i::o)i o I LIBRARY OF THE University of California. Class V Collector Series COINS Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2007 with funding from Microsoft Corporation http://www.archive.org/details/coincollectorOOhazlrich licctor Autographs and\JF^> Manuscripts fc; '^^C English Water- Colours 22 Fine Prints Tapestry Lace and Embroidery THE COIN COLLFXTOR BY W. CAREW HAZLITT SECOND EDITION, REVISED EDINBURGH J O VMS GRANT Miniatures English Book Plates iw Pictures Porcelain Old Bibles Ancient Glass ft . i 'w i n » i 'ii j, i i i mn iw jmnw L~- ■' -.^ ; j CONTENTS NO Introductory .... PACK 7 I. Collectors and Collections . 19 II. Value of Coins 30 III. Unique or Remarkable Coins 38 IV. Greek Coins .... 50 V. Rome ..... 107 VI. Continent of Europe . 121 VII. United Kingdom . 158 VIII. The Coin Market 196 IX. Terminology . 217 X. Bibliography . 286 XI. Description of Plates 295 Index ...... 300 211157 OF THE UNIVERSITY C'i COINS INTRODUCTORY There are many collectors of antiquities, whatever the class may be, who must have felt that they would have been under very considerable obligations, both in re- spect to time and expense, to such a work of reference as might have enabled them to take a general survey of the proposed field of research, and select the ground which it seemed to them best to take up, supposing that it was out of the question to work on more com- prehensive lines. We feel sure that in numerous cases disappointment has been experienced on the too tardy discovery of the unsuspected or imperfectly known magnitude and cost of a collection of old china, old books, old coins, or anything else of the kind, fol- lowed sometimes by a relinquishment of the pursuit, sometimes by an enlargement of the scheme; and, apart from the extent and outlay proving themselves in excess of anticipation, the absence of a tolerably trustworthy guide to the principal points and par- ticulars demanding attention on the side of the buyer and to the dangers, or some of them, which beset the 7 8 THE COLLECTOR SERIES inexperienced amateur, must be regarded as incon- venient and undesirable. For surely it is far better for all concerned to start, if not with eyes quite open, at all events not with eyes quite shut. It is perfectly true, when we narrow the discus- sion to numismatics, that coins are sought by different persons from different motives or aims. The col- lector who chooses to buy specimens regardlessly of condition and value, just for the sake of forming a sort of assemblage of the currencies of older and extinct communities or of the former monetary sys- tems of existing ones, does not perhaps perceive the necessity or utility of counsel. There have been thousands of human creatures who have lived and died under the hallucination that they were the proprietors of important and interesting cabinets of coins, whereas those which were really valuable might have been counted on the fingers. It is so, always has been, and always will be, perchance, with every kind of curiosity and relic, so long as money is to judgment and taste in the ratio of 1000 to 1. We have associated with individuals who had succeeded, much to their appa- rent satisfaction, in amassing archaeological remains of various sorts, and if in their entire length and breadth there was an item or so above mediocrity, the fact was to be ascribed to some fortuitous circumstance, for which the owner was not immediately responsible. There are already two or three works belonging to the category of General Handbooks of Numismatics. Akerman's " Introduction to the Study of Ancient and INTRODUCTORY 9 Modern Coins" and "Numismatic Manual," 1840-48, are alike admirable ; but they represent the knowledge of half-a-century since, and are very weak indeed in the Continental section. "The Coin-Collector's Manual" of Humphreys, originally produced about sixty years ago, continues to reappear with new title- pages, and is not only in many respects obsolete, but mischievously deceptive, inasmuch as its text is the stan- dard of a period before the whole subject was placed on a new footing by modern scholarship and enterprise. It is probably unnecessary to insist on the wide dif- ference between the apparently trivial hobby and the real aims and uses of coin-collecting. It has been an object of interest and curiosity from ancient times, and has been adopted as a pursuit and a research by many of our greatest scholars and public characters in Eng- land of all ranks and professions, from the throne downward. But the manifold and immense value of the study as an aid to history and the progress of commerce and art, no less than to an elucidation of religious sentiment and popular superstition, must be allowed to be a relatively modern development, for which we have to be grateful to the surrender by the earth of its hidden treasures and to the interpreters of the lessons and secrets there discernible. The province of numismatics is so widely spread, that it embraces all periods and countries from the earliest introduction of coined money, and concerns a vast number of historical personages and events. The magnitude of the study is lightened to us by the 10 THE COLLECTOR SERIES sectional labours of a host of able and enthusiastic inquirers, and we are at liberty to select the particular field or line which appears to suit our particular views. But if we cast our eyes around, we soon discover that the range of special pieces extends over the whole area, and that while we possess within the limits of modern Europe, or even of Britain, many remarkable examples, we should form a very imperfect idea of this aspect of the matter if we forbore to comprise the ancient Greek and Roman series and certain salient productions of the East; and it is apt to be a source of agreeable surprise to many who have not devoted much atten- tion to this topic, when they for the first time enjoy an opportunity of examining a veritable coin of the good Caliph Haroun El Reschid, or of that illustrious ruler of Hindostan, so greatly nearer to us, the Emperor Akbar. It is natural enough, of course, that both should have struck money, as they in fact did; but every one does not immediately realise that the Caliph of Bagdad was an actual reality (he was contemporary with Charlemagne), or that the author of the famous " Institutes " was a great practical sove- reign in the same way as Queen Elizabeth was. He was almost exactly parallel with her. Then, again, what collection of this class would be judged complete in the absence of Cleopatra — the Cleopatra — the lady of whom, when we read of her achievements and triumphs and regard her features, we are nearly betrayed into suggesting that it must have been in her manner that much of the charm lav. INTRODUCTORY 11 The numismatic products of every part of Europe exhibit their own peculiar features of interest and claims to attention ; but a careful and leisurely colla- tion of one with another shows us more and more how much in this respect the moderns owe to the ancients, or how little the world has acquired in its riper life which it had not learned and forgotten in its youth. In the sort of coup-d'ceil which our volume affords, that great lesson is readable in many and many a place. One of the earliest collectors of coins in England is said to have been Prince Henry, son of James I. But the pursuit is undoubtedly of great antiquity, and the Romans are credited with having sought the money of those nations which preceded them, and notably the Greeks, in power and in the arts. There was a very prolonged interval, during the whole of the mediae- val period and later, when the ancient coinages were neglected and destroyed ; and even when the taste for memorials of the past revived, it was at first the medal rather than the current money which attracted atten- tion — the medal in the wider sense in which it still finds acceptance in many languages and systems. The modern Europeans made amends for their barbarous predecessors by engaging from the seventeenth century onward with unbroken continuity in the collection and study of these inestimable treasures ; and we know how busy the pickaxe and the spade have been in reclaiming from the earth in all parts of the world trodden by the ancients the buried heirlooms of centuries — numismatic archives, which have in some instances made the writing 12 THE COLLECTOR SERIES of history possible, and in others its rewriting necessary. These eloquent though inarticulate expounders of the transactions of mankind in remote ages have created, nearly within living memory, a new era in almost every department of human science, and have reduced our older books of reference and our former speculations alike to waste paper. The prosaic and utilitarian spirit of our modern money forbids us to believe that in the time to come men will turn to it for instruction from any point of view, save perhaps its betrayal of incipient national decline. Fortunately for those who follow numismatics as a calling, the inducements to collect are manifold indeed. There may be said to be no piece so destitute of com- mercial value, so insignificant in aspect, so artistically and historically trivial, which does not meet with a home, if not with an admirer. Poor specimens are fre- quently of the greatest use to the student in settling a moot point of detail. You cannot, as with a book, make a good coin out of two bad ones ; but you can com- plete a legend or a type ; and instances are on record where it has asked half-a-dozen more or less imperfect pieces to supply the whole reading and story. To specialists, whose treatment is naturally sectional and exhaustive, the compiler of a volume which may not be entitled to aspire to a higher rank than that of a general numismatic chart must not calculate upon being very serviceable. Yet, although a collector on this narrow gauge may, and usually does, know what he is doing, to him it is apt to be acceptable for the INTRODUCTORY 13 sake of collateral illustration and comparative study, since regions geographically far distant from each other are often found to present striking points of agreement in their monetary laws and patterns from a variety of agencies ; and many, again, like to have the means ready to hand of ascertaining what is outside as well as within their own frontiers. It may not be superfluous to reiterate the observa- tion, trite as it may be, that in the present class of monument — nay, in it alone not seldom — we seek and find many of the most precious truths pertaining to the history and fortunes of the human race in all parts of the globe from the sixth century before the Christian era. The magnificent Greek series, so ably edited by Dr Head, is itself of incalculable value, not only in illustrating customs, arts, and opinions, but in deter- mining the names and situations of places no longer known, and the titles and chronology of dynasts of whom we meet with no other trace. The Roman coinage, inferior in execution, variety, and antiquity, remains an imperishable and unique record of that ex- traordinary people in their rise, greatness, and decline, and reflects all the stages of national progress and decay during eight centuries of fluctuating political life and activity. The currencies of the European Continent, and in- deed that of England, take up the thread where the Romans, as it were, let it fall ; and setting aside the money struck since the close of the old rtgime in 1789, we find ourselves the inheritors of a stupendous accu- 14 THE COLLECTOR SERIES mulation of coins in all metals, of all countries, of all periods, which the incessant and combined labours of numismatic experts have, more particularly within the last half -century, reduced to some degree of order and sequence by the means of monographs and local studies, without arriving at a solution of many moot problems, much less at the end of the task. MM. Rollin and Feuardent of Paris keep a number of early coins pending the means of attribution. The modern European coinage has perhaps enjoyed at the hands of those most competent to deal with it far less attention than it merits. Many localities are still without any systematic account of their currencies, which has to be obtained by casual or indirect means ; and even such as have secured specialists to describe them, cannot be said, as a rule, to possess more than dry academic lists or calendars, destitute of allusion to the human interest resident in so large a proportion of these remains. In the treatment of the coinage of the United King- dom from British times, condensation and succinctness have of course been imperative, while the larger books on this branch of the theme, in regard at least to the more modern coins, are perhaps too copious and minute. The Anglo-Gallic series has been classed with the French, which it chiefly follows in its models and denominations. It is trusted and thought that no essential facts have been overlooked. It is only necessary to make a survey of the extent of the field covered by a manual like that now offered INTRODUCTORY 15 to the coin -collector, and of the bulky and even volumi- nous publications which scholars have dedicated to accounts of the numismatic histories of individual countries and towns, to become aware of the difficulty of treating the subject in an intelligible and satisfac- tory manner on so contracted a scale as that to which it is here compulsorily reduced. On the other hand, there is at present no single book of reference where students and amateurs can, as a starting-point, gain a general idea and estimate of the proportions and limits of their plan for forming a cabinet either on a compre- hensive or on a restricted basis. The grand divisions of the volume are : — 1. Greek ; 2. Roman ; 3. Conti- nental; 4. British, or money of the United Kingdom and the Colonies in its successive stages of development. There are collectors who make their choice and stand by it ; others who collect different series at different times ; others whose scheme is miscellaneous or desultory. To all these classes increased facility for judging within a convenient compass what constitutes a series, its chro- nology, its features, its difficulties, ought to be accept- able. To master even the prominent monographs is a task which is sufficient to deter all but the most earnest and indefatigable enthusiasts; and as usual, no doubt, collections are made on a principle more or less loose and vague. At any rate, the first step should be, we apprehend, to reconnoitre the ground, and mea- sure the space to be traversed, with the approximate cost. In the production of a monograph, it may be said 16 THE COLLECTOR SERIES that there is no detail which is too minute for notice, and no point so trivial but that it deserves admission in its proper place as an incidental or collateral illus- tration. But, again, the monograph may be of more than one kind — a treatise devoted to the records of a country or of a city, or of a particular epoch or reign, or, finally, of the coins of a given type associated with a locality or with a group of localities. Dr Head describes his very scholarly, admirable, and interesting Historia Numorum, 1887, as a "Manual of Greek Numismatics"; it is a royal 8vo of over 800 pages. Stevenson's " Dictionary of Roman Coins," 1889, runs to 928 pages. The present writer's "Coinage of Europe," 1893, makes 554 pages, and the Supplement, 1897, 193 pages. If we turn to undertakings limited to a city, we find the bulk augmenting in proportion to the narrowness of the scope ; and this class of numismatic work is of the highest value when it has had the advantage of local information and experience. The process, by which accounts of well-nigh every place in the world known at any time to have been the source of a coinage, great or small, permanent or temporary, have been printed by specialists, has been carried on within the last half century so assiduously, that a complete corpus of numismatic literature, including certain recognised catalogues, such as the D'Amecourt, Reimmann, Rossi, Robert, Montenuovo, Meyer, Ligny is a library in itself, and a large one. To compile a sort of Index Raisonne" to such a body of material, with select illustrations, has been, then, the INTRODUCTORY 17 object of the writer; he has mapped out in outline the entire field of numismatic activity in ancient and modern Europe, and has reserved to those who consult his pages the option of inquiring further, and of regu- lating their course by the general indications here sup- plied. In the space allotted to him, to accomplish more than this was impossible. It is obvious enough that the multiplicity of books and pamphlets on coins equally attests the vivid and lasting interest in the subject, and the slowly cumu- lative method whereby we have enriched our stores and our knowledge in this direction. Some of the most momentous additions to our means of properly under- standing the ancient and mediaeval series have accrued in the most fortuitous manner ; one discovery has often led the way to others, till a chain of evidence has been gradually completed, and what appeared at first sight to be a stray and unconnected item has proved to be a member of a consecutive series ; and incalculable service has been rendered to the cause by the host of honorary workers who have identified themselves with a small branch of the inquiry, or even with an isolated group of numismatic remains. We may mention, for ex- ample, the obligations under which we lie for the Bactrian coins to the late General Cunningham; for those of Cyzicus to Canon Greenwell ; for the coins of Metz and Lorraine to M. Kobert ; for those of Venice to Schweitzer and Count Papadopoli; for the Sieben- btirgen series to the Count of Montenuovo; and for innumerable revisions and additions in every depart- B 18 THE COLLECTOR SERIES ment to the Numismatic Societies' Transactions of England, France, Germany, Belgium, and Switzerland. The works of Hoffmann and Poey D'Avant are of im- mense importance for the royal and feudal money of France. The collections of the Cavaliere Rossi and of the Reimmann, Meyer, and Gnecchi families were indirectly instrumental in enlarging our acquaintance with the earlier coinages of Italy and Germany. Some incidental notices will occur respecting Oriental coins. This is almost a class apart, and from the difficulties offered by the legends it is one sought only in specimens by ordinary European collectors. The majority of the more modern productions of this char- acter are obtainable at rates very slightly in advance of the metallic values. The late keeper of the Medal and Coin Department of the British Museum possessed a special knowledge of the Oriental side of numismatics, and we are indebted to his scholarship for the ably edited volumes on the subject published under the direction of the Trustees, and to which the reader cannot do better than refer. COLLECTOKS AND COLLECTIONS The formation of Collections of Coins originated, not in the Numismatist, but in the Hoarder. Individuals, from an early stage in the history of coined money, laid pieces aside, as (nearer to our day) Samuel Pepys did, because they were striking or novel, or secreted them in the ground, like Pepys, because they were thought to be insecure. The former habit may be considered the germ of the coin-cabinet, as we know it ; the latter accounts for those Finds which in modern times have enriched and advanced numismatic science to so pro- digious and unlooked-for an extent ; and in some cases the result of casual excavation seems to point to a habit, in primitive times, among certain classes, of hold- ing large sums in specie, which the prospect of danger led the owner to bury, as we appear to see in the Chancton find of 1866. The French term medaille, as commonly applied either to a medal or a coin, is a key to the inducement, in the first instance, to treat this class of monuments as objects of study. During a prolonged period, when coins had fairly begun to attract attention beyond their 19 20 THE COLLECTOR SERIES commercial and current aspects, it was their historical and biographical interest which awakened and stimu- lated curiosity. It was as records of public occurrences and as portraitures of celebrated men and women that, first of all, the Greeks, then the Romans, and finally the modern Europeans, sought and cherished them; and collections of medals proper and monetary medal- lions remained accordingly the principal, even when they had ceased to be the exclusive, aim of connoisseurs. In Great Britain the two systems have been usually kept apart; but in the continental coinages, down to a quite recent period, the ancient theory and feeling have survived. There is no probability that the practice of accumu- lating extensive and scientifically ordered assemblages of coins was one favoured by our remote predecessors beyond the necessity, prior to the institution of banks, for storing specie in private houses ; yet this very need may have led to the study of types by inquiring eyes, while, in the interval between an archaic law of exchange or of calculation by weight, a considerable proportion of the personality had its appointed place of custody on the premises of merchants and others. Traders and travellers were just the two elements in early human societies which were most apt, from the exceptional facilities afforded to them, to look more or less critically at currencies, and to institute comparisons between one and another, if they were not sometimes instrumental in suggesting to those in authority changes and improve- ments. COLLECTORS AND COLLECTIONS 21 The first distinct intimation, however, of a cabinet of medallic character, that is to say, of medals and coins selected on account of their illustrative and artistic value, is associated with a relatively modern epoch and with an English prince. Books, manuscripts, paint- ing, statuary, ceramics, bronzes, even gems, had found admirers long before Prince Henry, eldest son of James I., directed his attention to numismatics in con- junction with his pursuits as a book -lover. At his death in 1612 his medals and coins were valued at something like £3000 ; it must have been a large and important body of examples, if we take into account the difference in the monetary standard. The most remarkable point seems to be, that the taste developed itself thus strongly and abruptly in the Stuarts, a Scotish house influenced by French culture, if not by Spanish magnificence and fondness for display. The great Pembroke collection, of which we fortu- nately possess a catalogue, belongs to the two succeed- ing centuries, and was probably formed during the reigns of Charles II., James II., William III., Anne, and George I., by Thomas Herbert, Earl of Pembroke and Montgomery (1685-1733), an enthusiastic antiquary; it is especially noticeable, inasmuch as it for the first time recognises the English and Scotish series side by side with the Greek and Roman ; they constitute Part IV. of the posthumous Catalogue, 1746. The whole has been dispersed ; and the prices realised by the fourth portion were very high, as it comprised numerous rari- ties acquired by the original noble owner, not for that 22 THE COLLECTOR SERIES reason, but for a far better one — their archaeological interest. It was doubtless the precedent set by such persons as Lord Pembroke, who has had occasional successors, such as Lord Ashburnham, Lord Hastings, and Lord Grantley, which encouraged the pursuit on the part of others, with whom it might become an object of ambition to emulate the titled aristocracy and qualify themselves to occupy a footing based on confrdrie ; and the cause of knowledge and the interests of science naturally profited by a generous competition, in which at last all classes found themselves joining. In the course of the eighteenth century, and still more, owing to political developments, of that of which we are per- sonal witnesses, scarcely a vocation exists which has not, or has not formerly had, its representatives on the now long roll of coin-collectors. Every profession and industry have contributed their quota: the Church, the Law, the Army, the Navy, Medicine, the Stock Exchange, Commerce; and the taste, though more usually personal, is occasionally hereditary. The older race of collectors, even in the century just behind us, leaned on the whole more toward the medal than the coin, and at any rate displayed an almost exclusive partiality for the Greek and Roman series, just as the bibliophile of the same period cultivated the Greek and Roman writers at the expense of the early English and continental literature. A survey of the catalogues of the average coin-collectors of a few gene- rations since will show how prevalent was this bias, and COLLECTORS AND COLLECTIONS 23 in how slight esteem the monetary productions and antiquities of England and Scotland were formerly held in comparison with those belonging to classical times. The Earl of Pembroke seems to have almost taken the lead in admitting the ancient money of his own country to a share of attention and space, and his descendant, who sold his numismatic treasures, profited by the favourable change which had meanwhile occurred in the market value; and we must not forget that Hunter, the famous surgeon, also established an early sympathy with the modern and English side, as we see from his noble bequest to Glasgow, of which the ancient Greek section is in course of publication. It was from the end of the first quarter of last century, when Mr Sotheby sold the cabinet of Sir Mark Sykes, that the more modern lines of collecting may be said to have com- menced. Marmaduke Trattle's extensive and splendid assemblage of English coins, however, was the earliest, perhaps, of first-class importance sold by the same firm, while in a pecuniary respect it proved, from the sum realised, one of the most remunerative and encouraging. This happened in the thirties ; and the sixty or seventy years which separate us from that notable event have been witnesses to an instructive succession of similar episodes in the numismatic world, indicating the inevi- table fluctuations in tastes and prices, but with a steady tendency, on the whole, to the acceptance of Condition as a postulate and an influence, and the surrender of inferior specimens to the student on the one hand or the crucible on the other. 24 THE COLLECTOR SERIES A complete list of all the coin-sales which have taken place during the past fifty years in Great Britain, and on the continent would fill a larger volume than the present, and would scarcely exclude any rank or vocation in life within a liberal sphere. But, limiting ourselves to the more remarkable incidents of this class, we have to cite the Addington, Ashburnham, Bieber, Bryce, Christmas, Cuff, Cunningham, Drum- mond, Duncombe, Durrant, Dymock, Forster, Mar- sham, Yorke Moore, Murchison, Rostron, Shepherd, and Thomas cabinets; and for Scotland, those of Coats, Lindsay, Martin, and Wingate, of which the first is still intact in the hands of a son. Of all these, the Thomas sale, the fruit of half a century's devotion to the pursuit, was the most comprehen- sive, embracing coins and medals of all countries and periods; while that of Mr Coats may claim to be most complete in the Scotish series. Among the minor gatherings may be grouped the numerous in- stances where casual acquisitions by a family during generations in the course of travels abroad have insensibly grown into a hoard, and have included, as was the case (1890) with the Beaufort coins, a few pieces of considerable value. When we pass from collectors, whose possessions have changed hands, and sometimes have found per- manent homes in public institutions, our thoughts and eyes naturally turn to such as are yet in the midst of us : Sir John Evans, Canon Greenwell, Dr Hermann Weber, Lord Grantley, Mr Richardson, and others ; to whom it PLATE 1. COLLECTORS AND COLLECTIONS 25 is hardly improper to add the names of the late Hyman Montagu and the late Mr Murdoch, owners of the largest, richest, and most varied assemblages of numis- matic monuments since the historical Thomas sale. Of the magnitude and splendour of the Montagu cabinet some idea may be formed when we mention that it contained 1300 Roman aurei, and in the medallic department 150 pieces wanting in Great Russell Street, besides an Anglo-Saxon series of extraordinary extent. The Murdoch sale was more recent, and occupied about 40 days. As regards the Sources of Supply, an intending collector (although at first collectors are often uncon- scious of being such) has to rely in the main on the auction and the dealer, the former being a medium of acquisition attended by many drawbacks and dangers, inasmuch as the coins in a sale under the hammer are seldom lotted in a way to suit private buyers, and as the trade not unnaturally resents that class of com- petition. It very greatly depends on the line chosen, with what firms one should have relations ; but all the leading European centres have their numismatic emporia, and even in minor towns desirable coins are frequently offered for sale. Just at the commencement any one may provide himself very well in London; later on, according to the extent of his plan, he may find it possible and convenient to correspond with Paris, Madrid, Berlin, Vienna, Dresden, Leipsic, Frankfort-on- Main, Munich, Amsterdam, and other headquarters of experts and specialists. The sooner, in case he pro- 26 THE COLLECTOR SERIES poses to work on more or less ambitious lines, he acquires knowledge and judgment, the less likely it will be that he will grow dissatisfied with his hobby and out of humour with those who have contributed to indulge it. A new aspirant to numismatic honours cannot do better when he has passed the "penny-box" stage, unless he leaps at one bound into the saddle, having started at a maturer period of life, and with experience gained from others — he cannot do better than study attentively the best authorities. These are — (1) numis- matic books of the latest date, whether monographs or general treatises ; (2) sale catalogues, with the prices. Personal experience has satisfied the writer that com- mercially, as well as numismatically, a thorough ac- quaintance with the best catalogues is of the utmost value; and, besides those of the collections already named, the hunter for continental coins must bring himself into touch with the principal works of reference ready to his hand, as it were, in the shape of descriptive accounts of those magnificent cabinets which have been formed and dispersed in various parts of Europe. We may particularise the names of the Prince de Ligny, Meyer, Montenuovo, Reimmann, Robert, Rossi, Boyne, Gnecchi, as affording through their respective cata- logues the most precious insight into the material which exists, and the probable and best means of accomplishing a new numismatic project. Monographs have, of course, their clear use ; but for general purposes they are apt to be too minute and COLLECTORS AND COLLECTIONS 27 elaborate, and they are calculated, perhaps, for the literary inquirer rather than for the amateur. At the same time, every one ought to be aware that of recent years a very large and important body of works has accumulated, dealing with the monetary annals of the smaller foreign States, on a scale which would be impossible on any other principle; and, on the other hand, those who desire to become conversant with the development and processes of coinage at different epochs and in different countries will find it necessary to resort to such books as Ruding's "Annals," of which there are analogues in every European literature and language. A general notion of the subject is to be derived from the introduction to Mr Eobertson's "Handbook to the Coinage of Scotland," 1878. But the Coats Catalogue is the most complete work of reference. Finds of coins do not usually prove of signal service to ordinary purchasers, as they are too often composed of specimens of the same piece indefinitely repeated, and as a rule occur under conditions which place them beyond the reach of the public, or at least of private individuals. As additions to our knowledge of types and mints, if not of actual products, these periodical events have constantly augmented our numismatic stores and information, verifying entries in ancient records, filling up gaps in series, supplying hitherto unreadable legends, and helping us in many other ways. The circumstances under which trouvailles have taken place are literally endless. A small hoard of English and 28 THE COLLECTOR SERIES foreign gold coins was discovered in 1895 at West- minster, encased in a sheet of lead. The unique half George Noble of Henry VIII. in the Montagu collec- tion was bought by Mr Curt in Paris for a moderate sum, sold to the Rev. Mr Shepherd for £90, and at his sale in 1885 realised £255. We must resist the temptation to dwell on this part of the topic. To return for a