hi,\ ZURICH LETTERS. JFov tfje i3«Wication of tfie 212aorfe0 of t1)e JFaif^tVfi antt ©arlp mtvittx^ of t^e BcfonnrH OR THE CORRESPONDENCE OF SEVERAL ENGLISH BISHOPS AND OTHERS, WITH SOME OF THE HELVETIAN EEFORMERS, DUEING THE REIGN OF QUEEN ELIZABETH. CHIEFLY FROM THE ARCHIVES OF ZURICH. XRANbLn-TED FR0.4 AUTHENTICAl'ED COPiEE 0> THE 'AUT95RArHS, AND EDITED FOR BY THE REV. HASTINGS ROBINSON, D.D. F.A.S. RECTOR OF GREAT WAIU.EV ESSEX; AND FORMERLY FELLOW OF ST JOHN'S COLLEGE CAMBRIDGE. SECOND EDITION, CHRONOLOGICALLY ARRANGED IN ONE SERIES. CAMBRIDGE: PRINTED AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS. M.DCCC.XLVI. S02>S INTRODUCTION On the accession of queen Mary to the throne of England,"" A.D. 1553, she proceeded with much severity against the favourers of the Reformation ; of whom upwards of a thousand persons, according to bishop Burnet ^ sought refuge among the protestant churches on the continent. Many of them settled at Zurich, where " they were entertained both by the magistrates ^ and the ministers, Bullinger, Gualter, Weidner, Simler, Lavater, Gesner, and all the rest of that body, with a tenderness and affection that engaged them to the end of their lives to make the greatest acknowledg- ments possible for it." After their return home, upon queen Elizabeth's coming to the crown, a.d. 1558, they maintained a close correspondence with their late hosts ; and their letters, toge- ther with those of Bullinger, have long been regarded among the principal objects of interest in the Zurich archives. Copies of these letters, or at least of a portion of them, were obtained by bishop Burnet and Strype ; both of whom have made frequent reference to them in their respective works. A few of the letters, chiefly those of Jewel, are printed, though very inaccurately, in the Historical Records appended to Burnet, who has also in- troduced occasional abstracts into the body of his history. The like may be said of Strype, though to a far less extent : so that the collection, as a whole, may be considered as having been for the first time presented to the public, in the two volumes edited for the Parker Society in 1842 and 1845. 1 Hist, of Reformation, Vol. ii. p. 388. The names of five bishops, five deans, four archdeacons, and fifty-seven doctors in divinity and preachers, are given by Strype, Life of Cranmer, i. 440. 2 Burnet, as above, in. 408. Strype adds, that the magistrates offered, by Bullinger, to supply the exiles with such a quantity of bread-corn and wine, as should serve to sustain thirteen or fourteen peo[)le ; but they with thanks refused it. Cranmer, i. 509. ■ Iv' '-11 VI INTRODUCTION. The copies from which the first of those volumes was printed and the translation made, were procured from Zurich, for his own use, by the late Rev. John Hunter, of Bath ; who, on hearing of the formation of the Parker Society, with unsolicited kindness and liberality immediately placed them at its disposal. But as he found reason for believing, upon a subsequent journey thither in 1842, that the contents of the library and archives of that city had not been fully explored by him on his former visit, he directed the attention of the council of the Society to the expediency of instituting a more extended examination. And as several com- munications had been received, indicating that there were other depositories in Switzerland which would repay examination, it was resolved that a complete investigation should be made, in the hope of procuring some additional documents connected with the history of the English Reformation. For accomplishing this object, the Council availed themselves of the assistance of the Rev. Steuart A. Pears, Fellow of Corpus Christi College, Oxford, who proceeded to Zurich in the summer of 1843, where he was occupied for a considerable time in a full investigation of the contents of the public hbrary and archives. The first object of attention in the town library of Zurich is the Simler collection of the correspondence of the Swiss Reformers. This was made by the late John Jacob Simler, (a descendant of the Josiah Simler so frequently mentioned in the Zurich Letters,) superintendent of schools in the Canton of Zurich, who died August the 5th, 1788. He appears to have examined with great accuracy all the collections of letters, manuscript and printed, public and private, within his reach. He copied fully 18,000 letters with his own hand, arranged them all chronologically, and at the head of each noted the collection, volume, and page in which the original is to be found. The whole work extends to nearly 200 folio volumes, of which 140 are occupied by the period a.d. 1530 — 1600. This collection, therefore, formed a most accurate guide to the collections of originals in the archives and library at Zurich, Strasburgh, and Berne, and the libraries at Basle, Zofingen, Geneva, St Gall, and Schaifhausen, whence also Mr Pears procured those other letters INTKODUCTION. relative to the English Reformation, which are included in the present collection, the places from whence they were obtained being marked in the table of contents. From the additional letters obtained by Mr Pears, a second series or volume was pubUshed, completing the correspondence of the Enghsh Reformers and others during the reign of Elizabeth, from the sources above mentioned ; thereby supplying many of the chasms in the chronological arrangement of the preceding volume. And as it appeared desirable to afford facilities for a consecutive perusal of the entire series, the Council of the Parker Society, in compliance with a wish expressed by many of its members, have reprinted, in the present volume, the English translation of the original letters, with the exception of a few which bear no refer- ence to the English Reformation. The whole collection is now presented in proper chronological order ; and a reference is given, at the heading of each, to its position in the previous volumes, A. signifying the first series, B. the second. The accuracy of the collation of the letters procured from Zurich, with the original autographs there deposited, is attested by M. de Meyer von Knonau, the keeper of the archives, to whose courtesy the Parker Society is considerably indebted for much valuable attention, and information respecting them. In a letter, written Nov. 28, 1841, he thus describes the present condition of those which are originals : " You have expressed a desire to know in what volumes the letters of your countrymen are to be found. The greater portion of them is in the archives of the State of Zurich, and the remainder in the library of that city. The volumes in the archives which contain these letters are all bound in parchment, the margin not at all cut off, the leaves being tilled throughout. On this account it is necessary to handle them with the greatest delicacy. They are numbered as follows. Class V. i. Nos. 108, 109, 113, 114, 164. The last number has for its title, ' English Letters from the Reformation to the 17th century.' The letters in the city library are dispersed through nine volumes, numbered, 38, 39, 42, 46, 56, 57, 60, 61, 62, and are in the manu- script class F. They are also bound in parchment, as the volumes Vlll INTRODUCTION, in the archives, to which they bear a great resemblance. Almost all these letters are original, and, with the exception of those of Kichard Cox, F. Bedford, and the duke of Suffolk, who have only added their signatures, are in the handwriting of their respective authors. That of queen Ehzabeth is only a copy." In addition to the letters already published, and which com- prise the correspondence of the English Reformers during the reign of Ehzabeth, preserved in the collections above mentioned, there have been obtained upwards of three hundred others, written during the reigns of Henry VIII., Edward VI., and queen Mary, which are arranged so as to form another volume of the publications of the Parker Society. The editor refrains from any remarks upon the various topics treated in these letters ; it being his desire, and the object of the Society, that the respective writers should speak for themselves. The notes therefore are only added for the purpose of throwing additional light upon the facts and circumstances recorded in the correspondence. To have aimed at less than this would have left the book uninteUigible to a large portion of its readers ; and to have endeavoured more, would have been inconsistent with the objects of the Society under whose auspices it is pubhshed. The edition of Strype, referred to in the notes, is that of Oxford, 1822, &c. That of Burnet is the edition of Dr Nares, Loudon, 1839. H. R. Great AVarley, April 18, 184G. CONTENTS. The capitals affixed to the titles in the following list indicate the sources from which the transcripts of the original documents were procured : A denoting the Archives at Zurich. L the City Library at ditto. S.C the Simler Collection. Str the Library at Strasburgh. SchafF. the Library at Schaffhausen. Berne 1 Geneva ...f the respective libraries in those places. Zofingen ... J Op the published works of the writers, most of them being also in the Simler Collection. LET. I. Sir A. Cook to Henry BuUinger Strasburgh, Dec. 8, 1558. IL Thomas Sampson to Peter Martyr Strasburgh, Dec. 17, 1558. IIL Edwin Sandys to H. Bullinger Strasburgh, Dec. 20, 1558. IV. John HaUer to H. Bullinger Berne, Jan. 11, 1559. V. Rodolph Gualter to Queen Elizabeth ...Zurich, Jan. 10, 1559. VI. Rod. Gualter to Lord Francis Russel ...Zurich, Jan. 16, 1559. VII. Rod, Gualter to Richard Masters Zurich, Jan. 16, 1559. VIII. John Jewel to Peter Martyr Strasburgh, Jan. 26, 1559. L IX. Sir A. Cook to Peter Martyr London, Feb. 12, 1559. X. Richard Hilles to H. Bullinger London, Feb. 28, 1559. XL John Jewel to Peter Martyr London, March 20, 1559 XII. The same to the same London, Apr. 6, 1559. XIII. The same to the same London, Apr. 14, 1559. XIV. The same to the same London, Apr. 28, 1559. XV. The same to the same London, no date. XVI. John Foxe to Henry Bullinger Basle, May 13, 1559. XVII. Richard Cox to Wolfgang Weidner London, May 20, 1559. XVIII. John Parkhurst to H. Bullinger London, May 21, 1559. XIX. John Parkhurst to Conrad Gesner London, May 21, 1559. XX. John Jewel to H. Bullinger London, May 22, 1559. XXI. Edmund Grindal to Conrad Hubert London, May 23, 1559. XXII. John Foxe to Henry Bullinger Basle, June 17, 1559. XXIII. John Foxe to Henry Frcnsham Basle, June 17, 1559. XXU'. Laurence Humphrey to H. Bullinger ...Basic, June 23, 1559. XXV. Edmund Grindal to Conrad Hubert ...London, July 14, 1550. PA (IK A I L 2 A 3 A C A 7 A 11 A 13 . L 15 A 1« A 19 L 21 L 25 L 28 L 30 L 3 A 35 A 36 A 38 A 40 A 41 Str. 43 A 45 A 47 L 48 Str. 49 LET. XXVI. XXVII. XXVIII. XXIX. XXX. XXXI. XXXII. XXXIII. XXXIV. XXXV. XXXVI. XXXVII. XXXVIII. XXXIX. XL. XLI. XLII. XLIII. XLIV. XLV. XLVI. XLVII. XLVIII. XLIX. L. LI. LIL LIIL LIV. LV. LVI. LVIL LVIII. LIX. LX. LXL LXII. LXIII. LXIV. LXV. LXVI. CONTKNTS. I'AGE Peter Martyr to Thomas Sampson ...Zurich, July 15, 1559. Op. 52 John Jewel to Peter Martyr liondon, Aug. 1, 1559. L 54 John Foxe to H. BuUinger Basle, Aug. 2, 1559. A 56 Thomas Lever to H. Bullinger London, Aug. 8, 1559. L 57 John Jewel to Peter Martyr London, Nov. 2, 1559. L 60 John Jewel to Rod. Gualter London, Nov. 2, 1559. L 63 John Jewel to Josiah Simler London, Nov. 2, 1559. L 64 Peter Martyr to Thomas Sampson Zurich, Nov. 4, 1559. Op. 65 John Jewel to Peter Martyr London, Nov. 5, 1559. L 67 The same to the same London, Nov. 16, 1559. L 69 The same to the same London, Dec. 1, 1559. L 73 John Parkhurst to Josiah Simler ...Bishop's Cleeve, Dec. 20, 1559. L 74 John Calvin to Sir W. Cecil Geneva, after Jan. 29, 1559. Berne. 76 Thomas Sampson to Pet. Martyr Jan. 6, 1560. L 78 Bp Cox to Peter Martyr London, no date L 81 Earl of Bedford to Rod. Gualter I;ondon, Jan. 21, 1560. L 82 Peter Martyr to Thomas Sampson Zurich, Feb. 1, 1560. Op. 84 Bp Jewel to Peter Martyr London, Feb. 4, 1560. L 86 Bp Cox to George Cassander London, March 4, 1560. S.C. 88 Bp Jewel to Peter Martyr London, IMarch 5, 1560. L 89 George Cassander to Bp Cox Worms, 1560. S.C. 91 Peter Martyr to Thomas Sampson ...Zurich, March 20, 1560. A 95 Bp Sandys to Peter Martyr London, April 1, 1560. L 97 Thomas Sampson to Peter MartjT: ...London, fllay 13, 1560. L 99 Bp Jewel to Peter Martyr London, May 22, 1560. L 101 The same to the same Salisbury, June 1, 1560. L 104 Nicolas Gallasius to John Calvin London, June 30, 1560. Geneva 106 Thomas Lever to H. Bullinger Coventry, July 10, 1560. A 108 Bp Jewel to Peter Martyr Salisbury, July 17, 1560. L 112 Bp Grindal to Conrad Hubert London, Oct. 5, 1560. Str. 114 Bp Jewel to Peter Martyr Salisbury, Nov. 6, 1560. L 115 Rod. Gualter to Lord F. Russel Zurich, IMarch 16, 1561. A 117 Richard Masters to Rod. Gualter Greenwich, June 16, 1561. L 119 Pet. Martyr to a nobleman in England.Zurich, July 22, 1561. Op. 120 Bp Jewel to Peter Martyr Salisbury, Feb. 7, 1562. L 123 Bp Jewel to H. Bullinger Salisbury, Feb. 9, 1562. A 127 Bp Jewel to Josiah Simler Salisbury, Feb. 10, 1562. L 129 Richard Masters to Rod. Gualter London, Feb. 22, 1562. L 129 Roger Ascham to John Sturniius London, Apr. 11, 1562. Str. 131 Bp Parkhurst to Henry Bullinger Ludham, April 28, 1562. L 138 The same to the same Ludham, fliay 31, 1562. A 140 CONTENTS. LET. LXVII. Bp Grindal to Conrad Hubert London, June 6, 1562. LXVIII. Archbp Parker to Matt. Flacius, &c. Croydon, July 18, s. a. LXIX. Richard Hilles to Henry Bullinger London, July 31, 15(12. LXX. Bp Cox to Peter Martyr London, Aug. 5, 1562. LXXL Herman Folkerzheimer to J. Simler ...Salisbury, Aug. 13, 1562. LXXII. Bp Jewel to Henry Bullinger Salisbury, Aug. 14, 1562. LXXIIL Bp Jewel to Peter Martyr Salisbury, Aug. 14, 1562. LXXIV. Bp Jewel to Josiah Simler Salisbury, Aug. 18, 1562. LXXV. Bp Parkhurst to Henry Bullinger Ludham, Aug. 20, 1562. LXXVL Peter Martyr to Bishop Jewel Zurich, Aug. 24, 1562. LXXVIL Roger Ascham to John Sturmius London, Oct. 21, 1562. LXXVIII. Bp Jewel to Henry Bullinger London, March 5, 1563. LXXIX. Her. Folkerzheimer to Jos. Simler London, March 15, 1563. LXXX. Bp Jewel to Josiah Simler London, March 23, 1563. LXXXI. Bp Parkhurst to Henry Bullinger liudham, April 26, 1563. LXXXIL Bp Grindal to John Calvin.. London, June 19, 1563. LXXXIII. Thomas Sampson to Henry Bullinger, Oxford, July 26, 1563. LXXXIV. Bp Parkhurst to Henry Bullinger Ludham, Aug. 13, 1563. LXXXV. Laur. Humphrey to Hen. Bullinger ...Oxford, Aug. 16, 1563. LXXX VI. H. Zanchius to Bishop Grindal, Strasburgh, before Aug. 23, 1563. LXXXVII. H. Folkerzheimer to Josiah Simler ...Embden, Aug. 21, 1563. LXXXVIII. Bp Grindal to Conrad Hubert Fulham, Aug. 23, 1563. LXXXIX. John Abel to Henry Bullinger London, Aug. 24, 1563. XC. Bp Horn to Henry Bullinger Winchester, Dec. 13, 1563. XCI. Bp Parkhurst to Josiah Simler Ludham, Feb. 17, 1564. XCII. Hierome Zanchius to Bishop Grindal, near Chiavenna, Aug. 1564. XCIII. Hierome Zanchius to Henry KnoUes, near Chiavenna, Aug. 1564. XCIV. Bp Jewel to Henry Bullinger Salisbury, March 1, 1565. XCV. Richard Masters to Rodolph Gualter... London, March 4, 1565. XCVI. Bp Horn to Rodolph Gualter Farnham Castle, July 17, 1565. XCVII. Bp Parkhurst to Henry Bullinger Ludham, Aug. 18, 1565. XCVIIL Henry Bullinger to Bishop Horn Zurich, Nov. 3, 1565. XCIX. Bp Sandys to Henry Bullinger Worcester, Jan. 3, 1566. C. Bp Jewel to Henry Bullinger, &c Salisbury, Feb. 8, 1566. CI. Laurence Humphrey to H. Bullinger, Oxford, Feb. 9, 1566. CII. Thomas Sampson to Henry Bullinger, London, Feb. 16, 1566. cm. Bp Jewel to Henry Bullinger Salisbury, March 10, 1566. CIV. H. Bullinger to Laur. Humphrey, &c. Zurich, May 1, 1566. CV. Henry Bullinger to Bishop Horn, &c. Zurich, May 3, 1566. CVI. John Abel to Henry Bullinger London, June 6, 1566, CVII. IMiles Coverdale, &c. to W. Farell, &c., London, July, 1566. PAGE Str. 141 S.C. 143 A 146 L 147 L 149 L 154 L 157 L 159 A 160 Op. 161 Str. 163 L 166 L 168 S.C. 170 A 172 Geneva 173 A 174 A 175 A 177 Op. 178 L 184 Str. 186 A 187 A 188 L 190 Op. 191 Op. 192 A 194 L 197 A 199 A 201 A 202 A 205 A 206 A 210 A 211 A 213 A 214 S.C. 224 A 225 S.C. 228 Xll CONTENTS. LET. CVIII. William Turner to Henry Bullinger ...July 23, ISOC. CIX. L. Humphrey to Henry Bullinger July, 1566. ex. Bp Parkhurst to Henry Bullinger Ludham, Aug. 21, 1566. CXI. Bp Grindal to Henry Bullinger London, Aug. 27, 1566. CXII. Theodore Beza to Henry Bullinger Geneva, Sept. 3, 1566. CXIII. H. Bullinger, &c. to Bp Grindal, &c., Zurich, Sept. 6, 1566. CXIV. Henry Bullinger to Miles Coverdale ...Zurich, Sept. 10, 1566. CXV. H. Bullinger, «&c. to L. Humphrey, &c.Zurich, Sept. 10, 1566. CXVI. H. Bullinger, &c. to the Earl of Bedford, Zurich, Sept. 11, 1566. CXVII. Rodolph Gualter to Bp Parkhurst Zurich, Sept. 11, 1566. CXVIII. Rodolph Gualter to Theodore Beza ....Zurich, Sept. 11, 1566. CXIX. Richard Hilles to Henry Bullinger Antwerp, Dec. 20, 1566. CXX. Perceval Wiburn's account of the Church of England, s. a. CXXI. Bp Grindal, &c. to H. Bullinger, &c... London, Feb. 6, 156?. CXXIL G. Withers, &c. to H. Bullinger, &c. 1567. CXXIII. Bp Grindal to Henry Bullinger London, Feb. 8, 1567. CXXIV. Bp Jewel to Henry Bullinger Salisbury, Feb. 24, 1567- CXXV. Perceval Wiburn to Henry Bullinger ..London, Feb. 25, 1567- CXXVI. Bp Grindal to Henry Bullinger London, June 21, 1567. CXXVII. Theodore Beza to Henry Bullinger Geneva, July 29, 1567- CXXVIII. Bp Parkhurst to Henry BuUmger Ludham, July 31, 1567- CXXIX. H. Bullinger, &c. to Theodore Beza.. .Zurich, Aug. 3, 1567. CXXX. George Withers to the elector Palatine, Without place or date. CXXXI. Richard Hilles to Henry Bullinger London, Aug. 23, 1567. CXXXIl. H. Bullinger, &c. to Bp Grindal, &c..Zurich, Aug. 26, 1567. CXXXIII. Bp Grindal to Henry Bullinger London, Aug. 29, 1567- CXXXIV. Bp Grindal to Theodore Beza, &c London, April 17, 1568. CXXXV. Bp Grindal to Henry Bullinger London, June 11, 1568. CXXXVI. Bp Parkhurst to Rod. Gualter, &c Ludham, Aug. 4, 1568. CXXXVII. Bp Cox to Henry Bullinger 1568. CXXXVIII. Christopher Mont to Henry Bullinger, Strasburgh, Dec. 27, 1568. CXXXIX. Queen Elizabeth to John Sturmius ....Westminster, May 1, 1569. CXL. Bp Grindal to Henry Bullinger Fulham, Aug. 13, 1569. CXLI. John Sturmius to Queen Elizabeth Strasburgh, Sept. 6, 1569. CXLII. John Sturmius to Sir William Cecil... Strasburgh, Sept. 8, 1569. CXLIII. Richard Hilles to Henry Bullinger ....London, Feb. 6, 1570. CXLIV. Bp Grindal to Henry Bullinger London, P'eb. 18, 1570. CXLV. Bp Cox to Henry Bullinger Ely, July 10, 1570. CXLVI. Bp Pilkington to Henry Bullinger July 17, 1570. CXLVII. Archbp Grindal to Henry Bullinger ...London, July 31, 1570. CXLVIII. Bp Jewel to H. Bullinger Aug. 7, 1570. PAGE L 230 A 233 A 240 A 242 A 245 A 253 A 255 A 256 A 258 A 260 A 262 A 266 A 269 A 273 A 279 A 283 A 285 A 288 A 291 A 293 A 294 A 296 A 298 A 305 A 307 A 30« S.C. 313 A 313 A 317 A 318 A 319 Str. 322 A 323 Str. 325 Str. 326 A 327 A 331 A 334 A 336 A 337 A 339 CONTENTS. XIU LET. PAGE CXLIX. Bp Parkhurst to H. Bullinger Norwich, Jan. IG, 1571. A 342 CL. Bp Jewel to H. Bullinger Salisbury, March 2, 1571. A 343 CLI. R. Hilles to H. Bullinger London, March 8, 1571. A 345 CLII. The same to the same London, July 27, 1571. A 348 CLIIL Bp Cox to H. Bullinger after July 27, 1571. A 350 CLIV. John Day to H. Bullinger London, Aug. 8, 1571. A 352 CLV. Bp Horn to H. Bullinger London, Aug. 8, 1571. A 353 CLVL Bp Parkhurst to H. Bullinger Ludham, Aug. 10, 1571. A 361 CLVII. Hierome Zanchius to bishop Jewel ...Heidelberg, Sept. 2, 1571. Op. 304 CLVIII. Hierome Zanchius to Queen Elizabeth, Heidelberg, Sept. 10, 1571. Op. 307 CLIX. Archbp Grindal to H. Bullinger Bishopsthorpe, Jan. 25, 1572. A 381 CLX. Rodolph Zuinglius to Bp Sandys Cambridge, Jan. 26, 1572. A 385 CLXL Bp Cox to Rodolph Gualter Ely, Feb. 12, 1572. A 387 CLXII. Bp Cox to Henry Bullinger Ely, Feb. 12, 1572. L 31*1 CLXIII. Bp Sandys to Henry Bullinger London, Feb. 17, 1572. A 393 CLXIV. Richard Hilles to Henry Bullinger... London, Feb. 18, 1572. A 395 CLXV. Bp Parkhurst to Henry Bullinger Ludham, 3Iarch 10, 1572. A 398 CLXVI. R. Gualter the younger to R. Gualter, London, June 5, 1572. A 399 CLXVII. Bp Cox to Henry Bullinger.. .London, Ely House, June 6, 1572. L 403 CLXVIIL Rod. Gualter to Bishop Cox Zurich, June 9, 1572. A 404 CLXIX. Richard Hilles to Henry Bullinger London, July 10, 1572. A 407 CLXX. Lord Burghley to John Sturmius Woodstock, Sept. 15, 1572. Str. 412 CLXXI. Bp Horn to Henry Bullinger Farnham Castle, Jan. 10, 1573. A 413 CLXXII. Bp Parkhurst to Henry Bullinger Ludham, Jan. 20, 1573. A 415 CLXXin. Bp Cox to Rodolph Gualter Ely, Feb. 4, 1573. A 410 CLXXIV. Bp Cox to Henry Bullinger Without place or date. A 419 CLXXV. Bp Cox to Rodolph Gualter Ely, June 12, 1573. A 420 CLXXVI. Rod. Gualter to the Earl of Bedford... Zurich, July 17, 1573. A 422 CLXXVIl. Bp Pilkington to Rodolph Gualter ...July 20, 1573. L 424 CLXXVIII. Rod. Gualter the younger to Josiah Simler, Oxford, July 20, 1573. L 420 CLXXIX. Sir John Wolley to John Sturmius ...Orpington, July 24, 1573. Str. 42!» CLXXX. William Cole to Rodolph Gualter Oxford, July 26, 1573. 1/ 430 CLXXXI. Laurence Humphrey to Rod. Gualter. Oxford, July 28, 1573. L 432 CLXXXII. Archbp Grindal to Henry Bullinger... York, July 31, 1573. A 434 CLXXXIII. Archbp Grindal to Rodolph Gualter... York, July 31, 1573. L 43(; CLXXXIV. Robert Cooch to Rodolph Gualter, Queen's Palace, Aug. 13, 1573. A 437 CLXXX V. Bp Sandys to Henry Bullinger London, Aug. 15, 1573. A 438 CLXXXVL Rodolph Gualter to Bishop Cox Zurich, Aug. 26, 1573. A 440 CLXXXVII. Rodolph Gualter to Bishop Sandys ...Zurich, Oct. 8, 1573. A 450 CLXXXVIIl. John Sturmius to Queen Elizabeth ...Strasburgh, Nov. 10, 1573. Str. 451 CLXXXIX. Bp t;ox to Uodolpl! Gualter Ely, Feb. 3, 1574. A 45-' XIV CONTENTS. CXC. Bp Parkhurst to Henry BiiUinger Ludham, Feb. 6, 1574. CXCI. Bp Parkhurst to Josiah Simler Ludham, Feb. 7, 1574. CXCII. Henry BuUinger to Bishop Sandys ...Zurich, 3Iarch 10, 1574. CXCIII. Henry Bullinger to Archbp Grindal... Zurich, March 10, 1574. CXCIV. Rodolph Gualter to Bishop Cox Zurich, March 16, 1574. CXCV. Bp Parkhurst to Henry Bullinger Ludham, June 29, 1574. CXCVI. Bp Parkhurst to Josiah Simler Ludham, June 30, 1574. CXCVII. Antony Corranus to Henry Bullinger, London, July 7, 1574. CXCVIII. Bp Cox to Rodolph Gualter Ely, July 12, 1574. CXCIX. Bp Cox to Henry Bullinger Ely, July 20, 1574. CC. WUliam Cole to Rodolph Gualter Oxford, July 31, 1574. CCL Laurence Humphrey to Rod. Gualter, Oxford, Aug. 2, 1574. CCIL Bp Sandys to Henry Bullinger Fulham, Aug. 9, 1574. CCIII. Bp Sandys to Rodolph Gualter Fulham, Aug. 9, 1574. CCIV. Queen Elizabeth to John Sturmius ...Bath, Aug. 23, 1574. CCV. Rodolph Gualter to Bishop Cox Zurich, Aug. 26, 1574. CCVl. Bp Cox to Henry BulHnger Ely, Jan. 25, 1575. CCVIl. William Barlow to Josiah Simler Eton, Jan. 25, 1575. CCVIIL Bp Cox to Rodolph Gualter Ely, 1575. CCIX. The same to the same Ely, July 31, 1575. CCX. Nicolas Bernius to Bishop Horn Guernsey, Dec. 13, 1575. CCXI. Bp Horn to Bernius, &c Waltham, Jan 15, 1576. CCXII. William Barlow to Josiah Simler Eton, March 13, 1576. CCXIIL Bp Cox to Rodolph Gualter Ely, 1576. CCXIV. Hierome Zanchius to Archbp Grindal, Heidelberg, July 22, 1576. CCXV. Bp Horn to Rodolph Gualter Waltham, Aug. 10, 1576. CCXVl. J. Rainolds to R. Gualter the younger, Oxford, Aug. 13, 1576. CCXVII. Rodolph Gualter to Archbp Grindal... Zurich, Aug. 24, 1576. CCXVIII. Lewin to John Sturmius London, Aug. 25, 1576. CCXIX. The same to the same London, Sept. 8, 1576. CCXX. Sir F. Walsingham to J. Sturmius, ...London, April 23, 1577- CCXXI. Sir Philip Sidney to Hubert Languet, At Court, Oct. 1, 1577. CCXXII. Rod. Gualter to George Buchanan Zurich, Dec. 22, 1 577- CCXXIII. Sir Philip Sidney to Hubert Languet, At Court, March 1, 1578. CCXXI V. L. Humphrey to Rodolph Gualter Oxford, Aug. 11, 1578. CCXXV. The same to the same Oxford, Dec. 17, 1578. CCXXVI. Richard Hilles to Rodolph Gualter ...London, Jan. 10, 1579. CCXXVII. Bp Cox to Rodolph Gualter Feb. 28, 1579. CCXXVIII. Earl of Bedford to Rodolph Gualter ...Exeter, Feb. 28, 1579. CCXXIX. William Cole to Rodolph Gualter Oxford, Feb. 28, 1579. CCXXX. Hubert Languet to Peter Hubner Baden, June 4, 1579. PAGE A 455 L 456 A 457 A 460 A 464 A 468 L 470 A 471 L 472 A 474 L 475 L 476 A 478 L 478 Zofing. , 480 A 480 A 481 L 482 A 486 A 487 L 488 L 492 L 494 L 496 , L 497 L 498 L 500 A 502 Str. 504 Str. 506 Str. 510 L 511 A 516 L 517 L 519 L 52 J L 523 L 524 L 526 L 527 Zofing. 529 CONTENTS. LET. CCXXXI. George Buchanan to Rodolph Gualter, July 24, 1579. CCXXXII. Archbp Sandys to Rodolph Gualter ...London, Dec. 9, 157f». CCXXXIII. Rodolph Gualter to George Buchanan, Zurich, March 8, 1580. CCXXXIV. Hierome Zanchius to Sir F. Walsingham, Neustadt, Sept. 24, 1581 CCXXXV. Queen Elizabeth to the Swiss Cantons, Oatlands, Sept. 1, 1583. CCXXXVI. Queen Elizabeth to the four cities, &c. Oatlands, Sept. 1, 1583. CCXXXVII. Queen Elizabeth to the Swiss Cantons, Greenwich, July 18, 1590. CCXXXVIII. Dutch church in London to the lord Treasurer, Lond., Apr. 16, 1591 CCXXXIX. Queen Elizabeth to the king of Poland, Greenwich, April 16, 1591 , CCXL. Lord Stafford to Wolfgang Meier Greenwich, Aug. 6, 1593. CCXLI. State of Zurich to Queen Elizabeth ...Zurich, Aug. 12, 1600, CCXLIL Caspar Thoman to Caspar Waser Oxford, Feb. 1601. CCXLIII. John Johnston to Caspar Waser St Andrew's, Aug. 1, IGOl. CCXLIV. The same to the same St Andrew's, Feb. 8, 1602. PAGE Op. 530 L 531 A 533 .Op. 534 S.C. 536 Schaff. 538 A 540 . S.C. 542 S.C. 543 Str. 545 A 545 S.C. 547 S.C. 551 S.C. 554 CORRIGENDA. p. 228 1. 18 and p. 247 1- 9 from bottom, for bands read tippets, p. 228 1. 19, for a long gown and tippet, read a long woollen gown, p. 247 1. 9 from bottom, /or hoods read vestments, (or copes.) ZURICH LETTERS. I. SIR A. COOK TO H. BULLINGER^ [B. 1.]' Strasburgh, December 8, 1558. Most excellent and justly honoured prelate, my friend and beloved brother in Christ, Dr Sandys, has brought me your very gratifying letter, in which you not only congratulate us English- men, and rejoice on our behalf, that the most merciful God has visited our affliction, and wrought out the redemption of his people, (which feeling of yours is truly most worthy of a good and pious minister ;) but also, like a nurse who cherishes her children, you are anxious that no evil beast should hurt us, nor any misfortune interrupt this happiness that is now begun. Your advice indeed is most prudent and affectionate, and you point out to us those very things from which we have most to fear. I wish that those who will now be of the queen's councils may anticipate these evils, and diligently guard against them. There is however great hope, espe- cially if the reports from Antwerp are to be depended upon, that the spirits of the papists are entirely cast down, and that they Avill not offer to attack us, unless om' own discord should afford them an opportunity. The thing now to be deprecated is, lest any dispute and party -feeling should arise about [the queen's] marriage ; for if that should take place under favourable auspices, every thing else will go on far more happily and with greater security. As to Philip's paying his addresses to her^, I am not surprised at it, es- pecially as the precedent is a new one : but if he consults his own interests, he will prefer the friendship of the queen to a marriage with her ; and as to herself, she would not now, I think, marry a foreigner if she could ; nor do I see how, if she were so inclined, she could do it without the greatest danger. But in this matter I look very little to human counsels ; for it is most true, as you write, that the disposal of kingdoms is in the hand of God. If the queen, mindful of the great mercy she has received, will but place her confidence in God ; — if she will daily say unto the Lord, Thou art [1 This letter has no address, but is stated in the Index to the volumes in the Archives to have been written to BuUinger.] [-' The references in brackets indicate the order of the different letters in the series to which they respectively belong, A denoting the first series, B the second.] P See below. Letter III. p. G, note 1.] 1 2 SIR A. COOK TO H. BULLINGER. 1 LET. my fortress, my rock, and my refuge, there will neither be wanting to herself the spirit of a Judith or a Deborah, nor wisdom to her counsellors, nor strength to her army. On the other hand, the counsels of her enemies will be defeated, their swords blunted, and the horse with his rider will fall to the ground. God grant that this may be the case, through Christ Jesus our Lord ! Amen. We are expecting another letter from England in two or three days, and will take care that, should there be any news, good or bad, you shall be informed of it, whom we shall evermore reverence and acknowledo-e as masters and brethren who have so well deserved o at our hands. Farewell. Strasburgh, Dec. 8, 1558. Your excellency's most devoted, Antony Cook. II. T. SAMPSON TO P. MARTYR. [A. 1.] Strasburgh, December 17, [1558]. I ENTREAT you for Clirist's sake, my excellent father, not to refuse me an answer to these few inquiries, as soon as possible. I. How ought we to act with respect to allowing or disallowing the title of " after Christ supreme head of the Church of England,"" &c. ? All scripture seems to assign the title of head of the church to Christ alone. II. In case the queen should invite me to any ecclesiastical office, such, I mean, as the government of a church, can I accept such appointment with a safe conscience, seeing that these things appear to me a sufficient excuse for non-compliance? 1. Because, through the want of church discipline, the bishop, or pastor, is un- able properly to discharge his office. 2. Because there are so many civil burdens imposed upon the bishop, or pastor ; those, for instance, of first fruits, as we call them, that is to say, the receipts of the first year, besides tenths ; in addition to which, at least in the case of bishops, so much expense must always be incurred for their equipages, retainers, and attendance at court : so that, as you well know, a very small portion of their revenue is left for the discharge of the necessary duties of a bishop, namely, for the support of learned men, the relief of the poor, and other occasions of making his ministry more acceptable. 3. I am now writing with reference to the bishops more especially ; and such is the degeneracy from the primitive institution, as regards their election, (for there is re- quired neither the consent of the clergy, nor of the people ;) such too is the vanity, not to say the unseemUness of their superstitious H.] T. SAMPSON TO P. MARTYR. 3 dresses, that I scarcely think it endurable, even if we are to act in all things according to the law of expediency. As far as I am personally concerned, I am not writing as if I were expecting any thing of the kind; so far from it, that I pray God from my heart that no such burden may ever be imposed upon me : but I ask your advice, as that of a most faithful father, that in case of any such event taking place, I may be the better pre- pared how to act. I should reply somewhat in this way, tViat I am quite ready to undertake the office of a preacher, in whatever place she [the queen] may choose ; but that I cannot take upon myself the government of the church, until, after having made an entire reformation in all ecclesiastical functions, she will concede to the clergy the right of ordering all things according to the word of God, both as regards doctrine and discipline, and the property of the church. And if it be demanded what kind of a reformation I wish for, you can easily conjecture, from the three articles above stated, what, in my opinion, ought to be required. I deposit, my father, with all simplicity, with yourself alone the secrets of my heart ; and I entreat you, for Christ's sake, to keep my secret to yourself, and return me an answer as soon as possible, as to what you think I ought to do in this case. Tell me also, what you would urge in addition for the furtherance of the reformation, and something too upon the reformation itself. Send your letter to Heton^, who will take care it shall be for- warded to me. But I implore you, for Christ's sake, to write to me with what haste you can. I shall shortly move towards Eng- land. We have papists, anabaptists, and very many gospellers, who are enemies both to learning and a godly reformation. Who is sufficient to defend the glory of Christ, and raise the banner of Christ against such adversaries ? Oh ! my father, pray God for me without ceasing. Wholly yours, T. Sampson. III. E. SANDYS TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 2.] Strasburgh, December 20, 1558. Much health in Christ. I am rather dilatory in writing to you, most esteemed sir ; but it is only just now that I have any thing certain to communicate. \} Thomas Heton was a merchant in London, and bad been a liberal contributor to the relief of the Marian exiles.] 1—2 4 E. SANDYS TO II. BULLINGER. [lET. We yesterday received a letter from England, in which the death of Mary\ the accession of Elizabeth, and the decease of car- dinal Pole is confirmed. That good cardinal, that he might not raise any disturbance, or impede the progress of the gospel, departed this hfc the day^ after his friend [queen] Mary. Such was the love and harmony between them, that not even death itself could separate them. We have nothing therefore to fear from Pole, for dead men do not bite. ]\Iary, not long before her death, sent two members of her council to her sister EHzabeth, and commanded them to let her know in the first place, that it was her intention to bequeath to her the royal crown, together with all the dignity that she was then in possession of by right of inheritance. In return however for this great favour conferred upon her, she required of her these three things : first, that she would not change her privy council ; secondly, that she would make no alteration in rehgion ; and thirdly, that she would discharge her debts, and satisfy her creditors. EUzabeth replied in these terms : " I am very sorry to hear of the queen's illness ; but there is no reason why 1 should thank her for her intention to give me the crown of this Idngdom. For she has neither the power of bestowing it upon me, nor can I lawfully be depris^ed of it, since it is my pecuHar and hereditary right. With respect to the council, I think myself," she said, " as much at liberty to choose my counsellors, as she was to choose her own. As to religion, I promise thus much, that I will not change it, pro- vided only it can be proved by the word of God, which shall be the only foundation and rule of my religion. And when, lastly, she requires the payment of her debts, she seems to me to require nothing more than what is just, and I will take care that they shall be paid, as far as may lie in my power."" The messengers were dismissed Avith this answer. Queen Elizabeth, on the Sunday^ after her accession, caused [^ Queen Mary died on the morning of Friday, Nov. 17, 1558. Strype, Memor. iii. ii. 118.] [2 Namely, on Nov. 18, 1558, about sixteen hours after the death of queen Mary, according to Hume's account; to which Strype adds, that his death took phice at Lambeth between five and six o'clock in the morning. Memor. III. ii. 118. He states however, in another place, Annals, i. i. 62, that he died on the 17th.] [3 Viz. on the 20th of November. The preacher was Dr Bill, her chap- lain and almoner, a prudent and learned man. Sti-j'po, IMemor. iii. ii. 118. Annals, i. i. 60. He was afterwiu-ds dean of Westminster, and provost of Eton.] III.] E. SANDYS TO H. BULLINGER. 5 the gospel to be preached at the celebrated Paul's Cross, which took place to the great dehght of the people. But on the following Sunday the bishop of Chichester, by name Christopherson, (the same who some time ago called at your house on his way to Italy,) and a notorious papist*, occupied the same place, and in his sermon, with great vehemence and freedom, (for the papists are always bold enough,) refuted every thing that had been said on the Sunday preceding ; loudly exclaiming, " Beheve not this new doctrine ; it is not the gospel, but a new invention of new men and heretics, &c." In this way the good papist strove to confirm his own opinions, and to take away the truth of the gospel. As soon as this came to the ears of the queen, she caused this good bishop to be summoned into her presence ; and after he had been examined respecting his sermon, commanded him to be sent to prison. The queen has changed almost all her counsellors^, and has taken good Christians into her service in the room of papists'' ; [■* He had been an examiner of heretics in the late reign, and in a com- mission for burning the bodies of Bucer and Fagius at Cambridge, where he was master of Trinity College. He died within a month after this sei-mon was preached, and was buried on Dec. 28, at Christ-church, London, with all the popish ceremonies. See Strype, Annals, i. i. 46.] [5 The queen's [Mary's] counsellors towards the latter end of her reign were those that follow; whereof, says Stryjie, Memor. in. ii. 160, those that have asterisks were laid aside the next reign, as I took them out of a journal of the Lord Bm-leigh's ; the rest continued pri\'7 counsellors to queen Eli- zabeth, viz. * Reginald, Cardinal Pole. * Nicholas, Archbishop of York, Lord Chancellor. Powlet, Marquis of Winchester, Lord Treasurer. Fitz- allen, Earl of Arundel. Talbot, Earl of Shrewsbury. * Henry, Earl of Bath. Stanley, Earl of Derby. Herbert, Earl of Pembroke. Edward, Lord Clinton, Lord Admiral. Lord Howard of Effingham. * Brown, Viscount Montague. * Thirlby, Bishop of Ely. * WiUiam, Lord Paget. * Lord Wentworth. * Richard, Lord Ryche. * Edward, Lord Hastings of Loughborough. * Sir Thomas Coniwalleys. * Sir Francis Englefield. * Sir Edward Waldgrave. * Sir John Mordaunt. Sir Thomas Cheyney. Sir William Petre. Sir John Mason. Sir Richard Sackvil. * Sir Thomas Warton. * Sir John Brown. * Dr Wotton, Dean of Canterbury. * Dr Boxal. * Sir Henry Jemcgam. * Sir Henry Beddingfield. * Sir Edmund Peckham. * Sir Robert Peekham. * Sir WiUiam Cordell. * Sir Clement Higham. * Sir Richard Southwel.] [•5 Hume states that the queen [Elizabeth], not to alann the partizans of the Roman Catholic religion, had retained eleven of her sister's counsellors ; but in order to balance their authority, she added eight more, who were known to be inclined to the Protestant Communion ; the Marquis of North- ampton, the Earl of Bedford, Sir Thomas Parry, Sir Edward Rogers, Sir Ambrose Cave, Sir Francis Knolles, Sir Nicholas Bacon, whom she created Lord Keeper, and Sir WiUiam Cecil, Secretary of State.] 6 E. SANDYS TO H. BULLINGER. [lET. and there is great hope of her promoting the gospel, and adA^ancing the kingdom of Christ to the utmost of her power. That she may- do this, God must be entreated by all religious persons. Philip^ has sent over to her a splendid and magnificent embassy ; but we know not what he means by it. If, however, he is thinking about what your prudent fears anticipated, he will lose his labour, and get nothing by it. [Sir Thomas] Wroth, [Sir Antony] Cook, and other persons of distinction, have begun their journey this day ; I, with God's blessing, shall follow them to-morrow. As soon as I arrive in England, I will take care to let you know the state of affairs there. In the mean time, entreat God in behalf of the Church of England, and of us, miserable ministers of the word, upon whom a heavy and difficult burden is imposed. We in our turn will earn- estly pray to God in behalf both of your church and yourselves. It is now midnight, and I am to quit this place early to-morrow, morning; wherefore, most esteemed sir, I bid you farewell. In haste. Strasburgh, Dec. 20th, or if you choose, the 21st, 1558. Your most devoted, Edwin Sandys, Anglus. IV. J. HALLER TO H. BULLINGER. [B. 2.] Berne, January 11, 1559. I HAVE extricated myself by the Lord's blessing from the lega- tion to Lausanne, lately committed to me ; for nothing more trou- blesome could have befallen me. Other persons are sent, who will manage every thing far better than I could have done. Meanwhile, I know not what will happen. We are expecting the result. Our English [exiles] at Aran have this day petitioned our senate, through Lever the bearer of this letter, for Ucence to depart, having re- turned thanks for the shelter that has been afforded them. They were therefore dismissed with free permission, and with great con- gratulation from all godly persons. We are afraid, however, that they have returned too soon ; but as we consider their presence will be necessary, we cannot blame their resolution. Meanwhile \} Philip, who had long forosoou this event, [tlic queen's accession], and Tvho still hoped, by means of Elizabeth, to obtain that dominion over England, of which he had failed in espousing Mary, immediately dispatched orders to- the Duke of Feria, his ambassador at London, to make i)roposals of marriage to the queen. Hume.] IV.] J. HALLER TO H. BULLINGER. 7 there are given to them letters testimonial of their conduct ; and as they employed me as their interpreter with the senate, I proposed also, upon the recommendation of master Consul Kegelin, what you lately suggested to me with respect to writing a letter to the queen. This proposition was so agreeable to the senate, that they are sending a letter to be dehvered to her majesty by the parties them- selves. There is therefore no occasion for your people to write to ours again upon the subject ; but let them rather address the queen independently of us, which you will easily manage with your friends. I have not at this time anything else to write. These good people are in haste, wherefore I have been obliged to hasten likewise. All our friends salute you, especially Musculus^. Fare- well. Berne, Jan. 11, 1559. Yours, J. Haller. V. R. GUALTER TO QUEEN ELIZABETH. [B. 3.] Zurich, ^January IGJ, 1559. Grace and peace from God the Father through Jesus Christ ! All godly persons, most serene queen, congratulate your royal majesty, for that God, who alone is wont to confer and transfer kingdoms, has raised you to the throne of your ancestors. But for my own part, I am of opinion that we should rather congratu- late the church of Christ herself; upon which, in this last time, wherein antichrist is putting forth all his powers in his last struggle, the Lord has caused a new star to arise, in that, according to the prediction of the prophet, he has given you to her as a nursing mother, who have hitherto been her faithful daughter. We ac- knowledge in this the wonderful goodness of God, who, when one would least expect it, looks upon his church, and relieves it from the pains of persecution. But for your majesty we implore a spirit of fortitude and wisdom, under the guidance of which you may continue to accomplish what you have already begun. For all godly persons are well acquainted with that pre-eminent faith, whereby, in the reigns of your father Henry and your brother Edward, princes of pious and holy memory, you embraced the light of gospel truth, and resolved stedfastly to maintain it amidst [2 Wolfgang Musculus was invited by the magistrates of Berne in 1549 to the professorship of divinity there. He died in 1563.] 8 R. GUALTER TO QUEEN ELIZABETH. [lET. dangers of every kind. And now many good men are every where proclaiming, that your majesty is seriously thinking of pu- rifying the church and restoring religion ; and I can easily believe that it is so, as I have been assured by credible witnesses, that (as Paul writes concerning his son Timothy) you have from your child- hood known the holy scriptures. Wherefore, relying upon the clemency and piety of your majesty, I have not hesitated to send this my letter, both to congratulate your realm, and deliver the sentiments of my mind respecting the restoration of religion, with greater freedom perhaps than becomes an unknown individual. Eor this I think is allowable in the ministers of the church, espe- cially in regard to those to whom God was pleased to entrust his church, when he foretold that kings should be her nursing fathers, and queens her nursing mothers. But here, most serene queen, two things appear to me especi- ally worthy of regard : first, that every reformation of the church and of religion be conducted agreeably to the word of God ; and next, that no opportunity be afforded to any among your counsel- lors, whose endeavours are tending to that object, either entirely to hinder this most holy and of all things most necessary work, or at least to persuade you that it should still be deferred. For, with respect to the first, we know that there are not a few persons, who, though they perceive that popery can neither honestly be defended, nor conveniently retained, are endeavouring by and bye to obtrude upon the churches a form of religion which is an un- happy compound of popery and the gospel, and from which there may at length be an easy passage to the ancient superstition. But since the apostle testifi.es that the church is born by the word of God, and that we must be born again in Christ, and made new creatures ; whatever is in any measure repugnant to the doctrine of Christ, must be put off and laid aside together with the old Adam : nor can any reformation of the church be really acceptable to God, unless it agree in every respect with his word : and for this reason the scripture commends the faith of David, of Hezekiah, and Josiah, because they reformed the church according to divinely prescribed laws ; while it reprehends in no obscure terms the sloth- fulness of others, who, though they wished to be regarded as the reformers and defenders of religion, yet retained the high places in which the people had been accustomed to offer sacrifice, contrary to the commands of God. And your majesty is aware of that saying of Christ, who declares that the new piece of evangelical doctrine will not suit tlie old garments of superstitions. And he also solemnly v.] R. GUALTER TO QUEEN ELIZABETH. 9 warns us not to put the fermenting and wholesome neiu wine of his gospel into old leathern bottles, unless we would have not only these to perish, but that to be spilled at the same time. From the experience of not a few instances in our Germany, we assuredly know it to be impossible ever to consult the peace of the churches, or the purity of religion, as long as any rehcs of superstition are retained. For as those who are weak ascribe to them much more than is right, so the ignorant are made to stumble by them ; and at the same time, by their means, the enemies of truth entertain the hope of some time bringing back and restoring superstition. I^or in a case of this kind is it expedient to listen to any rea- sonings of the flesh, which, though it has put its hand to the plough, is for the most part accustomed to look back, and seek out on every side occasions of delay. For, as the apostle bears witness, it is the very end and aim of the preaching of the gospel, that by the obedience of faith we should be subject to the word of God, who alone both suggests the most wholesome counsels of action, and at the same time assists them by his Spirit to attain a favourable re- sult. We have David for an example, who, notwithstanding he experienced many troubles in the beginning of his reign, and had to deal with many enemies, some of whom by open violence, and others by treacherous artifices, aimed at his destruction ; yet, being enabled by the blessing of God to overcome them all, he restored both the civil government and religion with great glory and incre- dible success. I might bring forward many examples of tliis kind ; but there is by no means any occasion to do so before your majesty, who has not long since seen something similar in king Edward, your brother, of most pious memory, who, when scarcely out of his boy- hood, was an object of admiration to all kingdoms by reason of his remarkable zeal for godliness and the restoration of rehgion, and bravely overthrew the tyranny of antichrist throughout his realm. By which example God would shew, that antichrist has very little, or rather no strength to defend his kingdom, as soon as the hght of the divine word has dispersed the darkness in which he is wont to hide himself. But because our ingratitude deserved it, a just God took to himself in peace our most godly king (as he did Josiah of old), that he might not see the dreadful dispersion of rehgion, which would doubtless have appeared more painful to him than death itself. But the same God, again manifesting his compassion for the kingdom of England and the church at large, has raised you up, that by the activity and zeal of your majesty might be happily completed what the most godly king your brother had 10 R. GUALTER TO QUEEN ELIZABETH. [lET. piously and successfully begun. Pursue therefore, most serene queen, -with unshaken resolution, what no godly person doubts that you have long since conceived in your mind ; and with your favour gladden the church, which is eagerly expecting from your majesty the true maintenance of doctrine and rehgion, and regard all delay as unlawful which is connected with danger to the soul of any individual whatever. This is the desire of all godly persons, and for which they are suppliantly praying to God, Avho can both bend to your subjection the minds of your people, and protect you from every danger, while labouring for his glory. I touch upon these things very briefly, because I am well aware that your ma- jesty is not wanting in either a correct judgment, or faithful and prudent counsellors. I may be considered, I confess, as wanting in discretion, for having offered this advice unsolicited. But I willingly incur the charge of indiscretion, provided only I may perform that duty, which both my public ministry in the church requires, and which I acknowledge myself to owe, by reason of personal benefits, to your England ; in which I was formerly received^, when almost a boy, with the greatest kindness, and from which time I have had among the English not a few friends, whom I regard as by no means the last in my esteem. Among these John Parkhurst easily holds the first place : a man pre-eminent for his erudition, and the stedfastness of his faith, and who has firmly retained, even to this day, that pure faith in Christ, which two and twenty years ago he began to profess, when I was residing in Oxford ; and has so confirmed the same, amidst the sore troubles of a lengthened exile, that he has often been a wonder to me, and I have rejoiced in hav- ing such a man for my guest, in whom I might have constantly be- fore me a lively pattern of christian faith and doctrine. Should your majesty think fit to honour him by any especial favour, you will do a service of which you will have Christ Jesus as the most faithful recompenser : and I dare engage that Parkhurst himself will be a labourer in the vineyard of the Lord not to be repented of. I send your majesty my homilies"^ upon the general epistle of the apostle John, dedicated to king Edward of pious memory, but [1 Gualter first came to England about the year 1537, in company with Nicolas Partridge. His diary of that journey is still preserved at Zurich.] [2 The volume is entitled : In Joannis Apostoli et Evangelista? Epistolam Canonicam Homilifc xxxvii. In ejusdem apostoli duas postcriores epistolas, Ilomiliarum sylvce. Authore Rodolpho Gualthero Tigurino. Tiguri, apud Froschoverum, anno M.D.Lni.] v.] E, GUALTER TO QUEEN ELIZABETH. 11 never read by him, because it seemed otherwise good to God the Father, who would not permit to an ungrateful world the longer enjoyment of so great and rare an intellect. I therefore request your majesty, that, if only for the most delightful remembrance of your brother, you will deign to receive and honour them with your patronage, until an opportunity be afforded me of more clearly testi- fying my respectful regard towards your majesty. May God the Father of mercy direct your majesty by his Spirit, protect you with his favour, and preserve you for many years in health and safety to his church and the kingdom of England ! Amen. Dated at Zurich, the chief city of Switzerland, in the year of man's salva- tion 1559. Your majesty's most devoted, Kodolph Gualter, Minister of the church of St Peter's, at Zurich. VI. R. GUALTER TO LORD F. RUSSELL [^B. 4.] Zurich, January 16, 1559. Grace and peace from God the Father through Jesus Christ ! Though, most illustrious prince, I am well aware of my low estate, yet for many reasons I feel myself moved and impelled to make known to your clemency by letter the affectionate regard that I entertain towards your country. For when all godly persons are congratulating England with all their hearts upon its having ob- tained a queen whoso piety had been already proclaimed through the whole world, and by Avhosc zeal it is universally hoped that true religion will be restored, which had for some years past been wretchedly on the decline; I should deservedly be deemed un- grateful, if in this general rejoicing I alone were to be silent, who for many reasons acknowledge myself deeply indebted to England. For, to say nothing of the incredible kindness which I formerly experienced in your country, and the personal favours that I there received, the public cause of the church of Christ most justly de- mands it of me, that although I can neither aid you by any counsel or authority in the restoration of religion, I may at least by some token or other manifest the affection of my mind. And this has been my chief reason both for sending a letter to the queen's ma- [3 This was Francis, second earl of Bedfoi'd, to which title he succeeded in 1555. He had gone out of England in queen Mary's time, and staid some time at Zurich. Burnet, nr. 411.] 12 R. GUALTER TO LORD F. RUSSEL. [ LET. jesty, and it also principally induces me to write to your clemency. I am encouraged also at the same time by your noble qualities, which many of our friends have frequently declared to us, and of which we were allowed to behold no obscure evidences, when in your journey into Italy last year by way of Zurich you made such diligent inquiry into all things which make for the cause of the church and of religion, that it was easy to be perceived that this cause was far more dear to you than all other things whatever. And indeed I was even then rejoicing over you in silence, inas- much as I perceived that the grace of God in you was not vain or inactive : but I now rejoice the more, both for yourself and England, as I understand that you are advanced by the queen's majesty to the liighest dignity \ in which you are enabled both to give public evidence of your godliness, and to deserve well of your beloved country, and render that service and worship to God, which is more acceptable to him than any other. For since he regards his church (as he testifies by the prophet) as more dear to him than the apple of his eye, and has vouchsafed to redeem the same by the death of his only-begotten Son ; he certainly will have it held in the highest esteem by all, and especially by kings, and the counsellors of kings, who he foretold by Isaiah should be its nursing fathers and guardians, which office appears to me to consti- tute the chief dignity of all sovereigns. For to rule over a wide extent of country, to extend their empire by land and sea, and re- strain their subjects by the force of law, is in the power of impious persons, and those who are ignorant of God, such as we know to have existed formerly in almost all kingdoms. But to kiss the Son of God (as the divine and royal psalmist speaks), and to cherish and defend his spouse, this truly is that glorious and incomparable ho- nour of princes, which is only conferred upon those whom God, of his special grace, has chosen to be vessels of his glory ; and who, enlightened by his Spirit, have consecrated themselves entirely to him. And indeed, most illustrious prince, many good men testify that you are of this character, and many too have experienced it up to the present time. And I entreat of God in my continual prayers, that he may evermore preserve you such, and direct both your counsels and those of others, to whose fidelity is now entrusted the management of afi'airs, to the glory of his name, and the ad- [1 Tho eavl of Bedford was creatjd a privy counsellor on Elizabeth's accession, and when the care of correcting the liturgy was committed to Parker and others, ho was one of the few to whom the matter was imparted. Camden, Elizabeth, p. 16.] VI .1 K. GUALTER TO LOKD F. RUSSEL. vancement of the church, and the welfare of the country : which object you will doubtless be permitted to accomplish, if only in the true fear of the Lord, which the most wise Solomon has declared to be the beginning of wisdom, you will bear in mind that those things which relate to the church and to religion are no where to be sought for but from the fountains of holy scripture. Nor does it become us here to be affrighted by any dangers, since the Lord, who ordains the counsels of action, directs also with his hand the events of such counsels ; so that, though they may sometimes seem to make httle progress, yet they will at length terminate in a most happy issue. And though all thmgs may deceive us, when, by reason of the world's ingratitude, God deprives even the most godly counsels of their effect, it is nevertheless no httle satisfaction to know that we have done our duty, so that the blood of those whom their own perverseness has destroyed, cannot be required at our hands. You must attribute, most illustrious prince, the freedom of my advice, not to temerity, but to my affection for England, and to your own clemency, the consideration of which has emboldened me to write as I have done. I should very fully commend to your clemency master John Parkhurst, were I not aware that he is much loved and valued by you, as I easily discovered when you so friendly and affectionately came to visit him at my house. And he is indeed worthy to be loved, as well for the singular godliness which he gave proof of by his exile, as for his sound learning, so opposed to any fondness for contention. Nor do I doubt but that he will prove of great use, if your clemency should think proper to use your influence for his promotion. May the Lord Jesus direct and defend your clemency to the advancement of his church and of pure religion ! Amen. Zurich, Jan. 16, 1559. [RODOLPH GUALTER.] VII. R. GUALTER TO R. MASTERS-. [B. o.] ZuiiiCH, January 16, 1559. Greeting. I congratulated myself not a httle in the years gone by, when, in the reign of Edward the sixth of pious memory, you first began to renew the duty of correspondence which had [2 Richard Masters was physician to (jueeii Elizabeth.] 14 R. GUALTER TO R. MASTERS. [lET. been interrupted for many years. But now, most learned sir, and esteemed brother in Christ, I have far more reason to congratulate both you and myself; as I understand that such times by the mercy of God are restored to your England, when, under the protection of a most godly queen, the liberty of worshipping God in truth will again be aiforded to godly men, and the letters of our friends can be conveyed to and fro without danger. We acknow- ledge in these things the wonderful wisdom and goodness of God, who is wont to temper with joyful changes the afflictions of his church, lest we should be entirely overwhelmed in the waves of temptation. May he also grant that the hopes of the faithful, which they have imiversally begun to entertain respecting the kingdom of England, may be fully reahzed ! And this I the rather expect wUl be the case, if so many of you as are there placed in any degree of authority, will bear in mind that the charge of the church and of religion especially belongs to you, and you do not follow their coimsels, who, perceiving that popery can neither honestly be defended nor entirely retained, adopt those artifices by which they invent a form of religion of a mixed, uncertain, and doubtful character, and obtrude the same upon the churches under the pretext of evangelical reformation, from which the return to papistical superstition and idol-madness is afterwards most easy. I do not write this, as knowing that there are any such persons among you, but as fearing lest there may be such. For we have now experienced in Germany for some years, to the great detri- ment of the churches, the extent of influence possessed by men of this character ; forasmuch as their counsels appear to the carnal judgment to be full of moderation, and especially adapted to the promotion of concord : and it is likely that the common enemy of our salvation will also find suitable instruments among yourselves, by the aid of which he will endeavour to retain the seeds of popery ; which must be firmly resisted with the weapons of holy scripture and of the divine word, lest, while we endeavour to avoid giving some small offence at the first beginning, many things be allowed, as if to endure only for a time, which it will afterwards be scarcely possible by any effort, and not without the most grievous struggles, altogether to remove. The churches of Germany have seen many examples of this evil, by the consideration of which we are taught to regard with suspicion whatever is in any respect at variance with the sincere doctrine of the word. And you must not think that I am induced to give you this warning from any other motive, than because I am so wonderfully attached to your England by VII. 1 R. GU ALTER TO R. MASTERS. 15 reason of my former intercourse, of which the mere recollection is even at this day most delightful to me. Our friend Parkhurst, my brother and most beloved guest, whom I wish most earnestly to commend to you, will give you every information respecting our affairs. He has now endured for five whole years the painful anxieties of exile, during which how- ever he has united incredible patience with admirable stedfastness of faith. He is at this time returning to his country full of joyful hope, that he may aid, according to his ability, the cause of the reviving church. And I doubt not but that he will do her good service, as he has a remarkable knowledge of the scriptures, and is most devoted to the truth, and has a thorough abhorrence of con- troversy, the lovers of which are scarcely ever of any use in the church. You will therefore do well to aid him by your influence, and bring him forward to the utmost of your power. And no circumstance will ever be more gratifying to myself, than to learn by a letter from you that the recollection of our friendship is still fresh on your part, which certainly can never be effaced from my own mind. Farewell, most excellent sir. Zurich, Jan. 16, 1559. [RODOLPH GUALTEK.] VIII. J. JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. [A. 3.] Strasburgh, January 26, [1559.] Respecting my first setting out, and all the news which was then circulated at Basle, I wrote to you by our friend Simler. So wretchedly were we delayed by the badness of the roads, that it was with some difficulty that, on the fifth day after, we arrived at Strasburgh. Here we found all our friends in good health, and very anxious for your company. We have not yet heard what Sandys, Horn, and our other friends have been doing in England. Nor indeed is it to be wondered at ; for, having left Strasburgh on the 21st of December, they would hardly be able to reach Antwerp in twenty days after, because the Rhine being frozen over would prevent their travelhng by water. All we hear is, that their return was very acceptable to the queen, and that she has openly declared her satisfaction. If the bishops go on as they have begun, bishopricks will shortly become very cheap. For Christopherson, that brawling bishop of Chichester, is certainly dead ; the same is also reported 16 J. JEWEL TO P. MAKTYR. [lET. of Watson \ bishop of Lincoln; which if it be true, there are at this time no less than fourteen sees vacant. Your friend White, as I wrote to you when I was at Basle, dehvered a most furious and turbulent^ discourse at the funeral of [queen] Mary, in which ho declared, that every thing was to be attempted rather than that any alteration should be made in religion ; and that it would be a meritorious act for any one to kill the exiles on their return. He was charged with sedition by the Marquis of Winchester, Lord Treasurer, and Heath, archbishop of York. The bishop of London has been ordered to restore to Ridley's^ executors the property which he had forcibly and injuriously taken possession of. He will shortly be called upon for his defence ; and is in the mean time ordered to confine himself to his own house as a prisoner. The queen has forbidden any person, whether papist or gos- peller, to preach* to the people. Some think the reason of this [1 He had the ague, but recovered, and was afterwards deprived. Strype, Annals, i. i. 139. 210.] p This sermon was preached Dec. 13, and the preacher was confined to his own house till Jan. 19, when being summoned before the Lords of the Council, "after a good admonition given to him," he was set at liberty. Strype, Memor. in. ii. 140, 536, where the whole sermon is preserved. The text was from Eccles. iv. 2.] P December ult., the council wrote to Sir John Mason and Sir Clement Throgmorton, to examine diligently a complaint made to the queen's high- ness by certain near kinsmen of Dr Ridley, late bishop of London, for divers parcels of his goods, that came into the hands of the bishop of London that now is, [viz. Bonner,] and to signify to them what they should find out therein. Strype, Annals, i. i. 47. Letters of the Martyrs, p. 27, Ed. 1844.] [•* The proclamation is thus given in Strype, Annals, i. ii. 390. By the quene. The quene's majesty, miderstanding that there be certain persons, having in times past the office of ministery in the church, which do now purpose to use their former office in preaching and ministery, and partly have attempted the same ; assembling, specially in the city of London, in Bondry places, great nomber of people ; whereupon riscth amonges the com- mon sort not only unfruteful dispute in matters of religion, but also con- tention, and occasion to break common quiet ; hath therefore, according to thanthoritie committed to her highness, for the quiet governaunce of all maner her subjects, thought it necessary to charge and commaund, like as hereby her highness doth charge and commaund all maner of her subjects as well those that bo called to ministery in the church, as all others, that they do forbear to preach or teach, or to gyve audience to any maner of doctrine or i)reachyng, other than to the gospels and cpistels, commonly called the gospel and epistcl of the day, and to the ten commaundmcnts in the vulgar tongue, without exposition or addition of any niancr, sense, or VIII.] J. JEWEL TO P. MARTYR, 17 to be, that there was at that time only one minister of the word In London, namely, Bentham^, whereas the number of papists was very considerable ; others think that it is owing to the circumstance that, having heard only one public discourse of Bentham's, the people began to dispute among themselves about ceremonies, some declaring for Geneva, and some for Frankfort". "Whatever it be, I only wish that our party may not act with too much worldly prudence and poUcy in the cause of God. Many persons are of opinion that [Sir Antony] Cook will be the Lord Chancellor : he is, as you know, a worthy and pious man, but I think hardly quahfied for that office. The bishop of Ely [Thirlby] is still remaining with Philip, while some arrangement is making, if it please God, about this famous peace' ; which, of what meaning to be applyed or added ; or to use any other maner of publick prayer, rite, or ceremony in the church, but that which is already used, and by law receaved ; or the common letany used at this present in her majesty's own chappel, and the Lord's prayer, and the crede in English ; until consul- tation may be had by parlament, by her majesty, and her three estates of this realme, for the better conciliation and accord of such causes as at this present are moved in matters and ceremonies of religion. The true advauncement whereof, to the due honour of almighty God, the increase of vertue and godlyness, with universal charitie and concord amonges her people, her majestie moost desyreth and meaneth eifectually, by all maner of means possible, to procure and to restore to this her realme. Where- unto, as her majestie instantly requu-eth all her good, faithful, and loving subjects to be assenting and ayding with due obedience; so, if any shall dis- obediently use themselfes to the breach hereof, her majesty both must and will see the same duely punished, both for the qualite of thoffence, and for example to all others neglecting her majesties so reasonable commaunde- ment. Yeven at her highness palais of Westminster, the xxviith day of De- cember, the first year of her majesties reigne.] [5 It is not to be passed over without remark, that there was a congre- gation of godly men at London, in the very mouth of danger, who met together for religious worship all the queen's [Mary's] reign. Among their ministers were Edmund Scambler, afterwards bishop of Peterborough, and Thomas Bentham, afterwards bishop of Coventry and Lichfield. Strypo, Memor. iir. ii. 147.] [^ For an account of the disputes among the English exiles at Frankfoi't, see Strype, Memor. iii. i. 404, &c. and Annals, i. i. 151, &c.] ["! Thirlby, bishop of Ely, and Dr Wotton, dean of Canterbury, were queen Mary's commissioners to treat with France about the restoration of Calais, and for making peace. To them queen Elizabeth sent a new com- mission, and in January 1558 [1559], by her council, writ to them to proceed according to that commission. The peace was concluded in the beginning of April between the queen, the French, and the Scots. Str}7)c, Annals, I. i. 37.] 2 18 J. JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. [lET. nature, or how firm or lasting it may be, God only can deter- mine. The lady Isabella will, I hope, be invited into England. For I perceive others also of our party seriously thinking upon that matter. Zanchius too will write to the queen : he was on the point of TTi'iting to the whole parliament, if I had not dissuaded him ; for it seemed to me quite out of place. The boy Cranmer was left with Abel at Strasburgh, to be delivered into my care. I borrowed from Abel some crowns in the youth's name. I wish Julius would forward to him at Strasburgh the portmanteau, and the money which I left in your keeping. He will give you a receipt for it, which he will either deposit with Zanchius, or, if you choose, send onwards to yourself. Farewell, my most beloved father, and my soul's better half. I will not write all the news to you ; for I had occasion to write somewhat to master Bulhnger, a man to whom I owe every thing for his exceeding kindness to me. But tliis, whatever it was, he will, I doubt not, communicate to you. Masters Heton, Abel, Springham, and Parkhurst, salute you very much ; and though they desu^o for you all possible good, they desire for you at present nothing more than England. Salute in my name Muralt, Herman, JuHus, his wife, and all our mutual friends. Master Fr. Beti and Acontius are now at Strasbm'gh. They both salute you much. I have returned to Beti the letter of the lady Isabella. I pray you let her know this. Strasburgh, 26 January. Yours from my heart, and for ever, John Jewel. IX. SIR A. COOK TO P. MARTYR. [B. 6.] London, February 12, 1559- Tour letter, most excellent sir, together with that of master Bulhnger, I have myself placed in the queen's hands. How ex- ceedmgly she was affected by the perusal of them, Cecil can bear witness, for he saw her tears arise as she was reading them. She inquired whether you were willing to return to England ; for she had heard, it seems, something of the kind. I replied, that I had no doubt of your wiUingness, by reason of yom* exceeding love and regard towards the late king Edward, herself, and the whole com- monwealth of England ; but that at that time I had heard nothins: IX.] SIR A. COOK TO P. MARTYR. 19 certain from you by letter ; yet I wished that she would take mea- sures for having one of the universities adorned by your excellence. She wUl write, I hope, on this subject very shortly both to yourself and the Senate of Zurich. We are now busy in parliament about expeUing the tyranny of the pope, and restoring^ the royal authority, and re-estabhshing true religion. But we are moving far too slowly ; nor are there wanting^ at this time Sanballats and Tobiases to hinder and ob- struct the building of our walls. Wherefore we ought the more to think upon that exhortation, " Pray without ceasing." The zeal of the queen is very great, the activity of the nobihty and people is also great ; but still the work is hitherto too much at a stand. The advice. Trust in God, and lean not to your oivn under- standing, is not sufficiently impressed on the minds of some parties; neither that saying, He taketh the tvise in their own craftiness. But the result of this meeting of parliament will, as far as I can judge, confirm my hope. Salute much, I pray you, in my name master Bulhnger, and the rest of your brethren. Take every care of your health, and that you may be able to bear the journey. Farewell. London, Feb. 12, 1559. Altogether yours, Antony Cook. X. R. HILLES TO H. BULLINGER. [B. 7-] London, February 28, 1559. Much health. I received, my honoured sir, with a wilHng mind your letter to me dated on the 22nd December last. There was something, however, in it which I did not read so willingly, namely, that some persons had written to you more than once, that I disdained to receive your letters. For I never disdain to read the letters of any one, and especially yours ; as in my judgment it would be the greatest arrogance to slight the letters of so learned and venerable a man. But as long as our cruel and superstitious queen Mary reigned in this country, I Avas so afraid for my property, and of getting into danger, yea, even for my hfe itself, that I scarcely dared to write to persons of your character, or to [1 The Bill for the restitution and annexation of the firstfruits, &c. to the imperial crown of this I'ealm passed the House of Lords on Saturday, Feb. 4th. That for i-estoring the supremacy passed the upper house on Wednesday, Apr. 26. See D'Ewes, Jom-nals, p. 29.] [2 Namely, the Romish bishops. See the next letter, p. 22, note 1.] 20 R. HILLES TO H. BULLINGER. [lET. receive letters from them. Man, you say, is prone to fall, and in many things we all of us offend. It is not therefore to be won- dered at, if I also should have stumbled, and begun to stand in awe of and fear men, more than I ought to have done ; as well also as to entertain opinions which many years since I held in the greatest abhorrence. To that I was drawn over by reading the volumes of some of the holy fathers, in which, if I am not mis- taken, there are some doctrines, handed down too by the consent of almost all of them, but which are in no wise agreeable to the doctrine held by yourself and those Uke you. I do not choose however to write more upon this subject, because if you think fit to reply to my letter, I have neither time nor inclination to write an answer in return : it is so u^ksome to me to write Latin, and I am now almost entirely out of practice, as 1 am no longer in habits of intercourse with those learned men who express their thoughts in the Latin language. I certainly feel much obliged to you for having thought proper to recal to my remembrance, how I once knew that grace and compassion is most abundant with the Lord, who does not cast out, but receives with kindness, those who return to him. I confess therefore my past offence unto the Lord, I give glory to the Lord, and from the Lord I implore mercy, as you recommend me to do, nor have I any doubt but that I shall obtain it. And I will take care to be faithful for the future, and will promote, as you advise me, to the utmost of my power the true religion, of which the chief part is contained in the confession of faith' exhibited to the invincible emperor Charles V. at the as- sembly at Augsburg in 1530. Commend me, I pray you, to master Peter Martyr, and to JuUus his attendant, and to your most honourable wife. My wife heartily salutes you and all of them, and wishes you all much health. FarewcU. London, Feb. 28, 1559. Yours, Richard Hilles, Anglus. With respect to religion, silence has been imposed upon the catholic preachers (as they are called) by a royal proclamation-, [1 The Confession of Augsburg was first presented to the eraperor Charles V. on June 25, 1530. It was signed and subscribed by John, elector of Saxony ; George, marquis of Brandenburg ; Ernest, duke of Lunenburg ; Philip, landgrave of Ilesse ; Wolfgang, prince of Anhalt ; and the imperial cities of Nuremberg and Reutlingen. The matter was supplied by Luther, and reduced into form by the eloquent pen of Melancthon. See Mosheim, Cent. XVL chap. iii. 1, 2.] [2 See above, p. 17, note 4.] X,] R. HILLES TO H. BULLINGER. 21 and sufficient liberty is allowed to the gospellers, to preach three times a week during this Lent'' before the queen herself, and to prove their doctrines from the holy scriptures. The pubhc assembly too, or common council of this realm, or Parliament*, as our people call it, has now been sitting nearly six weeks. Nothing however has yet been pubhcly determined with respect to the abolishing popish superstition, and the re-estabhshment of the christian rehgion. There is however a general expectation, that all rites and cere- monies will shortly be reformed by our faithful citizens, and other godly men, in the afore-mentioned parliament ^ either after the pattern which was lately in use in the time king Edward the sixth, or which is set forth by the protestant princes of Germany, in the above-named Confession® of Augsburg. XI. J. JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. [A. 4.] LoxDON, March 20, 1559. Much health. We have at length arrived in England, that is to say, on the fifty seventh day after our leaving Zurich. But why should I enter into a long preamble, to you especially, who rather wish for facts, and set but little value upon these tedious narrations? It was, however, a wearisome life, when both water, and earth, and the very heavens themselves seemed angry with us, and in every [3 In the queen's fii'st Lent, on the 23rd of February, Mr Grindal preached before her majesty. In which Lent there preached also divers other learned protestant divines, and the fii'st of note in king Edward's time : viz. Dr Cox, Dr Parker, Dr Bill, Dr Sandys, Mr Whitehead : all of whom, excepting the second and third, had but lately come from exile. Strype, Grindal, p. 35.] [•* That sitting of the Parliament began on Wednesday, Jan. 25, and was dissolved on May 8.] [s The Act of Uniformity passed the House of Commons on April 20. The English service-book began to be used Sunday, May 12, in the queen's chapel ; and in St Paul's on the Wednesday following. Strype, Grindal, p. 35.] [8 There were thoughts now of receiving the Augustan Confession, tlie better to join in league with the German protestants. On this subject Bul- linger thus wrote to Utenhovius : " I see," said he, " no small disturbances like to arise in England also, if the Augustan Confession be received, which some Avould have; a thing very unworthy in many regards. This gives vexation to all the purer churches, and would infect them all with its leaven. I pray God restrain men otherwise pious, but sufficiently troublesome to godly men and the purer religion. And you know what was done in Poland. Beware, and lay to your helping hand, that it bo not received. King Ed- ward's reformation satisfieth the godly." Strj'pe, Annals, i. i. 259.] 22 J. JEWEL TO r, MARTYR. [lET. possible way opposed our progress. "What else? Every thing turned out most disagreeable and adverse to us, throughout the whole time. But I informed both you and Bullinger of these things more fully in a former letter, while I was delayed at Ant- werp. You shall now hear the sequel ; although, to say the truth, there is need of some art and flowers of rhetoric ; not so much for adorning and embellishing any new intelligence, (which I know not whether I have at tliis time any to communicate,) as for the pur- pose of retouching my old narrative over again. For almost every thing that I wrote to you about when on my journey, was at that time very different, and far more pleasant in the hearing, than I afterwards found it to be in reaHty on my return home. For the Roman pontiff was not yet cast out ; no part of rehgion was yet restored ; the country was still every where desecrated with the mass ; the pomp and insolence of the bishops was unabated. All these tilings, however, are at length beginning to shake, and almost to fall. The bishops^ are a great hindrance to us ; for being, as you know, among the nobiUty and leading men in the upper house, and having none there on our side to expose then' artifices and confute their falsehoods, they reign as sole monarchs in the midst of igno- rant and weak men, and easily overreach our httle party, either by their numbers, or their reputation for learning. The queen, meanwhile, though she openly favours our cause, yet is wonderfully afraid of allowing any innovations : this is owing partly to her own friends, by whose advice every thing is carried on, and partly to the influence of Count Feria^, a Spaniard, and PhiKp's ambas- sador. She is however prudently, and firmly, and piously following up her purpose, though somewhat more slowly than we could wish. And though the be2;innino;s have hitherto seemed somewhat unfa- vourable, there is nevertheless reason to hope that all be well at last. In the mean time, that our bishops may have no ground of complaint that they are put down only by power and authority of law, a disputation is determined upon, wherein ninc^ on our side, [1 These were Heath, archbishop of York ; Bonner, bishop of London ; White, of Winchester; Pate, of Worcester; Kitchin, of Llandaff"; Baine, of Coventry and Lichfickl; Turbervilc, of Exeter; Scot, of Chester; and Oglethorp, of Caiiislc; with Feckcnham, Lord Abbot of Westminster. Strj'pc, Annals, i. i, 82.] [^ He hated Elizabeth from the beginning of her reign, and stirred up pope Pius IV. to excommunicate her, and the king of Spain to bo her enemy. Strj^ic, Annals, i. ii. 53.] [3 Dr Cox in liis letter to Wcidner (Letter xvii. below) mentions but XI.] J. JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. 23 namely, Scory*, Cox, Whitehead •^ Sandys, Grindal, Horn, Aylmer, a Cambridge man of the name of Gheast'', and myself, are to con- fer upon these matters before the comicil with five" bishops, the abbot of Westminster, Cole, Chedsey, and Harpsfield. Our first proposition is, that it is contrary to the word of God, and the practice of the primitive church, to use in the pubhc prayers and administration of the sacraments any other language than what is understood by the people. The second is, that every provincial church, even without the bidding of a general council, has power either to estabhsh, or change, or abrogate ceremonies and ecclesi- astical rites, wherever it may seem to make for edification. The third is, that the propitiatory sacrifice, which the papists pretend to be in the mass, cannot be proved by the holy scriptures. The first discussion is to take place on the 31st of ]\Iarch. The bishops in the mean time have been long mightily exulting, as though the victory .were already achieved. When Froschover^ comes over to this country, I will write you a more particular ac- count of these matters. The queen regards you most highly : she made so much of your letter, that she read it over with the greatest eagerness a second and third time. I doubt not but that your book, when it arrives, will be yet more acceptable. Two famous virtues, namely, ignorance and obstinacy, have wonderfully increased at Oxford since you left it : religion, and all eight disputants ; as does also the account kept in the Paper office. The bishop of Carlisle on the papists' side, and Sandys on that of the protestants, are misadded, says Strype, to the aforesaid disputants, though probably they were present at the conference. Annals, i. i. 129.] [* He had been chaplain to Cranmer and Ridley, and was bishop of Chi- chester in king Edward's reign. He afterwards became bishop of Hereford. Strype, Memor. ii. ii. 171.] [^ An exile for religion in queen Mary's time. He had been recom- mended by Cranmer for the see of Armagh. Strype, Memor. in. i. 231.] [s Edmund Gheast, or Guest, was consecrated bishop of Rochester, and afterwards translated to Salisbury. Strype, Parker, ii. 80.] [' The four bishops, (see Note 3.) were White, Watson, Baine, and Scot, bishops of Winchester, Lincoln, Coventry and Lichfield, and Chester ; and the Doctors Cole, dean of St Paul's ; Langdah, Harpsfield, and Chedsey, archdeacons of Lewes, Canterbury, and Middlesex. Stryjic, Annals, i. i. 129. The abbot of Westminster, Fcckcnham, appears hence to have taken no pai-t in the conference.] [8 Ho was a printer at Zurich, and boarded twelve of the exiles in the reign of queen Mary. Among them were Laurence Humphrey, afterwards king's Professor of Divinity at Oxford, and bishop I'arkhurst. Strype, Memor. m. i. 232.] ■24f J. JEWEL TO P, MARTYR. [lET. hope of good lecarnlng and talent is altogether abandoned. Brooks\ bishop of Gloucester, a beast of most impure life, and yet more impure conscience, a short time before his death exclaimed in a most woeful manner, that he was now condemned by his own judg- ment. Your renowned [antagonist] Smith ^, the patron of chastity, has been taken in adultery, and on that account is ordered to retire from the theological chair, by a new practice, and without a pre- cedent, as the like was never done in Mary's time. Bruerne^ too has been compelled, for a similar offence, only far more flagitious, to relinquish his professorship of Hebrew. I write nothing about ]\IarshaP, for fear of defihng my paper. You have before heard respecting Weston^. But why, say you, do you make mention of such persons ? Simply, that you may learn by what judges it was though fit that Cranmer, Kidley, and Latimer should be condemned. I have no news to tell respecting the Scots, whether about peace or war, I wrote you three letters during my journey, but know not whether they have reached you. But since we are so far distant, much farther indeed and for a much longer time than I could wish, our letters must sometimes be committed to the winds and to fortune. Farewell, my father, and most esteemed master in Christ. Salute masters Bullinger, Gualter, Simler, Gesner, Lavater, Julius, his wife, your little Martyr, Herman, and your associates of Treves. All our friends salute you. London, 20 March, 1559. Yours, John Jewel. [1 He had been the pope's subdelegate under cardinal Puteo in Cran- mer's trial ; and assisted also at that of Hooper. Stvype, Cranmer, 532. &c. Memor. in. i. 286.] [2 Richard Smith, Regius Professor of Divinity at Oxford, had been de- prived of his professorship before in 1547, and was succeeded by Peter Martyr, against whom he printed his book for the Celibacy of Priests and Monastic Vows. Strype, Memor. n. i. 63, &c.] [3 He was chosen provost of Eton without the queen's consent, and by her forced to resign in 1561. Strype, Parker, i. 205.] [4 Richard Marshal, dean of Christchurch, was a violent papist under queen Mary, and an enemy both to Jewel and Peter Martyr. He watched narrowly to have caught Jewel, when he fled from Oxford ; and digged up the body of Peter Martyr's wife out of her grave in Christ's Church, where she had been some years buried, and cast it into his dunghill. Strype, Annals, i. ii. 48, and Parker, i. 199. He was mentioned in a list of certain evil-disposed persons of whom complaint hath been made ; which lm"k so secretly, that process cannot be served upon them. Annals, i. i. 416.] [5 Hugh Weston, dean of Windsor, was deprived of his deanery by car- dinal Pole for his scandalous life in adultery. Sti-ype, Mem. ni, i. 174.] XI.]] J. JEWEL TO P. MAETYR. 25 This is the first letter I have written to you since my return to England. I will thus number all of them in future, that you may know whether any have been lost. XII. J. JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. [A. 5.] a London, April 6, 1559. Much health. Accept a brief account of the disputation^ be- tween us and the bishops, which I informed you in my last letter was appointed for the 31st of March ; for it seems best thus to continue my narrative without any further preamble. In the first place, then, to remove all ground of contention and idle debate, the council ordained that every thing, on either side, should be read from written papers, and that the time should be so marked out, that on the first day nothing should be proposed by either party beyond bare afiirmations ; and that at the next meeting we were to answer them, and they, in their turn, to reply to us. Accordingly, we assembled at Westminster on the 31st of March. Great were the expectations of the people, and the crowd", I be- lieve, still greater. The bishops, (such was their good faith,) pro- duced not a single line either in writing or print ; alleging that they had not had sufficient time for the consideration of matters of such importance ; notwithstanding that they had been allowed ten days, more or less, and had in the mean time assembled their auxiliary troops both from Oxford and Cambridge, and every other corner. However, that so great a number might not seem to have come together to na purpose, Dr Cole, being suborned by the others, stepped forth in the midst, to harangue, in the name of them all, respecting the first point of discussion, namely, the use of a foreign language [in public worship.] After having assailed us most un- worthily with all manner of contumely and invective, and stigma- tized us as the authors and firebrands of every kind of sedition ; and having turned himself towards all quarters, and into every possible attitude, stamping with his feet, throwing about his arms, bending his sides, snapping his fingers, alternately elevating and depressing his eye-brows, (you know the look and modesty of the [** For a full account of this disputation see Strj^ic, Annals, i. i. 128, &c. Burnet, Hist. Reforni. n. 600, &c. and Soames, Hist. Reform, iv. 642, &c.] [7 The houses of parliament adjourned from March 24, till April 3, as Sir Simon D'Ewes thinks, by reason of this disputation. Strype, Annals, I. i. 98.] 26 J. JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. [lET. man,) he came at last to this, that England had now for thirteen hundred years received the gospel. And by what literary remains, he asked, by what annals, what monuments can it be made to appear, that the public prayers then in use in England were in the English tongue? When he had sufficiently careered within that circle, he added seriously, and with a solemn countenance and ad- monitory tone, that 'all should especially attend to and mark this, as a most precious saying, that the apostles from the beginning so divided their labours among themselves, that some of them esta- bhshed the eastern, and others the western churches ; and that therefore Peter and Paul, in the church of Kome, which at that time comprehended nearly all Europe, gave all their instructions in the language of E,ome, that is, in Latin ; and that the rest of the apostles in the east never employed any other language but the Greek. You will perhaps laugh at this ; yet I never heard any one rave after a more solemn and dictatorial manner. Had my friend Julius been present, he woidd have exclaimed a hundred times over, Poh! wJioreson knave !^ The speaker, however, made no scruple of betraymg, among other things, the very mysteries, and secrets, and inmost recesses of his own rehgion. For he did not hesitate gravely and solemnly to affirm, that even were all other things to agree, it would nevertheless be inexpedient for the people to know what was going on in religious Avorshlp. For ignorance, said he, is the mother of true piety, which he called devotion. Oh! sacred mysteries, and secret rites of the Bona Dea ! What do you imagine I thought all the wliile about the pontiff Cotta^? Tliis truly it is to worship in spirit and in truth! But to proceed. When he had thus taken up a great part of the time allotted to us for disputation, in calumny, abuse, and falsehood, we^ at last recited our arguments from written papers, with so much moderation as only to treat upon the matter in dispute, without wounding our opponents. The debate was at length concluded in such a manner, that there was hardly any one in the whole assembly, not even tlie Earl of Shrewsbury', who did not adjudge that day's victory to \} It is thus in the original manuscript, but it is suggested in a note by the transcriber that Jewel intended to have written Poz ! hosenknopf, a vulgar exclamation of that period.] [2 See Cicero de Nat. Deor.] [3 Robert Horn, formerly dean of Durham, and soon afterwards bishop of Winchester, immediately rose, and produced the writttn argument of his party upon the question under discussion. Soames, Hist. Rcf. iv. 648.] \} Francis, 5tli Earl. He had been distinguished in the Scottish military expeditions in the reigns of kings Ilem-y and Edward, and by that prudence XII.] J. JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. 27 be on our side. It was afterwards arranged^ that we should speak in the same manner respecting the second question on the Monday- following, and that on the Wednesday we should reply to their first day's arguments, and they in turn to ours. On the Monday, when a vast multitude of the nobility had assembled, exceedingly de- sirous of hearing the debate, the bishops, I know not whether from shame at [the defeat of] the preceding day, or from despair of victory, first began to shuflle, — that they had yet much to say upon the first question, and that the matter must not go off in that way. The council replied, that if they had anything further to say, they might be heard on the third day following, as it had been originally agreed upon; but that they were now to confine them- selves to the question before them, and not disturb the order of the disputation. Being driven from this position they nevertheless still evaded the question by saying, that if they must needs speak at all, they would not speak first ; — that they were in possession of the ground, and that we, if wc wished it, might try our strength in the first place ; for that they would be doing great injury to their cause, if they should allow us to depart last, with the applause of the people, and leave the stings of our discourse fresh m the minds of the audience. The counciP replied on the other hand, that it was originally settled that they, as being first in dignity, should be first to speak ; and that this arrangement could not now be altered ; they were surprised, however, at there being all this mystery, since one party must of necessity begin the discussion, or else nothing could be said by either ; and it was the more ex- traordinary, because on the first day's disputation Cole sprung forth to speak first, even without being called upon. At last, when a great part of the time had been taken up in altercation, and the bishops would on no account consent to yield the [privilege of speaking in the] second place, the assembly broke up without any disputation at all. It is altogether incredible, how much this con- duct has lessened the opinion that the people entertamed of the bishops ; for they all begin to suspect that they refused to say any thing only because they had not any tiling to say. On the day after, your friend Wliite*', bishop of Winchester, and fidelity to queen Mary, which induced Elizabeth to call him, although a Romanist, to her privy council, lie died Sept. 25, 1560.] P The Lord Keeper, Bacon, who acted as president, or moderator, in conjunction with archbishop Heath. Soames.] [G White had formerly attacked Peter Martyr in a book in verse, called Dlacosia Martyrion, prefaced by an abusive epistle. Strype, Memor. u. i. 423. Seoabove, p. 16.] 28 J. JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. [lET. and Watson, bishop of Lincoln, were committed to the tower for open contempt and contumacy. There they are now employed in castrametation, and' from weak premises draw bold conclusions. The rest are bound in recognizances to appear at court from day to day, and await the determination of the council respecting them. Thus you have the account of an useless conference, and one which indeed can hardly be considered as such. I have, however, described it more copiously than there was any occasion for, that you might better understand the whole proceeding. Farewell, my father, my pride, and even the half of my soul. Should there be at this time any farther news, I had rather it should be the subject of my next letter. Salute much, in my name, that reverend person, and my much esteemed master in Christ, master Bullinger, masters Gualter, Simler, Lavater, Wolfius, Gesner, Haller, Frisius, Herman, and Julius, your friend and mine. All our friends salute you, and wish you every happiness. London, April 6, 1559. Your John Jewel. This is the second letter I have written to you since my return to England. XIII. J. JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. [A. 6.] London, Jpril 14, 1559. Much health. Our friend Sandys has done me much wrong ; for, notwithstanding I had already written to you, though I earnestly besought him not to do so, he sent you his own letter unaccompanied by mine. However, except that I feel this duty of mine has long been owing to you, nothing has hitherto occurred which it would give you much pleasure to hear. O [queen] Maiy and the Marian times ! With how much greater tenderness and moderation is truth now contended for, than falsehood was defended some time since ! Our adversaries acted always with precipitancy, without precedent, without authority, without law ; while we manage every thing with so much dehberation, and prudence, and wariness, and circumspection, as if God himself could scarce retain his au- thority without our ordinances and precautions ; so that it is idly and scurrilously said, by way of joke, that as heretofore Christ was cast out by his enemies, so he is now kej^t out by his friends. This dilatorincss has grievously damped the spirits of our brethren, while it has wonderfully encouraged the rage and fury of our op- [i A word is here illegible in the original MS.] XIII.] J. JEWEL TO P. MAKTYR. 29 ponents. Indeed, you would hardly believe with how much greater boldness they now conduct themselves than they ever did before ; yet the people every where, and especially the whole of the no- bility, are both disgusted with their insolent exultation, and exceed- ingly thirsting for the gospel. Hence it has happened that the mass in many places has of itself fallen to the ground, without any laws for its discontinuance. If the queen herself would but banish it from her private chapel, the whole thing might easily be got rid of. Of such importance among us are the examples of princes. For whatever is done after the example of the sovereign, the people, as you well know, suppose to be done rightly. She has, however, so regulated this mass of hers, (which she has hitherto retained only from the circumstances of the times,) that although many things are done therein, which are scarcely to be endured, it may yet be heard without any great danger. But this woman, excellent as she is, and earnest in the cause of true rehgion, not- withstanding she desires a thorough change as early as possible, cannot however be induced to effect such change without the sanction of law ; lest the matter should seem to have been accom- plished, not so much by the judgment of discreet men, as in compli- ance with the impulse of a furious multitude. Meanwhile, many alterations in rehgion are effected in parliament, in spite of the opposition and gainsaying and disturbance of the bishops. These however I will not mention, as they are not yet publicly known, and are often brought on the anvil to be hammered over again. Sandys, Grindal, Sampson, Scory, (and why should I par- ticularize these ?) all of us remain still in London, all in good health, in the same condition, the same circumstances, the same favour. Many peifons make most honourable inquiry after you, where you are, how you hve, what you are teaching, and whether, in case you should be recalled, you would feel disposed to return to England. SidalF lately desired me by letter, not to give credit to any injurious reports respecting him. I remember, when you were lecturing at Strasburgh respecting the power that sovereigns have over bishops, you stated that Sylverius^ and Vigihus were removed from their office [of patriarch] by the emperor Justinian. "When [2 Henry Sidall, a vigorous defender of the truth in king Edward's time, recanted under queen Mary, anil sul)scribed to queen Elizabeth's supremacy. Ho was canon of Christ Church, and vicar of Walthamstowe. Strype, Cran- mcr, 285 ; Parker, i. 154.] P Sylvcrius, patriarch of Rome, was deposed and banished A.p. 537, 80 J. JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. [lET. you next write, I will thank you briefly to point out the place where this circumstance is recorded. We have as yet heard nothing respecting the queen's marriage, an event which we all desire most earnestly. Farewell, my father, and much esteemed master in Christ. London, April 14, 1559. Yours wholly, John Jewel. This is my third letter. I mention the number, that you may know whether, as may possibly be the case, any of them have been lost on the road. XIV. J. JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. [A. 7.] London, April 28, 1559. Much health. I have received three letters from you, and all of them nearly at the same time. Though they were, as they certainly ought to be, most gratifying to me on many accounts, both as coming from you, and letting me know the state of your affairs, and your affection for myself ; yet for no other reason did they seem more acceptable to me, than because they expressed a desire that I should write to you, and gently though silently charged me with either forgetfulness or dilatoriness ; of which the former is as much forbidden by the extent of your kindness towards me, as the latter is by the magnitude of my engagements. I have indeed written to you three letters since my return to England ; wliich I perceive, however, had not reached you at the time you wrote. And it may be, as is often the case, that they are cither loitering somewhere or other, and are, hke religion among ourselves, reposing in listless inactivity, or else have been lost on the road. But however it be, there can be no great loss in that respect ; inasmuch as they were almost empty, because there was not then much that either you would hke to hear, or I to write. The cause of the pope is now agitated, and with much vehemence on both sides. For the bishops are labouring that they may not seem to have been in error ; and this delays and hinders the progress of rehgion : but it is indeed no easy matter to ac- celerate its course, as the poet says, with such slow-paced horses. Feckenham, the abbot of Westminster, in order, I suppose, to exalt througli the machinations of the empress Theodora, and Vigihus was elected into the patriarchate by command of Bclisarius. lie was afterwards thi-own into prison by Justinian for opposing the decrees of the. second council of Constantinople (the fifth general council), in 553, and died at Syracuse on his return to Rome two years after.] XIV.] J. JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. 31 the authority of his own profession, in a speech that he made in the House of Lords, placed the Nazarites, the prophets, nay, even Christ himself and his apostles, in the monastic orders ! No one more keenly opposes our cause than the hishop of Ely [Thirlby], who still retains his seat in parliament, and his disposition along with it. The lands ^ of the bishops are to be made over to the exchequer, and the rectories which heretofore belonged to the monasteries will be given them in exchange. In the meantime there is everywhere a profound silence respecting schools and the encouragement of learning. This indeed is driving out one devil, as they say, by another. The queen both speaks and thinks most honourably of you : she lately told lord Russel that she was desirous of inviting- you to England, a measure which is urged both by himself and others, as far as they are able. But unless you should be seriously and earnestly and honourably recalled, I, for my part, ayIII never advise your coming. For myself, indeed, there is nothing that I desire more, or with greater impatience, than to behold you, and enjoy your most dehghtful conversations, (which I heartily wish may one day be the case), either in England or at Zurich. But, as far as I can perceive, that inauspicious arrivaP will present an obstacle to my wishes. For our [queen] is now thinking of [joining] the league of Smalcald* ; but there is one who writes to her from Germany, that this can by no means be brought about, if you should return to us. Who tliis person is, — if I tell you that he was once a bishop, that he is now an exile, an Italian, — a crafty knave, — a courtier, — either Peter or Paul, — you will perhaps know him better than I do^. But however this may be, we have ex- [1 For an account of this proceeding, see Stry]ie, Annals, i. i. 142, &c. The bill passed the House of Lords on the 6th of April, 1559.] [2 Martyr was invited to return, 15G1, it is supposed, by the influence of the Duke of Norfolk, but excused himself, from his obligations to the city of Zurich. See his letter below, dated July 22, 1561, and Strype, Annals, l. i. 382.] 3 Inauspicata ilia ct saxis et Saxonibus damnata Trapovcria. [* For an account of this, see Burnet, Hist. Ref. in. 170.] [5 Vergorius is the person here refen-ed to. Calvin in 1556 wi-ites to A. Lasco, " Nihil tamen mihi displicuit magis quam to consilia cum Vergerio miscere, cujus hominis vanitatem tibi non fuisse citius cognitam miror. Mihi certe quicquid ille aggreditiu- suspectum est." And Coelius Secundus Curio ^vriting to Musculus in 1550, speaks in severe terms of his "artes curtisana;," says that he is always moving about instead of minding his o^^^l little church "apud Rhajtos," where he has a salary of 150 aurei a year ; and adds, that ho knows he has a longing to got a footing in England. Note by the Rev. Stouart A, Pears.] 32 J. JKWEL TO P. MARTYR. [lET. hibited to the queen all our articles of religion and doctrine, and have not departed in the slightest degree from the confession of Zurich ; although your friend 'Ap-^iiiayeipo^, [Sir Antony Cook] defends some scheme of his own, I know not what, most obsti- nately, and is mightily angry with us all. As yet not the slightest provision has been made for any of us ; so that I have not yet abandoned the device which I designed for myself at Zurich, a book and a cross. I hear that Goodman^ is in this country, but so that he dare not shew his face, and appear in public. How much better would it have been to have been wise in time ! If he will but acknowledge his error ^, there will be no danger. But as he is a man of irritable temper, and too pertinacious in anything that he has once undertaken, I am rather afraid that he will not yield. Your books have not yet arrived, which I am the more surprised at, as so many of the English have long since returned from Frank- fort. When your present arrives, it will, I doubt not, be most acceptable to the queen ; and since you wish it, although it is in itself most excellent, yet, should I have an opportunity, I will set forth its value in my own words. As to the book which you sent me individually, I know not in what words to express my thanks. I choose, therefore, to sink under the weight of your present kind- ness, and the magnitude of all your former good offices towards me. And though I should most certainly never have dismissed you from my remembrance, yet excited as I am by this additional memorial, I shall entertain a more ardent and reverential affection for your name, as long as I live. Your other books have long since been brought over by the booksellers, and are purchased with the greatest eagerness ; for every one is most anxious to see by what hunting spears the beast has been pierced. Farewell, my father, and much esteemed master in Christ. Salute masters Bullinger, Bernardino, Gualter, Simler. I would add Frensham, did 1 not suppose that he was now at the bath, or on a journey ; for at this season of the year, when one hears the cuckoo, he is rarely at home. London, April 28, 1559. Your very affectionate and most devoted, John Jewel. This is mj fourth letter. [1 For an account of him, see Strype, Annals, i. i. 181, &c.] [2 Jewel probably alludes to a tract written by Goodman in queen Mary's time, entitled, IIow superior powers ought to he obeyed of their subjects, ^c. in which he spoke against the government of women, but was obliged to retract his opinions before the lords of the council. Strype, Annals, i. i. 184.] XV.] J. JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. 33^ XV. J. JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. [A. 9.] London. [No date.] Much health. And what, after all, can I write to you ? For we are all of us hitherto as strangers at home. Return then, you will say, to Zurich. Most earnestly do I wish, my father, that this may some time be possible : for, so far as I can see, there is no hope of your ever coming to England. Zurich ! Zurich ! how much oftener do I now think of thee than ever I thought of England when I was at Zurich ! But though, as I observed, we are yet strangers in our own country, we hear sometimes ineffable and inex- plicable things. Mischief, however, is often better kept at home^. As to religion, it has been arranged, I hope, under good auspices, that it shall be restored to the same state as it was during your latest residence among us, under Edward. But, as far as I can perceive at present, there is not the same alacrity among our friends, as there lately was among the papists. So miserably is it ordered, that falsehood is armed, while truth is not only unarmed, but also frequently offensive. The scenic apparatus of divine wor- ship is now under agitation ; and those very things which you and I have so often laughed at, are now seriously and solemnly enter- tained by certain persons, (for we are not consulted,) as if the christian religion could not exist without something tawdry. Our minds indeed are not sufficiently disengaged to make these fooleries of much importance. Others are seeking after a golden, or as it rather seems to me, a leaden mediocrity; and are crying out, that the half is better than the whole. Some of our friends are marked out for bishops : Parker for Canterbury, Cox for Norwich, Barlow for Chichester, Scory for Hereford, and Grindal for London ; for Bonner is ordered to vacate his see. When they will take possession, I know not. From this flowering I can easily guess beforehand, as you do of wine, what kind of a vintage it will be. Our enemies in the mean time are watching their opportunity, and promise themselves that these things cannot last. In Scotland we hear that there have been some disturbances, I know not of what kind, respecting matters of religion ; that the nobles have driven out the monks, and taken possession of the monas- teries ; that some French soldiers of the garrison have been slain in a riot ; and that the queen was so incensed as to proclaim the [3 HoXXaKt yap to kgkov KaruKeifievov tv8oi> annvov. Theognis.] 3 34f, J. JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. [lET. banishment of the preacher Knox by sound of horn, according to the usual custom in Scotland, when they mean to send any one into exile. AVhat has become of him, I know not. A commission is now appointed for the whole of England, with h view to the estabUshment of religion. Sandys will go into Lan- cashire, I into Devonshire, others into other parts. The queen declines being styled the head of the church, at which I certainly am not much displeased. Meanwhile, what the hangman^ of the church [cavezzo della Chiesa] may think, or murmur, or what trouble he may give us, you who are less distant can hear more easily than ourselves. Our papists oppose us most spitefully, and none more obstinately than those who have abandoned us. This it is to have once tasted of the mass ! He who drinks of it is mad. Depart from it, all ye who value a sound mind ; who drinks of it is mad^ They perceive that when that palladium is removed, every thing else Avill be endangered. A peace has been concluded between us and the French, on condition that Calais shall be restored, after eight years, into the possession of the English. It will need a marvellously strong faith to make my friend Julius believe this. However it be, we are ex- pecting sureties from France to that effect. Nothing is yet talked of about the queen's marriage ; yet there are now courting her the king of Sweden, the Saxon ^, and Charles the son of [the emperor] Ferdinand, to say nothing of the Englishman, [Sir William] Picker- ing. I know, however, what I should prefer ; but matters of this kind, as you are aware, are rather mysterious ; and we have a common proverb that tnarriages are made in heaven. Farewell, my father, and much esteemed master in Christ. Salute, I pray you, in my name, the excellent old man master Bernardino, with masters Muralt and Wolf. The book which you sent as a present to the queen, was delivered to her by Cecil. By some accident or other, it never came into my hands : as often, however, as I go to court, I inquire very particularly whether she has any thing to say about it ; but as yet I hear nothing. What- ever it be, I will take care to let you know. London. John Jewel. This is my fftli letter: you will find out Avhether any have been lost. [1 The pope is probably intended by this expression.] [2 Qui bibit inde fui'it ; procul hinc disoedite, queis est *■ IMcntis cura bonic : qui bibit inde furit.] [3 The sou of Jolm Frederic, Duke of Saxony.] XVI.] J. FOXE TO H. BULLINGER. 3$ XVI. J. FOXE TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 10.] Basle, May 13, 1559. Much health, most learned and very dear [friend] in Christ our Lord. Master Abel, an English merchant, has witliin these few days written to me from Strasburgh, in which letter of his were inclosed some from England, written to yom^self and masters Simler, Gualter, and Gesner. Should they reach you, I wish my letter, in which they were inclosed, to be forwarded to me at this place. Should they not reach you, I would not have you ignorant of the fact of their existence ; for I have been informed of it by another letter of Abel written to myself. These letters, as far as I can learn, were dispatched to you from England in the month of March, and sent here in April ; and now, in the month of ]\Iay, I understand they have not yet been delivered. I had moreover written to Frensham, who is with you, on the 23rd of April, and do not yet know whether my letter has been received. T am exceedingly anxious to learn the state of his health. Your excel- lence will condescend to advise him in this respect, and at the same time to afford him, in case of necessity, any assistance in your power. I am here harassed to the utmost of my strength, and almost beyond my strength, in collecting the histories of the Martyrs. Should you be in any way able to help me in this matter, I shall be glad of your assistance. And this you may do, if you will obtain from master Bernardino, and the other Italians resident in your city, a short statement of such occurrences of this kind as may have taken place in Italy ; and also, if you will put down in a few words, whatever your memory may retain respecting events which have happened in your own neighbourhood, noting at least the names of the individuals and the places. For although I am more immediately concerned with British history, yet I shaU not pass over the sacred history of other nations, should it come in my way. May the Lord Jesus direct your health, studies, and labours for his glory ! Basle. The day before the feast of Pentecost, 1559. Yours in Christ, John Foxe. 36 R. cox TO W. WEIDNER. [lET XVII. R. COX TO W. WEIDNER. [A. 11. ] London, May 20, 1559. Whenever I should leave Worms, my venerable friend, and much esteemed brother in Christ, I always determined with myself to write to you, and give you information some time or other re- specting the state and condition of our affairs ; which I considered it would not be disagreeable to you to hear, by reason of that ardent and sincere zeal with which you are always affected towards the gospel of Christ Jesus. I must confess that I have hitherto been constrained unwillingly to be silent, lest I should have to relate matters wliich would afford you no pleasure. Under the cruel reign of Mary, though but for the space of five years, popery so much increased both in numbers and strength, that it was hardly to be imagined how much the minds of the papists were hardened ; so that it was not without great difficulty that our pious queen, with those about her who stood forth with alacrity on the side of truth, could obtain room for the sincere religion of Christ. The bishops, the scribes and Pharisees, opposed it in our great council, Avhich from a French word we call the parUament ; and because they had in that place but few who durst even open their mouths against them, they always appeared to gain the victory. Mean- while we, that little flock, who for these last five years, by the blessing of God, have been hidden among you in Germany, are thundering forth in our pulpits, and especially before our queen Elizabeth, that the Roman pontiff is truly antichrist, and that tra- ditions are for the most part mere blasphemies. At length many of the nobility, and vast numbers of the people, began by degrees to return to their senses ; but of the clergy none at all. For the whole body remain unmoved, "Tanquam dura silex, aut stet Marpesia cautes," as the poet sings. The matter at last came to this, that eight' of their leaders, either bishops, or the most select from among their men of learning, were to dispute concerning some heads of rehgion with eight of our abject and exiled party. And, to avoid a war of words, it was agreed to manage the debate in writing. The day was fixed : we arc all present. The queen's council are present, and almost all the nobihty. It was decided that the opposite party should first deliver their sentiments about the matters in dispute. [1 Sec above p. 22, note 3, and Strype, Annals, i. i. 128, &c.] XVII.] R. COX TO W. WEIDXER. 3^ One of them"^, in the name of the rest, hke Goliath against David, comes vamitingly forward with his own statement, defends, and as it would seem, confirms it by irrefragable arguments, and congratu- lates himself as having already obtained the victory. One^ of our party rephed, relying on the truth, and not upon high-flown language ; in the fear of the Lord, and not with the boasted afi'ec- tation of learning. When the reply was concluded, an incredible applause of the audience was excited, to the great perturbation and confusion of our opponents. The other day arrives, appointed for a similar disputation. The opposite party is requested by the president* to proceed in the order before agreed upon, namely, that they should first declare their opinion respecting the next point in dispute, and that we should follow them. This however they refuse to do, being alarmed at the ill success of the preceding day's contest ; and cry out that it is unjust for them to begin the dispute, who had so many years continued in possession of the cathoUc church ; and that if we had any thing to say against them, we should bring it forward, that they might refute us by their authority, and silence us as degenerate sons, who had long since departed from the unity of the church. Thanks to Christ our Lord, they are very properly checked in their resistance to the order of the president, and lose their cause. The sincere rehgion of Christ is therefore established among us in all parts of the king- dom, just in the same manner as it was formerly promulgated under our Edward, of most blessed memory. I have thought fit to write this brief but certain intelhgence to one, who will, I know, truly rejoice in our joy ; that you may together with us return thanks to the Lord our God, who of his truly fatherly compassion has regarded and comforted us in our low estate of humiliation and distress. May he grant that these his so great and inestimable benefits may never be forgotten by us ! Your kindness will do me a great favour, if you will be pleased to communicate the above intelligence to my excellent friends master James Cornicius, the physician, and Vespasian Fittich. We are already endeavouring to break down and destroy the popish fences, and to repair under happy auspices the vineyard of the Lord. We are now at work ; but the harvest is plenteous, and the labourers few : let us ask the Lord to send labourers into his harvest. These few things I had to communicate to you, as my regard [2 Dr Colo. Sec above p. 25.] [3 Dr Horn. See above p. 26.] [^ The Lord Keeper Bacon.] H**-*! 1 4 ! o8 R. COX TO W. WEIDNER. [lET. dictates. May the Lord Jesus preserve you, and increase your piety even unto your last breath ! London in England, May 20, 1559. Your most devoted, Richard Cox. XVIII. J. PARKHURST TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 12.] London, May 21, 1559. Jewel and I received your very courteous letter at the be- ginning of April, by which I perceived your intention of sending your son Rodolph, at some appointed time, to improve his education at the university of Oxford. This, however, as things now are, I would not advise you to do ; for it is as yet a den of thieves, and of those who hate the light. There are but few gospellers there, and many papists. But when it shall have been reformed, which we both hope and desire may ere long be the case, let your Ro- dolph at length come over. I will not now tell you how much I shall be gratified by his arrival in England ; for I would express my regard towards him by deeds rather than words. The Book of Common Prayer, set forth in the time of king Edward, is now again in general use throughout England ^ and will be every where, in spite of the struggles and opposition of the pseudo-bishops. The queen is not wiUing to be called the head of the church of England, although this title has been ofi'ered her; but she willingly accepts the title of governor^ which amounts to the same thing. The pope is again driven from England, to the great regret of the bishops and the whole tribe of shavelings. The mass is abolished. The parliament broke up on the eighth'^ of May. The earl of Bedford has made a present of three crowns to our friend Wolfgang, who in this respect is more fortunate than many others. The bishops are in future to have no palaces, estates, or country seats. The present owners are to enjoy for life those they are now in possession of. They are worthy of being suspended, not only from their offico, but from a halter ; for they are as so many \} By the act for the uniformity of Common Prayer passed this parlia- ment. For a note of the differences between the two books, see Strypc, Annals, i. i. 122.] [2 For the Lord Keeper's speech at the dissolution of parliament, see Strype, Annals, i. i. 99.] XVIII.] J. PARKHURST TO H. EULLINGER. 39 Davuses, throwing every thing into confusion. The monasteries will be dissolved in a short time. I cannot now write more, for within four days I have to con- tend in my native^ place, both from the pulpit and in mutual con- ference, with those horrid monsters of Arianism ; for which end I have read with much attention your very learned treatise on both natures in Christ. I hope to come sufficiently prepared to the contest, and so to overcome the enemies of Christ. Christ lives, he reigns, and will reign, in spite of Arians, Anabaptists, and papists. Farewell ! most excellent and very dear sir. Overwhelm, so to speak, with salutations in my name your good wife, sons* and daughters, and most honourable sons-in-law. The good Lavater has done me a very great kindness in sending me so excellent a book, and one too which is Zurich all over. Salute for me masters Bibliander, Collin, Haller, Wolfius, Wickius, Frisius, Bernardino, Ammian, Meyer, Sebastian, Coler, Funckius, Pelhcan, Froschover, and all friends. My wife salutes you, your wife, sons and daughters, and all friends. She very frequently falls into tears when any mention is made of the ladies of Zurich. To your honourable magistrates, to the city and all the ter- ritory of Zurich, I wish every happiness. City of Zurich, farewell. Woe betide those who wish thee not all prosperity ! City of Zurich, farewell. In haste. London, May 21, 1559. Most entirely yours, John Parkhurst. P Namely, Guildford in Surrey.] [•* Bullinger had six sons and five daughters. Of the former, three died young ; two were ministers, and another died in France, in the troops of the prince of Orange, in 1569. Three of the daughters were married to ministers of Zurich : namely, to Hulric Zuinglius, son of the Reformer ; to Lewis Lavater; and to Josiah Simler.] 40 J. PAUKHUR8T TO C. GESNER, [lET. XIX. J. PARKHURST TO C. GESNER. [A. 13.] London, May 21, 1559. Hail ! again and again, most illustrious and very dear Gesner. As soon as I came to London, I sought out your friend Cains', that I might give him your letter ; and, as he was from home, I delivered it to his maid servant ; for he has no wife, nor ever had one. Not a week passes in which I do not go to his house two or three times. I knock at the door ; a girl answers the knock, but without opening the door, and, peeping through a crevice, asks me what I want. I ask in reply, where is her master? whether he is ever at home, or means to be ? She always denies him to be in the house. He seems to be every where and no where, and is now abroad, so that I do not know what to write about him. I shall certainly tell him something to his face, whenever I have the chance to meet him ; and he shall know what kind of a man he has to deal with. The pope is again cast out of England. This sadly annoys the mass-mongers. The pseudo-bishops opposed with all their might the pious designs of the queen ; and, to be brief, brought upon themselves a consummation much desired by all good men. They are now abhorred both by God and man, and never creep out into public unless they are compelled to do so, lest perchance a tumult should arise among the people. Many call them butchers to their face. Whatever other news there may be, I have already written in my letters to our other friends. As I think the trifle I now send you will not be sufficient, I will send more ; but it must be when I am richer than I am at present, (for we are all of us at this time poorer than Irus himself,) and you shall then perceive that I am not unmindful of you. Farewell. Salute in my name your wife, Frisius, Simler, and all my other friends. My wife salutes you all. In haste. London, May 21, 1559. Yours, John Parkhurst. \} This was the celebrated co-founder of Caius College, Cambridge, and court physician in the reigns of Edward VI., queen Mary, and queen Eliza- beth. Between him and Gesner an intimate friendship existed, and the latter, who was so eminent a scholar, philosopher and naturalist, as to have acquired the name of the Pliny of Germany, speaks of Caius in terms of the highest commendation, calling him, in an epistle to queen Elizabeth, " the most learned physician of his age."] XX.] J. JEWEL TO H. BULLINGER. 41 XX. J. JEWEL TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 14.] London, May 22, 1559. Much health. Your letter, most accomplished sir, was most gratifying to my friend Parkhurst and myself, both as coming from one to whom we can never forget how greatly we are indebted, and also, as retaining the deepest traces of that courtesy and kind- ness of yours towards us, which we so largely experienced during the whole time of our exile. And I wish we may be able, some time or other, in some measure to requite your kindness : but how- ever this may be, the inclination, at least, shall not be wanting. Your exhortation that we should act with firmness and resolution, was a stimulus so far from being unacceptable to us, that it was almost necessary. For we have at this time not only to contend with our adversaries, but even with those of our friends who, of late years, have fallen away from us, and gone over to the opposite party ; and who are now opposing us with a bitterness and obsti- nacy far exceeding that of any common enemy ; and, what is most vexatious, we have to struggle with what has been left us by the Spaniards, that is, with the foulest vices, pride, luxury, and licen- tiousness. We are doing, however, and have done, aU that is in our power : may God prosper our exertions, and give them a happy issue ! But at present we are so living, as scarcely to seem like persons returned from exile ; for to say nothing else, not one of us has yet had even his own property restored to him". Yet, although this long waiting is very tiresome to us, we doubt not but that in a short time all will be well. For we have a wise and religious queen, and one too who is favourably and propitiously disposed towards us. Religion^ is again placed on the same foot- ing on which it stood in king Edward's time ; to wliich event, I doubt not but that your own letters and exhortations, and those of your republic, have powerfully contributed. The queen is un- wilHng to be addressed, either by word of mouth, or in writing, as [2 A bill for this purpose passed the commons May 2, and was read a third time in the upper house. Yet, says Strype, I do not find it was enacted and passed into a law. Annals, i, i. 99.] [3 The 24th day of Juno was the day appointed by the late parliament, from which the new service book was to be only used in the churches throughout England. Strype, Annals, l. i. 200. He says, p. 199, that the new morning prayer began in September at St Antholin's, London, the bell beginning to ring at five ; when a psalm was sung after the Geneva fashion, all the congregation, men, women, and boys, singing together.] 42 J. JEWEL TO H. BULLINGER. [lET» the head^ of the church of England. For she seriously maintains that this honour is due to Christ alone, and cannot belong to any human being soever ; besides which, these titles have been so foully contaminated by antichrist, that they can no longer be adopted by any one without impiety. Our universities are so depressed and ruined, that at Oxford there are scarcely two individuals who think with us; and even they are so dejected and broken in spirit, that they can do nothing. That despicable friar Soto and another" Spanish monk, I know not who, have so torn up by the roots all that Peter Martyr had so prosperously planted, that they have reduced the vineyard of the Lord into a wilderness. You would scarcely beheve so much deso- lation could have been effected in so short a time. So that, although it would give me the greatest pleasure, under other circumstances, to see even a dog from Zurich in England, yet I cannot at this time recommend you to send your young men to us, either for a learned or religious education, unless you would have them sent back to you wicked and barbarous. The Lord Russel lately asked me in what way he could most obhge both yourself and your other brethren and fellow ministers. He felt, in truth, an inchnation to send you some acknowledgment of your kindness and hospitahty, which he is continually commend- ing. I told him, that nothing could be more acceptable to yourself and your friends, than for him studiously and boldly to promote the rehgion of Christ, and repress the insolence of the papists. This he promised that he would do, and he certainly does, as far as lies in his power. The ambassadors^ of the French king arrived to-day in Lon- don, to offer their congratulations about the peace. The head of the embassy is the young duke de Montmorenci. Nothing is yet said respecting the queen's marriage. The son of John Frederick [duke of Saxony,] and the second brother of [the emperor] Maxi- milian, are her suitors^ The public opinion, however, inchnes towards [Sir Wilham] Pickermg, an Englishman, a wise and re- [1 See pp. 34, 38.] [2 John de Villa Garsya. Sti-ype, Mem. m. ii. 29.] [3 For the account of their arrival, see Strype, Annals, i. i. 285.] [■* The queen was | courted almost at the same time by Charles, Duke of Austria ; James, Earl of Arran ; Erick, King of Sweden ; Adolph, Duke of Holstein ; Sir ^^William Pickering, a brave, wise, comely English gentleman ; the Earl of Arundel, of very ancient nobility ; and the Lord Robert Dudley, the late Duke of Northumberland's son, and the queen's especial favourite. Strype, Parker, I. 164.] XX.] J. JEWEL TO H. BULLINGER. 43 ligious man, and highly gifted as to personal quahties. May God prosper the event, whatever it be ! This the first letter that I have written separately to yourself since my return to England. But as I know that Peter Martyr, from the great intimacy that subsists between you, has communi- cated to you my letter to him, so I have no hesitation in regarding what I have written to him just the same as if it had been ad- dressed to yourself Farewell, my father, and much esteemed master in Christ. Salute that excellent lady your wife, masters Gualter, Simler, Zuinglius and Lavater. Should there be any thing in which I can conduce either to the comfort or advantage of yourself or your friends, I promise you not only my labour, zeal, and diligence, but also every effort both of mind and body. London, May 22, 1559. Your much attached, John Jewel. XXI. E. GRINDAL TO C. HUBERTS [B. 8.] London, Ma^^ 23, 1559, Health in Christ. I believe that William Salkyns, the servant of Richard Hilles, who lived with us a long time at Strasburgh, is well known to you. I lately handed over to him some writings of Bucer, to be delivered to you. One was, his public disputation when he took his doctor's degree ; another was concerning the entire controversy'' between himself and Yong, whom you used to [5 Conrad Hubert was preacher at St Thomas's, Strasbui-gh, and the editor of Bucer's Scripta Anglicana, which he dedicated to archbishop Grindal in 1577, both because he had been one of Bucci-'s chief friends at Cambridge, and also had procured most of the pieces then published. tSee Strype, Grindal, 298. This letter is preserved in the archives of St Thomas's at Strasburgh.] [(J The controversy between Bucer and Yong was thus. One of Bucer's questions (in a public disputation at Cambridge) was, that the good works which any seem to do before justification have the nature of sin. Hereat Yong took great oflfenco, and complained to the senate of the university against him, saying that Bucer was in a grievous error. The issue was, that Yong entered the lists of disputation with the reverend man against his tenet. Both of them penned their disputations, and Bucer sent a copy of his to Cheke to communicate to bishop Ridley, and in August 1550 wrote to Mr Grindal, president of Pembroke Hall, and chaplain to the bishop, desiring him to acquaint the bishop diligently with the truth of the case. (The letter is given in Bucer's Scripta, Anglicana, and also in Strype's Life of Grindal, 44) E. GRINDAL TO C. HUBERT. [lET. call fungus. Whether this latter contains any thing else, I know not ; for it is written in such a way as to require a conjuror rather than a reader ; except that to you perhaps, who are conversant with the writings of this individual, it will not be a matter of so much difficulty to find out and unravel the meaning. Dr Parker, who sent me these manuscripts, wrote word that he had also some other fragments; but when he had brought them forth from the hiding-places, in which they had been concealed during the whole of these incendiary times, he found them gnawed by the rats and entirely spoiled : so that if you should derive any pleasure from those you have, you will immediately lose it again, because you are deprived of all hopes of receiving any more in future. You told me that you had a copy of the answer to the Antididagma^ turned into Latin by Martin Bremius. We have nothing more of Bucer's here that I know of I doubt not but that Salkyns will faithfully dehver every thing at your Strasburgh Fair. Receive this brief account of our affairs in England. We found our church miserably torn in pieces, and all but overthrown. We were indeed urgent from the very first, that a general reformation should take place. But the parliament long delayed the matter, and made no change whatever, until a peace had been concluded^ between the sovereigns, Phihp, the French king, and ourselves. But now at last, by the blessing of God, during the prorogation of parliament, there has been published a proclamation to banish the pope and his jurisdiction altogether, and to restore rehgion to that form which we had in the time of Edward the sixth. If any bishops or other beneficed persons shall decline to take the oath of abjuration of the authority of the bishop of Rome, they are to be deprived of every ecclesiastical function, and deposed. No one, after the feast of St John the Baptist next ensuing, may celebrate mass without subjecting himself to a most heavy penalty. It is therefore commonly supposed that almost all the bishops, and also p. 467.) Buccr said that he confessed and believed what the king's homilies taught of good works. Yong and his party could not but acknowledge that they were pressed hard with the king's homilies ; and so, in effect, they con- fessed they made for Buccr against them. And yet these very homilies they had subscribed to. Abridged fi-om Strype, Memor. ii. i. 327.] \} The Antididagma was a work ascribed to John Gropper, one of the canons of Cologne, and published by the clergy there, in opposition to the book of Reformation drawn up by Bucer, Fistorius, and Melancthon in 1543, at the recpiest of Herman, ai'chbishop of that diocese. See Sleidan, Hist. Hef. Lib. XV. Vol. ii. p. 199.] [2 Namely at Cutcau Cambresis, in April 1559.] XXI.] E. GRINDAL TO C. HUBERT. 45 many other beneficed persons, will renounce their bishoprics and their functions, as being ashamed, after so much tyranny and cruelty exercised under the banners of the pope, and the obedience so lately sworn to him, to be again brought to a recantation, and con- victed of manifest perjury. AVe are labouring under a great dearth of godly ministers : for many, who have fallen off in this persecu- tion, are now become papists in heart ; and those who had been heretofore, so to speak, moderate papists, are now the most obsti- nate. But it is our part to do what we can, and commit the whole to God. In conclusion, I pray you to commend us and our church to God in your prayers ; and diligently salute masters Marpach and Sebald in my name. Farewell in the Lord, most courteous sir, and very dear brother in Christ. London, May 23, 1559. Your most attached in the Lord, Edmund Grindal, Anglus. I am in doubt (for I have a very bad memory) whether I op Lakin^ undertook to send you the whole* account of the exhuma- tion of Bucer and Fagius. But lest you should altogether be disappointed of your wish, I have positively determined to write on the subject to Dr Parker, who will, I hope, take care that a true description of the whole affair shall be prepared for me. Should he do this, I will take care that it shall be forwarded to you. If Lakin, who is now absent from London, will do the same, you may collect from each what is most important. Again fare- well. I doubt not, but that with your wonted kindness you will see that the inclosed letters are forwarded by the earliest oppor- tunity. XXII. J. FOXE TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 15.] Basle, Ju7ie 17, 1559. Health in the Lord. There was no need of your using any entreaty, my dearest Bullinger, whenever you might perceive any [3 Thomas Lakin was one of the exiles with Grindal at Strasburtjh.] [•* Jan. 26, 1556. Commissioners from cardinal Pole, viz. Watson, bishop elect of Lincoln, Scot, bishop of Chester, and Christopherson, bishop elect of Chichester, came to Cambridge ; and after a formal process, caused the body of Martin Bucer, late the king's professor of divinity, buried in St Mary's, to be taken up and burnt ; and so also was served the body of Paul Fagius, late the king's professor of Hebrew, buried in St Michael's church ; which was looked upon as barbarous. Strype, Memor. Eccl. iir. i. 510.] 4G J. FOXE TO H. BULLINGER. [lET, occasion for the employment of my services. Respecting the letters you mention, I have again called upon Peter Maclaine, a bookseller of this place, to whom those letters were directed by Abel, as he writes me word. My friend Lawrence was also with me, to whom Abel had directed (as he wrote me word) the entire packet of my letters. Peter replied to us in this way ; that some one came to him with letters, who was not a carrier himself, but either hired by a carrier, or else one who had bought the letters from the carrier, that he might afterwards resell them with greater profit [upon the carriage]. Peter, being displeased at the unreasonableness of his demand, and seeing that the matter was no business of his, but of the Enghsh, for the sake of sparing his money sent the man to the neighbouring pubhc-house, [the sign of] the Wild Man, telling him that he Avould there meet with some Englishmen who would take the letters off his hands. And yet I know that, besides ourselves, there were at that time no Enghshmen in the town ; and I cannot sufficiently wonder how it could come into Peter's mind to send the person to the Wild Man, when he knew well enough whereabouts in the town we ourselves dwelt, to whom he might much more properly have sent the man. But when I expostulated with Peter on this point, he replied, that he thought, and had heard, that there were some Enghsh at that time hving at the AVild Man, &c. The case is tliis : because this Peter was unwilhng to lay out his money on this covetous fellow, we have lost our letters. At which, however, I am not so much concerned on my own account, and that of my letters, which I have lost, (for they were mclosed in the same packet,) as for the sake of your letter, my best and dearest master Bullinger, which, as I learn from you, was written to yoii by an old friend. And I wish, as I then told Peter, that I had given him three times the money, if he had but satisfied the letter- carrier, or rather, I should say, the letter-stealer. And to confess to you ingenuously and sincerely, in proportion as I perceive you to be anxious about the letter, this same thing occasions greater uneasiness to myself ; nor do I know what I can do more, or where I can make any farther inquiry on the subject. Although your letter gives me but Httle hope respecting Fren- sham, yet, as he is still ahve, and as long as he contmues so, we must not cease to have some hopes of him. There was an Enghsh youth here of sixteen years old, who was in this present year not only on the borders of death through a similar cough and con- sumption, but even looked like death itself ; and yet, to the astonish- ment of our physicians, he recovered, and is gone with his parents XXII.] J. FOXE TO H. BULLINGER. 47 into England. To Christ the Lord be the praise ! And I wish that our friend Frensham may sometime have to laugh at your physicians in the same way, should it seem good to the Lord Christ, the chief Physician. But may his holy will be done. If you have any thing concerning master Grinaeus, whom you mention in your letter, I pray you to forward it hither, and let me know as soon as possible. I wish to know whether Iloper married a wife^ from among you yonder, or here at Basle. While I am collecting accounts of the other German martyrs, I would not have Zuinghus alone to be passed over. If you have, or if you choose, to communicate any thing respecting him, I will take care, God wiUing, that it shall be printed in England, if it cannot be done so conveniently by the printers in Germany. I am desirous, if the Lord shall spare my life, of visiting and saluting you yonder, most kind and learned Bulhnger, before my return home. Exhort Frensham, I pray you, if he is yet living, not to be so desponding in his mind as to cast away all hope of recovery ; and not to let his mental anxiety seem greater than his bodily disease. Salute, I pray you, master Peter Martyr very much in my name. May the Lord Jesus advance your labours together with your safety, to the advantage of his church I Amen. Basle, June 17, 1559. Yours in Christ, John Foxe. P. S. Give, I pray you, this second letter to Frensham, if he is yet alive. XXIII. J. FOXE TO H. FRENSHAM 2. [A. 15*.] Basle, June 17, 155'J. D. Frenshamo, animi et coi-poris salutem in Christo. Master Frensham. As you in your letters have oft com- forted me, so I would I could likewise comfort you : but where my comfort is small, the Lord Jcsus, the comforter of all, Avork in you sure consolation which may comfort both your body and soul ! In whom I desire you be strong and valiant, so much as the [1 Strype, Mem. ii. i. 399, says that Hoper's wife was an Helvetian woman; but in another place he calls her "a discreet woman of the iow Countries." Mem. ii. i. 170. Other accounts make her a native of Burgundy.] [2 This letter is transcribed from the original English, which was inclosed in the preceding one to Bullinger, and did not probably reach Zui'ich till after the death of the person to whom it was addi-esscd.] 48 J. FOXE TO H. FRENSHAM. [lET. weakness of your disease can bear. Be nothing discouraged, nor be not out of hope in yourself. I have seen here amongst our coun- trymen in the hke disease greater weakness recover full well. I desire you, in your contemplation of Christ, let your spirit be so noble and high in him, that ye may tread under your feet all other things, seem they never so strong, mighty, terrible, or great in this world; for he that hath overcome the world, what hath not he overcome in the world ? Life or death, sickness or health, things present or to come, height or low, are nothing in Christ. Only, my brother, master Frensham, a hearty faith in Jesus Christ is all together whereby alonely we miserable and cor- ruptible wretches are saved, do stand, do triumph, yea, in death and over death, in sin and over sin, and finally have victory over all evils, sin, death, hell, Satan, and all. For so it hath pleased the Father to save us by this faith only in his Son, to the end that we seeing his justice could not otherwise be satisfied but by his Son, we might the more fear him for his great righteousness, and love him for his great mercy, being saved by this faith in his Son. To this all the scripture beareth witness. The Lord Jesus stir up the quickening and feeling of this faith in our dull senses ! To will you this in my prayer as I do not cease, so I do not despair of your recovery altogether : the mighty Lord Jesus, if it be his pleasure, put to his helping hand in restoring your health again I His good will be done. The bottle ye sent is not yet come to me. BasilcEe, June 27, [1559]. Tuus in Christo, John Foxe. XXIV. L. HUMPHREY TO H. BULLINGER. [B. 9.] Basle, June 23, 1559. An opportunity is now afforded me of doing what my duty has long required from me ; which however the sudden arrival and departure of the messenger, and want of time, will not allow me to perform as I ought, and as I could wish. You must therefore, at this time, with your fatherly kindness, take in good part both the shortness of my letter, and my negligence in writing. There came to me from master Abel a packet of letters inclosed in mine, and which I send to your reverence by the bearer, a na- tive of Zurich, a trustworthy man, and one not unknown to you. The other packet that you inquired after, I have not yet been able to meet with, though I have made diligent search after it, and do XXIV.] L. HUMPHREY TO H. BOLLINGER. 49 not yet cease my inquiries, as well for my own sake, as for that of yourself and others. They tell me that the waggoner gave it to some one at the sign of the Wild Man of the Cave '. What became of it afterwards, I know not. Should the letters fall into my hands, of which indeed I have no hope after so long an interval, I will do my best endeavour, that, God willing, they may reach you. And this, excellent sir, is the first motive which now induces me to write. Another is, either the illness or death of my friend Frensham^ : if he is ahve, that by the consolation, exhortation, and aid, which you so well know how to aiford, you may comfort him on his bed of sickness. He has always exceedingly valued your advice, and, if I mistake not, will listen to it even at his latest moments. If he is no longer living, you will cherish his remains with such care as is befitting one who is at rest in the bosom of Abraham, or rather of Christ. Both master Foxe^ and myself are anxious to know what is his state, that is, whether he has departed, or is yet alive; that if living, we may either personally visit him, should there be occasion for it, or attend him with our absent prayers : and if he be not alive, that we may at least honour the funeral of our very dear friend with a pious tear. The third reason for my now wishing to write, namely, that I might thank you for all your kindness towards myself and others, when I was living with my friends at Zurich, I will defer till another opportunity. Meanwhile I commend your piety and holy labours to the Lord, whom I pray to guide by his holy Spirit, and to advance unto all honour, piety, and holiness, both our own church now reviving, and yours which has been long estabUshed. Amen. June 23. Your most devoted, Laurence Humphrey. XXV. E. GRINDAL TO C. HUBERT. [B. 10.] London, July 14, 15o!). Greeting. As I have been formerly accustomed, very dear brother in Christ, to make the most friendly use of your kindness, [1 See above. Letter XXII. p. 46.] [2 Frensham was now dead. His will is still preserved at Zurich, by which it appears that he left a largo portion of his property to charitable purposes, among others, to the poor of Halden, Northam, Woodchurch, Cranbrook, Frittenden and Biddenden. The first words of this document are, " In Dei nomine. Amen. Testamentum meum et voluntatem ad suam gloriam dirigat Deus."] 4 50 E. GRIN DAL TO C. HUBERT. [leT. Avlien I was present with you, so I shall not hesitate, when absent, to entreat your assistance in a matter which I hope will be of no great difficulty to you. For I am in want of some amanuensis to be always at hand in those important occupations and employments to which I am daily called ^ As we labour under the greatest want of good ministers, wc are obhged to employ our own young men, who mio'ht be qualified for this office, in the ministry of the churches. I therefore request your piety, that, if you can meet with any one of your young men who is willing to undertake tliis employment, and to serve me in tliis manner upon suitable terms, (of wliich I leave the arrangement to yourself,) you will take care that he be sent over to me, and make use of the services either of John Abel or William Salkyns in this matter. I should require in the mdivi- dual to be sent, that he should be ready at writing Latin, and that his hand-writing should be tolerably good. He should, more- over, be somewhat acquainted with Greek, and especially with Hebrew, and should take delight in the study of the holy Scrip- tures. All these qualifications are generally to be met with in your young men. And I offer these terms on my part. First, I will bear the expenses of his journey liither, and have written to John Abel respecting the advancement of the money ; and I could wish, if it were possible, that he should come over in his company. In the next place, I will not employ him in any laborious or servile work, but in reading, writing, and similar occupations ; excepting only that he wUl sometimes be required to wait at table, &c. I will give him, moreover, besides his board and two suits of clothes after the English fashion, a fixed salary of twenty Rhenish dollars, or which is the same thing, twenty English crowns, besides what may be added from my liberality, as occasion shall arise. Lastly, if either on account of ill health, or any other reasonable cause, — for example, if England should not agree with him, or if he should be called away by his parents or friends, — I -will also defray the expenses of liis return home. And should he wish to learn our language, which does not very much differ from the German, it will not, I hope, be difficult for me to provide for him in a respectable way. If I do not appear to you to propose terms sufficiently liberal, I am quite ready to allow your prudence to assign more [1 Grindal was employed with others to draw u^p a form of prayer and public worship to be laid before parliament ; and was also one of the eight protcstant divines at the Conference at AVestminster, in March. He was em- ployed too in the summer of this year as a commissioner for the royal visitation in the north. Strype, Grindal, p. 35.] XXV.] E. GRINDAL TO C. HUBERT. $1- liberal ones ; and, the Lord willing, I will perform them, if only you will provide me with a respectable and godly youth, whom I will endeavour so to treat, that he shall not repent of having visited England. I request you to salute master doctor Marpach in my name, without whose aid and assistance I am well aware that this business cannot be accomplished ; but I hope that with his wonted kindness he will lend a favourable ear to my request. For the person, whoever he may be, will not be the less useful to your churches, if he shall return to you with the collected experience of some years' travel. The state of our church (to come to that subject) is pretty much the same as when I last wrote to you, except only that what had heretofore been settled by proclamations and laws with re- spect to the reformation of the churches, is now daily being carried into effect. The popish bishops are almost all of them deprived; and if any yet remain, they will be deprived in a few days for refusing to renounce their obedience to the pope. They are how- ever treated with sufficient lenity, not to say too much so ; for they are allowed to retire into private life, and devour, as master Bucer used to say, the spoils of the church. Many persons think that they begin to repent of their firmness, now they see the French king^, Henry II., in whom their chief hope was placed, taken off not without the manifest declaration of divine vengeance. Many of our friends, who were in exile in Germany, are now marked out for bishops. This is all that I had to write respecting our affairs. I shall be able, I trust, to send you in a few days the account of the burning of Bucer's bones^. I pray you to send me aU the German works of Luther, bound by your bookseller Christopher [Froschover.] Abel or Salkyns will pay the money. This is one reason why I wish for a German amanuensis, because I am un- willing entirely to forget your language. Should you not meet with a suitable person among your friends at home, write, I pray you, to those at Basle, that you may procure me some one even from thence. Write back, I pray you, in three words, what you have been able to do for me. I leave other matters to be more fully explained by John Abel or WilUam Salkyns. I wish you all health m the Lord. London, July 14, 1559. Yours wholly in the Lord, Edmund Grindal, Anglus. [2 Henry II. of France was killed in a tournament, July 10, 1559.] [3 See Ilistoria vera de vita, obitu, sepultura, &c. D. Martini Buceri et Pauli Fagii. Ai-gent. 1562.] 52 p. MARTYR TO T. SAMPSON. [lET. XXVI. P. MARTYR TO T. SAMPSON \ [B. 11.] Zurich, Jitli/ 15, 1559. I SEE you, my friend, altogether in your letter. You are afraid on both sides : for if you reject the ministry, you seem to let go an opportunity of directing things in a proper manner ; while, if you undertake the offered function, you have just and good cause to fear lest you should appear to assent to those ordi- nances, which not only impair and weaken the pure worship of God, but also corrupt and marvellously bring it to decay ; although they may seem to have but little weight and importance in the eyes of men who are but faintly disposed towards the gospel ; for they account all such things as matters of indifference. But will any one who is somewhat better instructed in religion, when he sees you, a messenger of Christ and zealous trumpeter of the gospel, arrayed in these vestments, praying at an altar before the image of the crucifix, repeating holy words, and distributing the sacra- ments, — will any one, I say, not think that these rites are not only tolerated, but also approved by you? Whereby no credit will be given you hereafter, when you teach otherwise. For he whose teaching is at variance with his actions, builds up the things that he destroys, and in like manner destroys the things that he builds up. Neither can the example of the apostle be alleged in excuse for such conduct, who for a time retained the Jewish cere- monies with a safe conscience ; since the Mosaic institutions were brought in of old by the authority and law of God, and neither devised by man's understanding, nor condemned in regard to worship. But the things of which we now speak were both insti- tuted by men without any divine sanction, and have splendidly subserved that worship which all godly persons do now abominate. I would that those who have thought fit that these tilings should be retained, had perceived that, as long as they remain, the gospel is not sufi&ciently established. Truly, if we hated superstitions from the heart, we should endeavour by all means that their very vestiges should be rooted out. I would that we had been somewhat better instructed by the obstinate zeal of our adversaries. They diligently avoid every thing that in any measure savours of our [1 This letter is addressed, in the printed volume of Martyi-'s letters, to a certain friend of his in England; whom Strype considers to have been bishop Grindal. From the internal evidence, however, of this and subse- quent letters addressed to the same person, they appear with greater proba- bility to have been written to Thomas Sampson. See below, Lett. XXXIII.] XXVI .] p. MARTYR TO T. SAMPSON. 53 religion, and of set purpose, as far as they are able, depart from the simple worship of Christ and the most ancient custom of the apostles. Why do not we take care in like manner to depart as far as possible from their pernicious institutions, and aim at apostohc simplicity, not only in doctrine, but also in the administration of the sacraments ? I do not see how the things retained by you can properly be regarded as matters of indiiference. Certainly since they present to the beholders an express resemblance of the pernicious mass, wherein ungodly men will exceedingly delight themselves ; (for they will say that the mass was so holy a thing that the splendid repre- sentation thereof could not displease even us; for though we do not retain it, we nevertheless imitate it in many remarkable ways ;) who thereupon shall prevent such of the bystanders, in whose hearts popery still remains, from adoring the image of the crucifix ? Undoubtedly they will do it, nor can the intention of their mind be prevented. And will the contrivers of these counsels say that this is not done through any fault of theirs, but through the fault of those who are badly taught, and too much addicted to their own superstitions ? They cannot however deny that they give the occasion ; and woe unto those by whom the offence cometh ! Nei- ther can they bring any one proof for their opinion either out of the holy scriptm'es, or the ordinances of the primitive church. But if the desire only of making a new covenant drives them to these things, we must remember that the covenant made of old between us and God is far more excellent than any covenants of man ; and we must diligently take heed, lest, while we follow after civil things, we suffer the loss of heavenly things. Wherefore, my very dear brother in Christ, since things are in this state, I give you two pieces of advice ; first, that you still re- tain the function of preaching, and cease not, both in public and private, to defend the truth of doctrine, and to declaim against rites which are full of offence and occasions of falling. The other is, that you abstain from the administration of the sacraments, until these intolerable blemishes be removed. By these means the opportunity of doing good will not be lost, neither will you confirm others in their superstition by your example. And this is not only my advice, but the same is also the opinion of the reverend and most excellent master Bullinger. As to your former question, I remember that I sent you an answer, but my letter has probably been lost or intercepted. And 1 would have now replied a second time, but that I know not where your letter is, and when I looked 54 p. MARTYR TO T. SAMPSON. [ LET. for it, was not able to find it. If therefore you wish another answer, you will not think much of writing yoiu* questions over again. Salute all our friends. Here master Bullinger, my wife, and Julius with his wife and the rest of our family, salute you. And I especially salute your wife, and Jane. July 15, 1559. Peter Martyr. XXVII. J. JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. [A. 16.] London, Aug. 1, 1559. I HAVE hitherto, my father, written to you less frequently, because many engagements, both of a public and private nature, have prevented my correspondence. I now write, not because I have more leisure than heretofore, but because I shall have much less in future than I have at present. For I have now one foot on the ground, and the other almost on my horse's back. I am on the point of setting out upon a long and troublesome commission^ for the establishment of religion, through Reading, Abingdon, Gloucester, Bristol, Bath, Wells, Exeter, Cornwall, Dorset, and Salisbury. The extent of my journey will be about seven hundred miles, so that I imagine we shall hardly be able to return in less than four months. Wherefore, lest you should in the mean time suppose me dead, notwithstanding I wrote to you twelve days since upon our common affairs, I think it not unmeet to send you this short greeting at the very moment of my setting out. Our affairs are now in a favourable condition. The queen is exceedingly well disposed ; and the people every where thirsting after religion. The bishops, rather than abandon the pope, whom they have so often abjured before, are willing to submit to every thing. Not, how- ever, that they do so for the sake of religion, of which they have none ; but for the sake of consistency, which the miserable knaves now choose to call their conscience. Now that religion is every where changed, the mass-priests absent themselves altogether from pubhc worship, as if it were the greatest impiety to have any thing in common with the people of God. But the fury of these wretches is so great that nothing can exceed it. They are alto- gether full of hopes and anticipations, (for, as you know, they are a most anticipative race, and mightily addicted to futuritions,) [1 This commission was dated July 19, 1559, and addressed to William, Earl of Pembroke, John Jewel, S. Th. P., Hemy Parry, Licentiate in Laws, and Will. LoYelace, lawyer. fStrype, Annals, i. i. 248.] XXVII.] J. JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. "5$ that these things cannot last long. But, whatever may happen in future, we render thanks to Almighty God that our affau^s are as they are. Every thing is in a ferment in Scotland. Knox', surrounded by a thousand followers, is holding assembUes throughout the whole kingdom. The old queen (dowager) has been compelled to shut herself up again in garrison. The nobility with united hearts and hands are restoring rehgion throughout the country, in spite of all opposition. All the monasteries are every where levelled with the ground : the theatrical dresses, the sacrilegious chalices, the idols, the altars, are consigned to the flames ; not a vestige of the ancient superstition and idolatry is left. What do you ask for ? You have often heard of drinking like a Scythian ; but this is churching it like a Scythian. The king of France that now is, styles himself king of Scotland, and in case of any thing happenmg to our queen, (which God forfend !) heir of England. You must not be sm^prised if our people are indignant at this ; and how the matter will at length turn out, God only can determine. A common enemy per- haps, as is sometimes the case, may be the occasion of reconcihng with us our neighbour Scotland ; in which event, although the [queen's] marriage should also take place, — but I will not prognos- ticate. Master Heton salutes you, and that not less affectionately than if you were his father. Some of us are appointed to bishop- ricks ; Cox to Ely, Scory to Hereford, Allen to Eochester, Grindal to London, Barlow to Chichester, and I, the least of the apostles, to Salisbury. But this burden I have positively determined to shake off. In the mean time there is a dismal solitude in our uni- versities. The young men are flying about in all directions, rather than come to an agreement in matters of religion. But my companions are waiting for mo, and calhng to me to set off. Farewell, therefore, my father, and my pride. Salute that reverend man, and on so many accounts dearly-beloved in Christ, master Bullinger, to whom also, if I had time, I would send a separate letter. Salute masters Gualter, Simler, Lavater, Haller, Gesner, Frisius, Herman. I have five golden pistoles from master Bartholomew Compagni, for the venerable old man master Bernardino, with a letter to him from the same. I would write to him concerning the whole business, were I not prevented by want of time. I pray you, however, to let him know, that, except [the payment of] this money, nothing else is settled. Court affairs, [2 Knox arrived in Ediubui'gh from France, May 2, 1559. Strypej Annals, l. i. 176.] 56 J. JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. [lET. as far as I can see, are so difficult of management, that I know not whether any thing can be made of it. The queen is now a long way off in Kent\ so that nothing can be done. Farewell, my father, farewell. May you be as happy as I can wish you ! Salute in my name your Juhus, and Anna, and your little son, [Martyrillus.] London, Aug. 1, 1559. Your every way most attached, John Jewel. XXVIII. J. FOXE TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 17.3 Basle, Aug. 2, 1559. Grace and health through Christ our Lord. Either all my conjectures deceive me, most courteous Henry, or I have at last discovered those letters of ours which were so long lost. In which matter 1 am more indebted to some sort of accident, than to any pains taken about it. The occasion was this : there came into a merchant's house by reason of some letters, I know not what, a certain honest Itahan, the husband of Peter Perne's sister. The master and head manager of that house offered him some letters to read, thinking they were written in Italian. Although this Italian was unacquainted with Enghsh, yet seeing my name on the address, he forthwith came to me with the letters, and told me that the master of the house [above-mentioned] desired I would come to him immediately. I went forthwith, taking with me my friend Laurence, and a certain under-schoolmaster of Basle to act as in- terpreter. The master states that this letter, long since thrown aside, had been lately discovered by a servant boy ; and that there had also been found other letters written both to yourself and master Gesner, which he had already given to Peter Maclaine to forward to you. On opening mine, I find it to be the same as was sent to mo from Abel at the same time and in the same packet with yours ; which circumstance leads me to conjecture that they are the very same letters of ours wliich we were looking for. You will better ascertain this when you have opened them ; and I wish that you would let me know at your leisure. If master Frensham is still living, I pray God that he may long live. Do you bid and exhort him not to despair of himself, [1 July 17th. The queen removed from Greenwich in her progress, and goes to Dartford in Kent. August 5th she was at Eltham. Strype, Annals, I. i. 289. J XXVIII.] J. FOXE TO H. BULLINGER. 57 and much less of the divine favour, which, should it seem expedient, can easily exceed all the powers of medicine, and deceive the ex- pectations of the physicians themselves. Yet I have not heard of any physician who openly and positively despaired of him. And if they did despair, they are better judges perhaps of German [con- stitutions] than of English ones. I desire that you would inform me in time, if you have any information respecting the martyrs, either about BartholomoAv Grinseus, as you seem to intimate in your letter, or about the whole affair and cause of Zuinglius. If the history of Zuinglius cannot be printed here, it can nevertheless be done in England, and no where better. Salute in Christ master Frensham among others, and master Peter Martyr. Be mindful of me in your prayers to the Lord. Basle, Aug. 2, 1559. Yours in Christ, John Foxe. XXIX. T. LEVER TO H. BULLINGER. [B. 13.] London, Atig. 8, 1559. Much health in Christ. As I know that you will receive fuller and better information respecting many of the most important affairs of the state and church of England by the letters of others, I will now write to you, according to my slender ability, about a few things of less consequence. On returning from you towards England, in the course of my journey I saw at Strasburgh a pro- clamation^, that is, an edict published by the authority of queen Elizabeth, strictly prohibiting all preaching and exposition of holy scripture, or any change of religion throughout all England, until the great council, which we call the Parhament, hereafter to be called together, shall have come to a decision respecting rehgion. When then I returned to England, I saw, according to the procla- mation above mentioned, or rather, I shrunk from seeing, masses and all the follies and abominations of popery, every where sanc- tioned by the authority of the laws, and the gospel no where to be met with, except among some persons at London, who were either admitted to preach before the queen at court on a few stated days, only in the time of Lent, or else in a congregation that remained in concealment during the whole time of persecution, and then not venturing forth beyond such private houses as were open to them, P See above. Letter VIII. note 4.] 58 T. LEVER TO H. BULUNGER. [lET. on the cessation of the persecution, they were permitted by queen EHzabeth in open private houses, but in no pubHc churches. For there had been a congregation^ of faithful persons concealed in London during the time of Mary, among whom the gospel was always preached, with the pure administration of the sacraments ; but during the rigour of the persecution under that queen they carefully concealed themselves, and on the cessation of it under EHzabeth they openly continued in the same congregation. But as their godly mode of worship was condemned by the laws of the realm, the magistrates, though they connived at their frequent assembling in private houses, would not allow them, notwithstanding, to occupy the parish churches. In consequence of which, large numbers flocked to them not in the churches, but in private houses. And when the Lord's supper was administered among them, no strangers were admitted, except such as had been kept pure from popery and even from the imputation of any evil conduct ; or who, ingenuously acknowledging their backsliding and public offence, humbly sought pardon and reconciliation in presence of the whole assembly. I have frequently been present on such occasions, and have seen many returning with tears, and many too in hke manner with tears receiving such persons into communion ; so that nothing could be more delightful than the mutual tears of all parties, on the one side lamenting their sins, and on the other congratu- lating them on their reconcihation and renewed communion in Christ Jesus. Some of us preachers, who had returned to England from Germany, being much affected with these things, and considering that the silence imposed for a long and uncertain period was not agreeable to the command and earnest injunction of Paul, to preach the word of God in season and out of season, having been requested to do so, forthwith preached the gospel in certain parish churches, to which a numerous audience eagerly flocked together. And when we solemnly treated of conversion to Christ by true repentance, many tears from many persons bore witness that the preaching of the gospel is more effectual to true repentance and wholesome reformation, than any thing that the whole world can either imagine or approve. For while these things were taking place among private individuals, without the sanction of any public authority, behold, at the very same time masses were being celebrated with all the idolatrous superstition of popery among persons distinguished for [} See above. Letter VIII. note 5. See also Foxe's Acts and Mon. for some interesting details relative to this congregation.] XXIX.] T. LEVER TO H. BULLINGER. ^9 their influence, their wealth, and their pubUc offices, ai:id this with the whole authority of law, proclamation, and practice. And now popery is at length abolished by authority of parliament, and the true rehg-ion of Clu^ist restored : this unclean world, both in the one and the other, seeks after nothing but base lucre and filthy pleasure. Very many persons are so drawn over from that to this, that they are neither willing to purify the dross of the one, nor embrace the purity of the other, but are disposed to frame themselves after the fashion of this world. For there are many who love, possess, and ostentatiously glory in the monuments of superstition, the emolu- ments of lucre, the liberty, yea, even the pleasures of the flesh, to the great scandal and disgrace of the rehgion they profess. But God will at length give the victory to the little ones of the weak flock of Christ, against the powerful tyrants of the world. For all the sanguinary bishops here are deposed; learned, pious, and dis- creet persons are sent forth to visit all parts of England". Zealous preachers of the gospel, who used to preach at first contrary to the queen's proclamation, have now, by means of letters sealed with the queen's seal, free license to preach throughout all England. And I, who have long been preaching the gospel among the most ignorant persons in the remoter districts, have determined, God willing, to return to-morrow from London to them and others like them, who have seldom or never heard any exposition of the gospel of Christ. For such persons seem to me most of all in want of, and most ready to receive, the edification and consolation afforded to them in Christ's gospel. But I must not write any more of myself, except only that I wish now to promise you by letter, what I will at all times faith- fully perform according to the opportunity and ability which God shall give me ; namely, that I will use every endeavour that you and your countrymen, who so kindly provided for us English, when in exile for the sake of rehgion, mav be assured that we are not unmindful of so great kindness, and that we shall ever continue grateful for it. Commend us to the prayers of all the godly. Salute for me your wife, my excellent hostess, with your children, and all your household, to whom I wish abundant blessings from God in Christ. Salute the ministers of your church, and especially its chief pillars, masters Bernardino, Martyr, and Gualter. May the Lord Jesus long preserve you to the edification of his universal Church in Christ ! Amen. London, Aug. 8, 1559. Your ever faithfully attached in Christ, Thomas Lever. [2 For an account of this visitation, see Strype, Annals, i. i. 245, &c.] 60 J. JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. [lET. XXX. J. JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. [A. 19] London, Nov. 2, 1559. I HAVE at last returned to London, with a body worn out by a most fatiguing journey. You probably supposed me dead, be- cause I did not write : meanwhile, I was kept away three whole months by tliis very tedious and troublesome commission. While I was at Bristol, there was delivered to me that letter from you which our friend Randolph ' had brought with him ; written in so friendly and agreeable a manner, as altogether to remove from my mind the wearisomeness both of the journey and of my employ- ments. For I could then fancy myself to be conversing with you just as if you had been present. Randolph had gone away into France before my return : so that poor I was deprived of a great part of those delightful communications which you had personally charged them with. My letter, I perceive, was lost on the road ; for that which I had sent you as the eighth, was, I find, only the Jifth that had reached you. But what, you will say, has been done after all by this com- mission of yours ? Receive then in one word, what it took me a long time to investigate. We found every where the people suffi- ciently well disposed towards religion, and even in those quarters where we expected most difficulty. It is however hardly credible Avhat a harvest, or rather what a wilderness of superstition had sprung up in the darkness of the Marian times. We found in all places votive relics of saints, nails with which the infatuated people dreamed that Christ had been pierced, and I know not what small fragments of the sacred cross. The number of witches and sor- ceresses- had every where become enormous. The cathedral churches were nothing else but dens of thieves, or worse, if any thing worse or more foul can be mentioned. If inveterate obstinacy was found any where, it was altogether among the priests, those especially who had once been on our side. They are now throwing all things into confusion, in order, I suppose, that they may not seem to have changed their opinions without due consideration. [1 It would seem from the extract from the state papers given in Lett. XXXV. (No. 7), that Randolph, who was entrusted with the safe conveyance of the earl of AiTan from France into Scotland, visited Peter Martyr at Zurich during this journey, from whom he brought the letter hero referred to.] [2 A Bill against witchcraft and enchantments was brought into the house of Lords from the lower house April 27, 1659, and was passed in the following session. Strype, Annals, i. i. 88.] XXX.] J. JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. 