\
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
LIST OF REFERENCES ON THE
TREATY- MAKING POWER
COMPILED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF
HERMAN H. B. MEYER
CHIEF BIBLIOGRAPHER
lor sale by the
Superintendent of Documents
Government Printing Omoe
WASHINGTON
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
1920
Price ;J0 '"exits
:
::!::-
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
LIST OF REFERENCES ON THE
TREATY-MAKING POWER
COMPILED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF
HERMAN H. B. MEYER
CHIEF BIBLIOGRAPHER
112868
WASHINGTON
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
1920
n
L. C. card, 20-26005
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Prefatory note 5
Treaty-making power: General 7-37
Treaty-making power in foreign States, particularly Great Britain 38-48
Treaty-making power in the United States :
I. General discussions and collections 49-96
II. Under the Confederation 96-100
III. As considered in the Federal convention and before the
adoption of the Constitution 101-109
IV. As considered in writings on the Constitution 109-117
Considerations in respect to special treaties 118-204
Author index 205-213
Subject index 214-219
3
PREFATORY NOTE
The provisions in the Constitution of the United States concerning
treaty making have always given rise to a great deal of discussion
but never more so than at the present time. The list here presented
covering such discussions and related literature is arranged with a
view to the logical development of the subject. It begins with general
discussions on treaty making as found largely in treatises of inter-
national law, followed by discussions of the practice in other coun-
tries. Then the United States is taken up and here the grouping is
largely historical. First general discussions, then treaty making
under the Confederation, discussions attending its disposition in the
constitutional convention, and constitutional treatises, lastly a group
of discussions of special treaties arranged chronologically from the
beginning down to recent date.
The bulk of the material for the list was brought together and the
general scheme of presentation devised under the former Chief
Bibliographer, Mr. A. P. C. Griffin, who had the assistance of Mr.
William A. Slade, the chief assistant in the division. The compila-
tion of later material and the preparation for the press has been
done under the present Chief Bibliographer with the assistance of
Miss F. S. Hellman.
The object in view in the arrangement of the material is to afford
a historical view of the treaty-making power as exercised in typical
instances.
H. H. B. Meyer,
Chief Bibliographer
Appleton P. C. Griffin
Acting Librarian of Congress
Washington, D. C, September 8 t 1919
TREATY -MAKING POWER: GENERAL
1 ATbin, Pierre. Les grands traites politiques; recueil des princi-
paux textes diplomatiques depuis 1815 jusqu'a nos jours
avec des notices historiques et des notes; preface de
M. Maurice Herbette. 2. ed. rev. et mise au courant.
Paris, F. Alcan, 1912. 2 p. I, xi, 605 p. 23 cm . (Biblio-
theque (Phistoire contemporaine)
13-8163 JX172.A6
Reviewed by Amos S. Hershey, in American journal of inter-
national law, v. 7: 426-427.
2 Anzilotti, Dionisio. II diritto internazionale nei giudizi interni.
Bologna, Ditta N. Zanichelli, 1905. 2 p. Z., vi p., 1 Z.,
328 p. 23\ cm .
See Index : Trattati internazionali : p. 328.
8-36405 JX1248.A6
3 Interpretazione dei trattati.
Rivista di diritto internazionale, 1915, v. 9: 211-214-
JX7.B6,v.9
4 ■ Volonta e responsabilita nella stipulazione dei trattati
internazionali.
Rivista di diritto internazionale, 1910, v. 5: 3-46.
JX7.R6,v.5
5 Appert, G. De Interpretation des traites diplomatiques au cours
d'un proces.
Journal du droit international prive, 1899, v. 26: 433-461.
JX6002.J5,v.26
6 Baker, Sir George Sherston, hart. First steps in international
law ; prepared for the use of students.
Boston, Little, Brown, & company; London, K. Paul,
Trench, Triibner & co., ltd., 1899. 3 p. I., \ix~] — xxxi,
428 p. 22% cm .
Treaty-making power, p. 94-95; Legislation to give effect to
treaties, p. 96 ; under the Constitution of the United States,
p. 97 ; How far a treaty operates Proprio vigore, p. 97-98.
See also, in general, chapter VIII, Rights of legation and
treaty, p. 92-108.
10-17119 JX3211.F5 1899
7
8 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
7 Barbeyrac, Jean. Histoire des anciens traitez, on, Reeueil his-
torique et chronologique des traitez repandus dans les
auteurs grecs & latins, & autres monumens de l'antiquite,
depuis les terns les plus reculez, jusques a I'empereur
( lharlemagne.
Amsterdam, Chez les Junsxons <) Wtwsberge, Wetstein &
Smith; [etc., etc.] 1739. 2v.ini. front. 4?' cm .
10-16929 JX2001.B3
8 Barclay, Sir Thomas. Problems of international practice and
diplomacy, with special reference to the Hague confer-
ences and conventions and other general Internationa]
agreements.
London, Swet I it' Maxwell ltd.; Boston, Mass., Boston book
company, 1907. xix, 383, [1] p. 28 x 22\™.
See p. 137-142.
7-42317 JX1593.B3
9 Bergbohm, Carl. Staatsvertrage und Gesetze als Quellen des
Volkerrechts.
Dorpat, C. Mattiesen, 1877. 2 p. I., 110 p. 21 cm .
3-10983 JX1245.B5
10 Bernard, Mountagne. Four lectures on subjects connected with
diplomacy.
London, Macmillan and co., 1868. via, 205 p. 22Y m .
The obligation of treaties: p. 103-205.
10-10532 JX1387.B5
11 Bluntschli, Johann Kaspar. Le droit international codifie,
tr. de l'allemand par M. C. Lardy. 5. ed., rev. et augin.
Paris, Guillauminetc ie , 1895. xxxii,602 p. 23 cm . (Econo-
mistes et publicistes contemporalns)
Des traites: p. 238-203, 350-357, 395-406.
4-8225 JX1268.B45 1895
12 Das moderne Volkerrecht der civilisirten Staten als
Rechtsbuch dargestellt. 3. mit Riicksicht auf die neueren
Ereignisse bis 1877 erganzte Aufl.
Nordlingen, C. U. Beck, 1878. xii p., 1 L, 5/ f / p. front,
(port.) 23\ cm .
Volkerrecbtliche Vertriige: Krfordernlsse and Wlrkungen del
vBlkerrecht lichen Vertriige: p. 233-230; Form « 1 « - r Vertriige:
p. 239 212; Verstiirkung der Vertriige: Garantleyertr&ge :
p. 242-248; Arten der vOlkerrechtlichen Vertriige: p. 249-
252; V"ii den Alllanzen Insbesondere : p. 252-254; Aufhoren
der Vertragsverblndllchkeit : p. 255 259.
&-10741 JX1268.B4 1878
TREATY-MAKING POWER: GENERAL 9
13 Bonfils, Henry Joseph F. X. Manuel de droit international
public (droit des gens) destine aux etudiants des facultes
de droit et aux aspirants aux fonctions diplomatiques et
consulages. 7. ed., rev. et mise au courant . . .
Paris, Rousseau et c°. 1914- viii, 1209, [1] p. 23™.
Les conventions entre etats ou les traites : p. 557-631.
15-6791 JX2608.M2 1914
14 Bonucci, . Die clausula rebus sic stantibus im zwischen-
staatlichen Recht.
Zeitschrift filr Volkerrecht und Bundesstaatsrecht, 1910,
v.p 449-471.
Tr. by Josef Kohler.
JX5.Z5,v.4
15 Borchardt, Felix. Entwickelungsgeschichte der Meistbegiinsti-
gung im Handelsvertragssystem.
Konigsberg i. P>\, Hartungsche buchdr., 1906. 2 p. I., 83,
[1] p., 1 I. 23 cm .
" Literaturverzeichnis," 1 p. at end.
8-27463 HF1721.B7
16 [Buonamici, Francesco.] Dei trattati interna zionali in quanto
sono mezzi d'incivilimento. Discorso inaugurale per la
riapertura dell' anno scolastico 1878-79 nella R. Universita
di Pisa.
[Pisa, Tip. I. Nistri e c, 1878] 1 p. I, [5], 58 p. 23™.
Privately printed.
13-8680 JX4169.B8
17 Calonne, Alphonse de. Sur l'interpretation de Particle 4 du
traite de Prague.
Revue contemporaine, 1870, v. 74-' 737-74-4-
AP20.R255,v.74
18 Calvo, Carlos. Le droit international theorique et pratique;
precede d'un expose historique des progres de la science
du droit des gens. 5. ed., rev. et completed par un supple-
ment.
Paris, A. Rousseau, 1896. 6 v. 25 V"'.
Accords interna tionaux, (Droit conventionnel, negoeiations,
execution et interpretation des traites), v. 3, p. 346-404, v. 6,
p. 285-295 ; Alliances, secours et subsides, v. 4, p. 101-120,
v. 6, p. 494 ; Des traites de paix, v. 5, p. 359-395, v. 6, p. 527-
554.
10-15585 JX2984.D5 1896
10 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
19 Calwer, Richard. Die Meistbegiinstigung der Vereinigten Staa-
t( 11 \(»n Xordamerica.
Bi rlin \etc.~] Akademischer Verlag fur sociale Wissenschaf-
U n, Dr. John Edelheim, 1902. 154 V- M¥ m -
2_ii2H HF1732.G3C2
20 Cattell, J. McKeen. Outworn treaties.
Nation, May 1, 1913, v. 96: 439-440. AP2.N2,v.96
21 Cavarretta, Giuseppe. La clausola della nazione piu favorita.
Palermo, A. Reber, 1906. 236, [2] p. 25™.
8-37664 HF1721.C4
22 Cobbett, Pitt. Cases and opinions on international law, and
various points of English law connected therewith. 3d ed.
London, Stevens and Ilaynes, 1909-13. 2 v. 22\™.
Treaties and other international agreements : pt. 1, p. 7, 10, 11,
13, 19, 22, 38, 39, 86, 104, 159, 314-321; Termination of
treaties: p. 321-328; The interpretation of treaties: p. 104,
317-318, 328-333; Treaty-making power: p. 319-320. The
effect of war on treaties: pt. 2, p. 35-44.
10-20525 JX68.C72
22a A complete collection of the treaties and conventions, and
reciprocal regulations at present subsisting between Great
Britain and foreign powers . . . Comp. from authen-
tic documents.
London, 1827-1917. 27 v. 22\™.
1_4023 JX636 1827a
23 Conway, Eustace. Treaties.
(In Lalor, John J. cd. Cyclopedia of political science, politi-
cal economy, and of the political history of the United
States, v. 3. New York, 1899. p. 935-941.)
Treaties of the United States in conflict with laws in com-
mercial subjects, p. 938.
H41.L22,v.3
24 Coudert, Frederic R. Eights of consular officers to letters of
administration under treaties with foreign nations.
Columbia law n vit w, Mar. WIS, v. 13: 181-201.
25 Crandall, Samuel Benjamin. The American construction of the
most-favored nation clause.
[Nt //■ York] 1913. p. 708 723. :-'"".
•■ Reprinted from the American journal of international law,
October, 1913."
17-3U!».;5 HF1721.C7
TREATY-MAKING POWER: GENERAL 11
26 Creasy, Sir Edward Shepherd. First platform of international
law.
London, J. Van Voorst, 1876. xv, 710 p. 23 cm .
Treaties : p. 40-44, 86-87, 105, 407-411.
5-26345 JX2514.F5 1876
27 Dauzat, Albert. Du role des chambres en matiere de traites
nationaux.
Paris, F.Alcan, 1899. 2 p. I, 219 p. 24 cm .
" Bibliographie " : p. 213-215.
4-19603 JN2675.D24
28 Davis, George Breckenridge. The elements of international
law, with an account of its origin ; sources, and historical
development. 4th ed., rev. by Gordon E. Sherman.
New York and London, Harper <& brothers [1916] xxiv,
668 p. 21 cm .
Treaties and conventions: execution, ratification, interpreta-
tion : p. 223-239 ; Treaties of peace : p. 342-354.
16-16751 JX2458.E3 1916
29 Despagnet, Frantz Clement Bene. Cours de droit inter-
national public. 4. ed. complement revue, augm. et mise
au courant, par Ch. de Boeck.
Pans, L. Larose et L. Tenin, 1910. vi, H30 p. 23 cm .
Des rapports d'obligations entre les etats: Des traites inter-
nationaux: p. 675-731; Effets de la guerre sur les traites:
p. 826-827, 944.
11-29651 JX2641.C8 1910
30 Dickey, Francis W. The sanctity of contracts.
Nation, May 22, 1913, v. 96: 519-520. AP2.N2,v.96
31 Donati, Donato. I trattati internazionali nel diritto costitu-
zionale.
Torino [etc.] Unione tipografico-editrice torinese, 1906. 1 v.
25\ cm .
8-36159 JF269.D67
32 Du Bouzet, Ch. Traites politiques, de commerce et de naviga-
tion. II. Principaux traites.
(In Block, Maurice. Dictionnaire general de la politique,
Paris, 1874. 24r m . v. 2, p. 1050-1052.)
JA62.B7,v.2
33 Erich, Rafael. Uber Allianzen und Allianzverhaltnisse nach
heutigem Volkerrecht.
Eelsingfors, Buchdruckerei-Aktiengesellschaft Sana, 1907.
1 p. I., 286, [4] p., 1 I. 22<™.
" Verzeichnis der angefuhrten Litteratur ". 4 p. at end.
8-25857 JX4005.E8
12 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
34 Farra, Raphael A. Les effets de la clause de la nation la plus
favorisee et la specialisation des tarifs douaniers.
Paris, Joitve d- c ie , 1910. 209 p., 1 I. 25\ cm .
• Bibliographie " : p. 207-209.
13-13446 HF1721.F3
35 Fiore, Pasquale. Le droit international codifie et sa sanction
juridique. Nouv. ed. entierement refondue et completee en
tenant compte des Conferences de la Haye de 1899 et de
1907; tr. de l'italien par Ch. Antoine.
Paiis, A. F * alone, 1911. 2 p. I, ii p., 1 I., 893 p. 24 cm .
Des traites et des conditions requises pour lour validite: p.
384-394; Efticacite et execution des traites: p. 395-409;
Abrogation et annulation des traites: p. 410-417; Des traites
speciaux : 418-455.
11-2G963 JX1268.F5 1911
36 International law codified and its legal sanction; or, The
legal organization of the society of states . . . Transla-
tion from the 5th Italian ed., with an introduction by Ed-
win M. Borchard.
New York, Baker, Voorhis and company, 1918. xix, 750 p.
%4 cm .
Treaties and the conditions for their validity; p. 328-335;
Legal force and execution of treaties: p. 336-347; Abroga-
tion and annulment of treaties: p. 348-354; Special treaties:
p. 355-382.
18-8499 JX2881.D3 1918
37 Fish, Carl Russell. American diplomacy. 3d ed., rev.
New York, II. Holt and company, 1919. xi, 551 p. maps
(3 double) 21 cm . (American historical series. General
editor: C. II. Raskins)
See Index under Treaties.
19-8551 JX1407.F5 1919
38 Fisk, George Mygatt. International commercial policies, with
special reference to the United States; a text book.
New York, The Macmillan company ; London, Macmillan
& co., ltd. ,1911. xvi,288 p. 19 cm . (The citizen's library
of economics, politics, and sociology, ed. by R. T. Ely)
Commercial treaties; their nature, form and contents: p. 145-
160; Commercial treaties, reciprocity and the .Most favored
nation clause: p. 161-176.
15-12900 HF1401.F54 1911
TREATY-MAKING POWER I GENERAL 13
39 Foster, John Watson. The practice of diplomacy as illustrated
in the foreign relations of the United States.
Boston and New York, Houghton, Mifflin and company,
1906. 4 V- I; 401, [1] p. 23 cm .
Negotiation and framing of treaties : p. 243-261 ; Ratification
of treaties: p. 262-283; Interpretation of treaties: p. 284-
297; Termination of treaties: p. 299-311; Compacts other
than treaties : p. 312-329.
6-39718 JX1705.F7
40 Foulke, Roland R. Treaties.
Columbia law review, May, 1918, v. 18: 422-458.
41 Geffcken, Friedrich Heinrich. On treaties of guaranty. Read
at the twelfth conference, held in the Patriotische-
gebaude, at Hamburg.
London, Printed by W. Clowes and sons, limited, 1885.
12 p. 21\ cm .
The Association for the reform and codification of the la\r
of nations.
17-23712 JX4171.G8G4
42 A general collection of treatys.
London, Printed for J. J. and P. Knapton [etc.] 1732.
4 v. 20 cm .
"Catalogue of the several treatys and other publick papers
contain'd in the four volumes of this collection, in a chron-
ological order," v. 4, at end.
10-6387 JX131.G42
43 Glenn, Edwin Forbes. Hand-book of international law.
St. Paul, Minn., West publishing co., 1895. xix, 478 p.
23\ cm . {Hornbook series)
Treaties : p. 7, 35, 122, 139-154, 254, 257-260.
10-17134 JX2469.G4H31 1895
44 Glier, L. Die Meistbegiinstigungs-Klausel. Eine entwicke-
lungsgeschichtliche Studie unter besonderer Beriicksichti-
gung der deutschen Vertrage mit den Vereinigten Staaten
von Amerika und mit Argentinien.
Berlin, G. Reimer, 1905. xix, 434 p. 26 cm . (Veroffent-
lichungen des Mitteleuropaischen Wirtschaftsverein,
hft. II)
"Versuch einer Chronologie der Meistbegiinstigungs-Klausel
(1703-1903) : p. 376-434.
5-31359 HC281.M6
14 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
45 Gt. Brit. Foreign office. Return of most-fa voured-nation clauses
in ex i sting treaties of commerce and navigation between
Great Britain and foreign powers, stating the period when
terminable; and showing whether they apply to the Brit-
ish colonies: in force on the 1st July, 1903. Presented to
both houses of Parliament by command of His Majesty.
October 1903. F°.
(In Great Britain. Parliament. Sessional papers, 1003.
Cd. 1807.)
Commercial, no. 9 (1903)
46 Griffith., William. International law: history, principles, rules,
and treaties.
[London, Printed by the Hansard publishing union, limited,
1802] viii, 130 p. U\ cm .
See index under Treaties.
10-17132 JX2523.G6I6 1892
47 Grotius, Hugo. Hugonis Grotii De jure belli ac pacis libri tres,
in quibus jus naturae & gentium, item juris publici prae-
cipua explicantur. Editio nova cum annotatis auctoris,
ex postrema ejus ante obitum cura multo nunc auctior.
Accesserunt & annotata in Epistolam Pauli ad Phile-
monem . . .
[Washington, D. C] Carnegie institution of Washing-
ton, 1013. 1 v. port. 26\ cm . (The classics of inter-
national law, ed. by J. B. Scott)
With facsimile reproduction of original t.-p.
Book 2, chap. 11, De promissis ; chap. 12, De contractibus ; "
chap. 13, De jurejurando; chap. 14, De eorum qui summum
imperium habent promissis & contractibus & juramentis;
chap. 15, De federibus ac sponsionibus ; chap. 16, De inter-
pretatione.
13-5664 JX2093.A1 1646a
48 The rights of war and peace, including the law of na-
ture and of nations; tr. from the original Latin of Gro-
tius. with notes and illustrations from political and legal
writer-, by A. C. Campbell . . . with an introduction by
D. J. Hill . . . [Autograph ed. de luxe]
Washington \I>. C] cfe London, M. W. Dunne [1001]
1 p. I., v p., 1 /, vii-x, 1$3 p. front, (port.) plates (partly
col.) 8°. (Universal classics library)
Book '_'. chap. 11, "On promises"; chap. 12, "On contracts";
chap. 13, "On oaths"; chap. 15, "On treaties and on en-
gagements made by delegates, exceeding their power"; chap.
16, "The Interpretation of treaties."
1-15202 JX2093.E5 1901
TREATY-MAKING POWER: GENERAL 15
49 Hall, William Edward. A treatise on international law. 7th ed.
Ed. by A. Pearce Higgins.
Oxford, The Clarendon press; London, New York \_etc.'] H.
Milford, 1917. xl, 864 V- 2 ® cm -
Treaties: p. 7-12, 21-22, 92-101, 334-372. Termination of
war: p. 598 -K
18-5S99 JX2524.T7 1917
50 Halleck, Henry Wager. Halleck's International law or rules
regulating the intercourse of states in peace and war.
4th ed., thoroughly revised and in many parts rewritten;
by Sir G. Sherston Baker, assisted by Maurice N.
Drucquer.
London, K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & co., ltd., 1908. 2 v.
Eights of legation and treaty : v. 1, p. 288-327 ; List of Ameri-
can and English cases on the interpretation of treaties :
p. 326-327; Treaties of peace: p. 328-348. See also Index
under Treaties, v. 2: p. 667-668.
8-26218 JX2475.I6 1908
51 Hartmann, Adolf. Institutionen des praktischen Volkerrechts
in Friedenszeiten, mit Rucksicht auf die Verfassung, die
Vertrage und die Gesetzgebung des Deutschen Reichs.
Hannover, C. Meyer, 1874. %vi, 287 p. 22 cm .
Von den Beziehungen der Staaten zu einander rucksichtlich
willkiirlicher Verhaltnisse Oder von den Vertragen : p. 125-
154.
10-15580 JX2786.H3I3 1874
52 Heffter, August Wilhelm. Le droit international de l'Europe.
. . . Tr. par Jules Bergson. 4 ed. franchise, augm. et an-
notee par F. Heinrich Geffcken.
Berlin, H. W. M tiller; Paris, A. Cotillon & c ie , 1883. xv,
576 p. 22 V m .
Caracteristique des traites publics : p. 26-30 ; Traites de pro-
tection ; p. 57-58; Des traites publics: p. 188-224; Engage-
ments qui se forment sans convention : p. 225-232 ; Traites
d'alliance : p. 256-258 ; Conventions de guerre : p. 327-333 ;
Traites de paix : p. 431-444 ; Traites et Stablissements de
commerce et de navigation : p. 552-555.
4-19581 JX2787.E5 1883
53 Hepp, Frangois. Theorie generale de la clause de la nation la
plus favorisee en droit international prive.
Paris, Jurisclasseurs, 1914. 142, [2] p. 25\™.
15-14600 HF1721.H4
Reviewed by Stanley K. Hornbeck in American journal of in-
ternational law, v. 8 : 681-685.
16 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
54 Herod, Jo-eph Rogers. Favored nation treatment; an analysis
of the Most favored nation clause, with commentaries on
its uses in treaties of commerce and navigation.
Xt ir York. Th> Hanks /a to pub. co., 1901. v, 134 P- %4 cm -
1 27902 HF1721.H5
54a Hertslet, Sir Edward. The map of Africa by treaty. 3d ed. :
in three volumes and a collection of maps. Rev. and
completed to the end of 1908, by K. W. Brant and H. L.
Sherwood.
London, Printed for II. M. Stationery off., by Hanison and
sons, 1909. 3 v. maps, and portfolio of maps. £5 cm .
10-833 JX1026 1896a
54b The map of Europe by treaty; showing the various
political and territorial changes which have taken place
since the general peace of 1814. With numerous maps
and notes.
London, Butterworths [etc.] 1875-91. 4 v - maps (part
fold.) 25¥ m .
10-1503S JX626 1875
55 Holland, Thomas Erskine. Studies in international law.
Ox ford. Clarendon press, 1898. viii, 314 p. 23 cm .
( !oncerning duties arising out of treaty, Acts of Parliament
relating to treaties, etc. ; p. 190 et seq.
4-14210 JX2531.S3 1898
5G Holls, Frederick W. Treaties and promises.
\In Kuemelin, Gustav. Polities and the moral law. Tr. from
the German by Rudolf Tombo, jr., Ed. with an introduction
and notes by Frederick W. Holls. New York, 1901. 18 cm .
p. 92-122.) JA79.R8
57 Holtzendorff, Franz J. W. P. von, ed. Die Staatsvertrage und
die internationalen Magistraturen.
Hamburg, J. F. RicMer, 1887. xv, 797 p. 23 cm . (Handbuch
des Volkerrechts, Bd. 3.)
Die Staatsvertrage Im Allgemeinen, by Ludwlg Gessner: p.
3-82; Garantievertr&ge, by Dr. Geffcken: p. 83-112; P.iind-
nissvertriiL'e, by Dr. Geffcken: p. 113-139; Handels- und
Schicfahrtsvertrage, by Dr. Werner von Melle: p. 141-256;
Elsenbahn vert rage, by Dr. Meili: p. 257-315; Die 1'nsiver-
trage and Telegraphenvertrttge, by Otto Dambach: p. 317-
841; Stiiatsvertriige, betreffend Rechtshilfe und Ansliefe-
nmg, by Heinrich Lammasch: p. 843-579; Die Staatsvertrage
tiber Urheberrecbt, Musterschutz, Markenschutz und Pa-
tentrecht: by Otto Dambach : p. 581-601. JX2791.H2,v.3
TREATY-MAKING POWER: GENERAL 17
58 Hornbeck, Stanley K. The most-favored-nation clause.
American journal of international law, Apr. -Oct. 1909, v.
3: 395-422, 619-647, 797S27.
JXl.A6,v.3
50 Hosack, John. On the rise and growth of the law of nations, as
established by general usage and by treaties, from the
earliest time to the treaty of Utrecht.
London, J. Murray, 1882. xii, 394 P- 22^ cm .
10-17131 JX2538.05 1888
60 Hyde, Charles Cheney. Concerning the interpretation of treaties.
American journal of international law, Jan. 1909, v. 3:
46-61.
Bibliographical foot-notes. JXl.A6,v.3
61 Idman, K. G. Le traite de garantie en droit international.
Eelsingfors [JSociete dHmprimerie Littera] 1913. 358, [2]
p. 23\ cm .
" Bibliographie " : p. 347-358.
17-24052 JX4171.G8I3
62 Institute of international law. Effects of war upon treaties
and international conventions. A project adopted by the
Institute of international law at its session in Christiania,
in August, 1912.
American journal of international law, Jan. 1913, v. 7:
149-155. JXl.A6,v.7
63 Ion, T. P. The sanctity of treaties.
Yale law journal, Feb. 1911, v. 20: 268-291.
64 Jacomet, Robert. La guerre et les traites ; etude de droit inter-
national et d'histoire diplomatique, preface de M. Leon
Bourgeois.
Paris, H. Charles-Lavauzelle [1909] 2 p. I, v, [7]-188 p.
25 cm .
" Bibliographie " : p. 7-11.
9-30486 JX4525.J2
Reviewed by George G. Wilson in American journal of inter-
national law, v. 6: 765-766. JXl.A6,v.6
65 Jellinek, Georg. Die rechtliche Natur der Staatenvertrage.
Ein Beitrag zur juristischen Construction des Volker-
rechts.
Wien, A. Holder, 1880. iv, 66, [2] p. 23\™.
6^6469 JX4167.J3
137190°— 20 2
18 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
66 Justifiable repudiation of treaties.
Ohio law built tin, Apr. 1, 1918, v. 62: 122-123.
67 Kaufmann, Erich. Das Wesen des Volkerrechts und die clau-
sula rebus sic stantibus; rechtsphilosophisehe Studie zum
Rechts- Staats- und Vertragsbegriffe.
Tubingen, J. C. B. Mohr (P. Siebeck) 1911. xii, 231, [1]
p. 25 cm .
" Abkiirzungen " : p. x-xii.
12-33767 JX4171.C6K3
68 Kent, James. Kent's commentary on international law, ed. by
J. T. Abdy. 2d ed., rev. and brought down to the present
time.
Cambridge, D eight on, Bell, and co.; [etc., etc.'] 1878. xvi,
525 p. 19 rm .
Conventions and treaties: p. 29, 95-96, 161-162, 382-396,
495-610.
15-14611 JX2478.C4 1878
69 Kliiber, Johann Ludwig. Droit des gens moderne de l'Europe.
•J. ed.
Park, (i a HI nun, in et cie , 187 If. xxxii, 573 p. 22\ cm .
Droit des traitgs: p. 179-216.
9-lSvr,7 JX2804.D6 1871
70 Koumanoudi, Constant in. Les traites d'alliance an xix e siecle;
etude de droit international et cUhistoire diplomatique.
Paris, A. Rousseau, 1901. 2 p. I, 212 p. 25Y m .
Bibliography at the beginning of chapters ii-iv.
2-2S815 JX4005.K7
71 Laghi, Ferdinando. Teoria dei trattati internazionali. Parte
generale.
Parma, L. Battei, 1882. Ixiv, 396 p. 22 cm .
13-1 462 1 JX4169.L3
72 The law 'f treaties discussed with reference to the
Clayton-Bulwer treaty: i>. 89-162.
1-27UO- JX2542.E7 1885
TREATY-MAKING POWER: GENERAL 19
74 Lawrence, Thomas Joseph. The principles of international
law. 4th ed., rev. and rewritten.
Boston, D. C. Heath & co., 1910. xxi, 745 p. 21 cm .
Treaties, those that make law: p. 43-51; Interpretation and
obligation of treaties: p. 326-330; Effect of war on treaties:
p. 360-365.
10-26825 JX2542.P3 1910
75 Lehr, Ernest. La clause de la nation la plus favorisee, speciale-
ment d'apres les regies en vigueur en Angleterre et aux
Etats-Unis.
Revue de droit international et de legislation comparee,
1910, 2. ser. t. 12: 657-668. jX3.R4,2d ser.v.12
76 Leoni, A. Ein Beitrag zur Lehre von der Giiltigkeit der Staats-
vertrage in den Verfassimgs-Staaten.
Archiv fur offentliches Recht, 1886, v. 1:498-511.
JA14.A67,v.l
77 Levi, Leone. International law, with materials for a code of
international law.
London, K. Paul, Trench d- co., 1887. xii, 346 p. 19 cm .
{The international scientific series. [English ed.] vol.
lxii)
Treaties: p. 128-184, 237-252.
10-17124 JX2545.I6 1887
78 Liszt, Franz von. Das Volkerrecht. 9. umgearb. Aufl.
Berlin, O. Having, 1913. xii, 565 p. 23 cm .
Die volkerrechtlichen Vertrage: p. 163-172; Meistbegiinsti-
gungsklausel : p. 127-129, 132, 135, 161, 168-169, 191, 196-197,
217-218, 330, 427 ; Aufhebung von Vertragen : p. 169, 171-176,
294-296; Hanclelsvertriige : p. 163, 168, 170, 178, 218-219;
Politische Vertrage : p. 179, 295-296.
13-13375 JX3445.V4 1913
79 Lorimer, James. The institutes of the law of nations ; a treatise
of the jural relations of separate political communities.
Edinburgh and London, W. Blackwood and sons, 1883-84.
2 v. 23 cm .
Of treaties : v. 1, p. 37-50 ; Of the negotiation and ratification
of treaties: p. 260-269.
5-394 JX2548.I5 1883
80 Ludwig", Ernest. Consular treaty rights and comments on the
" most favored nation " clause.
Akron, 0., The New Werner company [ c 1913~\ 239 p. 24 cm .
13-24124 JX1698.A4L8
81 Macdonell, Sir John. Development of treaties.
Law times {London) Nov. 29, Dec. 27, 1913, Mar. 21, 1914,
v. 136: 127-128, 242, 546-547.
20 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
82 Maine, Sir Henry James Sumner. International law ; a series of
lectures delivered before the University of Cambridge,
1887.
New York, II. Holt and company, 1888. 3 p. I, 234 p.
£3 cm .
Treaties of savages: p. 13.
9-9828 JX2555.I6 1888a
83 Manning, "William Oke. Commentaries on the law of nations.
A new ed., rev. by Sheldon Amos.
London, II. Sweet, 1875. lix, 520 p. 22\™.
Of rights accruing by treaty : p. 122-130.
10-17126 JX2558.C7 1875
84 Martens, Fedor Fedorovich. Traite de droit international. Tr.
du russe par Alfred Leo.
Paris, Ghevalier-Marescq et cie., 1883-87. 3 v. 22\ cm .
Des conventions internationales : v. 1, p. 510-564; Traites de
commerce: v. 2, p. 297-323.
1-188S1 JX2951.T5 1883
85 Volkcrrccht. Das internationale Recht der civilisirten
Nationen. Deutsche Ausg. von Carl Bergbohm.
Berlin, Weidmann, 1883-86. 2 v. 23\™.
Die internationalen Vertriige im Allgemeinen: v. 1, p.
389-393; Abschluss unci Reehtskral't der internationalen
Vertriige: p. 393-407; Betheiligung dritter Staaten an den
Vertragen: p. 407-410; Aeussere Form der Internationalen
Vertragen : p. 410-412 ; Arten der Internationalen Ver-
triige: p. 413-415; Erfullung der internationalen Vertrage:
p. 416-417; Verstiirkung der Internationalen Vertriige: p.
417-423; Auslegung der internationalen Vertrage: p. 423-
425; Erloschung der Internationalen Vertriige: p. 425-427;
Anhang : Internationale Verblndllchkelten aus erlaubteu und
unerlaubten Handlungen : p. 42S-430.
11-22992 JX2951.V6 1883
86 Martens, Georg Friedrich von, ed. Recueil des principaux traites
d'alliance, de paix, de trove . . . conclus par les puissances
de l'Europe . . . depuis 1761 jusqua'a present . . .
Gottingue, J. O. Dieterich, 1791-1801. 7 v. 21" n .
Supplement au Eeccuil des principaux traites d'alliance,
de paix, de trove . . . precede de traites du xviii ftma
si&cle anterieurs h. cette epoque et qui ne so trouvent pas
dans le Corps universe! diplomatique de Mrs. Dumont et
Ilousset.
Gottinc/ue, II. Dieterich, 1802-28. 10 v. in 12. 21 cm .
10-14622 JX142.M28
TREATY-MAKING POWER: GENERAL 21
87 Martens, Georg Friedrich von, ed. Recueil des traites d'alli-
ance, de paix, de treve . . . et plusieurs autres actes serv-
ant a la connaissance des relations etrangeres des puis-
sances et etats de l'Europe . . . depuis 1761 jusqu'a
present ... 2. ed., rev. et augm.
Gottingue, Dieterich, 1817-35. 8 v. 20\ cm .
10-14624 JX142.M3 vol.1-8
88 Nouveau recueil de traites d'alliance, de paix, de treve
. . . et de plusieurs autres actes servant a la connaissance
des relations etrangeres des puissances . . . de l'Europe
. . . depuis 1808 jusqu'a present.
Gottingue, Dieterich, 1817-41. 16 v. 20\ cm .
10-14609 JX142.M3 vol.9-24
89 Table generale chronologique et alphabetique du Recueil
des traites . . . des puissances de l'Europe et d'autres
parties du globe.
Gottingue, Dieterich, 1837-43. 2 v. 20\ cm .
10-14613 JX142.M3 vol.28-29
90 Nouveaux supplemens au Recueil de traites . . . depuis
1761 jusqu'a present; fonde par George Frederic de Mar-
tens. Suivis d'un appendice contenant des traites et actes
public importans d'une date anterieure . . . Par Fre-
dric Murhard . . .
Goettingue, Dieterich, 1839-1$. 3 v. W\ cm .
10-14615 JX142.M3 vol.25-27
91 Nouveau recueil general de traites, conventions et autres
transactions remarquables, servant a la connaissance des
relations etrangeres des puissances et etats dans leurs rap-
ports mutuels. Redige sur des copies authentiques, par
Frederic Murhard. Continuation du grand recueil de feu
M. de Martens.
Goettingue, Dieterich, 1843-75. 20 v. in 22. fold, tables.
20\ cm .
10-14616 JX142.M3 vol.30-49
92 s Table generale du Recueil des traites de G. F. de Mar-
tens et de ses continuateurs. 1494-1874. Recueil (l re
edition) , 7 volumes — Supplements, 4 volumes — Recueil (2°
edition), 8 volumes — Nouveau recueil, 16 volumes — Nou-
veaux supplements, 3 volumes — Nouveau recueil general,
20 volumes.
Gottingue, Dieterich, 1875. 2 v. 22™.
Preface signed: J. Hopf.
Contents. — Partie chronologique. — Partie alphabetique.
10-14620 JX142.M3 vol.50 i-ii
22 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
93 Martens, Georg Friedrich von. ed. Xouveau recueil general de
traites el autres actes relatifs aux rapports de droit inter-
national. Continuation du grand recueil de G. Fr. de
Martens, par. Charles Samwer et Jules Hopf. 2. ser.
Gottingue, Dieterich, 1876-1908. 35 v. fold, forms. .!-:y m .
JX142.M3 vol.51-85
Table generate. Tonics i a xxv.
Leipzig, Dieterich, 1900. 348 p. 23^'\ [With his Nou-
veav recueil general de traites... 2. ser. Gottingue^
1876-1908. V. 25 ] JX142.M3 vol.75
Table generale. Tomes i a xxxv.
Leipzig, DieU rich. 1010. 483 p. 24"".
10-14014 JX142.M3 vol. 85a
94: Xouveau recueil general de traites et autres actes rela-
tifs aux rapports de droit international. Continuation du
grand recueil de G. Fr. de Martens, par Heinrich Trie-
pel ... 3. ser.
Leipzig. Dl terich, 1908-1914. 8 v. 24 cm .
10-14011 JX142.M3 vol.86-93
95 Maxey, Edwin. Rights of aliens — A study in treaty making.
American lawyer, Mar. 1908, v. 10: 171-178.
The articles adopted at The Hague conference in relation to
the rights of aliens.
96 Meier, Ernst. Uber den Abschluss von Staatsvertriigen.
Leipzig, Duncker & Humblot, 1874. xiii (1), 368 p. 23 cm .
2-18052 JX4171.T5M4
97 Merignhac, Alexandre. Traite de droit public international.
Paris, Librairic generale de droit & de jurisprudence, F.
Pichon ' f hiirand-Auzias, administrateurs, 1905-12. 4 v.
23 cm .
Les rapports qui s'etablissent entre les etats durant la paix.
Les traites international!* : Conditions de validity lies traites
Internationaux: v. 2, p. 030; Des conditions de fond: Du
consentement : p. 037-039; De l'objet : p. 040-041; De la
capacitS: p. 642 645; Negociation et conclusion des traites:
p. 045-051; Ratification des train's: p. 652 666; Effets des
trait6s: p. 667-673; Execution des traites: p. 673-678; In-
terpretation des traites: p. 678-679; Classification des
traites internationaux: Traites politiques: p. <;si <;n7;
Traites economiques: p. 688-718; Traites de droit prlvfi in-
ternational: p. 718-723; Traites de pacification: p. 723-724;
Traites portant sur des questions d'ordre public interna-
tional: p. 724-7SS; Extinction des traites internationaux:
p. 788-790.
6-5104 JX3351.T7 1905
TREATY-MAKING POWER: GENERAL 23
98 Mill, J. S. Treaty obligations.
Fortnightly review, Dec. 1870, v. 1J/.: 715-720. AP4.F7,v.l4
99 Milovanovic, M. Droit romain: Des sui heredes d'apres le
droit civil primitif. Droit frangais: Des traites de
garantie en droit international.
Paris, A. Rousseau, 1888. 2 p. I., M, 4U p. 26 cm .
2-16491 JX4171.G8M6
99a Les traites de garantie au xix e siecle. Etude de droit
international et d'histoire diplomatique.
Paris, A. Rousseau, 1888. 2 p. I., 4J5 p. 28 cm .
19-13118 JX4171.G8M65
100 Moore, John Bassett. A digest of international law.
Washington, Govt, print, off., 1906. 8 v. 2^ cm . ([U. S.]
56th Cong., 2d sess. House. Doc. 551)
Treaties: v. 5, p. 155-387. For details see General index: v.
8, p. 149-152.
6-35196 JX237.M7
101 Moser, Johann Jakob. Versuch des neuesten europaischen
Volker-rechts in Friedens- und kriegs-zeiten.
Frankfurt am Mayn, Varrentrapp Sohn und Wenner, 1777-
80. 10 v. in 12. 20\ cm .
Von Traetaten und Bundnissen : pt. 8, p. 53-391.
10-16946 JX2333.V5 1777
102 Munch, Hans. Zwei badische Staatsvertriige ; ein Beitrag zur
Lehre vom internationalen Vertragsrecht.
Annalen des Deutschen Reichs, Feb., Apr. 1907, v. Ifi: 161-
179; 266-291. H5.A6,v.40
103 Munroe, J. E. C. England's treaties of guarantee.
Law magazine and review, May, 1881, 4th ser., v. 6: 215-238.
104 Myers, Denj^s P. The control of foreign relations.
American political science review, Feb. 1917, v. 11: 21^-58.
JAl.A6,v.ll
105 Violation of treaties by adverse national action.
American journal of international law, Jan. 1918, v. 12:
96-126. ' JX1.A6.V.12
Treats of numerous instances where treaties have been vio-
lated; arranged chronologically. Bibliographical foot-notes.
24 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
10G Neyron, Peter Joseph. Principes du droit des gens euro-
peen conventionnel et coutumier, ou bien Precis historique
politique & juridique des droits & obligations que les etats
de l'Europe se sont acquis & imposes par des conven-
tions & des usages regus, que l'interet commun a rendu
necessaires.
Bronswio, A la librairie des Orphelins, 17S3. 8 p. I., 272 p.
fold. tab. 17 cm .
Des traites en general, p. 383-202.
9-23599 JX2274.P6 1783
107 Nippold, Otfried. Der volkerrechtliche Vcrtrag, seine Stellung
im Rechtssystem und seine Bedeutung fur das Interna-
tionale Recht.
Bern, K. J. Wyss, 1894. n\ 285, [/] p. 2^ cm .
" Erkliirnng der abgekiirzten Citate " : p. 283-2S5.
12-30164 JX4167.N6
108 Nys, Ernest. Le droit international ; les principes, les theories,
les faits. Nouv. 6d.
Bruxelles, M. Weissenbach, 1 912. 3 v. 25\ cm .
Traitfe : v. 2, 516-523 ; v. 3, p. 18-24, 43-48, 746-757.
12-23096 JX2702.D7 1912
109 Les origines du droit international.
Bruxelles, A. Castaigne, 189 If. 3 p.l.,v, \7~\-4H p. 25 cm .
See p. 278-294.
F-26S8 JX2041.N9
110 Olivi, Luigi. Manuale di diritto internazionale pubblico e pri-
vate 2. ed. riveduta con nuove note ed aggiunte.
Milano, Societa editrice libraHa, 1911. viii, 96^ p. 13^ cm .
(Piccola biblioteca scientifica — 8)
Obbligazioni internazionali : p. 355-428.
12-16417 JX2910.O7M3 1911
111 Olney, Richard. General arbitration treaties.
American journal of international law, July, 1912, v. 6:
595-O00. JXl.A6,v.6
112 Oncken, A. ITandelsvertrage.
{Ill Handworterbneb der Staatswlsspnsrbafton, brsg. von J.
Conrad. 2d ed. v. 4. Jena, 1900. p. 1067-10S 1. 1
Die Klausel der Meistbegiinstigten Nation : p. 1073-1074.
H45.H22,v.4
TREATY-MAKING POWER: GENERAL 25
113 Oppenheim, Lassa Francis Lawrence. International law, a
treatise. 2d ed.
London, New York [etc.'] Longmans, Green and co., 1912.
2 v. 23\™.
Bibliographical notes.
Treaties : Character and function of treaties : v. 1, p. 540-543 ;
Parties to treaties : p. 543-548 ; Objects of treaties : p. 548-
552; Ratification of treaties: p. 553-561; Effect of treaties:
p. 561-567 ; Participation of third states in treaties : p. 567-
569; Expiration and dissolution of treaties: p. 570-576;
Voidance of treaties: p. 576-577; Cancellation of treaties:
p. 578-580; Renewal, reconfirmation, and redintegration of
treaties : p. 580-582 ; Interpretation of treaties : p. 582-586 ;
Important groups of treaties: Important law-making trea-
ties: p. 587-595; Alliances: p. 595-599; Treaties of guar-
antee and of protection : p. 599-604 ; Commercial treaties : p.
605-612; Unions concerning common non-political interests:
p. 612-626.
12-9559 JX3264.I6 1912
114 The meaning of coasting-trade in commercial treaties.
Law quarterly review, July, 1908, v. 24: 328-334.
115 Paignon, Eugene. Ratification.
{In Block, Maurice. Dictionnaire general de la politique,
Paris, 1874. 24$ cm . v. 2, p. 767-768.) JA62.B7,v.2
116 Pflaum. Die Meistbegiinstigungsklausel.
WeltwirtschafiUches Archiv, Jan. 1914, v. 3: 20-36.
H5.W4,v.3
117 Philbert, V. De la liberte du commerce dans les traites de com-
merce.
Paris, A. Rousseau, 1902. viii, 197 p., 1 I. 25\ cm .
3-22916 HF1721.P5
118 Phillimore, G. G. Most favored nation clause in treaties.
Law magazine and review, Dec. 1903, v. 28: 208-213.
119 Phillimore, Sir Robert Joseph, hart. Commentaries upon in-
ternational law. 3d ed.
London, Butterworths; [etc., etc.] 1879-89. 4 v. 22 cm .
See Index to each volume under Treaties.
10-15576 JX2565.C4 1879
120 Phillimore, Sir Walter George Frank, hart. Three centuries
of treaties of peace and their teaching.
London, J. Murray, 1917. xvi, 227 p. front, (port.) 21\ cm .
" List of authorities to which reference is made " : p. xiii-xvi.
17-31431 JX5181.P5
Reviewed by C. N. Gregory in American journal of interna-
tional law, v. 12: 679-f.
26 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
121 Phillipson, Coleman. Termination of war and treaties of peace.
X, w York. E. P. Button <& company, 1916. xix, 486 p., 1 I
25 rm .
17 _o S 3 JX5166.P5 1916a
122 Pic, P. De Interpretation des traites internationaux.
Revue generals de droit international public, J an -Feb. 1910,
v. 17:5-35.
Bibliographical foot-notes. JX3.R56,v.l7
123 Ponsonby, Arthur Augustus William Harry. Wars & treaties,
L815 to 1914, [3d ed., rev. and enl.]
London, G. Allen <& Unwin ltd.; New York, The Macmillan
company 1919 103, [i] p. 21h' m .
Bibliography: 1 p. at end.
19-6362 D361.P6 1919
124 Pradier-Fodere, Paul Louis Ernest. Cours de droit diploma-
tique a I'usage des agents politiques du ministere des af-
faires etrangeres des etats europeens et americains. 2. ed.
completement rev., augm. et mise au courant d'apres las
plus recents documents officiels.
Paris, A. Pedone, 1899. 2 v. 22™.
Les traites et les conventions: v. 2, p. 461-493.
10-16278 JX1659.P8
125 Traite de droit international public europeen & ameri-
cain, suivant les progres de la science et de la pratique con-
temporaines.
Paris, G. Pedone-Lauriel, 1885-1906. 8 v. 23™.
Table generate analytique, par C. Pradier-Fodere.
Paris, - 1 . Pedone, 1906. 2 p. 1, 198 p., 1 I. 23™.
Droits accidentels.— Les traites: v. 2, p. 459-945.
6-32700 JX2725.T7 1885
12G Prudhomme, A. La loi territoriale et les traites diplomat iques
(levant les juridict ions des etats contractants ; essai sur
^interpretation des traites.
Paris, /:'. Pichon < t I >"rand-Auzias, 1910. 2 p. I, vii, 346 p.
25\™. (Bibliotheque de jurisprudence civile contempo-
raine, vni)
,_• L5806 JX4166.P8
127 Pufendorf, Samuel, freiherr von. Samuelis Pufendorfii De
jure naturae et gentium, libriocto. Editio vltima, auctior
multo, & emendatior.
Amstelcedami, apud Joannem Wolters, 1698. 4 P- I; 9%9->
[ ; | p. 24 x 18™.
.j_ 17 G40 JX2136.A1 1698
TREATY-MAKING POWER I GENERAL 27
128 Pufendorf, Samuel, freiherr von. Sam. 1. b. a Pvfendorf De
ivre natvrae et gentivm, libri octo. Cvm integris com-
mentariis . . . Io. Nic. Hertii, atqve Io. Barbeyraci. Ac-
cedit Eris scandica. Recensvit et animadversionibvs il-
Jvstravit Gottfridvs Mascovivs.
Francofvrti et Lipsiae, ex officina Knochio-eslingeriana,
1759. 2 v. front, (port.) 25 cm .
10-16938 JX2136.A1 1759
129 S. Pufendorfii De officio hominis et civis secundum
legem naturalem libri duo.
Lugduni Batavorum, apud S. et J. Luchtmans, 1769. 2 v.
in 1. 21 cm .
De Foederibus, Book 2, Chap. 17, (p. 873-882)— De ministris
obligationum eontrabendarura in genere, Book 3, chap. 9,
(v. 1, p. 425-450) — De pactics bellicis, Book 8, chap. 7
(v. 2, p. 454-461) — De pactis pacem reducentibus, Book 8,
elm p. 8 (v. 2, p. 462-466) — De foederibus, Book 8, chap. 9
(v. 2, p. 466-478) — De pactis regum promiscius, Book 8,
chap. 10, (v. 2, p. 479-484).
9-33998 JC156.P7 1769
130 Le droit de la nature et des gens, ou Systeme general
des principes les plus importans de la morale, de la juris-
prudence, et de la politique. Nouv. ed., revue de nou-
veau & augm. considerablement.
Londres [Paris] J. Nours, 171^0. 3 v. front, (port.) 26 cm .
3-23650 JX2136.F5 1740
131 Of the law of nature and nations. Eight books. Writ-
ten in Latin by the Baron Pufendorf ... Tr. into Eng-
lish, from the best edition. With a short introduction.
Oxford, A. and J. Churchil [etc.] 1703. 4 p. I, 27, [17],
lfiO, 262 p., 1 I. 33 cm .
9-22554 JX2136.E5 1703
132 QuaVjbe, Georg. Die volkerrechtliche Garantie.
Breslau,M.& H.Marcus, 1911. x,17j,p. 23\™. (Abhand-
hmgen ans dem Stoats- und verwaltungsrecht, mit Ein-
schluss des Kolonialrechts und des Volkerrechts . . .
21 Hft.)
" Literaturverzeiehnis" : p. [vii]-ix.
"Quellenvverke" : p. x.
11-14728 JX4171.G8Q3
28 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
132a Recueil international des traites du xix e siecle, contenant
Tensemble dn droit conventionnel entre les 6tats et les
sentences arbitrales (textes originaux avec traduction
franchise) pub. par le baron Descamps et Louis Renault
. . . avec le concours de M. Jules Basdevant.
Paris, A Rousseau, [1914] 1 v. 28 cm .
15-19035 JX172.R6
132b Recueil international des traites du xx e siecle . . . Annee 1901-
190G.
Paris, A. Rousseau, [1904-1913] 5 v. fold, tables, forms.
88 cm .
6-12236 JX172.R5
133 Richard, Henry. On the obligation of treaties.
Law magazine and review, Nov. 1877, 4th ser., v. 3: 91-103.
" Read before the Association for the Reform and Codifica-
tion of the Law of Nations, at the Antwerp Conference,
September, 1877. Revised and corrected by the Author."
134 Rivier, Alphonse Pierre Octave. Principes du droit des gens.
Paris, A. Rousseau, 1896. 2 v. 22\ cm .
Des conventions entre Gtats, ou des traites: v. 2, p. 31-146;
Traites de paix, v. 2, p. 145, 442, 451-461. See also v. 1,
p. 35, 37, S3, 310, 335, 348, 365, 868. 370, 374, 379 ; v. 2, 34,
35, 45, 88, 107, 109, 110, 111, 116, 120, 172, 215.
2-19974 JX3091.P9 1896
135 Rolin-Jaequemyns, M. G. Les alliances europeennes au point
de vue du droit international.
Revue de droit international et de legislation comparee,
1888, v. 20: 5-35. JX3.R4,v.20
13G Salvioli, Gabrielle. Sulla clausola " Rebus sic stantibus " nei
trattati internazionali.
Rivista di diritto internazionale, 1914, v. 8: 264-275.
JX7.R6,v.8
137 Sanctity of a treaty.
Spectator, Jan. 27, 1917, v. 118 93-94. AP4.S7,v.H8
138 Sanctity of international contracts.
Spet tator, Mar. %8, 1918, v. 120: 308-309. AP4.S7,v.i20
139 Sanctity of international contracts.
Living age, May 4, 1018, v. 297: 312-315. AP2.L65.V.297
TREATY-MAKING POWER: GENERAL 29
140 Satow, Sir Ernest Mason. A guide to diplomatic practice.
London, New York [etc.'] Longmans, Green and co., 1917
2 v. 23\ cm . {Contributions to international law and
diplomacy, ed. by L. Oppenheim)
Bibliography : v. 2, p. 363-379.
Treaties and other international compacts: v. 2, p. 172-288.
17-14175 JX1635.S3
141 Scala, Rudolf von. Die Staatsvertrage des Altertums. 1. Teil.
Leipzig, B. G. Teubner, 1898. xiv p., 1 I., 226 p. 23 cm .
No more published.
G-1689 JX2001.S3
142 Schmalz, Theodor Anton Heinrich. Das europaische Volker-
recht ; in acht Buchern.
Berlin, Duncher und Humblot, 1817. vi, 306 p. 19^ cm .
Von Vertragen und besondern Normen unter europaischen
Volkern, p. 47-70; Von schriftlichen Verhandlungen unter
den Machten, p. 70-79; Von Vertragen mit dem Feinde, p.
254-258; Von der Schliessung des Friedens, p. 259-268.
" Von verbundeten Machten, p. 269-278.
10-15584 JX2834.E6 1817
143 Le droit des gens europeen, tr. de l'allemand . . . par
le comte Leopold de Bohm.
Paris, N. Maze, 1823. 2 p. I., vj, 237 {i. e. 304) P- ®® cm -
Des tarites, et des regies observees a cet egard par les gou-
vernemens Europ§ens, p. 49-72 ; Des transactions par 6crit
entre les puissances, p. 73-80; Des traites avec l'ennemi,
p. 254-258 ; Des traites de paix," p. 259-268 ; Des puissances
alliees," p. 269-277.
10-17041 JX2834.E63 1823
144 Schmidt, Bruno. Uber die volkerrechtliche clausula rebus sic
stantibus sowie einige verwandte Volkerrechtsnormen.
Zugleich ein Beitrag zu grundsatzlichen Problemen der
Rechtslehre.
Leipzig, Duncker & Humblot, 1907. ix, [1], 226 p. 23 cm .
{Stoats- wnd volkerrechtliche Abhandlwngen . . . hrsg.
von dr. G. Jellinek und dr. Anschiltz . . . vi. 1)
7-26012 JX4171.C6S7
145 Schoen, Die volkerrechtliche Bedeutung staatsrecht-
licher Beschrankungen der Vertretungsbefugnis der
Staatsoberhaupter beim Abschlusse von Staatsvertragen.
(Eine Kritik der Anzilottischen Theorie)
Zeitschrift fur Volkeirecht mid Bundesstaatsrecht, 1911,
v. 5:400-431. JX5.Z5,v.5
30 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
146 Schraut, Max von. System der Handelsvertrage und der
Meistbegiinstigung.
Li ipzig, Duncfa r <& Uuinllot, 188$. x, 121, [1] p. 22 cm .
4-S209 HF1721.S4
147 Scott, James Brown, ed. Cases on international law, selected
from decisions of English and American courts.
St. Paul, West publishing co., 1906. Ixvii, 961 p. 23\ cm .
