; OK A' AS FT! REPORT [XIVERSITY, LAND AND BUILDING PUBLISHED BV AUTHORITY. OLYMIMA, WASH.: ('. WHITE. ^TATK 1'RINTKU. STA/TE OF REPOKT OF THE UNIVERSITY LAND AND BUILDING Ci 1893. PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY. OLYMPIA, WASH. : O. C. WHITE, . . . STATE PRINTER. 1892. UP REPORT. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, Nov. 29, 1892. To the Governor: We respectfully submit herewith the report of the Board of Uni- versity Land and Building Commissioners, appointed under the act of the legislature, approved March 7, 1891, entitled "An act pro- viding for the establishment, location, maintenance and support of the University of Washington." (Session Laws, 1891, p. 229.) Pursuant to sec. 1 of said act, the board of regents of the Uni- versity, on May 12, 1891, appointed James R. Hayden, of Seattle, a member of the new board; he entered upon his duties May 16, 1891. March 14, 1891, the executive appointed John Arthur, of Seattle; John McReavy, of Union City, and Charles F. Leaven- worth, of Olympia, as members for four years. Pursuant to sec. 2, the acting governor and the members so ap- pointed by him met in the city of Seattle, at 1 P. M. , on the first Monday in April, A. D. 1891, and organized the board. They elected John Arthur, of Seattle, president pro tempore; Martin D. Smith, of Spokane, secretary; William E. Boone, of Seattle, architect and superintendent of construction. April 15, 1891, Fred G. Plummer, of Tacoma, was appointed chief engineer. Secretary Smith resigned his position June 15, 1891. Upon his resignation the board elected James R. Hayden as secretary, without salary, and authorized him to employ an assistant. DEEDS FOR OLD UNIVERSITY SITE. Immediately upon the organization of the board, one of its mem- bers was instructed to procure the deeds referred to in sec. 5 of the act creating the board, reading as follows: "SEC. 5. As soon as practicable after the original donors, their succes- sors or assigns, and the corporate authorities of the city of Seattle have executed and delivered to the Board of University Land and Building Commissioners deeds in proper form, forever quitclaiming and releasing to the State of Washington all claims of right, title interest and estate, of STATE UNIVERSITY every name and nature, they may have, as the successors in interest, or otherwise, of the town of Seattle, or any other party, in and to a certain tract of land, containing ten acres more or less, in the city of Seattle, now known and occupied as the site of the University of Washington, which said ten acre tract was conveyed to the Territory of Washington by A. A. Denny and wife, C. C. Terry and wife and Edward Lander, in April, 1861^ which deeds shall be duly recorded in the office of the county auditor, said Board of University Land and Building Commissioners shall proceed to locate the University on a tract of land not to exceed one hundred and sixty acres of the fractional school section described as follows, to wit: Section sixteen (16) in township twenty-five, north of range four east, which said fractional school section is within a radius of six miles of the present site of the University of Washington, in the city of Seattle." All those deeds were procured and filed for record within a little more than one month from the date of the organization of the board. TEN ACRE TRACT IN SEATTLE. Immediately upon the recording of the quitclaim deeds from all parties in interest to the old University site in Seattle, the board directed the chief engineer to make a careful survey of that ten acre tract and prepare a plat of it in lots and blocks, conformably to the plan of the adjoining portion of the city of Seattle. Early in the summer of 1891 he did so. The plat made by him has not been ex- ecuted by the board, for reasons stated below. In compliance with section six of the law, the acting governor ap- pointed Hon. Miles C. Moore, of Walla Walla; the mayor of Seattle appointed Hon. M.S. Drew, of Seattle; and the board appointed Rob- ert Wingate, of Tacoma, as the appraisers of the tract. Mr. Win- gate was absent from the state at the time designated for the meeting of the appraisers, and the board appointed Isaac W. An- derson, of Tacoma, in his stead. Messrs. Moore, Drew and Ander- son duly met and qualified, and organized by choosing Mr. Moore as chairman and Mr. Anderson as secretary. In August, 1891, they made an examination of the tract for the purpose of appraising it by lots, by blocks, and as a whole. At the close of the investiga- tions made by them concerning the condition of the real estate market in Seattle at that time, and the prices which could be ob- tained for lots in the University tract, we learned that their valua- tion, in detail and as a whole, would fall far below the prices for which we would consent to sell. At that time there was no activity in real property business in Seattle or in any other part of the state. There was no demand for high priced city property. LAND AND BUILDING COMMISSION. We unanimously decided to sell no part of the tract during the continuance of the financial stagnation then prevailing. We there- fore requested the appraisers to postpone the making of the appraise- ment to such time as the board should thereafter indicate. They did so. We have not yet called upon those gentlemen to complete the task which they kindly undertook for us. It will be seen by reference to section six of the act, that the board is not clothed with the discretionary power to reject all bids for the property which it considers too low. If the best bid be as high as the appraised value, the bidder is entitled to the land, even though the board deem his bid much too low. The language of the act is: "At the time appointed for the sale the board shall publicly open and announce all bids received, by mail or otherwise, and invite other bids. The highest bid made on the day of sale shall be accepted, unless it is less than the appraised value of the parcel of land bid for, in which event the board shall postpone the sale and re-advertise." We regard this want of discretionary power as a defect in the law. The board should be given authority to reject a bid for any parcel of the land, or for the whole tract, when in its judgment the price bid is inadequate; just as it has the power to reject at its dis- cretion all bids for the construction of buildings which it deems too high. This ten acre tract is the most valuable piece of property which the state possesses. It should not be sold for less than one-half million dollars ($500,000). It ought to be held until it brings from $750,000 to $1,000,000. Had the appraisement been made during the monetary depression of 1 89 1 and the property been sold as the act contemplates, it is doubt- ful whether we could have realized one hundred and fifty thousand dollars ($150,000) from it. No member of the board would give his consent to the making of such a sacrifice, even for the purpose of building a new university. Being situated in the heart of the largest city in the state, no other land owned by the state will grow so rapidly in value. With a population of one hundred thousand in Seattle this tract will bring a full million dollars. This increase of population will be realized within the next five years. The proceeds arising from the sale of this tract should be applied to the erection of the buildings needed, with the main building, to make a real university. The fund for the construction of the main building, the engine house 6 WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY and the dormitories, dining room and kitchen, and for the improve- ment of the grounds, should be provided from some other source. Sec. 17 of the enabling act of congress grants to Washington "for state charitable, educational, penal and reformatory institu- tions two hundred thousand acres" of the public lands. It is clear that no part of this grant was intended for common schools, for the scientific school or for the normal schools, or for public build- ings at the state capital. Munificent grants are provided for these institutions, and are followed by this general grant of two hundred thousand acres. One-half of this grant should be allotted to the University. With an endowment of 100,000 acres, in addition to the quantity yet to be selected under the old reservation of two townships, those buildings could be constructed, and the University grounds cleared and beautified, without trenching upon the ten acre tract in Seattle. QUANTITY OF LANDS TO BE SELECTED. Sec. 4 of the act reads as follows: "The Board of University Land and Building Commissioners are hereby authorized and directed to ascertain how much land is left of the grant made to the State of Washington for university purposes by the act of congress, commonly called the enabling act, approved February 22, A. D. 1889; how much has been selected and remains unsold; how much re- mains to be selected, and shall select the quantity yet to be selected as rapidly as possible in the manner prescribed by law." At its meeting on April 7, 1891, the board instructed one of its members "to proceed to the city of Washington and examine in the general land office the original lists of selections of lauds in the Territory of Washington for university purposes, and to procure certified copies thereof, and to do all matters and things in relation thereto which he shall find expedient and necessary." In compliance with this instruction, he went in the latter part of May, 1891, to the city of Washington and made the examination as required. He procured certified copies of the various lists of lands selected by the authorities of the Territory of Washington for university purposes under the reservation of two townships of land made by congress July 17, 1854, and the act of the legislative assembly of the Territory of Washington authorizing the sale of the lands so reserved; together with copies of documents on file in the general land office bearing upon the selection and sale of these lands by the territorial authorities, and considered important as LAND AND BUILDING COMMISSION. throwing light on the proceedings by which the State of Washing- ton has been deprived of nearly all of the forty-six thousand and eighty acres reserved by congress in 1854. At that time twenty-one lists of such selections by the territorial authorities had been approved by the land department. These lists embrace an aggregate of 44,909 ^ acres. November 4, 1891, the land department approved list No. 22 for 160 acres. This leaves one thousand and ten and r 5 o 4 o 1,010^& acres still due the state. UNSELECTED LANDS. The board has made no selection of the lands still due to the state for the University. Soon after it had ascertained the exact amount unselected, all work upon the construction of the University was stopped, as will be narrated hereafter, and the board was deprived of the means wherewith to have the lands properly examined and selected, and the necessary non-mineral affidavits made in the United States land offices. Each forty acre tract selected must be carefully examined, and the examiner must make affidavit to that fact, and also that there is not, to his knowledge, within the limits thereof, any lode or vein of quartz, or other rock in place, bearing gold, sil- ver, cinnabar, lead, tin or copper, or any deposit of coal ; that there is not, within the limits thereof, to his knowledge any placer, cement, gravel or other valuable mineral deposit; that no portion thereof is claimed for mining purposes under the local customs or rules of miners or otherwise ; that no portion thereof is worked for mineral during any portion of the year by any person or persons ; and that the land is essentially non-mineral land, and that the application therefor is not made for the purpose of fraudulently obtaining title to mineral land, but with the object of securing said land for agri- cultural purposes. The board has made unremitting efforts to se- cure such examination of the amount of lands still due to it, but has entirely failed, owing to the lack of funds wherewith to pay the necessary expenses. SELECTED LANDS UNSOLD. Shortly before the preparation of this report, Mr. Daniel Bagley, formerly president of the Board of University Commissioners, which had charge of the University lands, informed us that he had in his possession data showing that about 2,000 acres of the lands selected by the University, and approved by the land department of WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY the United States, still remain unsold. We have not yet received such data. As the matter stands, it is simply impossible for the board to determine what lands have been sold by the former author- ities, and what lands are still owned by the state for the University. The act creating this board makes no provision for the transfer to it of such records concerning those lands as remain in the possession of the board of regents. We applied to the board of regents for the delivery of those records to us. The regents, finding no authority for doing so, refused the application. Subsequently they gave us some memoranda, which are so brief, disconnected and unintel- ligible as to be worthless. The records and data which Mr. Bagley refers to are in his own possession, and have always been treated by him as his property. This board ought to have in its pos- session all existing records and data concerning the sales which have been made. This act is further defective in failing to give the board authority to sell university lands, other than the ten acre tract in Seattle. Such authority, under proper restrictions, should be conferred, un- less the legislature can, without such sales, provide the means for carrying on, during the next two years, the expensive work of con- structing a creditable university and of putting a large tract of timbered land in suitable condition therefor. LOCATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON. At its meeting on the 5th day of August, 1891, the board located the University of Washington. August 6, 1891, it adopted the fol- lowing declaration of such location: WHEREAS, The legislature of the State of Washington, by an act ap- proved on the 7th day of March, A. D. 1891, entitled, "An act providing for the establishment, location, maintenance and support of the Univer- sity of Washington," provided for the establishment of the Board of Uni- versity Land and. Building Commissioners, to be charged with the duty of carrying said act into effect; and, WHEREAS, The members of the said board were duly appointed and commissioned, as in said act provided, and duly organized said board on the 6th day of April, A. D. 1891, being the first Monday in said month, as therein provided; and, WHEREAS, The original donors, their successors and assigns, and the corporate authorities of the city of Seattle, have executed and delivered to said Board of University Land and Building Commissioners deeds in proper form, forever quitclaiming and releasing to the State of Washing- ton all claim of right, title, interest and estate, of every name and nature, LAND AND BUILDING COMMISSION. 