61 But let them make what disturbance they please ; we have m the mean time disturbed them from their rank and office. That consistent man, Harding^, has preferred to change his condition rather than his opinions. Sidall* has subscribed too, and with equal consistency, that is, sorely against his will. But your friend Smithy what has he done ? you will ask. Can any good thing come out of Nazareth ? Believe me, that he might re- tain his old consistency, he has now at last recanted for the fifth time ! The silly man, when he saw rehgion change, changed his habit, and forthwith prepared to take refuge in Scotland ; but while he was loitering on the borders, he was apprehended, and brought back from his travels. And now tliis grave personage, this prop and support of religion, has come over to us, deserted all his party, and become all of a sudden the most inveterate enemy of the papists. Go now and deny transubstantiation, if you can. The ranks of the papists have fallen almost of their own accord. Oh ! if we were not wanting in our exertions, there might yet bo good hopes of religion. But it is no easy matter to drag the chariot without horses, especially up hill. Yesterday, as soon as I returned to London, I heard from the Archbishop of Canterbury that you are invited hither, and that your old lectureship is kept open for you. I know not how true this may be; I can only affirm thus much, that no Professor of Divinity is yet appointed at Oxford. For my own part, my father, I most exceedingly long to see you, and especially in England ; and how can I do otherwise than desire this, who am so perpetually desiring to see you even at Zurich ? But I know your prudence ; and you know the character and disposition of us islanders. I pray that what we now see the beginning of may be lasting. Nothing can be in a more desperate condition than the [Divinity] school is at present. You will think, that when you were formerly there, you had employed all your exertions to no purpose. " Thus in the garden that was once so gay. The darnel and the barren weed bear sway<5." Your book on Vows~, hke all your other works, is caught up [3 T. Harding, of New College, Oxford ; who under king Edward VI. had been a very zealous protestant, but under queen Mary came about, and' was as hot the other way, being preferred under her to a prebend of Win- chester, and the treasui-ership of Sarum. Strype, Annals, i. ii. 175.] [} See above, p. 29, note 2.] p See above, p. 24, note 2.] [s Infelix lolium ct steriles dominantur avense. — Virg.] {^ A refutation of Richard Smith's two books, concerning single life and monkish vows.] 62 J. JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. [lET. with the greatest avidity. We are all now looking for you to pubhsh your further commentaries on the book of Judges, and on the two books of Samuel ; for all our friends are now aware that you have those books in hand, and are intending to publish them. The Swede ^, and Charles^ the son of [the emperor] Ferdinand, are courting at a most marvellous rate. But the Swede is most in earnest, for he promises momitains^ of silver in case of success. The lady however is probably thinking of an alhance nearer home. My friend Allen ^ has departed this life, after having been nominated bishop of Rochester. We hear at tliis time nothing from Scotland that can be new to you. The gospel is taught ; churches are dili- gently brought together, and all the monuments of the old super- stition demolished. The French however are stiU hoping to retain both the kingdom and their rehgion. Whatever may happen, I will write to you fully at another time. That sixtieth year is now approaching, concerning which you were sometimes wont to relate some wonderful predictions of a certain Italian, named Torquatus^. God grant us the enjoyment of real and substantial joy, that the man of perdition may at length be made manifest to the whole world, and the truth of the gospel of Jesus Christ be universally exhibited ! Farewell, my father, and salute your wife^ in my name, a lady indeed personally unknown to me, but with whom I am nevertheless now well acquainted, both by your letter, and our friend Abel's commendation of her. I congratulate you on her account, and her on yours. Salute masters Bullinger, Gualter, Bernardino, Herman, Julius, his wife, and my httle Martyr. A long farewell to my friend Frensham, who I imagine has now departed from you to be [1 The prince of Sweden, whose title was duke of Finland, landed at Harwich on Sept. 27, 1559, and reached London Oct. 5. His object was to make suit to the queen on behalf of the king [Eric XIV.] his brother. Strype, Annals, i. i. 291. 368.] [2 Archduke of Austria, and brother of the emperor Maximilian.] [3 Aug. 30, 1561, the news was that the king of Sweden was sending a great number of waggons laden with massy bullion, and other things of value to England. He continued his courtshij) most eagerly till 1562. Strype, Annals, i. i. 405.] [* Edmund Allen, an exile for religion in the reign of queen Mai*y. He was buried on the 30th of August. Strype, Annals, i. i. 199.] [5 Torquatus was a physician and astrologer at Ferrara, in the 15th century. He wrote a "prognostic" of the ruin of Europe, dedicated to Matthias king of Hungary, in which he foretold events from 1480 to 1540.] [6 Catherine Merenda, Peter Martyr's second wife, was recommended to him from the Italian chm'ch at Geneva, where she lived an exile for religion.] XXX.] J. JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. 63 with Christ, All our friends salute you, and msh you every happiness. London, JS^ovember 2, 1559. Yours most heartily, John Jev/el. Master Heton urgently entreated me to salute you in liis name. Could he write Latin himself, he would not make use of my pen : believe me, there is no one who speaks of you more frequently, or with greater commendation. His wife also sends her respects both to you and yours. XXXI. J. JEWEL TO K. GUALTER. [A. 20.] London, A^'ov. 2, 1559. Much health. That you so kindly congratulate, not myself so much on this accession of care and anxiety, as our church, respect- ing which you tell me that you no longer despair, I return you mv thanks, most accomplished sir, not indeed on my own account, upon whom I feel such a heavy burden is imposed, but in the name of our church, concerning which I perceive your thoughts are so anxiously occupied. For, as it regards myself, you well know what an undertaking it is, especially for a man unskilled in business, and always brought up in inactivity and obscurity, to be raised at once to the government of the church ; and though scarcely able to manage his own affairs, to take upon himself the management of those of others. Smcc however it is the cause of God, I will en- deavour to make up by diligence what is wanting in ability ; for though I am deficient in other respects, I shall not, I hope, be wanting in inclination. Do you meanwhile, since you have safely landed your vessels, and brought them ashore, pray to God that we may at length bring our vessel, hitherto tossed by the Avaves, and attacked on all sides by pirates and robbers, into harbour. For the rage of the papists among us at this time is scarcely credible ; and rather than seem to have been in error in any re- spect, they most impotently precipitate and throw all things into confusion. May that God whose honour and glory alone we look to, aid our endeavours, and confound the conspiracies and wicked designs of his enemies ! Parkhurst is gone to his people at Cleeve", where he now reigns like a king, and looks down upon all bishops. Whatever news I had to communicate, which, indeed, was neither certain nor of much importance, I have written at some Icno-th, [" He was at this time rector of Bishop's Clecve near Cheltenham.] 64 J. JEWEL TO R. GU ALTER. [lET. both to masters Bullinger and Martyr. If there is any tiling in which I can contribute either to your advantage or enjoyment, bear in mind, that in whatever situation I may be, I am, and always shall be at your service. Fare thee well, most excellent and accomplished sir. Salute in my name the honoured lady your wife, as also masters Bullinger, Simler, Lavater, Zuinglius, Frisius, Gesner, Wolfius, and your other friends whom I so justly value. Though Parkhurst is a long way off, yet I salute you, your wife, and all your family, in his name. All our friends salute you and all yours. Again farewell. London, Nov. 2, 1559. Yours from my heart, John Jewel. XXXII. J. JEWEL TO J. SIMLER. [A. 22.] London, Nov. 2, 1559. You congratulate me, my dear Josiah, with your accustomed kindness, but I cannot congratulate myself. For though as yet nothing more has been imposed upon me than the name of bishop, (for upon the office^ itself and its duties I have not yet entered,) I feel nevertheless that even this burden is far beyond my strength, and that I am already beginning to bend under an empty title. What, think you, will be the case, when I come to undertake the charge itself? Your letter, however, arrived most acceptably; for I discovered therein your affectionate regard and love to me. And what indeed that is otherwise than agreeable can proceed from Josiah, who is himself most agreeable ? Wherefore, although the subject of it seems exceedingly unpleasant and annoying to me, I return you my most grateful thanks both for your letter and your congratu- lations. As to your expressing your hopes that our bishops will be con- secrated without any superstitious and offensive ceremonies, you mean, I suppose, without oil, without the chrism, without the ton- sure. And you are not mistaken ; for the sink would indeed have been emptied to no purpose, if we had suffered those dregs to settle at the bottom. Those oily, shaven, portly hypocrites, we have sent back to Home from whence we first imported them : for we require our bishops to be pastors, labourers, and watchmen. And [1 He was consecrated bishop of Salisbury, Jan. 21, 1560.] XXXII.] J. JEWEL TO J. SIMLER. 65 that this may the more readily be brought to pass, the wealth of the bishops is now diminished and reduced to a reasonable amount, to the end that, being relieved from that royal pomp and courtly bustle, they may with greater ease and diligence employ their leisure in attending to the flock of Christ. In that you are so earnest in your recommendation of our mutual friend JuHus, although you are Josiah, yet I must think that in this matter you do me injustice. For why ? am I not sufiiciently acquainted with my good Julius, my host, my friend, my brother? Can his baldness, remarkable as it is, ever slip from my remembrance ? No, never. As often as I behold any bald, stooping, crooked old man, clumsy and uneasy in his movements, my friend Juhus is sure to come into my mind. Be assured, that under whatever circumstances, whether he may need advice, or assistance, or money, — or even a halter, Julius shall be always Julius as far as Jewel is concerned. But, joking apart, whenever my friend Juhus shall come to me, if Jewel has ought to spare, he shall not want. Fare thee well, my Josiah, and salute in my name that most excellent lady your wife, and that most talented and accomphshed young man Herman. Parkhurst is gone into the country, to his kingdom^. He desired me, however, before he went, to salute you most dutifully in his name. Farewell, my Josiah, farewell : I wish I may some day be able face to face to say, Josiah, how do you do ? London, Nov. 2, 1559. Yours from my heart, John Jewel. XXXIII. P. MARTYR TO T. SAMPSON ». [B. 14.] Zurich, November 4, 1559. The letter that you sent me on the 27th of August, I received towards the end of October : wherefore if I am somewhat late in my reply, it is no fault of mine ; especially since trustworthy couriers to Strasburgh are not often to be met with. But with respect to the subject of your present inquiry, I know that I have written at length in another letter ; so that either my letter must have miscarried, or you had not received it when you last wrote. But that you may not be disappointed of my advice and assistance, [2 Bishop's Cleeve, of which he was rector. See p. G3.] [3 There is no address to this letter, but it is acknowledged by Sampson in Letter XXXIX. below.] 5 66 p. MARTYR TO T. SAMPSON. [lET- I Avill repeat what I have before wiitten. There seems no reason Tvhy you should trouble yourself about impropriations ; for you have nothing to do with the question, whence or how the queen may choose to afford a mamtenance or stipend either to the bishop or the parochial clergy. But should they seem to be destitute of suitable provision, you may petition and intercede on their behalf; or if you have more than enough yourselves, impart to them some- what of your own comfortable means of subsistence. With respect also to wearing the round cap or habit at other times besides that of divine service, I think you ought not to contend more than is necessary ; for superstition does not properly seem to have any thing to do therein. But in regard to the use of garments as holy in the ministry itself, seeing they have a resemblance to the mass, and are mere relics of popery, master Bullinger is of opinion that you should not use them, lest a thing that occasions offence may be sanctioned by your example. But though I have always been opposed to the use of ornaments of this kind, yet as I perceived the present danger of your being deprived of the office of preacliing, and that there will perhaps be some hope that, like as altars and images have been removed, so this resemblance of the mass may also be taken away, provided you and others who may obtain bishopricks, will direct all your endeavours to that object, (wliich would make less progress, should another succeed in your place, who not only might be indifferent about putting away those rehcs, but would rather defend, cherish, and maintain them ;) therefore was I the slower in advising you rather to refuse a bishoprick, than to consent to the use of those garments. However, as I saw that offences of that kind must be altogether avoided, I easily fell into his opinion. But where altars and images are retained, I myself of my own accord maintain, as I have also wi'itten to you in another letter, that you must by no means officiate. This is all that I can write upon the present subject. And you must take care on your part not to do any thing against your con- science. But I am afraid lest my letter should arrive too late, which fault however is none of mine, for I have not omitted any opportunity of writing. Lastly, I wish you to understand that questions of this kind are also full of difficulty to us here, and therefore advice cannot be so easily given. As to myself, when I was at Oxford, I would never wear the surplice in the choir, although I was a canon, and I had my own reasons for doing so. Wherefore I recommend you also to take advice upon the spot. I know that my example ought not to be considered sufficient to XXXIII.] p. MARTYR TO T. SAMPSON. 67 determine you ; but that which then influenced me, influences me still, and perhaps also may influence you, namely, to do nothing which might give any sanction to what my conscience disapproves. You bade me write briefly, and I have briefly written. Take it in good part, pray for me, salute our friends. Master BuUinger salutes you, as doth also my wife, and Julius mth. his wife. Fare you well, my most loving brother and esteemed master in Christ. Zurich, Nov. 4, 1559. Peter Martyr. XXXIV. J. JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. [A. 23.] London, Nov. 5, 1559. Two days after my return from a long and tiresome journey, when, wearied and exhausted with travelling, I had written to you I know not what, three letters from you reached me at the same moment ; by the most dehghtful perusal of which I was so refreshed, as entirely to banish from my mind all the troubles of the preceding days. For though, whenever I tliink about you (as I certainly do every hour of my life, and should be very ungrateful if I did not,) I am delighted at the very thought and remembrance of your name ; yet when I read your letters, I seem to myself to be at Zurich, and in your society, and in most dehghtful conversation with you, which indeed, beheve me, I value more than all the wealth of the bishops. As to what you write respecting rehgion, and the theatrical habits, I heartily wish it could be accomplished. We on our parts have not been wanting to so good a cause. But those persons who have taken such delight in these matters, have followed, I beheve, the ignorance of the priests ; whom, when they found them to be no better than mere logs of wood, without talent, or learning, or morality, they were willing at least to commend to the people by that comical dress. For in these times, alas ! no care whatever is taken for the encouragement of hterature and the due succession of learned men. And accordingly, smcc they cannot obtain influence in a proper way, they seek to occupy the eyes of the multitude with these ridiculous trifles. These are, indeed, as you very properly observe, the relics of the Amoritcs. For who can deny it ? And I wish that sometime or other they may be taken away, and extir- pated even to the lowest roots : neither my voice nor my exertions shall be wanting to effect that object. 5—2 ■68 J. JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. [lET, As to your writing that there are some persons^ who as yet have given no expression of their good will to you, I rather suspect to whom you allude. But beheve me, they are neither in the rank or position you suppose them to be, and in which all [our] Israel hoped they would be. For if they had been — They have hitherto refrained from writing to you, not from any disinclination or forgetfuhiess of you, but because they were really ashamed to write. Both of them are now suffering most severely under an attack of ague ; but 'Ap-)(^ifxdye.ipo^ [Sir Antony Cook], as being of a more melancholy temperament, is much the worse. With yom' usual affection to the common cause, you were grieved at hearing that no provision had been made for any one of us. You may now resume your grief, for nothing whatever has been done up to the present moment. We only bear about the empty titles of bishops, and have deserted the ranks of [Duns] Scotus and Thomas [Aquinas] for those of the Occamists and Nominalists. But as you know, state affairs move slowly. The queen herself both favours our cause, and is desirous to serve us. Wherefore, although these beginnings are painful enough, we do not lose om' spirits, nor cease to hope for better tilings. That which easily comes to maturity, easily decays. I wrote to you, as I remember, at some length, respecting your book, before I left London ; but my letter, as is often the case, was probably lost on the road : I added also, that the queen of her own accord eagerly perused both your letter and the book itself, and wonderfully commended both your learning and character in general ; and that your book was made so much of by all men, that I know not whether any thing of the kind was ever so valued before. But alas ! what must I say, when no recompence has been as yet made to you? I am ashamed, and know not what to answer. The queen hoAvever made dihgent inquiry of the messenger, as to what you were doing, where you lived, in what state of health and what circumstances you were, and whether your age would allow you to undertake a journey. She was altogether desir- ous that you should by all means be invited to England, that as you formerly tilled, as it were, the university by your lectures, so you might again luater it by the same, now it is in so disordered and wretched a condition. But since then, the deliberations about Saxony and the embassy from Smalcald have put an end to those comisels. Yet, whatever be the reason, nothing is at tliis time more talked about, than that Peter Martyr is invited, and daily [1 Sh- Thomas Wroth, and Sir Antony Cook. See the next letter, p. 73.] XXXIV.] J. JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. 69^ expected to arrive in England. Oh ! how I wish that our affairs may sometime acquire stabiUty and strength ! For I am most anxious, my father, to see you, and to enjoy your most dehghtful conversation and most friendly counsels. If I should ever see that day, or rather, as I hope I may say, when I shall see it, where is the Amiens or Salisbury that I shall not look down upon ? Fare- well, my pride, and more than the half of my own soul. Salute in my name that excellent lady your wife : may God grant her a happy delivery^, and make you the father of a beautiful offspring ! Salute masters Bullinger, Gualter, Lavater, Simler, Gesner, Frisius, JuUus, his wife, and my little Martyr, likewise Herman, your friend and mine. M\. our friends salute you. London, Nov. 5, 1559. Yours most heartily, John Jewel. XXXV. J. JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. [A. 24.] London, Nov. 16, 1559. Much health. Although I wrote to you not many days since, and there is nothing going on here at this time which you would much desire to know, yet since I doubt not but that you wish it, I had rather write that nothing, than dismiss the coiu-ier, who, as I have just learned accidentally, is about to proceed to Cologne, without a letter from me. Rehgion among us is in the same state which I have often described to you before. The doctrine is every where most pure ; but as to ceremonies and maskings, there is a httle too much foolery. That little silver cross, of ill-omened origin, stUl maintains its place in the queen's chapel. Wretched me! tliis thmg will soon be drawn into a precedent. There was at one time some hope of its being removed ; and we all of us dihgently exerted ourselves, and still continue to do, that it might be so. But as far as I can per- ceive, it is now a hopeless case. Such is the obstinacy of some minds. There seems to be far too much prudence, too much mystery, in the management of these affairs ; and God alone knows what will be the issue. The slow-paced horses retard the chariot. Cecil favours our cause most ardently. The bishops are as yet only marked out [for promotion], and their estates are in the mean time gloriously swelling the exchequer. Both our universities, and [2 Peter Martyr had two children by this wife, who both died very young, and before him; and he left her with child of a third, which proved a daughter.] 70 J. JEWEL TO P. MARTYK, [lET. that especially which you heretofore cultivated with so much learn- ing and success, are now lying in a most wretched state of disorder, without piety, without rchgion, without a teacher, without any hope of revival. Many of our leading men, and those not miknown to you, are fixing their thoughts upon yourself, and are anxious that you should be invited at the carhcst opportunity, in spite of all the German leaguers. But I, who most of all mankind, anxiously and above all things desire to see you, cannot but recommend you, if you should be invited, (which however I scarcely think will be the case in the existing state of affairs,) to do nothing in a hurry. I know your prudence, and you also, I hope, on your part, are aware of my regard for you. I can indeed with truth affirm thus much, that there is no man to whom your presence would be more agreeable than to myself. But yet, as our afi'airs are so fluctuating, uncertain, unstable, and in one word, insular, I had rather hear of you absent and in safety, than see you present among us and in danger. But all this is very little to the purpose ; for it is but just that learning should be silent amid the din of arms. We are aiding our neighbours, the Scots, both by land and sea. For you know [the old saymg], "'Tis like to prove your own concern, When neighbouring walls begin to burni." They say that the French king is coming with all his army; and he will probably be met by no inferior numbers. Pamphilus^, the companion of your friend Crito, has lately 1 " Turn tua res agitur, paries cum proximus ardet." [2 The fictitious names of Pamphilus and Crito occur not unfrequently in Jewel's correspondence with Peter Martyr. The following extracts from the state papers of the time are presented to the reader, with the view of aiding him in the detection of the persons intended by them. 1. In a letter fi-om Sir Nicolas Throgmorton to secretary Cecil, dated Paris, June 21, 1559, is the following passage ; " I praye you Sr. in case Thomas Rmidal be not dispatched before the receipt hereof, to wome him, that after his arrivall in France he take upon him to be a merchant, and that his passage may be as secretly as may he." Forbes's Full View of the public transactions in the reign of queen Elizabeth. "Vol. i. p. 136. 2. Another letter from the same to the same, dated June 28, 1559, states, " The French king hath lately sent scrtayne commyssyoners to ap- prehend th' crle of Arrayw, Avith grete severite and extremity, to bringe hym either (juicko or deade. Whereupon the sayd crle of Arrayne, to save hys lyfe, is iled, no won can tell whyther." Forbes, p. 147. 3. The queen thus writes to Sir N. Tlu'ogmorton, July 17, 1559. XXXV.] J, JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. 71 written to me from Scotland, as well about other matters, as that I should write to you something, I hardly know what, (for he did " Touching the erle of Arrayne, as theis bearers can declare unto you, we be desyi-oose that he sholcl be helped from. Geneva into this realme, or into Scotland; and for that purpoose, oui* meaning shall better appeare in a memoryall, ciphred by the new last ciphre, sent from you whereunto we remitt you." Forbes, p. 162. 4. Extract from the above mentioned memorial. " The sauff conveying of the earl of Arrayne, hither mito this realme, or Scotland, semeth here a thing both proffitable, and nedeful. The doing of it cannot be here pre- sci'ibed, but is referred to your discretion ; wherein ye shall observe great commendation. It must be done secretly, as weU in respect of th' emperor's subjects and friends, and the king Catholique's as of the French's Ye must nodes take the chardge to appoint one for the expedition of the earl of Ajrrayn, from Geneva." 6. The queen again writes to Sir N. Throgmorton, July 19, 1559. " Common charite, the honor of the partye, and our own experience of such lyke calamities, moveth us to have compassion ; and therefore we wold, that ye shuld employe your wisedome, how he might be safely counselled to preserve hymselfe from the danger of the Frenche king and the Guises. Wlierein although there maye many other wayes be devised ; yet we see not presently, if he shall be forced to depart thence, (which we wold not without evident necessite,) than ether, persona dissimidata, to goo to Geneva, and there to remayne, untill tyme shall reveale hym fui'der coimsell ; or els to come into our ile of Jersaye, and so to come to Plimmonth or Hampton, and so to passe to his father unto Scotland." Forbes, p. 166. 6. It appears from a memorial dated July 21, 1559, that Henry Killi- grew was sent to Su' N. Throgmorton, to " devise the most secret and spedy wayes to convey the erle of Ai-rayne from Geneva." His dkections were " to provide that the said erle comme not into the possessions of th' em- peror, the kings of Spaync, the bishops papists, nor others confederate with the French, that he in no wise appeare who ho is, in all his journaye, not to his most assured, but ether as a merchant, or scalier." Forbes, p. 171. 7. Killigrew arrived at Paris July 22, and on the 27th, Sir N. Throg- morton writes to the queen, " Of the earle of Arrayne I have not learned any thing certainly, since the dispatching of Mr Randall from hence to Chastelereu, in the company of th' erle of An-ayne's master of the horse ; and whether th' erle of Arrayne be at Geneva, or Tigure, where order was by me taken for his arryvall, I do not yet know." Forbes, p. 172. If he visited Tigure, (Zurich), as seems probable from the above extract, it will account for Jewel's mentioning him as the friend and guest of Pet. Mai-tyr, in letter xLiii. It appears that Randolph met the earl of Arran at Geneva, and accompanied him from thence. 8. Sir N. Throgmorton writes to Sec. Cecil, July 29. "I suppose youe shall hear of the earl of Ai'rayno there in England before I can now here of hym ; for he departed the G of July from Losanna in Suyscr-land in post, and sent me word he wold embark, where ho cold most commo- diously find passage." Forbes, p. 183. 72 J. JEWEL TO P. MARTYK. [lET. not clearly express himself,) respecting our friend Frensham. He seemed, however, to wish me to make some inquiry respecting Frensham's will. What has been done about it, I do not know ; but I entreat you, since there is no one else in those parts, upon whom 1 can take the liberty of imposing so much trouble, to undertake the management of this business, together with your friend Julius. If Frensham is still ahve, I wish him well : if he is, as I suppose, and am informed by letter, no longer hving, I hope it is well. I hear that a packet of your book upon vows, against Smith, has arrived in London, and that there is among them a copy sent by you expressly to myself. I have not yet seen it, for I am often absent from London, and am much taken up by my engagements in different parts of the country ; but wherever it may be, I will scent it out. Meanwhile, however, I offer you, as I ought to do, and as your kindness demands, my lasting thanks. I would not that master Bernardino^ should suppose that I have forgotten him. My influence and exertions have not been wanting ; but every thing is now sought after, and retained for the support of the army. The five Itahan crowns, which I received from master Barthol. Compagni in his name, 1 handed over to Acontius. We are now exerting ourselves about his canonry ; and there is a good prospect of obtaining it. If my friend Julius should come to us, I promise him every kindness : I advise him, however, to wait a little while, lest we 9. By a letter of Cecil to Sir R. Sadler and Sir James Croft, of Sept. 11, 1559, it appears that the earl of Arran travelled under the feigned name of Monsr. de Beaufort. He says, " I wold be gladd to here of the sure entry of Monsr. de Beaufort, ye knowe what erle I mean." Sir R. Sadler's state papers. Vol. i. p. 437. 10. A letter from Sir R. Sadler to Cecil, dated Berwick, Sept. 16, 1559, states, without mentioning the earl's name, that " he was safely delivered in Teeydale to one of his friends hands, that undertoke to convey him surelie and secretlye to his father ; so you shall understande that we have now certein advertisement, that ho is safely in the castell of Hamilton with his father ; and hitherto he remaineth there, so secret, that at the writing thereof it was not known in Scotland, that he is arrived tliere. Ho hath sent hither for Randall whom we woll send unto him by the same man that conveyed him. before, with as moch spede as we may covenyently." Sadler, p. 447. It will readily be concluded from a comparison of these extracts, that the Pamphilus and Crito in Jewel's correspondence, are the Randolph and earl of Arran above mentioned.] [1 Bernardino Ochinus accompanied Peter Martyr into England in 1549, and was received into the ftimily of archbishop Cranmer. Strype, Memo- rials, II. i. 309. Cranmer, 279.] XXXV.] J. JEWEL TO P. MART-^R. 73 should be obliged to return together to Zurich. Farewell, my father and much esteemed master in Christ. Salute the excellent lady your wife, and give a kiss for me to your little son Isaac, whom I can fancy that I hear bawhng even here. Salute masters BuUinger, Bernardino, Gualter, Simler, Gesner, Lavater, Wickius, Haller, Wolfius, (that most agreeable man, and native of a most honourable city), Frisius, Herman, our friend JuKus, his wife, and that most good tempered boy Martyrillus. Almost all our friends are dispersed among the Gentiles. Bishops Grindal of London, Sandys of Worcester, Cox of Ely, together with [Sir Antony] Cook, and [Sir Thomas] Wroth, who are still suffering with ague, salute you. Again and again, my father, farewell. London, Nov. 16, 1559. Wholly yours, John Jewel. XXXVI. J. JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. [A. 2.5.] London, Dec. 1, 1559. There was brought me yesterday from Scotland a letter from Pamphilus", the presiding angel and companion of our friend Crito, respecting the whole state of affairs in that kingdom from the very beginning of the disturbances ; all which he entreated me to com- municate to you with diligence, and in the order of events. He would rather have written to you himself, if either the circum- stances of time or place had allowed him to do so. As for me, since I know that you especially delight in brevity, I will write briefly. The Scotch [congregation] at the beginning published certain declarations; first, that they only regarded the public weal, and that none of them sought any individual advantage to himself; next, that it appeared to be for the general interest, that the queen should desist from fortifying Leith, a maritime town and most con- venient for the French, should there be any occasion for their ser- vices. Should she refuse to accede to this, they would then act as became men zealous for liberty, and lovers of their country. The queen however, being a haughty woman, and of French blood, rejected these terms, exclaiming that it was an indignity to her to be dictated to by her subjects. Nor were there wanting a great many Scots, who were still obedient to her authority. The result, [2 See note 2, p. 70.] 74 J. JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. [lET. however, was that they came to an engagement ; when the bishop of St Andrews, a soldier, and worthy, forsooth, to be the slave of a weak woman, was deserted by all his own people before the battle. Only two httle boys remained with him, I suppose that he might not have to return to his mistress alone and unattended. The Scots have in their camp the preachers Knox and Good- man, and they call themselves the " congregation of Christ." Their next step was to send to the queen to retire from Leith, if she would not be driven from thence by force and violence. And from this time they began to treat about an alhance with England. The queen, a woman with a man's courage, though she was every day deserted by some of her own party, was nevertheless nowise dismayed ; she kept possession of the garrison, made saUies against the enemy, planned every thing, surveyed every thing with her own eyes. The Scots are a powerful and numerous people ; and had they not been unskilled in sieges and the art of war, they would have effected something long before this time. Slight skirmishes took place on both sides up to the sixth of November, after which the Scots retired into winter quarters ; whereupon a rumour was spread abroad by the queen''s party, that the Scots had run away with their spirits broken. But they, with their leaders, still maintain their ground, and hold councils, and increase their numbers, and levy money, and have troops in readiness, should there be any occasion for their services. I have but briefly touched upon these matters : I will write more at length hereafter, when I shall be better informed respect- ing them ; for great news is expected. We are raising troops, and seriously thinking about war. Farewell, my father. Salute your wife, masters Bullinger, Bcrnardlne, Herman, Juhus and his wife. — London, the first of December, on wliich day I first heard of the death of (queen) Mary. Yours, John Jewel. XXXVII. J. PARKHURST TO J. SIMLER. [A. 26.] Bishop's Cleeve, Dec. 20, 1559. I CANNOT express to you, my very kind Josiah, the pleasure it gave me to learn from your letter that you are in good health ; which indeed our friend Gualter had before informed me of, but not having paid sufficient attention to his letter, I imagined you were dead. So great was my stupidity, or rather, so great my XXXVII.] J. PARKHURST TO J. SIMLER. 75 love, that on very slight grounds I suspected what was by no means the case, and which indeed grieved me most exceedingly. Mes est solliciti plena timoris amor. I was restored to my [rectory at] Cleeve on the second of September, that is, after harvest, when every thing had been taken away, and nothing left for me. How then, you will say, can you subsist? Not by plunder, but by borrowing. A single harvest will set every thing to rights. Let others have their bishopricks ; my Cleeve is enough for me. Many of the bishops would most wilhngly change conditions with me ; though one or two perhaps, a little ambitious, might decHne doing so. And you must know, that I myself ' also was to be enrolled among then* number ; but I implored some of our leading men, and my intimate friends, that my name should be erased from the list which the queen has in her possession ; and though I could not effect this by my prayers and entreaties, yet I have hitherto, by their assistance, kept my neck out of that halter. When I was lately in London, one of the privy councillors, and Parker, the archbishop of Canterbury, threatened me with I know not what bishoprick. But I hope for better things ; for I cannot be ambitious of so much misery. I am king here in my parish, and for two years act as sole bishop. The bishop of Gloucester is living all this time away from hence ; but every third year he has some business to transact here, as also in other places. Thus much of my affairs, respecting which you desired in- formation. I thank you very much for your " astronomical insti- tutes." You have, moreover, made I know not what collections from Athanasius, and others. When do you mean to pubUsh? I was anxious to write you a very full letter, but am prevented by my various engagements. Salute in my name your excellent wife and recent bride, your Anna. Commend me most dutifully to Wonlycliius, and his very amiable Susanna. What I write to you I write to him. Salute also in my name masters Martyr, Bibliander, Bernardino, Lavater, Zuinghus, Frisius, Pellican, Liberian, Christopher Rotaker, Stum- phius, Renner, Hirter, your neighbours, male and female, and all. My wife salutes you and all the rest. Farewell. Bishop's Cleeve, Gloucestershire, Dec. 20, 1559. Yours, John Parkhurst. [1 He was consecrated bishop of Norwich, Sept. 1, 15G0. Stiype.] 76 J. CALVIN TO SIR W. CECIL. [lET. XXXVIII. J. CALVIN TO SIR W. CECIL. [B. 15.] Geneva, [after January 29, 1539'.] The messenger to •whom I gave in charge my commentaries upon Isaiah to be presented to the most serene queen, brought me ■word that my homage was not kindly received by her majesty, because she had been offended with me by reason of some writings® pubhshed in this place. He also repeated to me, most illustrious sir, the substance of a conversation held by you, in which you seem to me more severe than was consistent with your courtesy, especially when you had been already assured by my letter, how much I promised myself from your regard towards me. But though sufficient reasons prevent me from vindicating myself by a serious discussion, yet lest I should seem by my silence to confess in some measure the consciousness of having done wrong, I have thought it right to state, in few words, how the matter stands. Two years ago John Knox^ asked of me, in a private conversation, what I thought about the government of women. I candidly re- plied, that as it was a deviation from the original and proper order of nature, it was to be ranked, no less than slavery, among the punishments consequent upon the fall of man ; but that there were occasionally women so endowed, that the singular good qualities which shone forth in them, made it evident that they were raised up by divine authority ; either that God designed by such ex- amples to condemn the inactivity of men, or for the better setting forth his own glory. I brought forward Huldah and Deborah; \} Tliis letter seems to have been written after the one dated Jan. 29, 1559, in Calvin's letters, Ep. 275. The original is presei-ved in the archives of the church at Berne.] [^ One of these was composed by John Knox, and printed at Geneva, in the reign of queen Mary, about the year 1656 or 1557, and entitled The jirst blast against the monstrous regiment and empire of women. The other was printed by Christopher Goodman in 1558, and bare this title; How superior powers ought to he obeyed of their subjects, and ivherein they may lawfully he disobeyed and resisted. Wherein also is declared the cause of all this present misery in England, [namely, in queen Mary's time,] and tlie only way to remedy tlie same. See Strype, Annals, I. i. 177, &c. These books were answered by Aylmer, afterwards bishop of London, in a tract entitled " An Harborowo for faithful and trewo subjectes, against the late blowne blaste concerning the government of women," printed at Strasburgh, April 1559.] [3 Cecil, writing to Sadler and Croft, says, " Of all others, Knoxees name, if 'it be not Goodmans, is most odiouso here ; and therefore I wish no mention of hym hither." Sadler, i. 532.] XXXVIII.] J. CALVIN TO SIR W. CECIL. 77 and added, that God did not vainly promise by the mouth of Isaiah, that queens should be the nursing mothers of the church ; by which prerogative it is very evident that they are distinguished from females in private life. I came at length to this conclusion, that since both by custom and public consent and long practice it has been estabhshed, that realms and prmcipaUties may descend to females by hereditary right, it did not appear to me necessary to move the question, not only because the thmg would be uividious, but because in my opinion it would not be lawful to unsettle go- vernments which are ordained by the peculiar providence of God. I had no suspicion of the book, and for a whole year was ignorant of its pubhcation. When I was informed of it by certain parties, I sufficiently shewed my displeasure that such paradoxes should be pubhshed ; but as the remedy was too late, I thought that the evil which could not now be corrected, should rather be buried in oblivion than made a matter of agitation. Inquire also of your father-in-law^, what my reply was when he informed me of the cu'cumstance through Beza. And Mary was still living, so that I could not be suspected of flattery. What the books contain, I cannot tell ; but Knox himself will allow that my conversation with him was no other than what I have now stated. But although I was moved by the complaints of some godly men, yet, as I had not been informed in time, I did not dare to make any decided opposi- tion, lest greater confusion should ensue. If my easiness has occa- sioned any offence, I think there would have been just reason to fear, lest if the subject had been brought under consideration, by reason of the thoughtless arrogance of one individual, the wretched crowd of exiles would have been driven away not only from this city, but even from almost the whole world ; especially since the mischief could not now be remedied, otherwise than by applying a mitigation. I am indeed exceedingly and undeservedly grieved, in proportion to my surprise, that the ravings of others, as if on a studied pretext, should be charged upon me, to prevent my book from being accepted. If the offered present were not acceptable to the queen, she might have rejected it by a single word, and it would have been more candid to have done so. Tliis certainly would have been more agreeable to myself, than to be burdened with false accusations, in addition to the ignominy of a repulse. However, I shall always reverence both the most serene queen, and shall not cease, most illustrious sir, to love and respect yourself [^ Sir Antony Cook, whose daughter Mildred was man-ied to Sir William Cecil in 1546.] 78 J. CALVIN TO SIR W. CECIL. [lET. also, for your most excellent disposition and your other virtues, although I have found you less friendly to me than I had hoped, and though you say nothing about mutual good-will for the time to come. From this, however, I am miwilling to draw any unfavour- able conclusion. Farewell, most accomplished and esteemed sir. May the Lord evermore be present with you, guide, protect, and enrich you with his gifts. Geneva. As I am in doubt whether my former letter has reached you, I have thought right to send you a copy. [John Calvin,] XXXIX. T. SAMPSON TO P. MARTYR. [A. 27.] Jan. 0, [15C0.] I RECEIVED on the third of January the letter which you wrote on the fourth of November. I have now been in England one year, and that not a quiet one ; but I fear that the year now coining on will bring me yet more trouble. I am not however the only one who am afraid for myself, but we are all of us in fear for ourselves ; yet I dare not commit to writing the evils that seem to be hanging over us. I implore you therefore, most revered fathers, by Jesus Christ, and especially you, Peter [Martyr], my father and very dear master, to pray God most earnestly on our behalf. Contend for this, for this I say, that the truth of the gospel may be neither obscured nor overturned in England. I thank you, my much endeared father, for your promptitude in writing to me. You have satisfied my inquiries, as has also master Bullingcr ; may our God reward you both ! The consecra- tion of some bishops^ has already taken place. I mention, as being known to you by name, Dr Parker, [archbishop] of Canterbury, Cox, [bishop] of Ely, Grindal of London, Sandys of Worcester. One other, a native of Wales, is also a bishop^, but with whom you are not acquainted. Pilkington [bishop elect] of Winchester^, Bentham of Coventry, and your friend Jewel of Salisbury, will [1 The consecration of these prehxtcs took place in Dccemher, 1559 j that of Archbisliop Parker on the 17th ; and of the othei's on the 21st. Strype, Annals, i. i. 230, 232.] [2 Namely, Rowland Mcrick, consecrated bishop of Bangor, Dec. 21, 1559. tStrypc, as above.] [3 Ho was consecrated bishop of Durham, March 2, 15G0. Ilom was appointed to Winchester, Feb. 16th. Strype, Annals, i. i. 230.] XXXIX.] T. SAMPSON TO P. MARTYR. 79 follow shortly ; for they are soon, as I hear, to be consecrated, as we call it. I am yet loitering on the threshold, for there is neither ingress nor egress. Oh ! how glad should I be to find an egress ! God himself knows how much I desu-e it. Let others be bishops ; as to myself, I will either undertake the office of a preacher, or none at all : may the will of the Lord be done ! my father ! what can I hope for, when the ministry of Christ is banished from court ? while the crucifix* is allowed, with lights burning before it? The altars indeed are removed, and images also throughout the kingdom ; the crucifix and candles are retained at court alone. And the wretched multitude are not only rejoicing at this, but will imitate it of their own accord. What can I hope, when three of our lately appointed bishops are to officiate at the table of the Lord, one as priest, another as deacon, and a third as subdeacon, before the image of the crucifix, or at least not far from it, with candles, and habited in the golden vestments of the papacy ; and are thus to celebrate the Lord's supper without any sermon? What hope is there of any good, when our party are disposed to look for religion in these dumb remnants of idolatry, and not from the preachmg of the lively word of God ? What can I hope, when injunctions are laid upon those appointed to preach, not to handle vice with too much severity ; when the preachers are deemed intolerable, if they say any thing that is displeasing? But whither is my warmth of feehng carrying me away ? I must be silent, though I have scarcely touched upon the heads of the misery that is hanging over us. Eternal Lord, have mercy on us, through Jesus Christ, our God and Saviour. 1 will propose this single question for your resolution ; for I wish, my father, to employ you as my medium of correspondence with masters Bulhnger and Bernardino. It is this : whether the image of the crucifix, placed on the table of the Lord with lighted candles, is to be regarded as a thing indiftcrent ; and if it is not to be so considered, but as an unlawful and wicked practice, then, I ask, suppose the queen should enjoin all the bishops and clergy, either to admit this image, together with the candles, into their churches, or to retire from the ministry of the Avord, what should be our conduct in this case? Should we not rather quit the ministry of the word and sacraments, than that these rehcs of the Amorites should be admitted? Certain of our friends, indeed, appear in some measure inclined to regard these things as matters of indifference : for my own part, I am altogether of opinion, that \} Sec Strypc, Annals, i. i. 259.] 80 T. SAMPSON TO P. MARTYR. [lET. should this be enjoined, we ought rather to suifer deprivation. I now beg of you, my father, this once to perform your part : that is, to inform me as dihgently and speedily as possible, what your piety thinks of these matters, and what is the opinion of you all, I mean yourself, BulUnger, and Bernardino. His authority, I know, has very great weight with the queen. Should he at any time be disposed to write to her, to exhort her to persevere with all dili- gence in the cause of Christ, I can most cordially testify, what I certainly know to be the fact, and assert most confidently, that she is indeed a child of God. But she has yet great need of such ad- visers as liimself ; for what Augustine said to Boniface, is true of princes in general, namely, that they have many friends in their temporal concerns, and but few who are concerned for their souls. And what I am so anxious to obtain from him, I would also, if I dare, request from yourselves ; but I submit myself in this matter to your discretion. She is acquainted, as you know, with Italian, and also well skilled in Latin and Greek. If any thing is written in these languages either by yourself, or master Bernardine, I am quite of opinion, that you will not only afford much gratification to her majesty, but perform a most useful service to the church of England. May God for ever guide you by his spirit ! Farewell, and reply to me for this once as speedily as you can. Salute affectionately in my name master Bullinger, and your wife, and Julius. Communicate only to masters Bullinger and Bernar- dine what I have now written ; for I should be loth to have any rumours spread abroad under my name. I should not indeed have written this even to you, were it not that I hoped some good might ensue. You will perhaps either write, as I have above mentioned, or at least give me some good advice as to the question proposed. Act according to your godly discretion. Again fare- well. In haste. January 6, [1560]. Yours, Thomas Sampson. P. S. If either yourself or masters Bernardine or BulUnger should think of writing to the queen's majesty, you are well aware that it must not seem as if you had been urged by any one to do so. My friend Chambers cordially salutes you. My wife is afflicted with the ague. Jane is well, as I believe arc also Heton and his wife. I am living in the country, preaching Christ to the peasantry according to my measure. Pray God for me. Either Springham or Abel will take care that your letter is forwarded to me. XL.] BISHOP COX TO P. MARTYR. 81 XL. BISHOP COX TO P. MARTYR. [A. 28.] [London.]' It is a long time, my very dear friend in Christ, since I re- ceived your letter ; but the book which you so courteously dedi- cated to me, has not yet come to hand. I happened very lately to look into a httle book in the possession of some friend, which I found had been published with a dedication to myself. I acknow- ledge myself very much your debtor, even on this account, that some degree of notoriety has accrued by your means to such an obscure individual as I am ; for it is a matter of great importance to be commended by those who are themselves distinguished both for learning and piety. And I hope that I may, some time or other, by some little act of courtesy on my part, be in a position to deserve your kindness. I will not be wanting to myself : may the Lord second my desires ! I congratulate you on your new wife, and hope also to be able to congratulate you on a new offspring. We are here diligently exerting ourselves on behalf of your friend Juhus, and have already effected something. Richard Bruerne^, an excellent Hebraist, is in possession of your prebend. If you will send me your letters of attorney for the restoration of your stall, I may possibly be able to do something for you in that respect. As I was writing this, your book was brought to me as a pre- sent from the author. Respecting our affairs, what shall I write ? By the blessing of God, all those heads of religion are restored to us which we maintained in the time of king Edward. We are only constrained, to our great distress of mind, to tolerate in our churches the image of the cross and him who was crucified : the Lord must be entreated that this stumbling-block may at length be removed ^ The perfidy and ambition of the French [king], at the instiga- [1 This letter has no date, but must have been written after Dec. 21, 1559, when Cox was consecrated bishop of Ely.] [2 See note 3, p. 24.] [3 " Cox, bishop of Ely, being appointed to minister the sacraments before her there, [viz. the queen, in her chapel] made it a matter of con- science to do it in a place which he thought so dishonoured by images; and could scarce be brought to officiate there, denying it a gi*eat while; and when he did it, it was with a trembling conscience, as he said." Strype, Annals, i. i. 260, who has presented a letter which the bishop wrote to the queen on this subject.] 6 82 BISHOP cox TO p. MARTYR. [lET. tion of the antichrist of the church, are threatening to occasion us some trouble. The popish priests among us are daily relinquishing their ministry, lest, as they say, they should be compelled to give their sanction to heresies. Our enemies are many and mighty, but the Lord is mightier than all of them. Our neighbours, the Scots, have for the most part embraced the gospel, and are professing it under a heavy cross, which they are still forced to bear, through the violence of the French king, who is daily making attacks upon them, and contriving schemes for their extermination ; so that, unless there should arise help from some other quarter, an end will shortly be put both to them and to the gospel among them. Meanwhile they must be aided by the prayers of the godly. Greet your wife in my name, though unknown to me, and also Juhus. May the Lord Jesus very long preserve you to us in safety Your most affectionate and very dear brother in Christ, Richard Cox, Bishop of Ely, XLI. THE EARL OF BEDFORD TO R. GUALTER. [B. 16.] ^ LoNDOX, Jan. 21, 1560. Health in Christ. I received your^ letter written to me last January, and choose rather to answer it in this present January than not at all ; lest I should not only seem tardy in writing, but alto- gether unmindful of you, or forgetful of my duty in this respect. That it has not been performed sooner, you will interpret for the best, when you consider that we are separated by a very great distance, and cannot often light upon trustworthy persons to con- vey our letters to you. At length, however, to begin my reply, I would have you know, that the piety of your letter, the im- portance of your advice, your singular regard and sincere anxiety for our church, and the clear indication of your good-wiU towards myself, have been very gratifying to me ; and I thank you for your commendation and counsel. I wish 1 could deserve the praises you bestow upon me as my applauder : I wish I were able to fol- low the counsel of my adviser as much as I desire to do ; to act upon it, as well as keep it in my remembrance. I wish it were my happiaess to behold our affairs in such a state as I desire, and as \} See above, Letter VL p. 11.] XLI.] EARL OF BEDFORD TO R. GUALTER. 83 you recommend ; we should then be in a far more prosperous as well as a more exalted condition. But your prudence is such, that you cannot be ignorant that the first beginning of nascent affairs is attended with the most difficulty, and that the wisest counsels are not immediately followed by a happy result, but that it is accom- phshed by degrees ; and that rehgion, like every thing else, has crude and weak beginnings, as well as its increase, and progress, and maturity. And in reliance on a good hope, and reposing on the compassion of our most merciful God, I think that I can truly promise that this our rehgion, wounded and laid low as it were with a whirlwind by the tyranny of the time, and now, by God's blessing, again beginning in some measure to revive, will stiike its roots yet deeper and deeper ; and that which is now creeping on and advancing by little and little, will grow up with greater fruit - fulness and verdure. As far as I can, I am exerting myself in this matter to the utmost of my poor abilities : others too are labouring for the same object, to which especially is directed the godly dili- gence of certain preachers, and particularly of Jewel, now elected a bishop, and your friend Parkhurst ; to both of whom, excited by your commendation of them, as well as by the report of their vir- tues, I am most favourably disposed, as I ought to be, and consider them deserving of the greatest honour and advancement. We have need of these and other artificers and architects to build up the church of God. We have need also of your assistance. We com- mend ourselves and our England to you, and to your godly prayers. Pray that God may build up this house, already begun, into a holy temple, to the glory of his name and the consolation of his people ; and may he bless your pious labours. Farewell, most learned and courteous sir. Salute for me all my brethren in the Lord, to whom I wish every happiness. May Christ prosper your endeavours, that you may daily more and more exert yourselves to subvert and destroy the kingdom of Satan, the pomp of the world, and the power of antichrist, so that the chm'ch of Christ may be preserved among you and in all other places safe and unshaken. London, Jan. 21, 1560. Yours heartily, F. Bedford. 6—2 84 P, MARTYR TO T. SAMrSOX. [lET. XLII. P. MARTYR TO T. SAMPSON. [B. 17.] Zurich, Feb. 1, 1500. Greeting. I have received, my very dear brother in Christ, and most honoured master, two letters from you at the same time, namely on the 24th of January ; the one, dated in the month of October, the other in December. Wherefore you perceive how long they are in coming. I have already replied twice to your in- quiries ; but if my letters are intercepted, or are so long in reaching you, you must not charge me with neglect, but should rather lament the ill fortune of our letters than find fault with me as though I had discontinued my duty of writing. However, setting aside com- plaint, I come to the subjects upon which you require information. In the first place, I exhort you, by reason of the great want of ministers in your country, not to withdraw yourself from the function offered you : for if you, who are as it were pillars, shall decline taking upon yourselves the performance of ecclesiastical ofiices, not only will the churches be destitute of pastors, but you will give place to wolves and antichrists. By remaining without any office you will be so far from amending those things which you dishke, that you will hardly retain what is now conceded. But if you sit at the helm of the church, there is a hope that many things may be corrected, though not all. You say that they have taken away the church ^ lands ; but consider that you have not alienated them. These things have been done without your concurrence, so that there is no blame in this respect to be laid upon you. Mean- while, what income is left for the parochial clergy ? They must be maintained by the bishops. In this matter we must put our trust in God, who will open some way, and point out some means for their support. He feedeth the fowls of the air, he clothes the lilies of the field ; nor doth he ever forsake any one who is rightly walk- ing in his vocation. But you must take heed lest you be thought by those who seek occasions against you, as though you had an eye to wealth and personal interest. As to the square cap and episcopal habit in ordinary use, I do not think there is need of much dispute, seeing it is unattended by superstition, and in that kingdom especially there may be a po- \} The queen now (chiefly to gratify some of her courtiers) made ex- changes -with her bishops by the authority of a late act of parliament ; taking to herself their ancient good manors and lordships, and making over to them in exchange tithes and impropriations, Strype, Grindal, 42.] XLII.] r. MARTYR TO T. SAMPSON'. S5' litical reason for its use. Touching the garments which they call holy, I confess the case is somewhat more difficult, and one that troubles me not a little, so that I wonder they are so pertinaciously retained. For I should wish every thing to be done with the greatest possible simplicity. I think however that if peace could obtain between the churches of Saxony and our own with respect to doctrine, this sort of garments would never cause a separation ; for though we should by no means approve of them, we would nevertheless bear with them, congratulating ourselves upon our having got rid of them. You may therefore use those habits either in preaching, or in the administration of the Lord's supper, pro- vided however you persist in speaking and teaching against the use of them. But I can never recommend any one, either Avhen about to preach or to administer the Lord's supper, to have the image of the crucifix upon the table. As touching the correction of the papists for things past, you must remember that punishments have been more than once discon- tinued for the sake of peace ; and that an amnesty hath sometimes been granted in the church, and that heretics have been received with their former honours and dignities, provided only they would subscribe unto sound rehgion. Care however must be taken by you, that in future they do nothing in opposition to the religion now received. But as to those who are presented to you by their patrons to be promoted by reason of advowsons, such persons ought not to be instituted by you without subscribing to the religion which is now estabhshed ; Avhich if they Avill not do, I think you are at liberty to reject them. With regard to the unleavened bread which is used at the holy Supper, none of our churches, as you are well aware, have any contention about it, nay, indeed, they all every where make use of it. And whereas you write that very many persons are offended with the episcopal habits and the holy garments, as they call them, I can easily believe it. But you will avoid all blame in this matter, if you will shew in your sermons that they are also offensive to yourselves, and if you will endeavour by every means in your power that they may sometime be laid aside. But concerning those processions in Rogation-week, which seem to have been de- rived from the Ambarvalia'^ of the heathen, I scarcely know what I can rightly advise you. This I say, that superstition is altogether to [2 The Ambai-valia were solemn processions in honour of Ceres. Seo Virg. Georg. i. 338, &c.] 86 p. MARTYR TO T. SAMPSON. [lET. be avoided. But if in these processions only prayer is made to God, that he -svill graciously supply us with new fruits, and grant us a good use of them, and thanks be given at the same time for the sustenance of the year preceding, superstitions perhaps will seem to have been sufficiently avoided : although both magistrates and people should be instructed against such ceremonies, and every effort must be made to get rid of them as rehcs of the Amorites. These were the things, my brother, that I had to write at pre- sent. May God either commend these to your judgment, or suggest better! Upon the whole matter I have conferred with Master Bullinger, who both gives his assent, and sends you his hearty salutations. My wife too, with JuHus and Anna, desire their com- mendations to you and all yours. Zurich, February, 1560. Yours wholly, Peter Martyr. XLIII. BISHOP JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. [A. 29.] London, Feb. 4, 1560. Much health. my father ! what shall I write to you ? My materials are not great, but my time much less. However, as I know that you dehght in brevity, I will write briefly after your example. This controversy about the crucifix is now at its height. You would scarcely believe to what a degree of insanity some persons, who once had some shew of common sense, have been carried upon so foolish a subject. There is not one of them, however, with whom you are acquainted, excepting Cox. A disputation upon this subject will take place to-morrow. The moderators will be persons selected by the council. The disputants on the one side are the archbishop of Canterbury and Cox ; and on the other, Grindal the bishop of London and myself. The decision rests with the judges. I smile however, when I think with what grave and solid reasons they will defend their little cross. Whatever be the result, I will winte to you more at length when the disputation is over ; for the controversy is as yet undecided ; yet, as far as I can conjecture, I shall not again write to you as a bishop. For matters are come to that pass, that either the crosses of silver and tin, which we have every where broken in j)ieces, must be restored, or our bishopricks reUnquished. For your kind entertainment of my friend Frcnsham I return you, my father, the thanks 1 ought to do. Your letter first in- XLIII.] BISHOP JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. 87 formed me of his death. I know not what to say respecting the money which he left at Zurich on his decease ; for I have never seen his will myself, and my friend Randolph, who has seen it, is now in Scotland. However should there be any thing, I would by all means have provision made for my friend Julius. And I beg you to make it known to him in my name, that should there be any thing which Frensham has not bequeathed to any one by name, he may keep a portion for himself, and use his own discretion in the matter. Various reports, and all of them favourable, are announced from Scotland. And it must suffice, at present, to have told you this in one word ; for I have as yet notliing certain to relate as to the particulars. We have a large body of troops on the borders, and are bringing succour to the Scots, both by land and sea. Your guest Crito, and liis friend Pamphilus, are not idle. The saucy youth came to Athens, and won the good graces of Glyce- rium^. Do you know ? But what am I doing ? I am in want of time, overwhelmed with business, and unwillingly obhged to con- clude. You should know, however, that your friend White, the great and pojDular bishop of Winchester, Oglethorpe of Carhsle, Baines of Lichfield, and Tunstall the Saturn^ of Durham, all died [1 That the queen was courted by the earl of Arran, appears from the note in p. 42. The following extract from a letter of Sir N. Throgmorton to the queen will throw additional light upon this subject. It is dated Paris, August 25, 1559. " I perceive by his (the king of NavaiTe's) discourses to me, he wolde have yowe marry none of the house of Austria, neyther the earl of Arran, neither any that I have heard namyd. . .1 wolde wyshe your majestie should honorablye and very graciously receave the earl of Arran in your courte, geving hime as good hope as any other ; for yf he be the same that they here report of him, he is as well worthy as any other." Forbes's Full View, &c. Vol. i. p. 212. The interest manifested by the queen for the earl of Arran appears from her letter to Sir N. Throgmorton, of which an exti'act is given in p. 71. She added, however, "In anywise, let not hym think this our promptnesse to releve hym commeth uppon any other cause, than that in honer both for God's cause, and his parentage, we cannot permitt hym to be oppressed with this calamitee, adding hereunto the experience that we om'selves have in these and worse cases felt and yet passed, through the inestimable goodness of Almighty God." Forbes, p. 166. Agreeable to this is the instruction sent to Sir N. Throgmorton, that the earl " must be informed that this the queue's majesty's inclination to helpe hym is of hir princely natm-e, to releve such noble personages as be in adversite, uppon the experience of hir oune lyk trooble, and for the pre- servation of the sayd erle." Forbes, p. 171.] [2 He died Nov. 18, 1559, having lived to the age of eighty-five or eighty- six years. Strype, Annals, i. i. 213.] 88 BISHOP JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. [lET. some days since. Sampson is in the country, a long way off; Parkhurst in his kingdom \ You must not therefore be surprised, if they do not often wi'ite to you. Salute, I pray you, the most reverend father, master Bullinger, Bernadine, Wolfius, Herman, and Julius, to all of whom I would gladly write at this time, had I leisure. Salute the excellent lady your wife, and Anna, and my little Martyr. Heton, Abel, and their wives, Grindal, Sandys, Scory, Falconer, Aylmer, salute you ; and though they wish all good things for you, they nevertheless desire nothing more than England. However, as matters now stand, believe me, it is as well to be at Zurich. Farewell, my father, farewell. London, February 4, 1560. Your most devoted, John Jewel. XLIV. BISHOP COX TO G. CASSANDER. [B. 18.] Ely House, London, March 4, 1560. Were I to attempt, my very dear friend in Christ, to enumerate all your friendly offices towards me, I should indeed labour to no purpose. Meanwhile, you must know that they are treasured up in the inmost recesses of my heart, as obhgations which it will be imj)ossible for me ever to forget. After it seemed good to our Lord, on whose providence we evermore depend, to recall me to my country, I left "Worms among the foremost [of the exiles] and went to Cologne, in the hope of meeting both Cassander and Cor- nelius, and of bidding them farewell ; but I could find neither of them. From thence I proceeded straight to England, where, thank God, since the death of Mary, every thing is quiet. Ehzabeth, the lover and patron of godliness, is on the throne, and by her the popish superstition is driven away, the gospel of Christ re-established, the popish clergy banished, the shepherds of Christ restored. The Lord grant that we may shew forth our profession of the gospel of Christ by a life worthy of the gospel, lest hereafter a worse thing happen to us ! There is no open quarrel, but yet there does not exist an entire agreement among us with respect to setting up the crucifix^ in churches, as had heretofore been the practice. Some think it allowable, provided only that no worship or veneration be paid to the image itself : others are of opinion, that all images are [1 i. e. his rectory at CIccvc, where he calls himself king, p. 75.] [^ See above, Letter XL. p. 81.] XLIV.] BISHOP COX TO G. CASSANDEU. 89 SO universally forbidden, that it is altogether sinful for any to remain in churches, by reason of the danger so inseparably annexed to them. But we are in that state, that no crucifix is now-a-days to be seen in any of our churches. As I have always deferred very much to your judgment, I earnestly request you to be so kind as briefly to let me know your opinion upon this subject. I have nothing at this time worth writing to you about, except that our neighbours, the Scots, are under some apprehension from France, those especially who embrace the gospel, and who form a tolerably large proportion of the population. We must pray the Lord to vouchsafe to be on their side. I should be rejoiced to hear, on account of the respect I bear him, that your Dulvo is promoting the true reUgion of Christ in spite of all the papists. Farewell in Christ, my very dear Cassander, and salute your most faithful Achates, and my beloved masters Gerard the merchant, John and Gualter Gymnicus and Ambrosius, of Duisburg. From the city of London in England, at my house in Holborn. March 4, 1560. Your much attached, Richard Cox, Bishop of Ely. XLV. BISHOP JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. [A. 30.] London, March 5, 1560. Much health in Christ. Although these engagements of mine have the effect of making me write to you less frequently, they will never make me either love you less, or have you less frequently in my thoughts. For how can I do less, especially to one whom I ought to regard as a father ? I wrote to you not long since by our friend Burcher, by whom also I received your letter, though after a long interval ; for notwithstanding it was written at the beginning of October, I did not, I think, receive it till the thirteenth of January ; so long was he compelled to linger on the road. This, I imagine, has likewise not unfrequently been the case with respect to my letters to you ; and especially since our friend Abel has left Strasburgh, where there is no Englishman now remaining, who can undertake the management of these matters. Should the will of my friend Frensham be at this time sent to Frankfort, I have given a commission to Conrad, the servant of Arnold Birkman, an honest and trustworthy young man, to receive it from Froschover, and take it away with him, and keep it under his own care. For I shall not be in London when he returns, as 90 BISHOP JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. [lET. I have long been anxious to go to Salisbury, but have been pre- vented by a thousand hindrances. In the mean time, while I am detained here, I know not what Pan is tending my sheej) ! But I know nothing about that will and the money ; and can do nothing without Randolph. For if I did know, or were able to act, I would make over liberally, and without sohcitation, a certain sum to our friend Julius. But Randolph is still absent in Scotland, a long way off; so that I still keep by me unbroken the letters written to him both by Bullinger and yourself. Indeed, I do not see by what means they can be safely forwarded to him, at so great a distance. Religion is now somewhat more established than it was. The people are every where exceedingly inclined to the better part. The practice of joining in chm'ch music has very much conduced to this. For as soon as they had once commenced singing in public, in only one little church in London, immediately not only the churches in the neighbourhood, but even the towns far distant, began to vie with each other in the same practice. You may now sometimes see at Paul's cross, after the service, six thousand per- sons, old and young, of both sexes, all singing together and praising God. This sadly annoys the mass-priests, and the devil. For they perceive that by these means the sacred discourses sink more deeply into the minds of men, and that their kingdom is weakened and shaken at almost every note. There is nothing, however, of which they have any right to complain : for the mass has never been more highly prized within my memory; each being now valued, to every individual spectator, at not less than two hundred crowns. Your friend White, who so candidly and kindly^ wrote against you, is dead, as I think, from rage ; and religion, which you may be surprised at, has not suffered in the least. It sorely vexed this patient man to see both himself and his party laughed at by the very boys in the streets. If our friend .Julius should come over to me, he shall not want for either board, or clothing, or money ; for I greatly esteem and wish him well, not only for your sake, to whom I owe every thing, but also for his own. However, as matters are at present, my advice is that he should wait a little, till the present confusion shall have subsided. Meanwhile, my father, do not suppose that there are none here who think of you in your absence. Your Divinity lecture at Oxford is still kept open, and, as I hope, for no [1 The work here alluded to is, " De veritate corporis et sanguinis Christi in Sacramento altaris, contra Petrum Martyi*em Hsereticum."] XLV.] BISHOP JEWEL TO P. MAKTYR. .91 one but yourself, if you are so disposed. Cecil is your friend. (Sir) William Petre speaks of you with the greatest kindness. After a while, when the work is finished, and the affairs of rehgion and the state thoroughly settled, should you be spontaneously and honourably recalled, in the name both of the queen, who still bears you in mind, and of the commonwealth, I entreat you not to be unwilHng to return. You will return, I hope, to men who are not ungrateful, and who still remember you with kindness. Farewell, my father, my pride, and the better half of my own soul. Salute in my name your wife, and your dear little boy. Salute masters Bullinger, Gualter, Simler, Lavater, Gesner, Haller, WoMus, Frisius, and especially Bernardine, (whose affairs here I could wish to see more speedily settled,) the most talented young Herman, Julius, his wife, and my little Martyr. Farewell, my father, farewell. Oh ! that I may sometime or other be allowed to say, " My father, how do you do ?" London, March 5, 1560. Your most attached friend, John Jewel, Bishop of Sahsbury. This, if I am not mistaken, is my 13th letter. You will per- ceive whether they have all reached you. Should master Lselius return to his head quarters, salute him, I pray you, in my name. XLVI. G. CASSANDER TO BISFIOP COX. [B. 19.] Dated at [Woums, 15G0.] I HAVE received from you, reverend sir, a letter^ written at London on the 4th of ]\Iarcli ; the reason of my tardy and brief reply to which has been a severe illness, which attacked me shortly after the receipt of it, and from which I have hardly yet begun to recover. I was glad to hear of your advancement to the dignity, or rather the work and office, of a bishop ; and I pray God to grant you his Spirit, by whose aid you may fulfil that office to your own salvation and the edification of the flock committed to your charge. And I thank you too, that notwithstanding your elevation to so great a dignity, you have not been unmindful of my inferiority and lowliness ; and I willingly accepted your little pre- sent of two crowns, which were inclosed in the letter, as a memorial of our former intimacy. I understand that you are not altogether agreed among your- [2 See above, Letter XLIV.] 92 G. CASSANDER TO BISHOl' COX. [lET. selves with respect to the setting up the image of the cross or the crucifix in the church ; but I do not sufiiciently understand whether the question refers to the mere figure of a cross, or also to the image of Christ hanging upon it. I have seen here a certain print, which contained a cross only in the middle, with some texts of holy scripture in the English language written on each side ; whence I suspect that your question only refers to the figure of the cross. But I acknowledge your modesty in requesting my opinion upon this matter : for when you abound in so many copious fountains yourselves, why should you drink water from so insignificant and turbid a streamlet ? As however you desire it, I will briefly declare my sentiments. Your excellence is aware, in what frequent use and in what great esteem the figure of the cross was held among the early Christians ; insomuch that it was every where placed and represented in their buildings, sacred and profane, pubhc and private ; and this too before the practice of setting up other images in the churches, whether of Christ himself, or of the saints, had come into use ; that on the destruction of all monuments of idolatry, by which every thing was defiled, the figure of the cross, which was as it were a sacred symbol of Christianity, succeeded under better auspices into their place. And like as the word cross in the writings of the evangelists and apostles mystically signifies the passion, death, and triumph of Christ, and the afflictions of the saints ; so also by the figure of the cross every where set up, and meeting the eye, they intended all these things to be set forth, as it were by a mystic symbol, and infixed in men's minds : wherefore they made a great distinction between the figure or representation of the cross, and all other images. Upon which subject you may see Charlemagne', Lib. ii. c. xxviii. against the synod of the Greeks : for in the latter there is a simple and bare signification, while in the former there is a secret and mystical representation. Whence it was not regarded as a bare sign, but as a kind of mystery ; so that it was not only represented substantially and by painting, [1 The title of this chapter is, " Quanta ratione mystenum dominicso crucis ab imaginibus distet, quas quideni illi eidem sequipararc contendunt." One sentence from this chapter may bo quoted : Non ergo per materiales ab opificibus conditas imagines, sed per crucis mysterium, qua? a Judseis putatur scandalum, a gentibus stultitia, superba sceculi et inflata sapientia con'uit. Nee per picturam (juandam, sed per crucem patuit, quod stultum Dei est, quanto sit hominibus sapientius, et quod infirmum Dei est, quanto sit fortius hominibus. Caroli M. dc impio imaginum cultu. Lib. iv. Han- overa;, 1731.] XI.Vr.] G. CASSANDER TO BISHOP COX. 9S both in churches and other buildings, and upon the walls of houses, but was also frequently signed by the hand upon the forehead and breast : to which fact the most ancient ecclesiastical writers, both Greek and Latin, unanimously bear witness. This observance therefore, as it is of the greatest antiquity throughout all churches, I am unwilling should be regarded as superstitious, though I would have the superstition of the people, which is commonly discovered even in the most excellent regulations and institutions, to be repressed and guarded against; and this seems to have been your object in that representation which I saw here. But take it, I pray you, in good part, if I freely state what I consider wanting in it. First of all, in representing this figure of the cross, I could wish that regard were had to the appearance and form of its archetype, that is, of the true cross on which our Saviour was offered ; which also, were it attended to in other images of illustrious and holy men, would occasion less inconve- nience : namely, that they might be preserved and looked upon only as memorials, in the same manner as we see at this day the effigies of the Roman emperors and other illustrious personages preserved in medals. Moreover, it is evident what was the form of the cross, both from some ancient images and statues, some of which I have seen, and very clearly from that most ancient writer Irena3us^ and a more recent one, Gregory of Tours ; and which is also supported by the reason of the thing itself. For how, I ask, could it be possible for a human body, weighed down at the approach of death, and hanging down in a stretched out position, not to tear asunder by its bulk and weight the palms of the hands that were nailed to the cross ? And the possibility of this occur- rence was so provided against, that about the middle of the stand- ing and upright post there was let in a little board, upon which rested the feet of the person doomed to this punishment ; and the nails were fastened in such a way that the appearance was not so much that of a man hanging as one standing. The words of Irenaeus are plain. " The form of the cross," he says, '• has five ends and extremities, two in the length, two in the breadth, and one in the middle, upon which the person who is fixstencd with the nails rests his weight." To this entirely agrees Gregory of Tours. " The reason therefore," says he, " that there were four nails in our Lord's cross is this : two were fastened to his hands, and two to the soles of his feet ; and the question is, why the feet were [2 Irenseus was born a. d. 140, and sutforod martyrdom a. d. 202. Gregory of Tours was born a. d. 543, and died a. n. 505.] ^ 94 G. CASSANDER TO BISHOP COX. [lET. nailed, which in the holy cross rather seemed to hang down than to stand. But it is evident that an opening was made in the upright post, and that the end of a small board was let in to this opening, and upon this board Avere nailed the sacred feet, as it were those of one in a standing posture^." I have seen represen- tations of a cross of tliis kind of a considerable size, not only some pourtrayed many years ago in this country, but also a very remark- able one painted in the remotest part of Armenia, and which an Armenian priest used to carry about with him in his prayer-book, described in the language and characters of his nation ; in all which figures a little board of this kind was evidently jutting out, according to the description of Irenseus and Gregory of Tours : which things, although some persons may deem them too trifling, 1 do not think will be displeasing to others who have a regard for what is decent. Another point that I propose to lay before you, is, whether it would not be more suitable, if, instead of those texts of scripture with which you have surrounded and fenced on all sides that figure of the cross, there were written such texts as explain the mystery and hidden signification of it ; which are both sufficiently numerous in the writings of the new testament, and exceedingly well adapted to the instruction of the people, and contain the whole mystery both of our redemption by Christ and of our regeneration in Christ. Of which kind are those in the second chapter of the Epistle to the Colossians [vv. 13 — 15.] And you, being dead in sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, hath he quickened together with him, having forgiven you all trespasses; blotting out the hand-ivriting of ordinances that tuas against us, ivhich was contrary to us, and took it out of the ivay, nailing it to his cross ; and having spoiled principalities and powers, he made a shew of them openly, triumphing over them in himself Also in chap. i. [vv. 18 — 20.] And he, that is, the Son of God, is the head of the body, the church; ivho is the beginning, the first-born from the dead, that in all things he might have the pre-eminence : for it p)l^cLsed [the [1 Irenseus, cont. Hseres. Lib. ii. c. 24. Ipse habitus crucis fines et summitatcs habet quinquc, duos in lougitudine, et duos in latitudine, et unum in medio, ubi requiescit qui clavis afligitur. Greg. Turon. do Glor. Mart. Lib. l. cap. 6. Clavorum ergo Dominicorum gratia, quod quatuor fuerint hsec est ratio : duo sunt affixi in palmis, ct duo in plantis, et quajritur cur planta; affixaj sint, qua; in cruce sancta dcpendere visa sunt potius quam stare. Scd in stipite erccto foramen factum manifostum est. Pes quoque parvuke tabukx; in hoc foramen insertus est. Super banc vero tabulam tan- quam stantis hominis sacrae affixce sunt plantse.] XLVI.] G. CASSANDER TO BISHOP COX. 95' Father~\ that in him should all fulness dwell, and making peace through the blood of his cross, by him to reconcile all things unto himself, whether they be things in earth, or things in heaven. And in Gal. vi. [14.] But God forbid that I should glory, save in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, by which the world is crucified unto me, and I unto the ivorld. And 1 Cor. i. [17.] Lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect. Gal. ii. [19.] L'or J through the law am dead to the law, that I might live unto God. I am crucified tvith Christ. And Matt. x. [38.] lie that taketh not his cross, and folloiveth after me, is not worthy of me. And chap. xvi. [24.] If any man will come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross, and folloiu me. These and similar texts would instruct the people in the true use of the mystery of the cross : but this you will with your wisdom determine better than I can. I should be very indiscreet in thus pretending to teach you, did I not think it improper for me not to declare in some way or other my respect for you. You will, I doubt not, receive this my rude and unpohshed writmg with the same modesty and courtesy with which you have written to me. Farewell. George Cassander. XLVII. P. MARTYR TO T. SAMPSOm [B. 20.] Zurich, March 20, 1560. Greeting. I have not replied before to the letter that you wrote to me on the sixth of January, because I did not receive it until the first of March, and at Zurich couriers are not easily to be met with. IVow you must be persuaded of this, that those things which grieve you and others Uke you, do also very much grieve both myself and my brethren. But I do not think it worth while to reply to your questions a second time, because I suppose all my letters have reached you, in which I gave such answer as I was able, though perhaps not such as the subject required, or so much as you yourself wished for : nevertheless I said what then seemed to be to the purpose. The things which you fear, we can avert from you no otherwise than by our prayers, which, believe me, we diligently offer and will continue to do. Finally, to come to your last question ; to have the image of the crucifix upon the [2 Strypo (Life of Grindal, 47) refers to this letter as addressed to Bishop Grindal ; but it rather seems to have been written in reply to that of Samp- son, above, Letter XXXIX. p. 78.] 9G p. MARTYR TO T. SAMPSOX. [lET. holy table at the administration of the Lord's supper, I do not count among things indifferent, nor would I recommend any man to distribute the sacraments with that rite. But you, who are in the very midst of the contest, must not expect counsel from hence, as we are at so great a distance from you : you must take coimsel on the field of contest itself. A calling is not rashly to be thrown away, nor yet to be undertaken with injury to the truth. The sum of the matter is, that the worshipping of images must in no wise be tolerated. Neither master Bullinger nor myself count such things as matters of indifference, but we reject them as for- bidden. Unless however you are driven to this strait, do not refuse the ministry that is offered you. As to writing a letter to the queen upon this matter, you must understand that I am now so overwhelmed with business, that were I ever so willing, I should not have it in my power. For I have been the sole lecturer in the school for nearly two months, the reason of which there is no occasion to commit to writing. Besides this, I do not think that any letter of mine will have much weight. I have already written twice, publicly and privately, and have been unable to discover whether my letters were received. More- over, if, as it is reported, it be the determination of your country- men to embrace the Confession of Augsburgh, and court an alliance with the [German'] protestants, you may judge for yourself in what esteem ray letters, and the letters of those like me, will be held. The only thing I can do, I will not fail to do ; namely, to pray that your state and church, together with your most serene queen, may flourish in all happiness. I have communicated your letter, as you wished me, to master Bernardino. He is in a weak state of health, both through old age and the diseases incident to that time of hfe : yet he did not decline the oflice of writing [to the queen,] but promises to do so as soon as he is able. As to Bullinger, I have no doubt but that be will write, for he is exceedingly zealous in this matter; but though he has read your letter, he has not yet pointed out any suggestions that I can inform you of. But you are indeed wonder- ful people. You pay no attention to the public letter of the Swiss, nay, you do not even answer it : how much notice, I pray you, will private letters obtain from you ? But keep these things to yourself, and do not send any answer to them, for fear the letter should be lost or intercepted. Farewell. Master Bullinger, all [1 The Gcnnan protestants retained the crucifix in their churches. Strype, Grindal, 48. See above, p. 21, note G.] XLVn.] p. MARTYR TO T. SAMPSON. 97 our fellow-ministers, my wife, Julius and his wife, salute you. A son was born to me on the second of March, and died on the tenth. Salute all your friends in my name, and cease not to love your Martyr. March 20, 1560. Yours wholly, Peter Martyr. XLVIII. BISHOP SANDYS TO P. MARTYR. [A. Si.] London, April 1, 15G0. Health in Christ. That I have not written to you, reverend sir, of so long a time, does not proceed from any forgetfulness of ray duty to you, or from any light estimate of what your kindness deserves at my hands ; but having been overwhelmed with a mul- titude of engagements, I unwilHngly put off for a while the business of writing, which, now the opportunity of sending a letter is afforded me, I perceive can no longer be delayed. When I wrote to you at the beginning of August, I was sent by the command of the queen into the northern parts of England^, as an inspector and visitor, as they call it, for the purpose of removing the abuses of the church, and restoring to it those rites which are consistent with true rehgion and godliness ; and having been employed in those quarters up to the beginning of November, in a constant discharge of the duties entrusted to me, and with excessive fatigue both of body and mind, I at last returned to London. New labours here awaited me on my arrival, and an increased weight of business was laid upon my shoulders ; for my services were required by the queen for the government of the see of Worcester ; and the episcopal office is at length imposed upon me, though against my inclination. I wished, indeed, altogether to decline this bishoprick, as I did that of Car- lisle, to which I had been nominated before ; but this could not be done without drawing upon myself the displeasure of the queen, and in some measure deserting the church of Christ. While this was going forward, Burcher delivered mo your [2 The commissioners were Francis, earl of Shrewsbury, president of the council in the north ; Edward, earl of Derby ; Thomas, earl of Northum- berland, lord warden of the east and middle marches ; Thomas, Lord Evers, Henry Percy, Thomas Gargrave, James Crofts, Henry Gates, Knts; Edwin Sandys, D.D., Henry Ilarvey, LL.D., Richard Bowes, George Brown, Chris- topher Escot, and Richard Kingsmcl, Esq. The commission began at St Mary's Nottingham, Aug. 22, 1559, Die Martis. Strype, Annals, i. i. 245, &c.] 7 98 BISHOP SANDYS TO P, MARTYR. [lET. letter, full of all kindness ; which, however, I delayed to reply to by him on his departure from hence, partly because our English affairs being at that time not much altered, but remaming in pretty much the same state, afforded very few materials for writing ; and partly, because my new burden (for it may be more truly called so than an honour) distracted me most wonderfully with cares and en- gagements. And thus, my most esteemed sir, you have the reason of my long silence. The doctrine of the Eucharist, as yet by God's blessing unim- pugned, remains to us, and we hope will continue to remain, pure and inviolate. For both myself and my episcopal brethren will maintain it, by God's help, to the utmost of our power, as long as we live. We had not long since a controversy respecting images \ The queen's majesty considered it not contrary to the word of God, nay, rather for the advantage of the church, that the image of Christ crucified, together with [those of the virgin] Mary and [Saint] John, should be placed, as heretofore, in some conspicuous part of the church, where they might more readily be seen by all the people. Some of us [bishops] thought far otherwise, and more especially as all images of every kind were at our last visitation not only taken down, but also burnt, and that too by public authority ; and because the ignorant and superstitious multitude are in the habit of paying adoration to this idol above all others. As to my- self, because I was rather vehement in this matter, and could by no means consent that an occasion of stumblinp; should be afforded to the church of Christ, I was very near being deposed from my office, and incurring the displeasure of the queen. But God, in whose hand are the hearts of kings, gave us tranquilhty instead of a tempest, and delivered the church of England from stumbling- blocks of this kind : only the popish vestments remain in our church, I mean the copes ; which, however, we hope will not last very long. How much injury England is now receiving by your absence, as to the affairs of the church and rchgion, I am accustomed very frequently and earnestly to impress upon those to whom is com- mitted the management of the state. But their minds are so much occupied with other matters of the greatest importance, that nothing, I see, has been hitherto determined Avith respect to inviting you back. The queen I know was at one time very desirous of recalling you : you will easily comprehend, I suppose, what prevented it. The cause of Christ has always many adversaries, and the best [1 See p. 80.] XLVIII.] BISHOP SANDYS TO P. MAKTYR. 99 persons are always the worst spoken of. This pretence of unity is daily giving rise to many divisions. I congratulate you on your new marriage, and pray that it may be happy and prosperous ; as I also wish for myself, who have lately entered into the same state of matrimony". There is a won- derful preparation for war, partly to repel the French forces, if, in attempting to subjugate Scotland, they should invade our borders ; and partly to aid the Scots against the French, if the latter at any time should violate the treaty of peace ^ that they have made with us. God grant that all things may turn out to the glory of his name, and the advancement of the gospel. I have thought it right to let you know these things by letter, before I set oif for Worcester, where I hope to arrive shortly. But I should have written more fully, did I not know that my brother Jewel, the bishop of Salisbury, has given you frequent and dihgent information about aU our affairs. Should I be able to serve you in any way, behove me, my honoured Peter, you may use my services as long as I live (nay, were it possible, even after life), according to your discretion. Salute very much in my name, I entreat you, the illustrious master Bulhnger. I am a letter in his debt ; indeed, I owe every thing to him, and, should opportunity arise, I will repay him as far as I am able. Salute your wife, Juhus and his wife, Herman, Paul, and my little Martyr, to all of whom I wish every happiness. Farewell, most courteous, learned, and much esteemed master Peter. In haste. London, April 1, 1560. Yours from my heart, Edwin Worcester. XLIX. T. SAMPSON TO P. MARTYR. [A. 32.] LoKDOx, May 13, 15C0. Released at length, by the power of God, from the cares of episcopacy \ I am enabled, my most esteemed father, to converse with you more freely than usual. But lest you should suppose [^ This second wife was Cecilia, daughter of Thomas Wilford, of [Has- tridge, in] the county of Kent, Knight. Strype, Annals, m. ii. 65.] [3 April 8, [1559] peace was proclaimed between the queen and Hemy the French king, the Dauphin of France, and Scotland, for ever. Strype, Annals, i. i. 283.] \} It seems that Norwich was the bishopric that was offered to him. Burnet, Hist. Reform, in. 440.] 7—2 ] 00 T. SAMPSON TO P. MARTYR. [lET. that I am set free by any fault of my own, I would give you an account of the whole affah", did not want of time prevent me, wearisomeness dissuade me, and some other circumstances seem to forbid me. Meanwhile I entreat you thus much, not to give too easy a credence to every informant. For not only many of those persons who are most inclined to speak freely about it, are quite in ignorance of the real state of the case ; but others also, who arc still your friends, as they formerly were mine, and who know more themselves than they wish me to know, will perhaps relate to you (if they tell you any thing at all) what is not exactly the truth. I do not write this either as lamenting my own lot, or the injury I have received from others. I feel nothing of the kind ; all I desire is, that when you hear of this matter, you will suspend your judg- ment till you hear, if ever you do hear it, the whole state of the case. If I am not mistaken, I have received all your letters, and return you my best thanks for having given me such advice on the subject ; and I had altogether determined to adopt your wholesome counsel, and that of master Bullinger ; but the thing was never carried so far as to compel me to that step. My friend Parkhurst now holds the bishopric in question, namely, of Norwich, and I wish him every success, as we all do. The danger of any im- proper person obtaining that see was well provided against : to God Almighty be the praise. My own unfitness too, under the circum- stances, was at the same time well considered. I scarcely know how to be sufficiently thankful to the Lord God. Do you, my father, praise him, and do not cease to pray for me. Religion is flourishing among us as heretofore, and I pray that it may flourish more and more to maturity. We are now on the point of being involved in war. May the Lord vouchsafe also to deliver us for the glory of his name ! We are in fear of evil, and that to a great extent ; nor will it be undeserved. But may the good Father of mercies come to our aid, and in his compassion re- lieve us from our troubles ! In a word, I must say, that our state of aff'airs is such as to demand the repeated prayers of every godly person. You have therefore England most earnestly commended to your prayers. Farewell, my excellent father, and most esteemed master. Salute most dutifully in my name master Bullinger, likewise your wife and children, Julius, and all your friends. Again farewell. London, May 13, 15G0. Yours, Thomas Sampson. L.] BISHOP JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. 10 J L. BISHOP JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. [A. 83.] London, May 22, 1560. Much health. If, as you tell me, eight of my ten letters have reached you, my very dear friend and father, there is much less loss than I expected ; fur I could never entertain the hope that even one third of the number would arrive in safety. But although they are, as usual, idly loitering on the road, or lying hid in some place or other, or even lost on the journey, I shall not on that account desist from doing my duty ; nor shall I ever so act as to seem inclined to get rid of my engagement, through the treacher- ousness of the courier. For believe me, I am never employed more to my satisfaction than when I am either writing to you, or think- ing about you. Hence, how often do I imagine myself at Zurich, and, agreeably to the delightful intimacy that exists between us, fancy that I am now hearing you, now conversing with you ; to the end that, although I cannot in reality enjoy that pleasure, I may at least enjoy an ideal and shadowy gratification ! But when our affairs are settled, and peace established, and the government placed on a firm footing, as I hope will shortly be the case, I shall dismiss these shadows and idealities, and, I hope, behold you face to face. For you ought to know that this is anxiously endeavoured both by myself and all good men. In the mean time, our universi- ties, and more especially Oxford, are most sadly deserted ; without learning, without lectures, without any regard to rehgion. The blind deity will some time or other be more favourable to us. But at present you see what is the character of these times. War, destructive war, is utterly draining the very source of wealth. As soon as a calm shall return, and these disorders shall have subsided, there shall not be wanting to your Eleazar^ of Damascus either that which you mention, or other things of more importance. If he should, or rather when he shall, come to me, I shall regard him as a brother. I do not assume so much to myself as to be able to afford you any consolation concerning your Eliperius". But I know your good sense, and that you are wont to anticipate by reflection that com- fort which time would otherwise impart. I wish, however, that you [1 Julius Santerentianus, the attendant of Peter Martyr.] [^ Eliperius seems to have been the son who, Peter Martyr writes to Sampson on March 20, 15G0, "was born unto mo the 2nd day of March, and died the 10th day of March."] 102 EISIIOP JEWEL TO 1'. MARTYR. [lET. could have had, especially in your declining years, a son to survive you, so endearing, and so like yourself; not only to have amused you with liis prattling, but also to have been the inheritor of your talents and piety, of all your virtues, and of your learning. But since the great and good God has willed things to be as they are, they cannot be better than as they are. Respecting those five Italian crowns, I have written three times to our friend Julius, and twice to master Bernardine. But I de- livered them seven months since to Acontius, an Italian, who is now with the earl of Bedford. He promised to take care that they should be sent over to Zurich most faithfully, and at the earliest opportunity. I am surprised therefore that in all this time Bernar- dine has neither received his money, nor had any intelhgence either from me or from Acontius. The will of our friend Frcnsham has been placed in my hands. Those two hundred crowns are still at Antwerp, in the care of Ar- nold Birkman, with whom they are as safe as if I had them myself. Pamphilus is in Scotland, diligently exerting himself for his friend Crito. The business therefore will not be entered upon till his re- turn. On the seventh of May the great spire of my cathedral at Salisbury was, not merely struck, but so shattered by lightning, that a continued fissure was made from the top for sixty feet downwards : consider whether there is any thing ominous in this circumstance. It so happened that I had not yet arrived there : had I done, so, so foolish and superstitious are men's minds, that all this mischief would have been ascribed to my coming. I shall, however, go thither to-morrow, and put my hand to the plough. May God prosper his own cause ! Peter Alexander^ came to me on the first of May, and after some days was completely reinstated in his prebend. He is now staying in London Avith your friend Ileton, and preaching in the French church. Crito is in high favour. Whatever enemies he had heretofore, he has at length by his piety and discretion converted into friends. This our friend Pamphilus has made known to me by letter ; but concerning all these matters I am writing more fully to master Bullinger. Our friend Falconer is dead. Parkhurst is made bishop of [1 Of Ai-les. He was encouraged to come over to England by arclibishoi) Cranmer, in 1547, and was made a prebendary of Canterbury, and rector of AUhallows, Lombard-street. Strype, Memor. ii. i. 321.] L.] BISHOP JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. 103 Norwich. Bonner'-^, the monk Feckenham^ [Dr] Pate*, [Dr] Story the civilian, and Watson, are sent to prison, for havmg obstmately refused attendance on public worship, and every where declaiming and raihng against that rehgion Avhich we now profess. For the queen, a most discreet and excellent woman, most manfully and courageously declared that she would not allow any of her subjects to dissent from this religion with impunity. We are raising forces in all quarters, and making all manner of preparation for war. If the French should come, they will not, I hope, find us unprepared. Yet, as the times now are, that enemy ^ has not so much leisure at home as to allow of his interference in the concerns of others. May God at length put an end to these disorders, that when our affairs are settled, we may be able to re- call you to England ! For, believe me, there is no one living about whom our friends are wont to discourse more frequently, or with greater interest and respect. Cecil, with whom I dined yesterday at court, KnoUes, and Wroth, desired me to salute you very much in their name. And, what perhaps you would hardly expect, Sir William Petre, when he heard you mentioned, earnestly entreated me to do the same for him. Give my kind remembrances to the excellent lady yom' wife, BuUinger, Gualter, Lavater, Gesner, Haller, Simler, Wolfius, Frisius, Herman, Paullus, my friend Julius, his wife, and the little Martyr ; to all of whom, and to the whole church and common- wealth of Zurich, I pray and desire every blessing. Farewell, my father, my father, farewell. Farewell, my most esteemed master in Christ. I commend our church and cause to your prayers. London, May 22, 1560. Most cordially and sincerely yours, John Jewel. [2 Sent to the Marshalsea April 20. He grew old in prison, and died a natural death in the year 1569. Strype, Annals, i. i. 214.] [3 May 20th, Fcckeiiham, late abbot of Westminster, Watson, late bishop of Lincoln, Cole, late dean of St Paul's, Cliedsey, late archdeacon of Mid- dlesex, at liberty, as it seems, before, were all sent to the Tower. And the same day, at eight o'clock at night, Dr Story, the civilian, was sent to the Fleet. Strype, Annals, i. i. 220.] [^ Ho went away privately beyond sea, after some confinement in the Tower, where he was again a prisoner in 1563, perhaps for presuming to sit in the council of Trent. Strype, Aimals, i. i. 215.] p The Guises discovered a conspiracy among the French nobles at home, which made them desirous of recalling their army from Scotland for then* own protection.] 104 I5ISH0P JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. [lET. LI. BISHOP JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. [A. 34.] SALisrsuRi', June 1, 1560. Much health in Christ. I wrote to you, ray father, not long since, two days before I left London ; and gave my letter as I was going aAvay, to our friend Heton, that it might be forwarded to you by the first opportunity. Now, since I have come among my people at Salisbury, though there is no diminution in my regard for you, yea, though it is in many respects increased, and is daily increasing, by your very long, and to me most painful, absence ; yet my opportunities of letter writing seem not to be what they were some time since. For I am now far distant from the crowd and bustle [of London], and am much less conversant with passing events ; and when I am ever so much inchned to write, I cannot meet with a com'ier who is going your way. However, I will write, whatever it may be ; aye, even though it be nothing at all. My letter may be lost on the road, if it should so happen ; but my re- gard, and respect, and affection for you Avill never perish. The time, I hope, will at length arrive, when we may be able to salute each other in person. Should I ever see that day, and live to welcome you [in England], I shall think that I have lived long enougii. This subject is one of great interest to us all ; and we do not see what should hinder you, unless perhaps, as I suspect, and as I have sometimes written to you, that Peter and Paul' have stopped the way to your return. Woe betide such apostles ! Your lectureship, however, is still vacant, and I do not know for whom it should rather be kept open than for yourself. In the mean time every thing there is falhng into ruin and decay ; for the colleges are now filled with mere boys, and empty of learning. Smith is gone into AVales, where, they say, he has taken a wife, with the view, I suppose, of refuting all your arguments. How- ever this may be, he boasts of his grey hairs and empty head. He now keeps a victualling house, and gains his livehhood by a hired tavern, despised by our friends and his own; by those who know him, and those who do not; by old and young, by himself, by every one. Our friend SidalP is a disciple of Harpocrates, and conceals his opinions ; so that he is now reckoned neither among the birds nor beasts. He is, as you know, and as I also am convinced, a good sort of man, and one who esteems and loves you. And perhaps, when he sees our forces increased, he will lay aside this dissembling, [1 Vergerius. Sec above, p. 31, n. 5.] [^ See above, p. 29, n. 2.] LI.] BISHOP JEWEL TO P. MARTYK. 105 and join us of his own accord, and openly come forward. But in mustering an army some one must needs be hindmost. Some of the Marian bishops are in the tower. The bishop^ of London is in his old lodging, which he formerly occupied in king Edward's time. When he was conveyed thither, and had arrived in the interior of the prison, where (being a most courteous man, and gentlemanly both in his manners and appearance) he politely saluted the prisoners who were present, and addressed them as his friends and companions; one of them immediately disclaimed this, and cried out, " Do you take me, you brute, for a companion of yours ? Go to hell, as you deserve ; you will find companions there. As for me, I only slew one individual, and that not without reason ; while you have causelessly murdered vast numbers of holy men, martyrs of Christ, witnesses and maintainers of the truth. Besides, I indeed am sorry for what I did, while you are so hardened that I know not whether you can be brought to repentance." I write this, that you may know in what a state he must be, when even wicked and abandoned men reject and avoid him, and will not endure him in their society. There is a prevailing report, which is indeed confirmed, both by the common discourse of many persons, and also by letter, that our forces have at length, after a long siege, taken Leith* by capi- tulation, and driven out the French garrison with only the clothes on their backs. There are various rumours respecting the terms, but we have not yet received any certain information. It is now of the utmost consequence that the English and Scots should be united, not only in a pohtical, but also in a rehgious alliance. Should this take place, as I hope and desire, it will be all well respecting Crito and Glycerium. And I wish that those may not prevent it, who neither wish well to them nor to ourselves. But these matters are as yet only in their infancy, and, so to speak, immature ; after a while we shall see all things more clearly. Pam- philus has not yet returned. He was appointed by Glycerium to accompany Crito. He sometimes writes to me when he has an opportunity, and hopes that things will turn out as we wish. What- ever may happen, Crito will occasion no delay. The Swede is expected with a numerous fleet ; he is a powerful [3 Bonner's first imprisonment was in September 1549, of which the reason was, because he did not publish in a sermon the king's authority during his minority, as he was commanded. Strype, Memor. ii. ii. 185.] [4 The capitulation took place July 5, 1560. For the terms, see Camden's Elizabeth, p. 42.] 106 BISHOP JEWEL TO V. WARTYK. [lET. prince, with plenty of money, and very liberal in regard to expense. But he resides a long way off, and all the seas are frozen over in the winter, so that he can neither come to us, nor get back again if he did. May God at length put such an end as we could wish to these disorders in France, and restrain the rage and wickedness of the Guises! By the blessing of God, all is now quiet among us, not only as regards rehgion, but also the state. The harvest is plen- teous, labourers only are wantmg. Yet, as the French are said to be arming a fleet, and threatening some mischief or other, lest any danger should arise unexpectedly, as is not improbable, we are raising levies in all quarters, and getting troops in readiness, in case we should require tlieu' services. For my own part, however, as times now are, I scarcely think they have sufficient leisure from their own affairs to attend to ours. You have now all our news. I desist from making any promises respecting my friend Juhus. Only let him come ; he knows the way hither, and he shall not want any thing that I can give him. But why do I bid him come by himself? Let him rather wait a little while, and come with you. Yet why should I bid him wait, when he ought to have come long since ? Farewell, my father, farewell. I shall one day, I hope, say to you face to face, " My father, how do you do?" Salute in my name that most excellent lady your wife, masters Bullinger, Gualter, Lavater, Frisius, Simler, Gesner, Haller, Wickius, Herman, (if he is still with you.) Julius, his wife, and the. little Martyr. We are all so scattered in this dispersion of the nations, that I cannot at all write for certain as to Avhat our brethren are doing. I doubt not however, but that they are piously occupied in the furtherance of the gospel, and that they are mindful of you and of all your friends. Again, my father, farewell, and pray God that he may make this our present light to be perpetual. Salisbury, June 1, 1560. Your most attached, John Jewel, Anglus. LII. N, GALLASIUS^ TO J. CALVIN. [B. 21.] London, June 30, 1560. I WAITED upon the bishop, by whom I was received very \} Nicolas dcs Gallars was recommended by Calvin to be minister to the French congregation in London, at the desu-e of Grindal, bishop of London, that he would send over some honest able person for that place. Strype, Lll.]] N. GALLASIUS TO J. CALVIN. 107 courteously. I presented to liim, ray father, your letter-, which he read in my presence with an open and cheerful countenance, and forthwith briefly related to me its contents ; expressing his thanks to you for having written to him in so friendly a manner, and also for reminding liim of his duty. He then accosted the elders who had accompanied me to his residence, to some of whom my arrival was by no means agreeable, and exhorted them not to be ungrateful to God and you, since they had obtained more than they had dared to hope for ; that they should follow my recommendations, and henceforth act in all circumstances by my advice, and shew them- selves friendly towards me, and admonish the whole church of their duty toAvards me. Then turning to me apart, he offered me his good offices, and that I might have familiar access to liim as often as I wished. I requested that all matters in our chm'ch might be determined by his authority, by wliich means our people would be more effectually kept to their duty ; and that he would be pleased to be present, or rather to preside, at the reading of your letter to them. He replied, that in this matter he resigned all his authority to myself, but that he would willingly attend, if he could be of any use. He afterwards added something about appointing as my col- league Peter Alexander, who was acceptable to the people, and had begun to gather a church before my arrival ; and who was the more acceptable, because he neither required any salary, nor was likely to become a burden to what is now a poor and necessitous church ; for he has a valuable prebend at Canterbury, the revenue of which he could easily receive during his absence under the plea of this appointment. I replied that I would farther deliberate and confer with him upon this matter, but that I would take no steps without consulting him^. [Nicolas Gallasius.] Cranmer, 594. The following extract, taken verbatim from tlie original document in the archives of Geneva, refers to this subject : " Apres le deces do la Royne Marie' d'Angleterre, et a Tadvenement de Elizabeth sa soem-, les persecutions y cesserent et y cut quelque liberie' pom- les Chrestiens. L'Eglise de Londres requist a Geneve ung ministre pour redresser I'estat nagueres ruync, et obtiut Nicolas dcs Gallars. Alors s'en departirent les Angloys de Geneve, ayans pris humble conge' de la Seigncurie, le 30 de May 1560, et presente ung livrc de leurs noms et de leurs enfans, pom- estre a tousjours retenus au debvoh- qu'ils avoient a la ville. Car les ungs avoient acquis le droict de bourgeoysie, ct tous ensemble se estoient honnestement portez. Les Ecossois aussi s'en allereut en leur pays, ou I'Evangile com- men90it aussi a ilorir." Chroniques do Reset, Liv. vr. Chap. 58.] [2 This letter is printed in Calvin's Epistles, p. 232. Ed. Genev. 1575.] [3 The above extract contains all that relates to England. There are at 108 T. LEVER TO H. BULLINGER. [lET. LIII. T. LEVER TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 35.] Coventry, July 10, I5G0. Much health in Christ Jesus. I have received two letters from your reverence, since my return to England ; and I have once written to you both concerning religion, and also something about myself; which letter of mine, I learn from your first letter, came safe to hand. In your last from Zurich of the 20th of March, (which however did not reach me in England until the 22nd of June,) you state that various and uncertain reports respecting our affairs are circulating amongst you, but that you are looking for more certain intelligence from ourselves. This then is a true and certain statement which I am now writing, as were also those other things which I wrote last year, both to yourself and the people of Berne ; namely, to masters John Haller, and Musculus. The true and sincere doctrine is freely preached throughout England, by those who are known to possess both ability and inchnation for this work, by commendatory letters from the queen, or one of the bishops, to authorise the admission of strange preachers into the churches. No discipline is as yet established by any public authority ; but the same order of public prayer, and of other ceremonies in the church, which existed under Edward the sixth, is now restored among us by the authority of the queen and parha- ment ; for such is the name of our great council. In the in- junctions, however, published by the queen, after the sitting of parliament, there are prescribed to the clergy some ornaments, such as the mass-priests formerly had and still retain. A great number of the clergy, all of whom had heretofore laid them aside, are now resuming similar habits, and wear them, as they say, for the sake of obedience'. There are indeed but few of us, who hold such Zurich several very long letters written by Gallasius, relating, however, principally to the dissensions caused by Alexander in the French church in London, and referring repeatedly to the interposition of the bishop on his behalf.] [1 The first bishops that were made, and who were but newly returned out of their exile, as Cox, Grindal, Horn, Sandys, Jewel, Parkhurst, Ben- tham, upon their first returns, before they entered upon their ministry, laboured all they could against i-eceiving into the church the papistical habits, and that all the ceremonies should be clean laid aside. But they could not obtain it from the queen and parliament, and the habits were enacted. Then they consulted together what to do, being in some doubt whether to enter into their functions. But they concluded unanimously not to desert their ministry for some rites, that, as they considered, were but a LIII.] T. LEVER TO H. BOLLINGER. 109 garments in the same abhorrence, as the soldier mentioned by Tertullian- did the crown. But Ave are not ignorant what occasion the papists will take from thence, as a cause of stumbling to the weak. For the prebendaries in the cathedrals, and the parish priests in the other churches, retaining the outward habits and in- ward feeling of popery, so fascinate the ears and eyes of the multitude, that they are unable to believe, but that either the popish doctrine is still retained, or at least that it will shortly be restored. Many of our parishes have no clergyman, and some dioceses are without a bishop. And out of that very small number who admi- nister the sacraments throughout this great country, there is hardly one in a hundred who is both able and willing to preach the word of God ; but all persons are obliged to read only what is prescribed in the books. Thus indeed is the Lord's harvest very abundant among us, but the labourers are very few. Those who were here- tofore bishops, with the other leading papists, preferring the supremacy of the pope to the authority of the queen, are deprived of all their honours and emoluments in England. Some^ of them also have been lately committed to custody and confinement, and it is not yet known what is to become of them. The gospel is received in Scotland, not indeed universally and by general consent, but yet with great zeal and sincerity by the greater part. And the Scots have now for a long time been trying to drive the French out of Scotland, so that we are making great preparations for war, and sending a great number of troops to their assistance. There is a harbour in Scotland, which in our laniruaffe is called Leith : this, fortified with ditches, ramparts, cannon and [other] arms, is in the possession of the French ; the English^ are besieging it. Numbers are slain on both sides, and, as it is said, no quarter is allowed. I have heard, what I suspect to be the case, that such now-a-days are the conditions of a peace among the few, and not evil in themselves, especially since the doctrine of the gospel i-emained pure and entire. Stiype, Annals, i. i. 263.] [2 In his treatise De Corona mil'Uis, (written upon occasion of a donative granted by the emperors Caracalla and Severus to the soldiers, about a.d. 209), in which he defends a soldier, who having refused to place upon his head a garland such as his fellow-soldiers wore, and being brought before the tribune, and asked the reason of his non-compliance, answered, he was a Christian, and therefore could not wear it, it being unlawful for a Christian thus to adopt a pagan custom.] [3 See above, p. 103, n. 3.] [1 Lord Grey of Wilton advanced to the attack on Leith, at the head of 6000 English foot, and 1200 horse. Camden's Elizabeth, p. 41.] 110 T. LEVER TO II. fiULLINGER. [lET. powers of the world, that if a single prisoner is kept alive by either party, they are altogether violated, but that whatever num- bers may be slain on either side, they remain in all their force. And this I gather from the circumstance, that as yet no war has been publicly declared between the French and English, but rather such a peace, as that there is free liberty of trade on both sides ; while in the mean time the troops of both nations are perishing in this miserable and hostile conflict in Scotland. If you wish for any tidings respecting myself, I would have you know, that immediately after my return to England, I travelled through a great part of it, for the sake of preaching the gospel. And there is a city in the middle of England, called Coventry, in which there have always been, since the revival of the gospel, great numbers zealous for evangelical truth ; so that in that last persecution under Mary, some were burnt ^ [at the stake], others went into banishment together with myself ; the remainder, long tossed about in great difficulty and distress, have at last, on the re- storation of pure rehgion, invited other preachers, and myself in particular, to proclaim the gospel to them at Coventry. After I had discovered, by the experience of some weeks, that vast num- bers in this place were in the habit of frequenting the public preaching of the gospel, I consented to their request, that I should settle my wife and family among them ; and thus, now for nearly a whole year, I have preached to them without any hindrance, and they have liberally maintained me and my family in this city. For we are not bound to each other, neither I to the townsmen, nor they to me, by any law or engagement, but only by free kindness and love. My wife has lately borne me a daughter, who is alive and well, together with three other little children, which she had brought me from her late husband. We therefore salute you and yours, and pray for you every happiness in Christ. For when I understood from your letter, that your wife, your cliildren and sons-in-law with their children, were Avell, it afforded me the same pleasure as if I had been by nature, as I am in affection, one of those your children, whom I pray God in Christ to bless to you, and make happy for ever. I hear with much satisfaction, that you have written against the sect of the anabaptists : and I do not wonder at your head-aches [1 Among whom were Robert Glover, and Cornelius Bungey, about Sept. 20, 1555. To these may be added John Careless, who died in prison, July 1, 155G. See Foxe, Acts and Moiuiments, Vol. vii. p. 398, &c. Ed. 1839.] LIU.] T. LEVER TO 11. BULLINGER. Ill becoming more painful and frequent with your advancing age ; but I grieve, when I think upon your years and labours, and pray God, that he may be pleased long to preserve you safe and sound to us and to his church. Many of us English, who lived together in the same house at Zurich, are now of necessity dispersed all over England, and at a great distance from each other. It is, however, impossible but that we shall all of us retain a grateful remembrance of that exceeding hospitahty and beneficence, which Zurich exhibited to us under your patronage, with so much comfort and benevolence and friendly regard. Although therefore I am writing alone and separate from the rest, I must entreat you to offer thanks in all our names, both to the magistrates of the commonwealth, the ministers of the church, and the other good people of Zurich, for the seasonable, agreeable, and so much needed hospitality there afforded to us exiles for the cause of Christ. And I beg you will salute from us in the Lord that good woman Elizabeth, who attended upon us. I entreat you likewise to be so kind as to salute in my name those most pious and learned persons, Peter Martyr, Bernardine Ochinus, E,. Gualter, Theodore Bibliander, your very dear sons-in-law, Lavater, Zuing- lius, and Simler ; and also John ab Ulmis, who formerly lived in England, and John Burcher, an Enghshman, with the other pious persons among you, known to me in the Lord. It would also be doing me a kindness, if sometime in your letters to the people of Berne^ or Arau'\ you would make mention of me with thanks. I have written, after my poor way, to the ministers and head school- masters of both churches, and will shortly write again, God willing. May he grant that we may always be mindful and ready upon all occasions to repay the debts we owe you in Christ ! Farewell. Coventry, July 10, 1560. Yours faithfully in Christ, Thomas Lever. [2 In a letter from Lever to the martyr Bradford, ho says, " I have seen the places, noted the doctrme and discipline, and talked with the learned men of Argentine, Basil, Zurich, Berne, Louvaine, and Geneva. Strype, Memorials, iii. i. 404.] p Ho had been minister of the English congregation at Aran. Strype, Annals, i. i. 153.] 112 BiSnOP JEWEL TO 1'. MARTYR. [lET. LIV. BISHOP JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. [A. 36.] SALISBURY, July 17, 15G0. Much health in Christ. I Avrote to you, if I remember right, not long since, on the first of June, respecting the general state of our affairs, as it then was, or at least was reported to be, at the time of writing. You shall now receive the intelhgence which is every where spread abroad among the people, and which has this day been sent to me from court. Matters are all settled respecting Scotland. The French gar- rison, having sustained from our troops a siege so long and tedious, as if they were only in sport, were at last compelled to surrender. Especial care was taken by our party, to avoid every thing that might have the appearance of undue severity, through the wanton- ness or rage of the soldiery ; so that, with the exception of those skirmishes which occasionally, as usual, took place on both sides, and which could not be without bloodshed, as little of human life was wasted as could have been expected. The French ' king, when he made overtures of peace, promised that he would in future relinquish those titles and armoriaP bear- ings of the kings of England, which he had heretofore assumed, together with his own, in right of his Scottish wife, the great ^ niece of Henry the eighth ; and that he would be content only with his lilies and ancestral titles. He engaged too, that the government of Scotland should be administered by twelve* commissioners, all Scotsmen ; and that in case there should arise any dispute about matters of religion or civil polity, the decision thereof should rest with the parliament of the whole kingdom : that only a hundred and twenty French soldiers should be left in all Scotland; and this, not as hostile to the government, but as evidences of the defeat and disgrace they had sustained, should any one hereafter venture to call it in question : that he would have them obey the directions of [1 Francis II. His plenipotentiaries were tlie bishop of Valence, and count Randau ; those of Elizabeth were Secretary Cecil and Dr Wotton.] [2 The debating of satisfaction for wrongs offered to queen Elizabeth, and about caution for the fifth article (respecting the title and arms of England and Ireland) was referred to another meeting to be holdcn at London ; and if then it could not be agreed, it was to be committed to the catholic king. 8ee Camden's Elizabeth, p. 43.] [3 Mary, queen of Scots, grand-daughter of Henry's sister Margaret, by James IV. of Scotland.] [•* The states Avere to name twenty four persons, of whom the queen of Scots should choose seven, and the states five. Ilumc.] LI v.] BISHOP JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. 113 the twelve commissioners, in whatever they should command. Both sides separated upon these conditions. The fortress of Leith was levelled to the ground by our troops ; the French were sent on board the fleet, to be taken home, sorrowful and dejected, and with scarcely the clothes on their backs. I doubt not, my father, but that all this intelligence has already reached you either by messen- gers, or report ; yet I doubt not likewise, but that my relation of these events, even now, will neither be unpleasant nor unacceptable to you. The Duke^ of Holstein has returned home after a magnificent reception by us, with splendid presents from the queen, having been elected into the order of the garter, and invested with its golden and jewelled badge. The Swede ^ is reported to be always coming, and even now to be on his journey, and on the eve of landing ; yet, as far as I can judge, he will not stir a foot. Every one here is talking about a peace, I know not upon what terms ; and that a general council is expected for settling the affairs of religion. For my own part I neither think that a peace will suit these times, nor that a council will ever come tog-ether. You have now, my father, received all the news we have at present. Farewell, and take care of yourself, that is of the half of my own soul. Salute the excellent lady your wife, masters Bullinger, Gualter, Simler, Lavater, Wolfius, Haller, Gesner, Frisius, Herman, JuUus, his wife, and the little Martyr. Sahsbury, July 17, 1560. Yours from my heart, John Jewel. [5 The duke was nephew to tho king of Denmark, who sent him to be a suitor to the queen, to obtain her for his wife. And this the rather to inter- cept the Swede, his neighboui-, endeavouring the same thing. Strj'pe, Annals, I. i. 296.] [G Eric XrV. son of Gustavus Vasa. About tho beginning of September, she [the queen] came to Windsor, and was there every hour in expectation of tho king of Sweden's coming ; being very shortly looked for at Westminster, where certain works were in hand, and the workmen wrought day and night to finish them against his reception. His business was to court the queen for his wife. But ho came not himself, being advised to tho contrary, yet his brother [John] the Duke [of Finland] did ; and was a passionate advocate for his brother with the queen. Strype, Annals, I. i. 368.] 114 BISHOP GRINDAL TO C. HUBERT, L^^"^* LV. BISHOP GRINDAL TO C. HUBERT. CB- 22.] London, Oct. 5, 1560. Greeting. I send you at last, most courteous Hubert, the promised account of the exhumation of Bucer and Fagius, which I have caused to be carefully drawn up by a certain learned man, who was a spectator of the whole tragedy. Many reasons have occasioned me to be thus late in performing my promise. They have arisen, partly, from my official engagements, which, in this restoration of evangehcal doctrine that, by the goodness of God, we have lately accomphshed tlirough the instrumentaHty of our most illustrious queen, have been numerous and important; and partly, from the opportunity embraced by the university of Cam- bridge^ of restoring the reputation, as they call it, of masters Bucer and Fagius by a public and solemn decree. For I was loth that there should go forth any testimony of my country's ingrati- tude and cruelty towards the remains of Bucer, (although it was oppressed at that time by the tyranny of the Romanists,) before the memorial of its gratitude and affection. You have therefore not only the account of the exhumation of Bucer, but also that of his restoration and in some measure his revival. I send you like- wise, by way of appendix, some writings of Bucer himself, which had hitherto lain unnoticed among the papers of the most reverend archbishop of Canterbury, and which he has given me for this purpose. Salute, I pray you, in my name your whole college, both of ministers and professors ; especially masters Marpach, John Stur- mius, Zanchius, Andernach, and Sebald. Commend to God in your prayers our churches, now again becoming imited in Christ their \} Archbishop Parker, Bishop Grindal, and Dr Haddon, by virtue of power committed to them by the queen, wrote letters to the Vice-Chancellor, Dr Andi'ew Pern, and the rest of the University of Cambridge, to restore Martin Bucer and Paul Fagius, deceased in that university, to their due honour. The said letters being read in the senate, it was asked, Placetne vobis ut gradus et honoris titulus, qiue olim Martino Bucero et P. Fagio publicis hujus academice suffragiis adempta erant, eisdem in integrum restituantur, et omnes actus contra eos aut eorum doctrinani rescindantur ? which they all agreed to. This was done July 22 ; and on the 30th Dr Acworth, the public orator, made an oration publicly in St Mary's in honour of these learned men; Avhich done, Dr James Pilkington preached from the 112th Psalm. See Pilkington's Works, Parker Society's Edition, p. 651, Strype, Parker, i. 170, Historia de obitu Bucci'i, &c. appended to Buceri Scripta Anglicana, Basil. 1577, p. 935, &c.] LV.] BISHOP GRINDAL TO C. HUBERT. 115 head. Both I myself, and all the rest of us, who were received there with so much kindness and hospitality during the time of our exile, pray for every blessing and happiness to the state of Stras- burgh, and are prepared to shew every manifestation of gratitude in our turn, if we can any way be of use to it. Salute likewise my very courteous host, master James Heldehn, the minister at Wasselheim, together with his most excellent wife. May the Lord preserve you all, and guide you by his Spirit ! Amen. Dated at London, Oct. 5, 1560. Your much attached in Christ, Edmund Grindal, Bishop of London. I have sent, for the most part, the originals themselves. Should there be any errors either in the arrangement or orthography, you will use your own judgment in correcting them. LVI. BISHOP JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. [^A. 38.] Salisbury, Nov. 6, 1560. Much health in Christ. What to write to you at this time, my father, I do not know. For I have very little news, and much less time for writing, as I am now preparing for the assembling my clergy, and the visitation of my diocese ; which will be a work of two months. I was on the point of writing to you, I know not what, about a month since ; indeed I had ah'eady begun my letter. But when a rumour was every where circulated about you, un- favourable to yourself, painful to us all, and to myself especially most distressing; and this too, not only confirmed by common report, but also by the letters of Grindal and the archbishop of Canterbury, I was, believe me, compelled through grief and anxiety of mind to leave off, and tear up what I had begun. Now, how- ever, since our brethren from Geneva, who have very lately returned among us, relate that all is with you as we desire, I cannot refrain from writing something to you, though in truth I have at this time nothing to write about. Our church, by the blessing of God, is at length in peace. And no wonder ; for those winds which heretofore stirred up the waves, are now admirably confined by iEolus, to prevent their doing any mischief. We are only wanting in preachers ; and of these there is a great and alarming scarcity. The schools also are entirely deserted ; so that, unless God look favourably upon us, we cannot hope for any supply in future. The existing preachers, who are 8—2 116 BISHOP JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. [lET. few in number, those especially who have any ability, are listened to by the people with favour and attention. We found at the be- ginning of the reign of Elizabeth a large and inauspicious crop of Arians, anabaptists, and other posts, which I know not how, but as mushrooms spring up in the night and in darkness, so these sprung up in that darkness and unhappy night of the Marian times. These, I am informed, and hope it is the fact, have retreated before the light of purer doctrine, like owls at the sight of the sun, and are now no where to be found ; or, at least, if any where, they are no lonffer troublesome to our churches. That volatile Ubiquitarian ' doctrine cannot by any means gain footing among; us, thouo-h there have not been wanting; from the first outset those who had the subject much at heart. In the French church, which they now have in London", I hear there are some unquiet and turbulent men, who are openly beginning to profess Arianism. May God at length remove these tares from us ! The queen ^, noAv that our affairs are settled, promises to give us a pure and undebased currency, and is therefore beginning to call in all the base coinage of the late times. There is no further news from Scotland, beyond what I acquainted you with in my last [1 The Ubiquitarian controversy was another plague, which our church was likewise fortunate enough to escape. The discussion was one whicli, naturally enough, grew out of the sacramental dispute ; for they who con- tended for the bodily and local presence of Clu-ist in the eucharist, — whether Romanists or Lutherans, — must also maintain that his body might be in many j^laces at the same instant ; and this assertion seems to imply, as a necessary consequence, that his body has the attribute of omnipresence, [or ubiquity, from whence the controversy derived its name.] Le Bas, Life of Jewel, p. 127. See also Moshcim, Ed. Soames, Vol. in. p. 379.] [2 In Threadncedle street, Avhich they had either borrowed or hired, be- longing to the dean and chapter of Windsor, and which they have to this day [1709] ; being part of St Anthony's hospital dissolved. Strype, Annals, i. i. 175. This church is now removed to Aldersgate.] [3 Francis Alcn, September 3, 15G0, writes to the Earl of Shrewsbmy, " There is like to be a calling downe of the base money, I understande, very shortlye ; and the queue's majestic hath sworne that the daye and tyme shall be kept secrete to herselfe, and that fewe besyds shall knowe. So as the very tyme, whensoever it chauncctli, will be so shorte and sodeyne, that men are like to have small wai-ninge of the matter." The persons who undertook and executed the gigantic task of reforming the debased coinage of England were Daniel Ulstat and Co. of Antwerp, as appears by a letter of theirs to Sir Thomas Gresham, dated at Antwerp, July 8, 1560. See Burgon's Life and Times of Sir Thomas Gi-esham, Vol. i. p. 354, &c. and Strype, Annals, i. i. 396, who gives a full account of this proceeding.] LVI.] BISHOP JEWEL TO P. MARTYFt. 117 letter, respecting the surrender of the garrison, and the settlement of affairs accorcUng to agreement. What Crito is doing, I know not. Pamphilus has not yet returned. As to Glycerium, I wish — , but these things are in the hand of God. May*, the dean of St Paul's, and intended for the archbishoprick of York, is dead. Dr Horn is to be the bishop of Winchester. Other matters are in the same state as when I last wrote. As for Parkhurst, Sandys, Sampson, Lever, and our other friends, we are so entirely scattered, — not for the dispersion, but, as I hope, for the gathering of na- tions, — that I now see almost as little of them as yourself. I hear that letters, and some other things have been brought over for me from Germany, but I know not whence, or from whom, though I suspect, from yourself; so that every thing will appear tedious to me, till I come to know what it is. As for myself, exceptmg that you are so far distant, I am in other respects very well. Farewell, my father, farewell, the better half of my heart. I would Avrite at tliis time to that most accomplished man, BulHnger, were I not prevented by business. He must forgive me for the present : I will hereafter write to him more at length, whatever it may be. Salute him, I pray you, most dutifully in my name, as also Gualter, Simler, Gesner, Haller, Wickius, Lavater, Zuinghus, Wolfius, Frisius, I dearly love them in the Lord, and all that belong to them. I am surprised that my friend Julius has neither Avritten to me, nor come to you. I desire his welfare just as much as if he were my own brother. If he doubts my friendship, let liim put it to the proof. To him likewise, and his wife, and first and foremost, or rather before all first and foremost, whether men or women, salute the excellent lady your wife, my little Martyr, and Herman. Again, my father, fiirewell. Salisbury, Nov. 6, 1560. Your most attached, John Jewel, Anglus, LVII. R. GUALTER TO LORD F. RUSSEL. [B. 23.] Zurich, March If!, 15G1. Grace and peace from God the Father through Jesus Christ. The letter, most illustrious prince, which your clemency wrote to me on the twenty-first of January^ last year, has been delivered [4 May died Aug. 8. Ho had been a counsellor to king Edward, one of his visitors, and one of those that sat iu the court of requests in his reign. Strypo, Annals, i. i. 306.] [5 See above. Letter XLI. p. 82.] 118 R. GUALTER TO LORD F. RUS3EL. [lET. into my hands. It was on many accounts exceedingly gratifying to me, both as affording a clear evidence of your truly pious and christian mind, and also as presenting such an account of the general state of religion among you, as could not but be most delightful to all who wish well to England in particular, and generally to the church at large. But although I have always felt desirous of replying to your letter, I have deferred doing so even to this day, because I considered it unbecoming in me to in- terrupt your clemency, occupied as you are in far more important engagements, with a letter of so little consequence. But now the bearer of this, John Henry Fabricius, gives me an opportunity of writing. He is of honourable extraction, and a youth of good disposition and of great promise. His father is a man of the highest authority in our republic, and the chief standard-bearer, as they call it. After having first provided for the care and instruction of his son at my house for three whole years, he sent him into France to carry on his literary pursuits in that country. After a short time he was placed at court by the king of Navarre, where, among other noble youths, he was at first in the service of the queen, and afterwards in that of the king himself; and at length, after the completion of the time that young men of that rank are usually employed, he was honourably dismissed. His father how- ever, thinking that on account of his son's age, it will be to his disadvantage to keep him at home, and knowing that the courts of the German princes are full of drunken and debauched characters, by intercourse with whom youths even of the best disposition are more likely to be corrupted than benefited, has determined, upon my advice, and especially upon that of master BuUinger, to send him to England, if he may by any possibility obtain a situation either with your clemency, or the queen's most serene majesty, or with any other godly nobleman. Ho has a fair knowledge of Latin, and has made greater progress both in speaking and writing French, than a native of Germany can easily expect. He has learned all the duties of a court life, and possesses such talent and activity, that we hope his services will neither be unpleasing nor unprofitable to any one who may think fit to receive him. We desire however most especially to commend him to your clemency, because we have great expectations from you, and are aware that you possess ex- tensive influence with the queen's majesty and the other nobility of the realm. And if your exceeding kindness will allow us to do so, we entreat you again and again to consider this excellent youth as commended to your good ofiices. For thus you will not only do a LVII.J R. GU ALTER TO LORD 1'. KUS8EL. 119 kindness to that most worthy man, his father, but will also bind to you, by no common obligation, the whole state of Zurich, in which, if he live, he will one day hold an important post. May God the Father of mercy guide your clemency by his Spirit, and evermore preserve and confirm you in the knowledge of his Son Jesus Christ ! Amen. Dated at Zurich, March 16, in the year of the incarnation of Christ, 1561. [RODOLPH GUALTER.] LVIII. R. MASTERS TO R. GUALTER. [B. 25.J Greenwich, June 16, 1561. Immediately after the coronation^ of our most illustrious queen I received your letter", most beloved Gualter, by the hands of our friend Parkhurst on his return to us from Zurich. I wrot© in reply not long after, but my letter was sent to Antwerp ; and, as I am given to understand after a year's interval, it was lost in the sea, and the bearer of it was drowned hkewise. I was not in truth so much grieved at the loss, as apprehensive that from my not having answered your letter after so long a silence between us, you would accuse me of having slighted your friendship ; as indeed you might have done with reason, had not this just ground of excuse acquitted me of the charge. Burcher increased my appre- hension, and Julius confirmed it, each of them coming over to us from Zurich without bringing me a letter. But do not, I pray you, my Gualter, entertain so unfavourable an opinion of me. For it has always been my nature so much to dread the charge of neglected friendsliip, that I would rather choose to run into the contrary extreme. Nor do I think there is any one who has just reason to complain of me in this particular. For why should I shght that which is acquired in an honourable way ? And I would rather embrace, and reverence, and all but superstitiously cultivate such a friendsliip as literary pursuits and moral integrity (wliich are the two closest bonds of friendship) produce, increase, and uninterruptedly preserve with persons like yourself, that is, with learned and worthy men. I pray you to consider that I am yours, and that you and every thing belonging to you are most dehghtful to me, and cherished as they ought to be. And this, should I be able to oblige you in any way, you shall find in fact to be the \} Queen Elizabeth was crowned Jan. 15, 1559.] [2 See above, Letter VII. p. 13.] 120 K. MASTERS TO R. GUALTER. [lET. case. For I am not different from what I used to be, when duruig my residence at Oxford I enjoyed your most delightful intimacy and agreeable conversation, what time true religion was at its lowest ebb. With respect to your letter, I most solemnly assure you, that it was shewn to our queen, that, taught by the misfortunes of others, she might perceive again and again what advice she might derive from it for the establishment of the true rehgion, and the avoiding of a mixed one ; and I took care that it should be shewn to those of our nobility whom I knew to be ready to promote what you piously recommended. But as I have a living epistle in Juhus, there is no occasion to tell you the result. I doubt not but that our gracious God will bring to a happy maturity what has been successfully begun ; and this let us entreat in our common prayers. Farewell, and be assured that there is no one who wishes you more abundant and greater blessings, and who, in short, loves and esteems you more heartily than Masters. Once more, and a thou- sand times, farewell. From the court at Greenwich near London, June 16, [1561.] Yours heartily as though I were your brother, Richard Masters. LIX. P. MARTYR TO A NOBLEMAN ^ IN ENGLAND. [B. 26.] Zurich, July 22, 1561. For very many and great causes, most noble prmce, I am exceedingly bound unto your highness. For you bear such regard towards me, a humble and obscure individual, whom you scarcely once saw in England, as that you have now entertained with singular courtesy and benevolence my attendant Julius, and have shewn him no ordinary, but very great kindness in the management of his business ; for which cause I am exceedingly thankful to your high- ness. And besides this, you have written me a letter : a letter, shall I say ? yea, rather praises and commendations both of my [1 This nobleman is supposed by Strypc to have been Thomas, duke of Norfolk, at the instigation of his tutor, John Foxe. This endeavour, he adds, of getting Martyr into England proceeded, no question, from an order made by the archbishop and bishops at Lambeth, where they sat by commission : which was, to raise a contribution out of their own revenues for learned strangers to be placed readers in the universities, both for their stipends, and for the defraying of thek expenses in their journey. Ann. i. i. 381.] UX.T p. MARTYR TO A NOBLEMAN IN ENGLAND. 121 learning and virtues, which although I do not acknowledge that I possess, yet I could not but rejoice in your good opinion, because I understood it as a most certain testimony of your love and good- will towards me ; nor can I consider myself as being loved by you for any other reason, than for the sake of godhness and religion. I forbear to mention the singular desire that you manifest for my return to England, and which you af&rm to be shared by pious and learned men in common with yourself. But how great a favour is it, that you have suggested to the queen's majesty the expediency of my recall, and have interested her in my favour ! In fine, you have promised to afford me every kindness and comfort in your power, and have expressed the reasons, and those very honourable to you, of this your regard, namely, the love of your country, and exceeding anxiety for the advancement of God's word. Who can help loving such a prince ? Indeed I should be devoid of godli- ness, not to say of common courtesy, should I ever forget so much good-will and so many benefits. I will therefore endeavour, and this by every means in my power, that they may never escape my memory. But now as touching my return to England, although I am unable to answer as I could earnestly desire, do you, most noble prince, with your usual kindness, take in good part what I write in reply. First of all, I would not have you think that 1 have any thing more at heart, than the sohd and firm well-being of England in the Lord. Wherefore I could desire even now, no less than 1 did in times past, to promote the interests and edification thereof, and to do what would be both acceptable and profitable to your kingdom and church. But at this present time, such is the situa- tion in which I am placed, that I am engaged to the state and church at Zurich, and am not therefore my own master. I have therefore inquired the opinion and inchnation as well of the magis- trates, as of my fellow-ministers upon this matter. And indeed I found in them a singular zeal and most ready mind to satisfy your desire. For you must not think any thing more acceptable to, or desired by them, than that the truth of the gospel may be spread abroad as far as possible. But on the other hand, they no less prudently than lovingly take into consideration my constitution, state, and age ; and are somewhat apprehensive least, burdened as I am and in some measure broken with age, I should be unable to bear the fatigue of the journey, which is rather long, variable, and not every where without difticulty. They see moreover that no small danger is to be apprehended in different places on the route ; ] 22 p. MARTYR TO A NOBLEMAN IN ENGLAND. [lET. and tliey consider too, that I am called forth to much more severe labours than I undergo m this place. Wherefore they think it very- likely that I shall be unable to serve either them or you ; and are therefore of opinion that it is much better for me to remain here, where by teaching, writing, and publishing my commentaries, I may bo of use both to them and you, and others, according to my ability. But in this double kind of answer, the first part seems to me to have the nearest approach to the truth ; for I am myself also afraid of being unable to endure the journey and labours. But in the other part I thuik that they are themselves mistaken, who judge that I can be of so much use by remaining quiet in this country ; for they make much more account of my lucubrations than they deserve. Aware as I am of the little pretensions I have to learning, I agree with them to remain here solely on account of the first reason assigned. For I am easily led to believe that I shall be so liable to be weakened and broken up by the labours of the journey, as to be rendered altogether unprofitable. Wherefore I entreat your highness first of all, and next those godly and learned men, to accept of my good-will in a case where, by reason of my infirmity, they cannot obtain the object itself that they desire to be accomplished. For necessity is a hard weapon, the striving against which seems to be nothing less than tempting God. But I would have you, right honourable prince, remember in the mean time, tliat in whatever part of the world I may be placed, I shall ever be most beholden to your highness. And I entreat you in my turn, not only to retain your love to your country and zeal for the advancement of rehgion, but to endeavour daily more and more to increase the same in your christian heart ; whereby the wings of the gospel of the Son of God, which were formerly cut short, may grow again, and so grow, that it may swiftly and with abundant fruit pervade all your provinces, cities, and towns. As- ' suredly, if you shall contuaue to be inflamed with this double care, according as you have begun, both almighty God will approve you, and all discreet and godly men will honour you as a worthy citizen and a profitable prince. May God long preserve you in health and happiness through Christ ! Given at Zurich, July 22, 1561. Peter JVIartyr. LX.] BISHOP JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. 123 LX. BISHOP JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. [A. 43.] Salisbury, Feb. 7, 1562. Much health in Christ. Your letter, my father, was most gratifying, not only as coming from you, from whom every thing ought to be, and is, most agreeable ; but also, as most lucidly de- scribing the revival of religion in France ; and because, when I read it, and perceived you were so near^ I fancied that I heard you yet nearer to me, and that I was enjoying your conversation. For though the affairs of France were made known to us by report, as usual, and by the couriers, yet the information seemed both more certain and far more agreeable, when communicated by your- self, and more especially, as I knew you to have much to do with them. As to what you write, that those at the head of affairs are altogether desirous of some alteration of rehgion, not so much from a zeal and love of godliness, as from a conviction of the ridiculous absurdities of the papists, and that the people can be kept to their duty in no other way ; whatever may be the principle, and what- ever the reason of the change, only let Christ be preached, whether in pretence or in truth, and I therein do rejoice, yea, and ivill rejoice. That disputation of yours, however, has of necessity much advanced the gospel, and discomfited the adversaries. But as to your statement, that a kind of interim and farrago of rehgion is aimed at by some parties, may God prevent it ! I know that all changes of importance in the state are offensive and disagreeable, and that many things are often tolerated by sovereigns by reason of the times. And this at first, probably, was not attended with inconvenience ; but now that the full hght of the gospel has shone forth, the very vestiges of error must, as far as possible, be re- moved, together with the rubbish, and, as the saying is, with the \} In a letter from Peter Martyr to bishop Parkhurst, dated August 23, 1561, he writes, " I am called into France to deal in conference as touching- religion ; safe conduct is brought hither in the name of the king and of the queen mother, both subscribed and sealed. And thr-ough the letters of the king of Navarre, I am called with great entreaty, so as it hardly seems that my journey can be deferred. And seeing the matter is great and full of danger, I heartily desire your lordship that you will commend the same and myself earnestly in your prayers to God." Martyr remained in France dm-ing the conferences at Poissy, between the papists and the French protestants, and returned to Zurich on Nov. 21. See his coiTespondence, Lett. 49 — Gl, and also Thuanus, ii. 117 — 126, and Spon. i. 307—309, for a full account of the proceedings of the conference above referred to.] 124 BISUOP JEWEL TO P. MARTYK. [lET. very dust. And I wish we could effect this in respect to that linen surplice : for as to matters of doctrine, we have pared every thing away to the very quick, and do not differ from your doctrine by a nail's breadth ; for as to the Ubiquitarian theory there is no danger in this country. Opinions of that kind can only gain ad- mittance where the stones have sense. Must I tell you that I thank you for your Orothetes^? I doubt not but that the indi- vidual you mention, if he is wise, will think himself much indebted to you. He will perhaps, however, summon courage, and defend liis Pantachus, and prepare himself for a reply, and make his ex- ceptions both against yourself and your Palmmon. I disclaim the praise which you so bountifully bestow upon me, as 1 am aware that it rather belongs to yourself, and to yourself alone. Yet it is sweet, my father, as the saying ']&, to receive praise from one who is himself commended. Your commendation was not so much an evidence of your judgment, as of your love ; and, although I cannot deserve it in other respects, I certainly shall by my affec- tion for you. The Marian bishops are still confined in the tower, and are going on in their old way. If the laws were but as rigorous now as in the time of Henry, they would submit themselves without difficulty. They are an obstinate and untamed set of men, but are nevertheless subdued by terror and the sword. We have lately published an apology" for the change of re- ligion among us, and our departure from the church of Rome. I send you the book, though it is hardly worth sending to such a [1 Peter Martyr had composed a dialogue upon this [the Ubiquitarian] question; in which he introduced Jewel, under the name of Palcamon^ as moderator between two disputants; the one, an Ubiquitarian, under the name of Pantachus ; the other, an orthodox thinker, relative to the circum- scription of Christ's himianity, under the name of Orothetes. Pantachus may signify an Ubiquitarian, from Travraxov, every ivhere; Orothetes, (opoderqs) in Hke manner, implies a settler of boundaries ; in other words, an advocate for the doctrine that the human body of Christ is circumscribed within limits. Le Bas, Life of Jewel, pp. 127, 128. See Peter Martyr's Epistles, Lett. 49.] [2 This was the celebrated Apologia Ecclesioi Anglkance, a work recom- mended to bishop Jewel by the archbishop (Parker) and his colleagues, to vindicate the church of England before all the world, for her departure from the bishoi) of Rome, and for her rejection of his pretended authority, and for what was done in reforming religion. See Strype, Annals, i. i. 424, and Parker, i. 197, where is preserved a congratulatory letter from Peter Martyr to Jewel on the occasion of this work.] LX.] BISHOP JEWEL TO P. MAPtTYR. 125 distance. It is faulty in many places, as is almost every thing that is printed in this country : such is the negligence of our printers. Our queen has fully made up her mind not to send any repre- sentative to the council, as to the existence or locality of Avhich we are totally ignorant : certainly, if it is held any where, or has any being at all, it must be very secret and obscure. We are now think- ing about pubhshing^ the reasons which have induced us to decline attendance. I am fully persuaded, for my part, that no effectual progress can be made at the present time by these assemblies and discussions ; and that God will not employ such means for the propagation of the gospel. The queen, to our great sorrow, still remains unmarried, nor is it yet known what is her intention. I think however, you have long since been aware of my suspicions on the subject. The Swede, a most constant and assiduous suitor, has very lately been dis- missed ; and now he has received his refusal, threatens, as I hear, to look towards Scotland ; that since he cannot settle among us, he may at least establish himself in our neighbourhood. There is a certain noble lady, the lady Margaret \ a niece of Henry the eighth, and one who is beyond measure hostile to re- ligion, more violent indeed, than even queen Mary herself. The crown, it is surmised, will descend to her son^ a young man of about eighteen, should anything unhappily happen to Elizabeth, which God forbid ! The husband of this woman, the Scottish Len- nox, has within these few days been committed to the tower. The son they say is either carried away by his mother, or has taken refuge in Scotland. There are, as is usually the case, various reports respecting him. The queen" of Scotland is, as you know, unmarried, so that a matrimonial alliance may possibly be formed between them. However this be, it is behoved that the papists are planning some scheme or other, and expecting something, I know not what, no less than the Jews do their Messiah. [3 This design Jewel afterwards accomplished in the foi'm of a letter to a Venetian gentleman by the name of Scipio, with whom he had become acquainted at Padua.] [4 Margaret Douglas, daughter of Margaret, sister of Henry the eighth, by Douglas, Earl of Angus, her second husband.] [5 Lord Darnley, her son by Matthew Stuart, earl of Lennox, descended from Robert Stuart, the next successor to Robert Bruce, king of Scotland. He was afterwards the unhappy husband of Mary, queen of Scots.] [c Mary, queen of Scots, then the widow of Francis the second, of France, who died in 1560.] 126 BISHOP JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. [lET. The pope's nuncio * is still loitering in Flanders ; for he cannot yet obtain a safe-conduct to come over to England. The bishop of Aquila", Pliihp's ambassador, a clever and crafty old fox, and formed for intrigue, is exerting himself in his behalf as much as he can ; at least, that he may have an audience, that he may not have come so far to no purpose : for he hopes that somethmg, I know not what, may be effected at a single conference. There is a noble young lady, the lady Catharine^, daughter of the duke of Suffolk, of the blood royal, and as such expressly mentioned in his will by Henry the eighth, as fourth in succession in case any thing should occur. The earl of Hertford, son of the duke of Somerset, has a son by her, born, as many think, out of wedlock, but as the parties themselves declare, in lawful marriage ; for that they made a private contract between themselves, and were married by a Romish priest in the presence of a few witnesses. This affair has much disturbed the minds of many persons ; for if this marriage is a legal one, the son noAv born will be brought up with the hope of succeeding to the crown. how wretched are we, who cannot tell under what sovereign we are to live ! God will, I trust, long preserve Elizabeth to us in life and safety, and that will satisfy us. Do you, my father, pray God for the pre- servation of our church and state. Farewell, my father, farewell, my pride. Salute in my name your wife, masters BulHnger, Gualter, Lavater, Zuinglius, Haller, Wickius, Gesner, Frisius, and Wolfius, together with Juhus, his [1 The abbot of Martinengo. Strype, Annals, i. i. 1G6.] [2 This bishop instigated the conspiracy of Ai-thui' Pole and others against queen EUzabeth in 1562. Strype, Annals, i. i. 557.] [3 Younger sister to the Lady Jane Grey, and grand-daughter of Mary, sister of Henry the eighth. She had been married to Lord Herbert, son of the earl of Pembroke ; but having been divorced from that nobleman, sho made a private marriage with the earl of Hertford, son of the Protector. Elizabeth committed them both to the tower, where he lay nine years, till the death of his wife, by fi-eeing Elizabeth from all fears, procm'ed him his libei'ty. Their imprisonment was probably lengthened by a book written by John Hales about this time, which favom-ed the Lady Catharine's suc- cession to the throne. Her life was apparently shortened by her imprison- ment. The marriage was not established till 1606, when, the priest being produced, and other circumstances agreeing, a jury at common law found it a good marriage. See some very interesting letters on this subject in Ellis's Original Letters illustrative of English History. Second series, Vol. ii. p. 272—290.] LX.] BISHOP JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. 127 wife, and mf little Martyr. Salisbury, Feb. 7, 1562. From England. Your most attached, John Jewel, Anglus. P. S. Queen Elizabeth has restored all our gold and silver coinage to its fornaer value, and rendered it pure and unalloyed ; a truly royal act, and which you would wonder could have been effected in so short a time. LXI. BISHOP JEWEL TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 44.] Salisbury, Feb. 9, 1562. Much health. Scarcely any thing, most illustrious and esteemed master in Christ, now remains for me to write to you about. For I have carefully detailed all matters necessary to mention, and which occurred to me as I was writing, in my letter to Peter Martyr. My regard, however, and affection for yourself will not allow me to leave you unremembered, that you may at least know that I am still alive, and that I still retain a grateful recollection of the many and great favours I have received from you. As for Parkhurst, Sandys, Lever, Aylmer, and Samson, we have not seen each other these two years. I doubt not, however, but that they all entertain the regard they ought to do, both towards yourself, your family, and friends. We have no news from Scotland, except that religion is most favourably received, firmly maintained, and daily making progress in that country. They say, however, that the queen ^ of Scots still retains her mass. God will, I trust, some time open her eyes : for in other respects she is, it is said, not badly disposed. I wish she would entirely lay aside her high spirit and Lorrain feelings. With us all things are quiet. Some few of the bishops, who [4 When the queen attempted to celebrate mass in her own chapel of Holyrood-house, a violent mob assembled, and it was with the utmost diffi- culty that the Lord James Stuart and some other persons of high distinction could appease the tumult. Randolph wrote to Cecil, Sept. 12, 1561. "Her mass is terrible in all men's eyes. The erle of Cassilis said unto myself that he wolde never here any moe. I know not yet what mischief it may worke." Mary attempted to allay these ferments by promising to take the advice of the states in religious matters ; and in the mean time, to punish with death any alteration of the religion which she found generally established on her arrival in Scotland, which took place on Aug. 19, 1561.] 