. They are cast, as it were, into the mould of the gospel, and are moulded accordin2;ly. " How forcible are right word s,'^ even " the words which the Holy Ghost teacheth" ! Chap. vii. 1. " Know ye not, brethren, (for I speak to them that know the law,) how that the law hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth ?"' — In the last part of this verse, our translators have inserted the pronoun he. As, however, there is no nominative in the original (although one is evidently understood), it becomes us to inquire, what, from the the connexion, that nominative should be. Now for our assistance, and ultimate success herein, it should be remembered, that in the context, the apostle is drawing a parallel between the dominion of the law over a man, and that of a husband over his wife. In this parallelism, the law is considered as having the same relation to man as the husband has to the Avife. The question is, what does the apostle here mean by law, and what by man ? If it could be proved, that by law he meant the ceremonial law, and by man only Jews of antecedent generations, i. e. such Jews as lived during the time that law was in force, then the ATI pronoun he Mould in this place be a proper word. For un(lonl)tedly the ceremonial law had dominion over such Jews, and tiiat too as lonj; as they lived, liut by law, here, St. Paul must have meant the moral law. This is evident, as well from other considera- tions as from this — tliat in tlie 7tli verse, he illustrates his main argument by instancing in one of the pre- cepts of that law, viz. the tenth : " Thou shalt not covet.-' And by man, St. Paul must have meant mankind, or to be sure such men as he was then writ- ing to (the greatest part of whom were Gentiles), else his remarks on this subject would not have been ap- propriate. It seems then, that in the last part of this verse, the pronoun it ought to be substituted for he ; for it should be remembered that the word law, here represents man — and that the word man, here repre- sents the woman, or the wife : but surely it would be improper to say that Die husband has dominion over his wife as long as she lives, if, as often liappens, he dies first. Further — it is not strictly true that the law has dominion over a man " as long as he liveth,'^ for believers " are not under the law, but under grace." Ch. vi. 14. In short, in this veiMse and in the context, 1)elievers are spoken of as in a conjugal relation— ^as having had one husband, viz. the law, and as now, in their converted state, having another, viz. Jesus Christ. And as the church cannot have two husbands at once^ so of course, wlien married to Christ, she becomes " free from her former husband," the law. The law becomes of course, now and ever afterwards, dead with respect to her. Verse 6. Chap. viii. 16. "The Spirit itself beareth wit 52 neas with our spirit, that we are the children of God.** — Whether this scripture ought to be considered as '•^ hard to be understood'^ or not, it is undeniable that by many it has not been understood rightly. I refer to the '^ icitness of the spirit*' here mentioned. This has been understood by some, to mean a certain im- pulse on, or suggestion to, the mind, (perhaps both an inexpressible and unaccountable one.) that the person is a child of God. But if we carefully attend to the sense in which the word icitness is commonly used in the scriptures, we shall find it is not in this sense. See, as specimens, John v. 37 : ^^ But I have greater witness than that of John; for tlie works which the Father hath given me to finish, the same works that I do, bear witness of me that the Father hath sent me." Acts xiv. 3 : " Long time therefore abode they speak- ing boldly in the Lord, which gave testimony or wit- ness unto the word of his grace, and granted signs and wonders to be done by their hands." Do. v. 17 : <* Nevertheless he left not himself without witness, in. that he did good, and gave us rain from heaven, and fruitful seasons, filling our hearts with food and glad- ness." In all these passages, the word witness is ev- idently used as denoting proof — evidence. In the same, or similar sense, is this word to be understood in the verse before us. The idea is, that the Spirit beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the chil- dren of God, not by some sudden and unaccountable suggestion or impulse, but by affording us evidence — proof of the matter — evidence drawn from the habitu- al temper of our minds, and tenor of our practice. Have we any thing of this witness ? 58 f Chap. ix. 1 — *. •*! say the truth in Christ, 1 lie not, my conscience also bearing rae witness in the Holy Ghost, Tliat I have great heaviness, and con- tin uil sorrows in m}' heart. For I could wish that my SIM r were accursed from Christ, for my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh." — The third verse espeoiaUy requires explanation. It has been under- stood by some, and by some distinguished divines too, to mean that St. Paul was willing to be eternally damned for the glory of God, and the salvation of his bretiiren, the Jews. If indeed such were his spirit, and if iiis design in this place was to declare it, one of these two conclusions is inevitable — either 1. Paul did not feel rightly — to say the least, felt enthusiastic- ally at that time — or 2. Such is the spirit of true chris- tians, especially of eminent christians like Paul ; such the dictate of genuine benevolence, and such of course ought to be the spirit of every christian. The firs^ part of the alternative will hardly be adopted by any intelligent christian. The last therefore, according to the present hypothesis, remains. Whether the doc- trine, that we ought to be willing to be damned for the glory of God, can derive any sufficient support eitlier from the nature of true benevolence, abstractly consid- ered, from analogical reasoning, or from any other passages of scripture, is not at present either affirmed or denied. One thing is evident — thi3 passage does not prove the doctrine : for 1. The verb euchomeen is in the imperfect tense, and, exactly translated, signifies, * I did wish or boast/ i. e. while a Pharisee. a. Even if the verb must be understood as expres sing St. Paul's feelings when he wrote this epistle, 54: still there is no need of supposing that the doctrine before mentioned is at all countenanced by such a pa- thetic and energetic declaration. For then the in- quiry is — what is to be understood by the expression " accursed from Christ*' ? This is the key to the whole. First let us inquire, what is meant by the word accursed ? Now the word in the original is a noun, ANATHEMA, denoting in general a person or thing ac- cursed — devoted to destruction, not however always, perhaps not commonly — to destruction in a future world. Tn the Septuagint, this word always answers to the Hebrew cherem, " which in like manner de- notes in general, total separation from a former state or condition, and particularly either things or persons devoted to destruction.'' (Parkhurst.) I may add, that temporal destruction only is the most that the word cherem or charam, and its derivations signify, almost always, perhaps in every instance of their oc- currence, in the Hebrew bible. Let the Hebrew scholar examine, among a vast multitude of other scrip- tures, Deut. vii. 26, Joshua vi. 17> 18, and vii. IS. — Let us next inquire into the meaning of the preposition from (apo), as used in this passage. Now this some- times denotes, after the example of, as in S Tim. i. 3: "I thank God whom I serve /rom my forefathers" — i. e. after the example of my forefathers. From these observations it is evident, that the meaning of the apostle in this so much controverted passage, may he only this, viz. that for his brethrens' sakes — for the promotion of their eternal good — he was willing to be accursed or devoted to destruction, after the example of Christ — i. e. to be even crucified as he was. Yea, Qf5 oil the supposition tliat he here expresses his state of mind >vhile a christian, and not while a Fharisee, such must be his meaning. For in John xv. 8, our Saviour represents it as the hv^haiii possible expression of love to our friends, that we should be willing to lay down our life, i. e. our natural life, for them. Besides, the damnation of the future world includes unrestrained and everlasting enmity to God, as well as mental remorse and corporeal pain. Whether therefore St Paul should be understood as expres- sing his state of mind before or after his conversion, it is manifest that there is no necessity of supposing that he had here any reference at all to future punish- ment. The same remark, by the way, may be made in reference to the prayer of Moses, Kx. xxxii. 32 ; for from attending to the whole chapter, it will ap- pear that all he meant by the ])etition was, that if his people could not be forgiven, but must die, he wished to die with them ; that the idea of being himself made a great nation, according to the promise in verse 10, could never reconcile him to the idea of their des- truction. Chap. xi. 24. "For if thou wert cut out of the olive tree, which is wild by nature, and wert graffed contrary to nature into a good olive tree,*' &c. — In this chapter, in the context especially, the apostle is treat- ing of the future restoration and conversion of the Jews, and of tiieir incorporation with the Gentiles, or rather of the Gentiles' incorporation with them in an ecclesiastical connexion. Tlie Jews and the Gen- tiles are represented by the metaphor of olive trees. The Jewish church is said to be the good olive tree, 56 and the Gentiles, in their pagan state, arc called the wild olive tree. The apostle, speaking to the Koman Gentiles, says, '^ thou wert cut out of the olive tree, which is wild by nature, and wert graffed contrary to nature into a good olive tree." The expression, when divested of all metaphor, evidently means, that the Roman Gentiles had been taken out of their wild bar- ren pagan state, i. e. had been delivered from it, and had become incorporated with the real and fruitful church of God, i. e. with God's ancient church, which had been, in essence, continued as well as purified? and much improved under the christian dispensation. But let us attend more particularly to the phraseology of the apostle, in verse 24, that we may see how in- structive, and how impressive it is. Now there is herein an evident allusion to the practice (so frequent as well in ancient as in modern times) of grafting fruit trees. But the particular object of our present atten- tion, is the manner in which the apostle describes the grafting of the Gentiles into the stock of God's an- cient Israel. This, he says, was "confrar^ to na- ture.^^ 1. The grafting itself was contrary to nature and custom. For when men graft their trees, their design uniformly is to improve their fruit ; not only to make the same tree more fruitful, but also to cause it to bear better fruit than it did before. Thus, a scion of a good apple-tree is grafted into a crab apple-tree ; but the converse of this is not true. Men do not, unless infatuated, or prompted by mere curiosity of making a useless experiment, graft the scion of a crab tree into a genuine and good apple-tree. In short, the scion grafted in, is always considered as superior in quality to the old stock into which it is grafted. But it was not so in the case before us. The Roman Gentiles were cut out of the wild olive tree. They were the scion of a very had tree, of iL tree that hrouj^ht forth no fruit except wild fruit, and as suchf were grafted into a good olive tree — a tree unspeakably better than the parent stock of this scion. There was something therefore, in the grafting itself, which was contrary to nature. 2. The consequence^ also, of this grafting, was coh- trary to nature. For after the scion or branch of one tree is graifed into another, it still bears the fruit of the parent stock : but it is not so here. The Gen- tiles after their ingrafting into the good olive tree, bore the fruit not of the parent stock, not of theil* old wild olive, but of the good olive tree into which they were graifed. How instructive and impres- sive then, is the expression, " contrary to nature,'' as here used, when abstractedly considered ! — But it ought not to be considered in this manner merely. For it has an important bearing on a very important subject. This verse taken even by itself, and especially in connexion with the whole para- graph, teaches the essential identity of the two churches — the Jewish and the Christian. More di» rectly still, it teaches, in opposition to the doctrine of some in our days, the glorious excellency of the church of Jehovah under the former dispensation. From this passage, and from the whole context, it is evident that that church was not a mere civil com- munity, nor merely an ecclesiastico-political society, as some choose to term it — but a real church of the living God ; a good olive tree, fair and of goodly H 58 fi-uit. See Jer. xi. 16. Such surely il was witb respect to its constitution, and the divine requisitions, whatever may have been from time to time the con- duct or character of many of its members. Chap. xii. 6. *^ — ^- whether prophecy, let us prophecy according to the proportion of faith." — The original word here used, is analogian, analogy. The exhortation must be understood as meaning, cither that the frequency and measure of their prophecying should be according to their personal faith and gifts, or, which appears most probable, that all their prophe- cyings, i. e. all their expositions of scripture, all their instructions, — should be according to the gener- al analogy of faith, according to the general scheme or system of doctrines exhibited in tlie sacred volume. This last interpretation supposes, of course, tliat such a system is contained in the scriptures. Such accord- ingly has been the sentiment of some of the best di- vines. Whether they have happily succeeded in their attempts to expose this system or not, the attempt is laudable, nor is success herein impossible. Chap. xiv. 5. '* One man esteemeth one day above another ; another esteemeth every day alike. Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind." —It is well known that this scripture has been fre- quently referred to the christian sabbath, and that some have even inferred from it, that it is compara- tively a matter of indifference, whether the day, so called, be sanctified or not ; or that at least every man's practice, as to this matter, should be regulated by his own private opinion, whatever that may happen 59 to be, respecfing tlic sabbath. But from the coiinex- ion, it is very evident that the text before us is refera- ble, not at all to the Lord's day, but solely to certain ceremonially holy days. It should be remembered, that the church of Rome waa composed partly of Jews and partly of Gentiles. The Jewish part being still *' zealous of the law,'' were for observing, in distinction from other days, their new moons — their various feast-days, &c. But the Gentile part «uppos. ed that the difference, in respect to sanctity, which had previously existed among those days, and other week days, had l)een annihilated when Jesus expired on the cross. Hence then we have the true and sole meaning of the apostle's declaration, " One man es- teemeth one day above another; another esteemeth ev- erj" day alike.'" Chap. xiv. 6. <• — He that eateth, eateth to'thc Lord, for lie givelh God thanks ; and he that eateth not, to the Lord he eateth not, and giveth God thanks." — To understand this passage, the above remark, res- pecting the component parts of the Roman church, must be remembered. The Jews of that church, con- scientiously abstained from the use of certain meats, on the supposition that they were unclean. The Gen- tiles, on the contrary, believed tliat to " the pure all things were pure" — they had no scruple as to the law- fulness and propriety of partaking of those same meats, and accordingly did partake of them as freely as of any others. Now the apostle here supposes, and teaches, that both these sorts of persons acted consci- entiously. And the sentiment he meant to express in this place, is manifestly this, viz : ' those who ate 60 those meats, ate them to the Lord, giving Him thanks for the same ; and those who abstained therefrom, did so conscientiously' — or " to the Lord," while at the same time they gave Him thanks for the blessings which they did enjoy. Chap. xiv. 22. " Hast thou i'aith ? have it to thy- self before God." — This is not to be understood as forbidding a public profession of religion : For the faith here mentioned, is evidently a faith relative to the same matters which had been already mentioned, such as days, meats, &c. St. Paul's idea was, that those of the Roman church who believed that there was such an important difference between those meats, days, &c. as that some of them were holy and some unholy, should keep this their faith to themselves, and not trouble their brethren with it. It would be well in these days, if this advice were more regarded. 61 I. CORINTHIANS- Chap. i. 10. " that there "be no divisions among you," &c. — The word schisma, of which the plural la here used, and translated divisions, literally ' signifies a rent, tearing, &c. In its raetaphorica ap- plication to a church, it denotee alienation of affee- tion — a dividing, separating spirit, and seems not to refer to doctrinal sentiments, further or otherwise than as they produce such divisions and separations. Chap. i. S6. " For you see your calling, breth- ren, how that not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called.'^ — There is nothing in the original which answers to the passive verb are called. Some suppose, therefore, that the active verb call, would be as proper, and that the apostle's reference in this passage was, not to the subjects of divine calling, but to the instruments by, or through, whom the Corinthians had been called. In brief, the precise meaning of the apostle appears to be as if he had said, ' Ye see the manner of your calling, brethren, i. e. ye see who they arc that call you. Evidently they are not men of worldly wisdom, and persuasive eloquence — not the mighty ones of the earth — not those of noble birth. Such are not the persons whom God hath sent to call you. No, but for this purpose He hath sent us, who are considered by the world as foolish, weak, base and despicable.' The whole context seems to justify and require this interpretation. See, particularly, verses S5, S7, 28, S9. It is undoubtedly true that not many wise men after the flesh, not mnny mighty, not many noble, — are effectually called to "glory and virtue'' here, and to " eternal life'' hereafter ; but this does not appear to have been the truth intended by the apostle in this place. Chap. ii. 9, 10. ^' But as it is written, eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love Him. But God hath revealed them unto us by his Spirit.'^ — To understand these verses, we must consider them in connexion : and hence it will be evident that the word man, in the 9th verse, denotes not man absolutely, or generically j not what we mean by the term mankind, — but the natural, animal or unrenewed man. The apostle's meaning was, that although such a man had not seen, and could not properly conceive of, "the good of God's chosen" — yet that to the saints generally, and to the apostles particularly, this glorious subject had been revealed by the Spirit. Chap. iv. 4. "For I know nothing by myself, yet am I not hereby justified, but He that judgeth me is the Lord." — But what can be the. meaning of the first part of this verse, ^^ I know nothing by my- self, yet am I not hereby justified" ? The general sentiment Paul meant here to convey, must have been as follows, viz. that though he knew nothing of evil by, in or with himself, i. e. though he was not conscious to himself of guilt in the commission of any known sin, or in the omission of any known duty, whether as a christian or as an apostle — yet lie could not be hereby justified before God. If justification could be either absolutely, or, aa it were, by the deeds of the law, still, on that ground, something more than a negative righteous- ness would be necessary. Pre-eminently, then, is this the case, on the ground of that divine economy, which wholly excludes our own righteousness, both negative and positive, from having any agency in such justification. Chap. v. 11. "But now I have written unte you, not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother bfe a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolator, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner, with such an one no not to eat."— The eating here pro- hibited, appears to be eating at common meals : for, 1. The very phraseology here used, seems to re- quire this construction. The direction of the apostle, with respect to the treatment of this corrupt person, was two-fold — general and particular. The general direction was, not to "keep company" with him. The particular direction was, " no not to eat. — Now here is evidently a descent from the greater to the less. From the very pliraseology of tiie apostle, it appears that the least or lowest kind of association and inter- course, is here meant. But certainly, eating at the Lord's table, is one of tlie highest expressions and acts of christian intercourse and communion. S. That eating at common meals is here intended, appears " yet far more evident," from comparing the passage with Mat. xviii. 17 — '' if he neglect to hear the church, let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican." It is well known that the Jews, 64 in our Lord's time, would not eat at common meals with publicans, and sinners, and heathens. Now as the corrupt and irreclaimable brother was to be treat- ed as an heathen man, and a publican, and as the Jews would not eat with such, even at common meals. — so this direction of our Lord, must, it seems, prohibit such an eating with such an irreclaimable brother. But though eating at common meals be directly meant, by the words of the apostle now under con- sideration, yet there can be no doubt that by im- plication they forbid eating at the Lord's table also. If the prohibition extends to the less, it surely must to the greater. One remark more : This apostolical canon seems necessarily to admit an exception in favor of near relatives and connexions, as of bus- bands, wives, parents, children, &c. : for in their case prior obligations exist ; obligations arising from their peculiar relation to each other ; obligations too, which Christianity never was designed to cancel, but rather to illustrate and enforce. Chap. vi. 4. *^ If then ye have judgments of things pertaining to this life, set them to judge, who are least esteemed in the church." — The inquiry is, who are meant by the ^^ least esteemed in the ChurcWP Now it should be observed, that the original word properly signifies despised. Accordingly it is some- times rendered despised — sometimes set at naught. See Luke xviii. 9, and xxiii. 11 ; Horn. xiv. 3, Acts iv. 11. In short, in other passages, where it occurs, it usually cpnveys a bad meaning, and is at the same time strongly expressive of that meaning. It appears, at any rate, a very improper word to be applied by christians to their christian brethren. For this rea son, as well as from the general scope of the con- text, it is presumable that by the least esteemed or despised, St. Paul intended heathen magistrates. Accordingly, by some of the best critics, and in Griesbach's edition of the New-Testament, the whole verse is read interrogatively, thus : '' If, then, ye have judgments of things pertaining to this life, do ye set them to judge who are least esteemed in the church" ? And this appears well to suit the main argument of the apostle. For in the context he treats on the subject of christians going to law, one with another, and reproves them, if not absolutely, for going to law ; yet for going to law before unbelievers, i. e. unbelieving magistrates. Verses 1, 0. He ar- gues from the greater to the less, thus : if the saints are counted worthy to judge the world, and angels too — i. e. to be assessors with Christ in the general judgment, then certainly they are competent to judge upon, and decide worldly matters. And in verse 0, he expresses his astonishment and regret, that there should not be a wise man among them, who should be able to judge between his brethren in their unhappy differences and disputes about worldly matters. And as, in verse 4, he is evidently upon the same subject^ and administering the same reproof, so it would be very natural to understand him here, as saying — *If then ye have judgments of things pertaining to this life, do ye indeed set heathen magistrates to judge-*- those who are least esteemed in the Church — men, who as to their moral characters, are in fact, least esteemed and often despicable ?' The main point at which St. Paul aimed in the whole of this expostulation, wa« to 66 prevent the Corinthians from going to law before heathen magistrates, and to prevail on them to refer their differences to an arbitration of tlieir chris- tian brethren for adjustment. Chap. vii. 25. " Now concerning virgins, I have no commandment of the Lord : yet I give my judg- ment, as one that hath obtained mercy of the Lord to be faithful." — Hence some have inferred that Paul •was not always under inspiration when he wrote his epistles, but contented himself at times with the delive- ry of his own individual opinion ; that, to be sure, such was the case with respect to this passage. With res- pect to this inference, it is natural to remark, that on supposition of its justness, all those other parts of Paul's writings, in which he does not express any hesi- tancy as to Ills inspiration, are to be considered as di- vinely inspired, of course. But the truth is, all St. Paul meant, was simply this, viz. that with respect to virgins, the Lord had not seen lit to give him any express directions, as He had done with respect to a man's putting away his wife, and a wife's putting away her husband. Surely we are not to conclude, that Paul was not under inspiration, merely because such inspiration did not extend to every conceivable subject. Chap. ix. 24 — S6. "Know ye not, tliat they which run in a race run all, but one receiveth the prize ? So run, that ye may obtain. And every man that striveth for the mastery is temperate in all things. Now they do it to obtain a corruptible crown ; but we an incorruptible. I therefore so run, not as uncertain- 67 ly." — These verses manifestly refer to the races per- formed at the Isthmian games. Though to some of them there were several prizes, and of different value, yet to those here referred to, there belonged only one- The hope of winning it stimulated alike each of the racers. And that they raighc '^ not run in vain,*' they had previously habituated themselves to the strictest temperance as to eating and drinking, and every arti- cle of sensual indulgence. But after all, the prize in view, if obtained, would be of very little service or value, for it was only a crown or garland of the leaves of a wild olive tree. Nevertheless, from those races the apostle drew spiritual instruction. As often as he witnessed them, he resolved that he would " run the race set before him,*' witli at least equal agility and vigor, and that he might run not as uncertainly, would habituate his body to at least equal temperance and subjection : and he here exhorts his Corinthian con- verts, and through them, all christians, to do so like- wise. How important it is for us, like the apostle, to derive spiritual instruction from natural objects ! Chap. x. 20. " But I say, that the things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils, and not to God" — i. e. daimoniois to demons. There are in the original three words, which by our translators are ren- dered devils, viz. diabolos, daimown, and daimoni- ox. The former commonly denotes the fallen angels^ and stil) more commonly the arch-apostate Satan.— r Sometimes however, when used in the plural number, the word is applied to human beings, as in 1 Tim. iii. 11 : " Even so must their wives be grave, not slau- dercrs," mee diabolous. See; also; 3 Tim. iii. 3. and 68 Titus ii. 3. Tlie word properly signifies a false ac^ cuser or slanderer, and when the singular article is prefixed (as o diobolos), it denotes satan. — Daimowu, and daimonion, are nearly synonymous, and convey, each of them, a somewhat different meaning from dia- bolos. With respect to daimonion, the word now un- der consideration, the word used in the passage be- fore us — as used by the heathens, it signified gener- ally, an intermediate class of spirits, whose grade of existence was supposed to be in a sort of medium be- tween God and man, and sometimes also, the departed deified spirits of good and virtuous men. But though by heathen writers the term is frequently used in a good sense, yet in the sacred scriptures of the New Testament, it is invariably used in a bad sense, with the exception only of Acts xvii. 19. If now the in- quiry be, what is the direct meaning of the scripture before us — " I say, that the things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils (demons), and not to God'' ? the best reply appears to be this — it means, that though in offering their sacrifices, they designed to offer them to demons in their sense of the term, i. e. either to an intermediate class of beings, between Je- hovah and men, or to the departed deified spirits of illustrious men (for it does not appear that the Gen- tiles ever did designedly worship the fallen angels), yet that in reality they offered them to evil spirits, evil demons. In either case, the idolatry would be shocking ; but in the last far most so. Chap. xi. 10. " For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head, because of the angels." — The word power (exousian), evidently refers to the 69 vail or covering which the woman wore on hci- head. Such was anciently the custom of the Greeks, Romans and Jews, when they appeared in worshipping assem- hlies. Even the Jewish priests wore a kind of tur- ban on their heads when they ministered at the tem- ple. From them probably was this custom borrowed by the Corinthian church. This covering, as worn by the women in apostolic times, was a token both of their modesty and subjection to their husbands. But what can be meant by the expression, " because of the angels" ? Though the scriptures use the w'ord angels in various senses, and sometimes intend thereby mere men (Rev. ii. 1, 8, 12, 18, &c.), yet the most natural interpretation of the term in this place, is — that it de- notes those super-human celestial beings, who are usually meant tlicreby. And the apostle appears here to teach, by implication, that they are occasion- ally, though of course invisibly, present in the wor- shii)ping assemblies of christians, to observe whether the due order and spirituality are there preserved, as well as to assist in their devotions. What an awful motive, by the way, is this for us to keep our hearts as well as our feet, when we go to the house of God ! Chap. xi. 28. '^ But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup.'^ — The word dokimazo, here translated examine, properly signifies to try, prove, or examine a thing with respect to its quality or nature ; to ascertain whether it be genuine or not. In its original and lit- eral acceptation, it was applied to metals, such as sil ver, gold, &c. These were cast into the fire, and thus were dokimazomenoi, i. e. tried, in order that it 70 might appear whether they were, or how much of them was, genuine gold and silver, and how much dross. True, the word in this passage is used meta- phorically ; but evidently with an allusion to its primary and literal import. Hence, then, we have the true meaning of St. Paul, in this passage. It was not, as some have supposed, that the Corinthians should examine themselves with respect to their needs only — but it was that they should examine, prove, try themselves, with respect to character, that they might know what manner of spirit they were of — in other words, whether they were genuine believers or not : and if, in the result, it should appear that they were, how much genuine religion they had, how much of the '• gold tried in the fire,*' and how much dross. See 1 Pet. i. 7« — It is obvious then, that in the scripture before us, it is supposed that real piety is an indispen sable pre-requisite to such a partaking of the sacra- ment, as is either acceptable to the Lord, or beneficial to the communicant. Chap. xi. S9. " For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body." — It is well known that this verse has been the occasion of much disquie- tude and distress, in the minds of many sincere, but weak believers. It is probable than an erroneous ap- prehension of it has kept away from the Lord's table, many who ought by all means to have approached it. Hence it is very important that the passage be riglitly understood. And for this purpose it should be ob- served, that the word krima, properly signifies judg- ment merely — though sometimes as the consequence 71 of thut coiidcm nation or adjudication to punishment: See Luke xxiii. 40^ and xxiv. 20 ; Rom. ill. 8, and xiii. S. Sometimes indeed the word seems to denote punishment of some kind or other, as in Gal. v. 10 ; Mat. xxiii. 