9 they might have had as successors, in interest or otherwise, of the town of Seattle, or any other property in and to that certain tract of land, con- taining ten (10) acres, more or less, in the city of Seattle, now known and occupied as the site of the University of Washington, which said ten acre tract was conveyed to the Territory of Washington by A. A. Denny and wife, C. C. Terry and wife and Edward Lander, in April, 1861, which said deeds have been duly recorded in the records of the county of King, State of Washington; and, WHEREAS, All and singular, the provisions of the said act of the legis- lature have been by said board duly complied with and carried into effect: \'r, therefore, In consideration of the premises, the said Board of Uni- versity Land and Building Commissioners, at its regular semi-monthly meeting, held at its office in the city of Seattle, on the 5th day of August, A. D. 1891, did duly locate the University of Washington on a tract of land not exceeding 160 acres of the fractional school section, described as follows, to wit: Section 16, township 25 north of range 4 east, which said fractional school section is within a radius of six miles of the present site of the University of Washington, in the eity of Seattle, which said tract of land is more particularly described as follows, to wit: Beginning at the quarter section corner on the west boundary of section 16, town- ship 25 north, range 4 east, Willamette meridian: run thence east 32 chains, north 80 east 18.50 chains, east 6.88 chains to the shore of Lake Washington; thence with the meanders of the lake south 3 west 22.30 chains, south 1630' east 24 chains, south 36 west 8 chains, south 345' west 6.93 chains, to the fractional section corner to sections 16 and 21; thence west 27.08 chains to the fractional section corner to sections 16 and 21 on Lake Union; thence with the meanders of the lake north 25 west 20 chains, north 8330' west 4.68 chains, to the fractional section corner between sections 16 and 17; thence north 20.78 chains to the place of be- ginning, containing 160 acres, according to the government survey, and covers all of the fractional south half, and a portion of lot number 3 of said section, and fronts directly upon Lake Washington and Lake Union; and which said tract is, pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of said act, hereby forever reserved from disposal or sale, and dedicated exclusively to university educational purposes. In witness whereof , The Board of University Land and Building Com- missioners, namely, John Arthur, John McReavy, Charles F. Leaven- worth, and James R. Hayden, have hereunto set their hands and affixed the official seal of said board, this 6th day of August, A. D. 1891. JOHN ARTHUR. JOHN MCREAVY, CHARLES F. LEAVENWORTH, JAMES R. HAYDEN, Board of University Land and Building Commissioners. Done by the board: JOHN ARTHTR, President pro tewpore. Attest: JAMES R. HAYDEN, Secretary. [SEAL OF THE BOARD.] Executed in presence of W. E. Boone, Isaac W. Anderson, Jos. W. Gregory. 10 WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING, ss. This is to certify that on the 6th day of August, A. D. 1891, before me, Jos. W. Gregory, a notary public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared John Arthur, John Mc- Reavy, Charles F. Leavenworth and James R. Hayden, to me known to be the identical persons described in and who executed the foregoing in- strument, and severally acknowledged to me that they executed the same, as the Board of University Land and Building Commissioners of the State of Washington, and for and on behalf of the State of Washington, freely and voluntarily, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Witness my hand and official seal, this 6th day of August, A. D. 1891. Jos. W. GREGORY, Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing in Seattle. [NOTARIAL SEAL.] ARCHITECT'S REPORT. We present herewith the report of William E. Boone, the archi- tect (omitting the appendix and plat therein mentioned). It will be seen that it treats succinctly a genuine university system not a mere high school : To the Board of University Land and Building Commissioners of the State of Washington: GENTLEMEN In considering the question of arranging plans for the building of the University of Washington, it was deemed proper by your architect to make as complete a study as practicable of the most noted and successful universities in other portions of the country; to examine into their faults; to profit from their success, and to take advantage of the results which have been obtained by costly experiments. With this object in view, a careful canvass has been made of the various buildings con- structed elsewhere, and of their workings; and, in addition, correspond- ence and interviews have been had with well known professors of experience in their special scholastic departments. No effort has been relaxed. No subject that might possibly have a bearing upon and lead us to the success of the undertaking has been considered unworthy of con- sideration. An appendix, giving the results of our examination of other universities, is annexed to this report and made a part of it. But very few of the eastern universities have had their colleges con- structed under auspices so favorable and fortunate as those of the Uni- versity of Washington. Commenced at times when the country was not in as nourishing a condition as at present, the older universities have had their buildings added to from time to time, and new structures have been wedged in between older ones in such a heterogeneous manner that they have been rendered inconvenient, incongruous and inharmonious. In many instances, from lack of space for concentration, they have been separated for miles. It is, indeed, fortunate that the State of Washington is relieved of this serious drawback; for, with our allotment of ground, the buildings can be so planned and grouped that, when all are finished,. LAND AND BUILDING COMMISSION. they will form a complete and symmetrical system. The requirements of the present must not abridge the wants of the future. Topographical difficulties have been considered closely. They need never stand in the way of placing other buildings, in the future, one after another, as they may be found desirable, in eligible, orderly and symme- trical relation and connection with those earlier provided. The University of Washington will occupy an exceptionally advantageous position in healthfuluess and accessibility; to say nothing of the beauty and grandeur of the adjacent lakes and gracefully rounded hills and serrated mountain crests, clothed with primeval forests, which are ever in full view. What others have done in some rich communities is tame and insipid in com- parison with what nature has here furnished without cost. In the loca- tion of the buildings, these considerations have not been neglected. There are all around the buildings such views as, for variety and grandeur, can rarely be met with. These, if preserved, will confer upon the University a character of unrivaled beauty and attractive interest. With this brief introduction, let me explain the plan proposed for the buildings which shall constitute the University of Washington. A plat of the ground, upon which the various colleges are proposed to be located, is herewith submitted for your approval and adoption. Water must be bountifully provided, either from Lake Washington or by artesian work, and stored in tank reservoir; in which case a water tower must be constructed in a central location, so that all buildings may be supplied economically by pressure. This tower would be better lo- cated near the buildings in which are placed the boilers for heating. It is proposed to heat the buildings by steam; the boilers in batteries to be as central as possible. The boilers and engines are located in a portion of the building arranged for the manual training department. It is proposed to light the buildings and grounds by electricity. A sys- tem of sewerage must be thoroughly considered as soon as the need there- for shall have arisen. No natural barrier exists to prevent proper flow and flush. Upon entering the grounds, the first college approached is BIOLOGICAL HALL. Here the student must acquaint himself with the problems which have to do with the life, growth and reproduction of plants and animals; with the structure, origin and composition of the soil; with the varying con- ditions of the air; and, in general, with the great forces of nature. In the Basement are proposed to be arranged the testing room, crematory, propagating rooms, vivisection room, store rooms, work rooms, toilet rooms and head gardener's office. First Floor: Departments of agriculture, horticulture, botany, arbori- culture, with professors' rooms; herbarium, lecture rooms, class rooms, library, aquarium, general museum and the various laboratories and cabinets. Second Floor: Gallery of general museum, zoological and entomologi- 12 WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY cal laboratories, lecture and class rooms, professors 1 rooms. About ten acres of ground should be allotted for the accommodation of glass struct- ures, outdoor aquarium, arboretum, rockeries, ferneries and ornamental grounds. The next building approached is CHEMICAL HALL. This building is being planned after a careful study of the newest and best arranged laboratories of Europe and this country, covering arrange- ments for equipping it throughout with approved apparatus in the most thorough manner. The work rooms convenient, commodious, well lighted and adapted to the study of chemistry in all its branches. Each room to have its ventilating hoods, steam and sand baths, drying ovens, filtering pumps, etc. Each table to be supplied with a complete set of re-agents, gas and running water, supplied through glass or tinned pipes. Basement: A large general laboratory in which eighty students can be provided with conveniences for work at the same time. Adjacent are rooms for storage of apparatuses and chemicals, and for assaying, com- bustion and distilling; repairing and testing rooms. First Floor : Qualitative laboratory for thirty-two students at one time, lecture room and class room, special analytical laboratory, room for an- alysis of gases, store rooms and museums. Second Floor: Lecture room capable of seating two hundred and fifty students, qualitative laboratory with tables for thirty students, library, balance room, professors' study rooms and special laboratories, store rooms and apparatus rooms, dark and photographic rooms. HALL OF LAW AND MEDICINE. This college to contain rooms for professors, lecture and class rooms, law library, reading and consultation rooms, toilet rooms, storage rooms, medical library, theatre, crematory, museum, laboratories, dispensary and consulting rooms. ADMINISTRATION AND BELLES LETTHKS. This building, to be first constructed, requires a more extended de- scription, because fully developed. It has a frontage of 276 feet and 60 feet wide, with wings thrown back at the flanks, each 28x35, and the as- sembly hall placed in the center and to the rear 74 x 116. Basement: Eleven feet high, contains four class rooms 20x22, four class rooms 20x23, two class rooms 20x24, two lecture rooms 24 x33, two professors' rooms 10x12, one professor's room 20x31, one cloak room 11 x20, three cloak rooms 8'6"x20, one janitor's room 20x20, and another 10x20, two toilet rooms each 24x33, engineer's room 14x14, boiler and fuel rooms 34x45 and 14 x 14, and a room under the assembly hall 63x70, which temporarily may be occupied for gymnastic purposes. There are eight entrances to this story. First Story: Fourteen feet 6 inches high, contains two class rooms 20 x 24, four class rooms 20 x 23, one class room 20 x 22, four lecture rooms 24x33, two professors' rooms 12 x 16'6", two cloak rooms 8'6"x20, faculty LAND AND BUILDING COMMISSION. 