THE LETTERS 
 
 LORD BLACHFORD 
 
 of California 
 3rn Regional 
 iry Facility 
 
 CAWTHOEN, HUTT & SON, 
 
 24, COCKSPUR STREET, 
 CHARING CROSS, S.W.
 
 
 LIBRARY 
 
 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA 
 RIVERSIDE
 
 T 
 
 ,Mt8 
 
 
 
 " ISAAC FOOT <
 
 LETTERS 
 
 OF 
 
 FREDERIC LORD BLACHFORD
 
 PRINTED BY 
 SPOTTISWOODE AND CO., NEW-STREET SQUARE
 
 fi 
 
 , ^/totae
 
 (17 
 
 LETTERS 
 
 OF 
 
 UNDER -SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE COLONIES 
 1860-1871 
 
 EDITED BY 
 
 GEORGE EDEN MARINDIN 
 
 LONDON 
 
 JOHN MURRAY, ALBEMARLE STREET 
 1896
 
 PREFACE 
 
 IN putting together the following collection of letters one 
 object has been that the book should contain as little as 
 possible besides the letters themselves ; in other words, that 
 it should be Lord Blachford's letters and not a biography, while 
 at the same time it should be quite possible to trace the whole 
 life and character of the writer from his own letters, with the 
 aid of the few words of introduction which have been placed at 
 the beginning of each chapter. Some such connecting thread, 
 with notes here and there, seemed necessary to explain the 
 circumstances under which the letters at various periods were 
 written and the events to which they allude. 
 
 Lord Blachford left some notes of autobiography, written 
 for his family, regarding which he expressed a wish that they 
 should not be published, disliking (as he wrote) ' the rage for 
 printing at the present day ; ' but he gave a discretionary 
 power to extract any part, not of a private nature, if it should 
 seem desirable for any purpose to do so. Some extracts from 
 these reminiscences have accordingly been inserted in the 
 introductions to the chapters. He had a remarkable gift for 
 sketching character in a few telling 'words, and some of these 
 sketches, taken from his reminiscences, have been included. 
 With regard to some others, describing public men whom he 
 thought blameworthy, the conclusion has been reached, not, 
 it must be confessed, without reluctance, that he would not 
 have wished them to appear in a printed book. His own I 
 feeling as regards the publication of letters is expressed in a 
 letter to Sir Henry Taylor which appears on page 345. 
 
 His most constant correspondent, outside his own family,
 
 [6] LETTERS OF LORD B 
 
 in his earlier life and, with the exception of Dean Churi 
 and Sir Henry Taylor, the most constant also at a much later 
 period was Cardinal Newman. It is much to be regretted 
 that a box containing, with other papers, about forty letters 
 to Cardinal Newman, as well as a few of those to Dean Church, 
 was lost last year by the South Western Railway, when it 
 was being sent to the editor from Devonshire. There is 
 little hope of its recovery indeed there can hardly be any 
 doubt that the letters were long ago burnt by a disappointed 
 thief. Some months afterwards, however, when this book was 
 partly in type, the kind search of Cardinal Newman's literary 
 1 executor, the Rev. Father Neville, discovered seventy letters 
 written to Newman before he joined the Church of Rome. 
 After that time there had been a cessation of the correspond- 
 
 I ence for several years, and the lost letters, which were, it is 
 understood, chiefly on public matters of the day and on books, 
 all belonged to the last twenty years of Lord Blachford's life. 
 The seventy letters, so kindly placed at the editor's dis- 
 posal, belong to the period between 1832 and" 1842, during 
 part of which Rogers and Newman appear to have written to 
 one another once or twice a week, whenever either was absent 
 from Oxford. The very closeness of the intimacy in this 
 interchange of thought makes a large number of these letters 
 unsuitable for publication. They are mere scraps of answer 
 or comment, which, taken by themselves, throw no light on 
 the matters under discussion, and would be as difficult for the 
 reader to follow as a dialogue in which the words of one of 
 the speakers are omitted. Of the thirty-two letters which 
 have been selected, several bear to some extent on discussions, 
 or proposals, or persons connected with the Oxford Movement, 
 and will be both clear and interesting to those who still follow 
 out that history ; and some have a separate value besides, as 
 explaining letters of Newman already published, which answer 
 them or are answered by them. 
 
 G. E. MARINDIN. 
 
 BROOMFIELDS : September 1896.
 
 CONTENTS 
 
 CHAPTER PAGE 
 
 I. SCHOOL LIFE AND UNDERGRADUATE LIFE AT OXFORD . . i 
 
 II. RESIDENCE AT OXFORD AS A FELLOW OF ORIEL . . . 14 
 
 III. WINTER AT ROME. RELINQUISHMENT OF OXFORD LIFE . 63 
 
 IV. IN LONDON, READING LAW AND WRITING FOR THE 'TIMES,' 
 
 AND EARLY OFFICIAL LIFE (1842-1850) 112 
 
 V. CONTINUATION OF WORK AS COMMISSIONER OF EMIGRATION . 139 
 
 VI. MISSION TO PARIS ON THE COOLIE QUESTION . . . . 170 
 
 VII. UNDER-SECRETARY FOR THE COLONIES ..... 225 
 
 VIII. LAST YEARS OF OFFICIAL LIFE (1866-1870) . . . . 263 
 
 IX. EIGHTEEN YEARS (1871-1889); PARTLY PARLIAMENTARY LIFE; 
 
 BUT CHIEFLY LlFE AT BLACHFORD . . . . . 306 
 
 PORTRAITS 
 
 LORD BLACHFORD (from a crayon by George Richmond) . . Frontispiece 
 
 LORD BLACHFORD (from a photograph by W. Heath & Co. 
 
 Plymouth} .......... to face p. 306
 
 Errata 
 
 Page 131, line 1 5, for Elliott read Elliot. 
 , , 224, note, for Loundon read Lowder. 
 ,, 258, line 23, for Foster read Forster. 
 ,, 276, line l8,for Stanfield read Stansfeld.
 
 LETTERS 
 
 OF 
 
 FREDERIC LORD BLACHFORD 
 
 CHAPTER I 
 School Life and Undergraduate Life at Oxford 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS, afterwards Lord BLACHFORD, was born in 
 1811. His father, Frederick Leman Rogers, at that time in 
 the Audit Office, was a younger brother and eventually the 
 successor of Sir John Rogers of Blachford, near Ivybridge in 
 South Devon ; his mother was a daughter of Colonel Deare, 
 of the Bengal Artillery. The Blachford property and the 
 baronetcy passed in succession to Frederic Rogers himself, to 
 his next brother John, and to his youngest surviving brother 
 Edward, who died in 1895 as tenth and last baronet. 
 
 In the first half of the century school life began early, 
 and Frederic Rogers went when he was seven years old 
 to Mr. Polehampton's school at Worplesdon. Among his 
 schoolfellows there, and subsequently at Eton, was James 
 Colvile (the late Sir James Colvile), whose sister he afterwards 
 married. A holiday visit which Frederic Rogers paid to the 
 home of his school friend is alluded to in a letter written by 
 Mrs. Colvile. 
 
 ' Rogers is so happy that he stays till Tuesday, instead 
 of going to-morrow. When I asked him if he thought he 
 
 B
 
 2 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. i 
 
 might stay two nights more, he said : " My mother, ma'am, 
 said if you liked me to stay she had not the least objection, 
 but at the same time she thought it very unlikely you would 
 ask me." Mr. Polehampton would have been quite flattered 
 if he had heard James and Rogers settling quite gravely at 
 dinner that their sons should certainly go to " Poley's," for 
 Rogers said " he was quite convinced there was not so good 
 a school in England of the kind." He is a clever boy of his 
 age, up to so much conversation of all kinds. He asked 
 James whether he thought John Napper (a schoolfellow) a 
 good arguer. Jem said he supposed he was, " for he always 
 got him into a puzzle in five minutes." " Ah ! but that is 
 because he takes unfair advantage. If one makes a real 
 mistake, a palpable one, he takes hold of that, and, whatever 
 one says after, throws that mistake in one's teeth. I hold 
 that not to be close arguing." Certainly the world is more 
 forward than it was, when boys of eleven and twelve argue 
 about arguing.' 
 
 The directness of reply and the turn for analysing 
 are both characteristic. From Worplesdon he went in 1821 
 to Eton, to Miss Angelo's house. His tutor for the first 
 year was Mr. Drury, on whose retirement from Eton he 
 became the pupil of Mr. Chapman, afterwards Bishop of 
 Colombo. Those who know the Eton history of that time 
 will understand why this change of pupil-rooms was not un- 
 welcome to him. Of Chapman he always spoke with 
 gratitude ' not a clever man,' he says in some notes of auto- 
 biography, ' and inordinately given to long words, but enough 
 of a scholar to teach scholarship, with the steady influence 
 for good, moral and intellectual, of a man who made me feel 
 that I was his friend and that he was anxious for my good.' 
 
 In his six years at Eton he won several distinctions, 
 especially for Greek and Latin verses, and reached the position 
 of 'Captain of the Oppidans.' In his leisure time he was fond 
 of cricket, in which he became proficient enough to be in the 
 ' Second Eleven ; ' but his favourite amusement was swim-
 
 1821-7 SCHOOL AND UNDERGRADUATE LIFE 3 
 
 ming, and among his anecdotes of Eton life, he tells how he 
 once jumped off Windsor bridge in company with Arthur 
 Hallam, at that time his most intimate friend. ' What induced 
 him to propose it, I do not know, unless it was the example 
 set by Selvvyn ' or some such philolute. As far as I was 
 concerned, water was by this time my element. The " Angelo 
 water rats " (Shadwells, Snows, Denisons, &c.) was a pro- 
 verbial phrase. The feat was performed to our own satis- 
 faction. I remember a quick sensation as I was making my 
 way through the air to the black water below " Shall I go 
 back ? No, I can't." It was a simple proceeding if you 
 could only keep yourself perpendicular, otherwise you might 
 sprain your back or get a tremendous slap from the water 
 when you reached it.' Another Eton story, which seems to 
 carry us still further away from the customs of the present 
 time, gives one of his experiences, as a sixth-form boy, of 
 Dr. Keate's remarkable fancy for working himself up into a 
 passion and fulminating a threat which he could not well put f 
 into execution. Keate, because some boys had been in- : 
 attentive, chose to keep his division long after the usual time 
 of dismissal. ' I ejaculated (too distinctly), " Well, if this is 
 not a shame, never was one." He turned on me red as a 
 turkey-cock, howled out his reprobation, and told me to stay 
 and speak to him afterwards not privately, but in the 
 presence of several boys. He asked me fiercely whether I 
 still thought it a shame. I replied, I was very sorry for what 
 I had said. " But do you still think it a shame, sir ? " (" Sir " 
 having always in his mouth the effect of " sirrah "). I said, ' 
 " I spoke hastily." " But, sir, do you still think it a shame ? 
 because, if you do, say so at once, and I will expel you on 
 the spot." I ought to add that he afterwards had me up 
 privately and talked to me in a tone of remonstrance, which 
 from its kindness and reasonableness brought the tears into 
 my eyes.' 
 
 1 Afterwards Bishop of New Zealand. 
 
 B ^
 
 4 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. r 
 
 In his last year at Eton, Frederic Rogers took a leading 
 part in a literary periodical, ' The Eton Miscellany,' which had 
 been first set on foot by Arthur Hallam and Doyle (afterwards 
 Sir Francis Doyle), in the hope that it might have the same 
 success and length of life as ' The Microcosm ' and ' The 
 Etonian.' He has left the following record of it : ' Gladstone 2 
 became at once the backbone, editor and responsible for filling 
 up the pages. After July 1 827, Gladstone, Doyle, and I were 
 the committee of management. Gladstone's most effective 
 production was, I think, a humorous poem in twelve-syllable 
 lines on a deserting member of the corps afterwards Lord 
 Hanmer. Hallam was always straining after something above 
 his powers. Doyle was a spirited writer of verses, but rather 
 too plagiaristic. I was successful in one or two papers con- 
 taining translations of nursery rhymes into Greek, and in a 
 mock heroic Spenserian composition. But the affair was a 
 failure, and most of my doings contemptible. The book con- 
 tains characters of all the contributors under noms de plume. 
 Bishop Selwyn figures as Anthony Heaviside, Gladstone as 
 Bartholomew Bouverie. I appear as Philip Montagu, Hanmer 
 was David ap Rice ; Doyle was Francis Jermyn.' 
 
 The ' Eton Miscellany,' of which copies still exist, ranks 
 higher in merit among kindred publications than Lord 
 Blachford's words would imply. It has, indeed,- fewer papers 
 which escape dulness than the ' Etonian/ and it certainly did 
 not approach the reputation which that magazine enjoys a 
 reputation, it must be confessed, not perfectly easy for an un- 
 prejudiced reader at this distance of time to understand but 
 it has more real merit than most school periodicals. Among 
 the causes for a lesser measure of success than the talents of 
 its promoters might lead us to expect, it may be noted that 
 all its contributors were schoolboys, whereas some of the 
 writers in the ' Etonian ' had passed on to the University ; and 
 also that in 1827 the educational mills were already beginning 
 
 2 Right Hon. W. E. Gladstone.
 
 1827 SCHOOL AND UNDERGRADUATE LIFE 5 
 
 (rightly enough) to grind smaller, and there was not quite as 
 much liberty for particular genius to go its own way in litera- 
 ture, outside the school course, as there had been even ten 
 years earlier. 
 
 In 1827 he went from Eton to Oxford, and entered at 
 Oriel. His Eton reputation for ability and scholarship had 
 preceded him. The younger Fellows of Oriel were at this 
 time eagerly exerting themselves to raise the standard of their ^ 
 College, and it was said that Newman had lately written to 
 a friend among the Eton masteTiTasking him to recommend 
 some good Eton men for admission to Oriel. Newman was 
 the tutor who could make most of any brilliant man who 
 passed through his hands, and to him Frederic Rogers was 
 allotted as a pupil. But he speaks also of obligations to two 
 
 other tutors of Oriel to Hurrell Froude and to Robert 
 
 L t <<MI 
 
 Wilberforce, 3 ' whose solid knowledge and industry were valu- 
 able in the group of tutors, furnishing a kind of complement 
 to Newman and Froude. In particular he had a method of 
 laying out history so that facts hung on to each other in a way 
 which made you recollect the time, place, and conditions of 
 each, as part of a chronological whole.' Of Hurrell Froude 
 he says : ' He was anything but learned. In lecture he gave 
 you the idea of not being, in knowledge, so very much in 
 advance of those whom he taught ; but he had a fine taste, a 
 quick and piercing precision of thought, a fertility and depth 
 of reasoning, which stimulated a mind which had any quick- 
 ness and activity. He had an interest in everything ; he 
 would' draw with you, sail on the river with you, talk philo- 
 sophy or politics with you, ride over fences with you, skate 
 with you all with a kind of joyous enjoyment. Mischief 
 seems to have been his snare as a boy, and a controlled 
 delight in what was on the edge of mischief gave a kind of 
 verve to his character as a man. This made him charming 
 to those whom he liked. But then he did not choose to like 
 
 3 Son of William Wilberforce and elder brother of the Bishop.
 
 6 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. i 
 
 any whom he did not respect ; and he could be as hard and 
 sharp as you please on what he thought bad -profane, 
 vicious, or coxcombical.' These three men the more in- 
 spiring among the tutors of Oriel at that day had some 
 difference of opinion with the dons of the old school, as to 
 whether the tutor was to be (as they thought right) in loco 
 barentis to his pupils, charged with the responsibility of their 
 moral and intellectual development, and having some discre- 
 tionary power to carry it out, or whether he was to be little 
 more than a lecturer under the supervision of the Provost and 
 Dean. As a result Newman gave up all his pupils except 
 Frederic Rogers, who was marked out by high character and 
 by ability he had already in 1829 won the Craven scholar- 
 ship as an undergraduate of special promise. He was thus, 
 in his fourth year at Oxford, Newman's only pupil, working 
 very hard under his guidance. The intimacy between tutor 
 and pupil became still closer, when, in the long vacation of 
 1831, he took lodgings at Iffley near Newman's house, and not 
 only read with Newman, but spent most of his evenings with 
 him and his mother and sisters. Among the ties of sympathy 
 was a common love of music. 
 
 To /its Sister. 
 
 Oxford (Iffley) : August 12, 1831. / 
 
 yr 
 
 My dear Marian, Many thanks for the housekeeping 
 advice, which I doubt not I shall find most useful. I am 
 beginning to get into the way of reading, and of not being 
 very miserable, which at first I was rather, for I find that 
 the two miles divide me completely from Gladstone, 
 Denison, 4 &c., and though I like Newman very much, and 
 more as I know more of him, yet in the first place his leisure 
 hours are spent much with his family, and secondly, we are 
 
 4 Henry Denison, a friend at Eton, brother of the Speaker and of the 
 at Oxford, and in later life. Regained Bishop of Salisbury, 
 a double first class in 1831. He was
 
 1831 SCHOOL AND UNDERGRADUATE LIFE 7 
 
 not quite of the same age. However, now I begin to feel 
 very comfortable and independent, and really it would be 
 quite ridiculous if one were to feel unhappy whenever left by 
 oneself for a month or two. However, as aforesaid, I am 
 beginning now to feel very comfortable. My day is spent 
 pretty much as follows : I get up ; walk out with a book for 
 about half an hour ; breakfast ; read about four or five hours ; 
 go out, generally row up to Oxford, which, with whatever I 
 may have to do there, takes me nearly three hours ; dine ; 
 stroll for about half an hour, and then return and read till I 
 go to bed. On the whole I am exceedingly glad I came 
 here, for I am sure it is almost the only thing which would 
 have made me read hard, and I think I shall do that now. 
 By-the-by, I have something to mention which perhaps will 
 be an agreeable surprise to my father, viz. that the other 
 morning as I was leaving Newman's room he informed me, in 
 a very embarrassed kind of way, that he hoped I understood ' 
 that I was reading with him as a college pupil and friend, an 
 intimation which certainly to me was as unexpected as any- 
 thing could be. I said what occurred to me on the subject^ 
 and the matter is now settled, only as that is the case I must 
 take care not to pester him. However, I really think I shall 
 get as much good from him by merely being under his super- 
 intendence as from any regular drudging, for he is 'a person 
 who does me more good, I think, in his remarks on my essays 
 and such like than in regular cram, and really he seems 
 disposed to give a very great deal of time to me if I could 
 with a good conscience exact it. However, at any rate, it 
 will be a serious diminution of one's yearly expenditure. 
 
 Your affectionate brother, 
 
 F. ROGERS. 
 
 In the early part of 1832 his eyes began to fail, and he 
 was obliged to give up reading and go home for a time. 
 Though this necessarily reduced the number of books which 
 he took up, he came back in the summer with greater vigour 
 for the final schools, and perhaps did not lose by the enforced 
 idleness ; at any rate, he secured a double first, in classics and 
 mathematics the only double first of that year.
 
 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. i 
 
 To Mrs. Rogers. 
 
 Oriel : May 27, 1832. 
 
 My dear Mother, I am sorry to say our suspense must 
 be rather more protracted than I at first supposed. I fear I 
 shall not be able to give you news of the classes being settled 
 for near a fortnight ; we are now in for' paper work, and our 
 viva voce will not, I hear, begin till that is finished, which will 
 hardly be before next Thursday or Friday. The viva voce 
 must take a week at least, and I suppose till it is literally all 
 over there will be little chance of knowing how matters stand. 
 We have had already three days of it. The first day I 
 managed very ill ; however, Newman says he is not dis- 
 satisfied with what I did, in itself, but that I ought to have 
 done much better. It was a moral essay, ' Examine the 
 sentiment " Vice loses half its evil by losing all its grossness," 
 and show how far principles of taste were allowed by the 
 ancient moralists as principles of ethics.' I liked the subject 
 exceedingly, but spent so much time in thinking on it and 
 ' trying to lay out a plan that I had not time to do more than 
 the first part of the subject, and the latter part of that in a 
 very hurried way. I was annoyed with myself, as I should 
 have liked particularly to have written on the last part. But 
 it is impossible (at least I find it so) to start at once and 
 write a complete moral essay in one sitting ; and I trust 
 others found it so too. Every one was dissatisfied with what 
 they had accomplished ; I most dreadfully so ; but I hope I 
 have done pretty well what I have done. I filled about four 
 and a half foolscap pages. 
 
 The next day we had Logic, which I think I did fairly, 
 and three pieces of EnglishTo turn into Latin. I finished one 
 and a half, which I fancy must have been what the generality 
 did. Newman said I had done well with the piece I had 
 finished which was in Livy's style, but had not very well hit 
 off the half piece which was in Cicero's. I do not and never 
 did pique myself on my Latin prose writing, but at the same 
 time I do think nothing could be less calculated to be turned
 
 1832 SCHOOL AND UNDERGRADUATE LIFE 9 
 
 into Latin than that piece, so that I hope others have failed 
 too. But I could not hope to do it well, as I had read so very 
 little Cicero, and that not lately. The third day, Saturday, 
 we had eight hours given us in order to draw up an accusation 
 or defence of a person accused of murder (the story being 
 given us) on the principles laid down in Aristotle's ' Rhetoric.' 
 Now, as I had not read the said ' Rhetoric ' and did not take it 
 up, I could not be expected to do this ; so I just mentioned 
 on my paper that I did not take it up, and therefore did a 
 Greek oration in the manner (as far as I could) of the Greek 
 Orators, upon the little I knew of Aristotle's principles. This 
 Greek oration occupied rather more than three sides of fools- 
 cap, and Newman said it was a very good imitation of their 
 style, and that he thought I should get a good deal of credit 
 for it. To-morrow we set to again. What we shall have I 
 know not. Hitherto I am pretty well satisfied with what I 
 have done. But the viva voce will be the trying.part, and that 
 will not come on for some days. My eyes have stood it capi- 
 tally. They only felt a very little uneasy yesterday, and I 
 hope I shall be able to get through the whole without having 
 any one to write for me, which will be an amazing advantage. 
 
 Poor , you will be extremely grieved to 'hear, has 
 
 actually by keeping his mind constantly fixed on one subject 
 (even after he had put off his degree) nearly driven himself 
 out of his mind. The night before last, about six o'clock, he 
 disappeared, and did not appear again till a tutor of Balliol 
 the next day met him wandering about Oxford about five 
 o'clock, quite unable to give any account of himself. He had 
 been wandering about on the London road all night, and then 
 came in exhausted and ill. He was immediately put to bed, 
 and under Dr. Wootton's care, and is now very much 
 better. But you may judge what low spirits he had been in 
 lately, when I tell you that one of his friends said what a 
 relief it would be to him to find that he had been only drowned 
 bathing, and that they were on the point of dragging a little 
 stream which was round a university walk which he had 
 walked in a good deal the two evenings before. Of course 
 the anxiety of every one till he reappeared was extreme ; but 
 I cannot say I ever apprehended anything like what some
 
 io LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. i 
 
 seem to have feared. However, I will now finish and not 
 work my eyes any more, as I wish to rest them a little to-day. 
 So with love to all, believe me 
 
 Your affectionate son, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS. 
 
 To Mrs. Rogers. 
 
 Oriel, June 9, 1832. 
 
 Hurrah ! I have not yet seen the class list, but the first 
 class contains : 
 
 1. Something or other Brewer, 5 Queen's. 
 
 2. Francis Hastings Doyle, 6 Christchurch. 
 
 3. Frederic Rogers, Oriel. 
 
 I shall write to-morrow and tell you all about it 
 Your affectionate son, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS. 
 
 To Mrs. Rogers. 
 
 Oxford, June 10, 1832. 
 
 My dear Mother, I suppose you have received the three 
 lines which I sent off by coach last night in order to take you 
 out of your anxiety. In case you should not I repeat that 
 there are only three first classes, myself, Breiver of Queen's, 
 and Doyle. Brewer, I fancy, must be the best ; the list of 
 books which he took up seems to have been something more 
 \ enormous than anything which has ever been heard of, and he 
 really knew them, and had profited by them. His essays 
 (on history in particular) were excellent, and his viva voce^ too, 
 capital. Doyle and myself I should think were pretty much 
 on a par. My papers, I think, were better than his, and his 
 viva voce was very decidedly far better than mine. In fact, as 
 I told you before, mine was a failure. I never expected it 
 would have been otherwise. 
 
 Borrett, an Ireland scholar, has got only a second. I think 
 \ what has done well for me is that Greek oration of which I 
 ( spoke to you. I do not think anything else of mine could 
 
 5 J. S. Brewer, the historian. 
 
 6 The late Sir Francis Doyle, afterwards Professor of Poetry at Oxford.
 
 
 
 1832 SCHOOL AND UNDERGRADUATE LIFE n 
 
 have been very shining : on that I do pique myself. . W.'s 
 failure was owing to very bad divinity, He told them that 
 Jeroboam was the son of Rehoboam, and that "TRe son of 
 Saul who was a friend of David's was named Absalom. On 
 which they asked him whether he had ever read the Old 
 Testament, and he answered, in a kind of jaunty way, ' Yes, 
 yes, that he had read most of it, he had got a good way 
 in it.' 
 
 v As to mathematics, I am not very sanguine ; I find that 
 what I have forgotten is immense, and my eyes are certainly 
 not strong enough to bear more than about six hours a day 
 even of the kind of writing which mathematics requires, so 
 that I almost despair of making up my lost ground on that 
 point. Johnson, 7 too, I hear, expresses doubts. However I 
 hope that now I have got the principal one you will not let 
 the secondary matter trouble you at all. A double first is a 
 very nice thing certainly, and one would rather have a double 
 than not ; but at the same time a first and second is a most 
 excellent thing to sit down on, and a thing that one has no 
 manner of right to fidget oneself about. 
 
 To Mrs. Rogers. 
 
 Oriel, June , 1832. 
 
 I write in a very great hurry just to say that I have got my 
 first [in mathematics] in spite of a little bad luck in the exami- 
 nation. On the whole, the examination was easy and tolerably 
 favburable, but an unlucky accident happened. I had taken 
 up Hydrostatics at a shot, knowing that there was hardly 
 anything in them, and intending to get up a few formulae the 
 night before the Hydrostatic paper was given, and then try 
 my chance. I heard the Hydrostatic paper was to be on 
 Thursday, and went in on Wednesday evening, not having ever 
 in the course of my life opened a book on the subject, and 
 knowing consequently practically nothing about the subject. 
 Conceive of my astonishment and consternation on seeing 
 before me the very Hydrostatic paper. I did, by good luck, 
 one question, a tolerably difficult one luckily, which did not 
 
 7 His mathematical ' coach,' afterwards Dean of Wells.
 
 12 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. i 
 
 imply much knowledge of fluids, and half of another, and then 
 my knowledge failed me. Since then I rather (as I thought) 
 failed in Optics and Mechanics, and have been rather queer 
 these two last days. However, I fancy I did the first papers 
 very well well enough, at least, to make up beforehand all 
 the ground I since lost and here I am in the first class. 
 Johnson is profuse in praises ; he says he considers it as even 
 more creditable to me than my classical first, from the very 
 great disadvantage I laboured under, &c. He is a man who 
 had no idea of a man's getting a first in mathematics by any 
 other method than by knowing by heart every formula that 
 ^ver was invented, which of course with my eyes was impos- 
 sible, and I have now and then rather astonished him by my 
 ignorance of these formulae, and sometimes by showing him 
 that it was possible to answer a question without them. 
 However, I must finish, as it is candle-light, and I am in a 
 great hurry. 
 
 Your affectionate son, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS. 
 
 To Frederick Leman Rogers, Esq. 
 
 Oriel : July I, 1832. 
 
 My dear Father, I send you, as you see, a class list, not 
 that I suppose there will be anything particularly interesting 
 in it to you (though perhaps Mamma may like to see my 
 name actually in print] ; but as you must pay postage you 
 may as well have the classes as well as the letter. We are 
 actually employed here in getting up a subscription to found 
 a prize or something of that kind in honour of the Duke of 
 Wellington. I do not know what you think of His conduct 
 lately, but here we are all in the highest admiration of him. 8 
 Bruce showed me three letters (at least copies of them), one 
 from Lord Harrowby to Lord Wharncliffe, one from Lord 
 Wharncliffe to the Duke, and the Duke's answer immediately 
 
 * This refers to the Duke of Welling- to his withdrawal from active opposition 
 
 ton's action in regard to the Reform to the Bill in deference to the King's 
 
 Bill ; to his advice to the King that he wish. 
 should recall Lord Grey to power, and
 
 1832 SCHOOL AND UNDERGRADUATE LIFE 13 
 
 previous to the second reading of the Bill in the House of 
 Lords, which were extremely characteristic and which certainly 
 gave me an entirely high opinion of the Duke's character. I 
 hardly know what to do with my books, whether to leave 
 them here or at least the greater part of them till I stand 
 at Oriel, as I should probably want them in case I got in, or 
 to bring them all home at once and have done with the 
 matter. 
 
 Your affectionate son, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS.
 
 i 4 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. n 
 
 CHAPTER II 
 Residence at Oxford as a Fellow of Oriel 
 
 IN 1833 Mr. Rogers was elected to a Fellowship at Oriel, 
 and in the following year he gained the Vinerian Scholarship. 1 
 From this time till 1841 he was regularly in residence at 
 Oriel, taking pupils, and pursuing his own reading as far as the 
 weakness of eyes at that time permitted. Some of his letters 
 show how much pains he took to encourage and direct the 
 private reading of his youngest brother Edward, who was 
 then an Eton boy, and some years later a Student of Christ 
 Church. 
 
 As a Fellow of Oriel he was drawn into even closer 
 friendship with Newman, of whose power of sympathy with 
 congenial minds he writes strongly : ' Newman seemed to 
 have an intuitive perception of all that you thought and felt, 
 so that he caught at once all that you meant or were driving 
 at in a sentiment, a philosophical reflection, or a joke within 
 a certain circle, no doubt, but within a circle which compre- 
 hended all your common sympathies. And so there was in 
 talking with him that combination of liveliness and repose 
 which constitutes ease ; you seemed to be speaking with a 
 better kind of self, which was drawing you upwards. New- 
 man's general characteristics his genius, depth of purpose; 
 his hatred of pomp and affectation ; his piercing insight into 
 the workings of the human mind at least that part of it 
 which is best worth knowing his strong and tenacious, if 
 
 1 A scholarship in Law.
 
 
 RESIDENCE AT OXFORD 15 
 
 ^r ^mf . - 
 
 somewhat fastidious, affection (not, it must be confessed, 
 without a certain tenacity of aversion also) are all matters 
 of history. I should add that he always seemed to me to 
 have a kind of repugnance to the highly finished manners of 
 the man~of the world. Nothing covers what is behind it so 
 completely as moral or physical polish. It reveals nothing 
 but what it reflects. And this Newman did not like. It 
 baffled him and kept him at a distance. He did not know 
 what matter of interest he could touch with confidence ; and 
 this to a man, who is keenly alive to sympathy or the want ot 
 it, means an atmosphere of artificial constraint. As the 
 [Oxford] movement gathered power in his hands he became 
 somewhat more disinclined to men who affected an indepen- 
 dent position, and was quick in detecting a growing diver- 
 gence, though sometimes curiously over-confident in his power - 
 
 of counteracting an adverse prepossession In Newman's 
 
 Sermons and Hurrell Froude's conversation I found an un- 
 compromising devotion to religion with a discouragement oi 
 anything like gushing profession, which I had been brought up 
 to dislike and distrust also a religion which was fervent and 
 reforming in essentials with a due reverence for existing 
 authorities and habits and traditions, all which I had been 
 brought up to respect also a religion which did not reject, 
 but aspired to embody in itself, any form of art and literature, 
 poetry, philosophy, and even science which could be pressed 
 into the service of Christianity. And this met my own desires 
 and tastes not to say my own conception of what man was 
 made for. And lastly I was greatly captivated by the idea I 
 that it was possible for a Church not only to teach the truth, ^ 
 but by its discipline to clear itself from impurities and enforce 
 to a certain extent holiness of life among those who belonged 
 to it. Like the rest of our small circle, I fully believed that 
 Newman was to do something indefinitely great in the 
 direction of Christian Church revival revival in holiness, < 
 discipline, and authority."
 
 1 6 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. n 
 
 Newman was even more anxious to have Frederic Rogers 
 as a confidant, with whom he could talk over all difficulties, 
 after "the death of Hurrell Froude in 1836 ; and for the next 
 year or two they were together a great part of most days 
 during the Oxford term. Dean Church has made clear the 
 history of what followed this periocFin a narrative 2 which for 
 style has hardly been surpassed in the English language. On 
 this history it would be out of place to dwell here : all 
 necessary explanation can best be given by quoting a few 
 words from an article whjch Dean Church wrote upon 
 Lord Blachford's death. ' From Mr. Newman his pupil 
 % j- caught that earnest devotion to the cause of the Church 
 which was supreme with him through life. He entered 
 heartily into Mr. Newman's purpose to lift the level of the 
 \ English Church and its clergy. While Mr. Newman at 
 Oxford was fighting the battle of the English Church, there 
 was no one who was a closer friend than Rogers, no one in 
 whom Mr. Newman had such trust, none whose judgment he 
 so valued, no one in whose companionship he so delighted ; 
 and the master's friendship was returned by the disciple with 
 a noble and tender and yet manly honesty. There came, as 
 we know, times which strained even that friendship ; when the 
 disciple, just at the moment when the master most needed 
 and longed for sympathy and counsel, had to choose between 
 his duty to his Church and the claims and ties of friendship. 
 He could not follow in the course which his master and friend 
 had found inevitable ; and that deepest and most delightful 
 friendship had to be given up. But it was given up, not 
 indeed without great suffering on both sides, but without 
 bitterness or unworthy thoughts. The friend had seen too 
 closely the greatness and purity of his master's character to 
 fail in tenderness and loyalty, even when he thought his 
 master going most wrong. He recognised that the error, 
 deplorable as he thought it, was the mistake of a lofty and 
 
 ' The Oxford Movement.
 
 
 1832 RESIDENCE AT OXFORD 17 
 
 unselfish soul ; and in the height of the popular outcry he 
 came forward, with a distant and touching reverence, to take 
 his old friend's part and rebuke the clamour. And at length 
 the time came when disagreements were long left behind 
 and each person had finally taken his recognised place ; 
 and then the old ties were built up again. It could not 
 be the former friendship of every day and of absolute and 
 unreserved confidence. But it was the old friendship of 
 affection and respect renewed, and pleasure in the inter- 
 change of thoughts. It was a friendship of the antique 
 type, more common, perhaps, even in the last century than 
 it is with us, but enriched with Christian hopes and Christian 
 convictions.' 3 *^^ 
 
 ^f 
 
 To Rev. J. H. Newman. 
 
 Eliot Place : December 21, 1832. 
 
 My dear Newman, I hope you received before you 
 started two letters of introduction for Malta. ... I suppose 
 you saw the classical class list before you started : in the 
 Mathematics, Froude of course has his first ; Maule (if you 
 know the man) is the only double ; Marriott has got a second. 
 Does not the present system appear from the class list to be 
 abominable ? As far as my own acquaintances go, their 
 places seem to have been regulated by their powers of using 
 philosophical talk (or rather the talk seems a sine qua non\ 
 without reference to whether they understood it or not. (I 
 do not mean any disrespect to several men who I know de- 
 served well what they got.) 
 
 The Elections, as I suppose you will see by the papers, 
 are dreadful the Tories beaten everywhere e.g. Hampshire 
 returns four Whigs Pusey is thrown out for Berkshire 
 Sadler for Leeds, Wetherall for Oxford, &c., &c. (though, on 
 the other hand, Manners Sutton is returned for Cambridge 
 University, and Sir R. Vyvyan for Bristol, and Gladstone 
 turns out Wilde for Newark). Cobbett and Gully are like- 
 wise among our legislators. The only consolation is that the 
 
 * Reprinted, by permission, from the Guardian.
 
 1 8 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. n 
 
 Parliament cannot be worse than it was. However, their 
 systerrrof"dividing the polling places, Registry, &c., certainly 
 does seem to have answered ; there have been few riots, and 
 the elections seem each fairly finished in two days. . . . 
 With kindest remembrances to Froude, 
 
 Believe me yours affectionately, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS. 
 
 To Rev. J. H. Newman. 
 
 Oriel : April 12, 1833. 
 
 My dear Newman, In the first place I am m. 4 Wilson, I 
 am truly sorry to say, is not ; Marriott being the other winner. 
 I suppose your having leave fill September (which I hope 
 you have by this time heard of) will not keep you out till 
 then. If it will, pray tell me, and also tell me your plans ; 
 for I shall feel strongly tempted in that case to make a start 
 myself towards you. However, this will of course depend on 
 my health and eyes. I shall give up everything to these last. 
 They have stood the examination most splendidly, though I 
 suppose I shall feel it now that the excitement is gone off. 
 
 All this time I have not thanked you for your letter, 
 which I was truly delighted to receive, and for the permission 
 to see your verses, for which I was equally thankful. 5 I have 
 only been able to see some of them, as I have had one 
 opportunity only since your letter to me arrived. I need 
 hardly say how much I was pleased with what I did see. 
 
 H. Wilberforce is here, well, and intending to be ordained 
 the next opportunity ; he is to take Mr. Sargent's curacy as 
 you, I suppose, know. You (or rather We ! /) really should 
 make him some college officer whose duty would be connected 
 with the elections. He would perform it so well. Even at 
 present he clearly thinks he ought to come up to all the 
 
 4 I.e. have gained an Oriel Fellow- series of poems which Newman wrote 
 ship. during his travels and sent home. Many 
 
 5 This refers to a long letter from of them were published eventually in 
 Mr. Newman, dated Rome, March 5, the ' Lyra Apostolica ; ' among them 
 1833, which is printed in ' Letters and ' Lead, Kindly Light,' which he wrote 
 Correspondence of J. H. Newman,' on the voyage from Palermo to Mar- 
 vol. i. p. 361. The 'verses' were a seilles (Newman's ' Apologia,' p. 35).
 
 1833 RESIDENCE AT OXFORD ig 
 
 Elections. He is going now to finish this letter, as my eyes 
 are, after all my boasts, not quite up to the work, without at 
 least delaying the letter. 
 
 Keble wishes me to suggest to you that you might make 
 sometfTing useful (for the ' British Critic/ I suppose) out of the 
 state of the clergy abroad as you have observed it, to show 
 people what it is to have a depraved sort of clergy. An 
 amplification, in short, of what you have written home to me 
 and others. 
 
 Yours most affectionately, 
 
 F. ROGERS. 
 
 To Edivard Rogers* 
 
 Oriel : November 15, 1833. 
 
 Dear Edward, I have not had time to answer your letter 
 before, else I should have done so. You know that what I 
 want you to do is to get as much of a taste for poetry as you 
 can, and the ability to see what is and what 'is not poetical. 
 Now I think there are some papers in the ' Spectator,' and 
 there certainly are some in the ' Rambler,' which criticise 
 Milton. I should like you to look out these and read them 
 attentively over, and when you have looked them over, and 
 think you well understand what are the chief points which 
 they notice e.g. whether they praise or blame his choice of 
 expressions, his harmony, or his thoughts whether they think 
 he is too bombastical, or only just artistic enough for his 
 subject, &c., &c. when, I say, you have seen what is said on 
 points such as these, begin to read the first, and if you like, the 
 second book of Miltori*s ' Paradise Lost ' carefully, two or three 
 times 'over, and try to make up your mind for yourself whether 
 what is said in praise or blame of him is just and true, or not 
 I do not know how long you will be about this, but when you 
 have done it, write to me, and tell me some of the passages 
 which you like, and (if you can) why you like them, and tell 
 me any expressions which you think describe well what they 
 want to describe, and whether you think the lines are more 
 or less harmonious than other blank verse which you have 
 
 6 Then a boy at Eton.
 
 20 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. n 
 
 read e.g. Southey's ' Roderick,' which you can look at again 
 for the purpose ; this you must find out by spouting them 
 both to yourself and anything else which occurs to you like 
 this, and do not be afraid of making mistakes, but say every- 
 thing which suggests itself to you. If you like Milton you can 
 go on : if you do not, then write to me and I will teTTyou some- 
 thing else. And if I do not answer you immediately, it will 
 always do you good to go over those poems of Southey's or 
 Scott's which you have liked, trying to look not merely for 
 the story but for poetical passages, and spirited or beautiful 
 descriptions, good similes, &c., and when you get to anything 
 which strikes you, read it over and over again, and do not be 
 satisfied till you know it pretty well. However, this is 
 enough on the subject of reading. I shall be glad to hear 
 from you how you are getting on with your tutor and your 
 school work ; recollect always that that is the first point. 
 I was much amused, too, at your account of the row at the 
 Fair, which I had Tiot heard of before. I am going home for 
 a day or two to-morrow to keep term at Lincoln's Inn ; and 
 then shall come home a second time, I suppose, soon after 
 you will. 
 
 Remember me to both the Wilders and my tutor if you 
 have an opportunity. I am extremely glad indeed that you 
 are more comfortable in Long Chamber. 7 
 
 Your very affectionate brother, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS. 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 Oriel : November 13, 1834. 
 
 My dear Katherine, I am now safely lodged in the 
 Vinerian Scholarship, without opposition, and it was only by 
 the most providential chance that I missed having the Vice- 
 Chancellor, both the Proctors, and divers other functionaries 
 as registrars, &c., with their noses in the air for an hour or 
 two waiting to admit me. I concluded that, like other 
 
 7 Edward Rogers was a ' Colleger ' buildings were erected under Provost 
 at Eton ; and the ' Long Chamber ' Hodgson and Dr. Hawtrey) was the 
 of College in those days (before the new reverse of comfortable.
 
 1834 RESIDENCE AT OXFORD 21 
 
 concerns of that kind, it would take its course without any 
 trouble on my part, and accordingly, about the time when the 
 election was going on, quietly took my hat and stick and set 
 out with a friend to walk. However, that kind of instinctive 
 sense of where my interest lay common to all classes of 
 animals insensibly led me towards the schools where I knew 
 they were employed upon me ; and I had not gone far before 
 I met a functionary called the Marshal hurrying down to tell 
 me that I should be wanted almost directly to be admitted 
 with cap, gown, bands, white neckcloth, and all the et ceteras 
 of academical habit. If they had been a quarter of an hour 
 longer about the election, I should have been a mile off. 
 As it was, I instantly borrowed a white cravat from one 
 friend, bands from another, swore allegiance to His Majesty, 
 and specified all that was damnable, heretical, and so on in 
 excommunications of princes, abjured the authority of the 
 Pope of Rome, and became Vinerian Scholar, or, as the Vice- 
 Chancellor words it, ' was admitted to all the privileges, 
 honours, and emoluments of the Vinerian Scholarship,' to the 
 great credit of the University and my own no small profit. 
 
 The Duke of Wellington and our ' Parliamentary friends ' 
 have written down to the Heads of Houses to say that they 
 find great difficulty in defending our present position with 
 regard to our imposition of the Articles at Entrance. True 
 enough for them. I should think they would be about as 
 much at home in defending the doctrine of Justification, or 
 the Articles themselves. However, our Heads have been 
 persuaded, and are to bring forward a form of declaration 
 which they intend substituting for it. I suppose the question 
 will soon come on in Convocation, and there will be, I pre- 
 sume, a great fight. 8 However, I do not know whether you 
 
 8 Undergraduates at Oxford (though seem now) by a great many others as 
 
 not at Cambridge) were at that time re- well. On November 10, 1834, the 
 
 quired on their matriculation to subscribe Heads of Colleges, by a majority of one, 
 
 to the Thirty-nine Articles. Dr. Hamp- decided to bring before Convocation a 
 
 den had published a pamphlet advocating measure for freeing undergraduates 
 
 the abolition of this rule, with a view from subscription. In May 1835, the 
 
 to the admission of Nonconformists. measure was rejected in Convocation 
 
 He was opposed not only by the extreme by a very large majority (see Church's : 
 
 Tractarian party, but (strange as it may Oxford Movement, pp. 125-138).
 
 22 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. n 
 
 take enough interest in these University details to know 
 what I am talking about. 
 
 Your affectionate brother, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS. 
 
 To Rev. J. H. Newman. 
 
 Eliot Place : December 28, 1834. 
 
 My dear Newman, Many thanks for your note which I 
 was most extremely glad to receive. Of course we shall be 
 delighted to see you at Blackheath ; tell me somewhat before- 
 hand when you can come, and I will take care to have some 
 Oxford friends to meet you. 
 
 Gladstone, I hear, is to be a Lord of the Treasury, which 
 I suppos^e is a very good start for a young nRmrrz/TFz^ He 
 is in town, "and, I suppose, has not come up for nothing. By 
 the way, do not the Ministerials seem to guard their expres- 
 sions of opposition to the admission of Dissenters with us ? 
 1 see always ' as a claim of right ' scrupulously inserted in such 
 declarations. What do you say of the Ministry ? I was 
 rather struck at the description of Dissenters they have at 
 Bradfield, where, if anywhere, I should have hoped to find they 
 had not penetrated. 9 They seem to be quite in the old 
 Charles I. style, believing almost in their own inspiration, 
 and practising such very audacious dishonesty without detri- 
 ment to their religion. One man professing particular piety 
 justifies keeping his beershop open on Sunday by its being 
 in the way of business. Another will not vote for Pusey, 1 
 
 * because he will give his vote to no man who has not the fear 
 of God in his heart. Meantime he has been detected in gross 
 
 I cheating in horse-dealing. I got rather into a scrape there for 
 advocating amusements for the poor on Sunday Keble is 
 in bad odour for having done it before me. "" 
 
 I have nothing to tell you that you will not see in the 
 
 9 Bradfield in Berkshire. Mr. Stevens, Berkshire against Mr. John Walter (the 
 
 the founder of Bradfield College, at elder), by whom he had been defeated 
 
 that time held the living. in 1832. He was elected in 1834 and 
 
 1 Mr. Philip Pusey, elder brother of held the seat for many years. 
 Dr. E B. Pusey, was standing for
 
 1834 RESIDENCE AT OXFORD 23 
 
 papers. The City meeting to address the King conservatively 
 seems to have succeeded in spite of the interruption of all 
 speaking by some Radicals. 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 Oriel : May 2, 1835. 
 
 All the Convocation affair 2 went off most triumphantly for 
 the party who wished no change, the numbers being 459 to 57 ; 
 rather more than eight to one 3 against the Declaration. The 
 only unpleasant part is that the beaten party are excessively 
 angry, and it must be confessed that what happened to them 
 was a trial of temper. The division was in the Theatre (N.B. 
 not the play-house), and undergraduates were admitted to the 
 gallery, who took the liberty of expressing their opinion by 
 shouts &c. pretty freely. The voters (the M.A.s) were in the 
 area (which would be in a play-house the pit, but without 
 benches), and just as they were beginning to give their votes, 
 which they usually do by going up one by one to the Proctor 
 and whispering in his ear, one of the anti-reformers cried out 
 ' Non placet ' (the form of negativing) and walked to one side 
 of the Theatre. It seemed from the gallery, where I was, as 
 if the whole crowd were following him. You just saw a few 
 spots here and there stationary, in the midst of the great cur- 
 rent, and rather struggling not to be carried away in it, as 
 little bits of dirt do when you are pouring water out of a 
 basin ; and after a short settling we saw about forty gentlemen 
 left ' alone with their glory ' in the middle of the room, looking 
 very foolish, and hardly knowing whether to stand boldly forth 
 or not, to bear as best they might the shoutings of the oppo- 
 site party and the undergraduates. However, the others soon 
 took compassion on them and spread themselves again over 
 the whole area, and their only penance after that was to listen 
 to the expression of the undergraduate feelings, till the Proctor 
 had done counting the votes. It is rather curious that these 
 very young gentlemen whom people are so anxious to liberate 
 
 - On the question of releasing candi- 3 The figures here are consistent. 
 
 I dates for matriculation from subscription In Church's Oxford Movement the 
 
 to the Thirty-nine Articles (see note majority is said to have been five to 
 
 on page 21). one.
 
 24 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. n 
 
 * 
 
 from the yoke of subscription are the most vehement and 
 noisy opponents of any ' relief bill ' that are to be found. I 
 only wish they had confined themselves to applause, whereas 
 they took the liberty of hissing our respectable Provost, who 
 is the great patron of change. Of course we have been inun- 
 dated with pamphlets, with and without names. . . . 
 
 In the meantime I certainly had a very pleasant two days. 
 Wilson, Ryder, Wilberforce, Harding, spent several days here, 
 with a quantity of other contemporaries, and Hurrell Froude 
 arrived just in time from Barbadoes to cut into the middle of it. 
 It quite surprises me how little people change. All these gentry, 
 married and single, were so exactly what they always had 
 been, that I could hardly believe I was not a freshman again. 
 The only painful thing was that I fear Barbadoes has not 
 done much for Froude. I was quite shocked to see him, but 
 I suppose I had been too sanguine ; his wretched thinness 
 struck me more than it had ever done. They say, however, 
 that no one ever gains flesh in the West Indies, but that it 
 tells when they come back. I most earnestly trust it may be 
 so. He talks of spending the winter at Rome again, going 
 straight there and coming straight back. He certainly cannot 
 spend it in England. I cannot describe the kind of sickness 
 I felt in looking at him when just the first meeting was over. 
 I suppose it is a hopeful sign that his spirits are just as high 
 as they always were ; at least were so when he first came here, 
 for I am afraid we must look for a change in that, as Newman 
 tells me he has heard to-day that his sister who was so ill is 
 given over ; I have not seen him since his hearing the news. 
 HoweveT,' I am getting mopish. 
 
 Yours most affectionately, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS. 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 Oriel : October 25, 1835. 
 
 My dear Katherine, Many thanks for your letter. I did 
 for some time delay writing till the Queen >^vas gone, and 
 since that employments and engagements ancf calls came one 
 on another so as to put my writing off two or three days
 
 1835 RESIDENCE AT OXFORD 25 
 
 longer. The results of the audit were, as I expected, not very 
 satisfactory, the Fellowships making rather a poor show in 
 consequence of all the low prices &c. that farmers com- 
 plain of. 
 
 So much for the Fellowship. The Queen 4 has been well 
 received, and seems to have made a very favourable im- 
 pression. The precise amount of illuminations, dinners, &c., 
 you will find in the papers far better than I can tell you. 
 Everybody went to a drawing-room, which she held at the 
 Angel, to show their loyalty, and I among the rest. The poor 
 Dean of Christ Church 5 has got into more general odium 
 than ever by mismanaging his part of the matter so as not to 
 have the Queen at Christ Church. There are various versions 
 of the story, most people putting it down to some incivility 
 or brusquerie in his way of offering his house, which is likely 
 enough, as he is a man who speaks and writes rather too 
 shortly for court etiquettes. The most unfavourable account 
 is that he wrote to Lord Howe that there was such and 
 such a number of rooms unoccupied in his house which Her 
 Majesty might have ; the most favourable, and, I believe, the 
 true one, that he wrote to say that his own house and two of 
 the Canons' houses were at Her Majesty's service, but that 
 they would require some putting in order and consequently 
 some time. However, the Queen could not wait, and in con- 
 sequence went to the Angel Inn ; probably he did it clumsily. 
 Be that as it may, he bears the whole blame, and, I fancy, is 
 extremely vexed and annoyed. The Duke of Wellington 
 lionised her, and seemed in great force. 
 
 Newman is, of course, come back bringing as good an ac- 
 count of Froude 6 as could be expected. He seems quite sta- 
 tionary ; the lungs certainly are not affected, and he has strength 
 enough to have thrown off quite the attack he had in August. 
 His father says that his being with him has done him good, 
 by keeping up his spirits, and he seems very much to long 
 after his Oxford friends. Newman has pledged himself to 
 Froude that somebody shall go down to him at Christmas ; 
 
 4 Queen Adelaide. house, the rectory at Dartington, in 
 
 5 Dean Gaisford. South Devon. 
 
 6 Hurrell Froude was at his father's 

 
 26 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. n 
 
 and wants me to do it, which I should very much like, and 
 half think of doing ; however, we can talk of that when I 
 come home in November. 
 
 Miss P.'s admiration, Samuel Wilberforce, with his wife, 
 has passed through here, and hopes to see me in the Isle of 
 Wight if I go that way. Also I have just been hearing her 
 great friend Moberly preach two admirable University sermons, 
 in the anti-Evangelical line. He and Wordsworth will be a 
 great gain to them at Winchester. I am only sorry we lose 
 him here. Keble is married, but I cannot hear of any further 
 chance of - *s success, so that we^ shall, I suppose, only 
 have two vacant Fellowships next Easter. The elder Mozley 7 
 is here to reside, and I think I shall get on with him better 
 than I expected. I had fancied him less of a sociable animal 
 than he is ; he talks, I see, a great deal, and cleverly, though in 
 a peculiar line which would not be generally interesting. 
 Doyle is here to stand for All Souls, and Vaughan and 
 Harrison and Liddell to stay the term. By the way, it was, 
 I believe, attempted to get up a town and gown row in 
 honour of the Queen's visit, but there was a difficulty about it 
 from their being at that moment both on the same side, and 
 the thing dropped rather dead ; nothing but the breaking of 
 one ' snob's ' head for frightening horses with crackers. As 
 for us, we set our tower on fire in Her Majesty's honour, but, 
 as she left Oxford just as the fire (which was in the chimney) 
 began to burn up, we thought we might as well put it out 
 again, which we did at our leisure. The chimney which the 
 porter chose for lighting, besides affording singular facilities 
 for such a manoeuvre from being (in parts) never swept, be- 
 longed to the room in which all our deeds, leases, account 
 books, &c., are kept, which would have placed our illumina- 
 tion far beyond any one's else, at any rate in expensiveness. 
 
 To Rev. J. H. Newman, 
 
 Bridehead : January 16, 1836. 
 
 My dear Newman, I have just left Froude, who pro- 
 fesses to remain" much as he has been, rather weaker than 
 
 7 Mr. Thomas Mozley, whose 'Reminiscences' were published in 1882 and 
 1885. He married a sister of Newman.
 
 1836 RESIDENCE AT OXFORD 27 
 
 when you were with him, from never being in the open air r 
 but not worse than he has been from the beginning of his 
 confinement. I am afraid, too, he is not quite in so good 
 spirits as he used to be. Perhaps that was so when you were 
 down. You ought to send Harrison down to him to ^take 
 lessons on the subject of the Reformers, for certainly he has 
 a way of speaking which carries conviction in a most extra- 
 ordinary manner, over and above the arguments he uses. 8 
 
 Coming through Exeter and being too late for a coach, I 
 had the very good luck to meet Dornford, 9 who has by this 
 time written to the College to resign his Fellowship, not 
 that he was bound by the letter of the Statute, but he felt 
 convinced that Adam de Brome ' did not intend his benefaction 
 for persons situated like him. (i) Dornford (on that occa- 
 sion) meeting Wilson's brother-in-law, Major Blanshard, did 
 in the course of conversation say that he considered himself 
 now as a married man. Major B. thereupon congratulated, 
 asked when the day was. D. responded that ' he was married 
 to his church ; his church was and would be his only wife.' 
 B. hoped he did not entertain Roman Catholic views. ' Oh ! 
 no, no, it is from the high opinion I entertain of the ladles 
 that I shall remain a bachelor. I consider a wife as a luxury, 
 not a necessary. If I thought it a necessary, I should get 
 one.' 
 
 He then walked about Exeter with me for about an hour 
 and a half, talking of the Peninsular War, upon which he said 
 his mind fell back much more than on his Oriel life, or than it 
 used to do while he was at Oriel. And this leads me to (2). 
 Dornford being engaged in puffing the military profession 
 and his own military life to Major B., the said Major B. 
 pointed out that he at any rate was now in a line more satis- 
 factory in the highest respects. ' Ah ! no, no, I am not so 
 sure of that ; it is very gratifying and remarkable to observe 
 
 8 It should be observed that there life served in the Peninsular War. 
 
 are expressions in this letter and others ' The original founder of Oriel Col- 
 
 of about the same date, implying a lege (in 1324) was Adam de Brome, 
 
 disapproval of many of the principles Almoner of Edward II. and Rector of 
 
 of the Reformers which was not endorsed St. Mary's, Oxford (RashdalPs Univer- 
 
 by Lord Blachford's later judgment. sities of Europe, ii. 492). 
 
 9 A Fellow of Oriel who had in earlier
 
 28 
 
 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD 
 
 CH. II 
 
 the satisfactory way in which the military profession is spoken 
 of in Scripture whenever it occurs, " the centurion who," &c. 
 It is a very remarkable contrast with the lawyers, who, you 
 will observe, are never introduced without a sentence of 
 reprobation.' 
 
 Did Froude tell you that some good lady, who has read 
 you, wonders how it is that you and Arnold should have any 
 difference between you (as seems to be the case from a note 
 on one of your sermons), ' your sentiments and general tone 
 so perfectly agreeing, as your respective sermons show them 
 to do ' ? 
 
 I hear of a certain Mr. Glover, who is a very high Church- 
 man too much so, and too political for the people here. 
 He has been dunning Williams to propose a repeal of the 
 Pr&mnnire, talking about the glory of the English Senator 
 who should make the first step in freeing the Church. Do 
 you know who, or what, he is ? I shall try to find out. 
 Williams is to give him a volume of Oxford Tracts. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS. 
 ^ j 
 
 I heard the other day that you were sure to be a bishop. 
 
 - * . . 
 
 To Miss M. Rogers. 
 
 Oriel : March 30, 1836. 
 
 I did not give you much of an account of Hampden's 
 Convocation, 2 and there was not much to say, as it was 
 
 2 Dr. Hampden was supposed to 
 have used words in his Bampton Lec- 
 tures which allowed no authority to 
 anything that depended upon decrees 
 of the Church and not directly upon the 
 words of Scripture no authority there- 
 fore per se to Creeds or Articles. This 
 at least was held to be the logical con- 
 clusion of his teaching. On this 
 account his appointment by the Crown 
 to the post of Regius Professor of 
 Divinity was strongly disapproved of, 
 not only by the ' Tractarians ' at 
 Oxford, but also by Evangelicals ; and 
 
 side attacks, which few, if any, would 
 now defend, were made upon his 
 authority. Among them was a pro- 
 posal, submitted by heads of houses to 
 Convocation, that Dr. Hampden should 
 not be allowed a voice in the appoint- 
 ment of Select Preacher to the Univer- 
 sity. This proposal was defeated by 
 the veto of the Proctors in March 1836, 
 but in May of the same year it was 
 brought forward again and was passed 
 by 474 to 94 (see Oxford Movement, 
 pp. 1 39-1 si).
 
 1836 RESIDENCE AT OXFORD 29 
 
 almost the same as the affair of the Articles. We had a good 
 many friends up, and were very comfortable and glad to meet ;: 
 most of them stayed a day or two, which made it almost worth 
 while for them to come for pleasure, and we bedded them all 
 in College. To many, of course, the Proctors' veto must have 
 been most provoking. But really (barring the inconvenience 
 to non-residents) I should not myself be very sorry. The 
 more the matter is thought of, the more I hope people will 
 see the absurdity of allowing all the King's Church Patronage 
 to be distributed by a premier, who may be himself infidel, 
 heretic, or anything else. The Proctors did not give out their 
 intentions at all till Saturday afternoon, and then not in a 
 way which seemed to be against their retracting, and not 
 putting on their veto in case they should find themselves in a 
 majority. I do not think they meant it unfairly, but they did 
 not pledge themselves to act certainly one way or the other, 
 and of course nothing less than a distinct pledge would have 
 made it safe for us to countermand the voters on our side. 
 And indeed we could not possibly have countermanded those 
 beyond London, for on Saturday there was no post through 
 London, and consequently no letter could reach people beyond 
 town that way till Tuesday morning, long before which time 
 they would have left home, as on Tuesday at 2 o'clock the 
 Convocation met. The requisition to the Vice-Chancellor 
 which I sent you received about 380 signatures, which are, I 
 believe, to appear in print. Some left by mistake before 
 signing, and very many indeed were prevented from coming 
 up by the rumours about the Proctor's intentions, so that it is 
 sure to come on again next term. At the last moment, when 
 it was quite clear that we should be vetoed, a rather important 
 question arose, whether the Proctors' veto stopped proceedings, 
 or only nullified them (as the King's refusing assent to a bill 
 in Parliament), or, in other words, whether the veto was inter- 
 posed before the ' division ' or after, and, to the surprise of all 
 persons present, a Mr. Vaughan Thomas, a very grandiloquent 
 and pompous gentleman, chairman of our meeting, as the 
 question was about to be put, started off at score with a long 
 Latin speech to show that they could not prevent us from 
 dividing, which, could he have got his point, would have
 
 3 o LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. n 
 
 almost made the veto a dead letter, as the division would have 
 been in itself a declaration of the opinion of the University. 
 However, the Latin produced not the smallest effect. When the 
 question was put and the Proctors gave their ' non placet,' 
 the V.C. got up, dissolved Convocation, and was halfway out 
 before any one knew what was going on. There was a due 
 proportion of noise, especially from the undergraduates, who 
 I hope will not be let in again on a similar occasion. All 
 hands then adjourned to Brasenose Common Room, where 
 some very bad speeches were made by one or two people who 
 came from town, Lord Encombe and a Mr. Trevor ; elec- 
 tioneering kind of claptrap speeches, quite out of place, and 
 the requisitions, which had been prepared before by sensible 
 people, proposed, carried, and signed. The names, I fancy, 
 are to appear in the ' Standard.' And there the matter has 
 ended for the present. I hear the ' Morning Chronicle ' has 
 had an attack on Newman and Pusey by name, for being at 
 the bottom of it. 
 
 To Rev. J. H. Newman. 
 
 Eliot Place : July 2, 1836. 
 
 My dear Newman, Wood is most sanguine, and eager to 
 know every one who holds out prospect of being bettered. He 
 nods his head and says, ' Do you know, Rogers, I do not see 
 why we should not absorb all young Evangelicals.' This 
 
 a propos of , on whom we are to call together, sv ysvoiro. 
 
 Wood is eager for controversy with people, and his sine qtia 
 non for thinking them promising is an anxiety to discuss and 
 argue the questions : which he will find in Palmer. He is 
 most warm in his expressions of affection for Bowden. What 
 a hit you have made there ! He hardly ever sees him, he 
 says, without finding out something fresh to like in him. 
 
 ... I have set to work fairly this week at attending Courts. 
 One great gain will be that it will bring me very much across 
 Wood ; he lets me sit in his room when I am tired of hearing 
 arguments in Court, and tells me what to read, and lectures 
 me. How long this will please him I do not know. I hope 
 and trust I shall not bore him, and it is consoling to think
 
 1836 RESIDENCE AT OXFORD 31 
 
 that he will probably tell me when I do. In the meantime 
 this does not agree very well with [the review of] Bentham, I 
 confess ; but I hope that if the ' British Critic ' does not come 
 out till near the end of the month I may have got through 
 something or other by that time. 
 
 . . . What do you think of doing about the Lyral If I 
 could be of any use I should be very glad and should like it 
 much, i.e. in case you have not time, and can find no better 
 person. 3 I hardly know it all at present, and so should start 
 at a disadvantage compared with many men^ And "I know, 
 too, that I am not up to half your meanings in different places, 
 but still I might save you trouble, and you might talk to me 
 about a general arrangement when you come here, and polish 
 it up afterwards. If you have any one in your eye (Mozley, 
 e.g.} who will answer the purpose better, and will do it, so 
 much the better. Tell me when you are likely to come, or if 
 you are likely to be prevented. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 F. R. 
 
 To Miss M. Rogers. 
 
 Hursley : August 14, 1836. 
 
 My dear Marian, I have had a variety of good and bad 
 luck since I have been here. In the first place my journey 
 was very prosperous. It was, as you know, a fine day, and I 
 was not dreadfully crowded in the coach, though very nearly 
 so. We had one very fat man sitting outside, on the same 
 bench with me ; fortunately we were not full at starting, so 
 that we were able to allow him two places to his own proper 
 share, without any inconvenience to ourselves. But, as we 
 went on, it was only the obvious physical impossibility of the 
 case, as pointed out calmly and impressively by the fat man, 
 
 3 Arranging and editing the Lyra from the British [Magazine] with 
 
 Apostolica. In Newman's answer to Lyras in them. What I should like 
 
 this letter on July 5 (Correspondence, ii. you to do (unless my proposal goes be- 
 
 199), he says : ' Thanks for your offer yond your offer) would be to get a 
 
 about the Lyra ; your"*~assTs"tance will blank quarto book and paste them in. 
 
 be everything. I have told Rivington ... I should wish the series to begin 
 
 you will call for any loose sheets he has with Scripture subjects.'
 
 32 . LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. n 
 
 which prevented the coachman from intruding a fourth person 
 (for whom the coach was in any ordinary state of things 
 calculated) on our bench. The fat man's mode of argument 
 was truly irresistible. Just as the coach stopped, we all saw 
 what was coming, and exclaimed with one voice to the fat 
 man, ' You must fight our battle, sir.' He accordingly com- 
 posed himself into the attitude of a candid man, aware that 
 his specific gravity defies all attempts to turn him out, ready 
 to do anything that can in reason be expected of him, but 
 with no thoughts of making room for a fourth passenger. As 
 the coachman with the expectant came up, he began looking 
 to one and the other side of him as if to see where it was that 
 the coachman would expect to put him ; and answered his 
 ' Now, sir, if you please,' with ' Quite impossible you see, 
 my friend, it's quite impossible. Do what you will, you can 
 not get me into less than this ' and then he put his two 
 hands at the distance of about a yard and a half asunder, to 
 those points in the bench where his body terminated on each 
 side ; and all with the innocent tone of a man who was trying 
 to stretch (or rather contract) a point for the coachman, if in 
 any way possible. And the perplexing thing was that what 
 he said was so undeniably true. It was perfectly vain to talk 
 of its being ' a very unbusinesslike way of doing things, to 
 lose a passenger because one gentleman happened to be a 
 little stouter (a singular understatement of our argument) than 
 the rest,' while the solid and unyielding fact was what it was. 
 And coachee was obliged to carry off the passenger to sit 
 third on the box ; leaving our friend grumbling on ' quite 
 impossible ' with the complaining air of a goodnatured man 
 whom people have attempted to put upon. We had previously 
 ascertained that he only paid for one place. 
 
 Keble is at Freshwater for his wife's health, and proposed 
 my going there with him on Monday, which I did. Thursday 
 and bits of Wednesday and Friday I spent with S. Wilberforce 
 at Brighstone, and found R. Wilberforce staying for some time 
 there, and H. Wilberforce with his wife came over for a 
 day, so that all this was most lucky. Now I am back here, just 
 beginning again my visit to W T ilson. ' So far, so good, now per 
 
 4 Mr. Wilson was Mr. Keble's curate at Ilursley.
 
 1836 RESIDENCE AT OXFORD 
 
 33 
 
 contra : Keble and I, going to Cowes, in our way down seem 
 to have lost, he, his bag and great coat, I, my cloak, and a 
 small valise of Wilson's with sundry of my own clothes in it. 
 Whether these unhappy things have gone to Havre by a 
 packet which started for that place when we started for Cowes, 
 or whether a porter is now wearing my nice nankeens and 
 new silk waistcoat, the fates have not yet suffered to transpire. 
 I trust the former. Either alternative is melancholy, and one, 
 I fear, inevitable. I must say that I was so far only blame- 
 able in that I put a blind confidence in Keble, which I never 
 will do again in any man that writes verses, and that I put no 
 direction on my package, for which I the less reproach myself, 
 as his having done so seems in no degree to have alleviated 
 his fate. However, it is not, I hope, quite impossible that we 
 may see them again, and in the meantime I console myself 
 with thinking that it was not my very best coat that was in 
 it. I met Mrs.jSargent at the Wilberforces', who is a nice 
 kind of person, I should think, but I did not see much of her 
 She seemed much scandalised at R. Wilberforce for using 1 
 
 o 
 
 disparaging expressions of the Reformation ; which considered, 
 she seems to have managed ill in marrying three (at least) 
 out of her four daughters to people who would hold the 
 same objectionable language. Newman, I hear, the great 
 oracle of all four of them, she votes ' a confirmed old papist.' 
 
 To Rev. J. H. Newman, 
 
 Bransgore 5 : August 18, 1836. 
 
 My dear Newman, Ke.ble seems very little inclined to 
 send his Parochial Sermons up to you : he says ' Newman has 
 been troubled enough with reading things that won't do/ 
 However, he says, ' some time ' he will select some for publi- 
 cation himself. I have attacked him several times, and will 
 again when I go back to Hursley : which will be next 
 Thursday. I cannot get him to say anything about the 
 Church Commission article ; he says he is sure that if you are 
 not up to it, he is not, and that he supposes it wants know- 
 
 5 Mr. Henry Wilberforce at that time held the living of Bransgore, in Hamp- 
 shire. 
 
 D
 
 34 LETTERS OF .LORD BLACHFORD CH. n 
 
 ledge of law, but does not speak like a person who decidedly 
 will not do it. You are of course welcome to all the poetry 
 in the ' British Magazine.' He says he has two more Lyras for 
 you, but cannot lay his hand on them, and I cannot get any- 
 thing satisfactory out of him. Your letter only reached me 
 on Saturday evening, and H. Wilberforce took me off un- 
 expectedly to Bransgore on Wednesday, so that I have not 
 pressed for answers as I should have done. I can only say I 
 will. I talked to him about monasteries, and he asked 
 whether you had any details ready about them, and whether 
 it would not be worth while putting some people (Sir W. 
 Heathcote, e.g., he said) upon saving a little money for them 
 in case of necessity. He said he thought he would not take 
 a Bishopric, but should not feel decided enough to advise 
 a friend : and so encouraged I talked rather about the 
 Provostship, which he seemed to think quite another thing, 
 but did not pronounce (when I put the TG'TTOS before him) 
 whether it might not be embarrassing oneself with the system. 
 
 -, My own view certainly is against your declining it, unless 
 you feel that any oaths, pledges, &c., which you would have 
 to take, would be entangling. The prima facie advantages 
 
 * are so great that I cannot think you would have the oppor- 
 tunity put before you (if it is put) for nothing ; and, as to the 
 stall at Rochester, having a share of a cathedral in your hands 
 might turn out a great thing. I am sure New College 
 service is, even at present, one of the most powerful instru- 
 ments that we have at Oxford. ... 
 
 To Rev. J. H. Newman. 
 
 August 29, 1836. 
 
 My dear Newman, Keble certainly is the most impracti- 
 cable of men. I have bullied him with questions till I am 
 afraid of affronting him about the ' British Critic ' article, and 
 all I can get out of him is, that he will look at Collier : and 
 an injunction not to give you any hopes of his writing, 
 because he had disappointed you often enough already. He 
 has been at a Visitation Sermon, which he has just finished, 
 on Tradition, to be preached at a visitation of Dealtry's. He 
 talks of sending it up to you soon to look at, and at the same
 
 1836 RESIDENCE AT OXFORD 35 
 
 time a bundle of ' Village Sermons.' And this has taken up 
 most of his time lately. Indeed, since I spent some days 
 with him at Freshwater, I have hardly ever seen him for more 
 than a few minutes at a time, and that generally when he has 
 been talking with Wilson about parish business, excepting 
 one or two evenings when all his family have been with him. 
 He tells me that he hears that G. Denison goes about the 
 country puffing you and your views of things. 
 
 If there is any chance of a new edition of your ' Arians,' I ' 
 do wish you could make the Economy 6 a little more pala- 
 table ; so many people seem to me to find it hard of digestion. 
 I think I told you long ago that it was the point on which 
 Twisleton fastened, and I hear that Sir W. Heathcote, who 
 people say is a clever man, and I suppose a well-principled, "' 
 has need of all his respect for you and apostolicity to help 
 him to stomach it at all. 
 
 To Miss S. Rogers. 
 
 August 1836. 
 
 I suppose people at home have told you all the news that 
 was to be told before I left home. In the first place I had a 
 very prosperous and amusing journey to Winchester. The 
 amusing feature of it was an inordinately fat man who 
 occupied the place next to me ; .but having already given an 
 account of the same in a letter home I will not serve you up 
 the same dish, but will only say that this morning, looking at 
 the paper, I perceived that on Lablache and some other 
 singers presenting themselves to get places in the Southampton 
 (the same) coach, the book-keeper declined taking Lablache 
 
 6 ' The principle of the Economy is of His Will. ... It may be said that 
 ; this : that out of various courses, in this principle, true in itself, yet is dan- 
 religious conduct or statement, all and gerous, because it admits of an easy 
 each allowable antecedently and in them- abuse, and carries men away into what 
 selves, that ought to be taken which is becomes insincerity and cunning. This 
 most expedient and most suitable at the is undeniable ; to do evil that good 
 time for the object in hand. Instances may come, to consider that the means, 
 of its application and exercise in Scrip- whatever they are, justify the end, to 
 ture are such as the following : ( i ) sacrifice truth to expedience, unscrupu- 
 Divine Providence did but gradually lousness, recklessness, are grave offences, 
 impart to the world in general, and to These are the abuses of Economy ' 
 the Jews in particular, the knowledge (Apologia, p. 343).
 
 36 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. n 
 
 unless he would pay for two places. It seems the omission 
 of that precaution in the case of our fat friend had made them 
 wiser. 
 
 I never saw so much of Keble before, and am delighted to 
 have done so now. I spent the whole days from Monday to 
 Saturday with his family (except two which I spent with 
 Samuel Wilberforce), and came home to Hursley with them, 
 and most delightful people they all are most certainly. I 
 never could have conceived a person keeping as Keble does 
 his boyish spirits, till I had seen him pelting his young nephew 
 in to his lessons in the most reckless way. At the same time 
 /am very much afraid of him, I confess, from not being able 
 quite to understand him always, or to make myself always 
 understood by him, and in talking of serious subjects he has 
 a disconcerting way of keeping silence sometimes, which may 
 mean either that he thinks you have been over forward and 
 are talking sillily, or that what you say is new to him and he 
 has no answer to make. I sometimes wonder how two men 
 so very unlike as Newman and he could have got to under- 
 stand one another so perfectly as they do. I suppose they 
 hardly could have done so unless they had had Froude as an 
 interpreter at first. Mrs. Keble I have been more taken with 
 than any one I have met for a very long time indeed. She is so 
 weak and ill that she rests (in walking) every thirty or forty 
 yards, but never takes any one little privilege of an invalid, 
 and is constantly exerting herself to keep all round her 
 cheerful and in good spirits, and that with so little of the 
 manner of a weak person that it is not for some time that 
 you see that it is an exertion. There is something certainly 
 inexpressibly taking in seeing a person who has a right to be 
 lying idle on a sofa, paying the sharpest attention to the little 
 comforts of every one present ; at the same time it is most 
 painful to see how very ill she is. One evening in particular, 
 
 after I had just heard of the death of Mrs. (which you 
 
 have probably seen in the papers), I felt it quite sickening to 
 look at her talking pleasantly and looking after every one's 
 cups of tea, and seeming all the time so pale and weak that 
 one felt that almost every word she spoke livelily was an 
 imprudent exertion.
 
 1836 RESIDENCE AT OXFORD 37 
 
 To Mrs. Rogers. 
 
 Bransgore : September 18, 1836. 
 
 My dear Mother, I left Keble's finally on Thursday, 
 which is the place I certainly have left with most regret of 
 any, the whole party, besides their other likeable qualities, 
 being so kind and glad to see you, and intimate. Mrs. Keble 
 hopes much to see any of my sisters who may happen to be 
 in this part of the world ; this she volunteered, and repeated 
 several times that I must understand her to be in earnest, 
 and not take the invitation as a matter of compliment, which 
 I said I should do. 
 
 Tell Marian I have been unhappy enough to recommend 
 the ' Stabat Mater ' to Mrs. Wilberforce, the consequence of 
 which has been that there has come from the Southampton 
 music shop the music indeed, but set to regular Evangelical 
 English words, t\\epertransivit gladius stanza being put to the 
 following words (by way of a specimen) : 
 
 Mercy's streams I here am viewing 
 Precious drops my soul bedewing 
 
 Plead and claim my peace with God. ! ! I 
 
 I have tried what I could do, by supplying most of the right 
 words, to give the poor music a fair chance, but against such 
 ludicrous mangling I am afraid I can scarcely hope to suc- 
 ceed. And tell her likewise that some choruses (gipsy chiefly) 
 in the ' Preciosa ' are perfectly beautiful, and it will be worth 
 her while trying it. Mrs. Keble played it to me from a P.F. 
 setting of some nobody's. 
 
 I think I told you that I half expected Acland to join 
 us in our Normandy expedition. He will be "a great acquisi- 
 tion, both for other reasons and as a sketcher, one of which 
 article it is highly desirable to have in a party. I hope too 
 that Wilson will pass through Boulogne while I am there/on 
 his way home from Switzerland.
 
 38 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. n 
 
 To Miss E. Rogers. 
 
 St. Heller's, Jersey : September 24, 1836. 
 
 My dear Emily, When last T wrote to you I think it 
 was from H. Wilberforce's. While there I received intimation 
 that Newman's consecration 7 was on the 22nd, the day after 
 we had intended to start H. W., my host, and Mrs. H. W., 
 had promised to be there, and there was altogether to be a 
 party. Accordingly Mr. and Mrs. H. W. and myself started 
 from Bransgore on Tuesday, slept at Hursley (I at Wilson's 
 in his absence), and had a pleasant journey to Oxford and 
 a very pleasant party there. Newman's church, now finished, 
 is certainly one of the most perfect things for its size I ever 
 saw, The altar is beautiful, and the rest is so well kept under 
 that when you come in you seem to see nothing but the altar ; 
 never certainly was anything so unlike modern churches. 
 The builders &c. are extremely puzzled at the capricious and 
 unseemly (as to them appears) way in which his ornament is 
 spent ; no cushions in the armchairs by the side of the altar, 
 mere rush hassocks for the priest to kneel on there ; no 
 cushion to support the prayer-book on the altar ; no cushions 
 or hangings on the pulpit at a//, and instead of a reading-desk, 
 the kind of stand that a person plays the violin before, with a 
 bran hassock to kneel on when necessary ; while the altar 
 itself was carved stone, with seven very pretty Early English 
 arches behind it, surmounted by a three-lighted window in the 
 style of those of Christ Church Chapter-house ; all very 
 expensive. 
 
 We were all in fear as to what the Bishop would say ; in 
 the first place, stone altar, and in the second crosses over : 
 these are papistical, and Newman we thought was a person 
 who could not look over a hedge &c. ; moreover, so was the 
 ceremony of priests turning to the east to" say the prayers, 
 which was to be essayed nevertheless ; moreover, there was 
 no vestry for the Bishop to robe in, and the pulpit was even 
 illegally destitute of appurtenances. However, his Lordship 
 was highly pleased and complimentary, and everything went 
 
 7 The consecration of Newman's church at Littlemore, near Oxford.
 
 1836 RESIDENCE AT OXFORD 39 
 
 off in the greatest style. Williams, 8 whom my sisters know of, 
 is the curate. 
 
 After a very jolly day and a half at Oxford I started at 
 8 o'clock by the Southampton coach, extremely disgusted to 
 find, with the fear of the equinox before our eyes, that the 
 wind was getting up and that we should be wet through by 
 the time we reached Southampton, and be miserable all our 
 passage. However, we stopped (again) at Keble's and made 
 him give us victuals and dry our wet thinggTSnd lodged our- 
 selves in tolerable comfort on the Jersey steamer at 7 o'clock 
 P.M. on Friday, September 23, 1836, with a good sharp S.W. 
 wind blowing, and with the swell consequent on what had 
 blown through the day. Till we got to the Needles, as a look 
 at the map will point out to you, everything was delightful, 
 except that everybody knew what they had to look forward 
 to ; and I have seldom seen anything more beautiful than the 
 Needles were by moonlight with clouds flying about the tops 
 of the cliffs. And indeed the whole passage by the north of 
 the Isle of Wight was beautiful in the same way from the 
 quantity of white clouds, the skirts of which seemed to be hang- 
 ing over the hills with breaks here and there and a full moon 
 every now and then. At the Needles the sharp pitching sent 
 everybody down to bed like a shot. / myself walked about 
 deck for some time longer, and never felt less unwell, or more 
 like a god in my life ; walking down a ship as it is descend- 
 ing a wave seems to me (next to skating) the nearest approach 
 to flying that is given to man. 
 
 To Rev. J. H. Newman. 
 
 Boulogne-sur-Mer : October 10, 1836. 
 
 My dear Newman, I write just to say that I certainly 
 intend to be at Oxford on Saturday night, or rather Sunday 
 morning, by the mail. My plans are to come to London by 
 a packet which leaves this at twelve on Friday night and 
 professes to cross in about twelve hours. So that I shall have 
 just an hour or two, I hope, at home, and then pass on to you 
 
 8 Mr. Isaac Williams (see below, p. 107).
 
 40 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. H 
 
 people at Oxford. Our tour has been very successful, in spite 
 of some small impediments to our perfect happiness in the 
 shape of bad weather and unwholesome French living. I 
 certainly seem to have attained to some few fresh ideas on 
 the subject of Gothic architecture how wonderfully beautiful 
 some of the cathedrals are ! I confess I do not attain to a 
 distinct view about their services, music, &c. ; in fact, gene- 
 rally speaking, I was not much struck. However, not under- 
 standing what is going on, and being occupied in a search 
 through one's Missal to find the place during the greater part 
 of the service, interfere somewhat, as well with your perception 
 of beauties and proprieties, as with other things. 
 
 The priests seem not to be much respected by the class of 
 people one meets in diligences, and to have lost entirely their 
 hold on the national education. I travelled with a boy who is 
 at one of the Government Colleges, and I should fancy that 
 the French system had as great capabilities of becoming a 
 magnificent, flourishing, anti-Christian system as can well be 
 conceived. Are we to come to this ? Or will the two uni- 
 versities save us ? Like Acland, I think you ought to put 
 forth something positive, and don't know what. 
 
 However, I shall see you within a week, so I need not 
 have any compunction at sending you a short note like this 
 merely to tell you to have rooms ready for me particularly 
 as it is at your command that I make my appearance. Kind 
 remembrances to all at Oriel. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS. 
 
 To Rev. J. H. Newman. 
 
 Eliot Place : February 1837. 
 
 My dear Newman, I was, as you seemed to forebode, 
 knocked up with the influenza the day but one after I received 
 your letter. I suppose""you have forgotten what you wrote to 
 me about ; however, I shall assume that you remember. I 
 cannot really judge about a title for your book ; I have not 
 the book enough in my head ; probably have not heard 
 enough of it to know what title would be appropriate. I
 
 1837 RESIDENCE AT OXFORD 
 
 should, e.g., not have thought that the Pastoral Office, &c., was 
 the subject of your book. 9 
 
 S. Wilberforce, I believe, was not attacked at Islington ; 
 on the contrary, he wanted to get an opportunity of speaking 
 at Bramston's special desire, but could not. Archdeacon 
 Hoare gave you all up but Keble, and could not consent to 
 call ' the great Keble a heretic.' I hear generally they find 
 now that the ' Christian Year ' contains all evil hidden in it. 
 Archdeacon H. considers that Keble and himself are the two 
 most sympathetic souls in the diocese of Winton. Do you 
 know him ? By the way, I dined with Sir R. Inglis to meet 
 Thornton the other day, and met Rose/Southey, and one of 
 the Coleridges, which last talked of Arnold, who, he said, 
 stated to friends that his fingers itched to review Keble's 
 * Hooker,' but that he did not do it on account of their old 
 friendship. He said Arnold considered Keble as quite the 
 leader and representative of Church views. Rose, I thought, 
 seemed very much down in the mouth perhaps it was only 
 that he expected Southey to exhibit which he did not. He 
 hardly said anything, except that he abused Arnold for 
 imputing to people (old friends of his own) what he must 
 have known to be false motives. . . . 
 
 Townshend of Durham told somebody that, dining with 
 Rose, he had for a long time had great difficulty in containing 
 himself, and at last Rose said that he thought it very doubtful 
 whether we had got more good or evil from the Reformation . 
 ' Then,' he said, ' I could stand it no more, so I rose and 
 gave it him, hip and thigh.' 
 
 Can I be of any use in translating for the Fathers ? * I 
 have been thinking over it, and if I could be of use shall be 
 glad to be so. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS. 
 
 :. 
 
 Romanism and Popular Prates- lated 'by Members of 'the English Church, 
 tantism, published in 1837. edited by Newman, Keble, and Pusey. 
 
 The Library of the Fathers, trans-
 
 42 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. n 
 
 To Rev. J. H. Neivman. 
 
 University Club : April 27, 1837. 
 
 My dear Newman, I never thought very much of my 
 tract suggestion, but Wood brought some objections to a 
 pamphlet which did not apply to them, so I suggested them. 
 The said Wood states first, that he does not remember, and 
 . does not believe, that you ever commissioned him to write to 
 Manning about the Optatus. 2 Secondly, that he did say to 
 
 S. Wllberforce that it was idle of H. W. to have thrown 
 
 _ 
 
 up the Confessions : and will never again say a word to one 
 Wilberforce about another but that he was led astray by 
 your having written to him to ask him to suggest some 
 translator for the Confessions H. W. having taken the 
 Letters. 3 That, therefore, as he has only done you one dis- 
 service, and since you count his letter as a service, he con- 
 siders himself quits with you. 
 
 I see Hope twice a week, and really he seems both a very 
 nice fellow, and very well inclined to go thoroughly with us. 
 Jeremy Taylor, as far as I can see, seems his great man. It 
 is rather absurd to see how many people take Sewell's ground 
 quite believing your people to be the right set but think- 
 ing that they individually are more likely to be useful to right 
 views by not being party men. 
 
 Vaughan, I hear, is gone to Hampstead to think out 
 principles, and has joined to himself Twisleton. The account 
 I heard from one of the Denisons was that he said he had 
 taken his views for some tfme on authority, and wanted to 
 satisfy himself for himself. 
 
 You do not tell me how I am to get an Ambrose to 
 translate from. I told Acland you liked his article, and had 
 a long talk with him about Maurice. I was amused at your 
 respective ways of putting the same fact. You complained 
 of Pusey's being sacrificed to a theory. Acland said that it 
 was Maurice's very admiration for Pusey which made him 
 select him as the best and most living specimen he could get 
 of the English High Church view of the Sacraments. 
 
 2 I.e. a proposal that he should 3 The translation of St. Augustine's 
 
 translate the writings of Optatus of Confessions and of St. Cyprian's 
 Milevi against the Donatists. Letters.
 
 1837 RESIDENCE AT OXFORD 43 
 
 To Rev. J. H. Newman. 
 
 May 31, 1837. 
 
 Carissime N., I am afraid it is vain to hope that my 
 sister wilt" recover. The physicians say just what they used 
 to do about Froude. . . . 
 
 Wood has just spoken to me about Froude's ' Remains/ 
 As far as I have an opinion I should say with him, publish 
 them as soon as they are ready : unless, of course, there is 
 anything which, on consideration, he as a clergyman of the 
 Church of England had no right to publish. I cannot help 
 feeling as if his death was a kind of call to publish them now. 
 Perhaps (or I may say certainly) I should have thought it 
 bad policy to publish them so soon, if circumstances had not 
 pointed that way ; for I am not so ready as Wood to throw 
 away your character for judgment and moderation ; I hope it 
 may serve you and Oxford many a good turn yet. But, as it 
 is, I should go quo fata vocant. 
 
 How far does Froude's view of the Eucharist go beyond 
 what Knox's implies, where he speaks of the consecrated 
 elements being to us ' all and more than all ' that the 
 Shechinah was to the Jews ? If not much, will it be so very 
 startling to people at large ? 
 
 Our clergyman here (Legge of All Souls 4 ) seems edging 
 forwards towards daily service : last year he had it on Saints* 
 days then in Lent on Wednesdays and Fridays, and now 
 every week on Tuesdays, Wednesdays, and Fridays, and 
 Saints' days. Wood tells me Dodsworth is to have his 
 church always open, really for the benefit of poor people who 
 live two or three families in one room. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 F. R. 
 
 To Rev. J. H. Newman: 1 
 
 Eliot Place : July 3, 1837. 
 
 I confess myself a good deal at a loss and rather anxious 
 to know accurately what is the state of things ; which, con- 
 
 4 Hon. and Rev. Henry Legge, 5 Newman's answer to this (dated 
 
 Vicar of Blackheath. He married a July 5) is printed in Letters and Cor- 
 sister of Frederic Rogers in 1842. respondence, ii. 237.
 
 44 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. n 
 
 sidering my oath to obey, I certainly have not been diligent 
 in informing myself of. If I were to come up at the Audit 
 a few days before the rest, should I be able to get hold of the 
 Statute Book and make up something of one's mind quietly 
 beforehand ? I really should like to hear a little what your 
 view of things is, if it is not troubling you. Is this heretical ? 
 The statutes about Prayer for the Founder, qud statutes, 
 are repealed by the Act of Parliament and Convocation which 
 made it wrong to obey them ; we do not swear to them ; 
 they are not statutes ; but they should be kept in the Book, 
 (i) as monuments of our benefactors' intention, binding as 
 such on all of us, as far as we can rightly observe them (or 
 \qul\ substitute something for them), a guide to such as wish 
 to do so, and possibly a still more literal and exact guide to 
 future and better times : (2) (if there is nothing really per se 
 wrong in them, which you know best) as existing still in posse 
 and liable to be called into life at any moment, if Convocation 
 (qu. and Parliament ?) repealed those of their laws which make 
 it wrong to obey them literally at present. Then as to the 
 ' eloquio fruantur Latino ' and such like which are part of our 
 present statutes, I should be glad to see them got rid of, for 
 Lord Radnor's reasons. 
 
 Have pity on me and tell me how much of this is absurd. 
 For, in spite of all you may say to the contrary, it is pleasant 
 for a weak conscience to be able to refer one's actions to a 
 rational principle. Don't treat me Wilsonice for this. 
 
 I met and talked with Ward of Balliol the other day at the 
 Club, and was rather pleased with his way of talking, not that 
 we talked at all on Catholic subjects ; but he talked (as 
 Marriott says) like a man in earnest, who wished to see how 
 he ought to act. The Balliol people in their petition to 
 Parliament have asserted that they can alter their statutes ; 
 but they have since found that they cannot, which discovery 
 seems to have perplexed him in many ways. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS.
 
 1837 RESIDENCE AT OXFORD 45 
 
 To Rev. J. If. Newman. 
 
 Eliot Place : August 30, 1837. 
 
 I have been setting to work (on Dr. Doyle's recommenda- 
 tion partly) to read Isaiah, which I mention in order to- 
 acknowledge the benefit conferred on all such readers by 
 your sermons on the Kingdom of the Saints, and your view 
 of Prophecy as a record of God's (partly frustrated) intentions, 
 I cannot say how your notions seem to make everything fall 
 into order to me, and what a meaning they give to what 
 otherwise would have been to me only poetry. They seem to 
 me to grow into a key to every fresh prophecy. 
 
 How kind the ' Dublin Review ' is to you, ' amiable young 
 man,' and what a ' floor ' its defence of Dr. Wiseman from 
 your charge of unfairness is ! Wood seems rather penetrated 
 by its (and his own) arguments against Keble's Rule of Faith. 
 He complains that you and Keble tax his faith too hardly,, 
 not merely requiring him to believe generally that the Fathers 
 assert the subordination of Tradition^ which he would readily 
 do (though his own knowledge went the other way) till he 
 knew as much about them as you do ; but also that this opinion 
 of theirs is proved by certain passages which you adduce ; from 
 which passages his own reason tells him no such inference 
 can be drawn, 6 
 
 Rev. J. H. Newman. 
 
 Eliot Place : November 27, 1837. 
 
 By the bye, you know Froude used to say that neither 
 Laud nor the Reformers could be acquitted of coarseness (on 
 the ' spirit of the age ' TOTTOS). He said to me of Laud that 
 
 6 Newman in his reply (August 31) it is the heart of it. ... I wish Wood 
 says : ' Your judgment about The would put down on paper where and 
 Kingdom of the Saints is most valu- how he disagrees with me. I see no 
 able : first, because it is the first I have more than the man in the moon. All 
 had on the subject, certainly the first I have said is, that the Fathers do 
 deliberate one after a perusal of Scrip- appeal in all the controversies to Scrip- 
 ture ; next, because it is a very essential ture as a final authority ' {Letters and 
 theory in the Anglican system, indeed Correspondence, ii. 243).
 
 46 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. n 
 
 all he saw in him was that he was a brave man, with some 
 good vfews, adding that all our divines since the Reformation 
 had been very dark about Church Independence. I don't 
 know whether this is desirable to preserve in Froude's 
 , 'Remains.' 
 
 I saw Manning the other day very stout about Church 
 Commission, and generally, in fact, very respectably revolu- 
 tionist. What do you think, as a sign of the times, of his 
 introducing me to Archdeacon Hoare as a gentleman who 
 would go all lengths with him (the Archdeacon), ' a thoroughly 
 good Catholic ' ? This was taken as a full title to confidence, 
 and I was flooded with the contents of the Archdeacon's heart 
 accordingly. 
 