Treaties (syllabus): p. xliv-xlvi, lii, lvii-lviii ; (cases):
p. 412-149.
6-6913 JX68.S34
148 Seligmann, Ernst. Beitriige zur Lehre vom Staatsgesetz und
Staatsvertrag.
Berlin and Leipzig, J. Guttentag (D. Collin); [etc., etc.]
1886-90. 2 v. 2$ cm .
II. th. Abschluss und Wirksamkeit der Staatsvertrage.
6-12242 JX4167.S4
140 Shepheard, Wallyn P. B. The most-favored-nation article.
Socii ty <>f comparative legislation. Journal. Dec. 1901, v. 3:
231-237; Aug. 1903, v. 5: 132-136. JA29.S7,v.3,5
150 Sherman, Gordon E. The permanent neutrality treaties.
Yal< law journal. Jan. 1915, v. 24 : 217-2 ',1-'
151 Skelton, Oscar Douglas. Canada and the most favored nation
treaties.
Kingston, Ont.. Printed at the Jackson press [1912] 24 p.
J .'},•'". (Bullet hi of the departments of histoiy and of
political and economic science in Queen's unive rs i t y ,
Kingston, Ontario^ Canada, no. 2, January 1912)
AS42.Q6
12-4953 HF1733.C2S6
152 Smith, Sir Frederick Edwin, hart. International law. 5th ed.,
rev. and enl. by Coleman Phillipson.
London *(• Toronto, J. M . hent& sons, ltd.; [etc., etc.] 1918.
456 /: .'■>"".
The treaty law of nations: p. 141-152.
18-20321 JX3281.I6 1918
153 Stoerk, Felix. Das Ansfnhrverhot und die partielle Suspen-
sion volkerrechtlicher Vertrage.
ArcAic fur oft entliches Recht, l$9J h v. 9:23-51.
JA14.A67,v.9
TREATY-MAKING POWER! GENERAL 31
154 Tariff commission, London. Most-favored-nation arrange-
ments and British trade. Prepared by the. Tariff com-
mission, London, England. Printed for Committee on
finance, United States Senate.
■Washington [Govt, print, off.] 1911. 34 V- ^\ cm -
11-35530 HP1721.T32
155 Taylor, Hannis. A treatise on international public law.
Chicago, Oallaghan d- company, 1901. Ixocvi, 912 p. 24\ cm .
The treaty-making power: p. 362-404. See also Index: p.
897-899.
2_ 762 / 2 JX3181.T7 1901
156 Teubern, Ernst Gottwalt, freiherr von. Die Meistbegiinsti-
gungsklausel in den international Handelsvertragen.
Breslau, J. V. Kern (31. Mutter) 1913. vi, 75 p. 25\™.
(Beiheft i zum vn, Bande der Zeitschrift fur Volker-
recht)
"Literaturverzeichnis" : p. v-vi.
14-4452 JX5.Z6 vol. 1, suppl. 1
157 Thompson, Joseph P. Concerning treaties as matter of the
law of nations. (Prepared for the "Association for the
reform and codification of the law of nations," at its con-
ference in Antwerp, August, 187T.)
(In his American comments on European questions, interna-
tional and religious. Boston, 18S4. p. 132-150.)
158 Treaty-law.
Solicitors' journal and reporter, Feb. 20, 1864, v. 8: 300-301.
Discusses the abrogation of treaties by war.
159 Treaty obligations and American fishermen.
Laio times, Dec. 9, 1871, v. 52:94.
160 Triepel, Heinrich. Volkerrecht und Landesrecht.
Leipzig, G. L. HirschfeU, 1899. xii, 452 p. 23™.
Staatsvertriige, see Index: p. 451-452.
6-38456 JX1248.T8
161 Twiss, Sir Travers. The law of nations considered as inde-
pendent political communities. On the rights and duties
of nations in time of peace. New ed. [2d] rev. and enl.
Oxford, Clarendon press; [etc., etc.] 1884. Ivi, 486 p.
22i cm .
"Treaty limitations of right of self defense," p. 145-146;
" Right of treaty," p. 320-378.
16-8764 JX2582.L4 1884
32 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
1G2 Ullmann, Emanuel, ritter von. Volkerrecht. Neubearb. auf
dcr Grundlage der 1. Ann. (1898) im " Handbuch des
offentlichen Rechts."
Tubingen, J. C. B. Mohr (P. Siebeck) 1908. viii, 555, [1] p.
27 cm . (Das ofeniliche Perht der Gegenwart . . .
hrsg. von dr. G. Jellinek . . . dr. P. Ldband . . . dr. R.
Piloty ... Bd III.)
Die Staatsvertrnge : p. 247-2S6.
8_19104 JF13.03,v.3
163 U. S. Bureau of trade relations. "Reciprocity" treaties— Fa-
vored nation clauses. Letter to Hon. Boies Penrose,
chairman of the Committee on finance, from the secretary
of state, relative to favored-nation clauses in the treaties
of the United States, particularly reciprocity.
Washington [Govt, print, of.] 1911. 19 p. m cm . (62d
Cong., 1st sess. Senate. Doe. 29)
Ll_35427 HF1731.A5 1911
164 Dept. of state. Tentative list of treaty collections.
{Washington, Govt, print, off., 1919.] 103 p.
19-26327
165 The Validity and enforcement of treaties. [Their relation to
statutes in England and the United States]
Solicitor's journal and weekly reporter, Apr. 16, 1910, v.
54: 422-423.
166 Vattcl, Emmerich de. Le droit des gens; ou, Principes de la
loi naturelle appliques a la conduite et aux affaires des
nations et cles souverains, par M. de Vattel, with an intro-
duction by Albert de Lapradelle.
"Washington, Carnegie institution of Washington, 1916. 3 v.
front, (port.) 26 cm . (The classics of international law,
ed. by J. B. Scott. [4] )
Contents. — v. 1. Reproduction of books i and n of edition of
1758. — v. 2. Reproduction of books in and iv of edition of
1758.— v. 3. Translation of tbe edition of 1758, by Charles
G. Fenwlck, with an introduction by Albert de Lapradelle.
Des traites d'alliance & autres train's publics, Bk. 2, chap. 12,
v. 1, p. 308-404; De la dissolution & du renouvellement des
traitfes, 'bap. 13, p. 405-413; Des autres conventions pu-
bliques; chap. 14, p. 414-432; De la foi des traites, chap. 15,
p. 433^144; Des sflretes donnees pour l'observatlon des
traites, chap. L6, p. 115-459; De Interpretation des traites,
Chap. 17, p. 400-514. Des traites de paix, Bk. 4, chap. 2,
v. 2. p. 255-208; De l'execution du traite de paix, chap. 3,
p. L'<;;n;77; D> ['observation & de la rupture du traite de
paix, chap. 4, p. 277-2'J L JX64.C5 vol.4
10-17702 JX2414.A1 191G
TREATY-MAKING POWER: GENERAL 33
167 Vattel, Emmerich de. The law of nations ; or, Principles of the
law of nature, applied to the conduct and affairs of na-
tions and sovereigns. From the new ed., by Joseph
Chitty. With additional notes and references, by Ed-
ward D. Ingraham, esq.
Philadelphia, T. & «/. W. Johnson c& co., 1857. Ixvi, 656 p.
23\ cm .
Of treaties of alliance, and other public treaties: p. 192-213;
Of the dissolution and renewal of treaties: p. 213-217;
Of other public conventions, etc.: p. 217-228; Of the faith
of treaties : p. 228-235 ; Of securities given for the observance
of treaties: p. 235-243; Of the interpretation of treaties:
p. 243-274; Treaties of peace: p. 432-439; Of the ex-
ecution of the treaty of peace: p. 439-444; Of the ob-
servance and breach of the treaty of peace : p. 444-451.
10-17157 JX2414.E5 1857
168 Verge, Ch. Traites politiques, de commerce et de navigation.
I. Regies generales.
(In Block, Maurice. Dictionnaire general de la politique,
Paris, 1874. 24i cm . v. 2, p. 1046-1050.) JA62.B7,v.2
169 Vincent, Rene, and lildouard Penaud. Dictionnaire de droit
international prive ; legislation— doctrine— jurisprudence
franchises.
Paris, L. Larose et Force!, 1888. xxv p., 1 I., 951 p. 28 cm .
"Traites diplomatiques " : p. 884-892. Bibliography: p. 884-
885.
6-37275 JX6042.V5 1888
1 ^° Dictionnaire de droit international prive. Revue
de l'annee 1888, suivie d'une table chronologique.
Paris, L. Larose et Forcel, 1889. 2 p. I., 128 p. 28 cm .
"Traites de commerce": p. 113; "Traites diplomatiques":
p. 113-116.
6-37274 JX6042.V5 1889
171 Revue de l'annee 1889, suivie d'une table
chronologique.
Paris, L. Larose et Forcel, 1890. 3 p. I., 3-140 p. 27\ cm .
Traites de commerce: p. 127; Traites diplomatiques: p 127-
128.
10-17301 JX6042.V5 1890
172 Visser, L. E. La clause de " la nation la plus favorisee " dans
les traites de commerce.
Revue de droit international et de legislation comparee
1902, 2. sir. t. 4: 66-87, 159-177, 270-280.
JX3.R4,2.ser,v.4
137190°— 20 3
34 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
173 Vosberg-Rekow, Max. Die Handelsvertrage des Jahres 1903.
Betrachtungen and Vorschlage.
H, rlin, J. GutU ntag, 1900. ', p. /.. 128 p. %3\<™. {Schriften
der CentralstelU fur Vorbereitung von Handelsveriragen.
U- lift.)
3-10238 HF1721.V7
174 Die Politik der Handelsvertrage in ihren Grundziigen
gemeinfassli'ch dargestellt.
Berlin, Siemenroth <& Troschel, 1808. viii, 180 p. fold.
tab. 23V m . {Schriften der Gentralstelle fur Vorbereitung
von Hand< Isvertragen. in. lift.)
8-10240 HF1733.G3V8
175 Walker, Thomas Alfred. A manual of public international
law.
Cambridge^ University press, 1805. xxviii, 2M p. 22\ cm .
"The definition of the effeel of a treaty is a matter of inter-
pretation to be determined in accordance with certain well-
recognized canons": p. 85-86.
See Index under Treaties: p. 242.
8-26244 JX2584.W3M3 1895
17G The science of international law.
London, C. J. Clay and sons, 1803. xvi, [2], 5U P- ^ cm -
Extradition treaties: p. 234-285; Effect of war on treaties:
p. 326-328.
10-17175 JX2584.W3S4 1893
177 Washburn, Albert IT. The American interpretation of the
most favored nation doctrine.
Virginia law review, Jan. 1014, v. 1 : '257-206.
178 Wehberg, Hans. Restrictive clauses in international arbitra-
tion treaties.
American journal of international law, Apr. 1013, v. 7:
JU1-3U.
Points out and analyzes the special grounds for the different
reservations contained In several arbitration treaties con-
cluded up to the presenl time.
JXl.A6,v.7
17!i Weil, Bruno. Die Mitwirkung dor Volksvertretung bei Staats-
vertragen.
Strasshurg i. /•:.. J. Singer, 1006. 2 p. 1., \7\~136, Hi p. 22™.
" Literaturnachweis " : ill p. at end.
9-26483 JF269.W5
TREATY-MAKING POWER : GENERAL 35
180 Westlake, John. Chapters on the principles of international
law.
Cambridge, University press, 189^. xicc,275,[l~\ p. 23 cm .
„ Treaties with uncivilised tribes : p. 143-155.
12-40263 JX2588.C4 1894
181 International law.
Cambridge, The University press, 1910-13. 2 v. 22 em .
Treaties: v. 1, p. 59, 66, 84, 290-299, 304.
11-1990 JX2588.16 1910
182 Wharton, Francis, ed. A digest of the international law of the
United States, taken from documents issued by presi-
dents and secretaries of state, and from decisions of fed-
eral courts and opinions of attorneys-general. [2d ed.]
Washington, Govt, print, of., 1887. 3 v. fold. form.
Treaties : v. 2, chap. 6, p. 1-166.
10-6949 JX237.W5 1887
183 Wheaton, Henry. Elements of international law. 4th English
ed., bringing the work down to the present time, by J.
Beresford Atlay.
London, Stevens and sons, limited, 190 1^. xxxv, 8^8 p.
25\ cm .
Rights of negotiation and treaties : p. 364-410 ; Treaty of peace :
p. 723-733.
4-21093 JX2495.E3 1904
184 Wicquefort, Abraham van. L'ambassadeur et ses fonctions.
LaHaye, J. & D. Steucker, 1681, W. 2 v. 21 cm .
See v. 2, sec. xv.
10-34832 JX1652.W5 Office
185 Wolff, Christian, freiherr von. Institutions juris naturae et
gentium, in quibus ex ipsa hominis natura continuo nexu
omnes obligationes et jura omnia dedvcvntvr.
Hales Magdeburgicce, prostat in officina Rengeriana, 1754-
12 p. I, 782, [55] p. 17 cm .
De modo sese alteri obligandi, seu promissis et pactis in
genere, sees. 377-447 ; De interpretatione, sees. 794—817 ; De
foederibus & sponsionibus, sees. 1140-1156 ; De pace et
pactione pacis, sees. 1217-1235; De officiis gentium erga se
invicem ac inde nascentibus juribus, sees. 1108-1124 ; Pac-
tum, sees. 1084, 1089, 1099, 1101, 1194.
10-17080 JX2347.I5 1754
36 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
186 Wolff, Christian, freiherr von. Institutions du droit do la na-
ture et des gens, dans lesquelles, par une chaine continue,
on deduit de la nature meine de 1'homme, toutes ses obli-
gations & tons ses droits.
A Leide: E. Luzac, 177 J. 6 v. 16°.
Latin and French <>n opposite pages.
De la maniere de s'obliger envers un autre, on des promesses
vV ties conventions en general, sees. .H77-447 ; De l'interpre-
i. it ion, so.s. 794-817; Des alliances, sees. 1140-1156; De la
paix & des traites de paix, sees. 1217-1235; Dos devoirs des
nations les uncs envers les autres, & des droits qui en
naissent, sees. 1108-1124; Conventions ou traites, sees. 1084,
L089, 1<»!)<), 1101, 1194.
187 Jus gentium methodo scientifica pertractatvm, in qvo
jus gentium naturale ab eo, qvod voluntarii, pactitii et
consuetdinarii est, acevrate distingvitvr.
Halite MiHjth l>rr/■< **, 1908. 2 v.
War, peace and treaties: pt. 2, p. 102-112.
JN118.A63,v.2,pt.2
195 Bacon, Arthur. De l'influence du federalisme sur ['institution
des chambres hautes. These pour le doctorat.
Toulouse: V. Riviere, 1899. 203 p. 8°. (Universite de
Toulouse — Faculte de droit.
"Traites internationaux," p. 143-145; "Ratification des
traites," p. 145-154; Senat americain," p. 172-195.
196 Bagehot, Walter. The English constitution, and other political
essays. Latest rev. ed.
New York, D. Appleton tf- company, 1903. 0, [vii]-viii,
468 p. 20Y m .
Parliament and the foreign policy of the government: p. ."> I 1".
4-14805 JN125.B2 1903
197 Blackstone, Sir William. Commentaries on the laws of Eng-
land. With notes [etc.] by William Draper Lewis.
Philadelphia: Rees Welsh and company, 1897. /, vols. 4. .
The king's prerogative in making treaties: p. 230 231.
(p. 257.)
198 Bourgeois, Ferdinand. La democratie francaise el les traites
secret -.
Grand n vue, Jan. 25, 1912, v. 71: 296 308. AP20.G7,v.7i
38
TREATY-MAKING POWER IN FOREIGN STATES 39
199 Burgess, John William. ^Political science and comparative
constitutional law.
Boston, U. S. A., and London, Ginn & company, 1890-91.
2 v. 23\ cm . (Systematic series, ed. by the University
faculty of political science in Columbia college)
The powers of the Congress of the United States : Legislation
in respect to foreign relations : v. 2, p. 133-134 ; Legisla-
tion in respect to foreign commerce, p. 134-137 ; The powers
of the German imperial legislative : Legislation in respect
to foreign relations : p. 168 ; to foreign commerce : p. 169 ;
Control by the British Crown, of foreign affairs : p. 202 ;
Negotiation of treaties by the President of the U. S. : p.
248-249 ; Diplomatic powers of the German emperor : p.
276-277 ; Diplomatic powers of the President of France : p.
293-295.
4-3859/4 JC213.B95
200 Butler, Charles Henry. The treaty making power of the United
States.
New York, The Banks law pub. co., 1902. 2 v. 24 cm .
" The treaty-making power as an attribute of sovereignty and
as exercised by central governments of confederated
powers," v. 1, pt. 2, p. 191-234.
2-7104 JK570.B85
201 Cavalcanti, Amaro. Restrictive clauses in international arbi-
tration treaties.
American journal of international law, Oct. 1914, v. 8:
723-737. jxi.A6,v.8
On the nature and extent of the arbitration treaties existing
between Brazil and other states, European and American.
202 Clunet, Edouard. Du defaut de validite de plusieurs traites
diplomatiques conclus par la France avec les puissances
etrangeres.
Journal du droit international pr'ive, 1880, v. 7 : 5-55.
JX6002.J5,v.7
203 Courtney, Leonard Henry Courtney, 1st baron. The working
constitution of the United Kingdom.
New York, The Macmillan company / London, Macmillan
& co., ltd., 1901. viii, 383 p. 21 cm .
Treaties made by the Crown : p. 348, 354-355 ; Secret treaties :
p. 355-356.
1-30967 JN223.C7
40 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
204 Cox, Homersham. The British commonwealth: or, A commen-
ting on the institutions and principles of British govern-
ment.
London, Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans, 1854.
xxiv, 576 p. 10h cm .
[nternational government: p. 469-515.
9-31657 JN118.C6
205 The institutions of the English government; being an
account of the constitution, powers, and procedure, of its
legislative, judicial, and administrative departments.
London. 11. s,rcet, 1863. xeii, 757 p. 22 cm .
Foreign affairs: p. 598-599.
10-5433 JN118.C62
20G Crandall, Samuel Benjamin. Treaties, their making and en-
forcement.
New. York, The Columbia university press, The Macmillan
company, agents; [etc., etc.] 1904. 255 p. 25 cm .
(Studies in history, economics and public law, ed. by
the faculty of political science of Columbia university,
vol. xxi, no. 1)
Foreign slates: p. 151-212.
States considerations in regard to the treaty making power in
Great Britain, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Italy,
Germany, and Austria-Hungary.
4-26897 JX4165.C8
H31.C7,v.21
207 Treaties, their making and enforcement. (2d ed.)
Washington, D. C, J. Byrne <& company, 1916. xxxii, 663
p. 23\ cm .
Fart II. Foreign states: Great Britain: p. liTii -300; France:
p. 301-314; other foreign states: Belgium, Luxemburg, The
Netherlands, Italy, Germany, Austria-Hungary, Sweden. Nor-
way. Denmark, Spain, Portugal, Switzerland, Greece, Balkan
States, Russia and Japan, Turkey, Mexico and other Ameri-
can republics, Dependencies: p. 315-340.
16-6404 JX4165.C8 1916
208 Dallas, George Mifflin. A series of letters from London writ-
ten during the years 1856, '57, '58, '59, and '60. Ed. by
his daughter Julia.
Philadelphia, J. Ii. Lippincott c& co., 1869. riii, 9-264. ::.',
p. ,!■>),"".
To C. J. Ingersoll on the question, " Is there, in the making of
leagues or treaties, a clearly defined line between the pre-
rogative of the Crown and the power of Parliament?" v.
2, p. 208 210.
11-24455 E436.D14
TREATY-MAKING POWER IN FOREIGN STATES 41
209 Dauzat, Albert. Du role des chambres en matiere de traites in-
ternationaux.
Paris, F. Alcan, 1899. 2p.l, 219 p. 2^ m .
" Bibliographie " : p. 213-215.
Introduction ; 1. partie : Questions doctrinales. Chap. 1.
Modes de la sanction legislative ; Chap. 2. Extensions et
limitations de la sanction legislative ; Chap. 3. La sanction
legislative au point de vue international ; 2. partie : Histoire
de la constitution anglaise ; GSneralites ; Chap. 1. La consti-
tution anglaise avant 1789 ; Chap. 2. La constitution
anglaise au XIX 6 siecle ; 3. partie : Les constitutions de la
France ; Generalites ; Chap. 1, L'ancienne France ; Chap. 2
La constituante; Chap. 3. La convention et le directoire;
Chap. 4. Le consulat et l'empire ; Chap. 5. Les deux chartes ;
Chap. 6. La seconde r§publique ; Chap. 7. Le second empire ;
Chap. 8. La constitution de 1875; 4. partie: Etude de
quelques constitutions £trangeres ; Generalites ; Chap. 1,
Les Etats-Unis de l'Amerique du Nord ; Chap. 2. L'Espagne ;
Chap. 3. L'ltalie ; Chap. 4. L'Empire Allemand ; Biblio-
graphie ; Table des matieres.
4-19603 JN2675.D24
210 Demombynes, Gabriel. Les constitutions europeennes. Parle-
ments, conseils provinciaux et commimaux et organisation
judiciaire dans les divers etats de PEurope. 2. ed. re-
fondue et augm.
Paris, L. Larose et Forcel, 1883. 2 v.- 22 cm .
V. 1 — Great Britain and Ireland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark,
Belgium, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Russia, Fin-
land, Rumania, Servia, Montenegro, Turkey, Bulgaria,
Greece. V. 2. — France, Austria-Hungary, Switzerland, Ger-
many. Considerations relating to the treaty-making power
included in the discussions of the constitutional features of
the different governments.
9-23608 JF32.D28
211 Dodd, Walter Fairleigh. Modern constitutions; a collection of
the fundamental laws of twenty-two of the most im-
portant countries of the world, with historical and biblio-
graphical notes.
Chicago, III., The University of Chicago press [1912]
2 v. 23 cm .
16-3129 JF11.D6 1912
212 Dupriez, Leon. Les ministres dans les principaux pays
d'Europe et d'Amerique. 3. ed.
Paris, J. Rothschild, 1892-93. 2 v. 22™.
"Traites-Allemagne, v. 1, p. 511, 528; Angleterre, v. 1, p. 83;
Belgique, v. 1, p. 234 ;Etats-Unis, v. 2, p. 108; France, v. 2,
p. 378; Italie, v. 1, p. 300; Prusse, v. 1, p. 394; Suisse,
v. 2, p. 229."
1-27S26 JF331.D8
42 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
213 Dupriez, Leon. T > 1 1 mode d'intervention des chambrcs dans
I'approbation des traites internationaux qui contiennent
des derogations aux lois du pays.
L', vui du droit public et de la .science politique, April-June,
1005, v. 22, p. 431-436.
Discusses the question as it was raised in the Belgian Senate
by M. de Lantsheere who defended the thesis that u treaty
of the kind in question should be submitted to the Chambers
and acted on, article by article, as in ordinary legislation.
JAll.R5,v.22
214 Esmein, Adhemar. Elements de droit constitutional frangais
et compare. P> ed. rev. par Joseph Barthelemy.
Paris, L. Tcnin, 101 J h 2 p. I., \yii\-xxviii, 124-6 p. 22 cm .
Traites : p, 756 et seq.
15-22558 JN2597.E82 1914
215 Ewald, Alexander Charles. The crown and its advisers; or,
Queen, ministers, Lords, & Commons.
Edinburgh and London, W. Blackwood and sons, 1870. 3
p. I., [v]-vii, [/], 222 p. 18V'".
Treaties and alliances with foreign States: p. 44-45.
10-5589 JN318.E8
21G Gneist, Rudolf .von. Das englische Verwaltungsrecht mit Ein-
schluss des Herres, der Gerichte and der Kirche geschicht-
lich und systematisch.
Berlin, Julius Springer, 1867. 2 vols. 8°.
" Der Minister der auswiirtigen Angelegenheiten," v. 2, p. 912
et seq.
10-5766
217 Gorius, Fr. Das Vertragsrecht des Deutschen Reichs.
Annalen des Deutschen Reichs, 1874, v. 7 : 750-772.
H5.A6,v.7
218 Gt. Brit. Foreign office. Treatment of international questions
by parliaments in European countries, the United States,
and Japan.
London. Pub. !'u II. M. Stationery off., printed by Harrison
and sons [1912] 1 p. L, 33 [1] p. 33\™. {Miscellane-
ous Xo. 5, 1012)
Parliament Papers by command. Cd. 6102.
12-16131 JF477.G7
TREATY-MAKING POWER IN FOREIGN STATES 43
219 Hertslet, Sir Edward, comp. Treaties and tariffs regulating the
trade between Great Britain and foreign nations; and
extracts of treaties between foreign powers, containing
most-favoured-nation clauses applicable to Great Britain.
London, Buttericorth's [etc.] 1875-79. 6 v. fold. map.
26 cm .
Contents.— v. 1. Austria.— v. 2. Turkey.— v. 3. Italy. — v. 4.
China. — v. 5. Spain. — v. 6. Japan.
4-17S49 JX636 1875
220 Laband, Paul. Le droit public de l'Empire allemand. Ed.
franchise rev. et mise au courant de la derniere legisla-
tion par l'auteur.
Paris, V. Giard & E. Brieve, 1900-04. 6 v. %%\™. (Biblio-
theque international e de droit public)
Les traites internationaux : Definition et nature juridique : v. 2,
p. 436-447; Conclusion des traites internationaux: p. 447-
483 ; De la validity des traites internationaux : au point
de vue du droit public : p. 484-504 ; Foot-note references.
15-7227 JN3423.L3,v.2
221 Lapradelle, A. de. Le Parlement et les traites d'alliance.
Revue du droit public et de la science politique, Oct -Dec,
1904, v. 21:843-845.
On the Franco-Russian alliance. JAll.R5,v.21
222 Lee, Sidney. The prime minister and the crown.
Spectator, Jan. 3, 1903, v. 90: 12-13. AP4.S7,v.90
223 Michon, Louis. Les traites internationaux devant les chambres.
Paris, A. Chevalier-Marescq & C ie , 1901. 3 p. I., 520 p.
23 cm .
Reviews the history of the role played by the assemblies of
France in the treaty-making power, and gives an exposition
of the power as it now exists under the French constitution
of 1875. A chapter is devoted to the role of chambers as
to treaties in foreign constitutions, under four heads,
namely: 1. Constitution not requiring the sanction of the
legislative power for the conclusion of a treaty (England) ;
2. Constitutions requiring the sanction of the legislative
power for certain treaties (Belgium, Italy, Austria, Ger-
many, Spain, Netherlands) ; 3. Constitutions requiring the
sanction of the legislative power for all treaties (United
States). The true r61e that chambers should play in the
treaty-making power is the subject considered in the fourth
and last chapter.
8-8752 JN2809.M6
44 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
224 Moore, "William Harrison. Act of state in English law.
London, •/. Murray, 1006. xi, 178 p., 1 1. 23 rm .
"The execution of the treaties", ]>. 84-92; "Aliens", p. 93-99;
"Direct external relations of state*." p. 100-114; "Civil
discord in foreign countries", p. Iir>-il9; "Acts under the
authority of a foreign sovereign", p. 120-131 ; "Treaties ;is
sources <>t" right", p. 132-135; "Treaties in relation to con-
tracts jiikI private debts", p. 136-138; "Discharge of obliga-
tions by the authority of a foreign sovereign", p. 139-145;
"Actions by foreign sovereigns", p. 14G-156; "Succession to
state rights and liabilities", p. 157-178.
7-1M75
225 Moreau, Felix Pierre Louis. Precis elementaire de droit con-
stitutionnel (organisation des pouvoirs publics et libertes
publiques) 8. ed., completement rev.
Paris, L. Tenin, 1917. 3 p. I., 627 p. 18 cm .
Traites. p. 369 372.
19-229 JN2597.M7 1917
22G Ottley, Henry. On the errors and mischiefs of modern diplo-
macy, as based upon the assumed prerogative of the crown
in matters of peace and war; with particular reference
to the treaty of Washington of 1871, and the negociations
connected with it, down to the adjournment of the Tri-
bunal of arbitration on the 28th June.
London, Chapman and Hall, 1872. viii, 188 p. 10 cm .
Denies "the so-called prerogative of the crown to regulate at
its discretion, under the advice of its .Ministers for the time
being, all matters of peace and war, and other international
agreements with foreign states."
10-1G5S0 JX238.A7 1872h
227 Pierre, Eugene. Traite de droit politique electoral et parlemen-
taire. 3. ed. contenant des references au Supplement.
Paris, I m pi. Motteros et Martinet, 1908. xvi, llfid, \2\ p.
25{"". JN2791.P5 1908
Supplement. 2. ed. entierement refondue.
Paris, Librairies-imprimeries reunis, 1910. xxxix, 1049 p.,
1 I %5\ cm .
Traites Internationaux. Comment aegocies et ratifies, autre-
fois, par. 546; aujourd'hui: 547; A I'Stranger: 548; definition
des traites soumis n la ratification des Chambres: 549; le
Pouvoir legislatif a'a pas ],. droil de lier d'avance le Pouvoir
executif: 550, 551 ; deliberation sur les traites, 863 et suiv. ;
reproducti I'un traite rejete: 70; regies speciales A la
promulgation des traites: 5UU; cas d'arbltrage diplo-
matique: 02.
12-25725 t; JN2791.P6 1910
TREATY-MAKING POWER IN FOREIGN STATES 45
228 Ratification of treaties; methods and procedure in foreign
countries relative to the ratification of treaties, also ex-
tracts from the executive Journal of the Senate relative to
proceedings in cases of treaties rejected by the Senate.
Washington, Govt. print, off., 1919. 280 p. incl. forms.
23 cm . ([U. #.] 66th Cong., 1st sess. Senate. Doc. 26)
19-26500 JN4171.R3R3
229 Robinet de Clery. Des conditions de validite des traites diplo-
matiques dans l'etat actuel de notre legislation.
Journal du droit international prive, 1876, v. 3: 343-31f9,
U7-453.
JX6002.J5,v.3
230 Stephen, Henry John. Mr. Serjeant Stephen's New commen-
taries on the laws of England (partly founded on
" Blackstone.") 15th ed. Under the general editorship
of Edward Jenks.
London, Butterworth d- co., 1908. 4 v. fold. tab. 22 cm .
The King's prerogative to make treaties, etc. : v. 2, p. 567-568.
9-9362
231 Todd, Alpheus. On parliamentary government in England : its
origin, development, and practical operation.
London, Longmans, Green, and co., 1867-69. 2 v. 22\ cm .
The right of making treaties : v. 1, p. 609-614.
10-7253 JN508.T7
232 Parliamentary government in England : its origin, develop-
ment, and practical operation. New ed., abridged and
rev. by Spencer Walpole.
London, S. Low, Mars ton & company, limited, 1892. 2 v.
19\ cm .
Treaty making power : v. 1, p. 132-137.
10-5481 JN121.T7
233 Traill, Henry Duff. Central government. Rev. and cor. by
Sir Henry Craik.
London, Macmillan and co., limited, 1908. x, 165 p. 19\ cm .
{The English citizen: his rights and responsibilities.)
Direction and control of foreign affairs : p. 74 et seq.
9-18926 JN421.T72
234 Treaty-making power and the empire.
Law journal, June 11, 1910, v. 4^: 386.
Effect in developing an imperial constitution in Great Britain.
46 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
235 Twiss, Sir Travers. On the treaty-making power of the
Crown: " Le Parlement Beige."
Law magazim and n oiew, May 1879, l^th ser., v. 4: 257-
m.
230 U. S. 58th Cong., 3d sess., 1904-1905. Senate. Constitutional
met hods of making and ratifying treaties in certain for-
eign countries, and also list of arbitration treaties and
conventions submitted to and acted upon by the Senate.
February 14. 1905. — Presented by Mr. Lodge and or-
dered to be printed. February 20, 1905. — Ordered re-
printed with additions.
[Washington, GovH print, off., 190-5] 9 p. 23 cm . (58th
( 'ong., 3d sess. Senate. Doc. 158)
G-11S36 Serial no. 4766
237 1>< j>t. of state. The treaty-making power in various
countries. A collection of memoranda concerning nego-
tiation, conclusion, and ratification of treaties and con-
ventions, with excerpts from fundamental laws of vari-
ous countries.
Washington, GovH print, off., 1919. 89 p.
19-26415
238 Vogels, Aloys. Die staatsrechtliche Stellung der Bundesrats-
bevollniachtigten.
Tubingen, J. ('. B. Mohr (P. Si, luck) 1911. viii, 103 p.
X!iY m . ( Ablui niUungen aus dem Stoats-, verwaltungs-
nitd collar ncht . . . [bd.'\ vn [hft.] 5)
" Literaturverzeichnis " : p. vii-viii.
11-12119 JN3638.V7
239 Walpole, Sir Spencer. Foreign relations.
London, MacmUlan and co., 1882. 3 p. I., 162 p. 20 cm . {The
English citizen: his rights and responsibilities)
8-18500 DA45.W3
240 Zorn, Ph. Die Deutschen Staatsvertrage.
Zeitschrift fur du gesammU Staatswissenschaft, 1880, v. 36:
1-39.
H5.Z4,v.36
GREAT BRITAIN: COLONIES
211 Canada and the treaty-making power.
Spectator, J an. .'. 1904, v 92:7, AP4.s7,v.92
TREATY-MAKING POWER IN" FOREIGN STATES 47
242 De Sumichrast. Independence and the treaty making power.
Canadian magazine, May, 1904, v. 23: 26-31. AP5.C2,v.23
243 Hodgins, Thomas. Canada and the treaty-making power.
Canadian magazine, Mar. 190 % v. 22: 479-482.
Formulates a claim " for enlarged treaty-making powers 'sub-
ject to the veto of the Sovereign.' " AP5.C2,v.22
244 Keith, Arthur Berriedale. Foreign policy and the democracies
of the empire.
Society of comparative legislation. Journal, Apr. 1918, v.
18: 47-57. JA29.S7,v.l8
245 Imperial unity and the dominions.
Oxford, Clarendon press, 1916. 626 p. 23 cm .
Suggested concession of treaty power to Dominions : p. 270-
276.
16-12260 JV1062.K35
246 Responsible government in the dominions.
Oxford, The Clarendon press, 1912. 3 v. 22\ cm .
Treaty relations : v. 3, p. 1101-1157.
12-15473 JV1062.K4 1912
247 Macdonnel, John. Dominions and treaty making powers.
Law times, June 1, 8, 1918, v. 145: 101-102, 116-117.
248 Skelton, O. D. Canada and the most favored nation treaties.
Queen's quarterly, Jan.-Mar. 1912, v. 19: 231-252.
AP5.Q3,v.l9
249 Smith, Goldwin. Can Canada make her own treaties?
Canadian magazine, Feb. 1904, v. 22: 331S35.
AP5.C2,v.22
250 Stuart-Linton, Charles E. T. The colonies and treaty powers.
Empire review, Feb. 1904, v. 7 : 94-96. daio.E5,v.7
251 Todd, Alpheus. Parliamentary government in the British
colonies. 2d ed., edited by his son.
London and New York, Longmans, Green, and co., 1894-
xx, 929 p. 23 cm .
Treaties, affecting Chinese immigration, p. 187-196 ; affecting
colonist trade, p. 228 ; extension of treaty privileges to
colonies, p. 265. See also " Imperial dominion exercisable
over self-governing colonies; in foreign relations; and
through the operation of treaties," treaty-making powers,
etc., p. 247-300.
9-32115 JV1062.T64
48
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
252 Tupper, Sir C. ffibbert. Treaty-making powers of the Do-
minions.
Society of comparative legislation. Journal Jan 1917 v
17: 5 18. ' '
An historical review of the development of the treaty-making
power of Canada.
JA29.S7,v.l7
TREATY-MAKING POWER IN THE UNITED STATES
I.-GENERAL DISCUSSIONS AND COLLECTIONS
253 Abbott, Lyman. The power of the government to make a
general arbitration treaty.
(In Lake Mohonk conference on international arbitration,
11th report, 1905. p. 68-71. Lake Mohonk, 1905. 22$°™.)
JX1932.L3 1905
254 Adams, John Quincy, pres. U. S. Memoirs of John Quincy
Adams, comprising portions of his diary from 1795 to
1848. Ed. by Charles Francis Adams.
Philadelphia, J. B. Lippincott & co., 1874.-77. 12 v.
fronts, {v. 1,3,8) 25 cm .
The President, the Senate, and the Florida treaty, 1821, v. 5,
page 285. Also " the disposition of the President ... to
consult them [i. e. the Senate] whenever there is any
plausible Constitutional motive for so doing."
4-20138 E377.A19
255 Alger, George W. The states and national treaties.
Independent, Apr. 29, 1909, v. 66: S90S93. AP2.l53,v.66
25G America and arbitration.
(In The Outlook, London, Feb. 18, 1905, v. 15: p. 215-216.)
"The fact is that what drove the Senate to act as it did in
1897 and again last Saturday was, beyond everything else,
the primal instinct of self-preservation. The Constitution
lodges in the Senate the right to a final voice in the conduct
of foreign affairs; all treaties, to be effective, must be
ratified by a two-thirds majority of the Senators present.
And that is a prerogative which the Senate has not the
least intention of relinquishing."
AP4.08,v.l5
257 Anderson, Chandler P. The extent and limitations of the
treaty-making power under the Constitution.
[New York Pub. for the American society of international
law, by Baker, Voorhis & co., 1907] \636\-670 p. 27™.
Reprinted from the American journal of international law
for July, 1907, v. 1. d. 636-670.
10-15261 JX570.A6
258 The arbitration treaties: precedents; a chapter of history; only
a word; the Senate.
Outlook, Feb. 25-Mar. 25, 1905, v. 79: 472-475, 515-519,
622-625, 672-675, 727-730. AP2.08,v.79
137190°— 20 1 49
50 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
259 Bacon, Augustus < ). The treaty-making power of the President
and the Senate.
North Ann rican n vu w, Apr. 1906, v. 182: 502 ~>12.
AP2.N7,v.l82
260 Baldwin, Simeon E. Schooling rights under our treaty with
Japan.
Columbia law n vu w, Feb. 1907, v. 7:85-92.
201 Barrett, James T. International agreements without the advice
and consenl of the Senate.
Yali law journal, Nov. 1905, v. 15: 18-27.
262 Bascom, John. Growth of nationality in the United States; a
social study.
Nt w York & London. G. P. Putnam's sons, 1899. ix, 213 p.
JO"".
•• strife between departments: Formation of treaties:" p. 123-
125.
Jan. is. 1900-11 E179.B29
203 Bellot, II. II. L. Treaty-making power in the United States
and the growth of the executive.
Law times, Aug. 21, 1909, v. 127: 384 386.
20-1 Big"elow, John. Breaches of Anglo-American treaties; a study
in history and diplomacy.
N( w York, Sturgis <(■ Walton company, 1917. lp. I., v-xi,
2Jp8 p. Hi fold. maps. !!/}/'».
Bibliography: p. 233 236.
17-11357 JX1428.G7B5
205 Bikle, Henry Wolf. The constitutional power of Congress over
the territory of the United States.
| Philadi Iphia, . 1 ml printing co., 1901] x, 11-120 p. 21f m .
( Univi rsity of Pt nnsylvania. Puhl tent ions of I Jo I>< part-
mt nt of law )
" issued as a supplemenl to the American law register Cor
August, 1901."
The treaty-making power as a source of the power to acquire
territory : p. 16 18.
1 23280 JK1081.B5
20fl Bird, C. B. Righl of states to pass local laws in conflict with
foreign powers.
Cas( and comment, Sept. 1917, v. 24: 200-296.
TREATY-MAKING POWER IN THE UNITED STATES 51
207 Boyd, James. H. Limitations of the treaty-making power of
the president of the United States with the concurrent
power of the Senate.
Central law journal, Mar. '"'. (Studies in history, economics and public law,
ed. hy the faculty of political science of Colombia uni-
versity, vol. xxi, no. 1)
"The United States": p. 19-150.
4-26897 JX4165.C8
H31.C7,v.21
285 Treaties, their making and enforcement. (2d ed.)
Washington, D. C, •/. Byrne c& company, I'd It), xxxii,
663 p. Jd\'"'.
Contents. — Introduction; Pt. 1. The United States: Div. I.
Prior to the Constitution: Prior to the Articles of Confed-
eration; Under the Articles of Confederation; The Federal
convention; Discussion preceding the adoption of the Con-
stitution. Div. II. Under the Constitution: I. The mak-
ing: The advice and consent of the Senate; Powers of the
President ; Agreements reached hy the executive without
the advice and consent of the Senate: Agreements reached
by the executive in virtue of Acts of Congress; Agreements
entered into by states of the union. II. The execution or
enforcement: Operation of treaties as municipal law;
Treaties involving an appropriation; Treaties involving a
modification of the revenue laws; Treaties for the acquir-
ing and cession of territory; Legislation to give effect to
Various other treaties; Treaties Involving subjects other-
wise under the control of the individual states; Jurisdic-
tion of federal courts; Pt. II. Foreign states. Pt. III.
The operation of treaties as between states: Date of taking
effect: Determination of disputed interpretations of
treaties; Aids in the interpretation of treaties; The Ameri-
can construction of the Most-favored-nat ion clause; Ter-
mination of treaties. Appendix I. A digest of decisions of
American courts construing treaties arranged by countries
and treaties; Appendix II. Forms. Index.
16-6404 JX4165.C8 1916
Reviewed hy Charles Henry Butler in American journal of
international law, v. 10: 675-676. JXl.A6,v.lO
286 Croswell, Simon Greenleaf. The treaty-making power under
the Constitution.
Ann rican law review, July-Aug. 1886, v. 20: 513-527.
Upholds the validity of commercial treaties. Reviews the
history of the clauses in the Constitution respecting
treaties and commerce; Citing Wayne, J. in Oldtield V.
Marriott. LO How., 14G in the regulation of trade by Con-
gress and cites in defence of the view "that the treaty-
TREATY-MAKING POWER IN THE UNITED STATES 55
making power confided to the President and Senate covers
commercial treaties," the following cases and references:
Taney, C. J. in Holmes v. Jennison, 14 Pet. 519, United
States r. Forty-three Gallons, 93 U. S., 196, Story on Const.,
sec. 1508; Taylor v. Morton, 2 Curtis, 454 (Tariff of 1842
5 Stat, at L., 54S) ; Foster v. Neilson, 2 Pet. 314; Scott v.
Sandford, 19 How., 629; Ropes v. Clinch. 8 Blatehf. C. C.
304 ; Bartram v. Robertson, 15 Fed. Rep. 112, 212 ; Edge v.
Robertson, 18 Fed. Rep., 135.
287 Cullom, S. M. The treaty-making power.
North American review, Mar. 1905, v. ISO: 335-31^6.
Upholds the constitutional right of the Senate to make reci-
procity treaties. AP2.N7.V.180
288 Currey, John. State v. Treaty rights.
Lawyer and hanker, Feb. 1913, v. 6: 6-16.
Chicago legal news, Feb. 22, 1913, v. 45:226-228.
289 dishing, Caleb. Droit d'aubaine. The government of the
United States has constitutional power to enter into treaty
stipulations with foreign governments, for the purpose of
restricting or abolishing the property disabilities of aliens
or their heirs in the several States. Feb. 26, 1857.
(In U. S. Dept. of justice. Official opinions of the Attorneys
general, v. 8, comp. by C. Cushing, p. 411-418. Washing-
ton, 1858.)
290 D., A. J. The treaty-making power. Can the President and
Senate set aside the law and establish free-trade ?
American economist, Feb. 7, 1902, v. 29: 62-63.
HC101.A5,v.29
291 [Davis, J. C. Bancroft.] Notes upon the foreign treaties of the
United States; with some references to negotiations pre-
ceding them ; to the executive, legislative, or judicial con-
struction of them ; and to the causes of the abrogation of
some of them.
(In U. S. Treaties, etc. Treaties and conventions con-
cluded between the United States of America and other
powers, since July 4, 1776. Rev. ed., p. 927-1082. Wash-
ington, 1873.) JX236 1873
(Also appears as Senate ex. doc. no. 36, 41st Cong., 3d sess.
(Serial no. 1441). Some incomplete copies of the first edi-
tion of this compilation, without the notes and indexes, got
into circulation. The notes and indexes were also issued in
separate form.)
The treaty-making power, p. 931-944 ; Constructions by the
attorneys-general and courts of the United States, p. 941-
942 ; Discussions in Congress of the treaty power under the
Constitution, p. 942-944.
56 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
292 [Davis, J. C. Bancroft.] Xotes upon the foreign treaties of
the United States; with some references to negotiations
preceding them; to the executive, legislative, or judicial
construction of them ; and to the causes of the abrogation
of some of them.
(In V. S. Treaties, etc. Treaties and conventions concluded
between the United States of America and other powers
since July 4, 177G, p. 1217-140G. Washington, 18S9.)
JX236 1889
(Also appears as Senate ex. doc. no. 47, 48th Cong., 2d sess.)
Serial no. 2262
Discussion of the treaty-making power in Introductory note,
p. 1219-1230; Constructions by the attorneys-general and
courts of the United States, p. 1227-1229; Discussions in
Congress of the treaty power under the Constitution, p.
1229-1230.
293 Treaties of the United States.
(In Lalor, John J. ed. Cyclopaedia of political science, politi-
cal economy, and of the political history of the United
States, v. 3, p. 944-949. New York, 1899. 8°.)
H41.L22,v.3
294 Devlin, Robert Thomas. The treaty power under the Constitu-
tion of the United States. Commentaries on the treaty
clauses of the Constitution ; construction of treaties ; extent
of treaty-making power; conflict between treaties and
acts of Congress, state constitutions and statutes; inter-
national extradition; acquisition of territory; ambassa-
dors, consuls and foreign judgments: naturalization and
expatriation; responsibility of government for mob vio-
lence, and claims against governments. With appendices
containing regulations of Department of state relative to
extradition of fugitives from justice, a list of the treaties
in force, with the international conventions and acts to
which the United States is a party, and a chronological
list of treaties.
San Francisco, Bancroft-Whitney company, 1908. hex, 864
p. 23\ cm .
8-2052!) JK570.D5
295 Displacement of state laws by treaties.
Columbia law review, Bee. 191 4, v. 1J+: 067-669.
Note in re D'Adamo's estate, (1914) 212 N. Y. 214, regarding
a citizen of Sweden dying intestate Holds that the treaty
is supreme law of the land.
296 Duwalt, G. W. The treaties of the United States and alien
land laws of Illinois and other states of the Union.
Central law journal, Sept. 11. 1896, v. 1$: 211-
TREATY-MAKING POWER IN THE UNITED STATES 57
297 E. Unconstitutional treaties. To D. Art. II of the twentieth
no. of the Jurist. Have the courts of the United States
the power to declare an article of a treaty unconstitu-
tional and therefore null and void?
American jurist, Apr. 1834, v. 11 : 805-308.
..." the nature of treaties, the interests involved, the
emergencies that frequently arise, and good faith between
nations, all require that they should be paramount to all
other laws."
298 Eliot, Edward C. The treaty-making power, with reference to
the reserved power of the states.
Case and comment, July, 1913, v. 20: 77-83.
299 Elliot, Jonathan, comp. The American diplomatic code, em-
bracing a collection of treaties and conventions between
the United States and foreign powers : from 1778 to 1834.
With an abstract of important judicial decisions, on
points connected with our foreign relations. Also, A
concise diplomatic manual, containing a summary of the
law of nations, from the works of Wicquefort, Martens,
Kent, Vattel, Ward, Story, &c. &c.
Washington, Printed by J. Elliot, jun., 183 % 2 v. 23\™.
10-15057 JX231.E6
300 Diplomatic code of the United States of America : em-
bracing a collection of treaties and conventions between
the United States and foreign powers, from the year 1778
to 1827.
Washington, Printed by J. Elliot, junior, 1827. 2 p. I.,
\xxi\-xxv, [26]-6G8 p. 21f m .
9-10564 JX231.E58
301 Elliott, Charles B. The treaty-making power.
Forum, July, 1899, v. 27: 592-601 AP2.A8,v.27
302 Evarts, William M. The revenue bill. Speech in the Senate,
Sept. 8, 1890.
Congressional record, 51st Congress, 1st session, v. 21, pt.
10: 9882-9883.
On the reciprocity feature of the McKinley law " Can Sena-
tors offer an argument that, under our Constitution, this
demission by Congress and this vesting it in the President
is not placing in him the power to make a treaty, or a
quasi-treaty, or an arrangement in that nature, without
the Senate; or to raise revenue or remit it without the
action of the House of Representatives, with which that
power under the Constitution must originate"? page 9882.
Jll.Fv5,v.21,pt.lO
58 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
303 Fairlie, John A. The administrative powers of the President.
Part II. Special administrative powers.
Michigan law r> vit w, Jan. 1904, v. 2:21+7-259.
Foreign relations, p. L'47-2.~>0.
304 The Federalist. The Federalist: a collection of essays, writ-
ten in favor of the new Constitution, as agreed upon by
the Fcederal convention. September IT, 1787. Reprinted
from the original text. Under the editorial supervision
of Henry B. Dawson.
X, w York, Scrlbner, Armstrong, and co., 1876. Ivi, 61~> p.
21Y m .
7-10708 JK154 1876
305 The Federalist; a commentary on the Constitution of
the United States, by Alexander Hamilton, James Madi-
son, and John Jay. Ed., with notes, illustrative docu-
ments, and a copious index, by Paul Leicester Ford.
X> w York, II. Holt and company, 1898. Ixxvii, 793 p.
20\ cm .
9-21570 JK154 1898
306 The Federalist, a commentary on the Constitution of
the United States; being a collection of essays written in
support of the Constitution agreed upon September 17,
17^7. by the Federal convention, reprinted from the origi-
nal text of Alexander Hamilton, John Jay and James
Madison; ed. by Henry Cabot Lodge.
New York ((• London, G. P. Putnam's sons, 1902. aiv, 586 p.
21 cm .
Bibliography : p. xxxv-xlii.
4-15626 JK154 1902
The Library of Congress also has other editions.
307 Fish, Carl Russell. American diplomacy. 3d ed., rev.
Ni w York, II. Holt and company, 1919. xi, 551 p. maps
(.; doublt ) 21 rm . (American historical series. General
editor: (J. II. Ilaskins)
See Index under Treaties: p. 547-548.
19-8551 JX1407.F5 1919
308 Fleming, William Henry. Address before the Georgia bar
association at Warm Springs, Ga., on June 3, 1909. The
tn at \ making-power of the President and Senate: how
affected by the powers delegated to Congress, and by the
powers reserved to the states.
[n. p.] 1909. IS p. 2-3 cm .
" From the Augusta chronicle, Sunday, June 6, 1909."
12-20753 JK573.1909.F6
Also in Georgia bar association. Proceedings, 1909, p.
183-2(17.
TREATY-MAKING POWER IN THE UNITED STATES 59
309 Flood, E. C. Treaties and state laws.
Lawyer and banker, June 1917, v. 10: 181-196.
Central law journal, June 15, 1917, v. 84' 434-44%-
310 Fort, John Franklin. Treaty power under the Constitution of
the United States.
New Jersey law journal, Mar. 1912, v. 35: 68-76.
311 Foster, John W. The reciprocity treaties and the Senate.
Independent, Dec. 6, 1900, v. 52: 2897-2899. AP2.l53,v.52
312 The treaty-making; power under the Constitution.
Yale law journal, Dec. 1901, v. 11:69-79.
313 Gallatin, Albert. The writings of Albert Gallatin. Ed. by
Henry Adams.
Philadelphia [etc.] J. B. Lippincott & co., 1879. 3 v. fold,
tables. 25 cm .
Gallatin to John Forsyth, on treaties to which effect was
given by legislative act, v. 1, p. 684-687; Gallatin to D. D.
Field on the constitutional character of the resolution for
annexing Texas by a legislative act, v. 2, p. 605-610;
Gallatin to Edward Everett on the debate in the French
Chambers on the Convention of 1831, v. 2, p. 478-501.
See also index under " Treaties."
9-4592 E338.G16
314 Graydon, William. An abridgment of the laws of the United
States. Or, A complete digest of all such acts of Con-
gress as concern the United States at large. To which is
added, an appendix, containing, all existing treaties, the
Declaration of independence, the Articles of confedera-
tion, the rules and articles for the government of the
army, and the ordinance for the government of the Terri-
tory north-west of the Ohio.
Harrisburgh, (Penn.), Printed by John Wyeth, 1803. liii,
[3], 476, 163, [17] p. 21 V m .
17-16659
315 Green bag. [Editorial.] The treaty power and "state
rights ".
Green bag, Oct. 1913, v. 25: 451-451
316 Gregory, Charles Noble. Federal treaties and state laws.
Michigan law review, Nov. 1907, v. 6: 25-43.
317 Gulick, S. L., and others. Eesident aliens and treaty obliga-
tions; discussion.
Academy of political science. Proceedings, July, 1917, v. 7 :
576-594. H31.A4,v.7
60 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
318 H., S. R. The treaty-making power of the President.
Spectator, Mar. 29, 1919, v. 122: 391. AP4.S7,v.l22
319 Hall, J. P. State interference with the enforcement of treaties.
Acadt my of political science. Proceedings, July, 1917, v.
; : 548-657. H3i.A4,v.7
320 Hamilton, Alexander. Letters of Pacificus and Helvidins on
the proclamation of neutrality of 1793, by Alexander
Hamilton, (Pacificus.) and James Madison, (Helvidius,)
to which is prefixed the proclamation.
Washington, J. and G. S. Gideon, 1845. 102 p. 22 cm .
Includes discussions of the treaty-making power. See es-
pecially letters of Helvidius.
9-6122 E312.H21
321 The treaty-making power of the Executive.
The Federalist, no 75, Lodge's ed. JK154 1902
The Federalist, no. 74, Dawson's ed. JK154 1876
The Library of Congress has other editions.
322 The works of Alexander Hamilton, ed. by Henry Cabot
Lodge. New York c6 London, G. P. Putnam } s so ?is, 1885-
80. 9 v. front, {port.) 23\ cm .
Confederation of the United States defective in the treaty-
making power, v. 1, p. 293-294 ; Proposed clauses as to the
treaty-making power, v. 1, p. 332, 338, 342, 348, 351; " Pho-
cion" on breaches of treaty, v. 3, p. 481; Force of treaties
under political changes, v. 4, p. 29 ; Power of executive to
make treaties, v. 4, p. 139; Commercial treaty with France,
etc., " No Jacobin," v. 4, p. 198-229 ; Defence of Mr. Jay's
treaty, " Caniillus," v. 4, p. 369-524, v. 5, p. 3-332 ; Message
from Washington to Congress, in reply to a call for papers
relating to the treaty with Great Britain, v. 7, p. 118-137;
Power of the House, of Representatives in case of a treaty
discussed in letters to Washington, William Smith, Rufus
King and Oliver Wolcott, v. 8, p. 381-395. See also The
Federalist, v. 9 of Lodge's ed. of Hamilton's works.
9-4588 E302.H23
323 Same. [Federal ed.]
New York and London, G. P. Putnam's sons. 1904. 12 v.
13 port. (incl. fronts.) 24\ cm .
" Bibliography of the 'Federalist'"; v. 11, p. xxxi-xl.
See General index in vol. 10.
lo 1536 E302.H242
TREATY-MAKING POWER IN THE UNITED STATES 61
324 Hamilton, Alexander. Treaty making power of the executive.
National reporter, v. 5, Feb. 22, 1919, p. 1.