13 room 10x22, regents' and commissioners' room 20x22, room for secre tary and treasurer 20x23, vault 8x8, president's room 20x20, and an- other 12x21, reception room 20x31, ladies' retiring room 11x12, parlor 20 x 23, library 22 x 20, assembly hall 70 x 76, two dressing rooms 14 x 14. This hall, arranged with sloping floors and seating, which, together with gallery, will accommodate fifteen hundred, stage seating two hun- dred and fifty. Special entrances are provided for the stage and dressing or retiring rooms. The foyers are large, light and airy. Proper thought has been bestowed upon the acoustic ventilation and lighting, also upon ingress and egress. The main foyer on the first floor is directly approach- able from the main entrance to building, and is surrounded by a foyer gallery on the second floor which opens directly from the gallery of the assembly hall. These foyers are served with daylight from a domical skylight, being open to the roof. There are provided nine external en- trances to this story. Two stairways within the assembly hall, and three commodious stair- ways from the corridors conduct to the Second Story: Fourteen feet six inches high, which contains two lecture rooms 24 x33, two preparatory rooms 24x48, two class rooms 16x24, four class rooms 22x20, four class rooms 20x23, one class room 20x31, three cloak rooms 8'6"x20, one cloak room 11x20, two cloak rooms 7x15' 6", two professors' rooms 10x12, one professor's room 20x20, ante room 12x14. It has been thought advisable, as this building must be occupied by other departments until their special colleges are erected the construction of which must necessarily be delayed to finish the roof story. This will finish twelve feet high, and may contain the same number of rooms as are provided for the second floor. These will all be well lighted and ac- cessible. To recapitulate: Including upper story, accommodations are provided for 10 lecture rooms, 36 class rooms, 13 professors' rooms, 18 cloak rooms, 2 janitors' rooms, 1 engineer's room, besides preparatory rooms and large toilet service, and rooms for the regents and commissioners, president, faculty, secretary and treasurer; reception and parlors, library, assem- bly and retiring, and one large storage room, connecting with secretary's room, for stationery, etc. It is the intention to make this building (and in fact all buildings ex- cept residences) essentially fire proof, constructing the outer walls of stone, the inner walls of brick, and facing all outer walls on the inside with porus terra cotta or hollow brick, using steel beams and porus terra cotta for the floors, and iron roof for the assembly hall. The corridor and vestibule floors are to be tiled. The exterior is of simple design, in Schol- astic Gothic, and constructed with a light colored stone laid up in rock face, the only emphasis being made in the tower. The tower should con- tain the great bell of the University, and a good clock with proper dials; these dials, of glass, to be illuminated at night, as they will be seen for a long distance. It is proposed to use slate or tiles for the roofs. A com- plete set of plans accompany this report. WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY The next building in order of location is the HALL OF MATHEMATICS AND OF MINES. This building is to accommodate the departments of mathematics, civil and electrical engineering, mineralogy, metallurgy and geology, and to provide class and lecture rooms, professors' rooms, laboratories, library for each department, general museum, apparatus rooms, repair- ing and drawing rooms, toilet and storage rooms. Then comes the ART BUILDING. To provide for the departments of architecture, painting, sculpture, music, drawing, with professors, class lecture and modeling rooms; library, studios for painting; piano rooms, specially planned to retain the sound within themselves; music hall, with organ; art gallery, arranged for the display of paintings, drawings, photos and models; repairing and storage rooms. It is proposed to arrange the plan of this building so that the court between the wings may be economically enclosed and roofed, thus securing a grand opportunity for a commodious art gallery or hall. GENERAL LIBRARY. This building is arranged for a stack and reading room, librarian's room, card and catalogue rooms, special students' room, faculty rooms, rooms for maps, periodicals and newspapers; toilet rooms, bindery, work, package and storage rooms. GYMNASIUM. Placed facing the campus, this building will contain rooms for the pro- fessors of physical culture and gymnastics, of military science and tactics, and instructor in gymnastics; gymnasium, about45x90; drill room, same size; band and military store room; armory rooms for fencing, sparring and weighing; swimming tank, about 16x50, with dressing rooms and lockers, and about twenty bath rooms; linen closets; toilet rooms; bowl- ing alley, 70 feet long; rowing tank; bicycle racks; running track and gallery for visitors, and a baseball cage. Not very far from this building should be the baseball and cricket grounds, having a public stand struct- ure of neat design. All the buildings which have been described, includ- ing the observatory, face the main driveway and the campus. The campus will be about thirty acres in extent. OBSERVATORY. This building will contain professors' rooms, library, clock room, com- puting rooms, transit room, meteorological room and dome, with repair- ing and store rooms. It will be located at a sufficiently remote point from the railroad to escape magnetic and vibratory disturbance. DORMITORIES AND DINING HALL. The dormitory for women is to consist of a basement, first, second and attic story, and to contain gymnasium and physical culture room, labora- tory with greenhouse attached, lecture room, parlors, museum or cabinet, matron's and housekeeper's rooms, servants' rooms, linen, bedding and storage rooms, chute for soiled linen directly to basement; toilet rooms, LAND AND BUILDING COMMISSION. 15 sewing room, dormitories en suite, consisting of study room, about 12 x 15, and two bed rooms, each 9x15, with closets. The grounds which adjoin, to be prepared for archery practice and tennis, with walks leading to pleasant spots, for the purpose of inviting and encouraging ourdoor ex- ercise. The dormitory for men is to be arranged purely for sleeping pur- poses, with all the attendant conveniences; and to consist of basement, first, second and attic stories. The dining hall is to be built between the dormitories, and to consist of basement and one high story, providing for servants, storage, fuel, coal, sewing, toilet and sundry other rooms in basement; also laundry, ironing and drying rooms. The dining hall or room, about 45x125, will contain kitchen, serving room, scullery, china and other pantries adjoining. The vegetable or root cellar is to be entirely outside of the building. To the rear of this building, and near the laun- dry are large grass spaces for bleaching purposes, excluded from public sight by plantations of shrubbery. The wagon road also approaches the kitchen, and is shut out from sight by similar planting. CHAPEL. A site is reserved for this structure; it is located near the dormatories. MANUAL TRAINING HALL. This building is located as centrally as the topography of the grounds will permit, and will contain iron working room, about 50x60; forge room, about 30x60; wood working room, 50x60; painting room, 20x40, with two rooms adjoining; drawing, lecture and professors' rooms; lab- oratory, tool and grinding rooms; pattern, finishing and carving rooms; lumber room; storage sheds; toilet rooms; experimental rooms; machine shop, stonecutting and bricklaying sheds. The site upon which this building is placed falls gradually to the rear. This allows of the boiler rooms being placed in the basement, which will be several feet below the level of the other buildings; here it is proposed to place the battery of boilers which shall generate heat for the entire group of buildings of the university. Here also are to be placed the en- gines for power, and dynamos for illumination of both buildings and grounds. Engineer's rooms and fuel rooms will, of course, be provided. The water tower is placed within the court formed by the extending sheds. Spur tracks connect the railroad and this court. THE STABLES Are to the rear of all the buildings, and not far from the dock. A wagon road leads from the dock and the stables to the manual training building and kitchen, and will be so conducted that, by judicious plant- ing, the character of its uses will not offend the eye. BOAT HOUSE. As rare opportunities will be afforded the students, by the proximity of Lake Washington, for aquatic sports, it is proposed, at a fitting point, to construct a boat house with all the proper conveniences for the enjoy- ment of this royal and heathful sport. Pathways skirting the lake front- 16 WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY age are so arranged that fully ten thousand people having equal views can enjoy the regattas and scull races without obstruction. I have considered the advantages of dockage, gravel and sand pits, water conveyance to the various buildings, sewerage and ventilation. I have endeavored to keep in view in the construction of these buildings everything conducive to the attainment of a harmonious and symmetrical whole, such as will justify us in considering the University of Washington as one of the most attractive institutions in the United States. Having considered the faults and shortcomings, and studied the best results obtained in the various departments of eastern universities, I have confidence that the people of one of the youngest states in the union will have for their university a series of buildings which will furnish a model for older commonwealths. Second only in importance to the proper planning of the colleges is the consideration of the approaches to them, and of the treatment of the surroundings. If the grounds which surround the structure are out of harmony, in- congruity results. To consider both the building and the site together involves a wider range of view than most architects take; to secure ex- cellence in both, foresight and skill are required. Only a study of the art of landscape gardening can give this. A building badly placed, when it might be well placed and surrounded, is incomplete; one is apt to find the entrances placed where they will necessitate inconvenient approaches; these, in their turn, spoiling the grounds, by preventing the best arrange- ment of lawns and plantations. The more magnificent the architecture, the more does it need this graceful drapery of plantation for its best capacity of expression. Real landscape art is nothing if it is not broad, simple and conservative of natural beauty. The site we are dealing with is so replete with natural advantages of surface, broad water prospects, and grand mountain views, that a failure to group the buildings and grounds together in perfect harmony would be a matter for lasting re- gret. The approaches or driveways should lead to their objective points with directness and without superfluous flourish; they should command the most impressive views, developed here and there by judicious thin- ning of foliage, disclosing hidden visions of water and blue distance. Our grounds are of sufficient extent to yield distinctive landscape char- acter. The development of these characteristics, in a fuller measure, should be accomplished by softening what is hard, clothing what is bare, tilling out what is meagre, and enriching what is beautiful; all in har- mony with the original type. This will exclude as incongruous what is merely novel or eccentric, and subordinate what is obviously artificial to what is natural. Then, with proper regard to the location, grouping and sky lines of the buildings; the broad and natural undulations of surface; easy grades of the driveways; simple embellishments of the water fronts; a result will be obtained, the very strength of which will lie in its natural simplicity. All of which is respectfully submitted. WILLIAM E. BOONE, Architect for the University of Washington. SEATTLE, Aug. 19, 1891. LAND AND BUILDING COMMISSION. 