128 BISHOP JEWEL TO H. BULLINGER. [lET. were furious in the late Marian times, cannot as yet in so short a time for very shame return to their senses. They are therefore confined in the tower, lest their contagion should infect others. The pope both in pubhc and private is plotting mischief to the utmost of his power. Fourteen months since he sent a nuncio to queen EHzabeth. But as he cannot yet be admitted into England,' he is still loitering in Flanders. They still hope that something may be done ; for that all their roots of folly are not yet plucked up, and there are still remaining some persons whom they doubt not to belong to their party. But why do I tell you of these things, which, as I said just now, I have more fully related to Peter? Since our friend Juhus left England, I have not once seen that young townsman of yours, master John Schneider ; nor is it to be wondered at, as we are so far distant from each other. I heard however, some months since, that he was very comfortably situated; but should he stand in need of any thing, and I become acquainted with his plans, I will take care that nothing shall be wanting to him on my part : for I owe this, both to your kindness, and to the state of Zurich ; and I acknowledge the debt. I am rather surprised that our friend Bui^cher has not arrived here before this time ; for he wrote me word that he was coming, and from his letter he appeared to be already on the road. I take a great interest in him, and thank you in liis name. May God preserve you all, and especially thee, my father, and your church and commonwealth ; and should there be any who wish you evil, may he grant him a short life and little ability for mischief. I would write more, if more subjects occurred to me worthy of being recorded at such a distance. Salute that excellent woman your wife, masters Gualter, Josiali Simler, Lavater, ZuingUus, Hallcr, Gesner, Wolfius, Wickius, Fri- sius, Henry BuUinger your son, that excellent youth. Though none of our friends are with me, yet I hesitate not to greet you in the name of all ; for I know that they regard you with the respectful deference they ought. Farewell, my father, and most esteemed master ; and if I either am any thing, or have any power, think it all your own. Sahsbury, Feb. 9, 1562. Your most devoted, John Jewel, Anglus. LXII.] BISHOP JEWEL TO J. SIMLER. 129 LXII. BISHOP JEWEL TO J. SIMLER. [A. 45.] Salisbury, Feb. 10, 15G2. Much health in Christ. AVhat, my Josiah, shall I now write to you ? For I have already detailed all the news that has occur- red, and some, possibly, that has not occurred, in the letters which I wrote to Bullinger and to Peter Martyr. But a repetition of the same dish is, you know, fatal : and it would be impertinent to write about things now become antiquated and obsolete. Shall I then (say you) hear nothing from you ? Has John then nothing to write to Josiah ? Jewel to Simler ? A dear friend to a dear friend ? I will certainly write, were it only that you should know that I am still alive, and that I bear you and all yours constantly before my eyes ; and that no intervals either of time or place can ever remove from my mind those most agreeable recollections of Josiah \Josietatis tuce]. As for your thanking me with respect to our friend Julius, I must thank you, in my turn, for his own sake. I indeed desire, and Avish well to my JuUus, and profess myself ready to afford him any assistance, as far as my slender means will allow. And I must candidly acknowledge this to be his due, both on his own account, and more especially for the sake of Peter [Martyr]. As for yourself, my very dear Josiah, and how greatly I am indebted for all your kindness to me, I shall say nothing. This only would I have you know, that from the time I first became acquainted with you, I ever have been, am, and shall be yours. Farewell, my very dear and best friend, farewell. Salute your wife, and her sisters and mother, Bullinger, Gualter, Lavater, Wolfius, Zuinglius, Ilaller, AVickius, Frisius. Again, my Josiah, farewell. Salisbury, Feb. 10, 15G2. Yom's in the Lord, John Jewel, Anglus. LXIII. R. MASTERS TO R. GUALTER. [B. 28] London, Feb. 22, 1502. Health in the Lord always. Before I received your letter, most learned Gualter, written in favour of that excellent young man Henry Fabricius, what services I offered him on his first arrival in this country, both for your sake and that of your friends, 1 will not now relate, but he will tell you in person on his return : nevertheless, to confess the truth, I did not then under- stand that you felt any greater interest on his behalf, than you 9 ISO R. MASTERS TO R. GUALTER. FlET. would for any other inhabitant of Zurich. But as soon as I per- ceived by your letter how dear he was to you, I again called upon him with all diligence, and made every inquiry which I thought might be of use to him ; and encouraged liim as earnestly as I could to let me know if there were any thing of which he stood in need, and in which I could oblige him : and I promised not to be wanting to him in any respect, so that he might have at his service even my own house, or whatever else I had it in my power to offer. But he declined all my services, being a youth of extreme modesty, and declared that he was not in want of any tiling. I then began to inquire into the reason of his not residing with the earl of Bed- ford. He tells me that his lordship had placed liim with master KnoUes, the vice-chamberlain, a truly pious man and one of her majesty's privy council, with a view to his becoming better ac- quainted with the Enghsh court, and especially with that part of the country which our queen at that time determined to visit, in a progress ^ of some length, attended by a great retinue of the nobility ; the earl himself, meanwhile, residing at his country house, that he might take care of his health, and not suffer it to be endangered, by reason of his corpulence, by so long a journey in the heat of summer. Immediately after this progress was completed, I happily re- ceived your letter, from which I took occasion to wait upon the earl respecting the condition of our friend Fabricius. He gave me the same statement as Fabricius had done before ; and told me moreover, that he had given him a horse which cost twenty crowns, and also twenty shillings of our money to defray the expenses of that journey. He added too, that he had good reasons for placing Fabricius with master Knolles, as he knew that he had come hither after leaving France, for the especial object of making him- self acquainted with the court and the manners of our people, and our cities ; and that on the approach of winter he would receive him into his own household till the beginning of spring, at which time, [1 The queen set out on the 14th of July on a progress into Essex and Suffolk, by way of Wanstoad, Havering, Pyrgo, Now Hall, Colchester, St Osyth's, Harwich, Ipswich, and so back by Smalbridge, Gosfield, Standon, Hertford, and Enfield. She arrived at St James's on the 22nd September. It Avas in this excursion that the queen took offence at the slovenly manner in which the church sei"vice was performed, and shewed a feeling of dislike to the marriage of the clergy, which gave rise to an order against all resort of women to the lodgings of cathedrals and colleges. See Nares' Burghloy, ii. 240, 241; Wright's Q. EHzabeth, i. 67; Strype, Ann. i. i. 405, and Parker, i. 212.] LXIII.j R. MASTERS TO R. GUALTER. 131 he said, I have determined to send him back to his friends, as there is no hope of placing him in any honourable situation in the queen's service. Abel however, as far as I can gather from Fabricius, has written to his friends at Zurich absolutely and without any limitations, that the earl would receive him into his constant service ; whereas the earl, in his conversation with me, had fixed a time for his return to Zurich, at the beginning of spring, and had no intention whatever of retaining him in his family longer than until the end of the winter. Abel has made Fabricius very uneasy, lest his father should imagine from that letter, that some fault was to be found with Fabricius, because the earl would not retain liim longer than till the beginning of spring. But believe me, there is no blame whatever to be attached to the young man, but rather to Abel's creduhty, who interpreted to you by letter the words of the earl differently to what he really said. Fabricius, like a good and pious son, fearing nothing upon earth more than the anger of his father, who is in other respects most affectionate towards him, has entreated me to explain to you the bare and simple truth, which I solemnly declare I do. Thus much for Fabricius. As to myself, my excellent Gualter, it will be far more easy for you to conceive than for me to express my obligations to you, both for those very learned discourses you sent me, as also for your very friendly letter. I thank you exceedingly for both, as I ought to do. Abel will give you from me in return, as some token of my love to you, a yard and half of our English cloth, well adapted for hose, and which I entreat you again and again to take in good part. Fabricius I know Avill give you, better than I can, all the news respecting the Scots and French. God grant that all of us, who bear the name of Christ, may embrace salvation in him by constant faith, and live a life consistent with such profession. Again salute from me master Bullinger, who first begat me again unto Christ, and by his assist- ance made me to rehnquish popery. Farewell. London, Feb. 22, 1562. Your most devoted, Richard Masters. LXIV. R. ASCHAM TO J. STURMIUS. [B. 30.] London, April 11, 1562. Greeting. What docs this mean, my Sturmius? That IVIichael Toxites our common friend, and so much wished for mes- * 9 — 2 132 K. ASCHAM TO J. STURMIUS. [ LET. senger, should come hither from your parts without a letter from you to me ? Is Cook, or Hales, or any other Englishman what- ever, cither more attached to you, or more greedy of your letters than I am ? But I hear you exclaim on the other hand, Alas ! my Ascham, can you expostulate with mc for my not writing, who have not sent me a single syllable these three years ? And indeed, my very dear friend, you speak the truth ; and all this expostula- tion of mine is not to find ftiult with, or to rebuke you, but altogether an artifice, and got up by me on purpose. For I was afraid of your being beforehand with me, as you justly might have been, in complaining of our mutual silence. But let this pass. I will now, my Sturmius, write to you truly and openly. This long interruption of our correspondence has not arisen from inclination on my part, or forgetfulness of you, or neglect of my duty. I have not remained so long without writing to you either from want of matter to write about, or of opportunity of sending a letter ; but when you hear from me the true cause of my silence, I shall not excite your anger and displeasure against me, but your grief and sorrow for me, whom I know you love. For these last four years I have been so attacked by continual fevers, that one scarcely ever left me without another immediately following in its place. And thus my whole state of health is so broken up and destroyed by these fevers Hnked and connected with each other, that a hectic has now seized my entire frame. The physicians promise me relief some time or other, but give me no hopes of an entire recovery. And now those who are my true friends, and among them my very assured friend John Hales, are frequently chirping to me that mournful announcement of Thetis to her son in Homer •: "Your life will indeed be short, and of no long continuance." And though we read that the most eminent men have died the soonest, what is that to me, who am a man not of a lofty but a humble spirit ? I entirely repudiate that kind of consolation, whether from the poet or the historian. But when I betake myself to our teacher of true and complete salvation, who declares, that so much as is taken from the outward man is added to the inward man^, I do not give myself up to lamentation, but anticipate the new joys of a new life. But more of tliis at another opportunity ; for I desire at this time to begin a long discourse with you, though indeed I have at pre- sent very little leisure to accomphsh it, as our most serene queen is at this time so much employing me and all my time in writing so many letters. [1 See Horn. U. i. 41G.J [2 Sco 2 Cor. iv. IG.] LXIV.] R. ASCHAM TO J. STURMIUS. 133 Your last letter to me was dated Jan 15, 1560 ; the two heads of which, one concerning the Scots"' business, the other concerning the queen^s marriage, induced me to give it to the queen herself to read ; in both of which she discreetly noticed and graciously ac- knowledged and commended your singular respect towards herself. She exceedingly approved your judgment respecting the then exist- ing state of affairs in Scotland, and even now she greatly values you for your solicitude about us and our affairs. The passage concerning her marriage, I well remember, she read over three times, with an occasional sweet smile, and a very modest and bash- ful silence. Respecting her marriage, my very dear John Sturmius, I have neither any thing certain to write myself, nor does any one else among us, I am sure, know what to think about it. It was not for nothing, my Sturmius, but after due consideration, that in that first long letter of mine to you I stated, that in her whole manner of life she more resembled Hippolyte than Phasdra. Which obser- vation I then referred, not to the graces of her person, but wholly to the chastity of her mind : for of her own nature, without the advice of any one, she is so entirely averse and abstinent from marriage. When I know any thing for certain, I will write you word by the first opportunity : meanwhile I can give you no hopes as far as the king of Sweden is concerned. I wish you would sometimes write to master Cecil : for he is both most sound in religion, and most discreet in the government of the state ; and indeed, next to God and the queen, the most firm support of both. He is also very fond of learning and learned men, and is himself well skilled in both Latin and Greek. You wish, I know, to hear from me respecting our affairs. But I have nothing that I consider better worth writing about than the queen herself. I will therefore briefly describe what great and important matters, since she has taken the helm of government, she has planned with wisdom, and accomplished with success. First of all, she dedicated her earliest endeavours to God, by nobly purifying the rehgion which she found miserably polluted ; in the accompUsli- ment of which objects she exercised such moderation, that the papists themselves have no complaint to make of having been severely dealt with. This peace cstabhshed with God was followed by a peace with all the neighbouring sovereigns : and yet, on her acces- sion to the throne she found this kingdom involved in a double war, with the Scots and the French. Next, she so firmly and prudently withstood the Guises in Scotland, who were plotting marvellous things against us, that there now exists between both kingdoms. 134) K. ASCHAM TO J. STURMIUS. [lET. and both sovereigns, as secure a peace and firm an alliance, as can possibly take place between two most quiet neighbourhoods or most united sisters. After religion, in the first place, and the state next, had been restored to so desirable a tranquilhty, she applied her mind to the proper settlement of other internal improvements of the realm. All the coin that had been debased, and entirely alloyed with copper, she has restored to the pure silver standard^ ; an arduous and royal task, which neither Edward nor even Henry liimself ever ventured to undertake. She has furnished her armoury with such exquisite materials, that no sovereign in Europe, I am sm^e, can shew its equal. Her navy too she has so embellished and provided with every necessary, both as regards the abundance of stores and the ability of the sailors, that the resources of a wealthy kingdom might seem to have been expended upon this sole object. These things are of a pubUc nature, and relate to the whole realm. Let us now inspect her personal character and pursuits. She is readily forgetful of private injury, but is a severe assertor of public justice. She does not excuse crime in any one ; she leaves no one the hope of impunity ; she cuts off from every one the liberty of offending. She, least of all princes, covets the property and wealth of her subjects, and requires her own revenues to be expended sparingly and economically upon every private pleasure, but royally and hberally either for any object of public convenience, or for the splendour of domestic magnificence. But the glory she derives from herself, and the adornments of talent and learning that she possesses, I have described to you in another letter. I will now only state in addition, that neither at court, nor in the univer- sities, nor among our heads in church or state, are there four of our countrymen who understand Greek better than the queen her- self. When she is reading Demosthenes or J^^schines, I am very often astonished at seeing her so ably understand, I do not mean, the force of the words, the structure of the sentences, the propriety of the language, the ornaments of oratory, and the harmonious and elegant bearing of the whole discourse ; but also, what is of more importance, the feeling and spirit of the speaker, the struggle of the whole debate, the decrees and inclinations of the people, the manners and institutions of every state, and all other matters of this kind. All her own subjects, and very many foreigners, are witnesses to her proficiency m other languages. I was one day present, when she rephed at the same time to three ambassadors, the Imperial, [1 See above. Letter LVI. p. IIG. note 3.] LXIV.] K. ASCHAM TO J. STURMIUS. 135 French, and Swedish, in three languages ; Italian to the one, French to the other, Latin to the third ; easily, without hesitation, clearly, and without being confused, to the various subjects thrown out, as is usual, in their discourse. That you may yourself see how elegantly she writes, I send you inclosed in this letter a slip of paper, in which you have the word " quemadmodum" written in the queen's own hand. The upper one is mine, the lower the queen's. Let me know m your next letter whether the sight is pleasant to you, and the present an acceptable one. And thus much respecting our most noble queen, who is, besides all this, my most munificent mistress, and also very partial to John Sturmius. And should you ever happen to come to England, you will, I think, hear from her own mouth that Roger Ascham has not been a forgetful friend to John Sturmius in the presence of so great a sovereign. This account of our most excellent queen you will, I believe, read, and I assuredly write it, with the greatest satisfaction to us both. If she would only marry, she would leave no room for higher commendation ; and I wish, my Sturmius, that you would call forth all that power which you have derived from the best sources both of wisdom and eloquence, whether of reasoning from Demosthenes, or of diction from Cicero, to persuade her to this step. No cause more honourable can be undertaken by you than this, nor can any greater power of persuasion be desired by me, than that wliich you possess. We desire her to make choice of whomsoever she pleases ; we do not wish other persons to point out any individual for her acceptance, and we are all of us in favour of one of our own countrymen in preference to a stranger. I would have you know these things, in case you should ever feel disposed to consider the subject : for should she but add this single benefit to the number of those she has already conferred upon this country, and which I have just now mentioned, no nation can be more happy than ours. And thus much upon this subject. I will write to you about our other affairs at another time ; I now come, my Sturmius, to yourself. I was glad to learn from your letter, written a year ago to John Hales, that yom* [commentary on] Aristotle's Rhetoric'^ was [2 The following extract from an English letter of Ascham's to two of the Fellows of St John's in Nov. 1551, will tlu'ow light upon this passage. " Sturmius goeth forward in Rhetor. Arlstot. The first book is sent to Mr Cheke, which was pui-posed to me, but I had rather it should be sent to him. Mr John Hales, my singular friend, sent me a piece of this Rhetoric this week. I never saw any thing more to be compared with antiquity, and so I 136 R. ASCII AM TO J. STURMIUS. [lET. finished ; and I was -wonderfully pleased at your adding, " All of you are mentioned in the book, as also [Sir Richard] Morison and [Sir John] Cheke." I was very sorry to hear, from the conversa- tion of our friend Toxites, that the brothers Werter had carried away all those books with them into Thuringia. Those brothers should beware lest they become more notorious by this exploit, than they are already by birth and learning. They do an injury to you, to the study of learning itself, and to the anxious expectation of many worthy persons, and were I not writing of myself, I should say, especially to me ; who, though I was not the original pro- moter, yet advised you to undertake those renowned works worthy of hght and immortality, and most unworthy of darkness and some dirty little chest. But if these excellent fruits of your learning should decay and be lost through the meanness and avarice of these young men, I will assuredly try myself — but I must restrain my- self, lest I should speak too severely of them before I have ascer- tained your opinion about this act of theirs. If therefore you love me, my Sturmius, while I am yet alive, (for, as I have told you, this hectic of mine threatens to shorten my days,) do not allow me to be disappointed of the most delightful enjoyment of these books. I have had both the first and second book ; but the first, which I lent to Walter Haddon, the master of the Court of Requests, I have lost through the carelessness of his servants. I have often delighted myself with the perusal of these books, and was expecting all the rest at this last fair. Take care, I pray you, that this expectation of mine, connected as it is with so much honour to yourself, and so much advantage to all students, be not long disappointed. I am very glad that, as you write word to Hales, you have written in behalf of Philip against the sycophant Staphylus'. I gather from his writings that he is not only a mountebanlc Gnatho", but also a sort of honorary Thraso". For the folly and insolence of his ostentation is evident from the subscription of his letter to think Mr Haddon will judge. Vahan is writing it out apace : if he finish it before the post go, ye do receive it ; if not now, ye shall have it shortly. Sturmius is in hand with Analysis Ciceron. such a book as I believe was never set out in our time. Nobilissimi Worteri Jratres do give him, to find him writers, 400 crowns a year for four years." Ascham's English Works, Loud. 1815, p. 375.] [1 Frederic Staphylus had once boon the pupil and disciple of Melancthon. He apostatized from Lutheranism to the church of Rome in 1553, and was made a canon of Saltzburg and councillor to tho emperor Ferdinand I. lie died in 1504. His works were collected, and printed at Ingoldstat in 1613.] [2 Two characters in the Eunuch of Terence.] LXIV.] R. ASCIIAM TO J. STURMIUS. 137 the bishop of Auerstadt, •whore he says : " To your lordship, &c. Frederic Staphylus, councillor of his imperial majesty ;" a thing which the people care to know, no doubt : nor do I think that this is the fault of the printer, but the premeditated impudence of Sta- phylus himself ; for he writes the same thing of himself in his Apologetical treatise against Philip. The book to the bishop of Auerstadt was written by him in German last year ; turned into Latin, I think, by a Carmelite friar, and printed at Cologne, all venomous and slanderous throughout. I entreat of you, not by the Sicilian muses, but by sacred learning itself, to allow your book against Staphylus to see the light as soon as possible. I was wonderfully rejoiced at reading in your printed letter to our friend Cook, that you had written a work on the controversy respecting the [Lord's] supper, by no means, you say, violent, but you hope, full of argument. I can easily believe you, my Sturmius, For I know your disposition is entirely disposed to quietness and peace, not to quarrelsomeness and contention. I know also your learning, by which you are wont both easily to prove what you undertake, and to overcome when you contend, and where you thinlc your powers can be exercised with propriety. I have met with no greater pleasure these many years, than when my friend Toxites told me that your studies were so entirely devoted to sacred litera- ture. The cause of religion has lost a great deal by the death of Philip [Melancthon] and Martin Bucer^ ; but it will indeed gain yet more by the accession of John Sturmius to its defence. I pray God the Father, and our Lord and God Jesus Christ, that you may wholly give up yourself to the guidance of that Spirit at whose call you are summoned from the retreats of Parnassus and Helicon to the joyful pastures of mount Sion, the mountain of fatness. And though I would readily concede you both a lodging at Rome and an inn at Athens, so that you may occasionally betake yourself to which city you please, for the sake of diversion, and of reviving ancient intimacies and friendships ; yet I could wish that your constant habitation, and the abode not only of your life, but of all your studies, should be ever fixed in Jerusalem itself, the city of the great God. And I believe that many both brighter flashes and grander thunders of. speech can be shewn by you in our David, Isaiah, John and Paul, than have ever shone forth in all their Pindars, Plates, Demostheneses, or Ciceros. I pray God, if it is right to make such a request, to grant me such enjoyment of this life, 4xs that I may some time see the stings of your pen, either put [3 Melancthon died April 19, 1560, and Bucer in February 1551.] 138 R. ASCHAM TO J. STURMIUS. [lET. forth of your own accord, or roused into action by the provocation of others, against the popish drones, who occupy the more secret cells and almost all the choicest nests in the very temple of God. I fear, my Stm^mius, lest I should offend you more by my present prolixity, than by all that long-continued silence of mine, and neglect of writing ; though, if you choose to divide this loquacious letter into sundry parts, it cannot be said but that I have now written you many letters. But you will, I hope, pardon my pro- lixity, which if it prove offensive to you, I pray you to punish by a letter yet more prolix. I wish, my Sturmius, to know your opinion about Dionysius of Hahcarnassus. I believe him to have been the same Dionysius who taught in the house of Cicero, and of whom frequent mention is made in the letters of Cicero \ Cicero exceedingly commends his erudition, but not his moral character. When you leave that one city, and that single age of Phihp and Alexander, I do not see what Greek author, Plutarch liimself not excepted, you can compare with this Dionysius of Hahcarnassus. I wish to know from you whether you consider this opuiion of mine to have any foundation, or to be altogether erroneous. His treatise addressed to Tubero concerning his judgment of the history of Thucydides pleases me wonderfully. My wife, knowing how you are beloved by me, loves also your wife, and sends her, as a token of her good-will, a gold ring, made in the shape of an arrow, with this inscription, The gift of a faithful friend. Toxites has the ring. Excuse this letter ; for our friend Toxites is in such a hurry, that I have no time to copy it. Farewell in Christ Jesus. From my house in London, April 11, 1562. Your most attached, R. Ascham. LXV. BISHOP PARKHURST TO H. BULLINGER. j^A. 46.] LuDHAM, April 28, 15C2. Health to you in Christ, most renowned Bulhng-er. You accuse my countrymen here of ingratitude, because they never write to you. And I am afraid that you wUl charge me with the same neglect, for not having wi'itten to you at the last fair. My Bullinger, lay any thing to my charge rather than ingratitude. [1 See his Epistolcc ad Diversos, xiii. 77. and other passages : but the Dionysius meant is not the Halicai'nassian.] LXV.] BISHOP PARKHURST TO H. BULLINGER. 139 Believe me, I had rcather not be at all, than be ungrateful. You must impute my not writing to illness, and that a very dangerous one, and not to myself. Can I indeed be forgetful of my Zurich friends? Indeed I cannot, dum memor ipse met, dum sjnritus hos reget artus. And that you might not think I had forgotten you, (since I was unable to write through illness), I sent you a small present. Whenever I shall have paid my first fruits, and extricated myself from debt, you shall know who and what kind of a man is your friend Parkhm^st. As for my brother bishops, and others whom, you accuse of ingratitude, and not without reason, I shall handle them severely enough, and authoritatively enough, when I see them, (although they have said enough in favom* of authority). Nor shall I cease writing to them in the mean time ; for I have an amanuensis, who can write English, but not Latin. Meanwhile, my good friend, speak well of my countrymen, although they deserve to be ill spoken of. I thank you for the book which you have sent me, and which contains, as you say, your last winter's lucubrations against Bren- tius~. But I have not yet received it, though I hope to receive it shortly. May the Lord open the eyes of Brentius and all the Lutherans, lest in so great a light they should be overwhelmed with darkness! I have not yet seen the son of your standard-bearer, Fabricius. In three days' time I shall send for him to Norwich; for he probably declines coming to me without an invitation. He will arrive most welcome, nor shall he leave me altogether without a present. If but a Zurich dog should come over to me (though I am not ac- quainted with any except Gualter''s Wartley) I would make the most of him, and not treat him after dog-fashion. Thus briefly [have I replied] to your two letters. Religion is in the same state among us as heretofore ; a state, I say, not alto- gether to be thought lightly of. But I hope for an improvement at the approaching convocation. There are in England many good and zealous men ; there are many too cold, and not a few [2 Or Brentzen, the great patron of the Ubiquitarian doctriue. Calvin thus writes to Bucer concerning him : Non tenes quid inter alia scripser it Bren- tius, Christum, dam in prcesepi jaceret, gloriosum in coelojidsse, etiam secundum corpus. Calv. Bucero, p. 49. col. 2. Epistolse. Op. Vol. ix. It should be added, however, that on looking into the statements of Brentius, it a^jpears hardly fair not to have given a fuller explanation of his views on this subject.] 140 BISHOP PARKHL'RST TO H. BULLINGER. [lET. lukewarm, ■whom the Lord^ ivill spue out of his mouth. But, to be plain with you, I fear many evils are hanging over our heads. For almost all are covetous, all love gifts. There is no truth, no liberality, no knowledge of God. Men have broken forth to curse and to lie, and murder, and steal, and commit adultery. And what Empedocles" said of his Agrigentines, I may also say of my English: The English indulge in pleasures, as if they were to die to-morrow ; while they build, as if they were to hve always. But God grant that we may repent from our inmost soul ! Fare thee well, my most dehghtful Bullinger. Salute in my name your excellent wife, sons and daughters, all your learned sons-in-law, the magistrates, and all my friends. I pour forth prayers to God night and day in behalf of your republic. Again fxrcwell. My wife salutes you all. In haste. Ludham, April 28, 1562. Yours from my heart, John Parkhukst, Bishop of Norwich. LXVI. BISHOP PARKHURST TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 48.] Ludham, Mai/ 31, 1562. Health to you, most courteous Bullinger. I received your book against Brentius on the 16th of May, but have not yet read it, as I gave it to my bookseller to be bound. But I will read it in a few days, as soon as my Norwich bookseller shall have sent it back ; and I thank you very much for it. Send me always, I pray you, your very learned lucubrations : you can do nothing more agreeable to me. Story ^, that httle man of law and most impudent papist, has been arrested, as I understand, in the west of England, in his barrister's robes. Fabricius came to me on the 15tli of May, and I treat him as a Zuricher, that is, as my ownself. I am very sorry that he cannot make a longer stay with me, for I would rather keep him with me some months, aye, some years, than some days. I converse with him in Latin, English, and (what you will be surprised at) in German. He is astonished also that I can speak German so well. [1 Rev. iii. 16.] [2 This saying is attributctl to Empedocles by Diogenes Laertius ; but by .^lian to riato. See Bayle.J [3 8co above, p. 103. lie was afterwards condemned and executed as a traitor. Strype, Annals, I. i. 115.] LXVI.] BISHOP PAUKHURST TO H. BULLINGER. 141 The dizziness in my head has not yet left me, but is somewhat better. You will hear the news from Gualter. I wrote towards the end of April a letter to yourself, masters Martyr, Gesner, Gualter, Lavater, Simler, Julius, and Froschover, which I hope you have received. Master Walter Iladdon, a learned and pious man, dined with me three days since. He desired to be kindly remembered to you, and to master Martyr and others. Salute all your friends in my name. I wish all happiness to all my Zurich friends. Farewell, very dear Bullinger, and love me, as you do, and pray to God for me. In haste. Ludham, May 25, 1562. My wife salutes you all. I have sealed this letter on the last day of May 1562. Yours, John Parkhurst, Bishop of Norwich. LXVII. BISHOP GRINDAL TO C. HUBERT. QB. 31.] London, June 6, 15C2. Health in Christ. I greatly commend your regard, my very dear master Conrad, to the memory of our common instructor^, Bucer. But I cannot help blaming the ingratitude of others, who are endeavouring to traduce the apostle and father of your city, who was its father'^ in Christ, as the author of unsound doctrines, or a heretic. For what else are they doing, when they prevent his writings from being published? I am surprised that your magistrates allow so much licence to these new orators, and that the memory of the departed Bucer is not of more avail with them than the clamours of these men. But I am unwilling to pry into the affairs of another state. Your Atlases are too late in their support of the Saxon heaven, which is now every where falling to [4 Sandys, Grindal, and Bradford were intimately acquainted with Bucer, when ho was King's Professor of Divinity at Cambridge. Strypc, Parker, i. 55.] [5 Bucer was admitted in 1523 into the number of the reformed preachers at Strasburg, and subscribed a book with them, which they pub- lished in 1524, setting forth the reasons that induced them to renounce popery. He assisted in 1529, as deputy of the church of Strasburg, in the conferences of Marpurg, where they endeavoured to pacify the dissensions between the Lutherans and Zuinglians.] 142 BISHOP GRIXDAL TO C. HUBERT. [lET. the ground. I lately saw a letter from Bremen, giving an account of the state of that city. After the banishment of Doctor Albert^ they enacted most severe laws against the Zuinghans, or rather the Albertines, threatening them with prisons, exiles, and proscriptions. They prevented a very eminent man, master Daniel a Buren, from entering upon the office of chief magistrate, which had come to him by rotation in January last, because he was favourable to our sen- timents ; and they substituted another person in his place. But he recovered the mayoralty with the entire consent of the citizens, and afterwards banished those troublesome preachers, or rather croak- ers. It is astonishing that they are raising such commotions about predestination. They should at least consult their own Luther on " the bondage of the will." For what else do Bucer, Calvin, and Martyr teach, that Luther has not maintained in that treatise ? L^nless perhaps they wish to take refuge in some recantation of Luther, whom they all but regard as a god. Luther has indeed deserved exceeding well of the church, and is worthy of being celebrated by all posterity. But he would have been more eminent in my eyes, if these Canaans were not always discovering the nakedness of their father, which all godly persons desire to be con- cealed. But do you, most learned Conrad, persevere in defending the fame of Bucer, and in maintaining the truth. The Lord will not suffer this cause, which is liis own, to be always kept under. I doubt not but that your modesty and firmness will have much in- fluence with all godly persons. I congratulate you too upon having as your colleague and assistant in so holy an undertaking master John Sturmius, whom I pray you earnestly to salute in my name. I thank you for the copies, but have not yet been able to receive them. They are perhaps loitering some where on the way. You will receive from Abel or Salkyns^ (if he bring you this letter) two golden coins of our country, stamped after a new fashion, and in a manner resembling print. Give one of these from me to Stur- mius, and keep the other for yourself. I pray you also to salute from me master Doctor Sebald, to whom I have sent another coin of the same kind, which I beg you to deliver to him yourself. My [secretary] Dithelm, by his father's command, is shortly to go [1 Albert Hardenberg, the intimate friend of Melancthon, was the first person who attempted to introduce at Bremen the doctrine of Calvin con- cerning the euchai'ist. He was in consequence expelled from that city in looG.] [2 Salkyns was the servant of Richard Hilles.] LXVII.] BISHOP GRINDAL TO C. HUBERT. 143 into France. I wish you every blessing in the Lord. From my house in London, June 6, 1562. Yours in Christ, Edmund Grindal, Bishop of London. These three pieces of gold, more remarkable for their work- manship than their value, I have inclosed in this letter, and with them an engraving of the second funeral of Bucer, recently pub- lished by one of our printers. LXVIII. ARCHBP. PARKER TO MATT. FLACIUS^ &c. [B. 36.] Croydon July 18, [sine anno.] This godly courtesy of yours, reverend sirs, is very gratifying to me, that you have lately caused your commentaries to be delivered to me by a confidential messenger* ; whereby you have rendered it more easy for me to defend you in your own name, in case any persons should hereafter falsely calumniate the doctrine that you profess. Wliich doctrine indeed and behef of yours, however it may in part fail of pleasing every one, yet I openly admit that you have acted ingenuously and sincerely, in having so fully, so entirely, and so clearly and unambiguously declared your mind and sentiments. Yet, upon due consideration of these your opinions, I cannot but lament that there should be some disagreement among us upon the chief controversies of religion, especially as each party is taught by the same rule of scripture, and animated by the same zeal both for the restoration of the truth and the utter extermina- tion of all error and falsehood from the territories of the church of Christ. Oh, how great an occasion of falling is here presented to good men ! how greatly on this ground is the very restoration of the gospel loaded with reproaches and rcvilings by our enemies ! I wish indeed, that each party would hsten to the other without [3 Matthias Flacius, or Francowitz, was a native of Albona in Illyria. He was the chief author of that ecclesiastical history, knoA\7i under the name of the Centm-ia) Magdeburgenses, the fourth of which Avas dedicated to queen Elizabeth, in 1560, and was probably the book sent to archbishop Parker. His principal coadjutors were John Wigand, Matt. Judex, Basil Faber, with whom may be reckoned about fifteen others of less note. Matthias Flacius died in 1575. See Melchior Adam.] [} This was probably either Bernard Niger, afterwards mentioned, or Mark Wagner, who visited the libraries of England, Denmark and Scotland, in search of materials for the Magdobui'gh ceuturiators. See Sagittarius Introd. ad Hist. Eccl. p. 254.] 144 AKCIIBISHOP PARKER TO MATT. FLACIUS, &C. [lET. prejudice, and with greater patience and attention ; and that neither should be so wedded to his opinion, as to render this pubHc cause of rehgion an occasion of glorying, ambition, and dissent. With regard to the principal object for which your private messenger came over, namely, that he might bring back to you some ancient commentaries of such kind as you hoped to obtain from us' ; you must know, that the more diligent I have been fully to satisfy your wishes in this respect, or rather, to assist in that labour which you have undertaken to the great benefit of the universal christian church, the more unfortunate, to my thinking, has hitherto been the result ; and where I had rested my chief hopes of attaining what I desired, I am now left without any hope whatever. And yet, after having sent numberless messengers to many persons and places to no effect, I was at length stirred up to recover the books of master Bale", which, it was said, there would be some prospect of obtaining, if I chose to make the attempt. I ascertained therefore, upon inquiry, into whose hands they fell after his flight^ from Ireland ; and when a great heap of them was brought to me, I discovered clearly that none of them were, in my opinion, cither valuable for their antiquity, or written on any subject useful and adapted to your purpose. When however your [1 The archbishop had acquainted Flacius with a promise of the queen's, to send him certain vetera monumcnta, to assist him as well in the work of his Catalogue of the witnesses of the Truth, as in his other woi'ks of ecclesiastical history. See his letter to the archbishop in Strype, Parker, i. 219, m. 52.] [2 John Bale, bishop of Ossory. " His rare collection of MSS/', says Strype, " after his decease, came into our archbishop's hands by purchase. For he laid out for them immediately upon his death, fearing they might bo gotten by somebody else. And perhaps divers of those books, that do now make proud the university library, and that of Bene't, and some other colleges in Cambridge, were Bale's before they were the archbishop's." Strype, Parker, ii. 520. If this statement be correct, since Bale died in Nov. 1563, this letter was probably written in the July following.] [3 Bale became greatly exposed, at the accession of queen Mary, to the outrages of the papists in Ireland. Once in particular, we are told, that five of his domestics wei'o mm'dcred, while they were making hay near his house ; and, having received intimation that the priests were plotting his death, he retired from his see to Dublin. He afterwards made his escape in a small vessel from that port, but was taken by the captain of a Dutch man of war, who stripped him of all his money and effects, and, when he amved in Holland, obliged him to pay thirty pounds before he could recover Ixis liberty. See the " Vocacyon of Johan Bale to the bishoprick of Ossorie in Irelande, his I*ersecucions in the same, and finall Dclyverance, A. p. 1663." It is reprinted in the Hai'l. Misc. Vol. vi.] LXVIII.] ARCHBISHOP PARKER TO MATT. FLACIU3, &C. 145 friend Niger* saw them, together with mine and some others, he said that many of them would be of much use. He has them therefore, upon the condition of returning them within a year. But if you are in possession of so rich a collection and apparatus of the writers of our nation, as is mentioned in your catalogue, I think you must have a far greater number than is left in all England, of which I have any certain knowledge and information : whether it be that some parties are unwilling to obhge you in this useful endeavour, and by reason of some private dislike refuse to consider the public benefit of the church ; or whether some are un- willing to have it known that such things are in their possession : and thus, like the dog in the manger, they neither enjoy them themselves, nor allow the enjoyment of them to others. Moreover the queen's majesty's library does not possess the means of afford- ing the assistance which you require, as I have been informed by the person who is appointed its curator and keeper. This then is the state of the case, that I am unable to satisfy your request, as I could wish ; although, before I had been taught by experience, I. confidently beheved that I could assist you to a greater extent. Certainly the colleges and all the religious houses were plundered, before it was considered what great inconvenience would arise to the church of Christ by this clandestine dispersion and loss of books. The papists however will not produce any thing ; for it is said that when they were in possession of monuments of this kind, which undermined the greatest part of their doctrine, they com- mitted some good authors to the flames, as if they envied the Avorld the perusal of them : and this I know to have been the case with the books of Vigihus'', wliich they have abused in this way. I should have written more upon these things, and upon this laborious yet profitable task which you are imdertaking in com- posing this history, only that I am so prevented, partly by ill health, and partly from other causes, that I cannot give such free consideration to these thoughts as I could wish. There are some persons who desire that in your history should be set forth the very words of those authors of whom you only make a bare mention. And though this may be very troublesome in a history [* Bernard Niger was one of the Magdcbirrgh centui-iators.] [^ Vigilius was bishop of Thapsus, a.d. 484: but the allusion here is most probably to VirgiUus (Polydore Virgil), who is reported to have burned the books which he had used in compiling his wox'ks. Soo Foxo, Acts and Monuments. Book vnr. Vol. ii. p. ?,7H, edit. 1684.] 10 146 ARCHBISHOP PARKER TO MATT. FX.AC1US, &C. [lET. of such extent, and is of no use to men of much reading ; yet it will afford some light to beginners, and will also be of great weight against calumniators. But I leave the consideration of this to your futui'e discretion. I send you twenty angels, as a testimony of my obhgation to you, which I request you to take in good part. Meanwhile I pray that the Holy Spirit of God may be with you, as the continual helper of your endeavours. Farewell in Christ. July 18. Croydon. Your loving friend, Matthew Parker \ LXIX. R. HILLES TO H. BULLINGER. [B. 38.] LoxDON, July 31, 1562, This letter will inform you, my venerable and loving friend, that I have received yours written at Zurich on the 22nd of June last. And I thank you exceedingly, not only because you were disposed to write to me, but because you condescend to inform me, both what news is now stirring amongst you, and also what, as far as you hear, will be the result. But as to the council of Trent ^ I cannot but think of it rather as a sign of some plot or conspiracy formed against the protestants, than of a synod of faithful catholics simply assembhng together in the truth, for the purpose of eradi- cating, according to their power, such abuses as have crept into the church of Christ. And I am grieved not a httle, when I hear that you who profess the gospel in Switzerland, are not able, either by your sound doctrine or your examples of godly life, to draw over your confederate fellow-soldiers to the religion of the gospel ; and that they are still so opposed to your endeavours for the reforma- tion of religion, as to cause apprehension that the matter will shortly proceed to a quarrel or open hostihties. With respect, how- ever, to the state of things in France, and especially as to what is going on at Paris and Eouen^, it is certain, as you say, that we can get as early information as those who live at Zurich ; but wo [1 This letter was published from the original by Jo. Christ. Wolf, at Hambui'gh iu 1736, who states that the signature alone, with the preceding words, is in the hand-writing of the archbishop.] [2 The council of Trent was resumed Jan. 18, 15G2, under Pius IV, who had succeeded Paul IV. iu 1559.] [3 Pieparations were now making for the investment of Rouen, which city was garrisoned by the Huguenots, and taken by assault imder the duko of Guise, on Oct. 26.] LXIX.] R. HILLES TO H. BULLINGER. 147 cannot positively ascertain, till after a long interval, the truth of what is doing in the upper provinces of France, as at Orleans and Lyons. We EngUsh, however, (God be thanked!) are still living in much peace and quietness. Nevertheless the queen appears to be considering the evils that may possibly be hanging over us, and is apprehensive lest any misfortune should arise to the realm by reason of negligence and inactivity ; that is, lest any foreign prince (in the event of the disorders, which still exist in France, being settled,) should be stirred up by the Roman pontiff or any other foreign papists who adhere to him, to find some occasion of quarrel against her ; when the real ground of offence would be, that the authority of her majesty, in the council of parliament, and by the consent of the whole realm, has done away with his usurped power, and the continuance of the superstitions, abuses, and idolatry which heretofore crept into the catholic church. The queen however has a great number both of soldiers and ships already prepared for the defence for her kingdom, should it be necessary. My wife and children, thank God, are well. She thanks you for your remem- brance of her in your letter, and heartily salutes you and your wife, whom I beg you also to salute in my name, as also master Lewis Lavater. Farewell, and take care of your health. London, July 31, 1562. Yours, JllCHARD HiLLES. LXX. BISHOP COX TO P. MARTYR. [A. 49.] London, August 5, 15(J2. Too long an interval seems to me to have elapsed, since we have mutually addressed each other by letter ; though 1 must fain acknowledge the receipt of letters from you, since I have written any thing to you. Meanwhile, however, I derive much gratification both from yourself and others, in that you are so diligently and unweariedly labouring in the Lord's vineyard, for the advancement and edification of the church of God in tliis wicked ago. I now and then receive most agreeable intelligence of your labours, to my great delight and advantage. I have lately been employed in your book on Judges, which you most kindly sent to me ; and I am waiting for the commentaries which you promised on the books of Kings, that I may often hold intercourse with my friend Peter, as lono: as I am able to ranijc at laro'c amono; his writino-s. It is not in my power to estimate your kindness towards me : meanwhile, 10—2 148 BISHOP cox TO p. MART\n, [i.EI'. however, I have sent you twenty crowns by master Sprlngham'. as a small testimony of my gratitude. I know that you will take it in good part. If you wish for any information respecting our affairs, — when we consider the temper and fickleness of mankind, when we regard either the contempt of the word [of God] or the neglect of a religious life, we can hardly dare to expect a long continuance of the gospel in these palrts. There is every where an immense number of papists, though for the most part concealed : they have been quiet hitherto, except that they are cherishing their errors in their secret assemblies, and willingly shut their ears against the hearing of the word. When however we reflect upon the infinite goodness of God, which has restored us to our native land, and given his word free course, and committed to us the ministry thereof, we take courage, and cherish a firm hope that we shall not again be forsaken by so kind a Father. Let us therefore continue to serve him with a courageous and strong 'mind, castmg all our care and the success of our affairs upon him. The heads of our popish clergy are still kept in confinement. They are treated indeed with kindness, but relax nothing of their popery. Others are living at large, scattered about in different parts of the kingdom, but without any function, unless perhaps where they may be sowing the seeds of impiety in secret. Our neighbours the Scot^ thank God! are happily furthering the gospel. The papists are wonderfully raising their spirits, since the disorders in France. May God of his accustomed goodness turn all things to the good of those who love him ! may he defend his own people, and shortly break in pieces the fury of his enemies ! Amen. We are anxiously desirous to learn what is going on in your parts, and especially in reference to the kingdom of Christ. May the Lord Jesus preserve you to us very long in safety ! Salute in my name master Henry Bullinger, a man worthy of all possible regard. I and my wife salute you and yours, London, Aug. 5, 1562. Your brother in Christ, Richard Cox, Bishop of Ely. No one has as yet crushed the furious Hosius^. [1 Richard Springham was a merchant of London, a contributor to the afflicted gospellers, temp, queen Maiy. Strype, Memorials, in. i. 224.] [2 Cardinal Hosius was sent by Pius IV. to engage the emperor Ferdinand to continue the council of Trent ; where ho was employed as legato, to open and preside at the council. His chief works are, 1. Confessio catholicce fidei, said to have been reprinted, in various languages, thirty-four times. 2. De communione sub utraque specie. 3. De sacerdotum conjugio. 4. De missa vulgari lingua celehranda. He died in 157.9. In a letter from Cox to Cecil, LXXl.J H. FOLKERZHEIMER TO J, 81MLER. 149 LXXI. H. FOLKERZHEIMER^ TO J. SIMLER. [B. 39.] Salisbury, Aug. 13, 1562. Tell me, my Josiah, what has come into your mind, that in your last letter you thought you had nothing worth writing about to one who is so exceedingly inquisitive about all your affairs as I am ? What then ? Must I remain ignorant what effect my poor letters produce, how my friends are going on, how my garden is flourishing, which, though then in idea and thought only, had how- ever begun to be formed in rows? But yet I will nevertheless admit that you deserve some thanks, in spite of your short and in- auspicious letter, because you did not, happily, omit to mention my father''s health. As the bishop of Salisbury had given me a most friendly invitation to visit him, and I perceived that France was so disturbed by civil discord* that literary pursuits were altogether at a stand ; having left Poictiers I proceeded to Rochelle, a port of France of some celebrity, and visited at my leisure, not without danger, the salt-works of Brouage^, and other places in the neigh- bourhood. But having obtained tolerably fine weather, (for al- though the wind was by no means favourable, I did not shrink from a second trial,) I left llochelle on the 29th of June". Nothing was more irksome than the want of a companion to converse with ; so that there came into my mind all at once rocks, tempests, shallows, pirates, a rascal of a captain, and in short every thing that might have befallen Arion of old. But I was in no fear that the God of hosts, who rules the sea, the winds and the tempests, and who had ever been my most faithful guide through the whole of my past life, Avould forsake me then, because he especially promises to protect those who go down to the sea. When therefore we were carried into the bay of Biscay, we kept such a continued from Downham, dated Dec. 28, 1563, the bishop says, " Hosius' bokes flye abrode in all corners, unica gloriatlo omnium jHtpistarum, who swarme in all corners, saying and doing almost what they lyste." MS. Lansd. 6, 87.] [3 Herman Folkcrzheimer was of a noble family in East Friesland ; he afterwards became Ilofmeistcr to Christopher, archbishop, duke, and count Palatine.] [4 Namely, by the wars which had broken out some months before be- tween the Roman catholics and protestants.] [^ Brouage is near a bay of the sea, 17 miles south of llochelle.] [6 The Lat. has tertiu Cal. Sextil. But this is evidently a mistake, as it appears by bishop Jewel's letter to Simler, that Folkcrzheimer reached Salis- bury on the 8th of July. And on the 20th, as appears from a subsequent part of this letter, he visited Stouehenge.] 150 H. FOLKERZHEIMER TO J. SIMLER. [lET. course nio-ht and day, that altliouo;li the storms were rao;in2; as usual, we only once cast anchor. When we had been tossed about in this manner for the space of eight days, the much wished for land began at last to appear in sight, and having left the isle of Wight on our right, we landed at Southampton. Here I heartily thanked God, and recruited myself, having become a good deal fatigued by my tossing about on the sea. Three days after, having fortunately procured a good horse, I arrived at Salisbury. When the bishop saw me, to the great surprise of his attendants, he hastened towards me as I was entering, and closely embracing me. Oh ! my Herman, said he, you are welcome ; you are come as a guest than whom I have received no one with greater pleasure of a long time. He then particularly inquired how Martyr, Julius, Bulhnger, Josiah, Lavater, Zuinglius, and oui* other common friends were going on ? whether all was well with them ? I replied that I hoped so, but that I did not know for certain, as from having been resident in France in such uncertain and turbulent times, I had received no intelligence of your affairs either by letter or report. The remainder of our discourse was employed in conversation upon French matters. He assigned me two very accomplished young men, acquainted with the French language, for my companions, and they were to conduct me wherever I chose. We viewed the city, the churches, the little rivulets, one of which flows most dehghtfully through every street. But although the whole of the city belongs to the bishop, his domestic arrangements delighted me more than any thing else. His palace, in the first place, is so spacious and magnificent, that even sovereigns may, and are wont to be suitably entertained there, whenever they come into these parts. Next, there is a most exten- sive garden, kept up with especial care, so that in the levelling, laying out, and variety, nothing seems to have been overlooked. A most limpid stream runs through the midst of it, which, though agreeable in itself, is rendered much more pleasant and delightful by the swans swimming upon it, and the abundance of fish, which (the bishop) is now causing to be inclosed in an iron lattice-work. After having most courteously saluted me on the following day, he turned to his attendants, and, " Let the horses," he said, " be saddled and bridled, and take this guest of mine a hunting." Ac- cordingly having taken our dogs with us, when we arrived at the place where the game was wont to hide, we pursued two deer which we had discovered ; both of which, before they were worn out with running, the dogs with incredible swiftness quickly came LXXI.] H. FOLKERZHEIMER TO J. SIMLER, 151 up with, and easily caught and brought them to the ground. There was, however, but httle occasion for the halloo with which Xenophon sets on his dogs in hunting, Well, well, well clone, dogs, well done; for our dogs did their duty even without being set on. Do you ask whether we often go a hunting ? The bishop indeed, I per- ceive, does not take much delight in this kind of amusement. What pleasure, says he, I pray you, can possibly be derived from pur- suing with fierce dogs a timid animal, that attacks no one, and that is put to flight even by a noise? I should, however, tell an untruth, were I to say that I am not dehghted with it. But yet, were I frequently to repeat the same thing, I think it would not afford me so much amusement. But although the bishop never goes out a hunting, and I very seldom, the dogs are by no means idle. The young men are required to provide a supply of venison, that the table may always give proof of the activity of the dogs and the labours of the huntsmen. But as I like to deal with you after our custom, the custom I mean, of the most intimate companions, I shall allow myself this liberty of prating, and will not abstain even from the most minute details ; though indeed you deserve from me nothing of the kind, who are so cautious as not to weary me either with joking or sober sense. See, my excellent Josiah, how my circumstances have changed in so short a time. When I left France in silence and in concealment, and in the greatest loneliness, I had nothing to relieve my weariness but one little book ; every thing was so dirty and loathsome and disagreeable, that the ship would make one sick, even were it laid up on shore. The table was laid out, as Cicero^ says, not with shell or other fish, but with a quantity of stinking meat. The same person was cook and steward. Piso had no baker at home, nor I from home : he got his bread and wine at a huckster's, and from a public house ; but I, poor wretch, as soon as I had emptied my flask, could find no huckster from whom I could procure one, nor any public house, where they would draw one even the smallest quantity at the greatest cost ; so that as soon as our wine had failed about the fifth day, we mixed vinegar and water, which to most of us, thirsty as we then were, did not seem very different from it. I reached a fortunate island when I arrived at Sahsbury. Immortal powers ! what a sudden change I experi- enced, what power of breathing freely after my long imprisonment! I am transplanted into the magnificent abode of a prosperous in- dividual, with whom, as you know, I have long been on the most [1 See Cic. in Pisonem, 27.] 152 H, rOLKEUZHEIMER TO J. Sl-MLKR, [lLT. intimate and friendly terms. He, remembering our ancient intimacy, received me in such a manner, that he could not have received even his own brother more lovingly. He directed his attendants, most elegant young men of rank, and very different from our dirty crew of sailors, to order some wine to be brought. The butler forthwith makes his appearance, bearing a large golden goblet. And also, when dinner or supper time arrived, how can I describe to you the abundance or magnificence of the silver plate? Yet great as it is, it does not seem to afford much pleasure to its possessor, and appears to have been provided rather for his guests'* sake than his own. But, without entering upon any further details, you will easily guess the nature of them, and judge of the difference between a ship and a palace. For my part, I am quite ready to allow those who choose to philosophize on the subject, to be of Xenophon's opinion, that domestic economy is nowhere better understood than on board a ship, and to require all heads of families to imitate their carefulness ; provided only that I am at liberty to keep my own opinion. On the 20tli of July^ we rode into the country with a large retinue, as the bishop said he would shew me some things that would astonish me. When I saw the cavalcade in the middle of the plain, Why, said I, is not Josiah a witness of this ? or Bullinger, or indeed any Zuricher? for as to Peter Martyr, he is well ac- quainted mth all your circumstances. I wish, he repHed, those worthy men were here. But what do you think they are now doing? Perhaps, he said, they have finished their dinner, and I fancy that I see Martyr seated in his elbow chair. When we had gone on a httle farther, he very kindly pointed out to me the whole character and bearing of the neighbourhood. There, says he, stretching out his arm, was formerly old Sarum ; there are the mounds wliich you can distinguish even now, and there the ram- parts. And then, in another place. Here was a camp of the ancient Romans^, of which these are the vestiges that we see. At length we arrived at the place which Jewel had particularly wished me to visit, and respecting which I should hesitate to write what I have seen, unless I could confirm it by most approved witnesses; because it has generally been my custom, when I had ascertained anything to be true, which might at first sight appear incredible, rather to prefer not to mention it, than to describe it, lest I should be regarded as unworthy of credit. I beheld, in a very extensive [1 See above, p. 149, note 6.] [2 The present remains are generally supposed to be Saxon.] LXXI.] H. FOLKERZHEIMER TO J. SI.MLEK. 153 plain, at a great distance from the sea, in a soil which appeared to have nothing in common with the nature of stones or rocks, I beheld, I say, stones of immense size, almost every one of which, if you should weigh them, would be heavier than even your whole house. The stones are not heaped one upon another, nor even laid together, but are placed upright, in such a way that two of them support a third. Put forth now the powers of your under- standing, and guess, if you are able, by what strength, or rather (for what could strength do in such a case ?) by what mechanical power these stones have been brought together, set up, and raised on high? And then, for what object has this immense mass been erected ? The bishop says, that he caimot see by what means even the united efforts of all the inhabitants could move a single stone out of its place. He is of opinion, however, that the Romans formerly erected them here as trophies, and that the very disposi- tion of the stones bears some resemblance to a yoke. But you will wish to know, with what studies I am so kilhng myself, as to make me seek after so many kinds of relaxation, and recreate myself so often. Believe me, hardly any of a serious na- ture. Since the time I left Paris, I have given a long hohday to my friends Euclid, Archimedes, and also Ptolemy, and have not once disturbed those grave philosophers. I have bestowed all my labour and industry, if I had any, upon jurisprudence. Meanwhile, however, when I now and then interposed a little history, I care- fully noted such things as appertain to the geographical description of Arabia Fehx ; as, for instance, the locahties of cities and rivers, promontories, bays, and fountains. But a description of the sea- coast might be looked for in Arrian, who took a survey of the Red sea and Persian gulph, because Ai'abia is included within these. At this present time, therefore, I am principally paying attention to histories, of which Jewel's excellent hbrary affords me great abundance. The affairs of France disturb me greatly. I implore the mercy of our good and gracious God, that putting away the remembrance of the grievous sins that we have committed, and pardoning them through his dear and only Son, he may regard his own glory and name. May he deign to be our guide and leader, and encompass our army not with wall, boundary, or ditch, but, as he has pro- mised, with legions of angels ! May the golden sceptre, which he has committed to the all-powerful hand of his Son, be at length ■ brought forth, and break in pieces those vessels of pottery and earthen-ware, and disperse them, as they deserve, like the dust, 154 H, FOLKERZHEIMER TO J. SIMLRR. [lET. that tliej may not be able to find a resting place ; but yet so that they may not obscure the praise and glory of his Christ, nor spread darkness over the splendor of his light ! Salute very much in my name your wife, my very dear and excellent father Peter Martyr, Julius, the Bullingers, Haller, La- vater, Zuinglius, Pelhcan, Gualter, Wolfius, Funckius, Gesner, to whom I wish you would say, that I have written to my brother about the seal-skin ; and should he pay no attention to it, as he is newly married, you may promise that I will carefully attend to it myself. Farewell, my dearest Josiah. Farewell. August 13, 1562. Salisbury. [Herman Folkerzheimer.] LXXII. BISHOP JEWEL TO H. BULLINGER' [A. 50.] Salisbury, Auj. 14, 15(12. Tour letter written at Zurich on the 5th of March has but lately been delivered to me ; and though a little scolding and que- rulous, it was nevertheless very gratifying, not only as coming from you, all of whose writings and conversation have always been so much esteemed by me, but also, as so earnestly claiming the performance of my duty, and stirring up my negligence and remiss- ness in writing. But, my father and much esteemed master, al- though, perhaps, I Avrite to you less frequently than I could wish, yet as often as any opportunity presents itself, I never decline this duty. In proof of this, I have lately written you two letters, one to Frankfort at the March fair, and the other immediately after Easter ; and if these are still delayed on the road, as may possibly be the case, they will some time or other be released, and will, I hope, reach you at last. In the mean time I never cease either to think of, or speak about you as honourably as I ought to do. To Avrito to you at the present time about the affairs of France would probably be impertinent ; for all the news is brought you without the help of either wind or vessels. The most holy [father] will leave nothing untried : Flectere si ncqueat superos, Acheronta movebit. For he sees that the struggle is not about things of no importance, but a matter of life and death. I wish our friends may not suffer themselves to be overreached. As the duke of Guise, by holding out I know not what hope of settling the affairs of religion, and receiving the confession of LXXII.] BISHOP JFWEL TO H. BIILLIXGER. 155 Augsburg, has prevented the princes of Germany from intermeddling in this war; so he has endeavoured by all possible means to per- suade our queen that the present contest in France is not about matters of religion, but that there is an evident conspiracy against the government; that it is the cause of the king, whom, as being herself also invested with royal authority, she ought not to oppose. Meanwhile he has caused his niece, the queen of Scotland, to court the favour and friendsliip of our queen, and send her presents, and make I know not what promises ; so that she purposes this summer to come upon a visit of honour into England \ and to estabhsh a perpetual treaty of friendship, never to be dissolved. She has sent her a diamond of great value, a most beautiful gem, set in gold, and accompanied by some beautiful and elegant verses ^ What next? They seem to suppose that by festive interviews, and hunting matches, and flatteries, our attention will easily be diverted from the noise of war, and lulled to sleep. In the mean time our queen, when she saw through the whole affair, and perceived what was doing, (and this was not a matter of much difficulty,) changed her purpose respecting her progress, gradually withdrew her alliance with the Guises, and not obscurely intimated her determination to assist the prince of Conde^. [The duke of] Guise was very angry [1 « Whereas the queen of Scots was the first that desired an interview, it was not without suspicion that she did it to serve her turn, and to tem- porize, that she might either strengthen her title to England, or else give hope and courage to the jDapists in England, and to the Guises her kinsmen in France." See Camden's Elizabeth, p. 60. In a letter of Cecil, dated Oct. 11, 1562, he writes, " The queue's majestie was contented in June to ac- cord upon an entcrview in August Avith the queue of Scotts, coming to Not- tingham, so as the matters in Fraunce looke good; and before the last of July, and because at that tyme the trebles grew to be more desperate, the enter- view was disappointed, and so excuse was sent to the queue of Scotts by Sir Henry Sidney, with offer to mete at Yorke betwixt Midsomer and the end of August, which is like to succede as the planets of Fraunce shall be disposed.'* MS. Cotton. Vespas. c. vii. 224.] [2 Written by Buchanan, then in her court. Burnet, in. 451.] [3 Elizabeth made a contract with the prince of Conde, Rohan, Coligni, and others, " that she would pay them an hmidi-ed thousand angels ; that she should send them over into France six thousand men, whereof thi-ee thousand should be employed for the defence of Dieppe and Rouen ; and tliat they should deliver into her hands, for caution, Franciscopolis, a town built by king Francis the first at the mouth of the Seine, which the English call New- haven, and the French Port do Grace, or Havre de Grace, which town three thousand English soldiers should hold and defend in the French king's name, ''till Calais should be restored." Camden's Elizabeth, p. 61. See also tho letter of Cecil, referred to in note 1.] 156 BISHOP JKW'EL TO H. BULLINGEK. [lET. at this interruption to his designs, and received our ambassador •with reproaches ; and declared by a pubHc proclamation, that the queen of England was planning intrigues against the kmgdom of France, and that she alone had occasioned those disorders. Our queen could not bear this charge with patience, nor indeed ought she to have done. She forthwith began to act with openness, as I hear, to recal her ambassador, to enlist troops ^ to dismast all vessels, both English and foreign, from whatever place, or wherever they might be, to prevent their getting away, and giving informa- tion of what she was doing. Oh ! if she had acted in this manner some time since, or if the German princes would even now follow her example, the whole business would have been settled much more easily, and with much less waste of christian blood. And indeed the queen has now sent into Germany, to the princes : and there is now at court an ambassador from Guise, with new blandish- ments, as I suppose, to delay and hinder us. But it will not, I think, be so easy a matter to deceive people with their eyes open. The affairs of Scotland, as to religion, are tolerably quiet. The queen^*alone retains her mass, contrary to the general wish. There has been here, throughout the whole of this present year, an incre- dibly bad season both as to the weather and state of the atmo- sphere. Neither sun, nor moon, nor winter, nor spring, nor summer, nor autumn, have performed their appropriate offices. It has rained so abundantly, and almost without intermission, as if the heavens could hardly do any thing else. Out of this contagion monstrous births have taken place ; infants with hideously deformed bodies, some being quite without heads, some with heads belonging to other creatures ; some born without arms, legs, or shin-bones ; some were mere skeletons, entirely without flesh, just as the image of death is generally represented. Similar births have been produced in abundance from swine, mares, cows, and domestic fowls. The harvest is now coming on, rather scanty indeed, but yet so as we have not much to complain of. Salisbury, Aug. 14, 1562. Yours in Christ, John Jewel, Anglus. \} Strype relates, that November the 14th at night came a commandment to London, that prayers should be used there three days successively to God, to grant his hel]) and good success to the English army now gone beyond sea, against the duke of Guise, sworn enemy to the protestants, whom the prince of Conde intended to meet in the field on Tuesday next. Strype, An- nals, I. i. 545.] [2 See note 4, p. 127.] LXXI]I.] m.STIOP JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. lo7 LXXIII. BISHOP JEWEL TO P. MARTYR. [A. 51.] Salisbury, Aug. 14, 1562. Much health in Christ. I wrote to you, and also separately to Bullinger, immediately after Easter, and hope my letters have been received before now ; for as to the former letters which I sent to Frankfort at the March fair, and took care should be delivered to the younger Froschover, I doubt not but they have reached both yourself and my other friends ; yet Bullinger seems in his letter as if he were complaining somewhat of my neglect. Since then your letter dated Zurich, March 4th, has been brought to me ; and you may easily imagine, from my love and affection towards you, how agreeable and delightful it was. For although the subjects you wrote about were already old and almost out of date, (for that letter of yours could scarcely reach me before the 27th of June, out of breath, and weary with its journey,) nevertheless 1 seemed therein to recognize and hear your voice, and hold most delightful inter- course with you. I rejoice greatly, as I ought to do, that you re- turned safe and sound from France^ and that you retain your bodily strength and health. What you wrote me word, when you were in France, that you saw no appearance of an approaching war, and yet that matters could be settled in no other way, we now too truly see to have actually occurred. May the Lord God of hosts at length arise, and overthrow and scatter his enemies ; and inspire courage into our brethren, who worship him in holiness ! The duke of Guise is a powerful enemy, and being wary both from age and experience, seems to aim at nothing so much as to obtain a favourable opinion of his character. Therefore, some days since, messengers and letters were passing to and fro, together with honorary presents ; and fa- vour and popularity was courted by him in every possible way. By such pretences, forsooth, did he hope to deceive our sim- plicity. He did not however, gain his object with us ; for we have already enlisted our troops, armed our fleet, and are quite ready to afford our assistance whenever it may be wanted. All disaffected persons of any eminence or note among us are ordered to be kept in custody to prevent their doing mischief. I wish your rulers and commonwealth would at last rouse them- selves, and consider that the case is a common one ; that they also [3 Peter Martyr returned to Zurich from France, Nov. 21, 1561, as he •writes to Beza in a letter dated on the 25th of that month.] 158 BISHOP JEWEL TO P. MARTYK. [lET. may be involved, and that they should be cautious of gazing so long and so imconcernedly upon the proceedings of others. Matters are now in that state, that delay will neither restore them nor check then' progress. But what are your Dil selecti of Trent about? Are they suddenly struck dumb? holy fathers, and great lights of the world ! Not a single word in so long a time, even in seven- teen whole months! And yet the most holy [father] has long since expected his apotheosis, and thinks perhaps that they have done him an injury. Master Baldwin^ writes me word, that he is very much pleased with our moderation in the late change of religion, and that he will use his endeavom's, (for he thinks he has some influence,) that a like moderation may prevail in the kingdom of France ; but that your preciseness, as well as that of Geneva, is by no means agreeable to him. In this respect he is, I think, rather unjust to Calvin, probably from bearing in mind their ancient quarrel. Peter ^ Alexander is in London, laid up with the gout; a good man, but somewhat weakened by age. Your friend Herman is now with me. He has come over to us from France, because he perceived that his studies there were interrupted by those distur- bances to which he had heretofore been unaccustomed. Oh ! as often as we talk together about yourself, and BulHnger, your wife, your whole family, and all Zurich, how sweetly and with what pleasure do we converse ! His society is most agreeable to me ; for he is, as you well know, an excellent and well-principled young man, and one who is very much devoted to literature. Our affairs as to rehgion are going on well. The obstinacy of the papists is now greater than ever. They are depending, it seems, upon the result of events in France : we have heard nothing from that country these twenty days. There are a few other matters to write about ; but of them I write more fully to Bullinger, who, I see, reads my letters with avidity, and sadly complains to me of the interruption of them, occasioned however by no fault of mine. I send you ten French crowns, which I desire may be expended, at the discretion of your- [1 Francis Baldwin was Professor of Civil Law at Paris and elsewhere. He was appointed by the king of Navarre to bo his orator at the council of Trent; and was there in 1562, when his joatron was killed at the siege of Rouen. His quarrel with Calvin arose from his having introduced into Prance a work, published at fii-st anonymously, by George Cassander, on the duty of a christian man with respect to differences in religion ; and for which lie was attacked by Calvm, as the reputed author. He died in 1572. See Moreri.] [2 See p. 102, n. 1.] LXXIII.] BISHOP JEWEL TO P. MARTYE. 159 self and Bullinger, upon a public supper in your common-hall, to which may be invited, as usual, the ministers of the churches, and young students, and any others whom you may think fit. I send my Julius the twenty French crowns, which I promised him annu- ally, when he was in England ; besides eight crowns, and I know not how many batzen^ besides, making in all fifty English shillings, which I squeezed with difficulty from Ann's father-in-law. Farewell, my father and much esteemed master in Christ. Salute, I pray you, in my name that excellent woman your wife, Bullinger, Gualter, Lavater, Simler, AVolfius, Zuinglius, Gesner, Wickius, Haller, Frisius, Franciscus, and the dear boy ]Martyrillus. Salisbury, Aug. 14, 1562. Your most devoted, John Jewel, Anghis. LXXIV. BISHOP JEWEL TO J. SIMLER. [A. 52.] Salisbury, Aug. 18, 1562. Your Herman, my Josiah, is at last become mine ; yes, mine altogether, both by acquisition and possession. How so? you will exclaim. I will tell you. By the rising of the waters ; for he reached Salisbury on the 8th of July, having escaped with difficulty from the tumults in France. Oh ! how often do we converse with each other about the state of the republic of Zurich, and especially about our friend Josiah ! I have now the entire benefit of those delightful conversations, which, to say the truth, I rather envied you the enjoyment of. And if you were now with us, nothing could be more pleasant, or more to be desired by me, provided only you would leave that gout of yours at home. Believe me, my Josiah, although your griefs are, and ought to be, a grief to me, yet when I sometimes think about you, and place you, as it were, before my eyes, I see a wrinkled old man, bowed down, with bent body, leaning on crutches, dragging one foot after the other, and deli- cately treading on the ground. But I am not a little surprised that the gout can lay hold upon you, as you have always been a brisk and active young man, while that old lady is so indolent and sedentary. The queen of Scotland, niece of the duke of Guise, has within these few days, by way of courting the favour and friendship of our queen, sent her a most splendid and valuable diamond, inclosed and fixed in a plate of gold, and set off with some flattering and [3 A batz is somewhere about the vakie of twopence.] 1 GO BISHOP JEWEL TO J. SIMI.ER. [lET. elegant verses. I send you a copy of them, that you may know the truth of that saying, attributed, if I remember right, to Louis XI. He tvho knoivs not hoiv to dissemble, knows not hoiu to govern. Farewell, my Josiah, farewell. Salute most dutifully in my name your most excellent wife, masters Gualter, Wolfius, Zuinglius, Haller, Wickius, Frisius, Guldebeckius. Herman salutes you. Salisbury, Aug. 18, 1562. Yours in Christ, John Jewel, Anglus. LXXV. BISHOP PARKHURST TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 63.] LuDHAM, Aug, 20, 1562. I RECEIVED your letter, written June 22nd, about the beginning of August. There has been a little book published here, entitled " an apology for the church of England ;" in which it is shewn, why we have gone over from the pope to Christ, and why we re- fuse to acknowledge the council of Trent. It may be that two books have been published, but I have only seen this one. I ordered my servant to inquire in London for one or both, if there are two, and to give them in charge to Birkman, to be sent over to Froschover at the approaching fair. Our London friends seem to forget their duty, in not sending over to you books of this kind. Unless the archbishop of Canterbury had sent me a copy, I should not have seen it even now. There is in my diocese, in Norfolk, a venerable old man, an excellent preacher, and an ancient enemy of antichrist. The opinion of Brentius fell into his hands, which when he had read, he embraced with both hands, and even strenuously and obstinately defended it against some pious and learned men. When this came to my ears, I sent him the copy of your answer which you had presented me with ; which when he had attentively perused, he re- turned to me with many thanks, first to you for having published such a work, and then to myself for having lent it to him for some days : for he has now bade farewell to the opinion of Brentius, and through your instrumentality, has embraced the truth. He is, I believe, nearly ninety years old ; I have never seen him, for he lives a great way off, and is quite unable to ride, and indeed scarce able to walk. He preaches constantly in the church of which he is rector. If you would reduce your discourses on Jeremiah to a single volume, you would, in my opinion, do a service. I have Avritten to our friend Gualter about the queen's fleet and LXXV.] BISHOP PARKHUR8T TO H. BULLINGER. 161 the English troops ; and also, about the letter which poor Burcher wrote to me. I received a letter from my lord of Canterbury four days ago ; the substance of it is this, that I should diligently ascer- tain by every means in my power, though secretly, who, and how many there are in my diocese, who do not comply with the true rehgion. This is, I suspect, with the intention of punishing their breach of faith. I shall carefully attend to this, and shall give every intelligence, as soon as possible, concerning the enemies of Christ. This step is very gratifying to me ; for I gather from it that his grace of Canterbury intends firmly to support the true religion. May the Lord grant it ! Salute in my name your excellent wife, sons, daughters, daugh- ters-in-law, sons-in-law, and all your connections ; Haller, Wolfius, Frisius, CoUin, Wickius, Pellican, Meyer, the Froschovers, &c. My wife salutes you all. After I had written this, lo ! good news was brought me, namely, that the crucifix and candlesticks in the queen's chapel are broken in pieces, and, as some one has brought word, reduced to ashes. A good riddance of such a cross as that ! It has continued there too long already, to the great grief of the godly, and the cherishing of I know not what expectations in the papists. More- over, the pseudo -bishops, who are in the Tower of London, will very soon render an account of their breach of faith. So I hear. Fare- well, my good Bullinger. In haste. Ludham, Aug. 20, 1562. Yours, John Parkhurst, [Bishop] of JN'orwich. LXXVI. P. MARTYR TO BISHOP JEWELS [A. App. 1.] Dated at Zurich, Aug. 24, 15G2. By the favour of the bishop of London, most worthy prelate, and my ever-honoured lord, was brought hither a copy of your Apology for the church of England, the which had not been seen before cither by myself or any of our people. In your last letter indeed you rather gave an intimation of its intended appearance, than an express announcement of it. But so long was the journey hither, that it could not reach us till about the first of August ; [1 This Letter was written by Peter Martyr less than three months before his death, which took phice on Nov. 12, 1562. It is in reply to Letter LX., above.] 11 162 p. MARTYR TO BISHOP JEWEL. , [^^T. whereby you may figure to yourself how much loss we are con- tinually sustaining on account of the distance of places. As for the Apology, it hath not only in all points and respects satisfied me, (by whom all your writings are so wonderfully well liked and ap- proved,) but it appeared also to Bullinger, and his sons and sons- in-law, and also to Gualter and Wolfius, so wise, admirable, and eloquent, that they can make no end of commending it, and think that nothing in these days hath been set forth more perfectly. I exceedingly congratulate your talents upon this excellent fruit, the church upon this edifying of it, and England upon this honour ; and beseech you to proceed in the same way you have entered. For though we have a good cause, yet in comparison of the number of our enemies there are but few who defend it ; and they now seem so awakened, that by their goodness of style and crafty sophisms they much recommend themselves to the unlearned multi- tude. I speak of the Staphili, Hosii, and most other writers of the same stamp, who are at this time shewing themselves strenuous patrons of the pope's lies. Wherefore, since you have excited so great expectations of yourself in your most learned and elegant Apology, know for certain, that all good and learned men are assuring themselves that, while you are alive, the truth of the gospel will not be attacked by its enemies Avith impunity. And I rejoice most exceedmgly, that I have seen the day m which you are made the parent of so noble and elegant an offspring. May God our heavenly Father grant of his goodness, that you may often be honoured with the like fruit ! As to other things that you are doing yonder, I am as ignorant as a Parthian or Indian is of the affairs of Germany. But I per- suade myself that your affairs are in a flourishing, or at least in a tolerable condition, because we know from experience, that there is no messenger more swift than he who bring-s tidino-s of the aflflic- tions, calamities, and death of our friends ; while their happiness, joy, and prosperous condition is very much and for a long time kept from us. But however it be, we ought mutually to hope the best one of another, since it is most certain that God is continually and every where present, and this too after a gracious manner, unto those that be his, of which number are we. But as touching myself, if you desire to know more particu- larly how I do, understand that I am of a cheerful mind in Christ, and that I am occupied in the same labours in which I was engaged when you were here ; but in body I am not so strong and lusty as I was heretofore. For the burden of old age daily becomes more LXXVI.] P. MARTYR TO BISHOP JEWEL, 163 heavy. Now, for the space of a year and a half, I have been altogether toothless, neither hath my stomach performed its office of exciting me to eat with an appetite. I am troubled also with rheum ; in addition to which I have no small pain in my legs, by reason of two sores wherewith I am at times greatly tormented. Wherein though the body properly and by itself be afflicted, yet by reason of that connection between them which the Greeks call sympathy, the mind also cannot choose but be affected. These things, which I am sure for the good will you bear me you will be sorry to hear, I would by no means have inserted in this letter, had I not very great need of your prayers, which I have persuaded myself I shall obtain to be more earnest, because of the necessity wherewith I am urged. Respecting the French affairs I write nothing, as I feel assured that they are no less known to you than to myself. The Tridentine synod is feigning to make progress ; but it advances so slowly, that in these five sessions it hath decided nothing to the purpose. Its definitions are old and mouldy, so that they seem not to act the part of fathers, but of beetles, who are always turning over the self-same ordure of traditions. Farewell, most accomphshed prelate, and more than the half of my own soul. May God very long preserve, keep, and increase you with every good, both for the church and commonwealth! All friends and learned men salute you. Zurich, August 24, 1562. Lavater hath published his Commentary on the book of Proverbs. LXXVII. R. ASCHAM TO J. STURMIUS. [B. 40.] LoNDOK, Oct. 21, 15G2. Much health in Christ Jesus. As we are united together in the same zeal, opinion, disposition, and feeling, with respect to learning, religion, the commonwealth, and a mutual friendship, I often wish and desire that those who belong to us should in like manner be connected by some link and motive to cherish a like affection on their part. And therefore, as my wife has made me a father for the third time, about a week since, I have bestowed upon my little son, in perpetual remembrance of my fricndsliip, the name of Sturmius^ Ascham. I pray God, and shall daily continue to do \} A letter of Sturmius in reply to this is printed in his epistles, wherein 11—2 16i R. ASCII AiM TO J. STURMIUS. [lET. SO, that as he bears some resemblance of you in name, so he may likewise in your learning and virtue. I deliver him therefore to your fidehty as your own, and, as far as possible, commend him to your protection, although he is not connected with you by relation- ship or nation, but by liis very name and the wishes of his parents ; so that, in case of my death, you may regard him with the same tenderness, benevolence, and affection, with which you have here- tofore been always accustomed to regard his father. For respecting the probable shortness of my life I wrote very copiously with tears, and in far too mournful a strain, in that long letter^ of mine sent you last April by our friend Toxites. I am very anxious to know whether that letter has reached you. I wrote to you also by Henry Knolles", who is at this time envoy of our most serene queen to the German princes. From him (for he is very much attached to you) you will very readily understand the whole state of our affairs in England. Her most serene majesty is fully de- termined and in every respect entirely prepared to destroy the power and tyranny of the Guises, to take arms for the safety of the youthful king^, and in defence of an inoffensive people \ with- out any way intending any wrong to that king or that kingdom. he says : Ego Sturmii Aschami propater esse volo, et ille mihi profilius non futurus est, sed est. Mittam ei imaginem meam ; ut si moriar, antcquam me videat, post me aliquid mei videat. Stm-m. Ep. xvi.j [1 See above, Letter LXIV.] [2 " The last moncth (Sep. 1562) Mr Henry Knolles was sent into Ahnain with commission to join with Clu-istopher Mount, and to sollicit the prince's protestants both to aid the prince of Conde, and to consider how the common cause of religion might be defended against any common confederacy of the enemy." Sir W. Cecil to — . MS. Cotton. Vesp. c. vii. 224.] [3 Namely, Charles IX. who was at this time about 12 years old. He as- cended the throne Dec. 15, 1560, on the death of his brother Francis II. In the queen's declaration of the causes that induced her to take arms, it is ex- pressly stated that her majesty meaneth not " in any her actions to prejudice the crown of France, nor to do any other thing but that which shall stand with the honour of God, the preservation of the French king both in his per- son and his rights, the safeguard of the prince [of Conde] and his company, with all other the king's true subjects, against the manifest cruelty of the Duke of Guise and his complices." Forbes, ii. 73.] [4 " Nothing is meant here on our part to make any invasion, but to enter quietly into these pieces (Newhaven and Diejipe) which by law of arms we may, considering we take none of them by force ; and as long as the French shall give no other cause, it is meant to use no war towards them, but to allow of mutual traffic betwixt l)oth the nations " Cecil, as above. The letter was probal)ly addressed to Sir N. Throgmoiton.] LXXVll.] R. ASCIIAM TO J. STURMIUS. 165 On this very day, I believe, our troops have entered Normandy % Avhich you will sooner know by the report itself, than by this letter. I wish, my Sturmius, that you would write a separate history of this Guisian conspiracy. Not but that I am well aware, as that friend of ours says upon a like occasion, by what a weight of im- portant undertakings you are oppressed from day to day. But I am not less desirous of your reputation than of my own advantage. The subject is a noble one, and worthy of your learning, abilities, zeal for pure religion, love to that nation, affection for the cause itself, and indignation also against those who are the authors of such impious tyranny and atrocious cruelty. I have often read, and shall always remember, that remarkable passage in a letter of yours to Erasmus*^, your bishop of Strasburgh, in which you treat upon the proper method of writing liistory. When I consider the ability which that passage proves you to possess, I cannot tell you how greatly I despise all other writers, and earnestly pray Almighty God that you may sometime or other undertake such an employ- ment. This desire of mine has been greatly modified by a report brought over here from Germany, that the German princes had assigned you the province of continuing with your pen what had been passed over by your friend John Sleidan. I have positively stated to our queen that this is the case ; let me know, I pray you, whether it is so. I long to know about your Aristotle's Rhetoric, and your treatises, both that against Staphylus, and that upon the Lord's supper, as well as about your other studies and pursuits. Our friend Hales is in the country. I have written to him to-day. Cook is also in the country. Cecil nobly sustains the description [5 Part of the English army, under Sir Adrian Poynings, arrived at New- haven in September : the earl of Warwick, who was commander in chief, did not arrive there till towards the end of October. In a letter to Cecil, dated from Dover, Oct. 25th, ho writes : " Once again upon very small occasion I went to sea on Friday at night, the wind coming then suddenly, after a little shower, to the north. Notwithstanding it continued not two hom's before it came to the south again, yet we laboured all that night, and the next day so long, as we were past hope either to get Newhavon or Portsmouth, and there- fore forced to return hither again, where I landed late yesternight, and so must tarry until it please Him to give leave, to whom the greatest princes in this case must obey; wherein, I trust, there shall be found no slackness on my behalf." Forbes, ii. 142.] [6 Erasmus, bishop of Strasburgh, had been a pupil of Sturmius, whom ho placed at the head of the college in that city. He was one of the bishops as- sembled at the council of Trent, and died in 1568. Moreri.J 166 R. ASCHAM TO J. STUBMIUS. [lET. given at the beginning of Horace's second epistle', by his zeal, ability, prudence, and firmness, with great credit to himself, and advantage to our own countrymen, and, as I hope, for the welfare of other nations. As to myself, I was never, thank God, in greater favour with our most serene queen, than I am at present. She reads some- thing either in Greek or Latin with me every day. My wife salutes you and yours. Farewell in Christ. London, Oct. 21, 1562. Your most attached, R. Ascham. LXXVIII, BISHOP JEWEL TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 54.] London, March 5, 1563. Much health. Though grief for Peter ^ Martyr is unavailing, yet there is something pleasant, I know not why, even in the very feeling of sorrow. Alas ! he was one who, from the greatness of his talents, the variety of his attainments, his piety, his morals, his life, seemed worthy of never being taken away from us. But I had long before suspected this would be the case, when I first heard of a man of his age turning his thoughts to marriage. May our great and good God mercifully look upon his church, and raise up for her other defenders in the room of the departed ! Ye are few, my father, ye are but few, upon whom the whole matter rests ; and I have always reckoned yourself among the foremost. Oh that there may always be some, to whom you may^ be able to transfer your duties with satisfaction ! But to pass over these things, I do not wonder that your Hercules'* of Tubingen, the forger, but not the subduer of monstrosities, is now triumphing at his ease : I wonder whether he is able to confine himself within the ample limits and regions of his Ubiquitarian kingdom. Should he make any attack upon our departed friend, and his writings come to my knowledge, [^ Cum tot sustineas et tanta ncgotia solus. Res Italas armis tuteris, moribus ornes, Legibus emendes, &c. Hov. Ep. 11. 1. 1.] ['-i Peter Martyr died Nov. 12, 1562, in tlic sixty-third year of his age.] [3 Quibiis possitis hanc lampadem committere. A metaphorical expression, borrowed from the custom of running with lighted torches at the feast of Prometheus at Athens, which they passed on from one to another till they reached tlie goal. See Lucrct. ii. 77. Pers. Sat. vi. 61.] [< Brcntius. See note 2, p. 139.] LXXVni.] BlJiHOl' JEWEL TO H. BULLINGER. 167 unless some of you should be beforehand with me, I shall think it my duty to reply to him, as far as my engagements will permit ; if for no other reason, at least to let the world know, that England and Switzerland are both united against these Ubiquitarians. The death of the Guisian^ Pharaoh, which I have to-day heard as an ascertained and undoubted fact, has, believe me, affected my inmost heart and soul. It was so sudden, so opportune, so fortu- nate, and so far exceeding all our hopes and expectations. What spirits must we now suppose our brethren to possess, whom that monster had already closely besieged, and whom in hope and imagi- nation he had already almost devoured with his cruel jaws? Bless- ed be the name of the Lord ! Chatillon^ is now besieging the castle of Caen, and is daily gaining strength ; and there is good hope that the enemy will come into our terms, and that all will end as we wish. Our queen is collecting troops from Germany, and keeps them in her pay, regardless of expense. We are now assembling the great council of the nation, and are going on successfully both as to the affairs of religion, and of state, and also with respect to the sinews of war, namely, money". We have very favourable accounts from Scotland. The queen, almost alone, retains both her Guisian obstinacy, and her mass, against the general wish. Our queen last autumn was taken ill of the small pox, and in some danger ; she had almost lost her life through her impatience of the fever, and the wearisomeness [of the disease.] But we thank God, who has delivered her from danger and us from fear. We hear nothing about what your little Tri- dentiiie fathers, and the dropsical pope, are bringing forth. Perhaps the Holy Spii"it declines being present, or cannot speak. Whatever may be the reason, it is strange, that in so numerous an assembly, and so great expectation, nothing is accomplished. I am at last beginning to recover my health, after the un- [^ Fi'ancis of Lorraine, duko of Guise and Aumale, was killed by a pistol- shot, Feb. 24, 1563, while preparing to besiege the city of Orleans, the strong hold of the protcstants in France.] [•5 The admiral de Coligny. The castle surrendered on the 2nd of March.] [7 This parliament made sundry laws for relief of the poor, for navigation, and husbandi-y, agaiiist rogues, cheaters, conjurors, porjurod persons ; and for translating the Bible and Common Prayer into Welch ; and against ad- vancing the pope's authority, which is made treason, and refusal of the oath of supremacy. And subsidies were granted ; by the ecclesiastical men one subsidy, and by the laity another, Avith two fifteenths and tenths. Whitlocke's Memorials, p. 230, and Camden's Elizabeth, p. 63.] 168 BISHOP JEWEL TO H. liULLINGER. [lET. seasonable weather of the last summer and this winter, and the spasms and cough which lasted for some days. I doubt not, you will take care that the writings of Peter Martyr be not lost : they cost their author much labour, and deserve, as you know, to be highly esteemed. Farewell, most accomplished Sir, and much esteemed brother and master in Christ. Salute in my name that excellent lady your wife, your sons, daughters-in-law, masters Gualter, Simler, Lavater, ZuingUus, Wickius, Wolfius, Haller, Gesner, Frisius. May the Lord long preserve you to us safe and sound ! London, March 5, 1563. Your brother in Christ, and most attached, John Jewel. LXXIX. H. FOLKERZHEIMER TO J. SIMLER. [B. 41.] London, March 15, 1503. Though your account, my very dear Josiah, of the great pro- ductiveness of the grafts that I inserted, is very gratifying of itself, and I rejoice that I am able at least to be of some use in this humble science and art ; yet your friendly exhortation that I should marry on this account, is far more agreeable. Influenced indeed by the bland invitation of nature herself, and by the opinion of both my parents, I do not feel a very great aversion to your advice. But men's constant and daily complaints about their wives, in which they accuse them of being the causes of every thing that is dis- agreeable, troublesome, and wearisome in life, may well bo a warn- ing even to the most favourably disposed, and divert him from his purpose. Like M. Titurius therefore, who, when he had nothing to do, threw himself on the grass by way of recreation, and said, / wish this ivere working; so it comes into my mind, whenever I sail, or drive, or ride, to wish that this were managing one's house- hold, and performing the duty of a good head of a family. Impor- tuned as I have been by so many letters from my parents and friends, I should have returned home long since, had not the singular regard of the bishop of Salisbury towards me compelled me to ask for a longer leave of absence. And I am deriving this advantage from my being from home, that, seeing our house is frequented by men of the first rank, I am daily hearing their grave conversation, not, forsooth, about regulations respecting light', or laws about the [1 Servitutes luminum. This means, in the Roman law, the duty of a man LXXIX.] H. l-OLKEKZHELMER TO J. SIMLER. 169 eaves of houses, but about fortifications, tolls, safe conduct, the im- portation or exportation of merchandise, and other things of the like kind. But why, my Josiah, need I tell you any more of these things ? Two most honourable and excellent men, the bishops of Sahsbury and Worcester, are contending with each other in their regard and love for me. The bishop of Worcester has lately pre- sented me with a beautiful and valuable horse, and most lovingly invites me to visit him as soon as I can. I have resolved not to write any thing about master Peter Martyr, for this reason, that I am so affected by the loss of that man, that it seems very difficult to me to make mention of him either in conversation or even by letter without tears. Oh ! that 5th of February, when, with our horses tired out as well as our- selves, we hastened up to London to the meeting of parliament! Oh ! how sad, how mournful did that day prove to us, which an- nounced the death, or rather the removal and departure, but yet too long, of so great a man^ ! But there are many things which may afford us comfort, and diminish our grief and lamentation. And among the rest, if the death of those persons is glorious, and by no means to be deplored, who, as one^ says, have either per- formed actions worthy of being written, or written things worthy of being performed ; we certainly do not regard with sufficient gratitude the exertions and studies of master Martyr, by which he attained unto both these excellences, if we continue to bewail liis death with so much grief and anxiety, as though he had departed before his time. These and the like topics may be better imagined than described by us both, although more fully by yourself. I am wonderfully taken, as you have before learned from my letter, with the pursuit of history and antiquity, but yet so as by no means to forsake those studies which you know I have followed for some years. During the last months, for the sake of improve- ment, I have translated into Latin, in as fitting and appropriate language as I could. Flavins Arrian's Periplus of the Red sea and the Euxine. And because it was somewhat obscure, I think I have thrown some light upon it by commentaries, that is, passages taken from the ancient annals and writings of geographers. I have more- over described the lied sea, the Persian gulph, that of Cambay, the to allow his neighbour to make openings in his premises, as in a common wall, for instance, to get light. See Cic. de Orat. l. 38.] [2 Peter Martyr died Nov. 12, 1562.] [3 Pliny. Quibus deorum muncre datum est aut facerc scribcnda, aut scribere loiionda.] 170 H. roLKERZHEIMER TO J. SliMLER. [lET. bay of Bengal, with the inland parts of Arabia, Persia, and hither India as far as the Ganges, I followed in this, first of all, the measurement of Ptolemy, and then those which are so laid down by other geographers and by history, as to be capable of being reduced to a careful and accurate determination of longitude and latitude. Farewell, my dear friend, and commend Avith me to our God the affairs of France. Salute, I pray you, your wife, also the Bullingers, father and sons, Lavater, Gesner, Julius, Pellican, Zuinglius, Haller, Funckius, Gualter, Guldebeckius, the Collins''s, and all who know me. Farewell. London, March 15, 1563. Pardon this haste, my Josiah, I pray you, and, if you think proper, salute M. M. Herman Folrerziieimer. LXXX. BISHOP JEWEL TO J. SIMLER. [A. 56.] London, March 23, 1563. I HAVE at all times, most learned Josiah, duly appreciated your kindness and courtesy and affection. For who could do otherwise than love one of such a disposition, so courteous, so learned, so mindful of an old friend, in a word, so amiable ? But when my regard for you seemed incapable of increase, your deserts have nevertheless produced this effect, that I daily seem to feel that if what is now most great could become more so, I should love you yet more than I now do. I have received from you a silver medal of that excellent old man Pe'Rcr Martyr, with an account of his life and death. In the figure indeed, although there is in many respects an admirable re- semblance (to the original), yet there was a something, I know not what, in which I was unable to perceive the skill of the artist. And what wonder is it, that there should be some defect in producing the likeness of one, the like of whom, whenever I look around me, I can scarce believe ever to have existed? Your little book, how- ever, I perused with the greatest eagerness and delight. For I seemed to myself to behold the same old man with Avhom I had formerly lived upon such affectionate terms ; and to behold him too, I know not why, more nearly and thoroughly, than when we were living together. You have refuted that obscure and insolent rcvilcr, Stancarus', [1 He w;is professor of Hebrew at Cracow, and afterwards at Konigsberg; and maintained that our Lord was mediate)' between God and man in his LXXX.] BISHOP JEWEL TO J. SIMLEK. I7l (whose very existence I was ignorant of,) both skilfully and learn- edly, and, as I hope, with great advantage to the church. But, my Josiah, I am sparing in writing to you, especially when concerning yourself. For it is neither consistent with my friendship nor my modesty, to utter these things in your ears. I have read this work'' with the greatest eagerness, as I do all your writings ; for they are written most copiously on barren subjects, and most clearly on obscure ones. I acknowledge and confess your kindness, and own myself, moreover, in your debt. Our church, by the blessing of God, is free from these mon- sters. We have only to do with some of the popish satelhtes, who are giving us as much disturbance as they can in their corners and hiding places ; and even at this moment are preventing me from throwing together what I had meditated against the Ubiquitarians : but on this subject I have written more fully to Bullinger. Should you publish the writings of Peter Martyr, you will both confer a benefit on the church, and satisfy the expectation of many good men who desire it. As to the Commentaries on Genesis, respecting which you seem to require my opinion, indeed, my Josiah, I have never read them. I doubt not, however, that they are such, as Avhen published, will be acknowledged to be the work of Peter Martyr. Whatever news I had to relate, I have thrown together in my letter to master Bullinger. Were not your Rhine so much in the way, I should both write and send to you much more frequently. But the journey is long, and besides I can scarce find any one who is going thither at this next fair ; added to which, I am uncertain as to the fair itself. But, whatever may become of my letter, whether I write, or am silent, I am, my Josiah, wholly yours. [London] March 23, 1563. Salute, &c. John Jewel. human nature alone. Ho was opposed by Osiander, Calvin, Bullinger and Melancthon. See Bayle, who says of him that '"il versait des torrens d'injm-es dans les ecrits qu'il composait centre ses antagonistes; et il s'excusait de cela sur le droit do ropresaillos, et sur rimportance des heresies qu'il croiait com- battre, et memo sur I'examplo des apotres." He died in 1574.] [2 The work here referred to was a confutation of a book written by Stancarus, and entitled, "Do Trinitate, et Mediatore Domino nostro Jesu Christo, adversus Ilcnricum Bullingerum, Petinim Martyrem, ct Joannem Calvinum, ct reliquos Tigurinsc ac Genevcnsis ccclesipo ministros, ecclesise Dei perturbatores, etc. Basle, 1547."] 172 UISIIOP PAKKIIL'KST TO H. IJULLINGKR. [n LXXXI. BISHOP PARKHURST TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 57.] LuDHAM, April 2C}, 1563- WiiEN I was in London, I rebuked those of my countrymen who had been at Zurich, for having been so unmindful of you as never to write to you. Some were ashamed of their long silence, and some hkewise expressed their sorrow. But I hope they have now written, and that they will write more diligently in future. Foxe has written a large volume on the Enghsh Martyrs', and that too in Enghsh ; it was published four days before Easter. The papists themselves are now beginning to be disgusted with the cruelty of their leaders. Six or seven persons were convicted of treason, and condemned to death at the beginning of Lent ; but the queen's mercy still suffers them to remain in the Tower of London. Two of them bear the name of Pole'^, being relatives of Cardinal Pole. The Earl of Huntley, one of the principal noblemen in Scotland, and a notorious papist, influenced by the counsel of Guise, was purposing to pour forth the blood of the godly in Scotland, just as Guise did in France ; and there was a great conspiracy of many seditious per- sons, and the same tumult and bloodshed would certainly have taken place in Scotland as in France, had not the design, by God's blessing, been discovered in time. Some were slain in battle^, among whom was one of the sons of Huntley ; the other son was condemned with some others. Huntlev himself was beino; taken to prison ; but in his way thither he fell backwards from his horse, [1 Parkhurst here refers to the well-known work, Foxe's Acts and Monu- ments, the first edition of which was j^ubhshed about five weeks previous to the date of this letter. It is unnecessary here to add any particulars respect- ing that laborious woik. Strypc has given some interesting information respecting it. Annals i. i. 374.] [2 Arthur Pole, Edmonde Pole, Anthonye Fortoscue, John Prestall, Ilumfrcy Barwycko, Edwai'd Cosyn, and others, seven in all, were condemned on the 26th of February. Their treasons were intentions to come with a power into Wales, and to proclaim the Scottish queen. Both the ambassa- dors of Franco and Spain were concerned in the matter. Strype, Annals, I. i. 546, 555. Camden, Elizabeth, p. 58.] [3 At Corrichie, near Aberdeen, where Huntley was defeated by the carl of Mm'ray. His sons, John and Adam Goi'don, were made prisoners ; the former was executed, the latter pardoned on account of his tender age. By their confession, it appears, that he intended high treason to the queen of Scots. See a letter from Cecil to Sir Thomas Smith, dated Nov. 17, 1562. MS. Lansdown, 102, 20.] LXXXI.] nSHOP PAnKJHinST TO H. BULLINGER. 173 and died of a broken neck. It is doubtful whether tliis was done by accident or on purpose, I wrote you word that the cross, wax candles, and candlesticks had been removed from the queen's chapel ; but they were shortly after brought back again, to the great grief of the godly. The candles heretofore were lighted every day, but now not at all. The lukewarmness of some persons very much retards the progress of the gospel, I wish well from my heart to all the people of Zurich, whom I beg you to salute in my name, and especially your excel- lent wife, sons, daughters, &c. My wife salutes you all. In haste. Ludham, April 26, 1563. Yours, John Parkhurst, [Bishop] of Norwich. LXXXII. BISHOP GRINDAL TO J. CALVIN*. [B. 42.] London, June 19, 1563. We are much indebted, most illustrious master Calvin, to your piety, and also to your whole church, for having so long afforded us the services of the most learned master Gallasius^ ; who has not only left to his successor, master Cousins, in a state of quietness and good order, the church which he found at his coming in a most disturbed condition, but has also by his advice and prudence been of great use both to myself and our churches. I should not indeed have willingly let him go, had he not had a better reason for leaving us than we could wish. Our climate, it seems, does not agree with his constitution, and has greatly injured his health, besides depriving him of a beloved wife, (to say nothing of his children ;) so that him whom we now send back as an invalid, there would be reason to fear, if he remained among us another winter, that we should not send back at all. It was therefore of the first importance for him to return to his native air for the recovery of his health : and we desire nothing more earnestly than that you niay, each of you, be enabled freely to preach the gospel in your common country. Although, in the present state of things, partly through the delay or rather tardiness of some parties, and partly through the over hasty conduct of others, (to use no severer term,) there seems but little hope of this ; yet I doubt not but that God [4 The original of this letter is preserved at Geneva.] [5 See above, Letter LII. p. lOG. Gallasius became, in 1564, minister of the church at Orleans ; and publislied, in 1570, at Geneva, an edition of Irenseus.] 174 BISHOP GUINDAL TO J. CALVIN. [lET. himself, by means unknown to us, that we may not glory in men, will bring the whole matter to a happy issue. I grieve from my heart that at your age, and with so slender a frame, you have been . attacked, as Gallasius informs me, with a fit of the gout. I have no doubt but that you have contracted this disorder by excessive study and exertion. Henceforth therefore, you must relax somewhat of your former labours and unseasonable lucubrations, lest, by not sparing yourself, you greatly increase your disease, and become of less benefit to the church. Think of Nazianzeno, who, because he did not, when advanced in years, relax at all from that austerity which he practised in early life, was almost constantly obhged to keep his bed, and on that account was rendered less useful to the church. As you and Bulhnger are almost the only chief pillars remaining, we desire to enjoy you both (if it please God) as long as possible. I purposely omit mention of Brentius, who, having undertaken the advocacy of the very worst of causes, seems no lono;er to acknowledo-e us as brethren. Master Gallasius, who brings you this letter, can give you the best information of the state of our kingdom and church ; so that I have at this time no occasion to write upon these subjects. Salute, I pray you, in my name, master Beza and your other colleagues ; as also master Antony^ the professor of Hebrew. May the Lord Jesus very long preserve your piety in safety to us and to his church ! London, June 19, 1563. Your most devoted in the Lord, Edmund Grind al, Bishop of London. LXXXIII. T. SAMPSON TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 58.] Oxford, July 26, 1563. I WISH you, reverend Bulhnger, eternal life in Christ our Lord. You will perhaps wonder at my freedom in troubling you with this letter. Excuse me, I will write very briefly. [1 Antony Rodolph Chevalier was a learned French protestant, and teacher of that language to the princess Elizabeth. On the death of Edward VI. he retired into Germany, and was made Hebrew professor at Strasburgh. He succeeded Tremellius (whose daughter-in-law he married) as Regius Professor of Hebrew at Cambridge in 1569, upon the recommendation of archbishop Parker; and was also appointed to a prebend at Canterbury. He died in Guernsey in 1572. See Strype, Annals, i. ii. 552.] LXXXni.] T. SAMPSON TO H. BULLINGER, 17-5 There was one, not long since, at Zurich, into whose bosom I could pour out all my cares. His remains are now with you. Zurich therefore often comes into my mind. But to what purpose should I idly prate of my thoughts at such times ? Martyr is yet alive : may Zurich live well and happy ! and that the remembrance of the kindness I received at Zurich may not be buried with Peter Martyr, is the object of my now addressing you. I had once a little cot- tage at Zurich ; and if God would now grant my wishes, I should most anxiously return to it. I am perhaps selfish in desiring this : I do not deny it. But since the glory of Christ our Lord should be the supreme object of our desire, I wave all my petitions as far as they regard myself. In this matter therefore, namely, in looking out for me a small lodging, I am loth to give you any farther trouble. Oh that we may sometime be permitted to arrive at those mansions prepared for us in heaven by Christ our Lord ! Mean- while, most reverend father, I commend both my country and myself to your prayers. The affairs of England are in a most un- happy state; I apprehend yet worse evils, not to say the worst: but we must meanwhile serve the Lord Christ. Happy is he whom our Christ adopts into his family ! Consider, then, that England is most earnestly commended to your prayers, and remember me also. As a lasting token of my regard, I send you by your countryman, master Blaarer, some Oxford gloves. They indeed will groAv old ; but may your love of England and of myself never grow old I Farewell, and may you, my very dear father, live most happy in the Lord! Oxford, July 26, 1563. Yours, Tho. Sampson. Salute Julius Tcrentianus in my name and in that of mv wife. LXXXIV. BISHOP PARKHURST TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 59.] LuDHAM, Aug. 13, 1563. Health to you in Christ, most learned Bullinger. I wrote you a letter on the 26th of April, which I hope you received : yours, however, written on the 6th of March was delivered to me on the 23rd of May ; but I have not received the copy of your second reply to Brentius, which you write of. What do I not im- precate against those men who have robbed me of so great a treasure! If you had tied it up with the letters of Gualter, Lava- ter, and Simler, it would have reached me in safety. I have not 176 BISHOP PARKHURSr TO H. HULLIXGKR. [lET. yet seen any thing that Brentius has written, cither against your- self or Peter Martyr ; nor do I much regard any writings or trash of that kind. Your letter written October 16, 1562, I did not receive till the 27th of June. Hyperius sent it to Luncher, and Luncher to me. I have not seen him of a long time, but I sent some money to him on the 4th of July, and I inclose you his letter to me, by which you will learn how harsh and inexorable are the heads of his col- lege, who will not allow him any leave of absence. Within these few days there has come to me a young Scotsman, a most excellent preacher, recommended to me by letter from Grindal, bishop of London, and Coverdale, late bishop of Exeter. He is now settled in my diocese, namely, in a sea-port called Lynn. He has brought me news from Scotland, that the archbishop^ of St Andrew's has been condemned to death for hearing mass ; and that two or three of the nobility have been imprisoned for the same reason. They have decreed in parliament that adultery shall be punished with death. The Queen of Scotland demanded in the house of parliament these three things: 1, That she might be allowed to hear mass; 2, that she might declare war against the English ; 3, that the German, (viz. the popish) guards might be about the court, to whom should be committed the charge of her person. But none of these requests were complied with. These things he told me. There was a violent thunder-storm here about the beginning of July. The spire of the cathedral church in the city of Norwich was violently shaken, though not thrown down ; but it was repaired shortly after. The plague is raging in London" and at Newhaven'^, and, as it is reported, in the French army. You will hear every thing else from my letter to Gualter. On the 20th of July I sent by one of my principal attendants a letter to the council. On the 26th of the same month he brought their answer, and died of the [1 Mui-ray cast the archbishop of St Andrew's into prison, because he had not abstained from celebrating mass, for which he hardly obtained pardon with many tears. Camden, Elizabeth, p. 68.] [2 Out of the city of London alone, which consisteth of a hundred and twenty-one parishes, there were carried forth to burying about 21,530 corpses. Camden, Elizabeth, p. 07.] [3 Now Havre de Grace, till then occupied by the English, but surren- dered in July by reason of the plague here mentioned, Avhich was brought into England, and the latter end of August raged in London, about a thousand in a week dying. Strype, Annals, i. ii. 94.] LXXXIV.] BISHOP PARKHURST TO H. BULLINGER. lY7 plague four days after. The Lord have mercy upon us ! About the beginning of August war was publicly declared against France*. Salute in my name the most honourable lady your wife, also your sons and daughters, learned friends, and most courteous citizens, whom you know me to be acquainted with. In haste. Ludham, August 13, 1563. My wife salutes you all, and thanks you for your letter. As no one is at hand who understands Ger- man, she is unable to reply to you, which she very much regrets. Yours, John Parkhurst, [Bishop] of Norwich. I hear that peace '^ is about to be made between the French and ourselves. God grant it ! I know for certain that a truce has been established for some time. My wife sends you two pair of boots, which you may wear when rude Boreas rushes down from the Aar, bringing cold, frost, and snow. LXXXV. L. HUMPHREY TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 60.] Oxford, August 16, 1563. Health in Christ, and everlasting peace ! . I rejoice and con- gratulate you again and again that the tumult of war has subsided. I lament, however that the affairs of religion have made so little progress. Jesus will at length afford us halcyon days, when the gospel shall meet with more acceptance, and the church, I hope, will have her sons, and the gospel its course, in spite of, and with the opposition of, all the powers of hell. For the truth will prevail, and no power or cunning of man shall be able to resist the divine will and operation. But to you and yours, our fathers and brethren, do we wish a long life, lest the christian commonwealth should be deprived of her parents, and patrons, and guardians. Respecting the subject of the habits, I wish you would again write me your opinion, either at length, or briefly, or in one word: [■* Sir Nicolas Tbrogmorton, the queen's ambassador in France, was put under restraint; and the queen, to be even with the French for this injurious deahng with her ambassador, lodged the French ambassador at Eton, in Sir Thomas Smith's old lodgings, very commodiously, but under restraint. Strype, Annals, i. ii. 94.] [•5 This peace "was proclaymed in London the 22d [of April, 1564], and on the 23d a notable good sermon made at Pooles [St Paul's] with Te Deum and all incident solemnities." Cecil to Sir Thomas Smith, MS. Lansd. 102. 49. and see Strype, Annals, i. ii. 115. The articles are recorded by Camden, Elizabeth, p. 70.] 12 178 L. HUMPHREY TO H. BULLINGER. [lET. first, whether that appears to you as indifferent which has been so long established with so much superstition, and both fascinated the minds of the simple with its splendour, and imbued them with an opinion of its religion and sanctity : secondly, whether at the com- mand of the sovereign, (the jurisdiction of the pope having been abolished,) and for the sake of order, and not of ornament, habits of this kind may be worn in church by pious men, lawfully and with a safe conscience. I am speaking of that round cap and popish surplice, which are now enjoined us, not by the unlawful tyranny of the pope, but by the just and legitimate authority of the queen. To the pure, then, can all these things be pure, and matters of in- difference? I ask your reverence to let me know very exactly what is your opinion. Sampson had sent his letter by another hand. He salutes you and master Gualter and the rest again and again. May the Lord preserve your church and his ! Oxford, August 16, 1563. Yours, Laurence Humphrey. LXXXVI. H. ZANCHIUS^ TO BISHOP GRINDAL. [B. 43.] Strasburgh, before Aug. 23, 15(i3. Excuse my delay, honoured sir ; for I have but lately returned from the borders of Italy, and have found an almost infinite number of letters, to which I must necessarily reply. You desire to know how our dispute is settled. I will tell you in few words. Our senators, as I hear and see, had determined from the very first so to conduct themselves in this controversy of ours, that the honour of each party should remain as far as possible inviolate ; and this for the sake of the office, both of the preachers in the church, and mine in the school. Although therefore during those two years in which the cause was being pleaded before the senate, they were well aware, both from the reading of the charges, the writings of each party, and the opinions of many churches and universities respecting my theses", that the action brought against me by my adversaries was most unjust, and that my doctrine, which had been charged with and condemned for both novelty and heresy, was [' Grindal's reply to this letter is printed in his Remains, published by the Parker Society, p. 276.] [2 Tliese theses contained the declaration of Zanchy's faith conccrninj; predestination, final persever.ance, and the Lord's supper.] LXXXVI.j H. ZANCHIUS TO BISHOP GRINDAL. 179 neither novel nor heretical ; they nevertheless refused to decide upon the case, or at least, to permit it to be decided by a disputa- tion ; but having sent for four divines^ and some canonists, partly from Tubingen, partly from Deux-Ponts, partly from Basle, they resolved that the dispute should be settled by these parties. They, in the presence of four senators, read over the pleadings and writings upon each side ; they clearly perceived that great injustice had been done both to myself and to the truth ; they reported to the senate their opinion both of the writings and pleadings. Here master Peter Sturmius, the head schoolmaster, said before them all, " What now then becomes of the numerous and grievous heresies which were objected to Zanchius?" They then made proposals separately to each party to come to an agreement. When the referees came to me, they first of all stated in express terms that the opposite party held the same opinion with myself concerning the predestination of the saints ; for that they approved the doctrine of Augustine, Luther and Bucer ; and by these three, next to the scriptures, I had most copiously con- firmed the whole of what I teach in my lectures and expositions. There only now remained some difi'erence of opinion respecting the Lord's supper. Although therefore they had read my confession respecting the supper, yet they were nevertheless anxious to hear more clearly from myself what I thought about the real presence of Christ therein : for in my confession 1 had offered no opinion upon the subject, but had only discussed three principal heads ; first, that not only the symbols were received, but also the thing itself, the real body of Christ, and his real blood, that is, Christ himself; secondly, that each was eaten and drunk, not with the mouth of the body but of the spirit, namely, by faith ; thirdly, and this only by the faithful. To this I answered, that I was unwilling to dis- pute upon the question, because I could not find a single positive declaration in the scriptures respecting the presence of Christ in the supper ; but nevertheless, that they might not think that I shrunk from the subject, and dared not explain my opinion upon this question, I would tell them my sentiments. First, that I can in no wise admit that the body of Christ in the supper is present with our bodies : for that a thing is said to be present with any one, when in some way or other it communicates itself to that with which it is said to be present, and is perceived by it ; but that a [3 These divines were, James Andreas from Tubingen ; Cuman Flinsbach from Deux-Ponts ; Simon Sultzer and Ulric Coccius from Basle. See Henr. Alting, Hist. Eccles. Palatinse, p. 298. Ed. Ifi44.] 12—2 180 H. ZANCHIUS TO BISHOP GBINDAL. [lET. thing is said to be absent, which in no wise communicates itself to, or is perceived by, that from which it is said to be absent ; whether that object, in regard to local distance or nearness, be at a less or greater interval. Sultzer^ was walking up and down the room, while James Andreas'^ was sitting down and conversing with me upon the supper. I brought forward therefore an illustration taken from themselves, in these words : " You, master arbitrators, are said to be, and really are, present with me, that is, with my body, because you communicate yourselves to me and to my senses, and are perceived by me, while I see you with my eyes, and hear you Avith my ears; and master Sultzer, who is walking up and down, is as much present with me as the rest of you who are sitting ; although as respects local distance or nearness he is farther from me than you are, and you are nearer than he. But those who are out of doors, beyond this chamber (for there were some of the servants of these gentlemen outside) are said to be absent, because I neither hear nor see them, nor perceive them by any bodily sense. Now it is manifest, that the true and substantial body of Christ is not communicated to my body in the supper ; for I do not perceive it by any of my bodily senses, as I neither see it with my eyes, nor hear it with my ears, nor smell it with my nostrils, nor touch it with my hands, nor taste it with my palate. I cannot therefore by any means admit that the body of Christ is present with our bodies in the supper. But that the same true and sub- stantial body of Christ is present with my mind in the supper, where it is most efficacious, I cannot deny ; since it is beyond dis- pute, that it is really communicated to the minds of the faithful, and is really perceived by them : for it is seen by the eye of the believing mind, or the inner man, and is taken by the hand, and eaten by the mouth of the same ; and is in such wise eaten that we feel its virtue and salutary effects in ourselves. I cannot therefore deny in the abstract the real and substantial presence, that is, the presence of the real and substantial body of Christ in the supper, but in that sense in which I have explained it." [1 Simon Sultzer was a native of Interlaken. He studied under Bucer, Capito, and Gryna^us, and became professor of Greek at Berne in 1533.] [2 James Andx-eas was professor of Divinity at Tubingen, and one of the chief of those divines employed in 1569 by the special command of the dukes of Wirtemberg and Brunswick, in composing a form of doctrine in which might be decided all the controversies that divided the church. This was called the form of Concord, and was adopted as a new confession of Lutheran faith, put forth by the Saxons, in consequence of the strict order of the elector Augustus. See Soames's Mosheim, Vol. in. p. 362.] LXXXVl.] H. ZANCHIUS TO BISHOP GRINDAL. 181 Here James Andreas exclaims with astonishment, " Truly then you hold the same opinion as we do." " You have heard, Sirs," I said, " my opinion. If it is also yours, I rejoice for myself, and congratulate you and the church." " Now," says he, " I see why you have brought so many arguments (namely in my confession) against our statement that ' the body of Christ is also eaten with the bodily mouth,' because you suppose that we hold the body of Christ to be eaten with the mouth of our body, as if the body of Christ were in contact with our mouth and body." " Just so," I replied : " I supposed from your writings that such was your opinion." " By no means," said he, " by no means do we entertain this view, but only express ourselves in this way by reason of the sacramental union." I then said, " If these are your sentiments, 1 do not find fault with that expression ; for I also admit, that on ac- count of the sacramental union there is attributed to the body of Christ what is the property of bread, and on the other hand, to bread, what belongs to the body of Christ." " But what," says he, "do you think of the eating of the unworthy?" "If by this terra," I answered, " you mean men who are clearly ungodly, and destitute of true faith, I cannot admit that the body of Christ is eaten by such persons. But if you mean such persons as are endued with faith, albeit a weak one, and of a more relaxed life than is becoming to a Christian, I do not deny it ; for such were those Corinthians who, because they had eaten the body of the Lord unworthily, St Paul says, were judged, that is, were 'chastened^ of the Lord, that they should not be condemned with the world.' " We could not therefore agree about this article. " But I have no doubt," he said, " that if you will more diligently examine this article, you will come over to our sentiments." " I have already," I rephed, " examined it with sufficient attention, and am unable to think otherwise than as I do." " Well," says he, " we have said enough upon the supper. We thank God that in this article re- specting the supper there is no great diiference among you, since you admit on both sides a real and substantial presence." And thus we ended. They then produced some articles about predestination, and gave them to both parties for their inspection. But they gave them me to read over in such haste, that they would not allow them to remain with me even a single night. At last, when they perceived that I would not subscribe to them, unless they were [3 See 1 Cor. xi. 32.] 182 H. ZANCHIUS TO BISHOP GRINDAL. [lET. carefully examined by me at home, they let me have them ; but upon condition of my neither copying them nor allowing them to be copied. They added to them, that they might at least deter- mine something respecting the Lord's supper in general, the Con- fession of Augsburgh, and the articles of concord ' between Luther and Bucer. In the articles upon predestination 1 discovered nothing openly impious, and which could not be admitted with a good con- science ; as master Calvin afterwards wrote both to me and to our pastor. I perceived only that they were so artfully framed, as to make it evident that the arbitrators were more desirous that the contro- verted articles should be buried in a certain darkness spread over them, than that the truth should be unfolded in open day. This was one reason among others why I for a long time, that is, almost to the last, refused to subscribe. At length when I perceived that it rested with myself alone, whether on the termination of this serious dispute (which was not confined to one or two, but extended to all the ministers on one side, and all the professors on the other) peace and harmony should be restored ; and when I saw that I could subscribe with a safe conscience, especially with a protest being premised, I consented. When therefore I came to the place where our senators and the commissioners were, together with all the professors and some others, after returning my thanks to the parties to whom they were due, I said that I would subscribe, but with this protest premised : first, that I would not that any pre- judice should arise through this subscription of mine to other churches, colleges, and the truth ; next, that I would not allow any thing derogatory to that doctrine which I have taught here at Strasburgh these eight years, and which is contained in my lec- tures, disputations, and confessions ; lastly, that I might be allowed to explain the Confession of Augsburgh, the apology^, and articles of concord, as well as these present articles, according to the rule of God's word, the doctrine of Augustine, Luther, and Bucer. I then conditionally subscribed in these words : This form of doc- trine I both acknowledge as godly, and receive it as such. IL Zanchius. The next day, all wrongs having been forgiven, were joined the right hands of fellowship and brotherly love. Thus was [1 This was called the concord of Wittemberg, and took place in the year 1536.] [2 John Faber, Eckiiis, and Cochl?cus, drew up a confutation of the Augsbm-gh Confession; upon which Melancthon published, in 1531, tho apology for it here mentioned, and which constitutes a part of the symbolical books of tho Lutheran church. See Soames's Mosheim, iii. 148.] LXXXVI.] H. ZANCHIUS TO BISHOP GRINDAL. 183 our disagreement settled, without any derogation from the truth of doctrine. Meanwhile, however, there are not wanting those who blame the act : but such persons do not consider what that passage means, " Christ pleased not himself;" nor do they reflect upon the serious evils occasioned by dissensions. Why, for the sake of peace among so many, both ministers and professors of the same city, should I not subscribe to the Confession of Augsburgh, and its apology, especially in the way I did, both my interpretation and also my protest being allowed by the commissioners? They are offended at those words in the apology, " that the body of Christ is really and substantially present in the Lord's supper." But I explained upon what understanding they might be admitted, and how that may be said to be really and substantially present, which is really and sub- stantially partaken of. When the sun is above our hemisphere, and communicates its real and substantial body to be seen by us, and by means of that body its heat and light tq be partaken of, may we not say with propriety that the sun is really and substan- tially present ? So likewise on the other hand, when having removed to the other hemisphere, because he no longer communi- cates himself to be seen and partaken of by us, we say he is absent : when yet, in regard to local distance or propinquity, he is as far from us when above ours, as when he is above the other hemisphere. What therefore is to prevent our saying, that Christ's body is really and substantially present to those to whom he really and substan- tially communicates himself? But, say they, other persons do not so understand and interpret as you do. But I did not subscribe to the interpretations of others, but only to the words of the Augsburgh Confession, and that according to the sense which I acknowledge to be a godly one ; and my interpretation was allowed. Calvin certainly thinks differ- ently, and I respect his opinion far more than that of many others ; for he truly has the Spirit of God, and looks more to the edification of the churches, than to a certain vainglorious pertinacity in our phrases, expressions, and syllables. He writes to our pastor, that he does not approve of persons simply refusing to subscribe ; and recommends their subscribing, provided only exceptions be given in and allowed : and he advises me by letter to make an attestation before the magistrate, that I have been induced to subscribe from an earnest desire of peace, but with those exceptions, and that I now profess and confirm the same. If there had been any hope of obtaining a discussion in which the truth would have openly 1:84 H. ZANCHIUS TO BISHOP GRINDAL, [lET. triumphed, or of a definitive decision, as they call it, being pro- nounced respecting the whole controversy, or of setthng the dispute in any other better way, I never would have subscribed. But as I can hope for none of these things, what, I ask, could I have done? I believe that with your piety and prudence you would have acted just as I did. If I am mistaken, pardon this my opinion of your piety, and pardon likewise, I entreat you, I no longer call it my brevity, but my too great prolixity ; and farewell, and retain me in the number of your friends. I salute my four noble gossips^ masters Wroth, Cook, KnoUes, and Heton ; and I wish you would communicate to them and to other learned men this my com- promise, and candidly write me word what both you and they think of it. May the Lord Jesus evermore guide and protect you by his Spirit ! [H. Zanchius.] LXXXVII. H. FOLKERZHEIMER TO J. SIMLER. [B. 44.] Embden, Aug. 21, 1563. It has happened, Josiah, contrary to all my expectation, and, I fear, to your duty likewise, that I have received no letter from you at the last Frankfort fair. And, in truth, I was exceedingly grieved at the loss of the delightful, and indeed the only enjoyment of our great intimacy, which in the privation of personal intercourse was to be derived from our correspondence. Although those noble and excellent persons^ earnestly desired to retain me longer with them in England, yet induced by the letters of my friends, and the desire of seeing them, I preferred returning to my country. As soon, therefore, as I had received the horse which the bishop of AVorcester had presented me with, and had obtained from Robert^, the master of the horse, a licence for its exportation, I began to think about my voyage. When the vessel was left on shore at the turn of the tide, we hoisted up the horse, fastened with three ropes round his belly, in such a way that he could be lowered and got [1 Compatres, godfiithers to his children. The word gossip is from the Anglo-Saxon, God and sib (affinity), and is thus defined by Becon (Acts of Christ and Antichi-ist), Vol. in. p. 532. "Christian gossips, that is to say, those men and women that have been godfathers and godmothers together of one child at baptism."] [2 Namely, bishops Jewel and Sandys. See above, Letter LXXIX. p. 169.] [3 Sir Robert Dudley, afterwards earl of Leicester.] LXXXVII.] H. FOLKERZHEIMER TO J. SIMLER. 185 aboard. We had intended to sail direct for Belgium ; but when we had proceeded about five miles, we were thrown, against our will, by a west wind upon the coast of France. After having somewhat recruited my horse, half dead with hunger, as his rider was with sea-sickness, I immediately betook myself with much satisfaction to the Belgian frontier. The principal towns on our journey were Calais, Gravelines, Dunkirk, Bruges, Ghent ; and then in Brabant, Brussels, Louvaine, Mechlin, and Antwerp ; lastly, in Guelderland, leaving Holland on the left, Hoogstraet, Nimeguen, Arnheim and Deventer. At Groningen I met my brother Ulric with his wife and little boy, to our great delight on both sides. Having staid with him a week, I set oif for Embden. Many things have hap- pened in the course of my life which have afforded me very great pleasure ; but, immortal powers ! what can be compared to that greeting and those embraces of my parents, sisters, and brothers? I do not now feel so much surprised at the great longing of Ulysses, whose home, and wife, and children were so dear to him, that if he could but see the smoke* of his country, he would despise immortahty. I can never be sufl&ciently and duly thankful to our good and gracious God, for having so abundantly granted those things which I am often wont to pray for. The kings of Denmark and Sweden^ are making preparation for a most destructive war. Duke Eric^ of Brunswick has gone over to the king of Denmark with a large body of troops. The Dane is said to excel in infantry and cavalry, and the Sweed in his navy. There has been more than once a most severe engagement by sea. The king of Denmark, it is thought, will not be able to do any thing in Sweden, even with superior forces, by reason of the number of rivers and lakes, by which, as the bridges are every- where broken down and cut off, all access is shut out ; so that they must necessarily wait for the winter to freeze over the rivers and open a passage. You have a person with you, by the name of Egbert Brassius, the son of a worthy and excellent preacher. If you will aid him with your advice and assistance in the prosecution of his studies, and notice the young man, who is a great lover of piety and learning, you will do nothing inconsistent with that reputation for [4 See Horn. Od. i. 57, &c.] [5 Namely Frederick II., and Eric XIV. The occasion of this war was the voluntary submission of Esthonia to Sweden in 1561.] [6 Eric, son of Eric, duke of Hanover, and grandson of William, duke of Brunswick.] 186 H. FOLKEBZHEIMER TO J. SIMLEK. [lET. kindness that Josiah already possesses. You had intended to come to us, together with Froschover, and pass over from hence to England ; and my brother and other friends, as well as myself, earnestly beg and pray you to do so. And this, I hope, will take place during my stay at home ; for I am thinking of going into Italy. Farewell, my Josiah, and salute warmly and respectfully in my name your wife, together with the lady your neighbour', the Bullingers, Gualter, Zuinglius, Lavater, John Frisius, Haller, JuHus, Pellican, Guldebeckius, the Colhns's, Funckius, Wolfius, Bibhander, and all our other common friends. Embden, Aug. 21, 1563. Sa- lute too my young countryman Defholdius together with his tutor. [H. FOLKERZHEIMER.] LXXXVIII. BISHOP GRINDAL TO C. HUBERT. [B. 45.] FuLHAM, Aug. 23, 1563. Greeting. Dithelm Blaurer, who at your advice and per- suasion came over to me in England, is now returning home at the summons of his father. I could not therefore allow one who had been recommended to me by a letter from you, to return to you without a letter from me. And it is also just that I should give such testimony as he deserves, of liis pious and sober conduct during his residence in my family. His assistance has been of use to me in many respects, and would have been much more so, had not the infinite engagements connected with my office distracted me in various ways. But that you may know upon what terms I have dismissed him, I have paid him, upon leaving me, the whole quarter's salary, which would have been due next Michaelmas, viz. four French crowns, together with four pounds of our money for the expenses of his journey, making thirteen French crowns and a little over. I have given him too some little presents in addition. My only motive in writing this is that you may know the plain truth of the case. I have also paid Abel, for the expenses of Dithelm when he first came over from Germany, more than four- teen crowns, because, as it was winter, they were forced by con- trary winds to wait somewhat longer on the coast of Planders. I hear your disputes are now settled. God grant that the peace may be soUd, and sincere, and without disguise ! I have no doubt of it on your part. 1 fear lest the other party may some [1 This rn;iy perhaps sci'vc to explain the Uvst sontcncc in Letter LXXIX.J LXXXVIIl.] RISIIOl' GRINDAL TO C. HUBERT. 187 time or other raise a fresh disturbance. But I heartily congratu- late you, my very dear master Conrad, on your pious respect for our common instructor, master Bucer of happy memory, whose reputation you have hitherto defended with so much firmness. I wish you every blessing in the Lord. From my country house at Fulham on the banks of the Thames, Aug. 23, 1563. Yours in Christ, Edm. Grindal, Bishop of London. LXXXLX. J. ABEL TO H. BULLINGER. [B. 45«.] London, Aug. 24, 1563. Praise to God. My friendly greeting and wiUing service to you, dear master and friend. I sent my last letter to Strasburgh fair, in which I wrote you word that I had received your letter, together with some books, and that I had forwarded the same to master Horn, bishop of Winchester, who has sent me word in re- turn that he intends to send you a letter together with some money, which I have not yet received ; but as soon as he sends it, I will forward it to you immediately. He has written me word likewise, that he means to send two crowns for the housekeeper at Zurich who waited at the English house ^ there, and was called the EngUsh servant. Master Pilkington too, who is now bishop of Durham, has given me a crown for the said housekeeper, which I send you herewith, and pray you to give it her. I have done my best for her, and spoken with other bishops on her behalf; for John Burcher has both spoken and written to me respecting some relief for her, and says that she is a pious poor woman, and faithfully waited upon the EngUsh at Zurich. John Burcher is now become a clergyman in the country not far from London, where he preaches the word of God faithfully, and is much beloved, and does much good. His wife has been dehvcred of a little girl, and is also well and hearty. I have not much news to send you. Our Lord God is very angry with us for our ingratitude ; for his holy word is daily preached here among us, and we have not loved nor followed the same, nor commended it by our lives : wherefore he has this last year sent a great dearth among us, and now he has sent such a plague^ and pestilence among us, that in the city which om* Enghsh took last year in Normandy, some thousands have died so wonder- [2 This house belonged to Froschovcr. See the next Letter, p. 189.] [3 See above, Letter LXXXIV. p. 17G.J 188 J. ABEL TO H. BULLINGER. [lET. fully by reason of the plague, that our people have quitted the said town, and are returned from thence with all their goods and artillery and arms, &c., by which means the plague is so rife in London, that there are dying by the pestilence live or six hundred a week ; and there is reason to fear that if our Lord should not have compassion upon us, it will become yet more prevalent, for it has only just begun. God give us his grace and holy Spirit that we may amend our lives, that his holy name may be praised and magnified thereby ; and then will he take away this plague. His holy will be done from henceforth and for evermore. Amen. I have nothing else to write to you about at this time ; but I pray you to salute from me your dear wife, together with both your sons and their wives, as also master Gualter and his dear wife, with John Henry Smith', and all my other acquaintance. The grace of God be with you all, and preserve you from all evil. Amen. John Abel. Eng-land. XC. BISHOP HORN TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 61.] Winchester, Dec. 13, 1563. I HAVE now received, my very dear Bullinger, your three letters ; two of which, namely, the first, dated October 10, [1562], and the second, dated March 10, 1563, reached me only on the 31st of last May ; the third, dated on the 29th of August, reached me in good time in October. I perceived in them the great strength of your regard, which expressed itself in such dehghtful terms, and could be satisfied only with my letter, or my trifling presents. They were sent by me however, to make you understand that not myself only, but my property and fortune, is ready to do you service. As for your thanking me for the cloth, and expressing your intention of returning the obligation, I therein acknowledge your exceeding kindness in confessing yourself to be under any obligation to me, who am so deeply indebted to yourself. And when you daily refresh your remembrance of me in that silver cup, I take it thus, that as nothing can be more gratifying to me than your kind- ness and esteem, so it is a source of exceeding pleasure to me to be in your frequent recollection, and to be as it were constantly before \} Namely, John Henry Fabricius mentioned above, p. 118.] XC] BISHOl* HORN TO H. BULLINGER. 189 your eyes. But since a cup of so moderate a price must be very small, I have sent you fourteen crowns more, together with my coat of arms, as you desire, that you may get a cup made that is larger and more suitable for a full party. I am equally troubled with yourselves at the insidiousness and fury of the enemies, from which you are in danger : but I am, on the other hand, reheved by the consolation which you derive through him who has overcome the world, and whose people cannot be conquered or overcome by the world. And we are not so much distressed by the evils of popery, as the glory of God is illustrated, and the gospel magnified. We have throughout England the same ecclesiastical doctrine as yourselves : as to rites and ceremonies ^ nor, as the people are led to believe, do we at all diifer in our estimation of them. But we have never ceased, according to your advice, to teach, warn, and enforce what is right and necessary to be followed, from the holy scriptures ; lest the flock committed to our charge should, through our fault, be scattered by those inve- terate errors which are still circulated by the papists in secret. Of the books you mention in your second letter, I have received three upon the same arguments, against the Ubiquitarianism of Brentius ; which subject a certain Englishman has undertaken as you desire, and by the divine assistance will treat with zeal and eloquence, that it may be manifest to every one, that the people of England entertain on these points the same opinions as you do at Zurich. I had heard of the death of that illustrious man, Peter Martyr, before the arrival of your letter. I rejoice at the succes- sor whom he appointed in his dying moments. When the Tri- dentine Council, framed as it is against Christ, shall have reached its utmost height, he that sitteth in the heavens, and laugheth them to scorn, will disperse it, as he has always made the vain counsels of men of no efl'ect, and brought them to nought. It now remains for me, my Bulhnger, to salute affectionately, in my wife's name as well as my own, both yourself and the excel- lent ladies, your wife and Froschover's ; also your sons-in-law, Simler, Lewis, Lavater, and Zuinglius ; as well as ray beloved brethren in Christ, masters Gualter, Bibliander, Wolfius, and Haller ; ray landlord too, and that poor widow who waited upon us when we lived together in Froschover's house, and to whora I have sent two crowns. I wish you health from the Lord. I will hence- forth take care that you shall not be in want of a letter from me, [2 The original MS. is here illegible.] 190 BISHOP HORN TO H. RDLLINGER. [lET. and I ask you again and again to do the same on your part. Fare- well. May the Lord Jesus long preserve you in safety to his church! Winchester, December 13, 1563. Yours wholly in Christ, Robert Winton. XCI. BISHOP PARKHURST TO J. SIMLER. [A. 62.] LiTDHAM, Feb. 17, 15f;4. I SEND you, according to your request, two letters written to me by Peter Martyr : should I find any more, I will send them. I wrote to you on the 26th of April, and also on the 14th of August. For the silver [medal of Peter] Martyr I sent a golden Ehzabeth. You are right in preparing an edition of the works of Martyr ; for you will thus deserve well of all pious persons, and perform a most useful service to the church of Christ. May the Lord prosper your undertaking and bring it to a happy issue I The wife ' of the duke of Norfolk died in childbed on the 10th of January, and was buried at Norwich on the 24th of the same month. I preached her funeral sermon. There were no ceremonies at the funeral, wax candles or torches. Except the sun nothing shone, which sadly annoyed the papists. Nothing of the kind has been ever seen in England, especially at the funeral of a peer or peeress. Other news you will learn from my letters to others. Farewell, my Simler. Salute in my name all my friends, especially your excellent wife. Mine salutes you and yours and all our friends. Ludham, Feb. 17, 1564. Yours, John Parkhurst, [Bishop] of Norwich. Give this catalogue to master Gesner^. [1 This was Margaret, daughter and heir of Thomas Lwd Dudley, of Walden, widow of Lord Henry Dudley. She was the second wife of Thomas, fourth duke of Norfolk. The duke's council appointed the dean of Christ church, Sampson, to preach at her interment. But the bishop hearing of it, for doing the greater honour to the duke, sent his letter to the council, offering his service in that behalf. For although, as ho said, the other could do much better than he, yet he thought it his bounden duty to do all things that he might to God's glory, to do honour to the duke's grace. Therefore the dean buried her, and the bishop made the sermon. He wrote to Mr Foxe, telling him, after his jocose way, "All things were done honourably, sine crux, sine lux, at non sine tinkling. There was ilDither torch, neither taper, candle, nor any light else, beside the light of the sun ; singing there was enough." Strype, Annals, i. ii. 45. See MS. Ilarl. 416. 175.] [2 Gesner was minded to )nil)lish the ancient ecclesiastical authors from XCII.] H. ZANCHIUS TO BISHOP GRINDAL. 191 XCII. H. ZANCHIUS TO BISHOP GRINDAL. [3.46.] Near Chiavenna, August^ 1564. I SEND you, reverend prelate, my judgment respecting the con- troversy of the churches about the supper of the Lord, which for certain reasons I have dedicated to my friend master Knolles. I did not indeed write it with a view to its being pubhshed, as you may yourself conjecture, both from its brevity and style ; but since my friends, and Sturmius among the rest, so highly approved it, as to compel me to publish it, I chose rather by my comphance to appear to my friends wanting in talent, than ungrateful to the churches by my refusal. You will therefore receive this copy as a testimony of my respect. I hope to send you better and more copious tidings very soon. As the Lord had heretofore visited you with the pestilence^, so he has this year visited us, that is, my church at Chiavenna. I call it my church, that you may know that I am no longer professor at Strasburgh, but am minister at Chiavenna on the borders of Italy, and which is so called, as being the key* of the passage from Italy to Germany, and vice versa. good copies. For which pui-pose he sent to the bishop of Norwich a cata- logue of books of tliat sort, that search might diligently be made in all our best libraries for MS. copies of them. This is the catalogue here referred to. The bishop sent one copy of it to Foxe, to search the queen's library ; one to Mr Sampson, or Dr Humphi'ey, that search might be made in Oxford ; and another to Mr Beaumont, master of Trinity College, that he might do the like in Cambridge. See Strype, Annals, i. ii. 45.] [3 Zanchius left Strasbm-gh in November 1563, and entered on his pas- toral charge at Chiavenna in the Januai-y following ; shortly after which the town was visited by a pestilence, which in seven months carried off twelve hundred of the inhabitants. "When the plague," he says, "actually began to make havock, I enforced repentance and faith, while I had a place to preach in, or any congregation to hear. Many being dead, and others having fled the town (like shipwrecked mariners, who, to avoid instant destruction make towards what coast they can), but very few remained; and of these remaining few, some were almost terrified to death, otliors were solely em- ployed in taking care of the sick, and others in guarding the walls. They concurred in advising mo to consult my own safety by withdrawing for a time, till the indignation should be overpast. I betook myself therefore, with all my family, to a high mountain, not a great way from the town, yet remote from human converse, and peculiarly fonned for contemplation and unmolested retirement. Here wo led a solitary life for three months and a half. I devoted my time chiefly to meditation and writing, to prayer, and reading the scriptures. I never was happier in my own soul, nor enjoyed a better state of health. Zanch. Op.] [■1 Zanchius considers the Latin name of Clavenna to be derived from clavis.] \ 192 H. ZANCHIUS TO BISHOP GRINDAL. [lKT. You will learn from a book which I will shortly send you, the rea- son' of my at length leaving Strasburgh. You know why that worthy Martyr-' of pious memory could no longer remain at Strasburgh ; and therefore he removed to Zurich. Besides that being under bondage to man I had also other im- portant reasons. And the French church that was at Strasburgh was dispersed by the same cause that occasioned my departure. Those good people are no longer satisfied that their professors or ministers should subscribe to the Confession^ of Augsburgh ; but they require also that in every particular, both as to the under- standing of that confession, and the interpretation of scripture, they should be of the same mind with their preachers without any dis- agreement whatever. You know the author of this : may the Lord have pity upon that city ! I did everything to retain ray professor- ship, and for this sole reason, that I might at least preserve in the schools the ancient doctrine of that church, and which I know is the christian one. But what can you do, when the Lord sees fit to punish any people by reason of their iniquities ? I commend to you that aftair of my relative Laurence Limacius. Farewell, my excellent father, and singular good friend. In the month of August, 1564. From the mountains near Chiavenna. H. Zanchius. XCIII. H. ZANCHIUS TO H. KNOLLES. [B. 47.] Near Chiavenna, August^ 1564. My judgment respecting the controversy of the churches upon the Lord's supper, which, most honoured gossip*, I have dedicated [1 The immediate occasion of Zanchy's leaving Strasburgh was the con- troversy with Heshusius, the publication of whose book, concerning the eucharist and in defence of consubstantiation, Zanchy had endeavoui'ed to prevent.] [2 The enemies of Peter Martyr affirmed, that in the doctrine of the Lord's supper he was gone from the opinion of the Confession of Augsburgh, and that therefore it was to be feared he would make some troubles in the church. And though the senate was satisfied with his vindication of himself, yet because he saw that this controversy of the sacrament was daily stirred up with more bitterness of mind, he rejoiced that there was an occasion offered (by his being invited by the senate of Zurich to succeed Conrad Pellican) whereby he might rid himself from these troubles. See his life by Simler, at the end of his Common-places.] [3 See above, p. 20, note 1.] I* Lat. Compnter. H. Knollcs was sponsor to Zanchy's daughter. The XCIII.] H. ZANCHIUS TO H. KNOLLES. 193 to yourself, to the end that it may be a public and at the same time a perpetual testimony of my gratitude towards you, I had given to that most excellent and most careful, and I may add too, most learned printer John Oporinus^, to be printed in fair type. But since, as I perceive, he was unable to procure from the censors a licence to print this book, the reason of which I leave you to guess, he transferred it to a printer at Mulhausen. This person, either through carelessness or want of skill, sent it forth full of errors, which displeased me exceedingly ; so that I have been obliged to correct with the pen whatever copies I had in my possession. I send you therefore a corrected copy, and entreat you to take in good part these few pages : I should have sent some more copies to my other friends, if I could have met with any one to be the bearer of them. As to other matters, we are all, by the blessing of God, in good health, and yom* Httle god-daughter, who is now weaned, prattles, runs about, and plays the monkey. You have, I suppose, heard ere this from others about my having left Strasburgh ; but you are not, perhaps, at all aware of the reason. It was the same, to tell you in one word, on account of which also the excellent Peter Martyr® of pious memory long since departed to Zurich ; namely, a dedication here alluded to is a long one, and chiefly refers to the subject of the treatise. The last sentence is as follows : Te igitur, humanissime ac generose KnoUe, sicut ciun hie esses apud nos initio hujus anni, post tuam ad conventum electorum nuper Francofui'ti pro electore regis Romanorum habitum nomine vestrse reginse susceptam legationem, delegi mihi in filiaa mese Lselise Constantiaj compatrem ; tuque ita lubenti animo earn e sancto fonte in tuam profiliam suscepisti, ut ei etiam honorificum fieVas apyvpovv tuse fidei testimonium donaris, ita in protectorem hujus mei quasi novi fihoU eligere decrevi, persuasus te illius protectionem nuUo modo recusatm-um.] [5 John Oporinus, or Herbst, was a celebrated printer at Basle. Foxe the martyrologist was employed by him as a corrector of the press. Strype, Cranmer, 514. An account of his life is given in Moreri, and by Andrew Lociscus, Orat. de vita et obitic Oporini.] [6 Peter Martyr left Strasburgh in 1556, in consequence of the attacks made upon him by his adversaries for supposed heterodoxy concerning the natm'e of the Lord's supper. "For both by letters, and by their readings and sermons they so gall him, as there wanted nothing to the accusing of Martyr but tho naming of him ; yea, and one of the students made an oration openly in the school touching tho eucharist, made to this end, that he might of set purpose condemn Martyr and his doctrine. Wherefore since he perceived that his adversaries did daily make more open war against him, and that they did by name reprove him in their books, as also Sleidan in his history maketh mention, he began to deliberate with himself of his depar- ture." See his life by Simler, at the end of his Common Places.] 13 194 H. ZANCHIUS TO H. KNOLLES. [lET. bondage to men quite unworthy of a Christian, and much more of a divine. When therefore I perceived that it was no longer per- mitted me to teach with freedom, nor to defend that doctrine which, drawn as it was from the fountain of holy scripture, those most learned men, Bucer, Capito, Martyr, and Calvin, had held forth to their audience in that very school many years before me, yea, and which I also had for nine years taught there in my lectures, and defended in pubhc disputations ; I resigned my former situation, and accepted another, namely, the ministry of the church at Chiavenna. But the Lord has wonderfully afflicted my church, yea, the whole town, with a pestilence, which has destroyed two thirds of it, one third only being left, as we read also in Zechariah^ But this pestilence is not only raging here, but also in many other places, both in Germany, as at Basle, and in France, as at Lyons. May the Lord have mercy upon us all ! Italy is free from this evil, but is labouring under a dearth of provision. Your gossip^ sends her best respects. I beg you to salute my friends, and especially [Sir Thomas] "Wroth, [Sir Antony] Cook, and also Heton, my gossips. Farewell. [H. Zanchius.] XCIV. BISHOP JEWEL TO H. BOLLINGER. [A. 63.] Salisbury, March 1, 1565. What shall I say to you, most learned su* and renowned father? I am both ashamed and grieved; ashamed, in the first place, that I have not written more frequently ; and also grieved, that the letters which I have written have not been able to reach you. I beseech you, however, not to entertain the thought that either the school of Zurich, or the republic, or, lastly, your exceed- ing kindness can so quickly have passed away from my mind. In- deed I have all of you in my eyes and in my heart, and yourself especially, my father, who are now the only light of our age. And now, as to my correspondence, I, for my part, the last year only excepted, when all intercourse was every where prevented by the plague and pestilence, have never omitted writing to your- self, Lavater, Simlcr, and JuUus. Had I not done so, I should scarcely seem to have retained any sense, I will not say of duty, but even of common courtesy. But what has become of my former letters, I do not know. I hear that my last was taken by the French in a sea-fight, and carried off to Calais. [1 See Zcch. xiii. 8,] [2 Lat. Commater. Sco before, p. 184.] XCXV.] BISHOP JEWEL TO H. BULLINGER. 195 But no more of this. Attend now to some affairs of om's, in which I know, from your usual kindness, you will take more interest. First then, by the blessing of our great and good God, all things are settled with us in the matters of religion. The popish exiles are disturbing us and giving us aU the trouble in their power ; and in their pubUshed books, I know not whether through any ill luck, (shall I say ?) or desert of mine, aim at me alone; and this too, three of them have done at once, and with most outrageous clamour : as I alone have to answer them all, you must not imagine that I have nothing to do. Among other things, the Ubiquitarian^ question is pressed upon me, wliich, for the sake of our old Tubin- gen* friend, I have purposely treated of very copiously, to the best of my power, and as the subject required; but in our own language, as being intended for our own people. If I have leisure, I wiU copy a part, and send it you. But as to that old man, I cannot make out what I ought to thinlv about him ; he appears to mo to become more insane every day. For I have read the new " Phas- ma^ of Menander," which he has lately pubUshed ; and I have to thank you, both for that book, and for all your letters, and all your kindness. The state is in tranquillity, both at home and abroad, by land and sea. We are at peace with France", and the disorders in Flanders are at last settled. Merchants go backwards and for- wards from both countries, the Flemish to us and our merchants in turn to them. [Cardinal] Granvelle'^, through whose knavery alone [3 "His controversy with Harding gave him an opportunity of incident- ally considering the subject. The sixth article in his challenge relates to the question, whether Clu-ist's body is, or might be, in a thousand places, or more, at one and the same time. Nothing can well bo imagined more triumphant than the reasoning of Jewel, or more ridiculous than the argu- ments of his adversary." Lo Bas, Life of Jewel, p. 128.] [4 Brentius. See note 2, p. 139.] p See Ter. Eun. Prol. 9.] [<> The 29th of April [1564] the two treaties of peace with France were scaled with the queen's ratification. Strype, Annals, i. ii. 116. See note 5, p. 177.] [■^ "The English merchants removed to Embden by means of Granvelle, the Cardinal of AiTas, who, hating the English for their religion, had practised to blow the coals between the Low Countries and them, and to spoil their ancient commerce, by fomenting jealousies and complaints ono against another. And the duchess of Parma, governess of the said Low Countries, being of the same disaflfection towards the English nation, at length forbade all English cloths to bo imported; whereat the English, partly resenting this dealing, and partly out of fear of the inquisition now brought in, departed with their eftccts to Embden. But an ambassador 13—2 19 S' BISHOP JEWEL TO H. BULLINGER. [lET. all those disturbances began, so managed matters, that by the irre- gularity and stoppage of the markets, (neither imports nor exports being allowed,) the tradesmen all aghast, and the town's people, who Hterally gain their Hvelihood by spinning wool, reduced to idleness and destitution, some popular commotion^ or domestic sedition might be the consequence. For he hoped by this means our relio-ion would be shaken at the same time. But God has rather turned these counsels upon their author : for our people re- mained in their duty, as it was right they should ; but the people of Flanders, when our merchants took their departure, and settled their trade at Embden^, were exceedingly indignant, and did every thing but break out into open disorders. The Irish, as I know you have heard, are now subject to us, and adopt our laws. The pope, not very long since, sent over an unprincipled and crafty agent, with orders to raise a commotion in that island. He was an Irishman, and was to stir up that wild and savage race against us for the cause of rehgion. But the knave was apprehended on his first attempt, and examined, and sent prisoner to England. And thus the most holy father has deter- mined, that since he is unable to move the powers above, he will stir up hell beneath. In Scotland^ [affairs are] as we desire. The queen alone retains her mass, against the general wish. [Don Diego Gusman] sent from Spain to the queen, of a more grave and •wise head, moderated their differences soon after, and set the trade on foot again between both people." See Strype, Life of Grindal, oh. ix. p. 125, &c. Also Burgon's Life of Sir T. Gresham, Vol. ii. p. 45, &c.] [1 "Ytt ys moche to be douttyd," Sir R. Clough, who was on the spot, writes to Sir T. Gresham, " of an insonrrecyon within the towne, and that, out of hande ; for here ys syche mysery, within thys towne, that the lyke hathe nott bene sene. AUmost every nyght, howsys [are] broken up and robbyd." See Burgon, as above. Vol. ii. p. 54.] [2 The English merchants, says Stowe, made trial of Embden, in East Friesland, as a mart for then- commodities, by sending their cloth fleet thither, about Easter, 1564. See Strype, Life of Grindal, p. 125, &c. Sir H. Clough, in a memorial to Sir T. Gresham, on the comparative merits of Embden and Ilambm-gh for purposes of trade, remarks, among the incon- veniences of the former, that "the people of the towne are rude both in worde and deede, not meete to intertcyne merchants ; and not that only, but also withoute order of beleefe, not feai-ing God nor the dcvell, maynteyners of Anabaptists, Libertines, and all other kyndo of damnable sects, withowto any reverence to God ; as it is well to be seen by their churches ; for that in one place they preache, and in other place of the chirrche there lycth feathers, netts, and baiTclls, with dyvers other unseemely things, not fitt to be set in those places." Burgon, as above, Vol. ii. p. 59.] [3 Some words are wanting in the original MS.] XCIV.] BISHOP JEWEL TO H. BULLINGER. 