 And now for something which will rather amuse you. I 
 have been broaching my law-school scheme at home, which 
 seems to be well received. But what potion do you think I 
 have used to make their ' absinthia tetra ' palatable ? I really 
 have hardly the face to write it. The possibility of its leading 
 to the university membership ! ! I really do think that, looking 
 at things simply as they are at this present moment, such a 
 thing is quite enough on the cards to make it not hypocrisy 
 to use it as I do, and much more likely than any equal dis- 
 tinction in any other line. Hope suggested it for this 
 particular purpose. And as far as I have talked yet, the 
 whole scheme seems to have been quite caught at. 
 
 To me it certainly will be an exceeding comfort to think 
 that I am reading and living here with a definite view of 
 making myself useful, ultimately at Oxford (as lecturer, not 
 as member). 
 
 To Rev. J. H. Newman. 
 
 Eliot Place : February 24, 1838. 
 
 Antiquissime, 7 I cannot help writing to say how much I 
 have been struck with your joint Preface to Froude's book. 
 
 ' Two or three letters of this date licity. The Anglican said to the 
 
 begin with this sobriquet, and one with Roman "There is hut one faith, the J 
 
 5 ifux^J onroo-ToAiK.';. See Newman's Ancient, and you have not kepTto it ;" 
 
 Apologia, p. 106) : ' The Anglican the Roman retorted " There is but one 
 
 disputant took his stand upon Antiquity Church, the Catholic, and you are out 
 
 or Apostolicity, the Roman upon Catho- f it
 
 RESIDENCE AT OXFORD 47 
 
 It really seems to me the noblest thing I have seen for a very 
 long time, and exactly to hit the right points. There is a 
 bold frank tone about it that to me seems very taking. I 
 suppose pointing out that the 'oppressor' view applied to 
 the Articles (according to Maurice's theory) you considered a 
 degree of audacity too great even ' perditissimis hominibus.' 
 
 I was a good deal amused at your American project for 
 me, which Wood told me of. Apostolical bagman would 
 certainly be an amusing trade. I mean this, really ; but that 
 must be put off till I can do it on my own account, which I 
 am afraid will approach the Greek Kalends. Paris is more 
 feasible, as I think I could manage that, without finding a 
 balance on the wrong side, in October. If I went there, I 
 think I should go after the Oriel election, and should stay a 
 month or two. 
 
 Hallam (whom I have been beginning to read) says that 
 when conciliation was the object it was held out by our 
 Church that the Liturgy was essentially the same as the Mass 
 Book, referring to Strype and Holinshed (Const. Hist. i. 117, 
 note). I do not know whether you know him, but I have 
 been rather struck to see how much he agrees with Froude in 
 the facts he states, or grants. He calls Collier the fairest 
 historian of the Reformation. He performs the part of 
 ' advocatus diaboli ' very respectably, especially in the matter 
 of Cranmer and Edward VI. 
 
 Acland took me the other evening to hear a debate on 
 the ballot, and really I wonder the Radicals do not carry 
 things before them more than they do. They seem to me so 
 obviously the straightforward side. I never saw anything 
 more absurd than Peel's shuffling retreat on finding that he 
 had hastily avowed his real reason for opposing it ; unwilling- 
 ness, viz., to trust the unbiassed votes of the constituency. 
 
 So, in spite of Sir Robert, Sodor and Man survives : 8 who 
 is to have it ? I hear that Denison came up from Salisbury 
 on purpose to vote for it, on some late occasion. 
 
 8 In a letter to Keble (October 26, me the clergy there have signed a 
 
 1837) Newman writes: 'Sir Robert petitioner, instead of against, the 
 
 Inglis [M.P. for Oxford University] suppression of their see. . . . The laity 
 
 has been to the I^Je of Man, and tells are getting up a petition against,'
 
 48 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. n 
 
 To Rev, J. H. Newman. 
 
 Eliot Place : March 20, 1838. 
 
 I was most exceedingly pleased the day before yesterday 
 to receive a copy of dear Froude's book ' from the editors,' and 
 you are hereby desired to conceive yourself thanked ' pro rei 
 suavitate ; ' and not ' pro facultate nostra.' It seems like having 
 you all three bound up together and put in one's bookshelves 
 bodily, and I hope will give o<riov ri ical evspyss to the read- 
 ing of it, as well as to the sight of the blue backs. 
 
 I have only to complain that editors and authors do not 
 have a set of title-pages sent down to them to indite with their 
 own hand the words of gift, instead of leaving it to Mr. 
 Rivington. You see you can never satisfy people. 
 
 I heard from Wilson that Judge Coleridge had protested, 
 and went to see whether I could hear anything about it from 
 J. Froude. He said his father had written to him to say that 
 Coleridge had sent him a very kind letter, but ' strongly 
 animadverting ' on the publication of some passages what, he 
 did not say. I was glad to find from what he said that the 
 Archdeacon and his family had made up their minds well to 
 that, and a great deal more of such remonstrances. 
 
 I met Utterton in an omnibus the other day, who told me 
 it was the prevailing subject of conversation at Oxford, and 
 that reasonable (!) people generally acquiesced in your reasons 
 for publication. 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 May 12, 1838. 
 
 I have committed the extravagance of hiring a pianoforte 
 for a month, to the infinite annoyance, I have no doubt, of 
 Daman who is over my head ; but such is my infirmity of 
 purpose that I know if I had it not I should be always draw- 
 ing by candlelight or some such trick. 
 
 Newman wants me to write a review of a couple of small 
 volumes of poems by two Cambridge men called Trench 9 and 
 Milnes ' for the ' British Critic,' but as it is to be done in the 
 
 8 Archbishop Trench. ' Monckton Milnes (the late Lgrd Houghton).
 
 1838 RESIDENCE AT OXFORD 49 
 
 course of the next fortnight or three weeks I do not feel very 
 hopeful. I shall give up all notion of translating Ambrose. 
 Wood, when I was in town, offered to take it off my hands, 
 and I shall accept his offer. I am pretty regular in my two 
 hours' law ; I generally get an hour of Hume, irregularly one 
 with Edward 2 (who is, besides reading, doing some Latin com- 
 position with me), and I scarce know how I get rid of the 
 rest of the day. To-morrow I am going to make a holiday, 
 a thing I have by no means earned, and make an expedition 
 about 8 miles on the London road with Courtney and an- 
 other friend, to a curious and pretty church at Dorchester, 
 which we all want to lionise. 
 
 Your affectionate brother, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS. 
 
 To Rev. J. H. Newman. 
 
 Temple : July 30, 1838. 
 
 My dear Newman, Wood and I feel honoured by being 
 selected as pursebearers for the movement. Wood only sug- 
 gests that the managers ought to be resident at Oxford, 
 which is at least uncertain in both our cases. Young Mozley 
 seems likely hereafter to be in the right position for adminis- 
 tering it. Certainly we ought, as you say, to be clerics. Of 
 course, if from any circumstances I should think myself an 
 unfit person to manage the money, I should not be breaking 
 trust in transferring it to such persons as our friends might 
 think best fitted to take my place. I understand myself 
 bound either to administer the fund for the ends which you 
 have in view, or to take care that it is put into the hands of 
 those who will so act. 
 
 I was somewhat amused at a view of you people I heard 
 the other day a propos of Mr. Davenport. A coxcombical 
 diner-out, whose name I don't know, was talking of the 
 extreme difficulty of pronouncing where religious enthusiasm 
 ended and madness began, and observed that Mr. D. brought 
 different bishops to vouch for his sanity, and ' again Pusey 
 
 2 His brother, then at Christ Church.
 
 \\ 
 
 50 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH, n 
 
 and those Oxford men, who, by the way, are themselves just 
 on those confines where it is so puzzling to pronounce.' 
 Really you had better look sharp or you will all find your- 
 selves under Dr. Warburton's care some of these days. In 
 mere prudence Pusey ought to set up a britzcha. 
 
 To Rev. J. H. Newman. 
 
 Eliot Place : August i, 1838. 
 
 My dear Newman, I went yesterday with my sister to 
 see Westmacott's drawing, and it seems to me as if it would 
 be quite beautiful, and not in the least ostentatious. It and 
 Littlemore Chapel will be quite worthy of one another. My 
 sister, to whom I had read your account of it, went not quite 
 prepared to find fault, but certainly with considerable mis- 
 givings, and was quite converted by the sight of it to 
 unqualified admiration. However, all I had to say I said to 
 Westmacott. He was uncommonly good-natured in showing 
 all the beautiful things in his studio, and talked very warmly 
 about you, and hesitatingly about his possible ' British Critic ' 
 article. So the acquaintance began very flourishingly, and I 
 am to call on him when we are in town together again. Really 
 he may be a most valuable aid if he will take in good earnest 
 to reviving the old rjdos in sculpture, which seems quite his 
 notion. 
 
 What do you think of Gladstone's exculpation of you ? 
 And what of the face Froude would have made at being 
 quoted in the House of Commons as ' an accomplished 
 gentleman' by Lord Morpeth? 3 And what of Sir R. H. 
 Inglis's pledging himself that the University was not 'becom- 
 ing day by day a less loyal child of the Reformation ' ? Over- 
 hasty Sir Robert ! 
 
 Gladstone, by the bye, is engaged on a book on ' Church 
 and State,' or rather, Wood says, ' the Duties of the State to 
 the Church.' I do not know whether to be glad or not ; he 
 
 3 See a letter from Newman to editor of the Remains [of Hurrell 
 
 James Mozley (Letters and Correspon- Fronde]. Gladstone has defended me ; 
 
 dence,\i. 255): ' You see Lord Morpeth Sir R. Inglis the University.' 
 has been upon me in the House, as 
 
 '
 
 1838 RESIDENCE AT OXFORD 51 
 
 certainly must pledge himself to principles far above those 
 held by any modern statesman, and from the way in which 
 he talks of Erastianism and Church grievances, and Hook, 
 I hope he won't tether himself the wrong way. 
 
 To Rev. J. H. Newman. 
 
 Eliot Place : October 4, 1838. 
 
 My dear Newman, I cannot say I got anything beyond 
 amusement from my trip : the size of our family party made 
 it even more than usually difficult to pick up information, and 
 I am never much of a hand at it. The priests seem to have 
 identified themselves with the Revolution very much so 
 everyone says. In the cathedral is a monument to a certain 
 Count Merode who was killed, they write, ' Catholicae fidei 
 patriaeque jura tuendo,' but the civil authorities, and the one 
 or two laics to whom I could talk, seemed to put it on the 
 mere ' liberty ' ground. I suppose that is partly from 
 Leopold's being a Protestant. Do you see that Lacordaire 
 (of 'Avenir ' memory) is putting himself at the head of a re- 
 establishment of the Dominicans in France ? Also do you 
 observe in Blackwood an attack on a book of Guizot's for 
 being Roman Catholic ? He seems from the little I saw to be 
 doing wonderfully good service to the Middle Ages. 
 
 I was sorry to hear that your friend, Mr. Stephen of the 
 Colonial Office, was the author of the article on Froude ; 
 though it is better than if it had been a younger man. Doyle 
 talked of it and spoke of the ' Remains ' as having produced 
 the impression of an unamiable character. 
 
 To Rev. J. H. Newman. 
 
 Eliot Place : January 21, 1839. 
 
 My dear Newman, I am very glad to hear what you say 
 generally about the going on of things ; certainly one cannot 
 go anywhere without hearing of the ' Oxford Tract party,' 
 &c. I could scarcely write a letter in the club-room the other 
 day, so much was my attention distracted by two men who
 
 52 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. n 
 
 were discussing you and you seem by degrees to be taking 
 possession even of the public streets ; at least the last time I 
 crossed St. Paul's Churchyard I heard the words ' Newmanite ' 
 and ' Puseyite ' (a new and sonorous compound) from' two 
 passers-by, wffo were talking very intently. I hear people 
 talk of the desirableness of some systematic, or at least com- 
 pendious, statement of what you really do teach. What 
 regard is due to the complainants I scarce do know. They 
 were elderly people, and more or less Establishmentarians, 
 and certainly within my own experience hereabouts I should 
 say what one has seen elsewhere that the rising genera- 
 tion areour hope : elderly people believe newspapers and 
 periodicals ; which is a great disadvantage. Wood seems 
 sanguine, as does the redoubtable Nathaniel Goldsmid, and 
 one or two other youngers contrariwise certainly the elders. 
 
 I am sorry to hear the bishops join the Cranmer business, 4 
 and, I must say, sorry also that they make it a church not a 
 monument, as the farther they went in identifying it with 
 Cranmer, the more intelligible was the ground that one could 
 take against them. 
 
 If you want to see a fresh crime of Cranmer's, look at the 
 comment with which he accompanies his signature to certain 
 answers to certain questions on doctrinal points, submitted by 
 Henry VIII. to the bishops and learned men of the Church. 
 Also look at the Bishop of London's (I believe Bonner's) 
 answer to the first question, on the definition of a sacrament 
 (Burnet, vol. i. part 2, pp. 314 and 367). I am exceedingly 
 glad "you speak so highly of Gladstone. What do you think 
 of the following glee (which I have just fallen foul of) as a 
 compendium of the 1688 rjOos ? 
 
 Let's live good honest lives, 
 
 And make much of our wives, 
 
 And since all flesh is grass 
 
 Let's merrily drink our glass. 
 God bless our noble King, what need we fear the Pope. 
 
 the Jesuits, Jews and Turks ? 
 For we defy the Devil and all his works. 
 
 4 The Martyrs' Memorial at Oxford. printed in Letters and Correspondence, 
 (This letter is in answer to one from ii. 279). 
 Newman of January 14, which is
 
 1839 RESIDENCE AT OXFORD 53 
 
 To Rev. J. H. Nezvman. 
 
 Eliot Place: September 13, 1839. 
 
 My dear Newman, Edward tells me that you purposed 
 writing to me soon, so I take the initiative in order to bring 
 your good intentions to a point. I have not much satisfactory 
 to say concerning myself, having spent my time in a very 
 pleasant idleness at H. Wilberforce's and up the Seine with 
 my sister. 
 
 At Rouen, which was our farthest point, I was a good deal 
 pleased "affcT amused with a French priest, almoner of a 
 hospital, to whom H. W. introduced me. H. W. had told me 
 that he was a simple, unlearned, amiable kind of man who 
 confined himself to his duties, but from his intercourse with 
 him (H. W.) and Shadwell (a friend of ours) he has obviously 
 conceived a hope that he may be in his little way instrumental 
 in the great work which he considers going on in England. 
 And accordingly I found him with the end of his tongue 
 thoroughly furnished with all the quips and quirks, and sly 
 questions, which could be launched against an Anglican, and 
 obviously unable to resist any opportunity of bringing them 
 out. He evidently liked H. W. very much ; confessed, as 
 he said, a ' faible pour M. Wilberforce,' but could not resist 
 cuts at him as a family man ; wanted to know whether we had 
 not a kind of hereditary priesthood in England ; observed in 
 showing us his vestments that Madame W. must have 
 regretted much the disuse of them, ' she would have been 
 very well pleased to see her husband in these fine dresses ; ' 
 was constantly observing, ' We, who are not reformed, who are 
 behind the rest of the world, have preserved this custom,' 
 or ' take a good deal of care about these little things/ 
 as he was showing off vestments, chapels, and everything 
 else that he thought by any possibility could captivate us. 
 He kept Wilberforce's and Shadwell's cards with great care, 
 because they would be valuable when the said W. and S.
 
 54 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. 11 
 
 turned Catholic ; was anxious I should do so, urging the 
 authority of Marshal Turenne, who was converted by Bossuet's 
 Exposition, which he accordingly gave me ; asked whether 
 there were no Catholic priests in England whom I could 
 consult ; cross-examined me to elicit the uncertainty of the 
 Church of England teaching; argued in (I must say) rather a 
 light, controversial, skin-deep way about the Eucharist, and 
 floored me most uncommonly by asking me whether I could 
 in my conscience say that I had no doubts in my heart about 
 my own Church being right ; my sister said she had none, but 
 he did not seem inclined to accept that as an answer, and the 
 ' consequence was that a certain uncomfortable silence, which 
 I kept, must have considerably strengthened an impression 
 (much to be deplored, but which certainly existed in his mind) 
 that the English Church had not the strongest conceivable 
 hold on the mind of her children. I should like much to 
 send him Hope ; he is particularly anxious that all of us 
 should send him ' beaucoup de vos amis.' He tells me I am 
 not far from the kingdom of Heaven, as, I hear, he told 
 Shadwell ; but obviously his sympathies are entirely, at 
 present, with individuals, not with our Church. And I take 
 discredit to myself for not having properly stuck up for my 
 Mother. One thing is, it is so difficult to get beyond common- 
 places, unless you understand a language much better than I 
 do French. 
 
 I (who like my friends' wives, though ' presbyterae ') passed 
 a very pleasant time with H. W., who seems to me flourish- 
 ing. He really keeps his edge very sharp, in spite of the 
 country tendencies that you complain of. 
 
 Did you talk over with Wilson, when at Hursley, his 
 notion of being a candidate for the Mastership of Acland's 
 London Normal School, and the opposition to him as curate 
 of Kebles, raised by him of London, and Wood's gentlemanly 
 and quiet request (at the Board) that, for the convenience of 
 all proscribed parties, a definite line of exclusion might be 
 drawn, to which the authorities declined acceding ? 
 
 Has your long vacation produced anything besides 
 Dionysius ? However, you will tell me all about that ; I
 
 II 
 
 1839 RESIDENCE AT OXFORD 55 
 
 shall expect to hear great things, for I think one's notions of 
 other people's capabilities are much increased by one's own 
 idleness. 5 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS. 
 
 To Rev. J. H. Newman. 
 
 Eliot Place : September 16, 1839. 
 
 My dearest N., I did not calculate on eliciting such a 
 pathetic apology as the exordium of your letter by my P.S. 
 Another time I will write at the bottom ' this is a joke,' as I 
 see you do, though I must say such exceeding caution seems 
 to me more considerate than complimentary. 
 
 As you make an attack on me, let me tell you that your 
 well-wishers here are all in the act of being extremely 
 scandalised at reports which reach them (not through me) of 
 your making yourself conspicuous by short trousers, worsted 
 stockings, and bad gloves a kind of notoriety more befitting 
 a Methodist preacher than an ' Anglo-Catholic ' priest, and 
 which those who have the onus upon them of defending or 
 explaining all that you think yourself justified in doing have 
 much right to complain of. If you can't mend in any other 
 way, you must be compelled to wear Wellingtons and straps. 
 
 I wish you would come here for a day or two, though I 
 do not know that I have much to attract you : my playing 
 sister is away, so you would not have any Beethoven, and I 
 suspect everybody is out of town. Church has promised me 
 a day or two before the vacation is over, and I would try 
 and bring him up at the same time. Do try to pare an end 
 off somebody's visit, and let me have it. I only limit myself 
 to a day or two because I suppose it is hopeless to ask for 
 more ; I hope you do not want to be told that nothing would 
 give us greater pleasure than to have you with us for the rest 
 of the vacation. 
 
 5 Newman's answer, dated Septem- come to the worst, I should turn 
 
 her 15, is printed in his Letters and Brother of Charity in London an 
 
 Correspondence, ii. 285. In the course object which, qtiite independently of any 
 
 of it he says : ' You see, if things were to such perplexities, is growing on me.'
 
 56 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. n 
 
 I don't wonder at what you say about ' brother of Charity.' 
 It is a kind of thought that causes 'even me sometimes a 
 certain unsubstantial fidgety aspiration, such as people have 
 after those acts of self-denial from which circumstances seem 
 most effectually to protect them. But what do you mean by 
 ' things coming to the worst ' ? Ejectment from Oriel and St. 
 Mary's, or the Triple Crown ? Oibo ! That you should be con- 
 templating such contingencies ! A s to our ill-treatment of them, 
 I do think they should remember that if we hanged, they burnt, 
 and if we have married Bishops, they have had profligate Popes. 
 
 1 must finish, as I am going to town to wish Henry 
 Denison of All Souls' good-bye. He is going off with a 
 younger brother to settle in New South Wales. Of all the 
 birds in the air ! 6 
 
 To Miss M. Rogers. 
 
 Oriel : October 30, 1839. 
 
 My dear Marian, My occupations since I left home have 
 been principally confined to accounts (which do not suggest 
 any interesting topics) and certain necessary letters (which 
 are much in the same predicament). The only thing which 
 has happened to me lately which has not happened to me 
 twenty times before, is that I have taken a lesson or two of 
 Johnson in the art . of observing (stars, that is), which I can 
 fancy very interesting. It certainly is remarkable to see a 
 star waddle across the field of a telescope, set to the right 
 place half an hour before, exactly where and when you ex- 
 pected it ; and there is something exceedingly satisfactory in 
 the wonderful accuracy with which you note down its pro- 
 ceedings. Johnson's two first observations told the same story 
 within -J-Q-JJ- of a second. And my own first observation (on 
 which I pride myself) I think verified itself to about T V of a 
 second. Then there is a kind of tranquil punctuality about 
 the observer's way of going on which is highly edifying. You 
 get to appreciate such infinitely small fractions of time as a 
 
 6 It was in answer to this letter that man, containing the quotation from 
 
 Newman wrote the letter, dated Sep- St. Augustine, ' Secwrus judicat orbis 
 
 tember 22 (fitters and Correspondence, terrarum,' which, hesays in the Apologia, 
 
 ii. 286) about the article by Dr. Wise- so strongly affected him. 

 
 1839 RESIDENCE AT OXFORD 57 
 
 matter of course, you consider yourself as having ' plenty of 
 time ' to get yourself in order for an event which is to happen 
 in 1 5 seconds, and this when being too late even by one second 
 is irretrievable. Two things are absolutely necessary, never 
 to be too late, and never to be in a hurry, and it is a decided 
 object not to be many seconds too soon. I can't fancy any 
 more magnificent practice for a fidgety person who wanted 
 to be un fidgeted. 
 
 Oxford is very full of our friends, Johnson, Mozley, Hope, 
 and Church being the principal, besides Newman. 
 
 I hear Wilson will probably be settled in London, being 
 likely to be nominated master of one of the National Society 
 (Acland's) Training Schools for masters. It is a great act of 
 self-devotion on his part going from Hursley to be a school- 
 master in London, and so I think he feels it, but I should 
 think he would be uncommonly useful. I shall like to see 
 him now and then. The Bishop of London objected to him 
 as Keble's curate, and was^tjrrrywron over by the very high 
 character Sir H. Oakeley gave of Wilson. It seems amusing 
 that Sir H. Oakeley's good opinion should compensate for 
 the guilt of a connexion with Keble. 
 
 I have been not a little amused since writing all the 
 above at a regular pitched battle between a Roman Catholic 
 priest, who has been picked up here by a good-natured friend 
 of mine named Hamilton 7 (chaplain to Bishop Denison), 
 and Palmer, 8 of whom you have heard from the Winters. 
 Hamilton asked me to meet the Roman Catholic, and Palmer 
 was of the party ! After dinner the Roman Catholic set to, 
 and Palmer in like manner. Strange to say, I seldom remem- 
 ber having laughed more, the two men were so unlike, and 
 their modes of attack so very amusing. The Roman Catholic 
 was as unfair as he could be, but he certainly gave Palmer 
 one or two sharp shakings. He was a clever man, up with 
 the particular points in question, and prepared to lie when he 
 
 7 Walter Hamilton, who was in the as Bishop of Salisbury, 
 
 remove above Frederic Rogers at Eton. 8 William Palmer, brother of the 
 
 At this time he was a Fellow of Merton late Lord ' Selbome. He afterwards 
 
 and examining chaplain tc Bishop joined the Church of Rome. 
 Denison, whom he succeeded in 1854
 
 58 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. n 
 
 thought he would not be found out (as he was once), and 
 every now and then coming a bit of eloquence, very much 
 reminding me of Malan in his way of putting awkward ques- 
 tions, and sneering by implication at our deficiencies ; Palmer, 
 on the contrary, prosing away in a dry humorous way, with 
 answers for almost everything sometimes grievously far-fetched, 
 and when he had no answer simply resuming the thread of 
 his discourse as if nothing had happened and flowing on 
 again with equanimity. I am somewhat amused at Hamilton's 
 having been the man to pick up the Papist, and that by a kind 
 of accident. 
 
 You have probably not heard what you will be very sorry 
 to hear, that Henry 9 goes after all to the West Indies. He 
 starts on the 1 5th of November. I have just heard it from 
 home. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS. 
 
 To Miss S. Rogers. 
 
 Oriel : November 12, 1839. 
 
 My dear Sophy, I duly sent off the music to Mrs. Keble, 
 but forgot that your note was not in the parcel with the music, 
 but elsewhere ; your note therefore I sent by itself afterwards, 
 crossing a note from Keble to acknowledge what had come, 
 and to state that your note (which I had alluded to in a letter 
 to him) had not. I will copy his sentence not because there 
 is anything in it, but because I know people (and I suppose 
 you) like particular acknowledgments. ' Let me now thank 
 you and your sister most kindly in Charlotte's name and my 
 own for the letter, music, and buckle, all of which were most 
 acceptable in their kind ; but there was no letter from Miss 
 Rogers in the parcel which I think you gave us reason to 
 expect ; there was a slip of paper with a pattern for painted 
 glass which we conjectured might have slipped in by mistake 
 for the note. Shall I return it, and will your sister send her 
 letter in exchange ? ' 
 
 9 His brother, then in the Artillery.
 
 1839 RESIDENCE AT OXFORD 59. 
 
 I have set going here a little singing meeting with one of 
 the young Aclands 1 and Anderdon (who is just up for his 
 degree now) under the auspices of a certain Mr. Elvey 2 which 
 I hope will get on into something. Two hours in the evening 
 once a week to practise a little old sacred music. There has 
 been some bad luck about our start, engagements interfering, 
 &c., which (as Elvey is rather an odd-tempered gentleman ^ 
 whom I particularly want to talk over) I somewhat regret. 
 But we shall see what we shall see. 
 
 Oxford is full of friends. Acland 3 is up, though not at 
 this moment, else I should get him to frank this. Two of our 
 friends (Pattison and Christie by name) have just got Fellow- 
 ships at different colleges, and altogether things are very 
 pleasant ; only perhaps rather too many engagements. We 
 have all sorts of queer people coming here now, having 
 got rid of the Papist ; we have had a Syrian Christian from 
 Beyrout, interpreter to the Persian princes, dining about here.. 
 He dined with Newman one day in his fez &c., very much 
 indeed to the amusement of the undergraduates. Unluckily,, 
 just as he was coming we heard reports of his being a great 
 scamp, which materially lessened our satisfaction at his pre- 
 sence, particularly by making us anxious about our silver 
 spoons. If it had not been for this report, which I really 
 believe was only the malice of some missionary, he would 
 have been a great lion. He talked English as grammatically 
 and far more fluently than I can, and was only too happy to 
 hold forth about the Syrian Church, which certainly from his 
 account is terribly bullied. Whenever any Christian power 
 displeases the Grand Turk he bastinadoes all the bishops,, 
 priests, and deacons in his dominions. 
 
 I must finish, as I have to go to one of Newman's soirees 
 and am late. Love to all. 
 
 Your affectionate brother, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS. 
 
 1 The present Sir Henry Acland and George Elvey. 
 
 a younger brother. 3 The present Sir Thomas Acland,, 
 
 - The well-known composer, Sir at that time M. P. for West Somerset.
 
 60 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. n 
 
 To Rev. J. H. Newman. 
 
 < January 21, 1840. 
 
 My dear Newman, It seems almost absurd to write to 
 you now, as I shall see you on Saturday, but I do not like to 
 come back without having thanked you for your letter, which 
 was a most exceeding relief to me. 
 
 I have just seen Wood for the first time, after many in- 
 effectual attempts : he is contemplating a little account of 
 Endowments (Monasteries, Colleges, Tithes, Hospitals) for the 
 Christian Knowledge Society, to be one of a set of books 
 which Hope is busying himself about, in favour of which he 
 has given up Churton's ' Englishman's Library.' 
 
 I see a popular way of speaking is beginning to be that 
 * without agreeing with the Oxford people, it must be allowed 
 they have done good hitherto.' A young clergyman was 
 saying that, in the country, people who talked in that way 
 were altering their practice in a way that ' we town people ' 
 had no notion of, and he spoke of a fox-hunting style of clergy- 
 man, who, ' without any agreement with the Oxford Tracts,' 
 had been setting up services on Saints' days and other days. 
 He himself, he said, was on the point of taking a curacy 
 under a friend of his, but found to his amazement that he 
 would involve himself in three daily services, one at 6 o'clock 
 in the morning, and, not liking either to go on with this or to 
 leave it off, receded. 
 
 I met Blakesley the other day. I see the intellectual thing at 
 Cambridge is to despise exceedingly the ' vulgar outcry ' about 
 Froude, and to admire him as a phenomenon with more or 
 fewer reservations (professing to be more refined than those 
 of the populace) according to the individual. As if they and 
 Froude were clever enough to understand one another, and to 
 have a kind of communion on the basis of intellect, however 
 they might differ. James Spedding, Froude's cousin, seems 
 an exception to this liberal way of viewing things, which 
 Blakesley exceedingly wonders at, because ' Spedding is a 
 man of so remarkably catJwlic a mind, a man who can under- 
 stand and be intimate with men from whom he differs in
 
 1840 RESIDENCE AT OXFORD 61 
 
 every single article of opinion.' I suggested that Froude 
 could make himself disagreeable on occasions, but could 
 not make Blakesley view it as a reality, that though most 
 fascinating in general, he might have chosen to be other- 
 wise to Spedding. I myself should scarcely have expected 
 it, for Spedding is, I should think, anything but a random 
 talker, indeed (whether for good or for bad) a remarkably 
 calm-sighted, thoughtful, observant kind of man I mean I 
 should have expected F. to have been rather distant than 
 severe or hostile to him. 
 
 The House of Commons seems with Sir R. Peel at their 
 head to have got into a most uncommon scrape with the 
 Judges ; among lawyers I fancy there can scarce be said to be 
 two opinions, and Follett, who was the great authority on the 
 Commons' side, has changed his opinion on looking at the 
 cases. 4 I see very few people, but can scarce make out how 
 so little excitement is felt about this, or about the Chartists. 
 The prospect of being without tea seems to me what princi- 
 pally affects people of all the various political subjects going. 
 
 To Rev. J. H. Newman. 
 
 Eliot Place : June 14, 1840. 
 
 My dear Newman, I don't know that I have much 
 reason for writing except to inform you of the fact that I am 
 come back to England, and hope to set to work in earnest on 
 Bentham No. 2. I suppose you do not expect it for this next 
 number. 5 
 
 I consider myself to have had a very successful fortnight 
 abroad, almost entirely occupied however in looking at scenery, 
 Cologne and Mayence Cathedrals being the only ecclesiastical 
 things which we saw. 
 
 I came across one Roman Catholic priest with whom I 
 
 4 A Mr. Stockdale had prosecuted a matter of Privilege, and passed a 
 
 Messrs. Hansard for publishing a libel motion committing the sheriffs who had 
 
 in the Parliamentary Debates and had levied damages upon Hansard. [See 
 
 obtained damages in the Court of Greville Memoirs, 2nd part, i. 257.] 
 Queen's Bench. Sir R. Peel joined 5 Of the British Critic, which New- 
 
 with Lord John Russell in treating it as man edited from 1838 to 1841.
 
 62 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. n 
 
 had some conversation on a railroad. We got as far as a 
 little skirmishing just in the old style ; he repeated Malais's 
 jeers against Henry VIII.'s spoliations, and I the natural 
 retort of the desecrated churches in France. He had told 
 me that he was travelling for amusement, and I had told him 
 to come to England ; he said he travelled in Catholic countries, 
 I said we called ourselves Catholic ; he asked how it was then 
 that we had not decorations in our churches, which led to Henry 
 VIII., &c. I told him I would show him some churches bien 
 soigne'es in Oxford if he would come there, on which he 
 asked if there were not some professors there who ' se rappro- 
 chent a la religion Catholique ; ' I replied rather quickly ' Us 
 la tiennent, Monsieur,' on which he closed the conversation 
 with an impatient ' Augh,' as if it really were too bad that a 
 person of education should persevere in talking such non- 
 sense. 
 
 The Archbishop of Cologne's business people consider as 
 likely to be settled, the Archbishop not returning to his diocese, 
 and Rome winking at the mixed marriages. A Frenchman 
 (who seemed to me a raff) told me that the plan in France 
 was for the marrying parties (or party) to give the promise 
 required by the Church (that children of both sexes should be 
 brought up as Catholics) verbally, with which the clergy were 
 satisfied ; then, when children made their appearance, the 
 promise was broken without redress, as the law (if appealed to) 
 will enforce its own general rule, unless a written promise can 
 be produced to the contrary : that rule being that males 
 follow the father, and females the mother. The clergy, he 
 said, did not much like this, but ' faisaient bonne mine a un 
 mauvais jeu/ or some such phrase.
 
 1840 63 
 
 CHAPTER III 
 Winter at Rome. Relinquishment of Oxford Life. 
 
 IN the autumn of 1840 he went to Italy with James Hope 
 (afterward Hope-Scott). They remained there principally at 
 Rome through the winter, and returned to England in May 
 1841. Both the friends had desired, among other objects of 
 travel, to make themselves in some degree acquainted with the 
 organisation and management of the Roman Church. What- 
 ever the result to Mr. Hope (who joined the Roman Church 
 some years later), the effect on Frederic Rogers was to 
 strengthen his anti-Roman convictions. On His return to 
 Oxford he found the storm raging which had been raised by 
 Tract 90. He was now divided by pronounced differences of 
 opinion, not only from the more advanced men, such as Ward 
 and Oakeley, but also from Newman himself, and did not in all 
 points agree with the attitude adopted by the leaders of the 
 more moderate and steadfast party in the movement, such as 
 Keble, Pusey, and Sir G. Prevost. Those of whose opinions 
 and actions in Oxford he now most approved were Church, 
 who from this time to the end of his life was his closesT~ahd 
 most intimate friend, and James" Mozley. The festilt of this 
 breaking of old ties was that, after two terms spent at Oxford, 
 he settled to give up the University life, and to read law in 
 London, taking advantage at the same time of a proposal 
 that he should write leading articles for the ' Times.' 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 Oriel : July 2, 1840. 
 
 My dear Kate, I have had young Walter with me 
 again pressing me to write for his father" even if I cannot
 
 64 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. in 
 
 edit, and suggesting the Opium Question for a few articles. 
 TTns unattached way of doing things seems to me very 
 feasible. ... I almost think I shall try my hand. No one 
 will know anything about the matter except my own private 
 friends, and I can do just as much and as little as I please. 
 Hope l wants me very much to go with him to Italy this 
 wkfter. He goes for his health, and Newman will have it I 
 ought to go for mine. It is tempting, as I cannot hope to 
 have such a pleasant companion often (perhaps ever) again. 
 And he would have capital introductions and all my own 
 tastes. I doubt about leaving the Treasurership [at Oriel], 
 about having quite money enough, and whether after all my 
 health would be sufficiently benefited to give me an honest 
 excuse for going. Perhaps by these articles I might turn a 
 penny or two which would help me. I should like to hear 
 what all you think of it 
 
 Yours very affectionately, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS. 
 
 To Edzuard Rogers, Esq. 
 
 Lyons, Hotel du Nord : November 3, 1840. 
 
 My dear Edward, I told you I should give you a line from 
 Lyons, where I am shut in by rain. I have been somewhat 
 unlucky in my journey here, as I was rather in my crossing 
 from Southampton. Paris was prosperous enough, as I have 
 duly written home. I found the Chalons diligence started 1 2 
 hours later than I wished, and so had to take the Nevers and 
 Moulins road to Lyons, travelling 36 hours to Moulins, there 
 sleeping, passing Sunday, and on Sunday evening at 9 o'clock 
 starting again, intending to get to Lyons in about 20 odd 
 hours. I hear, however, somewhat startling accounts of the 
 floods consequent upon the last few days of heavy rain in all 
 the hilly country between Moulins and Lyons (part of which 
 is very pretty, or more). As we got on, these reports began 
 to increase in vigour ; people ' did not recollect the water so 
 high since 1812;' 'at a place called Pont Charlan the water 
 was 4 or 5 feet deep over the road,' &c. &c. ; however, we 
 
 1 James Hope, afterwards Hope Scott of Abbotsford.
 
 1840 WINTER AT ROME 65 
 
 passed the ' 4 foot ' boldly and found it not much over the 
 axles, and we hoped that all would be equally manageable 
 (we were to arrive at Lyons after 24 hours' travelling at 
 1 1 o'clock and there sleep) ; however, the reports which met us 
 became more and more threatening, the faubourg between us 
 and Lyons was ' impassable, under water, houses going, 34 
 bodies picked up of people drowned by the inundation.' At 
 the relais before we got to Lyons we heard pretty much the 
 state of the case. First, the Rhone had risen tremendously 
 and carried away all sorts of things that are too near it or too 
 low, manufactories and houses, stopping up all straight com- 
 munication with Lyons on the Italian side (as some English 
 travellers told us at the relais who had been stopped for some 
 time), then the Rhone subsided and people began to think 
 themselves quit, but in the night the Saone rose twice as high 
 and did most tremendous havoc ; the houses are of mud, so 
 that the river had nothing to do but eat away for a short time 
 at the foundations and down the whole came, and, as it was 
 unexpected, I fear very many lives were lost. The woman 
 of the house was in a great state of fright about a son of hers 
 who had a manufactory near the banks of the Saone. How- 
 ever, we went on as close to Lyons as we could, and about 12 
 o'clock arrived within a mile or two with nothing between us 
 and it but this suburb (Vaize), which was under water and 
 quite impassable, and no way but a roundabout one, which I 
 walked when it became light. It would have been madness 
 for a diligence to attempt it at night. So we stopped (accord- 
 ing to orders which had met the conducteur] at a little 
 auberge for the night. Beds, of course, there were none, and 
 every one was rushing from their houses down below in terror 
 and filling up everything ; one woman came in who had been 
 confined not 24 hours ; what they did with her I don't know ; 
 I proposed making a kind of couch on a billiard table which 
 was in the room, and as that was not done I suppose some- 
 thing better was. A man gave us an account, which I only 
 half understood, of his having been let down through a win- 
 dow and got off, but having heard others who could not be 
 carried off crying out ' Oh! qa coule, fa coule' (meaning the 
 house was falling). One man had seen 26 houses go at once
 
 66 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. in 
 
 another 18. This went on, people coming in and out for 
 most of the night (perhaps all) till I went to sleep (taliter 
 qualiter} in the diligence, and the next morning as I walked 
 in with two Frenchmen by the roundabout way I saw what 
 had been a house (the flooring and the stairs or rather steps 
 being all that betrayed much of its origin) washed through 
 the bridge under my feet. All the steamboats had of course 
 been discontinued ; it is all that the water can do by itself to 
 get under some of the bridges, and besides people say 
 steamers would be washed clear away into the country, and if 
 they could get down safe, getting up again would be quite out 
 of the question. And now (at least three hours ago) they 
 told me the water was still rising, and, as the rain goes on 
 hard, one does not see what chance there is of its ceasing to 
 rise. 
 
 I have had a letter from Hope,, who will be at Milan till 
 the loth. I shall start hence ovtfr Mount Cenis to Turin by 
 malle-poste to-morrow morning at 5 o'clock, and they profess 
 that forty-two hours (I suppose really about forty-eight or 
 fifty) will take us to Turin. Then I shall stop a day and 
 night to rest and look about me, spend the Sunday probably 
 at Vercelli, Novara, or some such place, and on Monday on 
 to Milan, where you had better direct to me until further 
 orders at Reichman's Hotel. 
 
 I have just been to the table d'hote and out to do divers 
 things and look about me. I never saw such an uncomfort- 
 able affair. The streets are narrow and very high ; I counted 
 nine stories once in a new house, very dirty and smoky-look- 
 ing. Then there is a drizzle, occasionally increasing into hard 
 rain, and with all this all the streets leading to the Saone are 
 crowded with people walking about in a vague kind of way, 
 with dripping umbrellas ; then at the end of each street is an 
 actual crowd watching the advance of the water up the street. 
 I stood in one crowd for some little time in a street which did 
 not lead direct to the Saone, but into another parallel to the 
 river. How many streets there were between me and the 
 Saone I don't know, but I expect more than one ; and yet 
 the water was advancing up the street where I stood in pulses 
 at about half a minute's distance (I should guess), each pulse
 
 1840 WINTER AT ROME 67 
 
 advancing perhaps a foot and a half farther than the one 
 before it. It was very hopeless wandering about, as really I 
 never knew when I should or should not be intercepted by a 
 flooded street. Once or twice I was obliged to turn back 
 when I thought I had got into the middle of the town and fairly 
 turned the flank of the water. At a church door I saw a 
 crowd of people reading a Proclamation, or at least a letter to 
 his Cures from the Archbishop, telling them to use, till 
 November 15, a form of Mass before commanded, adding the 
 prayer ' ad compescendam aquarum inundationem,* to come 
 to an understanding with the Mayor about subscriptions and 
 covering for those who were out of their houses, offering his own 
 ' salles de 1'Archeveche ' for the effects of those who wanted 
 to bestow them somewhere, and telling them to bid their 
 parishioners implore the succour of her whom the Church 
 called the ' Consolatrice des affliges/ and who had so often 
 benefited the city of Lyons. The people, I thought, seemed 
 pleased with it. Since I began my letter a bridge has gone, 
 but I could not get near it, nor indeed near the Saone, without 
 more trouble and paddling than I liked. It is really a fright- 
 ful thing to think of the tJwusands that are thrown clean out 
 into the streets, unless so far as their neighbours house them, 
 for fear their houses should fall on their heads. I have 
 written as fast as I can write and cannot read over (candle- 
 light), so I dare say there are mistakes. You may as well 
 send it to Church with my compliments. He is a gossiping 
 fellow who will be edified by it ; as for Newman, he would say 
 I was practising for reporter to a newspaper. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS. 
 
 Extract from a fragment of journal written at Milan in 
 November 1840 : 
 
 Friday, November 13. We went to Manzojii's 2 at half-past 
 ten ; found Vitali 3 who says he sees him every morning. He 
 
 2 Manzoni was living close to Milan. remains in my memory of him. ' 
 He had 'written I Promessi Spo si about 3 Ambrogio Vitali, Secretary to the 
 
 thirteen years before^~~I7ord Blachford Archbishop of Milan. His brother 
 
 writes elsewhere : ' A gentle, refined, Giuseppe was a Professor at Monza. 
 sensitive purity and earnestness is what
 
 68 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. in 
 
 made us seat ourselves, and observed, laughing, ' You see, I 
 order about here as if it were in my own house.' He went 
 in to tell Manzoni, who came out and almost immediately 
 began controversy, as we had expected. His breakfast came 
 in, coffee and bread, which he took at a table a little removed 
 from us, going on with the conversation, with one or two 
 interruptions which were despatched pretty summarily. Part 
 of his argument was : The Gospel is not only for men of 
 leisure and acquirement, but for the poor. Now, a peasant, 
 whose allegiance the English and Roman Church each claim, 
 can say to the English, ' You confess there was a time (pre- 
 vious to the Reformation), when you held what you now 
 contradict. You say you were wrong. How then can you 
 ask me to follow your teaching implicitly ? God commands 
 me to have an assurance, a full un doubting faith in what I 
 hold. I cannot have this, except as based on an infallible 
 guide.' 
 
 Tie said he felt a kind of'effroi' at reading some account 
 of the Queen of England's coronation oath, that the doctrine 
 of Transubstantiation was abominable, &c. r On what 
 ground could a young girl pretend to anathematise with such 
 certainty the whole Catholic Church? Was if on the 
 strength of her own individual judgment, or on the authority 
 of a Church which did not pretend to be unerring ? ' 
 
 Hope said that if Roman Catholics were to convince us 
 they must first study us. Manzoni said he himself was cer- 
 tainly ignorant on these points, but it must be remembered 
 that Roman Catholic controversialists would often appear 
 less learned than they were, from avoiding details purposely, 
 as knowing that the question was one of principles and there- 
 fore declining any challenge to descend from them. 
 
 He spoke of the appointment of French bishops as won- 
 derfully ordered for good, though in the hands of an infidel 
 government. 
 
 He said : ' If you have to do with an atheist, you cannot 
 make him see proof of God in all that you regard as such ; 
 he has an answer for all your positive arguments. So it is 
 with the Church. She cannot be proved by argument ; she 
 proves herself by her appearance ; and then, when objections
 
 1840 WINTER AT ROME 69 
 
 are brought against her, seeing they are intrinsically false 
 and unreasonable, they can be answered by reason. This 
 perception of the Church and all truth God gives ; but ' in 
 answer to an objection of Hope's ' discussion is still useful to 
 excite interest and remove prejudice.' 
 
 Hope observed that Manzoni might have this faith in the 
 Roman Catholic Church's infallibility from early education ; 
 but, for us, we wanted positive evidence. Manzoni interrupted 
 him seriously : ' Stop : let me speak for myself. I was for many 
 years of my life (I pray God to pardon me for it) in utter infi- 
 delity, nay, anxious to make proselytes. I hated the Church, 
 and had some liking for Protestantism, as its enemy.' He 
 then told how he began reading Protestant controversies with 
 Rome, and was convinced ' by her majestic attitude ' of her 
 truth. Hope said, to speak frankly, that fact explained to 
 him the stress which Manzoni laid on the necessity of an in- 
 fallible authority, as the expression of an unnatural craving 
 and the consequence of a disordered state of mind ; and that 
 he had another Roman Catholic friend whose history was the 
 same, and who argued in the same way. Manzoni replied : 
 ' There is then a living man in this case, whose name I know 
 not, besides myself. Let me add another St. Augustine.' 
 As we took our leave he said : ' I trust it is God that is work- 
 ing in you. You are not like Protestants who deny that they 
 have a Mother. You are only bewildered and do not know 
 who your Mother is.' 
 
 On Sunday we went to Manzoni again. I only remember 
 disjointed things which he said, partly because people came 
 in among others Grossi, the author of ' Visconti.' Manzoni 
 talked of priests as often not well instructed because they 
 cease reading when they are employed in their parishes ; but 
 a priest is regarded as a gentleman whatever his father may 
 be ; hence the poorer classes are anxious to have a son a 
 priest, to raise the family ; but for the very poor the educa- 
 tion is too expensive. The Church, he thought, wanted a 
 fresh Order ; the old Orders had lost their force ; even in the 
 Jesuits he did not see any elements of great power. 
 
 He spoke of reform in the Italian language, a hobby of 
 his, and observed that we ' had paramount authority in
 
 70 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. in 
 
 London ' ! which ruled pronunciation, whereas in Italy no 
 state would concede the supremacy to another ; the supe- 
 riority of Tuscan pronunciation was now contested. He spoke 
 of Rosmini (whom he was anxious we should meet) as a 
 ' forte^tete.' ' His philosophy has too much pretension, but 
 his demolition of other philosophies is good.' This Manzoni 
 seemed to think was all that philosophy could do demolish 
 falsehood. 
 
 He recurred to doctrinal questions and said that what the 
 Pope pronounced he accepted, because he believed it true, 
 the Pope being infallible, but, as I understood, he would not 
 on a point of doctrine shrink from writing against or submit 
 to be silenced by his Bishop, any more than by any other 
 man, or suspend his judgment out of respect for him. ' Our 
 duty is to promulgate what we believe to be truth, and 
 nothing is to stop us but evidence against it. The Pope's 
 voice, however, is conclusive.' 
 
 To Miss S. Rogers. 
 
 'Genoa j) November 26, 1840. 
 
 \ *"^^ 
 Here I am at Genoa beginning to recover my temper 
 
 after a most offensive" journey from Milan in M. Bonafous's 
 diligence, said diligence having performed the journey (about 
 100 miles) in 40 hours, stopping at a dirty frontier Village 
 (25 miles from Milan) 9 hours, to wait for its corresponding 
 diligence to come up, we all this time being i^ miles from 
 Pavia and about seven from a most beautiful Chartreuse 
 which I could easily have seen if fTiaH grasped~triat we 
 were to wait half the time which we did. And this after 
 having made us start at 4 o'clock in the morning, and 
 arriving at the said frontier at 10 o'clock in the morning. I 
 started by diligence, leaving Hope to follow with a sick friend 
 (I am afraid consumptive) in hi^carriage, so as to see Genoa 
 before he comes up and be ready to start with him forthwith 
 for Leghorn. I expect him to-morrow evening 
 
 I don't think much happened at Milan after my last letter. 
 We called again on the Vitalis, of whom the sick one is 
 particularly anxious we should turn Romanists. He was
 
 1840 WINTER AT ROME 71 
 
 confined to his bed and I should be afraid was not likely to 
 get better. He took our hands one after another and begged 
 us quite pathetically to make ' un pas en avance ' ' je mour- 
 rais content.' We called in the evening and found his 
 brother sitting with a couple of clerical friends and Grossi the 
 author of ' Visconti,' who left as we came in ; and a very com- 
 fortable talk we had with these same black-frocked people 
 concerning matters in general, most of them plain, good, 
 straightforward people. I am much surprised to find they all 
 read Byron. I gave one of them (who has given me Manzoni's 
 hymns) Keble's ' Christian Year,' to improve his notions. We 
 are going "to send them Newman's ' Romanism ' and the 
 ' Tracts for the Times ' to crack their teeth upon. Most of \1 
 them are Ultramontanes, i.e. hold the strongest views of the 
 Pope's own private authority, except one jolly comfortable 
 Professor of Dogmatical Theology at the Seminary, who 
 wanted Hope to send him Paley's and all other Evidences he 
 could lay his hands on, and who settled Ultramontanism in a 
 most summary way ; little to the edification of the Vitalis 
 who were present ; finally asserting that they only held these 
 opinions as a theory, did not realise them, and if a case were 
 to arise when the Pope decided, and the body of the Church 
 hesitated to accept his decision, they (the Ultramontanes) 
 would not act up to their own principles, but would suspend 
 their own judgment too. The professors of the Seminary 
 have a billiard table, at which he was engaged when we called ; 
 and N.B., he is the only Italian who has offered us anything 
 to eat or drink, videlicet ' un cafe.' 
 
 We saw Manzoni once again, and while we were there 
 Grossi droppecT in, whose manner I liked much. If I had 
 stayed at Milan I should have tried to get really acquainted 
 with him. I have never felt my bad French such an impedi- 
 ment as since I have been in Italy. It is all very well tete a tete 
 to speak bad French and boggle, but in a company of clever 
 men who all speak with ease and fluency one must speak 
 readily or not at all. They so decidedly think we are going 
 to become Papists that I hatf feel as if I was sailing under 
 false colours. However, if people will draw conclusions for 
 themselves 'they must take the consequences.
 
 72 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. in 
 
 I am beginning to fire off Italian in conversation (tete a 
 tete} and comprehend tolerably when people speak to me 
 slowly, but my own sentences are sadly apt to miss fire. 
 Hope makes wonderful progress. I have not managed to 
 make the most of my time here ; have seen the three 
 principal collections, mounted the heights and gone a 
 little way out to sea, and the principal churches, but none 
 thoroughly the days are sadly short and I don't get up early 
 enough. 
 
 We start to-morrow evening for Civita Vecchia, staying 
 the greater part of the Sunday at Leghorn but starting 
 again in the evening. Watson, Hope's sick friend, is a 
 former ward of his father's, without father or mother, and 
 it is plainly a great object with him to get to the warm part 
 of Italy (which this is not) immediately, which makes us 
 press to Rome rather faster than we should otherwise. As 
 far as my own personal liking goes, I am glad of this, as I 
 want to get settled. 
 
 I am astonished to find how many Americans are to be 
 met. I met a third, a sculptor, yesterday morning. All that 
 travel seem ' Whigs,' which is in fact the kind of mercantile 
 aristocracy which is growing up, and is the American Con- 
 servative. . . . Hope and I take some credit to ourselves 
 for having spent some days (at least the greater part of them) 
 in the Ambrosian library collating for Pusey a MS. of a 
 treatise of Tertullian, which we have satisfactorily finished, 
 creating, I hope, in the Italians a creditable notion of Oxford 
 industry, seeing we flatter ourselves we knocked it off in 
 businesslike style. Dreadfully dull work, amounting princi- 
 pally to noting down all the errors of a stupid copyist. How- 
 ever, I rejoice to have done one useful thing here. 
 
 To Mrs. Rogers. 
 Rome, 60 Piazza Barberini : December 16, 1840. 
 
 To-day I have had a pleasant day, in spite of the 
 weather. I went with Richmond 4 to a Convent of St. Onofrio 
 where Tasso died, and of which I believe he was almost a 
 
 4 Mr. George Richmond, R.A.
 
 1840 WINTER AT ROME 73 
 
 member, which seems to me an uncommonly interesting 
 place, though I can scarce tell why. There are some beauti- 
 ful frescoes by a painter whose name I never heard till I 
 came here, but who seems to me (for devotional subjects) as 
 beautiful as almost anything I ever saw, by name Pinturicchio, 
 a fellow pupil with Raffaelle of Perugino. Almost all his 
 pictures that I have seen are of the Virgin, and much alike 
 and of the old stiff style, but all of them sweetness and purity 
 itself. Then I went with Richmond and his brother, and a Christ 
 Church man, by name Ruskin, again to the Vatican, and really 
 enjoyed it ; we did not attempt to look at more than two or 
 three of Raphael's frescoes, ' Heliodorus,' ' The School of 
 Athens,' ' The Dispute of the Sacrament ' (which perhaps you 
 don't know), and scarce anything else. Richmond was a very 
 great help to understanding the merit of what I saw, and 
 about these particular frescoes I do think I begin to feel as I 
 ought ; the tapestry (cartoons) and the loggia I still feel 
 wonderfully unable to appreciate. Soon after I got back, a 
 certain Dr. Baines, a great man about Bath, of whom you may 
 have heard, came to call on Hope, and rinding me only, 
 came in, and I had a pleasant talk with him for a short time. 
 I hear he has given offence to the Propaganda by what he 
 has done in England, and is kept here by them, much to his 
 own inconvenience. He calls himself on his card Vescovo di 
 Siga, but" really is coming, or rather has been, with episcopal 
 authority to England, claiming jurisdiction (among other 
 places) over part of what the Pope calls his diocese, Salisbury. 
 He is smooth, as many of the English Roman Catholics seem 
 to be. He said the Pope had told him of a variety of fine 
 things that Mehmet Ali was sending him, some mummies and 
 ' some 15 or 20 alabaster columns for St. Paul's, a new church 
 being built about \\ miles from Rome, and for which the 
 Emperor of Russia (though labouring under the Pope's indig- 
 nation for taking some thousands of his subjects slap over 
 from him to the Russian Church) is going to send an altar of 
 malachite or at least malachite for an altar. 
 
 December 17. 
 
 I found my letter getting so very dull last night, that I 
 left off till I had something more to say. To-day I went at
 
 74 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. in 
 
 half-past nine o'clock to see two Cardinals instituted, and I 
 . cannot say much for the process. It certainly did not im- 
 I press one with much sense of the majesty of Roman Catholi- 
 I cism. We first walked into the Consistory, where there 
 was a large assortment of priests, Englishmen and women, 
 and Swiss guard, and then took as good a place as we could 
 get, and waited till the Cardinals dropped in, which they did 
 one by one, each with his Chaplain, who sat himself down at the 
 Cardinal's feet, and an usher, who arranged for him his great' 
 violet-coloured silk train. Some of them were striking-look- 
 ing men, but scarce any, perhaps not more than two or three 
 I of those whose faces I saw, men who gave one the notion of 
 [ being what a cardinal ought to be. Presently we heard 
 some hymn being (well) sung outside, and in came the two 
 new Cardinals, who had (I should say) been half admitted on 
 Monday, and only had now to receive the hat The Pope 5 
 had just come'and sat himself down in his throne, in a great 
 gold tissue mitre (not triple crown) and wrapped up in a 
 rich crimson and gold mantle. All the Cardinals kissed hands, 
 and bowed themselves back to their places, their chaplains 
 performing genuflexions to the Pope, just as they do to the 
 altar. Then, as aforesaid, the new Cardinals came, kissed first, 
 the Pope's foot, then his hand, then his cheek. Then they 
 went round kissing all their brother Cardinals on each side of 
 their faces, or at least making as if they did ; an operation 
 which seemed very much to amuse all parties. I was standing 
 close behind the Cardinals' seats, like a footman at dinner, 
 within arm's length of their red caps, so that I had a good 
 sight of this process. The new Cardinals generally seemed 
 to have something pleasant to say to their senior friends ; I 
 could have fancied they took that opportunity of thanking 
 their friends for their good offices. However that may have 
 been, there was generally a laugh about the matter. Then 
 they went out, and a set of gentlemen in dresses I did not 
 understand presented a petition in Latin for the canonisation 
 of somebody, which occupied the time till they came back. 
 Then (we are informed by a Monsignore Baggs 6 to whom we 
 
 s Pope Gregory XVI. 
 
 * Monsignore Baggs was head of the English College at Rome.
 
 1840 (l WINDER AT ROME 
 
 were introduced) it was referred to the Committee of Rites to- 
 investigate the evidence for the miracles alleged to have 
 been performed, which are always a necessary preliminary 
 to canonisation. Then they came back with singing (I think) 
 again, and the Pope placed the hat on each of their heads suc- 
 cessively, with a form not unlike our form of conferring 
 degrees. And then all parties dispersed with singing again. 
 Hope was excessively disgusted at the whole affair. I not 
 much, because I did not expect much, but he had been 
 struck by a conversation he had with Overbeck the painter,. 
 an able, excellent man and enthusiastic Romanist (converted 
 from Protestantism), who had put before him a grand pictorial 
 view of His Holiness's acts, contrasting his power with the 
 divided helpless state of Protestant Churches. c An old man 
 sitting in the Vatican writes ten lines upon a piece of parch- 
 ment, and sends it forth, and all Christendom is moved ' 
 (meaning, I suppose, his allocution against the Emperor of 
 Russia) ; and then all this pompous external parade of Swiss 
 guard and purple gowns, with so very little appearance of 
 seriousness or solemnity, was rather an unexpected commentary 
 on Overbeck's little romance particularly to Hope, who has 
 an especial objection of his own to the mixture of temporal 
 and spiritual. 
 
 We4iave got hold of an uncommonly nice Italian master 
 named Armellini, full of fun. It is amusing to see how 
 obviously he has been used to work up lazy people ; his 
 whole system of teaching presupposes a state of the most 
 excessive indisposition to do anything in his pupil, and his 
 great aim accordingly to hammer the rules of grammar into 
 us in a way by ' which we shall not be annojati! He is full of 
 attacks on our countrymen and us (at a venture) for thinking 
 nothing good but what is English, and is in fine a very nice 
 clever merry little man. Hope, who picks up the language 
 from all quarters very quickly7"had used the word arrangiata 
 in his exercise, a word perfectly understood hereabouts, with 
 which A. found fault (as I had done before), and on Hope's 
 asking whether it was not Italian told us, 'Si dica si dica 
 ma non e Italiano, e lingua di Piazza di Spagna ' (the 
 place where the hotels and shops and English residents are).
 
 
 76 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. in 
 
 I am going to engage the captain of the Swiss guard, simply 
 to talk to me for an hour a day at the price of 3 pauls (about 
 is. 6d.} an hour, by which I expect to do wonders. I should 
 like to be able to talk Italian for the last month that I spend 
 here. I have been to-day to look at a very magnificent 
 church, St. John Lateran, and saw a list of relics which cer- 
 tainly petrified me. The list was in mosaic arid very old, 
 possibly 1,000 years ; probably the church does not profess to 
 possess them now. Not satisfied with St. John Baptist's camel's 
 hair girdle, fragments of five barley 'loaves, and the table on 
 which the last supper was eaten, they actually possess, in gold 
 and olive mosaic, two phials of the blood and water that came 
 from our Saviour's side ; also the ark of the covenant, two 
 tables of the Law, manna, and shewbread. The boy who 
 showed the curiosities showed me a large piece of porphyry 
 in the wall of the cloisters as the stone on which the soldiers 
 cast lots for our Lord's vesture, and there was an inscription 
 .showing that it professed to be so ; also a column of the 
 Jewish temple split at the time of our Saviour's crucifixion 
 and some columns with a slab on them professing to be ex- 
 actly of His height. 
 
 On Saturday, in the evening, I go to Lady Davy's, a very 
 good-natured person but not very wise, and fond of paying 
 herself compliments, which thing always embarrasses me to 
 such an extent that I can't get on with people who do it. 
 
 "*/ 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 Rome, 60 Piazza Barberini : December 20, 1840. 
 
 Lady Davy, Hope's friend, is lively (or rather perhaps talks 
 incessantly), very good-natured, clever in her way, and has lived 
 among distinguished people, and, being established as a lady 
 patroness of long standing at Rome, one meets pleasant people 
 at her house, but, unfortunately, in the particular article of 
 sense she is uncommonly lacking, at least as far as one sees 
 by mere company talk. I fancy she is to introduce me to 
 Madame Potemkin, the Russian Ambassadress, who ' receives ' 
 every Wednesday, and Hope tells me is a nice person. 
 
 I am getting to work pretty fairly at Italian, besides
 
 1840 WINTER AT ROME 77 
 
 Armellini twice a week ; every morning I have a man to talk 
 for an hour named Pfyffer, attached to the Pope's Swiss guard 
 and a regular gossip. His family have been in the Papal guard 
 for 200 years, and are descended from ' the great Ludovic ' 
 Pfyffer, who was general of the forces of Lucerne in the battle 
 of something. 7 He gives a most miserable account of the 
 parish clergy, even more in the country than in the city, as 
 drunken &c.,but praises much the Dominicans and Capuchins 
 (mendicants), and only abuses the Jesuits (which he does hand- 
 somely) for being intriguing and ambitious and successful. 
 He abuses also the Cardinals, but praises much a certain 
 Cardinal Micara, a Capuchin, Bishop of Frascati, who continues 
 all the rigour of a monastic life still, and has got his bishopric 
 into very good order, but has so set against him the other 
 Cardinals by his measures of reform that he now never appears 
 at Rome, but confines himself to his own see, dining with the 
 pupils in the seminary, performing his visitations on his mule, 
 sleeping on a straw mattress, and castigating his clergy. We 
 project a visit to him to look what manner of man he is. Hope 
 does not get much out of his Jesuits, though he much ~lik'es(' 
 the Father General, and has gone the length of asking him 
 (r) how it is that the Jesuits have managed to bring down upon 
 themselves such universal suspicion, and (2) \vhether it is not 
 bad policy to give them all that bland manner and downcast 
 look which is peculiar to them. The Father General answers : 
 (i) 'Blessed are ye when men speak eviTof you/ and (2) that 
 courtesy and modesty are Christian virtues, and of the latter 
 modesty of the eyes is a great part. They seem to be con- 
 sidered as the movers of almost all that goes on here. I think 
 I mentioned that at the time of the cholera, when the other 
 priests held back, they came forward and exposed themselves 
 most brilliantly, being everywhere and doing everything. 
 
 We have seen several ceremonies, (i) conferring the hat 
 
 7 This seems to refer to Colonel Pfiffer, and the Queen Mother at Meaux and 
 
 Ffyfter, or Pfeiffer, surnamed ' Roi des convoyed them to Paris ; and he fought 
 
 Suisses,' born at Lucerne in 1530. He at Jarnac and at Moncontour. After 
 
 took service with the French and wards he went home to Lucerne and 
 
 fought both in Piedmont and in France. held various offices in the Confedera- 
 
 He commanded, it is said, 6,000 Swiss tion. 
 in 1567, when he rescued Charles IX.
 
 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. in 
 
 on two Cardinals, (2) consecrating of a Bishop (or at least 
 part), (3) ordination of about one or two hundred men to the 
 six other orders (Priest, Deacon, Sub-deacon, Acolyte, Reader, 
 Door-keeper), and tonsure by the Bishop, (4) High Mass 
 before the Pope at the Sistine Chapel, (5) a mass for the Prin- 
 cess Borghese, and English sermon in her honour by Dr. 
 Baggs, head of the English College here, whom we know. I 
 cannot say that their ceremonies impress me : they strike me 
 as mere scenery. The music in the Sistine Chapel and the 
 ' Dies Irae ' &c. in the Mass for the Princess Borghese were cer- 
 tainly very beautiful, but the whole affair was so decidedly by 
 way of being a sight that it altogether left a very unsatisfactory 
 impression on my mind. And so much are the Roman 
 Catholic services intended to be looked atTnoTTTterally joined 
 in, that a portable Latin [service book ?] is a thing which is 
 not to be got in Rome. The careless way in which Protestants 
 crowd to see the sight is bad, and perhaps it is that in a great 
 measure which prevents one from feeling the solemnity of what 
 is going on, but I cannot help thinking that Roman Catholics 
 do very much the same, and are practically (though not of 
 course in theory) expected to do so ; this, however, may be un- 
 charitable. Certainly Rome strikes me as the least devotional 
 of any Roman Catholic city I have been in. I do think if I 
 wanted to stop my own self from turning Romanist, Rome is 
 the place I should fix myself in. 
 
 I" was a good deal amused the other day by going over a 
 Carthusian Church (Santa Maria degli Angeli, constructed by 
 Michel Angelo out of the old baths of Domitian) with one of 
 the monks, a Frenchman named Father Bruno, evidently most 
 proud, first of his order, which he said was the only one which 
 had never had to be reformed, secondly of his convent, its pic- 
 tures and relics (which were, for the most part, more unpre- 
 tending, and had more appearance of genuineness than those 
 at St. John Lateran), and thirdly of his own countrymen in 
 the convent. It seems their rule is only to leave the walls 
 of the convent once a week. This the Italian monks com- 
 plained of as impracticable, and begged for dispensation ac- 
 cordingly ; however, Father Bruno and five other French 
 monks were sent for, who have kept the rules rigorously, to
 
 1840 WINTER AT ROME 79 
 
 the no small triumph of the said Bruno. They have each three 
 rooms, a small garden, and a fine airy cloister to walk in, with 
 plenty of orange trees. I asked Father Bruno a question of 
 Church's, whether private friendships were discouraged, an idea 
 which he rather contemptuously repelled, telling me that his 
 order did not perform any ' capuchinades,' and that all their 
 penances and exercises were such as were plainly improving. 
 But it turned out that their opportunities for private friendship 
 are not very great, as they only meet (for purposes of conversa- 
 tion &c.) on Sundays (at least, so I understood) unless there 
 was some peculiar reason, when they asked leave of the prior 
 to see each other : their spiritual director, however, they 
 might always see. They eat no meat, and often, as e.g. for the 
 whole of Advent and Lent, have only one meal a day, and get 
 up for two or three hours for service at midnight. OTree*there \ 
 was a notion that the maigre diet was unwholesome, and the 
 Pope thought of relaxing this rule, but they sent up a deputa- 
 tion of men between 80 and 120, the very sight of whom con- 
 vinced him that no reform was necessary. Father Bruno 
 says there are not to be found in the world such a set of 
 healthy, long-lived men as the Carthusians. He himself is cer- 
 tainly a good portly specimen: 
 
 I wish you could see the servant we are condemned to, 
 Maria by name, commonly called about the house ' Mariuccia.' 
 Our padrona tells us she is given to drink, and certainly she 
 never recollects any one thing we tell her by any chance, and 
 then all we get on remonstrance is ' Ah, oggi abbi pazienza,' 
 an expression which was supplicatory at first, but which is 
 fast becoming admonitory, a piece of impertinence which 
 moves my wrath ; for though I know that patience is a great 
 virtue, and an incapable servant is a capital exercise for it, 
 still that is hardly the particular view of the case which one 
 expects to have enforced on one by the criminal herself. I 
 am to go to bed, so goodbye to you all. I hope you had 
 a merry Christmas and will have a happy New Year. Love 
 to all. 
 
 Ever your affectionate brother, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS. 
 
 P.S. I told you in my last that our padrona has been very
 
 8o LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. in 
 
 ill. She is now well again, and came into our room the other 
 day to pay us her compliments, sat down and told us the his- 
 tory of her illness, which was an ' arrabbiatura ' with a lodger, 
 who she conceived had treated her ill, and she thought it 
 fitting to be so ' arrabbiata ' with him that it brought on a 
 fever. Richmond tells us it is a recognised form of illness 
 with Italians, and that all of them under such an infliction will 
 tell you their case, and expect condolences and obliging in- 
 quiries, just as much as if they called it nervous depression or 
 spleen. 
 
 To Miss M. Rogers. 
 
 Rome : December 31, 1840. 
 
 My dear Marian, I suppose my letters from Rome have 
 somewhat set your heart at rest about the present chance 
 of our turning Romanists. However, we got into a scrape 
 yesterday evening at Lady Davy's. Hope, who is a sharp 
 ready fellow, but who has not in any degree read up the 
 controversy, thought fit (for which I have not yet nearly 
 forgiven him) to plunge himself, in full conclave, into a 
 controversy with Bishop Baines on our very most vulnerable 
 point, the formal correctness of the proceedings at the Reforma- 
 tion, a point at which the Roman Catholics have laboured 
 a good deal just at present, and which Bishop Baines plainly 
 had crammed. I was talking with Sir G. Clerk next to him, 
 and to my horror I heard what was going on and somewhat 
 weakly stopped for a moment to listen and in a very slight 
 way joined. I don't consider that I made a mess of it as far 
 as my share went, which was merely putting in a word here 
 and there to stop a thrust of old Baines, but it had the effect 
 of increasing the audience, which was bad, and I must say 
 that Hope, who was the combatant, must have seemed, though 
 he was never fairly floored, to have the worst of it, and left 
 on the minds of the spectators the impression that ' Puseyism ' 
 could not defend itself against Popery. I had no pity on him 
 at all, and, after listening for some little time, fairly burst 
 through the ring and retreated, having, as Hope declares with 
 very much indignation, been looking blue and green and 
 black for half an hour before. He declares I used him
 
 1840 WINTER AT ROME 81 
 
 abominably, showing all the world that I thought him floored, 
 but ' Que diable allait-il faire dans cette galere ? ' May it be a 
 lesson to him ! Baines is a clever fellow, thoroughly fluent 
 and courteous, knows exactly wherrhe has made a point and 
 hammers it in. I hope this is a sufficient expiation for a 
 certain exultation which I confess we did feel over the spiritual 
 director at Milan. 
 
 I think I told you of the Carthusian Convent I went 
 over with Hope and my friend Father Bruno. I suppose 
 it is quite the case that they live very austere lives, but 
 the horrors of their continual jours maigres are somewhat 
 softened to me by hearing from my friend Mr. Pfyffer that 
 turtle was allowed, that it was part of the ordinary food, and 
 that they kept a stock of turtle in a pond or something of the 
 kind on the premises. Also I was a good deal interested by 
 a Franciscan convent which I went over with a lay brother, 
 who had narrowly missed being sent as missionary to 
 Jerusalem, a nice fellow (not of the lower class) but, it 
 appeared to me, rather ashamed of his religion, which was not 
 so well. 
 
 I have been trying this morning to get out of my scandal- 
 monger all that I can about the state of parties among the 
 ecclesiastical authorities here, which is not very much. I 
 expected to find that the division was one of political views, 
 i.e. that some Cardinals might be more liberal or more severe 
 in reforming, or more disposed to exert Church authority 
 against Kings of Prussia and Czars of Russia than the rest, 
 but from all I can make out the division of the conclave 
 appears to be between the Genoese and the Roman Party ; 
 the contest in the next Papal election is considered to lie 
 between a Cardinal Patrizzi, who is the candidate of the latter, 
 and Franzoni of the former interest. The latter is now at 
 the head of the Propaganda (which is worked by the Jesuits), 
 and both are said to be good men, but neither clever. My 
 friend who is very anxious to see the Romans educated, 
 streets improved, thievery and dirt put down, the country 
 tilled, and so on says neither of them is sharp enough, 
 ' buonissimi, ma buoni per niente,' as temporal governors of 
 Rome. He would like to see Cardinal Micara Pope, who 
 
 G
 
 82 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. m 
 
 from his Capuchin education has ' seen the world ' down to the 
 dregs, and would unite the requisites of being an honest man 
 and being up to the rogues. However, he would please 
 no party. 8 Austria, France, Spain, and Portugal have, it 
 seems, a veto on the -election of the Pope, which is exercised 
 in a curious way. The Cardinals, each with a chaplain and a 
 
 \ servant, are turned into the Tope's palace to elect a new one ; 
 the entrance (as I understand) is walled up, their dinner sent 
 to them through a kind of turnstile, and no one allowed to 
 speak to them except through a ' grille ' and in the presence 
 of witnesses ; then each of these four Powers has a Cardinal 
 in their confidence who has a list of the persons to be vetoed, 
 and if on collecting the votes any one of the forbidden seems 
 to be getting a majority of votes as it comes near the critical 
 moment he puts in his veto and a fresh start is made. But if 
 any candidate has once got his majority it is too late forThe 
 vetoist, and he is Pope in spite of Austria's or any one else's 
 objection. So if a majority of Cardinals quite understand each 
 
 ( other, it has happened that they have been very sharp in 
 their proceedings and whipped out all their votes before the 
 gentleman with the veto in his pocket knew what they were 
 up to, and so got in their candidate, and left him with his nose 
 in the air. I believe the present Cardinals bear a fair character, 
 and a few of them are said to be very good men indeed. I 
 have heard Mezzofanti, the Cardinal who can talk fifty-six 
 languages like fifty-six natives, spoken of as a man who 
 would give the very shirt off his back in alms. His first 
 discovery of his own talent for languages was, it is said, 
 owing to his vehement wish to be of use as confessor to the 
 mixture of all nations which composed the French army in 
 the North of Italy when he was a poor priest at Bologna. 
 He had great offers to take him thence, but refused them all 
 till the Pope commanded him to Rome. They say that 
 except in that one point he is not a clever man. My paper 
 is finished, so goodbye to you. 
 
 Yours affectionately, 
 
 F. R. 
 
 s Gregory XVI. did not die till 1846. Lambruschini and Cardinal Mastai 
 when the contest lay between Cardinal Ferretti (Plus IX.).
 
 1841 WINTER AT ROME . 83 
 
 To Rev. J. H. Newman. 
 
 Rome : January 16, 1841. 
 
 My dear Newman, Very many thanks for your most 
 acceptable letter, especially, as always, for what you say about 
 yourself. I don't remember what I said against Rome which 
 you think wrong fTTiope it was nothing insolent, or flippant, 
 or self-congratulatory. I must own however to a strong 
 aversion from her present form,' which has been growing on 
 me ever since I have been here. It is a wretched thing to be 
 travelling among foreign Churches with the feeling that one 
 must see faults in them in order to justify our own (Anglican) 
 position ; and I know I have had that feeling about me 
 very strongly, and I dare say it has made me say things more 
 bitterly than I ought to have done, particularly, I am afraid, 
 in letters I have written since yours. All I can say is, I have 
 tried not to allow it to make me believe lies. It is a little 
 cruel of you to talk in that quiet way about inserting my 
 ' most merciless criticism ' on Sewell, 9 whose explosion is 
 certainly most amusing. I shall be anxious to know if he 
 deigns to express any feeling about it ; for you make me 
 remorseful. 
 
 I am very sorry to hear what you say about Bowden's 
 feeling the winter. Cannot he get away ? 
 
 As to my own proceedings, I am sorry to say I am as idle 
 as ever, and begin to give up all hopes of being anything 
 better while I am here. However, the last two or three days 
 have been more worth having than anything I have seen before 
 here. Hope has got himself introduced to a certain priest 
 named Pentini, who is concerned in an interesting system of 
 retraites for the poorer classes and soldiers, of which he is 
 to show us the whole history ; and on Tuesday he took us over 
 the building, and gave us a lecture upon their proceedings. 
 They are a society of twelve priests, incorporated by the Pope, 
 but quite independent, with twelve (or more) working men 
 
 9 This alludes, apparently, to a had written him an account in a letter 
 scheme of Professor Sewell's for con- published in Dean Church's Life and 
 verting the Irish, of "which Mr. Church Letters, p. 26. 
 
 G 2
 
 84 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. in 
 
 (without authority) under them, who simply buy a house large 
 enough to accommodate about seventy people, with beds, a 
 kitchen, a chapel and oratory, lecture room, and yard to walk in ; 
 catch their seventy men, partly with, partly againsttheir will, and 
 then inflict upon them eight or nine days of preaching, silence, 
 meagre diet, finishing with confession and communion. When 
 we went through the house they had got some fifty or sixty 
 soldiers in hand. They came, we were told, of their own free 
 will ; but those who would not come of their own free will 
 were forced to come. It seemed to me from his account as if 
 it were fairly part of the military discipline to send them all 
 once in so many years. When they went out, a batch (muta) 
 of townsmen were to come in ; and so, Pentini said, about 
 twelve or fifteen hundred people passed through their hands 
 during the year, with, on the whole, the very best results. 
 Sometimes, he told us, men were sent who were known to 
 cherish certain evil intentions, in order to have them worked 
 out of them ; and he showed us a stiletto hidden in a pipe, 
 which had been given up after a few days of their discipline 
 by a man who had been sent to them as known to be planning 
 revenge on another. The society was self-elected, with no 
 necessary connexion with the parochial system, and each 
 ' muta ' required seven priests to manage it, the whole being 
 divided into four roomfuls, and none ever left alone. Pentini 
 himself seems a thoroughly earnest simple-hearted little man, 
 apparently anxious to show everything, from the firm faith he 
 has in its excellence ; so I hope we shall see a good deal 
 there. 
 
 Also I have been much amused at a dinner which we had 
 at a convent of Franciscans at Albano, under the guidance of 
 a certain tame deacon who is in Hope's employ, and whom I 
 confess I respect as little as well may be, he being a regular 
 ' Graeculus esuriens,' who professes himself ready to spend 
 ' even his life ' in Hope's service, and whom the said Hope has 
 been obliged to prohibit from lying on his behalf, the man 
 urging that profitable as well as jocose lies, ' bugie avvantag- 
 giose,' are only venial sins, and therefore not to be accounted 
 of. He ' fouls his own nest,' like Pugin, not a little. I can't 
 make up my mind whether to be civil or rude to him ; so
 
 1841 WINTER AT ROME 85 
 
 alternate between the two, and catch it from my conscience 
 both ways. 
 
 However, such as he is, he took us to Albano, and got us 
 the above-mentioned dinner, and a very respectable one it was : 
 we dined in the refectory, sitting all round the room with our 
 backs to the wall. Three plates of meat (one being added 
 on account of a feast-day), soup, cheese, and fruit. I can't say 
 much for their polish or devotion (at grace), but they seemed 
 to be good-humoured, and to be good friends with one another, 
 and it was quite edifying to see the energy with which the 
 whole convent set to work, when they had finished their own 
 dinner, trying to make one or two pet cats jump for the re- 
 mainder ; the said cats, however, utterly neglecting the whole 
 set of them in favour of one very dirty old lay brother, appa- 
 rently the porter, to the infinite amusement of the unsuccess- 
 ful aspirants. 
 
 To Mrs. Rogers. 
 
 Rome : January 26, 1841. 
 
 My dear Mother, 1 think of leaving this place on 
 February 25, going slowly to Florence by Terni, Perugia, 
 Lake Thrasymene, Spoleto, and Arezzo, staying ten days 
 or a fortnight at Florence, then a day at Pisa, then home 
 by the Cornice road through Genoa (without stopping), Nice, 
 Avignon, up the Rhone and down the Seine, and home, I hope, 
 so as to spend Passion Week with you. 
 
 Richmond has just started back for England, to my grief, 
 as I have not seen near as much in his company as I should 
 have wished, especially in and about the Vatican. However, 
 I hope to renew our acquaintance in London, and I shall get 
 him down to Blackheath and make him give Kate some 
 advice. I still have a few great sights in Rome unseen, but 
 I think I have now nearly gone through all after a fashion 
 and have before me principally the pleasant part of revisiting 
 in Rome, and making a few excursions to the neighbour- 
 hood. 
 
 Yesterday, Mr. Leslie Melville took us to call on Waterton 
 the naturalist, of South American crocodile reputation He
 
 86 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. m 
 
 showed us his stuffed birds, both finished and in hand. Hope 
 asked about his terrible South American poison, whether it 
 would kill cold-blooded animals. He said it would kill turtles, 
 which are the animals most tenacious of life that he knew : 
 ' Why, sir, there was a turtle that I had skinned and taken 
 out his inside, and put in the glass eyes, and steeped him in 
 corrosive sublimate several hours ; Lord, sir, the next morning 
 the animal bit my finger.' Also I was much amused at a 
 history he gave me of his having gone into the Jesuits' church 
 'to say a few prayers' (he is, as he says, 'a good deal addicted 
 to Popery,' i.e. the most thorough-going Roman Catholic in 
 Rome), he put down his hat and went through his devotions, 
 but found, when he rose, that a fellow had carried off his good 
 hat, and left instead an old thing that he could hardly bear to 
 put on his head ; and then, on complaining to a Jesuit friend, 
 all the consolation he got was the observation that he had only 
 fulfilled one half of the Divine precept ' Watch and pray.' I 
 will venture to say the Jesuit himself (Hope's friend G.) never 
 fell into a similar omission. 
 
 On coming home from hearing Mozart's Requiem (January 
 28) I have just found Marian's letter, for which thank her 
 very much. I had done very much what she seems inclined 
 to in the matter of music, in which I shall invest a few 
 pounds. I have ordered Pergolesi, also some trios of Clari's 
 for S. C. B. I shall not stay here beyond Easter unless I 
 receive a volunteer pressure thereto from Oxford (which I 
 don't think likely) with assurance of the Provost's sanction, 
 though, as you may suppose, I lick my lips a little at the 
 thought of an Italian spring. I really have so wasted my 
 time here that I don't feel as if I had earned any longer stay 
 here. If I felt I was doing any good, getting up my subjects 
 in a producible shape, &c., &c., it would be another thing. I 
 think I was right in coming out here on the plea of health, 
 but without either that or useful occupation I don't think 
 Oriel Fellows ought to be amusing themselves about Italy. I 
 may as well say, to prevent you from getting up an Oxford 
 recommendation to me to stay, that a letter in answer to 
 this cannot reach me here, and if I got as far as Florence on 
 my way home I should not stop. I don't myself regret the
 
 1841 WINTER AT ROME 87 
 
 loss of the Holy Week, for really the Roman Catholic ceremo- 
 nies are so theatrical that I have no satisfaction in them and 
 reproach myself for going (as I have done) simply to hear the 
 music and see the sight. I have been as full of engagements 
 here as you have been for the last fortnight; I don't think I have 
 had three evenings without some engagement or other, ball, 
 dinner, or evening party. The gayest balls I have been at 
 are Madame Potemkin's yesterday week (Wednesday), the 
 Russian ambassadress. But they are things which I confess 
 bore me considerably, insomuch that last night I was fairly 
 too lazy to go to one which I believe was rather a splendid 
 sight, and for which I had had to buy a ticket on the Capitol. 
 
 To Rev. J. H. Newman. 1 
 
 Rome : January 30, 1841. 
 
 My dear Newman, I quite own that I am disposed to fix 
 upon the faults of Rome. I "know I have long felt so, ever 
 since I began to feel that the controversy between ourselves 
 and Rome was really pressing, and since I have ' fancied ' that 
 high estimate of her advantages was leading to a scorn of our 
 own church. And I cannot complain of being distrusted on 
 that account ; I distrust myself, I know I am very likely not to 
 observe their merits, or to give them proper weight. But I 
 do think you are a little hard on my honesty when you set me 
 aside as simply ' disqualified to be a witness of facts against 
 her.' And again I think you are mistaken in thinkifig that it 
 is ''their demureness ' or ' their minute ceremonial ' merely 
 that is setting me against them. However, I will not inflict 
 justifications on you, particularly as I have just plucked a 
 letter which I had nearly finished to you for containing near 
 two pages of them. 
 
 First, will you thank Pusey from Hope for his letter to him, 
 and say that H. will write to him when anything is settled ? 
 From what he hears here, he thinks it will be difficult to get 
 a good travelling collator ; perhaps it will be necessary to get 
 one from Germany. 
 
 1 This letter is in answer to one from which is printed in Letters and Corre- 
 Newman, dated January 10, 1841, ;ponde>ice, ii. 323.
 
 88 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. in 
 
 February 2. Since writing the above I have heard from 
 poor Abeken ' that Lutheran ' as you remorselessly call him 
 that a certain Dr. Huyse (?), who has done some collations of 
 Tertullian's ' Apologeticus,' would be a good and a likely man 
 to be travelling rummager, and that being a Roman Catholic 
 would not be any advantage except in Rome, and not very 
 material here. However, all this H. will write about. I will 
 bring home the collation of the ' Apologeticus.' 
 
 Hope has been rather taken with Bishop Baines of late, in 
 spite of their encounter. We had a long and interesting talk 
 with him during an hour and a halfs walking up and down 
 the Corso, and divers other public places where he would most 
 effectually spoil our characters by being seen with us. It was 
 in part the other aspect (I conclude) of what you at Oxford 
 heard from Pugin. He was summoned here (by the Propa- 
 ganda,) for that Pastoral of his which we heard of in England, 
 which certainly seems pretty strong against Mr. Spencer's 
 prayers for the conversion of England in particular, and against 
 new converts in general under that name. The charge attacks 
 them for being abusive, and for setting afloat practices un- 
 necessarily affronting to the English. And he complained to 
 us in the same way of injudicious hot-headed people who would 
 do just what was most shocking to English prejudices silly 
 books of devotion (as respecting the ' Sacred Heart of Jtsus ') 
 over which the Bishop unfortunately had no control. ' Some ' 
 (of the ' converts ') ' filled with the presumption of their ancient 
 sect, and strangers to the humility of the religion ' they have 
 embraced, commence their career by dictating to their spiritual 
 rulers,' is his opinion on the unlucky converts. He is said 
 (by his friends) to have gained a complete victory here, but 
 the mere fact of having been kept here some months from his 
 district seems something of a punishment. He spoke as if the 
 old jealousies between seculars and regulars (Jesuits especially) 
 were rising again, and especially on the subject of advowsons. 
 
 I hear from a friend of his (a Mr. Colyar, Roman Catholic) 
 that there is some expectation of bringing the Abyssinian 
 Churches into the Roman Communion. They have been in 
 the habit of buying a patriarch when they wanted one from 
 Mehemet AH ; the last he sent was a very bad one, a regular
 
 1841 WINTER AT ROME 89 
 
 scamp, and, accordingly, when they found him out they deposed 
 him : but Mehemet AH would not take him back again, or, 
 of course, give them another, so that all the functions of the 
 Patriarch remained unperformed. Accordingly they have sent 
 an embassy to Rome to say that they have always been in 
 the habit of praying for the Pope, and that they hope he will 
 send them one. Mr. C. winks and says he suspects there 
 were some Jesuits in the neighbourhood. However, the 
 Abyssinians are here, and delivered a discourse at the Propa- 
 ganda at the Epiphany, when orations or poems were recited 
 in some forty or fifty different languages I believe, a most 
 curious exhibition some of them. I have a suspicion this may 
 be an old story to you. 
 
 The said Mr. C. also took us to call on a certain 
 Cardinal Micara, of whom I think I have spoken before a 
 Cardinal who lives a Capuchin life, with no state, in the 
 seminary of his diocese (Frascati), the myths of him being 
 (i) that he has quarrelled with the whole Conclave, and will not 
 enter their ' Congregations ' till they have put down a certain 
 Government lottery which exists here ; (2) that if he were 
 Pope he would drive all heretics out of Rome forthwith. The 
 facts are that he does attend the Congregations, and is not 
 likely to be Pope. All seem agreed, however, that he has 
 talent enough for most things, and daring for anything. Hope 
 and I, now we have seen him, can't quite agree what kind of 
 man he is. He seems to occupy himself with all manner of 
 subjects : Russian statistics and the state of the marshes about 
 Rome were the two which we came across ; also he is fond of 
 fine paintings, and said to be a great theologian, but with all 
 this, I thought, was a curious absence of refinement and 
 dignity. Almost all the conversation was between him and 
 Mr. Colyar (as was not unnatural, seeing Italian was the 
 language spoken), and he carried it on in a kind of nudging, 
 familiar, jocose way, which H. ascribed to shyness or to 
 his not having made up his mind how to deal with us : I 
 chiefly to a Capuchin education. I have seldom seen a person 
 who gave me the idea of having much more ' go ' in him. 
 Mr. C. said that at one time the only English words he 
 knew were ' Will you box ? ' learnt from an Irish Capuchin,
 
 90 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. in 
 
 and with these he greeted the said Colyar whenever he called. 
 He seemed to make me understand more than I ever did 
 before great men whom one reads of, as carrying through life 
 with them, through all their greatness, what the conventions 
 of the world call somewhat low tastes. 
 
 I don't know why I have gone on prosing about this man, 
 whom I have only seen once, except that he interested me a 
 good deal, and that I have little else to say, and that I have 
 given you data sufficient to set my opinions at their proper 
 value a piece of consideration, by the way, which I suspect 
 you don't always give me due credit for, though really I don't 
 know why I should say so, for I feel that what you say of my 
 uncharitablencss is just. 
 
 Hope asks whether you knew that a German Protestant 
 named Dressel is bringing out here from the Vatican manu- 
 scripts (part only of which, it is said, Jacobson saw) a new 
 edition of the Apostolical Fathers. The said Dressel has 
 also taken a great deal of pains with collations of an edition 
 of Prudentius which he wants to bring out, but it is question- 
 able whether he has money enough to publish it himself. I 
 have said I would suggest to you whether it could be made 
 any use of for the ' Library of the Fathers.' He is a man well 
 thought of here, for character and accuracy, by those who 
 speak of him, has worked his eyes out, and is in distress. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS. 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 Rome : February 6, 1841. 
 
 I must allow I shall not be sorry to get rid of Rome. 
 The bad weather and continual parties, and calls on persons I 
 shall probably never see again, have fairly tired me out. I 
 feel as if when I began to move I must have some fine 
 weather. I met at a party the other day M. Bethmann 
 Holwegg, owner of the Castle of Rheineck at the mouth of 
 the valley of the Brohl, which you probably recollect, and he 
 recognised me as having been civil to him at Oxford ; so 
 we greeted most amiably, and have exchanged invitations. 
 He is an eminent man in his line (civil law).
 
 1841 WINTER AT ROME 91 
 
 We paid our visits to the Cardinals Micara and Mezzo- 
 fanti. Micara was a vivacious old fellow with a kind of 
 Capuchin good humour about him, but, with all his vivacity, 
 capable, I could quite believe, of packing all heretics clean 
 out of Rome, as some people say he would do if he were 
 Pope. He would have made a capital picture with his red 
 cap, Capuchin dress, long white beard, and bright keen eye. 
 (I am afraid our going over to Frascati to look at him is quite 
 out of the question.) And the Capuchin establishment in 
 which he lives is a magnificent affair in extent, though of 
 course as plain as possible in details, and quite unornamented. 
 There is something, however, to me about the long corridors 
 and quadrangles of the convent which is very grand and 
 taking. Mezzofanti (the owner of the forty or sixty languages, 
 I forget which) is a very courteous man, who talked English 
 to us most fluently all the time we were with him, but without 
 any particular talent. 
 
 February 9. All plans to the right about face. I have 
 just received a letter from Church insisting that there is no 
 manner of necessity for my coming home for Easter, so I 
 have indited a letter to the Provost, asking for more leave 
 of absence, which I shall use to see Carnival here, then I 
 think Naples, then through Rome again to Florence and 
 Venice. So you may continue to address your letters here 
 till the 4th or 5th of March, then write to Florence. One 
 letter, perhaps, will have gone there as it is. 
 
 I have fallen across Mrs. Somerville several times lately, 
 and like her uncommonly. I never met such an unaffected 
 person with so much in her. Lady Adam is always exceed- 
 ingly cordial, as she seems to be to all the English, but some- 
 how I never find that we have more than a few words to say 
 to one another ; very empresste always but not much of it. 
 And I am afraid last night I made rather a hole in my 
 manners by staying after everybody else (but the Somervilles) 
 talking to Mrs. S. By the way I dined last night with a very 
 taking old German soldier, a Count Briihl, come to accom- 
 modate the Cologne affair, which they say here the King of 
 Prussia wishes to have settled at almost any time. The party 
 was only Hope, Count B., a M. Reumont, secretary of the
 
 92 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. in 
 
 Prussian Legation, and myself, and a very pleasant evening 
 we passed till it was time to be off for our respective evening 
 engagements. 
 