14"; 1 Pet. iv. 17; Hev. xvii. 1. It is obvious however, that in neither of these passages does it signify primarily or properly, the punishment of hell, whicii is what we usually intend by the word damnation. Nor was this kind of punishment meant in the verse before us. Thus much at least is evident from the previous remarks. To these we may add, that the eating and drinking unworthily at the Lord's table, is not the unpardonable sin. What that is, see Mat. xii. 32. — The meaning of the passage then, must be this — * he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, i. e. without the requisite desir«s and fitness of character (see Mat. xxii. 8), eateth and drinketh judgment or condemnation to himself — i. e. he is herein, and for so doing, judged and condemned not only by his own conscience, but by the Judge of all the earth. His sin is great, although not ** the sin unto death.'' — Hence he may be forgiven, and will, if penitent. Chap. xii. 7. "But the manifestation of the Spir- it is given to every man to profit withal." — This scrip- ture has been sometimes brought along with several others, to prove that there is in every individual of mankind, some spark or portion of divine light — in opposition to the sentiment generally considered ortho- dox, viz. that we are by nature in a state of total spir- itual darkness. — But when thus used, it is evidently wrested from its primary and proper meaning. Right- ly to understand it. we must remember that the apos- n tie is treating of the gifts of the Spii-it. Between these and the graces or fruits of the Spirit, mentioned in Gal. v. 22, there is a very great difference — as great indeed as there is between disposition and abil- ity. The former, the gifts of the Spirit, are excellent, and as such ought to be earnestly coveted ; but the latter are more excellent than they, as the apostle ob- serves, verse 31, and proceeds particularly to illus- trate, in the article of charity or love, ch. xiii. — ad finera. Now that it was only of spiritual gifts that the apostle was here speaking, a bare attention to his argument must convince us. For observe, that as a proof or rather instance of the truth of what he had said in verse 7? he immediately says, '^ For to one is given by the Spirit the word of wisdom ; to another the word of knowledge by the same Spirit; to another faith (some miraculous or extraordinary faith, probably,) by the same Spirit ; to another the gifts of healing by the same Spirit ; to another the working of miracles ; to another prophecy ; to another discerning of spirits ; to another diverse kinds of tongues ; to another the interpretation of tongues." The above quotations show, moreover, that in verse 7? St. Paul referred not only to the gifts of the Spirit exclusively, but also, in a great measure, to such gifts as were bestow- ed in the apostolic age, and in primitive times ; for evidently some of the gifts above enumerated, were peculiar to that age and to those times. Chap. xiii. 13. *• And now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three ; but the greatest of these is chari- ty." — But how or why is charity or love, greater than faith and hope ? In several particulars, love has thfJ pre-eminence. That we may however, adh6ve as closely as possible to the reasoning of the apostle, we shall here mention only one — duration. The super- lative excellency of love consists in this — it '• never faileth." Do. verse 8 : " But whether there be proph- ecies, they shall fail ; whether there be tongues, they shall cease ; whether there be knowledge, it shall van- ish away," but ^' charity never faileth.^^ Faith shall be turned into sight, hope into enjoyment ; but love will last forever. Chap. xv. 24. " Then cometh the end, when he shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, event the Father ; when he shall have put down all rule and all authority and power." — For the explanation, and correct understanding of this very significant text, it should be observed and remembered, that the scrip- tures appear sometimes to distinguish between the kingdom of God and the kingdom of Christ. They are I)oth the same with respect to their general nature, — so they are with respect to their grand ultimate ob- ject, which is the universal extension and complete triumph of truth and righteousness. But yet with respect to administration and duration, there may be said to be a difference. The Son administers by a delegated and derived — the Father by an underived power. The kingdom of the Father is to be strictly and absolutely everlasting. The kingdom of the Son, 08 such, is to continue only until "he shall have sub- dued all enemies under his feet." (What that means, see the comment on the next verse.) He will then, deliver up his kingdom to God, even the Father. And this kingdom will ever afterwards be the Father's.— K V '7^ And it may be for the arrival of that great event, that grand consummation in the moral world, in part, that our Saviour directs us to pray in the petition, ^* thy kingdom come.'' The circumstance, however, that Christ will deliver up the mediatorial kingdom to God, even the Father, is perfectly consistent, both with his being properly a divine person, and witli his officiating forever and ever as the Father's vicegerent in admin- istration. The subordination of tlie Son, predicted in verse 28, may be simply official ; and official subor- dination may well consist with essential equality. — By the way, this text decidedly disproves universal- ism — I mean the limitarian scheme of that doctrine. For that scheme supposes (see Cliancey, and Win- chester, &c.), that some sinners will be found impeni- tent at the great day, and will, as such, be then ad- judged by Christ Jesus to the second death, which, they allow, will continue for ages of ages. Univer- salists contend, liowever, that wlien those as yet incorrigible sinners, shall have suffered the pains of such a second death, they will be wholly delivered from their gloomy prison and admitted to heaven ; or, if some of them sliould still continue so unreasonably obstinate as that they will need, and must endure still further discipline, yet that they will all eventu- ally be saved. But with such a scheme the text be- fore us is at eternal war : for by the end here men- tioned, must be meant the end of the world, the day of judgment. By the kingdom to be then delivered up, the mediatorial kingdom is unquestionablj' in- tended. If Christ then delivers up his kingdom, of course he will no longer act as Mediator ; and if sOy then obviously no sinners can ever be saved by him? 79. after the day of judgment. Can they be saved by any other? Let the scriptures answer-— " Neitlier is there salvation in any other : for there is none other name under heaven given among men whereby we must be saved." Acts iv. 12. CriAP. XV. '^5. "For He must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet." — How frequently and triumphantly have these words been brought for- ward in aid of the universalian cause ! but mani festly with no reason. The phrase ^ putting un der one's feet/ does not necessarily, nor even jiaturally, denote a cordial, willing s;ubjection. — When the captains of Israel, in obedience to (he command of Joshua, (x. 24?,) put their feet upon the necks of the five kings of Canaan, they did not thereby bring them into cordial subjection to his gov- ernment, or into cordial affection to his person. But mark the sense in which this phrase is used in otiier places of scripture. See, as a specimen, Ps. viii. 4—8 : "' What is man, that thou art mindful of him ? and the son of man, that thou visitest him ? For thou hast made him a little lower than the angels, and hast crowned him with glory and honor. Thou madesl him to have dominion over the works of thy hands : ihoii hast jJut all thinga under his feet /^ But certain- ly this plu'asc, as here used, cannot denote a cordial moral subjection. For the psalmist proceeds to men- tion, " all sheep and oxen, yea, the beasts of the field, the fowl of the air, the fish of the sea, and whatsoever passeth through tiie paths of the sea," as among the all things subjected to man. But as these animals are not moral agents, so of course they are not susceptible of moral subjection. All, therefore, the psalmist 76 meant was, that those animals were subjected to man's dominion^ so that they would be afraid of him, and acknowledge him as their lord and ruler. Similarly, but not otherwise, can it be said with truth, that all Christ's enemies shall be put under his feet. Chap. xv. 29. *^ Else what shall they do which are baptized for the dead, if the dead rise not at all ? why are they then baptized for the dead ?'" — Of this difficult text, three expositions have been proposed. Some have supposed that the phrase " for the dead,'' means for their dead things. It must be acknowl- edged, that the adjective or adjective pronoun town jfEKROW>r, may be in either the masculine or neuter gender. But yet what rational or definite idea, can be ^.ttached to the expression dead things, it is hard to conceive." — Some have supposed that St. Paul in this passage refers to a custom supposed to exist in his time, viz. of some being baptized (with water) in the place, stead, or room, and for the benefit of others, who were dead. But as it is questionable whether such a custom ever existed, and as the intrinsic folly of the custom itself is so glaring as to forbid even the supposition that it could well exist in the luminous age of the apostles, so that interpretation of the pas- sage which is built on the above hypothesis, must h% abandoned. It remains then, that we exhibit what appears to be the true meaning of the passage. As the words town nekrown may be in the masculine or feminine, or as we say in English, common gender, so in this verse they probably are. The preposition UPER, properly signifies, in the place or room of. Sec Rom. V. 8, 11 ; Cor. v. 14, 15 ; 1 Pet. ii. SI, and iii. 18, &c. — ^The word baptize is used in at least three 77 ji^Rscs ill the scriptures. Its first and most coramou reference is to that outward ordinance, or christian sacrament, called baptism. As understood in this sense, it signifies, to immerse or wash with water. — See Mat. iii. 16 ; Luke vii. 29 ; John iii. 23 ; Acts ii. 38, and X. 47, &c. Again — the word signifies sometimes, the opera- tions, the influences of the Holy Spirit, and as used in this acceptation, is called spiritual baptism. See, in illustration, Mat. iii. 11 ; Acts xi. 16. Once more — the word sometimes denotes sufferings ; commonly extreme sufl'eiings ; sufferings nigh unto death, as in Mark x. 38 ; Luke xii. 50. Now witli respect to the passage before us, it would make good sense if the word BAPTizoMENoi wcrc understood in either of the above mentioned senses. The first however, seems on the whole, preferable to either of the otlier two, chiefly because it is, in the New Testament, the most common sense of the term. The meaning of this pas- sage then, may be expressed in the following para- phrase : ^ Else what shall they do, who, in token of tiieir receiving the christian faith, are baptized in the room, or as tlie successors, of the dead — of those who have either died in the natural way, or suffered mar- tyrdom, if the dead rise not at all ; and why, if there be no resurrection and they do not firmly believe it, do they so readily step into the ranks of Christ's fal- len soldiers, thereby taking their places and exposing themselves to similar sufferings, and death ?' Surely if there were no resurrection, and no future state of rewards, they would be very foolish, in thus depriv- ing themselves of the pleasures of this life, and ex- posing themselvs to so many hardships, and even to a cruel death. II. CORINTHIANS. Chap. ii. i^ — 16. ^^Now thanks be unto Ood, which always causeth us to triumph in Christ, and maketh manifest the savour of his knowledge by us in every place. For we are unto God a sweet savour of Christ, in them that are are saved, and in them that perish. To the one we are the savour of death unUi death ; and to the other the savour of life unto life.'^ — The word thriambeuo, here rendered causeth to tnumph, occurs also in Col, ii. 15, where it is render- ed triumpliing over. The apostle may be understood as giving thanks to God, either because he had tri- umphed over his pharisaic pride and obstinate temper by his grace, and had made both himself and his fel- low apostles trophies of his grace, or rather as the English version imports, and as the two following verses most directly show, because he had made him and the other apostles triumphant as such — as officers in the kingdom of Christ. In these three verses, St. Paul is supposed to allude to a practice among the Romans, which was this : when their generals return- ed as conquerors from a successful campaign, they were accompanied by some distinguished persons whom they had taken as captives. When they en- tered the capital, the streets were paved with roses and | other things, of a sweet odour. Of their captives, some were pardoned, and some put to death. To the former those sweet smelling roses were reviving in- deed — they were a savour of life ending in life, of prolonged life. To the latter also, they were at first reviving ; but the revival was short — it wa« like the T9 revival before death, rather threatening than otherwise. In short, to them th«^e sUme sweet smelling roses were a savour of death unto death. The main spirit- ual instruction of the whole, appears to be this, viz. that the same odoriferous and blessed gospel, or the scheme of trutli therein taught, produces very differ- ent effects on different hearers — even as the beams of the sun do on wax and clay. Some the truth *' pre- pares unto glory'' — some it ripens for destruction. And iu either case, the effect produced will be accord- ing to the dispositions of the persons, and the manner in which they treat the messages of reconciliation. How important then the admonition, " Take heed how ye hear." Chap. ii. 17- " For we arc not as many which corrupt the word of God ; but as of sincerity, but as of God, in the sight of God speak we in Christ." — Kapeleuo, of which the participle is here used, and translated corrupt, literally means, to adulterate, as a dishonest tavern-keeper does his wines and other cost- ly liquors. The word is here used metaphorically, iu application to the word of God, and denotes adul- terating that word. Liquors may be adulterated two ways — by infusing into them 'poisonous ingredients, to give them a good color, &c. ; and by pouring into them such as, though not destructive to the lives or healths of people, weaken the liquors themselves — such as water, &c. How forcil)le the metaphor, and alas \ how applicable, as there is reason to fear, to too many in our own days also ! Can liquor be adulter- ated two ways? so and similarly may the gospel. It may be adulterated cither by the commixture of iklse philosophy, profane and vain babblings, botk which will eat as doth a canker — 2 Tim. ii. 16, 17 5 Col. ii. 8, &c. — or by the addition of harmless tradi- tions, useless ceremonies, &c. How careful should ministers and others be, that they do " not handle the word of God deceitfully" ! If, as is said, vast num- bers of people in Paris, once lost their lives in conse- quence of a merchant's selling them adulterated li- quors, ought not corrupt teachers to fear, lest a simi- lar, though more dreadful destruction (because that of the soul and an eternal one), should ensue on their adulteration of the lively oracles ! Chap. iii. 18. " But we all, with open face, be- holding as in a glass the glory of the Lord, are changed into the same image,'' &c. In the original, the word translated open, is a passive participle, sig- nifying exactly unveiled, uncovered. Hence we learn the precise meaning of this text. Moses had a veil over his face. Verse 13. A veil was also upon the minds of the Jews when their law was read. Verses 14, 15. But from true christians, as living under a so much more luminous dispensation, such veil is removed, so that they, with unveiled, with uncovered, open face, may behold, as in a glass, the Lord's glory. How valuable our privileges, how solemn our responsibility ! Chap. viii. 1. " Moreover, brethren, we do you to wit of the grace of God bestowed on the churches of Macedonia." — As the phrase " we do you to wit," is now obsolete and scarcely intelligible, it may be well, for the sake of common readers, to observe thai r tk the corresponding original word, signifies simply '* wg make known." The idea is, we make known to you the grace of God bestowed, &c. Chap. xii. 7. " And lest I slioiild be exalted above measure through the abundance of the revela- tions, there was given to me a thorn in the flesh, the messenger of satan to buifet me, lest I should be ex- alted above measure." — To such subjects as minister questions rather than godly edifying, the scripture cau- tions us not to give heed. 1 Tim. i. 4. Of this class appears to be that of the thorn in the fleshy here mentioned. But since it has given rise to considera- ble conversation, and frequent inquiries, it may be well to attend a little to it in this place. This thorn was, doubtless, some bodily infirmity, (for it was in his flesh) and probably an impediment in his speech ; for, 1. This is a nervous difficulty, or attributable to a weak and irritable state of the nervous system, as its proximate cause. And that St. Paul's bodily tem- perament was naturally of this description, seems probable from several circumstances I'ecorded in his life. See inter alia. Acts xxiii. 3. At any rate, whether it were naturally so or not, such super-natural revelations would be very apt to make it so, on ac- count of their overbearing influence on the whole ani»l mal frame, and hence to produce the eifect now sup- posed to have existed. 2. Certain passages in the writings of St. Paul, aeem to favor the above construction. See 2 Cor. x. 10, and xi. 6. But the scripture before us suggestfs for our consideration, another point less questionable, and' far more important, viz. the object for which thi9 8« ihovu was giveM. This was to humble him, to keep him from being exalted above measure. In short, al- though the passage before us had a primary reference to the apostle, and is strictly applicable to none but an inspired man, those revelations having been peculiar to such an one, yet as both it and the connected parts of the paragraph are of no private interpretation, they together, obviously furnish the following instructions : that pious men are sometimes spiritually enlarged, in their views and affections — that it is sometimes proper to speak of such enlargement, though with mod- esty, as surely the apostle does in the context — that there still remains in them fuel fcr pride and self-exal- tation — that hence they must have some judgments to bumble them — that these judgments, though sent in mercy and designed to accomplish the best purpose, are in themselves grievous to be borne — that Christ is the proper object of prayer — that it is lawful and pro- per to pray repeatedly for the same blessing — that al- though it may not be best on the Avhole for the present trials of christians to be removed, yet they shall have grace sufficient to bear them — and that with the assur- ance of this, as well as in view of the eventual good tendency of our trials themselves, we should even take pleasure in them, or as St. James says, ^'•' count it all joy, when we fall into divers temptations.'' Chap. xii. 16. "' — Nevertheless, being crafty, I caught you with guile." — Either this clause is to be understood as the objection of Paul's enemies, or as an interrogation like a similar clause in verse 18, respect- ing Titus, or the word dolo must be here used in a good sense. It is too evident to admit denial or td 88 require proof, that words, the same in the original ^ndi in our translation too, are used sometimes in a good sense, sometimes in a bad one. Of these, the words anger, emulation, tradition, &c. are specimens. Of these coustructions, however, the first, viz. that the words allude to an insinuation of PauFs enemies^, seems much the best. Surely nothing could be fur- ther from the apostle's design in this place, than to encourage pious frauds, falsely so called, or duplicity of any kind. mr GALATIANS. CiiAP. V. 4-. ^^ Christ is become of no eifect unto yoU;, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace." — Those who are but moderate- ly acquainted with the theological controversies of the present day, especially with those in which Calvinists and Armiuians (so called) are the contending parties, know very well that the subject of falling from grace, has, among others, occupied much attention and been the subject of much debate. To prove that true chris- tians may and sometimes do fall from grace, this pas- sage has, with others, been frequently adduced. To some this verse has probably appeared as sufficient of itself, to support that doctrine ; one reason of which, appears to be the phraseology here used. For who can doubt whether christians do not, or at least may not, fall from grace, when it is here expressly said that they had thus fallen ? Now in all controversies it is necessary that the precise point in debate should be explicitly stated, and fully understood. By falling from grace, as the phrase is used in this dispute, is meant a person's falling from an interest in the cove- nant of grace, and losing entirely all his religion. — As it has not been the authors design to engage in con- troversies further than should appear necessary for the execution of his main purpose, announced in the title page, he will not of course, at present, concern him- self with either the arguments for, or objections against, this doctrine. He would just observe however, that this scripture lias no manner of reference to that doc- trine as above explained, and that «ven if it had, it 8d could liaVe uo manuer of force to support the Armiu- ian sentiment respecting it. For observe — the text implies and teaclies, that none fall from grace except those who are justified by the law. The words are, '' whosoever of you are justified by the law, ye are fallen from grace."' Let the matter be expressed in a syllogism, and it will stand thus : ' None fall fromL grace except those who are justified by the law.' — But none are really justified by the law, for " by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight." Rom. iii. 20. Therefore, none really fall from grace. Or if we should understand the expression of being justified by the law, to mean, as in this place it does mean, seeking to be justified by the law, looking to the law for justification, why then the conclusion would be^ that none fall from grace except those who, like the Galatians, seek to be justified by the law, or by the deeds of the law. But it is hoped that in these days of light and knowledge, very few real christians are so foolish as the Galatians were in this respect. One thing is certain ; so far as they are real christians, they are dead to the law by the body of Christ — Rom. vii. 4, — and the law is dead to them, verse 6, i. e. as to any efficacy for their justification ; nor do they even seek to be justified by the deeds of the laAv. — But it is time to show what the true meaning of this passage is. If we candidly peruse the epistle throughout, we shall perceive that there was in the Galatians, or in many of them, an exceedingly strong propensity to seek justification before God from the law, or which is the same tiling, on the ground of their own works. See, particularly, Chaps, i. 6 ; ii. 21 ; iii. 1 — 4- ; iv- 10. 11. To bring them off from this Jegal ground, and to establish tliem on a purely evangelical one; was tlie main object of St. Paul in writing this epistle 5 as must be evident to every one who attentively reads it. And such was manifestly his object in the passage before us, and in the entire context. The meaning therefore, of this scripture, must be to the following effect, viz. ^ If you Galatians look to and depend on the law for justification, Christ is become of none ef- fect, or is of no use to you : you have in this case fal- len from and given up the gospel plan, which proposes to save you by mere sovereign grace.' Chap. vi. 4. '^ But let every man prove his own work, and then shall he have rejoicing in himself alone, and not in another.'' — As to the proper import of the verb dokimazeto (prove), see the criticism on , 1 Cor. xi. 28. The inquiry now before us is : what is intended by the last clause of the verse, " then shall he have rejoicing in himself alone, and not in another'^? The meaning evidently is, that then shall he have that joy which arises from his own sight of his good state, and not merely from the good opinion entertained of him by others. With respect to this affair, as well as many others, " it is a light thing to be judged of man or of man's judgment,'' for this is frequently er- roneous. But when we ourselves discern the evi- dences of our good state ; when we see them ourselves^ and our own eyes behold them, and not another's — this affords satisfaction. Thus " the good man is sat- isfied from himself J' Chap. vi. 17. "From henceforth let no man trouble me : for I bear in my body the marks of iii^ 87 Lf»rd Jesus." — " Let no man trouble me/' i. e. as is evident from tlie connexion and from the tenor of the whole epistle, with disputes and contentions about cir- cumcision and the other peculiarities of Judaism. For this request the apostle subjoins the following reason : *• for I bear in my body the marks of the Lord Jesus.'' What can be meant by those marks ? It is probable that he referred chiefly to the scars and wounds wliicli had been caused by the stripes he had received, and by those chains with which he had so frequently been bound and galled, in the service of the Lord Jesus. And as stigmata, the original word here used, denoted literally those marks or brands, which were sometimes imprinted by the ancients on their servants and soldiers, as permanent indications to whom they belonged, so the apostle might, by a beautiful allusion to this primary import of the word, have used it in this passage. He might have referred to his stigmata also, as tokens not only of his past sufferings in the cause of Christ, but also of his continued, indissolvable relation to him, notwith- standing all those sufferings. In these scars and wounds, the apostle gloried more triumphantly than did the Roman general in those scars and wounds which he had received in facing the enemies of his country. We hence learn, that the true believer glo- ries in tribulation undergone for Christ's sake, and that no species, nor degree of it, * neither death not life, nor angels, nor principalities nor powers, nor things present nor things to come, nor the height of prosperity nor the depth of adversity, nor any other creature, can separate him from the love of God Avhich is in Christ Jesus his Lord.' Surely a believer, and especially a minister of this deacription, ought not to be needlessly troubled or impeded, in his career to glory, and in his attempts to conduct poor sinners there, by " foolish questions and genealogies, and con- tentions and strivings about the law* which are un- profitable and vain.'^ m EPHESIANS. Chap. iv. 8. " Wherefore he saith, when he as- cended up on high, he led captivity captive, and gave gifts unto men." — This is a quotation from Ps. Ixviii. 18. and is supposed to contain an allusion to the prac- tice of ancient kings, ^vho, after victories, and on other great occasions, distributed gifts among their subjects. Thus, when the ark of the Lord of Hosts had been brought from Kirjath-jearim to the city of David, and an oblation had been made of burnt offerings and peace offerings, David " dealt among all the people, even among the whole multitude of Israel, as Avell to the women as the men, to every one a cake of bread, and a good piece of flesh, and a flagon of wine.'' S Sam. vi. 19. In like manner did Solomon, at the ded- ication of the temple. 1 Kings, viii. 65. But behold a greater than either Solomon or David is here. — Greater also is his munificence, for it includes spiritual blessings in heavenly things, in Christ Jesus. For after he had " spoiled principalities and powers, and made a show of them openly," and in testimony of complete triumph, had led captivity captive, and as- cended up on high, he also dispersed gifts among his subjects. " And he gave some apostles, (i. e. some to be apostles) some to be prophets, some to be evangelists, and some to be pastors, and some to be teachers," and all for most important purposes, even " for the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ." Chap. iv. 30. ^* And grieve not the Holy Spirit M 90 of Grodf whereby ye are sealed unto the day of re- demption." — The sealing of the Spirit here mention- ed, seems to be a metaphor, taken from a practice of merchants, viz. putting a certain mark, stamp, or seal on their goods, whereby they might be known to be theirs. Or the phrase may refer, perhaps more proba- bly, to the ancient practice of setting a seal or mark on the bodies of soldiers and servants, especially on their foreheads and hands — a fact which, by the ivay, may assist in illustrating the true meaning of Ezek. ix. 4. and Rev. vii. 3. The day of redemption must here mean the day of the general resurrection and final judgment. See a similar phrase used in Hom. viii. 33. The passage then, rightly understood, not only shows, that God's servants have his peculiar distinguishing mark or seal upon them, which is his own moral image, but also appears strongly in point to support the doctrine of their final perseverance and eternal happiness. Chap. vi. 19. *• And for me, that utterance may be given unto me, that I may open my mouth boldly, to make known the mystery of the gospel." — Many scriptural words have been and still are mis-used, and made to convey such meanings as, to say the least, are quite foreign to their original import. The remark is applicable, in a degree, to the terms heresy, schism, tradition, &c. and still more so to the one now before us. The word mystery (in the Greek Musterion) has been and still is used by the papists? to denote the sacraments of the New Testament, es- pecially that of the Euchajist. By protestants, or by many of them, it has been understood and used to •91 denote tiomcfhing incomprehensible by the Iiumau niiud. Thus^ the co-existence of three persons in one God, and of two natures iu the person of Jesng Christ, tliey have declared to be mysterious — meaning thereby, that by the mind of man they cannot be fully comprehended. But the Greek word musterion, properly signifies neither of tiiese, but something liid^ den, concealed in opposition to its being revealed. For proof of this we need only recur to the etymolo- gy of the word itself, and to the connexion and sense in which it is almost invariably used in the New Testament : 1. Its etymology. Miisterion is derived either from the Greek verb muein, to shut up, to conceal,— i- or from the Hebrew noun mistar, a thing hidden? concealed, which is from the verb satau, to hide, conceal. The etymological import of the word there- fore, is not something incomprehensible, but something as yet concealed — not revealed. And that such is in fact its proper meaning, is yet further evident, 2. From the connexion and sense in which the word is almost invariably used in the New Testament. See, among numerous others, the following passages. Mat. xiii. 11 : "Unto you it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven." But how could the disciples know those mysteries, if they were in- comprehensible, or unintelligible ? Rom. xvi. 25, §6 : " — according to the revelation of the mystery, which was kept secret since the world began, but now is made manifest, and by the scriptures of the prophets, according to the commandment of the everlasting God, made knoicn to all nations for the obedience of faith." Remarks oa the sense in which the word mysterv is . 9& here used, are unnecessary. The passage explains itself, 1 Cor. xv. 5i : " Behold I shew you a mys- tery." What mystery ? The apostle proceeds in the three succeeding verses, to tell us what it is. It is in short, the mystery of the general resurrection, and of that glorious transformation, which the bodies of the «aints are then to undergo. This subject had been kept concealed from the pagan Gentiles. The pre- sumptive evidence in favor of it, from the light of na- ture, tiieir only guide, was too weak, they thought, to render the doctrine credible. Hence the Greeks not only disbelieved, but derided it. Acts xvii. 33. To them this doctrine had been a mystery ; i. e. it had not been revealed to them ; but having been shewed — having been revealed to them by the apostle, it was a mystery to them no longer. Certainly it was not to such of them as believed in the apostle's inspiration, and credited his testimony. Once more — Col. i. 2d, S6 : " — the word of God ; even the mystery which hath been hid from ages and from generations, but now is made manifest to his saints.'^ I shall quote at pres- ent no more passages, but would merely advise the reader, who is not yet satisfied with the interpretation ahove given, and still adheres to the too prevailing modern one, to attend carefully to the following places, which are, I believe, all the rest, where the word mys- tery occurs, i. e. in the New Testament, viz : 2 Thess. ii. 7 ; 1 Tim. iii. 9, and iii. 16 ; Eph. i. 9, iii. 3 — 9, V. 32, and vi. 19; Rom- xi. 2o ; 1 Cor. ii. 6, iv. 1, xiii. 2, and xiv. 2 ; Col. ii. 2, andiv. 3 ; Mark iv. 11^ with Luke viii. 10; Rev. i. 20, x. 7, and xvii. 5, He will perceive that in almost all the above texts, mus- terion denotes not something incomprehensible or un- 98 mtelligible ; but somcthiDg which had been secret, but is now revealed, declared in the word of God, and whicli may of course, be known and understood. The practical use to be made of all that has been said on tiiis article, is, that we should be very careful to use scriptural words in their primitive and proper sense. To the neglect of this, or to the contrary practice is to be attributed, in some measure, a great part of those doctrinal and practical errors which have so much abounded in Christendom. 