17 ADOPTION OF PLANS, ETC. INVITING BIDS. In order that the plans and specifications prepared by the archi- tect should be approved and adopted by a full board, the meeting of August 20, 1891, was held in the governor's office in Olympia. The minutes of the meeting read as follows : The meeting was called to order by the president ex officio, Elisha P. Ferry. There were present : Elisha P. Ferry, John Arthur, James R. Hayden,. Charles F. Leavenworth, John McReavy. The minutes of the previous meeting were read, and on motion, unani- mously approved. Mr. Leavenworth moved, seconded by Mr. Hayden, that the board adopt the report, plans, drawings and specifications for the University of Washington, submitted to the board by the architect, William E. Boone, and that the board forthwith advertise for proposals for the materials and labor necessary in the construction of the main university building (spoken of in said report as the administration and belles lettres building). The motion was unanimously adopted, the following named members voting in the affirmative : John Arthur, James R. Hayden, Charles F. Leavenworth, John McReavy, Elisha P. Ferry. Mr. Arthur moved, seconded by Mr. McReavy, that the notice to con- tractors for the materials and labor necessary in the construction of the main university building, be published for four weeks, daily and consecu- tively, in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, the Tacoma Ledger, the Spokane Chronicle, and the W^alla Walla Statesman. The motion was unanimously adopted., the following named members voting in the affirmative : John Arthur, James R. Hayden, Charles F. Leavenworth, John McReavy, Elisha P. Ferry. And it was moved and seconded that the following form of notice to contractors be adopted : NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS. Notice is given, that the Board of University Land and Building Com- missioners of the State of Washington hjreby invite separate sealed pro- posals : First, for the materials; secondly, for the labor, necessary in the construction of the main university building (to wit. the building for administration and belles lettres) on the site located therefor in section 16, township '25, north of range 4 east, in King county, Washington, in accordance with the plans, other drawings and specifications therefor, adopted by said board, and which will be found at the office of Boone & Willcox, architects, in rooms 58, 59 and 60, in the Boston block, corner Sec- ond and Columbia streets, Seattle, Washington, on and after September 1, 1891. Said proposals to be filed with the secretary of the board, James R. Hayden, in Seattle, on or before Thursday, September 24, 1891, at the hour of one o'clock p. m. t at which time all proposals will be opened pub- licly by the board in its office, rooms 307 and 308 Butler block. Seattle. All contractors must be citizens of the State of Washington. The board has the right to reject any and all proposals. Each proposal must be accompanied by a certified check in the sum of ten thousand dollars 18 WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY '($10,000) to be forfeited upon the inability of the bidder to furnish satis- factory bonds. Proposals must be indorsed upon the envelope, "Sealed proposals for the building of the building of the University of Wash- ington." ELISHA P. FERRY, Governor and President, ex officio, JOHN ARTHUR, JOHN MCREAVY, CHARLES F. LEAVENWORTH, JAMES R. HAYDEN. Board of University Land and Building Commissioners. Dated at Seattle, Wash., August 20, A. D. 1891. BIDS FOR MAIN BUILDING. September 24, 1891, the board met and opened the bids. From the minutes of the meeting we quote the following : The secretary laid before the board satisfactory proof that the invita- tion for proposals for the labor and materials necessary in the construc- tion of the main university building had been duly published, daily, for four (4) weeks, consecutively, in the Seattle Post- Intelligencer, the Ta- coma Ledger, the Spokane Chronicle, and the Walla W'alla Statesman. Thereupon, on motion, it was unanimously resolved by the board that said publication was made according to law. At 1 o'clock P. M., the secretary publicly, in presence of the several bidders and many others, opened all proposals for the labor and material necessary in the construction of the main university building, which had been filed with them, which proposals were as follows, to wit: SEATTLE, W r ASH., September 24, 1891. The Board of University Land and Building Commissioners: GENTLEMEN According to the plans and specifications prepared by William E. Boone, architect, I propose to furnish all material required for the sum of ($400,399 ) four hundred thousand three hundred and ninety- nine dollars, delivered at the building. I will take this material, delivered by myself, and set it in place for the sum of ($160,112 ) one hundred and sixty thousand one hundred and twelve dollars. These two bids are co-relative and must not be considered individually, and must be together rejected or accepted. This bid is for the Sucia Island stone and acme plaster. Yours truly, CHARLES H. BEBB. P. S. The above bid is for the administration and belles lettres build- ing. CHAS. H. BEBB. SEATTLE, WASH., Sept. 24, 1891. The Board of University Land and Building Commissioners: GENTLEMEN According to the plans and specifications prepared by William E. Boone, architect, for the Administration and Belles Lettres building, I propose to erect the same, furnishing all the labor and mate- rial, for the sum of five hundred and thirty-nine thousand five hundred and eleven ($539,511) dollars. This bid is for the building complete, according to the specifications, and includes all labor and material taken together under one contract. Yours truly, CHARLES H. BEBB. LAND AND BUILDING COMMISSION. 19 SEATTLE, WASH., Sept. 24, 1891. To the Honorable Board of University Land and Building Commissioners of the State of Washington: I propose to furnish for the main university building, to wit: the build- ing for administration and belles lettres, ajl of the required materials of their several kinds, in accordance with the plans and specifications, and delivered on the grounds or site, for the consideration of (350,000) dollars in U.S. gold coin. I also propose to perform all of the labor on the materials in construc- tion of the above building, in accordance with the plans and specifications Srepared by W. E. Boone, architect, for the consideration of (215,000) ollars, U. S. gold coin. I must have the contract on both labor and ma- terials, or nothing. Yours truly, JAMES PARKE. Will furnish any sandstone that the board may select. JAMES PARKE. To the Honorable Board of University Land and Building Commissioners of the State of Washington : GENTLEMEN We propose to furnish all the material for the university building as per plans and specifications for the sum of ($368,000) three hundred and sixty-eight thousand dollars. Will do the labor as per plans and specifications for ($111,400) one hundred eleven thousand four hun- dred dollars. This bid not to be separated but to be considered as one. This proposal is for Sucia Island stone. If any other stone is selected will add ten thousand dollars ($10,000) to bid as per plans and specifica- tions prepared by W. E. Boone, architect. Respectfully submitted, LILLIS & Goss. SEATTLE, WASH., Sept. 24, 1891. Board of Regents, Administration and Belles Lettres Building, Seattle, Wash.: GENTLEMEN We hereby propose to furnish all labor according to plans and specifications prepared by W. E. Boone, architect, for the erection of the above building for two hundred seventy-eight thousand four hun- dred and fifty ($278,450) dollars. This bid is accompanied by a bid for materials and is to be accepted only with material bid. It is understood that the bids of this firm are to be accepted or rejected together. Very respectfully, MALLORY, VAN FOSSEN & SPRAGUE. SEATTLE, WASH., Sept. 24, 1891. Board of Regents of Administration and Belles Lettres Building, Seattle, Wash.: GENTLEMEN We hereby prospose to furnish all materials according to plans and specifications prepared by W. E. Boone, architect, for the erection of the above building, using Vantine or Tenino stone, for the sum of three hundred sixty-eight thousand two hundred and thirty ($368,230) dollars. Fifteen thousand ($15,000) [dollars] to be added for Wilkeson or Pittsburg stone. This bid is accompanied by a labor bid and is to be accepted only with the labor bid. Very respectfully, MALLORY, VAN FOSSEN & SPRAGUE. SEATTLE, Sept. 24, 1891. To the Honorable Board of University Land and Building Commissioners : GENTLEMEN We, the undersigned, respectfully submit the following propositions for the labor and materials necessary for the erection and completion of the state [university] to be erected in King county, State of 20 WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY Washington, according to plans made for the same by architects, Messrs. Boone & Wilcox. First: For all materials, ($410, 000) four hundred and ten thousand dol- lars. Second: For all labor, ($240,000) two hundred and forty thousand dol- lars. Thirdly: For all materials and labor throughout for the sum of six hundred and eighteen thousand dollars ($618,000). This proposition is conditioned that we will not take labor without we have the furnishing of all materials or "vice versa." Enclosed find cer- tified check, $20,000. Very respectfully submitted, JNO. T. LONG & Co. P. S. Our figures are based on blue sandstone from quarries named in specifications, or white sandstone [ from] the Star quarry. For Wilkeson or Pittsburg stone, add to our figures ($20,000) twenty thousand dollars. Respectfully, JNO. T. LONG & Co. It was moved by Mr. Hayden, seconded by Mr. McReavy, that each and all of the bids just read to the board be rejected, and that the certified checks severally accompanying them be returned to the parties, respect- ively, enclosing the same, for the reasons: First, That each of said bids is conditional in respect to the letting of the contracts for the labor and material together to one and the same bidder; and, second, that each of said bids is, by the board, deemed too high. The motion was unanimously adopted, the following named members voting in the affirmative: James R. Hayden, Charles F. Leaven worth, John McReavy, John Arthur. The secretary thereupon delivered up all of said certified checks to the parties who, respectively, inclosed the same to him. BIDS FOR MATERIALS INVITED. The board met on the next day and took the action set forth in the following extract from the minutes of the meeting: It was moved by Mr. Leavenworth, seconded by Mr. McReavy, that the board adopt the following preamble and resolution: WHEREAS, The board has rejected each' and all of the bids opened by it September 24, A. D., 1891. for the construction of the main university building, for the reasons: First, That each of said bids is conditional in respect to the letting of the contracts for the labor and material together to one and the same bidder; and, secondly, that each of said bids is by the board deemed too high; and WHEKEAS, The board is satisfied, after consultation with the architect, that it will be impracticable to obtain, upon a re-advertisement for like bids, any absolute, unconditional bids by responsible contractors, for the labor separately, and for the materials separately, for said building, and is further satisfied that, if any such bids were obtained, they would be at figures too high for the work, by reason of such separation of bids; and WHEREAS, The board is satisfied, after careful consideration of the subject with the architect, that said building can be erected by the board, under the immediate control and management of the architect and super- intendent of construction, William E. Boone, at a large saving of money to the state, and with greater assurance of good and substantial work, by the board's purchasing all the materials therefor, and employing the labor necessary in the construction thereof; therefore, LAND AND BUILDING COMMISSION. 21 Resolved, That this board shall not advertise again for separate bids for the labor, and separate bids for the materials for the whole building, but, instead thereof, shall immediately advertise for bids for all the stone, concrete stone, sand, brick, cement and lime necessary for said building; and shall, upon procuring satisfactory bids for the same, purchase said materials and proceed immediately with the construction of said build- ing, under the direct management of said architect and superintendent of construction. Be it further liesolved, That invitations for proposals to furnish said stone, concrete stone, sand, brick, cement and lime, shall be immediately published for four weeks, consecutively, in the Seattle Telegraph, the Ta'coma Mews, the Spokane Review and the Walla Walla Union-Journal, and that the date of opening all such proposals shall be 1 o'clock p. M., on Thursday, the 29th day of October, A. D. 1891. The preamble and resolutions were unanimously adopted, the follow- ing named members voting in the affirmative: James R. Hayden, Charles F. Leaven worth, John McReavy, John Arthur. It was moved by Mr. Leavenworth, seconded by Mr. Hayden, that the secretary be directed to publish daily, for four weeks, consecutively, in the Seattle Telegraph, the Tacoma News, the Spokane Review, and the Walla Walla Union- Journal, the following notice to contractors, to wit: NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS. SEATTLE, Sept. 26, 1891. Notice is given that the Board of University Land and Building Com- missioners of the State of Washington hereby invites separate sealed pro- posals for Firstly : The stone and concrete stone; Secondly : The brick; Thirdly: The sand; Fourthly : The lime; and, Fifthly: The cement required in the construction of the main uni- versity building (to wit: the building for administration and belles let- tres), on the site located therefor, in section sixteen, township twenty-five, north of range four east, in King county, Washington, in accordance with the plans, other drawings and specifications therefor, which will be found at the office of Boone & Willcox, architects, in rooms 58, 59 and 60 Boston block, corner Second and Columbia streets, Seattle. Said proposals to be filed with the secretary of the board, James R. Hayden, of Seattle, on or before Thursday, October 29, 1891, at the hour of 1 'o'clock p. M., at which hour all proposals will be opened publicly by the board, in its office in the Butler block, corner Second and James streets, Seattle. All con- tractors must be citizens of the State of Washington. The board has the right to reject any and all proposals. Every contractor whose bill shall be accepted must'execute a bond satisfactory to the board for the faithful performance of the contract. Proposals should be indorsed upon the en- velopes: "Sealed proposal for material for the construction of the Uni- versity of Washington." ELISHA P. FERRY, Governor and President ex officio, JOHN ARTHUR, JOHN MCREAVY, CHARLES F. LEAVENWORTH, JAMES R. HAYDEN, Board of University Land and Building Commissioners. 