197 Parkhurst, Horn, Sampgon, Sandys, Lever, Chambers, are well, and at their respective posts. It is now two years since I have seen any of them. Farewell, ray father : may the Lord Jesus very long preserve you alive and well ! Salute Gualter, Lavater, Simler, Wolfius, Haller, Gesner, Frisius, Zuinglius, Wickius, to each of whom I would write if I had leisure, or rather, if I were not quite overwhelmed with business. Salisbury, ui England, March 1, 1565. Your much attached and devoted, John Jewel. XCV. R. MASTERS TO R. GUALTER. [B. 48.] London, March 4, 1565. Since I last wrote to you, very reverend sir, I have received from you three letters abounding in the expressions of your regard towards me ; for my not having sooner replied to which I will neither plead in excuse the business in which I was then engaged, nor forgetfulness of you, nor any thing else, except the plague, which was so long raging among us, that the court* has been a long time, and at a great distance, absent from London ; whither having, by the blessing of God, returned in safety, I have deter- mined to send you this letter. I have received your discourses on the minor prophets by the hands of my friend and fellow-citizen, John Abel ; and I understand that they are so esteemed by all learned and godly persons, that there is scarce a single individual at this time in all Europe, who in their opinion can equal or excel you in the interpretation of the sacred writings : and they are anxiously expecting the remaining discourses which you have pro- mised on St John. I have also stated to those who arc in chief authority among us, with how great affection you regard us and our government, when you write that you have, for our sake and that of true rehgion, so anxiously exerted yourself with those parties who were so exceedingly active in bringing about a treaty between you and the French''. The Guisian party in France is getting weaker and weaker every day, so much so, that the cardinal of Lorraine ''j together [4 See above. Letter LXXXIV. p. 176. On October 2, 1563, parliament was prorogued in consequence of tbe plague, unto October 5, 1564. D'Ewes, Journals, p. 91.] [5 See the next letter, p. 199.] [<> The cardinal was on his return from the council of Trent, in January 1565, and invited all his friends to join him, and swell his escort, that ho 198 K. MASTERS TO R. GU ALTER. [lET.. with his nephew the duke of Guise, was very near being killed the other day from an attack at Paris in the public street by Mont- morenci the governor of the city, (the marshal, as they call liim) and eldest son of Ann, duke of Montmorenci, the grand master of the cavalry of France, or constable, as he is called ; in which tumult there fell five of the armed escort of the cardinal of Lor- raine, who, with his nephew, escaped with difficulty to the house of a certain tradesman, where they found a temporary refuge. The commissioners' of our queen and of the king of Spain are to meet in Flanders at the beginning of this spring, for the purpose of re-establishing the commerce at Antwerp between our merchants and theirs upon its former footing. This for two or three years past has been interrupted by disagreements between the merchants of both countries, to the great detriment of each : in other respects however, as far as government is concerned, every thing is settled might make a sort of triumphal entry into Paris, where marshal Mont- morenci was at that time governor, and was desirous of mortifying the cardinal's vanity. To put a good appearance on his conduct, he went to the jiarliament, and said that he had information that somebody proposed coming to Paris with armed followers, which, if it occurred, he would resist with open force. The cardinal was informed of the marshal's design, but paid no attention to it, and entered boldly into the city. Montmorenci soon arrived, and ordered him and his followers to put away theii* pistols. He had sent a messenger to make the same communication before the car- dinal had entered ; but that person was not well received, and the marshal immediately set out at the head of a body of horsemen. A skirmish ensued, the cardinal jumped from his horse, and ran into a shoj^, from whence he gained his own hotel in the night. See Browning, Hist, of the Huguenots, chap. 18, and the authorities there quoted.] [1 There is among the Flanders correspondence, in the state-paper office, a MS. entitled "A memorial of the matters to be entreated at the coUoquie to be holden at Bruges betwixt the commissioners of her majestic ; that is, the viscount Montague, Mr doctor Wotton, one of her majesties privy council, and Mr Haddon, of Requests, on the one part, and the commis- sioners of the king of Spaine on the other. Made at Westminster, the xith of March, 15G4 [5,] in the viith year of her majesties reign." The English commissioners arrived at Bruges on the 24th of March, and remained there till the conference was suspended by mutual consent in May. It was renewed in the following year, and again suspended, it being agreed upon in the mean time by all parties that all things should remain in their actual position ; that the treaty for free intercourse between both countries should be considered as still in force ; and that the merchant strangers settled in either country should bo considerately and kindly treated by the governments under which they respectively lived. See Burgon's Life and Times of Sir Thomas Gresham, ii. pp. 66, 88, seqq.] XCV.] . R. MASTERS TO R. GU ALTER. 199 and quiet among us. In Scotland the monasteries are razed to the ground, and monkery and idolatry are abohshed ; the queen alone, of the Guise family, (for she is the sister's daughter of the duke^ that was slain), still retaining her mass. Our friend the earl of Bedford is absent from court, and has been so for the last half year, as he is appointed governor of Berwick on the borders of Scotland, and which divides us from them. I have however taken care to inform him in his absence, that you had not forgotten him, and I commended you to him in my letter. Farewell. May the Lord God preserve and direct you to the glory of his name, and that you may long hve and labour in his vineyard! London, March 4, 1565. Yours wholly from my heart, Richard Masters. XCVI. BISHOP HORN TO R. GUALTERi [A. 64.] Farnham Castle, July 17, 1505. You may easily imagine, my Gualter, with what affection and delight I received your first letter, because it informed me of the prosperity of the state of Zurich, on the good faith and liberality of which I was thrown, when an exile ; and also of the good health, both of yourself and my other very dear and valued friends. To this was added your lucubration on St John's gospel ; which afforded you, as you say, an opportunity of writing. Tliis I highly approve of, as judging it will greatly contribute both to a true knowledge of scripture, and also to godliness ; and I think it should be read, not only by the students, Avhose benefit you prin- cipally have in view, but also by the professors themselves. In the treaty between France and Switzerland, I commend the clear-sightedness of Zurich, in having detected the artifices of the French, disguised under the pretence of rehgion ; and I hope that your neighbours, the Bernese, will, after your example, withhold their concurrence in so dishonourable a league. As to the pesti- lence which has lately visited your district, I am of opinion that even the godly themselves are sometimes afflicted for the sake of the ungodly. And as father Bullinger', though attacked with it, has escaped danger, we ought to tliink that he, who has endured [2 Francis, duke of Guise, was assassinated in 1563 by John Poltrot do Merc at the siege of Orleans.] [3 Two of his daughters died of the plague this year. He lost his wife and another daughter by the same disease in the year preceding.] 200 BISHOP HORN TO R. GUALTER. [ LET. these harder times, is reserved by the Lord for happier ones. I ascribe it to the mercy of God, who willed not that your labours shoidd be interrupted, that your house was free from that con- tagion. Such is the state of our affairs, that as you are afraid of the treachery of your French neighbours, so we are in fear of intestine treachery from the papists. The heads of that party are in public custody ; the rest, aifecting to be exiles, are endeavouring, by some of their writings dispersed among the people, to bring themselves into power and us into odium, having obtained a handle of this kind, (small enough indeed,) tlirough the controversy lately arisen among us about square caps and surplices. The papists cried out, that there is not among us that unanimity in rehgion which we profess to have ; but that we are guided by various opinions, and unable to remain in any fixed purpose. This calumny has gained strength from the act of parliament for repressing the impiety of the papists, which passed before our return ; by which, though the other habits were taken away, the wearing of square caps and sur- plices was yet continued to the clergy, though without any super- stitious conceit, which was expressly guarded against by the terms of the act. This act cannot be repealed unless by the agreement and consent of all the estates of the kingdom, by whose concurrence it was enacted. It was enjoined us, (who had not then any autho- rity either to make laws or repeal them,) either to wear the caps and surplices, or to give place to others. We comphed with this injunction, lest our enemies should take possession of the places deserted by ourselves. But as this matter has occasioned a great strife among us, so that our httle flock has divided itself into two parties, the one thinking that on account of this law the ministry ought to be abandoned, and the other, that it ought not ; I beg of you, my Gualter, to write me at the earliest opportunity what is your opinion of this controversy, which is the only thing that troubles us. We certainly hope to repeal this clause of the act next session ; but if this cannot be eifected, since the papists are forming a secret and powerful opposition, I nevertheless am of opinion that we ought to continue in the ministry, lest, if we desert and reject it upon such grounds, they insinuate themselves [into our places.] For which reason, my Gualter, I await your opinion, whether we can do, what we arc thus doing, with a safe conscience? I am also so anxious about your church, that, as I suspect many faithful ministers have died of the plague, I wish to know by letter from you the names of those who are yet alive. May the Lord Jesus, XCVI ,] BISHOP HORN TO R. GUALTER. 201 the great guardian of his flock, guard you and his universal church ! Farewell in him. Farnham Castle, July 17, 1565. Yours in Christ, Rob. Winton. XCVII. BISHOP PARKHURST TO H. BULLINGER. [A. Go.] LuDHAM, Aug. 18, 1565. I WAS grieved beyond measure at your illness, and I rejoice beyond measure at your recovery. You write me word that you inclosed in your letter to me one directed to [Bishop] Jewel ; and you request me to cause a copy of it to be taken as far as this mark (f ), and to send it to [Bishop] Horn. In truth, my Bul- linger, I have not seen Jewel's letter, so that I can neither comply with your request, nor satisfy Horn's expectation ; for Abel opened my letter, and gave the inclosure to Jewel in London. He pro- mised Abel that he would send mo a copy at the earhest opportu- nity. Any one may be rich in promises, and he promised indeed, but nothing further ; and has thus defrauded both you, and myself, and Horn. But I impute this to the very numerous occupations by which he is distracted. You ask my pardon for having imposed upon me this burden. But I do not esteem it onerous but an honour, if I am able upon any occasion to be of service to BuUinger. When I read to my wife your letter in German, as soon as she heard of the death of your wife and daughter, she burst into a flood of tears. I was therefore obhged for some time to discon- tinue reading, as she was unable to hsten. The queen of Scotland was married, on the 1st of August, to Henry, lord Darnley ^ eldest son of the earl of Lennox. Some of the Scotch nobility^ are by no means favourable to this new con- nection. We are as yet uncertain what will be the consequence. The gospel has certainly taken very deep root in that country. It was reported not long since that our queen was about to marry the duke of Austria. What will be the case, I cannot tell ; but as \} Ho was Mary's cousin-german, by tho lady Margaret Douglas, niece to Henry VIII., and daughter of the carl of Angus, by Margaret, queen of Scotland.] [2 Because the family of Lennox was believed to adhere to the Roman Catholic faith. Randolph, writing to tho earl of Leicester an account of tho queen of Scots' marriage, says of her husband, " I speake leaste of that which I thynk is most earnestlyo intended by this quene and her housbande, when by hym it was lately sayde that ho cared more for the papistes in Englande then he did for tho protestants in Scotlande." MS. Cott. Calig. b. ix. 218.] 202 BISHOP PAKKHUKST TO H. BULLINGER. [lET. soon as I have ascertained the truth, I will let you know. I am expecting your most learned discourses on Daniel. Farewell, my excellent Bullinger, with all your friends, to whom I desire all happiness. May the Lord preserve all the people of Zurich from evil ! Amen. In haste. Ludham, Aug. 18, 1565. My wife salutes you and your friends. Yours from my heart, John Parkhukst, [Bishop] of Norwich. XCVIII. H. BULLINGER TO BISHOP HORN. [A. App. ii.] Dated at Zurich, Nov. 3, 1565. What you write, reverend father in Christ, touching the con- troversy which has arisen among you concerning the vestments of the clergy, I had previously learned from the letter of our common friend, John Abel, to which I have lately replied. It grieved me exceedingly, as it still continues to do, that this occasion is afforded to our adversaries by the mutual dissensions of those among you who preach the purer doctrine of the truth. As however I am most probably unacquainted with all the circumstances, I hesitate to pronounce any opinion upon the subject. But, that I may not seem wanting in my duty, when required by yourself and other friends to declare my sentiments, I will here repeat what I have lately stated in my letter to Abel. I approve the zeal of those persons who would have the church purged from all the dregs of popery ; for I am aware of that passage of the prophet, where God warns us to put away [her} whoredoms out of [her] sight, and [her adulteries] from [between her] breasts. [Hos. ii. 2.] On the other hand, I also commend your prudence, who do not thinlc that churches are to be forsaken because of the vestments [of the clergy]. For since the great end of the ministry is the edification and preservation of the church, we have need of great circumspection, lest we should depart from this, even while we are defending a cause, which in itself is good and holy. Nor are we only to consider what is now the state of that church which we think of forsaking, but also what it will be when we have left it. If it be certain that it will improve, we are at hberty to depart ; but if, on the contrary, it will suffer loss, we are not to give place to wicked and treacherous workmen. But, as far as I can form an opinion, your common adversaries are only aiming at this, that on your removal they may put in your places either papists, or else Lutheran doctors and presidents, who are not very XCVIII.] H. BULLINGER TO BISHOP HORX. 203 much unlike them. Should tliis come to pass, not only will all ecclesiastical order be disturbed, and the number of most absurd ceremonies be increased, but even images (which Ave know are de- fended by the Lutherans) will be restored ; the artolatry ^ in the Lord's supper will be reintroduced ; private absolution, and after this, auricular confession will creep in by degrees ; and an infinite number of other evils will arise, wliich will both occasion confusion in general, and also 'bring into danger many godly individuals. For I doubt not but that you have met with so much success in your ministry, as that you have very many throughout the whole kingdom, both nobility, citizens, husbandmen, men, in short, of every rank and class in society, who are most favourably disposed to rehgion, and who abhor all doctrine that may open the door to superstition and idolatry ; and who would feel it intolerable that a tyranny should again be set up in the church, to burden the con- sciences of the unhappy people. These, if you depart from the helm of the church, will most assuredly be subjected to the rage of their adversaries, who will establish examinations and inquisitions against them, as well public as private ; will accuse them of heresy and sedition, and through them will render the whole cause of religion suspected and hateful, both to her most serene majesty, and all the nobility of the realm. We must therefore carefully guard against their wicked artifices, lest we should yield to them of our own accord what they have now for many years endeavoured to obtain with much labour and diligence. But if any one should ask me whether I approve of those who first enacted, or are now zealous maintainors of, those laws by which the dregs of popery are retained, I candidly and freely answer that I do not approve of them. For they are either acting too imprudently, if thoy are on om' side ; or else they are treacherously laying snares for the liberty of the churches. But although they have obtruded upon you these dregs, as if they were necessary for the worship of God, for a safe conscience, and the salvation of the soul, I should think that every thing ought rather to be submitted to, than that you should suffer a godly people to be led away by them from a pure profession of faith. And since it is expressly provided, as you write me word, in that proclamation, that the square caps and surplices are to be retained without any superstitious conceit, I think that sufficient consideration has, at the same time, been shewn to your consciences. For you are at hberty, [1 Or worshipping: of the bread.] 204 H. BULLINGER TO BISHOP HORN. [ LET. if I am not mistaken, to assign a reason for what you do, to remove any opinion of superstition from every one's mind, and to make a protest that may take away all ground of offence. In the mean- while, let the most serene queen and the illustrious nobles of the realm be instructed, urged and pressed, no longer to stain and defile a reformation, effected with so much praise and with the admiration of the whole world, with dregs and filthiness of this kind, nor to give occasion to the neighbouring churches of Scot- land and France for any suspicion of disunion. I am aware that many questions are raised by some parties respecting the authority of kings and magistrates, whether they ought to make any laws for the church, and whether the clergy are bound to obey such laws. But I do not consider these inquiries of so much consequence in the present case, since, as I have above stated, all conceit of superstition is removed by the words of the proclamation itself. And we must take care, lest, by raising questions before the people respecting the extent of magisterial authority, we should give occasion to some disorders. These things, however, ought to be lawfully discussed in the pubHc assembly of the realm ; and those, who from their situation have it in their power to remind the queen and the nobles of their duty in private, ought by no means to be wanting in their endeavours. I have now stated, reverend father in Christ, what I had to write at this present time, because you were desirous of hearing my sentiments on the question before us. I would by no means burden any man''s conscience; but nevertheless I think that we ought to beware, lest, while we are consulting our own feehngs and reputation as individuals, we should bring the church at large into some grievous peril. And I do not think this opinion of mine is at variance with the mind of Paul, Avho was wont to become all tilings to all men, that he might gain some ; and who thought good to circumcise Timothy, lest he should alienate the Jews of that place from the christian religion, and that he might exercise his ministry with greater advantage ; but who, on other occasions, thought it not fit to yield in the least to those who placed any merit in circumcision itself. But as many as have made the edifi- cation of the church the scope and end of their designs and actions, have not erred in controversies of this kind. I have nothing to write about our own affairs. The Lord so regarded us during the pestilence of the last year, that we did not lose a single minister. One or two died in the country. The plague, indeed, now seems to be skirmishing in some degree in our XCVIII.] H. BULLINGER TO BISHOP HORN. 205 city, but Is not likely to be violent. We are in the Lord's hands ; let his will be done. On the 20th of November there will be a congress of the prmces electors at Worms, in which a consultation will be had concerning the restoration of peace in Germany, and some points of great importance will be discussed respecting the bishops and their reformation. May the great and good God direct by his Spirit the minds and counsels of all parties to his glory and the safety of the church ! My wife desires her most respectful salutations to the honourable lady, your wife. Farewell, reverend father in Christ. Zurich, Nov. 3, 1565. XCIX. BISHOP SANDYS TO H. BULLINGER. [A. GG.'] Worcester, Jan. 3, 1566. Your most courteous letter, my illustrious friend, together with your very learned commentary on the prophet Daniel, has been dehvered to me within these few days by our friend Abel. By the wliich I both rightly perceive your regard for myself, and easily understand how much I owe you in return. That you have written to me in so aifectionate and brotherly a manner, is indeed most gratifying, and I sincerely thank you for it ; but by your conde- scension in sending me this excellent work of yours so enriched with all kinds of learning, and also, which I esteem a singular favour, in sending it forth to the public with my name, you have indeed done me a most particular kindness. Tliis courtesy of yours, by which you are wont to attach to yourself the affections of all who know you, is remarkable towards every one, but towards myself it is peculiar and extraordinary. For you not only received me most kindly, and treated me with the greatest benevolence, when as an exile and wanderer without a home I formerly came to Zurich ; but even now, when by the providence of God I am restored to my country, you not only continue your affection, but strive to shew me honour and respect by every means in your power. When I anxiously reflect with myself what return I can make to vou for your exceeding kindness, 1 can discover nothing whatever to repay you, worthy of such great benefits. Since then your kindness to me is far greater than I can possibly repay on equal terms, inas- much as it has been your part to bestow benefits, mine to receive them, I willingly acknowledge myself your debtor ; and since I .cannot repay you myself, I will intreat Him to repay you, who has fully satisfied for all our debts. In the mean time I have forwarded 206 BISHOP SANDYS TO H. BULLINGEK. [lET. to our friend Abel a token, such as it is, of my affection towards you : he has undertaken that it shall be safely transmitted to you. I earnestly entreat you kindly to accept it, and in your kindness, not to regard the smallness of the gift, but the inclination of the giver. What is doing here, and in what condition our affau's are placed, you will learn from the letters of others. I will mention however what is of the most importance. The true rehgion of Christ is settled among us ; the gospel is not bound, but is freely and faithfully preached. As to other matters, there is not much cause for anxiety. There is some httle dispute about using or not using the popish habits ; but God will put an end to these things also. Farewell, most esteemed Su% and love me, as you do, and remember me in your prayers to God. Salute, I pray you, in my name, masters Gualter, Simler, your son Henry, and the others, my masters and very dear brethren in Christ. Worcester, Jan. 3, 1566. Your most loving brother, Edwin Worcester. C. BISHOP JEWEL TO H. BULLINGER AND L. LAVATER. [A. 67.] Salisbury, Feb. 8, 1566. Much health in Christ Jesus. I write to you, reverend father, and you, my good Lewis, much less frequently than either I desire or you expect. How you will take tliis, I know not ; yet I hope not imldndly ; for the more I feel myself obliged by the kindness of you all, and have always valued your good opinion of me, the less would I desire to be accused by you of forgetfulness or neglect. It may probably appear affected in me to ascribe my long silence to my own occupations ; yet did you know me and my engagements, there would be no need of any other excuse. For in addition to my other incessant troubles, my own and other people's, domestic and public, civil and ecclesiastical, (from which no one in my office can in these times be exempt,) I am compelled, almost alone, to engage with external enemies, shall I call them ? or domestic ones. They are indeed our own countrymen, but enemies in heart, and enemies in the land they dwell in. For our fugitives at Louvaine began during the last year to be in violent commotion, and to write with the greatest asperity against us all. Me alone they have attacked by name. And why so ? you will c] BISHOP JEWEL TO H. BULLINGER AND L. LAVATER. 207 say. I know not, unless it be that they know me to be of all men the most averse from strife, and the most unable to resist. Yet, six years since, when I preached at court ^ before the queen's majesty, and was speaking about the antiquity of the popish reli- gion, I remember that I said this among other things, that our enemies, when they accuse our cause of novelty, both wrong us and deceive the people ; for that they approved new things as if they were old, and condemned as new things of the greatest antiquity ; that their private masses, and theu* mutilated commu- nions, and the natural and real j^resence and transuhstantiation, &c., (in which things the whole of their rehgion is contained,) have no certain and express testimony either of holy scripture, or ancient councils, or fathers, or of any thing that could be called antiquity". At all tliis they were in great indignation : they began to bark in their holes and corners, and to call me an impudent, bold, insolent, and frantic boaster. Four years after one Harding unex- pectedly came forward ; a man who, not very long since, was a hearer and admirer of Peter Martyr, and a most active preacher of the gospel, but is now a wretched apostate, and one whose cha- racter is well known to our friend Juhus. This man would fain refute me out of the Amphilochiuses, Abdiases, Hippolytuses, Clements, Victors, supposititious Athanasiuses, Leontiuses, Cletuses, Anacletuses, the decretal epistles, dreams, and fables. I rephed to him last year, as well as I could. But, gracious heaven, what a life is this ! Oh that strife might perish from among gods and men ! I had scarce finished my work, when there suddenly flies abroad a Coiifutation of my Apology ; an immense and elaborate work, and filled with abuse, contumely, falsehoods and flatteries. Here I am again pelted at. What would you have ? He must be answered -^ You thus perceive, reverend father, that we are far from idle, myself more especially, whose lot it is, I know not by what fatality, to be always battling with these monsters. May the Lord give me strength and com^ago, and beat down Satan under our feet ! I have thought it right to acquaint you at length with {} As bishop Jewel had preached at court this Lent, [1560,] so he had his day at the cross, which was the second Sunday before Easter. In both places ho preached that famous sci-mon, wherein ho openly challenged the papists. Strypo, Annals, i. i. 300. His text was from 1 Cor. xi. 23, &c. Le Bas, p. 91.] [2 i.e. within COO years from the birth of Christ.] [3 And this at length produced his [bishop Jewel's] admirably useful, learned book, entitled his Defence [of the Apology]. Strype, Annals, i. ii. 178.] 208 BISHOP JEWEL TO H. BULLINGER AND L. LAVATER. [lET. these things, that should my letters in future arrive less frequently than either you expect or I wish, you may ascribe it to any thing rather than forgetfulness or ingratitude. Our country is now free from war, and quiet as to matters of religion. Those countrymen of ours at Louvaine disturb us as much as they can ; but our people are faithful to their duty, and I hope wUl continue to be. The queen is in excellent health, and averse from marriage. The last winter so injured the rising corn, that there is now much distress throughout all England from a scarcity of wheat. This year, by the blessing of God, all kinds of grain were most abundant. I have not seen Parkhurst, bishop of Norwich, nor Sandys, bishop of Worcester, nor Pilkington, bishop of Durham, for the last three years ^ ; so completely are we dispersed. We are all, however, safe and well, and Avith a grateful recollection of you. The only one that has died is Richard Chambers^, who departed piously in the Lord. The contest respecting the hnen surphce, about which I doubt not but you have heard either from our friend Abel or Parkhurst, is not yet at rest. That matter still somewhat disturbs weak minds ^. And I wish that all, even the shghtest vestiges of popery might be removed from our churches, and above all from our minds. But the queen at this time is unable to endure the least alteration in matters of religion. The affairs of Scotland are not yet quite settled. Some of their leading nobility are exiles among us ; others have remained at home, and are preparing for resistance in case of any attempted violence ; and from time to time sally forth from their castles, and [1 i.e. since the last synod.] [2 Eichard Chambers was one of the exiles at Frankfort, and with Grindal was an agent to the Strasburgh exiles to treat with those at Frankfort about the English service book in 1554. Strype, Life of Grindal, p. 14.] [3 The fti'st bishops that were made, and who were but newly returned out of their exiles, as Cox, Grindal, Horn, Sandys, Jewel, Parkhurst, Ben- tham, upon their first returns, before they entered upon their ministry, laboured all they could against receiving into the church the papistical habits, and that all the ceremonies should be clean laid aside. But they could not obtain it from the queen and the parliament ; and the habits were enacted. Then they consulted together what to do, being in some doubt whether to enter into their functions. But they concluded unanimously not to desert their ministry for some rites, that, as they considered, were but a few, and not evil in themselves, especially since the doctrine of the gospel remained pure and entire. Strype, Annals, i. i. 263.] C.J BISHOP JEWEL TO H. BULLINGER AND L. LAVATER. 209 drive off and carry away what they can from the lands of the papists. The queen herself, though obstinately devoted to popery, hardly knows where to turn. For with regard to rehgion, she has a great part both of the nobility^ and people against her ; and, as far as we can learn, the number is daily increasing. Within these few days king Philip privately sent thither a certain Italian abbot, with Spanish gold ; a crafty man, and trained for intrigue. His business was to aid the king and queen with his subtle advice, and to throw everything into confusion. The new king, who had hitherto abstained from going to mass, and had of his own accord attended the sermons for the sake of popularity, when he first heard of the ship being expected to arrive on the morrow, became on a sudden more confident, and having taken courage, would no longer play the hypocrite. He went to church, and ordered mass to be said before him as usual. At that very time Knox, who is a preacher in the same town, and in the next church, was declaim- ing with his accustomed boldness, before a crowded congregation, against the mad idolatries, and the whole pontifical dominion. In the mean time this ship of king Philip, tossed about by the winds and tempests, shattered and broken by the waves, with its mast sprung, its timbers stove in, the pilots lost, bereft of crew and cargo, is driven, a mere wreck, and filled with water, upon the coast of England. I doubt not but that this has happened by divine providence, to teach the infatuated king what a dangerous thing it is to hear mass. There is a report of great disorders in France. That house of Guise can never rest without some o;reat mischief. But these things are much nearer you than ourselves. The Dane and Swede have had some bloody battles with each other, and are reported to be still in arms\ Each of them has sustained much loss, nor can it be yet determined which is superior. Your books, yours, my reverend father, on Daniel, and yours, my learned Lewis, on Joshua, have reached me in safety. I both thank our gracious and almighty God for you, and you for these [4 "The duke, the erles of Argile, Murray, and Rothoss, with sundry barons, are joynid together not to allow of the mariadg otherwise than to have the religion stablished by law, but the queue refuseth in this sort ; she will not suffer it to have the force of law but of permission to cveiy man to lyve according to his conscience ; and herewith she hath reteyncd a great nombre of protcstants from associating oppenly with the other." Cecil to Sir T. Smith, Aug. 21, 1565. MS. Lansd. 102. 62. See Ellis's Original Letters.] [5 See above, p. 185, note 5.] 14 210 BISHOP JEWEL TO H. BULLINGER AND L. LAVATER. [lET. labours and studies, and for all your kindness, I have sent here- with twenty crowns to our friend Julius for his yearly stipend, and the same sum to you two, that you may expend them, as is usual, either upon a public entertainment, or for any other purpose you may prefer. May God preserve in safety yourselves, the church, your state, and school ! Salute in my name masters Gualter, Simler, Zuinglius, Gesner, Wickius, Haller, Henry and Rodolph Bullinger." Salisbury, Feb. 8, 1566. Your attached and devoted in the Lord, John Jewel, Anglus. CI. L. HUMPHREY TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 68.] Oxford, Feb. 9, 1566. I CONGRATULATE you, reverend father in Christ, ourselves, and the church, that you are recovered from the long disease with which you were afflicted, and are now, by the blessing of God, raised up again and restored to health. And I pray again and again, that you may be strengthened more and more. Your lucubrations on Daniel, together with the preface and honourable mention both of myself and my brother exiles, I saw and perused with great pleasure, and gratefully acknowledge your kindness. I am glad that you promise to comment upon Isaiah^ and earnestly entreat you, with the help of the Lord, to persevere and finish the work you have begun. The book is altogether evangelical, full of mysteries, and in some parts, by reason of the concise structure of the sentences, and intermixture of history, and frequent figurative language, and some interruptions, rather obscure. Wherefore, though some excellent and learned men have thrown great light upon it, and have diligently laboured in the illustration of it, yet the addition of your own labour will be both pious and profitable. In the third chapter, where the prophet is discoursing about ornaments and female attire, should you think fit to insert any thing respecting this affair of the habits, it would in my opinion be worth your while. I am not ignorant of what you have already written ; but you seem to have expressed your sentiments too briefly, and without sufficient perspicuity. Wherefore I again and again entreat your piety to reply in few words to those little ques- tions of mine' ; first, whether laws respecting habits may properly \} These questions arc given with a little variation by Strype, Annals, i. ii. 137. Bullingei-'s reply is given, Annals, i. ii. 605, and below, Letter CIV. p. 214.] CI.] L. HUMPHREY TO H. BULLINGER. 211 be prescribed to churchmen, so as to distinguish them from the laity in shape, colour, &c. ? Secondly, whether the ceremonial worship of the Le^dtical priesthood is to be reintroduced into the church of Christ ? Thirdly, whether in respect of habits and external rites, it is allowable to have any thing in common with the papists, and whether Christians may borrow ceremonies from any counterfeit and hostile church ? Fourthly, whether the distinguish- ing apparel of the priesthood is to be worn [upon all occasions] Uke a common dress? Whether this does not savour of monkery, popery, and Judaism ? Fifthly, whether those persons who have till now enjoyed their liberty, can with a safe conscience, by the authority of a royal edict, involve in this bondage both themselves and the church ? Sixthly, whether the clerical dress of the papists may be regarded as a matter of indifference ? Seventhly, whether the habit is to be worn, rather than the office deserted ? I had sent both to master Beza and yourself some other questions ; I know not whether you received them. I entreat you to conde- scend to explain your judgment and opinion a little more fully as soon as possible ; and also to touch upon and note the reasons upon which it is founded. You see that it is the Lernsean Hydra, or the tail of popery. You see too what the relics of the Amorites have produced. You see my importunity. Confer, I beseech you, on the whole matter with master Gualter and your colleagues, and write their opinion either to me or master Sampson. Oxford, Feb. 9, 1565, according to the English computation^. May Christ long preserve you to liis church in health and happiness ! Your most attached, Laurence Humphrey. CII. T. SAMPSON TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 69.] London, Feb. 10, 15(16. Reverend father in Christ, I Avi'ote you a letter six months since, and should have satisfied the wishes of many of my brethren, if, as I then earnestly requested, I had received an answer from your worthiness. But since either my letter was not dehvered to you, or yours (if you have written any) appears to have been intercepted, I am under the necessity of repeating what I before stated. [2 Until the introduction of the new style, a.d. 1752, the year in England commenced from the 25th of March.] 14—2 212 T. SAMPSON TO H. BULLINGER. [lET. Our church remains in the same condition as was long since reported to you. For, after the expiration of seven years in the profession of the gospel, there has now been revived that contest about habits, in which Cranmer, Ridley, and Hooper, most holy martyrs of Christ, were formerly wont to skirmish. The state of the question, however, is not in all respects the same, but the deter- mination of those in power is more inflexible. This indeed is very gratifying to our adversaries at Louvaine, for they praise these things up to the skies. But that you may more readily understand the matter in con- troversy, I have thdught it best to reduce it into certain questions, which are these : I. Whether a peculiar habit, distinct from that of the laity, were ever assigned to the ministers of the gospel in better times, and whether it ought now to be assigned to them in the reformed church ? II. Whether the prescribing habits of this kind be consistent with ecclesiastical and christian hberty ? III. Whether the nature of things indifferent admits of coer- cion ; and whether any violence should be offered to the consciences of the many who are not yet persuaded ? IV. AVhether any new ceremonies may be instituted, or super- added to what is expressly commanded in the word ? V. Whether it be lawful to revive the Jewish ceremonies respecting the habit of the priesthood, and which were aboUshed by Christ ? VI. Whether it be expedient to borrow rites from idolaters or heretics, and to transfer such as are especially dedicated to their sect and religion to the use of the reformed church ? VII. Whether conformity and general agreement must of necessity be required in ceremonies of tliis kind ? VIII. Whether those ceremonies may be retained which occa- sion evident offence ? IX. Whether any ecclesiastical constitutions may be tolerated, which, though from their nature they are free from any thing im- pious, do not, nevertheless, tend to edification? X. Whether any thing of a ceremonial nature may be pre- scribed to the church by the sovereign, without the assent and free concurrence of churchmen ? XI. Whether a man ought thus to obey the decrees of the church ; or on account of non-compliance, supposing there is no alternative, to be cast out of the ministry ? CII.] T. SAMPSON TO H. BULLINGEK. 213 XII. Whether good pastors, of unblemished life and doctrine, may rightfully be removed from the ministry on account of their non-compliance with such ceremonies ? Here you have, most esteemed sir, our difficulties. Here many pious men are hesitating ; for the sake of whom I again ask it as a favour from you, that, having well considered the matter with master Gualter and the rest of your colleagues, with your wonted piety, you will plainly state your opinion, and send a written answer to each of the above questions. You will confer an exceed- ing kindness upon many, and on myself especially ; and you will also confer an excellent benefit upon our church. There is also another subject about which I desire to acquaint you. On the decease of our friend Chambers \ there were entrusted to me some writings, which were, it seems, once much valued by master Hooper. Among others I found a copious manuscript com- mentary of master Theodore Bibhander^ upon Genesis and Exodus. Since this book, as far as I am aware, was never printed, I am unwilling that the church of Christ should be any longer deprived of so great a benefit. If your worship will inform the heirs of master Bibliander that this writing is in my possession, and they are willing to publish it, let me know to whom I shall transfer it, or by what means it may be sent over to you with safety, and you will find me most ready to execute your wishes. These are the subjects on which I shall be daily expecting an answer ; and as to the questions especially, I humbly ask you, on behalf of many per- sons, to declare to us both your own opinion, and that of your bre- thren. May God Almighty very long preserve you to his church in life and health ! London, Feb. 16, 1566. Your worship's most devoted, Thomas Sampson. cm. BISHOP JEWEL TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 70."I Salisbury, Mcn-ch 10, 15GG. Much health in Christ. Although I have written to you, my reverend father, at great length within these few days, yet having met with some things in which I have great need of your judgment, [1 Seo p. 208.] [2 The proper name of this divine was Theodore Buchmann, which he translated into Greek, according to the usual practice of scholars in that age. He succeeded Zuingle as professor of Theology at Zui-ich, where he died of the plague in 1564.] 214) BISHOP JEWEL TO H. BULLINGER. [lET. I thought it would not bo out of place for me to write again. The things are of such a nature, that I doubt not, but that from your multifarious learning you will easily be able to afford me the infor- mation I require. I wish to know, whether those Christians who are at the pre- sent time scattered throughout Greece, Asia, Syria, Armenia, &c. use private masses, such as are every where customary among the papists ; and what kind of masses, private or public, are now in use among the Greeks at Venice ? Again, a certain Camotensis^ is sometimes quoted, as having written Avith asperity against the lives and insolence of the popes. Who was this Camotensis, of what order, and in what time and country did he live ? Lastly, what is your opinion respecting that German council^, which is said to have been formerly held under Charlemagne, against the second Nicene council concerning images ? For there are some persons who confidently deny such council ever to have existed. I ask it of your kindness not to think me impertinent in making these inquiries of you, especially at so great a distance ; for you are almost the only remaining oracle of the churches. If you will write me an answer by the next fair, it will be sufficient. Again and again farewell, my revered father, and much esteemed master in Christ. Salisbury, March 10, 1566. Yours in Christ, John Jewel, Anglus. CIV. H. BULLINGER TO L. HUMPHREY AND T. SAMPSON. [A. App. iii.] Dated at Zurich, May 1, 1566. ]May the Lord Jesus bless you, most accomplished sirs, and very dear brethren, and preserve you from all evil ! [1 There is here a mistake in the name. "Jewel was gravely charged by Harding with naming Johannes Camotensis for Johannes Camotensis," whom Mr Le Bas has shewn to be the celebrated John of Salisbm-y, who towards the close of his life was promoted to the see of Chartres, and was therefore sometimes entitled Johannes Camotensis. Lo Bas, Life of Jewel, p. 159. He flourished in the last half of the twelfth century.] [2 This council was convoked at Frankfort by Chariemagne, a.d. 794; and condemned, unanimously and strongly, the service and adoration of images. Lo Bas, ut sup. p. 160. This too was in spite of a letter of pope Adrian in vindication of image-worship, and directed to Charlemagne himself. There were 300 bishops of France, Italy, and Germany. The pope's legates were present, and it is considered in France as a general council. Du Pin, Bib- liotheque, Tom. vi. p. 15G. Paris. 1693.] CIV.] H. BULLINGER TO L. HUMPHREY AND T. SAMPSON. 215 I have received your letters ^ from which I learn, Laurence, that you complain that my reply to your question appears too concise. But, my brother, I neither perceived at that time, nor do I now perceive, the necessity of writing more copiously. For you only inquired what was my opinion with respect to the vestiarian controversy now agitated in England. To this question I thought it best to give you a short answer ; for I could express my sen- timents in few words. Besides, I was aware that master Peter Martyr, of blessed memory, had both here and at Oxford frequently and fully handled the same question, and I had nothing to add to his remarks. But I remember, that in my letter addressed to you, my brother Sampson, I also gave a statement of my own opinion. And to repeat my sentiments in few words, I could never approve of your officiating, if so commanded, at an altar laden, rather than adorned, with the image of him that was crucified, and in the appropriate dress of the mass, that is, in the alb and cope, on the back part of which also the same image is represented. But, as far as I can understand by a letter from England, there is now no dispute concerning habits of this kind ; but the question is, whether it be lawful for the ministers of the gospel to wear a round or square cap, and a white garment which they call a surplice, by the wearing of which the minister may be distinguished from the people ? And, whether it be a duty rather to relinquish the ministry, or sacred office, than to wear vestments of this kind ? I replied to this question at the last fair, in a letter to the reverend master doctor Robert Horn, bishop of Winchester, and briefly re- peated the words of master Martyr. My colleague and very dear relative, master Rodolph Gualter, had Avritten to the same person a short time before ; a copy of which letter I send to yourself and our other brethren, inclosed in this. If, therefore, you are disposed to listen to us, and desire our opinion respecting the vestiarian con- troversy, as you signified to me in your last letter, behold ! you possess our opinion in this epistle : in which if you are unable to acquiesce, we are indeed most exceedingly grieved ; and since we have no other advice to ofi^er, we heartily and continually pray the Lord, who is under all circumstances and at all times to be looked up to, that by his grace and power he may provide a remedy for this afflictive state of things. Some questions, my brother Laurence, have been proposed by yourself, but our brother Sampson has framed a greater number [3 See above, Letters CI. and CIL, to both of which Bullinger replies in this letter.] 216 H. BULLINGER TO L. HUMPHREY AND T. SAMPSON. [lET. upon the same subject. But although in my homely simphcity 1 could never approve of the subject being divided into so many questions, and entangled in such complicated knots, which otherwise, simple in itself, might be stated with sujQacient perspicuity in few words ; yet I will remark somewhat upon each question, that in this matter also I may be of service to you, my honoured masters and very dear brethren, as far as my lack of utterance, and power of perception rather blunted than sharpened, will permit me. And I entreat you to receive with kindness these remarks from me, your brother, and who love you so much ; and to judge respecting them with a mind calm and free from prejudice. I altogether abominate all controversy, and I implore nothing more supphantly from the Lord, than that he may take away from the church those contentions which from the beginning, and at all times, have been most injurious to true piety, and torn the church, however peaceful and flourisliing, in pieces. 1. To the question, whether laws respecting habits ought to be prescribed to ecclesiastics, that they may be distinguished by them from the laity, I reply, that there is an ambiguity in the word ought. For if it is taken as implying what is necessary and appertaining to salvation, I do not think that even the authors of the laws themselves intend such an interpretation. But if it is asserted, that for the sake of decency, and comeliness of appear- ance, or dignity and order, some such regulation may be made, or some such thing be understood, as that which the apostle requires, namely, that a bishop or minister of the church should be /coo-^itos, (I mean decent or orderly,) I do not see how he is to blame, who either adopts a habit of this sort himself, or who commands it to be worn by others. 2. Whether the ceremonial worship of the Levitical priest- hood is to be reintroduced into the church ? I reply, if a cap and habit not unbecoming a minister, and free from superstition, are commanded to be used by the clergy, no one can reasonably assert that Judaism is revived. Moreover, I will here repeat the answer that I see doctor Martyr made to this question, who, after having shewed that the sacraments of the old law had been abohshed, and ought not to be reintroduced into the church of Christ, wliich has [those of] baptism and the Lord's supper, subjoined, " there were notwithstanding in the Levitical law some ordinances of such a character, as that they cannot properly be called sacraments ; for they served unto decency and order, and a certain becomingness, which, as agreeable to the light of nature, and furthering some CIV.] H. BULLINGER TO L. HUMPHREY AND T. SAMPSON. 217 utility of ours, I judge, may not only be restored but retained. Who seeth not that the apostles for quietness sake, and for the better living together of believers, commanded the gentiles to abstain from things strangled and from blood ? These things were beyond dispute legal and Levitical. Also, no man is ignorant that at this day tithes are instituted in many places for the support of ministers. It is most evident too, that psalms and hymns are sung in the holy assemblies, which nevertheless the Levites also practised. And, not to omit this, we have feast days in remembrance of our Lord's resurrection, and other things. Are all these things to be abolished because they are traces of the old law ? You see then, that all the Levitical rites are not to be so abrogated, as that none of them may be lawfully retained." Thus far Peter Martyr'. 3. Whether is it alloivahle to have a habit in common ivith papists ? I answer, it is not yet proved that the pope introduced a distinction of habits into the church ; so far from it, that it is clear that such distinction is long anterior to popery. Nor do I see why it should be unlawful to use, in common with papists, a vestment not superstitious, but pertaining to civil regulation and good order. If it were not allowable to have any thing in common with them, it would be necessary to desert all the churches, to decline the receipt of stipend, to abstain from baptism, and the reciting of the apostles' and the Nicene creed, and even to reject the Lord's prayer. But after all, you do not borrow any cere- monies from them ; for the use of the habits was never set aside from the beginning of the reformation ; and it is still retained, not by any popish enactment, but by virtue of the royal edict, as a matter of indifference and of civil order. 4. The use^ therefore of a distinctive cap or habit in civil matters savours neither of Judaism nor monachism ; for they affect to appear separated from civil life, and make a merit of their peculiar dress. Thus Eustathius, bishop of Sebastia^, was con- demned, not merely on account of his peculiar dress, but because he made religion to consist in that dress. The canons of the [1 The epistle from whence the above passage is quoted, is dated from Oxford, Nov. 4, 1550, and seems to have been written to Hooper, althouo-h there is no name put thereto. See Martyr's Divine Epistles, at the end of his Common Places.] [2 For Humphrey's fourth question, to which this paragraph is an answer, see above, p. 211.] [3 Du Pin states that the Eustathius, whose en-ors were condemned at the council of Gangra, was a different person from the bishop of Sebastia. See below, p. 235, note 2.] 218 H. BULLINGER TO L. HUMPHREY AND T. SAMPSON. [lET. councils of Gangra, Laodicea, and the sixth synod are known. And if some of the people are led to believe that this savours of popery, Judaism, and monacliism, let them be admonished and rightly instructed in these matters. And should any be disquieted by the importunate clamours of some individuals, lavishly poured forth upon this subject among the people, let those who act thus have a care, lest they should impose heavier burdens upon themselves, irritate the queen's majesty, and end by bringing many faithful ministers into dangers from which they will hardly escape. 5. To the question, whether those persons who have till noiv enjoyed their liberty, can with a safe conscience, by the authority of a royal edict, involve in this bondage both themselves and the church, I reply, that in my opinion great caution is to be observed lest this dispute, and clamour, and contention respecting the habits, should be conducted with too much bitterness, and by tliis impor- tunity a handle should be afforded to the queen's majesty to leave that no longer a matter of choice to those who have abused their hberty ; but being irritated by these needless clamours, she may issue her orders, that either these habits must be adopted, or the ministry relinquished. It appears indeed most extraordinary to me, (if I may be allowed, most accomphshed and very dear bre- thren, to speak my sentiments without offence,) that you can persuade yourselves that you cannot, with a safe conscience, subject yourselves and churches to vestiarian bondage ; and that you do not rather consider, to what kind of bondage you will subject your- selves and churches, if you refuse to comply with a civil ordinance, which is a matter of indifference, and are perpetually contending in this troublesome way ; because, by the rehnquishment of your office, you will expose the churches to wolves, or at least to teachers who are far from competent, and who are not equally fitted with your- selves for the instruction of the people. And can you be said ta have asserted the liberty of the churches, who minister occasion of oppressing the church with burdens even yet more grievous ? Are you not aware of what is the object of many, in what manner they are affected towards the preaching of the gospel, of what character will be those who are to succeed you, and what is to be expected from them ? 6. Whether the dress of the clergy is a matter of indif- ference ? It certainly seems such, when it is a matter of civil ordinance, and has respect only to decency and order, in which things religious worship does not consist. Thus, my most learned and dearly beloved brother, Laurence, CIV.] H. BULLINGER TO L. PHUMHREY AND T. SAMPSON. 219 have I thought fit briefly to reply to your letter. I now come also to the questions of our friend master Sampson, in the discussion of wliich I shall probably be yet more brief. 1. WJiether a peculiar habit, distinct from that of the laity, were ever assigned to the ministers of the church ; and whether it ought now to he assigned to them in the reformed church ? I reply : that there was in the primitive church a habit pecuUar to the priests, is manifest from the ecclesiastical history of Theodoret, Book II. chap. 27, and of Socrates, Book vi. chap. 22 ^ And no one who has but cursorily considered the monuments of antiquity, can be ignorant that the ministers always wore the ijallium upon sacred occasions ; so that, as I have before intimated, the distinction of habit does not derive its origin from the pope. Eusebius truly bears witness from the most ancient writers, that the apostle John at Ephesus wore on his forehead a petalum~, or pontificial plate [of gold] ; and Pontius, the deacon, relates of the martyr Cyprian, that when he was about to present his neck to the executioner, he first gave him his hirrus^, and his dalmatic^ to the deacon, and [1 The following is the story to which Bullinger refers. Sisinius, the Novatian bishop, going one day to visit Arsacius, bishop of Constantinople, one of the clergy asked him why he wore a garment which did not become a bishop ? and, where it was written that a priest ought to be clothed in white? To whom he replied. Yon first shew me where it is written, that a bishop ought to be clothed in black ? See Bingham's Antiquities, Book vi. ch. 4. §. 18.] [2 The petalunt, was the name given to the thin plate of gold which the Jewish high priest wore on his forehead. See below, p. 236.] [3 The birrus, says Mr Bingham, was not peculiar to bishops, nor yet to the clergy, and was no more than the common tunica or coat worn generally by Christians in Africa, as may appear from a canon of the council of Gan- gra, made against Eustathius the heretic and his followers, who condemned the common habit, the birrus, and brought in the use of a strange habit in its room. The canon runs in these words : El' tis dvdpcov 8ia voni^ofiein^v aaKr)(nv irepijBoXaia ;^p^rat, Kui cos av sk tovtov tt^v biKaLocrvvqv e^o)!/ Karayp^r]- (j)icroi.TO Ta>v fier evXaf3eias tovs ^ijpovs (popovvT(ov, Koi rfj aXXr] Koivfj Koi iv avvrjOeia ova-rj eadrjri *ce;(p7;/xei/a)i', dvadefia eVrco. " If any man uses the pal- lium, or cloke, upon the account of an ascetic life, and, as if there were some holiness in that, condemns those that with reverence use the birrus and other garments that are commonly worn, let him be anathema." Bingham, as above, ^. 19.] [4 There were two kinds of tunica, the dalmatica and coUobium, the latter being a short coat without long sleeves ; whereas the dalmatica was the tunica manicata et talaris, a long coat with sleeves down to the wrists. This was seldom in use among the Romans ; for Lampi-idius notes it as a singular thing in the life of the emperor Commodus, that dalmaticatus in 220 H. BULLINGER TO L. HUMPHREY AND T. SAMPSON. [lET. thus stood forth wearing only his hnen garment. Besides, Chry- sostom makes mention of the white garment of the clergy ; and it is certain, that when Christians were converted from heathenism to the gospel and the church, they exchanged the toga for the pallium, on which account when they were ridiculed by unbelievers, Ter- tulhan^ composed his most learned treatise de pallio. I could produce many other instances of the same kind, did not these suffice. I should prefer indeed, that no difficulties had been thrown in the way of the clergy, and that they might have been at liberty to follow the practice of the apostles. But since the queen's majesty only enjoins the wearing a cap and surplice, which, as I have often repeated, she does not in any way make a matter of rehgion ; and since the same things were in use among the ancients, when the affairs of the church were yet more prosperous than at present, and this too without superstition or any thing to find fault with ; I could wish that pious ministers would not make the whole advancement of religion to depend upon this matter, as if it were all in all ; but that they would yield somewhat to the present time, and not dispute oifensively about a matter of indifference, but modestly conclude that these things may be endured at present, but that an improvement will take place in time. For those persons come the nearest to apostolic simplicity, who are unconscious of these distinctions, or who do not urge them, while yet they do not act without a proper regard to disciphne in the mean time. 2, 3. Whether the j)''' ascribing habits be consistent with christian liberty ? I answer, that matters of indifference admit sometimes of prescription, and therefore of being imposed by force, as far as their use, so to speak, though not their moral effect is concerned ; so that, for instance, something which is in its nature indifferent, may be obtruded upon the conscience as necessary, and thus made a matter of religion. In fact, the times and places of publico processit, he wore a dalmatica in public. This, Mr Bingham thinks, is a good argument to prove that the clergy of this age did not wear the dal- matica in public, since it was not then the common garment of the Romans. And he approves of the conjecture of bishop Fell, who thinks that in the passage from Pontius the deacon, (given below. Letter CIX. p. 236, note 2) for the words tunicam tulit, some officious modern transcribers changed the word tunicam into dalmaticam, (as BuUinger appears to have read it), as being more agreeable to the language and custom of their own time, when the dal- matica was reckoned among the sacred vestments of the church, though we never find it mentioned as such in any ancient author. Bingham, as above, §- 20.] [1 See below. Letter CIX. p. 236, note 4.] CIV.] H. BULUNGER TO L. HUMPHREY AND T. SAMPSON. 221 religious assemblies are assuredly regarded among things indifferent ; and yet, if there is no 2^'*^^scription in such cases, consider, I pray, -what confusion and disorder would ensue ? 4. Whether any new ceremonies may he superadded to what is expressly prescribed in the word of God ? I answer, that I by no means approve the addition of new ceremonies ; but yet I am not prepared to deny that some may lawfully be instituted, provided the worship of God is not made to consist in them, and that they are appointed only for the sake of order and discipline. Christ himself observed the feast or ceremony of the dedication, though we do not read that this feast was prescribed in the law. On the whole, the greater part of the propositions or questions touching the vestiarian controversy turn upon this, whether laws concerning habits may or ought to be framed in the church ? And it recalls the general question, namely, what regulations is it lawful to make concerning ceremonies ? To these propositions I reply in few words, that though I would rather no ceremonies, excepting such as are necessary, should be obtruded upon the church, yet I must confess in the mean time that regulations respecting them, though possibly not altogether necessary, and sometimes, it may be, useless, ought not forthwith to be condemned as impious, and to excite disorder and schism in the church ; seeing that they are not of a superstitious character, and also that in their very nature they are matters of indifference. 5, 6. Whether it be lawful to revive the antiquated cere- monies of tlie Jews, and to transfer such as were especially dedicated to the religion of idolaters, to the use of the reformed churches ? I have before replied to this question, when I re- marked touching the Levitical rites. But 1 should be loth that any idolatrous rites should be transferred to the reformed churches, without being purified from what is amiss in them. But it mio-ht also be demanded on the other hand, whether established cere- monies, void of superstition, may not be retained in the church without any impropriety, for the sake of discipline and order. 7. Whether conformity must of necessity be required in cere- 'monies ? I reply, that conformity in ceremonies is perhaps not necessary in every church. Meantime however, if a thing is com- manded, which, though not necessary, is on the other hand not sinful ; the church, it seems to me, ought not on this account to bo relinquished. There was not conformity in rites in all the more ancient churches ; those, however, which adopted rites in confor- mity with each other, did not censure those who wanted such con- 222 H. BULLINGER TO h. HUMPHREY AND T. SAMPSON. [lET. formity^. And I can easily believe that wise and politic men are urgent for a conformity of rites, because they think it will tend to concord, and that there may be one and the same church through- out all England ; wherein, provided nothing sinful is intermixed, I do not see why you should oppose yourselves with hostility to harmless regulations of that kind. 8. Whether those ceremonies may be retained which occasion evident offence ? I answer, that we ought to avoid offence ; but we must take care in the mean time, lest we cloke our own feelings under the pretext of offence. You are not ignorant that one thing is given, and another thing received ; and that offence is readily taken. I am not now inquiring whether you can, without grievous offence, desert, for a thing in itself indifferent, those churches for which Christ died. 9. Whether any constitutions may be tolerated in the churchy which in their nature indeed are not impious, but do not, never- theless, tend to edification ? I answer, that if those constitutions which the queen's majesty wishes to impose upon you, are free from any impiety, they are rather to be tolerated than that the churches should be deserted. For if the edifying of the church is the chief thing to be regarded in this matter, we shall do the church a greater injury by deserting it than by wearing the habits. And where there is no impiety, and the conscience is not wounded, it is proper to submit, even if some degree of bondage be imposed. In the mean time, however, it might be demanded on the other hand, whether the imposition of the habits, as far as it tends to decency and order, may justly come under the denomination of bondage ? 10. Whether any thing of a ceremonial nature may be pre- scribed to the church by the sovereign, without the consent and free concurrence of the clergy ? I answer, if the consent of the clergy is always to be waited for by the sovereign, it is probable that those most wise and pious kings, Asa, Hezekiah, Jehoshaphat, and Josiah, and other godly princes, would never have brought into proper order the Levites and ministers of the churches. Though I would not altogether have the bishops excluded from the consul- tations of churchmen. But on the other hand, I would not have them assume to themselves that power, which they heretofore usurped over kings and magistrates in the time of popery. Nor \} This statement may be compared with the 34th article of the church of England, as also with the preface to the Litiu'gy respecting ceremonies, why some be abolished and some retained.] CIV.] H. BaLLlNGER TO L. HUMPHREY AND T. SAMPSON. 223 again, would I have the bishops sanction by their silence the unjust ordinances of princes. 11, 12. The last two questions come more closely to the point. Whether it is more expedient thus to obey the church, or on account of disobedience to be cast out of the ministry ? And, whether good pastors m,ay laivfidly be removed from the Tninistry on account of their non-compliance ivith such ceremonies ? I answer, if in these ceremonies there is no superstition, no impiety, but yet they are imposed upon godly pastors, who would rather that they should not be imposed upon them ; I will certainly aUow, and that most fully, that a burden and bondage is imposed upon them ; but I will not allow, and this for most just reasons, that their station or ministry is on that account to be deserted, and place given to wolves, as was before observed, or to ministers less quahfied than themselves : especially, since there remains the liberty of preaching, and care may be taken that no greater bondage shall be imposed ; with many other tilings of this kind, &c. I have now stated what it seemed to me might be said upon the proposed questions, being well aware that others, in proportion to their erudition, might have discussed the subject with far greater elegance and effect ; but since it was yom* wish that I myself should answer them, I have done what I could, leaving both a free pen and an unfettered opinion upon these matters to others. As to what remains, I wish not to force and entangle the conscience of any one by what I have written, but merely propose it for consi- deration ; and I would have you beware, lest any one in this pre- sent controversy should conceal a contentious spirit under the name of conscience. And I also exhort you all, by Jesus Christ our Lord, the Saviour, head, and king of his church, that every one of you should duly consider with himself, whether he will not more edify the church of Christ by regarding the use of habits for the sake of order and decency, as a matter of indifference, and which hitherto has tended somewhat to the harmony and advantage of the church ; than by leaving the church, on account of the vestia- rian controversy, to be occupied hereafter, if not by evident wolves, at least by ill-qualified and evil ministers. May the Lord Jesus give you to see, to understand, and to follow what makes for his glory, and the peace and safety of the church ! Farewell in the Lord, together with all faithful ministers. We will earnestly pray the Lord for you, that you may both perceive and do what is holy and beneficial. Master Gualter salutes you 224j h. bullinger to l. Humphrey and t. sampson. [let- most affectionately, and prays for you every happiness. We too, the other ministers, do the same. Zurich, May 1, 1566. Henry Bullinger, minister of the church of Zurich, in his own name and that of Gualter. P.S. I would advise you, my dear Sampson, not to pubhsh any thing of master Bibhander's ; as the papers in your possession are mere collections from his hearers, and not written by Bibliander himself. For his executors are in possession of his commentaries, his manuscript notes on the Bible, or on the old Testament f and they would be very angry if any thing were to be pubhshed under his name, which he himself had not written. Meanwhile, I have to thank your kindness for acquainting me with these things. But your letter, written on the 16th of February, was only deUvered to me on the 26th of April. CV. H. BULLINGER TO BISHOPS HORN, GRINDAL, AND PARKHURST. [A. App. iv.] Zurich, May 3, 15C6. Reverend sirs, right honourable lords, and very dear bre- thren. May the Lord Jesus bless you, and preserve you from all evil ! We send our letter on the vestiarian controversy, written by us to the learned men, and our honoured godly brethren, N. and M. And we send it to you on this account, that ye may under- stand that we would not have any private communication with the brethren, without the knowledge of you, the principal ministers ; and that in all things we seek the peace of your churches, accord- ing to our power. We pray also the Lord, that he may always direct your affairs, and preserve you in peace. We exhort you, reverend sirs, and very dear brethren, to have respect to faithful ministers and learned men. They have their own feelings ; whence the apostle has instructed us to hear one another's burdens. Your authority can effect much with her most serene highness, the queen. Prevail upon her majesty to grant that these worthy brethren may be reconciled and restored. We entreat likewise that you, master Horn, our honoured lord and very dear brother, to whom this letter will first be presented, will forthwith take care that it may be forwarded to the bishop of JS^orwich, and that you will communicate it to masters Jewel, CV.] H. BDLLINGER TO BISHOPS HORN, GRINDAL, AND PARKHURST. 225 Sandys, and Pilkington ; to all of whom, God willing, I will write at the next Frankfort fair. I have written this in the greatest haste, both in my own name and that of Gualter, and we send the letter to Basle to be forwarded from thence to Antwerp. We earnestly entreat you to let us know whether you have received it. Farewell, reverend sirs, and may the Lord bless both you and your labours ! Zurich, May 3, 1566. Yours, BULLINGER. We pray you, reverend master Horn, to communicate this letter also to the illustrious personage, Edmund Grindal, bishop of London, whom, although he is not personally known to us, as you are, we love, and desire to be loved by him in return. Again and again, farewell. CVI. J. ABEL TO H. BULLINGER. [B. 49.*] London, June 6, 1566. Praise to God ! My friendly greeting and willing service to you, my kind and dear sir. Your last letter of March 20th has come duly to hand ; from which I understand that you have received my former letters. I have also received two copies of your Swiss Confession of Faith ; one of which, Avritten in Latin, I have, according to your request, given to master Richard Hilles, who expresses his best thanks. This book pleases me and many behoving hearts exceedingly. But I am still more dehghted with your house-book \ containing fifty of your sermons, and bearing the Latin title Decades Bidlingeri. In this book all the articles of our christian faith are fidly declared and set forth, and it is comforting, and agreeable, and instructive to me to read it. Your letters to master Horn, bishop of Winchester, and masters Jewel and Parkhurst, I have duly forwarded ; and master Horn has written me word that he has received your said letter^, in which you have declared your judgment respecting the cap and surplice. And he has promised me a copy of that letter, wliich has been of great service to many godly preachers and others, who faithfully and diligently perform their ecclesiastical functions. Some persons, however, are not satisfied with it, those namely, who have thought fit rather to give up the ofiice of a preacher and minister than wear a surpUce in the administration of the holy sacraments, [1 Gcnn. Husshuch.] [2 Sec above. Letter XCVIIL p. 202.] 15 226 J. ABEL TO H. BULLINGER. [lET. or put on a clerical cap. So rigid are they in their opinion, that they have altogether given up their ecclesiastical vocation, and are therefore deposed from their ministry : which is greatly to be regretted ; especially as they need not put on a surpUce when preaching, as indeed nobody is commanded to do, except in the administration of infant baptism and of the Lord*'s supper. IMaster Thomas Sampson has written you a letter^ upon this subject, and desires to receive your answer ; because he is foremost in oppo- sition to this practice, and has given up liis preferment^: and several other preachers have joined him, who are resolved rather to resign their functions than wear the cap and surplice. Five preachers have lately been deprived, and sent as . prisoners, two of them to master Horn, bishop of Winchester, two to Dr Cox, bishop of Ely, and one to master Parkhurst, bishop of Norwich. These five preachers had been interdicted from preaching, but notwith- standing the prohibition, they again preached in their respective churches, in consequence of wliidi our queen and privy council are much displeased. They were summoned before the queen's council, and when they made their appearance, much was said to them for having preached contrary to the queen's orders, and for having aiforded a bad example to the common people, so as to render them disobedient. Whereupon the five preachers fell upon their knees, and asked for mercy : in reply to which the lords in council an- swered, that if the queen were not merciful and gracious, they would all have had to undergo severe punishment ; but, seeing that they were preachers of God's holy word, they should have eight days allowed them wherein to visit their friends and connections, after which they were to proceed, two to the bishop of Winchester, and two to the bishop of Ely, and one to the bishop of Norwich, as prisoners, as above mentioned, so long as the queen and her council shall think fit^. One of these preachers has also caused to be [1 See above, Letter CII. p. 211.] [2 Sampson was, by a special order from the queen, deprived by the archbishop and commissioners of the deanery of Christ-chm'ch. See Stiypc, Parker, i. 368. The archbishop subsequently wrote in his behalf to the queen and to tlie chapter. Sampson afterwards obtained the master- ship of the hospital of William de Wigston, at Leicester, and a prebend in St Paul's, and by leave and favour of the queen was appointed theological lecturer at Whittingtou College in London. See Wood, Athena;, Vol. i. p. 234.] [3 Archbishop Parker, in a letter to Haddon, says : " With the assistance of the queen's majesties council we have dispersed a few of the heads of them, some to the bishop of Winchester, some to Ely, and some to Norwich, cvr ] • J. ABEL TO H. EULLINGER. 227 printed a book* against the queen's command respecting the cap and surphce : but as soon as the authorities heard of it, the book was prohibited, the printers cast into prison, and the copies de- stroyed. Another book^ was afterwards pubhshed by order of the commissionqj-s, wherein is declared the judgment of master doctor Peter Martyr and master Bucer, viz. that every preacher and minister ecclesiastical may wear a surplice, cap, and the other habits, without committing any sin, as you and master Gualter have also written. The opposite party are much dissatisfied with this, and, as far as they dare, write secretly against it ; so that, unless our gracious God afford us his aid and support, it is to be feared that it will occasion much hinderance to the spread of the gospel. But our Lord God, I trust, is gracious and full of com- passion, and will help us to establish unity and peace, so that the cruel fiend may not occasion a schism. All things are going on pretty well in Scotland, and all the exiled nobles and lords have returned to their country, and are in possession of their lands and property. The gospel (praised be God !) is still preached, and I hope all will be quiet ; for the exiled lords are magistrates in that country. The queen of Scotland, I hear, is in the family way, and expects to be confined within a week*^. I have nothing else to write to you at present. Salute, I pray you, all my good masters and friends. The grace of God be with us all ! Amen. Yours ever, John Abel, England. to school them, or at least to have them out of London till we see cause to restore them theu* liberty." Strypo considers that " Gentleness, as appears hence, was used towards these ministers that stood out and so were deprived." After noticing their being thus sent to thi-ee of the bishops, he adds : " But it was not long that they remained so, but were restored to their liberties ; and had leave, or at least connivance to preach." Life of Parker, i. 445.] [4 This work was entitled, A brief discourse against the outward apparel and ministering garments of the popish church : but the running title was. The unjolding of the popish attire. A full account of the contents is given by Stiype, Ann. i. ii. p. 163.] [5 For an account of this book, supposed to have been published by the archbishop of Canterbm-y, seo Strype, Annals, i. ii. 174.] [c The queen of Scots was delivered of a son, afterwards king James L, on June Id, 1506.] 15 — 2 22S M. COVERDALE, &C. TO W. FAUELL. P. VIRET, &C. [lET. CVII. M. COVERDALE, &c. TO W. FARELL, P. VIRET, T. BEZA, &c. [B. 50.] London, Jult/ 1566. We must not only, honoured masters and bretkren, appear troublesome to your reverences by so frequently addressing you by our friends and our letters, but must seem also very regardless of our duty to the church, by disturbing you, who are occupied in matters of far greater importance, with the relation of our trifles. But yet the unhappy condition of oiu* times, and fresh troubles, compel us to have recourse to you, not only that you may be in- formed more fully of the state of our aifairs, and our own opinion respecting them, but that we also may more fully understand your sentiments. Our affairs are not altered for the better, but, alas ! are sadly deteriorated. For it is now settled and determined, that an unleavened cake must be used in place of common bread ; — that the communion must be received by the people on their bended knees ; — that out of doors must be worn the square cap, bands, a long gown and tippet ; while the white surplice and cope are to be retained in divine service. And those who refuse to comply with these requirements, are deprived of their estates, dignities, and every ecclesiastical office ; namely, brethren by brethren and bishops, whose houses are at this time the prisons of some preachers ; who are now raging against their own bowels ; who are now imposing these burdens not only on their own persons, but also on the shoulders of others ; and this too at a time when in the judgment of all learned men they ought to have been removed and abolished altogether. Thus you have the image and representation, such as it is, of our church. Now, then, hear our opinion upon this state of things. We think that it must be assumed in this question, that the Jewish, Turkish, Christian, and Popish religions have each their own pecu- liar sacraments and signs ; and that external profession ought to be the test and badge of any one's doctrine ; and that Ave are to seek our pattern not out of the cisterns and puddles of our enemies, but from the fountain of the scriptures and of the churches of God ; so as not to be connected by any similarity of rites with those from whose religion we are altogether abhorrent : which rule, we read, was diligently observed by our forefathers in respect to the sabbath and passovcr of the Jews, the fastings of the JManichecs, and the trine immersion of heretics. Nor indeed can we regard these things as altogether indifferent, when compulsion is made use of, and when evil.] M. COVERDALE, «fec. TO W. FARELL, P. VIRET, &C. 229 too they are branded with the mark of superstition : nor ought any- thing to be obtruded [on the church] by the authority of the sovereign, without its having been lawfully discussed in a christian synod : nor ought agreement in ceremonies everywhere to be required of necessity, especially when it is in common with the enemies of the faith : nor is there any occasion in the church of Christ either for the Aaronic priesthood, or Pharisaical ambition, that sacred garments should be worn now-a-days in the christian temple, or that a dress not common, but distinct and peculiar, should be prescribed for ordinary use. But we think with Celes- tine, that the clergy should be distmguished from the people by their doctrine, not their garments ; their conversation, not their dress ; their purity of mind, not their adornment of person ; lest we begin to hanker after novelties, tread under foot the order received from our forefathers, impose upon the minds and eyes of the simple, and make room for vain and unprofitable superstitions. Besides, as many of us as have cast out these things from the churches committed to our trust, cannot restore them without grievous offence and abominable impiety : and since a door would also be opened to other mysteries of iniquity, and the love of the godly be offended, and the pride and boldness of the wicked be encouraged, without even any pretence of edification ; and since it is not lawful, according to St Paul's rule respecting things indif- ferent, for every one to rest in his own persuasion, but that that should be regarded as lawful, which is not displeasing to certain men ; we considered it more for the good of the church to stand fast in our liberty with an accession of godly men on our side, than to depart from the opinion we have taken up and the custom we have received, to the scandal of many and the downfall of purer doctrine. This is our opinion, and also that of a most excellent personage. We now, most illustrious and very dear masters and brethren, request you by our most intimate communion in Christ, to point out the cynosure to us who are tossed about on the waves ; and either to shew us a bettor way if we are in error, or confirm us, when doubting, in our holy purpose. The question, we confess, is nice and diflicult, whether it is better to yield to circumstances, or to depart ; to admit the relics of the Amoritcs, or to desert our post. Either alternative is harsh, grievous, and productive of mischief both to ourselves and the church. Which is the better, do you with your wonted wisdom declare, because w^e are lingering in suspense as in the last extre- 2o0 M. COVERDALE, &C. TO W. FARELL, P. VIRET, &C. [lET. mity'. Wc also request of you and your brother ministers to put forth at the earhest opportunity some treatise on the nature of things indifferent, on ceremonies, on the sacerdotal habit ; by which both our church and those of Saxony may be instructed, and the zeal of our sovereigns inspirited to the demolition of all the distinc- tive marks of antichrist. We make it, lastly, our request, that you would admonish our bishops by letter not to persecute Joseph on account of a garment; nor to rend the church with such a schism for so slight a cause ; but that even in the dissimilarity of rites they may preserve the sweetest harmony of spirit and bro- therly love. For far be it from us to think of them otherwise than as becomes friends and brethren. The sum is this. We request these three things ; your reply to the questions here proposed by us, and some treatise to all the churches generally ; a letter to the bishops privately, and, if you please, to such of her majesty's councillors as you may be acquainted with; so that this whole controversy may issue in a christian recon- cihation, and not in a cruel separation. Communicate this letter to all your brethren, that we may hear what the Lord may speak out of the mouth of two or three witnesses. May the Lord Jesus preserve his church pure and inviolate even to the day of his just judgment! July, 1566. Your most devoted, Miles Coverdale, formerly bishop of Exeter. Laurence Humphrey. Thomas Sampson. CVIII. W. TURNERS jq ^ BULLINGER. [B. 51.] Jzili/ 23, 1566. Greeting. As there was a great variety of opinion among the Jews respecting Christ the Son of God, when he came to [1 Inter sacrum et saxum. Plaut. Capt. iil. 4. 84.] [2 William Turner, doctor of physic, and a zealous divine, who under king Edward VI. had been dean of Wells, but outed in the next reign, and became an exile. He was restored to his deanery by archbishop Parker in 1559. He was bm-ied in Crutched Friars' Church, London, where he hath a monument yet remaining. Strype, Parker, i. 93. The bishoi^ of Bath and Wells [Gilbert Berkley] thus complained of him to Cecil, in a Letter dated March 23, 1564. "I am much encombered with master Dr Turner, deane of OVIII.] W. TURNER TO H. BULLINGER. 231 sojourn with us here on earth ; so from the occasion of your reply ^ to our brethren, which our rulers, as we suppose, have published without your sanction, both in Latin and English, many opinions have lately risen up respecting you, his sworn and faithful disciple and minister, among those who in this country profess a purer religion ; and different persons entertain different sentiments respect- ing you. God grant that as you have not given our country- men any just occasion of suspecting evil of you, so all may under- stand your answer in the sense in which you wrote it ! Whatever others may think concerning you, I am fully persuaded of this, that if, as is natural to man, you have unwittingly fallen into any error, provided only you are told of it in a friendly and courteous manner, you will be ready to acknowledge it without reluctance, and willingly confess the occasion of it. But, in reliance on your accustomed and well-known candour, I will proceed briefly to relate the opinions of our people respecting you, to the end that you may be able more fully and successfully to defend yourself from the imputations that are brought agamst you. There are not wanting those who think that our Samaritans, limping on both feet, (for we have many more of this stamp than sincere professors of the gospel,) have suggested to you many things quite opposite to the truth, and have therefore influenced, or at least persuaded you, to hurl all your darts against our poor wretched preachers, conniving at the faults of our principal ministers and others, who, for the sake of an ass's appearance*, have thrown into prison so many learned and godly pastors, stripped of all their dignities, and have exposed the flock of Christ unarmed to wolves, papists, Lutherans, Sadducees and Herodians. Some persons also boldly affirm, that there are many things in your answer, which are not only in manifest contradiction to your own books hereto- fore published, but also to the writings of all evangeUcal pastors. There are found too some among us, who think much the same respecting you, the most learned man and best expositor of christian doctrine in all Europe, as the Saxon preachers thought of their Welles, for his undiscreto behaviour in the pulpitt ; where he medleth with all matters, and unsemclie sjieaketh of all estates, more then is standing with discretion." MS. Lansd. 8. 3.] [3 For this reply see above, Letter CIV. p. 214. See also Letter CXIIL] [* Ob asini prospectum. This seems to be a contemptuous allusion to the ministers' habits, to which Dr Turner was so averse, that in the year 1565, as dean of Wells, he enjoined a common adulterer to do his open penance in a priest's square cap.] 232 W. TURNER TO H. BULLINGER. [lET. master Philip ]\Ielanctlion ; who, when Charles V. was attempting to obtrude the Interimistic ' and Adiaphoristic impieties upon all the reformed churches in Germany, to the great jeopardy of chris- tian liberty and no small injury to the truth, as they themselves testify in their published writings, passed over to the Interimists and Adiaphorists ; and afterwards, laying aside all fear, returned to a better mind^ Those persons Avho think most favourably of you, defend you in this manner. They say that nothing was farther from your intention than that your answer should be publicly set forth in Latin and English ; and that it was sent to our brethren, as men of learning, not with any view of defining or dogmatising, but simply as a hterary exercise. But since it is beyond all doubt that many worthy persons are grievously oifended by reason of its pub- lication, I would recommend that, — both for the removal of offence, as well as for the assertion, and vindication from any suspicion of falsehood, of that truth which in so many of your printed works you have maintained with so much courage, piety and assiduity, — you should candidly and openly and fearlessly bear witness, in some pubhshed tract, whether you are of opinion that princes or ecclesiastical prelates, whom you call principal ministers, have authority to obtrude upon the pastors of churches against their will, under pain of deprivation and imprisonment, certain prescribed habits, and corresponding ceremonies, whether borrowed from the heathen, or transferred from the Levitical law, or invented or approved by the pope, and destined and employed for the further- [1 Charles V. caused a paper to be drawn up by Julius Pflug, bishop of Naumburgh, Michael Sidonius, and John Agricola, which should serve as a rule of faith and worship to both papists and protestants till the re-assem- bling of the council of Trent. This paper, because it had not the force of a permanent law, was called the Interim. Melancthon, partly from fear of the emperor, and partly from condescension to Maurice, elector of Saxony, decided that the whole of the Interim could by no means be admitted, but that it might be received so far as it concerned things indifferent, (in rebus adiaphorls.) This decision gave rise to the Adiaphoristic controversy among the Lutherans, which is here referred to. For among things indifferent Melancthon reckoned many which Luther deemed of great importance. See Mosheim. ed. Soames, in. 160, 350, and Schmidii Historia Interimistica, p. 70, &c.] [2 Calvin complained to Melancthon of his want of firmness ; but it after- wards appeared, from the testimony of Beza, that his letter was written under misinformation. Beza's words are: Philippo etiam officii admonito, quern nonnidli itt in eo moUiorem accusabant ; im.merito id quidem, ut accura- tius postea Calvinus cognovit. See Scott's Contin. of Milner, ni. 392.] CVIII.] W. TURNER TO H. BOLLINGER. 2S3 ance of idolatry, without offence to christian Hberty and manifest injury to the church. I have written these things to you with the greater boldness, that you may the better ascertain my feelings towards you, while I am anxious for the honour and integrity of your character, and for the freedom of your doctrine from any suspicion of error. July 23, 1566. FareweU, Yours, William Turner, A physician, dehghting in the study of sacred literature. CIX. L. HUMPHREY AND T. SAMPSON TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 71.] July, loGB. As your dihgence, most illustrious sir, is proved to us by your writing, so also your incredible love towards us, and especial affec- tion for our church, and most ardent desire for peace, are all evident from your very courteous letter^. We sent your reverence some questions, upon which the force, and as it were the hinge, of the whole controversy seemed to turn. To these your reverence has accurately replied ; but, if we may be permitted to say so, not entirely to our satisfaction. In the first place, your reverence replies, that such regulations respect- ing their habits may be prescribed to ministers, as that they may be distinguished both by colour and shape from those of the laity ; for that it is merely a civil ordinance, and the apostle required the bishop to be koct/uio^, orderly*. But since this question is brought forward concerning churchmen, and relates to ecclesiastical polity, we do not see how the peculiar and clerical habit of ministers can be regarded as a mere civil matter. We admit, indeed, that a bishop must be Koafxio^, but this we refer with Ambrose to the ornaments of the mind, and not the decoration of the person. And as we require in dress both decency, and dignity, and gravity, so we deny that our propriety is to be borrowed from the enemies of our religion. In the second place, you answer hypothetically, that if a cap, and a habit not unseemly and without superstition, be prescribed to the clergy, Judaism is not on this account brought back. But [3 See above. Letter CIV. p. 214.] [4 Sec 1 Tim. iii. 2, where the word is translated of (jood behaviour, or, in the marginal version, modest.] 234 L. HUMPHREY AND T. SAMPSON TO H. BULLINGER. [lET. how can that habit be thought consistent with the simple ministry of Christ, which used to set off tlie theatrical pomp of the popish priesthood ? For not only (as our people wish to persuade your reverence) are the square cap and gown required in public, but the sacred garments are used in divine service ; and the surplice, or white dress of the choir, and the cope are re-introduced. Which things not only do the papists declare in their books to be copies and imitations of Judaism, but your reverence has more than once taught the same from Innocent. We most willingly subscribe to the testimony of our most revered master, Doctor Martyr : but the instances which he produces, tend to decency and order ; these deform the church, disturb order, overturn all that is decent. The former [instances] are agreeable to the light of nature ; the latter are unnatural and monstrous. Those, according to Tertulhan's rule, had a shew of necessity and use : these are altogether frivo- lous, and superfluous, and useless ; and neither conducive to edifi- cation nor any good end whatever, but more truly, to use the language of the same Peter Martyr, they were splendid accompa- niments of that worship which all godly persons now abominate. The papists themselves are boasting that the distinction of ecclesi- astical habits now adopted was a popish invention ; the constitutions of Otho speak the same thing ; the Eoman pontifical shews it, and the eyes and lips of all prove it to be the case. The use of churches, stipends, baptism, the creed, &c. was established by divine command long before the pope was born. And, whatever we meet with in any heresy, that is of divine and legitimate authority, we do not deny that, with Augustine, we both approve and retain it. But because this matter is peculiarly one of error and disagreement, we resolutely argue and contend with it. As to your adding, that the use of the habits was not abolished at the beginning of the Reformation, your informants have again stated what is by no means the fact. For in the time of the most serene king Edward the Sixth, the Lord's supper was cele- brated in simplicity in many places without the surplice ; and the cope\ which was then abrogated by law, is now restored by a public ordinance. This is not to extirpate popery, but to replant it ; not to advance in religion, but to recede. You say that the [1 The use of this vestment, however, observes Mr Soaincs, must have been merely optional after the (jueen's injunctions were issued. It is a pity, therefore, he adds, that the excellent writers mentioned it, as they were thus plainly denying a liberty to others which they insisted upon for themselves. Soames' Elizabethan Religious History, p. 31.] CIX.] L. HUMPHREY AND T. SAMPSON TO H. BULLINGER. 235 priestly garment is a matter of civil concern, and deny that it savours of monachism, popery, or Judaism. What the papists babble about the surplice, of how great importance the clerical dress is esteemed among them, and to what religion it is dedicated, we doubt not but that your prudence is well acquainted with from their books. In the next place, this ambitious and Pharisaical prescribing of a peculiar dress savours of monlsiery and popery, and those of the present age ascribe no less virtue to it than the monks of old did to their cowls. Nor in truth has this opinion of hohness and merit burst forth all at once, but has crept on insen- sibly by little and little. We are therefore hesitating, not without reason, and are endeavouring to check at the outset, what we fear will come to pass in this country. We do not agree with Eusta- thius^, who placed religion in dress; so far from it, that we are at issue with those who superstitiously require peculiar and religious habits as badges of their priesthood. The like also may be said of the canon of the council of Gangra^ and Laodicea*, and of the sixth synod; and to depart from that liberty in which we have hitherto stood, we consider to be giving a kind of sanction to sla- very. But neither in this are we too scrupulous ; we make no vexatious opposition ; we always avoid any bitterness of contention; we are ready to enter into an amicable conference ; we do not voluntarily leave [our churches] to the wolves ; but constrained and driven from our places, we depart with unwillingness and regret. We leave our brethren and the bishops to stand or fall to their own master ; and we look most submissively, but in vain, for the like forbearance towards ourselves. In the rites nothing' is discretionary ; not that the queen's majesty has been excited to this by us, but she has been influenced by the persuasion of others ; so that at length that is established, not which is for the interest of the church, but merely what is not unlawful ; and what is not altogether impious, is accounted wholesome, and salutary, and holy, and is confirmed by law. As ceremonies and sacerdotal habits are signs of religion and marks of profession, they are not of a civil character ; and being [2 Eustathius was a Greek monk of the fourth century, whose eiTors were condemned at the council of Gangra. See next note.] [3 Hckl about a.d. 365 or 370. The canon here referred to is the t\yelfth, "against those who fancy themselves to be more holy than others, because they wear a singular habit, and who condemn those that wear decent ap- parel." Du Pin, Bibliothe'que, Tom. n. p. 340. Paris. 1693.] [4 Held A.D. 363. J 236 L. HUMPHREY AND T. SAMPSON TO H. BULLINGER. [lET. borrowed from our adversaries, as all allow them to be, they cannot be convenient ; and being marked with the divine anathema, and detested by all godly persons, and had in honom* by the wicked and the weak, who think that without tlicm we can neither be ministers, nor that the sacraments can be rightly administered, they neither can nor ought to be reckoned among things indifferent. The ancient fathers had their habits ; but they were neither pecu- liar to bishops, nor distinguished from those of the laity. The instances of St John^ and Cyprian- are peculiar. Sisinius was a heretic, and is neither to be held out for our commendation nor example. The pallium was a dress common to all Christians^, as Tertullian relates in his book*, and as your reverence has else- where remarked. Chrysostom makes mention of a white garment, but only incidentally ; he neither commends it nor tinds fault with it, and it is not yet ascertamed whether it was peculiar to the priests or to the Greeks in general ; hnen or woollen ; white or merely clean in ajjpearance. In the address to the people of Antioch it is certainly opposed both by him and Jerome to a sordid [garment,] and in Blondus there is mention of a palhum [cloak] of woollen ; so that in a matter of so much doubt nothing can be determined. That the prescribing of habits [to the clergy] is inconsistent with christian liberty, we have the testimony of Bucer. who was of opinion that the distinction of dress should be entirely done away with, as well on account of the present abuse of it in the English churches, as for a more decided declaration of our abhorrence of antichrist, a more full assertion of our christian liberty, and the removal of dissensions amongst brethren. These words he made use of in his letter to master a Lasco, who was altogether on our side. Whence it is evident, that great offence is occasioned, and edification impeded by it. We must indeed submit to the time, but onlj for a time ; so that we may always be making progress, and [1 Bullinger had quoted a passage from Eusebius, Hist. v. 24, speaking of St John as t6 TreVaXov TrecfiopTjKas, u'earing a plate [of gold.] Epiphaiiius relates the same of James, the brother of oiu' Lord. Hter. Lxxvni.] [2 Pontius, the deacon, as quoted in Bullinger's letter, says of him, that at his martyrdom, eocidt se lacernam, birriiui quern indatus crat, dehinc tunicani tulit, et stans in linea expectabat spicidatorem.] [3 This was the opinion of Scaliger ; Salmasius, on the contrary, main- tained that it was peculiar to the priests.] [•* DepaUio, \n-itten about a.d. 209. It is a kind of satirical defence of Tertullian's Iiaving laid aside the Roman toga or gown, and assumed the pallium or c'wiA-.] CIX.] L. HUMPHREY AND T. SAMPSON TO H. GULLINGER. 237 never retreatino-. Far be it from us either to sow schisms in the church by a vexatious contest, or by a hostile opposition to our brethren to do an injury to ourselves^ : far be it from us, most ex- cellent Bullinger, to charge with impiety things which are in their nature indifferent : far be it from us either to make our own feeUngs the pretence of abuse, or under the name of conscience to conceal a fondness for dispute. These dregs and this leaven of popery are, believe us, the source of the whole controversy : we desire it to be taken away and buried in eternal oblivion, that no traces of antichristian superstition may remain. The assumption of preeminence and pride has always displeased us in the papacy ; and can tyranny please us in a free church ? A free synod among Christians hath heretofore untied the knots of controversy ; why should every thing be now referred to the pleasure of one or two individuals ? Where the hberty of voting and speaking prevails, the truth is vigorous and flourishing. You will understand then, reverend father, in a few words, that these things are our principal object, — the authority of the scriptures, — the simplicity of the ministry of Christ, — the purity of the earUest and best churches, which, for the sake of brevity, we refrain from mentioning. But on the other side it has not hitherto been our lot either to hear or read of any law or general decree, either of Almighty God, or of any reformed church, or general council, (which is the rule of Augustine). We have disco- vered moreover, that the precedents hitherto adduced are particular ones, and do not confirm the general case. Besides, we are of opinion, not that whatever may be in any way lawful, should be obtruded, but what in every way tends to the edification of the church should be introduced ; and that which may be lawful to some, is not forthwith lawful to all. We have, (praised be God !) a doctrine pure and incorrupt : why should we go halting in regard to divine worship, which is not the least im- portant part of religion ? Why should we receive Christ rather maimed, than entire, and pure, and perfect ? Why should we look for precedents from our enemies, the papists, and not from you, oui* brethren of the reformation ? Wo have the same confession in our churches, the same rule of doctrine and faith ; why should there be so great a dissimilarity and discrepancy in rites and cere- [5 The original is, Camarmam movearmis, a proverbial expression, de- rived, according to Suidas, from a lake of that name in Sicily, which being drained contrary to the advice of the oracle occasioned a pestilence.] 238 L. HUMPHREY AND T. SAMPSON TO H. EULLINGER. [lET. monies ? The thing signified is the same ; why do the signs so differ as to be unhke yours, and to resemble those of the papists ? We have the same captain and leader, Christ ; why are the banners of the enemy set up in our churches ? which, if we were men of God, if we were endued with any zeal, we should long since have abominated and destroyed. We have always thought well of the bishops ; we have put a candid interpretation upon their display of grandeur : why cannot they endure us who formerly bore the same cross with them, and who now preach the same Christ, and bear that most delightful yoke together with themselves? Why do they cast us into prison ? Why do they persecute us on account of the habits ? Why do they spoil us of our property and means of subsistence ? Why do they publicly traduce us in their books ? Why do they in their published writings commend a bad cause to posterity? For they have translated into our language some papers of Bucer and of Peter Martyr, and they have now sent forth to the public your private letters to us without our knowledge and consent. So that in pleading their own cause, and vindicating their honour, they neither consult the interests of our church, nor their brethren, nor your dignity, nor the succeeding generation. But that your reverence may understand that the controversy is of no light or trifling character, but of great importance, and that we are not merely disputing about a cap or a surplice, we send you some straws and chips of the popish religion, from which with your wonted prudence you may imagine the rest, and with your wonted piety think upon a remedy as soon as possible. And we pray our Lord Jesus Christ to allay these tumults and disorders, to assert his glory, to send forth labourers into his vineyard, that a joyous and abundant harvest may ensue. And we implore you, that by your paternal advice, public writings, and private letters, you will exert yourself, and be active in effecting either the removal of these evils, or the toleration of those good men who are not yet convinced ; lest the Roman ceremonial should disunite those whom the firm bond of doctrine hath joined together. Give our salutations to Gualter, Simlcr, Lavater, Wolfius, our esteemed masters, with whom if you will confer, you will exceed- ingly gratify both ourselves and the church at large. May the Lord Jesus Christ bless his tabernacle and your Zurich ! — July, 15G6. We have written briefly and in haste, and not so much by way of reply, as of admonishing you that there is no end to what CIX.l L. HUMPHREY AND T. SAMPSON TO H. BULLINGER. 239 might be said upon this subject. Do you then not decide upon what may or can be done, but upon what ought to be done. Your reverence's most devoted, Laurence Humphrey, Thomas Sampson. Some blemishes which still attach to the church of England : 1. In the public prayers, although there is nothing impure, there is however a kind of popish superstition, which may not only be seen in the morning and evening service, but also in the Lord"'s supper. 2. To say nothing of the effeminate and over-refined strains of the music itself, the use of the organ in church is growing more common. 3. In the administration of baptism the minister addresses the infant ; in whose name the sponsors, in the absence of the parent, make answer concerning faith, and renouncing the world, the flesh, and the devil. The person baptized is signed with the [sign of the] cross. 4. Licence is also given to women to baptize in private houses. 5. The sacred habits, namely the cope and surplice, are used at the Lord's supper ; kneeling is enjoined to those who commu- nicate, and an mileavened cake is substituted for common bread. 6. The popish habits are ordered to be worn out of church, and by ministers in general ; and the bishops wear their linen gar- ment, which they caU a rochet ; while both parties wear the square cap, tippets, and long gowns, borrowed from the papists. 7. But what shall we say respecting discipline, the sinews of religion ? There is none at all, neither has our church its rod, or any exercise of superintendence. 8. The marria2;e of the clergv is not allowed and sanctioned by the pubhc laws of the kingdom, but their children are by some persons regarded as illegitimate. 9. Solemn betrothing takes place after the popish method and rites, by the [giving of a] ring. 10. AVomen continue to wear a veil when they come to be churched. 11. In the ecclesiastical regimen there are retained many traces of the church of antichrist. For as formerly at Rome every thing might be had for money in the court of the pope, so almost all things are saleable in the court of the metropoUtan* ; [1 For a list of dispensations and their prices, see Strype, Grindal, p. 542.] 240 L. HUMPHREY AND T. SAMPSON TO H. BULLINGER. [lET. pluralities of benefices, licences of non-residence, for not entering into orders, for eating meat on days forbidden, and in Lent, at which time also it is forbidden to celebrate marriages without a dispensation and a fee. 12. The free liberty of preaching is taken away from the ministers of Christ : those who are now willing to preach are for- bidden to recommend any innovation with regard to rites ; but all are obliged to give their assent to ceremonies by subscribing their hands. 13. Lastly, the article composed in the time of Edward the Sixth respecting the spiritual eating, which expressly oppugned and took away the real presence in the Eucharist', and contained a most clear explanation of the truth, is now set forth among us mutilated and imperfect. ex. BISHOP PARKHURST TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 72.] LuDHAM, Aiiff. 21, 1566. May you be safe in Christ, my excellent Bulllngcr ! I wrote to you on the 2nd of February, and sent Avith my letter twenty crowns, or else ten crowns and cloth for a gown ; for I left it to Abel's discretion. I received your letter on the 23rd of May. Shortly after the bishop of London sent me a copy of your reply to the letter of Laurence Humphrey and Thomas Sampson. It is printed here both in Latin and EngHsh. I received likewise, on the 12th of July, a most excellent Httle book, The confession of the orthodox faith. In the month of March ^ an Italian, called Signer David [1 The 28tli of the thirty-nine Articles, which contained in the time of Edward VI. the following paragraph : " Forasmuch as the truth of man's nature requiroth, that the body of one and the self-same man cannot be at one time in divers places, but must needs be in one certain place; therefore the body of Chi-ist cannot be present at one time in many and divers places. And because, as holy scripture doth teach, Chi-ist was taken up into heaven, and there shall continue unto the end of the world, a faithful man ought not cither to believe or openly confess the real and bodily presence, as they term it, of Christ's flesh and blood in the sacrament of the Lord's supper."] [2 Viz. on March 9, 1566. The following circumstantial account of Riz- zio's murder is given in a letter from the carl of Bedford and Randolph to the Council of England, dated Berwickc, March 27, r Lnghshmen. J OHN J5ARTHELOT, J =" CXXIII. BISHOP GRINDAL TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 7G.] London, Feb. 8, 1567. Health in Christ, most renowned Bullinger, and very dear brother in Christ. I thank you that, in addition to your general 284 BISHOP GRIND A L TO H. BULLINGER. [lET, letter, you have written separately to myself. But there Is no reason why you should so studiously thank me, for having so fre- quently, and with so much satisfaction, made honourable mention of you. For I do this on account of your merit, as well knowing how much you have benefited the church, as you still continue to do, both by your ministry and your writings. Besides, I owe this to you as an individual, that by the perusal of your Treatise on the " Origin of Error'," about twenty years since, I was first led to entertain a correct opinion respecting the Lord's supper ; whereas before that time I had adopted the sentiments of Lu- ther on that subject. It is but just therefore that 1 should respect him from whom I have received so much benefit. I have thus briefly replied to your letter, which was most ac- ceptable to me. The churches in Scotland are in a somewhat better condition than when I last wrote to you ; but the queen herself remains unchanged. Her eldest- son was baptized in December last, after the popish manner, by some mitred pseudo- bishop ; but two^ only could be found out of the whole nobihty of that kingdom, who thought proper to be present at the christening. The rest only accompanied the infant, both in going and returning, [1 Zanchius, in a letter to BuUinger, mentions with high commendation his book De Origine Erroris, and relates an anecdote of Montallinus, a monk, who was burnt at Rome for the cause of the truth, that the said good man, before Zanchius had seen the tract, persuaded him earnestly to peruse it ; adding, that if it could not be had upon other terms, he might esteem it a good bargain, to pluck out his right eye for the purchase, and read it with his left. I soon bought the book, says Zanchius, without losing my eyes, and found it the dehght of my soul. Zanchii Epist. Tom. ii. p. 26. Hanor. 1609.] [2 The ceremony was performed at Stirling on the 17th of December, 1566. Queen Elizabeth, being requested to be godmother, sent the earl of Bedford with a font of gold for a present. The prince was held up at the font by the Countess of Argyll, in the name and by the special appointment of the Queen of England. She was afterwards summoned for this before the general assembly of the reformed church, and professing her sorrow, was appointed to do penance for what was considered an offence to the religious profession. After the baptismal rites were perfonned, the name and titles of the prince were three times proclaimed by the heralds to the sound of trumpets. He was called and designed, Charles James, James Charles, prince and steward of Scotland, Duke of Rothesay, Earl of Carrich, Lord of the Isles, and Baron of Renfrew.] [3 Bedford, . the English ambassador, and all the Scottish protestant nobilty stood outside of the door while the ceremony was performed. Bed- ford afterwards obsen'ed to Elizabeth, that of twelve earls present only two had countenanced the rites. See Spottiswood, and Melville's Memoirs.] cxxiii.] msnop grindal to h. bullixger. 2S5 as far as the door of the chapel. You are, I suppose, not igno- rant of what is going on in Brabant and Flanders. They will not, I hope, be without the divine assistance, since they appear to be in a great measure destitute of all human aid ; and especially if, as I fear, the king of Spain should come with an army to overwhelm them. Greet, I pray you, master Gualter, and your other col- leagues, in my name. May the Lord preserve you ! London, Feb. 8, 1567. Your most devoted in the Lord, Edmund Grindal, bishop of London. CXXIV. BISHOP JEWEL TO H. BOLLINGER. [A. 77.] Salisbury, Feb. 24, 1567. Much health in Christ. As my last letter, most accomphshed sir, arrived in London rather too late, so that it could not be for- warded in time for the fair at Frankfort, it returned to me without the accomplishment of its object; and I am rather afraid of the same thing happening to the one now before me. For your late long and very learned letter to me I return you many thanks, and most gladly acknowledge myself to be com- pletely satisfied respecting that synod at Frankfort, as a matter of doubt and controversy. Our ecclesiastical affairs, pubhc and private, are in the same state as heretofore. Our Louvaine friends are making as much noise and disturbance as they can ; and they have some auxiliaries, who, though not very numerous, are yet much more so than I could wish. And though they arc many, and write against every one in general, yet I know not by what fatahty they are all carried out against me alone ; so that while I am replying to them, you must not think me idle. We have assembled within those few months the parhamcnt* of the whole kingdom, at which, however, owing to ill health, I have been unable to be present. Laws have been enacted con- cerning religion^, by which the obstinate malice and insolence of the papists are kept within due bounds. The question respectino- the succession was likewise brought forward ; that is, to what family belongs the right of sovereignty, in case any thing, which we should much regret, should happen to queen Ehzabcth. This [4 The first day of the sitting of this parliament was Wednesday, Oct. 2.] [5 The chief of these was a bill for confirming the consecration of arch- bishops and bishops. Strypc, Annals, i. ii. 229.] 2S6 BISHOP JEWKT, TO H. BULLINGER. [lET.' question occupied the minds of all parties for a month or two^ ; for the queen was unwilling that any discussion should take place upon the subject, while every one else was exceedingly anxious about it ; and the contest was carried on with great earnestness and ability on both sides. What next ? after' all nothing could be done ; for the queen", who is a wise and cautious woman, suspects, that when her successor is once determined upon, there may hence arise some danger to herself^. For you know the saying, that there are more worshippers of the rising than of the setting sun. As to religion, the affair of the habits has at this time occa- sioned much disturbance. For it is quite certain that the queen will not be turned from her opinion ; and some of our brethren are contending about this matter, as if the Avhole of our religion were contained in this single point ; so that they choose rather to lay down their functions, and leave their churches empty, than to depart one tittle from their own views of the subject. They will neither be persuaded by the very learned writings either of your- self and Gualter, or by the counsels of other pious men. However, we thank God that he does not suffer us at this time to be dis- quieted among ourselves by questions of more importance. One alone of our number, the bishop of Gloucester*, hath openly and boldly declared in parliament his approval of Luther's opinion re- [1 Namely, from Oct. 18 to Nov. 25. For a particular account of thl^ discussion, see Strype, Annals, i. ii. 232, &c.] [2 The question respecting a successor had been moved in the session of 15G2, when Sir John Mason, in a letter to Sir Thomas Chaloner, thus ex- pressed his opinion of the queen's prudent conduct : " Bothe om- howses have byn earnestly in hand with the queene to ajipointe her successor, but she wyll not byte at that bayte; wherein in myne opinion she ha the a better judgment than manye have of them that be so earnest in the matter." MS. Cotton. Galba. c. i. 87. This, and other letters referred to in several of these notes^ may be found in Wright's Queen Elizabeth and her Times, London, 1838.] [3 Nov. 6th. Rogers and Cecil read in writing notes of the queen's say- ings before the lords and committees of the commons ; importing that her grace had signified to both houses, by the word of a prince, that she, by God's grace, would marry, and would have it therefore believed. And touching limitation for succession, the perils were so great to her jierson, and whereof she had felt part in her sister's time, that the time would not yet suffer to treat of it. Strype, Annals, i. ii. 235.] [4 Richard Cheney, conseci-atcd bishop of (Gloucester, Apr. 19, 1562. He had also the bishoprick of Bristol iti commendam. A character of him is given by Strype, Annals, i. i. 418, who confirms the statement in the text, by saying, " We may conclude him not a pai)ist, but a Lutheran rather, in his opinion of the eucharist." Annals, I. ii. 285.] CXXIV.] BISHOP JEWEL TO 11. BULLINGER. 287 specting the eucharist ; but this crop will not, I hope, be of long continuance. There is some little disturbance now in Ireland. One John 0'JS^eale^ a bastard, has lately been levying troops, and insolently defymg our soldiery. But this is a matter of more tediousness than danger; for he conceals himself afar oif in the bogs and wastes, where our forces cannot easily overtake him. From Scotland, however, (what shall I tell you, or what will you believe ?) horrible and atrocious reports are announced. And though they are of such a nature as that I can hardly believe them possible, yet they are written to me from court, and are every where noised about, and believed by all. The young king, they say, has within the last few days'', together with an attendant whom he has had from his cradle, been murdered in his house, and carried out of doors, and left in the open air. Beheve me, my mind shudders to relate such things, whether they are true or not ; yet if they should be true, I will hereafter give you entire infor- mation as to the motives, or to what treachery he has fallen a victim, as soon as I shall have become acquainted with all the circumstances of the case. At present, I can neither be wholly silent upon a subject which is so universally spoken of, nor can I affirm too confidently what I do not yet know to be the fact. I hear that my friend Julius is dead at Zurich. I send him, however, twenty French crowns, for his own use, if he is still living ; but if, which I hope is not the case, he is dead, let them be expended upon a scholastic entertainment. Had I leisure, I would write to masters Lavater, Simler, Wolfius, Haller, and others ; [5 Shane, or John, O'Neale, the son of Con O'Neale, who had been created Earl of Tyrone, usm-ped the sovereignty of his clan in opposition to the will of his father, who had appointed his illegitimate son Matthew for his suc- cessor. Shane had rebelled in queen Mary's days, and again in 1561, when he was induced, by the persuasions of the Earl of Kildare, to make his sub- mission to queen EUzabeth, and accoixlingly went to London for that purpose in Jan. 1562. See a letter from Cecil to the Earl of Sussex. MS. Cotton. Titus, b. xin. 69. He rebelled a third time in 1566, and was reduced by the Lord President to such extremity, that he was on the point of submitting, but was persuaded, by one of his attendants, to make a last attempt upon the Scots. They pretended to embrace his advances, and at a feast treacherously murdered both him and his companions, and sent his head to Dublin. For an account of his last rebellion see the Sidney Papers, Vol. i. p. 15, and a letter from the Archbishop of Armagh [Loftus] to the Earl of Sussex. MS. Cott. Titus, b. xm. 159.] [c Namely, on Feb. 10th. For a detail of the circumstances attending this murder, see Lett. CXXVL and Camden's Elizabeth, p. 88.] 288 BISllOr JEWEL TO H. BOLLINGER. [lET- and especially to Gualter, to whom, ungrateful that I am, I have never yet written. Salute all of them, I j^ray you, affectionately in my name, and especially your [sons] Rodolph and Henry. Farewell, my father, and most esteemed master in Christ. Salisbury in England, Feb. 24, 1567. Yours in Christ, John Jewel, Anglus. CXXV. p. WIBURNi TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 78.] LoNDOK, Feb. 25, 1567. Health. When I was with you, reverend sir, at Zurich last summer, your having so kindly received me, an obscure individual, and uncommended to you by any j)ublic testimony, as to entertain me at your table, was a singular proof of your courtesy and hospi- tality ; for which I acknowledge myself most deeply indebted to you. But that I was prevented by your illness from conversing Avith you as freely and fully as I wished respecting our affairs, and the state and condition of the church in this country, tliis indeed was very mortifying to me during my stay in your city, inasmuch as through this circumstance I was deprived of the greatest advan- tage of my visit : afterwards, however, I perceived that this turned out most happily, and not without the direction and providence of God. You remember, excellent sir, if I am not mistaken, that on the day on which you sent for me, by your son, from my lodgings, and desired me to declare the object of my visit, master Gualter being also present, I did not complain at any length concerning the calamity and distress of this our church ; partly because you con- sidered yourself as possessing clearly a more than sufficient acquaint- ance with our affairs ; and partly too because you had been so well informed of all these things by the letters of some of our brethren, and especially of master Beza, that there was no occasion to add any thing to that intelligence. Having therefore placed in your hands two schedules, of which mention was made in master Bcza's letter to you, I was dismissed by you to my lodgings, so that in the mean time I did not utter a single word upon any given point of religion. And afterwards too, during the two days in which I was waiting for your letter, it is quite evident that 1 had no con- \} Perceval Wiburn was of St John's Collea;e, Cambridge, and an exile for religion in Queen Mary's time. He was afterwards prebendary of Winchester and Rodicstei-, but dei)rivcd for non-conformity.] CXXV.] p. WIBURN TO H. BULLINGEB. 289 versation either with yourself or others, excepting only that I pro- posed some questions respecting habits and ceremonies in general to one or two of your congregation. But lo ! most learned father, on ray return home to my friends, I am charged with detraction and calumny, as if I had gone to you expressly to defame and detract from others, which would have been very unbecoming, or as if I had purposely studied to give a false and feigned report respecting our church. And upon anxiously inquiring the cause and origin of this charge, I find all the mischief to have arisen from your letter to the bishops, which, as I received it sealed, and evidently ignorant of its contents, I had some time before taken care should be delivered into their hands. Why should I prolong my statement ? Being fully conscious of my innocence in this matter, I forthwith waited upon the bishop of Winchester, who was then in London, and conversed with him seriously, (as it was right I should do,) upon this business : at length a letter was produced in your handwriting, stating that reports had reached you respect- ing a strange language, clay, spittle, candles, and I know not what else, here made use of in the public service ; for I was only per- mitted at that time to look over one or two sentences. They will have it that I am the author of this report. But, though this is so very trifling in the relation, and the very supposition falls to the ground by its own absurdity ; yet since it has acquired so much strength, either by the instigation of the devil liimself, or by the hatred and malice of some individuals, and the too great credulity of others, that I am meanwhile labouring under a heavy suspicion with those persons whom I have now for some years embraced as friends and brethren in Christ, and with whom also I desire to live henceforth upon friendly terms, as far as lies in my power ; I am therefore compelled to have recourse at this time to your friend- ship, that, known as you are for piety and integrity, you may by your testimony vindicate my innocence from being thus slandered. You cannot easily forget, reverend sir, what were the heads I com- plained of in the articles ; so that there was not the slightest occa- sion to scrape together the strange language, clay, spittle, candles, and other superfluities, to increase this mischief. I would that this church were as free from other burdens and blemishes, as by the grace of God she is free from these evils : the complaint of the godly would not certainly in that case be so well founded, as it now is, alas ! too much so. You will take in good part my freedom in making this request, when you consider, first, that my own testimony respecting mvself 19 290 p. WIBURN TO H. BULLINGEK. [lET. in this matter, however simple and true, cannot easily be con- firmed ; and next, that the aifair has come to that pass, by the rashness and inconsidcrateness of some parties, that it is made known to some of the highest authorities in tliis kingdom ; lastly, that the cause of the ministers, otherwise good and holy, has under this pretext come into bad odour with many persons, whence it happens, that abuses are now sticking closer and retained more pertinaciously, and all hope of reformation is almost entirely aban- doned. For, (besides that the ancient superstitions and reUcs of popery are too agreeable to many parties, and there are also found among ourselves patrons of those things, who distort the writings of learned men, and your own especially into that direction,) if the rest of the ministers should once bo convicted of circulating false reports, it is easy to conjecture how little their diligence and exer- tions will avail them in future even in the best of causes ; so that not only my own danger as an individual, but the common cause, which is certainly not that of man, but of Jesus Christ, especially demands your aid and support. I do not therefore entertain any doubt but that you will promptly and with alacrity put forth your hand in so honourable and necessary a cause. For my own part, I by no means desire you to glance at or censure others, (though this indeed might be done according to the general practice, yet unless it were done in general terms, and with much discretion, it would not be very safe for myself;) but I only ask this, that you will defend and vindicate me, now in danger, upon just grounds ; and this, if it please you, in a private letter to myself, lest greater disquiet should arise, in case it should be known to some parties: but if they will be at peace, I wish for nothing else ; but if not, I desire only to have sometliing which it is in your power to grant, and which may serve them for an answer. And though this, whatever it be, might, and perhaps should, have been sought for by me at an earlier period, yet I have hitherto abstained from writing that I might spare you, who are both old and infirm, and already more than enough troubled by this matter. Arid I wish that I could still and altogether spare you any trouble ; but when the first counsellor of this kingdom has lately sent for me in a private and friendly way to advise mo about this business, and recommended me to obtain two or three words from you, to be ready if necessary, I have at last, most excellent sir, as you see, thrown myself with confidence upon your justice, in which I earnestly implore and entreat you not to reject me, and thereby at Ihe same time provoke those persons yet more against me, whom I CXXV.] p. WIBURN TO H. BULLINGEB. 291 find sufficiently harsh and hostile already. And if you will be kind enough to send to Geneva what you may think proper to write, either to master Beza, or master Raymond, by whom it may be afterwards forwarded to the minister of the French church in London, (a thing they do very frequently,) your letter will by this means safely reach me, if it is directed to me by name. You may readily infer, my father, from this, that I do not so ardently and seriously request an answer from you, as I expect it with anxiety and solicitude. I shall, in the mean time, comfort and support myself as well as I can, by the testimony of my con- science. May the Lord Jesus long preserve you in safety to his church, and daily visit you with his increasing power ! Salute, I pray you, from me, that most excellent servant of Jesus Christ, master Rodolph Gualter and his wife, whom if you will thank for my sake, or rather in my name, you will gratify me exceedingly. Salute also, I pray you, your other fellow-ministers with whom I am acquainted, masters Simler, Wolfius, both your sons, and especially the younger, to whom I am greatly indebted for the kindness which he shewed me at Zurich. Farewell, most reverend father in Clu-ist, and remember, I pray you, this tottering church in your prayers to God. Again farewell. London, Feb. 25, 1567. Your reverence's most devoted, Perceval Wiburn. CXXVI. BISHOP GRINDAL TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 79.] London, June 21, 1567. Health in Christ, master Bullinger, and very dear brother in the Lord. I heartily thank you for having received my letter with such acceptance, and hkewise for your Homilies on Isaiah, which I received through master John Abel. The bishop of Win- chester and myself rephed at the last Frankfort fair to your letter of September, sent by Wiburn, but dehvered to us by some one else ; and I hope you have long since received our answer. With respect to the pubhcation of your letter on the vcstiarian controversy, I knew indeed that you did not write it with that view ; but as I foresaw for certain that great advantage would arise to our churches from its publication, I persuaded myself that you Avould take it in good part. Our aftairs arc pretty much in the same state as heretofore. 19—2 292 BISHOP GRINDAL TO H. BULLINGER. [lET. We have now with us count Stolberg', a German ambassador from the emperor Maximihan. He demands, as I hear, an annual sub- sidy of money for the war with the Turks. But he does not seem likely to get any thing here, unless other kingdoms and states will unite in making a common contribution. There is also some talk respecting a marriage between our queen and Charles of Austria^ ; but rehgion is duly provided for throughout the whole business ; so that unless Charles chooses to renounce popery, he has nothing to hope for in this quarter. Henry, who was lately king of Scot- land, as I suppose you know, was found^ dead on the tenth of last February, in a garden adjacent to a seat he had at some distance from the court. Persons are not yet agreed as to the manner of his death. Some say that the house was blown up by means of some barrels of gunpowder placed on purpose under the chamber in which he slept, and that he was carried by the explosion into the adjoining garden*. Others however affirm, that he was violently dragged from his chamber in the dead of night, and afterwards strangled, and that the house was last of all blown up with gun- powder. A certain lord named Bothwell is universally suspected of this murder. The queen of Scotland^ married him on the fifteenth of May, after he had divorced his lawful wife^ by the authority of the archbishop of St Andrews, and raised him to be duke of Orkney. A short time before this marriage almost all the nobles of the kingdom", perceiving that no inquiry was made concerning the murder of the king, retired from the court, and held a separate assembly at the town of StirUng. In this assembly it was discovered [1 Count Stolberg was sent over to treat for a marriage between the arch- duke Charles and the queen of England.] [2 For the conditions oiFered see Strype, Annals, i. ii. 240. After various proposals, the article of religion was found to be an insurmountable difficulty, and the match was broken off.] [3 See p. 287.] [4 This supposition is contradicted, according to Hume's account, by the confession of the criminals.] P The ceremony was performed in a private manner, after the rules of the popish church; but to gratify the people, it was likewise solemnized publicly, according to the Protestant rites, by Adam Bothwell, bishop of Orkney, an ecclesiastic, who was aftei-wards, Hume states, deposed by the church for this scandalous compliance.] [" Sister to the earl of Huntley, to whom he had been married two years before.] ['' The leaders of this confederacy were the earls of Argylo, Athol, Morton, Mar, and Glencairn ; the lords Hume, Sempil, and Lindsay; the bai-ons Kirk- aldy of Grange, Murray of TuUibardin, and Maitland of Lethington.] CXXVl.] BISHOP GRINDAL TO H. BULLINGER. 293 by indisputable evidence, that this abominable murder had been perpetrated by Bothwell. Wherefore they collect troops, and endea- vour to seize upon him ; he betakes himself to flight, but whither he is gone, as yet no one knows. Some say that the queen ^ is besieged in a certain fortress ; but others assert that she is detained prisoner in Edinburgh Castle, as being privy to the murder of her husband. Whatever be the fact, it is impossible but that this infa- mous marriage must end in some dreadful tragedy. But we are in daily expectation of more certain intelligence of all these things, of which I will shortly take care to let you know. I write nothing concerning the persecutions in Flanders, be- cause I think you are not ignorant of them. There are many rumours here about Geneva being besieged, but I hope they are not true. May the Lord Jesus preserve your piety in safety to us and to the church ! Your most devoted in the Lord, Edmund Grindal, Bishop of London. CXXVII. T. BEZA TO H. BULLINGER. [B. 60.] Geneva, June 29, 1567. [Extract.] But what good can be expected in England, while things re- main as they are ? I thought the difiiculty was only about the [8 " On June 4th, 1567, Morton, Mar, Hume, and Lindsay, with other in- ferior barons, and attended by 900 or 1000 horse, on a sudden surrounded the castle of Borthvvick, where Bothwell was in company with the queen. Bothwell had such early intelligence of their enterprise, that he had time to ride off with a few attendants ; and the insurgent nobles, when they became aware of his escape, rode to Dalkeith, and from thence to Edinburgh, where they had friends who declared for them in spite of the efforts of Mary's par- tisans. The latter, finding themselves the Aveaker party, retreated to the castle of Edinburgh, while the provost and armed citizens, to whom the de- fence of the town Avas committed, did not indeed open their gates to the insurgent lords, but saw them forced without offering opposition. These sad tidings were carried to Mary by Beaton, archbishop of Glasgow, who gives the above statement in a letter to his brother, dated June 17th. He found the queen still at Borthwick, ' so quiet, that there were not with her passing six or seven persons.' She had probably calculated on the citizens of Edin- bm-gh defending the capital against the insurgents ; but when this hope failed, she resolved on flight. Her majesty, says the letter, in men's clothes, booted and spurred, departed that same night from Borthwick to Dunbar ; whereof no man knew save my lord duke [Bothwell] and some of his seiTants, who met her about a mile from Borthwick, and conveyed her to Dunbar." Mackic's Castles of Mary queen of Scots, p. 162.] 294 T. BEZA TO H. BULLINGER. [lET. matter of the habits ; that some blemishes were left behind, which the bishops were perhaps too tardy in removing, or, as is every where wont to be the case in practice, they were unable to ob- tain what they most desire. But if the case is as I hear it to be, (and indeed these things can scarcely be invented,) where did such a Babylon ever exist? But although God alone can provide a remedy for these otherwise incurable evils, yet when these bre- thren ' had determined of themselves to go to you, I was unwilling to deter them from this their purpose. For though they will not bring you any agreeable tidings, yet I hope you will not regret the having been made better acquainted with those matters than you had ever been before ; and they also, bringing back from you both advice and consolation, will be relieved in some measure at least from the burden of their misery and grief. I therefore request you, my father, and not you only, but also the rest of the ministers and my much honoured masters, that you will freely listen to them, notwithstanding their statement is most distressing ; and that you will compassionate them as standing in need of counsel and consola- tion, which indeed I doubt not but that you will do with your singular brotherly love. As to myself indeed, I have adopted this plan, that, suspending my judgment even in matters, as it seems to me, most evident, respecting absent brethren, (over whom too I am not appointed a judge,) I would exhort them to meekness, and rather to alleviate these evils by patience than by any queru- lous accusations ; in which respect I think that I have found them endued with a spirit of gentleness. And when your authority, which they value most highly as they ought to do, shall be exerted in addition, they will return with a mind yet more tranquillised, and the Lord will doubtless at length provide a remedy. Geneva, July 29, 1567. Yours, Beza. CXXVIII. BISHOP PARKHURST TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 80.] LuDHASi, July 31, 15G7. I RECEIVED a letter from you on the 17th of October, and also on the 16th of May ; for both of which, and for your very learned discourses on Isaiah, I return you my warmest thanks. [1 These were Perceval Wiburn, and probably George Withers. See above, p. 2G2, and Strype, Parker, ii. 110.] CXXVIir.] BISHOP PARKHURST TO H. BULLINGER. 295 Nicolas CarviP died last summer, and at the beginning of this month Robert Beaumont, master of Trinity College in the Uni- versity of Cambridge. They have 'gone before us : we shall follow them when the Lord shall think fit. John O'Neale^, a chieftam and possessed of great authority among the wild and uncivihzed Irish, has, notwishstanding his oath, excited a rebellion against our queen. During this whole year he has been in arms, and was lately killed in an affray. There is now some hope that this rude and savage people, living only upon plun- der, will become more humane and civihzed. After the murder of Henry [Darnley,] king of Scotland, the queen married the earl of Bothwell, who has lately been created duke of Orkney. His wife is yet livmg, and is, as I am told, a most noble and excellent lady. The nobility* have humbled the queen ; but they notwithstanding treat her with great kindness, remembering, as it is right they should, the allegiance due to her. The duke^ has fled, I know not whither, detested by almost every [2 Nicolas Carvil had been one of the exiles at Zui'ich in queen Mary's time, as had also Rob. Beaumont. Strype, Memorials, in. i. 233.] [3 See note 5, p. 287. Cecil Avrites, in a letter to the earl of Sussex, dated Jan. 7, 1561. "On Saturday he (O'Neale) cam to the lord keeper's house, where wer with the lord keeper, the lord marquis of Northampton, the earle of Pembrook, the vice-chamberlayn, and poore I. There he humbly requyi-ed that we wold be meanes for hym to come to her majesty's presence to acknowledg his obedience. After some sharp rehersall to hym of his generall faults, we promised him om* meanes. We wold not suffer him to reply for his defence, meaning to leave that untill your lordshipp come. So I thought mete that his submission shuld be both in Irish and English, which he made uppon his knees, and first prostrat upon his face." MS. Cotton. Titus, b; xiii. 69.] [■1 After a conference with Kirkaldy of Grange, the queen put herself, upon some general promises, in the hands of the confederates, and was con- ducted to Edinburgh amidst the insults of the populace. Hume.] [5 His end is thus told by Sir James Melvil : " Now the laird of Grange, his two ships being in readinesse, he made sail towards Orkney, and no man was so frank to accompany him as the laird of Tullibardin, and Adam Both- well, bishop of Orkney. But the earl [Bothwell] was fled from Orkney to Sheatland, whither also they followed him, and came in sight of Bothwell's ship ; which moved the laird of Grange to cause the skippers to hoise up all the sails, which they were loath to do, because they knew the shallow water thereabout. But Grange, fearing to miss liim, compelled the marx-iners, so that for too great haste the ship wlierein Grange was did break upon a bed of sand, without loss of a man ; but Bothwell had leisure in the mean time to save himself in a little boat, leaving his ship behind him, which Grange took, and therein the laird of Tallow, John Hepburn of Bantoun, Dalgleesh, 296 BISHOP PARKHURST TO H. BULLINGER. [lET. one on account of this cruel murder of his sovereign. With whose concurrence he did this, I will not say ; but fame circulates some wonderful and horrible rumours : "Fama, malum quo non aliud velocius ullum, Tarn ficti pravique tenax quam nuntia veri." The nobles of Scotland have at their command some regiments, and in all their colours or standards they bear this painted representation. There is depicted a green and beautiful tree, under which is lying a tall man, naked, and strangled with a rope : near him is a young man, also naked, and pierced with many wounds : next is painted a little boy with a crown of gold upon his head, with bended knees and uplifted hands, and these words written as proceeding from his mouth, " Lord, have mercy on me, and avenge my father's blood." Hereby are represented the king, his attendant, and his son. I cannot write more. Business presses. The courier is in haste. Eodolph Gualter will tell you every thing else. I would have written to Wolfius, Lavater, Simler, Wonlychius, Froschover, and Julius ; but I can not : I wish I could. They must take it in good part. I will write to them at another time. Farewell. Salute all my friends. In haste. Ludham, July 31, 1567. Yours, John Parkhurst, [Bishop] of Norwich. CXXIX. H. BULLINGER AND R. GUALTER TO T. BEZA. [B. Gl.] Zurich, Aug. 3, 15G7. We entertained, very dear brother, the Englishmen you com- mended to us, with the greatest courtesy in our power. They laid before us some writings, which indeed we had seen before, requesting our advice and assistance, as that of persons possessing much influence with the English bishops. We replied that we had long since done every thing in our power, and were unable to do more ; besides, that the bishops had made such answer for them- selves, as to make it appear that they were not the aggrieved party. We therefore read them our letter' to the bishops upon this busi- ness, Avith the bishops' letter to us in reply. But they alleged that it was not fairly stated by the bishops, for that the case was widely and divers others of the earl's servants. Himself fled to Denmark, where he ■was taken, and kept in strait prison, -wherein he became mad and dyed miser- ably." Wright's Life and Times of Queen Elizabeth, Vol. i. p. 257.] \} See above, Letters CXIII, and CXXI, pp. 253, 273.] CXXIX.j H. BULLINGER AND K. GUALTER TO T. BEZA.- 29/ different. As we could not withdraw our entire confidence in the bishops, who have acted in all other respects as men of piety and integrity, we were unwilling to fight and contend with these men, so much after the manner of masters of defence, and therefore declined any farther discussion. What need of more words? The fault seems to have arisen at first from too much rigour on their part, and that in course of time the contest increased, and grew warm, as is always the case when people quarrel : and that the feelings have been so exasperated on both sides, that each party is now to blame, and hardly any remedy can be discovered for this mischief. It certainly appears from the conversation of these men that their* minds are entirely set against the bishops ; for they can scarcely say any thing respecting them but what is painted in the blackest colours, and savours of the most perfect hatred ~. We must therefore en- treat the Lord, the ruler of all hearts, to remedy this miserable state of tilings. What you write, among other things, that you think this evil is to be mitigated rather by patience than by any querulous accusations, would be exceedingly approved of by us, if they also would approve of it. And for ourselves indeed, as we have no power to dictate to the bishops, so we positively refused to take part against them when they were pleading their own cause, and making a probable defence both of themselves and their con- duct ; nor would we appear to take part with these their accusers, and so be mixed up in this controversy. Meanwhile we promised these our brethren with godly commiseration, that we would write to the bishops, and intercede with them on their behalf; which promise, God willing, we will faithfully perform at the next Frank- fort fair. And we can do nothing else at present. They shewed us moreover a petition prepared to be presented to the most illustrious prince, the elector palatine^. We did not deter them from their purpose ; for possibly the Lord may be pleased even by these means to quiet those unhappy disputes. This is the sum of our transactions with them, although we had determined among ourselves to have nothing more to do with any one in this contro- versy, whether in conversation or by letter ; and this is now our decided resolution. And if any other parties think of coming hither, let them know that they will come to no purpose. You will do us a great favour, if you will give us an accurate account of the French affairs, about which, and the queen especially, [2 Odium Vatiniamim, so called from Vatinius, noted for his scurrility and abusiveness. Sec Cic. in Vatiii. and Catull. 14. 3.] [3 See the following letter.] 298 H. BULLINGER AND R. GUALTER TO T. REZA. [lET. there are spread wonderful reports. We are in suspense about theni', and therefore pray the Lord to overturn the crafty and cruel counsels of the ungodly, and not so much to preserve the churches from evil, as to reconcile them to himself by true faith and amend- ment of hfe. For otherwise we fear, and not without reason, that grievous calamities are hanging over us. I will take care that your letter directed to Zanchius shall be faithfully delivered in a few days. That Baldwin' of whom you write has found fault with me in a public lecture at Paris, as a student writes me word from that city, upon the subject of human traditions, and quotes a passage from the second chapter of my Apocalypse. He has added also to his censure a barefaced falsehood, that he had conferred with me upon this matter, and that I had scarcely any thing to urge in reply; whereas he never accosted me but once, and that in a cursory way, and never conversed with me upon any subject at all. But these men shall proceed no farther, as the Apostle says ; for their condemnation shall be manifest unto all. Farewell. Master Gualter salutes you. All the rest of the brethren salute you. Do you also salute our brethren who are with you. Zurich, Aug. 3, 1567. H. BuLLiNGER the elder, in Gualter's name and his own. CXXX. G. WITHERS TO THE ELECTOR PALATINE'". [B. 62.] [Without place or date.] It is not through our fault, most noble prince, that we send you this petition ; but violence compels us to do so, religion urges us, om* country demands it of us, in fine, the church of England [1 See above, Letter LXXIII, p. 158, note 1.] [2 " Among the German princes, Frederic III. elector Palatine, in the year 1560, substituted the followers of Calvin's doctrines in place of the Lutheran teachers, whom he displaced, and ordered his subjects to receive the rites and opinions of the Genevans. His successor Lewis, in the year 1576, rescinded the acts of his father, and restored the Lutheran doctrine to its former dignity and authority. But this again fell, on the accession of John Casimir to the government of the Palatine countries in 1583 : for he, with his deceased father, Frederic III. had gone over to the side of the re- foiTTicd, and it was necessary again to give Calvinism the pre-eminence. From that time onward, the Palatine church held the second rank among the reformed churches: and it possessed such influence over the others, that the religious instructions, composed for its use by Zechariah Ursinus, and denominated the Heidelberg Catechism, were received nearly throughout the CXXX.] G. WITHERS TO THE ELECTOR PALATINE. 299 now lying prostrate, and (unless some assistance be afforded to her) on the very brink of destruction, drives us as it were head- long to adopt this measure. Yet if that affection towards the church and especial regard to all godly persons, which so greatly distinguish you above all other princes, were not sufficiently made known to us, we should never have presumed to seek shelter under your protection. But now since these things are no secret, (for how can that be a secret which is manifest to every one ?) it is no wonder that we are easily persuaded that you will afford to the distressed that protection which you have already led them to hope for at your hands. Wherefore, most excellent prince, if, humble as we are in station and unknown to you, overwhelmed as we are by various calamities, we entreat your succour on behalf of our afflicted church, this is not an act of presumption on our part ; and though indeed we may seem a little too bold, you will yet allow us so much liberty of complaining, as you may consider to be warranted by our godly sorrow. For Satan, though he Jias not been able to do us mischief in open warfare, is making secret attacks upon the church of England ; and as he is unable to restore popery altogether, he is endeavouring, but imperceptibly and by degrees, to bring us back to Lutheranism. In which as there are many things to be regretted, so there is nothing more grievous than that it is not now by means of his papists, not by means of men glutted with the blood of the saints, not by most abandoned individuals, but by means of our own selves, by means of those who were heretofore accounted the best of men, he is now endeavouring to bring the best of men into danger : and those whom he could not destroy by violence, or sword, or fire, he now hopes to overwhelm by the authority of our own people, and by the opinions and superstition of those who profess the gospel. But that you may more plainly and fully perceive and under- stand the nature of the case, it is necessary to point out to you the first rise and origin of the church upon its first beginning and ap- pearance among us, and then its progress and various vicissitudes ; that you may thereby learn both how far removed we have always been from perfection, and yet how far we have gone back from that liberty to which, by the blessing of Christ, we had at one whole body." Mosheim. cd. Soames, Vol. in. p. 384, whore the following authorities are quoted : Henry Alting's Historia Eccles. Palatince, in Lud. Christ. Mieg's Monumenta Palatina, Tom. i. p. 223, &c. Loscher's Historia Motuum, Part n. Lib. iv. cap. iv. p. 125. Salig's Historic der Augsberg Con- fession, Vol. III. Book IX. ch. V. p. 433, &c.] SOO G. WITHERS TO TH^ ELECTOR PALATINE. [lET» time attained. Under the auspices of Henry, the eighth of that name, England drove away the Roman Antichrist* from all her borders, but yet in such a manner as that his authority seemed not so much suppressed, as transferred to the king. The mass and other rehcs of popish filthiness retained their former place and estimation. After the pope was cast out, the monasteries were every where destroyed. Monks, friars, nuns, were obhged to lay aside and change their designation and habit; pilgrimages were afterwards forbidden, and the images, by means of which such abominable idolatry was committed, were taken down and broken in pieces; and then, towards the very close of his reign, the bible ^ printed in the vulgar tongue was allowed to all, and the priests in every church were ordered to recite in Enghsh the Lord's prayer, the creed, the ten commandments, and the epistle and gospel of the day^. And these were the foundations laid in the reign of Henry, upon whose decease prince Edward^ of pious memory succeeded to the throne ; who having called together the most noble and learned men throughout the realm began to reform the church after their advice. He ordered all the statues and images^ every where to be tlirown down and broken in pieces. Next, he every where abolished the mass and prayers in a foreign language. He permitted the laity to receive the cup as well as the bread in the communion of the Lord's supper. He set forth a form of public prayer written in Enghsh ; which however scarcely differed in any respect from the Latin, except that all the most glaring errors were abohshed. The administration of the sacraments altogether savours of Lutheranism. The clergy^ were allowed to marry, and their children legitimated [1 For an account of the various legislative provisions by which, in 1534, the power of the papacy in England was wholly destroyed, see Soames, Hist. Ref. I. 429, &c., and Burnet, Ref. i. 236.] [2 A royal proclamation issued in May 1540, rendered every parish which should not be provided with a bible before the next festival of All-hallows, liable to a penalty of forty shillings per mor>th as long as this omission should continue. Sec Soames, n. 453, Burnet, i. 486.] [3 See Soames, Hist. Ref. ii. 168.] [4 Edward VI. began to reign Jan. 28, 1547.] [5 On Feb. 11, 1548, Cranmer received an order of coimcil for transmis- sion through his province, enjoining the indiscriminate removal of images from churches. This order was signed by the protector, the earl of Arundel, the lord Russell, Sir Thomas SejTnom-, Sir Antony Wingfield, and Sir William Paget. Sec Soames, ni. 227, Bm-net, ii. 95, and iv. 270, where he has given a copy of the original document.] [6 For an account of the acts of parliament authorising the marriage of the clergy, see Burnet, ii. 141, 306.] CXXX.l G. WITHERS TO THE ELECTOR PALATINE. 301 by an express act of parliament. Altars", organs, the theatrical dresses of the papists, and other things of the like kind were re- tained under the name of ornaments of the church and of the ministers thereof. Afterwards this godly king, perceiving how far he stiU was from the mark, took in hand the matter afresh, set forth a new form of prayers, removed and prohibited all the monuments of superstition which he had before left, excepting the surplice and kneeling at the Lord's supper, baptizing by women, and demanding of infants a profession of faith. What he retained however was left so free, that no one who objected to them was compelled to observe them. But the king, who truly feared God, not being yet satisfied with these improvements, was about to put the last finish to this work, and appointed a day for the assembhng of both houses of parliament. All were full of hope and expectation ; but in the mean time our most excellent king was taken away by an untimely death^. His sister Mary succeeded as heir to the kingdom : would that she had inherited his piety also ! Every thing was then sud- denly changed, and the papacy entirely re-established. But why should I make mention of circumstances so notorious? I will now come to those with which you are probably unacquainted. Although the church seemed at first to be entirely overthrown, and the godly were dispersed in every quarter, yet a congregation^ of some importance collected itself at London, chose its ministers by common consent, appointed deacons, and, in the midst of enemies more sharp-sighted than Argus and more cruel than Nero, the church of God was again restored entire, and, in a word, complete in all its parts, And though it was often dispersed by the attacks of its enemies, and a very great number of its members ^° perished [7 On the 24th of November, 1550, a circular letter was addressed from the council to Bishoi^ Ridley and other prelates, enjoining them to remove all altars within their respective dioceses, and to set up a table instead thereof. For disobedience to this injunction, Day, bishop of Chichester, was committed to the Fleet. Soames, iii. 573, &c. See also bishop Ridley's in- junctions at his visitation in the same year, as given in his works, Parker Society's Edition, pp. 319, 321. Also bishop Hooper's Sermons on Jonas, Parker Soc. Ed. p. 488.] [8 Edward VI. died July 6, 1553.] [9 For an account of this congregation see Foxe, also Strypc, Mem. m. ii. 147. Among their ministers were Edmund Seamier, afterwards bishop of Peterborough, and Thomas Bentham, afterwards bishop of Coventry and Lichfield.] [10 Among these were John Rough, and Cuthbert Simpson, ministers of the abovcnaraed congregation, and Margaret Hearing, Hugh Foxe, and John 302 G. WITHERS TO THE ELECTOR PALATINE. [lET. at the stake, it nevertheless grew and increased every day. In the mean time Mary died. Her sister Elizabeth began her reign ^ to the exceeding joy of all. Then those^ who had been detained in confine- ment and in chains for the sake of rehgion, were set at hberty by the queen's command ; those who had been driven into exile^ returned home again. But the church which had survived in the midst of the flTimes was abolished by some sort of edict*. This indeed was a matter of no difficulty, because there was a general expectation that one not less pure would be re-established by the authoi'ity of the queen and the laws of the kingdom. The high parhament of the Avhole realm was assembled, popery again cast out, and the second form of prayers, which Edward left behind him at his death, was restored to the church. But the ceremonies, which, as was above stated, were retained in the church at the first reformation of Ed- ward, are restored under the same name. Power, moreover, was given to the queen and the archbishop, to introduce whatever ad- ditional ceremonies they might think proper ; and they immediately afterwards both discontinued the ordinary bread heretofore used in the administration of the Lord's supper, and, for the sake of a newer reformation, adopted the round wafer ^, after the pattern of that used by the papists. And at the pronouncing of the name of Jesus they have ordered all persons to take off their hats and bow their knees. Then on the expulsion of the popish bishops new ones were to be appointed in their room ; and most of these were of the number of those who had been exiles. These at first began to oppose the ceremonies ; but afterwards, when there was no hope otherwise of obtaining a bishopric, they yielded, and, as one of them openly acknowledged, undertook the office against their conscience. In the mean while they comforted their brethren, whom they per- Devenish. An account of their martyrdoms is given in Foxe's Acts and Monu^ ments. Vol. vm. 443, &c. Edit. 1839.] [1 Queen Elizabeth began her reign, Nov. 17, 1558.] [2 A list of some of these is given in Strype, Ann. i. i. 55. The various orders for their enlargement were dated in Dec. 1558.] [3 Of these there were above eight huntked. A list of the chief of them is given in Strype, Cranmer, 449, and Mem. ni. i. 231.] [4 We find that an order was sent to the lord mayor of London to commit one Thomas Pan*ys to prison, till fm-ther order should be taken by the coun- cil, for suffering, contrary to the queen's proclamation, which prohibited all preaching, assemblies of people to meet at Worcester house, whereof he had the keeping. See Strype, Ann. i. i. 59.] [5 See Soames, Eliz. Rel. Hist. 243, and Strype, Parker n. 343.] CXXX.] G. WITHERS TO THE ELECTOR PALATINE. 303 ceived to be still struggling against these things, by promising them free liberty in the government of their churches ; and for some years they kept this promise. On the obtaining of which liberty, they diligently purified their churches from all the blemishes and defilements of popery. Others, who had at first yielded, incited by their example, began to reform their churches in the like manner. But when the bishops perceived that the number and influence of these parties was increasing among the people, they thought their dignity would come to nought, unless they compelled the inferior clergy to adopt the same usages as they did themselves. They took up the matter therefore at the queen's command^. They de- prived Sampson ^ a most learned man, and possessing very great influence in the church, in the hope that the rest would easily be deterred by the fear of hke consequences to themselves. But when, contrary to their expectation, they found them all more prepared for resistance, they made a second attempt ; and having summoned to- gether all the ministers^ of the church in London, they required them to promise obedience to all the commands of the queen, either then or hereafter to be issued respecting religion. And when they stated that they could not do this, under existing circumstances, with a safe conscience, more than thirty of them were deprived in one and the selfsame day. But when they found that this plan did not succeed, but that they had excited the hatred of all, and espe- cially of the godly, against them, they devised another mode of attack, by prohibiting any one to expound the scriptures in his parish without an especial hcence under the bishop's own seaP. Besides this, they they have recalled all licenses'" which had been granted before a certain day, and will renew them only to such persons as shall have professed their assent to all their proceedings. If any one should presume to expound the scriptures without their permission, he is brought to trial as being guilty of contempt ; and should he not then conform, they punish him by imprisonment or exile. You perceive therefore, most excellent prince, the wretched [6 The letter of the queen to the archbishop, for redressing disorders in the church, is given in Strypo, Parker, in. 65.] [■^ See above, p. 226, and Soames, Ehz. Rel. Hist. 54.] [8 The London ministers were cited before the ecclesiastical commis- sioners at Lambeth, towards the end of March, 1504. Strype, Ann. i. ii. 129. See Soames, Eliz. Rel. Hist. 46.] P The form of hcence for preaching is given by Strype, Parker, in. 122.] [1*^ All licences granted before March 1, 1564, were to be void and of none effect. Sparrow's Collections, 121.] o04 O. WITHERS TO THE ELECTOR PALATINE. [lET. aspect of the church of England ; you perceive into what an un- sightly state it has fallen. For there being three chief parts of the church, wholesome doctrine, the pure administration of the sacraments, and a rightly constituted ministry, Avhich part also includes a vigorous discipline ; I will not touch upon the doctrine of our church, which, though sound in most respects, is however lame in others. In what way the sacraments are disfigured by human inventions, will easily appear from the public form of prayer, the royal injunctions, and the admonitions, or (as they call them) the advertisements', of the bishops. But the ministry is in fact notliing at all, nor is there any discipline. For those persons cannot be said to be ministers of Christ, but servants of men, who can do nothing according to the prescript of the word, but are obliged to act in every respect at the nod of the queen and the bishops. What must we say, when most of them are popish priests, consecrated to perform mass ; and the far greater part of the remainder are most ignorant persons, appointed at the will of the people, not to the ministry of the word, but to repeat the office of the day or festival, which almost any child might do with- out difficulty ? What must we say, when those who preside over the churches are allowed to be absent from them for the sake of study or attendance on other things? What, when there is an innumerable multitude of persons who have neither any church nor fixed appointment ? What, when preaching is a privilege confined to the bishops, who are however but seldom at leisure for this office ? What, lastly, when the sword of excommunication is taken out of the hands of the clergy and handed over to lawyers ? What kind of a church, most illustrious prmce, must you think that to be, in which you can neither hear of the pure administration of the sacraments, nor indeed of any ministry whatever, save of this description ? '/^ Wherefore, if you possess any interest or influence with our most serene queen, we beg and entreat you to make use of it in so godly a cause, to heal these so great maladies of the church, and to condemn for evermore the entire remembrance of popery ;''l)ut in such a way that, if you cannot, as we desire, obtain a more complete reformation of the whole church, you will nevertheless earnestly entreat and obtain, (and this we hope you will be able to accomplish,) for those who abominate the relics of antichrist, the [1 For an account of the book of Advertisements, see Soames, Eliz. Rel. Hist. 42, Strype, Ann. i. ii. 130, and Parker, i. 313. It is printed in Bishop Sparrow's Collections, 121.] CXXX.] G. WITHERS TO THE ELECTOR PALATINE. 305 liberty of not being obliged either to adopt them against their con- science, or to reUnquish the ministry. And if, most excellent prince, you wish well to us and to our church, which we certainly persuade ourselves to be the case, you must take especial care to transfer all the blame from the queen unto the bishops, who do not act the part of her advisers with the freedom that becomes them, and which it is right they should exercise. For as to their asserting both at home and to foreio-ners that they do not themselves approve these measures, but that they execute them at the instigation of the queen, they both themselves command them in books publicly set forth for that very object, and state that it is done by the queen after good and pious counsel, and for the benefit of the whole church. So that it is not to be wondered at, if, deceived by their blandishments and flatteries, she adopts some severe measures against us as though we were rebel- lious and contumacious. But as we know that you are of your own inclination sufficiently disposed to help us, and as it is not right that you should any longer be detained by us from the most important business of your commonwealth, we will not enlarge our statement any farther, but will now bring it to a close. [George Withers.] CXXXI. R. HILLES TO H. BULLINGER. [B. 03.] London, Aug. 23, 1567. I PRAY for you, honoured sir, and very dear friend, much health. I received, four months since, from John Abel (who also desires his best respects) a large volume, namely your Isaiah, as expounded in your homilies, together with your very gratifying letter, dated on the 25th of last February. You have presented me with that volume, that I may have this gift from you as a memorial of our uninterrupted fricndsliip, which, God wilUng, it shall be. I have also purchased from my very dear brother, the afore- said John Abel, the book of Daniel with the epitome, expounded in your sixty-six homilies. Both books delight me exceedingly, and I hope that the homilies in each volume will be productive of no little benefit to faithful and diligent readers. As to your desire of certain information respecting the affairs of Brabant, and your request that 1 should be mindful of you in this matter to the utmost of my power, whether occupied or disen- 20 306 n. lilLLES TO II. BULLINGEE. [lET. gaged ; I have now to inform you, my very dear sir, that I have ah-eady committed to writing all that I myself know for certain about these matters, or have been able to ascertain from my friends ; and that from such information I have written as it were a little history. And if I can get it translated into Latin (which a school- master of my acquaintance has promised to undertake for me), I will send it you, or at least to Frankfort for you, at the next Lent fair, should it please God that I live till that time. I am very glad that your two youngest grown up daughters so prudently and judiciously manage your household concerns, as that you can remain a widower^ without discomfort. It is stated here as a fact, that the duke of Alva^ who has lately come to Louvaine or Ghent with the forces of the king of Spain, which he has stationed there in lower Germany and at Antwerp in the name of that sovereign, intends to take away the liberties and privileges of all the cities of that country which ad- mitted, or freely permitted, the preaching of the protestants during the past year, and to reduce the lower Germany under a regular monarchy. May the will of the Lord be done, without whose per- mission he can do nothing ! Let us heartily pray him to deign to give us peace in our days. This indeed still remains undisturbed, by the blessing of God, in this realm of England ; except that some of our preachers (though not among the most learned), kept back by too great scrupulosity, or overcome by vain-glory or some measure of popular applause, are still occasionally distm'bing it by impugning or opposing the ordinance of the queen and the whole realm, touching the use or wearing of the surplice in the church during the singing of the psalms, the reading of the lessons, and the administration of the sacraments. But I am of opinion with holy Jerome (in his first book against the Pelagians), that it is no offence against God, for a bishop, presbyter, and deacon, and all other ecclesiastics to walk in a white garment in the administration of the sacraments'^. Moreover, religion requires one kind of habit [1 Bullinger lost liis wife in 1564. She died of the plague, as also did three of his dauglitei-s, who were married to Hulric Zuinglius, Lewis Lavater, and Josiali Simler, all ministers of Zui-ich.] [2 " The king of Spain's army, led by the duke of Alva, hath aheady passed through Franche Comte and Lorraine, between Metz, Thou, and Ver- dun ; so as it is thought by this they are come to Luxembom-g." Sir Henry Non-is to (jueen Elizabeth. July 23, 1567. MS. Sloane 4126.] [3 Undo adjungis, gloriam vestium et ornamentorum Deo esse contrariam. Qure sunt, rogo, inimicitia; contra Deum, si tunicam habuero mundiorem ; si episcopus, presbyter, et diaconus, ct reliquus ordo ecclesiasticus in adminis- CXXXI.] R. HILLES TO H. BULLINGER. 