moment to the questions of condition and difference of taste, it is not to be denied that some of the most precious fruits of numismatics have been gathered and applied by persons who, like the late Mr Babington, almost ostentatiously disregarded the state of the pieces under examination; and again, there is no doubt that real and cultivated interest in the pursuit has been first awakened by the accidental or desultory acquisition in early life of a handful of old coins selected from the familiar penny-box. The dis- advantage which a practical and exact student incurs by the employment of defective examples lies in the inability to decipher the whole of the type; and this becomes tantalising when the object of attention is a supposed inedited variety. An entertaining paper might doubtless be written on the eccentricities of the less experienced in the present branch of inquiry or recreation. Many numismatists, who lived to outgrow the crude conceptions of their novitiate, might, had they been of an autobiographical turn of mind, have let us into some curious secrets, some affecting only themselves, others where third parties were concerned. Few collectors, it is probable, COLLECTORS AND COLLECTIONS 29 have escaped without making mistakes, and without falling into the toils of the wily expert, while they graduate; and it goes without saying that the majo- rity, as they seldom prosecute the undertaking to the end, seldom also attain sufficient discernment and mas- tery to enable them to achieve a satisfactory result. Instances are on record where simple gentlemen have, Procrustes-like, clipped their coins to fit the piercings in their cabinets ; where an entire collection of Roman brass was submitted to treatment with brick-dust ; and where, once more, an owner, solicitous of patinated specimens, has improved upon the too leisurely pro- cesses of nature by enlisting the services of art, and superimposing a nice coat of green paint, or dipping the pieces in oil to lend them a lustre ! These are inepti- tudes ; and so far as the more respectable numismatic houses in London and elsewhere are concerned, the clients whom they prefer are such as understand what they want and seek, and are prepared to pay for the proper article a reasonable price. II VALUE OF COINS The estimation of ancient coins of different countries and periods depends on such a variety of considerations and circumstances that it is almost impossible and useless to attempt to form, for the instruction of the younger school of collectors, a scale or standard for judging either the merits or commercial worth of any class of currency. The interest with which this pursuit inspires those engaged in it is singularly diversified. Some are governed by topographical, some by chrono- logical, and others by internal lines and limits; and the prevailing motive has, of course, a tendency to render others of secondary weight and influence. One man collects the coins of a particular country or epoch, and does not study their preservation; another looks exclusively to the state of his acquisitions, and disre- gards the places of origin, treating each item on its own individual merits as a curiosity or work of art. The choice of metals is a further contribution to the wide diversity of taste and fashion in these matters; there are collectors of gold only, of silver only, and of copper only. Then there are such as will buy a small coin and will not entertain the notion of a larger one, VALUE OF COINS 31 and vice versd. It must be evident that the co-existence of so many numismatic faiths or tenets unavoidably operates on the market, and sways it in different direc- tions from time to time. A call for a given series, type, country, on the part of a small knot of amateurs suffices to innate for the moment the quotations. These vicissitudes and fluctuations are incessant ; and to them have to be added the surprises and perils which equally beset the buyer and seller in the shape of periodical finds of rare coins, with the result that the balance is at once disturbed, and prior investments depreciated for a longer or shorter period, according to the circum- stances. The serious and sometimes puzzling fluctua- tions in the prices of coins are susceptible of the general explanation that the market is governed for the time being by a very small body of collectors, often buyers on the same lines. We see that it is now the Greek series, now the Eoman, now the English, which is in the ascendant. An influential amateur is in the field for one or the other, and he gains followers ; and the set makes a new tariff, which lasts till they are tired of their amusement, or have no further desiderata. In many of these cases prices current are adapted to the circumstances ; there is an artificial inflation ; the climax is reached at last, and the bubble bursts. The loss is to the last holders at high quotations. The foregoing criticism applies only to hobby-riders, not to the man who has a genuine feeling for the pursuit, and acquires coins, not because they are dear or cheap, but because he likes them. The Carfrae and Ashburnham sales 32 THE COLLECTOR SERIES have recently reawakened the interest in Greek coins, and the Richardson cabinet of English ones went a little tamely ; this was partly because several collectors of such things are dead or have withdrawn, and partly because the sale was merely a portion of the property, and that of a living person. The vast and varied numismatic treasures of the continent of Europe are still, in the main, a terra incognita to English and American collectors. Some say they may have their turn, and they will be found almost incapable of exhaustion. The formation of priced lists of coins in Numismatic Manuals is, on the grounds above stated, shown there- fore to be at best of very slight utility, and more often a source of error and trouble. It may gratify a possessor to read in a book or in a newspaper that some specimen which he acquired for a very moderate sum has realised a much larger one; but the price is a feature which is well known to rely on — (1) the condi- tion; (2) the type; (3) the prior owner. Which of these factors is the most influential, it might be pre- sumptuous to attempt to decide. Even condition is a relative term. The auctioneer tells you that a piece is "fine for the coin" ; and this is apt to be most true when a coin has been struck on impure material by an unskilful moneyer, or when, as in so many of the colo- nial coins of all countries, siege-pieces, or currency of troubled and insecure reigns, the flan is too small for the die. At any rate, condition has of late com- manded more general respect in England, France, and THE VALUE OF COINS 33 the United States ; and when one reflects that a private cabinet can be little more than a selection of specimens, it would appear to be very possible to reject examples which are undesirable on this account, if the object is simply to bring together a representative assemblage of productions agreeable to the eye and the taste. Taking the type as a leading inducement, there are all the gradations from an absolutely different die to infinitesimal minutice of detail in one or another respect, constituting a variety. The prior ownership or provenance is a third agency, which impairs the trust- worthiness of prices, and necessitates caution in forming estimates from coins surrounded by a sort of atmospheric nimbus of the value of normal specimens. It is, to some extent, with coins as it is with books. The safest branch of early numismatics of every part of the world to cultivate in a practical sense as a col- lector is probably the copper and billon money; for, as the preservation becomes more generally a question in the choice of coins, it will be more and more apparent that productions in these two metals are the most difficult to procure in fine state, and if they occur in trouvailles, are almost always irre- mediably damaged by corrosion. On the contrary, through the extension of railway enterprise and other causes, early money in the more precious metals may be expected to arise as the fruit of excava- tions, as it has already done in Affghanistan, Asia Minor, Greece, Turkey, Italy, France, England, and other parts of Europe and Asia, revolutionising prices 34 THE COLLECTOR SERIES as well as knowledge. The British Museum Annual Reports of acquisitions during the twelvemonth will give a good idea of the temerity of presuming either finality of information or uniqueness of examples. Altogether, in the absence of a special line of study, where the outlay by right should not be excessive, the soundest counsel to tender to a new enterer on the numismatic field seems to be to obey two cardinal prin- ciples : (1) to buy the best quality ; (2) to refrain from over-buying. The real art in these cases (it is equally so in other departments) is to hold one's hand ; it is always easy enough to acquire to satiety ; and it is not a whit more difficult to realise at a heavy sacrifice. The completion of a scheme of this kind usually extends over years ; it is wise not to be in a hurry ; profit by accidental opportunities and intervals of depression ; and rejoice if, in the long-run, the harvest is not too ample. If the hammer can scatter in not more than three days the work of a lifetime, it is well ; and if the standard is high and uniform, and the owner has shed an odour on his property, there is no reason for fear. It is the man who buys too much and not too well for whom his friends ought to offer up their prayers. It is highly necessary that the English or English-speaking collector of foreign coins should protect himself against two classes of danger: — the want of conversance of English dealers, on the one hand, with the market value of a large proportion of the items belonging to the series, from the infrequency of their occurrence among us ; and, on the other, the not unknown habit of the VALUE OF COINS 35 continental houses of marking their property for an English or American meridian. But personal experi- ence and judgment are the best safeguards in respect alike to this branch of the pursuit and to others, as the Greek, Koman, and British, where examples, especially those of higher value, rest on their individual merits, and dearness or the reverse are merely relative terms. Another very essential point to be held in view is, that it is a real disadvantage to a private cabinet to be too complete, as in sales abundance cloys; and it is always better to wait opportunities of securing deside- rata at reasonable prices than to jump at the first offer. The permanent and exclusive loyalty, not to a class or country, which may be very well, but to a more or less obscure series, is very apt to prove dangerous, inas- much as there is the inherent accumulation of a body of virtual duplicates even where scarcely two articles are absolutely the same. In the foregoing remarks there has been a primd facie presumption that the dedication of an appreciable amount of property to this purpose has not taken place without some ulterior regard to reimbursement, since, even where one does not engage in a pursuit with an eye to profit, one may very possibly and very reasonably do so with the expectation that a fair proportion, if not the whole, of the outlay will return. This can only be the experience when judgment and taste are combined. With coins it is as with books and every other species 36 THE COLLECTOR SERIES of similar property. The quotation of auction prices can by no means be affirmed to be without its degree of utility ; but it is a class of information which, in the hands of a tyro (they are not invariably young), is exceedingly apt to be fallacious and misleading. A dealer asks over £12 for a tetradrachm of Perseus of Macedon; you judge it to be dear; he shows you another, which will cost you a guinea. It is the same coin — with a difference. In the same manner M. Fon- taine, the great Paris bookseller, lays down side by side two copies of an edition of a certain old book ; one is to be bought for 100 francs, the other for 5000. Then, at a sale, the biddings are regulated not merely by the items themselves, but by the atmosphere ; not by the state of business in the city, but by the presence in the market of two, or say three, buyers whose cabinets lack certain rarities, or perhaps by a competition between a private individual and the British Museum ; or it may happen (who knows?) that the commissions for the highest figures have crossed over from the Continent ; that MM. Rollin and Feuardent of Paris, M. Serrure, or some other continental firm, have instructions to secure this or that against all comers. That is the sort of agency which is behind prices and the fluctuations in prices; and for the bulk of a collection under the hammer there is no question that the character of the owner is a most potential influence. It is almost less what you have to sell than who you are that are selling ; and it is immense odds in your favour if you are a dead hero. Fortune smiles upon the posthumous. The VALUE OF COINS 37 auctioneer and the company, if they are not unanimous on any other point, agree in loving a departed celebrity ; for if there were one or two tiresome traits in his gene- rally faultless character, these are things of the past ; he can play no more tricks. Although the question of prices may be a moot one, and the uncertainty attending the product of any given coin under the hammer is, from an infinite variety of causes, as great as it is inexplicable, it has been thought best, on the whole, to attempt to meet the case to a certain extent, and in a section which we call The Coin Market, we have essayed to reduce to an intelligible form some statistics bearing on this topic, with a few particulars, which may be of interest and use, of a cognate character. Ill UNIQUE OK KEMAEKABLE COINS It may be requisite to offer a few observations on a species of money, of which examples are found in almost every important European currency, both ancient and modern, and which owe their interest and value to the peculiar type or denomination, to the person by whom they were struck, or to the circumstances attending their appearance. In such works as Dr Head's Historia Numorurriy Stevenson's " Dictionary of Roman Coins," Akerman's various publications, the Numismatic Chronicle, and similar periodicals printed abroad, and the present writer's "Coinage of the European Con- tinent," 1893-97, mention frequently occurs of coins which have descended to us in presumedly unique specimens, or are represented by two or three deposited in public collections. Nevertheless it cannot fail to be of some service to draw up a notice of the leading monuments of this rather tantalising class belonging to the respective divisions of our subject, more especially as, by directing attention to them, duplicates or addi- tional examples may be discovered or identified. It is not to be supposed that uniqueness or singu- larity of character necessarily involve intrinsic merits 38 UNIQUE OR REMARKABLE COINS 39 and attractions, beyond the fact that these qualities often render rarity and beauty, or excellence, con- vertible terms. The most splendid examples of Greek workmanship and art may be seen, for instance, on a bronze coin obtainable for a few shillings in the highest state of preservation; and, again, they occur on the Syracusan dekadrachms or medallions, which are cer- tainly costly, but are not very uncommon. In the Greek Series, the pieces falling within the present category, if they were exhaustively enumerated, would prove a considerable body, distributed over the large numismatic area to which ancient Hellas extended. But we are dealing only with such extreme specialities as may appear to deserve an independent section. For instance, it will be perceived from a perusal of the Historia Numorum that in the archaic electrum coinage, so widely prevalent at one period, many unique examples are preserved in the English or French national collec- tions, and that there were special issues of money, like that of the exiled Themistocles at Magnesia, of which not above two or three specimens have descended to us. Again, the Macedonian dekadrachm is as rare as most of the coinage of that power after the period of Alex- ander I., and the Archaic era is the reverse ; and the coins of Bactria, once almost unknown, and very imper- fectly so when Wilson published his Ariana Antiqua in 1841, are at present abundant, with certain excep- tions — those exceptions of a somewhat momentous kind. For we have, appertaining to this rather fascinating succession of currency, illustrations of both 40 THE COLLECTOR SERIES the points before us. A 20-stater piece in gold of Eukratides, King of Bactria, and a silver dekadrachm, unassigned, exist, so far as has been ascertained, in soli- tary specimens in the Bibliotheque at Paris and in the British Museum respectively ; a silver tetradrachm of Plato, King of Bactria, is unknown outside the latter repository; and our national collection also possesses three examples of the highly interesting coinage (tetradr. and dr.), with the portrait of Eukratides on one side, and those of Heliocles and Laodice on the other. The true history of the Bactrian money is still involved in great obscurity ; we have little more than internal evidence to guide us ; but, except of Diodotus, the earliest autonomous ruler, and of Eukratides, we seem to have no gold. The 20-stater above mentioned was obtained in the Punjaub, sold to Rollin & Feuardent of Paris for £800, and by them, under the express autho- rity of the Emperor, who paid half, transferred to the Bibliotheque for £1200. This was in 1867. The Museum dekadrachm presented by Sir Wollaston Franks in 1887, is not well preserved. The British Museum greatly increased its store in this direction by the purchase of the collection of General Cunningham. The gold of Athens is particularly rare, and that of Syracuse, of Macedonia, and of Egypt under the Ptolemies, though plentiful enough, equally conspicuous by its beauty of execution. One of the most recent finds in Russia occurred in 1895 at Reni, on the Pruth, and consisted of a large number of gold staters of Philip of Macedon. The discovery shews how widely spread #© # # UNIQUE OR REMARKABLE COINS 41 was the distribution of this coin, of which the hoard had been probably buried during centuries. When we come to the Roman coins, we first meet with the Roman ces in all its varied divisions and periodical gradations of weight, of which more will be said elsewhere; there are in the Consular or Republican Series certain families, of whose currency the examples are of the utmost rarity, and have baffled the researches of the most ardent and generous col- lectors, while others are common to excess even in fine state. The Yorke Moore cabinet lacked many examples to the last. The denarii, with the portraits of Julius Csesar, Pompey, Mark Antony, Antony and Cleopatra, etc., the VictoriaU, and the Family and Romano- Campanian gold, are always desirable. Of the Imperial Roman and Colonial money the proportion of notable pieces is large, and the normal rarities numerous. No brass or copper of Otho of Roman origin, and no first size of any kind, have yet been reported; the first brass of Matidia, Marciana, Plotina, Pertinax, and others, and the aurei, and even third brass, of more obscure reigns, are extremely difficult to procure. All the coins of Julia, daughter of Augustus, and wife of Agrippa, are rare ; they are only found in the Colonial Series (Pergamus, Corinth, etc.), which also includes the Judma Capta and other interesting his- torical examples. To the English collector the Britannia type in good state, and the gold and even silver of Carausius and Allectus, are to be commended. Throughout the series, but especially in the earlier 42 THE COLLECTOR SERIES first brass, we encounter reverses of great artistic merit and historical interest. Fuller information is to be found in Cohen or in Stevenson ; the former should be consulted preferably, but in all cases opinions are safer as to the scarcity than as to the price. The valuation is apt to be influenced by circumstances. Vast as is the field occupied by the Greek and Roman coinages, it is insignificant in comparison with that which the Continental or Modern Foreign Series covers, and this fact partly arises from the extra- ordinary multiplication of coin-yielding centres under the feudal system. A reference to the "Coinage of the European Continent" will readily show how the subdivision of political authority and the gradual rise of numberless seigniorial fiefs to great power and affluence naturally led to the concession of monetary privileges and the establishment of mints over every part of the country, and to a competition between the different secular and ecclesiastical dignitaries for superiority in the splendour of their money, which frequently eclipsed that of the Crown. It is literally impossible within the compass of a few pages to do more than faintly indicate the principal objects of attention and research among the foreign numismatic productions of the earlier epochs; nearly all are specified by us in our former work; we follow the order of sequence there observed : — Bavaria . . The heavy gold coinage of Maximilian I. of Bavaria, 1598. Saxony . . The gold money of Saxony, 15th and early 16th centuries. UNIQUE OR REMARKABLE COINS 43 Brunswick . . The bracteates and widespread silver pieces of Brunswick-Liineburg. Baden . . All the early money, especially the larger silver of the Margraves. Hesse . . . The very early money and the thalers of 1502-4. Lorraine . . The first dated thaler, 1488, and the first dated gold, 1492. Oldenburg . . The first dated pieces of Oldenburg and Ham- burg. Mecklenburg . The 10-ducats in gold of Wallenstein of Meck- lenburg. Brandenburg . The bracteates and first dated pieces of Bran- denburg. The Colonial series for Hindostan, 1688-94. Prussia . . The coins of Frederic I. of Prussia (1701-13). Juliers . . The early denarii with portraits of the dukes. Stolberg . . The bracteates and early gold of Stolberg. . Austria . . The Austrian schauthalers for Austria, the Tyrol, and Carinthia (1479-1533). The thaler struck in gold with the jugate busts of Maximilian I., Carl V., and Ferdinand.* Bohemia . . The heavy gold money of Frederic of Bohemia (1620). Hungary . . The Hungarian quintuple ducat of 1508.f Transylvania . The earliest gold ducats, silver thalers, etc., of Transylvania. Any coin prior to 1527 ; the 100-ducat piece of 1677. Switzerland . The dicken and thaler of Berne (1492-94), the St Gallen plappart of 1424, the Geneva sol d'or of 1550, the £ convention-thaler of Uri, etc., and the Zurich thaler of 1512. Poland . . The earliest gold money of Poland proper. Russia . . The gold coinage of Russia, 15th century ; the piece in that metal struck by Peter the Great in remembrance of his parents ; silver and copper patterns from 1723 ; the copper uniface roubles of 1725-26, with their divisions. Sweden . . The sterlings in silver prior to Olaf Skotkonung. The earliest Salvator thalers. * Even the normal silver type is rare. t There are casts. 44 THE COLLECTOR SERIES Sweden . . The early money of necessity, including that of Charles of Sudermania. The 5-ducat piece of Christina. The daler of Oxenstierna (1633). Denmark . . The first dated money (1496). The daler of 1523. The gold portugaloser and half portugaloser. The Colonial money of 1683. Flanders . . The gold coinage of Loos and Rummen in Brabant. The gold coinage of Luxemburg under John of Bohemia (1309-46). The gold coinage of Wenceslaus, Duke of Luxemburg, King of Bohemia, Duke of Poland, &c, especially that struck for Prus- sian Poland at Liegnitz, and at his chateau of Mouzaive, near Luxemburg. Cambrai . . The episcopal double mouton d'or, sede vacante (1368-78). The demi-parisis, lower gold and silver denomi- nations, and copper money of Louis of Maele, Count of Flanders, 1346-84, particu- larly the old gold heaume. The heavy gold of the Spanish rulers of Bra- bant. Any copper or other money struck by Maria Theresa for the Austrian Netherlands prior to 1744. Holland . . Any money of the Counts of Holland prior to Thierri VI. (1122-57). The gold rijder of William V. (1346-59), struck for Holland. The Merovingian or other ancient money for West Friesland prior to Bruno III. (1038-57). The double kogger-daalder of 1601 in gold for West Friesland. The gold money of the bishops of Utrecht (1393-1496). The original imitation at Gorinchen of the English noble. The Campen imitation of the sovereign of Mary I. of England. UNIQUE OR REMARKABLE COINS 45 Holland Gueldres Italy . Holy See Venice Savoy . Monaco Florence or Tuscany Bologna Ferrara Any inedited coins of Louis Napoleon, King of Holland (1806-10). The money of Batenborg and Cuilemborg. The Ostrogothic regal copper nummi with portraits. The gold coins of the Lombard kings. The earliest papal danari (8th century), and copper (15th century). The Roman money of the interregna (1049- 1362, 1527-28). The 5-sequin piece of Clement VII. (1525). The earliest scudo di argento (1585). The first gold ducat under Giovanni Dandolo, Doge of Venice (about 1284). The lira and bagattino or sesino Tron. The multiples of the gold ducat (2 to 100). The gold doppia. The gold oselle and double oselle. The | silver ducat struck in gold to pass for 4 ducats. Any patterns. Any deniers or other money prior to Um- berto II. (1080-1108). ".,..,. The gold money of Amadeo VIII. The silver scudo of Carlo II. (1504). The heavy gold of the 17th century (2 to 20 scudi). The coins of Emmanuel Filiberto (the Duke connected with Chillon). Any coins prior to Onorato II. (1605-62). The grosso delta volpe. The mezzo-scudo of 1530 of Nicolo Guicciardini, Gonfaloniere of Florence. The 40 soldi of Alessandro de' Medici, engraved by Cellini. The piastro di oro of Ferdinando II. (1610) engraved by Scipione Mola. The zecchino and double zecchino in gold of Giovanni II. Bentivoglio, with his portrait. The coins of Borso d'Este, first Duke (1450- 71). The gold and copper money of Ercole I. (1471- 1502). 46 THE COLLECTOR SERIES Mirandola . Monteferrato Mantua Milan Pesaro Parma Genoa Saluzzo Franco-Italian ) Series > Sicily and \ Naples j Malta France Lorraine and Bar. Castile and Leon . The zecchino and double zecchino in gold of the learned Gio. Francesco Pico, Signore of Mirandola. The scudo di oro of Teodoro, Marquis of M. about 1310. Any of the early money in fine state. The heavy gold of the earlier Dukes. The denaro of the Virgilius type. The large silver scudi di argento, with portraits. The gold and silver money of the Visconti, for the costumes and head-dresses. There are some exceedingly rare patterns. The copper sesino of Giovanni Sforza. The scudo di argento of Alessandro Farnese (1592). The earlier gold money generally. The heavy gold and silver pieces (multiples of the genovino), usually ill-preserved. The medagUe of 1503 and 1516. Any pieces in fine condition. See Hazlitt, C. o/E., p. 460. See ibid., p. 461-64. The gold coinage of the Merovingians, with their portraits. Certain special pieces of Pepin le Bref and Charlemagne (Hazlitt, p. 467). The royal d'or and other gold coins of Louis IX. The cadUre d'or of Anne of Brittany (1498). The pattern-pieces of Nicholas Briot. The gold and silver deniers de Foi or Pour Epouser, Louis XI 1 1. -XIV. The feudal coinages of Turenne, Dombes, and Sully. Certain patterns of Napoleon I. , especially the pattern 5-francs struck as Protector of the Swiss Confederation. The earliest dated coin (1488), the earliest gold, 1492, the ecus of 1557, 1569, and 1603. Any coin of Bar anterior to 1297. The gold dinhero of Alfonso VIII. (1158-1214), with Arabic legends and A L F. UNIQUE OR REMARKABLE COINS 47 Castile and L8on . The heavy gold of Pedro the Cruel and suc- ceeding kings. See further in Hazlitt, p. 515-16. Aragon . . The heavy gold coinage indicated infrd under Aragon. United Spain . The 50 and 20 excelentes in gold of Ferdinand and Isabella, and Joanna and Charles. The 100-escudi in gold of Philip III. and IV. (1609-33). The 50-reales in silver of various reigns. Portugal . . Any money of Henry of Burgundy, first Count of P. (1094). The niaravedi and marabotins di ouro of Moorish pattern (12th-13th c). The gold dobra of Duarte I. (1433-38). The gold portuguez of Emmanuel (1495-1521). The 4-cruzado piece in gold of Philip II. of Spain, for Portugal. The money of the Cardinal Dom Anthonio (1590). The money of Joao IV. (1640-56) in fine state. The 20,000 reis in gold of Joao V. (1725, 1726). See further in Hazlitt, p. 517, et seq. England . . Certain silver pennies and copper or billon stycas of Northumbria. Gold trim* struck at Canterbury. Earliest coinage of Kent. Coins of Offa of Mercia. Penny of Offa and Cynefrith, his queen. Gold dinher of Offa with Arabic legend and Offa Hex. Penny of Alfred with portrait, struck at London (26 gr.). Pennies of Henry I., Stephen, Stephen and Matilda, Eustace, son of Stephen, etc. ,jchiefly barbarous. Gold penny (?) of Henry III. (1257). Pattern groat of Edward II. or III. (1327). Florin, half florin, and quarter florin of Edward III. in gold (1344). First noble of Edward IV. Sovereign, double sovereign, rial and shilling of Henry VII. 48 THE COLLECTOR SERIES England . . Half George noble of Henry VIII. Triple sovereign and pattern 6-angel piece of Edward VL Half-crown or mezzo-scudo of Philip and Mary, struck for Naples. Three-halfpenny and three-farthing pieces of Elizabeth. Portcullis series of same (1600-1601). Oxford crown of Charles I. Fifty-shilling piece in gold of Cromwell. Petition and Beddite crowns of Charles II. Gold and silver touch-pieces from Charles II. to James III. (Pretender), those in silver the rarer. Pattern guinea of Anne (1702). Pattern guinea of George I. (1727). English Colonies Hog-money of James I. for Bermuda. Maryland shilling, sixpence, groat, and penny. New England uniface shilling, sixpence, and threepence. Massachusetts shilling, sixpence, threepence, and twopence (1652-62). Silver and eopper money struck under Charles II. for Bombay and Madras. Carolina and New England halfpence (1694). Rosa Americana of George I. (1722-24). Rosa Americana pattern twopence of George II. (1733). Port Philip gold ounce, half ounce, and quarter ounce (1853). Scotland . . Any coins which can be found anterior to Alexander I. (1107-24). Pennies, halfpence, and farthings of John Baliol and Robert Bruce (1292-1329). Gold noble of David II., copied from the English coin. Gold unicorn and half-unicorn of James III. (1486). The divisions of the gold rider and St Andrew of James IV. (1488). The gold ryal and St Andrew of James V. (1517). UNIQUE OR REMARKABLE COINS 49 Scotland . . The two-third and one-third Bonnet piece of James V. (1539). The coins of Mary I. with her portrait. The twenty-pound (Scots) piece, hat-piece, and divisions of the unit, all in gold, of James VI. The so-called Cruickston dollar (1565). The forty-shilling piece in silver (1582). The sword and sceptre piece (1604). Charles I. . . The lower divisions of the gold unit, especially the 4th and 8th. James VII. . The silver sixty-shilling-piece (1688). William II. (III. The silver sixty-shilling piece (1699). of England) The gold pistole and half pistole for Darien (1701). Any Scotish billon or copper coins in fine state are more or less rare. The coins in billon, silver, and gold struck by the sovereigns of England in various parts of France from Henry II. to Henry VIII. constitute a remarkable group, among which are numbered several rarities of the first order, like the gold mouton, chaise, said florin of Edward III., the guiennois and other coins of the Black Prince; the gold salute and gros d'argent of Henry V., the Tournay groat of Henry VIII., dated 1513, and many more pieces, some insignificant as works of art, but valuable as historical and numis- matic relics. Akerman, in his " Numismatic Manual," 1840, gives a very fair account of this peculiar series, which was very imperfectly known to the earlier antiquaries. IV GKEEK COINS There is perhaps no series of coins which, at any period of the world's history, has afforded a measure of instruc- tion and entertainment to scholars and students, as well as to collectors, equal to that created and maintained by the money of Ancient Greece, and of the countries subject to Greek influence, in all metals from the seventh century B.C. to the third century a.d. The pleasure and profit arising from the survey and inter- pretation of this truly immense body of authentic monu- ments of the religious, social, and political history of the greatest nation of antiquity have been incessant, and prove inexhaustible. No people has ever written its own life so completely, so broadly, so picturesquely as the Hellenes, or in characters so convincing and so imperishable. We are accustomed to speak of Greek and Eoman coins as of things intimately allied; but the