94 PHILIPPIANS. Chap. i. 10. " That ye may approve things that are excellent ;" or^ ^ that ye may try the things that diifer/ as the clause may be rendered. — These words, therefore, may be understood as expressing the apos- tle's wish and petition, not merely that the Philippian christians might cordially approve of those things vv^hich were really excelleut, but also that their intel- lectual faculties might be exercised in discriminating truth from error ; that thus they might discover and determine what things were really excellent, and thus worthy of approbation. How indispensable then the duty, as well as from other considerations, how ur- gent the necessity of examining, of searching the scriptures for ourselves ! for if we neglect this duty, if we rest satisfied with a superficial acquaintance with their contents, and above all, if we depend on the mere opinions of other men, — we may indeed be ever learning, after a sort, but shall be apt " never to Gome to the knowledge of the truth.*' Chap. i. S3. " For I am in a strait betwixt two, having a desire to depart and to be with Christ, which is far better.'' — This is to be classed among the nu- merous scriptures ■ which exhibit the doctrine of a separate intermediate state : for it expresses the con- viction of an inspired apostle, that immediately on his departure from this world, he should be with Christ. Thus to be, Paul says, is far betler than to remain here, which could not be true, otherwise than on the supposition that he would be in a state of both conscious and happy existence. In abort, the text before us teaches at once tlie doctrines, both of a separate state, and of the immediate happiness of christians at death. Chap. ii. 6, 7f ^- " ^'^ho, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God ; yet made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the like- ness of men ; and being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross." — These verses, espe- cially the 6th and 7th, notwithstanding the Socinian construction of them, establish these two positions — that Christ pre-existed, and that, in his pre-existent state, he was not a proper man, but possessed another, a higher, even a divine nature. That both these sen- timents are simultaneously expressed, a mere atten- tion to the verses must evince. CiiAP. iii. 2. ^' Beware of the concision." — The word KATATOMEEN, rendered concision, and which may with equal propriety l)e rendered excision, seems in this place to denote those Judaizing teachers, who, in the apostolic age, infested not only the Philippian church, but many other churches also ; and who, as this characteristic word imports, cut off, or cut down. Indeed the term represents both their works and. their destiny : for by their insisting so much on the neces- sity of circumcision to salvation. Acts xv. 1. and by their incessant commixture of Judaism with christiani' ty, they cut down, as it were, the fundamental pillars of the latter, and cut oiF or frustrated the hopes of in* 96 dividual believers; since * other foundation could no man lay than that which was laid/ which was Je- sus Christ. 1 Cor. iii. 11. The word also may have pointed to their destiny, for they, with multitudes of others of their nation, were soon to be cut oif from the earth, in the approaching destruction of Jerusa- lem, and awful desolation of Judea. Chap. iii. 11. " If by any means I might attain unto the resurrection of the dead." — This cannot mean the literal and general resurrection. For to the resurrection here spoken of, St. Paul represents it as difficult to attain : and from the following verses it appears, that whether he should eventually attain to it or not, would depend on his own faithfulness or unfaithfulness. But in the literal resurrection, all men will participate, whether faithful or unfaithful — whether good or bad ; '^ for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice^ and shall come forth." John v. 28, 29. By the res- urrection of the dead, therefore, St. Paul must have meant, the receiving of that glorious and spiritual body, mentioned in verse 21 ; and there represented as opposed to his present vile body. Or to express it otherwise, in John v. 29 ; the Lord Jesus speaks of the ^^ resurrection of life," and of " the resurrection of damnation." Now it is the first of these resurrections that the apostle refers to m the words before us, even the resurrection unto eternal life. Such was the res- urrection that the apostle here represents himself as so diligently seeking. Chap. iii. 20. " For our conversation is in heaven." 97 — The word canversation, whether understood in its vulgar sense, as meaning familiar discourse, or on a larger scale, as denoting intercourse, familiarity, doeg not convey the whole meaning of its correspondent original term. This is politeuma, which means citi- zenship — sometimes also, the body, community, socie- ty of which one is a citizen. The design of the apos- tle, therefore, in this passage, appears to have been to assert not only the practice, but also the hirih and heavenly relation of himself and his Philippian breth- ren, and consequently of all true christians. 17 m COLOSSIANS. Chap. ii. 8. " Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ." — The word translated spoil, is compound, being derived from sula, (spoils), and ago, to lead away, or carry oft*. Primarily, it relates to, and is descriptive of, the conduct of a victorious enemy, who, having subdued his antagonist, dispossesses him of his treasures and carries them off as spoils from the field of battle. How forcibly expressive then is it, of that complete subjection and moral ruin, to wiiich the apostle considered the Colossians as exposed from philosophy. The philosophia, hov/ever, which the apostle here mentions, cannot intend true and genuine philosophy, for it would be very absurd to pretend that this can ever be hostile, or in any way injurious, to Christianity. Neither does Christianity forbid, or discourage our attention to the sciences in general, but is friendly to them all, and, in particular, not only allows, but requires the diligent use and improvement of all our mental powers in the investigation of truth. 1 Thess. V. 2i. And what Christianity requires, that she has actually effected, wherever, and just so far as, her genuine influence has prevailed. For it is too no- torious to be denied, that almost all the literature and science which have been in the world since the com- mencement of the christian era, have been in christian countries, and have been owing no doubt, to the fos- tering influence of Christianity itself. But, by philos- ophy in this passage, the apostle iateads what may be &9 . called philosopbism — false philosophy, vain and de- ceitful, as in this same versi: he describes it ; or " sci- ence falsely so called," as in 1 Tim. vi. SO, In a word, tiie object of St. Paul in this verse is, to warn us against l)cing " corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ,'' by infidel philosophy on the one hand, or by Jewish, or any other human traditions and in- ventions, on the other. How seasonable, how impor- tant the warning, even in our days. " He that hath an ear let him hear what the Spirit here saith to the churches.'*' Chap. ii. 18. " Let no man beguile you of your reward in a voluntary humility and worshipping of angels, intruding into those things which he hath not seen, vainly pulled up by his fleshly mind." — The only particular in this verse which seems to require illustration is, ^' worshipping of angels." AVhat is in- tended by such worship ? To understand this subject correctly, it should be remembered, that the primitive church, although so highly favored witli divine inspira- tion and apostolic instruction, soon became infested and corrupted witii pagan philosophy and Jewish tra- ditions. And perhaps no particular church was more so than the Colossian. See cliap. ii. verses 8, 16, &c. This worshipping of angels originated among the pagans. In their worship they made use of angels, or of supposed angels, as mediators between the Deity and themselves. At first, it seems, they regarded them in this light only, i. e. as mediators, and inter- cessors. In process of time, however, as might have been expected, these angels became more directly the bjects of religious adoration themselves. Indeed the 100 process in this matter among the Gentiles, appears to have been much the same as it was afterwards in the Roman church, with respect to the images of departed saints. Accordingly, in ecclesiastical history, image- worship itself, as practised in that church, is consid- ered as having come from the Gentiles. See Milner, vol. 3, p. 157. — These remarks may serve to prepare the way for our understanding what is here meant by the worshipping of angels. Certain persons, it seems, in the church at Colosse, were still so much under the influence of their old pagan philosophy and supersti- tion, that they were for introducing angels into their worship ; i. e. for introducing angels as helps in di- vine worship — as mediators, pretending it was too much, too great arrogance for such mean creatures as men were, to attempt to worship the Majesty of heav- en without their mediation. There was an appear- ance of humility in all this ; but it was nothing more. It was a mere voluntary humility — one entirely of their own invention and choice — such an humility as Jehovah never required, and would never approve of ; yea, it was no true humility. It deserved a far different name. It was in reality pride, rank pride, as it led the subjects of it to " exercise themselves in great matters, and in things too high for them" — to pry presumptuously into the invisible world, and to attempt to understand and teach such things respect- ing angels as are no where revealed. Thus they in- truded into those things which they had not seen, and could not see, nor know, and became, of course, vain, ly puffed up by their fleshly minds. Besides — by in- troducing the worship of angels, they would rob the Redeemer of his appropriate glory, for he is the one 101 and the only mediator between God and men. 1 Tim. ii. 5. No wonder then that the apostle should give such a caution against the worshipping of angels. Chap. iii. 14. " And above all these things put on charity, which is the bond of perfectness." — It is probahlc that most readers consider the word above, as here denoting preference, as if Paul had said, * put on charity as preferable to all the other virtues,' men- tioned in verse IS. Indeed, charify or love, must be allowed to have the pre-eminence over all the other characteristics of the true believer. See 1 Cor. xii. 3t, and ch. xiii. throughout. It does not, however, appear to have been the design of this passage to re- cognize such pre-eminence. The passage is suppos- ed to be figurative, and to refer to the manner in which the ancients, and especially the ancient soldiers, were clothed. They used to have a girdle tied around and over their other garments. That girdle served as a bond or ligament, to keep their other garments tight and close together. To a similar tendency and opera- tion of charity, the apostle here refers. It would prove as a *^ bond of perfectness," or a perfect bond, to keep together and adjust all the other graces and gifts of the christian. 102 I. THESSALONIANS. Chap. ii. I7. '^But we, brethren, being takeu from you for a short time in presence, not in heart, endeavored the more abundantly to see your face with great desire." — The apostle here refers to the event related in Acts xvii. 10. In consequence of the in- surrection, menaces, and violence of the Jews, the brethren were obliged to send away himself and Silas by night, from Thessalonica to Berea. And his de- sign in the first part of this verse was, to relate not only the fact of his having been then separated from tliera, but also the manner of such separation, i. e. as it respect- ed his own feelings. It was, in short, as the original imports, like that of children suddenly and violently torn from their affectionate parents, or otherwise de- prived of them, and thus made orphans. — How pecul- iar, how tender, and strong, are the feelings of pious ministers towards their people ! Chap. iii. 13. "To the end he may establish your hearts unblaraeable in holiness before God, even our Father, at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ with all his saints." The word saints, as commonly used, denotes the "redeemed from among men." It is well knoAvn, however, by every one acquainted with the original, that the word agioi, translated saints, is generic, and with equal propriety applicable to any intelligent beings possessing sanctity of character. It is applied to God the Father, 1 Pet. i. 15 ; to Jesus Christ, Mark i. S4; to the Holy Spirit, Mat. i. 18; to the 108 good angels, Luke ix. 20 ; to the Old Testament prophets, Luke i. 70 ; to both the prophets and apostles and to believers generally, as members of the church militant, Acts ix. 13, 41. In fine, the word when used without a noun and with the article, «s in this passage, signifies the holy ones. If now the inquiry be, what class of holy beings are intended by this phrase in the verse before us, — the answer is, probably the angels : for it sliould be remembered that in this place the apostle is speaking of the second coming of Jesus Clirist — of his coming to judge the world. Now we are elsewhere expressly told» that when he shall come for this purpose, the angels shall descend with and attend liira. See Mat. xxv. ^1 ; a Thess. i. 7- Again, it will be naturally impossible for the redeemed saints to attend their Saviour in that, his descent, anil that too in their per- fect man, consisting of both body and soul. Much less will all of them be able thus to attend him on that great occasion ; because all their bodies (tliose only of Enoch and Elijah excepted) will then be in their graves. — For the Lord Jesus will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel and the trump of God, before even the dead in Christ sliall arise Chap. iv. 16. 104 II. THESSALONIANS. Chap. ii. 7, 8. "For the mystery of iniquity doth already work : only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way. And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall con- sume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming." — By the mystery of iniquity, or of lawlessness, is to be understood, generally, antichristianism, as even in the apostolic age beginning to appear — in the ambitious domineer- ing spirit of some ministers, as well as in the factious schismatical spirit of many professors, — and also, in all those corruptions of doctrine — in all that idolatrous worship — and in all those corporeal severities and mortifications which were occasioned by such a spirit. The phrase " he who now letteth,'' (or hindereth, withstandeth) denotes the imperial Roman power or civil government, which then, from motives of policy, operated as a check on ecclesiastical predominance and corruptions, and would thus act, so long as the then existing administration should continue. But afterwards, after the then existing impediment should have been removed, the Wicked or lawless one, i. e. the Papacy, with all its characteristic deformity, should appear : which accordingly vvas the case, A. D. 606. But this antichristian power was to " endure but for awhile. '^ The apostle expressly predicts his over- throw, and the means by which it should be accom- plished. " Whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the bright- ness of his coming," The consumption and dftr i05 struetion here predicted, must be principally of the moral kind. This appears, vvhetiier we consider the means with which they sliould be accomplished, viz. tlie spirit of the Lord^s mouth, and the brightness of his coming, i. e. generally, the influences of his Spir- it accompanying the bright display of his truth, es- pecially in the faithful preaching of it, (means evi, dently suited to accomplish no destruction but that of sin) — or the fact, that the Papists, as a body of peo- ple, have not yet been literally destroyed, although this awful prophecy has been fulfilling against them 300 years, but are still very numerous, their numbers being supposed to amount to 140,000,000. The de- struction of this antichristian power began at the time of the great Reformation, A. D. 15t7 — has been going on ever since, and will be completed at the close of the 1S60 years. Chap. ii. 11, 12. " And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion that they should believe a lie ; that they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness." — The 11th verse, if literally interpreted, would cer- tainly exhibit some agency of God in sin ; but, doubt- less, such an one as neither reflects on His immaculate purity on the one hand, nor abridges human liberty on the other. But what is to be understood by v. IS, " that they all might be damned who believed not the truth," &c. ? As to the import of the word damned, see the criticism on 1 Cor. xii. 29. The final clause of this verse illustrates the true cause of the condemnation and ruin of sinners. This is, in short, not the divine decree of reprobation, but their own wicked choice. It is their being " pleased with unrighteousness." 106 I. TIMOTHY. CAap. ii. 4. ^^ Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth." — As this text has been much used in the universalian con- troversy, and is much relied on by the advocates for the final salvation and happiness of all mankind, it has become, for this reason, very important to investi- gate its true meaning. To this end let it be observed, 1. The passage may express merely God's willing- ness that all men should be saved. Indeed, although the verb thelo sometimes expresses wish, desire, yet according to Schrevelius' Lexicon, mere ivillingness is its primary signification. Now in this sense Jeho- vah, undoubtedly, willeth that all men should be sav- ed. For he saith, " Have I any pleasure at all that the wicked should die, — and not that he should return from his ways and live ?" Far from this. " As I live, saith the Lord God, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but tliat the wicked turn from his way and live" — Ezek. xviii. S3, and xxxiii. 11. — i. e. such is the benevolence of the blessed God, that it is mor-^ ally impossible He should be pleased with the death or misery of any human being, in itself considered. Human happiness and misery being considered ab- stractly, the former would, in his mind, be infinitely preferable to the latter. Hence then, and in this ^ense, He may be said to will the salvation of all men- But all this does not imply that all men will, in fact, be saved. If from the mere goodness of God, and his willingness that all should be happy, we may con- clude that all will in fact be saved eternally, then 107 from the same premises we may conclude against u«. deniable matter of fact, viz. the existence of any such things as sin and misery in the present world. For Ihe principle of the reasoning is in both cases the same. If, because the Lord is good, lie will necessarily save all men from eternal misery, then for the same reason, one would think, would He save them from temporal misery also, or prevent their enduring it, which we know lie does not. Or to state the matter a little dif- ferently, and perliaps more appropriately : if from the mere willingness of God, that all men should be holy and happy in tiie future world, we may conclude that all will be there holy and happy ; then from his willingness that they all should be holy and happy in this world also, we might conclude that they all would, while here, be both holy and happy. The truth is, that in both cases the conclusion does by no means result from the premises. Though the Lord be willing that all sinners should be saved, yet none of them are, naturally, willing to be saved, i. e. in his own way. And to say that this natural unwillingness will ever be overcome, or in any way removed, from all sinners, is to beg the question. And if it could be proved that the phrase, " who will have all men to he saved," means that God actually wishes, desires, the salvation of all men, and hence it should be con- cluded that all men will hereafter, and eventually, he holy and happy, — the inquiry is, why then are they not all holy and happy in this world, for is not the latter an obJl;ct of divine desire, equally and in the same sense with the other? But, 2. In this verse the apostle may refer to God's pre- cpp^.?ve will or command. And in this sense also, it 108 is undoubtedly his will that all should be saved : For not only doth He direct that his gospel should be preached to every creature, but " now comraandeth all men every where to repent.'^ Acts xvii. 31. And says St. John, '^ This is his commandment, that we should believe on the name of His son Jesus Christ/' But whatever may be the import of the word willj (which is the key to the whole passage,) it is obvious that the word itself extends alike to both clauses of the verse. Let us read it again : '^^ Who will have all men to be saved and to come unto the knowledge of the truih.'' In the same sense therefore, in which God willeth all men to be saved, doth He will them to come to the knowledge of the truth. Now the lat- ter clause may be interpreted in perfect consistency with either, and with both of the above mentioned con- structions. For that God is willing that all men should come to the knowledge of the truth, appears from his direction to his ministers to preach his gospel to every creature. Mark xvi. 1;^. And that He command- eth all in christian lands to come to this knowledge, will not be denied by such as have properly read their bibles, and believe that they are His word. The hea- then also, have a law, (Rom. ii. 14.) and are thereby required to attend to truth and duty, so far as they can be learned from the light of nature, and are inex- cusable because they do not. Ch. i. 20. But to say that the Lord hath purposed, hath decreed, that all should come to the knowledge of the truth, is saying far too much, if, as Isaiah teaches, ch. i. 27, what the Lord of hosts hath purposed none can disannul ; for it is notorious, that all have not yet come to the knowl. edge of the truth, nor ever will in this world. Oo the 109 whole, it seems there is no rational or right way, of interpreting this passage, but what is contained in the one or the other of the above constructions. Chap. ii. 14,15. " And Adam was not deceived ; but the woman, being deceived, was in the transgres- sion. Motwithstanding she shall be saved in child- bearing, if they continue in faith, and charity, and ho- liness, witli sobriety/'' — But is there not decisive proof from Cxen. iii. 0, that Adam was deceived, and was a transgressor in the affair of the forbidden fruit, and as really so as Eve ? Paul's meaning is, that Adam was not first deceived. And the truth of this appears from Moses' account of the temptation. It thence appears that the woman was first in both the deception and the transgression. Yea, in a certain sense, it may be said that Adam was not deceived by the serpent at all, for from the Mosaic narrative it ap- pears that his transgression was in direct compliance, not with the temptation of the devil, but with the soli- citations of the woman. But what can be the meaninis of verse 15. That the child-bearing, there mentioned? is not to be understood literally, is at least probable from the immediately subjoined condition of her being thus saved, viz. her continuance in faith, and charity, and holiness, &c. But that impious and infamous women are conducted through the pains of the literal parturi- tion as safely, and perhaps as frequently, as those of the most exemplary virtue, is too evident to admit de- nial. The word saved, here seems to denote spiritual salvation ; and the word child-bearing, the "child born" — the seed of the woman— the Messiah. And the meanbig of the apostle appears to have been this : 11© ^.Though the woman was first deceived, and in the transgression, yet her condition with respect to par- don and eternal happiness, is by no means desperate : for she may be, yea, she certainly shall be, saved in and through that glorious Redeemer, who was to be (and has been) born of her, provided only she obeys Him in the exercise of faith, and charity, and holiness? with sobriety.' Chap. iv. 1 — 4. " Now the Spirit speaketh ex pressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doc- trines of devils ; speaking lies in hypocrisy ; having their conscience seared with a hot iron ; forbidding to marry ; and commanding to abstain from meats, which Grod hath created to be received with thanks- sivins: of them which believe and know the truth." — The Protestants appear to be correct in their applica- tion of this paragraph of scripture to the Papists, chiefly because the characteristics herein enumerated have been so peculiarly exhibited by them. Tlie DiijASKALiAis DAiMONiowN, translated " doctrines of devils," signify exactly, doctrines of demons. But here arises the inquiry, whether we are by this ex- pression to understand doctrines taught by demons, or y such '* mighty signs and wonders'' as were exhibited by the prophets and apostles in proof of tlieir extraordinary commission. As the christian ministry is, in reference to the subjects it treats of, and its eternal consequences, by far the most important office ever committed to man ; and as, from its peculiar nature, it is obvious that its duties caa never be performed with any good degree of fidelity, only where the heart is in the work, two things are manifestly necessary to constitute any proper qualifi- cation for it, viz. a desire for the work, and an abili- ty (or it. See 1 Tim. iii. 1 — S. Of the first of these, the individual himself must be the judge; of the last, others, and those too qualified to judge on this most interesting subject. Chap. v. 12. " For when for the time ye ought to be teachers, ye have need that one teach you again which be the first principles of the oracles of God ; and are become such as have need of milk, and not of strong meat." — The connexion of this passage, with the preceding part of the chapter, must be carefully remembered. The chapter is introduced with a char- acteristical description of Melchizedek. In such de- scription, the apostlo proceeds with equal pleasure to liimself and advantage to the reader, until he comes R to the 11th verse. But there his ardor cools, and be very abruptly aud reluctantly leaves, for the present? Ms subject, not because it was exhausted, for he had many things yet to say upon it ; but on account of the in- attention and indifference of his readers. What a ca- lamity it is when such lively preachers have to preach to such stupid hearers ! JKutto the passage itself : " When for the time,'' i. e. on account of, or in respect to, the time. The time, here mentioned, may denote the then present peculiar lime, as a time of persecution ; when, of course, christian instruction, support and con- solation, would be peculiarly needed by believers, or rather as is most probable, the time and singularly fa- vorable opportunities these Hebrews had enjoyed for growth in knowledge, experience, &c. '' Ye ought to be teachers," not officially as a body, but in the sense intended in Col. iii. 16. — " Ye have need that one teach you again which be the first principles of the oracles of God." How forgetful then had these Hebrews been ; and what a glass is here for many modern heai'ers to see themselves in ! '^ First principles," &c. — Chris- tianity is a science, consisting of some simple and ele- mentary truths; and of others more abstruse, less easily intelligible, called elsewhere " the deep things of God." — " And are become such as have need of milk^ and not of strong meat." As on this clause there has been much conversation, considerable debate, and after all, quite a diversity of opinion : it seems necessary to attend a little to it, to ascertain, if possible, its true meaning. And to do this most effectually, it would be very well for us, if, instead of bewildering our- selves in speculation, we would only attend to the simple metaphor, here used, by the apostle, viz. "milk and strong; meat." Milk is something easily, aud quickly digested — strong meat not so easily nor so readily. Hence, as says the apostle, " every one tiiat useth milk, is a babe, hut strong meat, be- longcth to them that are of full age ;'' i. e. milk is proper for babes, strong meat for persons of adult age ; wltose digestive organs have been strengthened and improved I)y long exercise. Now keeping this meta- phor in mind, Ave may instantly perceive that, what the apostle primarily intended by " strong meat," was not so much those doctrines which are offensive to the natural heart, as those which are hard to be under- stood — hard to be digested by the mind : such doc- trines, indeed, as he had just been speaking of, those relating to the person, character and official work of Melchizedek. The doctrines, therefore, of total de- pravity, of eternal election, &c. cannot come under the appellation of strong meat, or to be sure, no further, nor othervi^lse, than as they are hard to be understood. Chap. vii. 1. " For this Melchizedek, king of Sa_ km, priest of the most high God," &c. — The writer's object in the present work, requires merely, that he should show, if possible, who, and what this Melchize- dek was. Now on this difficult subject, there are but two opinions : the one that he was a mere man, con- temporary witli Abraham — the other tiiat he was Christ himself. In support of the opinion that he was Christ, it is alleged, 1. That he was without father, without mother, v/ithout descent, having neither beginning of days nor end of life. These characteristics, it is supposed, are predicable of Jesus Christ only, or at least of him with 1^ unspeftkably more propriety, than of any other per, ison. But if we understand them literally, tlie same difficulty will attend their api>iication to the man Christ Jesus, as would attend their application to any other person. The person who brought i'orth bread and wine, and blessed Abraham, is evidently spoken of as a man. If, therefore, Christ were that person, Christ must here be referred to in his human nature only. Bat surely, as man, Clirist was not without mother, nor without descent, nor without beginning of days, nor witiiout end of life. If these expressions should not be understood, literally, but only as teach- ing, generally, that Melchizedek's genealogy could not be traced ; why then the difficulty, not only continues, but becomes greater than before, for Christ's genealogy is distinctly traced by both Matthew and Luke. But 2. Melchizedek was greater than Abraham — hence it is inferred, that he must have been the Christ. But this circumstance alone, does not prove that he was Christ. Those who think it does, must, of course, proceed on the supposition, that tliere was not, and could not be any mortal man on earth, in Abraham's time, greater than he. But this certainly is mere sup- position. The greatness, attributed to Melchizedek in the context, was not so much personal as official ; it arose, in short, chiefly from his being king in Salera^ and priest of the most high God. Now in the light of scripture, no office is so great and so honorable as the latter of these ; and surely, in reference to consequen- ces, both here and hereafter, none is so important. Now Melchizedek was such a priest, but Abraham was not. There is, therefore, no necessity of suppos- ing that Christ is the person here meaut, merely be- 123 cause this person was superior to Abraham ; for as king in Salem, and priest of tlie most high God, Melchize- dekmust have been superior to Abraham, even on sup- position that he was a mere man. 3. It is said of Melchizedek, verse 8, " he liveth,'' yea, in verse 24, that "he continueth forever." But all this may mean nothing more than that he liveth in his antitype, and tliat his priesthood continueth, just as the martyrs are said (Rev. xx. 4,) to revive and reign in their successors. And as to the expression, verse 13, ** he of whom these things are spoken, per- taineth to another tribe ;'' it is manifest, that what the apostle meant, hereby, was not to tell us who he was, but to illustrate the peculiar origin and nature of his priesthood. — See the context. That this Melchizedek was not Christ, appears, because he is said, verse 3, to be " made like unto the ion of God." He could not then have been the son of God himself. Again, in verses 15, 16, 17? we read »* after the similitude of Melchizedek, there ariseth an- other priest, (i. e. another, than either an Aaronie priest, or the literal Melchizedek) who is made, not after the law of a carnal commandment, but after the power of an endless life. For He testifieth, thou art a priest forever, after the order of Melchize- dek." By the other priest, Christ, undoubtedly, is in- tended. Christ then, is here said, to be after the si- militudey after the order of Melchizedek. He could not, therefore, be Melchizedek himself. But who he was, it is impossible for us to tell. The Jews, and some christian authors, suppose he was Shem, one of the sons of Noah. But Shem, surely, could not have been said to be without father, without mother, with- 128 ©ut descent ; having neither beginning of days nor end of life. Ue had a father and a mother, his genealogy had been distinctly traced, and was well known : and not only had he a beginning of days and an end of life, but it was known when and where he was born, and when he died. But although we cannot know ■who exactly Melchizedek was, otherwise than that he was some great and good man, contemporary with Abraham, we may know what he m as. Thojigh he was not the Christ, he was an illustrious type of Christ. As such, the apostle represents him in several particulars. At present we shall select only two, be- cause these are the most prominent, and may compre- hend all others. Melchizedek, then, was a pre-emi- nent type of Christ, as king and as priest. 