 I have got rather a curiosity for you in the shape of an 
 Italian love letter, written by the scrivano at the bottom of 
 our staircase. I had suggested the notion to Hope, who 
 accordingly, being the impudent man of the party, must needs 
 one fine morning begin feeling his way towards getting the 
 said letter, with our bland but tremendous 'padrona.' 'A 
 good honest fellow the scrivano.' ' Yes.' ' How did he get 
 on in the world ? What did he do ? Presumed he wrote a 
 great many letters ? ' ' Yes.' ' Letters for the contadini of 
 all sorts ? ' ' Yes, of all sorts.' ' From father to children, 
 brothers, sisters, friends, &c. ? ' ' Yes, all that come ; fathers, 
 brothers, everybody else.' ' And lovers if they come to him ? ' 
 ' Ah ! ma non cattive lettere, non scrive mai cattive lettere, 
 uomo scrupolosissimo always takes care that the letters he 
 writes should be " oneste lettere." ' And it came too clear to 
 be mistaken that the unfortunate Hope in one short moment 
 had entirely knocked down all the little reputation we have 
 scraped together during the last two months for steadiness 
 and respectability, and was believed to have the most 
 iniquitous designs on the poor scrivano's handiwork. How- 
 ever, on mentioning the story to my friend M. Pfyffer, he 
 instantly volunteered to get the thing done, as he does every- 
 thing else, and accordingly in two days we were in possession of 
 a most approved specimen of the article required (' ma non 
 cattiva,' implying honourable proposals), with all manner of 
 illustrations plain and coloured. 
 
 To Frederick L. Rogers, Esq. 
 
 Naples : March 9, 1841. 
 
 My dear Father, I have bid good-bye, almost for good, 
 to Rome, without much regret. I have made one or two 
 acquaintances that I like, but the chances are so much against 
 my being thrown across them again that one does not gain 
 much. In the last fe\v days I made some acquaintances that 
 I have liked as much as any people I have met at Rome,
 
 1841 WINTER AT ROME 93 
 
 through a certain Oxford man named Anderdon ; a certain 
 German Count and Countess Hohenthal with her sister, a 
 Princess Biron, good-natured, warm-hearted, and I should 
 think superior people, and the ladies with the additional 
 advantage of being very pretty. Mrs. Somerville's praises I 
 think I have sung before. These are a few among some 
 thirty or forty houses where I did leave or ought to have left 
 P.P.C.s on leaving Rome. I have left a sad number of things 
 unseen, my only consolation when people cross-questioned 
 me being that I have dropt into one sight which is worth 
 seeing, and extremely difficult to see, being the Villa Ludovici, 
 including a magnificent statue gallery of the Prince Piombino, 
 a man who refuses admittance to everybody, even Chantrey 
 the sculptor, and the Pope ! The Hohenthals, however, 
 managed to get admittance for a party, to which Anderdon 
 appended me ; which was the beginning of our acquaintance. 
 
 I have been posting here with two Swintons, one a rising 
 Scotch advocate, a very nice, frank, honest-hearted, fellow as 
 possible, knows the Pringles of Yare, and Sir W. Scott's 
 family well ; but I can't make out much of our other Scotch 
 friends ; he has come abroad for his health, and brings with 
 him his brother, who has insisted on taking up painting as a 
 profession. The advocate meditates a visit to Oxford, where 
 I shall like much to see him. One youth was a wild man 
 
 from Ireland by name C , utterly unlicked, but most 
 
 entirely good-natured and charitable to all the world except 
 towards a little tuft-hunting tutor of Lord Gifford's (who is 
 travelling here) who has apologised to him, C , for not intro- 
 ducing him to society at Rome according to a supposed promise 
 at Florence ; ' accursed villain,' ' infernal valet de place,' and 
 such like, are among the epithets eulogistic which the remem- 
 brance of the insult elicits whenever it occurs to him, which it 
 does almost twice a day. 
 
 We had three beautiful days for our journey here, which 
 was for the most part along Horace's iter ad Brundisium, for 
 writing which travellers to Naples should thank him much. 
 The first day stopped at Albano to lionise, and slept at 
 Cisterna (Tres Tabernae in Acts xxviii.), next day lionised 
 Tarracina, ' impobitum saxis candentibus (now red) Anxur,'
 
 94 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. in 
 
 lost Swinton's baggage from behind the carriage at Itri, a 
 place famous for brigands, and had to pay a couple of scudi 
 to some country people who had found it (probably before it 
 was lost) on the road ; and slept like Horace at Mola di 
 Gaeta, under the Formian Hills and on the site (it is said) of 
 the Villa where Cicero was killed. The third day a beautiful 
 journey under the hills to Capua, and so to Naples. 
 
 To Rev, J. H. Newman. 
 
 Val Montone : March 26, 1841. 
 
 I have made what I suppose were pretty much your tours 
 round about Naples, to Paestum, Amalfi (by sea from 
 Salerno), Sorrento, Capri and Castellamare. I am sorry to 
 say I always fail to appreciate properly what I have heard 
 much puffed beforehand ; consequently Pompeii disappointed 
 me a little even at Amalfi I must confess I was rather dis- 
 appointed because it did not surpass my expectations. The 
 coast between Salerno and Amalfi, and Paestum did. There 
 is certainly something very pleasant in the way in which these 
 places carry one back either to Horace and Juvenal (Virgil I 
 have not with me), or to the time when I read them, I can't 
 quite tell which. And lines which one sees now to be graphic 
 haunt one in a pleasant way. I have been pursued for the 
 last day or two by ' Liris quieta mordet aqua, &c.,' and 
 ' Principis angusta Caprearum in rupe sedentis,' since I have 
 crossed the Liris and seen Tiberius's Palace at Capri, a regular 
 specimen of a magnificent vulture's nest. 
 
 I hear of a bishop in these parts (Neapolitan), of Avellino 
 I think, who is what my cabman calls with much reprobation 
 ' inquieto assai assai,' i.e. endeavouring vigorously to reform 
 the clergy, and others too. The clergy, for misconduct, are 
 without ceremony imprisoned in the Bishop's palace. Do 
 you know exactly on what theory the distinction between 
 offences of ecclesiastical and of civil cognisance are kept up 
 here in the Papal States, the punishment being the same ? 
 A man, as I understand, may be imprisoned for blasphemy, 
 incontinence, or theft : but for the last by the police for the 
 two former by the Bishop. Is the Roman view of civil
 
 1841 WINTER AT ROME 95 
 
 authority the utilitarian or the paternal ? I think I mentioned 
 that one of the Cardinals (Giustiniani, who is said to have 
 been nearly elected Pope but vetoed by Austria) is also said 
 to have used his episcopal authority of imprisonment at his 
 diocese, Imola, to such purpose that it was thought expedient 
 to transfer him to another diocese out of the ferment which 
 he had raised in his own. 
 
 Rome, April 8. A day or two since I saw a remarkable 
 thing at one of the retraites, which I spoke of before for the 
 lower classes, and which a priest named Pentini was to take 
 us to. We went to hear him (in fact) preach to sixty or 
 seventy soldiers who were in the ritiro, partly by compulsion, 
 partly by their own will. We were present at one of a course 
 of sermons which were to last the eight days of their being 
 there. It happened to be the one on the Blessed Virgin. 
 We were in the chapel and they in the next room with the 
 door almost shut, so I could not hear distinctly, but I should 
 not have thought it powerful except that Pentini himself is 
 an earnest, simple-hearted man and very energetic in manner. 
 However, near the end of the sermon we were sent out of that 
 part of the chapel, and shortly Pentini rushed in with all the 
 soldiers in a body after him, who all threw themselves sobbing 
 and groaning before a picture of the Virgin over the Altar, he 
 standing at their head and leading the way in vehement 
 ejaculations to her, mixed with a kind of shouting encourage- 
 ment to pray on, and pray earnestly much in the way, 
 mutatis mutandis, in which you would cheer on men who 
 were fighting : all the men going on sobbing loudly and 
 apparently quite overcome as ' Pray to her, pray earnestly, cry 
 to her you know not how she loves you cry " Viva Maria ! " 
 and then there was a kind of low shout of ' Viva Maria ! ' 
 (which with ' Viva Gesu ! ' seems common both as an utterance 
 and as an inscription on the walls. I did not know it, though 
 I suppose you do, from such books as ' St. Francois de Sales '). 
 This continued for some time and ended with a short litany 
 or some other office. He had told us that he considered this 
 sermon was the most effectual of any to bend those who came 
 into the place set against the discipline they were to undergo. 
 The people, I hear, consider that great temporal curses are 
 likely to fall on those who attend these exercises without
 
 96 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. in 
 
 being bettered by them. And accordingly there is much 
 dread of going. Pentini himself certainly seemed to consider 
 that manifest judgments had fallen on those who had relapsed, 
 after repentance there. A day or two before, I had heard two 
 of the Jesuits' ' esercizi nobili,' which certainly did not strike 
 me at all. . . . 
 
 We hear terrible rumours here about what is going on at 
 Oxford 2 Stanley with active curiosity, Smith of Trinity 
 with distress, Hope with a manly anxiety, and I with a stomach- 
 ache. Our principal authority is the ' Standard ' with com- 
 ments by the ' Sun.' Waterton, the mad ornithologist, calls 
 you all ' the party that won't speak out,' i.e. Roman Catholics 
 that won't own it. He has got hold of the ' Ecclesiastical 
 Almanac,' now the ' Puseyite Almanac,' as he calls it (I sup- 
 pose from his Jesuit friends who are ' taking notes '), and of 
 course considers us all on the turn. 
 
 I have not seen very much of the ceremonies of last week, 
 scarcely more than the fireworks, and the misereres of the 
 Sistine Chapel, which certainly are very wonderful (they 
 struck me like a wild singing of birds), though I do not under- 
 stand the excessive impressiveness that they are said to have. 
 The only things that the ' public ' seem to have been im- 
 pressed with this year were the benediction, and the Pope's 
 manner of waiting on the pilgrims. I hear the Pope much 
 better spoken of than I expected, and I have heard the cur- 
 rent scandals denied in a frank unreserved way that looked 
 true. The highest classes here are said to be far better 
 behaved in point of morality than in any other great city of 
 Italy. On my way here I saw one or two show convents 
 (Trisalti, Carthusian, and Monte Casino, Benedictine), but 
 much in the way a stranger sees Christ Church. At the 
 strangers' table of the former I met a curious specimen of 
 human nature, or rather of the Neapolitan country clergy, 
 who amused me not a little, but will keep, as I am afraid 
 you would row me for malice if I filled a letter with him. I 
 shall be somewhat anxious for what I find at Florence from 
 Oxford. Kindest remembrances to all. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 F. ROGERS. 
 
 2 Tract 90 (on the Articles) was published in February, 1841.
 
 is-ii WINTER AT ROME 97 
 
 To Mrs. Rogers. 
 
 Venice : May 9, 1841. 
 
 This place is delightful, and the Piazza di S. Marco, with 
 the church (a kind of Eastern, Byzantine, half mosque-looking 
 cathedral) and Doge's palace &c., beyond anything I could I 
 have conceived. I find myself there about twice a day, and I 
 don't remember having enjoyed anything more than Friday 
 evening, when a band began to play about sunset ; all the 
 cafes, which almost surround the piazza, put out chairs, and 
 all Venice came to walk about and enjoy themselves shops 
 gaily lighted up, and a beautiful starlight night. The deli- 
 cious part of it is that all that you see there is magnificent 
 and just as it was when the old Doges married the sea, and 
 just exactly what it ougJit to have been a magnificent mixture 
 of the merchant and the noble, nothing at all of the feudal 
 about it, nothing for defence, or putting you in mind of bands 
 of retainers, nothing rough or unfinished, but a look of rich, 
 well-managed security about the architecture, fine taste, no 
 expense spared in detail, and no eyesores allowed, except 
 perhaps one or two things, such as the standard holes, which 
 had historical associations. Then the smaller canals are 
 picturesque beyond belief, with a rich breadth of light and 
 shade, and beauty of colour (even during the sirocco which is 
 now blowing) quite wonderful to English eyes. And the luxury 
 of sliding about in your most comfortable gondola instead of 
 a dusty, muddy cab is no small addition to the enjoyment. 
 
 I have made this evening at dinner what I hope will be a 
 nice acquaintance a M. Thevenot, a French Carlist, who has 
 been to Trieste, to visit the ex-Royal Family of France, and 
 tells me that the ' Queen is coming to the Hotel in a fe\v 
 days, incog., to visit a friend.' Having told me this on a few 
 minutes' acquaintance, he makes such a mystery of it that I 
 almost suspect him of being an impostor, else I should say 
 he was a remarkably pleasing, intelligent, manly kind of fellow 
 and, curiously enough, he is in fact an old acquaintance, we 
 having travelled together from Naples to Monte Casino about 
 six weeks since, when he was much offended with a friend, a 
 
 H
 
 98 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. in 
 
 fellow traveller, for admiring the country we passed through. 
 * Bah ! tu es malade.' ' Tu ne vois pas clair ce matin.' But 
 I hear him coming to the door to take me out in his gondola. 
 
 May 10. My friend M. Thevenot is certainly a nice fellow. 
 After the strict secrecy that he enjoined me about ' the Queen/ 
 I find her incognito only extends to travelling under the 
 title of Duchess of Angouleme, my to-day's gondoliers having 
 told me that the said Duchess and her nephew were to come the 
 day after to-morrow. M. T. gives a most enthusiastic account 
 of their virtues. She never speaks a harsh word of those who 
 have injured her, and the young Henri V. has much esprit, is 
 handsome, amiable, and rides like an angel on horseback. I 
 have struck up here and on the road an alliance with a 
 family hight Ruskin, the father a good, honest north- 
 countryman, and at the same time, London merchant ; the 
 son an Oxford prizeman, 3 who draws beautifully. Also I 
 have just met the Hohenthals, to whom I shall go this even- 
 ing, so that I find myself somewhat at home here. There 
 is something very amusing and agreeable in the way you meet 
 over and over again some of your travelling acquaintances. 
 
 I have just been over the inside of the Doge's palace, 
 Bridge of Sighs, &c. It is a terrible place, and more especially 
 in the change from the size and magnificence of the state 
 rooms to the prisons beneath, which are duly to be seen 
 horrible places (though, they say, healthy), with almost more 
 -wall than space in them ; some with a gleam of daylight 
 (those for more ordinary criminals), the next story for those 
 who were taken cognisance of by the ' inquisizione ' (as I 
 understood), not Inquisition, with lamplight coming to them 
 only through a round hole barred ; and then below the level 
 of the canal those of the state criminals and some others which 
 they called ' casi reservati,' reserved, i.e., for the Council of 
 Ten, with no light at all. Certainly, on the whole, taking into 
 account the position on the Canal, a narrowish and therefore 
 dark thoroughfare, and under all these magnificent counci 
 halls with nothing in them but rich paintings of glories and 
 victories and Doges and their virtues, and then the dreadful. 
 
 3 Mr. Ruskin \vas then an under- and the first volume of Modern Painters 
 graduate. He took his degree in 1842. was published the year after.
 
 1841 WINTER AT ROME 99 
 
 quiet Venetian way of settling people's fate, they are as im- 
 pressive places as I have seen. Ordinary criminals after 
 condemnation were simply executed (in front of the palace, 
 I think) in the sight of the people ; but the ' casi reservati ' 
 were made away with in those prisons, ' on the stone which 
 you are standing on,' as I was told by the man who was 
 lighting me through the narrow passages, when I asked him 
 where the quiet executions took place. 
 
 May 12. I have been rather more diligent in lionising here 
 than in most places, though my good friend M. Thevenot 
 spoilt a morning the day before yesterday. The pictures are 
 very magnificent, not with the same touchirigness that one 
 finds about Perugia, &c., but rich golden flesh and drapery 
 and bold light and shade. In that line I am much in love 
 with Tintoret, a painter one never sees in England, but who 
 seems to "have painted in Venice almost as much as Rubens 
 in Belgium. What perhaps pleases me most just at present 
 is his originality ; it is something so very refreshing after having 
 gone through crowds of pictures, one just a little differing 
 from the others of their school, to come slap on a man who 
 has quite imagined a style for himself and thrown it off at 
 once quite complete. For K.'s benefit, I will say that his style 
 is generally strong effect of light and shade, with very bold con- 
 trasts and hardly any half tint except on the masses of light ; 
 effect, however, not being of sharp contrast but of full richness- 
 His shades are not veined with half lights like Rembrandt's, 
 but dark masses, which, if he wishes to break, he breaks by a 
 light as bright as any other in the drawing, only not so large 
 (as e.g. in a glory round the head of a saint). And his great 
 picture (the miracle of St. Mark, a slave whom a crowd are 
 trying to kill with hatchets and stakes, which all break upon 
 him) is in colour just what his ordinary pictures are in chiaro- 
 scuro. However, it is absurd writing to you about a painter 
 that you don't know, only the more I think of that picture the 
 more I am astonished at it. I can't conceive what could have 
 put it into his head. I should say there was no mannerism 
 in it and yet that it was totally unlike any other style of 
 painting I ever saw ; and the vigour of the drawing is quite 
 up to the colouring.
 
 ioo LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. in 
 
 I went to-day over the Arsenal, which has some interesting 
 things in it ; standards taken at Lepanto, which I liked because 
 when one reads of bashaws, their tails, and Turkish standards 
 flying in old history, it is satisfactory to have seen them and 
 know exactly what they were like. Also some instruments 
 of torture, the collar (as I understood) with which Carrara 4 
 was strangled ; thumbscrews and other nice inventions for 
 people who would not confess, taken from the Doge's palace, 
 of which I have told you, a beautiful little model of the 
 Bucentaur, and the actual chair of the Doge from it. All 
 which things I don't consider as mere relics (for which I still 
 profess not to care) but good solid realities which make you 
 conceive history twice as well as you would without them. I 
 regret every moment I do not know Italian history, particularly 
 Venetian. Here I have, within sight of my window, palaces 
 of Foscari, Barbarigi, Pisani, Grimani, and I "may say 
 Giustiniani, with nothing but a vague notion that people of 
 these names existed in Venice, and did great things, without 
 knowing what, except from Lord Byron. And by the way 
 that gentleman does seem to enjoy the most extraordinary 
 popularity here and everywhere in Italy. He is the first 
 author every Italian priest or layman talks to you of. An 
 Armenian to whom I brought a letter, and who showed me 
 his convent, obviously thought it the great fact of his life to 
 have taught Lord Byron. The Vitalis at Milan, a student I 
 picked up at Padua, and the gondoliers here, all set to work 
 talking of him immediately. N.B. I have seen in the shops 
 here ' Oliviero Tuuist,' ' scritto da Boz (Carolo Dickens), 
 e volgarizzato (!) da A. B.' The notion of Oliver being put 
 into the vulgar tongue, that vulgar tongue being Italian, seems 
 to me rich. I should like to know Mr. A. B. 
 
 By the bye, don't be surprised at an artist of the name of 
 Lear dropping in upon you some day to see if I have come 
 back. But ask to see his drawings, which are beautiful. He 
 is a friend of the Hornbys, and I told him I hoped we should 
 see him some day on his way to them, and that, even though 
 1 am not at home, I hoped he would go in and make your 
 
 1 Francesco II. da Carrara, sur- taken prisoner by the Venetians and 
 named ' Novello,' of Padua. He \\as put to death in 1406.
 
 1841 WINTER AT ROME 101 
 
 acquaintance, telling him at the same time if he had his port- 
 folio with him that some of you would really and truly enjoy 
 looking at them. He was to have been my companion in the 
 mountains about Subiaco &c., and the sketches (black and 
 white chalk) are principally about Rome. 
 
 To Rev. J. H. Newman. 
 
 Innspruck : May 19, 1841. 
 
 I can't say what a satisfaction it was to me to receive 
 Church's letter and your P.S. at Florence. 5 The whole affair 
 has been to me like the bursting of a cloud that had been 
 making me very uncomfortable, and it is quite a relief to fancy 
 that it has gone off with so little damage. I suppose you 
 feel yourself that the stopping of the Tracts is a thing of very 
 little importance now, and, as you imply, things are on a 
 truer footing. . . . 
 
 I hear from a French Carlist that the French Government 
 is obliged to keep down religious education by a tax, i.e. that 
 there are two systems at work, the Government one of ecoles 
 d? enseignement mutuel (of course purely secular) ; and that of 
 the ' freres ignorantins.' Under the Restoration the Govern- 
 ment patronised the latter, who accordingly got somewhat 
 idle ; but since the Government of 1830 has discountenanced 
 them they have become much more zealous, and there has 
 been the great religious reaction, and all this, with the natural 
 tendency of the French to oppose the Government, has 
 made the ' freres ignorantins ' so much preferred by the people 
 that the schools of enseignement mutuel would fall if they 
 were not supported b'y a tax, paid by every teacher on 
 every pupil whom he takes, which (I think) goes to support 
 them. He viewed the enseignement mutuel people as useful 
 in their way, partly as a spur to the others, and partly as 
 really ' authors of improvements,' but said they were in fact 
 theorists, and the others were those who were used to have 
 
 5 This letter from Mr. Church, dated Oxford), is published with Mr. New- 
 March 14, 1841 (giving a full account man's postscript in theZz) and Letters 
 of the feeling and the proceedings at of Dean Church, pp. 27-34.
 
 102 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. in 
 
 the reins in their hands, and knew how to manage children, 
 and whom the people were used to. 
 
 The Tyrolese are really an uncommonly nice people. 
 Anderdon told me that before you had been a day in the 
 Tyrol you felt as if they were all your brothers even without 
 speaking the language and really it is very true, and I do 
 think it is not founded on fancy, but on themselves. There 
 seems to be a mixture of obligingness and independence 
 which is quite refreshing after the south of Italy, where one 
 could not speak six civil words to a man without being asked 
 for qualctt cosa. This place is, I think, the most beautiful I 
 have yet seen, far beyond Florence, and to my mind without 
 the enervating look that the beautiful Italian cities have. 
 
 At Verona I found as usual the Capuchins and Jesuits 
 more thought of than the other clergy ; my cicerone liked the 
 seculars because they were liberi, disliked the regulars 
 because they were fanatici, excepted in favour of the Capu- 
 chins because they were truly pii : explained that to mean 
 that they did great penances and got up in the middle of the 
 night to do them ; they were notfanaticz, because when people 
 confessed to them they considered that true contrition was 
 enough, and set very slight penances. The Jesuits, on the 
 contrary, were fanatici inasmuch as they were not to be 
 trifled with, and would not give absolution without good 
 hearty penance. I was rather amused at the difference of 
 Italian and English notions of fanaticism. 
 
 There is here (and elsewhere) a remarkable order called 
 ' Redemptorists' : their office is, when called on by a clergyman, 
 to send some five of their body to preach and receive con- 
 fessions in his parish for twelve days in short, to head a kind 
 of ' revival.' A good, simple-hearted friend of Hope's here 
 tells me they produce very great effects, ' converting' whole 
 parishes of mauvais sujets, and he said it did not cause any 
 itching ears or discontent with their cure, as, firstly, they were 
 not ' popular preachers,' but simply zealous, honest men ; and, 
 secondly (what seemed to me remarkable), that they often 
 removed a cause of want of confidence between cure and 
 people, for that they frequently found (so they told him) 
 persons who, from fear of confessing to a person who knew
 
 is-ii WINTER AT ROME 103 
 
 them and was daily seeing them, had gone on, up to the time 
 when the Redemptorists came, making false confessions, and 
 confessed truly to these, whom they were never to see again. 
 And he said that after this one good confession such persons 
 did in fact put themselves under the cure's guidance in a way 
 in which they (of course) never had done it before. They go 
 principally to country parishes and were nearly coming to 
 Wales, but had no one who understood Welsh, and so the 
 opportunity passed. I was taken by my friend to see one to- 
 day, but I cannot say much transpired, seeing the Redemp- 
 torist understood no languages but German and Latin talk- 
 ing the latter not very well and we were keeping him from 
 his dinner. 
 
 I saw an account of ' No. 90 ' in an Innspruck religious 
 newspaper (or periodical) translated from the Untvers, and 
 wished I knew German enough to read it. The delight with 
 which my little friend here looks forward to the time when 
 England with all her power of spreading Christianity will 
 return to the Roman Catholic Church is so sanguine that it 
 rather perplexes me. 
 
 I met Dr. Weedall (I think his name is), late head of 
 Oscott College, again and again, and he has told me certainly 
 a strange history. I ought to say that he is a person whose 
 conversation is moderate and quiet and sensible, and so on, 
 but with a strong dash of softness or else he thought me 
 very soft as, e.g., he talked with great satisfaction, and 
 wished to impress me by talking of an academia or kind of 
 conversazione held at Cardinal Orioli's on Good Friday evening, 
 when the Cardinal read a paper on Latin prose, and others 
 copies of hexameters, &c., and a celebrated improvisatrice 
 named Rosa Taddei improvised on subjects connected with 
 our Saviour's Passion. However, his history is that he 
 stopped in the Tyrol to see two young women who are much 
 talked of among Roman Catholics. They are said both to 
 have shown a very remarkable piety from their childhood, 
 and both early in life were attacked by very painful diseases 
 which have never left them, and both have devoted themselves 
 to a life of contemplation. In one this has passed into a 
 continued ecstasy, except when commanded by her confessor
 
 io 4 LETTERS OF LORI) BLACHFORD CH. in 
 
 (without whose direction she never makes a movement) ; she 
 is continually on her knees in a position which Dr. W. de- 
 scribes as most beautiful and impressive, and one in which the 
 mere natural force of the human body could scarce sustain 
 her. When bidden by him, she lies down and gets up 
 which Dr. W. saw and in a way which he says he cannot 
 describe, but which seems to be without any of the effort which 
 even a person in health would find it necessary to use (e.g. 
 without unclosing her hands), and when bidden by him she 
 eats a few grapes or a pear or some such slight thing. She 
 never speaks to any one, but people are taken in to see her, 
 and she seems to take a pleasure in seeirig them. The other 
 case is of the same kind, but that the ecstasy is not continual, 
 
 | and / think she speaks to strangers. She has not eaten or 
 drunk anything at all for seven years, as her confessor testifies 
 
 * to Dr. W. Both have received the stigmata (which Dr. W. 
 
 saw), and the latter also the impression of the crown of thorns, 
 
 all of which cause them the greatest agony, and in the latter 
 
 case gush out with blood (on Friday when they go over in 
 
 their meditations the Passion of our Lord, and especially at 
 
 three o'clock). The places where these two persons have 
 
 appeared were places (like all the Tyrol, as I understood) 
 
 where there was a great deal of piety, and their history has 
 
 acted as a stimulus. How does all this strike you ? I must 
 
 confess to a strong prejudice against it. On the other hand 
 
 I happened to go into a Tyrolese church the other morning 
 
 r (a feast day) while Mass was going on, and I must allow it is 
 
 , a thing to make one sad to see what may be, and is not, in the 
 
 ( Anglican Church. 
 
 Dollinger and Wendischmann are being very civil, and 
 Dollinger is one of the most taking people I have seen since I 
 have been abroad. 
 
 All sorts of remembrances to all people, Church, Mozley 
 Marriott, Johnson, Ward, &c. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS
 
 1841 WINTER AT ROME 105 
 
 To Miss S. Rogers. 
 
 Oriel : June 27, 1841. 
 
 I find as I thought that that passage in Newman's letter 
 to the Bishop of Oxford 6 which seems to throw the responsi- 
 bility of the Tracts on the Bishop ivas put in to please him ; 
 and that the whole letter was sent to him before it was pub- 
 lished, and just sent back with a verbal notice of his ' unquali- 
 fied approbation,' and then followed by a very kind and satis- 
 factory note. The Bishop wished it to appear that he had 
 always kept Jiis eye on the Tracts, which in fact was tantamount 
 (whether he meant it or not) to taking part of the responsi- 
 bility, as far as permission went. 
 
 I suspect matters here will end in Church's tutorship being 
 taken away. It is an uncommon nuisance for the Provost, as 
 he loses two tutors by marriage (Daman and Prichard) this 
 vacation, and so if Church goes he will be left with none but 
 
 - who is a blister to him. But it seems he cannot well 
 help himself. Church was honest enough to volunteer telling 
 him that he agreed with No. 90. The Provost said first he 
 was a young man and did not know his own mind, which 
 would have left things in a very uncomfortable position for 
 Church as leaving it in the Provost's power to keep him (on 
 trial) just as long as was convenient, and then pack him off on 
 plea of being incorrigible, but since that he has had a talk, in 
 which he proposed Church's keeping the tutorship but not 
 lecturing on the Articles. This Church declined on the ground 
 of the statute quoted by the Heads of Houses, which makes 
 it the duty of tutors to teacJi the Articles. Then the Provost 
 proposed laying it before the Vice-Chancellor : this Church 
 also declined ; it being perfectly clear how the Vice-Chan- 
 cellor would give it (against Church) and the Provost being 
 perfectly competent to act by himself. So that the only 
 effect would have been forcing from a University authority a 
 strong judgment against No. 90. Now it is the Provost's 
 move, and I suspect he is bound by some agreement among 
 the Heads themselves not to keep a tutor under those circum- 
 stances (at least such an agreement has been asserted in print 
 
 e Bishop Bagot.
 
 106 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. HI 
 
 to exist, professedly on the authority of a Head), so that I 
 suppose Church must budge. Probably it will end in Church 
 keeping it for a short limited time, as a favour, till some tutors 
 can be found to fill the places, if the Provost can submit to be 
 under an obligation to the men he is turning out. He 
 lately asked a good meek kind of man named B. (cousin of 
 Pusey's) whether he agreed with 90, informing him that if he 
 did he could not sign his college testimonials for priest's 
 orders. B. in a great fright replied that he had no occa- 
 sion for them, having already got them a year ago. ' But you 
 will want them for that year.' No, he had been out of resi- 
 dence, and had accordingly got them from three neigh- 
 bouring beneficed clergymen. So departed B. thinking the 
 Provost had floored him excessively. The rest of the world, 
 however, thought he had floored the Provost. 
 
 The Provost is obviously quite alive to the excessive in 
 convenience of parting with Church at the present moment, 
 which is amusing, especially if he is at the bottom at all of the 
 agreement to expel tutors. I don't know which will be the 
 martyr, he or Church. 
 
 To Rev. J. H. Newman. 
 
 Eliot Place : July 22, 1841. 
 
 As to the ' British Critic,' I confess myself out of heart. A 
 line which shall satisfy Oakeley, Ward, Keble, and Wilson 
 permanently seems hard to find, independently of the 
 particular difficulties about Mozley. I am afraid your notion 
 of my getting ' general influence ' in the review is rather 
 hopeless. I feel far too perplexed and mistrustful myself to 
 have any chance of keeping together half-a-dozen different 
 sets of writers all pulling ways which I don't understand. . . . 
 
 To Miss S. Rogers. 
 
 Oriel : Nov. 21, 1841. 
 
 My dear Sophy, Your card has just arrived, and looks 
 all that is beautiful. Pusey has been writing a most out- 
 rageously injudicious letter (which any one of his friends would 
 have stopped if he had shown it them) in hopes of benefiting
 
 1841 WINTER AT ROME 107 
 
 Williams 7 by a plain statement of the case, and stating as 
 matters of course and commonly known, first, that before 
 party differences arose Williams was looked to by residents 
 as the obvious man for the professorship, and secondly, that 
 Garbett would not have been brought forward now to oppose 
 him but for such theological differences. Now, both these 
 things are in spirit quite true. The majority of residents will 
 vote for Williams in spite of the strong cry against him, and 
 he was publicly, and alone, talked of as the probable professor, 
 principally of course among people of our own sort, but, I 
 should think, in a way that must have come to the ears of 
 most men, though certain sets do live so completely apart 
 from others that, no doubt, they would not have heard it (I 
 mean Heads of Houses, and hunting, noisy men, of whom there 
 are still a residue here). As to the other assertion, it is clear 
 that a set is generally being made against us (tutors turned 
 out, &c.). The opposition to Williams is put on a theo- 
 logical ground by his opponents publicly, and as far as I hear 
 almost universally, and the other candidate, Garbett, let 
 Williams know that if he (Williams) withdrew in favour of a 
 third person (C laugh ton) Garbett would not stand. This is 
 explained in another way, viz. that against Claughton Garbett 
 thought he should have no chance, whereas he would against 
 Williams, but it certainly has a personal cut about it. 
 
 But on the other hand the head of Garbett's college, 8 it 
 seems, had never heard of Williams as a candidate when he 
 proposed to the college bringing forward Garbett, so he put 
 forward a paper flooring Pusey with this fact, which you 
 observe does floor (apparently) both Pusey's assertions, and 
 talking about its being begun in 'generous rivalry ' and then 
 ' not being responsible for its having become theological.' 
 
 7 In 1841, on the election to the unwisely emphasised the point (which 
 
 Professorship of Poetry, vacated by Mr. was not, however, avowed by the other 
 
 Keble, there was a contest between side) that the fight was a theological 
 
 Mr. Isaac Williams and Mr. (afterwards one. The contest waged by pamphlets 
 
 Archdeacon) Garbett of Brasenose. and letters, both at Oxford and in Lon- 
 
 The opposition to Mr. Williams was, don, ended in 1842, when it was found 
 
 unfortunately, beyond a doubt due to that Mr. Garbett had most promises 
 
 the fact that he belonged to the Trac- of votes, and Mr. Williams with- 
 
 tarian party and was a friend of New- drew, 
 
 man and Keble. Dr. Pusey's letter s Dr. Gilbert.
 
 io8 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. in 
 
 However, people were very angry with Pusey's letter at first, 
 as dictation, and because it was Pusey, and this affair ot 
 Gilbert's has at present much heightened the bad effect. 
 
 To the same. 
 
 Oriel : December 12, 1841. 
 
 As to matters here I am afraid Fusey has knocked Wil- 
 liams's chance on the head ; I think he -really would have got 
 in if it had not been for that letter. And now, could you 
 suppose it possible Pusey can hardly be persuaded not to 
 write a third letter, which he wishes to direct at the universal 
 recipient Jelf ? I had to be called in and advise about the 
 second, and never in the whole course of my practice did I 
 undergo such a two days as were spent in the consideration 
 of what should be said, a whole host of perfectly different 
 opinions to be taken, Pusey himself dissatisfied with every- 
 thing that was not grossly injudicious, and all of us in the 
 most exceeding agony as to what would come, Pusey pro- 
 ducing specimen after specimen each more dangerous than 
 the last. And Gilbert's humbugging letter in possession of 
 the field all the time, and getting additional credit every 
 moment that it remained unanswered. However, I hope the 
 answer has done pretty fairly, i.e. it has done no harm, which 
 was all that could be expected. 
 
 I have had a short troublesome correspondence with 
 Gladstone and Badeley, who wanted a compromise, they 
 thinking that there was on the tapis a proposal to that effect 
 from the other party. The people on the other side talk 
 very big, and I suppose they really will beat us by some con- 
 siderable majority ; but our numbers, if anything like all our 
 promises come up, will be such as would secure an enormous 
 majority in any ordinary case. The only thing that could 
 save us would be some happy event which would make all 
 the impartial people who want it not to be a theological con- 
 test rush up and vote on the merits of the question. But how 
 they are to be worked up to such an act I don't see. 
 
 The moderate man was not myself but Palmer of Magdalen, 
 whom you probably know of, who has accordingly, to show
 
 1841 WINTER AT ROME 
 
 109 
 
 that he is not moderate, issued a letter to Golightly princi- 
 pally intended to ' anathematise ' (his word) all Protestants 
 and Protestantism and favourers thereof, archbishops, bishops, 
 priests, deacons, and laymen, in a style which I should think 
 might not be without a certain effect on the unlucky Williams's 
 election. I really don't know why it is that everybody should 
 seize this especial opportunity of going mad. 
 
 The Bishop of Winchester has again refused to ordain 
 
 - [one of Mr. Keble's curates]. Keble, of course, is very 
 much distressed at it. I don't know what he will do. ~" Pro- 
 fessor Airey has been here for a day or so, and breakfasted 
 with me this morning, with Johnson. What a queer fellow 
 he is ! He was amusing at breakfast ; only he is plainly a 
 lazy hand at getting up, and so was about three quarters of 
 an hour after time, which does not always do in college. 
 
 I got up an unsuccessful attempt at Palestrina the other 
 day ; and pretty much gave up the notion of continuing it. 
 One little thing, a kind of chant, very easy, I should like to 
 try when we get home, in the reality it is most beautiful, and 
 even played on the piano very fine. 
 
 I have not been seeing very much of anybody except 
 Church, Mozley, and perhaps Donkin. The fact is, people are 
 beginning to feel anxious about things, and I am glad they 
 should, for it is not before they ought. 
 
 I think Sibthorp's conversion did good here in the way 
 of frightening your young gentlemen who had been overready 
 with their tongues. What do you think of 'Jack ' Morris 
 taking the sober line? Ward, Oakeley, and "others goon 
 pushing ahead, but many men are pulling up, Mozley," Ryder, 
 Bloxam, I should say Pusey and Williams : of Keble I can't 
 tell. I should think it almost impossible to say what strange 
 changes of position may have taken place before three years 
 are out. 
 
 On the whole matters look to me dreary enough, though 
 one cannot but trust that things will be made to turn out 
 right, if only people try to do right. If it were not for some 
 indistinct feeling of that kind I should feel very blue. 
 
 Yours affectionately, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS.
 
 no LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. in 
 
 To Rev. J. H. Newman. 
 
 12 Paper Buildings, 1 emple : January 4, 1842. 
 
 My dear Newman, I hardly like troubling you about 
 Williams's election, but I think somebody in Oxford should 
 know the state of the case. A proposal to withdraw both 
 candidates and letter of the Committee here will come down 
 to the President of Trinity by this post. You will see the 
 kind of thing it is. A letter, however, which I received from 
 Gladstone this morning made me call on him, and I found 
 him obviously set on getting the matter finished quoquo modo : 
 if not by the withdrawal of both, by the withdrawal of one ; 
 and urging the signatures of five out of seven bishops 
 (members of Convocation) the known sentiments of all, &c. 
 as motives, in conscience for the withdrawal of one even if 
 the other refused. He seems to have got them (especially 
 the Bishop of Oxford) to sign, by the notion (on their parts) 
 that their authority would put an end to the contest, 
 Llandaff and Chichester (alone) refusing, because they wished 
 a stigma thrown upon Williams. He insisted much on the 
 Bishop's real wish that Williams would withdraw, and, as far 
 as I understood, wished to establish that the presumption of 
 the wish, arising from the mere fact of their signatures, was 
 sufficient to bind us either to act on it or to take measures 
 to draw out a more distinct statement, especially from the 
 Bishop of Oxford. He seemed to think the Bishop of Oxford 
 would be ready to give this. 
 
 I say all this because else it appears to me you might 
 fancy things going differently from what they really are. 
 
 Yours affectionately, 
 FREDERIC ROGERS. 
 
 To Rev. J. H. Newman. 
 
 Temple : April 3, 1843. 
 
 My dear Newman, I do not like to meet you again with- 
 out having said, once for all, what I hope you will not think 
 hollow or false. I cannot disguise from myself how very
 
 1843 WINTER AT ROME in 
 
 improbable perhaps impossible a recurrence to our former 
 terms is. But I wish, before the time has past for such an 
 acknowledgment, to have said how deeply and painfully I feel 
 and I may say have more or less felt for years the great- 
 ness of what I am losing, and to thank you for all you have 
 done and been to me. I know that it is in a great measure 
 by my own act that I am losing this, and I cannot persuade 
 myself that I am substantially wrong, or that I could long 
 have avoided what has happened. But I do believe, if I may 
 dare to say so, that God would have found a way to preserve 
 to me so great a blessing as your friendship if I had been less 
 unworthy of it. I do feel most earnestly how much of any- 
 thing which I may venture to be thankful for in what I am is 
 of your forming how more than kind how tender you have 
 always been to me, and how unlikely it is that I can ever \ 
 again meet with anything approaching in value to the I 
 intimacy which you gave me. ... I should have been pained 
 at leaving all this unsaid. But I do not write it with any 
 idea of forcing an answer from you nor does it require one 
 and I shall not attach any meaning to your leaving it un- 
 answered. 
 
 Yours affectionately, 
 FREDERIC ROGERS.
 
 ii2 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. iv 
 
 CHAPTER IV 
 
 In London, reading law and writing for the ' Times,' 
 and early official life (1842-1850) 
 
 IN the summer of 1 842 Mr. Rogers began his work in London, 
 reading law in the Temple, where he shared chambers with 
 Mr. S. Wood, a brother of the late Lord Halifax. All his 
 evenings, except on Sunday, seem to have been taken up by 
 the task of writing leaders for the ' Times.' He has left an 
 account of this work.-which gives an interesting picture of the 
 journalism of that day : ' I dined with Mr. Walter and his son 
 in Printing House Square at five o'clock, and found that I was 
 expected to write an article then and there on one of the subjects 
 of the day. I protested my inability,' not supposing myself 
 capable of doing such a thing in less than a week. This was 
 pooh-poohed. I tried, found it possible, and found also that 
 I was expected to repeat the process next day ; same hour, 
 same dinner, short conversation after dinner, then the subject 
 was announced and I was left alone till tea-time, when Mr. 
 Walter appeared, read aloud what I had done, with criticisms, 
 and after correction carried off the copy to the printer. 
 When the article was finished the same process was repeated, 
 and when I was disburdened of the whole article I went home 
 to bed. Gradually it appeared that I was expected to do 
 this (exceptis excipiendis) every evening. And being, though 
 an Oxford Don, not skilful in saying No, or in evading saying 
 Yes, while Walter was an adept in the art of making you 
 believe that you had pledged yourself to do what he wanted 
 you to do, I found myself soon engaged to write a daily
 
 1842 WORK IN LONDON 113 
 
 article, usually in the manner aforesaid, with a very liberal 
 salary. I neither wanted nor expected one or the other ; 
 but there I was engaged, with a month's vacation and occa- 
 sional holidays, pledged to write six articles a week, and to 
 eat five dinners in Printing House Square. Several rules or 
 objects I laid down for myself: (i) not to write on Sunday, 
 except in case of real urgency ; (2) to strike a blow when I 
 could in favour of the "good cause ;" (3) to substitute, as far 
 as I could, satire for " thunder." The dinners I found such a 
 tie that after the first year I gave them up. A new arrange- 
 ment was made, and ultimately it was understood that I 
 should send articles when required (i.e. about every day). 
 
 ' It was a harassing work, partly from its continuous 
 pressure, partly from a constant apprehension that my in- 
 dependence was being undermined. At the same time it was 
 very interesting and amusing. In the first place you were 
 not unfrequently crossing swords with notabilities by whom 
 it was some credit even to have been attacked. Once I got 
 
 o 
 
 such a notice from Sir Robert Peel. It was on occasion of 
 his bill relating to banks of issue. I had read Jones Lloyd's 
 and Hubbard's pamphlets on the subject not to speak of 
 ancient literature, such as Horner's famous report on currency 
 and felt myself capable of putting on the airs of a financial 
 oracle. So I criticised, in an extremely patronising way, his 
 great speech (founded, of course, on a thorough mastery of the 
 subject), and proceeded to air my own newly acquired know- 
 ledge, under cover of supplying gaps in his argument. It 
 was not badly done, and completely deceived Sir Robert, 
 who, not seeing beyond the lion's skin, answered it in a tone 
 of respectful deference with which he would have replied to 
 some great City magnate. 
 
 ' Then the phrase " monster meeting " was due to me. 
 An immense balloon, called (I think) the " Nassau balloon," 
 had been popularly christened the " monster balloon," and I 
 applied the phrase contumeliously to one of O'Connell's 
 
 I
 
 ii 4 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. iv 
 
 immense out-of-door meetings. He accepted it, as the 
 Netherlanders in old times accepted the nickname of 
 Gueux." " The ' Times ' called it a monster meeting, did 
 they ? Well ! monster meetings they should be " and 
 monster meetings they were for the future. 
 
 ' Sometimes (though rarely) I saw or heard that what I 
 considered a valuable thought had been accepted as such as 
 " that political economy busied itself too exclusively with the 
 creation and not enough with the distribution of wealth," a 
 view which must have been novel in 1 844, as Laveleye spoke 
 of it in the seventies as having recently attracted attention. 
 
 ' It was less flattering, but much more amusing, to see 
 how mere commonplace views on this or that subject were 
 taken for granted at dinner parties for the next week or so. 
 It sometimes happened, for instance, that, having to write an 
 article, say, on a debate, I had had much discussion with 
 myself as to the various handles by which it might be laid 
 hold of should I grapple with the actual subject, or criticise 
 the characters of the speakers, or the tactics which underlay 
 the question, or a particular quarrel which gave a liveliness 
 to the debate, or the probable results, &c. ? and, having chosen 
 my handle, I might have had some difficulty in distributing my 
 praise or blame. Not so my readers at least, the average 
 diner-out. They talked my article, as if there was no other 
 point in the debate than that which I had selected, and no 
 conceivable opinion but that which I had, perhaps doubtfully, 
 adopted. 
 
 ' Also I could be virtuous not to the extent of airing 
 any chivalrous or transcendental principle, but in a sober, 
 reasonable, decent, utilitarian way. And be it observed that 
 under cover of this cool reasonableness it is possible to give 
 support now and then to a tolerably high standard of moral 
 judgment. 
 
 ' I really think I did a great deal to put an end to duelling ; 
 never lost an opportunity of making it ridiculous, and was
 
 1843 WORK IN LONDON 115 
 
 favoured by opportunities for doing so. And after I had 
 been at this some time (an early article about one Sir 
 Nathaniel Wraxall was, I think, particularly successful), I 
 was much gratified by some rather dull peer boring the House 
 with a long account of some personal affront, because, he 
 said, duelling had recently been made so ridiculous that a 
 gentleman could no longer take that mode of righting himself. 
 
 ' I was also successful (partly by these very articles) in 
 making Printing House Square understand that there were 
 other modes of affecting public opinion besides " thunder." 
 Mr. Walter showed me one day with much satisfaction what 
 he considered a compliment to my articles, in a letter (since 
 printed) from Crabbe Robinson. The point was, to express 
 his satisfaction at a new kind of article, which, instead of 
 laying down the law, stated the case thoughtfully without 
 dictating, though inviting, a particular judgment. 1 In some 
 cases this might be or, rather, certainly was due to the fact 
 that I did not feel sure (articles being often written on ex parte 
 or possibly imperfect information) that one or the other 
 opinion was right ; and, indeed, it is the habit of my mind to 
 escape from the responsibility of committing myself to a con- 
 clusive opinion till the case is quite clear, or till something 
 has to be done. . . . 
 
 * People do not consider that in reality what they think 
 the dishonesty (i.e. inconsistency) of a paper is often the honesty 
 of contributors, each of whom is allowed to say what he really 
 believes. Of course, in matters of serious principle the pro- 
 prietors or editor ought to have their own views and admit 
 
 1 The passage occurs in Crabbe It has become mild, argumentative, 
 Robinson's Diary, vol. iii. 237 (under and discriminating. I wrote lately to 
 the year 1843) : ' Have you not re- Walter to tell him that I thought the 
 marked how much the style of the paper better than it has been ever 
 "Times" is changed now from what it since I have known it that is, thirty- 
 was ? One no longer sees those fierce six years. He thanked me most warmly 
 declamations which caused Stoddart to for my encouragement and commenda- 
 get the name of " Dr. Slop," and the tion.' 
 paper the title of " The Thunderer."
 
 n6 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. iv 
 
 nothing else in their leading articles. But there are numerous 
 cases in which they cannot have, and are not called upon to 
 have, a settled opinion, and are quite right in leaving the 
 matter to the writer.' 
 
 In 1844 Mr. Rogers began his official life, and gave up 
 writing for the ' Times.' His first appointment was to the 
 post of Registrar of Joint Stock Companies. The origin and 
 nature of his office may be best described in his own words : 
 ' An Act (unparalleled for the looseness of its drafting) had 
 been passed with good reason for the registration and 
 regulation of joint stock companies, and I was appointed to 
 the office created for this purpose. I hardly had time to 
 shake myself and two or three clerks into our building, and 
 to get the necessary books and appliances, before the storm 
 burst upon us. Every existing company had to register its 
 name with us. There had been enormous frauds connected 
 with joint stock companies, and the English law of partner- 
 ship seemed made for obstructing co-operation and enriching 
 lawyers. An Act was very properly passed to remedy these 
 evils by facilitating incorporation, and enforcing (to a ridicu- 
 lous extent) publicity. Every company thereafter formed 
 had to register its name, and every change of name, certain 
 particulars and every change in those particulars, every 
 advertisement it ever issued, and every change in such adver- 
 tisements ; and to register an approved deed of settlement 
 containing certain provisions held by the registrar to fulfil 
 various conditions laid down by Act of Parliament. And all 
 these things were to be registered promptly, so as to be ready 
 for public inspection as soon as the company began to receive 
 money. At this time in 1844 the railway mania was in 
 its utmost fury ; every third-rate attorney seemed to ally 
 himself to a third-rate surveyor, and to register two or three 
 men of straw as " promoters " of some new railway in a 
 country of which they knew nothing, in the hope of obtaining 
 from would-be shareholders sufficient deposits to pay their
 
 1844 WORK IN LONDON 117 
 
 own bills the rest took its chance. Other speculations fol- 
 lowed suit, at a distance, in their extravagance. I remember 
 one man who came to inspect a register (on due payment of 
 a shilling) with the object of selecting some two places between 
 which no railway was yet proposed, in order that he might 
 start one. 
 
 ' I held the registrarship first under Mr. Gladstone and 
 then under Lord Dalhousie ; my real chief, however, being 
 John Shaw Lefevre the most amiable of men, also clear- 
 headed, most industrious, of great literary accomplishments, 
 a man of the world, and a thorough man of business. He 
 was always cordial and friendly, though he could pull me up 
 when I was careless, in a way of his own.' 
 
 Mr. Rogers seems to have succeeded in getting this 
 Registration Office into order, but did not remain in it long, 
 for in the course of the same year he was appointed Assistant 
 Under Secretary to the Colonial Office and Emigration 
 Commissioner. In 1846 emigration had so much increased 
 that it became a matter of great public interest. It was not 
 therefore a loss that his work was restricted to the Emigration 
 Office as Emigration Commissioner with two colleagues, Mr. 
 Murdoch being the chairman. ' We were responsible (i) for 
 checking all the abuses which went on in private passenger 
 ships, particularly such as carried Irish emigrants and fever 
 with them to America ; (2) for conducting in our own ships a 
 large but intermittent emigration to Australia ; (3) for doing 
 the same for the black emigration to the West Indies ; (4) for 
 the examination (to the satisfaction of the Colonial Office) 
 of the innumerable projects of emigration and land-take 
 which were produced by the colonisation mania of the day.' 
 
 In 1845, having already given up his work for the 'Times,' 
 he also resigned his Oriel Fellowship. By the existing Univer- 
 sity regulations he could have retained it, but he always in- 
 tended to give it up as soon as he had any sufficient office or 
 work which promised to be permanent. Curiously enough, his
 
 n8 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. iv 
 
 resignation reached the Provost of Oriel on the very day on 
 which Newman announced his adhesion to Rome and re- 
 signed his Fellowship. From this arose a report at that time 
 at Oxford the very reverse of the truth that Rogers had 
 followed Newman to Rome. 
 
 In 1845, and for some time afterwards, he devoted much 
 of his leisure time to the serious work of starting the 
 ' Guardian,' in conjunction with a few of his most intimate 
 Oxford friends. It was intended to be a Church newspaper 
 of a higher order than the existing ' English Churchman,' and 
 in some degree to carry on the principles of the Oxford move- 
 ment as they were understood before the division in the ranks 
 of those who took part in it. He has left in writing a descrip- 
 tion of the enterprise. ' Newman had joined Rome, and left 
 those who had adhered to him headless, unorganised, suspected 
 by others and suspecting each other ; for nobody yet knew 
 who would follow where he led. For a time a kind of per- 
 plexed hopelessness prevailed ; who would trust us ? or 
 rather who could be expected to trust us, with such a fact as 
 that our acknowledged leader, who, in our view, had systema- 
 ised the best practicable defence against Rome, had on full 
 consideration pronounced his and our case a bad one ? 
 However, different people in different places picked them- 
 selves up and began to consider how they could take their 
 share in the battle which they refused to consider as lost. 
 Whether I was the first to start the idea of a newspaper, I do 
 not know. Anyhow the idea was taken up by the knot to which 
 I belonged, embracing James Mozley and Thomas Haddan, 
 who, like myself, had written not unsuccessfully in the 
 " Times," and Church and Bernard, who had signalised 
 themselves in reviews. We, I think, comprised the substan- 
 tial staff of the undertaking. That is, we tried to collect 
 contributors and cash, but made ourselves responsible to each 
 other for finding what was wanting in writing and capital. 
 We expected to succeed in doing good, for it was something
 
 1845 WORK IN LONDON 119 
 
 even to shake out a standard and seem not discouraged ; and, 
 in the'event, to succeed financially. But we were totally inex- 
 perienced in the handling of a newspaper and in the conduct 
 of business. We took the somewhat bold resolution of starting 
 the paper ourselves, dealing directly with the printer and with 
 Haddan's clerk as ostensible publisher and sub-editor. We 
 made an agreement with some printers in Little Fulteney 
 Street, and hired a room opposite the printing establishment, 
 over the shop of a baker, where we could attend or meet to. 
 see what was going on, and where some of us spent the 
 greater part of every Tuesday night correcting proofs, reject- 
 ing or inserting matter, writing articles on the last subjects 
 which had turned up, giving last touches, and generally 
 editing. Bernard, Haddan, and I, being in London, must, I 
 suppose, have done most of this work, but Church and Mozley 
 used to take their share, making use of a bedroom in my 
 lodgings in Queen Street, Mayfair, whither I had migrated 
 from the Temple. To these lodgings we used sometimes to 
 return at four or five o'clock in the morning sometimes, 
 perhaps, later ; for I connect some of these returns home with 
 the smell of bread hot from the oven, on which I think we 
 sometimes made our breakfast. It was on January 21, 1846, 
 that the " Guardian " came into life (simultaneously with the 
 " Daily News ") ; and for nearly six months we must have 
 scrambled on, with plenty of help from writers of our own 
 kidney, but in the lower departments we had no help but 
 that of Haddan's clerk ; and how we managed to get through 
 the drudgery part I hardly now understand. Bernard and 
 Haddan must have been indefatigable. In July 1846 we were 
 lucky enough to find Mr. Martin Sharp to take the manage- 
 ment of our affairs for us as publisher, manager, and osten- 
 sible editor ; the higher editorial duties soon passed into the 
 hands of Bernard. We received also literary help from many 
 friends Northcote, Coleridge, Mackarncss, Burgon, and 
 others.'
 
 120 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. iv 
 
 He goes on to trace the great and well-deserved success 
 of the ' Guardian,' which followed increasingly a few years 
 afterwards. 
 
 In September 1847 he married Georgiana Mary Colvile, 
 daughter of Andrew Colvile of Ochiltree, and sister of his 
 1 .old schoolfellow, Sir James Colvile. At the end of the same 
 year his uncle, Sir John Rogers, died, and his father, now Sir 
 Frederick Leman Rogers, resigned his post in the Audit 
 Office, and went to live on the family property to which he 
 had succeeded Blachford, near Ivybridge, in Devonshire. 
 
 To Miss S. Rogers. 
 
 Landerneau, 2 September 4, 1844. 
 
 My dear Sophy, I suppose my father will have received 
 my hurried note written yesterday immediately on receiving 
 Gladstone's offer of the Registrarship of Joint Stock Companies. 
 I am at present partly occupied in considering how I shall 
 break the matter to Mr. Walter. I suppose my connexion 
 with him may be considered at an end the moment I get a 
 place. I like the notion decidedly as far as my own comfort 
 is concerned. The only doubt I feel is as to its permanence, 
 but as Gladstone says nothing about that I presume I am 
 safe. I have given a distant hint at it in my note to him. 
 At any rate if it offers a fair prospect of permanence it seems 
 to me a thing to be caught at, because if I have an opportu- 
 nity of doing work and making myself known to a few official 
 people it will be much. 
 
 Now to my proceedings, of which I think I brought the 
 history up to Landerneau. We found M. le Comte de 
 Cadeille out, his daughter very Englishified and not wholly 
 improved thereby ; very anxious to be civil but not knowing 
 quite how ; the whole terminating in an invitation to dine on 
 Wednesday. On Sunday (a very hot day) we lounged away 
 the morning in rest, and walked in the afternoon to a place 
 called La Foret, where there was to be what is called a 
 
 In Brittany, not far from Brest. He was travelling with Mr. Church.
 
 1844 HOLIDAY IN BRITTANY 121 
 
 ' pardon,' i.e. a collection of the country people all round to 
 hear vespers, a sermon, join in or see the procession, receive 
 a benediction, and dance. There are sometimes great ' pardons ' 
 hereabouts which people in danger make vows to attend, 
 barefoot, half-naked, or otherwise as the case may be. Here the 
 ceremonial is even greater, the people come from thirty or forty 
 miles round, and the gaieties last three or four days; at Chateau- 
 lin (the place we last came from) there was a ball (assemblee) 
 on Monday, horse-racing, foot-racing, dancing for prizes, &c. ; at 
 La Foret it was only a small ' pardon,' but one of the most beau- 
 tiful sights I ever saw. The church is a picturesque (and very 
 characteristic) Breton church on the side of a hill, looking 
 down on an arm of the sea, and surrounded by trees just so 
 kept as to see the sea (or river as you choose to call it) and 
 opposite bank through. The churchyard, full, almost crowded, 
 with men and women in Breton costume ; the men in enor- 
 mous black flapping hat, dark jacket and trousers, some sashes, 
 some long hair down their backs, occupying one part of the 
 churchyard ; the women in every variety of bright-coloured 
 scarf and apron, very dark gown and brilliantly clean white 
 caps, in the other part ; kneeling, standing, talking or loun- 
 ging, according to tastes and the part of the service that was 
 going on. The kneeling of all the people for the benediction 
 which we saw from the top of the bank on the upper side of the 
 churchyard was beautiful to look at, the crowd of white caps 
 with a crowd beyond of black heads and jackets, and beyond 
 that the sea coast seen through the trees, and all this seen 
 between a frame of the church on one side and a picturesque 
 Breton cross on the other. Presently one or two young fellows 
 got up to the belfry by some steps cut in the roof of the church 
 and set to work there ringing the bells. Out came the pro- 
 cession, the priests, women, crosses, canopy, a crowd of 
 black-headed men and a crowd of white-capped women, and 
 walked round the churchyard, the others kneeling as the 
 Sacrament passed ; and then they are all separated, those who 
 could stay at La Foret to dance &c., those who could not 
 (we among the number) to get home as fast as they could. 
 
 The next day, Monday, we went to Brest, intending to 
 get out to the extreme point (St. Mathieu) ten or twelve miles
 
 i22 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. iv 
 
 further ; but finding no carriage to be had, went up the 
 Chateaulin river (which is very pretty) through the Rade (or 
 Roads) of Brest which forms, I should think, about the most 
 magnificent harbour in the world for steamers. We were put 
 down a mile or two short of our destination (Chateaulin), and 
 found the diligence full, the coupt being occupied by an 
 English officer, a very civil and communicative old French 
 gentleman, and his daughter. So we ' took our feet, in our 
 hand ' and determined to walk our two miles, but hung about 
 to look at a very picturesque and natural-looking dance 
 that was going on about a dozen young girls just come 
 from the fete at Chateaulin, and rather more young men, 
 arranged sometimes in two, sometimes in one line, having 
 hold each of the other's little finger, and dancing, to the 
 singing of two of the young men, a figure that (barring the 
 running under arms) had more the effect of ' Thread my 
 Needle ' than anything else that I can think of. The song was 
 like a somewhat monotonous English country dance, with a 
 touch of the Ashantee. At last the diligence started. Church 
 said ' Look ! ' and I saw the horses turning sharp the wrong 
 way ; in another moment the whole concern toppled and came 
 smash down on its side ; the postilion (as we heard was his 
 habit) was drunk, the leader had been accustomed to go the 
 other way and took the wrong turn, and between them this was 
 the result. The people in the interior were soon out, but, as 
 nobody seemed inclined to help those in the coupe, Church and 
 I jumped up on the coach (the door side was undermost), the 
 fools of Frenchmen holloaing out ' Ne montez pas sur la 
 voiture,' and began to help out our friends. First came the 
 Englishman, covered with blood, but only a little bruised, 
 who proceeded to help the others ; then the young lady, dread- 
 fully cut about the face, her nose laid open, who (perhaps 
 naturally) had lost her wits and, instead of getting out of the 
 way, sat in the window, crying ' Sauvez mon pere,' a thing 
 impossible while she sat there ; next the old gentleman, quite 
 quiet, except that he too had been crying ' Sauvez ma fille,' 
 covered with blood, very pale, and with an arm broken. The 
 only other serious hurt seemed to be an old woman whoeom- 
 plaincd of her shoulder, but more of the back of her head,
 
 1844 HOLIDAY IN BRITTANY 123 
 
 which was bleeding profusely, a good thing as I supposed. 
 She was travelling with her son (a soldier) and daughter, who 
 seemed attentive but not alarmed. After much parleying the 
 surgeon was sent for and arrived, and finding them in good 
 hands we left for Chateaulin, having done what we could to 
 help the young French lady in the matter of luggage &c. 
 They had friends at Chateaulin, who, as well as the Brest 
 brother-in-law, were immediately sent for. The next morning 
 we met the old man walking into Chateaulin with his friends, 
 weak but professing himself better, his daughter's face 
 terribly cut about. But we heard very bad accounts of some- 
 body, whom I take to be the old woman. The priest had 
 been sent for, and had administered extreme unction and 
 they expected her to die. I had no conception of her 
 being so much hurt, and hope it is not true. She sat 
 upright against a piece of timber slightly leaning against a 
 wall, and was able to talk and walk, and help a little in 
 making herself a sling for her hurt arm. 
 
 Tuesday we came here, a most beautiful drive, and after 
 dinner drove to a professed ruin (the first regular humbug we 
 have come across), which Mile, de Cadeille in her injudicious 
 goodness had provided for us, together with a copy of the 
 Nation (Irish newspaper), a history of Landerneau, and of 
 certain mines not far off. 
 
 To-day M. de Cadeille called, a friendly old gentleman, 
 and has thought it necessary to send us to see the Lander- 
 neau racecourse ! he not being well enough to go with us. 
 Conceive being boxed up in his carriage and packed off as if 
 one was the Spanish Ambassador to such a place. How- 
 ever, it is curious. What think you of an old half-Druidical 
 looking cross, opposite the great stand and between the bands 
 of musicians on the top of an exposed heath? We saw an 
 interesting church on our way back, else I should say M. de 
 C.'s civility was unfortunate. However, I must finish or I 
 shall keep his dinner waiting. Love to all, 
 
 Yours affectionately, 
 
 F. R.
 
 124 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. iv 
 
 To Mr. Church. 
 
 October, 1844. 
 
 Dear Church, All is right here. Lefevre exceedingly 
 civil, not at all of a don, and has put me into the hands of a 
 little lawyer named Symonds, now a Registrar of Metropolitan 
 Buildings, who drew the bill and is up to details. Yesterday 
 walked about with them choosing an office, probably close by 
 here in Serjeants' Inn, and a seal of office. I shall soon be 
 immersed in consideration of portfolios, book-binding, modes 
 of pasting documents, ruling lines, managing clerks and 
 messengers, drawing forms, &c. ; at present totally at sea. 
 
 I have had two interviews with Lefevre, and am to have 
 an enormous palaver with Symonds on Monday, and back to 
 Lefevre on Thursday, meantime getting up Acts of Parlia- 
 ment and Blue Books. 
 
 I have an assistant and three or four clerks certain. No- 
 body knows or can guess the extent of work which is to be 
 done ; it seems to me likely to be enormous, and Lefevre 
 tells me that with moderate industry I may in a month or two 
 know more about the matter than any one else and be a 
 person to be referred to by the Board of Trade on these 
 matters ' which we know nothing about.' 
 
 To Mrs. Rogers. 
 
 Guingamp : August 28, 1845. 
 
 My dear Mother, As you see, I am at Guingamp, but 
 without very much to say yet. Lefevre thought there was no 
 necessity for my staying in town, so I started from London 
 by the 3 o'clock train, and from Southampton by the 7 o'clock 
 Jersey packet. About i o'clock the next day we arrived at 
 Jersey, changed instanter to another packet, and arrived at 
 St. Malo about 6 o'clock. At 7 o'clock the next (Wednesday) 
 morning I started for Guingamp, via Dinan and St. Brieuc. 
 My travelling companion from St. Malo to St. Brieuc was a 
 good-humoured, unaffected priest, successor of the Abbe 
 Malais at the Hotel Dieu at Rouen, who talked a good deal 
 about the religious state of France. He gave a most tre-
 
 1845 HOLIDAY IN BRITTANY 125 
 
 mendous picture of it, far worse than I was prepared for. 
 Every one, he said, received their ' premier communion,' but 
 after that never attended a religious service or received any 
 religious instruction, and consequently before a few years are 
 over are positively without any religious idea of any sort or 
 kind. And he would not allow that there was much differ- 
 ence (at least in Normandy) between the country and the 
 town. The rising generation, he said, are worst of all. And 
 the schools (which everybody is almost obliged to attend, 
 private schools not being allowed by the laws) are practically 
 schools of infidelity. He has books to lend to the patients 
 in the Hopital, histories of Rome, lives of good men, &c. 
 If he attempts to lend anything religious the patients tell him 
 ' C'est bon pour les enfans.' However, he said he is sufficiently 
 respected to be able to take possession of all bad books that 
 he finds circulating there, though Government (under whom 
 all these hospitals are) would not bear him out in doing so 
 and have signified as much. 
 
 At 5 we 3 dined at St. Brieuc, and I transferred myself 
 (there being no room in the diligence) to a most miserable 
 little voiture de retour, which got me to Guingamp about 10 
 o'clock. 
 
 To-day I have taken a long walk up the Trieux and back 
 again, and have been rather disappointed. The river is a 
 quiet little trout stream running along a narrow, and not very 
 deep valley, with a slight edging (generally) on one or both 
 sides of water meadow, and beyond that of wood or heath, 
 with rock breaking through occasionally ; water mills every 
 mile or two. This might, of course, be beautiful, but it is not 
 even pretty owing to the want of boldness of form, and partly 
 to the Breton custom of lopping up their trees like the most 
 absurd of our hedgerow elm trees. I think I should say that 
 the want of fine trees was the great mischief. I made two 
 sketches only, one an attempt at water-colours, both failures, 
 but the water-colour sufficiently near success to encourage me 
 to try again. The day was dull and uniform (threatening 
 rain), which made it hopeless for a beginner to make any- 
 thing of colours. I think my attempt would have been much 
 
 3 He was travelling with Mr. Mountague Bernard.
 
 iz6 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. iv 
 
 better if I had had the sun. I had it only for five minutes at 
 the end, just long enough to show me the absurd mistakes I 
 had made. Of course I collected a crowd of dirty children 
 (at least the second time about eight or nine), some jabbering 
 a little French and all a great deal of Breton, and having a 
 great deal of fun. I ascertained that the name of the place 
 I was drawing was Sainte Croix, and inquired the meaning 
 of a phrase which they kept repeating to one another with 
 infinite amusement, pronounced ' allapol ka.' However, they 
 could give me no information except ' c'est ce que M. 
 Maynard dit,' which would have puzzled me if I had not 
 happened to see in a window that morning a set of infamously 
 bad caricatures of which ' M. Maynard ' is the hero. I cer- 
 tainly did not expect even the name of the polka to have 
 made its way down to the dirty little children of a most 
 miserable village in Brittany. 
 
 Yours affectionately, 
 
 F. R. 
 
 To Mrs. H. Legge. 
 
 Le Faou : September 8, 1845. 
 
 My dear Marian, To-day (Monday) we have come into 
 Le Faou, to see a ' pardon ' at a place called Huelgoat, where 
 there is a holy oak. It had, of course, all the ordinary features 
 of a ' pardon,' the costumes were quaint and varied, but the 
 scenery less striking than at the one I had seen at La Foret. 
 But a few peculiar features. People make pilgrimages to 
 Huelgoat, and accordingly we had people walking barefoot or 
 scrambling on their knees round the church, and water being 
 served out to drink, at a holy well close by, at which also 
 people came pressing to wash their feet and hands and say a 
 prayer. But the oddest thing was the mixture of fair with 
 the whole. The first thing was Mass at 1 1 o'clock. We 
 went into the church to have a look at part of the service, 
 preached in Breton, with much variety of tone and apparently 
 very familiar ; then the preacher sat clown for a time in the 
 pulpit and began talking to them (as it seemed to me) in 
 a familiar expostulatory way ; the women all in the nave, 
 squatting down on the ground, a sea of white caps ; the men
 
 1845 HOLIDAY IN BRITTANY 127 
 
 standing in the transepts and sitting on benches, or on the steps 
 of the altar fine-looking fellows, generally with long hair 
 down their backs and a dress something between a Swiss 
 peasant and a gentleman of George I.'s time, very quiet and 
 respectful (except a little whispering) but somewhat im- 
 movable. But after service there was the funniest sequel. 
 Offerings are made at this place to a considerable extent, and 
 those who can't give money may give what they can, a gay 
 ribbon, an old coat, an ornamented child's skull cap, &c. 
 Well, when mass was over, four long-haired young fellows 
 who had been employed to go round the church and church- 
 yard with plates for money, and who are evidently the wags 
 of the village, got up on the steps of the cross in the church- 
 yard, and without delay put up all these offerings to sale to 
 the highest bidder. All the women collected round them and 
 there was a quarter of an hour's high fun about all their 
 ribbons, which, as it appeared to me, did not fetch any very 
 extraordinary price, if indeed they were got off at all. Then 
 came three or four hours' waiting till vespers at 3 o'clock. 
 One or two cabarets opened (Greenwich fair fashion) opposite 
 the church, and a few stalls at which you could get a certain 
 variety of eatables and drinkables, there being one stall for 
 each separate article. Bernard and I composed our luncheon 
 as follows : we bought at one stall a roll apiece which we 
 split, we then went to another stall where a dirty fisherman 
 was frying small fish, of them we bought four (fried on the 
 spot with incredible despatch), deposited them in our rolls and 
 departed to sit down under a hedge to devour them with our 
 fingers and pocket knife, then we came back again and 
 bought a halfpenny-worth of wine apiece at a third stall and 
 the same amount of pears at a fourth ; being in all : rolls, 
 two sous ; fish, one sou ; wine, one sou ; dessert, one sou. 
 And this seemed the general mode of proceeding. Then 
 came vespers, I fear not quite so decorously attended, some 
 of the Bretons having used the intermediate time to get very 
 drunk. A second collection of money by the long-haired 
 young gentlemen, and high romps with some young ladies to 
 get their money from them ; after service a procession, and all 
 went home.
 
 128 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. iv 
 
 Crozon : September 11. 
 
 September 9. Boat to a place called Landevenne on the 
 Brest river. Walk about the country with beautiful views of 
 the river reminding one of the view over the Alf at Prinzes 
 Koppfen. Steam up the Aulne to Chateaulin, an old friend. 
 At Chateaulin the next day we saw the tail of a fete, people 
 dancing for a prize, and a general dance in the evening to the 
 playing of the celebrated hautbois player of the country, a 
 blind man named Maturin. This hautbois with a bagpipe 
 accompaniment was the only music, and so far as I could see, 
 it appeared pretty much going the whole day. What the 
 players' lungs are made of I don't know, I suppose brass 
 and leather like their instruments. About 10 or n o'clock 
 we saw one playing to an increasing party of (then) ten or 
 fifteen, who were dancing with an odd vigorous gravity in the 
 middle of the high road ; at 2 o'clock he was playing to 
 amuse the populace during the foot-races, for men and 
 women ; at three o'clock he began playing to the prize dancers, 
 general dancing began immediately, and about eight o'clock 
 he was still playing in the thick of a hard shower. The 
 dancing is highly funny, half the population of the town form 
 themselves into strings of ten or twenty, and set to work 
 cantering about a dusty place (Tarin.es (which they call the 
 ' champ de bataille ' and entirely fill) with consummate care 
 and deliberation, holding each other by the little finger and 
 occasionally changing the leader after a fashion which I did 
 not understand. How they managed to avoid utter confusion 
 I don't know. But, as they did, the effect of these long lines 
 coiling about, sometimes straight and parallel with each other, 
 sometimes crossing each other and turning sharp round, was 
 very quaint and rather pretty. 
 
 Quimper : September 12. 
 
 Yesterday we drove to a place called Crozon to see some 
 beautiful grottoes and splendid coast scenery (rock) on a little 
 peninsula south of Brest. This thoroughly answered : fine 
 weather, barring a haze, and the things magnificent. Then a 
 drive from Crozon here, where we have just arrived. It looks 
 very pretty, but we have only seen it at night. But perhaps
 
 1845 HOLIDAY IN BRITTANY 129 
 
 the most curious part of the Crozon business was the old 
 scamp of a fisherman who rowed us about. He told us that 
 at the time of the cholera it was fully believed by the common 
 people that the rich (' the nobles ' as he called them) had caused 
 it in order to get rid of the surplus population, and that if it 
 had lasted six weeks longer ' tous les riches auraient et 
 egorges,' a process which he seemed to regard with very 
 tolerable complacency himself. He, I think, plainly believed 
 that the rich and the physicians had been in a league against 
 the ' malheureux,' having, he told us, himself heard the 
 physicians say of a young fellow whom they were attending, 
 ' II faut sauver celui-ci, il fera bon soldat,' and he zvas saved. 
 They did not .know, he said, that he understood French, but 
 he knew what they said. I asked him if the physicians could 
 have saved more men if they had chosen, and then he stuck 
 his tongue out and nodded grimly and made a quantity of 
 contortions signifying ' Let them alone for that.' I think all 
 fellows who are given to Jacquerie have the same way of 
 leering and twisting their tongues about. This man was 
 thoroughly ignorant, had been a sailor and present at the 
 taking of a place of which he could not remember the name, 
 but which turned out to be Algiers, was a long time under- 
 standing that London was the capital of England, but was 
 no inconsiderable philosopher in a practical way, agreed with 
 the rich that there were too many people in France, but 
 thought the proper remedy was a war. Thought it might be 
 no bad thing that one half of the ' malheureux ' might be put 
 out of the world by the management of the ' riches,' no use 
 for the ' malheureux ' to serve out the ' riches ' in that way, 
 they would only fall quarrelling who should have their goods ; 
 often had not bread to put into his children's mouths, but 
 knew that he slept sound and had less ' chagrin ' than a 
 ' riche,' and finished by imposing on us most outrageously, 
 after having shown us the grottoes, I must say, very well. 
 
 I should think it clear that, though the power of the 
 priests is in full vigour, that of the seigneurs is wholly gone. 
 In fact, without the law of primogeniture it can hardly exist. 
 But the division of party seems to me to be between town 
 and country. M. de Cadeille told us that the campagnards 
 
 K
 
 1 30 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. iv 
 
 thought that the bourgeois had done them and got all the 
 good things for themselves in the last revolution, and would 
 take the first plausible opportunity of rising and pillaging the 
 towns. This, however, is difficult, as they are all disarmed, 
 while the town people are not. Half-past eleven o'clock. 
 Good-night. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 F. R. 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 Colonial Office : May 28, 1846. 
 
 My dear Katherine, Here you have my first Colonial 
 date. The Order in Council is to come out to-morrow, at 
 least to be made, and I am appointed here ; with a formal 
 letter of proposal from Gladstone in my pocket. A precau- 
 tion, I suspect, not wholly unnecessary or rather not at all 
 premature, the Ministry being suspected of a considerable 
 amount of ricketiness. 
 
 I am now in possession of a large first-floor room looking 
 out on the park, but with the view rather the worse for certain 
 trees before the windows ; badly furnished, but furniture has 
 been ordered consonant with the dignity of an Assistant Under 
 Secretary ; rather cold, which must be cured by fires, and 
 having the inconvenience that I am able to hear most of 
 the conversation of the clerks in the next room. This has 
 to be cured by a large insertion of sawdust into the walls. 
 
 I had an interview with Stephen 4 on Friday and again 
 to-day. He lectured me for about an hour on the mode 
 of managing the Colonies, and my own position in the office, 
 the features of the latter being that he did not look on me 
 with jealousy or dislike because he looked on me as a pro- 
 bable successor, and that I was to understand that I was a cut 
 above the clerks, and was to ring to have them sent to me 
 when I wanted them. Conceive my telling the messenger 
 to send me forthwith Philip van Artevelde (who is the senior 
 clerk). 5 
 
 4 Sir James Stephen was then Under Secretary for the Colonies. 
 
 5 Mr. (afterwards Sir Henry) Taylor.
 
 1846 EARLY OFFICIAL LIFE i 3I 
 
 To-day I came here to deposit myself at 2 o'clock, and 
 was duly introduced to all the senior clerks, Taylor, our friend 
 Murdoch, a Mr. Blackwood whom I have met at Gladstone's, 
 with two or three others. I hear ominous words as to the 
 dulness of my probable work ; however, that must take its 
 chance. Beginnings are always dull. 
 
 Hitherto I like Stephen. He is the most consecutive, or 
 rather continuous, talker I ever heard flow, with a great deal 
 in what he says, and singular precision of thought and ex- 
 pression and a spice of humour running through the whole. 
 I also like the looks and manner of the people I have been 
 introduced to. Murdoch &c. very friendly. What the juniors 
 may think of the matter I don't know. Nous verrons. 
 
 I have also been to the Emigration Office to Wood and 
 Elliott, both very warm and pleasant ; we soon got our feet on 
 the fender. 
 
 To Mrs. Rogers. 
 
 Steamer off Genoa : December 20, 1846. 
 
 My dear Mother, To set your mind at rest about my 
 having received Lord Grey's letter, 6 I write this, though I shall 
 follow it and perhaps pass it on the road. I received that 
 and your others immediately after having posted the letter in 
 which I say I have not received them. 
 
 With regard to Lord Grey's letter your soul was prophetic. 
 It is an offer of the appointment of Secretary of Governor at 
 Malta with i,5oo/. a year coupled with an announcement that 
 he does not think I possess ' that peculiar aptitude for dealing 
 with large masses of business ' which would be necessary for 
 an Under Secretary of State, and that therefore, in case of 
 Stephen's giving up his place, he would not appoint me. He 
 supposes that I accepted my present appointment with an 
 understanding that I should succeed to that post, and therefore 
 that he is bound to say this. I have written an answer which 
 goes with this letter thanking him, begging to be allowed to 
 
 6 Sir Robert Peel had resigned in John Russell had become Prime Minister 
 
 June of this year, defeated on an Irish and Lord Grey had succeeded Mr. 
 
 Coercion Bill, just after the passing of Gladstone as Secretary for War and 
 
 the Repeal of the Corn Laws. Lord Colonies.
 
 132 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. iv 
 
 defer my answer till two or three days after my return 
 to England, and telling him that no such understanding 
 existed. 
 
 Of course, this announcement (though I could not suppose 
 that any one would appoint me Under Secretary of State all 
 at once) comes in a mortifying shape. But the question is, 
 What is to be done with the offer ? Viewing the matter per- 
 sonally the pros are : higher pay, less work, climate which 
 would suit my health, and a work which would have probably 
 more variety and more independence about it (I should think) 
 than my present, which is simply that of legal cad to Stephen, 
 also if, which I feel to be very possible, Lord Grey is right in 
 thinking that my forte does not lie in dealing with masses 
 of business, the taking a principal part in the actual manage- 
 ment of a small colony might suit me better and show me to 
 better advantage than having to deal with the paper work of 
 the whole. I don't know whether it is a pro or a con that I 
 should hope for the most part to have one of my sisters with 
 me. Then the cons : removal from home, I mean from your- 
 selves, and the chance both of missing higher preferment in 
 England and of missing opportunities of being useful to the 
 other members of the family. The uncomfortable part of the 
 matter is that I am afraid it is in the nature of an intimation 
 from Lord Grey that he would be glad to get rid of me if 
 possible, and if his desire to do so took the turn of depreciating 
 what I did (which, considering my inexperience and Stephen's 
 position over me, it would be very easy for him to effect and 
 almost impossible for me to meet) it certainly would make my 
 position very uncomfortable. I don't think I ought to do any- 
 thing definitive without writing to Gladstone, which I shall do 
 by this post. I should be inclined to be much influenced 
 by seeing what effect Lord Grey's letter had on him. 
 
 It is to be observed that, excepting Governorships, the 
 appointment must be about the most eligible of all of which 
 Lord Grey has the patronage.
 
 1847 EARLY OFFICIAL LIFE 133 
 
 To Lady Rogers. 
 
 Oxford : July 20, 1847. 
 
 Matters here are going on as was prophesied. We are 
 ahead, but it is a near thing. The number of votes given to- 
 day is (I think) 321 for Round, 362 for Gladstone, besides 200 
 others who have paired. A majority of 3 1 on 700 is not very 
 large, but we consider this day has had adverse circumstances 
 about it, and so are in heart for to-morrow. . . . One of the 
 Roman Catholic converts has thought fit to tender his vote 
 for Gladstone. They have stopped his mouth by insisting 
 (as I believe without a shadow of law or right) on his taking 
 the oath of supremacy. The unfortunate pleaded that his 
 name was on the books, that no formal sentence of disability 
 had passed on him, and that he had actually just paid his 
 college dues, for which he produced the Bursar's receipt. 
 However, they stopped him with the oath for that day, 
 and now they find that, as he is in Holy Orders, they can 
 blow him up by application of the 39 Articles, which if he 
 does not subscribe on demand, he will, pro facto, incur every 
 requisite disability. The man is notoriously as mad as a 
 March hare. 
 
 To Rev. R. W. Church. 
 
 9 Park Street : March 3, 1848. 
 
 My dear Church, I ought to have thanked you for your 
 letter and the news in it long ago. But I half expected to 
 have seen you in town as you promised. And now I write 
 principally because if I don't write I sha'n't hear from you 
 again. 
 
 I suppose the Praemunire negotiations 7 between Lord 
 John and our friends have gone off into nothing. If it is so 
 I am not sorry for it. I could hardly fancy anything coming 
 of it, and in some way or other I do not doubt he would 
 have got the best of it ; either he would have taken them in or 
 he would have led them to do something which would have 
 seemed to put them in the wrong. 
 
 7 I.e. the correspondence regarding Lord John Russell's appointment of 
 Dr. Hampden to the See of Hereford.
 
 T 3 4 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. iv 
 
 What do you say to Louis Philippe? It seems clear, or 
 at least is thought so, that he could have put down the mob 
 if he would have authorised firing cannon upon them. They 
 say that the Duke of Nemours says that he himself besought 
 him to give the necessary authority but the King would not. 
 The D. of N. and the Princess Clementine embarked for 
 England in the same steamer, both in disguise, and the Duke 
 was only recognised by one of his children (who was with 
 the Princess) hearing his voice accidentally and crying out 
 ' Ah voila mon papa ! ' Somebody passing the Princess (I 
 suppose English) in the streets (in France) slipped a ten 
 pound note into her hand a curiously thoughtful- thing 
 to do. I don't know whether these latter matters have got 
 into the papers. I believe they are Royal Family gossip, at 
 least they rise in that direction. 
 
 The most alarming consideration to my mind in the 
 matter is that if a war breaks out it will put an end to all 
 Emigration. They must turn us into a War Department. 
 
 How curiously picturesque some of the bits are already, 
 and how dreadfully parallel with the old story ! Does it not 
 strike you that Lamartine's life is in a very uninsurable state ? 
 I should think he would be one of the first to be knocked off 
 the perch as time goes on, probably by the commandant, 
 whoever he may be, of their new penniless brigade. 
 
 People seem rather anxious about Lord John's health, 
 and beginning to speculate what is to happen if he slips off. 
 Some say Peel is ready to take the command. A. Wood, 
 professing to be in the secret, declares that he abhors the very 
 notion. And some protectionists talk of the necessity of 
 reunion against radicalism. They continue to talk of Goul- 
 burn (! !) as a leader. 
 
 To Rev. James Mozley 
 
 9 Ovington Square : April 9, 1848. 
 
 We arc in a good deal of excitement here. 8 Ministers 
 expect regular mischief : the Admiralty is filled with arms and 
 marines. They say that the Chartists make no secret of their 
 
 s The Chartist gathering on Kennington Common was on Monday, April 10.
 
 i48 EARLY OFFICIAL LIFE 135 
 
 intention to have it out ; and, especially, to attack the 
 Government offices. The consequence is that we are all 
 expected to appear at nine o'clock to-morrow, and to stay 
 the night dying at our posts if necessary. Guns are to be 
 had on application at the Treasury, but only in case of special 
 need (in which event of course not a soul would be able to 
 get out of the house), and with a distinct charge that no one 
 is to be trusted with a gun who does not know how to load 
 and fire it or who is likely to be in a very great fright. 
 Elliot, my quondam chief, is extremely grand like a man 
 who feels himself in the face of an emergency to which he is 
 equal a mixture of the man of business, of presence of mind, 
 of decision, and of light-heartedness. Another, colleague 
 fussy, anxious for orders : ' What are we to do ? We must 
 understand clearly what is expected of us ' &c., &c. 
 Downing Street preparing its mind for bloodshed, and for 
 accepting assistance from the Emigration Office (which it is 
 supposed, rightly enough, will escape notice in the bustle), in 
 case they should ' lose any men ! ' Everybody is a special 
 constable ; and constabular rank is regulated by official rank 
 rather a fantastic notion, cos s/j,ol &OKSIV. Some of the fat 
 messengers and skinny copyists who are put in requisition, 
 and whom I saw swearing to do their duty ' without favour 
 or partiality, ill will or malice ' (they say nothing about fear), 
 pass ludicrousness. 
 
 Meanwhile the whole matter, at least the serious part of 
 it, is in the hands of the Duke [of Wellington] ; and I hear 
 from people who are a good deal with him that they never 
 saw him with his wits more about him. The plan hitherto 
 has been to occupy the bridges, and so keep the mob to 
 Southwark and Lambeth, but there is now a rumour that 
 they have changed the locality of the demonstration to 
 Primrose Hill. They obviously should have done this at 
 first ; but I cannot conceive that they can do it now without 
 confusion. At any rate, it is odd if Feargus O'Connor out- 
 generals the Duke. My artillery brother is on duty for 
 Kennington Common, as adjutant ; and I hear he has been 
 riding over to reconnoitre the ground with his colonel. So I 
 suppose they contemplate the possibility of a row on the spot.
 
 136 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. iv 
 
 I hear now it is to be a variety of small rows in different 
 places. They say we are to have several days of it, Tuesday 
 the worst. A French policeman tells Guizot, who tells the 
 world, that he recognises in the streets the faces of many of 
 the most forward people in the French fight. This I had 
 heard said before. We had a report here, which proved false, 
 that there was fighting in Ireland ; but Irishmen say that the 
 fighting there will depend on what happens here. Others say 
 it will wait for an anticipated rise in Canada. 
 
 No ministerial rumours. Everything is merged in the 
 mob. 
 
 Yours affectionately, 
 F. ROGERS. 
 
 To Lady Rogers. 
 
 Plymouth : May 31, 1848. 
 
 Our Irish workhouse girls arrived here by Monday's 
 steamer from Dublin. I got to the Depot just in time to see 
 the lighter (or barge) arrive full of them a very pretty sight 
 it was, one of those picturesque barges with dark red sails 
 full of 185 bright cloaks and shawls of different colours, clean 
 and new, and they came out picturesque but not pretty. In 
 fact, they are generally ugly and clumsy, though healthy and 
 strong, but there was a certain amount of uniform about 
 them which was pleasing. The Presbyterians from Belfast 
 all in grey ill-made gowns and tippets a kind of tweed stuff. 
 Armagh bright brown and white printed cotton. Lisburne 
 checked red shawls, &c., &c. They seemed generally glad 
 to go. I only met with one that wished herself back again, 
 a helpless kind of creature. But they were all excessively 
 disgusted at the notion of being parted from their ' comrades ; ' 
 they seemed already to have selected partners for the voyage. 
 One poor girl was quite in tears at being separated from the 
 other ' Lisburne ' girls, and came to me to remind me that I 
 had promised they should be all together. It turned out 
 that her bag was inside out, which made her number (which 
 was 91) look like 19. When she got to berth 91 there was 
 her name nailed up in the thick of her friends, to her great 
 joy. We have got about 7O Roman Catholics about the
 
 EARLY OFFICIAL LIFE 137 
 
 same, I fancy, of Presbyterians, and rather more of Church of 
 England. 
 
 The Wesleyan matron I hope will do well when on board. 
 She is getting on well with the sub-matrons, and has two 
 daughters who will also be sub-matrons. Meantime she has 
 been blundering about her luggage. It has not arrived, and in 
 an hour or two the ship will be ready to start except for her. 
 Luckily the wind is contrary (it has just become so), else we 
 should have the ' Earl Grey ' with its three masts, captain, 
 crew, and 200 emigrants all waiting in port (perhaps losing 
 the wind) for Mrs. C.'s portmanteau. 
 
 To Rev. R. W. Church. 
 
 Sydenham, 1849. 
 
 Work is slackening with me, and I am meditating some- 
 thing for the ' Christian Remembrancer,' but don't know 
 what. Can you suggest anything better than ' Friends in 
 Council,' Vol. II. ? I have not seen it yet, but think it must 
 be (from what I have read of Helps's) a kind of thing I could 
 prose about. You see the difficulty is want of eyes and of 
 steady working time. 
 
 When Keble comes back from the Isle of Man you must 
 find out what he has to say for himself. My wife gave him 
 a letter to her uncle, the liberal Bishop, 9 who is a very frank, 
 kind, and hard-working person, though of course Whig enough. 
 From all we can hear they seem to have got on very flourish- 
 ingly. The Bishop obviously considers himself to have got 
 rises out of Keble about Miss Sellon &c., and I have no doubt 
 poked him about a good deal. And I see no signs of Keble 
 having given him the rough side of his tongue. Indeed, there 
 is an honesty about him by which I can fancy the said Keble 
 being much taken. But I should like to know. They seemed 
 rather shocked at his ideas of discipline and could not stomach 
 the idea of Bishop Wilson whipping (?) penitents. 1 
 
 9 Lord Auckland, then Bishop of Wilson, Bishof of Sodor and Man, 
 
 Sodor and Man, afterwards Bishop of there is mention of the Bishop's strict 
 
 Bath and Wells. discipline. 
 1 In Keble's Life of Dr. Thomas
 
 138 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. iv 
 
 To Rev. Edward Rogers. 
 
 9 Park Street : August 11, 1849. 
 
 We have of course been going on quietly enough here. I 
 find not much office work (of which I am glad) and I think 
 the eyes are a little improving. Our principal event is a run 
 down to Eton for Election Saturday. We betook ourselves 
 to Pickering, who, of course, was all that was hospitable. 
 We cabbed to Surly Hall, and got into his punt to see the 
 fireworks, and very interesting it all was. The boys looked 
 so like gentlemen, with so much freedom and no misbehaviour. 
 It certainly is a noble nursery for an English university. No 
 wonder gentlemen are not radicals. I really seem to myself 
 to be almost thrown back into one's old steady-going or 
 rather rampageous Tory ways of thinking by looking at the 
 old place and the young people. Pickering gave a very good 
 account of their behaviour, especially in re church ; and James 
 Mozley, who spent three or four days there with one of the 
 Hawtreys, was much struck at the tone (inter alia) of the 
 speeches at Election Monday ; so much more serious than 
 our ' Gaudes ; ' and he was surprised to find that ' strong ' 
 men like Abraham 2 were viewed with so little suspicion or 
 prejudice even by Dons and Provosts. . . . 
 
 You will probably have seen that Sir H. Jenner 3 has 
 given judgment against Gorham on the ground that Baptismal 
 Regeneration is the doctrine of the Church of England. 
 People talked of a secession in consequence, but that is all 
 nonsense, I take it. It is really, however, a very great point 
 gained. It puts a large mass of heterodox people into a 
 state of mere sufferance, to say the least, and probably will 
 make them feel that they live in glass houses. 
 
 2 Afterwards Bishop of Wellington Bramford Speke, to which he had been 
 in New Zealand. appointed. Sir H. Jenner's judgment 
 
 3 Sir H. Jenner was Dean of Arches. was reversed by the Judicial Committee 
 The question was whether the Bishop of the Privy Council, and Mr. Gorham 
 of Exeter (Dr. Phillpotts) could refuse to was eventually inducted. 
 
 institute Mr. Gorham to the living of
 
 1850 139 
 
 CHAPTER V 
 Continuation of Work as Commissioner of Emigration. 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 London : June 12, 1850. 
 
 I HEAR no ecclesiastical or political news. There seems a 
 lull in both departments. The report that Dodsworth, Allen, 
 Henry Wilberforce, and some others are going over forthwith, 
 does not seem yet true, though I am afraid it can be no more 
 than a respite, which, if so, is worth little. Keble is getting, 
 I think, very much put out at the Romanisers, imprimis with 
 their attacks on Pusey, whom some of them who are gone do 
 not scruple to describe as possessed by the devil. Perhaps 
 this was mentioned by Church while you were with us. 
 