307 for the ministry, and another for common use and daily life : and the Egyptian priests (who, as you well know, were Christians in the time of Jerome) wore linen garments not only in divine service, but in common use. (Commentary on Ezek. Lib. xiii. c. 44.)* And truly the disciples of Christ, as much as lieth in them, must follow peace with all men, and not be a stumbling-block to imbehevers or to the churches of God. We must pray the Lord to make us all of one mind to dwell in the house of God, which is the church, and to remove all unnecessary contentions and causes of offence. May the Lord preserve you! London, Aug. 23, 1567. Yours from my heart, &c. Richard Hilles. CXXXII. H. BULLINGER AND R. GUALTER TO BISHOPS GRINDAL, SANDYS AND PARKHURST. [B. G4.] Zurich, jlug. 20, 1567. Reverend sirs, right worshipful masters, and very dear bre- thren in the Lord. May the Lord Jesus bless you, and preserve you from all evil ! In proportion to our exceeding regard for you, reverend masters and very dear brethren, is our grief at the sad dissensions between you and some of your brethren, learned men, who have been deprived of their ministerial offices in England. You must impute it therefore to our sincere affection, that we have repeatedly wearied your ears with the same complaint. We have seen and received your apology for your conduct in this matter ; but some English exiles have come to us in the mean time, who affirm that the doctors of the church in London, and also of other churches in England, men who had been tried in the Marian persecution, and by whose fidelity and diligence the AngHcan churches were pre- served during those most cruel times, are now turned out ; and not merely turned out, but oppressed Avith grievous persecution, and even cast into loathsome prisons. They add, that there arc many ministers of tho churches in L'cland, who m their opinions and conduct arc nowise different from those very persons who are suf- tratione sacrificioi-um cum Candida vcste processerint ? Adv. Pelag. Lib. i. cap. 9. Tom. ii. p. 277. Aiitv. 1579.] [■1 Vcstibus lincis iituntur ^gyptii saccrdotes, non solum intrinsecus, sed et cxtrinsccus. Porro religio divina altoruui habitum habct in ministerio, altcrum in usu vitaquc communi. Tom. iv. p. 476.] 20—2 308 H. BULLINGRR AND R. GUALTRR TO BISHOP GRINDAL, &C. [lET. fering persecution in England ; but that by the favour of their bishop, and his intercession with the queen's majesty, they are living in the greatest tranquillity. "Whence they conclude that, if the bishops who are in England would also intercede with the queen's majesty, they themselves would be allowed quietly to retain their charge of the churches committed to them. And they state, what is very important in this question, that the bishops do not deny that those who are persecuted and degraded have the better cause : for they acknowledge that the church would be established on a better footing, and governed when so established, without those ceremonies and rites and institutions than with them ; so that if the option Avere allowed them, they would rather make choice of a church without them, than that one thus burdened should be committed to their charge. And this is also most evident from this fact, that the bishops have more than once requested of her majesty in parliament that they might be removed, and the church thereby become more purified and beautified, or at least less bur- dened. Wherefore, reverend sirs and very dear brethren, your piety will doubtless stir you up to consult by what means convenient and speedy succour may be afforded to these afilicted brethren, and that they may not be oppressed with so cruel a persecution ; but rather that by the clemency of the queen's majesty they may be tolerated in the kingdom, and that the gifts which are in them, so useful to the church, may not be quenched by their abdication. But we need not by many arguments or examples incite you, who are most experienced in all that is godly and just : we only entreat you by the Lord, that if it be in your power either to alleviate or altogether remove the distress of these oppressed persons by your influence with the queen's majesty, you will, for the sake of chris- tian love, aiford them your assistance with all faithfulness ; and take in good part this our brotherly admonition, and continue to regard us, who have the greatest love for you, with your wonted affection. Farewell, honoured masters. Zurich, Aug. 26, 1567. BULLINGER and GUALTER. ~ CXXXIII. BISHOP GRINDAL TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 81.] London, Aug. 29, 1567. Health in Christ our Saviour. The affairs of Scotland, respect- ing which I promised in my last letter to write more fully, are CXXXUI.] BISHOP GRINDAL TO H. BULLINGER. 309 now in this condition. The nobility of the kingdom, having taken offence at the marriage of the queen of Scots with the regicide Bothwell, about the end of June last collected together a numerous body of troops. When Bothwell, who had also assembled some forces, discovered his inferiority, he fled with four or five ships to the Orkney islands. The queen surrendered herself to her nobles, who conveyed her to a strongly fortified castle in the middle of the lake called Lochleven, where she is still in custody. After some days the queen by a solemn public instrument ^ resigned her royal dignity to the prince her son, who was crowned king of Scotland towards the end - of the July following. Not long after was held a convention ^ of the estates, in which were decreed these five things : first, they declared the Lord James Stuart, earl of Murray, or Moray, of whose piety I think I have before written to you, the king's guardian and regent of the kingdom. Kext, they prohibited, under a heavy penalty, all exercise of the popish religion. Thirdly, an universal reformation of the churches was determined upon. Fourthly, the stipends of the clergy were confirmed and augmented. Fifthly, and lastly, they decreed that the advisers and perpetrators of the king's murder should be sought out and punished. The queen is still kept in the closest confinement, and there are those who think it will be perpetual. It is reported that there were found in Bothwell's writing desk some letters Avritten in the queen's* own [1 The confederate lords, by putting the queen in fear of death, compelled her, unheard, to set her hand to three writings ; by the fii'st Avhereof she resigned the kingdom to her son, who was scarce thirteen months old : by another she constituted Murray to be vice-roy or regent in the minority of her son ; and by the third, slie named, in case Mm'ray should refuse the charge, these governors over her sou, James, duke of Chatelherault, Matthew, earl of Lennox, Gillespie, earl of Argyle, John, earl of Athol, James, earl of Morton, Alexander, earl of Glencairn, and John, earl of Mar. Camden's Elizabeth, p. 96. " She was m-ged to the resignation of the crown by the im- placable Lindsay, who with his mailed hand seized the delicate arm of the queen, and swore that unless she subscribed the deeds without delay, he would sign them himself with her blood, and seal them on her heart." Mackie, Castles of Q. Mary, p. 202.] [2 He was proclaimed July 29, by the name of James VI., and soon after crowned at StMing. Hume.] [3 Sir Nicholas Throgmorton writes to the earl of Bedford, in a letter dated Edenborowghe, July 20, 1567, and iDrescrved in the state paper office, " The assembly contynueth the 20th day of tliys moneth : whei'o I thynke lytle wyl be done to the queue of Scotlandc's advantage."] [^ This subject has long been involved in great uncertainty. On the one side, Camden states that some servants of Bothwell's, Avho were put to death 310 BISHOP GRINDAL TO H. BULLINGER. [lET. hand, in wliicli she exhorted Bothwell to accelerate the death of the king, her husband. How true this may be, I know not. A certain baron (Grange ^ by name) was lately dispatched with four armed vessels in pursuit of Bothwell. For it is now generally agreed that he strangled the king with his own hands, and then blew up the house with gunpowder, that it might appear accidental. From this you may easily imagine what great and terrible commotions have lately taken place in Scotland. In the mean time we entertain the most lively hopes, that all these things will turn out to the further ad- vancement of evangehcal doctrine. John Knox has lately returned, amidst the great rejoicing of the people, to his church in Edinburgh, from which he had heretofore been altogether banished. Thus much of the affairs of Scotland. Our own are pretty much in the same state as when the bishop of Winchester and my- self last wrote to you. All men's minds are not yet settled, but we are daily hoping for an improvement. We were exceedingly glad that no attack was made last summer upon the people of Berne or Geneva ; for we were much afraid that the duke of Savoy, with the aid of Spain, would have done them some great mischief. You will salute from me master Gualter and your other colleagues. May the Lord bless you and your labours, and preserve your piety in safety as long as possible to his church ! London, Aug. 29, 1567. Your most devoted in the Lord, Edmund Grindal, bishop of London. With respect to the acts passed in the general assembly of the kingdom, I will briefly write you a summary of those by which the true rehgion of Chi'ist is estabhshed, and the impious superstition of the papists abolished. I shall however omit such as relate to the civil government of the kingdom, as it would be a work of infinite labour to record them ; and besides most unnecessary, to yourself by MuiTay for being present at the murdering of the king, protested at the gallows that they understood from Bothwell, that Mm-ray and Morton were the authors of the king's death. The queen they cleared from all suspicion ; as Bothwell also himself, being prisoner in Denmark, many times witnessed, both living and dying, with a religious asseveration, that the queen was not privy thereto : as did also Morton, fourteen years after. See Camden's Eliz. p. 97. On the other side, however, Soames, in his Elizabethan History, p. 87, obseiTes, "Her guilt is unquestionable, if certain letters and sonnets, produced as evidence against her, be genuine ; and tliat they are is more than probable." Robertson's dissertation, he adds, at the close of his history, fully and accm-ately discusses the genuineness of these conclusive docu- ments.] [1 Kirkaldy of Grange. See note 4, p. 295.] CXXXIII.] mSHOP GRINDAL TO H. BULLINGER. 311 especically, whom I fully believe to be sufficiently acquainted with them all. 1. First, then, not only are all the impious traditions and ceremonies of the papists taken away, but also that tyranny which the pope himself has for so many ages exercised over the church, is altogether abolished ; and it is provided that all persons shall in future acknowledge him to be the very antichrist, and son of per- dition, of whom Paul speaks. 2. The mass is abohshed, as being an accursed abomination and a diabohcal profanation of the Lord's supper ; and it is forbidden to all persons in the whole kingdom of Scotland either to celebrate or hear it : should any one do otherwise, on the first offence all his goods, whether moveable, as they say, or immoveable, are forfeited to the exchequer, and the offenders themselves are to be punished at the discretion of the magistrate in whose jurisdiction they shall have been apprehended. For the second offence they are to bo punished with banishment ; the third is capital. 3. All those acts of parliament are repealed, by which the pope's authority in the bygone times of darkness had been either declared or confirmed. 4. The king's coronation is confirmed, because the queen, his mother, voluntarily laid down the royal authority, and appointed him by her letters to be proclaimed king. 5. The lord James, earl of Moray, is elected regent, as they call it, of the kingdom ; and authority is given to him to administer the government in the king's name ; and this, until the king him- self shall have attained his seventeenth year. This too was done at the command of the queen, who also fixed the time of liis majority. 6. A form of oath is prescribed, which all future sovereigns are to take at the time they are proclaimed. They must solemnly promise and swear that they will endeavour, to the utm.ost of their power, that the christian religion which is now preached throughout the whole kingdom shall bo faithfully retained, without being con- taminated by any traditions of papists and other heretics, which oppose its purity. 7. In the seventh is prescribed the mode of presenting bene- fices to those who shall undertake the ofiice of the ministry. Those to whom belongs the hereditary right of patronage arc to present some one to the church, whom if the church shall upon dihgcnt ex- amination find to be duly qualified, she shall admit [to the living] ; if S12 BISHOP GRINDAL TO H. BULLINGER. [lET. otherwise, she must reject him, and appoint to that office a more worthy candidate. 8. None are to be appointed judges, scribes, notaries, pubhc apparitors, and beadles, until they have made a profession of the christian reho-ion. 9. The third only of the tithes is to be paid to the ministers of God's word, so long as until, after the decease of the old incum- bents, they may enjoy the entire benefice. 10. None shall be admitted to the instruction of youth in learning and morals, until he shall have made an open profession of religion. 11. Authority is given to ministers that they may sincerely preach the word of God, lawfully administer the sacraments, and sharply reprove the vices and corrupt manners of the people. 12. The patrons of those preferments which the mass-priests heretofore enjoyed in the colleges, may now convert them to the support of those whom we commonly call bursars^, into the number of whom are generally chosen such young men as, being without friends or means of support, would otherwise be unable to procure a learned education. 13. A punishment is decreed against fornicators. For on the first offence they are to pay eighty^ pounds, or to be committed to prison for eight days, and there fed only upon bread and the smallest beer : they are afterwards, on the next market-day, to be placed in some conspicuous situation whence they may easily be seen by every one, there to remain from ten o'clock till twelve, with their heads uncovered, and bound with rings of iron. For a second offence the penalty is one hundred and thirty pounds^, or sixteen days' imprisonment upon bread and water : then, as before, they are to be exposed to the people in the public market, with the addition of having their heads shaved. For the third offence the penalty is two hundred pounds^, or imprisonment for thrice the former number of days ; and at the expiration of that time, after having been dipped three times in deep water, they are to be for ever banished from the city or parish. Both the man and woman, as often as they shall offend, are liable to these punish- ments. 14. Incest is made a capital offence. Nothing however was [1 Or exhibitioners.] [2 Pounds Scotch, i.e. of 20c7. each, in all £6. 13s. 4rf.] [3 i.e. £lO. 16s. Sd.] [4 i.e. £l6. 13s. 4d.] CXXXIII.] BISHOP GRINDAL TO H. BULLINGER. 313 determined upon in the assembly with regard to adultery ; but the consideration of that crime was deferred till the next session. 15. Marriages contracted between persons related in the second degree, such as those between brothers' and sisters'" [children], are declared lawful. CXXXIV. BISHOP GRINDAL TO T. BEZA AND OTHERS. [B. G6.] London, April 17, 1568. Health in Christ. Master John Cousins, the most faithful minister of the French church in this country, and my very dear brother in the Lord, has this day shewn me a letter that he has written to you upon the state of the Dutch church in London, and which he sends together with this. In that letter the origin and substance of all the controversies in the said church are set forth with the greatest simpHcity and truth. I pray you therefore, very dear brethren, to give full credit to that letter, and aid with your counsel not only the Dutch church in London, but also the other churches of that language ; and earnestly exhort them to be zealous in the promotion of peace and imity. I doubt not but that your exhortations and admonitions will have great influence with them. I would have written somewhat more fully upon this subject, and also upon the state of our own churches, had not a disorder in my eyes, which succeeded a tertian ague, prevented me from doing so. But the Lord, I hope, will afford me a better opportunity at some future time. May the Lord preserve you, my very dear brethren, and bless your ministry ! London, April 17, 1568. Yours in Christ, Edmund Grindal, bishop of London. CXXXV. BISHOP GRINDAL TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 82.] London, June 11, 1568. Health in Christ. Your affectionate letters, I believe, have all reached me, for which I return you my best thanks. I did not reply to them at the time of the last Frankfort fair, because at the beginning of Lent I was suffering with a tertian ague, which was succeeded by a disease in my eyes ; but by the mercy of the Lord I am now recovered. I congratulate you and the people of Geneva on the quiet pos- 814 EISHOP GRINDAL TO H. BULLINGER. [lET. turc of aiFairs, which indeed is almost miraculous ; for you have on every side the most bitter adversaries. > Our controversy concerning the habits, about which you write, had cooled down for a time, but broke out again last winter ; and this by the means of some who are more zealous than they are either learned or gifted with pious discretion. Some London citizens^ of the lowest order, together with four or five ministers, remarkable neither for their judgment nor learning, have openly separated from us ; and sometimes in private houses, sometimes in the fields, and occasionally even in ships, they have held their meetings and administered the sacraments. Besides this, they have ordained ministers, elders, and deacons, after their own way, and have even excommunicated some who had seceded from their church. And because masters Laurence Humphrey, Sampson, Lever, and others, who have suffered so much to obtain liberty in respect of things indifferent, will not unite with them, they now regard them as semi-papists, and will not allow their followers to attend their preaching-. The number of this sect is about two hundred, but consisting of more women than men. The privy council have lately committed the heads of this faction to prison, and are using every means to put a timely stop to this sect. You are, I suppose, well acquainted with the state of affairs in France and the Netherlands. New commotions have lately arisen in Scotland. On the second of May last the queen, who was kept a prisoner in the castle of Lochleven^, having bribed her keepers, [1 See Strype, Life of Grindal, p. 168, &c.] [2 When Bishop Grindal reproved some of this party for not going to chui'ch, one of them replied, that ho had as lief go to mass, as to somQ churches ; on which the bishop said, that they ought not to find fault with all for a few, and that they might go to other places ; and particularly men- tioned Laurence, and Sampson, and Lever, who preached in London, being dispensed with, though they wore not the habits, besides Coverdale. See Strype, Grindal, p. 171.] [3 George Douglas, brother to the laird of Lochleven, conveyed her in disguise into a small boat, and himself rowed her on shore. Hume. See Camden, Eliz. p. 108. She had previously attempted an escape on the 25th of March, the manner of whicli is thus related in a letter of Sir William Drury to Cecil, dated Berwick, April 2, 1568 : "There cometh into her the landresse early as at other tymes before she was wonted, and the queue (ac- cording to such a secret practice) putteth on the weede (clothes) of her landresse, and so, with the fardcll of clothes and her mulHcr upon her face, passeth out and entreth tlic bote to pass the Loughe, which, after some space, one of them that rowed said merrily, ' Lett us see Avhat manner of dame this is!' and therewith offered to pull downe her mufllcr; which to r CXXXV.] niSHOP GRINDAL TO H. RULLTNGER. 315 escaped from confinement, and fled to Castle Hamilton*, where she collected troops^. On the 13th of May the lieutenant of the king- dom, (called the regent,) assembled his forces and engaged in a skirmish with the queen's party ^. Her army was put to flight : about a hundred escaped ; the rest, who could have been destroyed to a man, were allowed quarter ; but she herself, with a few attend- ants, fled to the sea', and going on board a small vessel, crossed the narrow frith at the mouth of the river Solway, and arrived at the city of Carlisle, which is in this kingdom. She still remains, but however in honourable custody, in the castle^ of that city. The defend she put upp her hands ; which they espyed to be very fayre and white, wherewith they entered into suspition whom she was, beginning to wonder at her enterprise. Whereat she was little dismayed, but chardged them uppon danger of their Hves to rowe her over to the shore, which they nothing re- garded, but eftesones rowed her back agayne, promising her that it shud be secreted, and in especiall from the lord of the house under whoso gard she Meth." MS. Cotton. Calig. c. i. 53.] [4 « The queue would willingly have gone for her more suerty to Dum- barton castle ; but the Ambletons wyll not therunto condescend, alledging that there she should be in lyttell better estate then in Loghleven, consydering the practice that the Lord of Ledington would use to the Lord Fleming. But as that may be one cause, so they thynk by having her in theyr pos- session they shol be the stronger, and biyng theyr purpose the better to passe." Sir Wm. Drury to Cecil, May 12, 1568. MS. Cott. Calig. b. ix. 365.] [5 Within a day or two so great a multitude flocked unto her from all parts, that she levied an army of six thousand warriors. Camden, Elizabeth, p. 108. The following letter is given verbatim as it was Avi'itten by her on this occasion to the laird of Nether PoUoc, and which is still preserved in the family : " Traist freind. We greit zow weill. We dowt not hot ze knaw that God of his gudenes has put us at libertie, quhome we thank maist hartlie, qwharefore desyi-es zow ^vt all possible diligence fail not to be heir at us in Hamylton, wt all zor folks, freinds and serwands bodin in feu- of weir as ze will do us acceptable service and plessrs. Becaws we knaw zor qutance [constancy] we neid not at yis pnt (present) to mak langar He (letter) bot will byd zow fair weill. Off Hamylton yo 5 of Maii 1568. (Signed) Marie R." See Mackie, Castles of Q. Mary, p. 12G, who gives a fac-simile of the original letter.] [G Namely, at Langside, near Glasgow, on May 14, as Sir William Drury wi-ites to Cecil from Berwick on the following day. He says, " the earle did his best to stay bloud to be shed, yea, by his contraiyes [enemies] the same is affirmed." MS. Cott. Calig. c. I. 67.] [" She embarked on board a fishing boat in Galloway, and landed the same day at Workington in Cumberland, about thirty miles from Carlisle.] [8 Sir Francis Knolles, who was sent to Carlisle to receive the queen of Scots, writes to Cecil, from Richmond, Thui-sday, May 27th. " The queue of Scotts is staled still at Carlile by the deputie warder's good behaviour and discretion toward her highnes' service." MS. Cott. Calig. b. ix. 290.] 316 BISHOP GRINDAL TO H. BULLINGER. [^LET. queen' of Scotland seeks aid from us, that she may be restored to her kingdom, which under the influence of fear (as she says) she resigned to her son ; or at least, that she may have a safe conduct to France^, where she may make trial of the fidehty of her friends. The Scottish nobles, on the other hand, by their ambassadors, re- quire her to be again dehvered into their custody, alleging it to be unfit for her to resume the crown, who not only procured the death of her husband, but afterwards united herself in an adulterous marriage with liis very murderer, and one too, who had a wife yet hving. What decision will be come to as to these matters, I am yet ignorant. ISIay the Lord overrule them all for good I Whatever it may be, should the Lord spare my life, I will en- deavom* to inform you. Salute, I pray you, master Gualter and the rest of the brethren in my name. May the Lord preserve you, my very reverend friend and dear brother in the Lord I London, June 11, 1568. Your most devoted in the Lord, Edmund Grindal, Bishop of London. Just as I was about to seal this letter, news was brought me, that the duke of Alva, at Brussels, on the fifth of this month, had inflicted capital punishment on the counts Egmont^ and Horn'', and [1 Queen Mary's letter to Elizabeth is given by Camden, Eliz. p. 109.] [2 "Well, sayd she (queen Maij), I woll not detayne this Frenche ambassador untyll Master IMydelmore's comyng, neither woll I be any longer delayed ; for I woll require the quene, my good sister, that either she will lett me go into France, or that she woll put me into Dunbritone, unlesse she woll hold me as a prysoner." Sir F. Knolles to Cecil, from Carlisle, June 21. MS. Cott. Calig. c. i. 107.] [3 Lamoral, Count Egmont, had been ambassador in 1553 from Charles 5th to queen Maiy respecting her marriage with his son Philip. He was afterwards governor in the provinces of Flanders and Ai'tois, and was of so popular a character, that when the duchess of Paima was made regent of the Low Countries, the public voice had akeady nominated Egmont to fill that exalted station. See Burgon's Life and Times of Sir Thomas Gresham, Vol. ii. p. 126, where, in p. 233, is a ciu-ious letter from Sir Richard Clough describing the arrest of the Counts Egmont and Horn.] [4 Philip de Montmorenci, Count Horn, had been governor of the pro- vince of Gucldres, which was taken from him and given to Count Meghem. His trial, with that of Count Hom, is thus noticed in a letter from Sir R. Clough to Sir Thomas Gresham, dated Sept. 15, 1567. " We have news from Brussells, that there are 12 appointed to sit upon the County of Eg- mont and the County of Home ; 2 of them to be of the Lords of the order [of the golden Fleece], and all the rest presidents of the counsell of these Low Countries ; who are all papists (saving one, who is the president of Gawntt, who is takyn for a man of good judgment,) so that by them both they and all the rest shall be tried." Burgon, as above, p. 236.] CXXXV.] BiaHOP GRINDAL TO H. BULLINaER. 8l7 about twenty other noblemen. The man, it seems, is cruel enough by nature, and has descended to this degree of ferocity through irritation at the unfortunate result of the battle near Groningen, with Louis of Nassau. For the duke of Alva, it is reported, lost there two thousand Spaniards and three thousand Walloons, as they call them. There fell also the Count von Orenburg, and some Spanish generals of consequence, Egmont admitted a monk as his confessor, and adored the cross at the very place of execution. The Count Horn rejected all such things, and died in the confession of the truth. CXXXVI. BISHOP PARKHURST TO R. GUALTER AND H. BULLINGER. [A. 83.] LuDiiAM, Auff. 4, 15C8. I WROTE a letter to you at the end of February, and hope it came safe to hand. I received letters from Bullinger and Lavater on the 11th of May, and from you, Gualter, on the 18th of the same month. The queen of Scotland made her escape from prison about the same time. A bloody fight ^ immediately took place be- tween the papists, the friends'' of the queen, and the protestants, who were on the king's side. She was on an eminence", mounted on a swift horse, when the battle was at its height, and had a view of the whole engagement. But when she perceived at length that the victory lay with the regent James and his party, she fled with a few of her attendants into England ; for she had rather trust herself to the English than her own subjects, and I believe it Avas more safe for her to do so. She is now at Carlisle, a town [^ At Langside near Glasgow, May 14th. See note 5, p. 315.] [6 A bond of association for her defence was signed by the Earls of Argyle, Huntley, Eglinton, CraAvford, Gassilis, Rothes, Montrose, Suther- land, Errol, nine bishops and nine barons, besides many of the most con- siderable gentry. And in a few days an army, to the number of six thousand men, was assembled under her standard. Hume.] [" " The queue [was] a reasonable distance of, and gave the looking on, till she saw howe it [the battle] preceded." Sir W. Drury to Cecil, MS. Cott. Calig. c. I. 67. " On a hill opposite to Langside queen Mary stood during the battle, and witnessed the discomflturo of her friends and the annihilation of her hopes : a hawthorn bush, commonly known by the name of Queen Mary's thorn, long marked out the place, till it decayed through age ; when another was reverentially planted on the same spot to preserve the memory of the scene." Mackie, Castles of Queen Mary, p. 127.] ol8 BISHOr PARKHURST TO R. GUALTER AND H. BULLINGER. [lET. well fortified, but is shortly, as I am told, about to reside in the middle of England. On the loth of July ^ Dr William Turner, a good physician and an excellent man, died at London. Lever preached at his funeral. I have written this single letter, short as it is, to you both ; for I am in doubt whether, in the present confused state of affairs, it will ever reach you. I am therefore unwiUing now to write more. Salute in my name all my friends, especiahy masters Simler, Lavater, Wolfius, Haller, Wickius, WonHchius, Zumghus, &c. Farewell. Li haste. Ludham, August 4, 1568. Yours entirely, John Parkhurst, [Bishop] of Norwich. CXXXVII. BISHOP COX TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 84.] [15G8.] Health in Christ Jesus, my Bullinger, my very dear brother, and a most shining hght in the church of God. I have by me three letters of yours, written last year, the first of which is dated January 6, 1568 ; the second, March 20th, 1568 ; the third, Au- gust 24th, 1568. I have, in addition to these, your books ^ on the " Origin of Error," presented by yourself. For my not having yet replied to your most gratifying and pious letters, I had rather assign no reason at all than a light and futile one. Passing over, then, all excuses, I return sincere thanks to my friend Henry, both because he has so frequently vouchsafed to converse Avitli me by letter, and also for his continuing to obhge me with such pious presents. I do indeed thank God from my heart, that he has set you up as a most solid pillar for the propagation of his truth. I pray that the Lord our God may prolong your life to his glory and the good of his church ; which is now confined and oppressed on every side, and over which the adversaries are meditating and most eagerly anticipating a triumph. But '•' why do the heathen rage ? &c." — (Ps. ii. 1.) We may hope most confidently that God will not desert his people for ever. May the Lord confound the counsels of those Swiss, who with so much animosity deserted you for the French ! The Assyrians raged terribly against Jerusalem, but it was to their great discomfort. If God be for us, who can be against us? Our affairs, thank God, arc hitherto tolerably [1 Sco above, p. 230, note 2.] [2 Sec note 1, p. 284.] CXXXVII.J EISHOP COX TO H. DULLINGEK. 319 quiet, except that the Canaanites are wonderfully thickening among us, daily looking for the time when the ass will speak. Our excellent friend Abel is still alive, but most grievously tor- mented with the stone. There is an abundant crop of pious young men in our universities. The Lord, we hope, will increase the number of the labourers who may be sent into his harvest ; and this ought to be a singular comfort to myseh", who must soon expect my own dismission, when my spirit shall return to heaven, and my body be consigned to the earth. Farewell, my very dear brother, and let us aid each other by our mutual prayers to God. Salute my friend Julius ; he is not quite a stranger to me. 1568. Your most attached, Richard Cox, [Bishop] of Ely. CXXXVIII. C. MONT TO H. BULLINGER. [B. G7.] Dated at Strasburgh, Dec. 27, 1568. I HAVE lately received two letters from you, the one written on the 13th of December, the other on the 16th, brought to me by master Antony Francis, whom both on account of his learning and piety I would wilUngly have obhged, if I had had it in my power. As I could not forward more speedily your treasurer's letter to his son, I have given it in charge to master Antony, who is going to-- morrow from hence to Heidelberg. I can write your excellency no certain news from France ; for all the tidings brought from that country are so vague, that we dare give very little credit to Avhat is told us. We have this one token, that the affairs of the Huguenots arc not yet despaired of, namely, that the king's party, who have at other times put forth vain and inflated exaggerations of any new occurrence in their own favour, are now silent, and have become more moderate. I beheve that the Itahans^, having met, as they deserved, with a warm re- ception, will not rashly make an incursion into France. The cruelty and impious domination of the Spaniards will be retaliated by the avenging arms of the Turks. The bishop of London wrote to me on the 10th of October, which letter I received at length on the 20th of December. For as we are now deprived of the convenience afforded by Flanders in [3 A subsidy of 10,000 ducats was paid by Pius V. to the duke of Savoy, to furnish him with necessary equipments, that he might take the field in France against the Huguenots. Smcdlcy's Hist, of Rof. in France, i. 299.] 520 C. MONT TO H. nULLlXGER. [lET. the transmission of letters, and the German Ocean is now closed against us, we are deprived of the facility both of sending letters and receiving them in return. The bishop in his letter desired me to salute your excellency in his name. I have thought it right to communicate to you, as a friend and well wisher to the affairs of England, the tidings that I have received from thence. The duke of Norfolk, who had till now conducted himself loyally and peace- ably in England, as a nobleman should do, puffed up by extravagant and ambitious expectations, entertained the idea of contracting a most unhappy marriage with the parricide and blood-sucking Medea \ and inflamed with this project withdrew from court to his ancestral domains. On his presumption being discovered, he was summoned to court by a special messenger ; to which summons however he paid no attention, but remained on his paternal estate. The queen, perceiving with her wonted discretion the necessity of putting a stop to such proceedings, sent an officer" of the royal guards with a troop of soldiers to apprehend him ; on hearing of [1 The queen of Scots gave her consent to the marriage, but first desired that queen Elizabeth's consent miglit be obtained : the latter, it appears, first heard of the proposition through some ladies of the court, on which she took the duke to her board at Farnham, and pleasantly gave him •warning to "beware on what pillow he leaned his head." Leicester afterwards more fully revealed the matter to the queen, on her coming to visit him, when he either fell sick, or counterfeited himself so, at Titchfield. The queen sharply reproved Norfolk, and commanded him to desist ; and shortly after- wards, on the representation of Mm-ray, (who first moved this match to the duke, but who wrote to the queen that the duke had propounded it to him,) committed him to the Tower. See Camden's Elizabeth, p. 126, &c. and Whitlocke's Memorials, p. 237, &c. There is a very interesting letter from John Foxe the martyrologist to the duke of Norfolk, to dissuade him from the above-mentioned marriage, in which the writer says : " There is a great rumour with us here in London, and so far spread that it is in every man's mouth almost, of your marriage with the Scottish queue; which rumour as I ti-ust to be false, so would I be sorry that it should be true, for two respects : the one, for the good will I beare to you ; the other for the love I beare to the commonwealthe, for that I see no other, (and many besides me do so no lesse,) but the day of that marriage, whensoever it beginneth, •will end with such a catasti'ophe as will be either ruinous to yourself, or dan- gerous to the tranquillity of the realme, the peace Avhei-eof standing so long amongst us through the great mercy of God, God forbid it should now begin to break by you !" MS. Harl. 416, 154.] [2 Edward Fitzgerald, the earl of Kildare's brother, lieutenant of the band of gentlemen pensioners, met and received the duke of Norfolk at Saint Alban's on his return to court, and conveyed him to Burnham, three miles from Windsor, where the queen then lay. Camden, Elizabeth, p. 131.] CXXXVJIl.] C. MOXT TO II. BULLINGER. 321 which he voluntarily commenced his journey to court, but he was stopped by the queen's order, and not allowed to come near the court. After a delay of three days he was committed to the tower of London, where he is still detained. Two other earls ^ were ordered to confine themselves to their own houses, as being charged with the suspicion of being privy to his design. Now that the duke is arrested, and the others reduced to order, the whole kingdom is quiet and tranquil. Unless that serpent is removed out of the way, she will occasion much mischief by the arts and wiles peculiar to her race, like her who dreamed that she was delivered of a burning torch. Our most serene queen has hitherto peace- ably carried on the government without any bloodshed : may God grant her a continuance of this happiness ! An ambassador was lately sent over from the king of Spain to the most serene queen of England, requesting liberty of passage in his name for three legions or regiments of Flemish infantry, who were on their way to Spain to be employed against the rebel Moors. The queen is reported to have replied on the instant, that it might possibly be attended with danger for such a number of soldiers to sail along the coasts of England ; for as the winds are changeable and uncertain, and many things may happen to persons travelling by sea, different from what they expected, if these soldiers, upon some urgent necessity, should be obliged to bring to in the English ports, the landing of such numbers could not take place without mischief, and it would therefore be necessary for the queen to arm and defend her coasts and harbours with garrison troops : but if the king chose to bear that expense, and give security that he would not make any other use of the German soldiery than against the Moors, she would be ready to oblige him. But it must be considered that faith is not to be kept with heretics, and that, if an oath is to be violated, it may avcU bo violated for the sake of a kingdom ^ Pope Julius used to say that oaths were binding on merchants, but not on princes. We hear no news from Saxony. The prince of Orange is still lingering with the Saxon. The elector himself, it is said, will be [3 The carl of Pembroke was commanded to keep his house, and brought to a private examination. Camden, Eliz. p. 132. The other nobleman was probably the earl of Arundel, who " had earnestly moved [the duke] to marry the Scottish queen," as the earl of Sussex writes to Cecil, Sept. 11, 1569. MS. Cotton. Calig. c. i. 324.] [4 See Cicero, De Off. iii. 21.] 21 322 C. MONT TO H. BULLINGER. [l present at the marriage of his daughter ^ who is to be brought to Heidelberg, where the marriage will take place on the 5th of February. Nothing is yet determined about our sending troops into France. A small force will not be able to penetrate ; a large one will cost too much money, and, to go to any expense and incur danger for the sake of rehgion, is the work of a Sampson. I offer my services to your reverence. Strasburgh, Dec. 27, 1568. Let us pray that through the divine mercy we may meet with better success in the year now approaching. I wish you would omit my English^ titles in the address of your letters. The prudent man, of such possessed, Enjoys them in his silent breast. C. M. % CXXXIX. QUEEN ELIZABETH TO J. STURMIUS. [B. G8.] Westminster, Mai/ I, 15U9. Elizabeth, by the grace of God, of England, France, and Ireland, queen, defender of the faith, &c. to John Sturmius, our right well-beloved friend, greeting. We have received your letter, written to us on the 19th of March, from those parties to whom you gave it to be delivered to us. And to the individuals themselves we have both given the credit that your letter requested, and have accurately considered every thing that they were ordered to acquaint us with. By wliich recognizing your former good will towards us, and that care and solicitude respecting our state, which you have long since mani- fested to us by abundant evidence ; though we were not greatly surprised at it by reason of your ancient attachment to us, yet we rejoiced greatly, and now also return you much thanks. But with respect to the things mentioned by them to us, we have thus determined, that, as we have lately sent over thither with dispatches our faithful servant, Henry Killigrcw^, in whom, together with doctor Mont, our faithful servant, who is well known to you, we wish full confidence to bo placed in respect to all our affairs, you may freely make known to them all the circumstances, and [1 Elizabeth, daughter of Augustus, elector of Saxony, was man-icd in 15G9, to John Casimir, count Palatine.] [2 Christopher Mont was Q. Elizabeth's political agent at Strasburgh.] [3 For an account of this embassy sec Strypc, Ann. i. ii. 2G8.] CXXXIX.] QUEEN ELIZABETH TO J. STURMIUS. S23 communicate them without reserve to either one or both. And ■when we have been made acquainted by them with such your con- ference, we will come to such a determination, by God's blessing, upon the whole matter, as may be worthy of the cause and of ourselves. Farewell. From our palace at Westminster, May 1, in the year of our Lord 1569, and in the eleventh year of our reign. Elizabeth E,. CXL. BISHOP GRINDAL TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 85.] FuLHAM, Aug. 13, 1569. Health in Christ. That I seldom write to your reverence, my very dear master Bullingcr, you must impute to our late wars and interrupted commerce with the Netherlands. I received last year your books "on the Origin of Error," and "on Councils," for which also I return you my best thanks. The dissensions* in our Dutch church at London, about which you wrote to me, are, by the grace of God, at length composed. The judgment of your churches was of very great advantage to us. The duke of Alva^ is clearly acting the part of Phalaris among our Low-Country neighbours. All persons of wealth, of whatever religion, are living in the greatest danger. For men, the rich especially, arc daily dragged to execution, without regard to any form of law. As to the affairs of France, you know them all better than we do. Through the mercy of God we are in great tran- quillity, notwithstanding Alva's threatenings. Our commerce with the Netherlands has been interrupted on this account. Last winter the Spanish^ vessels, which through the medium of the Genoese [1 For an account of these disputes, see Strype, Grindal, 189, &c.] [5 The duke of Alva's first act, after he found himself sole governor of the provinces, in 1568, was to erect a tribunal, so arbitrary in its objects, so inhuman in its proceedings, that the connnon people designated it by the epithet bloody ; and that tribunal might well be called so, which en- abled the duke to boast on his return to Spain, that he had caused tho death of upwards of 18,000 persons by the hands of the executioner. He might have added, that he had been the ruin of 300,000 besides. Burgon, Vol. II. p. 259.] [0 These ships were chased by some of the prince of Conde's ships of war, and took refuge in England. It was thought proper, for better security, to land the money, which was all in Spanish reals, and amounted to 400,000 ducats. The queen was informed by the cardinal do Chatillon, that tho money did not 21—2 324 BISHOP GRINDAL TO II. BULLINCER. [lET. merchants conveyed money to Alva from the pope, were driven by a tempest into our harbours, which are both numerous and safe. The sum, I believe, was 300,000 crowns. This sum, sent as it were from heaven, as all the neighbouring nations are raging with war, our queen, that she might have money ready against every emergency, determined to borrow from the merchants themselves, giving sufficient security for the repayment, at a given time, both of the principal and interest ; a plan which had often been adopted by other sovereigns. When Alva^ heard this, he caused all our merchants now in the Netherlands to be arrested, together with their vessels and their freight. Our government did the same both to the Spaniards and Netherlanders. Our merchants therefore are now compelled to exercise their trade at Hamburgh, a place far less convenient, and this to the great detriment of the whole of the Netherlands. In Scotland, our next neighbour, all affairs are still carried on, as heretofore, under the authority of the youthful king. The ad- ministration (of the government) is in the hands of an excellent man, the Lord James Stuart^, earl of Murray, the king's uncle, to whom the rest of the nobility, who formerly opposed his authority, have at length submitted. Their disagreement was not respecting matters of religion; for each party, even when the dispute was at the highest, professed, as they still continue to do, the doctrine of the gospel. The queen of Scotland, who is still detained here in suffi- belong to the king of Spain, but to some Genoese and Italian merchants, who were afraid the duke (of Alva) would seize it for his own use, as he indeed intended; and the queen, knowing it would be employed against the pro- testants, and the merchants being willing to lend it her, she borrowed it of them, and gave security for its repayment. Alva, incensed at a disappoint- ment which put him under difficulties in the measure he was taking, caused all the English merchants at Antwerp to be arrested ; and he took an inven- tory of their ships and eifects, which he sold afterwards to his own profit. Carte's Hist, of England. See also Burgon's Life of Sir Thomas Gresham, Vol. II. p. 277, &c. and Camden, EHz. p. 120, &c., who states, p. 191, that the money was faithfully repaid in 1573.] [1 The earl of Leicester writes to Randolph, May 1, 1569: "The duke of Alva hath ruffled with us ever since Christmas, and not only cmprisoned our merchants, but also stayed their goods and shippes, whereuppon the queue's majestic hath done the lyke here, and stayed certayne treasure which by force of weather was dryven uppon the west coast. She hathe likewise armed forthe certayne of her shippes to keepe the narrow seas, which have taken dyvers of their hulks and therein greate substance and treasure, all which is surely kept uppon a reckoning till we may see howe matters will fall out betwixt us and them." MS. Lansd. ii. 36.] [2 See p. 309.] CXL.] BISHOP GRINDAL TO H. BULLINGER. 325 ciently honourable and free custody^, will not confirm this regency of Scotland, and thinks herself wronged by it. She is therefore urging [the assistance of] her friends as much as she can ; but unless she is supported by foreign aid, she will not easily recover her kingdom. Thus much have I thought fit to write to you at this time concerning our own affairs and those of our neighbours. Bishops Horn, Parkhurst, Jewel, Cox, Sandys, Pilkington, are all well, and entreated me, whenever I should write to you, to salute your reverence in their name. Greet, I pray you, from me master Kodolph Gualter, and your other brethren in the ministry. Com- mend us to the Lord in your prayers. May the Lord Jesus long preserve you in safety to us and to his church, my very reverend and dear brother in the Lord ! Fulham, on the banks of the Thames, 13th August, 1569. Your most devoted in the Lord, Edm. Grindal, bishop of London. Our brother John Abel, after having been long afflicted with the stone, exchanged this life for a better some months since. CXLI. J. STURMIUS TO QUEEN ELIZABETH, [B. 69.] Strasburgh, SejH. 6, 1569. The individual \ most serene queen, who has translated the holy Bible into Spanish, is one of those, who, oppressed by the calumnies of wicked men, are unable to retain the position in which they seem in a manner to have been placed by God. That serpent, the enemy of all good men, envies England this man and his work, yea, envies the church of C'hi'ist ; and this excellent man has been compelled by the evil artifices of his enemies to depart from England. But he [3 The queen of Scots was removed from Bolton to Tutbuiy Castle in the January of this year, and placed under the care of George Talbot, sixth earl of Shrewsbury. In the month of August she was again removed to Sheffield Castle.] [■* Cassiodorus de Reyna is the person hero mentioned. He was one of the preachers of the Spanish church in England, which he was obliged to leave upon suspicion of some grievous crime. His translation of the Bible was printed at Basle in 1569, and entitled "La Biblia, que es los sacros libros del viejo y nuevo Testamento, transladada en espagnol, 1569." A re- vised edition of it was published by Cyprian de Valera, at Amsterdam, in 1702. Home's Introduction, Vol. ir. p. 268. He also published "A defence of the divinity of Christ against the Jews."] S26 J. STURMIUS TO QUEEN ELIZABETH. [leT. has neither laid aside his zeal for religion, nor his good will towards the kingdom of England, nor his veneration for your majesty ; and he has overcome the power of the devil, and completed a work -which he would willingly have published under the protection of your majesty, if he thought the Spaniards would suffer it without resentment, and if he had considered it worthy of your majesty's patronage : not that he is himself undeserving of the support of the most excellent and powerful, by reason of his virtue and learning, but that he thinks too humbly of himself. He is however desirous that this work and his services should meet with the approval of your majesty, and has requested my recommendation of both ; that, if he may not come into England himself, his bible may at least obtain a place, in which, after having been so long and greatly tossed about with its author, it may at length repose in peace. I commend therefore to your majesty both this man and his labours against the calumnies of the malevolent. They indeed have received their just punishment, and the end of their life sufficiently proved what their course of life had been. But I so intercede for the author, as also to ask pardon for myself, for being so troublesome amidst this vast pressure of business, especially in these disturbances of the world ; believing however, and hoping, that as the prayers and suppHcations of the humble are not unacceptable to God, so they will not be so to great men and the rulers of empires and kingdoms. I pray God to preserve your majesty in health and safety, happiness and prosperity. Strasburgh, Sept. 6, 1569. Your most serene majesty's faithful servant and subject, John Sturmius. CXLII. J. STURMIUS TO SIR W. CECIL. [B. 70.] Sthasburgii, Sept. 8, 1569. I HAVE written to the most serene queen about the Spanish Bible ^, and have commended it to her majesty's protection. But I have need also in this matter of the support of your authority, that if this my vindication should be at all questioned, you may afford us your assistance ; that the calumny of the Spanish papists may not prove of more avail than the desires of the professors of the gospel in those parts. The bible, I hear, is faithfully translated, and I entertain such an opinion of the party who has translated it, that [} See the procedhig lottcr.J CXLII.] J. STUKMIUS TO SIR W. CECIL. 327 I would not hesitate even to swear to his fidelity and innocence. He is certainly endued with an acute and erudite judgment. We only petition her majesty to allow the work to be exposed for sale in your booksellers' shops, should any copies happen to be brought over. You have already dared, and still dare to do greater things than this ; and it is surely the duty of rehgion to provide a habita- tion for the Holy Spirit. We hear nothing in these parts about the French affairs, as all the roads are so entirely blocked up. We have, however, great expectations from you, and also from the conference of our princes at Neuberg. The emperor's commissioners have now been fruitlessly expecting for many weeks the arrival in our city of the envoys of the electors of Saxony and Brandenburgh, and know not how to account for their delay. Farewell, illustrious sir. Strasburgh, Sept. 8, 1569. Your honour's most devoted, John Sturmius. CXLIII. R. HILLES TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 86.] London, Feb. 6, 1570. This, most learned sir, is my letter, whereby you will under- stand, that on the death of our friend, John Abel, your letter of the 14th of March last, together with one from master Rodolph Gualter of the 17th of the same month, both of them being addressed to me in the absence of the aforesaid John Abel, were dehvered into my hands. I therefore opened [the packet] and read the letters, and forwarded them, together with the books which you mention there- in, to the persons to whom you had directed them. I received also a letter from JuUus, of the 16th March, 1569, and some works tied up in separate parcels, addressed to the bishops of Salisbury, Ely, and Worcester, and Sir Antony Cook, together with some little books for each of them ; and which I forwarded with the parcels to the individuals above mentioned. I wish you to be informed of all this ; for your letter dated August 24th has also reached me, and as you seem therein to desire that, both as to forwarding letters from yourself to others, and also conveying them from others to you, I will supply the place of our friend Abel, (who has died in the Lord, and therefore is now, I doubt not, blessed and delivered from those pains which he endured when alive in this world,) I will most readily do this as far as I can. As to the writings which you state, to have been inclosed with the aforesaid letter, as soon as they came 328 R. HILLES TO H. BULLINGKR. [lET. into my hands, I sent them to the reverend the bishops and other learned persons to whom you had directed them. But it pained me much to perceive, from the letter which you sent to John Abel, that although you were not tormented, as he was, with the stone in the bladder, you have nevertheless been afflicted with the same disease in the reins, so that from Martinmass up to the 14th of March you parted with sixty calculi, some of which were of a considerable size. I am glad, however, that although you have been suffering so severely under that kind of disorder, so much patience has been bestowed upon you by divine providence ; and I pray God it may abide with you to the end. Two years since I sent you a letter, of which I derived the chief materials verbatim from one written by a certain individual to master Christopher Mont of Strasburgh, informing him of the state of lower Germany, and especially of Antwerp, a little before the arrival of the duke of Alva. I sent a duphcate [copy] of this letter to the Lent fair at Frankfort in 1568, inclosed in my letter to you, that it might be given in charge to one of the Zurich book- sellers, who would deliver it to you. But as you make no mention whatever of this letter to Christopher Mont in yours of the 24th of August 1569, I rather suspect that it has been lost than that it has reached you, and therefore I inclose a duphcate in this pre- sent letter. But when you state that if a letter to you from hence can by my means be conveyed to master Christopher Mont, it will doubtless reach you, [and] that the reverend bishop of London, Edmund Grindal, if I avail myself of his assistance, can be of great use in forwarding it to the aforesaid Christopher Mont, I am but seldom able to be of much use in matters of this kind. For I was generally accustomed, as long as that route was permitted, to be of use in sending letters, as well to Christopher Mont as to yourself, by way of lower Germany. But now for a whole year I have not sent a single letter to any learned men, either in upper Germany or Switzerland, by way of lower Germany, lest it should be opened in that quarter ; so that I have been necessarily obliged to send my letters to Hamburgh. Wherefore, until this long-pending dispute' between our most serene queen and the king of Spain shall be settled, I am of opinion that both yourself and the aforenamed Christopher Mont will receive very few letters from hence, except at the Frankfort fair. I thank you for acquainting me with the news relating both to yourselves in Switzerland, and on the borders of France on the [^ See note 1, p. 324.] CXLIII.] R. HILLES TO H. BUfXINGER. S29 Swiss side. There is no news in this country which I can relate for certain, except that two earls, those namely of Northumberland and Westmoreland (as I fancy you have heard from hence some days since), whom the queen's majesty ordered, in the month of December last, to appear before her honourable council, ( to clear themselves from a suspicion of a conspiracy premeditated by them against the rehgion and doctrine proved by the holy scriptures, and established by the authority of our most serene queen, at least ten years since,) have raised a rebellion ; and together" with some of the queen's subjects, inhabitants of the bishoprick of Durham, (over which bishop Pilkington presides,) whom they had jointly stirred up to battle, they most impiously took up arms. The rest of the people, how- ever, in other parts of the country, by the great mercy of God, continued in their allegiance, preserved the peace, and lived godly therein under the authority of God and the queen. Those too who dwelt in the neighbourhood of the bishoprick of Durham, rendered their assistance towards the suppression of the rebellion to those noble personages whom the queen had sent for that purpose ^ ; and thus they so pursued those two earls and their whole army, that they themselves, with some cavalry who accompanied them, took refuge in Scotland, where they were forcibly seized* by lord James the [2 In a letter from Sir George Bowes to the earl of Sussex, dated Ber- nard Castle, Nov. 10, 1569, the wi-iter states that "Yesterday at four of the clock in the afternoone, the sayd erles wythe others to the nomber of three hundred horsemen, amied in corsetts, with speres, harquebusses, and daggers, came to Durham." MS. Cott. Calig. b. ix. 331. Stowe says they marched to Durham on the 14th of November, and on Tuesday the 22nd, (which Camden and Whitlocke call the 12th day of their rebellion) they mustered on Cliftbrd Moor to the number of sixteen hundred horsemen, (or six hundred according to Camden and Whitlocke) and four thotisand footmen. A letter from Thomas Stanhope, dated Newark, Dec. 1, (MS. Lansd. Calig. b. ix. 351,) states, on the report of Sir William Bellewes, at York, " that they were not above four tliousande footmen at the moste ; the moste part whereof, rude, unarmed, and ill appointed ; and are eight hundred horsemen, or under a thousand."] [3 Namely, the earl of Sussex, who marched against them with seven thousand men, accompanied with Edward, earl of Rutland, the Lords Hunsdon, Evers, and Willoughby of Parham. The rebels fled to Hexham, and shortly after to Naworth castle : where, hearing that the carl of War- wick and Clinton, lord admiral, pursued them in haste with twelve thousand men from the south parts of England, the two earls with a small company, unknown to the rest, presently withdrew themselves into the neighbouring country of Scotland. See Camden's Elizabeth, p. 135.] [■* Northumberland was delivered by the Grahams into Murray's hands, by whom he Avas confined in the castle of Lochleven. Westmoreland found 330 R. HILLES TO H. BULLINGER. [lET. regent, and a nobleman of the family of Hume. So that I hope they will shortly be brought to England, where I doubt not they will receive the condign punishment that their crimes demand. While the aforesaid persons were in arms prosecuting their impious attempt, they not only threw down the communion tables ^ tore in pieces the holy bible and godly books, and trod under foot the printed homilies, but also again set up the blasphemous mass as a sacrifice for the living and the dead. And as a farther cloke to their pretended piety, they caused some crosses, and some banners of certain saints, whom they either believed to be their patrons and defenders, or pretended they would be, to be carried in procession among their arms. Whereas our friend Rodolph Gualtcr inquired of John Abel to tell him the price of a piece of cloth in England, and how many German ells it contains, you may learn from me that our pieces are of different prices and lengths ; but that the common and coarser ones contain about 28 or 30 Frankfort or Strasburgh ells, and are each worth from eight to ten French crowns ; and the cost of dyeing or tinging with woad will be about two and a half or three French crowns each. Before I had sealed this letter, certain intclHgcnce is brought me that the above-mentioned lord James, regent of Scotland, has been wounded by a gun-shot and killed^ by a certain nobleman of the Hamilton family. Farewell in Christ Jesus, my very reverend sir, and may he evermore preserve you ! Amen. London, Feb. 6, 1569, according to the computation of the church of England. Yours, R. H. a lurkingplacc with Kerr of Fernihurst, and Buccleugh, and at length escaped into the Netherlands, where he led a very poor life, even to his old age, living upon a very slender pension [of £200. a year] from the Spaniard. See Camden as above, and Strype, Annals, i. ii. 344.] [1 The rebels went first to Durham, an episcopal see hard by, where they went and trampled under feet the English Bibles and books of Common Prayer, which they found in the churches. From thence they went small journeys, celebrating mass in all places where they came, trouping together under their colours, (wherein were painted, in some the five wounds of Clu'ist, in others the chalice) ; Richard Norton, an old gentleman, with a reverend gray head, bearing a cross with a streamer before them, as far as Clifford Moor, not far from Wcthcrby. Camden's Elizabeth, p. 134.] [2 In the streets of Linlithgow, (Jan. 23.) See p. 333.] CXLIV.] 15ISH0P GUINDAL TO H. BULLINGER. 331 C'XLIV. BISHOP GRINDAL TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 87.] London, Feh. 18, 1570. My very dear and honoured brother, master BulUnger, I have received your letter, dated August 24th. I had received also in the course of last year your book on the " Origin of Error," and '•'on Councils," as I wrote to you more fully in my letter sent to the autumn fair at Frankfort, and which I hope you received some months since. We cannot now send our letters except by way of Hamburgh, to one or the other of the Frankfort fairs, by reason of the road being closed against us by the duke of Alva. Had not this been the case, nothing would have been more dehghtful to me than to have conversed with you by letter more frequently. I most sincerely congratulate you on your recovery from your sickness of last summer, and greatly desire to hear that your health is entirely re-established. Should you be able to regain a tolerable degree of strength in the summer succeeding the disorder, we shall, it seems, have reason to hope for a yet longer enjoyment of you : for the disease of itself very often acts as a medicine, or rather as a cure. Our affairs, through the mercy of God, are now tolerably quiet, though they have of late been very unsettled. An attempt^ was made, last summer, to marry the queen of Scotland to Thomas Howard, duke of Norfolk ; but our queen, offended at the proposal, committed the above-named nobleman, on the 11th of September, to the tower of London, where he now remains a prisoner. At the beginning of November two carls, namely those of Northumberland and Westmoreland, collected troops and raised a rebelhon in the counties of York and Durham, for the purpose of restoring the catholic religion, falsely so called*. Their army consisted of twelve hundred cavalry and four thousand infantry. They supposed that at the name of the Mass vast multitudes would come over to them ; besides which they expected assistance from the duke of Alva; for they had determined upon releasing the queen of Scotland from her confinement : but their expectations were alto- gether disappointed. For the queen of Scotland, on the discovery of the plot, was transferred to the city of Coventry^, in the very [3 Seo above, Letter CXXXVIII. p. 320, n. 1.] [4 Seo note 2, p. 329, and below. Letter CLV. note 1, for a summary account of this rebellion.] P The quccu returned to Tutbury Castle in January, 1570. Haynes, p, 526.] S32 BISHOP GRINDAL TO H. BULLINGER. [leT. heart of the kingdom : her friends at home were prevented from acting, partly by the severity of the winter, and partly by the passes being prc-occupied : armed vessels were also sent out to pre- vent any foreign aid. The queen then collected an army of twenty- four thousand men, consisting both of cavalry and infantry, and which the rebel army had not the courage to resist. So that on the 16th of December the rebels disbanded their infantry ; the cavalry, however, fled to the borders of Scotland, where the greater part surrendered, and the remainder consulted their safety by flight. The two earls themselves fled into Scotland with a hundred chosen troops. But Northumberland^ was taken prisoner by the regent of Scotland, where he still remains in confinement. Westmoreland", however, who is a young man, and with the spirit of a Catiline, is living among freebooters in the wilds of Scotland. Thus was this rebellion suppressed within forty days, and without bloodshed, except that five hundred of the rebels were afterwards executed, and many are still kept in prison awaiting a like punishment^. The rebel army had on their colours the five wounds, as they are called, and the repre- sentation of a cross with this inscription. In hoc signo vinces. They performed their masses in every church ; the bibles moreover, translated into our language, which are found in all our churches, they either tore in pieces, or committed to the flames. They ran- sacked the property of the bishop of Durham, and that of all the pastors and ministers ; but they put no one to death. Pilkington, the bishop of Durham, (God having so ordered it) was at that time staying in London for the recovery* of his health : he would other- \} The earl of Northumberland was delivered by Morton for a sum of money to the English, and conveyed to York, whei*e he was condemned of high treason, and executed on Aug. 22, 1572. Sir Thomas Gargrave, who was president of the council of the North, writes to lord Burghley from York, on the day after his execution, that " he contynued obstynate in religion, and declared he would die a catholicke of the pope's churche. He accompted his offences nothing, and especially after he heard he should die ; but before he seemed to confesse he had offended, and would greve lyke it, saying, he dyd that he dyd by compulsion and for fear of his lyfe." MS. Cott. Calig. c. III. 381. Saunders says that the earl " suffered martyrdom."] [2 He afterwards escaped into Flanders, where he got a pension of £200. a year from the king of Spain. See note 4, p. 329.] [3 See p. 330.] [■* Pilkington thus wrote to Cecil on the 4th of January: "According to your honor's appointment I have sent my man to know by your gudd meanes the quene's majestie's pleasure for my repairing homeways." After de- scribing the state of the country, he adds, " but God is present ever with his people, and his vocation is not rashly to be forsaken, nor his assistance to be CXLIV.] BISHOP GR1NDA.L TO H. BIJLLIXGER. 8o3 wise have been without doubt in great danger of his hfe. As soon as our disturbances were suppressed, we received most sad news from Scotland respecting the death of the most excellent and pious prince, James Stuart, regent of Scotland ; who Avas shot through the lower part of the belly by a musket-ball on the 23rd of January, and died two days after. As the regent was riding on that day (for thus the murder was committed) in a street of the town of Linlithgow, surrounded by his nobles, as usual, a certain traitor, of the Hamilton^ family, aimed a gun at him from a window, and shot him. The assassin mounted a fleet*^ horse, which he had ready saddled at the back door of the house^ and took refuge in a cer- tain castle^. It is to be feared that great changes will take place in consequence of the death of this illustrious personage : we hear, however, that the nobility and council of Scotland, who have embraced the gospel, have unanimously and resolutely determined to take upon dowted on. His gudd will be done ! " MS. Lansd. xn. 29. Another inter- esting letter from the bishop to Cecil in 1573 is given by Strype, wherein he desires the queen's leave to come up to London that winter, being by reason of his age very much pinched by the winter's cold in that northern part of the nation. " There is," he said, " a highway to heaven out of all countries ; of which free passage, I praise God, I doubt not."' Strype, Annals, ii. i. 437.] [5 James Hamilton of Bothwellhaugh, who had been taken at Langside, and condemned to death, had made his escape out of prison, and his estate was forfeited. His wife, heiress of Woodhouslie, still expected she might enjoy her own in quiet ; but Murray, giving it away to one of his favourites, sent officers to take possession of her house, who turned her out into the fields, and treated her with such inhumanity, that she became raving mad. From that moment her husband resolved to revenge himself by the murder of the regent. See Carte's History of England, and Robertson's History of Scotland, who says that Hamilton owed his life to the regent's cle- mency.] [6 In a letter from lord Hunsdon to lord Burghley, dated Berwick, Aug, 24, 1575, the writer says : " The regent's dealings in many thyngs are greatly mislyked withall by the most part of the nobylytie of his owne faction, but chiefely for one matter, whych is, for that ho bathe of late, (as it is credibly reported, and I thynk is very trew,) taken a secret submission of the lorde of Arbrothe, by delivering to the regent hys sworde with the hylt forwarde, the poynt in his hande, being knowne to be the pryncipall procurer of the kylling of th' erlo of Murrey ; for the harquebuss that kyld him was hys, the horse the murderer fled upon was hys, and he receivyd hym into Hambelton, and sent hym into France." MS. Cott. Calig. c. v. 37. This enterprise thus appears to have been connected with the same plots as had produced the rebellion of the two northern earls. Sec Wright's Queen Elizabeth and her Times. Vol. I. p. 358, note.] 334 mSHOP GRIND AL TO II. BULLINGER. [lET. themselves the defence of rehgion and the commonwealth. We are in daily expectation of more certain inteUigence. We have lately- had news from Spain, that the Moors, or Moriscoes, have defeated the royal army with great slaughter, and taken the camp. Alva has a fleet in readiness, but its destination is unknown. Some think that he is about to send aid to Spain ; others suspect that he Avill land an army in Scotland ; nor are there wanting those who imagine that he is meditating some attempt against ourselves. We are therefore sending out a fleet thoroughly prepared for any thing that may happen, to observe his movements. I am writing this account both of ourselves and our neighbours more fully, that I may in some measure make amends for my long silence. The bishops of Winchester, Norwich, Durham, and Sahs- bury, are all in good health, as are also Humphrey, Sampson, and Foxe. I communicated your letter yesterday to Sampson and Foxe, who respectfully salute you in return. Salute your colleagues in my name. Commend, I entreat you, me and my ministry to the Lord in your prayers. I pray our heavenly Father to give his choicest blessing to you all, and to your labours which you daily undergo. May the Lord Jesus long preserve your piety safe both to us and to his church ! London, Feb. 18, 1569. Your most devoted in the Lord, Edm. London. CXLV. BISHOP COX TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 88.] Er.y, Juhj 10, 1570. I RETURN your salutation from my heart, my beloved brother in Christ. Your letter dated on the 2nd of March last did not reach me till the 22nd of June. This is usually the case, either from the great distance between us, or from the carelessness of the couriers. I read it however, when it came, with attention and pleasure, because it announced to me that you were in the enjoy- ment of tolerable health, notwithstanding you are so advanced in years ^, and worn out by numerous labours, and weakened by [former] illness. I wilhngly took up your books both upon Daniel and on Isaiah, (in which I occupy myself from time to time, and not without a holy delight,) and return you many thanks for them ; and all who have any regard for religion acknowledge themselves much indebted to you for the same. Your German discourses, as soon as they reach me, I will endeavour to make out either by [1 BuUinger was now in the sixty-sixth year of his age.] CXLV.] BISHOP COX TO H. BULLINGER, 335 myself or with the assistance of others. But now, my Henry, since the Lord has for so many years past employed you as his instrument to the great advantage of his church, you must persevere in the defence of the church of Christ, as far as your age will allow you, even to the end of your life. Many of the heads of antichrist yet remain to be cut off, which from time to time occasion us much trouble. I wish you would in earnest use your endeavours for their extirpation. Antichrist, relying on the authority of his church and councils, contends that faith is not to be kept with heretics, that is, with those whom he judges to be such. Then ho arrogates to himself the authority of recalling, and withdrawing, and absolving subjects from their fidelity and obedience to their princes and magistrates, and commands foreign powers to invade, desolate, and destroy godly magistrates, and deprive them of every right of government. This has been fully confirmed during the last month by a popish" bull introduced by stealth into this country. Lastly, there are among us some papists, and those not of the lowest rank, who strain every nerve that they may be permitted to live according to their consciences, and that no account of his rehgion be demanded from any one. Meanwhile many iniquitous practices take place in secret, and by the bad example they afford are a stumblingblock to the godly. If you will turn your attention to these three points you will do a very acceptable service to Christ and his church. The schism about the habits of the clergy is still increasing, I grieve to say, among men of a purer character. May God at length grant that wc may all of us think the same things ! The Lord Jesus preserve you and yours, with your illustrious state ! Let us rejoice in the Lord, and aid each other by our mutual prayers. From my Tusculum at Ely, 10 July, 1570. Your brother in Christ, Rich. Cox, [bishop] of Ely. [2 This year Pius V. caused a bull to be publicly set up in Lonilon against the queen ; which was daringly done by one Felton, upon the bishop of London's palace. Stryj^c, Annals, i. ii. 354. The bull is given at length by Camden, EUz. p. 14G, and was printed with observations and animadvei-- sions upon it in English. Sec also Cardwell's Documentary Annals, i. 328- 331, and Collier's Ecclesiastical History, vi. 471-474.] o36 BISHOP PILKINGTON TO H. BULLINGKU. [lET. CXLVI. BISHOP PILKINGTON TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 89.] July 17, 1570. Your letter, my reverend father in Christ Jesus, dated on the 2nd of March, and rebuking me for not having written to you of so long a time, I received on the 29th of June. Go on then as you have begun ; instigate me, rouse me up, and at length you will at least extort something. " Better are the wounds of a friend, &c." [Prov. xxvii. 6.] I am a dilatory and unfrequent correspondent ; but I have not cast off all shame, nor has my remembrance of you become so cold, but that I can truly say of your happy Zurich what the psalmist speaks concerning Jerusalem : " If I do not re- member thee, Jerusalem, above my chief joy, let my right hand forget her cunning." [Psal. cxxxvii. 6, &c.] Your prudence has heard, although but lately, as you tell me, concerning those disturbances which have so sharply and suddenly burst upon us ; and likewise, how happily they have been quelled, — I wish I could say entirely extinguished. I informed you in my last letter that the queen of Scots had fled over to us, and I compared our situation with that of the people of Laish^ I feared lest that should happen to us which occurred to them ; and my fears have been realized. The earls of Northumberland and Westmoreland, between whom I reside, having planned a rebellion, roused us from our slumbers, and as long as they could, persecuted us with the greatest harshness. They offered all manner of violence to rehgion and all its ministers. But the Lord has delivered us all from the mouths of the lions, uninjured indeed in our persons, although stripped of all our fortunes and plundered of our property. You perhaps wonder how this has happened. The world cannot bear two suns ; much less can the kingdom endure two queens or two religions. Our Louvaine friends obtained bulls from the pope, that they might absolve the people from the allegiance due to the queen's majesty ; those who would no longer attend our church and liturgy were to be reconciled to their syna- gogue, and those who would submit themselves to them were to obtain pardon of all their sins, without even purgatory. These impieties are so deeply settled in the minds of many, that I am in doubt whether they will ever be eradicated. Some persons are detained in prison for these things ; many have absconded ; but the greater number are lying in concealment, eagerly expecting an occasion of fresh disturbances. Some of the nobility joined thcm- [' Judg. xviii.] CXLVI.] BISHOP PlLKINGTOxN TO H. 15ULL1NGER. S37 selves to them : but our good Lord disappointed all of them of their hope, and hath preserved our Elizabeth to us, and long will preserve her, as all good men both hope and desire. Northumber- land, having fled into Scotland, is there kept in prison, with some others of the same faction ; Westmoreland^ is wandering about in exile in the same country with a few others like himself. Others, convicted by their own consciences, have sought refuge in Flanders, with a view of obtaining assistance. But the Lord will not be wanting to his people. James, tthe guardian of the king of Scotland, and regent of the kingdom, has been murdered by the treachery of a certain Scotsman whom he had saved from execution. This is a great grief to many good persons ; for he was a good man towards all, and one who feared God. The better part of the Scots side with our queen ; the rest we are pursuing with fire and sword. I am, by the blessing of God, restored to my flock ^; and though the minds of all are not so settled as I could wish, there is, notwithstanding, both here and in Scotland quite liberty enough both for the administration of the laws and for rehgion. The Lord will give [us] yet better things [in answer] to your prayers. The bishop of London is now made archbishop of York, and my neighbour ; at which I rejoice exceedingly. Thomas Lever, as soon as he comes to London, will make a collection in behalf of our good landlady, and will send it over. I should noAv send it myself, if I knew in what way it could be forwarded ; but since our good friend Abel, who was our general messenger, has been so long dead, I do not even know how this letter will reach you. Farewell, my master, with all your fellow- ministers. Prosperity to Zurich ! July 17, 1570. Yours in Christ, James Pilkington. CXLVII. ARCHBISHOP GRINDAL TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 90.] LoNDOK, July 31, 1570. Health in Christ. I have received your discourses written in German, for wliich I thank you. I am still sufiiciently conversant [2 "The lord regent had lyked to have gotten betrayed the earle of Westmoreland, at a place called Blood-lanes ; it is the lord of Fernyhurst's ; but he got knowledge, and so escaped that end." Allayn King to Su- Henry- Percy. MS. Cott. Calig. b. ix. 400.] [3 The bishop, it seems, had been required by the queen to return to his diocese, from which he had been absent in London during the rebellion. Sec above, note 4, p. .332.] '338 ARCHBISHOP GRINDAL TO H, BULLINGER. [lET. with German writing, for I laboured hard to learn your language ; but I have lost the habit of conversing in it. I transmitted the pension of Julius Santerentianus to Richard Hilles a month ago, that he might take care it should be paid to Froschover at the next Frankfort fair. I hope you received the letter which I sent at the last spring fair. Since then it has seemed good to our most gracious queen to translate^ me from this city to the see of York, where things are not yet properly settled". In the counties of York and Durham there arose, as I lately wrote you word, last winter a rebelhon of the nobles and the peasantry for the purpose of restoring the papacy. Notwithstanding many executions^ took place, I am informed that the feeHngs of the people are much exasperated, and panting for renewed disturb- ances. What therefore may await me there, I cannot tell. But if new tumults should arise in that quarter, it is impossible but that both myself and my very dear brother Pilkington, the bishop of Durham, must be in the greatest danger. But these things do not move me ; the will of the Lord be done ! However, I tell you of them, that you may commend both us and our ministry more earn- estly to the Lord in your prayers. When I was writing the above, I was almost on the point of setting off on my journey to York, so that I could not at this time write to you more at length. Our affairs, through the mercy of God, are tolerably quiet. Our army* entered Scotland at the [1 He was translated May 1st, 1570, and installed by proxy June the 9th. Strype, Grindal, 239.] [2 Archbishop Parker told Secretary Cecil, that my lord of London would be very fit for York, " who were, as he styled them, a heady and stout people : witty, but yet able to be dealt with by good governance, as long as laws could be executed, and men backed." Strype, Grindal, 234.] [3 Three-score and six petty constables and others were hanged for a terrour at Durham, among whom the man of most note was one Plumtree, a priest. At York were executed Simon Digby, J. Fulthorp, Thomas Bishop, Robert Peneman; and at London, some few months after, Chi-isto- pher and Thomas Norton ; and some others elsewhere. Camden's EUzabeth, p. 135.] [4 In the midst of April, Sussex, with the lord Hunsdon, Drury marshal of Berwick, and an English army, entered into Scotland, fired the towns and villages of Buccleugh and the Kerrs all over Teviotdale, spoiled their fields, and demolished Fernihm-st and Craling, two castles of Thomas Koit's. On the other side, Henry lord Scroop entered at the very same time into the west March of Scotland, and wasted fiir and wide all over Annandale the territories of Johnston and others which had harboured the English rebels. At this time were burnt 300 villages, and about 50 castles razed. Camden, Eliz. p. 141. See also Strype, Annals, i. ii. 358.] CXLVII.] ARCHBISHOP GRINDAL TO H. BULLINGER. 339 beginning of last May, under the command of the Earl of Sussex, with the view of reducing the rebels and those who harboured them in Scotland. Our troops destroyed within a few days fifty castles in Scotland by means of gunpowder, and burned three hundred villages without any resistance. Scotland is now sufficiently tran- quil. But this is probably owing to our queen, who is keeping an army on the borders ; for otherwise the party of the queen of Scotland, who is still in our custody, seem as if they would be plotting some new disturbance. The king's party now prevail, and have chosen the Earl of Lenox, grandfather of the young king, to be regent. He has taken upon himself the defence of religion and of the king. York is 160 of our miles distant from this city. I shall not, therefore, be able to send letters to you so conveniently as I have been used to do. I will write, however, from time to time, even though you should be longer in receiving them ; and I shall anxiously expect to hear from you. May the Lord Jesus preserve your piety in safety to me and to his church, my very reverend and dear brother in the Lord ! London, July 31, 1570. Yom's in Christ, Edmund Ebor. Greet, I pray you, your colleagues in my name, and especially master Rodolph Gualter. CXLVIII. BISHOP JEWEL TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 9].] Aug. 7, 1570. Much health in Christ. Your letter, my much esteemed father and master in Christ, was most gratifying to me, both as commg from you to whom alone I owe every thing, and also as seeming somewhat angry and complaining, and claiming from me the per- formance of my duty [of writing.] I confess my fault, and beg for pardon ; for it is much better to do this, than to stand upon one's defence, though I doubt not of my bemg able to defend myself, even before the most severe judge. For in the first place, I am at a great distance from London : in the next place, John Abel, the mutual agent of our correspondence, has departed this life : lastly, the disorders in the Low Countries have for some years thrown so many obstacles in the way of travelling, that neither our merchants can pass over to Antwerp, nor the Antwerp merchants to us. And then, our letters are often left on the road, often carried to other places, often come back, and are often lost. And what is to become of the one I am now Avriting, it is impossible to '^9. 340 BISHOP JEWEL TO H. BULLINGER. [lET. tell. This reason certainly makes nie write to you both less fre- quently, and more sparingly and cautiously, than I could wish. I rejoice, however, that your affairs are in the condition you mention. May God send you help from his holy place, and aid you out of Sion ! For there are enemies gaping upon you at this time, not less numerous or ferocious than upon ourselves. For antichrist seems now to have ventured his last cast, and to have thrown the world into confusion by seditions, tumults, wars, fury, fire and flame. He perceives that it is now all over with him, and that destruction and death are impending over him and his party ; so that his wretched object now is, not to perish ignobly or ob- scurely. Let the remembrance of them perish then with a noise. That vague rumour which was generally reported among you, respecting a change in our circumstances, was altogether unfounded. For both our queen, by the blessing of our good and gracious God, still holds the government, and religion is in the same state as here- tofore, and as we wish it to be. Our papists, however, by the persuasion and influence of pope Pius, have endeavoured to regain their power. But blessed be our God, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, that while they seek to destroy others, they perish themselves. Two of our nobility^ indeed, young and foohsh and dissolute, who cared more for dice than for religion, raised, towards the end of last autumn, some thousands of peasantry in the re- motest parts of England. And relying on their numbers, these silly men were bold enough to publish a proclamation^, to the effect that they intended to remove some persons, I know not whom, (for they mentioned no names,) from the sacred council of the queen, and to restore the old religion. AVhat more ? Without delay altars are erected in their camp ; the holy bibles are committed to the flames^, and masses are performed. After some weeks the earl of [1 The earls of Northumberland and Westmoreland, see p. 329, and note 1, Letter CLV. This rising gave occasion to the Homily against wilful re- bellion. Strypo, Annals, i. ii. 322.] [2 The two earls set forth a writing, wherein they declared, that they had not taken arms with any other intent, than that the religion of their fore- fathers might be restored, corrupt councillors removed from the queen ; the duke, and other faithful lords, that were put from their rank and degree, restored to liberty and grace ; and that they attemjited nothing against the queen, to whom they owned themselves now and ever to be dutiful and faith- ful subjects. Camden's Eliz. p. 134. See also a letter from Sir G. Bowes to the earl of Sussex, in Wright's Elizabeth and her Times, vol. i. p. 333, from the MS. Cott. Calig. b. ix. 351.] [^ Sec p. 332.] CXLVIII.] BISHOP JEWEL TO H. BULLINGER. 341 Sussex, a good and active man, and of great discretion, was sent against them at the head of a handful of troops. They began gradually to disperse and retreat, while Sussex was skilfully and resolutely pursuing them, and pressing upon their rear. At last the wretches, when they perceived the enemy hanging over them, being utterly unskilled in action, and men who had never seen an enemy before, were afraid of trying the fortune of war ; and struck with the consciousness of their crime, mad and blind, they leave the army without a leader, and quitting the camp secretly by night, with only a few adherents, take refuge in Scotland. Here then you have the history of our affairs, which I cannot even call to mind without a blush ; for I am ashamed that men of such igno- rance and folly should have been found in England. Our queen demands through her ambassador the rebels from Scotland, where there are at this time two parties ; one of which cherish the pure religion and the gospel, and depend upon us ; the other are enemies to godhness, and friendly to popery, and are inclined towards the French. The leader of these is the duke of Hamilton, a man, they say, much more influential in name than in counsel. The states are assembled, the deliberation is begun, our party are of opinion that the rebels should be given up ; the Hamilton party maintain the contrary, and at length are successful. Our people, impatient of the offence, arm troops and march into the very midst of Scotland without any opposition, and lay waste, after an enemy's fashion, the castles and towns belonging to the duke of Hamilton. But those notable enemies of ours above mentioned, when they could no longer keep themselves in Scotland, fled over into Flanders, where they are now remaining with the duke of Alva, and are making all the distm^bance in their power. The most holy father has occasioned us all these disorders. For in his holiness and wisdom he secretly sent to his friends in England a bull (shall I call it a golden or a leaden one?) of great importance. It was for some months carried about in obscurity and confined to a few. The good father declared that Ehzabeth was' not queen of England, for that her institutions did not please him ; and he therefore ordered that none should acknowledo-e her as queen, or obey her in that character. Whosoever should act otherwise, he devoted to all the furies, and delivered to destruction. holy see ! Thus it was, forsooth, that Peter used to act of old ! There were some, however, to whom on other accomits these decrees seemfed holy ; others wore not so flexible to every nod of the pope, and had not so learned the gospel. I send you a copy 342 BISHOP JEWEL TO H. BULLINGER. [lET. of tliis most offensive and empty bull, that you may understand with what solemn impudence the beast is now raging. Within these few days new disorders have arisen in Norfolk \ But their authors were forthwith apprehended at the very outset, and thrown into prison. The queen of Scots, an exile from her country, is, as you know, here in custody ; with sufficient honour indeed, yet so as that she cannot raise any disturbances. This is she to whom pope Pius not only freely promises Scotland, but England likewise; for he hopes that a woman, a catholic, a murderer of her husband, and an adulteress, will have great influence in the restoration of popery ! "We are preparing a fleet, and have troops in readiness. Our church in other respects, by the blessing of God, is quiet. Dr Grin- dal is made archbishop of York, and Dr Sandys, who was heretofore bishop of Worcester, is now translated to London. Parkhurst, [bishop] of Norwich, is ahve and well ; but I have not seen him these six years. May God preserve you very long for the advance- ment of his gospel and of his church ! Salute in my name masters Gualter, Simler, Lavater, Zuinghus, Wickius, Haller, and your Bullingers, whom I love in the Lord. On my journey : for I am now visiting my diocese. Aug. 7, 1570. Yours in Chi'ist, Jo. Jewel, bishop of Salisbury. CXLIX. BISHOP PARKHURST TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 93.] Norwich, Jan. 16, 1571. Hail, my Bullinger. The death of Abel, to whom alone I was accustomed to entrust my letters, and whatever other things I had to send, has been the reason of my writing to you less fre- quently. For he was a most faithful friend, and I cannot tell where I shall be able to find such another. But the Lord, I trust, will raise me up one like him, and who may in future supply his place. Norwich is nearly a hundred miles from London, which I \} The object of this rebellion was, to set the queen of Scots at liberty ; to rescue the duke of Norfolk, who was a prisoner for listening to a match with that queen ; likewise to seize the persons of the lord keeper, the earl of Leicester, and secretary Cecil, persons near about the queen, and to make insults upon the poor protestant strangers, and drive them out of the land ; and finally to bring in the duke of Alva from Flanders to invade England. Four were condemned for high treason, and two more to perpetual imprison- ment. Strj'pe, Annals, i. ii. 364.] CXLIX,] BJSHOP PARKHURST TO H. BULLINGER. 343 am not in the habit of visiting, unless when summoned to parlia- ment, which will be the case this winter. I must there seek out some trustworthy person, who will undertake that my letters shall be safely delivered to you. Our merchants are not over fond of going either to Flanders or Spain. For they fear the Spanish in- quisition more than that of the devil, which neither spares its own subjects nor strangers. Grindal, late bishop of London, is made archbishop of York. Sandys, bishop of Worcester, is translated to London. About the beginning of November great inundations of the sea occasioned extensive mischief in many parts of England ; nor did my diocese escape with impunity in Norfolk and Suffolk. Flanders was injured more than any other country. The ground here has been for some weeks buried in deep snow, such as I never saw before, and still continues to be so. There is not a spot of green any where. A murrain is apprehended among the cattle through want of food. My wife has been ill from the beginning of November to the present time, and is not yet recovered. Should I be able to ascer- tain that this letter of mine has reached you in safety, I will endeavour to write more frequently. But the death of Abel, the disturbances in Belgium, and spies in every quarter, have hitherto retarded in great measure every attempt. I wish all happiness to your chief magistrates, the council, the ministers of the word, the citizens, and the whole state of Zurich. Farewell all of you in the Lord ! And I bid you again farewell, most agreeable BuUinger. My invaUd salutes you all. In haste. Norwich, Jan. 16, 1571. Yours from my heart, John Parkhurst, N. CL. BISHOP JEWEL TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 95.] Salisbury, March 2, 157L Much health in Christ. I Avrotc to you, most accomplished sir, and much esteemed father in Christ, towards the beginning of September, and at some length, concerning the general posture of our affairs. I know not what has become of that letter ; for it often happens in these turbulent times that our poor innocent letters arc cither destroyed or lost on the road. Should I hear that it has reached you in safety, I shall be more encouraged to write in future. 344 BISHOP JEWEL TO H. fiULLINGER. [lET. Our churches are now, by the blessing of God, in peace. The most holy father has endeavoured to create confusion by every means in his power. He sent over to us by stealth his most senseless bull, by which he would deprive queen Elizabeth of the government of the state, and Christ of his kingdom. I sent a copy of it to you at the last fair, that you might know with what solemnity that old and foolish man is raving. All his secret counsels have been so ably detected, and skilfully and opportunely counter- acted by those who hold the helm of government, that they are now perceived even by children. Those wretched and infatuated rebels, who, eighteen months since, began to raise disorders in the county of Durham, are now utterly defeated, and exiles in Flanders. Our friends at Louvaine have not written any thing for two years. The queen of Scotland is still kept here, as you are aware, in a free custody, honourably, and with almost a royal attendance ; but still she is in custody, wliicli she bears with impatience and indig- nation, and complains that she is unjustly dealt with. You well know the spirit and disposition of the Guises. They say that the brother of the kms; of France is courtins; her for his wife. The affairs of Scotland, meanwhile, are under the direction of those who profess the gospel. That intercourse, which formerly existed between us and the people of Antwerp, having been violated some years since by their injustice and breach of faith, cannot as yet be renewed. In Spain the Moors are increasing in number, strength, and victories ; Philip is growing weaker every day. But what can I tell you about the affairs of Cyprus * and Venice ? The Turk, they say, is now hovering upon Italy. He will at least bridle the ferocity of antichrist ; for the sovereigns of Christendom, though so often warned, pay no attention. Our queen Ehzabeth hath sum- moned the peers, and proclaimed a parliament'^ for the 2nd of April, which I hope will be for the prosperity and welfare both of [1 In a letter to the countess of Shrewsbury, dated London, Aug. 31, 1570, the unknown writer says : " It is MTitten, by letters of the 2Sth of the last, from Venice, that the Turke hath landed in Ciprus a hundred thousand men or moo; and hathe besieged the two great cities within that kingdome, Nicosia and Famagosta .... The Turke hath sent another army by land against the Venetians, into Dallmatia, and are besieging of Zora with 20,000 footmen and 20,000 horsemen; .... and it is written that the Turke's severall armies be above 200,000 men against the Venetians .... A man may see what accompte is to be made of these worldly thinges, as to see in a small tjTne the thirde state of Christendome in security, power, and welthe, to be in danger of utter overthrowe in one yere." Shrewsbury Papers, Lodge.] [2 For the proceedings "of this Parliament, see Strype, Aimals, n. i. 90.] CL.] BISHOP JEWEL TO H, BULLINGER. 815 church and state. There, at length, I hope to see our friend Park- hurst, whom I have not seen of seven whole years. Walter Haddon\ a pious and eloquent man, has departed this life. Grindal [archbishop] of York, Sandys [bishop] of London, Horn of Winchester, are a great way from me, each on his watch- tower. All of them, however, desire your welfare, and send their respects. I owe my friend Julius forty French cro^vns, being his pension for the two past years. I have desired him by letter once or twice to let me know to whom he wishes me to pay them. The money is forthcoming, as soon as there is any one to receive it. If he does not choose to write, he must not accuse me of not keeping my promise, for it is altogether his own fault. Farewell, my father, and much-esteemed master in Christ. May the Lord Jesus very long preserve you in safety to his church ! Salisbury, March 2, 1571. Yours in Christ, John Jewel, bishop of Salisbury. CLI. R. HILLES TO H. BULLINGER. [B. 73.] London, March 8, 1571. Much health in the Lord. As my son Barnabas Hilles, my much honoured friend and master, has informed our beloved bro- ther in Christ, JuHus Sancterentianus, by letter dated on the 26th of last November ; I have received your letter, written on the 27th of August last, here in London from the learned and pious youth Henry Butler, whom, a fortnight after I had received the letter aforesaid, I sent on horseback with trusty attendants to a certain Dunstan Felton, son of master John Butler deceased, to an English village named Chilton'*, in the county of Suffolk: from which place I have received a letter from the aforesaid Henry Butler, written from the house of his aunt, a widow, and a very godly matron. I will also most diligently and heartily undertake the manage- p Walter Haddon was esteemed one of the most learned and religious men of these times. He was master of requests to queen Elizabeth, and employed by her in many foreign embassies. Of him it was that, when asked whether she preferred him or Buchanan for learning, she replied, Buchananum omnibus antepono, Haddonum nemini postpono. See Strype, Parker, ii. 145. Bm-gon's Life of Sir Thomas Gresham, ii. G7.] [4 There are two places of this name in Suffolk ; the one, a hamlet in the parish of Clare, the other a small village near Sudburv. ] 346 R. HILLES TO H. BULLINGEK. [lET. ment of all that business whicli in your aforesaid letter you desired me to execute. But I forwarded to the aforesaid Henry Butler on the 26th of November, by a trusty messenger, some letters which master Christopher Froschover dehvered to my aforesaid son Bar- nabas at Frankfort. My son Barnabas Hilles has also received from the aforesaid master Froschover, together -with the aforesaid letters, four books in the German language, which he took care should be faithfully delivered to the parties to whom they were addressed ; and I and my wife are exceedingly obliged to you for having sent us two of those books as a present. I am very sorry that, when you "wrote me the aforesaid letter, you had not yet fully recovered from your illness. I hope however that before this time you are much better : God grant it may be so ! I have not lately received any letters to be forwarded to you from any of our bishops or others residing here in England. Should I however receive any letters for that purpose at any future time, I will take care that they shall be sent over to you with all diligence, ]\Iaster Edmund Grindal, who now, as you may have heard, is archbishop of York, is constantly resident, as I am told, near York, or in the city itself. But I think that he will shortly come hither to London, as will almost all the other bishops ; for by the queen's majesty's command the famous council of all England, whicli among us is commonly called a parliament, is sum- moned to assemble. With you, if I remember rightly, such assembHes are called comitia imperialia in Latin, and in German, Reichstag. Master Edwin Sandys, who was lately bishop of Wor- cester, is now our bishop of London ; but ho is not much known to me, except by sight : and indeed almost all the other bishops, with the exception of that most learned and amiable, yea rather divine bishop, master Jewel of Salisbury, are for the most part unknown to me. For I am afraid, (although I have never experienced it myself,) that some of them (as the most learned Jerome Avrote con- cerning some bishops of his time), placed as it were upon some liigh beacon, scarce deign to look upon mankind, or hold any intercourse with their fellow-servants. Your friend master Cox, bishop of Ely, who married a year ago the young widow of master Doctor Turner \ a physician, is still living, and, by God's blessing, in good health. But his predecessor master Thirlby^ who was bishop of [1 Sec Strypo, Cranmcr, i. 394. Parker, i. 93, 301. Sec also Letter CVIII. p. 230, and CLXVI.] [2 Thirlby at first had Lis liberty, till he began to preach against the reformation; but being pardoned, afterwards was in custody of the arch- CO.] K. HILLES TO H. BULLINGER. o4<7 Ely in Mary's reign, and who resided with the most reverend Matthew Parker, archbishop of Canterbury, (but under restraint there by reason of his profession of popish doctrine,) lately died, six or seven months since, at Lambeth, in the palace of the said archbishop of Canterbury. Some of the other bishops or prelates, who were placed under restraint by reason of their obstinacy, are still living ; but they scarcely suffer any inconvenience, unless perhaps some regret for their want of Uberty, and that they are prevented from the power of speaking or doing mischief. Of all these Nicolas Hethe^, who under queen Mary was archbishop of York, was the least troublesome, on which account perhaps he found more favour with our most serene queen Elizabeth ; for he had no other prison but his own house in the country, sufficiently comfortable, and in a healthy situation. Here, among us, by the favour of God all things are settled both in church and state. May the Lord long grant us this bless- ing ! I hear too, that the king of France is wisely maintaining that peace which you informed me had been concluded ; and I am very glad, and heartily thank God, that in the ratification of that peace sufficient regard was had to the security of the faithful, as you wrote me word, and as we now see to be the case. But I grieve very much, that the pestiferous sect of Arians is budding forth again in many other places besides Switzerland. But when the Lord Jesus shall come to judgment, will he find faith on the earth ? I pray you to salute in my name and that of my wife the aforesaid Julius Sancterentianus. Matters are not yet quite settled between our most serene queen and the duke of Alva*, touching the release of the persons and goods, or merchandize, of both bishop, with whom he lived in much ease and credit for ten years. He died Aug. 26, 1570, and was bm-ied by the archbishop in the chancel of Lambeth church. See Strype, Ann. i. i. 213. Parker, i. 278.] [3 Hethe, late archbishop of York, having been Lord Chancellor of England, and having in parliament declared the death of queen Mary, and the just title of the lady Elizabeth, her sister, to succeed ; for this duty towards his prince, he lived, after a little trouble, quietly and nobly in his own lordship of Chobham in Surrey, four miles from Windsor. He was always honourably esteemed by the queen, and sometimes had the honom* to bo visited by her majesty. See Strype, Ann. i. i. 212, and Parker, i. 281.] [t For an account of this transaction sec above. Letter CXL. p. 323. Queen Elizaljcth satisfied to the full the damages which the English mer- chants had sustained out of the Nethcrlauders' goods that Avere here stayed ; the rest she restored to the duke of Alva. Camden's Elizabeth, p. 191.] 3^8 E. HILLES TO H. BULLINGER. [ LET. nations which have been arrested or detained these two years. But though there is no agreement at present, there is some hope of it. But there is no prospect or even hope, as far as I can see or con- jecture, of any commerce in future, such as has for many years past been continued between the kings of England and the arch- dukes of Austria and Burgundy. There died, on the third of this month, another papist, or, as he seemed to liimself, a good catholic, of the name of Boxall ', who was chief secretary to queen Mary above-mentioned. He was a man of much moderation (as he used to boast) and of gentle dis- position, and lived also some years under restraint in the palace of the most reverend archbishop of Canterbury. May the Lord Jesus evermore preserve you and yours ! London, March 8, in the year of our salvation 1570, according to the computation of the church of England. Yours from my heart, Richard Hilles. CLII. R. HILLES TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 96.] London, July 27, 1571. Much health in the Lord. I wrote a letter to you, very reverend sir, on the 8th of March, which my son Barnabas, as he afterwards informed me, transmitted to you by Christopher Fros- chover, at the last Frankfort fair. You have received it, I hope, before this time ; and would learn from it that your last copious letter of the month of August in the past year has long since reached me. I have only, however, received this day your most gratifying letter from Zurich, of the 25th of February in this present year, together with your three letters addressed to the reverend the bishops of York, Ely, and Salisbury ; and also the three copies in manuscript, of which you write in the letter above- mentioned ; all of which I will take care shall be faithfully delivered to the bishops to whom you have directed them. I certainly much wonder where they have been so long delayed in their journey : but I am very glad to have received them even now ; and I have to thank you also for your present of a book printed in German, entitled, A promised Answer to the Testament of John Brentius, &c. Of this I have received two copies, besides five books printed in Latin, and three letters, viz. one to the bishop of London, another to the bishop of Durham, and the third to Henry Butler, [1 See below. Letter CLVI. note 1.] CLII.j R. HILLES TO H. BULLli\GER. O 1-9 together with the three manuscript copies above-mentioned ; which letters, as well as all the aforesaid seven printed books, I will take care shall be delivered as soon as possible, to the persons to whom in your letter you desired them to be sent^ This cloth I make you a present of; and I pray God that you may long enjoy it, though it is not very hkely that you will : for Jerome says most truly, quoting some philosopher or poet, The young may die soon, but the old cannot live long. That labour of yours, of which you inform me, in replying to the whole of that impudent popish bull which the Roman antichrist has vomited forth against our most serene queen, will be, without doubt, very greatly approved by the three bishops afore-mentioned, to whom you have sent those three copies ; and if they think it for the good of the kingdom, and that it will be agreeable to her most serene highness, they will publish it. I am much grieved at your so humbly entreating me to take in good part your writing to me, and that you ask my pardon for so freely employing my services ; for you may always employ them most freely as long as I live. By the blessing of God, before the dissolution or ending of the parliament held at Westminster, the above-mentioned Henry Butler was here with his master, Parkhurst, bishop of Norwich, and was anxiously expecting a letter from his mother ; for, as he then told me, he had not heard from her since his arrival in England. Master doctor Mont, however, informed him in my house, that a packet of letters had been left at his house in Strasburgh, in which he thought there were some addressed to this Henry Butler. In the month of June now last past, the very learned divine David Whitehead, who was an exile in queen Mary's time for the profession of orthodox doctrine, departed happily in the Lord. He also Uved about seven years a widower, as you write me word is now your own case ; but very lately, before the middle of this year, he married a young widow when he was himself about eighty. Master Cole too, who was also at that period an exile in Germany for preaching the gospel, died about the same time of the quinsey, on the day after he was taken ill. He was the archdeacon of Essex, in the diocese of London, and was preferred a month or two before his death to the deanery of Salisbury, but died here at London, on the same day, as is reported, or on the day preceding that on which he had determined to go from London to Sahsbury to receive induction, attended by many friends and domestics. [3 A paragraph respecting some cloth that BuUinger had bespoken is here omitted.] S50 B. HILLES TO H. BULLINGER. [lET. Thus from a slight and slender thread all human things depend, And those which seem the strongest now may soonest have an end^. I have taken care, previous to my finishing this letter, that all the manuscript copies aforesaid, and all the other printed books, have been delivered to the right reverend bishops to whom they were addressed ; and I hope that they will shortly acknowledge the receipt of them to your worship. Farewell, my very reverend master, in Christ our Saviom'. London, July 27, 1571. Yours heartUy, as you know, KiCHARD HiLLES, Anglus. p. S. July 31. Since my letter was sealed, I have seen and read your letter to the three right reverend bishops, viz, York, Ely, and Salisbury, already in print; and the first part also of your work above-mentioned, (from the manuscript copy, I under- stand, which you sent to the lord bishop of Ely,) also printed. And I am informed that some more pages of the same work are also printed ; so that the whole of that manuscript copy of yours will be printed and published as soon as possible. CLIII. BISHOP COX TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 97.] After July 27, lojl. Your letter, my very dear brother in Christ, which however I did not receive till almost the end of June, was most gratifying to me. I received at the same time two Httle books, the one against the Testament" of John Brentius, a man who is gone crazy through a variety of error. To this error of his, creeping on as it was by degrees, you have seasonably closed the way. The other book is a most powerful defence against that terrific bull, which however is lighter than any bubble ; in which you have so mauled the author, that he has no more breath remaining in him. We are all much in your debt for having so zealously taken up the common cause. I wrote to you on this subject very weakly and vapidly ; but one of my brethren^ has treated it more fully and copiously, and has also made for you a copy of the bull itself. It was your regard for us, and your indignation at the thing, and the most ardent zeal 1 "Omnia sunt hominum tenui pendentia filo, Et subito casu quae valuere ruunt." \} This Testament was published at Wittenberg, for the purpose of fore- warning all states not to allow the Zuinglians a toleration.] [3 Bishop Jewel.] CLIII.] BISHOP COX TO H. BULLINGER. 351 for the truth, that extorted from your piety this attack upon it. You have hitherto Hved in the most holy and devout study of the divine word, so as to cherish and promote its progress by every possible means. You were called to this from your earliest hfe ; you have sedulously adorned this your calhng ; and God will ena- ble you to persevere in it even to the end of life, to the peace of your own conscience, and the most eager expectation of all good men. Hence it is that you always take occasion to deserve well of the christian religion, and to attack with severity the enemies of godliness. Hence it is, that you both seasonably interpose a remedy for the disorder occasioned by Brentius, and restrain the fury of the [papal] bull. I will most dihgently take care that our queen, who is well skilled both in Latin and Greek, may be made acquainted with your respect and courtesy towards herself, and I will make her to have a most agreeable taste of your little book*. But since you refer to us the best manner of dealing with your book, we are of opinion that it should be printed, and pubhshed in the name of Henry Bullinger, as soon as possible ; and I will send you some copies by the earliest opportunity. That Henry Butler, of whom you "vvi'ite, has not yet called upon me. I will do my best, that when he comes, he shall have no occasion to require my assistance. May the good and great God preserve you, my most beloved brother in Christ, and that for many years, to the advantage of the church ; and I pray you to commend us to God in your prayers, those of us especially who are labouring in his vineyard. I write no news to you ; for my brother Horn has promised to take that office upon himseh'. Your very dear brother in the Lord, Richard, bishop of Ely. [■* In the month of September the archbishop caused it to be foirly bomid and sent to her, and fm-ther procured the printing of it in Latin, not without the advice of the Lord Treasm-er, and had it translated and printed in English too. The Latin, printed by John Day, had this title, Bullce Papisticce ante biennium contra sereniss. Anglice, Francice et Hibernice Reginam EUzabetham, et contra inclytuin Anglice regnuni promidgatce, Refutatio, orthodoxceque Regince et universi regni AnglicB Dejensio Henrychi Bullingeri. Strype, Parker, ii. 78.] 352 J. DAY TO H. BULLINGER. [lET. CLIV. J. DAY' TO H. BULLINGER. [B. 74.] London, Aug. 8, 1571. Reverend father in Christ, I heartily wish you heahh. Now that I have finished printing your book^, which I confidently be- lieve has been completed with accuracy and fidelity according to the copy sent me by the reverend father in Christ, doctor Cox, and which he had previously corrected with the utmost diligence ; it was his wish, most faithful pastor, that I should take care that half a dozen or more of these books should be sent over to you, if it could be done without inconvenience ; and I have found a suitable opportunity of effecting this. Moreover, the reverend fathers themselves will return you in their next letters their most deserved thanks for the pains you have bestowed in the composition of that book, and which is the greatest evidence of your good-will to England, which is divided from you by so great a distance. Mean- while may the Lord of glory so comfort you and his universal church by his most holy Spirit, that his truth may be advanced, and the kingdom of antichrist confounded and overthrown altoge- ther. And may Christ the Lord grant that more persons from every part of the world may exert themselves for this object with their whole heart, and bestow their utmost pains upon it. Take, I pray you, in good part my labour, such as it is, in this work. Farewell, most vigUant pastor. London, in the month of [August 1571^] Your most devoted, John Day. [1 John Day was printer to Edward VI, and in queen Mary's time a prisoner in Newgate for religion, and afterwards an exile. After the ac- cession of Elizabeth he resumed his i:)rinting, and to him posterity is largely indebted for editions of the writings of the reformers, and many works relative to the reformation. He was patronized and much encouraged by archbishops Parker and Grindal, and was the printer of the Acts and Monuments of Foxe. See Strype, Mem. ni. i. 320 ; Ann. i. i. 267.] [2 This book was Bullinger's confutation of the Bull of Pius V. against queen Elizabeth. In the month of September 1571, the archbishop (Parker) caused it to be fairly bound and sCnt to her, and further procured the printing of it in Latin, not without the advice of the Lord Treasurer; and had it translated, and printed in English too. Strype, Parker, ii. 78.] [3 The date is wanting in the MS. Simler dates it as above.] CLV.] BISHOP HORN TO H. BULLINGER. 353 CLV. BISHOP HORN TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 98.] London, Aug. 8, 1571. Though, my dearest Bullinger, neither love will admit of a suspicion of ingratitude, nor will prudence permit rashness of judg- ment, yet delay both weakens the ardent expectation of a duty that is owing, and negligence requires a serious apology for the omission of it. But the present case will not admit of any accusa- tion, inasmuch as I am neither conscious of an offence, nor does your disposition, far from being suspicious or angry, require any apology to be made. Since however, you may be in doubt as to the reason [of my not writing,] you shall be acquainted with it, lest your opinion of me should be shaken ; or since, perhaps, you may desire to know it, I will satisfy your wish, lest that opinion should be wounded. Do not however suppose that my not having replied to your letter sent so long since arises from a rash disregard of my duty, or a negligent forgetfulness of it ; or in any way from unkindness. The reason is, that we are somewhat in confusion at home, and there is a vehement commotion on all sides of us abroad, so that the very seas, even unto the coast nearest to yourselves, have been hghted up with the daily flames of war ; whereby there has neither been afforded me any certain opportunity of writing, nor since the death of our friend Abel has any method presented itself of forwarding a letter ; nor, if I had chosen to write, and been able to send my letter, could I have ascertained with certainty whether it had been delivered. Now however, having met with both an opportunity and a courier, no inducement ought to be wanting to one who has been so long invited by your most affecti- onate letter, and also incited by your most friendly salutations lately offered in the epistle prefixed to the pope's bull ; neither could in- clination be wanting to me who have so long and earnestly desired [to write]. But I am acting as those are wont to do, who when they are so encumbered with debt as to owe much to many persons, and have not wherewith to discharge the whole, surrender their property to one or other of their creditors, to make an equal dis- tribution among the rest ; and thus they satisfy each according to their means. In the same way, being greatly in debt not only to you, but also to my friends Gualter, Simler, Zuinglius, Lavater, Wolfius, and my other beloved brethren in Christ at Zurich, I pay all that I have into your hands, that you may therewith satisfy both yourself and my other creditors in those quarters. You must therefore equally distribute and share with them, whatever new 23 354 BISHOP HORN TO H. BULUNGER. [lKT. wares I have to dispose of, from England, Scotland, France, and Flanders. I do not offer you any commodities from Rome ; for I am aware that such are becoming* cheap among among you, as is apparent in many ways, and especially by that most learned refu- tation of the pope's bull, which you sent over some time since, and which is now bemg printed also for general circulation, Om* government has been for almost the last tlu-ee years in a dangerous and dreadful state of agitation ; being not only shaken abroad by the perjSdious attacks of our enemies, but troubled and disturbed at home by internal commotions. Both these kinds of pestilence, as is always the case, are the brood and offspring of popery, that pernicious and accursed fury of the whole world. But our noble and excellent virgin [queen], reposing in security at home, has broken both their forces at the same time, and destroyed the one without difficulty, and the other without bloodshed. Every thing turned out so unexpectedly as it were from above, that it seemed as though the Lord of hosts and of might had undertaken from his heaven the cause of his gospel, and had fought, as it were, with his own hands. The winds from heaven brought us in, as if with spontaneous gales, the arms, treasures, and ships of the one ; while the report that the royal army was advancing, dismayed and scattered the soldiers, baggage, and military stores of the other. Thus the one party were unconquered till they were completely routed ; the others were manifestly conquered before they had made any progress. There were only two noblemen \ and those of [1 The earls of Northumberland and Westmoreland. See p. 329. In addition to the account there given, the following summary wUl be acceptable, taken from the preface to Memorials of the Rebellion of 1569. London 1840, p. XVI. XIX. " The earls, after refusing to obey the queen's commands to repair to her presence, committed themselves irrevocably, by entering Dur- ham in anns on the 14th November. For a short period they acted with vigour, and proceeded rapidly to Ripon, Wetherby, and Tadcaster, and finally they assembled on ChflFord Moor. The queen of Scots was suddenly removed from Tutbury to Coventry, and the earls hesitated what course to pursue. The earl of Sussex, with Sadler and Hunsdon, felt insecure in York, which however they dm-st not leave on account of their inferiority in cavahy. They could not act on the offensive, as their levies came slowly in ;. and they were reduced to the mortifying alternative of keeping a watchful eye on the movements of the rebels. The earl of Sussex, (now lieutenant general of the army in the north,) directed Sir George Bowes, in the event of their proceeding southwards, to join him immediately with the northern horsemen. " From whatever cause — whether from 'mistrusting themselves', according to HoUinshcd j from * disagreement amongst themselves', according to lady CLV.] BISHOP HOKN TO H. BULLINGEK. 355 no influence or reputation ; men, to say the least of them, of the most worthless character, and of the old leaven, or, as they choose to call it, the old religion : their reputation was certainly somewhat out of date. These men, having secretly crossed the channel after these events, still he hid in the parts beyond sea, and are, as is reported, miserable vagabonds, as though they were accursed and fugitive Cains. This torch afterwards kindled some sparks of sedition in other parts of the kingdom^ ; but by the prudence of the government, or rather by divine providence, it was put out and extinguished without any difficulty ; so that now, thanks to immor- tal God! all England is at rest, and in the enjoyment of halcyon days. And I wish, if it had so pleased God, that I could say the same really, or nearly at least, (vere aut fere) of the church. For our church has not yet got free from those vestiarian rocks of offence, on which she at first struck. Our excellent queen, as you know, holds the helm, and directs it hitherto according to her pleasure. But we are awaiting the guidance of the divine Spirit, which is all we can do ; and we all daily implore him with earnest- ness and importunity to turn at length our sails to another quarter. Meanwhile, however, we who stand in a more elevated situation do not act in compliance with the importunate clamours of the multi- tude ; for it would be very dangerous to drag her on, against her will, to a point she does not yet choose to come to, as if we were wresting the helm out of her hands. But we aim at this, that although badly habited, we may yet be strong hearted in doing the Lord's worlc ; and we are not so much concerned about the Northumberland ; or, more probably, from perceiving that no response was made to their movements by the great body of the [Roman] Catholics of England, — the rebels suddenly retreated and retm-ned to the county of Dm'ham; where, instead of pursuing vigorous measures to restore their ' moral force', and increase theii* numbers, they wasted their time and strength in laying siege to Barnard Castle ; dm-ing whose prolonged and gallant resistance, the army of the south, commanded by the lords Warwick and Clinton, amved at Doncaster ; when Sussex, thus powerfully supported, advanced rapidly toward the county of Dm-ham; and on his approach the earls, without waiting for an attack, suddenly dismissed their infantry, and flying with their cavalry towards Ilcxliam, afterwards took refuge in Scotland. Thus terminated an enterprise, begun without foresight, conducted without energy, and ending in dastardly and inglorious flight ; entailing on the fami- lies of those concerned lasting misery ; and inflicting on the leaders, attainder, proscription, and death."] [2 Namely in Norfolk. See p. 342.] 23—2 356 BISHOP HORN TO H. RULLINGER. [f.ET, fitness' of our apparel, as about rightly dividing the bread of the Lord ; nor, in fine, do we deem it of so much consequence if our own coat appears unbefitting, as it is to take care that the seamless coat of the Lord be not rent asunder. There are not however wanting some men of inferior rank and standing, deficient indeed both in sagacity and sense, and entirely ignorant and unknown, who, since they do not yet perceive the church to square with their wishes, or rather vanities, and that so far from agreeing with their follies, the wind is rather directly contrary, for this cause some of them desert their posts, and hide themselves in idleness and obscu- rity ; others, shaping out for themselves their own barks, call together conventicles, elect their own bishops, and holding synods one with another, frame and devise their own laws for themselves. They reject preaching, despise communion, would have all churches destroyed, as having been formerly dedicated to popery ; nor are they content with merely deriding our ministers, but regard the ofiice itself as not worth a straw. And thus, as far as lieth in them, they are too rashly and precipitately accessory to the wretched shipwreck of our church, and are doubtless retarding not a little the free progress of the gospel. They themselves, in the mean time, wonderfully tossed about by I know not what waves of error, and miserably borne along, I know not whither, on the various gales of vanity, are reduced to the most absurd ravings of opinion. They therefore cut themselves off, as they say, from us ; or rather, like Theudas, they depart with their own party, and act just like persons who, perceiving the wind somewhat against them, so that they cannot directly reach the point they aim at, refuse to reserve themselves for a more favourable breeze, but leaping out of the ship, rush headlong into the sea and are drowned. But here it is wonderful how fit an instrument, as they think, the adversaries of our religion have laid hold of for dishonouring the gospel. They whisper in the queen's ears, that this is the fruit of our gospel now coming to maturity ; that this is the only harvest of our doctrine to be expected ; so that, unless her pious heart had. been altogether inflamed with the love of the truth, it would long since have been cooled by their aspersions. You see I have en- deavoured, my excellent Bullinger, as briefly as I could, to make you perceive, as it were at one glance, the whole state of our affairs, and the aspect of the government, and the entire condition of the church. [1 There is a play upon the words pannus and panis, which cannot be preserved in the English translation.] CLV.] BISHOP HORN TO H. BULLINGEB. 357 France, long since disabled by her own wounds, and as if wearied with wars, has at length allowed herself a httle breathing time^ She admits the gospel indeed, but as if it were a pestilence; so that it visits no cities^ save a few, and those of no importance ; or, if any of larger size, in such a manner as to abide without the walls. Very great precaution is taken for the court, lest Christ should sometimes be admitted even as a guest ; and he is therefore ordered to bo banished, under a heavy penalty, to some miles dis- tanced A cardinaP, a man of rank and piety, and an exile here among us for the sake of rehgion, while he was sojourning some days at Canterbury, waiting for a wind for his prosperous and safe return, was taken off, (as they report, and it is indeed credible,) by the deadly poison of the papists, and wasted away, destroyed by wickedness and crime. But why am I exporting any news from France to Zurich ? for nothing can be conveyed from France which is not well known to the people of Zurich, and which you have not in abundance. I think however that you have not heard this one circumstance, or at least that it is but little known among you. The duke of Anjou", brother to the king of France, has become an ardent suitor of our queen. What will be the event of this, is not yet known. As I do not hear that it is altogether approved of, so [2 A treaty of peace with the Huguenots was concluded at St Germain on Aug. 15 th, 1570 ; and early in the following spring the 7th synod of the Reformed Church of France assembled at Rochelle, being the th-st which received the sanction of royal authority, and it commenced its sittings under the direct protection of the king's letters patent. Smedley's Hist, of the Re- formed Religion in France. Vol. i. p. 346.] [3 As an especial gratification to his " dear and most beloved aunt," the queen of Navan-e, the king empowered her to have divine service performed, in the presence of as many persons as chose to assist, in one house in each of her fiefs, even during her absence from it. Smedley, ut supra, i. 344.] [■* The subm*bs of cei-tain provincial towns, expressly named, were set apart for the exercise of general worship, provided such towns were neither the actual residence of the court for the time being, nor within two leagues of that residence. In Paris and within ten leagues it was altogether prohi- bited. Smedley, ut supra.] [5 Odet de Coligny, archbishop of Toulouse, and Cardinal do Chatillon, was condemned by the council of Trent for embracing the protestant faith. He fled hither out of France, in 1568, after the battle of St Denis, and on his return, in 1570, was poisoned by one of his servants. He was honom-ably bui'ied among the raetroiJolitans, in the cathedral at Cantcrbuiy. See Strype, Annals, n. i. 353.] [<> For a full account of all particuhu's relating to the proposed marriage, see Strype, Annals, ii. 1. 48, &c. and Camden, Eliz. p. 160, &c.] S58 BISHOP HORN TO H. BULLINGER. [lET. neither do I understand that it is altogether dishked. If you ask what I myself think, it is a difficult thing to be a judge in the aiFairs of princes. I shall merely say, that in my opinion this ex- pected marriage will never take place. There are many reasons which make me fear it, and not a few which lead me to wish for it. But I leave these matters, like all others which concern us, to be well and happily disposed of by the wisdom and goodness of God. And should he make it tend as much to the propagation of the gospel, and the setting forth of the glory of the name of Christ, as it seems at first sight hkely to conduce both to the private ad- vantage of individuals, and the public good, both my life and my wishes will be abundantly satisfied. And now to interweave a few observations respecting our neigh- bour Scotland. Having been lately almost ruined by the most foul homicides, and stained with the blood of her first nobihty, both of her king, a most illustrious youth from England, and after him of the excellent regent James, both of whom they took off by horrible and lamentable murders, she is still in a flame through the mutual abhorrence of these events in both parties. The queen, being suspected of the murder of her husband, and required by the nobles of her kingdom either to prove her innocence, or suffer for her guilt, as I mentioned in my last letter, has secretly taken refuge here in England, where she is still detained captive. She has often meditated an escape, and others have contrived plans for her rescue, but hitherto to no purpose, for she is very diligently and carefully guarded : with what design, few can tell ; with what result, does not yet appear ; with what hope, or rather what fear, I grieve to say. He who has forced her to this step, both easily can, (for he is powerful,) should it seem good to him, and he readily will, (for he is merciful,) if he is entreated, order all things accord- ing to his will, and also according to our OAvn. But in this country how wonderfully and beyond all expectation the God of all good- ness and the Lord of glory has preserved every thing safe and sound, as it is certain from experience, so it is true in the relation of it ; yet as being of rare occurrence, will almost be incredible in the hearing. For both in the commotions in France, and the con- tests in Scotland, and moreover with the secret hatred of Spain, none of which could ever be overcome by any shght means or ordinary exertions, our Elizabeth, the sole nurse (as it were) of these affairs, and solely for the sake of the gospel, has preserved the friends of godliness, who would otherwise doubtless have been destroyed long since, free from harm. But observe that ancient CLV.] BISHOP HORN" TO H, BULLIXGER. 359 and most convenient, and in a manner the leading stratagem of the papists, which is now both rendered famihar to us hj daily experii ence, and pecuhar to themselves by long use and possession. They besiege the tender frame of the most noble virgin Elizabeth with almost endless attacks, and most studiously endeavour to compass her death, both by poison, and violence, and witchcraft, and treason, and all other means of that kind which could ever be imagined, and which it is horrible even to relate. Hitherto how- ever, as God has had for his gospel a faithful and active Deborah, so truly has he made her a triumphant Judith ; and we implore him also to make her an aged Anna. These Scottish wares wliich I have given you, are not only sordid and unsound, but really black. Now then accept of some from Flanders, few indeed in number, but which however you will without doubt call elegant. A certain person was here not long since, a doctor of laws, of some learning, such an one, I imagine, as those among the Jews who menaced Christ with death : his name is Story, a man, as it were, born for cruelty, a most raging persecutor^ in the Marian times, to whom it was gain to kill the saints, and sport to shed blood. This man then, after the happy day had shone upon us in which God raised our Elizabeth to the head of the Enghsh government, was apprehended and thrown into prison on an evident charge of treason. A short time afterwards, when the gaoler was not so careful as he should have been, he broke out of prison and escaped into Flanders, where he entered into the service^ of the duke of Alva, the capital enemy of our kingdom, who is resident in that country. Here, like a fury fresh- from hell, or more truly, like a wicked Davus, it is wonderful how he is continually making mischief. Having obtained hcence from [1 Dr Story was one of the examiners Of the martyr Philpot. His cha- racter may be judged of from the following language, addressed to Philpot, and recorded by Foxe : " Well, Sir, you are like to go after your fathers, Latimer the sophistei', and Ridley, who had nothing to allege for himself but that he had learned his heresy of Cranmer. When I came to him with a poor bachelor of arts, he trembled as though he had had the palsy ; as these heretics have always some token of fear whereby a man may know them, as you may see this man's eyes do tremble in his head. But I despatched them : and I tell thee that there hath never been yet any one burnt, but I liave spoken with him, and been a cause of his despatch." Acts and Monuments, vii. 628. See also Strype, Annals, i. ii. 297.] [2 He was appointed searcher of all ships at Antwerp for English goods and heretical books, (Strype, Parker, ir. 366,) and was allowed a moiety of the confiscation. Carte's Hist, of England.] 360 BISHOP HORN TO H. BULLINGER. [lET. the duke, he plunders, annoys, and imprisons the merchants arriving in those parts ; he entices the people of England to rebel- hon, is strenuously and solicitously urgent with Alva to afford a hberal supply both of men and means for so holy an object ; lastly, he is endeavouring hand and foot, with all his might, to procure by some unheard-of cruelty ' the premature and lamentable destruction of the most noble queen his sovereign, and that of the government of liis honoured country. Here however the merchants, who being daily scourged by the most cruel stripes of this Davus, had a fuller perception of them to their greater sorrow, and without any hope of rehef, take common counsel among themselves, and cry out as it were with one voice, that he must be carried off, which they thus effected with consummate artifice. There comes to him one of liis friends^ whose fidehty he least suspected, but who had been suborned by the merchants : this man privately whispers in his ear that a ship^ has just arrived from England, laden with I know not what golden mountains of treasure. Fired with the love of plunder, he straightway salhes forth, promising the money to liimself, and certain death to the merchants. After he had entered the ship, and was prying about in every corner, and had just gone down into the interior of the vessel, they suddenly closed the hatches, and with their sails set are carried by a prosperous and safe breeze into England. And here, if in addition to all the sliips of the Turkish empire laden with treasure even the whole Venetian fleet with all its wealth had met them, and been offered to them on their way, I well know that they would not have exchanged this mer- chandize and worthless ladino; of their httle vessel for all those treasures. And so at length he was brought to London, amidst the great congratulations of the people, awaiting him on his return ; and shortly after being convicted of treason, hung* and quartered, was made an ill-savoured martyr of the Roman church, and enrolled in the popish catalogue of saints, next to Felton, who affixed the pope's buU to the palace-gates of the bishop of London. [1 Story was arraigned, and was to be charged with treason, for having consulted with one Prestall, a man much addicted to magical illusions, against his prince's life. Camden's Elizabeth, p. 168.] [2 One Parker, who was afterwards cast into prison, by the craft and malice of Story's private friends. Strype, Parker, n. 367.] [3 He was decoyed on board the ship of Cornelius de Eycke, at Bergen op Zoom. Carte's Hist, of England.] [4 Story suffered at Tyburn in June 1571, and was made a saint at Rome, and his martyrdom printed, and set up in the English college there. Strype, Annals, I. ii. 297.] CLV.] BISHOP HORN TO H. BULLINGER. S6l I have moreover transmitted to you, my Bullinger, by this car- rier ten crowns, not so much by way of an honourable, or at least an honorary present, as a token, such as it is, of my regard towards you. The whole of this sum I desire to be expended upon a public entertainment in your common hall, devoted to the remem- brance of me, though without a sacrifice. Farewell all of you, and live happy. I desire you would so think of me, just as you are accustomed to regard one who for your sake would willingly plan any thing by his advice, or accom- plish it by his assistance, or embrace it in his thoughts, or lastly, promote it by his influence. May Christ Jesus preserve the church •which he has redeemed by his precious blood, disappoint the designs of all her adversaries, frustrate their attempts, and break their power ! Farewell, most loving Bulhnger, and live in him who is the author of life. London, Aug. 8, 1571. Wholly yours, Robert Winton. CLVI. BISHOP PARKHURST TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 99.] LuDHAM, Aug. 10, 1571. Health to you, most agreeable Bullinger. On the 4th of March BoxalP, a notorious papist, and secretary to queen Mary, died at Lambeth^ ; where also Thirlby, one of her councillors and bishop of Ely, died before him. About the end of June David Whitehead', an octogenarian, and a man adorned with all kinds of [5 John Boxall was removed from office by Elizabeth on her accession, t6 make way for Cecil, and his behaviour on the occasion sets his character in a favom-able light; for instead of interposing obstacles to his successor in office, it is clear, from a few of his letters to Cecil dated about this period, that he cherished no sentiment but that of anxiety to afford him all the assistance in his power. See Burgon's Life and Times of Sir T. Gresham. Vol. I. p. 214.] [6 In 1563, the council removed Boxall and Thirlby from the Tower, on account of the plague having appeared in London; and on Sept. 15, wrote to the archbishop to receive them, " and to give them convenient lodging, each of them one man allowed them, and to use thorn as was requisite for men of their sort ; and that they would satisfy his lordship for the charges of their commons." Boxall was doctor in divinity of Oxford, and had been dean of Peterborough, Norwich, and Windsor. Strypo, Parker, i. 279, &c.] [7 Whitehead had been recommended by archbishop Cranmer to be arch- bishop of Armagh, and was afterwards an exile for religion, and pastor of an English congregation at Frankfort. Strype, Mcmor, ni. i. 231.] 362 BISHOP PARKHURST TO H. BULLINGER. [lET. learning, departed this life at London. Thomas Spencer \ a doctor in divinity and archdeacon of Chichester, died on the 8th of July. He was a most dihgent preacher in the Suffolk part of my diocese. He was with us at Zurich. Master Cole, not the one who was at Zurich-, but whom master Wolfgang Weidner was so fond of, the archdeacon of Essex ^, departed this life about the same time. Both of them were remarkable for their eloquence in the pulpit. Almost two years since there was an implacable quarrel here at Norwich among the foreigners ; nor are they even yet reconciled, though there is some hope that things will be on a better footing and more peaceable in future. You would scarce believe what labour I have undergone, to say nothing of expense, during the whole time ; and yet these refractory people will not give up a single point. I have always treated them with the greatest mild- ness and consideration, though of late a little harshly, contrary to my nature. But what could you do ? If we cannot succeed in one way, we must try another. Three* of their preachers, ambi- tious and aspiring men, occasioned and continued all this disturbance. The whole congregation was very near being broken up. Their number was about four thousand. The Enghsh, I allow, were somewhat troublesome in Germany ; but, if you compare them with these, they were quietness itself. I do not in the least exaggerate. There have been great dissensions among their countrymen, both at Sandwich in Kent, and likewise in London, which, as I hear, are not yet composed. In the French church here every thing is very quiet. They are in number about four himdred. [1 Spencer subscribed, as a member of convocation, the Articles of 1562. Btrype, Annals, i. i. 488.] [2 This was William Cole, fellow, and aftei-wards president, of Corpus Christi College, Oxford, and concemed in the translation of the Geneva Bible. Strype, Memor. iii. i. 232. Annals, i. i. 343. Parker, i. 528. Some of his letters are given in this volume.] [3 Thomas Cole, an exile at Frankfort, and afterwards Rector of High Ongar, and one of the subscribers to the Articles of 1562. Strj'pe, Memor. III. i. 404. Cranmer, 52. Annals, i. i. 488.] [4 There was a church allowed in the city of Norwich for strangers thaC fled thither for religion from the parts of Flanders : which church was sup- pUed with three ministers named Anthonius, Thcophilus and Isbrandus.' These, falling in their sermons upon particular doctrines controverted among themselves, preached so earnestly in answers and confutations one of another, that the congregation was all in confusion, and the peace of the chiu-ch broken. Whereupon the bishop interposed, and enjoined them to forbear that manner of preaching one against another. Stiype, Annals, n. i. 174. Parker, ii. 82.] CLVI.] BISHOP PARKHURST TO H. BULLINGER. 363 The true religion is flourishing in Scotland. But the nobles are sometimes quarrelling with each other, not on account of religion, to which all parties are favourable, but for the custody of the king, which is their chief object. The queen of Scotland is still detained in England. The archbishop of St Andrew 's\ the author of many disturbances in Scotland, was hung on a gibbet last May. The marquis of Northampton^ (the brother of queen Catharine, the last wife of Henry the eighth, and my most gentle mistress, whom I attended as chaplain twenty-three years since,) died about the beginning of August. When I was in London, he married a very beautiful German girl, who remained in the queen's court after the departure of the margrave of Baden and Cecilia' his wife from England. Our marquis was sixty years old, and I believe much more. Your young friend, Henry Butler, is in good health. [5 James Hamilton, the natural son of James, first Earl of Arran. He was one of the Queen of Scots' privy council, and performed the ceremony of christening her son. He was in the castle of Dumbarton when that fortress was taken by sui-prise, from whence he was carried to Stirling, where on April 1st, 1570, he was hanged on a live tree, which gave occasion to the following lines : "Vive diu, felix arbor, semperque vireto Frondibus, ut nobis talia poma feras." He was put to death because he was strongly suspected of being concerned in the death of the regent Murray, by whom he had been declared a traitor. Beatson's Political Index. Carte however says, in his History of England, that he was condemned, not for Darnley's or Murray's murder, with which they endeavoured to blacken him, though innocent, but for rebellion against the prince of Scotland in adhering to his mother; and that the sentence was the effect of Lenox's personal enmity to the house of Hamil. ton.] [s William Parr, first baron Parr of Kendall, created marquis of North- ampton 1547; attainted 1554, when his honours became forfeited; again created marquis Northampton 1559 ; ob. 1571. s. p. Nicolas's SjTiopsis of the Peerage.] ["t She was sister to the king of Sweden, and arrived in England with her husband Sept. 7, 1565. The margrave returned to Germany in November, but " hathe lefte here behynd him in the courte the lady Cecilie his wyfe, with whose companyo and conversation the queue is so muche delighted, ag she doothe not onely allowe her very honourable bouge of courte, three measse of meat twyse a daye for her mayds and the rest of her familye, but also her majestic hathe delte so liberally with her husbande, that he hathe a yearly pension of 2000 crownes, which he is to enjoye so longe as he suffereth the ladye his wife to i-esyde here in Englande." Lodge's Illustra- tions, Vol. I. p. .358. Strype, Annals, i. ii. 198, 210.] 364) BISHOP PARKHURST TO H. BULLINGER. [lET. I wish every happiness to your chief magistrates, council, preachers, citizens, and the whole estate of Zurich. Salute in my name your sons Henry, Rodolph, and the third, whose name I have forgotten, your daughters Truth and Dorothy, Simler, Lavater, Zuinglius, your sons-in-law ; Wolfius, Haller, Wickius, Froschover, Julius, John Henry Fabricius, and all the rest. My invahde salutes you and yours, sons, daughters, and all. In haste, Ludham. Aug. 10, 1571. You will learn all the other news from the letter to Gualter. Yours, J. Parkhurst, N. CLVII. H. ZANCHIUS TO BISHOP JEWEL. [B. 75.] Heidelberg, Sept. 2, 1571. It is true, most learned bishop Jewel, that, though I have always esteemed you by reason of your singular piety and virtue ever since we were together at Strasburgh, I have never written to you, nor congratulated you as I ought to have done, upon the dignity to which your virtue has advanced you. All this I ac- knowledge to be the case. But if any one should infer from hence that I therefore have held and do hold you in small estimation, I should deny the consequence, and say that such a person is guilty of false reasoning, by putting non causa pro causa. For there exist other reasons why this duty has been, I will not say neglected by me, but omitted ; though, were I to detail and explain them, my excuse would extend to a greater length than your patience could endure. One of them, however, I cannot pass over in silence : and that is, that after your return to your most beloved country, I was wonderfully tossed about both by land and sea, to the great injury of my affairs ; being persecuted beyond belief, partly by the enemies of the truth at Strasburgh, partly by the foes to disciphne, with whom the followers of Servetus united their forces at Chia- venna'. What person, I ask, could bear in mind all and each of his friends, amidst such great storms as these ? And when the first opportunities of congratulating or writing upon any subject are ]} Zanchius was appointed professor at Strasburgh in 1553, and remained there almost eleven years. Ho wrote two treatises against the Servetian or Socinian hypothesis, at the solicitation of Frederic III. elector Palatine, by whom he was appointed divinity professor at Heidelberg in 1568. One of these was entitled De Dei natura; the other, Dc tribus Elohim uno eodemque Jehova.} CLVII.] H. ZANCHIUS TO BISHOP JEWEL. 365 once gone by, it seems quite superfluous and unseasonable to write about such things at any later period. But no occasion for my writing, worthy of your virtue and dignity, has been since afforded me, except at the present time. There has not indeed been wanting a very pressing subject, only it was a personal one, which did not £0 much recommend, as compel me, as it were, to address you as well as others; but, to speak candidly, I dared not take the same hberty with you as I did with some others, with whom, though they were persons of great consequence, I lived upon a more intimate foot- ing when I was at Strasburgh, than with yourself. For you had gone away to Zurich with Peter Martyr, while we remained at Stras- burgh. Whence it arose, that my famihar and friendly intercourse with the other noble and learned individuals increased more and more, which could not so easily be the case as regarding you and myself. This then is one reason why you have heretofore received no letters from me. But I could not at this time on any account omit writing to you ; for a matter of importance and one most worthy of you now presents itself, which compels me to address you. When master Mont returned from England in June last, he informed me, together with some others, that the controversy has again been stirred up in your churches, about certain habits, which her most serene majesty requires the bishops and ministers to wear in the administration of the word or sacraments ; and that there are not a few men of your order, who are minded rather to resign their office, and even retire from the ministry, than adopt the use of such habits. From hence, he adds, is to be feared the entire downfall of those churches. He has therefore requested me to write, both to her most serene majesty, to admonish her of her duty ; and also to those bishops who are known to me, and with whom I am upon a footing of friendship. He mentioned you among the first, for that, by reason of your virtue and the influence arising from it, you pos- sessed much authority. I excused myself, and alleged my want of abiUty ; but no excuse would avail. At last therefore, after the per- suasion of many of my friends, I was ordered even by my most illus- trious sovereign to take the matter in hand. Being thus compelled, I wrote first of all a letter^ to her most serene majesty, and, as I trust, not an improper one, in which I exhort and beseech her not to give ear to such counsels as arc certainly inconsistent with the [2 See the following letter. Archbishop Grindal, to whom it was sent to be dehvered to the queen, thought it best, upon the advice of some of the council, not to present it. See Strype, Grindal, 157, and Grindal's letter to Zanchy, in the Parker Society's Edition of his works, p. 333.] 366 H. ZAXCHIUS TO BISHOP JEWKL. [lET. duty of a good sovereign. I desire nothing more earnestly than that her most serene majesty would listen, not so much to my advice as to that of all my colleagues and godly friends, and of our most illustrious prince himself. And that she may do this, we do not so much request from herself, as from God. But since we are ignorant as to what she will do, and it may possibly happen that she will persist in her present opinion ; and in the mean time, if the bishops themselves are unwilling in any way to alter their de- termination, the church will be in danger : our brethren have there- fore judged it expedient that some of the more eminent and discreet bishops should be written to, and requested to advise the rest, that, should not the queen by any means be induced to revoke her orders, they ought not themselves on this account to choose rather to desert their posts than to obey the royal command ; for that there seems no reason why it should be lawful for a pastor to for- sake his flock, so long as he is freely permitted to teach, and to administer the sacraments according to the word of God, although he may be forced to do some things of which he cannot altogether approve ; provided only that they are not such as are intrinsically and of their own nature sinful : for if such things be commanded, we must say with the apostles, that we ought to obey God rather than men : and in the mean time each person should abide in his own calling, and take care of his own flock. But if things in their own nature indifferent be prescribed by law and the queen's com- mand, since it is the only alternative, either to resign one's post or to yield obedience to such a command, we ought rather to obey, but with a due protest against it ; and the people should be in- structed why and for what reason obedience has been paid to such a command, rather than that they should be waiting for the time when their pastor should be deprived, and compelled to resign his flock to another. And this opinion is so plain and evident, both from the sacred writings, and the fathers and ecclesiastical liistories, that to adduce any proof of it to those who are even mode- rately versed in the scriptures would be altogether superfluous. For a lawful and necessary calling is never to be deserted for the sake of things which are in their own nature indifferent. We doubt not, most learned Jewel, but that these things are well known to you. We therefore request you to interpose your authority, and with your wonted ability and discretion so consult with your other most reverend and right worshipful episcopal brethren, that they may each of them abide in their respective calling and station. For Satan is surely aiming at nothing else. CLVII.J H. ZANCUIUS TO BISHOP JEWEL. 367 than that by the separation of the true bishops, whether by right or wrong, from their flocks, the whole church may be thrown into confusion. He must therefore be resisted, lest he should succeed in his most impious and ungodly purpose. May the Lord preserve both yourself and all the other pious and holy bishops to his church, guide you by his Spirit, and by your assistance advance his king- dom ! And we pray you most earnestly on your part to entreat the Lord for us, and especially for our most illustrious prince. And I especially commend myself to you, most pious and learned prelate, as also Bodolph Gualter, and Rodolph Zuingle, grandson of the great Zuingle : they are both of them studious and godly youths. You will be informed by them respecting the state of our affairs. Heidelberg, Sept. 2, 1571. H. Zanchius, in his own name, and in that of his colleagues. CLVIII. H. ZANCHIUS TO QUEEN ELIZABETH. [B. App. 1.] Heidelberg, Se'pt. 10, 1571. We have been informed, most serene and most christian queen, to our exceeding grief, that the flame of discord, respecting I know not what vestments, and which we thought had been extinguished long since, has been stirred up afresh as though from hell, and rekindled, to the incredible offence of all godly persons, in your majesty's kingdom. And the occasion of this flame has originated from hence ; forasmuch as your most serene majesty, at the per- suasion of some individuals, excellent in other respects, and actuated by a zeal, though certainly not according to knowledge, for pre- serving uniformity in rehgion, has now more than ever formed the resolution, and decreed, willed, and commanded that all bishops and ministers of churches should themselves be attired, during the per- formance of divine service, in the white linen garments that the mass-priests wear in the popish religion. And there is great reason to fear lest this fire be kindled, and send forth its flames, far and wide ; and that all the churches of that most flourishing and power- ful kingdom be consumed, to the perpetual dishonour of your most serene majesty. For that the greater number of them are bishops, men distinguished both for learning and piety, who choose rather to give up their oflice and stations than to admit such vestments against their conscience, as being relics, or at least symbols of idolatry and popish superstition, and to defile themselves therewith; and offend the weaker brethren by their example. But what else were 368 H, ZANCHIUS TO QUEEN ELIZABETH. [lET. this, than for the sake of those vestments to destroy the whole body of the church? For that truly is Satan's great object, by sowing the seeds of dissension among the bishops. This also was his aim in the early ages of the church, when he stirred up between the eastern and western churches the dispute respecting Easter', and other ceremonies of the like kind. Wherefore it was not with- out reason that Irenseus, bishop of Lyons, in a letter^ sent from France to Rome, sharply rebuked pope Victor, who, through his I know not what kind of zeal, but certainly not according to know- ledge, desired to excommunicate all the Asiatic churches, because they would not celebrate Easter at the same time as they did at Rome. For this was nothing else than, through an unseasonable desire of retaining the same ceremonies in every church, to divide and tear in pieces the unity of the churches. As soon therefore as I heard that so great a destruction was impending over the church of Christ in that kingdom, I forthwith, from the duty which 1 owe as well to the church of Christ as to your serene majesty, and in fine to your whole realm, determined to write to you, and to en- deavour to the best of my power, to find out a remedy for so great an evil ; some persons who fear Christ, and are friendly to your most serene majesty, exhorting me to undertake this office. But I had scarcely begun to turn it over in my mind, when lo ! our most illustrious prince commands me to put it into execution; by which command indeed he has only added spurs to me who was already going on of my own accord, but has also imposed upon me the necessity of writing. Your most serene majesty, therefore, will be the less surprised at this my boldness, since I am writing, not so much of my own inclination, and by the advice of my friends, as at the command of my most illustrious sovereign, and your most serene majesty's great friend. But in the first place I have thought it most expedient for me, first of all to advise your majesty of what is your duty under existing circumstances ; and then humbly to pray you, through Jesus Christ our Lord, resolutely to perform it. [1 The Asiatic bishops commemorated the anniversary of Christ's death on the 14th of March, on whatever day of the week it happened, as being the day on which the Jews kept their passover. Hence it arose, for the most part, that the festival of Easter was held on other days of the week than the first. For an account of the controversy, which began in the time of Anicetus, bishop of Rome, in the reign of Antoninus Pius, and was revived in the episcopate of Victor, towards the end of the second century, see Du Pin. i. GO. Moshcim. Cent. ii. ii. ch. ix.] [- The substance of this letter is given in Eusebius, Ilist. Eccl. v. ch. 24.] ( L^■lIl.] n. ZANCHius to queen elizaretii. 369 And I entreat your most serene majesty to take in good part this my writing ; for it proceeds from christian love towards the church, and from the singular respect which I so abundantly entertain to- wards your most serene majesty. The Lord knoweth all things. And now to the subject. When the apostle, writing to Timothy^, orders prayers to be made for kings, and for all that are in authority ; and declares that the end of their being placed in authority is, that we may lead a quiet life in all, that is, in perfect, godliness and honesty ; he teaches with sufficient clearness what is the duty of godly kings and princes ; namely, that they should take care and provide, above all, that true religion and the true worship of God, if it has been ban- ished, should be restored ; and when restored, preserved in all its integrity ; all things which in any wise savour of impiety being driven away ; in the next place, that men should live honestly and holily, all kinds of impurity and licentiousness being put to flight; lastly, that a public peace and holy friendship be cultivated among the people, all occasions of discord being removed as far as possible. That these are the three principal parts of the kingly office, and of that of every godly magistrate, is not only, as we have seen, openly taught by the apostle, but all men of learning, and who entertain proper notions of the duty of a magistrate, with one consent and one mouth confirm the same. And this beino- the case, I do not see how your most serene majesty can, with a good conscience, propose to the consciences of godly bishops the resump- tion of the habits in question, and other things of that kind which still savour of popish superstition, and which have once been banish- ed from the churches; and so to propose them, as by your com- mand to compel the adoption of them. For first of all, this is repugnant to the chief and principal part of the kingly office. For if the magistrate is especially to provide that the worship of God may be maintained in all its integrity ; and if on this account all things are to be removed Avhich can any wise violate this worship either of their own nature, or incidentally ; and therefore all things are, as far as possible, to be restored according to the rule of God's word, and the ancient and apostohc, and consequently purer and more simple form of religion ; in fine, if, as the apostle enjoins, we are to abstain, not only from all evil, but from all appearance of evil ; how, 1 pray you, most serene and godly queen, can you in- troduce, by your royal mandate, into the church of God those things which arc repugnant to the purity of apostolic worship; which [3 Sec 1 Tim. ii. 2.] 24 S70 H. ZANCHIUS TO QUEEN ELIZABETH. [lET. savour of popish superstition ; which neither tend to the edification of the godly, nor to order, or ornament, except such as is mere- tricious ; and which, lastly, can bring no advantage to the church, but on the contrary may occasion it much mischief? It is certain that by this law respecting the habits all godly persons will be of- fended ; the ungodly will laugh in their sleeve, and hence hope for further concessions ; while the middle sort, that is, those who have but lately turned from impiety to godliness, but are not yet sufiiciently established, will be in danger ; and, if we may speak from human judgment, will rather look back upon that ancient superstition to which we are inclined by nature, than fix their eyes firm and sted- fast upon true religion ; so that this decree will not in the least ad- vance godliness, while it may probably tend very much to the advancement of uno-odliness. For though these habits are not of themselves, that is, of their own nature, evil or unclean, yet they cannot be altogether free from impurity by reason of their having been previously and so recently abused. It certainly cannot be de- nied but that they may at least afi"ord occasion to much mischief and to the grossest superstitions. But we are to avoid even the occasions of evil. To what end then will you obtrude those things upon the church, from which no benefit but very great harm must be expected ? for this is to tempt God. Your most serene majesty should remember that it is not written without a cause, that " who- ever touches pitch shall be defiled by it." Nor did the apostle command us without reason to purge away the old leaven, because "a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump." Nor were the Jews unadvisedly rebuked by Hosea for having transplanted the shoots of superstition from Israel into their garden, that is, into the true church. It is most evident, most godly queen, that we ought to have no business whatever with the papists in matters of rehgion, except in such things as they have in common with the apostles. Wherefore, I pray you, are certain kings, although godly in other respects, rebuked in scripture, for not having taken away the high places in which Jehovah was wont to be worshipped before the building of the temple by their pious forefathers ? Assuredly, be- cause after the building and appointment of the temple, God would no longer permit any vestiges to remain of any other place of wor- ship. So also upon the manifestation of Christ's kingdom the Aaronic ceremonies and garments ought no longer to have any place. Wherefore the apostles very properly took care that they should bo done away with after the ascension of Christ ; so that not even any relics should remain. But if they piously removed them, the CLVIII.] H. ZANCHIUS TO QUEEN ELIZABETH. 37 J' papists must impiously have restored them. And who is there so ignorant as not to know which it is best to follow, the pious simpHcity of the apostles, or the impious pomp of the papists ? Your most serene majesty may believe me that the restoration of such popish vestments will be a far greater evil than may appear at the first glance, even to those who are most sharp-sighted. For I seem to see and hear the monks calling out from their pulpits, and confirming their people in this ungodly religion by your majesty's ex- ample, and saying, "What ? why the queen of England herself, most learned and prudent as she is, is beginning by degrees to return to the religion of the holy Roman church ; for the most holy and con- secrated vestments of the clergy are now resumed. It is to be hoped that she will also at length restore to their former position all the other doctrines, rites, and sacraments of the holy Roman church." This and similar language, most prudent queen, will the monks and Jesuits doubtless make use of from their pulpits ; for they will let slip no occasion of establishing their superstitions. What else is it then, to re-introduce at this time these filthy vest- ments, and the other rubbish of the popish church into the church of Christ, than to afford an opportunity to the papists, and that a most excellent one, of confirming themselves and their people in their superstitions, and indeed to lend them, as it were, assistance towards this very object? But let us hear the prophet', who said to Jehoshaphat king of Judah when he joined affinity with Ahab, " shouldest thou help the ungodly, and love them that hate the Lord ? therefore is wrath upon thee from before the Lord. " And what else would this thing be, than to turn away the weak from the love of pure religion, and tacitly to recommend them to look back upon and return into Egypt? For a falhng back imto un- godliness is easy to weak men, inasmuch as we are all of us by our very nature inclined to superstitions. So far therefore ought we to be from affording any occasions of relapsing into ungodliness, that they must be altogether removed. What, I pray you, did God mean, when he forbade men " to plough with an ox and an ass to- gether ;" and provided that the same tield should not be sown with divers seeds ; and that men should not wear a garment of woollen and linen together"? It is odious and abominable to God that the same field of the Lord should be tilled by ungodly and godly bishops at the same time ; that in the same church the doctrine of popery be taught at the same time with the doctrine of the gospel ; that, lastly, sacraments, ceremonies and rites made up of apostolic [1 Jehu. See 2 Chron. xix. 2.] [2 These prohibitions arc recorded iu Dcut. xxii. 9 — 11.] 