1. As king. He was king in, or of, Salem, i. e. king of peace, for such is the import of the Hebrew word. Further — he was, as his characteristic name imports, king of righteousness, or a righteous king. In this respect, what an impressive type was he of Him who is set as king on the holy hill of Zion, (Ps. ii. 6,) who is emphatically the " prince of peace," (Isa.; ix. 6,) and reigns in righteousness, Ch. xxxii. 1. j^ 2. As priest. He was priest of the most high God, Eminently so was our Lord, the high priest of our profession. — Melchizedek had no predecessor in office. In this respect he was without descent. And in this respect how strikingly did he typify Him ^' w hose de- scent was not counted from them,*' verse 6, i. e. from the sons of Levi ; but who " pertained to another tribe, of which Moses spake nothing concerning priesthood." Verse 14. Once more — As Melchizedek had no predecessor, so he had no successor, otherwise than in •12J7' hifl antitype. Neither has Christ any successor : "Be- cause he continueth forever, lie hath an unchangea- ble priesthoot'/' or a priesthood which doth not pas3 away. He is "' consecrated forevennore." For "the Lord hath sworn, and will not repent, thou art a priest forever after the order of Melchizedek." Ps. ex. 4*. Let us not " exercise ourselves in things too high for us," hut let it be our main desire and endeavor, to se- cure an interest in the true Melchizedek, for "^ he is able also to save them to the uttermost, that come unt<» God by him, seeing he ever liveth to make intercession for them." Chap. viii. 8 — 12. " For finding fault with them, he saith, behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah : not according to the covenant that 1 made with their fathers, in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Kgypt ; because they continued not in my cov- enant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord. For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel, after those days, saith the Lord ; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts ; and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people : And they shall not teach every man his neighbor, and every man his brother, saying, know the Lord ; for all shall know me, from the least to the greatest." — "Finding fault with them^^ — with whom or what ? In the (Hh and 7th verses, we read of the two covenants and of their respective promises. And as these covenants and their promises are the Rwtrest antecedents to the pronoun them, in verse 8, 1S8 common readers might suppose that this pronoun dcs. notes those covenants and their promises, and so that the meaning is — God found fault with those covenants, &c. But the obvious absurdity attending this con- struction, is complete proof that the construction itself, is not tenable. For surely it is very unreasonable to suppose that Jehovah should really and absolutely find fault with covenants of Ms own institution. As the original word translated tliem, is autois, mascu- line gender, so from this circumstance, as well as from other considerations, it is certain that by them, are meant the people of Israel. But the point here which chiefly needs elucidation, is the new covenant itself. What is intended by this covenant ? It is scarcely necessary to remark, for every intelligent reader must instantly perceive, that a correct decision as to this matter is of great practical importance, for it will have a direct bearing on the subject of infant baptism. How frequently have the advocates for the perpetuity of the Abra^hamic covenant, been answered by their oppo- nents in this way, viz. — that covenant has been utter- ly abolished ; and in proof of this, how frequently and triumphantly have they alleged the passages now un- der consideration ! For hence, say they, it is evident that an entirely new covenant, and another covenant than that made with Abraham, is made with chris- tians, the old Abrahamic covenant having been abol- ished. For does not the apostle say, verse 13 : ^' In that he saith a new covenant, he hath made the first old ; now that which decayeth, and waxeth old, is ready to vanish away'' ? Hence it is concluded, that the great foundation of pedobaptism, that which pedo- baptists acknowledge to be such, viz. the nature and perpetuity of the Abrahamic covenant, is entirely swept away. But perhaps it will be made to appear in the sequel, that this conclusion is rather premature — at any rate, that it does not result from tlie premises. Let us examine the paragraph more minutely. It is manifestly a quotation from Jer. xxxi. 31 — 35. For the explanation of this very instructive portion of scrip- ture, the following remarks may be useful. 1. Whatever may be meant by this covenant, it is manifestly a covenant established by Jehovah with his people, in gospel times. For the apostle here di- rectly quotes this prophecy of Jeremiah, and applies it to gospel times — a circumstance perfectly unaccount- able on any other hypothesis than this, viz. that the prediction or promise itself, is to be fulfilled in those times. Hut as on this point there is not, so far as the writer has been informed, any debate among christians, it is less necessary to enlarge upon it. 2. This covenant is here directly opposed, not to the covenant made with Abraham, but to that which Jehovah made witii the Jews in the day when He took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt. The phrase " in the rtay," as used in the scriptures, is not always so precise in its meaning as it is when used by us. We mean thereby that very day — that very'space of twenty-four hours. But the scriptures frequently intend by the phrase, about that time ; or a time, a day, not far remote, &c. See as specimens. Gen. ii. 17 ; 1 Kings ii. 37. In the last passage we have the following address of Solomon to Shimci : " For it shall be, that on the day thou goest out, and passest over the brook Kidron, thoa shalt know for certain that thou shalt surely die.'' 8 130 But Shimei was not put to death on that very day, though he was not long afterwards. The above re- marks may help us to understand tlie true meaning of the phrase "in the day," in the text before us. Manifestly, it is not to be understood in its most re- stricted sense, for in that selfsame day, that they went out of the land of Egypt, Jehovah made no covenant at all with them, either new or old. It refers, in a word, to, and means that period when, " Moses brought forth the people out of the camp to meet with God. Ami mount Sinai was altogether on a smoke — and the smoke thereof ascended as the smoke of a furnace, and the whole mountquaked greatly." Ex. xix. 17, 18. The covenant then, here meant, as that to which this new covenant is opposed, is not the Abraharaic, but the Sinai covenant. This conclusion is both justified and established by the fact, that the great and principal object of the apostle, in this epistle, was to contrast law and gospel — to illustrate the superiority of the christian to the legal dispensation, and more defin- itely still, to prove to the Hebrews, that their Sinai Covenant, on which the whole fabric of Judaism was built, had been abolished, and succeeded by the chris- tian dispensation, and thus to prevail on tliem to "stand fast in the liberty wlierewith Christ had made them free.'' On the whole, it is very evident that the new covenant, here mentioned, was not new, with respect to the Abrahamic covenant, as though it were oppos. cd to, or radically different from that covenant, but new with respect to the Sinai covenant, and opposed to that. The covenant God made with the Jews at - that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect." The conclusion of the whole matter is, that the passage before us, affords not the least evidence that the Abrahamic covenant has ever been abolished. That covenant still continues, and will continue until its capital and glorious proraise> '* in thee shall all families, all nations be blessed/' shall be fulfilled. 3 Further — to explain this new covenant, it should be observed, tliat one thing, and one great thing, meant by it, is the renovation of the hearts of men, by the Holy Spirit. The scriptures use the word covenant in various senses. Sometimes they mean by it, an absolute promise, as in Dent. iv. 13 — sometimes a pi- ous resolution, as in Job, xxxi. 1 — -sometimes a mu- tual agreement, Mai. ii. 14 — and sometimes the spir- itual regeneration. And that this last is meant, among other things, in the scripture before us, is evident from the following words, manifestly designed as explaua, tory of the nature of this covenant, viz. " For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel, after those days, saith the Lord ; I will put ray lawg tiito theiv mhuh and write them in their hearts ; and I will be to them a Ood, and they shall be to me a people.'' Once more — the time to which this glorious promise has principal n'«!j)ect, is evidently yet futtire. Thus much we must believe, whether the phrases, " house «f Israel, and bouse of Judah," be understood as de- 13g noting ^' Israel aftei* the flesh/' or the true Israel and Judah. For verily the time has never yet come, when it has been unnecessary for one man to teach his neighbor, and another man his brother, saying, ^'know the Lord" : nor has the glorious day ever yet arrived, among either Jews or Gentiles, (though we believe it surely will,) when they " have all known the Lord from the least to the greatest." Chap. x. 29. " Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the spir- it of grace?" — The only clause in this verse on which I shall now particularly remark, is the following, viz. *^ wherewith he was sanctified." The question is, who is meant by the pronoun he, in this place ? An. swer — Jesus Christ is probably meant. The rules of syntax seem to require, or at least to favor, this construction ; for the Son of God is the nearest ante- cedent. Bat is it proper to say, that Jesus Christ was sanctified ? In reply, it must be observed, that the original word, translated sanctified, is used in the scriptures in two senses. Both hadash in the He- brew, and AGiAzo in the Greek, signify sometimes to make holy, in the spiritual sense of the expression — sometimes to devote, dedicate, or consecrate to some religious or important purpose. In the first mention- ed sense it cannot, with truth, be said that our Lord was sanctified ; for the saying so would manifestly imply, that previously to such sanctification, (by the Wood of the covenant,) he was unholy and sinful — a 133 sentiment utterly repugnant to the scriptures, wkicb characterize him as holy, harmless, undefiled, and separate from sinners, and as knowing no sin. But in the last mentioned sense our Lord was sanctified ; i. e. he was devoted, consecrated to God in the media- torial work. He was called a Nazarene ; and al- though his enemies applied this epithet to him re- proachfully, yet, (as was the case with the inscription on the cross,) the Holy Ghost designed it as signifi- cant and charactcristical : for in the true sense of the word, our Saviour was a Nazarite — separated not only from sin, but also from all such employments as, though lawful, and honorable, and useful, were not of a sacred character, and devoted exclusively to the work which the Father had " given him to do." Hence, his language to the Jews, (John x. 36,) ^^ Say ye of him, whom the Father hath aanctified, and sent into the world," &c. Hence, his remark in his inter- cessory prayer, " And for their sakes I sanctify my- self." liut if the pronoun he, in this verse, should be supposed to mean a mere man, and of course an apostate from Christianity, still on account of the two- fold sense in which the word sanctify is used, it will be very difiicult to educe from hence any substantial argument against the preservation and final persever- ance of the saints. Chap. xi. 4. ^* By faith Abel off'ered unto God a more excellent sacrifice than Cain, by which he obtained witness that he was righteous, God testify- ing of his gifts." — The word here translated *• more excellent," signifies merely more, it being in the com- parative degree from the word polus, much. The 134r passage then^ exactly translated, would run thus — ' By faith Abel offered unto God more, or more of a sacrifice, than Cain.' True, Abel's sacrifice was more excellent than Cain's : but the apostle seems to have meant something more definite, than what is ex- pressed by the general ])hrase, "more excellent." He meant that Abel's oblation, partook more of the na- ture of a 'proper sacrifice, than Cain's. Additional proof, that such was his meaning, will appear from attending to the history of the affair as recorded, Gen. iv. 3 — 5 : " And in process of time it came to pass, that Cain brought of the fruit of the ground an offering unto the Lord. And Abel, he also brought of the firstlings of his flock, and of the fat thereof. And the Lord liad respect unto Abel, and to his offer- ing. But unto Cain, and to his offering. He Iiad not respect. And Cain was very wroth, and liis counte, nance fell." You see then, that Cain's oblation was vegetable ; — Abel's was animal, and hence, possessed a more exact resemblance than Cain's, to that great and efficacious sacrifice, which Jesus Christ after, wards made of himself, when he " died the just for the unjust, and bore our sins in his own body, on the tree." The matter therefore, of Abel's oblation, made it more the nature of a proper sacrifice, than Cain's : so also, did the manner in which it was presented ; for *• hy faith Abel offered his sacrifice :" but not so did Cain — 'Mie was of tliat wicked one." 1 John, iii. 13. Chap. xi. 6. " But without faith it is impossible to please Him," &c. — This scripture needs to be eur forced, far more than to be explained. It may, how- 135 ever, be properly observed, that the faith, here spoken of, means directly faith in God, as is evident from the immediately subsequent w ords — " for he that cometh to God^ must believe that he is," &c. Chap. xii. i, 9. "AVherefore, seeing wc also arc compassed about with so 2;reat a cloud of m itnesses^ let us lay aside every weight, and the sin which doth 80 easily beset us, and let us run with patience the race that is set before us, looking unto Jesus, the au- thor and finisher of our laith.'' — The connective word, "wherefore," plainly shows that these verses arc a kind of inference from the preceding chapter, and that of course, by the great cloud of witnesses, we are to understand the ancient worthies there enumerated — a plain proof, by the way, of a separate state ; of a state of existence after death. Uut what arc we to under- stand by ^* the sin which so easily besets iis'^ ? Some understand thereby, some constitutional sin, as it is called ; i. e. some infirmity or predominant sinful pro- pensity peculiar to individuals, and occasioned by the peculiar temperament of their minds or bodies, or of both. Such propensity is supposed to be in some, the irascible ; in some, the covetous ; in some, the sensual, &c. Now that every christian and every man has some'besetting sin in this sense of the terms, must be admitted. It seems, however, that this could not be what the apostle intended by the phrase in this place: for the same easily besetting sin he mentions, is rep- resented as besetting at the same time, all the Hebrew christians, and himself among the rest. But such constitutional sin as has been mentioned, is peculiar to individuals. At least, it would be very absurd to 130 suppose that precisely the same constitatioual infirmi- ty could be attached to a whole community, consist- ing of many hundreds or thousands, among whom must exist and appear a vast variety, with respect to constitutional temperament of both mind and body. — Unbelief, particularly, as including the danger of final apostacy, appears to have been what the apostle meant by this sin. For this is, in fact, the sin which easily besets all christians. Mark xvi. 1+; Luke xvii. 5 ; Heb. iii. IS. Further, from the connexion and from the general scope of the apostle, it is mani- fest that this sin is directly opposed, both to the virtue which had been so accurately defined and so highly celebrated in the preceding chapter, which was faith, j and also to the duty immediately urged, viz, "looking * unto Jesus" — which also is faith. Hence arises aux- iliary evidence that the sin itself is unbelief, as above explained. — Before we leave this subject, it is natural to reflect — what a solemn and energetic motive to ac- tivity and diligence in running the christian race, is here set before us ! There is evidently, throughout the whole of this first verse, an allusion to such races as were performed at the Olympic and other ancient games. See the note on 1 Cor. ix. 24 — S6. We also, like those runners, are surrounded by a great cloud of witnesses, perhaps by the spirits of some of our near departed relatives and friends, as specta- tors of our race. liike them ive must lay aside and throw away every thing which would retard our progress — such as our sins, worldly cares, &c. and as theij pressed forward toward the mark, having their eyes constantly fixed on the gOal — the end of theii' race, so must we press forward, looking constantly unto Jesus, or, as the original exactly imports, look- ing oif — i. e. looking intensely, looking off from every created object, unto Jesus, who is not only the author^ but perfecter of our faith : and still proclaims, " be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life.'' Rev. ii. 10. Chap. xii. I7. ^'For ye know how that after- ward, when he would have inherited the blessing, he was rejected : for he found no place of repentance^ though he sought it carefully with tears.'' — The ques- tion is, what is meant by the pronoun it in this verse? To what does it refer — to the blessing, or to repen- tance ? In other words, what was it which £sau so earnestly sought, but could not find ? I answer — re- pentance. This appears from the very structure of the sentence. For the first clause of this verse, is wholly distinct from the last, and is accordingly sep- arated from it, in our bibles, by a colon ; and of course, as METANOiAS (repentance) is the nearest, so it is the only proper antecedent to the pronoun auteen (it). Repentance then, was the object which Esau could not find ; no, not " although he sought it carefully with tears." But how can this be consistent with such scriptures as these : ^' Ask, and ye shall receive ; seek, and ye shall find ; knock, and it shall be opened un- to you : for every one that asketh, receiveth ; and he that seeketh, findeth ; and to him that knocketh, it shall be opened." ? Mat. vii. 7> 8. In reply, it must be observed, that the repentance Esau sought, was repentance not in himself, but in his father ; and that, as sought for in his father, it was not of an evangelical, but wholly of a worldly nature. But to understand T 138 this matter fully, we must go back to the history to which this passage refers. Gen. xxvii. 34 — 39 : '^ And when Esau heard the words of his father, (i. e. his declaration that he had blessed Jacob, and that he should be blessed,) he cried with a great and ex- ceeding bitter cry, and said unto his father, bless me, even me also, my father. And he (Isaac) said, thy brother came with subtil ty, and hath taken away thy ble«sing. And he (Esau) said, is not he rightly nam- ed Jacob? for he hath supplanted me these two times : he took away my birthright, and beliold now he hath taketi away my blessing. And he said hast thou not reserved a blessing for me ? And Isaac answered and Said unto Esau, behold I have made him thy lord, and all his brethren have I given unto him for servants, and with corn and wine have I sustained him, and what shall I do now unto thee, my son ? And Esau said unto his father, hast thou but one blessing my father? bless me, even me, also, my father. And Esau lifted up his voice and wept." — How earnest was the son ; but how inflexible the father ! Esau sought repentance in his father's mind, but could not find it, though he sought it carefully with tears. The precise meaning of the word metanoia, is a change of mind ; and the evident and sole meaning of this pas- sage is, that Esau could not change his father's mind with respect to the benediction. The patriarch had already blessed Jacob, " yea, and he should be bles. sed.'^ Chap. xii. S4. " — and to the blood of sprink- ling, that speaketh better things than that of Abel." — In many respects does the blood of Christ speak bet- isd ter things than that of Abel, but chiefly in this : the latter crieth for vengeance, (Gen. iv. 10)— the former, for mercy. Its language is, " Father forgive theui; for they know not what they do." 14a JAMES. Chap. i. 13. " Let no man say, when he is tempt- ed, I am tempted of Grod ; for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth He any man.''— But how can this text be reconciled with Gen. xxii. 1 : " And it came to pass after these things, that God did tempt Abraham" ? It must be acknowledged that the verb translated tempi, tempteth, is the same in the Greek New Testament, and in the Septuagint translation of the Old ; the Greek verb in both cases corresponding to the Hebrew nasah. But there is no contradiction between these two texts ; for the same verb peirAzow, is used sometimes in a good sense, sometimes in a bad one. It is used in a good sense, John vi. 6 ; S Cor. xiii. 5 ; Heb. xi. 17f It is used in a bad sense. Mat. xvi. 1, and xxii. 18, 35 ; 1 Cor. x. 9 ; 1 Thess. iii. 5. As used in the good sense, it signifies merely io prove, to make trial of— but as used in the last, to solicit to sin. The above remark sufficiently illustrates the true meaning as well as the mutual consistency, of the two passages in James and Genesis. When Moses says, '^ God did tempt Abraham," he means simply — He tried, proved him. When James says, " neither tempteth He any man," he means — He doth not soli- cit any one to sin. In this last sense, ^^ every man is tempted when he is drawn away of his own lust and enticed." Verse 14. Chap. ii. 24. " Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only." — So says St. James : But Paul seems to speak quite differently ; 141 for he says, Rora. iii. 20 : " Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight" ; and again still more definitely in verse S8 : " There- fore we conclude, that a man is justified by faith with- out the deeds of the law." Now on first inspection it is evident, that either these two apostles expressly contradict each other, or they must speak of different Jeinds of justification. The latter is undoubtedly the truth. St. Paul is speaking of justification before God. His words are, " by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sighty^ or as the ori- ginal exactly imports, before Him. But James treats of a somewhat different subject. His main object is to show that true faith is not a fruitless principle — that faith and works must and will go together, and that whenever supposed faith is not accompanied with good works, it is worthless, yea, is no faith. For thus he speaketh : " What doth it profit, my brethren, tliough a man say he hath faith and have not works ; can faith save him ? If a brother or sister be naked and destitute of daily food, and one of you say unto them, depart in peace, be ye warmed and filled ; notwith- standing ye give them not those things which are need- ful to the body ; what doth it profit ? Even so faith, if it have not works, is dead, being alone. Yea, a man may say, thou hast faith, and I have works; show me thy faith without thy works, and I will show thee my faith by my works. Thou believest that there is one God ; thou doest well : the devils (i. e. the demons) also believe, and tremble- But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead ?" Verses 14 — 20. The doctrines of gratuitous justifi- cation before God; and of salvation by mere sovereign 14a grace, as taught by St. Paul, had beeu abused by some in the apostolic age, (as well as in our own,) and^^ perverted to very bad purposes. See Rom. vi. 1 ;* Jude, 4. Their language was to this purpose — * if we are saved by grace, then works are unnecessary, and we may live and act as we please.' Now it was probably with a view to such abuse and perversion, and effectually to prevent them in time to come, that St. James became such a strenuous advocate for works. On the whole, in the case before us, there is no con- tradiction between these two apostles. Paul pleads for the reality — James for the visibility. In short, the former intends justification before God — the latter^ justification before men. Chap. v. 16. " — The effectual fervent prayer of a righteous man availeth much" — literally the inwrought prayer, i. e. the prayer wrought in his soul by the Holy Spirit. Though however, the original word must express in this place, primarily and direct- ly, not so much the exercises and agency of the crea- ture in prayer, as divine influence producing such ex- ercises and agency ; yet the former are also referred to, viz. the personal earnestness of the righteous man in prayer. Thus much, to be sure, appears from the instance the apostle immediately mentions, the in- stance of Elijah. " Elias was a man subject to like passions as we are, and he prayed earnestly — prayed with a prayer (an Hebrew idiom) that it might noj rain,'' &c. — Have we ever prayed in this manner ? 143 I. PETER. Chap. i. 5. " Who are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation." — PhrouroumenouS; translated kejd, is properly a military, or rather a mar- tial term, and signifies kept as in a garrison, A cir- cumstance this, showing in a very impressive manner, how strongly believers are fortified in their strong holdf the Lord Jesus. They are kejit or garrisoned by the power of God through faith unto salvation. — How does the expression guard against presumption on the one hand, and indolence on the other ! We must not presume on ** our own power or holiness," as though they were sufficient to keep us. No — it is by the power of God that we are kept. But what shall we say then — that there is nothing for us to do ? Far be it that we should say or think so. We must believe, must use the means, must work out our own salvation, and give all diligence for this purpose. In short, divine power is the efficient, our own diligence the instrumental, cause, of our christian preserva- tion, and final perseverance. And what God hath join- ed together, let not man presume to put asunder. Chap. iii. i9, 20. "By which also he went and preached unto the spirits in prison ; which sometime were disobedient, when once the long-suffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a pre- paring, wherein few, that is, eight souls, were saved by water." — From this scripture, some have inferred that our Saviour, after his crucifixion, actually went to the regions of the damned, and there preached the 144 gospel, and offered salvation. And this sentiment bae been supposed to derive yet further countenance, from the noted passage in Ps. xvi. 10 ; which by St. Pe- ter, Acts ii. 31, Is expressly applied to Jesus Christ. JBut for the true meaning of Acts ii. 31, see the crit- icism on that verse (in page 42) ; where it was shown that the word there translated hell, signifies not the re- gion of torment, but the grave, the state of the dead. To hell — the place of torment, our Saviour never went. Neither does the text, now under consideration, aiford the least evidence that he did. It is not said, he went to the prison of those spirits ; but that he went, or rather preached to the spirits in prison. Besides, the word here rendered preached, is not that which signifies, by way of eminence, to preach the gospel, or to declare the glad tidings. The original word signifies, merely, to pub- lish, to proclaim as an herald, or public crier. And although it is in the scriptures frequently applied to the gospel, to denote the publication of that ; yet, it is by no means restricted to that application, but is equally applicable to evil as to good, to happiness as to misery. See the notes on Mark iii. 15. There- 1 fore, even on the absurd supposition, that Christ was employed, during the interval of time between his death and resurrection, in an embassy to those in. carcerated spirits, it would not follow that he certain- ly published the gospel to them — that he declared to them the good news, the glad tidings. But his pub- lishing, his preaching, might have been only a renewed annunciation, that * there remained no more a sacrifice for their sins ; but a certain fearful looking for of judgment, and fiery indignation, which should devour them as adversaries.' Heb. x. S6, 27^ 145 But it is time to shew positively, what the real meaning of this scripture is. And for this purpose it must be observed, that the spirits here mentioned^ are evidently the spirits — the souls of Noah's con- temporaries : for they are said to have been disobedi^ ent when once the long-suffering of God waited in the days of J^Toah. But surely this was impossible, unless they then existed. And whereas it is said these spirits were (or are) in prison, (for the original will authorise either construction.) this imports that they were, i. e. when St. Peter wrote, as well as that they are now in the prison of torment. To those spir- its, souls, or persons, while they were on earth, Christ by his spirit, preached through, or by meanil of his servant Noah ; i. e. he sent Noah to preach to his contemporaries, the wicked inhabitants of the old world — to pulilish, proclaim to them, the impending judgments of Jehovah, especially the tremendous judgment of a general deluge, which, unless they should seasonably repent, would soon come, overtop the highest mountains, and utterly exterminate all that guilty generation from off the face of the earth- Such appears to be the true and the sole meaning of the above passage. 146 11. PETER. Chap. ii. 1. ^^ But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teach- ers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them." — The words translated damnable heresies, are aireseis APOLEiAS, signifying, literally, heresies of destruc- tion, i. e. destructive heresies. Of these, only one is here specified, viz. *^ denying the Lord that bought them." This implies not only a practical disobedience to his authority, but also, and most di- rectly, a denial of his divinity — of his true character. And surely " he that hath an ear, should hear what the Spirit here saith to the churches." This warning is as appropriate and as necessary to be regarded now, as it was in the apostolic age. For how many false teachers are there now among the people, who introduce destructive heresies, and particularly the one just mentioned ; teachers who deny the Lord that bought them — who deny his divinity — who assert tJiat he was a mere man, or at most a mere creature — and who do this and such like things -privily, not let- ting their real sentiments be known at first, nor until by artful management they shall have prepared the way for their probable ultimate triumph ! But how dreadful will be the end of such teachers, and of their deluded followers ! They "bring on themselves swift destructions." 147 I. JOHN. Chap. i. 7. *^ If we walk in the light as He is in the light, we have fellowship one with another." — On this passage, I shall make only one remark, and that not so much critical as practical. It is this : that in order to enjoy fellowship with our christian brethren, it is absolutely necessary that we should walk in the light ourselves ; should live near to God, especially in the performance of secret duties. Our hearts must be right toward Him and His truth, in order that they may be rigfit toward, and with, our brethren. Chap. iii. 9. " Whosoever is born of God, doth not commit sin ; for his seed remaineth in him : and he cannot sin, because he is born of God." — It is cer- tain that this passage must be understood with some qualification : otherwise, St. John would expressly contradict otiier inspired writers, as well as the testi- mony of universal observation and experience. Yea, more — he would expressly contradict himself. For this same apostle says, (ch. i. 8,) " if we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us." The word potei, which is here translated commit, may be translated, and must here mean, work. Thus : * Whosoever is born of God, doth not work sin' — i. e. doth not make a business of it, doth not practise sin, doth not sin allowedly and habitually as others do. The reason is, " his seed remaineth in him" — that seed of divine truth and grace, which is incorruptible — that principle of life and vigor which is always in his soul, and always operative in couu- 148 teracting sinful exercises, and in exciting bim to those which are good. Neither, for this reason, and because he is truly born of God, can he sin, viz. as others do ; that is; it is morally impossible that he should. 14« JUDE. Verse 9. "Yet Michael the archangel, when con- tending with the devil, (he disputed about the body of Moses,) durst not bring against him a railing accusa- tion, but said, the Lord rebuke thee." — The only par- ticular in this verse, of which I shall attempt an ex- planation, or which, indeed, appears necessary to be explained, is that which relates to Michael's dispute and contention with the devil, about the body of Mo- ses. By the body of Moses, is probably meant, his dead body — his corpse. We read in Deut. xxxiv. 