spirit of the monetary systems of the two countries was essentially different, except when Kome and her Italian neighbours, in the time of the Eepublic, em- ployed Greek artists and models. Neither in the Archaic currency, based on the ces, nor in the so-called Consular or Family Group of coins, is local influence GREEK COINS 51 perceptible ; and when we place the regular examples of Eoman workmanship side by side with those of republican and Hellenic origin, we have no difficulty in estimating the disparity between the two schools of sentiment, art, and design. Of all the classes of ancient money which engage the attention of numismatists and amateurs, there is pro- bably none on which they are more apt to fix at the outset, and to which they more frequently revert and remain permanently loyal. In comparison with all other European systems, the Greek excels in its undy- ing interest as a faithful reflection of the religious cults, the social feelings, the popular usages, and the political transactions and vicissitudes of an unique nationality, which once made its influence sensible over a great part of the civilised world, and yet not only could not transmit its peculiar genius to other succeeding com- munities, but survived sufficiently long to witness the decline of its own glory as a nursery and mistress of the arts. Beyond the services which these precious archives have rendered to other departments of know- ledge, we have to consider the obligations under which we lie to their survivorship for our acquaintance, de- rivable from no other sources, with long dynasties of forgotten rulers and the lost sites of cities formerly populous and powerful. The agencies which most influentially contributed to the formation of style, and, on the other hand, to the periodical changes and vicissitudes in the character of ancient Greek money, were primarily a deep and widely 52 THE COLLECTOR SERIES diffused religious feeling, varying in its incidence in different localities ; and, secondarily, the evils arising from foreign or domestic wars, changes of government, and financial depression. The earliest coins are the most attractive, if for no other reason, because they reflect most vividly and sincerely the daily worship of the simple populations among which they were intended to circulate. It is impossible to over-estimate the share which strong religious faith, even to the point of super- stitious credulity, had in the making of the Greek people. Dr Head divides into five periods the rise, progress, and later stages of Greek numismatic production : (i.), Archaic ; (ii.) Transitional ; (iii.) Finest Art ; (iv.) Later Fine Art; (v.) Decline of Art. This method of dis- tribution is, of course, susceptible of modified treat- ment and liable to exceptions. The Archaic era Dr Head places between 700 and 480 B.C. ; the transi- tional, between 480 and 415 ; the Finest Art, between 415 and 336; the Later Fine Art, between 336 and 280; and the Decline, between 280 and 146. All these figures are necessarily approximate and tentative ; the broad feature in the question appears to be, that we have in our hands for study a progressive succession of monuments, which, from the seventh century b.c. to somewhere about the middle of the fourth, afford evi- dence of a continuous onward movement, culminating in the noble Sicilian coins and medallions of Kimon and other known engravers at Syracuse and elsewhere,* * Our knowledge of the ancient Greek artists in this department GREEK COINS 53 who often transferred to their dies masterpieces of sculp- ture or painting less durable than metal, and that on many accounts the value of the intermediate grades of excellence or improvement is equal to that of the most finished examples by the greatest masters. It is upon the period of decadence, which, when it first commenced, there was no means of arresting, that we cannot refrain from looking with greater sorrow than interest. There was that difference between the First Epoch and the Last that there is between the flow and the ebb of the tide; but here there was no rally, not even among the political inheritors of the soil on which all these examples of skill and refinement saw the light. But in the Greek coinage there is another consideration, of which the collector becomes sensible, and that is the liability to unequal work in the money of the same ruler produced, if not concurrently, at least within a short interval. The disparity of execution often arises from the circumstances under which the particular die was engraved, from the call for an issue of money on a sudden emergency in a distant province, or in the absence of skilled operatives ; and in many of the Greek series we are able to place side by side two tetra- drachms, or other pieces of contemporary date, where the type is identical and the workmanship perceptibly differs. The same phenomenon occurs in the English and French coinages ; and that is more usually due to has considerably increased within the last few years, and since Dr Head's Bistoria Numorum appeared in 1887, several new names have been recovered. 54 THE COLLECTOR SERIES the employment of a provincial artist, as in the case of the Oxford twenty-shilling piece of inferior style, and in some of the copper currency of Henry III. and IV. of France. The original conception of coined money arose among a people whose commercial prosperity needed such facili- ties for exchange with distant countries, and who pos- sessed the means, in rich gold-mines, of establishing a metallic medium at once intelligible and convenient. The introduction of the coinage, which is usually re- garded as the basis of that of the Greeks, has to be sought for outside the limits of Hellas and on another continent ; and this circumstance involves the arrange- ment of any book devoted to a survey of the subject rather complicated and perplexing. As the Historia Numorum is the standard work of reference, it was judged best to obey the initiative or precedent there given; but the principle followed is not perfectly clear or satisfactory, as Dr Head not only places Lydia near the conclusion of his volume, but com- mences it with the Greek and Roman settlements in Western Europe. The story of the invention of money by the Lydians of the seventh century B.C. has been told often enough to have become familiar to all. Whether a specimen of the maiden mint exists we do not know. It would be very difficult to determine the pre- cise age of such a piece ; but here was the Asiatic birth- place of the Greek numismatic movement, which owed nothing to its foreign founders save the happy idea of converting to practical purposes the mineral resources GREEK COINS 55 of Lydia. A very considerable interval must have elapsed — two centuries or upward — before the Greeks began to acquire the faculty of communicating to lumps or discs of metal their impressions of natural objects ; and the gold ingots of Lampsacus, attributed to the fifth century B.C., may be the most ancient memorials in existence of the bold and free treatment which we see at length carried to such perfection during the best period of Art. The portraiture on Greek coins is undoubtedly, as a rule, less realistic than that on Eoman money ; and it may be true that the lineaments found on urban or municipal pieces were intended to personify the tutelary genius of the locality. But at the same time numerous are the instances where the likeness stamped on an ancient Greek coin carries with it a conviction that it is neither more nor less than an idealised transcript of the face of the sovereign in whose name the money was struck. Numismatists are very steadfast in their adher- ence to the contrary view ; but it seems to us one of those points which are eminently open to discussion, and which may be settled hereafter on a new footing. Keightley remarks in his Notes on Virgil's Bucolics, that " it was the general belief of at least the educated classes at that time at Eome, that the gods of the popular creed were merely deified men"; this opinion corroborates my own. The utmost which strikes us as capable of being urged in support of the existing theory is that the early engraver aimed at investing the personage whom it was his 56 THE COLLECTOR SERIES business to portray with a kind of divine afflatus calculated to impress the popular fancy. With the exception of certain cases where the portrait on a Greek coin is almost obviously a vera effigies, as in the Syrian, Egyptian, Bactrian, and some of the Macedonian series, the heads must be accepted, we think, as flattering resemblances of the rulers themselves, as we see in the Roman imperial currency, and in that, coming much later down, of Napoleon I. But we have modern analogy on our side to assist in showing that even allegorical and emblematical figures on a coinage are generally traceable to an actual individual, and were adopted by the artists as the objects nearest at hand. The portraits on the staters and tetradrachms of Philip of Macedon and on the silver money of his son Alex- ander the Great possess a verisimilitude which is very persuasive, and the prevailing character of the head on the more or less coeval tetradrachms of Alexander strike us as far more likely to have resembled the king than that on the posthumous iEsillas piece. Of the metals employed by Greek engravers, electrum, silver, and bronze, were the most usual. The two latter were at all times the most widely diffused ; the electrum money was restricted to particular districts where this natural amalgam of gold and silver, prized as harder than the more precious ore for these purposes, was found. Gold was, in a comparative sense, sparingly used ; and the Greek series in that metal bears a very small pro- portion to those in the other three mineral substances. Modern discovery has added a good deal to our know- GREEK COINS 57 ledge of the electrum coinages of Cyzicus and other localities. For gold, subsequently to the Archaic period, we have to look to Attica, Macedonia, Thessaly, Epirus, Thrace, Sicily, and Egypt; and the Athenian stater and its divisions are among the rarities and problems of Greek numismatics, since very few genuine specimens are extant, although the currency is supposed to have had a duration of about half a century (B.C. 394-350.) In the settlement of the order of sequence the prin- ciple followed by Dr Head has been mainly adhered to ; it appears to be to a large extent that approved by Eckhel ; but the present writer would have preferred to change the relative positions assigned in the Historic/, Numorum to Greece and some of its European colonies, and to Lydia and a few other Asiatic centres belong- ing to the First Epoch. The title of Britain to admittance into this section solely rests on the imita- tion by its moneyers of the Macedonian stater in a progressively degraded form. It will be sufficient to glance at the Historia Numorum to make it immediately clear that what here follows is merely a general sketch, sufficient to prepare any one to estimate or gauge the extent and nature of the task which he may have before him either as a collector or as a student. Perhaps Dr Head has passed over rather too lightly the bronze coins, which constitute in a high state of preservation at once a beautiful and an inex- pensive branch of study or pursuit, and may be confi- dently recommended to amateurs on these grounds. 58 THE COLLECTOR SERIES But purity of condition is here of the first import- ance.* Hispania. — (i.) Greek coinage, 4th-3rd century b.c. Mints : Emporise, Rhoda, Gades, Ebusus. Types : imi- tations of the archaic Phocsean drachma, with the divisions into thirds, sixths, twelfths, and twenty- fourths, and various emblems or symbols : a cock, a cuttlefish, a bull's head, etc. The coins of Rhoda have a rose, those of Gades or Cadiz the head of the Tyrian Herakles, and the Ebusus series Kabeiros with a hammer and a serpent. The last are not later than 217 B.C., when the Baleares became Roman, (ii.) Hispano-Car- thaginian coinage, 234-10 B.C. (iii.) Romano-Iberian and Latin coinages, 225-130 B.C. : (1) money struck at Emporiae and other places in Hispania Citerior and Ulterior, in the names of certain tribes which occupied the surrounding territory, with Iberian inscriptions; (2) money struck under Roman authority {victoriati, denarii, divisions of the reduced ces, etc.), in silver and bronze with Iberian or Latin legends, (iv.) Coins with Latin legends, 133-80 B.C. (v.) Coins with bilingual legends, Latin and Iberian, 80-72 B.C. (vi.) Latin or Roman coins, 49 B.C. to A.D. 41. Gallia. — Here, as indeed in Hispania, we have to study two distinct classes of coinage : (1) that of foreign colonists on the seaboard; (2) that of the Gauls them- selves. The most ancient settlement was that about * The present point* since the first edition of this small volume appeared, has attracted almost more than expected attention, and the ancient Greek bronze in fine preservation has increased ten times in value within a few years. GREEK COINS 59 600 B.C. at Marseilles by Phocseans, who appear to have struck for their use a drachma and its divisions of archaic type, first known from the trouvaille d'Auriol (1867), and perhaps existing for us only in remains of the fifth century B.C. These coins in their types and legends refer to the worship of Apollo and Artemis. A drachma of fine work, attributed to the fourth century, has the head of Artemis on obverse, and on reverse a lion with Massa in Greek characters; this beautiful piece was soon imitated in a degraded style. During the Eoman period the drachma was adjusted to the weight of the victoriatus, introduced into Spain by the conquerors; and there are bronze coins of this time with the heads of Apollo or Pallas, (ii.) The civil currency having, as it is thought, ceased, and the Mar- seilles and other mints closed, about 50 B.C., the coins circulating in the four usual divisions of Gaul thence- forward to the Merovingian era were either the Koman money or the barbarous imitations of it side by side with those of the Greek stater of Macedon and other ancient models, which may be referred back to the third century B.C., and survive in large numbers in various metals, with types seldom intelligible or (except by con- jecture) capable of localisation. This description of currency extended over the whole of Gaul and Belgium and parts of Britain and Spain. Britannia. — This section concerns Greek numis- matics, as we have just said, no further than the copies of the Macedonian stater or degraded imitations of Gaulish reproductions of it. We have offered a few 60 THE COLLECTOR SERIES remarks on this subject under another head, to which the ancient money of Britain may perhaps be more properly referred. Italia. — Of the coins of Grseco-Italian origin we have those in gold and silver (the latter often uniface) of Etruria, which sometimes bear marks of value, and appear to have followed the decimal system, and in bronze. The gold is of two standards and the silver of three, both more or less coexistent and local, those of the Eubo'ic-Syracusan one being usually uniface. The types are numerous and varied : obverse, head of Hermes, Gorgon's head, seahorse, etc.; reverse, a wheel, circle, crescent, sphynx, etc. The bronze series is large, inte- resting, and, on the whole, beautiful; it is of two classes — the cast pieces, of larger size and thick fabric, and the struck pieces, of later date. The types are numerous, and often resemble those on the coins in the superior metals; and all possess a strong interest in connection with the obscure cults of this region. The other leading divisions are : — Umbria. — The coinage is wholly of bronze, and largely consists at first of the Roman ces. Some of the money is almond-shaped or oblong, and it is chiefly cast. The chief centres were Ariminum (Rimini),Iguvium (Gubbio), and Tuder (Todi). PiCENUM. — Chief centres: Ancona, Ascoli, Fermo, and Hadria. The first place, owing its name to its situation at a bend of the coast — whence on its coins we get a bent arm — was an important depot for Illyrian trade and the seat of a temple of Aphrodite. It was of GREEK COINS 61 Syracusan origin. The known coins of this region seem to be chiefly Eoman of the third century B.C. and later. Vestini. — Alliance-coins with Kome, 301-268 B.C. Imitations of the money of Umbria and Picenum. Latium. — The cast Eoman ces and its divisions, and struck coins of various towns, 4th-3rd century B.C. Some of those of Cora have the Campanian bull crowned, and of Signia the head of Silenos and a boar's head. Samnium. — No money prior to the Koman coinage about the third century B.C. The district was long held by village communities, which may be supposed to have employed the currencies of their neighbours. Frentani. — Money of third century B.C. in retro- grade Oscan characters. Of Larinum we have bronze money only, third century B.C., struck coins of the uncial reduction of the ces. Campania. — A province, containing many important coin-yielding centres, and essentially Greek in the char- acter of its money. The latter is chiefly in silver and bronze ; the former was superseded about 268 B.C. by the Koman currency {denarius) ; the latter remained in use much later. Of some places silver only is known, of others bronze only. It is to this region and to the period of the war with Hannibal, about 210 B.C., that the series of Komano-Campanian gold coins, the earliest money in that metal struck under Koman authority, is ascribable. Many singularly beautiful types belong to Campania, including those of Neapolis with the anthro- pokephalous bull common to the coins of this district. Some of the pieces with Oscan legends are perhaps to 62 THE COLLECTOR SERIES be referred hither. The worship of Dionysos was more or less widely diffused through Campania, sometimes in conjunction with a female divinity. Apulia. — The earliest coins are supposed to be those of Tarentum, before Apulia acquired its own monetary system. The types resemble those of Campania ; they are of silver and bronze, the latter both cast and struck. The coin-centres were numerous, and include Neapolis Peucetise, the modern Polignano, a town whose ancient history is exclusively derived from its coins, of which there have been many finds. Calabria. — This district included Tarentum and Brundusium (Brindisi) ; the money of the former, com- mencing with the sixth century B.C., is at first of archaic type and of incuse uniface fabric, but attained great ex- cellence and beauty. The coins from the outset exhibit on obverse Taras on a dolphin, and some examples pre- sent the mythical founder, and son of Neptune, on both sides, variously posed. In the fourth century we find gold first struck ; but silver was the prevailing metal. The bronze is late. Sicilia. — At first this island possessed coins of an Italian type, introduced by the settlers from the main- land; but as the Greeks established themselves here, the style of the money became by degrees Hellenised, and acquired in course of time an unsurpassed excel- lence and celebrity, the cities which arose, both along the coast and inland, emulating each other in the beauty of their numismatic products and the choice of the most skilful engravers, of whom in several cases GREEK COINS 63 the names are preserved. Dr Head divides the mone- tary annals into eight epochs, which embrace those of archaic art and of decline under the Eoman authority. The Sicilian medallion, which was, in fact, the ten- drachma piece, is well known ; the agonistic type of the reverse is common to the tetradrachm and didrachm, and probably does not allude to any specific event; the triquetra, which was copied on the modern cur- rency of the Two Sicilies, and on that of the Isle of Man, was first introduced under Agathocles (317-289 B.C.), by whom it is supposed to have been intended as a token of his sovereignty over the whole island. The most remarkable coins in this series are those of Agri- gentum, Camarina, Catana, Gela, Leontini, Naxos, Panormos, and Syracuse. Many varieties of the Syra- cusan dekadrachm exist, and likewise many counterfeits. Macedon. — This ancient kingdom appears to have been at one time under tribal and separate governments, which developed into coin-producing centres, in some instances of considerable importance and volume. The Macedonian coinage, which comprises, on more than one account, some of the most interesting remains of this kind, is now divided by the highest authority into eight districts or periods: — 1. The Pangcean District; 2. the Emathian District; 3. the Bisaltian District; 4. Chalcidice ; 5. the Strymonian and Botticean Dis- tricts; 6. the Regal Period; 7. the Kings of Pceonia ; 8. Macedon under the Romans. We have in the present compass altogether a line body of numismatic examples commencing with the bold archaic style of the sixth 64 THE COLLECTOR SERIES century B.C., and with the productions of the rich mineral country round Mount Pangaeum, where the money illustrates the cults of Dionysos and Silenos. The standards were successively the Phocaic, Babylo- nian, and Phoenician. The currency of the Orrescii comprised the silver octadrachm. The money of the Bisaltae is of special importance, because it formed the type employed by the earliest regal moneyers under Alexander I. When Xerxes was in this neighbourhood, during his invasion of Greece, the Odomanti were work- ing the gold and silver mines ; and it is worth noting that the camels of the king of Persia were attacked by lions, which at that time abounded in this part of Greece. The lion is a frequent Pangaean type, together with the peculiar kind of bull also at that epoch belong- ing here. Associated with the Strymonian division are the beautiful coins of Amphipolis. The original capital of Macedon under its kings was iEgae, of which some of the latest money may have been of regal origin ; but the earliest piece directly identifiable with a ruler is of Bisaltian pattern and style, with the name of Alexander I. (498-54 B.c.) substituted for the older legend. Only a silver octa- drachm of Phoenician standard is thus inscribed ; and there is great obscurity as to the attribution of coins, even to succeeding sovereigns, from the absence of names. Of course the greatest share of interest centres round the common and copious coinages of Philip II. and his son Alexander III. (359-23 B.C.), of whom the former introduced a species of bimetallism, and greatly GREEK COINS 65 improved the style of the gold and silver money, substi- tuting the celebrated gold stater for the Persian daric previously in use. Alexander resumed the principle of a single standard, owing to the depreciation of gold by the reopening of the mines at Philippi by his father, and their vast yield of ore.* The money struck by Alexander alone constitutes a study, and it is divisible into two classes : that struck in his lifetime ; that struck after his death, or in imitation of his types, both in silver and in gold. But the entire regal series com- mands attention from the portraits which it furnishes down to the iEsillas tetradrachm with one said to be a likeness of Alexander himself. The tetradrachm of Antigonus Gonatas, sometimes ascribed to Doson, ap- pears to refer, from the type of the reverse, to the naval victory obtained by him over the Egyptian fleet off Cos in 265 p B.c.f The Koman coinage for Macedon usually bears the word Leg, to indicate that it was struck by the authority of the Roman Legatus or deputy ; but the most valuable relic of this class is the gold stater of the Roman general T. Quinctius Flami- ninus, assigned to the period following the battle of Cynoscephalse (196-90 B.C.), and of which the exact history is unknown. The coins of Pseonia, which begin with those of Lycceius (359 B.C.), after the revolt of the Pseonians, at the death of Perdiccas III., from the Macedonian * See St John's Manners and Customs of Ancient Greece, 1842, 1,5. t See a note in Reliquiae Hearnianw, 1869, i. 45. E 66 THE COLLECTOR SERIES yoke, form a short series spreading over about sixty years, and composed of silver tetradrachms of reduced module, didrachms, drachms, and tetraboli. Lucania. — This region, peopled by colonists from Tarentum, Thurium, Samnium, etc., comprised the very important and prolific mints of Metapontum, Poseidonia, Paestum, Sybaris, and Thurium. At first it employed the money of other cities not originally included in its boundaries, Metapontum, Sybaris, and Poseidonia among them ; but eventually, down to the Roman time, about 210 B.C., the various towns produced a remark- ably fine series of coins, chiefly silver, ranging from the archaic uniface incuse type to the 10-drachma piece. A wolfs head found in the field on some of the reverses is significant of the name of the locality. The ear of corn which accompanies the coins of Metapontum symbolises the worship of Ceres or Demeter. The head of Herakles (sometimes with a ram's horn and ear) on those of Heraklea has a similar import. On some of the money of Metapontum the river Acheloiis occurs in the form of a nude man hold- ing a patera and a reed. A large assortment of beauti- ful and interesting examples is to be found in this series. Of the archaic incuse coins the authenticity should be assured. The silver pieces of Sybaris which we possess seem to belong to a coinage of very short duration (453-451 B.C.); they are all incuse. Bruttii. — This was another region where the incuse uniface pattern at first prevailed; it included the coinage of Croton, Caulonia, Rhegium, and Western GREEK COINS 67 Locri. No silver was coined after the submission to Kome, 272 B.C., and the bronze ceased about 203 B.C. Certain silver coins of Khegium equivalent to the Sicilian litra were intended exclusively for the com- merce with that island. There must have been an enor- mous output of currency between the commencement, about 550 B.C., and the final close of monetary rights in 89 B.C. On the coins of Croton alone we may read many instructive lessons respecting the religious worship and beliefs current there in remote times among the dis- ciples of Pythagoras. There are others of Ehegium with a mule-car and a hare, commemorative of an Olympian victory gained with the former by Anaxilas, and of the worship of Pan under the symbol of a hare. As regards the seated bearded figure on some of the money of this place, it certainly appears most reasonable to agree with Dr Head in assuming it to represent a rural divinity, and the dog, duck, or cow, which generally accompany it, as cognate adjuncts. We see among the coins of Terina some of the finest specimens of Greek art. Herakles already presents himself here as elsewhere on the money as an apotheosis, whence it may be inferred, perhaps, that at the very dawn of history his personality and patria had faded into an obscure tradition, and so with other pieces of Hellenic folk-lore. It seems clear from the plural genitive form on the coins that Bruttii, rather than Bruttium, is the correct designation. Thrace. — The money of this region was composed of that of the towns on the southern coast, the Thracian 68 THE COLLECTOR SERIES Chersonesos, the Islands of Thrace, the European coast of the Propontis, the Danubian Provinces, the Regal Series, the Inland Settlements, the Scythian dynasts. The most important places were iEnus, Maroneia, Abdera, Thasos (the seat of rich gold mines), Byzantium, Panticapaeum. The worships of Dionysos, Hera, Apollo, Herakles, and Artemis Tauropolos are traceable in the coins. Not in a technical, but in a human sense, Tomi, between Istrus and Callatia, commands our respect as the place of exile of the poet Ovid, and of his death. The regal series extends from the fifth to the first century B.C.; but the best period is that of Lysimachus (323-281), of whom there are coins in gold and silver of good style, and existing both in contemporary or early imitations, and the former (the gold stater) frequently of doubtful authenticity. The Greek currency of Byzantium is common in silver, and there seem to have been alliance-coins between Byzan- tium and Chalcedon in 270 B.C., but we have none of the iron money mentioned by Aristophanes. Of the monetary productions of the Roman epoch, and of the Grseco-Scythian series, there are plentiful examples in silver and bronze; those belonging to Odessus are of good style and fabric. Gold was sparingly used, and its survival in a stater of Panticapaeum testifies, perhaps, to the commercial prosperity of the ancient Kertch in the fourth century B.C. A common colonial type in the Chersonesos is that with Silenos carrying a wine- skin over his shoulder. Thessaly. — This was a country, where Poseidon was GREEK COINS 69 universally revered as the author of the miracle to which it owed its existence as dry land, and in whose honour games, or taureia, where the youth displayed their skill in seizing wild bulls by the horns and bringing them to earth, were formerly held; this legend, and the grazing horse, significant of the rich pastures of the Thessalian plains, present themselves on the coins, of which some are of very fine work. Dr Head classifies the money under three periods. About 480-344 B.C., when the Thessalian autonomy ceased for a time, and the Macedonian currency took its place ; 302-286 B.C., a temporary autonomous coinage of certain cities, after the visit to Thessaly of Demetrius Poliorcetes; 196- 146 B.C., a federal coinage, which terminated only on the reduction of Thessaly to a Koman province. The chief cities were Crannon, Herakleia (where Herakles was worshipped), Pharsalos, Pherae, and Larissa. The iEtsei inhabited the mountain where Herakles is said to have died. The island of Peparethus was once called Euoinos, in allusion to the excellence of its wines. Besides Poseidon and Herakles, Athena, Apollo, Asklepios, and Achilles occur on the Thessalian money at various epochs down to Koman times. The head on the drachma figured at p. 253 of Head has been supposed to be a portrait of the hetaira Lamia, mistress of Demetrius Poliorcetes. Attention should be paid to the rich variety of subjects on the archaic currency of Larissa, and the interesting treatment of the reverses, with the eponymous nymph Larissa holding up a mirror, playing at ball, fastening her sandal, etc. 70 THE COLLECTOR SERIES Illyria. — The coinage is constituted of three classes : civic, regal, and that of the islands. It extends from the fourth to the first century B.c. The chief places were Apollonia and Dyrrhachium (Durazzo). Some of the money is of Macedonian type, that Power having the ascendency here from about 211 to 196 B.C. The regal series is very short and unimportant. Of the Illyric islands, Pharos is the best known, and produced coins from the fourth to the second century B.C. The Illyrio-Epirote series is similarly a brief one, chiefly arising from the existence of silver mines at Damastium, whose currency, with its mineral wealth, is recorded by Strabo. Epiros. — The Epirote coinage forms three classes: the money struck at Ambracia in silver, and in bronze at Cassope and elsewhere, before 295 B.C. ; (ii.) that of the short regal period, 295-72 ; (iii.) that of the Republic. The prevailing types are the veiled head of Dione and the conical pillar of Apollo of Ambracia, the jugate heads of Zeus and Dione, the former generally with the oak -wreath, significant of the oak of Dodona, or the head of Zeus alone. The one piece with Pthias and the veiled head of Pthia is supposed to represent the mother of Pyrrhus, who struck money not only at Locri in Bruttium and Syracuse, but in Southern Italy. There are no coins subsequent to 168 B.C., except some in bronze, attributed to the priest of the temple of Zeus at Dodona, with the heads of Zeus and Artemis on either side. CORCYRA. — A wealthy commercial city, which obtained GREEK COINS 71 its independence in the sixth century B.C., and pro- duced a long series of autonomous coinage of silver and bronze down to Roman imperial times. The uniform archaic type is a cow suckling a calf with incuse reverse in compartments, inscribed with devices. The silver stater of Corinthian weight was sub- sequently reinforced by the drachma, the half and quarter drachma, the victoriatus, the half victoriatus, and the obol. The standard of the money declined in course of time, and about 300 B.c. the silver stater of reduced weight was withdrawn. The types of many of the bronze coins suggest the Dionysiac cult. In 338 B.C. Corcyra had fallen into Macedonian hands, but this did not affect the cur- rency further than the insertion of Kor, as an indica- tion that the money, which had become in the Corinthian cities of a uniform standard, belonged here. The Roman series comes down to Caracalla, and appears to have been also autonomous. Acaknania. — As far back as the fifth century B.C. this country formed itself into a confederacy, with Stratos on the Achelous as its capital, and there are coins in silver (Corinthian staters) and bronze. Stratos, Leucas, and Thyrreium were the principal centres and mints. The heads of Zeus, Apollo, Pallas, Bellerophon, and the personified Achelous occur on the money. The Romans partly broke up the union by severing Leucas from it in 167 B.C. ; and the later coinage bears the names of magistrates or strategoi. It is noticeable that the bronze currency of Leucas about 300 B.c. is 72 THE COLLECTOR SERIES often struck over pieces of Philip of Macedon, There was probably no coinage after the second century B.C. jEtolia. — The earliest iEtolian money appears to be of a federal cast, and to refer to the period from the third to the second century B.C., when iEtolia formed itself into a League to resist first the Macedonians, and subsequently the Gauls. The seated figure on the reverse type of the earliest tetradrachms represents ./Etolia armed, with military trophies, and is supposed to have been copied from the statue at Delphi, placed there in grateful memory of the victories over the invaders. There is a Gaulish trumpet at the feet of the heroine, who sits on a pile of Macedonian and Gaulish shields mingled together. There are a few bronze coins with iEtolian types belonging to cities outside the League, but in alliance with it. Locris (Eastern), or Locri Opuntii. — It is to be suspected that the archaic money of this region has been to a large extent lost, or has yet to be recovered. The oldest at present known belongs to Thronium, and is a silver obolos with a bearded head on the observe and an incuse reverse. The coinage of the best period of the Locri, whose capital town or city was Opus, is between 400 B.c. and 338 B.C., the date of the battle of Chseroneia, when the exclusive monetary rights were withdrawn by Philip of Macedon from the capital and transferred to Locris in genere. The inscrip- tion on the money (silver staters and hemidrachms) was changed from Opuntion to Zocron. The Locrian coinage was suspended under Macedonian rule, and under that rL,A 1 C V . IVEflSITY OF If |i GREEK COINS 73 of Rome we have coins only of the two short reigns of Galba and Otho. The Locri Ozolae appear to have belonged to the iEtolian League. Of Amphissa and CEantheia there are coins of the second century B.C. Phocis. — The coinage commences about the middle of the sixth century B.C., and is of federal character, emanating from a confederation of two-and-twenty cities, whose Amphictyonic folk-moot or Synedrion as- sembled near Daulis in a building known as the Phoki- Jcon. We have coins of various character from the middle of the sixth to the middle of the second century B.C. The principal cities were Daulis and Delphi. The types of the bull's head and of the boar with the head of Artemis are symbolical of ancient worships (see Head, p. 287). Of Delphi there are very ancient coins in silver with two rams' heads and two dolphins on obverse, and on reverse an incuse square cantonned with dolphins, allusively to the name of the place, as well as, perhaps, the worship of the Delphian Apollo. Between 357 and 346 B.C. money of a different character was struck as the result of the war concluded in the last-named year ; and the silver staters, drachms, and diobols may be referred to the year (346) of the meeting of the Syne- drion and the Pythian games, the reverses bearing Amphictyonon. From this date to the reign of the Emperor Hadrian the coinage of Delphi was suspended, but it was restored under that prince and the Anto- nines. It is interesting to recollect that Plutarch the historian was a member of the Amphictyonic council and priest of the temple of Apollo at Chseroneia. 