 G. has just told me an amusing story, which I dare say 
 you have heard, of the Nepaulese ambassador who is the 
 great lion just now. Passing St. Paul's he suddenly told the 
 carriage to stop, and spoke a few words to a Hindoo who was 
 sweeping the crossing, on which the man threw his broom 
 over the churchyard, gaily got into the carriage and drove off. 
 That evening the man was at Lady Londonderry's party 
 dressed up in all sorts of magnificent toggery, and all the 
 world was saying how much pleasanter it was now that the 
 ' princes ' had got an interpreter. Rather a sudden rise in 
 life. A curious importation of Oriental ups and downs into 
 the City of London. 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 9 Ovington Square : September 10, 1850. 
 
 Did I tell you that I made acquaintance with Edward 
 Barnard, who acted as chairman to a dinner given by the
 
 140 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. v 
 
 ' Fire Annihilator Company ' to which I was asked ? He 
 was friendly and amusing, talked a good deal of our family 
 and more of Eton, and told some good old Eton and Colonial 
 Office stories. The ' demonstration,' as they called it, of their 
 ' annihilator ' was certainly remarkable. They set on fire a 
 long tank (I think fifty feet by six) of pitch, shavings, tur- 
 pentine, &c., and when the whole was in a blaze ten or twelve 
 feet high, two men with machines like large ill-conditioned 
 watering-pots, walked slowly from one end to the other, just 
 sweeping the fire out as they went. In the inside of their 
 machine was a composition which when ignited threw forth a 
 kind of steaming gas that totally put out any flame which it 
 came into contact with. Then they set on fire a lot of com- 
 bustibles in the between decks of a barge while the company 
 were all walking on the deck, and just smothered it out in two 
 or three minutes with these same watering pots, after allowing 
 it to blaze up through the hatchways, sending up (I should 
 think) twenty feet high or more of flame. Lastly they set on 
 fire a lot of combustibles inside a. plank house ; and when the 
 flame had broken the windows and was blazing out of every 
 aperture, put the whole out with their pots saving the plank 
 walls. Of course, the object was to get us to force passenger 
 ships to carry their machines, which was perfectly obvious to 
 one or two large shipowners who were part of the party, and 
 one of them rather disturbed the harmony of the evening by 
 gruffly protesting against having inventions fastened on them 
 and tried at their expense ; ' he didn't see why such a set was 
 to be made at the shipowners, let the householders first be 
 told that they must all supply themselves with annihilators 
 and then it would be time to come upon the shipowners.' 
 
 Ever yours, 
 
 F. R. 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 Ovington Square : November 23, 1850. 
 
 In re the Pope, articles in the ' Guardian ' (the last of which 
 was mine, the one before Haddan's) express pretty much my 
 views. 1 It is a matter against which the Church of England 
 
 1 The Pope had issued a bull estab- to take their titles from certain sees 
 lishing a hierarchy of Bishops who were which he constituted. There were, of
 
 1850 WORK AS COMMISSIONER OF EMIGRATION 141 
 
 may properly protest, but I- think the great hubbub one of 
 the most arrant pieces of humbug that was ever got up by a 
 Whig Minister for his own ends. The more I think of it the 
 more I think it so. How Lord John is to get out of his 
 letter I don't know. Wiseman seems to me to demolish him 
 absolutely. They say his colleagues dislike his skft at the 
 Roman ' mummeries.' I expect there will be a patch up at 
 the expense of the Church, and perhaps under the auspices 
 of H. M., who is believed to have set it going. I don't my- 
 self expect so much harm to the Church from this kind of 
 mere vulgar outbreak as from the distribution of Church 
 patronage. The mob outcry will wear itself out and then 
 common sense, as it does in the end, will get uppermost. 
 
 Manning, Dodsworth, and Aubrey de Vere are going 
 together to Palestine. I suppose they will join Rome out 
 there, at least I don't suppose any one would join Manning 
 and Dodsworth who did not intend to follow them. I hear 
 cases of disquiet every here and there. 
 
 However, I don't see any shaking in our clique ; Keble is 
 as firm as a rock and stouter in acquiescing in aggression 
 against Rome than I ever thought to see him. There is a 
 degree both of attack and of liberalism in my articles which 
 I feared he would not approve. But he does wholly. 
 
 Mozley is setting to work with a book on Baptism. He 
 declares there has been no thinking for the last twenty years, 
 not even by Newman, so he is going to give the world his 
 thoughts, which I am afraid will not wholly give satisfaction. 
 As if we had not enough to torment us, he is bitten by St. 
 Augustine's Predestinarianism. I believe Wynne will try to 
 
 course, Roman Catholic Bishops already inveighing against the Papal usurpa- 
 
 in England, and it mattered little if tion, and against Tractarianism, in the 
 
 they took their titles from Westminster strongest terms. A strong anti-papal 
 
 &c. , but at this particular time the agitation with much bitterness on both 
 
 claim of the Pope to divide England sides was the result. Eventually the 
 
 into dioceses seemed to some a dange- Government passed the ' Ecclesiastical 
 
 rous aggression, connected (as to some Titles Bill,' which made it penal for a 
 
 extent it was) with the conversions Roman Catholic Bishop to assume a 
 
 which had followed the Oxford Move- title from any existing See. It was not 
 
 ment. Lord John Russell very unwisely a very dignified form of protest and as 
 
 wrote a letter (on November 4), ad- a piece of legislation was quite nuga- 
 
 dressed to the Bishop of Durhan 1 , tory. It was repealed in 1871.
 
 142 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. v 
 
 keep his All Souls Fellowship. But the report of 's trying 
 
 to keep his rectory I take to be false. When I was at 
 Abbotsford a letter arrived from him to say that he had 
 resigned, and was there for a few days to pack up his things 
 for a new residence, and (this was the object of his letter) 
 wanted to know whether Hope could tell him anything 
 about the cheapness of cooking by gas \ Pound a monkey in 
 a mortar and his monkeyism will not depart from him. . . . 
 Northcote, I hear, is working hard at country knowledge and 
 begins to know one breed of cattle from another ; I hope he 
 will get into Parliament. 
 
 G. and I went (with an order of his) to see the buildings 
 of the Exposition. 2 It is a very remarkable sight. Some- 
 thing itself between a gigantic green-house and a gigantic 
 railway station. But the singular part was the appearance of 
 rapid rise that it had ; so much space occupied, so many 
 things going on, saw-pits, circular saws, forges, all kinds of 
 carpenter shops, iron skeletons rising here, glass being put in 
 there, holes for the foundation elsewhere. And the ingenious 
 machinery for cutting into shape the window frames, each bit 
 passing through almost as many hands as a pin does, all this 
 gave a marvellous idea of promptitude and order. The thing 
 itself is wonderfully light. One can hardly conceive its 
 standing. Foundations it can hardly be said to have at all. 
 Slender columns of iron set in pits about four feet square and 
 two deep, rilled with concrete, are all that the building is to 
 stand on. I calculated that some of these columns would 
 have to support each about seventy square yards covered 
 with people and goods, independently of the building itself. 
 We were there when the dinner bell rang (there are about 
 2,000 people at work), and the effect was like stirring an 
 enormous ants' nest ; there was a general bustle overhead 
 on the roofs, galleries, &c., all clustering round the ladders, 
 crowding, clambering, and sliding down, and streaming down 
 all the aisles from the workshops and works. 
 
 '-' Sir Stafford Northcote was one of the most active commissioners for the 
 Exhibition of 1851.
 
 1851 WORK AS COMMISSIONER OF EMIGRATION 143 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 Ovington Square : April i, 1851. 
 
 My dear Kate, I hear that Lord John is after all in 
 again with just the old set I cannot help hoping, however, 
 that he has lost a remarkable amount of credit and can't last 
 very long. You will have seen by the papers all that has 
 taken place and I can tell you no more. 
 
 I went, however, with Church (who has just left us) to the 
 debate in the Lords last night. Stanley was excellent, so 
 gentlemanly and natural. 3 It struck"~rne very much how in 
 all his behaviour about the crisis, he had been a thorough 
 gentleman without losing any advantage which he was bound 
 to take as a politician and the head of a party. The grounds 
 on which, in the first instance, he threw back on Lord John 
 the onus of forming a coalition Ministry seemed to me very 
 well taken and well brought out. 
 
 I am not at present dissatisfied with the state of things. 
 Stanley and Gladstone could not have coalesced with honour ; 
 so I am glad they have not. I am also glad that the first 
 great move has been taken, and that with so much weight 
 and resolution against the Papal Aggression row, by Lord 
 Aberdeen and Sir J. Graham. It cannot fail to have weight. 
 And you will see that Stanley in effect gives the question 
 very much of a shelving by the parliamentary inquiry which 
 he proposes. Then he brings the question of Protection to an 
 issue which is obviously intended to set it at rest. If he fails 
 to get a Protectionist parliament next general election, he 
 says, he and his friends are prepared to take it as a fait 
 accompli. This will be a great stumbling-block out of the 
 way, and it is a great thing that his party are made to feel the 
 necessity of coalescing with some of the Peel party ; indeed, 
 it almost looks as if Stanley wished to make them feel it. It 
 was impossible, I thought, to gather whether he felt any 
 bitterness towards Gladstone and Co. for not joining him 
 (he was short but complimentary and dropped nothing) ] 
 fancy that the subs do. 
 
 3 Lord Stanley did not succeed his this year, but he had been called up to 
 father (as I4th Earl of Derby) till June of the House of Lords in 1844.
 
 i 4 4 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. v 
 
 What I must rejoice at is that there is no Peelite and 
 Whig fusion. I suppose Graham will before long join them, 
 but I do trust he will leave his party behind him. How 
 closely they do or do not hold together at present there is 
 nothing at all, as far as I hear, to show. I ought to say that 
 the papers have dropped the last sentence of Stanley's last 
 speech which told very well. You will see that Lord Lans- 
 downe attacked him for not believing fully the Ministers' 
 statement of the reasons of their resignation. He replied by 
 pointing out the hurried precipitate way in which it had 
 been done ; the noble Marquis was safe at Bowood all the 
 time, a noble Earl (Carlisle) first heard in the City that there 
 was no cabinet for him to belong to, the Lord Privy Seal, a 
 relation of the Premier, was as ignorant of his intentions as 
 of those of the Pope, ' and ' (then he leant forward across the 
 table and raised his voice like a person in thoroughly good 
 humour with all the world and his own joke) ' and his noble 
 relation didn't even pay him the compliment of saying, 
 " TJiere's something that concerns you ! " I don't know how 
 the hit reads, but it quite told on the House, and I can't 
 understand how the reporters missed it. There was good- 
 humoured ' Put that in your pipe and smoke it ' in his 
 manner of doing it which was perfect. 
 
 My impression is that Stanley will have gained in public 
 estimation by the really handsome, manly, and clever way in 
 which he has done the whole thing. His tone was very con- 
 ciliatory towards the Peelites, and I should hope (though I 
 don't know) that a coalition with some of them hereafter was 
 facilitated, rather than otherwise. 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 London: September 18, 1851. 
 
 I have had William Froude ' for a few days here, but he 
 is off to the Mediterranean to cruise with the captain of a 
 steam ship of war. Among other things he is to go to 
 Alexandria to see about the possibility of removing Cleopatra's 
 needle, as the Pasha of Egypt has given in. We had a great 
 
 ' The civil engineer, brother of Hurrell Fronde and of James Anthony Froude
 
 1851 WORK AS COMMISSIONER OF EMIGRATION 145 
 
 discussion as to what he should see in going through France 
 and I flatter myself I have made out a very good fortnight 
 for him. He had not time for the Exhibition, but took me 
 through Maudslay's (the great engineer's) works. Most 
 striking they are. The size of everything was wonderful, 
 but what was most wonderful to me was to see punches 
 and shears cutting through iron plates an inch thick like so 
 much soap. To say that they cut it as quietly as scissors cut 
 paper is below the mark. The shear (almost a foot long) came 
 down and went through with a steady, tranquil, noiseless soft- 
 ness as if it met just with no resistance at all. Since that I 
 have been trying to get up the cotton-making machinery in 
 the Exhibition and have made some way towards under- 
 standing a mule and a power loom wonderfully beautiful 
 contrivances both of them. But I am shocked to find how 
 close I must get to a thing to understand it. 
 
 The news of the gold in N. S. Wales is at last officially 
 confirmed. Sir C. Fitzroy sends a sketch of one lump weigh- 
 ing forty- seven ounces. Thousands are off from Sydney, 
 making a sensible difference, he said, in the population. Of 
 course, many are wholly unfit for the work, and it did not 
 appear how they were to feed or to travel along the 200 or 
 300 miles which they had to get across. Ships can't get off 
 from the desertion of the sailors, and we here cannot get ships 
 to go to Sydney (for that reason) except at the most exorbi- 
 tant prices. I trust we shall make a better affair of it than 
 California, but with a convict population to deal with I don't 
 envy the Government. Of course, no one but Government 
 has a right to lay a single finger on a single grain of gold ; but 
 there are not the physical means of preventing them from 
 helping themselves. 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 London: 1851. 
 
 1 was amused the other day at a police dodge, which I 
 had never heard before, practised at the opening of the Ex- 
 hibition. They had at the gate a bunch of detectives 'of all 
 nations,' and as the chevaliers cTindustrie of all nations came 
 in, the police gave a sign, and the check-taker gave them a
 
 i 4 6 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. v 
 
 green instead of white or yellow card. When they got in, the 
 employes were directed to show all the gentlemen and ladies 
 with green cards into a particular inclosed quarter of the 
 building, so that each ' swell ' as he arrived was civilly handed 
 on till he was finally shown into a family party of his own 
 friends. Of course no exit was allowed. I can't help laugh- 
 ing at the thought of the fellows one after another coming 
 in with their best behaviour on, and looking out for a place 
 near a good victim, and becoming gradually alive to the fact 
 that they were all old friends of a sort. It must have been 
 worth while being one of the first comers, to have seen how 
 all the rest took it. 
 
 I have lots to do, so good-bye. Love to all. I suppose 
 you have seen in the paper Lady Buckinghamshire's 5 death. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS. 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 Ovington Square: April 10, 1852 
 
 The official despatches from Victoria fully bear out the 
 reports of the gold which you will perhaps have seen in the 
 * Times.' The Governor, Latrobe, seemed fairly appalled by 
 it. He wrote that two tons a week were coming in, and 
 seemed quite to think that there was no end to it. He now 
 asks for ships of war, regiments of soldiers, &c. The Hudson's 
 Bay people have also found some in Queen Charlotte's Island. 
 If the Imperial Government are wise they will lay hands on 
 part of that for themselves. But I hope they will have it 
 worked through the Hudson's Bay Company, which will 
 increase our profits. 
 
 All this is highly important as to the sale of Hoo. (i I 
 should be much more disinclined to sell now that a real change 
 in the value of money seems so much more imminent. Before 
 long I should think that, even in anticipation of this change 
 
 5 An aunt of his wife's. She was a years before, and died nearly half a 
 
 daughter of the first Lord Auckland, century after, the death of Pitt, 
 
 and would have been married to Pitt, 6 A farm belonging to the Blachford 
 
 but for the want of money on both sides. property. 
 She married Lord Buckinghamshire five
 
 1852 WORK AS COMMISSIONER OF EMIGRATION 147 
 
 everybody will be calling in their mortgages and trying to 
 exchange them for purchases, i.e. to turn their money debt 
 into land. This, on the one hand, will tend to make it diffi- 
 cult to get or keep money on mortgage, and on the other will 
 raise the price of land. But the former tendency will be 
 counteracted by the rush of gold which will increase the quan- 
 tity of money seeking some kind of investment. 
 
 To Rev. Edward Rogers. 
 
 London: February 23, 1853. 
 
 I write just now to finish my account of my dinner at the 
 Duke of Newcastle's while it is fresh in my head. I was next 
 but one to Lord Clarendon and opposite to the Duke of 
 Leinster, Lord Carlisle, and Lord Lyttelton. Lords Carlisle 
 and Lyttelton talked diagonally to Lord Clarendon and the 
 Duke, so that I was in good company, and after I had been 
 spoken to and said my little say, I was privileged to listen as 
 one of the group. Lord Clarendon was the talker and most 
 agreeable. Without many stories or elaborate bons mots, he 
 had a neat way of capping everything and carrying it on, 
 with just enough in his answer to make you laugh. They dis- 
 cussed a good deal different people. I shall just attempt heads 
 of a dialogue about Lyndhurst and Brougham. They were 
 lauding Lyndhurst and saying how genial and agreeable he was, 
 especially in the House, and ' all without a touch of display or 
 intention to exhibit.' Lord Cl. : ' Not a bit of it, he is just 
 beginning his display ; he said to me the other day, " I must 
 have a bill of my own. There is St. Leonards has six bills, 
 all enormous ; then Brougham has three ; and little Cranworth, 
 he has two. I must find something to reform, I must have a 
 bill too." ' Then came Brougham's turn. Lord Lyttelton 
 observed how he got on with half the sleep of ordinary mortals. 
 ' He lives two lives, that man.' Lord Cl. : ' H'm. Yes, and 
 one a very disorderly one. However, he's an uncommonly 
 good fellow, no one would do more for a friend.' . . . But 
 the best sight was after dinner. I heard behind me Mr. 
 O'F., an Irishman just deserting from the Brigade, lecturing 
 Lord Clarendon on the proper mode of governing Ireland, a
 
 i 4 8 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. v 
 
 regular case of veteran diplomatist versus impudent Irishman. 
 Lord Clarendon was (and intended to be) the centre of a circle, 
 with his shoulders well against the chimneypiece and his coat 
 tails under his arms, and heard him out with the gravest of 
 patiences. Mr. O'F. was telling him how Ireland should be 
 conciliated by paying the priests. Lord Clarendon heard him 
 well out and then began deliberately, ' You see unfortunately 
 there is in this country a universal impression that the Catholic 
 priests in Ireland are disaffected. People here think that 
 they would one and all be very well pleased to see Louis 
 Napoleon in possession of Ireland, or England either ' (then 
 he got well upon his legs and fixed his eyes, which have a 
 kind of cold glitter about them, very firmly on O'F., as if he 
 could look, and was looking, clean into him), ' and don't you 
 think that impression is well founded ? ' O'F. admitted it was, 
 and very sad too, but then you have a state of things to deal 
 with, and what is to be done ? Lord Clarendon (very delibe- 
 rately and rather solemn) : ' It is with the greatest reluctance, 
 after great hesitation, contrary to all my prepossessions, after 
 the most obstinate struggles to avoid it, that I have come to 
 the conclusion that nothing at all is to be done. Nothing is 
 of any use. Every concession has been merely made a step- 
 ping-stone for a further demand, and it is plain that what the 
 priesthood really want is not equality, but to be placed in the 
 position now held by the Established Church.' Then he 
 became rhetorical and rather violent. ' When was a govern- 
 ment more just, more anxiously impartial, more thoroughly 
 desirous to act without respect of parties than Lord John's 
 administration of Ireland '(rather cool) 'and how was it treated? 
 With ' (espressivo inolto] ( the grossest ingratitude.' O'F. 
 acknowledged the merits of ' your Lordship's government,' but 
 Lord Clarendon went on with a peroration which was only 
 stopped by Lord Carlisle's offering him a seat in his brougham, 
 which he accepted, and receded sideways, giving it to O'F. to 
 the last moment, so that a reply was impossible. It certainly 
 was no bad specimen of ' Put that in your pipe.' But the 
 beauty was that, while the energetic outburst of feeling was 
 going on, if you looked at Lord Clarendon's face you saw that 
 iced cucumber was a joke to him in coolness. He was just
 
 1853 WORK AS COMMISSIONER OF EMIGRATION 149 
 
 keeping his cold sharp eye steadily fixed on the man, without 
 a vestige of expression in his face except that of keen watch- 
 fulness. What he said was perfectly true, and there was every 
 reason why he should believe it. But when you looked at his 
 face you could not help saying, ' Now, you don't believe a 
 word of what you are saying, and what in the world are you 
 saying it for ? ' It was evidently intended that O'F. should 
 communicate it to the Brigade, and I could only suppose it to 
 mean, ' Now, the last time we had dealings together we prepaid 
 you, and you sold us. Next time we don't intend to give you 
 a single concession till we have got your votes.' On the 
 whole it was certainly a good specimen of politico-diplomatic 
 life and quite as good as a stage play. 
 
 The Duke of Leinster came up during the harangue and 
 struck in. ' He had been a Liberal all his life, but a stand 
 must be made,' &c., so I suppose the Ministers have made up 
 their minds, having got the pick of the Brigade, to hold the 
 rest at open defiance. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 F. R. 
 
 To Rev. R. W. Church. 
 
 Ovington Square: April u, 1853. 
 
 I was glad to hear of your visit to Winchester, and had a 
 kind of half hope, though not much bigger than a whole wish, 
 that you might have come up to Oxford to vote for the 
 Registrarship. I went ; and made that an excuse for taking 
 down a party, and getting a luncheon for them out of James 
 Mozley. I think our people deserved a severe snub from their 
 non-resident friends for so breaking up our interest as to give 
 nobody a chance. Neither Cornish nor Rawlinson, as matters 
 stood, were justified in going to the poll. Lake, I hear, kept 
 Rawlinson in the field in spite of his appearing in the minority 
 in the promises. 
 
 How the Protectionist party is knocking to pieces ! Do 
 you remember J. B. M.'s simile (in his article on Newman) of 
 a ship sailing through floating bits of timber ? Gladstone's 
 position seems rather like it. The mere weight of his move- 
 ments throws off all the trifling atfacks of Dizzy and Co.
 
 1 50 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. v 
 
 they just knock against his sides and float off. I should 
 ratheY like to know how far his budget was put forward 
 because it was best abstractedly for the country, or what 
 degree of skill had been used in making it ' go down,' e.g. 
 buying the ' Times ' by the free supplement, Manchester by the 
 legacy duty on land, 7 &c. &c. The landholders fas S. F. N. 
 says in the ' Guardian ') have not got much but an argument, 
 which, too, he will not allow them to use. 
 
 To Rev. R. W. Church. 
 
 Ovington Square: Dec. 29, 1853. 
 
 My dear Church, You are too bad ; Thursday is the 
 only day in this week before Friday on which I dine out. 
 Why in the world did you not come on here at once from 
 Sparkford, instead of pottering back to Oxford, where you 
 cannot have anything to do ? A bed is exceedingly at your 
 service. If you would take it we should at least see one 
 another on Friday morning. Do come. 
 
 The Ministry is a bad job. I don't know what to expect. 
 But I have expressed myself fully in the 'Guardian.' If 
 Gladstone has anything Conservative in him, he will find it 
 difficult to remain in a Ministry which must eventually be 
 thrown on Radical support. But he is so really powerful 
 a man that whatever shakes, and delays, and loss of time 
 there may be, he must come up near the surface. I expect 
 he will show the best i.e: most politically powerful side of 
 himself as Chancellor of the Exchequer. Pursuing details 
 is so much his power, if only he is not run away with by it. I 
 think, if it is not a paradox, he has not poetry enough for the 
 formation of a first-rate judgment. He has an immense mass 
 of knowledge most methodically arranged, but the separate 
 items must be looked for in their respective boxes, and do not 
 float about and combine. The consequence is, not merely 
 want of play, but that crotchety, one-sided, narrowish mode 
 
 ' In Mr. (Gladstone's famous Budget stamp duty was abolished two years 
 of 1853 the additional stamp required later. The same Budget of 1853 intro- 
 for supplements was taken off, and a cluced the succession duty for real pro- 
 single stamp of a penny covered the perty. 
 whole copy, whatever its size. The
 
 1853 WORK AS COMMISSIONER OF EMIGRATION 151 
 
 of viewing a matter uncorrected by the necessary comparisons 
 and considerations, which people call ingenious and subtle 
 and Gladstonian. He looks at the details, not the aspects of 
 a subject, and mastered it, I should imagine, by pursuing it 
 hither and thither from one starting-point, not by walking 
 round it. And financial subjects will, I suppose, bear this 
 mode of treatment better than any other. When they don't 
 bear it, they bear it down with a kind of tangible power which 
 makes onesided views impossible. 
 
 What do you say to the formation in the Cabinet of a 
 Graham, Palmerston, and Molesworth party? 
 
 To Lady Rogers (Lady Blachford}. 
 
 Feb. 5, 1854. 
 
 Edward drove me over to Kingsbridge in the dog-cart, 
 where, after waiting some three hours, we saw the proceedings. 
 Sir Stafford Northcote's speech was a repetition of his Newton 
 one, which has been printed and circulated, with certainly the 
 most admirable effect on the election. Everybody on the 
 Low Church side is rather more pleased than one likes 
 with the disclaimer of Puseyite parsons. Northcote apologised 
 for it to me by the necessity of the case and the absurd ex- 
 travagance of the Newton parsons, and said he had taken the 
 opportunity at Exeter of setting himself right by abusing the 
 laity for the fifth of November riots. The people were dull 
 and one could not see that they were on one side or the other 
 during the speech, which was fluent, clear, but without any 
 special points. The fencing afterwards was much better. 
 He is capital at that. He just hits at once those good- 
 humoured answers, which with an agreeable, amused manner 
 are ' the right thing.' One man started the opposition on the 
 Tory side an honest old stuttering tradesman, I should think, 
 of what people call ' the right sort.' He told us he had always 
 been a C C Conservative, or rather a T T Tory, ' that 
 the hon. baronet was evidently a man of great ability, and, he 
 believed, an honest man, and was going to be our member,' 
 but what he didn't like was these four names, Courtney, 
 Acland, Kennaway, Durant. ' Did the hon. baronet know 
 that Sir T. D. Acland always voted against the other three
 
 152 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. v 
 
 c >unty members ? ' N. ' No, indeed, I don't ! ' ' The hon. 
 baronet must know that.' N., with overpowering innocence 
 and urgency, ' No, indeed, I assure you I don't. There are 
 certain questions respecting Free Commercial policy, which 
 certainly Sir Thomas Acland does consider settled, and 
 others hitherto have not, &c., but, &c.' ' Then does the hon. 
 baronet know that Mr. Durant proposed a Whig candidate 
 for Totnes ? ' (Durant sitting behind laughing.) ' Well, now 
 he has seen the error of his ways, for, you see, he is proposing 
 a Conservative.' ' Well, all I can say is I should like to have 
 seen the name of Sir John Duller there.' ' Well, so should I, 
 but surely Mr. - - would not have had the member for 
 the county do so unconstitutional a thing as to put his name, 
 &c.' Then came a Radical who wanted answers to these 
 questions: i. Ballot, 2, I forget, 3. whether N. would support 
 the law of Primogenitureship.' ' Primo-how-much ? ' from the 
 crowd. N. ' I will take the last of the three questions first. 
 I am an eldest son, and I think the law of Primogeniture a 
 capital law. And I think if I didn't take care of my own 
 interests, the Kingsbridge electors would think I wasn't very 
 well able to take care of theirs.' ' I want to know, if all these 
 boroughs are disfranchised, whether the hon. baronet will vote 
 for giving Kingsbridge a member ? ' 'I think I must wait till 
 after the election before I answer that question, and then I 
 shall see whether the Kingsbridge electors are sufficiently en- 
 lightened to send a member of their own to Parliament.' 
 Northcote speaks at Plymouth to-morrow, and at Totnes 
 on Tuesday. I shall not be at home till Wednesday morning. 
 
 To Rev. R. W. Church. 
 
 Ovington Square : March 16, 1854. 
 
 So you went up to vote against Pusey, the Heads, and the 
 ' Record.' I got rowed by J. B. M. for not going up, but I own 
 that residents seem to me to manage their tactics so ill (cases 
 of Rawlinson and Hanscll) that I have ceased to obey their 
 calls, and certainly don't intend to do so unless either I have 
 a strong conviction of my own, or our party is united with a 
 prospect of success. My brother Edward had to go up and
 
 1854 WORK AS COMMISSIONER OF EMIGRATION 153 
 
 vote in duty to Pusey against his convictions so far as he had 
 formed any. 
 
 People seem to me in an odd state about the war, perhaps 
 because I am so myself. Nobody has any genuine enthusiasm 
 about it, but a discontented cry of ' I suppose we must,' 
 caused by a factitious indignation against Russia. I hear it 
 said that the Emperor's proposal a year or two ago was that 
 we should take Candia and Egypt and he what he liked, to 
 which we replied that we could not entertain the idea of dis- 
 membering Turkey. Then Sir H. Seymour left St. Peters- 
 burg in more or less of a huff, saying he must take care that 
 the whole truth (meaning about another matter) must come 
 out, that the Emperor then thought he meant- the publication 
 of their secret negotiations, and so took the initiative in order 
 to take off the edge of our publication. The result is that he 
 has placed us at liberty to publish what otherwise would have 
 remained confidential. Meanwhile the military people and 
 Rothschild persevere in saying it will all come to nothing. 
 Lord Raglan, that there will not be a shot fired, but the whole 
 settled by manoeuvring. Lord Seaton's is the same story. 
 Others, that the Russians announce their intention to make 
 the war defensive : whether this involves holding the principali- 
 ties, non liquet. 
 
 Also rumours of great quarrellings in the Ministry. The 
 ' Press ' is trying hard to cocker up Lord John into holding 
 hard by his Reform Bill, by which they flatter him that he 
 will outlive Peel. Reform is to stand in the eyes of posterity 
 with Magna Charta and the Bill of Rights, and Johnny to be 
 greater leading Opposition than serving in the Ministry. Report 
 is pretty distinct that he, Graham, and Lord Granville, if any- 
 body, are the three (alone) who would quit office rather than 
 the Reform Bill. But people are hardly to suppose that the 
 remainder can hold office without them. 
 
 I had an amusing run to Devonshire to do what I could 
 for Northcote ; and certainly it is very pleasant on such an 
 occasion to find yourself inheriting a family influence even 
 though not a very large one. In only one case did I hear the 
 idea of politics broached, it was always that ' I always have 
 voted with the family and intend to,' and this in one or two
 
 154 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. v 
 
 cases from little landholders, not tenants. I asked whether our 
 asking for votes would be considered intimidation, but it was 
 clear that far from this it was considered a friendly compli- 
 ment. We were told every here and there that ' - - says he 
 would vote with your honour if you or Mr. Edward would 
 ask him,' all very flattering to one's self-importance. It 
 makes me understand (not justify) the tenacity with which 
 people cling to extent of encumbered property. 
 
 I have been reading ' Dante ' and ' Anselm.' They are most 
 excellent, and make one wish, like the ' Guardian/ that you 
 could find time to write a history of something. You really 
 owe it to yourself. It is provoking to feel that you are wasted 
 on these ' Guardian ' articles, good as they are for the paper 
 and probably (I confess) better for your pocket than your 
 first large production. 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 Ovington Square : March 28, 1854. 
 
 Of course, people are in a flutter (more than excitement) 
 about the war: especially 'my colleague' Wood, who is 
 evidently anxious to have a finger in the war pie, not un- 
 naturally, as so many of his relations are in the thick of it 
 in different ways. He took me down yesterday to look at a 
 transport which is taking artillery from Woolwich. We just 
 came in upon them as they were hoisting the last horse or 
 two in. And a very pretty animated sight it was. I suppose 
 you know how it is done. The horse is put in a sling, craned 
 up twenty or thirty feet into the air, where he plunges and 
 kicks out to his own satisfaction, then in that position wheeled 
 round till he gets over the hatchway and let gently down 
 through the said hatchways to the bottom of the ship, where 
 the men are waiting to rush in upon him and mob him into 
 his place The arrangement is this. The hold had a good 
 broad passage down the middle with a row of horses each 
 side, nose inwards, packed as close as they could be. It 
 looked all very comfortable at the moment when we saw it, 
 but one thought what a turmoil there would be when the 
 ship began to roll and plunge. They were separated each
 
 from each by bars padded more or less, and there were pads 
 also behind, bars also in front, so that they had not much 
 room for being riotous. 
 
 We fell upon Sir Hew, who was civil, asked after my mother 
 and discussed matters. They have sent off some ships already. 
 Each is complete in itself and is to make the best of its way to 
 Gallipoli. 
 
 Wood tells me that when Lord Raglan and the rest were 
 at Paris the Emperor expressed great surprise at the rapid 
 way in which we had got all our men to Malta, and said they 
 could not do it. Satisfactory to our authorities ; only we 
 have not got our horses, and I understand that till they arrive 
 the infantry might just as well be in London. 
 
 Our Oxford affairs are getting into a considerable mess. 
 The younger party of our friends have taken up University 
 Reform, and have in conjunction with Gladstone pretty much 
 framed the Government bill. On the other hand, Pusey (who 
 draws with him Keble and Marriott) has joined the heads 
 in thinking it revolutionary, and -now on Friday I receive 
 dunning letters from Mozley and Rawlinson to come up to 
 vote against a petition which Keble and Pusey and Marriott 
 will agitate for. I don't know whether it is sneaking, but I 
 shall simply not trouble myself to go. I don't care enough 
 about the bill pro or con to vote against either section of my 
 friends. It is not good enough or bad enough for that. It 
 seems by no means impossible that it may be simply shelved 
 by the war. 
 
 Was not the secret correspondence amusing ? It is not 
 often that one has such a peep behind the scenes. Sir H. 
 Seymour must evidently be a sharp fellow, he sees so clearly 
 the real English of things, and is so prompt (at least on his 
 own showing) in taking advantage of openings. 8 
 
 I am glad to see by to-day's proclamation that we give 
 up the great ' neutral bottom ' question, i.e. that we don't pro- 
 fess any longer to touch Russian goods in neutral vessels. It 
 will tend, of course, to prevent us from choking the trade of 
 
 s This refers to the proposals which the dominions of Turkey, as being the 
 the Czar made to the English Ambas- goods of ' a sick man.' 
 sador, Sir H-. Seymour, for partitioning
 
 156 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. v 
 
 any country with which we go to war. But, after all, I think 
 every step towards making war less generally disagreeable is 
 a point gained. 
 
 To Rev. R. W. Church. 
 
 8 Park Street : May 25, 1854. 
 
 My dear Church, I sincerely congratulate you, first on 
 receiving a son and heir, secondly on receiving him on the 
 same day as Martin R. Sharp, and thirdly on Her Majesty's 
 birthday. Is he to be named Victor ? Give my kindest 
 regards to Mrs. Church and the little gentleman, and let me 
 know some time or other how they are getting on. I had my 
 usual birthday dinner last Saturday and was lucky in getting 
 a good deal of talk with the Duke, Lord Hardinge, and Sir 
 Hew Ross (the Lieut-General of Ordnance). They all seemed 
 (in spite of the ' Times ' Commission) proud of their arrange- 
 ments, and the Duke said that a friend of the Emperor's (of 
 the French) had been telling him that Canrobert from Gallipoli 
 and the military authorities at Paris are complaining how 
 much worse off their soldiers are than the English who came 
 out with their tents and their beer and every comfort men 
 could invent for them. Lord Hardinge was severe on the 
 people who wanted chairs in their tents, and observed that 
 for some years they had no tents at all in the Peninsula, till 
 a year or two before the end of the war the Duke got them. 
 He thought the Czar's conduct of the war ' very disgraceful, 
 coming up bullying to Kalafat, concentrating masses of troops, 
 and all the rest of it, and then being obliged to shorten his 
 line and fall back.' I tried him on Omar Pasha. But he did 
 not very much respond ; a clever man, but had made his line 
 of defence much too long. I suggested his success, on which 
 he observed that a man sometimes got a good deal of credit 
 by the blunders of his opponents. 
 
 Also I made Sir George Grey's (New Zealand) acquain- 
 tance. He goes out in the independent Church (of England) 
 line, which he considers almost necessary to support society 
 in New Zealand. In this and other things he said that he 
 was very much struck in coming to England with the way in 
 which we lived for the present. In the colony whatever you
 
 1854 WORK AS COMMISSIONER OF EMIGRATION 157 
 
 do or plan is calculated with a view to what it will or ought 
 to be twenty or fifty or a hundred years hence. Here nobody 
 looks a year before them. 
 
 I suppose this is very true, especially as regards Govern- 
 ment. Indeed, I never have been able to see how a really 
 representative Government could be far-sighted except in the 
 way of removing obstacles to the natural action of the society. 
 People have not in the mass patience enough, or faith enough 
 in any of their representatives, to endure anything that is only 
 to have prospective advantages, involving of course large pre- 
 sent sacrifice. 
 
 I have also just shaken hands and exchanged words with 
 Selwyn. 9 Just what he was in the fifth form at Eton. I 
 was much struck with his way of walking up and down talking 
 to his old and some new friends : there was a kind of lofty 
 frank independence and Trappy a- la about it, rather like a 
 savage yet very like a bishop, a combination of humour and 
 dignity and unaffectedness and elasticity that recalled one's 
 old feeling of having got hold of a great man, long lost. I 
 must finish. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS. 
 
 To R. W. Church. 
 
 Ovington Square : Sept. 15, 1854. 
 
 My dear Church, At last I am discharging my very bad 
 conscience of the letter I owe you, and, I am afraid, without 
 much prospect of writing a letter worth receiving. Till lately 
 I have been at work either on things which it was difficult 
 to put off, or on the largest question I have had yet, being 
 little less than a Legislative Declaration of Independence on 
 the part of the Australian Colonies. The successive Secre- 
 taries of State have been bidding for popularity with them by 
 offering to let them have their own way. And in professed 
 pursuance of these offers they (New South Wales, Victoria 
 and South Australia) have sent home laws which may be 
 shortly described as placing the administration of the colony 
 in a Ministry dependent on the representative assembly, and 
 " The Bishop of New Zealand.
 
 158 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. v 
 
 abolishing the Queen's right of disallowing Colonial Acts. 
 What remains to complete colonial independence except 
 command of the land and sea forces I don't quite see. I shall 
 be interested to see what comes of it. It is a great pity that, 
 give as much as you will, you can't please the colonists with 
 anything short of absolute independence, so that it is not 
 easy to say how you are to accomplish what we are, I sup- 
 pose, all looking to the eventual parting company on good 
 terms. 
 
 Also I have been getting Keble to compile a prayer-book 
 which we shall put on board all our emigrant ships. I shall 
 send you a copy to look at when it is printed. I am rather 
 proud of it, though only the channel. 
 
 I am afraid Keble is a good deal put out with Gladstone ; 
 he writes severely and substitutes ' Mr. Gladstone ' for 
 ' W. E. G' l If I could be sanguine about what people call 
 ' things in general,' i.e. about our own strength, I should be 
 sanguine about the effect of the University Act, Dissenters 
 and all (not that I would have supported the latter part). I 
 can't help thinking that if Dissenting tradesmen begin to 
 send their sons to Oxford, it might chance that the effect 
 would be just that the Church would appropriate some of the 
 best blood of Dissent, the very people who would otherwise 
 be most effective against her. 
 
 To Lady Rogers. 
 
 Ovington Square : August 2, 1855. 
 
 Wood tells me that somebody (I think Lord Hardinge's 
 son) has been dining with Pelissier and says that the Depart- 
 ment of Works has run up for him a fine house and garden, 
 with reception rooms, smoking pavilions, clocks, carpets in 
 short, all the Parisian meubles and luxuries that can be in- 
 vented, simply on the notion that it is appropriate to the con- 
 dition of a commander-in-chief. And this while Layard and 
 the ' Times ' were abusing Lord Raglan for having a cottage for 
 himself and staff. 
 
 1 It is noticeable that this circle of (Wilberforce), &c. In many cases the 
 
 intimate Oxford friends nearly always full surname has been substituted for 
 
 wrote of oneanother by initials, ]. H. N. the convenience of modern readers. 
 (Newman), J. B. M. (Mozley), H. W.
 
 1855 WORK AS COMMISSIONER OF EMIGRATION 159 
 
 To Right Honourable W. E. Gladstone. 
 
 9 Ovington Square : August 15, 1855. 
 
 My dear Gladstone, I cannot help writing to say (if it is 
 not impertinent) how very much I am hoping that you will 
 print your speeches on the war. 
 
 People seem to be gone mad, but I hope not so mad but 
 that they are capable of being gradually affected by truth. 
 And I don't know where else they are likely to get it. I am 
 afraid I am asking you to increase your chance of being 
 stoned. But as I see you are well quit of London for your 
 holiday, your martyrdom is at any rate respited till next 
 session. 
 
 I cannot say how much satisfaction I felt in reading in 
 your speeches all (and much more than all) that I had myself 
 been longing to hear said with effect. 
 
 Ever yours sincerely, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS. 
 
 To Right Honourable W. E. Gladstone. 
 
 8 Park Street : October 12, 1855. 
 
 My dear Gladstone, I must thank you for sending me 
 your speeches. I had observed that they were published, 
 but did not know where to get them. It was a great satis- 
 faction to study them again. They put the world in your 
 debt, a good deal more, I am afraid, than the world is likely 
 to acknowledge. 
 
 The average specimens of the public whom one meets are 
 still, even when they profess themselves anxious for peace, 
 so terribly exacting in their terms. 
 
 I see by a note that you have sent to this office that you 
 are looking into the progress of Emigration. Is there any 
 special point on which we are likely to be able to give you 
 information ? 
 
 Ever yours sincerely, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS.
 
 160 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. v 
 
 To Rev. R. W. Church. 
 
 Blachford : November 28, 1855. 
 
 My dear Church, I have but half a morning for lots of 
 letters which ought to have been written long ago, so I must 
 despatch you summarily. George Mayow 2 (you know whom 
 I mean) writes that Windham was appreciated before the 
 Redan business. Col. Wood told him (Mayow) that he 
 (Wood) was in command of a battery 3 when they found the 
 Russians almost on them, skirmishers among their numbers. 
 The Captain asked W. what he was to do ; W. told him he 
 could not retire, but, seeing Windham, galloped up to him 
 to ask assistance. Windham was Sir G. Cathcart's quarter- 
 master (qu. general ?) and had been sent by him to order up 
 Torrens's brigade to succour his disastrous advance, which he 
 was doing. Windham looked for a moment, said ' Yes, I 
 see,' and shot off to Torrens to ask for a regiment or two. 
 Torrens (knowing Cathcart's straits) hesitated for a moment, 
 when Windham (his junior officer) said that as senior on the 
 staff of T.'s commanding officer he ordered him officially to 
 send up two regiments to save the battery. It was done, and 
 Cathcart before he was killed approved it. But, as Mayow 
 writes, a man must have tolerable nerve to force down the 
 throat of his senior officer a movement which both of them 
 know to be directly contrary to the instructions he had 
 received from the common superior, whose authority he appro- 
 priated, and when both of them also knew that superior to be 
 in the utmost extremity. What strikes me most is the entire 
 confidence he must have had in being right, and on a snap 
 judgment. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 F. R. 
 To Rev. R. W. Church. 
 
 Park Street : March 18, 1856. 
 
 My dear Church, I am glad you and Mrs. Church like 
 ' Dorothy.' 4 The characters seem to me very good, also the 
 
 - Colonel Mayow was Major of the 3 At Inkerman. 
 
 1 7th Lancers in the Light Cavalry 4 A novel by his sister-in-law, Mrs. 
 
 Charlie at Balaclava. Paul.
 
 1856 WORK AS COMMISSIONER OF EMIGRATION 161 
 
 gradual accumulation of bereavements and depositions on 
 Dorothy and the mode in which Lance's return after a long 
 absence brings sharply back on you the contrast between 
 what was and what is, is very good. . . . We have finished 
 Orme, which is admirable. I was quite struck, on taking up 
 Froissart for the first time the other day, to see how much it 
 reminded me of Orme. The mixture of chronicling with 
 lively graphic touches and descriptions, the mutual considera- 
 tion of the great belligerents for each other, abject population, 
 floating bodies of mercenaries, vast variety of minute move- 
 ments and individual feats, are quite remarkable. And the 
 contrast between Edward III. and John Company only makes 
 it better. Certainly the Frenchmen </zV/mess it. We are now 
 on Macaulay. How absurdly diffuse or rather minute he is ! 
 It seems constantly as if he had some one touch which he 
 could not resist, and gave you a couple of pages of trifling 
 detail in order to avoid the appearance of lugging it in head 
 and shoulders. 
 
 Did I give you a couple of Crimean stories I got from 
 Wood ? I shall repeat them on the chance. 
 
 His brother-in-law, Col. Brownrigg, was aide-de-camp to 
 Brown when they took Kertch, and was sent by him to ask 
 Col. Autemarre (the Frenchman in command) to stop plunder. 
 The answer he got was : ' Mais, mon cher, je ferai tout mon 
 possible pour le general tout mon possible : mais vous savez 
 bien que je n'ai fait la guerre qu'en Afrique, et la, mon Dieu, 
 on tue toujours les habitants! 
 
 The other was the account of a horse artillery man in 
 Colonel Wood's troop, a fine fellow six foot high, who was 
 taken at Kinburn. He seems to have pleased the general in 
 command, and was had up to be shown to a party of Russian 
 officers and gentlemen. One came forward from the rest and 
 questioned him in very good English. ' All the men in his 
 troop were not of his height ? ' ' Yes, he was pretty much the 
 average standard ' (terrible lie). ' How many strong did your 
 troop land ? ' ' Well, sir, when we take Russian prisoners, we 
 don't ask them these questions ' (lie again) ' and I shouldn't 
 like to get my comrades into a scrape. I'm in your hands, 
 sir, but I hope you won't ask me any questions.' Well, he 
 
 M
 
 162 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. v 
 
 was told he needn't answer anything but what he chose, then 
 * Would he like to go to England ? ' ' No, he would rather 
 go back to stay with his comrades as long as they stayed in 
 the Crimea.' ' How long was that to be ? ' ' Why, sir, we 
 expect to be there five years.' The Russian pricked up his 
 ears at this : ' What was to keep them five years in the 
 Crimea ? ' ' Why, sir, we think in my regiment that the 
 nation won't be satisfied till they haye made the enemy pay 
 the expenses of the war, and we don't think we can bring him 
 down to that under five years.' This amused the questioner 
 greatly, and he told it all to the rest, and after a little more 
 talk told the man he should be sent off by the next vessel 
 that went to Odessa to go back to ' his comrades,' which was 
 accordingly done ; and it appeared that the inquisitive gentle- 
 man was no less a person than the Emperor. This was the 
 man's account, and I suppose was roughly true. 
 
 My brother 5 has been back at Woolwich for the last few 
 weeks. He is getting steadily better ; but it will be a long 
 time before he is strong again. One feels a continual fidget 
 lest he should be doing something absurd and making himself 
 ill again. 
 
 To Rev. R. W. Church. 
 
 1856. 
 
 It is astonishing to me how little people talk of politics. 
 I suppose the Gladstone and Disraeli combination means a 
 large amount of mischief. But there is no keenness about it 
 in those people whom you meet. It seems as if people really 
 did not much care who was in, so long as they were not bored 
 by Income Tax or otherwise. As for the Chinese war, which 
 seems to me one of the greatest iniquities of our days, nobody 
 seems to care sixpence about it. I was half alarmed, by the 
 way, the other day, lest I should be found responsible for it, 
 by allowing to pass the Colonial Ordinance under which Sir 
 J. Bowring has been making a fool of himself. 6 It xvas our 
 
 5 His artillery brother, Henry, who British flag and claim British protection 
 had returned from the Crimea dange- was the only warrant which Sir J. 
 rously ill. Bowring ( Minister at Hongkong) had for 
 
 6 The clause providing for the regi- the outrageous bombardment of Canton, 
 stration of vessels which could hoist the It came out afterwards that even this
 
 1856 WORK AS COMMISSIONER OF EMIGRATION 163 
 
 business to report that it should be referred to the Board of 
 Trade ; and if instead of doing so we (or rather I) had 
 reported it unobjectionable I might have had the reflection 
 that a blunder of mine had been a link in the chain of causes 
 of all this slaughtering. I was relieved to find, however, that 
 we were all right. I cannot help suspecting that our friend 
 Dorney Harding has got rather into a mess, though it is one 
 which John Bull will pull him through. 
 
 I have been reproaching myself for some time for doing 
 nothing for poor people, and have begun (faute de mieux] 
 reading aloud to patients in St. George's Hospital now and 
 then. I do so wish I had a turn for it ; but I have never 
 felt visiting of that kind anything but an annoyance. And 
 this revives all the dissatisfied shyness that I used to feel in 
 former times at such things. Is there any medicine for such 
 a moral diathesis ? 
 
 I have been reading Newman's letters on Universities (printed wVi^r 
 first in a newspaper) and have been rather struck by his 
 ingenuity in proposing an avenir for Ireland. He feels that 
 some rivalry with England must be got up, and that as far as 
 governing power goes John Bull must in the nature of things 
 be lord and master over Pat ; of course, though, they could not 
 be otherwise : ' tu regere imperio.' But he holds out the bait 
 of an intellectual supremacy which shall make Dublin the 
 Athens of modern civilisation, the centre of mind and letters 
 to all who speak the great English language, which is over- 
 spreading the world. And really it seems a bright idea. One 
 hardly sees what might not be made of Irish invention and 
 brilliancy if it would submit itself to a good intellectual 
 training. 
 
 But he seems to me terribly behindhand in supposing 
 that by merely establishing a centre of Catholic learning he 
 can draw all the world after him as people did in the middle 
 ages. He seems quite to forget that barbarous ignorance 
 
 clause did not apply, since the ' Arrow ' parties, among them Mr. Gladstone and 
 had not been registered at the time, and Mr. Disraeli, joined in condemning 
 was a Chinese vessel both in law and Sir J. Bowring's action, which was 
 in fact. Leading politicians of both approved by Lord Palmerston. 
 
 M 2
 
 1 64 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. v 
 
 and the inaccessibility of centres of learning are not the evils 
 of the present day, and that he himself has to fight, not with 
 the ignorance of the people, but the rivalry of Queen's 
 Colleges ; in fact, that sharp fellows and educational institu- 
 tions are rather a drug than otherwise. However, it is very 
 interesting. 
 
 How does Montaigne get on ; and when does it come out ? 
 I am glad you are publishing at last with your name. I don't 
 
 call r^-publishing the same thing 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 F. R. 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 8 Park Street : Sept. 9, 1856. 
 
 I have been reading Wiseman and Newman's ' Callista ' and 
 Fabiola ' (both worth reading), and I think I must review 
 them slightly in the ' Guardian,' though I have not a great deal 
 to say. One thing I am mightily amused with, which is the 
 marked way in which Wiseman (whose scene is laid under the 
 persecution of Diocletian) brings into light the old Christian 
 families in whom the faith was hereditary and who had 
 furnished in each generation their martyrs to the cause. All 
 his principal martyrs are hereditary Christians, while an 
 impracticable convert, who is all for flying in everybody's face, 
 courting martyrdom &c., is the ' Judas ' of the story, betraying 
 his brethren is punished repents and is restored. Newman's 
 great character, on the other hand, is St. Cyprian, who is 
 delicately made to point out how he is a convert and how all 
 the apostates were hereditary Christians, who are described as 
 almost universally torpid, only to be roused in fact by the 
 martyrdom of a convert. Wiseman gives a good deal of 
 interesting topography and Christian antiquities, and a lively 
 plot with some absurdities, and some beautiful incidents or 
 passages. Newman gives some very fine scenes and very fine 
 characters with a good lot of sharp satire, somewhat wanting 
 in delicacy of touch. It is odd how both of them fire on 
 heathenism almost as a living personal enemy : Newman 
 most vigorously, as he hits at Protestant England (the nation 
 rather than the Church) over the shoulders of Pagan Rome.
 
 1 
 
 1856 WORK AS COMMISSIONER OF EMIGRATION 165 
 
 To Rev. R. W. Church. 
 
 8 Park Street : December 10, 1856. 
 
 I have been trying, at the instigation of Moberly, of New 
 " College, to get your name into circulation for the Ecclesiastical 
 History professorship. It seemed extravagant to suppose that 
 Lord Shaftesbury would allow Lord Palmerston to appoint the 
 Proctor who vetoed the censure on Newman. But there is some 
 good always, I think, in putting a man's name about. However, 
 I could do nothing, as I imagine Stanley is to be the man. So 
 at least, affirms Bonamy Price. 
 
 I have marvellously little to say for myself. Indeed, I feel 
 a most aged inability to care about things except the little 
 matters I have in hand myself, official prospects, Blachford 
 buildings, and cuttings and plantings and exchangings, and 
 altogether what intimately concerns self. As to office, it seems 
 more and more clear that I am to go to the C. O., and more 
 and more doubtful when it will happen. Not just yet, cer- 
 tainly, and in time anything may turn up. For the present, 
 I suppose, I shall have an easyish time of it here for some time, 
 plenty of opportunity for doing something else if I had it in me. 
 I am beginning to think my own liberalism will come to a 
 crisis one of these days. I got into a controversy with Keble 
 about divorce, and am besides half afraid to think of look- 
 ing him in the face from feeling so out of his line on the 
 Denison case. 7 I arn only glad you and Bernard are able to 
 treat it as you do, but I confess the Articles seem to me in- 
 superable, and it is a very unpleasant feeling that if I told 
 Keble the truth I should say that his subscriptions are incon- 
 sistent with what I understand to be his belief. And I must 
 say that St. John vi., taken as a prophetic exposition of the 
 
 ~ A charge had been made against with sentence of deprivation. The 
 
 Archdeacon Denison in 1854 that a Court of Arches, on an appeal, in the 
 
 sermon preached by him the previous following year reversed this decision, 
 
 year contained doctrines about the and absolved Archdeacon Denison from 
 
 Eucharist which were inconsistent with the charges, on the ground that more 
 
 the Articles. Judgment was pronounced than the prescribed time had elapsed 
 
 against him by the Diocesan Court of between the alleged offence and the 
 
 Bath and Wells on October 22, 1856, beginning of the action.
 
 166 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. v 
 
 sacramental doctrine, and culminating in 77 <rapj; OVK 
 
 ouSsv, seems to me to carry you out of the stream of thought 
 
 which culminates in Roman or semi-Roman doctrine. 
 
 Have you looked at Helps's ' Conquest of America ' ? It is 
 well worth reading, except that it really makes one boil too 
 much. The unbridled treachery and ferocity of the Spaniards 
 passes all I had imagined. And somehow it is, to me, more 
 terrible to see Christians cruel to heathens than vice versa. 
 There is the triumph of martyrdom on one set of accounts to 
 set against the dreariness of successful cruelty, but here the 
 crime of the tyrants is greater and more one's own, and the 
 compensation of the persecuted less. It makes the Papal act 
 which handed America over to the Spaniards a terrible deed. 
 There is such a contrast between the stupendous power which is 
 affected in such a transfer, and the utter want of qualification 
 for its proper exercise, which is evident in the act itself and 
 all that followed on it. However, I must be off. Kindest 
 regards to Mrs. and Master Church. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS. 
 
 To Lady Rogers. 
 
 August 26, 1857. 
 
 My dear Mother, I think I got as far as Chambciy in my 
 last letter, which, as far as I was concerned, was somewhat of 
 a failure. It is exceedingly prettily placed, among good 
 Savoyard hills, but the heat made the smallest distance for- 
 midable, and so there was hardly any getting out of the town, 
 and in the evening we were seduced by a laughing little cham- 
 bermaid to go and see what she called ' la vogue,' which is sup- 
 posed to be a kind of guinguette, and expected to see the world 
 and his wife nicely dressed and looking fresh and gay ; but it 
 was a mere stupid crowd, disturbed every now and then by a 
 procession of men arm in arm, with a noisy drum at their head, 
 going up and down the town with a vague intention of 
 amusing themselves or somebody else (it was hard to see 
 which), but without quite sense or spirit enough to make a row. 
 Besides I got cheated at Chambery. Next day a drive to Ugine, 
 a beautifully placed village, at one end of a mule ride which
 
 1857 WORK AS COMMISSIONER OF EMIGRATION 167 
 
 leads to Sallenches. We came into Sallenches after dark 
 (near 1 1 o'clock), and next morning, getting out of the inn 
 door, I got my first view of Mont Blanc, blazing white with 
 flying clouds, sometimes hiding more, sometimes less, of his 
 head. Georgie and I had a pleasant morning walk on the 
 side of the valley opposite to Mont Blanc, getting fine views of 
 him (broken by clouds) from time to time. Next day to 
 Chamonix, by a fine valley with some wild defiles, and noble 
 views of the .different groups of ' Aiguilles ' which form the real 
 beauty of Mont Blanc. I fancy Mont Blanc to be a magnifi- 
 cent mass of pointed peaks, of which the highest are so high 
 up and so close together that the perpetual snow has actually 
 buried them. But, however that may be, the peculiarity of 
 Mont Blanc is that the two summits, the Calotte and the Dome 
 du Goiiter, are flat lumps, like the ordinary shape of an English 
 granite pile, while they are supported by a most beautiful forest 
 of peaks advancing out in all directions, and forming a kind 
 of pinnacled wall round the great snow field, through which the 
 ice pours down into the low country wherever it finds an opening. 
 Our first great expedition was to the Flegere, a point high up on 
 the side of the valley opposite to Mont Blanc, from which you 
 see its whole line spread out right and left as far as you can 
 see, the white domes above, but not greatly above, everything 
 else, and the aiguilles stretched out in front of them in a kind 
 of battle array, graceful and beautiful beyond everything, with 
 the great glaciers pouring through them here and there like 
 enormous cataracts. That evening we crossed the Glacier des 
 Bossons and the next day crossed the Mer de Glace. S. was 
 unequal to the Bossons, G. and E. were unequal to the Mer de 
 Glace, but nobody went off without seeing a glacier and standing 
 on it. It is certainly very wonderful. The immensity of the 
 mass of ice is striking, the deep light blue which is discovered 
 by any chasm or new fracture of the ice is almost unearthly 
 (there are no blues, however, tell Kate, equal to the Rosenlaui), 
 and where the ice passes over a great fall in the ground it breaks 
 into a magnificent imitation of rocks and waves (' pyramides ' 
 they call them on the Glacier des Bossons), but to me they were 
 more the satisfaction of a curiosity than actual enjoyment. 
 From the Isere, the Flegere, the Tete Noire, and Vevey, I
 
 1 68 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. v 
 
 seemed to myself to be sucking in pleasure. But on the great 
 torrents of ice one seemed rather to be examining and taking 
 in something very wonderful, though, no doubt, the peaks in 
 which you were enveloped were very beautiful too. I think 
 that a glacier is not a thing for zVz7<<? enjoyment. I suspect the 
 true pleasure of the ice is in hearty exertion, when a man feels 
 that he has a good day's work before him and is doing it. 
 
 To Rev. R. W. Church. 
 
 8 Park Street : November 16, 1857. 
 
 So we are inside Delhi and Lucknow, at last. I suppose 
 it will hardly do to ask what we did when we got in, at least 
 to Delhi. It must have been a frightful business. I feel 
 what you say about the heathen. These facts seem to sweep 
 away one's sickly faint view of the Ammonites and such 
 people, and to suggest a wholly different and more terrible 
 picture of the deserts of a heathen nation. It is curious how 
 these realities (to use the cant word) seem to drive people 
 back on a Jewish state of mind. I mean how people jump at 
 once to the idea of bloody and sweeping punishments 
 administered to a whole community, for example or ampu- 
 tation's sakes. 
 
 I hear that the day before the telegraph came in the Govern- 
 ment sent Sir F. Thesiger, who has a son-in-law (Colonel Inglis, 
 in command), daughter, and grandchildren there, a despatch 
 from Colonel Inglis to Havelock which must (of course) have 
 been received here by last mail. Colonel Inglis said that he 
 had taken the command with 300 fighting men, that these of 
 course had been reduced by casualties, that he had then 20 
 guns bearing or playing on him, that all were on half rations, 
 and had enough to last them at any rate till the 24th, and 
 hoped they could hold out till then, that he thought the enemy 
 did not know the state they were in and that, to prevent their 
 learning it, he had not allowed a single message to be sent 
 out except this despatch, and that if Havelock wished to 
 communicate with him he had better send a verbal message 
 
 o 
 
 by any native whom he could trust, with the password ' Agra.' 
 I suppose he must have felt when he sent this that it was
 
 1857 WORK AS COMMISSIONER OF EMIGRATION 169 
 
 likely enough to be the last message that any Christian would 
 receive from any inside the fort. 
 
 When Thesiger told my friend this, he had just received 
 in court this post's telegram, ' Lucknow relieved,' and of course 
 was in a swim of excitement, and rushed home, leaving all 
 his causes to take care of themselves (if they came on) and 
 begging somebody to make what apology or excuse he could 
 .... I have just come back from attending the funeral of 
 an uncle whom you may recollect near Southampton General 
 Rogers (then Col.), the last of my father's brothers.
 
 i7o LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vi 
 
 CHAPTER VI 
 Mission to Paris on the Coolie Question, 1858, 1859 
 
 SIR F. ROGERS spent a considerable part of these two years 
 in negotiations in Paris about the terms on which the French 
 should be allowed to import coolie labourers into their colonies. 
 He has left the following notes of the manner in which the 
 negotiations began : 
 
 ' The English nation, while its own interests are not very 
 visibly and gravely concerned, has a strong vein of philan- 
 thropy, but it is in regard to negro slavery that this feeling 
 has so taken hold of the people, and is so powerfully organised 
 as to become a political influence. Partly on this account 
 and partly also, I doubt not, from genuine conviction, Lord 
 Palmerston had taken up this particular question, and felt 
 himself bound to assist, if possible, certain plans of the French 
 Government for conducting an immigration from the West 
 Coast of Africa to the French negro colonies, which was 
 supposed to have hitherto covered a disguised slave trade. 
 
 ' The French Government, pressed by its planters, did not 
 venture simply to suppress this, and, I take it for granted, 
 replied to a remonstrance by pointing to our own coolie emi- 
 gration (which it had for some time been my special function 
 to superintend). At any rate, Lord Palmerston, then Premier, 
 and Lord Clarendon, then at the Foreign Office, suggested to 
 the French that, if they would give up their African emi- 
 gration, they might be allowed to take coolies from India to 
 their colonies on the same terms (mutatis mutandis] as those 
 on which they were taken to English colonies. Neither the 
 India Office, nor the Colonial Office, much liked this arrange-
 
 1858 MISSION TO PARIS 171 
 
 ment, because it appeared probable that, since we had not 
 been more than able to protect the coolies in our own colonies, 
 we should be less than able to protect them in those of France ; 
 and so the evil of quasi-slavery might exist, the responsibility 
 of it merely being transferred from the Foreign Office (which 
 was bound to protect the Africans) to us, or rather to the 
 India Office, which was bound to protect the Indians. 
 
 ' However, the first step was that the French should under- 
 stand what would be the terms to which the planters would 
 be bound to submit in importing coolies from India, and I was 
 bidden to call on Persigny. Persigny was on the whole much 
 pleased, and in course of time desired that I should be sent to 
 Paris to be examined before a committee of which Prince 
 Napoleon, then Minister of the Colonies, was chief, and then 
 settle the details of the question. 
 
 ' Persigny struck me as not having much in him ; he liked 
 to talk as if he were conducting large affairs with large views, 
 and at the same time was competent to descend into the 
 minutest particulars ; but he did not show that grasp of prin- 
 ciples in their practical bearing which makes what I should 
 call the " man of capacity," and which saves principles from 
 becoming loose and airy, and details from becoming petty, as 
 they do in the hands of political and commercial projectors, 
 who overwhelm you with one or the other project without 
 impressing a man of sense with any certainty that it will work 
 as it is expected to work. Some time afterwards I happened 
 to speak of him to Lord Stratford de Redcliffe, as not having 
 much impressed me (Lord Stratford having just been stay- 
 ing with him at a country house). He said that Persigny had 
 nothing in him, no suite in conversation, or tact : " He said to 
 me " (and he drew himself up ferociously as he spoke) " he said 
 to me, ' Milord, on me dit que vous etes deux personnes, dans 
 la conversation rien de plus charmant : mais touchez aux 
 affaires ! eh, voila le lion Britannique,' " and his lordship 
 straightened his neck and opened his eyes and closed his lips
 
 172 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vi 
 
 as if he felt himself the British Lion and had just had his 
 whiskers pulled. This was in driving from Saltram to Mount 
 Edgcumbe. Driving back I was touched by a little bit of sad 
 poetry. We were crossing one of the Plymouth creeks, and saw 
 two small sails, one in deep shadow, and the other white with 
 the sun upon it. Lord Stratford just pointed them out to 
 my wife, with the words "Hope and disappointment;" he 
 spoke sadly, as if he had some real reason ; on the other 
 hand, he certainly had some cause for feeling satisfied. . . . 
 
 ' The negotiations were interrupted when the French war 
 in Italy was imminent and gave the French something to 
 think of. However, it was taken up again after the conclu- 
 sion of the war, and I was again sent to Paris to proceed with 
 the convention this time with M. de Chasseloup Laubat. 
 He was a talkative, quick, handy fellow, and we got through 
 the work rapidly and in a friendly way. The only hitch was 
 his great anxiety to get into this convention a special mention 
 of Nossibe and Mayotta, two places of which I had never 
 heard, but which turned out to be places in Madagascar, 1 
 where the French wanted to get a specific recognition of 
 their acquisitions. 
 
 ' The convention was some time after concluded, 
 
 as I had settled it ; I imagine, with scarcely an alteration.' 
 
 To Lady Rogers, 
 
 January 1858. 
 
 My dear Mother, A few lines written in a hurry to in- 
 form you of a new ' commissionership ' which has fallen on 
 my head (unpaid of course) I am now commissioner for 
 settling in conjunction with a French Commissioner the 
 regulations under which coolies may be taken from British 
 India to French colonies. 
 
 Wednesday evening I got a note from Labouchere say- 
 ing that he and Lord Clarendon had settled this mode of pro- 
 
 1 Two small islands off the north- was written supply more clearly the 
 west coast of Madagascar. Events motive of this insertion, 
 which have happened since the above
 
 1858 MISSION TO PARIS 173 
 
 ceeding ; 2 and yesterday evening I got a note from Lord C. 
 to Labouchere, forwarded for me to open (in his absence) 
 and act upon immediately, saying that M. de Persigny was quite 
 satisfied with that mode of proceeding, ' that if he had known 
 where to find Sir F. Rogers he would have called upon him 
 and made his acquaintance,' but, that not being so, he wished 
 Sir F. R. would call upon him at the French Embassy at 
 half-past two ' to-morrow,' i.e. to-day. To the French 
 Embassy I am accordingly bound ; and I suppose I shall be 
 introduced by M. de Persigny to my colleague and antagonist 
 in the negotiation. The French are, I believe, excessively 
 anxious not only to get the thing done, but to get it done 
 immediately. So I suppose I shall be spurred on, or dunned 
 furiously. At present I don't know my own position, and 
 not only go without a shadow of instruction of any sort but 
 without a distinct view as to what instructions I must or can 
 get. And (between ourselves) I am not likely to get much 
 from Labouchere, and am likely to be a kind of central point 
 to be battered by all the conflicting interests French, West 
 Indian, East Indian, Foreign Office, philanthropists, sugar- 
 manufacturers &c. so I look at my future with ' awe mixed 
 with jollity.' Mind, this is not to be talked about just yet 
 I wish diplomacy were not so wholly new to me. As to 
 knowledge of the subject, I am at least a one-eyed man among 
 the blind, I hope. 
 
 Ever affectionately, 
 
 F. R. 
 Happy New Year to you all. 
 
 Miss S. Rogers. 
 
 January 3, 1858. 
 
 My dear Sophy, You come in for the account of my 
 interview with M. de Persigny. At half-past two, of course, 
 I presented myself and was shown in ; he is a pleasant- 
 mannered man, much younger than I was prepared for, as I 
 fancy (or fancied) him an old Louis Philippe official, agree- 
 able-looking, and anxious to set to work. It soon appeared 
 
 2 Mr. Labouchere (afterwards Lord the Colonies, Lord Clarendon Foreign 
 Taunton) was Secretary of State for Secretary.
 
 174 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vi 
 
 that he intended to do all the work on his side himself, and 
 he was somewhat disconcerted at hearing that I had no in- 
 structions, till I told him that however I knew enough about 
 the matter to enter upon it, and that probably we might 
 facilitate matters by going over the ground. Accordingly we 
 started, he at once taking for the heads of the negotiation a 
 certain paper that I had concocted for the Foreign Office 
 while I was laid up with rheumatism. The paper, I think, 
 was pretty clear and complete, and as it was done off-hand 
 without papers I think I got credit for it (a mere enumeration 
 of regulations). I was able to throw off on the first point 
 with what he considered a great concession (at least I 
 volunteered that I personally thought it ought to be conceded), 
 and, as my ground was that the contrary course would even- 
 tually lead to heart-burnings between England and France, 
 that gave occasion to a little oration on his part on the 
 general desirableness of avoiding paltry points of collision 
 between two great nations. Then we went through the 
 points : one point he (as they say) ' tried on ' about which I 
 had thought and was prepared for him, then he at once gave 
 in (he never argued a single point, or for a moment, but 
 merely occupied himself in ascertaining what we would 
 or could give, generally assenting and noting quickly any 
 point that might be material in after-discussions). Then 
 on some provocation or other he made a speech, as if it were 
 to imbue me with the views with which the Foreign Office 
 ought to be indoctrinated (and, of course, had been) in the 
 general treatment of the question. We, the English, had had 
 our triumphs in 1815, and our enormous progress since had 
 given us the supremacy in this and that, commerce, &c. 
 Therefore we had that supremacy to lose and nothing to gain 
 by war. France, under a new dynasty, which wanted con- 
 solidating, also required peace till she was firm on her legs. 
 A liberal mode of dealing was the way to preserve peace. In 
 the matter of Bolgrad :< (here he could not remember the name 
 
 3 The Russian plenipotentiary at the the approach to the Danube. England 
 
 Conference of Paris claimed Bolgrad and Austria, wishing to keep the Rus- 
 
 on the River Yalpuk, a little north sian frontier away from the Danube, 
 
 of the Danube, and the Isle of Ser- stood out against this (though France 
 
 pents, which would have commanded did not) and eventually gained their
 
 1858 MISSION TO PARIS 175 
 
 of the place, and had to boggle and apologise for five minutes 
 in a way which interfered with the effect of the oration), the 
 Emperor was wrong (very confidential was it not?) quite 
 wrong ; he had given an offhand assent to the Russian pro- 
 position without seeing what depended on it. Then we, 
 the English, thought he was Russianising, which was not the 
 case, and he had to get out of the scrape as he could. In 
 fact, he frankly owned to Lord Palmerston that the whole was 
 his fault a blunder. But then a nation cannot go on time 
 after time confessing itself wrong, and it would be very un- 
 fortunate if a quarrel were to arise by requiring such a thing. 
 This is ambiguous and oracular. The sense is this. The 
 French Government have promised their colonies to revive the 
 slave trade (in substance), the English make such a row about 
 this that it may lead to war or something like it, unless the 
 dispute is evaded. The French Government is too far 
 pledged to give in visibly, whether wrong or right. But if 
 you will let us get emigrant labourers from India instead of 
 buying slaves in Africa, we will give up the African enter- 
 prise and tell our colonists that we have made a capital 
 bargain for them, and so we shall be out of the mess 
 altogether. 
 
 All this is sous-entendu, and, I suppose, was all said to me 
 in order to impress me with the feeling that I held the fate of 
 Europe in my hands and would imperil it if I did not some- 
 how or another come to an understanding about this same 
 emigration. And I must admit that this sort of humbug, 
 even though one sees through it, has a decided effect on the 
 temper with which one gets into the matter. 
 
 Then I raised a point on which I felt a future difficulty 
 was coming, sooner or later. He said then, for the first time, 
 that his Government had instructed him that the obvious 
 mode of getting over it was inadmissible. Then I explained 
 that something effective we must have. He agreed, and 
 then we concurred in a proposition, he admitting its propriety 
 (indeed, I think it was his own suggestion) but reserving it 
 
 point. The frontier between Russia clavia, and, of course, also the Isle of 
 and Turkey at that point followed the Serpents. This was settled early in 
 River Yalpuk, leaving Uolgracl to Mol- January 1857.
 
 1 76 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vi 
 
 for his Government. All that I said or did was, of course, so 
 reserved, as I told him I had no instructions. 
 
 However, he evidently considered (and he was not far 
 wrong, I think) that the affair was practically so far settled ; 
 and we made little rough notes of what we had agreed, he 
 taking a copy of mine, which, I suppose, he sent off to Paris. 
 At least he worked like a man whose mind was bent on 
 settling this particular question without an hour's more delay 
 than he could help. He tells Lord Clarendon the Emperor is 
 determined to have labour from one place or another, and 
 that at once. 
 
 He is not like any English worker that I have seen. 
 There is about him a quick promptitude in getting through 
 questions one by one, without forestalling or going back to 
 anything, which is unlike an English official, who is either a 
 clerk or a great man. He worked like a union of the two 
 more of the clerk, but having the authority to speak and settle 
 things (generally) off his own bat that a chief has. And yet 
 he worked like a man who was to give an account to a chief 
 of what he had done, and would be held accountable for 
 letting the matter he had in hand sleep or miss its way. I 
 should say perhaps more than anything else of him that he 
 was ' thoroughly alive.' It is too soon to say he was very 
 fair, else I should say that also. There, now you have a full, 
 true, and particular account of my introduction to diplomacy. 
 
 I must be off, so good-bye. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 F. R. 
 
 Of course all this is not to be talked of cela va sans dire. 
 
 To Rev. R. W. Church. 
 8 Park Street, Westminster: January 14, 1858. 
 My dear Church, I certainly wish very much that I 
 could have a talk with you, especially as I have come out in 
 a new shape. At present I am engaged in an ' English 
 Commission ' with M. de Persigny, a plan about Coolie 
 Emigration, which presents some considerable perplexities, 
 and, Dis quoniam propins contingo, have seen some little bits
 
 1858 MISSION TO PARIS 177 
 
 of fun which you would enjoy if I could talk them over with 
 you, but are hardly spicy enough to be potted in a letter. I 
 am in a somewhat absurd position, pretty much without 
 authority or instructions, but dealing with a subject of which 
 I certainly know more than anybody else, at the same time 
 hemmed round by superior authorities, who, little as they 
 know what the details and rights of the matter are, know 
 what they want and have traditional and incompatible views. 
 The French Government are, I imagine, determined to have 
 their way ; the Foreign Office determined that the question 
 should be settled ; Labouchere is torn about by divers in- 
 fluences which must, under all circumstances, prevent his 
 standing upright, but is subject to a Colonial Office influence 
 adverse to what the French (if they see their way as clearly 
 as I suppose they do) will insist upon. The India Board 4 
 have drawling, minute, obstructive ways, that will stop the 
 whole thing, I should think, if nobody runs over them. Then 
 the matter is one which, if it gets wind, will bring down on 
 poor Labouchere's head, in a state of fury, the West Indians, 
 or the humanitarians, or both. 
 
 I was greatly amused at the (as yet only) interview with 
 de Persigny he is very pleasant and, as somebody called him, 
 ' coulant] but different from any English chief that I have 
 seen. He unites with a certain amount of a chiefs authority 
 much more of a head clerk's mode of going rapidly and with 
 knowledge through the successive points of a case, never 
 anticipating what is coming or going back to what is past, 
 or showing ignorance or hesitation as to what he had and 
 what he had not power to conclude. But what struck me 
 very much was that he seemed to work (I cannot analyse my 
 reason further) as if he had a master in the cupboard watch- 
 ing him and seeing that he lost no point in anything. Also 
 I was greatly amused at his endeavours to make me imagine 
 by one or two set orations that the question at issue was one 
 on which it was of such deep importance that England and 
 France should not fall out (becoming withal confidential), 
 that no small difficulties should be allowed to interpose 
 themselves &c. &c. all this being peculiarly apposite or 
 
 4 The old Board of Control, now within a few months of its end. 
 
 N
 
 1 78 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vi 
 
 inapposite (as you choose to view it) to ray peculiar function, 
 which was that of framing details which he was likely to 
 dispute, on a matter in which I was supposed to be cognisant 
 of details. I should say that the thing was well done, except 
 that he did not make full allowances for my being a matter 
 of fact Englishman instead of a Frenchman of expansive 
 views. 
 
 To Lady Rogers. 
 
 January 20, 1858. 
 
 I have seen Persigny again (we talk English with a phrase 
 or two of French). He apparently knew that I had finished 
 my work and that he must wait the leisure of the Court of 
 Directors, but he sent for me because he wanted to tell me 
 what the Paris people objected to, and I was reassured to 
 find that he was with me and against his own Government. 
 It is rather amusing to see how each department wants to 
 keep itself clear of difficulties. The Minister of Marine, ' qui est 
 un peu partisan ' according to M. de Persigny, wants on behalf 
 of his colonies to make sure of a supply of coolies and so to 
 charge us with the collection, and blame us if we fail in doing 
 it. I say : ' We can't collect enough for ourselves ; and won't pro- 
 mise for you what we can't perform. If we do, you will cer- 
 tainly turn upon us and say we have not given you fair play. 
 Go and collect, if you can, for yourselves. It will keep us 
 better friends in the long run if when you fail you have 
 clearly no one to blame but yourselves.' This last sentence 
 (being clearly true) touches the Ambassador who will be 
 troubled to compose French and English quarrels, just as the 
 Minister of Marine will be troubled to allay Colonial 
 complaints, and so I may fairly hope the Ambassador is in 
 earnest (as I think he is) when he professes himself to side 
 with me. He was very friendly and seemed as if he did not 
 wish to get rid of me. But when I got up to go away he 
 perched himself like a little bird (he is more like a cock robin 
 than I thought him at first) on the top of his fender with his 
 back against the chimney-piece and went on discoursing 
 about our business. I was much amused at one point which I 
 tried to make. The French pack their emigrants and ships twice 
 as close as we do, and yet they have had very good passages.
 
 1858 MISSION TO PARIS 179 
 
 Of course they object to imposing on themselves our strict 
 law, and I want to come to some compromise, so I tried to 
 find what would pacify them, and suggested 50 cubical feet 
 par personne. This posed old Persigny, who wanted to know 
 what it meant ; and betook himself in a vague perplexed 
 way, like a puzzled linen-draper, to a measuring tape which 
 he began to pull out, and measure distances in the air as if 
 that would help him. So I explained that 50 cubical feet 
 was 6 feet long i^ feet broad and 5^ feet high, or, to make 
 the matter more intelligible, if he would imagine the whole 
 ground pretty well covered with human beings lying at full 
 length, and 5^ feet of height above them, that would be the 
 thing ' and,' I added, ' I don't think you can well give a man 
 less than that? I shall not easily forget the mixture of 
 disgust and astonishment and amusement with which he 
 burst out, ' Sacre-Dieu ! non ! they will all be sick ' (or rather 
 ' seek ') ' too,' on which I began to repent me of having given in 
 so much, and tried to retrieve a point or two, with what 
 success remains to be seen. 
 
 To Lady Rogers. 
 
 February 2, 1858. 
 
 I have not written to you my last communications with 
 Persigny. On the 2 ist I received notice that the Court of 
 Directors 5 had approved my articles, and so I took them 
 off at once to him, and on the 23rd he despatched them in a 
 modified shape (in some respects) to his Government, giving 
 me warning of one or two objections, which (as I could not 
 yield to them myself) the Government would raise. 
 
 Since that time I have heard no more of him I dare say 
 that the exchange of shots, which must have taken place 
 about the ' attentat ' on the Emperor, does not dispose them 
 to proceed very cheerfully or zealously in the negotiations. 
 
 5 The powers of the East India of representations from the French 
 
 Company lasted till June of that year. Government. The Bill was right and 
 
 " Orsini's attempt at assassination desirable, but unfortunately the English 
 
 on January 14. This was followed by nation had lost its temper over some 
 
 Lord Palmerston's 'Conspiracy to stupid inflammatory speeches of officers 
 
 Murder Bill,' drawn up in consequence in the French Army, who talked about
 
 x8o LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vi 
 
 He was personally very civil and easy throughout, though 
 keen in working for what he considered his Government 
 would object to. I have no doubt I shall have a lot of objec- 
 tions to meet when it comes back. 
 
 He read me a long list of the ' Minister of Marine's ' 
 objections to what I may call my requirement, that the 
 French should collect emigrants for themselves instead of 
 throwing it on the British Government, and of his own reply 
 which was characteristic and amusing. The civil deference 
 with which the objections of the ' Marine ' were magnified 
 and evaded was very French ; and an elaborate argument 
 that the cordial and bona fide co-operation of the English 
 Government might be counted upon because the success 
 of the scheme was the only way in which Lord Palmer- 
 ston could escape from allowing the French emigration 
 from Africa and so incurring the pressure of public opinion, 
 ' which is so susceptible a cet cgard' and of ' la Societi Biblique ' 
 (which was made to figure as a great political power), was 
 wonderfully characteristic of a French view of English 
 manners. 
 
 I tried to say something civil about the attack on Louis 
 Napoleon ; but did not make much of it, and his mode of 
 dealing with my little sentiment, a kind of significant shake 
 of the hand at parting, without words, was explained when I 
 saw afterwards in the papers what he had been saying to the 
 Lord Mayor the same or previous day. 
 
 To the Rev. R. W. Church. 
 
 February 20, 1858. 
 
 My dear Church, My French negotiations have come to 
 a fix. After all the drawing up of details and canvassing 
 and inquiring, the French Government require a preliminary 
 which according to my views is absolutely inadmissible, 
 and so the matter stands Persigny pledged to my view, and 
 professing much anxiety to get over the people in Paris 
 (where he now is), but the ' Ministre de Marine,' who I 
 
 ' pursuing the assassins to their strong- rejected, really on the absurd theory 
 hold ' [England] ; so the Bill was that it was truckling to the French.
 
 1858 MISSION TO PARIS 181 
 
 imagine sees more clearly the actual view of the case, stoutly 
 opposed to concession unless we can guarantee them what 
 they want to get which we can't do. Persigny gets more 
 insignificant as I look closely at him, but very friendly and 
 amusing. He read me a good many of the Paris comments on 
 my articles (some grossly unreasonable) and observed on the 
 spirit of mistrust, especially on some which concerned particular 
 proposals of ' Sire Rogers ' ' apparemment on vous croit un 
 Ogre par-la ' told me how the Emperor and he had to com- 
 bat all these natural jealousies in France, just as English 
 Ministers had in England, and how he would get at the 
 man in Paris who had drawn the papers, ' the Sire Frederic 
 Rogers of Paris,' and see whether he could not come round 
 him. I wish you could have seen him, sometimes perched 
 on the top of his fender, with his shoulder-blades just 
 leaning against his chimney-piece, and extending his arm 
 like a man who was extending protection to all French 
 subjects in all parts of the globe, to give a weight to a 
 peroration ; of course, all this was especially confidential. I 
 should think in every point of view it must all come to an end 
 now. I don't half like, under present circumstances, calling 
 on his locum tenens. 
 
 Pam has got, in a degree, his deserts. There are lots of 
 things (as I think) to be said for any one else in his situation, 
 but none for him. He has been making capital of the un- 
 reasonable arrogance of the English, and passed himself off 
 as the man who was to make all the world submit to it, and 
 upset or outbid anybody who was for reasonable dealing, and 
 now he has to be reasonable, or more, to foreign powers and 
 make a case against England. 
 
 I think if I had been the Opposition I would have con- 
 tented myself with protesting in speecJies against the omission 
 to answer Walewski, without coming to a vote on it. It is a 
 mere censure without any practical object ; and according to 
 the old principle you should not censure (by vote of the 
 House of Commons) unless you can replace a Ministry, which 
 I apprehend the Opposition cannot. Also I confess I dislike 
 inexpressibly House of Commons meddlings in foreign 
 negotiations.
 
 1 82 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vi 
 
 However, I can't deny a satisfaction for the moment in 
 
 the result. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS. 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 8 Park Street : November 8, 1858. 
 
 I have been so busy that I forget whether I have told you 
 about Gladstone's mission, not that I have much to say, 
 except that I have come across him and Sir Edward a little, 
 from having to draw up his commission. 7 It was very absurd 
 to see them talking it over, Gladstone's clear dark eye and 
 serious face and ponderous forehead and calm manner was 
 such a contrast with Sir E.'s lean, narrow face, and hurried 
 theatrical, conscious kind of ways. Of course, my affair was 
 merely with form and language, knowing, in fact, nothing of 
 the substance of what was being done, but people are cha- 
 racteristic even in their way of treating that. They both 
 originally wanted CGladstone, I suppose, principally) to give 
 the mission a diplomatic character, the lonians being, under 
 the treaty of Paris, a ' free and independent State ' under 
 our ' protection.' But that I had to fight against, and, indeed, 
 on looking into the matter, it would have been as absurd as a 
 matter of form as it plainly would be as a matter of substance. 
 
 I have seen a good deal of Lord Carnarvon about that 
 and other matters. He is very friendly and extra confi- 
 dential, and I think will have not a bad judgment when he 
 gets a little more to know his ground and have confidence in 
 himself. Both he and Sir Edward work very hard, Sir E. 
 writes perfect volumes by way of minutes, and then tells me 
 that he learnt two great maxims in life, one to write as little 
 as possible and the other to say as little as possible. 8 
 
 However, I must get to work ; so good-bye. 
 
 Ever yours, 
 
 F. R. 
 
 7 Mr. Gladstone was sent as special 8 Sir Edward Bulwer Lytton (the 
 
 High Commissioner to the Ionian first Lord Lytton) was Secretary of 
 
 Islands to inquire into the complaints State for the Colonies ; Lord Carnarvon 
 
 which the people of those islands made was Parliamentary Under Secretary for 
 
 regarding the Protectorate of Great the Colonies. 
 Britain.
 
 1858 MISSION TO PARIS 183 
 
 To Lady Rogers. 
 
 November 9, 1858. 
 
 My dear Mother, I forget how much I told you about 
 Gladstone. I have had to do the technical part drawing his 
 commission and writing his introductory letter. He and Sir 
 Edward Lytton are obviously Philhellenes, and, I should say, 
 disposed to think that we have treated the lonians rather arbi- 
 trarily. This I take to be true ; but on the other hand I imagine 
 that it is difficult to treat such a pack of scamps otherwise. 
 
 In 1815 we acknowledged them as a ' single, free, and inde- 
 pendent republic, under a protection,' and the King engaged 
 to employ peculiar solicitude in looking after their internal 
 organisation and administration ; then we or our Lord High 
 Commissioner required them to pass a constitutional law, 
 which, under the forms of a republic, really gave our Lord 
 High Commissioner despotic power, and this power he 
 exercised until lately when Lords Grey and Seaton 9 gave 
 them a real voice in their government. This they have used 
 to job astoundingly and rebel occasionally. We, on the 
 other hand, have shot the rebels, and resumed somewhat of 
 our despotic sway. 
 
 The people all, I imagine, hate us, and wish for union with 
 Greece ; but a good many, apparently, in Corfu think that 
 English despotism is better than English or Ionian anarchy, 
 and would be satisfied to get back quietly to the old strong 
 rule. Meanwhile all our own knowledge respecting the state 
 of feeling &c. in the islands comes either from what we see 
 of the noisy democrats, who are probably a bad set, or what 
 we are told by our own toadies, who are likely enough to be 
 worse. So the appointment of an able and unprejudiced 
 Commission of Inquiry is a likely thing enough to be 
 valuable. 
 
 Sir Edward and Gladstone wanted to make the mission 
 a diplomatic one Envoy as well as Commissions and Sir 
 E. L. made a ridiculous speech, sawing his arm up and 
 down as if I was the House of Commons, and holding 
 
 9 Lord Seaton as Lord High Commissioner, Lord Grey as Secretary for the 
 Colonies in 1848.
 
 1 84 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vi 
 
 forth about the ' Statesman ' whom he would wish, if he could 
 (Gladstone was not avowed), to procure for the work. But 
 on examination it was pretty clearly ascertained that this 
 could not be, and it was accordingly given up Then I had 
 to draw the Commission, and was brought rather pleasantly 
 into council with Gladstone and Sir Edward (it was pretty 
 clear who was the better man) on the final alterations. 
 
 As to the coolie business, I supposed it to be stirring 
 because the Foreign Office came to me to look up some old 
 papers. But Louis Napoleon's manifesto * was quite a surprise. 
 I don't know whether or not they will make use of me I 
 don't think that the French would desire me. Persigny 
 might y but he is out, and the Paris people look on me as a 
 perfect enemy. I think our people would wish to use me if 
 they were sure I would not be troublesome and thwart the 
 project. I don't know that there is any reason for making 
 any further mystery about my having been engaged with 
 Persigny in the negotiations to which his Imperial Majesty 
 alludes. I have done nothing about it except to send in to 
 Lord Carnarvon one or two outstanding letters which ought 
 to be in the hands of any one who takes charge of the matter, 
 simply that he may know that he has all that has passed, 
 and to enter a little warning on one point which wants 
 reconsidering. 
 
 I was glad to see old , who, with his white moustachios 
 
 and stupendous hunched-up shoulders, looks like one of the 
 savage smelters in Retsch's ' Fridolin,' putting the unjust 
 steward into the fire. 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 Nov. 22, 1858. 
 
 My dear Kate, I write to say that I find on my table a 
 letter from the Colonial Office inclosing one from Lord 
 Malmesbury to Sir E. B. Lytton, saying that the French 
 
 1 The Emperor, in a letter to Prince in disguise, I will not allow it on any 
 
 Napoleon on October 30, said that he conditions ; ' and he desired that his 
 
 would no longer permit negro labourers minister should try to obtain Indian 
 
 to be taken from the African coast : ' If coolies as free labourers, 
 their enrolment is simply the slave-trade
 
 1858 MISSION TO PARIS 185 
 
 Government have requested ' the presence and assistance of Sir 
 F. Rogers ' in Paris as soon as possible, that he, Lord M., 
 has spoken to Lords Derby and Stanley, who consent, and that 
 he would be much obliged to Sir E. L. ' to allow and direct 
 Sir F. R. to call at the Foreign Office at 4.30 ' to-day. 
 
 Sir E. L.'s private secretary incloses it, writes that Sir E. 
 B. L. has answered that I cannot be spared from here until 
 the end of the week. I am afraid I may hardly be able to 
 write after I have been at the F. O. there probably will then 
 be much to say. So I finish off at once. 
 
 Ever yours, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS. 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 Nov. 25, 1858. 
 
 My dear Kate, A line only to say that I have just seen 
 Lord Malmesbury, who wished me to go off this week, and 
 had partly promised that I would. So I have been to Sir 
 Edward, and got leave to be off on Friday. My instructions, 
 I suppose, are simply to present myself to Lord Cowley that 
 is all he tells me to do. 
 
 The object professed is to give all possible information to 
 a Commission, at the head of which is my old friend Persigny. 
 
 Ever affectionately, 
 
 F. R. 
 
 To Lady Rogers. 
 
 Chateau de Chantilly : Nov. 2"8, 1858. 
 
 My dear Mother, G. will probably send you on my first 
 letter, so I shall not repeat, except to say that I found in getting 
 to Paris that Lord Cowley was then with the Emperor at 
 Compiegne, and was living at Chantilly (the Ambassade in 
 Paris being under repair), and Lord Chelsea, whom I saw, 
 told me I could not do better than go down and spend the 
 Sunday with him there. Accordingly I got down by an 
 evening train in time for dinner, and, as Lord C. was not to be 
 home till late (12 o'clock at night), had dinner and a pleasant 
 evening with Lady Cowley, two of her daughters, and a 
 governess Lady Cowley very hospitable and friendly. This
 
 1 86 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vi 
 
 evening I have seen Lord Cowley, who is too busy to have 
 anything to say to me till the morning, when we can talk 
 over our own affairs ; meanwhile I have been looking a little 
 over the premises, and am now waiting for a summons to 
 take a lionising walk with Lady Cowley. 
 
 The Chateau was the hunting palace of the great Conde, 
 but the larger and more magnificent part was destroyed in 
 the Revolution, leaving a kind of appendage called the 
 ' capitainerie ' (in the style of the Tuileries), which is the 
 present chateau. Conde's stables (holding 170 horses) 
 remain. And the whole plan certainly has a grand look 
 of Louis Quatorze magnificence remaining. The inside 
 is said to have been fitted by Watteau, and very beautiful 
 in its way ; the room in which I am writing (my bedroom) is 
 a little circular room, about twenty feet across, with all sorts 
 of painted ceiling and gilt adornments, with alternations of 
 painted wood and gold pilasters and shawl-like hangings, 
 medallions, &c. ; and looking out in front on a large piece of 
 artificial water, which wanders about the house as if it might 
 once have been a moat, with some idea of defence ; but had 
 afterwards been enlarged and Louis Quatorzified. The base- 
 ment story, or, as they call it, ' the foundation,' of the old 
 palace remains, and there is a kind of faint similarity to a 
 fortified house in the outline both of it and the water, in 
 which I can contrive to imagine that the taste of the great 
 general may be visible. The terraces are very grand indeed, 
 smaller than those of the Crystal Palace, but more beautiful, 
 and evidently the real tiling, out of which the Crystal 
 Palace terraces are blown out. It is on a flat, so there is no 
 view, except just upon the grounds, which seem to be 
 according to the French park fashion avenues, vistas, &c. 
 The whole is backed by the Forest of Chantilly, of which one 
 just sees the edge, looking like a belt. It went from Conde 
 to the Due de Bourbon, then to the Due d'Aumale, and then, 
 on the forced sale of the Orleans property, was bought by 
 Messrs. Coutts, it is said, for the Orleans family. 
 
 Back again from my walk. The stables are certainly a 
 sight more like a cathedral than anything else, if one could 
 imagine a cathedral strictly a la Louis Quatorze they
 
 1858 MISSION TO PARIS 187 
 
 certainly impress on one's mind a notion of the way in which 
 the great princes of the blood did things then, also relics of 
 the old festive way of going on ; a group of would-be 
 picturesque cottages, including a mill, where the gentlemen 
 and ladies used to picnic in the dress of Dresden china millers 
 and shepherdesses, and a labyrinth, in the centre of which 
 luncheon for two was laid every day ; both the cottages (the 
 hameau} and labyrinth are in decay. 
 
 Watteau seems to have been a hanger-on to the Conde 
 clique of his day, and in one of the rooms there is a caricature 
 of Louis Quatorze and Madame Pompadour as monkeys. 
 (Conde was always in opposition.) 
 
 The village is a queer place largely inhabited by a 
 population of English jockeys. In front of their windows is 
 the great race-course of France, where there are races four or 
 five times a year (the principal one being called 'the Derby') 
 and constant training ; and, of course, English trainers and 
 jockeys are in request, and a set of them have fairly naturalised 
 themselves here. I find my room is an imposture, being fitted 
 up, not ' siecle de Louis XV.' as I supposed, but only by the 
 Due d'Aumale. However, be that as it may, it is a gorgeous 
 little affair ; I ought to have seen that it was too fresh for an 
 antiquity. Lord C. at luncheon rather short and grumpy 
 I hope nothing has gone wrong. I am glad to hear from him 
 that they have seized the fellow Guernsey that stole the 
 paper from the Colonial Office. The subs, were rather in a 
 state of indignation at its not having been done before. He 
 was to have been off to the United States on Friday or Satur- 
 day, and I suppose that made them feel that it must be done. 
 
 To Lady Rogers (Lady BlachforcT). 
 
 Hotel du Louvre : November 29, 1858. 
 
 Half-past seven P.M., Hotel du Louvre, dinner just 
 finished, dressing-gown, slippers, wood fire, and a long 
 evening. . . I had a very pleasant time at Chantilly. The 
 place is very pretty and full of character, and Lady Cowley 
 fond of showing it off at least, apparently so. On Sunday 
 I was agreeably surprised to find that they had a chaplain
 
 1 88 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vi 
 
 and two services for the benefit of themselves and the colony 
 of English jockeys and trainers who have been collected at 
 Chantilly, leaving time for a goodish walk between services 
 (along the old waterworks of Conde and Lenotre) and odds 
 and ends of time enough to read the Emperor's ' Idees 
 Napoleoniennes ' an interesting book under the circum- 
 stances, with a good many striking thoughts in it, and a good 
 deal of useless effort to fight against facts. The idea running 
 through it is that the Empire was in Napoleon's view the 
 only practicable school by which the French could be 
 educated into freedom. . . . 
 
 Business was soon despatched ; in fact, I was merely in 
 the first instance to answer questions, though in so doing we 
 may probably work some way towards an understanding. I 
 understand that Prince Napoleon 2 is to do the business 
 himself (like Persigny), and, I suppose, at Persigny's sugges- 
 tion desired that I personally should be sent over. But 
 there seems to be a hitch of etiquette. Walewski protests 
 against any communication between England and France in 
 Paris except through him. But nobody wants him, the 
 particular matter not being, I suppose, his affair : so, as a 
 compromise, he insists that I should see him before I see 
 Prince Napoleon, but as he is not forthcoming in Paris till 
 Wednesday I am idle to-morrow ; and Lord C. has written 
 to the father of his private secretary, who is a famous lioniser 
 of Paris, to give me a helping hand in that way. I expect to 
 hear from him. On Wednesday Lord C. is coming to Paris, 
 and will take me to Walewski ; after that I shall, I suppose, 
 be free for the Prince, and business will begin. It will 
 probably last two or three days, so that I am not likely to 
 get away this week, and Lord C. says that if it comes to 
 negotiation I shall be wanted again. Lord Cowley is a 
 mixture sometimes dry and silent almost to forbiddingness, 
 and sometimes very communicative, and cordially communi- 
 cative, only of what he wishes to be known and repeated, but 
 with the appearance of talking freely and giving his opinion. 
 Of course, the Embassy view of everything is in relation to 
 its own work. ' Everything that tends to blow the coals 
 
 - Prince Napoleon (' Plon-Plon ') was Minister for the Colonies.
 
 1858 MISSION TO PARIS 189 
 
 between England and France is detestable. Montalembert 
 is a trumpery fellow, absolutist at heart, and merely set on 
 notoriety. The Government have most imprudently fallen 
 into a trap and given him his wish. Nobody in Paris cares 
 twopence about him, his book, or his prosecution.' 3 Lord C. 
 seemed to think that the French had very little confidence in 
 any of the old Louis-Philippist school of statesmen, and said 
 that the Emperor had said to him more than once that if he 
 could find any Minister in whom France could have real con- 
 fidence he would make any sacrifice to get his services. The 
 first part seems likely enough, for I suppose that all the world 
 knows Thiers to be a regular scamp, and Guizot, though 
 honest himself, to have been a regular fountain of corruption 
 to others. Au reste, ' any sacrifice' is a loose way of speaking 
 that may mean anything you choose, but I can easily imagine 
 that the Emperor hands the government of the country over 
 to unknown men who are staunch friends of his own, partly 
 because he believes the old school to be in sober truth not a 
 bit more trustworthy, and therefore not worth the sacrifice 
 which he would have to make for them. 
 
 This morning (Monday) I left Chantilly, got here between 
 two and three, and what with a call at the Embassy, shaking 
 into shape at the Hotel, and luncheon, did not manage to get 
 more than a walk along the Quais before dark. 
 
 No use for the cocked hat, but I suppose it was safe to 
 bring it. 
 
 To Lady Rogers (Lady Blachford}. 
 
 Paris : December 3. 
 
 As far as I am concerned this week is simply lost. 
 I imagine there is ill feeling between Walewski and Prince 
 Napoleon, and W. is affronted at having the matter pass over 
 his head. He has first interposed generally, next he has ap- 
 pointed Lord Cowley to bring me before him on Wednesday 
 (yesterday), then to-day (Thursday), and now he professes to 
 
 3 Montalembert was prosecuted the French Empire. The judges sen- 
 
 ( November 25, 1858) for having pub- tenced him to a fine of 6,000 francs and 
 
 lished the pamphlet Un Debat surFInde, six months' imprisonment; but the 
 
 in which he contrasted English liberty Emperor gave a free pardon, 
 with the system of government under
 
 1 9 o LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vi 
 
 be detained with the Emperor at Cornpiegne till Saturday 
 and pushes off my interview till Monday. Lord Chelsea says 
 this is the kind of thing he does. Meanwhile, I suppose, the 
 Colonial Office will growl. Luckily I left a clear table, except 
 what I have with me, and I hope nothing is accumulating. I 
 am not really wanted. . . . December^ All different. We really 
 are of such importance that we shall have our heads turned. 
 
 ' S. A. I. le Prince Napoleon ayant appris que Sir F. Rogers 
 etait arrive a Paris, le Prince desire vivement qu'il soit entendu 
 aujourd'hui meme' (being about 4 P.M. already) ' par la commis- 
 sion d'enquete sur 1'immigration. La Commission se rassemble 
 a cet effet ce soir au Palais Royal. Si Sir F. R. veut bien 
 s'y presenter a neuf heures du soir, il sera re^u par le Prince et 
 introduit a la Commission. L'entree au Palais Royal est Peri- 
 style Montpensier. Des ordres sont donnes a 1'huissier. Dans 
 le cas oil Sir F. R. serait dans 1'impossibilit^ de repondre 
 aujourd'hui au vceu de la Commission, le Prince desire vive- 
 ment en etre informe, soit directement, soit par 1'intermediaire 
 du Commandant Ferri Pisani, son aide-de-camp, Secretaire 
 de la Commission, demeurant au Palais Royal. 
 
 C. FERRI PISANI. 
 
 < Paris &c. &c.' 
 
 So you see in a few hours I shall be fairly landed. I 
 intended to have kept the grand letter (addressed to Lord 
 Cowley), but as Lord C. wants it back again as his protection 
 against Walewski, you see I waste time in copying it. I went to 
 Ferri Pisani with Lord Chelsea, and having ascertained first rny 
 way, secondly, how I am to address the Prince (who is to be 
 my questioner), I am now waiting for first my dinner and next 
 neuf heures. 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 Paris : December 5, 1858. 
 
 My letter was broken off by a letter from the Embassy 
 inclosing one to Lord Cowley (I suppose) from the Prince's 
 aide-de-camp .... appointing 9 o'clock when I should be 
 received by the Prince and introduced to the Commission. 
 Well, of course, off I went, was shown into a magnificent 
 room at the ' Ministere d'Algerie ' into which came the Prince
 
 1858 MISSION TO PARIS 191 
 
 (short, stout, intelligent-looking and very like his uncle) and 
 Persigny. The Prince received me courteously and Persigny 
 cordially, and after a few words took me into the next room, 
 a large, long, handsome room, with a large, long table with 
 about twenty Frenchmen, sage-looking and solemn. The 
 Prince took his seat on the centre of one long side, with 
 Persigny on his right, and put me opposite to him and began 
 his questions I tremble for my French and still tremble at 
 the recollection of it but there I was with the Prince upon 
 me in the first instance and, to say the truth, as cool as a 
 cucumber. ' Nous causerons ensemble,' was the way he put 
 it, and the notion was throughout of giving it a friendly con- 
 versational character. Well, before long, others began to 
 strike in with their questions, one or two who really wanted 
 information, and some who wanted to show off themselves 
 one in particular, although he had got up the question of 
 Mauritius very well. Then arose larger questions of general 
 immigration policy views of the British Government and so 
 on reasons pro and con for African emigration, and little 
 half-impatient discussions between the Prince and members 
 of the Commission, I being the mark at which every one who 
 wanted to make his point fired his first arrow. ' Si Monseigneur 
 me permettra, je ferai une question a Sir Rogers,' or 'je 
 rappellerai a M. Rogers une question a laquelle il a deja 
 repondu, mais qui me parait demander quelque developpe- 
 ment,' and so on. I got sometimes horribly confused in my 
 French, and then they told me to speak English. Many of 
 them understood it, and the Prince, I think, well. This lasted 
 for about an hour and a quarter, when the Prince rose and led 
 the way into the room in which he had received me, Persigny 
 half followed, expressing a hope that I was authorised to 
 negotiate, but then falling back motioned me to follow alone. 
 Then the Prince repeated that he wished very much I would 
 get authority to begin negotiations at once that we might 
 despatch it all in a fortnight if the matter were really pressed 
 on, and after a little talking in this strain shook hands very 
 courteously ; afterwards I came back to ask whether I should 
 be of any further use at present, as giving more information, 
 explaining that 1 had work to do in London. He told me,
 
 i 9 2 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vi 
 
 no, that they had got my ' autorit6 ' for the points on which 
 they wanted it (so that now I might run back at once, but 
 that Lord C. is back at Chantilly, and I must, I suppose, get 
 his leave (I wrote to him the result of the interview). Then 
 with another rather pointed handshaking, we each went our 
 way, he back to the Commission, I out as I came. 
 
 I would give two and sixpence to know that I had not 
 grossly exposed myself: there was a calm courtesy about their 
 mode of dealing with my flounderings in French which is 
 alarming to look back upon though it was particularly re- 
 assuring while the process was going on. 
 
 The one point which keeps me is that I was appointed 
 for Walewski on Tuesday, and when you miss an appoint- 
 ment with a somewhat unwilling appointer you have a chance 
 of messing the whole affair. So I half incline to run down 
 myself to-day to Chantilly, and find out what will be the best 
 way of managing. I ought to have a few days in London 
 before coming back to take up the negotiation, else the C. O. 
 will be grumbling. 
 
 To Lady Rogers. 
 
 H. de Veuillemont : December 17, 1858. 
 
 As you did not have my last great interview you shall 
 have this a more nervous one than the other. I was duly 
 informed, as I told you, by Lord Cowley that the Prince and 
 Benedetti were to take me in hand. In the course of the day 
 I got two notes, one from a M. Belling, the Chef de Cabinet 
 as it is called, to Walewski ; another (provoked by a note of 
 mine) from Ferri Pisani telling me to go to the Prince's private 
 residence, 18 Avenue Montaigne, at 9 P.M., which seems to 
 be his time for doing this kind of things. Well, away I went, 
 but first, like a goose, thought it was Rue Montaigne, and got 
 set down at a most ill-looking and shabby, dirty porte cochere, 
 then, like a double goose, not seeing instantly that I had 
 somehow gone wrong, and being a few minutes too soon, sent 
 away my voiturc and walked about till 9 o'clock. Well, when 
 9 o'clock came I rang at the bell and got into a still dirtier 
 yard, with nobody but an old woman, from whom I ascer- 
 tained my mistake, and had explained to me that I was to
 
 1858 MISSION TO PARIS 193 
 
 ' traverser les Champs-Elysees ' and so on ; so off I posted, not 
 knowing really my way, being in the dark and horribly dis- 
 gusted at the notion of being too late. Again I went wrong, 
 but at last, with many askings (not being able to read numbers), 
 got safe to the house an hotel standing alone, with a sweep in 
 front. There I found to my great satisfaction that the Prince 
 was still at a Ministerial dinner, and was shown into a small 
 room, where a big, yellow-haired and bearded, round-faced, tall, 
 broad, black-coated man came to divert me, a kind of major- 
 domo or master of the ceremonies he seemed to be. So we 
 talked of London and Paris, fogs &c., till we heard the Prince 
 had come. Then I was shown into a library tea table and tea- 
 urn hissing, Benedetti requesting to be introduced, study table 
 with three ominous-looking sheets of foolscap and blotting 
 paper, laid out, and with a little complimenting, got to work. 
 Well, we went over the whole ground and got matters pretty 
 much to the shape in which they were left with Persigny 
 that is to say, we see the future points of battle. The matter 
 is to be brought into a more definite shape, and then we are 
 to be at it again on Wednesday. These proceedings seem to 
 be rather like a table d'hote dinner at the Hotel du Louvre. 
 We get through the courses fast enough when they come, but 
 there is an enormous pause between them ; I am not sure, 
 however, that it is more than necessary, seeing that every- 
 thing has to be well considered and by divers people probably. 
 Meantime this looks long ; on Wednesday we may come to 
 some conclusion (or not), on Thursday I shall write (I suppose) 
 referring the points of difference home ; these will have to be 
 considered by Lords Malmesbury and Stanley and perhaps 
 Sir E. Lytton and their respective advisers. They must 
 agree on something and send it back then a fresh touch of 
 conference here then a fresh reference home which perhaps 
 I may take home myself in person. This seems the least that 
 can happen. The interview was curious. The Prince, I should 
 think, affected a good deal of his uncle's ways ; he is loud and 
 declamatory, disposed to bear down opposition, but (to me) 
 very civil, and not indisposed to infuse a touch of satire into 
 his declamation ; quick in seeing things, but not always 
 catching a fine point. Benedetti, on the contrary, is quite
 
 194 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vi 
 
 courteous and insinuating and would make you suppose that 
 you were wholly agreed in substance, and only differed as to 
 the position of phrases and turns of expression never run 
 away with by any of the Prince's misunderstandings and quietly 
 keeping all straight and warding off fights about nothing. At 
 the same time both the one and the other gave me very dis- 
 tinctly indeed the impression that it was necessary to look 
 sharp, and very hard work it was. When you have a man 
 that talks rather loud and long in English you have a great 
 advantage, because, while he is battering you, you can give 
 him a half attention and compose your own answer and study 
 your position. But when he is talking French your (or at 
 least my) whole attention is necessary to be sure that you 
 understand him, and so all that is said has to be said (in 
 fact) much more off-hand. Also you have to consider when 
 you speak, not only what you ought to say but what you can 
 say and how ; all which, when it is really necessary, if you can 
 help it, not to make a false step, gives one a kind of feeling of 
 being hurried through all the different subjects which arise 
 and are despatched, so that really I hardly felt that I had 
 recovered my breath till I had slept upon it. It was like 
 having a battle with two dogs, one great open-mouthed 
 barking fellow, who was making all sorts of noise and demon- 
 strations in front, while an extremely quiet bull terrier was 
 very composedly walking round you and about your legs with 
 evidently the deepest interest in your calves, but, withal, the 
 greatest propriety of demeanour. 
 
 However, we were all very civil, and after about two 
 hours of it (which carried the matter as far as it could be 
 carried at present) I was dismissed, leaving them (I suppose) 
 to talk it over by themselves, and Benedetti (as he declared) 
 to read and note twenty-five despatches. I got home about 
 a quarter to twelve o'clock, and having only had a cup of tea 
 at the expense of His Imperial Highness had a good com- 
 fortable talk and tea with Edward and went to bed. 
 
 I can't say I like the work altogether. It is interesting 
 but an unpleasantly anxious interest. It is very unpleasant 
 to deal with people who you feel want to trip you up, and 
 understand their work that is, the method of proceeding
 
 1858 MISSION TO PARIS 195 
 
 better than you do, and very unpleasant to feel what tyranny 
 and loss of life may be inflicted on thousands of people by a 
 false step. I get rather nervous and almost shaky when I 
 think of this part of the matter. But even little meddlings 
 of this kind help one to understand historical people. 1 
 think I feel a little how Roman and Venetian ambassadors 
 must have felt in the presence of great men. When you 
 really come to work, it is astonishing how the difference of 
 personal rank vanishes in the feeling that whatever you may 
 be, there is a big nation behind you. 
 
 To the Rev. R. W. Church. 
 
 Paris, Hotel Veuillemont : December 26, 1858. 
 On Thursday I got an invitation to dine on Christmas Day 
 with His Imperial Highness. His hotel is an extremely hand- 
 some Villa rather Pompeian in style; consistently classical, with 
 the necessary modifications to make it Parisian. The din- 
 ner was very choice, rooms and lighting splendid, and the 
 party made up, half of grand official-looking gentlemen, and 
 half of Algerian officers (one being General McMahon, the 
 man who stormed the Malakhoff, and is now military com- 
 mandant of Algeria) ; of the rest I found out nothing, except 
 my old friend Benedetti, and a young Prince of Schleswig- 
 Holstein, who is on the wide world here, and who turned out 
 or rather whom I knew to be an old friend of James and 
 Charlotte Colvile's at Calcutta. It was pleasant to see the 
 style of such a dinner (to say nothing of eating a variety of 
 remarkably good things) : the rising from dinner instantly on 
 finishing, and proceeding to the very handsome drawing- 
 room where the whole party instantly set to work on their 
 cigars, the Algerians walking up and down the room in 
 twos as if it was a guard-house or the deck of a steamer, was 
 a new style of thing. But otherwise except when the Prince or 
 Benedetti took me in hand on our business there was nobody 
 to talk to except my little Prince, who introduced himself. To 
 say the truth, I think the Frenchmen might have been a little 
 more civil. I had entirely to start the conversation, almost 
 to force it even to my neighbours at dinner. There was no
 
 196 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vi 
 
 species I will not say of effort to make the foreigner at home, not 
 even of inclination to meet him half way. If it had happened 
 in England I should just have called it English mauvaise Jionte, 
 and I really half think some of it may have been so ; at least, 
 there was about one or two of the soldiers a great want of that 
 ready prompt look that one associates with a Frenchman, 
 almost the manner of men who were not quite sure that they 
 were in their place ; perhaps they only felt that they were not 
 quite the men to do the honours of the Prince's drawing- 
 room ; anyhow I wish they had been a little more agreeable. 
 I had a longish talk on business in the course of the 
 evening with the Prince, his secretary and Benedetti, with a 
 certain amount of general talk. The Prince professes himself a 
 Radical, ' plusqu'un radical ' in matters of free trade, but I 
 suppose unable as yet to carry out his views ; an admirer of 
 Bright, ' who in a year or two may be Minister, qui sait ? ' I 
 should think he would have a good deal of pleasure in over- 
 coming opposition and bowling things over. Just now his 
 game is, I fancy, to consolidate his own power as Minister of 
 Algeria and the Colonies ; shaking himself free from all 
 Ministers of War, Trade, Foreign Affairs, &c., and managing 
 his own matters and all things 'ad colonialia' without 
 communication with anybody but the Emperor. He was 
 asking to whom I now reported my proceedings, or, what he 
 thought synonymous, who was Colonial Secretary. I ex- 
 plained that, though I was attached to the Colonial Depart- 
 ment, I communicated on this matter with Lord Malmesbury ; 
 on which Benedetti (turning to his chief) struck in with an 
 ' of course,' in which again H.I.H. replied by something which 
 was a mixture of grunt, chuckle, and horse-laugh. ' H'n. 
 Moi, je ne communique ' (that was not the word) ' qu'avec le 
 parlement, c'est a dire Napoleon Trois.' 
 
 To Miss S. Rogers. 
 
 Paris : January 4, 1859. 
 
 You will sec by the papers that the Emperor has given 
 the funds a kick by a short speech to the Austrian Ambassa- 
 dor. After a word of personal friendship for the Emperor
 
 1859 MISSION TO PARIS 
 
 197 
 
 of Austria he added, loud enough for every one to hear, ' but 
 I am sorry that our relations are not good.' 
 
 I must have expressed myself ill about Prince N. He is 
 pointedly civil and cordial to me. What made his party 
 rather oppressive to me was that the other Frenchmen did 
 not pity my solitude when I had no friend nigh. 
 
 To Hon. Mrs. Legge. 
 
 Paris : January 9, 1859. 
 
 My dear Marian, I intended to have given you an 
 account of the Napoleon's dinner No. 2, but in the first place 
 it was not very eventful ; and in the second place I thought 
 it would have enabled me to get back to London at once, 
 and so see you before long. However, I have been baulked 
 in my hope to get off this evening, and so have an hour for a 
 letter. 
 
 I only met this time Benedetti and Ferri Pisani (the Prince's 
 secretary). Prince Napoleon rather likes to talk, I think, of the 
 prospect of England's being radicalised by Mr. Bright, for he 
 was again upon that subject. Also he cross-examined me a 
 good deal about English official salaries and talked about 
 official arrangements. I forget whether I told you that at the 
 former dinner he was attacking Benedetti about the number of 
 Foreign Ministers that ought to be supplied by the Foreign 
 Department, and I laughed and said, ' Voila, monsieur, les 
 reformes que chacun fait dans les departements d'autrui.' 
 And he turned round quite eagerly and said ' Mais je les fais 
 dans le mien,' and went on, on the point. I believe he is a 
 good deal engaged on ' administrative reform ' as we should 
 call it. This time he was attacking bureaucracy and bureau- 
 crats, partly by way of chaffing Benedetti, and declared 
 that he had nine about him ; one was an engineer (Pisani, a 
 chef d'escadron, I observe), another something else, but none (I 
 understood) the practised official. On the other hand, Benedetti 
 was giving in names of old hands in the Algerian Depart- 
 ment, as much as to say, ' Ah, with all your new men it is 
 the old clerk that does the work.' However, it was a business
 
 198 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vi 
 
 affair altogether; we talked a little business in the grand 
 drawing-room (looking very different from the day in which 
 it was blazing with candles), then went in to dinner, then 
 back again to the drawing-room, when the Prince went to 
 sleep sitting on the sofa with a cigar in his mouth, a thing I 
 never saw before, then adjourned to the library to settle 
 some business. The only touch of character that I remember 
 was explaining (as he likes to do) the difficulty he has in 
 forcing this treaty down the throats of the old sailors and 
 the Colonial party. ' Je vous dis, il fallait le faire enfin par 
 ma volonte. II fallait dire absolument : Je le veux.' And I 
 dare say he did. 
 
 Now there are some little alterations to be settled, and he 
 wishes to see me again on them. So I am waiting without 
 knowing when he will appoint me. I have heard nothing 
 from him yet, though Pisani hoped I should not be kept over 
 Monday. 
 
 I suppose you have seen in the papers the Emperor's 
 speech to the Austrian Ambassador. I understand from 
 those who heard it that it was a little softened in the publica- 
 tion. It was : ' Je regrette que nos rapports soient mauvais, 
 mais vous direz a 1'Empereur que mes sentiments personnels 
 envers lui sont les memes.' The Servian question was con- 
 sidered ugly, but that seems by the papers to be settled. 
 But the real point is, of course, Italy. That is always in a 
 combustible state, and I suppose any encouragement from 
 England and France would set it in a blaze. 
 
 We have just been looking over the Hotel des Invalides 
 nothing to be compared with Greenwich Hospital in any 
 point of view, least of all in the cleanliness of the wards ; the 
 smell of the one we looked into was enough to knock a man 
 down. Also a look at Napoleon's tomb. It appears, how- 
 ever, that he is to be moved to St. Denis. I don't wonder at it. 
 We went there on Saturday (the most interesting and beau- 
 tiful thing I have seen here), and it seems at present a kind 
 of standing protest against all that has happened since the ex- 
 pulsion of the Bourbons. It is the custom of the church (where, 
 as you know, the kings of France are all buried) that there 
 should be an altar in mourning, as it were, for the last sove-
 
 1859 MISSION TO PARIS 
 
 199 
 
 reign buried there. It is now in mourning for Louis XVIII. 
 Of course, this is natural enough seeing Charles X. and 
 Louis Philippe both died in exile. But it has a kind of 
 ominous look which the present Napoleon, I could easily 
 fancy, would like to remove. So, I observe, thought a little 
 French Legitimist whom we met this morning at Lady Elgin's, 
 and who was introduced to me as Professor of Hindostanee and 
 one of the few remaining Gallicans in the French Church. It 
 was rather curious to see the way in which he felt himself 
 deserted by his Church, and looked (I think) with a species of 
 charity accordingly to the English. He was greatly disgusted 
 at the substitution of the Roman for the Parisian Liturgy 
 which is in course of taking place. At present, the Parisian 
 Liturgy is in actual use, but the Pope has ordered (as I 
 understand) the substitution of the Roman, and the Ultra- 
 montane ecclesiastics have contrived to suspend the printing 
 of the Parisian ; so that a person cannot at this moment 
 buy a copy of the Mass service as it is actually performed 
 in the churches of Paris. What an inconceivable state of 
 things ! M. de Tassis cries against the weakness of the 
 bishops in giving up their old service. But I suppose it is 
 really that they -are Ultramontanes and like it. 
 
 To the Rev. R. W. Church. 
 
 Ovington Square : January 17, 1859. 
 
 My dear Church, Here I am back, but only for a few 
 days. After I wrote to you, and some offs and ons had taken 
 place, I was summoned to dine again with the Prince Napoleon 
 on business, just himself, his secretary, Benedetti, and myself. 
 Well, we went through matters again ; one or two small objec- 
 tions were partially removed ; and then I proposed to come to 
 London with their amended project in my pocket to push it 
 through as fast as I can. Accordingly, I arrived last Thursday 
 and am to go through a course of Secretaries of State : Sir 
 Edward, Lord Stanley, and then Lord Malmesbury. Lord S- 
 will, of course, be the man who will settle in substance all the 
 Coolie part of the matter ; and I shall not be surprised if the 
 decision on one point which he has already arrived at stops
 
 200 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vi 
 
 the whole \ affair. However, I am to get my instructions 
 complete on all points (probably something in the nature of 
 an amended'project), and shall try to be back by the end of 
 this week, when Prince N. will be back from his marriage at 
 Turin. That seems a wretched affair. 
 
 I don't know that my further experience of the diplomats 
 added anything to my first-sight impressions. They go on, 
 one plausible and the other blustering, and T certainly have 
 had quite enough of them. Nap. was very curious about our 
 official arrangements, salaries, &c., disposal of patronage by 
 the Indian Secretary of State, and so on, with a great idea 
 that Bright is to become a great man, a Minister (which I 
 told him was likely enough) and a Prime Minister perhaps. 
 Also he professes himself a great ' radical ' in the matter of 
 ' libre echange,' takes credit, rather like a great boy, for push- 
 ing in that direction, and wants to get compliments from our 
 Ministry on a little advance in that direction which he pro- 
 poses to make in the convention. On the whole, however, it 
 is a great bore being with people with whom you have to 
 fence, and with whom, though you wish to get on well with 
 them for a purpose, and are glad to have seen them, you would 
 be best pleased to have no further relations. Intercourse is such 
 a dull thing if you neither have nor wish to have friendli- 
 ness in it. 
 
 Did I tell you of our visit to the Bourse? I think-not. 
 We were sent up a staircase into a gallery or loggia from 
 which you look down on a great square hall containing some 
 2,000 or 3,000 people. As we were coming up the stairs 
 (Edward and I) we heard a most tremendous clamour, and 
 supposed some extraordinary uproar, a man being torn in 
 pieces, or something of the kind. But when we had got up 
 so as to see it all, and had partly mastered what was going 
 on we realised that this was the normal state of the Paris 
 Stock Exchange. At one end of the room was a small ring 
 framed off as if for a prize fight, round this was a larger one, 
 outside the larger was the public in a dense crowd, inside the 
 smaller one nothing and nobody, but in the intermediate 
 annulus were about seventy or eighty brokers crowding to the 
 edge of the inner ring, and everybody making bargains across
 
 1859 MISSION TO PARIS 201 
 
 it with everybody. It seemed a kind of confused melee of 
 auctions, everybody being indiscriminately seller, buyer, and 
 auctioneer clamouring, gesticulating, taking notes I think 
 this was the most absurd thing I saw in Paris ; the most 
 interesting, if that can be called in Paris, was the Church of 
 St Denis and the monuments of the kings. I think I must 
 go the round of it again. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 F. R. 
 
 To Lady Rogers. 
 
 Sunday : January 23, 1859. 
 
 My dear Mother, The last I told you was, I think, that I 
 was to go through a course of Secretaries of State. First I 
 went off to Sir E. B. Lytton, who was in Cabinet and packed 
 off to him a note to say I wanted to see him and Lord Stanley 
 together or apart. No answer came to this, and I waited 
 accordingly some three or four hours (an hour after dinner 
 time) till at last out he came. He does not like the affair, I 
 should think, feeling that the colonists will be upon him about 
 it (which I don't think they will I seem to see my way about 
 that) and that he will generally be involved in squabbles and 
 troubles and things that he does not like, and that the other 
 Ministers are stronger than he, and will put upon him and take 
 the halfpence and leave him the kicks ; and so he expresses 
 a strong personal objection to this and that provision, and 
 then draws in his horns with a kind of querulous ' unless wiser 
 persons than I should take a different view ' like a man who 
 is afraid of being snubbed for having an opinion of his own. 
 The end is that Lord Stanley 4 was to talk to me about it ; 
 so the next day I was off to Leadenhall Street to find his 
 lordship, was told he was again at a Cabinet, found out he 
 was not, was recommended to rout him up at his private 
 house before 10 A.M. next morning, and ended by losing a 
 
 4 Lord Stanley (the late Lord Derby) the India Office (which he had just 
 
 was Secretary of State for the Colonies taken over), and was succeeded at the 
 
 in his father's Ministry which came into Colonial Office by Sir E. Bulwer Lytton. 
 
 office on the defeat of Lord Palmerston's The India Bill was passed in June 1858. 
 
 ' Conspiracy to Murder Bill ' in Feb- The East Indian Directors met in 
 
 ruary 1858, but he was transferred to Leadenhall Street.
 
 202 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vi 
 
 second day and writing a note asking an interview the next day. 
 In the evening, he sent for me in a sudden way to the Colonial 
 Office. I told him the then main question, and got him 
 to my views about them with a little reluctance (which 
 was all the better for me) as I want backbone. He was 
 pleasant, and soon decided the matter, made his notes on a 
 sheet of note-paper and stepped off at once to Lord Malmes- 
 bury 5 whom I tried to get hold of the next day. He was, 
 however, at Windsor, and appointed me for Friday, when 
 I saw him. He strikes me as a sensible but rather dull 
 man wishes more to get the matter through than Lord 
 Stanley does, and so is inclined to give up as much as possible. 
 Of course, this is natural enough, as he is not responsible for 
 the coolies. With him I regularly went through the treaty 
 clause by clause, putting my questions as I went on and 
 getting definite answers as far as I -cared to get them. Of 
 course, he could not know about details, but he rather took 
 my views about them, making, however, some good sugges- 
 tions, which nevertheless will, I think, hardly be sufficient to 
 escape what is perhaps the great difficulty of the whole, the 
 getting an ' effectual renunciation of the African Free Emigra- 
 tion ' as it is called. 
 
 From him I went to the ' Treaty Clerk ' at the Foreign 
 Office, and from that time I cannot complain that the work 
 has stood still. In the afternoon I was translating the French 
 draft convention, altering it in the proof ; in the evening he 
 was overhauling it ; in the morning I was settling off some 
 Colonial Office business with Merivale, 6 till he came to me with 
 his work done ; the rest of the morning I was resettling it with 
 him, or getting up information at the Slave Department of 
 the Foreign Office. From 6 to 9, B. and two clerks were 
 making three fair copies while I was dining, and from 10 to 
 12 I was again revising and writing a note to Lord Stanley, 
 while they, I hope, were dining or supping. To-day (Sunday) 
 I have delivered my letter at St. James's Square, but find 
 Lord S. out of town, and this evening I dine with Harding at 
 
 5 Foreign Secretary in Lord Derby's ceecled Sir James Stephen as Under 
 Ministry, March i858-March 1859. Secretary for the Colonies. 
 
 6 Mr. Herman Merivaie had sue-
 
 1859 MISSION TO PARIS 203 
 
 his desire (I suppose prompted from above) to talk over the 
 subject with him. G. told you of this little saying of Lord M.'s : 
 ' It will be a feather in your cap if you can get it done in 
 time for the Queen's Speech ' but I am afraid it is impossible, 
 I almost despair of getting off on Tuesday. And I cannot 
 see how the French objections which are sure to arrive can 
 possibly be disposed of, at the usual pace of work, in the 
 eight days which remain between Wednesday the 26th and 
 Wednesday the 2nd. 
 
 And now I want you to do something for me which is 
 to send hampers of game &c. from Blachford to the three 
 young men in the Colonial Office who lost their dinner and 
 kept their wives waiting in despair, in order to make three copies 
 of some thirty articles for me in a hurry. 
 
 To Lady Rogers. 
 
 Hotel Bedford, Paris : January 30, 1859. 
 
 My dear Mother, I had a desperate scamper at the last 
 all in a bustle, and had, after passing Tuesday night in the 
 steamer and railway, to sit up till one o'clock on Wednesday 
 night helping to make a copy of the convention in French 
 and English for Benedetti. A wretched concern it was, as a 
 matter of caligraphy I was perfectly ashamed of sending it 
 to him. However, I gave it to him the next morning. He 
 simply received it asking few questions, and treating it as not 
 impossible that it should get into the Queen's Speech. But 
 I hear Lord Cowley ' scouts the idea ' of its being possible. 
 Meantime I conjecture it to have gone to Turin to the Prince, 
 in which case I calculate I cannot hear of it until to-morrow, 
 and that only in case he answers by return of post. Seeing 
 that the Queen has to say her say on Tuesday it appears 
 unimaginable that it could be got into shape and sent to 
 London, approved, then signed and initialled here, and the 
 news of the signature and initialling sent home between the 
 two days ; the only possibility is that our draft is accepted 
 wholly, which will, of course, ease matters. . . . 
 
 In the afternoon I went with Georgie and Lady Augusta 
 Bruce to look at an infant school and one or two old houses
 
 204 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vi 
 
 in or about the Rue St. Antoine. Sully's old palace very 
 pompous and characteristic of the man, massive, substantial 
 and overloaded with ornament ; and the old palace of St. 
 Paul inhabited by Louis XIII., well worth seeing. There are 
 not many of these old spots about Paris, and so one values 
 what one can get. 
 
 We are pretty comfortable and tolerably cheap here. 
 The main evil is a portentous woman who dines steadily at 
 the table d'hote and talks the loudest, most self-satisfied, and 
 most utterly abominable French that I have heard for a 
 long time. I could hardly have imagined anything at once 
 so bad and so unhesitating ; I have never seen her at fault for 
 a moment, and she not only talks but dominates in French. 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 Paris : February 3, 1859. 
 
 It seems my matters must wait till Prince Napoleon comes 
 back with his bride, so I suppose I shall not get off before the 
 end of next week, if then. Lord Cowley is also clear that I 
 must be presented, and as the Emperor fixes the time for 
 such things that may be another delay. I understand that 
 the convention is to be, so I may perhaps have a dinner at 
 the Tuileries. If they were to fete the Princess Clotilde and 
 would ask me to one of their gaieties it would be a sight 
 worth seeing, though in some respects rather sad. 
 
 The principal event lately has been a dinner with Lady 
 Augusta Bruce, 7 a friend of Georgie's, at her mother's, Lady 
 Elgin's. The dinner was merely among themselves and 
 Baillie, an attache who married Lady Frances Bruce. But the 
 event of the evening was the coming in of an old gentle- 
 man, Comte de Bruce, who had been page to the Comte 
 d'Artois before the French Revolution. He was, of course, 
 a refugee, and was placed, by the interest of Lord Elgin, 8 
 in a regiment commanded by young M. de Bouille, and 
 so saved from the semi-starvation to which emigrants 
 
 'Afterwards married to Dean Stanley. s The Lord Elgin who brought home 
 
 She was then living with her mother in the' Elgin' marbles; he was grandfather 
 Paris. of the presen Viceroy of India.
 
 1859 MISSION TO PARIS 205 
 
 generally were reduced. He has the most grateful recollec- 
 tion of this, and pays it off to Lady Elgin, whom he has 
 lately found out, to his great satisfaction. She, poor lady, is 
 paralytic, without speech, and only expressing her meaning or 
 wishes by inarticulate sounds and gesticulations. It was very 
 touching to see the reverent old-fashioned way in which he 
 took her hand and kissed it coming in and going away. He 
 was, as he said, a Scotchman, living abroad by permission of 
 his sovereign : i.e. under a letter given by Charles I. in 1633 
 to one of his ancestors, a cadet of the Elgin Bruces. Lady 
 Augusta regularly set herself to set him going upon old times 
 and away he went. We had been reading the very period in 
 Carlyle the evening before, and I cannot express the strange 
 feeling it gave one to hear this old gentleman quietly 
 dropping his allusions and sentiments in the easy familiar 
 way of personal knowledge, just on the points which we had 
 been previously reading of, as history, not of but before the 
 Revolution. It was as if a man had started after dinner with 
 ' 1 remember Julius Caesar saying to me just as he was going 
 off to Gaul. ' Lady A. asked him whether he had not once 
 borne Marie Antoinette's train, and he answered in the kind 
 of half modest, half self-satisfied disclaimer of a man who 
 wishes to keep the credit without appearing to make more of 
 himself than he deserves. ' Ah, c'etait un hasard. La Reine 
 etait allee voir Mesdames Tantes avec Monsieur ' (Mesdames 
 Tantes being the daughters of Louis XV. whom Carlyle 
 mentions as having stuck to him on his death-bed, and the 
 Count being page to Monsieur, afterwards Louis XV 1 1 1.), ' et 
 son service n'etait pas la, ainsi il fallait' that I should carry 
 her train. ' Ah, Mesdames Tantes etaient tres aimees de la 
 Reine et de tout le monde, parce qu'elles etaient tres bonnes 
 et toujours tres bonnes pour moi, puisque Louis Quinze 
 .aimait beaucoup mon oncle. Quand mon oncle se retirait de 
 son service, il disait : " Tous mes bons serviteurs me quittent." ' 
 Then Lady A. tried to make out whether in the years '85-6-7 
 there was in the Court any of that vague apprehension which 
 one might have imagined, and there was a kind of curious 
 familiarity, a matter-of-courseness, which seemed to carry one 
 back like a shot, when he said with half surprise : ' Mais non,
 
 206 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vi 
 
 c'etait avant I'assemblee des notables.' He told us that he 
 was in the antechamber when Cardinal de Rohan passed 
 through to the King and was arrested on his way out ; and he 
 looked at him with all his eyes because he had never seen a 
 Cardinal before. He was still at that time page to Monsieur, 
 and he described how he and his fellow pages were well treated 
 by the mob. 'On aimait ma livree parce qu'on croyait que Mon- 
 sieur avait des idees populaires, mais les pages de Monseigneur ' 
 (Charles X.) ran the risk of their lives in going into Paris 
 (Carlyle again). He said that de Rohan was arrested by one 
 d'Agoust, major in the Gardes du Corps, with some of his 
 brethren, who were all so much employed in that kind of work 
 that it was said to be a family of ' bons chiens d'arret.' They 
 have a descendant in Paris, a little insignificant man, as the 
 Count de B.'s daughter was making out. ' C'est done le nain de 
 la famille,' said the old gentleman ; ' ils etaient beaux hommes, 
 les d'Agoust.' Then he explained that from his pageship he 
 was promoted into the army, the regiment (I think M. de 
 Bouille's), but not the detachment, which was to have taken 
 charge of the King on the flight to Varennes. Lady A. ob- 
 served that that affair was ' mal mene,' and he answered quite 
 quickly, like a subaltern standing up for his colonel, ' Mais M. 
 de Bouille ne le mena pas mal,' and then went off into a 
 panegyric on M. de Bouille ; how when he was Governor of 
 St. Lucia and an English frigate was wrecked there in time 
 of war, he helped them all he could, and would not make them 
 prisoners, and sent them home, saying that it was not the 
 French army that beat them but the elements ; how the 
 English merchants gave him a sword and pistols at the end 
 of the war to show their sense of the generous way in which 
 he had carried it on ; how, when he was overhead and ears in 
 debt and the King determined to pay his debts for him, he 
 thanked his Majesty and requested leave to draw on the 
 Treasury for TOO crowns, his debts being nearer 50,000. 
 
 Then we came to more modern times, and were greatly 
 amused by his answering with the slow deliberation of a man 
 who feels he is going to say something heretical, almost shock- 
 ing, ' Moi, j'avoue, j'ai un peu de respect pour Napoleon ' (then, 
 very distinctly, to prevent any misconception) ; ' je veux dire
 
 1859 MISSION TO PARIS 207 
 
 Napoleon premier.' People should have known what France 
 was then, to know what he did for it. ' Nous devons a lui que 
 la chretiente existe en France.' 
 
 To Miss S. Rogers? 
 
 Paris : February 5, 1859. 
 
 My dear Sophy, Lady Augusta Bruce is a treasure, and 
 her idea of a dinner party is a good one four persons to a 
 plain dinner, and at the dinner or in the evening one person 
 who is really worth meeting. The day before yesterday she 
 gave us a M. Mohl, a German by extraction, Professor of San- 
 scrit, hater of the French official hierarchy, as they call it, and 
 above and beyond all, of Louis Napoleon, but naturalised here 
 for thirty years or so, and a person of extreme fun. The 
 evening (or the best part of it) reduced itself into an account 
 of all his adventures while in the National Guard. I wish I 
 could give you them ; but, in the first place, I cannot remember 
 all, and next, half the fun was in his vigorous and lively way 
 of telling it, and his very good but strongly accented English. 
 I will try, however, and you must fancy all his sayings in 
 French or German-English every syllable equally accented, 
 foreign words here and there, English familiar phrases slightly 
 diverted from their uses, and .so on, but fluent and pointed. 
 Imprimis, he was obliged in 1830 to enter the National 
 Guard, and, abhorring it and all that belonged to it, set himself 
 in the first place to consider how, without subjecting himself 
 to any penalty, he could get out of it. The best way which 
 occurred to him was to get a copy of the 287 articles of war, 
 to put them up on the wall of his room, and to make himself 
 such a perfect master of them that by a proper and constant 
 use of them (being a man of talent, industry, coolness, and in- 
 finite humour) he might make himself so utterly insupportable 
 to everybody as to tire them into turning him out. H. will 
 fully appreciate the extreme wisdom of his proceedings ; though 
 it seems to have cost him twelve years' labour to accomplish 
 his object. However, here are two or three of his anecdotes 
 
 9 This letter has already appeared in print. It was published in the Spectator 
 after M. Mohl's death.
 
 208 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vi 
 
 supply foreign accent. ' Now I will show you how they did 
 things in those days. I will tell you about the man who was 
 assassinated. While I was on duty at night in. the Corps du 
 Garde, a man came rushing in to say there was a terrible thing 
 they were assassinating a man in the Rue Cherche-Midi. 
 Well, instead of our going out as fast as we could to help this 
 man who was assassinating or assassinated, the officer says to 
 me, Go immediately and tell the Commissaire de Police : he 
 lives in the Rue Crenelle, under a red lamp. Well, away I go 
 and find my Rue Crenelle and red lamp and I make a great 
 noise at the door for a long time. At last a head with a night- 
 cap comes out at the window and asks me what in the world 
 I want. " The Commissaire de Police," say I. " Well, I am 
 the Commissaire de Police. What do you want ? " " There 
 is a man being assassinated in the Rue Cherche-Midi." 
 " Which side of the gutter ? " says he. Well, I did not know 
 about one side or the other side, so I say at once boldly, " The 
 right side as you come down the street." " Ah," he says, " that 
 is in the other arrondissement ; go to the other Commissaire, 
 No. Rue ." So away I go, with my man being assassi- 
 nated all the time, and I find my other Commissaire. " Which 
 side of the gutter ? " says he. So I thought at any rate I will stick 
 to my story, and I say, " The right side coming down the street." 
 " Ah," dit-il, " cela me regarde. But how long is it since they 
 have been assassinating him ? " ' About three quarters of an 
 hour," say I. " Ah, then he is dead by this time. We must 
 get two men and a stretcher to carry him away." So we get 
 two men and a stretcher, and I went with them, for I wanted 
 to see whether the man was on the right side of the gutter or 
 not ; and we found him lying stone dead in the gutter. But 
 he was more on the right side than the left, and he was stabbed 
 through the heart, so the three-quarters of an hour did not 
 signify. But this is the way they do things here.' 
 
 Then came instances of his own mode of performing mili- 
 tary duty. You must remember that in Louis Philippe's time, 
 the Line and the National Guard were doubled up, as it were, 
 every sentry consisting of one Liner and one National. He 
 had begun by giving us an account of the ' gone ' or ' gohn ' 
 (gun) which had been issued to him, incapable of going off,
 
 1859 MISSION TO PARIS 209 
 
 and bought cheap from the Tower of London because the 
 English wanted to get rid of it. This ' gohn ' played a great 
 part in all his adventures. ' One day, when I was going down 
 to take my twenty-four hours' duty, I thought how I should 
 get through the time, and as I was going down, I stop at a 
 bouquiniste, what you call bookstall, and bought a dozen 
 brochures or so, to read till I go home again. And when I 
 get to my post I put my " g5hn " carefully away in my sentry 
 box and sit down to read. There was a little dwarf wall under 
 the archway by my sentry box a wall round the corner to 
 prevent the carriages coming on the trottoir so I spread out my 
 dozen brochures on the dwarf wall, and I choose out the one I 
 like best, and I sit down among my books and I begin my 
 reading. Well, presently I hear a gentleman go by on horse- 
 back who talks to the soldiers, and seems very much discom- 
 posed ; but I do not pay any attention, and when he is gone, 
 up comes the soldier and says, " National, you are in a scrape ; 
 vous donnez scandale." "Why should I be in a scrape ? " says I. 
 " Nous verrons." Well, presently I hear a noise, and I look up 
 and I see our capitaine running along without his cap, and 
 carrying his sword in his hand to run faster, and he runs up 
 to me and he says, " Mais quel scandale ! Quel horreur ! " " Mais 
 quel scandale, capitaine ? " lui dis-je ; " qu'est-ce qui est arrive ? " 
 " Mais c'est vous c'est vous est-ce que c'est comme ga que 
 vous montez garde ? Oil estvotre fusil ?" " It is safe in my 
 sentry box," say I. " Et vos livres ! est-ce done que vous tenez 
 ici boutique de bouquiniste ? " " It is only something for me 
 to read. I cannot wait here all day doing nothing." " Et vous 
 restez toujours assis comme ga ? " " Mais oui I have not the 
 force in my legs to keep always standing." " C'est un scandale, 
 vous dis-je c'est un scandale." " Mais qu'est-ce qu'il faut 
 done faire, capitaine ? " And as he was a reasonable man, I 
 got him at last to consent to a compromise. I had found out 
 by this time which of my brochures was worth reading and 
 which were not ; so I agreed that I would take my " gohn " out 
 of my sentry box, and I would put there in its stead my eleven 
 brochures which were not worth reading, and I would sit on 
 my dwarf wall and put my " gdhn " between my knees, and go 
 on reading my twelfth brochure.'
 
 2 io LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vi 
 
 Another in the same spirit : ' One day I was told to 
 stand sentry under an archway to prevent the carriages from 
 passing under it. But I find that the masons had made a 
 scaffolding and a wall, and a great mess altogether, so that a 
 dog could not pass, much less a carriage ; so I sit down, and 
 take out my newspaper and spread it out before my eyes and 
 begin reading. Well, before long I hear somebody chatter- 
 ing and sputtering behind my newspaper, and I turn down 
 the top and look over it and see a capitaine of the line in a 
 great rage, and he says, " What are you about ? What do you 
 suppose you are here for ? " "I am here," I say, " to prevent 
 carriages from going through ; mais je les en defie, done je 
 cultive mon esprit. " And so we fell into an argument, and at 
 last says he, " But with that newspaper before your eyes you 
 cannot salute an officer as he passes." So I say to him quite 
 quietly, " Y tenez-vous, capitaine ? " and that put him out of 
 himself. " Votre nom ? " me dit-il. " Je ne pourrais pas vous 
 le dire." " Mais vous connaissez votre nom ? " " Mais vraiment 
 cette occupation me rend si stupide que je ne pourrais rien dire 
 avec certitude. Demandez au Corps du Garde." Now I must 
 tell you there was one thing about which we Nationals all 
 agreed, that nobody should get any information at the Corps 
 du Garde. " Who is the sentry at the gate of the Tuileries ? " 
 " We do not know." " Let me see thefeuille de service" " There 
 it is, but it will tell you nothing, for the Nationals are always 
 exchanging duties, and the changes are not entered." And so it 
 was that my capitaine went away and I heard no more of him.' 
 Lastly you shall have his crowning exploit, after which 
 they never put him on duty again. The law authorises the 
 officers to call out National Guards for twenty-four hours' 
 duty ; but they used to add on to this two hours extra, 
 calling them out two hours before the duty begins, for drill 
 and parade. Our friend knew and did not like this ; so he 
 presented himself two hours after the time appointed, and 
 quietly took up a position ready to fall in when the parade 
 was over and the Nationals dismissed to their respective 
 posts. ' When the parade was over, the colonel saw me 
 standing at my ease, and that I had not been parading with 
 the rest (which was as plain as a pikestaff) and asked me
 
 1859 MISSION TO PARIS 211 
 
 why I had not come before. " Because," say I, " the law only 
 allows you to call me out for twenty-four hours, and as I know 
 you will not send me away before 1 1 o'clock to-morrow, I have 
 not come before 1 1 o'clock to-day." " Ah ! " says he, " la garde 
 nationale se perdra par les raisonnements." " Toute chose," 
 lui dis-je, " se perd par son ennemi naturel." Then he tells me 
 that he will give me double duty, and I tell him that I must 
 submit, but that I shall bring an action against him for abus 
 de pouvoir. However, he gives me double duty at the gate, 
 which is now blocked up, from the garden of the Tuileries on 
 to the Seine. Well, there I went, and as there were a great 
 many of my friends going to and fro there, I begin talking to 
 them, when a little gentleman with a fine cane begins a 
 conversation with me. " Well, National, it is a fine day ; how 
 do you like beingon guard ? " and after a word or two he says : 
 " You do not seem to know me." I say, " I have not the 
 honour of your acquaintance." Says he, " I am the colonel of 
 your regiment." Say I, " And I am the National Guard whom 
 you ordered to do double duty this morning, and if you are a 
 colonel (he was in plain clothes) you ought to know that 
 it is an offence to speak to a sentry on his post, and I -there- 
 fore arrest you for it, and will trouble you to walk into my 
 sentry box till the corporal comes round to let you out." 
 " Ah ! " says he, " that is ^plaisanterie" " Du tout" says I ; " je 
 ne plaisante jamais avec la baionnette. Go into my sentry 
 box or the soldier opposite will put his hand on your collar 
 and put you in." He did not like this at all, as he was one 
 of the fine gentlemen of Paris, the Due de Grammont, I think, 
 and he did not want to stand like an ape behind me in my 
 sentry box, for all his fine friends to laugh at when they 
 passed. The only thing I wondered at was why he did not 
 sink into the earth. For what could he do ? He had before 
 him a man with a gun in his hand, with the law on his side 
 (for he was dans son tort\ and his mortal enemy. So he made 
 a great fuss about it, and at last I let him go, telling him he 
 had better not be so strict to other people another time. 
 After that I was never called out to do duty again.' 
 
 Yours affectionately, 
 
 F/R.
 
 212 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vi 
 
 Hotel de Bedford : February 14, 1859. 
 
 My dear Edward, I went last night to the ball given by 
 the Prefet and Municipality of Paris at the Hotel de Ville to 
 Prince Napoleon and the Princess Clotilde. Never did I 
 conceive anything so beautiful. The Tuileries is a thing 
 wholly not to be spoken of in the same sentence with it. In 
 the first place, it is not in a suite of apartments that you are, 
 mind, but in a palace upstairs, downstairs, galleries, stair- 
 cases, corridors, saloons, small sitting-rooms or cabinets ; here 
 and there ball-rooms, here and there refreshment-rooms ; 
 servants in white liveries everywhere about, telling you which 
 way to go ; and all in a blaze of light. The main ball-room 
 has a magnificent gallery, about (I should guess) 200 feet long, 
 the sides formed by a row of Corinthian columns, white 
 and gold, projecting from the wall, with rich satin damask 
 curtains between each, and in front of each a large chandelier 
 thirteen compartments, making on both sides twenty-six 
 chandeliers in all. Then above that the usual kind of ceiling, 
 only so high as to give room for a second row of windows on 
 one side of the room, and a gallery a kind of triforium, you 
 may say on the other. This was the grand ball-room ; to 
 this there was an ante-chamber, smaller but more beautiful, 
 the upper gallery being not so much set on the ceiling, but 
 a kind of loggia, only with caryatides instead of columns 
 from this above I saw the entry of the prince below. But 
 far more beautiful was what I call (by way of distinction, for 
 room it was not) the music room. First fancy yourself in a 
 quad as big as a small Oxford quad, the said quad being 
 made up of a colonnade all round below and a second colonnade 
 all round above, the lower colonnade ornamented by marble 
 columns, the upper by statues standing above each column ; 
 above both a tallish roof with dormer windows, in the form 
 of the Hotel de Ville at Rouen, but with Renaissance details. 
 Then from the top, or nearly so, of the roof of the quad, 
 starts a fresh roof which shall cover in the quad ; then put a 
 rich carpet on the ground, with curtains in all the apertures 
 of the colonnade, richly dressed centgardes at the side of 
 each column, lamps in the hands of all statues, chandeliers in 
 front of each arch, lamps in close line along but below the
 
 1859 MISSION TO PARIS 213 
 
 banisters of the staircase, so that up to the very top there was 
 no mysterious darkness (three stories high, remember) ; and 
 then under the staircase a plentiful fountain playing, the water 
 rushing up, falling into basins, and then rolling out of sight 
 over two or three steps among yuccas, camellias, and all sorts 
 of flowers and evergreens, with a great gurgling and coolness. 
 No plaster or painting, but all that you saw honest stone, and 
 marble, and carpet, and damask, and all the galleries crowded 
 with brilliantly dressed people, leaning their elbows on rich 
 velvet hangings, to look at you below. Of course all these 
 galleries were part of your range, and the people in them not 
 spectators, but you. The company with jewels, and artificial 
 flowers, and silks, and satins. Then in another place you 
 came on a low, long gallery, broken in by columns or piers 
 with nothing but trellis-work and roses (real bona-fide creeping 
 or trained roses about you). Then perhaps a second great 
 Louis-Quatorze ball-room ; then a pleasant room, all light- 
 blue hangings, light-blue curtains, light-blue chairs, pretty 
 and ladylike ; then you dropped on tea and ices ; then dif- 
 ferent forms of staircase, differently treated in point of orna- 
 ment. The only defect was that before long you found that 
 you had wholly lost your bearings, and became unable to get 
 back to any place which you wanted to reach up, down, in, 
 or out and could only recognise an old friend when you 
 came upon it. I hope it will be open to the public to-day, in 
 which case I shall go to have a look at it by daylight a sad 
 falling-off, but it will be like looking up one's analysis for 
 Collections. The blaze of light in these places is astounding. 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 9 Ovington Square : February 28, 1859. 
 
 I have not much to say here, except that Sir E. B. Lytton 
 is in a great quandary about a committee on West Indian 
 matters, which has been asked for by one of the race of 
 Buxton. Everybody is agreed that it ought to be stopped, 
 but it is by no means so clear that it can be ; and if it can't, 
 why, then, Ministry must not try. If it is given, of course I 
 shall have to appear to give the Government account of the
 
 2i 4 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vi 
 
 immigration, which will be the main object of attack. Lord 
 Carnarvon had a great talk about it with me last Thursday, 
 wishing to know what sort of case I considered we had. I 
 think we have a very good one, and told him so, and that I 
 had no fear of the committee, though I quite agreed that it 
 would be very troublesome, and ought to be quashed if pos- 
 sible ; but that I did not think that Government should 
 oppose it with an obstinacy that looked like fear. ' Do you 
 feel sure that we shall have an overwhelming answer to 
 everything that is brought up ? ' ' Overwhelming is a big 
 word, and nobody can tell certainly what they may bring up ; 
 but I feel sure that, before a fair committee, the immigration 
 can, on the whole, be thoroughly justified and shown to have 
 been successful.' ' Oh, we must get something better than a 
 fair committee. Well, I think I understand now where we 
 stand and what to be about. Thank you very much.' And 
 so we stand for the present. I suppose the committee will 
 be given, and am not without a certain curiosity about the 
 result. If it comes, I shall not be altogether sorry. 
 
 I suppose I am safe here till Lord Cowley comes back 
 from Vienna, and then it is of course a chance what happens. 
 If they accept bodily the draft which they have in their hands, 
 which is hardly probable, or if they refuse it bodily, which is 
 hardly possible, after what the Emperor said to Lord Cowley 
 I shall not go back. But if, which is most likely, they 
 refuse some changes of detail, accepting in the main, then I 
 shall have to go. I don't know whether Georgie told you 
 that Lady Augusta Bruce wants me to put up at Lady 
 Elgin's, which will be pleasant. And this I shall do, for some 
 days at least, unless her spare room is occupied by one of her 
 brothers. I shall have the profit and pleasure, probably, of 
 seeing some nice French people, and shall have the satisfac- 
 tion of feeling that I really shall be useful to them in the 
 evenings in helping to amuse poor Lady Elgin. I can't say 
 I look with any pleasure to renewing my acquaintance with 
 Plon-plon ; that marriage of his really makes one sick to 
 think of. 1 never heard a man so generally abused. Pro- 
 bably he will have little to say to me. 
 
 I have my hands pretty full, and so am taking the oppor-
 
 1859 MISSION TO PARIS 215 
 
 tunity of Sunday evening to write, and shall put up at once 
 without waiting to see what to-morrow produces. Love to 
 all. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 F. R. 
 
 To Lady Rogers. 
 
 Colonial Office : April 29, 1859. 
 
 My hands are pretty free. There is a flow of easy work 
 not very heavy nor yet very light and Lord Carnavon is very 
 pleasant to do work with. He makes me feel that he relies 
 on me and likes making work. And it is pleasant to have to 
 deal with a person who sees the absurd side of things as much 
 as he does. He certainly has the advantage of not being 
 anxious. He was breakfasting with Gladstone yesterday, and 
 tells me that Gladstone is furiously Sardinian. He Lord C. 
 is as furiously Austrian, has read the whole history of the 
 Revolutionary War to test Austrian character, and finds that 
 under all their terrible trials they never once broke faith or 
 shuffled with us. 
 
 You will see that the ' Times ' is finding out all sorts of 
 bad omens sales of charts, &c., &c. No doubt it looks as if 
 a terrible time was coming. However, I think our people are 
 inclined to brace themselves up to it. Taxes will be their 
 first test. Certainly the war is not of our seeking. I hope 
 the big wars which we don't seek may not be coming as a 
 punishment for the little wars that we do. 
 
 Wolfe tells me that the elections are going on very Con- 
 servatively. Four gains to-day. G. Hope and Vansittart at 
 the head of the poll at Windsor, others I don't remember. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 F. ROGERS. 
 
 May 3, 1859. 
 
 My picture gives satisfaction. 1 We were amused at an 
 old gentleman who was looking at it while we were laughing 
 about it behind him, and catching the idea, accomplished a 
 
 1 His portrait by the late Mr. George Richmond, R.A., was in the Academy 
 exhibition of 1859.
 
 216 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vi 
 
 very gradual ' right-about face ' so as to get a look at the 
 original. But unluckily, just as he had accomplished his 
 artful object, I quite unconsciously wished good-bye (to A. 
 and S.) and ran off a loss for him. 
 
 I have read ' The Bertrams,' a wretched book. The part 
 about Jerusalem is really too offensive to be read. He means 
 to satirise the coarse way in which people take their pleasure 
 about holy places, and so he himself, in the very act of doing 
 so, makes literary capital out of it. It is just as if a fellow 
 were to draw a smart, lively description of some disgusting 
 outrage which had been offered to his wife or sister, and 
 print it in the newspaper by way of shaming the offender. 
 
 I am not very sensitive, I think, in many things of that 
 kind. I mean I often defend people who are accused of pro- 
 fanity for satirising or exposing what is profane. But this is 
 indefensible. The Waddington is well drawn, though dis- 
 gusting. It brings out very well the dangers of that strength 
 of mind which enables a man or woman to act steadily on a 
 principle, instead of allowing themselves to be carried away 
 by a feeling which after all may be a truer guide than the 
 principle. In her case, of course, the principle is pride and 
 worldly prudence. 
 
 But it illustrates, I think well, the danger of being strong 
 enough to overrule your instincts, especially, perhaps, in a 
 woman. 
 
 To Rev. R. W. Church. 
 
 Paris : Hotel Castiglione. 
 
 September 4, 1859. 
 
 My dear Church, Ecconii. After bringing me up from 
 Blachford, the Ministers could not make up their minds, and 
 kept me for a fortnight in London while they were deciding 
 pretty much what, if there had been less cooks to the broth, 
 might have been settled in two or three hours, and I might have 
 visited you comfortably after all. I had my interview with 
 Lord John,- which was rather amusing. He is very courteous, 
 with a pleasing smile and dignified manner ; but his small 
 
 2 Lord John Russell was then Foreign Secretary ; the Duke of Newcastle 
 Secretary for the Colonies
 
 1859 MISSION TO PARIS 217 
 
 size is almost droll, when you are receiving orders from him, 
 or answering questions. He asked me a question or two 
 let me talk talked about some old doings of his own respect- 
 ing emigration, and let the conversation rather drop, without 
 indicating clearly whether he wanted me to be off or not a 
 mistake, as I think, of great men, who are entitled to keep 
 you as long as they choose, and send you away when they 
 have done with you. However, I considered that ' When 
 you doubt, be off,' and acted accordingly. I believe he really 
 is a shy man, and does not know how to do a thing of 
 that kind easily. His manner was a good composed one, 
 which did not let out much, and quite friendly, but in the 
 solemn line ; and his talk rather too much on the ' I did so 
 and so.' Well, at last I got off and have been about ten 
 days here. I am now doing business with Chasseloup Laubat, 
 the Colonial Minister, who is certainly rather an amusing 
 contrast with Lord John and the Duke of Newcastle, lively 
 good-humoured, frank-mannered, a great talker, seeming to 
 tell you much and expecting you to be equally open with 
 him, and liking a triumph in the way of chaff. There was in 
 our English draft an error of copying- 3 for 5 instead of 5 for 
 3 ; there was also what was worse an absurd bull in point 
 of language, the consequence of making an alteration in a 
 principal phrase, without altering what hangs on to it- 
 These he inflicted on me in the most unrelenting way (all very 
 good-humoured). I think he must have made me a present 
 at least half a dozen times of the clerical error. I see him 
 again to-morrow and dine with him on Tuesday. I have 
 often thought of writing to you to see whether after all you 
 would come over here. But there is such a continual un- 
 certainty about my stay that I never can fix on any plan 
 which will last for more than a few days. At first I thought 
 the matter would go off wholly and at once, but it has fallen 
 back into its old state of hammering out details. I suppose 
 I can hardly be off under ten days from this time. But there 
 is no telling. Things might take a turn which would send 
 me to London off-hand, or keep me here for weeks. The 
 Emperor, it is said, wishes it decidedly to go on, and as Lord 
 Cowley says : ' Any point on which you and Chasseloup can't
 
 2i8 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vi 
 
 agree is to be referred to him.' I felt rather tall at being so 
 near the great man of the age. By the way, Lord C. men- 
 tioned as a thing that ' ought to be known ' that at the be- 
 ginning of the Crimean war the Emperor proposed that 
 England should send one fifth of the troops, the whole to be 
 under the command of a French general, while France should 
 furnish one fifth of the ships to be under the command of an 
 English admiral ; to which Lord C. replied that that was all 
 very well in the abstract, but made the objection ' Our soldiers 
 will serve honestly under your general, and so far so good. 
 But I defy you to name a single captain in the French navy 
 who will honestly serve under an English admiral ; ' to which 
 Louis Napoleon replied : ' Be it so ; but see where you are 
 driving me ; if you will not take my proposal you are driving 
 me to increase my fleet. And take my word for it, that in 
 three or four years you will be complaining of the very 
 increase that you have forced upon me.' I don't know that 
 it quite bears out the inference that Lord C. desired to draw 
 from it, but it certainly shows remarkable foresight. 
 
 His (the Emperor's) view now is, arm as much as you like ; 
 every independent nation has a right to arm as much as it 
 thinks necessary for its own security. ' But I think it very 
 hard that you should throw the blame on me, and say that you 
 are arming against me.' Lord Cowley says that the Emperor 
 was greatly disgusted with the apathy of the Italians. The 
 French took with them into Lombardy 28,000 stand of arms, 
 expecting a popular rising, and that they would be able to 
 distribute them among the insurgents. They were able to 
 distribute 500. He also mentioned, as true, the story that 
 an Italian town which had welcomed, in great triumph, 
 the French soldiers, pulled down the tricolor and ran up 
 the Austrian colours on a rumour that the French had been 
 beaten. So you see your view of the relations between the 
 Emperor and the Italians was pretty correct. It is really a 
 curious spectacle, the working up of the little Italian States. 
 I suppose \ve shall now soon know what is to become of 
 them. 
 
 I was too late for all the military fetes here, not crossing 
 until a week after they were all over, and the soldiers des-
 
 1859 MISSION TO PARIS 219 
 
 patched to their garrisons. I hear that Paris was uncommonly 
 glad to get rid of the Zouaves and Turcos, and that the 
 soldiers themselves did not at all like the affair, but would 
 much rather have been sent off to their garrisons, instead of 
 being whisked up by railway to a dusty camp, and there 
 made a spectacle of for the Parisians. 
 
 To the Rev. R. W. Church. 
 
 Hotel Castiglione : 
 
 September 23, 1859. 
 
 My dear Church, Here still, and I don't know when I 
 am to get away. 
 
 We have had some amusing interviews with Chasseloup 
 Laubat. I told you of his luncheon on a lump of sugar, of 
 which he offered me a part, and of his talking almost three 
 and a half hours at a rush, and of our agreement in not liking 
 the job which we had to settle. Well, the Emperor settled 
 that the thing was to go on, and sogo on we did, and are 
 getting over the details with some small difficulties hanging 
 about us, and one apparently insuperable ahead. I am struck 
 rather with the kind of difficulties which arise ; they seem to 
 be matters of phrase or language the peremptory stringent 
 mode of drafting, which is English, seems to hurt their 
 feelings ; they want to be treated like gentlemen in legal 
 documents. But then it is sometimes not perfectly clear whether 
 this extreme susceptibility is not a contrivance to keep open 
 loopholes. There was an amusing specimen of our mode of 
 proceeding in the very first article. It stood (at the desire of 
 Prince Napoleon) that the Indians should be at liberty to 
 emigrate freely to the French colonies. I objected that they 
 should add ' sous les conditions ci-apres stipulees.' The 
 matter seemed one of mere language, and so was treated ; 
 till at last M. de Chasseloup Laubat, being driven into a 
 corner, let out that the Prince at the council had made a 
 great puffing and blowing about this clause, explaining that 
 the influence of France was conferring on the poor Indians, 
 who had hitherto been cramped up in their country, the 
 ' liberty of emigration.' ' Mais le Prince nous a dit que' &c.
 
 220 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vi 
 
 On which I instantly replied that I thought the Indian Govern- 
 ment, if that view of the matter were suggested to them, 
 would reply that they did not make stipulations with a 
 foreign power for the good government of their own subjects, 
 that they knew what was good for them, and would of course 
 do it, but would not be inclined to admit of foreign meddling ; 
 on which, with a kind of half laugh, half shrug, he said : ' Ah 
 mais nous autres Francais, voyez-vous, nous aliens porter 
 partout la liberte (action of hands in the air) pff pff comme 
 en Italic.' Shrug again. And so the matter dropped and I 
 hope is settled. 
 
 Another mot amused me. He had been very critical 
 both on our draft (which we were rash enough to have trans- 
 lated into French at the Embassy) and on the frequency of 
 my petites c/ioses, small stickings in of words and phrases 
 which seemed to me necessary to make the thing as water- 
 tight as it ought to be. And I had told him that this was all 
 very well for him who was a Minister of State to pick holes 
 in the work, but that it was not so easy a matter for me who 
 was but representative of half a dozen Ministers who were 
 not always quite agreed among themselves. And I had 
 asked him whether the French had the proverb of ' too many 
 cooks.' Presently we came to one of the awkwardnesses 
 which had been imparted into the affair by the translation 
 made by an Attache. My friend stopped : ' Puisque trop de 
 cuisiniers font mauvais potage, qu'est-ce qu'il en arrive, quand 
 les marmitons s'en melent ? ' 
 
 Another thing was too horrible to be laughed at at 
 least almost. I had written home and to you about his 
 talking three and a half hours. I had also told Lord 
 Cowley, who told me that he did not know him, that he got 
 on very well, but that he was a great talker. In the middle 
 of one of our colloquies, a propos to nothing very particular, 
 he broke out ' Est-ce que vous avez dit a Lord Cowley que 
 je suis bavard ? Lord Cowley ne me connait pas, n'est-ce 
 pas ? ' I was aghast, as you may imagine, thinking for a 
 moment whether it \vas only his conscience that made him 
 suppose that I had said it, and mine that made me suppose 
 he had heard it, or whether Lord Cowley had betrayed me
 
 1859 MISSION TO PARIS 221 
 
 to Walewski, and Walewski had thereupon chaffed Chasseloup, 
 or what had happened. The concurrence of thoughts ' Lord 
 Cowley ne me connait pas ' seemed like a repetition of the 
 Chantilly talk. Nothing better occurred to me than to look 
 surprised (in which there was no difficulty) and to say ' Je 
 lui ai dit que nous avions beaucoup parle.' And I must say 
 that I wish it had not happened. 
 
 We have been to Fontainebleau twice, and we were lucky 
 enough to cut in for a stag hunt. I wrote a long account of 
 it home, which I think would amuse you, and if you would 
 send this to Blachford and ask them to let you read the 
 Fontainebleau stag hunt, it would be an exchange profitable, 
 I flatter myself, to both. 
 
 I must finish, so good-bye. Kind remembrances to your 
 wife ; mine sends her love. We are very glad to hear so good 
 an account of you all. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 F. R. 
 
 To Lady Rogers. 
 
 Paris : October 21, 1859 
 
 I have dined twice at the Rue de Lille, meeting Baillie 
 both times and M. de Fresne last time. We were a little 
 prosy. He is of course very hot about Austria and the good 
 Austrian government of Italy and had a fight with Baillie. He 
 told a revolution story, which, however, sounded to me 
 (coming from him) a little got up. The revolutionary autho- 
 rities were anxious to get hold of a priest who was in the 
 habit, contrary to law, of visiting the dying and administering 
 the Sacrament, and some blackguards settled that one of 
 them would affect to be dying and send for him, and then 
 they would catch him in the act of performing the office. 
 They accordingly sent and he came, but when he came up to 
 the bed he said, ' Mais comment ? vous etes trop tard, 1'homme 
 est mort.' And so he was. The others were so alarmed at 
 what seemed a judgment that from that reason (or from the 
 criminal act not having been performed") the priest escaped.
 
 222 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vi 
 
 To Lady Rogers. 
 
 Paris : October 24, 1859. 
 
 I have been rather often at the Rue de Lille by invitation 
 or otherwise. I was talking yesterday with Mile, des 
 Pomarets of the first emigration, which she greatly dis- 
 approved, taking her views from her father who stayed to be 
 put in prison, while his brother stayed to be shot. Certainly 
 it seems a regular desertion of their posts, and what was 
 worst they jeered at as coivards those officers who did not 
 emigrate, sending them spindles and broken swords, till at 
 last they bullied them into following their example, and 
 leaving the King alone. His useless character seems to me 
 the only excuse for those who ran before it was necessary. 
 She said that when her mother, after the troubles, came back 
 to her estates (vineyards in Burgundy), she found the cellars 
 stocked with all the wine of the last few years which the 
 tenants had gone on making and putting by for her 
 against the time when she would come back and take it. All 
 the time the priests were taken away from them, they 
 assembled regularly twice every Sunday at church, and the 
 oldest read the service. She said that so it was in places (as 
 Auvergne) where the landlords were good as a class, but 
 where some were good and some bad, the good had to suffer 
 for it, with the bad. 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 8 Park Street : January 13, 1860. 
 
 I have nothing special to say since my last, except that I 
 have not much office work to do just at present, and so mean 
 to give the ' Guardian ' a help. 
 
 I met Sir Charles Macarthy yesterday, a clever fellow, 
 Colonial Secretary at Ceylon. He is just from Paris, where 
 he appears to have been living with the Orleanists, Thiers, 
 Cousin, &c., who are furious with Louis Napoleon for his 
 attack on the Pope. Considering that Louis Philippe was no 
 Churchman, and that Cousin and Thiers are probably both 
 unbelievers, of course the cry is a mere attempt at party 
 advantage. A French naval officer told him that there was a
 
 1860 MISSION TO PARIS 223 
 
 moment when an invasion of England might have been 
 possible, but that in a few months it became a most doubtful 
 possibility, and that now the very idea was ridiculous, that no 
 French naval officer would dream of viewing such a thing as 
 possible. Thiers declared that nobody had even thought of 
 it ; others (i.e. my friend, M. Mohl) nudged Macarthy and 
 told him that Thiers might say what he pleased, but did not 
 himself believe what he was saying. There were certain flat- 
 bottomed boats, said by Thiers to be built for navigating the 
 Loire ; by others, for the benefit of the English coast, which 
 was the main point in discussion. Love to all. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 F. ROGERS. 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 8 Park Street : February 14, 1860. 
 
 My work here seems to be leaving me just now. I have 
 been coming for the last few days, almost to go away again. 
 Before that I had a rush of work, owing to a hard and inter- 
 esting job, which has the effect always of keeping me at work 
 on itself for a week or so, and then piling up a heap of light 
 work to be disposed of when it is gone. But now all that is 
 cleared off; and at this moment, twelve o'clock, I have 
 absolutely nothing to do. My hard job was on the question 
 whether the natives of New Zealand should be managed by 
 the Home Government or handed over to the colonists, and 
 if the former, how ? a question well worth working at, and I 
 think I sent them a creditable report. I start with Merivale 
 a little against me. Of course I am for keeping the matter 
 for the present in the hands of people responsible to the 
 Crown. 
 
 Gladstone's speech seems to have been a great success 
 and his scheme is well spoken of in the City ; I suppose he 
 will carry it. But I have been very angry with the Govern- 
 ment for Sir G. C. Lewis's disgraceful mode of handing over 
 Bryan King to the mob. That he is an obstinate fellow is no 
 answer. 3 
 
 3 Mr. Bryan King had been Rector In 1856, on the question of Eucharistic 
 of St George's in the East since 1842. Vestments, and other matters of ritual,
 
 22 4 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vi 
 
 I was rather glad to find the other day that A. C. had 
 been much shocked by the profane abuse that the Ultramon- 
 tane papers are heaping on the French Emperor, and 
 one is glad to see in moderate Roman Catholics a tendency 
 to separate themselves from the firebrand party. The 
 thing that shocked her was a kind of parody of the Passion, 
 Louis Napoleon standing for Pilate, and his wife saying to 
 him, ' Have thou nothing to do with that just man ' (the Pope). 
 I believe there is a good deal of division among them on the 
 subject. 
 
 As far as we are concerned, I think the personal attitude 
 of the Irish Roman Catholic members gives us reason to wish 
 that the Pope had no temporal authority. Here are a number 
 of members who are going to vote steadily against the 
 Ministry, not because they think the Ministry have done 
 anything 'bad for England, not because they think badly of 
 their principles of foreign policy, but simply because they 
 give their vote with reference to the temporal advantage of a 
 foreign Prince, and not with regard to any other point of right 
 or wrong or any really religious principles of English policy 
 whatever. 
 
 Of course injustice is injustice, and it is not to be defended. 
 But certainly one may well wish that a state of things which 
 induces members of the Legislature to take such a line did 
 not exist. 
 
 he and his curates, Mr. Mackonochie some concessions (Life of Archbishop 
 
 and Mr. Loudon, were violently at- Tail, vol. i. p. 230 ; Loudon, Twenty- 
 
 tacked by the Evangelical Party. His one Years in St. George s Mission, p. 
 
 church from time to time during the 227). Sir G. Cornewall Lewis was 
 
 next few years became the scene of dis- Home Secretary, and so far answerable 
 
 graceful riots, Bishop Tail having in for the non-interference of the police, 
 vain tried to persuade Mr. King to make
 
 1860 225 
 
 CHAPTER VII 
 Under-Secretary for the Colonies, 1860 
 
 IN May 1860, Mr. Merivale was transferred from the Colonial 
 Office to the Secretaryship of the India Office, and Sir F. 
 Rogers was offered the post of permanent Under-Secretary 
 for the Colonies. With the Colonial administration, in which 
 for the next ten years he had so large a share, his experience 
 of fourteen years as an Emigration Commissioner had already 
 made him familiar. His chief, when he accepted this post, 
 was the Duke of Newcastle, Secretary of State for the 
 Colonies in Lord Palmerston's Ministry. 
 
 ' The Duke of Newcastle,' he writes, ' was an honest and 
 honourable man, a thorough gentleman in all his feelings and 
 ways, and considerate of all about him. To me he was 
 always kind. He was stiff, so that you would never say any- 
 thing to him because it came into your head. He respected 
 other people's position, but was sensible of his own ; and his 
 familiarity friendly enough was not such as invited a 
 response. It was said of him that he did not remember his 
 rank unless you forgot it, and the expression well hit off his 
 relations to subordinates. In political administration he was 
 painstaking, clear-headed and just. But his abilities were 
 moderate ; and he did not see how far they were from being 
 sufficient for the management of great affairs which, how- 
 ever, he was always ambitious of handling. It was said that 
 Peel looked to him as a future Premier, and it was thought 
 that the Duke expected it. The failure would have been 
 terrible, as was seen from his administration of the War 
 
 Q
 
 226 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vn 
 
 Office, where he showed himself unequal either to managing 
 affairs himself or to choosing confidential advisers who could 
 manage them for him. When the Duke of Newcastle died 
 in the year 1864, he was succeeded at the Colonial Office 
 by Mr. Cardwell. Cardwell was just and kind, clear- 
 headed and hard-headed, industrious, very accurate, and 
 enormously safe, especially in regard to matters of which the 
 House of Commons might have cognisance. In fact, he 
 seemed always to feel on his trial before the House of 
 Commons ; and I have occasionally felt that his dread of a 
 parliamentary scrape sometimes supplied the place of thorough 
 force of character. He had a fine instinctive sense of what 
 " would do " in that point of view, which made him invulne- 
 rable to specious fallacies in the opposite sense. And it is to 
 be remarked that in nine cases out of ten his guide would be 
 a true guide the House of Commons seeing in ordinary cases 
 what is not honest, or not for the public interest. He could 
 deal well with masses of business, and bring order out of dis- 
 order. He knew his own mind and worked steadily towards 
 his point ; but which was odd for a hard-headed man did 
 not always distinguish a plausible from a substantial result. 
 He took pains not to make enemies, and bore no ill-will to 
 his opponents.' 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 London : May 4, 1860. 
 
 My dear Kate, Very many thanks for your letter. I 
 am, as you see, installed here in Stephen's old armchair, and 
 have just had all the interviews with the senior clerks, telling 
 them about the division of business. We, Elliot and I, have 
 divided the work between us a good deal ; he taking North 
 America and Africa, and Mediterranean ; I taking Australia, 
 West Indies, Eastern Colonies, Ceylon, &c. I also taking 
 legal matters everywhere, and he military and convict 
 matters everywhere. But it remains to be seen how all this 
 will end. 
 
 F. R.
 
 1860 UNDER-SECRETARY FOR THE COLONIES 227 
 
 To Lady Rogers. 
 
 9 Ovington Square : June 17, 1860. 
 
 My dear Mother, Sunday, and I have had a day to my- 
 self, and this very wet Sunday I take the opportunity, like a 
 good boy, to give some account of myself. 
 
 The work goes on much as it did. I rather hope now for 
 a little relaxation of the storm, one or two important things 
 that have taken up time being, for the moment, disposed o f 
 But there is plenty ahead. Just now I am well off. I have 
 brought with me the only thing that had to be done when I 
 left the office on Saturday, and hope to have it done before I 
 leave for the office on Monday. I may consider while I am 
 walking down that I have my table clear. The satisfaction 
 of this is that I have gained rather than lost in my work. It 
 is not more than I can do, and 1 hope I do it well. This 
 however remains to be seen. You will have seen by the 
 papers that we have New Zealand troubles ahead. The 
 clergy of the English Church out there think us (the English) 
 in the wrong, I fear. But the official accounts, coming 
 through a Government well inclined to protect the natives, 
 seem to show that great care has been taken to keep us in 
 the right, and that we are so. He, the Governor, asks for 
 8,000 troops, which is of course absurd. However, you need not 
 say that. I see very little of the Duke [of Newcastle]. The 
 Duke works at home, comes down about three, is off to the 
 House of Lords about four, and probably has two or three 
 appointments in the meantime, so that it is very difficult to 
 catch him at all, and you must dispose of what you have to 
 say shortly and clearly when you do see him ; so far, perhaps, 
 no bad thing. But then, when a thing has to be passed in a 
 hurry, amended in progress, and so on, the absence of your 
 chief or his inaccessibility is worrying. However, he is very 
 ready to accept your conclusions, very clear in his own direc- 
 tions, and extremely careful (which I respect very highly) 
 never to throw back on a subordinate any shadow of respon- 
 sibility for advice that he has once accepted. I think I have 
 observed this in more than one thing. He is a good deal 
 brought to, I think, when his advisers differ, and rather 
 
 Q2
 
 228 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vn 
 
 catches at the notion of getting fresh advice, as if the bulk of 
 advice made it easier to decide, sometimes without seeing that 
 the advice he seeks is on his own principles less valuable than 
 what he has got. He is oddly dilatory about patronage, even 
 when he has substantially made up his mind (as I under- 
 stand) ; he seems to hesitate at making the plunge, and goes 
 on letting the idea simmer in his mind. Just now he is keep- 
 ing various Governors expectant in a state of anxiety. 
 
 I take it for granted that you know about G.'s Drawing 
 Room. She looked ' very nice,' as William (the footman) told 
 her. After having a good look at the side view (she sitting 
 in the middle of the drawing-room in a circle of beholders) he 
 did not content himself with it, like the more modest maid- 
 servants, but moved round to get a front view, looking in a 
 composed k'nd of way, as you would at a statue or a wild 
 beast, or anything inanimate or irrational, and then gave out 
 ' I am sure you couldn't look nicer, my lady.' Church and I 
 almost burst out laughing, but restrained ourselves till he had 
 got out of the room. Since that time he has asked to have a 
 boy under him. 
 
 To Lady Rogers. 
 
 January 29, 1861. 
 
 What do you think of the last from the United States ? 
 Sir E. Head ! read me a letter from an eminent Boston man 
 describing the state of things as hopeless. Fifteen Slave 
 States almost certain to go, and nobody knowing whom to 
 follow or what to do. ' There is anarchy in men's minds,' 
 he says. As showing what is going on, Sir E. H. showed 
 me an extract from a newspaper, being an address signed 
 by the Senate and Representatives of Maine and by 19,000 
 other persons, praying the Queen of England to effect the 
 annexation of Maine to Canada. And the Consul at 
 Boston writes to Engleheart that people there are talking of 
 New England uniting with Canada to form a kingdom 
 under a Prince of the Blood Royal. Think what the old 
 heroes of Bunker's Hill and the men who pitched their tea 
 into Boston Harbour would say to this, within a hundred 
 years of their liberation. 
 
 1 Governor-General of Canada.
 
 1861 UNDER-SECRETARY FOR THE COLONIES 229 
 
 However, don't talk of this, for though public in the 
 United States, our people here may not wish it talked of. 
 Head said that of course it must be all a lie, but that it was 
 impossible in the present state of things to disbelieve any- 
 thing. 
 
 To Lady Rogers. 
 
 Undated, apparently August 20, 1860. 
 
 G. will have told you that Chichester Fortescue, 1 being in 
 a great fright that his Bill (New Zealand) would be abandoned, 
 took me, as a bottle-holder, to an interview between himself 
 and Lord Palmerston. We were duly shown in, and found 
 his lordship writing and sealing letters, in the midst of such 
 a heap of papers, books &c., as I should have thought suffi- 
 cient to make the transaction of business impossible. He 
 set us down, finished his sealings, directions and so on, and 
 then sat himself down, put his hands between his knees and 
 assumed a kind of fixed resigned look, drooping his shoulders 
 and sinking his eyes like a man who was to undergo a 
 shower-bath. Then (it being understood that Palmerston 
 was in doubt about proceeding) Fortescue began, and, as I 
 should say, rehearsed his speech for the House, stating 
 the case and invoking me occasionally. Pam, when he had 
 done, put one or two (pretty searching) questions and listened 
 carefully to the answers (rather deaf). He said in a kind of 
 obedient way, ' Well, then, I have got my lesson ; and I shall 
 say that alterations will be made in the Bill that will remove 
 any of the objections, and that the Government will state the 
 
 1 Mr. Chichester Fortescue (Lord for Tuesday, August 21. But there 
 Carlingford) was then Parliamentary was opposition in Parliament and in 
 Under-Secretary for the Colonies. The New Zealand (chiefly in the southern 
 Bill, as introduced by the Duke of New- island), and on that day Lord Palmer- 
 castle in July 1860, was for the protec- ston announced that the Government 
 tion of the aborigines, to establish, by would not proceed with the Bill so late 
 imperial authority, a local council on in the Session. It was intended (see 
 which should devolve the revision of Times of April 20, 1861) to re-intro- 
 the native laws and the arrangements duce it next year, but the New Zealand 
 respecting the sale and purchase of Bill (passed in May 1861) dealt only 
 native land. This passed the House of with the division of the provinces in 
 Lords, and the second reading in the New Zealand. (See also p. 228.) 
 Commons was fixed (as this letter says)
 
 230 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vn 
 
 reasons for introducing it on Monday ' (now put off till Tues- 
 day), and then got up, and we got up and went off in our cab, 
 I had expected a kind of arguing and cross-examination, and 
 the whole thing was despatched by Pam in such a free and 
 easy way and with so little trouble to himself (except hearing 
 F.'s speech) that as soon as we got into the cab I burst into a 
 fit of laughter, in which F. joined. Then I asked, ' Well, what 
 do you think he thinks of you and your case ? ' ' Oh, I don't 
 know,' with an amused look. ' I would give something to 
 know. I should say his impression was that it would go down 
 with the House of Commons/ and then he laughed and said : 
 ' This is being behind the scenes.' He had quoted to Palmerston 
 with great force a passage in favour of his present proceedings 
 from a despatch of Lord Carnarvon's. ' Of course I shall read 
 that in the House/ as if that were the testimony of an enemy. 
 So when we got into the cab I told him that that despatch was 
 my writing, so that when the Whig Under-Secretary quotes the 
 Tory Under-Secretary in favour of the Whig measure it will be 
 in fact quoting Sir F. R.'s despatch as a hostile testimony to 
 the merits of Sir F. R.'s Bill. I told him this and he laughed and 
 said, ' Behind the scenes again.' He is very pleasant and un- 
 commonly plucky, for we have the whole world against us, 
 I can hardly believe even now that it will pass. It is fixed 
 for Tuesday evening. Sir J. Pakington and Adderley speak 
 against ; Lord Robert Cecil and Bethell (Attorney-General) for. 
 Bethell is quite keen and a valuable help. 
 
 To Rev. Edward Rogers. 
 
 Colonial Office : February 23, 1861. 
 
 I got an immense buttering from the Attorney-General 
 (Bethell) about that paper which I wrote at Blachford on 
 Ionian Consular Jurisdiction ' an admirable paper I can 
 assure you I mean what I say an admirable paper a perfect 
 knowledge of the subject very well put together and felici- 
 tously expressed complete as a Jurist a lawyer and ' (some 
 word implying the political treatment of the subject). He 
 harped rather on the ' Jurist ' part of the matter, which is a 
 character I rather ambition. He took occasion to explain to 
 me ' there is jus. t,ex, and forum. Jus is the principles of
 
 1861 UNDER-SECRETARY FOR THE COLONIES 231 
 
 natural justice, especially as embodied in international law. 
 Lex, the written law defining offences and rights. Forum, the 
 mode of procedure and jurisdiction of courts.' 
 
 I really shall soon begin to think that V.'s friend was right 
 and that I am a profound lawyer, or at any rate that, by a 
 judicious amount of silence and a judicious choice of occasions 
 for lecturing, I may support that character. 
 
 To Lady Rogers. 
 
 April 12, 1 86 1. 
 
 What do you think of the Cooly business turning up again ? 
 I was called on yesterday by a delegate from Reunion, who is in 
 London trying to push things through. I am amused to see 
 how ' the cat jumps.' This Reunion man is full of concessions, 
 has the firmest reliance on English good faith, &c., &c. At 
 one of his proposals, however, I asked, ' Qu'est-ce qu'en diront 
 MM. les Delegues des Antilles ?' when out came the truth. 
 Reunion, being close to India, and seeing what has happened 
 in Mauritius, wants coolies and cares little about Africa ; the 
 Antilles, being far from India, wants Africans and cares little 
 comparatively about coolies ; consequently the Reunionists 
 are hot to push the treaty through (having already got five 
 ship-loads), while the Antilles abuse us and it, and would stop 
 it if they could. Now this Reunion man appears to have got 
 hold of the French and Foreign Office, and I dare say will 
 push it through. 
 
 To Lady Rogers. 
 
 May 10, 1861. 
 
 I have just been interrupted by a little M. Imhausen, 
 ' Delegue de 1'ile de Reunion,' who has come over to push the 
 Cooly Treaty, which seems approaching a conclusion (as it 
 has seemed for the last two years), and prays me to restore 
 him to his family (now in Paris) by expediting matters. 
 ' Vous me rendrez a ma famille,' with an affectionate enthu- 
 siasm, and then enlists my sympathy by appealing to my 
 paternity. ' Vous, Monsieur, qui etes le pere de ce traite ; 
 on 1'appelle toujours dans les departements de Paris le traite 
 Rogers.' I can't say I wish to ride down to posterity on the 
 back of that convention. It is enough to have ridden it into 
 the Colonial Office, and now I should like to change my horse.
 
 232 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vii 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 Nov. 1861. 
 
 My dear Kate, War in earnest, I am afraid. 2 Sir E. 
 Head has just been here talking about what is doing to put 
 Canada in a state of defence. They are proceeding just as if 
 war was declared, as far as preparations go. You see the 
 Yankees have dealt us their slap in the face just as the St. 
 Lawrence is frozen up and New Brunswick covered with snow, 
 so that it is not so easy to say how anything ought to be sent. 
 