325 Hayden, R. States' rights doctrine and the treaty-making
power.
American historical review, Apr. 1917, v. 22: 566-585.
E171.A57,v.22
326 Hill, David Jayne. Present problems in foreign policy.
New York and London, D. Appleton and company, 1919.
xii p., 1 l, 360, [1] p. 19± cm .
Contains chapter on The treaty-making power under the Con-
stitution of the United States.
19-9943 JX1975.H6
327 Two lectures on the revised covenant of the League of
nations. Lecture. I. The corporate character of the League
of nations. Lecture IT. The treaty-making power under
the Constitution of the United States. Delivered before
George Washington university, Apr. 28, 29, 1919.
George Washington University. Bulletin, Mar. 1919, v.
18: 3-35.
328 Hill, Mabel, comp. Liberty documents, with contemporary ex-
position and critical comments drawn from various writ-
ers. Edited, with an introduction, by A. B. Hart.
New York, London [etc.] Longmans, Green, and co., 1901.
xxviii, 458 p. 8°.
Power in foreign relations in the instrument of government,
1G53, p. 86 ; in the articles of confederation, p. 207, 209 ; in
the Constitution of the United States, p. 255, 256; Alliances
to be avoided (Washington's Farewell address) p. 301, 303;
Policy of the United States in Foreign relations, p. 300-305,
822-326, 401 (Washington's Farewell Address, Monroe doc-
trine, Olney in Atlantic Monthly, 1900).
1-21806 JF107.H5
329 Hoist, Hermann Eduard von. The constitutional and political
history of the United States.
Chicago, Callahan and company, 1881-92. 8 v. 23 rm .
Rights of Congress concerning treaties, v. 3, p. 54, 55, 167
et seq. Power in the House of Representatives regarding
treaties, v. 5, p. 7, 8. See also on the subject of treaties,
v. 1. p. 131, 363, 437.
10-22032 E183.H76
62 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
330 Hunt, Gaillard. The treaty-making power.
Nation, June 20, 1912, v. 9%: 612. AP2.N2,v.94
Includes information concerning a memorandum l>y Madison in
regard to the right of the House to participate In the mak-
ing of treaties.
331 Hyde, Charles Cheney. Agreements of the United States other
than treaties.
Green hag. Apr. 1905, v. 17: 229-238.
"It is the purpose of the writer to show under what circum-
stances our government has deemed it not unconstitutional,
and therefore lawful, to enter into international compacts
which have not been submitted to the Senate for approval,
and to ascertain what has been the actual scope of the exer-
cise of the agreement-making power of the President as
distinct from the treaty-making power which is shared by
the Senate."
Appended is a list of international arbitration agreements
other than treaties negotiated in behalf of the United States.
332 Notes on the extradition treaties of the United States.
American journal of international Jaw. July, 1914, v. 8:
487-514. JXl.A6,v.8
833 State interference with the enforcement of treaties:
some means of prevention.
Acadi my of political science. Proceedings, July, 1917, v. 7 :
558-56%.. H31.A4,v.7
334 Imberg, Kurt Eduard. Die Schiedsgerichtsvertriige der Verei-
nigten Staaten von Nordamerika bis zur ersten Haager
Friedenskonferenz.
Zeit serif t fur Vblkerrecht, 1913, v. 7:272-285; 554.-569.
JX5.Z5,v.7
335 Jay, John. The correspondence and public papers of John Jay.
Ed. by Henry P. Johnston.
Neir York, London, G. P. Putnam' } s sons [1890-93] 4 v-
23V m .
< m the treaty-making power, (Federalist papers, no. G3), v. 3,
p. 285 294.
12-4G15 E302.J42
336 Treaty making power of the Senate. March 7, 1788.
The Federalist, no. 64 (Lodge's edition). JK154 1902
The Federalist, no. 03 (Dawson's edition). JK154 1876
The Library of Congress has other editions.
TREATY-MAKING POWER IN THE UNITED STATES 63
337 Jefferson, Thomas, pres. U. S. The writings of Thomas Jef-
ferson : being his autobiography, correspendence, reports,
messages, addresses, and other writings, official and pri-
vate. Pub. by the order of the Joint committee of Con-
gress on the library, from the original manuscripts, de-
posited in the Department of state. With explanatory
notes ... by the editor, H. A. Washington.
Washington, Taylor <& Maury, 1853-5 ^. 9 v. front, (port.)
4 fold, facsims. Z3\ cm .
6-7150 E302.J464
Treaties under the Confederation, v. 1, p. 55-60, 62-67,
349-352, 358-361, 370-374, 457-459, 460, 538-540, 557; v. 9,
p. 286; The expediency of making short treaties, v. 3, p.
165; Instructions to the ministers plenipotentiary ap-
pointed to negotiate treaties of commerce with the European
nations, May 7, 1784, v. 9, p. 226-230; Considerations re-
specting the treaty of peace with Great Britain, May 29,
1792, v. 3, p. 365-428; Treaties paramount to state laws,
v. 3, p. 399-406; Considerations respecting the treaties with
France, v. 4, p. 31-51; Opinion, April 28, 1793, on French
treaties, v. 7, p. 611-623; Cession of Louisiana, v. 4, p.
498-507; v. 8, p. 24; Power of the House of Representa-
tives over treaties, v. 4, p. 124, 125, 134-139; v. 9, p.
106-107, 114-115, 181, 190-191; The legislature the only
power to control a treaty, v. 4. p. 244; Policy in treaties,
v. 4, p. 26S, 414-415, 552-553; v. 5, p. 443-444; v. 6, p.
453-454; Limitations on the treaty-making power, v. 4, p.
506-507; Treaty with the Creeks, v. 6, p. 557-560; v. 7,
p. 504-506 ; Treaties of commerce, v. 6, p. 453^54 ; v. 7, p.
436-437 ; Delegation of the treaty-power by a state govern-
ment to the general government, v. 7, p. 467-469; Ne-
gotiations with Spain to secure the free navigation of
the Mississippi, v. 7, p. 568-592; Most favored nation
principle, v. 7, p. 583, 587; Considerations respecting
treaties, from Jefferson's "Manual," v. 9, p. 80-82;
Advice of the Senate necessary to confirm a treaty, but
not to reiect it, v. 7, p. 135; Jay treaty, v. 4, p. 120-122,
124-127, 131, 134-139, 148, 465-466; v. 9, p. 186-187, 190-
191; Whether the natural domain can be alienated by
treaty, v. 9, p. 135, 136-138; Effect of French Revolution
on treaties with France, v. 9, p. 142-143; Fidelity of United
States to treaties, v. 9, p. 236-239.
64 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
338 Jefferson, Thomas, pn s. U. S. The writings of Thomas Jeffer-
son; collected and ed. by Paul Leicester Ford.
New York [etc.] G. P. Putnam's sons, 1892-99. 10 v. 2S\ cm .
2-5666 E302.J466
Debate in Congress, June 8, 1770, and arguments of J. Adams,
Lee, Wythe, and others, as to independence, and treating
with European powers, v. 1, p. 21, 23; Treaties under the
Confederation, v. 1, p. 77-84, 86-94; v. 4, p. 54-59, 79-82,
Ml IK. 198-201; Instructions to the ministers plenipo-
tentiary appointed to negotiate treaties of commerce with
the European nations. May 7, 1784, v. 3, p. 4S9-493 ; Con-
siderations. .May 29, 1792, respecting the treaty of peace with
Great Britain, v. 6, p. 7-0!): Conversation with Mr. Ham-
mond, on the British treaty. June 3, 1792, v. 1, p. 193-198;
Treaties paramount to state laws, v. 6, p. 41-47 ; Delega-
tion of the treaty-power by a state government to the gen-
eral government, v. 5, p. 165-167; The expediency of mak-
ing short treaties, v. 5, p. 196 ; Treaty with the Creeks, v. 5,
p. 215-216; Negotiations with Spain to secure the free navi-
gation of the Mississippi, v. 5, p. 407-408, 460-481; Report
in convention with Spain, v. 5, p. 481-485; Project of a
convention with the Spanish provinces, v. 5, p. 485-487;
Most favored nation principle, v. 4, p. 19-20; v. 5, 473-476;
Considerations, Jan. 18, 1791, on the French treaties, v. 5,
p. 266-273; Opinion, April 28, 1793, on the French treaties,
v. 6, p. 219-231; Considerations, Aug. 16, 1793, respecting
the treaties with France, v. 6, p. 371-393 ; Power of the
House of Representatives over treaties, v. 1, p. 183-1S4,
190-192, 26S-2G!), 277-_ , 7S ; v. 7, p. 40, 41, 67-72 ; The legis-
lature the only power to control a treaty, v. 7, p. 260; Pol-
icy in treaties, v. 7, p. 328; v. 8, p. 97-99; v. 9, p. 512-513;
Cession of Louisiana, v. 8, p. 241-249, 261-263, 268-269;
Treaties of commerce, v. 9, p. 512-513; v. 10, p. 383-384;
Advice of the Senate necessary to confirm a treaty, but not
to reject it, v. 10, p. 142; Jay treaty, v. 1, p. 273-274,
277-278; v. 7, p. 27-33, 37-38, 40-42, 44, 58-59, 62, 67-72;
v. 8, p. 212 ; View of John Marshall, v. 7, p. 37 ; Whether the
national domain can be alienated by treaty, v. 1, p. 219-220;
Effect of French revolution on treaties with France, v. 1,
p. 226-227; Fidelity of the United States to treaties, v. 4,
p. 122-125.
330 — Same. New York and London, G. P. Putnam's sons,
1904-06. 12 v. fronts (ports.) fold, map, plans, facsims.
(//.//•/ fold.) 2JiV m .
6-15404 E302.J472
TREATY-MAKING POWER IN THE UNITED STATES 65
340 Jefferson, Thomas, pres. U. S. The writings of Thomas Jeffer-
son. Monticello ed., containing his Autobiography, Notes
on Virginia, parliamentary manual, official papers, mes-
sages and addresses, and other writings, official and pri-
vate, now collected and published in their entirety for -the
first time, including all of the original manuscripts, de-
posited in the Department of state and published in 1853
by order of the joint committee of Congress; with numer-
ous illustrations and a comprehensive analytical index.
Andrew A. Lipscomb. ..editor-in-chief. Albert Ellery
Bergh, managing editor.
Washington, D. C ., Issued under the auspices of the
Thomas Jefferson memorial association of the United
States 1904-05. 20 v. fronts., plates, ports., fold, map,
facsims. {part fold.) 22\ cm .
"A contribution to bibliography of Thomas Jefferson, com-
piled by Richard Holland Johnston": v. 20 (iv, 73 p.)
4-18791 E302.J471
340a Same. Washington, D. C, Issued under the auspices
of the Thomas Jefferson memorial association of the
United States, 1905. 20 v. in 10. fronts., plates, ports.,
facsims. (part fold.) 22\ cm .
8-30595 E302.J474
341 The Jeffersonian cyclopedia; a comprehensive collec-
tion of the views of Thomas Jefferson classified and ar-
ranged in alphabetical order under nine thousand titles
relating to government, politics (law, education, political
economy, finance, science, art, literature, religious free-
dom, morals, etc. ; ed. by John P. Foley.
New York and London, Funk & W agnails company, 1900.
4 p. I, [xiii\-xxii, [2], 1009 p. front., plates, ports. 25\ cm .
Quotations from Jefferson's writings on treaties, with refer-
ences to the sources, and including discussions of the treaty-
making power, p. 874-886 ; Jay treaty, p. 436-438.
0-^337 JK113.J4
342 A manual of parliamentary practice: for the use of
the Senate of the United States. 2d ed. With the last
additions of the author.
Washington, William Cooper; and by Joseph Milligan,
Georgetown, 1812. 188 p. 13 cm .
Treaties, sec. 52, p. 168-174.
1-1294 JK1091 1812
137190°— 20 5
66 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
343 Jeze, Gaston. Du role des chambres dans l'approbation on
l'execution des traites internationaux d'apres la Consti-
tution des £tats-Unis de l'Amerique du Xord.
Ri vin du droit public et de hi sciena politique en France
it a Vetranger. July-Sept., 1904, v. 21: 455-614-
JAll.R5,v.21
344 Jones, Francois Stewart. Treaties and treaty-making.
Political science quarU ////, Sept. 1897, v. 12: 420-449-
Describes the procedure in formation of treaties, and gives
some account of the treaty-making prerogative in various
countries particularly in the United States. Gives examples
of the exercise of powers vested in the President and Senate
respecting ratification of treaties.
Hl.P8,v.l2
345 Kasson, John Adam. The evolution of the Constitution of
the United States of America and History of the Monroe
doctrine.
Boston and Xeir York. Houf/hton. Mifflin and company,
1904. xvlll, 273, [1] p. front., port. 21 cm .
Treaties and their force, p. 140-161.
4-33896 JK116.K3
346 Reciprocity ; the benefits that will accrue to this country by
the confirmation of the treaties now pending in the United
States Senate.
[Chicago, Rogers and Wells printers, 1901] 4b-> [4] ?-•> 1 ^
19 cm .
" Delivered before the Illinois manufacturers' association at
Chicago, October 24, 1901."
Discusses among other topics, "Are reciprocity treaties war-
ranted by our Constitution," " Their relation to the most-
favored-nation clause," "The Congressional reciprocity of
1890 and 1897," etc.
Mr. Kasson's conclusion is " that reciprocal commercial con-
ventions, duly ratified, nfay make concessions of duties, as
well as of other commercial favors and privileges; and that
they will remain in force until repealed by Congress."
9-26020 HF1731.K3
347 Kellogg, Frank B. Treaty making power.
(/» American bar association. Report, 1913. Baltimore, 1913.
L':U cm . P- 331-359.)
Also printed in Chicago legal news, Oct. 11, 1913, v. 46: 75-76,
78-80; Ohio law bulletin, Oct. 20, 1913, v. 58: 401-414.
Summary printed in American Legal news Sept. 1913, v. 24:
23-24; Washington law reporter, Sept. 12, 1913, v. 41:
590-591.
TREATY-MAKING POWER IN THE UNITED STATES 67
348 Kuhn, Arthur K. The treaty-making power and the reserved
sovereignty of the states.
Columbia law review, Mar. 1907, v. 7: 172-185.
" From the very nature of our government, the treaty-making
power nfust reside centrally or nowhere. If there be a
limitation upon the power of the President and Senate to
enter into a particular treaty, the power of the entire nation
has been so much cut down." p. 184.
349 Lawrence, William. The treaty power under the Constitu-
tion of the United States.
[Washington, D. C, 1871-1875.] 4 pts. in 1 vol 8°.
A made up volume with inserted manuscript title-page and
preface, the latter reading:
" The following papers were written in form of arguments
for the purposes therein indicated. In them will be found,
to some extent, a discussion of the Treaty Power under
the Constitution of the United States, with a reference to
many authorities and official documents which may be
found useful in the investigation of the subject.
" The reader is also referred to the case of Wood vs. The
M. K. and T. Railway Co., 11 Kansas Reports 323, and
Holden vs. Joy, 17 Wallace Reports 11.
" W. L."
Included are the following: Peter J. Holden, appellant, vs.
James Joy, Supreme Court of the United States, December
term, 1871 ; Argument of William Lawrence, on behalf of
citizens of Kansas, against the claims of the Missouri,
Kansas and Texas railroad company and the Leavenworth,
Lawrence and Galveston railroad company, to any part
of the Osage lands in Kansas, and in favor of the claims of
settlers thereon; The Leavenworth, Lawrence and Gal-
veston railroad company, appellant, vs. the United States,
Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1874;
The Leavenworth, Lawrence, and Galveston Railroad com-
pany, and the Farmers' Loan and Trust Company, appel-
lants, vs. the United States, Supreme Court of the United
States, October term, 1875.
850 [Lawrence, William Beach. Treaties and the legislative
authority of Congress.]
(In Wheaton, Henry. Elements of international law. 2d
annotated ed. by William Beach Lawrence, p. 458-^60
Boston, 1863. 8°.)
A note touching on the debates in Congress in 1796 and 1816
on the treaties with Great Britain and on the debates dur-
ing the session 1853-1854 on the appropriations required
for the convention then recently entered into by the Presi-
dent and Senate with Mexico. Public treaties. The
authority required to declare a treaty no longer operative
and the convention of 1831 with France are also discussed.
JX2495.E3 1863
68 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
351 Leake, Walter. The limitations upon the treaty-making power.
Virginia law registi r. July, 1915, n. s. v. 15: 72-75.
352 Lewis, William Draper. Treaty powers: protection of treaty
rights by federal government.
American academy of political and social scienet . Annals,
Sept. 1909, v. s'',: 313 328. Hl.A4,v.34
353 [Lincoln, Enoch] The decision of the King of the Netherlands
considered in reference to the rights of the United States
and of the state of Maine.
Portland: Printed by Thomas Todd, 1831. 35 p. 8°.
"Treaty-making power." p. 13-17. "the United States have
n institutional power to deprive a state of a portion of
her territory and without her consent cede that territory to
ii foreign power."
354 Littlefield, Charles E. Constitutional aspect of the arbitration
treaties.
(In Lake Mohonk conference on international arbitration,
11th report, 190o. p. 71-79, Lake Mohonk, 1905. 22i cm .)
JX1932.L3 1905
355 Lodge, Henry Cabot. The Senate.
Saibjier's magazine, Nov. 1903, v. 3!+: 541-550. AP2.S4,v.34
Includes a summary of the development of the treaty-making
power.
356 The Senate of the United States.
(In Ms A frontier town and other essays, p. 56-85. New
York, 1906. 21 cm .)
Treaty-making power, p. 79-80 E173.L79
357 The treaty-making powers of the Senate.
Scribner's magazine, Jan. 1902, v. 31: 33-1$. AP2.S4,v.3i
Reprinted in the author's "A fighting frigate, and other essays
and addresses," N. Y., 1902, and also as Senate doc. no.
104, 57th Cong., 1st sess. (Serial no. 42P>0). Senator Lodge
sets forth his conclusions as follows:
"The results of the preceding inquiry can be easily sum-
marized. Practice and precedent, the action of the Senate
and of the Presidents, and the decision of the Supreme
Court show that the power of the Senate in the
making of treaties lias always been held, as the Con-
stitution Intended, to be equal to and coordinate with
that of the President, except in the initiation of a nego-
tiation, which can of necessity only be undertaken by the
President alone. The Senate has the right to recommend
entering upon a negotiation; or the reverse; but the right
it lias wisely refrained exercising, except upon rare occa-
sions. The Senate lias the right to amend, and this right
TREATY-MAKING POWER IN THE UNITED STATES 69
it has always exercised largely and freely. It is also clear
that any action taken by the Senate is a part of the
negotiation, just as much so as the action of the President
through the Secretary of State. In other words, the action
of the Senate upon a treaty is not merely to give sanction
to the treaty, but is an integral part of the treaty-making,
and may be taken at any stage of a negotiation."
358 I/Oughbridge, William. [The rights, the powers, and the con-
stitutional prerogatives of the House of Representatives.
Speeches on the House bill making an appropriation of
money to carry into effect the treaty with Russia of
March 30, 1867.]
Congressional Globe, Ifith Cong., 2d sess., part 4, June 30,
1868, p. 3621-3625; part 5, July 23, 1868, p. 4393-4394.
359 Low, A. M. The oligarchy of the Senate.
North American review, Feb. 1902, v. 174; 231-244.
Discusses the Senate's exercise of power over treaty making.
AP2.N7,v.l74
860 The usurped powers of the Senate.
American political science review, Nov. 1906, v. 1:1-16.
JAl.A6,v.l
361 Lyman, Theodore. The diplomacy of the United States.
Being an account of the foreign relations of the country,
from the first treaty with France, in 1778, to the present
time. 2d ed. — with additions.
Boston, Wells and Lilly, 1828. 2 v. 23 cm .
Commercial convention of 1818 with Great Britain, v. 2,
p. 76-118; Convention of navigation and commerce of 1822
with France, p. 170-190; Colonial trade with Great Britain,
p. 310-334.
4-20773 JX1412.L9 1828
362 McCall, S. W. The power of the Senate.
Atlantic monthly, Oct. 1903, v. 92:433-442.
" The expansion of the power of the Senate in an undemocratic
as well as an unconstitutional direction is also seen in the
growing tendency to pass laws, and especially taxation laws,
by treaty," page 441.
AP2.A8,v.92
363 Macfarland, H. B. F. The arbitration treaties laid before the
Senate last winter.
(In Lake Mohonk conference on international arbitration.
Report 1905, p. 58-64. Mohonk Lake, 1905.)
JX1932.L3 1905
70 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
364 Maclay, William. Journal of William Maclay, United States
senator Erom Pennsylvania, 1789-1791. Ed. by Edgar S.
Maclay.
New York, D. Appleton and company, 1890. xiv p., / L, Jf.38
p. front, (port.) 21\ cm .
The President in the Senate chamber and early procedure In
the consideration of treaties illustrated in the consideration
of certain Indian treaties: p. 128-133.
9 26607 JK1036 1789d
365 Sketches of debate in the first Senate of the United
State-, in 1789-90-91. Ed. by George W. Harris.
Harrisbw ■■(/. L. S. Hart, printer, \ C 18S0] ccvii, 257 p. front,
{port.) 2S\ cm .
The President in the Senate chamber and early procedure in
the consideration of treaties illustrated in the consideration
of certain Indian treaties: p. 122-126.
A13-1073 JK1036 1791
366 Madison, James, pres. U. S. Letters and other writings of
James Madison. Published by order of Congress.
Philadelphia, J. B. Lippincott d- co., 1865. 4 v. front,
(port.) 2Jr n .
Discussions on treaties and the treaty-making power in all
four volumes. See especially, Letter to Edmund Fendleton,
July 2, 1791, v. 1. p. 523 526; Helvidius in answer to
Pacificus, v. 1, p. 607-654; Letters to Jefferson on the Jay
treaty, Dec. 27, 1795, Jan. 31, March 13, April 4, April 11,
April is and May 1, 1796. v. 2, p. 69-70, 75-76, 88-91, 04-95,
99-KM>: Letters to James Monroe, on the Jay treaty, Jan.
2G. May 14. 1790, v. 2, p. 73, 101-102; Amendment proposed
by Virginia, requiring the consent of the House of Represen-
tatives to treaties, v. 2, p. 82-83; "Treaties," v. 2, p. 260-288,
(in "A memoir, containing an examination of the Rritish
doctrine, which subjects to capture a neutral trade not open
in time of peace"): '•Remarks on an extract from Hamil-
ton's report, published in the Richmond Enquirer," v. 3, p.
515; Letter to George Tucker, July 0. 1833, v. A, p. 303;
Letter to Edward Coles, Oct. 15, 1834, v. 4, p. 370.
9-321 50 E313.H22
367 Letters of Helvidius; written in reply to Pacificus, on
the President's proclamation of neutrality. Published
originally in the year 1793.
Philadelphia: Printed by Samuel 11. Smith, no. 118, Chest-
nut stret t, 1796. 48 p. .:: m .
U 32150 E313.H22
TREATY-MAKING POWER IN THE UNITED STATES 71
368 Madison, James, pre*. U. S. The papers of James Madison,
purchased by order of Congress; being his correspondence
and reports of debates during the Congress of the con-
federation, and his reports of debates in the Federal con-
vention; now published from the original manuscripts,
deposited in the Department of state, by direction of the
Joint library committee of Congress, under the superin-
tendence of Henry D. Gilpin.
Washington, Langtree & O'Sullivan, 1840. 3 v. facsims.
%lf m .
See especially Madison's letter to Edmund Randolph, May,
1783 dealing largely with commercial treaties, v. 1, p.
533-538, the discussion of Jay's report on the treaty of
peace, 1787, v. 2, p. 595-597, the operation of treaties on the
States under the Confederation, v. 2, p. 595. 616, 635, 639,
658 712 729 and some portions of the debates on the Fed-
eral convention of 1787 as have to do with the treaty-
making power, references to which are to be found in the
index, v. 3. p. ccxxxiii-ccxxxiv.
6-17045 JK111 ' M2
369 An examination of the British doctrine, which subjects
to capture a neutral trade, not open in time of peace.
[Philadelphia? 1806?] 1 p. I, 6~m V- **"-
Treaties: p. 43-78.
-m ,-opm. JX5316.M26
10-1 < 356
3 70 The writings of James Madison, comprising his public
papers and his private correspondence, including numer-
ous letters and documents now for the first time printed.
Ed. by Gaillard Hunt.
New York [etc.] G. P. Putnam's sons, 1900-10. 9 v. front
(port.) illus., 6 facsim. {partly fold.) %3\ cm .
1-20807 E302.M22
371 Marshall, John. John Marshall, complete constitutional de-
cisions, ed. with annotations historical, critical and legal,
bv John M. Dillon.
Chicago, Callaghan & co., 1903, xi, [1], 799 p. front.
Neto York [etc.] G. P. Putnam's sons, 1900-10. 9 v., front,
(port.) 2 fold, facsim. U cm -
Constitutional power of the United States to acquire territory
by conquest or treaty, American Insurance company v. Can-
ter, p. 586-603. Various treaties with the Indians, p. 688, 703,
704 706, 710, 711, 713; Treaty of Holston, p. 688, 711, 713;
Treaty of Hopewell, p. 688, 706. 710; Cherokee Nation v.
Georgia, p. 655-679; Worcester v. Georgia, p. 680-723.
3_3 2779 JK181.M32 1903
72 LIBRAEY OF CONGRESS
372 May the United States protect immigrants?
Outlook, May 29, 1909, v. 92:251. AP2.08,v.92
373 Meier, Ernst. Uber den Abschluss von Staatsvertriigen.
Leipzig, Dunch r & Ilumblot, 1871).. xiii, 368 p. 23 rm .
Die Vereinigten Staaten von Nordamerika : p. 163-211.
"Thai a treaty cannot invade the constitutional prerogatives
of the legislature is thus illustrated by a German author,
who has given to the subject a degree of elaborate and
extended exposition which it lias received from no writer
in our own tongue. "Congress has under the Constitution
the righl to lay taxes and Imposts, as well as to regulate for-
eign trade, but the President and Senate, if the " treaty-
making power "' be regarded as absolute, would be able to
evade this limitation by adopting treaties which would com-
pel Congress to destroy its whole tariff system. According
to the Constitution, Congress has the right to determine
questions of naturalization, of patents, and of copyright.
Yet, according to the view here contested, the President
and the Senate, by a treaty, could on these important ques-
tions utterly destroy the legislative capacity of the House
of Representatives . . . Congress would cease to be the law-
making power as is prescribed by the Constitution; the law-
making power would be the President and the Senate. Such
a < dition would become the more dangerous from the fact
that treaties so adopted, being on this particular hypothesis
superior to legislation, would continue in force until super-
seded by other treaties. Not only, therefore, would a Con-
gress consisting of two houses be made to give way to an
oligarchy of President and Senate, but the decrees of this
Oligarchy, when once made, could only be changed by con-
currence of President and of Senatorial majority of two-
thirds." Cited in Wharton, Francis. "A digest of the in-
ternational law of the United States," Washington. 1SS6.
v. 2, p. 26-27.
2— 18652 JX4171.T5M4
374 Michon, Louis. Les traites internationaux devant les chambres.
Paris, A. Ohevalii r-Marescq & c ie , 1901. S p. 1., 520 p. 23 cm .
The treaty-making power in the United States: p. 14-15,
I Id 465.
S-8752 JN2809.M6
375 Mikell, William E. The extent of the treaty-making power of
the President ami senate of the United State-.
University of Pennsylvania hur ,-, <■;,,/- and American law
n gistt r. Apr. Mag. 1909, v. 57:^35-458; 528-662.
37G Miller, Shackelford. Treaty-making power.
American law review, July-Aug., 1907, c. l t l : 527-5 1 { 9.
TREATY-MAKING POWER IN THE UNITED STATES 73
377 Miyakawa, Masuji. Powers of the American people, Congress,
President, and courts (according to the evolution of con-
stitutional construction) . 2d cd., completely rev. through-
out with extensive additions.
New York, The Baker & Taylor co., 1908. xlv p., 1 I., $1 p.
23\ cm .
Treaty : p. 239-266.
8-24433 JK246.M64
378 Moody, William H. Constitutional powers of the Senate: a
reply.
North American review, Mar. 1902, v. 11 %: 386-39 %.
A rejoinder to the article by A. Maurice Low, in the North
American review for Feb. 1902.
Treaty-making power, p. 388-389. AP2.N7.V.174
879 Moore, John Bassett. History and digest of the international
arbitrations to which the United States has been a party,
together with appendices containing the treaties relating
to such arbitrations, and historical and legal notes.
Washington, Gov't print, off., 1898. G v. fold, maps, facsim.
23 cm .
" List of authorities " : v. 1, p. lxxxiii-xcviii.
4-3795 JX1987.A2
380 Report on extradition, with returns of all cases from
August 9, 1842, to January 1, 1890, and an index.
Washington, Gov't print, off., 1890. 239 p. 29 cm .
JX4302.1890.M72
381 Treaties and executive agreements.
Political science quarterly, Sept. 1905, v. 20: 385-1,20.
1. Question as to general arbitration treaties. 2. The terms
" treaty," " convention," " protocol." 3. Examples of purely
executive agreements. J f . Arguments under acts of Con-
gress: (1) Postal "treaties;" (2) Reciprocity agree-
ments; (3) Discriminating duties, copyrights, and trade
marks; (4) Indian treaties. 5. The modus vivendi. 6. The
settlement of preliminary claims: (1) By treaty; (2) By
executive agreement ; (3) Arbitrations under executive agree-
ments. 7. Executive enforcement of statutes and treaties.
HI.P8,v.20
JK573.1905.M6
382 Morey, William Carey. The treaty-making power and the
legislative authority of the states.
Rochester, N. Y., The Genesee press [etc. 1909] 10 p.
23 cm . (Post express specials, series B — no. 1)
9-18869 JK573._1909.M6
74 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
383 Morgan, John T. Relations with Greal liritain and Canada.
(In Congressional record, 50th Cong., 1st sess., v. 19, pt 9,
Sept. L8, 1888, p. 8672 8674; Sept. 25, 1888, p. 8913-8920.)
Senate held to have become aggressive "in Its endeavor to
control by resolutions and through the action of committees
the whole diplomatic relations between the United States
and foreign powers."
Jll.R5,v.l9,pt.9
384 Morrill, Justin S. Reciprocity treaties.
(I>i Appleton's annual cyclopaedia and register of important
events of the year 1885, p. 238-241. New York, 1886.
25i cm .)
Substance of his speech delivered in the United States Senate,
Jan. 7, 1885.
AE5.A7 1885
385 Reciprocity treaty with Canada. Speech in the Senate
of the United States, February 3, 1875.
Washington: Government printing office, 1875. 22 p. 8°.
" Constitutional objections," p. 8-12.
386 Reciprocity treaties, so-called. Speech in the Senate,
Jan. 7. 1885.
(In Congressional record, 48th Cong. 2d sess., v. 16, pt. 1,
p. 506 513.)
Denies the constitutionality of treaties of reciprocity, and in
support of position taken, adduces arguments from the ad-
verse reports of Choate and Archer on the Zollvereiu treaty
of 1844.
Jll.R5,v.l6,pt.l
387 Morris, Heman W. The powers of Congress over treaties.
{In New York state bar association. Proceedings. 1903.
Albany, 1903. 24 cm . v. 26; p. 95-115.)
Same. American law review, May-June, 1903, v.
37:368-379.
The treaty-making power is considered both on the historical
and the legal side and the opinion is stated, in conclusion,
"that a treaty will never be made by this government or
in any rate carried into effect, SO as to subvert an act of
Congress, until it shall have received, in some manner, Un-
sanction of that body: thai the courts will never be called
on to determine the force and effect of such a treaty
upon existing laws, and thai the danger of a clash between
the treaty-making power and the legislative branch of the
general government, while always present in theory, is to
all intents and purposes nonexistent"
TKEATY-MAKING POWER IN THE UNITED STATES 75
388 Nelson, Henry Loomis. Chamberlain's tripartite under-
standing.
Harper's weekly, Dec. 30, 1899, v. 43: 1315-1316.
' In discussing " whatever understanding there may be be-
between this country and Germany and Great Britain,"
the author holds that the tendency of American diplomacy
will be " to avoid treaties more and more, and to work
through what Mr. Chamberlain has called an understand-
ing." Tbe Senate is made responsible for difficulties of
treaty-making.
AP2.H32,v.43
389 A mistake of the fathers.
Harper's weekly, June, 22, 1901, v. 45: 623.
Holds that " the Senate's power of ratification must be set
down as one of the mistakes of the fathers."
AP2.H32,v.45
390 The weakness of the executive power in democracy.
Harper's new monthly magazine, Jan. 1899, v. 98: 210-
2JS. AP2.H3.V.98
"American diplomacy," Mr. Nelson states, " has often seen its
triumphs mined by the intervention of Congress."
391 The obligation of treaty stipulations. The Chinese empire
and the United States.
Washington law reporter, Feb. 17, 1879, v. 7: 52-53.
392 [Ogden, Rollo.] The graveyard of good treaties.
Nation, Mar. 15, 1900, v. 70: 199-200. AP2.N2,v.70
On the " obscurantist and obstructionist attitude of the
Senate."
393 [ ] The paralysis of the treaty-making power.
Nation, Dec. 20, 1900, v. 71: 481-482. AP2.N2,v.71
Senate regarded as " the great assassin of treaties."
394 Paine, Robert Treat. What ought to be done with the arbitra-
tion treaties?
(In Lake Mohonk conference on international arbitration, 11th
report, 1905, p. 79-81. Lake Mohonk, 1905. 22i cm .)
JX1932.L3 1905
395 Patterson, Christopher Stuart. The constitutionality of the
reciprocity clause of the McKinley tariff act.
American law register and review, Feb., 1892, v. 31 [2d
ser., vol. 5], p. 65-75.
Cites numerous cases.
76 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
396 Pierce, Franklin. Federal usurpation.
N< w York, D. Appleton and company, 190S. xx, $7 p.
gjcm
"This book is a plea for the sacredness of the Constitution
of the I'nited States."
" Treaty power and state rights," p. 241-265.
8-4.; ts JK311.P5
397 Powers of the states — treaty-making power.
Yah Jaw journal, Jan., 1918, v. 27: 406-407.
.Mi Henry County v. Brady (N. D.)
398 Putney, Albert H. The police power of the states as restricted
by the federal constitution.
Case and comment, Oct., 1913, v. 20: 310-315.
399 Randolph, Carman Fitz. The law and policy of annexation,
with special reference to the Philippines, together with
observations on the status of Cuba.
New York, Longmans, Green, & co., 1901. xi, 226 p. 2Y m .
Treaties of annexation, p. 4-7, 59, 148; The making of a
treaty, p. 13,147; Construction of treaties, p. 16-20 ; Treaties
subordinate to the Constitution, p. 17; Ratification of the
Treaty of Paris, p. 22.
1 ::. with a chapter on the treaty-making
power of the House of representatives.
[N( w Hav< n. Conn., Tin Tutth . Morehouse <£• Taylor press,
1904] ■'■'" /'• f'dd. map, fold, tab., diagrs. {1 fold.)
23V m .
Bibliographies: p. 7S-82, 157-1G0, 17G.
5 H966 HF1732.A1R5
402 - The treaty-making power of the House of Representa-
tive-.
Yah /< '■/> "•. .\n. 203.
TREATY-MAKING POWER IN THE UNITED STATES 77
403 Rogers, Henry Wade. The treaty-making power.
American bar association. Report of the sixteenth annual
meeting . . . 1893, p. 243-269. Philadelphia, 1893. 8°.
Am. Ins. Co. v. Canter, 1 Peters, 511, 542. Limitations of
Congress in enacting laws, Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch
' 137. Case of a treaty contrary to the laws of the British
Constitution. The Parlement Beige, L. R., 4 P. D., 154.
Power to declare treaties void, Ware v. Hylton, 3 Dallas,
199, 237.
Cases cited: A treaty which should invade in any way the
reserved rights of the States would be unconstitutional, Pre-
vost v. Guneau, 19 How. 7. The government of the Union
"possesses the power of acquiring territory either by con-
quest or treaty," Marshall, C. J.
404 Ruttimann, Johann Jakob. Das nordamerikanische Bundes-
staatsrecht verglichen mit den politischen Einrichtungen
der Schweiz.
Zurich, Orell Fiissli und corny., 1867-1872. 2 v. in 1. 22\™.
" Die Vertretung der Union gegeniiber dem Auslande," Th. 1,
p. 291-303. " Die Ordnung der aussern Angelegenheiten,"
Th. 2. Abth. 1, p. 1-29. "Die Ordnung des Handels mit
dem Auslande," Th. 2, Abth. 1, p. 13-24.
CA 10-3714 JK295.R8
405 Schuyler, Eugene. American diplomacy and the furtherance
of commerce.
New York: Charles Scribner's sons, 1886. xiv, 469 p. 8°.
Treaty power in the Senate and House, p. 22.
Commercial treaties, p. 421-457.
JX1407.S3
406 The Senate and the treaties.
Nation, May 30, 1872, v. lp 348-349. AP2.N2,v.l4
On "complications between the Senate and the Executive"
which "affect foreign nations and bring discredit on us in
our international relations." The " Reverdy-Johnson treaty,"
the " Danish-Island treaty," and the " Washington treaty "
used as "three striking illustrations of the inconveniences
of our mode of dealing with foreign affairs."
407 The Senate as treaty-maker.
Nation, Jan. 30, 1902, v. 74: 84-85. AP2.N2,v.74
A criticism of Senator Lodge's article in Scribner's magazine
for Jan., 1902, on " The treaty-making powers of the Senate."
78 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
408 Spear, Samuel T. The conflict of treaties and laws.
Albany law journal, Sept. 18, 1880, v. 22: 22i
Authorities quoted: Writings of Madison, vol. 1, page ."24.
Works of Hamilton, vol. 7, page 512. Rawle on the Con-
stitution, page 56. Attorney-Gen. Crittenden, 5 Op. Att.-
Gen., 345. Attorney* Jen. Cushlng, G (>i>. Att.-Gen., 29:5. At-
torney-Gen. Ackerman, 13 Op. Att.-Gen., 357. Chancellor
Kent "overstates the matter" in Com. (3d ed.), vol. 1,
page 166.
Cases cited: The United States v. The Schooner Peggy, 1
Cranch, 103; Foster v. Neilson, 2 Pet., 253; The Clinton
Bridge, 1 Wool., 150; Ropes et al. v. Clinch, 8 Blatchf., 304;
Taylor et al. v. Morton, 2 Curtis 454; The Cherokee Tobacco
case, 11 Wall, 616.
409 Congress and the treaty power.
Albany law journal, Aug. U, 1880, v. 22: 126-129.
Chancellor Kent on a treaty requiring the payment of money:
Kent's Com. (3d ed.) vol. 1, pp. 165, 166; On the obligatory
nature of a treaty with respect to the House of Representa-
tives : id. page 286. (" On the President.")
Chancellor Kent holds (1) That every treaty made by the
President of the United States with the consent and ap-
proval of the Senate, is, ipso facto, a supreme law of the
land; (2) That if any legislative action on the part of
Congress is necessary, it is the duty of Congress to supply
this legislation. In regard to the matter involved in both
of these propositions, see McLean, Mr. J., in Turner v.
American Baptist Missionary Union, 5 McLean, 344. View
opposite to that held by Chancellor Kent.
Compare also the following: Marshall, C. .T., in Foster v.
Neilson, l> Pet, 253, referred to and reaffirmed in the United
States v. Arredondo 6 Pet., 691, and again reaffirmed in the
X'nited States v. Perecheman, 7 Pet., 51. Oppose the view of
Chancellor Kent. See also, The Matter of Metzger, 1 Barb.,
248, in which Judge Edmonds repeats the opinion stated
by Chief Justice Marshall. Judge Edmonds's decision ren-
dered in 1847, was followed by an act of Congress in 1848,
"Giving effect to certain treaty stipulations between this
and foreign governments for the apprehension and de-
livering up of certain offenders," 9 U. S. Stat, at Large, 302.
Qualification to the treaty making power given in Law-
rence's Wheaton, page 457.
1816. Debate in the Senate on the treaty making power.
Senator Macon of North Carolina, in Benton's Abridge-
ment, vol. 5, page 456. Senator Campbell, of Tennessee,
id. page 458. Ulpian: "lb' who contracts with another
knows or ought to know his condition."
Treaty making power can not subvert the Constitution: —
Story's Const. §1508.
TREATY-MAKING POWER IN THE UNITED STATES 79
Power to annul and abolish a treaty belongs to Congress.
Congress, in 1798, abolished all existing treaties between
the United States and France. 1 U. S. Stat, at Large, 578.
Legal omnipotence of treaties, as Blackstone held the doc-
trine, is not compatible with the distribution of powers
made by the Constitution of the United States, and does
not accord with the modern practice .of Great Britain in
making treaties.
See Todd's Treatise upon Parliamentary Government in Eng-
land, vol. 1, page 610, on the power of Parliament in the
matter of treaty making. Refers to any proposition that
may be made to change existing tariffs, etc.
410 Spear, Samuel T. The legal operation of treaties.
Albany law journal, Sept. 11, 1880, v. 22: 206-210.
Treaties of the United States are part of "the supreme law
of the land."
(1) Treaties are equal in rank to the laws of Congress. Courts
must take notice of them : Story, J., in Martin v. Hunter's
Lessee, 1 Wheat., 304. Rank of treaties: Marshall, C. J.,
The United States v. The Schooner Peggy, 1 Cranch, 103;
Marshall, C. J., Foster v. Neilson, 2 Pet., 253.
(2) This judicial notice extends to treaties which preceded
the adoption of the Constitution as well as those made since
its adoption, and also to treaties with the Indian tribes,
as well as to those with foreign nations: Chase, Mr. J., in
Ware v. Hylton, 3 Dall., 199; Marshall, C. .T., Worcester v.
The State of Georgia, 6 Pet., 515 ; McLean, Mr. J., Turner v.
The American Baptist Missionary Union, 5 McLean, 344.
(3) "Cases in law and equity" arising under treaties of the
United States are such, and such only, as involve rights that
directly grow out of or are directly protected by these
treaties : Marshall, C. J., in Owings v. Norwood's Lessee,
5 Cranch, 344; Henderson v. Tennessee, 10 How. 311; Gill
v. Oliver's Executors, II id. 529; and Verden v. Coleman,
1 Black, 472.
(4) The construction of treaties, considered as laws affecting
rights as between individuals is exclusively a judicial func-
tion : Grier, Mr. J., in Wilson v. Wall, 6 Wall., 83; Story,
Mr. J., The Amiable Isabella, 6 Wheat., 1; Daniel, Mr. J.,
United States v. D'Auterive, 10 How. 609; Story, Mr. J.,
The United States v. The Armistad, 15 Pet., 518.
(5) Rights of property acquired and vested under treaties are
not divested by their termination even by war: Washing-
ton, Mr. J., in The Society v. New Haven, 8 Wheat., 464;
Meade v. The United States, 2 Ct. of CI. 224.
(6) Treaties, regarded simply as contracts between the gov-
ernments making them, take effect at and from the date of
their signature, unless they otherwise stipulate ; but consid-
ered as laws affecting the rights of citizens of the United
States, they do not take effect until ratified and proclaimed :
Davis v. The Police Jury of Concordia, 9 How. 280; The
80 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
United States v. Arredondo, 6 Pet, 691; Haver v. Taker,
Wall., 32.
(7 1 The competency of the contracting parties to make a
treaty is not a question into which courts can inquire as a
condition precedent to regarding it as a law: Taney, C. J.,
in Doe v. Braden, 10 How., 635; Fellows v. Blacksmith,
151 How., 366.
(8) Treaties that require no legislation on the part of Con-
gress to carry them into effect have the character of
supreme laws when ratified and proclaimed; but if they
require such legislation for their execution, then they are
not a rule for courts until the necessary legislation has
been supplied : Marshall, C. J., in Foster v. Neilson, 2 Pet.,
253; McLean, Mr. J., in Turner v. The American Baptist
Missionary Union, 5 McLean, 344.
(9) Treaties of the United States abrogate all provisions in
State Constitutions or laws in conflict therewith: Ware v.
Hylton, 3 Dall., 199. Sec 8 U. S. Stat, at Large, 80;
Owings v. Norwood's Lessee, 5 Cranch, 344; Fairfax's v.
Devisee v. Hunter's Lessee, 7 id. 603 ; Gordon's Lessee v.
Halliday, 1 Wash., 291 ; and Fisher v. Harden, 1 Paine, 55.
Duty of state judges to regard the treaties of the United
States as supreme laws and the same duty is devolved on
the National judiciary.
(1<») The constitutional validity of treaties, considered as
municipal laws, is a question which courts, with proper
cases before them, are authorized to consider and deter-
mine: Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch, 137 (The Consti-
tution itself is in all cases the paramount authority, and
no law in conflict with the Constitution can bind any
court, whether State or National.) Doe v. Braden, 16
How., 03."); The Cherokee Tobacco Case, 11 Wall., 616.
In this connection, see also Sec. 709 of the Revised Statutes
of the United states.
411 Spear, Samuel T. The treaty power.
Albany law journal, Aug. 7, 1880, vol. 22: 107-109.
Power to make treaties, Art. 2, sec. 2 of the Constitution,
interpreted: By Taney, C. J., Holmes v. Jennison, 14 Pet.,
540; by Story, J., Story's Const., §150S. Treaties must be
consistent with the several provisions of the Constitution:
Story's <'onst., §1508; Miller, J., The Loan Association v.
Toprk,,, L'(i Wall., 655; People v. Gerke, 5 Cal., 3S1 ; Pierce
v. State, L5 X. II.. :::'.<;. Some treaties are self-operative.
They art directly, proprio >i<)<>n\- Marshall. <\ J., Foster v.
Neilson, 2 Pet., 253; [redell, .1.. Ware ,-. Bylton, 3 Dall.,
199. Some treaties are not self-operative. They require
legislative action in order to carry them into effect. Hence
they are contracts in futiiro. A stipulation for the pay-
ment of money t<> a foreign nation presents a rase of this
kind. See Constitution, Art. l, sec. 9, in this connection.
Two th ies as to the obligation to make appropriations:
(1) Treaty being tin; supreme law of the land, Congress
TREATY-MAKING POWER IN THE UNITED STATES 81
has no discretion in the matter; (2) Treaty not complete,
when appropriation is involved, until Congress has ren-
dered it so by appropriation. Debates on conflicting the-
ories :
(1) Jay treaty, 1196. Debate continued daily 7th of March
' to the 7th of April. See the resolution, Benton's Abridge-
ment, vol. 1, page 696.
(O) commercial treaty between the United States and Great
Britain. Ratified, Dec. 22, 1815: 8 U. S. Stat, at Large,
22S. Debates in the House of Representatives, in 1816.
See Benton's Abridgement, vol. 5, pp. 446-546. Also, 3 U. S.
Stat, at Large, 255. Same ground covered as in the debate
of 1796.
(3) 18U. President Tyler. Treaty negotiated with Prussia
and the other states of the Germanic Association of Cus-
toms and Commerce. Rejected by the Senate. Adverse
report of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations
through Senator Choate. Control of trade belongs to
Congress.
(4) 1875 President Grant. Commercial treaty negotiated
with Hawaii. 19th U. S. Stat, at Large, 625. Congress,
Au" 15 1876, passed an act to give effect to the con-
vention. ' 19th U. S. Stat, at Large, 200. Discussion in the
House on the relation of Congress to the treaty power. In
1876, by virtue of the fifth article of the treaty, there was
really no necessity for the discussion of the constitutional
question. This article provided that the treaty should not
take effect until a law to carry it into operation had been
passed by the Congress of the United States.
412 Stidham, Mrs. Clara Hannah (Kerr). The origin and de-
velopment of the United States Senate.
Ithaca, N. Y., Andrus & Church, 1895. vi, 197 p. H em .
" List of works cited " : p. 181-184.
Treaties, plan of Hamilton for, p. 7 ; proposal to give to the
Senate the power to negotiate, p. 8 ; power to negotiate given
to the President and two-thirds of the Senate, p. 8 ; rule im-
posing secrecy on, p. 99; removal of injunction of secrecy
from, p. 101, 135-158; secrecy on treaties, p. 135; manner
of framing, p. 136-140 ; consultation of the Senate prior to
the negotiation of, p. 139-143 ; appointment of special agents
to negotiate, p. 143-144 ; influence of the Senate in the nego-
tiation of, p. 144-145, 153 ; abrogation of, p. 146-147 ; share
of the House in, p. 148-151; 157-158; repeal of laws by
stipulations of a treaty, p. 151 ; acquisition of territory by,
p. 151-155; previous appropriations for the negotiation of
a treaty, p. 152-153 ; commercial regulations in, p. 155-157 ;
with the Indians, considered in open session, p. 136; rati-
fication of Indian, p. 139-140; share of House in Indian,
n 148-149 ; law forbidding the negotiation of Indian, p. 149.
8-31787 JK1166.S82
137190°— 20 6
82 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
413 Story, Joseph. Life and letters of Joseph Story. Edited by
his son, William W. Story.
Boston: diaries G. LitiU. and James Broicn, 1851. 2 v.
front, {port.). 8°.
Power of coding territory by treaty, v. 2, p. 2S6-2S9.
414 Taylor, Hannis. The growth of Hague ideals.
American laio review, J an -Feb., 1906, v. 40: 1-8.
Discusses the treaty-making power as regards arbitration.
Argues the right of the President, by and with the advice
and consent of the Senate, to make such a treaty.
415 Teller, Henry M. Power of Congress over treaties.
(In Congressional record, 60th Cong. 1st sess., v. 42, pt. 7:
6461-0463. )
A brief with regard to the power of Congress to abrogate trea-
ties by an act inconsistent with the treaty. " That Con-
gress can repeal a treaty with a foreign power by an act
can not be questioned, considering the many decisions of
cases to that effect."
Jll.R5,v.42,pt.7
416 Thompson, B. M. The power of the Senate to amend a treaty.
Michigan law review, Apr., 1905, v. 3: 427-441.
"The Constitution gives the President power to make treaties
by and witli the advice and consent of the Senate. The
President has the right to have the very treaty made by
him approved or rejected. When the Senate amends no
action is taken upon the treaty in the form submitted and
the Constitution is thereby violated in spirit if not in the
letter. In assuming to amend a treaty, the Senate exer-
cises a power pot delegated to the Senate and expressly
conferred upon the President."
417 Treaties by government with Indians within State boundaries.
Albany law journal, Dec. 9, 1876, v. 14-' 393-394-
418 Treaties in the House.
Nation, Dec. 18, 1884, v. 39:516-517.
on the commercial treaty question then pending.
AP2.N2,v.39
419 Treaty-making power.
A im rican t conomist, Feb. 14, 1902, v. 29: 75.
HC101.A5,v.29
420 The treaty-making- power.
Sjh rtator, Dec. 29, 1900, v. 85:959-960. AP4.S7,v.85
Contrasts the treaty-making power of the United States and
France, with a verdict in favor of France.
TREATY-MAKING POWER IN THE UNITED STATES
83
421 Treaty tariffs.
Protectionist, Apr., 1902, v. 13: 673-682. HFl750.P8,v,l3
An editorial on Senator Cullom's speech of Jan. 29, 1902.
422 Tucker, Henry St. George. Limitations on the treaty-making
power under the Constitution of the United States.
Boston, Little, Brown, and company, 1915. xxi, U4, p. 2^ cm .
15-8092 JK570.T8
Reviewed in American political science review, Aug. 1915, v.
9: 595-598. JA1.A6.V.9
423 . The treaty-making power under the Constitution.
Article on the treaty-making power under the Constitu-
tion of the United States.
Washington, Govt, print, off., 1911,. 11 p. m™. (U. S.
63d Cong., 2d sess. Senate. Doc. 539)
14-30592 JK573.1914.T7
Also published in North American review, Apr. 1914, v. 199:
560-572. AP2.N7,v.l99
424 The treaty making power under the constitution of
the Confederate states of America.
Virginia law review, May, 1911,, v. 1: 596-603.
425 U. S. Bureau of statistics {Treasury dept.) Reciprocity trea-
ties and agreements between the United States and for-
eign countries since 1850. (From the Summary of com-
merce and finance for Sept. 1901).
[Washington, Govt, print, off., 1901.] Hi, 939-968 p.
426 Reciprocity treaties and agreements between the
United States and foreign countries since 1850.
{In U. S. Bureau of statistics (Treasury dept.) Monthly
summary of commerce and finance of the United States,
Aug., 1904, p. 525-558.) HF105.A5
427 Congress. House. Bills for raising revenue. Report [from]
the committee of conference on the part of the House,
charged with the duty of conferring with the confer-
ence committee appointed by the Senate to consider the
question of privilege raised by the resolution of the
House adopted January 27, 1871, in reference to Senate
bill (S. 1083) "to repeal so much of the act approved July
14, 1870. entitled 'An act to reduce internal taxes, and
for other purposes,' as continues the income tax after
84 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
the 31st day of December, Anno Domini 1869." Feb. 27,
1871.
[Washington, 1871] 13 p. 23 cm . (4.1st Cong., 3d sess.
House. Report 'i.i.) Serial no. 1464
"The Senate conferees submitted a number of citations of
laws originating in the Senate, which they claimed as
precedents favoring the action of the Senate on the bill,
which is the subject of the present difference.
"The commttee have carefully examined these precedents,
and do not see in them any argument to sustain the
Semite views. They seem to be, generally, bills intended
to carry out, in good faith, treaty stipulations and com-
mercial regulations arising under treaties with foreign
countries. It is true that two of the acts cited reduced
existing rates of duty, which reduction was acquiesced in
by the House without raising the question of power. But
it seems to your committee that one or two instances of
waiver cannot be considered as a surrender, on the part
of the House, of a great constitutional privilege," p. 10.
" It seems clear to your committee, therefore, that the
only way to preserve, in its fullness, the power to originate
bills for raising revenue, is to insist upon the right of
the House to originate all bills relating directly to the
revenue, whether imposing or remitting taxes; that the
House should, in the first instance, be the judge of the
manner, the measure, and the time of such impositions
or remissions." p. 12.
428 U. S. Congress. House. Committee on foreign affairs. The
treaty-making power. Report (H. Res. 132) relating to
the treaty-making power. Feb. 14, 1881.
[ Washington, 1881.] 4 V- ®3 cm - {40th Cong., 3d sess., House.
Rept. 2,!'>.) Serial no. 1982
"This resolution affirms that the treaty-making power of the
United States ' does not extend to treaties which affect the
revenue, or require the appropriation of money to execute
them ; but that in such cases the consent of the law-making
power of the Government is required, which includes, as
one of its branches, the House of Representatives . . . The
resolution under consideration — House joint resolution
132 — affirms a proposition which, under existing constitu-
tional provisions, can nol be sustained. Your committee
therefore recommend that the same be not adopted."
Minority report accompanying.
429 Reciprocity treaty between United States
and British provinces. Report [from] the committee on
foreign a Hairs, to whom was referred the joint resolution
for the appointment of commissioners to ascertain and re-
TREATY-MAKING POWER IN THE UNITED STATES 85
port a basis for a reciprocity treaty between the United
States and the British provinces. April 23, 1880.
[Washington, 1880.] 5 p. 23 cm . (46th Cong., 2d sess., House.