74 THE COLLECTOR SERIES Archaic coins are known of other towns of Phocis — Lilsea and Neon. The figure on one of Elateia of the second century B.C. is identified with the bronze statue of Athena mentioned by Pausanias. Bceotia. — Like Phocis, this State at a very early period of its numismatic history resorted to federalism. The most ancient examples of currency, however, are to be found among the series struck at Thebes in the sixth century B.C. on an iEginetic model, with the type of the Boeotian shield, a religious emblem connected with the dedication of golden ones, probably to Athena, in the Acropolis at Coroneia, the place of assembly for the Boeotian League. The Theban coinage, at first primi- tive in fabric and style and uninscribed, acquired an artistic character in the succeeding century, when the rude incuse reverses were superseded by a more elegant and attractive pattern, and to this era the rare gold coinage belongs. Other important coin -yielding centres were Tanagra on the Asopus ; Coroneia, just mentioned ; Haliartos, celebrated as the seat of a temple of Neptune (who is represented on its money) and as a second meeting-place of the Amphictyonic council; Orcho- menos, a very early commercial city in relations with iEgina and Pharae. Athena and Poseidon seem to have been the divinities chiefly revered throughout the Boeotian confederacy ; but there are also vestiges of the cults of Dionysos, Eros, Aphrodite, and Herakles. After the destruction of Thebes in 335 B.C. and the suspension of autonomy, the periods of prosperity and numismatic production were intermittent and limited ; GREEK COINS 75 the most glorious interval of political restoration was that associated with the names of Pelopidas and Epaminondas (379-338 B.C.). The Koman imperial coinage for Boeotia is only of three reigns (Galba, Hadrian, Domitian); but long prior to this period (146 b.c.) the financial condition of Greece had become very unsettled, and here money of necessity appeared in the form of bronze coins made to pass current for silver values. A special group of Theban coinage for Bceotia was that struck under Macedonian authority, with the type of Alexander the Great and the Boeotian shield as a subsidiary emblem on reverse (288-244 B.C.). But there can be no doubt* that the most interesting epoch is that which immediately followed the archaic one. Eubcea. — The oldest coinage of this island is assignable to the seventh century B.C. and to the town of Chalcis. The other principal places were Carystos, Cyme, Eretria, and Histiaea. Of Chalcis the first money consisted of staters in electrum and the tetradrachm and its divi- sions in silver. That of Eretria is remarkable for the type of the Gorgon's head and the irregularity of the module ; but subsequently to the wars with Persia the fabric and type underwent a change. From 336 to 197 B.c. there was no autonomous currency, but it revived after the liberation of Greece by Flamininus. The Histiaean money carries on it the recollection of the fertility of the vines of the district. The coinage of Eubcea may be divided into four periods : first auto- nomous period (including archaic pieces); Macedonian period; second autonomous period; Koman imperial 76 THE COLLECTOR SERIES period — the whole extending over about five centuries (700-146 B.C.). I may refer to General Fox's paper on a then inedited silver coin of Glauconnesus.* Attica. — The most ancient money current in Attica is thought to have been that of iEgina, and this heavy coinage was probably superseded in the time of Solon by one of lighter weight, afterward known as the Attic or Eubo'ic standard, and bearing the proportion of 73 to 100. But the Athenians seem to have had a com- mercial as well as a current standard, and the former, when the Euboic weight was introduced, was still maintained for trading purposes, the mina being money of account and = 138 drachmas. The types of the coinage varied little, but the fabric and style, from being extremely barbarous and primitive, grew more refined and artistic. The denominations were unusually numerous after the earliest period,f and comprised all varieties of size and value in silver and bronze, from the dekadrachm to the lepton. The gold money is remarkably scanty, and does not begin till the fourth century B.C. There are the stater, the drachma, the triobol, the ekte, and the hemiekton, of all of which the examples offered in commerce are frequently spu- rious. Nearly the whole of the silver currency down to about a.d. 220, when a new type was introduced with improved methods of coinage, is negligently executed and struck; and it is remarkable that the * Communicated to the Transactions of the Numismatic Society > 1869. t Dr Head speaks of 106 series of Attican money. GREEK COINS 77 finest numismatic period is that when Athens had ceased to exercise preponderant influence in Greece. The bronze money consisted of the kcdkous, the kollu- bos, and the Upton. Four kolluboi or seven lepta were = one kalkous, and eight kalkoi were = one obol. Of the Demi of Attica, Eleusis alone struck autonomous coins, and for a brief term (350-320 b.c.) ; here was the temple of Triptolemos, whose name was associated with the Eleusinian Mysteries, and the ephemeral coinage refers to this cult. So at Oropos and Salamis, Amphi- araos and Ajax had an oracle and statue and a temple respectively. For a minute classification of the later money of Attica we must refer to the Historia Nvmo- rum. There are types belonging to the Roman period, as elsewhere. Megaris. — This minor state contained the townships of Megara, iEgosthena, and Pagse, on the Corinthian Gulf. Megara was a prosperous place before the Mace- donian conquest in 338 B.C. The best numismatic period appears to have been from 307 to 243 B.O., when Megara joined the Achaean League; the types per- petuate the worship of Apollo, the reputed builder of the original walls of the city ; and the obelisk observed on some of them is identified with the stone which was termed Apollo Karinos. In honour of this divinity the lesser Pythian games were celebrated here. Of all three places imperial coins are known, but the reverses preserve their Hellenic spirit and complexion. ^Egina. — This island is claimed as the cradle of ancient European coinage, its famous tortoises dating 78 THE COLLECTOR SERIES back to the seventh century B.C. ; but perhaps they are not much anterior to the money of Chalcis and a few other points within the Greek frontier. The most remote in date may be those of heavy Phoenician standard, of which a find of four specimens occurred at Thera in 1821. The electrum stater of the archaic tortoise type in the French national collection may be the oldest piece belonging to this locality in existence, and it is described as unique. Dr Head distributes the coinage into eight periods, inclusively of the Roman; and the last is in this case the only one, singularly enough, where the treatment exhibits any variety, the more natural delineation of the sea or land tortoise having previously been the chief mark of progress. The earlier coins are uninscribed; in the inner reverses of those of the fifth century certain letters occur on either side. The bronze money begins in the first quarter of the same century. Corinthia. — The numismatic archaeology of Corinth is intimately associated with the myth of Bellerophon and Pegasos, and the winged steed forms the standard type of its fine coinage, appearing even on pieces of archaic fabric and pattern, and accompanied on the later currency by the helmeted head of Athena, the goddess under whose auspices Bellerophon achieved his exploit. The operations of the mint seem to have con- tinued undisturbed through the Macedonian conquest in 338 B.C. till Corinth joined the Achaean League in 243. From this time its output of autonomous money was intermittent and limited, and in 146 it was destroyed GREEK COINS 79 by the Eomans. After its restoration in 46 by Caesar, the city produced a rich volume of bronze coins, with a large assortment of mythological types, well deserving of study and attention. In this series we meet with one of the rare coins with the name and portrait of Julia, daughter of Augustus. Peloponnesus. — The coinage of this extensive geo- graphical area long consisted of the money of other states — Corinth, iEgina, and Arcadia. The region embraced the important districts of Achaia, Messenia, Laconia, Argolis, and Arcadia, and the three influential and prolific coin-centres t Elis, Sicyon, and Argos, as well as those other well-known political organisations, the Achaean and Arcadian Leagues. Out of all these sources sprang an immense body of currency, almost exclusively silver and bronze, particularly the beautiful work of Elis and the interesting remains of the Ionian Isles, which are powerfully marked by traces of ancient cults. The coinage of Lacedaemon, so far as we are at present aware, commences with the third century B.C., none of the legendary iron money being known, and to this period is referable a curious tetradrachm of good Greek workmanship on obverse, but with a roughly- executed archaic reverse, representing the Apollo of Amycloe, helmeted and armed, with a goat at his side ; this coin may belong to Areus, king of Sparta, 310- 266 B.C. The bronze money of Lacedaemon is plen- tiful, and extends over the whole period. The Spartans joined the Achaean League in 192 B.C. 80 THE COLLECTOR SERIES The coins of Argos, which cover the period from the sixth to the second century, are in the best time (fourth century) remarkable for their beauty of execu- tion and their mythological eloquence. The Stephanos on the head of Hera is taken to be a recollection of the head-dress on her statue by Polycleitus. Besides Argos itself, there were other coin-centres, particularly Cleonae, Epidaurus, and Tiryns, the last associated with the modern discoveries of Schliemann, and Epidaurus made interesting by the identification of its coinage with the statue by Thrasymedes of Paros of Asklepios, who was worshipped here. Of Tiryns there are coins of the fourth century, which refute the ordinary statement that it was not inhabited after its destruction in 468 B.C. The Roman currency of Argolis retains its Hellenic character. Of Arcadia we possess a federal coinage from the middle of the sixth to the latter part of the following century. The seats of mintage were probably more or less numerous. As elsewhere, some of the archaic money was doubtless struck within the sanctuary of Zeus on Mount Lycaeum on the occasion of the annual games (Lycsea), which brought the whole community or their representatives once a year thither; but other mints were Hersea in Western Arcadia, and, later on, Megalo- polis. The cults in vogue among the Arcadians were those of Zeus and Pan, of whom both had their shrines on Mount Lycaeum. Within this district lay several ancient and important townships or communities, in- cluding Hersea and Megalopolis above mentioned (the GREEK COINS 81 former rising into notice after the battle of Leuctra in 371), Mantineia, Orchomenos, and Stymphalos. Almost all these archaic centres are rich in mythological asso- ciations, and other coins are similarly valuable in rectifying historical views. Stymphalos was the fabu- lous land of the anthropophagous birds destroyed by Herakles. Hersea is represented as having been in primitive times a confederation of village communities. The bear appears on the early money of Mantineia, allusively to the legend of Kallisto ; that of Pheneus forms a long series, and the type of the feeding horse recalls the episode of Odysseus pasturing his mares in this country. Arcadia joined the Achaean League 243 B.C., and there are Eoman imperial coins with Greek reverse types. It is to be noted that the Arcadia and Pan of geography and mythology do not accord with the common poetical conception, for the climate of this part of Northern Greece was ill-suited to pastoral and al fresco life, while the Pan of popular belief and the Pan of song are two very different personages. Ckete. — The numismatic records of this island are replete with evidences of the ancient worship of Zeus, who was supposed to have been born on Mount Ida. Hera was worshipped at Cnossus and elsewhere in this locality. Another prominent cult was that of Europa, the mother by Zeus of Minos, and apparently the heroine of a myth of Phoenician origin. Crete was also the seat of the fable of Talos, the man of brass, who made the circuit of the island thrice daily, and hurled stones at vessels attempting to land, and of the dog F 82 THE COLLECTOR SERIES who guarded the youthful Zeus, both the work of Hephsestos. The coinage of Crete is chiefly of civic origin, and in silver and bronze ; it is of two standards — the iEginetic and the Attic, the latter proceeding from an alliance between the Cretans, Athenians, and others against Macedon about 200 B.C. The prin- cipal towns were Cnossus, Cydonia, G-ortyna (whose coins perpetuate the fable of Europa), Lyttus, Elyrus, Pha&stus, Phalasarna, Polyrhenium, Praesus, and Sybrita. Unusual obscurity hangs over the topographical and political history of this island, and it is possible that there may have been a monetary system anterior to any now identifiable. Gortyna seems to have been an im- portant mint in the fifth century, and a silver stater presents on reverse the almost unique feature conveyed in the words Topruvos to TrairjK. The famous Laby- rinth of Minos is a common reverse type on the coins of Cnossus, sometimes with the Minotaur's head in the centre, sometimes with the Minotaur occupying the obverse ; on those of Phsestus the Herakleian myth prevails. The bronze currency is abundant. There is a limited Koman imperial series. The islands of the ^Egaean Sea (Cyclades and Spo- rades), which, down to the second century B.C., consti- tuted part of the Ptolemaic kingdom of Egypt, offer many points of numismatic interest and instruction; they are Amorgos, Andros, Ios, Delos, Syros, Tenos, Ceos, Naxos, Paros, Siphnos, Melos, etc. Our know- ledge of the oldest remains is due to two finds at Thera (1821) and Melos, the former composed of nearly 800 GREEK COINS 83 coins, including some not of Cretan origin ; but these do not go very far to assist us in forming a complete view of the evidently enormous volume of money in silver and bronze which emanated from this group down to Eoman imperial days. The earliest of which we possess any exact knowledge belong to Paros, Naxos, Melos, and Ceos. The religious cults were manifold, and included those of Dionysos and Zeus, with whom we find at Ceos coupled a pastoral deity named Aristaeos, supposed to have been capable of protecting the herds- man in summer from the rays of the sun. At Amorgos there are evidences of the. worship of Asklepios, and at Anaphe of Apollo. There are numismatic proofs of occasional or partial federalism. ASIA Bosporus. — The two chief points of numismatic interest on the Asiatic side of the Cimmerian Bos- porus are Gorgippia and Phanagoria, of both of which there are limited and unimportant currencies in silver and bronze. There are also silver coins of Sinde of the fourth century B.c. It is supposed that the Koman imperial money of the time of Augustus, with the name of Agrippia Csesareia, is referable to Phana- goria, and that the latter was temporarily known under that name. We have likewise a series of dynasts of the Cimmerian Bosporus from the second century B.C. to the fourth A.D., with Greek coins exhibiting inscrip- 84 THE COLLECTOR SERIES tions, the latter bearing on one side the head of the king, and on the other that of a Roman emperor. Colchis (Mingrelia). — The only coinage seems to be pieces of the third or second century B.C., of base silver, with a bull's head, and bronze money of the first century B.C. of Dioscurias, with the emblem of the Dioscuri, the legendary founders of the place. A ruler named Aristarchus, only known by his coins, appears to have held sway in this district about 60 b.c. Pontus, a district containing two or three towns with interesting associations, and over which a dynasty of princes reigned from about 250 B.C. to a.d. 63, when Pontus became a Roman province. The kings of Pontus at one time held nearly the whole of Asia Minor, and their chief mint was at Pergamum. The principal cities were Amasia, birthplace of Mithridates the Great and Strabo the historian, of which we have autonomous and Roman money with Greek inscrip- tions, Amisus, Sebastopolis, Zela, and Comana Pontica, of all of which there are coins, some of ancient date, in silver and bronze. Pontus embraced within its boundaries many religious cults allied to those of the Greeks ; others, as of Men, Enyo, Anaitis, and Serapis, were peculiar to itself. The high-priest of the goddess Enyo at Comana enjoyed a precedence next to that of the king. The high-priest of Zela united the temporal with the sacerdotal authority. Gold staters exist of Mithridates VI., but of the other dynasts there are only tetradrachms and their divisions, and bronze GREEK COINS 85 money, many with good portraits, though of inferior style and workmanship. The history and chronology of these personages are often very obscure. Paphlagonia. — There are silver coins with Aramaic legends of certain satraps of this region, while it remained under Persian rule. But the central interest lies in one or two of the cities, namely, Amastria and Sinope. Of the former there are silver staters of Persic standard, with the deified head of Amastris the foundress, daughter of Darius Codomannus, in a Persian head-dress; but Sinope, an ancient city of Milesian origin, has a long numismatic history, having been an important Persian mint in the fourth century B.O., and continuing to strike money down to Roman times. A son of Nicomedes II. of Bithynia seems to have exercised sovereignty over Paphlagonia in the second century B.C. ; but the dynasty was deposed by the Romans, and Paphlagonia, with Pontus, added to that empire. Bithynia. — Except as a Roman province, there do not seem to be any coins of Bithynia in genere. Roman Bithynia comprehended that district or king- dom, Paphlagonia, and Pontus. There is a plentiful coinage of cistophori, etc., issued under imperial autho- rity or licence in the name of the kolvov or com- munity of Bithynia. But of the cities separately there are ancient autonomous coins from the sixth century B.C. belonging to Astacus, Chalcedon, Cius, and Hera- cleia. There are gold staters of Cius, only known from the Sidon find (1865). Some of the religious 86 THE COLLECTOR SERIES indications on the money of the Pontic region allude to the worship of Antinous, Apollo, and Demeter. The money of Chalcedon resembles that of Byzantium in the presence of the bull, which here has an ear of corn under his feet instead of a dolphin. The legal series extends from 278 to 74 B.C., and consists of six dynasts, so far as the evidence of coins goes. There are gold staters of Nicomedes II. Epiphanes, 149-91 b.c* Mysia. — In this division of Greece there are several interesting and important considerations to occupy the attention of the numismatist and collector. We can only glance at them. Mysia embraced the ancient and extremely prolific mints of Cyzicus and Lampsacus, and was the source of that immense volume of con- vention-money known under the name of cistophori, of which the Bacchic type appealed to the common religious sympathies of the population among which they were intended to pass current. The principal coin- centres were Apollonia on the Rhyndacus, Cyzicus, Parium, Lampsacus, and Pergamum. The electrum coinages of Cyzicus and Lampsacus are well known, and in the case of the former we have the advantage of the learned researches of Canon Greenwell. Per- gamum was a noted stronghold under Lysimachus, king of Thrace, and became in 283 B.C. the capital * In regard to these coins, it seems to be generally understood at present that there are no authentic original examples. But compare Head (Historia Numorum, 1887, p. 445), where they are said to have been actually struck under Nicomedes soon after his accession, and there is no reference to their suspicious, or more than suspicious, character. GREEK COINS 87 of a kingdom under Philetserus of Tium, who had been treasurer to Lysimachus. All the money of Pergamum exhibits the head of the founder of the dynasty except that of Eumnees II. The legal government lasted from 283 to 133 B.C., when it became the capital of the Eoman province of Asia. The bronze types, both of Pergamum and Cyzieus, under the Eoman rule, are varied and local, preserving the traditional symbols found on those of the prior epochs. The British Museum has lately acquired a fine and rare gold stater, presumed to have been struck at Pergamum about 310 b.c. by Herakles, son of Alexander the Great by Barsine, when that personage was asserting his claim to the Macedonian throne. It may be some proof of the confidence and esteem with which Barsine was regarded by Alexander that the latter committed to her the government of Pergamum. Teoas. — This locality included Abydos, a very in- fluential numismatic centre as far back as the sixth century B.C., and the place of origin of electrum staters, similar to those of Lampsacus, Miletus, etc., silver staters of the Persic standard and gold staters of the Euboic one, probably coined from the local mines mentioned by Xenophon. The bronze pieces range from the fifth to the first century B.C. There is a later silver coinage of autonomous character belonging to the period subsequent to the Eoman conquest, but of very inferior work. Other towns were Alexandria, Dardanos, Gergis, Larissa, Ilium, Thymbra, Scamandria, and Sigeium. The money of Dardanos sometimes 88 THE COLLECTOR SERIES shows two cocks fighting. That of Gergis transmits the legend of the Gergittian sibyl, who was said to have been born near there. The type of the feeding horse, which also occurs on coins of Neandria in the Troad and of Pheneus in Arcadia, may belong to this Larissa, although it has been assigned to Larissa in Thessaly. Thymbra, near Ilium, was so named by the founder, Dardanos, after his friend Thymbrseus. One of the Roman imperial reverse types of Scepsis exhibits the judgment of Paris on Mount Ida. The island of Tenedos, off Troas, was an ancient site and mint. The prevailing type is the Janiform head on obverse and the reverse with its double axe, both significant of reli- gious ideas or superstitions, and probably connected in meaning. ^Eolis. — We possess iEolian money of the third cen- tury B.o. and later, both federal and civic. The former, which reads Aiole, is assumed to have been struck for the common use of the towns, the chief of which were Mgas, Autocane (mentioned in the Homeric Hymn to Apollo, 1. 53), Cyme, Grynium, Elaea, and Myrina. The most important was Cyme. On the money of Gri- nium the head of Apollo, which also occurs on that of Myrina and other places, probably alludes to the statue of the god in white marble once visible there. There are iEolian coins of Roman imperial origin. Lesbos. — Within the confines of this island lay seve- ral cities, of which the chief was Mytilene. The most ancient coins are electrum staters, and later pieces in base silver of two different standards and of several fLiAlJi VI. GREEK COINS 89 types, of which we may mention two calves' heads or two boars' heads facing each other, a lion's, a calf's, or a boar's head, two human eyes, or one eye. Some of these subjects present themselves on the electrum coinage, which was the earliest. It appears that the convention-money for the common use of Lesbos and Phocsea was struck at Mytilene about 438 B.C. The only other place of consequence was Methymna. In the Hecatonnesi off Lesbos there were coinages in silver and bronze, which are allusive in their legends to Apollo Smintheus and Asklepios. Ionia. — This is, from our present point of view, a very wide field of inquiry, and at the same time, in regard to its earliest coinages, one where considerable obscurity still prevails. The most extensive and re- markable section in this case is the civic one. Clazo- mena3, Colophon, Ephesus, Erythrse, Magnesia, Miletus, Smyrna, Teos, are names familiar to all; the most ancient examples are uninscribed. Of Clazomenae a favourite early type or symbol is a winged boar, allusive to a legend of such a creature having once haunted the vicinity — an animal perhaps, to which its exceptional swiftness imparted the popular idea that it possessed wings. Some of the gold and silver coins of the fourth century B.C. are of the best style; and on a tetradrachm occurs the name of the artist Theodotos. The autonomous gold and silver do not come down lower than the fourth century; but there are, as at Colophon, gold staters and silver tetradrachms of Mace- donian type and of regal origin, and bronze coins down 90 THE COLLECTOR SERIES to Roman times. The famous Colophonian cavalry are denoted in the armed horseman which constitutes a reverse type on the coinage, as the head of Apollo, whose temple and oracle were in the vicinity, does on the obverse one. The money of Ephesus is divided into about eight classes, commencing with the electrum coins of the sixth century, and concluding with the Roman imperial series. The most singular feature of the primitive currency is the mystical type of the bee and the stag, symbols of the worship of the Nature-goddess, the high-priests of whose temple were called King Bees, and the priestesses Bees. The Roman money for Ephesus is plentiful, but of no great value or interest, except, perhaps, the pieces of religious significance, as that where the founder, Androclos, is slaying a wild boar, in allusion to the legend that he had been commanded by an oracle to build a city on the spot where he met such an animal. Of Magnesia the most noteworthy monument is the plated didrachm struck by Themistocles when he was banished from Athens and had this city assigned to him by the king of Persia (464-449 B.C.). The earliest coins of Miletus are associated with the oracle at Didymi of Apollo Didumseus, who was sym- bolised by the lion and the sun ; and it may well be that they were struck within the temple, and continued so to be till the fourth century B.C., by the priests in charge. There are gold staters and silver pieces of the second century B.C., and bronze coins of analogous types. To the Roman period (Augustus to Salonina) GREEK COINS 91 we have to assign a coin in the inferior metal of parti- cular interest, as the obverse contains a copy of the statue of Apollo Didumaeus by Canachus. The gold staters are rare. Phoc^ea began, from its position on the Mediterranean as a maritime port, to avail itself of the earliest oppor- tunity of possessing a coinage, which is referable to the seventh century B.C. and commences with electrum staters and their divisions, followed or accompanied by silver money of similar patterns, and succeeded by elec- trum hectce ; besides which there are staters of electrum struck at Mytilene and elsewhere in alliance with Phocaea, of the earlier or original class. More than one writer refers to staters of Phocaea as concurrent with the smaller pieces, but no examples of contem- porary origin are known. The Phocaean bronze is common, and extends over a lengthened period. The money of Phygela seems to refer to the cult of Arte- mis Munychia, and that of Priene to that of Poseidon and Athena. The hippocamp held by the former on coins is common to the statue of the god mentioned by Eratosthenes, and presumably then at Priene. Of Smyrna we have nothing, owing to political circum- stances, prior to the rebuilding of the city, when tetra- drachms appeared with the turreted head of Kybele, who occurs as an obverse type on the unique gold stater in the French national collection. The autonomous and Eoman imperial bronze is abundant, and presents numerous interesting inscriptions and types, including that of Homer seated, which conferred on these pieces 92 THE COLLECTOR SERIES the name of Homereia. The griffin on the coins of Teos is figurative of the Dionysiac cult ; the temple of the god at Teos was considered one of the finest specimens of Ionic architecture in Greece. A Phocaic gold stater bearing a griffin's head, and the reading Teon, has been ascribed to this place, and there are some small electrum pieces with the rare symbol which may belong here. There is an important series of archaic silver money, sixth to fourth century B.C., and bronze and Roman imperial brass of Dionysiac types; in one Anacreon appears seated, playing on a lyre. There is also a short-lived satrapal currency in the fourth century, while Ionia and the neighbouring states were once more under Persian rule. These coins are of Persian type and in silver. The exact circumstances connected with their origin and legends do not seem to be known. Of the Ionian group of islands, the only members which have transmitted numismatic records are Samos, Icaria, and Chios. The archaic Samian coinage, which probably attained the height of its importance under Polycrates (532-522 B.C.), consisted of electrum staters and their fractions; these were followed, while the island was in alliance with Athens, by silver money ; and we find that the island successively, as it obeyed political exigencies, employed Athenian, federal, and Roman imperial types, becoming