24 2 S72 H. ZANCHIUS TO QUEEN ELIZA OETH. [lET. and popish ones, be brought into use, and the church be clothed with them, as it Avere with a garment made of woollen and linen to- gether. For what agreement hath light with darkness? Such a mingling together, that is, one so abominable and wicked, should also be detested by ourselves. And therefore, the things which are not of God, but of those who have defiled the worship of God, are to be altogether cast oiF ; and this is what the Lord himself com- manded to be done, when he ordered that all the property of those persons who should persuade the people to go after strange gods, should be entirely destroyed, and their raiment, and all their goods burned with fire, and that in the middle of the market-place; namely, to shew his abomination of such seducers, and that they might be accursed of the Lord^ And who does not know that these rai- ments are also included among the goods of the Roman deceiver ? And there shall cleave, he saith, nought of the cursed thing to thine hand, that the Lord may turn from the fierceness of his anger, and multiply thee as he hath sworn unto thy fathers ? '"* What else then, is the introducing these garments, the ornaments of antichrist, into the church of Christ, but provoking the Lord to anger, and kindling his wrath against us? We may be well assured that no true friend of Christ will ever entertain the orna- ments of antichrist in his own house, much less bear them in the church of Christ. For who would endure his enemy's coat of arms in his house, and especially in the most honourable place ? And if God will have any thing to be destroyed and abolished, who are we, that we dare to set it up afresh ? But God, after the death of Christ, would have all the Aaronic and Levitical vestments abolished ; and in our time he has every where declared with suf- ficient clearness, that is, he would have all the ungodly and vain popish ceremonies, pomps, impostures, and trickeries chased away by the splendour of the gospel ; inasmuch as they are of no avail towards the kindhng of godliness, but tend very much to the extin- guishing of it. Nor indeed am I able to perceive what is the ultimate object proposed by these vestments, unless it be in fact, (to come now to another head) to disgrace and dishonour the beautiful face, yea, the whole body of that church of England reformed accord- ing to the gospel; just as if a modest and honourable daughter of some king, were to be clothed in the raiment Avherewith some notorious and well-known harlot was wont to be attired, and thus arrayed, compelled to go forth in pubhc. But who would approve of this, or think such a thing to be endured ? Wherefore, even if [1 ScoDcut. xiii. 12, &c.] CLVllI.] II. ZANCHIUS TO (iUEEN ELIZABETH, 373 for no other reason, at least on this account, vestments of this kind ought not to be obtruded upon the church of Christ ; because the Roman harlot has abused them, though not evil in their own nature, and still continues to abuse them to evil, and to conceal her har- lotries, or rather to allure men to commit fornication. For all these pomps and popish ceremonies are nothing else but meretricious adornments, contrived for the purpose of alluring men to spiritual fornication. Is it not then a shameful thing, to have them in the church of Christ ? If the brasen serpent which had been ordained by God, and that too for the healing of the Israelites, was taken away by the godly king Ilezekiah, because the Israelites abused it con- trary to the word of God ; and if Ilezekiah was greatly commended for this act, namely, for having reduced that serpent to ashes, and commanding them to be cast into running water, that there might remain no vestige of it whatever ; how much rather are these im- pure garments, which the apostles never used, but which are adopted by the Roman harlot in her idolatrous worship, and for the seduction of mankind, to be banished from the church of God ? Nor indeed is it decent, that things which have been long made use of to the dishonour of God, even if they be in themselves indifferent, should be retained in the church to the peril even of the salvation of godly persons. Much less then is this kind of vestment, which is nothing else than an invention of man, or rather of Satan, devised for the seduction of the simple. There is none of us who is ignorant of the commendation deserved by those states which provide by law against their citi- zens wearing strange apparel, and will not introduce them into the commonwealth, because they are the corrupters of good and pure morals, and therefore of the commonwealth themselves. How then can the proposal which is made to your majesty ever be com- mended ; namely, that vestments unknown to the christian com- monwealth in the time of the apostles and their immediate succes- sors, should be introduced into the church of Christ? For if a strange mode of apparel be not tolerated in well constituted states, how much less are idolatrous and gentile garments to be endured in the church, where God is to be worshipped in spirit and in truth, and Avhere he requires but few ceremonies, and those of the most simple character? If too, God has provided by law that the woman should not wear the garments of the man, nor, conversely, the man wear those of the woman, because both of these things are in them- selves shameful and unseemly, and contrary to nature ; why then must godly bishops and servants of Christ be attired, or rather do- 374 H. ZANCHIUS TO QUEEN ELIZABETH. []lET. graded and deformed in the habits of the ungodly mass-priests and bond-slaves of antichrist ? Why should we not rather, as we are of a different religion, be distinguished from them also by external signs, such as the vestments are, at least in the performance of those duties which appertain to the worship of God ? God cer- tainly willed this, and required it of his people that they should be distinguished from the profane gentiles even by a different kind of dress ; and thus he declared by this public sign, that he would not let them have any thing in common with the gentiles. And why should not we also do the same ? Are we not the people of God ? Does not the justice of the same precept still remain ? and if what is honest is so called from honour, what honour, I ask, would it be to the church of Christ to have their bishops in the ministry of the gospel and sacraments attired and masked in the disguise of popery, so as to be rather objects of ridicule to all, than of veneration to the people ? And in what kind of honour will your most serene majesty be held by true churches and true believers, when you allow such fooleries to be reintroduced into your church ? It is not therefore becoming, that godly bishops should be compelled to take up such masks. Nor indeed is the thing itself either worthy of honour and commendation, or does it deserve the name of virtue. For, suppose your most serene majesty were to issue and decree, that every Englishman should lay aside his ancient dress, most grave and decent as it is, and put on the Turkish robe, or array himself in a military dress, as they call it : who, I ask, would commend such a decree as a proper one ? Much less then is it to be commended, that godly bishops be required, having laid aside or at least altered that ancient and becoming attire, which was used even by the apo- stles, namely, a common dress, but decent and becoming, to put on the ridiculous and execrable garments of the ungodly mass-priests. And as it respects the third part of the kingly office, no- thing can be better devised than a plan of this kind, to disturb the public peace. For all novelties, in rehgion especially, either, if evil, disturb the peace of themselves ; or, if harmless, afford accidental occasion for men to contend with each other, the evil namely with the good. But as in things which are good in themselves, as for instance, in the reformation of the churches accordino- to the will of God, the disturbing of an ungodly peace, that is, of the world, is to be disregarded ; (for Christ came not by his preaching to preserve such a peace, but rather to destroy it, and send a sword,) so assuredly, to disturb the peace of the churches, and to set the good and bad, or even the good only at variance with each other, by insisting upon CrVIir.] H. ZANCHIUS TO QUEEN ELIZABETH. 375 things indifferent, is a thing so evidently unjust, as to admit of no defence ; wherefore, on this ground it was that Irenaeus rebuked V^ictor the Roman bishop, as has been above stated. For in such cases the churches must of necessity be split into factions, than which what can be more injurious ? The instances which every where occur in ecclesiastical histories confirm openly and clearly enough what I say. How many and how great disturbances, I pray, were stirred up in the primitive church between those who in addition to the gospel, urged also the observance even of circumcision and of the law, and those who very properly rejected them ? And what mischiefs would this dispute have farther occasioned to the church of Christ, unless the apostles had met the evil in time, by assembling the synod at Jerusalem, and taking due cognizance and consideration of the matter by the plain testimony of the scriptures, and valid reasoning ? If your most serene majesty, as it is your duty, desires both to be and to appear apostolic, you must imitate the apostles in this respect. Neither must you impose this yoke upon the necks of the disciples of Christ yourself, nor allow it to be imposed on them by others. And if you perceive that the bishops disagree among themselves upon this subject, you should call a synod, and take care that the controversy be determined and judged of by the scriptures ; and then at length whatever may have been proved upon clear evidence, and solid grounds, you should set it forth for the observance of all parties, and order it to be observed by act of parliament, and so remove all contention from the church. For it is your most serene majesty's especial duty to provide that no change or innovation shall be made in religion, except according to the word of God. By these means the true peace, and concord, and unity of the churches will be preserved. But should the contrary take place, what else will be the result than the destruction of unity, and the disturbance of christian peace ? Nor do I think that I ought to pass over in silence, that by this novelty not only will the public peace be disturbed in that kingdom, but also elsewhere out of the kingdom will an occasion be afforded to many persons of stirring up new contentions in the churches ; and that not without great injury to godliness, and hindrance of the course of the gospel. For no one is ignorant, that almost all the churches which have de- serted the Roman pontiff for the sake of the gospel, not only do not adopt such vestments, but even regard them with abomination. Not however but that there are others, though very few in com- parison with the former, who still retain those vestments that were made use of in popery, just as they obstinately retain some other 876 H. ZANCHIUS TO QUEEN ELIZABETH. [lET. things ; and that for this reason, because at the iirst, the reformers of those churches, great men in other respects, and most faithful servants of God, did not dare, (nor indeed did they judge it ex- pedient,) entirely to take away every thing that was papistical. But, as is always the case, every one is in love with his own plans. And I call his own, not so much what each has devised of himself, as also what every one makes choice of, receives, retains, adopts for himself, when it has been devised by others. But when the examples of others are brought forward, they become more and more confirmed in those things, and not only confirmed, but also use all their endeavours, and by their speeches, and writings, yea, their hands and feet they leave no stone unturned so that they may bring every one else into their way of thinking. We easily perceive then what will be the consequence, if your most serene majesty should adopt that counsel, which is recommended to you by I know not whom, about the adoption of the vestments and other things pertaining to popery. For some evil disposed persons, stirred up by your majesty's example, will write aud disperse throughout all Germany httle treatises upon these things which they call adia- phoristic ; namely, that it is allowable to introduce them ; yea, and that they must of necessity be admitted, to the end that the papists may be less estranged from us, and that we may thus come more nearly to an agreement with each other. As if the papists, even though we were to allow all these things for the sake of peace, would ever alter any doctrine, and banish from their churches, or by any other means lay aside their false and impious dogmas, then' open and abominable superstitions and mad idolatries. Thus there will not be wanting those who will reply to such books, should they be dispersed ; so that from this flame, kindled in England, will arise also a new con- flagration in Germany and France, on which the papists will throw cold water. An excellent benefit in truth ! Who then does not now perceive that this design has no other object than the general un- settling of churches? On the whole, that golden saying of some learned man is most true and certain and confirmed by long ex- perience, "that matters of indifference, that is, the question respecting matters of indifference, is the golden apple of discord." And thus have I said enough with respect to the disturbance of the public peace. But what shall I say of the consciences of individual bchevers ? The dispute itself teaches us that they arc disturbed beyond measure by the order about wearing the linen surplice. For their complaints are so vehement that their que- rulous lamentations and groans penetrate mto and arc heard CLVIII.] H. ZANCIIIUS TO QUEEN ELIZABETH. S77 even in Germany. And holy scripture informs us how grievous an offence it is and hateful to God, to disquiet the consciences of the godly ; partly, when it commands us not to grieve the holy Spirit, nor to offend the weak ; and partly, v^hen it denovmces heavy punishments upon those who make no scruple of doing these things ; and partly too, when it proposes the examples of the saints, and of Paul especially, who thus speaks, " If meat make my brother to offend, I will eat no flesh while the world standeth, lest I make my brother to offend." (1 Cor. viii, 13.) For in these words he affords by his example a general rule taken from the doctrine of Christ ; namely, that nothing indifferent is to be admitted, much less enforced upon others, and still less commanded by act of parliament if in admitting, enforcing, or commanding it the con- sciences of the faithful are offended. For a tender and God- fearing conscience is a most precious tiling, and very acceptable to God. How then can we approve the design of setting forth by royal mandate a law respecting wearing the sacerdotal vestments in the ministry ? For, to comprehend many things in few words, if vestments of this kind are to be proposed to the faithful, they must either be proposed as indifferent, or essential. If the latter, we act ungodlily, in making those things necessary, that Christ would have free ; if the former, they must then be left free to the churches. For by commanding and enforcing them we make them essential instead of free, and thus fall into the same offence. Then again, they arc either instituted of God by Moses ; or delivered by Christ, to wit, God manifest in the flesh ; or ordained by the holy Spirit acting and speaking in the apostles ; or else by men, either godly or un- godly. The ceremonies and Levitical vestments which were in- stituted of God by Moses, were all of them by the will of God to eease upon the death of Christ ; as is every where evident from the scriptures, especially from the epistles of Paul to the Colossians and Hebrews. For which reason they cannot be restored without a transgression of the divine will. It cannot be said that they were deUvered by Christ, since there is not a word extant upon this sub- ject; but rather on the contrary he plainly taught more than once that the end of all the Mosaic ceremonies had arrived. I assert and affirm the same respecting the apostles. It remains therefore, that they must be allowed to have been ordained of men. If of godly men, they were either ordained by them to edification, or order, or decency. But now they neither tend to edification, that is, to the advancement of godUncss, but rather on the contrary make for its overthrow, as we have before seen : neither do they S'rS H. ZANCHIUS TO QITREN Rf.IZARETH. [lET. tend to any good order, but rather to disorder ; for by their means godly bishops arc confounded with ungodly ones ; whereas it is fitting that they should be distinguished from each other, even by their dress : nor lastly, do they add to the comeliness of the spouse of Christ ; as has been proved by me a little before. They ought not therefore to be allowed by us. And as to what has been devised by men destitute of the Spirit of God, with that we have nothing to do. Lastly, the apostles did not use these vestments. For we have no authentic evidence that they did. But the church, as in doctrine, so also in ceremonies and vestments, is to be framed after the model of the apostolic church. To what end therefore are these vestments in the church ? By whose authority can they be defended ? What benefit or salutary use can accrue from them to the christian people ? But it has been proved by us on the con- trary, that godliness is weakened by them ; the pure worship of God violated ; popish superstition gradually restored ; the godly offended ; the ungodly confirmed in their ungodliness ; the weak in faith thrown into peril of their salvation ; occasions afforded of much mischief; monks and other popish preachers aided in confirming their people in superstition ; God's wrath provoked against us ; those things that God would have destroyed again set up amongst us ; the whole face of the church defiled and disgraced ; decent laws respecting the not wearing strange garments shamefully broken, and thus the whole church dishonoured. Besides this, the public peace of the church, yea, of many churches, is disturbed ; bishops are brought into collision with each other ; the consciences of the godly are burdened, and the feelings of excellent persons offended ; the Holy Spirit in them is grieved, and lastly, the apple of discord is thrown, as it were, upon the table of the gods. Since these things are so, most serene queen, not I only, but all my colleagues and all godly persons suppliantly entreat your most serene majesty, and implore you by Jesus Christ, who we are persuaded is loved by your most serene majesty from your heart, not to carry into effect that design respecting which so much has been said, nor lend your ears to such advisers. For indeed, most pious queen, these counsels are neither for the benefit of your church and kingdom, nor arc they consistent with the honour of your majesty : since they neither tend to the advancement of godli- ness, nor to the preservation of ecclesiastical propriety, nor the maintenance of public peace ; but rather weaken most exceedingly all these excellent things, which your majesty ought most especially to maintain. Your majesty should rather consider, and should CLVIII.] H. ZANCHIUS TO QUEEN ELIZABETH. 379 employ all yom* consideration, authority, and influence to this end, that you may have in the first place bishops truly pious, and well instructed in sacred learning, as by the blessing of God you already possess very many, and should encourage and attend to them. You should then take care that they diligently perform their duty ; watch over the flock ; teach sound doctrine ; refute heresies ; drive away the wolves ; keep every one to his duty, and exhort, incite, and stimulate all persons to a life becoming a christian man. The elders in like manner and deacons are to be admonished that every one be diligent in his office, and should there be occasion, they must be compelled by the authority of your serene majesty ; that neither the former by their slumbering or connivance allow the reins of licentiousness and carnal desires to be relaxed ; nor the latter, from a too great regard for their own concerns, neglect the poor members of the church, and omit other duties pertaining to their office. For these three orders of men are the nerves of the church, upon which its safety or downfall depends. Moreover, your most serene majesty must use your endeavours, and that most dihgently, that the universities, and good and pious professors in them, may be encouraged, cherished, liberally maintained and pro- vided for. For these are as the mothers and nurses of the churches^ in which and by whom those persons are disciplined, taught, edu- cated, and adorned, who shall be called forth some time hence as being qualified to govern and direct the churches. Lastly, as those things which will not admit of correction by the word and by ecclesiastical discipline, must necessarily be cut ofl' and removed by the sword of the magistrate, according to the word of God ; pro- vision must be made herein also by your most serene majesty, in case, for instance, of adulteries, blasphemies, and other capital offences of the like nature. For to this end is the sword committed to the magistrate by God, that ungodly deceivers, obscene profli- gates, and unquiet men, being restrained, the rest may be able to lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty. To this end, most serene queen, you must labour, to this end must your thoughts, your counsels, your strength and power, bo directed; namely, to say all in one word, that we all, " denying ungodliness and worldly lusts, may live soberly, righteously, and godly in this present world." For this is the true and most beautiful garment of all, respecting which every one ought to be anxious ; namely, that having put off the old man with his deeds, we may put on the new man, that is, our Lord Jesus Christ. Nor are there any other true ornaments that become christian bishops than those which the 380 H. ZANCHIUS TO QUEEN ELIZABETH. [lET. apostle hcas blended together, writing and speaking to Timothy and even to Titus, that " a bishop must be blameless, the husband of one wife ; vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach ; not given to Avine, no strilcer, not greedy of filthy lucre; but patient, not a brawler, not covetous, one that ruleth well his own house, having his children in subjection with all gravity " [1 Tim. iii. 2 — 4] ; " not self-willed, not soon angry, not given to wine, just, holy," &c. [Tit. i. 7.] For the garments and ornaments of the Aaronic priest were types of these true ornaments : they were the shadow, these the substance. Let them therefore be removed, and let these be introduced ; and we shall then at last have not only the bishops, but the whole church, truly adorned. I again supphantly entreat your most serene majesty, that altogether laying aside all this consideration about external gar- ments, you will apply your mind to the retaining, putting on, de- fending, these true and spiritual ornaments in the churches. And may your most serene majesty, as I said at the beginning, pardon with your wonted clemency my boldness in writing. May our Lord Jesus Christ long preserve your most serene majesty in safety and happiness to us and to the whole church ! Heidelberg, Sept. 10, 1571. [H. Zanchius.] CLIX. ARCHBISHOP GRINDAL TO H. BULLINGER. LA 100.] BisHOPSTHORPE, Jan. 25, 1572. Health in Christ. Your letter dated 25 Feb. 1571, I did not l-eceive till the 25th of last August. I received also at the same time the MS. refutation of the pope's bull, and a Keply to the "Testament of Brentius." I wonder that Brentius would leave so •virulent a will behind him. Your reply is moderate and pious. The refutation of the bull is printed both in English and Latin, and you have, I beheve, received some copies of the impression before this time. I thank you for your pious anxiety with respect to our churches. You shall learn, in a few words, the state jof my affairs after my translation to this diocese. On the 1st of August, 1570, I left London ; two days after I was seized on my journey with a tertian ague arising from fatigue, (for during my residence in London, I had not been accustomed to riding on horseback ;) on which account I was forced to rest ten days in the midst of my journey. At length CLIX.] ARCHBISHOl' GRINDAL TO H. BULUNGER. 881 on the I7th of August I arrived at Cawood^ (where I have a palace on the banks of the Ouse, about seven miles from the city,) my fever, as the event proved, not being sufficiently cured ; for I was seized on the second of September following with another very severe and acute fever, which weakened me to such an excess, that not only my physicians and friends despaired of my recovery, but I myself also received the sentence of death in myself. But the Lord, who killeth and maketh alive, restored me at length after six months to my former health, the violence of the disorder gradually decreasing, yet so as I was not able to leave my chamber the whole winter. Since then I have laboured to the utmost of my power, and still continue to do, in the visitation of my province and diocese, and in getting rid of those remaining superstitions^ which have maintained their place more firmly in this part of the country, suf- fering as it does under a dearth of learned and pious ministers. After the suppression of the late rebellion I find the people more complying than I expected, as far as external conformity is con- cerned : the reason is, that they have been sufficiently distressed, and therefore humbled, by those calamities wliich are always the [1 This place was the residence of the archbishops of York, havino- been given by king Athelstan to Wulstan, the fifteenth archbishop ; and where they had a magnificent palace, or castle, in which several of the prelates lived and died, and in which cardinal Wolsey was arrested by the earl of Northumber- land on a charge of treason, in the reign of Henry VIII. This castle was dis- mantled, and in part demolished, at the conclusion of the parliamentary war ; since which time, being abandoned by the archbishops, it has remained in a state of gradual dilapidation, and has nearly fallen into ruin. Lewis's Topogr. Diet.] [2 In his letter wi-itten to the secretary, August 29 [1570,] he says, "they keep holidays and fasts abrogated ; they offer money, eggs, &c. at the burial of their dead; they pray beads, &c. so as this seems to be as it were an- other church, rather than a member of the rest." Strj^pe, Grindal, 243. Other popish customs then prevalent in the north were, the frequent use and veneration of crosses, month's minds, obits and anniversaries, the chief intent whereof was praying for the dead ; the superstitions used in o-oino- the bounds of the parishes ; morris-dancers and minstrels comino- into the church in service-time, to the disturbance of God's worship ; puttin"' the con- secrated bread into the receivci-'s mouth, as among the papists the priest did the wafer; crossing and breathing upon the elements in the celebration of the Lord's supper and elevation ; oil, tapers, and spittle in the other sacrament of baptism; pauses and intermissions in reading the services of the church; praying Ave Marias and Pater-nosters upon beads ; setting up candles in the churches to the Virgin Mary on Candlemas-day, and the like. Strype, Grindal, 251.] 882 ARCHBISHOP GRINDAL TO H. BULLINGER. [lET. concomitants of civil war. I wish I had found them as well in- structed in the true religion, as I left my flock in London and Essex to my successor. But yet I hope that, with the Lord giving the increase, much may be effected in time even here. The Lord [Bishop] of Durham, who is in constant ill health, has lately been dangerously ill, but through the mercy of the Lord is now recovered. The excellent Bishop Jewel, of Sahsbury, (the jewel and singular ornament of the Church, as his name implies,) we lost, or rather I should say, sent before us, about the beginning of Octo- ber' last. It is not, as I am well aware, from a feeling of curiosity, but, as you say, from other most important reasons, that you are anxious for information concerning our affairs ; just as we are desirous of hearing about yours, whatever they may be : for we are members of the same body. I hope therefore that, as our affairs are now settled, I shall in future write to your reverence twice at least in every year, and as usual at each of the Frankfort fairs. Matters here are at present, through the great mercy of God, tolerably quiet : however, at the end of last summer, no one suspecting anything of the kind, we were in the greatest danger, as you may probably conjecture from a document inclosed in this letter, and both pub- lished in our language in the form of a letter, and translated into Latin. The daughter of the Guises, who calls herself the queen of Scotland, is now consigned to closer custody-. Thomas duke of [1 He died Sept. 23, 1571.] [2 She was removed from Tutbuiy to Sheffield castle in August 1569. The following document, copied from the original in the Cottonian Library, will shew the nature of the restrictions under which she was placed. ORDERS FOR THE QUEEN's HOUSEHOLD. "To the Mr. of the Scottis queene's household. First, that all youi' people well, appertayneth to the queene shall depart from the qvieene's chamber, or chambers, to their own lodging at ix of the clock at night, win- ter and summer, whatever he or she, either to their lodging within the house, or without in the towne, and there to remain till the next day at vi of the clock. "Item, that none of the queene's people shall at no time weare his sword, neither within the house nor when her grace rydcth or goeth abroade, unless the master of the household himself to weare a sword, and no more, without my special licence. "Item, that there shall none of the queene's people carry any bow or shaftes at no tyme, neither to the field nor to the butts, unless it be foure or fyvc, and no more, being in the queene's company. "Item, that none of the queene's people shall rydo or go at no tyme abroad out of the house, or towne, without my special licence ; and if he or CLIX.] ARCHBISHOP GRINDAL TO H. BULLINGER. 383 Norfolk was brought to triaP on the 16th of this month, and con- demned to death for high treason : but whether the sentence will shortly be put into execution, my distance from court prevents me from knowing''. Other accomplices in the same conspiracy are now in custody, and will undergo a like sentence. Scotland has been sorely distressed the whole of this year with intestine commotions. For after the death of the regent James, the grandfather^ of the young king was elected in his room. About a year ago he made an unexpected attempt upon the well fortified castle of Dumbarton at the mouth of the Clyde, ivhich he took in the night-time by means of scaling ladders, having first killed the sentinels ; and he compelled the archbishop of St Andrew's, whom he found there, and who was a natural brother of the duke of Ha- milton, to put an end to his life by hanging ". In revenge for this, about the beginning of last May, the Hamiltons with three hundred horse entered by night the town of Stirling, and there put to death on the spot the new regent^, whom they seized in his chamber. they so doth, they or he shall come no more in at the gates: neither in the towne, whatsoever he, she, or they may be. "Item, that you, or some of the queene's chamber, when her grace will walk abroad, shall advertise the officier of my wardc, who shall declare the messuage to me one houer before she goeth forth. "Item, that none of the queene's people, whatsoever he or they be, not one at no time, to come forth of their chamber or lodging when any alarum is given by night or dale, whether they be in the queene's chambers within the house, or without in the towne; and giff he or they keep not their chambers or lodging wheresoever, that he or they shall stand at their perill for death. At Shefeild, the 26 dale of April, 1571, per me, SUREWSBURIE."] [3 In Westminster Hall upon the judgment-seat sate George Talbot, earl of Shrewsbury, constituted Lord High Steward of England for that day. There were besides 25 peers present, by whom the duke was unanimously found guilty of the high treasons wherewith he stood arraigned. See below, note 3, p. 399; and Camden's Eliz. p. 170, &c. where is given a full account of the proceedings.] [^ The queen was very reluctant to order the duke of Norfolk's execution. Randolph writes on March 21st, to the bishop of Dm-ham, "I feare that the bishop of Lincoln's words in his sermone before her majestic will prove true, alleged out of Augustine, that there was misericordia puniens, a-iidelitas parcens, in consyderatiou whereof gi-eat evil dyd ensue." MS. Lansd. 13. 22. He was, however, at length executed on the 2nd of June, on a scaffold erected on Tower-hill. See Camden, Elizabeth, p. 177.] [5 Matthew Stuart, earl of Lenox, and father of lord Darnley.] [6 See note 5, p. 363.] [7 Lord Burghley gives, in a letter to Thomas Smith, dated Sept. 8th, 1574, S8'l? AKcnnisiiop grindal to h. nuLLiNGcn. [let. The earl of Mar^ was chosen by the king's party in his room ; a good man, but not possessing much influence. The Scots there- fore, divided into many factions as well public as private, are at- tacking each other with mutual violence. The queen's party have seized upon the town and castle of Edinburgh. The king's ad- herents have fortified the neighbouring harbour of Leith, and strengthened it with a garrison. The regent James had given the command of the castle of Edinburgh to one Kirkaldy^, as being most faithful to himself and most hostile to the queen : this man, not long after, during the regent's lifetime, bribed probably with French gold, went over to the queen. This defection was the cause of all the mischief; for the queen''s party would otherwise have found no safe position whence to carry on the war. However, we hope that our queen will shortly put an end to these calamities. For if matters cannot be settled by the conference and treaty of peace which is now in progress, there is no doubt but that our queen m\\ become the enemy of that party which shall refuse to accept of such fair terms as shall be offered ; in which case the other party will of necessity be forced to submit. I wrote to Richard Hilles to send some crowns to Julius. I will bear Butler in my favourable recollection. If he will learn our language, he may some time or other become a minister in our church. I send you together with this letter a history lately pub- lished by George Buchanan, a Scotsman, respecting the virtues of the queen of Scotland''. May the Lord Jesus very long preserve the following account of his death : '' On monday last, two hundred and forty horsemen, a hundred footemen, all of the castle of Edenborough, stole to Sterling towne, which they entered quietly, and tooke the regente and all the lords of his present, in their beds, and when they wore carrying them away, their soldyers fell to spoyle, and a power of the castle of Styrling issuing out rescued them all, and slew their takers ; but in this fight the regent was hm-t, and by some advertisements I hear that he is dead." MS. Cott. Calig. c. III. 227. In another letter from Burghley to the earl of Shrewsbury, dated Sept. 13, he writes, "It is true that the erle of Lenox, late regent, was slain after that he was taken, by commandment of Claud Hamilton, and he that killed hym named Cakler, who hath confessed it. "] [1 "The erle of Marr is confirmed regent by parlement at Sterling, where- to the erles of Argile, Eglinton, Cassels, and Crawford, with the lords Boyd, and St. Colme, have sworne and subscribed." Burghley to lord Shrewsbury, Sept. 13, as above.] [2 Sir William Kirkaldy of Grange. See note 7, p. 292. He was after- wards executed.] [3 The book referred to is entitled, "De Mai'ia regina Scotorum, totaquo ejus contra regem conjuratione," &c. It was dedicated to queen Elizabeth.] CLIX.] ARCHBISHOP GRINDAL TO H. BOLLINGER. 385 your reverence ! Bishopsthorpe, near York, 25 Jan. 1752. Your most devoted in the Lord, Edmund York. I was just about to seal this, when I received your letter and that of Gualter, in which you recommend to me your nephew, and he his son. I am far distant from our universities } I will write however to my friends that they may recommend them. I hear that the lord bishop of London has sent them to Cambridge, and sup- plied them with means : I too will sometimes assist them with money, which is all I can do. Salute, I pray you, master Gualter in my name, to whom I have not now leisure to reply. I suspect that the anonymous little book you sent me was written by our bishop of Sahsbury of pious memory ; but I have no reason for this con- jecture except from the style and manner of writing. Once more farewell, my very dear and reverend brother in Christ. Edmund York. CLX. R. ZUINGLIUS* TO BISHOP SANDYS. [B. 76.] Cambridge, 2f> Jan. 1572. As master Shepherd^, the most worthy master of our college, has expressed his intention of paying you a visit, I did not think, reverend father in Christ, that I could do otherwise than send a letter to your eminence, to thank your eminence for your especial kindness and extreme liberality tov/ards me and mine ; and at the same time to make known to your eminence, and that very briefly, the state of my affairs. For it is not fit that you, who are occupied with cares and engagements of far greater importance, should waste much of your labom' and time in reading what I have to say. Xor indeed does my situation in hfe, or rather my lowness of condition, justify my detaining your eminence by a lengthened statement. To despatch the matter therefore in few Avords, I return you, reverend bishop, my warmest thanks for your singular good-will and favour towards me ; and especially for the godly care and ex- ertions you have bestowed upon the advancement of my studies, [* This Rodolph Zuinglius was Bullinger's grandson. See below, JiCtter CLXIII. p. 393, n. 2. He died in the June following the date of this letter.] [5 Nicolas Shepherd, chosen master of St John's College in 1569, whom, alluding to his name, the fellows, in their letters to Cecil their patron, styled their noiiieva. Ho was strongly recommended to Cecil by bishop Grindal, (wiiose letter is printed in Strype, Life of Grindal, p. 225,) but was deprived of the mastership in 1576.] 25 386 R. ZUINGLIUS TO BISHOP SANDYS. [lET. and by which you have not only provided me a place in the most flourishing university of Cambridge, but have also procured my ad- mission mto a most famous college, and among sober students : for which singular care of yours on my behalf I thank your eminence to the utmost of my power, and promise on my part, as it is my duty to do, that I will never be ungrateful or unmindful of such great benefits, and that I will evermore proclaim both to my coun- trymen, and especially to my parents, your exceeding hberahty to me ; and ever so conduct myself towards your eminence as a godly young man, and one who is descended from godly parents, should do. In the mean time, however, I would have your eminence know, with respect to my afiairs, that I have obtained, in the college where I was placed by your eminence, a situation sufficiently suitable and convenient for the furtherance of my studies ; for the master has provided me, by his especial kindness, not only with comfortable rooms and sufficient commons, but with a most excellent tutor, of whose advice and assistance I most freely avail myself, both in pro- secuting my studies, and procuring other things that are necessary ; so that I tliink very httle will be wanting towards the prosecution of my studies. And I rejoice, not so much on my own account, as for the sake of my studies, that I have the means and opportunity afforded me of hearing that most famous and learned man, master Antony Chevaher^ to whom our Germany can scarce produce an equal in the knowledge of Hebrew, or one who can bear a comparison with him, except Immanuel TremeUius", whom I heard lecturing most ably at Heidelberg in the Palatinate, and from whose lectui'es, I think, I derived no small advantage; nor do I think, the Lord giving his grace, that I shall profit less by those of this professor. But whatever benefit I may derive from these or any other lectures, I ascribe all to your eminence, by whose singular hberahty it has been brought to pass and provided, that I have not only the means of subsistence in the most celebrated university of Cambridge, but also the convenience and liberty afforded me of hearing the most learned professors, by whose assistance I hope to make no small progress in my studies. But in the mean time, not to proceed to an unbecoming prohxity, I commend myself to your eminence, and would entreat the continuance of your protection and patronage ; [1 See above p. 174, n. 1.] [2 John Immanuel Trcmellius was a converted Jew, and succeeded Fagius as Hebrew professor at Cambridge in 1550. He was afterwards professor at Heidelberg, and published in 1575, in concert with Francis Junius, a Latin version of the Old Testament,] CLX.] R. ZUINGLIUS TO BISHOP SANDYS. S87 and that you will take these few lines in good part, as a slight testimony of my respect to your eminence. May our good and gracious God long keep your eminence in health and safety, and deign to preserve you to his church ! Your eminence's most devoted, PtODOLPH ZuiNGLius, of Zurich. Cambridge, Jan. 26, 1572. CLXI. BISHOP COX TO R. GUALTER. [A. 94.] Ely, Feb. 12, 1572. The copy of the letter, most learned Gualter, and very dear brother in Christ, which you wrote to the bishop of Norwich, was forwarded to me very late, namely in September, 1570. It treats in a cursory manner of some ceremonies of rehgion in England, and of some of our brethren who disapprove of them. We are per- suaded that you are one who entertain a pious and sincere regard for us, and for that pure rehgion of Christ which we profess. I wish indeed you had not lent so ready an ear to a few of our some- what factious brethren. And it were to be desired that a man of your piety had not so freely given an opinion, before you had fully understood the rise and progress of our restoration of rehgion in England. There was formerly pubhshed by command of King Edward of pious memory, and with the advice and opinion of those excellent men, master Bucer^, and master Peter Martyr, then residing in England, a book of common prayer* and sacraments for [3 After Bucer's perusal of the book, he gave his judgment in general : "that in the description of the communion and daily prayers, he saw nothing enjoined in the book but what was agreeable to the word of God, either in word, as in the Psalms and lessons ; or in sense, as the collects. Also, that the manner of their lessons and prayers, and the times of using them, were constituted very agreeable both with God's word, and the observation of the ancient churches ; and therefore that that book ought to be retained and vin- dicated with the greatest strictness. " Strypo, Life of Cranmer, 300. Peter Martyi-'s opinions upon the Liturgy coincided in all respects with those of his friend Bucer. The particular animadversions they both made upon it may found in Soames's Hist, of the Reformation, Vol. m. chap. 6. See also Bucer, Scripta Anglicana.] [4 A committee of bishops and other learned divines, of whom Dr Cox, then dean of Christ Church, was one, was appointed in 1547, the ftret of King Edward VI. to compose " an uniform order of communion, according to the rules of Scripture, and the use of the primitive church." And the same persons, in the following year, being empowered by a new commission, in a 25—2 388 BISHOP cox TO R. GUALTER. [l.ET. the use of the church of England. But now, as soon as our illus- trious queen Elizabeth had succeeded to the kingdom, she re- stored this holy little book^ to the church of England, Avith the highest sanction of the whole kingdom. At that time no office or function of religion was committed to us who now preside over the churches ; but when we were called to the ministry of the churches, we embraced that book with open arms, and not without thanks to God who had preserved for us such a treasure, and restored it to us in safety. For we know that this book ordains nothing contrary to the word of God. It will not be foreign to the subject to state what master Peter Martyr of pious memory wrote to us when exiles at Frankfort. "I find nothing," he says, speaking of this book, "in that book contrary to godliness. We know that some contentious men have cavilled at and calumniated it. Such persons ought rather to have remembered that our Lord is not a God of contention, but of peace." Had you been aware of these circumstances, master Gualter, you would not have been so alarmed, as you say you are, lest after the imposition of the habits some greater evil might ensue. The statements indeed, which are whispered in your ears by the contentious, are most absurd : for instance, that besides the habits many other things are to be obtruded on the church ; and that there are some who make an improper use of the name of the queen ; and moreover, that the ministers who refuse to subscribe to the injunctions of certain individuals, are to be turned out of the churches : just as if there were any persons in England who would dare to frame laws by their private authority, and propound them for the obedience of their brethren. But this is not only false, but few months' time finished the whole Liturgy, which was then set forth " by the common agreement and full assent both of the parliament and con- vocations provincial," and is frequently called the first book of Edwai-d VI. But about the beginning of 1551, some exceptions were taken at some things in this book, whereupon Archbishop Cranmer proposed to review it ; and to this end called in the assistance of Martin Bucer and Peter Martyr, who had Latin versions prepared for them, and the book thus revised and altered was again confii-med in Parliament in 1551. It is frequently called the second book of Edward VI. and is very nearly the same with that which we now use. See Bp. Mant's Introduction to his edition of the Book of Common Prayer. Strype, Mem. ii. i. 133, &c. Life of Cranmer, 381.] [1 The differences between the Book of Prayers of King Edward and Queen Elizabeth are few and unimportant. They are stated by Soames, Hist, of Reformation, iv. 674, and Strype, Annals, i. i. 123. See also Bp. Mant's Introduction as above, p. iii. and Keeling, Litiirgioe Britannicce.] CLXI.] BISHOP COX TO R. GUALTER. 389 injurious both to the queen and the ministers of the word, to wit, that we humour her royal highness, and make her more decided in ordering every thing according to her own pleasure. But far be any one from suspecting any thing of the kind in so godly and religious a personage, who has always been so exceedingly scru- pulous in deviating even in the shghtest degree from the laws prescribed. Moreover, she is in the habit of listening with the greatest patience to bitter and sufficiently cutting discourses. Again, far be it that the ministers of the word should be said to have foully degenerated into base flattery. We indeed do not as yet know of any one who has abused either your authority, Gualter, or that of any godly fathers, in approval of the popish dress, which we seriously reject and condemn equally with themselves. Nor is it true that we have obtruded any thing upon our brethren out of the pope's kitchen. The surpHce was used in the church of Christ long before the introduction of popery. But these things are pro- posed by us as having been sanctioned by the laws, not as the papists abused them to superstition, but only for distinction, that order and decency may be preserved in the ministry of the word and sacraments. And neither good pastors nor pious laymen are offended at these things. You seem to take it ill that the bishops were appointed to the management of these matters. Nay, you seem to insinuate, from the parable of Christ, (Matt. xxiv. 49,) that we are perfidious, drunken, and smiters of our fellow-servants ; as if we approved the figments of the superstitious courtiers, and treated the godly min- isters with severity, and exhibited ourselves as the ministers of intemperate rashness. You thought that we should defend the cause of such ministers. These imputations are very hard, and very far from the truth. Has not the management and conservation of ecclesiastical rites, from the very origin of a well-constituted church, been at all times under the especial controul of bishops? Have not the despisers and violators of such rites been rebuked and brought into order by the bishops ? Let the practice of the holy church be referred to, and it will be evident that this is the truth. And it would certainly be most unjust to number those who now discharge the episcopal office, among the perfidious or the drunken. You candidly and truly confess, master Gualter, that there arc some among those brethren who are a little morose ; and you might add too, obstreperous, contentious, rending asunder the unity of a well-constituted church, and every- where handing up and down among the people a form of divine 390 BISHOP cox TO R. GUALTER. [lET. ■worship concocted out of their own heads ; that book, in the mean time, composed by godly fathers, and set forth by lawful authority, bemg altogether despised and trodden under foot. In addition to this, they inveigh in their sermons, which are of too popular a character, against the popish filth and the monstrous habits, which, they exclaim, are the ministers of impiety and eternal damnation. Nothing moves them, neither the authority of the state, nor of our church, nor of her most serene majesty, nor of brotherly warning, nor of pious exhortation. Neither have they any regard to our weaker brethren, who are hitherto smoking like flax, but endeavour dangerously to inflame their minds. These our brethren will not allow us to imitate the prudence of Paul, who became all things to all men, that he might gain some. Your advice, and that especially of the reverend fathers Martin Bucer, Peter Martyr, and Henry BuUinger, can have no weight with these men. We are undeservedly branded with the accusation of not having performed our duty, because we do not defend the cause of those whom we regard as disturbers of peace and rehgion ; and who by the vehemence of their harangues have so maddened the wretched multitude, and diiven some of them to that pitch of frenzy, that they now obstinately refuse to enter our churches, either to baptize their children, or to partake of the Lord's supper, or to hear sermons. They are entirely separated both from us and from those good brethren of ours; they seek bye paths; they establish a private reh- gion, and assemble in private houses, and there perform their sacred rites, as the Donatists of old, and the Anabaptists now; and as also our papists, who run up and down the cities, that they may some- where or other hear mass in private. This indeed is too disgusting, to connect our queen with the pope. Let the pope be sent where he deserves. We must render an account of our function to the queen, as chief magistrate, who does not require any thing that is unreasonable, and also before God. These few things I had, my beloved brother, to notice in your letter, that henceforth you may not believe every spirit ; and that, since God has endowed you with so much learning and piety, you may have regard to your own reputation. These remarks, pro- ceeding from a candid mind, I do not doubt but that you will take with kindness and in good part. Farewell in Christ. From the Isle of Ely in England, Feb. 12, 1571. [1572.] Your brother in Christ, Richard Cox, bishop of Ely. CLXII.J BISHOP COX TO H. BULLINGER. 391 CLXII. BISHOP COX TO H: BULLINGER. [B. 78.] Ely, Febr. 12, 1572, Your letter, my beloved brother in Christ, written on the 20th of August, 1571, was brought me in the month of January last past, by the three young men of whom you make mention in that letter ^ A letter was sent you by me last summer with some copies of a book printed in your name against the pope's bull. Your book indeed, dictated with so much abiHty and truth, and most correctly written, could not but be most acceptable to me and to all godly persons ; and I am bound to confess that we are very much obhged to you for the gift. Moreover, the queen ^ herself has also read your book, and is much gratified. I hope you have long since received^ both a letter from me, and the books, together with some trifling presents ; so that you will fully understand what we have done as to the publishing of your book. And now to come to your letter. With respect to your young men, you may feel quite satisfied ; for the parties to whom you have given them a recommendation will carefully provide for them, with every feeling of friendship and kindly interest. And indeed the zeal, and dihgence, and infinite labours of masters Zuinglius and BuUinger and Rodolph Gualter, in the propagation of true religion and the overthrow of the subtle machinations of false religion, abundantly deserve this. As to your son, since you have especially commended him to the archbishop of York, the bishop of SaUsbury, and myself, we will so undertake the charge of him, as that you need not feel any anxiety about him ; although the bishop of Salis- bury* (which I cannot relate without tears, as he was the treasure of the church of England) departed this life while on the visitation of his diocese, and hath gone from hence to heaven, to his gain in- deed, but to our exceeding and intolerable loss. In the mean time we will not be unmindful either of Gualter's son, or of Butler, whom you so repeatedly commend to me. But, in comphance with your wishes, your two young men are placed at the university of Cambridge, though in different colleges, and in a numerous and learned society. Our affairs, by the great blessing of God, not to say by a \} These were Rodolph Zuinglius, Rodolph Gualter the younger, and Henry Butler.] [2 See above, letter CLIV. p. 352, n. 2.] [3 There is written in the margin of the original letter, in Bullinger's hand. Nihil allatutn est, nihil accept, nee quicquam hicjiis vidi. ] [* Bishop Jewel.] ^ S92 BISHOP cox TO H. BULLINGER. [lET miracle, are in a prosperous condition. The duke of Norfolk lately entered into a secret conspiracy with the papists, and indeed with the pope himself, for the destruction of our most serene queen and her kingdom, nay, for the subversion of the holy gospel of God. But our gracious Lord is always present with his people. The duke was for a long time imprisoned upon suspicion of guilt, and his abandoned wickedness was at length detected. He was brought to trial, and, having been duly convicted, is under sentence of death. The filthy sink of the popish conspirators has at length burst forth. Blessed be the Lord God, who has opportunely brought such wickedness to light ! Now, we hope, all things are settled, except that Satan does not cease to go about and roar, seeking whom he may devour. We must aid each other by our mutual prayers. Master Gualter wrote last year (I think) a letter to my brother Parkhurst, bishop of Norwich ; which, as it occasioned some excite- ment among the men of his way of thinking, who are always planning some innovation or other, and refuse to be subject to the ordinances established in our church, I have thought it right to admonish^ our brother Gualter to be more cautious, lest either in ignorance or without intending it he may seem by his writings to encourage contentions. vShould my expostulation appear too severe, let him consider the feeling from which it has proceeded, certainly from one of good-will and affectionate regard to him. May the Lord Jesus very long preserve you in safety to his church ! From the isle of Ely, hi England, Feb. 12, 1572. / I had almost omitted mention of the treatise you sent me respecting the authority of scripture and of the church. It is a truly precious book, and worthy of being well handled by all godly persons. The papists however do not cease to yelp against it : there are many propositions, they say, which rest upon the au- thority of the fathers and of the church, but not upon that of the scriptures ; of which kind arc the following. Many things necessary to be beheved, which are not in the scriptures : The perpetual virginity of Mary. The Father is uncreate. The Son is consubstantial. The Holy Ghost proceeds from the Father and the Son. Infants are to be baptized. One who is baptized by a heretic according to the form of the church is truly baptized. God is three Persons. [1 Sec the preceding letter.] CLXll.] BISHOP COX TO H. BULLINGER. 393 The apostles were baptized. We use things stranglted, and blood. Christ descended into hell. Water is to be mixed with wine in the cup. Martyrdom supplies the place of baptism. Prayers, oblations, and alms, benefit the dead. No one may be admitted to the Lord's supper before he is baptized. Your brother in Christ, Richard Cox, bishop of Ely. CLXIII. BISHOP SANDYS TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 101.] London, Feb. 17, 1572. Health in Christ. That I have not replied, my very dear brother, and most reverend master, to your frequent letters, I would have you ascribe, not so much to my want of gratitude, as to most troublesome hindrances of various kinds. For to pass over many other things which have prevented this intercourse of regard and accustomed correspondence, the first and most afilictive is this, the extreme violence and extent of my late attack of illness, by which the Lord exercised me so painfully and for so long a time, that I had altogether given up thinking upon these matters. To this must be added a constant accession of business, which the station in which I am now placed daily occasions me, and by which 1 am almost so overwhelmed, that I have no opportunity either for personal relaxation or correspondence with others. In fine, even if sufficient time and leisure were afforded, such is the present unsettled state of affairs, that nothing can be transmitted from us to you; especially since there is so close a blockade both by land and sea, that it is not safe to send letters. I received your last letter at the end of December, and when I had read it, endeavoured, as diligently as I could, to comply with your request In recommending your grandson^ and those other [ 2 Rodolph Zuinglius, Avhoso ftithcr married BuUinger's daughter. He came over to England with a son of Rodolph Gualter, by whom they were recommended to bishop Parkhm-st. With him they were in the beginning of December at Ludham, where, says Strype, ho treated them with oysters, which the yoimg men wondered to see him eat. But however young Gualter ventured at last upon them ; for so the bishop merrily wrote to his tiither : but as for Zuinglius, as the bishop went on, he dared not cum vivis animalibm congredi. Strype, Annals, ii. i. 336.] 394 BISHOP SANDYS TO H. RULLINGER. [lET, friends of yours to the bishop of Norwich, you lighted upon the very man who, while he had the greatest desire to serve you, yet possessed at the same time no means whatever of doing so. For^ having lately entrusted with too great confidence the management of his affairs to men of dishonest character, it has come to pass by their means that he is so overwhelmed with debt, as to be unable to extricate himself from these misfortunes, much less to afford any assistance to others. As to me, however, moved partly by the remembrance of your kindness, and partly because I considered I should be acting acceptably to God, and especially to yourself, I took upon myself the charge of assisting them'. I speedily there- fore took care to send them to the university of Cambridge ; and that they might have a better opportunity of learning both our language and others, I thought it best to place them in different colleges, lest their frequent intercourse should prevent their appli- cation in learning a foreign language. Though indeed I am much distressed by difficulties concerning my income and expenditure, I have nevertheless presented each of them with twenty crowns out my own purse, to diminish the unpleasantness of living in a strange place. In all other respects, as far as my means will permit, I promise that I will not be wanting to them, that they may engage with greater freedom in those studies which may some time or other be of advantage to the church of Christ. For I have always thought it a most excellent thing to soiu a benefit which the flock of Christ may reaj) in due season. I have sent you then* own letters in testimony, not indeed of very great liberahty on my part, yet of my good inclination and regard, that you may learn what I have done more fully from their letters than from my own. I entreat you again and again to salute my friend and very dear brother in Christ, master Rodolph Gualter. May the Lord Jesus [1 The bishop had the misfortune to entrust one [George Thymelthoi-p] with the collection of the tenths of his diocese, who took the sums that he had received of the clergy, and converted them to his own use, instead of paying them into the exchequer. So that at length a heavy debt fell on the poor bishop, for two or three years' arrears of the tenths, that almost broke' his back, and drove him to great necessity. For the revenues of his bishop- ric were obliged to make good his debt to the queen. Which was the reasoa he was fain to absent from Norwich, and live more privately at Ludham, a country seat belonging to the see. Stiype, Annals, ii. i. 330.] [2 From the bishop [of Norwich] they took their journey to London with their letters, and waited upon bishop Sandys there, who received them very obligingly, for their relations' and couutiy's sake ; and assigned each of them £5 against their going to Cambridge. Strype, Annals, ii. i. 336.] CLXIII.] BISHOP SANDYS TO H. BULLINGER. 395 Christ prosper you, and the labours which you undergo for the furtherance of the gospel of Christ ! Dated London in England, 17 Feb. 1572. Your very dear brother in Christ, Edwin Sandys, bishop of London. CLXIV. R. HILLES TO H. BULLINGER [B. 79.] London, Feb. 18, 1572. Much health. Your letter, my much respected friend, written to me on the 23rd of last August, I received two months since by your grandson Rodolph Zuinglius, who, as I understand, is now studying [at Cambridge]. Rodolph Gualter is also pursuing his studies there: they were both of them here in London on the 15th of last De- cember, not long after they had landed in England at Norwich from Embden in East Friesland. The letters you mention they had taken care to deliver in person to some of our very reverend bishops ; that is to say, they first gave master John Parkhurst's letter to himself at Norwich, then the one to the bishop of London, and they afterwards took care that all the rest should be delivered to the bishops to whom you addressed them. But whether your Rodolph has visited the bishop of Ely, and presented your letter to him, I do not know. Moreover on the sixteenth day of December aforesaid your Rodolph and Rodolph Gualter borrowed from me to the amount of eleven florins and eleven batzen, German money, reckoning a florin at fifteen batzen, for their current expenses here jn London, to be repaid by your friend master Christopher Fros- chover at the next Frankfort fair. My son too, Gerson HiUes, .who travelled with them from Frankfort as far as Embden, lent them thirty florins and ^ — batzen of German money, which sum they promised should be repaid at the aforesaid Lent fair to my son Barnabas Hilles, or my servant Robert Mascall, by the same master Froschover ; of which payment (as also of that of the before-mentioned eleven florins and eleven batzen) I entertain no doubt. But yet, as you might understand from the last letter you received from me in October, (as I learn from the letter of master Rodolph Gualter, written to me from Zurich on the sixteenth of the same month,) I wrote to your piety, that it would be more for your interest, (I mean yours and master Gualter's) if you would £3 The word is omitted in the MS] 396 R. HILLES TO H. BULLINGER. [lET* cause to be paid beforehand at Frankfort the money which you ■wish to be credited to the two young men here in England, that I may afterwards pay them the amount in this country. I have received that most dehghtful treatise you sent me on the authority of scripture and of the church, and I thank your kindness for it. Salute, I pray you, in my name master Kodolph Gualter the elder, and tell him that I am obliged to him for having written to me about the appearance in the sun, which was seen by you [at Zurich] on the 29th of September : it may be, as he him- self supposes, that no ordinary example of divine vengeance will at length pursue a guilty and unrepenting world. I am sorry to hear that master Rodolph Gualter was attacked last summer by an acute and burning fever, which brought him so low, that he began to doubt of his recovery. But I rejoice that God has so had com- passion on him, as to restore him to health and to the church at the same time ; so that he can truly say with the holy prophet David after his sickness, / shall not die, hut live, and declare the works of the Lord. Nor do I at all doubt but that whatever money I have now advanced to his aforesaid son Kodolph, to the aforesaid amount, namely, of eleven florins and as many batzen, he will faith- fully cause to be repaid to me at the next Frankfort fair'. And I entreat you, master Bullinger, by the Lord, not to be offended at my thus writing to yourself and master Gualter a joint letter, and not separately to each of you. For it is now-a-days (and I am certainly much ashamed of it) very troublesome to me to write letters in Latin, as I write them so very slowly ; so that I can scarcely now write as many letters in two hours as I could finish, when I was a young man, in half an hour. But blessed be the Lord my God in all things and at all times ; at all times and evermore, whether in prosperity or adversity ! Amen. It would certainly be just that some part at least of their father's property should go to the lawful heirs of John Butler. But as he himself sold all his patrimony in this country, and, according to law and common right of the realm of England, [1 Gualter's son acknowledged a subsequent loan from R. Hilles in the following terms : Chirographa acceptse pecuniae. Ego Rodolphus Gualterus Tigurinus hoc meo chirographo tester me a D. Ricardo Hilles mercatore Londinensi mutuo accepissc summam tredecim florenorum ct quinque bat- zionum Germanicorum, quam quidem summam polliceor me praedicti Ricardi Ilillcs filio Barnaba) Hilles aut famulo Simoni redditurum, aut reddi cura- turum, in nundinis autumnalibus Francofordianis proximo futuris, per D, Christophorum Froschoverum typographum Tigurinum ; in cujus rci gratiam haic propria manu scripsi ct subscripsi. Londini 28 Apr. 1573.] CLXIV.] B. HILLES TO H. BULLINGER. 397 granted and confirmed the same to a native purchaser and his heirs ; or (as our jurisconsults or lawyers are wont barbarously to speak) he assured, and gave seisin, that is, lawful possession ; no hope remains that the heirs of the said John Butler (and especially those born out of England, and of a mother not an Englishwoman) can recover, as our lawyers say, or repossess by the Enghsh law the inheritance that is sold, or any part of it, at least so far as I can learn or understand. Henry Butler must therefore have patience, and in this matter not hope against hope. Since I last wrote to you in the month of August, I have not received any letters either for yourself or master Rodolph Gualter from the reverend the bishops, nor, as I remember, from any other learned men. But if they now wish to write to you by my above- named servant Robert, who is about to sail, God willing, in this present month of February, from hence to Hamburgh, I hope that my son Barnabas will be able safely to convey such letters from Hamburgh for you to the aforesaid master Froschover at Frank- fort. I suppose you have heard that our countryman, the duke of Norfolk, has lately been accused of treason: and on the 16th of January he was publickly condemned to death by the peers of the realm of England, according to the custom of the same realm in taking cognizance of offences of this kind. Among other crimes which I hear he was guilty of, this was one of many, that he sent a large sum of money to one of the two earls- who, two years •since, was a rebel, and took arms against our most serene queen in the north of England. He will shortly, it is said, be beheaded ^ here in London, as he deserves. May God give him grace heartily to repent of his ingratitude and great iniquity that he has com- mitted both against Almighty God and against the queen's majesty! Two men* were lately executed here for their impious crimes, who, [2 The truth of this accusation was proved by the countess of Northuju- .berland's letters, wherein she thanked the duke for the rrioney wherewith he had supplied her husband and her. Camden's Elizabeth, pp. 171, 175.] P The duke was beheaded on Tower Hill, on June 2nd. He was attended on the scaffold by Dr Nowel, dean of St Paul's, and Foxe the martyrologist.] [4 The names of these men were Mather and Beraers, Avho were hired by Borgest, the Spanish ambassador's secretary, to murder Cecil, and the queen also. They were apprehended at the instance of one Herle, their associate, who saved his life by becoming informer, and were executed in February, See Strype, Ann. ii. i. p. 123. Camden, p. 176. For an account of the con- spiracies against Cecil at this period, sec Nares's Memoirs of Lord Burghley, Vol. II. ch. 10, 12.] 398 R. HILLES TO H. BULLINGER. [lET.- among other atrocities, plotted together for the destruction of the Lord William Cecil, baron of Burghley, her majesty's chief secre- tary ; as one of them confessed at the galldws. God by his provi- dence brought the whole matter to light, before that abominable wickedness was carried into effect. Farewell, and may Almighty God very long preserve you to the advancement of his glory and the edifying of his church ! London, Feb. 18, 1572. Yours, you know who, Hilles, merchant. CLXV. BISHOP PARKHURST TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 102.] LuDHAM, March 10, 1572. Your most learned refutation of the pope's bull is in the hands of every one ; for it is translated into Enghsh, and is printed at London. You have done well in replymg with so much diligence to the stupid and furious Testament of Brentius. Those three' troublesome preachers in the Dutch Church [at Norwich] have been silenced, and two others appomted in their stead. Seventeen members of the same church were banished from our city on the first of November, for the disgraceful vice of drunk- enness. About the middle of December the Spanish ambassador^ was ordered to depart from England within three days, on pain of losing his head. This intelligence some friend wrote to me from London ; but I know not whether it is correct. At all events he has left the kingdom ; abiit, excessit, evasit. The duke of Norfolk pleaded his own cause in Westminster Hall, on the 16 th January, from seven in the morning till night. There are many charges of treason against him, wliich he refuted as well as he could. The entire cognizance and jurisdiction in this \} Their names were Antonius, Theophilus, and Isbrand Balkius. The last was soon afterwards appointed minister of the strangers* church at Stamford. Strype, Parker, ii. 84, 149.] [2 This proceeding was occasioned by the discovery of some letters of the queen of Scots, importing that " she gave herself, and her son, now king of Scotland, into the hands of the king of Spain, to be governed and ruled only by him ; and to assm-e him, that if he would send any power, the young king should be delivered into his hands." She added, that " the king of Spain, in setting her up, would not only govern both these realms, but should also set up, in both, the catholic religion again." See Strype, Annals, ii. i. 74, 177 ; in >vhich latter passage ho mistakenly confounds the date of this letter of Parkhurst's with that of the banishment of the ambassador.] CLXV.] BISHOP PARKHURST TO H. EULLINGER. 399 cause is referred to nine earls, one viscount, and fifteen barons^. All these unanimously declared him guilty, and so he is at last con- demned to death. He is still hving however, between hope and fear, in the Tower of London*. The snow last year melted towards the beginning of February. This year it only began to fall at that time, and did not leave us till about the beginning of March. We are on good terms with the French, but the Spaniards are knitting their brows. I thank you very much for the very elegant little book on the Authority of Scripture and of the Church. Who- ever wrote it is certainly a learned and pious man. If your Zuinglius^ require my assistance, he shall not be disappointed of it : I wish both you and himself to be fully persuaded of this : for I shall certainly never falsify your good opinion of me. I cannot write more, for I am overwhelmed by numerous and important engagements. Farewell, my Bullinger. Salute all my friends. My wife salutes you all. In haste. Ludham, 10th March, 1572. Your John Parkhurst, [bishop] of Norwich. CLXVI. R. GUALTER, JUN. TO HIS FATHER. [B. 82.] London, June 5, 1572. Greeting. Should I omit any thing, honoured father, in this present letter, you must attribute it, not to myself, but to my sorrowful and distressed state of mind. For a most painful event [3 These were, George Talbot, earl of Shrewsbxiry, Reginald Grey, earl of Kent, Thomas RadclifFe, earl of Sussex, Henry Hastings, earl of Hunting- don, Francis Russell, earl of Bedford, Henry Herbert, earl of Pembroke, Edvvai'd Seymour, earl of Hertford, Ambrose Dudley, earl of Warwick, Robert Dudley, carl of Leicester, Walter Devereux, viscount Hereford, Edward lord Clinton, William lord Howard of Effingham, William Cecil, lord Burghley, Arthm' lord Grey of Wilton, James Blount, lord Mountjoy, William lord Sands, Thomas lord Wentworth, William lord Burroughs, Lewis lord Mordaunt, John Powlet, lord Saint-John of Basing, Robert lord Rich, Roger lord North, Edmund Bl-uges lord Chandos, Oliver lord Saint- John of Bletshoe, Thomas Sackvill lord Buckhurst, William West lord Delaware. See Camden's Elizabeth, p. 170. Strype, however, adds William earl of Worcester to the number of peers present, according, as he says, to a MS. in the Cottonian Library.] [4 See note 4, p. 383.] [5 BuUinger's grandson. Sec note 2, p. 393.] 400 R. GUALTER, JUN. TO HIS FATHER. [lET. has befallen us, which though it is very distressing to me to relate to you, it is nevertheless necessary for me to do so, as it especially concerns you to be informed of it. But I think that both yourself and master BulUnger, by reason of your great firmness of mind, "will bear with composure this occurrence, by which my most amiable cousin Rodolph Zuinglius has been summoned by Almighty God from this mortal state and the miseries of this world to a heavenly life. But as this requires a more lengthened detail than I can now enter upon in so short a time, as Hilles's son is setting oif in haste for Hamburgh, and the whole charge of arranging Zuinglius's funeral has devolved upon myself, I will only state a few particulars respecting him, reserving a further account for master BuUinger at the ensuing fair. When we were at Cambridge on the 12th of May, Henry Butler was desirous of going to London upon business; and our ZuingUus wished to accompany him, to see if he could procure some money there from the bishops, or from any other quarter, by means of Hilles, as he was in great want of money at that time. I had it in my mind to stay at Cambridge, partly because I had not any business of consequence, and partly because I could transact by letter all that I had to do. At last, however, they brought me over to their purpose, so that I readily undertook a journey which was neither inconvenient, nor yet very convenient to me. Our chief inducement was, that we might see the general assembly of the nobles and bishops of her most serene majesty in parhament. We set off therefore on the 12th of May, during an exceedingly high wind, so that we could not go on, but were obhged so to struggle against it, that in the whole of that day we scarcely completed twelve EngUsh miles, which are equivalent to two of ours. It was then a fast-day (according to the Enghsh custom), so that we could procure nothing in the inns except salt fish and other provisions of the hke kind. On the following day, which was the 13th, we completed thirty-two English miles, and arrived in London, which is only forty-four miles distant from Cambridge. The heat was intolerable. Rodolph never complained during the journey, until we were about eight miles from London ; and still he went on briskly, so that we reached our wished-for lodging about eight o'clock. On that and the three following days he ate scarcely any thing. When therefore we dined at the bishop of Ely's on the 17th, he was taken ill immediately after dinner, and continued so for nearly eight days, complaining of internal heat, which however could neither be discovered from his water nor from the pulse. CL.Wl.J R. Gt'ALTEK, JUN. TO HIS FATHER. 401 Doctors Turner' and Penny- attended him, the latter of whom is considered by the Enghsh as the most skilful physician in all Eng- land ; but they could not discover any symptoms by which to detect the nature of the disease. They had some suspicion that melancholic humours had flowed into the vessels of the diaphragm, and excited thirst and occasioned an increase of fever. At last tlicre came a disorder and pain of the left side, which they relieved by blisters, &c.; so that withui the ninth or tenth day he began to recover. But on the day immediately following he relapsed into his old complaint, namely, an inextinguishable heat, which could not be abated either by three successive bleedings or by any cooling draughts. Noises too, evidently not made by any living creature, were heard above his chamber ; they seemed rather to resemble the falUng down of trees, or of men of large stature ; and these things, when I reflected on others of the like nature, took away from me all expectation of his recovery. At last, when there was no hope of his getting better, the bishop of Ely and his wife^, Turner's mother, desired to remove him from the public hostel into his own house. But as he was unable either to walk or ride on horseback, and we could not contrive any means of getting him there by reason of his weakness, we kept him in the inn till the 4th of June, on which day, by the advice of Turner and Penny, and at the particular desire of the bishop of Ely, he was carried to his house in a litter. But I had long before this fancied that I saw the image of death in his countenance ; and therefore with earnest prayers to Almighty God for his blessing, when he arrived at the bishop's residence, we advised him to try to go to sleep, not dissembling in the mean time (as I should wish also to be done in my own case) his danger, and that the physicians had almost given him over, and exhorting him to place his confi- dence in God. As Butler had been sitting up with me on the preceding nights, he began to fall asleep in the first watch of the night, Avhich was assigned to myself: but when I perceived our patient breathing hard, I was afraid lest he should be choked for want of assistance, and called up the bishop's servant, who exhorting and praying with him bade him trust ui God. About the middle [1 Doctor Tui*ner was son of the celebrated physician of that name, of whom see above. Letter CVIII. p. 230.] [2 This seems to bo the Dr Penny " who was once a preacher, but then was tm'ncd a physician, and still enjoyed a good prebend in Paul's." Strypc, Parker, ii. 241.] [3 See above, Letter CLL p. 346.] 26 402 R. GUALTER, JUN. TO HIS FATHER. [lET. of the iiiglit, when I was alone with him, he began twice to draw so long a breath, and turn his eyes inwards, as that he seemed on the very point of departure : I therefore loudly shouted in his ears that he must commit his soul to God ; and this more than once, though my sobbings impeded my utterance. I sprinkled rose- water and vinegar on his face and lips, for the purpose of making him come to himself, which he did ; and taking up a book of prayers, I began with a loud voice to call upon God with him ; and the servant being again called in, together with Butler, wc were ex- pecting his last breath every moment. Meanwliile he called upon God so heartily, and with so much earnestness, as to excite our admiration. Five times did he appear to be giving up his spirit, and five times we revived him when just expiring. About three o'clock in the morning he began no longer to recognise us, and in some measure to be delirious : but at length, from four to five, he became more composed, and offered up most ardent prayers to God ; and about half-past five he neither heard nor saw us, nor was aware of our being present, and it was only by his breathing that we knew him to be alive. This, however, began to be more confined, and by six o'clock to cease altogether ; when at last stretching out his hands to heaven in token of his great stedfastness, while we were calling to him in the words of Christ, God, receive my spirit, and reciting in his ear the Lord's Prayer, he expired, and exchanged this mortal life for the immortal and unspeakable happiness of a heavenly one. Respecting other particulars I will write to Bullinger at the ensuing fair ; namely, how he inveighed against the ubiquitarians, &c. : for I have no time now, partly because I am wearied out from having been almost without sleep for four or five nights toge- ther, and partly too because the funeral preparations must be attended to within these two hours. He will be buried in the church of St Andrew's, in London, opposite the bishop of Ely's house, in the street called Holborn. Every thing is conducted in a handsome manner. I received during his illness from the bishop of Durham (who is prevented by sickness from attending parliament) twelve angels to be equally divided between us : the bishop of Winchester too had given us an angel apiece, and Parkhurst one, for all of which I will account next fair. Not much less than five angels are owing to the apothecaries, if indeed that will be sufficient for injections, decoctions, medicines, blisters, and numberless other expenses of the like kind. I will take charge of all his furniture as soon as I return to Cambridge, and will transmit you an inven- tory ; for I tliink it will be most convenient for it to be sent from CLXVI.] R, GUALTEB, JUN. TO HIS FATHER. 403 England together vs'ith my own luggage, if God, as I hope, shall allow me to return to you. But his will be done. If the money [of Zuinglius] should not be sufficient for his funeral, I wUl add some of my own, and will give you an account of every thing very shortly : I will too, at the same time, reply to your letter, which I have received here, together with four books, which I have for- warded and dehvered. Jewel is dead, as you are doubtless aware. Were I to write more, I should both neglect the funeral and also this letter : you will therefore be content Avith this, and give an account of every thing to master BuRinger. Farewell my father, and regard me, who am residing here almost against my will, with paternal love, that I may have some consolation. Again farewell. Dated at London, June 5th, on the day that Zuinglius died, 1572. We shall return to Cambridge in three days. Your most dutiful son, Rodolph Gualter. CLXVII. BISHOP COX TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 103.] London, Ely House, June 6, 1572. Much health in Christ, my brother. Tour letter, which was on many accounts most gratifying to me, and which you state to have been written on the 12th of March, came to hand about the end of May ; from which I understand that you have not yet received those books printed in this country, which you most learnedly and piously composed against the pope's bull. I sent, however, to the autumn fair at Frankfort both a letter and four books, together with a little money for the use of yourself and our friend Julius. The money I hear arrived safe ; but I am told that the letter and books are still loitering on the road. I therefore again send you a few copies for you to make use of, in case you should not receive the others. As to the news about which you write, may the great and good God turn all things to our good and the glory of his name ! It is a great satisfaction to us that your churches are at peace, and not without an accession of other churches to the sincere profession of the christian religion. When I have an opportunity of obtaining an audience from the queen's majesty, I will not forget to acquaint her with how great zeal and good will you espouse her cause. She was exceedingly dehghted with your book against that hullecV non- [1 Bullatas nugas, the pope's bull against queen Elizabeth. Sec note 4, p. 351.] 20— 2 404 BISHOP cox TO 11. DULLlNGliK. [lKT. sense, and read it with the greatest eagerness, as I informed you in my last letter, which you have not yet received. Respecting the Turkish war I shall only say thus much, that When the next house begins to burn, 'Tis like to prove your own concern i. Hitherto the pope has been antichrist. Should it please God to raise up another, even the Turk, it is only what our sins deserve. Our own affairs are in this condition. The duke of Norfolk", who most wickedly contrived a plot against our queen, has met with the punishment he deserved. Mary, the late queen of Scots, is publicly declared the enemy of our kingdom and queen, and is strictly kept in custody. She was meditating indeed both the destruction of our kingdom, the death of our queen, and the overthrow of our rehgion, by all possible means. Respecting your grandson ZuingUus I had rather say little, than much with grief. The affairs of mankind are not governed by our will, but by divine providence. His condition, however, is most blessed, although our earthly affections would foolishly have it otherwise. In fine, we must endure, and not find fault with that which cannot be avoided. May the Lord Jesus Christ, my esteemed brother, long, very long preserve you to us in safety ! London. From my house in Holborn, June 6, 1572. Your most attached Richard Cox, bishop of Ely. I intended to send you the books ; but this messenger of mine will only take charge of a letter, and not of a parcel. The books must be sent, if possible, by another conveyance to the next Frank- fort fair. CLXVIII. R. GUALTER TO BISHOP COX. [A. App. 7.'] Zurich, June 9, 1572. Health. 1 have received, reverend fiither in Christ, your letter, in which you reply to the one which, six years ago, namely, in the year 1566, I had written to my old friend, master Park- hurst. And as I chsplayed some degree of vehemence in writing, so do you also with no less warmth refute my assertions. But ^ " Tua res agitur, paries cum proximus ardet." [2 He was executed on Tower-hill, June 2nd. See note 4, p. 383, and Camden, Eliz. p. 177, who gives a full account of the proceedings.] [3 The original of this letter is printed in Strype, Parker, iii. 193. For bishop Cox's reply, see below. Letter CLXXIIL] CLXVIII.] R. GUALTER TO BISHOP COX. 405 you must know that I am so far from being offended by your free- dom, that I rather regard your admonition, or, if you choose, your reproof, in the hght of the greatest benefit. For I learn from it that I am loved by one, whom I was before wont to venerate, (though personally unknown to me,) for the erudition and piety of which Peter Martyr, of blessed memory, has often borne witness to me, and of which I now behold an evident proof in your letter. For I know it is the office of piety, to defend the commonweal against any adversaries ; but free admonition is an evidence of love, by which is laid open the error of a brother imposed upon by others, to the end that he may learn to entertain a more correct opinion. And since you have exhibited both these qualities with no less erudition than truth, I duly venerate your piety, and hope that the disagreement which had arisen between us, will prove the occasion of an indissoluble friendship. For I promise myself thus much from your courtesy, that you will readily pardon this my fault, when you consider at what time, from what motives, and to whom I wrote what I did. That time abounded in sore contentions, and letters on both sides were sent to us almost every day, while that unhappy controversy about the habits was agitated among you. We then advised your adversaries not to stir up a contention in the church for a matter of no importance, and we thought that the whole affair had been laid at rest. But lo ! contrary to all expectation, two Enghshmen "* arrive at Geneva, bringing with them a letter from master Beza, whose ears they had filled with calum- nies and false accusations, in which he entreated us to do our endeavour to help the most aflHicted state of England, and further exhorted me to make a journey to you for that purpose. To this was added the account of those two men, who told us the same story that they had done at Geneva, and that with so much assurance and affectation of piety, that they set down in writing a great many errors and superstitious abuses, which, as they asserted, were now maintained in England ; and that all such as would not consent thereunto were cast out of their ministry. They added, that their most grievous cause of complaint was this, namely, that most of the bishops had become the willing executors of those things which were daily coined at court by superstitious and ambi- tious courtiers. [^ One of these Strypo suspects to be George Withers, whom he else- where states to be a man of good learning, preacher at Bury St Edmund's. Life of Parker, i. 374. The other was probably Perceval Wibum. See above, Letters CXII. and CXXV.] 406 R. GU ALTER TO BISHOP COX. [lET/ Who would suspect that any persons could be so barefaced, as to dare to lie with such assurance on matters of such notoriety, and the truth of which could not long be concealed? The account given by these men certainly troubled us not a little ; and I ac- knowledge, that on the impulse of the moment I composed and sent that letter to master Parkhurst, with whom I thought myself at liberty to act more freely on account of our ancient friendship, which commenced five and thirty years ago at Oxford, and was afterwards so confirmed by his being entertained for four years at my house, that I desire him to possess all influence with me, and I can promise myself in return the same from him. Nothing was further from my thoughts than that he would publish my letter abroad. For I rather desired to hear his opinion, though indeed he had never written any thing upon the subject. The thing which moved me not a little was, that shortly after master Abel, a most worthy man, and a friend of us both, wrote to me concerning this matter, and acquitted all of you from any blame. I was not therefore at all anxious about that letter of mine, which I had Avritten solely to my friend Parkhurst, of whose regard for me I neither can nor ought to doubt. But as I am at length given to understand that it has been published far and wide, this certainly distresses me exceedingly. And I own, my reverend father, that I am deeply indebted to your excellence for having made me ac- quainted with this circumstance, though after so long an interval. And as you tell me that you entertain no doubt of the candour and sincerity of my mind, I reverently ask your kindness to make my excuse also to others, into whose hands that letter happened to come. Since that time Ave have certainly had nothing to do with those vain brawlers, who neither at any time wrote to us, nor had it in their power to boast of any letters from us. For not long after it appeared more evidently what were their designs, when, under the pretence of ecclesiastical discipline, (the principal part whereof they make to consist in excommunication,) they were the chief authors of those changes in the Palatinate, which have inflicted such a blow upon the churches in that quarter. ^ I once more, therefore, entreat your excellence, reverend father in Christ, not to have any sinister suspicion of Gualtcr, Avho bears a singular affection to the English name. For I will take care, if the Lord Avill, that a public testimony^ shall appear of my opinion of [1 The public testimony which Gualtcr here promised to set forth, was his Epistle before his Homilies on the first epistle to the Corinthians, in which CLXVIII.] R. GUALTEll TO BISHOP COX. 407 all of you who are the servants of Christ in that kingdom. And indeed, unless I had truly persuaded myself of our agreement, I should certainly never have sent my son^, the only son of my departed Zuingha, the remembrance of whom is so precious to me, into England. Whom if you are surprised that I have not liitherto commended to your excellence, you must suppose that I have omit- ted to do so for no other reason, than that there has heretofore been no intercourse between us by letter ; and I should be ashamed to trouble a person of your station, and known to me only by name, with a letter of business on my private aifairs. The reports that are rife among us you will learn from master Sandys, the bishop of London : I am unable to repeat them in this letter on account of the haste of the bearer, whom I have met with contrary to my expectation. May Christ Jesus preserve your excellence, and guide you by his Spirit ! Amen. Zurich, June 9, 1572. Your excellence's most devoted, Rodolph Gualter. CLXIX. R. HILLES TO H. BULLINGER. QA. 104.] London, July 10, 1572. Much health. In March last I sent my letter, dated on the 18th of the preceding February, to my son Barnabas, that it might be delivered to the care of Christopher Froschover at the Frankfort spring fair ; and I hope you have received it from him. At the same time J received two very long and friendly letters from you, the first written on the 20th of December, and the other on the 12th of last March, together with a slip of paper inclosed in them, in which you write me word what you have heard from Venice respecting the defeat^ of the Turks, and what you can learn respect- ing the state of Germany and the cessation of the persecution, &c. For these letters and this intelligence I sincerely thank you. At the time of the same fair I received from you some other letters to certain of our bishops, which I gave in charge with all diligence to Rodolph Gualter and Henry Butler, who had other matters of their own to transact with the bishops, (who are now his argument ran chiefly of the unity of the church ; wherein he shewed that none ought rashly to depart from its society for the vices of any that lived in it. Strj'pe, Life of Parkei*, ii. 112, 113. See below, p. 416. n. 2.] [2 See above, p. 385.] [3 Namely, at the battle of Lepanto, gained by Don John of Austria in 1571.] 408 B. HILLES TO H. niTLLINGER. [l-KT. engaged at the public assembly, which we call the 'Parliament,) that they might deliver them to each, as they write me word they have done, except the one which you wrote to Jewel, bishop of Salisbury, which, as he is dead, I handed over, according to your desire, to Parkhurst, bishop of Norwich. But what do you think ? How it has happened, I know not; but neither then, nor at any time since, have I received the books you mention, written concern- ing Exhortation, neither in Latin, nor in German ; so that I know not what answer to make respecting them. I have however to thank you in the mean time for those two copies in German, and one in Latin, which you ordered to be sent to me here. Moreover, the above-named Rodolph and Henry have no certain intelligence respecting those books. I have received, however, the books pub- lished in Latin by Rodolph's father, together with those which the said persons have distributed to those to whom Rodolph's father wished them to be sent : thank him, I pray you, in my name, for the book which he sent me, and the very friendly letter which he wrote to me on the 10 th of IVIarch last. As for the thirty-two pieces of gold about which you write, my son Gerson paid sixteen of them at the last winter fair at Frank- fort to Christopher Froschover, for those ten crowns of the right reverend the bishop of Winchester which you mention. The other sixteen were for those other ten crowns which the bishop of Ely paid here to the aforesaid Gerson, to repay to you. My son added, moreover, that he paid over to the said Froschover at the same time ten pieces of gold for Julius Sancterentianus, which the right reverend the bishop of Ely had before placed here to be paid to the said Julius. As to your writing me word to this effect, that " it was without doubt through a mistake at the spring fair, that the twenty-seven dollars," &c.^ I know not how to set you at ease, because you do not mention whether my son Barnabas, who was present at that Frankfort fair, paid over those twenty- seven dollars to Froschover. Your grandson^ Zuinglius departed from this most corrupt generation to God, here at London, in June last, and is added to the assembly of the saints, among whom he sings praises to God his Redeemer. But Podolph Gualtcr\ together with Henry Butler, [1 This parliament began May the 8th. Strype, Annals, ir. i. 183.] [2 The MS. is here unintelligible.] [3 See Lett. CLXVI.] [■* Bishop Parkhurst maintained him, first at Cambridge, and then at Oxford, (in fellows' commons at Magdalen college,) and gave him a viaticum to bear his charges when he retunuid home. Strype, Annals, ii. i. 508.] CLXIX.] R. HILLES TO H. rULLIXGER. 409 are now returned to Cambridge, whence they came hither at the opening of parhament with the bishop of Norwich, whom I hear to be the especial patron of Henry Butler ; to whose mother or friends I will thank you to write, to say that he has received no remit- tances from them since he came to England. Wherefore, when he was ill at Cambridge, and also a short time before, I lent him two pounds ten shillings of English money, worth in German money thirteen florins and five batzen^ ; which I will beg of you to receive from her, and retain for yourself out of them twelve florins and twelve batzen for the eight French crowns which the reverend the bishop of Norwich sent me, with the paper which I have inclosed in this letter. The remaining eight batzen I would have you pre- sent to some poor student. It is but just (as I told you before) that those who send their sons to England, should rather deposit their money at Frankfort beforehand, than require others to ad- vance it for them here in England, and then to have to demand payment at Frankfort. Henry Butler's mother, as he informed me, is living at Lindau. On the second of this'' month the duke of Norfolk was be- headed, having been long since condemned for high treason. I am glad to hear from you that you are by the blessing of God in tole- rable health and peace ; but grieve much to hear that you are dis- tressed by the dearth of provisions and all other things. I hope however, that after the supplication appointed by public authority, God will in mercy look upon you, and again remove that fatherly correction with which he is wont for the most part to punish those whom he loves. I am also very sorry that you had been so ill with a severe cough for three weeks before you wrote. But you well know that God often visits those whom he loves. I pray that he may grant you patience, and, as you express yourself, deal with you in mercy according to his good pleasure. My wife salutes you very much, and entreats you to commend her to God in your prayers, as she is greatly afflicted with a contraction of the muscles and nerves, which we call spasms, and also Avith the gravel. A treaty '^ has been entered upon this year between our most [5 A batzen is hero considered equivalent to three pence of our money ; a florin to three shillings and ninepence ; and a French crown to six shillings.] [^ The duke was beheaded on Monday the second of June, having been condemned five months before. Strype, Annals, ii. i. 191, and Camden's Elizabeth, p. 177.] [■? In this league the French obliged themselves not to assist the Scottish queen ; being content to make no mention of her, or of being her friend 410 R. HILLES TO H. BULLINGER. [lET. serene queen of England, France, and Ireland, and the king of France, a solemn engagement having been entered into by both parties on Sunday the 15th of June' last in the cathedral church of St Peter in Westminster. On the 25th of June I first received your letter, dated Zurich, October 1st, 1571, and sent by Frederick Conders, a gentleman whom you commended to me. And if I can serve him in any thing, without inconvenience or trouble to myself, I will, as you request, most willingly do so. I add this moreover, to let you know the news that I have received from the Netherlands, which are now under the authority of king Philip ; namely, that towards the end of last March, a Dutch ^ gentleman, named Mens. Lumell [Lumey] attacked a certain seaport in Holland, called the Brill, and took it by force from the dominion of king Philip. I have heard too, that afterwards a thousand Spaniards and Walloons, subjects, I mean, of king Philip who speak the French language, entered the town of Middleberg, and in their progress laid waste a certain village of Zeeland called Armuyden. There is also a large body of troops collected in Flushing from France and England and other neigh- bouring countries ; but I hear that nothing of any consequence has been done by the Spaniards against those who are at the Brill, or in Flushing above mentioned, except what I shall afterwards state. But a very short address was lately brought hither from Flanders, printed both in French and Dutch, in which the prince of Orange adopts the same titles of honour and authority as he did in the Netherlands before his exile ^ ; and he exhorts the Dutch, who have already been resisting the Spaniards, either now or never to and ally ; but gave her over to the queen's majesty, whatsoever demands they had made for her before. The league was afterwards confirmed and signed by very honourable ambassadors sent over on both sides : viz. Mont- morency from France, and the lord admiral from England. Strype, Annals, ir. i. 211, 214. For all the articles of this treaty see Camden, Eliz. p. 185.] [1 The treaty was confirmed on May 15th at Westminster. Camden, as above.] [2 William Vandcrmarko, lord of Lumey. See Camden, Eliz. p. 184.] [3 William, prince of Orange, had opposed, by all regular and dutiful means, the progress of the Spanish usurpations ; and when Alva conducted his army into the Netherlands, and assumed the government, this princej well acquainted with the violent character of the man, and the tyrannical spirit of the court of Madrid, wisely fled from the danger which threatened him, and retired to his paternal estate and dominions in Gemiany. He was cited to appear before Alva's tribunal, was condemned in absence, was declared a rebel, and his ample possessions in the low countries wore confis- cated, Ilumc.] CLXIX.j n. IlILLES TO H. BULLINGER. Ml shew themselves men against the tyranny and unjust exactions of that people, and against the bishops of those parts, and the clergy their companions ; and he assures them, that if they will but shew themselves men, they can easily shake off the heavy yoke of bond- age, which the duke of Alva with the Spaniards and bishops afore- said has most iniquitously imposed upon them, not only against the common weal or public good of that country, but also against the honour and good faith of king Phihp. Moreover, in the month of March last, part of the city of Valenciennes, in the province of Hainault, in French Flanders, revolted from the government of the aforesaid duke of Alva, and drove out the Spaniards and leading authorities of the place ; and allowed the count Lewis, brother of the prince of Orange, with eight hundred or a thousand armed soldiers (of whom the greater part are French,) to enter and garri- son the city for the service of king Philip, as they pretended, though they reject the authority of the duke of Alva and his party. But from that time, because the said troops neglected to occupy the fortress of Valenciennes, they were forced again to retreat, and leave the city to the duke and his soldiers, who very lately arrived there in great numbers. We have next heard for a fact that a city called Venlo, the least city in Guelderland, has also sent back his messenger to the duke of Alva ; and that, like Brill and Flushing, many other cities in the Netherlands have revolted and fallen away from the duke of Alva, on account of the tyranny which he has of late years exercised among them. Besides this, it is related to me as a certain fact, that two small vessels cominj; from Flushing have arrived in the Thames, in which letters are brought conveying the intclUgence to some Dutch residents in this country, that a great sea-fight took place last week on the sea-coast of Flanders, not far from Sluys. The citizens of Flushing, whose strength and power seem now to be composed of foreigners, took at the same time, midway between Flanders and Flushing, fifteen or sixteen vessels laden with spices and rich merchandise, besides some specie ; which ships had come from Spain and Portugal, and were on their way to Antwerp, together with thirty or forty ships of war and transports wliich conveyed the duke of Medina Celi with twelve hundred Spanish soldiers who accompanied hira, and landed in the Netherlands. For king Philip has appointed this duke of Medina Celi his vice-roy in Flanders, because the said king, as it is reported, has determined that the duke of Alva shall go back to Spain. Then again, it is stated, and this too as a certain fact, that the 412 B. IIILLES TO H. BULLINGER. [lET. same citizens of Flushing drove upon the shallows two or three other of the ships which they took, and there wrecked them ; besides which they set on fire and destroyed two or three more. But, as many persons here assert, these two or three ships last mentioned as being burnt, were laden with Spanish wool on their way to Bruges, and were included in the thirty or forty ships which came from Spain under the care and convoy of the said duke of Medina CeU ; and not of the number of the fifteen or sixteen vessels which were going to Antwerp, and which were taken in sight of Flushing and Middleberg : but it seems to me very lament- able that the merchants of Antwerp, (who without doubt are not more favourably inclined to that impious and cruel duke of Alva than those who are now at the Brill and Flushing,) and the mer- chants of Spain and Portugal, should be plundered in this way of their goods and merchandise, and perhaps the greater part of their crews slain, drowned, or hung ; so that there is reason to fear, that in the countries subject to king Philip there will be for some years to come as little business and traffic, as it is called, and as great and extensive civil wars as have within these few years taken place in France, unless it should please Almighty God to turn aside his indignation from the Netherlands, as we must pray him to do according to his mercy. Farewell ; and may Almighty God very long preserve you to the advancement of his glory and the edification of his church ! London, July 10, 1572. Your Richard Hilles. CLXX. LORD BURGHLEY TO J. STURM lUS. [B. 85.] Woodstock ', Sept. 15, 1572. Your letters have been dehvered to me, most accomplished Sturmius, both that which you wrote privately to myself, and that written to the queen's majesty ; in which you inform us of the death of master Mont, a man who by reason of his extreme dili- gence and fidehty in watching over the interests of this kingdom, as attested by the experience of many years, was most highly esteemed by her majesty and by every one of us. We are not \} Lord Burghley was then attending queen Elizabeth on a progress, in which she visited Havering Bower, Theobalds, Gorhambury, Dunstable, Woburn, Warwick, Kenilworth, Compton, Berkeley Castle, and Woodstock, at which latter place she is said to have received the intelligence of the massacre of Pai-is.] CLXX.] LORD EUKGHLEY TO J. STUIIMIUS. 413 however more affected by liis loss, than we are comforted by the expression of your good-will and duty, which is, as it were, a just counterbalance. And this indeed falls out very opportunely, by reason of our opinion of your rehgion, wisdom, and integrity ; especially in these times, when there is need of great prudence and fidehty in exposing the designs and doings of men, on account of the recent calamities in France^, and the disturbed state of almost all Europe. Her majesty therefore accepts, as is fitting, the hom- age of your duty so diUgently and readily offered, and will wiUingly appoint you in the place of Mont, and with the same salary ; which, though it be little in proportion to your accomplishments and abilities, we think you will be disposed to estimate rather by the dignity and good-will of her majesty herself, than by its intrinsic value ; and that, whatever deficiency there may be in this respect, you will entirely rely upon her favour and beneficence. I would have sent you this stipend, according to the queen's wish, with a letter from her majesty, if I either thought this messenger sufli- cicntly suitable, or felt disposed to entrust him on this journey (which on account of these new perils both of places and times and circumstances seems likely to be a very difficult one) with any thing besides this letter expressive of her majesty's favourable incUnation, and also of my personal good-will towards you. Where- fore you will not in the mean time expect any thing more from us, who are exceedingly busied in keeping from our borders the flame of the fires that are burning so near us. When their fury shall have been extinguished or allayed by the divine goodness, you will then find a more convenient way both of transmitting your letters to us, and of receiving this stipend for yourself. Farewell. Dated at Woodstock, Sept. 15, 1572. Your exceeding well-wisher, William Cecil, baron of Burghley. CLXXI. BISHOP HORN TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 105.] Farnham Castle, Jan. 10, 1573. Grace and peace in Christ ! Though you truly describe me, my BulUnger, beloved in Christ, as one who is for the most part distracted by numerous and important engagements, as well by those of a private nature as by the public affairs both of church [2 Namely, the massacre of St Bartholomew's three weeks before. See the next letter, note 1, and the authorities there quoted.] 414 niSHOP HORN TO II, BULLINGER. [lET. and state ; yet, however I may be occupied, I have always leisure both for reading and answering your letters. For as your conver- sation, when present, was always delightful to me, so now your letters in yom* absence are most pleasant and agreeable ; by which alone, when I am here, I seem to myself to be listening, to my great and incredible comfort, to one whom, Avhen I was tliere. I never beheld without great and pecuhar pleasure. But to come to that part of your letter which is of the greatest importance, and wherein you make so earnest and positive a request, that you may learn from me what is the present posture of affairs both in church and state, in this and the neighbouring countries. Respecting France first of all, you have doubtless heard long since, and not without the greatest concern, the wretched and calamitous condition of the churches in those quarters ; how that unhappy country, still dripping (as it were) with a horrible and bloody slaughter ^ is foully dyed in the blood ^f the saints. In which we have this sohtary but yet certain comfort, that, as the blood of Christians is the seed of the gospel, so, in proportion as they shall have sown the seed more abundantly, we may expect a more abundant harvest. Respecting the Belgic affairs I have hardly any thing to com- municate. The Prince [of Orange], resting the whole of this winter season in Holland, has done nothing worthy of notice that I know of. It does not yet appear what he will do when the spring comes on. But as the alhance with France is now at an end, I am afraid lest all things should become worse. Scotland, under her present circumstances, is quiet, and desires peace. For the majority have gone over to the king's party, who reigns by almost universal consent. But what will be the issue of this peace, in this uncertain state of affairs in general, we are un- able to determine ; we hope indeed, as we also wish, for the best. Our England, having secured tranquilUty at home and peace abroad, is sailing as it were with full sails and a prosperous breeze. The church, however, is vehemently agitated, and not without danger ; not so much from the opposition of the papists, who are daily restrained by severe laws, as by the stumbling-blocks occa- sioned by false brethi'en, who seem to be sliding into anabaptism. May the Lord Jesus at length, by his coming down from heaven, \} Namely, the massacre of St Bartholomew's, Aug. 24, 1572 ; for the par- ticulars of which the reader is refen-ed to Davila's History of the Civil Wars, Sully's Memoirs, Mezera/s History of France, Wraxall's History of the House of Vulois, Thuanus, &c.] CLXXI.1 BISHOP HORN TO H. BULLINGER. 415 extino-uish all the flames of this tumultuous world, and so take away the sorrows of the miUtant church, that all tears may be wiped away from our eyes, and we may all triumph together with him for ever in the heavenly and new Jerusalem ! Farewell in Christ Jesus. From my castle at Farnham, Jan. 10, 1572. [1573.] Yours wholly in Christ, Robert Winton. CLXXII. BISHOP PARKHURST TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 106.] LuDHAM, Jan. 20, 1573. I RECEIVED on the 23rd of May your most beautiful and pious address, together with your letters to myself and Jewel. Jewel's letter I retained iij my possession, as he had departed this hfe be- fore its arrival. The queen of Scotland still remains among us. She was in great alarm for herself last parliament"*^, and not without reason ; for had not the extreme clemency of our queen prevented it, it would have been all over with her. What will be done respecting her in the next parliament, I cannot tell. She has certainly very few friends in this country. And what wonder, when she has been hankering after this kingdom, and is defiled and almost overwhelmed with so many and great crimes? Since those three quarrelsome preachers^ have been sent away from hence, the greatest quiet and unanimity is prevailing in the Dutch church. Your reply to the Bavarian articles is translated [2 A few days after the parliament met, the lord keeper sent for the lower house, and declared to them, that it was the queen's pleasure, that a certain number of the upper house, and of the lower, should the next morning meet together in the stai'-chamber, to consult and debate upon the queen of Scots' matters. A committee accordingly was appointed of com- moners, to meet with the lords, to consider how to proceed in that great cause. And after the conference, Mr Attorney of the com-t of wards made report of that conference. And at lengtli it was resolved, for the better safety and preservation of the queen, and the present state, to proceed against the Scottish queen in the highest degree of treason. And therein to touch her, as well in life, as in title and dignity ; and that of necessity, with all possible speed, by the voice of the house. The queen however, for certain respects by herself conceived, thought good for this time to defer, but not to reject, that coui-se of proceeding. Strypo, Annals, ii. i. 19G, 197.] [3 Sec above, p. 362. n. 4.] 41 6. liJSnOi* PAIIKHUUST TO H. BOLLINGER. [lET. into English, and is in every one's hands. I received another letter from you on December 10th, in which you write that a great disturbance had arisen in the Grisons. The pope, who is the author of this, and every thing else that is bad, is going on in his old way. But it is well that it is put an end to by the death of that most popish vagabond, who endeavoured to restore popery. On the first of April will commence our famous sittings of parliament. The frost and snow have continued these eight weeks, and almost without intermission during the whole time. But praised be God ! they have at length left us. Farewell, my excellent Bulhnger. Salute in my name all your family, male and female, and all my Zurich friends. My wife, who is now ill of the gout, salutes you all. In haste. Ludham, 20 Jan. 1573. Yours most sincerely, John Parkhurst, [bishop] of Norwich. CLXXIII. BISHOP COX TO R. GUALTER. [A. 107.] Ely, Feb. 4, 1573. Your two letters, Rodolph, dearly beloved in Christ, were brought to me last summer, and received not without great satis- faction. The ' first exhibited the exceeding ingenuousness of a pious breast : for you will rarely meet with persons endowed with such sincerity of mind, as to take in good part the advice of a friend ; but the grace of the Holy Spirit has enhghtened and embued you with that charity, that you hope all things, and beheve all things, and interpret all things for the best. But your last letter most clearly manifested a true brotherly affection to our church, as well as towards myself and some of my episcopal brethren ; since, namely, you vouchsafed to do us the honour of dedicating to us your exposition of the epistles of St Paul to the Corjnthians^. This exposition indeed is so learned, pious, and perspicuous, that it [1 See above, Letter CLXVIII.] [2 About the autumn of 1572 did Gualter publish ninety-five homilies upon the former epistle to the Corinthians, which he dedicated to bishops Grindal, Sandys, Horn, Cox, Parkhurst, and Pilkington. In his prefatoiy epistle to them, his argument ran chiefly of the unity of the church ; wherein he shewed that none ought rashly to depart from its society for the vices of any that lived in it. See Strypc, Life of Parker, n. Ho. Annals, ii. i. 462.] CLXXllI. BlSHOl* COX TO U. GUALTER. 417 needs no commendation of mine, which is but of little value. By your having subjoined an admonition to brotherly unity, you mani- festly evince that you entertain the greatest aiFection towards our church, and desire that we should serve the Lord our God without hinderance and distraction of mind. For it is in this way that the glory of God and the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ may be pro- moted with the greatest success, although there must needs be heresies in the mean time for the trying of the elect. You make use of many arguments in your preface, and those most powerful ones ; but I dare not decide what Aveight they will have mth our innovators. Meanwhile, however, I will not doubt but that the word of the Lord will bring forth its fruit in due season. I return you my best thanks for the book you sent me. If I am unable fully to return your kindness, I will not in the mean time cease from taking care of and providing for your son of excel- lent promise, so long as he shall sojourn among us. And as far as he is concerned, I must desire you to shut both your ears ; for you would deservedly think rae most ungrateful, if I did not shew you some little kindness. AVhen I had entirely gone over your preface, I was exceedingly sorry that it had been published before you had been fully acquainted with the absurdities of our people. For they have lately broken down, by their abusive writings, the barriers of all the order of our church. But that you may partly understand their design, I send you some heads of articles, which they have printed, and taken upon themselves to maintain. I could wish that you, together with my very dear brother in Christ, master Bul- linger, would consider and decide upon them ; and if it is not too much trouble, that you would send me your opinion respecting them. Articles drawn up by certain Englishmen, now disturbers of the state of the Anglican church : I. The names and functions of archbishops, bishops, and other officials, ought to be abolished altogether. II. The election of the ministers of the word and sacraments should be restored to the people, as not belonging to the episcopal office. III. No one ought to be confined to set forms of prayer. IV. No sacrament ought to be administered without being preceded by a sermon, preached, and not read. V. The father alone ought to answer for his child in baptism, without any other sponsors. 27 418 BISHOP cox TO R. GUALTER. [lET. VI. All the ministers of the church ought to be equal, not one superior to another. VII. They condemn the order of confirmation, in which the bishops lay their hands upon the children on their repeating the catechism, and pray the Lord that he may vouchsafe to increase in them the knowledge of his word and godliness. VIII. They cannot endure the sermons which are preached at the burial of the dead. IX. They cannot endure the reading of the holy scriptures in the church. There are, moreover, other things really too absurd, with which I am unwilling to take up your time, and weary you with my too troublesome importunity. Satan is envious of our prosperity. It is not enough to have the papists our enemies, without stirring up men of their opinion who are labouring to bring about a revolution in the church. One thing I had almost forgotten to mention. There came out last summer an immense volume by one Nicolas Saunders, who is, they say, a countryman of ours ; the title of which is " The Monarchy of the Church \" He appears to have been a mercenary employed by certain cardinals, aided by the assistance of others, and decked out like ^Esop's jackdaw. The tempest is violent, and would seem to demohsh all our pretensions at one blast. It takes away from christian magistrates the right of deciding in matters of religion, and claims it entirely for the pope and his officers, as the supreme governor of the church. Our friend Jewel is dead, and has left among us but few equal to him. It is therefore your concern and mine, to cut off the heads of this hydra. I have your book respecting the pope being antichrist, which this man takes much pains to refute. You will not, I hope, allow him to triumph. May the great and good God preserve you many years for the safety of his church ! From the Isle of Ely in England. Feb. 4, 1572, according to the English computation. I send you a remembrance, though a very small one, of five Enghsh crowns. Your most attached brother in Christ, Richard Ely, bishop in England. [^ The title in Latin is, De visibili monarcliia. It was answered by Dr Bartholomew Clerk, of King's College, Cambridge, (in a book entitled Fidelis servi subdito infideli responsio, cum examine errorum N. Sanders in lihro d« visibili monarcliia,) and also by Dr Ackworth. Strype, Life of Parker, ii. 181.] CLXXIV.] BISHOP COX TO H. BULLINGER. 419 CLXXIV. BISHOP COX TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 108.] [Without date.] 2 Your letter, reverend brother in Christ, cannot be otherwise than agreeable to me, breathing as it does so much piety and kindness. I heartily congratulate you on the possession of those bodily powers which you mention, and which by the grace of God will enable you to perform your office. May our gracious Lord preserve them to you for many years, to the glory of his name and the edifying of the church ! I glory in the Lord together with you, that having reached through his boimty my seventy-fourth year, I am not so deprived of strength as to be unable to do credit, in some measure at least, to the situation in which I am placed ; excepting only that a trembling of my hands in some degree hinders the use of my pen. I only entreat my Lord that I may never become indolent in my office, but that I may grow more and more active even unto the last act of the drama. I am sorry that you are without a copy of your books. I gave directions to om' printer to forward you some, which I hear from him that he will faithfully undertake to do, unless all the copies should be dispersed. As to what you write respecting the Turks, and those who side with them, I must confess that we live in an evil age, and are fallen upon most perilous times. And when this circumstance comes into the minds of pious persons, they admire even to amaze- ment the inscrutable judgments of God, as to what will become of the godly, when so many christian kingdoms are invaded and laid Avaste by the Turk ; when he is even now hanging over our heads; when the rehgion of Cliristians is thrust into a corner, and dis- tracted and torn in pieces by innumerable disputes and contentions ; and lastly, when it is every where harassed and oppressed by the most cruel persecutions of the papists. For three transgressions mid for four the Lord ivill not turn. [Amos i. 3.] I greatly fear also, what will be the consequence of these most obstinate contentions of ours, and of those principles of ungodly men so entirely opposed to christian love. I wish, indeed, they Avould follow the advice of that book which you lately published concerning the agreement of ministers ; but this is rather to be desired than hoped for. You may obtain some information about these disputes from oui* excellent friend, master Gualtcr. Our people are still [2 This letter seems to have been sent at the same time with the pre- ceding cue, and is therefore arranged accordingly.] 27 Q 420 BISHOP cox TO H. BULLINGEK. [lET. persisting in making innovations. They find fault Avith that prayer wherein we pray God that we may be delivered from all adver- sities'. We use in our prayers the song of the blessed Virgin, of John the Baptist^, and of the aged Simeon. This they cannot endure. We use also to repeat at the end of each psalm, when they are said before the people, " Glory be to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Ghost." This they call vain repetition. But I will desist from troubling you any farther with these vani- ties ; we ask of God a remedy for them. Meanwhile, however, we do not cease to oppose evils of this kind, as far as the Lord may vouchsafe to afford us strength. I have not yet received your book on the persecutions of the church. I desire, my esteemed brother in Christ, that you may live in safety many years, and that you may use your exertions for the restoration of the church of God, even to the end. I have sent six crowns of this country to my friend Julius. Your most attached brother in Christ, The bishop and servant of the church of Ely, Richard Cox, bishop of Ely. CLXXV. BISHOP COX TO R. GUALTER. [A. 109.] Ely, June 12, 1573. I RECEIVED your letter, Gualter, dearly beloved brother in Christ, in this present month of June, 1573. I am surprised that the letters have not yet reached you, which I wrote at the beginning of last spring both to yourself and to my reverend father and brother, master Bullinger. It would have been far more gratify- ing and agreeable to me for you to have learned from the letter I then wrote, with how much delight your discourses were received, together with your letter noticing with so much prudence, learning, and piety, some points now controverted among us. You would have learned moreover from that letter of mine, what confusion has been occasioned in our not ill-constituted church, by some factious [1 " Exceptions Avcro taken to prayer against tempest, when none seems at hand ; to the Magnificat, and other scriptural hymns, introduced for no conceivable purpose but to honour the Virgin, the Baptist, or similar per- sonages, therefore profanations of scripture." Soames's Elizabethan Hist, p. 167.] [^ i. e. the Benedictus, uttered at the birth of John the Baptist. Luke i. 6H, &c.] CLXXV.] BISHOP COX TO R. GUALTER. 421 and heady men, who in their writings^ and sermons, and private conversation, condemn and pull in pieces the whole economy of our church, and bring all the bishops and other ministers of the word into incredible disfavour with the people, and also with the magis- trates and nobiUty. Nay, they even reject this order as being of no use to the church of Christ, and are striving by every means in their power that it may be altogether abolished. But the Lord God has imbued our most religious queen and some of her principal ministers with that discretion and piety, that these men, as I hope, will strive to no purpose. Their object is .to revive the ancient presbytery of the primitive church, and to establish such an equality among all ministers, that they may be despised and rejected even by the church itself; so that it is to be feared lest Christ himself should be banished by little and little. As to your son having sent a letter in the way you mention, he has ingenuously performed the part of a well principled young man. If he would come and see me more frequently, or address me by letter, he should not have to repent the performance of so trifling a courtesy. You must not be grieved, my Gualter, that the sectaries are shewing; themselves to be mischievous and wicked interpreters of your most just opinion. For it cannot be otherwise, but that tares must grow in the Lord''s field, and that in no small quantity. Of this kind are the Anabaptists, Donatists, Arians, papists, and all the good-for-nothing tribe of the sectaries. But our solid comfort is from Christ : " Blessed are ye when men shall speak evil of you falsely, for my sake." Your remarks about observing moderation in external matters, provided that the truth of Christ and faith is maintained inviolate, proceed from sincere piety and most solid judgment. With respect to their estimation of your character, they are indeed contemptible, who desist not from attacking the character of all good men : they are unable hoAvever to injure either your reputation or mine by their revilings. For it is not to them, but to the Lord, that we stand and fall. I hope you have received before this time my former letters sent to master Bullinger and yourself. I took care that they [3 The bishop seems to refer to the celebrated admonition to the parlia- ment, for an account of which see Strype, Life of Whitgift, i. 54, &c. and Soames's Elizabethan History, p. 163, &c. The latter writer states, that " its authors, ostensibly, and perhaps principally, were John Field and Thomas Wilcox, two puritanical clergymen of great note among the Londoners of their party." To these " Gilbyc, Sampson, Lever, are added by Abp. Ban- croft, in his Survey of the pretended Holy discipline/'] 422 BISHOP cox TO K. GUALTEK [lET. should be delivered, together with twenty-five gulden', as they call them, by Richard Hilles, a merchant of this country, to your friend Froschover, to be forwarded to you. May the Lord Jesus very lono- preserve you in safety to us, for the very great advantage of his church ! Salute in my name that pillar of the church of Christ, master Henry BuUinger. From my episcopal house in the isle of Ely, in England, June 12, 1573. Your most loving friend in Christ, Richard Cox, bishop of Ely. CLXXVI. R. GUALTER TO THE EARL OF BEDFORD. [B. 88.] Zurich, July 17, 1573. Health. Had I not already experienced, most illustrious prince, your kindness and pious zeal in favour of good men, I should be afraid that my letters, wherein I now commend one, and now ano- ther individual, would be troublesome to your clemency. And yet such, occasionally, are the circumstances of my most intimate friends, that I cannot refuse them this service, which is an act of kindness in itself, and may be productive of some benefit to them. And I would have this especially understood in reference to the bearer of this letter. He is the son of a noble and excellent man, the baron of Alt-Sax", a youth^ of good disposition and the greatest hope, who after having resided some time at Heidelberg, proceeded from thence to the most illustrious duke of Magdeburg. But he is now, by liis father's desire, coming to England, to obtain an appointment at the court of her most serene majesty, suitable to his birth. I hear that he is recommended to the queen by the most illustrious prince, the elector palatine, whose recommendation will, I doubt not, have so much weight, as that this of mine wiU seem altogether superfluous. But as the father of the young man wished him also to be introduced to my friends, I could not refuse his request. For he is a most godly man, a distinguished wor- shipper of God, and no less persevering than diligent in advancing the kingdom of Christ. For, a few years since, he 'banished all [1 A gulden is about half-a-crown of English money.] [2 Alt-Sax, and Forsteck mentioned below, are in the valley of the Rhine, near Appenzell.] [3 There are many letters from this youth at Zurich and ZoflBngen, some of which are from England, but none concei'ning English affairs. All shew- that ho was, as Gualter states him to have been, a young man of excellent disposition. He was a friend and fellow-student of Gualter's son at Oxford.] CLXXVI.] R. GUALTER TO THE EARL OP BEDFORD. 423 unlawful worsliip from his territory, which is surrounded by papists on all sides ; restored the purer teaching of the word, and esta- blished the right administration of the sacraments, together with a moral discipline worthy of christi|in men. He has by this proce- dure excited against him the hatred of many, and has for some time had powerful enemies, who have left no means untried for liis destruction. But Almighty God has preserved him, so that now Christ is preached in his territory, the whole of which had been before occupied by popish superstition. He has many sons, whom he wishes to be brought up and educated in the courts of christian princes, that they may maintain the dignity of his family, (which is of great antiquity and rank among us,) and at the same time acquire such knowledge as may be an honour to themselves, and bring some advantage to their common country. It is fitting too, that christian princes should forward the wishes of this excellent and most godly nobleman ; which I tliink your clemency will do the more readily, as having heretofore experienced in your own person*, what labours and what dangers must be encountered by those, who, having embraced Christ Jesus with true faith, endea- vour to promote his glory. You will therefore do, most illustrious prince, as you have often done already, and aid this excellent young nobleman in obtaining a situation worthy of his family and parentage, either with her most serene majesty, or with some other illustrious prince. Which if your clemency will accomplish, you will do an act most acceptable to God, and will perpetually bind to you a most godly nobleman, and will especially commend yourself to my countrymen by this new instance of your beneficence. May Almighty God graciously preserve your clemency, and direct you by his Spirit to the glory of his name ! Amen. Zurich, July 17, 1573. R. GuALTER. TESTIMONIAL OF THE BARON OF ALT-SAX. To all the faithful in Christ, to whom these present letters testi- monial shall come, Lam-ence Ilumfrey, vice-chancellor, or commis- sary of the most noble the earl of Leicester in the fair university of Oxford, wishes health in the Author of salvation. [■i The earl of Bedford, when lord Russell, had been committed to tho Fleet at the accession of queen Mary. The martyr, Bradford, addressed two letters to him, " being then in trouble for tho verity of God's gospel." He afterwards went abroad, and stayed some time at Zurich. See his cha- racter described by Whetstone, in the Mirror, &c. of Francis Eaii of Bedford, printed in Parke's Hcliconia. London, 1815.] 424 R. GUALTER TO THE EARL OF BEDFORD. [lET. Whereas a few months since the noble and iUustrious lord John Philip of Alt-Sax, free baron of Saxony and Forsteck, &c. in Switzerland, &c. arrived in this university ; and, having had fkmi- liar intercourse with the most learned men in this university for four months, has exhibited many proofs of his rare and singular attainments ; so that he may be regarded as truly noble, not only on account of his illustrious family, but by reason of his erudition and excellent endowments of understanding ; it hath seemed good to our university, in testimony not only of its love towards him, but of its judgment respecting him, on this 18th day of May, in the year of our Lord 1574, to distinguish and adorn the same with the title of master in arts, to the end that he may not here-^ after forget our good-will towards him, and that we may perpe- tually enjoy the remembrance of our knowledge of him. And whereas he is at length desirous of visiting his native country, Ave, out of our affection towards him, have not thought fit that he should depart without our testimony. All and each of these things therefore Ave duly signify to you by these presents, confirmed under the seal of office of the chancellorship of Oxford, in testimony of all and singular the premises. Dated July 30th, in the year of our Lord 1574. CLXXVII. BISHOP PILKINGTON TO R. GUALTER. [A. 110.] Juhj 20, 1573. Jesus. Much health. If the same proportion of leisure and health were afforded me to read what you with unwearied labour have committed to the press, as there has been time and strength allotted you to write, I should indeed think myself a happy man ; but since I am prevented from being able to do so by my frequent infirmities, and, besides the daily care of the churches and pubKc business, am perpetually struggling with disease and death, I con- gratulate the church of God, in the defence of Avhich you arc so great and so active a labourer, (though in this old age of the Avorld and my OAvn declining years I grieve for myself, as one who can scarcely hope to enjoy the agreeable fruits of your exertions ;) and I wish you the years of Nestor, that you may be enabled the more successfully to complete what you have so successfully begun. How many are greatly delighted Avith your most learned commen- taries, and especially your Inst upon both the epistles to the Corin- thians, (for which also I return you individually my Avarmest CLXXVII.] BISHOP PILKINGTON TO K. GUALTER. 425 thanks,) I am unwilling now to tell you by recounting them ; nei- ther will I declare how highly I think of them, lest I should seem rather to be a vain flatterer than one who sincerely praises you to your face. Go on as you have begun. Exalt the Lord God in your writings ; edify the church by explaining her mysteries, in- struct the unlearned, excite the learned to exertion ; exhort, advise, rebuke each ; and you will have the Lord, who is the universal inspector of all mankind, as the most ample approver and rewarder of the labours you have bestowed in the dressing of his vineyard. But here, I pray you, pause awhile with me, and mourn over this our church at this time so miserably divided, not to say, wholly rent in pieces. Commend her to the Lord your God, and entreat him that, having compassion upon us, he may very soon provide some godly remedy for the healing of her wounds, that she may not be utterly destroyed. Your prudence has heard, I well know, and that often enough to weary you, of that unhappy dispute among some of our friends respecting the affair of the habits and the dress of the clergy, and how great a disturbance it had excited ; but it has now so broken out afresh, nay more, that which hereto- fore lurked in dissimulation has now so openly discovered itself, that not only the habits, but our whole ecclesiastical polity, disci- pline, the revenues of the bishops, ceremonies or public forms of worship, liturgies, voca,tion of ministers, or the ministration of the sacraments, — all these things are now openly attacked from the press, and it is contended with the greatest bitterness, that they are not to be endured in the church of Christ. The doctrine alone they leave untouched : as to every thing else, by whatever name you call it, they are clamorous for its removal. The godly mourn, the papists exult, that we are now fighting against each other, who were heretofore wont to attack them with our united forces ; the weak know not what or whom to believe ; the godless are altogether insensible to any danger ; the Romish priesthood are gaping for the prey, and are like bellows carefully blowing up the flame, that the mischief may increase. It is lamentable to behold, and dread- ful to hear of such things taking place among those who profess the same religion ; and yet the entire blame is laid upon the bishops, as if they alone, if they chose, were able to eradicate all these evils. We endure, I must confess, many things against our incli- nations, and groan under them, which if we wished ever so much, no entreaty can remove. We are under authority, and cannot make any innovation without the sanction of the queen, or abrogate any thing without the authority of the laws ; and the only alterna- 426 BISHOP PILKINGTON TO K. GUALTER. [lET. tive now allowed us is, whether we will bear with these things or disturb the peace of the church. I wish all parties would under- stand and follow your wholesome advice in your j^reface to the Epistle to the Corinthians, respecting the variety of rites and disci- pline in individual churches. But these men are crying out that nothing is to be endured in the rites of the church, which is later than the times of the apostles, and that all our disciphne must be derived from thence, and this at the peril of the soul and our eter- nal salvation. Accept, I pray you, in good part these few crowns in token of my regard for you and for your sound doctrine. I would have offered more, but we are making a collection for the poor French^ [protestants], who, exiled and plundered of their property, have taken refuge partly at Geneva, and partly in this country. You will learn from the accompanying verses all that has been done in Scotland. I saUite in the Lord all your brethren in the ministry, and especially the reverend master Bulhnger, to whom I beg my excuses for not have written to him individually ; and I pray, that since you are both but one, you will be satisfied with this one letter. Communicate it, if you please, to him, that he may sympa- thise and condole in our misfortunes. May the Lord Jesus long preserve happy Zurich in her ancient peace and the fear of God ! Farewell in the Lord, my very dear brother in Christ. July 20, 1573. The great admirer of your learning and piety, James Pilkington, Dunelm. CLXXVIII. R. GUALTER, JUN. TO J. SIMLER. [B. 90.] Oxford, Jiily 20, 1573. Health. Your letter, my honoured relative, was delivered to me by master William Barlow, with whom I had been long since very intimate at Heidelberg. I understood from it that you \} The case of the French Church in London had been before recom- mended by the queen to the archbishop of Canterbury and other bishops in 1569, on the breaking out of the thii-d civil war in Franco between the papists and the confederate protestants. The archbishop recommended the case to the dean and chapter of Cantcrbm-y, in whose register this order is extant : " Anno 1569, June 8, agreed, that there shall be, at the contemplation of the lord archbishop his grace's letters, given out of the church treasury to the poor [afflicted] French Church in London, towards their relief, six pounds, thirteen shillings and fourpencc." Strypo, Annals, i. ii. 290.] CLXXVIII.] R. GUALTEK, JUN. TO J. SIMLER. 427 had been disturbed, and not without reason, by the eahimnies of some sciohsts here, who, most ilhterate as tliey are tlicmselves, will give liking unto nothing that is not ornamented, and pohshed, and perfect in every respect. But since it is impossible to satisfy them all, we ought to consider ourselves as having sufficiently per- formed our duty by commending our endeavours and anxiety for the advancement of learning to the approbation of those who are most worthy. Among the Oxford men, to whom I joined myself in the month of June, there are fewer of this class ; partly be- cause they are more simple, and partly because the university abounds with papists, and but few persons devote themselves to the purer faith ; so that they will not even look into the writings of our countrymen, for which reason every ground and handle for this particular way of calumniating is cut off from them. But I have dwelt too much upon this, and especially with you, my most learned relative, whom I know, both in this place and every where else, to be very dear to all good men. A few days afterwards your other letter was brought me, in which you accuse me of neghgence, for neither having bought the cloth, nor sent you any letter. As to the last charge, I know that I am very easily accused of neglect, especially when I am innocent. But I suppose you have by this time received my letter by Chevalier, who was prevented by bad weather from coming over to you sooner. As to the first charge, when I first arrived in England, I could do but httle with Hilles, who, as he has always this maxim in his mouth, that money is to the merchant ivhat the plough is to the farmer^ will do nothing without ready money. And as in yom* later letters to me you made no mention of the subject, I thought you had changed your mind, and that the cloth was no longer wanted. However, when master Wilham Barlow passed through this place on his way back, he took the whole charge upon himself, and promised that he would manage the matter with some mer- chants in London of his acquaintance. Had I had an opportunity of going to London myself, I would willingly have executed this commission for you. But as Barlow has undertaken it, I do not consider there is any occasion for my assistance. With respect to my situation at Magdalene college, of which Humphrey is president, I am living at Oxford very comfortably. For there is both an abundance of learned men, and I acknowledge myself very much indebted to them for their smgular regard to me. But the especial kindness of masters Humphrey^ and Cole, to whom [2 See below, Letter CLXXXI. p. 432, n. 3.] 428 R. GUALTER, JUN. TO J. SIMLER. [lET. I was recommended by master Parkhurst, outshines all the rest. And because this university is more agreeable to me than Cam- bridge, with the view of living here more comfortably, and with greater honour, I have solicited the degree of master of arts, which was conferred upon me on the 6th of July, with the unanimous consent of the senate of the university ; and for the completion of this degree, I am next week to hold public lectures, both in moral and natural philosophy. May God prosper my undertaking and direct all my endeavours to the glory of his name ! But I am now desirous of staying here longer than I had intended, partly on account of my degree, and partly by reason of its great con- venience. For master Parkhurst has so recommended me to Hum- phrey, that he has taken upon himself the charge of all my expenses, which he is to receive from him again ; so that I shall be able from henceforth to reside here without any cost to my father, which I have hitherto been unable to do by reason of the uncertainty of my expenses. But I request you, my honoured relative, (for it will be of great use to me in my studies,) always to persuade and advise (my father) against my being recalled home sooner than is expedient. For should I be recalled sooner than I expect, my father might probably complain of my want of obedience in that respect. But I well know that both my father and your- self, and all of you will so manage these things, that I have no need to give myself any trouble about them. I will not, therefore, write more, especially at present ; and I beg you will be satisfied with this, and love me, as you do. ilay Almighty God long pre- serve you in safety with your wife and children ! Dated at Oxford, from Magdalene college, July 20, 1573. Your most attached relative, RoDOLPH GuALTER, the younger. TESTIMONIAL OF RODOLPH GUALTER THE YOUNGER. To all the faithful in Christ, to whom these presents shall come. Laurence Humphrey, vice-chancellor, or commissary of the most illustrious earl of Leicester in the fair university of Oxford, wishes perpetual health in the Lord. As nothing is more agreeable to justice and equity than to bear testimony to the truth, for the lack of which the innocence of in- dividuals is for the most part attacked and Aveakcned by false accusations through the injuries of calumniators ; hence it is that, moved by the request of our beloved brother in Christ, liodolph Gualtcr of Zurich, we bring to the knowledge of your university, CLXXVlll.l R. GUALTEK, JUN. TO J. SIMLER. -129 and desire to make known to you by these presents, that the afore- said Rodolph Gualter has been a scholar of our university for two entire years last past, and has devoted himself to learning in Mag- dalene college with no less success than diligence, laudably con- ducting himself in the mean while. Whence, in acknowledgement of his merits, this young man, amiable for his candour, and re- spectable in station, as bearing and representing not only the name, but the virtuous example of his most accomplished and exemplary father, master Rodolph Gualter, professor at Zm-ich, was created master of arts at our famous commemoration, on the 12th of October, 1573. And forasmuch as he is now desirous of visiting his father and his country, we, m manifestation of our regard for him, would not allow him to leave us without our testimonial. All and singular which we signify to you faithfully by these presents, under the official seal of the chancellorship of Oxford, in testimony of all and each of the premises. Dated July 30, a.d. 1574. CLXXIX. SIR J. WOLLEYi TO J. STURMIUS. [B. 01.] Orpington, July 24, 1573. I HAVE been induced, accomplished Sturmius, to write to you at this present time at the desire of my singular good patron, the earl of Leicester ; who, as he himself was writing to you about other matters, wished me also to open the way to your friendship and correspondence by a letter of my own. And this I do with the greatest readiness. For as I have succeeded your friend Ascham in his office about the queen's majesty, so am I exceedingly anxious to be the inheritor also of his friendships and intimacies, and especially with yourself. Receive me therefore in Ascham's place ; for though I am far inferior to him in ability and learning, yet I will endeavour to excel him in his love and respect for you. The noble carl has wished me to write to you at this time (although -we are now booted and just setting out on a journey) about a matter of no [1 Sir John WoUcy was secretary in the French and Latin tongues to queen Elizabeth, in the latter of which offices he succeeded Roger Ascham. The queen was now on a progress through Kent. She set out from Green- wich, July 14th ; thence to Croydon, to the archbishoirs house, Avhoro she stayed seven days : thence to Orpington, the house of Sir Perceval Hart, from whence this letter was written, the original of which is preserved at Strasburgh. See Strypo, Ann. ii. i. 465.] 430 SIR J. WOLLEY TO J. STURMIUS. [lET. great importance, but Avhich, however, is exciting great disturbances among us. A great question has for a long time, as I think you are aware, been moved among us, whether ministers and preachers of the word ought to be bound by pubhc authority to use a certain kind of habit, especially such an one as the mass-priests used in the papacy : which dispute is so agitated among us, that many parties have chosen to relinquish the preaching of the gospel, and are rehnquishing it every day, rather than be obliged to adopt that kind of habit. This affair has certainly occasioned great disorders among us, and the contest has hitherto increased by debate. The most noble earl therefore is anxiously desirous that you shoidd propose some method of allaying this dispute, which is now so rife, by procuring the opinions of the most learned divines of Germany, especially Beza, Gualter, and others of great note, upon this matter, to be written to our universities. On this subject I will write more at another time : now the departure of the queen from this place is so full of hurry, as scarcely to have allowed me to write even thus much. You will excuse the haste of this letter, which I have written at the command of the earl, and reckon me among your most loving friends. And this I earnestly and repeat- edly request of you. Farewell, most accomplished sir. Dated at Orpington, a village in the county of Kent. July 24, 1573. Your most devoted, John Wolley. CLXXX. W. COLE TO R. GUALTER. [B. 92.] Oxford, July 20, 1573. The kindness, most honoured sir, which I experienced from you beyond all others at Zurich, can never escape from my memory ; wherefore I wish you to believe, that, although I am very far removed from you in person, in mind and inchnation I shall always be a Zuricher. And if all persons ought to be had in the highest esteem by me from the very circumstance of their be- longing to Zurich, much more is your son to bo regarded with the greatest affection. For besides his being a Zuricher, the piety and friendship of his father makes him more acceptable to me, as the learning of his father docs to all godly persons. For as often as your works are placed before the eyes of the godly for perusal, so often is the son of such a father held up to commendation. In the year now passed, when your son was present at our commeraora- CLXXX.] W. COLK TO R. GUALTER. 481 tion, I could not refrain from doing you some little kindness. For as soon as I saw him, there came into my mind, I know not how, the various favours you bestowed on us Englishmen now many years ago. Wherefore I now plainly perceive it impossible that such great obligations can ever be forgotten by me ; so fresh and grateful was the recollection of them. The bishop of Norwich, a man on all accounts to be honoured by me, has written, to me ; and I learn from his letter how much your son is beloved by him ; so that I dare affirm, that, though you are absent in Switzerland, the bishop of Norwich will no less give his assistance to your son in every respect, than if you were at hand to provide for him your- self. You must understand therefore, in few words, that your Gualter will always be beloved by me, and that I shall never be ■wanting to his interests. There is scarcely any news stirring among us. I hear that a city in Holland, called Haerlem\ has at length, after a long block- ade, in spite of the opposition of the Spaniards, introduced some reinforcements from England and Scotland, and that by this means ample provision is made for the inhabitants in respect of the neces- saries of life. And this took place some days since, not without some slaughter on both sides. Some of our nobility" are making preparations for a great expedition into Ireland, and are all now on their journey thither. There is a great union of opinion between us and the Scots ; and the protestants of that country, with our assistance, have this summer reduced the well-fortified castle of Edinburgh ^ Their queen is in this country with a certain noble- man*, to whose faithful custody she is committed, so as not to be [1 The siege of Haerlem lasted ten months ; the to\Tnsmen, before they capitulated, being reduced to eat the vilest animals, and even leather and grass.] [2 Namely, the earl of Essex, the lords Darcy and Rich, and others. They went on an expedition into Ireland against Brian Mac Phelim, who had raised a rebellion in Ulster. They arrived at Knockfergus towards the end of August. See Camden's Elizabeth, p. 201.] [3 Edinburgh castle was taken on the 2Sth of May, after having held out against the English upwards of a month, by Sir W. Drm-y M'ith fifteen hun- dred men, and the Scottish auxihary forces. See Camden's Elizabeth, p. 197.] [■* The queen of Scots was at this time at Sheffield castle, under the custody of the earl of Shrewsbury, who in a letter to lord Bm-ghley, dated Sept. 24, 1572, says, " This queen remains still within these fom- walls in sure keeping. She is much offended at my restraint froni her walking without this castle ; but for all her anger, I will not sulfer her to pass one of these gates until I have contrary commandment expressly from tho queen's majesty. 432 W. COLE TO K. GUALTEK. [lET. able to go abroad without his permission, and without a sufficient o-uard. I have nothing to write respecting the French affairs. Every thing at Rochelle^ is as yet in a state of uncertainty. I pray you, sir, to salute very much in my name the venerable father, master Bullmger, and the rest of your fellow-ministers. May Christ preserve you ! July 26, 1573. Your most devoted, William Cole. CLXXXI. L. HUMPHREY TO R. GUALTER. [A. 111.] Oxford, Jul^ 28, 1573. Immanuel. Tour son Gualter, together with your letter, came to me at Oxford. He is the very image of yourself, and a true Zuinglian". He is living in Magdalene college, agreeable to my- self, acceptable to my friends, and welcome to the university. The Earl of Bedford, and Parkhurst, your friend and our bishop, re- verenced by me on many accounts, have given him letters of intro- duction ; so that both for your sake and at the request of these distinguished men, I have admitted him to my friendship and to my college, congratulating myself that I have such an inmate^. And though I was fully persuaded that my number of soldiers was sufficient for her safe keeping, yet have I thought good this time to increase the same with thirty soldiers more. See Lodge, i. 550, and above, Letter CLIX. p. 382, n. 2.] [1 The to\vn of Rochelle was the principal rendezvous of the French Protestants, who established themselves there after the massacres of the jireceding year. The duke of Anjou besieged it early in the spring, and after some months' investment by the best troops and chief nobility of France, the loss of forty thousand by disease and casualty, and a ruinous expenditm-e both of stores and money, he was forced to compromise, the announcement of his election to the tlu'one of Poland permitting a negotiation, without the shame of acknowledging a defeat : a treaty was therefore concluded towards the end of Juno, which secured to all protestants liberty of conscience, but freedom of worship was confined to Rochelle, Nismes, and Montaubari. For an account of the siege see Smedlcy's Hist, of the Reformation in France, Vol. 11. ch. xii. and the authorities there referred to ; also Browning's Hist. of the Huguenots, p. 102.] [2 His mother was the daughter of Zuinglius. See p. 39, n. 4.] [3 Parkhurst wrote to Gualter himself, being upon his departure to Oxford ; " When you come to Oxford, you shall be provided with all things. If any thing bo wanting at any time, I have written now once again to l)r Umphrey and Mr Cole, to provide the same for you. And at one of their hands you shall receive what you have need of; and I will sec the same dis- cliarged." Ho concluded his hotter with his counsel : '" If you apply yourself CLXXXI.] L. HUMPHREY TO R. GUALTER. 433 Parkhurst most fully promises to supply him with every thing ne- cessary, and I willingly offer my aid and assistance to contribute in any way to the benefit of so excellent a youth. For I both love the ingenuous manners and frank disposition of the man, and confess that I owe every thing to such a father, who has employed so many days and nights in raising up children of the gospel, and in planting a nursery of the christian church. Persevere in em- ploying yourself in that holy work ; that while time is afforded us, we may still defend the purity of religion, and illustrate that truth which has hitherto, through ignorance or malice, been hidden in the dark den of the Romanists. For it is most delightful to con- tinue singing even unto grey hairs ; and hence the voice of the aged, like the descant of the swan, is sweetest and most solemn. For this it is that a talent is bestowed on you by the Lord ; for this, peace and leisure and retirement are afforded you ; for this, the convenience of a most excellent press, that in this abundance of every thing, and with tliis best of opportunities, you may be of use to us Britons, divided as we are from all the world, and stand- ing in need of almost all these means of assistance. However, by the blessing of God, all things are now at peace among us, not- withstanding our neighbour's house is on fire. For the torch of civil war in France and Flanders is not yet put out, although a conference is being held respecting some honourable conditions of peace. In Scotland, the virgin castle of Edinburgh*, (for so the Scots called it,) albeit hitherto unconquered, is at last reduced and taken. Our queen ^ subdued it, not for herself, but for the young king. to your studies, and do well, you shall want nothing, but shall find me, not a friend only, but another father unto you. God keep you, and give you grace to do that becometh you, to his glory, and all your friends' comfort." See Strype, Ann. n. i. 337.] [4 The castle surrendered on the 28th of May, being the 33rd day of the siege; for an account of which see Camden's Elizabeth, p. 197.] [5 Sir Thomas Smith was earnest with the queen, to send aid to reduce the rebels in Scotland, who had fortified Edinburgh Castle against the king and regent ; and for that purpose he let the queen understand from Mr Killigrew her ambassador in Scotland, how dangerously things stood there, and therefore that it was his desire that the peace-makers (as he phrased it) might shortly be transported thither ; to whom, when the queen asked, " who be they?" "Marry," said he, "your majesty's cannons; they must doit, and make a final conclusion." " Then," said the queen, " I wan-ant you, and that shortly." Strype, Life of Smith, 129. See Smith's Letter to Lord Burghley, MS. Ilarl. 6991, 14.] 28 434 L. HUMPHREY TO K. GUALTER. [lET. Their queen, therefore, being kept in custody in this country, and all the conspirators having either surrendered or been destroyed, not only a mutual alhance is taking place among us, but the same religion received by universal consent is prospering in that king- dom. May the Lord Jesus preserve, and load with every blessing, both yourself and your friends, masters Bullinger, Simler, Lavater, &c. and the whole church ! In haste, in the midst of our Magda- lene commemoration. Oxford, July 28, 1573. Your most devoted, Laurence Humphrey, CLXXXII. ARCHBISHOP GRINDAL TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 112.] York, July 31, 1573. Health in Christ ! About the end of December last, my dearest master BulHnger, I received your letter written on the 24th of August; on wliich day, by a savage and unheard of cruelty, the AdmiraP with other nobility, and the greatest part of the faithful, were massacred at Paris. These are the fruits of that egregious treaty with France, from which we expected so much advantage ! The Sicilian Vespers^ indeed were infamous of old ; but these French Matins, if I may so call them, leave them far behind. The Lord beholds these things, and will make inquisition. Many exiles^ from France have sought refuge in London, and among them many ministers of the churches, who are there kindly received with hospitality, and supported by the alms of the godly. Our affairs, after the settlement of the controversy respecting ceremonies, were for some time very quiet : when some virulent pamphlets* came forth, privately printed, contrary to law, in which \} Viz. Coligni. " Dc Thou, perhaps, falls short rather than exceeds in his computation, when he fixes the whole number of Huguenots who perished, at little below thirty thousand : of that number at least one-third may be allotted to Paris." See Smedley's Hist, of the Reformed Religion in France, Vol. II. p. 34, and the testimonies there cited.] [2 The massacre of the French in Sicily on Easter Monday, March 30, 1282.] [3 Seep. 426, n. 1.] \} The admonition to the Parliament, soon after the publishing of it, was backed with tliree other pamphlets, sent to Dr Whitgift, as it were a challenge ; which he briefly answered towards the end of his answer to the admonition. The first was a pi-eface to the other two. The second was called, An Exlwrtatiun to the Bishops to deal brotherly luith their brethren. The third. Ah Exhortation to the Bishops and their Clergy to answer a little Book CLXXXII.] ARCHBISHOP GRINDAL TO H. BULLINGER. 435 almost the whole external pohty of our church was attacked. For they maintain that archbishops and bishops should altogether be reduced to the ranks ; that the ministers of the church ought to be elected solely by the people ; that they ought all to be placed upon an equality; that in every city, town, parish, or village, a consistory should be established, consisting of the minister and elders of the place, who alone are to decide upon all ecclesiastical affairs : (they state) that the church of England has scarcely the appearance of a christian church, — that no set form of prayer ought to be prescribed, but that in the holy assemblies each minis- ter should pray as the Holy Ghost may dictate; that the infants of popish recusants, as far as the use of baptism is concerned, are unclean, (I use their own words,) but yet that they are not on that account to be excluded from the election of God, I pass over many things which it would be tedious to recount. But a royal edict was lately published, in which hbels of this sort are forbidden to be circulated for the future ; which circumstance, as I hope, will retard their endeavours. They are young men who dissemi- nate these opinions, and they have their supporters, especially from among those who are gaping for ecclesiastical property : but yet I am glad to say, that Humphrey, and Sampson, and some others, who heretofore moved the question about ceremonies, are entii'cly opposed to this party. The castle of Edinburgh in Scotland, about which I before wrote, having been battered for twenty successive days by our English cannon, was at length forced to surrender on the 28th of May last. The cliief rebels^ were punished ; so that at this time the whole of Scotland is reduced to obedience under the young king, and is altogether alienated from the French, both on account of the difference of religion, and the cruelty which was last year exercised towards the faithful ; but most devoted to our queen (who has so often defended the liberties of the Scots,) as you may easily sec by the inclosed verses, printed at Edinburgh. The affairs of France are sufficiently known to you. In Holland and Zealand the prince of Orange is superior in his navy, that came forth the last Parliament ; and to the other brethren, to judge of it by God's word, until they see it answered; and not be carried away with any respect of men. See Strype, Life of Whitgift, Vol. i. p. 80, &c. who gives a full account of the above writings.] [5 '• Gningo and his brothei', with eleven Scots goldsmiths, were hanged at Edinburgh." Lord Burghley to the Earl of Shrewsbury, in Lodge, Vol. II. p. 33.] 28—2 436 ARCHBISHOP GRINDAL TO H. BIJLLINCiER. [lET. but on land the contest is always doubtful. May the Lord take compassion on his church, and at length put an end to these evils, that we may with one mouth glorify him, whom I pray very long to preserve your piety in safety to his church ! York, the last day of July, 1573. Your most devoted in the Lord, Edmund York. P. S. It was my intention, God willing, to have sent you at the spring fair some httle remembrance of me, which however was not ready at that time through the neglect of the workman. CLXXXIII. ARCHBISHOP GRINDAL TO R. GUALTER. QA. 113.] YoiiK, July 31, 1573. Health in Christ, my very dear master Gualter ! Your desire that your lately pubhshed Homilies on the first Epistle to the Corinthians should appear under my name and that of some other very dear brethren and fellow-labourers, was very gratifying to me ; and on that account, as far as concerns myself, (and I hope the others will do the same,) I return your piety my best thanks. Your son sent me two copies bound, one of which 1 forwarded to the lord bishop of Durham, to whom, as he writes me word, the present was most acceptable ; the other I retain myself. There is no reason why you should be so careful to apologize for your free- dom in writing to me. For although you are not personally known to me, you are well known to me by your writings, abounding as they do in singular erudition and learning ; and on account of the excellent piety which they breathe, and I will add too, on account of our most close agreement in the true doctrine of Christ, you are most dear to me. As I am myself far distant from Cambridge, I have earnestly recommended your son to Dr John Whitgift, the master of his college' ; whom I have also requested to shew himself a sufficiently severe censor of his morals, should there be any occasion for his doing so. But I hope there will be no occasion for this ; for I hear that your son is very studious and modest, and far removed from all levity of conduct. I wrote a few lines to Bullinger respecting our affairs, which he doubtless will communicate to you. I wrote likewise to Richard Hilles, a merchant of London, that he should take care to transmit [' i. o. Trinity College.] CLXXXIII.] ARCHBISHOP GRINDAL TO E. GUALTER. 437 to you, at the next Frankfort fair, fifty French crowns ; namely, thirty from myself, and the remaining twenty^ from the bishop of Durham, whose letter you will receive at the same time with this. We pray you to take in good part this little present. Farewell in Christ, my very dear brother in the Lord. York, the last day of July, 1573. Yours in Christ, Edmund York. CLXXXIV. R. C00CH3 TO R. GUALTER. [B. 95.] V Queen's Palace, Aug. 13, 1573. I AM compelled by the force of conscience to declare my senti- ments, and that upon a most important matter and singular mystery. My remarks relate to the last supper of Christ; in the adminis- tration of wliich a mistake is made now-a-days, and ever has been made, almost from the time of St Paul; since he placed before the Corintliians a supper to be eaten, we only a morsel of bread in mockery of a supper. They used a variety and abundance of meat and drink, so as to depart satisfied ; we return home hungry. And as Paul blames too dainty a table, so also does he a too sparing and scanty one. Moderation is best. Neither did our forefathers, who lived before the birth of Christ, practise that abstinence, which is rather a fast than a dinner or a supper ; inas- much as they partook of the [paschal] lamb. It is not to be behoved, that Christ would take such pains to have a supper pre- pared in the guest-chamber at Jerusalem, and invite so many guests, and yet place nothing before them but a most minute morsel of bread and three drops of wine. It is your part, who have brought forth into the hght and view of mankind so many excellent works, to wipe away, or altogether remove these blemishes of error and superstition. And this you have admirably effected in your explanation of those epistles in which Paul ad- dressed the Corintliians; in which you have chastised the arro- gance of the popes, and the thunders of the papists, and the extraordinary excommunication and separation of the Calvinists. [2 Seo p. 426.] [3 Robert Cooch, or Cooke, had been keeper of the wine-celkar to Edward VI. He denied the propriety of infant-baptism, in defence of Avhich Peter Martyr wrote a long letter to him. Martyr, Ep. 34. Dr Turner also wrote a book against him, in which he confuted his opinion respecting original sin. Ho was among the exiles under queen Mary, when ho became acquainted with Rodolph Gualter. He Avas now, 1573, one of the gentlemen of the queen's chapel. Seo Strypo, Mem. u. 1. 111.] 438 E. COOCH TO R. GUALTER. [lET. As I will stand or fall by your opinion as to the manner and method of the supper and the table, so I very much dissent from Beza and others as to the day when Christ took supper with his disciples. For they assign the supper to the fourteenth day, I to the thirteenth, in which, according to the law, the old passover was not to be sacrificed ^ Christ therefore instituted a new passover in remembrance of his death, and did not eat any other that night with his disciples. I have written some pages upon these subjects, which I intend to print ; but I anxiously desire the interposition of your opinion beforehand. And, indeed, nothing can be printed here in England without the licence of the bishops. Wherefore I request you, if possible, to write in return, and let me know what you think it would be best for me to do. Farewell. From the queen's palace. Aug. 13, 1573. Your very loving Robert Cooch. CLXXXV. BISHOP SANDYS TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 114.] LoNDOV, Aug. 15, 1573. On many accounts, most esteemed sir, I am greatly in your debt ; both because you have always regarded me with the greatest kindness and affection, and because you have condescended to write to me so diligently and so frequently. For all which things, though I cannot make an equal return, yet I will thank you as much as I can, and shall at all times readily acknowledge myself very much indebted to you for your pecuhar kindness. You must not impute it to neglect that I so seldom write to you, but to the infrequency of the means of communication between us, especially in these most turbulent times, when war and tumults and slaughter are every where rife. For there is no one to whom I should write with greater pleasure than to master Bullinger, whom, as I have always loved him exceedingly for his great [1 Gualter in his reply says, of the question concerning the day of Easter, hanc difficultatem curiosam potius quam utilem esse ; " this difficulty is more cm'ious than useful." He disagi-ees with him also on the other point, and says, Nimis argutum est, quod ad Hebraismum confagis, et sub panis vocabulo omne genus eiborum intelligi debere dicis : " Your having recourse to an He- braism, and saying that under the term bread all kinds of food ought to be comprehended, savours of too great nicety." The letter is very long, and entirely occupied in arguing these points. MS. note by Rev. Steuart A. Pears.] OLXXXV.] BISHOP SANDYS TO H. BULLINGER. 439 courtesy, so have I also much venerated for his singular erudition, and rare piety, and other excellent qualities. For when I call to my remembrance, as I very often do, with how much favour and regard I was entertained by you, how like a brother and a friend you treated me when an exile, and the comfort in which I seemed to myself to live among you, I wish for nothing more than that, reUeved from those cares and anxieties with which I am now over- whelmed, I might pass the remainder of my Ufe at Zurich as a sojourner and private person. Thoughts of this kind are continu- ally occurring to me ; nor is there any thing that I should wish for more. But I perceive that this cannot be. I am not born for myself: our church, which is most sadly tossed about in these evil times, and is in a most vrretched state of confusion, vehemently demands all my exertions ; I dare not desert the spouse of Christ in her danger ; for conscience would cry out against me, and con- vict me of having betrayed her. New orators are rising up from among us, foolish young men, who while they despise authority, and admit of no superior, are seeking the complete overthrow and rooting up of our whole ecclesiastical poHty, so piously constituted and confirmed, and established by the entire consent of most ex- cellent men ; and are striving to shape out for us, I know not what new platform of a church. And you would not imagine with what approbation this new face of things is regarded, as well by the people as the nobility. The people are fond of change, and seek after liberty ; the nobiUty [seek for] what is useful. These good folks promise both, and that in abundance. But that you may be better acquainted with the whole matter, accept this summary of the question at issue reduced under certam heads : 1. The civil magistrate has no authority in ecclesiastical matters. He is only a member of the church, the government of which ought to be committed to the clergy. 2. The church of Christ admits of no other government than that by presbyteries ; viz. by the minister, elders, and deacon. 3. The names and authority of archbishops, archdeacons, deans, chancellors, commissaries, and other titles and dignities of the Hke kind, should be altogether removed from the church of Christ. 4. Each parish should have its own presbytery. 5. The choice of ministers of necessity belongs to the people. 6. The goods, possessions, lauds, revenues, titles, honours, authorities, and all other things relating either to bishops or cathc- 440 BISHOP SANDYS TO H. BULLINGEK. [lET. drals, and which now of right belong to them, should be taken away forthwith and for ever. 7. No one should be allowed to preach who is not a pastor of some congregation ; and he ought to preach to his own flock ex- clusively, and no where else. 8. The infants of papists are not to be baptized. 