Report 1127.) Serial no. 1937
" It is unnecessary to discuss here the question of whether
a commercial treaty can be made, as such, not only because
this is simply a resolution of information, but because no
one has ever disputed that a treaty affecting the tariff could
be made by the President and Senate, if the House of Rep-
resentatives consented thereto. Furthermore, all discus-
sions of treaty powers of the different branches of the gov-
ernment and all questions of treaties may be avoided be-
cause if any reciprocal trade can be established with Can-
ada it could be established either by a treaty with the con-
sent of the House or by mutual law in the nature of a tariff
law fixing the terms of interchange of commodities between
the two countries."
430 Reciprocity treaty between the United
States and the British provinces. Views of the minority.
June 7, 1880.
{Washington, 1880.] 20 p. 23 cm . (46th Cong., 2d sess.,
House Report 1127, pt. 2.)
" This House ought, therefore, to insist that any scheme of
commercial intercourse with other nations involving cus-
toms dues should be initiated, or at all events thoroughly
discussed and agreed to, by itself. They should be fixed,
not by treaty, but by bill."
431 North German Confederation treaty.
Report as to giving notice to the North German Confed-
eration to terminate the treaty of February 22, 1868 (com-
monly known as the naturalization treaty), Feb. 17, 1885.
{Washington, 1885.] 7 p. 23 cm . (48th Cong., 2d sess., House
Report 2590.) Serial no. 2328
432 Committee on the judiciary. Power of the
President to negotiate treaties with foreign governments.
Eeport [by J. R. Tucker] Mar. 3, 1885.
[Washington, 1885.] 20 p. 23 cm . (48th Cong., 2d sess.,
House. Rept. 2680.) Ser. no. 2330
On Jan. 15, 1884, the House agreed to a resolution directing
the Judiciary committee "to report to the House whether
the President, by and with the advice and consent of the
Senate, can negotiate treaties with foreign governments by
w y hich the duties levied by Congress on importations can be
changed or abrogated.
At this time the reciprocity treaty with Mexico, concluded
Jan. 20, 1883, was pending, and when the Judiciary com-
86 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
mittee reported .Mar. 3, L885, a treaty with Spain for re-
ciprocity with Cuba and Porto Rico had been concluded Nov.
18, 1SS4, and a reciprocity treaty with the Dominican Re-
public, I >ec. 4, 1S84, while a treaty had been concluded
with the Hawaiian Islands, Dec. 6, 1884, extending the re-
ciprocity treaty of 1875 for a further term of seven years.
The report of the Conmfittee reads in conclusion : " Your com-
mittee have thus considered the question on the true in-
terpretation of the language of the Constitution; upon the
construction of the Government itself; on the historic de-
velopment of the Constitution from its British original
through the Articles of Confederation to its present form;
on analogy to the British prototype ; on precedents and the
authority; and have come to the conclusion expressed in
the following resolution, which, though the discussion has
taken a wider range, is confined to the question submitted
by the resolution referred to the committee: 'Resolved,
That the President, by and with the advice and consent
of the Senate, can not negotiate treaties with foreign Gov-
ernments by which the duties levied by Congress can be
changed or abrogated, and such treaties to be operative as
law must have the sanction of an act of Congress.' "
433 U. S. Congress. House. Committee on ways and means. Re-
port concerning reciprocity and commercial treaties.
Washington, GovH. print, off., 1896. 6^3 p. 23\™. (5£th
Cong., 1st sess. House. Rept. 2263) Serial no. 3466
Constitutionality of reciprocity legislation, p. 17-19. Ab-
stract of the decision of the Supreme Court on the con-
stitutionality of the reciprocity section of the tariff act of
1890, p. 18-19.
8-28587 HF1731.A5 1896
434 Congress. Senate. Precedents relating to the privi-
leges of the Senate of the United States. Comp. by
George P. Fnrber, clerk to the Committee on privileges
and elections.
"Washington, GovH. print, off., 1893. 350 p. 23\ cm . (52d
Cong., 2d sess. Senate. Mis. doc. 68)
Secret sessions for the consideration of treaties and confi-
dential communications: p. 6-10; Right to demand papers
in the executive files: p. 232-272.
7-4615 JK1170.A4
435 Committee on foreign relations. Compilation
of reports of Committee. 1789-1901, First Congress,
first session, to Fifty-sixth Congress, second session.
Washington, Govt, print, off., 1909. 8 v. pi., maps, plans,
diagr. 23 cm . (56th Cong., 2d sess. Senate. Doc. no.
231, pts 1-8)
Treaties in all volumes; Reciprocity treaties in v. 5 and 8.
2-10168 JX234.A2
TREATY-MAKING POWER IN THE UNITED STATES. 87
436 U. S. — Congress. Senate. Committee on foreign relations.
Jurisdiction of the Senate to act upon reciprocity treaties.
Report from the committee on foreign relations. Dec.
15, 1902.
[Washington, 1902.] 3 p. 23 cm . (57th Cong., 2d sess. Sen-
ate Doc. 47.) Serial no. 4420
A subcommittee of the committee on foreign relations made
the recommendation, which was adopted by the full com-
mittee, that without reference to the merits thereof, each
of the reciprocity treaties under consideration be amended
by the insertion of the following additional provision, " This
treaty shall not take effect until the same shall have been
approved by the Congress."
437 38th Cong., 2d sess. The Congressional Globe.
Washington: C ongressional Globe office, 1865. 2pts. 4°-
During the second session of the thirty-eighth congress a joint
resolution was passed authorizing the President to termi-
nate the Canadian reciprocity treaty and to appoint commis-
sioners to negotiate a new treaty. During the discussion
of the subject in the Senate, Mr. Collamer (p. 209-210) held
that the Canadian treaty was in conflict with the revenue-
raising clause of the Constitution, and Mr. Howe (p. 211-
212) took issue with this view.
438 46th Cong., 2d sess. Congressional record, vol. 10,
[Pt.l.]
Washington: Government printing office, 1880. 4°-
The House Jan. 26, 1880, adopted the following resolution in-
troduced by Mr. Kelley : " Resolved, That it is the sense of
this House that the negotiation by the executive department
of the Government cf a commercial treaty whereby the rates
of duty to be imposed on foreign commodities entering the
United States for consumption should be fixed would, in
view of the provision of section 7 of article 1 of the Consti-
tution of the United States, be an infraction of the Con-
stitution and an invasion of one of the highest prerogatives
of the House of Representatives," p. 394-395, 532.
JKll.R5,v.l0, pt.l
439 60th Cong., 1st sess., 1907-1908. Senate. Power of Con-
gress over treaties . . . Extracts from briefs.
[Washington, Gov't print, off., 1908] 7 p. 23 cm . (60th
Cong., 1st sess. Senate, Doc. 487.) Serial no. 5266
8-35476 JK1081.A5 1908
88 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
440 TJ. S. Dept. of state. Digest of the published opinions of
the attorneys-general, and of the leading decisions of the
federal courts, with reference to international law,
treaties, and kindred subjects. Rev. ed.
Washington, Govt, print, off., 1877. vii, 290 p. 23 cm .
{'i)th Cong., 2d sess. Sen-ate. Ex. doc. 1^6)
Pref. signed: John L. Cadwalader, Department of state.
Treaties: p. 'S21-S6A ; Treaties with particular states: p. 235-
264.
0-7613 JX237.A48 1877
441 — The diplomatic correspondence of the American
revolution: being the letters of Benjamin Franklin, Silas
Deane, John Adams, John Jay. Arthur Lee, William Lee,
Ralph Izard, Francis Dana. William Carmichael, Henry
Laurens, John Laurens, M. de Lafayette, M. Dumas, and
others, concerning the foreign relations of the United
State- during the whole revolution; together with the let-
ters in reply from the secret committee of Congress, and
the secretary of foreign affairs. Also, the entire corre-
spondence of the French ministers, Gerard and Luzerne,
with Congress. Pub. under the direction of the President
of the United States, from the original manuscripts in the
Department of state, conformably to a resolution of Con-
gress, of March 27th, 1818. Ed. by Jared Sparks.
Boston, N. Hale and Gray & Bowen; New York, G. & C. &
n.CarviJJ; \< (<>., etc."] 1829-30. 12 v. 21\™.
5-18.".17 E249.TJ581
442 The diplomatic correspondence of the Ameri-
can revolution. Ed. by Jared Sparks. New ed.
Washington, J. C. Rives, 1857. 6 v. 23\ cm .
The same correspondence, with Sparks' omissions supplied,
was published under direction of Congress by Francis
Wharton as "The revolutionary diplomatic correspondence
of the United States," Washington, 1889.
11 -11013 E249.TJ582
443 The revolutionary diplomatic correspondence
of the United States. Ed. under direction of Congress
by Francis Wharton, with preliminary index, and notes
historical and legal. Pub. in conformity with act of
Congress of August 13, 1888.
Washington, Govt, print, off., 1889. 6 v. 2!f m . (50th Cong.,
1st sess. House. Mis. doc. 603)
Published as a supplement n> Wharton's Digest of the inter-
national law of the United States, taken from documents
TREATY-MAKING POWER IN THE UNITED STATES 89
issued by presidents and secretaries of state [etc.] Wash-
ington, 1886.
Correspondence from the records of the Department of state,
from family archives and from published memoirs. De-
signed to correct, complete and enlarge the Diplomatic cor-
respondence of the American revolution, Boston, 1829-1830,
published by .Tared Sparks under direction of Congress.
"A brief sketch of the life of Francis Wharton. By John
Bassett Moore " : v. 1, p. xi-xxvii.
See Index under Treaties; Treaty of Commerce; Treaty of
peace, v. 6, p. 992.
5-17851 E249.U583
444 U. S. Dept. of state. Foreign trade and treaty regulations.
Letter from the acting secretary of the Treasury, trans-
mitting a copy of a communication from the secretary of
state, submitting an estimate of appropriation for ex-
penses in connection with foreign trade and treaty regu-
lations.
{Washington, Govt, print, off., 1909 f] 4 p. 23 cm . {61st
Cong., 2d sess. House. Doc. 258.)
10-35240 HF3029.A5 1909a
445 Laws, statutes, etc. Indian affiairs. Laws and trea-
ties. Comp. and ed. by Charles J. Kappler.
Washington, Govt, print, off., 1903-13. 3 v. 29\ cm .
Vol. i-ii : 57th Cong., 1st sess. Senate. Doc. 452 ; vol. in : 62d
Cong., 2d sess. Senate. Doc. 719.
Contents. — i. Statutes, executive orders, proclamations, and
statistics of tribes. Comp. to December 1, 1902. — n.
Treaties. — in. Laws. Comp. to December 1, 1913.
3-13067 E93.TJ6995
446 Tariff commission. Reciprocity and commercial trea-
ties.
Washington, Govt, print, off., 1919. 535 p. incl. tables,
diagrs. (1 fold.) 25 cm .
" The commission has had the services, among others, of Stan-
ley K. Hornbeck, Jacob Viner, Clive Day, and Walter B.
Palmer, in the preparation of this report." — " Foreword,"
p. 5.
19-26329 HF1731.A5 1919a
447 Summary of the report on reciprocity and com-
mercial treaties with conclusions and recommendations of
the commission.
Washington, Govt, print, off., 1919. 46 p. 23 cm .
19-26285 HF1731.A5 1919
90 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
148 U. S. Treaties, etc. A compilation of all the treaties be-
tween the United State- and the Indian tribes, now in
force as laws. Prepared under the provisions of the act
of Congress, approved March 3, 1873.
Washington, Curt, print, off., 1873. 1075 p. 28 cm .
Treaties arranged alphabetically by tribes.
9 3113 E95.U545
1 lit - — Compilation of treaties in force. Prepared
under act of July 7. L898.
Washington, Govt, print, off., 1809. xviii, 779 p. 23 cm .
Comp. by Henry L. Bryan, and pub. under the direction of the
Committee on foreign relations, United States Senate.
Issued also as House doc. 276, 55th Cong., 3d sess.
1 9605 JX236 1899
450 — Compilation of treaties in force. Prepared
under resolution of the Senate, of February 11, 1904.
Washingto-n, Govt, print, off., 1904. 996 p. 23\™. (58th
Cong., .''ue politique et litteraire {Revue oleue) Feb. 25, 1905, 5.
8er., V. 3:243-245. AP20.R64,5. ser,v.3
Considerations regarding the arbitration treaties and the
treat; with Santo Domingo.
TREATY-MAKING POWER IN THE UNITED STATES 93
460 Virginia law register. [Editorial.] Can an unconstitutional
law be made constitutional by a treaty? Migratory bird
law.
Virginia law register, Aug. 1018, n. s. v. J/,: 305-307.
461 Webster, Daniel. [Letter to Mr. Everett, Nov. 25. 1842.]
{In Curtis, George Ticknor. Life of Daniel Webster, v. 2, p.
173-175. New York, 1870. 23 rm .)
Commercial treaties, p. 174. E340.W4C92,v.2
461a Wells, William V. The life and public services of Samuel
Adams . . .
Boston, Little, Brown and co., 1866. 3 v. fronts, facsim.
Conflict between the treaty-making power of the President and
Senate and the authority of the House, v. 3, p. 355-356.
13-14097 E302.6.A2W42
462 Wheeler, Everett P. The treaty-making power of the govern-
ment of the United States in its international aspects.
Yale law journal, Jan., 1908, v. 17: 151-161.
Considers the limits to the treaty-making power and also the
duty of Congress in reference to the enforcement of the
provisions of a treaty.
463 Whitney, Edward B. The reciprocity acts of 1890 — Are they
constitutional ?
American register and law review, Mar., 1892, v. 31, {2d
ser. v. 5): 173-188.
The two acts in question : Food act of August 19, 1890. §5 ;
McKinley Tariff Act of October 1, 1890. §3. Constitution-
ality of second decided after writing of this article, Feb.
29, 1S92. (Boyd, Sutton & co. v. U. S. ; H. Herrman Stern-
bach & co., v. U. S., argued November, 1891.) Reciprocity
and retaliation between different States of the Union. See
" Commercial retaliation between the States.," Am. Law
Rev. Feb., 1885; Fire Association v. New York, 119 U. S.,
110. Constitution not violated when a statute expressly or
impliedly repeals a treaty, Chinese exclusion case. 130 U.
S., 581; Whitney v. Robertson, 124 U. S., 190; Head Money
cases, 112 U. S., 580, 599. Laying of a tax is a legislative
act, New Orleans water works v. Louisiana sugar co., 125
U. S., 18, 31. The power to exclude involves the power to
Impose license fees, and that is the power to tax, Hamilton
v. Dillin, 21 Wall, 73. The legislative power cannot be dele-
gated, Wayman v. Southard, 10 Wheat. 1, 42-3; Bank of
U. S. v. Halstead, id. 51, 61 ; In re Rahrer, 140 U. S., 545,
560; People's R. R. v. Memphis R. R., 10 W T all, 38, 50.
Referendum has even been denied, Barto v. Himrod, 8 N. Y.,
94 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
483. This has been allowed however, while the right of
delegation to a subagent has been denied, Locke's Appeal,
72 Pa. St., 491 ; Cooley Const. Lim. Gth ed., p. 140-4G. Ex-
ceptions to rule, as municipal local self-government, Paul v.
Gloucester County, 50 N. J. Law, 585. Or, as power of
detail to be worked out by the judiciary or executive. Way-
man v. Southard, 10 Wheat., 1, 42-3; In re Griner, 16 Wis.,
423. Delegation of power to the President, Paine, J., In re
Oliver, 17 Wis., 681. Delegation of power to the Courts,
Marshall, C. J., in Wayman v. Southard, 10 Wheat. 1. 42.
McKinley act defended first, on authority of the brig.4«rortt,
7 Cranch, 3G2 ; secondly, on statutory precedent. Presi-
dent's power under the non-importation acts not legislative,
but judicial, Martin v. Mott, 12 Wheat., 19; Murray's
Lessee v. Hoboken Land and Improvement co., 18 How.,
272, 280. Usage in constitutional interpretation, Cooley v.
Board of Wardens, 315 ; Prigg v. Pennsylvania, 16 Pet., 621 ;
Lithographic co. v. Sarony 111 U. S. 53, 57; The Lama, 114
U. S., 411. Power to President under embargo acts. Annals
of Congress, April 19, 1808, p. 2, 230 ; Id., April 14, 1808, p.
2. 144; Id. Dec. 21, 1808, p. 295; April 19, 1808, p. 2, 216;
hi. Dec. 21, 1808, p. 259; Jan. 7, 1809, p. 315; Annals of
Congress, April 13. 1S0S, p. 2. 124-5; April 18, 1808, p. 2,
212; April 14, 1S08. p. 2, 129-30; April 19, 1808, p. 2, 200-2;
A) nil i::. 1S0S, p. 2141-4 [?]. See also Annals of Congress,
Dec. 1808; Jan. 1S09, p. 245-319; Congr. Record, Sept. S,
1890, p. 9, 882. (Remarks by Senator Evarts.) See also
Acts of June 19, 1886; Canadian Retaliation Act of Mai*ch
3, 1887. (Paul v. Gloucester co., 50 N. J. Law, 585, 600.)
Senator Evarts questions constitutionality of the McKinley
bill, Cong. Rec. Sept. 8-9, 1S90, p. 9882, 9906. "Can Con-
gress invest the President with its full powers," etc.?
Paine, J., In re Oliver, 17 Wis., 681 ; Marshall, C. J., in
Wayman v. Southard. 10 Wheat., 1 ; U. S. v. Lee, 106. U. S.,
196, 209; Prize cases, 2 Black, 635, GG8-70; Luther v. Bor-
den, 7 How., 1, 43 ; Mr. Justice Story, in Martin v. Mott, 12
Wheat.. 19; Act of July 13, 1861; Hamilton v. Dillin, 21
Wall, 73; Act of March 3, 1S63 ; U. S. v. Klein. 1.", Wall.
128; Bark Grapeshot, 9 Wall. 129; Cross v. Harrison, 1G
How., 164: Leitensderfer r. Webb. 20 How., 176; /■> parte
Milligan, 4 Wall, 1 : Acts of March 3, 1866, R. S., § 2,494;
Food act of August 19. 1890, § 4; Wood on Nnisances,
SS 66-7; Chief Justice Marshall in Cohens v. Virginia, 6
Wheat., 2G4. "It is no answer that such a power may be
abused for there is no power which is not susceptible of
abuse, Mr. Justice Story, in Martin r. Mott, 12 Wheat., 1!>.
President Adams's ad in excess of the powers granted him
by the Xon intercourse Act of 1799 pronounced void, Little
v. Barreme, 2 Cranch, 170.
TKEATY- MAKING POWER IN THE UNITED STATES 95
464 Willson, Beckles. The new America; a study of the imperial
republic.
London, Chapman & Hall, 1903. vii p., 1 I., 268 p. 23 cm .
The new diplomacy : p. 70-85. Includes a discussion of the
relations between the President and Senate as to the treaty-
making powers.
3-9966 E168.W736
465 Wilson, Woodrow, pres. U. S. Congressional government; a
study in American politics.
Boston and New York, Houghton Mifflin company [1913?]
xvi p., It, 3U p., 11. 18 cm .
Semi-executive powers of the Senate in regard to the foreign
policy of the government: p. 49 et seq., 232 et seq.
15-16732 JK1061.W766 1913
466 Woodburn, James Albert. American politics. The American
republic and its government; an analysis of the govern-
ment of the United States, with a consideration of its
fundamental principles and of its relations to the states
and territories. 2d rev., ed.
New York and London, G. P. Putnam's sons, 1916. v, 398
p. diagr. 22 cm .
Treaty-making power : p. 159-164.
17-26185 JK246.W88 1916
467 and Thomas Francis Moran. The citizen and the re-
public; a text-book in government.
New York, Chicago, Longmans, Green and co. [ c 1918] 2
p. 1., iii-viii, 398, ix-xlvi, p., 1 I. front, illus., plates,
facsims., diagrs. 20\ cm .
Treaty-making power : p. 246-248.
18-23061 JK274.W8
468 Woolsey, Theodore S. Treaty-making under the United States
Constitution.
Journal of social science, Dec, 1902, no. 4-0: 83-95.
Discusses the prerogative of the Senate of " advice and con-
sent," and also the issues raised when there is a divergence
of view between the Senate and House as to the treaty-
making power, reference being made to the Jay treaty of
1794, the treaties relating to the Louisiana purchase, the
Gadsen purchase and the Alaska purchase, the treaties of
reciprocity with Great Britain (1875) and the French
treaty of 1831.
Hl.J7,no.40
96 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
409 Wyse, Francis. America, its realities and resources: compris-
ing important details connected with the present social,
political, agricultural, commercial, and financial state of
the country, its laws and customs, together with a review
of the policy of the United States that led to the war of
L812, and peace of 1814 — the "right of search," the Texas
and Oregon questions, etc., etc.
London, T. C. Newly, 184-6. 3 v. 22™.
Considerations regarding extradition by treaty: v. 1, p. 169
.. ltd., 1905-07. 10 v. front*., ill us., plates, ports.,
facsims., diagrs. %S\ cm .
5-35396 E302.F84
478 Hutchinson, Thomas. Plan of union . . . [Dec. 2G, 1754.]
(In Frothingham, Richard. The rise of the republic of the
United States. 10th ed., p. 613-616. Boston, 1910. 21 cm .)
"That the President, by the advice of the Council, may hold
and manage all Indian treaties in which the general in-
terest or welfare of the colonies may be concerned," etc.
p. 014.
E210.F96
479 [Jay, John.] [Circular letter to the states on the binding
nature of treaties. April 13, 1787.]
(In U. S. Continental congress. Journal, v. 12, p. 45-52.
[Philadelphia,] 1787. 22 cm .) JT0.Al,v.l2
Also given in Rawle's " View of the Constitution of the United
States of America," 2d ed., p. 316~323. Philadelphia, 1829.
JK216.R25
484a Tucker, Henry St. George. Limitations on the treaty-making
Jefferson: being his autobiography, correspondence, re-
ports, messages, addresses, and other writings, official
and private. Pub. by the order of the Joint committee
of Congress on the library, from the original manu-
scripts, deposited in the Department of state. With ex-
planatory notes ... by the editor. H. A. Washington.
Washington, Taylor & Maury, 1853-54. 9 v. front, (port.)
4 fold, facsims. %8\ cm .
Treaties under the Confederation, v. 1, p. 55-60, 62-67,
349-352, 358-361, 370-374, 457-459, 460, 538-540, 557; v.
9, p. 286; Treaties paramount to state laws, v. 3, p. 399-406.
6-7150 E302.J464
481 The writings of Thomas Jefferson; collected and ed.
by Paul Leicester Ford.
A. w York [etc.'] G. /'. Putnam's sons, 1892-99. 10 v. 23V" 1 .
Debate In Congress, June 8, 1770. and arguments of J. Adams,
Lee, Wythe, ami others, as tn Independence and treating
with European powers: v. i, p. 21-23; Treaties under the
Confederation, v. 1, p. 77 84, 86 94, v. 4. p. 54-59, 79-82, 141-
111. 198 -HI; Treaties paramount to state laws, v. 6, p.
41 47.
2-. r .c,r,<; E302.J466
TREATY-MAKING POWER IX THE UNITED STATES 99
482 Madison, James. [Letter] to Edmund Randolph. Philadel-
phia. May — . 1783.
(In The papers of James Madison, v. 1, p. 533-538. Washing-
ton, 1840. 24 cm .)
Largely on commercial treaties.
JKlll.M2,v.l
483 Miller, Samuel Freeman. Lectures on the Constitution of the
United States.
New York and Albany, Banks and brothers, 1893. xxi, 765
p. 24 cm .
Treaties negotiated by the Continental Congress : p. 48-55 ;
The consular convention with France a construction of the
treaty-making power : p. 55.
2-19694 JK241.M66
484 South Carolina. Constitution. 1776.
(In Poore, B. P. The federal and state constitution, Colonial
charters, and other organic laws of the United States, 2d
ed. v. 2. p. 1615-1620. Washington, 1878. 29$ cm .)
xxvi. That the president and commander-in-chief shall have
no power to make war or peace, or enter into any final
treaty, without the consent of the general assembly and
legislative council : p. 1619.
JK18 1878,v.2
484a Tucker, Henry St. George. Limitations on the treaty-making
power under the Constitution of the United States.
Boston, Little, Brown, and company, 1915. xxi, 444 V-
24\ cm .
The Treaty power under the Articles of Confederation as
strong as under the Constitution. The chief difference be-
ing that under the former there was no judicial tribunal to
enforce treaties : p. 56-72.
15-8092 JK570.T8
485 U. S. Continental congress. Articles of confederation — 1777.
(In Preston, H. W. ed. Documents illustrative of American
history, 1606-1863, with introductions and references, p.
218-231. New York, 1886. 23 cm .)
"Article ix. The United States in Congress assembled, shall
have the sole and exclusive right and power of determining
on peace and war, except in the cases mentioned in the sixth
article — of sending and receiving ambassadors — entering
into treaties and alliances, provided that no treaty of com-
merce shall be made whereby the legislative power of the
respective States shall be restrained from imposing such
imposts and duties on foreigners, as their own people are
subjected to, or from prohibiting the exportation or importa-
tion of any species of goods or commodities whatsoever"
etc., p. 223-224. E173.P93
100 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
486 U. S. Continental congress. Journal of the United States in
Congress assembled : containing the proceedings from the
sixth day of November, 1786, to the fifth day of No-
vember, 1787. Vol. xii.
{Philadelphia M, DCC, LX XXVII. 255 [9] p. 22 cm .
Resolutions affirming the binding nature of treaties made by
Congress on the states : p. 32-33 ; Draught of a letter by the
secretary for foreign affairs (Mr. Jay) to accompany the
resolutions : p. 45-52 ; Treaties containing the most favored
nation clause, and request to the Commonwealth of Vir-
ginia : p. 206-207. JA10.Al,v.l2
487 Journals of Congress : containing their proceed-
ings from September 5, 1774, to [November 3, 1788]
Published by authority. Volume i. [ — xiii.]
From FolweWs press. Philadelphia, 1800-01, 13 v. 21-
22 cm .
15-14439 JA10.A2
The Library of Congress has other editions.
488 Secret journals of the acts and proceedings of
Congress, from the first meeting thereof to the dissolution
of the Confederation, by the adoption of the Constitution
of the United States. Pub. under the direction of the
President of the United States, conformably to resolution
of Congress of March 27, 1818, and April 21, 1820.
Boston, T. B. Wait, 1820-21. j. v. 22\™.
Contents. — v. 1. Domestick affairs. History of the Confed-
eration. — v. 2—4. Foreign affairs.
11-2S751 J10.A35
489 Dept. of state. The diplomatic correspondence of
the United States of America, from the signing of the
definitive treaty of peace, 10th September, 1783, to the
adoption of the Constitution, March 4, 1789. Being the
letters of the presidents of Congress, the secretary for for-
eign affairs — American ministers at foreign courts, for-
eign ministers near Congress — reports of committees of
Congress, and reports of the secretary for foreign affairs
on various letters and communications; together with
letters from individuals on public affairs. Pub. under
the direction of the secretary of state, from the original
manuscripts in the Department of state, conformably to
an act of Congress, approved May 5, 1832.
'Washington, Printed by F. P. Blair, 1833-34. 7 v. 2Uj m .
10-9018 JX233.A2
TREATY-MAKING POWER IN THE UNITED STATES 101
III. AS CONSIDERED IN THE FEDERAL CONVENTION AND EUROPE
BEFORE THE ADOPTION OF THE CONSTITUTION
490 Butler,- Charles Henry. The treaty-making power of the
United States.
New fork, The Banks law pub. co., 1902. 2 v. 21f m .
Proceedings of the Constitutional Convention of 1787 relating
to treaties and the treaty-making power of the Federal gov-
ernment, v. 1, part 2, p. 285-338. Proceedings of the Consti-
tutional Conventions of the several states, in so far as they
relate to the treaty-making power of the national govern-
ment, p. 339-370.
The treaty-making powers as a factor in the great national
debate of 1787-8, p. 371-392.
2-7104 JK570.B85
491 ■ Treaties, their making and enforcement. (2d ed.)
Washington, D. C, J. Byrne <& company, 1916. xxxii, 663
p. 23\ cm .
The Federal convention: p. 43-52; Discussion preceding the
adoption of the Constitution : p. 53-66.
16-6404 JX4165.C8 1916
492 Elliot, Jonathan, ed. The debates in the several state conven-
tions on the adoption of the federal Constitution, as recom-
mended by the general convention at Philadelphia, in
1787. Together with the Journal of the federal conven-
tion, Luther Martin's letter, Yates's minutes, Congres-
sional opinions, Virginia and Kentucky resolutions of '98-
'99, and other illustrations of the Constitution ... 2d
ed., with considerable additions. Collected and rev. from
contemporary publications. Pub. under the sanction of
Congress.
Philadelphia, J. B. Lippincott company, 1896. 5 v. 24 cm .
Vol. 5 has title: Debates on the adoption of the federal Con-
stitution, in the convention held at Philadelphia, in 1787;
with a diary of the debates of the Congress of the Confed-
eration ; as reported by James Madison . . . Rev. and newly
arranged by Jonathan Elliot . . . Vol. v. Supplementary to
Elliot's Debates . . .
Reprint of edition of 1836-45.
12-14217 JK141 1836b
493 Ellsworth, Oliver. The landholder. (Oliver Ellsworth), in
the Connecticut Courant.
(In Scott, E. H., ed. The Federalist and other Constitutional
papers, v. 2, p. 566-603. Chicago, 1894. 25 0In .)
As to dangers from the treaty power, p. 578.
JK154 1894
102 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
4D4 Ellsworth, Oliver. The letters of a landholder. Written by
Oliver Ellsworth, and printed in the Connecticut Courant
and the American Mercury. November, 1787-Maivh. 1788.
i in Ford, Paul Leicester, ed. Essays on the Constitution of
the United States, p. L35 202. Brooklyn, 1892. 24i cm .)
As to the dangers from the treaty power, p. 1G5.
JK171.F72
495 The Federalist. 1787-1788. Xo. 64, by Jay. is on the treaty-
making power of the Senate; and no. 75, by Hamilton,
on the treaty-making power of the President. For other
observations on the treaty-making power, see edition with
index.
Numerous editions of "The Federalist" are noted in Paul
Leicester Ford's "Bibliography of the Constitution" printed
in George Ticknor Curtis's "Constitutional Bistory of the
United States," v. 2, p. 708 766. New York, 1896. Editionsis-
sued since those given in Ford's list are those of Charlottes-
ville, Ya., 189."), abridged by Win. A. Falconer ; New York. 189S,
ed. by Paul Leicester Ford ; and Washington, 1901, with an
introduction by K. <;. Bourne; New York, 1901, with a spe-
cial introduction by Goldwin Smith; New York. 1902, ed. by
Henry Cabol I. "due. French ed., by Gaston Je/.e, Paris, 1902 ;
and Selections, ed. with an introduction by William Bennett
Munro, Cambridge, 1914.
496 Hamilton, Alexander. Constitution of governments by the
people of the United State- of America. First draught
of Hamilton. 1787.
(In The Works of Alexander Hamilton, ed. by Henry Cabot
Lodge, v. 1, p. 334-353. New York & London, 1SS5. 23* cm .)
E302.H23,v.l
"The Semite shall exclusively have the power of declaring
war. No treaty shall be made without their advice and
consent," etc. page 33S ; "All treaties, conventions, and agree-
ments with foreign nations shall he made by him, [the
President | by and with the advice and consent of the
Senate," p. 342; "The laws of the United States and the
treaties winch have been made under the articles of the
Confederation, and which shall be made under this Consti-
tution, shall be the supreme law of the land, and shall he
so construed by the courts of the several States," p. 348;
"All treaties, contracts, and engagements of the United
States of America, under the Articles of Confederation and
Perpetual Union, shall have equal validity under this Con-
stitution," p. •"'>] : "No State shall enter Into a treaty, alli-
ance, or contract with another, or with a foreign power,
without the consent of the United States," p. 351.
TREATY-MAKING POWER IN THE UNITED STATES 103
497 Hamilton, Alexander. Propositions for a constitution of gov-
ernment.
(In The Works of Alexander Hamilton, edited by Henry
Cabot Lodge, v. 1, p. 331-333. New York & London, 1885.
. 23* cm .)
"The Governor ... to have, with the advice and approbation
of the Senate, the power of making all treaties," etc., p. 332 ;
" The Senator to have the sole power of declaring tear — the
power of advising and approving all treaties," etc., p. 332.
E302.H23,v.l
498 [Iredell, James.] Answers to Mr. Mason's objections to the
new constitution recommended by the late convention at
Philadelphia. By Marcus.
(In McRee, Griffith J. Life and correspondence of James
Iredell, v. 2, p. 1S6-215. New York, 185S. 23* cm .)
Treaty-making power, p. 202-203 ; Treaties of commerce, p.
205-206.
Iredell's " Answers to Mr. Mason's objections " is also re-
printed in Paul Leicester Ford's " Pamphlets on the Consti-
tution of the United States," p. 333-370 (JK171.F71), and
in E. H. Scott's " The Federalist and other constitutional
papers" v. 2, p. SS5-917 (JK154 1894).
E302.6.I7M17
499 [Lee, Richard Henry.] Observations leading to a fair examina-
tion of the system of government, proposed by the late
convention; and to several essential and necessary altera-
tions in it. In a number of letters from the Federal
Farmer to the Republican.
[New York] : Printed [by Thomas Greenleaf] in the year
1787. 40 p. 12°.
Reprinted in Paul Leicester Ford's " Pamphlets on the Con-
stitution of the United States," p. 277-325 (JK171.F71), and
in E. H. Scott's " The Federalist and other constitutional
papers," v. 2, p. S39-880 (JK154 1S94).
Treaties, p. 29-30, 34.
500 [ ] An additional number of letters from the Federal
farmer to the Republican; leading to a fair examination
of the system of government, proposed by the late con-
vention; to several essential and necessary alterations in
it; and calculated to illustrate and support the princi-
ples and positions laid down in the preceding letters.
[n. p.~] Printed in the year 1788. 1 p. I., p. [xliii\-xliv ,
[4-5]-181. 17 cm .
On the treaty-making power, p. 98-100 ; Argument that " the
legislature has a proper control over the president and
senate in settling commercial treaties," p. 99-100.
10-14724 JK146.L4
104 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
501 Madison, James. Debates on the adoption of the Federal Con-
stitution in the convention held at Philadelphia, in 1787;
with a diary of the debates of the Congress of the Con-
federation ; . . . Revised and newly arranged by Jona-
than Elliot. Complete in one volume. Vol. v. Supple-
mentary to Elliot's Debates. Published under the sanction
of Congress.
Washington: Printed for the editor, 181+5. xxii, 61+.1 p.
U\ cm >
See index under " Treaty."
JK141 1836,v.5
502 The papers of James Madison, . . . now published
from the original manuscripts, deposited in the Depart-
ment of State, by direction of the joint library commit-
tee of Congress, under the superintendence of Henry D.
Gilpin.
Washington: Langtree & CSullivan, 181+0. 3 v. Facsimi-
les. 21+ cm .
See index, v. 3, under "Treaty."
JK111.M2
503 Massachusetts. Convention, 1788. Debates, resolutions and
other proceedings, of the convention of the commonwealth
of Massachusetts convened at Boston, on the 9th of Janu-
ary, 1788, and continued until the 7th of February fol-
lowing, for the purpose of assenting to and ratifying the
Constitution recommended by the Grand Federal Con-
vention. Together with the yeas and nays on the decision
of the grand question. To which the Federal Constitu-
tion is prefixed.
Boston, Adams and Nourse, 1788. 219 p. 19 cm .
Treaties: p. 107, 113, 156.
9-21475 JK161.M4 1788
504 Same.
Boston, W. White, printer to the commonwealth, 1856. vii
p., 4 l, U% V- n cm .
3-3147 JK161.M4 1856
505 New York {State) Convention, 1788. The debates and pro-
ceedings of the Convention of the state of New- York,
assembled at Poughkeepsie, on the 17th June, 1788. To
deliberate and decide on the form of federal government
TREATY-MAKING POWER IN THE UNITED STATES 105
recommended by the General convention at Philadelphia,
on the 17th September, 1787. Taken in shorthand.
New-York, Printed and sold by F. Childs, 1788. 1 p. I., ii,
\syiu V- 21cm -
'Amendment proposed, " Resolved, as the opinion of this com-
mittee, that no treaty ought to operate so as to alter the
constitution of any state; nor ought any commercial treaty
to operate so as to abrogate any law of the United States, "
p. 140.
A reprint has been issued with title : The debates and pro-
ceedings of the constitutional convention of the state of
New York . . . Published by the Vassar brothers institute.
Poughkeepsie, N. Y., 1905.
5-35342 JK161.N7 1905
506 Patterson, William. [Plan of government. June 15, 1787.]
[In Madison, James. Debates on the adoption of the federal
constitution, p. 191-193. Washington, 1845. 24 cm . (Elliot's
debates, v. 5.)]
Resolutions favoring a revision, correction and enlargement of
the Articles of Confederation.
JK141 1836,v.5
507 Pennsylvania. Historical society. Pennsylvania and the fed-
eral Constitution, 1787-1788. Ed. by John Bach Mc-
Master and Frederick D. Stone.
[Philadelphia] Pub. for the subscribers by the HistoHcal
society of Pennsylvania [Lancaster, Inquirer printing and
publishing co., printers'] 1888. viii, 80S p. 15 port. (incl.
front.) %5\ cm .
Treaties of commerce by the old Congress, p. 455 ; how af-
fected by laws of the United States and constitutions of
states, p. 463; objections to the power of the president and
senate in making treaties, p. 476 ; amendment proposed re-
garding treaties, p. 564.
7-8550 JK161.P4 1888
508 Pinckney, Charles.- Plan of a federal constitution. May 29,
1787.
(In Madison, James. Debates on the adoption of the federal
Constitution, p. 129-132. Washington, 1845. 24 cm . (El-
liot's debates, v. 5.) JK141 1836,v.5
"Art. vn. — The Senate shall have the sole and exclusive power
to declare war, and to make treaties, and to appoint am-
bassadors and other ministers to foreign nations, and judges
of the supreme court," p. 131.
See Jameson, J. F. " Studies in the history of the Federal con-
vention of 1787," reprinted from the Annual Report of the
American Historical Association for 1902, v. 1, p. 87-167,
for discussions of the authenticity of the text of the Pinck«
ney plan.
106 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
50!> [R ainsa y> David.] An address to the freemen of South-Caro-
lina, on the subject of the Federal Constitution, proposed
by the convention, which met in Philadelphia, May 1787.
Charleston: Printed by Bowen and co., [1787 ?~\ s.' p. 16°.
Defense of the treaty-making clause, p. 7-8.
Ramsay's address is reprinted in Paul Leicester Ford's " Pam-
phlets on the Constitution of the United States," p. 371-380,
(JK171.F71) and in E. H. Scott's "The Federalist and
other constitutional papers," v. 2, p. 918-924. (JK154
1894).
510 Randolph, Edmund. [Plan of government. May 29, 1787.]
(/// Madison, James. Debates on the adoption of the federal
constitution, p. 127-128. Washington, 1845. 24 cm . (El-
liot's debates, v. 5.) JK141 1836,v.5
No clause on the treaty-making power in particular. The na-
tional legislature should be empowered with the legislative
rights vested in Congress by the Confederation and have the
authority to negative any laws passed by the several states
contravening any treaty subsisting under the authority of
the Union. A national executive should be instituted and
have, besides a general authority to execute the national
laws, the executive rights vested in Congress by the Con-
federation.
511 Richardson, Hamilton P. The journal of the federal conven-
tion of 17s7 analyzed; the acts and proceedings thereof
compared; and their precedents cited; in evidence . . .
that . . . Congress have general power to provide for the
common defense and general welfare of the United States;
direct taxes are taxes direct to the several states . . . and
the limits of the Union are coextensive with the bounds
of America.
San Francisco, The Murdoch- press, 1899. 244 P- 8°.
Dec. 7, 99-91 JK146.R52
512 Rowland, Kate Mason. The life of George Mason, 1725-1792,
including his speeches, public papers, and correspondence;
with an introduction by General Fitzhugh Lee.
X, w York, London. ,su, nil, til. 113, 130
132, 134, no. 149, 450, 152.
Mason's "Objections to this constitution of government," v. 2,
p. ::s7 390, which include his objection to the grant of the
treaty-making power, is also printed in Paul Leicester Ford's
"Pamphlets on the Constitution of the United States," p.
327 332, and in E. II. Scott's "The Federalist and other
constitutional papers," v. 2, p. 881-884.
12-36679 E302.6.M45R8
TREATY-MAKING POWER IN THE UNITED STATES 107
513 Spear, Samuel T. Treaties and the federal convention.
Albany law journal, -July 10, 1880, v. 22: 25-28.
Study based largely on the reports of the Federal Convention
in the Madison Papers. Constitution, Art. 1, sec. 10. deny-
ing the right to make treaties to the States. See Story's
Constitution, § 1403.
Same i. e. Story's § 1403, the matter of compacts between
States ; also, Holmes v. Jennison. 14 Pet., 540, and the
People v. Curtis, 59 N. Y., 321. Ability of Congress to
guarantee its own stipulations. Story's Const. § 1838.
Treaties as a part of " the supreme law of the land " are
placed under the cognizance of the judicial power of the
United States. Sec. 25, of the Judiciary act of Sept. 24,
1789, 1 U. S. Stat, at Large, 73. Rev. Stat, of the U. S., sec.
709.
514 U. S. Bureau of rolls and library. Documentary history of
the Constitution of the United States of America, 1786-
1870. Derived from records, manuscripts, and rolls de-
posited in the Bureau of rolls and library of the Depart-
ment of state.
Washington, Department of state, 180 %-1905 ' . 5 v. Sl\ cm .
Vol. in has an appendix (not included in the original edition)
"Additional notes by Madison for the introduction to his
notes of debates in the Federal convention " : p. 796a~796o ;
also, a " Special index " : p. 797-904.
2-101G4/5 JK111.A52
515 Constitutional convention, 1787. Journal, acts and pro-
ceedings of the convention, assembled at Philadelphia.
Monday, May 11, and dissolved Monday, September 17,
1787, which formed the Constitution of the United States.
Boston, T. B. Wait, 1819. 510 p. 22h cm .
Published under the direction of the President of the United
States, conformably to a resolution of Congress of March
27, 1818.
9-21623 JK141 1819
516 Journal of the Federal convention, kept by
James Madison. Reprinted from the ed. of 1810, which
was published under direction of the United States gov-
ernment from the original manuscripts. A complete in-
dex specially adapted to this ed, is added. Ed. by E. H.
Scott.
Chicago, Scott, Foresman and co., 1898. 2 v. 25 cm .
See Index under Treaties.
1-9289 JK141 1898
108 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
617 XJ. S. Constitutional convention, 1787. The journal of the de-
bates in the convention which framed the Constitution of
the United States. May-September, 1787, as recorded by
James Madison; ed. by Gaillard Hunt.
New York and London, G. P. Putnam's sons, 1908, 2 v.
5 facsim. (2 fold.) 21 cm .
8-20180 JK141 1908
618 The records of the Federal convention of 1787,
ed. by Max Farrand.
New Haven, Yale university press, 1911. 3 v. 26 cm .
For discussions of Treaty-making power see Index by clauses
of Constitution, Art. II, Sec. 2, clause 2: p. 643-644.
11-5506 JK141 1911
619 Report of the committee of detail. Aug. 6, 1787.
(In Madison, James. Debates on the adoption of the Federal
Constitution, p. 376-381. Washington, 1845, 24 cm . (Elliot's
debates, v. 5.)
"Art. ix.— Sec. 1, The Senate of the United States shall have
power to make treaties, and to appoint ambassadors, and
judges of the supreme court." p. 379.
"Art. xtt. — No state shall . . . enter into any treaty, al-
liance, or confederation; nor grant any title of nobility":
P- 381. JK141 1836,v.5
520 Secret proceedings and debates of the convention
assembled at Philadelphia, in the year 1787. for the purpose
of forming the Constitution of the United States of
America. From the notes taken by the late Robert Yates.
M' ashing ton, Printed for G. Templeman, 1836. 308 p.
23 cm .
First published in 1821.
9-21547 JK141 1836b
521 Same.
Washington, Govt, print, off.. WOO. 208 p. 23 cm . (00th
Conn., lil sess. Senate. Doc. 728)
9-35422 JK141 1909
TREATY-MAKING POWER IN THE UNITED STATES 109
522 Virginia. Convention, 1788. Debates and other proceedings
of the Convention of Virginia, convened at Richmond, on
Monday the 2d day of June, 1788, for the purpose of de-
liberating on the Constitution recommended by the grand
Fe'deral convention. To which is prefixed, the federal
Constitution.
Petersburg : Printed, by Hunter and Prentis, m,dgc,lxxxviii
[i. e. 1788]-89. 3 v. in 1. %l cm .
Treaty-making clause considered, v. 3, p. 80-95 ; Proposed
amendment regarding the treaty-making power, v. 3, p. 222.
The nature of the treaty-making power is also considered in
the discussion of the navigation of the Mississippi, which
runs through the last part of v. 1 and the greater part of
v. 2.
7-7114 JK161.V8 1788a
523 Same. Taken in short hand, by David Robert-
son of Petersburg. 2d ed.
Richmond: Printed at the Enquirer's press, for Ritchie d?
Worsley and Augustine Davis, 1805. viii, 1^77 p. 21% cm .
See p. 104-105, 354-367, 474 ; also, the discussion of the navi-
gation of the Mississippi, p. 115-261.
JK161.V8 1805
524 ["Webster, Noah] An examination into the leading principles
of the Federal constitution proposed by the late Conven-
tion . . . with answers to the principal objections that have
been raised against the system.
Philadelphia: printed and sold by Prichard <& Hall, 1787.
65 p.
Discussion of the constitution and powers of the Senate, p.
16-21.
Also printed in Paul L. Ford's " Pamphlets on the Constitution
of the United States," p. 25-65. Brooklyn, N. Y., 1888.
JK171.F71
IV. AS CONSIDERED IN WRITINGS ON THE CONSTITUTION
525 Ames, Herman V. The proposed amendments to the Constitu-
tion of the United States during the first century of its
history.
(In American historical association. Annual report for the
year 1896. v. 2, Washington, 1897. 8°.)
•* Foreign affiairs — the treaty-making power," p. 267-269, 308,
309, 310, 319, 323, 413, 414.
E172.A60 1896,v.2
110 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
526 Baker, Andrew J. Annotated Constitution of the United
State-.
Chicago, Callaghan and company, 1891, Ixxxvii, 279 p.
■• i
Treaties and the treaty power: p. 58, 115-117, 133, 17.'?, 174.
2-9008 JK241.B16
527 Boutwell, George Sewall. The Constitution of the United
States at the end of the first century.
Boston, I>. C. Heath & <<>.. is!).',, xviii, J,12 />. 21 cm .
Treaties: p. 2SG-296, 352, 354, Mil.
9 21537 JK241.B77
528 Bryant, Edwin Eustace. The Constitution of the United
States, with notes of the decisions of the Supreme court
thereon, from the organization of the court till October,
11)00.
Madison, Wis,, The Democrat printing company, 1901. x,
4J8 p. ffl cm .
Treaties and the treaty power: p. 58, 115-117, 133, 173, 174.
1-31152 JK241.B9
529 Bryce, James Bryce, viscount. The American commonwealth.
New ed., completely rev. throughout, with additional
chapters.
New York, The Macmillan com pang, 1910. 2 v. 21 cm .
Treaties, see Index.
10-26933 JK246.B9 1910
530 Calhoun, John C. A disquisition on government and a dis-
course on the constitution and government of the United
States. Ed. by Richard K. Cralle.
Charleston, S. C: Walker and James, 1851. viii, J/,06 p.
23<>". [His Work*. V. 1.)
Treaty-making power; p. 201 et seq.
E338.C13,v.l
531 Corwin, Edward Samuel. The doctrine of judicial review, its
legal and historical basis, ami other essays .
Princeton^ Princeton university press/ [etc., etc."] 1914. r, i
p.. i /.. /;; p. ,ii rm .
"Seme possibilities in the way of treaty-making:" p. 101-171.
14-19188 JK1541.C7
TREATY-MAKING POWER IN THE UNITED STATES 111
532 Coxe, Brinton. An essay on judicial power and unconstitu-
tional legislation, being a commentary on parts of the
Constitution of the United States.
Philadelphia, Kay and brother, 1893. xvi, 415 p. 23\ cm .
'Influence of the treaty of peace with Great Britain on the Con-
stitution of the United States, p. 274-284; Of the origin of
the doctrine that a treaty may be part of the law of the
land of a state, p. 284-285; Of the meaning of the words,
" the law of the land," in the first resolution and the federal
letter of Congress, p. 287-290; The treaty of peace with
Great Britain a part of the law of the land, p. 289-290;
The federal letter of Congress, April 13, 1787, p. 387-395.
9-235S3 JK1541.C8
533 Curtis, George Ticknor. Constitutional history of the United
States from their declaration of independence to the close
of the civil war.
New York, Harper & brothers, 1889-96. 2 v. front, (v. 2,
• port.) 23\ cm .
Treaties and the treaty-making power : v. 1, p. 219, 422, 457,
463, 465, 468, 553, 554, 579, 581, 589, 596.
5-29962 JK116.C85
534 Duer, William Alexander. A course of lectures on the consti-
tutional jurisprudence of the United States. 2d ed.,
rev., enl.
Boston, Little, Brown and company, I860, xxii p., 1 Z.,
545 p. 20 cm .
The powers to make treaties, etc. p. 227-238.
12-13111 JK211.D8
535 Outlines of the constitutional jurisprudence of the
United States.
New-York, Collins and Hannay, 1833. xxiii, [25]-249 p.
18 cm .
Treaties : p. 65-66, 135-141, 193.
9-21742 JK221.D85
536 Farrar, Timothy. Manual of the Constitution of the United
States of America.
Boston, Little, Brown, and company, 1867. xii, 532 p.
23 cm .
Treaty-making power: p. 333, 447-451.
9-21633 JK246.F24
112 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
537 Hare, John Inncs Clark. American constitutional law.
Boston, Little, Brown, and company, 1889. 2 v. 2)+\ cm .
Regulation of commerce, p. 427 et seq; Power to make treaties,
p. 15, 171 ; Power to regulate commerce may be exercised by
treaty, p. 435. Law contrary to a treaty binding on the
courts, p. 439, 502.
9-21642 JK241.H28
538 Harrison, Benjamin, pres. U. S. This country of ours.
New York, C. Scribner > 8 sons, 1897. 3 p. I., [iii]-xxiv,
360 p. 19 cm .
Treaty-making power: p. 134-136; Participation of House in
treaties : p. 136-141. See also p. 121-123, 250, 281, 284.
4-3S66 JK424.H3
539 Hart, Albert Bushnell. Introduction to the study of federal
government.
Boston, Ginn & company, 1891. x, 11-200 p. 23\ cm .
{Harvard historical ?nonographs, no. 2)
Treaties as basis of federation: p. 15, 17, 19; Foreign powers:
p. 165-166.
5-1610 JC353.H24
540 Hoist, Hermann Eduard von. The constitutional law of the
United States of America. Authorized ed. Tr. by Alfred
Bishop Mason.
Chicago, III., Gallaghan & company, 1887. v p., 1 I., 369 p.
24 C '' H .
Treaty-power, p. 200 et seq.
President before negotiating a treaty may ask the Senate for
advice ; his right to do so has never been disputed, p. 201 ;
Treaty-power cannot be unlimited, p. 202 ; A law can be re-
pealed by a treaty (Foster v. Neilson, 2 Peters, 253) as well
as a treaty by a law, p. 202 (The Cherokee Tobacco, 11 Wal-
lace, 616) ; If a treaty and a law are in opposition, their
respective dates must decide whether the one or the other is
to be regarded as repealed, p. 202 (Foster v. Neilson, 2 Pe-
ters, 253, 314; Doe v. Braden, 16 Howard, 635) ; Relation
between the treaty -power and the legislative-power, p. 203-
204; Commercial treaties, p. 204-205; When stipulations in
a treaty are of 11x> nature of a contract, the contract must
be fulfilled by the action of the legislature (or executive),
p. 205-206 (Foster v. Neilson, 2 Peters, 253).
9-21111 JK31.H75
TREATY-MAKING POWER IN" THE UNITED STATES 113
541 Kent, James. Commentaries on American law. 12th ed. Ed.
by O. W. Holmes, jr. 14th ed. Ed. by John M. Gould.
Boston, Little, Brown, and company, 1896. 4 *>. 21 l k cm .
Part i. Of the law of nations: Treaties of peace: p. 165-177
' (200-211); Of territories ceded or acquired: p. 177-179
(211-214) ; Part n. Of the government and constitutional
jurisprudence of the United States ; The treaty-making
power, p. 284-2S7, (34G-350).
2-20193
542 McClain, Emlin. A selection of cases on constitutional law.
Boston, Little, Brown and company, 1900. xxxi, 1080 p.
%lf m .
The powers of the executive: Sec. II. Treaties: p. 581-590.
Cases cited: Haver v. Yaker, 9 Wallace, 32 (1869). The Peo-
ple, ex rel. The Attorney-General v. Gerke, 5 Cal. 381
(1855). Head money cases, 112 U. S., 580, (1884).
May 17. 1900-69 JK240.M12
543 Same. 2d ed.
Boston, Little, Brown, and company, 1909. xli, 1297 p.
21±¥ m .
9-27928 JK265.M3
544 Miller, Samuel Freeman. Lectures on the Constitution of the
United States.
Neio York and Albany, Banks and brothers, 1893. xxi,
765 p. 21f m .
Treaties negotiated hy the Continental Congress : p. 48-55 ; The
consular convention with France a construction of the treaty-
making power : p. 55 ; Power to make treaties : p. 167-168,
214-216, 375, 578-579 ; Treaties providing for payment of
moneys : p. 181-184 ; Principal treaties reviewed : p. 220-226 ;
Commercial treaties : p. 225-226 ; Cases arising under
treaties: p. 321-325.
2-19694 JK241.M66
545 Noailles, Jules Charles Victurnien due de. Cent ans de re-
publique aux Etats-Unis.
Paris, 0. Levy, 1886-89. 2 v. 23 cm .
Attributions executives du Senat : v. 1, p. 361-391.
2-16065 JK246.N74
546 Paschal, George Washington. The Constitution of the United
States defined and carefully annotated. With an ap-
pendix, supplement, and index thereto. [3d ed.]
Washington, D. C ., W. H. Morrison, 1882. xx, xxa^xxc,
\xxi\-lxxii, 61tlf. p. 21 cm .
Treaties: p. 373-374, 393, 412, 463-464.
2-14916 JK241.P27 1882
137190°— 20 8
114 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
547 Patterson, Christopher Stuart. The United States and the
States under the Constitution. 2d ed., with notes and
references to additional authorities, by Robert P. Reeder.
Philadelphia, T. & J . U*. Johnson & co., 1904-. xli, SJfl p.
$4 cm .
Supremacy of treaties: p. 238-239.
4-31001 JK314.P3 1904
548 Pomeroy, John Norton. An introduction to the constitutional
law of the United States. Especially designed for stu-
dents, general and professional. 9th ed., rev. and enl., by
Edmund H. Bennett.
Boston and New York, Houghton, Mifflin and company,
1886. xxxviii, 709 p. 23 cm .