part of the Roman province of Asia. On some of the later coins we meet with a head of Hera on obverse, and on reverse the prow of a Samian galley, on which stands a peacock, GREEK COINS symbolical of the goddess. The Koman series preserves the Greek myths, and not merely those immediately appertaining to Samos, but to the legendary history of its Ionian neighbours. Caria. — The most conspicuous points were Cnidus (the seat of the worship of the Triopian Apollo and of Aphrodite), Cheronesus, and Halicarnassus, the re- puted birthplace of Herodotus. Apollo is symbolised on the money by a lion (as elsewhere), and Aphrodite by a bull or the prow of a galley. The coins go back to the sixth century B.c. We may also mention Astyra, opposite Rhodes, an early seat of coinage. The regal series, including that of the celebrated Mausolus, extends from about 391 to about 333 B.C. only. Halicarnassus was the capital, and this city on its currency perpetuated the cult of Zeus. The Roman imperial money for the different centres is considerable both in volume and interest ; it still embodied in its types the local reli- gious sentiments of the people. We would call atten- tion to an unique electrum stater of Halicarnassus of archaic fabric, described by Dr Head. In connection with Caria are the more or less adjacent islands, and foremost Rhodes, of which there is an abundant coinage in all metals, chiefly conforming to the Rhodian stan- dard, and commencing in the fifth century B.C. It comes down to Roman times, and includes some of Macedonian and Thracian regal types. The fine head of Helios on many of the obverses was copied from the colossal statue of Apollo by Chares of Iindus. Lydia. — The most ancient coined money of Greek 94 THE COLLECTOR SERIES type and character was of Asiatic origin, and we have to cross over into another continent in search of the germs of the archaic gold currency of Bceotia and the Hellespont. In the seventh century B.C. it is tradi- tionally believed that Gyges, king of Lydia, founder of the dynasty of the Mermnadse, first struck at Sardis electrum staters and their divisions on the Babylonic and Phoenician standards for respective use in different parts of his dominions. The stater of the former weight (about 167 gr.) constitutes, perhaps, the earliest pre- cedent for the usage of adapting a coinage to the region or object for which it was designed, as this light piece is supposed to have been limited in its circulation to the interior, while the Phoenician (about 220 gr.) was reserved for commercial purposes, where the other would not have been acceptable. The electrum coinage was superseded after the Persian conquest by the gold daric, and the latter by the cistophori, struck by the Romans here and elsewhere upon their formation of the province of Asia, in the second century B.C. We pos- sess, of later times, imperial and alliance coins (cisto- phori) only, with a few exceptions, where cities such as Sardis and Philadelphia continued to issue autonomous bronze money, doubtless under Roman sanction, and generally inscribed with magistrates' names. Phrygia. — The coinage is largely of Roman imperial origin, but merits attention and study from its interest- ing elucidations of geography and mythology. Pro- bably the most curious type is that of Apameia, with the ark or chest exhibiting two inmates, and inscribed GREEK COINS 95 Noe, a too literal graft of the early Christian element in the locality on Paganism. The only trace of monar- chical government seems to be at Cibyra, which with three other towns was for some time under the sway of reguli or tyrants. The preponderance of the money of Phrygia is Eoman brass, of which the reverse types illustrate local cults, as those of Zeus, Aphrodite, etc. Lycia. — Federalism, of which we find two distinct eras, was the prevailing feature which here governed the char- acter of the money ; the favourite symbol is the famous triquetra or three-legged emblem, occasionally varied so as to form a diskelis or tetraskelis ; but boars, winged lions, griffins, and bulls likewise occur. The presence of the triskelis, emblematical of the solar revolutions, on the group of monuments belonging to this region, seems to set at rest the theory as to its original applica- tion to Sicily. The reader may be usefully referred to Sir Charles Fellows' " Coins of Ancient Lycia," and to a paper in the Revue Numismatique for 1886 by M. Six. There are coins of the fifth century B.C. ; some of those of later date bear legends in the Lycian character. The series comes down to Koman imperial times. There are here, as in Phrygia, very remarkable types significant of ancient beliefs, and a particularly striking one, a coin of Myra, engraved by Head. Pamphylia contained within its boundaries several noteworthy and ancient seats of coinage, of which we may specify Aspendus, where we get the Slinger(Asphen- detis) and triskelis types, Attalia, Antiochia, and Side. There are regal types arising from the formation of the 96 THE COLLECTOR SERIES province with other territory into the kingdom of Galatia, 36 B.c, and Roman imperial coins (Augustus to Salo- nina), as well as alliance money and tetradrachms, countermarked with a bow and bow-case and m.m., to pass current for the same value as cistophori. Pisidia lay to the north of Pamphylia and Lycia, and was a very mountainous country. With the excep- tion of Selge, which struck autonomous coins of the triskelis, wrestlers, and Slinger types in the 4th-3rd centuries B.C., the money of Pisidia is chiefly unimpor- tant or Roman imperial. Pisidia successively formed part of the kingdoms of Pergamum and Galatia. Lycaonia, to the east of Pisidia, possesses a some- what feeble numismatic interest. Its few autonomous coins are bronze of late date ; but we discern traces of the worships of Zeus, Pallas, Herakles, and Hermes ; and it was at Lystra that the inhabitants saluted Bar- nabas and Paul as Zeus and Hermes. Cilicia, divided into Eastern and Western, in the former of which the Greek, and in the latter the Ara- maic language was that of the country, possessed a coinage in the fifth century B.C., with legends which are often bilingual. The ancient mints were Tarsus (of such peculiar Scriptural celebrity), Mallus, and Celenderis; but others were afterward added. Some of the money of the fourth century discloses a strong Persian influence, proceeding from the occupation of the ports by Persian satraps for strategical purposes. The coinage goes back to the sixth century B.C., of which epoch there are electrum staters of Tarsus of great GREEK COINS 97 rarity, and comes down to Eoman times. Under the Seleucid kings Tarsus was a leading mint. Cypkus. — The rich and large series belonging to this island dates from the sixth century B.C. Much has been done to identify and arrange it, but it forms a subject over which, both from historical and philological difficulties, a great deal of uncertainty and obscurity yet hangs ; and the task of classification is aggravated by the normally poor condition and careless execution of specimens. The coinage may be divided into civic, dynastic (proceeding from reguli), regal (under the Ptolemies), and Eoman imperial. There are many beautiful and characteristic productions, and nearly all are curious and valuable as evidences of the existence of rulers, sites, or legendary faiths. Of the kings of Salamis (4th-3rd century B.C.) the sequence is unusually complete. Cyprus was under Ptolemy Soter and his successors an Egyptian mint, and later on a Eoman one. Galatia was erected into a kingdom, as above noted, late in the first century B.C. There is a very short regal series and a Eoman imperial one, besides autonomous civic money of Germa, Pessinus, Tavium, etc., from which conclusions may be drawn as to the long survival of cults relating to Zeus, Aphrodite, Dionysos, Askle- pios, Men, etc. Cappadocia was, in addition to its municipal or urban currencies, the seat of two regal dynasties (380 B.c- a.d. 17), both of which struck money in silver and bronze; but perhaps the more interesting coins are those of the cities and of the Eoman period, when Cap- G 98 THE COLLECTOR SERIES padocia was a procuratorship. The prevailing religious idea presented on them is the snow-capped and deified Mount Argseus, rising to an altitude of 13,000 feet above the sea. Armenia is not known to have struck any coins prior to the second century B.C., when two of its nobles, revolting from Syria, divided the territory between them, distinguishing the two portions as the Lesser and the Greater Armenia. There are coins of these dynasts down to A.D. 35, when the country was under Roman protection, as we infer from a denarius on which Ger- manicus is represented crowning the last king, Artaxias. Syria is one of the most important of the ancient divisions of Asia from a numismatic point of view, as we enjoy an uninterrupted succession of the Seleucidan coins from the fourth to the first century B.C., when Syria was incorporated with Armenia under Tigranes (83-69 B.C.). The portraits of the Seleucidae offer unusual individuality of character, and among them occurs that of Cleopatra, mother of Seleucus V., and consort of Antiochus VIII. The head of Tigranes has an Ar- menian tiara ; his coins exhibit barbarous reverses, and he is described on many of them in the Oriental fashion as King of Kings. Besides the money of the Seleucid kings, we have that of those of Commagene and Chalci- dene ; of the cities, including Palmyra, Seleucis, Antioch, etc.; of Ccele-Syria, where Damascus is the leading centre ; of Decapolis, and of Phoenicia, in the last of which there were the important towns or cities of Aradus, Berytus, Marathus, Sidon, Tripolis, and Tyre ; GREEK COINS 99 of Samaria and Judaea. The whole of this extensive region was a very productive source of Greek and other types, of which the shekel and its divisions with Samari- tan inscriptions must not be overlooked. The coins are not, on the whole, so difficult to procure as was often formerly the case ; successive finds have rendered acces- sible many which were once almost unknown, including the half -shekels struck over Eoman denarii. The oldest coins of Phoenicia appear to be those of Sidon and Tyre, both names suggestive of commercial prosperity and associated with the Hebrew Scriptures. From A.D. 6 Judsea had been a Eoman procuratorial government subordinate to the praefects of Syria. It was in the eighteenth year of the Emperor Tiberius, when Valerius Gratus and Pontius Pilatus held this office, that Jesus Christ is said to have been crucified at Jerusalem. A full account of Syria and the countries contiguous to it, including the Holy Land, is to be found in the Historia Nwmorum and the authorities there cited. Arabia. — Leaving the ground consecrated by its more or less intimate associations with Christ and Christianity, and with the Apostles, we pass into Arabia, where we have the two numismatic divisions of Arabia Petrsea and Arabia Felix, with some unim- portant regal coins of ephemeral and obscure dynasts ; a series of the currencies of the Himyarite line of kings, which governed a large territory in Arabia Felix during many centuries, and copied Greek and Eoman models; and, lastly, the Eoman imperial money, of 100 THE COLLECTOR SERIES which some of the types are interesting and historically instructive. In Mesopotamia, where we again approach Scriptural scenes, and the reputed cradle of the human race, Babylonia, and Assyria, coins were struck by the cities, by the Syrian Seleucidae, by native reguli, and by the Romans. Among the more important centres were Edessa, Carrhse, and Seleucia on the Tigris, the second - named famous for its worship of the Moon. The reverse types of the Roman epoch are often of mytho- logical interest. Parthia. — This, like other States (comp. Bactria infra), erected out of larger and well-established govern- ments, not only at once produced a well-executed coinage under the first of the Arsacidse, circa 250 B.C., but that of the succeeding kings suffered a progressive declension in fabric and style, till toward the end of the series the inscriptions and types become equally barbarous and illegible. Nevertheless, in this branch of the inquiry (249 B.C. to A.D. 227) we have, down to a certain point, many productions interesting from their costume and from the presence of dates. The titles are curious, and are servilely borrowed from those found on the Greek money. The most intelligible is that of Philellen, adopted to propitiate the Greek element in the Parthian dominions. It is said that Seleucus II. of Syria (246-226 B.C.) borrowed the fashion of wearing a beard, to which he owed the sobriquet of Pogon, from having resided in Parthia, whose kings are generally represented bearded. GREEK COINS 101 Persis (capital, Persepolis) enjoyed a brief interval of regal autonomy in the third century B.C., and to this circumstance, due to the temporary weakness of the Seleucid dynasty in Syria, we owe certain tetradrachms and gold staters of Athenian and Macedonian patterns, but of barbarous work and with indistinct legends. One of the silver types exhibits a king worshipping before a fire-altar. The coins of the Sassanidae, which extend from the third to the seventh century A.D., and represent the product of thirty reigns, and those of Characene in Susiana, constitute other departments of the Greek school of work; to which, as being almost outside the strict lines, it is impossible to do more than refer in the present case ; and the same is predicable of the Persian series of gold darics and silver sigloi ; the main Hellenic feature of interest about the former being that about 331 B.C. Alexander the Great is sup- posed to have first struck the double darics, of which specimens, once extremely rare, are now more or less readily procurable. The ordinary coin is remembered by the anecdote of Agesilaus and the thirty thousand archers, who had driven him out of Athens — allusively to the figure on the coin. Bactria and Northern India. — The line of succes- sion of the Princes of this region, and the extent and distribution of their authority, are still unsettled and incomplete, although the rich fruit of excavations in Afghanistan and the Punjaub has placed our know- ledge of the coinage on an entirely new footing. The series is at present known to have extended from about 102 THE COLLECTOR SERIES 250 B.C. to about a.d. 250, and to embrace about thirty reigns. It commences with Diodotos, who made him- self independent of Syria, and of whom we have staters and tetradrachms, as well as copper or bronze money, of good work. His successors produced some fine examples of portraiture down to Menander, but not uninterruptedly, as many of the intervening rulers show coins of inferior execution, and in nearly all the reverse types are unequal to the obverse. The inscriptions are often bilingual, and the fabric of the tetradrachms is usually widespread ; among the smaller denominations there are pieces of square form. The mythology is partly Greek and partly Indian. We allude elsewhere to the unique 20-stater piece of Eukratides,* to the unique tetradrachm of Plato, king of Bactria, and to another with the busts of Eukratides, Heliocles, and Laodice. The tetradrachms of Heliocles vary in their style, owing, no doubt, to the mint or circumstances. The copper or bronze series is most difficult to obtain in desirable state. AFRICA JRgyvt, like Bactria, Parthia, and so many other States which acquired independence between the middle of the fourth and that of the third century B.C., was a kingdom originally founded by Ptolemy, one of the gene- * Of this and of many similar rarities, no less than of others, which are not particularly uncommon, there are excellent casts, against which collectors should be on their guard. GREEK COINS 103 rals of Alexander the Great, and to this source we are indebted for a lengthened, rich, and varied series of coins in all metals down to Koman imperial times. The money of the Ptolemies themselves, more particu- larly the earlier princes of the line with their consorts, rank first in point of importance and attraction. We may specify the gold octadrachms and tetradrachms of Ptolemy III., and the gold octadrachms of Berenice II., and Arsinoe. But the coins of the cities, especially of Alexandria and of the Nomes of Egypt, offer an inex- haustible variety of types, of historical, mythological, and astronomical significance, which can only be treated in a monograph. In the precious Alexandrian series there is no limit to the diversity and utility. Akerman long since pointed out two matters of detail which we here reproduce ; the custom of noting the date by the letter L preceding the word one or other number, whence comes to us the information, for instance, that the visit of Hadrian to this city took place in the fif- teenth year of his reign; and again, the type of Isis Faria, or Pharia, holding a sail, which, if stretched out- ward, indicated vows offered up for a safe voyage, and if inward, for a safe return. There is also the large brass series belonging here, and rarely found in good state, with reverses significant of local faiths and cults. Ethiopia possessed kings or other rulers who struck money with Greek or Grseco- Coptic inscriptions as far back as the fourth century B.C. ; but very little is known of one or the other. There were early commercial rela- 104 THE COLLECTOR SERIES tions between Egypt and the modern Abyssinia, which rendered some currency essential; and, as elsewhere, the types were copies of Greek money by engravers unacquainted with that language ; the later pieces bear Ethiopian legends. The metals appear to have been gold and bronze, both of small module. Cykene and its colony, Barce, equally go back, numismatically and politically speaking, to the sixth century B.C. The former, itself a Dorian settlement, has left us a wealthy assortment of most interesting regal and other coins in electrum, silver, gold, and bronze. The electrum was the earliest metal employed, if the attribution to Cyrene be correct ; but there were also archaic gold pieces, as indicated by Babelon and other authorities. A prevailing type on the most ancient silver money is the silphium plant, its leaf, bud, or seed. Certain tetradrachms of thick fabric are thought to have been struck by Arcesilaus III. in 530 B.C. to pay his Samian and Ehodian auxiliaries, when he regained power with the aid of Polycrates, tyrant of Samos. In 247 B.C. Berenice, daughter of Magas of Cyrene, brought that country in dower to Ptolemy III. of Egypt. There are later Roman coins. But the first period was during the republican era, B.C. 431-321, to which we have to refer all the gold and silver pieces of the best workmanship and of Greek style. At Barce we also find the silphium type, and money in gold, silver, and bronze. The money is scarce and valuable, which may partly proceed from the decline of the place after the rise of its port Ptolemais under GREEK COINS 105 the Egyptian kings. The three remaining town- ships in Cyrenaica also issued coins. There is a tetradrachm of Euesperides at Turin, said to be unique. The coinages of Libya, Byzacene, and Syrtica or Tripolitana (from its three cities) are of late date, and principally of bronze; Leptis Magna, colonised from Sidon, was the most important place, and struck money in silver and bronze in the first century B.C., with Dionysiac and Herakleian types. It has been thought that the primitive inhabitants of the Canary Islands, which had their own chieftains, were emigrants from Libya, and they must have had a currency, as their rule extended over hundreds of years prior to the Spanish conquest. Zeugitana included Utica, Hippo, and above all Carthage, of which the coinage betrays a powerful Sicilian influence; the best period was from the fifth to the fourth century B.C. (410-240). There is money in gold, electrum, silver, and bronze. The silver tetradrachm, bearing the deified head of Dido, may be mentioned ; it seems to have supplied a model to some of the modern engravers for a personification of Liberty. The large silver pieces of later date with the head of Persephone are of coarse work. The authorities classify the currencies connected with this illustrious city as follow: — Siculo-Punic coins (410-310); coins struck at Carthage (340-146) ; Carthaginian coins struck in Spain ; those struck under the Romans subsequently to the rebuilding by Julius Csesar in 44 B.C., to which may be appended the coins emanating from the islands 106 THE COLLECTOR SERIES between Africa and Sicily in the second and first centuries B.C. Dr Head has pointed out that the similarity of the Capuan coins to those of Carthage may have proceeded from the fact that, while Hannibal was wintering in the former city, 216-215 B.C., money familiar to his troops was struck on the spot. There is comparatively little Hellenic element or interest in the numismatic systems of Numidia and Mauretania, of which two regions we possess regal and urban series belonging to the first century B.C., and, in fact, of the former kingdom the fabric and weight are rather Roman than Greek. Of Juba I. of Numidia, Cicero speaks as a young man bene capil- latus, and another Roman writer relates how Caesar on one occasion took him by the beard. Of Mauretania the regal list is incomplete, and we do not know whether Bogud III., who flourished about 50-30 B.C., is the King Bocchus who engaged in medical and philosophical pursuits, and confounded the learned men of his court by drinking poison with impunity in the name of the Trinity, and by the wonderful things which he collected from the Book of Noah, according to the terms of an early English work (said to be translated from the French), printed at London about 1530.* To Iol in this country are ascribed the second brass Roman coins, bearing a portrait of Julia, only child of Augustus. * 4t The History of Kyng Bocchus and Sydracke," by Hugo de Caumpeden, translated into English, 4to. KOME When we enter upon the consideration of the Koman coinage, we of course find ourselves occupying very interesting ground, yet we cannot fail to be aware of the change which has occurred in the atmosphere sur- rounding the new branch of our inquiry. The Komans as the next and yet more westerly centre of civilisation and power, had owed much to their precursors before they acquired the opportunity of politically supplant- ing them; the brass cbs, in its primitive amplitude, was characteristic of rude Pelasgian grandeur, for this heavy currency or medium, which supplied a prototype of the phenomenal Swedish dalers of the eighteenth century, was common to the cities of Southern Italy, which the new empire necessarily absorbed, and was in fact adopted, rather than initiated, by Eome. We have already seen that in Lydia the archaic money was of gold, for the apparent reason that that region pos- sessed mines of that ore ; and in the same way in Italy, copper being abundant, and the primitive inhabitants having been instructed in the art of smelting it and hardening it by an alloy of tin, we find what was termed ces, or bronze, in use throughout the southern 107 108 THE COLLECTOR SERIES part of the peninsula centuries before any gold or even silver coinage was introduced. Again, the Consular series of denarii, quinarii, aurei, no less than the so- called Romano-Campanian gold (twenty, forty, and sixty sestertii), are for the most part of Hellenic fabric and represent the best and purest period of Italian numismatic art prior to the Renaissance. In the Roman imperial series the two leading features and attractions are the portraits of the emperors and empresses, and other august personages, and the reverses significant of historical events, for which they are sometimes the sole existing evidence. The execution of the likenesses, from the Augustan era down to the fall of the Western Empire, is artistic yet lifelike ; the series of empresses and other Augusta is a most interesting gallery for the costume and head-dress as well as the features ; and we turn with curiosity to many an obscure name in the later portion of the annals for the lineaments of a man whose reign was reckoned by weeks or days, but whose earliest care was to stamp his e&igy on the money. Rome was originally, and through the entire period of prosperity remained, the official and political centre from which all acts of government took their initiative. As Paris is said to be France, and as London is really the United Kingdom, so Rome was the Roman empire, till a combination of agencies led to its disruption. The coinage of the Romans for their Greek colonies and Asiatic and African dependencies resembled in its fabric and complexion that for internal use, and if it was not struck at home, as was the case with the ROME 109 extensive colonial series of Venice later on, we may presume that it was the work of Italian moneyers, or at least from dies approved by the representative of imperial authority. Thus it will be understood that Greece and Eome are in an equal measure generic terms applicable at the respective dates of highest prosperity to vast territories extending over three continents, and embracing popu- lations, infinitely diversified in their climatic conditions, their language, their customs, and the nature of their allegiance. But the comparison fails altogether when we begin to consider that • these two great empires obeyed diametrically opposite laws of political exist- ence, and that while Hellas in ancient times never possessed a central government, but passed through the stages of separate republics, federalism, and a mixed system of democracy and autocracy, fluctuating agree- ably to current circumstances and the successive rise of men capable of shifting the balance of power, Eome remained, on the contrary, during several centuries, the metropolis of the then known world, round which all the states and princes subject to her jurisdiction re- volved. Not even excepting, perhaps, the older Asiatic monarchies, the Eomans set the earliest example of centralised government, as it is now conducted in Europe with very few and immaterial exceptions. The Eomans were a connecting link between the poli- tical life of the past and of the present. Some account will be found in the authorities of the archaic method of computation by weight for pur- 110 THE COLLECTOR SERIES poses of barter and exchange through the medium of a bronze or brass coinage, of which the unit was at first a square or oblong cast ingot of twelve ounces (ces libralis), and its multiple, stamped with the head of Janus or Minerva, a bull, a sheep, a sow, a fowl, or two fowls feeding, or a shell ; from some of which emblems we may perhaps infer that the word pecunia is a deriva- tive from pecus. But the presence of these symbols in some cases was not merely literal, and is capable of an explanation on historical or religious grounds, as, for instance, the sow and the two fowls, of which the latter may be referable to the sacred birds kept for augury, and the former to the veneration of the ancient Romans for an animal which ^Eneas was said to have seen bringing forth thirty young on the site where the city was subsequently built, the number surviving in the thirty curice, and by its multiple in the three hundred gentes* The heaviest and most ancient ingot which appears to have come down to us was formerly in the Pembroke collection, and weighed 4 lbs. 9 oz. 11 dwts. 38 grains. It is probably a quincussis; it bears the figure of an ox. It is not necessary to assume that the decussis, or double, mentioned by Akerman as having on obverse Minerva in a biga, and on reverse the prow of a galley, belonged to the same period, as its type shows it to have been of much later date. While the ces maintained its original standard, it seems to have served not only as a medium of currency, but as a basis of fiscal assessment and social distribution in regal Rome, * See Stevenson's " Dictionary of Roman Coins," 1889, v. Sus. ROME 111 where the five classes of Servius Tullius were required to possess a graduated property qualification from 20,000 to 2000 pounds of bronze. The square ccs was succes- sively reduced from twelve ounces to nine ounces or nine and a half ounces, and the circular form to four ounces, two ounces, one ounce, and half an ounce, when it became an actual coin ; and it is to be supposed that Macrobius the grammarian, who lived in the fourth or fifth century of our era, alludes to the modified piece when he speaks of the Roman youths tossing up the money and crying capita aut navia ? — like our " heads or tails" — in reference to the head and the prow of a galley on either side. In the Roman Consular series the highly picturesque types form a valuable adjunct to classical mythology, as the coins on their reverses generally present an allusion to some familiar legend associated with the prehistoric or primitive annals of the republic. The earliest silver coinage took place about A.U.C. 485, and the types chosen were Greek in their feeling and taste : a figure driving a chariot, a galeated head of Rome, a Janiform head, all with the word Roma, at first in indented letters. These pieces were denarii = the ancient decussis or two osra, and they were followed by the quinarii and victo- riati — respectively to a half and two-thirds of the larger denomination. It is extremely probable that the as, in its final nodule under the Papirian law, remained current long after the introduction of a higher metal, in emula- tion of the Greek system in Southern Italy, and that the denarius and its divisions merely superseded the 112 THE COLLECTOR SERIES multiples of the brass or bronze, no longer found neces- sary or convenient, except that in the more remote parts of the amplified Roman territory, and still more among the ruder population of the adjoining Italian states or cities, we can well believe that the old-fashioned system lingered for a considerable time. The coinage of bronze of reduced standard survived the principle on which the Roman gentes or families struck money with their names and with types indica- tive of legendary or actual incidents connected with them, and these only gave way to the silver series of denarii and their parts by degrees. The denarius under the republic was adjusted to the weight of the Greek drachma, which must have long been a familiar coin at Rome, and have been accepted in commercial payments in default of a national silver currency ; and the spirit of the bronze money was maintained in rendering the new medium in equal measure a vehicle for embodying and perpetuating traditions of the past and actual events of the time, while the Romans, among the fruits of their victories and conquests in Greece, adapted the types on the new metal, of which they thus acquired an abundance, to those of their Hellenic subjects or de- pendents in workmanship and style. The transition from the ces system to that of the denarius — from a bronze to a silver standard — was gradual but complete, and during most part of the republican period we find only silver and gold employed, the latter very sparingly. It is supposed that the original denarii, struck in the third century B.C., are those with the head of Pallas or ROME 113 Koma, with the numeral X for the value, and on the reverse the Dioscuri with Roma in the exergue. The association of Castor and Pollux with the legendary annals of Kome may be familiar to those who have read Macaulay's "Lay of the Battle of the Lake Kegillus." The dendrites had been in circulation some length of time before the quinarius or half was added, and the sestertius or sesquitertius or quarter was probably a still later institution. The silver republican money of Eome is plentiful enough to this day, and with its beautiful and fascinat- ing types, so diversified, so chaste, so eloquent, lies within the reach of any one at the most moderate prices in pristine condition, if we accept certain families, which happen to be rare, and the gold, which is always costly. Nor should it be forgotten that pieces belonging to the most ancient mintage are of the greatest rarity, having been presumably struck in smaller numbers. The original simplicity of the design was naturally lost in the more elaborate details, which found room on obverse and reverse in course of time, including the name of the gens or the individual and that of the moneyer. The art is throughout Greek, and if there is any fault in the execution it generally lies in the reverses, where the nude human figure is portrayed. There cannot be a more charming series for a collector who does not desire heavy expenditure, and does not insist on completeness ; and the victoriati and their divisions and multiples, which were posterior in their appearance by nearly a century, constitute appro- H 114 THE COLLECTOR SERIES priate adjuncts to the denarius group, where we may read a history in little of the period over which it extended. The