5, 6 : "So Moses, the servant of the Lord, died there, in the land of Moab, according to the word of the Lord. And He buried him in a valley in the land of Moab, over against Beth-Peor : but no man knoweth of his sepulchre unto this day." The Lord then buri^ ed Moses, but probably through the instrumentality of Michael the archangel. The reason for this extraor- dinary burial of Moses' body, and for its subsequent concealment, is not revealed. It is supposed, howev- er, to have been as follows, viz;, that the archangel perceived that if the Israelites had buried him, and had of course known the place of his sepulchre, they would afterwards have dug up his body, and used it for idolatrous purposes. The devil is supposed to have known all this, as well as Michael. Hence, he endeavors to get possession of the body. In the mean time, however, Michael interposes, resists the devil, and frustrates his sacrilegious purposes. Such mutu- al contest between Michael and the devil, is supposed to be the thing intended ux this verse. The above ap-: 100 pears by far the most satisfactory interpretation, es- pecially, when we consider the fact, that the devil's po- licy has always been to promote the above mentioned species of idolatry. And alas! in this he has been too successful, as appears, particularly, in the Romish Church, where worship of demons, of saints and im- ages, has been^ and still is so general. 151 REVELATION. Chap. iv. 6. " And before the throne was a sea of glass like unto crystal : and in the midst of the throne, and round about the throne, were four beasts full of eyes before and hehind." — The word beast, in our language, properly denotes a brute, an irrational animal ; of course a mere agent, not a moral agent of any kind. In this sense, also, the word is understood by common people. Hence the difficulty of their un- derstanding what St. John means in his representation of these four beasts, as round about the throne of God, and as there uniting with the twenty-four elders in their celestial praises. Can beasts, say they, be in heaven ? For the information then of common readers, it should be observed, that although in A. D. 1613, when the present Engljsh version of the bible was published, the term beasts, as it was then understood^ might have have correctly expressed the import of the original word, (zowa.) this is not the case now. The word means, precisely, livivg creatures. And though the word itself is generic, and may mean liv- ing creatures of any description, and does, in fact, sometimes denote dumb creatures, brutes, as in Heb. xiii. 11 ; S Pet. ii. 12 ; yet, in this passage, it must signify intelligent and holy creatures only ; for surely none but such can be round about the throne of Je- hovah. Chap. xi. 1 — 14. "And there was given me a reed like unto a rod : and the angel stood, saying, rise, and measure the temple of God, and the altar, and them 153 that worship therein. But the court which is without the teraple leave out, and measure it not ; for it is giv- en unto the Gentiles ; and the holy city shall they tread under foot forty and two months. And I will give power unto my two witnesses, and they shall prophecy a thousand two hundred and threescore days^ clothed in sackcloth. These are the two olive-trees, and the two candlesticks, standing before the God of the earth. And if any man will hurt them, fire pro- ceedeth out of their mouth, and devoureth their ene- mies; and if any man will hurt them, he must in this manner be killed. These have power to shut heaven, that it rain not in the days of their prophecy : and have power over waters to turn them to blood, and to smite the earth with all plagues, as often as they will. And when they shall have finished their testi- mony, the beast that ascendeth out of the bottomless pit shall make war against them, and shall overcome them, and kill them. And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually is call- ed Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was cruci- fied. And they of the people, and kindreds, and tongues, and nations, shall see their dead bodies three days and an half, and shall not suffer their dead bod- ies to be put in graves. And they that dwell upon the earth shall rejoice over them, and make merry, and shall send gifts one to another ; because these two prophets tormented them that dwelt on the earth. And after three days and an half the Spirit of life from God entered into them, and they stood upon their feet ; and great fear fell upon them which saw them. And they heard a great voice from heaven saying un- to them. Come up hither. And they ascended up to 153 heaven in a cloud ; and their enemies beheld them. And the same hour was there a great earthquake, and the tenth part of the city fell, and in the earthquake were slain of men seven thousand : and the remnant were aifrightcd and gave glory to the God of heaven." — As the above paragraph is more determinate with respect to meaning and application, than many other parts of the apocalypse, and discloses many most important events in ecclesiastical history, a part of which have already taken place, it is for these reasons considered as proper for insertion in this work. A reed having been given to the apostle, he was di- rected therewith to measure the temple of God and the altar, and them that worshipped therein. By the tem- ple of God and the altar, are meant the places where spiritual worship was performed ; and, by them that worshipped therein, those who really performed such worship. The court without the temple, (verse 2,) signifies nominal christians, formal professors — this court being given to the Gentiles, denotes that such professors would be so much under the influence of the maxims, policy, and power, of the surrounding ungodly world, as to be thereby greatly " corrupted from the simplicity which is in Christ" ; and these Gentiles treading the holy city under foot forty-two months, ex- hibits the duration of the Papal tyranny, and of the depression of the true religion. It is said, (verse 3,) " And I will give power unto my two witnesses, and they shall prophecy a thousand two hundred and three- score days clothed in sackcloth." These two wit- nesses cannot mean two individuals, because these same two witnesses are represented as prophecying through the entire duration of the apostacy, i. e. dur* X 154 i'ng the whole 1S60 clays. For these 1S60 days are ma,mfest\y prophetical days, i. e. so many literal years, (according to the computation in Num. xiv. 34 — "for- ty days, each day for a year,") and denote, of course, a duration the same with that of the 4S months : for 43 multiplied by 30, the average number of days in a month yield a product of 1260. But it is very absurd to suppose that two individuals should prophecy for such a great length of time ; because never, not even in the antediluvian age, have men lived so long. The most probable opinion is, that a definite number is here used for an indefinite^ and a sufficient one, two or three having been the number specified under the law, (Deut. xix. 15,) and under the gospel too, (2 Cor. xiii. 1,) as necessary and sufficient for the confirma- tion of any testimony, or for the establishment of any matter of fact. By these two witnesses prophecyiv^^ is meant not their predicting future events, but their expounding scripture, as the word is frequently used in 1 Cor. ch. xiv. — their instructing the people, and particularly their bearing testimony against the corrup- tions and wickedness of that period. The general meaning of this verse appears to be, that during the entire continuance of that nominally christian, but yet really anti -christian, power, a competent number of witnesses would be raised up to protest against its enormities, as in the sequel we shall see, has hitherto been the case. — These two witnesses are said, (verse 4,) to be ^^ tlie two olive trees, and the two candle sticks, standing before the God of the earth." These appellations, as applied to them, denote that they are precious in the sight of God, as were Joshua and Ze rubbabel of old, (Zech. iv. 11,) and are established to i I tts§ preserve tlie pure light of truth, and to diffuse its ir- radiating hearas among a henightcd world. If any should hurt these witnesses, (verse 5,) the signal ven- geance of Jehovah would surely overtake him for so doing. These witnesses are said (verse 6,) to " have power to shut heaven, that it should not rain in the days of their prophecy" ; by which is probably meaut, that through their instrumentality the rain of divine in- fluences would be withholden from the apostate Papal church. It is said, (verse 7?) " And when they shall have finished their testimony, the beast that ascendetU out of the bottomless pit shall make war with thera? and shall overcome them and kill them.*' The word TELESOSi, may be understood as meaning, ' when they shall be about to finish' ; and as it may be thus trans- lated, so in this place it should be : for as the exasper- ation and violence of the beast against the witnesses were evidently owing to their testimony , (see verse 10,) so such exasperation and violence must have been, principally, contemporaneous with the testimony itself. Surely, when the cause ceaseth, the effect must cease also. We read, (verse 8,) " And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of that great city,'which spiritu- ally is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified." By the great city, must be meant, generally, the Roman empire, which is here by impli- cation assimilated to Sodom and Egypt. Sodom was distinguished for its lewdness, and Egypt for its cru- elty ; and Papal Home has been similarly notorious for its spiritual lewdness or idolatry, and for its reli- gious cruelty. In that great city, i. e. in Judea, which was then an integral part of the empire, our Lord was literally crucified, and in that same city also, He has 156 been often spiritually wounded and crucified in the house of his professed friends. The surrounding un- godly world, beholding tiie witnesses already dead, (verse 9, 10,) would be so far from being moved with sympathy towards them, that they would even deny them the customary and very reasonable privileges of sepulture : yea, they would even ^^ rejoice over them, and make merry, and send gifts one to another," to testify their mutual congratulations. But behold, *^ the triumphing of the wicked is short," for ^^ after three days and an half, the Spirit of life, from God, entered into them, and they stood upon their feet, and great fear fell upon them that saw them" (verse 11). The reason why three days are specified, may be, that this is ordinarily the longest time a dead body will lie without putrefying : and it may hereby be intimated, that as at the close of this time, such a body is on the very point of putrefaction and destruction, unless some more than human means are immediately used for its preservation, so it would be with these witnesses. But man's extremity, especially the Church's ex- tremity, is God's opportunity. At this most critical time, " the Spirit of life, from God, enters into them," and they revive and prophecy again. Hence, by the way, appears a complete confutation of the opinion of some, viz. that the death of the witnesses, is to be understood literally. For undoubtedly, their death, and their resurrection, are analogous to each other. If then their death was literal, their resurrection must be so also. But how absurd would be such a con- struction ! These witnesses then, ^^ heard a great voice from heaven, saying, come up hither, and they ascended up to heaven, in a cloud, and their enemies 167 beheld them," verse 13 ; i. e. they were not only ele vated to a conspicuous and honorable station, but be- come the objects of special divine protection — to the amazement and mortification of their enemies. '•' And the same hour (verse 13,) there was a great earthquake? and the tenth part of the city fell, and in the earth- quake were slain of men seven thousand, and the rem- nant were affrighted, and gave glory to the God of heav- en." This teaches us, that after the resurrection and ascension of the witnesses, there would be a great shaking and revolution among the apostate Papal church — a tenth, or a considerable part of it would immediately fall, i. e. secede from Papal jurisdiction, and connexion, and receive the truth as it is in Jesus; and the remainder would be so far "affrighted" by this unexpected occurrence, that they would, in a sense, " give glory to the God of heaven," or al least, cease from open hostility and persecution, and acknowledge His providence. In support of the above interpretation, and particularly for the purpose of illustrating, in part, the conflict between the beast and the witnesses, some facts will be mentioned. In about A. D. 320, pagan persecution ceased. Un- der the reign of Constantine, the first christian empe- ror, Christianity became the established religion of the Roman empire. But alas ! the gold soon became dim, and the most fine gold was soon changed. That worldly ease and affluence which arose from gover- mental protection, proved more injurious to the inter- ests of vital godliness, than pagan persecution had ever been. Ambition characterized the bishops, and dis- soluteless of manners, the people. In A. D. 606, the bishop of Rome, was by an imperial edict, constituted 158 universal bishop ; imd the saints then began to be de- livered into his hand. In A. D. 7^7, a papal coun- cil decreed the worsliip of images. Meanwhile, how- ever, the witnesses appeared ; and in A. D. 794, a council of 300 bishops condemned such worship. In the eleventh century, the witnesses grew more numerous, more bold, and more successful. The most distinguished of them in that age, were the Waldenses and the Albigenses. In the vallies of Piedmont, they ^'^ kept the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus.'' In A. ]). 1206, the inquisi- tion, that horrid engine of popery, was established, and these faithful witnesses first experienced its cruelties. But neither by that, nor by any other papal cruelties, or stratagems, was their ardor cooled, or their courage abated* They still went on boldly, declaring ' that the church of Rome had renounced the faith of Christ? and was the whore of Babylon — that the fire of pur- gatory, the sacrament of mass, the worship of saints, &c. were inventions of satan.' Perceiving that the ignorance, w^orldly-mindedness and dissoluteness of the Papal clergy, had been the great means of the so general prevalence of error and wickedness, and wisely concluding, that for the restoration and preser- vation of the " faith once delivered to the saints," a pious and learned ministry was, under God, necessa- ry — they soon turned their attention to this object. Among other means used to attain it, was the follow- ing : They required of their pastors, that before they were ordained, " they should learn by heart all the chapters of Matthew and John, all the canonical epistles, and a good part of the writings of David, Solomon and the prophets." In A. B. 1SS9, the i5d Papists fortid the use of the scriptures to the com- mon people. The witnesses, however, soon arose to frustrate the fatal edict. The Papal maxim, that *' ignorance is the mother of devotion," they boldly condemned, and declared and proved the indispensa- ble necessity of a knowledge of the scriptures, not only for ministers, but for the common people also. For several hundred years there liad been no translation of the Bible in use, beside the Latin Vulgate : and as the Latin language itself w^as not well understood, by most of the people, the necessity of the translation of that blessed volume into other languages, and par- ticularly into the PInglish, was very obvious. Ac- cordingly, in about A. D. 1307, Wickliff translated the New-Testament into English. And although for reading it many suffered death ; though Wickliff^s books, as well as his body, were burned by the Pa- pists — the holy flame could not be quenched, nor could the increasing progress of truth be arrested. In the 15th century, ^ darkness eminently covered the earth, and gross darkness the people :' yet even then the Lord had his witnesses. The most dis- tinguislied were John Huss and Jerome, of Prague, who for receiving Wickliff 's books, and for zealously propagating his sentiments, were burned to death by order of the council of Constance. Then it was that the cause of the witnesses appeared almost des^ perate. For a considerable time there was scarcely any one *^ that moved the wing, or opened the mouthy or peeped." Then eminently the witnesses were slain, and their dead bodies lay in the street of the great city, exposed to public view and contempt. Then they that dwelt on tlie earth, the adherents to the 1150 beast, rejoiced, and sent gifts one to another, because the prophets were dead. But shortly after — after, as it were, three days and an half, ^^ the Spirit of life from God," once more entered into the witnesses. Soon appeared Luther, Melancthon, Calvin, and others, through whose testimony a deadly blow was given to the beast. And then, eminently, the witnesses " ascended up to heaven in a cloud, and their enemies beheld them/^ Then their fainting cause revived : and as it was always honorable and glorious in the eyes of the Lord, (being, indeed, his own cause,) so now it began to be increasingly so in the eyes of men. In vain were the reformers' books burned, and their lives threatened. In spite of all the envy and wrath of the beastf the light of the Refoimation soon spread from Germany into most of the nations of Europe. — This blessed light still shines ; and in spite of all opposition, it will ^ shine more and more unto that perfect day,' when, as we learn from verse 15, the loud and symphonious voices of heaven shall proclaim, " The kingdoms of this world are become the king- doms of our Lord and of His Christ, and He shall ipeign for ever and ever." Chap. xx. 4, 5. ^^ And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them : and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their fore- heads, or in their hands, and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years. But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were fin- 1^ ished. This is the first resurrection.'' — It has beeto a very prevalent opinion among christians, tliat the Church of Christ is to enjoy a period of hitlierto un- parallelled prosperity. This period has been usually styled the Millennium ; and has been supposed to be predicted or referred to in several passages of scrip- ture, but in none so clearly and fully as in the one now under consideration. Hence, the interest christians have so generally had in this scripture ; hence, their solicitude to understand it ; and hence, the fre- quent inquiries for this purpose, put to ministers and others. On the subject of the first resurrection, as connected with that of the Millennium, many persons have been equally inquisitive. For this reason, and because the subject itself is of very great importance, and the illustration of it falls within the compass of the present work, these verses will now be particu- larly considered, and if possible, explained. And to this end, it is necessary only to reply to the following inquiries : 1. What is to be understood by the thousand years? 2. What by the saints reigning with Christ, during these thousand years ? And, 3. What by the first resurrection ? We inquire then, 1. What is to be understood by the thousand years, i. e. how long a period of time is hereby intended ? Now on this point, there have been three opinions.— The first, and most prevalent, is that a thousand liter- al or solar years are meant, each consisting, of course, of three hundred and sixty-five days. But to this opinion, the objection, and ajiparently a very weighty one, is, that no where she iu the apocalypse is time Y l-eckoned in this manner. In this book, various chronological terms and phrases are used, such as haU an hour, (ch. viii. 1) ; three days and a half, (ch. xi. 9) ; five months, (ch. ix. 5) ; an hour and a day and a month and a year, (verse 15) ; forty and two months, (ch. xi. 2) ; and 1260 days, (ch. xii. 6). In all these instances, time is reckoned, not literally, but mystical- ly. Hence, there is strong presumption, that the thousand years also, are thus to be reckoned. S. The next opinion is, that by the thousand years are meant, a thousand prophetical years, i. e. three hundred and sixty-five thousand years, as we reckon years. The advocates for this opinion, allege in its vindication, not only the fact above mentioned, rela- tive to the manner of computing time in other parts of this book, but also the circumstance that their inter- pretation conveys a vastly grander idea of the future reign of the Redeemer on earth, than does the literal interpretation. It is very unreasonable, they say, to suppose that the reign of Satan on earth, should be, on the whole, so much superior to that of Christ, with res- pect both to the number of its subjects, and its dura- tion, as the literal scheme of interpretation makes it to be. 3. The last opinion is, that the thousand years are here used indefinitely ; i. e. that a definite and large number, is here used to express an indefinite, and a still larger one. This sentiment certainly appears plausible from the fact, that numbers are frequently thus used in other passages of scripture ; (see inter alia, 1 Kings xix. 18 ; Rev. xiv. 1 ;) and is proba- bly the true one. Quest. S. What are we to understand by the saints ids reigning with Christ during these thousand years 5 But since the phrase of reigning with Christ, plainly implies, that Clirist will, in some sense or other, reign on earth during the Millennial prosperity of the Churcli ; since also, there is a diversity of opinion among ciiristians, with respect to the nature of that reign ; i. e. whether Christ will reign in yerson, or only by his spiritual influence : and since a right un- derstanding of this matter, will help us to understand what is meant by the saints themselves reigning with Christ ; it becomes us to inquire, in what sense Clirist will reign on earth during the thousand years. In support of the opinion, that Christ will then appear and reign in person, mucli reliance is by some, placed on Zech. xiv. 4'. **And his feet shall stand in that day upon the mount of Olives, which is before Jerusa- lem on the east," &c. But a careful examination of the context, must surely convince any candid inquirer after truth, that it is very questionable, whether this text lias any reference at all to the Millennium ; at any rate, its primary and principal reference is not sufficiently obvious to justify the above mentioned use of tlie passage. And although the text under consid- eration implies, as before observed, that Christ will, in some sense, reign on earth during the latter-day- glory of the Ciiurch ; yet it neither certifies nor inti- mates in what sense this will be. On the whole, as there are no arguments of any weiglit to prove that the Redeemer will then reign on earth in person, so there are substantial reasons against this opinion. For, 1. It would not be at all necessary, nor for the comfort of his followers. It was not so formerly. When our Saviour told his disciples that he was to 164 go bis way from them to Him that sent him, sorrow filled their hearts. But what did he then say? ^^ Nevertheless, I tell you the truth, it is expedient for you that I go away : for if I go not away, the Com- forter will not come, but if I depart I will send him unto you." Since, therefore, the Saviour's personal residence on earth was not necessary for the happi- ness of his people formerly, we may conclude it will not be so in the Millennium. — Nor will it be necessary for the general advancement of his kingdom. This has been always accomplished, not by his personal manifestation, but in consequence of the effusions of his spirit, by his power and grace, as exercised in en- lightening the minds, subduing the wills, and sanctify- ing the hearts of the children of men, 3. Several texts of scripture seem to forbid the idea that Christ will be on earth in his own proper person- during the Millennium. See, among others, the fol- lowing : Acts iii. 21. " Whom the heavens must re- ceive until the times of the restitution of all things.'^ Until those times then, or until the great day of the final judgment, Jesus Christ is to be retained in the upper world. But if so, then obviously he cannot be on earth during the thousand years, which are to pre- cede that day. Heb. ix. 38 : ^'So Christ was once of- fered to bear the sins of many : and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time^ without sin, unto salvation." Hence, we learn that the ap- pearing of Christ, at the last day, will be his second appearing. His first appearing was in the days of his flesh ; and as his final appearing to judge the world, is to be his second appearing ; so his personal mani- festation on earth during the Millennium is not of m course to be expected, i Thess. iv. 16 : " For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of tlie archangel, and the trump of God.'" Hence, we learn, that on the commencement of the great day, the Lord Jesus will descend from heaven to earth ; which, on supposition that he were already here, must appear not only unnecessary but impossible. From these considerations, it appears that Christ will not be oa earth personally during the the Millennium, but that his reign will be only spirit- ual, such as it now is. — The way is now prepared to to show directly what is meant by the saints reigning with Christ during the thousand years. Now the per- sons here referred to, were evidently martyrs, such as loved not their lives unto the death. Further, it is to be particularly remembered, that only the souls of these martyrs are mentioned as living and reigning with Christ in the glorious days. In short, the import of the expression is, that the spirit, the self-denial, the zeal, the faithfulness of preceding martyrs, will revive and reign in the people who will live in those happy days, just as the soul, the spirit of Elijah, revived and reigned in John the Baptist. To the 3d Quest, viz. What is meant by the first resurrec- tion, the answer has been in substance anticipated. — By it is meant not a literal but a spiritual resurrec- tion. St. John does not say that he saw the hodieSf but that he saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the word of God, &c. and they lived and reign- ed with Christ, &c. This therefore was what St. John meant by the first resurrection. This passage then should not be considered as synonymous with 1 Thess. iv. 16, as by some it is. When St. Paul 166 then says, ^^ the dead in Christ shall rise first/' he means a literal resurrection, as must be evident from the entire context. Accordingly, we find that in those other parts of scripture, where the literal resurrection is mentioned, the form of expression is such as conveys the idea, that in the literal sense also, the saints shall rise first. For when the resurrection of both the right- eous and the wicked is mentioned, that of the righteous Is commonly mentioned first. See Dan. xii. 3 ; John v. S9 ; Acts xxiv. 15, &c. Indeed, it appears very proper and suitable, that the dead in Christ should, in the literal sense, rise first, chiefly because tliey are first. The righteous is more excellent than his neighbor. It is proper, therefore, that with respect to the resurrection, as well as in all other things, he should have the visi- ble pre-eminence over him. But though the priority of the literal resurrection of the righteous, to that of the wicked, sufficiently appears from other passages of scripture, and is of course a truth, it is not f/ie truth here intended by St. John. Additional evidence of this appears from the very verse in which this first res- urrection is mentioned, viz. " the rest of the dead lived not again, until the thousand years were finished.'' But surely the accounts we have of the literal resur, rection in other places, (see John v. S8, 29, &c.) for- bid the supposition, that there w ill or can be such a long interval of time as a thousand years between the corporeal resurrection of the righteous and the wick- ed. What an interesting subject — interesting to christians, is that of the Millennium ! Our Redeemer shall then *^ have dominion from sea to sea, and from the river to the ends of the earth." And from accu, rate computations^ relative to the one thousand two hundred and sixty years, as well as from existing events, particularly from the present aspects of Prov- idence — and from the unparallelled means now used — and efforts now made to spread the light of the gospel — also, from the late, and present uncommon, and ve- ry frequent revivals of religion, and reformations in so many parts of Christendom ; it appears, (certainly we are allowed to hope,) that the glorious day is not far distant, yea, that it has already began to dawn. And surely, it must be the fervent wish and prayer of eve- ry well wisher to the human race. *^ Amen. Even so, come. Lord Jesus." ENP OF NOTES ON NEW TESTAMENT. APPENDIX. CONTAINING CRITICAL AND EXPLANATORY REMARKS, OR SOME OIFriCULT PASSAGES IN THE OLD TESTAMENT. OJ\rthe exploits of the magicians of Egypt, record- ed in Exodus, Chap, vii — xi. inclusive. Miracles have always been considered by christians^ as exclusively the works of Jehovah. They are contra- ry to, or rather aside from, the usual course of divme operations ; and hence, it is reasonably concluded, that they never have been, and never will be wrought, except for the accomplishment of some very important pur- pose. No purpose can well be conceived of, as more important than proving the divine mission of a prophet^ and by consequence, the divine authority of his mes- sage. And such has been supposed to have been the purpose — the object aimed at in the miraculous opera- tions of past ages. A formidable objection, however, to the sufficiency of miracles for this purpose, has by some, been considered as arising from the exploits of the magicians of Kgypt. It is natural to remark, that persons who make the above objection, must believe, of course, that the magicians M'rought real miracles. Their reasoning amounts to this — " That the magicians wrought real miracles, (i. e, on the supposition that Moses did,) appears from the circumstance, that to the accounts of Moses' operations, it is subjoined^ ^ aud the ifO magicians did so with their enchantments.' Now if the magicians wrought real miracles, then miracles are no proof of the divine mission of a prophet : or, if they are, the divine mission of these magicians is, hence, proveahle, equally with that of Moses." — Such an objection has frequently been started by infidels and sceptics. And as it is one which directly strikes at the authenticity of the holy scriptures, generally, it is hence, very important to give it a patient examina- tion. Did, then, these magicians work real miracles ? — We must conclude they did not ,* because, 1. In the instance of the lice, brought forth by Mo- ses, they acknowledged, " this is the finger of God/** This acknowledgement implies that they could not^ and that they knew they could not, perform this mira- cle. But if they had performed real miracles before, jB^hy could they not now — especially, since there was Ho more difficulty in this case than in the three others before mentioned. 2. Pharaoh himself did not believe that the magi- cians wrought real miracles. In every instance when he wished divine judgments averted, he applied to Moses, and not to his magicians. Now it is the dic- tate of reason, and Pharaoh as a rational being must have known, that the same power, or art, or agency, which could bring judgments, could also remove them. If, therefore, Pharaoh had believed that the magicians had really wrought miracles, or brought those terrible judgments on him, and on his people, it is strange that he did not sometimes apply to them for the removal of those judgments. And the wonder on this subject increases, when we consider his peculiar pride, his cvontempt of the God of Israel, and attachment to his fe i7i •Wn idolatry — principles which must have effectually prevented his application to Moses or to Moses' God, for any thing, unless in the very greatest extremity, and when all other resources failed. It seems, then| that Pharaoh did not believe that his magicians pos- sessed any miraculous power. And who could have had a better opportunity, or more advantageous means for forming a correct opinion about these men, than he had ? But if their operations were not real mira- cles, what were they ? Ans. They were mere artful imitations of the miracles of Moses ; produced, it ig probable, by tlie help of some diabolical agency. To this conclusion, various circumstances seem necessari- ly to lead ; as, 1. The original word translated enchantments, sig- nifies charms, or jugglivg tricks , by which the senses are deceived, and false appearances substituted for true. See Parkhurst, on the word. 2. It should be remembered, that of the twelve mir- acles performed by Moses, only three are mentioned as having been imitated, or, if you choose, performed by the magicians, viz. that of the rod, that of the waters, and that of the frogs. With respect to the two last, the magicians must have wrought on a much smaller scale than Moses. For when Aaron stretch- ed out his rod over the waters of Egypt, all the wa- ters that were in the river were turned to blood." Ex. vii. 20. Yea, if Jehovah's command to Aarou (verse 19,) was obeyed, as doubtloss it was, the wa- ters ill the streams, in the rivers, in the ponds, in the pools, and even in the vessels of wood, and vessels of stone, must have undergone the same transmutation. What water then, could the magiciaiis have, on which to perform their operations ? None, it seems, bat what they digged for, or what was, in some way, artificial- ly produced. The quantity of water they had to work upon, must have been very small ; and naturalists as- sert, that a small quantity of water may, by the efforts of art, merely, be made to appear red like blood. In the case of the frogs, the magicians could do but lit- tle, because Aaron had already caused them to come forth from the streams, from the rivers, and from the ponds, and they had already covered the land of Egypt. In both these cases, therefore, the magicians must have wrought on a very small scale, and no more remained to be done by them, than what might, prob- ably, have been done by the help of magic alone. We may add, 3. The magicians never led the way, but always followed Moses in their operations. This circum- stance is easily accounted for, in the supposition, that their exploits were mere imitations of the miracles of Moses, and at the same time appears utterly unac- countable on any other hypothesis. Chap. xi. 1. 