22 WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY AUDITOR'S REFUSAL TO ISSUE WARRANTS. Before the time arrived for the new bids to be opened, legal com- plications over the want of a specific appropriation in the act arose. They are set forth in the following extract from the minutes of the meeting of the board on October 8, 1891: The secretary submitted to the board a letter from the state auditor, reading as follows: STATE OF WASHINGTON, AUDITOR'S OFFICE, OLYMPIA, October 7, 1891. Hon. James R. Hayden, Secretary University Land and Building Commis- sioners, Seattle, Washington: DEAR SIR A day or two since Mr. Leaven worth handed me a number of vouchers, issued by your commission, and requested me to issue war- rants on same and forward them to you. For several days past I have been looking up the question as to the legality of the issuance of warrants on the University fund. I have con- sulted'several authorities in the matter, and in two or three cases, carry- ing with "them exactly the same points at issue as this case of ours, the court held that the warrant could not be legally drawn; therefore re- fusing the writ of mandamus to compel the auditor to issue his warrant. With the facts that I now have before me, I do not care to take the re- sponsibility upon myself to issue the warrants, and must suspend them until such a time as the attorney general or the supreme court can pass upon the question of the legality of their issuance. The attorney general will be in Olympia at an early date, when the matter will be brought to his attention. Yours respectfully, T. M. REED, State Auditor. M. E. R. On motion of Mr. Hayden, seconded by Mr. Leavenworth, the letter was received and placed on tile, and the secretary directed to spread it at large upon the minutes of this meeting. Mr. Hayden moved, seconded by Mr. Leavenworth, the adoption of the following preamble and resolution, to wit: WHEREAS, At its regular meeting on the 12th day of August, 1891, this board adopted the following resolution: Resolved, That whereas, his excellency the governor of the state has found it impracticable to attend this meeting of the board; and WHEREAS, The time has arrived for the adoption of the plans sub- mitted by the architect, and it is expedient and proper that said plans and report be submitted to a full meeting of the board: Therefore, This board shall, before the adjournment of this session, proceed in a body, with the assistant secretary, C. E. Benjamin, and the architect and engineer, to the city of Olympia, for the purpose of confer- ring with the governor upon said plans and report, and holding a session with him at the capital for that purpose; and when the board takes a re- cess to-morrow, it shall be to meet at Olympia, at 7:30 P. M., August 20, A. D. 1891, at the office of the governor; and WHEREAS, On the 20th day of August, 1891, the board, pursuant to said resolution, proceeded in a body to the city of Olympia and held a meet- ing with the governor, all the members being present, at 7:30 o'clock p. M.; and WHEREAS, At said meeting with the governor and at the adjourned meeting with him on the 21st day of August, 1891, he unreservedly con- LAND AND BUILDfNU COMMISSION. curred with the board in its resolution to proceed with the construction, of the main university building for the University of Washington, and then and there signed, with the other members of the board, a notice to contractors, inviting proposals for furnishing of materials and the per- formance of the labor for such construction, and then and there con- curred with the board in adopting the report, plans, drawings and speci- fications for the University of Washington, submitted to the board by the architect, William E. Booue; and \VHEREAS, At said meeting on the 21st day of August, 1891, the state auditor, Hon. Thomas M. Reed, was present, and was made fully ac- quainted with all of the aforesaid resolution, acts and proceedings of the board; and WHEREAS, He and the governor, after careful consideration of the act creating this board, then and there stated that in their judgment it was the imperative duty of the board to proceed without delay in the con- struction of said main university building, and then and there agreed and concurred with the appointed members of this board that it was the duty of the state auditor to issue warrants for such indebtedness as should thereby be created; and WHEREAS, This board, after such conference with the governor and state auditor, and their full agreement and concurrence as aforesaid, has since proceeded in good faith with such work of construction, and the. indebtedness thereby incurred by it has been provided for regularly by- state warrants issued by said state auditor without objection on his part; and WHEREAS, Said state auditor, in person, on the 10th day of September,. 1891, went upon said university grounds and witnessed the work done under the supervision of the board in the preparation of said grounds for said building, and then and there expressed his approval of the same,. and his concurrence in all that the board had done and was doing in re- lation thereto: Now, therefore, Be it resolved, that it is the sense of this board that the state auditor has by his said concurrence in the action and course of this board in relation to said university building, and by his retraction thereof as set forth in the letter from him spread upon the minutes of this meet- ing, placed the board and its agents and employes in an embarrassing position, and that if the position indicated in his said letter be persisted in, it will be impossible to carry out the command of the legislature to proceed with the construction of said university building and have the same ready for occupancy on the first day of March, 1893. Be it further resolved. That the secretary of this board be directed to transmit immediately to his excellency the governer, a telegraphic mes- sage as follows: SEATTLE, WASH., Octobers, 1891. Gov. E. P. FERRY, Olympia, Wash.: University board in session. Can you meet with it in Seattle to- morrow at 1 P. M ? If not, board will meet with you in Olympia 7 o'clock to-morrow evening. Answer quick. JAMES R. HAYDEN, Secretary. The resolution was unanimously adopted, the following named mem- bers voting in the affirmative: James R. Hayden, Charles F. Leaven- worth, John Arthur. In answer to the foregoing telegram, the secretary received the follow- ing message from his excellency the governor: OLYMPIA, WASH., Octobers, 1891. J. R. HAYDEN, Seattle: \ cannot leave to-morrow. Will be glad to meet the board here. ELISHA P. FERRY. WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY Mr. Hayden moved, seconded by Mr. Leaven worth, the adoption of the following resolution: Resolved, That by reason of the inability of the governor to attend the meeting cf the board in Seattle to-morrow, as indicated by his message just received by the secretary, and by reason of the inability of the attor- ney general to meet with the board this week, as indicated by a telegram from him al-ready on tile, and because of the great importance of definitely ascertaining at once the attitude of the governor and of the state auditor in relation to the incurring of further indebtedness in the construction of the University of Washington, this board shall, to-morrow, proceed in a body to the city of Olympia and confer with the governor and state auditor on all questions affecting the work of construction. Resolved further, That the assistant secretary, C. E. Benjamin, shall accompany the board to Olympia and take with him the record of the proceedings of the board. tiesolved further, That the board now take a recess to meet in Olympia, with the governor and state auditor, at 7 P. M., Friday, October 9, 1891, and that the state auditor be requested to attend said meeting. The resolution was unanimously adopted. THE WORK STOPPED. In accordance with the foregoing resolutions, the board went to Olympia and held a meeting with the governor and auditor on October 9th. The proceedings are set forth in the minutes as follows : The board met in the office of the governor, in pursuance of a resolu- tion adopted by it, at its office in Seattle, on the 8th day of October, 1891. The meeting was called to order at 7 o'clock p. M. by the president ex officio, Governor Elisha P. Ferry. There were present: Governor Elisha P. Ferry, John Arthur, James R. Hayden, Charles F. Leavenworth, John McReavy. The state auditor, Hon. T. M. Reed, was also present, and remained throughout the meeting. Upon the suggestion of Mr. Hayden, the object of the meeting was stated by Mr. Arthur to be the holding of a conference with the governor and state auditor in relation to the subject-matter of the auditor's letter of October 7, 1891, to the secretary of the board, announcing that he would suspend the issuing of further warrants upon the university fund until such a time as the attorney general or the supreme court can pass upon the question of the legality of their issuance. The governor stated that he had, up to the time of meeting, received no official information of the action of the auditor, as expressed by the letter above mentioned; and that the only information whatever that he had thereon was obtained from the public press. A general discussion followed, in the course of which Messrs. Arthur, Hayden, Leavenworth and McReavy, in turn, stated that the board felt greatly embarrassed and disconcerted by the action of the state auditor, inasmuch as the board had in good faith, after full conference with the governor and auditor on the 20th and 21st of August, 1891, and the adop- tion of the plans for the main university building, proceeded with the pre- LAND AND BUILDING COMMISSION. 25 liminary work in the construction of said building, and had now engaged upon said work a force of over one hundred men, together with teams and scrapers and a stump puller, all at an expense aggregating $350 per day, and that the work was being carried on rapidly, and that there is now due the laborers employed therein over five thousand dollars which it would be a great hardship and wrong to withhold from them; and further, that if the suspension of the issuance of warrants be persisted in by the auditor the board will have to stop all work upon the grounds and lose the benefit of the good weather now prevailing; and that in such event it will be im- possible to construct the building within the time prescribed by the legis- lature. The auditor then addressed the meeting, and stated he had slowly, re- luctantly and deliberately reached the conclusion expressed in his letter of October 7, 1891, and that he would not, even upon the advice of the at- torney general to do so, issue any more warrants until the supreme court should have decided that he had a lawful right to issue them. He stated that he had examined decisions in analogous cases in other states, and was satisfied that, under our constitution, his right to issue such warrants was in serious doubt, and that he would adhere firmly to his decision. Thereupon Mr. Arthur moved, seconded by Mr. McReavy, the adoption of the following preamble and resolution: WHEREAS, The state auditor is in doubt as to his right, under the con- stitution of the state, to issue warrants for the payment of the indebted- ^ness incurred in the construction of the University of Washington, by v reason of the absence of a specific appropriation of money therefor, and has consequently refused to issue any more such warrants; 'therefore, be it Resolved, That this board forthwith suspend the further construction of the University of Washington. Resolved further, That the chief engineer forthwith take charge of all the tools and materials belonging to the state which are in use on the University grounds, and keep them safely until further instruction from the board*. The resolution was unanimously adopted, the following named mem- bers voting in the affirmative: John Arthur, James R. Hayden, Charles F. Leavenworth, John McReavy, Elisha P. Ferry. Thereupon the auditor stated to the board that, since it had resolved to stop all work immediately, and since the suspension or withholding of the warrants for the work done for the board in September would inflict great hardship and wrong upon those in the employ of the board, he would assume the responsibility of delivering to the board the warrants in payment for all work done up to and including the 30th day of Septem- ber, 1891; and further stated that all said warrants had already been actually drawn and were in his safe ready for delivery. BIDS FOR MATERIALS RETURNED, UNOPENED. The board met on October 29th to open the bids for materials -called for after the rejection of all the bids first tendered. The 26 WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY action which it took is shown by the following extract from the minutes: Mr. Hayden moved, seconded by Mr. Leavenworth, the adoption of the following resolution: WHEREAS, The work upon the construction of the University of Wash- ington has been suspended, owing to the refusal of the auditor to issue any more warrants upon the university fund, and the refusal of the treas- urer to indorse the same; and WHEREAS, The board will be unable to proceed with the work in the construction of the main university building, until the supreme court of the state has declared that there is a proper appropriation therefor; and WHEREAS, It would be unfair to those tendering bids that such bids should now be opened, while it is impracticable to accept any of them: Therefore, be it Resolved, That all bids now in the possession of the secretary be re- turned unopened to the several bidders. The resolution was unanimously adopted. THE TEST CASE. At the meeting of the board on October 12, 1891, the secretary made a verbal report, which is summarized in the minutes as follows: Mr. Hayden reported to the board, that after the board had, at Olympia, on the 10th daj r of October, 1891, taken a recess to this meeting to-day, Mr. Arthur and himself had called upon the state treasurer, Hon. A. A. Lindsley, and presented to him warrant No. 65, issued on the fifth day of October, 1891, by the state auditor, in payment for the publication, in the Walla Walla Statesman, of the notice to contractors, inviting proposals for materials and labor necessary in the construction of the main uni- versity building of the University of Washington, for the indorsement thereon by said treasurer of its non-payment for want of funds. The treasurer refused to make such indorsement thereon, alleging, as reason therefor, that, in his judgment, the state auditor had no legal right to issue any warrants upon the university fund; he further stated that he would not, until the supreme court shall have decided that the auditor has a legal right to issue such warrants, make such indorsements upon any more warrants drawn upon the university fund. Mr. Hayden further reported that Mr. Leavenworth, Mr. Arthur and himself had, in the afternoon of October 10, 1891, at Olympia, met the attorney general of the state, proceeded with him to his office, and con- ferred with him upon the various matters set forth in the minutes of the proceedings of this board on the 8th, 9th and 10th of October, 1891, and had advised the attorney general that it would not be necessary for him to attend the meeting of the board in Seattle on October 15, 1891, and had also given him a copy of the resolutions, adopted at the meeting that morning by the board, requesting him to make application to the supreme court for a writ of mandamus directed to the state auditor; and further stated to him the refusal of the state treasurer to indorse non-payment for want of funds upon warrant number 65, and the declaration of the treasurer, that he would not make such indorsement upon any more war- rants drawn by the state auditor upon the university fund, until such I, AND AND BUILDING COMMISSION. 27 time as the supreme court shall have decided that the auditor has a legal right to draw such warrants; and that they suggested to the attorney gen- eral the advisability of applying to the supreme court for a writ of man- damus directed to the state treasurer, requiring him to make such indorse- ments upon the warrants drawn by the state auditor upon said fund, and requesting him to consider whether it would not be better to apply for such mandamus against the treasurer, rather than the auditor. According to the suggestion last referred to, application was made to the supreme court for an alternative writ of mandamus directed to the state treasurer, requiring him to pay the amount of a certain warrant drawn by the state auditor in favor of the Post- Intelligencer Publishing Company, of Seattle; or, if without suffi- cient funds in his hands for such payment, to indorse on the war- rant a statement that it had been presented to him for payment and had not been paid for want of funds; or show cause, etc. The case turned upon section 4 of article 8 of the constitution, which reads: "No moneys shall be paid out of the treasury of this state, or any of its funds, or any of the funds under its management, except in pursuance of an appropriation by law; nor unless such payments be made within two years from the 1st day of May next after the passage of such appro- priation act, and every such law making new appropriation, or continuing or reviving an appropriation, shall distinctly specify the sum appro- priated, and the object to which it is to be applied, and it shall not be sufficient for such law to refer to any other law to tix such sum." The supreme court held this provision to be applicable, and de- cided that no money could be paid out of the treasury under the act, and that the auditor had no right to issue warrants on the uni- versity fund thereunder, for want of specific appropriation. The case is reported in Vol. 3, Washington Reports, pp. 125-130. The opinion of the court concludes as follows: "There being no appropriation upon which the relator's warrant could be drawn, it follows that the alternative writ must be refused. But be- fore concluding this opinion we deem it proper to guard its future con- struction by the statement that it is not our intention to rule by any inference that the auditor might not examine and approve an account against the state (not issuing a warrant therefor) for the expenses of one of its public institutions of necessity or charity, existing under general laws, or of its governmental offices, where no appropriation has been made, or where, by reason of unforseen circumstances, the appropriation made had been exhausted. The alternative writ is denied." Under this strong intimation from the supreme bench, the au- ditor has felt authorized to issue, and has issued, certificates of 28 WASHINGTON STATE CNIVERSITY indebtedness on the accounts approved by the board. These cer- tificates ought to bear interest on the same terras as the auditor's warrants. CONTRACT WITH THE ARCHITECT. The board entered into contract with the architect, William E. Boone, for the preparation of plans and specifications and the su- perintendence of all work of construction, with compensation to him at the rate of live per centum of the cost of the buildings. This is the prevailing rate for such work, as will be seen by the following statement, in the opinion of the supreme court of this state in a case from Seattle, JVbycs v. Pugen, reported in Vol. 27 of the Pacific Reporter, p. 540: "Several architects also testified that the usual price charged by architects for drawing plans and specifi- cations, and superintending the erection of buildings, or, in other words, for full professional services, was five per cent, of the esti- mated cost." The architect entered immediately into correspondence with the principal university officials in America and Europe, with the view to getting their opinions and suggestions in regard to the most ap- proved plans and facilities. He afterwards, at his own expense, visited all the principal colleges and universities in the United States for the same purpose, made careful examination of them, and inquired into their cost. The specifications for the new uni- versity building, prepared by him and adopted by the board, are transmitted herewith in separate pamphlet. Immediately upon the rejection of the bids for the construction of the main building, the architect revised the specifications so as to use native material, wherever it could be substituted for the foreign material provided in the original specifications. He also revised the plans so as to dispense, for the present, with the auditorium. By these changes, a saving of about two hundred thousand dol- lars could be effected. Could the state afford it, the board would prefer to construct upon the original plans and specifications; but, in view of the great ultimate loss which would be entailed by the sale of the old university tract in Seattle at the present time, the board is convinced that it is wise to omit the auditorium and to dispense with foreign materials. When the board was established, the sentiment of the state seemed to be strong and unanimous in favor of erecting first class buildings for the university. Since LAND AND BUILDING COMMISSION. 29 that time the state has experienced a period of financial depression, which must be taken into account in all schemes for carrying on the work immediately. ESTIMATED COST OF STRUCTURES. The architect estimates that by the omission of the auditorium from the main building, and by the modifications of the specifications which have already been mentioned, the main building can be erected for $150,000. He estimates the cost of the dormitories, dining room and kitchen at $200,000; and the cost of the engine house at $15,000. BUILDINGS FIRST NEEDED. We recommend that the time for the completion of the main uni- versity building, ready for occupancy, be fixed at July 1st, 1896. The engine house, dormitories, dining room and kitchen should also be finished at that time. Section 11 of the act gives less than two years for the completion of these buildings. This time is too short. It will take three years to do the work well and assuredly, and have the buildings in proper condition for occupancy. If the work were done by the board, much time could be saved. The publication of notices invit- ing bids, to be followed perhaps, as at the outset, by the rejection of all bids and re-advertisement for more a contingency likely to happen again consumes a great deal of time. Even after the acceptance of bids and the entering into contracts, many weeks must elapse before the actual work of construction is begun. CAUSE OF HIGH BIDS. Section 10 of the act provides that each warrant drawn upon the university fund "shall express upon its face whether the amount therein stated is for material furnished or services rendered, or for labor performed." Under this provision it was necessary to invite bids for the ma- terial separately from bids for labor. Under a single bid for the entire work on the main building, for example, and a contract entered into in accordance therewith, it would be wholly impracti- cable to have each warrant issued to the contractor "express upon its face" whether the amount therein stated is "for material fur- nished" or "for labor performed." This provision is responsible for the unexpected largeness of the 30 WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY bids. It is an anomaly which should be eliminated from the act, or at least made applicable only in the event of the work being done by day's labor under the immediate control and direction of the board and its superintendent of construction. It is not in harmony with the provision of sec. 9 that "the board shall let contract for labor and material necessary for said buildings to the lowest re- sponsible bidder." This latter provision is consistent with the contract system. The provision in sec. 10 is consistent only with the growing theory or popular opinion that all public work should be done by day's labor under the immediate direction of the re- sponsible officers of the government. If the work on the university be done by the board and not under contract, it will be easy to give effect to this provision and to have each warrant show whether it is in payment for material, services or labor. If one contractor shall perform the labor and another furnish the material, it will also, then, be practicable to have each warrant con- form to this requirement of section 10. If, however, one and the same contractor shall be the lowest bidder for both the material and the labor, it would be very difficult, if at all practicable, to comply with this requirement. An examination of the bids made to the board will show the strong repugnance which the bidders had to the practical operation of the provision in section 10, and their virtual refusal to make any bid in conformity to its demand; and it cannot be said that they were captious or unreasonable. Under it the lowest bidder for the furnishing of the materials might not be the lowest bidder for the performance of the labor; and the two contractors bidding the lowest, severally, for these branches of the work might be unable to cooperate honestly, heartily and harmoniously in the construc- tion of the building. They would find themselves compulsory partners in the work. The labor contractor would especially be under manifest disadvantages; he would always be more or less at the mercy of the material contractor. With the prospect of a forced partnership of this kind, no one will willingly or con- fidently undertake either branch of the work at ordinarily low figures. MAP OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY GROUNDS SHOWING THE PRESENT CONDITION AND CONTOUR OK THK TIJACT. LAND AND BUILDING COMMISSION. 