first essays in the direction of striking gold and higher values in silver seem to have been equally due to the exigencies of war, and to have been temporary experiments independent of the normal coinage. We allude, of course, to the scripulum of 20 sesterces and its multiples of 40 and 60 in the most precious metal, with the head of Mars struck during the campaign with Hannibal, at Capua or elsewhere, in or about 206 B.C., of which some of the examples are of finer work, and to the tridrachm in silver, and the pieces of 52 and 105 sesterces in gold, which form the earliest convention-money of Rome, and refer to the treaty between the republic and Capua for the subjugation of Southern Italy ; the reverses of the latter coins exhibit two parties swearing an oath over a sow, an Italian usage of the highest antiquity. A similar type belongs to the denarii and other money issued in Italy in the name of the Anti-Roman League during the Social War in 91 B.C., where eight warriors are represented per- forming the same rite ; and Livy furnishes the alleged text of the adjuration. A very copious account of the Roman family series is to be found in Humphreys, Akerman, and Stevenson. The portraiture has a twofold interest in supplying us not only with contemporary, but with posthumous like- nesses of illustrious Romans. We obtain through this medium the best busts of such men as Caesar, the Pompeys, and Mark Antony, and the earliest one of ROME 115 Augustus ; and down to the last days of the republic the Janiform head was occasionally employed. Where mythological subjects occur, as they so often do, we perceive without difficulty the strong Greek influence on the sentiment as well as on the style. Numismatists have gradually accomplished much to elucidate the import of the subjects and symbols represented; the coining implements and machinery, with the helmet of Vulcan above, on a denarius of the Carisia gens, are curious as showing us the fittings, as it were, of a Eoman mint. We shall see later on that the Komans long preserved their taste for writing their history on these imperishable monuments. To the last years of the Roman commonwealth apper- tain those exceptionally attractive silver and gold pieces with the heads of Caesar, Mark Antony, Octavianus or Augustus, Brutus, and Lepidus with symbolical acces- sories on the reverse and of various types; and the Janiform one survived in its occasional employment, as in pieces with busts of the Pompey and Cinna families, down to the commencement of the empire, but no longer of a fixed or statutory weight. The Cinna coin is of superior style. Some of the coins of Caesar and others above mentioned are without portraits; but there is the denarius bearing the effigy of Caesar himself as Pontifex Maximus and Perpetual Dictator, and a gold solidus of similar character, of which one variety is of much finer work than the other. The coinage of the triumvirate formed after his death is also highly interesting, and exists in several modifications; but 116 THE COLLECTOR SERIES probably the most fascinating series is that struck by Mark Antony, either with his head alone, wearing a radiated crown or an Armenian tiara, or with the jugate heads of Cleopatra and himself, particularly the silver tetradrachm from the mint at Alexandria about 33 B.C., where the Egyptian princess is figured as the New Isis. With the democratic form of government the old monetary system gave way to a new and more elaborate one in the three metals; and the Roman imperial coinage affords the first example of one where gold, silver, and copper or bronze appear to have been during the best period struck, proportionately speaking, in equal abundance, unless we have to except Egypt under the Ptolemies. There is as complete a revolution in the numismatic as in the political state of affairs. The ancient system was superseded by a new principle, under which the unit was the ces yet further reduced in weight, the dupondius, and the sestertius, or, as we usually say, first, second, and third brass, with the denarius in silver = 10 sestertii, and the aureus or solidus = in weight to 2 and in value to 20 denarii; yet a good deal of caution and patience was displayed by Augustus before he rendered his personality and auto- cracy too prominent on the currency ; and one point is conspicuous, namely, that although the coinage forms three divisions, that of the lowest metal in the first size, which had been identified with the primitive epoch, was under the empire the only one of which the issue was subject to the authority of the Senate, and that on which, partly owing to its diametrical capacity, we meet ROME 117 with the most interesting recollections most carefully treated, and the finest portraits of the Caesars and their august kindred and consorts. Moreover, certain reigns, such as those of Hadrian and Antoninus Pius, present us with large bronze medallions and smaller pieces of silver rich in archaeological interest, and in testimony to the respect still cherished for the traditions of the mythical epoch or for the Greek cults which the joint influence of trade and conquest had made familiar to the Komans. This fine and valuable series in the two metals exists of the emperors from Augustus to the Antonines, but specimens are rare. The first brass struck at Alexandria with various mythological reverses, chiefly of local or at least Asiatic origin, under some of the later Caesars, may be classed under the same head; these are not uncommon, except in high preservation. As in the Consular coinage, there are many exceptions to the prevailing rule in regard to the scarcity of the imperial money in the respective metals. The bulk of it is remarkably common, especially in second and third brass ; but the first brass of many reigns, and of those out of the direct line of succession, such as Marciana and Matidia, is difficult to procure; and patination is imperative. The gold and silver of the earlier Caesars is mostly plentiful, but the later and briefer reigns offer frequent difficulties to the collector who aims at being complete. The work alike in both metals is very unequal, and even on the same coin the obverse is superior to the reverse, the artist who engraved the 118 THE COLLECTOR SERIES portrait proving less successful in the symbol or allegory on the other side. As we have noted under Greece, the objects on the reverse often doubtless represent copies of actual works of art existing at Rome when they first appeared, like the figure of Hope on the first brass of Claudius, which is found represented on some of the subsequent money in inferior style. When we come to the later reigns, we find the execution of the secondary details more and more careless. As we pass from the Roman to the Byzantine group, we become sensible of a transition to a spirit and style half Greek and half Oriental, and except that no collection can pretend to be even representative without specimens of the numismatic productions of the Lower Empire, there is very slight importance beyond the occasional illustra- tion of contemporary costume in the long succession from the fourth century B.C. to the thirteenth century of our own era. Of the Emperor Otho there is no Roman brass, and the gold is scarce. In the third brass, and in the size intermediate between that and the second, there are not a few rarities, but, as a general rule, not a year elapses without swelling the already vast and over- whelming volume of these pieces, which appear to have been buried in large numbers in nearly all parts of the ancient world. Intrinsically they possess the highest value, and are for the most part carefully executed. Those of Constantine the Great, from a variety of mints (London included), are particularly abundant and diversified, and there are several types ROME 119 of his mother Helena, who is remembered as the dis- coverer of the true Cross. The coins relating to Britain, among which those of Constantine are to be included, embrace the pieces struck at Rome to commemorate the triumphs of the imperial arms over the barbarous islanders, which com- mence with the reign of Claudius, the series in all metals of the British-born Caesar Albinus, and the large assemblage, also in gold, silver, and copper, of Carausius and Allectus, comprising many rare types. The small bronze of Constantine the Great is ex- tremely plentiful and varied, the silver and gold scarce; the same is predicable of the money of Carausius and Allectus. There is another family of Roman coins, to which attention is due — those of earlier reigns restored by the later rulers; they commence with Augustus, and are sometimes far rarer than the original money. Speaking generally, the interest resident in these monuments is either historical or personal, if not both. On the reverses, though in a more limited measure than in the republican money perhaps, and in a different way, there are records of events of which we might otherwise have known nothing; and the portraits of such men as Augustus, Hadrian, Trajan, Marcus Aurelius, Severus, Alexander, Constantine the Great, Julian, and of some of the august ladies who enjoyed the privilege of appearing on the coinage, Livia, Crispina, Matidia, Marciana, Plotina, Domna, inspire us with a strange sympathetic interest, of which 120 THE COLLECTOR SERIES we are not quite able to divest ourselves when we contemplate the effigies of Tiberius, Commodus, Ela- gabalus (whose features belie his character), of Julia, the daughter of Augustus, the two Faustinas, and Lucilla. Of Augustus it may be questioned if we do not obtain in the Divos Ivlivs piece a more veracious resemblance than on the ordinary currency, and the restitutions by Trajan and Titus doubtless natter the founder of the dynasty. Full details of all the rulers and their numismatic incidence may be found in Stevenson, Humphreys, and Akerman ; or, again, where technical minutiae are desired, in Mionnet and Cohen. A gold coin of the emperor Saturninus, noticed in the Revue Numis- matique, appears to be unique, and in the Numismatic Circular of Messrs Spink & Son of London are repre- sentations of two interregnal denarii between Nero and Galba, said to be inedited. There is an enormous disparity in the survival of the Roman series. As many as 20,000 coins in all metals of Aurelian are known, while of a few ephemeral rulers, such as Martinianus, there are perhaps not more than a dozen examples in all metals. PLATE VIII. VI CONTINENT OF EUEOPE The necessarily succinct sketch which we present in this case of the numismatic history of a vast and pro- lific region may be read side by side with the more copious account which we were enabled to furnish in a preceding publication, the "Coinage of the European Continent," 1893-7. The two great sources of inspira- tion and development were Teutonic and Scandinavian, or, in other words, the earliest as well as the best suggestions for modern numismatic productions were derived from the North by different channels, and supplanted the Greek, Eoman, and Byzantine models, which we recognise in the so-termed Merovingian money, and in the primitive currencies of Gaul and Britain. We shall perceive how during centuries the whole of the Continent satisfied itself with a monetary system of the simplest and most meagre description, how in actual circulating media it possessed down to the thirteenth century nothing higher than the silver penny and its equivalent, and how it was the great commercial and religious movement stimulated by the Crusades which, by opening new routes for trade, and drawing more closely together the East 121 122 THE COLLECTOR SERIES and West of Europe and the coasts of Asia and Africa, led to the conception of higher denominations of coined specie of fixed standard, first in silver, and finally in gold. As it had happened in Lydia when Gyges struck for mercantile purposes an electrum stater of 220 grains against one of about 167 for internal use, the early Italian trading communities took the initiative in making, at all events, their gold money of such true weight as to ensure its universal acceptance. The Merovingian triens or tremissis was equal to the third of a Byzantine solidus ; but it was not a commercial currency, nor does there seem to have been any real metallic standard for coins anterior to those established about a.d. 1250-80 by the Floren- tines and Venetians, who adopted and maintained them from motives of financial convenience. The concurrent introduction into Trance, under Louis IX., of gold pieces of broad fabric, probably on a much more restricted scale, divided Europe into two numismatic schools, of which one followed the French, the other the Italian prototype ; and it is singular enough that in France itself certain feudal centres preferred the latter. The first direct initiative in the more modern school of European numismatic art was received from Northern Germany, whence, through the Franks, and perhaps the Lombards to some extent, the new in- fluence spread to Italy, the Low Countries, France, and ultimately the Iberian peninsula. We have to ascribe to the multifarious fruits of trade, navigation, / CONTINENT OF EUROPE 123 and travel, so largely promoted by religious fanaticism, and the unforeseen outcome of the successive expedi- tions to the Holy Land for the recovery of the Sepulchre, the increased call for the means of exchange on a better footing; and the purity and undeviating weight of the mediaeval Italian gold was primarily due to its competition with the high oriental standard. The text which follows, with the matter occupy- ing the latter part of the volume, and the very full information collected in our previous work, should altogether suffice to afford inquirers a tolerably clear and complete view of what, so far as English readers were concerned, remained till recently a very imper- fectly known department of numismatic history. Eng- lish scholars are obviously competent to study, through publications in various languages, the progress and particulars of the coinages of each locality and region within the European frontier ; but the present under- taking is more especially calculated for the service of the majority, who possess neither the leisure nor the in- clination to make themselves masters of the facts, here broadly and methodically stated, by the laborious per- usal of a polyglot library of monographs and other treatises. The marvellous number and extent of the persons and places formerly entitled to issue their own money, and the disappearance or obscurity of the clues to identification in many cases, have combined with im- perfect lines of succession and broken or fragmentary records of numismatic policy and enterprise to em- 124 THE COLLECTOR SERIES barrass the labours of the most indefatigable among the Continental workers, and to compel them to leave certain series with lacunae to be supplied hereafter; and this condition of affairs, which may be partly attributed to the loss of their archives by petty States and the committal of the obsolete coinages to the crucible, exists in the face of continuous research and continuous discussion. The grand series of groups of numismatic produc- tion which the European Continental section of this work offers to our view forms a virtual sequel to the monetary history of Rome, and may be considered as commencing at the point where the coinage of the Western Empire, with the exception of the ephemeral exarchate of Ravenna, determines. During centuries we have to note the lingering influence of the masters of the ancient world in the imitation of their types, subject to such changes as modified political and religious conditions insensibly accom- plished, and at the same time necessitated. A mainly new nomenclature and symbolism for the coins them- selves arose, but classical history or mythology was recollected in such forms as Hercules, Phoebus, Achilles, Julius Caesar, Augustus, Cicero, Theodore, Demetrius, Alexander, Michael, Philippus, Constantinus, Octavius, occasionally disguised by linguistic postulates. Until the Frankish authority was more or less consolidated in the person of Charlemagne about the close of the eighth century of our era, there was no central power in succession to that of Rome on the Continent, nor CONTINENT OF EUROPE 125 can it be said that that prince exercised more than a suzerainty over a great part of the dominions titularly comprehended within his empire. Already in the sixth century the enormous volume of money, usually designated Merovingian, began to issue from a large number of mints in the Low Countries, France, and Spain, while the more immediate followers in the foot- steps of the Komans, and the temporary inheritors of that soil, the Goths and the Lombards, produced a currency in all metals (though sparingly in gold) partly on the Eoman and partly on the Teutonic model. The imperial system soon resolved itself numismatically into the enjoyment of the right of striking money by a numerous body of autonomous states under the sanction of the Frankish or German Caesar ; and in France, where the jurisdiction of the emperors was soon lost, and in the Peninsula, where it only revived with the rise of the great Spanish monarchy in the single person of Charles V., the crown long remained too weak to preclude the great feudatories from having their own mints. Never- theless, there is of the Frankish and other dynasties, which successively swayed the fortunes of Germany, the Netherlands, and Italy, a notable assemblage of coins of all kinds, either of pure imperial origin or with mixed types, exhibiting the names of cities or princes in conjunction with the name and cogni- sance of the superior lord. This principle survived down to the last days of the old regime. But there were exceptions to its observ- ance. The Italian republics, for the most part, re- 126 THE COLLECTOR SERIES nounced the pretensions of the emperor or king of the Romans in this respect at an early date, and Savoy, the Holy See, Florence, and Milan, the two Sicilies, and other powers followed a similar course. The admission of the claim had its real or sup- posed advantages ; it was an acknowledgment of vas- salage, but it was a plea for protection on the part of the minor governments from their more power- ful neighbours. This point is treated more at large in our other work, and we may now proceed to furnish an outline of the numismatic history of the European Continent, with the premonitory notice that a great deal of further information may be found in that volume. Starting with Westphalia, we meet with many important coin-centres, such as Cologne, Munster, Paderborn, Salm, Bronkhorst, and Dortmund, as well as the scarce and ephemeral currency of Walmoden- Gimborn ; and in conclusion there is, though extending over a short period (1806-13), the somewhat prolific coinage, in all metals, of Jerome Napoleon, king of Westphalia, who had previously, as Grand-Duke of Berg, issued various pieces with his portrait and titles. In the Rhenish Provinces there are the Duchies of Cleves, Juliers, and Berg (subsequently united to Saxony), the two branches of the house of Hohen- zollern, and the very important town of Aix-la- Chapelle or Aachen, the residence and burial-place of Charlemagne. The Counts and Dukes of Nassau, the CONTINENT OF EUROPE 127 Counts of Schaumburg-Lippe, the Princes of Waldeck, the Counts of Sayn, the Counts of Lichtenstein, and the Archbishops of Mayence, all struck an abundance of money in each metal at Wiesbaden and elsewhere. The coinage of the undivided landgraviat of Hesse commences with bracteates with the Hessian lion, and develops into a rich volume of currency in gold, silver, and copper, the thaler first appearing in 1502. The earlier specimens are particularly scarce. Within this territory were several feudal mints, including Isenburg and Oppenheim. Frankfort - on - the - Main was once the Frankish capital, and continued during centuries to enjoy poli- tical and monetary autonomy ; we have numismatic examples from the eleventh to the nineteenth century (1866). The absolute right to strike its own money was conferred in 1428. The margraviat, afterward grand-duchy, of Baden, of which there were two branches down to 1771, is less remarkable on account of its own coinage, which dates from an early period, than as the seat of several independent mints, of which we may mention Mannheim, Ulm, Leiningen, Freiburg - in - Brisgau, Breisach, etc., almost all of which issued currency anterior to that of the margraviat itself; the earlier specimens of Baden, especially the gold, are difficult to procure. Wurtemburg, at first a county, then (1492) a duchy, and finally (1806) a kingdom, with which, till 1792, was incorporated the countship of Mont- 128 THE COLLECTOR SERIES beliard, presents a large body of material to the collector or student in all metals from the fourteenth century ; there was a separate coinage for Montbeliard in the lower values; the full titles on the money describe the sovereign as Count or Duke of Wurtem- burg, Count of Montbeliard, and Lord of Heidenheim. The gold ducats of Duke Ulric are varied through the course of his protracted reign (1498-1550); there are many pieces interesting for the costume. Copper liards with well-executed portraits were struck for Montbeliard in the early part of the eighteenth century. We call attention to the extensive area of research and selection existing in Bavaria and the Palatinate, a region interesting in connection with the Thirty Years' War and its incidence, and the union of the Palsgraf Frederic with Elizabeth Stuart. Gardiner's " History of the War," 1874, should be consulted. It is here that we have to place the not very extensive but peculiarly interesting money of the princely family of the Fuggers, dating from 1534, when Charles V. ac- corded to Anton Fugger, Herr von Weissenhorn, who died in 1560, the right of striking his own coins; these have usually on the reverse the imperial titles and symbol. When we enter Saxony, there is a great diffi- culty in emerging without entering into an amount of detail which is at present impossible ; for the par- tition of the province among several reigning houses, and the concurrent existence of a large number of in- dependent feudal and urban centres, have combined to CONTINENT OF EUROPE 129 accumulate a store of numismatic records alike un- surpassed in extent and variety, in historical value, and in fidelity and excellence of portraiture. The recognisable coinage dates from the tenth century. The modern kingdom, dating from 1806, is, of course, only a portion of what was embraced within the same geographical term. There were the separate states of Saxe-Weimar (subdivided into Old, New, and Middle Weimar, and Weimar - Jena), Saxe-Coburg, Saxe- Meiningen, Saxe - Hilburghausen, Saxe - Saalf eld, and Saxe-Altenburg, each of which had its monetary system, subject to periodical political changes. In Saxe-Mein- ingen we have the coinage of the Counts of Henneberg, to which belong rare early thalers. We mention Anhalt, of which there were for- merly four branches, Schwarzburg and Schwarzburg- Eudolstadt, and Eeuss Senior and Junior (each throw- ing out various branches), of which any single division would suffice to engage the exclusive attention and resources of a collector, and pass on to Brunswick, which resembles Saxony in the subdivisions of the ruling family, but far less so in the minor places of coinage. There were at one time six branches, of which one, Luneburg, acquired signal distinction as the origin of the present royal house of Great Britain through a double tie — Henry the Lion and Elizabeth of Bohemia. The grand numismatic monuments of this state, more especially of the Luneburg line, ought, however, to command interest apart from any colla- teral consideration. I 130 THE COLLECTOR SERIES There is a good deal of instructive matter to be gleaned from the coinages of points within the Bruns- wick frontier, particularly Gottingen, Goslar, Hildes- heim, and East Friesland ; and the same may be said when we approach the North, and take in succession Oldenburg, which possesses curious early dated pieces ; Holstein, with its three branches; the Hanse towns, particularly Lubeek and Hamburg, the latter once the seat of the great Von Hovel family, whose castle may be seen on its coins ; Mecklenburg, permanently associated in its undivided state with the illustrious Wallenstein, and now forming two duchies, Mecklenburg-Schwerin and Mecklenburg-Strelitz ; and finally Pommern or Pomerania, with a group of towns on the Baltic coast — Wismar, Rostock, Wolgast — round which a religious curiosity has gathered, as the seats in old times of a nature-worship symbolised on their money, and common to many other places. Brandenburg is a name borne by a margraviat and electorate, as well as by a margraviat in Franconia, and by the branches of Anspach and Bayreuth. With the three last are connected series of coins dating back to an early period, and in all metals. The electorate was the germ of the modern kingdom of Prussia through the acquisition of Brandenburg, in 1415, by Friedrich von Hohenzollern, Burggraf of Nurnberg, by purchase from the Emperor Sigismund. Long prior to the ex- istence of Prussia as a kingdom, it was in a contracted sense a duchy subject to Poland ; the Dukes of Massow, whose capital was Warsaw, and of whose money, struck at CONTINENT OF EUROPE 131 Culm, in Western Prussia, we have no direct knowledge, and later on the Teutonic knights, who have left ample monetary records (1195-1572), occupied the remainder. In or about 1525, Albrecht, Margraf of Brandenburg, having become Grand Master and seized the possessions of the Order, was made duke of Prussia under Polish suzerainty; but in 1657 this territory vested abso- lutely in Brandenburg, and so remained till 1701, when Wilhelm III. assumed the crown of Pkussia. It was while he was Margraf, and in 1681, that, having acquired a settlement on the coast of Guinea, he made the maiden essay of the Prussians in colonising it, and striking money for its use. His money as Mar- graf is common, but as king (1701-1713) is peculiarly scarce ; nor is that of his successor, above all the silver, easily obtained. The coins of Frederick the Great, except the in- auguration ducat of 1740 and the thaler s of 1741 and 1750, are abundant, and those of the later monarchs call for no special comment. Numismatically speaking, the changes in territorial distribution after the events of 1815 Bggrandised Prussia at the expense of Saxony. Silesia, Mansfeld, and Stolberg, of which the two latter formed themselves into branches, were down to the end of the eighteenth or early years of the nineteenth centuries, prolific sources of monetary production. On Stolberg the stag, and on Mansfeld St George and the Dragon, were immovable types. Both houses produced a distinguished soldier in the Thirty Years' War ; but 132 THE COLLECTOR SERIES the former has to boast the permanent literary claims of the two brothers whose names are familiar in the German poetical annals of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. The coinage of Silesia was various, according to the locality whence it proceeded, with the exception of that of the ancient dukes. At Liegnitz the early kings of Poland struck money for Polish Prussia, including gold florins of the Italian type. Austria, first a margraviat, afterward a duchy and archduchy, and ultimately an empire, struck bracteates in primitive times of very numerous types. The Flo- rentine gold pattern was adopted by Albrecht I. (1298- 1308); and we owe to this source the earliest dated thalers, executed with great care and skill, particularly that of Maximilian and Mary of Burgundy, 1479, of which there are three distinct varieties, and those of 1505, 1509, 1516, and 1518, with the older bust. There are also magnificent gold coins in this series. With Austria are connected by political ties the Tyrol, Car- inthia, Moravia, Istria, Styria, Dalmatia, Bohemia, Hungary, Transylvania, nearly all of which had been originally sources of autonomous coinage on a large scale, and, in fact, offer to our consideration numismatic examples equal in character and interest to any which Austria itself possesses. Hungary still retains its own currency ; Bohemia and Transylvania did so till the last century. The Madonna and Child is an almost invariable Hungarian type, and on some of the modern pieces for that part of the empire the peculiar form of the Magyar crown may be observed. CONTINENT OF EUROPE 133 The Swiss Coinage leaves little to be desired in regard to its extent, duration, and variety. It is divisible into imperial, feudal, cantonal, and federal. Historically, the series of early money of bracteate or semi-bracteate fabric is perhaps the most important; but the pieces most attractive in aspect belong to the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, although the can- tonal and federal coinage of the last and even present century is handsome and well executed, and occasion- ally exhibit views of the city to which it refers. Some of the ancient coins, as the St Gallen plappart of 1424, the Bern thaler of 1494, and the dicken of 1492, of which an example is known, struck in gold, are of signal rarity, a characteristic which is shared by several large silver . pieces of later date, like the celebrated thaler struck by Cardinal Schinner, with his portrait as Bishop of Sitten, and the Zurich thaler of 1512, presenting the three Martyrs carrying their heads before them. The coinage of Poland, traceable to very rudi- mentary and barbarous beginnings, remained without great perceptible improvement till the reign of Sigis- mund I. (1506-48), who gave a powerful impetus to this feature in the national life and character, and from whose time dates that advance in fabric and style which continued to the end. The earlier numismatists apparently enjoyed a very imperfect acquaintance with the volume and variety of this extensive and important series. Down to a certain period a considerable portion of 134 THE COLLECTOR SERIES Prussia belonged to the dukes and kings of Poland, and special money was struck for East Prussia, as well as for Livonia, acquired by marriage from the Jagellon dynasty. Of coins in the highest metal struck for Poland itself we have seen nothing prior to the reign of Sigismund II. Augustus. But of some of his successors there are pUces de plaisir of very high denominations and of great commercial value. The earliest thaler ( = 30 Polish groschen) was struck in 1564 for Livonia. The smaller silver denominations in this group of currency are the most abundant ; the older thalers in fine state, and well-preserved copper, are of extreme rarity, and the ducat and its multiples are not common. Those of John IIL Sobieski pre- sent a life-like portrait of that celebrated personage; but the most realistic one accompanies the fine thaler of 1685. The latest autonomous Polish piece which we have is a six-groszy of 1794. Russia was of course far behind the Poles in every respect, and down to the reign of Peter the Great had no coinage worthy of a great nation. The cradles of metallic currency, when the system of bartering skins was gradually abandoned, had been Kiev and Nov- gorod. An effort was made by one of the dukes of Muscovy at the end of the fifteenth century to intro- duce Hungarian gold types, but nothing was then accomplished, nor was the alleged mission of Walter Basbee, assay-master of the Goldsmiths' Company, in 1608, to the court of the Czar, on the part of James I. of Great Britain, in order to assist in the reform CONTINENT OF EUROPE 135 of the coinage, more successful ; and so far as we are aware, the coinage of Peter, 1704, was the first essay toward a general reform of the system, that of Alexie or Alexis Michailovitch, 1654, amounting to scarcely more than an isolated experiment. But Eussia used to a very considerable extent in the seventeenth century the money of Germany and the Netherlands and even Italy, with countermarks rendering it current. Peter the Great lived to see the circulating medium of his country placed nearly on an equality with that of more westerly states, and his successors have certainly in this respect, so far as the fabric and workmanship are concerned, maintained the standard. There are many rare and little-known patterns of Peter himself, Catherine I., Peter II., and other sovereigns of the Eussias, which have lately realised considerable amounts at foreign sales. The rouble of Peter I. (1725) and that of Catherine I. of same date, with head to left, are considered scarce. Of the Danubian Provinces, Moldavia, Wallachia, Eoumania, Bulgaria, Bosnia, and Servia, the numis- matic annals have varied with their political vicissi- tudes. Some of the money goes back to the eleventh century, and much of it to the fourteenth. The early coins of Bogdana bear, as a symbol or type, the mys- tical bull's head, so common in Germany and