9. The judicial laws of Moses are binding upon christian princes, and they ought not in the slightest degree to depart from them. There are many other things of the same kind, not less absurd, and which I shall not mention; none of which, as far as I can judge, will make for the advantage and peace of the church, but for her ruin and confusion. Take away authority, and the people will rush headlong into every thing that is bad. Take away the patrimony of the church, and you will by the same means take away not only sound learning, but religion itself. But I seem perhaps to prejudge the matter. I anxiously desire, most learned sir, to hear your opinion, and those of masters Gualter, Simler, and the rest of the brethren, respecting these things ; which for my own part I shall willingly follow, as being sound and agreeable to the word of God. For if the whole matter in controversy were left to your arbitration, it would doubtless much contribute to the peace of our church. These good men are crying out that they have all the reformed churches on their side. I say notliing of the state of our commonwealth : every thing is quiet hitherto, but it is to be feared that these intestine dis- sensions may tend at length to the ruin of the country. I send your reverence as much English cloth as will make you a gown. Make use of it, I pray you, and accept it with your wonted kindness. Farewell, most esteemed sir, and commend me, I pray you, to God in your prayers. In haste. London, England, Aug. 15, 1573. Your brother in Christ, Edwin Sandys, bishop of London. CLXXXVI. R. GUALTER TO BISHOP COX. [B. 94.] Zurich, Aug. 2G, 1573. Health. It is with great pleasure, reverend father in Christ, that I have learned both from your letter ' and those of others, that the mark of respect by which I gave public attestation of my [1 See above, Letter CLXXV. p. 420.] CLXXXVI.] R. GUALTEK TO BISHOP COX. 441 regard for yourselves and the Anglican ehurclies in the dedication of my homilies''^ on the first epistle to the Corinthians, was accept- able to you and to your colleagues. I have learned it too, by a letter from my son, who is most earnest in his praises of your liberality towards himself; for which, as also for the remembrance^ which you write word you have sent me, I return my thanks to your reverence, not such as you deserve, or as I wish, but such as I can ; and at the same time I pray Almighty God to afford me some op- portunity of shewing that I am not unmindful of the favours which you have conferred upon me and upon my son. He will remain among you till the spring, and it is necessary that he should do so, since the letter in which I inform him of my wishes, will scarcely reach him before November, after the [autumn] fair [at Frankfort] ; at which season a sea voyage is far from agreeable, and not alto- gether safe. But at the beginning of spring, should nothing happen to prevent it, he will cross over into Denmark, where I have recommended him to my particular friend, master Erasmus Lastus, a divine of the university of Copenhagen, who lately passed through this place from Venice, and promised me his services in entertain- ing him and sending him on to Rostock ; from whence, after havinc also visited the Saxon universities, namely, Wittemberg and Leipsic, he will, if it so please God, return home to me. Meanwhile, I request you will proceed as you have hitherto done, and keep an eye to him and his studies, that he may not idly lose his time, nor be corrupted by evil habits. But to return to your letter, in which also you mention that of mine*, in which I gave you the reason of my having written to master Parkhurst, bishop of Norwich, on the subject of your con- troversies ; it distresses me exceedingly to be thus brought as it were upon the stage through your quarrels, by the publication of my letters to both parties. It was certainly very wrong and uncourteous in your opponents, to print that letter, which I had written to an old friend in all the freedom of friendship and famihar correspondence. It ought to have been enough for them, after abusing my credulity, to have extorted from mc that somewhat sharp admonition. I could more easily bear that master Whitgift^ [2 See Letter CLXXIII. p. 416, n. 2.] [3 Namely, twenty-five gulden, or about three pounds of our money. See Letter CLXXV. p. 422.] [4 See above, Letter CLXVITI. p. 404.] [s Di- Whitgift made an end of his confutation of the Admonition to Parliament in Sept. 1572. In this ho inserted the letter here mentioned, 442 R. GU ALTER TO niSHOP COX. [lKT. should insert, in his reply to your opponents, the other letter that I wrote to you on the same subject, since the necessity of the case required it ; but it is painful to me to hear them seeking from it a new occasion of complaint, or even of calumniating, as though I had now recanted in your favour what I had before stated to their satisfaction. I am comforted, however, by conscious integrity, and I hope that all considerate persons will perceive that I am very far from incurring the imputation of inconsistency. For they will see that I did not complain to my most intimate friend, without reason, of those parties who, if they acted as I am told they did, deserved a yet more severe rebuke. But when I hear that I have been im- posed upon, why should I not stand up in my own defence ? I am certainly unwilhng to be alienated from excellent and friendly men by the fickleness and peevishness of others : but as far as I can guess from your letter, they have now begun a new web^, so that I am less surprised at being* dragged on the stage by them. You ask me to reply to those nine articles, by the insisting upon which they give you so much trouble. But if these are the only matters in dispute between you, they are scarcely deserving, in my opinion, that any divine should be occupied in the refutation of them ; as they savour of nothing but a longing after innovation, and I wish they were not sprinkled with the bitterness of envy or blind emulation. I. They require the names of archbishops, bishops, and other officials, to be entirely abolished. But I wish they would act with greater modesty, and that in altering the constitution of state or church they would not assume to themselves greater piety than they possess. I by no means deny that in all governments there are many things which might be more conveniently established ac- cording to the rule of antiquity and apostolic simplicity. But since it is the misfortune of our age, that not even those princes, who have opened their doors to the gospel of Christ, will allow all things to be altered and corrected ; and as many hindrances also arise from other quarters, it appears to me better to bear with patience the imperfections of the kingdoms of this world, so long as purity of doctrine and hbcrty of conscience remain inviolate, than by dis- stating, that forasmuch as the authors of the admonition, for their better credit, had set down in print the epistles of Master Beza and Master Gualter, so he thought good to set down an epistle of Master Gualter, revoking the same upon better information ; also another of Master BuUinger, chief minister of Zurich, concerning the same cause. Strype, Wliitgift, i. 86.] [1 Gualter refers to Saunders's book, " The Monarchy of the Church. " See above. Letter CLXXIII. p. 418.] CLXXXVI.] R. GUALTER TO BISHOP COX. 443 puting about the external government of the church to bring the whole into danger. And I wonder that they entertain such an aversion to the name of bishops, which they cannot but know was in use in the time of the apostles, and always too retained in the churches in after times : we know too, that archbishops existed of old, whom they called by another name patriarchs'^. And if in later times they have occasioned so much offence, by reason of their tyranny and ambition, that these titles are, not without reason, become odious to the godly ; I do not yet see what is to hinder, that, on the removal of the abuse, those persons may be bishops, and called such, who, placed over a certain number of churches, have the management of such things as appertain to the purity of religion and doctrine. I cannot however dissemble upon this sub- ject, that there are found every where out of England pious and excellent men, yea, even some of the nobility, who blame many things in the manners and pomp of your bishops. And those who have lately come over from England (as I understand by the letters of my friends) have complained, that many harsh proceedings have been adopted there against godly and learned ministers of the word, who heretofore preached Christ not without some excellent fruit; but who now, with the connivance, yea, even with the concurrence of the bishops, are thrust into prison upon the most trifling grounds, and almost without an indictment, or at least such an one as is recognized by law. "Whether there be any truth in this report concerning you, I do not know; we certainly promise ourselves better things of you all. But if any thing of this kind should take place, I would again entreat you to consider how cautious you should be, lest, in opposition to the precept of St Peter ^ you exercise dominion over the clergy, or be of the number of those who cruelly beat their fellow-servants. You will forgive me, reverend father, this freedom of speech, for which I have no other motive but that I love you, yea, revere and respect you, and am most anxious at the same time for the honour of your reputation and for the English churches. I hope also that you will not decline any of those measures which shall seem to make for an improved [2 The name patriarch was first given to a bishop by any public authority at the council of Chalcedon (a. d. 451), which mentions the most holy patriarchs of every diocese, oo-twrarot Trarpiapxai 8ioiKi]aeas iKaa-rqs. The power itself, it is agreed on all hands, existed much earlier, and was probably confirmed at the council of Nice, A. D. 325. See Bingham's Antiquities, B. II. ch. xvii. § G, 7.] [3 1 Pot. V. 8.] 444 R. GUALTER TO BISHOP COX. [lET. state of the church. And if I well know the greater part of you, I think that you would rather, if it were possible, lay down that burden which you sustain with so great labour, and so much envy of many parties, than stand in the way of a more perfect refor- mation. But if the most serene queen and the nobles of the realm will not have the existing form of the church altered, I should wish that those other brethren of ours would bear it with patience, and not occasion you any trouble ; and that you should in your turn unite modesty and humility to your episcopal dignity, and not con- temptuously look down upon those who are labouring in the same vineyard of Christ with yourselves. II. They contend that the election of the ministers of the word ought to be restored to the people, and not to be in the hands of the bishops. But in this case also I think there is great need of prudence and moderation, lest, while we are urging an extreme right, many persons may have occasion of complaining that we have done them injustice. I confess, indeed, that in the time of the apostles teachers were elected by the pubUc consent of the whole church, and not without fasting and prayer ; as is evident in the election of Matthias, as also in the ordination of Paul and Barnabas to the gentiles. And that this method was still in use in the time of St Augustine, is testified by that letter' of his, in which he de- scribes the election of his successor Evodius. But then also it appears, that the more powerful party was that of those who were superior to the rest, either in the dignity of the apostolic name, or by reason of their office and the prerogative of their honours. And what was done by Paul is well known, who for this cause left Titus in Crete '•^, that he might ordain elders and teachers in every city. The same apostle, too, commands that all things be done decently and in order ; and I do not see how this can be the case without a certain distinction of ecclesiastical offices. But the whole order of the church has in these latter times been disturbed by the tyranny of antichrist, which the superstition of kings and "princes has con- firmed. For when these, not properly instructed in the faith of [1 The following is the passage referred to, as given by Bingham, Anti- quities, B. IV. ch. ii. §6.-4 notariis ecclesice, sicut cernitis, excipnmiur quce dicinnis, excipiuntur qiice dlcitis, et mens sermo et vestrce acclamationes in terram non cadunt Hoc ad ultinntm rogo, nt gestis istis dignemini stibscribere qui potestis. He first ordered the notaries of the church to take the acclamations of the people in writing, and then required all that could write to subscribe the instrument themselves. August. Ep. 110. (213.)] [2 See Tit. i. 5.] CLXXXVI.] R. GUALTER TO BISHOP COX. 445 Christ, imagined that their sins could be expiated by external ceremonies and the purchased prayers of others, they presently began to found convents of mass-priests, monks, and nuns, and to enrich them with the revenues arising from yearly produce and from tithes. By which means it came to pass, that, together with the tithes and other revenues of the parishes (as they call them) the right of election (which they called patronage) devolved upon the priors of convents, bishops, and abbots, and lastly, even upon abbesses ; not now to speak of others who obtained it by other means. Among us at least (to bring forward this by way of ex- ample), who by the singular mercy of God have now for fifty whole years enjoyed the free preaching of the gospel, the election of ministers in many of the parishes rests with the bishop of Constance, and the popish abbots, who from the donation of former sovereigns possess the tithes and largest revenues in the canton of Zurich. And should we seek to deprive them of their right and possession, which has now been established by long prescription, what disturbances should we occasion ! what danger should we bring upon our churches ! It seems to us also more advisable, that they should enjoy their right [of presentation] together with the tithes, and allow us peace and freedom of religion, and suffer themselves to be so far controlled by our most noble senate, as not to appoint any incumbent to the churches, who has not been brought up in our church, and approved by a lawful examination. I may add too, that there is no church in the city and canton of Zurich, which has retained the right of electing their ministers, except only that of St Peter's, of which it has pleased God that I should be the minister, and by which I was chosen thirty-one years since by the unanimous consent of the whole people, when I had not yet completed the twenty-third year of my age. And it is almost miraculous, that under the cruel tyranny of the papacy, when partly the bishop of Constance and the canons of the high church, and partly the abbess of the lower college and tho other abbots, had dominion over all the churches, and drew the tithes to themselves from every quarter, yet to this church its liberty has remained entire : in which circumstance I recognise the special care of God, by which I have more than once felt myself exceedingly strengthened. In the mean time there is no one who by this example turbulently arro- gates the like Hbcrty to himself ; nor do I, for my part, disparage the ministers of other churches, as being unlawfully appointed, because a different mode of election has been adopted in their case, which does not come so near to the practice of apostolic times. For 446 R. GU ALTER TO BISHOP COX. [lET. why should they be blamed for the iniquity of former times, and •which has brought things to such a pass that they cannot be restored without tumult and public danger? We think it better to bear with such things as may be borne consistently with godliness, and without the loss of eternal salvation, but which cannot be altered without peril and disturbance. And if your people will carefully observe this rule, they will afford less room for contention, and you will shortly, as I hope, enjoy the peace you wish for. III. When they say that no one ought to be tied down to set forms of prayer, I know not in what sense they make the assertion. If they mean this, that we are not superstitiously to attach any virtue to preconceived words of prayer, or to certain forms of praying, I am also of the same opinion ; for this rather belongs to exorcists and conjurors. But if they condemn certain forms of public prayer in the church, I should say that they are mad with their wits about them, and that, blinded with an excessive desire of innovation, they look upon every thing with envious eyes, for the purpose of finding out some occasion of calumniating. For that such prayers have been in use in all ages, no one can deny ; and it is more than necessary that they should be retained, forasmuch as most persons are either so unfitted, or even perplexed in their minds, in dangers and temptations, that they can scarce conceive their prayers in their thoughts, much less in words. And this is the reason that the Holy Ghost has caused many prayers of the servants of God to be written out and embodied in the sacred volume. And Christ himself has delivered to us a distinct form of prayer, as John the Baptist had also done before him. But yet this does not prevent individuals from offering their prayers in private for themselves, and according to the nature of their afllic- tions, nor from using such words as the Spirit may suggest : and ministers also may subjoin, at the close of their sermons, prayers suitable to the subject they have been treating of; which, however, I should wish to be done in such a way, as not to neglect and pass over such prayers as are, as it were, peculiar to, and established by long use, in particular churches. IV . No man in his senses will say that the sacraments may be administered without the word of God ; since, unless the word and element go together, there will be no sacrament, as Augustine ^ has taujrht us lono; since. And I do not think that the Lord's [1 Acccdit verbum ad clemcntuin, ct fit sacramcntum, etiam ipsum tan- quam visibile verbum. August. Tract. 80. in Job. Tom. ix. col. 445. Basil. 1541.] CLXXXVI.] R. GUALTER TO BISHOP COX. 447 supper, which is a public act of the whole church, appointed as a memorial and setting forth of the death of Christ, can be rightly administered without being preceded by a godly discourse, in which the congregation arc admonished both of the benefit derived from Christ, and also of their corresponding obligations. The case of baptism, however, is different, since by means of it even infants are received into the communion of the church, and as such, it is evident, are not yet capable of instruction, although they are com- prehended in God's covenant, and are inheritors of the kingdom of heaven. The reading of scripture then and prayers may suffice at that time, by which the sponsors may be reminded of their duty, and the grace of God obtained. Meanwhile, I by no means find fault with the practice of those churches, in which a certain day in every week is appointed for baptism, and a sermon preached, after which as many infants as have been born during that week are baptized in due order. And in our canton infants are baptized for the most part on those days on which stated sermons are preached. But as this is not suitable or convenient in all places, I would not rashly create any difficulty, whereby each church should be pre- vented the enjoyment of its own liberty without offence. V. They desire, moreover, that the father alone should answer for his child m baptism, and that no other sponsors be allowed ; in which they again betray a useless and over-busy fondness for innovation. For what religion prevents other persons at the in- vitation of the parents from undertaking this office for their infants, which in former times, when persecutions were yet raging every where, was no less necessary than useful ; and which serves at the present day to conciliate friendship, and lastly, is often of great advantage to them when they are grown up, seeing they are ad- monished and reproved with greater freedom by those who have pledged their faith for them to the church ? VI. There is no need of reviewing what they add concerning the equality of ministers, as I have above spoken upon that subject. We also ourselves condemn that primacy which is connected with ambition and a desire of domination ; but the apostle has also taught us that there is a certain order among the ministers of the church, when he says that some are appointed apostles; some, prophets ; some, pastors and teachers ; and as he makes a dis- tinction of gifts and abilities, so does he also of administrations. And I wonder that these men do not look to the construction of their own body, and the arrangement of their own members, which might instruct them how to think upon this subject, and" which 448 R. GUALTER TO RISHOP COX. [lET. similitude the apostle makes use of in this argument. Meanwhile, however, let those bear in mind, to whom a higher station is allotted, that they will only properly have pre-eminence over others, when (as Christ has taught us) they are the servants of all. VII. With respect to Confirmation, I do not suppose you approve of that theatrical display which the papists have admitted among their sacraments. But if those who are rightly instructed in the catechism, are admitted to the Lord's supper with public testimony and imposition of hands (which we know that Christ also practised in the case of young children), I do not see what occasion there is for any one to quarrel about it. VIII. Funeral sermons are not usual among us ; and since men are naturally inclined to superstitions, and those especially, which are thought to aid the salvation of the deceased, it is better either to abstain from them altogether, or so to conduct them, as that all may understand, that whatever takes place upon such occasions is done for the sake of the living who are present as hearers, and not for the sake of the departed ; of the salvation of whom, if indeed they died in the faith, and calling upon the name of God through Christ, we ought to be so certainly persuaded, that no occasion should be afforded to any one to doubt about it. From sermons of this kind, which we know to have been religiously instituted by godly fathers of old time, has arisen in later times, in the papacy, that most lucrative traffic in the fire of purgatory, masses, and the pomp of funerals ; and it is well known what is wont to take place in some reformed churches, where these prac- tices are still retained. For there are not wanting those, who, to gratify noble families, or even to obtain gifts and presents of greater value, take up almost the whole of their sermons with the commendations of the departed, which are for the most part false, or at least very doubtful, and therefore occasions of offence. But yet, if any person can preach funeral sermons, without danger of superstition, or any view to his private emolument, to the edifi- cation of the hearers, I should be loth to deprive them of such a liberty. But to speak plainly, this matter seems to me to be fraught with danger, partly on account of the propensity of the vulgar to superstition, and partly by reason of the desire of gain inherent in most people, and which I think should be called forth on the fewest possible occasions ; lest, when the ministers become greedy of gain, they render all their teaching, together with re- ligion itself, liable to suspicion. And I am influenced too by this consideration, that as God did not of old ordain anv ceremonies for CLXX.VVl.J R. GUALTER TO BISHOP COX. 449 the dead, so he kept away the priests from funerals, lest by being occupied about them they should be defiled. IX. What reading of the scriptures is in use among you, I know not. But I hear that the lessons were appointed through lack of ministers at the beginning of the reformation revived by her most serene majesty ; and we know too, that in former times all tlie books of holy scripture were read in order to the christian people. Nor do I see what inconvenience can ensue, if any persons take pleasure in readings of this kind; provided only that the office of preaching be not neglected, which it is fitting that all bishops and ministers of churches should frequently perform, that the word of God be not only read by the bye, but rightly divided, as Paul admonishes, and adapted to the instruction, consolation, and edification of all. I have thought fit to make these brief remarks upon the articles of your adversaries ; not that I imagine you have any need of my animadversions, but because, reverend father in Christ, you require my opinion upon these points. And if through ignorance any thing should have fallen from me incorrectly stated, I desire to be told of it. But I wish that all who profess the christian name Avould make for peace, and exercise themselves with united efforts for the advancement of the kingdom of God, and bear with patience one another's burdens. They would then see that they would never have so much leisure, as that, intermeddhng with things that do not belong to them, they could raise disputes about things either unnecessary, or even injurious, to the great offence of the people. For I am greatly afraid that those very persons who now treat with harshness the ministers of Christ, and cannot bear those bishops who are the patrons of purer doctrine, will find out, some time or other, that there arc wolves on both sides, who will harass them with new contests, and horribly oppress the church. For thus does God avenge the dissensions of ministers, and the dis- tractions of his church. I have not seen the book of Nicolas Saunders about monarchy ' : should I sec it, and think it deserving of an answer, I will do as the Lord shall enable me; whom I pray, reverend father in Christ, to preserve, and bless in your most godly pursuits, yourself and your colleagues, and all among you who are diUgently doing the work of Christ. Amen, Zurich, Aug. 26, 1573, Your dignity's most devoted, Rodolph Gualter, [1 Soe above, p, 418,] 29 450 R. GUALTER TO BISHOP SANDYS. [lET.' CLXXXVII. R. GUALTER TO BISHOP SANDYS. [B. 9G.] Zurich, Oct. 8, 1573. Your letter, reverend father in Christ, has been dehvered to me, and was on many accounts most gratifying to me ; both as coming from yourself, and as informing me that my lucubrations on Paul's epistles to the Corinthians were approved of by you, to whose opinion I have always paid much regard, as to that also of the others your colleagues; and as they testify that they are of the same judgment with yourself, I very little care about the opinions of others, who will, I know, be satisfied with nothing less than my approval of aU their ordinances and customs ; which indeed I wish I could approve, and would do so most willingly, if I knew them to agree in all respects with scripture. Many parties now-a-days are insisting upon, I know not what plan of church government, under the plausible name of ecclesiastical discipline ; and they tell us that no churches can exist without it. But I am greatly afraid, lest they should give birth to an aristocracy, which will shortly degenerate into an oligarchy, and be the beginning of a new papacy. For they are every where exerting themselves for the estabhshment of a simple presbytery ; into which some good and pious men are elected from the congregation at large, but in such a way, as that the power of making any law rests almost entirely with the ministers, by whose decision it becomes valid and must be ratified, although they may be beaten by a majority of votes. It was lately enacted at Heidelberg, that no one should be admitted to the [Lord''s] supper without having first presented himself to his pastor ; for St PauFs rule, that every man should examine himself, is not suflftcient for them. The elders of the church did not agree to this enactment ; which, however, notwithstanding is obtruded upon all in the name of the entire presbytery, nay, of the whole church. What, in fine, is to hinder the chief authority from devolving upon some individual, who is superior to the others in wealth or influence, and upon whose favour the rest may be dependent? And indeed an example of this new tyranny was exhibited there not long since, which ought, with good reason, to alarm all who wish well to the hborty of the church. There is a certain Swiss there, the principal of the college of St Denys, than whom, as all do testify, no one ever conducted himself there (let not this declaration be thought invidious) in a more innocent and godly manner. Nevertheless Olevianus', who is the pastor there, \} Gasper Olevianus was the son of a baker at Treves. He studied theology at Geneva, and afterwards became minister at Heidelberg, where he died hi 1587.] CLXXXVII .] . R. GUALTER TO BISHOP SANDYS. 451 denounced him in the name of all the elders, that he should not come to the Lord's supper. He added as a reason, that he could not admit him without doing violence to his feehngs. The man bore the insult with indignation, as it was natural he should do ; and desired to know Avhat crime he had committed deserving of so great a punishment. But they make no reply, farther than that they persist in their resolution. So he presents a petition to the most illustrious prince elector, that he may compel them to speak openly, and state his crime, if he has been guilty of any. But he has not been able to extort any thing from them up to this day. This now is their goodly order in those parts, this their disciphne; so that I perceive you must be on your guard in good earnest, lest new heads should break forth from the wounds of the Roman hydra yet scarcely subdued. But more upon this subject at another time. [The remainder is wanting.] CLXXXVIII. J. STURMIUS TO QUEEN ELIZABETH. [B. ST.] Strasburgh, Nov. 10, 1573. Most serene queen, and most benign mistress : Christopher Lansclade is the most illustrious individual in the whole empire of Germany, and on terms of favour and intimacy with almost all the princes, having been diUgently and actively employed for more than forty years in the councils of the counts Palatine. He is moreover a man of discretion and piety, and most favourable to and zealous for pure religion. Without any suggestion on my part, but of his o^n^ voluntary motion and affection towards your majesty, he is anxious to be one of the paid agents of your majesty. The duchess of Suffolk" is acquainted with his virtues and integrity, and especially with his hospitality and temperance and moderation. As I know him to be exceedingly well qualified for the business and service of your majesty, I do not hesitate both to recommend and praise him. By his aid and influence Ave may easily ascertain what is going on in the empire, both of a pubhc and private character ; and, moreover, gain access to all the princes. [2 This hilly was Catharhie, baroness Willoughby d'Ereshy, fourth wife of Charles Braiuloii, duke of Suffolk, and brother-in-law to king Henry VIII. She married, secondly, Richard Bertie, Esq. with whom she went into exile for religion in the time of queen Mary. See the nari'ative of their escape iu Foxe's Acts and Monuments. She died in 1580.] 29—2 452 J. STURMIUS TO QUEEN ELIZABKTH. [lET. If he did not of himself sohcit an appointment from your ma- jesty, I should nevertheless think it right to concihate and gain him over : but he does solicit it, as your majesty will understand by the letter which he has written to me upon this subject. What- ever your majesty may determine respecting this honourable and upright man, I pray God it may be happy and profitable to your majesty and to the kingdom of England. Dated at Strasburgh. Nov. 16, 1573. Your most serene majesty's constant and faithful servant and subject, John Sturmius. CLXXXIX. BISHOP COX TO R. GU ALTER. [A. 115.] Ely, Feb. 3, 1574. I RETURN you my best thanks, my dear brother in Christ, for having sent me a most courteous letter, which I received in De- cember, and in which you clearly manifest your anxiety for the church of Christ, though at so great a distance from you. This indeed ought to be the chief soUcitude of every pastor in the church, but of those more especially, who in the endowments of learning and judgment and piety are superior to the rest. When Dr Whitgift, the most vehement enemy of the schismatics, and the chief instrument against them in our church, had perceived these unruly men to have burst by their reckless attacks the barriers of law and of rehgion, which had been so well and so peacefully established ; and that they had openly distributed infamous pam- phlets ' which had been privately committed to the press ; and also that from your letter^ to our friend Parkhurst, which they had \} One book here referred to is called. An Admonition to the Parliament, by Thomas Cartwright. It had been printed and reprinted privately no less than four times, notwithstanding the diligence of the bishops to suppress it. Strype, Parker, ii. 110. See note 4, p. 434.] p The discontented brethren, m 15G5 or 1566, thought it convenient to certify the foreign churches of the transactions then against them. And for that intent they dispatched two of their party to Geneva and Helvetia ; who, when they were come to Zurich, declared unto Gualter and the other ministers there the same that they had done at Geneva, (filling his ears with grievous accusations of the bishops' dealings with the ministers.) Gualter hastily composed and sent a letter to his old friend bishop Parkhurst, who had sojourned four years at his house at Zurich ; and therein he sharply blamed him, and the rest of the hisliops, for pressing such iiiditferent things, and punishing so heavily those who complied not with them. Of this letter. CLXXXIX.] BISHOP COX TO R. GUALTER. 453 communicated to many persons, they had already obtained a handle for confirming their errors, he thought that the pubUcation of your letter to me would tend very much to the defence of the truth. Your first letter was extorted from you by those who falsely ac- cused us ; but the simple truth brought the second to light. And there is no reason why you should be disturbed about the publica- tion of what has procured credit and reputation to yourself, inas- much as it espouses the cause of truth, of which no one ought to be ashamed. I acquainted you with some of the errors of our men, in the questions I proposed to you; and you have gratified me most ex- ceedingly by the candid and sincere declaration of your sentiments: for the opinions of masters Bullinger and Gualter are of no httle weight in our church. But these disputants of ours are so shuflling and so tenacious of their own opinion, that they will give way to no one who opposes their judgment ; and they are striving to draw all your writings over to their side by a perverted interpretation of them. To give you an instance of their candour, they are zealously endeavouring to overthrow the entire order of our Anglican church. Night and day do they importune both the people and the nobiUty, and stir them up to abhorrence of those persons who, on the abolition of popery, are faithfully discharging the duties of the ministry ; and they busy themselves in everywhere weakening and diminishing their credit. And that they may eftect this with greater ease and plausibility, they bawl out to those harpies who are greedily hankering after plunder and spoil, that the property and revenues of the cathedral churches ought to be diverted to I know not what other uses. Nor will they allow bishops to take any other precedence than as individual pastors in their respective parishes, whose highest authority they wish to be that of govern- ing, together with their presbytery, the rest of the parishioners. And in this way they set up and establish the equality they speak of. Besides this, they will not acknowledge any government in the church. They propose moreover, that the estates and houses of the bishops should be appropriated to pious uses ; but, more blind than moles, they do not perceive that they will soon be swallowed up by the devouring wolves. There are in this country twenty-three bishopricks, the endowments of some of which are (for bishop Cox's reply to which see Letter CLXI.) several copies were taken, so that falling into the hands of the Puritans, they printed it with one of Beza's in the said book, called The Admonition, in justification of themselves. See Strype, Parker, n. 111.] 4f54' BISHOP cox TO R. GUALTER. [lET. little enough ; others have moderate ones, and others more abun- dant. But all are within the bounds of moderation. None of the bishops interfere in any matters but the ministry of the word and sacraments, except when the law requu'es them, or at the command of the sovereign. Nor in these things, as far as I am aware, do they deal harshly with the brethren, but temper what is severe with surprising lenity. Our opponents, however, would complain most grievously, were our jurisdiction transferred to the laity, as they call them : they would soon find out that the gold had been exchanged for brass. But how true are the insinuations which they have whispered against us in the ears of the godly, time will shoAV. And " oiu* rejoicing is the testimony of our conscience." I wish they would acquiesce in your wholesome and prudent counsel, namely, to put up with what cannot be amended without great danger. At first they attacked only things of little consequence ; but now they turn every thing, both great and small, up and down, and throw all things into confusion ; and would bring the church into very great danger, were not our most pious queen most faithful to her principles, and did she not dread and restrain the vanity and inconsistency of these frivolous men. But because we do not decline to execute the orders of the government, whenever it com- mands us to interfere, in bridling in these our tumultuous brethren, on this ground an undue severity, not to say cruelty, is most un- justly laid to our charge. But we have this one comfort, that the rehgion of Christ is ever accompanied by the cross, which he will, by his Holy Spirit, enable us wilhngly to bear. Your son, a youth of excellent promise, has only this fault, that he rarely comes to see me. But I am now obliged to excuse him, because he is residing in our other university, I mean Oxford, which is a great way off. But I hope that he will take leave of me before he goes away. You have acted prudently in so care- fully providing for your son, that like Ulysses, he may see the customs and cities of many people, and hke the industrious bee, extract piety from all the churches. May God bring him back to be a blessing to his father ! May Christ Jesus very long preserve you to us in safety ! From the Isle of Ely in England, Feb. 3, 1573, according to the English computation. Your most loving friend in Christ, Richard Cox, pastor and servant of the church at Ely, llicHARD Ely. CXC.J BISHOP PAKKHURST TO H. BULLINGER. 455 CXC. BISHOP PARKHURST TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 116.] LuDHAM, Feb. 6, 1574. ,Hail, most agreeable master Bullinger ! Your letter of the 27th of August I received on the 21st of November, at which time^ new and severe proclamations were set forth against those who cither despise our ceremonies, or refuse to observe them. May God direct it for the best, and have compassion upon all the churches of Christ ! God grant that there be not a snake in the grass ! I thank jou very much for your most learned treatise on ithe persecutions of the church, translated into Latin by our friend Simler, and which I have just now received. The German [origi- nal] never came to hand. You write mc word that you are a septuagenarian : I wish that you may at length become a centenarian, were it only for the sake of the church herself. For my own part I have almost completed my sixty-third year, namely, my cUmacteric. My wife is, according to her own account, sixty-seven years old and moi^. I rejoice that all is quiet in Switzerland. I am not sorry that the business about the hired troops turned out so unhappily. The harvest with us here in Norfolk did not begin before the feast of Bartholomew^, and was very wet and showery. There was scarce a fine day during the whole harvest, so that no small quantity of grain was lost, though the greatest portion was saved by the un- wearied diligence of the labourers. The dearth not only of wheat, but of every thing else, is very great among us. Do you ask, whence proceeds this carity ? It is because our charity is growing cold among us^. Before the feast of the Purification* we had no snow in these parts, and scarcely felt the cold. We have now plenty of both. Salute, I pray you, in my name all my friends, and JuUus himself not among the last of them. Woe betide that worst of all collectors, Thymclthorp^, who will not allow me to collect any thing \} Oct. 20, a proclamation was published against the despisers and breakers of the orders prescribed in the book of common prayer. See Strype, Parker, ii. 320.] [2 Namely, the 24th of August.] [3 This remark is borrowed from a Homily of Basil's, written on occasion of a great famine and dearth.] [■1 Namely, the 2nd of February.] [5 See note 1, p. 394. This man was imprisoned for his defalcation, and during his imprisonment obtained leave of the council to go for a while into Norfolk, where he was twice at Ludham with the bishop, and there, holding 456 BISHOP PARKIIURST TO H. BULLIXGER. [lET. for my friends ! But I hope better things. May God preserve you, and all my Zurich friends ! Amen. In haste. London, February G, 1574. My wife salutes you and yours. Farewell. Yours, John Parkhurst, [bishop] of NorAvich. CXCI. BISHOP PARKHURST TO J. SIMLER. [A. 117.] LuDHAM, Feb. 7, 1574. On the 20th of August I received your letter of the 22nd of February, 1573. That youth William Barlow, to whom you gave it, was never, as far as I am aware, known to, or seen by me. That ubiquitarian James Andreas, who threatens to write against the divines of Wittemberg^ and my Zurich friends, will lose his labour and betray his folly to every one. So far are we English from defending either the ubiquitarian or any other monstrous opinions, that we cannot endure them. We only dispute about ceremonies and habits, and things of no importance. that these skirmishes and colitentions may at length be laid to rest and buried in obhvion ! The papists are certainly cherishing, I know not what expectations; but I hope without reason. May the Lord grant an end {finem) to these things, and a halter (funem) to the papists ! I hope our friend Magdalen has many months since recovered from the ague. May the Lord release from the gout both you and my wife ! Amen. Ludham, February 7, 1574. Salute your wife and all my friends. My wife salutes you all. Yours, John Parkhurst, [bishop] of Norwich. up his hands and falling on his knees, beseeched him that he would pardon him the injury. To whom the bishop chvistianly answered, that he would loardon the injury done him, but the payment of money due to him and the queen he could not pardon. Strype, Annals, ii. i. 336.] [1 Among whom was Peucer, son-iu-law to Melancthon, and head of the university of Wittemberg. He aimed at nothing less than abolishing the doctrine of Luther concorning the cucharist and the person of Christ, with a design to substitute the sentiments of Calvin in its place. For these prin- ciples he was irapi'isoned from 1574, after the convocation of Thorgau, till 15S5. See Mosheim, and also Casparis Feuceri Historia carcerum et libera- tionis divinee. By Christopher Fezelius, Tigm-i, 1605.] CXCII.] H. BULLINGER TO BISHOP SANDYS, 457 CXCII. H. BULLINGER TO BISHOP SANDYS. [B. 98.] Zurich, March 10, 1574. Health. I return you, my honoured master and very dear brother, the warmest thanks in my power for that letter^ of yours, written at London on the 15th of August last year, and abounding in all kindness, and love, and especial regard to me. Nor have you any reason to doubt of equal love and affection to- wards you on my part. Let us continue so to love each other in the Lord, as it is certain that brotherly love, and the especial union of brethren, is particularly pleasing to God ; and that no- thing is more useful, or necessary to his church. For we per- ceive at this present day that nothing occasions greater disturbance in the churches of God than the discord of those who teach. For at this very time the separation of some morose, haughty, and obstinate Lutherans, by which, having torn themselves from us, they are maintaining and endeavouring to obtrude upon every one else some of their own superficial opinions, makes many of the churches in Germany not to know what they are following after ; and in the mean time the course of the gospel is impeded in many quarters, and dissensions are fomented and increased, while our common enemies in the mean time are laughing in their sleeves. I wish we may not be compelled to see some time or other these odious contests draw along with them many parties to destruction ! Where- fore it grieves me in no common degree to learn from your letter that contentions of this kind are also prevalent in England. These things are doubtless owing to the wiles of Satan, who, when he perceives that he is unable to destroy the churches by threaten- ings, violence, and persecutions, from without, has recourse to other artifices, and meditates the overthrow of the church by domestic broils and the mutual attacks of brethren upon each other. May the Lord beat down Satan under the feet of the saints, and compose these destructive contests with holy harmony and peace ! The young orators, however, whom you describe to me, as busying themselves in changing the Avhole face of your church, and putting on it a new shape, with the confiscation too of all ecclesias- tical property, seem to me to imitate those seditious Roman tribunes, who gave away the pubHc possessions by the Agrarian^ laws, that they might obtain wealth and honour to themselves as individuals ; that is, that when we are turned out, they may come into our place, [2 Sec above, Lcttpr CLXXXV. p. 438.] [•'5 See Cicero's three orations atrainst Riillus.] 458 H. BULLINGER TO BISHOP SANDYS, [lET. &c. But these parties are endeavouring to erect a church, which they will never raise to the height they wish ; nor if they should erect it, will they be able to maintain it. I have seen the heads of their fabric as dchneated by you, with respect to which I have long since declared my sentiments. The first proposition, that the civil magistrate has no authority in ecclesiastical matters ; and also the second, that the church admits of no other government than that of presbyters, or the presbytery ; these two, I say, they hold in common Avith the papists, who also displace the magistrate from the government of the church, and substitute themselves alone in his place. Whose opinion I have confuted in my refutation of the pope's bull, and in my defence of the queen of England and her noble realm, &c., which I sent you tAvo years since. I wish that there were no lust of dominion in the originators of this presby- tery! Nay, I think the greatest caution is necessary that the supreme power be not placed in this presbytery, much more that it be not an exclusive government. Perhaps this presbytery may be admitted in one or two churches, but not in all; upon which much might be said. But time will bring to hght many things that now are hidden. Of the names and authority of bishops, and also of the election of ministers, our friend Gualter' has fully written to the reverend lord bishop of Ely, master Cox. You may, if you choose, ask him for the letter. The abuse of ecclesiastical property I think should be removed, lest it should be made subservient to idolatry and superstition. But the use of it may be good, if it be applied to schools, the ministry, the edifices of the church, and the support of the poor. Upon this subject I have treated in my Decades, near the end of the work^ The church cannot possibly exist without means; and if they are not at hand, they must certainly be collected from the faithful. What madness is it then, to throw away what is al- ready provided, or to yield it up to others who have no claim upon it, and collect entirely new revenues, to the great inconvenience of the faithful ! I cannot see what these men are driving at. I fear they have some other object than the ostensible one, &c. And if no one is allowed to preach in any congregation but the minister alone, what is to be done if he should be taken ill, or by reason of other engagements should be unable to preach ? Must the church • [1 See above, Letter CLXXXVI. p. 440 .] [2 « Fifty Godly and Licensed Sermons." Loud. 1577. Dec. v. Scrm. 10. foil. 1118, &c.] CXCII.] H. BULUNGER TO BISHOP SANDYS. 45^ in the mean time be without its assembUes ? I know that Chryso- stom sharply reproved Epiphanius for usurping to himself authority in another man's church ; but that was a different matter altogether. With us the gospel would not have been so widely propagated, if ministers had confined themselves to preaching only in their own churches. I also am unwilling that the infants of papists should be bap- tized against the wishes of their parents. But those who reject them when presented to the church, seem to resemble the apostles, who forbade httle children to be brought to the Lord Christ ; for which he severely rebuked them. Concerning the judicial laws of Moses I have treated in my third Decade, the seventh and eighth discourse. These men indeed seem to be inordinately desirous of novelty. I wish they would look beyond their own partialities. May the Lord grant them the spirit of peace and quietness ! No cloth has been brought hither. Our friend Froschover in- deed mentioned that he had heard something about some cloth, but that none had been given to him ; nor has any been sent hither by any body. Nevertheless I most exceedingly thank your kindness for tliis your generous beneficence. It has possibly loitered somewhere on the road. But I must request you not to put your- self to any expense on my account in future. I have seen a letter written by these innovators, in which it is said that the bishops send presents to learned men, to draw them over to their side. Presently too they would say that we are Balaams. I know indeed that good men may accept from their friends honorary and friendly presents; but you know what moved Paul not to receive the wages that were due to him. " All things," he said, " are lawful, but all things are not expedient." I had rather that men who arc so ready to speak evil and calumniate, should not have the least occasion of detracting from me and my ministry. Take, I pray you, these my sentiments, such as they are, in good part, and continue to love me in return who have such affection for yourself, ]\Iay the Lord bless you, and preserve you from all evil ! Zurich, JMarch 10, 1574. Be pleased to salute, I pray you, in my name the reverend master Horn, bishop of Winchester, and wish on my behalf every happiness to him and his wife, and make my excuse for not having written at this time a separate letter to himself. I will write at another time when I have more leisure. Your reverence's most devoted, H. Bullinger. 460 H. BULLINGER TO ARCHBISHOP GRINDAL. [lET. CXCIII. H. BULLINGER TO ARCHBISHOP GRINDAL. [B. 99.] Zurich, March 10, 1574. Greeting. Reverend and right worshipful master, I received in the month of October your letter ^ dated on the last day of July in the past year. But in proportion as it gratified me, from having been so long and so anxiously expected, the more grievously it distressed me, as I understood by it that the contests among you had been revived by certain disorderly young men, who are endea- vouring to do away with the whole ecclesiastical system, arranged with so much labour by most excellent men, and to introduce a new one formed after their own pleasure. Idlers of this stamp are to be met with all over the world, Avho, notwithstanding they are unable to carry their plans into effect, yet in the mean time by these their endeavours disturb and harass many good men, are a stumbling-block to the more simple, excite the hopes of the papists, and grievously impede the progress of the gospel. The reverend bishop^ of Ely complained to our friend Gualter upon this very subject last year, as did also the reverend bishop^ of London to myself. He thereupon made answer to some enquiries of his, as I also have now* made some few remarks in reply to those of the bishop of London. We are plagued also throughout all Germany by characters of this kind. Nor can I suggest any more wholesome advice in this matter, than that we should turn to the Lord, and earnestly pray him graciously to confound these disorderly tempers, so ready for innovations, and to preserve the churches in peace. I would advise, in the next place, that they be brought back into the right way by friendly conferences or colloquies; and that those who from arrogance and obstinacy will not endure to retrace their steps, may be so depicted in their true colours, as that they may acquire less influence with right-minded persons, and so be rendered less mischievous. But there is no need for me to instruct you upon this subject, as you have long since learned by constant experience, and the hitherto prosperous government of the chm"ches, what ought to be done in this case, or left undone. There are persons in Germany who pride themselves upon being Lutherans, but who are in reality most shameless brawlers, railers, and calumniators. They never cease to attack our churches, [1 See above. Letter CLXXXII. p. 434.] [2 See above. Letter CLXXIIL p. 416.] [3 See above, Letter CLXXXV. p. 438.] [■* See the preceding Letter.] CXCIII.] H. BULLINGEII TO ARCHBISHOP GRINDAL. 461 ourselves, and our doctrine respecting the Lord's supper \ which they invidiously disparage among themselves by the name of Zuinglianism. And they have lately sent forth afresh against us and our friends at Heidelberg books, wliich if we should omit to notice, we should appear betrayers both of sound doctrine and our holy churches. My beloved son-in-law, therefore, master Josiah Simler, professor of theology in our college, divided with myself the labour or trouble of writing an answer ; so that he was to reply in Latin and somewhat more at length to the arguments of our opponents, while I wrote in German briefly, and in a popular style, suited to the apprehension of the ordinary reader. I send you copies of each book, and request you to receive them with kindness froin your most loving friend, and to read them at your leisure. You are aware that Brentius'' (with whom, while he lived, I had a long and tedious dispute, as our published books bear witness), from his zeal and anxiety for strife and conquest, intermixed with the con- troversy respecting the [Lord's] supper many articles of faith, about which his scholars still continue to dispute, and obscure them, and to raise doubts concerning the greater portion of them ; as for instance, the doctrine respecting one person and two natures in Christ, the omnipotence and omnipresence (as they say) of the humanity of Christ, his ascension to the heavens, and [his pre- sence] in heaven, &c. We were obliged therefore to reply to those heads : but it will be the part of yourself and other godly men to form a judgment upon these our answers. I pray God that we may have treated upon these points to the great benefit of the church. We replied principally to tilings, not persons, abstain- ing from reproachful language, lest we should be made like unto them. In all other respects, by the blessing of God, every thing is quiet in our churches. Our adversaries perceive that the better part of the people are every where joining themselves to our doc- trine (which is Christ's), and to the church ; they are therefore raging, &c. May the Lord restrain them ! Besides, we are con- [5 For a statement of the respective opinions of Luther and Zuinglius upon this subject, see Coverdcile's translation of Calvin's treatise on the Sacrament, Parker Soc. Ed. p. 463.] [6 In 1561, Bullinger published a book, wherein he shewed that Jesus Christ, as to his human nature, is no where but in heaven, at the right hand of God. This Avas answered by Brent ius, the advocate of the Ubiquitarian doctrine; and this contest lasted two years. In 1571, Bullinger wrote against the testament of Brentius, which he published at Wittemberg to foi-ewarn all states not to allow the Zuinglians a toleration. See above, Letter CLIII. p. 350, n. 2.] 462 H. BULLINGER TO ARCHBISHOP GRINDAL. [lET; tinually harassed, at the instigation of the pope, by our alUes and neighbours who adhere to him ; for he is greatly annoyed that the doctrine of Christ is preached in the neighbourhood of Italy, and is making greater progress than he wishes. He is therefore trying to set us at war with each other. May the Lord preserve us from evil ! Persons who have come from Italy say, that the Venetians are uncertain as to the peace made with the emperor of Turkey, and that they have therefore sent a naval force to Crete, and ships are being refitted, and troops levied. Meanwhile they have an ambassador with the Turk, whose last tidings were that he did not altogether despair ; but that it would be useful for the Venetian republic, if they regard their own interest, to take care that they may not be attacked unprepared, in case the expectation of peace should come to nothing. It is moreover certain that no sovereign of Turkey was ever better prepared both by land and sea than this Sehm ^ ; and it is certain that at this season of spring he will bring forth all his forces against Spain and her allies. The Maltese therefore are crowding in haste to Melita or Malta from all parts of Germany. They are arming too in Apulia, Calabria, and Sicily, &c. What will be the event, the Lord knows, whom I heartily pray to have compassion upon us. There is also being levied an army both of cavalry and infantry in Germany, below Mayence and above Cologne, wliich it is said will be marched into Lorraine, though some think into Flanders, and others say into France, under the command of Christopher Count Palatine and Lewis of Nassau. But this is at present uncertain. The duke of Anjou^ has passed through Germany into Poland, The murder of the lord admiral and of the Huguenots was cast in [1 Selim II.] [2 The duke of Anjou, afterwards Henry III., quitted France in Novem- ber, 1573, on his election to the throne of Poland. Dui'ing the journey he stopped at Heidelberg, where the elector Palatine omitted nothing which could remind him of the massacre of St Bartholomew. In his pictm'e gallery he shewed him a portrait of Coligny, and pointing to it said, " You know this man ; you have killed in him the greatest captain in all Christen- dom. And you ought not to have done so, for he has done the king and yom'self great seiTices." Henry attempted an excuse upon the ground of the conspiracy, to which the elector answered, " We know the whole history of that," and quitted the I'oom. This was not the only mortification of the kind which Henry experienced on his journey. See Smedle/s Hist, of Ref. in France, ii. 91 ; Browning, Hist, of Huguenots, 104, and the authorities there (juoted.] CXCIII.] H. BULLINGER TO ARCHBISHOP GRINDAL. 463 his teeth throughout the whole journey. He was magnificentl}'' received by the Poles. We have no farther intelhgence on this subject. And a rumour is now prevalent, that the king of France is about to ask for two regiments from his Swiss allies. But I can say nothing certain on this matter. I entreat your excellency to communicate these things, if you please, to master Pilkington, bishop of Durham, and make my excuse for not having written a separate letter to himself. I desire that he may be safe and well in the Lord. Certainly, were I not aware of the great intimacy that exists between you, I should have sent him a letter, notwith- standing my numerous and overwhelming engagements. He will have also, in addition to this, a copy of Josiah Simler's reply " on the presence," &c. For I have ordered my friend Froschover to send you two copies, that you might present one to the bishop of Durham. The German copy I have sent only to yourself, and not to him, because I know that he is not able to read German. At the end^ of your letter you make mention of sending me a remembrance. But I must request you not to put yourself to any expense on my account. Any kindness that I have heretofore conferred, or do confer upon you, is entirely voluntary on my part, and not for the sake of any return. Meanwhile any remembrances of our brethren and friends are not without their gratification, as testimonies of mutual friendship, just as I have hitherto laid before you my OAvn labours, in testimony that I am yours, and that I desire to serve and oblige you by every means in my power, and that I love you sincerely. Your friendship in return is quite suffi- cient for me, if you will also sometimes write to me when you have leisure, as you are wont to do. I know too that friends are fond of contending with each other in sending presents, and that gifts of this kind may be received by good men without impropriety : but I have seen a letter of yoiu* innovators, in which they state that the English bishops send presents to learned men, to draw them back to their party. These men forsooth (such is their virulence) would be able to throw disgrace both upon us and our ministry. So that I say with the apostle, " All things are lawful for me, but all things are not expedient.'"' He might himself have accepted a return for his labours, but would not accept it by reason of his adversaries. Nevertheless I return you the warmest thanks in my power for that your beneficence ; and I thank your kindness also for the verses you sent mc upon the deliverance of Scotland from civil war by the means of the most serene queen of England. I [3 See above, Letter CLXXXII. p. 430.] 464 H. BULLINGER TO ARCHBISHOP GKINDAL. [lET. was much pleased with them. I pray the Lord to strengthen and preserve the queen. May he hkewise bless you and all yours, and preserve you from evil! Zurich, March 10, 1574. I commend to you our friend Julius. Yom* reverence's most devoted, Henry Bullinger. CXCIV. R. GUALTER TO BISHOP COX. [B. 100.] Zurich, March 16. 1574. The letter^ you wrote to mc on the 12th of June, reverend father in Christ, I received only at the beginning of October by our townsmen, on their return from the Frankfort fair. And I perceive that you were then anxious about the former letter'^, which you had sent at the beginning of spring, together with some articles maintained by your opponents. But I hope you are now reheved from all that anxiety by a letter^ of mine written in the month of August, and wherein I declared my judgment respecting those articles, according to the grace given me by the Lord. I should wonder at the unreasonableness of those men, did I not know that it is the condition of the church, either to have open enemies, who endeavour by violence and open warfare to over- throw the doctrine of truth ; or to be assailed by the treachery of false brethren ; or to be harassed with superfluous or unprofitable questions by those who, though they may entertain right notions as to the chief points of doctrine, stir up unnecessary disturbances about external rites and ceremonies. You have long ago endured the violence of most cruel enemies, who have endeavoured to satiate their rage among you with the innocent blood of numerous martyrs'*; and the arts also of false brethren were detected at the same time : and since, by the blessing of God, you have overcome all these things with admirable courage and constancy of mind, I hope that in this also God will have pity upon your England ; so that you may be able at length to enjoy the wished for peace, and to apply your endeavours with unanimous consent to the edifying of the church ; Avhich it appears to me absolutely necessary that we should [1 See above, Letter CLXXV. p. 420.] [2 Sec above, Letter CLXXIIL p. 416.] [3 See above, Letter CLXXXVI. p. 440.] [* It is calculated that two hundred and eighty-eight persons were burned for religion in queen Mary's reign, besides those that died of famine and sickness in sundry prisons. See Stry]'ie, Mem. in. ii. 554.] CXCIV.] U. GUALTEK TO BISHOP COX. 465 all diligently aim at, whom the Lord has chosen to be ministers of his church. For it is sufficiently evident that the Roman anti- christ is employing all his power and exertions towards this object, namely, that the carrying into effect the council of Trent may at length produce its intended result. Your neighbours make no secret of this ; and though they are restrained by ancient treaties with our nation, and the terms of a general peace, in which pro- vision is made that no one shall give any trouble to another on account of diversity of religion, yet they, are making many attempts, by which it plainly appears that they are seeking an occasion of disturbance. From the kings of Spain and France nothing of a pacific character can be expected ; since the latter is neither moved by the ruin of his country, nor by so many horrible slaughters of the most excellent persons, to establish a firm peace among his subjects ; while the former would rather see that most flourishino; and hereto- fore most productive province of Belgium utterly destroyed by intestine war, than give admission there to Christ and his gospel. The bishops of Germany too, strengthened by I know not what promises, are not a little furious; and those among the popish princes, who have hitherto been acting with some degree of moder- ation, are now themselves beginning to foam with hostility, and to punish with severity the worshippers of Christ who are dispersed throughout their territories. And it has happened most agreeably to the wishes of them all, that the brother^ of the king of France, who has been from his childhood accustomed to the blood of the saints, has been raised to the throne of Poland. Nor do I think that the Roman pontiff would have supported his cause so actively, had he not wi.shed to make use of his assistance in oppressing the churches of the neighbouring nation of Germany, to the end that they may more easily be overpowered in other places also. And when such dangers are talked about so generally, it is fitting that we should be roused by them, and with united energies take up the cause of Christ ; and not give encouragement to those pro- moters of disorder, whom either ambitious emulation or even ignorance has so beguiled, that they are unable to see what makes for the preservation of our common church. They wish to revive, as you tell me, that ancient presbytery which existed in the primi- [5 Henry, duke of Anjou, afterwards Ilcni-y III. of France, defeated tlio Iluguenots in the battles of Jarnac and Montcontour, in 15G9; and coiii- inandcd at the siege of Rochelle, when the news arrived of his election to the crown of Poland in 1573. Sec above, p. 432, n. 1.] 80 466 R. GUALTER TO BISHOP COX. [lET. tive church : but I wish they would think about reviving that simphcity of faith and purity of morals, which formerly flourished, and not attack the commonwealth, the ancient rights and constitu- tion of which Christ does not change ! The church of old had need of a government of its own, when it was subject to heathen sovereigns, who not only made light of, but even persecuted the christian religion, and the moral disciphne connected with it. But what is that to those, to whom God (as he promised by Isaiah) has given kings for nursing fathers, and queens for nursing mothers ; who, in fine, have magistrates well affected towards religion, who are enabled to establish and maintain moral disciphne with far greater authority, and consequently more abundant benefit, than if they appointed ten presbyteries in every church ? But sovereigns, say they, do not always do their duty. I admit it ; but is it lawful for them on this account to appoint a new magistracy ? Saul did not do his duty ; but Samuel did not therefore appoint a new senate, nay, nor even David, who, notwithstanding he knew that he was anointed king by God, yet would not make any alteration in the commonwealth, but waited for the time when it pleased God to remove the tyrant, and change the form of the government. The same thing may be said of all the prophets, whom we do not read ever to have attempted any thing of this kind under wicked, or at least most negligent, sovereigns. I greatly fear there is lying concealed under the presbytery an affectation of ohgarchy, which may at length degenerate into monarchy, or even into open tyranny. Nor do I fear this without reason. For I know (to give one instance out of many) a city ^ of some importance, in which, after this form of discipline had been introduced, within the space of three years were exhibited such instances of tyranny as would put the Romanists to shame. For last year they warned a most excellent man, and one of approved piety, by the public minister of their presbytery, not to present liimself at the Lord's supper, because they could not admit him without grievous offence. Surprised at this unexpected edict, he came before these Ai'eopagites, and asked them what he had been guilty of? Then they began to shrink back, and cause delays, and to weave one excuse after another. But he, conscious of his innocence, presented a petition to the chief magistrate of the place, praying liim to compel them by his authority to bring the matter to a trial. But not even the prince could obtain this from these great maintainers of ecclesiastical discipline. And when at length [1 Heidelberg. See Letter CLXXXVII. p. 450.] CXCIV.] R. GUALTER TO BISHOP COX. 46/ they were pressed on all sides, they had recourse to falsehood, and persuaded the prince that the party had abstained of his own ac- cord from coming to the Lord's supper, and that he now wanted to extort from them the reasons of his voluntary staying away. Many other things of this kind have taken place, which it would be tedious to relate. But if they afford such samples, when they have not yet come into full possession of this new kingdom, what must we expect them to do, if they acquire an absolute dominion ? Zuinglius, the apostle of our nation, perceived these things long ago ; and when QEcolampadius with a good and holy zeal was desirous of bringing back into the church the power of excommuni- cation, he warmly opposed it. But when CEcolampadius would not hsten to his advice, and had obtained at Basle what he wished, he was compelled, not long after, to relinquish the scheme he had scarcely begun; and learned by the result that he had been attempting a work of more trouble than profit. I cannot therefore blame those, who oppose themselves to the designs of those parties who are now-a-days agitating this subject with so much asperity. But that they may not have any plausible ground of calumniating, it will be necessary to establish by the authority of the chief magis- trate a truly christian moral discipline, by which may be restrained both the ministers of churches, should they live disorderly, and the too great licentiousness of the nobUity and the corrupt morals of the people. For should this be effected, they will have no cause of complaint, unless they mean avowedly to aspire to the sovereign authority. As to myself, it was indeed very annoying to me to be dragged upon the stage before those whom I had always loved and rever- enced as my intimate friends and honom^ed masters. But as I hear that this liberty of publishing any thing at their pleasure has been restrained by her most serene majesty's proclamation^, the temerity of these men does not much trouble me. Yet I jjerccive that more grievous contests will arise for me in other quarters, unless God shall remove this stumbling-block. For there are parties both in Germany and in a certain other place, who maintain that, unless that form of discipline which they have framed themselves be every where received, the kingdom of Christ cannot possibly hold together. I refrain myself hitherto, lest I should be said to have begun the contest. But if they sound an attack, I cannot but [2 The queen issued out a proclamation against the Admonition to Par- liament, and all other books made for the defence of it or agreeable there- with, on June 11, 1573. Strype, Parker, ir. 257.] 30— g 468 K. GUALTEK TO lUSHOP COX. [lET. stand forth for the ti'uth of doctrine and the liberty of the churches ; and I hope that there will not be wanting those who will defend this cause together with myself. Thus, reverend father in Chi-ist, have I thought fit to reply to your eminence, and request you will take all in good part. I de- sired my son^ by letter in October, either to visit you more frequently, or to address you by letter. But I know not whether he is still in England, or whether he has crossed over into Denmark this spring, as I ordered him to do at the autumn fair. If he is still loitering in England, I know that he will be received with kindness both by yourself and my other friends and ever honoured masters. I wish him, however, to return home to me before next winter, unless some situation fall in his way to detain him ; upon which subject I have written to my old friend master Parkhurst, the bishop of Norwich. But I had forgotten to state that the Ubiquitarian diviues are grown more furious than ever, and are even surpassing themselves in unbridled abuse and lust of slander. For, not contented with what Luther long since wrote rather in tem- perately against our teachers, they now exclaim that we are all Arians, and worse than Mahomet. I know what spirit actuates them, but I will not now say what is their final object. God grant that I may be mistaken in my opinion ! I pray him heartily, reverend father, to preserve you, and bless both your labours and those of your colleagues. Amen. Zurich, March 16, in the year of Christ's birth, 1574. Your eminence's most devoted, RODOLPH GUALTER. CXCV. BISHOP PARKHURST TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 118.] LuDHAM, June 29, 1574. May you be safe in Christ, my very dear Bullinger ! In my former letter, which I sent you on the 6th of February, I expressed my warmest thanks for that very learned little treatise which you sent me respecting the persecutions of the church ; and I now repeat them. The Latin edition I have received ; that in German I have not yet seen. Your letter of March 10th came to hand on the 26th of June, in which you state that you have now forwarded to me a certain reply to the Brentian party, and also two homilies on the 130th and 13ord Psalms. Neither of these \} Bishop Cox had complained to Gualtcr of the infrequency of his son's visits. See above, Letter CLXXV. p. 421.] CXOV.] BISHOP PARKHURST TO H. BULLINGER. 469 have I received. Woe betide those persons by whom so great a treasure has been taken from me ! A certain young Dutch ^ woman about seventeen or eighteen years of age, a servant of the preacher of the church at Norwich, was during a whole year miserably vexed by Satan. In all her temptations, however, and dilacerations, she continued stedfast in the faith, and withstood the adversary with more than manly forti- tude. At last, by God's help, the devil being overcome left her, and almost at the same instant attacked the son of a certain senator, whom he also tormented in a most incredible manner for some weeks together. Public prayers were offered in the city by my direction, and a fast proclaimed until evening. The Lord had mercy also on the boy, and overcame the enemy. The boy was thirteen or at most fourteen years old, and, for his age, well versed in the scriptures, which, stedfast in faith, he boldly launched forth against the enemy. The Lord liveth, by whom this boy and girl, of a weak constitution in other respects, were enabled to overcome so great and terrible an adversary. To God be the praise ! That confession of true religion wliich you pubhshed in 1566, is now read in English, and in the hands of every one. The scarcity of all things still continues among us. Rodolph, the son of our friend Gualter, is coming back to you : he is a youth well learned, of good talents, and pious conduct. His father is dis- pleased with him for not hving more economically^. If he has acted improperly in this respect, we must make allowance for his youth. Do you earnestly entreat his father not to receive his re- turning son less favourably than that excellent parent in Luke xv. Salute, I pray you, 'in my name all my friends, your sons and daughters, Dorothy especially, whom I wish it would please God to unite in marriage to my friend Rodolph. Indeed I earnestly desire this, and should rejoice most exceedingly were it to take place with your consent, and that of my friend Gualter ; and you also, as I hope, will rejoice, and the Lord will bless their union. Farewell, my Bullinger, and continue to love me. My wife salutes you all. In haste. Ludham, June 29, 1574. Yours, John Parkhurst, N[orwich.] [2 See Strype, Annals, ii. i. 484, and Soames's Elizabethan Histoiy, p. 203, where are related other stories of the same kind.] [3 He was somewhat a prodigal youth. Strype, Annals, ii. i. 608.] 470 BISHOP PARKHURST TO J. SIMLER. [lET. CXCVI. BISHOP PARKHURST TO J. SIMLER. [A. 119.] LuDHAM, June 30, 1574. Hail, my Simler. You have no occasion to thank me so heartily on accomit of our friend Rodolph^ He is one upon whom far greater benefits might worthHv be bestowed. Beino- summoned by his father in a letter sent to me, and persuaded by your advice, he is now hastening home. I had intended to have kept him longer in England, and supported him at the University of Oxford, and that without any expense to his father ; but since it is your wish, he shall depart, not only without any opposition on my part, but with my entire consent. I will advance his interests even in his absence. It is a marvellous occurrence that a cow should have brought forth a fawn ! But the wonder is diminished, when the circum- stance took place in the neighbourhood of these portentous monks. I have neither received your little book against the Brentians, nor the BibHotheca [of Conrad Gessner] enlarged by you". Fros- chover has probably forgotten it ; but, however it be, I thank you for your kindness. I wish you would look out for a wife for Rodolph. If you are inchned to take my advice, Dorothea, Bul- llnger's daughter, shall be the person : for she is pious, and, like our friend, the offspring of pious parents : so that you will do well if they should, by your means, be joined together in holy ma- trimony. Fare thee well, my dearest Josiah. Greet in my name our friends Magdalen, Anna, Nobilitatula, together with their husbands. Heartily salute Haller, Lavater, Wonhchius, Wickius, Julius, Fros- chover, John Henry Fabricius, Michaclis, (if he is yet alive ;) the [1 Viz. Gualter's son, whom, the bishop had maintained first at Cambridge, and then at Oxford, and in other places, while he was in England, at his sole expense, though he were somewhat a prodigal youth ; and gave him a viaticum, to bear his charges when he returned home. Strype, Annals ii. i. 508.] [2 Josiah Simler published at Ziu'ich, in 1574, an abridgement of the Bibliotheca, or Universal Dictionary of Conrad Gessner. Conrad Lycos- thenes [Wolfhart], minister at Basle, had previously undertaken a compen- dium of this great work ; but the abridgement of Simler was a much more able pei-formance, wherein he not only avoided the defects of Wolfhart, but enriched the Avork with many valuable additions, which he marked with an asterisk to distinguish them from the original work. Frisius published a second edition of Simler's abridgement in 1583.] CXCVr.] BISHOP PARKHURST TO J. SIMLER. 471 Meyers, Cellarii, Thaddeus Betta, and all the rest. My wife salutes you all. Again farewell. In haste. Ludham, June 30, 1574. Yours, John Parkhurst, N. CXCVII. A. CORRANUS=* TO H. BULLINGER. [B. 101.] liONDON, July 7, 1574. I AM one of those, most learned sir, who by the aid of your Avritmgs have acquired a purer knowledge of christian doctrine. For there befel mo some twenty years ago, by the providence of God, a suitable opportunity of studying your books, supplied too by the Spanish inquisitors themselves ; whence as I perceive myself to have derived abundant fruit, I am compelled by the duty of gratitude to thank you, since I cannot return the obligation. The son of Eodolph Gualter, who is the bearer of this letter, will explain to you in person what countryman I am, and where I reside. I have also given him a little treatise * which I was desirous at this time to publish ; but so many errors have crept in through the carelessness of the printer, who is unacquainted with Latin, (as are almost all the printers in this country,) that I am quite ashamed to obtrude upon men of learning this lucubration, too barren in itself, so carelessly printed. But as it is not my intention in this writing to boast of the learning that is in me, (for it is Httle or nothing,) but to shew to the evangelical churches my sentiments respecting the christian religion, to repel the calumnies of certain parties^; I could wish on this account that some other printer [3 Antony Corranus was a native of Seville, who had fled Irom his own country for the profession of true religion, and became preacher to a French congregation at Antwerp, which ho left in 1568, on being appointed preacher to the Spanish congregation in London. At this time, in 1574, he was divinity reader at the Temple. He afterwards read divinity at Oxford, was censor theologiGus in Christ Church, and obtained a prebend in St Paul's. He died in 1591. Strype, Parker, i. 539. ir. 402. Grindal, 185. Remains of Abj). Grindal, Parker Soc. Ed. pp. 309—313.] [' Corranus had written certain tables concerning the works of God, wherein he endeavoured to comprehend, as it were in propositions, the holy doctrine of both tho Testaments. This work was charged with Pe'agianism, for which therefore ho met with much trouble, and was fain afterwards to write articles of his faith, printed by Tho. Pm-foot in 1574.] [5 The trouble ex]x>rienced by Corranus both from the ministers and elders of the strangers' church in London, and also from Mr Alvey, Hooker's predecessor in the mastership of the Temple, arose from his varying from 472 A. CORRANUS TO H. BULLINGER, [lET. would put this dialogue' to press, and that three hundred copies at most, which have been most shamefully struck off here, should be suppressed. The articles of religion, which I have placed at the end of the book, are taken from your confession, to confute the malignity of those parties Avho, from the personal hatred which they bear to- wards me, have most impudently condemned these same articles, written out by me, and brought forward in proof of my innocence, as thinking they were my own production. You will see an instance of this malignity in a certain page printed here both in Latin and English, with the criticisms of some Aristarchus or other ; so that, as they say, you may know the lion by his claws. The younger Gualter will himself give you the page, and relate many other instances of the preposterous way in which certain parties have acted towards me. Meanwhile, I pray you, most vigilant pastor, to reckon me in the number of those whom by your labours and watchings you have brought to the knowledge of Christ ; and should there be any thing in this little book which you disapprove of, correct it at your pleasure and with your well known prudence, and when corrected, order it to be printed. If you will do this, you will yet more exceedingly bind me and my services to you for evermore. Farewell. London, July 7, 1574. Your most loving and respectful, Antony Corranus. CXCVIII. BISHOP COX TO R. GUALTER. [A. 120.] Ely, July 12, 1574. Your letter, written March 16th, 1574, my very dear brother in Christ, I received in the June following : it was indeed most gratifying to me, both as proceeding from so dear a friend, and as warning us that all the enemies of the truth are now every where plotting together, and preparing for the destruction of all who pro- fess the religion of Christ. It is indeed very important that all godly persons should know this, that they may arm themselves in time with the whole armour of God. And though we may for the present seem to be safe, we see nevertheless the dangerous machi- nations of the papists surrounding us on every side. Nay more, Calvin and Beza in the doctrine of predestination and free-will. Strype, Parker, n. 402.] [1 In 1573, Corranus read upon the epistle to the Romans, and in 1574, contracted his lectures into a theological dialogue, and then printed them. Strype, ut supra.] CXCVIII.] BISHOP COX TO R. GUAI.TER. 473 even from ourselves, from time to time, venomous serpents come forth, as from their dens, brandishing their poisonous stings, which by the grace of God we have hitherto escaped. But when I reflect upon the wickedness which every where overflows, and upon not only the neglect but the contempt of the word of God, I am struck with horror, and thiuk with trembling what God is about to decree concerning us. If the psalm, The fool hath said in his heart, S^c, or that, Let God arise, and let his enemies be scattered, (Sfc, was ever applicable, it is at this time. You rightly judge, most learned Gualter, concerning the pres- byterian system of our people, and the sounder portion of the clergy of the church of England agree with you ; and these noisy disturbers now give us scarcely any trouble, except that they con- tinue to carp at our rites, like ghosts in the dark : they have for some time past been restrained by a rather severe correction, and are now vanquished by a most learned confutation^. When we have so many sanguinary enemies on all sides, (besides the Turks,) namely the papists, it is indeed to be lamented that so many dissensions exist in the reformed churches, as that they seem to be destroying themselves with their own weapons. May the Lord Jesus Christ, our only physician, at length afi^ord a remedy for these evils ! I doubt not but that the force of truth is so powerful in yourself, that should she want an advocate either with us or with you, or indeed in any place whatever, you will shew yourself a soldier of Christ. We retain in some measure the moral disci- pline of which you make mention in your letter ; but should any one seek to compel our great men to submit their necks to it, it would be much the same as shaving a lion's beard. The absurdities of the ubiquitarians have been long since most learnedly and courageously repressed by Peter Martyr, and very lately by your countryman Josiah Simler. But he that shall come, ivill come, and will not tarry, [Heb. x. 37,] who shall bruise with his hammer and break in pieces all those who are obstinate. Your son, a youth of excellent disposition, courteously took leave of me upon his quitting this country. I pray God that he may return to you in safety, and that as an aged parent you may have the enjoyment of a pious son. Farewell. From the Isle of Ely in England. July 12, 1574. Your most loving brother in Christ, Richard Cox. [2 Namely, Dr Whitgift's reply to Cavtwright's " Admonition to the Par- liament," for an account of which see Strypo. Life of Whituift. i. 00. &c.] 474< BISHOP cox TO H. BULLINGER. [lET. CXCIX. BISHOP COX TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 121.] Ely, July 20, 1574. I UNDERSTAND from your letter, which, written last spring, I received in the month of June, that the letter which I -oTote to you in the year 1573 had not been delivered. This circumstance might aiford you reason to suspect that I had neglected writing. Such neglect, my dearly beloved brother in Christ, would certainly have been criminal, had I suffered myself so to be branded with the mark of ingratitude as to be inattentive to the letters of my friends, so pious and learned and full of kmdness, and neglected to return a courteous answer. I wrote a letter to you, I hope not an ungrateful one, in the year 1573, which, with a Uttle present \ (trifling as it was,) I gave in charge to one Eichard Hilles, by whose means it was to be delivered to you. If this has not been done, I will endeavour to ascertain without loss of time, by whose fault the failure of it has been occasioned. I understand from your letter, that you are not labouring under such a decay of old age as to be unable to discharge without inconvenience the trust committed to you. This [blessing] you have, in my opinion, obtained, partly by habit, the teacher of all things, and partly by the pious feeUng with which you have ever been actuated, so as never to have ceased to promote with- out intermission the interests of the gospel and of godliness ; but, most of all, because, inflamed by the Spirit of Christ, you have always obeyed its motions. However it be, I heartily congratulate both yourself and the church of Christ, that after so many labours accomplished for the glory of God, you have at length arrived at a vigorous old ao-e, and which still retains its interest in behalf of all the churches : and this indeed is evident from your Avintings, in which you instruct, advise, comfort, not only the church of Zurich, but the truly universal church of Christ. Your little book on persecutions is especially useful in these latter times, wicked and dangerous as they are, to confirm the godly in the patience of Christ and in the purity of religion. You are mistaken if you suppose that I understand German.- It is now about fifteen years since I had a very slight knowledge of that language ; but I will take care that your Swiss sermons shall be translated into Latin, that I may peruse them with greater delight and profit. I grieve that your churches are disturbed by these unhappy controversies : how truly did Christ say that the \} Six crowns. Sec p. 422.] CXCIX.] BISHOP COX TO H. BULLINGER. 475- enemy soweth tai'es ! Oh, may we, all of us, at length be made good ground ! Our puritan brethren are now lying in concealment, partly terrified by the authority of our queen, and partly silenced by a most able treatise written by a most learned man^. Mean- while, we know not what monstrosities they are hatching in secret. Certain of our nobihty^, pupils of the Roman pontiff, either weary of their happiness or impatient of the long continued progress of the gospel, have taken flight, some into France, some into Spain, others into different places, with the view of plotting some mischief against the professors of godliness. So difficult is it to keep the church of Christ in a state of defence against the ministers of Satan. But the strength of the Lord and his strong tower have hitherto defended us ; and the Lord will defend his own even to the end, in spite of the chafing and assaults of those two antichrists. Li the mean time we must entreat the Lord night and day to arise and let his enemies be scattered. May the Lord Jesus make your old age of long continuance to his church! As to myself, though in my 75th year, by the blessing of God I am in good health, except that the trembling of my hands makes it difficult for me to write. Farewell, my very dear brother in Christ. From the Isle of Ely, in England, July 20, 1574. Your most attached brother in Christ, Richard, first minister of the church at Ely. CC. W. COLE TO R. GUALTER. [B. 102.] Oxford, July 31, 157-1. Your son, I perceive, most learned sir, has made arrangements for his return, having been most fully assured, by Simler's letter, of your pleasure respecting him. Though he was on many accounts very dear to me, as commended to me more than once not only by your letters, but by those of the bishop of Norwich ; yet I must candidly confess that he has so conducted himself during the short time he has resided amongst us, that of his own right, even if neither of you had been known to me, or had written a word in his behalf, he is entitled on his departure from us to return to his friends with some token of my love. And I much regret that he is so suddenly summoned away from hence, as that by reason of [2 Namely, Dr Whitgift. See note 2, p. 473.] [■' Among whom were Lord Edward Seymour, Lord Morley, the arch- hishop of Cassel, and the bishop of Meath. A complete list is given by Strype, Annals n. i. 495 ; ir. ii. 551.] 476 \V. COLE TO R. GUALTER. [lET. the shortness of time I am not able to honour him as I could wish. For as I was in hopes that he Avould make a longer stay with us, I confess that I have not treated him according to his merit. And yet as often as he came to see me, he could not but be a most welcome guest : for whenever he was with me, there immediately came into my mind the numberless benefits with which you loaded us EnsrUsh when we. were exiles at Zurich. If you would know what I myself think of your son, I dare make this affirmation respecting him, that he is a youth excellent in morals, pious in religion, and one who has made no moderate progress in learning. And though I myself were silent, our whole university would bear witness to the truth of what I am writing. For, though he is a Swiss by nation, he will nevertheless, even at Zurich, when separated from us by so long a distance, be an Oxford master of arts, having been raised to this degree of honour among us by unanimous consent. Master Humphrey has given me Simler's book, which he pub- lished against the Brentians. I must therefore return everlasting thanks to you, for having sent me the book ; to him, as the pro- tector and champion of the church ; and to both of you, because you will not allow the enemy to attack the sheepfold at his plea- sure. May the Lord preserve you, and grant you a very long life for the common benefit of all godly persons ! Salute, I pray you, the reverend old man, master Bullinger, besides two, who are for many reasons to be especially honoured by me, Lavater and Simler ; likewise the printer Froschover, and his corrector, my friend Julius, who was intimately known to me when with Peter Martyr at Strasburgh. If you think that I can in any way be useful here in England, either to yourself or any of your friends, you will find me most entirely at your service. Oxford, from the college of Corpus Christi, July 30, 1574. Yours, as long as I live, William Cole. CCI. L. HUMPHREY TO R. GUALTER. [A. 122.] Oxford, Aug. 2, 15/4. Immanuel. Health in Christ Jesus, most esteemed Gualter. Your son returns to you, not, as you state', a prodigal, but im- proved both in learning and manners. For my own opinion [1 See p. 469, n. ?,.] CCI.] L. HU.MPHREV TO R. GUALTER. 477 respecting him, as well as that of the whole university, will easily be seen by their very copious testimonals. He so lived amongst us, that all are unanimous in praise of his modesty, his frankness, his many and great virtues ; and consider you most fortunate, that the Lord hath given you such a Gualter as the inheritor of your name and piety. The bishop of Norwich will address you by letter, of whom I shall say nothing ; for he is sufficiently known to you, and your son can bear ample testimony that he has never found his munificence straitened towards himself. But since he will explain by letter both the cause of your son's return and other mat- ters of the like kind, there is no occasion for me to repeat them to no purpose. Dr Parkhurst has informed me that it is your desire, and I have also learned by other letters from Zurich that his friends are desirous, that at his present age he should think both about a matrimonial connection, and also about entering upon the ministry. That all things may turn out for him most happily and auspiciously, is my most earnest prayer. I have received the copy of your treatise on Christ's presence on earth, but have nothing to send you in return, unless you wish to see my, or rather your^ Jewel, whom I now send by my friend Gualter, and beg you both to correct and take in good part this trifling present. We are here, by the blessing of God, in the possession of peace, and the pearl of the gospel, and pray that we may long enjoy them. Our neighbour's wall is on fire, and we are greatly afraid lest some spark of that fire should set us in a flame. So heed- less are we, and unconcerned, that we seem to be daily kindlino- the flames of divine wrath. May the Lord Jesus, rememberino-, not our merits, but his mercy, avert every evil, and preserve your church, our fathers and brethren, Bullinger, Simler, Lavater and the rest, together with yourself and family ! In haste, at Oxford, Aug. 2, 1574. Yours, Laurence Humphrey. [2 The Arclibishop [Parker] and the Bishop of London [Sandys], knowino- the eloquence of Dr Laurence Humphi-ey's Latin pen, sent to him to Oxon commending the writing of Jewel's life to him ; who finished and pubhshed it anno 1573, and dedicated his work to those two venerable prelates. StrjTje, Life of Parker, ii. 50.] 478 BISHOP SANDYS TO H. BULLINGEK. [lET. ecu. BISHOP SANDYS TO H. BULLINGER. [A, 123.] FuLHAM, Aug. 9, 1574. Much health in Christ, most esteemed sir and reverend father, I thank you most sincerely for your very ready and affectionate inclination to write to me ; for indeed nothing could have been more gratifying to me than to ascertain your opinion respecting the mat- ters in dispute. You write most fully your own judgment concern- ino- the whole affair : I see and embrace it. But I hope that this new fabric of new discipline will shortly fall in pieces by its own weight, since it appears that many of our countrymen who formerly admired it, are noAv grown weary of it ; and those who seemed most zealous in the establishment of this new platform, have now begun to grow wonderfully cool, as it were, through a change of opinion. May the Lord grant that, all our dissensions and strife being re- moved, we may all of us speak and think the same thing according to Jesus Christ, and that we may with one mind and mouth glorify God, even the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ ! I will not write to you about the affairs of England, since the pious and learned^ young man, who will bring you this letter, will give you certain information respecting them. The pirates of Flushing have intercepted the first ^ piece of cloth that I sent you ; I ordered a second piece to be sent you, which I hear has come safe to hand. Farewell, most esteemed sir. I earnestly entreat you to commend me to God in your prayers. In haste. Fulham in England, Aug. 9, 1574. Your brother in Christ, and most affectionate, Edwin Sandys, bishop of London. CCIII. BISHOP SANDYS TO II. GUALTER. [A. 124.] Fulham, Aug. 'J, 1574. Health to you, most learned sir, and very dear brother ! There is no need for me to write to you. Lo ! receive your son. He will be to you in the place of a letter from me, as one who will be able fully to acquaint you with the present state of our affairs in England. Our innovators, who have been striving to strike out for tis a new form of a church, are not doing us much harm ; nor is this new fabric of theirs making such progress as they expected. [1 Rodolph Gualtcr. See p. 473.] [2 Sec p. 4-10.] CCIII.] BISHOP SANDYS TO K. GUALTER. 479 Our nobility arc at last sensible of the object to which this novel fabrication is tending. The author of these novelties, and after Beza the first inventor, is a young Englishman, by name Thomas Cartwright^ who, they say, is now sojourning at Heidelberg. He has lately written from thence* a treatise in Latin, in defence of this new discipline which he wishes to obtrude upon us. I have not yet seen the book, but I hear that it is printed, and has been brought over to us. As soon as it shall come into my hands, I will take care it shall be sent you. Respecting other matters which arc agitated here, your son will give you information. He is preparing for his journey, and I for the public affairs of the church, with which I am overwhelmed. The first piece of cloth that I sent you was taken by pirates : I sent you another, which the merchant tells me that you have re- ceived. It is well if it is so. Farewell, most esteemed sir, and continue to love me as you do. In haste. Fulham in England, Aug. 9, 1574. Your brother and friend in Christ, Edwin Sandys, bishop of London. [3 Thomas Cartwriglit was sometime fellow of St John's, and afterwards of Trinity, Cambridge : he was deprived of his fellowship for not taking orders according to the statutes. His controversy with Whitgift has before been alluded to. See note 1, p. 452, and Soames's Elizabethan History, p. 141, where his character is drawn at length. Beza, in a letter to one of his English correspondents, thus expressed himself concerning Cartwriglit : "Here is now with us your countryman, Thomas CartwTight, than whom I tliink the sun does not see a more learned man." [4 Soames gives the following extract from a letter from Wilcox to Gilby, dated Feb. 2, 1574. " Our brother Cartwright is escaped, (God be praised!) and departed this land, since my coming up to London, and I hope, is by this time at Heidelberg." A warrant had been issued for his apprehension, to be attributed probably, Mr Soames thinks, to the fear of assassination engen- dered in Elizabeth and her advisers, by the fatal ebullition of insanity then lately manifested by Peter Bu'chet, in the murder of a man whom he mistook for Sir Christopher Hatton. Among the signatures to this warrant, besides that of Sandys, are those of Nowell and Goodman, and nine others of the High Commission. See Soames's Elizabethan History, p. 19S.] 480 QUEEX ELI/ARETH TO J. STURMIUS. [l,ET. CCIV. QUEEN ELIZABETH TO J. STURMIUS^ [B. 103.] Bath, Aug. 23, 1574. ELIZABETH R. Elizabeth, by the grace of God, of England, France and Ireland, queen, &c., to John Sturmius, greeting. Your letter dated at Northeim, on the 3rd of August, we re- ceived on the 18th of the same month ; from which we understand your anxiety about our affairs, and how exceedingly you desire that peace and tranquillity may bo established between christian sovereigns and their dominions. And indeed we cannot but greatly approve their exertions, who, by embassies, or any other suitable means, [endeavour to] unite them, that discords may be composed between neighbouring nations, and especially between those which profess [the gospel of] Christ. For this is the noble office of a neighbouring and christian prince. As we have received so few letters from you, we think that they have not all reached us. As to other matters, we have com- manded our secretary, Thomas Smith, to write you our opinion in detail. Farewell. From our city of Bath", Aug. 23, 1574, and in the 16th year of our reign. T. Smith. CCV. R. GUALTER TO BISHOP COX. [B. 104.] Zurich, Attg. 2f), 1574. Health. I hope, reverend father in Christ, that ray last letter, written in the month of March^, has safely reached you. I have received yours, written in the month of February'', by the hands of our friends on their return from the spring fair. But I do not think there is any occasion for a tedious and laborious exam- ination of it, since I declared in that letter of mine what I tliought of those turbulent innovators, and so anticipated your letter in which you complain of them, and not without reason. And indeed the examples which the hke innovators are every day affording us in Germany, powerfully induce me to persist in my opinion. For I perceive that nothing can be imagined more ambitious, more inso- [1 The original of this letter is preserved at Zofingen. The queen's name at the head is autograph.] [2 The queen made a progress to Bristol this year, and returned by Salisbui-y.] [3 Sec Letter CXCIV. p. 464.] [» See Letter CLXXXIX. p. 452.] CCV,] R. GUALTER TO BISHOP COX. 481 lent, and more absurd, than these men. For though they are daily acting in many respects most iniquitously, they are neverthe- less not ashamed to pretend a zeal for God in those things which, contrary to the word of God, they impiously and maliciously devise against the servants of Christ. And, as far as I can conjecture, many persons, by whose counsel and assistance the fabric of this discipline was chiefly erected heretofore, are now ashamed of them. And by what spirit they are actuated, may be gathered from this, that they are so anxious for the attainment of their object, as to deprive parties who deserve well of the church, of the possession and management of ecclesiastical property, without perceiving in the mean time what will be the consequence, should they effect this ; namely, that it will come into the hands of others, from whom what is necessary for the support of rehgion will by no pos- sibility be extorted in future. They would rather, indeed, have it alienated from the churches altogether, than see it in the power of those whom they have once begun to hate. But this is the nature of mankind, not to be able to bear happiness in possession, and to seek for themselves of their own accord evil and anxiety. Never- theless, it should be your endeavour to oppose these troublesome parties with meekness and prudence, lest some more grievous danger may at length arise out of these contentions ; or lest those, who are still opposed to purer religion, may find an opportunity of effecting what they have long desired^, &c. CCVI. BISHOP COX TO H. BULLINGER. [A. 125.] Ely, Jan. 25, 1575. Health in Christ. I confess myself, my very dear brother, greatly in your debt, for having so courteously addressed me by letter, although it was a short one. Your occasional illness is not to be wondered at, seeing old age itself is a kind of disease. Should you discontinue your literary exertions, I shall in the mean time content myself with what you have by the blessing of God written heretofore, to his glory and the edifying of his church. But may God bestow upon you sufficient strength for the perform- ance of what you are piously proposing to accomplish ! I rejoice exceedingly that harmony is restored among you. AVith ourselves, the faction is become in some measure less active through fear of [5 The remainder of this Letter is wanting. The original fragment is in Gualter's hand.] 31 482 BISHOP cox TO H. BULLINOER. [lETj punishment ; for our government is apprehensive that danger may arise from frivolous and unnecessary innovations. And by the same fear do they keep within bounds the fury of the papists. We hear, however, that in France the adherents of the pope are bringing matters to the last extremities. May the Lord Jesus vouchsafe to be present with his people ! Oh that the Lord would bow the heavens and come down, and bridle the mouths of the papists, Tm'ks, and schismatics! But our sins will not suffer him. God grant that we may all strive together for that unity to which, by numerous and solid arguments, you beautifully exhort all the clergy. Salute my brethren in my name, as opportunity presents itself. I send a small testimony of my regard to be divided between your- self and Julius, and I commend myself to your prayers. May the great and good God preserve you and your most rehgious city ! From the Isle of Ely in England, Jan. 25, 1574, according to our computation. Your most attached and very dear brother in Christ, Richard, bishop of Ely. CCVII. W. BARLOW TO J. SIMLER. [B. 105.] Eton, Jan. 2b, 1575. Much health. Your letter of the 10th of March 1574, which was the first that came to hand after the receipt of the cloth, and informed me of it, was brought me only on the 28th of August last : mention is made therein of another letter written in December, which (notwithstanding another December has now elapsed) I have not yet seen. You may imagine the rest, how trustworthy and regular are our couriers. But, to speak candidly Avhat I think, I was in some doubt, until that 28th of August, whether you had received the cloth with the letter, or not. One great cause of their longer delay, besides the length of the journey, (for they go round by Hamburgh,) was my not having been so frequently either in London or at Oxford, but in the west of England, where your letter at last reached me. Three weeks after the receipt of it, I went to Oxford for the sake of meeting our friend llodolph Gualter, that I might confer with him about this whole business ; but contrary to my expectation, and to my great vexation, he had already em- barked with a most excellent and noble youth, the lord PhiHp', [1 See above, Letter CLXXVI. p. 422.] CCVll.J W. BAKLOW TO J. SIMLEK. 483 baron of Hohensaxe, to whom, if it had pleased God, I would, as a matter of courtesy, most willingly have paid my respects in Eng- land. You see therefore, my Simler, that it is not owing to any neglect of mine that I have not hitherto answered your letter ; neither have I given a commission to any one to demand the money from Froschover in my name. For I am sure, unless I am greatly mistaken, that I expressly wrote to you, not by any means to send the money, before you had let me know what you thought of the cloth, whether you liked it or not; and that I would then take care to have some one at Frankfort to receive the money, and to make some piu-chases for me there : which was quite enough to reheve you from all that trouble and anxiety, by which I see from your last IcJtter, of the 28th of August, you were so disturbed. And I have therefore given you this explanation in detail, with the view of driving away that anxiety about money matters altogether from your thoughts. For I am under some apprehension lest your next letter also should bring some complaints upon this subject : but as soon as tliis shall come to hand, (which I hope will very soon be the case,) I feel quite assured you will be abundantly satisfied. The misfortune which you describe of the Wittenbergers has greatly affected me ; it makes me uncertain what to hope, or what to fear : I allow it is most distressing, and threatens, as it Avere, the ruin and destruction of that most flourishing university. This indeed I think is to be lamented by me in common with the whole race of students : yet on the other hand, since Wittenberg is a city which formerly possessed the most decided supporters of the truth, and who feared God rather than man ; that she is in this respect still going on in the old way, is, I say, a ground on which, together with all godly persons, I ought to congratulate her, and to pray Almighty God to make those men, who are most renowned in every kind of learning, constant unto the end ; to increase and crown in them the gifts which he has bestowed. I will diligently inform you, God wilUng, of the state of our qhurch, as soon as I know it myself; which in truth is not yet the case ; for there are some mysteries about it which I cannot yet fathom. Two famous divines arc now lecturing in London ; the one a Frenchman, the other a Spaniard. The Frenchman's name is Villers"', a man of great learning and piety : the Spaniard's is [■•i This seeins to bo tho saiiio Villei-s that Camden mentions. Hist. p. 209, as havino- been a preacher in Franco, who camo to England (I suppose to avoid i)orsccution) in a threadbare cloak, and grew rich here by a common 31—2 484 W. BARLOW TO J. SIMLEK. [lET. Corranus\ learned and eloquent, but some worthy men entertain great doubts whether in respect of piety he is to be compared with Villers. He is wont to disparage the authority of some individuals, who have deserved exceedingly well of the church : he is a great admirer of Castalio^ of whose version of the bible he declares this opinion, that he is a very bad interpreter, for he has given any thing rather than a literal translation ; but if you speak about a paraphrase, then, says he, Castalio excels all other translators by many leagues. I know also, that he made earnest enquiry of a person of my acquaintance, whether or not he had some dialogues^ on the Trinity by an anonymous individual, printed at Basle, but Castaho, he said, is thought to have been the author of them ; and he added that he was very anxious to procure them. I was pre- sent at an excellent lecture of his, in which he inveighed against the men of our age, some of whom wish to be called Lutherans, others Calvinists, &c. though neither Calvin nor Luther died for us ; but we are saved, he said, by the blood of the Lamb slain "for the sins of the world," whereas in the text it is, "from the beginning of the world." But that I may not seem to strain out a gnat^ and perhaps swallow a camel, I will here conclude, though indeed I am afraid of being a gnat to a camel. I wish he had staid at Compostella ! I pray you, tell my friend Julius that I am much concerned not to be able to satisfy his wishes, but that I cannot yet discover who were master Jewel's executors, or in what way he left his pro- perty^. Tell him too, that it is not an easy matter for an indi- vidual so little known as myself, to gain access to the earl of collection for him, for reading a divinity lectm-e. Ho was afterwards chap- lain to the prince of Orange. Strype, Whitgift, i. 477.] [1 See p. 471.] [2 The Latin version of Sebastian Chatillon, or Castalio, was begun at Geneva in 1542, and finished at Basle in 1550, where it was printed in the following year, with a dedication to Edward VI. The best edition of his version is that at Leipsic, 1738, in 4 vols. 12mo, but the folio edition of 1573 is in most request. Home's Introduct. il. 225.] [3 The title of this book is " Bernardini Ochini Senensis Dialogi xxx, in duos libros divisi, quorum primus est de Messia, continetque dialogos xviii. Sccundus est cum de rebus variis, turn potissimum de Trinitate. Basil, 1563.'* Castalio, it appears, was the translator into Latin of this and some other works of Ochinus.] [• This is tho rendering of most of the versions prior to tho Authorised in IGll, which has strain at. Matth. xxiii. 24.] P Bishop Jewel bequeathed his estate chiefly for tho maintenance of students. Strype, Parker, ii. 49.] CCVII.] W. BARLOW TO J. SIMLER. 485 Bedford, to plead his cause before him ; though I have given the letter that Julius put into my hands for that purpose, to his secre- tary, who promised me that he would recommend it to his master as favourably as he could. I earnestly pray you to salute dutifully in my name the very reverend fathers BuUinger, Gualter, my most courteous host master Wickius, masters Lavater, Stuckius, Henry Bullinger the younger, Lemann, Haller, James Frisius, Gualter the younger, Julius, and all the rest. I had intended to send to you, and to that excellent man master Lavater, and others, some treatises printed in England, not however of any great consequence, by the hands of our friend Gualter ; and should certainly have loaded him with commissions, had I known of his going away, which, by reason of my being employed in the west of England, it was impossible I could do. We have nothing new here, unless it be a new thing to hold a wolf by the ears, or cherish a snake in one's bosom ; which things have ceased to be novelties in this country : for the queen" of the north, the plague of Britain, the prince of darkness in the form of a she- wolf, is still kept in custody among us. With respect to, money matters, I have written to Froschover. But I am longer than I wish to be, and I fear lest I should be troublesome to you : which however I will nowise believe, if you will send me a long letter in return ; for your letters are very gi'atifying and dehghtful to me. I reside for the most part with my very dear relative, master William Day^, provost of the king's college of Eton, near Windsor, twenty miles from London ; where we very often talk together about you with great delight, as well of your churches, as of your public affairs : you must suppose how- ever that we shall do this with greater accuracy, if you will persist in your intention, and not stand waiting for I know not what coadjutors, from this or that place, or for some one in your stead. Our friend Julius has sent me a prospectus of this expected work, [c Viz. Mary queen of Scots, who was at this time, 1575, confined in Sheffield castle.] [■? William Barlow was son of bishop Barlow, one of whose daughters married the William Day here mentioned, and who was afterwards bishop of Winchester. Another married, first, Matthew Parker, the son of the arch- bishop of Canterbury, and secondly, Tobias Matthew, archbishop of York. The three remaining daughters became the wives respectively of bishops W(3stphaling of Hereford, Overton of Lichfield and Coventry, and Wick- ham of Lincoln.] 486 W. BARLOW TO J, SIMLER. [lF.T. which indeed I have not yet been able to read, by reason of some troublesome engagements that have arisen from the death of ano- ther relative of mine, the son of the archbishop of Canterbury ; for he also had married one of my sisters, and has lately died. Salute, I pray you, all your friends in my name. Again and again fare- well. January 25, 1575. Yours wholly, William Barlow. If at any time you can find leisure to send me a print of the battle of SempachS somewhat coloured, the military standards especially, you will do me a very great favour. Once more fare- well. CCVIII. BISHOP COX TO R. GUALTER. [A. 12G.] Ei.\, [1575.] Health in Christ. On IN'ovember 7th, a.d. 1574, I received your letter dated on the 26th of August of the same year, by which I learn your most correct judgment respecting those who are so tenacious of their own opinion as that they know not how to yield to truth, and are loth to depart from their preconceived notions. They complain that we treat them with severity, while in the mean time they attack us with the most bitter abuse, both in public and private ; and every where calumniate us in their sermons and printed writings. They are replied to by our friends with sufficient moderation ; and in the mean time our excellent queen, a sincere lover of truth and peace, attacks them with the authority of the law ; by which they are somewhat terrified, and are gradu- ally slipping away : except that from time to time they vomit forth the venom of strife in secret. I cannot but admit that we have been aided by your pious and learned writings, although our adver- saries did not consider them of so much importance, I hope also that the treatise of that venerable old man, master Henry Bullinger, in which he invites and persuades the ministers of the churches to unity, will be of great benefit to this kingdom : I wish it might be so throughout all Germany. I am exceedingly grieved at the per- secutions that have lately taken place in Saxony " : that Lutheran [1 The battle of Sempach between the Swiss and Austrians was fought A.D. 1386, and terminated in the defeat and death of Lcopokl of Austria.] [2 This refers to the famous convocation of Thori^au summoned in 1574 by Augustus, elector of Saxony ; where, after a strict inquiry into the doctrines of those who, from their secret attachment to the sentiments of CCVIII.] mSHOP cox TO R. GUALTER. 487' party is very cruel. May the Lord vouchsafe to aid those who are sincerely pleading his cause ! Oh, the enemy of mankind, who, wherever the good seed is sown, ceases not to sow tares among them ! Meanwhile by the grace of God we must do our best, and leave the issue to the Lord our God. The Lord hitherto by his favour preserves us af, peace. The papists are grumbling, and nursing I know not what monstrosity. But may God himself destroy the wicked, and long preserve you in safety to his church ! Commend me to God in your prayers. From the Isle of Ely in England. Your very dear brother in Christ, Richard Cox, bishop of Ely. CCIX. BISHOP COX TO R. GUALTER. [A. 127.] Ely, Juhj 31, 157r). Your letter, most learned Gualter, and very dear brother in the Lord, dated March 8th, 1575, was delivered to me in the May of the same year, and read by me with much pleasure. For it is full of grateful acknowledgement, and speaks much more highly of me than I can admit with truth. I cannot think without admiration of divine Providence, who at one time tries his people in the fire of affliction, at another affords them breathing time, and allows them the enjoyment of a most delightful calm. Although our sins deserve the severest punishment, we trust notwithstanding that our Lord Jesus Christ has his httle flock, by whose piety and prayers the most righteous vengeance of God is wont to be turned aside and stopped. But most wretched is the condition of the hypocrites, whom the Lord in his most righteous judgment, on account of their overflowing wickedness, is wont to deliver into the hands of the destroyer ; such as are at this time the Turk, the pope, and the furious band of schismatics. And this band indeed among us by their plausible doctrine easily allure the nobility into their net ; while by their great noise and clamour they subvert the credulous minds of wretched persons, and especially those who are gaping, hke hungry wolves and ravens, after the revenues of the cathedral churches, colleges, and bishops. Thus Satan employs every engine to overthrow the gospel. I am much grieved that the Swiss divines, were called Crypto-Calvinists, he committed some of them to prison, sent others into banishment, and engaged a certain number, by the force of the secular arm, to change their sentiments. See Mosheim.] 488 BISHOP cox TO R. GUALTER. [lET. . that Saxon ^ is so much incensed against the godly. Nor do I less grieve for that afflicting inteUigence "which is brought us, that the most solid pillar of the church, master Henry Bullinger, is labour- ing under a most severe disease. May our gracious Lord have compassion on his church, and restore his Henry to his former health ! But should it seem good to the divine mercy to place him in his heavenly tabernacle, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ must be entreated to pour down the spirit of this second Elijah upon the many Ehshas, who by the singular grace of God may now be sojourning in the most pious city of Zurich. There have been lately removed from us by death, having ob- tained a better condition with Christ, Parkhurst^, the bishop of Norwich, and Matthew Parker^, •archbishop of Canterbury and primate of all England, a man of an even and firm character, and a zealous defender of true rehgion. We must entreat the Lord that he may vouchsafe to send labourers not less suitable into his harvest, which is very abundant. May the Lord Jesus very long preserve you in safety to his church ! From the Isle of Ely in England. July 31, 1575. Your very dear brother in Christ, Richard, bishop of Ely. CCX. N. BERNIUS TO BISHOP HORN. [B. 106.] Guernsey, Dec. 13, 1575. To the reverend father in Christ, the lord bishop of Win- chester, Nicholas Bernius, minister of the word of God, in the name of the church of Guernsey wishes grace and health from the Lord. As nothing has been at any time more desired by us, and more agreeable to us, reverend sir, than that an occasion should be offered of making you acquainted with the condition and prosper- ous beginnings of our churches, and especially of assuring you of [1 See note 2, p. 486.] [2 Parkhurst died about the 2nd of February, 1575. See Strype, Parker, II. 362. Like the othex- winters of these letters, he kept up his corre- spondence with the divines of Zui'ich to the end of his life.] [3 Parker died May 17, 1575, having "closed a difficult, upright life, with all the foresight, firmness, and complacency, that marked a vigorous, equable, and religious mind." See Soames's Elizabethan Hist. p. 205, •where his character is given at length, and also as described by Hallam, Neal, Fuller, and others.] CCX.] N. BERNIUS TO BISHOP HORN. 489 our duty, or rather of our respectful attachment, towards you ; so indeed nothing has been more grievous and distressing to us, thaa that a subject should now be forced upon us, whereby we are rather compelled to use the language of complaint to you our father, than to congratulate you upon our prosperous advancement in the work of Christ. We should not indeed do this, were it not that in this matter, which belongs also to your office, we have very great need of your assistance and authority : yet we are, neverthe- less, to be pardoned, if we are forced to bring you disagreeable intelligence, respecting which we entreat you, in all christian love, to allow us to treat with you at some length, as with one, of whose sincere zeal towards the church of Christ we cannot entertain a doubt. There has sprung up among the inhabitants of this place a certain Elias Bonamy, a disorderly character, and one not less notorious for impiety and obstinacy than he is powerful in wealth and friends. God seems to have visited in his generation by his just judgment the iniquity of his father*, who formerly everywhere persecuted with extreme hatred the church of Christ with fire and sword, even to the last moment of his existence. This man, having been admitted five years since into the congregation of the church, solemnly promised his minister, according to our practice, that he would faithfully obey the word of God and his church, as it becomes a true member of Christ ; and for the first three years he pretended that his mind was not opposed to religion : but for tlie last two years, to our great grief and sorrow, his hypocrisy has been discovered, and he has so neglected the preaching of God's word, as never to present himself for the hearing of it unless com- pelled to do so, and then as seldom as possible ; and, what is far more grievous, he has for these three whole years abstained from the lioly supper of the Lord, to the great offence of the weak; and has drawn away by his example many from the sacraments, who would at length have fallen away from the church, had not God in pity to them, according to his mercy, brought them back into the way of salvation through the watchfulness of their pastor. Tlie minister meanwhile, in the fiiithful discharge of his office, privately [^ This person seems to have been the I'eter Bonamy mentioned by Foxe, as one of the jurats who condemned three women to be burned in Guernsey, in July 1556. He probably died before 1562, as his name does not appear among those who received the queen's pardon upon their submission and confession of their erroneous judgments. See Foxo's Acts and Monuments, vni. 228, ed. 1839.] 490 N. BERNIUS TO BISHOP HORN. ' [lKT; and frequently admonishes this man in a friendly manner, and endeavours by every possible means to recal the wanderer into the path ; but to no purpose, such is the obstinacy of the man. He does not, however, give up the attempt, but again reminds him of his dutv in a temperate and christian manner, in the presence of one or two of the elders of the church ; and earnestly entreats him to appear before the presbytery, that he may hear somewhat for the glory of God and the salvation of his soul. But the more leniently he is dealt with, the more obstinate he becomes, and pays no more regard to the authority of the ecclesiastical synod, than he did to the majesty of God and of the sacraments. I pass over his scoffing at the assembly of the church, and omit his gibes upon the ministers of Christ and the elders of the church. So when his obstinacy seemed incapable of being restrained by any laws either human or divine, [his minister] consulted his godly and learned brethren, the servants of Christ, respecting this case, as he con- sidered the matter seemed to call for this proceeding ; both that a seasonable remedy might be applied to so great an evil, and also that nothing might be determined upon in the church, except what might tend to profit and edification. These persons think that a matter of such importance should be referred to a synod, in which it should be judged of by the word of God alone. All the ministers^ therefore, of the word of God in this island, together with some of the elders of their churches and certain godly magistrates, are summoned to a conference, at which our Elias is ordered to be pre- sent, that he may hear the proceedings and accusations brought against him, and if he has any means of justifying, or defending, or excusing himself, have free liberty of replying. After artfully endeavouring to turn aside and ward off some of the charges, he pretends that he knows nothing of any church gathered together in this place, and that he acknowledges no presbytery here : at length, however, convicted both by his public actions and by unexcep- tionable Avitnesses, as though conscious of guilt, he acknowledges the offence, contumacy, and scandal that he has occasioned, and voluntarily submits himself to the judgment of the ecclesiastical court, not any one mistrusting him. Therefore, that we might not seem to have shut him out from all hope of his recovery, after we had taken proper cognizance of his delinquency and the scandal thereby occasioned, it was determined by the unanimous consent and opinion of all, that he should not only confess his error before the synod with prayer to God, but that, for the removing of the public scandal, he should make an open acknowledgement of his CCX.] N. BERNIIJS TO BISHOP HORN. 491 contumacy before the whole church, on Sunday the 27th of IN'o-' vember : and he was to do this after a sermon by the minister of the other church, by whom he was to be reconciled both to his own minister and to the church at large. Upon hearing the sentence of the church he began to shuffle, and positively refuses to make any public confession of his wickedness. But these are the artifices of Satan, with which you must be too well acquainted ; that, the con- sciences of the weak being wounded by scandals of this kind, he may either hinder or destroy the Lord's building. At length, how- ever, being influenced by our prayers, or admonitions out of the word of God, or rather alarmed, as it were by a thunderbolt, by the threatenings of his tremendous judgment, and the rod of excom- munication, he yields to the censure of the church ; and in the presence of our assembly suppliantly entreats forgiveness of God, and acknowledges his delinquency and contumacy ; and promises that he will do the same publicly in the church on the day appointed him. Up to this time, reverend sir, every thing went on happily enough : but it is wonderful and lamentable, that a man so often overcome by the word of God, so often warned by his ministers and friends, and, what is more, by the church herself, should not have seriously repented ; for on the appointed day, on which he had solemnly sworn that he would bear public testimony of his true repentance and contrite spirit, and make open confession of his fault to the glory of God, the edification of the church, and his own salvation ; regardless both of the divine judgment and of eccle- siastical authority, and also of his solemn promise, he perfidiously made answer, (at whose instigation I know not, except at Satan's,) and not without a contemptuous defiance of both the royal au- thority and your own, that we should sooner drag the moon from the sky with our teeth, than extort from him a public con- fession of his crimes ; nor (such is the hardness of his heart) can he be brought by any means to change this obstinate resolution of the carnal mind, or rather of the devil, and render due obedience to God and the church. The whole matter therefore was referred to the synod again assembled, to which this contumacious man was summoned, and where he made his appearance ; and as his hard- ened heart could by no means be brought to repentance, it seemed good to the church, acting by the authority of Jesus Christ and of his word, that by reason of his perfidy, contumacy, and impeni- tence, he should be publicly excommunicated on the next sacrament day in all our churches, as a rotten member, from the communioi) 492 N. BERNIUS TO BISHOP HORX. [lET, of the church of God and of his saints, and given over to Satan until he should repent. Confiding, honoured father, in your zeal for the advancement and protection of the church of Christ, we have not hesitated to give you a full account of the whole matter as it was conducted by us, with the greatest fidelity and truth ; and this, both that you may not be deceived by the lying impostures of this excommu- nicated man, should he chance to come over to you ; and also, that we ourselves may not be traduced by him as calumniators, both to yourself and to the holy fathers your colleagues. And we not only, all of us most earnestly entreat the interposition of your judg- ment and authority in this business ; but we implore also your helping hand, that (should there be any occasion for it) you will undertake and actively defend our cause, or rather your own and that of the infant church, before the queen's majesty herself; which labour that you will not refuse to undertake for Christ, we earnestly entreat you again and again, and, what is more, implore you by the name of Christ himself, whom we will constantly pray to guide you with his mighty hand, and to direct by his Spirit your counsels in so great a charge committed to you ; and that by the gift of true repentance he may bring back our wandering sheep (who deserves indeed the severest punishment in case of his non- repentance) into the way of salvation. Farewell, reverend sir, and love and protect both us and our brethren, and the whole church. Guernsey, Dec. 13, 1575. Your most obedient in Christ, N. Bernius, has written this to you in the name of the whole church. CCXI. BISHOP HORN TO BERNIUS, &c. [A. 130.] [Bishop's] Waltham, Jan. IG, 1576. Grace and peace in Christ. I am truly sorry, my very dear brethren in Christ, that such unprofitable folly can be found in any person, as that, when the enjoyment of a holy peace is within his power, he unhappily prefers to procure his individual quiet, as it would seem, by the discomfort of many ; when in fact, while he is labouring to satisfy his own blind, rash, and impious cupidity, he does not so much inconvenience others, as he rushes headlong into the greatest danger himself. But we are not ignorant of Satan's devices : and how prompt is his wicked inclination to disturb the tranquillity of the church, how adapted is his wicked counsel to CCXI.] BISHOP HORN TO BEUMUti, (fec. 493 the most flagitious actions, how he has his ministers ready pre- pared to do his bidding with carefulness and cunning, there is no occasion for me to tell you ; for who is such a novice in embracing the wholesome gospel of Christ as not to know it? You, my brethren, I am assured for certain, have learned from experience, I will not say by your own ill doing, but by the greatest incon- venience both of yourselves and the church; how many and what fearful deceivers Satan has heretofore raised up, and daily continues to do, that they may throw all things into confusion, and especially destroy the peace of the church. That outrageous beast is at- tacking the fold of Christ with all the ferocity in his power; that most malicious wolf is meditating the dispersion, yea, even the destruction, of the Lord's flock. The wretched sheep is dragged away by the cruel violence of the raging lion. What can you do ? We must resist the beast with unflinching faith, by imploring in our continual prayers succour from the chief Shep- herd, Jesus Christ ; and when the machinations of the wolf are laid open and detected, he must be driven away by the staff of the shepherds and the barking of the dogs ; the stupid herd must be snatched away from the claws of the lion, before they are torn in pieces by his teeth, and, if possible, brought back into the fold. In this respect, however, (as far as I can understand from your letter,) you have left nothing untried : you have .exerted all your care and diligence in preserving that mischievous Bonamy ; and, which is the duty of the most faithful pastors, you have used your active endeavours in softening, restraining, repressing his insolence, pride, and obstinacy, by every means in your power; and as you cannot accomplish what you desire, you require me to help you. Doubt not, my brethren, but that you will have many helpers ; and as for me, I profess myself most ready to afford my assistance in this matter, as far as I am able. I hope to bestow upon it such consideration as to make that false brother (if indeed he may be called a brother) feel what it is to provoke the chief Shepherd of souls, Jesus Christ, to despise the church of God, and to make a mockery of, yea, even to tread under foot, all godly discipline. I have explained the nature of what I propose to our common friend and brother in Christ, and one greatly beloved by me, master Leighton^ governor of the Isle. In fine, brethren, I en- [1 Sir Thomas Lcighton appears to have been governor of the island of Guernsey, from whence letters are dated from him to the earl of Leicester. Sec MSS. Cotton, Galba, u. i. 148, and n. 60.] 494 BISHOP HORN TO BERNIUS, &C. [lET. treat you to strive earnestly with me in your prayers to God for me. And for my part, I will not be unmindful of you, unless I am forgetful of myself. Salute, I pray you, from me all your fel- low-labourers and the whole church. Farewell. From my house at [Bishop's] Waltham, Jan. 16, 1576. Your very affectionate brother in Christ, and fellow-minister, Robert Horn, Winton. CCXII. W. BARLOW TO J. SIMLER. [B. 107.] Etox, March 13, 1576. Much health. How great a loss, my Simler, your church has sustained by the death of the elder Bullinger', of most happy memory, yea, and our church also, towards which I have heard that he always entertained a truly paternal and affectionate regard, and indeed all the churches of Christ throughout Europe, we shall all of us know by experience sooner than we wish. We must pray Almighty God, the Lord of the harvest, that he may send faithful labourers into his harvest ; and that, in pity to his flock, he may set over them faithful pastors, and burning with a zeal of God which is according to knowledge ; and that he may hasten the coming of the chief Shepherd, Jesus Christ. I wrote you word at the late autumn fair in 1575, that my lord bishop of Winchester had sent letters both to yourself and others ; which however, through the carelessness of those persons to whom he had entrusted this matter, I discovered to have been overlooked and not delivered to the merchant. I have taken upon myself the charge of preventing a repetition of this carelessness at the present fair ; and therefore, on the 5th of February, before he went to London to parliament^, I reminded the bishop, as he had often enjoined me to do, not to omit writing to his friends at Zurich. Well, he replied, I give you this commission, that you write to the merchant who is to take your letter, to call upon me in London for mine, which shall be sent at the same time with yours : for yours, said he, and those which are written to you^ have far better luck than mine ; for those which I last received from Zurich had been written two years before, and I very much doubt whether those which I myself wrote are even yet come to hand. This office, I said, I willingly take upon myself, but I will [1 BulUngei- departed this life Sept. 17, 1575.] [2 Parliament assembled this year on Wednesday the Sth of February.] CCXII.] W. BAKLOW TO J. SIMLER. 495 not write, to any one to call upon you for your letters ; for, God willing, I shall be in London before they set off for the fair, and will ask you for them myself, that you may not lay any of the blame of your neglect upon me : and when I call upon him, I will let him know that I have .now told you this. I send you, inclosed in this, a copy of two epistles^, in which you may easily perceive, (as the battle has been fought on a con- spicuous theatre,) what kind and degree of influence that feeble discipline of some parties, and which they so greatly boast of, pos- sesses in restraining any wicked profligate : and you may also per- ceive by them, that all our bishops are not so given to ease and indulgence, and destitute of all kindly feeling, as some calumniously represent them to be, but that there are some of them who dili- gently attend to the concerns of their brethren; and that their hateful power is not so detested, but that people flee to it of their own accord for succour, as a lame man to a horse, Guernsey, where these things have taken place, is an island in the Enghsh channel, subject to the kings of England, and in the diocese of Winchester. A certain Englishman, Laurence Bodley**, my most intimate friend, has informed me, that he is about this time going to Zurich: should he come to you, receive him, I pray you, with kindness (that is, according to your wont) : he is a man of small stature, but of distinguished erudition and probity, and exceedingly partial to your church. Master Pilkington^, bishop of Durham, a man inferior to none among us in learning and piety, died about two months since. We have, by the blessing of God, for archbishop of Canterbury master Grindal, a man in many respects most excellent : God grant that we may long retain him ! It is not yet known who will succeed him in the archbishoprick of York, but most persons think it will be the bishop of London ; and some individuals of no mean condi- tion are of opinion that my relative, master Wilham Day'', will succeed either to the bishoprick of London, if he go to York, or to that of Durham. I saluted him, as you bade me, in your name, which was very gratifying to him ; and he requested me to salute in his name yourself, and all of you in return, and moreover to [3 Namely, Letters CCX. and CCXL] I* Sir Thomas Bodley had a younger brother Laurence, who was probably the person here mentioned.] [5 Bishop Pilkington died Jan. 23, 1576.] [6 See p. 485, note 7.] 496 VV. BARLOW TO J. SIMLER. [ LET. ask you to admit him into the number of your friends. Salute respectfully in my name the most reverend father in Christ, master Gualter, master Lavater, my host master Wickius, masters Stuccius, Lemann, BuUinger, James Frisius, Froschover, and especially the younger Gualter and our friend Julius. Farewell. From Eton College, March 13, 1576. Yours, William Barlow. Three days after I had written the above, my Simler, on the night preceding the day on which I was to go to London, on that very night, I say, I was violently attacked by fever ; but it has much decreased during the last three days, so that I hope the Lord has now removed it. Farewell. Eton College, March 13. CCXIII. BISHOP COX TO R. GUALTER. [A. 128.] [1576.] Your last letter, most learned Rodolph, I received on the 13th of February. The preceding one however affected me much more forcibly, both with exceeding sorrow, and also with no common delight. My sorrow was excessive for the death of Henry BuUin- ger*, whom, by his letters, and learned and pious writings, I had been acquainted with, and I may say, known intimately for many years, although he was never personally known to me. Who would not be made sorrowful by the loss of such and so great a man, and so excellent a friend ? not to mention that the whole christian church is disquieted with exceeding regret, that so bright a star is forbidden any longer to shine upon earth. John writes, that inauspicious stars fell down from heaven^; but we are persuaded that our star has ascended up into heaven, and is fixed in heaven, and as it shone on earth, so it now shines more brightly in heaven. As to what he was on earth, his pious reputation is not silent, his pious life pro- claims, his most learned writings abundantly testify : and what he now is in heaven, God knows, the angels rejoice, and the souls of the godly exult. And this is no small consolation to tho^e who regret the loss of such a man. Add also another circumstance, from which I have, with good reason, received comfort, namely, that the church of Zurich, on Bullinger's bidding it farewell, is nevertheless not without a pastor. For the most gracious Lord, who never forsakes his flock, has set in the place of Bullinger yourself, [• Sou p, 4y4. n. 1.] [-i Revel, viii. 10, 12.] ccxrii ] BISHOP COX TO R. GUALTER. 497^ who possess no less zeal in feeding the flock, and no less courage in keeping off its enemies. Blessed are you, who have of your own inclination taken upon yourself this burden, that you may subserve the glory of God, and faithfully advance his religion. With respect to the disturbances and heresies of the churches, we know that there must needs be heresies that the elect may^ be proved ; and that through much tribulation we must enter into the kingdom of God, and in patience possess our souls. It is certainly much to be lamented that the Saxon ^ is so furiously hostile. May God grant, some time or other, a holy reconciliation ! We see no hope of peace in France. All things there are carried on in a ty- rannical manner. The king has decreed, with his brother and his mother, to send all the protestants into banishment, or else to put them to death. It is not yet fully known what is doing in Flanders, except that our queen is busy in setthng the disputes. Our men of singularity are quiet through fear of punishment, except that they are hatching I know not what mischief in secret. And those too, who pursue the cares and things of this world, give us much trouble ; for they are striving by I know not what arts and stra- tagems, to take away from us our property*, and reduce us to beggary, that they may bring us back to the condition of the pri- mitive church and the poverty of the apostles. May God have mercy upon his afflicted church, and defend it from the wickedness of the world; and may he bless you all, who profess Jesus Christ! I have sent you a small token of my regard, a part of which I wish you to bestow upon Julius Terentianus. Your brother in Christ Jesus, Richard Cox, [bishop] of Ely. CCXIV. H. ZANCHIUS TO ARCHBISHOP GRINDAL'*. [B. 108.] Heidelberg, July 22, 1576. The respect, most reverend lord, with which I have always regarded you by reason of your singular piety, courtesy, and virtue, [3 The Elector of Saxony. See note 2, p. 486.] [* The bishop had been required not long before to alienate Ely House in Holborn to Christopher Hatton, the queen's vice-chamberlain; and lord North also obtained letters from the queen to the bishop, dated in May, 1575, to part with the manor and lands of Somersham. For an account of these proceedings, and the bishop's behaviour in consequence, see Strype, Annals, u. i. 533, &c.] [^ This letter is given in Strvpe, Griiula!, 321, 557.] 32 498 H. ZANCHIUS TO ARCHRISHOP GRINDAL. [lETJ makes me unable to refrain from offering you my congratulations upon your recent and most honourable advancement', respecting which our common friend Knolles has written to me. For what greater dignity could be expected by you in that kingdom ? I con- gratulate you therefore most heartily, since these divine blessings are testimonies, both of your constant piety towards God, and of the unchangeable favour of God towards you. Nor do I less con- gratulate that whole kingdom for the same reason, that it has obtained of God such a primate, by whose care and diligence it may advance yet more and more in true rehgion and godliness. Nor do I doubt but that this accession of the highest dignity, next to that of the queen's majesty, will be a constant stimulus whereby you may be stirred up to the performance of your duty more dili- gently than ever, I also pray God to increase his gifts in you, and to bestow upon you strong and continued health, for the whole- some governing of his church. I am still living, and indeed, by the blessing of God am in good health for my age, as I am in my sixty-first year, with a wife and five cliildren, besides one who, I hope, will shortly make its appearance. These are also great blessings of God, for which I heartily thank him. It remains that he both replenish them with the gifts of his Spirit, and supply them with what is needful for their passing honourably through this present life, which I earnestly entreat him to do for Jesus Christ's sake ; and I commend them also, most noble archbishop, to yourself, and other friendly and excellent persons. May the Lord Jesus very long preserve you in safety for the welfare of his church ! We are in daily expectation of our Casimir^. Heidelberg, July 22, 1576. Your eminence's, &c. H. Zanchius. CCXV. BISHOP HORN TO R. GUALTER. [A. 129,] Waltham, Ang. 10, 157*>. Grace and peace in Christ ! Although the frequent and almost daily conversation, my very dear friend in Christ, which I have with my friend Barlow respecting our brethren at Zurich, is exceedingly delightful to me and full of interest ; yet my mind is [1 Archbishop Grindal was nominated to the see of Canterbury in Novem- ber, 1575, nearly six months after the death of archbishop Parker.] [2 Duke Casimir was the son of the Elector Palatine. See p. 156, n. 2.] CCXV.] BISHOP HORN TO R. GIJALTER. 499 not satisfied with that intercourse, gratifying as it is, nor can it rest without my conversing, at least by letter, with my friend Gualter, whom I dearly love, and through him with the other ministers of Zurich, who are so much esteemed by me. But my letter must be somewhat brief, because more abundant materials for writing do not at present occur to me. We have here scarcely any news to write about. All things, (praised be God !) remain satisfactorily enough in the same state. But those contentious, or, if you choose, vain-glorious, and certainly mischievous men, who by their ungovernable zeal for discord were retarding the free progress of the gospel among us, and drawing away the people, maddened by their folHes, through every vain variety of opinion, or rather madness of error, into what they call purity, are now silenced, sculk about, and are become of no im- portance. But how much you, Gualter, and the rest of our bre- thren yonder, who did not agree with them, are yet indebted to them, you may easily perceive if you will turn to the forty -sixth page of a book which one of them wrote " Concerning the de- parture of the church of England from true disciphne." Other matters indeed now continue among us as they were at first established, and especially peace and godliness. The gospel is flourishing, and has very free course. The church is sound in other respects, except that she is yet struggling with that old disease, under which she has laboured even from her infancy : for she will not entirely recover from popery before the last coming of that great physician, Jesus Christ. The government is at peace. The queen is alive and in good health ; and I pray God that she may continue to be so for many years, and that she may live for ever. The supreme assembly of all the states, which we call a parhament, was held at London at the beginning of spring ; but our queen, after your Swiss fashion^, will allow of no change, but is solely intent upon this object, to advance the truth of the gospel with full sails both at home and abroad. As she has always abominated popery from her infancy, so also will she never admit Lutheranism, which is a great disturber of Christianity. Scotland under her auspices continues stedfast in the pure pro- fession of the gospel. The king is imbued with the best precepts of true piety. His mother is detained in safe custody with us, as heretofore. You know the posture of affairs in France : we expect a happy issue in those of Flanders ; but avc are in much doubt [3 The bishop probably alludes to the rejection by the Swiss divines of Jacob Aiuh'oaj's Form of Concord.] 32—2 500 BISHOP HORN TO R. GUAT.TER. [lET. respectino- both. Our friend Pilkington\ the most vigilant bishop of Durham, died lately, and shortly before him my other half, my TV'ife. Salute, I pray you, from me all my Zurich brethren beloved in Christ, and especially masters Simler, Lavater, Haller, Rodolph Gualter the younger, and Henry BuUinger, now the elder. May the Lord Jesus Christ very long preserve you all safe for the edifi- cation of his church ! Farewell. From my house at [Bishop's] Waltham, Aug. 10, 1576. Your loving friend, and that of all the people of Zurich, liOBERT WiNTON. CCXVI. J. RAINOLDS^ TO R. GUALTER, JUN. [B. 112.] Oxford, Aug. 13, [1576.J In proportion to the infrequency of our intercourse, most accomplished Gualter, when you were resident among us, (not that I was wanting in inclination, but in the opportunity either of en- joying your friendship, or testifying my good will,) do I candidly acknowledge myself the more obliged to you, and exceedingly rejoice, that although separated by so great a distance, and wholly occupied by matters both of a public and a domestic nature, you nevertheless both retain in your mind, and cherish by your kindness, so grateful a remembrance of me. For if experience taught Aristotle that continued absence caused oblivion to cast a shade over friendship itself; that the flower as it were of our acquaintance (not the maturity of friendship), instead of withering away, should have grown up by length of absence, it would be un- grateful in me not to feel more gratifying in proportion as it has been unexpected. Your singular kindness in this respect has taught me how great is the ditference between a christian and a heathen friendship : the latter of which, according to Aristotle, oblivion obscures, by reason of long continued se})aration of j)ersons ; while the former, according to Gualter, is enlightened by christian love, by reason of the lasting union of souls. But, for my part, though I will never allow you to excel me in the love wherewith you love one who loves you in return ; yet I must necessarily allow [1 Bishop Pilkington died Jan. 23, 1.575—6.] [2 Jolm Rainolds became president of Corpus Christi College, and took a leading part in the Hampton Court conference in 1603. He was appointed one of the translators of the Bible, but died before the woi-k was finished, iu May 1607.] CCXVI.] J. RAINOLDS TO R. GUALTER. 501 you the priority in this respect, thcat you have preceded me in the manifestation of your regard. I admire your poem^, either because it is yours, or because it is what it is, or rather, for these reasons united. For, as far as I can judge, it is sprinkled over with splen- did evidences both of talent in the composition of the verse, and of judgment in the management of the subject, and of pious regard towards a well-deserving bishop, and of affection to the church of England, whose pious defender, Elizabeth, you commend, while you wound that cruel executioner, Bonner ; — scourge her bitter adversaries, the papists ; — comfort her afflicted members, the Christians ; — deplore her wretched condition as she is now in languishment ; — and, lastly, implore Christ Jesus to favour her with divine compassion. Your father prevented you from honouring our university with your praises by having preceded you in commending noble Oxford to the learned English, as " The home of Pallas, Phoebus and the Muses," far more, I am afraid, than she deserves : but we acknowledge his affection, and thank him for it, I warmly congratulate you upon having the charge of a church committed to you, and also upon being united in marriage to a most excellent lady ; for such I feel assured she is, from her being approved both by your father and yourself. I will not sing your epithalamium in return for your epicedium : but I both hope and wish that she may prove such a wife to you as Gregory of Nazianzum the son tells us that his mother was to Nazianzene his father ; not only a helpmate, but as it were a guide, a mistress in godliness, both by her words and actions urging him on to the best pursuits. Master Caius, the very dear friend of us both, a young man of remarkable piety and learning, has left the university to feed a flock committed to his charge, about forty miles from this city. It happened, however, most opportunely, that on the even- ing of that very day in which the copy of your verses was sent me to be forwarded to him, he came to Oxford ; but as he was obliged to go away early the next morning, he asked and obtained of me that I would both thank and salute you in his name ; both whicli I now do. Our fellows too, whom you desired master pre- sident to salute, wish you every happiness in return. ^May the great and good God ever enlighten with his light, protect with his favour, and guide by his Spirit both yourself and your father, and [3 This was a copy of verses, on the death of Parkhurst. They are still preserved at Zurich.] 502 J. RAINOLDS TO R. GUALTER. [lET. all your friends, and the whole church of Zurich ! Farewell, Dated from Corpus Christi College at Oxford, August 13th, 1576. Yours in Christ Jesus, John Kainolds. CCXVII. R. GUALTER TO ARCHBISHOP GRINDAL. [B. 110.] Zurich, Aug. 24, 1576. I SUPPOSE, most reverend father in Christ, that the letter wliich I wrote to your eminence in the month of March, by Laurence Bodley, has long since been delivered to you. Although nothing worthy of mention has taken place in Germany since that time, yet the Lutherans are still carrying on, with great zeal and contention, their purpose, about which I then wrote ; with the view, namely, of oppressing us and our churches. And they would doubt- less have made some progress by this time, had not the affairs of Poland^ given some trouble to the emperor, of whose favour and concurrence they stand in need. He has appointed a conference at Ratisbon, and went thither in person about two months since ; but he is sitting there almost alone, and waiting for the other princes. In the mean time some of them met together in Saxony, at the palace of the elector Augustus, to whom went also the elector of Bavaria to the astonishment of many ; as he has hitherto been the most bitter enemy of evangehcal doctrine. Those, however, of the more judicious sort suspect that they arc forming some designs against the elector Palatine, which cannot be brought to pass with- out the concurrence of the Bavarian, since the princes of Bavaria and of the Palatinate are of the same descent and origin^. The visit of the emperor to Lewis, the son of the elector Palatine', \} The duke of Anjou, having quitted Poland to ascend the throne of Prance, on the death of Charles IX. was deprived of his royal dignity in the former country, and the throne declared vacant, on July 15, 1575. The emperor Maximilian in vain endeavom'ed to succeed ; for the crown was be- stowed on Stephen Batori, prince of Transylvania, on INIay 1, 1576.] [2 Lewis II. duke of Bavaria married Mathilda, daughter of the em- peror Rodolph I., by whom he had two sons, namely, Rodolph, from whom were descended the counts Palatine of the Rhine, and Lewis, the head of the house of Bavaria.] [3 Frederic III. in the year 15(50, removed from their pastoral functions the Lutheran doctors, and filled their places with Calvinists, and at the same time obliged his subjects to embrace the tenets, rites, and institutions of the chm-ch of Geneva, This order was abrogated in 1576, by his son and suc- cessor Lewis, who restored Lutheranism to its former credit and authority. Mosheim, Cent. xvi. ii. Chap. 2.] CCXVIl.] R. GUALTER TO ARCHBISHOP GRINDAL. 50^, who is in command at Hamburgh, and who has hitherto openly dis- agreed with his father in the sacramcntarian controversy, is p.lso an object of suspicion with many parties. Some are afraid lest he too should come to an understanding with the enemy, with the view of succeeding his father in case of his being dethroned or banished. Certain it is, that Augustus* is most hostile to us, and fresh ex- amples of cruelty are every day exhibited by him against those whom he discovers to be of our sentiments. James Andreae^ an ambitious and abusive man, is supplying torches to this flame ; and since he has nothing to reply to our Heidelberg brethren and ourselves, is endeavouring to overwhelm us by the authority and power of princes. What therefore I lately recommended for the defence of our common cause, seems not more useful than it is necessary ; namely, that her most serene majesty should interpose her au- thority. For the elector Palatine has long been an object of their hatred, and they are aware that he is not reverenced and honoured even by all his own subjects as he ought to be. The Swiss possess no influence whatever with the princes. As to Geneva, they not only hate but execrate it. But they cannot thus despise or disregard the most serene queen of England, who possesses weight both on the ground of her royal majesty and of her great resources ; and who, in fine, is in a position to afford valuable assistance to the whole of Germany against their common enemies the papists. She will there- fore truly perform the part of a pious nursing mother of the church, if she will consider this business : nor will there be wanting reasons for drawing the king of Scotland into co-operation with her, the accession of whom may be of great advantage to the cause in hand. But I understand that the Scottish churches are on the most friendly terms with us, and I think they would be wanting in no service which ought to be required from christian men. Cer- tainly some persons'' of piety and reputation among them have advised me to dedicate my [commentary on the] Galatians (of which, most reverend ftithcr, I send you a copy) to the king of Scotland. I have thought right again to treat upon these matters, that you may perceive that an opportunity is still afforded you of doing a service to the churcli at large ; and this opportunity is [^ Namely, the Elector of Saxony. See above, Letter CCVIII. p. 486, n. 2.] P See above, p. 180, n. 2.] [6 One of these persons was probably Buchanan. The next letter in the series at Zurich is one from Gualter to him, begging him to present the book here mentioned to the king of Scotland. He alhules also to the harmony between the two churches, the Scots having subscribed to the Helvetic con- fession set forth in 156G.] 504 R. GUALTEK TO ARCHBISHOP GRINDAL. [lET. more plausible, because I scarcely think the emperor will rashly ahenate the affections of any parties from him at this time, when he has need of numerous friends and alhes, unless he is inchned to give up all hopes of the kingdom of Poland ^ and expose his Huno-ary to danger likewise. And the peace with France will add no little importance to this cause ; for although the opinions and hopes of all parties respecting it are not the same, it is certain, notwithstanding, that the counsels of the common enemy are much confounded by the promulgation of it. I pray your eminence, most reverend father, to read these things and bear them with patience. For the pubUc duty which I owe to the church, and which I doubt not you have greatly at heart, induces me to write them. May the Lord Almighty preserve you, and bless your most godly en- deavours! My friend Juhus Santerentianus, who desires to be commended to your eminence, heartily unites in the same prayer. Farewell. Zurich, Aug. 24, 1576. Your eminence's most devoted, Eodolph Gualter. CCXVIII. LEWIN2 TO J. STURMIUS. [B. 111.] [London,] Aug. 25, [1576.] When the letters which you had written to the queen, the lord treasurer, and sir F. Walsingham, were first brought to me, as there was wanting a copy of your letter to the queen, and the matter on which you wrote was itself uncertain, I thought it better to suppress those letters, and to write to you upon the same subject, if it seemed good, more certainly and decidedly, shortly after. But when your other letter was brought to me on the day following, which you had written long before, and in which was inclosed the letter sent you by Lanscade ; since I had also received instructions upon this subject, and had recommended you to forward any such letter that might be sent to you ; I adopted a new plan, to carry all your letters to the lord treasurer, and make use of his advice, either to present your letters written to the queen and sir F. Wal- singham, or to suppress them. I can scarcely describe to you how much the lord treasurer was gratified with this mark of respect, from you in the first place, [1 See above, p. 502, n. 1.] [2 Strype mentions a Dr William Lewin, who was judge of the court of faculties.] CCXVIII.] LEWIN TO J. STUBMIUS. 505 and then also from me : I shall only state, that he both read your letter, and admitted me into his private cabinet with the greatest courtesy. He recommended that your letter, and that also of Lanscade, should be delivered to sir F. Walsingham. But he did not advise the letter to be sent to the queen, both because the copy was wanting, and because the subject was still in uncertainty. And he recommended me to state this to sir F. Walsingham. I have therefore stated these things to sir F. Walsingham, and have given him your letter, and also that of Lanscade ; besides also the letter to the queen, which however I do not think that he has pre- sented. But that I might ascertain the fact, the lord treasurer advised me to meet them both in London on the day following. When I was on my way back, and had almost reached the city, lo I I, who was before somewhat weak both in my eye-sight and the rest of my body, was seized on the journey by a tertian fever, under which I laboured for twelve days, so that I could neither wait upon the lord treasurer, nor upon sir F. Walsingham. But I hope that both of them have written to you by their merchants, as they promised me they would do. While I was still labouring under the attack of fever, I sent your letter to the archbishop for his perusal ; and at the same time requested him to advance your pecuniary matter^ with our nobility as far as he could: respecting which also I had much conversation with the lord treasurer, and a few words also with sir F. Walsing- ham, in the queen's palace ; for the time would not allow me to say much. But I would have you know how much you are in- debted to the lord archbishop ; for he has so managed your cause during my illness, and still continues to manage it, that I hope that you will certainly recover your money before many months. But you must feel anxious to know by what means this can be effected. You must know then that our people have decided upon sending a new ambassador into France, a most discreet, brave, and noble personage \ The lord archbishop has been diUgently urging him personally to undertake your cause. He has also requested the lord treasurer and sir F. Walsingham to recommend it to liim ; that it may be treated, not as that of a stranger, but a citizen ; not as that of a private individual, but of an Enghsh ambassador, and one too who is most learned, most godly, and who deserves well both of ourselves, and of the French who profess the [pro- tcstant] religion. If we can get the business carried on in the queen's name, we shall seem to have gained every thing. I doubt [3 Sco below, Letter CCXIX. note 2.] [■* Sir Amias Paulet.J 506 LEWIN TO J. STURMIUS. [lET.» not but that he will so commend the case to [the duke] d'Alen9on,, as to tell him that it will gratify the queen if he will take care that you are paid as soon as possible. I am unable, nor is it per- mitted me, to give you every reason you have to hope that you will by these means be relieved from debt. I only tell you this, that the archbishop was exceedingly delighted at the thought of the happiness it would occasion you, when all the money should be paid to the last penny ; which, my father and my master, most accom- plished Sturmius, I pray Almighty God may very speedily be the case. But you must know that no offices or exertions of mine shall be Avanting, or indeed, have been wanting, to this object; on> account of which, when I was in a weak state of health, I under- took a long journey, and fell into a fever in consequence. But I would have you know that I am now well again, and am diligently employed on this same business of yours. I have not yet received your autumnal pension \ as it is neither due nor payable by the treasury before Michaelmas. I have how- ever made arrangements with Santrinus, and given him authority to pay it you at this Frankfort fair. You will therefore expect and demand from Bernus as much as he paid you before ; for our friend Santrinus has promised to manage this. But I wish to know how many florins Bernus paid you, that I may ascertain whether I. can transmit you the money in any way more conveniently through another merchant. I have written this by starts and in a hurry, as you may guess from the writing itself. Do you take care that nothing which is written or recorded by the historians be wanting in your commen- taries on Demosthenes and Cicero. Farewell, Aug. 25. See also that you thank the archbishop for having been so prompt and ready to reUeve you from debt. Yours, you know who, from the subject of this letter, [Lewin.] CCXIX. LEWIN TO J. STURMIUS. [B.118.] [London], Sept. !!, [157(i.] I WROTE you word a few days since, most accomplished Stur- mius, with what design and by what motives I was especially induced, after that Lanscade"'s letter had been sent to me by you, \} Namely, the salary which tSturmius received in his character of agent to queen Elizabeth at Strasburgh. See above, Letter CLXX. p. 412.] CCXIX.] LEWIN TO J. STURMIUS. S07 to carry to court, together Avith that letter, those others written to the queen and the lord treasurer, and [sir Francis] AValsinghara ; also, how gratifying they botji were to both those noblemen, and for what reasons I thought that the third letter addressed to the queen had not been delivered to her. I wrote at the same time, and that at some length, respecting your pecuniary and French^ affairs ; especially about our primate, the archbishop of Canterbury, who is indeed most anxious for your welfare and interests; and also the method he devised both of relieving you from this debt, and restoring you to your former tranquiUity and ease, whereby you may pass the remainder of your life with the gentle muses. From that time you must know that the lord archbishop has used his utmost exertions in your behalf ; that he has pleaded your cause with prudence, diligence, and friendly regard. For besides having again and again commended yourself and your affairs to sir Amias Paulet, a most noble-minded and valiant man, to whom a new embassy to France is entrusted, he also treated thenceforward separately, first with the lord treasurer, and afterwards with sir Francis Walsingham, that they might render this same Paulet for many reasons more interested in yourself and your fortunes. And the sum of this recommendation was, that those two noblemen, who possess the greatest influence and authority among us, should request and entreat Paulet to arrange your French business with [2 Sturmius, out of zeal for religion, and compassion to the state of the professors of it in France, about the year 1562, had not only lent considerable sums of money himself of his own, but took up more at interest of the mer- chants of that place [Strasbm-gh] for the supply of the prince of Conde and Coligny the admiral of France ; at what time also the queen herself lent them men and money. Stm'mius was now pressed with this debt : and sir Amias Paulet being now, in September, going in an ambassago towards France, the archbishop took this opportunity to intercede with the lord treasm-er ; shewing him " how he [the archbishop] was moved as well with the old years, as also with the singularity and excellency of the man, earn- estly to desire his lordship to recommend his case unto sir Amias. That whereas some order had been proposed by the present prince of Conde for the satisfaction of the said Mr Sturmius, by assisting him in obtaining a. certain quantity of salt in Languedoc or Provence, in lieu of the said money, by sir Amias's good means unto the duke of Alen9on and the said prince, that purpose might take effect, or some other order be devised for his reUef. So as thereby ho niight take some comfort and pleasure of his life, now in his old years; and with more (juietness finish many good works, which ho [the archbishop] knew had been purposed and begun by him." Strype, Grindal, p. 322.] . ^.. -X 508 LliWlN TO J. STURMIUS. [ LET. the duke d'Alen^on and the prince of Conde, either in the queen's name, or at least pubUckly in that of our nobles ; which they both of them, moved in part by his authority, and partly too by the circumstances of your case, positively promised to do. And I have no doubt myself, nor, my Sturmius, would I have you to doubt, that they have already done as they were requested to do. Paulet, having taken leave of the queen six days since, is pre- paring for his journey to France, and will very shortly set out. He is a man of great talents and of a powerful and lofty mind. I perceive that you inquire respecting the earl of Oxford, whether he also did not recommend your case to Paulet. But you must know that I dihgently interested myself with the earl, who replied, that he would not only recommend his friend Sturmius to Paulet, but would also request the earl of Leicester to recommend him in every possible way. He added also, that unless you are relieved from France, he will take care that assistance shall be obtained for you in England : lastly, that he had a most high opinion of you, and had made most honourable mention of you : which things afforded me the greatest pleasure when I heard them, and certainly ought to delight you on being informed of them. But do you, as an old man, both make much of our archbishop, who is also advanced in years, and who is so firm and stedfast in friendship ; and do not disparage this young earl, who has so favourable an opinion of you : from both I dare hope every thing, while from the one I dare promise every thing. But now, my Sturmius, you will perhaps expect me to state what I advise or recommend to yourself. First of all, you should write as soon as possible to sir Amias Paulet, knight, and who will be our ambassador in France before this letter reaches you. You may state what you have heard from me from England, especially respecting the good-will and interest on your behalf manifested by the lord archbishop ; and you may, if you please, add that of the lord treasurer and sir Francis Walsingham. I hope also that the earls of Leicester and Oxford will commend you to Paulet, but this is not yet ascertained by me : I heard from the earl of Oxford that they would do so, but do not yet understand that they have done it. Perhaps also it might be desirable, that if you have any faith- ful and trustworthy friend in France, you would send him to Paulet with your letter, that he may sometimes put him in mind of you, and write you word back from France, what is doing, and what is to be done on your part. But if you have not at this time such a friend in France, nor can procure one to go thither at his own CCXIX.] LEWIN TO J. STURMIUS. 509 expense, I dare not recommend you to send any one at yours. For it is not, perhaps, the part of a prudent man, -who is already in debt, to involve himself yet more deeply. I hope that your letters, if you frequently send them to Paulet, as both giving an account of the affairs of Germany, and also full of your zeal and service, will prove sufficiently diligent remembrancers to him, who is natu- rally a worthy man, and is much beholden to the noblemen who have recommended you to him, and will certainly endeavour to shew himself grateful to them, and kind and liberal to yourself. This one thing must not be omitted, namely, that you inform Paulet, as soon as possible, of the amount that is owing to you, both in re- spect to the money you borrowed, and in respect to the interest which you paid the merchants on that account. I drew up from your letters a short statement of the whole debt you have incurred, and stated all the circumstances which might interest our nobles in your behalf; but the lord archbishop, with the greatest discretion, erased whatever might offend the French in case they should see it. One copy of this was delivered to the lord treasurer, another to sir F. Walsingham, and I doubt not but that Paulet has seen both. The lord archbishop retains the third, for the purpose of making other noblemen acquainted with your case ; and that you may per- ceive yourself how the matter has been stated by me, and make any addition that may be requisite, I send you a fourth copy of this statement, and that just as it was interlined and corrected by the archbishop. I will omit nothing that I may think conducive to your interests ; and if anything occurs to you, take care to let me know. There is one thing that I am thinking of, and that is, to induce one of Paulet's domestics, who has some respectable situation in his household, to interest himself in your affairs, and remind his master of you, when occasion arises ; and lastly, to write me word when there is anything further to be done here. My father and master, I will neglect no duty of a dear brother, since indeed you regard me in that light. My ability is but little, but I devote myself to you as far as I am able. Bernus will pay your autumnal pension at this Frankfort fair. Santrinus, an Eng- lish merchant, whom I have made use of before, also promised to do this a fortnight since, respecting which I also wrote to you in my last letter. Farewell, Sept. 8. Yours, Lem^in. The archbishop requested rac to salute you in this letter in his name. I am still suffering from Aveakness in my eyes, which makes me use the luandwriting of another. Once more farewell. 510 SIR F. WALSINGHAM TO J. STURMIUS. [lET^ CCXX. SIR F. AFALSINGHAM TO J. STURMIUS. [B. 115.] London, April 23, 1577. Most learned Sturmius, I am obliged to reply to your many letters by a single one of mine : not but that I could wish, as it is right I should, to return you letter for letter ; but I am prevented doing so by reason of my want of time, and the state of my health, which has now for some months past been very unfavourable. But I would have you assured that your letters were most gratifying, not only to myself and your other friends, who love you as they are wont to do, but also to her royal majesty, who ascribes as much to her friend Sturmius, as your virtue justly claims to itself by its own merits. Tliis only thing is wanting in you, that you write more at length and more fully respecting the state of the times and the dispositions of men ; and this the rather, in pro- portion as the times in which we live are abounding in dangers, and the dispositions of the men with whom we have to contend, are not without their infinite recesses and deep concealments : which never- theless betray themselves I know not how, and are laid open for our good, in proportion as they are more dihgently observed, and as we consider the new alliances which they are making every day. Your Germany has many sovereigns, whose friendship and alliance is courted by foreigners, who desire to gratify themselves rather than you : and to which party every one of them seems inclined, and what encouragement they aiford either to the favourers of religion or the opposers of it, is neither without its use to know, nor will it be unwelcome for you to inform us. Send us word especially, what opinion you think we should entertain .of the emperor, of the Palatine^ of the Rhine, and Casimir: whether they will unitedly continue in that regard and good-will, which their pious and noble parent recommended to them on his death-bed, to the advancement of the gospel and of the general peace ; or whether by their dis- sensions and domestic quarrels they will occasion destruction both to themselves and their people. There will not perhaps be want- ing those who will leave no stone unturned to cast this torch into that illustrious house of the Palatines, and set it on fire ; and for this reason we must guard against them with the greater diligence. If you will write upon these matters, and inform us whether any thing of the kind is to be suspected, and by what ways and means [1 Louis VI. ami John Casimir were sons of the Elector Palatine Frederic III., who diiMl Oct. 8, 1576.] JCCXX.] SIR F. WALSINGHAM TO J. STURMIUS. 