2. "And the Lord said unto Moses, speak now in the ears of the people, and let every man borrow of his neighbor, and every woman of her neigh- bor jewels of silver and jewels of gold.'^ — It has been said that this command could not have been given by Jehovah, as is here asserted, because the conduct herein enjoined, would be so manifestly deceptive and unjust. "The Israelites, says the objector, are here ■aid, to have received a command from Jehovah, to borrow of their Egyptain neighbors, certain valuable prnjiments, when they were qu. the very point of d^r 17» parture from E:;ypt, and when, as appears from the very face of the account, they had no design ever to return the loan. Now all this is absolutely incredi- ble. It is incredible that Jehovah, (if He be such a Being as the scriptures represent Him, viz. " a just God and without iniquity,") should have required of His people the conduct here specified, which in the then existing circumstances, would be notliing elsa than extortion and deception." And it is probable that many sincere and humble inquirers after truth^ have experienced difficulty, in their attempts to un- derstand this passage, in any way perfectly satisfacto- ry to themselves, on account of its apparent reflection on the divine character. For the two-fold purpose, therefore, of awswering the objector, and of satisfying the humble inquirer, the following observations may be useful. The verb yishalu (from shaal,) here translated borrow, exactly means, and is commonly translated ask, demand. Accordingly, in the Septua- gint, and in the Latin Vulgate, versions of this text, words synonymous with our word ask, are used. In the former, it is aiteg, and in the latter, postulo. The meaning, therefore, of this command of Jehovah, was that the Israelites should ask or demand of their Egyptian neighbors, jewels of silver and jewels of gold. And that it was reasonable and right for them so to do, and for Jehovah to require this of them, will not be denied by any who properly reflects, that the Israelites had long been under cruel bondage to the Egyptians, and had done them many important services, for which they had; as yet^ received no com- pensation. 174 Chap, xxiii. 19. " Thou elialt not seethe a kid in his mother's milk." — The curious reader naturally in- quires for the reason of this prohibition. Had such a barbarous practice ever existed among the Hebrews? It does not appear that it ever had : but such vs^as, in those days, the practice of the surrounding heathen nations. After they had gathered in their fruits, they took a kid, and boiled it in the milk of its dam? and then in a magical vi^ay, besprinkled their trees^ fields, gardens, and orcliards, for the purpose of mak- ing them more fruitful. Now Jehovah's direction to the Jews was, " learn not the way of the heathen.'^ And it must have been principally for the purpose of preventing this, and of continuing them a " peculiar people^" that this prohibition was delivered. 17^ NUMBERS. Chap. xxii. SO — 22. " And God came unto Ba- laam by iii£;ht, and said unto bim. if tbe men come to call upon tbee, rise up, and go with them ; but yet the word that I shall say unto thee, that shall thou do. And Balaam rose up in the morning, and saddled his ass, and went with tire princes of Moab. And God's anger was kindled because he went ; and the angel of the Lord stood in the way for an adversary against him." — These verses taken in connexion, appear at first, hard to be understood, or rather reconciled. They embrace three particulars. The first is, the permission granted by God, to Balaam, on a certain condition to go with the princes of Moab. The sec- ond is, Balaam's actually going in consequence of •Uiat permission. The third is, the Lord's being an- gry with Balaam, '^ because he went." But why should, or rather how could the Lord be angry with Balaam, for doing that which He had expressly allow- ed him to do ? Ans. 1. Balaam appears not to have complied with the condition on which his going with the princes of Balak had been permitted. That condition was, "the men's coming to call him." But, it seems, Balaam did not wait for their call, but rose up in the morning, and immediately went off with the princes of Moab. It is probable that he called on them in the mornings instead of waiting for their calling on him. But, S. The motive with which Balaam went, was the thing which principally constituted his guilt, and pro- voked the anger of Jehovah. For, notwithstanding £76 all Balaam's apparent conscientiousness, in asking counsel of God with respect to the affair of going with the princes of Moab, he was evidently a bad man, and all the time wished to go ; and that not so much for the purpose of injuring Israel, or gratifying Balak, as for that of obtaining the reward. Hence, the apostle Peter, speaking of certain profligate characters, says, ^' which have forsaken the right way, and gone astray, following the way of Balaam, the son of Bosor, who loved the wages ofunrighteausness.^' And hence, the apostle Jude, speaking of similar persons, says, " Woe unto them ! for they have gone in tlie way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of Balaam /or reward.^^ Though, therefore, we should suppose that the mattet of Balaam's conduct, i. e. his going with the princes of Moab, might have been agreeable enough to the divine mind, yet the manner of it — the motive with which he went — we must allow to have been very bad. This distinction is by no means an unmeaning, or an unim- portant one. Amaziah " did that which was right in tlie sight of the Lord, but not with a perfect heart.'' in JUDGES, Chap. xi. 90, 31. " And Jephtliah vowed a vow unto the Lord, and said, if thou shalt without fail de- liver the children of Ammon into mine hands, then it shall be, that whatsoever coraeth forth of the doors of my house to meet me, when I return in peace from the children of Ammon, shall surely be the Lord's, and I will offer it up for a burnt offering." — The sub- sequent verses of this chapter, are probably familiar to most readers. Such of them, as have any concern with Jephthah's vow, will be considered in their place. The facts were these. The Ammonites in- vaded the land and people of Israel. Jephthah sent messengers to their king to know the reason of this measure, and at the same time, to dissuade him from proceeding further in hostility. " Howbeit the king of the children of Amnion hearkened not unto the words of Jephthah." When Jephthah perceived that war with the Ammonites was inevitable, he resolutely pre- pared for it ; but before he engaged therein, uttered the vow which has just been mentioned. On his re- turn to Mizpeh, behold, the first object that met him, was his lovely daughter, an only child ! On seeing her, the father was much agitated, and ^^ rent his clothes, and said, alas, my daughter ! thou hast brought me very low, and thou art one of them that trouble me : for I have opened my mouth unto the J>iord, and I cannot go back." His daughter under- standing such phraseology as importing that her fath- er had made a vow unto the Lord, and concluding al- so from his pathetic exclamation, that such vow had A a 178' arome important reference to her, surrenders herself to his disposal, with only this request, viz : that she might go up and down upon the mountains for two months^ to bewail her virginity. " And it came to pass at the end of two months that she returned unto her father, who did with her according to his vow which he had vowed, and she knew no man.'' Now all on this subject which needs any illustration, may he embraced in this single enquiry : did Jephthah ac- tually sacrifice his daughter, i. e. put her to death or not ? It must be acknowledged, that the whole story taken together, as it stands in our version, would nat- urally lead the mere English reader to conclude that he did : such accordingly appears to be in fact the gen- eral conclusion. But to the justness of this conclu- sion there are weighty objections. Consider, 1. The character of Jephthah. He was a native Jew, and had from his childhood been brought up in the Jewish religion, of which one prominent charac- teristic, was an an absolute prohibition of all human sacrifices. Further, he not only was of Israel, but be- longed to the true Israel, for he is expressly mention- ed in Heb. xi. 32, as one of those pre-eminent for faith, " of whom the world was not worthy." In con- sideration, therefore, of Jephthah's certain piety, and acquaintance with the prohibitions of Judaism, it seems almost incredible, that he should have ever seriously thought of sacrificing his daughter. It should be re- membered also, that between the time of his triumph- ant return to Mizpeh, to that of the execution of his vow, was an interim of two entire months. This surely was a period long enough for him to deliber- *ie on the subject. And if, in reflection on his vow i79 aad ill recollection of his meaning and design^ when he made it, he even felt assured that he then under- stood it as the literal scheme of interpretation suppo' ses ; still his reverential fear of God, his remembrance of the peremptory prohibitions of the divine law relative to human sacrifices, and his strong parental affection towards his daughter, his only child, must have indu- ced iiim to pause, and pause again, before he should proceed to execute his orighial intention. As " the priests' lips were to keep knowledge, and the people were to seek the law at their mouths," so in this state of necessary extieme perturbation of mind, Jephthah would naturally apply to them for advice, what to do in the pre..^ent crisis. And we may be sure that the priest*, to whom it belonged to offer burnt offerings, (f^v. XV. 30,) would neither themselves immolate his daughter, nor give to him the least intimation that the deed itself, abstractedly considered, could be, in any case, justifiable. Their language to Jephthah in this case, would probably have been to this effect : *' you have herein been rash with your mouth, and your heart has been hasty to utter such a vow before God ; and hence, sin lieth at your door. But the sin consists in the making of the vow, not in the non-fulfilment of it." But whether Jepththah did thus apply to the priests, and receive from them such instruction or not, he must ^ even of himself have judged what was right,' in this case. His own mind could not have been so igno- rant of the sacrificial laws of Jehovah, and of the sense in which they were universally understood by his countrymen, as to imagine that human sacrifices could have been acceptable to Him, or even viewed by Him otherwise than as to the last degree abominable. And 180 surely all bis pious and all his parental feelings must have been vigorously opposed to such an human sacri- fice as that now in question. In consideration therefore, of Jepththah's character, and of the above mentioned circumstances, it seems incredible that he could have actually put his daughter to death. 2. Jephthah is no where in any other part of scrip- ture, blamed for his treatment of his daughter ; a fact utterly unaccountable on the supposition, that he put her to death. Ahaz is blamed for having " made his son pass through the fire, according to the abomination of the heathen, whom the Lord cast out from before the children of Israel.'^ 2 Kings xvi. 3. For a similar practice the inhabitants of Jerusalem are also blamed. Jer. xix. 5. But Jephthah is no where blamed for sacrificing his daughter : which appears to be a strong presumptive evidence that he never did so. But how then is Jephthah's vow, with its execution, to be un- derstood ? In reply, it may be observed, that the exact, or at least, a perfeetly allowable translation of the Hebrew w^ords haalitihu olah is, ^' I will offer Him, 1. e. to Him, (Jehovah,) a burnt oifering.'' For exam- ples of a similar idiom in the Hebrew, let the follow- ing passages, as they stand in the language, be care- fully consulted, viz. Gen. xxxvii. 4 ; 2 Sam. xx. 5, and XV. 4 ; Ezek. xxi. 32 ; 1 Kings xx. 9. Accord- ing to the above translation, Jephthah's vow will con- sist of two parts. The first is a promise that what- soever, i. e. whatsoever person, should come forth out of the doors of his house, to meet him on his return? should surely be the Lord's. The second is, that he would besides this, oifer to Jehovah a burnt offering. In short, his own words will then stand thus : * And 181 it shall be that whatsoever cometh out from the doors of my house, to meet me, when I returu in peac» from the children of Aramon, shall surely be Jehovah's, and I will ofler him, i. e. to Him, (Jehovah,) a burnt offeruig.' It is easily seen, that according to this rendering of the words, so far as the vow respected his daughter, it consisted in a promise on the part of Jephthah, to devote her exclusively, and forever, to the service of God, just as Hannah devoted her sou Samuel, before he was born. See 1 Sara. i. 2. Ae- cordingly, it is believed, that Jephtliah did thus offer his daughter as smoblation, though not as a sacrifice. — The above interpretation is also contended for strenu- ously by some able Hebrew critics, as being not only admissible, but preferable to the common one. But^ <^ Prove all things, hold fast that which is good." NOTE. — It must be acknowledged, that some difficulties attend both interpretations. Tliose who believe that Jephthah actually sacrificed his daughter, ground their faith on the following things : 1. The letter of the vow itself, as it stands in our translation ; verse 51. — It has been already observed that the original may, with perfect propriety, be rendered tlius : " I will offer Him, i. e» to Him, (Jehovah) a burnt oflering." 2. The agitation of Jeplithah's mind when he saw his daughter ; v^rse 35. — ^But such agitation may be, in a good degree, accoun- ted for, on the supposition, that he knew his only daughter, his only child, was to be forever secluded from him, and devoted to the Lord, in a state of solitary and perpetual virginity — a state, which was not only in general very reproachful among the Jews, but (inasmuch as she was his only child, verse 34,) must, in her case, effectually deprive him of all prospect and possibility of hav- ing any posterity to bear up his name in Israel. 3. Her rwiuest for permission to bewail her virginity for two months with ner companions ; verse 3f. — It has been said, that if she was to be devoted by her father to the Lord, in perpet- ual virginity, such a request would be unnecessary and absurd, as on that supposition, she would have had an whole life to lament it in. Ans. The very plu*aseology here used, seems rather to cQpfirm the interpretation I have given. For observe — slie desired 188 II. SAMUEL. Chap. xii. SI — 33. " Then said his servants un- to him, what thing is this that thou hast done ? thou didst fast and weep for tlie child while it was alive ; but when the child was dead, thou didst rise and cat bread. And he said, while the child was yet alive, I fasted and wept : for I said, who can tell whether God will be gracious to me, that the child may live ? But now he is dead, wherefore should I fast? can I bring him back again ? I shall go to him, but he shall not return to me." — Without some knowledge of oriental customs, it will be very difficult to enter into the true spirit of these verses ; more especially to understand the whole of the reason, or reasons, of the liberty to bewail her virginity, not her approaching death. If she knew that she was soon to be put to death by her father, why did she not bewail her death also, as well as her virginity ^ AVill it be said, that in her mind, and in the judgment of her countrymen, a state of perpetual virginity was more to be lamented than death it- self ; so that in consideration of the former, she, as it were, lost sight of the latter ? If so, then the before mentioned agitation of Jeph- thah's mind, may easily be accounted for, without supposing that he put his daughter to death. Again — it may be observed, that her desi^ in this request, might have been, to get some time for society with her companions before her perpetual seclusion from them, and for sociaf lamentation ; for she says, " let me alone two months, that I may go up and down upon the mountains, and be- wail my virginity, I and my fellows.^- 4. The custom of the daughters of Israel, lamenting the daugh- ter of Jephthah four days in ayear. — To this it maybe replied, that one of the meanings of the Hebrew word tannoth, or with the prefix, letannoth, as appears from Buxtorf 's Lexicon, is in Latin, covfabulari, i. e. in English, to talk with. It is remarkable, that in Judges v. 11, this same verb is translated rehearse — " there shall they rehearse the righteous acts of the Lord." Hence, the com- . ment of Kimchi, the celebrated Jewish expositor, on this 40th verse. 188 askmishment expressed by the servants of Davids at the conduct of their master on this occasion. From Sir Jolin Chardin, as cited by Harraer, vol. 2. p. 495, we learn, that " the practice of the east is to have a relation of the deceased person to weep and mourn, till, on the third or fourth day at farthest, the relations and friends go to see him, cause him to eat, lead him to a bath, and cause him fo put on new vestments, he having before thrown himself on the ground." One great reason, therefore, of the astonishment of Da- vid's servants at his behaviour, appears to have risen from the circumstance, that he did not observe the common forms and ceremonies of mourning ; but im- mediately after he heard of the child's death, arose of himself from the earth, without waiting for his friends to come and see him, and raise him up, and perform towards him the various offices and ceremo- is in these words : " ut scilicet amicis colloquils earn de virginitate et statu vitae solitario consolarentur" ; in English, thus: " that in- deed, witli their friendly discourse, they might comforther concern- ing her vii^nity, and her solitary state of life." The Chalde<» and R, Solomon, explain the above verb by " ad lamentandum," and immediately add, by way of comment, " nempe, super virgini- tate ejus," in English, " to wit, on account of her virginity." — Whence it is evident, that learned Jewish doctors, who must be supposed to have understood their own language best, have con sidered this verse as meaning, that the daughters of Israel went four times in a year to converse with the daughter of Jephthah ; to condole with her on account of her virginity and solitary state of life, and to comfort her under it. But take the passage as it stands : " the daughters of Israel went to lament the daughter of Jeph- thah." The query is, what in her, or respecting her, did they la- ment ? It is not said they lamented her death : and to say they did, is to beg the question. They might have lamented only what they and Jephthah's daughter had lamented before, viz,, her vir- finitij ; verse 38. On me whole, though some difficulties attend oth interpretations, as has been observed, that which has been advocated above, appears to have the least. •/ id4 iiies which, as appears from the preceding declara- tions, were common in the east. — Again : common readers may not perceive the ichole of the import of verse 23 : " But now he is dead, wherefore should I fast? can I bring him back again? I shall go to him? but he will not return to me." Common people nat- urally suppose, that the reason why David did not fas* for the child, after it was actually dead, was, his per- ceiving that the will of heaven was done — that the child's slate, as it respected this world and the world to come, was immutably fixed by the providence of God, and that, of course, all his fasting and praying for the continuation, or rather restoration of its life, would be in vain. Such, unquestionably, was a reason, per- haps the principal one, of his cessation from fasting : but it appears there was another reason, also, for it. Mairaonides says, " the Jews did not lament infants who died before they were thirty days old." The inquisitive reader naturally asks, why there was this peculiarity in their practice relative to infants who died under this tender age? The reply which ap- pears most satisfactory is, that they believed such infants were saved, and of course, happy. Chap. xxiv. 1, S, 9, 10. " And again the anger of the Lord was kindled against Israel, and He moved David against them to say, go, number Israel and Judah. For the king said to Joab, the captain of the host, go now through all the tribes of Israel, from Dan even to Beer-slieba, and number ye the people, that I may know the number of the people. — And Joab gave up the sum of the number of the people unto the king : and there were in Israel eight hundred 185 thousand valiant men that drew the sword ; and tha men of Judah were five hundred thousand men. And David's heart smote him after that he had numhered. the people. And David said unto the Lord, I have sinned greatly in that 1 have done : and now, I be- seech thee, O Lord, take away the iniquity of thy servant ; for I have done very foolishly.'' — The whole difficulty relative to these passages, consists in understanding how David's numbering his people, could be a sin. That David believed the act to be sinful, is evident from his humble confession, and earnest peti- tion for pardon, in verse 10; and thatitwasrca%sinfuly and to an high degree so, is certain, from the awful judg- ment of pestilence, which Jehovah brought upon Israel for this very act, and by which sevenl^ tbou« sand men were slain, (verse 15). But why should David's numbering his people be such a great dn ? Is it not proper for a ruler to know not only tlie gen- eral circumstances, but also the populousness and physical strength of the people, or nation, over which he presides ? And particularly, if that nation be ex- posed to frequent depredations and wars, from hostile circumjacent nations, as the nation of Israel was ; is it not proper, yea, necessary, that its king, or chief magistrate, should know what is its military strength, that he might know what would be its ability to con- tend with them, in case of invasion ? Political wis- dom would surely dictate the propriety and necessity of such information : and why, in a moral sense, should there be any thing wrong in using the means necessary to obtain it ? We believe there is nothing wrong, politically or morally, in taking a census of the inhabitants of the United States* How then Bb 186 (Joul^ David's numbering his people be such a sin ?— To this it may be replied — The Lord had required? that when the people were numbered, half a shekel from each should be collected, for the service of the sanctuary. But as no mention is made of such collec- tion when David numbered the people, it is probable it was omitted. Again, by an express command of Je- hovah, the Levites were to be excepted in the num" bering of the people. See Num. i. 48, 49. But from the general order of David to Joab, and from the ac- count we have of Joab's consequent proceedings, i^ seems probable that the Levites were included with the rest in the general numeration. After all, David's sin in this affair consisted principally in his pride, Just as Hezekiah's did when he showed his treasures to the messengers of the king of Babylon, (3 Kings xx. 13,) and as Nebuchadnezzar's did when he said, " Is not this great Babylon, that I have built for the house of the kingdom by the might of my power and for the honor of my majesty" ? Dan. iv. 30. David's pride and ambition, prompted him to count the numb<^rs of his people, to ascertain what a great and warlike nation it was, over which he presided, of whose pros- perity he had been the principal instrument, and which he was soon to leave to his successor. Such we must suppose^ was the essence of David's sin in this affair. Chap. xxiv. S4?. " And the king said unto Araunah, Nay ; but 1 will surely buy it of thee at a price : nei. ther will I offer burnt-offerings unto the Lord my God of that which doth cost me nothing. So David bought the threshing-floor and the oxen for fifty shekels of siL ver.'^ — But ia the parallel place, in 1 Chron. xxi. 25, 187 it is said, " So David gave to Oman for the place six hundred shekels of gold by weight." Is there not an inconsistency or rather a contradiction, between these two passages ? The infidel may exultingly pretend there is ; and the superficial reader may not be able to discern and expose the fallacy of the pretence. But a moment's careful attention to these two texts, wil^ convince us that in meaning, they are perfectly con- sistent. In the first cited passage, mention is made only of the threshing floor, and the oxen ; for these, it is said, David gave fifty shekels of silver. In the last cited passage, the place is mentioned, which must have comprehended much more than the mere threshing floor and oxen. The place, probably^ included the entire tract of the mountain on which tlie temple was afterwards built, togetuer with all its appendages ; such as the house and buildings of Oman ; the threshing instruments of wood ; and the wheat for the burnt oifering. For the place thus ex- tensive and comprehensive, David gave six hundred shekels of gold. We see then, that if the two pas. sages do not speak exactly the same thing, they do not speak contrary things ; but are perfectly consistent with each other. 188 L KINGS. Chap. ii. 8, 9. '' And, behold, thou hast with thee Sliimei, the son of Gera, a Benjamite of Bahiirim, which enrsed me with a grievous curse in the day when I went to Mahanaim : but he came down to meet me at Jordan, and 1 sware to him by the Lord, saying, I will not put thee to death by the sword. Now therefore, hold him not guiltless ; for thou art a wise man, and knowest what thou oughtest to do unto him : but his hoai" head bring thou down to the grave with blood." — As to the ninth verse, with which only have I any direct concern at present, it is evident that the middle clause of it, viz. "^ for thou art a wise man. and knowest what thou oughtest to do unto him,^' ought to be understood as a parenthesis. The promi- nent subject of the verse is David's charge to Solo- mon, respecting Shimei. The middle clause of the verse is an apostroplic to Solomon, and has no con- cern at all with the charge itself, otherwise than as it declares Solomon's ability tu execute it. The charge itself, therefore, is this — " Now therefore, hold him not guiltless, but his hoar head bring thou down to the grave with blood." But still a diificulty seems to attend this passage as it stands in our version. That David, the '^ man after God's own heart," who had, in such an eminent degree, the spirit of the gospel, and ol* rourse, the spirit of forgiveness — should command Solomon to put Shimei to death, and that too after he had expressly pardoned him, (3 Sam. xix. S3.) and when he was al)out to '^go the way of all the earth," is indeed mysterious and perplexing. Hence, arises a 189 stumblins; block to the weak believer, and matter of cavil and triumph to the captions infidel. Infidels have always been ready enough to find fault with Da- vid in other respects ; and if, in this also, he is so greatly censurable as tliey suppose, he must, it seems, merit a representation far diflferent from that which christians and christian preachers usually give of him. But let us attend more directly to the charge itself : " Now therefore, hold him not guiltless, but liis hoar head bring thou down to the grave with blood" Tiie important remark relative to this verse, is, that it may just as well be translated from the ori- ginal thus : ^ Now therefore, hold him not guiltless, nor his hoar head bring thou down to the grave with blootl.' The Hebrew particle vau, which in our version is rendered but, and whicii in that just given is rendered nor, as occurring in the He])revv liible, is used with no less than sixteen different shades of meaning. Its first anr,J it also, very frequently, has a negative meaning attached to it ; or, at least, extends the force of the negative equally to the last member of the sen- tence. A few examples may illustrate the truth of this remark. 2 Sam. i. 21 : ** Ye mountains of Gil- boa, let there lie no dew, neither let there be rain upon you, nor fields of oiferings." The Hebrew particle 190 which is here prefixed to the word shedee, (fields) is VAU. which is here justly translated nor, because it is twice in the same Averse preceded by the negative par- ticle al («of, or nor). — 1 Kings, xxii. 31 : "But the king of Syria commanded his thirty and two captains? that had rule over his chariots, saying, fight neither with small nor great, save only with the king of Is- rael." In this case, also, the Hebrew^ particle con- nected with GADGL, (great) is vau, which the sense evidently requires to be rendered nor, and which, ac- cordingly, our trasislators have thus rendered. For though the particle itself, simply and abstractedly con- sidered, has a connective, rather than a disjunctive? signification ; yet, when immediately preceded by a negative particle, as in this case, it also has a negative or prohibitory meaning attached to it. — Prov. xxx. 8 : '^ Give me neither poverty nor riches." Here again the particle connected with esher, (riches) is vau, which our translators have rendered nor, for the two- fold reason, that the sense of the passage, and the peculiarity of the Hebrew idiom, require such a ren- dering. Let the Hebrew scholar, for his further satis- faction on this point, consult, in the original, the fol- lowing passages : Ex. xx. 4 ; Lev. xix. 12 ; Heut. yii. 25, and xxxiii. 