 The only hope is that the bankers and substantial men in 
 the U.S. may be strong enough to send Seward to the right- 
 about, and then knock under. But it is much more probable 
 that before our mission arrives they will have committed them- 
 selves too deeply to recede or at any rate to recede in double 
 quick time which I apprehend we shall demand. 
 
 Of course Canada is in danger, but a few thousand English 
 soldiers (and there are a few thousand in the North American 
 provinces) will do a great deal till more come. I hear Col. 
 Lysons is likely to be sent however, don't talk of that till you 
 see it I hope he is fit for real work. 
 
 Pam goes about saying he is not going to be bullied, and 
 I suppose is not. Mr. Slidell says that the lieutenant who 
 boarded the ' Trent ' said, ' Oh, John Bull would do as he had 
 done before, he would bark, but not bite.' 
 
 They say the lieutenant who had to seize Slidell and Mason 
 was a Southerner, who had been dining with them at Havannah, 
 which accounts for his saying that it was the most disagree- 
 able job he ever had. 
 
 The American proceedings, as a matter of policy, seem to 
 me so wild that I cannot but half think that Seward feels 
 himself going (they talk of very strong opposition growing 
 up to him), and wishes to be turned out on the ground of 
 affronting England ; in which case, of course, he would go out 
 
 - Slidell and Mason, the Commis- in November 1861. The Guards were 
 sioners from the Southern Confederate sent to Canada, but the American Go- 
 States, were taken by force by Captain vernment gave up the commissioners, 
 Wilkes, of the American Navy, from the and the danger of war passed. 
 British West India Mail Steamer ' Trent,'
 
 1861 UNDER-SECRETARY FOR THE COLONIES 233 
 
 as a mob hero with a capital chance of coming back again on 
 mob shoulders, saying that all the mischief had been done 
 while and because he was out of office. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 F. R. 
 
 To Lady Rogers. 
 
 March 4, 1862. 
 
 We had a pleasant Sunday (as we always have) with the 
 Taylors. I like him more and more. He certainly has an 
 enjoyment in being considerably unlike everybody else, more 
 perhaps like a Capuchin friar than any other animal. 
 
 He amused me by an anecdote of Lord Melbourne. In 
 his (Lord M.'s) Cabinet, Lord Grey (then Howick) was object- 
 ing after his manner to everybody's draft of a proposed 
 certain despatch, and at last Lord M. pushed a sheet of paper 
 to him, and said, ' Well, then, in God's name try your own 
 hand upon it' Lord Howick wrote a sentence, then altered 
 it, then expunged it, then crunched up the paper and threw it 
 down, then da capo with another sheet of paper, all which Lord 
 Melbourne allowed him to do for some time without interrup- 
 tion, and when he came to a short pause struck in with ' Ah, 
 I thought so you see now, when you have nobody to contra- 
 dict but yourself, you are done.' Not a bad Cabinet interior. 
 I told Taylor I did not know whether I wished to be again 
 under Lord Grey, and he said, ' Oh, depend upon it, you would 
 like it very much. I should like excessively to see you 
 together. You would get on admirably now.' . . . The last 
 thing almost I have been upon is a ponderous quarrel between 
 
 the Governor and the Bishop of , in the course 
 
 of which the Bishop, thinking himself insulted, told the 
 Governor that he would have to answer for it to a ' Higher 
 Power.' The Governor, a soldier, taking it for granted he 
 meant the Duke of Newcastle, proceeded at once to lay the 
 matter before the Executive Council, in order to appear with 
 fresh support beiore his Grace, and in a subsequent de- 
 spatch informed us in a tone of something like complaint that 
 his Lordship 'now says that when he referred to a " Higher 
 Power " he did not mean that he would report me to your 
 Grace, but that God would judge me,' evidently not quite per-
 
 234 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vn 
 
 suaded in his mind that the explanation was not an after- 
 thought. 
 
 These quarrels often make me think what a capital post 
 a Roman Proconsul had. ' If it were a matter of wrong, 
 reason would that I should bear with you. But if it be a 
 question of words and of your law, see ye to it, for I will be 
 judge of no such thing, and he drave them from the judgment 
 seat. And the Jews took Sosthenes and beat him. But 
 Gallic cared for none of these things.' I wish we could afford 
 to wink at the Governor and Bishop horse-whipping each 
 other. As far as I see, it would do both of them good, and I 
 shall get the Duke to go as near it as ever I can with due re- 
 gard to his character. 
 
 To the Bishop of Oxford? 
 
 June 30, 1862. 
 
 My dear Lord Bishop, I am rather afraid of being mis- 
 understood about your Bill, a copy of which has just reached 
 me. 
 
 I, of course, think it is a just claim of the English Church 
 to be allowed to consecrate Missionary Bishops, and as a 
 Churchman I shall be extremely glad if your particular Bill 
 passes as it stands. 
 
 But I think that in your Bill the State is entitled to take 
 this objection the Bill proposes to invest a Bishop in a 
 Mahomedan country say of Mecca with a statutory rela- 
 tion to the Church of England, that is to say, to attach him 
 remotely, but really, to the constitution of this country. of 
 which the Church is a part. 
 
 Now, this Bishop of Mecca is not a mere Bishop of English 
 congregations, but a Missionary Bishop bound in that capacity 
 to make war upon Mahomedanism, which is, on the other 
 hand, part of the political constitution of the Ottoman 
 Empire. 
 
 Now, the Ottoman Empire having been to a certain extent 
 
 admitted into the family of nations, is it according to the 
 
 comity of nations that the English Parliament should take 
 
 under its wing an organised attack on the constitution of 
 
 3 Bishop Wilberforce.
 
 1862 UNDER-SECRETARY FOR THE COLONIES 235 
 
 that Empire ? The Pope, no doubt, does it in England, but 
 first he does it under shelter of certain principles of tolera- 
 tion, which we profess, and which it appears to me are suffi- 
 cient to cover his aggression ; and next we, notwithstanding, 
 quarrel with him for doing it. 
 
 You will answer that the Crown may, under your Bill, 
 prevent any such complications by refusing its assent to the 
 creation of any Bishopric which is calculated to cause them. 
 
 This is one of those answers which is good or bad accord- 
 ing to the animus of the person to whom it is addressed. 
 A rash or careless Minister may authorise the erection of an 
 Anglican Bishopric in a place where its erection would be 
 politically unjustifiable. The question is whether the advan- 
 tage (of setting the Church going in a missionary direction) 
 justifies the risk of an ill-advised appointment causing a com- 
 plication with a foreign country. 
 
 Personally, I think it does (and therefore wish well to 
 your Bill), but if I held the well-being of the English Church 
 a matter of little importance to this country I should think 
 differently, and should think that the Parliament had a right 
 to some more distinct guarantee (to speak as a politician) 
 against the abuse of the powers of consecration. 
 
 Even personally I prefer our colonial principle of pro- 
 ceeding, the principle, namely, of leaving Bishops to consecrate 
 in virtue of their inherent spiritual powers, and leaving the 
 consecrating and consecrated to arrange for themselves what 
 shall be their relations to each other. In this case, the State 
 is subject to no responsibility (colonial Bishops being no part 
 of the Constitution), and is therefore entitled to no control 
 over the missionary operations of the Church. 
 
 I should therefore have liked best to see a Bill (though 
 it would have been perhaps very difficult to draw one) which 
 would merely have permitted the Church to create an 
 Episcopate beyond the limits of the Queen's Dominions, 
 leaving the relations of that Episcopate to be formed by 
 mutual consent without any statutory aid or the necessity of 
 any Royal assent. 4 
 
 4 Some account of the accomplishment of this will be found at the end of 
 Chapter viii.
 
 236 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vn 
 
 But I repeat, in default of this, I should consider your Bill 
 as likely to be of great advantage, and wish it success. 
 
 Yours sincerely, 
 
 F. ROGERS. 
 
 To Hon. Mrs. H. Legge. 
 
 Venice : October 13, 1862. 
 
 Rainy journey to Milan, rainy morning at Milan rainy 
 journey to Padua. Then we had a beautiful morning to look 
 at Padua, which is not, I think, sufficiently highly rated the 
 famous Giotto frescoes are, of course, valued properly. They 
 are the only Giottos that I really feel myself to appreciate. And 
 they derive great interest from the fact that Dante was with him 
 while he painted them, and that from the style of their beauty 
 Dante might have painted them himself there is that curious 
 mixture of beautiful finish in essentials (in D. harmony of 
 verse, appropriateness of language, and precision of thought) 
 with a rude carelessness of conventionality when it interferes 
 with the vigorous expression of an idea, which seems to me 
 characteristic of Dante, or (what is partly the same thing) 
 a power of realising a conception and putting his whole mind 
 and soul into the expression of it. I should like to see 
 (except that they would be so entirely spoilt by being taken 
 out of the context) a series of heads of our Saviour taken from 
 these frescoes. They would in themselves almost be a r&umJ 
 of the Gospel. Two which are almost contiguous are, I think, 
 the most impressive : the expression of our Saviour receiving 
 Judas's kiss, and of our Saviour telling the women of Jerusalem 
 to weep for themselves. The first is like the sentence of the 
 Last Judgment ; our Saviour seems to look through and through 
 Judas. It is an habitually sad face, but there is no emotion of 
 sorrow ; it is simply piercing and unrelenting as if there was 
 no use in thinking of what might have been, respecting a man 
 whose day of mercy was past. I could fancy Dante suggest- 
 ing the treatment and sitting by dissatisfied with the sketches 
 till his idea was exactly realised. The other is all tenderness ; 
 the expression of sorrow for their sorrow, and of seeing what 
 was coming upon them more clearly than they did themselves, 
 is perfect and beautiful, and also (I should say) quite Dan-
 
 1862 UNDER-SECRETARY FOR THE COLONIES 237 
 
 tesque. Still more so the raising of Lazarus Lazarus stand- 
 ing straight up, ghastly and surprised, like a ghost in swaddling 
 clothes (tied hand and foot), the two sisters crawling (I 
 really can hardly use any other expression) at our Saviour's 
 feet. On the whole it is a most interesting sight if you stay 
 long enough before it, as in some slight degree we did. 
 
 The city is beautiful from the number of old palaces in 
 decadence, and the profusion of colonnades supported not on 
 piers but slight marble columns ; and a shrine of St. Antonio is, 
 I think, about the most beautiful thing of its kind I ever saw. 
 I wonder it is not more praised. There is a certain reflection 
 of Venice in Padua (substituting colonnades for canals) which 
 makes it also interesting. The type is similar, and it strikes 
 me, as I write, that part of what I most admire in St. Antonio's 
 shrine it has in common with St. Mark's. 
 
 To Sir George Grey?* 
 
 Colonial Office : November 26, 1862. 
 
 My dear Sir George, I inclose a letter from Wirima 
 Repa 6 to his grandfather, which perhaps you will be good 
 enough to forward to its destination. I inclose also the copy 
 of a letter from Captain Tremlett, in whose charge he is, which 
 appears to be satisfactory. We are somewhat puzzled to 
 know what to do next with the boy. At present he is in the 
 ' Impregnable ' in the harbour at Devonport, with two or three 
 hundred boys who are in training for the Royal Navy ; he is 
 looked after by one of the petty officers, with whom he messes ; 
 he is clothed differently from the rest, and has one or two 
 privileges, and a certain amount of private and pocket money. 
 Captain Tremlett represents him as anxious to learn English 
 (our main point just at present), affectionate, but rather morti- 
 fied if not a little passionate when anything is refused him, 
 fond of dress and of games of chance, holding himself aloof 
 from the other boys (which is perhaps as well), pleased with 
 notice and generally contented. 
 
 * Then Governor of New Zealand. placed at the disposal of the Queen. 
 
 6 Wirima Repa was the grandson of a As will be seen by the following letters, 
 Maori chief, who wished the boy to be the poor boy's life was short.
 
 238 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vn 
 
 This does tolerably well for the present, but he is said not 
 to fancy the sea and to show some turn for drawing and 
 machinery. It seems to us here that it might be very useful, 
 if possible, after two or three years to send him back to New 
 Zealand, with some such knowledge and habits as would 
 render him useful to his countrymen. But there is great diffi- 
 culty in finding a place in which he will acquire these, when 
 he has outgrown the ' Impregnable,' i.e. when he can write 
 and read English a little and speak it fairly well. 
 
 It is rather late to ask you the question, but it would much 
 assist in dealing with the boy if we knew your views about 
 him, and particularly what teaching would be likely to make 
 him most useful in New Zealand when he gets back a little 
 surveying, mechanics, working in wood or iron, agriculture, 
 navigation ? 
 
 I am afraid he will hardly be advanced enough in English 
 to raise these further questions before we get an answer from 
 you to this letter. 
 
 Believe me yours very truly, 
 
 F. R. 
 
 To Rev. Dr. Lowe? 
 
 December 13, 1862. 
 
 Dear Sir, Mr. Mozley informs me that I may communi- 
 cate with you respecting a young New Zealander who has 
 been sent to England by his grandfather, one of the principal 
 chiefs on the English side, or, rather, beyond comparison the 
 most important and trustworthy friend we have ; and whom 
 the Duke of Newcastle wishes to send back to his country, 
 after two or three years' residence here, with something of 
 European knowledge and improvement. 
 
 He is a lad of sixteen or seventeen years of age. I should 
 think, both from what I saw and from what I hear of him, 
 that he was susceptible of kindness, and that he had much 
 quickness of observation (as to such things as flowers, family 
 likeness, simple mechanical contrivances, &c.). He speaks 
 (or spoke in last September) very broken English, but under- 
 stood fairly those to whom he was accustomed ; he was 
 
 7 Headmaster of Hurstpierpoint School.
 
 1862 UNDER-SECRETARY FOR THE COLONIES 239 
 
 inclined to be contented and to form attachments (probably 
 not very strong ones). I hear he is anxious to learn, fond of 
 dress, and that he stands somewhat on his dignity which is 
 as well, seeing he is at present among a set of boys picked 
 up anywhere, being educated for seamen. 
 
 When I saw him he could write a little, but, strange to 
 say, could not read. He was also inclined to try his hand a 
 little at drawing. So much for the boy. 
 
 What I should be very glad to ascertain is whether you 
 think you could take him in hand, what you would propose 
 to do with him, who would be his associates, whether the 
 place is healthy (a very important point), and what would be 
 your terms. 
 
 The difficulty, I suppose, would be in assigning to any 
 class a boy so big and so untrained. My own general notion 
 would be to teach him first reading, writing, arithmetic, and 
 manners ; then some useful art for which he showed a taste 
 (I mean not so much the manual aptitude as the principles 
 and rationale of it, so that he would bring his own knowledge 
 to bear on his countrymen) ; neatness of hand, such as it may 
 be, together with something or other for which he may show 
 special aptitude in the way of accomplishments, say a little 
 physical science, history, drawing, and music anything, in 
 short, that it was possible to hope that he would pursue for 
 his own amusement, and with which in after years he might 
 infect his wife and children. 
 
 Yours, 
 F. R. 
 
 To Lady Rogers (Lady Blachford]. 
 
 Clumber: January 2, 1863. 
 
 I duly arrived here about five o'clock, having fallen in 
 with the Reeves. 
 
 The dinner party were the Reeves, a Colonel and Mrs. 
 Sherwin Gregory (neighbours), and myself. The next day 
 were added the Speaker (Denison), and Venables a clever 
 pleasant fellow whom you may know by name. 
 
 I have spent my leisure time in walking (declining a gun) 
 partly alone, partly with Venables, partly with the ladies
 
 2 4 o LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vn 
 
 and men shooters. Yesterday a dull day, made the place 
 look dull. To-day is beautiful, and makes the place produce 
 a different impression. It is very ducal, and much what you 
 might expect. The country is made up of low undulations 
 at a slight gradient the top of the hills or ridges not being 
 higher than the top of a good-sized house. Along one of the 
 valleys runs a stream (which becomes ultimately the Idle), 
 which has been stopped up in one place and widened, for, say, 
 a mile and a half, into a lake ; the banks are wooded, and 
 planted park-like fashion ; and close on one side of the water 
 is Clumber, a heavy house with stately terraces running down 
 to the water. 
 
 The rooms are very grand ; library beautiful ; drawing- 
 room and dining-room to match. The drawing-room, recently 
 furnished with white satin walls and sky-blue curtains for 
 the Prince of Wales, is certainly very stately and fine ; so 
 are the plate, the statues, the horses and carriages, and the 
 pictures. But it is all a kind of George III. grandeur 
 imposing without much interest. The Duke yesterday 
 lionised us over house and grounds, which are all of a piece ; 
 a characteristic picture hanging in the hall gives a key to a 
 good deal. The picture is of horsemen, gamekeepers, and 
 dogs, and it comprises the great-grandfathers of the present 
 Duke, of the present Duke's gamekeeper, of his assistant 
 gamekeeper, the ancestors of his spaniels (the Clumber breed, 
 who will not thrive anywhere else), and the ancestors of his 
 pointers. In fact, everything but the horses appears to have 
 been hereditary. 
 
 To Lady Rogers (Lady Blachford}. 
 
 Clumber : January 4, 1 863. 
 
 The Duke is anxious to be friendly and to do all his 
 duties to tenants, neighbours, friends, &c. kindly, I fancy, 
 to real intimates, or in matters which call for real feeling, 
 but in the matter of the ' small change ' of feeling, what 
 small talk is to conversation, he is somewhat depourvu. 
 
 I think I described the place. It is very characteristic of 
 the possessor. Very little natural advantages, a reasonably 
 nice river stream, low slopes, indifferent timber all swollen
 
 1863 UNDER-SECRETARY FOR THE COLONIES 241 
 
 into a sheet of water and spacious park by their connexion 
 with the dukedom. The house ducal, the talk ducal, the 
 dinner ducal ; the collection of silks, satins, and diamonds in 
 the large drawing-room with satin hangings, after dinner, 
 strikingly ducal. It rather decidedly impressed me in its 
 pompous way, the more so because there was no large party, 
 but merely a few persons looking magnificent, and as if it 
 was not necessary that they should be a large party. Not, 
 so far, the kind of thing I like, but the kind of thing to look 
 at as a stage play. 
 
 I renewed my acquaintance with Venables, a clever fellow, 
 whom I knew at Cambridge, and who writes the political 
 articles of the ' Saturday Review.' A fellow of a clear, calm, 
 rather biting turn of mind, and no nonsense, whom I intend 
 to cultivate. A thorough Liberal, I imagine. I also met the 
 Reeves ; he is the editor of the ' Edinburgh/ who knows 
 everybody, has seen a good deal, and consequently has a 
 good deal to say which is amusing to hear. I picked up a 
 fair amount of their little odds and ends, which are pleasant to 
 hear but hardly worth writing, and not very easy to remember. 
 
 One thing amused me from hardly knowing whether it 
 was a passage of arms or not. The clerks of the Privy Coun- 
 cil were Charles Greville and William Bathurst, The place 
 is, of course, one of importance. When Lord Derby came in, 
 as Reeves told us, Charles Greville declared he would never 
 attend the Council till the Conservatives went out, and so 
 put it off on William Bathurst, who delighted in the dignity 
 of attending. 'Ah,' said the Duke, more inclined, I imagine, 
 to side with the Conservative Peer Premier than with the 
 Liberal official ' You know how Derby took that. He said, 
 " What on earth can you suppose it signifies to me what 
 footman brings up the coal-scuttle when I ring the bell ? " 
 
 I did not think it necessary to consider whether I was 
 bound to appropriate any part of the indignity, and so only 
 chuckled. 
 
 The Duke said, to report a somewhat improper sentiment, 
 that one of our Ministers had complained to Louis Napoleon 
 that he was playing fast and loose with us ; to which Louis 
 Napoleon replied : ' I can assure you I wish nothing better 
 
 R
 
 242 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vn 
 
 than to be faithful to England as my wife. I must confess I 
 like to have another power from time to time as my mistress.' 
 There is something for us to make what we can of, considering 
 the nature and habits of the man. Love to all. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 F. R. 
 
 To Rev. Dr. Lowe. 
 
 February 13, 1863. 
 
 Dear Sir, I have not written to you on the subject of 
 Wirima Repa the New Zealander, partly on account of his 
 illness, which has frightened us, lest we should be obliged to 
 send him back to New Zealand. At present he is better, and 
 I think it possible we may be able to keep him over the 
 summer, sending him back in October or thereabouts ; another 
 winter here would be plainly imprudent. The fear is of con- 
 sumption he has been troubled with cough &c., and an 
 obstinate sore in his leg, now better, but apparently more or 
 less constitutional. This may affect your readiness to take 
 charge of him for a few months. And it may still make it 
 impossible to send him to Hurstpierpoint. But I will write 
 to you again on the subject unless I hear from you that what 
 I have now said makes it impossible for you to take him. 
 We should be glad to place him in your hands, if you were 
 ready to take him and his health appeared to allow of it In 
 answer to one of your questions, he is a Christian, and a good 
 docile, reverent one, fond of reading his Bible (in Maori), and 
 not without desire to be a missionary on the understanding, 
 however, that this is not to interfere with his fighting the 
 Waikatos, for which also he has a taste. 
 
 What his capacity is I do not know, but he is evidently 
 extremely amiable and affectionate. He has a good deal of 
 quiet dignity when with the other boys on the ' Impregnable,' 
 who are not, and whom he feels not to be, his equals their 
 principal point of contact being the game of draughts, in 
 which he excels. He now, I am told, understands English 
 perfectly, but does not speak with ease. 
 
 Yours faithfully, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS.
 
 1863 UNDER-SECRETARY FOR THE COLONIES 243 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 March 18, 1863. 
 
 My dear Kate, It seems an age since I have written 
 what can really be called a letter to Blachford, and now I 
 have an idle morning just fit for the purpose. I had a very 
 sharp touch of work from the latter end of last month ; since 
 that time I have had, what in the ordinary course of things 
 would be easy work ; but there have been a few blank days, 
 more or less of holidays, which, though easing the work as 
 far as comfort was concerned, kept me in a sense pretty well 
 employed. (Drawing-room Princess Alexandra journeying 
 to Hurstpierpoint.) 
 
 I suppose G. will have told you all about the two first. 
 The last was a journey to an institution on High Church 
 principles for middle-class education, to which we shall send 
 young Wirima Repa. It is just the place for him a collegiate 
 building in a high healthy situation, with 300 boys of different 
 ages ; a cheery, good-hearted head-master and wife who will 
 notice the boy ; a kind of pupil-teacher, who can be more 
 or less told off for him ; the run of the country (no bounds) ; 
 and, what he will much delight in, a rifle-corps in the school, 
 which will have to appear at a review on Easter Monday or 
 Tuesday. The head-master's wife was a Miss Coleridge, and 
 will therefore have aboriginal tendencies, being cousin to 
 Patteson, the Bishop of Melanesia. 
 
 My employment during the end of February was in a great 
 measure the drafting a long New Zealand despatch which was 
 moved for by Adderley in the House of Commons before it 
 was sent off in a great measure before it was written and 
 which may make a row here and there. I may almost say it has 
 been written three times ; first, a year or so ago, next in January 
 last, and thirdly in February last. The Duke of N. criticised 
 the January version as too didactic ' like what they find fault 
 with in Stephen but better ' a compliment with which I was 
 not ill-pleased whatever it may be worth. Then it went 
 through a revision of my own in consequence of fresh news 
 from New Zealand, then a revision by Fortescue, all of which 
 took a good deal of the sting out of it, and, I half think, a little 
 
 R 2
 
 244 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vn 
 
 the coherency. It remains, however, a complete treatise. 
 Fortescue read it all to the Duke and myself in its final form 
 for approval, and I was disappointed with it. Then I read it 
 myself and liked it better. What the rest of the world will 
 say to it I do not know. I think I shall send it to you when 
 it comes out (though in itself it is not a kind of thing that 
 would interest you) as the most elaborate ' State paper ' I 
 have yet produced. 
 
 The truth is that I doubt whether it ought to appear in 
 the form of a despatch at all. It is rather an attempt to 
 obtain from public opinion in England support against the 
 public opinion of New Zealand which ought by rights to be 
 got by a speech in the House of Commons. But to say the 
 truth, I don't feel that I could get my own views (such as 
 they are) well before the world in that way, and, as I attach a 
 certain amount of importance to them, I have put them out 
 in this way at the risk of making the Duke look like a lecturer. 
 I hope, however, that this will not be the effect. For the 
 New Zealanders have happily given me lots of handles for all 
 that I wanted to say, so that, though I may be tedious, I can 
 hardly be accused of being uncalled for. Also the occasion 
 is an important one a regular turning-point, in regard to 
 colonial policy as regards military defence of colonies. 
 
 We have been getting through Kinglake's ' Crimea,' which 
 of course you will get in due time from Mudie. It is exces- 
 sively entertaining ; his sketches of character are admirably 
 amusing, especially when you know the men (Gladstone, Duke 
 of Newcastle, and Lord Stratford) and can separate the 
 genuinely good hits from views which have more or less an 
 ingenious partiality or caricature. 
 
 I think, however, it is what I should call a wicked book. 
 First it does not admit of war as a terrible necessity, but 
 rather writes it up as a noble amusement like fox-hunting. 
 At least, this is to me the spirit of the book. Next it is a 
 reckless attack on the French Empire, that is ''in spite of all 
 his efforts to make a distinction), on the French nation. His 
 friends say that he feels that, knowing the truth, a duty is laid 
 on him to speak it. But there are many ways of speaking 
 the truth, and the policy of the book with regard to the French
 
 1863 UNDER-SECRETARY FOR THE COLONIES 245 
 
 is a cold bitter desire to sting, rising, with regard to the 
 Emperor and his generals, to a burning hatred and desire to 
 destroy. All this is put but with the most finished possible 
 deliberation, the author being evidently quite careless of the 
 effect it may produce in engendering bitter and angry feelings 
 between England and France, and desirous if possible of 
 inflaming the French feeling against Louis Napoleon, with- 
 out (I must believe) any distinct view as to what is to happen 
 as a consequence of this inflammation. 
 
 His monster account of the battle of the Alma is as 
 interesting almost as a novel (if you deliver yourself up to it), 
 but it requires very careful reading, and is provoking from 
 the long deliberate episodes which he inflicts upon you 
 sometimes in the very crisis of affairs. I should call it very 
 instructive in a military point of view to a non-military reader, 
 i.e. (like William Greig's account of the Battle of Waterloo) 
 it gives you by its detail a real comprehension of the 
 value of lots of things, which in ordinary military histories 
 you see stated roughly and have to take for granted, as 
 matters of tactics or military detail, which an unprofessional 
 reader has to pass over in faith. Colonel Hood's manoeuvre 
 appears very clearly. 
 
 On a careless reading the whole will (I should think) 
 appear a mass of confusion. But this is only from the 
 tremendously complicated task which he has undertaken. 
 And with care you can get at a distinct idea how (in his view) 
 each separate regiment (almost) of the French and English 
 army acted, and how all their proceedings bore upon each 
 other. But then you have to study 300 pages. I should think 
 that you must take at least two or three times as long to 
 read the account as it took the armies to fight the battle. 
 Then, to be sure, they were 100,000 men and you are only one. 
 Love to all. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 F. R. 
 
 To Lady Rogers. 
 
 Summer, 1863. 
 
 I suppose G. or somebody told you how Wirima Repa 
 went down to Osborne to see the Queen, very ill, poor fellow,
 
 246 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vn 
 
 and of course with much fatigue, and came back delighted 
 with his opportunity, but in a state of dignified disgust with 
 his countrymen 8 who went down with him, and who, from his 
 account, would seem to have drunk more than was good for 
 them, and made more noise than was by any means to be 
 desired. The Princesses showed the Maori women over 
 their own private rooms, and the Queen had Wirima in for 
 a little talk after she had disposed of the rest, and finally sent 
 them all (him inclusive) a little autograph of her own, her 
 signature and the date of the visit, on note paper with a 
 black border about an inch broad a pleasant memento 
 enough for an affectionate boy. Altogether the visit was 
 a great success having been a great object which is not 
 always the case. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 F. R. 
 
 To Lady Rogers. 
 
 September i, 1863. 
 
 I had a very pleasant day at Birmingham, though I look 
 back at it as you do at some exciting novel I hardly know 
 with more pleasure or pain. Newman was, of course, ex- 
 tremely affectionate, asking after you all, and hearing with 
 interest all I had to say (I delivered your message and 
 Sophy's), and going back with great pleasure and feeling to 
 all recollections of old times, conversations &c. But I 
 cannot express the melancholy feeling which the whole view 
 of his situation (with Ward's comments) has left on my mind. 
 There he is almost alone in a large house with none of his 
 old friends about him, overworked, and that in a way which 
 is not his own line not what he had expected or planned 
 for himself or for which he seemed fitted, thrown away by 
 the communion to which he has devoted himself, and 
 evidently sensible that he is so thrown away. He talked 
 freely as if it were old times again about his former and 
 present plans the translation of the Bible, which for a time 
 was committed to him and then fell out of his hands a 
 
 s These were some Maories, who fered, and arranged for their entertain- 
 had been brought over by a speculating ment, and for their return to their own 
 showman. The Colonial Office inter- country.
 
 1863 UNDER-SECRETARY FOR THE COLONIES 247 
 
 project of writing on ' Reason and Faith ' his school 
 projects of Catholic University and the question (which 
 divides them) whether it is better to effect, if possible, a 
 lodgment in Oxford or Cambridge, which is his view, or to 
 set up a separate University, which is Manning's, and the 
 majority's and the inability of his own people to understand 
 what a University in his sense of the word (derived from 
 Oxford) really is. He set me criticising his beginnings towards 
 a church, and, though there is much I did not like, I happily 
 hit more than once on a thing to admire warmly, which made 
 him stop and look at me hard in his old amused way and 
 ask, ' Now, do you really mean what you say ? ' ' Certainly.' 
 ' Because, my dear Rogers, that is my own.' And once or 
 twice, after talks of this kind (quite in the old way) as we 
 were walking rather quickly from place to place, he leading 
 the way, and so, not talking, he was left to follow his own 
 thoughts for a moment, I caught a kind of impatient and 
 half mournful ' Ah, tzt ' (you know the sound, though I can't 
 spell it), which seemed to say, ' Why is he not with me, why 
 can't I be often talking to him in this way ? ' Then we 
 talked about various matters, Birmingham habits, Birming- 
 ham villas, architecture, Ward and his eccentricities (I saw, 
 sitting with Newman and his two followers, that a joke at 
 Ward's expense was not unacceptable, and it was a pleasure to 
 get a good hearty laugh out of him in the old fashion). He 
 gave me the whole day (dismissing rather shortly Lord Henry 
 Kerr, who dropped in) but evidently did not desire that I 
 should come again on Monday, so I started by an earlier 
 train (9.30) and got here in time to do a little work. 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 1 8 Radnor Place : October 10, 1863. 
 
 My dear Kate. Our Maori proceedings have been some- 
 what strange and perplexing. In the first place you know 
 that we were told that Wirima would start on Wednesday 
 morning, then this was put off to Thursday, and luckily 
 for poor Wirima frightfully overwalked himself (being left 
 alone for a short walk), came here hardly able to stand, and
 
 248 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORU CH. vn 
 
 at 1 1 o'clock, when I went into his bedroom to see that he 
 was all right, we found him suffering so much that we sent for 
 the doctor, who at once poulticed him and dosed him for an 
 attack of pleurisy. Next day he was better, but hardly thought 
 himself able to see Mr. and Mrs. Pomare. 9 However, I forced 
 them on him (in his bedroom) ; his coming to luncheon was 
 out of the question, and at last it was agreed that Mr. Pomare 
 should stay with him and see him off. So we were at once 
 saddled with 6 feet 3 of savage, in addition to poor W. 
 However the six feet three packed themselves up on an arm- 
 chair. He seems to have looked after him very nicely, 
 though I was rather alarmed to see the window left open all 
 night upon a pleuritic patient (the alternative was being 
 baked), and on the next (Thursday) morning he was far 
 better. The doctor thought, not only that he was fit to 
 embark (which we had doubted), but that the voyage would 
 do him more good than anything else could do him, and that 
 there was really a chance of his reaching New Zealand. 
 Well, on Thursday morning off I started with my two Maories 
 to the Emigration Office 
 
 But on arriving in the City I was informed that the ship's 
 surgeon (the very point on which we were particular) had 
 cried off, that the ship could not start till the next day, and 
 that W.'s cabin (a very good one, I understand) would not be 
 ready for him until then. So what was to be done? 
 
 Of course all things are possible, though all things are 
 not convenient ; and the question was whether to go back, 
 which would have been to W.'s great disappointment, for he 
 was keen to get on board. However, at last, I settled to put 
 them into the hands of the Emigration officer a kind 
 sensible fellow, who would take them to Gravesend, bed 
 them there, put them on board the next morning. ... I 
 have not yet heard the result. 1 They ought to have started 
 yesterday, and, if so, ought to have let me know. But I 
 believe they are in good hands. 
 
 11 The Pomares belonged to the party was born to them in England, 
 of Maories whose reception by the ' Wirima died on the voyage to New 
 
 Queen was mentioned above. The Zealand. 
 Queen was Godmother to a child who
 
 1863 UNDER-SECRETARY FOR THE COLONIES 249 
 
 To Rev. E. Rogers. 
 
 1863. 
 
 I dined yesterday with Goulburn, and met Ward, of 
 Balliol, who was enormous fun. He is full of stories of his 
 own priests, some rather good; but what most interested me was 
 his account of Newman, which was very sad. He disposed 
 of as absurd (I have no doubt with truth) the statements that 
 Newman was dissatisfied in the sense of being shaken in his 
 belief. But it appeared clearly that he is entirely a fish out of 
 water that he has practically broken with the old Roman 
 Catholics that almost all even of his old friends have left him 
 that he thinks very ill of his own health, and that his principal 
 interest now is in his school at Birmingham, about seventy or 
 eighty sons of converts. The main difference appears to be as 
 to the manner of education. Newman is for a system like our 
 public schools and universities with great freedom of life. 
 Accordingly while he was at Dublin College it transpired that 
 some of the collegians had been going to plays, and had 
 been hunting in pink. This is wholly contrary to their 
 system, which is one of close surveillance and rigid discipline, 
 and the Archbishop held forth to Newman for half an hour 
 and an hour about it. (' Very narrow-minded man, you know, 
 Archbishop Cullen, but excellent good man and in this case, 
 you know, quite right, I think.') ' But then,' as he says to 
 Ward, ' what can I do when Dr. Newman just listens to me 
 without speaking, and then says, " I will think about it," and 
 then everything goes on just as it was before ? ' There is an 
 internal evidence of truth about this which places it beyond 
 doubt. One sees the stony expression of Newman's face. 
 Well, thereupon they turned him out, greatly to his own mortifi- 
 cation, and, of course, having given up the English Church 
 for the Roman, and England with his English friends for 
 Ireland and the Irish, it must have been galling and sad to be 
 sent back again to the place with which you had broken all 
 or almost all your ties. 
 
 Ward implied almost used the expression that N. 
 considered that his real life had come to a close in 1845. 
 But then one knows what Ward's ideas are worth.
 
 250 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vn 
 
 The Roman Catholics describe Newman as a mauvais 
 coucheur, bad bedfellow. 
 
 Ward said that St. John was the only man who had stuck 
 to him. Dalgairns had quite left him I suppose for Faber. 
 On the whole I came home very sad about him, and much 
 disgusted with Manning, Faber, Wiseman, et id genus omne. 
 
 He seems to be writing a great work, ' Faith and 
 Reason,' I suppose on the ground of belief in everything. It 
 will be a good work (I do not doubt) when it comes. It 
 occurs to me that Church would very much like to see all 
 this. But I have no time to write it him ; would you send it 
 him? 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 18 Radnor Place : July 12, 1864. 
 
 Of course you have been in a certain amount of excite- 
 ment here about the vote of no confidence. The reports were 
 up and down for a long time : at the last people expected a 
 majority of about ten, and the eighteen was a triumph to the 
 Ministry. As you see, the Conservatives gained some eighteen 
 Irish Roman Catholic votes, with whom Dizzy is always 
 supposed to be coquetting ; per contra, they lost a few Con- 
 servatives who were disgusted at the Catholic alliance. The 
 Whig Evangelicals sent out a manifesto to their co-religionists 
 (it is said) calling on them to come out from among the 
 Papists, and some obeyed the call and voted with Palrnerston. 
 Northcote, by whom I sat to see the lamentable conclusion of 
 the Eton and Harrow cricket match, was talking politics to 
 Lord Cawdor, and both agreed that they wished to be quit of 
 the Irishmen. ' Every Irish vote we gain loses us an English 
 one.' That is one of the bones of contention between Diz. 
 and his party. 
 
 Cardwell told me that he thought the speeches also told on 
 the division. One man said \vhen Pam got up, ' Now my vote 
 depends on this speech,' and voted with Pam. He said that 
 Brand (the Treasury Whip) told him that he considered that 
 Dizzy's replies frequently sent votes to the Ministry, i.e. that 
 people were disgusted at his rhetorical slash, and took it out 
 by voting against him. They now talk of the Ministry being
 
 1864 UNDER-SECRETARY FOR THE COLONIES 251 
 
 safe until next autumn, which seems to me rather rash, con- 
 sidering how little anybody can calculate on Pam's life, or 
 foresee what will happen if he dies or throws up, and Glad- 
 stone steps forward to lead the Commons, or to obstruct any 
 one else who is put forward to lead. I imagine his speech 
 to have been a considerable success once or twice I have 
 heard the expression that it ' crushed the debate.' 
 
 As I have said I spent a morning (being rather easy just 
 now) in seeing the end of the Eton and Harrow match. I 
 had no notion what a pretty thing a cricket match was. The 
 Harrow fielding was beautiful no fumbling but every 
 fellow stopped the ball as if it stuck to his hand the moment 
 they touched. I hear the bowling was very good also, but 
 that I had not eyes to see. 
 
 To Miss Florence Nightingale. 
 
 December 6, 1864. 
 
 Dear Madam, The abuse of supplying liquors to Indians 
 and aborigines is, as you may suppose, no new matter of 
 regret perhaps I should say despair to this office. Laws 
 have been passed against it in Upper and Lower Canada, in 
 Vancouver I., in New South Wales, Victoria and Queensland, 
 New Zealand, and, I think, in West Australia. Police 
 regulations of the same kind exist in S. Australia. 
 
 But the difficulty is not in passing laws but in enforcing 
 them ; and considering the difficulty of enforcing all that 
 ought to be enforced, even in this old, well-organised country, 
 against the unwearying pressure of pecuniary interests, it can 
 easily be imagined what is the difficulty of preventing 
 publicans from doing as they like in young democracies where 
 the machinery of Government is meagre, population scattered 
 (as in the Australian bush and Canadian backwoods), and 
 perhaps a large seaboard is the scene of a more or less illicit 
 coasting trade. 
 
 I dare say that more might be done than is much more. 
 But the wishes of the Home Government are perfectly well 
 known in such matters, and the temper of the colonists (at 
 least, in large colonies) is not very tolerant of Home inter-
 
 252 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vn 
 
 ference. I fear, therefore, that the Secretary of State could 
 do little more than remain on the watch for opportunities, 
 which would enable him to stir the question, and keep 
 governors alive to their duties. This is rather an unsatis- 
 factory conclusion, and I heartily wish for myself that I saw 
 my way to anything less unsatisfactory. But I am not 
 aware, at the present moment, of any colony in which a 
 movement from the Colonial Office would be likely to do any 
 good. 
 
 Yours very faithfully, 
 
 F. ROGERS. 
 
 To Lady Rogers. 
 
 December n, 1864. 
 
 Mozley, as you perhaps know, is going to preach what 
 are called the Bampton lectures at Oxford, and has taken 
 Miracles as his subject. He is very like himself, thinking away 
 like a steam engine of 100 horse-power, and whirling you 
 along with him if you will let him. However, he came here 
 more to pump than to talk, and I held forth on Metaphysics 
 like a demon. I did not know I had so many. I shall be 
 curious to see what he makes of it. It is the subject of the 
 day, and he might do the world and himself any amount of 
 good by a really first-rate treatise. 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 1 8 Radnor Place : December 23, 1864. 
 
 My dear Kate, We have been unusually quiet since we 
 got home, except as to family company. Partly, I believe, 
 because I was getting rather sluggish and averse to the 
 trouble of composing a dinner party : partly, I suppose, be- 
 cause other people are reserving themselves for later in the 
 season. 
 
 Cardwell is happily absent, though not so much as I could 
 wish. He is very friendly, but his fidgets are a great torment. 
 The constant presence in his mind of the House of Commons 
 and the Leader of the Opposition is a terrible nuisance. And 
 after a despatch is drafted with sufficient clearness to give all 
 necessary instruction and sufficient prudence to be perfectly
 
 1864 UNDERSECRETARY FOR THE COLONIES 253 
 
 defensible (because right) against any reasonable attack, he 
 will go on for half an hour revising and modifying and paring 
 off edges in order that it may offer no handle ; sometimes, as 
 I think, to the disadvantage of the despatch as a matter of 
 administration. 
 
 I have been a good deal interested by the proposed 
 American union. We have had the principal man here, the 
 Canadian Prime Minister, 2 to talk it over, and of course 
 it was interesting to understand (though of course seeing 
 through his eyes) the position of affairs. The great difficulty 
 is to arrange for a real union of the five provinces (Canada, 
 New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Newfoundland, and Prince 
 Edward Island) on terms which shall make the Central 
 or Federal Legislation really dominant, so as to make one 
 body politic of the whole, and yet to provide security to the 
 French Canadians that this dominancy would not be used to 
 swamp their religion and habits. Then, as it is not, of course, 
 desirable (or is supposed not to be so) to legislate specifically 
 for Lower Canada, there is to be a scheme which gives too 
 much to the individual provinces, but leaving it to the British 
 provinces to effect a clear amalgamation by degrees. This, 
 as you may suppose, renders the affair rather wanting in 
 neatness and scientific character. But I suppose it will push 
 through, as all parties are agreed in desiring to launch a 
 ' British America.' 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 F. R. 
 
 Extract from a letter to a Colonial Governor? 
 
 Your suspicion that you are over-full in your despatches 
 is, I think, just. Their exuberance, so to call it, gives them 
 rather an appearance (which is, of course, disadvantageous) 
 of being written for the public, not very well informed and 
 anxious to be amused and interested, than for a Secretary of 
 State anxious to deal rightly with the subject in hand, and 
 desirous above all things of having succinctly, prominently 
 
 2 Sir John Macdonald. There is a 3 This was written in answer to a 
 
 fuller account of these matters at the letter asking for criticism of despatches, 
 end of chapter viii.
 
 254 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vn 
 
 completely, and once for all brought before him the informa- 
 tion (including, of course, state of opinion) which is requisite 
 to guide his judgment, and the impressions of the Governor 
 on these facts. I mean that reiteration, reflections, historical 
 illustrations and quotations &c., necessary and instructive to 
 a general reader, are easily overdone in the transaction of 
 business. 
 
 Then there are two or three points on which I should 
 lodge what is called, I think, a ' caveat.' 
 
 1. General fulness of statement is no compensation for 
 the omission of an important fact or consideration ; sometimes 
 even it has the effect of overlaying the significant fact. 
 
 2. It is no doubt a Governor's clear duty to give the 
 Secretary of State his honest opinion and honest information ; 
 and it is his right also to do so for his own protection. But 
 a Governor is often under a temptation to do more than this, 
 and so to express his own opinions as to appear an advocate 
 for the views held by those about him (and by himself), 
 although by so doing he may add to the practical difficulties 
 of the Government here. 
 
 3. It is impossible for a Secretary of State to ignore in- 
 formation which comes to him from newspapers, individuals, or 
 elsewhere. What he can do and ought to do, and what it is 
 the rule to do, is to give the Governor (or Colonial Govern- 
 ment indirectly) the opportunity of explanation. If a request 
 for explanation is treated as a censure (as I think you and 
 your ministers treat it), all this information (which it is, I 
 repeat,- impossible to exclude, often impossible to leave un- 
 noticed) will be doing its work silently and uncontradicted, 
 than which nothing can be worse for the Governor and the 
 Colony. 
 
 4. No doubt the colonists, or some of them, are angry 
 with us. They may have some good reasons. It is not for 
 me to say they have not. But they have some bad ones. 
 One is this : some of their friends are continually trying, 
 while disclaiming argument or controversy, to do the work of 
 argument by insinuating in papers intended for the public 
 facts which we think untrue, and arguments which we think 
 delusive. We do not like our flank being thus turned, and
 
 1864 UNDER-SECRETARY FOR THE COLONIES 255 
 
 justifiably, as I hold, protest sharply against such insinuations, 
 recalling what, if we are right, is the true state of affairs. 
 This has a tart appearance, but it is the doing of those who 
 provoke it. 
 
 Another bad reason is that the Secretary of State is un- 
 hesitatingly represented as saying sometimes what he has 
 cautiously avoided saying ; sometimes what he has expressly 
 disclaimed (there is, I think, a splendid instance in a paper 
 you sent me lately), or as implying or believing a fact when 
 he only asks a question. The representations of course 
 become current ; the original on which the representations 
 are based does not. And the consequence is, of course, a 
 popular impression against the Colonial Office. . . . 
 
 I am writing on post day without time to be short, and 
 unluckily without your letters before me, so I may not have 
 chosen my words very properly, or have said exactly what I 
 wished to say in answer to your letters. 
 
 Yours sincerely, 
 
 F. ROGERS. 
 
 To Rev. E. Rogers. 
 
 1865 
 
 I think Charles Buxton has rather disgraced himself in 
 his writing about Eyre. 4 My notion is that Eyre was really 
 justified in viewing the matter as a most dangerous rebellion 
 to be crushed at all hazards, and I expect to find his first 
 measure right. But I doubt whether he will be able to show 
 that he pulled up the rude reckless system of execution and 
 other punishment as soon as safety was substantially re- 
 stored, and he might have recovered his head. And I am 
 clear that he has not felt sufficiently the painful and terrible 
 character of what he and the officers acting under him have 
 done. 
 
 4 Mr. Eyre (previously distinguished action saved the English residents from 
 
 for his adventurous journeys in Aus- grave danger ; but it was judged that 
 
 tralia) was Governor of Jamaica. The he had carried his severity farther than 
 
 rising of the coloured population was, was necessary, and that his punishments 
 
 as may be gathered from the letters had been too summary ; and he was 
 
 which follow, a serious one ; and it recalled, 
 could not be questioned that his prompt
 
 256 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vn 
 
 As to the numbers of blacks killed our evidence at present 
 is : 
 
 1. Official despatches which do not show more than 200 
 or 300, but do not negative the idea that very many more 
 have been killed one way or other. 
 
 2. A loose statement in a private letter that ' I should say 
 1,000 had been killed.' 
 
 3. A triumphant statement in a Jamaica paper that 2,000 
 have been killed. A report of the naval officer in command 
 that 1,500 would be a moderate estimate. 
 
 4. An oral statement of a dissenting minister and manager 
 of estate who was in the thick of it, and assisted at some of 
 the courts-martial, that many more than 2,000, say 5,000, may 
 have perished. 
 
 So that the matter is vague and terrible enough. I am 
 very anxious to see what this mail brings from Eyre. 
 
 To Rev. E. Rogers. 
 
 1865. 
 
 My dear Edward, Church found a point superfluous in 
 your Hebrew, but as the mistake was John Rogers's 5 and not 
 the printer's, he left it unaltered. Your title-page professes to 
 be a facsimile, not a revised edition. He read the two sheets 
 
 5 Edward Rogers was publishing of Christ Church in Dublin in 1651 for 
 
 The Life and Opinions of a Fifth such time as he should be minister for 
 
 Monarchy Man, chiefly extracted from the puritan congregation there : he was 
 
 the writings of Jo/in Rogers, preacher. afterwards imprisoned by Cromwell in 
 
 This John Rogers was an ancestor, Carisbrooke Castle, and treated very 
 
 father of the first baronet. There had harshly, but it was because he went too 
 
 been a constant family tradition (a far against earthly monarchs in fact 
 
 curious instance of the development of he was denounced for praying that God 
 
 myth) to the effect that ' their ancestor would 'hasten the time when Christ 
 
 had been Dean of Christ Church in should reign and we shall have no other 
 
 Dublin, imprisoned by Cromwell in Lord Protector. Let our faith have so 
 
 Carisbrooke Castle for his loyalty to much of the grain of mustard seed as 
 
 Charles I.' The truth, as Sir E. Rogers to say to that great mountain "Be 
 
 found, was that John Rogers, though removed" and it shall be removed.' 
 
 the son of a Prebendary of Ely, was Antony Wood called him ' a conceited 
 
 ultra-puritan and a preacher of the pragmatical fellow,' and Cromwell said 
 
 Fifth Monarchy. He was presented to him, 'You will talk, I see, though 
 
 by the Parliamentary Commissioners it be nothing to the purpose.' 
 with some of the confiscated revenues
 
 1865 UNDER-SECRETARY FOR THE COLONIES 257 
 
 and was clearly of opinion that there was nothing in them 
 which ought to be omitted. I was glad of this, for though 
 he did not know how much more of the same kind there was, 
 and so far saw your extracts at an advantage, yet he did not 
 also know how they were introduced, and so saw them at a 
 disadvantage. He was also clear that an account of R.'s 
 doctrine and discipline was indispensable. I really think 
 you could not have been shorter, unless you intended to write 
 a wholly different kind of book. He understands that he is 
 to review it. ... 
 
 Mrs. 's relations with her maids are rich. She was 
 
 describing one who was a breaker of china. At last she broke 
 three things in one day. ' So I said to her, " You are ill, Jane, 
 you want some castor oil." The maid stared and was asto- 
 nished. " Your hand shakes, you want some castor oil, Jane." 
 The maid took it as a joke and grinned. But when bedtime 
 came, the upper maid was duly summoned. " Jane is ill, and 
 wants some castor oil ; come with me and I will give it out 
 
 for her." ' . . . Mrs. appeared at the bedside with a 
 
 quite inflexible determination, explained that Jane was ill 
 and did want castor oil and must take it. She did take it, 
 and no further breakage occurred from that time to I don't 
 know when. 
 
 Ever yours, 
 
 F. R. 
 To Lady Rogers (Lady Blachford}. 
 
 July 1 8, 1865. 
 
 Almost before I got to Oxford I found it was all up with 
 us. 6 When the railway omnibus stopped at its first hotel 
 waiter and boots told us that Hardy was 200 ahead, evidently 
 too great a start to be made up"~on the last day's poll ; and 
 when I saw Bernard, he told me that the Committee had 
 actually telegraphed to Gladstone that the seat was lost 
 To-day will somewhat reduce the majority, but the poll is not 
 carried on with any hope of reducing it materially. The 
 numbers will be rather above 1,700 on one side, and about 
 
 6 The members for the University of 1865, Mr. Gathorne Hardy (Lord 
 had been Mr. Gladstone and Sir Cranbrook) took Mr. Gladstone's 
 William Heathcote. At the election place. 
 
 S
 
 258 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vn 
 
 1,900 on the other. The total number of voters is about 
 4,150. . . . It is a great bore. All the consolation is that 
 Hardy is not a Bacf man, certainly the best opponent that 
 
 | Gladstone has yet had. Gladstone will, of course, try South 
 Lancashire, but with very much diminished chance of getting 
 
 I in. ... 
 
 It is astonishing what mistakes men will make. One 
 actually sent up a voting paper certified properly by a 
 magistrate to have been signed by the voter in his presence, 
 but not signed by the voter at all. Some persons have been 
 troubled by a scruple of conscience in cases where the paper 
 was insufficiently executed, considering that after such a 
 failure they cannot conscientiously affirm that they have 
 ' signed no other voting paper ' (which they are required to 
 do) and have written up to the Committee for advice. The 
 answer has been ' Sir, you are mistaken in supposing that 
 you have signed a voting paper. You have indeed attempted 
 to do so, but you have signally failed. There is therefore no 
 reason,' &c. Gladstone has sent down an admirable fare- 
 well letter, short, dignified, and feeling, almost enough to make 
 some of his opponents repent of their votes, I should say. 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 Radnor Place : November 25, 1865. 
 
 My dear Kate, I have had my first interview with 
 William Forster. He is certainly a rough diamond, as strange 
 a contrast to Fortescue's polished, almost feminine, manner as 
 can well be imagined. But he seems a clear-headed, thinking, 
 and not wrong-headed man, ready for work and very friendly. 
 He began at once, when we were alone, asking after all the 
 family. . . . 
 
 I see he is a regular universal suffrage man, or something 
 near it, by his speech at Bradford, which by the way did not 
 appear to me to have much in it. 
 
 We are expecting our Jamaica news with some anxiety. 
 The soldiers seem to have made wildish work of it, and 
 Eyre's hanging a member of the Assembly by court-martial, 
 sending him from Kingston for the purpose, is rather startling.
 
 1865 UNDER-SECRETARY FOR THE COLONIES 259 
 
 The Dissenters are preparing a most furious attack on the 
 local Government and soldiers. They intend to try to make 
 out, I fancy, that Gordon was an obnoxious champion of the 
 negroes, whom the Government hated, and took this oppor- 
 tunity to get rid of. Of course they put themselves on their 
 defence and pelt as they are pelted. 
 
 To Right Hon. W. E. Gladstone. 
 
 1 8 Radnor Place : December 18, 1865. 
 
 My dear Gladstone, I ought to have thanked you some 
 days since for the copy of your speeches which you sent me. 
 Parts of them almost brought the tears to my eyes on re- 
 reading them in cold blood. But personally glad as I always 
 was to have you at Oxford, I cannot help feeling that you are 
 better where you are. The position of having to do good to 
 thosfi whom you represent, in a manner which they do not 
 conceive to be good, and that, not once or twice, but as a 
 consequence of certain differences of view on matters of 
 wisdom and equity which are sure to be always reproducing 
 themselves, is a position which would drive me mad, and from 
 which a man who is to govern the country ought to be 
 released. 
 
 I confess, however, that I hope to find that you differ from 
 some of your present constituents as to ends, almost as much 
 as you differed from some of your late constituents as to 
 means, if at least it is fair to call democracy an end and 
 Church ascendency a mean. 
 
 Yours very sincerely, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS. 
 
 To the Rev. R. W. Church. 
 
 Colonial Office : January 2, 1866. 
 
 My dear Church, What do you say about this ? You 
 see Gladstone is a good deal smitten by the book ' Ecce Homo,' 
 and would be glad to see it well reviewed. I should imagine 
 it would be very much in your line. Try it. It is, I hear, or 
 rather you see, an exhibition of our Saviour's character and 
 
 \
 
 260 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vn 
 
 mission from the merely human side, not "denying, but care- 
 fully excluding, the idea of His divine attributes. 
 
 I should imagine it would require much care to do justice 
 to its value as an exhibition of part of the truth, so as yet to 
 warn people effectually against so riveting their eyes on that 
 part as to become insensible to its essential incompleteness. 
 
 's ' something beyond human being needed ' is an un- 
 commonly feeble conclusion to arrive at. 
 
 I can easily believe that there may be Unitarians (and 
 this man may or may not be one of them) wKb love and 
 revere Christ, believing Him to be mere man, with greater 
 depth and fervency than many of us love and revere Him, 
 though believing Him to be God. And one would desire to 
 do justice to such men, utinam nostri essent I What one 
 would desire is that such men's works should be so exhibited 
 as to lead Unitarians and others forward instead of leading 
 Churchmen backward. And this would be done in this case 
 if (to put the matter extravagantly) any one would write such 
 a book under the title of ' My Lord and my God ' as would 
 , furnish an inseparable second volume to ( Ecce Homo,' so that 
 no one who bought one would think his book complete with- 
 out the other. 
 
 However, all this is said in the dark, as I have not seen 
 the book, I have heard of it. 
 
 Why will you not come to town ? There are so many 
 things, it seems to me, that I should like to talk to you about. 
 The Jamaica business is most terrible. The doings on both 
 v .sides appear in truth to be rather worse than better than what 
 you see in the papers. Only that consideration suggests 
 excuses for the whites which are wholly wanting in the case 
 of the blacks. It is really terrible to see human nature naked. 
 
 Ever yours, 
 
 F. ROGERS. 
 
 To the Rev. R. W. Church. 
 
 January 25, 1866. 
 
 My dear Church, What Newman says about his views on 
 the present state of things is a reflection on \vhaF~I said on
 
 1866 UNDER-SECRETARY FOR THE COLONIES 261 
 
 the author of ' Ecce Homo/ 7 that one of his aims was the 
 ( moral elevation of your (the Roman) Church.' 
 
 He replies with general truth no not moral, but mixed 
 moral and intellectual, a narrowness which is not of God.' 
 
 Again, his anticipations for the future, as to a fresh aspect 
 of doctrine opening out, seem to me rather an answer to my 
 suggestion that ' Ecce Homo ' was aiming at establishing a basis 
 of doctrine without assuming inspiration in any technical sense. 
 
 I understand him to amuse himself by taking all the 
 privileges of sham mystification with me. ' I have sent for 
 the book,' i.e. he said to somebody, ' Just fetch "me " Ecce 
 Homo," I want to see what it was in the forty-eighth page 
 that opened Rogers's eyes so wide.' 
 
 To Right Hon. W. E, Gladstone. 
 
 1 8 Radnor Place : February 18, 1866. j 
 
 My dear Gladstone, If you have twenty minutes to spare 
 next Sunday do cast your eye through Newman's two sermons 
 sixteen and seventeen of the volume called ' Sermons on the 
 Subjects of the Day,' headed ' The Christian Church an 
 Imperial Power,' and ' Sanctity the Token of the Christian 
 Empire,' particularly pages 256-58, 263-5, 2 73~5. 284, 287. 
 And observe not only the particular thoughts but their group- 
 ing and relation to each other. 8 
 
 ' If he be not Bran he is Bran's brother.' 
 Yours sincerely, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS. 
 
 7 Sir John Seeley published Ecce Homo. 
 
 Homo'm T866 without Ms name, and " Coincidences, partly of thought and 
 
 many incorrect guesses at the author partly of style, may be observed, if the 
 
 were made at the time. It is remark- passages referred to are compared with 
 
 able that (as appears from this" and the the chapters inEae Homo on 'Christ's 
 
 next two letters) two of Newman's Royalty,' ' Christ's Credentials,' and 
 
 most intimate friends, both very acute ' The Conditions of Membership in 
 
 critics, discussed the probability of Christ's Kingdom.' 
 Newman himself having 
 
 ^f 
 
 I
 
 262 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vn 
 
 To the Rev. R. W. Church. 
 
 1 8 Radnor Place [February 1866 ?] 
 
 My dear Church, I am so possessed with the idea 
 of the book being Newman's that nothing will drive it 
 out of my head, not even this "letter, though it is not in style 
 like Newman, and as you say mystification is carried very 
 far. Why should you not give your name ? and why should 
 you not give Macmillan leave to print your article if he likes ? 
 Be the author of ' Ecce Homo ' who he may, I should (if I 
 were you) like to have established a relation of personal 
 friendship with him. I think it is really ungracious to refuse. 
 It clearly accepts your interpretation of the book so far 
 as belief in the Divinity of Christ goes, on which you express 
 a positive opinion. But it does not say / am a Roman 
 Catholic. 
 
 '~ I have been reading your Hooker by snatches. I like 
 the preface very much, but I see that when you warm to your 
 work, and involve yourself in a sentence in which you really 
 wish to give force and vivacity to what you have to develop, 
 you still run to substantives. I think you are quite right to 
 do in your fashion what requires to be done best. 
 
 Hooker's melody is beautiful certainly. One has a curious 
 feeling in reading it, that it is such a full grandiose exposition 
 of truth with such odd assumptions as evidence of matters 
 which in the present day are almost exploded, at any rate 
 that have to be stated with proof or apology by a member of 
 the aristocracy of intellect. 
 
 The style of the writing brings to my ears the lines 
 
 ' A solemn air, and the best comforter 
 ' To an unsettled fancy.' 
 
 Just at the present conjuncture of religious belief, would 
 a sketch of the counter-Church heathen revival of philosophy 
 and morality be interesting. I could fancy some curious 
 parallels. An essay on Origen, for example, or Julian the 
 Apostate. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 F. ROGERS.
 
 1866 263 
 
 CHAPTER VIII 
 Last Years of Official Life, 1866-1870 
 
 IN June 1866 Lord Russell's Government was turned out by 
 Lord Dunkellin's amendment to the franchise bill and Lord 
 Derby became Premier. Lord Carnarvon was the new 
 chief at the Colonial Office. ' Lord Carnarvon became at 
 once a friend more intimate than Cardwell, both because 
 there was more warmth in him, and because there was the 
 bond of a common feeling in Church matters. He was a 
 great contrast. He had not Cardwell's hard-headed desire 
 so to do the work that statesmen, and Parliament following 
 statesmen, should see it was well done : but he had more of 
 a generous desire to effect worthy objects, and also more, I 
 think, of a wish to shine before the public and to distinguish 
 himself in the ordinary sense of the word. His failing was 
 rather too much self-consciousness, and a disposition to be 
 caught by showy schemes. He was not the least afraid of 
 the House of Commons, a great recommendation to a chief 
 in the eyes of his subordinates ; but on the other hand, being 
 in the House of Lords, though he was less afraid of what the 
 House of Commons would say or think of him, he was less 
 able to control what they could do to him and his measures. 
 He was friendly to everybody and particularly so to me both 
 as a chief and as a companion. It was curious, that though 
 he was fully aware of his own abilities and desirous of 
 receiving credit for them, particularly in his measures and 
 public appearances, he was given to take a second part in 
 conversation, always wishing rather to draw out others than 
 to speak himself. Accordingly I used to find myself lecturing 
 him almost in the tone of an old college tutor, which is after 
 all a little the same position as that of a Senior Under-
 
 264 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vin 
 
 Secretary. When Cardwell retired he gave his opinion 
 (without any suggestion from me) to his successor, Lord 
 Carnarvon, that I ought to have assistance, which was given 
 me in the person of Henry (now Sir Henry) Holland, 1 than 
 whom it was impossible to have a more delightful subordi- 
 nate : prompt, intelligent, conciliating, regular, always ready 
 to help, never making difficulties, and having that quickness 
 to perceive the characteristic or amusing side of business 
 which goes far to make work into play. Not only did his 
 industry take work off my shoulders, but his companionship 
 lightened what remained. He had a kind of pleasantly 
 impulsive rapidity, which in some men leaves an impression 
 of want of solidity ; but his judgment was very good, and he 
 would stand to it. He had at once that openness of mind 
 which would make him, as a member of a department or a 
 party, alive to the force of adverse arguments, and at the 
 same time that intelligent flexibility which enables a man to 
 turn the flank of differences, and to continue to act not less 
 cordially because on one point there was a hitch. When 
 Lord Carnarvon left the Disraeli Ministry with Lord Salis- 
 bury and General Peel, on the occasion of the 1 867 Reform 
 Bill, he was succeeded by the Duke of Buckingham, a 
 thoroughly honest and kind-hearted man, with a rough but 
 friendly manner, not without shrewdness, and clear-headed, 
 but with a natural turn for detail which he had indulged as 
 Chairman of a great railway, till it injured his capacity as a 
 Minister. . . . The Duke of Buckingham was followed at the 
 Colonial Office (when Mr. Gladstone became Premier) by 
 Lord Granville, the pleasantest and most satisfactory chief of 
 those under whom I served. His merits as a chief were, that 
 he trusted his subordinates in matters of detail, that he saw 
 his way clearly and would act vigorously in what may be 
 called ministerial as distinguished from departmental policy, 
 and he was ready to act with promptitude and authority in 
 matters which none but a chief could handle, matters requi- 
 ring action in the House of Lords or the Cabinet or the 
 Treasury. And in a diplomatic kind of way he thoroughly 
 enjoyed the characteristic and amusing side of business.' 
 
 1 The present Lord Knutsford.
 
 1866 LAST YEARS OF OFFICIAL LIFE 265 
 
 To Lady Rogers. 
 
 Colonial Office : July 4, 1866. 
 
 Lord Carnarvon has made his appearance. Cardwell has 
 had him here to talk to, and called me in to be bottle-holder. 
 I was much struck by Cardwell's mode of going through the 
 state of business. There was such an evident wish simply to 
 ease matters to his successor and facilitate in every way the 
 transaction of business. 
 
 Both were very kind to me, and Lord C. almost instantly 
 asked about distribution of work, and seemed surprised to 
 find that I had what I have to do : on which Cardwell spoke 
 up (having left something to the same effect in writing) and 
 said that he should be prepared to support any step for taking 
 the legal busiuess away from me, as a relief that concerned 
 the interest of the public. Lord C. meets me here to-morrow 
 at 1 2 o'clock to take up what most presses. 
 
 How those poor Austrians are getting slaughtered ! 2 It 
 is heart-breaking. I should suppose that the end of the 
 Austrian Empire was fairly come, were it not that they seem 
 to be so wonderfully tenacious of life. 
 
 To Lady Rogers. 
 
 October 9, 1866. 
 
 I have had a pleasant Sunday at Highclere. Sir Henry 
 Storks, 3 a certain Major Skinner, a Ceylon official, a very fine 
 fellow, I should think, of the ' valuable old public servant ' 
 sort, two New Brunswickers, the Oxford notoriety Mansel, 
 and his wife, and a young brother Auberon, I think, is his 
 name whom I liked greatly, and a young private secretary 
 who was cordial and energetic in doing the honours of the 
 house. 
 
 '-' The Battle of Sadowa was fought His work there was over, when Sir 
 
 on July 3- John Peter Grant was appointed 
 
 3 Governor of Malta. The year Governor of Jamaica, and he returned 
 
 before he had been sent out to Jamaica to his post at Malta. He was Lord 
 
 as President of the Commission to High Commissioner of the Ionian 
 
 inquire into the events which took Islands at the time of their cession to 
 
 place in the governorship of Mr. Eyre. Greece, in 1864.
 
 266 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vm 
 
 Storks is always pleasant. I never came across a more 
 complete man of the world a man with all his wits about 
 him, never slighting or quarrelling with anybody never 
 committing himself determined to succeed in all he attempts 
 and to let alone what cannot be effected ready and quick- 
 witted in conversation, never without his answer to any thrust 
 you make at him plenty of good sayings and stories talking 
 such French, it was a pleasure to hear the sounds, and 1 
 should think as good Italian a scientific appreciation of a 
 French cook, and of the proprieties of a dinner thinking 
 London even in November better than the country, and 
 plainly professing that if, as the ' Autocrat ' says, ' good 
 Americans when they die go to Paris,' he would be content to 
 throw in his lot with them. 
 
 If there is one thing he would like just now, it is that the 
 Pope would take refuge in Malta during his government : I 
 think I see the grave courtesy with which he would receive 
 His Holiness, with a perfect appreciation of what was due to 
 the Chair of St. Peter from the representative of the British 
 Crown in Malta, and vice versa. 
 
 I am not sure whether he has strong affection or much 
 imagination. However, he is, I should think, a capital 
 master, a capital servant, a capital ally, and a capital com- 
 panion. 
 
 To Lady Rogers. 
 
 1 8 Radnor Place : November 2, 1866. 
 
 My dear Mother, I cannot get from under my pressure 
 quite, but I must not delay in giving you an account of my 
 last Highclere visit till I have forgotten it all. 
 
 I had offered myself for Sunday and was accepted, and 
 pressed to come on Friday to talk over some business for 
 Saturday's mail. ... I had unwittingly offered myself to 
 meet the Salisburys and the Disraelis. It was a piece of luck, 
 for Lord Carnarvon had first asked me on the previous 
 Sunday when I was engaged. The other guests were a young 
 cousin, Edward Herbert, Graham the private secretary, and 
 Verdon, a Melbourne Minister. I planted myself next Edward 
 Herbert, a pleasant, intelligent Viennese attache. . . . Dizzy
 
 1866 LAST YEARS OF OFFICIAL LIFE 267 
 
 was either much out of humour or assumed the mysterious ; 
 silent and sullen-looking, as far as I saw. He is certainly a 
 most remarkable-looking fellow eyes, mouth, chin, hair, 
 everything ; but he is far more massive and powerful-looking 
 than I imagined. The caricatures give me a notion of 
 something rather insignificant. There is nothing at all of 
 that nothing puny, or merely acute. . . . 
 
 Next day Saturday. I had some very pleasant walking 
 with Edward Herbert and was greatly amused at an interview 
 with a gamekeeper whom we met. The gamekeeper was got 
 up in such gilt and velveteen as almost made one take off 
 one's hat, and was full of dissatisfaction at the leave given to 
 tenants to kill hares, and looking forward with a grim satis- 
 faction to ' his Lordship ' having next year to send into New- 
 bury to buy leverets for the table ; then he burst out on the 
 farmers. ' Right good shots, sir ; some of them will kill their 
 fourteen or seventeen hares a day ; there's - , the best shot 
 in the neighbourhood, just as good as any gentleman as has 
 been brought up to it.' He was altogether of opinion that a 
 Tory Government was an unmixed evil, ' made his Lordship 
 entirely neglect the game, and no getting him to listen to any- 
 thing.' 
 
 At breakfast and luncheon I found myself next Mrs. 
 Disraeli. She insists on being heard and seen and ' keeps up 
 the ball ; ' rather thinks herself the life of the party. Seeing 
 out of the window a piebald cow in the park, she insisted 
 that every one all round the table should wish for something 
 (I suppose you know the superstition ; I did not), overriding 
 and smashing all the little private neighbourly conversations. 
 Lord Salisbury wished for ' sleep ' and explained himself to 
 wish for ' the power of going to sleep when he was bored.' 
 
 On Sunday I had two delightful walks ; the day was per- 
 fect and the place lovely, and I liked my companions 
 Graham in the morning, Auberon Herbert and Verdon in the 
 afternoon, and partly Lord Carnarvon. I was almost tempted 
 to join their smoking party after bedtime. 
 
 On Monday I found myself (without being treated with 
 anything but the most entire friendliness) rather hustled off 
 i.e. sent by a rather slow, very early train when there was
 
 268 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vm 
 
 another an hour later, and faster. However, I had every 
 reason to be satisfied with the result, for it appeared that the 
 Disraelis were going by the last train, while Lord and Lady 
 Salisbury, Verdon and Edward Herbert were going by the 
 first. The Highclere party had a carriage to itself, and we 
 were really neither more nor less than a jolly party. 
 
 I have not told you Lord Salisbury's story about the 
 Duke of Malakhoffand his pheasant. He (Malakhoff) was at 
 a battue at Strathfieldsaye and shot nothing, much to his 
 disgust, and when the day was over it appeared that he 
 would be extremely put out unless he was allowed or enabled 
 to kill something ; so, in spite of all the gamekeepers could 
 think, feel, or say, a pheasant was procured, tied by its leg to 
 the top of a post, and Malakhoff was put some thirty yards 
 off with a double-barrelled gun. It was supposed that he 
 would thereupon and from thence take two shots at the bird. 
 Not a bit of it ; he loaded his two barrels, walked close up to 
 the pheasant, put the muzzle close to him and discharged 
 both barrels into him with ' He ! coquin ! ' The next day 
 the Duke of Wellington told the keeper that Malakhoff was a 
 great man who had smoked to death 500 Arab men, women, 
 and children in a cave, to which the gamekeeper replied, 
 4 Like enough, your Grace, he'd be capable of anything.' 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 1 8 Radnor Place : November 2, 1866. 
 
 My dear Kate, I am much elated to hear of the flower- 
 ing of another Sikkim rhododendron. 4 Oddly enough, I had 
 just been admiring at Stowe what I took to be Sikkim rhodo- 
 dendrons and trying to make out whether any of them were 
 the same as ours. It looks a beautiful flower, and it gives 
 hopes that the others may come on one by one. 
 
 Stowe is a magnificent place, ducal in the highest possible 
 degree. But, after the fashion, I suppose, of the last century, 
 everything seems sacrificed to pomp. There is one perfectly 
 magnificent suite of rooms running from one end of the house 
 to the other. Here is the south front. (Sketched on the 
 letter.) 
 
 4 A present from Sir Joseph Hooker, brought from the Himalayas.
 
 1866 LAST YEARS OF OFFICIAL LIFE 269 
 
 In front, a terrace garden, and in front of that a splendid 
 lawn with trees on each side (pierced for one or two views) 
 sloping down to the water at .the bottom, and facing 
 the opposite slope of the valley. But (for the sake of the 
 architectural fagade) not one of the south bedrooms along 
 this grand south front look out to this great view, but look 
 out over the leads, or sideways, and the domestic dining-room 
 and the Duke's study are down in the basement, so low that 
 I think they can hardly see over the terrace flower-beds, on 
 which they look, to the view beyond. The other side of the 
 basement is offices, and all that part of the house seems 
 intended for it, for you have to go through dreary cellar-like 
 vaulted corridors to get at the Duke's study. However, for 
 entertaining crowned heads it is admirable. 
 
 I disposed of what I went down for, pretty much to my 
 satisfaction, or at least got the instructions for it, and must 
 finish off to-morrow. . . . The Duke seems to be endeavour- 
 ing to recover as he can the mass of beautiful things that 
 were sold to pay his father's debts. He showed me some 
 miniatures (in which they were rich in old times), one of which 
 (the great Duchess of Marlborough) he had bought back. It 
 was lamentable to see the masses of empty brackets that were 
 formerly filled with majolica. The ceiling and wall decora- 
 tions were very fine ; they were done by Italian artists in about 
 1780. I rather like to see the internal decorations of that 
 date after the Louis Quatorze had a little worn out. 
 
 To Lady Rogers. 
 
 Colonial Office : May 8, 1867. 
 
 The Ministers, I fancy, are well pleased with themselves 
 about Luxemburg. What seems to me to be feared is that 
 Louis Napoleon is putting off the evil day till he has got a 
 sufficient armament of breech-loaders. I confess I do not 
 much fancy extending our guarantees. Storks has just inter- 
 rupted me with a call. He says that in Paris a week ago the 
 talk was all of war, and that the Prussians (he hears) look 
 on the Conference as an insult ; in fact, that war is to be. I 
 cannot imagine that we shall be foolish enough to guarantee
 
 270 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vm 
 
 Luxemburg. Storks thinks that Prussia would like a little 
 more time for preparation as well as France, and that the 
 French Man will carry it at first, but not at last. 
 
 To Lord Monck. 
 
 June 6, 1867. 
 
 My dear Lord Monck, I have sent on your letters and 
 enclose some copies of the Union Act. I wish you heartily a 
 pleasant voyage and a prosperous time in Canada. 5 
 
 It is a great occasion and there are few things I should 
 like better than to be at your elbow during the launch of the 
 new ship. 
 
 Yours sincerely, 
 
 F. ROGERS. 
 
 To Lady Rogers. 
 
 June 15, 1867. 
 
 My dear Mother, Yesterday evening a small 'immediate' 
 despatch box came in from the Duke of Buckingham, and 
 the lock being out of order I had, in great perplexity, to 
 commit the atrocity which shocked John so much, of breaking 
 it open, imagining Fenian invasions of Canada, an insurrection 
 in Heligoland, and ' what not.' However, it turned out to be 
 information that the Ministers and their Under-Secretaries 
 would be presented to the Sultan 6 at half-past three to-day, 
 and that he would take me if I was duly rigged out at 2.45. 
 
 And now I have just come back from making the 
 Commander of the Faithful's acquaintance. The rooms of 
 Buckingham Palace look, I think, more grandiose than I had 
 expected from seeing them in the evening, and of course there 
 was the usual approach through the handsome staircase with 
 flowers &c., &c. Then all the party collected gradually, 
 Ministers dropping in one after the other, and one or two Turks 
 sprinkled among them. The Duke introduced me to Fuad 
 Pasha, the Grand Vizier who shook my hand with a certain 
 
 5 The Act for the Confederation of Lower Canada, Nova Scotia, New 
 
 the North American Provinces was Brunswick and Prince Edward's Island), 
 
 passed in March 1867. Lord Monck The first Dominion Parliament met at 
 
 was going out as the first Governor- Ottawa in November of that year. 
 
 General of the new Dominion of 8 The Sultin Abdul Aziz. 
 Canada (then including Upper and
 
 1867 LAST YEARS OF OFFICIAL LIFE 271 
 
 empressement a keen-faced old man, with (I should have 
 said) a touch of the Greek in his physiognomy, red fez, blue 
 frock coat richly embroidered with lots of diamond orders, and 
 red trousers. Then after a time we were arranged in a semi- 
 circle, the door of the inner room was opened so that we saw 
 his suite and speculated about what they were, and after a 
 time he came forth at the head of them. Their general dresses 
 are modifications of Fuad Pasha's, but there were one or two 
 Albanians (beautiful dresses they are), red cap, gold tissue 
 scarf, white kilt with some bright scarlet showing below it, 
 and handsome leggings. 
 
 Then he made his round, began, and had some conversa- 
 tion with Lord Derby and the two or three chief Ministers 
 through Fuad, who seemed to translate everything, shaking 
 hands with them at the end. Then he came round and stood 
 for a moment or two before each of us second-chops, looking 
 more or less agreeable, while Lord Bradford said to Fuad, 
 ' Sir Frederic Rogers, sous-secretaire des Colonies,' and Fuad 
 said something to the Sultan, and I (as every one else) bowed, 
 and Fuad said on behalf of H.I.M. : ' Enchante de faire votre 
 connaissance.' Then he swept off again with his suite into his 
 inner room. 
 
 He is a handsome-looking man, pot-bellied, with a quiet, 
 heavy, and perhaps rather languid expression, but a dignified 
 manner, not at all graceful. The whole affair from Downing 
 Street to Downing Street took an hour. 
 
 It is a thing to have done to shake hands with a Grand 
 Vizier, though Grand Viziers are not what they used to be. 
 And I am certainly glad to have had a good look at the 
 Sultan. 
 
 There, I thought I would give you this while it was fresh 
 in my mind, and now I must set to work again. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 F. R. 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 July 6, 1867. 
 
 I thought the debate on martial law went well as to the 
 principle. I think we (the Colonial Office) are quite right on
 
 272 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vm 
 
 the point on which Cockburn denounces our view (viz. that 
 in emergencies a man is to suspend the law, trusting to an 
 act of indemnity). 
 
 The essence of the difference when run home appears to 
 me this : I say that a man in authority is to do his best to 
 put down a rebellion, trusting that if he acts honestly and 
 defensibly in general an act of indemnity will be passed to 
 cover all that he has done. 
 
 Cockburn says that a man in authority is to endeavour to 
 put down a rebellion by such means, and by such only, as a 
 jury of his countrymen may be expected in each separate 
 case to accept as rendered lawful by the necessity of the case. 
 
 His view seems to me to have every possible disadvantage. 
 
 It absolutely paralyses every man who is not prepared to 
 risk his own life and reputation ; for how can he tell what a 
 judge and jury will pronounce to be the measure of necessity 
 recognised by law ? And next it does not provide for a just 
 determination of the question, for it is almost certain that a 
 jury in such critical circumstances will be of such stuff that 
 either it will indiscriminately condemn every officer, or it will 
 indiscriminately acquit every officer, or it will be absolutely 
 incapable of agreeing on any verdict. A Government and 
 Legislature subject to the pressure of public opinion are far 
 less likely to be unfair. 
 
 Ever yours, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS. 
 
 To the Rev. R. W. Church. 
 
 1 8 Radnor Place : March 21, 1868. 
 
 I have just read Bernard. I do not see much harm in 
 what he says, except that he appears to me rather given to 
 advocate the particular step which the Liberals want for the 
 moment, without considering what next ; or rather, without 
 considering whether the next landing-place is more stable 
 than that which he proposes to leave. 
 
 If he only means that colleges may be relieved from Acts 
 of Uniformity, but should remain at liberty to impose tests 
 of their own, being consistent with or in the spirit of
 
 1868 LAST YEARS OF OFFICAIL LIFE 273 
 
 their Statutes, I am not disposed to differ from him in the 
 abstract. 
 
 But I wish the Church party had coolness and wisdom 
 and determination enough to see when the stand ought to be 
 made with the utmost available resolution. I should be quite 
 ready to abandon outworks, if only I were sure that somewhere 
 or other in the rear we were shutting gates and pulling up 
 drawbridges and mounting cannon. 
 
 What would be encouraging would be the way in which 
 the early Church, with all its abuses and absurdities, which I 
 suppose had begun to be pretty vigorous, had bottom enough 
 to throw off all the shallow intellectual speculations and philo- 
 sophical morality of Alexandria &c. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS. 
 
 To Lady Rogers. 
 
 Highclere Castle : August 9, 1868. 
 
 My dear Mother, Here we are for a Sunday. We stay 
 till 2 o'clock to-morrow, Monday, when we must be off for 
 me to sign letters &c. at Downing Street at 5 o'clock. G. 
 perhaps told you of my Committee on military matters. There 
 has been a great difficulty about a garrison for the Straits 
 Settlements, what it was to be, who was to pay, &c. Sir 
 H. Storks and I met and settled it to our own satisfaction. 
 But as the Horse Guards (not to say Treasury) were con- 
 cerned, the War Office sent us a letter to propose officially 
 that the matter should be referred to a Committee of one 
 representative from the Colonial Office, one from the War 
 Office, and one from the Horse Guards, meaning Sir H. 
 Storks, Sir Hope Grant, and myself. Storks and I are boule- 
 verses by an announcement from Sir Hope that nothing would 
 induce the Duke of Cambridge to consent to our plan. How- 
 ever, at last we agreed on something. 
 
 The point was that Storks and I wanted to have nothing 
 from the Horse Guards but 150 British artillery men, and 
 that the colony should provide for the rest armed police. 
 But the Horse Guards said that British troops could not stand 
 sentry in the tropics, therefore that if we had 150 white 
 
 T
 
 274 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vm 
 
 artillery with guns, magazine, &c., we must have 1 50 black 
 troops to stand sentry over all this, and then the black troops 
 would also have to stand sentry over themselves, and that 
 this would require another 150 black troops, 300 in all. Then 
 the question was how and where to get these black troops. 
 The Horse Guards wanted not to reduce a Ceylon coloured 
 regiment and use that ; Storks wanted to reduce it and save 
 money. Indian regiments had not enough white officers, the 
 Ceylon regiment could not keep up its privates, and so on. 
 However, at last we settled to hire a regiment from the Indian 
 Government. Of course / did not care where it came from 
 so long as we got it, having only to take care that faith was 
 kept with the colony, a pledge having been made that it 
 should have so many men for such a sum of money. 
 
 Well, this being our report, we all met. The Duke of 
 Cambridge's manner is uncommonly taking and pleasant and 
 frank. But somehow or other he had a jolly big-dog way of 
 blurting out things that made me inclined to laugh, and I felt 
 that if there were not a desk between him and me I should get 
 into a scrape. 
 
 The question arose, and the Horse Guards were to tell us, 
 what amount of troops were necessary. I should have meant 
 by this, what amount of troops were wanted to give the colony 
 such protection from mobs, neighbours pirates, &c., in time 
 of war as we undertook to give. But the Horse Guards never 
 seemed for a moment to entertain this view, their single 
 idea was, what sentries were necessary, and how many men 
 were necessary to give these sentries five nights in bed out of 
 six. . . . 
 
 This [a proposal of Sir J. Pakington's] entirely threw 
 over poor Storks (whose face visibly lengthened), and I must 
 say H.R.H. saw it like a shot, and got up from his seat: 
 * Ah, ah ! that'll do capitally. Just put that into writing,' and 
 then went over to Pakington as if he was going to stand over 
 him with his fist till he had done it. I fairly laughed (with 
 my face I mean) this time, and as he was now above the box 
 which screened me he caught it, and I thought I was in a 
 scrape. Not a bit. ' Ah, I see Sir Frederic smiles, but / always 
 think there's nothing like black and white.'
 
 1868 LAST YEARS OF OFFICIAL LIFE 275 
 
 And so it was all put down, and the last I heard from 
 Storks as we broke up at the door was : ' And here we are, just 
 where we were before.' True enough perhaps for him ; for the 
 Duke of Cambridge had done him. But the rest of the world 
 knew where they were, and now we shall have to battle it 
 out with the colony. I hope my view on that head will be 
 found to hold water. If not, I shall have to draw as long a 
 face as he does. 
 
 To the Rev. Father Newman. 
 
 1 8 Radnor Place : December 3, 1868. 
 
 My dear Newman, I put off answering your letter till I 
 heard from Doyle. I have not yet got through Gladstone's 
 autobiography, nor some other things which I began with hopes 
 that are disappointed. Of course, as you say, some of his 
 friends think it injudicious, and I am not sure that it is not 
 injudicious on that very account. One great weight which 
 Gladstone has to carry in the political race is a character for 
 want of judgment ; and every addition to that is an impedi- 
 ment. 
 
 I am prepared to find that, if it is not injudicious, it is an 
 act of the same kind as the Maynooth secession from Sir 
 Robert Peel i.e. a manifesto or manifestation to be appealed 
 to hereafter, when he moves on the English establishment, as 
 he now appeals to the Maynooth move in explanation of his 
 policy towards the Irish establishment. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 F. ROGERS. 
 
 To Miss S. Rogers. 
 
 1 8 Radnor Place : December 20, 1868. 
 
 I like my chief 7 very much. He is very pleasant and 
 friendly, and I think will not meddle beyond what is required 
 to keep us clear of political slips. G. told you of what Card- 
 well said, that he had told Lord G. that with him at the head 
 
 7 Lord Granville. Mr. Disraeli Minister. Lord Granville was at the 
 
 resigned early in December after the Colonial Office till Lord Clarendon's 
 
 General Election of November 1868, death in 1870, when he moved to the 
 
 and Mr. Gladstone became Prime Foreign Office. 
 
 T 2
 
 276 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vm 
 
 and me as the ' motive power,' the office could not go wrong ; 
 and then when I acknowledged the compliment said, ' Oh, it 
 is just the truth.' 
 
 I am just making a general reform as to my own business, 
 a horizontal instead of vertical section of the business, so that 
 I shall have all the top, and others all the bottom (this is a 
 rude way of saying it) instead of dividing the world between 
 us : Asia to me and Africa to Sandford. . . . 
 
 Sandford 8 I do not see much, but like what I see. He is 
 a good Churchman, which I am uncommonly glad of, and 
 seems to be going steadily at his work in a businesslike pains- 
 taking way. He meets my reform half way, though rather 
 depressing his position, and with perfect pleasantness. 
 
 There is no political speculation that I hear. Gladstone 
 is so strong that there is not much room for speculation. The 
 younger Radicals I imagine are very angry at not having a 
 better share in the places. You see they have all been pushed 
 into second-rate places, Forster, Ayrton, Stanfield, Bruce and 
 Childers being the only men who get a real lift. They are 
 men who are both regular ' county families,' and steady-going 
 fellows with no turn for revolution. Egerton (the late Con- 
 servative Under-Secretary of the F. O.) was loud in his praise 
 of the way in which they had helped the incoming Conserva- 
 tives with information, each in the department which he had 
 managed, to transact their business at starting, really anxious, 
 not for party advantage, but for the proper transaction of the 
 business of the country. On the whole I think the Radical 
 element is depressed to the utmost limit of prudence. Page 
 Wood's appointment is of course excellent. 
 
 To Right Honourable W. E. Gladstone. 
 
 Colonial Office : January 8, 1869. 
 
 My dear Gladstone, There is nothing in Church's reasons 
 to cause ' permanent uneasiness ' except so far as they indicate 
 that he is not getting better of his most unreasonable habit of 
 declining everything. 
 
 8 Mr. (afterwards Lord) Sandford was then Assistant Under-Secretary for the 
 Colonies.
 
 1869 LAST YEARS OF OFFICIAL LIFE 277 
 
 It seems, from a letter that I got from him this morning, 
 that when he wrote his Irish Church articles he made up his 
 mind that he would not be the better for them, and (in a spirit 
 which other people have acted on within the last thirty years 
 and got called crotchety for their pains) determined that if 
 you came into power, one of your first acts should not be to 
 give him anything. He said the kindness of your letter shook 
 him greatly, and that he never refused anything with so much 
 regret, but that he felt after all that there was no real reason 
 for changing his decision, and was only vexed at the appear- 
 ance of repelling a kindness, and the impossibility of explaining 
 to you. 
 
 It appears to me to the last degree unreasonable, and I 
 half feel that I myself as his friend owe you an apology. For 
 if every honest man is to act on his principle, how are you 
 possibly to fill the high places of the Church except with place- 
 hunters ? 
 
 Yours very sincerely, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS. 
 
 To Lady Rogers. 
 
 June 19, 1869. 
 
 My dear Mother, I don't know that I have anything 
 special to say, and sit down because I have a few minutes to 
 spare. 
 
 Our Foreign Office party went off very splendidly. It is 
 certainly a royal sight. The staircase, which my sisters will 
 remember, well lighted and filled with finely dressed people 
 going up and down was magnificent, like some great Paul 
 Veronese painting alive, only that the dresses are all of such 
 light colours. We always meet the same friends at these 
 places, Hollands, Forsters, Mowbrays, Palmers, and generally 
 politicals. Forster was full of praises of the speech of the 
 Bishop of Peterborough, 9 never had such a treat in his life ; 
 he enjoys a good cut and thrust, on whichever side it comes, 
 which J like in him. I praised Thirlwall's speech (St. Davids). 
 He said yes, but he did not half like to see a Bishop deserting 
 
 9 Bishop Magee against the Bill for the Disestablishment of the Irish Church.
 
 278 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vm 
 
 his position and his order. He certainly has a great, grim 
 allowance of an adversary's merits which is amusing. 
 
 Lord Granville, of course, was somewhat disgusted with the 
 mess BrigTit had goTIKem ~fnT67"saicT irwouT3~Tose r some votes, 
 and tol'd me what he himself was going to say with some fun. 1 
 Lord' Salisbury's interruption was curiously happy (as a hit) ; 
 it exactly put into his mouth what was the very next thing 
 he was going to say. I thought his plan of (I suppose) snub- 
 bing Bright's ungentlemariliness, by appropriating the attack 
 as one on himself 'as well as the other Lords (' unwisdom ' and 
 ' childish tinkering '), was very like him. I wonder whether 
 John Bright saw the snub. . . . 
 
 To Lady Rogers. 
 
 1 8 Radnor Place : November 1869. 
 
 My dear Mother, ... I don't know that I have much to 
 say to amuse you on your sick-bed. I expect we shall have 
 some fighting to do in the Parliament about the colonies next 
 February and wish we had some one stronger in the Commons 
 than Monsell. However, we have Gladstone well with us : 
 and he is, of course, aTiost. '" 
 
 'Just now we are rather perplexed by an insurrection in 
 the Red River (Hudson's Bay Territory), which comes just at 
 an unlucky moment, as the whole transfer of that great terri- 
 tory to Canada was on the point of taking place. 
 
 The official news came here in a long (cypher) telegram 
 on Friday while Macdonald 2 (who is for the moment in charge 
 
 1 At a meeting in Birmingham on Houses on June 18. Mr. Gladstone in 
 June 14, 1869 about the Irish Church his reply took occasion to say that he 
 Bill, then before the Lords, a letter was had himself steadily discouraged public 
 read from Mr. Bright (then President meetings on the subject then before 
 of the Board of Trade) in which he Parliament, and that each branch of 
 reflected on the capacity of the House the Legislature might justly feel jealous 
 of Lords, and hinted that if they delayed of any attempt to interfere with its 
 the passing of the Bill, people might liberty of discussion, 
 be led to inquire what was the ' special '-' The late Reginald Somerled Mac- 
 value ' of the House of Lords as part of donald, well known as an explorer 
 the Constitution. Even his own party of the High Alps. He was then a 
 felt that such a letter from a Cabinet clerk in the Colonial Office, and private 
 Minister was, to say the least, indis- secretary to Sir F. Rogers, 
 creet. A discussion was raised in both
 
 1869 LAST YEARS OF OFFICIAL LIFE 
 
 279 
 
 of the key or ^cypher as it is called) and Merivale were dining 
 here. As we have been worried by all sorts of rubbish, 
 Fenian threats, murder of Prince Arthur, and so on, Macdonald 
 was full of zeal about starting off at once to decypher it, leav- 
 ing his dessert behind him, and I was so affected by his fly- 
 away rodomontading ways that for a moment I was going to 
 let him go, when Merivale grimly grumbled to the rest of the 
 company, who, of course, were waiting the result, ' All this is 
 bluster and brag, you know.' This restored my presence of 
 mind and I told Macdonald that he need not hurry himself. 
 He says, if it had been at Stowe or Chandos House he would 
 have had to be off in a jiffy. When I went to bed, however, 
 I was a little fidgety and was rather reassured by receiving a 
 note from Macdonald at breakfast time to say it was only 
 this insurrection which he had heard of long ago. Meantime, 
 of course, it gives us a little trouble, framing a proclamation 
 and firing it off by cable, discussing with the Agent of the 
 Canadian Government, who may not like to take over the 
 property with the tenants in such a state, and so on. 
 