511 it may be guarded against, you will do a most welcome service both to ourselves and to the whole christian world. Farewell and happily. From my house at London, April 23, 1577. Your most attached, Francis Walsingham. CCXXI. SIR P. SIDNEY TO H. LANGUET^. [B. 117.] Court, Oct. 1, 1577- My very dear Languet, of your three letters which, in that written on the 24th of August, you affirm that you have sent me, I have only received two. Those indeed were full of all kindness and real friendship ; but this is nothing new. Do you fancy that you can by this means perform the promise that you so solemnly made about your paying me a visit? That would be indeed, master Hubert, a downright imposition. I am very glad that you are so near Spires, where you may be properly dealt with. There was a nobleman here a short time since, of the name of de Tamars, with whom I formed an acquaintance, and this the more readily, because he very frequently in my presence made hon- ourable mention of you. So likewise Aldegonde^ and the prince himself, when I was staying with his highness, often said a great deal by which I perceived that you were very dear to him. But why do I tell you these things ? Plainly to persuade you to visit him, if you can do so with safety, and to come from thence to us. You will there have a most excellent field for putting into practice, in the formation of this new commonwealth, those principles which you have so diligently studied during the whole course of your life. And I hope indeed, that I shall come over thither, before many weeks have elapsed ; for I have a great regard for that prince, and have [2 Hubert Languet had been minister of state to Augustus, elector of Saxony, from Avhose service he retired in consequence of the controversy between the Lutherans and ZuingHans about the eucharist, on his taking part with the latter. He afterwards accepted an invitation to Antwerp from the prince of Orange. He was the intimate friend of Melancthon, Thuanus, and Du Plessis, by the last of whom his character is thus described : " Is fuit quales multi videri volunt ; is vixit qualiter optimi mori cupiunt." He died at Antwerp, Sept. 20, 1581. His correspondence with Sir P. Sidney has been lately translated by the Rev. Steuart A. Pears.] [3 Philip de Mamix, lord of Mont St Aldegonde, was the personal friend and adviser of William, prince of Orange, and in 1575 was one of the deputies sent by the States to desire the protection of queen Elizabeth. He was en- gaged in a Dutch version of the scriptures, when he died, in 1598. See Moreri, Bayle, Melchior Adam.] 512 SIR p. SIDNEY TO H. LANGUET. [lET. perhaps in some way been of more service to him than he is aware of. The leaning of our minds is such at this present time, that (should the wars be continued in Flanders) I am in some hope that the prediction, which you formerly uttered respecting me at Vienna, Avill have a happy fulfilment. The marquis d'Havre' demands assistance, and I think, if occasion so require, he will obtain it". The peace with France in some measure disturbs our queen ; for she thinks she has not been properly treated. You know the reason. For my own part I consider these things as of little importance ; for they will always have both a reason and a disposition to make a rupture, provided only they see any certain ground on which to rest. I wrote to you a year ago about a certain Frobisher^, who, in rivalry of Magellan, has explored that sea which he supposes to wash the north part of America. It is a marvellous history. After having made slow progress in the past year, so as only to pass in the autumn the Feroe isles and an island which he supposes to be Friesland\ discovered by the Venetian Zeni^, he touched at a certain island for the purpose of recruiting both himself and his crew. And there by chance a young man, one of the ship's com- pany, picked up a piece of earth'' which he saw glittering on the [1 This was Charles PhiHp de Croy, a younger brother of the duke d'Arschot, who was at this time, 1577, commanding a part of the troops of the States at or near Antwerp.] [2 The marquis d'Havre and Adolph Metherk were sent over by the States to borrow of queen Elizabeth a hundred thousand pounds sterUng for eight months. Wright's Queen Elizabeth and her Times, ii. 70. See also Camden, Elizabeth, p. 221.] [3 Sir Martin Frobisher left Blackwall on his first voyage in June 1576, under the patronage of Ambrose Dudley, earl of Warwick, and arrived at Harwich on his return, Oct. 2. See Hakluyt, in. 29, 57.] [4 "The 11th day (July) at a S.E. sun, we had sight of the land of Fries- land bearing from us W.N.W. sixteen leagues, and rising like pinnacles of steeples, and all covered with snow. I found myself in 61 degrees of lati- tude." Hakluyt, as above. This is however now generally supposed to be Cape Farewell, in the south of Greenland.] [5 Nicholas and Antony Zeni professed to discover this country in the 14th century, being driven thither from Ireland by a tempest.] [6 " One brought a piece of black stone much like to a sea-coal in colour, which by the weight seemed to be some kind of metal or mineral. This was a thing of no account in the judgment of the captain at first sight, and yet for novelty it was kept in respect of the place from whence it came. After bis arrival in London, being demanded of sundry of his friends what thing he had brought them home out of that country, he had nothing left to pre- CCXXI.] SIR P. SIDNEY TO H. LANGUET. 513 ground, and shewed it to Frobisher ; who, being engaged in other matters, and not believing that the precious metals were produced in a region so far to the north, considered it of no value. But he returned home at the beginning of winter. The young man kept the earth by him, as a memorial of his labour, (for he had no thought of any thing else,) till his return to London: and there, when one of the friends of the young man perceived it shining in an extraordinary manner, he made an assay, and found that it was the purest gold, and without any intermbcture of other metal. Where- fore Frobisher" went back to the place this last spring, under orders to explore that island®, and, should it answer his expectation, to proceed no farther. This he has done, and has now returned, bringing his ships, of which he had only three% and those of small size, full laden; and he is said (for they have not yet unloaded) to have brought two hundred tons of ore. He has given it as his decided opinion, that the island is so productive in metals, as to seem very far to surpass the country of Peru, at least as it now is. There are also six other islands ^° near to this, which seem very little inferior. It is therefore at this time under debate, by what means these our hitherto successful labours can be still carried on in safety against the attacks of other nations, among whom the Spaniards and Danes seem especially to bo considered ; the former, as claiming all the western parts by right from the pope ; the latter, as being more northerly and therefore nearer ; and relying on their pos- session of Iceland, they are better provided with the means of undertaking this voyage. They are also said to be sufficiently skilled sent them withal, but a piece of this black stone. And it fortuned a gentle- woman, one of the adventurers' wives, to have a piece thereof, which by chance she threw and burned in the fire, so long, that at the length being taken forth, and quenched in a little vinegar, it glittered with a bright mar- casite of gold. Whereupon the matter being called in some question, it was brought to certain gold-finers in London to make an assay thereof, who gave out that it held gold, and that very richly for the quantity." Hakluyt, as above.] [7 Frobisher left Blackwall on his second voyage, on Whitsunday, May 26, 1577, and returned to England on the 28th of September.] [8 This was an island bearing the name of Hall, whence the ore was taken up, which was brought into England this last year, 1576 ; the said Hall being present at the finding and taking uj) thereof, who was then master in the Gabriel with Capt. Frobisher. Hakluyt.] ['J Namely, the Aide, of two hundred tons, the Gabriel, and the Michael, of about thirty tons each.] [10 Viz. in the neighbourhood of Frobishcr's Straits.] 33 514 SIR 1'. SIDNEY TO H. LANGUET. [lET.. in the art of navigation, I wish, therefore, for the sake of our mutual friendship, that you would send me your opinion upon this subject, and at the same time describe the most convenient method of working those ores. You promised that you would send me the laws of Guttenberg\ I pray you to do this as soon as possible. Some light may possibly be obtained from them ; for we understand this art httle better than we do the cultivation of vines. Remem- ber therefore so to write, as that you may answer to the great reputation you enjoy among us ; for, unless you forbid it, I will shew your letter to the queen. The thing is truly of great im- portance, and one which may probably, some time or other, be of use to the professors of the true rehgion. I have written to you three times on that important affair^ of mine; so that I think you are satisfied on that score. I pray you to write to me with all diligence, and I shall per- haps shake off my slothfulness. Send your letter to my friend Freming. For de Taxis ^ has too much worked his swift horses. I am truly sorry for that man's misfortune. My friend Beale* is now, I beheve, sweetly renewing in your society the advantages of ancient friendship. I love him, and yet I envy him. Our friend Lubetius has been conferring with me about the money which the king of France owes to the free cities of Germany. Here truly I perceive the council are much incUned to oblige the German cities. But, as you know, you Frenchmen have for a long time owed us the whole of Aquitame and Normandy, but you would sooner make yourselves bankrupts, than discharge the debt; and yet we esteem such debtors very httle, and such bad farmers [of the revenue] far less. I beg you will write me word as to what is the state of your affairs. You very much wrong me, if you are not fully persuaded of my entire readiness to serve you by every means in my power. And you must not charge upon me the saying, " out of sight, out [1 Guttenbei'g was a town, in Bohemia, in the neighbourhood of which there were certain silver mines ; and the laws here mentioned seem to refer to the municii^al code which regulated the working of them.] [2 This appears to be some affah* unknown to the biographers of Sh* Philip Sidney. Languet often refers to this magnum iwgotkim, but without giving a hint of its nature.] [3 Languet says in a letter to Sir Philip Sidney, in 1575, "Consulo ut scribas ad Joaun. Baptistam de Taxis, qui stationariorum equorum pi'ocura- tionem habet in Belgio."] [4 Robert Beale was clerk of the council, and often employed in private missions to the protestant princes of Germany, an account of which, written by himself to the lord treasurer, is given in Strype, Ann. iv. 117.] CCXXI.] SIR P. SIDNEY TO H. LANGUET. 515 of mind : " for I have never felt any diminution of that ardent affection with which I have always regarded you ; but it has rather increased from day to day, and it is when absent, that I have most of all felt the sweetness of your society. But observe what Aristotle says of old men in his Rhetoric; namely, that they are cold in love, and that we are deceiving our own spirits in cultivating friendships, as if they were notliing else but the smoke of youth- ful ardour. But who, I pray, will now dare to accuse me of laziness, seeing that I have wintten so long a letter ? See that you write me one yet longer in retm^n ; for you will have a month at least to do it in. Farewell, and commend me to the worthy Bain^, our friend Lubetius, Clusius, the excellent Jordan, and my Andrew^. And so offer my services to Butrech, the best doctor among reisters''', and the best reister among doctors, (as, if I mistake not, Cicero says of Scaevola and Crassus®,) as the services of one who loves them all, and desires to gratify and be of use to every one of them. Again, my Hubert, farewell. From the queen's palace, Oct. 1, 1577. Your most loving, Philip Sidney. I wonder that I have not of a long time heard any thing of Wacker. Henry, baron of Lichtenstein, was here shortly after my return from Germany, to whom I did not shew so much courtesy as I ought to have done, having been at that time so much involved in business ; and by reason of the absence of my father and uncles, who were then at Bath, I was not prepared to receive him as I could have wished. I pray you therefore, when an opportunity occurs, to make my excuse. He is certainly an excellent young man, and one whom I love from my heart ; and whenever any of his friends shall come hither, I will endeavour to atone for my fault. My cousin Greville' dutifully salutes you. [5 Bain. This seems a familiar abbreviation of Banosius, often named by Languet in his letters.] [6 The name of this person was Andreas Paulus. He is often mentioned by Languet.] [7 Languet, in one of liis letters, calls the same person "doctor equestris." He appears, from a "letter of news," MS. Cotton. Galba, c. 254, to have been in the suite of prince Casimir. Reister is an old word for a trooper. Daniel Rogers writing from Enchusen, July 26, 1577, to the carl of Leicester, speaks of Don John "making a levy of reisters. " Wright's Elizabeth, ir. 60.] [s An allusion to Cic. de Oratore, l. 39. Juris peritorum eloqueiitissimus, eloquentium juris pcritissimas. See also ibid. 50.] [9 Fulkc Grevillc, Lord Brooke.] 33—2 516 R. GU ALTER TO G. BUCHANAN. [leT. CCXXII. R. GUALTER TO G. BUCHANAN. [B. 118.] Zurich, about Dec. 22, 1577. When ray homilies upon the epistle of St Paul to the Galatians, dedicated to the most serene king of Scotland, were pubhshed last year, I wrote to you, most excellent and honoured sir, on the 31st of August, and sent two copies of that book, one of which I re- quested you to present to the king's majesty in my name, and to keep the other for yourself as a mark of my aifection and respect. But from that time I have received no inteUigence either from Eng- land or Scotland, as to what has been done with the books. The London merchant, to whom our printer [Froschover] had entrusted the parcel, told him that it had been duly and safely forwarded to you. But of this I am rather inclined to doubt, partly from your so long silence, and partly from his covetousness, which I have dis- covered in many other instances, and which renders the man careless in the execution of such commissions as he perceives to be unattended with any advantage to himself. And the noble youth the lord George Keith, the son of the earl Marischal of Scotland, has increased my suspicion ; for he also thinks that there has oc- curred something of the kind, knowing as he does your great facility and eagerness in cultivating the friendsliip of worthy men. When, therefore, he wrote to me in the month of August respecting the foul murder of his brother WilUam ^, and requested my services in honouring liis memory and his death, and moreover very kindly offered his assistance in taking charge of my letters ; I thought that so desirable an opportunity was on no account to be neglected, and paid such a tribute to his brother's memory as I was able to do in the midst of the occupations and weighty affairs which call me away from the study of poetry, in which I formerly so much delighted ; and at the same time I have sent this letter to be for- warded to him at Lausanne, that he may send it you from thence together with his own : and I entreat you, most learned Buchanan, to receive it in such sort as you are wont to receive the services of one by whom you are so greatly esteemed ; and relieve me, I pray you, from my present anxiety, by letting me know whether ray homilies have come to your hands, and how they have been re- \} William Keith, son of lord William Keith and brother of George, carl Marischal, was unfortunately killed in an excursion into the country, while prosecuting his studies at Geneva. Beza, Gualter, and other learned men honoured his memory with eulogies. M'Crie's Life of Mclvill, 1819. Vol. i. p. 428.] CCXXII.] R. GUALTER TO G. KUCHANAN. 5l7 ceived by the king's majesty. This I solemnly declare to you, that I have no other object in my lucubrations than to benefit the church : which object if I can in any measure attain unto, I shall not repent of any labour or inconvenience. Farewell, most excel- lent and much honoured sir. Zurich, on the day of the winter solstice, in the year of Christ's birth 1577. Your excellency's most attached, RODOLPH GuALTER. CCXXIII. SIR P. SIDNEY TO H. LANGUET. [B. 119.] [Coukt], March 1, 1578. My very dear Hubert ! Robert Beale^ and Rogers ^ and your friend Butrech, arrived here together, with your most wished for letters ; so that I seemed to myself both to hear and see you at the same time to my exceeding delight. You sharply accuse me of slothfulness, and in the meantime fall into the same fault, nay, a far greater, inasmuch as I am always made better by your letters, while mine must of necessity grate upon your ears to no purpose. And the use of the pen, as you may perceive, has plainly fallen from me ; and my mind itself, if it was ever active in any thing, is now beginning, by reason of my indolent ease, imperceptibly to lose its strength, and to relax without any reluctance. For to what purpose should our thoughts be directed to various kinds of know- ledge, unless room be afforded for putting it into practice, so that pubhc advantage may be the result, which in a corrupt age we cannot hope for ? Who would learn music except for the sake of giving pleasure ? or architecture except with a view to building ? But the mind itself, you will say, that particle of the divine mind, is cultivated in this manner. This indeed, if we allow it to be the case, is a very great advantage : but let us see whether we are not giving a beautiful, but false appearance to our splendid errors. For while the mind is thus, as it were, drawn out of itself, it cannot turn its powers inward for thorough self-examination ; to which em- [2 See above, p. 514, n. 4.] [3 Namely, Daniel Rogers, the son of John Rogers, the protomartyr in queen Mary's reign. He is said by the writer of the Athense Oxonienses to have been " the most accomplished gentleman of that time, and a very good man, and excellently learned." He was sent to the prince of Orange in the year 1575, when the queen had declined to assist him and the Netherlands against the violence of Spain. See Strype, Ann. m. i. 392, 394.] 518 SIR p. SIDNEY TO 11. LANGUET. [ LET. ployment no labour that men can undertake, is any way to be com- pared. Do you not see that I am cleverly playing the stoic ? yea, and I shall be a cynic too, unless you reclaim me. Wherefore, if you please, prepare yourself to attack me : I have now pointed out the field of battle, and I openly declare war against you. But I wonder, my very dear Hubert, what has come into your mind, that, when I have not as yet done any thing worthy of me, you would have me bound in the chains of matrimony ; and yet without pointing out any individual lady, but rather seeming to extol the state itself, which however you have not as yet sanctioned by your own example. Respecting her^, of whom I readily ac- knowledge how unworthy I am, I have written you my reasons long since, briefly indeed, but yet as well as I was able. At this present time, indeed, I beheve you have entertained some other notion ; wliich I earnestly entreat you to acquaint me with, whatever it may be : for every thing that comes from you has great weight with me ; and, to speak candidly, I am in some measure doubting whe- ther some one, more suspicious than wise, has not whispered to you something unfavourable concerning me, which, though you did not give entire credit to it, you nevertheless prudently, and as a friend, thought right to suggest for my consideration. Should this have been the case, 1 entreat you to state the matter to me in plain terms, that I may be able to acquit myself before you, of whose good opinion I am most desirous : and should it only prove to have been a joke, or a piece of friendly advice, I pray you nevertheless to let me know ; since every thing from you will always be no less acceptable to me, than the things that I hold most dear. There is no news here, except that it is a novel and almost imheard of circumstance in government, that nothing novel has occurred. Frobisher's gold is now melted, and does not turn out so valuable as he at first boasted : however these islands at the sixty second degree are not to be despised; but they keep this as a great secret, lest, as you know, the opportunity be fore- stalled. Nay more, they expect to be able to cross the sea at the same latitude ; so incorrect is the description of the world as given by cosmographers : but if there should be open sea at such a tem- perature, you perceive it will be of great importance. I believe the queen will do what you wrote to me about for the sake of prince Casimir ; but I was loth at this present time to say much upon that subject, as I know that it is our disposition [1 Lady Penelope Devereux, of whom Sidney was an admirer, may pro- bably be alluded to.] CCXXIII.] SIR P. SIDNEY TO H. LANGUET. 519 not to do any thing in a hurry. What else can I now write to you, when I am so very sleepy, except that I love you as my own heart, and that I desire nothing more earnestly than that I may sometime be able to prove it ? My friend Greville salutes you. Humbly salute in my name the count and countess of Hanau, and write me word how they Hke the dogs I sent them. I have now written to Lubetius, Banosius, Andrew, Anselm, Merell. Am I then lazy? I pray you to salute Clusius, and tell master Sal- vart^ that I am greatly indebted to him for the book he sent me translated into French. When it was put into my hands, I was exceedingly busy ; but I will sometime shew myself deserving of his courtesy. Salute also master Glauburg, whom' I will wil- hngly oblige. Farewell, dearest Languet. March 1, 1578. Yours, Philip Sidney. I will shew Beale every friendly office in my power, both for his own deservings, and especially for your recommendation of him. CCXXIV. L. HUMPHREY TO R. GUALTER. [A. 131.] Oxford, Aug. 11, 157^5. Immanuel. I recognise in your letter, most learned Gualter, express manifestations of your wonted kindness and discretion. For I regard it as a proof of the greatest kindness, united to peculiar condescension, that you were inclined to address one who had been so long silent, and almost ungrateful. But though I have written too seldom, you must not attribute it either to ingratitude or forgetfulness in me, who am frequently recalling to mind, and who, God permitting, will cherish in my memory as long as I live, the favours which you so often and so largely conferred on myself and on my brother exiles. But now that I am challenged to write, I will seize upon every occasion and opportunity [of doing so], and will never allow a messenger to go from hence to you without a little note from myself. For in truth I had rather seem unpolished and extemporaneous, than regardless and neglectful. Your great anxiety respecting the progress of your Swiss friends, Ulmius^ and his companion'', is a mark of your prudence; [2 Salvart was in tho suite of Prince Casimir.] [3 He was the son of John ab Ulniis, who had been fellow of St John's, Oxford.] [< John IliiUh-ich.] 520 L. HUMPHREY TO R. GUALTER. []lET. for it is always better to cherish a prudent fear than a too sanguine hope : this however I can truly affirm, that each of them is both studying hard with us, and conducting himself with propriety ; which assertion I have no doubt but that they will fully make good both to you and the senate. Since therefore I feel assured that the result will make this manifest to you, I cannot but recommend to you these young men of such excellent hope. I wrote to the bishop of Winchester, who has already contributed somewhat, and promises also that he will take charge of them from this time. Your intelligence of the death of P. M. and our other fathers, and of your son', formerly my pupil, is indeed most painful and dis- tressing ; on my own account, individually, who deservedly re- garded and loved them ; publickly, for the church's sake, for whom it is so grievous and lamentable to be continually losing everywhere so manv of her brightest ornaments. You, however, most reverend father, are a host in yourself, and I therefore entreat you to con- tinue to benefit the christain commonwealth by your learned and pious lucubrations ; so that the meditations of your old age, like the song of the swan, may delight us again and again. How severe is this loss of our most excellent men, England has long known to her cost; nor can she, I think, ever forget, and certainly ought not to remember without grief, so many funeral piles of martyrs yet recent; so many deaths of our most excellent men. Jewel ^, Parkhurst^, Pilkington*, and others. But these are the signs pre- ceding the end of the world, and the latest and most awful on which this our age has fallen. Satan is roaring like a Hon, the world is going mad, antichrist is resorting to every extreme, that he may with wolf-hke ferocity devour the sheep of Christ : the sea is full of phates, the soil of Flanders is wet with the blood of Christians ; in France, Guise is reported to rage in his new slaughter- house against the protestants. England, by the favour of God, is yet safe ; but how can she be secure from human malignity ? For it is greatly to be feared that the flames of our neighbour's house may reach us ; the Tridentine fathers enforcing that bloody decree of theirs, and our daily sins deserving the execution of it. The news is now reported in Flanders, that [duke] Casimir^ is lingering still in Guelderland, and is laying siege to Deventer, and [1 See n. 3, p. 432.] [2 See p. 382.] [3 See p. 488, n. 2.] [■« Pilkington died Jan. 23, 1575-6.] [5 Duke Casimir was the son of the Elector Palatine. He brought down an army of German horse and foot into the Netherlands, at the charge of Elizabeth. Camden's Eliz. p. 226.] CCXXIV.] L. HUMPHRFA' TO R. GUALTER. 521 that he shortly intends to unite his forces with our troops ; that the Austrian [Don John] is fortifying himself within the city, with ditches and trenches and walls ; that on the first of August he sent forth his hght troops against the English, French, and Scots ; that there was sharp fighting on hoth sides from eight o'clock till five in the evening ; that two hundred and fifty of our troops Avere slain, and eight hundred of the enemy's ; that our side bore away the victory ; that Norris ^ an Enghshman, had four horses killed under him, and then escaped, not without honour to himself and destruction to the Spaniards, whom they either routed or cut down. AVhat will be the end of this war, God Almighty knows, to whom I commend again and again the universal church, as well as yours and mine in particular, and your studies, and all our fathers and brethren, namely, masters Lavater and Ulmius, and Christopher Froschover, and all Zurich, formerly the hospitable retreat of Englishmen. Farewell, my most illustrious friend. Master Cole is well, and is now in the country. Oxford, Aug. 11, 1578. Your most respectful, Laurence Humphrey. CCXXV. L. HUMPHREY TO R. GUALTER. [A. 132.] Oxford, Dec. 17, 1578. Health in Christ Jesus. It is partly from my private regard and kind feeling towards them, and partly from their merit and necessity, that I am induced to write somewhat to you at this time about the private afi'airs and situation of Rodolph Ulmius and John Huldrich. For I must candidly confess that there is not here for them that provision which you ask, and which I desire myself; because those very members of the university who ought to assist others, are themselves in want, and dependent on the liberality of their friends. I wrote to the bishop of Winchester, who gave something to Rodolph ; and likewise to the earl of Bedford, who has always paid that regard to my letters, and especially to yours, which it was right and proper he should do. He [Rodolph] has lately returned to us from Devonshire, where the earl is now rcsidinjr, not indeed overburdened with money, but yet in some measure pro- [C "John Norris, the lord Norris his second son, the general of the English, fighting stoutly, had three horses slain under him, and got gi-eat comiuenda- tions in this battle for his martial valour." Camden's Eliz. p. 22G.J 522 L. HUMPHREY TO R. GUALTER. [lET. vided with it, and presented with a salary. I have placed both the young men in Broadgate HalP, as we call it, not far from Christ- church, where John's father was most hberally and kindly enter- tained in king Edward's time. Should I be able to afford any money, I will most willingly bestow it. But since charity is getting cold in tliis declining age of the world, and many of the French [protestants] are continually coming over to us with their families ; and as our people imagine that the Swiss are travelling for their own pleasure out of mere curiosity, rather than that they are necessarily banished on account of religion ; for this reason they have been supplied more sparingly and grudgingly than others. I therefore entreat you to aid them by your patronage, and earnestly to undertake their cause, so that care may be taken for the payment of their promised stipend as soon as possible. They appear amiable and studious ; and though they are at present unknown to our people, on account of the absence of Rodolph, who has been staying with the earl, yet when they shall have become known, they will more and more recommend themselves, and conciliate the regard and good will ofaU. We, as the saying is, are doing as we can. All things are settled at home: the pope attacks us, not with open hostility, but intrigue ; with bulls, abusive pamphlets, and secret machinations. The French are quiet, nor is a single spark of war bursting forth : besides, in Flanders they are all extinguished, since John of Austria is at rest, or rather removed by the pestilence 2. There is danger, however, of their quarrelling amongst themselves, and that, dis- tracted by war or internal dissensions, they will run headlong against their own vitals ; for what will not the dregs of faction effect ? May the Lord Jesus restrain in his goodness the mahgnity of these latter times ! [1 Broadgate Hall is now merged in Pembroke College.] [2 According to the most common opinion, says Moreri, he died of poison in his camp near Namur, Oct. 1, 1578. But lord Burghley thus wrote to the earl of Shrewsbury, from Theobald's, October 8th. "By letters which I have received within this three hours at London, I am certainly advertised that Don John do Austria is dead of the plague." Strype, Annals, 11. ii. 159. Camden adds, that he died, " as some say, out of very grief, because he found himself neglected by the king his brother, after he had gaped first after the kingdom of Tunis, whereby Guleta or Goletta in Africa Avas lost, [being takeu from the Spaniards in 1574 by Selim II.] and then after the kingdom of Eng- land; and had secretly entered into a confederacy with the Guises, without the privity of the French king and the Spaniard, for the defence of both crowns. Camden's Elizabeth, p. 227.] CCXXV.1 L. HUMPHREY TO R. GUALTER. 52S Garland Holland, an Oxford bookseller, salutes both you and master Christopher Froschover. Master Cole is now absent : mas- ter Westphaling^ desires me to send his regards to Juhus, as I do also for myself, wishing all of you every happiness. Master Lavater is, I hope, in good health. Continue to promote by your pious labours the cause of learning and religion, to the end that in this benighted age men, becoming by your means more and more enhghtened, may behold the light of divine truth by the blessing of God, whom I pray again and again to preserve your piety, together with all your friends, and the church of Zurich, (formerly the hospitable abode of the English,) both to you and to ourselves. In haste. Oxford, December 17, 1578. Farewell, most learned sir. Your most respectful, Laurence Humphrey. CCXXVI. R. HILLES TO R. GUALTER. [B. 125.] London, Jan. 10, 1579. Much health. I understood, my very honoured and beloved friend in Christ our Lord and Saviour, by your letter dated at Zurich on the seventh of last November, that you were in good health ; and I pray our gracious God very long to preserve you to his glory and the edifying of his church. It afforded me indeed great com- fort to learn from your aforesaid letter, that you have borne with such firmness and resignation the loss of your very dear sons and intimate friends ; because " blessed are the dead which die in the Lord ; even so, saith the Spirit, for they rest from their labours. " For if you were to wear yourself out by constant grief, you could never expect any benefit or advantage therefrom : for it is most certain that they will never return into this world, and it is equally certain that you will go to them. The letter, which I received inclosed in yours for master Laurence Humphrey, I sent to him at Oxford, on the last day of December, by a trustworthy messenger, who brings letters from the university every week. So that there is no doubt but that he has most certainly given your letter aforesaid to master doctor Humphrey before this time. But I pray you, that in case you should have any other letters directed to me, you would send them to Strasburgh, to master Theobald Behem, a merchant there, who [3 Herbert Westphaling was a canon of Christ Church, and afterwards Bishop of Hereford. Strype, Parker, ir. 6 ; Whitgift, i. 466.] 524 R. HILLES TO R. GUALTER. [lET. can send them to me without any difficulty, and that you will not forget to send the money for the postage at the same time, for other- wise I fear that he will not send the letters so readily by the Spires post. I have to thank you for having written me the news you had then heard about the duke d'Alen^on, (who is, as I understand, the brother of the king of France); and I now send you word in return, that this same duke d'Alen9on, at the end of last December, went away into France, together with all his troops, from a town of the Low Countries, called Bergen in German, and Mons in French. But the Flemish themselves say, that it is in this way he means to defend that town against king Philip, as his grandfather did the city of Metz against the emperor Charles the fifth. I pray you, commend me to my old friend Julius Sancterentianus (who is employed in Froschover''s printing office as a corrector of the press) and tell him that I received, two months since, his kind letter, dated at Zurich on the 24th of August, and also, a month after, the five books specified in the same letter. One of these I have kept for myself as he desired ; the others I have sent to Oxford by a trusty messenger, to master Herbert Westphahng, canon of Christchurch. Tell him too, that, according to his desire, I will, God willing, repeat the service I have hitherto done him, in pro- curing his Oxford pension. I sent my letter dated in August last, to the late autumnal fair at Frankfort to master Christopher Froschover of Zurich, respecting which I expect shortly the answer of Julius Sancterentianus. And I hope that this was the letter which you understand to have been the last written by me to your friend Julius, as you mentioned at the beginning of your letter. My wife, who is now-a-days a great invalid, (though she is now, thank God, tolerably well,) especially salutes you. I pray God of his goodness to preserve you in safety, together -with your wife and all your family. Farewell. London, Jan. 10. In the year of Christ's birth, 1578. English style. Yours, according to my ability, Richard Hilles. CCXXVII. BISHOP COX TO R. GUALTER. [A. 133.] Feb. 28, 1579. As I was delighted by your letter, and the book which was sent me after the last Frankfort fair, so I am much distressed, my Gualter, that some part of Germany is disturbed by those mis- CCXXVII.] BISHOP COX TO R. GUALTER. 525 cliievous dissensions, of which God is not the author, but that wicked one, who daringly employs his agents in involving great men in error, in disturbing the church, and instigating unto iniquity the enemies of godliness. We have good hopes of [the archbishop of] Canterbury. Our queen, who is in general most benign, was somewhat ^ offended with him. She is herself chastising the papists and contentious in good earnest. She will have all things done with order and decency. She possesses learned, and prudent, and pious councillors. The ministers of the word, however, are not yet admitted into that reverend assembly. As to what you write concerning Ireland (in which country the Roman antichrist is so wont to make mischief,) should any distur- bance arise, it will easily be repressed, either by our soldiers, who are always quartered there, or, should occasion require it, by a regular army. A short time since, however, the Earl of Essex, a man of the highest rank, and devotedly attached to our holy religion ^ and the most severe scourge of the Irish, was taken off by disease^, to the great sorrow of many persons. I am filled with joy, that God by his wonderful providence has delivered the people of Geneva from their enemies sent by Satan. [1 Grindal was confined and sequestered in June, 1577, for his non- compliance with the queen's command with respect to the putting down the religious exercises and conferences of ministers, called prophcsyings. See Strype, Grindal, 343. "The period expired without affecting his virtuous con- stancy, and subsequent severities kept him in disgrace and inactivity neai'ly to the end of his life." Soames's Elizabethan Hist. p. 227.] [2 Sir Nicholas White gives the particulars of the death of the earl of Essex in a letter to Lord Bui-ghley, dated Sept. 30, 1576. He writes, among other things, that at the last yielding up of his breath, he cried, Couradge, couradge, I am a soldier that must fight under the banner of my Saviour Christ. See Strype, Annals, ii. ii. 84.] [3 The earl of Essex died Sept. 22, 1576, not without suspicion of being poisoned by means of the carl of Leicester. See Strype, Annals, ii. i. 576, and ii. 83. " A very excellent man certainly he was, in whom honesty of car- riage vied with the nobility of birth ; both which notwithstanding could not prevail against envy. For after ho was constrained to give over his laudable enterprise in Ireland, ho returned into England, having much wasted his estate; where openly threatening Leicester, whom he suspected to have done him injuries, he was by his cunning court tricks, who stood in fear of him, and by a peculiar court mystery of wounding and ovcrthroM'ing men by hon- ours, sent back into Ireland with the insignificant title of Earl Marshal of Ireland, where pining away with grief and sorrow, he piously rendered his soul to Christ, dying of a bloody flux in the midst of grievous torments. " Camden's Elizabeth, p. 217.] 526 BISHOP cox TO R. GUALTER. [lET. This it is to trust in tlie Lord as a most strong tower ; this it is to be anxiously concerned for the glory of God, and to lay down one's life for it. This faith and godly unity vanquishes and puts to flight even the most bitter enemies. "Behold, how good and how pleasant it is for brethren to dwell together in unity." Duke Casimir*, a man of great fortitude and faith, is now with us, and he is here too not without a great hope of good. May the Lord Jesus protect you with your pious flocks, both from popish enemies, and from those who went out from us, when yet they were not of us ! But I must not be altogether unmindful of my friend Julius. I send you five pounds of our money : take three parts for your- self, and let Julius have two from you. Feb. 28, 1579. The attached friend of your piety, and most holy function, Richard Cox, bishop of Ely. CCXXVIII. FRANCIS, EARL OF BEDFORD, TO [R. GUALTER.] [B. 126.] Exeter, Feb. 28, 1579. Your letter, most excellent sir, wherein you recommended John Rodolph Ulmer^, gratified me exceedingly ; and he also is dear to me, not only by reason of my general good-will and affection for his country, and especially for yourself and his father ; but I have also a wonderful regard for him by reason of his manifold good qualities. For he is a youth of honourable principles, such a one indeed as all good men will both love and praise as he deserves ; and, as I un- derstand from those who were acquainted with him at the university of Oxford, he is not only devoted to learning, but likewise entirely [1 Duke Casirair was the son of Frederick, Elector Palatine of the Rhine, and came into England in the month of January, in a sharp and snowy win- ter, to excuse himself about the miscarriage of his expedition, layhig the whole blame upon the French. He was most honourably received, and con- ducted with great pomp into London, with torches lighted, by the Lord Mayor, the aldermen and citizens, and to the court by the chief of the nobility; where he was entertained with tilting, ban-iers, and costly banquets, and honom-od with the order of St George, the queen herself buckling on tho garter about his leg. Camden's Elizabeth, p. 232. See also Strype, Annals, ir. i. 160] [2 See Letter CCXXV. p. 521. Ulmer was tho son of John ab Ulmis, who came to England in king Edward's time, under the patronage of the duke of Suffolk, and was made fellow of St John's College, Oxford. He died in 1580, and his descendants took the name of Ulmer.] CCXXVIII.] FRANCIS, EARL OF BEDFORD, TO [r. GUALTER.] 527 engaged in the pursuit of it, in which he has, by the divine blessing, made such progress, that I have no doubt but that his studies will ere long tend to the glory of God and the benefit of his church. I greatly rejoice that your country is flourishing and prosperous both in religion and in all other respects; and am glad, most learned sir, and reverend father in Christ, that you are not yet worn out in your holy zeal for godliness, and your endeavours to promote the glory of God. And I heartily pray God to strengthen you more and more, and enrich you with liis gifts, and defend you with his protection. Most excellent sir, farewell. Exeter, Feb. 28, 1579. Your most devoted in the Lord, F. Bedford. P. S. I thank you very much, most learned sir, for your singular kindness to me when I was with you in your country ; and I earnestly entreat you to do the same in my name to the whole host of my Zurich Maecenases. CCXXIX. W. COLE TO R. GUALTER. [B. 127.] OxFOKD, Feb. 28, 1579. There has come to me, most learned su", a certain young man of Zurich, Ulmer's son^, who, after some days as he tells me, is about to return to you, I could not refuse giving him a letter to you, who deserved so well of me when I was an exile many years since ; not that I have at this time any thing worth your reading, but lest you should suppose, from my not writing, that I am unmindful of the obhgations I have received. I hear that your sonS lately a scholar of Oxford, and a youth of excellent promise, has been removed by an untimely death : which event indeed we all of us, to whom he was familiarly known during his sojourn in this place, most deeply deplore, not only on your account, as hav- ing lost a son of so much expectation, but more, as it is right we should do, because at this time the church of Christ cannot spare so much talent without great injury. With respect to our EngUsh friends who were in exile with me at Zurich, I have nothing to write, except that out of so many scarcely five are now remaining. Master Horn the most excellent bishop of Winchester is in a very infirm state of health. Master [3 Seo the preceding Letter.] [•« Sec above, Letter CCXXIV. p. 520.] 528 W. COLE TO R. GUALTER. [lET. Mullins^ is archdeacon of London; master Reniger^ archdeacon of Winchester ; master Humphrey and myself preside over two colleges at Oxford, he at Magdalene and I at Corpus Christi. All the others have departed this life. From this you see to how small a number they are reduced, who sometime lived with you as exiles ; and you see too in what a state are the affairs of us who as yet survive them. But if you wish to know what is the state of religion throughout all England, it is precisely the same as it has been from the beginning of the reign of our most serene queen Ehzabeth. There is no change whatever. The queen of Scotland is with us, but not as an independent sovereign, nor is she at Hberty to wander about at her pleasure. In Scotland they are most actively guarding and protecting the true rehgion, and every thing there is in a state of quiet and tranquillity. I hear that the duke of Parma' is pre-^ paring an army against the Low Countries. Casimir* has been honourably received by our queen, nor do I know whether any visitor has ever been more agreeable to her. The duke d'Alen9on^ is daily expected. He is in hopes, as I hear, of forming a matri- monial alliance here in England. I have thought fit to tell you these things at this time, especially as I have met with so opportune a messenger. Salute all my friends, and especially masters Lavater, Bullinger, Froschover, my JuUus, &c. Farewell, my very dear sir, and return my affection for you. Oxford, Feb. 28, 1579. Your most attached, William Cole. [1 John Mullins was fellow of Magdalene college, Oxford, and one of the exiles at Zurich in 1555. He was made successively archdeacon of London, canon residentiary of St Paul's, and rector of Becking. Stiype, Whitgift, i. 245.] [2 Michael Reniger was expelled Magdalene college, Oxford, by Bishop Gardiner, and became an exile. He was afterwards chaplain to queen Eliza- beth, and prebendaiy of Winchester. Stiype.] [3 The duke of Parma was appointed governor of the Netherlands on the death of Don John of Austria in the autumn of 1578. Strype, Ann. ii. ii. 159.] [4 Seep. 526, n. 1.] [5 The duke d'Alcn^on, or d'Anjou, to which title he succeeded on the accession of his brother to the throne of France, arrived privately in England with one or two only in his company, and came to the queen unexpectedly at her court at Greenwich. He made a second visit in 1581, and remained three months, in hopes of completing his proposed marriage with the queen. See Strype, ii. ii. 317. Camden, Eliz. 233, 267.] CCXXX.] H. LANGUET TO P. HUBNER. 529 CCXXX. HUBERT LANGUET TO PETER HUBNER^. ^B. 128.] Dated at Baden, June 4, 1579. Much health. I am surprised that you have not written to me respecting the studies of our young gentleman, master Sidney ; for I very much expected from you some account of them. I sup- pose you remember what I told you, when conversing with you respecting his education ; namely, that it is the especial desire of his illustrious father and brother, that he should acquire a correct knowledge of the German language ; which I do not think will be difficult for him, if only the quickness of his understanding and strength of his memory are seconded by dihgence and apphcation ; and if you frequently admonish him of his duty, and attentively perform your part, not only in explaining to him such passages in German as he may afterwards turn into Latin, but especially by conversing with him in German : for his being accustomed to con- verse in German is of far more importance to him than the study of German writers ; for whatever German works contain any thing that may tend to the cultivation of his understanding, are almost all of them translated into languages with which he is acquainted. And he will never learn to speak German with fluency by the study of the German writers, even though he should devote a whole hfe to that object, unless he adds thereunto the habit of conversation. The commencement of such a habit will indeed be disagreeable to him, but it will grow pleasant in time ; for when he shall perceive that he has made any progress, he will derive pleasure from that circumstance, and be rendered more active in making a farther advancement. But you must take care that you are not wanting to him in this matter ; for you are well aware that I particularly requested it of you, and that you gave me your promise ; and if you find your admonitions not very agreeable to him, you must not desist on that account, but persevere in your instruction. And if you do this there is no reason to doubt but that he will at length feel thankful to you ; for he will perceive that you are acting with a desire for his advantage ; and as he is of a generous disposition, he will in no wise make an ill return for the benefit. Farewell. From Baden, June 4, 1579. Your most attached, Hubert Languet. \} The original of this letter is prcscrs'ed at Zofingcn. — Peter Ilubner was educated at Heidelberg under Ursinus. Sec Pears's correspondence of Sidney and Languet, p. 161.] 34 530 G. BUCHANAN TO R. GUALTER. [lET. CCXXXI. G. BUCHANAN TO R. GUALTER. [B. 129.] Dated July 24, 1579. I RECEIVED your former letter, together with the books, many months after you had sent them. The book I gave, as you de- sired me, to the king, who received it as he ought, that is, with a most favourable disposition towards you. He also sent in return such a message as occurred to him at the moment, and especially the following, " Whereas all my subjects are very greatly indebted to you, you have not only Avished to involve me also in your debt, but have almost bound me to a personal service in default of payment, inasmuch as you take your share of a most heavy bur- den, partly to lighten our labour, partly to cultivate our yet in- experienced mind, and prepare it to receive the seed of learning and to brino' forth o-ood fruit," And since the labours of each of us has respect to the cultivation of the understanding, our share in it may fitly be compared to the industry of the husband- man, and yours to that celestial influence which renders all labour productive, and by the due temperature of the seasons gives the corn its increase. But your last letter, dated at Zurich in De- cember 1577? did not reach us until August 1579. I have now been absent from court more than six weeks, by reason of ill- health ; but as soon as I return thither, I will endeavour that the king shall steal a few moments from his occupations, to give you a testimony of his favourable regard towards you with his own hand ; and should I not be able to accomplish this myself, I will take care that it shall be managed by my colleague, the pious and learned Peter Young ^, who will watch for a favourable opportunity of introducing the subject. Meanwhile I send you my commentary upon government"-, written indeed in troublous times, but now at last published after a moderate interval ; the \} Mr Peter Young was one of king James's preceptors, and also his almoner. Sir James Melvil says of him that he was gentle, and loath to offend the king at any time, cai'rying himself warily, as a man who had mind of his own weal, by keeping of his majesty's favour. Melvil's Memoirs, p. 125.] [2 This work was published in 1579, and entitled De jure regni apud Scotos. It was answered by Adam Blackwood in a book entitled Adversus Oeorg. Biichanani Dialogum dejure regnandi apud Scotos pro regibus apologia, Pictavii, 1581 ; and by W. Barclay in his book, De regno et regali potestate, Parisiis. IGOO. It was condemned, together with other books, by the university of Oxford, in full convocation, July 21, 1683, the very day of lord Russel's execution ; which deci'ec however was ordered by the House of Lords to be CCXXXI.J G. BUCHANAN TO R. GUALTER. 531 tumult having been assuaged, and the minds of men having become more accustomed to discourses of tliis kind. My labour may possibly seem superfluous, and especially as the lucubrations of so many most learned men have already been set forth upon the same subject. But as they had collected a few scattered, though very excellent maxims upon this matter, I thought that I should not altogether lose my pains if I were to reduce them into method, and discuss the whole subject, not at random, but in an orderly and well-digested manner. And if good and learned men shall think that I have not failed in my endeavours, I shall not regard the approbation of the many. July 24, in the year of Christ's birth 1579. CCXXXII. ARCHBISHOP SANDYS TO R. GUALTER [A. 134.] LoN'DOK, Dec. !i, ISJU- At one and almost the same moment, most learned and, on so many accounts, most honoured sir, I received two letters from you ; and almost two years after they were sent, through a mistake, I suppose, in the address. For they were directed to the bishop of London, though three years have elapsed since my translation to the archbishoprick of York; so that your letters, seeking me in London, were later in reaching these northern parts of the king- dom. Now, however, as I am desirous of replying to your letters, these are the points more especially on which I wish you to be satisfied ; that I keep in remembrance your regard for me, and that I still firmly remain your friend and faithful brother. It does not escape my observation, that we are arrived at such a state of the times as is daily bringing forth some novelty or other : 1 should commit to paper such as arc most fitting for you to be acquainted with, were it not that through the unhappiness of this age I have seen many things soberly written and piously conceived, partly from being lost, and partly from being intercepted, occasion very great danger to those who wrote them. That I may not, however, decline all information, accept the following. A treaty of marriage^ is now on foot between the queen's majesty and the burnt "by the hangman," March 21, 1701, after the trial of Dr Sacheverel. Robertson says of it, that it is founded, not on tlie niaxiins of feudal, but of ancient republican governments. Hist, of Scotland, i. 382.] [3 The articles propounded on the part of the duke of Anjou, when he was here, in order to his marriage, to bo granted by the queen and the lords of 34—2 582 ARCHGisriop sandvs to k. gualter. [i.et. brother of the king of France. What, however, will be the result, and what bearing it will have upon our affairs, scarce any one can tell. We pray God that he may deign to continue propitious to us. The purity of the christian religion is flourishing and prosperous among us, and can neither be overturned nor defiled by any devices of Satan. For although we are unable altogether to banish from the church, so as to prevent the appearance of a remarkable variety of names and opinions, those new men whom we call puritans, who tread all authority under foot ; or the veteran papists, who celebrate their divine service in their secret corners ; or the profane disput- ants, who deride the true worship of God; such, however, is the number and influence of the truly faithful, that both in numbers and appearance it very far takes the lead of all the separatists ; and we entertain the best hope, that he who hath begun this good work in us will perfect it unto the day of the Lord Jesus. The arch- bishop of Canterbury, Edmund Grindal, who presided over the churches of London and York before me, not having acted alto- gether in compliance with the queen's wishes, is now confined^ to his palace, from which he is not allowed to move : I hope, however, and believe that in a short time he will be fully restored to liberty. Dr Horn, the bishop of Winchester, has departed^ this life ; but no successor is yet appointed to that diocese. Ireland" is in a state of disturbance, owing to the seditious tumults of the rebels. Generals however are assigned, and soldiers enlisted, to reduce them to obedience. The affairs of the protestants hor council, with their answers to each article, are preserved in Stiype, Annals, ii. ii. 631. See also p. 317, &c. for an account of the duke's departure, from which it appears that " such was her majesty's presence of mind, and care of her subjects' welfare, that she subdued her private affection for the public good." This is farther evident from her letter to Sir Edward Stafford in the following year, whom she had sent away to France, to obsei-ve the be- haviour of the French towards the Low Countries, of which the sovereignty had been offered to the duke of Anjou, and which she wished him to decline. She writes therein, " My mortal foe can no ways wish me a greater losse than England's hate, neither should death be less welcome unto me than such mishap betide me." Queen Elizabeth and her Times, Vol. ii. p. 151.] [1 See note 1, p. 525.] [2 Bishop Horn died in the month of June, 1579. His will was proved on the 27th of that month. Strype, Annals, ii. ii. 378.] [3 That land indeed was now oppressed with the popish nobility and gentry there, who had raised a rebellion against the queen, headed by the earl of Desmond, lord Baltinglas, with an invasion of Italians and Spaniards, accompanied with the pope's blessing. Strypo, Annals, ii. ii. 330. For a full account of this rebellion see Camden's Elizabeth, p. 236, &c.] CCXXXII.] ARCHBISHOP SANDYS TO R. GUALTER. 533 in Flanders are going on Avell ; for the papist malcontents, who are plotting against both their lives and fortunes, have recently suffered a most severe loss, and are thought to be not far from the total loss of all their influence in those parts. As a testimony and token of my regard for you, my very dear friend, I was exceedingly desirous of sending you some of our wares, if any merchant would be willing to export them. But as I could not find any one bold enough to undertake the risk, (as these times are so surrounded with danger on all sides,) I hope that you will take in good part this lone and naked letter. And so, wishing you no less happiness than myself, now living in London, and waiting for the opening of parhament on the 20th of January, I desire for you and all your friends health in Christ. London, in England, December 9, 1579. Your brother in Christ, and most loving friend, Edwin Sandys, Ebor. CCXXXIII. R. GUALTER TO G. BUCHANAN. [B. 130.] Dated March 8, 1580. I WAS indeed surprised, most excellent and much-honoured sir, that I had for three whole years received no reply to my letters to the most serene king and yourself. But I have lately disco- vered that your letter met with the same fate as my own ; for that which you wrote on the 24th of July last year, I received on the 6th of January. The longer however that it was in coming, the greater pleasure it afforded me, as announcing that my book had been so graciously received, and that this service of mine had been approved by one so learned as yourself, whose opinion I prefer to that of almost any others. I regret however that I am in the meantime deprived of that pleasure which I should have derived from your first letter. But as I have not seen it even unto this day, it must either have been destroyed by the perfi- diousness of the malevolent, or from some other cause. But it is enough, as I said, that my service was not without gratification both to the most serene king and to yourself. And should there be added the testimony of the royal favour towards me written Avith his own hand, as you have so kindly promised, I shall then think myself happy in this respect. There arrived together with your letter your book, De jure regni apud Scotos ; Avhich I have not only read myself, but have 534 R. GUALTEK TO G. BUCHANAN. [^ET. lent to my colleagues and fellow-ministers to read and examine ; all of whom entertain the same opinion as myself, namely, that the book is written with equal learning and authority, as it is with piety. And I wish that all kings would be persuaded of what you so well and piously state in it ; for then would their subjects be more happy, and they themselves would not only reign happily on earth, but would also enjoy a participation of the heavenly kingdom, with the King of kings and Lord of lords, Jesus Christ. But be- cause few of them entertain these feelings, and the greater part of them are corrupted by the blandishments of flatterers, and most abandoned characters ; while they fancy themselves kings, they become the slaves of the most vile affections and vices ; besides which they fleece the flock committed to their trust, of which they ought to be the shepherds, and at last ruin them together with themselves. I therefore esteem the most serene king of Scotland as fortunate and happy, in having obtained, in so corrupt an age, such an instructor, who is able to imbue his youthful mind with most Avholesome precepts, and implant in him the seeds of truly royal virtues. And I hope that God, who has bestowed upon him this favour, will also grant that he may obey these salutary rules of conduct, and live happy and prosperous with his people, and rule them to the glory of his name. Thus have I thought fit to reply to your letter, and at the same time to recommend that if no more direct mode of transmitting letters to us should occur, you should send them to the most reverend Edwin Sandys, arch- bishop of York, with whom I have kept up a friendship of many years, and who will take care that they shall be forwarded to me by his agents in London. Farewell, most excellent sir. Zurich, March 8, in the year of the incarnation of the eternal Son of God, 1580. Your most loving, Rodolph Gualter. CCXXXIV. H. ZANCHIUS TO SIR F. WALSINGHAM. [B. 131.] Neustadt, Sept. 24, 1581. Greeting. When that most excellent man, John Sturmius, left us yesterday, he desired me, most illustrious sir, to write to you respecting his visit to us, the reason of it, and also respecting his departure. I said that I had not any acquaintance, much less any familiar intercourse with you ; he replied, that he knew for certain that my letter would be agreeable to you, and that he CCXXXIV,] H. ZANCHIUS TO SIR F. WALSINGHAM. 535 hoped this my writing would prove as it were the beginning of a friendship between us ; for that you were so exceedingly well- disposed towards the professors of learning and godliness, that I should never have to repent of this service. I have no occasion, therefore, most honourable sir, to explain the reasons of my having thus ventured to write to you, as I have now briefly stated them. I only request that with your wonted discretion and kmdness you will take in good part my simple style of writing, as that of an old man who has long since bade farewell to all the ornaments of composition. The good okP man has suffered greatly by reason of his bold and open defence of the truth", which he has so stoutly defended, as he is still determined to do, that, being obliged in some measure to give way to the times, (for some parties threatened him with im- prisonment,) he quitted Strasburgh on the first of August, and came to us the following day, where he was most hospitably entertained by every one, and especially by our most illustrious prince, who presented him with a golden medal of himself, as a mark of respect ; and he, on his part, wonderfully refreshed us all, and edified the whole city by his reverend presence, his weighty and most learned discourse, and what is more, his decided evidences of piety, in hearing sermons, and partaking of the sacrament of the Lord's supper. He wrote during this time, for he was never unemployed, three books against the apostle of ubiquity, but they have not yet seen the light. His cause was long agitated in the senate, and he was at length recalled by a letter from the magistrates, the public faith being pledged for his safety. Yesterday therefore, which was the 23rd Sept. 1581, all the expenses of his entertainment having been defrayed by the treasury of the most illustrious prince, he departed early in the morning for Strasburgh, well and hearty, and accom- panied by some brethren, recommending to me repeatedly and most earnestly to write to you as he had desired. You have then, most honourable sir, the fulfilment of Sturmius's injunction to me, that I should salute you, and acquaint you by my [^ Sturmius was at this time 74 years old. lie dictl in ir>89, in the eighty- third year of his age.] [2 Sturmius entertained Zuingle's opinions respecting the i"eal presence, in consequence of whicli he was much persecuted by the Lutheran ministers of Strasburgli, and at hist deprived of his rectorshij) of the university there, through the instrumentality of a divine named Pappus, Avith whom he had a long and tedious controvei'sy. See Bayle, and Melchior Adam.] 536 H. ZANCHIUS TO SIR F. WALSINGHAM. [l ET. letter of his visit, and his departure ; which office I have undertaken the more readily, as I hoped that what Sturmius without any hesitation ventured to promise, would come to pass, namely, that my letter would not be displeasing to you, and that you would admit me among the number of your friends ; which that you may do, I earnestly entreat you. May the Lord Jesus Christ preserve the queen's most serene majesty, all the nobility, the church and state, yourself and all good men ; 'for by him, saith the apostle, do all things consist. Neustadt. Sept. 24, 1581. Your excellency's, H. Zanchius. CCXXXV. QUEEN ELIZABETH TO THE CONFEDERATE SWISS CANTONS. [B. 132.] Oatlands, Sept. 1, 1583. Elizabeth, by the grace of God, of England, France and Ireland, queen, &c., to the mighty and magnificent lords, the con- federate lords of all Switzerland, health and prosperity. On con- sideration of the proceedings which have lately taken place, and still are taking place, by the command, and as it is pretended, in the name of the duke of Savoy ' my cousin ; on consideration too, of the causes of these disorders, and of the result that may be expected from them, not to mention that the most flourishing nations, and fairest cities, which have sprung from far more abject beginnings, are now lying overwhelmed and prostrate; it then came into my mind that it would be worth while to inform you of the things necessary for you to be acquainted with, and in which you appear to me to be especially interested. And of these there are two things in particular ; one of which relates to a good understanding among yourselves, and which should have very great weight with you ; the other, which requires you to aid and assist in all their need those who are members of your body ; and the more especially, since whatever benefit you confer upon them, will redound to your- selves. And I have no doubt but that you duly weigh in your [1 In the year 1581, the duke of Savoy, by the pope and other popish setters on, and by his own ambition accompanying, laboured to obtain the city and dominion of Geneva, famous for its religion, and a great nurse of pious men, and hai'bourer of exiles for religion : and which had been taken, had it not been prevented by the seasonable aid of some of their neighbours the Helvetians. The council sent a letter to the bishops, and ordered a col- lection to be made in behalf of the Genevese. See Strype, Whitgift, 412, &c. See also Lauffer's Helvetische Geschichte, 10 Th. pp. 286, 287.] CCXXXV.l QUEEN ELIZABETH TO THE CONFEDERATE SWISS CANTONS. 5o7 minds how profitable and necessary these remedies which are now stated by me, will be for your own liberty against every attack of your enemies. The commendations of your wisdom are now cele- brated in the discourses and languages of almost all nations ; to say nothing of the distinguished praise of your valour, respecting which no age wijl ever be silent; and on account of which no one, how- ever powerful he may be in every description of troops, has at any time dared to make any secret attack against your safety and commonwealth, except those who have artfully insinuated themselves into the favour and friendship of particular parties ; if you give place, however, to men of that kind, there is danger lest they should endeavour to diffuse at length pestiferous poison through the whole body, and this, while it will be advantageous to them, will be to yourselves ruinous and destructive. They act rightly there- fore, who reject artifices of this kind ; for they will in this way watch over their own safety, and will subdue their enemies, even without any injury to themselves. For indeed evil counsel is most dangerous to him who proposes it, and deceitful artifices fall to pieces of their own accord ; whereas, when the bond of peace is in the mean time daily becoming more close, it can be weakened or dissolved by no stratagems whatever. Consider, I pray you, the state of France ; look upon Flanders ; with what intestine wars France has for some time been ravins:, and is almost reduced to desolation ; while Flanders is lying before our eyes prostrate and overthrown. Each has met with a downfall which they would never have experienced if they had in the smallest degree studied peace and concord. But now they have mutually enfeebled each other, and neither of them dares trust the other ; since confidence is not easily restored to reconciled friends, and they are continually open to the charge of suspicion. But with respect to Geneva, I admit that it is not very power- ful ; yet it is nevertheless a member of your body, and therefore, the greater injm^y it sustains, the more deeply wounded is the whole of your Switzerland. And although some of you, who enter- tain a different opinion, do not consider this, yet let them beware lest they some time experience the truth of it to their own cost. The friendly intercourse that has for some years past existed be- tween yourselves and the city of Geneva, to the great advantage of both parties, you should be induced to confirm by mutual ofiices of kindness, as becomes neighbours ; for if that still remain constant and uninterrupted, what mischief could happen to either party, whicli would not affect the other ? $38 QUEEN ELIZABETH TO THE CONFEDERATE SWISS CANTONS. [lET. Add to this tliat Geneva is the market, and key to your terri- tory, by which your enemies may easily be hindered from making war upon yourselves. But when Geneva is taken you will then have to consider for yourselves what security remains for you. Indeed, that very thing which is now in dispute between you and those who abuse the tender age of a good prince, supplied a reason to your ancestors to bind themselves in alliance with the people of Geneva under all circumstances whatever. Wherefore if they were right in what they did, you yourselves will easily perceive how you ought to act in the defence of this Genevese cause, both for your own advantage and with the approval of almost all nations. I entreat therefore, and compassionately request your wisdom again and again, to vouchsafe, after the manner and courage of the Swiss, to bestow your strenuous exertions and active endeavours with respect to this affair, which is one of common interest both to yourselves and the people of Geneva ; a.nd that you will be unani- mous in defending this neighbouring city from all stratagems and attacks, as far as lies in your power. I request moreover, that you will not think it beneath you to mitigate by your entreaties •and intercession, that ill-will which this young prince has perhaps conceived against your confederates, and to request his excellency to commit the matter to law, and prosecute it in a civil suit before competent judges ; or rather let him know the whole state of the case, namely, how all things have been settled, and for what object; namely, that he may not have to deal with the Genevese only, but with the whole of confederate Switzerland ; and that you are pre- pared to undergo any thing for them, who have hitherto offered and presented all their services and honours to his excellency ; any thing, I say, that the pledged faith of your confederation shall seem to require. If you will do this, it will not only be to your perpetual honour and commendation among all nations, but you will also especially consult your own safety. Farewell. From my palace at Oatlands, Sept. 1, 1583. Your confederation's very loving, Elizabeth K.. CCXXXVI. QUEEN ELIZABETH TO THE FOUR CITIES. [B. 133.] Oatlands, Sept. 1, 1583. Elizabeth, by the grace of God, of England, France, and Ireland, queen, defender of the faith, &c. To the mighty lords and most honourable consuls and senators of the four cities of Zuricli, Berne, Basle, and Schaffhausen, our very dear friends. CCXXXVI.] QUEEN ELIZARETH TO THE FOUR CITIES. 539 Mighty lords, most honourable men, and very dear friends. To intercede with your piety on behalf of your allies, or to warn you of your danger now sufficiently foreseen and guarded against, would be an oifence against our friendship, if we did it not out of entire affection for you ; but as you will not be displeased that you are loved by us, and will plainly perceive that we are anxious for your common peace, we do not doubt but that our endeavours will be gratifying to you. . It is the affair and cause of the people of Geneva that we com- mend to you ; and which is neither alien from the communion of the same Christ and gospel that you profess, nor separate and estranged from the participation of your danger, inasmuch as they have the same enemies as yourselves ; those namely, who, on ac- count of the purity of the reformed rehgion which we profess, have conspired against the lives of all those who profess the gospel ; and who indeed adopt various devices to overwhelm us separately, though they every where follow the same purpose and design. But since they are unable to attain their object by open violence, (for they would desire to cut us all off at one blow) they drive their wedo;es, and contrive secret artifices against us bv severino' us into parts, and mutually separating us from each other. And, in pro- portion as they are more active in this one object, namely, that of distracting us into parties, they render us more vigilant in cherish- ing and promoting concord among ourselves ; and the sooner we perceive evil arising from any neighbouring evil, the more active ouo'ht we to be in wardino; off this neighbourinj]: evil from our neighbours, lest the contagion which by our fault has once begun to attack one member, may by an unavoidable fatality be extended over the whole body. We have written thus moderately, that you may consider attentively, again and again, what ought immediately to be done under the present circumstances. And it is this ; that you have a due concern for your allies ; that you regard the danger which now seems to belong only to themselves, as your own in common ; wherefore you must exert all your influence, all your assistance, all your endeavours for their relief ; and agreeing among yourselves must at no time desist from their defence. This we have a right to request by reason of our friendship, and we shall never refuse you any thing, which you may think to appertain to the maintenance of your security. JMay your lordships live well and happily. Given from our palace at Oatlands, on the first of September, in the year of our Lord 1583, and of our reign the 25th. Earnestly desiring your safety, Elizabeth R. 540 QUEEN ELIZABETH TO THE CANTONS OF SWITZERLAND. [lET. CCXXXVII. QUEEN ELIZABETH TO THE THIRTEEN CANTONS OF SWITZERLAND. [A. 135.] Greenwich, July 18, 1590. Elizabeth, by the grace of God, of England, France and Ireland, queen, defender of the faith, &c. ; to the high and mighty- lords, and right worthy masters, the consuls and proconsuls, rulers, syndics, authorities and governments of the thirteen cantons of the illustrious Swiss nation, greeting. High and mighty lords, and right worthy sirs : As allies and neighbours, you cannot be ignorant of the aid and assistance that is required by the distressed condition of your confederate city of Geneva, oppressed as it has now been for many years with an almost uninterrupted blockade by two most powerful enemies, the king of Spain, and the duke' of Savoy, his son-in-law. And we have no doubt but that your mightinesses, in accordance with the good faith of the treaties" mutually contracted between you, and for the honour of your nation, will have such regard to your common defence in this dispute, as not to allow that city to be abandoned and exposed to the licentiousness of upstart pretenders, as far may be' in your power to prevent it. To such a resolution, if it were necessary, we certainly should not fail to exhort you : but foras- much as those who of their own accord are sufficiently intent upon the public welfare, have no need of any one to prompt them, we willingly abstain from that kind of address ; only requesting your mightinesses, in conformity with the good-will and friendship which has so long subsisted between the kings of England our ancestors and your illustrious nation, not to be neglectful of your own indivi- dual security. For it is meet that your mightinesses should consider, that in this beleaguerment of the Genevese, the beleaguerment of all and every of your own several states is the thing finally aimed at ; and that in the fall of that city is involved the destruction of you all. You may take as a proof of this the plots and machinations which this same king has essayed against ourself and our dominions, as well as those which he is even now attempting against the very flourishing realm of France, together with his impotent lust of power, inasmuch as nothing either happens or can happen, but \} Charles Emanuel, duke of Savoy, married Catherine, daughter of Philip the Second.] [2 In 1584, the republic of Geneva concluded a treaty with Zurich and Berne, by which it became allied to the Swiss cantons.] CCXXXVIl.] QUEEN' ELIZABETH TO THE CANTONS OF SWITZERLAND. 541 that it allowcth him no rest day nor night from taking up arms and forming offensive alliances throughout almost all parts of this our western world. Which alhances however he will in vain either estabhsh amongst us, or set in activity against us, if you, with souls united in conformity with the league of you aforetime mutually sworn to, will not brook the unripping and undoing of your respective amities and coalitions. For in this alone consists both the most powerful safeguard of our ene- mies and redoubtableness of their arms, and also the strongest bulwark and impregnable fortress of every just defence. And for- asmuch as this alone is the only key to so much power on either side ; and as those who suffer themselves to be overcome by the lust of empire, exert their entire energies to this object ; it is neces- sary for you to be on your guard, who have now for so many years, by the blessing of this union, been in the enjoyment of that liberty which your forefathers conquered for you by their valour, and which these haughty despots envy you beyond measure. If you would enjoy this in perpetuity, and transmit it as an inherit- ance to your posterity, rather than, like slaves, live in a bondage devoid of Hberty, you must be on your guard against the first attack, and not think of listening for a moment to insidious and enticing promises, as bearing in mind that many more have been deceived and undone by the craftiness of the fox than have ever been conquered by force of arms. And rest assured, that the pre- tence of ancient treaties, the shew of long-continued friendship, the tender of good offices, may be held out as a guise ; but that there are no enmities more dangerous and more destructive than those which are concealed under the pretence of friendship. And although in all human estimation the city and territory of Geneva may be regarded as an object of not much value or im- portance, just as Corinth of old was by the Acha)ans, Chalcis bv the Eubceans, and Demetrias by the Thessalians ; yet as they were made the fetters of all Greece, so it is to be feared that the Gene- vcse, when subjugated by the Spanish Savoyard, shall prove in like sort the fetters of your whole confederate nation. Compare only the nature of the country, the spirit and daring of the enemy, his very power unwieldy through its excess, with your own narrow resources ; and judge whether it be credible, that he who envies the majesty of the French king, he who has for more than twenty years been fighting against the liberties of the Low-Countries, lie who has a design against the sovereignty of France, and is parched up with thirsting after the crown of England, is it to be bcUeved 542 QUEEN ELIZABETH TO THE CANTONS OF SWITZERLAND. [lETj that he will ever rest as long as jour own ancient rights, and laws, and liberty remain unsubverted ? Which in proportion as it would be a more dreadful spectacle to yourselves, and a more painful one to us, we again and again advise and entreat you to be forearmed and on your guard, lest such an event should occur ; so that, mutually congratulating yourselves on the preservation of your ancient dignity and independence, you may be a comfort to your friends, a protection to your neighbours, and an everlasting benefit to posterity. Ourself, though a woman, has taken the lead in this contest, preferring as we do to our own ease, dignity, kingly posses- sions, to whatever in short we hold or can hold most dear, the liberty of the neighbouring nations, and the preserving in their integrity the just rights and authority of others. We are placed and appointed of God for this very purpose, that as far as lieth in us we should do violence to none, but avert it from all, as being well aware, that he who, having the ability, useth it not for another's help, is as much to blame as though he were that other's destroyer. But you of your prudence know these things right well ; and of your friendly inchnation, good will, and pious zeal towards each other, are sufficiently ready to succour the oppressed, as to make due provision for your own safety. Wherefore we forbear adding more, save only that, for the sake of the piety which you exhibit towards God and man, we commend to you and to your good faith the battered remnant of your severely besieged countrymen : and may the God of salvation evermore bless and prosper you ! Given at our court at Greenwich, the 18th of July, in the year of our Lord 1590, and in the thirty-second year of our reign. Elizabeth R. CCXXXVIII. THE MINISTERS OF THE DUTCH CHURCH IN LONDON TO THE LORD TREASURER. [B. 134.] London, [about April 16, lofll.J The ministers and elders of the Dutch church in London suppliantly set forth that they have lately received letters from Dantzic' from their brethren who fled from Flanders, by which they understand that the church sojourning in those parts is unable to hold their meetings and godly exercises without difficulty and danger, by reason of some of the inhabitants who are hostile to [1 See Loscheri Motus Relig.] CCXXXVIII.] MINISTERS OF THE DUTCH CHURCH TO THE LORD TREASURER. 543 relio;Ion, and who have not hesitated from time to time to disturb the meetings of the foreigners and accuse them of sedition. But since the aforesaid foreigners, who require the free and open ex- ercise of rehgion in their own language, are aware that a suitable place either within or without the city will not readily be afforded them by the magistrates, unless the authority of some person of influence, and especially of the king of Poland, who is the protector of that state, be exerted in their behalf ; they humbly request that her most serene majesty, in addition to her other benefits conferred upon that kingdom, will, with her wonted benevolence towards all godly and oppressed strangers, compassionately obtain from his majesty, the king of Poland, some favour in this respect also to the Flemish strangers. Whence they will not only be bound to offer their constant prayers to God for the long life and prosperous reign of her royal majesty, but also to shew their gratitude by rendering to this kingdom and the united provinces their faithful duty and service, in diligently giving such information as they may obtain respecting the attempts and designs of the Spaniards, or any other enemy. Your most honoured lordship's devoted. The ministers and elders of the Dutch church in London. CCXXXIX. QUEEN ELIZABETH TO THE KING OF POLAND. [B. 135.] Greenwich, April IC, 1591. Elizabeth, by the grace of God, of England, France, and Ireland, queen, defender of the faith, &c. To the most serene prince and lord Sigismund, by the grace of God, king of Poland, grand duke of Lithuania, our very dear brother and cousin. We do not doubt but that your serene highness, and all other princes of Christendom, well understand in what manner we have been induced to succour the states of Lower Germany, now almost entirely overwhelmed by the tyranny of the Spaniards ; since we were previously unable by our frequent embassies and intercessions both with Spain and the governors of the Low Countries to obtain for them any equitable conditions of peace. And there are three motives which have especially induced us to do this; first, the cause of the more pure religion which they professed in common with ourselves ; next, the ancient rights of commerce and aUiance with a neighbouring nation ; and lastly, the numerous and manifest tokens which shewed that the same enemies would turn their arms 544 QUEEX ELIZABETH TO THE KING OF POLAND. [lET* against us and other princes professing the same religion, that they might extend the bounds of a monarchy which they unjustly claim. It has thus come to pass that many inhabitants of those regions have been compelled to migrate into different provinces, and, among the rest, into some of the cities in Prussia, subject to your serene highness ; in which many of them are now afraid, lest by reason of some difference in certain articles of religion, they may not be allowed the enjoyment of such immunity and free exercise of their religion as shall be suitable to their language and the former rites in which they have heretofore been instructed. And since we are informed that these Flemish, who are dwelling either in the city of Dantzic or in other sea-ports of Prussia, are not of that class of men who seek to overturn the lawful government and introduce anarchy, or who profess any heretical or impious error ; we could not but, with our wonted affection towards the whole nation, com- mend them to your serene highness ; entreating your serene high- ness, that, as it is plainly a royal act to deserve well of those who have been driven into exile from causes so honourable, your serene highness will exercise your authority in interceding with the ma- gistrates of Dantzic, and others, if need be, that those parties who have migrated thither from Flanders may continue among them, without any difficulty or danger of this kind, the assemblies of the reformed rehgion, as they have been accustomed to do in their own country, and as they were for some time allowed in those cities ; and that you will not suffer any injury to be done them, so long as they shall conduct themselves properly. For it cannot be either useful or honourable to your serene highness, or to the cities themselves, to drive away strangers, and deny them the rights of hospitality, by reason of the evil disposition of certain individuals. Wherefore we earnestly request your serene highness to confer this benefit upon them for our sake, which we shall accept as a mark of the greatest kindness on the part of your serene highness, which we will repay in our turn to those who may be commended to us by your serene highness, whenever any opportunity shall present itself; and so we pray God for every happiness to your serene highness and your kingdom. From our court at Greenwich, April 16, 1591. [Elizabeth R.] CCXL.] LORD STAFFORD TO 'JVOLFGANG MEIER, 545 CCXL. LORD STAFFORD TO WOLFGANG MEIER. [B. 136.] Greenwich, Aug. 6, 1593. IVIaster Meier \ I would willingly do what I can for jou, and have done what I could ; and the seniors of the college have with great alacrity most wilhngly allowed you fellow's commons. For your hvery and books I have given an order in the queen's name to the most learned and illustrious master doctor Nevill, to give you ten pounds sterHng a year, of which you will doubtless receive a portion every quarter. As to a chamber, they will, if possible, provide one for you, although it is a thing unheard of to allow to foreigners what is appropriated by the founders to our own country- men. I therefore advise you, if they offer one, to receive it most gratefully : if they are unable to provide one, you need not much complain; for this also is true, that if you have a chamber, you must purchase a bed and other furniture, and I think that it will not either be useful or necessary for you to go to that expense for only one or two yeai's ; and it will cost you less to hire a small lodging near the college, than to spend your money upon those things which, when you wish to return to your country, you will not be able to sell for half their value. So farewell, and may God preserve you in safety ! Greenwich, Aug. 6, 1593. Your very loving, E. Stafford. CCXLL THE STATE OF ZURICH TO QUEEN ELIZABETH. [B. 137.] Zurich, Aug. 12, 1600. To the most serene and mighty, the lady Ehzabeth, of England, France, Ireland, and the surrounding Islands, queen, defender of the christian faith, our most benign mistress, greeting. The laud- [1 Wolfgang Meier, of Basle, was born in 1577, and after a diligent pur- suit of his studies at home, camo to England, where he was received with great kindness, and in considei'ation of the merits of his grandfather Buccr, was supported in the university of Cambridge, at the expense of queen Elizabeth. Having there distinguished himself in sound learning, he returned homo through Frunt-e, and eventually succeeded his father in his chm-ch at Basle. He became a public lecturer, and afterwards ordinary professor of theology, a.d. 1611 ; and was sent to the synod of Dort in 1618. lie died in 1653. Sec Hoffman's Lexicon Universale.] 35 5i6 THE STATE OF ZURICH TO QUEEN ELIZABETH. [lET. able and pious zeal, with which, most mighty queen, your most serene majesty has hitherto encouraged and favoured all foreigners studious of true godliness and of useful learning, and especially those who go over from our city to your majesty's famous uni- versities, induces us, by reason of that most intimate connexion that exists between us in Christ, to present without hesitation this letter to your royal majesty, and afford you a fresh opportunity of mani- festing the like regard. And we entreat your majesty to receive it with favour, as we confidently trust you will do. Our beloved fellow-citizen Caspar Thoman\ the bearer of this letter, has appeared before us, and, as he is inflamed with an ardent longing , and desire of visiting your majesty's most flourishing uni- versities of Oxford and Cambridge, and of pursuing his studies in some one of their colleges, if only he can obtain that favour from your kindness, he has humbly requested us to give him a recom- mendation to your most serene majesty, for the advancement of this laudable design, and which he himself doubts not will have very great weight with your majesty. Having taken into consideration therefore his laudable petition, and having also ascertained that from the time Avhen, first dedicated to the Muses, he began to attend our schools, he always reverently and dutifully conducted himself towards his teachers, lived well and soberly, and both at home and abroad, namely, at Geneva and Mont- pelier, diligently employed himself in the pursuit of useful learning and the liberal arts, by reason of which good qualities he was deservedly dear to all good men ; we were unwilling to refuse com- pliance with his request. Wherefore, O queen, we so entirely commend to your serene majesty this excellent young man, now journeying into England, that we cannot possibly commend him with greater care, zeal, and diligence ; to the end that he may be enabled to pursue the praise- worthy course of his studies in your majesty's most illustrious [1 Caspar Thoman or Toman, one of the pastors or teachers of the schools at Zurich, (of which city his grandfather by the male line had borne the office of pra?tor,) having been recommended by the professors, teachers, and ministers of the church and school there, to live among, and receive an exhibition from, the Oxonians, a.d. 1599, did spend several years there, and occurs one of the first persons that was entered a student in the public libraiy, when first opened for use. He was a learned man, and read a lcctm*e in the university ; but, his education having been mostly at Geneva, did with other strangers of the like breeding so corrupt the students with their Calvinistical doctrine, that it was many years before it could be rooted out. Wood's Athen. Oxon. Ed. 1691, Vol. i. 786.] CCXLI.] THE STATE OF ZURICH TO QUEEN ELIZABETH. 547 universities, and (if it can be done with propriety) in one of their colleges, to the honour and advantage of our country, and of that church of which we are respectively members most intimately con- nected with each other. Should our Thoman be graciously favoured by your most serene majesty with this indulgence, it will not only be most gratifying to us, but we will omit no opportunity of returning it. We should have written more fully upon this subject, only that we should thereby have appeared to doubt the kindness and good- will of your most serene majesty towards us, of wliich you have hitherto afforded such illustrious manifestations. It only remains therefore that we pray and shall continue to pray God, that upon your most serene majesty, the most honour- able nursing mother of the orthodox church, and most pious defender of the true faith, he will bestow every good, defend you from every evil, and especially from the arts of antichrist, and continue to bless your godly counsels, to the advancement of the glory of his name, and the maintenance of the security of that church of which the most flourishing kingdom of England is as it were the true Sarepta of this our age. Amen. Written in our city, and confirmed by our usual seal. August 12, in the year of the last long-suffering of God 1600. The Provost and Council of the State of Zurich. CCXLII. C. THOMAN TO C. WASER^, [B. 138.J Oxford, Feb. 1601. Praise to God for evermore ! In the year of the Saviour, 1601. February. When I recall, my reverend patron, from time to time, with a most agreeable remembrance of them, the magni- tude and extent of your favours, and acknowledge my too limited ability to return your kindness ; I easily perceive that for such great deservings on your part I am unable to return any thanks, but that I do thank you in a very small degree, while I am in- debted to you in the greatest. Since this is the case, I am under no slight apprehension lest you should think that I have not only [2 Caspar Waser was a minister at Zurich, and professor of Hebrew there in 1696. Ho married a daughter of Josiah Simler. In 1607 he was made a canon of Zurich, and professor of Greek, and in 1611 was appointed to tho chair of theology. He died in 1625. Moreri.] 35—2 548 C. THOMAN TO C. WASER. [LET. let slip the remembrance of these things, but that also every thouo'ht about them has for ever escaped my memory ; especially as so many days and months have passed since you have received any letter from me, by which I might at least testify my grateful inclination, though without the power of shewing my gratitude. But I hope that when you know the cause of my long silence, you will hold me excused. You must know, first of all, my reverend patron, that I am in good health. I should be exceedingly glad to hear the hke account of yourself. I will shortly state the situation in which my affairs are placed. When I arrived at Dieppe, I inquired after a vessel, and having met with one, I put out to sea, and reached Dover with a fair wind : from thence I proceeded straight to London, and there delivered your letter of recommendation to master CastolP, by Avhom I was courteously received. I then waited on the earl of llutland", who also read your letter, and promised me for your sake every assistance : he told me, however, that he did not think that foreiirners were admissible into our colleges, but he wrote to the queen's physician to advance my business at court. On the 7th of October I went to court, and meeting the physician as he was walking up and down before the palace, I gave him the earl's letter. When he had read it, he told me just as the earl had done, namely, that there were no colleges in which foreigners could be admitted. When I heard this, I lost all hope, I then waited upon Robert Cecil", the principal secretary of England, (for every thing, as you know, intended for the queen passes through his hands,) with a petition that he would deign to present to the queen's majesty the letter of the senate of Zurich, This he promised to do, and I Avaited some days at court in the hope of soon receiving an answer. But when this did not arrive, I again called upon the secretary, an arrogant little fellow* enough, to request him to intercede for me with the queen's majesty, that I might the more speedily obtain an [1 John Castoll was the minister of the French reformed chm'ch in Lon- don, "a discreet and learned man." Strype, Whitgift, ii. 109.] [2 Roger, fifth earl of Rutland, married the daughter of su- Philip Sidney. He died in 1612.] [3 Sir Robert Cecil, the second son of lord Burghley, was lord privy seal and secretary of state in 1596, and on the accession of James I., he was created, 1603, Baron Cecil of Essingdon, in 1604 viscount Cranbourne, and in 1605 earl of Salisbury. He died in 1612 on his road from Bath; observ- ing to Sir Walter Cope, "Ease and pleasure quake to hear of death ; but my life, full of cares and miseries, desireth to be dissolved."] [' Sir Robert Cecil was somewhat deformed in his person.] CCXLII,] C. THOMAX TO C. WASER. 549 answer. He at length told me to call again on the 15th of October, when he Avould give me the queen's answer. When therefore I returned to him on the day appointed, he harshly ad- dressed me in this way, What do you want? I replied, The convenience of pursuing my studies in some college by the favour and liberality of the queen's majesty. He then said, What claims of merit do you possess, that you presume to make such a request ? You do not know, he said, the constitution of this kingdom. The queen has read your letter ; she will not do any thing thereupon : this was his official reply. Seeing myself disappointed of my hope, I took a journey to London, to complain to master Castoll, Avho con- doled with me on the harsh conduct of the secretary. Meanwhile master James Meadows^, doctor in divinity, a man illustrious both by nobility and learning, had heard that some persons from Zurich had lately arrived in London : he therefore sought us out with all diligence, and after having made a long search in all parts of the city, he found us out, and told us how exceedingly he was gratified by our coming. He gave Eppentianus and Werdmuller, who did not choose to remain in England any longer, money for their tra- velling expenses. I have not heard any thing from them since they returned to France. After their departure, doctor Meadows re- ceived me into his house, where I awaited the arrival of master Hungerford". In the meantime, with the aid of doctor Meadows, I visited every thing in London that was worth seeing. Hungerford came to London on the 24th of October : as soon as I knew it, I waited upon him with doctor Meadows ; but he no longer recognized me : as soon, however, as I told him who I was, he embraced me with both arms. I then related to him the reason of my coming, and what had occurred to me at court. When he was made acquainted with the facts, he was moved with compassion, and comforted me, and begged me not to be cast down, for that in [5 James Meddows or Medowes, D.D. in the university of Basle, was a Cheshire man, born, and had formerly studied arts and divinity at Heidel- berg. He was in IGIO chaplain to Peregrine lord Willonghby, and after- wards to king James I. He translated from High Dutch into English a sermon preached before Frederick V. prince Elector Palatine and the princess Elizabeth, by Abraham Scultetus on Ps. 147. Lond. 1613. See Wood's Ath. Oxon. I. 809.] ['' Anthony Hungerford, son of Anthony Hungerford of Do^\Tie Ampney in Gloucestershire, was a Roman Catholic till 1588. He took the degree of M.A. in 1594, was knighted in 1607, and died 1627. Wood, as above, p. 436.] 550 C. THOMAN TO C. WASER. \j'^^'^- conjunction with doctor Meadows he would provide for me in ano- ther way. On the 30th of October I was forced to borrow from master Castoll twelve French crowns for my necessary expenses. While master Hungerford and doctor Meadows were deliberating about me, I fell into a most severe illness, in which doctor Meadows and his wife bestowed much kindness upon me, just as though I had been their own son. Christophel Schweitzer also came to see me at great expense. When God had restored my former health, masters Hungerford, Meadows, and Castoll determined among themselves that I should go to Oxford ; for that the letter from the church at Zurich would probably have some weight there. On the 13th of December I again had recourse to master Castoll in great distress, imploring his assistance in lending me four French crowns more. My illness cost me more money than I wished, so that I have now received from him sixteen crowns. I promised him, and confirmed it with my own signature, that I would repay it through you, my reverend patron, to Wolf at Frankfort. I have also fully written to my mother about this matter, and I earnestly request you, my reverend patron, to endeavour that master Castoll may receive the money he lent me, at the first opportunity ; and that this may more easily be accomplished, I have been thinking about the exhibition of Funckius, which is at the disposal of my cousin Henry Thoman to bestow upon whomsoever he pleases. If I can obtain that, master Castoll can be paid with less inconvenience. On the 14tli of December I left London for Oxford, being supplied with letters of recommendation by masters Hungerford and Meadows. As soon as I arrived in Oxford, I dehvered my private letter, and then the public one, to master Thomas Thornton ^ who is now vice-chancellor ; and who, when he saw by whom the letter was written, expressed his gratification at receiving a letter from the fomous church of Zurich, and moreover expressed his concern [1 July 12, 1583. Thomas Thornton, vice-chancellor of this university, canon of Christ Church, Worcester and Hereford, of which last place he was also chaunter, and about this time master of Ledbury Hospital in Here- fordshire, was actually created D.D. He died Apr. 15, 1629, aged 88, and was buried in the parish chui'ch of Ledbuiy, where it is stated on his monument that he was born at Harrow on the Hill in Middlesex, that he Avas purioris Latini sermo)iis author primarius, that he was a benefactor to the poor people of Ledbury hospital, that he was a common refuge for young poor scholars of great hopes and parts, and tutor to sir Philip Sidney when he was at Christ Church. To which Wood adds, that he was also tutor to the learned WilliamCamden,Clarencieux King of arms. See Wood's Athen. Ox. i. 754.] CCXLII.] C. THOMAN TO C. WASER. 551 at not being able to assemble the university at that time ; for that they Avere engaged in business of the greatest importance. I have been awaiting the reply of the university, and am expecting it up to this present day ; for the vice-chancellor will give me an answer this week. I cannot be admitted into any college, but yet I think I shall obtain an honorary stipend^. But should I not receive any liberal assistance from the university, I shall return to London ; for there is a certain nobleman there who is very anxious for me to instruct his sons. I certainly experience the greatest kindness here from I)r Rainolds, the Phcenix of England. I pray you, if you think fit, to write to the following individuals, and thank them for their favours to me ; masters Hungerford, Meadows, Castoll, Thomas Thornton, Rainolds, who is shortly about to pubhsh his most learned works, and master Christophel Schweitzer. It now remains for me to entreat that your dignity will at all times regard me with paternal love. I will take care that your dignity shall ever find me most grateful. Written in haste, at Oxford. Your dignity's most devoted, Caspar Thoman. CCXLIII. J. JOHNSTON^ TO C. WASER. [B. 139.] St Axdkew's, in Scotland, Aug. I, 1601. Greeting. Your letter, my very learned and dear friend Waser, written on the 20th of last March, I received on the 20th of July ; and I am the more obliged to you for it, as I had not sent you a letter at the fiiir preceding. The reason of this was a most severe attack of splenitis, owing to which my immediate death was expected by every one. And the Lord had given me this dis- [2 John Castoll writes to Waser, Feb. 11, 1600. " Since I wrote the aboye letter to you, doctor Gentile, the professor of Civil Law at Oxford, has informed me that the university has decreed, at a public meeting, to master Thoman a yearly stipend of twenty pounds."] [■■' John Johnston was a native of Aberdeenshire : he studied for some years at the most celebrated universities on the continent, where ho gained the friendship of the chief learned men. After some residence in England he returned to his native country, well reputed as a scholar, a jioet, and a divine. Melville never ceased till he procured him to be associated in tho work of theological instruction in the university of St Andrew's, where he was appointed professor of divinity in 1593. He died in October, 1611,] 552 J. JOHNSTON TO C. WASER. [lET. position, that I was willing to depart. But my most merciful God has decreed it otherwise, and after tliis very severe winter has afforded me a farther breathing-time ; but I cannot tell how long it may last. May the Lord grant that I may employ the remainder of this miserable life to the glory of his name ! Our country, by the divine blessing, is in the enjoyment of perfect tranquillity. After a most severe winter, such as was never known before, there succeeded a milder summer, whence there has arisen a better hope for the autumn, and a reduction in the price of wheat. Her most serene majesty brought forth her little son Charles^ on the 19th of last November. Prince Henry ^, who is flourishing, by God's blessing, both in mind and body, is educated with the greatest care at Stirhng. His most serene majesty is now sojourning at Falkland in this neighbourhood. On the 12th of May last in the general assembly the solemn covenant^ with God was renewed by the most serene king in person, and the congregation of the whole church, respecting the advancement of the pure worship of God, the extirpation of popery, the rendering obedience agree- ably to the law of God according to the calling of each individual, that piety and justice may flourish together. And certainly from that time the law has been strictly enforced against offenders. A certain notorious papist, son of the laird of Bondson* near Mont- [1 Prince Charles, afterwards king Charles I. was bora at Dunfennline, Nov. 19, 1600.] [2 Hem-y, the eldest son of James I. was at this time about six years old. He was a youth of excellent promise, and died Nov. 6, 1613, to the universal grief of the English nation.] [3 The general assembly met at Burntisland in May 1601. The conduct of James I. on this occasion is thus noticed by the writers of the time : " The king, as I heard, made a comfortable confession of his sins and his faith, and promised most weightily and solemnly to abhor all papistry, idolatry, and superstition, and to live and die in the true religion wherein he was brought up, and which was preached and professed within his realm of Scotland presently ; also to execute justice and to do all duties of a godly and a christian king, better than ever before." Autobiography and Diary of Mr James Melville, Wodrow Society's edit. p. 494. See also M'Crie's Life of A. MelviUe, Vol. ii. p. 173, 4.] [4 This name is incorrectly stated in the MS. It should have been written Bonytoun, of whom the following account is extracted from Calderwood's MS. Church History in the British Museum : " In the beginning of March [1601] mass was said in Edinburgh, in Andrew Naper's house, in Helene Sempill's chamber, at sundry times, by Mr Alexander Mackquhirrie. A little before this time, the young laird of Bonytoun and laird of Latoun, with their complices, brake up the old laird uf Bonytoun's house in Angus, and took CCXLIII.] J. JOHNSTON TO C. WASER. 5oo rose, was executed in the month of May for a most atrocious crime committed against his parents. Blessed be God, and may he give us grace both to will and to do well ! John Erskine^ together with Edward Bruce of Kinloss, having discharged a most honourable embassy to the English, shortly after the decease of the earl of Essex ^ so much lamented by all good men, and calamitous to the whole island, on his return appeared to renounce all cheerfulness. The rivalry of secretary Robert Cecil" is said to have injured Essex much more than the crimes laid to his charge. Affau^s are now quiet, but it is to be feared lest the mass of discontent at the death of Essex and other noblemen should break out into open violence. The lord Lewis Stuart*, of royal blood, duke of Leven, embarked on the tenth of July on his way to France as ambassador with a noble and sj)lcndid retinue, to confirm the ancient and hitherto un- violated alhance between the two nations ; and to congratulate the king of the French upon his kingdom being confirmed to him, upon his victories, and his late marriage. These are the ostensible away all the evidences and other plenishing belonging to old Bonytoun, father to the said Bonytoun the younger ; and within five or six days after resorted openly to Edinburgh, and were at the mass aforesaid. Bonytoun the younger and Latoun were apprehended, put in M-ard, presented to an inquest, and accused criminally for the said theft allaverlie [only]; were convicted thereof, and consequently of treason, and the doom given out upon them to be executed. — ^Upon Monday the 27th of April the laird of Bonytoun was beheaded at the cross of Edinburgh, betwixt six and seven in the morning, by a commission from the king directed to the bailiffs of Edinburgh, timeously in the morning ; for howbeit great intercession was made by Huntley, Errol, Hume, and others, yet the ministers were instant with the king to have a proof of his sincerity. He died an obstinate papist, ever looking for pardon till the last gasp. He pretended he suffered for the catholic Roman religion, but it was no point of his dittay. Only the stealing of his father's evidences and writs was laid to his charge."] [^ As soon as James heard of Essex's ill success, he appointed the earl of Mar, and Bruce, abbot of Kinloss, to repair as his ambassadors to the court of England. The former of these was the person by whose means Essex had carried on his correspondence Avith the king.] [6 The earl of Essex was beheaded in the Tower, Feb. 25, 1601.] [7 The behaviom- of sir Robert Cecil on Essex's trial is related in Camden, Eliz. G17. The French ambassador, Boissise, describes in a letter of March 26, 1601, how Essex and Cecil contended for the first place in the favour of Elizabeth. Raumer, 16th cent. ii. 174. An account of the two factions is given in Robertson, Hist. Scotland, in. 161.] [8 In July 1601, Lodowick, duke of Lennox, was sent in an ambassage to France rather for confirming the old amity and friendship than for any business else. Spotswood, Hist, of Church of Scotland, p. 465.] 554 J. JOHNSTON TO C. WASER. [lET. grounds; the secret ones are not made known. Masters Melvin^ Murray, Moniepennie^, and your other friends are all well by God's blessing, and lovingly salute yourself and Howe, I most affec- tionately and dutifully salute all the pastors and professors, your most learned colleagues, whom I pray you to call upon individually, together with master Stuckius^, my friend Simler, and Erne. jMost devoted as I am to you and your honourable city, I pray for you every happiness from God. I request you dutifully to salute for me by letter master Benedict Erlach the father, and Wolfgang his son, my pupil, together with the whole family. Illness has pre- vented my writing. Continue to refresh us all by writing on the state of your aifairs and those of the Genevese and the neighbour- ing churches. Farewell, all of you, most happily. St Andrew's, in Scotland, Aug. 1, 1601. Yours Avholly, John Johnston. CCXLIV. J. JOHNSTON TO C. WASER. [B. 140.] St Andrew's, in Scotland, Feb. 8, 1G02. Greeting. At the end of last July, most excellent Waser, I prepared a letter to you, which I thought I had sent in time to be forwarded to Frankfort by the September fair ; but our friend Hart has since informed me that it was not sent thither in time, owing to the loitering of the bearers. I am, never- theless, surprised that your usual practice of so lovingly writing to me and your old friends in this neighbourhood, and which has always given the greatest pleasure to us all, was interrupted at the late fair. We therefore all of us entreat you constantly to continue to refresh us wnth the most agreeable gales breathing from your snowy Alps as far as ourselves. Even the shortest letter from you ■will dehght us exceedingly. As to myself, you may be assured that as long as I have life and health, I will send a letter to you every fair. At present, however, want of time will excuse a brevity which is also imposed upon me by my state of health, which has [1 Andrew Melville is doubtless here intended.] [2 David Moniepennie was dean of Faculty at St Andrew's, and one of the high commission named in IGIO.] [3 John William Stuckius was the author of a treatise on the festivals of the ancients, and their sacrifices. He also wrote a commentary upon Arrian. See Melchior Adam.] CCXLIV.] J. JOHNSTON TO C. WASER. 555 for some days been rather unfavourable, in consequence of the return of that disease of the spleen which had almost killed me last year, and which, as far as I can see, my brother, will by degrees carry me off, or rather lead me away ; for I shall most willingly and readily follow the guidance of my most merciful God, who very lately, on the 20th of December, has sent before me your acquaintance, Thomas Cargill, the schoolmaster of Aberdeen, and that too at a time when he was in excellent health. And it will not perhaps be long before I follow him. Meanwhile the Lord renews my hope of a better life, and has also renewed my hope of a longer life in this Avorld, by having given me another little son, Edward, on the 15th of January. And about the same time, namely, on the 18th of January, a third son, who is not yet named, was born to our most serene king. The princes Henry and Charles, with the princess Elizabeth, are by God's blessing alive and well. We are, by God's blessing, in the enjoyment of peace both in church and state. But the plague is threatening us very sadly. For it has begun to shew itself at Edinburgh, and Glasgow, and Crail, a town about six miles from hence. England is at this time very much refreshed by the defeat of the whole Spanish army* in Ireland, by the mercy of God, and the valour of lord Mountjoy. The Spanish had formed a conspiracy in Ireland with the earl of Tyrone, an Irish rebel, and had been meditating to bring the war into England from the opposite coast. But the Lord dissipated these designs. Certain intelHgence of this has, within these few days, been sent to our most serene king, and thanksgiving was pub- licly made in the churches. With respect to French, and Spanish, and Flemish news, you are better informed than we are. The blockade of Ostend is con- tinued, as it were by miracle, through the whole of this winter, nor have the enemy much hope of reducing it ; for the English chiefly, together with some Scots and French, under colonel sir Francis Vere^, a most valiant knight, are holding it for the Flemish. All your friends here, to whom I communicate your letters, entreat you, as I also do, to continue to give us information as to your own affairs, and those of the Gencvcse. They bear you in their remem- [4 This army consisted of four thousand men, under the command of Don Juan D'Aguilar. They hmded at Kinsale, Sept. 21, and Avere joined by the earl of Tyrone and others some days after. The united forces were defeated by lord Mountjoy, on the 21st of December, with tlic loss of twelve hundred men. Camden, 043 ; Lingard, 398.] p An account of this siege is given by Camden, Kliz. 633, Sec] 556 J. JOHNSTON TO C. WASER. [lET. CCXLIV.] brance, and most affectionately salute you, namely, the Melvins, Moniepennie, Blake, Murray, and the rest. I beg "my dutiful and affectionate respects to masters Stuckius, Zuingle, Lavater, and your worthy colleagues, especially to my dear friends, masters Simler and Erne, to whom with yourself, vour wife, and her father, I wish everlasting happiness. St Andrew's, in Scotland, Feb. 8, 1602. Yours wholly, John Johnston. INDEX. A. Abdias, 207. Abel, John, 18, 197, 319; death of, 327- Acworth, George, public orator at Cam- bridge, makes an oration in honour of Bucer and Fagius, 114 n; answers Saunders' book, 418 n. Acontius, 18, 102. Adiaphoristic controversy, 232 n. Admonition to the Parliament ; a book circulated by the puritans against the church of England, 421 ?«, 452 n ; an- swered by Whitgift, 434 «, 441 n; proclamation against it, 4G7 «• Advertisements of the bishops, book of, 281 ,1, 304. Agrarian laws, 457- Agricola, John, of Eisleben, assisted in drawing up the Interim, 232 n. Aguilar, Don Juan d', defeat of in Ire- land, 555 u. Aide, the, one of sir Martin Frobisher's ships so called, 513 n. Aldegonde, Mont St, Philip, lord of, 511. Alen, Francis, llGn. Alenyon, Francis, duke d', 524. Alexander, Peter, of Aries, 102 n, 107. Allen, Edmund, designed for bishop of Rochester, 55 ; his death, G2 n. Altars, removal of from churches, 79. Alt-Sax, or Hohensaxe, Philip, baron of, 422 II ; testimonial of, 423. Alva, John, duke of, 30(J ; puts to death counts Egmont and Horn, 31G ; defeated at Groningen, 317; his cruelty, 323; arrests the English at Antwerp, 324 ; recalled, 411. Ambarvalia, 85 m. Ambassador, Spanish, ordered to quit Eng- land, 398. Ambrosius of Duisberg, 89. Amphilochius, 207. Anabaptists, 390. Anacletus, 207. Andelot, Sieurd', 249 m. Andernach, 114. Andreas, James, professor at Tubingen, head of the Ubiquitarians in Germany, 179 «, 180m, 456«. Andrew's, St, archbishop of, 17G n, 292, 383. Angus, earl of, 201 n. Anhalt, Wolfgang, prince of, 20 n. Anicetus, bishop of Rome, 3G8 n. Anjou, Francis, duke of, a suitor to queen Elizabeth, 531 n ; arrives privately in England, 528 )(. Anjou, Henry, duke of, afterwards Henry III. of France, suitor to queen Eliza- beth, 357 ; besieges Rochelle, 432 n ; elected king of Poland, ib. ; anecdote respecting him, 4G2 « ; succeeds to the throne of France, 502 n. Anselm, 519. Antholm's, St, new service used at, 41 n. Anthonius, one of the ministers in the Dutch church at Norwich, 362 «; si- lenced, 398. Antididagma, 44. Antoninus Pius, 3G8 n. Antwerp, 185, 344 ; tumult at, 252 ; trade re-established with, 198. Arau, exiles at, request leave to depart, G. Argyle, earl of, 209 «, 292 «. Argyle, countess of, present at the chris- tening of James I., 284 ii. Aristotle quoted, 500. Armuyden, laid waste by the Walloon troops, 410. Arnheim, 185. Arran, James Hamilton, tliird earl of, escapes from France, ^0 n ; a suitor of queen Elizabeth, 42 ii. Arras, Anthony Perrenot, bishop of, and cardinal of Granvelle, 195 7i. Arrian, 153. Arsacius, bishop, 219 n. Arschot, duke d', 512 n. 558 INDEX. Articles drawn up by the Puritans, 417, 439. Arundel, Henry Fitzalan, earl of, 300 n ; one of queen Elizabeth's privy council, 5 )i ; one of her suitors, 42 n. Ascham, Roger, 132; letters of, 131, 163. Assembly, general, of Scotland, its pro- ceedings, 310. Athanasius, supposititious works of, 207. Athol, earl of, 292 «. Auerstadt, bishop of, 137- Augsburgh, confession of, 20 ii, 192; con- futation of, 182 H ; apology for, ib. Augustine, referred to, 277 "i "144 7J, 446 n. Augustus, elector of Saxony, 180 7i ; sum- mons the convocation at Thorgau, 486 n. Austria, Charles, archduke of, suitor to queen Elizabeth, 201. Austria, don John of, 521 ; death of, 522 «. Aylmer, John, successively archdeacon of Stow and Lincoln, and bishop of Lon- don, one of the disputants at the West- minster conference, 23 ; answers Knox and Goodman, 76 ii. B. Bacon, sir Nicholas, lord keeper of the great seal, 5 h, 27 n, 37, 249 ; president at the Westminster conference, 27 «. Baden, margrave of, 363. Baden, Cecilia, margravine of, sister to the king of Sweden, visit of, to queen Eliza- beth, 363 «. Baine, Ralph, bishop of Lichfield and Coventry, 22 u ; on the papist side at the Westminster conference, 23 n ; death of, 87. Baldwin, Francis, professor of law at Bourges, 158 «, 298. Bale, John, bishop of Ossory, 144 n. Balkius, Isbrand, concerned in a dispute in the strangers' church at Norwich, 398 7t. Baltinglas, lord, rebellion of in Ireland, 532 «. Banosius, 515. Baptism by women, remarks on, 247, 281. Barlow, William, bishop of Chichester, 33. Barlow, W'illiam, son of the preceding, 426, 456 ; notice of, 485 n ; letters of, 482, 494. Barnard castle, 355 n. Barthelot, John, letter of, 279. Barwyk, Humphrey, condemned for trea- son, 172 71. Basil, St, quoted, 455 w. Basle, plague at, 194. Bath, Henry earl of, one of queen Mary's privy council, 5 n. Bath, queen Elizabeth visits, 480. Batori, Stephen, elected king of Poland, 502 H. Bavarian inquisition, articles of, replied to by Bollinger, 415. Beale, Robert, notice of, 514 n. Beaton, archbishop, 293 n. Beaufort, Mr de, a name assumed by the earl of Arran, 72 n. Beaumont, Robert, archdeacon of Hunting- don, and master of Trinity college, Cam- bridge, 295. Beddingfield, sir Henry, one of queen Mary's council, 5 n. Bedford, Francis Russel, second earl of, 1 1 H ; imprisoned in queen Jlary's time, 23 n ; one of queen Elizabeth's council, 5 n ; ambassador in Scotland, 284 71 ; governor of Berwick, 199; letters of, 82, 526. Behem, Theobald, 523. Belisarius, 30 n. Bellewes, sir W., 329 h. Bengal, bay of, 17 0. Bentham, Thomas, minister of a congre- gation in London in queen Mary's time, 17 n ; bishop of Lichfield and Coventry, 78, 301 71. Bergen, 524. Berkeley castle, visited by queen Elizabeth, 412 «. Bernardine. See Ochinus. Berners, executed for conspiracy, 397 n. Bernius, Nicolas, letter of, 488. Bernus, 508. Bertie, Richard, an exile for religion, 451 n. Berwick, 199. Beti, Fr., 18. Betta, Thaddeus, 471. Beza, Theodore, 479 ; letters of, 245, 293. Bible, ordered to be read in churches, 300 w; destroyed by rebels, 330 n. Bibliander, Theodore, a minister of Zurich, INDEX. 559 213 «, 224 ; his commentary on Genesis and Exodus, 213. Bill, Dr ^Villiam, afterwards master of St John's and Trinity colleges, and dean of Westminster, preacher at St Paul's cross on the queen's accession, 4«, 21 ra. Birchett, Peler, 471) «. Birkman, Arnold, 89, 102. Birrus, description of the, 219 w. Biscay, bay of, 149. Bishop, Thomas, executed at York, 338 n. Bishops, some lands of, exchanged for parsonages impropriate, 31, 84?«; au- thority of, in the church of England, 270 ; Gualter's remarks upon their office, 442 ; Sampson's remarks, 2. Blaarer, 175. Black, a Dominican friar, 241. Blackwall, 513 w. Blake, 555. Blaurer, Dithelm, 18G. Blondus, 23G. Bodley, Laurence, 495. Bodley, sir Thomas, 495 n. Boissise, the French ambassador in Eng- land, 553 n. Bolton castle, 325 n. Bonamy, Elias, 489. Bonamy, Peter, 489 11. Bonner, Edmund, bishop of London, 22n ; complaint of Ridley's executors against him, 10 ; confined as prisoner to his own house, 16 ; deprived of his see, 33 ; sent to prison, 103 w, 105. Bonytoun, laird of, 552 n. Borgest, secretary to the Spanish ambas- sador, 397 "• Borthwick castle, 293 n. Both well, Adam, bishop of Orkney, 292 »«. Bothwell, James Hepburn, earl of, sus- pected of the murder of lord Darnley, 292 ; marries the queen of Scots, ib. ; made duke of Orkney, ib. ; flight of, from Scodand, 295 m, 309; death of, 290. Bothwellhaugh, Hamilton of, 332 «. Bowes, sir George, 329 «, 354 n. Bowes, Richard, one of the royal visitors for the north, 97 "• Boxal, John, dean of Peterborough, Nor- wich, and Windsor, one of queen Mary's council, 5 n ; death of, 348, 361 ; notice of, 3G1 71. Brabant, affairs of, 306. Bradford, John, the martyr, a friend of Bucer, 141 n; addressed two letters to the earl of Bedford, 423 «. Brandenburgh, George, marquis of, 20 n. Brassius, Egbert, 185. Bread, unleavened, used at the Lord's supper, 85. Bremius, Martin, 44. Brentius, John, the patron of Ubiquitari- anism, 139 n, 169, 189 ; testament of, 350 )i, 380 ; Bullinger's controversy with, 318,350,352, 401 «. Brill, the, taken by the lord of Lumey, 410. Bristol, queen Elizabeth's progress to, 480«. Broadgate hall, now Pembroke college, 522. Brooke, Fulk Greville, lord, 515 11. Brooks, James, bishop of Gloucester, death of, 24 ; notice of, 24 n. Brouage, salt works of, 149 «. Brown, George, one of the royal visitors for the north, 97 n. Brown, sir John, one of queen Mary's council, 5 n. Bruce, abbot of Kinloss, 553 n. Bruerne, Richard, deprived of his profes- sorship, 24 n ; provost of Eton, has Peter ]\Iartyr's prebend, 81. Bruges, 185. Brussels, 185. Bucer, Martin, controversy with Yong, 43 ;j ; bones of taken up and burnt, 45 «, 114 ; his judgment respecting the habits, 227 ; and the book of common prayer, 387 n. Buchanan, George, writes verses in praise of queen Elizabeth, 155 7/ ; saying of the queen respecting him, 345 11 ; writes on behalf of the queen of Scots, 384 « ; and De jure regni, 530 /(. Bull, of pope Pius V., deposing queen Elizabeth, 335 11, 341 ; answered byBul- linger, 354, 380, 398; and Jewel, 350. BuUinger, Henry, his treatise on two natures in Christ, 39 ; against the ana- baptists, llO; his dispute with Brentius, 401 «; commentaries of, on Daniel and Isaiah, 202, 205 ; treatise of, on the 560 INDEX. Origin of error, 318, 323; and on councils, 331 ; extract of a letter of his to Utenhovius, 21 ?( ; treatise of, on scrip- ture and church authority, 399 ; homilies on the 130th and 133rd Psalms, 4G8 ; opinion of the habits, 265 ; attacked by the plague, 199 ; last illness and death of, 494 H, 49{> ; Decades of, 225 ; children of, 39 H, 199 «, 201, 206 «, 306 «, 364 ; letters of, 202, 214, 224, 253, 255, 256, 258, 290, 307, 457, 460. BuUinger, Dorothea, 364, 409, 470. Bullinger, Henry, the younger, 128. BuUinger, Rodolph, 38. Bungey, Cornelius, martyr, l\0 n. Burcher, John, 187- Buren, a, Daniel, 142. Burghley, lord, conspiracy against, 397" ; letter of, 412. Burntisland, meeting of the general as- sembly at, 552 ». Butler, Henry, 345, 363, 391 n, 397- Butler, John, 397. Butrech, notice of, 5\5 n. C. Caius, John, master and founder of Caius college, notice of, 40 71. Caius, Thomas, 501. Calabria, 462. Calais, 185 ; restitution of, demanded, 34. Calvin, John, 183; illness of, 174; charge of, against IMclanethon, 232 n ; works of, studied in England, 280 ; letter of, 76. Cambay, gulph of, 169. Camden, William, 550 n. Canterbury, archbishop of, legate to Henry VIII., 282. Cantons, Swiss, queen Elizabeth's letters to, 536, 540. Cargill, Thomas, 554. Careless, John, martyr, 110«. Carlisle, queen of Scots arrives at, 315. Carnotensis, Johannes, 2\4 n. Carrick, earl of, 284 ;;. Cartwright, Thomas, his admonition to the parliament, 452 ;/ ; escapes to Heidel- berg, 479 « ; character of, ib. Carvil, Nicholas, death of, 295 n. Cashel, archbishop of, retires to the con- tinent, 475 H. Casimir, John duke, 322 ; favours Cal- vinism, 298 « ; besieges Deventer, 520 11 ; visits England, 526 7(. Cassander, George, 158 n ; letter of, 91. Cassilis, earl of, 127 "• Castalio, Sebastian, account of his version of the bible, 484 n. Castle Hamilton, 315. Castoll, John, minister of the French church in London, 548 «. Ciiteau Cambresis, peace of, 44 n. Catechism, Heidelberg, 298n. Cathedral churches, state of, 60. Catherine, daughter of Philip II., 540 «. Catherine Parr, queen, 363. Cave, sir Ambrose, one of queen Eliza- beth's privy council, 5 n. Cawood, a residence belonging to the see of York, 381 «. Cecil, sir Robert, 548 n, 553. Cecil, sir William, secretary of state, 5 h, 15, 69, 112 H. See Burghley. Cecilia, margravine of Baden, 363 n. Celestine, 229. Centuriators of Magdeburgh, 143 h. Chalcedon, council of, referred to, 443 m. Chalcis, 541. Chambers, Richard, 80 ; notice of his death, 208 «. Chanting, objected to by the Puritans, 282. Charlemagne, 92 ; convokes a council at Frankfort, 214 n. Charles, archduke of Austria, suitor to queen Elizabeth, 42 «, 292. Charles Emanuel, duke of Savoy, 536 11, 540 n. Charles V., emperor, 20 h. Charles IX. of France, 164n, 502 «. Charles, prince, afterwards Charles I., 552«. Chatelherault, duke of, 309 11. Chatillon, cardinal de, poisoned at Canter- bury, 357 «. Chedsey, 'William, one of the disputants at the Westminster conference, 23 n. Cheke, sir John, 43;;, 136. Cheney, Richard, bishop of Gloucester, entertained Luther's opinions respecting the eucharist, 286 «. Cheney, sir Thomas, one of queen Eliza- beth's privy council, 5 7/. INDEX. 561 Chevalier, Antony, Hebrew professor at Cambridge, 386. Chiavenna, plague at, 191 n. Chilton, 345. Chobham, 347 n. Christopher, count Palatine, 462. Christopherson, John, bishop of Chichester, preaches at Paul's Cross, 5 n ; committed to prison, ib. ; his death, ib. Chrysostom, quoted, 236. Church-lands, alienation of, by queen Eli- zabeth, 31, 84 m. Church of England, state of, described, 269, &c. ; alleged abuses in, 417. Church, Dutch, in London, letter of, to the lord treasurer, 542. Church, French, in London, 116; relief afforded to, 426 n. Church, protestant, in London, in queen Mary's time, 17 «, 58. Cicero, quoted, 515 w. Clement, 207. Clergy, London, proceedings against, 280 n. Clergy, marriage of forbidden without con- sent of the bishop, 247 ; authorised by parliament, 300. Clerk, Bartholomew, afterwards dean of the Arches, answered Saunders' book De visibili monarchia, 4\tin. Cletus, 207. Cleve, rectory of, held by Parkhurst, 63 n, 75. Clifford Moor, rebels at, 354 n. Clinton, Edward, lord, one of queen Eli- zabeth's privy council, 5k; commands troops against the rebels in the north, 355 n. Clough, sir Richard, his account of Enib- den, 196 H ; letter of, 316. Clusius, 515. Coccius, Ulric, 179 ». Cochlaeus, writes against the confession of Augsburgh, 182 n. Coinage, base, called in by queen Elizabeth, 116«, 134. Cole, Henry, warden of New college, and dean of St Paul's, a disputant at the Westminster conference, 23 ii, 37. Cole, Thomas, archdeacon of Essex and Colchester, death of, 349, 362. Cole, William, president of Corpus Christi 36 college, Oxford, letters of, 430, 475, 527. Coler, 39. Coligni, Francis de, 249 n. Coligni, Gaspard de, admiral of France, 249 7j; besieges Caen, 167; murdered in the massacre of St Bartholomew's, 434, 462 n. Coligni, Odet de, archbishop of Toulouse, poisoned at Canterbury, 357 n. Collin, 39. Collobium, what, 219 m. Cologne, 462. Commission for visiting churches, 34, 60. Common Prayer-book established by act of parliament, 108 ; Bucer's opinion re- specting it, 307 11 ; puritan exceptions against, 420. Compagni, Bartholomew, factor to Edward VL, 55. Compater, 192 h. Compton, queen Elizabeth's visit to, 412 «. Concord, form of, 180 7t. Concord of Wittemberg, 182 «. Conde', prince of, 155 n ; queen Elizabeth made a contract with him, 155 n. Conders, Frederic, 410. Confederate Scots lords, 292 ??, 309 n ; standard of, 296. Confession of Augsburgh, 20 n, 21 n ; con- futation of, 182 m. Confession of Helvetia, 243 n, 206 ; eulo- gised by Bossuet, 243 n. Confirmation, Gualter's remarks on, 448. Congregation of Christ, in Scotland, 74. Constance, bishop of, 445. Constantinople, council of, 30 n. Cooch, Robert, notice of, 437 « ; letter of, 437. Cook, sir Antony, 6, 17, 68, 77 « ; letters of, 1, 18. Cook, Mildred, 77 «• Cope, sir Walter, 548 n. Copenhagen, 441. Copes, retained in churches, 98. Cordell, sir William, one of queen Mary's privy council, 5 ii. Corinth, 541. Cornelius, 88. CorniciuSj James, 37. 562 INDEX. Cornwallis, sir Thomas, one of queen Mary's privy council, 5 ii. Corranus, Antony, notice of, 471 «, 472 n ; letter of, 471- Corrichie, battle of, 172 w. Cosyn, Edward, condemned for treason, 172 n. Council of Frankfort, 214 h; in TruUo, 276 n. Court of Faculties, 239, 278. Cousins, John, minister of the French church in London, 313. Coventry, Lever preaches at, 110; martyrs at, 110m; queen of Scots removed to, 331 w, 354 II. Coverdale, Miles, bishop of Exeter, letter of, 228. Cox, Richard, concerned in the disputation at Westminster, 21 n ; designed for the bishoprick of Norwich, 33 ; bishop of Ely, 55 ; objects to the crucifix in the queen's chapel, 81 h; one of the com- pilers of the Liturgy, 387 « ; required to surrender some property belonging to his see, 497 «; letters of, 30, 81, 88, 147, 318, 334, 350, 387, 391, 403, 416, 419, 420, 452, 472, 474, 481, 486, 487, 496, 524. Crail, plague at, 555. Cranmer, archbishop, 18. Cranmer, (probably Thomas, son of the archbishop) 18. Crawford, earl of, arms in defence of the queen of Scots, 317 «• Crete, 461. Crito, an assumed name of the earl of Arran, 70 «. Croft, sir James, one of the royal visitors for the north, 97 n. Cross, form of, described, 93 ; sign of, used in the primitive church, 277 ; in baptism, 277, 281. Crowley, Robert, notice of, 279 «. Croy, Charles Philip de, 512 «. Croydon, visit of queen Elizabeth to, 429 «. Crucifix, retained in the queen's chapel, 79, 81 ; removed, 161 ; retained in the churches of Genuany, 96 n ; controversy respecting it, 80, 88, 98. Crypto-Calvinists, 486 n. Curio, Coelius Secundus, 31 n. Cyprian, 219, 236. Cyprus, invaded by the Turks, 344 n. D. Dalgleesh, 295 ?2. Dalkeith, 293 n. Dalmatic, the, a kind of dress, description of, 219 n. Dantzic, persecution of protestants at, 541. Darcy, lord, expedition of into Ireland, 431 «. Damley, Henry Stewart, lord, 125 m ; mar- ries the queen of Scots, 201 n ; attends mass, 209 ; murder of, 287, 292. Day, George, bishop of Chichester, com- mitted to the Fleet, 301 w. Day, John, printer, account of, 352 n ; letter of, 352. Day, William, provost of Eton, 485 n ; bishop of Winchester, ib. Decretal epistles, 207- Defholdius, 186. Demetrias, 541. Denmark, Frederic II., king of, 185 n. Denmark, war with Sweden, 185, 209. Derby, Henry Stanley, earl of, one of queen Elizabeth's privy council, 5 ?j ; commissioner for the north, 97 «. Desmond, earl of, raises a rebellion in Ire- land, 532 «. Deux Fonts, 179. Devenish, John, a martyr for religion, 302 ». Deventer, 185; besieged by duke Casimir, 520. Devereux, Lady Penelope, 518 «. Dieppe, 164 «, 249, 548. Digby, Simon, executed at York, 338 n, Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Ascham's opi- nion concerning, 138. Disputation at Westminster, account of, 25»(. Donatists, 390. Douglas, George, aids the queen of Scots in her escape from Lochleven, 314 n. Douglas, lady Margaret, 125h, 201 n. Downe, Anipney, 549 n. Drury, sir William, takes the castle of Edinburgh, 431 //. Dudley, lord Robert, one of queen Eliza- INDEX. 563 beth's suitors, 42 n ; master of the horse, 184. Duisburg, 89. Dumbarton, castle of, taken by the regent Lennox, 383. Dunkirk, 185. Dunstable, queen Elizabeth visits, 412 n. Durham, rebellion in, 329 n, 355 n. Dutch church in London, dissensions in, 313, 323 ; letter of, 542. Dutch church in Norwich, dissensions in, 362. E. Easter, controversy respecting the time of, 368 «, 438. Eaton, or Heton, Thomas, 3. Ecebolus, 244 n. Eckius, John, writes against the Confession of Augsburgh, 182 n. Edinburgh, seized by the adherents of the queen of Scots, 384 ; castle of, taken, 431 M, 433 «, 435 ; plague at, 555. Edward VI., 9 ; first book of, 275 n, 387 « ; second book of, ih. Eglinton, earl of, 317 "• Egmont, count, put to death by the duke of Alva, 316 ; notice of, 316 «. Egyptian priests, white vestments worn by, 307. Eliperius, 101. Elizabeth, princess, daughter of James I., 549 w. Elizabeth, queen, accession of, 4 ; reply to queen Mary's messengers, ih. ; privy council of, 5 n ; retains the mass in her private chapel, 29 ; thinks of recalling Peter Martyr, 31, 68, 98 ; and of join- ing the league at Smalcald, 31 ; procla- mations by, 20, 57, 467 n ; alienation of church-lands by, 84 n ; suitors of, 34, 42, 62, 113 m; declines being called the head of the church, 38 ; reforms the currency, 116;;, 127, 134; public acts of, 133 ; personal character of, 134, &c. ; declines sending representatives to Trent, 125 ; meditates an interview with the queen of Scots, 155 m; determines to assist the prince of Conde, 155 « ; ill of the small pox, 167 ; proposed mar- riage with Charles of Austria, 292 ; her death attempted by the papists, 359 ; progresses of, 56 r/, 130 », 412 ??, 480 n; letters of, 322, 480, 536, 538, 540, 543. Elizabeth of Saxony, marriage of, 322 n. Ely house, Holbom, 402, 497 n. Embden, 105 ; a mart for English mer- chants, 196 n. England, church of, alleged blemishes therein, 417 ; as described by Beza, 246 ; by Perceval Wiburn, 269 ; and Withers, 279. Englefield, sir Francis, one of queen IMary's privy council, 5 n. Epiphanius, 236; reproved by Chryso- stom, 459. Eppentianus, 549. Erasmus, bishop of Strasburgh, 165 n. Erdfurt, conference at, 245. Eric XIV., king of Sweden, 42 «, 185 n. Eric, son of Eric, duke of Hanover, 185 n. Erlach, Benedict, 554. Erlach, Wolfgang, 554. Erne, 554. Errol, earl of, 317 «• Erskine, John, earl of Mar, 553 n. Escot, Christopher, commissioner for a royal visitation in the north, 97 n. Essex, Robert Devereux, earl of, beheaded, 553 n. Essex, Walter Devereux, earl of, com- mands an expedition into Ireland, 431 n ; death and character of, 525 n. Esthonia, cession of, to Sweden, 185 n. Eusebius, quoted, 236, 276 n. Eustathius, 217, 235 n. Evers, Thomas, lord, in the commission for a royal visitation in the north, 97 « ; marches against the rebels, 329 n. Evodius, 444 n. Exorcisms, form of, in the first book of Edward VI., 275 n. Faber, Basil, 143 h. Faber, John, writes against the Confession of Augsburgh, 182 «. Fabricius, John Henry, son of the stand- ardbcarer of Zurich, 118, 129, 188. Faculties, Court of, 239, 278 ; offensive to the puritans, 281. 36—2 564 INDEX. Fagius, exhumation of, 114 7^ Falconer, 88 ; death of, 102. Farewell Cape, 512 ?;. Feckenham, John, abbot of Westminster, one of the disputants there, 22 7i ; speech of, in the house of lords, 30 ; sent to the Tower, WSn. Felton, Dunstan, 345. Felton, John, fixes the pope's bull against queen Elizabeth on the bishop of Lon- don's palace-gates, 335 ri ; canonized, 3C0 n. Ferdinand, emperor of Germany, son of, a suitor of queen Elizabeth, 1 62. Feria, duke of, ambassador from Spain, On, 22. Feroe isles, 512. Field, John, one of the compilers of the Admonition to Parliament, 421 «. Finland, John, duke of, G2 «, 113?(. See Sweden, prince of. Fittich, Vespasian, 37. Fitzalan, earl of Arundel, one of Eliza- beth's privy council, 5 n. Fitzgerald, Edward, sent to arrest the duke of Norfolk, 320 n. Flacius lUyricus, 143 n. Flanders, disorders in, 195; inundations there, 343. Fleming, lord, 315 ?;. Flinzbach, Cuman, 179 n. Flushing, troops sent there, 410; priva- teers of, 411. Folkherzheimer, Herman, 149 m; visits bishop Jewel, 150; translates Arrian's Periplus, 169; letters of, 149, 168, 184. Fornication, punishment of, in Scotland, 312. Forsteck, a village in Switzerland, 422 n. Fortescue, Antony, condemned for treason, 172 «. Foxe, Hugh, a martyr for religion, 301 n. Foxe, John, employed in collecting the history of the martyrs, 35, 128 ; attend- ed the duke of Norfolk at his execution, 397 M ; letter of, to the duke of Norfolk, 320 n ; letters of, 35, 45, 47, 56. France, peace concluded with, 177 n, 195 «, 409 ; affairs of, 357 ; war declared against, 177»; treaty of with Switzer- land, 199. France, king of, styles himself king of Scotland, 55; relinquishes the title, 112. Francis II., of France, 112 h, 164 «. Francis, Antony, 319. Frankfort, council of, 214. Frederic II., king of Denmark, 185 n. Frederic III., elector Palatine, favours Calvinism, 298 «, 502 n. Freming, a friend of sir Philip Sidney, 514. Frensham, Henry, 47, 49. Friesland, 512 n. Frisius, 186. Frobisher, sir Martin, notice of his voy- ages, 512 m, 513 n. Frobisher's straits, 513 n. Froschover, Christopher, a printer at Zu- rich, who entertained some of the English exiles, 23 n. Fulthorp, J., executed for treason, 338 n. Funckius, 186. Funeral sermons, Gualter's remarks re- specting, 448. G. Gabriel, the, one of sir Jlartin Frobisher's ships, 513 n. Gallasius, Nicolas, notice of, 106 » ; letter of, 106. Gangra, council of, 217, 219 w, 235. Gardiner, bishop, expelled Reniger from Oxford, 528 n. Gargrave, sir Thomas, one of the royal visitors for the north, 97 ", 332 n. Gates, sir Henry, one of the royal visitors for the north, 97 n. Geneva, besieged by the duke of Savoy, 536 n ; treaty of with Zurich and Berne, 540 n. Genevese, collection ordered in behalf of, 536 n. Gentile, Dr Alberic, 551 n. Gerard, 89. Germany, levy of troops in, 462. Gesner, Conrad, 40 n ; sends to England for MSS. of ancient ecclesiastical authors, 190»«; notice of his Bibliotheca, 470 w. Gheast, Edmund, (afterwards bishop of Rochester and .Salisbury) one of the dis- putants at Westminster, 23 w. Ghent, 185. INDEX. 565 Gilbye, a supposed author of the Admo- nition to Parliament, 421 «. Glasgow, plague at, 555. Glauberg, 510. Glencairn, earl of, 292 n. Glover, Robert, martyr, llOn. Gold, supposed discovery of, 512 «, 518. Goodman, Christopher, notice of a tract by, 32 71, 7C It ; preaches in the Scots camp, 74. Goodman, Gabriel, dean of Westminster, signs a warrant for the apprehension of Cartwright, 470 «. Gordon, John and Adam, sons of lord Huntley, made prisoners at Corrichie, 172 n. Gorhambury, visit of queen Elizabeth to, 412 H. Gossip, meaning of the word, 184. Gough, 280. Grange, lord. See Kirkaldy. Gran velle, cardinal, 195 7i. Gravelines, 185. Gregory Nazianzene, 174, 301. Gregory of Tours, 93. Greenland, 512 «. Greenwich, visit of queen Elizabeth to, 429 11. Gresham, sir Thomas, 196 «. Gressop, notice of, 279 n. Greville, Fulk, lord Brook, 515. Grey of WUton, lord, 109 n. Grey, lady Catharine, 120 n. Giindal, Edmund, 21 n ; one of the dispu- tants at Westminster, 23 ; made bishop of London, 33 ; translated to York, 343, 380 ; illness of, ih. ; made arch- bishop of Canterbury, 498 n ; confined to his house, 532 ; see sequestered by queen Elizabeth, 515 ?j; letters of, 43, 49, 114, 141, 173, 180, 242, 273, 283, 291, 308, 313 his, 323, 331, 337, 381, 434, 43G. Grisons, disturbances in the, 410, 432. Groningen, 185. Gropper, John, author of the yVntididagma, 44 H. Gryna;us, 47, 57- Gualter, Rodolph, 10 n ; publishes com- mentaries on St John's gospel, 197 ; on the prophets, 280 n ; on the Corinthians, 40G n, 41C n ; and Galatians, 503, 516 ; succeeds Bullinger as chief pastor of Zurich, 49G; letters of, 7, H, 13, 117, 2C0, 202, 404, 422, 440, 450, 480, 502, 516, 533. Gualter, Rodolph, son of the preceding, 391 n, 393 n ; maintained at Cambridge by bishop Parkhurst, 428 ; goes to Ox- ford, 432 ; testimonial of, 428 ; death of, 520, 523 ; letters of, 399, 426. Guelderland, 411, 520. Guernsey, sir Thomas Leighton, governor of, 493 11. GuildhaU, 411. Guise, Francis de Lorraine, duke of, 197 ; assassinated, 199 k. Guise, Henry de Lorraine, duke of, 197. Guldebeckius, 186. Guletta, 522 n. Gusman, don Diego, ambassador from Spain, 196 ». Guttenberg, silver mines of, 514. Gymnicus, 89. H. Habits, controversy respecting, 212, 215, 225 ; judgment of Bullinger respecting them, 215, &c. ; and Peter Martyr, ih. Haddon, Walter, 141 ; commissioner at Bruges, 198 n ; death of, 345 ; saying of queen Elizabeth respecting him, 345 n. Haerlem, blockade of, 431 n. Hales, John, 65. Hall, an island so called, 513 n. Haller, John, 6 ; letter of, ih. Hamburgh, commerce of the English with, 196 «, 324. Hamilton, James, of Bothwellhaugh, as- sassin of the regent Murray, 333 «. Hamilton, James, archbishop of St An- drew's, murdered at Dumbarton, 363 n. Hamilton, duke of, leader of the popish party in Scotland, 341. Hanau, count of, 519. Hardenberg, Albert, 1 42 n. Harding, Thomas, 01 ; Jewel's controversy with, 195 «, 207. Harpsfield, John, one of the popish dis- putants at Westminster, 23 n. Hart, sir Perceval, entertained queen Eli- zabeth, 429 11. 566 INDEX. Harvey, Henry, one of the royal visitors to the north, 97 n. Harwich, 512 n. Hastings, Edward, lord, one of queen Mary's privy council, 5 n. Hatton, sir Christopher, 479 » ; endeavours to obtain possession of Ely house, 497 m. Havering Bower visited by queen Eliza- beth, 412 «. Havre de Grace, 155 ?;; plague at, \1Qn. Havre, marquis d', 512 n. Heath, Nicholas, archbishop of i^ork, one of queen Mary's council, 5 n ; account of, 22 n, 347. Heidelberg, 322, 450 ; catechism of, 298«. Heldelin, James, 115. Helvetia, Confession of, 243 n. Henry, prince, son of James I., 552 n. Henry II., of France, killed at a tourna- ment, 51 n. Henry III., of France, 462 n, 465 «. See Arijou, duke of. Hepburn of Bantoun, 295 n. Herbert, Henry, lord, 126;;. Herbert, John, 193 7i. Heton, Thomas, 3. Herle, informed against Berners and Ma- ther, 397 "• Herman, archbishop of Cologne, 44 «. Hertford, Edward Seymour, earl of, com- mitted to the Tower, 126??. Heshusius, controversy of, with Zanchy, 192 H. Hesse, Philip, landgrave of, 20 w. Hexham, 329??, 355 «. Higham, sir Clement, one of queen Mary's council, 5 n. Hilles, Richard, a merchant, and con- tributor to the exiles in queen Mary's reign, 427 ; letters of, 19, 146, 266, 305, 327, 345, 348, 395, 407, 523. Hilles, Barnabas, 348, 407. Hilles, Gerson, 395, 408. Hippolytus, 207. Ilirter, 75. Holbom, St Andrew's church, Zuinglius buried in, 402. Holland, Garland, a bookseller at Oxford, 523. Holstein, Adolph, duke of, 42 n, 113k. Holyrood house, riot at, 127 n. Hoogstraat, 185. Hoper, Ann, wife of bishop, 47 «. Horace, quoted, 166. Horn, Robert, returns from exile, 23 ; dis- putes at Westminster, 23, 26, 37 ; bishop of Winchester, 117 ; his death, 532 « ; letters of, 188, 199, 353, 413, 492, 498. Horn, count of, executed at Brussels, 316; notice of, 316 «. Hosius, cardinal, some account of, 148 n. Howard of Effingham, Charles, lord, one of queen Elizabeth's privy council, 5 »?. Howard, Thomas. See Norfolk, duke of. Howe, 553. Hubner, Peter, notice of, 529 n. Huguenots, treaty with, 357 « ; seek refuge in London, 426, 434. Huldrich, John, 519 n, 521. Hume, lord, 292 n. Humphrey, Laurence, 273 ; exile at Zu- rich, 23 H ; refuses to join the separatists, 314, 435 ; president of Magdalene col- lege, Oxford, 528; writes the life of Jewel, 477 »; letters of, 48, 177, 210, 233, 432, 476, 519, 521. Hungerford, Antony, notice of, 549 n. Hunsdon, lord, 354 ?i ; letter of, to lord Burghley, quoted, 333 n. Huntley, earl of, 317 « ; his death, 172. Hyperius, 176. Images removed from churches, 300 n ; disputation respecting, 86 ; worship of condemned, 214 «. Immersion, trine, in baptism, 228. Innocent, 234. Interim, account of, 232 ??. Inundation in Norfolk and Suffolk, 343. Ireland, rebellion in, 532 71. IrenaBus, 94, 368. Isbrandus, Balkius, minister of the Dutch church in Norwich, 362 n. James VI. of Scotland, birth of, 227 n, 242 ; baptism of, 284 u ; crowned king of Scotland, 309 ; message of to Gualter, 530 ; sends ambassadors to queen Eliza- beth, 553 n. INDEX. 567 Jarnac, battle of, 465 n. Jemingham, sir Henry, one of queen Mary's privy council, 5«. Jerome, quoted, 306 n, 307 «, 349. Jewel, John, returns from exile, 21 ; one of the disputants at Westminster, 23 ; a royal visitor for Devonshire, 34, 54 ; bishop of Salisbury, 64 n ; domestic character described, 150, &c. ; pub- lishes his Apology, 124 n ; his sermon at Paul's cross, 207 « ; death of, 382, 391 ; disposal of his property, 484 ; letters of, 15, 21, 25, 28, 30, 33, 41, 54, 60, 63, 64,67, 69,73, 86, 89, 101, 104, 112, 115, 123, 127, 129, 154, 157, 159, 166, 170, 194, 206, 213, 285, 339, 343. John, Don, of Austria, 407 n. John Frederic, elector of Saxony, 20 n. John de villa Garsya, a Spanish monk, 42 H. Johnston, John, notice of, 551 ?« ; letters of, 551, 554. Jordan, 515. Judex, Matthew, 143 n. Julius Santerentianus, attendant on Peter Martyr, 18, 65, 287, 338. Julius, pope, saying of, 321. Junius, Francis, 386 m. Justinian, the emperor, 29. K. Keith, George, earl Marischal, 516. Keith, William, brother of the preceding, 516 «. KiUegrew, sir Henry, brother-in-law to lord Burghley, sent ambassador into Scotland, 322. Kinloss, abbot of, ambassador to England, 553 II. Kingsmill, Richard, one of the royal visit- ors for the north, 97 «• Kinsale, 555 n. Kirkaldy, sir William, of Grange, 292 «, 295 II ; governor of Edinburgh castle, 384 n ; deserted to the queen's party, 384 ; and executed, 435. Kitchen, Antony, bishop of lilandafF, 22 «. Knockfergus, 431 n. Knolles, sir Francis, one of queen Eliza- beth's privy councillors, 5 n. Knolles, Henry, queen Elizabeth's agent in Germany, 164. Knox, John, 242 ; banished from Edin- burgh, 34, 244 ; preaches in the Scots camp, 74 ; declaims against idolatry, 209; returns to Edinburgh, 310; notice of his book against the empire of women, 76 11. Lastus, Erasmus, a divine of Copenhagen, 441. Lakin, Thomas, an exile for religion, 45. Lamoral, count Egmont, 316 «. Langdale, Alban, archdeacon of Chiches- ter, one of the disputants at Westminster, 23 n. Langside, battle of, 315 m, 317 «• Languet, Hubert, account of, 511 n ; letter of, 529. Lanscade, Christopher, 451, 504. Laodicea, council of, 235. Latoun , laird of, 552 n, Lavater, Louis, 75; married BuUinger's daughter, 306 «. Ledington, lord, 315 «. Legate de Latere, 282. Leicester, earl of, 320 /?, 508. Leighton, sir Thomas, governor of Guern- sey, 493 11. Leipsic, university of, 441. Leith, taken by the English, 109 ; capitu- lation of, 105 «, 112; levelled to the ground, 113; again fortified by the king's party, 384. Lennox, Lodowick, duke of, 553 n. Lennox, Matthew Stewart, earl of, com- mitted to the Tower, 125 ; regent of Scotland, 339 ; murdered at Stirling, 383. Lennox, Margaret Douglas, countess, 125. Lepanto, battle of, 407 n. Lethington, lord Maitland of, 292 «. Lever, Thomas, master of St John's, Cam- bridge, 337 ; notice of, 279 «; minister at Coventry, 1 10 ; refuses to join the separatists, 314; preaches at the funeral of Dr Turner, 318; letters of, 57, 108. Lewin, William, 504 ; letters of, 504, 506. Jjcwis, count, brother of the prince of Orange, 317, 411,462. 568 INDEX. Lewis II., duke of Bavaria, 502 n. Lewis, elector palatine, favours Lutheran- ism, 298 n. Lewis XL, saying of, ICO. Liberian, 75. Licenses for preaching recalled, 303. Lichtenstein, Henry, baron of, 515. Limacius, Laurence, 192. Lindsay, lord, 292 «. Linlithgow, the regent Murray murdered at, 330 n, 333. Liturgy of Edw. VI., 387 ; Bucer's opinion of, 387 w ; Jlartyr's opinion, ih. London, plague at, 17G», 197. Lord's Supper, primitive mode of ad- ministering, 27c ?«. Lorraine, cardinal of, attacked in Paris, 197. Louvaine, 185. Lovelace, William, in a commission for a royal visitation, 54 n. Low Countries. See Flanders. Lubetius, 515. Lumey, William Vandermarke, lord of, 410. Luncher, 17G. Lunenberg, Ernest, duke of, 20 n. Luther, Martin, 20 m, 142. Lutherans, animosity of against the sacra- mentaries, 2(59. Lycosthenes, Conrad, abridged Gesner's Bibliotheca, 470 n. Lynn, I76. Lyons, plague in, 194. M. Maclaine, Peter, 4G. Macphelim, Brian, 431 «. Macquhirrie, Alexander, 552 n. Magdalene college, Oxford, 408 «, 427, 432. Magdeburgh, centuriators of, 143;;. Magdeburgh, duke of, 422. Magellan, 512. Maitland, lord of Lethington, 292 n. J\Ialta, 4G2. Man, John, warden of Merton, published the Common Places of IMusculus, in English, 280 n. Manichees, 228. Mar, carl of, 292 n \ chosen regent, 384;;. 3Iargaret, queen of Scotland, 201 n. Marlorat, Augustine, his comment upon St John, used in England, 280 «. Marnix, Philip de, 511 n. 3Iarpach, Dr, 51. Marpurg, conferences at, 141 n. Marriage of clergy authorised by act of parliament, 300. IMarriage, license for, at prohibited seasons, 281. Marshal, Richard, notice of, 24 n. 3Iartinengo, abbot of, the pope's nuncio, ]2r,n. Martinists, Lutherans so called, 268. Martyr, Peter, invited to return to Eng- land, 31 7i, CI, G8 ; sends a book to queen Elizabeth, 32 ; writes a commen- tary on Judges, 280 n ; his book on vows, 61; attends the conference at Poissy, 123m; writes on the ubiquita- rian controversy, 124k; death of, 189; medallion of, in silver, sent to Jewel, 1 90 ; his opinion respecting the habits,- 227 ; of the Common Prayer-book, 387 m, 388; wife of, C2w; letters of, 52, 05, 84, 95, 120, 161. Martyrs, number of, in Mary's reign, 4G4 «. Mary, queen, message of, to Elizabeth, 4 ; death of, 4. Mary, queen of Scots, 125m; retains the mass, ]5G, 196; seeks an interview with Elizabeth, 155 n ; sends her presents, 155 ; marries Lord Darnley, 201 ; mar- ries the earl of Bothwell, 292 ; suspected of the murder of her husband, 309 ; escapes to Dunbar, 293 n ; confined in Lochleven castle, 309 ; resigns the crown to her son, 309 v ; escapes from Loch- leven, 314m; flies to Castle Hamilton, 315; escapes to Carlisle, ih. ; confined in Bolton, Tutbury, and Sheffield castles, 325 M, 431 '; ; transferred to Coventry 331 11 ; regulations respecting her impri- sonment, 382 M ; proposed marriage with the duke of Norfolk, 320 ; sought in marriage by the brother of the king of France, 344 ; letter of, 315 m. I\Iascall, Robert, 395. Mason, sir John, a privy councillor, 5 n ; appointed to examine into a complaint against bishop Bonner, 16 n. INDEX. 569 Mass, abolition of, 38, 44 ; riots at Holy- rood house occasioned by, 127 «• Massacre of St Bartholomew's, 413 ?/. Masters, Richard, physician to queen Eli- zabeth, 17 w ; letters of, 119, 129, 197- Mather, execution of, 397 «• Matilda, wife of Lewis II. of Bavaria, 502 «. Matthew, archbishop, 485 n. Maurice, elector of Saxony, 232??. Maximilian, the emperor, endeavours to obtain the crown of Poland, 502 n. May, William, dean of St Paul's, death of, 117- Mayence, 462. Meadows, Dr James, notice of, 549 n. Blearing, Margaret, a martyr for religion, 301 «. Meath, bishop of, retires to the continent, 475 ». Mechlin, 185. Medina Celi, duke of, viceroy in Flanders, 411. Meghem, count, 310?;. Meier, AV^olfgang, notice of, 545 «. Melancthon, Philip, 232 ; concerned in the Confession of Augsburg, 20 n ; writes the apology for it, 182 7«; conduct of with respect to the Interim, 232 h; book of reformation by, 44 n ; death of, 137 «• Melvil, Andrew, 553 n. Melvil, sir James, 530 «. Mere, Poltrot de, assassinates the duke of Guise, 199 ii. Merell, 529. Merenda, Catharine, wife of Peter Martyr, 62 )i. Merick, Rowland, bishop of Bangor, 78 ii. Metherk, Adolph, 512 u. Metz, siege of, 524. IMichael, the, one of sir Martin Frobisher's ships so called, 513 «. Middleberg, invaded by the Walloons, 410. I\Iinisters, remarks on the election and equality of, 442, 447. Ministers, liondon, deprived, 280 n ; cited before the commissioners, 303. Monasteries, abolished in Scotland, 199. Money, Spanish, taken possession of by Elizabetli, 323 ,i, 347. Moniepennie, David, 553?*. IMonks, expulsion of, 300. Mons, 524. Mont, Christopher, queen Elizabeth's agent at Strasburgh, 164 «, 268 w, 322;?, 328, 365 ; death of, 412 ; letter of, 319. IMontague, viscount, one of queen Mary's privy council, 5«; commissioner at Bruges, 198 it. Montauban, 432 n. Montcontour, battle of, 465 n. Montmorenei, Ann, duke of, 198. IMontmorenei Francis, duke of, ambassador to England, 42, 410 n. IMontmorenei, marshal, governor of Paris, 197 "■ Montmorenei, Philip, count Horn, 316. Montpelier, 546. Montrose, earl of, 317 m. Moors, victory of, in Spain, 334. Mordaunt, sir John, one of queen Mary's privy council, 5 n. Morison, sir Richard, 136. 3Iorley, Henry Parker, lord, 475 n. Morton, earl of, delivers the earl of North- umberland to the English, 332 n. Mountjoy, lord, defeats the Spaniards in Ireland, 555. IMuhlhausen, 193. Mullins, John, dean of Bocking, notice of, 528 n. Muralt, 18. Murray, earl of, 176 k, 209 «, 242, 244 ; regent in Scotland, 309, 324 ; assassina- tion of, 330, 333 «, 358. IMurray, lord, of TuUibardin, 292 n. Musculus, ^Wolfgang, 7 « ; Common Places of, translated by J. IMan, 280 n. Mydelmore, 316 n. N. Naper, Andrew, 552. Navarre, Antony de Bourbon, king of, 1 18. Navarre, queen of, 357 n. Naworth, 329 «. Na/.ianzene, Gregory, 174, 501. Negelin, 7- Netherlands, commerce with, interrupted, 323. Ncuberg, conference at, 327. NeviU, Dr, 545. 570 INDEX. Newhaven, plague at, 188. Nice, councils of, referred to, 214, 443 «. Niger, Bernard, one of the Magdeburg cen- turiators, 143 n, 145. Nimeguen, 185. Nismes, 432 n. Nominalists, (!8. Norfolk, Thomas Howard, duke of, 120?«; suitor of the queen of Scots, 320 ; con- spiracy of, 331; trial of, 383 «, 398; peers present, 399 » ; condemnation of, 392 ; executed, 397 ", 404, 409h.. Norfolk, Mary Fitz-Alan, duchess of, her funeral, 190. Norfolk, rebellion in, 342 n ; late harvest and scarcity in, 455. Norris, John, gallantry of, in Flanders, 521 n. North, Roger, lord, obtains the manor of Somersham, 497 »• Northampton, William Par, marquis of, one of queen Elizabeth's privy council, 5 n ; his death, 3G3. Northeim, 480. Northumberland, Thomas Percy, earl of, one of the royal visitors for the north, 97 n ; heads the rebellion there, 329, 331, 340, 354 ; flight, and confinement in Lochleven, 329 ii ; execution of, 332 n. Northumberland, Anne Somerset, countess of, 397 "• Norton, Christopher and Thomas, executed at York, 338 n. Norton, Richard, a leader of the rebels in the north, 330 ii. Norwich, bishoprick of, offered to Sampson, 99 «. Norwich, cathedral of, injured by lightning, 17fJ; Dutch church at, disturbances therein, 3G2 n. No well, Dr Alexander, dean of St Paul's, 397 n ; signs a warrant for the appre- hension of Cartwright, 479 n. Nuremberg, 20 n. O. Occamists, G8. Ochinus, Bernardine, a learned Italian, in- vited into England by archbishop Cran- mer, 72 n. (Ecolampadius, John, 467- Oglethorpe, Owen,bishop of Carlisle, 22 n, 87. Oil, use of, abolished in the church of England, 275. Olevianus, Caspar, minister at Heidelberg, 450 n. O'Neale, John, rebels against queen Eliza- beth, 287 w, 295 w; killed in an affray, 295. Oporinus, John, a printer at Basle, 193 n. Orange, William of Nassau, prince of, 321, 410 ft., 435. Orenberg, count Von, killed at Groningen, 317. Organs, the use of, objected to, 282. Orleans, siege of, 199 h. Orpington, 429 n. Osiander, 171 n. Ostend, blockade of, 555. Otho, constitutions of, 234. Overton, bishop, 485 oi. Oxford, earl of, 508. Oxford, state of religion in, 42, 101 ; Gualter's commendation of, 501. P. Paget, sir William, 300 «. Paget, AVilliam, lord, one of queen Mary's privy council, 5h. Pallium, description of the, 236. Pamphilus, an assumed name of Thomas Randolph, 70 /'. Pappus, an opponent of Sturmius, 535 «. Paris, protestant service forbidden at, 357 «. Parker, Matthew, archbishop of Canter- bury, death and character of, 488 n; letter of, 143. Parker, son of the archbishop, 485 w. Parker, 360. Parkhurst, John, exile at Zurich, 10, 13, 15, 23 h; rector of Cleeve, 6.3, lb; re- fuses a bishoprick, 75 ; made bishop of Norwich, 7'^ «, 100; interposes in the dissensions there, 362 ; embarrassed by the misconduct of his agent, 394 h; death of, 488 n ; letters of, 38, 40, 74, 138, 140, 160, 172, 175, 190, 201, 240, 294, 317, 342, 361, 398, 415, 455, 456, 468, 470. INDEX. 571 Parliament, proceedings of mentioned, 21 « ; prorogued, 197 «; meeting of, 249 h. Parma, duke of, governor of the Nether- lands, 528 «. Parma, duchess of, 195?j; regent of the Netherlands, 195 n. Parry, Henry, in a commission for religion, 54 n. Parry, sir Thomas, one of queen Eliza- beth's privy council, 5n. Parry s, Thomas, 302??. Partridge, Nicolas, 10 n. Pate, Richard, bishop of Worcester, 22 n ; confined in the Tower, 103 ?i. Patriarch, title of, when given to bishops, 443 m. Paul IV., pope, 146«. Paul's Cross, 5. Paulet, sir Amias, ambassador to France, 507. Paulus, Andreas, 515. Peckham, sir Edmund, one of queen Mary's privy council, 5 «. Peckham, sir Robert, one of queen Mary's privy council, 5«. Pellican, Conrad, 192 ». Pembroke, AVilliam Herbert, earl of, one of queen Elizabeth's privy council, 5« ; in a commission for religion, 54 h ; con- fined to his own house, 321 n. Pembroke college, Oxford, 522 ». Peneman, Robert, executed for treason, 338 «. Penny, Dr, notice of, 2/9 ??, 401 n. Percy, sir Henry, one of the royal visitors for the north, 97 n. Pern, Dr Andrew, master of Peterhouse, 114'?. Petalum, description of the, 219 «. Petre, sir William, 91, 103 ; one of queen Elizabeth's privy council, 5». Peucer, Caspar, head of the university of Wittemberg, 456 »?. Pflug, Julius, bishop of Naumberg, 232 w. Philip II. suitor of queen Elizabeth, 1, Gn; makes peace with France, 44. Philpot, John, 280 «i examined by Dr Story, 359 «. Pickering, sir William, one of queen Eliza- beth's suitors, 34, 42 ii. Pilgrimages forbidden, 300. Pilkington, James, master of St John's college, Cambridge, bishop of Durham, 187; his property destroyed in the re- bellion, 332 ; letter to Cecil quoted, 332 n ; illness of, 382 ; death of, 495 ; letters of, 336, 424. Pistorius, 44. Pius IV. pope, 22??, 14G;?, 148. Pius V. pope, bull of, against queen Eliza- beth, 339 «, 344; answered by BuUinger, 351 ; subsidized the duke of Savoy, 319 «. Plague, the, breaks out at Chiavenna, 92 ; in London and Newhaven, 176 ; at Basle and Lyons, 194; at Zurich, 199; at Edinburgh, Glasgow, and Crail, 555. Plessis du, 221 ii. Pliny, quoted, 169??. Plumtree, a priest, executed for treason, 338??. Poictiers, 149. Poissy, conference at, 1 23 n. Pole, Arthur and Edmund, condemned for treason, 126 ??. Pole, Reginald, cardinal, death of, 4 ??. Polydore Virgil, 145 «. Pontius, the deacon, 236. Popery abolished in England, 59, 300??. Possession, alleged demoniacal, at Norwich, 469. Poynings, sir Adrian, marshal of New- haven, 165 ??. Prayer, forms of, Gualter's opinion respect- ing, 446. Prayers in a foreign tongue, disallowed in the church of England, 275. Preachers, five deprived, 226. Preaching prohibited by queen Elizabeth, 16;?. Presbytery, Gualter's opinion of, 450, 465 ; BuUinger's opinion of, 457. Presence, real, article of Edward VJ. re- specting, 240 ??. Prcstall, John, condemned for treason, 172??. Privy council, names of queen Elizabeth's first, 5 It. Puteo, James, cardinal, 24 ii. R. Rainolds, John, president of Corpus Christi college, Oxford, 500 ??;550; letter of, 500. 572 INDEX. Randau, count, plenipotentiary fromFrancis II., 112;?. Randolph, Thomas, queen Elizabeth's a- gent in Scotland, employed to convey the earl of Arran into Scotland, 70 n ; designated by the name of Pamphilus, ib. Ratisbon, conference at, 502. Raymond, 291. Rebellion in the north, notice of, 329, 331, 33«. Reformation, book of, 44 n. Reformation, how tolerated in France, 357. Reister, meaning of the word, 515 n. Religion, commission for the establishment of, 34. Religion, state of, in England, 90. Reniger, Michael, expelled from INIagdalene college, by bishop Gardiner, 528 ?«. Renner, 75. Reutlingen, 20 n. Reyna de, Cassiodorus, notice of, 325 ??. Rich, lord, expedition of, into Ireland, 431 n. Ridley, bishop, executors of, complain against bishop Bonner, 1G«. Ripon, rebels at, 354 n. Rizzio, David, murder of, 240 n, 244. Rochelle, 149 ; siege of, 432 n ; synod at, 357 «. Rodolph I., 502 n. Rogers, Daniel, notice of, 517 w. Rogers, sir Edward, an exile for religion, privy councillor to queen Elizabeth, 5 ii. Rohan, M. de, queen Elizabeth's contract with, 155?;. Rostock, 441. Rotaker, Christopher, 75. Rothes, Andrew Leslie, joined the asso- ciation on behalf of the queen of Scots, 317«. Rouen, siege of, 14C«. Rough, John, a martyr for religion, 30ln. Rullus,457«. Russel,_lord Francis, 300 « ; letters of, 82, 526. Rutland, Roger, fifth earl of, 329 «, 548 7i. Ruthven, Patrick, baron, took part in the murder of Rizzio, 240 «. Ryche, lord, one of queen Mary's privy coCmcil, 5«. S. Sackvil, sir Richard, one of queen Eliza- beth's privy council, 5 n. Sadler, sir Ralph, 354 n. Salisbury, cathedral of, injured by light- ning, 102 ; bishop's palace described, 150. Salisbury, John of, 214 «. Salkyns, William, 43, 142. Salvart, 519. Sampson, Thomas, dean of Christchurch, bishoprick of Norwich offered to, 99 n ; preached at the funeral of the duchess of Norfolk, 190 n ; Grindal's testimony to, 273 ; deprived, 22C 7i ; refuses to join the separatists, 314, 435; letters of, 2, 78, 99, 174,211. Sandwich, dissensions among the Dutch there, 362. Sandys, Edwin, returns from exile, 21 « ; made bishop of ^Vorcester, 97 ; one of the royal visitors for the north, 97 « ; his second marriage, 99 ; translated to Lon- don, 342, 343; signs a warrant for the apprehension of Cartwright, 479 ?« ; arch- bishop of York, 531 ; letters of, 3, 97, 205, 393, 438, 478 &M, 531. Santrinus, 508. Sarum, Old, 152. Saunders, Nicholas, his book de Visibill Monarchia, 418, 449. Savoy, duke of, endeavours to obtain pos- session of Geneva, 540 «; subsidized by Pius v., 319 «. Saxony, elector of, 20 « ; prince of, a suitor to queen Elizabeth, 34. Scambler, Edward, a preacher in queen Mary's time, 17«; bishop of Lichfield and Coventry, 301 n. Schneider, John, 128. Schweitzer, Christophel, 550. Scipio, a friend of bishop Jewel, 125 n. Scory, John, one of the disputants at Westminster, 23 n ; bishop of Hereford, 33. Scot, Cuthbert, bishop of Chester, opposes the reformation, 22 u. Scots, queen of. See Mary. Scotland, religious disturbances in, 33 ; monasteries destroyed, 55 ; affairs of, 73, INDEX. 573 82, 109, 112, 208, 284, 30!), 311, 339, 358, 383. Scriptures, reading of, commanded, 449. Scroop, Henry, lord, invades Scotland, 338 n. Scultetus, Abraham, 549 ?i. Ssbald, 142. Selim II., sultan of Turkey, 461 h. Sempach, battle of, 486 ?«. Sempil, Helen, 552 n. Sempil, lord, 292 7i. Service-book, 21 w, 38. Servitutes liiminnm, 168 jj. Seymour, lord E., 475 n. Seymour, sir F., 300 n. Sheffield castle, 431 «. Shepherd, Nicholas, master of St John's college, Cambridge, 385 n. Shrewsbury, Francis Talbot, earl of, 5 n ; notice of, 26 n ; president of the council in the north, 97 n. Shrewsbury, George Talbot, earl of, high steward at the duke of Norfolk's trial, 383 H. Sicilian vespers, 434 n. Sicily, warlike preparations in, 462. Sidall, Henry, account of, 29 n, 104. Sidney, sir Henry, 155 ?7. Sidney, sir Philip, letters of, 511, 517. Sidney, Robert, 529. Sidonius, Michael, 232 n. Sigismund III., king of Poland, 543. Simler, Josiah, married Bullinger's daugh- ter, 306 n ; prepares an edition of P. Martyr's works, 190 ; writes a- gainst Stancarus, 107; and Brentius, 476; iUness of, 159. Simpson, Cuthbert, a martyr for religion, 301 n. Sisinnius, 219 «, 236. Slays, sea-fight near, 411. Smalcald, league of, 31. Smith, John Henry. See Fahricius. Smith, Richard, account of, 24 », 61. Smith, sir Thomas, secretary of state to queen Elizabeth, 433 n. Somersham, manor of, 497 «• Soto, Peter, a Spanish friar, 42. Southwell, sir Richard, one of queen Mary's privy council, 5 n. Southampton, 150. Spain, king of, message of, to queen Eliza- beth, 321. Spanish ships taken by the Dutch, 411. Spencer, Thomas, archdeacon of Chichester death of, 362. Sponsors, Gualter's opinion respecting, 447. Springham, Richard, 18; notice of, 148 h. Stafford, sir Edward, 532 n. Stafford, lord, letter of, 545. Stancarus, notice of, 170 n. Staphylus, notice of, 136;«. St Andrew's, Holborn, R. Zuinglius buried at, 402. St Andrew's, archbishop of, 74, 176; exe- cution of, 363 «. St Antholin's, morning service at, 41 n. St Bartholomew's, massacre of, 434 «, 462 n. St Denys, college of, at Heidelberg, 450. Stolberg, count, ambassador from the em- peror, 292. Stonehenge, 152. Story, John, sent to prison, 103 « ; arrested, 140; escapes to Flanders, 359; re-ap- prehended and executed, 140 h, 360 n ; canonized at Rome, ib. Strasburg, the Confession of Augsburg en- forced at, 192. Stuart, James. See Murray. Stuart, Lewis, duke of Lennox, 553 n. Stuckius, John William, notice of, 554 n. Stumphius, Tb. Sturmius, John, notice of, 507 «, 535 ?»; comments on Aristotle, 135 r? ; appointed agent to queen Elizabeth, 413 ; letters of, 325, 326, 451. Sturmius, Peter, 179. Style, new, 211. Succession to the crown debated in parlia- ment, 286 n. Suffolk, Catharine Willoughby, duchess of, exile for religion, 451 n. Sultzer, Simon, 179», 180h. Superstition, popish^ instances of, in York- shire, 381 11. Supper, the Lord's, should be preceded by a sermon, 447. Supremacy, the, transferred from the pope to Henry VIII., 282. Sussex, Thomas Ratcliffe, carl of, sent 574 INDEX. against the rebels in the north, 32'J)i; invades Scotland, 339. Sutherland, earl of, one of the association in defence of the queen of Scots, 317 «• Sweden, king of, a suitor to queen Eliza- beth, 62; expected in England, 113h. Sweden, prince of, arrived in England, 62?/. Sweden, war with Denmark, 185, 209. Sylverius, patriarch of Rome, 29 n. Tables, substituted for altars, 301 ii. Tadcaster, rebels at, 354 n. Talbot, earl of, presided at the trial of the duke of Norfolk, 383 it. Tallow, laird of, 295 n. Tamars, de, 511. Tapers, use of, abolished in the church of England, 276. Taxis, John Baptista de, 514 n. Tertullian, 109 n, 234. Theobalds, visited by queen Elizabeth, 412 n. Theodora, empress, 30 n. Theophilus, minister of the Strangers' church at Norwich, 362 «, 398 «. Thirlby, Thomas, bishop of Ely, one of queen Blary's council, 5 n ; commissioner about the restoration of Calais, 17 ; death of, 347- Thoman, Caspar, notice of, 546 n ; letter of, 547. Thorgau, convocation of, 456 u, 486 «. Thornton, Thomas, notice of, 550 n. Throgmorton, sir Clement, 16 «. Throgmorton, sir Nicholas, ambassador in France, 177 «• Thuanus, 511 >i. Thymelthorp, George, his frauds on the bishop of Norwich, 394 ?;, 455 «. Torquatus, an Italian astrologer, 62 w. Toxites, Michael, 131. Tradition, alleged necessity of, 393. Tremellius, John Immanuel, Hebrew pro- fessor at Cambridge, 386 n. Trent, council of, resumed, 146 n. Tullibardin, lord JMurray, of, 292 h. Tunica, what, 219 n. Tunstal, Cuthbert, bishop of Durham, 87. Turbervile, James, bishop of Exeter, 22 it. Turks, defeat of, at Lepanto. 407 «• Turner, Dr William, dean of Wells, notice of, 230 ;/. Turner, Dr, a physician, 401 n; letter of, 230. Tutbury, queen of Scots confined at, 325 11. Tyrone, earl of, defeated in Ireland, 655. U. Ubiquitarians, 116 n, 189, 195,468; at- tacked by Sturmius, 535. Ulmer, John Rodolph, 519 «, 521. LHrnis, John ab, 526 n. Ulstat, Daniel, contracts for reforming the debased currency, 116?2. Ulster, rebellion in, 431 n. Uniformity, act of, 21 n. Ursinus, Zachary, catechism of, 298 n. Vahan, 136 «. Valence, bishop of, plenipotentiary from Francis II., 112 n. Valenciennes, revolts from the duke of Alva, 411. Vandermarke, William, lord of Lumey, takes the Brill, 410 «. Venetians, war of, with the Turks, 344 n. Venice, 344, 407 «, 441. Venlo, revolts from the duke of Alva, 411. Vere, sir Francis, governor of Ostend, 555. Vergerius, 31 «. Vespers, Sicilian, 434 n. Vestiarian controversy, 201, 202, 208, 273 w, 359. Vestments, P. Martyr's opinion respecting the, 84. Victor, bishop of Rome, 207 ; rebuked by Irenasus, 368. Vigilius, 29 ; of Thapsus, 145 n. V^illa Garsya, John de, 42 w. Villars, preacher of the French church in London, 483 >i. Virgilius, Polydore, 145 «. INDEX. 575 w. Wacker, 515. Wafer-bread, used in the administration of the Lord's Supper, 302. Wagner, Mark, 143 «. Waldegrave, sir Edward, one of queen Mary's privy council, 5 n. Walloons, 410. Walsingham, sir Francis, letter of, 510. Warwick, earl of, 512 h ; sent against the rebels in the north, 355 n. Warwick, visit of queen Elizabeth to, 412;/. Waser, Caspar, notice of, 547 n. Wasselheim, 115. Watson, Thomas, bishop of Lincoln, 16 >i ; committed to the Tower, 103 n. Weidner, Wolfgang, pastor at Worms, 30. Wentworth, Thomas, lord, one of queen Mary's privy council, 5 ii. Werdmuller, 549. Werter, Philip and Antony, 136. Westminster, disputation between protest- ants and papists at, 25. Westminster abbey, 410. Westmoreland, Charles, earl of, heads the rebellion in the north, 329, 331,354 ; his escape, 332 n. Weston, Hugh, notice of, 24 «. Westphaling, Herbert, canon of Christ- church, bishop of Hereford, 485 72, Wetherby, rebels at, 354 «. Wharton, sir Thomas, one of queen Mary's privy council, 5 n. White, John, bishop of Winchester, preaches at queen IMary's funeral, 16 ?« ; committed to the Tower, 103 n ; wrote against Peter Martyr, 90 ; death of, ib. Whitehead, David, notice of, 23 ii ; preaches before queen Elizabeth, 23 n ; death of, 349, 361. Whitgift, Dr John, rei^lies to Cartwright, 434, 441 ?t, 473«, 475; master of Trinity college, 436. Whittington college, 226 n. Wiburn, Perceval, notice of, 280 n, 288, 405 }i ; letters of, 269, 288. Wickham, bishop, 485 n. Wigand, John, 143 n. Wight, Isle of, 150. Wigston's hospital, 226 7t. ■ Wilcox, Thomas, one of the compilers of the Admonition to Parliament, 412 n. Wilford, sir Thomas, 99 n. Wilford, Cecilia, wife of bishop Sandys, 99 H. Willoughby d'Eresby, Catherine, baroness, an exile for religion, 451 k. Willoughby, Peregrine, lord, 549 n. Willoughby of Parham, William, lord, 329 It. Winchester, William Paulet, marquis of, lord treasurer, 16. Wingfield, sir Antony, 300 n. Witchcraft, an act against, 60 ii. Withers, George, 294 n, 405 n ; letters of, 279, 298. Wittemberg, concord of, 182 n ; university of, 441,483. Woburn, visit of queen Elizabeth to, 41272. WoUey, sir John, account of, 429 n ; letter of, 429. Wolsey, cardinal, arrested at Cawood, 381 n. Women, not allowed to baptize, 276. Wonlychius, 75. Woodhouselie, 33 7«. Woodstock, visit of queen Elizabeth to, 412/2. Worcester house, 302 «. Workington, the queen of Scots lands at, 315 72. Worms, congress at, 205. Wotton, Nicholas, one of queen Mary's councillors, 5ii ; commissioner in France, 17 72; and at Bruges, 198;?. Wroth, sir Thomas, 6, 68, 112 ii. Young, John, one of the disputants in Cambridge against Bucer, 43 ii. Young, Peter, preceptor of James VL, 530 72. Z. Zanchius, Hicrome, account of, 18, 178;?, 364 72; pastor at Chiavenna, 191, 194; letters of, 178, 191, 192, 497, 534. 576 INDEX. Zeni, Nicholas and Antony, 512 n. Zuinglius, Rodolph, notice of, 393 n ; ill- ness and death of, 400 ; letter of, 385. Zuinglius, Ulric, father of the preceding 57 ; married Bullinger's daughter, 306 «. letter from, to queen Zuinglius, 467. Zurich, council of, Elizabeth, 545. Zurich, tithes of, possessed by the bishop of Constance, 445 ; St Peter's church, ib. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY Los Angeles j This book is DUFoiI mMaSiHte stamped below. JP ^ 8 1959 4^ WIAR 3 1 196; ^i^ RETD BOOK BOX IIAY2 36/f Form L0-7»(-7,'56{C1107s4)444 uhe: ''^s-f ;, (iii'7';y APR 2 11979 v^\^ A T E S E APR 1 1 199$ DUE 3 Muf. . . lo rnOM DATERECEIVE[) BEC'O iD-URt MAYOZBBB NT ■m ...jilpSI 3 \™58 00753 ^^^^ AA 001188 281 8 ^^) ■>>;.;>; vmm> m