in the Baltic district. The fabric and style of the more ancient coins of Bulgaria and Servia are Byzantine; the Servian currency of the fourteenth century is partly copied from Greek models, both of the ordinary and of 136 THE COLLECTOR SERIES the concave form, and partly follows the lines of the Venetian grosso called matapan. Since 1867 these states have been erected into autonomous governments, with the exception of Bosnia, which remains under Austrian jurisdiction. Of Georgia there are copper coins of irregular form belonging to the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. A sufficient sketch of the monetary system of the Latin Empire established after the Fourth Crusade, and of those of modern Greece and Turkey in Europe, may be found elsewhere. The expedition of the Vene- tians and their allies to the Holy Land vid Constan- tinople effected in the whole of Eastern Europe a political revolution, of which the fruits lasted in some instances during centuries ; and this event laid the foundation of the colonial currency of Venice for the territories which the republic thus acquired in 1204. One of the rare pieces in this series is the imitation of the Venetian gold ducat struck by the Duke of Milan for Chios during his temporary sovereignty over Genoa. The Northern Kingdoms, Denmark, Sweden, and Norway, have always possessed a certain characteristic individuality, distinct even from those countries by which they are more immediately bounded. From what has been said in another place, it is easily in- ferable that the numismatic fortunes of these three kingdoms have been strongly and strangely influenced, not so much by external agencies as by civil or inter- national disagreements and struggles. From time to time the balance of power was shifted between Sweden FLALtt IX, CONTINENT OF EUROPE 137 and Denmark, both of which have weakened and im- poverished themselves in bygone days by interference in foreign wars, while Norway has never achieved any sensible share of importance either in its government or in its coinage, the Norwegian money having been at all times for the most part of Danish or Swedish origin. The archaic coins of this entire region, of which none can perhaps be assigned to a period anterior to the tenth century, appear to have been modelled on the Anglo-Saxon types of Ethelred II. ; a find of these silver sterlings in Norway some few years since led to the hypothesis that they might have been struck there. But the Danish and Swedish mints soon learned to emulate the best productions of other countries; and the very reasons which have caused the currencies of these two realms to descend to us as a broken and irregular record constitute in our eyes an additional attraction, as they were the means of calling into existence an unusually large body of money of neces- sity, and of pieces issued by usurpers or competitors for the throne. Of late years the attention of col- lectors has been' drawn in a greatly increased measure to the Scandinavian provinces on two grounds : the curiosity of the more ancient monuments and their connection with England, and the fine workmanship and historical interest of those belonging to more recent times. Sweden associates with itself the names of Gustavus Adolphus, his daughter Christina, the great minister Oxenstierna, Charles XII., as well as the singular phenomenon offered in the ponderous 138 THE COLLECTOR SERIES copper plate-money of the eighteenth century, and the series of very rare early gold money. The earlier Danish Colonial money is of extreme rarity, especially the Indian pagodas countermarked for Danish use. In entering the Low Countries we soon become sen- sible that we are on ground which has been trodden by a remarkable succession of rulers, and which, looking at their comparatively limited area, exhibit a residual assemblage of currencies belonging to dynasts, fiefs, towns, and provinces, of which nearly all have passed into the domain of history, of which many are obscure, and of which a few have left only numismatic vouchers for their existence. Throughout Belgium and Holland formerly flourished numerous powerful feudatories prac- tically independent of the imperial authority, pros- perous cities and towns, almost equally autonomous, and a host of minor seigneurs, of whom all have trans- mitted to us proofs of their importance, wealth, and taste in a huge volume of obsolete money in the various metals, of infinitely diversified types, of countless deno- minations ; and each trouvaille adds to the aggregate and to our knowledge of the several series. There are many excellent compilations and mono- graphs dealing with the coinages of the Northern and Southern Netherlands. Of the latter, the prominent divisions in ancient times were Brabant, Namur, Liege, Limburg, Reckheim, Luxemburg, Flanders, Hainault, Artois, Saint Pol, and Boulogne. These fiefs or states constituted sources during a very lengthened period of great numismatic activity. Liege was not only a busy CONTINENT OF EUROPE 139 episcopal mint, but (with Maestricht) a very early and leading one of the emperors. Loos and Rummen, even- tually merged in the See of Liege, produced a variety of money in all metals, of which some is of extreme rarity. Brabant, Luxemburg, and Flanders, under their respective dukes or counts, attained in their coinage a wealth and splendour absolutely regal. In the north we have the great feudal houses of s'Heerenberg and Bronkhorst in Gronsfeld, the latter associated with the illustrious family of Brederode, with many other baronial and seigniorial centres, of which it is necessary to specify the Counts of Holland and West Friesland, the Counts and Dukes of Gueldres, and the Bishops of Utrecht, with each of which are connected elaborate monetary systems of long dura- tion and signal importance. The coinages of Holland (county) and West Friesland, as well as that of the See of Utrecht, commence abruptly, and we have evidently a good deal yet to learn about the products of the parent mints of these districts. By the Amersfoort Find (1894) some additions were made to our acquaint- ance with the gold currency of Gueldres; but there were almost certainly coins of Holland and Utrecht prior to any at present identifiable; the sumptuous gold florins of the latter may be commended to notice. Besides the feudal currencies of the Netherlands there are those of the United Provinces, of the Batavian Republic, of the Brabantine Revolution of 1790, of the Austrian, Spanish, and English rulers, and of the kingdoms of Holland, the Netherlands, and the Bel- 140 THE COLLECTOR SERIES gians, without reckoning a vast Dutch colonial series extending over two centuries and a half, and at one period emanating independently from each province. It is unnecessary to point out the voluminous and intricate monetary policy arising out of the unwieldy, and decentralised imperial system, and appurtenant to a scheme of local government by vassals of the Crown often as powerful as the Crown itself; but with the formation of Holland into a kingdom in 1806 the old rSgime may be considered to have been brought to an end, as the subsequent changes in 1816 and 1830 were matters of detail. Throughout the less remote epoch, from the sixteenth century downward, the most attrac- tive and superb examples of numismatic art abound. The Leicester series is apt to be interesting to English folk ; it extends from 1586 to 1659, or later (long after the Earl's death), and consists of the thaler and its divi- sions of various dates. The coins of William the Silent and of William Henry of Orange, afterward William III. of Great Britain, in all metals command attention. Italy possesses manifold titles to our special conside- ration as having been the cradle of the ancient Roman coinage, as having passed through a succession of political revolutions, each of which left its numismatic traces and lessons behind it for our instruction, as the seat of the alleged patrimony of St Peter, which was to outlive all revolutions, and embracing within its fron- tiers Venice and Florence, and as the only region where the finest productions of German medallic art were eclipsed. Subsequently to the fall of the Western CONTINENT OF EUROPE 141 Empire the invasions in turn of the Ostrogoths, the Lombards, the Franks, and the Germans, gradually tended to bring the Italian coinage in its fabric and feeling into closer touch with that of the Scandinavian and Teutonic communities of Northern Europe. The Ostrogoths themselves had largely adopted the mone- tary style and module of the nation which they entered the peninsula to replace ; but those who came after them, especially the Franks and the Germans, changed the prevailing type, and substituted that which formed the standard one throughout Western Europe during many centuries. The Ostrogothic and Lombard series, the former in all metals, the latter in gold and silver only, are of considerable extent, and embrace certain examples in gold of extreme rarity and commercial value. The most usual pieces are the Gothic copper nummi and the Lombard silica and half -silica in poor silver ; but the latter people also established their rule in Sicily and Naples, where they retained their ground longer than in the North. A fair account of the Italian numismatic annals of this period of transition is to be found in our former volume, 1893, as well as in the Appendix to it, 1897. We have elsewhere shown how the aggrandisement of the Frankish power under Pepin of Herstal and his son Charles or Charlemagne prepared the way, through the decentralising and unfeebling action of a political growth or structure too heavy for its base, for the rise and consolidation of the Holy See on the one hand, and of the republics, especially that of Venice, on 142 THE COLLECTOR SERIES the other. Already in the fifth century the Venetians had laid the first stone of that wondrous constitutional edifice which was to witness the rise and evanescence of so many other States ; and in the ninth we may say that the Republic and the Papacy were the two powers in the peninsula most independent of the imperial authority. Many other communities, as we learn from Sismondi, formed themselves by degrees into virtually autonomous governments resting on a federal basis, and preserved this freedom for a longer or shorter period according to local or other circumstances ; but those which had risen by commerce survived those which had risen by mere force of arms. Eventually there was a reflux of imperialism, which in the eighteenth century absorbed nearly all these states in succession, and even Venice fell at last in the Great Revolution. The Papacy remains ; but its temporal jurisdiction has passed away for ever ; and the whole of the land, which once included the most marvellous nationality (for Venice was nothing less), and gave birth on Corsican soil to the greatest soldier in the world, is united under one sovereign and one monetary system, which has been recently disimproved by the introduction of a nickel coinage — one of the vilest inventions of numismatic man. The almost numberless currencies and descriptions of money in use among the mediaeval Italians and Sicilians constitute not only an ample volume of historically, artistically, and technically important archives, but one CONTINENT OF EUROPE 143 infinitely diversified by the force of local conditions or political exigencies. The most singular anomaly con- nected with this portion of our subject is the slenderness of the interest attendant on the lengthened and enor- mous series of coins in every metal and of the most varied denominations issued in the names of the Doges of Venice between the twelfth and the eighteenth cen- turies, owing to the monotony of the type and the poverty of style. Possibly it suited the views of a com- mercial people to maintain a uniformity of pattern intelligible to the trader of every country ; but through all that long lapse of time we meet, except in the Oselle, with the fewest possible variations of legend and design. Even the Florentines, who were greatly indebted to trade as a source of wealth and strength, did not study this principle prior to the Medici period ; but in Milan, Naples, Mantua, Ferrara, Monteferrato, Saluzzo, Savoy, and other coin-striking centres, the desire seems long to have been to outvie one another in the splendour and variety of the money, which remains in our hands to-day a precious inheritance for all lovers of what is beautiful. In Sicily and Naples the gold Merovingian types for some time prevailed, and were superseded under the Normans by gold money, often with bilingual (Arabic and Latin) legends, and a bronze currency which followed the lines of the heavy Greek coinage in that metal for Syracuse and other localities, just as we have observed that the Ostrogothic bronze nummi were modelled on the old Roman system. Of all the productions of this region down to the Renaissance, 144 THE COLLECTOR SERIES those in the lowest metal strike us as the most curious ; and, indeed, the two Sicilies formed a region where, to the last, special attention seems to have been paid to this class of medium, and where we meet with a sur- prising number of coins in unbroken sequence from Hellenic times, but unhappily not too often in an irreproachable state. It strikes us as more probable that Sicily borrowed the idea of the heavier bronze (ten grani or tornesi) from the long anterior Russian five-kopek pieces than from England. Alike at Bene- ventum and Salerno, under the Lombards, the Arch- angel Michael appears as a tutelary symbol. One of the most conspicuous rarities in the later Sicilian series is a double gold ducat of Charles III. (Charles VI. of Germany), 1723. It appears to have been wanting in all the collections, and is one of His Majesty the King of Italy's desiderata. A very fine specimen fell a few years ago in the way of the writer. The reader must be invited to refer for fuller par- ticulars of all the Italian coinages, and of the rarities in the several series, to our larger book, and the authorities there cited, collaterally with the new facts enumerated below, and in Hazlitt's " Venetian Republic," 1900. The special desiderata in the Sicilian series are indicated by us in another place. The autonomous coinage of the Knights of St John of Jerusalem at Rhodes, Candia, and Malta has found a capable historian in M. Furse, whose large mono- graph deserves to be better known to collectors. It is a series abounding in fine examples of workmanship CONTINENT OF EUROPE 145 and portraiture, but which offers many almost insuper- able difficulties to the aspirant to completeness, as some of the earlier pieces are of the first order of rarity, and nearly all the silver and copper occur, as a rule, either poorly struck or in a condition which the French describe as laid. The early gold sequins (of Venetian type) are common enough, with a few notable exceptions; but they are so carelessly executed as to be uninviting. The later heavy gold is of frequent occurrence, but is worth only its weight in metal. The most covetable acquisitions are the large silver scudi, dating, except one or two special issues, from about 1720, and the earlier copper in fine state. France presents to our view a sufficiently extensive and intricate monetary system, though far less so than Germany or the Low Countries, inasmuch as the rights of coinage enjoyed by a very large body of feudatories throughout the Middle Ages, and down to the firm establishment of the House of Bourbon on the throne, were taken back by the Crown at an earlier period than in the two divisions of Europe just mentioned, leaving only the regal currency for our consideration. It has been explained at some length elsewhere that the volume of old French money in our hands owes its magnitude in part to the almost innumerable varieties of type and issue due to political exigencies, from the long dedication of a separate coinage to certain pro- vinces of the kingdom, as well as to a host of baronial or seigniorial tenants, and also to the personal caprice of the sovereign or his moneyers ; and this statement K 146 l^bE COLLECTOR SERIES is particularly true of the protracted reigns of Charles VI. and Louis XL (1380-1461). It is readily observable that in this highly interesting series we pass through successive stages: the Mero- vingian era, when the prevailing metal was gold ; the Carolingian, when the currency was almost exclusively silver ; the Capetian, when we meet with little beyond billon of careless execution and a sparing supply of gold, commencing with the latter portion of the reign of Louis IX.; the Valesian (1328-1589), in which the gold becomes more plentiful, the silver is somewhat improved, and copper of good workman- ship is introduced; and the Bourbon one, which, in point of fabric, character, and execution, easily excels all that preceded. Yet, looking at the wealth, great- ness, and power of France, and her opportunities of employing the best engravers and the most efficient machinery, we desist from a survey of her whole numis- matic life with a feeling of surprise and disappoint- ment. We take up the Frankish deniers and oboles of Charlemagne and his successors to the end of the tenth century, and place them side by side with their equivalents under the Capetian rulers and French arti- ficers, and the contrast is impressive enough ; the latter constitute an unsatisfactory and repellent array of poorly engraved and struck examples on billon blanks, originally washed with a solution of silver or white metal, but as a rule divested by hard wear of every trace of the plating process. It is not till we arrive at the great reforms accom- CONTINENT OF EUROPE 147 plished under Louis IX., about the middle of the thirteenth century, that we meet with any creditable specimens of numismatic art, and that after a length- ened interval of sterile monotony there comes not only a new era in the silver coinage, but the singular pheno- menon of gold types wholly differing from those almost simultaneously instituted by Italy and Germany, where the Venetian or Florentine models prevailed. The broad pieces struck under the authority of Louis about 1250 did undoubted honour to those concerned in pro- ducing them; and his successors of the Capetian and Valesian lines maintained the character and standard of this branch of the national coinage, which lasted down to the middle of the seventeenth century, when it gave place to the louis-d'or and its divisions and multiples in 1640, in common with the silver currency — the ecu d 'argent and its fractions — the copper remain- ing unchanged, till the following reign substituted the Hard and other denominations. Meanwhile, the feudal series, which must be under- stood to comprise the vassals of the French crown of all grades and all measures of subservience, including Burgundy, Normandy, Brittany, Lorraine, and other grand fiefs, whose allegiance was more or less nominal, had swollen to a bulk which far surpassed that of the monarchy, and which embraced within its limits pro- ductions transcending in personal or in artistic interest those of the suzerain. Perhaps, indeed, it may be advanced as a general proposition that the redeeming features of the French system lie outside the direct 148 THE COLLECTOR SERIES dynastic succession, and are to be sought in the feudal, Franco-Italian, Franco-Spanish, and Napoleonic coins, apart from a group of essais or patterns of superior style by Briot and others, which the G-overnment usually rejected. Altogether, we perceive in this case a vast assemblage of metallic monuments, which, as a special collection, are decidedly undesirable, from the unusual poverty of their character and condition, but among which it is not difficult to make choice of a considerable assort- ment of specimens in all the branches — the earlier colonial inclusive — equally attractive and interesting from many points of view, and in some instances associated with great historical names. In turning over the pages of such works as those by Hoffmann and Poey d'Avant, the student or amateur is apt to form a more favourable idea of the French series than a personal examination of ordinary pieces will probably give, as the engravings are derived to a large extent from examples in the Bibliotheque, or natter the originals. The representative or eclectic plan is by far the best and safest here ; to become complete is an impossibility; and the collector has the option of starting with the Merovingian and Carolingian money, which is Frankish or Franco-German rather than French, or with the true national series from Charles le Chauve, or even from Hugues Capet. The gold or the copper money alone would constitute an agreeable study and an ample collection. We have, in conclusion, to deal with the Iberian CONTINENT OF EUROPE 149 Peninsula, a region subject to very peculiar numis- matic as well as political experiences, and on whose soil many different races have left their footprints and their influence without affecting France, except on its southern frontier. The earliest known coinage of Spain belongs to peoples who were not Spaniards in blood, language, or religion. The Greek, the Carthaginian, the Eoman, the Moor, the Arab, struck coins of the types with which they were familiar in their own lands, before the Spaniards existed as a nation, and even before the states which were to be united under Ferdinand and Isabella were recognised. The earliest monetary system of Spain is divisible into several broad sections : (i.) Celtiberian, Phoenician or Punic, Greek, and Eoman ; (ii.) colonial, municipal and urban, and regal. The last category is susceptible of sub-classification into heads answering to the succes- sive political centralising and decentralising movements which the country from time to time underwent, until the final union under Charles V. (rather than under Fer- dinand and Isabella), if it did not reduce the currency to a uniform standard and type, placed it on a more national footing. But long subsequently to the accession of the House of Aragon the various provinces and towns of Spain retained, as elsewhere, the right of coinage ; an extensive catalogue of localities occurs in Hazlitt's "List of Mints" where money was struck indepen- dently of the crown, and down to the present century some of the outlying portions of the kingdom preserved 150 THE COLLECTOR SERIES the memory and recognition of their former numismatic autonomy in special types and legends sanctioned by the central authority. From the remotest times the output of urban currencies must have been very large. M. Heiss enters at much greater length, of course, than in a general survey of the present kind is possible, into the political distribution of the Peninsula among different classes of townships and other local govern- ments, accounting for the extensive numismatic remains of various characters which have descended to us in connection with this region. It is evident that the Greek and Roman influence survived here much longer than in France, and that, even when it became feebler and fainter, the inhabitants of Spain, instead of receiv- ing lessons from the Western and Northern invaders and civilisers of the Gaulish territory, fell in this as in other respects under the sway of the powerful African element, which so largely contributed to promote their national culture. The early Spanish coinage is mainly concerned with the large and important provinces of Granada, Aragon, L£on, Castile, Catalufia, Valencia, and Navarre, all of which originally possessed and retained independent monetary rights. Down to a comparatively recent period, the two last-named divisions of Spain struck their own currency ; and after the accession of Henry I. of Navarre to the French throne in 1589 as Henry IV., coins were issued by France for Lower, and by Spain for Upper Navarre. The plentiful numismatic remains of Leon and Castile subsequently to their union, and of CONTINENT OF EUROPE 151 those states posterior to the marriage of Ferdinand of Aragon with Isabella or Elizabeth of Castile, are suffi- ciently well known, and comprise a great number of examples of unmistakable individuality. The produc- tions of Navarre and Valencia are far less common, and among them we find interesting pieces, especially those with the portraits of the house of D'Albret. For Catalufla we have a special coinage down to the reign of Isabella II. Although the ancient Moorish dominion enters much less conspicuously into the later political history of the country, the monetary fortunes of Granada participated in the striking changes and developments which this part of the Peninsula experienced from the first settle- ment of the Carthaginians there, and the foundation of Carthago Nova (Cartagena) in the third century before our era. All that is manly and noble in Spanish life and archaeology owed their existence to African inspiration and energy ; the Moorish blood and intellect raised almost every grand monument which we see or of which we hear ; and the famous Alhambra was at one time, like the mediaeval palace both in Eastern and Western Europe and in Asia, the royal residence, the seat of government, the prison, and the mint. Coins have descended to us bearing in their legends that they were struck in the Alhambra of Granada. In some other ways the Gothic element in Spain was influential for good, but not numismatically so, for the money of the Visigothic princes is merely a degraded form of the Merovingian or of the Byzantine patterns, 152 THE COLLECTOR SERIES and the first marked impulse toward an improvement in the fabric and execution of the currency of any part of the Peninsula seems to have come from Aragon, where, in the twelfth century, we meet with dinheri and grossi, exhibiting a long advance in the art of por- traiture, and of good silver, chiefly from the mint at Barcelona. At the same time, Castile and L6on pre- served the old billon money, slightly modified from Visigothic prototypes, and the Moorish gold pieces, on which, as we perceive from one engraved here, Alfonso VIII. about 1190 inserted in the field the letters A L F as a first step toward the establishment of a Castilian medium in that metal. In this, as in other parts of Europe, it was the middle of the fourteenth century which witnessed a general revival of art and taste, and Castile then took the lead under Pedro the Cruel (1350-60) in numismatic activity, so far as the institution of a gold coinage, including certain sump- tuous pieces of high value, was concerned. The ordinary escudi of this reign are tolerably abundant, and were probably struck in considerable numbers, a testimony to the growing national prosperity ; but the multiples, no doubt, were destined for presentation, or for other than commercial purposes. The consolidation of the Spanish monarchy and its temporary aggrandisement under Ferdinand and Isabella, Charles V., and Philip II. by maritime dis- covery and commercial enterprise, led to the present branch of the European coinage attaining and pre- serving during centuries a high rank and repute. The PLATE X, OF T OF CONTINENT OF EUROPE 153 Spanish doubloon and piece of eight are familiar to all ; but the collector who engages in the task of forming a cabinet of Spanish coins becomes aware that he has committed himself to a vast, multifarious, intricate, and costly series, which embraces the inheritance left to us by Celt, Carthaginian, Sueve, Goth, and Moor, modified by French and other foreign influences of later advent. The political and commercial supremacy of Spain scarcely outlived the days of Charles V., but the money issued under the authority of its rulers, while it was internally less varied, grew, and long remained under his immediate successors, and under the Bourbons, of enormous volume, and comprehended separate monetary systems, with Spanish types, for the possessions or dependencies in Europe and America. From 1580 to 1640 the kings of Spain struck coins for Portugal, which Philip II. had annexed or restored to his dominions. On the other hand, France struck coins for parts of Spain from 1642 to 1648, and from 1809 to 1813. The former series is in silver and copper, and is very ill- struck, and scarcely ever procurable in tolerable state. Elsewhere we have set out some of the prominent rarities and difficulties of the series under notice, and additional particulars occur in the Numismatic Cir- cular. With these facts and suggestions to guide him, the student should have no fear of being unable to arrive at an approximate view of the subject, and the monumental works of Heiss are at hand to assist those whose aim it may be to enter into this section more exhaustively. We are not to overlook the occasional 154 THE COLLECTOR SERIES intimacy of political relations between England and the Peninsula in the marriages of Eleanor of Castile, John of Gaunt, and Philip II., and in the British possession of Gibraltar. The coinages of Central and Southern America, not reckoning indigenous products prior to the Spanish epoch, have largely partaken of the nationality of the early conquerors, as they have been influenced by the constant political changes which have affected that vast region. In the respective metals, the peso, the dollar, and the centavo have always constituted the main currency ; but money of necessity of all kinds has been an unfailing periodical incidence. Portugal, in the first instance an integral portion of Spain, and erected into a county by Alfonso VI. of Castile (1078-1109) in favour of Henry of Burgundy, his son-in-law, in 1094, completes the numismatic survey which has been undertaken of the European states. From having been at the outset an appanage of the mother-kingdom, this government gradually acquired, in the same manner as Spain, and about the same period, and retained during an even briefer term, a very distinguished place among the maritime and com- mercial communities of the Continent, and from the most obscure commencement (for there is no identifi- able currency of Count Henry or of Affonso I. of Por- tugal) developed a rich and sumptuous monetary policy, which long survived the national greatness and power. Even down to the first half of the eighteenth century, when Portugal had lost nearly all her trade and her CONTINENT OF EUROPE 155 influence, the coinage continued to be of the same ambitious stamp as before, and comprised those heavy gold pieces (20,000 reis) which formerly obtained favour in Castile, United Spain, the Spanish Netherlands, and elsewhere, and which the Czars of Muscovy obtained as complimentary offerings to illustrious personages in the absence of any medium of the kind at home. Few who feel an interest in coins have failed to make acquaint- ance with these old relics of the past, balancing in the scales six or seven English sovereigns, and fast dis- appearing in the hands of refiners. The earliest autonomous Portuguese coinage was modelled on that of the Moors, and followed Mahom- medan denominations; these were the marabotin, the maravedi di ouro, the medio, the method, the pezante, of some of which our knowledge is solely derived from documents. The gold maravedi was allied in type to the dinhero of Castile, already mentioned; and of all these, and other ancient monetary experiments, which passed successively out of use, an account is given else- where. We must satisfy ourselves on the present occa- sion with stating that with Pedro the First, 1357-67, the currency began to improve in volume, fabric, and national costume; and this is another way of saying that the movement, which had had its first stimulus on French soil under Louis IX., and in Italy collaterally at Florence and Venice, made its influence sensible about a century later in Portugal, as it did in Germany, Eng- land, and Castile. The successors of Pedro I. carried on the work, which he assisted in promoting ; and Duarte I. 156 THE COLLECTOR SERIES not only developed the gold currency, but substituted pure copper for the mixed metal hitherto employed for the lower values, thus anticipating nearly every other European state in a most useful reform. Between the middle of the fifteenth and that of the sixteenth century the increasing prosperity of the country, crowned by the important geographical achievements of its mari- time explorers, brought the currency to the height of its variety, amplitude, and splendour ; and it has been shown how the magnificent gold portuguez of Emmanuel (1495-1521) perpetuated in its legends the noble ser- vices performed by Bartolommeo Diaz and Vasco da Gama for their native land. Beyond this chronological limit the Portuguese numismatic annals never practi- cally exhibited any real progress; but, on the other hand, while the national strength and rank steadily declined, the money betrayed no symptoms of narrower political and financial resources, unless we reckon as such the very frequent occurrence during the seventeenth century of countermarked pieces ; and we observe down to the nineteenth century an abundance of beautiful ex- amples of workmanship and design in all metals. One conspicuous characteristic, which should not surprise us in such a stronghold of the Papacy and its adjuncts, is the presence on the coins of all kinds of religious symbols and suggestions, bespeaking the staunch and fervid Catho- licism of the people, which has outlived everything else except its natural associates, sloth, poverty, and crime. The colonial series in this case is of exceptional extent and importance, and dates from the reign of Emmanuel. CONTINENT OF EUROPE 157 Very full information on these points is afforded in the Portuguese monographs by Fernandes and Aragao. A very striking peculiarity in the monetary system of Portugal is the almost complete absence, as in Scotland, of the seigniorial and ecclesiastical ele- ments, as the sole instance of a concession from the Crown to any person or corporation appears to be that accorded in 1128 by Affonso I. to the cathedral of Bracara, of which there exists a possible result or out- come in a coin reading Civitas Bragce ; and even this piece is of doubtful origin. A slight feature of English interest consists in the employment of the celebrated engraver Wyon by Maria II. da Gloria for the coroa of 1837 (perhaps the prototype of the Victorian coinage of 1837-39), and of the Birmingham mint about the same time (1820-30) for two pattern 10-reis elsewhere described. The heavy Portuguese copper may have been borrowed from England, from the two Sicilies, or from Eussia ; it lasted from about 1812 to 1830, and the scarcest piece is a pattern 40-reis of Dom Miguel, 1828, with his portrait. VII UNITED KINGDOM The fourth and concluding division of the work is devoted to the coinage of those races which have suc- cessively occupied and governed the region now known as the United Kingdom. It is hardly requisite to men- tion that down to comparatively recent days this section embraced several numismatic systems more or less dis- tinct from each other. England itself, from the second half of the tenth century, may be said to have pos- sessed a single authorised regal coinage ; but Scotland had its own money, at first autonomous and subse- quently of independent type, till the union of the crowns; and even Ireland, the Isle of Man, and the Channel Islands have enjoyed intermittent or partial monetary privileges down to our own time. The historical and artistic value, if not interest, of the British coinage sensibly declines after the death of Anne in 1714. The best period may perhaps be said to lie between the reigns of Edward III. and Charles II. With the House of Brunswick-Limeburg, although foreign artists were generally employed to execute the work, the style becomes monotonous and 158 UNITED KINGDOM 159 mechanical, and more so as we approach the long reign of George III. This division readily lends itself to a distribution under the following heads or sections : — British Period, Anglo-Saxon Period, Anglo-Norman Period, the Plan- tagenets, the Tudors, the Stuarts, the Commonwealth and Protectorate, the Second Stuart Period, the Hanoverian Dynasty (and Anglo-Hanoverian series of coins), and the earlier Colonial currencies. Notwithstanding the extensive, learned, and successful researches of Sir John Evans, the attribution of a vast family of money in a variety of metals, with rude types and destitute of any clues in the shape of names of rulers or of places of origin, must be considered as still on its trial, and as beset with the utmost difficulty and uncertainty. The coins usually termed British or Gaulish, on speculation or conjecture, may often have been struck in other and distant parts of Europe, and it is hardly probable that the Britons themselves produced a fraction of the numismatic remains ascribed to them by the older school of writers on this subject. One trustworthy criterion, in allocating the pieces of so- called British or Gaulish fabric to their true patria, and so at all events narrowing the inquiry, may be the comparison of the Mediaeval coinages of France, Ger- many, etc., with them, which would, no doubt, reveal the survival of local characteristics, and so assist in identifying a British or Gaulish piece as the original occupant of a German or even an Asiatic home. (See Hazlitt, " Coins of Europe/' p. 98.) 