President's power to make treaties : p. 118 ; Acquisition of ter-
ritory by treaties: p. 396-39S; The power of the President
to manage the foreign and international relations of the
United States: p. 563-572; Cases arising under treaties:
p. 631-632.
" The Constitution places no express limits whatever upon
the subjects, conditions, or contents of treaties. The Presi-
dent shall have power to make treaties. . . . Congress,
having no power over them, can not abrogate or modify
them. In general, therefore, the President, with the consent
of the Senate, may enter into any species of treaty known in
the intercourse of nations, any species known to the inter-
national law. The genus ' treaties ' includes all the usual
kinds and sorts " : p. 566.
9-21072 JK241.P78 1886
549 Rawle, William. A view of the Constitution of the United
States of America. 2d ed.
Philadelphia, P. H. Nicldin, 1829. viii, [9]-349 p. 24 cm .
Of the treaty making power: p. 63-76, 316-324.
9-25931 JK216.R25
550 Sergeant, Thomas. Constitutional law. Being a collection of
points arising upon the Constitution and jurisprudence of
the United States, which have been settled, by judicial
decision and practice.
Philadelphia, A. Small, 1822. 2 p. I., [iii]^viii, [9]-415,
[1] p. 23h cm .
Treaties and treaty-making power, etc.: p. 53, 149, 328, 391,
395-400.
16-12958 JK1521.S4 1822
551 So, n<. 2d. ed. .with additions and improvements.
Philadelphia. P. II. Nicldin and T. Johnson, 1830. 2 p. I.,
xi,U0/>. 2}"\
35 23571 JK1521.S4 1830
TREATY-MAKING POWER IN THE UNITED STATES 115
552 Story, Joseph. Commentaries on the Constitution of the
United States : with a preliminary review of the constitu-
tional history of the colonies and states before the adop-
tion of the Constitution, 5th ed., by Melville M. Bigelow.
Boston, Little, Brown, and company, 1905, 1891. # v.
Treaties : v. 1, p. 13-15, 187-188, 193 ; v. 2, p. 225-226, 275-278,
450, 603-612.
8-27554 JK211.S72
553 Sutherland, George. Constitutional power and world affairs.
New York, Columbia university press, 1919. mi, W% p.
20 cm . {Columbia university lectures . . . George Blu-
menthal foundation, 1918)
The treaty -making power — General: p. 116-140; The treaty-
making power — How far limited: p. 141-165.
19^440 JK306.S7
554 Sutherland, William Angus. Notes on the Constitution of the
United States, showing the construction and operation of
the constitution as determined by the federal Supreme
court and containing references to illustrative cases from
the inferior federal courts and state courts.
San Francisco, Bancroft-Whitney company, 1904. %v, 973
p. 23¥ m .
Treaties : p. 239-240, 481-484, 517, 612-614.
4-21695 JK241.S96
555 Thayer, James Bradley. Cases on constitutional law. With
notes.
Cambridge [Mass.] C. ~W. Sever and company, 1895. # v.
%5\ cm .
Treaty-making power: p. 87-88. Great scope of the treaty-
making power : p. 373 n.
6-5685 JK241.T37
556 Thorpe, Francis Newton. The constitutional history of the
United States. 1765-1895.
Chicago, Callaghan & company, 1901. 3 v. maps. ^2\ cm .
Authority of a treaty : v. 2, p. 343.
Feb. 28, 1901-98 JK3 1 . T6
116 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
557 Tiffany, Joel. A treatise on government, and constitutional
law; being an inquiry into the source and limitation of
governmental authority, according to the American
theory.
Albany, W. 0. Little, 1867. vi p., 1 I,, [9]-398, \3]-179 p.
24 cm .
Defects of confederation in respect to treaties: p. 93; Power
to make treaties under the Constitution: p. 344; Subject
of treaties discussed: p. 344-34S ; Practice in making
treaties: p. 346-348.
9-2i<;::'.i JK241.T56
558 Tucker, Henry St. George. Limitations on the treaty-making
power under the Constitution of the United States.
Boston, Little, Brown, and company, 1915. xxi, 444 V-
%4\™.
15-8092 JK570.T8
559 Tucker, John Randolph. The Constitution of the United
States. A critical discussion of its genesis, development,
and interpretation. Ed. by Henry St. George Tucker.
Chicago, Callaghan & co., 1899. 2 v. ;l' f em .
Treaties, etc.: p. 37C>, 720-732, 822; Emphasis placed on the
limitations of the treaty-making power.
99-2353 JK241.T9
560 Tucker, St. George. View of the Constitution of the United
States.
(In Blackstone's commentaries . . . By St. George Tucker,
v. 1, p. 140-377. Philadelphia, 1803.)
Treaty-making power: p. 253, 264, 309, 332-336, 373.
561 Watson, David Kemper. The Constitution of the United
States, its history, application and construction.
Chicago, Callaghan & company, 1910. 2 v. 24\ cm .
Treaty making power: p. 2, p. 948-907.
10-19949 JK268.W3
562 Whiting-, William. War powers under the Constitution of the
United States. 43d ed.
Boston, Lee and Shepard; New )'<>rk. Lee, Shepard and
Dillingham, 1871. xxviii, 695 p. £3
Treaties modifying the law of nations: p. 340 352; How
aliens are affected by treaties of commerce: p. 352-354.
I) 23595 JK560.W7 1871
TREATY-MAKING POWER IN THE UNITED STATES 117
663 Willoughby, Westel Woodbury. The constitutional law of the
United States.
New York, Baker,Voorh'tsde company, 1910. 2 v. 2^ cm .
See chap. 34-35.
10-25891 JK268.W6
564 Wilson, James, and Thomas M'Kean. Commentaries on the
Constitution of the United States of America, with that
Constitution prefixed, in which are unfolded, the princi-
ples of free government, and the superior advantages of
republicanism demonstrated. The whole extracted from
debates, pub. in Philadelphia by T. Lloyd.
London, Printed for J. Dehrett, 1792. 1 p. I., [5]-147, [2]
p. 20\ cm .
Wilson on treaties: p. 96, 111-113.
9-21071 JK171.W7
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES
1778— FRANCE
565 Depew, Chauncey M. Our first treaty with France.
National review, May, 1912, v. 36: 150-156. AP4.N25,v.36
566 Lyman, Theodore. The diplomacy of the United States.
Being an account of the foreign relations of the country,
from the first treaty with France, in 1778, to the present
time. 2d ed. — with additions.
Boston, Wells and Lilly, 1828. 2 v. 2S cm .
Treaties of amity and commerce and of alliance of 1778, with
France : v. 1, p. 22-69, 352-353.
4-20773 JX1412.L9 1828
567 Raynal, Guillaume Thomas Frangois. The revolution of
America. New ed.
Edinburgh, 1783. vi p., 1 I., 191 p. 18 cm .
Appendices : no. 1. Treaty of friendship and commerce be-
tween the court of Versailles and the United States of
America, signed Feb. 6, 1778.
2-3699 E211.R27
568 Trescot, William Henry. The diplomatic history of the ad-
ministrations of Washington and Adams, 1789-1801.
Boston, Little, Brown and company, 1857. x, [2], 283 p.
21 cm .
Treaties with France declared void : p. 194.
7-3221 E312.T79
569 U. S. Congress. Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from
1789 to 1856. From Gales and Seatons' Annals of Con-
gress; from their Register of debates; and from the of-
ficial reported debates, by John C. Rives. By the author
of the Thirty years' view [Thomas Hart Benton].
Ni ir York [etc.] D. Appleton and company [etc."\ 1857-61.
16 v. 26 cm .
Abrogation uf French treaties: v. 2, p. 310-316.
15-87U1 J15.B4,v.2
118
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 119
570 U. S. 5th Congress. The debates and proceedings in the Con-
gress of the United States. May 15, 1797, to March 3,
1799, inclusive.
Washington: Gales and Seaton, 1851. 3 vols. 8°. {Annals
of Congress, vols. 7-9.)
Abrogation of French treaties, col. 586, 587, 588, 602, 2035,
2037, 2063, 2116, 2127, 2132, 3754.
Discussed and action taken in 1798. Among those who dis-
cussed the matter in the House were Sewall, Nicholas, Dana,
Otis, Bayard, Kittera, Gordon, S. Smith, Gallatin and
Edmond.
" An act to declare the treaties heretofore concluded with
France, no longer obligatory on the United States." Ap-
proved July 7, 1798, col. 3754.
571 5th Congress, 2d session. [Report by Mr. Goodhue from
the Committee on foreign relations, recommending the
abrogation of the French treaties.] June 21, 1798.
{In U. S. 56th Congress, 2d session. Senate doc. no. 231.
Compilation of reports of the Committee on foreign relations,
part 8, p. 10-11. Washington, 1901. 23 cm .)
JX234.A2.V.8
1790— CREEK INDIANS
572 B. [Communication on the treaty of 1790 with the Creeks.]
Daily National Intelligencer, Washington, Feb. 23, 1816,
page 2.
See Jefferson's Works, ed. by H. A. Washington, v. 6, p. 557-
560, for comment on this communication and a discussion of
Jefferson's views.
573 Jackson, Mrs. Helen Maria (Fiske) Hunt. A century of dis-
honor; a sketch of the United States government's deal-
ings with some of the Indian tribes; by Helen Jackson
(H. H.) New ed., enl. by the addition of the report of
the needs of the mission Indians of California.
Boston, Roberts brothers, 1885. as, 514 p. 19 cm .
2-15270 E93.J13
574 Jefferson, Thomas. The writings of Thomas Jefferson: . . .
With explanatory notes, tables of contents, and a copious
index to each volume, as well as a general index to the
whole, by the editor H. A. Washington. [Vols. 6 and 7]
Washington, D. C, Taylor & Maury, 1854. ® v. 23\ cm .
On the treaty with the Creeks, v. 6, p. 557-560 ; " Opinion
in regard to the continuance of the monopoly of the com-
120 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
meree of the Crock nation, enjoyed by Col. McGillivray,
July 120. 1790," v. 7, p. 504-506.
Jefferson afterwards qualified the statement made in this opin-
ion as to the treaty-making power. See note, p. 505; also
Washington's Jefferson, v. 4. p. 134-135, 407, 500; and Story
On the Constitution, 5th ed., v. 2, p. 609.
0-71 50 E302.J464,v.6,7
575 Jefferson, Thomas. The writings of Thomas Jefferson, col-
lected and ed. by Paul. Leicester Ford. [Vol. 5.]
Nt w York, G. P. Putnam's sons, 1895. sexviii, 515 p.
2B\ cm .
" Opinion in regard to the continuance of the monopoly of
the commerce of the Creek nation, enjoyed by Col. McGilli-
vray, July 29, 1790," p. 215-216. For later views on the
treaty-making power, scr note 1, p. 216; also, Ford's Jeffer-
son, v. 7. p. 07-0K ; Washington's Jefferson, v. 4, p. 134, 497,
500 ; and Story On the Constitution. 5th ed. v. 2, p. 609.
2-5666 E302.J466,v.5
576 Marshall, John. The life of George Washington . . . Com-
piled under the inspection of the honourable Bushrod
Washington, from original paper- bequeathed to him by
his deceased relative. 2d ed.. rev.
Philadelphia. James Crissy, 1832. 2 v. front. 22\ cm .
Treaty with the Creek Indians, allowing the free importation
of goods through the United States, v. 2, p. 192-193. and
note iv, v. 2, pt. 2, p. 4.
15-1321 E312.M35
577 Story, Joseph. Commentaries on the Constitution of the
United States: with a preliminary review of the constitu-
tional history of the colonies and states before the adop-
tion of the Constitution. 5th ed., by Melville M. Bigelow.
Boston. Little. Brown, and company, 1905, 1891. 2 v.
21f cm .
Note on the treaty with the Creek Indians, v. 2, p. 609.
8-27554 JK211.S72
578 IT. S. 1st Congress. The debates and proceedings in the Con-
gress of the United States. Vol. I. comprising (with vol.
II) the period from March 3, 1789, to March 3, 1791,
inclusive.
Washington: Gales and Seat on, 1834. 4°. {Annals of
Congress, v. 1.)
Bill providing for the expenses attending negotiations for
treaties with the Creeks, etc., considered in the House, col.
G98-703; Bill in the Senate, col. 62-64. Message from the
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 121
President of the United States, on the treaty with the
Creeks, eol. 1024-1025. Secret article relating to the free
importation of goods, col. 1025. Execution of secret article,
col. 1025.
579 Washington, George. The writings of George Washington;
. . . with a life of the author, notes, and illustrations.
By Jared Sparks. Volume XII.
Boston, John B. Russell, 1837. viii, 592, (1) p. 26 cm .
Message to the Senate; on a treaty with the Creek Indians,
August 4, 1790, p. 84-85. Message to the Senate; on a
treaty with the Creek Indians, August 7th, 1790, p. 86-87.
These messages are also printed in American State Papers,
Indian affairs, v. 1, p. 80, 81, (the treaty, p. 81-82) ; and
in the Journal of the executive proceedings of the Senate,
v. 1, p. 55-56, 58. (ratification of the treaty, p. 61-62.)
5-14201 E312.7.1834,v.l2
580 The writings of George Washington, collected and
edited by Worthington Chauncey Ford. Vol. 11, 1785-
1790.
New York and London: G. P. Putnam's sons, 1891. xxi,
(j), 510 p. m cm .
Treaty with the Creek Indians, p. 421-424, 495.
2-5665 E312.7.1889,v.ll
1794— GREAT BRITAIN (JAY TREATY)
581 Adams, John. The works of John Adams, second president of
the United States: with a life of the author; notes and
illustrations, by his grandson Charles Francis Adams.
Boston: Little, Brown and co. 1850-1856. 10 v. 22\ cm .
The treaty with Great Britain, negotiated by Mr. Jay, v. 1,
p. 471, 477, 4S1, v. 9, p. 18, 27, 36, 40, 74, 138.
8-19755 E302.A26
582 The American remembrancer; or, An impartial collection of
essays, resolves, speeches, &c. relative, or having affinity,
to the treaty with Great Britain.
Philadelphia, Printed by H. Tuchniss, for M. Carey,
1795-[96] 3 v., 21\™.
Together with the discussions of the expediency of the Jay
treaty are occasional observations on the constitutional
limitations on the treaty-making power. Included in the
collection are speeches and essays by Charles Pinckney,
Hamilton [Camillus], Mathew Carey [Caius]. R. R. Liv-
ingston [Cato], and others.
9-757 E311.A48
122 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
583 Ames, Fisher. The speech of Mr. Ames, in the House of repre-
sentatives of the United States, when in committee of the
whole, on Thursday, April 28, 1796, in support of the fol-
lowing motion : Resolved, That it is expedient to pass the
laws necessary to carry into effect the treaty lately con-
cluded between the United States and the king of Great
Britain.
Philadelphia, Printed by J. Fenno, 1796. 2 p. I., 59 p. 22\ cm .
6-7513 E314.A51
584 Same. [2 ed.]
Boston, Printed by J no. <('• J. N. Russell; sold by them; and
by William P. Blake [1796] 52 p. 23h cm .
16-25949 E314.A5
585 Same.
(In his Works. With a selection from his speeches and cor-
respondence. Ed. by his son, Seth Ames, v. 2, p. 37-71.
Boston 1S54. 24 cm .)
E302.A52,v.2
586 Same.
(In American oratory, p. 94-121. Philadelphia, 1836. 8°.)
587 Same.
(In Johnston, Alexander. British orations, [vol. 1] p. 112-130.
New York, 1896. 18£ cm .)
E173.J73,v.l
Also given in U. S. 4th Cong., 1st sess. House of Representa-
tives. Debates, part 2. Upon the subject of the British
treaty, p. 308-334. Philadelphia, 1796. 21£ cm .
JK573.1796.A5
588 Butler, Pierce. Letter to Madison. Philadelphia, June 12,
1795. Acnowledging a letter. Reading of the [British]
treaty in the Senate. Sends Madison a part of the docu-
ment to read and send to Jefferson and to not com-
municate it further. A few copies only printed. Its
constitutionality questioned. Its ratification problem-
atical. 3 p. 4°.
Ms. Department of State.
589 [Cobbett, William.] A little plain English, addressed to the
people of the United States, on the treaty negociated with
Lis Britannic Majesty, and on the conduct of the President
relative thereto; in answer to "The letters of Frank-
lin/' With a supplement, containing an account of the
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 123
turbulent and factious proceedings of the opposers of the
treaty. By Peter Porcupine [pseud.']
Philadelphia, printed: London, Reprinted : for F. and C.
Bimngton, 1795. 8, 111 p. 21\ cm .
8-8359 E311.F835
590 Same.
Philadelphia, T. Bradford, 1795. 8, 111 p. %2\™.
8-8361 E311.F834
591 The political censor, or monthly review of the most
interesting political occurrences, relative to the United
States of America. By Peter Porcupine [pseud.] [April
and May, 1796]
Philadelphia: Printed for Benjamin Da-vies, 1796. 2 nos.
22\ cm .
The April and May numbers contain reports of the debate in
the House of Representatives on the Jay treaty, and com-
ments by Cobbett. See p. 73-195.
E311.C66
592 Conway, Moncure Daniel. Omitted chapters of historj'- dis-
closed in the life and papers of Edmund Randolph, gov-
ernor of Virginia; first attorney-general United States,
secretary of state.
New York & London, G. P. Putnam'' s sons, 1888. vi, 401 p.
front, (port.) pi., tab. 24\ cm .
British treaty: p. 220-221, 227, 233, 246, 248, 253, 255, 260,
264, 292, 341, 354.
12-31573 E302.6.R18C7
593 [Dallas, Alexander James] Features of Mr. Jay's treaty.
(In Gt. Brit. Treaties, etc., 1760-1S20 (George III) Treaty
of amity, commerce, and navigation, between His Britannic
Majesty, and the United States of America. . . . Phila-
delphia, 1795. 21$ cm . p. 109-151)
10-227 E314.G781
594 [ ] Features of Mr. Jay's treaty. To which is annexed
a View of the commerce of the United States, as it stands
at present, and as it is fixed by Mr. Jay's treaty.
Philadelphia, Printed by Lang & U stick, for Mathew Carey,
1795. 51 p. 20\™.
[Bailey pamphlets, v. 9, no. 1]
[Duane pamphlets, v. 16, no. 4]
12-28262 AC901.D8 vol.16
124 LIBRARY OF COXGRESS
595 Dallas, Alexander James. Features of Mr. Jay's treaty. To
which is annexed a View of the commerce of the United
State-, as it stands at present, and as it is iixed by Mr.
Jay's treaty.
tin Life and writings of Alexander James Dallas, p. 160 210.
Philadelphia, 1871. 23i cm .)
"The British treaty and the constitution of the United States
are at war with each other," p. 183 et seq.
E302.D14D2
59G Elliot, Jonathan. The debates in the several state conventions,
on the adoption of the Federal Constitution, as recom-
mended by the general convention at Philadelphia in 1787.
Vol. 4. 2cl ed., with considerable additions.
Wash ington : Prin ted for the editor, 1836. xii, 639 p. .r n .
"Treaty-making power. — (Jay's treaty.)," p. 435-438. Dis-
cussions in the House of Representatives.
JK141.1836,v.4
597 Ellsworth, Oliver. Letter to Honorable Mr. Trumbull. Dated
Philadelphia, March 13, 1796. Grant of the treaty-mak-
ing power. Effect of treaties. Conflict of a treaty with
existing laws. etc. Treaty and statute-making power both
essential to regulate commerce with foreign nations and
the two powers are reconcilable. The claim of the House
of Representatives to participate in or control the treaty-
making power is as unwarranted as it is dangerous. The
obligation to appropriate money in the case of the pend-
ing treat} r is indispensable. 9 p.
Ms. Library of Congress. Letters to Washington. Vol. 117.
Miscellaneous.
598 Franklin, pseud. Letters of Franklin on the conduct of the
executive, and the treaty negociated, by the chief justice
of the United States, with the court of Great-Britain.
Philadelphia, Printed by E. Oswald, 1795. 56 p. m\ cm .
Originally published in the Independent gazetteer.
11-24291 E314.F83
599 Gallatin, Albert. On the British treaty — House of Repre-
sentatives, April 26, 1790.
(In Johnston, Alexander. American orations, [vol. 11 p. 84-
111. New York, 189G. 18J cm .) E173.J73.V.1
Also given in U. S. 4th Cong., 1st sess., House. Debates, pr. 2.
■» Upon the subject of the British treaty, p. 252-271. Phila-
delphia, 17!)G. 21} cm .
JK373.1796.A5
600 Same.
(In Moore. Frank. American eloquence, v. 2, p. 133-143.
New York, 1SG2. 2'^ m .)
E302.1.M82
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 125
601 Gallatin, Albert. [On the constitutional power of the House
with respect to treaties. March 7, 9, -21 and 31, 1796.]
(In U. S. 4th Cong., 1st sess. House. Debates, pt. 1. Upon
the constitutional powers of the House, with respect to
'treaties, p. 13-15, 44-55, 326-348, 367, Philadelphia, 1796.
2ir m .)
JK573.1796.A5
602 [Letter] to John Forsyth, Jan. 31, 1816.
(In The Writings of Albert Gallatin, ed. by Henry Adams,
v. 1, p. 684-6S7. Philadelphia, 1879. 25 cm .)
A review of treaties to which effect was given by legislative
act. Dwells especially on the Jay treaty.
E338.G16.V.1
603 Gibbs, George. Memoirs of the administrations of Washing-
ton and John Adams, ed. from the papers of Oliver Wol-
cott, secretary of the Treasury.
New York, Printed for the subscribers [W. Van Norden,
printer] 1846. 2 v. front, {port.) 23 rm .
The Jay treaty: v. 1, p. 307-319.
5-36490 E311.G44
601 Giles, William B. [On the constitutional power of the House
with respect to treaties. March 7, 11, and 31, 1796.]
(In U. S. 4th Cong., 1st sess. House. Debates, pt. 1. Upon
the constitutional powers of the House, with respect to
treaties, p. 6, 83-97, 364, 365, 369. Philadelphia, 1796.
2ir m .)
JK573.1796.A5
605 Gt. Brit. Treaties, etc., 1760-1820 {George III) Treaty of
amity, commerce, and navigation, between His Britan-
nick Majesty and the United States of America, signed at
London, the 19th of November, 1794. Published by
authority.
Quebec, Printed by command of the governor by W. Von-
denvelden, 1796. 45 p. 24\ cm . (In Gt. Brit. Laws,
statutes, etc. A collection of the acts . . . relative to
Canada. Quebec, 1800)
"Explanatory article"; p. [41]-45.
6-10401
606 Griswold, Roger. [On the constitutional powers of the House
with respect to treaties. March 10, 1796.]
(In U. S. 4th Cong., 1st sess. House. Debates, pt. 1. Upon
the constitutional powers of the House, with respect to
treaties, p. 56-63. Philadelphia, 1796. 21£ cm -)
JK573.1796.A5
126 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
GOT [Hamilton, Alexander] Defence of Mr. Jay's treaty.
(In The American remembrancer. Philadelphia. 1795-[96]
21 r m . v. 1. p. 47-9S, 174-199. 253-287; v. 2, p. 1S-34,
176-199; v. 3, p. 15-G3, 153-216, 238-275)
Caption title.
In 38 parts; signed: Camillas.
No. 1-22 pub. separately, New York. 1795, under title: A de-
fence of the treaty of amity, commerce, and navigation, en-
tered into between the United States of America & Great
Britain . . . 139 p. E314.H21
" Printed originally in the Minerva. The joint work of Ham-
ilton, King, and Jay." — P. L. Ford, Bibl. Hamiltoniana,
18S6, p. 47. On the same page may be found also a state-
ment of the part taken by each writer in the composition
of the work.
9-759 E311.A4S
G08 ■ The works of Alexander Hamilton, ed. by Henry Cabot
Lodge.
New York & London: G. P. Putnam's sons, 1885-86. 9 v.
£3i cm .
Defence of Mr. Jay's treaty. " Camillus," v. 4, p. 309-524, v. 5,
p. 3-332; Message from Washington to Congress, in reply to
a call for papers relating to the treaty with Great Britain,
v. 7. p. 11S-137 : Power of the House of Representatives in
case of a treaty discussed in letters to Washington, William
Smith, Rufus King, and Oliver Wolcott, v. S, p. 381-395.
9-4588 E302.H23
G09 Hunt, Charles Havens. Life of Edward Livingston.
A' w York, D. Appleton and company, 1864- xxiv, 4h% p.
incl. front, port. 23 cm .
Livingston on the treaty-making power: p. 68 et seq.
13-14393 E302.6.L78H92
610 Jefferson, Thomas. The writings of Thomas Jefferson, . . .
With explanatory notes. . . . by the ed. H. A. Washing-
ton. Vol. 4.
Washington, D. C, Taylor & Maury, 1854. vii, (7), 597
p. 23 \ rm .
Power of the House of Representatives in treaties discussed,
p. 124, 125, 134 139; Accuracy of the President's recollec-
tion challenged, p. 13G. See also p. 120-122, 126, 127, 131,
148, 465-46G; and v. 9, p. 1SG-187, lint 191.
( ' 7150 E302.J464,v.4
Gil The writings of Thomas Jefferson, collected and ed. by
Paid Leicester Ford. Vol. 7. 1795-1801.
Nt "' York. London, G. P. Putnam's sons, 1896. xxv, (1),
501 p. 23\ cm .
Power of the House of Representatives over treaties dis-
cussed, p. 40, 41, 59, 67-72; Abstract of arguments used by
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 127
John Marshall, p. 36-37 ; Accuracy of the President's recol-
lection challenged, p. 70. See also, p. 27-33, 38-42, 44, 58,
62 ; v. 1, p. 273-274, 277-278, and v. 8, p. 212.
2-5666 E302.J466,v.7
612 The Jeffersonian cyclopedia. A comprehensive collec-
tion of the views of Thomas Jefferson . . . Ed. by John
P. Foley.
New York and London, Funk & Wagnalls company, 1900.
xxii, (2) , 1009 p. plates, ports. %5\ cm .
" Jay treaty," p. 436-438.
0-4337 JK113.J4
613 King, Rufus. The life and correspondence of Rufus King,
comprising his letters, private and official, his public docu-
ments, and his speeches. Ed. by his grandson Charles
R. King.
New York, G. P. Putnam's sons, 1891^-1900. 6 v. 6 front,
(v. 1-5: ports.) 23\ cm .
See on Jay treaty in the House of Representatives: v. 2, p.
39-43.
C-246 E302.K54
614 Lee, Charles. Attorney-general to Washington. March 26,
1796. Expresses the opinion that the House of Repre-
sentatives has not the right, under the constitution, to de-
mand and obtain the papers on the Jay treaty described
in its resolution of March 24 without the consent of the
President. 6 p.
MS. Library of Congress. Letters to Washington, vol. 117.
Miscellaneous.
615 Attorney general to Washington. March 29, 1796. Has
examined the journals of the House of Representatives
and has not met with any act of Washington's adminis-
tration that contradicts the President's opinion relative to
the right of the House to participate in making trea-
ties. 1 p.
MS. Library of Congress. Letters to Washington. Vol. 117.
Miscellaneous.
616 Livingston, Edward. [On the constitutional power of the
House with respect to treaties, March 7, and 18, 1798.]
(In U. S. 5th Cong. 1st sess. House. Debates, pt. 1. Upon
the constitutional powers of the House, with respect to
treaties, p. 3, 4-5, 221-236. Philadelphia, 1796. 2L} cm .)
JK373.1796.A5
128 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
617 [Livingston, Robert R.] Observations on Mr. Jay's treaty.
(In The American remembrancer. Philadelphia, 1795-[96]
214 cm . v. 1. p. 114-122, 147-174, 219-252; v. 2, p. 3-13; v.
3, p. 63-07)
Caption title.
In 16 parts ; signed : < Jato.
Also pub. separately, Now York, 1795, under title: Examina-
tion of the treaty of amity, commerce, and navigation, be-
tween the rnited Stales and Croat Britain . . .
"The authorship of this pamphlet has been ascribed to Hamil-
ton, and to William Smith: but in a letter to James Monroe,
Mr. Livingston states that he has replied to Camillus 'over
my old signature — Cato.' "• — P. L. Ford, Bibl. Hamiltoniana,
1886, p. 47.
9-758 E311.A48
618 Lyman, Theodore. The diplomacy of the United States
Being an account of the foreign relations of the country,
from the first treaty with France, in 1778 to the present
time. 2d ed. — with additions.
Boston, Wells and Lilly, 1828. 2 v. 23 cm .
Treaty of 1794 with Great Britain, v. 1, p. 154-208.
4-2077? JX1412.L9 1828
610 McHenry, James. Secretary of war to Washington. March
26, 1796. The House has no right to make the call for
papers on the Jay treaty in the naked form it appears in.
To give or to hold the papers is a question of expediency.
Form of answer to the House suggested, setting forth
theory of treaty-making power. 9 p.
MS. Library of Congress. Letters to Washington. Vol. 117.
Miscellaneous.
620 McMaster, John Bach. A history of the people of the United
States, from the Revolution to the Civil War. Vol. II.
New Toil-: D. Appleton and coin pony, [1900? Copyright,
1885.'] (2),xx,0oG p. fold. map. 2?\ cm .
The British treaty of 1794, p. 189-307.
E301.M16,v.2
621 Madison, James. Letters and other writings . . . Vol. II.
1791-1815.
Philadelphia: •/. B. Lippincott d- co., 186-5. xxxvii, (1),
017 p. .'/"".
Letters to Jefferson, Dec. L3 and 27, 17a", Jan. 10 and 31,
Feb. 29, March 6 ami L3, April 4. 11. is and 23, May 1, 9,
ami 22, L796, )>. 63, 69-72, 75-76, 85 91, 94 95, 98-101,
103-104; Letters to .lam.-- Monroe, Dec. 20, 17 ( .C>. .Ian. 26,
Feb. J' - -. April 18, May II, p. c,| 67, 73, 82-83, 96-98, 101-
102; Letter to Edmund Pendleton, Feb. 7, L796, p. 77-78.
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 129
" There seem at present strong reasons to conclude that a
majority will be firm in the doctrine that the House has a
Constitutional right to refuse to pass laws for executing a
Treaty, and that the Treaty power is limited by the enumer-
ated powers." — Letter to Jefferson, March 13, 1796, p. 88.
Exception taken to the President's refusal to transmit the
papers relating to the Jay treaty, p. 89-90, 94.
6-24330 E302.M18,v.a
622 Madison, James. [On the constitutional powers of the House
with respect to treaties. March 7, 10, Apr. 6, 1796.]
(In U. S. 4th Cong., 1st sess. House. Debates, pt. 1. Upon
the constitutional powers of the House, with respect to
treaties, p. 15-16, 69-77, 375-385. Philadelphia, 1796.
2U cm .) JK573.1796.A5
623 Marshall, John. The life of George Washington . . . Com-
piled under the inspection of the honourable Bushrod
Washington, from original papers bequeathed to him
by his deceased relative. 2d ed., revised and corrected
by the author.
Philadelphia, James Crissy, 1832. 2 v. 22\ cm .
Debates in the House of Representatives on the Jay treaty
and the treaty -making power, v. 2, p. 377-3S5.
15-1321 E312.M35
624 Meier, Ernst, Uber den Abschluss von Staatsvertragen.
Leipzig, Duncker & Humblot, 1874-. xiii, 368 p. 23 cm .
Der Handelsvertrag mit England ; 1794 : p. 173-177.
2-18652 JX4171.T5M4
625 Muhlenberg-, Frederick Augustus. [Report on the treaty-
making power.]
(In Journal of the House of Representatives, [reprinted ed.]
4th Congress, 1st session, April 7, 1796, page 499. Wash-
ington, 1826. S°.)
626 Pickering 1 , Timothy. Secretary of State to the President.
March 29, 1796. Letter of transmittal to the President.
1 page. Accompanying papers as follows: Draught of
proposed answer to the House of Representatives, with
respect to its call for the papers relating to the negotia-
tions with Great Britain, and in discussion of the treaty-
making power. 9 p. Result of an examination of Mr.
Livingston's speech on calling for the papers on the Jay
treaty. 4 p.
Ms. Library of Congress. Letters to Washington. Vol. 117.
Miscellaneous.
137190°— 20 9
130 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
627 Pitkin, Timothy. A political and civil history of the United
Mates of America, from the year 1763 to the close of the
administration of President Washington, in March, 1797.
New Haven, II. Howe and Durrie d- Peck, 1828. 2 v.
front, {port.) 22\ cm .
The Jay treaty: v. 2, p. 442-478.
2 5355 E302.1.P682
628 Randolph, Edmund. The British treaty, 1795.
American historical n view, Apr. 1907, v. 12: 587-599.
Documents as follows: Randolph to the President, June 25,
L795; Memorandum of facts to be recorded, June 27, 1795;
Memorandum; Randolph to the President, July 12. 1895.
The Qrsl three documents are in the Library of Congress,
in Randolph's handwriting; the fourth is from a copy In
the Department of State, Transcripts, XXII, 184-201.
E171.A57,v.l2
629 [Opinion, as secretary of state, on the constitutionality
and expediency of empowering Mr. Jay to conclude a
treaty of commerce with Great Britain. Submitted May
6, 1794.]
(In Conway, Moncure D. Omitted chapters of history dis-
closed in the life and papers of Edmund Randolph, p. 220-
221. New York, 1888. 24A cm .) E302.6.R18C7
Holds that (1) "to permit such a treaty to be signed by Mr.
Jay. and transmitted Cor ratification, is to abridge the power
of the senate to judge of its merits;" (2) "if he be per-
mitted to sign a treaty of commerce, no form of expression
can be devised to be inserted in it which will not be tanta-
mount to a stipulation to ratify;" and (3), while the people
of the United States desire a treaty, " no man can under-
take to say that they would be contented with one or two
articles only" as proposed by the secretaries of the Treasury
and War Department.
This opinion is also printed in the Works of Alexander Hamil-
ton, ed. by J. C. Hamilton, v. 4, p. 549-550, New York, 1851.
The original ms. is in vol. 117. Letters to Washington.
Miscellaneous. Library of Congress.
630 [ 1 A vindication of Mr. Randolph's resignation.
Philadelphia, Printed by 8. II. Smith. 1795. 103 p. 21 rm .
The British treaty : p. H7-98.
9 8130 E311.R2
631 Rankin, Roberi Ream. The treaty of amity, commerce, and
navigation between Great Britain and the United States,
1794.
(In California. University. University of California chroni-
cle. Berkeley, 1907. 28 cm . vol. IX, no. 2 suppl. April,
L907. 100 p. Incl. map.)
Bibliography: p. 88 90.
14-9191 E314.B2
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 131
632 Schouler, James. History of the United States of America,
under the Constitution. Rev. ed. Vol. 1. 1783-1801.
New York, Dodd, Mead & company, \1891i\ xix, (1), 54-1
p. Folded map. 21\ cm .
E301.S372,v.l
The Jay treaty, p. 304-329.
633 Sedgwick, Theodore. On the constitutional powers of the
House with respect to treaties. [March 11 and 31, 1796.]
(In U. S. 4th Cong., 1st sess. House. Debates, pt. 1. Upon
the constitutional powers of the House, with respect to
treaties, p. 97-114, 364, 3G6. Philadelphia, 1796. 2U cm .)
JK573.1796.A5
634 Treaty of amity, commerce, and navigation, between His Bri-
tannic Majesty and the United States of America, con-
ditionally ratified by the Senate of the United States, at
Philadelphia, June 24, 1795. To which is annexed, a
copious index.
Philadelphia: Printed by Henry Tuckniss for Mathew
Carey, 1795. 283 p. 16°.
Same. 2d ed. Philadelphia: Printed by Lang & TJs-
tick, for Mathew Carey, 1795. 190 p. 8°.
Deals more with the expediency of the treaty than with
constitutional considerations.
635 Trescot, William Henry. The diplomatic history of the admin-
istrations of Washington and Adams, 1789-1801.
Boston, Little, Brown and company, 1857. x, [2], 283 p.
Negotiations and treaty with England : p. 63-128.
7_3221 E312.T79
636 TJ. S. Congress. Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from
1789 to 1856. . . . [Thomas Hart Benton]
New York, D. Appleton and company, 1857-61. 16 v.
£6 cm .
The treaty with Great Britain, v. 1, p. 639-702 ; Execution of
the treaty p. 702-754 ; Message of the president declining to
send papers, p. 692-693.
15-8704 J15.B4,v.l
637 4th Cong. 1st sess. The debates and proceedings in
the Congress of the United States. . . . Dec. 7,
1795 to June 1, 1796, inclusive.
Washington: Gales and Sea-ton, 1849. 26 cm . (Annals of
Congress, v. 5.)
Treaty with Great Britain, col. 426-783. See also col. 969,
976 etc., for the debate on carrying the treaty into effect.
J11.A5.V.5
132 LIBRAE Y OF CONGRESS
638 U. S. 4th Cong., 1st sess., 1795-1796. House. Debates in the
House of representatives of the United States, during
the first session of the Fourth Congress.
Philadelphia, Printed for B. F. Bache, by Bioren & Ma-
dan, 1796. 2 v. in 1. 21\<= m .
Contents. — pt. 1. Upon the constitutional powers of the
House, with respect to treaties. — pt. 2. Upon the subject
of the British treaty.
The debates were edited by Bache.
"The discussions . . . occupied the best parts of March
and April, 1796. They were divided Into two distinct de-
bates, each consuming about a month. The first began on
a preliminary resolution offered by Mr. Livingston, calling
on the president to lay before the House a copy of the in-
structions to Mr. Jay, together with the correspondence and
other documents relative to the treaty, excepting such as
any existing negotiation might render improper to be dis-
closed, and continued after that resolution had passed and
the President had refused to comply with it, upon further
resolutions brought forward by Mr. Blount of North Caro-
lina, protesting against the refusal. The second was upon
a resolution making the appropriation for carrying the treaty
into effect.
"These two debates brought out all the intellect and all the
eloquence of the House. ... A large number of ora-
tors, whose names oblivion has since overcome, vied in
wisdom, temper and eloquence with such men as James
Madison, William B. Giles, Theodore Sedgwick, and Fisher
Ames. The celebrated Bostonian delivered, on this occa-
sion, what is known as his greatest speech. . . .
"The members took sides at once, [after Mr. Livingston had
brought forward his resolution,] and spoke alternately, for
and against the resolution, from the 7th till the 24th of
March. Gallatin, Madison, and Giles were among the
earliest and most strenuous supporters of the resolution;
Sedgwick, and John Williams of New York, were conspicu-
ous in opposition to it." . . . — Hunt's Life of Edward
Livingston, p. 67-69.
9-26624 JK573.1796.A5
639 Washington, George. The writings of George Washington;
. . . With a life of the author, notes and illustrations.
By Jared Sparks. [Vols. XI and XII. "J
Boston: Russell, Shot tuck, and Williams, [etc.] 1836-1837.
£ v. £6 rm .
The British treaty, v. 11, p. 31, 32, 42, 13, 1 1, 46, IT. r,o, 57,
58, 71, 104, 481; v. 12, p. 58, 66, 211, 212, 213, 214; Papers
called for by the House of Representatives, v. 11, p. 115,
121, 122, 123; Message to the Bouse of Representatives,
March BOth, 1790, v. 12, p. L12-116.
&-14'_'<»l E312.7.1834,v.ll,12
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 133
640 Washington, George. Writings . . . collected and edited by
Worthington Chauncey Ford. Vol. 13. 1794-1798.
New York and London: G. P. Putnam's sons, 1892. xx,
501 p. 23¥ m .
Message to the House of Representatives refusing to send
the papers relating to the Jay treaty, p. 177-180. See
also, on the Jay treaty, p. 59, 153, 176, 188 and 208.
The message from Washington, refusing to send the papers
relating to the Jay treaty to the House of Representatives
is also printed in the Journal of the House of Representa-
tives, 4th Cong., 1st sess., p. 292-296; in American State
Papers, Foreign relations, v. 1, p. 550-551 ; Waites' State
Papers and Publiek Documents, v. 2, p. 102-105; and else-
where. See also Lodge's edition of Hamilton's Works, v. 7,
p. 118-137.
2-5665 E312.7.1889,v.l3
641 Williams, John. [On the constitutional powers of the House
with respect to treaties. March 21, and 31, 1796.]
(In U. S. 4th Cong., 1st sess. House. Debates, pt. 1. Upon
the constitutional powers of the House, with respect to
treaties, p. 236-246, 365-366. Philadelphia, 1796. 21* cm .)
JK373.1796.A5
642 [Wolcott, Oliver.] To the president. March 26, 1796. [On the
right of the House of Representatives to judge of a
treaty, etc.]
(In Gibbs, George. Memoirs of the administrations of Wash-
ington and John Adams, v. 1, p. 310-317. New York, 1S46.
23 cm .) E311.G44
1795— ALGIERS
643 Jefferson, Thomas. The writings of Thomas Jefferson: . . .
With explanatory notes, ... by the editor H. A. Wash-
ington. [Vols. 4 and 9]
Washington, Taylor & Maury, 1854- 2 v. 23\ cm .
The treaty with Algiers and the rights of the House, v. 4,
p. 136-139 ; v. 9, p. 106-107, 114-115.
6-7150 E302.J464,v.4,9
644 The writings of Thomas Jefferson, collected and edited
by Paul Leicester Ford. [Vols. 1 and 7.]
New York, London, G. P. Putnam's sons, 1892-1896. 2 v.
23\™\
The treaty with Algiers and the rights of the House, v. 1,
p. 183-184, 190-192; v. 7, p. 70-72.
2-5CG6 E302.J466,v.l,7
134 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
645 Lyman, Theodore. The diplomacy of the United States. Being
an account of the foreign relations of the country, from
the first treaty with France, in 1778, to the present time.
2d ed. — with additions.
Boston, Wells and Lilly, 1S28. 2 v. 2J'»>.
Algiers: v. 2, p. 352-380.
4-20773 JX1412.L9 1828
646 Trescot, "William Henry. The diplomatic history of the admin-
istrations of Washington and Adams, 1789-1801.
Boston, Little, Brown and company, 18-57. x, [2], 283 p.
21'"'.
Relations with Algiers: p. 208-274.
7-3221 E312.T79
647 U. S. 4th Cong., 2d sess., Senate. Algiers. Report from the
Committee to whom was referred the President's mes-
sage . . . relative to our affairs with the Dey and regency
of Algiers. Jan. 16, 1797.
(In American §tate papers. Foreign relations, v. 1, p. 538.
Washington, 1832.) J33
On the provision necessary to make the treaty with Algiers
effective, hi V. S. Annals of Cm tgross (dales & Seaton) v. 6,
col. 1670-1671,1763-1767,1787,2245-2246; Message from the
President, with accompanying papers on the situation of
affairs with the Dey and regency of Algiers, Jan. 9, 1707, v.
6, COl. 22:;.") 2245. Ads of appropriation, v. G, cols. 2S99. 2953.
The message from the President and the accompanying pa-
pers, referred to him, are also given in American state
papers. Foreign relations, v. 1, p. 553-558. J33
648 Wharton, Francis, ed. A digest of the international law of the
United States. 2d ed.
Washington: Government printing office, 1887. 3 v. 23\ cm .
Treaty with Algiers, v. 2, p. 79-80.
10-6949 JX237.W5 1887,v.2
1795— SPAIN
6-49 Lyman, Theodore. The diplomacy of the United States. Being
an accounl of the foreign relations of the country, from
Hie f i 1st treaty with France, in 177 s , to the present time.
2d ed. with addition-.
Boston. Wells and Lilly, 1828. : v. Z3 cm .
Treaty of 1795 with Spain: v. 1, p. 21m 282.
4-20773 JX1412.L9 1828
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 135
650 Madison, James. Letters and other writings. Published by
order of Congress. Vol. 2. 1794-1815.
Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott & co., 1865. xxxvii, {!),
617 p. 24 cm .
Constitutionality of the Spanish treaty, etc. p. 73, 82, 85,
86-87, 94.
6-24330 E302.M18,v.2
651 U. S. Ifth Cong. The debates and proceedings in the Congress
of the United States. [Comprising the period from De-
cember 7, 1795, to March 3, 1797, inclusive.]
Washington: Gales and Seaton, 1849. 2 v. 26 cm . {Annals
of Congress, v. 5, 6.)
Act for making the Spanish treaty effective, Annals, v. 5, cols.
73, 74, 80, S21, 940, 951, 976, 1025, 1094-1095, 1299; Docu-
ments, etc., relative to the treaty, v. 6, cols. 2524-2560 ; Copy
of the treaty, v. 6, cols. 2561-2568 ; Text of the act of appro-
priation, v. 6, col. 2899.
Jll.A5,v.5,6
652 4th Cong., 1st sess. The debates and proceedings in the
Congress of the United States. [Comprising the period
from December 7, 1795, to March 3, 1797, inclusive.]
Washington: Gales and Seaton, 1840. 2 v. 26 cm . {Annals
of Congress, v. 5,6.)
Appropriation to carry the treaty with Algiers into effect,
Annals, v. 5, cols. 80, 784-785, 940-969, 975-976, 1140; v. 6,
cols. 1570-1571.
Jll.A5,v.5,6
1803— FRANCE (TREATY OF PARIS)
653 Adams, Henry. History of the United States of America, dur-
ing the first administration of Thomas Jefferson.
New York, C. Scribner's sons, 1889. 2 v. double maps.
19 cm . [His History of the United States of America, v.
1-2]
The Louisiana treaty : v. 2, p. 25-115.
7-32890 E301.A21
654 Barbe-Marbois, Francois, marquis de. The history of Loui-
siana, particularly of the cession of that colony to the
United States of America; with an introductory essay
on the Constitution and government of the United States.-
Tr. from the French by an American citizen.
Philadelphia, Carey & Lea, 1830. xviii p., 1 I., [17~\~455,
[1] p. 22\ cm .
W. B. Lawrence, translator.
Constitutional considerations : p. 322-325.
" The President, with the advice and consent of the Senate,
concludes treaties which are declared by the constitution to
136 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
be the supreme law of the land ; but where an appropriation
of money is required, it is necessary to pass an act of Con-
press, in which the House of Representatives must of course
concur. In such cases, however, it has been supposed that
the national faith is pledged to enact the laws proper to
carry the treaties Into effect." — Translator's note, p. 825.
1-8732 F369.B24
655 Cession of Louisiana. The various legislative acts to complete
the cession of Louisiana occasioned debates in which the
treaty making power was discussed. A resolution was in-
troduced in the House of Representatives, Jan. 4, 1803,
asking for " copies of such oflicial documents as have been
received by this Government," and was discussed by John
Randolph, Roger Griswold, Calvin Goddard, Samuel W.
Dana, Benjamin Huger.
(In U. S. Annals of Congress (Gales & Seaton), v. 12, col. 312,
314-324, 325-338, 352-368.)
Jll.A5,v.l2
656 A resolution was introduced in the House of Repre-
sentatives, Oct. 24, 1803. asking for " a copy of the treaty
between the French Republic and Spain.*' with copies of
such other documents, (ending to ascertain whether, the
United State- have acquired any title to the province of
Louisiana. This was discussed by Roger Griswold, John
Randolph. Calvin Goddard, John Smilie, Joseph H.
Nicholson, & Samuel L. Mitchell.
{In U. S. Annals of Congress, (Gales & Seaton), v. 13 col.
385 11!'.)
Jll.A5,v.l3
657 The bill for carrying into effect the treaty by appro-
priation of thirteen millions was discussed in the House.
Oct. 1803, by John Randolph. Roger Griswold, Samuel D.
Purviance, James Elliot, Samuel Thatcher. Caesar A.
Rodney. Samuel L. .Mitchell, and Joseph H. Nicholson.
(/» U. s. Annuls of Congress, (Gales & Seaton), v. 13, col.
432 189, 497 515, 545 549.)
Jll.A5,v.l3
658 The bill passed by the House, Oct. 26, 1803, appropri-
ating $13,000,000 for the purpose of carrying into effect
the Louisiana treaty, was discussed in the Senate. Nov.
1803, by Samuel White, William Hill Wells. George
Jackson, Roberl Wright. Timothy Pickering. Jonathan
Dayton, .John Taylor, Uriah Tracy, John Breckenridge,
AYilsou Carey Nicholas, and William Cocke.
(/// I'. S. Annals of Congress, (Gales >S: Seaton), v. 13, col.
35 74.)
Jll.A5,v.l3
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 137
659 Cooley, Thomas Mclntyre. The acquisition of Louisiana.
Indianapolis, The Bow en-Merrill company, 1887. [63]-93
p. 24\ cm . {Indiana historical society. Publications, vol.
ii, no 3)
'An address delivered before the Indiana historical society,
February 16, 1887. Originally issued as no. 3 of the Indi-
ana historical society pamphlets.
5-5635 F521.I41
660 Edwards, P. L. Congress and the Constitution. Precedent of
the Louisiana purchase.
Albany law journal, Apr. 1902, v. 64 : 112-124.
661 Elliot, Jonathan. The debates in the several state conventions,
on the adoption of the Federal Constitution, as recom-
mended by the general convention at Philadelphia, in
1787. Vol. 4, 2d ed., with considerable additions.
Washington: Printed for the editor, 1836. xii, 639p. 24 cm .
" Louisiana treaty," p. 448-451. Discussions in the House
of Representatives.
JK141 1836,v.4
662 Jefferson, Thomas. The writings of Thomas Jefferson: . . .
With explanatory notes, ... by the ed. H. A. Washington.
[V. 4, 8.]
Washington, Taylor & Maury, 1854,. % v - 23\ cm .
Constitutionality of the acquisition of Louisiana, discussed
in letters to Breckinridge, Madison, Lincoln, and Nicholas,
v. 4, p. 498-507. Appended to the letter to Madison (Aug.
25, 1803) is a proposed amendment to the Constitution for
the acquisition of Louisiana and Florida. Cession of
Louisiana discussed in Jefferson's third annual message,
v. 8, p. 24.
6-7150 E302.J464,v.4.8
663 The writings of Thomas Jefferson collected and ed. by
Paul Leicester Ford. Vol. 8, 1801-1806.
New York, London, G. P. Putnam's sons, 1897. xxiv, 501).
p. 23\ cm .
Letter to John Dickinson, Aug. 9, 1803, touching on the con-
stitutional difficulties in the way of the acquisition of
Louisiana, p. 261-263. Acquisition discussed in Jefferson's
third annual message, p. 268-269.
2-5666 E302.J466,v.8
664 [Letter] to Gallatin. Aug. 23, 1803.
(In The writings of Albert Gallatin, ed. by Henry Adams, v.
1, p. 144-145. Philadelphia, 1879. 25 cm .)
Gives proposed amendments to the Constitution for the ac-
quisition of Louisiana and Florida.
E338.G16,v.l
138 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
665 Lyman, Theodore. The diplomacy of the United States. Be-
ing an account of the foreign relations of the country
from the first treaty with France, in 1778, to the present
time. 2d ed. with additions.
Boston: Writs and Lilly, 1828. 2 v. 23™.
Cession of Louisiana, v. 1, p. 367— 405 ; Claim under eighth
article of treaty of Louisiana, v. 2, p. 177-190.
JK1412.L9 1828
666 McMaster, John Bach. A history of the people of the United
States, from the Revolution to the Civil War. Vol. III.
New York: D. Appleton and company, 1802. (2), xvii,
{l),584p. 22V m .
Jefferson's proposals to amend the Constitution regarding
Louisiana, p. 1-3 ; Debate on right to call for treaty papers,
p. 3-6; Arguments by Griswold against the constitutionality
of the treaty with France, p. 6-8 ; Pickering's "partner-
ship" theory, p. 8-9; Constitutional principles settled, p. 9.
E301.M16,v.3
667 Meier, Ernst. Uber den Abschluss von Staatsvertragen.
L< ipzig, Duncher & Humblot, 187 J+. xiii, 368 p. 23 cm .
Der Vertrag mit Frankreich iiber die Abtretung von Louisiana
von 30 April 1803: p. 178.
2-18652 JX4171.T5M4
668 Miller, Samuel Freeman. Lectures on the Constitution of the
United States.
New York and Albany: Banks and brothers, 1893. xxi,
765 p. 2//'\
"The acquisition of Louisiana," p. 128-132.
2-19694 JK241.M66
669 Nicholas, W. C. Letter to Jefferson. Warren, Sept. 3, 1803.
On the power of the Government to acquire territory and
admit new states. 4 p. 4°.
Ms. Department of State. Series 2, v. 63, no. 47.
670 Schouler, James. History of the United States of America,
under the Constitution. Rev. ed. Vol. 2. 1801-1817.
New York, Dodd, Mead & company, [1894] xvii, (1),
627 p. 21\ rm .
"The Louisiana purchase," p. 49-59.
E301.S372,v.2
671 Sparks, Jared. The life of Gouverneur Morris, with selections
from his correspondence and miscellaneous papers . . .
Boston: Gray <(■ Bowen, 1832. 3 v. 23 cm .
Morris on the acquisition of Louisiana, v. 3, p. 183, 185, 203.
E302.6.M7S7
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 139
672 Story, Joseph. Commentaries on the Constitution of the
United States — with a preliminary review of the consti-
tutional history of the colonies and states before the
adoption of the Constitution. 5th ed., by Melville M.
Bigelow.
Boston, Little, Brown, and company, 1005, 1801. 2 v.
Purchase of Louisiana, v. 1, p. 17, 386 ; v. 2, p. 172-175,
199-200.
S-27554 JK211.S72
673 U. S. Congress. Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from
1789 to 1856 . . . [Thomas Hart Benton]
New York, D. Appleton and company, 1857-61. 16v. 26 cm .
Louisiana treaty in the Senate : v. 3, p. 9-20 ; in the House :
p. 52-57, Gl-72.
15-8701 J15.B4,v.3
674 8th Cong. The debates and proceedings in the Congress
of the United States. October 17, 1803, to March 3, 1805,
inclusive.
Washington: Gales and Seaton, 1852. 26 cm . (Annals of
Congress, v. 13.)
The Louisiana treaty, in the Senate, cols. 31-73, 105-106, 213;
In the House, cols. 3S2-420, 432-189, 497-515, 545-550. Con-
stitutional principles involved are considered in the general
range of the discussion.
Jll.A5,v.l3
675 8th Cong., 1st sess. Message, transmitting conventions
with France for the cession of Louisiana, and the liquida-
tion of certain claims of American citizens ; together with
documents connected therewith. Oct. 21, 1803.
(In American state papers. Foreign relations, v. 2, p. 506-583.
Washington, 1832. F°.) j33
676 Dept of state. State papers and correspondence bearing
upon the purchase of the territory of Louisiana.
Washington, Govt, print, off., 1003. 200 p. 23 cm . {57th
Cong., 2d sess. House. Doc. no. 431)
3-15294 E333.U55
677 Treaties, etc., 1801-1800 (Jefferson) . Message from the.
President of the United States, inclosing a treaty and con-
ventions, entered into and ratified by the United States of
America and the French republic, relative to the cession of
Louisana. 22d October, 1803. Read and referred to a
committee of the whole House on Monday next.
{Washington, 1803.] 18 p. 22 cm ,
11-27276 E333.U563
140 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
G78 TJ. S. Treaties, etc., 1801-1809 {Jefferson). Treaty and con-
ventions, entered into and ratified by the United States
of America and the French republic relative to the cession
of Louisiana.
[Washington? 1803] 16 p. 21i/ m .
5-4559 E333.U56
679 Webster, Sidney. Two treaties of Paris and the Supreme
court.