6 ; Ps. xxvi. 9 ; Prov. vi. 4, and xxx. 3. — Knough has been said to show that the passage before us may as well, or with more propriety, be translated as Dr. Kennicott, and various other He- braists have translated it ; thus — " Now therefore, hold him not guiltless, nor his hoar head bring thou down to the grave with blood" And if the passage may be thus understood, i. e. if it may be understood as a, prohibition^ rather than as a command^ for Solo- 19t mon to put Shime* to death, other circumstances seem stioni;ly to reeoinmend and require such a rendering? and siicli an understanding of the words. For, 1. David had already //ar'iof^e^Z Shim "i for his pas* ofl'ence against him. The relation of the aft'air is very affecting : " And Shimei, tlie son of Gera, a Benja- minite, which was of Bahurim, hasted and came down with the men of Judah to meet David. And Bhimei, the son of {»era, fell down before the king, as he was come over Jordan ; and said unto the king, let not my lord impute iniquity unto me, neither do thou remember that which thy servant did perversely, the day that my lord the king went out of Jerusalem, that the king should take it to his heart. For'i thy servant doth know that I have sinned ; tlierefore, be- hold, I am come the first this day of all tl»e house of Joseph, to go down to meet my lord the king. And David said, shall there any man be put to death thig day in Israel ? for do not I know that 1 am this day king of Israel ? Therefore the king said unto Shimei, thou shalt not die : and the king sware unto him." — To say with some, that David pardoned Shiraei only for the pressnt, — or with others, that he meant merely that he would not put him to death, does not appear by any means satisfactory. The expression is abso- lute and decisivie — " thou shalt not die,^' i. e. thoti shalt not be put to death for this offence. S. Solomon, who must have rightly understood the meaning of this his father's charge, did not understand it as a direction to put Shimei to death for his previ- ous offence against his father. For after his ascension to the throne, Solomon " sent and called for Shimei, and said unto him^ build thee an house in Jerusalem, 198 and dwell there and go not forth thence any whither. For it shall be, that on the day thou goest and passest over the brook Kidron, thou shalt know for certain^ that thou shalt surely die : thy blood shall be upoa thine own head." 1 Kings ii. 36, 37. Now, surely, in all this, there is nothing that looks like any design on the part of Solomon, to put Shimei to death. On the contrary, th6 phraseology is such as to import, that so long as Shimei should dwell quietly in Jerusa- lem, and confine himself to his appointed limits, his life would be safe. True — Solomon did put Shimei to death ; but it was for a subsequent offence — an of- fence not against his father David, but against himself. Solomon, as we have seen, ordered Shimei to confine himself to Jerusalem : but Shimei transgressed this order ; for at the end of three years, he went out of Jerusalem unto Gath, to seek his servants (verse 40). Solomon hearing of this, sent for Shimei, and expos- tulated with him on the iniquity of his conduct, in dis- obeying him, and ordered him, for such disobedience, to be put to death. Shimei's wickedness towards king David was, indeed, mentioned by Solomon as d reason for his capital punishment : but it was mani- festly a secondary and subordinate reason. The pri- mary, principal, and only direct reason, for Shimei's destruction, was, his disobedience to Solomon's order before mentioned. Now, as Solomon did not, in fact, put Shimei to death for his offence against his father David, but permitted him to live several years after- wards, it is manifest that he did not understand the charge now under consideration, as requiring him to put Shimei to death for such offence. But what, then, was the real meaning of the charge ? Ans. It appears i 198 to be as if he had said — *Thou knowest Shiraei, the son of Gera, who once cursed me so grievously. He is verily guilty, and deserves to die. But in my clemency I pardoned him, for what he then did. Now therefore, as thou art a wise man, thou wilt readily know what management of him will be most proper. Hold him not guiltless, for he is by no means so, though I have pardoned him. He is still a wicked, artful, and dangerous man. Have your eye upon him, watch him closely, beware of giving him too much liberty. In short, let yoiT treatment of him be such, as to show that you consider him as still a guilty man — but do not put him to death for an offence which I have already pardoned.' — I shall add only, that as the above interpretation of this passage is certainlj admissible, so it completely clears the character, and justifies the conduct, of David^ in this particular. c c 194 . NEHEMIAH. Chap. vi. 5. " Then sent Sanballat his servant unto me in like manner tlie fifth time, with an open letter in his hand." — Why this letter should have been sent open or uninclosed, and indeed, why any notice at all should have been taken of this circum- stance of the letter, it is impossible to determine, with- out some other information than Avhat the Bible affords. For the illustration of this passage, we must once more refer to oriental customs. The custom of the ancient Asiatics was, and that of the Turks to this day is, as Harmer has shown, when they send letters to common and mean persons, to send them ope^i and iininclosed : but when they wrote to persons of dis- tinction^ they enclosed their letters in satin bags, " with a paper tied to it, directed and sealed, and with an ivory button tied on the wax." It is evident, there- fore, that Sanballat's sending an open letter to Nehe- juiah, was designed as an insult, as a contemptuous treatmentof him, and as an indication that he would be so far from recognizing those claims to royal digni- ty, which Nehemiah had begun to make, and which he was about to assert with still greater decision, that be would not even pay him that respect which was due to every person of any considerable distinction. The above exposition may afford some gratification to the curious, even if it do not any edification to the pious. igiif PSALMS. Ps. XX. 3. " But thou art holy, O thou that in. habitcst the praises of Israel." — The word tehilloth, translated praises, properly signifies irradiationa. Accordingly, bishop Lowth translates the verse, thus * '^thou inhahilest the irradiations — the glory of Israel.'' Surely, praises, strictly such, can never be inhabited. The word refers to those resplendent manifestations^ which Jehovah made of himself, sometimes in light and fire, as at Sinai, (Exodus xix. 18) — sometimes in the pillar of cloud and of fire, (Exodus xiii. SI) — also over the cherubim (Ezek. ix. 3, and x. 4«,). In those irradiations Jehovah's glorious presence indeed was — them He continually inliabited. Ps. xxiv. 10. " Selah." — Common readers have frequently asked the meaning of this word, which occurs about seventy times in the Psalms. For their information, it may be observed, that the word is derived from the Hebrew verb sal, which signifies to elevate, to exalt ; and that wherever used by the psalmist, it denotes that there the voice as well as the affections, should be elevated. Ps. li. 16. " For thou desirest not sacrifice^ else would I give it : thou delightest not in burnt offerings." — But did not Jehovah both desire and require sacrifices, under the former dispensation? None acquainted with the Old Testament, and believ. ing it to be His word, can deny it. What then must be the meaning of this passage ? Ans. It must mean 196 either that the Lord did not desire or require sacri- fices comparatively^ i. e. the sacrifice of brute ani- mals was of very little importance when compared with that of a broken and contrite spirit, (verse 17) ; or, which is most probable, that no animal sacri- fii-e whatever, would be accepted as an atonement for murder — one of the sins which it is the purpose of this penitential psalm to confess and lament. The statute was, *' Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed." Indeed, by the laws of Je- hovah, both murder and adultery were punishable with death. No Jewish sacrifice, no burnt oft'ering — could expiate the guilt, or save the life of the oifender. Ps. Ixxii. 6 — 17. ^^ He shall come down like rain upon the mown grass ; as showers that water the earth. In his days shall the righteous flourish ; and abundance of peace so long as the moon endureth. He shall have dominion also from sea to sea, and from the river unto the ends of the earth. They that dwell in the wilderness shall bow before him ; and liis enemies shall lick the dust. The kings of Tarshish and of the isles shall bring presents : the kings of Sheba and Seba shall oifer gifts. Yea, all kings shall fall down before him ; all nations shall serve him. For he shall deliver the needy when he crieth ; the poor also, and him that hath no helper. He shall spare the poor and needy, and shall save the souls of the needy. He shall redeem their soul from deceit and violence : and precious shall their blood be in his sight. And he shall live, and to him shall be given of the gold of Sheba ; prayer also shall be made for him continually ; and daily shall 197 he be praised. There shall be an handful of corn iu the earth upon the top of the mountains ; the fruit thereof shall shake like I^ebanon : and they of the city shall Hourish like grass of the earth. His name shall endure for ever : his name shall be continued as long as tiie sun : and men shall be blessed in him : all nations shall call him blessed." — That the pre- ceding verses, with the entire psalm, relate primarily and literally to the person and glorious reign of Solo- mon, is indubitable — But that in a secondary and spiritual sense, they are referable to the persoQ and administration of " a greater than Solomon," is con. ceded by all tiie best expositors, and is indeed very evident from the words themselves. By a beautiful allusion to various and numerous objects in the natur- al world, (objects with which the Jews were perfect- ly familiar,) — the psalmist here represents, as lucid- ly as the darkness of the age in which he lived would permit, the character, extent and duration of the then future reign of the divine Messiah. It is almost needless to add, for every christian knows, that this representation is not overstrained, but has been fully verified by facts. Yes, wherever the blessed Jesus has reigned, by his word and spirit ; wherever (to use the language of this psalm,) he has ** come down like rain upon the mown grass;" — there the righteous have flourished, and abundance of blessed peace has been enjoyed. They that dwell in the wilderness, and in the new settlements, have bowed before him, and his enemies have been confounded ; yea, kings and emperors have fallen down before him, and have become nursing fathers to his church Jesns has de- livered the needy when he cried, the poor also, and him that had none to help liim. He has spared the poor 198 and needy, and saved the souls of the needy : he has redeemed their soul from deceit and violence, and precious has their blood been in his sight. Our Re- deemer shall live for ever and ever : prayer also shall be made not only to him, but for him, and for the in- crease and perpetuity of his kingdom ; and eternally shall he be praised by the celestial hierarchy, and by all his redeemed ones. Yea, of him only can it be said, with strict propriety, as in verse 17^ that his name shall endure for ever — that his name shall be eontinued as long as the sun — and that all nations shall call him blessed. — The preceding quotations and observations prepare the way for one remark, which the author here makes once for all, viz. : Many, perhaps most parts of the Psalms, have a two-fold meaning — a literal, and a spiritual or mystical one. The truth of this position, and its importance as it res- pects us, Grentiles, bishop Home has ingeniously illus- trated, in the preface to his excellent ^' Commentary on the Book of Psalms'' : and it should be carefully remembered by all such as wish to enter into the true spirit of this most precious part of the sacred writings. As we have attended to the views which David had of the Messiah, and to the description he gave of his glorious reign on earth, about one thousand years before his incarnation, — it may be amusing to hear also, what Maimonidee, a noted Jewish wri- ter, of modern times, has to say on this subject : "As to the days of the Messiah," says he, " they are the time when the kingdom shall be restored to Israel, and they shall return to Palestine. And this king shall be potent, the metropolis of whose kingdom shall be Zion ; and his name shall be- famous to the uttermost parts of the earth. He shall be greater 1»9 than SolomoHy and with liim shall all the nations make peace, and yield him ohedience, because of his justice aed tljc miracles tliat he shall perform. If any one shall rise ai;ainst him, God ehall give him up into his hand, to be destroyed. All the scripture declares his hap- piness, and tlie happiness we shall have by him. How- beit, nothing in the nature of things shall he changed, only Israel shall have the kingdom ; for so our wise men say expressly. There is no difference between these days and the days of the Messiah, but onlj the subduing the nations under us. The Messiah shall die, and his son, and his son's son shall reign after him, but his kingdom shall endure long, and men shall live long in those days. But the days of the Messiah are not so much to be desired that we may have store of corn and wealth, but for the socie- ty and conversation of good men." — See Owen, on the Hebrews, vol. 1. p. 180. O what "blindness, in part, still happens to Israel 1" Still are the majori- ty of the Jews tenacious of these two points relative to the Messiali — that he is yet to come, and that hir kingdom is to bo temporal and a worldly kingdom. Ps. cxxix. 6. ^^ Let them be as the grass upoa the house tops, which withereth afore it groweth up." — The houses of the Jews, as has been already ob- served, had flat roofs. On these was a plaister of ter- race. On this some grass grew ; but as it had " no deepness of earth," and was exposed to the scorching rays of an almost vertical sun, it soon withered away. Thus transient, the psalmist tells us, is the prosperity of all such as hate Ziou. How impressive the illus^ tration ! soo ISAIAH. Chap. xix. 1. " Behold the Lord rideth upon a swift cloud, and shall come into Egypt ; and the idols of Egypt shall be moved at his presence, and the heart of Egypt shall melt in the midst of it." — From what follows in this chapter, it appears that this verse may have some reference to the effects of those terrible in- vasions on Egypt, which were afterwards made by Sennacherib, Nebuchadnezzar, Cambyses, and Alex- ander, in succession. Such invasions might be prop- erly represented by Jehovah's coming into Egypt, as all those ravagers of that country were only the instru- ments of his indignation against its inhabitants, and their idols. But this prediction is applicable to, and received a still more literal and signal fulfilment on, another occasion. It should be remembered, that the Egyptians were very superstitious, and worshipped numerous idols. Among the rest, as we learn from Rollings ancient history, two were universally adored. These were, Osiris and Isis, which were thought to be the sun and moon. Besides these, they worshipped a great number of beasts ; such as the ox, dog, wolf, hawk, crocodile, stork, cat, &c. and ascribed divinity even to the pulse and roots in gardens. Of all the brute acimals to which the Egyptians paid religious adoration, the bull Apis was the most famous, and the most devoutly worshipped. Magnificent temples were erected to him ; and when he died, Egypt went into a general mourning. The funeral parade at the burial of this animal, cost eleven thousand pounds sterling. Eusebius relates, that when Joseph and Mary, with SOI the child Jesus, fled into Egypt, (Mat. ii. 34,) and took up their abode in Hermopolis, immediately their great idol, and the dii minores, i. e. the smaller dei- ties of their temple, fell prostrate. To this remarkable event, then, the passage before us may more immedi. ately refer. Chap. xlv. 1 — 7. '* Thus saith the Lord to his anointed, to Cyrus, whose right hand I have holden to subdue nations before him ; and I will loose the loins of kings, to open before him the two-leaved gates, and the gates shall not be shut. I will go before thee, and make the crooked places straight ; I will break in pieces the gates of brass, and cut in sunder the bars of iron. And I will give thee the treasures of darkness, and hidden riches of secret places, that thou mayest know that I the Lord, which call thee by thy name am the God of Israel. For Jacob my ser- vant's sake, and Israel mine elect, 1 have even called thee by thy name : I have surnamed thee, though thou hast not known me. That they may know from the rising of the sun and from the west, that there is none besides me : I am the Lord and there is none else. I form the light, and create darkness : I make peace, and create evil : I the Lord do all these things." — The discussion of scriptural prophecies, and illustration of their fulfilment, were not included in the original plan of the author. But as there is something peculiar in these predictions relative to Cyrus, and as an explana- tion of the whole paragraph cannot fail of being inter- esting to common readers, as well as prepare the way for their understanding the seventh verse, it seems proper for him to devote a little time and labor to this Dd subject. — Cyrus, the personage here addressed, and called by name, was the son of Cambyses, king of Persia, and of Mandana, daughter of Astyages, king of Media. Though for an heathen remarkably hu- mane, and amiable in his disposition, he was at the same time formidable in arras, and almost always suc- cessful in his military expeditions. In the early part of life he signalized himself, by compelling Armenia to pay to Media her promised, but afterwards refuseil tribute, by taking Sardis, capital of Lydia, and by routing and overthrowing, with an army of one hun- dred and ninety-six thousand men, the army of Croe- sus, consisting of four hundred and twenty thousand. But his most glorious exploit was still to be achieved. In the counsels of heaven it was ordained that he should be the instrument of carrying fire and sword, and destruction, into the very heart of that nation, by whom the chosen people of God had been so con- stantly hated, and so frequently distressed. And He who ^^ calleth things that be not as though they were," here calleth upon him by name, nearly two hundred years before he was born, and commissioneth him, as his anointed one, to execute the purposes of his indig- nation against Babylon. And here let us pause for a moment, and reflect — how improbable, in a human view, it was, that " Babylon, the glory of kingdoms? the beauty of the Chaldee's excellency," (ch. xiii. 9,) could ever be taken by any human stratagem or power ! According to Rollin, this city had been of very long standing, for it was founded by Nimrod, the great grand -son of Noah, two thousand six hundred and forty years before Christ. By the daily influx of the treasures of the east, through the river Euphrates^ ^3 which ran under its walls, and through the city, and by tlie continual increase of inhabitants — it had be- come immensely rich and populous. Add to this — it was surrounded by a wall 350 feet high and 87 feet broad. This wall inclosed the citv in the form of an exact square : each side of the square was fifteen miles in length. In each of these sides were twenty- five brazen gates : Hence the mean- ing of the expressions, " opening before him (Cyrus) the two-leaved gates, and breaking in pieces the gates of brass.'' In fine, this city had become, as it were, tiie metropolis of the world, and seemed to bid defiance to any power short of omnipotence. But before the Lord's anointed, this great mountain Was soon to become a plain ! Formidable as it was, Herodotus and Xenophon, two authentic historians, inform us of its capture, and of the means by which it was accomplished. Their relation is to this effect : Cyrus, in view of the city, despairing of taking it by siege or storm, resolved to make the attempt by strata- gem. Accordingly, on a certain night, when Bel- shazzer, with his lords, was to have a great feast, he diverted the course of the river Euphrates, into a channel which had been previously cut by the kings of Babylon, to receive its waters in times of inunda- tion ; and then immediately marched up with his army on the dry bed of the old channel, under the walls, and thus became master of the city at once, and without difficulty. These same historians inform us, that after he and his army had actually gotten into the bed of the river, they might have been captured there, as in a net, if the brazen gates, which conduct- ed frou\ the streets to the river, had not that night 204 been providentially left open. But, in consequence of revelling and intoxication, the infatuated people had forgotten or neglected to shut them. The unsus- pected appearance of the Persian army in their capi- tal, filled the minds of the Babylonians with terror, and immediately excited such a tumult, that the gates of the royal palace were by the king's order opened, to inquire what the matter was. And thus, by a won- derful management of providence, was the way imme- diately prepared for Cyrus to take Belshazzer himself, and all his lords prisoners. The same night was Belshazzer put to death. (See Dan. v. 30.) Thus, with wonderful precision, was the prediction fulfilled, <* t will loose tlie loins of kings, to open before him the two-leaved gates ; and the gates shall not be shut." No less precise and wonderful was the fulfilment of the prediction in verse 3, viz. ^^ I will give thee the treasures of darkness, and hidden riches of secret places." For the before mentioned historians affirm, that the treasures which Cyrus found there and in Sardis, amounted to one hundred and twenty-six million, two hun,) would not, we must suppose, neglect an at- tention to tiie spiritual interests of Cyrus. It is sup- posed, accordiui^ly, that among other things Daniel did, he showed to Cyrus the prophecies respecting him. That Cyrus became afterwards acquainted, in some measure, with the God of Israel, is manifest from his proclamation for the return of the Jews, which is recorded in the first chapter of Ezra. Read, particularly, the 2d and 3d verses. See his acknowl- edgment, verse 3, " He is the God.'^ The preceding remarks may help us to understand the true meaning of verse 7 — " I form the light, and create darkness : I make peace, and create evil : I S06 the Lord do all tUesc tljings." It must be remember- ed that Cyrus was a Persian. The doctrine of the Magi, who were the moral and religious instructors of that nation;, was, that there were two supreme beings : one, the author of all good — the other, the author of all evil. Light and darkness, peace and evil, are generic terms, denoting, summarily, good find evil of all kinds. Now the direct and principal design of this declaration of Jehovah to Cyrus, ap- pears to have been, to refute the above mentioned doctrine — a doctrine, in the belief of which he, (Cyrus) of course, had been educated ; and to show, in oppo- sition to the sentiment of his countrymen, that there was only one supreme Being, (and evidently, in gtrictjpropriety, only one can be supreme,) — that light and darkness were alike formed, and peace and evil alike created, by Him alone. When, however, it is added, " I the Lord do all these things," we are not to suppose that He doth evil, in the usual sense of the phrase. " Far be it from God," says Elihu, ^^ that he should do wickedness, and from the Almigh- ty that he should commit iniquity." Doing wicked- ness, and committing iniquity, signify the same thing : but to ascribe either of these to our Creator, in the usual sense of such expressions, is direct blasphemy. The general import of this declaration of Jehovah to Cyrus, is, that there are not two supreme Beings, as Cyrus and his countrymen had imagined ; that He only hath supreme control, and that all events aie directed by his providential agency. Chap. liii. 3. '^ — and we hid as it were our faces from him" ; or exactly thus, ^^ he hid as it were «07 his face from us." For in the Hebrew, the word translated '' we hid," is what we should call in Eng^ lish, an active participle, in the past tense, singular number; and the pronoun or final word of the clause is, in that language, in the first pLison plural. The mean- ing of the declaration, that Jesus Christ in his last suf- ferings, hid, or rather of the prediction, that he would hide his face from us, must be, either that he then had or would have, his human face as it were, covered, and thus hid, in token of his bearing our guilt (according to the prescriptions of the law) ; or that he then veiled or would veil, conceal, hide his divine glory from us.— And as both these sentiments are true in the abstract, so, perhaps, both were meant to be simultaneously ex- pressed in this passage. Chap. liii. 8. '* He was taken from prison and from judgment.'' — If the word prison must be retain, ed in our version, some other meaning than the com- mon one should, evidently, be annexed to it. For in what prison was our Lord ever confined, and from what one was he ever taken? Surely, in his biography, as given by the evangelists, we meet with nothing which can furnisli any re^dy to either of these inquir- ies. We read that the apostles were imprisoned (Acts v. 18), and tMR Peter was put in prison (ch. xii. 4») 5 but no where in the history of Jesus Christ, do we read of any such thing respecting him. The word MATSAR, rendered from prison, is a noun, derived from a verb which signifies, to restrain. As here used, it seems to denote civil restraint, authority, or magistracy. The Hebrew prefix, or first letter of the word, signi* fies, sometimes^ bif as well as from. Judgment, de- SOS notes judicial trial. Accordingly, bishop Lowth, m his admirable translation of Isaiah, renders the pas. sage thus : " By an oppressive judgment was he tak- en off." ERRATA. p. 17, I. 8 from top, for instance, rea.d "observe." P. 18, I. 11 from top, for meshomum, read ** ineshomeem." P. 22, I. 10 from top. for maketh, read " worketh." P. 33, I. 5 from top, for wisely, read " rightly." P. 107, I. 3 from bottom, for other, read " former." P. 132, 1. 9 from bottom, for Hadash, read "Kadash." P. 157, I. 2 from top, for become, read '* became." P. 159, I. 1 from top, fov forbid, read " forbade." P. 178, 1. 5 from bottom, for between the time, read "from the time, P. 180, J. 10 from bottom, for the language, read " that language." NOTE. — Since the foregoing work has come from the press, the au- thor has noticed some inaccuracies wilb regard to punctuation. — He perceives, also, that in several instances be has not t*een sufficiently careful to distinguish as emphatical, certain words, which the intelli- gent and attentive reader will instantly see to be such. But as these deficiencies cannot aflect the general character of the work, and may be easily supplied by the discerning reader, he hopes to find bis excuse in the candor of bis brethren ; especially in the candor of those of tliem for whom, according to the remark in the preface^be preceding work bias been principally intended. ^ OTHER ERRATA r. 23, \i 16 from top, for actual, read "correct.*' P. 54, I. 16 from bottom, for derivations, read "derivatives.'^ l\ .'JG, I. 4 Irom bottom, for mere curiosity, read " the nwte Cbriosit^i*' P. 166, top I. for then, read " there." P. 172. I. 15 from bottom, for in supposition, read "on su^poiitlbtii'* P. 181, 1. 12 from top, insert " viz." between the words daughter and aii CONTRAST BECWEEN CALVINISM HOPKINSIANISM< •«ww*>— — BY EZRA STALES ELY, A. M. STATED PREACHER TO THE HOSPITAL AND ALMSHOUSE m THE CITY OF MEW-YORK. «»«»»<*.'^r#»©» Earnettljr contend for the faith which wat once delivered unto the taint?, Prove all things : bold fast that which ii good. JVETTrORX' PUBLISHED BY 8. WHITING AND CO. TBEObOClCAL AND CLASSICAL BOOKSELLEBS, 96 BROADWAY. PaiU a Thomas, Printtri. 1811. District of JWw-For/t, ss. «•««««« BE I r REMEMBERED, That on the twenty-second day of April, in the thirty-fiftii * . _ J year of the Independence of ihe United Slates ot America. Ezra Stiles Ely, ot the ♦ ■ • said district, hath deposited in this ofl&ce the title of a book, the right whereof he »»»*»»* claims as author, in the words and fi|;ures following, to wit : " A Contract between Calvinism and llopkinsiamsm. By Ezra Stiles Efy, A. M. Slated Preacher to the Hospital and Almshouse in the City of New-York. Earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints. Pn.ve all things : hold fast that which is good " In conformity to ihe Act ot the Congress of the United Slates, entitled " An Act for the en- couragement of learning, by securing the copies of Maps, Charts and Books to tlie authors and proprietors ot such copies, during the time therein mentioned." And also to an Act, entitled "An Act, supplementary to an Act. entitled an Act tor the encouragement of learning, by securing the copies of Maps, Charts, and Books, to the authors ani proprietors of such copies, during the time therein mentioned, and extending the benefits thereof to the arts of designing, engraving, and etching bistotical and other prints." CHARLES CLINTON, Clerk of the District of New-York. CONTENTS- X HE Introduction 3 CnAPTEH I. Of divine revelation io II. Of God 14 III. Of the divine decrees 34 IV. Of Creation 32 V. Of Providence 36 VI. Of moral law, obligation, action and cha- racter 40 Note A. Of the origin of law 53 Note B. Of natural and moral ability . . 53 VII. Of divine providence, in relation to the origin of evil, and reprobation 56 VIII. Of the apostacy and its consequences. . . 66 IX. Of atonement and justification 84 Note A. A general view of the contro- versy about the atonement 103 Note B. A discourse in favour of an in- definite atonement 109 Note C. A critique on the foregoing ser- mon 116 X. Of effectual calling 128 Note A. On the application of redemp- tion 138 Note B. On the means of grace accord- ing to the Calvinistic system 140 Note C. On the • Arminian tendency of Hopkinsianism IS/J CONTENTS, Page. Chap. XI. Of the Christian graces 172 NoTii A. On the love of being in gene- ral 192 Note B. All the Christian graces reduced to love, according to the Hopkinsian prin- ciplts 19S Note C. The Christian graces distin- guished: by a Calvinist 2l4 Note D. A Calvinistic disquisition on disinterested benevolence 221 XII. or Sanclificittion 226 Note A. On the imperfection of good men 232 XIII. Calvinism and Hopkinsianism contrasted by comparing each with several heresies . 255 XIV. The Conclusion 27H THE INTRODUCTION. •- *' About forty years ago," saitlDr. Hopkins, in 1796 ; "there were buL few, pcrluips not more tlun four or five, who espoused the sentiments, which have since been culled lidwardean, and new divinity^ and since, after some improvement was made upon them, H'jfikintonian and Hofikinsian sentiments. But these sen- timents hdve so spread since that time among ministers, espe- cially those who have sii.ce come on the stage, that there are now more than one hundred in the ministry who espouse the same sentiments in the United States of America. And the number appears to be fast increasing, and these sentiments appear to be cominj; more and more ijito credit, and arc belter ujidttrsiood, and the ostium which was cast on them and those who preached them, is greatly subsided." " Thus I am become the head of a denomination, who have since greatly increased, and in which thousands are included, and a lai'ge number of ministers, who, I believe are the most sound, consistent and thoroU)^h Caivinists; and who in general sustain as good a character, uS to their morality, preaching and personal religion, as any set of clergymen whatever : and are most popu- lar where there appears to be most attention to religion : and at the same time, are most liated, opposed and spoken against, by Arminians, Deists, and persons wim .^ppcur to have no religion. And I believe, though this denomination or name originated from no such design, that it has proved an advantage to truth and true religion, as it has given opportunity and been the occasion of collecting those who embrace the scheme of Christianity ex- hiluicd in the forcmentioned publications, [ti»e works of Presi- dent Edwards, Dr. Bellamy, ami Dr. West of Siockbridgc] .nd ranking them under one standard. It has excited liic aticniioa IV INTRODUCTION. and promoted inquiry into the principles and doctrines which are embraced and held by those of this denomination, by which light and conviction have been spread and propagated." Life of Hofikina,fi. 102, 103,97,98. In this manner Dr. Hopkins congratulated himself on the use of his name, which was first intended for reproach ; but which is now deemed by many more honourable than any other of hu- man invention. Let it not be imagined, therefore, that the au- thor of the following Contrast designs any opprobrium, when he uses the word Ho/ikinsianisjn., to denote that system of doc- trine whose foundation was laid by President Edwards, whose superstructure was principally reared by Dr Samuel Hopkins of Newport in Rhode-Island ; and whose last stone has been carried up by a multitude, shouting, *' grace, grace, unto it." President Edwards, however, never once imagined, that such a fabric as Hopkinsianism now is, would be reared upon his cor- ner stone of "love to being in general." Neither did Dr. Bella- my conceive of the system, which has been builded on the foun- dation which he assisted to lay. That gentleman and scholar, Dr. West, now venerable for age as well as piety, has lived to Avitness the improvements made by his learned friends Dr. Sam- uel Spring of Newburyport, Dr. Nathanael Emmons of Frank- lin in Massachusetts, and many younger divines. He has lived to assist, with his own hand, in the consummation. It has often been demanded, " what is Hopkinsianism ? What is Calvinism ?" Many think them the same thing. Dr. Hopkins calls his system strict Calvinis7n ;* Dr. Emmons affirms that his refinements arc Calvinism ;t and Dr. Spring, the Rev. Thomas Williams of Providence, with many other Hopkinsians, believe, that their sentiments are the most thrifty and prolific sprouts of Calvinism. " It is evident that Hopkinsian sentiments are only the genur ine, flourishing, and fruitful branches of the Calvinistic tree." " There is no more difference between Calvinists and Hopkin- « Hop. 21 Ser, p. 362, 364. f Emmons' Scr. p. 374- INTROIMJCTION. V kians, than there is between a tree and its branches, or between first principles and their consequences. The broad foundation which supports our ample superstructure was lon|^ since deep- ly and most firmly laid in the first principles of Calvinism." " I challenge him, (Dr. Tappan,) to fetch a. single article from the first principles of Calvinism, which clashes with my theory.