 Edward will remember a despatch I drafted at Blachford 
 to turn the flank of some fellows who are trying to set up an 
 anti-Downing Street Colonial Conference. It seems to have 
 answered its purpose, for I hear they complain that till that 
 despatch went round they got nothing but favourable answers, 
 and now they get nothing but unfavourable. They are, as 
 may be seen by the papers, agitating to the best of their 
 powers, but I think we shall beat them. . . . 
 
 I am afraid the Archbishop of Canterbury 3 is dying, and 
 of course every one is speculating on his successor. . . . Lord 
 Granville was asking me whom I thought the best man ; I said 
 (or at least wrote after consideration) Claughton. But, of 
 course, he is out of the question as being a Tory Bishop. 
 
 As times go I should not be ill pleased with Jacobson 
 whom I have heard mentioned. Lord G.'s criticism on him is 
 that he is a man who is always looking as if he was going to 
 say something uncommonly shrewd, but it never comes. 
 Edward will probably tell you that it is a whimsically good 
 picture of him. 
 
 3 Archbishop Tait. He recovered and lived nearly fourteen years longer.
 
 280 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vin 
 
 I should doubt whether Wilberforce would be allowed to 
 have it, nor should I myself be exceedingly pleased at the 
 appointment. 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 Walmer Castle : September 19, 1869. 
 
 My dear Kate, Here I am, as you see : very pleasantly 
 housed and on the mend. I am getting stronger, though not 
 very fast. . . . 
 
 The house is a strange place, a Henry the Eighth fortifica- 
 tion ; four round corner towers, with a moat round them 
 turned into garden, and in the middle a central tower with a 
 deep passage almost amounting to a small moat, but now 
 turned into passage. The great round tower is the habitable 
 part of the house with certain additions and subtractions, and 
 the turnings of the passages and shapes of the rooms are 
 beyond understanding. I give you a general plan of our bed- 
 room and dressing-room. . . . The corner towers are batteries 
 and make an extremely pleasant terrace overlooking the sea 
 and Goodwin Sands, with swarms of vessels : I counted up- 
 wards of 160, Lord Granville thought there must be 150 in 
 sight. Our party is : Lord Granville himself, who is full of 
 talk and anecdote ; Lady Granville, friendly and pleasant ; 
 her mother, Mrs. Campbell of Islay, and Meade ; so that we 
 spend our time agreeably. It is a pleasant run of anecdotes 
 which are characteristic, told with great freedom, and plea- 
 santer perhaps from the persons they relate to than they would 
 be as a mere matter of humour or oddity. I remember two 
 about his own family, i.e. his mother. His father, he said, 
 with all his experience, was to the last shy and silent, but 
 very fond of society. His mother cared little about society 
 but was perfectly prompt -and self-possessed, and he had one 
 or two stories of her readiness from third persons who were 
 by. A lady came to one of her Paris parties, and she said to 
 her neighbour, ' I know that woman, but I never invited her 
 here.' The lady approached and the friend wondered what 
 would happen ; when Lady Granville received her with the 
 most affable and cordial ' Enchantee de vous voir ici, madame, 
 invitee ou non invitee.'
 
 1869 LAST YEARS OF OFFICIAL LIFE 281 
 
 She had large parties, omnium gatherum, and small special 
 parties, principally French. A pushing lady attacked her at 
 the omnium gatherum, and told her that she lived herself so 
 much among the French that she hoped Lady G. would in- 
 vite her to one of her small parties. Lady G.'s answer was 
 prompt, compact, but in the most affectionate cadence ' No, 
 
 dearest Mrs. .' The two together amused me. And last 
 
 night we had a regular string of Cabinet and other stories, just 
 of that kind of calibre, perhaps scarcely capable of retailing 
 but very pleasant to hear run off. 
 
 Yesterday we drove over to Sir Walter James's, Bettis- 
 hanger, pretty gardens &c. ; to-day we are to walk to Deal 
 Castle (if a heavy shower does not prevent us). The country 
 has some tolerably pretty spots on the north but is generally 
 very dull ; to the S., i.e. towards Dover, it is evidently 
 better. I must finish. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 F. R. 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 Colonial Office : May 5, 1870. 
 
 As you see by the ' Times,' we are for the moment in a state 
 of satisfaction as to our Red River difficulty. 4 
 
 Lord Granville's statement seems to me very good and 
 judicious. The rocks ahead are connected with the murder 
 of Scott by Riel. I do not understand how Riel fails to see 
 that he is liable to be tried for his life for that little trans- 
 action. Nor do I see how the Government can avoid so 
 trying him if it once gets its hand on the reins. If this breaks 
 upon him he must either (i) ask an amnesty, (2) oppose our 
 troops while they are clambering and wading their way 
 through the lake country, (3) run away ; and in the two last 
 cases he will have to consider whether it would be more 
 
 4 After the Hudson's Bay Territory Settlement should be separate and 
 
 was transferred to Canada, Louis Riel independent. A successful expedition 
 
 headed an insurrection of the Red was led in August 1870, by Colonel 
 
 River Settlement (now Manitoba), (now F. M. Lord) Wolseley, against 
 
 seized Fort Garry and claimed that the the insurgents, who submitted quietly.
 
 2 8 2 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vm 
 
 satisfactory to him, like the Greek brigands, to finish off by 
 murdering a few of his opponents. 
 
 From all we hear, no Canadian Ministry would dare to 
 give an amnesty, and if the question rises it will rise on the 
 entry of our troops, under Imperial authority, i.e. it will fall 
 on Sir J. Young as an Imperial officer to settle it, and he will 
 ask us. 
 
 What would be most satisfactory in the abstract would 
 be to hang him. What would be most for the future peace 
 of the country would be that he should run off with such 
 Hudson Bay furs and other valuables as he can lay his hands 
 upon. 
 
 I saw a man yesterday who saw Scott shot (from a distance) 
 and repeated all the horrors of his being alive for some hours 
 after being nailed up in his coffin, and then the coffin being 
 opened and his being despatched. 
 
 I breakfasted the day before yesterday with Lord Granville 
 to discuss the difficulties of the expedition with Laurence 
 Oliphant .... who on the strength of having been in the 
 neighbourhood (at Lake Erie) thinks himself capable of 
 advising everybody. The croakers are rather tiresome. 
 Luckily Lord G. has a laudable impassibility to croak when 
 he is once in for it. 
 
 Sir John Mitchell, late commander-in-chief, is sending us 
 long memoranda to show that the route is impracticable, to 
 which the answers are : I. that Canada has spent ioo,ooo/. 
 in improving it since he saw it ; 2. that at any rate it was 
 not impracticable to Annie Colvile, 5 who did it in its worst 
 state 
 
 5 Wife of his brother-in-law, Mr. the return journey he took a shorter 
 Eden Colvile, who was Governor of the route (with more snow-shoe travelling 
 Red River Settlement from 184910 1852. over the mountains, and less canoe) 
 Mr. Colvile's district included Van- which occupied only three months. He 
 couver Island on the other side of the had arranged to meet Mrs. Colvile at 
 Rocky Mountains, and in one visit to Fort Garry, in the Red River Settle- 
 Vancouver he spent four months in get- ment, and she was to start from Mon- 
 ting there, travelling every day and all treal on a given day. They came into 
 day by the lakes, with portages, and Fort Garry from opposite directions on 
 down the Frazer River, with no com- the same afternoon, 
 panions but the Indian canoe-men. On
 
 1870 LAST YEARS OF OFFICIAL LIFE 283 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 September 25, 1870. 
 
 I saw Monsell fresh from France. He is a devoted admirer 
 of Trochu, who, he says, is a religious Breton of the Montalem- 
 bert school, a determined, honest, first-rate man. He had seen 
 him when he went through Paris early in August. He says 
 what struck him was the fixed expression of sadness which 
 never left his countenance or changed in the least, like stone, 
 though he was speaking with great eloquence and animation. 
 It was a long time before the Emperor's Government could 
 make up its mind to employ him, and only in extremity. 
 Till the ' personal government ' was gone he was most 
 desponding, now (he implied) he felt that at least France was 
 free to exert herself. 
 
 You see that Lord Lyons has brought the King of Prussia 
 and Favre together, which is a step. 
 
 To Lady Rogers. 
 
 Binsted Wyck : G October 16, 1870. 
 
 My dear Mother, You will like to see the enclosed. 
 Please to send it back. I have written something for his 
 Lordship on the bombardment, rather too rhetorical, and 
 wanting to be chastised before it is sent, if it is capable of 
 being sent to Bismarck, and I am waiting to see what comes 
 of it. 7 I expect it may be useful in furnishing some phrases 
 or single thoughts, but that it is too undiplomatic to be capable 
 of use bodily. I have not got hold of the Foreign Office slang 
 or the diplomatic proprieties. I am afraid he is rather bad 
 with his gout. His last letter to me ended ' Yours goutily, G.' 
 
 I am glad to be in relations with him again of course, this 
 is all the deepest of secrets. 
 
 My draft hinged on the consideration that as bombard- 
 ment had been useless at Strasburg it would be wanton in 
 Paris, and therefore a blot on an otherwise noble history (that 
 
 6 He was staying with Mr. Wickham, gestions for a despatch from the English 
 the present M.P. for East Hants. Government to the Prussian deprecating 
 
 7 He had been asked by Lord Gran- a bombardment of Paris, 
 ville (now Foreign Minister) to draftsug-
 
 284 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vm 
 
 of the present war) and of course a spring of inextinguishable 
 hatred between France and Germany for generations. . . . 
 
 This is a very pretty place, and our host and hostess are 
 so pleasant that it is a particularly agreeable visit. . . . The 
 features of the country are broadish valleys with coombes 
 running into them, at the head of one of which and on the 
 hill the house is placed one of those houses that have grown 
 up like Blachford, but into a shape more according to modern 
 taste, with gables and oriel windows, with a terrace in front 
 and water meadows, which form the two sides of the coombe 
 below, and a sweep of distance with a front ground of woody 
 slopes beyond. The meadow, fringed with wood, on which I 
 am looking, has a good deal the look of an ' alp/ one of those 
 little pastures which you find in Switzerland ; and, to give it 
 more of a Swiss taste, he has put one or two bells on his cows, 
 which he says they like very much, and which he has been 
 extremely proud to find useful, as in a foggy morning and on 
 a great irregular zigzag run of meadow it helps the dairyman 
 to find out where they are. We are surrounded by friends, 
 Rickards and Palmer, and I think others within a few 
 miles. . . . 
 
 I intend, if as I suppose I am asked, to dine with the 
 Lord Mayor on November 9 to hear what Gladstone says. I 
 suppose he will say something, and it will be a very goodly 
 dinner. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 F. R. 
 
 To Lady Rogers. 
 
 October 21, 1870. 
 
 What a mess those Frenchmen are making of it ! I must 
 say that, though 1 keenly desire peace, I find it impossible to 
 have much sympathy with such a set of vapourers as those at 
 the head of affairs or those to whose silly vanity the leaders 
 are obliged to pander. I do most heartily sympathise with 
 and pity the poor peasantry who have to pay for it all. 
 Georgie was reading me yesterday a long letter from a French 
 lady in Sedan, sister of the Protestant minister there, which 
 was full of pathos. But one is used to the horrors, and I 
 think what touched me almost most of all was the grief of a
 
 1870 LAST YEARS OF OFFICIAL LIFE 285 
 
 poor peasant woman who was bringing her pet cow to be 
 butchered. ' Oh ! madame, la pauvre bete, elle s'est opposed, 
 elle ne le comprend pas, et puis je 1'avais elevee de la mere et 
 elle ne connait que moi. Ah, mon Dieu, quel malheur, tout ! 
 ils prennent tout ! il faudra done mourir de faim ! ' This was 
 said to the writer, Mile. Gulden, who is nursing the wounded, 
 relieving the starving, and so on. She is full of gratitude for 
 what the English are doing, in money or otherwise ; says the 
 Prussians are individually well behaved and steady, some 
 officers ' tout ce qu'il y a de plus poli et convenable,' but the 
 system and Governor frightfully grinding and hard. One 
 Prussian officer who calls on them (the Guldens), and often 
 spends the evening with them, ' apporte lui-meme de 1'argent 
 aux pauvres incendies de ce malheureux Bazeilles.' 
 
 She says she found some of the poor people of Bazeilles 
 paid to look after the Bavarian wounded and doing it with the 
 greatest kindness, not charging their miseries on the soldiers, 
 but saying ' c'est tout Bismarck.' 
 
 And in their case it was the soldiers, Bavarians, who she 
 says are not bad in themselves, but after battle ' n'ont ni frein 
 ni loi.' It is a remarkable letter, so strangely just and 
 measured, and accepting what has passed as a judgment on 
 them all for their lying, luxury, and frivolity. 
 
 I should like to know whether she is an example of the 
 old Huguenots. Sedan, you remember, was the Duke of 
 Bouillon's headquarters and of course the great Protestant 
 stronghold. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 F. R. 
 
 To Lady Rogers. 
 
 Walmer Castle : October 31, 1870. 
 
 My dear Mother, We came down in the train with a 
 Prussian attache, or Secretary of Legation, Count Kuserow, 
 who was bound, like ourselves, to the Castle, and is staying 
 here with us. The rest of the party are : Mr. Fullerton 
 (husband of Lady Georgina Fullerton, the novelist, Lord 
 Granville's sister) and a Mr. Wetherall Roman Catholic like
 
 286 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vm 
 
 Fullerton, and a clever man a clerk in the War Office, 
 and of the Dollinger and Acton school ; editor or something 
 of the kind of the Roman Catholic Anti-ultramontane Review 
 which the Pope at one time censured. 
 
 The Prussian is a Prussian all over : civil, self-satisfied, 
 correct, continuous in his conversation, speaking English 
 correctly and with ease but tant soit peu heavy. Of course, 
 he precludes a good many subjects ; but yesterday morning, 
 when he was out of the way, Lord Granville b.egan about the 
 war. He said that he had more hope of peace than the 
 newspapers, though, of course, not sanguine ; that when both 
 Governments desired it there was always hope that it would 
 come, and that both did desire it now. He observed that it 
 was all very well to talk of England going for nothing, but 
 that here we had all the neutrals ready to do what we liked, 
 France of course anxious, and Prussia, after all its cries 
 against neutral mediation, not ill pleased that we should 
 come forward. He said he heard from surgeons and others 
 that the German army had had quite enough of it and 
 wanted peace. (And Herbert of the C.O. told me that a 
 sister of his passing through Germany found people also 
 of that mind. All cried out for peace, and told her that 
 we (the English) did not know what they had suffered in 
 loss of lives.) They evidently hide the amount of 
 loss. Kuserow implied that Bernstorff had no relatives 
 lost, but Lord G. was down on him at once with a nephew 
 here and a wife's cousin there, and other family losses. 
 And it must be so. There is a good hope that it will sicken 
 them. 
 
 He says Bismarck hates us as a centre of constitutional- 
 ism, and affects to depreciate us as powerless ' an old red 
 rag.' 
 
 Lord G. evidently has no love for the Prussians, and is a 
 little inclined to make the best of the French always except 
 the Due de Grammont. 
 
 I have been in the habit of defending the French on the 
 ground of Grammont's volunteer to Lord Lyons of a written 
 declaration that if so and so were done ' tout 1'incident est 
 termine.' But he, Lord G., quotes Grammont as saying that
 
 1S70 LAST YEARS OF OFFICIAL LIFE 287 
 
 there were twenty ways out of it, but that Le Bceuf would 
 have the war, declaring that he was ready. So Grammont 
 upset the coach. 
 
 The Empress seems to have said to Lord Cowley that it 
 was due to the weakness of the Emperor i.e. this not 
 insisting on his own opinion, which was in favour of peace. 
 She added, ' I admit that I was too warlike. . . .' 
 
 I was amused at a saying of old Brunnow, the Russian 
 Ambassador. t He observed to Lord G. that Thiers had gone 
 round to all the neutrals, just so as to avoid the dangers of 
 the siege. Lord G. said the same thought had passed his 
 own mind, but that he had dismissed it as improper and 
 unjust. ' Moi pas,' Brunnow replied ; then he added : ' Moi, 
 j'aurais faitautant' (pause). ' II n'est pas donne" a tout le 
 monde d'etre heros ' (pause). ' II y avait Regulus.' To 
 appreciate it you should know the look of the man a great, 
 big, old, stumping mountain with a great sallow ponderous 
 face, but a dry twinkle in his eye, which lighted up at the 
 whimsicality of going back to some 300 B.C. to look for 
 a man to whom it had been given to be a hero. 
 
 G. was amused at a little passage of arms between 
 Lord Granville and Kuserow. She, Lady Granville, and 
 Kuserow, were sitting talking at one end of the room after 
 dark, and Lord Granville was working in the other corner, 
 when they heard him say in his most velvety voice, ' I see 
 that 30,000 rifles and 200,000 cartridges are being shipped in 
 the United States for France.' (Of course, you know that 
 Bismarck is getting up a feeling in Germany against England 
 for allowing the export of arms &c., in which they are quite 
 wrong, as our doings are consistent with international law, 
 and just like what Prussia did for Russia during the Crimea.) 
 Kuserow said, ' I hope we shall catch them before they reach 
 France ' (pause) ; then Lord G., ' I wonder when you intend 
 to make a remonstrance against it.' Kuserow then took up 
 the gauntlet and began explaining somehow that there 
 were obligations between us and Prussia which did not exist 
 with the United States (pause again) ; then Lord Granville, 
 silkier than ever, ' What I don't quite understand is when you 
 changed your minds.' The Prussian was quick enough to
 
 288 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vin 
 
 catch his meaning, laughed, and said, ' Ah ! you mean about 
 the Crimea,' and shut up. 
 
 He Kuserow is a great Bismarckian, and apparently 
 considers that there is to be a remodification of German 
 parties, Bismarck (as I infer) giving up the old ' Specific 
 Prussian ' party, as it is called there (the ' Chauvins ' of 
 France, and ' Codini ' of Italy), who are for mere Prussian 
 objects and unmitigated absolutism, and placing himself at 
 the head of what we should call a ' Liberal-Conservative ' party, 
 with German (as distinct from Prussian) objects. All I can 
 say is that, if his memoirs are true (which Kuserow says they 
 are in the main), it will be a considerable change. 
 
 He dropped one thing, which seemed as if he expected 
 an arrangement between Prussia and Russia embracing 
 Constantinople. Dawdling about on Sunday, he picked up 
 a volume of Macaulay's Essays, in which he described the 
 Parisians at the entry of the Allies in 1814, in a way which 
 was a wonderfully severe and accurate anticipation of their 
 behaviour now. Presently he came up again : ' I am falling 
 on one remarkable thing after another. I find what I never 
 knew before ' (he had taken up Cobden's political writings) 
 ' that Cobden advocated abandoning Constantinople to Russia,' 
 and he proceeded to announce that he should buy the 
 book. 
 
 An agreement to that purpose between Prussia and 
 Russia is, as I suppose you know, what France threatens us 
 with in case we neglect to help her. 
 
 Lord Granville showed me a letter from Count d'Haus- 
 sonville sending most warm thanks for Colonel Loyd Lindsay's 
 2O,ooo/., but pouring scorn on our diplomatists (English) and 
 Government for their inaction : ' On rit d'eux.' They think 
 they can flout us into folly, as they would be able to flout one 
 another. 
 
 There, it is getting to luncheon time, and my eyes are 
 complaining. We stay here till to-morrow, when Lord and 
 Lady Granville go up to town themselves for a fort- 
 night. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 F. R.
 
 1870 LAST YEARS OF OFFICIAL LIFE 289 
 
 P.S. When Lord Canning went to India, he dined with 
 Lord Ellenborough to be coached. Lord Ellenborough said 
 he would find the work unremitting. ' Most men,' he said, 
 ' grow a beard when they go to a hot climate ; I did not, and 
 I found my practice valuable, for while I was shaving was the 
 only time I had to throw my mind on the whole of India.' He 
 declared that he had never read over a despatch which he had 
 written except that which was a reply to the despatch recall- 
 ing him. Lord Granville asked the Prussian which they 
 thought the best general, Prince Frederick Charles or the 
 Crown Prince. He said that no one gave the Crown Prince 
 credit for military ability till after the Danish war ; that he 
 then greatly interested himself in the soldiers, went about 
 among them, and so on, and then got a command and credit 
 in the Austrian campaign ; but he said (cautiously and justly) 
 that you could not judge which was best till you set them to 
 manoeuvre troops without a chef cTttat at their elbow. At 
 present each has close to him one of the best generals in the 
 Prussian army. 
 
 To Lady Rogers. 
 
 1 8 Radnor Place : December 14, 1870^ 
 
 My dear Mother, We had a pleasant dinner party 
 yesterday. Doyle was very amusing : one story is worth 
 repeating. 
 
 Talbot, the head of Keble College, is a very good scholar, 
 but a bad driver. The other day he took out Prince Hassan, 
 the son of the Khedive (as they call him now), who is getting 
 an Oxford education to fit him for the Pachalik at Cairo 
 and upset him into a ditch. The next day, driving out 
 again, he caught up Liddon taking his constitutional, and 
 pulled up to ask him to take a seat. Liddon also pulled up, 
 and replied, ' What ! intendest thou to kill me as thou killedst 
 that Egyptian yesterday ? ' 
 
 I got into a great fight right and left about Gambetta, 
 whom I believe to be a most abominable impostor. To 
 prove him a great man, one of the company told the story 
 that when he was a boy his father sent him to a Jesuit school, 
 he declaring that if he was sent he would put his eyes out. 
 
 u
 
 2QO LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vm 
 
 He was sent, and before long the tutor wrote to his father 
 that the boy was very ill, and must be looked to. When the 
 father came, he found that the boy had put out, by some 
 means or other, one eye, and announced that if he were not 
 taken away he would put out the other, on which the father 
 yielded. 
 
 It seems that he was as little able to take care of himself 
 then as he is to take care of France now, and that what 
 he should have done to himself he is doing to France. It 
 has lost one eye, and he is putting out the other. 
 
 The Foreign Office are, I am afraid, in anxiety about this 
 Luxemburg business. It seems to me very ugly, not so 
 much on account of Luxemburg, which does not signify to 
 us, as from the menacing way in which Prussia announces her 
 intention. It seems as much as to say, ' We are determined 
 to quarrel with you ; Russia has given you a kick, and some- 
 how or other you have managed to satisfy yourself with a 
 half apology ; take this from us ; and if this kick is not 
 sufficient, we will try another.' 
 
 I hear from a German by extraction, who has lately 
 been through Germany, that the nation is terribly tired of the 
 war. This ought to be all in favour of peace. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS. 
 
 To Lady Rogers. 
 
 1 8 Radnor Place : January 12, 1871. 
 
 My dear Mother, Yesterday I had an interesting after- 
 noon with the Stanleys, who asked Georgie and myself to 
 meet Pere Hyacinthe at tea, half-past five. There was no one 
 but him, so we had a real talk instead of just being introduced 
 and saying some banalit^s. The defect of the proceeding was 
 that I found myself talking instead of listening, which, though 
 good exercise in French, was not what I wanted ; but some- 
 how or other I found myself in for it. I think the Pere was 
 rather tired of being trotted out. Anyhow they began on 
 Newman, whom he had just been visiting, and whom, I think, 
 he wanted to understand. That set me off, and Stanley kept
 
 1871 LAST YEARS OF OFFICIAL LIFE 291 
 
 putting things in that made me more~and more go on. What 
 I now think he wanted to judge of was how far Newman 
 would be prepared to join in any manifesto against Infallibility 
 (not that he so put it), and Stanley wanted so to turn the 
 conversation as to illustrate that point. He had made up his 
 mind that Newman would not take a leading part in any such 
 move, whatever he might think, and could not have been 
 encouraged by what I told him of Newman's almost super- 
 stitious desire (as it used to be) to obey authority implicitly 
 when it would speak out. 
 
 However, at last he began to talk himself about the Infalli- 
 bility the dogine as they call it and the Council. He said 
 that the Council originally had passed a decree condemning 
 all Protestants as unbelievers, deists, atheists, and everything 
 else that is bad (which I imagine the Pope does annually), and 
 that they would not hear with patience, and hardly hear at all, 
 Strossmayer the great liberal Archbishop j3n the other side, 
 almost hooting him. But that Baron Arnim, the Prussian 
 Minister, asked what he was to do if this were passed and 
 published. The Prussian Government wrote back, Leave 
 Rome, in that case, at once. This he told the Pope, and the 
 decree (or whatever they call it) was heard no more of. 
 
 He thought the war was in favour of Infallibility ; that if 
 men had had nothing else to think of, they would have thought 
 of that, and there would have been discussions taking place, 
 and opinions settled while the questions were fresh and 
 people's minds open. But he thinks that in a year it will be 
 an old story and people will be reconciled to the status quo, 
 i.e. to the new doctrine as established. 
 
 He seemed to expect nothing from the Bishops (except 
 perhaps Strossmayer), not a great deal from the clergy, but an 
 opposition widespread but more or less what he called sourde 
 among the laity, and a disbelief in it wider than the opposition, 
 what he called a schisme latent. 
 
 He did not speak of the war, but I hear he told the 
 Stanleys (with whom he is living) that the exasperation in 
 France was demoralising. He said he had received a letter 
 from a moderate man, who expressed his hopes that the King 
 of Prussia would be assassinated. 
 
 u 2
 
 292 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. VIM 
 
 He is rather a short man, broadly made, with a broad but 
 even-cut face, with a well-proportioned, powerful look, dark 
 hair with a touch of grey, eye dark and intelligent rather 
 than thoughtful or piercing, and a fresh healthy colour rather 
 what I should call an intelligent Belgian physiognomy than a 
 French one. 
 
 There was no touch of vapouring or pretence, nothing of 
 
 the platform or showy conversationalist 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS. 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 1 8 Radnor Place : January 30, 1871. 
 
 I do not know that I have much that is cheerful to tell 
 you, except what you see in the papers, which is certainly a 
 very great relief. What the I5th of February is to produce 
 for France, God knows. Peace I take it for granted a 
 republic, I suppose, but under whom ? Never I suppose was 
 a great nation called on to pronounce on its own fate with so 
 little notion whom it could trust, or whom it ought to place 
 in the saddle. I cannot imagine their adhering to Gambetta, 
 or he to them. It becomes material to ask now, what was 
 the ' pact with death ' to which he told us he was party. 
 It seems at first sight that Death will have a right to consider 
 himself ill-treated and thrown over. 
 
 I am very glad the Prussians do not enter Paris ; there is, 
 I will not say a generosity, but an absence of ungenerosity 
 about it which is a shade better than I expected : no doubt, 
 they are themselves too anxious for peace to risk driving 
 Favre and Trochu further into a corner. 
 
 You see Mozley is Regius Professor of Divinity. Glad- 
 stone sent for me to talk about it, and asked me what I 
 thought of M.'s prospects as a Professor. Then he began on 
 me about my retirement. ' Surely you are not going to ' etc., 
 ' having made for yourself such a position as you have,' and 
 then he said that all my chiefs spoke so highly etc., and 
 when I afterwards used the phrase that they had all been 
 ' very kind to me,' he said in a kind of Marry, come up ' way, 
 * I should think so.'
 
 1871 LAST YEARS OF OFFICIAL LIFE 293 
 
 I keep thinking that in eleven hours (it is now I P.M.) 
 I shall be entitled to retire on a pension. 
 
 W. Froude is up and down here, about an Admiralty 
 commission on which he is sitting. It is to discuss, as far as 
 I see, ship- building in general, shapes, armour, sizes, etc. etc. 
 He seems to like it much and says that the sailors and men 
 of science of whom it is composed work well together. It is 
 to be hoped they will keep us straight, and make our ditch 
 impassable to Prussians or any one else. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 F. R. 
 
 To the Rev. R. W. Church. 
 
 1 8 Radnor Place : February i, 1871. 
 
 Gladstone said to me of you, ' His refusal of the Worcester 
 Canonry was from a most generous feeling, but it was very 
 unwise.' Of course I am aware that it was not a question of what 
 is called ' wisdom/ and I more entered into your feelings about 
 that refusal than, I think, about any other. But putting it 
 together with what had just passed, it made me understand 
 what old placemongers say, that it is such a step to have some- 
 thing that is worth giving away. The Worcester Canonry a 
 valu the Professorship to Mozley. You remember the old 
 Cardinal who, with no recommendation, had had all the ' best ' 
 things of the Roman Church, and told some one who wanted 
 an explanation, that he had never spoken evil of anybody 
 and never refused anything. 
 
 So we have come to the opening of the last Act at Paris. 
 I suppose the revocation by the Paris Government of the 
 delegation to its Bordeaux offshoot is required by Bismarck, 
 But what will it lead to ? Gambetta will scarcely consent to 
 be left en /'air. And if not, shall we have peace in the 
 North between Germany and what Germany considers the 
 lawful Government, and fighting in esse or posse between 
 Germany and what Germany considers in the South an 
 unauthorised collection of brigands ? Or will the National 
 Convention really meet and make peace ? 
 
 How the history of parties and countries in the present 
 day illustrates the way in which the personal qualities of
 
 294 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vm 
 
 bodies of men bring their own rewards and punishments 
 with them, by guiding them in the choice of their guides. 
 The French and the Conservatives desire to be deceived and 
 to say what it is pleasant to say, to think what it is pleasant to 
 think, and to hear what it is pleasant to hear, and are a prey 
 
 to Gambetta and Disraeli And yet has not the genuine 
 
 enthusiasm of the Italians for each other's freedom produced 
 on the whole a degree of respectability in the government 
 which was hardly to be expected from men whose raison 
 d'etre was (from one point of view) to take what did not 
 belong to them ? 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 March 13, 1871. 
 
 Perhaps you saw that some of Cook's excursionists were 
 
 caught at Paris. Miss was one of them, and after the 
 
 massacre thought it high time to make off, so with a kind of 
 English hobbledehoy who was attached to her (as a com- 
 panion, not a lover) she took her bag and posted off to the 
 railway station. 
 
 They met a lot of insurgent Nationals marching along the 
 trottoir, who called out Chaussee, Chaussee, but the English 
 youth, not understanding that he was expected to go into the 
 gutter, held on his way. On this the front fellows brought 
 down their bayonets upon him, to which action, without yield- 
 ing ground, he replied by the ebullition ' I say, mister, don't 
 you go poking at me.' Something, I suppose (and can easily 
 conceive), in his manner set the Nationals in a violent fit 
 of laughter, and they let him have his way. I call this 
 maintaining the character of England in every sense of the 
 phrase. 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 Athenaeum Club : May 19, 1871. 
 
 My dear Kate, Here I am half-way home, after having 
 finally quitted my room in Downing Street. It has been an 
 odd feeling of pain and pleasure. It is a real pleasure to be 
 free, and a real pleasure to be so kindly parted with. I have 
 cither sought or been sought by nearly all the members of the 
 Office, and have heard a complimentary amount of regrets. The 
 packing up of books and burning papers and handing over
 
 1871 LAST YEARS OF OFFICIAL LIFE 295 
 
 of memoranda is a dismal kind of ceremony, and parting with 
 work in which I have been for so long I may almost say 
 exclusively occupied, and with men with whom I have con- 
 tracted such friendly relations now of so many years' stand- 
 ing is pathetic, so that just at present the retrospective and 
 rather sad side is uppermost. And when I feel that to- 
 morrow I shall wake to a holiday, the thought suggests itself 
 ' And what shall I do with it ? ' 
 
 However, I shall be a good deal surprised if that lasts 
 long. 
 
 Work for the last two or three days I have really had 
 none, but the succession of interviews at first rather reviving 
 has got a little tiring, and I feel as if I could not set my 
 mind to considering whether I have anything worth telling. 
 I incline to think I have not. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 FREDERIC ROGERS. 
 
 In 1871, at the age of sixty, he resigned his post and 
 retired on a pension. It is believed that Lord Granville 
 particularly desired him to fill the post of Under-Secretary 
 for Foreign Affairs. But he did not wish any longer to con- 
 tinue the heavy strain of official work, a strain which he had 
 felt the more from the constant weakness of his eyes, and he 
 held to his purpose of taking his well-earned rest in country 
 life. It happened too that at this time his mother died, and 
 this made him the more anxious to settle down at Blachford 
 and carry on the management of the property which had been 
 hers since his father's death. 
 
 At this point, when he finally severed his long connexion 
 with colonial administration, a brief account of colonial history 
 as it came before him, extracted from notes of autobiography 
 which he left, will be useful both to indicate the opinions 
 which he entertained and to explain some of the letters which 
 follow. 
 
 ' The matters which come before the Colonial Office are 
 by the nature of the case in great part official details and 
 controversies even of the most petty kind It is, of course, a
 
 296 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vm 
 
 great thing that in all these controversies, whether between 
 private persons and officials, or among officials themselves, 
 the Colonial Office should maintain a reputation for justice, 
 as an accessible Court of Appeal. And this gives interest to 
 small cases. And it is more interesting, though more rare, 
 to watch the development of principles. Two such I should 
 particularly note as having established themselves during my 
 acquaintance with the Colonial Office colonial self-govern- 
 ment, and the emancipation of the colonial Churches. 
 
 ' Fifty years 8 ago the colonies were divided in general 
 into two classes Crown colonies, in which the Crown was 
 almost absolute, and colonies having representative institutions, 
 that is to say, colonies in which money could not be granted or 
 laws passed without the consent of an elected assembly. The 
 executive government was in all cases alike composed of 
 permanent officers appointed by the Crown. 
 
 ' To this limitation of the colonists' power the Canadians 
 first objected, and it was determined in Canada and the other 
 N. American colonies to establish what is called responsible 
 government, under which the executive government is 
 composed of persons who command the confidence of the 
 local legislature. This is, of course, the English Constitution 
 the Governor, like the Queen, being obliged (except in a 
 few matters of Imperial interest) to endorse the action of his 
 Ministry, and being unable to exercise any authority without 
 them. The full extent of the principle thus conceded was not 
 at once understood, nor did it extend beyond N. America : 
 for the establishment of such institutions in the West Indies 
 (where certain representative institutions existed) would have 
 been ruinous, and Australia was as yet comparatively unim- 
 portant. 
 
 ' But wherever there was a vigorous and heterogeneous 
 white population, a demand arose, which it would have been 
 impossible, if it had been advisable, to resist, for this form of 
 government, which, as in America, unavoidably and rapidly 
 developed into practical independence : the Governor (the 
 only remaining link between the colony and the mother 
 country) being in essentials little more than the ambassador 
 
 8 This was written about 1885.
 
 1871 LAST YEARS OF OFFICIAL LIFE 297 
 
 of a great State to a weaker, with which it is on terms of 
 close alliance, and which relies on the protection of the more 
 powerful. 
 
 ' On the other hand the mother country, while abandon- 
 ing all local authority, soon began to decline the responsibility 
 of local defence, and has withdrawn her troops from British 
 North America, Australia, New Zealand and the Cape Colony. 
 This great establishment of colonial independence cannot (as 
 I think) be justly or wisely or possibly arrested. 
 
 1 Of the growth of the Australian colonies, and of their 
 independence consequent on that growth, I had been witness 
 at the Emigration Office. During the fourteen years I had 
 been in that Office, I had been concerned with my colleagues 
 in sending out upwards of half a million emigrants to 
 Australia and New Zealand. When I joined (in 1846) the 
 population of New South Wales, including the then unimpor- 
 tant district of Port Philip, was considerably under 200,000. 
 Before I left the Emigration Office (in 1861) it had risen to 
 nearly 800,000. Its wealth had increased pari passu and so 
 had its independence. The Australian colonies had received 
 responsible government, had enacted their own constitutions, 
 and, excepting that they were not entitled to repeal Imperial 
 statutes expressly intended to apply to them, had become 
 free from all practical interference with their legislature. Of 
 this constitutional progress (extending to all the Australian 
 colonies, and embracing at last Western Australia) I was 
 especially cognisant, as having to examine and report on all 
 their laws. 
 
 ' The moral difficulty in the abandonment of all this 
 authority was the difficulty of securing the protection of 
 coloured races, who are always exterminated by Anglo-Saxons 
 in temperate climates, and yet are incapable of receiving 
 more than an illusory share in the government. 
 
 ' Lord Grey was possessed with the idea that it was prac- 
 ticable to give representative institutions, and then to stop 
 without giving responsible government something like the 
 English Constitution under Elizabeth and the Stuarts. He 
 did not understand either the vigorous independence of an 
 Anglo-Saxon community or the weakness of an executive
 
 298 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vm 
 
 which represents a democracy. So events took their own 
 course, and left his theories behind. 
 
 ' When the natives were so few that they gave no trouble 
 to the colonists, matters went on without a check. Complete 
 independence in local affairs was given, and British troops 
 were withdrawn. But in New Zealand and the Cape it was 
 otherwise. In each of these colonies the colonists required 
 our protection, and the question arose on what terms we 
 should continue it, or whether we should withdraw it. 
 
 ' In New Zealand the danger arose from the desire of the 
 colonists to acquire land, and the growing indisposition to 
 part with it, except at increasingly high prices. The Govern- 
 ment proposed the establishment of a kind of land court, 
 composed of the Governor and a few persons in whom the 
 natives would confide, and acting, not under the authority of 
 the colonial government, whose capacity the natives at that 
 time distrusted, but under that of the Queen, whom they 
 respected. 
 
 ' This was approved in the Colonial Office, and a Bill, 
 prepared by me, was introduced into Parliament, but rejected 
 without division, because it was held that the colony was 
 entitled in that, as in other matters, to manage its own 
 affairs ; from which it followed that they were to have abso- 
 lute power of bringing on wars of which we were to pay the 
 cost, and that they would be under a constant temptation, 
 which they were not likely to resist, to pick a quarrel with 
 the natives, and clear them out at our expense. 
 
 ' Simultaneously a war did break out provoked, I should 
 say, by high-handed dealings of the colonists which led to 
 the employment, with little credit to us, of ridiculously large 
 bodies of troops, the destruction of the tribe which was most 
 advanced among the Maoris in civilisation, and whose territory 
 presented the greatest temptation to cupidity, and the appro- 
 priation of their land. For myself, I at once made up my mind 
 that there would be no quiet for ourselves or safety for the 
 natives until our troops were recalled and the colonists forced 
 to rely on their own resources, and to try mild and just methods 
 rather than violent ones. . . . Eventually the last regiment 
 was withdrawn, and we had no more trouble with the Maoris.
 
 1871 LAST YEARS OF OFFICIAL LIFE 299 
 
 ' The case of the Cape was very different in one respect 
 In New Zealand the colonists were equal in number, or nearly 
 so, to the natives, and were increasing, while the natives were 
 diminishing ; there was therefore no reason why they should 
 not be forced to defend themselves. In Africa the natives 
 were far more numerous, and increased, when not thinned by 
 war, faster than the colonists. And, the executive being still, 
 according to Lord Grey's policy, in the hands of the Home 
 Government, it was possible to exercise a very efficient con- 
 trol on native policy. The colonists seemed to require more 
 protection for themselves, and allowed the Government to 
 protect the natives. But here difficulties arose in the general 
 government. The finances got into disorder, and Sir P. 
 Wodehouse declared that the Home Government (i.e. him- 
 self) could, with the existing constitution, do nothing. He 
 was told that if he could prevail on the colonists to reform 
 the constitution so as to give the Crown the requisite power, 
 he, and they, might do so. . . 
 
 ' If, on the other hand, the government were changed to 
 a " responsible " government, the question was whether (as 
 troops would not be supplied to a responsible government) 
 this alteration would not be the signal for native war. But 
 it was thought and I think that events have not at present 
 disproved the supposition that the white population was 
 sufficiently varied in their interests and sufficiently intelligent 
 to avoid native wars if they must pay for them ; and it was 
 decided that they should have responsible government. . . . 
 [At the time of the Zulu War] this policy was reversed, and 
 the system was re-introduced of war carried on at the expense 
 of the British Treasury. . . . [Since that period] it was 
 decided that we might safely give the government of the 
 colony to the colonists. The final step was taken by Lord 
 Kimberley after I left the Colonial Office. 
 
 ' I had always believed and the belief has so confirmed and 
 consolidated itself that I can hardly realise the possibility of 
 any one seriously thinking the contrary that the destiny of 
 our colonies is independence ; and that, in this point of view, 
 the function of the Colonial Office is to secure that our con- 
 nexion, while it lasts, shall be as profitable to both parties,
 
 3oo LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vm 
 
 and our separation, when it comes, as amicable as possible. 
 This opinion is founded first on the general principle that a 
 spirited nation (and a colony becomes a nation) will not sub- 
 mit to be governed in its internal affairs by a distant Govern- 
 ment, and that nations geographically remote have no such 
 common interests as will bind them permanently together in 
 foreign policy, with all its details and mutations. 
 
 ' This being so, and a colony being regarded as the seat 
 of a nation, the Colonial Office presented an interesting set of 
 successive developments, by which the seed grew into a 
 forest tree. First there was, as I have described, the personal 
 government of the Governor, instructed by the Colonial Office ; 
 then came a purely legislative council, nominated by him ; 
 then a part of this legislative council became the instrument 
 of an informal kind of representation, a means of feeling and 
 in some degree conforming to public opinion ; then part of 
 it became elective a minority, but an influential minority ; 
 then came the separation into a nominated and an elective 
 chamber (called, as I have said, representative institutions) ; 
 then responsible government, placing the executive in the 
 hands of persons practically nominated, as in England, by 
 the community ; then, in Canada, the addition of status and 
 weight given by confederation. 
 
 ' The scheme of confederation floated about for some little 
 time as an idea. Among other persons who took it up was 
 a Mr. Howe, a popular leader in Nova Scotia. But it took no 
 substance till it was adopted by Sir John Macdonald, the ex- 
 ceedingly able Premier of Canada. In that colony the French 
 were so large a minority (if indeed in mere numbers they were 
 a minority) that government became almost impracticable, 
 and he adopted the idea of confederation with New Brunswick 
 and Nova Scotia, separating, however, Upper and Lower 
 Canada, so that the French should be predominant in the latter 
 their own province while the union of New Brunswick and 
 Nova Scotia would make the British predominant in the 
 Union. This involved a new constitution containing guarantees 
 sufficient to ensure that the dominant party in the" Dominion," 
 as it was to be, should not be able to withdraw the privileges 
 given to the French province of Lower Canada. In this
 
 1871 LAST YEARS OF OFFICIAL LIFE 301 
 
 arrangement the French agreed, and their leader, Mr. Cartier 
 (afterwards Sir G. Cartier), joined Macdonald in a ministry 
 which was to carry it into effect. They framed an Act to 
 be carried in the Imperial Parliament, and a large deputation 
 from the proposed four provinces, with Macdonald (and 
 Cartier) at their head, came to England to settle details with 
 the Secretary of State. The delegates were ministers of their 
 respective provinces, the legislatures of which addressed the 
 Crown praying that the Act might be passed. 
 
 ' But meantime Howe had changed his views. His enemies 
 said that he did not see his way to such advantages for himself 
 as he had hoped for in confederation. At any rate, he was 
 not in the delegacy nor in the provincial ministry. And not 
 being so, he agitated the province 'through its length and 
 breadth," and came to England loaded with petitions against 
 a change which would transfer them the most ancient and 
 loyal North American colony from theallegiance of the Crown 
 to that of a Canadian ministry. All this was done in the most 
 approved platform style, and h.e spouted in public and inter 
 viewed in private with all the usual evidence of being the 
 mouthpiece of the people of Nova Scotia. True, the people 
 through the legislature had expressed themselves differently, 
 and their ministers were pressing confederation on the Home 
 Government. But there was all the usual evidence that the 
 people had changed their minds, and that Mr. Howe was the 
 people. 
 
 ' However, he could not arrest the progress of the negotia- 
 tions. It was, I should say, under Mr. Cardwell's rule that the 
 project was matured ; but it was during Lord Carnarvon's 
 secretaryship that the deputation arrived. They held many 
 meetings, at which I was always present. Lord Carnarvon 
 was in the chair, and I was rather disappointed in his power 
 of presidency. Macdonald was the ruling genius and spokes- 
 man, and I was very greatly struck by his power of manage- 
 ment and adroitness. The French delegates were keenly on 
 the watch for anything which weakened their securities ; on 
 the contrary, the Nova Scotia and New Brunswick delegates 
 were very jealous of concession to the arrieree province ; while 
 one main stipulation in favour of the French was open to
 
 302 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vm 
 
 constitutional objections on the part of the Home Govern- 
 ment. 
 
 ' Macdonald had to argue the question with the Home 
 Government on a point on which the slightest divergence from 
 the narrow line already agreed on in Canada was watched for 
 here by the French, and there by the English as eager dogs 
 watch a rat hole ; a snap on one side might have provoked a 
 snap on the other, and put an end to the concord. He stated 
 and argued the case with cool, ready fluency, while at the same 
 time you saw that every word was measured, and that while 
 he was making for a point ahead, he was never for a moment 
 unconscious of any of the rocks among which he had to steer. 
 
 ' The measure was settled and passed easily through the 
 House of Lords, introduced in a good speech by Lord Car- 
 narvon. This done, or soon after it was done, Lord Carnarvon 
 left office, and was succeeded by the Duke of Buckingham. 
 One day, probably while the measure was passing through the 
 House of Commons, the Duke came into my room and said : 
 " Well, there will be no more difficulty over Nova Scotia." The 
 measure passed, and all the colonists returned home. I was 
 curious to see what was to become of Howe. And what became 
 of him was this. 
 
 ' On his return to Nova Scotia he convened a meeting of 
 the leading malcontents, and he made them a speech. He 
 told them that he had left no stone unturned in England to 
 give effect to their wishes, but the statesmen, without distinc- 
 tion of party, were unjust and inexorable. That the time for 
 words was over, and that for deeds was come. That if they 
 intended to assert themselves, they must do it as did the 
 Fathers of American Independence. That he had drawn up 
 a declaration, pledging all the signatories to resist confederation 
 at the cost, if necessary, of their lives and fortunes. This he 
 was ready to sign the first. And this was the course which 
 he was prepared to recommend. But if they were not equal 
 to this, then a mere resistance of talk was idle, and they would 
 do well to make the best of a situation from which there was 
 no escape, and, throwing aside local jealousies, to endeavour to 
 obtain in the new confederation the weight which properly 
 belonged to Nova Scotia.
 
 1871 LAST YEARS OF OFFICIAL LIFE 303 
 
 ' Of course not one of the agitators had the most remote 
 idea of perilling a single dollar, much less life and fortune, in 
 defence of their colonial isolation, and the second alternative 
 was unanimously adopted. Mr. Howe, with the applause of 
 his fellow citizens, accepted an appointment from Government 
 
 4 So much for the development of the self-governing 
 colonies while I was at the Colonial Office. I had soon 
 come to the conclusion that the endowment of the colonial 
 Churches was not a matter to be calculated on, and my fear 
 was that in the vain attempt to perpetuate the advantage 
 which these Churches derived from their connexion with the 
 Crown, and the comparatively small endowments which they 
 possessed, either alone or in common with other Churches, 
 they would be led to make such sacrifices of their ecclesiastical 
 independence as would interfere with their energy and 
 stability. . . . 
 
 ' As endowments were one after another cut away, I suc- 
 ceeded in persuading successive Secretaries of State that 
 Churches might be allowed to organise themselves, a matter 
 in which there was much traditional jealousy ; that the 
 appointments to bishoprics to which the State contributed no 
 endowment should be left to these Churches ; and, finally, 
 that the form of creating bishoprics and appointing bishops 
 by letters patent should be abandoned. In the colonial 
 Churches, as in the colonial civil government, the changes which 
 have taken place (almost entirely within the period when I 
 was connected with colonial matters) are worth noticing. 
 Formerly there were colonial bishops appointed during plea- 
 sure by the Crown under letters patent, asserting very unam- 
 biguously the extreme form of royal supremacy. These 
 bishops were paid from imperial funds, and outside the limits 
 of their dioceses the English Church was represented by a 
 few State-paid clergy, supplemented insufficiently by the 
 S.P.G., with a grudging assistance from their people, and in 
 Canada with the considerable support of the " Clergy 
 Reserves." 
 
 ' About the year 1 843 Selwyn refused to accept the 
 Bishopric of New Zealand unless the appointment was made 
 for life, and the rampant Erastianism extirpated. This was
 
 3 o 4 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. vin 
 
 done, but the Crown still retained the creation and appoint- 
 ment of bishops, even after Miss Burdett-Coutts had set the 
 example of instituting bishoprics without State aid. The 
 independence of colonial Churches suffered from two jealousies 
 one, the apprehension that if the Church organised itself it 
 would prove a troublesome and exacting power ; the other, 
 lest ignorant or heterodox men ordained by colonial bishops 
 should, through our system of patronage, find their way to 
 English preferment. 
 
 ' Thus there was a strong official and ecclesiastical feeling 
 against any organisation in the nature of a synod, and against 
 taking the colonial episcopate from under the direct control 
 of the Crown. It was felt by some of broader views that 
 emancipation was a corollary of disestablishment, which soon 
 began in the appropriation of the Canadian Clergy Reserves. 
 Of the bishops some, like Gray and Selwyn, were keen for 
 independence, and, with more or less judgment Selwyn with 
 more, Gray with less organised their Churches with a view 
 to it. But when it came to the question of creation by letters 
 patent, and all the opportunities for official delay and ob- 
 struction and meddling, they did not generally like to give 
 up what they considered the dignity of being the Queen's 
 Bishop. When I became Under-Secretary for the Colonies, 
 I found the Duke of Newcastle quite prepared to go with 
 me, and Fulford, the Primate of Canada, fully realised the 
 advantages of a free hand. The initial processes were going 
 on everywhere. But he with my help, and I with his, first 
 clenched the matter in Canada, when, Palmer being happily 
 the leading law officer and Phillimore, I think, Queen's 
 Advocate, I got the Colonial Office to announce that colonial 
 Churches would be left to elect their own bishops, subject to 
 the necessity of obtaining what the Prayer Book calls " a 
 mandate " from the Crown, if they were consecrated in this 
 country by an English bishop. 
 
 ' What is certain is, that under the new system that of 
 free action unaided by the State the colonial Churches have 
 increased greatly, and the number of the bishops perhaps 
 rather unnecessarily. (I almost think that the chaplain of 
 St. Helena must have, or must have had, a Bishop to himself.)
 
 1871 LAST YEARS OF OFFICIAL LIFE 305 
 
 Hence, at the time when I retired from the public service, the 
 colonial Churches (with one or two exceptions, which I think 
 no longer exist) were as free as the Episcopal Church of 
 Scotland to regulate their own affairs, to choose and increase 
 the number of their bishops, and to obtain consecration in 
 the colonies if they pleased. The old letters patent were swept 
 away. 
 
 ' But the existing law of England had been framed by 
 ecclesiastical lawyers, who had a strong jealousy of colonial 
 orders, and an extreme devotion to Crown supremacy, and in 
 accordance with these views provided that no colonial clergy- 
 man should be eligible for employment in England unless 
 ordained by a bishop who had been appointed by letters 
 patent. The effect, therefore, of abolishing these letters 
 patent was to disqualify all clergy ordained by colonial 
 bishops thereafter appointed from holding preferment in 
 England or Ireland. It was quite true that an indiscriminate 
 admission of such ordinations as qualifications for English 
 preferment might have poured on us a multitude of clergymen 
 little fitted for English parishes, and the question arose 
 (shortly after I became a member of the House of Lords) 
 what security should be taken against this danger. The 
 question was complicated by a confused state of the law, and 
 embarrassed by a variety of prejudices and jealousies so 
 much so that nobody would take it up. And it was admitted 
 on all hands that I (who had brought this confusion to a 
 climax) was the proper person, if not the only person, to 
 bring in a Bill for its settlement. Having the good-will of all 
 parties, I succeeded in passing an Act, of which the principle 
 is this, that any person who has received episcopal orders, and 
 is willing to accept all the tests required from an English 
 clergyman on receiving an ecclesiastical appointment, may be 
 admitted to employment in the English Church, and the 
 status of an English clergyman, by any diocesan bishop who 
 is satisfied that his orders are valid, and that he himself is a 
 person whose admission to such status and employment is 
 advisable. The bishop's power of rejection is absolute.'
 
 306 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 CHAPTER IX 
 
 Eighteen Years (1871-1889) ; Partly Parliamentary Life ; 
 but chiefly Life at Blachford 
 
 THE letters which follow were written after his retirement 
 from office. About six months, in the autumn of 1871 
 and the following winter, were spent in travelling. On his 
 way to Italy he received a letter from Mr. Gladstone offering 
 him a peerage, which he accepted, after hesitating for some 
 time for reasons which are given in one of his letters. A 
 consequence of this acceptance was that lie was obliged to be in 
 London from time to time, when Parliament was sitting. He 
 spoke sometimes on subjects of which he had special know- 
 ledge, but not very frequently. He said himself that he did 
 not find it easy to begin parliamentary debate with any 
 prospect of success or usefulness so late in life. On various 
 parliamentary committees he did a good deal of hard and 
 useful work up to the year 1 884, when he considered himself 
 entitled, at the age of seventy-three, to rest altogether from the 
 public service ; and he was the more anxious to do so because, 
 dissenting very strongly from Mr. Gladstone's Irish policy, he 
 was no longer able to support, and found it painful to oppose, 
 his old friend and leader ; hence nearly the whole of. the last 
 five years of his life, and the greater part of the last eighteen, 
 were spent in the country. He did not find the difficulty 
 which is often supposed to exist in a change of this kind 
 from busy years of constant official work. He gave some 
 of his newly-found leisure to literary work to articles and 
 reviews for the ' Guardian ' and occasionally for other journals
 
 Heatl. Plymouth. Hioto
 
 1871 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 307 
 
 or magazines. How readily he threw himself into country 
 occupations and duties building or improving schools and 
 cottages and farms, planting or thinning woods and how 
 completely he found his enjoyment in them, is shown clearly 
 enough in his letters. 
 
 To Miss E. Marindin [Mrs. Franks}. 
 
 Hotel Bellevue, Lucerne : September 17, 1871. 
 My dear Eleanor, I am aware that I owe you a letter, 
 but hitherto I have had nothing to say that you would not 
 see better in Murray. On Thursday, however, we saw a sight 
 not in the guide-books which is worth telling you, and so I 
 shall do in Georgie's handwriting as you see (at least for the 
 most part), because I am rather on the sick list. What I 
 have to tell is a day at Einsiedeln, which you may remember 
 in ' Anne of Geierstein ' connected with the image of our Lady 
 of Einsiedeln, one of those repulsive black images of the Holy 
 Virgin which seem to be credited with an exceptional amount 
 of miracles and sanctity. I must begin with a little guide- 
 bookism. The monastery (Benedictine) must, I should think, 
 be about the oldest institution in Switzerland, having a few 
 years ago celebrated not its centenary but its millenary. It 
 is certainly older than the canton of Schwytz, which was the 
 core of the Swiss Confederation. This is pretty certain, for 
 the first that is heard in history of Schwytz is that the knowing 
 monks of Einsiedeln contrived to get from the Emperor of 
 Germany a grant of the land occupied by squatting right by 
 les homines de Schwytz, a set of sturdy savages of whom, 
 till that time, nobody had ever heard. Of course, when in 
 due time the. monks began to assert their rights, the moun- 
 taineers resisted, the case was brought before the Emperor 
 more than once, and decided in favour of the written 
 documents of the Abbot against the squatting rights of the 
 Jiommes de Schwytz. To this the Schwytzers paid no 
 attention. They were accordingly put under the ban of the 
 Empire ; to this also they paid no attention. They were then 
 excommunicated by various ecclesiastical authorities in suc- 
 cession, and their churches shut ; this they so far respected
 
 3 o8 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 as to build a little chapel, and compel their priests to celebrate 
 Mass there, but the rights of Einsiedeln they continued 
 positively to ignore. Under these circumstances the Convent, 
 the Empire, and the bishops thought it best to give up the 
 job as a bad one, and the Schwytzers were relieved from 
 imperial bans and ecclesiastical interdicts, and allowed to hold 
 their lands in peace. This little incident was characteristic of 
 the Schwytzers they never calculated odds, went at every- 
 thing, and were either destroyed or victorious. When 
 victorious (as far as I can see from a Swiss history I have 
 bought) they seem to have celebrated their victory by 
 plundering le convent des gentils Jiommes a Einsiedeln. 
 However, the Reformation seems to have changed all this : 
 Schwytz was one of the cantons which held fast to Rome, 
 and I believe now have as much reverence for Einsiedeln as 
 the rest of their Catholic neighbours. Now then for the 
 occasion of our sight. On September 14, rather more than 
 900 years ago, when the ecclesiastical authorities were 
 preparing to consecrate the church of Einsiedeln, the 
 Bishop of Constance was informed by a voice from Heaven 
 that he might dispense with the form, as the church had 
 already been consecrated in Heaven and by the presence of 
 our Saviour, who, the legend adds, had drunk of one of four- 
 teen fountains which existed on the spot. Ever since, that 
 day has been a great day at Einsiedeln, and we went to see 
 it. We started from a place called Brunnen on the Lake of 
 Lucerne, and got to Einsiedeln or near it without seeing any 
 signs of what was going on except one group of thirty or forty 
 pilgrims trudging along manfully and womanfully with their 
 priest at their head, from some village on the other side of the 
 lake, i.e. beyond Brunnen, for a twenty miles' walk. At our half- 
 way stop they caught us up. and as they came up I was amused 
 at the way in which the waiters and other hotel authorities 
 rushed forward to hustle us out of the way, crying ' Place, 
 place, place,' in order that the pilgrims^might walk in with 
 due honours. About 12 o'clock we arrived at Einsiedeln. 
 The Convent is a very large quadrangle, of which one side, 
 comprising about TOO windows and the west facade of the 
 Convent church, overhangs a triangular Place very much as
 
 1871 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 309 
 
 our National Gallery overhangs Trafalgar Square. The Place 
 we guessed to be about the size of Trafalgar Square, but con- 
 siderably steeper. In the place of the terraces and Nelson 
 column is an imposing perron very spacious, with a broad, 
 inclined plane running down the hill from the west front of 
 the church and on each side two handsome quarter circles 
 of arcades. Between the Nelson column and King Charles's 
 statue is a stone canopy with fountain jets of water, being the 
 springs above mentioned, and lower down still was a 
 temporary wooden construction with an altar (a reposoir, as 
 they would call it in France) prepared for illumination. The 
 annexed rude plan and elevation will give you some idea of it. 
 
 The monastery is surrounded by hills, one of which may 
 be said to overhang it and the village to the right of my 
 picture. 
 
 The village, when we got to it, was crowded with pilgrims 
 estimated by the waiter at ten or twelve thousand 
 from all parts of (Catholic) Switzerland and further few 
 sightseers, but lots of booths, of which four-fifths were full of 
 rosaries, little images of the Madonna, books of devotion, and 
 so on the fifth being usually, as far as I could see, for the 
 sale of cotton pocket-handkerchiefs, mostly bright red. The 
 days of costume seem to have gone by, but a fair sprinkling 
 from the different cantons were to be seen men and women. 
 The objets de devotion were intended to be blessed after 
 Vespers, with the distinction that all might be blessed, but 
 only those which were of some solid material could have 
 Indulgences attached to them. Little fly-leaves were also 
 to be got cheap, one of which (bought by Sir James Paget, of 
 whose party we were) contained a very beautiful prayer, with 
 an intimation that any person who said it, or had it said to 
 him, or kept it about his person, would be preserved from all 
 accidents and (I think) sin, that poison would not injure him, 
 that he would be miraculously informed of the day of his 
 death, that in certain specified conjunctures the prayer would 
 act the part of an experienced surgeon, with other advantages 
 which I forget. Among the first things which met your eye 
 was a ring of circulating pilgrims round the fountain. Every 
 one desires to drink of the spring which our Saviour tasted,
 
 3 io LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 and as nobody knows which that was, everybody goes 
 the round. In the church you are faced by a massive shrine 
 containing the black image with lamps, &c., and before it a 
 crowd of people silent on their knees. The rest of the 
 church was filled (there was no service going on) with a 
 crowd moving quietly about with a kind of serious curiosity, 
 except that, when we first got in, there was a knot of some 
 ten or twelve women (I suppose neighbours) going the round 
 of the chapels and saying before each, aloud and together, 
 some stated form of prayer. It was a curious sight to see the 
 businesslike but serious way in which they knelt down to 
 utter their hum before one chapel, and then got up and moved 
 on to do the same thing at the next. Then at two o'clock 
 came Vespers an orchestral service, with a fine old choral 
 hymn tune sung by voices only in the shrine of the black 
 image among the lamps. The words were what is called 
 Salve Regina. It was curious to see the travelled look of 
 the people trudging or sitting about in or out of the church, 
 with their basket of (evidently) the day's provisions. One old 
 fellow struck me very much with his dusty and worn (not 
 over-fatigued) look, as he trudged down the church aisle 
 slowly with his alpenstock in his hand. He had evidently 
 had a good stiff mountain walk that morning. After Vespers 
 we went to the church again, and the first thing which struck 
 me was that the hum of groups ' doing ' the shrine had become 
 a positive chatter, which filled the church. Every chapel had 
 its one or two groups, all going through their appointed work 
 the louder because there were so many of them, without 
 regard (most properly) to anything but themselves. Then 
 there was a rush out to see a fresh arrival some 200 
 people arranged in two long single files, well apart so 
 as to take up a broad strip of road : first about 100 
 women, then 100 men, then some thirty or forty priests 
 moving up to the church, singing antiphonally some chant or 
 litany (Gregorian), and then, when they got into church, 
 uniting in one great volume of hymn. Then came a break 
 for dinner, in preparation for the great event of the day 
 the procession and illuminations. The course of events I 
 don't distinctly remember, except that either then or on
 
 1871 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 311 
 
 the arrival of the 250 pilgrims we heard a grand singing of 
 ' Sun of my Soul ' (not the words, but the tune) note for 
 note as we have it. I shall like it better hereafter, for I 
 always had a kind of modern association about it which is 
 now effectually disposed of. As it got dark the Place began 
 to light up sharp little lines of fire moved about it, which 
 on investigation turned out to be trays of illumination 
 lamps carried to and fro on men's heads. The windows of 
 the Convent (100) and of the hotels and houses, the arcades, 
 the front of the church, tne fountain (?) and the reposoir, 
 all began to light up, till the Place was all of a blaze, 
 and, what was very beautiful, a gigantic cross lighted itself 
 up on the side of the overhanging hill, so as to seem, when 
 the hill became invisible in darkness, like a cross in the sky. 
 Meantime the inside of the church began to be alive. Two 
 grand organs with choirs attached began to play, echoing 
 each other, one loud, one low, from the different ends of the 
 great church. The distance was great enough to give the 
 effect of distance. Then at last the candles collected about 
 the altar, and after more music and singing streamed down 
 the centre of the church some 200 or 300 men with candles 
 out at the centre door, and down the slope to the fountains 
 and reposoir, all singing antiphonally some grand old chant or 
 hymn first with some, say, twenty or thirty strong voices, 
 then with the whole mass of voices they could muster, plus an 
 accompaniment, most effective, of serpents and trombones. 
 At the end of the procession was the baldachino, and under 
 it the ' Prince-Abbot ' with the Sacrament in a splendid 
 monstrance. At each event which occurred i.e. as the 
 Sacrament was taken from the altar, as the procession started, 
 as the head of it cleared out from the church, as the Sacra- 
 ment cleared out, as the Abbot mounted the reposoir cannon 
 fired from the overhanging hill, as I call it, or bells rang- -or 
 both sometimes also the clock took the opportunity to strike. 
 And I can hardly describe the effect upon us of the whole 
 scene the two single files of candles winding down the 
 slope from the church to the reposoir, the alternate chanting, 
 the guns, the bells, the clock, the multitude of faces lighted 
 up by the blazing reposoir and, as the Sacrament passed,
 
 3 i2 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 the kneeling of the vast crowd : all far more beautiful, I think, 
 because it was at night (as, indeed, is naturally the case with 
 illuminations but an intelligent being will see what I mean). 
 In the crowd the remarkable things were, first, the general 
 quiet ; secondly, the downright way in which the country 
 women elbowed their way to the place they wanted. Three 
 of them rushed on Georgie and myself and our neighbours like 
 Homeric heroes rushing into battle, sweeping opposition aside 
 right and left with their elbows blindly, as a warrior would 
 with his two-handed sword. However, we yielded with 
 sufficient promptitude to escape a catastrophe. When the 
 abbot reached the reposoir, a number of singers were drafted 
 off to a distance, when a hymn or musical service was sung, 
 with the same effect of distant response ; then the multitude 
 was blessed, the cannons fired, the bells rung, the procession 
 mounted again to the church, and we went home, arriving at 
 our gite on the lake about half-past twelve or one o'clock in 
 the morning. There there is a good long story for you, and 
 so good-bye. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 F. ROGERS. 
 
 . To Right Hon. W. E. Gladstone. 
 
 / Hotel Bellevue, Lucerne : September 24, 1871. 
 
 f My dear Gladstone, You will, I am sure, do me the justice 
 to assume that I have only just received your letter of the 
 3 ist ult. I have just got it, and that, I may almost say, by 
 accident. I can hardly say how it surprised and gratified me ; 
 but I think I must answer it by explanations. I do not for a 
 moment suppose that you would offer me or any Cite else a 
 peerage, except with the full expectation that its duties would 
 be performed with entire independence. But neither can I 
 suppose would you do so without some definite idea of the 
 turn which that independence would probably take. And this 
 is one point on which I wish to speak as clearly as I can. 
 
 \ Partly perhaps from disposition, partly from the habits of a 
 Permanent Under Secretary, I am singularly averse from party 
 politics, and find myself almost equally unable to attach myself 
 
 i
 
 1871 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 313 
 
 to any existing division of political parties. On some points 
 I find myself radical, some would say revolutionary a thing I 
 detest On the other hand Tj^terly^dislil^ej^emocrary, abhor 
 demagogy, doubt whether any country can be Tor any long 
 time safely and honourably governed in which an aristocracy 
 more or less hereditary is not a leading element, and I appre- 
 hend evil for the country from the opposite tendencies of the 
 day. This rather cross-cuts existing divisions of parties and, 
 in default of party guidance, I should probably be guided by 
 personal or temporary considerations to an extent which most 
 men would denounce as impracticable and inconsistent. To 
 take an actual illustration : Two years ago I should, if en- 
 gaged in political life, have been an earnest supporter of yours 
 as to the Irish Church, while I should as vigorously have sup- 
 ported our Devonshire members, Lopes and Kekevvich, against 
 Lord Amberley. You would generally, I think, find me cor- 
 dially with you in all that part of your policy which goes to 
 benefit the poor or to purify the public service, military or civil. 
 But I might find myself taking part decidedly against you on 
 questions of yielding to what I should call the populace, or 
 when it appeared to me that constitutional changes were pre- 
 cipitated from any party necessity. So much for politics 
 which, however, I say rather to relieve my own mind than 
 because 1 expect you to attach much weight to it. 
 
 Next as to personal matters. I understand the offer of a 
 peerage to be made to me, not as a mere decoration or an easy 
 chair, but as an occasion for useful public work. It is on this 
 point of view that your offer and my acceptance would be 
 justified. Now I should have been much disappointed if you 
 had not, as time went on, found some means of making me (of 
 course gratuitously) useful to the public. It was part of my 
 scheme of life. But first, in point of strength and health the 
 public has had the best of me. For some months I have felt 
 that I could not do again what I have done, or anything like it. 
 I should fail, which would be an evil for the public ; or I should 
 break down, an evil for myself, which no man is bound to incur 
 for the sake of doing what can be sufficiently done by others. 
 And next, I could not afford to do anything which required 
 much expense. But for my pension I could not live in my
 
 3 i4 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 own country house and meet what I consider imperative local 
 claims, and with it I cannot add to that country life, which I 
 consider a duty and a necessity, a regular London residence 
 during the parliamentary session. What I can do in that 
 way I hardly yet know. It would certainly be intermittent, 
 and possibly very short of the expectations with which your 
 offer is made. 
 
 All this being the case, what I now want to do, and very 
 sincerely is to place you as far as possible in the position of not 
 having made the offer, and to ask you to consider with the 
 light this letter gives you whether you would make it afresh if 
 it had not been made already. If you would not, I should 
 then like to know whether you would wish me to consider the 
 whole matter as non avenu, or whether I shall consider myself 
 as having declined it on the ground of narrow income i.e. on 
 the ground, which if true in your judgment will be true in my 
 mouth, that my income will not allow me to perform the duties 
 of a peerage in the way in which they ought to be performed 
 in order to justify your recommendation of me to the Queen. 
 In either of these cases I shall retain the very great gratifica- 
 tion of having received the offer in fact If you adhere to 
 your offer you can treat this letter as a most grateful accep- 
 tance of it. 
 
 As you send a message to my wife, I will say that she is 
 delighted at the offer, and still more, if possible, at the 
 terms in which it is made. But she is such a conservative 
 (domestically I now mean, not politically) and so unadven- 
 turous that I am not sure she will be quite as much pleased 
 at its taking effect I cannot say how much I was pleased at 
 your appointment of Church. 
 
 Ever yours sincerely, 
 
 F. ROGERS. 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Milan : October 13, 1871. 
 
 My dear Taylor, If it had been possible to help it, I 
 should not have let you learn from the newspapers my wise 
 or unwise acceptance of a peerage. But the fact is that you 
 knew it some days before I did. Gladstone had written me
 
 1871 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 315 
 
 a very kind offer of it, and I had replied by explanations leav- 
 ing him at liberty to treat the offer as non avenu or to treat 
 my letter as an acceptance. And on the same day I learnt 
 here by a letter from him (a long time on its road) and from 
 the ' Times ' that he had taken my acceptance, and that the 
 Queen was pleased to approve me. 
 
 It is in many respects more than pleasant. As a recogni- 
 tion of my own services its only fault is that it is too much, and 
 that others may think it so. The work and semi-political 
 status are just what I should expect to like. But it will cut 
 rather more deeply than I could have wished into our intended 
 country life and into our income. To begin with, you will 
 have us back in town for a more or less long period in February. 
 
 Have you any views as to the use of a peer? Mine are 
 very vague, and I look to be enlightened by practice before I 
 form any scheme of conducting myself. I look forward with 
 some apprehension to the necessity of forming opinions that 
 will hold water on a lot of questions which I have kept at bay 
 while I could say to myself that I did my share of public duty 
 in working at the Colonies. I don't know whether others ever 
 feel the same, but I used to feel that the constant habit of 
 taking decisions under responsibility tried the determining 
 powers of the intellect, just as walking up hill fatigues a 
 certain set of sinews ; and my great rest was in refusing to form 
 conclusions out of office hours. And now I shall have to set 
 to work making up my mind de rebus omnibus, much to the dis- 
 satisfaction, I am afraid, of many friends and relations, who 
 will think me unaccountable when I develop myself, if I have 
 to do so. 
 
 We have spent a very pleasant month in Switzerland 
 (Lucerne), which I think has been very useful to some of 
 the family who had been a good deal shaken by the events of 
 the year. I met Lord Carnarvon there, and, lounging with 
 him and Lady Carnarvon to get his letters from the post office, 
 I thought it just worth while to ask if there were any Poste 
 Restantes for me, and got Gladstone's letter, which had been 
 waiting three weeks, and would be waiting there still, I sup- 
 pose, but for this chance (I had not expected Poste Restante 
 letters, and most of them so addressed had been sent to me at
 
 316 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 the hotel). It was fortunate, as it was a satisfaction (which I 
 could not resist) talking it over with him, but rather odd. 
 Since that we crossed the Alps, glanced at Turin a dry un- 
 interesting place to my mind, I have no doubt practical to the 
 highest degree. The people all of them go about as they 
 do in London, as if they were going somewhere and had some- 
 thing to do, quite unlike the refreshing enjoyativeness of French 
 and Italians (proper). Here, too (Milan), there is a good deal 
 of modern thrivingness. But it is carried off by a few magni- 
 ficent bequests of antiquity (Duomo and so on), and a cheerful 
 stateliness which Turin wants. Then we have had a few days 
 on Lago Maggiore, strolling in chestnut woods delightfully 
 warm and delightfully cool, with pleasant reminders of home 
 scenery in the way of ferns, mosses, rocks, and rivulets 
 sprinkled among the enchanting Italian scenery proper. Now 
 we are on the point of starting for Florence vid Bologna. If 
 you are good enough to send us a line it will find us till near 
 the end of the month at the Hotel de 1'Europe, Florence. Our 
 very best love to you. 
 
 Ever yours, 
 
 F. R. 
 
 Florence: October 19, 1871. 
 
 My dear Taylor, I confess the cacophony though, 
 strange to say, I had never remarked it ' Frederic Rogers 
 Baron Blachford ' contains an accumulation of bumping and 
 creaking and crashing and rattling difficult to parallel in four 
 words. The three first words, however, are unavoidable, and 
 as to the last, I am inclined to place considerations of family 
 and local feeling and semi-constitutional propriety rather 
 higher than you do, particularly as my decoration is prac- 
 tically a life one, and concerns not a series of generations for 
 whose ears, no doubt, consideration would be due but merely 
 a knot of friends and relations who are more accessible to 
 association than to euphony. Viewing the title as a reward 
 of exploits, perhaps I ought to propose myself as Baron of 
 Heligoland or Wagga-Wagga. But I am disposed to think 
 that if a man happens to have in his hands that which in old 
 times was the basis of a baronial title, i.e. a fragment of
 
 1871 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 317 
 
 manorial jurisdiction, there is a kind of constitutional pro- 
 priety in fixing upon that, and if so Blachford, Wisdome, and 
 Blachworthy l (which has been scouted) are my only alterna- 
 tives. Now let me thank you for your letter. I need not tell 
 you what pleasure your pleasure gives me. My wife tells me 
 that she has liked everybody's letters very much, and yours 
 better than anybody's that has been written. However, I am 
 writing for post, and must finish. 
 
 Ever yours, 
 
 F. ROGERS. 
 
 To the Rev. E. Rogers. 
 
 Florence : October 26, 1871. 
 
 Sight-seeing is sight-seeing at a place like this. We have 
 had a pleasant drive to St. Miniato, a pleasant walk (aided 
 by lifts) to Fiesole, a pleasant stroll in Boboli Gardens, all 
 with charming views of Florence and its contorni ; the quays 
 along the Arno are bright and beautiful at certain times 
 sunset and moonlight but for regular strolling, stony and 
 dusty, without the charm of Paris quays, and gardens, and 
 Boulevards. Purchasing is an attraction. I hope I have not 
 been horribly bitten, but I think that, though I have doubt- 
 less paid plentifully too much (Florence is very dear, and 
 Berne curiosities were very cheap), yet I am not out of con- 
 ceit with what I have got, broken about as some of them are. 
 The wealth of pictures is wonderful, but confusing. I am not 
 sure now that I agree with those who like simply to carry 
 away a clear recollection of the best things. I want to feel 
 a little acquainted with schools and individual painters, which 
 cannot be done without wading through a good deal. I think 
 at present my admiration of Ghirlandajo, Masaccio, and such- 
 like late pre-Raffaelite Florentines increases. But I never have 
 admired like other people, and am getting tired of Fra 
 Angelico. Looking at his works is like reading the same 
 story in different types. 
 
 Our American neighbours improve on acquaintance. The 
 lady is rather proud of her pure English blood and descent 
 
 1 Blachworthy was the old name of Blachford ; Wisdome was another manor 
 on the property.
 
 3 i8 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 from Royalists, who, however, seem to have adapted them- 
 selves to the new state of things, as her uncle married the 
 daughter of the patriarch Adams, and went with him to 
 England in his suite as Ambassador. He was a Colonel, and 
 one day (as the parental relation was kept up in those days) my 
 friend's grandmother, who seems to have been a Tartar, 
 thought it her duty to take him to task, opening with ' Child, 
 I am surprised,' &c. The Colonel meekly inquired, ' Madam, 
 when will you cease to call me child ? ' To which she replied, 
 ' When you cease to be my son. Leave the room.' On which 
 he dutifully retired, and penned an apology promising not to 
 object again. I think my friend would rather like to repeat 
 the process. 
 
 To the Hon. Mrs. Legge. 
 
 Assisi : October 1871. 
 
 Our next perch (after Florence) was Perugia, which was 
 thoroughly charming. It occupies the top of something half 
 mountain, half ridge, and spreads itself about up and down> 
 and sideways, and crossways, in such a way that you are 
 always passing under arches, with houses on the top of them, 
 and coming unexpectedly on beautiful views of the plains of 
 Umbria and the Apennines, through holes and under arches, 
 and down flights of steps, and ofif terraces. Then there are 
 inside noble buildings in the Piazza, and hosts of Peruginos, 
 capi cC opera. The days were perfect, and we had panoramas 
 from the terraces of magnificent sunset, of early mists, and of 
 clear forenoon. The old city walls run about in every possible 
 direction and at every possible angle, with great Etruscan 
 vases, Roman superstructure, and mediaeval towers. It came 
 upon me with all the pleasure of novelty. Indeed a thing 
 which you have only seen for a few hours thirty years (pretty 
 exactly) ago may well do so. But still Perugia was a case 
 of ' vide Murray.' To-day has been better. In the first place, 
 this place is charming, the picturesqueness of Perugia without 
 its splendid architecture, but with an element of wildness quite 
 its own. 
 
 Every house and lane and corner is a study ; there is the 
 same profusion of outlook, and (what we have not seen yet)
 
 1871 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 319 
 
 the same profusion of art, only of a still earlier age. But 
 there is also the connexion of St. Francis, whose history I 
 have just been reading, and this it is which we have come 
 across to-day. He is one of those men whose conduct has a 
 kind of mad brilliancy about it, but a madness founded at 
 bottom on the most noble principles and the most attractive 
 character, and producing such results (for a time at least) in 
 the reformation of the world that if a tree is to be judged by 
 its fruits you can hardly help believing him inspired. His 
 celebrity was so rapid that before his death everything con- 
 nected with him had become, so to say, a relic, and so there 
 is no possibility of doubting the genuineness of what you see. 
 The first sight which meets you is in the plain under Assisi 
 a handsome cinquecento church, dome, transepts, and so on. 
 When you enter it you see in all its rudeness a coarse stone 
 construction, the walls of an old substantial hovel, inside 
 which again is a rich altar with lamps burning, &c., and (when 
 we saw it, on a fair-day) a stream of peasants entering, 
 kneeling, and passing. This is the first small construction 
 made, in fact, by his own hands in which St. Francis and his 
 first two or three followers dwelt together. Then in the 
 afternoon we rode off to his retreat in the mountains. The 
 ride was charming, along the side of the mountains with the 
 great plain at our feet, encircled by the Apennines, Assisi, 
 with its walls, towns, citadel, and the rest on a spur behind us, 
 and Perugia and other towns and villages on slopes or hills in 
 the distance. Then we turned into a wild combe, very deso- 
 late except for one patch of some fifty or a hundred acres of 
 wood, the 'bosco' of St. Francis, and almost at the head of 
 the combe a group of rude buildings. The views through 
 and across the wood (of oak and ilex) lovely. 
 
 The buildings were shown by an old Franciscan, who was 
 evidently so taken by what he saw, and what I suspect our 
 conductor had told him of our interest in the matter, that he 
 unburthened himself very much of his legends. We had not 
 the heart to show incredulity, and felt a little like traitors while 
 he went on. It was a strange place, with doors, and passages, 
 and descents through which one almost had to creep, with 
 little grottos, of which we saw one which formed the oratories
 
 3 2o LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 of the first companions, and St. Francis' bed (of the authen- 
 ticity of which I should think there was no doubt) a bit of 
 hollowed rock, with a log where his head lay. Our conductor 
 was very anxious we should walk on the bed, and lay a little 
 card on the pillow (log) to take it away blessed, for which it 
 is proper to take off your shoes. This I duly did, and G. was 
 prepared to do the same ; but she was excused, ' perche non e 
 per disprezzo ' and she kept them on. Then came the stories. 
 First there was a miraculous painting of our Saviour on the 
 cross over the little altar. It had done many things, one of 
 which was this. One of the brethren had come in after his 
 day's work, hot and tired, and, resorting to the chapel to pray 
 before this picture, had gone to sleep. He was awakened by 
 a slight slap on the face 'non per far male,' and looking 
 about him saw the arms of our Saviour extended so as to 
 show that He had done it. Then the picture said : ' Figliuolo 
 mio, questo e luogo per pregare, non per dormire ; se volete 
 dormire, andate in dormitorio.' Then there was an ilex (of 
 which I have a sprig), on which the birds collected round 
 St. Francis chattering when he was at prayer. On which he 
 told them to be quiet, and hear him preach. And they were 
 silent, and he preached to them, not about sin, 'perche 
 gli animali non hanno peccato.' But he said : ' There is a great 
 God who made me, and you, and the sun and all things else. 
 You should praise Him, and now you may praise Him with 
 me.' And he then began singing and the birds all began 
 singing with him. Then there was a stream at the bottom 
 of the combe which disturbed him at his prayer, and he 
 prayed that it might cease, and it ceased from that time, 
 however violent the rain might be, except when some great 
 ' gastigo,' war, or famine, or pestilence was imminent. In 1 869 
 water ran, and an Austrian prelate, ' uomo santissimo/ was 
 there to see it and said ' Ci sara molto sangue,' and ' molto 
 sangue ' there has been (in the Prusso-French War). This 
 year the water has run, and ' e da vedere ' what calamity will 
 happen. 
 
 Then on the edge of the precipice there is a flat flag- 
 stone, with a hole through which you look to the bottom 
 of the ravine as into a well. This is a hole through which
 
 1871 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 321 
 
 St. Francis cast the devil when he came to tempt him. Then 
 there were other stories too long to tell about the devil, and 
 intercession, and the gift of prophecy. But the strange thing 
 was that the monk stood on this spot where things really as won- 
 derful as miracles did go on, and where the stones remained as 
 the first inhabitants had left them, telling us his stories one after 
 the other with all the attitudes and gesticulations which you 
 see in pictures, and all the conviction of the middle ages. 
 Beside him was the wild-looking conductor (of the omnibus) 
 sucking it all in ; but, as he knew it all by heart already, 
 every now and then throwing in a correction or amplification 
 that the monk had forgotten, like a child who corrects you 
 in telling him a story that he knows. 1 don't think I was ever 
 so taken out of the nineteenth century before. Finally our 
 guide told us (what was natural) that we should leave some- 
 thing for a mass to be said for the ' defunti ' in whom we were 
 interested. We gave something of course, but without the con- 
 dition ; but that would not satisfy our friend, who insisted 
 before we left that the /rate was to say a mass 'per 1' inten- 
 zione del Signore ' that is to say, in favour of any object that 
 I may choose to fix on. We had already told him that we were 
 not Catholics in his sense of the word, and I did not think it 
 necessary to trouble his mind or disturb thefrate by any further 
 protests. I am afraid he thought me unduly careless about the 
 ' intermediate state ' of my ' antenati ' (predecessors), for whose 
 benefit he desired us to exert ourselves, the altar being one 
 at which any amount of plenary indulgences are obtainable. 
 To-morrow we see the regular Assisi sights, and get to Rome, 
 where I hope we shall find letters. 
 
 Love to all, 
 
 Ever yours, 
 
 F. R. 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 Hotel de FAngleterre, Rome : November 3, 1871. 
 
 Our second day at Assisi was quite as good as the first. 
 The point was the convent and convent cbiurcfP'oI' St. 
 Francis. There were magnificent Giottos, Cimabues, &c., 
 some of which we saw well and carefully, others not at all. 
 
 Y
 
 322 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 But the point was the general scene. It was a great day, All 
 Saints' day, when at all the great altars there was a great 
 musical service great in respect to the place, but, as the poor 
 frate lamentably told us, very slight in comparison with the 
 grand doings before the suppression of monasteries in the 
 palmy days of the convent. However, it was quite grand 
 enough ; more grandeur would have been in the way. The 
 church consists of a crypt interesting as it contains St. 
 Francis' remains, and splendid in point of brass work, 
 marble, &c., and striking because seen only by candle light 
 but it was just what you might see anywhere in Rome, or 
 Milan, or Paris. Above that was the church, a dark labyrinth 
 of columns and altars, and aisles, and flights of steps, and 
 impasses, half lighted by fine painted windows and absolutely 
 covered by the richest old frescoes, low and spacious in 
 comparison with its height, and with a constant movement 
 (not amounting to a crowd) of Italian peasants, men and 
 women, come to be there on the great day, and some kneeling, 
 some simply wandering about. One of Cattermole's pictures 
 or I think Roberts, of some of the Eastern shrines 
 would give you the best notion of the general effect. This 
 church serves as the foundation for an upper church, built 
 upon it as one storey of a house is on another. This is a 
 simple cruciform one-aisled church covered with painting, 
 not entered except once or twice a year for purposes of 
 worship, and in which we could just study Giotto and Cimabue 
 at our leisure. When we went down we got entangled, as it 
 were, in the high mass which was celebrating at the high 
 altar or rather shrine, for it is not, like other high altars, a 
 central point commanding the whole of the church, but in a 
 kind of corner, with its back to the labyrinth of shafts and 
 chapels. When we had listened for some time, a stream of 
 bright Italian dresses swept suddenly along and threw them- 
 selves on their knees between us and the altar. You can 
 scarcely imagine the beauty of the pictorial and scenic effect 
 of this natural movement of people so dressed in such a scene 
 under the double light of lamps and painted windows. It 
 was as if Ravenna had come to life again. 
 
 Our guide was a Papalino not a bad fellow, but pretty well
 
 1871 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 323 
 
 crammed by the priests. His view was that Victor Emmanuel 
 was King of Sardinia and might goto Sardinia. But King of 
 Italy he was not till he was crowned ; and of course, in the 
 present state of things, crowned he could not be till the Pope 
 chose. King elect or King designate he might be, but not 
 King. One of our cabmen at Rome was in the same line. His 
 view had the merit of simplicity. Bread was 15 centimes 
 a pound under the Pope. It is 25 centimes under Victor 
 Emmanuel. Therefore he was for the Pope and not for 
 Victor Emmanuel. His view of the position of affairs was 
 that in Rome at least there were plenty of Papists and 
 plenty of Mazzinians, but a very small proportion of Victor 
 Emmariuclites ; and he promised that in the following summer, 
 or rather in March or April, we should have a blow up not 
 yet, but presently. Severne (the consul) did not talk very 
 cheerfully about the state of things. His view was that the 
 Italians (as has been always the case) could not understand 
 such a thing as equal rights. Their view was, what was the 
 good of being uppermost if you were not to plunder, crush, 
 and exterminate your opponents ? So the Liberals are disposed 
 to persecute the Papists, and have tried it. On the first 
 occasion the troops put them down, but fresh occasions will 
 arise. Unless the Pope comes to terms (which he will not), the 
 Liberals in Severne's opinion will make what the Italians call a 
 ' strada pulita ' or, as we should say, ' clean sweep ' of Pope, 
 cardinals, Vatican, monks, Leonine city, and everything 
 else : and if Victor Emmanuel tries to stop it by the soldiery 
 the soldiery will not act. These are difficulties not greater 
 than a great man could tackle. But then the Italians do 
 not seem to have a great man, or anything like one, among 
 them. 
 
 Tuesday we move to Naples (Hotel de la Bretagne), where 
 I hear Vesuvius is in eruption. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 F. R. 
 
 Y 2
 
 324 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 Naples : November 14, 1871. 
 
 My dear Kate, The weather has been so bad that I think 
 it not impossible that unless it mends we may turn tail and 
 run back to Rome, leaving Baie and Amalfi undone. How- 
 ever, we have had one beautiful day at Pompeii, and beautiful 
 patches of weather, including a most magnificent sunset seen 
 from the Strada Victor Emmanuel, a kind of terraced road 
 running behind the city along the side of the hill. This 
 morning we have been greatly amused at watching the fisher- 
 men drawing the nets. The sea was swarming with boats, 
 and at intervals along the shore under the Chiaja were the 
 seines being hauled in. The way is this : several hundred 
 yards out to sea is the net buoyed so that you can see it 
 with a boat to look after it ; at each end of the seine is 
 a rope carried to the shore, and at the end of the rope some 
 thirteen or fifteen men. One is stationary at the end of each 
 rope, coiling it as it comes in ; the rest are pulling away at the 
 rope in a line ; then, each has hold of the rope not with his 
 hands, but with a little instrument attached to a broad belt 
 diagonally round his body, a little rope and peg, so that if he 
 keeps his own rope and peg gripping the net rope, he pulls 
 by his belt with the whole weight of his body. As the man at 
 the head of the line gets up to the coil he looses his peg, 
 lets go the rope, and walks down to take hold at the tail of 
 the line, so that there is a continual circulation of men pulling 
 up to the head of the line and then leaving go and walking 
 back to take their place at the tail. Their clothes are so 
 tucked up that the whole leg, including the thigh, is naked ; 
 on their heads they have caps of various sorts, principally the 
 old Phrygian, and their torsos are enveloped in every variety 
 of rags. Their legs are of a fine Venetian brown and shaped 
 like so many Greek statues, and there are about a lot of imps, 
 active and impudent, begging, chattering, laughing, &c. 
 Some groups are mending the nets as they come in, some 
 lighting the fires to cook, as far as I could see, the small fish 
 they could pick up. Five, during part of the time, were occu- 
 pied in looking in the sand for a penny which I had impru-
 
 1871 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 325 
 
 dently thrown to one of them, and being called away to take 
 their share of the work rushed back again to prosecute their 
 search the moment the net was landed. From this you may 
 see that the rate of profit was not high ; nor could it be, for 
 as far as I could see the whole produce of this great exertion 
 of some thirty men was some two or three hundred small 
 fishes rather smaller than sprats. Meantime the urchins who 
 had got hold of a few of these wretched little animals were 
 shaking them in our faces and asking for money, indicating 
 that for the smallest consideration they would do something 
 the nature of which for a long time we could not make out, 
 but which at length appeared to be the eating those creatures 
 raw, or perhaps alive. Some of the creatures so to be eaten were 
 small crabs. When I (for G., luckily for herself, was not by) 
 was evidently unable to make out what was meant, a bystander 
 pinched off the head of the wriggling little fish with his fingers, 
 and then the holder, after exhibiting its convulsive movements, 
 ate it at two bites very nasty. Nastiness apart, the place 
 was picturesque beyond measure, and Vesuvius (which formed 
 the background) took occasion to throw out great jets of black 
 smoke, one every three or four minutes, for the first time 
 since we have been here. It was rather solemn ; a black 
 column rose slowly and perpendicularly from the peak, and 
 then fell asunder, as it were, into the shape of a tall elm tree. 
 Then it ceased to issue ; the wind caught it and blew it into a 
 thin cloud, in which shape it floated off to the north and, while 
 it was still a floating patch of black, another discharge took 
 place. Meanwhile as far as we could make out there was a 
 constant gush of silvery smoke or vapour coming out to the 
 south of the black smoke above the spot which 1 have marked 
 O. But this may have been a mere cloud. At present 
 everything is hidden behind thick rain. The fantastic pic- 
 turesqueness and incongruity of everything in this place 
 strikes one. In the Toledo you jostle dirty ragged little 
 vagabonds that nowhere appear in the decent parts of every 
 other Christian city ; you meet first a cart driven by a Capu- 
 chin (begging of course), then a cab loaded with people in 
 rags, pleasuring ; then you turn aside up something between 
 a lane and a flight of steps, get entangled in a drove of goats,
 
 326 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 arc nearly run over by donkeys coming down ; then you find 
 a lot of cabs on the landing-place. Returning to Toledo (the 
 Regent Street) you fall upon a hay stack, and by diligent 
 scrutiny discover the head and tail of a horse in the middle of 
 it, which horse has been carrying it down the hill (a sharp 
 incline paved with smooth flagstones), and of course has come 
 as nearly over head and heels as the nature of his load admits. 
 How the creatures keep their legs at all I cannot understand, 
 but they do so. The place to-day after a slight drizzle was 
 like an inclined plane of ice, and in going up and down the 
 whole street I do not think we saw more than nine or ten 
 tumbles. Our own cab horse did not tumble more than once r 
 and picked himself up in a moment. It is wonderful the pace 
 they go, even when paid by the hour. 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 Rome : November 1871. 
 