160 THE COLLECTOR SERIES It should be noted that the discovery of coins of this or any class in situ is not necessarily a sure test of local origin, since the wide acceptance of foreign cur- rencies at a recognised rate in all commercial transac- tions, from a very early period, led to hoards and finds becoming of a composite or mixed character. This circumstance explains the discovery of Carolingian money in Britain side by side with Anglo-Saxon, and of a British or Gaulish coin in Jutland ; and after all the hypotheses and theories which have been advanced on the subject, the appropriation of most of the anepi- graphic currency, and even of some of the inscribed pieces, to British ground is little more than speculative. The style and workmanship observable on the British and Gaulish money are to be distinctly traced through gradual stages of improvement, even so late as the ninth century, in the coinages of certain parts of the kingdom, particularly in the sceattas and stycas of Northumbria ; and even in the lines of a penny of Offa of Mercia we discern the archaic germ in a refined form, while, on the other hand, some of the sceatta class, even of early date, are carefully engraved and have fairly good portraits. There are very interesting copper coins of Cunobeline and silver quinarii of his brother Epaticcus. The artistic delineation of natural objects, or the successful transfer to a die of a borrowed type, was evidently beyond the grasp of the moneyers employed by the reguli of those times, as it had proved to the authors of the deplorable abortions produced in Britain both before and after the days of Caesar, UNITED KINGDOM 161 although the theory has been advanced, that in some of the objects portrayed in the ancient British currency, we ought to recognise intentional delineations of fabulous creatures.* One remarkable feature in the whole group of numis- matic monuments of British or Celtic extraction is the spirit of servile imitation which it breathes, as well as the absence of that religious sentiment which confers a character and an individuality on the Greek and Koman coinages; and this attribute equally belongs to the productions of the Anglo-Saxon mints, when the con- temporary work on the Continent of Europe presented in a conspicuous manner such diplomatic types or sym- bols as the Temple, Christiana Beligio, and Dei Gratid or Domini Misericordid, a survival of the interesting records of local cults and beliefs impressed on the circu- lating medium of the ancients. At the same time, the retention of the costume of the British coins on those of the later race may fortify our belief in the local origin of the former, from which the Anglo-Saxon pennies, sceattce and stycas would thus be a natural evolution. When we come to the inscribed series, we feel that we are treading on somewhat surer ground. Yet the fact is, that nearly all that we know about the money of this class bearing names, generally abbreviated if not corrupt, is that they are almost certainly of native parentage. Like the anepigraphic coins, they are of very unequal pretensions in respect to fabric and art, and while we read certain names or parts of names * Lady Charlotte Guest (Mabinogion, 1877, p. 288). L 162 THE COLLECTOR SERIES upon them, there is no direct or collateral clue to the region in which they were struck, or when the per- sonage specified flourished. Sir John Evans may be right in supposing that the two classes ran side by side ; but the workmanship is as unsafe a guide in fixing the chronological sequence as the place of discovery is in trying to arrive at the place of mintage. The list of rulers is doubtless still incomplete ; there are, so far as one can judge, traces of about seventeen or eighteen reguli who enjoyed, by virtue of a more or less ample dominion, the right of signing the money in a seigniorial or royal capacity. On some of the gold inscribed coins occur other initials, which may represent the moneyer or the mint, or both. The names which are least doubtful are * : — Tasciovanus or Taschof. Dubnovellaunus. Cunobeline, son of Tasciovanus. Andoco[ mius ?]. Epaticcus, brother of Cunobe- Boduoc. line. Vosii or Vosenos. Commius, King or Regulus of the Antedrigus. Atrebates, son of Bran, from Suei. whom Dinas Bran, near Llan- Amminus. gollen, appears to be named. Addedomaros. Eppillus, ) Cara or Carat. Tincommius, V * on * of Catti. Verica, i Commius. W 6Mm. Cara may represent Caradoc or Caractacus. Among the Scotish kings is enumerated Caratack, a.d. 35-55, of whom an account precisely similar to that trans- mitted about Caractacus is given, and to whom the pieces with Cara might belong; but Cassivelaunus and Cadwallader, the two other chieftains most * See Thorburn, by Grueber, 1898, pp. 7-9. UNITED KINGDOM 163 familiar to us by repute, do not seem to be known by coins, unless they are concealed under such tribal designations as Sego, Boduoc, Vosii, etc. The Latinised forms of some of these appellations somewhat aggravate our perplexity ; but in Dubnovellaunus we seem to have a sort of allied termination to that of the better known personage. We appear to be debarred from supposing that the coins issued under the authority of these and other reguli (such as the celebrated Galgacus) are latent in the uninscribed series, since they would belong not merely to the later period of British history, but to a date anterior to the evident decline in numismatic art. Of the mints we seem to hear nothing beyond Kich- borough, Silchester, Yerulam, Colchester, Cirencester (Corinium),* the place apparently indicated by the abbreviated form Sego, the capital (?) of the Boduni, probably intended in the Bodu of coins,f to which probably may be added Canterbury, if not London. But if the so-called Merovingian or Merwing monetary system found favour on the English side of the Channel, the natural result would be that every local centre, however inconsiderable, struck its own coins ; and such * Has the name Corinaeus for one of the City of London Giants any connection with this place ? t See Glossary to Bishop Kennett's Parochial Antiquities, v. Bodu. Is it possible that Bodu may be an abridged form of Bonduca or Bonduc = Boadicea ? The Boduni, however, appear to have placed the name of their chief town Corinium on their money, which would not suit the Iceni, unless there was a second place so called, no longer traceable, in East Anglia, which is rendered more dubious by the circumstance that the Gloucestershire Corinium owed its name to a cognominal river. 164 THE COLLECTOR SERIES a law might, as in the case of the large family of Mero- vingian products, readily facilitate numberless and in- finitesimal variations and gradations of type and style. There is valid evidence that, wherever the coins were fabricated, the authorities learned the utility or neces- sity of instituting by degrees some more or less strict regulations in regard to the weight of the money, and that there was a well-understood divisional principle of moieties and thirds or quarters — one borrowed from the later Roman solidi ; and a comparison of specimens, allowing for wear and tear, supports the view that what may be taken to be the money of the middle and best period was adjusted with tolerable care to the appointed standard. The Jersey find of 1820 consisted of Gaulish rather than British money, and of that in silver of low alloy ; the two classes which occurred weighed respec- tively about 100 and 25 grs. The British metrological system would be borrowed from Gaul. It is perhaps not usually recognised or realised to the full extent, that a monetary system prevailed in Southern Britain from the third century B.C. to the fifth A.D., varying and fluctuating in its character and execution between an approximately artistic style in the inscribed money and the most degraded barbarism in a large proportion of the uninscribed. There was a sufficient lapse of time at any rate to account for all the known varieties of type ; and it is now understood that, although the celebrated gold stater of Philip of Macedon was a favourite object of the copyists in Gaul and Britain, the engravers there resorted to many other models. UNITED KINGDOM 165 We have referred to the uncertainty attendant on the settlement of the original provenance of many of the uninscribed British coins, as well as of those in the inscribed series, from the habitual absence of any token which we are able to recognise as a mint-mark or note of place. The more or less uniform restriction, how- ever, of certain inscribed coins, when they occur, to a particular district or zone, may not only be taken for what it is independently worth, but for its analogical virtue in encouraging and justifying the application of the same criterion to the much larger anepigraphic collection in our hands, and consequently in claiming a British origin for a greater proportion of the entire body of extant remains. We are admitted to so scanty an acquaintance with the political vicissitudes connected with the British epoch, alike before and after the Eoman time, that it is futile to speculate on the circumstances which led to the establishment of a coinage in Britain, when it began, and when it terminated. It is of course easy to trace in the rude and often amorphous pieces, which presumably belong to the period between the latest money of absolute British fabric, and the sceatta and styca era, the old influence in the grotesque and bar- barous designs and the primitive fabric ; but there is nothing beyond guesswork to help us in ascertaining, even approximately, the date at which a marked im- provement on the best style of the inscribed British currency set in, or the causes of such a progress and change. Of the greatest power in the world, the 166 THE COLLECTOR SERIES history down to the middle of the sixth century is the most obscure from every point of view, when we have exhausted the little that is trustworthy and have dis- carded all that is empirical or false. Of the commercial value of British coins it is difficult to speak. The inscribed series is the most esteemed. The pieces in base metal, copper, and tin are abundant ; but really fine specimens are of the rarest character, especially in copper, insomuch that a small copper coin of Cunobeline, now in the writer's possession, brought £40, 10s. at the Yorke Moore sale. The gold money with Cundb and Boduoc is easily obtained. That of Verica, Tasciovanus, Epaticcus, Anted rigus, and some of the less familiar names is rarer. The small silver pieces corresponding to the Koman quinarii are particularly uncommon, and exist only of certain rulers in a few examples. These coins, in common with those of Cunobeline, are carefully executed, and suggest foreign workmanship. But the coins of Verica, of which one at least is reputed to have been struck in Gaul, have become commoner by reason of finds. Of the Anglo-Saxon money it must be predicated that the objects themselves are less interesting, from their general destitution of all claims as works of art, than the historical associations which they possess, and in many instances exclusively preserve. With very few exceptions, the symptoms of progress among the earlier rulers of Britain, numismatically speaking, were not only faint and slow, but liable to interruption; and it UNITED KINGDOM 167 was not till England came into contact with Flemish workmanship and taste, under the later Plantagenets, by commercial and other relationships, that the cur- rency assumed an aspect worthy of the rank of the country in other respects. The Anglo-Saxons obeyed the principle, so characteristic of a barbarous people, of copying every variety of model, in general with in- different success, and of these imitations there were often degraded counterfeits. There seems to be a fair probability that, as time goes on, many important discoveries will be made in this series, if not in the British. The exhumation in 1868 of the gold tremisses at Crondale, Hants, conclusively shows how near to our feet, as it were, lie the means of augmenting and revising our state of knowledge respecting the numismatic transactions of remote ages in this island, no less than the constant and intimate relationship between the English and their Continental neighbours. The coins of the Heptarchy, to our knowledge of which large and important additions have been made in recent times, both in the way of discovery and appropriation, succeeded not immediately to those of the Britons, but to a very numerous and varied class of silver currency termed sceatta, from the Anglo-Saxon sceattan, to cut. These pieces resemble the British in their imitative character, and appear to be almost invariably efforts on the part of engravers superior to those of the former epoch, yet still far from expert, to copy Roman and other types. The sceattce are usually 168 THE COLLECTOR SERIES round, but also of irregular forms, and frequently im- perfect in the rendering of the impression from the die. They occur, like their predecessors, inscribed and un- inscribed ; and there is no further clue to their origin than the sites on which they have been brought to light. Kent is the county in which many of them have been found, and Canterbury was probably a lead- ing centre of production, as it was the presumed source of the unique gold triens reading Dorovemis, men- tioned by numismatic writers. Parallel with them in the north were the singular billon stycas of the king- dom of Northumbria, a series which stands by itself, and comprises many rare names of princes and varieties of mintage ; it dates from the seventh century to the ninth (670-867), when the secular rulers of this part of Britain adopted the silver coinage, long elsewhere prevalent. But the Archbishops of York retained the system some years later. Of the South and West Saxons there are no identi- fiable coins, but of Kent, Mercia, and East Anglia there are considerable series, those of the first-named district comprising many struck by certain Archbishops of Canterbury. The earliest silver penny is attributed to iEthelbert II. of Kent, about 725 ; one of Baldred, the last king, exhibits for the first time, unless we reckon the triens above referred to, the place of coinage, DBVR CITS, an abbreviated form of Doro- vemia Civitas. The coinage of Mercia is redeemed from the normal barbarism of Anglo-Saxon workmanship by the well- PLATE XI. OF THE UNIVERSITY OF UNITED KINGDOM 169 executed pennies of Offa (757-796), which exist in very numerous types, all more or less uncommon and valu- able ; the theory that they, or some of them, were the work of Italian engravers, is at least doubtful ; but the most singular production of the reign is the imitation of a gold Arabic mancus, with Mahommedan legends, like the gold dinhero of Alfonso VIII. of Castile (c. 1193), and Offa Bex added. This piece appears to be the survivor of a very large number once existing, if it be the case that it belongs to the annual oblation of 396 mancusi promised by Offa to the Pope's Legate. But there is a second, almost equally striking, which bears the name of his queen, Cynethrith or Quinred, on the reverse. The story runs that the daughter of this princely couple died a beggar in the streets of Pa via. The pennies of Burgred are tolerably abundant, and do not greatly vary from each other or from those of his successor, Ceolwulf. There seems to be no possibility of calculating or foreseeing how much more we may learn about the present series, or what surprises the earth has in store for us. Not long since the late Sir Wollaston Franks presented to the British Museum a most valuable hoard found, it is understood, in the vicinity of the metropolis. But no recent finds have tended to make the coinage of Ethelbald less rare. Of the Franks gift Mr Grueber compiled an excellent catalogue. The numismatic annals of East Anglia extend from 690-890 ; the pennies of Beonna, the first recorded king, are rare, as well as those of the other rulers, ex- 170 THE COLLECTOR SERIES cept Edmund, specimens of whose posthumous coinage subsequent to his canonisation may be easily obtained in fine state, although that struck during his life is far more uncommon. His halfpenny, the first coined so far as we know in England, is rare. Besides the prelates, who struck money at Canterbury and York, we have pennies of St Peter, St Martin, and St Edmund (just mentioned), from the mints at York, Lincoln, and Bury ; the ecclesiastical coinage determined in the ninth century, but the monetary privilege lasted down to the Reformation, and was extended to some of the episcopal Sees. Pieces of the ordinary regal type frequently present themselves with the initials or monogram of the personage under whose immediate authority they were struck. Some of the Durham pennies of Wolsey bear T. W. and a cardinal's hat, which bespeaks them not prior to 1516. The sole monarchs of England are usually reckoned as commencing with Egbert (800-837) with whom at one time, however, a second ruler named Heahbert is found associated, insomuch as coins are known to have been struck with no other differences than the substitu- tion of his name for that of Egbert ; but the question arises, whether Heahbert may not be a moneyer's error or a moneyer's name; but Edgar (959-975) was the first who can be said to have actually reigned over the whole country ; and we know that the royal authority in the time of Alfred (872-901) was constantly disputed and infringed, and that down to the period of the Norman settlement in 1066 there was no stability in UNITED KINGDOM 171 the government, owing in great measure to successive invasions and revolts. The style and fabric of the silver penny under Egbert and his successors, however, gradually improved ; those of Alfred, of numerous types, including the London one with the portrait,* and a second with a reverse copied from a Koman aureus, are peculiarly interesting to us from the personal character of the issuer; and the profuse volume of currency belonging to the long reigns of Canute and Edward the Confessor, amounting to hundreds of varie- ties, seems to establish the beneficial growth of foreign influence and an increasing demand for specie. It was precisely a juncture when the coinage of France had de- generated from the later Carolingian standard, and under the Capetian dynasty exhibited debased types. But the Northern nations had improved their money, and it was from the Danish conquerors that England acquired the superior material and designs which distinguish the circulating medium from this time till the civil troubles under the Plantagenets. Under Alfred the halfpenny reappeared for the first time since the reign of iEdmund of East Anglia ; but the innovation may be supposed not to have met with favour, as we meet with no examples beyond those struck by his successor Edward the Elder, Eadred, Eadgar, and by Edward the Confessor. The halfpence of Alfred were unknown till the Cuerdale find; but they are now ascertained to have issued from several mints, Oxford inclusive ; one, it is * The one, formerly Captain Murchison's, and now in the writer's possession, is remarkable as weighing 26 grains. 172 THE COLLECTOR SERIES said, was found in the Thames at Wandsworth; and specimens of other reigns may come to light. The earliest Anglo-Saxon money was, like the majo- rity of the British, uninscribed ; occasionally what ap- pears to be the name of an individual occurs on the sceattas ; there is even one ascribed to a king of Kent, Ethelbert I. (568-615), with an indistinct legend ; but in course of time the system prevailed of naming the sovereign and the moneyer on opposite sides. Some- times the former is omitted, and the Normans added the places of mintage, which became under them extremely numerous. It is deserving of remark that on several of the Northumbrian pennies the Scandinavian element manifests itself in the forms Kununha, Kunuk, or Conunc, for Bex. The Anglo-Norman line closely adhered, from dip- lomatic motives, to the monetary principle which William I. found in force on his assumption of the crown ; his common PAX type followed the precedent of a Lincoln penny of Canute ; and no material variation occurred in the English currency down to the reign of Henry III., unless we regard as such the halfpenny struck under Henry II., of which an example occurred in a very poor lot of English coins many years ago. In the proclamation of 1222 against clipping, mention is made of farthings, but none are at present traceable. The very protracted reign of Henry III., however, witnessed three remarkable novelties or experiments: in the insertion in some pieces of the word Terri, UNITED KINGDOM 173 Terci, or III., to distinguish the money from that of the preceding Henrys ; in the issue of a gold piece weighing two sterlings and current for 20 silver pence ; and in the effort to supplement the penny itself by the coin already existing in France and Italy under the name of the gros or grosso = 4 pence. The latter does not seem to have been actually struck in 1249, when, according to Grafton, it was sanctioned by Par- liament ; but the gold money was not only issued, but remained in circulation many years, and in 49 Henry III. was ordered to pass for 24 pence. This highly interest- ing monument, of which two of the five* known speci- mens are in the British Museum, differed from the occasional essays in the same metal in France of anterior date in being a serious effort, which did not, however, succeed, to institute a gold coinage in England nearly a century before the actual date. With the reservation of the gold penny of Henry III., of which Captain Murchison's (previously Mr Martin's) fetched £140, the Anglo-Norman series is less rich in costly rarities than the Anglo-Saxon, although there are many pieces, such as the so-called Stephen and Matilda penny and certain rare varieties of Stephen and Henry I., with a few baronial coins, which command good prices. At the Webb sale in 1894, some silver pennies with Matilda Begina were withdrawn as spurious. But among the antecedent collections numerous difli- * When the first edition of this volume appeared (1896) only four were thought to be extant ; but Lord Grantley subsequently met with another, which he did not buy, but left to Sir John Evans. 174 THE COLLECTOR SERIES culties beset the path of the collector, and it is perhaps unnecessary to add that the most exacting figures are asked for the poorest and rudest examples appertaining to brief and obscure reigns. In this case, again, it is wiser to be incomplete, so far as private collections go. The British Museum catalogue of the English coins down to the Conquest, the new Montague catalogue, and Mr Grueber's account of the last find of rare Anglo-Saxon pennies are our best guides. In 1280 occurred a new coinage of pennies, half- pence, and farthings, of which the lowest value hence- forth continued to form a permanent feature in the English currency. Under the Edwards mints again grew more numerous, and the name of the moneyer disappeared. Owing to the increase of trade the influx of foreign money became larger, and various descrip- tions of counterfeit coin are mentioned, and interdicted by proclamation; these pieces are cited by terms chiefly corrupt and unintelligible. The acceptance of a medium of lower standard, which we conclude to have come in principal measure from the Netherlands and Luxemburg (Luxemhurghs are noticed by Chaucer in the Monk's Prologue), was obviously profitable to experts, as the English penny was of fine silver 24 to 23 and a fraction grains Tower) ; in the time of Henry III., it was appointed to weigh 31 grains of wheat. During upward of a century (1272-1377) the silver underwent very slight alteration either for England or Ireland, and until recent times the coins of the three Edwards remained undistinguished. The UNITED KINGDOM 175 Irish money of Edward I. and II. equally reads Edw. The feeling for a higher denomination than the ex- isting unit seems to have sprung from the introduction of the gros toumois into France about 1248, but the project was not carried out till the reign of Edward III., although a trial-piece of the new type is some- times ascribed to his predecessor on the throne. The former prince has the honour of being associated with the second attempt, which equally failed, to establish a gold coinage in emulation of those which had now for some time been in use on the Continent ; in 1343, florins, half-florins, and quarter-florins were issued to pass for 6s., 3s., and Is. 6d. respectively ; they were of fine gold, and 50 florins were to be made out of the pound Tower. In the same year these pieces were withdrawn, and were superseded by the noble, half- noble, and quarter, current for 6s. 8d., 3s. 4d., and Is. 8d., the half not appearing till 1346. All these monetary enterprises suffered from a single disadvan- tage, inasmuch as the standard was superior to that elsewhere employed, and they were exchanged and ex- ported. To the reduction of Calais by the English we owe, a few years after this important numismatic era, the commencement of the long-lived Anglo-Gallic series in gold, silver, and billon, among which occur some of the most beautiful and artistic examples of early cur- rency connected with the country. The salute oVor and gros d'argent of Henry V. are considered the rarest pieces, but the florin, ecu, chaise, leopard, and guiennois 176 THE COLLECTOR SERIES of Edward III. or of the Black Prince are also very valuable. The florin is of the usual Florentine type and module, and so far differs from the rest ; it occurs with the m.m. of two crowns or a leopard's head. It seems probable that the fine preservation in which we have received much of the early gold money of England is susceptible of the solution at which Ruding long since arrived, and which may be equally applicable to that of France, that it was at first a luxurious rather than a practical novelty, and was little used in commerce, the prices of the necessaries of life falling within the pieces in the inferior metal already current. It is at the same time farther remarkable that in the currency of Edward III. and his immediate successors gold preponderated, if we include the Anglo- Gallic money; and even in the time of Edward IV. the currency was equally divided between the two metals. There were no middle values. The English coinage underwent no material develop- ment subsequently to the accession of the groat, half- penny, and farthing in silver, and the noble and its divisions in gold, with the collateral Anglo-Gallic money current for the possessions of Edward and his successors in France, until the 5th Edward IV., when the angel in gold and the moiety appeared; nor were any farther substantial additions made prior to the 5th and 18th Henry VII., two very important dates, as they are those of the introduction of the first pound sovereign, or double rial, and the first shilling, coins struck perhaps in small numbers, and of considerable rarity, particularly UNITED KINGDOM 177 the latter. The shilling is at the same time noteworthy, as well as the groat of contemporary mintage, for the earliest realistic portrait of an English king. Henry continued the rose-rial or half-sovereign, which is far rarer than the former, and of which the Pembroke example fetched £205, and struck the double pound sovereign or four-rial piece. There is a very rare groat of the portcullis type of this reign, with a full- face portrait, which sold at the Thomas sale for £14, 10s. Henry VIII. in his first year struck the double sove- reign, and in his second issue (eighteenth year) the gold crown and half-crown, and the George noble and the half. There is probably no silver coin in the Tudor series, not even the shilling of Henry VII., so difficult to procure in absolutely fine state as that of Henry VIII.* The silver crown, half-crown, sixpence, and threepence followed in 5th Edward VI. ; they are of many varieties, the shilling being of two distinct types and standards, one of base silver, with a profile portrait, the other full-face of fine silver. There is a very remarkable example of an Edward shilling counter- marked about 1600 for use in the East Indies; it has a portcullis punched in on the reverse. A groat of Mary, and similarly countermarked, is extant. The shilling of Edward of the second issue, 1547, is the earliest English dated current coin, as the Perkin Warbeck gros of 1494 is doubtless a jeton ; the half-sovereign, which also bears 1547, is regarded as an essay. Edward also struck a triple sovereign in his third year, and in his * Spink