* Within the bounds of the Presbyterian Church of the United States, there are also many, who support either wholly or par- tially, the system of Hopkins, and who call themselves Calvin- ists. If, however, there is no important difference of sentiment, between the persons, who are called by these two names, why should there be any distinction of appellation ? If the two sys- tems harmonize, all should be called after the Rev. John Cal- vin, or after Samuel Hopkins, d. d. his American successor in the chair of theology. The teachers of religion should also use the same language, on all important and disputable subjects ; that " the hearers of the word" may not imagine a difference of opinion, where the theory is the same. What, then, is the difference between Calvinism and Hopkin- sianism ? With a desire of being able to answer this question, and of assisting the candid inquirer in his researches after truth, the author of this work has arranged the peculiarities of each system over against those of the other. When stating the opinions of others, the writer has made use of their language, as nearly as possible, either by quoting them • Spring's Diquisitions, p. 47, 48. It is not the design of the author to accept tliis challenge, in behalf of the amiable Dr. Tappan, whose memo- ry is precious to those who knew him best ; but the above passage was in- tfoduced to show how sincerely and firmly one, who stands second, if not first on the list of able and pious Hopkinsians, could assert the Calvinism of his tlieory. It will not even be insinuated, that Dr. Tappan was or was not a Calvinist. He considered himself one ; but, in relation to the main doctrine of his controversy concerning the means of gi'ace, most Calvinists will allow that Dr. Spring had the right side^ and proved himself the strongest in artrnment. VI INTRODUCTION. verbatim, or by givinc? an epitome of their sentiments, in their own expressions. To avoid the charge of miorepresentation, when any author is quoted, his anci; nt modo of spelling, and even his ungrainmatical construction of sentences, have been re- tained. Lest it should be thought that the v/riter translated the works of Calvin and Wltsius to suit his own purpose, he baa used Norton's translation of the "Institution," and the common tendering of the " Economy of the Covenants." The quota- tions from " Witsii Exercitationes in Symbolum" were neces- sarily rendered into English, by the writer, because he could find no translation of that work. In the first column of the Contrast may be found the doctrines of Calvin ; in the second, the collateral doctrines of ancient L>nd modern confessions, or of distinguished individuals of the Ctd- vinistic school : in the third the opinions oi Hopkins, chitfljr extracted from his System of Divinity : aiul in the tourth, the collateral propositions or reasonings of some of tlie most c^ble writers, who call themselves, and are culled, Hopkiiisiaiis. Cal- vin and his followers are arranged on the first page ; and on the next page, in opposing ranks, stand Hopkins and his adherents. Instead of the publications of individuals, confeskions of Hop- kinsian churches would have been introduced, had any such pub- lic standards been found. These churches arc conmioniy of the congregational order, and almost every pastor, if he dislikes the form of his predecessor, by the consent of his people, forms for himself a short confession of faith, to be used in the admission of persons to sealing ordinances. It is not pretended, that all the ancient confessions, which are introduced into this* work, are orthodox in all points. It is suf- ficient that they are Calvinisliciil upon the subjects, concerning which there is a debate between the friends of Calvin and Hop- kins. One principal design in taking copious extracts from them, was, by exhibiting a harmony of public standards of faith, to show the extensive spread of Calvinism, and the general agreement of all the reformed churches, in all the leading doc- trines of Christianity. To those who cannot procure these Con- fessions, it is hoped that this work will prove not only a contrast INTROPrCTTON. Vll between truth and error, but a valuable harmony of public stan- dards ot doctrine. So far as it was practicable, the work has been divided, not on- ly into chapters, but sections, that the heads of agreement or op- position, might be easily distinguished. The heads of agree- ment^ which have found a place here, were necessary to give a connected view of each system Without an exhibition of some fundamental principles, which both pirties admit, and from ■which one or the other wanders, it would be difficult to oppose any thing more than fragments of systems. At the bottom of many pages the reader will find explanatory notes, and at the end of the chapters, long notes, which will give him a general view of the mode of reasoning which is adopted by the oppo- nents. Since the notes are some of them founded upon the Cal- vinistical system, and some of them on the Hopkinsian theory, they will tend to make the contrast more complete. It is proper here, to state, that no personal reflections are in- tended, and that the gentlemen whose works may be thought to buficr by the contrast arc distinguished for talents and piety. It will not follow, however, that thty may iiot be erroneous ; or that John Calvin, who published his Institution, when only twenty- five years of age, was not in the vigour of youth, more scriptu- ral in doctrine than they. No disrespect is intended by the au- thor, when he says, in the language of Eiihu, whose words were not censured by the Holy One, " great men are not always wise, neither do the aged understand judgment." He would render to each his due ; and he knows that while they are opposed, they are to be respected No individual of them is charged with supporting every doctrine which appears under the caption of Hopkinsianism ; nor is the Saint of Newport made answerable for the metaphysical speculations which have taken their origin from his writings. Hopkins would have recoiled from what ia now considered the perfection of his system. In like manner, many divines who maintain one or two principles of Hopkinsian- ism, utterly disclaim the body of divinity with which these mem- bers are connected. At the same time, it is believed, that the first principles of Hopkinsianism being granted, he who would be consistent with himself, must subscribe to the Bentimeuis of Vm INTRODUCTION. the Massachusetts Missionary Magazine before it was united ■with the Panoplist, and acknowledge Dr. Emmons to be the prince of philosophers. Most reasoners do not admit all the legitimate inferences which might be drawn from their own premises. It is well they do not. The writer has no disposition to accuse those persons, whose errors arc opposed, of wilfully dishonouring God and his testimony of grace. Neither would he attribute to them the inferences which they disclaim. When one of the sume school, however, has taken the principles of a former writer, and openly avowed the inductions to be legitimate ; we may say, that the foundation and superstructure, in our opinion, correspond ; while one must answer for laying the corner stone, and the other, for what he has built on it. Should any class of men say, that they are impeached in the following work ; the writer has forewarned them that he has simply charged to individuals what they have individually writ- ten. If any writer has been misrepresented, it will be a matter of regret to the author, when convinced of the fact ; and he pledges himself to make, so far as possible, reparation. For the doctrines which are approved in this work, the author holds himself accountable to the ecclesiastical judicatories of the church to which he belongs. If any sentiment is supported, or any doctrine condemned, contrary to the Presbyterian Stan- dards, he refuses not to answer for his writings, and abide the de- cision of those brethi'en to whom he is bound to submit in the -Lord. The whole work is committed to the public, with an earnest wish that it may prove beneficial to all who shall read it ; and es- pecially to those who think themselves either Calvinists or Hop- kinsians, while they understand neither one system nor the other. CONTRAST, BETWEEN CALVINISM AND HOPKIISSIANISJM. 10 CALVINISM. CHAPTER I. OF mVLYE REVELATIOjY. CALVIN, AND OTHERS. 1. God reveals to all mo- 1. The same doctrine is ral agents, in some manner, taught in the Con. P. C. U. S. so much knowledge of him- Con. C. Scot, and Say. Plat. ch. self and their duty as to ren- 1. sec. 1.* Con. R, D. C. Art. 2. der them inexcusable for their and of the Protestant French sins. churches, J. £>. \ 559. Calvin's Institution, Book 1. ch. 3, passim. 2. " To attain to God the 2. A revelation is necessary- Creator, it is needful to have to give that knowledge of God, the scripture to be our guide." and of his will, which is essen- " Therefore not in vain he hath tial to salvation. added the light of his word. Con. P. C. U. S./i. 1. Con.R. that thereby he might be known B. C,Jrt.2. Say. Plat. fi. 13. to salvation." and Con. C. Scot. ch. 1. sec. 1. Inst. B. I. ch. 6. sec. 1. 3. The commonly received 3. The same doctrine is books of the Old and New Tes- taught in the Con. P. C. U. S. * The characters Con. P. C. U. S. are used for the Confession of the- Presbyterian Church in the United States of America : Con. C. Scot, for the Confession of the Church of Scotland, composed by the Assembly of Divines at Westminster, A. D. 1643, and approved by the General As- sembly of the Church of Scotland, A. D. 1647 ; which is now the standard, so far as the articles of faith are concerned, of all the different denomina- tions of Scotch churches in America. Say. Plat, denote the confession of faith, called the Saybrook Platform, which was adopted by the churches in Connecticut, in New-England, A. D. 1708, printed 1710, and re-printed under the inspection of the General Association, in 1810. This was a copy of the Savoy Confession, which was adopted, by a general synod, convened in Boston, A. D. 1680. The Westminster Confession had been previously assented to, in 1648, by the unanimous vote of the Elders and Messengers, from the churches in Massachusetts, convened in Cambridge. Con. R. D. C. signify the Confession of the Reformed Dutch Churches, which was adopted by the Synod of Dortrecht, in 1619, and is now the standard of the Reformed Dutch Churches in America. HOPKINSIANISM. 11 CHAPTER I. OF JDIVIJ^E REVELATIOX. HOPKINS) AND OTHERS. 1. It appears from the' 5 1,52, ^5* 53 /laffes, Vol. 1, o/ Hofikins* 'JSt/stem of Divinity, that he was of the same opinion. 2. " If mankind were with- out all the light and advantages of a revelation, and traditions which originate from it, they would not pay any regard to an invisible, supreme being, or en- tertain any belief, or notion of such a being; but would in every sense, " live without God in the world.'* St/at. Vol. I. /I. 55. 3. Dr. Hopkins proves the same scriptures to be divine, from the credibility of the pen- 1. « The bare light of nature discovers only the supremacy of the Creator, and the depend- ence of creatures." Emmons* Ser.fi. 27.* 2. The essential difference between virtue and vice may be known by those who are wholly ignorant of God." Emmons, fi.6i. " Men are capable of judging what is right or wrong, in re- spect to the divine character and conduct." Emmons, fi. 65. " Moral subjects as irresist- ibly obtrude upon the con- science, as visible objects do upon the eye. And a man can no more avoid seeing and be- lieving moral truths, than he • In all the quotations from Emmom, reference is made to lus volume of sermons, " On some of the first principles and doctrines of true reli- gion," printed at Wrentham, Massachusetts, A. D. 1800. It will be found upon a careful examination of Uie following pages, that Dr. Emmons is strictly Hopkinsian in most of his sentiments. He has taken the leading doctrines, which are exhibited in the system, for his guide in matters of faith ; and undauntedly pursued them, regardless of consequences. What Dr. Hopkins commenced, he has carried to perfection ; and what that excellent man taught confusedly, he has inculcated in language too plain to be misunderstood. Of the two writers, the one of Franklin is certainly to be preferred, because he is more systematical in his arrangements, more thorough in his investigations, and more precise in his language, than the •ne of Newport. Dr. Emrmons is a metaphysician who does not flinch ! 12 CALVINISM. CALVIN, a: laments are the word of God, which was written under thp plenary inspiration of the Holy- Ghost ; and which is proved to be of divine origin, by the an- tiquity, dignity, unity and ex- cellence of the writings ; by the integrity of the writers, mi- racles, prophecy, history, and TTiore especially by the inward testimony of the spirit. Inst. B. \. ch.T and 8, 4. The scriptures are the on- ly rule of faith and practice. !15y them we are to try every spirit. " The Spirit of Christ is given, not to guide men with- 9ut the scripture, but accord- ing to the scripture." The Spi- rit and the written word must *^ go hand in hand." Inst.B. l.ch.9* rD OTHERS* fi. 4 and 5. Say. Plat. fi. 1 5. Cjo/j. C. Scot. fi. 28 and 29. Con. /?. D. C. Art. 3, 4, 5 and 6. Also, in the Confessions of the Ger- man Protestants in the city of Auspurgc^A. D. 1530, of Easily in 1532, of th^ Waldenses in 1532, of Helvetia in 1566, qf France m 1559, and oftheJEn^- lish Church in 1562, See « An Harmony of Confessions, print- ed in London, A. D. 1 643. 4. " The whole counsel of God, concerning all things ne- cessary for his own glory, man's salvation, faith and life, is either expressly set down in scripture, or by good and necessaiy con- sequence, may be deduced fron^ scripture." Con. P. C. U. S.fi. 6. Con. C. Scot. /i. 30. Say. Plat. fi. 16. Con. R. D. C. Art. 5. And all the ancient Protestant Confes- sions. * Much is said by the Hopkinsians, about the right eiJicl 'lurong in the nature of things ; but Calvin considered the command of God to be the only foundation of right. His sentiments appear to have been the same with those expressed by that disting'uished philologist, John Horne TooKE, in his "Diversions of Purley." "Right," he says, "is no other than RECT-um, (regitum) the past participle of the Latin verb regere" from rego, to rule. Hence right signifies, that •which is ruled or ordered. *' Thus, when a man demands liis right ; he asks only for that which it is ordered he sliall have. A right conduct is that which is ordered." " The right road is, that ordered or directed to be pursued (for the object you have in view ) To do right is, to do that which is ordered to be done. To be in the right is, to be in such situation or circumstances as are ordered." In n religious view, therefore, that alone is right, which God has ordered us to perform. How then, can any pretend that the nature of things constitutes ^ght and wrong ? So for as the nature of things reveals what God has HOPONSIANISM. 1^ HOPKINS, AND bTItERS. men, profane history, miracles, can avoid seeing natural objects, prophecy, the light which the when both are placed before Old and New Testaments re- his mind with equal plainness." fleet on each other, the care of Emmonsffi. 77. Jews and Christians to preserve 3. "The divine Spirit sug- Uie sacred writings, the harmo- gested every word and thought ny which subsists between all to the holy penmen." the parts, and the Godlike con- j^mmona* Ser. 2* tents of the whole volume. Syst. Vol. \,Part. \.ch.\.. 4. " This is a complete, un- 4. There is an essential dif- erring and perfect rule of faith ference between right and wrong and practice, and the only rule, in the nature of things, which This being understood and be- does not depend upon the di- lieved,is sufficient to make men vine will, which God cannot de- wise unto salvation ; and we stroy without destroying the have no warrant to believe any nature of things ; and which religious truth, unless it be re- all moral agents are capable of vealed, or can be supported by discerning without a revelation: the Holy Scriptures; and this therefore, " there is a propriety is the only rule of our duty." in every man's judging for him- Syttem^ Vol. \.ft.45. self in matters of morality and religion." Emmons* Ser. 3. enjoined upon man, so far it exhibits the difference between right and wrong, which are entirely dependent on the will of God. When we apply right to God, we cannot intend that he has a superior, or is commanded by the nature of his creatures. We say, " God has a right, and God is right, or mcHT-eout." We intend, that he might with proprifety act upon such moral principles as he has commanded us to regard ; or that his dealings are analogous to those which he has enjoined upon his rational creatures. He is right or -RiCHr-eous, when he acts according to his own ruie. His perfections may also be said, fig^atively, to require, or comm,and a cer- tain course of conduct ; and in this sense, tlie attributes of Jehovah are to him the rule of right. " Shall not the judge of all tlie earth do right ?" Will not God speak the truth, fulfil his promises, and do good ? Will he not obey the laws prescribed by his own character ? Will he not conform to those moral rules, by which he has required his offspring to regulate tiieir conduct ? ^\ . 14 CALVINISM. CALVIN, AND OTHERS, 5. The natural powers of the mind, as well as the affections of the heart are so corrupted, that men cannot savingly under- stand the scriptures without a divine illumination of the un- derstanding, as well as a !reno- vation of the heart. Inst. B. 1 . chafi. 4, 5, 6. 6. It is our crime, that " we want natural power," to " climb up unto the pure and clear know- ledge of God," by the reading of the scriptures. Inst. B. \, ch. 5. sec. 14. 7.The written revelation is now completed, and other re ve- Ia;tions are not to be expected. Inst. B. 1. c/i.9. 5. The same doctrine is taught, in the Con. C. Scot. ch. I. sec. 6. and ch. 10. sec. 1. Say. Plat. p. 16 and 41. Con. P. C. U. S. fi. 7, 54, 199 and 349. Con. R. D. C. Canon 3. Art. 1. The latter confession of Hel- vetia teaches, that the under- standing has suffered such a depravation as to render illumi- nation necessary to the discern- ment of divine truth. 6. By " a due use of the or- dinary means," the learned and the unlearned might obtain a sufficient understanding of the scriptures. Con. C. Scot. ch. 1. sec. 7. Con. P. C. U. S.p. 8. Say. Plat.. fi. 17. 7. The confessions say the same. Con. C. Scot. ch. 1 . sec. 6. Say. Plat. fi. 16. Con. P. C. U. S.fi. &and7. CHAPTER IL OF GOD. CALVIIf, AND OTHERS. 1. " There is one indivisible 1. There is but one only, liv- divine essence, which is unbe- ing and true God, say all con- gotten, absolutely of itself and fessions. That there is a God without beginning." we know by the creation, pre- Inst. B.\. ch. \2i.sec.2S. servation and government of HOPKINSIANISM. IS HOPKIKS, AND OTHERS. 5. Men are under no natural or menfaZ incapacity of savingly understanding the scriptures : they merely want a right disfio- 9ition of heart to discern what they are perfectly able to un- derstand. Sy at. Part \.ch.\. and Part 2. ch. 4. 6. It is our crime, that" we do not savingly understand the scriptures, because we have the natural ability, but want the dis- position. Sy a tern J Part \,ch. 1 . 7. The same says Dr. Hop- kins : 5. " The Pagans, and even little children know the nature of virtue and vice, and are able to perceive the essential differ- ence between truth and false- hood, justice and injustice, kindness and unkindness, obe- dience and disobedience, as well as their parents, or any other persons, who are ac- quainted with God and the re- velation of his will." JSmmonsj fi. 64. 6. Men are criminal for not understanding' the word of God ; because it is an exhibition of the difference of right and wrong in the nature of things, which difference they have na- turalconscience to perceive. Emmons' Ser.jiassimi 7. And Dr. Emmons, the same. CHAPTER II. OF GOD. HOPKINS, AND OTHERS. * r. That there is one uncrea- 1. " The bare possibility of ted, eternal God, may be pro- the world's beginning to exist, ved, from the existence of our- amounts to a demonstration, selves and other things; from that it did begin to exist; and tlie manner of our own exist- the bare possibility of its be- ence^dofother visible things J ginning to exist, by a cause. 16 CALVINISM. CALVIN, AND OTHERS. The being of God may be the universe ; but more clea?Iy proved, from our own exist- by " his holy and divine word." ence : B. \. ch. \. sec. \. Con. R, D. C. Art.2^ from the existence of all things around us : B. \. ch. 5. sec. 1, and from his impressions on the minds of men. B. 1. ch. 3. 2. God is immutable and without passions. Jnst.B. l.fiassim.^ 3. There is an excellence, a beauty and glory, in God's na- tural as well as moral perfec- tions.. " He hath in all his •works graven certain marks of his glory." There is a fflory of his power and intelligence, displayed in the creation of the heavens, even to those who are ignorant of his holiness. *' Wherefore the author of the epistle to the Hebrews doth ve- ry well call the ages of the world, the spectacle of invisible things Heb. ii. 3. For that the so order- ly framing of the world serveth us for a mirror, wherein we may behold God, who is otherwise invisible. 2. God is immutable, and without passions. Say. Flat, fi, 19. Con. F. C. U.S.fi. 12 and 160. 3. The perfection of God constitutes his excellence ; and his excellence consists in the union of all that consitutes the character of God. Jehovah is the proper object of reverence, obedience and love, because he is " infinite in being and per- fection, a most pure spirit, in- visible, without body,- parts, or passions, immutable, immense^ eternal, incomprehensible, al- mighty, most wise, most holy, most free, most absolute ; work- ing all things according to the counsel of his own immutable and most righteous will, for his own glory ; most loving, gra- cious, merciful, long-suffering. * Calvin treats not somuc'a systematically, as practically of the attributes of the Godhead ; but it may be clearly gathered, tliat his sentiments were perfectly accordant with the Confessions of Faith in the reformed churches. In one place, or other, he speaks of every natural and rnoral attribute ; or of all the perfections which are now enumerated under these two heads . for Calvin appears to have worshipped the undivided character of the Godhead. HOPKINSIANISM, 17 HOPKINS, , AN aad from the existence of such a book as the bible. Syet. Fare. 1. ch. 2. 2. God has no passions like those of men : no affections in- consistent with the eternal and imchanging disapprobation of •sin, and love of holiness.* Syst. Vol. I, /I. 85. 3. « The infinite excellence, beauty and glory of God, con- sist wholly in his moral perfec- tions and character." These are comprehended in holiness ; and " the whole of true holi- ness, or the moral excellence ^nd perfjBction of God, is com- prehended in love ;" or in mo- ral exercises of good will. These exercises have their ob- jecta, and therefore all the mO' ral ficrfectioT} of God consists in the acts of his will, which regard himself and all other beings, according to the nature and fitness of things. Syst. Vol. 1 . /J. 68, 69, and 82. This n OTHERS. amounts to a demonstration, that there loaa some cause of its be- ginning to exist ;" and this cause of the beginning of all created things is God. Mmmons^fi. 16. 2. God is possessed of af- fections, which change as the objects of those affection* change. Emmons^ fi.WS and 118. " It is the design of prayer to move God." JSmmonSffi. 487. 3. " It is well known, that goodness is the sum and comr prehension of all moral excel- lence." Emmons, fi. 2^. "Be- nevolent affections form the moral beauty of the divine cha«- racter. God is love. In this alone consists his moral excel- lence. His independence, air mighty power, and unerring wisdom, are mer« natural per- fections ; but his benevolent feelings are moral beauties. Benevolence appears virtuous and amiable in any moral agent." The passages of scrip- ture which ascribe affections of love, hatred, anger, and de«« * Upon the subject of the narur a/ perfections of the Deity, Dr. H. agrees with Calvin, that God is necessarily existent, infinite in understanding, wisdom and pawer, eternal, immutable, invisible and incomprehensible. In vol. 1. p. 63, he gives such intimations as would lead one to think his notions of the moral attributes peculiar ,- and assures us, that all ^f ho receive his sentiments upon this subject, will assent to his whole system of reli^ous truth, 3 18 CALVINISM. CALVINj AND OTHERS. For which cause the prophet abundant in goodness, and truth, assigneth to the heavenly crea- forgiving iniquity, transgres- tures a language that all nations sion and sin, the revirarder of understand, for that in them them that diligently seek him ; there is an evident testification and withal most just and terrible of the Godhead." in his judgments ; hating all sin, B. 1, ch. 5. sec. 1. and who will by no means clear The Godhead is manifested the guilty." to excite admiration, holy fear, Con. C. Scot. ch. 2. sec. U confidence, hope, love. Be- Con. P. C. U. S. ch. 2. sec. 1. cause he is the fountain of all Say. Plat. ch. 2. sec- 1. good things, we should desire The glory of God's power, to cleave to him. wisdom and goodness was the B. 1. ch. 2. sec. 2. and ch. 3. end of the creation. The glory Goodness moved God to ere- of God's power, wisdom, good- gition. B. l.ch. 5. sec. 5. ness and mercy, is the end of God's will, and not the na- the works of Providence. The ture of things, is the law of di- glory of God's grace, was the vine action. " It is great wick- end of election ; and the glory edness to inquire of the causes of his justice, the end of repro- of the will of God ; since it is bation. To glorify himself is the cause of all things that ex- the end of all his works ; and to ist, and worthily so ought to be. glorify God is the chief end, For if it hav« any cause, then and happiness of man.* somewhat must go before it, ^li the Confessions, ■whereto it must be as it were connected ; which it is unlaw- ful once to imagine." Inst. B. 3. ch. 23. sec. 2. * The Confessions say nothing of disinterested love in the Godhead. The CalvinistB, liowever, supjwse, that disinterested must mean, that the person who loves lias either some interest or no interest ; for, in every moral action, the agent must be either interested or j/n-interested. God they cannot suppose to have been wn-intercsted, or, not interested, m his works. Interest, in man, may be according to moral law, or contrary to it: and that interest, of a personal nature, which the law allows, is self-love i^ jmd is a duty : while a regard to personal intprest, contrary to lav is stlj- i^hneas / and is sin. HOPKINSIANISM. 19 HOPKINS, A holiness, or love of God is Uni- versal, infinite, dhintereated* benevolence, which necessariijr includes the love of compla- cence in all goodness, a regaid to being in general, opposition to all which is opposite to itself, even to all self-love, or selfish- ness ; wisdom to design and promote the greatest good, jus- tice to punish self-love, truth, mercy, grace, compassion, pa- tience, forbearance, wrath ; and absolute, uncontrolable sove- reignty. St/8t./rom 68 to 89 /i. of Vol. 1. ND OTHERS. light to God, are not figurative, but ought to be taken in a liter* al sense. Eminons., fi. 114, 115; " Since all the affections of the Deity are only different modifi- cations of pure, disinterested benevolence, they admit of a constant and perfect gratifica- tion ; and since he is able with infinite ease to attain every de- sirable object, his affections are always gratified, and always af- ford him a source of complete and permanent felicity." Em- mons., fi. 116. " God loves and hates with all his heai't, with all his mind, and with all his strength. In the view of this subject, we may discover what it was, which moved God to the work of creation." Emmons^ it. 120. WilliamH^ Ser.fi. 142. • This vjord forms no inconsiderable part of tlie Hopkinsian system. It IS repeatedly applied to God as well as men. Disinterested love, the defenders of the word say, is directly opposed to self-love Do they intend that a due regard to self is sin ? By no means. Again, they say that diiin- terested love consists in tlie preference of a greater public, to a less private good. The Calvinists ask, " How canyon apply this term to God ? Does he act from any otlicr motive than a love of himself !" The Hopkinsians answer, " God is himself the greatest good ; and tliercfore he loves him. self, not for his oiun sake, but because he is Uie greatest g^od ; and this is not self-love, but both of Christ the Saviour, and of those to be saved by him. For even H0PKIN9IANISM. 27 HOPKINS, AND OTHERS. number of men and angels to character they shall possess to everlasting happiness ; and, 4. answer this end, and that he The refirobation ot a definite will then treat them according number of men and devils.* to their moral character. Syat. Part. I.cA. 4. Emmons^ p. 391, et passim. 4. In the decree of election, a 4. The decree of election definite number of persons, consists in God's determining were predestinated to the pos- who shall repent, believe, come session of such a moral charac- to Christ and be saved, ter as would display divine mcr- Williafns' 5tU Sermon, cy in their pardon through the atonement made to the law ; and by regeneration to the pos- session of such holiness as shall unite them to Christ, and ren- der them the proper objects of everlasting love. Compare Syst. Part 1. ch. 4. ivith Part 2. cA. 4. p. 174 and 175. Christ was chosen of God, and by an eternal and immutable decree, g^iven to be our Saviour ; and therefore is said to be " fore-ordained before the foundation of the world." 1 Pet. i. 20. And they whom Christ was to save were given to him by the same decree. John xvii. 6. They are said to be "chosen in Christ." Eph. i. 4. That is, not only by Christ as God, and consequently the elector of them ; but also in Christ as Mediator, and on that account, the elected, who by one and the same act, was given to them to be their head and lord, and attlie same time they were given to him to be his members and property, to be saved by his merit and power, and to enjoy communion with liim." IFitsius* Economy, B. 3. cA.4. sec. 2. The decree of election, therefore, is the foundation of the atonement, justification, effectual calUng through faitli to spiritual life, sanctification, preservation, and the end of all, the glorification of God by the glorifica- tion of ransomed rebels. * "In forming characters, God exercises neither justice nor injustice In the creation of moral agents and in the formation of their characters, God exercises his sovereignty. He has a right to create as many rational beings, and to give to every one such natural faculties, and such a moral character as he pleases." He forms the unholy character, that he may danm tlie person who possesses it, for the promotion of the greatest good. Williamz,p, 192, 193. Where now is the regard to the/A»' NOTE B. OF STATURAL A.VT) MORAL ABILITY. This same writer says,//. 183, that " as there is a wide differ- ence between natural good and moral good, and between natural evil and moral ; so there is a wide difference between natural ability and moral ability. And if we do not carefully mark the dibtintdou between them, wc shall blend and confound things which differ, and grope in the dark, instead of communicating light. Then ; what is natural ability ? A'atural ability is the in- tellectual, and bodily strength of man to Jierform every action ivhich God requires of him. Ability relates to action : and all men according to this acceptation of the word, are able to perform what God requires. For, God is infinitely reasonable in his re- quirements. It is as much impossible for God to require more of us than we have intellectual andcorporeal strength to perform, as it is for him to be unjust. There is a perfect correspondence between the commands of God, and the natural ability of the sub- jects of his command." On fiage 9, he says " though the heart of man be wholly depraved, it does not follow that his intellectual and animal exercises are depraved any more than his fingernails: for they are not of a moral kind." And hence he infers, that neither bodily action, nor the exercises of reason, judgment and conscience are holy or sinful. His whole controversy with Dr. Tappan is designed to show, that God requires nothing but holy moral action, and in no case demands, without this, intellectual &r bodily exercise. Yet it is intellectual and bodily strength 54^ OF NATURAL AND MORAL ABILITY. which affords man such natural ability as renders him a moral ag'enly and binds him to obedience by moral obligation. To such reasoning, the Calvinists reply ; what have intellec- tual and bodily sttength to do with moral action ? There is some- thing illogical in your sweeping the cords, back and forth, from natural ability to moral action, and from moral ability to natural action. You may thus charm, with the music of words, but will not convince the man of sound mind. We agree with you, that " ability relates to action ;" and that there must be a corresfioridence between the commands of God and man's ability j and also, between the nature of the ability and the nature of the action ; to render the sinner, according to your system, a subject of moral government. The ability must not only relate to the action, but be adapted to it : for the trunk of a tree, its bark and buds, may have some relation to pears, but no one would say that the trunk, bark and buds of the oak, constitu- ted a capacity for bearing either pears or peaches. Moral fruits as well as natural require an afxfirofiriate capacity. Intellectual action requires intellectual ability : mechanical action, mechanical ability: muscular action, muscular ability ; and moral action, MORAL ABILITY. You would Call the man an idiot, who should talk of his intellectual ability of mechanically keeping time ; or who should say, that he had the corporal ability of thought, with- out the intervention oi mental power. What then shall we call those persons, who tell us, " sinners have a natural ability, or intellectual and bodily strength, for 7noral action" while they with the same breath tell us, that there is nothing moraliu bodily action or capacity ; nothing 7noral in intellectual exercise ? To love God, you say is a moral action, and men are bound to love God, because they have ability to think and to walk, while they have not ability to love. Is this logic ? Is this the way to silence cavillers, and justify the impeached rectitude of Jehovah, in re- quiring fallen man to be holy ? " What is moral ability ? As moral ability belongs to the heart of man only, and not to his natural faculties; it is obvious, that moral ability to obey God consists, in a man^s loving his command- ments. Accordingly, when we say that a good man is the sub- ject of moral ability to love God, the import is this, tliat he actur OP NATURAli AND MORAL ABILITY. 55 ally loves him." fi. 184 and 185. It seems then, that moral ability is not the power of loving^ but the act of loving* Man therefore, never has any p.oxoer to love God., except the power of thinking and of muscular motion, until he loves God ; and this intellectual and bodily ability is nothing which appertains to moral ability, or action ! Logic upon logic ! Again it is said, page 54, that " the heart of man is the only source of moral exercise ;" and again, fi. 42. " the heart ofman^ which is the sum or aggregate of his moral exercises^ is totally evil." Where there has been but one holy exercise, that is a man's good heart. This is \\\s first exercise : but the heart is a source of moral exercise, and this heart being an exercise, it follows, that one exercise is the source of another exercise ; and therefore there must have been one holy exercise before the first holy exercise. This is the logic of that pre-eminently ra- tional system, called, in distinction from those who maintain the doctrine of the communication of a holy tastey biait, or JirincifilCf « THE EXERCISE SChcmC." • " A principle or pover of action in distinction from action, lies quite beyond the reach of description or conception." Spring' t Diiquisitiont, p. 205. " What is the description of that ability which neither consists in bodily and intellectual strength, nor in voluntary exercise f* Ibid. p. 185. £6 CALvWflsM. CHAPTER VII. OF BIVIjYE PROVIDEJVCE, IjX RELATIOK to Tim ORWU^ OF EVIL, AA''D REPROBATIOJ