New York and London, Harper & brother, 1901. 2 p. L, 132,
[1] p. 19y»\
1-26558 JV568.1901.W4
1815— GREAT BRITAIN
G80 Calhoun, John C. Speech on the bill to regulate the commerce
between the United States and Great Britain, according
t<» the convention of the 3d of July, 1815; delivered in the
House of Representatives, January 9th, 1816.
(In Ms Works, v. 2, p. 123-135. New York, 1856. 23 cm .)
E337.8.C136,v.2
An argument as to the limits of the treaty-making power.
"Whatever, then, concerns our foreign relations; whatever
requires the consent of another nation, belongs to the treaty-
making power, and can only he regulated by it: and it is
competent to regulate all such subjects, provided [and here
are its true limits] such regulations are not inconsistent
with the constitution. IT so, they arc void. No treaty can
alter the fabric of our government, nor can it do that
which the constitution has expressly forbidden to be done;
nor can it do that differently which is directed to be done
in a given mode— all other modes being prohibited." ... p.
132-1:;::.
681 Elliot, Jonathan. The debates in the several state conventions,
on the adoption of the Federal Constitution, as recom-
mended by the general convention at Philadelphia, in
1787. Vol. 4, 2d ed.. with considerable additions.
Washington: Printed for the editor, 1836. xii, 639 p. 21f m .
" On the commercial treaty with Great Britain," p. 462^167.
Discussions in the House of Representatives.
JK141 1836,v.4
682 Lyman, Theodore. The diplomacy of the United States.
Being an account of the foreign relations of the country
from the first treaty with France, in 1778, to the present
time. 2d ed. with additions.
Boston: Wells and Lilly, 1828. 2 v. 23 cm .
Commercial convention of 1815 with Great Britain, v. 2, p.
59 7.1.
4-20773 JX1412.L9 1828
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 141
683. Meier, Ernst. Uber den Abschluss von Staatsvertragen.
" Leipzig, Duncker & Humblot, 1871 xiii, 368 p. 23™.
See p. 179-180.
2-18652 JX4171.T5M4
684 Pinkney, William. Speech ... on the treaty-making power,
delivered in the House of Representatives of the United
States, January 10, 1816.
(In American oratory, p. 303-319. Philadelphia, 1836. 8°.)
685 Same.
(In Wheaton Henry. Some account of the life, writings, and
speeches of William Pinkney, p. 517-549. New York, 1826.
2U cm .)
On the British convention of 1815.
E302.P65
686 Same.
(In Pinkney, William. The life of William Pinkney, by his
nephew, p. 337-361. New York, 1853. 23i cm .)
1 E302.6.P6P6
687 U. S. Congress. Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from
1789 to 1856. By [Thomas Hart Benton]
New York D. Appleton and company, 1857-61. 16 v. 26™.
Commerce with Great Britain.
Treaty-making power: v. 5, p. 446-460, 492-546.
15-8704 J15.B4,v.3
688 nth Cong., 1st sess. The debates and proceedings in
the Congress of the United States . . . Dec. 4, 1815, to
April 30, 1816, inclusive.
Washington: Gales & Seaton, 1851 26™. (Annals of
Congress, v. 29.) JU.A5,v.29
Bill concerning the convention to regulate the commerce be-
tween the territories of the United States and His Bri-
tannic Majesty, reported in the Senate, cols. 36-37; passed,
col 40; in House, col. 546; Laid on the table, col. 608;
Twice read and referred to a committee of the whole, cols.
719-7^0 • Passed by the House with amendments, col. 898;
Returned to Senate from House, with amendments, and re-
ferred col. 126 ; Senate disagrees to amendments, cols. 130-
131 • Conference asked and agreed upon, cols. 134, 136, 960,
979- Reports of Senate managers, cols. 160-161; Report
of House managers, cols. 1018-1023; House recedes, cols.
1057-1058. House bill to regulate commerce, twice read,
cols 419-420 ; Discussed by House and laid on the table, col.
471 • Ordered to a third reading, col. 545 ; Read a third time
and' passed, col. 674; in Senate, cols. 43, 44, 45, 46-89; Fails
of a third reading, col. 89; Message to House, col. <19.
142 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Message from the President transmitting proclamation,
cols. 29. 402. Copy of the British convention, together with
papers and documents, cols. 1477-1506. Discussion of
treaty-making power, etc., in Senate, by Mr. James Barbour,
cols. 46-57; by Fromentin, cols. 57-65; by Mr. Roberts, cols.
65-74; by Mr. Macon, cols. 74-79; by Mr. Campbell, cols.
79-S9. Discussions in the Bouse, by Mr. Forsyth, cols.
473-47S, 593-594, 605, 652-671; by Mr. Philip P. Barbour,
cols. 47S-482; by Mr. Gold, coVs. 482-485, 594; by Mr. Bop-
kinson, cols. 485-489, 639-651; by Mr. Gaston, cols. 489-
492; by Mr. Throop, cols. 492 494; by Mr. Gholson, cols.
522-525; by Mr. Calhoun, cols. 526 533, cor.; by Mr. Ran-
dolph, cols. 533-538, 579-59(1. 591 ; by Mr. King, cols. 538-
539; by Mr. Mills, cols. 539-542; by Mr. Reynolds, cols. 542-
543; by Mr. Hardin, cols. 513-545; by Mr. Easton, cols. 540-
554; by Mr. Cuthbert, cols. 554-557; by Mr. Tucker, cols.
557-564; by Mr. Pinkney, cols. 504-579. 590-591; by Mr.
Pickering, cols. 594-595, 612-010; by Mr. Root, col. 595; by
Mr. Robertson, cols. 595-599; by Mr. Wright, cols. 599-G04;
by Mr. Lowndes, cols. 004-605; by Mr. Hanson, cols. 005-
608; by Mr. Stanford, cols. 008-011; by Mr. Taylor, cols.
610-023 ; by Mr. Wilde, cols. 023-631 ; by Mr. Sheffey, cols.
631-639; by Mr. Buger, cols. 072-074; by Mr. Lyon, cols.
884-897.
689 U. S. l.'fth Cong., 1st sess. Report from the conferees of the
Senate, upon the bill entitled " An act concerning the con-
vention to regulate the commerce between the territories
of the United States and his Britannic majesty. Febru-
ary 27, 1816. 3 p. 8°. (14th Cong., 1st sess. Ex. doc.
no. 54.)
" Tbe conferees of the Senate did not contest, but admitted
tbe doctrine, that of treaties made in pursuance of the
Constitution, some may not, and that others may call for
legislative provisions to secure their execution, which pro-
vision Congress, in all such cases, is bound to make. But
they did contend that the convention under consideration
requires no such legislative provisions, because it does no
more than suspend the alien disability of British subjects
in commercial affairs, in return for the like suspension in
favour of American citizens; that such matter of alien
disability falls within the peculiar province of the treaty-
power to adjust; that it cannot be securely adjusted in any
other way, and that a treaty duly made, and adjusting
the same, is conclusive, and by its own authority suspends
or removes antecedent laws that are contrary to its pro-
visions." Report presented by Rufus King.
690 Report of the committee appointed on the part
of the House of Representatives to confer with the com-
mittee on the part of the Senate, on the disagreeing votes
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 143
of the two Houses, upon the bill, concerning the conven-
tion to regulate the commerce between the Territories of
the United States, and his Britannic majesty. February
19, 1816. 9 p. 8°. (14th Cong., 1st sess. Ex. doc. no.
52.)
"They are persuaded, that the House of Representatives
does not assert, the pretension that no treaty can be made
without their assent; nor do they contend that in all cases
legislative aid is indispensably necessary, either to give
validity to a treaty, or to carry it into execution. On the
contrary, they are believed to admit, that to some, nay
many treaties, no legislative sanction is required, no legis-
lative aid is necessary. ..." For if, as has been stated,
the House of Representatives contend that their aid is
only in some cases necessary, and if the Senate admit
that in some cases it is necessary, the inference is irresist-
ible, that the only question in each case that presents itself,
is whether it be one of the cases in which legislative pro-
vision is requisite for preserving the national faith, or not."
Report presented by John Forsyth.
1817— GREAT BRITAIN
691 Boutell, Henry Sherman. Is the Rush-Bagot convention im-
mortal ?
North American review, /Sept. 1901, v. 173: 331-348.
AP2.N7,v.l73
692 [Naval armament upon the Great Lakes. Remarks in
the House of Representatives, Jan. 24, 1901]
(In Congressional record, 56th Cong., 2d sess., v. 34, pt. 2,
Jan. 24, 1901, p. 1392-1408.)
Jll.R5,v.34,pt.2
Pp. 1393-140S contain Senate ex. doc. no. 9, 52d Cong., 2d sess.
Serial no. 3055
693 Callahan, James Morton. The neutrality of the American
lakes and Anglo-American relations.
Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins press, 1898. 199 p. 24 cm .
(Johns Hopkins university studies in historical and po-
litical science . . . series xvi, no. 1-4)
Agreement of 1817: p. 59-90. H31.J6
1-10120 JX1423.C3
694 The northern lake frontier during the civil war.
(I)i American historical association. Annual report for the
year 1896, v. 1, p. 335-359. Washington, 1897. 8°.)
Substantially reproduced in the author's work, " The neu-
trality of the American lakes and Anglo-American rela-
tions," 1898.
E172.A60 1896, v.l
144 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
G95 [Foster, John Watson] Limitation of armament on the Great
Lakes.
Washington^ D. C, The Endowment, 1911+. 1 p. I., vii, 57
p. %lf,\ cm . {Carnegie endowment for international peace.
Division of international law. Pamphlet no. 2)
" Report of the Honorable John W. Foster, secretary of state,
in response to Senate resolution of April 11, 1892, relative
to the agreement [April 28-29, 1817] between the United
States ;ind Great Britain concerning the naval forces to be
maintained on the Great Lakes."
"Transmitted to the Senate, Dec. 7, 1892, by President Har-
rison, and printed in Sen. Ex. doc, no. 9, 52d Cong., 2d sess."
14-20283 JX1906.A3 no.2
JX1423.F7
696 Hunt, Harry E. Attacking the Rush-Bagot treaty.
Independent, Apr. 28, 1910, v. 68: 911-913.
AP2.I53,v.68
697 Levermore, Charles Herbert. The Anglo-American agree-
ment of 1817 for disarmament on the Great Lakes.
Boston, World peace foundation, 1914-. 28 p. 20\ cm .
(World peace foundation. Pamphlet series . . . vol. iv,
no. Jf)
14-177 17 JX1908.U5 vol.4,no.4
698 Mann, James R. [Naval armament upon the Great Lakes.
Remarks in the House of Representatives, Jan. 24, 1901.]
(In Congressional record, 5Gth Cong., 2d sess., v. 34, pt. 2,
p. 1392.)
Jll.R5,v.34,pt.2
699 Scammell, E. H. The Rush-Bagot agreement of 1817.
Ontario historical society. Papers, 1915, v. 13: 58-66.
F1056.058,v.l3
700 Smith, William Alden. [Naval armament upon the Great
Lakes. Remarks in the House of Representatives. Jan.
24, 1901.1
(In Congressional record, 5Gth Cong. 2d sess. v. 34, pt. 2, p.
1391-1392.)
Jll.R5,v.34,pt.2
701 Sumner, Charles. Termination of treaties by notice. Remarks
in the Senate, on a joint resolution to terminate the treaty
of L81T regulating the naval force on the Lakes, January
18, I B65.
(In his Works, vol. 9. p. 201-205, Boston, 1874. 8°)
E415.6.S93,v.9
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 145
702 U. S. 15th Cong., 1st sess. Great Britain — Naval armament on
the lakes. Communicated to the Senate, April 6, 1818.
[Message from President Monroe, with accompanying
papers.]
(In American state papers. Foreign relations, v. 4, p. 202-
207. Washington. 1834. F°.)
Comprises, besides the President's message, the correspondence
between the United States and Great Britain with respect to
the naval armament of the two governments on the lakes.
and the stipulations agreed upon by the two parties.
J33
703 38th Cong., 1st sess. The Congressional Globe.
Washington: Congressional Globe office, 1864. 4 V^ 8 ' b°-
House joint resolution no. 91 " in relation to the treaty of
1817," introduced in House, p. 2909, and passed by that
body, p. 3084 ; Received in the Senate, p. 3086, and referred
to the committee on foreign relations, p. 3088.
Subject of naval force on the lakes discussed in connection
with the proposed abrogation of the Canadian reciprocity
treaty, pp. 2481-2483.
704 38th Cong., 2d sess. The Congressional Globe.
Washington: The Congressional Globe office, 1865. 2 pts.
Senate resolution calling for information on the arrangement
relating to the naval force on the lakes, p. 44 ; House joint
resolution no. 91 reported in the Senate, with amendment,
p. 292 ; Discussed by Messrs. Davis, Sumner, Johnson, Wil-
son, Saulsbury, Farwell, p. 311-315; Passed, p. 315; Re-
ceived in House, from Senate, p. 337 ; Referred to com-
mittee on foreign affairs, p. 348 ; House concurs in Senate
amendment, p. 596; Resolution signed by the President,
p. 688. The text of the resolution is given in United States
Statutes at Large, v. 13, p. 568.
705 Deft, of state. Message from the President of the United
States, communicating, in answer to a resolution of the
Senate of the 15th of December, 1864, a report from the
secretary of state, relative to an arrangement between the
United States and Great Britain, relating to the naval force
to be maintained upon the American lakes. Jan. 9, 1865.
[Washington, 1865.] 1 p. 23 cm . (38th Cong., 2d sess.
Senate. Ex. doc. no. 6.) Serial no. 1209
Makes reference to American State Papers, Foreign rela-
tions, v. 4, p. 202-207.
137190°— 20 10
146 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
TOG U. S. Dept. of .state. Me— age from the President of the
United States, in response to Senate resolution of April
11, 1892, relative to the agreement between t he United
States and Great Britain concerning the naval forces to
be maintained on the great lakes. Dec. 7, 1892.
{Washington, 1892]. 59 p. 23 cm . (52d Cong., 2d sess.
Senate. Ex. doc. no. 9.) Serial no. 3055
Known as Adee's report.
A report by the Secretary of State, John W. Foster, on the
Senate resolution "that the Secretary of State be, and he is
hereby, directed to inform the Senate whether the agree-
ment entered into between the United States and Great
Britain in the year eighteen hundred and seventeen, cov-
ering the question of the naval force to be maintained by
the two governments on the Great Lakes of the United
Slates, is now held to be in force by the Department of
Siate, and what, if any. action has been taken by our Gov-
ernment to revive or put in force the terms of said agree-
ment, and if so, under what authority or action on the
part of our Government such agreement has been held to be
in force since the giving of the required formal notice by
the President to Great Britain in December, eighteen hun-
dred and sixty-four, of a desire on the part of the United
Stales to annul said agreement at the expiration of the
six months from* the date of said formal notice, and the
ratification of said notice by the act of Congress of Feb-
ruary ninth, eighteen hundred and sixty-five."
Gives a history of the agreement of 1S17 from the outset, and
of the circumstances which prompted the steps in 1865 to
terminate it and afterwards to withdraw the notice of
termination. Papers and correspondence on the subject are
appended, including the note of Mr. Seward, dated Aug. 5,
1864, in reply to Lord Lyons, on the motion in Congress to
abrogate the arrangement of 1817.
707 Papers relating to foreign affairs. [1864. pt. 2;
1865, pts. 1 and 2.]
Washington: Government printing office, 1865-1866. 3 v.
23 cm .
Also appear as House ex. doc. no. 1, pt. 2. 3Sth Cong., 2d
sess., Eouse ex. doc. no. 1, pts. 1, 2, 39th Cong., 1st sess.
Correspondence relating to armed vessels on the great lakes.
1864, pt. 2, p. 329, 338, 340, 343, 344, 595, 668, 715, 716, 717,
729, 739; L865, pt. 1, p. 5, 164, 184, L97; L865, pt. 2, p. 17. IS,
43, 174, 175, 192, 195, 196. Arrangement of 1817 remains in
In force, 1S65, pt. 2. p. 192.
For note Of Mr. Seward, dated Aug. 5, 1864, iii reply to Lord
Lyons, on the motion in Congress to abrogate the arrange-
ment of 1817, see Senate ex. doc. no. 9, 52d Cong., 2d sess.,
p. 43.
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 147
708 U. S. Navy deft. War steamers — Northwestern lakes. Let-
ter from the secretary of the navy, transmitting the in-
formation required by the resolution of the 12th instant,
in relation to the construction of steamers or other ves-
sels for the defence of the northwestern lakes. April 20,
1842.
[Washington, 18J$.] 2 p. 23 cm . (27th Cong., 2d sess.
House Ex. doc. no. 199.) Serial no. 404
Reports that communications of value, though not entirely
conclusive, have been received on the construction of
steamers on the northwestern lakes, under the appropriation
of Sept. 9, 1841.
709 President. Message of the President of the United
States at the commencement of the first session, of the fif-
teenth congress. Communicated to Congress, December
2, 1817.
(In American state papers. Foreign relations, v. 4, p. 129-
132. Washington, 1834. F°.)
Notes, among other things, the conclusion of the arrange-
ment for the reduction of the naval forces on the lakes, and
gives provisions of the arrangement.
J33
710 Message from the President of the United
States, in compliance with a resolution of the Senate in
relation to the military and naval preparations of the
British authorities on the northern frontier of the United
States. June 29, 1840.
[Washington, 1840.~] 4. p. 23 cm . (26th Cong., 1st sess.
/Senate Doc. no. 592.) Serial no 361
See also House ex. doc. no. 245, 26th Cong., 1st sess.
Serial no 369
711 British naval armament on the lakes. Message
from the President of the United States, transmitting
the information required by the resolution of the House
of Eepresentatives of the 9th instant, relative to the
present British naval armament on the lakes, &c, &c.
March 28, 1840.
[Washington, 1840.] 4 p. 23 cm . (26th Cong., 1st sess.
House Ex. doc. no. 245.) Serial no. 366
The resolution of the House requested the President to com-
municate to that body " if compatible with the public
service, whether the Government of Great Britain had ex-
pressed to the Government of the United States a desire to
annul the arrangement entered into between the two Gov-
148 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
erninents, in the month of April, 1S17, respecting the naval
force to be maintained upon the American lakes; and, if
said arrangement he not annulled, whether there has been
any violation of the same by the authorities of Great
Britain."
712 IT. S. President. Military preparation — Northeastern frontier.
Message from the President of the United States, trans-
mitting the information required by the resolution of the
House of Representatives of the United States of the 6th
of April last, respecting the military preparation of
Great Britain on the northern and northeastern frontier
of the United States, &c. June 29, 1840.
[Washington, 1840.] 4 V- ^ rm - {%6th Cong., 1st sess.
House Ex. doc. no. 2.'/j.) Serial no. 369
Also notes the naval armaments on the Great Lakes. (See
Senate doc. no. 592, 2Gth Cong., 1st sess.)
713 Naval force on the lakes. Message from the
President of the United States, in reply to the resolution
of the House of Representatives of the 9th of March last,
respecting the arrangement entered into with the govern-
ment of Great Britain upon the subject of the naval force
to be maintained upon the American lakes. &c. June
29, 1840.
[ Washington, 18J t 0.~\ 3 p. %B cm . (26th Cong., 1st sess.
IIun.se Ex. doc. no. 2^6.) Serial no. 369
Contains the report of the major general commanding the
army, giving the replies of several officers who had been
written to on the subject.
714 Message to the two houses of Congress at the
commencement of the second session of the thirty-eighth
Congress. Dec. 6, 1861.
(/» C. S. 38th Cong., 2d sess. House. Ex. doc. no. 1, pt. 1,
>'• i" 14 -) Serial no. 1216
. . . " it has been thoughl proper to give notice that after the
expiration of six months, the period conditionally stipulated
in the existing arrangement with Great Britain, the United
States must hold themselves .-it liberty to increase their
naval armament upon the lakes, If they shall find th;it pro-
( eeding necessary," p. 5.
715 Waultrin, Rene. fitats-Unis d'Amcrique el Grande Bretagne —
Le traite Rush Bagot, (1817), concernant le nombre des
batiments armes a entretenir sur les Grands-Lacs, et son
application.
Ri >■'!' generah d< droit inU mational public, Sept.-Oct.
J.''//, v. 18:683 586, jx3.R56,v.is
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 149
71G Wehberg, Hans. Les traites sur la limitation des armements.
Revue politique Internationale, no. 29, October, 1917.
Section I. — Grande Bretagne et Etats-Unis; Traite de Rush-
Bagot, 28 avril 1S27.
717 Wild, Robert. The Rush-Bagot convention.
(In State bar association of Wisconsin. Report, 1915. Mil-
waukee, 1916. 23§ on '. p. 100-111.)
1818— GREAT BRITAIN
718 Anderson, Chandler P. The final outcome of the fisheries ar-
bitration.
American journal of international law, Jan. 1913, v. 7:
1-16. JX1.A6.V.7
719 Hodgins, Thomas. The prerogative right of revoking treaty
privileges to alien subjects.
Canadian law times, Feb. 1909, v. 29: 105-129.
720 Same. 2d ed.
Toronto, The Carswell company, limited [etc.] 1909. 27 p.
inch map. 22\ cm .
" From the Nineteenth century and after."
12-18177 JX238.N69 1909
Reviewed by Amos S. Hershey in American journal of inter-
national law, v. 4, 1910: 770.
721 McGrath, P. T. The Atlantic fisheries dispute.
American review of reviews, June, 1910, v. 41 •' 718-724.
AP2.R4,v.41
722 The Newfoundland fishery dispute.
North American review, Dec. 7, 1906, v. 183: 1134-1143.
AP2.N7,v.l83
723 Morine, Alfred B. Newfoundland and her fishing rights.
Canada law journal, Dec, 1906, v. 42: 737-741.
On the dispute between Newfoundland, England and the
United States as to fisheries under the treaty of 1818. Shows
that Newfoundland places a narrow interpretation on the
words of the treaty and holds that " the colonial government
should maintain the spirit of Imperial promises even at great
sacrifice."
724 The Newfoundland fisheries' dispute.
Canadian law review, Nov. 1906, v. 5: 414~4^-
150 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
725 U. S. Congress. Senate. Committee on foreign relations.
Mr. Edmunds, . . . Report (executive no. 3) on the treaty
(Ex. M.) between the United States and Great Britain,
concerning the interpretation of the convention of Octo-
ber 20, 1818, signed at Washington, February 15, 1888;
which together with the view of the minority on the same
subject, submitted by Mr. Morgan, was ordered to be
printed in confidence for the use of the Senate. May 7,
1888.
[Washington. 1SS8.] 165 p. 23 cm . (50th Cong. 1st sess.
/Senate. Misc. doc. no. 109.) Serial no. 2517
Incorporated is a protest (page 36) against the claim " that
the Senate, without whose advice and consent no treaty can
be concluded, has no right to be informed, confidentially, of
the course of negotiations and discussions and the various
propositions and arguments pro and con arising in the
negotiation of a treaty." The minority discuss the objection
(page 39) that the treaty of February 15, 1S88 was "nego-
tiated and signed by persons who were not duly empowered,
under the Constitution and laws of the United States, to
conduct and conclude a treaty," and with reference to the
fact that two of the plenipotentiaries concerned had acted
without a confirmation by the Senate, give, on pp. 110-134,
" a statement of the persons employed by the United States,
in conducting negotiations, since 1789," of whom " the whole
number of persons appointed or recognized by the Presi-
dent, without the concurrence or advice of the Senate or
the express authority of Congress, as agents to conduct nego-
tiations and conclude treaties is four hundred and thirty-
eight," (page 103)
1819— SPAIN
726 Clay, Henry. On the Spanish treaty. In the House of Repre-
sentatives, April 3, 1820.
(In his Speeches, ed. by Calvin Colton, v. 1, p. 205-217. New
York, 1857.)
" Has the House of Representatives a right to express its
opinion upon the arrangement made In that treaty?" p. 211
et seq.
727 Onis, Luis de. Memoir upon the negotiations between Spain
and the United States of America, which led to the treaty
of 1819. With a statistical notice of that country. Ac-
companied with an appendix, containing important docu-
ments for the better illustration of the subject. Tr. from
the Spanish, with notes, by Tobias Watkins.
Baltimore, V . Lucas, jimr., 1821. 152 p. 20\ cm .
11-27007 F314.0585
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 151
728 Onis, Luis de. Memoria sobre las negociaciones entre Espana y
los Estados-Unidos de America, que dieron motivo al
tratado de 1819. Con una noticia sobre la estadistica de
aquel pais. Acompana un Apendice, que contiene docu-
mentos importantes para mayor ilustracion del asunto.
Madrid, Impr. de D. M. de Burgos, 1820. 2 v. fold. map.
%7 cm .
9-25896 F314.058
1826— DENMARK
729 [Gushing, Caleb.] Claim of the U. States on Denmark.
Boston monthly magazine, Jan., 1826, v. 1: p. 393-403.
AP2.B81,v.l
730 [McDermott, Hugh Farrar] Letters on the Sound-dues-ques-
tion, i-vii.
New York, G. B. Teubner, printer, 1855. vi, 73, [i] p.
22\ cm .
Signed: "Pax."
9-349S0 HE386.S7M2
731 Schuyler, Eugene. American diplomacy and the furtherance
of commerce.
New York, C. Scribner's sons, 1886. xiv, 469 p. 21\™.
The Sound dues: p. 306-316.
10-16533 JX1407.S3
732 Sumner, Charles. The abrogation of treaties. Speeches in the
Senate, March 6 and May 8, 1856.
(In his Works, v. 4, p. 98-120. Boston, 1871. 20i cm .)
E415.6.S93,v.4
■ Same.
(In Charles Sumner, His complete works, Statesman ed. v. 5,
p. 98-120. Boston, 1900. 23 cm .) E415.6.S95,v.5
On the abrogation of the Danish convention of April 26, 1826.
Maintains that the power of abrogation belongs to the law-
making power and is to be exercised only by act of Congress.
733 TJ. S. 34th Cong. 1st and 2d sess. The Congressional Globe.
[vol. 32.]
Washington: Printed at the office of John G. Rives, 1856.
3 pts. 4°-
Resolution in the Senate relating to the sufficiency of the
notice for the termination of the treaty with Denmark, of
April 26, 1826, concerning the Danish Sound dues, p. 528,
599, 826, 1003, 1132, 1173, 1202, 1203, 1700. Remarks were
made by Messrs. Bayard, Benjamin, Brodhead, Cass, Clay-
ton, Collamer, Crittenden, Fessenden, Foot, fllile, Johnson,
Jones of Iowa, Mallory, Mason, Seward, Stuart, Sumner,
Toombs, Toucey, Wade, and Weller.
152 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
734 TJ. S. Congress. Senate. Committee on foreign relations.
[Report . . . on the Senate resolution, ''Resolved, That the
Committee on Foreign Relations be directed to consider
the expediency of sonic act of legislation, having the con-
currence of both houses of Congress, by which the treaty
with Denmark, regulating the payment of Sound dues,
may be effectively abrogated, in conformity with the re-
quirements of the Constitution, under which every treaty
is a part of 'the supreme law of the land,' and in con-
formity with the practice of the government in such cases;
ami especially to consider whether there be any defect in
the notice which has been given, which such legislation
may be necessary to remedy."] April 7, 185G.
Senate. Report no. 97.) Serial no. 836
"And whether it be competent, or not, to the President and
Senate, as the treaty making power to abrogate treaties
where no such right is reserved, (a question not neces-
sary to be brought into discussion here.) the committee en-
tertain no doubt that where the right to terminate a treaty
at discretion is reserved in the treaty itself, such discretion
resides in the President and Senate," p. 4.
The committee recommended the adoption of the following
resolution: "Resolved, That the notice which has been given
by the President to Denmark, pursuant to the resolution of
the Senate of March 3, 1855, to terminate the treaty with
that power of the 26th of April, in the year 1826, is suf-
ficient to cause such treaty to terminate and be annulled to
all intents whatsoever, pursuant to the eleventh article
thereof; and that no other or further act of legislation is
necessary, to put an end to said treaty, as part of the law
of the land," p. 8.
735 Dept. of state. Sound dues upon American commerce
to the Baltic. Message from the President of the United
States, transmitting correspondence in relation to the
imposition of " Sound dues " upon our commerce to the
Baltic. June 13, 1854.
[Washington, 185b.~] 61 p. 23 cm . {33d Cong., 1st sess.
Home. Ex. dor. Il0 . 108.) Serial no. 726
736 Message of the President of the United States, trans-
mitting a copy <>f a convention between the United State-,
and His Majesty the king of Denmark for the discon-
tinuance of the Sound due-. Jan. 14. 1858.
[Washington, 1858.] 3 p. 28™, {30th Cong., 1st sess.
Si note. Ex. doc. no. 28.) Serial no. 924
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 153
737 U. S. Dept. of state. Sound dues. Letter from the Secretary
of state enclosing letters calling attention to the necessity
of an appropriation to meet the interest on the sum stipu-
lated to be paid to Denmark for the discontinuance of
the Sound dues. Jan. 21, 1858.
[Washington, 1858.] 2 p. 23 em . {35th Cong., 1st sess.
House. Ex. doc. no. 36.) Serial no. 955
738 Webster, Daniel. Sound dues at Elsinore, and the German Zoll-
Verein. Mr. Webster to the President of the United States.
May 24, 1841.
(In his Works, v. 6, p. 406-414. Boston, 1854. 22i cm .)
E337.8.W24 1854,v.6
. Same.
(In his Writings and speeches. National ed., v. 12, p. 80-88.
Boston, 1903. 25 cm .) E337.8.W24 1903,v.l2
Briefly states the history and facts relating to the sound dues
at Elsinore in order that, if it be deemed expedient,
" instructions may be given to the representative of the United
States at Denmark, to enter into friendly negotiations with
that government, with a view of securing to the commerce
of the United States a full participation."
1831— FRANCE
739 The Annual register, or a view of the history, politics, and
literature, of the year 1834.
London, Printed for Baldwin and Cradock, 1835. viii,
4?1, (1),400, Up. %3"\
Bill for satisfying the claims of the United States against
France rejected by the Chamber of Deputies, pt. 1, p. 357-
361. D2.A7 1834
740 Everett, Edward. Eemarks on the French question, in the
House of representatives ... on the 7th of February and
2d of March, 1835. With the reports of the majority and
minority of the Committee of foreign affairs, on the same
subject.
Boston, Nathan Hale, 1835. 31 p. 24 cm .
10-16829 JX238.F75 1835g
741 Meier, Ernst, Uber den Abschluss von Staatsvertragen.
Leipzig, Duncher & Humblot, 1874. viii, 368 p. 23 cm .
See p. 179-180.
2-18652 JX4171.T5M4
154 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
742 Treaties in the House.
Nation, Dec. 18, 188b, v. 39: 516-517. AP2.N2,v.39
Includes citation from a letter by Wheaton on the French
treaty.
743 U. S. Congress. Report of the commissioners under the act
to carry into effect the late treaty with France, with a
statement of the claims examined by them. June 7, 1834.
[Washington, 183 If.'] 91 p. 23 cm . 23d Gong., 1st sess.
Senate. Doc. Jfl7.) Serial no. 242
744 23d Cong., 2d sess. Register of debates in Congress.
Vol. II.
Washington: Gales and Seaton, 1835. 2 pts. 4°.
Relations with France discussed in the Senate, cols. 45, 104-
108.
Discussed in the House, cols. 763-778, 795-796, 1129, 1515-1524,
1531-1565, 1570-1634, Remarks by Mr. Clayton, cols. 764-769,
775-776, 1595-1599 ; Mr. Claiborne, cols. 769-771 ; Mr. Wayne,
cols. 772-774; Mr. Archer, cols. 774-775, 1537-1545; Mr. R.
M. Johnson, cols. 776-777; Mr. J. Q. Adams, cols. 1532-1537,
1622-1630; Mr. Pickens, cols. 1545-1554; Mr. Bouldin, cols.
1554-1558 ; Mr. Cambreleng, cols. 1531-1532, 1558-1561 ; Mr.
Burses, cols. 1561-1562; Mr. Coulter, cols. 1562-1565; Mr.
E. Everett, cols. 1571-1577; Mr. Allen, cols. 1577-1590; Mr.
Love, col. 1590; Mr. Moore, cols. 1590-1594; Mr. Sutherland,
cols. 1594-1595 ; Mr. Robertson, cols, 1600-1606 ; Mr. Binney,
cols. 1606-1615 ; Mr. Schley, cols. 1615-1617 ; Mr. Watmough,
cols. 1618-1619; Mr. Beardsley, cols. 1620-1621; Mr. Hardin,
cols. 1030-1631; Mr. Chilton, cols. 1631-1632.
The resolutions adopted by the House (see cols. 1633-1634)
read as follows :
" Resolved, That, in the opinion of this House, the treaty of
the 4th of July, 1831, should be maintained, and its execu-
tion insisted on.
"Resolved, That the Committee on Foreign Affairs be dis-
charged from the further consideration of so much of the
President's message as relates to commercial restrictions,
or to reprisals on the commerce of France.
" Resolved, That preparation ought to me made to meet any
emergency growing out of our relations with France."
Papers, documents and correspondence on relations with
France are given in the Appendix, (in pt. 2) p. 2-5, 108-
144, 104-109, 177-185, 208-219, 271-277.
715 Congress. House. Committee on foreign affairs. Re-
lations with France. Report [from] the Committee on
foreign affairs, to which was referred so much of the
President's message as concerns our political relations
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 155
with France, and the correspondence between the minis-
ters of the two governments. Feb. 27, 1835.
[Washington, 1835.'] 21 p. 23 cm . {23d Gong., 2d sess.
House Reft. no. 133.) Serial no. 276
Includes resolutions submitted to the House by the majority
of the Committee, views of the minority of the committee,
and resolutions offered by Mr. Adams as follows:
1. "Resolved, That the rights of the citizens of the United
States to indemnity from the Government of France, stipu-
lated by the treaty concluded at Paris on the 4th of July,
1831, ought, in no event, to be sacrificed, abandoned, or im-
paired, by any consent or acquiescence of the Government of
the United States.
2. " Resolved, That if it be, in the opinion of the President of
the United States, compatible with the honor and interest
of the United States, during the interval, until the next ses-
sion of Congress, to resume the negotiations between the
United States and France, he be requested so to do.
3. "Resolved, That no legislative measure of a hostile char-
acter or tendency towards the French nation is necessary or
expedient at this time."
746 Senate. Committee on foreign relations. Report [by
Mr. Clay] from the committee on foreign relations, March
3, 1835.
[Washington, 1835."] 4 p. 23 cm . (23d Cong., 2d sess. Sen-
ate. DOC. no. 150.) Serial no. 269
On the President's message of Feb. 25, 1835.
747 Dept. of state. Relations with France. Message from
the President of the United States, transmitting copies
of letters received from Mr. Livingston since the date of
his message of the 6th instant, with his instructions and
correspondence with the French government. Feb. 25,
1835.
[Washington, 1835.] U p. 23™. (23d Cong., 2d sess.
House Ex. doc. no. 174.) Serial no. 274
Also printed as Senate doc. no. 145, 23d Cong., 2d sess.
Serial no. 269
743 Message from the President of the United States,
in compliance with a resolution of the Senate, transmitting
certain documents relating to the state of affairs with
France. Feb. 15, 1836.
[Washington, 1836.] 89 p. 23 cm . (2kth Cong., 1st sess.
Senate. Doc. no. 161.) Serial no - 289
Discussion in the Chamber of Peers respecting the convention
of 1831, p. 4-26.
1 5G LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
749 IT. S. Dept of state. Relations with France, and duties on
silk- and wines. Message from the President of the
United States, transmitting reports from the secretary of
state, secretary of the treasury; the former relating to the
relations with France, and the latter to duties on wines
and silks imported since 4th July. 1831. Feb. 18, 1836.
[Washington, 1836.] 121 p. 23™. {24th Cong., 1st sess.
H0US( Ex. doc. 110. 117.) Serial no. 289
750 President. Message from the President of the United
States, to the two houses of Congress, at the commence-
ment of the second session of the twenty-third Congress.
Dec. 2, 1834.
[ Washington, 1834.] 543 p. Fold, diagr. 23 cm . (23d
Cong., 2d sess. House Ex. doc. no. 2.) serial no. 286
Affairs with France, p. 6-12.
Appended (p. 39.3-543) is a translation from the Paris Mom-
mar, by order of the Secretary of State of the United States,
of the " Proceedings and discussions in the French Chamher
of Deputies, on the subject of the treaty between France
and the United States, which was signed at Paris <>n the
4th of July. 1831, and the ratifications of which were ex-
changed at Washington on the 2d of February, 1832; from
the first presentation of the treaty, on the 6th of April, 1833,
to the refusal to carry it into effect on the 2d of April, 1834."
751 French treaty. Message from the President
of the United States, in relation to the late treaty with
France. Feb. G. 1835.
[Washington, 1835.] 5 p. 23 cm . (23d Cong., 2d sess.
House Ex. doc. no. 136.) Serial no. 274
752 Wharton, Francis. A digest of the international law of the
the United States. 2d ed.
Washington: Govt, print, off ., 1887 . 3 v. 23\ cm .
Refusal of the French Chamber to make the appropriations,
v. 1, p. 36, v. 3, p. 88-97. JX237.W5 1887
1832— RUSSIA
753 American Jewish year book. The passport question in Con-
gas: reprint from the American Jewish year book 5670.
[Philadelphia, Tin Jewish publication society of America,
1909?] cover-title, p. [21]-43. 19™.
14-10834 JX4253.E8A6
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 157
754 American Jewish year book. The passport question; reprint
from the American Jewish year book 5672.
New York, The American Jewish committee, 101 1, cover-
title,- a, no p. i9 cm .
16-24683 JX4253.R8A63
755 Egert, B. P. The conflict between the United States and
Russia.
8t. Petersburg, 1012. 50 p. %l cm .
14-17900 JX1428.R8E45
756 Henriques, H. S. Q. The Russian passport system; religious
disabilities of foreigners.
Law magazine and review, May, 1014, v. SO: 320-326.
757 L'incident russo-americain relatif aux passeports des Juifs
russes emigres et naturalises aux Etats-Unis.
Journal clu droit international prive, 1012, v. 39: 150-168.
JX6002.J5,v.39
758 Kuhn, Arthur Kline. International law and the discrimina-
tions practiced by Russia under the Treaty of 1832.
[Washington, D. C, Press of B. S. Adams, 1911] 10 p.
23 cm .
" Prepared by request for the Board of delegates on civil
rights of the Union of American Hebrew congregations and
the Independent order of B'nai B'rith."
12-0996 JX1428.R8K8
759 Marshall, Louis. Russia and the American passport. Address
... to the delegates at the twenty-second council Union
of American Hebrew congregations, Thursday, January
10, 1911, together with resolution unanimously adopted.
[New York, 1011] 16 p. 23h_ cm .
Issued also as U. S. Senate doc. 839, 61st Cong., 3d sess.
11-5507 JX4253.R8M2
760 The passport question between the United States and Russia.
American journal of international law, Jan. 1012, v. 6:
186-191. JXl.A6,v.6
On abrogating the Treaty of 1832.
761 Sulzer, William. The Russian passport question. Speech in
the House of representath'es, December 13, 1911.
[Washington, Govt, print, off., 1911] 8 p. 24- cm .
ca 12-855 JX4253.R8S8
158 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
702 U. S. Congress. House. Committee on foreign affairs. The
abrogation of the Russian treaty. Report
[Washington, Govt, print, off., 1911] U p. 23$ cm . (62d
Cong., 2d sess. House. Rept. 179)
Submitted by Mr. Sulzer.
Referred to the House calendar and ordered printed Dec. 12,
1911.
Joint resolution 166 provides for the termination of the treaty
of 1832 between the United States and Russia on the ground
that Russia has continually violated the provisions of the
treaty by refusing to recognize passports granted to Ameri-
can citizens, on account of race or religion.
11-35948 JX4253.TJ6A5 1911
763 Termination of treaty between the United
States and Russia.
[Washington, Govt, print, off., 1911] 34 p. 23 cm .
Hearing of Feb. 16, 1911, on House joint resolution no. 284,
providing for the termination of the treaty concluded at St.
Petersburg, Dec. 18, 1832, on the ground that Russia has
violated the treaty by imposing restrictions on American
citizens of Jewish faith in Russia. D. J. Foster, chair-
man of committee.
JX234.A5 1911
[Washington, Govt, print off., 1911] 64 p. 23 cm .
Hearings of Feb. 16 and Feb. 22, 1911.
11-35164 JX234.A5 1911a
7G4 Termination of the treaty of 1832 between
the United States and Russia. Hearing before the Com-
mittee on foreign affairs of the House of representatives,
Monday, December 11, 1911.
Washington, Govt, print off., 1911. 303 p. 23h cm .
lion William Sulzer, chairman.
Statements of William G. McAdoo, Mayer Sulzberger, Louis
Marshall, Oscar S. Straus, etc.
JX1428.R8A5 1911
Washington, Govt, print off., 1911. 336 p. 23\ cm .
"Appendix tv. The passport question in Congress, 1879-1909":
p. 304-320.
12-3455-0 JX1428.R8A5 1911a
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 159
765 TJ. S. Congress. Senate. Committee on foreign relations.
Treaty of 1832 with Russia. Hearing before the Com-
mittee on foreign relations, United States Senate, Sixty-
second Congress on S. J. res. GO . . . December 13, 1911.
Washington, Govt, print, of., 1911. 50 p. 23 cm .
Shelby M. Cullom, chairman.
Statements of Louis Marshall, Mayer Sulzberger, and Oscar S.
Straus, on a joint resolution providing for the termination
of the treaty . . . concluded at St. Petersburg Dec. 18, 1832.
Appendix (p. 43-50) consists of translations, as follows: Con-
sular treaty between the German Empire and Russia of
Dec. 8 (Nov. 28) 1874. — Treaty . . . between Austria-Hungary
and Russia, of Feb. 2 (15) 1906. — Treaty . . . between France
and Russia of March 20 (April 1) 1874, with modifications
by the commercial convention of Sept. 16 (29) 1905. — Trans-
lation and summary of a debate in the French chamber of
deputies, Dec. 27, 1909.
12-25038 JX1428.R8A5 1911b
766 President, 1909-1913 (Taft) Treaty of 1832 between
the United States and Russia. Message from the Presi-
dent of the United States, transmitting copy of a notice
forwarded by the secretary of state to the American am-
bassador at St. Petersburg relative to the termination
of the treaty of 1832 between the United States and
Russia.
[Washington, Govt, print, off., 1911] 2 p. 21(. cm . (62d
Cong., 2d sess. Senate. Doc. 161)
11-35992 JX1428.R8A5 1911a
1844— GERMANIC STATES
767 Calhoun, John C. [Letter to Henry Wheaton. June 28, 1844.]
(In Wheaton, Henry. Elements of international law, 6th ed.,
p. cvi-cviii, Boston, 1855. 23 cm .)
Calhoun expresses regret at " the omission of the Senate to
act finally on the treaty with the Zollverein States."
JX2495.E3 1855
768 Fisk, George Mygatt. Die handelspolitischen und sonstigen
volkerrechtlichen Beziehungen zwischen Deutschland und
den Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika. Eine historisch-
statistische Studie.
Stuttgart, J. G. Cottd'sche Buchhandlung nachf., 1897. xiv,
254 p- 22\ cm . (Miinchener volkswirtschaftliche Studien,
hrsg. von L. Brentano und W. Lots. 20. stuck)
Die Versuche Wheatons, einen Vertrag mit dem Zollverein zu
vereinbaren, p. 81-91.
G-1030 HF3099.F53
160 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
769 K., T. L. Germany, and the commercial treaty of Berlin.
Hunt's merchants' 1 magazine, Dec. 1844, v - 11 i 491-SOi.
HFl.M5,v.ll
770 Lawrence, William Beach. Introductory remarks.
(In Wheaton, Henry. Elements of international law. Gth ed.
p. xii-exciv. Boston, 1855. :2.T m .)
P. xciii-cx outline Wheaton's negotiations with the Zollverein
and include a letter of June 28, 1844, from J. C. Calhoun
expressing regret at "the omission of the Senate to act
finally on the treaty with the Zollverein States."
JK2495.E3 1855
771 Meier, Ernst. Uber den Abschluss von Staatsvertragen.
Leipzig: Duncher & Humblot, 1874. sciii, 368 p. 23 cm .
See p. 180-181.
2-18652 JX4171.T5M4
772 U. S. Congress. Senate. Committee on foreign relations.
[Report by] Mr. Choate, ... on the 1st instant, the con-
vent ion with Prussia and the other states of the Germanic
association of customs and commerce. June 14, 1844.
(In Journal of the executive proceedings of the Senate, v. 6,
p. 3:53-336. Washington, 1887. 23 cm .) Serial no. 430
On the treaty negotiated by Mr. Wheaton. Holds that the
Senate is constitutionally incompetent to ratify the treaty,
and also that the treaty sets forth an unequal value of
stipulated equivalents.
773 [Report by] Mr. Archer, ... a message
relating to the convention with Prussia, and other states
of the Germanic association of Customs and commerce,
and to whom was referred, on the 23d December, the said
convention. Feb. 26, 1845.
(In Journal of the executive proceedings of the Senate, v. 6,
p. 406-411). Washington, 1887. 23 cm .) Serial no. 448
A reaffirmation of the views expressed in the report pre-
sented by Mr. Choate the year before.
771 — Tn asury dept. Report from the secretary of the treas-
ury [R. J. Walker] on the state of the finances. Dec. 3,
1845.
[ Washington, 184*5.] 957 p. 23™. (29th Cong., 1st sess.
Senate. Doc. no. 8.) Serial no. 471
Also appears as House doc. no. 6. 29th Cong., 1st sess.
Serial no. 481
Report of R. J. Walker. Argues (p. 12) that opposition to the
Zoll-Verein treaty Is on the part of the manufacturing
interest.
CONSIDERATIONS IN EESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 161
775 "Wheaton, Henry. [Letter to John C. Calhoun ; Berlin, Dec. 24,
1845.]
(In American historical association. Annual report 1899.
Vol. II. Calhoun correspondence, p. 10G3-1065. Wash-
t ington, 1900. 23 cm .)
On the treaty negotiated with the Zollverein, which the Sen-
ate in 1S44, failed to ratify.
E172.A60 1899,v.2
776 [Wurm, C. F.] Die Ratifikation von Staatsvertragen.
Deutsche Vierteljahrs Schrift, 1845, v. 8, 1 Heft, p. 163-239.
AP30.D45,v.8
Vereinigte Staaten von Nordamerika and Preussen (fiir den
deutschen Zollverein) 1844, p. 225-233.
777 Zimm.erm.ann, Alfred. Geschichte der preussisch-deutschen
Handelspolitik.
Oldenburg und Leipzig, Schulze, 1892. v p. 1 I., 850 p.
24 cm .
Negotiations of Mr. Wheaton: p. 294-296; Text of the Con-
vention of 1844: p. 599-606.
l-G-1529 HF1545.Z7
1844— TEXAS
778 Benton, Thomas Hart. Speech of Mr. Benton, of Missouri, de-
livered in the Senate of the United States, May 16, 18,
and 20, 1844, in secret session on the treaty for the an-
nexation of Texas.
"Washington, J. and G. S. Gideon, printers, 1844- 28 p.
22\ cm .
10-1547 F390.B49
779 Same.
Congressional globe, 28th Cong. 1st sess. Appendix, p.
474-486. J11.G5 1843-44
780 Clay, Henry. [Letters] on the Texas question. April 17 and
July 27, 1844.
Nile? register, M ay 4, Aug. 31, 1844, v. 66: 152-153; p. 439.
JK1.N5.V.66
781 Field, David Dudley. [The annexation of Texas.]
{In his Speeches, arguments, and miscellaneous papers,
Edited by Titus Munson Coan, v. 3, p. 1-5. New York, 1890.
22* cm .)
E415.7.F45,v.3
137190°— 20 11
162 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
782 Gallatin, Albert. [Letters] to D. Dudley Field. 17th De-
cember. 1844 and 10th February. 1845.
(hi The Writings of Allien Gallatin, ed. by Henry Adams.
v. 2, p. 005-610. Philadelphia, 1879. 25 em .)
On the constitutional character of the resolution for annexing
Texas by legislative act.
E338.G16,v.2
783 Hoist, Hermann Eduard von. John C. Calhoun.
Boston, Nt w York, Houghton, Mifjlvn and company, 1892.
vi, 356 p. 18 cm . (American statesmen, ed. by J. T.
Mors, . jr. [v. 2,!])
Texas, p. 222-260.
..." appeal from the Senate, which had the unquestionahle
right to reject a treaty, to the House of Representatives,
to which no power had been given by the Constitution in
relation to treaties," page 246.
10-12004 E340.C15H63
784 Sedgwick, Theodore. Thoughts on the proposed annexation of
Texas to the United States. First published in the New
York Evening post, under the signature of Veto, (Theo-
dore Sedgwick.) Together with the address of Albert
Gallatin, ll. d. delivered at the Tabernacle meeting, held
on the 24th of April, 1844. 2d ed.
Ni "• York. Printed by S. 11*. Benedict & co., 1844. 56 p.
J.'h cm .
Regards the treaty of annexation sent by the President to the
Senate in excess of the rights conferred upon the treaty-
making power.
3-73 F390.S46
785 U. S. Congress. Debate in the Senate concerning the treaty
for the annexation of Texas.
Congressional globe, 28th Cong. 1st scss., 1843-1844. Ap-
pendix. (See Index, p. mi.)
J11.G5 1843-44
786 Senate. Committee on foreign relations. Report
[from] the Committee on foreign relations, to which
have been referred sundry joint resolutions and a bill on
the subject of the annexation of Texas, and also sundry in-
structions of state legislature-, and memorials and peti-
tions on the same subject. Feb. 4, 18 !•">.
[ Washington, 1845.] 23 P . 23™. (28th Cong. 2d sess.
Senate. Doc. 79.) Serial no. 451
Includes a discussion of the treaty-making power with refer-
ence to the acquisition of foreign territory.
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 163
787 TJ. S. 29th Congress. Special session of the Senate. 1845.
[Resolutions] That in executing the authority conferred
by the joint resolution of Congress entitled "A joint reso-
tion for the annexation of Texas to the United States," the
President of the United States, will best conform to the
provisions of the Constitution by resorting to the treaty-
making power for the purpose of accomplishing the ob-
jects of that resolution. That the Secretary be directed to
lay before the President of the United States a copy of
this resolution. [March 10, 1845 and March 20, 1845.]
(In Journal of the executive proceedings of the Senate of the
United States of America, vol. VI, p. 429-453. Washington,
1887. 23 cm .) Serial no. 448
788 Van Buren, Martin. Letter on annexation. April 20, 1844.
Niles* register, May 4, 1844, v. 66: 153-157. jki.N5,v.66
789 Walker, Robert James. Letter of Mr. Walker, of Mississippi,
relative to the reannexation of Texas : in reply to the call
of the people of Carroll County, Kentucky, to communi-
cate his views on that subject.
Washington,, Printed at the Globe office, 1844- 32 p. 25 cm .
Methods by which territory may be acquired : p. 4-5.
10-5370 F390.W183
790 Speech of Mr. Walker, of Mississippi : delivered in the
United States Senate, May 20 and 21, in secret session on
the treaty for the reannexation of Texas. (The injunc-
tion of the secrecy removed.)
Washington, Printed at the Globe office, 1844- %0 p. 24\ cm .
10-1553 F390.W19
791 Woodbury, Levi. Speech of Mr. Woodbury, of New Hamp-
shire, in executive session, on the treaty for the reannexa-
tion of Texas to the United States : delivered in the Senate
of the United States, June 4, 1844.
{Washington? 1844] 30 p. 24\ cm .
18^621 F390.W88
1848— MEXICO
792 Reeves, Jesse S. The treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo.
American historical review, Jan. 1905, v. 10: 309-324.
E171.A57,v.lO
164 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
793 U. S. Treaties, etc., 1845-1849 {Polk) Message from the
President of the United States, communicating a copy of
the treaty with the Mexican Republic, of February 2, 1848,
and of the correspondence in relation thereto, and recom-
mending measures for carrying the same into effect. July
6, 1848. Eead, and ordered to be printed.
[ Washington, 1848] 72 p. 26 cm . {30th Cong., 1st sess.
Senate Ex. [doc] 60)
11-2903 E408.TJ581
1850— GREAT BRITAIN (CLAYTON-BULWER TREATY)
794 Bell, John. Speech of Hon. John Bell, of Tennessee, upon our
relations with Great Britain, delivered in the Senate of
the United States. February 26, 1856.
Washington, Printed at the Congressional globe office, 1856.
15 p. 24\ cm .
11-10827 F1436.B43
795 Bigelow, John. Breaches of Anglo-American treaties; a study
in history and diplomacy.
New York, Stnrgis & Walton company, 1917. 1 p. I., v-xi,
248 p. in fold. maps. 19\ cm .
" About two-thirds of the work is taken up with . . . the Clay-
ton -P.ulwor treaty." — I'rei".
Bibliography: p. 231-236.
17-11357 JX1428.G7B5
796 Clayton, John Middleton. Speech delivered in the Senate of
the United States on the 8th of March, 1853, in vindica-
tion of the Central American treaty concluded with Great
Britain on the 19th of April, 1850.
Washington, Printed by Kirhwood & McGill, 1853. 43 p.
23 cm .
9-9SG0 F1436.C63
797 Speech ... on the Central American treaty of April
19, 1850; delivered in the Senate of the United States,
March 17 and 19, 1856.
Washington, Printed at the Congressional globe office.
1856. 21 p. 22\™.
11-255] t F1436.C64
798 Cling-man, Thomas Lanier. Speech . . . against the Clayton-
Bulwer treaty, and in favor of American ascendency in
tin' Gulf of Mexico and Central America. Delivered in
the House of represent at ive~. May 5, 1858.
Washington, Printed at th< Congressional globe office, 1858.
16 />■ 24 cm .
11-25513 F1436.C66
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 165
799 [Comegys, Joseph Parsons] The Clayton-Bulwer treaty and
the report of the committee of the House on foreign rela-
tions against it.
[n. p., 1880] cover-title, % p. 24 cm .
Signed : A Delawarean.
6-5359 TC773.C73
800 Douglas, Stephen Arnold. Speech of Hon. Stephen A. Doug-
las of Illinois, on the Monroe doctrine. Delivered in the
Senate of the United States, February 14, 1853.
Washington, Printed by L. Towers, 1853. cover-title, 16
p. 22 cm .
Explaining the author's opposition to the ratification of the
Clayton-Bulwer treaty.
ca 18-417 JX1425.D75
801 Everett, Edward. Speech ... on the Central American treaty.
Delivered in the Senate of the United States, March 21,
1853.
Washington, Printed at the Congressional globe office, 1853.
13 p. %4 cm .
11-25512 F1436.E93
802 Keasbey, Lindley Miller. The early diplomatic history of the
Nicaragua canal.
Newark, N. J., The Holbrook printing company, 1890. viii,
130 p. fold. map. 23 cm .
6-4974 TC784.K23
803 The Nicaragua canal and the Monroe doctrine; a politi-
cal history of isthmus transit, with special reference to
the Nicaragua canal project and the attitude of the United
States government thereto.
New York [etc.] G. P. Putnam's sons, 1896. osvii, 622 p.
4 maps (incl. front.) 23\ cm .