33 THE CHIEF ENGINEER'S REPORT. The board employed the chief engineer at the compensation of one hundred and fifty dollars per month and his necessary travel- ing expenses. Although he did not devote his time exclusively to the university, the important services which he rendered were very inadequately paid for at this rate. He has at all times been earnest and zealous in the employ of the board. We give herewith entire his careful and interesting report to the board on the new univer- sity site, the work done, the improvements needed, etc. To the Honorable, the Board of University Land and Building Commis- sioners, Seattle, Washington : GENTLEMEN I have the honor to submit herewith a report of the im- provements made by me under your directions, upon the State Univer- sity grounds in section 16, township 25 north, range 4 east. Very respectfully your obedient servant, FRED G. PLDMMER. TACOMA, Feb. 17, 1892. Chief Engineer. My appointment, made April 15, 1891, went into effect on the the 24th, at which time the board ordered a preliminary survey of the section of land from which the state grant of one hundred and sixty acres was to be selected. With an assistant, I thoroughly scouted the section and recom- mended a preliminary survey, which was immediately made and platted for the information of the board, a papier mache cast was then made, showing the precise contour of the lands, and after a careful consideration the board made a selection in the southern part of the section, which in my first report I spoke of as follows: The selected site lies between Lakes Union and Washington, and has a- frontage of about 1,400 feet on Lake Union and of about 3,800 feet on Lake Washington. A backbone or divide, from 70 to 80 feet high, run& north and south through the middle of the tract, and the land slopes with gentle undulations east and west to the lake front. There is, in all, about twenty acres of good farm land which very materially adds to its value. The Seattle, Lake Shore & Eastern railroad cuts the tract into two unequal portions, which are very unlike in their characteristics. During^ the building of the university the proximity of the railroad is a decided advantage, but upon the completion of the same its location through the tract is not desired. As the railroad claims no definite right-of-way or easements, so far as I can learn, I would suggest that the matter of their rights be carefully examined by competent attorneys, that the rights of the university are not lost. There is, however, sufficient room in the southern portion of the tract entirely free from the railroad which, when improved, will be all that could be desired for such an institution; if the railroad could not be removed from the premises it could be so improved as to be sightly. There are several points on the railroad grade where switches could be put in for the convenience of building material, etc., during the pro- 34 WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY gress of the improvements. The new site is convenient of access from the city and sufficiently elevated to be capable of thorough drainage, possessing many suitable building sites for grouping the various halls and cottages. Its natural approach is from the south, and it is likely that a well graded boulevard will eventually connect the city of Seattle with the grounds; a suitable entrance should, therefore, be provided on the south boundary. As the adjoining property might possibly be used for objectionable purposes, a strip of timber, 200 or 300 feet in width, should be left sur- rounding the boundaries of the tract, not including the lake front. Views of both lakes and mountains can never be cut off by adjoining owners. The soil on the tract is of fair quality, the land mostly a gravelly clay and inclining in some places to a sandy loam. It will no doubt be improved by the ordinary agricultural processes and brought to the best condition for supporting ornamental trees, shrubs and lawns. There is at present a fair growth of usual upland timber of fir, cedar, maple, alder, willow, salal, Oregon grape, brake, etc., in fact, it is a typical Sound upland country. A few small swamps lie in the lower lands and drain into the lakes naturally. There is also found upon the land, in limited quantities, yew, dogwood, wild plum, cherry, thorn, elder, wild rose, and currants and honeysuckle, but they are all of stunted growth and too poor to be \vorth saving. The location of buildings should be with reference to the contour of the land and as to distant views of water and mountain scenery, and the buildings must harmonize with the character of the land upon which they are placed. A tract of natural forest should be left adjoining the science building for zoological and botanical purposes. A gulch should be left in its natural condition for the location of ferneries, etc. The gradual slopes and levels should be grassed, and they will afford the best oppor- tunities for the highest class of landscape gardening. The perspective of the buildings should be taken into careful consideration in reference to the laying out of the land. The botanical and other gardens should be located so as to include the best of the swamp land, together with a vari- ety of natural soils for the propagation of the various flora. The recrea- tion grounds should include baseball grounds, tennis grounds, archery iield, rifle range, musical pavillion, riding paddock, bathing houses, boat house and wharf. The university, complete, will doubtless include twenty or more build- ings, which should be properly grouped so as to be easy of access, well lighted and heated, and at the same time command the best possible posi- tion and view. A complete water system is indispensable for sanitary regulations and fire protection. Supply must be perpetual and the water must be pure and good. The reservoir must be located at a sufficient elevation that a stream can be thrown over the highest building without the aid of other power. The drainage must not be into the same lake from which the water supply is drawn. An artesian well might be successful, but experiments in this country LAND AND BUILDING COMMISSION. 35 have been rare, and I would not advise the expenditure of over one thousand dollars on a trial; I would rather advise the sinking of a good well to a depth of 20 feet below the level of Lake Washington, and I have no doubt that a sufficient supply could be found at that depth; however, should a layer of hard-pan be struck at a short distance below the surface, it might be necessary to tunnel from the lake to the well and then fill up the tunnel with sand and small gravel and other materials, which will aid the filtration of the water. Such a system would un- doubtedly be successful and would not require to be renewed. The buildings should be connected with a brick tunneling for the con- ducting of steam and wires, and at the same time afford a valuable means for ventilation by suction through the stack at the power house. The tire hydrant system with independent pumps for the purpose of keeping individual tanks tilled in the various buildings, should be provided for. I have enumerated these various points for the purpose of showing, that although the main building will be the first, and possibly the only institution of learning to be immediately built, it is necessary and very important that it should be located with reference to all the future im- provements that may be demanded by the growing institution, and while errors in this will always be regretted, they cannot be remedied. The necessary preparation for the grounds includes the clearing and burning of the growth of timber and roots, the saving of the upper soil where the same is to be graded; the draining where necessary, the enriching and deepening of the soil where planting is to be done, and the saving of all materials useful for building or constructing the walks and drives. It will be a matter of economy to immediately improve a small portion of the better land, and plant therein for transplanting the shade trees that will be needed in the near future. A considerable portion of the timber now standing is good for cord wood, and should be saved; there is also considerable good timber and piling upon the tract which should be saved. I would strongly urge the advisability of doing all of this work by days' labor under your immediate direction, as I consider that by this means you can obtain just the kind of work you wish done. I caused warning notices to be posted upon the lands to prevent the removal of timber, gravel, sand and such materials as would be of value in construction. In company with your architect, Mr. William E. Boone, I assisted in locating approximately, the site for the administration building. On August 10th the work of clearing began near the center of the tract, the small trees and undergrowth being first slashed until views of both lakes were obtained, and the main building site was then finally located and the timber clearing began. Only twenty men were employed at first, and the number gradually increased as applications were made by good labor- ers. The general orders for the clearing of the land, were as follows: Work begins 7:30 A. M., ends 12 M. one-half day. Work begins 1 P. M., ends 5 P. M. one-half day. 36 WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY No less than one-half day will be counted. Men over twenty-one years of age, wages $2.25 per day. Men under twenty-one years of age, wages $1.25 per day. Water boys, $4 per week. The best of the small houses on the Lake Union front was immediately made secure as a temporary tool house. All tools and other property were branded or stamped "S. of W." Several test holes were sunk in order to determine the properties of the ground for heavy foundations. The water supply question was thoroughly considered by the board, and in pursuance of instructions, I made a careful study of the subject of artesian supply, and submitted the following regarding the proposition of a permanent well, then entertained by the board: The superior advantages of a successful artesian well for water supply purposes are acknowledged by experts of all countries. There is econ- omy, convenience, unlimited supply and possibly abundance of power. There is no other known system of water supply \vhich can claim so much, excepting, perhaps, where the consumers are in the vicinity of an elevated natural water course. Even then, there are chances of pollution by up-stream residents, freezing in winter and drouth in summer, and as the inhabitants of the world have not yet concluded to quit quarreling, the elements of safety and security in times of invasion or siege, offer good argument for the artesian well. There are over 10,000 flowing wells in the western United States, a large number of which are at high altitude or otherwise apparently un- favorably located. In the Denver basin 250 out of 350 wells are flowing. Out of 1,400 flowing wells sunk in one basin 400 now need pumping the result of partially draining the source of supply by the large number of wells. The Puget Sound basin lies between the Cascades and Coast ranges. It is of secondary formation, rolling and deeply furrowed by water action. It is traversed north and south by an enormous fracture known as Puget Sound, which at points is over 160 fathoms in depth. The mountain streams en route to the Sound have cut deep canons, exposing the formation and assist in locating the line of sandstone cropping. From the general surface topography of the country it is possible to lo- cate a probable line of artesian supply running to the point where the experiment is to be made, and along this line to note the various for- mations. The depth to which the pipe must be sunk is a very uncertain element in its construction, and it is only possible to estimate upon it by sound reasoning. The formation of the basin is favorable to artesian con- ditions, showing successive strata of clay, hardpan, gravel and sand, sometimes with fractures and faults, but generally nearly parallel with the surface. Artesian water would be confined between the impervious strata which form the floor and roof of its natural conduit, and the whole sloping with the inclination of the basin to the point where we propose to tap it. The pressure given at the well, of course, depends upon the MAP OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY (JR(H"XIS SHOWING THE FINAL IMPROVEMENTS CONTEMPLATED KOI; wmcii THE GRADING AND WAS LAND AND BUILDING COMMISSION. 