3-31714 TC784.K24
804 The terms and tenor of the Clayton-Bulwer treaty.
American academy of political and social science. Annals,
Nov. 1899, v. U: 285-309. Hl.A4,v.i4
805 Moore, John Bassett. A digest of international law.
Washington, Govt, print, off., 1906. 8 v. 21& em . (U. S.
56th Cong., 2d sess. House. Doc. 551.)
Clayton-Bulwer treaty : v. 3, p. 130-210.
JX237.M7,v.3
166 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
80G Olney, Richard. The Clayton-Bulwer treaty; memorandum.
(Reprint)
Washington, 1900. 16 p. U cm .
2-18453 F1438.051
807 [Squier, Ephraim George] Question anglo-americaine. Docu-
ments officiels echanges entre les Etats-Unis et l'Angle-
terre au sujet de l'Amerique Centrale et du traite Clayton-
Bulwer.
Pans, Stassin et Xavier, 1856. 2 p. I., 225 p., 1 I. fold,
map. 22 cm .
4-9902 F1438.S77
808 Travis, Ira Dudley. The history of the Clayton-Bulwer treaty.
[Ann Arbor, The Association, 1900] ix, 312 p. front,
(fold, map) 24 rm . (Publications of the Michigan po-
litical science association, [vol. iii, no. 8])
Bibliography: p. [309]-312.
2-7o.:T H31.M6 vol.3
F1438.T78
809 U. S. Congress. House. Committee on foreign affairs. The
Clayton-Bulwer treaty. Report. April 16, 1880.
[Washington, 1880.] 7 p. 23'' m . (46th Cong., 2d sess.
House. Report no. 1121.) Serial no. 1937
Recommending that steps be taken to abrogate the treaty.
810 Interoceanic canal and the Monroe doc-
trine. [Report] Feb. 14, 1881.
[Washington, 1881.] xi,(l),49p. 23 cm . (46th Cong., 3d
sess. House. Report, no. 224.) Serial no. 1982
Reporting resolutions affirming the Monroe doctrine, espe-
cially as applied to the control of an isthmian canal, and
requesting President to take steps for the abrogation of
treaties in conflict with the declaration of principles con-
tained in the resolutions. P. 1-49 are given to notes of a
hearing Jan. 11-27, 1881. The notes include: Views of Mr.
Allen Thomdike Rice, Mr. Crapo, Mr. S. L. Phelps, Admiral
Aiiiini'ii, James B. Eads, Seiior Maximo Jerez, William H.
"\\viib, ;iik1 .Mr. Thompson.
811 Interoceanic canal and the Monroe doc-
trine. Views of the minority. March 4, 1881.
[Washington, 1881.] 9 p. 23 cm . (46th Cong.. 3d sess.
H0U8e, Report, no. 224, pt. 2.) Serial no, 1982
Signed by Benjamin Wilson.
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 167
812 TJ. S. Congress. House. Committee on foreign affairs. The
construction or control of interoceanic canals at the Isth-
mus of Darien and in Central America by European gov-
ernments. Report. March 2, 1889.
[Washington, 1889.'] 28 p. 23™. (50th Cong. 2d sess.
House. Report no. lf.167.) Serial no. 2675
" Views of the minority," p. 13-28.
813 Select committee on the inter-oceanic ship canal.
The Monroe doctrine. [Report] . . . March 3, 1881.
{Washington, 1881.] 9 p. 23 cm . (46th Cong. 3d sess.
House. Report no. 390.) Serial no. 1983
Recommends the adoption of resolutions, reported to the
House of Representatives March 8, 1880, affirming the Mon-
roe doctrine, especially as applied to the control of an inter-
oceanic canal, and requesting the President to take steps for
the abrogation of treaties in conflict with the declaration of
principles contained in the resolutions.
814 Senate. Resolution [submitted by Mr. Eaton, "that
the President of the United States be requested to trans-
mit to the Senate copies of all correspondence between
this government and any foreign government since Feb-
ruary, 1869, respecting a ship canal across the Isthmus
between North America and South America, together
with copies of any project of treaties respecting the same
•which the Department of State may have proposed or
submitted since that date to any foreign power or its
diplomatic representative"]. Dec. 4, 1879.
[Washington, 1879.] 1 p. 23 cm . (46th Cong., 2d sess.
Senate. Misc. doc. no. 9.) Serial no. 1890
815 Committee on foreign relations. Report [from]
the committee on foreign relations, to whom was referred
the message of the President of the United States of the
4th of January, and to whom also has been referred the
resolution of the Senate adopted on the 27th of the same
month. Feb. 11, 1853.
[Washington, 1853.] 17 p. 23 cm . (32d Cong. 2d sess.
Senate. Rept. no. 407.) Serial no. 671
On alleged treaty violation by Great Britain through the es-
tablishment of a new colony in Central America. With ref-
erence to the Senate resolution, the committee reported :
"Resolved, (as the opinion of the committee,) That the dec-
laration on the part of the British government, and the reply
thereto by the Secretary of State, as preliminary to the ex-
change of ratifications of the treaty, concluded at Washing-
ton, between the governments of Great Britain and the
United States, on the 19th April, 1850, import nothing more
168 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
than an admission on the part of the two governments, or
their functionaries, at the time of such exchange that noth-
ing contained in the treaty was to be considered as affecting
the title, or existing rights, of Great Britain to the English
settlements in Honduras Bay.
" And, consequently, in the opinion of the committee, that no
measures are necessary on the part of the Senate, to be
taken because of such declaration and reply."
816 U. S. Congress. Senate. Committee on foreign relations.
[Resolution reported] from the committee on foreign
relations. Feb. 16, 1881.
[Washington, 1881.'] 1 p. 23 cm . (46th Cong., 3d sess. Sen-
ate. Misc. doc. no. 42.) Serial no. 1944
Affirming that the consent of the United States is a necessary
condition precedent to the construction of an Isthmian canal
or participation in its use by other nations.
817 Report [from] the committee on foreign
relations [on the Maritime canal company of Nicaragua
and the interests of the United States.] Jan. 10, 1891.
[If 'ashing ton, 1891.] 215 p. plates, maps, plans. 23 cm .
(51st Cong., 2d sess. Senate. Report 1944-)
Serial no. 2826
The report is of twenty pages; the rest of the document is
given to various appendices and the report of a hearing,
May 22, 1890.
818 Dept. of state. Tigre island and Central America.
Message from the President of the United States, trans-
mitting documents in answer to a resolution of the House
respecting Tigre island, &c, &c. July 18, 1850.
[Washington. 1850.] 328 p. folded maps. 23 cm . (31st
Cong., 1st sess. House. Ex. doc. no. 75.) Serial no. 579
On April 19, 1850, the Clayton-Bulwer treaty was concluded
and on July 5, it was proclaimed. The text of the treaty
is here given, together with correspondence between the
American Secretary of State and the British plenipotentiary
at the time it was concluded, and a report by the Secretary
of State relative to negotiations with Central America, witli
;i copy of the special convention with Nicaragua, of Sept.
15, 1849.
819 Message from the President of the United States,
commui icating, in compliance with a resolution of the
Senate, information in relation to the difficulties between
the British authorities and San Salvador. Feb. 28, 1851.
[Washington, 185//} 99 p. folded map. ..'->'"'. (31st
Cong., 2d sess. Senate. Ex. doc. no. 43.) Serial no. 591
In regard to the British seizure of the Island of Tigre, in the
Cult of Fonseca, <> /'■ -•>""'• (Hth Cong., 1st sess.
Senate. Ex. doc. no. 105.) Serial no. 825
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 173
835 U. S. Dept. of state. Message of the President of the United
States, communicating, in compliance with the resolution
of the Senate of the 17th instant, correspondence between
the Department of State and the ministers from Great
Britain and France, in relation to losses sustained by citi-
zens of those countries at the bombardment of Greytown.
Dec. 23, 1857.
[Washington, 1857.] 11 p. 23 cm . {35th Cong., 1st sess.
Senate. Ex. doc. no. 9.) Serial no. 918
836 ■ Message of the President of the United States,
communicating, in compliance with the resolution of the
Senate, the correspondence between the Department of
State and the minister of Bremen, on the subject of claims
for losses alleged to have been sustained by subjects of
the Hause towns at the bombardment of Greytown. Dec.
29, 1857.
[Washington, 1857.] 24 p. 23 cm . (35th Cong., 1st sess.
Senate. Ex. doc. no. 10.) Serial no. 918
837 Message of the President of the United States,
communicating, in compliance with the resolution of the
Senate of January 4, 1858, the correspondence, instruc-
tions, and orders to the United States naval forces on
the coast of Central America, connected with the arrest
of Wm. Walker and his associates, at or near the port of
San Juan de Nicaragua. Jan. 7, 1858.
[Washington, 1858.] 38 p. 23 cm . {35th Cong., 1st sess.
Senate. Ex. doc. no. 13.) Serial no. 918
838 Nicaragua — seizure of General Walker. Mes-
sage from the President of the United States, relative to
the seizure of General William Walker and his followers
in Nicaragua. Jan. 11, 1858.
[Washington, 1858.] 82 p. 23 cm . (35th Cong., 1st sess.
House. Ex. doc. no. 24--) Serial no. 950
839 Message of the President of the United States
communicating, in compliance with the resolution of the
Senate of the 7th instant, information in relation to the
condition of the commercial relations between the United
States and the Spanish- American states on this conti-
nent, and between these countries and other nations. July
14, 1870.
[Washington, 1870.] 13 p 23 cm . (41st Cong., 2d sess.
Senate. Ex. doc. no. 112.) Serial no. 1407
174 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
840 U. S. Dept. of state. International ship-canal. Resolution of
the House of Representatives and letter from the Secre-
tary of State in relation to an international ship-canal.
May 20, 1872.
[Washington, 1872.'] 2 p. 23 cm . (J$d Cong., M sess.
House. Misc. doc. no. 219.) Serial no. 1527
" It has not been the policy of this Government to complicate
the practical question of the construction of such a canal
by encouraging discussions or negotiations with European
powers on the subject."
841 The Darien interoceanic canal. Message from
the President of the United States, transmitting a report
from the secretary of state relative to the steps taken by
the Government of the United States to promote the con-
struction of an interoceanic canal across the Isthmus of
Darien. June 13, 1879.
[Washington, 1879.] 3 p. 23 cm . (46th Cong., 1st sess.
House Ex. doc. no. 10.) Serial no. 1875
842 Interoceanic canal. Message from the Presi-
dent of the United States, transmitting, in response to a
resolution of the House of Representatives, copies of cor-
respondence in relation to the interoceanic canal. March
8, 1880.
[Washington, 1880.] 2 p. 23 cm . (46th Cong., 2d sess.
House Ex. doc. no. 57.) Serial no. 1925
Correspondence Is printed with Senate ex. doc. no. 112, -ICth
Cong., 2d. sess.
843 Message from the President of the United
States, in response to Senate resolution of Feb. 11, 1880,
covering report of secretary of state, with accompanying
documents, in relation to the proposed interoceanic canal
between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. March 8, 1880.
[Washington, 1880.] 152 p. 23 cm . (46th Cong., 2d sess.
Senate. Ex. doc. no. 112.) Serial no. 1885
Papers transmitted in response to a Senate resolution re-
questing "copies <»f all correspondence between this govern-
ment and any foreign government since February, 1869,
respecting a ship-canal across the Isthmus between North
America and South America, together with copies of any
projet of treaties respecting the same which the Depart-
ment of State may have proposed or submitted since that
date to any foreign power or its diplomatic representative."
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 175
844 U. S. Deft, of state. Message from the President of the United
States, transmitting the report of the Secretary of State
in response to Senate resolution of the 14th October 1881,
with accompanying document, relative to the projected
interoceanic canal at Panama. Oct. 24, 1881.
[Washington, 1881.] 4 p. 23 cm . (47th Cong., Special
sess. Ex. doc. no. 5.) Serial no. 1985
Gives the letter of instruction to the United States minister in
London.
845 Message from the President of the United
States, transmitting, in response to Senate resolution of
December 12, 1881, a report from the secretary of state,
touching the proposed modification of the Clayton-
Bulwer treaty of April 19, 1850, between the United
States and Great Britain. Dec. 15, 1881.
[Washington, 1881.] 7 p. 23 cm . (47th Cong., 1st sess.
/Senate. Ex. doc. no. 16.) Serial no. 1986
Gives Mr. Blaine's instruction to Mr. Lowell.
846 The Clayton-Bulwer treaty and the Monroe
doctrine. A letter from the secretary of state to the
minister of the United States at London dated May 8,
1882, with sundry papers and documents explanatory of
the same, selected from the archives of the Department
of state.
Washington, Govt, print, off., 1882. 203 p. 23 cm . (47th
Cong., 1st sess. Senate. Ex. doc. 194.) Serial no. 1991
The letter of the Secretary of State communicates, " some-
what at length, the opinions entertained here respecting
the traditional continental policy of the United States
and the Clayton-Bulwer treaty."
The explanatory docunfents and papers cover the dates Feb.
10, 1763- June 1, 1882.
10-3786 JX 1425. A3 1882
847 Message from the President of the United
States, transmitting, in further compliance with Senate
resolution of December 12, 1881, the remainder of the
correspondence touching the desired modification of
the Clayton-Bulwer treaty. Jan. 27, Feb. 17, June 6,
1882.
[Washington, 1882.] 3 pts. 23 cm . (47th Cong., 1st sess.
Senate. Ex. doc. no. 78. Pts. 1-3.) Serial no. 1989
176 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
848 U. S. Dcpt. of .state. Message from the President of the United
States, transmitting, in response to the Senate resolution
of the 18th instant, a report of the Secretary of State and
accompanying papers relating to the treaty between the
United States and Great Britain, signed April 19, 1850.
Dec. 19. 1883.
[Washington, 1883.'] 15 p. 23 cm . (48th Cong., 1st sess.
Senate. Ex. doc. no. 26.) Serial no. 2162
849 [Dispatches, 1881-1882, of Mr. George Maney,
formerly our minister at Bogota, relative to the Panama
canal.] * Dec. 10, 1881.
[Washington, 1884.] 8 p. 23 cm . (48th Cong., 2d sess.
Senate. Misc. doc. no. 12.) Serial no. 2170
850 Message from the President of the United
States, in response to the Senate resolution of December
4, 1894, transmitting a report from the Secretary of State,
with accompanying papers, relating to affairs at Blue-
fields, in the Mosquito territory. Jan. 3, 1895.
[Washington, 1895.] 207 p. 23 cm . (53d Cong., 3d sess.
Senate. Ex. doc. no. 20.) Serial no. 3275
" Great Britain, it is proper to say, has given this Govern-
ment the most positive assurance that she asserts no right
of sovereignty or protection over the territory, but on the
contrary respects the full and paramount sovereignty of the
Government of Nicaragua." Report of Mr. Greshani, p. 3.
851 Correspondence and other papers relating to the
proposed interoceanic ship canal, being a reprint of an
executive document of the special session of March 4,
1857, and of document no. 194 of the Forty-seventh con-
gress, first session. Feb. 8, 1900.
[Washington, 1900.] (2), 203 p. 23 cm . (56th Cong., 1st
sess. Senate. Doc. 161.) Serial no. 3853
The first reprint noted was "originally printed as an execu-
tive document, special session of March 4, 1857"; the other
document noted appears as Senate ex. doc. no. 194, 47th
Cong., 1st sess., " The Clayton-Bulwer treaty and the Monroe
doctrine."
852 Correspondence in relation to an interoceanic
canal between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, the Clay-
ton-Bulwer treaty and the Monroe doctrine, and the treaty
between the United States and New Granada of Decem-
ber 12, 1846, comprising a reprint of Senate executive
docs. no. 112, 4Gth Congress, 2d session; no. 194, 47th Con-
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 177
gress, 1st session; and no. 2G, 18th Congress, 1st session;
and correspondence not heretofore communicated to Con-
gress. March 21, 1900.
[Washington, 1900.'] 548 p. 23 cm . (56th Cong., 1st sess.
/Senate. Doc. 231.) Serial no. 3853
Includes also Senate misc. doc. no. 12, 48th Cong., 2d sess.
" Correspondence not heretofore communicated to Congress,"
p. 437-548.
853 Dept of state. History of amendments proposed to the
Clayton-Bulwer treaty.
Washington, Govt, print, off., 1911. 31 p. 23\ cm . {61st
Cong., 3d sess. /Senate. Doc. 746.) Serial no. 5943
A brief history of the amendments proposed and considered
relative to the Clayton-Bulwer treaty with Great Britain,
resulting in the treaty submitted December 14, 1901. Pre-
pared in the Department of state, and sent by Mr. Hay to
the Committee on foreign relations.
11-35109 TC773.U7 1911
854 Navy dcpt. Report of the Secretary of the navy, com-
municating in compliance with a resolution of the Senate,
the correspondence between the president of Nicaragua
and Commodore Paulding in relation to the capture of
Walker and his command in December, 1857. December
23, 1858.
[Washington, 1858.] 5 p. 23 cm . (35th Cong., 2d sess.
Senate. Ex. doc. 10.) Serial no. 981
855 President (Pierce). Message from the President of the
United States to the two houses of Congress, at the com-
mencement of the first session of the thirty-fourth Con-
gress. Dec, 31, 1855.
[Washingto?i, 1855] 120 p. 23 cm . (34th Cong., 1st sess.
House. Ex. doc. 1.) Serial no. 840
Also appears as Sen. ex. doc. no. 1, 34th Cong., 1st sess.
Includes a review of affairs in Central America with reference
to the treaty of April 19, 1850, and transmits papers on the
subject.
856 President (Buchanan) Message of the President of
the United States, to the two houses of Congress at the
commencement of the first session of the thirty-fifth Con-
gress. Dec. 8, 1857.
[Washington, 1857.] 56 p. 23 cm . (35th Cong., 1st sess.
/Senate. Ex. doc. 11.) Serial no. 919
Clayton-Bulwer treaty, p. 9-13.
137190°— 20 12
178 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
857 U. S. Presidi nt (Buchanan). Message of the President of the
United States to the two houses of Congress at the com-
mencement of the second session of the thirty-fifth Con-
gress. Dec. 6, 1858.
[Washington, 1858.] 72 p. 23™. (35th Cong., 2d sess.
Senate Ex. doc. 1.) Serial no. 974
Clayton-Bulwer treaty, p. 12-13; Central American affairs, p.
19-22, 51-67.
858 Treaties, etc., 1849-1850 (Taylor) Convention between
the United States and Great Britain, for facilitating and
protecting the construction of a ship canal between the
Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, and for other purposes. Con-
cluded April 19, 1850 . . . By the President of the
United States ... a proclamation.
[Washington, 1850.] 5 p. 23 cm .
Proclamation with text of Clayton-Bulwer treaty.
6-6559 TC773.TJ7 1850
859 The Clayton and Bulwer convention, of the 19th
April, 1850, between the British and American govern-
ments, concerning Central America : with the correspond-
ence between the negotiators, agreeing that the conven-
tion excludes British Honduras from its operation; and
also, the correspondence between the Earl of Clarendon
and Mr. Buchanan, United States minister at London, in
relation to the true construction of this convention.
London* Triibner and co., 1856. 63 p. 20 cm .
11-24509 F1436.TJ58
8G0 Williams, Mary Wilhelmine. Anglo-American Isthmian diplo-
macy, 1815-1915.
[Baltimore, The Lord Baltimore press, 1916] xii, 356 p.
double map. 18\ cm . (Prize essays of the American his-
torical association. 1914)
Bibliography : p. 331-345.
16-14077 JX1398.1.W5 1916a
1853— MEXICO
861 Smith, Gerrit. Speech on the Mexican treaty and "Monroe
doctrine." June 27, 1854.
(In his Speeches ... in Congress, p. 287-303. New York,
1855. 19*"".)
E431.S64
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 179
862 U. S. 33d Cong., 1st sess. The Congressional Globe. 1853-
1854.
City of Washington: Printed at the office of John C. Rives,
185 4y 3 parts and appendix. 4° •
"There is a provision in the [Gadsen] treaty for the payment
by the United States to Mexico of the sum of $7,000,000
on the exchange of ratifications, and the further sum of
$3,000,000 when the boundaries of the ceded territories shall
be settled. To be enabled to comply with the stipulation,
according to the terms of the treaty relative to the payments
therein mentioned, it will be necessary that Congress should
make an appropriation of $7,000,000 for that purpose, before
the 30th instant, and also the further sum of $3,000,000, to
be paid when the boundaries shall be established. I there-
fore respectfully request that these sums may be put at the
disposal of the Executive."— Message of President Pierce,
June 20, 1854, Globe, p. 1466.
Bill to enable the President to fulfill the third article of the
treaty, discussed, p. 1476, 1519, 1520-1524, 1535-1536, 1536-
1549, 1561-1565.
The speeches by Solomon G. Haven, p. 1537-1540, Joshua R.
Giddings, p. 1541-1542, Israel Washburn, p. 1542-1543, Wil-
liam W. Boyce, p. 1543-1545, and John S. Millson, p. 1546-
1548, are especially to be noted.
Speeches reported in the Appendix are as follows By J. Glancy
Jones, p. 1008-1011; By Gerrit Smith, p. 1015-1017; By P.
Phillips, p. 1018-1021 ; By R. W. Peckham, p. 1028-1031 ; By
Thomas H. Benton, p. 1031-1037 ; By T. H. Bayly, p. 1042-
1045 ; By T. S. Bocock, p. 1045-1050.
863 President (Pierce). Treaty — United States and Mex-
ico. Message from the President of the United States,
transmitting a copy of the treaty between the United
States of America and the republic of Mexico, June 20,
1854.
[Washington, 1854..] 5 p. 23 cm . (33d Cong., 1st sess.
House. Ex. doc. 109.) Serial no. 726
In the message Congress is asked for appropriations to make
the treaty effective.
1854— GREAT BRITAIN
864 Davis, Agnes M. Eeciprocity treaty of 1854.
Women's Canadian historical society, Ottawa. Transac-
tions, 1915, v. 6: 104-112.
180 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
865 Robinson, Chalfant. A history of two reciprocity treaties:
the treaty with Canada in 1854, the treaty with the Ha-
waiian Islands in 1876, with a chapter on the treaty-mak-
ing power of the House of representatives.
[New Haven, Conn., The Tuttle, Morehouse & Taylor press,
1904] ®%0 p. fold, map, fold, tab., diagrs. (1 fold.)
2JV>".
Bibliographies: p. [78]-82, [157J-160, [176]
5-41966 HF1732.A1R5
866 Sumner, Charles. Termination of the Canadian reciprocity
treaty. Speeches in the Senate, on the joint resolution
giving notice for the termination of the Canadian reci-
procity treaty, December 21, 1864, January 11 and 12, 1865.
(In his Works, v. 9, p. 178-191. Boston, 1874. 20* cm .)
E415.6.S93.V.9
Citations : Story on the Constitution, vol. 2, sec. 1838 ; Ware v.
Hylton, 3 Dallas, R., 261 ; The Prize Cases, 2 Black. R., 671 ;
Brown v. The United States, 8 Cranch, 131, 132, 133.
867 U. S. 38th Cong., 1st sess. The Congressional Globe.
Washington: Congressional globe office, 1864- 4 V^ 8 - 4°-
Steps were taken, but unsuccessfully, during the first session
of the thirty-eighth Congress to abrogate the Canadian reci-
procity treaty of 1854. For resolutions and discussions, see
p. 19, 1387, 2333-2338. 2364-2371. 2452, 2453-2456, 2476-
2482, 2482-2484, 2502-2509, and Appendix, p. 119-120.
868 38th Cong., M sess. The Congressional Globe.
Washington: Congressional globe office, 1865. 2 pts. 4° •
During the second session of the thirty-eighth Congress a
joint resolution was passed authorizing the President to
terminate the Canadian reciprocity treaty and to appoint
commissioners to negotiate a new treaty.
Action in the House of Representatives, p. 31-33, 35, 265, 267,
276-277, 291.
Action in the Senate, p. 34, 35, 71, 95-97, 204-213, 226-234, 293.
Mr. Collamer (p. 209-210) held that the Canadian treaty was
in conflict with the revenue-raising clause of the Constitu-
tion, and Mr. Howe (p. 211-212) took issue with this view.
869 Congress. House. Committee on foreign affairs.
Commercial relations with Canada and other states on
the American Continent. Report. July 5, 1884.
[ Washington, 1884.} ■>' />■ %3 cm - (48th Cong., 1st sess.
House. Report 2140.) Serial no. 2259
Report on a joint resolution requesting the President to ne-
gotiate with the government of Great Britain for the re-
newal of the reciprocity treaty of 1854.
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 181
" The committee ... in recognition of the fact that the Con-
stitution has prescribed that all measures affecting the reve-
nues of the Government should originate in the House, con-
sider it eminently fit that the House should give expression
to its opinion regarding international agreements which
' may affect such revenues."
870 Congress. Senate. Committee on finance. Reciprocity
with Canada. Compilation of documents relating to the
proposed agreement of 1911 and to the treaty of 1854, and
its subsequent operation.
Washington, Govt, print, off., 1911. [846] p. %2\ cm .
Special message of President Taft, Jan. 26, 1911, with corre-
spondence ; H. R. 32216 "An act to promote reciprocal trade
relations with the Dominion of Canada ..." introduced
in the House Jan. 28, 1911 ; Reports and hearings of the
Committee on ways and means, etc., etc.
11-16477 HF1732.C2A4 1911c
871 Whitman, William. Objections to reciprocity on constitutional
and practical grounds.
Boston, The Rockwell and Churchill press, 1904. 35 p.
23 cm .
5-22961 HF1731.W6
1867— RUSSIA (Alaska purchase)
872 The Alaska purchase. A resolution was presented by Mr.
Butler of Mass., Dec. 7, 1867, " That so much of the Presi-
dent's message as relates to the payment of money for the
Russian possessions which are the subject of negotiation
between the several Governments be referred to the Com-
mittee on Appropriations. Disagreed to ; referred to the
Committee on Foreign affairs. The resolution was
brought up again, Dec. 9, 1867, and was debated by Na-
thaniel P. Banks, Eobert C. Schenck, Cadwalader C.
Washburn, and Elihu B. Washburne.
(In Congressional globe, 40th Cong., 2d sess. pt. 1, p. 92-95.)
Dec. 11, 1867 the question was again brought up on a resolu-
tion presented by Mr. Washburn of Wisconsin, that any
more purchase of territory would be inexpedient. Debated
by Cadwalader C. Washburn, Congressional Globe, 40th
Cong., 2d sess.. pt. 1, p. 135-139 ; John M. Broomall, p. 139-
143 ; Elihu B. Washburne, p. 143-144.
The purchase of Alaska was again brought up for debate
March 14, 1868 and was discussed by William Higby, Con-
gressional globe, 40th Congress, 1st session, pt. 2, pp. 1870-
1874, and Cadwalader C. Washburn, pp. 1875-1876. These
182 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
debates were principally directed to the treaty-making
power. In May 186S a bill providing for an appropriation
to carry into effect the treaty with Alaska was introduced
by Nathaniel P. Banks; was not debated until June 30, 1868,
when Mr. Banks addressed the committee, his speech was
published in the Appendix. William Loughbridge of Iowa,
spoke on the question. Congressional globe, 40th Cong., 2d
sess., pt. 4, p. 3621-3625 ; The debate was continued by Mr.
Boyer and Mr. Pruyn, their speeches were published in the
Appendix, James A. Johnson, of California, spoke on the
question, p. 3625-362S ; July 1, 1868, the bill was debated by
Orange Ferris, James Mullins, Leonard Myers and John A.
Peters, p. 3661-3670. The bill was again discussed, July 7,
1S68, by William Higby, Dennis McCarthy, Green B. Rauin
& Rufus P. Spalding, p. 3805-3814. July 10, 1868, Mr. Orth,
Mr. Blair and Mr. Culloni obtained leave to have their
speeches printed, as part of the debates on the bill. These
were published in the Appendix.
July 14, 1868, Mr. Banks, Mr. Schenck, Mr. Stevens of Penn.,
and Mr. Mungen spoke on the bill, p. 4052-4055. Mr. Banks
speech was published in the Appendix.
A report from the committee on conference was presented to
tin' House, July 23, 1868, by Mr. Banks, and was debated by
Mr. Loughbridge and others, Congressional globe, 40th Cong.,
2d sess. pt. 5, p. 4392-1394.
873 Blaine, James Gillespie. Twenty years of Congress : from Lin-
coln to Garfield. With a review of the events which led
to the political revolution of 1860.
Norwich, Conn., The Henry Bill publishing company, 1884-
86. 2 v. fronts., ports., fold. map. 2S cm .
The purchase of Alaska : v. 2, p. 333-339.
2-19439 E661.B63
874 Loughbridge, William. [The rights, the powers, and the con-
stitutional prerogatives of the House of Representatives.
Speeches on the House bill making an appropriation of
money to carry into effect the treaty with Eussia of March
30, 1867.]
Congressional Globe, 40th Congress, 2d session, pt. 4, June
30, 1868, p. 3621-3625; pt. 5, July 23, 1868, p. 4393-4394.
875 Meier, Ernst. Uber den Abschluss von Staatsvertriigen.
Leipzig, Durwker & Humblot, 1874. xiii, 368 p. 23 cm .
" Der Vertrag mit Russland wegen der Abtretung von Alaska,
L868," p. 181-19L
2-18652 JK4171.T5M4
CONSIDERATIONS IN" RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 183
876 Sumner, Charles. The cession of Russia America to the United
States. Speech in the Senate, on the ratification of the
treaty between the United States and Russia, April 9.
1867.
[In his Works, vol. 11, p. 181-349. Boston, 1877. 20F m .)
E415.6.S93,v.ll
■ Same.
{In his Complete works. Statesman ed., vol. 15, p. 1-169.
Boston, 1900. 23 cm .)
E415.6.S95,v.l5
877 U. S. Congress. House. Committee on foreign affairs. Re-
port . . . relating to the treaty with Russia, May 18, 1868.
[Washington, 1868.] 65 p. 23 cm . (40th Cong., 2d sess.
House. Report 37.) Serial no. 1357
Report presented by Mr. Banks ; treaty-making power dis-
cussed, p. 1-12.
Mr. Washburn submitted the views of the minority, treaty-
making power discussed, p. 44-51.
878 Dept. of state. Message from the President transmitting
correspondence in relation to Russian America. February
17, 1868.
[Washington, 1868.] 361 p. 23 cm . (40th Cong., 2d sess.
House. Ex. doc. 177.) Serial no. 1339
" Probably this treaty stands alone in the history of diplomacy,
as an important treaty conceived, and initiated, prosecuted
and completed, without being preceded or attended by pro-
tocols or despatches." Notes of secretary of state, printed
on page 3 of the documents accompanying the President's
message.
879 Wharton, Francis. A digest of the international law of the
United States . . . Vol. II.
Washington: Govt, print, off., 1887. (2), 832 p. 23\ cm .
JX237.W5 1887,v.2
" The tendency of the majority of the House was evidently to
sanction the Alaska purchase, but to couple the approval of
the treaty with a reservation of the right of the House to
approve or disapprove in all cases in which the sanction of
the House is necessary to execute a treaty " p. 21.
880 Yeaman, G. H. The treaty-making power.
Nation, Apr. 30, 1868, v. 6:31^9-350. AP2.N2,v.6
Discusses the constitutional question arising from the reluc-
tance of the House to make the appropriation for the pur-
chase of Alaska.
184 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
1875— HAWAIIAN ISLANDS
881 Banks, N. P. Hawaiian treaty. Speech in the House of Repre-
sentatives, April 10, 1876.
Congressional record, Jf.Jf.th Cong., 1st sess. v. 1, pt. 6, Ap-
pendix, p. 25-63. Jll.R5,v.4
..." if the House shall negative the legislation necessary to
render this treaty effective, in my opinion it will he a nullifi-
cation of one of the most important powers of the Constitu-
tion "... page 63.
Cites various precedents in support of this position.
882 Kelley, William D. The Hawaiian treaty.
Congressional record. IfJfth Cong., 1st session v. If., pt. 2,
March 6. 1876, p. Uf95-lJf98. Jli.R5,v.4, P t.2
Attacks the treaty on constitutional grounds and upon the
merits of the treaty itself.
883 Morrill, Justin S. The Hawaiian treaty.
C ongressional record, Jf.'/th Cong., 1st sess., v. Jf, pt. 6, Aug.
lJf, 1876, p.. 5567-5568. jii.R5,v.4, pt. 6
"Our Constitution provides that all revenue bills shall origi-
nate in the House of Representatives. Where did this bill
really originate? Clearly it originated in the State Depart-
ment, where the treaty was made, and not in the House of
Representatives. It is therefore, in my judgment, not only
a plain violation of the spirit of the Constitution, but it is
of the most vicious character ; for if the Executive and the
Senate may interfere and make a treaty with so unimpor-
tant a kingdom as the Hawaiian Islands, we may make it
with all other powers."
884 Hawaiian reciprocity treaty. Speech in the United
Stale- Senate, executive session, March 18, 1875.
AYashington: Govt, print, off., 1875. llf. p. 23 cm .
Regards the treaty as unconstitutional.
885 Robinson, Chalfant. A history of two reciprocity treaties:
the treaty with Canada in 1854, the treaty with the Ha-
waiian Islands in 187G. with a chapter on the treaty-mak-
ing power of the House of representatives.
[X> w II lie, ,,. ('onn., The Tuff I, . Mori house & Taylor press,
1904] mO p. fold, map, fold, tab., diagrs. (1 fold.)
23\ cm .
Bibliographies: p. [Tsj-bi', L157J-1G0, [176].
5-419G6 HF1732.A1R5
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 185
886 Thomas, Philip F. The Hawaiian treaty. Speech in the
House, May 8, 1876.
Congressional record, 44th Cong., 1st sess., v. 4, pt. 6, Ap-
pendix, p. 184-190. Jll.R5,v.4,App.
'An argument in support of the contention that in the treaty
in question the House is competent to judge of its ex-
pediency and act accordingly.
887 Tucker, J. R. Hawaiian treaty.
Congressional record, 44th Cong., 1st sess., vol. 4, pt. 4-, May
8, 1876, p. 3031-3037. Jii.R5,v.4, P t.4
Discusses in part the question of constitutional powers and in
part economic considerations involved.
XT. S. 44th Cong., 1st sess. Congressional record. Vol. 4.
Washington: Govt, print, off., 1876. 8 pts. 4°>
H. R. 612-To carry into effect a convention between the
United States and His Majesty the King of the Hawaiian
Islands, signed 30th day of January, 1875: Introduced, p.
300 ; Referred to the committee of ways and means, p.
300 ; Reported back, considered, and • passed by House, p.
1268, 1419-1426, 1461-1465, 1488-1499, 1596-1604, 2270-2281,
2360, 3031-3037; Referred to the Senate committee on for-
eign relations, p. 3083 ; Reported back, considered, and re-
ferred to the Senate committee on finance, p. 4261 ; Recon-
sidered and passed by the Senate, p. 4265, 4266, 5462, 5463,
5485-5491, 5522-5524, 5533-5535, 5563-5572; Approved by
the President, p. 5691.
Jll.R5,v.4
889 Congress. House. Committee on ways and means.
Report . . . The bill (H. R, 612) to carry into effect a
convention between the United States and His Majesty
the King of the Hawaiian Islands, signed on the 30th day
of January, 1875. Feb. 24, 1876.
[Washington, 1876.] 12 p. 23 cm . (44th Cong., 1st sess.
House. Report. 116.) Serial no. 1708
" The treaty, in consequence of its abolition of the duty now
imposed by law in the United States on the articles enum-
erated in the schedule, requires an act of Congress to carry
it into effect. Unlike most of the treaties made with for-
eign nations, not only the consent of the House of Repre-
sentatives is required to give it validity, but the proposition
to do so must begin there," p. 3.
890 Hawaiian treaty. The views of the mi-
nority.
{Washington, 1876.] 6 p. 23 cm . (44th Cong., 1st sess.
House. Report. 116, p. 2.) Serial no. 1708
A discussion of the expediency of the treaty ; not of consti-
tutional principles involved.
186 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
891 U. S. 47th Cong., 2d sess. Congressional record.
Washington: Govt, print, off., 1882. 5 v. 4°.
S. Res. 122, providing for the termination of the Hawaiian
reciprocity treaty of Jan. 30, 1875, introduced by Mr. Mor-
rill, p. 921; referred to committee on finance, p. 1003-1005;
reported back with amendment and referred to committee
on foreign relations, p. 3322.
Jll.E,5,v.l4
892 Congress. House. Committee on finance. Report . . .
joint resolution (S. Res. 122) providing for the termina-
tion of the reciprocity treaty of Jan. 30, 1875, between
the United States of America and His Majesty the King
of the Hawaiian Islands. Feb. 27, 1883.
[Washington, 1883.'] 8 p. 23 cm . (47th Cong., 2d sess.
Senate. Report, 1013.) Serial no. 2088
" The present reciprocity treaty with the Hawaiian islands is
obviously adverse to the interests of the United States, and
so much more than would now be asked for by Hawaii, that
nothing less than its abrogation affords a sufficient remedy.
Even those who would prefer a modification merely must
see that the first step to that end, or to obtain any satis-
factory result, is to wholly abrogate the present treaty.
Doubtless the notice of its abrogation might be lawfully
given by the President, or it may be done by Congress."
Views of the minority :
'■ When our Constitution was framed no compact between two
different nations such as a reciprocity treaty was known or
ever existed; and the power of the President 'with the ad-
vice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided
two-thirds of the Senate concur,' must be accepted as a
limitation of the power to just what was then known and
understood to be comprehended by the words 'to make
treaties.' The Constitution can not be changed by any mod-
ern diplomatic inventions." . . .
" Our Constitution does not lack harmony, and all of its pro-
visions show that it was never intended that the President
and the Senate should have even the initiative in regulating
trade or commerce.
"A still greater inhibition of this modern shape of the treaty
power is found in another provision of the Constitution.
which provides that — 'All bills for raising revenue shall
originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate
may propose or concur with amendments as on other bills.'
" N. reciprocity treaty could be made that would not be a
direct Infraction Of tins provision of the Constitution, as
all such treaties must necessarily curtail the boundaries
within which revenues are or can be raised. If such a
treatj could be made with one nation it would be possible
to make like treaties with all, and thus the power of the
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 187
House of Representatives to originate revenue bills would
be suspended and frittered away. It does not help the main
question in the least to obtain the consent of an existing
House of Representatives to pass a law in conformity with
or to carry out the provisions of such a treaty. The power
' of the House to originate revenue bills inheres forever, and
no existing House can exercise that power so as to deprive a
succeeding House of any of its proper Constitutional func-
tions."
893 Congress. Senate. History of Hawaiian treaty and
Cuban reciprocity. History of the Hawaiian treaty, with
a report to terminate the treaty, signed by Justin S. Mor-
rill, Daniel W. Vorhees, and Nelson W. Aldrich; also a
history of the agitation for Cuban reciprocity with the
United States, and opinions as to the probable results of
Cuban reciprocity, by Charles H. Dietrich. Data and
tables compiled by Truman G. Palmer. March 2, 1903.
[Washington, 1903.] 27 p. 23 cm . (57th Cong., 2d sess.
Senate, doc. 206.) Serial no. 4430
Includes Senate report no. 1013, 47th Cong., 2d sess., from the
Committee on finance, with views of the minority on Consti-
tutional principles involved in the Hawaiian treaty.
1883— MEXICO. 1884— SPAIN
894 U. S. Congress. House. Committee on ways and means.
Mexican treaty of January 20, 1883. Adverse report.
May 25, 1886.
[Washington, 1886.] 52 p. folded map. 23 cm . (49th Cong.,
1st sess. House. Report. 2615.) Serial no. 2443
" The bill under consideration is intended to give practical
effect to the pending commercial treaty between the United
States and Mexico. Although the right to negotiate treaties
is vested by the Constitution in the President and the Senate,
the pending treaty expressly stipulates that it shall not be
operative until laws necessary to carry it into execution
shall have been passed by the Congress of the United States
and the Government of the United Mexican States.
" The purpose and object of this proviso is evident. The treaty
pending, being purely commercial and dealing with questions
of revenue only, which under the Constitution are subject to
the exclusive control of Congress, could not be negotiated or
carried into practical effect without affirmative action on the
part of the legislative branch of the Government."
Majority report presented by Mr. Maybury, p." 1-7.
Minority report, presented by Mr. Hewitt, p. 15-30.
188 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
895 U. S. Congress. St naU . Journal of the executive proceedings
of the Senate of the United States of America from De-
cember 3, 1883, to March :',. 1885, inclusive. Vol. 24.
Printed by order of the Senate of the United States..
'Washington: Govt, print, off., 1901. 797 p. 23 cm .
Resolution to inquire into tariff and revenue features of the
.Mexican treaty, p. 128; Disagreed to, p. 129.
Resolution to consider the Spanish treaty in open session,
p. 385.
1884— HAWAIIAN ISLANDS
89G U. S. Congress. House. Committee on the judiciary. Treaty
with the Hawaiian islands. Report [by J. 11. Tucker
from] the committee on the judiciary. March 3, 1887.
[Washington, 1887.'] 23 p. 23™. (pfh Cong., 2d sess.
House. Report, ^177. Serial no. 2501
The body of the committee's report is almost identical with
House report no. 2GS0, 4Sth Congress, 2d session. These
two reports set forth in detail the view which sets a limit
on the power of the Senate to make treaties affecting duties
levied by Congress.
The report concludes ;
"The concurrent wills of both Houses and of the President
to the imposition of a duty are substituted by a treaty hav-
ing the force of law, which imposes the duty despite the
the dissent of the House, unless President and Senate agree
to relinquish it.
" Your committee believe that this is a radical change in the
equilibrium of the Constitution, which, unless reversed,
will become dangerous to the rights of the people, by pro-
moting the intervention of foreign nations in our domestic
policy of taxation, through the agency of a minority of the-
tax-payers of the country.
"Your committee, therefore, with great respect, recommend
the adoption of the following resolutions:
•"(1) That the President, by and with the advice and consent
of the Senate, cannot negotiate a treaty which shall be
binding on the United States, whereby duties on imports
are to be regulated, either by imposing or remitting, in-
creasing or decreasing them, without the sanction of an act
of Congress ; and that the extension of the term for the
operation of the original treaty or convention with the Gov-
ernment of the Hawaiian Islands, proposed by the supple-
mentary runvention of December <;, isst. will not be bind-
i'i- on the United States without like sanction, which was
provided Cor in the original treaty and convention, ami was
given by ad of < Songress.
•"(•_' 1 Thai the President is respectfully requested to with-
hold final action upon the proposed convention, and to con-
dition its final ratification upon the sanction of an act of
Congress, in respect of the duties upon articles to be im-
ported from tin- Hawaiian Islands.'"
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 189
1894— JAPAN
897 American journal of international law. Editorial. The
Japanese school question.
Ameri'can journal of inter-national law, Jan., Apr. 1907, v. 1:
150-153; 449-4-52. jxi.A6,v.1
898 Anti-federalist. The United States can enforce its law.
North American review, Dec. 21, 1906, v. 183: 1239-1250.
AP2.N7,v.l83
899 Baldwin, Simeon E. Schooling rights under our treaty with
Japan.
Columbia law review, Feb. 1907, v. 7 : 85-92.
900 Barstow, Hollen M. The treaty power and police regulation.
American lawyer, Jan. 1908, v. 16: 18-25.
Gist of the treaty with Japan.
901 Fort, J. F. [Extract on the right of a state to enact legislation
contravening international treaties] Address at Union
League Club celebration.
Chicago legal news, Feb. 27, 1909, v. 41 : 243.
New Jersey law journal, Mar. 1909, v. 32: 168-171.
902 Foster, David J. The treaty power of the government.
Congressional record, 59th Cong., 2d sess., v. 41, pt. 2, Jan.
16, 1907: 1231-1238; Jan. 22, 1907: 1522-1523.
An argument that the United States by treaty stipulation,
may relieve the subjects of a foreign power of the disabilities
of alienage respecting the public schools.
Jll.R5,v.41,pt.2
903 Fulton, C. W. American schools and Japanese pupils.
North American review, Dec. 21, 1906, v. 813: 1225-1228.
AP2.N7,v.l83
901 Gilbert, George E. The Japanese school question. Speech in
the House of Representatives, Feb. 12, 1907.
Congressional record, 59th Cong., 2d sess., v. 41, Appendix:
52-55. . Jll.R5,v.41,App.
The treaty-making power of the general government can not
invade the reserved rights of the states.
190 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
905 Hayes, Everis A. The treaty-making power of the government
and the Japanese question. Speech in the House of
representatives, Jan. 23, 1907.
Congressional record, 59th Cong., 2d sess., v. 1^1, pt. 2:
1579-1583. jii.R5,v.4i, P t.2
Holds that "the authority to make a treaty under the Con-
stitution must be discovered by exactly the same process
as the authority to pass a statute . . . The provision of the
Constitution reserving to the states or to the people all
powers not granted to the Federal Government must be just
as binding upon the treaty-making power as upon any other
branch of the government."
906 Hazeltine, Mayo W. Would England side with Japan against
the United States?
North American review, Dec. 21, 1906, v. 183: 1280-1284..
AP2.N7,v.l83
907 Hyde, Charles Cheney. The segregation of Japanese students
by the school authorities of San Francisco.
Green bag, Jan. 1907, v. 19: 38-lfi.
Treats of the subject under the headings, first, whether the
treaty of 1894 has been violated, second, the interpretation
of the treaty, third, the validity of the treaty, and fourth,
the liability of the United States to Japan if the treaty
has been violated. Concludes that a treaty is the supreme
law of the land.
908 Ignotus [pseud.'] Is the United States a world power?
North American review, Dec. 7, 1906, v. 183: 1107-1119.
AP2.N7.V.183
909 Ion, Theodore P. The Japanese school incident at San Fran-
cisco from the point of view of international and con-
stitutional law.
Michigan law review, Mar. 1907, v. 6: 326-31$.
910 Lewis, William Draper. Can the United States by treaty con-
fer on Japanese residents in California the right to at-
tend the public schools?
American law register, Feb. 1907, v. 55:75-90.
Footnote references to eases.
" If these conclusions are correct, our Federal Government has
under the Constitution power to make a treaty with Japan
or any other foreign nation giving to the subjects or citizens
oJ the foreign nation residing in one of the States the
right to attend the public schools of the State on the
same terms as native or naturalized citizens. In the Con-
stitution itself we find nothing to restrain the President
from negotiating, and two thirds of the Senate from ratify-
ing such a treaty." p. 88.
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 191
911 Miller, Shackleford. [Address on the treaty-making power,
before the Jefferson school of law.]
Congressional record, 59th Cong. 2d sess., v. J/J, pt. 2: 1519-
1522. Jll.R5,v.41,pt.2
Asks the question whether the President and Senate can con-
stitutionally make a treaty with Japan that will confer the
right on Japanese citizens of California to have themselves
and their children educated in the public schools at the pub-
lic expense, and answers the question in the negative.
912 Robbins, A. H. A cloud upon the horizon which threatens our
dual form of government.
Central law journal, Feb. 12, 1909, v. 68: 115-117.
Editorial comment on the controversy between the President
of the U. S. and California legislature.
913 Root, Elihu. The real question under the Japanese treaty and
the San Francisco school board resolution.
American journal of international law, Apr. 1907, v. 1:
273-286.
Address before the first annual meeting of the American so-
ciety of international law.
" The treaty-making power is not distributed ; it is all vested
in the national government ; no part of it is vested in or
reserved to the states. In international affairs there are no
states ; there is but one nation, . . ." p. 278.
M The great question which overshadowed all discussion of the
treaty of 1894 was the question : Are the people of the
United States about to break friendship with the people of
Japan? That question, I believe, has been happily an-
swered in the negative." p. 286.
914 Sherley, Swagar. The treaty-making power. Speech in the
House of representatives, Jan. 22, 1907.
Congressional record, 59th Cong., 2d sess., v. Jf.1, pt. 2: 1515-
1522. Jll.R5,v.41,pt.2
Discusses first, violations of treaty-rights of aliens, and, then
the extent of the treaty-making power. Holds that " the
reserved powers of the states are a limitation upon the
treaty-making power."
Appended is the address of Judge Shackleford Miller.
1897— GREAT BRITAIN
915 Andre, Alexandre. Le traite anglo-americain d'arbitrage de
1897.
Revue generale de droit international public, Nov.-Dec.
1911, v. 18: 654-666. JX3.B56,v.l8
192 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
916 U. S. Treaties, etc., 1893 1897 {CI veland) . . . Arbitration
with Great Britain. Message from the President . . .
transmitting a treaty between the United States and Great
Britain for the arbitration of matters in difference be-
tween the two countries, signed al Washington, January
11, L897.
[Washington, Gov't 'print, off., 1905] 33 p. 23 cm . (58th
Cong., 3d sess. Senate. Doc. 161)
At head of title: Confidential— Executive D— Fifty-fourth Con-
gress, second session.
Signed: Richard oiney. Julian I'aunceforte [ !]
Injunction of secrecy removed and ordered printed February
l I. 1905.
Extracts from the Executive journal of the Senate, February
8-May 5, 1897: p. S-33.
6-12239
1897— HAWAIIAN ISLANDS
917 Changing* the Constitution.
Nation, July 31, 1898, v. 67: ',',. AP2.N2,v.67
With regard to the annexation of Hawaii by joint resolution.
"With the Change now made in the Constitution it will re-
quire only a bare majority in both Houses of Congress to
annex territory in any part of the world."
918 Cooley, Thomas M. Grave obstacles to Hawaiian annexation.
Forum. June, 1893, v. 15: 389-4.06. AP2.F6,v.i5
919 Schouler, James. Mr. Cleveland and the Senate.
Forum, Mar., 1897, v. 23: 65-74.. AP2.F6,v.23
"The Hawaiian conquest," p. (39.
1901— GREAT BRITAIN (HAY-PAUNCEFOTE TREATY)
920 Anderson, Chandler Parsons. Panama canal tolls. An ad-
dress on the issues between the United States and Great
Britain in regard to Panama canal tolls, as raised in the
recent diplomatic correspondence.
Washington | Govt, print, off.] 1913. 11 p. 23\ cm . (\TJ. S.]
63d Gong., Ut * 88. Senate Doc. 32)
13 35372 HE537.9.T7A7
921 Baty, Thomas. The Panama tolls.
Law magazine and review, Nov. 1912, v. 38: 91-96.
922 Panama tolls question.
Law magazine and review, Mar. 1914, v. 23: 389-396.
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 193
923 Cox-Sinclair, E. S. The international status of the Panama
canal.
Law magazine and review, Nov. 1912, v. 38: 1-15.
924 Davis, George W. Fortification at Panama.
American journal of international law, Oct. 1909, v. 3: 885-
908. JXl.A6,v.3
A reply to Hains's article in the April number, opposed to
fortification. Proves by extracts from the Clayton-Bulwer
treaty, presidential messages, etc., that the United States
has the right to fortify the canal.
925 Dunn, Russell L. The Panama canal toll and the constitution.
Case and comment, May, 1914, v> 20:261-273.
926 Dykes, D. O. The Panama canal and treaty rights.
Juridical review, Jan. 1913, v. 24: 261-273.
927 Elliott, C. B. A review of the Panama canal tolls controversy.
Minnesota state bar association. Proceedings, 1914. P- 110-
124.
928 Escobar, Francisco. President Roosevelt's message and the
canal.
North American review, Jan. 1904, v. 178: 122-132.
Discusses the treaty-making power and the international law
of recognition.
AP2.N7,v.l78
929 Grahame, Leopold. The canal diplomacy. Justification for
the British protest.
North American review, Jan., 1913, v. 197 : 31-39.
AP2.N7,v.l97
930 Green, John B. The Panama canal. Trade, treaties and tolls.
Case and comment, Nov., 1913, v. 20: 402-406.
931 Hains, Peter C. Neutralization of the Panama canal.
American journal of international law, Apr., 1909, v. 3:
354-394. JXl.A6,v.3
" There can be no doubt that the Hay-Pauncefote treaty was
made with a view of neutralizing the canal ; if it fails to ac-
complish this purpose there is still time to correct its de-
fects . . . But it is confidently claimed that the treaty does
neutralize the canal . . . and that the construction of forti-
fications commanding the approaches thereto will destroy
neutralization."
137190°— 20 13
194 LIBEARY OF CONGRESS
932 Kennedy, Crammond. The canal fortifications and the treaty.
American journal of international law, July, 1911, r 5:
020-638. jxi.A6,v.5
In favor of neutralization of the canal.
933 Neutralization and equal terms.
American 'journal of international law, Jan., 1913, v. 7:
&7-50. JXl.A6,v.7
" Tlie United States, having freed itself by the Hay-Paunce-
fote treaty from certain requirements of the Clayton-Buhver
treaty . . . should see to it that the general principles of
neutralization and equal terms, expressly preserved, re-
affirmed and reconsecrated as they are in the treaty now in
force, shall suffer no impairment in the administration of
this self-assumed trust for mankind."
934 Latane, John H. The neutralization features of the Hay-
Pauncefote treaty.
American historical association. Report, 1902, v. 1, p. 289-
303. E172.A60 1902,v.l
A discussion of the general principles involved in term " neu-
tralization."
935 The Panama canal act and the British protest.
American journal of international law, Jan., 1913, v. 7:
17-26. JXl.A6,v.7
Treats of the effect of the Hay-Pa uncefote treaty on Great
Britain's claim for free use of the canal.
936 McGrath, P. T. The Bond-Hay treaty. A new phase of the
Anglo- American dispute.
Nineteenth century and after, June, 1903, v. 53: 924-935.
AP4.N7,v.53
937 Olney, Richard. Canal tolls legislation and the Hay-Paunce-
fote treaty.
Laicyer and banker, June, 1913, v. 6: 164-171.
938 Panama canal tolls and the Hay-Pauncefote treaty.
An address on Panama canal tolls legislation and the
Hay-Pauncefote treaty, read before the American society
of international law.
"Washington \ Govt, print, off.'] 1913. 10 p. 23 cm . ([U. S.]
63d Cong., 1st scss. /Senate. Doc. 33)
13 35378 HE537.9.T704
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 195
939 Oppenheim, Lassa Francis Lawrence. The Panama canal con-
flict between Great Britain and the United States of
America; a study.
Cambridge [Eng.~\ University press, 1913. 2 p. I., 57, [i] p.
19¥* 1 .
13-6704 HE537.9.T705
940 Panama canal act. Protest by the British government.
American reply.
Canada law times, Feb. 1913, v. 33:77-83.
941 Richards, Sir Henry Erie. The Panama canal controversy ; a
lecture delivered before the University of Oxford on
October 25, 1913.
Oxford, The Clarendon press; London, New York [etc.]
H. Milford, 1913. 48 p. 23 cm .
Appendix : a. Clayton-Bulwer treaty, 1850. — b. Hay-Paunce-
fote treaty, 1901. — c. Treaty between the United States and
Panama (Hay-Varilla) 1903.
14-5223 HE537.9.T7B5
941a Robbins, A. H. Exemption of Panama canal tolls as affect-
ing the Hay-Pauncefote treaty.
Central law journal, Feb. 20, 1914, v. 78:128-129.
942 Smith, George B. The Panama canal.
Illinois law review, June, 1912, v. 7 : 98-118.
943 Taylor, Hannis. Rule of treaty construction. An address on
the rule of treaty construction known as rebus sic stanti-
bus : a discussion of the Clayton-Bulwer and Hay-Paunce-
fote treaties in relation to the Panama canal.
Washington [Govt, print, of.] 1913. 8 p. 23 cm . ([U. S.]
63d Cong., 1st sess. Senate. Doc. 31)
13-35371 HE537.9.T7T3
944 Tower, Charlemagne. The treaty obligations of the United
States relating to the Panama canal.
American philosophical society. Proceedings, Apr. 1913, v.
52: 234-242. Qll.P5,v.52
" Treats historically our obligations in regard to the canal
as determined by the various treaties."
945 Essays political and historical.
Philadelphia and London, J. B. Lippincott company, 1914-
306 p. map. 21\ cm .
The treaty obligations of the United States relating to the
Panama canal, p. 38-53.
14-18488 JX1395.T6
196 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
946 Treaty rights in the Panama canal.
Law journal, July 20, 1912, v. 4,7: 458.
947 U. S. Dept. of state. Diplomatic history of the Panama canal.
Correspondence relating to the negotiation and applica-
tion of certain treaties on the subject of the construction
of an interoceanic canal, and accompanying papers.
Washington, Govt, print, of ., 19U. xii,602 p. 23\ cm . (63d
Cong.. 2d sess. Senate. Doc. 4?4)
Includes a report of the secretary of state, with papers rela-
tive to the construction of the Panama canal.
14-30413 JX1398.5.A5 1914
948 History of amendments proposed to the Clay-
ton-Bulwer treaty.
Washington, Govt, print, off., 1011. 31 p. 23\ cm . (61st
Cong., 3d sess. Senate. Doc. 71fi)
A brief history of the amendments proposed and considered
relative to the Clayton-Buhver treaty with Great Britain,
resulting in the treaty submitted December 14, 1901. Pre-
pared in the Department of state, and sent by Mr. Hay to
the Committee on foreign relations.
11-35109 TC773.TJ7 1911
949 Treaties, etc. Canal treaties. Executive documents pre-
sented to the United States Senate, together with pro-
ceedings by the Senate thereon relative to the Panama
canal.
Washington, Govt, print, off., 19 U. 84 p. 23 cm . (63d
Cong., 2d sess. Senate. Doc. 1)56)
Contents. — Clayton-Buhver treaty. — Hay-Pauncefote treaty. —
Senate proceedings on the treaty of 1900. — Treaty of 1901. —
Ratification of treaty of 1901. — Statement by Secretary
Hay. — Hay-Herran treaty (with Colombia) — Hay-Bunau-
Varilla treaty (with Panama)
14-30250 TC774.TJ6 1914
950 Interoceanic canal . . . the Clayton-Bulwer
treaty; the Hay-Pauncefote treaty, with amendments
thereto . . . and the treaty that was ratified on December
sixteenth, nineteen hundred and one, together with
amendments proposed thereto, and the votes.
{Washington, Govt, print, off., 1901] 17 p. 23 0m . (57th
Cong., 1st sess. Senate. Doc. 85)
TC773 U7 1901
[Washington, Govt, print, off., 1902] 25 p.
23 cm . (57th Cong., 1st sess. Senate. Doc. 85.
4-352-3 TC773.U7 1902
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 197
951 U. S. Treaties, etc. The Panama canal. Treaties and acts of
Congress relating to the Isthmian canal.
Washington [Govt, print, off.] 1911,. 55 p. 23 cm .
14-30249 TC774.U6 1914a
952 Treaties and acts of Congress relating to the
Isthmian canal. (Reprinted from the Annual report of
Isthmian canal commission, 1911)
Washington [Govt, print, off.] 1011. 1 p. I, p. 51,3-681.
%3\ cm .
11-35029 TC774.U6 191 Id
953 Treaties and acts of Congress relating to the
Panama canal, 1917.
Washington, Govt, print, of., 1917. 180, xxxviii p. 21,\ cm .
18-26036 TC774.TJ6 1917c
954 Wambaugh, Eugene. The right to fortify the Panama canal.
American journal of international law, July, 1911, v. 5:
615-619. jXl.A6,v.5
Concludes that the United States has the right to fortify the
canal.
955 White, Harold F. The legal aspects of the Panama canal.
Illinois law review, Feb. 1911,, v. 8: 1,1,2-1,61.
1902— CUBA
956 Cullom, Shelby M. The treaty-making power.
Congressional record, 57th Cong., 1st sess.. v. 35, Jan. 29,
1902, p. 1104-1111. Jll.R5,v.35
957 Trade relations with Cuba. [Speech in the Senate of
the United States. Dec. 7. 1903.]
Congressional record, 58th Cong., 2d sess. v. 38, part 1,
Dec. 7, 1903, p. 13-15. Jil.R5,v.38,pt.l
Constitutional discussion regarded as necessary since the
Senate has amended the Cuban treaty making it effective
only when approved by Congress. .
958 McCall, Samuel W. Cuban reciprocity. Speech in the House
of Representatives, Nov. 19, 1903.
Congressional record, 58th Cong., 1st sess., Nov. 19, 1903,
v. 37, p. 385-387. Jll.R5,v.37
Submits that " if we concede to the Senate the right to pass
legislation by treaty and the right to impose taxation by
treaty we will have surrendered the last vestige of popular
representative government in the United States."
198 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
959 Morgan, John T. [The Cuban treaty and the situation in the
Caribbean Sea. the Gulf of Mexico, and other coasts and
islands. Speech in the Senate of the United States, Dec. 9,
L903.]
Congn ssional n cord, 58th ( <>ng., 2d sess. v. 38, pt. 1, Dec.
9, 1903, p. 72-82. jii.B5,v.38,pt.i
Points out " some dangers ... in the assumption by the Presi-
denl of treaty-making powers without the consent of Con-
gress."
9G0 Morrell, Edward De V. [The Cuban treaty. Speech in the
House of Representatives, Nov. IT, 1903.]
Congressional record, 58th Cong., 1st sess. v. 37, Nov. 17,
1903, p. 309-310. Jii.R5,v.37
"All measures affecting the revenue must emanate in the
House of Representatives."
961 Teller, Henry M. Trade relations with Cuba. Speech in the
Senate of the United States, Tuesday and Wednesday,
Dec. 8 and 0. 1003.
Congressional record, 58th Cong., 2d sess. v. 38, pt. 1, Dec.
8 and 9, 1903, /> 37-46, 07-72. jn.R5,v.38,pt.l
Includes an affirmation of the power of the House of Repre-
sentatives to originate revenue hills, and continues with a
discussion of the merits of the treaty.
962 U. S. Congress. House. Committee on ways and means. Re-
port from the committee on ways and means, to whom was
referred the bill (H. R. 1921) to carry into effect a con-
vention between the United States and the republic of
Cuba, signed on the 11th day of December, in the year
1902.
[Washington, 1003.] 4, 3 p. 23 cm . {58th Cong., 1st sess.
House. Report. 1.) Serial no. 4577
963 Senate. Committee on foreign relations. Jurisdiction
of the Senate to act upon reciprocity treaties. Report.
Dec. 15, 1902.
[Washington. 1902.] 3 p. 23 cm . (57th Cong., 2d sess.
Senate. Doc. 47.) Serial no. 4420
964 Williams, John S. Cuban reciprocity. Speech in the House
of Representatives. Nov. 19,1903.
Congressional record, 58th Congress, 1st session, v. 37, Nov.
10, 1003, p. 380-385.
Includes discussion of the constitutionality of the Cuhan
treaty. Jll.R5,v.37
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 199
1911— JAPAN
965 American journal of international law. Editorial. The
American-Japanese discussions relating to the land tenure
law pi California.
American jowvial of international law, July, 191 4, v. 8:
571-578. JXl.A6,v.8
966 New Japanese treaty of commerce and navigation.
American journal of international law, Apr., 1911, v. 5: 44®-
44S. JX1.A6.V.5
967 Anti-alien legislation in California. Statements and messages
by Gov. Hiram W. Johnson. Comment on California's
attitude by eastern investigators.
[San Jose, Col,, 1913?} 18 p. 24 cm .
Contents. — Land law enacted by Legislature. — State within
its rights. — What of dignity of California? — Governor John-
son's answer to Secretary of state Bryan. — California's side
of it [by E. Hungerford, in " Harper's weekly " of June 7,
1913]— Japan in California [by P. C. Macfarlane, in "Col-
lier's " of June 7, 1913]
14-31130 JV6888.C2A7
968 Boyd, James H. Treaty-making power of the United States
and alien land laws in states.
California law review, M ay, 1918, v. 6: 279-294.
969 Butte, George Charles Felix. Die kalifornische Landerwerb-
frage.
Miinchen und Leipzig, Duncker & Humblot \1913?~\ cover-
title, p. [171]-186. 23™.
" Sonderabdruck (nicht im Buchhandel) aus Jahrbuch des
Volkerrechts. [11. 2] "
14-22259 JV6888.B8
970 California. Laws, statutes, etc. An act relating to the rights,
powers and disabilities of aliens and of certain companies,
associations and corporations with respect to property in
this state, providing for escheats in certain cases, pre-
scribing the procedure therein, and repealing all acts or
parts of acts inconsistent or in conflict herewith. < Ap-
proved May 19, 1913. >
{Sacramento f 1913] 2 p. 22\™.
13-13634 JX6570.U7C2 1913
200 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
971 Collins, Charles Wallace. Will the California alien land law
stand the tost of the Fourteenth amendment?
Yale law journal. Feb. 1914, v. 23: 830-338.
"The California law will in all probability be declared void,
because to uphold it would limit the protection of the
Fourteenth Amendment to citizens and to those eligible to
citizenship."
972 Dilla, Harriette M. The constitutional background of the
recent Japanese anti-alien land bill controversy.
Michigan law review, May, 1914, v. 12:573-684-.
973 Gadsby, John. The Japanese law relating to foreigners' right
of ownership of land.
Law quarterly review, Jan. 1914, v. 30: 91-96.
974 Kawakami, Kiyoshi Karl, ed. The Japanese question, a sym-
posium.
San Francisco, Gal., The Japanese- American news [n. d.~\
cover-title, 1 I., 53 p. 23 cm .
Contents. — 1. Introductory remarks, by K. K. Kawakami. —
2. Eye to eye, by B. I. Wheeler. — 3. Japan and the United
Stales, by R. L. Wilbur. — 4. The Japanese question in
America, by W. Macarthur. — 5. California and the Japan-
ese, by G. M. Stratton. — 6. The United States and Japan.
by J. W. Mullen. — 7. What the West might learn from
Japan, by G. Kennan. — 8. America and Japan — War or
peace, by J. Jones. — 9. The Japanese question in America,
by C. K. McClatchy. — 10. Treaty obligations, by Hon. E.
Root.— 11. Lest we forget, by J. Foord— 12. The Pacific
coast peril, by F. B. Loomis. — 13. The Japanese question in
the United States, by W. T. Bonsor. — 14. America and race
problem, by Rev. C. F. Aked.
A 16-417 DS849.U6K3
975 Mahon, J. The Japanese question.
American law review, Sept. 1914, v- 48: 698-713.
976 The new treaty of commerce and navigation [Japanese].
American journal of international law, Apr. 1911, v. 5: 442-
448. JXl.A6,v.5
977 Scherer, James Augustin Brown. The Japanese crisis.
New Fork, Frederick A. Stokes company [ c 1916] 5 p. I.,
3 148 p. 19$ cm .
Contents. Entroduction. — California and the opening of
Japan. The coming Of the Japanese to California. — Is Japan
militant? — Are the Japanese assimilable? — Is agricultural
competition safe? — The alien land law. — Appendices: Trans-
lation of the Japanese land law. Text of the California
land law. The American-Japanese treaty of 1911. An
argument for nondiscrimination.
16-91 MJ E183.8.J3S3
CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 201
978 Sisson, Thomas U. [Alien ownership of land in the United
States]. Speech in the House, Apr. 28, 1913.
Congressional record, 63d Cong. 1st sess., v. 50, pt. 1: 632-
640. Jll.R5,v.50,pt.l
979 Treaty-making power of the federal government.
Speech in the House, May 23, 1913.
Congressional record, 63d Cong., 1st sess-, v. 50, pt. 2:
1712-1721. Jll.R5,v.50,pt.2
1912— ARBITRATION TREATIES
980 American journal of international law. Editorial. The
American theory of international arbitration.
American journal of international law, Apr. 1908, v. 2:
387-391. JXl.A6,v.2
981 The Bryan peace treaties.
American journal of international law, Oct. 1913, v. 7:
823-829. JXl.A6,v.7
982 The effect of Mr. Bryan's peace treaties upon the rela-
tions of the United States with the nations at war.
American journal of international law, Apr. 1915, v. 9:
P4-496. JXl.A6,v.9
" The treaties signed with France, Great Britain, and Russia
should prevent war over any disputes that might arise be-
tween the United States and any one or all of the allied
powers."
983 New general arbitration treaty with Great Britain.
American journal of international law, Apr. 1911, v. 5:
451-459. JXl.A6,v.5
984 The pending treaty of arbitration between the United
States and Great Britain.
American journal of international law, Jan. 1912, v. 6:
167-177. JXl.A6,v.6
On the differences arising between the Executive and the
Senate on the treaty-making power.
985 Recent arbitration treaties concluded by the United
States.
American journal of international law, July, 1908, v. 2:
624-630. JX1.A6.V.2
202 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
980 American journal of international law. Secretary Bryan's
peace plan.
American journal of international law, July, 1914, v. 8:
565 571. jxi.A6,v.8
Contains a list of countries which have entered into treaties;
July 24, 193 I.
^S7 Treaties of arbitration with Great Britain and France.
A merican journal of international law, Apr. 1912, v. 6:
460-463. JX1.A6.V.6
988 Andre, Alexandre. Le Senat americain et les traites d'arbi-
trage avec la Fiance et La Grande-Bretagne du3aout 1911.
Revue generale de droit international ■public, May-June,
1912, v. 19: 350-355. JX3.R56,v.i9
Texte du traite, v. IS: 654-657.
989 Arbitration treaties and senatorial prerogatives.
Bench and bar, Nov. 1911, v. 27: 45-49.
990 Bacon, Augustus O. General arbitration treaties. Speech in
the Senate, Mar. 6, 1912.
Congressional record, 62d Cong. 2d seas., v. 48, pt. 3:
2865-2877. Jil.R5,v.48,pt.3
991 Senate amendments to the arbitration treaties.
North American review, May, 1912, v. 195: 673-686.
AP2.N7,v.l95
992 Balch, Thomas Willing. Etats-Unis d'Amerique. Differend
avec la Grande-Bretagne en ce qui concerne la question
des droits le canal de Panama . . .
Revue generale de droit international public, Nov. -Bee.
1913, v. 20: 747-750. JX3.R56,v.20
Letter also printed in The Sun, Dec. 2, 1913, p. 6.
993 Burton, Theodore E. Arbitration treaties. Speech in the
Senate, Feb. 6, 1912.
Congressional record, 62d Cong. 2d sess., v. 48, pt. 2: 1750-
/ ; 7 7
Jll.R5,v.48,pt.2
991 General arbitration treaties. Speech in the Senate,
Mar. 7, 1912.
Congressional record, 62d Cong. 2d sess. t v. 48, pt. 3:2950-
2952. Jll.R5,v.48,pt.3
CONSIDERATIONS IN" RESPECT TO SPECIAL TREATIES 203
995 Dennis, William Cullen. The arbitration treaties and the
Senate amendments.
American journal of international law, July, 1912, v. 6:
614-628. JXl.A6,v.6
Concludes ". . . that the value of these treaties lies in their
usefulness as models and in their inspirational power as
respects future treaties, ... it is submitted that to ratify
the treaties as amended would, on the whole, hinder rather
than help the cause of peace through justice."
996 Finch, George A. The Bryan peace treaties.
American journal of international law, Oct. 1916, v. 10:
882-890. JXi.A6,v.lo
A classification of the provisions of the peace treaties so far
ratified (19) showing the different forms used with respect
to the various countries.
The texts of the treaties are to be found in the Supplement to
the Oct. number of this magazine.
997 Hyde, Charles C. The general arbitration treaties.
North American review, Jan. 1912, v. 195: 1-1 4.
AP2.N7,v.l95
998 Lodge, Henry Cabot. General arbitration. Lecture delivered
... at the Naval war college extension, Washington,
D. C, February 13, 1913.
Washington, Govt, print, off., 1913. 12 p. 23 cm .
13-35138 JX1963.L5
999 The general arbitration treaties with Great Britain and
France. Speech in the Senate of the United States on
February 29, 1912.
Washington, Govt, print, off., 1912. 34 p. 23hj m . ([U. S.]
62d Cong., 2d sess. Senate. Doc. 353.)
"List of arbitration treaties and conventions submitted to and
acted upon by the Senate " : p. 30-34.
12-35349 JX1987.G7 1912
1000 Same. Speech in the Senate, Feb. 29, 1912.
Congressional record, 62d Cong. 2d sess., v. 48, pt. 3: 2596-
2607. Jll.R5,v.48,pt.3
List of arbitration treaties and conventions submitted to and
acted upon by the Senate : p. 2605-2607.
1001 Root, Elihu. Speech in the Senate, Mar. 7, 1912, on the general
arbitration treaties.
Congressional record, 62d Cong. 2d sess., v. 48, pt. 3:2934-
2940. Jll.R5,v.48,pt.3
204 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
1002 Scelle, Georges. Les traites generaux d'arbitrage des fitats-
Unis avec la France et l'Angleterre.
Questions diplomatique s et coloniales, Apr. 1, 1918, v. 33:
393-407. JX3.Q4,v.33
1003 Sherman, Gordon E. The permanent neutrality treaties.
Yali Uw journal. Jan. 1915, V. 24'. 217-241.
1001 Smith, Hoke. General arbitration treaties. Speech in the
Senate. Mar. 7, 1912.
Congressional record, (I'd (Jong. 2d sess., v. jft, pt. 3: 2944-
2950. Jll.R5,v.48,pt.3
1005 Tryon, James Libby. The advance made by treaties of arbi-
tral ion.
Yale law journal, Nov. 1914, v. 24: 56-64.
"Deals with the history and progress of arbitration and other
pacific methods of settling international disputes, from the
standpoint of American experience.
100G U. S. Treaties, etc., 1913- (Wilson) General peace
treaties of 1914 all ratified and made public.
Washington, Govt, print off., 1915. [114] p. 23 cm .
Made up of twenty-eight pamphlets in the doc. series: 63d
Cong., 2d sess. Confidential. Executive, all having the
title: "Advancement of the cause of general peace; ... Mes-
sage from the President of the United States transmitting
a treaty" ... and including, respectively, the text of treaties
with Norway. Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua,
Netherlands, Bolivia, Persia, Portugal, Costa Rica, Switzer-
land, Venezuela, Denmark, Italy, Uruguay, Argentina, Brazil,
Chile, Peru, China, France, Great Britain, Spain, Russia,
Ecuador, Greece, Paraguay, and Sweden.
15-26571 JX1987.A4 1914c
1007 Usher, Roland G. The significance of the arbitration treaties.
Atlantic monthly, Apr. 1912, v. 109: 447-456. AP2.A8,v.i09
1008 Wickersham, George W. Our compulsory arbitration trea-
ties should be amend* d.
American academy of political and social science. Annals,
-lain 1917, v. 72:200-207. Hl.A4,v.72
1009 Williams, .John Sharp. General arbitration treaties. Speech
in the Senate. Mar. ."">. L912.
Congressional record, 62d Cong. %d sess., v. 48, pt. 3: 28%-
2833 ■ Jll.R5,v.48,pt.3
1010 Works, John D. Speech in the Senate, Feb. 8, 191'2, on the
genera] arbitral inn t reaties.
Congressional record, 62d Cong. 2d sess., v. 48, pt. 2: 1834-
18J '' Jll.R5,v.48,pt.2
AUTHOE INDEX
[The numbers refer to the items, not to the pages.]
Abbott, Lyman 253
Abby, J. T 68
Adams, Charles Francis 470, 581
Adams, Henry 313, 653
Adams, John 581
Adams, John Quincy, pres. U. S- 254,
744
Aked, C. F 974
Albin, Pierre 1
Aldrieh, Nelson W 893
Alger, George W 255
Allen, William 744
American Jewish year book 753, 754
American journal of interna-
tional law 897,965,966,980-987
American remembrancer 582
Ames, Fisher 583-587, 638
Ames, Herman V 525
Ammen, Admiral 810
Amos, Sheldon 83, 193
Anderson, Chandler P ___ 257, 718, 920
Andre, Alexandre 915,988
Anson, Sir William R 194
Antoine, Ch. F 35
Anzilotti, Dionisio 2-4
Appert, G 5
Archer, William S 744
Atlay, J. Beresford 183
B 572
Bache, B. F 638
Bacon, Arthur 195
Bacon, Augustus O 259, 990, 991
Bagehot, Walter 196
Baker, Andrew J 526
Baker, Sir George S. hart 6, 50
Balch, Thomas W 992
Baldwin, Simeon E 260, 899
Bancroft, George 472
Banks, Nathaniel P 872, 877, 881
Barbe-Marbois, Frangois, mar-
quis de 654
Barbeyrac, Jean 7
Barbour, James 688
Barbour, Philip P
Barclay, Sir Thomas
Barrett, James T
Barstow, Hollen M
688
8
261
900
Barthelemy, Joseph 214
Bascom, John 262
Basdevant, Jules 132a, 132b
Baty, Thomas 921,922
Bayard, James A 733
Bayard, James A., 2d 570
Bayly, T. H 862
Beardsley, Samuel 744
Bell, John 794
Bellot, H. H. L 263
Benjamin, J. P 733
Bennett, Edmund H 548
Benton, Thomas H 569,
673, 687, 778, 779, 862
Bergbohm, Carl 9,85
Bergh, Albert E 340
Bergson, Jules 52
Bernard, Mountague 10
Bigelow, John 264,795
Bigelow, Melville M 552,577
Bikle, Henry W 265
Binney, Horace 744
Bird, C. B 266
Blackstone, Sir William 197
Blaine, James G 873
Blair, Austin 872
Blount, Thomas 63S
Bluntschli, Johann K 11,12
Bocock, T. S 862
Boeck, Ch. de 29
Bohm, Leopold, graf von 143
Bonfils, Henry J. F. X 13
Bonsor, W. T 974
Bonucci 14
Borchard, Edwin M 36
Borchardt, Felix 15
Borden, R. L 273
Bouldin, T. T 744
Bourgeois, Ferdinand 198
205
206
AUTHOR INDEX
Bourne, E. G 495
Boutell, Henry S G91. 692
B< in well, George S 527
Boyce, William W SG2
Boyd, James H 207,968
Boyer, B. M 872
Brant, R. W 54a
Breckenridge, John 658
Brodhead, Richard 733
Broomall, John M 872
Bryan, Henry L 449
Bryant, Edwin E 528
Bryee, James, viscount 529
Buonamici, Francesco 16
Burges, T 744
Burgess, John W 199,268
Burr, Charles II 269
Burton, Theodore E 993,994
Butler, Charles Henry 200,
270, 271, 473, 490, 491
Butler. Pierce 588
Butte, Georg C. F 969
Cadwalader, John L 272,440,454
Cains. See <'arey, Mathew.
Calhoun, John C 530,
680, OSS, 767, 770, 783
California. Laics, statutes, etc- 970
Callahan, James M 693,694
< 'a Inline, Alphonse de 17
Calvo, Carlos IS
Calwer, Richard 19
Cambreleng, C. C 744
Camillus [pseud.] See Hamil-
ton, Alexander.
Campbell, A. C 48
Campbell, George W 688
Canada. 1)< pt. of external af-
fairs 273
Capelle, Leon 132b
Carey, Mathew 582
Cass, Lewis 733
Cato [pseud.] See Livington,
R. R.
Cat i,. 11. .\. McK 20
Cavalcanti, Amaro 201
Cavarretta, Giuseppe 21
Chambrun, Charles A. de P.
marquis de 274,275
Chambrun, Pierre de 275
Charles, Garfield 457
Chilton, Thomas 744
Chltty, Joseph 167
Choate, Rufus 772, 77::
Claiborne, N. H 744
Clancy, Charles S 276
Clay, Henry 726,746,780
Clayton, A. S 744
Clayton, J. C 277
Clayton, John M 733, 796, 797, 821
Clingman, Thomas L 798
Clunet, Edouard 202
Cobbett, Pitt 22
Cobbett, William 589-591
Cocke, William 658
Cockes, William A 278
Coleman, William C 279
Collamer, Jacob 437,733
Collins, Charles W 971
Comegys, Joseph P 799
Conway, Eustace 23
Conway, Moncure D 592
Cooley, Thomas Mel 659,918
Corwln, Edward S 2S0-283, 531
Coudert, Frederic R 24
Coulter, R 744
Courtney, L. H. C. 1st baron 203
Cox, Homersham 204,205
Cox-Sinclair, E. S 923
Coxe, Brinton 532
Craik, Sir Henry 233
Cralle, Richard K 530
Crandall, Samuel B 25,206,
207, 284, 285, 474
Crapo 810
Creasy, Sir Edward S 26
Crittenden, John J 733
Croswell, Simon G 286
Cullom, Shelby M 287,
765, 872, 956, 957
Currey, John 288
Curtis, George T 533
Gushing, Caleb 289, 729
Cuthbert, Alfred 688
D., A. J 290
Dahlgren, Madeleine V 274
Dallas, Alexander J 593-595
Dallas, George Mifllin 208
Dana, Samuel W 570,655
Dauzat, Albert 27,209
Davis, Agnes M 864
Davis, Garrett 704
Davis, George B 28
Davis, George W 924
Davis, J. C. Bancroft 291-
293, 453, 455
Dawson, Henry B 804
AUTHOR INDEX
207
Day, Clive 446
Dayton, Jonathan 658
Delawarean, pseud. See Co-
megys, J. P.
Demombynes, Gabriel 210
Dennis, William G 995
Depew, Chauncey M 565
Deseamps, E. E. F. baron— 132a, 132b
Despagnet, F. C. R 29
De Sumichrast 242
Devlin, Robert T 294
Dickey, Francis W 30
Dietrich, Charles H 893
Dilla, Harriette M 972
Dillon, John M 371
Dodcl, Walter F 211
Donati, Donato 31
Douglas, Stephen A 800
Drucquer, M. N 50
Du Bouzet, Ch 32
Duer, William A 534, 535
Dunn, Russell L 925
Dupriez, Leon 212, 213
Duwalt, G. W 296
Dykes, D. O 926
E 297
Eads, James B 810
Easton, Rufus 688
Edmond, William 570
Edwards, P. L 660
Egert, B. P 755
Eliot, Edward C 298
Elliot, James 657
Elliot, Jonathan 299,
300, 492, 501, 596, 661, 681
Elliott, Charles B 301,927
Ellsworth, Oliver 493,494,597
Erich, Rafael 33
Escobar, Francisco 928
Esmein, Adhemar 214
Evarts, William M 302
Everett, Edward 740, 744, 801
Ewald, Alexander C 215
Fairlie, John A 303
Falconer, Wm. A 495
Farra, R. A 34
Farrand, Max 518
Farrar, Timothy 526
Farwell, Nathan A 704
Fauchille, Paul 132b
Federalist 304-306, 495
Fenwick, C. G 166
Ferris, Orange 872
Fessenden, W. P 733
Field, David D 781
Finch, George A 996
Fiore, Pasquale 35, 36
Fish, Carl R 37, 307
Fisk, George M 38, 768
Fleming, William H 308
Flood, E. C 309
Foley, John P 341, 612
Foord, J 974
Foot, S 733
Ford, Paul Leicester 305,
338, 495, 575, 611, 644, 663
Ford, Worthington C 580,640
Forsyth, John 688,690
Fort, John F 310, 901
Foster, David J 763,902
Foster, John W 39, 311, 312, 695, 706
Foulke, Roland R 40
Franklin, pseud 589, 598
Fromentin, Eligius 688
Fulton, C. W 903
Furber, George P 434
Gadsby, John 973
Gallatin, Albert 313,
570, 599-602, 638, 782
Gaston, William 688
Geffcken, F. H 41, 52
Gholson, Thomas, jr 688
Gibbs, George 603
Giddings, Joshua R 862
Gilbert, George E 904
Giles, William B 604, 638
Gilpin, Henry D 368, 502
Glenn, Edwin F 43
Glier, L 44
Gneist, Rudolf von 216
Goddard, Calvin 655, 656
Gold, Thomas R 688
Goodhue, Benjamin 571
Gordon, William 570
Gorius, Fr 217
Gould, John M 541
Grahame, Leopold 929
Graydon, William 314
Gt. Brit. Foreign office 45, 218
Treaties, etc 605
Green, John B 930
Gregory, Charles N 120, 316
Griffith, AVilliam 46
Griswold, Roger 606,
655, 656, 657, 666
Grotius, Hugo 47, 48
208
AUTHOR INDEX
Gulick, S. L 317
H., S. R 318
Bains, Peter C 924,931
Hale, J. P 733
Hall, J. P 319
Hall, William E 49
Halleck, Henry W 50
Hamilton, Alexander 304-306. 320-
323, 495, 496, 497, 582, 607, 60S
Hamilton, Alexander 324
Hanson, Alexander C 688
Hardin. Benjamin 6SS, 744
Hare, John I. C 537
Harris, George W 365
Harrison, Benjamin, pres. U. S__ 538
Hart, Albert I? 328,539
Hartmann, Adolf 51
Haswell, John II 455
Haven. Solomon G 862
Hayden, R 325
Hayes, Everis A 905
Hazeltine, .Mayo W 906
Heffter, August W 52
Helvidius \ pseud.] See Madi-
son, James.
Henriques, H. S. Q 756
Hepp, Francois - r >''>
Herbette, Maurice 1
Herod, Joseph R 54
Hershey, Amos S 720
Hertslet, Sir Edward 54a, 54b, 219
Hewitt, Abram S 894
Higby, William 872
Higgins, A. P 49
Hill, David Jayne 48,326,327
Hill, Mabel 328
Hod-ins, Thomas 243,719,720
Holland, Thomas E 55
Hollins. Capt 827
Holls, Frederick W 56
Holmes, O. W., jr 541
Hoist. Hermann E. VOn___ 329,540,783
Holtzendorff, F. J. W. P. von 57
Hopf, Jules 92,93
Hopkinson, Joseph 688
Hornbeck, Stanley K 53,58,446
Hosack, John 59
Howe, Timothy O 437
Huger, Benjamin 655, OSS
Hungerford, E 907
Hum. i iharles H 609
Hunt, Gaillard 330,370,517
Hunt, Harry E 696
Hyde, Charles Cheney 60,
331-333, 907, 997
Idman, K. G 61
Ignotus [pseud.] 908
Imberg, Kurt E 334
[ngraham, Edward D 167
Institute of international law 62
Ion, Theodore P 63,909
Iredell, James 498
Jackson, George 658
Jackson, Mrs. Helen M. F. Hunt- 573
Jacomet, Robert 64
Jameson, J. F 508
Jay, John 304-300,335,336,495
Jefferson, Thomas, pres. U. S_— 337-
342, 574, 575, 610-612,
643, 644, 662-664, 666
Jellinek, Georg 65
Jenks, Edward 230
Jerez,- Maximo 810
Jeze, Gaston 343,495
Johnson, Hiram W 967
Johnson, James A 872
Johnson, Reverdy 704
Johnson, R. W 733
Johnson, Richard M 744
Johnston, Henry P 335
Johnston, Richard H 340
Jones, Frangois S 344
Jones, G. W 733
Jones, J 974
Jones, J. Glancy 862
K., I. L 769
Kappler, Charles J 445
Kasson, John A 345, 346
Kaufmann, Erich 67
Kawakami, K. K 974
Keasbey, Lindley M 802-804
Keith, Arthur B 244-246
Kelley, William I) 882
Kellogg. Frank P. 347
Kennan, J 974
Kennedy, Crammond 932,933
Kent, James 68,541
King, Charles R 613
Ki.,_. Rufus 613, 6S8,689
Kittera, John W 570
Kliiber, Jobann L 69
Kohler, Josef 14
Kouomanoudi, Constantin 70
Kubn. Arthur K 348, 758
Laband, Paul 220
Laghi, Ferdinando 71
AUTHOR INDEX
209
Lantsheere, de 213
Lapradelle, Albert de 166, 221
Lardy, C 11
Latane, John H 934, 935
Lawrence, Abbott 822
Lawrence, Thomas' J 73, 74
Lawrence, William 349
Lawrence, William Beach_ 350, 654, 770
Leake, Walter 351
Lee, Arthur 481
Lee, Charles 614, 615
Lee, Richard Henry 499, 500
Lee, Sidney 222
Lehr, Ernest 75
Leo, Alfred 84
Leoni, A 76
Levermore, Charles H 697
Levi, Leone 77
Lewis, William D 197, 352, 910
Lincoln, Enoch 353
Lipscomb, Andrew A 340
Liszt, Franz von 78
Littlefield, Charles E 354
Livingston, Edward 609. 616, 638
Livingston, Robert R 582, 617
Lodge, Henry Cabot 306,
322, 355-357, 407, 495, 998-1000
Loomis, F. B 974
Lorimer, James 79
Loughbridge, Williamr___ 358, 872, 874
Love, James 744
Low, A. Maurice 359, 360, 378
Lowndes, William 688
Ludwig, Ernest 80
Lyman, Theodore 361,
566, 618, 645, 649, 665. 6S2
Lyon, Asa 6S8
Lyons, Lord 706, 707
McAdoo, William G 764
Macarthur, W 974
McCall, Samuel W 362, 958
McCarthy. Dennis 872
McClain, Emlin 542, 543
McClatchy, C. K 974
McDermott, Hugh F 730
Macdonnel, John 247
Macdonell, Sir John 81
Macfarland, H. B. F 363
Macfarlane, P. C 967
McGrath, P. T 721, 722. 936
McHenry, James 619
McKean, Thomas 564
Maclay, Edgar S 364
137190—20 14
Maclay, William 364, 365
McMaster, John B 507. 620, 666
Macon, Nathaniel 688
Madison, James, pres. V. S— 304-306,
320. 330, 366-370, 482, 501,
502, 517, 621, 622, 638, 650
Mahon, J 975
Maine, Sir H. J. S 82
Mallory, S. R 733
Malloy, William M 450, 457
Maney, George 849
Mann, James R 698
Manning. William O 83
Marcus [pseud.] See Iredell,
James.
Marshall, John 371,576,611,623
Marshall, Louis 759,764,765
Martens, F. F 84,85
Martens, Georg F. von S6-94
Mason, Alfred B 540
Mason, George 498,512
Mason, J. M 733
Massachusetts. Convention,
1788 503, 504
Maxey, Edwin 95
Maybury, W. C 894
Meier, Ernst 96, 373,
624, 667, 6S3, 741, 771, 875
Merignhac, Alexandre 97
Michon, Louis 223, 374
Mikell, William E 375
Mill, J. S 98
Miller, Samuel F 483, 544, 668
Miller, Shackelford 376,911
Mills, Elijah H 688
Millson, John S 862
Milovanovic, M 99. 99a
Mitchell, Samuel L 656, 657
Miyakawa, Masuji 377
Moody, William H 378
Moore, John Bassett 100,
271, 379-381, 805
Moore, S. McD 744
Moore, William H 224
Moran, Francis 467
Moreau, F. P. L 225
Morey, William C 382
Morgan, John T 383,959
Morine, Alfred B 723, 724
Morrell, Edward De V 960
Morrill, Justin S 384-386,
883, 884, 893
Morris, Gouveneur 671
210
AUTHOR INDEX
Morris, Heman W '*'> S T
Moser, Johann J 101
MUnch, Bans 102
Muhlenberg, Frederick A 625
Mullen, .1. VV 974
Mullins, James 872
Mungen, William 872
Munro, William B 495
Munroe, J. E. C L03
Murhard, Frederich W. A 90,91
Myers, Denys 1' 104, 105
Myers, Leonard s ~-
Nelson, Henry L 388,389
New York (State) Convention,
L788 505
Neyron, Peter J 106
Nicholas, John 570
Nicholas, Wilson C 658,669
Nicholson, Joseph II 656,657
Nippold, Otfried i<>7
Noailles, Jules C. V. due de 545
Nys, Ernest 108, L09
Ogden, Rollo 392, ::!>:{
Olivi, Luigi IK)
Olney, Richard 111,
806,916,937,938
Oncken, A 112
Onls, Luis de 727,728
Oppenheim, Lassa F. L__ 113, 114,939
Orth, G. S 872
Otis, Harrison G 570
Ottley, Henry 226
Paciflcus [pseud.] See Hamil-
ton, Alexander.
Paignon, Eug&ne 115
Paine, Robert T 394
Palmer, Truman G 893
Palmer, Walter B 446
Palmerston, Lord 822
Paschal, George W 546
Patterson, Christopher S 395,547
Patterson, William 506
Pauncefote, Julian 916
Pax [pseud.] See McDermott,
H. F.
Peckham, R. W 862
Penaud, Edouard 169-171
Pennsylvania. Historical so-
<-i<-tu 507
Peter Porcupine, pseud. See
Cobbett, William.
Peters, John A 872
Pflnum 110
Phelps, s. I 810
Philbert, V 117
Phillimore, G. G 118
Phillimore, Sir R. J. bart 119
Phillimore, Sir Walter G.F.oart_ 120
Phillips, P 862
Phillipson, Coleman 121,152
Pic, P 122
Pickens, F. W 744
Pickering, Timothy.- 020, 658, 606, 688
Pierce, Franklin 396
Pierre, Eugdne 227
Pinckney, Charles 508,582
Pinkney, William 084-686,688
Pitkin, Timothy 627
Pomeroy, John N 548
Ponsonby, A. A. W. H 123
Pradier-Foder€, Camille 125
Rradier-Fodeiv, P. L. E 12 4. 125
Prudhomme, A 126
Pruyn, J. V. S. L 872
Pufendorf, Samuel, freiherr
von 127-131
Purviance, Samuel D 657
Putney, Albert H 398
Quabbe, Georg 132
Ramsay, David 509
Randolph, Carman F 399
Randolph, Edmund— 510,592,628 630
Randolph, John 655,656,057,688
Rankin, Robert R 631
Raum, Green B 872
Rawle, William 549
Raynall, G. T. F 567
Reeder, Robert P 547
Reeves, Jesse S 792
Renault, Louis 132a-132b
Reynolds, James B 688
Rice. Allen T 810
Richard, Henry 133
Richards, Sir Henry E 941
Richardson, Hamilton P 511
Rivier, Alphonse P. O 134
Robbins, A. H 912,941a
Roberts, Jonathan 688
Robertson, David 523
Robertson, John 744
Robertson, Thomas B 688
Rol.Inet de Clery 229
Robinson, Chalfant__ 401.402,865,885
Rodney, Cresar A 657
Rogers, Henry W 403
Rolln-Jaequemyns, M. G 185
AUTHOR INDEX
211
Root, Elihu 913, 1001
Root, Erastus 688
Rowland, Kate M 512
Riittimann, Johann J 404
Ruyssenaers, L. H 132b
Salvioli, Gabrielle" 136
Saimver, Charles 93
Satow, Sir Ernest M 140
Saulsbury, Willard 704
Scala, Rudolf von 141
ScammeU, E. H 699
Scelle, Georges 1002
Sehenck, Robert C 872
Scherer, James A. B 977
Schley, William 744
Scbmalz, T. A. H 142, 143
Schmidt, Bruno 144
Schoen 145
Schouler, James 632,670,919
Schrault, Max von 146
Schuyler, Eugene 405, 731
Scott, E. H 516
Scott, James B 147
Sedgwick, Theodore 633, 63S, 784
Seligmann, Ernst 148
Sergeant, Thomas 550, 551
Sewall, Samuel 570
Seward, William H 706, 707, 733
Sheffey, Daniel 688
Shepheard, Wallyn P. B 149
Sherley, Swagar 914
Sherman, Gordon E 28,150,1003
Sherwood, H. L 54a
Sisson, Thomas U 978,979
Skelton, Oscar D 151,248
Smilie, John . 656
Smith, Sir Frederick E. bart 152
Smith, George B 942
Smith, Gerrit 861,862
Smith. Goldwin 249, 495
Smith, Hoke 1004
Smith, Samuel 570
Smith, William Alden 700
South Carolina. Constitution — 484
Spalding, Rufus P 872
Sparks, Jared ___ 441, 442, 579, 639, 671
Spear, Samuel T 408-411,513
Squier, Ephraim G 807
Stanford, Richard 688
Stephen, Henry J 230
Stevens, Tbaddeus 872
Stidham, Mrs. Clara H. Kerr 412
Stoerk, Felix 153
Stone, Frederick D 507
Story, Joseph 413,552,577,672
Stratton, G. M 974
Straus, Oscar S 764, 765
Stuart, C. E 733
Stuart-Linton, C. E. T 250
Sulzberger, Mayer 764, 765
Sulzer, William 761, 762, 764
Sumner, Charles 701,
704, 732, 733, 866, 876
Sutherland, George 553
Sutherland, J. B 744
Sutherland, William A 554
Tariff commission, London 154
Taylor, Hannis 155, 414, 943
Taylor, John 658, 6S8
Teller, Henry M 415, 961
Teubern, Ernest G. freiherr von_ 156
Thatcher, Samuel 657
Thayer, James B 555
Thomas, Philip F 886
Thompson 810
Thompson, B. M 416
Thompson, Joseph P 157
Thorpe, Francis N 556
Throop, Enos T 688
Tiffany, Joel 557
Todd, Alpheus 231, 232, 251
Toombs, R 733
Toucey, I 733
Tower, Charlemagne 944, 945
Traill, Henry D 233
Tracy, Uriah 658
Travis, Ira D 808
Trescot, William H 56S, 635, 646
Triepel, Heinrich 94, 160
Tryon, James L 1005
Tucker, Henry St. G 688
Tucker, Henry St. George 283,
422-424, 484a, 558, 559
Tucker, John Randolphs 559, 887, 896
Tucker, St. George 560
Tupper, Sir C. H 252
Twiss, Sir Travers 161, 235
Ullniann. Emanuel, ritter von_ 162
United States:
Bureau of rolls and library- 514
Bureau of statistics (Treas-
ury dept.) 425,426
Bureau of trade relations 163
Congress 569
636, 673, 687, 743, 785
1st Cong 578
212
AUTHOR INDEX
United States. Congress — Continued.
4th Cong 637,638,651,652
5th Cong 570,571
8th Cong—r 674, 675
14th Com,., 1st si ss 688, 689, 690
15th Cong., 1st sess 702
28d Cong., 2d s< <> 744
29th Cong 787
SSd Cong., 1st sess 8G2
.;;/// Cong t:;."»
88th Cong., tsi sess __ 703, s ''>7
88th com/., 2d sess— 437,704,868
.'/'ill! Cong., tst sess 888
46th Conn., 2d sess 438
47th Cong., 2d sess 891
House 427
Comm. on finance s '.t2
Com in. on foreign af-
fairs 128 131, 745,
762 764, 809 812, 869, 877
Select com. on the inter-
oceanic ship canal 813
Comm. on the ju-
diciary 432, S9G
Comm. on ways and
means— 433, SS9. 894, 962
Senate 236,
434, 4::'.), 647, 814, 893, 895
Comm. on finance S70
c<>, mil. on foreign illa-
tions 435,436,
725, 734, 740, 765, 772,
773. 786, 815-817, 963
Constitutional convention,
1787 515-521
Continental congress 485 488
Dcpt. of state 104, 237. 440-
444, 4S9, 676, 705-707, 735-737,
747-749, 818-853, S78, 947, 948
Laws, statutes, etc 445
Navy dcpt 708,854
President 709-714,
750, 7.11, 7<;<;. 855, 856, 857, SG3
St e also names of Presi-
dents.
Tariff commission 446, 117
7 / 1 asury dept 774
Tn aties, etc ._ 448 158, 677, 678,
793, 858. 859, 916, 949 953, L006
Usher, Roland (J 10117
Van Buren, Martin 7xs
Vattel, Emmerich de I0»i, 167
Verge, Ch 168
Veto, pseud. See Sedgwick,
Theodore.
Viallate, Achille 459
Vincent, Ren6 169-171
Viner, Jacob 446
Virginia. Convention, 1788__ 522,523
Visser, L. E 172
Vogels, Aloys 238
Vorhees, Daniel \V 893
Vosberg-Rekow, .Max 173,174
Wade, B. P 733
Walker, R. J 774
Walker. Robert J 789,790
Walker, Thomas A 175, L76
Walpole, Sir Spencer 232,239
Wambaugh, Eugene !>7>4
Washburn, Albert H 177
Washburn, Cadwalader C 872,877
Washburn, Israel 862
Washburne, Elihu B 872
Washington, Bushrod 576
Washington, George, pres. U. S- 579,
580, 623, 639, 640
Washington, II. A 337,
574, 610, 643, 662
Watkins, Tobias 727
Watmough, J. (J 744
Watson. David K 561
Waultrin. Rene 715
Wayne. J. M 744
Webb, William H 810
Webster, Daniel 461,738
Webster, Noah 7,1:4
Webster, Sidney 679
Webber- Hans 178.716
Weil. Bruno 179
Weller, J. B 733
Wells, William H 65S
Wells, William V 461a
West lake, John 180, 181
Wharton, Francis 182,
1 13. CIS, 77.2. 879
Wheaton, Henry 183,
770, 742, 777,. 777
Wheeler, B. I 974
Wheeler, Everett P 462
White, Harold F <).v,
W'hite, Samuel r,:,s
Whiting, William 5Q2
■Whitman, William 871
Whitney, Edward B 403
WickersLam, George W 1008
AUTHOR INDEX
213
Wicquefort, \braham van 184
Wilbur, R. L 974
Wild, Robert 717
Wilde, Richard H 688
Williams, John 638,641
Williams, John S 964, 1009
Williams, Mary W 860
W 7 illoughby, Westel W 563
Willson, Beckles 464
Wilson, Benjamin 811
W ilson, George G 64
Wilson, Henry 704
"\\ ilson, James 564
Wilson, W'oodrow, pres. U. S__ __ 465
Wolcott, Oliver 603, 642
Wolff, Christian, freAherr von_ 185-187
Woodburn, James A 466.467
Woodbury, Levi 791
Woolsey, Theodore D 188
Woolsey, Theodore S 188, 46S
Works, John D 1010
Wright, Quincy 1S9, 190
Wright, Robert 658, 688
Wurm, C. F 191,776
Wyse, Francis 469
Wythe, George 470,472,481
Yates, Robert 520
Yeaman, G. H 880
Zimmermann, Alfred 777
Zorn, Ph 240
SUBJECT INDEX
[The numbers refer to the items, not to the pages.]
In addition to the references given under certain items such as President,
Senate, etc., which relate to special articles only, the reader should also consult
the general treatises iu the sections on Treaty-making power in the United
Slates (items 253-364).
Abrogation of treaties :
See Termination of treaties; U. S.
Treaties: Denmark, 1826;
France. 1778; Gt. Brit.. 1817 ; Gt.
Brit., 1850; Gt. Brit., 1854; >t" s -
sia, 1832.
Agreements 12,
13, 18, 22, 39. 84, 85,
110, 140, 1G0, 167
U. S 261,
282,285,331,381,457
Alaska purchase 872-880
Algiers, Treaty, 0. S., 1795-.. 643-648
Alien land laws 296,
96o-979
Aliens, Rights of, and treaties— 95,
224,285,289,317,372,562
See also U. S. Treaties: Ja-
pan, 1894; Japan, 1911.
Alliances 33,
52, 57, 101, 113, 160,
107, 185-187, 221, 285
Bibliography 33
Anglo-American treaties 264
Bibliography 264
See also Clayton - Bulwer
treaty ; Panama c a n a 1
question ; ami F. s. Treat-
ies: Gt. Brit.
Annexation, Treaties of:
Se< Territory, Acquisition
or cession of, by t rent y.
Annulment of treaties :
St < Termination of | peal les.
Appropriation, Treaties Involv-
ing 285,
•111. Ill', r, it. <;:, | »;r,S, S61-863
Se< also i". s. Treaties:
franc, 1808; Mexico,
1858 : Russia. 2867.
214
Arbitration treaties 111, 178
Brazil 201
France 227
U. S 236,
253, 334, 354, 363, 379, 381,
394, 414, 457, 915, 916, 980-1010
List of 451
Austria-Hungary :
Commercial treaties. 219, 440, 4 17
Treaty-making power 206,
207, 210, 218, 223, s.u\
Baden 218
Balkan states 207
Bavaria 218
Belgium 206, 207.
210, 212, 213, 218, 223, 235, 237
Brazil :
Arbitration treaties 201
Treaty-making power 237.285
Bulgaria 210, 218
Canada :
Commercial treaties 446,4 17
Most-favored nation trea-
ties 151, 248
Treaties, United States 273
Treaty-making power 241-252
Cancellation of treaties:
.V' e Termination of treaties.
( Vntral American affairs :
See Clayton-Bulwer treaty.
Chile 207,237
Classication of treaties 12,97
Clayton -Bulwer treat y,
1850 73,794-860
Bibliography 795,808,860
• 'oast in:: trade 114
Colonies. Gt. Brit 241 252
Commercial treaties 32,38,
52, 78, 84, 85, 97, 112-114,
117. 146, 168, 17(1. 173, 174,
285, 286. 337. 368, 381, 405, 418,
446, 447, 461, 470, 480, 485, 498
SUBJECT INDEX
215
Commercial treaties — Continued.
Collection of, general 219
U. S 322, 323, 42.5-130, 457,
500, 507, 510, 537, 540, 544, 562
See also Most-favored nation
treaties ; Reciprocity trea-
ties.
Confederate states of America_ 200, 424
Confederation, 1774-1787, Trea-
ties and treaty-making power
under 322,323,470-489
Congress :
Duty to enforce treaties__ 285, 462
Legislation to give effect to
treaties 6, 285, 313
Power to abrogate treaties 415
Rights of, concerning
treaties 285,
329, 350, 387, 409, 411, 439
See also House of Repre-
sentatives ; Senate.
Constitution, Treaties subordi-
nate to 399
Constitutional aspects of treaty-
making power 6,
190, 257, 265, 268, 283, 285,
286, 287, 291, 292, 294, 310,
312, 326, 327, 345, 349, 354, 400,
411, 423, 468, 525-564, 582, 595
Consular officers, Rights under
treaties 24, 80, 285
" Convention," definition 285, 381
Conventions, U. S. Compilation
of 451-457
Copyright treaties 57, 285
Costa Rica 237, 285
Cuba :
Treaties, U. S. 1902 956-964
Treaty-making power 285
Danish Sound dues 729-738
Denmark 207, 210, 218, 236
Dependencies 285
See also Gt. Brit. Colonies.
Dissolution of treaties :
See Termination of treaties.
Effect of treaties 12, 31, 71, 97
See also War, Effect on
treaties.
Efficacy of treaties :
See Legal force and execu-
tion.
Enforcement of treaties 107, 165,
269, 282, 284, 285, 319, 333, 381
Execution of treaties 18,
28, 31, 33, 35, 36, 84, 85, 97, 224
See also Legal force and
execution.
Expiration of treaties :
See Termination of treaties.
Extradition treaties 176,
285, 294, 332, 380, 457, 469
Federal convention, i787, Treaty-
making power as considered
in 490-524
Federal courts, Jurisdiction of 285
Finland 210
Florida treaty, 1821 254,285
Forms of treaties 85, 107, 285
France :
Commercial treaties 446, 447
Most-favored-nation 446, 447
Ratification of treaties___ 140, 228
Treaty-making power 198, 199,
206, 207, 209, 210, 212,
214, 218, 221, 223, 225,
227, 229, 236, 237, 420
Treaties —
U. S. i778 470, 565-571
U. S. 1803 653-679
U. S. 1831— 350, 468, 739-752
Germany :
Most-favored-nation__ 44, 446, 447
Ratification of treaties___ 140, 228
Treaties 102, 240
U. S. 18M 386, 767-775
Treaty-making power 206,
207, 209, 210, 212, 217,
218, 220, 223, 236, 238
Great Britain :
Most-favored-nation 45,
75, 154, 446, 447
Ratification of treaties___ 140, 228
Treaties, Collections of 22a, 42
• See also Treaties, Col-
lections, General.
Commercial 219, 446, 447
Guaranty 103
U. S. 1794 581-642
U. S. 1815 680-690
U. S. 1817 691-717
U. S. 1818 718-725
U.S. 1850 (Clayton-Bul-
tver) 73, 794-860
U. S. 185k 864-871
U. S. 1897 915, 916
216
SUBJECT INDEX
Great Britain Continued.
Treaties, Collections of Con.
r. S. 1901 I Eay-Paunce-
fott ) 920 955, 992
Treaty-making power 22,192 194,
196, L97, 199, 200, 203-
210, 215, 216, 222-224,
226, 230 234, 236, 237
Great Britain, Colonies:
Ratification of treaties 228
Treaty-making power 241-252
Greal Lakes, Limitation of ar-
mament on 285, 691-717
Greece . - 207, 210, 218, 236, 237
Guaranty, Treaties of 41,
57, 61, 99, 99a, 103, L13, 132
Bibliography 61, L32
Guatemala 237, 285
Hawaiian Islands :
< lommercial treaties 285, 146, 447
Treaties —
r. S. 7875 881 893
r. s. t884 896
r. s. 1897 917-919
Hay-Pauncefote treaty— 920-955,992
Hesse-Darmstadt 218
II story of treaties 7, 47, 4S, 71,
127 131, 141, 166, 167, 184-187
Honduras 237, 285
House of Representatives and
treaty-making power 2nd,
285, 302, 322, 323, 329, 330, 337,
-. 366, i< il. 402, 412. 427-432,
436 138, 461a, 168, 500, 539, 540,
597, 599 602, 604, 606, 608-611,
613 616, 619, 62] 623, 625, 626,
633, 638 644, 654, 684 690, 726
Bibliography 402
ilso Appropriation, Trea-
ties involving ; U. S. Treat-
ties, Cuba, 1902; Ha-
waiian Is., 1875, t884;
Mexico, 1888.
Indian treaties 200,285,
364, 365, 371 381, U2, 417,
445, 471, 176, 478, 572 580
International agreements :
Agreements.
International arbil ration :
Set Arbitration, Interna-
tional.
Interoceanic canals :
Bulwer treaty ;
Panama canal question.
Interpretation of treaties 3. 5. 17.
iv. 22 28, 31, 33, 47, 48, 50, 60,
71, 73, 74, '.'7. 113, 122, 126, 166,
167, 17."), 185-187. 285, 294, 157
Bibliography 60, 122
Inviolability of treaties 71
Ireland 210
Isthmian canals :
S< < < !laj ton Bulwer treaty ;
Panama canal question.
Italy:
Commercial treaties . 219, 446,447
Ratification of treaties 22S
Treaty-making power 206,207,
209, 210, 212, 218, 223, 236, 237
Japan :
Commercial treaties 219, 1 16, 1 17
Treaties —
U. S.. 1894 s;i7 '■" l
U. S., 1911 965 070
Treaty-making power. 207, 218, 2:17
Japanese school question 897 01 1
Jay treaty-- .322,323,411,468,581- 642
Bibliography 631
Judicial decisions and treaties— 200.
270 272. 440
Digest of 285
Language of treaties 188,285
Law of treaties— 69,74,107, L89.285
Legal U Pi v -i--
3ToiTor~Blbl'io-
graphy - List of
¥&£&&&&CGp on the
treat y-making power,
C7i. C
A
2.