30, elevation of the source and the absence of faults or other leaks in the confining strata. It is probable that the lower sandstone formation will be found at a depth of 1,500 feet at the university grounds, and if this estimate is cor- rect, that will be about the maximum limit of depth. It will be observed that the university lands are located in a smaller basin within the large basin. This smaller basin is very irregular in shape, and accounts for the presence of Samamish lake, Samamish river, Lake Washington, Lake Union, Salmon Bay and Smith's Cove. The elevation of these lakes above the Sound indicates the presence of a supporting impervious stratum, which is consequently impervious to upward pressure as well. There can be ten strata as well as one, and one hundred as well as ten, all overlying the sandstone, and it would seem probable that there would exist at least one artesian lake patiently awaiting its destiny in the boil- ers, laboratories, aquariums and gymnasiums of the future university. It is evident that all strata containing artesian water lying above the greatest depth of Puget Sound, discharge into the Sound. The axis of the small basin above referred to, if projected, would reach a point where the Sound is deepest, and from which it shoals both north and south. This is an illustration of the well known fact that the sub-contours of the Sound are similar in their features to the contours of the adjacent lands, but it is also an indication that we will have to drill 1,000 feet for artesian water unless some favoring fold or fault in the strata were by accident tapped. It also might happen that in one of the upper artesian currents (which discharge into the Sound) there would be sufficient head or pres- ure, at the point tapped, being five miles above its outlet, to force a stream above the surface. In my opinion the chances are great that water will be struck before the 1,500 feet limit is reached, and that the water will be good. The best that could happen would be a supply of water at the surface with a pressure of fifty pounds per square inch, which would give first class building and hydrant service and a balance left for power. I recommend that, as soon as practicable, the construction of a four- inch artesian well be commenced at a point 400 feet to the northwest of the location of the administration building site. Aside from accidents, such a well would cost from $3.50 to $5.00 per foot, according to the materials encountered, and would take a month for ever 500 feet of depth. Specifications accompanied the report, which was illustrated by chart of the region and ideal profiles. On September 16th, I submitted to the board the following: The site selected for the main building by your architect and engineer having been confirmed, I procured from the architect, Mr. Boone, a ground plan and had it staked out upon the ground and found that our conclusions as to the position and datum to be used, were correct. As this structure is the architectural center of the buildings contemplated, the importance of locating it correctly is apparent. It occupies a posi- tion ( as shown on the engraving herewith ) at the north end of a straight line of buildings, and from this point the line of buildings curves to the right ( east) and terminates on a knoll overlooking the waters of Lake 40 WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY Washington. Several preliminary surveys were run over this line, and it has been finally located and staked upon the grounds. I have profiled and cross-sectioned it and found that the best and most suitable grade will have a dip from south to northeast of ten feet in the total length of 2,000 feet. The earth to be moved will be about 54,000 yards and will cost on the average, twenty cents per yard. I am strongly in favor of doing all this grading immediately, for the following reasons: 1. It is the least that can be done to give first-class building sites. 2. Should any further grading be considered advisable, it will be immediately apparent and can be done before the erection of the second building, and without loss of time or money. 3. The main building will occupy such a position that to grade for it would mean to move at least one-half that amount of earth, and at probably seventy per cent, of the cost of the grading of the entire site. 4. During the erection of the main building, it will give increased space for working and greatly facilitate the work. It will be wise, during the progress of the grading, to separate for use in the near future such gravel, sand and surface earth and loam as will be needed for the enriching of the new surface, and the making of proper drives. This matter will be given attention. The area which it is proposed to improve, is about 25 acres. The "bight" of the building line, partially encloses a campus of about 30 acres, on which comparatively little grading is necessary, as gentle slopes nearly conforming with the present contour will give the best effect. The board ordered the work begun immediately, and pushed with all speed to take advantage of the spell of good weather which precedes the rain. So I secured the largest stump puller in the state and the serv- ices of its inventor, and in four days it was in operation and doing good work. The cost was sixty-five dollars per day, and the result about fifty stumps per day. As many as eighty hitches can be made, but rotten stumps break and require second or third hitches. I received offers for teams and scrapers from various contractors, the highest figures being $6 per day, and the lowest $4.25 per day. I gave this work to J. N. Foye & Son Co. at the following figures: For each scraper, with team, harness and teamster $4 25 per day For each plow, with team harness and teamster 5 00 " During all this time a crew of carpenters were busy erecting the tem- porary quarters, consisting of a mess house and kitchen, bunk house, stable, blacksmith shop and powder house. A temporary well was sunk 18 feet and gave a sufficient supply. On October 10th I received instructions from the board by telegraph from Olympia to stop all work. This was only nine days after the or- ganization was complete and the large force of men all working to ad- vantage. The daily report of October 10th was as follows: Number of men chopping 13 Number of men sawing 10 Number of men rolling 23 Number of men grubbing 12 Number of men burning 4 Number of men stumping 9 Number of men blasting 1 Total number clearing 72 LAND AND BUILDING COMMISSION. Number of men plowing ...................................................................................... 3 Number of men scraping .................................................................................... 16 Number of men dressing .................................................................................... 2 Total number grading .............................................................................. 21 Number of foremen ............................................................................................. 7 Number of teamsters .............................................................................................. 7 Number of watchmen ........................................................................................... 1 Number of blacksmiths ........................................................................................ 2 Number of cooks* .................................................................................................. 1 Number of waiters* ................................................................................................ 1 Number of water carriers .................................................................................... 2 Number of carpenters ........................................................................................... 10 Number of officers .................................................................................................. 3 Engineer corps ......................................................................................................... 3 Number of horses .................................................................................................. 45 Number of wagons ...................................... .................... ...................................... 3 Number of wheel scrapers ................................................................................. 9 Number of drag scrapers ..................................................................................... 5 Number of plows ................................................................................................... 2 TOOLS. Number of axes ...................................................................................................... 34 Number of mattocks ............................................................................................. 6 Number of picks .................................................................................................... 11 Number of shovels ................................................................................................. 9 Number of peavies .................................................... ............................................. 28 Number of saws ................................................................................................... 5 Number of brush hooks ........................................................................................ 6 Number of augurs ................................................................................................ 2 Number of sledges .......................................................... ". ...................................... 2 Number of wedges ................................................................................................ 3 Number of scythes ................................................................................................. 1 Number of bellows .............................................................................. ................. 1 Number of spring boards ................................ 2 Number of vices ..................................................................................................... 1 Number of grindstones ....................................................................................... 1 Number of ladders ............................................................................................... 1 * Not paid by the state. [SEAL.] I submit herewith a drawing of the ultimate improvement. It is, of course, understood that the board only contemplates the erection of the main building and dormitories immediately, but it was absolutely neces- sary to have a fixed idea to work to in order that the work now done might conform to the final result as desired. A building located for itself alone, would not be suited to the grand perspective when other improvements followed: The light, heating and water system would also need constant changing or modifying, unless properly laid at the outset to suit the final plans. The administration building occupies the most commanding site, fac- ing the east, with a beautiful view of Lake Washington and the Cascade mountains. In the immediate foreground a campus, nearly level, with a chapel at the south end. The dormitory site is just south of the adminis- tration or main university building, and has a view of both lakes. It 42 WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY overlooks the botanical and experimental gardens which lie south of the botanical hall. To the north of the main building is chemical and physi- cal ball, which is connected by a corridor with the structures comprising the power house, manual training sheds and school of mines. The latin and legal hall is next in line, and is separated from the library and art hall by a small ravine over which the walk crosses upon a bridge. Southeast of the library is the astronomical observatory, located upon a knoll and commanding a view from the transit house due north and south. It is as far as possible from all disturbances. The club and boat house site is on the point north of the observatory, and in front of it is the wharf and boat landing. A drive leads up the hill to the gymnasium in front of which is an eighth mile running track. The hill slopes are graded off in the form of a small fortress for the use of military students, and a low ramp forms a safe wall. North of the railroad is a field for the national game. The county roads are diverted to cross the lands to the rear of the main line of buildings, and are partly hidden by shrubbery and natural woods. The main boulevard enters from the south through an arch and gate, and immediately commands a view of all the buildings in per- spective. It follows the building line as far as legal hall, where a down grade to the wharf begins and the drive passes under the front bridge. Walks connect the buildings and contour the lake front, and a broad, straight promenade leads from the entrance of the administration build- ing across the campus and descends the bench by steps and landing of neat architecture. Other landscape features include natural woods, an aquatic garden with a breakwater in the little bay south of the boat house, and an aqua- rium on the lake front near the southeast corner of the campus. It is very probable that many changes in the details will be made as the improvement progresses, but the contour of the grounds has fixed the general arrangement, and it is doubtful if lands could be found better suited to the purpose. The walks and drives will offer beautiful and ever changing views, and the total result will be as dignified and elegant as the standing and prosperity of the State of Washington demands. EXPENDITURES. Labor $6,855 61 Lumber for temporary buildings 4!)2 27 Hardware, tools and explosives 476 12 Stationery. ... 24 05 $7,848 05 COST IN DETAIL. Clearing $4,078 76 Building trestle, railroad switch 960 00 Stumping 7<)7 25 Grading