 We got here on Saturday evening. William Palmer and 
 Sir A. Paget are both away, but I hope much from the Ser- 
 monetas (to whom the Stanleys introduced us). I first asked 
 the directeur \\ere whether he knew their address. His answer 
 was : ' Palazzo Gaetani ' but I wish I could do justice to the 
 tone and expression of face. The tone was what I think they 
 call a ' slide ' on the violin running to a very high note, ex- 
 pressive of the extremest of surprise and amusement, and 
 being an Italian translation of what an Englishman would say 
 in Windsor if you asked him whether he knew Queen Victoria's 
 address : ' Why the Castle, to be sure ; where the devil do you 
 suppose it would be ? ' However, I still had to find out where 
 the Palazzo Gaetani was (he is the head of the family, and he 
 and his son, the Principe Teano, have married English women), 
 which we did, and left our cards and letter about 2 P.M. 
 Before we sat down to dinner we got their cards in return, and 
 the next day, yesterday, we found a card (which it was ex- 
 plained was left by the Duchess in person) with ' Sta in casa 
 ogni sera dopo le otto' I don't know how often we can go, but 
 I imagine pretty constantly. We thought, however, that an 
 instant appearance would be rather too much of a good thing, 
 and so shall go this evening.
 
 1871 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 327 
 
 The company here is a decided improvement on what it 
 was, the torrent of Americans seeming to have passed, and we 
 have some intelligent people (as at Naples) coming home from 
 India ; also a queer pair now gone that 1 should like to make 
 out. The husband might have been a correspondent (in France, 
 where they had lived a great deal) of some north country 
 house of business. I was amused at one or two of his French 
 stories about sugar (at cafes). He said he was having some coffee 
 at the Rotunda in the Palais Royal (just in front of the Trois 
 Freres Provencaux) with a French friend when somebody who 
 had also had his coffee left without taking away his remnant 
 of sugar. On this the French friend quietly put out his hand 
 and pocketed the derelict sugar. ' You know I did not know 
 where to look I was ready to jump into my own pocket.' 
 ' What are you doing there ? ' says I. ' Mais c'est paye,' says 
 he. ' But you didn't pay for it,' says I. ' Mais qu'est que ga 
 fait ? ' says he. On another occasion one of his friends, habitue 
 at a certain cafe, left his sugar similarly behind him, and the 
 next day asked for it in addition to his usual allowance the 
 claim was allowed, and the sugar duly given him. Judging 
 from recollections of Chasseloup Laubat, I suppose it is their 
 luncheon. It is a great comfort to be settled quietly for some 
 time, and after the first brush I shall try to get a little 
 regularity, having as a habit an hour or two of reading, 
 writing, and such like in the morning. It is a place, I am 
 inclined to think, where you are not easy till you have more 
 or less cursorily swept over the ground, and are at liberty 
 to please yourself in idling with or without friends or 
 objects, without considering whether there is or is not some- 
 thing you ought to be doing. 
 
 To-day my little indisposition will prevent me from seeing 
 some functions of the day (' Saint Cecilia ') which, however, 
 may come to nothing, as the ecclesiastical authorities are in 
 a state of sulk and stop everything they can. Our Neapolitan 
 marquis was of opinion that strangers would not go to Rome 
 this year ; his view was that the funzioni being stopped, ' II n'y 
 a que les ruines, qui sont peu de chose,' and this was said so 
 naturally that it was evident he believed in it.
 
 328 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 To the Hon. Mrs. Legge. 
 
 Rome : November 30, 1871. 
 
 In spite of G.'s sprained ankle, we are likely to plunge 
 into dissipation. We have been to see the illuminations (at 
 least I did), we are to dine with the Sermonetas on Monday, 
 and with certain Walpoles on Tuesday. He is a blind man, a 
 brother of Lord Orford's, who is active in charities and one 
 of a body of people of all nations who called on the Pope to 
 express sympathy with him on the great illumination day, 
 the opening by the king of the first Roman Parliament. I 
 went to the Piazza. Colonna to see the king pass. He was 
 well received that is to say, there was one of those shouts 
 which seem to unite in one voice, and of which it is difficult 
 to judge the amount. But what struck me was the more 
 than grave look of the people. People say it is the way of 
 the Romans to be grave. But I think it must be something 
 more. I was so much struck by it that I stopped at a corner 
 where the stream was passing after the sight to see whether 
 I could see a cheerful face : and staying for some little time 
 it was literally true that I could not see one, except two, or 
 at most three, chattering women not a single male ; and they 
 had an air, not only grave, but somewhat anxious or unsatis- 
 fied, like people coming back from a lottery in which they 
 have not won. The only excitement I saw was a lot ot 
 people pointing out to one another something in the sky or 
 on the top of Antonine's Column, I could not see which. At 
 '-last it appeared that the morning star was just visible up 
 there, and the people settled that it was the ' Stella d' Italia ' 
 appearing to them on Italian Unity, which they were the more 
 pleased at because the Pope's Council, you may remember, 
 was saluted by thunder, lightning, and rain of a portentous 
 kind. The impression was that the whole thing went off 
 well. I am hardly surprised to see how the intelligent people 
 here distinguish between Napoleon and the French as their 
 creditors for the freedom of Italy. 
 
 A particularly pleasing and intelligent Italian officer who 
 sat next me at table d'hote (the pleasantest neighbour I had) 
 for one day said that the history of the treaty of Villa Franca
 
 1871 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 329 
 
 Avas that the French army would not go on. They 
 thought they had made enough sacrifices for Italy. Our 
 first evening at the Sermonetas' 2 was rather a failure ; they 
 proclaimed themselves accessible ' dopo le otto,' so we went 
 at half-past eight and found ourselves a good quarter of an 
 hour too soon. The Duchess, who is our stand .by, had gone 
 off" (evidently) to take an after-dinner nap, and had to be 
 hunted up ; the Duke is blind, and so was unhandy at helping 
 us through ; the servant could not pronounce nor the company 
 understand our names, and we interrupted in the middle some 
 quiet family after-dinner music. However, the Duchess got on 
 very well (she is so kind and cordial that it is impossible it 
 should be otherwise) with both of us, and she and I talked as 
 old acquaintances and settled that we must have known each 
 other in 1840-1. The Duke is very amiable and intelligent, 
 but I find great difficulty in understanding his English and 
 I doubt his understanding mine, and this is a difficulty to 
 which blindness adds much. Consequently there was a want 
 of suite in our conversation which prevented much progress. 
 Last Tuesday I went again (leaving G. on the sofa) and got 
 on more easily. I was not too soon, the room was not full 
 but pleasantly filled with deputies and such like, and I was 
 introduced to the Walpoles and to an avocato Vera, appa- 
 rarently an habitue, who felt it his duty to take some charge of 
 the stranger and talked French. I wish it were fairly the 
 practice to do so ; as a matter of course, one does not 
 know what to be at when one has a miserable choice between 
 English, French, and Italian. As to lionising, we are obliged 
 by G.'s ankle to go tout doucement, which to me personally is 
 
 The Duke of Sennoneta, the father of him, and added to his agreeable 
 
 of the present Duke, was the ' Don qualities he had a wonderful and 
 
 Michelangelo Gaetani ' (then Prince accurate knowledge of his own country 
 
 of Teano) with whom Sir Walter Scott during the darker days .... these 
 
 made acquaintance in 1832. In Sir historical qualities, added to the amenity 
 
 W. Cell's 'Memoranda of Scott's of his manners, rendered him naturally 
 
 Visit to Rome' he is described as ' a a favourite with Sir Walter.' The 
 
 person of the most amiable disposition, Duchess (his second wife) was a Miss 
 
 gentlemanly manners, and remarkable Knight, and was in Rome with her 
 
 talents. Sir Walter, to whom he had mother when Lord Blachford was there 
 
 paid every attention during his stay at in 1840. 
 Rome, had conceived a high opinion
 
 330 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 rather a relief. To-day we shall go to hear Vespers at St. 
 Peter's (having bought a camp stool), and to-morrow the 
 Vatican sculptures. I am making a few purchases in a small 
 way, and am rather tempted by lace ; there is a good deal of 
 the old guipure and such like about, and it seems to me 
 cheap. We bought two metres yesterday (about two yards 
 eight inches, I believe) for thirty francs ; that, however, was 
 rather specially cheap. It is of a massive pattern, looking 
 almost liked a pierced ribbon. There is also a good deal of 
 what I think they call Spanish point, and a finer and broader 
 sort of guipure at a higher price, some thirty or forty francs a 
 yard, very handsome. All which I mention in case you would 
 like us to pick up some for you if we have a chance. Anti- 
 quities are certainly dear. Everything at Florence seemed to 
 be 200 francs ; here everything worth looking at is 800 francs. 
 However, I have got a very pretty little terra-cotta female 
 figure, old Magna Graecia work and I should say unmistak- 
 ably Greek in its character, for sixty francs (some people 
 would call it dear at six) ; and I think a charming bit of old 
 Roman mozaic, two goldfinches flying at each other within a 
 wreath the size of a reasonable paper weight, for fifty francs ; 
 and meditate a little more terra cotta if I can, which has 
 always been in my line. In architecture I am getting very 
 much attracted by the old Imperial style of church : lines of 
 columns with flat entablature, a flat, highly ornamental 
 ceiling, smooth semi-spherical apses, and lots of mosaic the 
 old basilica in fact and proportionately tired of the St. Paul's 
 and St. Peter's style, of which, however, one must of course 
 acknowledge the imposingness. 
 
 A lot of people of all nations got up a deputation of 
 sympathy to the Pope on the day of the opening of the 
 Italian Parliament, and they say the poor old gentleman 
 was so overcome that he could hardly thank them. Some- 
 body told us that he was also very much overcome at a 
 failure to perform a miracle. It seems authenticated that a 
 Princess Odeschalchi being dangerously ill from an impossi- 
 bility of swallowing, the Pope sent her something with a 
 command to swallow it, which (under the excitement) she 
 did, and got at once well. It is said that the other day he
 
 1871 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 331 
 
 bade a lame man walk. The man, under the excitement 
 again, sprang up, but at once sank back again ; the Pope 
 repeated hi.s command twice but with no further effect, and 
 had to drive on, throwing himself back in his carriage in an 
 access of disappointment. If true, it must be a strange 
 excited state of mind ; however, I tell it ' under reserve.' 
 
 To Right Hon. W. E. Gladstone. 
 
 Hotel d'Angleterre, Rome : December 7, 1871. 
 
 My dear Gladstone, An ignorant man must always run 
 the risk of being fussy or of being wrong. I am perfectly 
 ignorant of the mode or modes in which I can make myself 
 quietly useful to you and the public in the new capacity 
 which you have been pleased to impose upon me, and 
 equally so as to the formalities or proprieties which attend 
 the taking my place in the House of Lords ; so I will just 
 report what as at present advised I propose to myself if I do 
 not hear from you that there is any reason to the contrary. 
 (I shall be here, i.e. at this address, till Christmas.) 
 
 I hope to be in London in the first fortnight in January. 
 Probably neither you nor Lord Granville will be in town, but 
 I shall call on the Chancellor to get renseignements and 
 instructions. I suppose the Court will ensure his being forth- 
 coming. I shall not make any plans which will prevent my 
 being guided mainly by what I hear from him, or from you, 
 or Lord Granville if either of you are accessible. In the 
 absence of any reason to the contrary, I should (for the sake 
 of a country summer) probably make a settled stay in town 
 during the earlier part of the session and run backwards and 
 forwards during the latter part. But if, as I am told, the 
 latter part is really the working time, it would be better, I 
 presume, to reverse the order. Of course I should place 
 myself among your supporters, and should be glad to make 
 myself useful, not only to the public, but to you as a Govern- 
 ment, making the most of agreement and the least of any 
 difference. Under the latter head I may say that Coleridge's 
 University Bill is the matter which (unexamined) I least 
 like the look of.
 
 332 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 I write this by way of keeping- myself en rapport with 
 you, without troubling you to answer me. I should perhaps 
 hardly have troubled you to read it, but that I am not 
 absolutely sure whether a note which I wrote to Lord Gran- 
 ville reached him or not. 
 
 Yours most sincerely, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 To Miss S. Rogers. 
 
 Rome : December 12, 1871. 
 
 My dear Sophy, I have been greatly idle in writing to 
 the family, partly because I have had some other letters to 
 write, partly on general grounds. I think I left you before our 
 Sermoneta dinner. They were very friendly and fixed a day for 
 our dining with them a family party, with the usual evening 
 gathering after it. We of course had the Duke and Duchess 
 between us, and each got on very pleasantly with our neigh- 
 bours. She is very cordial and amiable, and plainly so much 
 enjoys her good English talk that it is always pleasant to be 
 with her. I was introduced then and before to a succes- 
 sion of deputies ; a Sicilian (rather heavy in his French, and 
 I did not encourage Italian), two Milanese, both very 
 nice fellows, who talked mightily about irrigation and 
 Italian farming which, though I did not carry away much, 
 was pleasant to hear. . . . But the feature of the evening 
 was a Madame Peruzzi. Signer Peruzzi I take to be about 
 the ablest homme <?ttat that they have. He was ' Sindaco ' 
 of Florence (Lord Mayor plus Governor, I take it), and so 
 administered the city that the Tuscans would be ready, to 
 make him (says her Grace) ' Ubaldino ' the first Grand Duke 
 of Tuscany if he would hold up his little finger. He is a 
 very good speaker, and his wife evidently one of those 
 people who always have been popular. 
 
 We were all sitting in a state of propriety round the tea 
 table, when down she plumped in the middle of us, and with- 
 out a moment's delay began talking aloud to everybody at 
 once, as if she had said to herself: ' Oh, all this dignity will 
 never do, I must set all this right ' and in five minutes we 
 were in the middle of a battle royal about Italian pronuncia-
 
 1871 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 333 
 
 tion. The Duke of Sermoneta's she was kind enough to 
 patronise, he had ' really no Roman accent at all ' on which 
 some of the Romans remarked, ' so much the worse for him,' 
 for ' lingua Toscana in bocca Romana ' but that she would 
 not hear of: ' lingua Toscana in bocca Toscana ' was the true 
 thing. Nobody else pronounced words as they were written 
 as for the Romans, they doubled all their consonants. ' So,' 
 it was replied, 'do you in academia, which you pronounce 
 accademia! ' Well,' she said, ' we spell it with two c's ' an inven- 
 tion, I believe, made on the spot. I was a good deal struck by 
 the fineness of their ears for enunciation ; nobody seemed 
 capable of confusing between academia and accadfrnia as 
 pronounced by them, but my ear with difficulty detected the 
 difference. Of course it is easy to make a difference by 
 imagination and emphasis, but this was what they did not do. 
 Since that time we have been there in the evening, and made, 
 I will not say more acquaintances, but talked to more Italians. 
 I got rather into a corner, but G. had a very pleasant evening 
 in the thick of it with the Sermonetas and a pleasant Italian 
 ex-Premier, Minghetti, through some of whom, by the way, 
 we have got a general order of admittance to the diplomatic 
 tribune in the Chamber of Deputies. 
 
 After the last evening G. was surprised by a message from 
 below stairs from the ' Principessa di Caserta ' 3 to know 
 whether she received. I was out, but came up to the hotel 
 staircase just in time to see the Duchess of Sermoneta 
 depositing herself on a bit of web (don't you call it?) preparatory 
 to being carried upstairs to our troisieme by her grand foot- 
 men, and a facchino (she is a confirmed invalid), and a very 
 cosy little talk we had over our wood fire. One got on so 
 well asking her all sorts of questions about Italian politics 
 and so on ; it was evidently (I thought) such a pleasure to 
 her to go on telling us. 
 
 Yesterday we made the first experiment of our ticket for 
 the diplomatic tribune. Very comfortable, and we (coming 
 an hour too soon) had the very best places. It is a great 
 
 3 Caserta was a possession of the Roman people still spoke of the 
 Dukes of Sermoneta till it was sold Sermonetas as Casertas. 
 to one of the Kings of Naples. The
 
 334 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 place, like a theatre ; the deputies are in the pit, in concentric 
 circles round the centre, where the President is, each having 
 his place numbered, with his little desk and inkstand and 
 paper (like the French). Above in the ' dress circle ' are the 
 public ; above them a great semi-dome, with a circular skylight 
 in the centre. G. says that our House of Commons looks 
 much more businesslike I admit it looks more like a field 
 of battle and from being much smaller (the gallery as well 
 as the floor being appropriated to members) I think it does 
 not show emptiness so dismally as this must. At present the 
 attendance seems rather large at least there seemed many 
 more members present than would be in the House of 
 Commons on so trifling an occasion as yesterday was. But 
 the sittings are short. The debate, or rather the questions 
 and answers, seemed prosy but so to me is the House of 
 Commons in a general way and here we did not. understand 
 more than some thirty or forty words an hour. 
 
 Ever yours, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 To the Rev. E. Rogers. 
 
 Rome : December 31, 1871. 
 
 My dear Edward, I think we owe you more of a letter 
 than any one else. We have of course been doing the usual 
 things. Yesterday we went to Frascati ; but the day clouded, 
 and the distant mountains arid sea were in fog. We got, 
 however, some beautiful sights particularly a wonderfully 
 beautiful sunset effect on the plain (purples and reds) without 
 any adequate sun to account for it. I am greatly struck by the 
 Italian villas, both the grounds, which are charming beyond 
 expression and perfectly enjoyable for their purpose, and 
 the marble in the interiors which, however, are almost 
 oppressively magnificent. In order to rival them at Blachford, 
 I have invested some 5/. in scraps of marble, which (unless 
 the working them up is terribly costly) I think may be made 
 to look pretty. Somewhere about 250 bits or so ; all sorts of 
 fragmentary shapes ; but, if put into squares, varying, I 
 suppose, from 2 to 12 inches square may come in well 
 
 I met at dinner on Tuesday a Doctor Pantaleone, now
 
 1871 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 335 
 
 (and I think formerly) chief of the great hospital here the 
 Santo Spirito and politician of, I suppose, the Cavour ideas 
 and something more. He talked very interestingly. He 
 was, while a leading physician here, employed by Cavour to 
 negotiate something or other quietly with the Pope ; but 
 his negotiations were abruptly brought to a conclusion by an 
 order transmitted to the then Secretary for the Police, a 
 Monsignore or Cardinal Mattei, to leave Rome in a month. 
 He represented that the health of the patients depending on 
 him required him to remain at least three months, but, finding 
 that Mattei was under orders, he employed the night in 
 writing a letter to the Pope himself. The next morning 
 Mattei wrote to him-^(' I was a very good friend to 
 Mattei and the Cardinals to some of them I gave physic, 
 and to some I gave dinners ') and asked him what in the 
 world he had written to the Pope which had made him 
 give orders that he (Pantaleone) should leave Rome in 
 twenty-four hours after service of the orders. Mattei added that 
 he would keep it back as long as ever he could, but that ' en 
 revanche' P.-must keep himself in readiness to be off at six 
 hours' instead of 24 hours' notice. P. after a little delay told 
 him he could not conveniently be off till a steamer which left 
 Rome at 1 1 o'clock (say) on Wednesday, to which Mattei 
 replied that that would do very well, as he should see the 
 Pope at once and be able to tell him that he was gone. So 
 Pantaleone took himself off and remained in exile for ten 
 years, till he came back at the tail of the Italian army. 
 
 He declares that he was the emissary of the Italian 
 Government at Paris at the breaking out of the Prussian \var, 
 that he saw in a moment how it would all be ; that he 
 went to Lord Lyons and prevailed on him to prevail on 
 his Government to prevail on Austria to come to a common 
 agreement with Italy and England that none would interfere 
 unless all interfered ; that this served his Government as an 
 excuse for inaction to the Emperor ; that he wanted the 
 Italians to go at once to Rome, but was stopped by the 
 unanswerable reply that they were pledged to the Emperor 
 not to do so ; that the moment the Emperor was down he went 
 to Thiers and Favre and persuaded them that it was not a time
 
 336 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 for France to make enemies, and that if their troops went out 
 of Rome they must not object to the Italians coming in ; that 
 therefore things took the course they had taken, &c., &c., &c., 
 all along of Doctor Pantaleone. He, like all the Italian news- 
 papers, plumes himself on the Italian plan of playing their cards, 
 of securing what is for their interest and doing it, and rejects 
 with scorn the notion that they are wild or exalth. He says 
 it is their character to be prudent. ' An Italian,' he says, 
 'you may observe, never makes an imprudent marriage.' 
 He complained of the want of political intelligence of 
 the nobles, excepting Sermoneta, whom he spoke of as a 
 man of surpassing talent, but surprised me by saying that he 
 failed once as Minister of the Interior because he made a 
 joke of everything a very good joke, because he was full of 
 wit, but no more than a joke ; my impression of him would 
 be of a depressed, gentle person. Of course blindness (joined, 
 I believe, to a painful disease in the arm) is subduing ; but 
 it is only now and then, when his face has lighted up for a 
 moment, that I should have thought him capable of hilarity. 
 Now I connect him with the Prince de Teano (which he then 
 was) who called on Hope in P. Barberini, and kept us laughing 
 by his satirical account of a Derby Day. 
 
 Pantaleone has his theory about the malaria ; it is that it 
 is the result of a minute ' cryptogamous ' plant growing on 
 the damp land, the infection of which is stopped or absorbed 
 by trees. So he purposes to plant a few millions of trees 
 round certain infected tracts, and then, he says, everything 
 else would be healthy. He states that in South America and 
 elsewhere to sleep on the infected side of a strip of wood is 
 certain death on the other side is perfect safety. The only 
 letter I have got beginning ' My dear Blachford ' is one 
 from Gladstone. What a mess about Sir R. Collier ! 4 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 4 The Act required that the mem- higher court. Nobody denied his fit- 
 
 bers of the new Court of Appeal should ness for the post; but it was felt by 
 
 have been previously judges of the many that the Government was ' getting 
 
 ower courts. The Attorney-General, round ' the Act by this technical quali- 
 
 Sir R. Collier, was made a judge and fication. 
 then immediately promoted to the
 
 1872 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 337 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 Blachford : January 27, 1872. 
 
 My dear Kate, I had to splash about a little in London 
 on Wednesday and Thursday, but was none the worse for it. 
 
 Henry Vivian set the bells ringing and very nice bells 
 they are and the men set up an arch of laurel on the gate 
 at the lodge. Unluckily, nobody told us of it ; we, being 
 packed up in a brougham in the dark, did not see it. But 
 we have been to look at it to-day, and said our compliments, 
 and ordered a supper for all concerned. 
 
 Your house is charming. 5 It is now all roofed except the 
 tower. The tower is rising, all the stones cut and on the 
 spot, and the foreman (who, by the way, has a dreadful cold, 
 caught, I suppose, in your service) says the stone arch will be 
 all up in a few days. 
 
 I saw Lord Granville, who was of course civil. He 
 plainly wished me to come up to vote on the question which 
 I must say, in my opinion, improves on acquaintance. 6 
 
 But I shguld think with a hostile H. of Lords it was 
 notwithstanding very likely to turn out the Chancellor [Lord 
 Selborne], whom, by the way, Lord Westbury describes as ' a 
 character unredeemed by a single vice.' I think the chances 
 are that I shall have to be back about the i6th ; then it is 
 on the cards I may not be up again (to say ' up ') till July. 
 In and for July they will want me to stop in town ; Lord G. 
 implied that as to committee I would pretty much please 
 myself, but hoped that before long I should be taking part 
 in the debates. 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Blachford, Ivybridge : February 7, 1872. 
 
 My dear Taylor, The statement that I have been twice 
 at the Colonial Office ought, like other public rumours, to 
 have been halved before being believed. I got there once, 
 almost managed to see Lord Granville (who was a necessity), 
 and dropped a card or two on the other bigwigs to whom 
 
 5 A house was being built by his Sir R. Collier. Votes were important, 
 sister close to Blachford. since the motion was defeated by a 
 
 6 The Opposition moved a vote of majority of only two. 
 censure regarding the appointment of 
 
 Z
 
 338 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 they were urgently due. This in the way of work was about 
 as much as I could manage. But I should have been delighted 
 to see you at Rutland Gate if you would have taken the 
 trouble to come up. 
 
 How I envy your friend King Stephen. 7 But there is no 
 use in envying or wishing to imitate him. I have to pay 
 33/. for my robes, 8o/. or so for a new coat which I have 
 kept at bay this ten years, and am now reduced to get then 
 5<D/. for supporters I being represented by a roebuck, and my 
 wife (this is not a joke, but fact) by a griffin with gold 
 tongue and claws and a gold rosette in her or its buttonhole. 
 And this besides 35O/. for Letters Patent. Well, I am down 
 here, launched in a way, but just at present without being 
 able to touch my future life. I cannot get out to look at 
 anything that has to be looked at, and my indoor time is 
 taken up with ascertaining as a matter of /. s. d, where I 
 stand and what I have to play with so that I cannot set to 
 work even at the paper preliminaries of what is to be done. 
 The griffin with gold rosette meanwhile is trying to reduce to 
 ordei an innumerable army of tables and chests of drawers 
 - -one house containing at the present moment the furniture 
 of three, and being consequently so choked that there is 
 hardly room to make things change places. Then there are 
 piles of old carpets fulfilling your idea of what is due to the 
 peerage. At least, I think they must be of about the same 
 quality as Stephen's breeches. However, the disorderly 
 atoms are beginning to float into their places, and I hope we 
 shall soon be in some degree at peace. 
 
 Remember that we expect all of you here we shall be 
 ready for you. When ? I suppose I must be in town to 
 vote on the Collier case (colliery explosion, I hear it is 
 called), and I shall try somehow or other to catch you. As 
 yet I hardly know where I shall be ; either Blackheath or with 
 the Dean of St. Paul's. 
 
 As to my getting on I should have said, three days ago, 
 
 T Sir II Taylor in a letter to Lord Blachford had quoted the lines : 
 
 ' King Stephen was a worthy peer, 
 His breeches cost him half a crown.' 
 
 (Autobiography of Henry Taylor, ii. 286.)
 
 1872 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 339 
 
 that I was getting well in a gallop. But I have had a check 
 which reminds me that I must be patient. I find it difficult 
 to settle matters between the necessity of exercise and the 
 evils of damp air. The latter has almost taken away my 
 voice, which I thought I had recovered. 
 
 Kindest remembrances to all of you, 
 Ever yours, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 To Lady Blachford. 
 
 The Deanery, St. Paul's : June 6, 1872. 
 
 I had a prosperous silent journey to London, made my 
 way here, and then to the House, after correcting proofs in 
 Burleigh Street 
 
 Lord Russell opened, of course, 8 but I could hardly hear 
 a word he said. Lord Granville in reply was, I thought, very 
 good and persuasive ; then Lord Grey, acrid and not par- 
 ticularly good (as I thought). When he got up the House 
 was crowded, but thereupon an outward current set in, and 
 before he had spoken ten minutes it had half emptied itself. 
 Whilst he was at it, Lord Granville came up to me to ask if 
 I intended to speak. I said no, but as he was going away I 
 mentioned a mistake of Lord Grey's. He, Lord Grey, had 
 attacked Lord Granville for misstatement, the charge depend- 
 ing on the date of a letter printed in the ' Times ' as of May 
 14 (in the correspondence which you looked out for me, and 
 
 8 This debate in the House of Lords adroitness ; but there would have been 
 
 was on a motion made by Lord Russell little opposition to the treaty, of which 
 
 against the 'Alabama 'Arbitration (Lord the general principles were unquestion- 
 
 Russell, as it happened, was Foreign ably fair, had not the American Govern- 
 
 Secretary in July 1862 when the ment (owing, as it afterwards appeared, 
 
 'Alabama,' through want of prompt to the insistence of Mr. Sumner) chosen 
 
 action, slipped out of the Mersey). By to include in their case for the arbitra- 
 
 the Treaty of Washington, in 1871, it tion court claims for 'indirect losses' 
 
 was arranged to submit to arbitration i.e. general loss of trade, prolonga- 
 
 the American claims for damage done tion of the war, &c. , which they 
 
 by the ' Alabama ' during the Civil affected to trace to the cruises of the 
 
 War (besides the disputes about the 'Alabama.' This was manifestly and 
 
 San Juan boundary and the Canadian absurdly unjust, and there is little doubt 
 
 Fisheries). Most of the Conservative that the arbitration must have fallen 
 
 party, and perhaps some others, con- through if the American Government 
 
 sidered the English Commissioners to had not withdrawn the indirect claims, 
 have failed alike in firmness and in
 
 340 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 which I had been studying). I thought it odd, and, on look- 
 ing, it appeared that the dates of the letters (in chronological 
 order) were May 2, May 3, May 14, May 6, and so on. Of 
 course it was evident (and ought to have been so to Lord 
 Grey) that I4th was a misprint for 4th. Lord Granville 
 left me, and, without resuming his seat, walked straight to the 
 table, begged a moment to* explain, and said that the date of 
 the letter was not the I4th, but the 4th, and sat down. I was 
 alarmed and rushed down to explain that it was the I4th in 
 the ' Times.' ' Oh ! ' he said, ' all right we have it here,' and 
 in a moment Lord Ripon was up and shaking the' New York 
 Herald ' with the true date in Lord Grey's face. The matter was 
 nothing, but I was amused at the audacious promptitude with 
 which Lord Granville acted on my suggestion (for it was hardly 
 more) that the date was wrongly printed. It is just his way. 
 
 Well, then came Lord Denman, with still more violent 
 ebb-tide among their lordships, and it became evident to me, 
 as it had to them, that it was a convenient time for dinner. 
 While I was thus usefully employed Lord Stratford spoke 
 how, I know not and Lord Derby began, and after my return 
 went on without great effect. His line is not, I think, attack. 
 If he is not sensible and considerate he appears to me not to 
 be much, and in attack, sense and consideration are not the 
 successful qualities. 
 
 Lord Kimberley was good. Lord Salisbury was very 
 clever indeed, and very acrimonious. His sentences told, 
 however, and I could hardly help myself cheering at his 
 proposal that Lowe, or ' still better' Ayrton, should have been 
 sent out to deal with the Yankees instead of Lord Ripon. It 
 was certainly brilliant, and people, some on our side of the 
 house, evidently enjoyed the pokes at the Yankees, and did 
 not like the want of spirit of ministers' policy. Also the 
 Duke of Somerset and Lord Westbury have established a 
 corner for themselves, just behind the ministerial bench ; a 
 kind of little, very little Adullam in the most effective place 
 geographically for being ' nasty ;' and they, it was evident, 
 were not discoursing good to their friends, though I heard 
 (could not help hearing) one say, as in a tone of consultation : 
 ' We can't prevent a division ! '
 
 1872 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 341 
 
 Then Lord Ripon nil ; Lord Malmesbury nil ; Lord, 
 Westbury spoke from a false position. Of course he was 
 clear, flowing, and amusing now and then, but the amuse- 
 ment was principally from a sense of the absurd insolence with 
 which he managed to convey his contempt for the ministers 
 and all their helpers, and he was in this difficulty that he was 
 desirous, or affected to be so, of preventing the adverse vote 
 while he was equally desirous to intensify the feeling of dis- 
 satisfaction with ministers which justified (if anything could 
 justify) the vote ; hence he had so to distribute his arguments 
 as to serve both purposes, and did not make a consistent 
 whole. 
 
 Then a youthful maiden speech from Lord Rosebery, and 
 the great speech of the evening from Cairns. His speeches 
 are very like one another, and very unpleasant for those against 
 whom they are directed from their extreme excellence of 
 arrangement and terrible lucidity. It seems as if you had 
 never done with him. He makes a case against you a clear, 
 incisive case and then when that is worked out, and you are 
 thinking how to get out of the scrape, you begin to find that 
 what you have as yet heard is not the scrape, but only the 
 beginning of it ; the foundation of a series of aggravations 
 and misfortunes which sink you deeper in the mire and close 
 all avenues of escape. Yet through all this there is a feeling 
 that there is a fallacy here, and an exaggeration (not of 
 language, but of thought) there, and that with time, and 
 power, and liberty to write a book on the subject, a tolerably 
 good book might be made of ' the dissector dissected.' You 
 feel that it is a skilful accumulation of all that is bad and a 
 skilful exclusion of all that is good, which really places the 
 affair, as a whole, on the most utterly false footing. However, 
 he is very unpleasant to his adversaries, and his sentiment, 
 when he tries it, is neat bunkum. 
 
 He and Lord Westbury, as you will have seen, both echoed 
 the claptrap about Bernard's ' less accurate.' 9 
 
 9 Mr. Mountague Bernard (then Pro- The others were Lord Ripon (then 
 
 fessor of Internationa] Law at Oxford) Lord de Grey), Sir Stafford Northcote, 
 
 had been one of the English Com mis- and Sir Edward Thornton, 
 sioners for the Treaty of Washington.
 
 342 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 .... To-day I hunted up Lord Granville to ask whether 
 he would like me to speak, and he said Yes, very much, unless 
 the Opposition were well enough drilled to keep silence ; in 
 which case, as the Chancellor and the Duke of Argyll wanted 
 to speak, a third speaker on the same side would be improper. 
 
 .... Going down to the House rather late (6 o'clock), as 
 I knew the Chancellor was to be long, I was met by the news 
 that Fish l had telegraphed that, subject to our agreement as 
 to future proceedings, the United States Government con- 
 sidered the additional article as a withdrawal of the indirect 
 claims. 
 
 Lord Ripon, who told me of this, told me that the news 
 exploded like a shell among the hostile ranks. Of course it 
 made it necessary to withdraw Lord Russell's motion, but 
 Lord Russell was nowhere to be found to withdraw it. Lord 
 Ripon wanted to propose that Lady Russell, then present, 
 should withdraw it, as Lord Russell's deputy, from the gallery. 
 But at last Lord Russell himself was, I suppose, found, and 
 the whole affair is over for the present. And my beautiful 
 speech, about which I felt an odd mixture of terror and 
 amusement, is lost to the world. 
 
 .... Church gets credit with those from whom credit is 
 compliment for his dealings with the Lord Mayor. People 
 (some) thank him for his dignified rebuke. Vide correspon- 
 dence printed by Lord Mayor. 2 
 
 To Lady Blachford. 
 
 The Deanery, St. Paul's : June 8, 1872. 
 
 My dear Georgie, Not much more to say, except that, as 
 you see by the enclosed, I have not got off my ' endowed 
 schools.' 
 
 Yesterday I had my second sitting at the Appellate 
 Jurisdiction Committee. Sir Barnes Peacock examined, and 
 gave us long accounts of the mode of administering justice in 
 
 1 Mr. Fish was Secretary of State executive committee, that Mr. Burgess 
 
 in the United States. should be asked to submit plans for the 
 
 - The Lord Mayor had proposed to completion of St. Paul's. The corre- 
 
 call a meeting of the subscribers to re- spondence is printed in the Times of 
 
 consider the arrangement made by the Jun , 1872.
 
 1872 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 343 
 
 India, without much reference to the consideration whether it 
 was relevant to the appeal question. 
 
 We were rather amused, in the middle of a grave cross- 
 examination, by the interposition of Lord Chelmsford (to the 
 shorthand writer), ' I don't desire this to be taken down : ' 
 then : ' Sir Barnes, I am glad to find that you are able to give 
 a positive denial to the statement made in Lord Brougham's 
 autobiography that you died in India.' 
 
 We were all so completely taken in by the confidential 
 exordium to the shorthand writer, and the gravity with which 
 the question was delivered, that there was a regular burst of 
 laughter when the shot went off. 
 
 . . . Then Sir H. Mayne was examined, and there was a 
 discussion carried on, I thought, very pleasantly between the 
 bigwigs Cairns taking decidedly the lead ; and I think the 
 inquiry will not last so long as I had supposed. It seems to 
 me that they are all pretty well agreed, in principle, except 
 on the question whether the proposed court shall keep up a 
 purely colourable connexion with the House of Lords. 
 
 Church says that there is in the city a considerable cry 
 against the Puseyite chapter. But, though he is continually 
 saying how much better it would be to make Lightfoot Dean 
 I do not see that the cry is a trouble or scare to him. And I 
 think he seems to feel himself a match for the Lord Mayor, 
 Cavendish Bentinck & Co. If he talks about things, it is not 
 in the tone of a man at all puzzled or at sea, or in want of 
 opinions, but by way of letting off schemes. He catches at a 
 hint if it is good, but he does not the least seem to want 
 advice as a stay. 
 
 Bernard was here yesterday, and seemed in better spirits 
 than I expected. He talked freely enough, and took all those 
 rubbishy criticisms 3 for what they are worth. At least, so it 
 seemed. Church rather invited or encouraged me after dinner 
 to tell Bernard what I should have said in the House of 
 Lords at which he seemed pleased. I did it gladly because 
 I thought he would be encouraged by the free, aggressive, 
 thorough-going way in which I proposed to have said (in effect) 
 that the main article of the Treaty was good and sufficient and 
 
 8 See note on the previous letter.
 
 344 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix: 
 
 well considered, and that, with all the general cry about its 
 ambiguity, nobody who looked into the matter had yet dared 
 to say that the arguments by which its meaning was esta- 
 blished had any sort of flaw in them or were anything short of 
 conclusive, except Lord Cairns ; and that his only argument 
 was such that it really was an admission that with all his 
 efforts to say something he had nothing to say. 
 
 It is no doubt a triumph for the Government, but there 
 are still difficulties to be got over ; the main one being the 
 difficulty of making that which is nothing take a colourable 
 appearance of being something. 
 
 Meantime the adjournment, while it has (by letting in this 
 incident) prevented a beating, has left the Opposition aratori- 
 cally in possession of the field ; their great speech (Cairns) 
 remaining unanswered. 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Blachford : November 25, 1872. 
 
 My dear Taylor, ' Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima 
 culpa.' I am lazy, and not only that, but lazier every day. 
 Rural life certainly tends to comatosity. But, moreover, a 
 man in the country has nothing to say except just now that 
 f the rain it raineth every day ; ' and the more entertaining a 
 letter you receive, the more ashamed you are to send in 
 return a yawn. 
 
 I will look up your letter, but I feel somewhat doubtful 
 about finding it. I have been criminally careless about papers 
 of all kinds (except Colonial Office proper) for the last ten 
 years, and upon this looseness of custody has come the 
 upheaving of a change of residence into a house filled with 
 other people's property ; so till my sisters and their belongings 
 are gone, I do not know what I have or where I have it, or 
 how to look for it. In a few days, I hope, I shall begin to 
 investigate. 
 
 Your account of your London doings almost tempts me 
 to come up to the Deanery to look at you. Meantime, about 
 your autobiography. You asked me what I thought about 
 printing letters z>. whether you should tell your story, or
 
 1872 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 345 
 
 exhibit it by extracts. At first I thought I could say nothing 
 but that you must judge for yourself on inspection of the 
 letters. But I think I have something more to say, though 
 not much. It seems to me that if an event or impression 
 which deserves a place on its own historical merits in your 
 autobiography is recorded in your, correspondence, or if a 
 certain correspondence is in itself a fact in your life, there is 
 prima facie reason for exhibiting it by extracts from the 
 correspondence ; it is more authentically, and very likely 
 more vividly, stated. But it appears to me that an auto- 
 biographer should be much on his guard against printing 
 letters merely because, however rightly, he thinks them good. 
 To publish correspondence on account of its intrinsic value is 
 rather for a man's friends than for himself. And to do it is 
 to come out of doors in undress, and seems to me to savour 
 of self-exhibition, which I take to be the danger of auto- 
 biography. It is as if Sydney Smith had published a volume 
 of his ' Table Talk.' 
 
 Therefore, though I think that extracts from your letters 
 are likely to be among the very most interesting parts of your 
 book, yet I should like them only where it was (or appeared 
 to be) the case that they were only introduced for the purpose 
 of telling what had to be, or could not better be, told. Have 
 you looked at Stanley's Arnold ? He is considered to have 
 handled correspondence"very successfully. But that is not 
 ^z/ta-biography. 
 
 That poor old fellow to whom you gave some medicated 
 wadding, and who would like to have given you a present, is 
 dead, poor fellow. He did not leave you anything in his will ; 
 but was very anxious to explain to those whom he left behind 
 the amount of his debts, which were, I think, two and sixpence 
 for a shovel and two shillings for repairing some tools. He 
 was, I think, the only link with the generation of my grand- 
 father whom he remembered swearing, as he did when he 
 was angry, ' By my salvation.' It is creditable that the bad 
 words (if these are to be called such) are reported never to 
 have gone any further. My sister was told that the old man 
 wandered very much, but had been quieter for some time 
 ' after the Lord came to him' I was horrified to find that
 
 346 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 ' the Lord ' meant me. I supposed it something quite 
 different. 
 
 What a state the Continent is in monarchy asserting 
 itself in France, and nobility shattered in Germany. In one 
 thing I have profound faith, the ascendency of snobs 
 
 To Rev. E. Rogers. 
 
 London : February 15, 1873 
 
 My dear Edward, As to Chronicle. The Queen's speech 
 went off tamely enough. Those who desire to depreciate the 
 Washington Treaty went on pecking at it, but I suppose the 
 thing is at an end. Since that time attendance on the House 
 of Lords has been simply formal and stupid, except on Thurs- 
 day, when Palmer opened his scheme of Land Reform, going 
 through the whole matter with great clearness and scrupulous 
 desire to butter their lordships into acquiescence. And from 
 Cairns's speech I should anticipate an easy passage for the 
 whole. The difference between them reduces itself to a 
 question on the Appellate Jurisdiction of the House of Lords, 
 which is retained in respect of Scotland and Ireland, but 
 extinguished as to England (where appeals to them are com- 
 paratively infrequent). Cairns proposes to leave the appeal 
 to the House of Lords in those English cases in which the 
 two courts through which the case must reach them disagree, 
 abolishing it only when those two courts are unanimous 
 a faint difference which cannot greatly signify, I should think. 
 The Bishop of Salisbury 4 has been here all the time 
 (leaving to-day), very pleasant and full of life. At Nobody's, 5 
 on Wednesday, 1 got between Harrison and Kenyon and 
 spent a pleasant evening, only disturbed by the necessity of 
 making a speech bad, but short. On Thursday we had 
 Oakeley of Balliol here, evidently most happy at going back 
 with Moberley to old times, in which he seems very much to 
 live, and about which, he says, he is continually dreaming (I 
 mean literally). It was rather pathetic. However, I saw very 
 little of him, having been kept till eight in the House, and 
 then dining at the Club with or next to Coleridge, Bruce, 
 
 4 Dr. Moberley. s A dining club.
 
 1873 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 347 
 
 and Acland. Coleridge is sanguine about Gladstone's Irish 
 University Bill. He seems to have started with the Cabinet 
 against him and to have converted them all (their point being, 
 I presume, to have something that would pass], especially 
 Lowe, whom Coleridge describes as full of admiration for the 
 clearness of the scheme. I don't understand it, but I imagine 
 that it just gives or leaves to everybody enough to stop their 
 mouths without infuriating their neighbours. 
 
 I have had one or two talks with (or rather from) Lord 
 Kimberley, who hands the Colonial Church question over to 
 the bishops and me, and I am accordingly to meet Selwyn, 
 Moberley, Isambard Brunei (a canon-lawyer, and a friend of 
 Froude's) at Lambeth on Tuesday, to feel our way. I had a 
 few words with Lord Granville, and a long talk (not about 
 much) with Lord Carnarvon, who wants me to yacht with him 
 in the Mediterranean till Easter, which would not suit my 
 book in any way. 
 
 To Rev. E. Rogers. 
 
 London : March 28, 1873. 
 
 My dear E., Well, the great event has gone off, and I 
 hope satisfactorily. 6 (I may as well say that the ' Times ' has 
 simply made a speech out of the bill having no affectation of 
 similarity with any part of what I said.) 
 
 Having fortified myself with cold beef, and, according to 
 V.'s especial advice, with soda-water and sherry, I proceeded 
 down with G. and deposited her in the gallery opposite me, 
 and took my place, speculating on the quantity and quality 
 of my audience, which appeared (ten minutes before the time) 
 rather thin and disconsolate. I had previously, i.e. since the 
 beef and soda-water, rehearsed my speech to myself in St. 
 James's Park, so I felt I had no more to do or think about. 
 The Bishops' bench of course filled. Canterbury, York, Win- 
 chester, Carlisle, Lichfield, Salisbury, and some others. Then 
 the House filled fairly, and I was told that the Duke of Rich- 
 mond would follow me. I had a pretty good notion that 
 Cairns and Belmore would follow on the same side (i.e. on the 
 
 6 The debate on the Colonial Church Bill, which Lord Blachford introduced 
 (see above, p. 305).
 
 348 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 Scotch and Irish points). Two or three formal things were 
 disposed of when Lefevre solemnly proclaimed : ' Second read- 
 ing of the Colonial Church Bill. Lord Blachford.' I did not 
 feel the slightest nervousness, and began, as I thought, speak- 
 ing very distinctly and with ease. They seemed to listen 
 attentively, but as I approached the only little bit of liveliness 
 in the speech, without the vestige of a cheer (which, indeed, 
 would have been out of place), I felt how difficult it was before 
 such an audience to lift oneself beyond the mere statements 
 of fact and argument which were necessary. However, I 
 went at it and, the passage being obviously one which invited 
 a cheer, I got one. Lord Granville, who had turned and 
 looked attentively at me in a way which gives heart, had said 
 
 * Speak louder,' which I attended to for a moment, and then, 
 I am afraid, forgot. I think he led off this cheer. Then I 
 went on, still feeling as if I were attended to up to the end. 
 
 Then got up the Duke of Richmond, but, as they say, 
 
 * yielded to ' the Archbishop of Canterbury, who paid me 
 some compliments (vide ' Times '), observing that my speech 
 justified the sound judgment of the bishops in not bringing in 
 the bill themselves, but asking me to do it. Then he went 
 into some statistics to show the size of the Colonial Church, 
 and therefore of the grievances. Then followed the Opposi- 
 tion : Duke of Richmond, Cairns, Belmore, Courtown, broken 
 by Archbishop of York, Bishop of Winchester, and Lord 
 Chancellor on what I may call my side. The argument was 
 entirely on their side, nobody attempting really to meet them, 
 and was directed not against the colonial part of the bill, 
 which everybody accepted, but against the bearing of the bill 
 on Scotch and Irish. I got a full share of compliment for 
 knowledge of the subject. The complimenters were Duke of 
 Richmond, Lord Cairns, Archbishop of Canterbury, and Lord 
 Kimberley clenched them by saying that the subject (which 
 all agreed had been clearly presented to them) was without 
 any exception the most difficult to understand or explain 
 that he had ever met with. 
 
 The Archbishop, with a kind of side hit, said that the 
 Church had a claim on me to extricate them from the difficulty, 
 as it had been my influence with successive Secretaries of
 
 1873 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 349 
 
 State that had got them into it. When it was over, Lord 
 Granville came up to me and sat down and said, ' Well, I 
 congratulate you on your great success. We have been agree- 
 ing that you said in twenty minutes what it would have taken 
 Cairns an hour and a half to say." 
 
 ... I have little hope of its passing this session. But I 
 am not sure that it may not stand a better chance on the 
 whole by being hammered out in Select Committee, and 
 passed in the House of Lords this session, and then re-intro- 
 duced fresh and approved, quite at the beginning of next 
 session. 
 
 I almost think I shall make and send to the ' Guardian ' 
 a report of my speech. It is really wanted, as a brief for 
 those who talk about it now or may have to talk about it in 
 the House of Commons. I think, viewed as establishing my 
 character, I have satisfied their lordships that I can state 
 intelligibly a difficult case, that I shall not unnecessarily trouble 
 them with words, and that though the subject was a dry one, 
 I have the capacity (to some extent) of being otherwise than 
 dry. 
 
 Lord Stanley of Alderley made the House laugh by speak- 
 ing of the ' noble lord ' (me) ' and the other Right Rev. 
 Prelates.' 
 
 I must finish, both because I must be off, and because my 
 eyes are shaking. 7 
 
 To Lady Blachford. 
 
 London : July 8, 1873. 
 
 I got on pretty fairly with my committee yesterday, but 
 was worried by Archbishops, who started various hares of 
 their own, and a fresh hare is to be started by the Bishop of 
 Winchester to-morrow. 
 
 Lord Shaftesbury got a baiting from Lord Salisbury and 
 the Chancellor yesterday.* Lord S. made him appear 
 
 7 It is well to note that the descrip- sonal parts of such letters are, however, 
 
 tions of this and some other debates in inserted because it is thought that they 
 
 which Lord Blachford took part were are not without a general interest, 
 written solely to give pleasure to his s Lord Shaftesbury introduced a bill 
 
 near relations. Some of the more per- to prevent frauds in charitable funds.
 
 350 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD OH. ix 
 
 blundering, and the Chancellor made the whole House laugh 
 at him, so that he fairly lost his temper, and told them that if 
 he was so treated he would never be philanthropical again. 
 Selborne pointed out that certain wives of Archbishops and 
 even of Prime Ministers were concerned in ' charitable institu- 
 tions,' and unless they kept their accounts correctly to the 
 minutest particular and posted over the door ' at Lambeth or 
 Carlton H. Gardens ' in legible Roman characters the nature 
 of their institution and the hours of the day at which their 
 accounts would be open to the inspection of subscribers, they 
 would be liable on the first offence to imprisonment with hard 
 labour (without the alternative of a fine), and for the second 
 to penal servitude. 
 
 Lord Salisbury had got up saying that ' with all respect,' 
 &c., for his noble friend, there was nothing which he heard of 
 with greater apprehension and horror than legislation by a dis- 
 tinguished philanthropist ; then he proceeded to cut the bill 
 to bits, ending by saying that as it was not to go beyond 
 the second reading he would not oppose it, but hoped that in 
 the recess it would be mended. 
 
 Then Selborne began by saying that he could not help 
 thinking that his noble friend was taking a lenient view of 
 the bill when he proposed to let it have a second reading ; 
 and then proceeded to expose it as a piece of laughable 
 tyranny, in a way which the House thoroughly appreciated. 
 
 I suppose Shaftesbury will take it out of them by 
 some special ferocity on Monday. I rather shiver to think 
 what may happen. 
 
 To Hon. Mrs. Legge. 
 
 Blachford : August 25, 1873. 
 
 My dear Marian, You will have heard about the Man- 
 oeuvres. Cardwell's visit was on the whole successful, in spite 
 of misadventures, which were certainly many. In the first 
 place the weather and other things wholly put an end to the 
 sham fights on which we had counted for Monday and Tues- 
 day. The weather also destroyed (except as a matter of
 
 1873 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 351 
 
 business) a party which Cardwell 9 had planned for the inspec- 
 tion of the fortifications in the Sound. Cardwell's luggage 
 and servants missed trains at Plymouth. Storks 1 left his 
 luggage in London. Edward and I both met with accidents 
 which disabled us from riding. Northcote was thrown from 
 his horse and also laid up for a day. Our carriage broke a 
 spring on our way to the march past, and I and Bruno upset 
 an intoxicated pedestrian coming home ; so that to have 
 sent everybody away pleased as I really think we did was 
 rather creditable to all parties concerned. 
 
 The great point was that the 2 1st was beautiful. The 
 site was not so good as Ringmoor, but very fine, and the 
 day was absolutely perfect, cool and warm, with plenty of 
 sun and flying clouds and clear distances. 2 
 
 The sight was less picturesque and instructive, but more 
 imposing of course, than anything we had had before, and 
 our carriage though late, owing to the broken spring 
 had the best possible place. After the show we had 
 luncheon with Sir C. Staveley to meet the Prince. G. was 
 opposite to him, and in the knot of conversation of which 
 he was the centre. I was next General Smith, com- 
 manding the ist division, who was strong in praises of his 
 soldiers no complaints even of incivility, all cheerful and in 
 the best spirits in spite of the rain, and all, men and horses, in 
 the best health. He had a strong view of the benefit of the 
 soldiers' recreation rooms, and said that he had walked round 
 one of them, while some fifty or sixty men were engaged in 
 writing and reading, without any of them perceiving that he 
 had come in and gone out. . . . 
 
 I walked yesterday to Anglepool, on the Erme. The bed 
 was a raging mass of rush and foam, the whole of the rocks 
 being absolutely covered. The same flood drowned poor 
 Colonel Mackenzie. I have crossed the ford where he was 
 drowned once or twice lately. 
 
 9 Secretary of State for War at that - These military manoeuvres were on 
 
 time. Dartmoor near Cadover Bridge, a few 
 
 1 Sir Henry Storks, see p. 265. miles from Blachford.
 
 352 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Blachford : October 23, 1873. 
 
 My dear Taylor, We are just now recovering our breath, 
 in solitude and torrents of rain, from a course of visitors, partly 
 pleasure and partly duty. 
 
 This is the first year in which we have set to work to get 
 through conscientiously what we ' ought ' to do in that way. 
 And the autumn manoeuvres weighted us further with Cardwell, 
 Storks, and others. We had the Dean, and wished for you 
 and yours. 
 
 Have you ever seen military manoeuvres on anything of a 
 scale in anything of a country ? They are exceedingly 
 beautiful. The scampering of artillery and infantry to cover, 
 the fighting from cover, the clustering for attack, the indica- 
 tions, and conjectures, and appearances of troops (in a sham 
 fight) from expected or unexpected quarters all give a great 
 deal of flesh to one's imaginations of real battles, if (as was 
 our case) you can get a good commanding situation where you 
 are in the thick of what is going on on one side. 
 
 I cannot quite make out to my own satisfaction whether 
 I am or am not doing anything besides entertaining visitors. 
 I find myself keeping a lot of labourers at work about this and 
 that, stirring them up, insisting, hunting up omissions, deciding 
 on cottages and lines of fencing. And I think certain people, 
 and certain grounds, and certain woods will be to a certain 
 extent more comfortable and pretty and productive for what 
 I do ; but it is so unlike what I have been accustomed to call 
 work that I do not know whether it is so or not. There is 
 a tremendous proportion of gossip and dawdling in it. 
 
 Do you keep your eye on Spain ? I was rather amused 
 at a young naval officer's account of Admiral Yelverton's pro- 
 ceedings, which furnished the explanation, which I have 
 always thought the most probable one, of Lord Russell's pre- 
 ference for post captains as diplomatists. Admiral Yelverton 
 had first required a delay of bombardment for four days, to 
 which he added two more at the request of the French Com- 
 modore, and sent an English captain to communicate this
 
 1873 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 353 
 
 extended prohibition to the ' Intransigente ' commander. 3 The 
 ' Intransigente ' stormed and blustered, and said with many 
 words that he should do as he liked. The Englishman, being 
 a man economical of the Queen's English, merely said : ' You 
 had better not. Good morning/ and stepped into his boat. 
 
 The next day the ' Numencia ' took up a position of offence, 
 on which the ' Lord Warden ' (of which my young friend is, 
 I think, first lieutenant) swept up to her side, close. The 
 ' Numencia ' asked what he or she meant, to which answer was 
 given : ' To sink you if you fire a shot.' The diplomacy was 
 completely effectual for its purpose. But then it was con- 
 ducted under circumstances of advantage. 
 
 Certainly conservatism is strong in the ' Paullo post 
 futurum.' Dizzy, Chambord, and Carlos. The Count of 
 Chambord's position just now illustrates what I am in the 
 habit of thinking, that in one sense ' nothing succeeds like 
 (ill) success.' 
 
 If you want to be praised by opponents, acquire a habit 
 of failing. Sir R. Inglis had the full benefit of this. And for 
 a certain time he of Chambord had. Liberal papers were full 
 of his power, and honesty, and logical consistency, and so on, 
 so long as they considered that his impracticability was playing 
 their game. But now that the poor man is showing something 
 of a certain bewildered common-sense, and appears to have a 
 kind of possibility of winning after a fashion, he becomes an 
 impostor and traitor, and I do not know what else. 4 
 
 Good-bye, and kindest regards to all of you from us. 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 3 The ' Numencia ' was one of the * It was reported in the papers of 
 
 insurgent frigates from Cartagena, which October 18, 1873, that the Comte 
 
 was bombarding Alicante. Early in de Chambord was prepared to make 
 
 the following year, when Cartagena sur- concessions ; but in his leiter to M. 
 
 rendered to the troops of the Madrid Chesneslong a few days later (Oct. 27) 
 
 Government (Jan. II, 1874), the he absolutely refused to substitute the 
 
 'Numencia' took off the insurgent tricolor for the white flag, and whatever 
 
 Junta to Oran and surrendered to the hopes of his success may have been 
 
 French. entertained at once disappeared. 
 
 A A
 
 354 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 To Dean Church. 
 
 May 30, 1874. 
 
 My dear Church, Thank you. I should have liked very 
 much to have come up to meet Newman, and I have just got 
 Coleridge's letter asking me to do so. But I have a houseful 
 for Whitsun week, and, though I could steal a day or two, it 
 would not be very gracious. So, after hesitating till Coleridge's 
 letter forced me to say ' yes ' or ' no/ I have decided to stay 
 here. 
 
 My wife is in distress at the loss of one of her Guernsey 
 cows milk fever after giving birth to a calf. I wish you 
 could have seen the way in which our cowman received my 
 suggestion that, as the poor creature could not survive, and 
 was only suffering, she should be put out of her pain. He had 
 'niver heerd of a cow being killed that way.' I felt at once 
 that I had to apologise, and said that it was to save the poor 
 creature suffering, to which he said gravely that ' All living 
 beings had to suffer when it came to the end.' I think he 
 felt that ' He who killeth a cow was as if he slew a man.' So 
 he stayed up all night with her till she died in the morning. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 The Deanery, St. Paul's : July 15, 1874. 
 
 My dear Taylor, I have never answered your letter, 
 nearly a month old (June 23), because I was in continual hopes 
 of answering it by a telegram asking you to bed me the next 
 day. But it is inconceivable how, with very little really to do, 
 there is always something which is just enough to prevent you 
 from being a free agent. . . . What a worry passing a bill is ! 
 I do not wonder at. what I used to think the cowardly indis- 
 position of our chiefs to take one in hand. In my case there 
 is an execrable clergyman who would seem to have given his 
 whole mind to the Colonial Clergy Bill, except that I hear he 
 contrives to be as great a bore to other persons on other sub- 
 jects one of those creatures of minute, patchy learning, who 
 arc always being led astray by some laboriously acquired
 
 1874 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 355 
 
 shred of knowledge, which, if he understood more, he would 
 understand to be nothing to the purpose, but which enables 
 him to impose on M.P.s who know less than himself, and 
 so to give honest men like myself an amount of trouble for 
 which I can only forgive him in my capacity of Christian. 
 Well, ' Peace be with him ' which in Latin is pereat male, 
 or at least pereat. 
 
 Gladstone's apparition is curious. I am sorry to say I 
 cannot go with him on either of his points indeed, I may 
 almost say, on any. I see no reason why the Scotch Church 
 should not have their way about patronage. I think the cry 
 against the Public Worship Bill a scare, and I particularly 
 object to the working and principle of the Endowed Schools 
 Act. 5 However, everybody seems to agree that he made a 
 great speech on the Public Worship Bill as a matter of oratory 
 He does not seem to care much about what was his party, 
 who, I suppose, are dead against him on two out of three of 
 these points. 
 
 To Dean Church. 
 
 Blachford : July 21, 1874. 
 
 My dear Church, My eyes are almost out of my head 
 with writing. But I cannot help saying how very much I 
 like that letter of yours to the ' Times.' It is in every respect 
 excellent. 6 I see why you put in the sentence about swapping. 
 And I think, what you could not expect, that I should have 
 taken off a little of the edge of one or two expressions about 
 
 5 Mr. Gladstone reappeared in Par- 1869 Act) to the Charity Commissioners, 
 
 liament on July 6 to oppose the Bill and also made provision for retaining 
 
 for the Abolition of Church Patronage connection with the Church, if pre- 
 
 (Scotland), having taken no part in scribed by the founder, in the case of 
 
 debates since the first nights of the schools founded since the Toleration 
 
 session (i.e. about four months before). Act of William and Mary. (In adopt- 
 
 He opposed Archbishop Tail's Act for ing this limit Mr. Forster's amending 
 
 the Regulation of Public Worship when Act of 1873 was followed, iq preference 
 
 it was introduced into the House of to Lord Sandford's original draft). 
 
 Commons on July 9. He also opposed 6 The letter of Dean Howson (on the 
 
 the Bill for Amending the Endowed subject of the ritual in the Eucharist), 
 
 Schools Act of 1869. This. Amending and Dean Church's reply, appeared iu 
 
 Bill transferred the powers of the Com- the Times of July 18 and 20.- 
 mission of Endowed Schools (under the 
 
 A A 2
 
 356 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 the Ritualists. But these do not at all affect the impression 
 produced by the letter, which seems to me excellent in every 
 direction, as against Howson in particular, persecutors in 
 general and ritualists, and as asserting the Anglican sacrificial 
 doctrine, which, without understanding what it amounts to, I 
 quite see ought to be asserted as you have asserted it. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 To Dean Church. 
 
 Blachford : July 22, 1874. 
 
 My dear Church, I return Newman's letter. I wish he 
 had fiddled. 
 
 I dare say writing your letter was a fret to you. But you 
 were evidently bursting with what you had to say before I 
 left you. And I think it rather a godsend that Howson fur- 
 nished the negative electricity necessary for an explosion. 
 You would have died of suppressed Tractarianism if something 
 had not occurred to determine it to the surface. 
 
 I shall be much disappointed if it does not do much good. 
 It just arrests the tendency of well-enough-meaning men to 
 take for granted that the doctrine of sacrifice is Popery. And 
 I wish to point out that the fact of your being Dean, and the 
 eminence which you have acquired as Dean, is what makes it 
 possible for you thus to speak with effect ex cathedrA. 
 
 It seems to me a thoroughly well-planted blow, and I 
 suppose a reponse sans rtplique. 
 
 Yours ever affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Blachford : November 27, 1874. 
 
 My dear Taylor, What a curious series of publications 
 Gladstone is pouring forth ! Ritualism, Rome, and Bishop 
 Patteson. ... I think I am sorry that he has gone in at 
 Rome. I have a strong belief, in spite of all appearances to 
 the contrary, that, with patience and justice, eveTTTrish Roman 
 Catholicism can be mitigated into sense. But it requires all 
 the power of such a man as Gladstone to control the ebulli-
 
 1874 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 357 
 
 tions of our Protestantism while the process of taming is 
 going on. And if he sets himself to widen the breach between 
 the countries, as his pamphlet must do, I do not know who is 
 to patch it up. 
 
 Have you observed a Canadian case, in which Christian 
 burial is denied a man for belonging to a society which has in 
 its library books prohibited by the Index ? There is to my 
 mind something singular and rather impressive in the daring 
 which not only proclaims the doctrines of the Syllabus &c., 
 but is beginning in remote parts of the world to give effect 
 to them. It seems as if the Pope really supposed himself 
 capable of effecting such a revolution as would turn the 
 Roman Catholic body into a society floating separately about 
 the face of the earth, like the Jews or Quakers of the last 
 century, or the Three Children in Nebuchadnezzar's furnace. 
 Either he must be rather foolish, or Roman Catholics must 
 be a more docile body than I have ever supposed possible. 
 Of course one always knew that there was such a thing as 
 the ' Index,' but when you practically come across the idea 
 that a Roman congregation really assumes to tell some 200 
 or 300 millions of people, adults, litterateurs, and all what 
 they shall or shall not read, it seems like a dream. 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Blachford : December 30, 1874. 
 
 And now as to egotism which is always a pleasant indul- 
 gence if it did not bring to a head certain unpleasant 
 thoughts which without such definite self-consideration would 
 
 o 
 
 be mere floating vapours. 
 
 The unpleasant thought here is that I waste a great deal 
 of time, partly from idleness, partly from want of method, 
 partly from want of an interesting task to pick up my stray 
 ends of time, partly from the real interruptions of country 
 life on such a property as this, and partly because, when I get 
 keen about anything requiring continuous use of eyes, I get 
 pulled up short by them more easily than you would suppose 
 from Colonial Office recollections. At this moment the letters 
 are floating or rather quivering before me.
 
 358 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 I have had a good many floating intentions on coming 
 here county business of a public kind, experiments on the 
 poor, improvement of estate, literary work, society of neigh- 
 bours and visitors, parish improvements moral and physical, 
 and so on. On this came the very disturbing influence of 
 Parliament. And I am only now beginning to find out into 
 what form all these things are condensing. 
 
 In the first place county business has not, and county 
 society has hardly, come near me. This is, I suppose, partly 
 because I have not met society half-way, keeping aloof from 
 the occasions when men do mostly congregate balls, races, 
 agricultural meetings, archery, platforms of all sorts and sizes 
 and this again is partly from taste, and partly because I 
 have desired to see my way before plunging into anything 
 like expense. 
 
 In the second place, material work, building, planting, 
 draining, and so on, takes hold on me. Everybody has a 
 kind of ambition which is by no means what he most approves, 
 but which he feels congenial. Now I am defectively defec- 
 tive in intellectual, or social, or political, or philanthropical 
 ambition. If I accomplish anything in these departments 
 as I know it is my duty to accomplish it it is as a task, 
 which only carries with it the pleasure a great one of 
 accomplishing a task. The measuring yourself against a 
 difficulty and overcoming it, whether weeding a grass lawn 
 or solving a problem, is a pleasure when you have once 
 made the effort of beginning. But as a matter of ambition 
 I think my pet object would be changing the face of a 
 country. To feel that fields, and woods, and cottages, and 
 roads, and the faces of men, women, and children had changed 
 their character since I had had the handling of a territory, 
 would be the thing which I should really enjoy in the pro- 
 spect, and in the progress, and in the result. 
 
 So this is taking hold of me. I dare say I waste more 
 time and money than I ought on improvements that are 
 luxuries, but I also say to myself that I should like, if possible, 
 before I die or become past work, to be able to think that 
 everybody on my property is, except for his or her own fault, 
 as well lodged, with reference to his station in life, as I am
 
 1874 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 359 
 
 with regard to mine. I am making trie-first advances to this, 
 and in doing so I am beginning to enlarge the very pleasant 
 relations which existed between Blachford and the labourers 
 in my mother's time (charity proper I leave to my wife). 
 Those who were mere labourers, and sometimes dull ones, are 
 beginning to contract with me for work, and I think are in a 
 way to rise in comfort and intelligence. And this is in some 
 degree an excuse for spending perhaps more than I ought 
 on beautifying my own house, grounds, and pretty places. 
 
 However, this, though it causes a good many interruptions, 
 does not take up any great proportion of time, and ought 
 not, and I hope will not take up hereafter the time it does 
 now. Also I do not doubt that I waste a good deal of money 
 which is not only inconvenient in itself but, so far as it is 
 mismanagement, demoralising to my accomplices. 
 
 Then, as to literary work, I do not, or perhaps / do, know 
 what you will say when I tell you that I am in the habit of 
 writing for a weekly newspaper, a clerical paper called the 
 ' Guardian,' in which I feel an interest, first because I had a 
 hand I may say was the principal hand in setting it up 
 in times of High Church distress ... I have once or twice 
 tried my hand at thinking or writing on somewhat larger 
 subjects. I began a parallel between the lives of John Mill 
 and Bishop Patteson. But when I had got a certain distance 
 with a view of Mill's personal history, I did not see what was 
 to become of it when I had done it, and so stopped short. 
 What I should have liked to have shown would have been 
 the different growth of two characters, each intrinsically 
 noble and thoroughgoing, but one having the advantage of a 
 family and a God, and the other not having those advantages. 
 If, when the occasion offered, I had any outlet for such a 
 composition, I think I should have finished it. 
 
 Also I turn in my mind, in a half minute, half desultory 
 way, fragments of thought intended to combine into a short 
 Religio Laid ' What do I believe and why ? ' But when I 
 look at a modern book I find that what has occurred to me 
 has occurred to others before me, and that, as I cannot make 
 myself learned, I shall not be able to open my mouth 
 without exposing my ignorance.
 
 360 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 In point of learning, my great difficulty is to find any- 
 thing which, when read aloud to save my eyes, or indeed when 
 read anyhow, will keep me awake. And this is really a more 
 serious difficulty than you would suppose in the way of a 
 person who would be glad to make himself capable of doing 
 anything. 
 
 There is a still further difficulty, as to reading aloud, in 
 finding what will keep both my wife and myself awake. The 
 heaviest articles which answer these purposes are, I think, the 
 lighter forms of history, and particularly French history, 
 to which, after useless excursions in other territory, we are 
 always recurring. 
 
 Well you have asked for egotism, and now you have 
 got it. I am sorry for you, but you should not have set the 
 stone rolling. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 To Dean Church. 
 
 Blachford : January 17, 1875. 
 
 So Gladstone goes: I am not sorry. His position was, 
 I should imagine, an intolerable kind of position, and I own 
 to a certain constant apprehension of what he would do 
 next. Is his retirement a step from or towards his adoption 
 of disestablishment ? 
 
 I suppose for the present he is full of something or some- 
 things or other. But will he not soon become dfeozuvrt and 
 take to prowling round the political pen, from which he has 
 excluded himself and snuffing for an entrance ? And when 
 he begins to snuff it will not be long before he makes a rush 
 an ugly one at the door. 
 
 I shall feel at liberty to feel malignant satisfaction if 
 Lowe and Harcourt and Co. mess matters in the House of 
 Commons. Hartington, Forster, Goschen, Harcourt, Low, 
 is there any one else who has the ghost of a pretension to 
 lead?
 
 1875 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 361 
 
 A 
 
 To Dean Church. 
 
 Blachford : February 8, 1875. 
 
 My dear Church, I enclose a letter from Newman which 
 will interest you. I told him that I did not quite know what 
 to make of his ' Schola Theologorum,' meaning in my heart 
 that it seemed to me that the Church seemed to say one thing, 
 ' Nulla salus extra ecclesiam ; ' and when in the course of things 
 this was found to be untenable, to invent a variety of modifi- 
 cations which constituted an unavowed abandonment of what 
 had been decreed, as if theologians were now to undercut the 
 Nicene Creed by a new definition of ova-la. 
 
 I told S. to send you my article on Manning. If you 
 object to anything, use your discretion. . . . 
 
 I wish you would come here. The foxhounds meet in 
 front of the house on Tuesday week (the i6th), and if you will 
 promise to wear your Dean's hat (I will spare the knee 
 breeches and silks) I will mount you on a little pony that will 
 jump nicely and scramble through the rocks like a cat. They 
 draw up the valley througn Combe Wood, so that with good 
 luck and in fair weather it is the prettiest sight possible. 
 
 What a curiously Whig leadership ! 7 Is it a first attempt 
 at a Middle party, a recovery of the old Liberal position 
 demolished for the time, by John Mill, Gladstone, and 
 Cobden ? 
 
 To Dean Church. 
 
 Blachford : April 5, 1875. 
 
 I have been engaged with Froude in a species of corre- 
 spondence which has elicited from me a paper on Huxley's 
 ' Automatism of Animals,' which again has led me to begin 
 Carpenter on Mental Philosophy, which is about the most 
 interesting book I ever read, and one reads with a certain 
 repose as he is a distinct Theist. It is a satisfaction to have a 
 really thorough treatise on the quasi-spiritual functions of the 
 nerves, with a distinct religion and belief in free will at the 
 bottom of it. 
 
 7 Mr. Gladstone announced his re- Hartington was chosen as leader of the 
 tirement from the leadership of the party on February 3. 
 Liberal party on January 13. Lord
 
 362 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 To Dean Church. 
 
 Blachford : April 24, 1875. 
 
 I remember discussing you with a select Committee, 
 Gladstone, Manning, Hope, Rogers, as a contributor, with 
 James Mozley, to William Palmer's quarterly (I forget its 
 name) H in succession to the ' British Critic.' It was a dinner at 
 Gladstone's, I think, brought together for the purpose of coming 
 to some conclusions as to the then intended periodical, and I 
 told him that I was sure Mozley would soon break away from 
 Palmer. Manning represented the safe and plausible interest, 
 rather afraid (if I remember right) of people going too far. 
 
 I wish I could live to see a fight between Church and 
 State represented by Manning as Pope and Gladstone as 
 English Prime Minister. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 R 
 
 To Dean Church. 
 
 Blachford :. May 27, 1875. 
 
 My dear Church, I doubt whether I quite go along with 
 you about the Irish business. 
 
 Nor do I quite agree about the ' compromise ' of 1662. I 
 should have supposed it not so much a compromise as an 
 imposition of terms by a victorious party. And I should say 
 that the High Church movement was such an upset of the 
 status quo (or what may be called practical compromise of 
 the eighteenth century) that it hardly lay in our mouths to 
 appeal to a pacification 200 years old, I mean as against the 
 acts of a lawful authority, or in curtailment of the liberty of 
 such an authority. 
 
 8 Apparently, the Christian Remem- the editor of the Christian Remem- 
 brancer. In the autumn of 1844 it was brancer. 
 
 started as a quarterly (having been a 9 The Act of Uniformity, enforcing 
 
 monthly magazine before) to take the for all who held livings Episcopal ordi- 
 
 place of the British Critic, which, under nation, acceptance of the Prayer Book, 
 
 Mr. Ward's direction, was considered to and abjuration of the Covenant ; upon 
 
 be Romanising, or anti-Anglican, in which about 2,000 ministers resigned 
 
 tone (see Church's Oxford Movement, their livings 
 pp. 322, 348). James Mozley became
 
 1875 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 363 
 
 My leading feeling is that our principal danger now is 
 touchiness all round, and the great duty of such a paper as 
 the ' Guardian ' is to write it down if possible, more among 
 those whom it can influence (of course) than among those 
 whom it cannot ; and in the hope that reasonableness, like 
 unreasonableness, may be catching. 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Blachford : June 19, 1875. 
 
 / think one great use of a newspaper is to abuse your 
 readers. If they take you in, it is to read you, and because 
 they rely on you. So you are in a favourable state to amend 
 them no doubt primd facie at some loss of circulation but 
 with effect. 
 
 Also what I have set myself often to .do as a press writer 
 is to stein manias. It is an amusing process from the first 
 delicate suggestion of a doubt, founded skilfully on one occa- 
 sion, when you can go, generally, with the stream, to the free 
 denunciation on which you can venture when you think you 
 have worked your readers up to it. 
 
 To Rev. J. H. Newman. 
 
 Blachford: October 28, 1875. 
 
 My dear Newman, Nothing could, it appears to me, be 
 possibly better than what you have written about Keble. 
 Turn it how I will, it seems excellent in everyway. 1 It brings 
 out most admirably the picture of his excellences, parrying 
 the depreciatory remarks that a certain class of people would 
 be inclined to make. I can quite believe what you say as to 
 the trouble which it cost you. It does not, however, show in 
 the way of awkwardness or effort. 
 
 I think I shall send you my production, though it is 
 really not worth sending. I should like to know what you 
 
 1 A short preface to a volume of ' whether as a whole, and next in 
 
 Keble's Essays. Cardinal Newman had separate parts, it wil answe itspurpose 
 
 on October 26 sent to Lord Blachford or whether I shall pluck it. 
 what he -had written, asking him to say
 
 364 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 thought of it. Paget (Sir James), to whom I showed it in 
 MS., says, ' I am afraid there is an answer.' 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Blachford : December 28, 1875. 
 
 My dear Taylor, I think that all that you send me of 
 your autobiography is excellent. And I do not know why 
 you should tell me to ' make what I can of it.' . . . Certainly 
 country life has a tendency to the vegetative. When I try to 
 think of something to say, I cannot think of anything but that 
 I am in the middle of building a greenhouse, and have suc- 
 ceeded (I hope), after struggles inexpressible, in buying a pair 
 of carriage horses. Also I have (for the first time) attended 
 a local board of magistrates, and ascertained that the stones of 
 which our roads are made should pass through a ring of two 
 and a half inches in diameter also an agricultural dinner 
 very dull about fat cattle also a charity meeting as bad 
 as a debate in the House of Lords or Commons. 
 
 What do you know of, or think about, Lord Carnarvon's 
 Cape of Good Hope agitation ? It seems to me (as to the 
 Cape people) that the Froude mission was an error, both as 
 to the thing and as to the man. 2 
 
 I wonder Herbert, with his Australian experience, agreed 
 to it. And Froude was not the kind of man (I should think) 
 to make it go down a man who would take up a view and 
 work it, not with reference to truth or practical success, but 
 with reference to scenic effect. No doubt he is a very clever 
 
 * fellow, and when he has got a truth he makes it tell. But I 
 cannot imagine a more unpersuasive person judging from his 
 
 * books and a long-ago recollection of his person. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 2 Lord Carnarvon (as Colonial Secre- of South Africa. Mr. J. A. Froude 
 tary) was trying to effect a Confederation (the historian) was sent out to negotiate.
 
 1875 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 365 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor, 
 
 London : December 9, 1875. 
 
 What a curious affair this Suez Canal business is ! 3 I like 
 it (with the rest of the world), buT I -am rather horrified at the 
 generality of our acquisitiveness just now. Here we have 
 Suez with Egypt in the distance Perak with Siam in the 
 distance Fiji with Oceania in the distance, and Ashanti 
 with Central Africa in the distance. The defence of the whole 
 to rest on the one or two hundred thousand men whom we 
 can scratch together in this highly-paid country or on 
 foreign mercenaries. 
 
 Blachford : December 28, 1875. 
 
 My dear Church, We are making up our London plans 
 after a new fashion. ... So we shall not what shall I call 
 it? trespass on your hospitality. I shall from time to time 
 regret my deanery quarters, but the arrangement somehow 
 comes naturally. And it has the advantage of throwing my 
 country time into the pleasantest part of the year ; rhododen- 
 drons, strawberries, and all sorts of good things lend themselves 
 to it. ... Lord Carnarvon has, it seems to me, dropped into a 
 scrape in South Africa. His Natal policy is (I am sure) 
 essentially unsound, except as a transitional state. He meant 
 it as a transition to Confederation. But Confederation is fail- 
 ing him. And he remains with an unworkable constitution 
 on his hands, which he might have altered with a high hand 
 a year ago, but now can only alter by Act of Parliament 
 
 This reminds me to ask you to tell your servant (as he 
 has done before) to pack up my parliamentary papers and to 
 send them here to me. I ask it because it is on the cards 
 that I might be expected to say something about colonial 
 affairs early in the session, and at any rate ought not to be 
 unable to talk about them. 
 
 3 The shares in the Suez Canal held by the Khedive were purchased by 
 England in November 1875.
 
 366 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 What could the Duke of Cambridge mean by blurting out 
 what was understood as a warning of possible war ? Certainly 
 the Turkish question is cropping up in earnest. How oddly 
 the Pope and the Turk, Rome and Constantinople seem to 
 run abreast ! Both, in one sense, on their last legs, but yet 
 Mahometanism and Roman Catholicism, one in Europe, the 
 other in Africa, are showing great vitality independent of their 
 centres, or at least of the present temporal condition of their 
 centres. 
 
 I am delighted with Asa Gray (on Botany). It is exactly 
 what I wanted. I shall soon have finished the outlines, and 
 shall then fly at the growth and behaviour. I did not con- 
 ceive that I could have read so much terminology by any 
 effort of perseverance. But it is so lightened by rationales, 
 and so absolutely devoid of ' padding,' and so clear in language 
 and arrangement that I never feel ^vearied, only tired by it. 
 
 To Dean Church. 
 
 Killerton, Exeter: January 26, 1876. 
 
 My dear Church, Your letter reached me yesterday 
 morning just in time, for at dinner I met Cook 4 here (who, by 
 the way, considers you the best English writer of the day), 
 and I had a long talk with him. 
 
 I do not doubt that if I were you I should sign, because 
 I do not doubt that you have ground for thinking and saying, 
 what I take for granted, partly because I wish to do so, that 
 the ' agreement ' at Bonn about the word filioque was a 
 ' happy ' one. 5 
 
 4 Dr. Cook, Canon of Exeter, and articles of agreement were drawn up re- 
 editor of the Speakers Commentary on garding the doctrine of the Procession 
 the Bible. of the Holy Ghost, that being one of the 
 
 & There were two Conferences at questions which had divided the Eastern 
 
 Bonn, in 1873 and 1874, arranged by and Western Churches. From the 
 
 the ' Old Catholics ' of Germany, whose Eastern Church, Archbishop Lycurgus 
 
 leader was Dr. von Dollinger, in corre- of Syros took an active part in the Con- 
 
 spondence with some prominent mem- ference. Bishop Wordsworth in Con- 
 
 bers of the Anglican Church, chief vocation commended to the sympathies 
 
 among whom were Bishop Christopher of the Anglican Church the cause of 
 
 Wordsworth and Bishop I larold Browne. intercommunion with Old Catholics and 
 
 At the second of these Conferences six with the Eastern Church.
 
 1876 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 367 
 
 But I dislike the whole system of getting a number of 
 signatures of mere well-wishers to manifestoes, or testimonials 
 or projects, on which the ' signatories ' are really not entitled 
 to pronounce, on the notion that the number of the names or 
 their general eminence are to supply the place of appropriate 
 knowledge. So I am disposed still to hold aloof, as I do from 
 most things. However, we shall soon be able to talk of that 
 and other things. 
 
 I am, or rather was, staying a couple of days here with 
 Acland (who is, of course, full of everything in particular), and 
 shall then work our way via Odcombe and Bournemouth to 
 the opening of Parliament (for which I have to recover my 
 robes, as the Queen opens in person). 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 London : February 19, 1876. 
 
 My dear Taylor, If you ' do not know anything about 
 it ' without my speech, you are not likely to learn much from 
 the ' Times,' and still less from any other report. 6 I en- 
 deavoured to show at length that the deadly nature of the 
 climate, which made it impossible to send civil officers there 
 except on the understanding that if they showed capacity 
 they should be removed before they knew their business, and 
 which made it impossible to send white soldiers or sailors there 
 at all, rendered it impossible to perform our obligations to 
 any subjects there, and therefore made the notion of extend- 
 ing our dominion absurd and disastrous. Hence it was de- 
 sirable to consolidate by abandoning our outlying districts. 
 Then follows the rest of the speech. The ' Times ' did not 
 report it exactly, but did not (as in the former part) make it 
 the absolute reverse of what I said. Whether it was good or 
 bad I do not know. 
 
 I have been spending pleasantly a day and the adjacent 
 nights at Blackmoor Selborne's a handsome modern Gothic 
 house that he has built the other side of Godalming on the 
 
 6 The debate in the House of Lords in West Africa, involving the cession of 
 was about certain territorial exchanges Gambia to France.
 
 3 68 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 edge of Hampshire and Surrey, with farms behind him, and 
 heaths and woods and blue distances before : a very attrac- 
 tive place, and becoming more so every year as his planta- 
 tions grow up. In making his garden he has dug up some 
 old vases containing some 30,000 Roman coins, of base 
 metal, of the half-century preceding Constantine, which he 
 is engaged in sorting very energetically. Many of them, as 
 coins of British usurpers, are curious as showing the degree 
 of art which the Romans had carried with them as far as 
 Britain. 
 
 As to my ' place in the House of Lords,' that is visionary. 
 I am too old to make it worth while to spend years in 
 making a Parliamentary position, even if I am not too old 
 to be able to do it. I do not see my way to do anything but 
 a set speech and most disagreeable it is to do that. 
 
 I find, partly I suppose from the habit of trying to write 
 tersely, that if I cannot get the expression which I think 
 best, I cannot get any ; and that when I have got the 
 expression which I think best I cannot get any other. And 
 one consequence of this is that I cannot emphasise (by 
 oratorical repetition) the joints or links or keys of the 
 argument. And I should think that a hearer, from failing to 
 have these critical points enforced, would sometimes feel that 
 I was presenting him with premisses and leaving him to draw 
 for himself the desired conclusions a process which Bishop 
 Butler recommended as a mode of compelling readers to 
 think. 
 
 I am glad to have spoken because I certainly obtained 
 some agreement ; and among the speakers I stood alone in 
 an outspoken advocacy of abandonment. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 London : March 14, 1876. 
 
 I have established a place for myself in the House, in the 
 centre of a group (i) Lord Rosebery, with whom I have 
 contracted something of an alliance, clever, amusing, but not 
 thinking small beer of himself or great beer of others. I
 
 1876 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 369 
 
 think I told you that he touched a suspicion in my mind, 
 while C - was speaking, by leaning over to me and 
 saying contemplatively, ' I think that, with a little encourage- 
 ment, C might become a bore.' I had talked with him 
 
 about Heligoland, and of course a speech of whatever kind 
 gave importance to his motion. . . . 
 
 Last night we had a very good debate, good down-right 
 cut and thrust. Lord Halifax was long and rather tedious, 
 but had a good deal to say. Then Lord Salisbury was good, 
 and seemed to make out his case pretty well, not without 
 letting drive at the enemy, and particularly Lord Halifax and 
 the Duke of Argyll, who was reddening and chafing under it 
 like an angry bantam. Perhaps the sight of this inspired one of 
 Lord Salisbury's expressions. He was describing the position 
 of a certain commission, which was being worried by the 
 Indian Government on one side and the Duke of Argyll on 
 the other, till at last ' they got tired of playing shuttlecock to 
 these two ferocious battledores,' &c. &c. The application 
 was so absurd that in our quarter we could call him (the 
 Duke) nothing but ' the ferocious battledore ' for the rest of 
 the debate. And certainly he jumped up and justified his 
 name. I have not often heard a better speech, but certainly 
 never one so aggressive. 
 
 On the whole there was a great deal of rubbish talked, in 
 the way of exaggeration of points of form and language. 
 But the Duke of Argyll seemed to me to be unanswered on the 
 substance of the matter, which amounted to this : ' Yes, Lord 
 Salisbury, Secretary of State for India, stumped it in Lanca- 
 shire and won golden opinions in Manchester by promising, 
 without consultation with the Indian Government, to repeal 
 an import duty on Manchester cottons. Then you find that 
 the Indian Government think, and are right in thinking, 
 that this repeal is not for the interests of India, and, in- 
 stead of yielding, you try to force the repeal down their 
 throats, and scold and bully them because, in the interests 
 which you and they are bound to consult, they turn your 
 flank.' 
 
 I think myself that if Lord S. had been right at bottom, 
 the scolding was not more than the Indian manoeuvres 
 
 B B
 
 370 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 deserved. But a harsh scolding when you are at bottom 
 wrong is a very different thing from such a scolding when 
 you are in the right. 
 
 To Lady Blachford. 
 
 Blackheath : April 4, 1876. 
 
 The Monday's debate [on the Royal Titles Bill] was dull 
 enough ; the only sparkle was Lord Rosebery's, who fired off 
 an amusing speech, which kept the House alive. He is 
 evidently a great favourite, because everybody knows that he 
 will amuse them. One of his jokes went off at half-cock. The 
 great point, as you know, is that 'Empress' is to be used in 
 India but not in England. He talked of it as for 'external 
 \ application,' and then said it reminded him of the rows of 
 chemists' bottles which are labelled to be applied externally 
 but are poison if taken within. But the House caught at 
 once the words ' external application ' and so spoilt the effect 
 of his sentence by cheering and laughing too soon. Selborne 
 was effective, and so was Cairns, but the rest were dull ex- 
 ceedingly. The Opposition were on the whole, I think, well 
 pleased with their minority (91) and cheered as lustily as 
 Government. 
 
 To Dean Church. 
 
 Blachford : May 12, 1876. 
 
 How would an article compounded of your letter and mine 
 on the Burial question do for the ' Guardian ' next week ? 
 
 I personally think that your argument is an imaginative 
 one. Logically my answer would be that instalments of justice 
 are no doubt frequently inefficacious Corn Laws, Irish Dis- 
 establishment, Slavery, and so on. But I think that you are 
 more likely to keep your hold on rights which are on all 
 grounds defensible, if you give up what, though your due in 
 point of technical justice, cannot be defended on its own moral 
 merits. 
 
 As a matter of impression it seems to me that the argument 
 from dissenting disorderliness is one of those which in practice 
 will not be found to have a substantial existence. This was
 
 1876 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 371 
 
 rather ' borne in ' upon me in thinking over what I had myself 
 written the other way. However, this kind of impression goes 
 for little, and, to those who have it not, for nothing. 
 
 Setting imagination against imagination I say this : sup- 
 pose that Lord Granville, commanding the present assent of 
 the Liberal party, is now speaking to Selborne thus. I will try 
 first to lay down a basis of settlement on the principle of 
 security. If I can combine upon that basis you and your 
 friends, and all but the extravagant dissenters, well and good. 
 But if I fail with my combination, we must go in next time for 
 the pure article, with all the force, whatever it may be, of the 
 Liberal party. 
 
 Is it not generally held that Reform might have been 
 staved off (for good or evil) for years and years if the Duke 
 of Wellington would have given up East Retford and Old 
 Sarum ? 
 
 To Dean Church. 
 
 Blachford : May 15, 1876. 
 
 As to ' imaginary,' I do not think I did justice to my mean- 
 ing. Practical considerations are logical or they are impres- 
 sional. The latter are perhaps the most valuable. In the 
 dissenters' case, I imagine the case of the dissenters making 
 themselves disagreeable, and I also imagine the case of their 
 not doing so. And I set one against the other ; and, I do not 
 know why, one or the other at length strikes me as being the 
 real thing, and the other not. I can give no reason : I can 
 only say that to me one has got to feel more real than the 
 other. 
 
 And I have so no answer to the counter case except to 
 call it ' imaginary.' When I said that your objection seemed 
 to me ' imaginary', I did not mean that that settled the ques- 
 tion ; but rather to express my state of mind. On the contrary, 
 to call it ' imaginary ' only says that I have no logical answer 
 to it, only an adverse impression. Good-bye. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD.
 
 37 2 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 To Dean Church. 
 
 Blachford : June 8, 1876. 
 
 I am glad the flowers arrived safe. I think I can hardly 
 have been here before exactly at this season, the hedge flowers 
 seem to me so beautiful. Sometimes it is quite a tricolor of 
 stitchwort, bluebells, and campion, sometimes a blaze of one 
 or the other. Now and then a whole hedge side is covered 
 with Geranium lucidum or Herb Robert : and on the moor 
 (or as I am sorry to say in some fields) we have a regular 
 extensive carpet of Pedicularis ; orchises only occasional. 
 
 By the bye, are you coming to me for the Church Congress ? 
 Moberly, as you know, half accepts, so far that he will be a 
 shabby dog if he fails me without a good excuse. (At his 
 age really not liking it is one.) Keep him stirred up if you can. 
 If he comes here on plea of going to Congress, he is still not 
 bound to attend unless he likes. 
 
 If there is a chance of you, I shall keep places for as many 
 as you like to bring, and that will best please me. But if 
 there is no chance of you (early in October) that is, if you 
 prefer another time (for I take the visit for granted) then I 
 should look about elsewhere. 
 
 I am (as I think I told you) at work on Mill, and very hard 
 work I find it. The subject works into ' The fundamental 
 blot of Benthamism illustrated by the mental history of J. S. 
 Mill.' I am afraid it is getting too long, and I am rather in 
 distress for a judgment on it I am afraid I shall have to 
 trouble you with it. 
 
 I am writing in a tumult, the deer almost jumping in at 
 the window to get beans (of which I think a sack must have 
 been consumed in the last week), and a small pug-nosed 
 spaniel with his legs a-kimbo, very like (excuse me) Canon 
 
 , barking at them. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 To Lady Blachford. 
 
 London : July 5, 1876. 
 
 Last evening there was rather an amusing ' episode,' as 
 people call it, about the Domesday Book. Lord Bel more
 
 1876 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 373 
 
 wanted the Irish part corrected ; then up got Selborne and 
 said that in his neighbourhood the mistakes were absurd ; 
 then Lord Granville to say that he was misrepresented ; then 
 Lord Salisbury said so was he ; then I put in my oar and said 
 so was I. I wish I had thought of proposing that the Lord 
 Chancellor should put it from the woolsack that ' Those who 
 are properly reported in the Domesday Book should say 
 " Aye," and those who are improperly reported should say 
 a No," adding that it seemed that the " Noes " have it.' 
 
 To Dean Church. 
 
 I had heard of Hope Scott's dangerous, or I suppose hope- 
 less, state, also of John Mozley's death. They are among the 
 things which make one feel one's own time short. Till you 
 are about 60, the deaths of your contemporaries seem prema- 
 ture and exceptional ; now they have a Iiodie inihi character. 
 
 We have had the Walters here for a series of stormy days 
 borne by us all with a cheerfulness almost heroic. He was 
 like old times, almost divesting himself of Jupiter, which really 
 does not suit him. And she is most singularly pleasant ; I 
 never was so much struck before at the way in which a country 
 house brings a person out. I had always liked her rather 
 particularly ; but, living in the same house, one finds a bright, 
 apprehensive, inquiring, and very well informed mind, which 
 makes the old outside quite like a shell. Love to all your 
 belongings. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 To Dean Church. 
 
 December 16, 1876. 
 
 Certainly there is an inconceivable amount of Turkish 
 feeling abroad. W. Froude professes himself a Pall- Mai lite. 
 
 I suspect that whatever the blockheads or mere partisans 
 may do or think, the men who furnish brains for both parties 
 are gravitating towards real autonomy. What is being written 
 must have its effect. The great facts of the case clear out, 
 and men of real thought learn to neglect what is irrelevant. 
 
 It is only gradually that we are getting to know our own
 
 374 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 case. Till lately it has been mainly instinct. But with 
 Dentori and Campbell, and Barkley and Evans, we are getting 
 able to prt-ciser our ground, which I take to be the poisonous 
 incapacity for good government, not of Mahommedans in the 
 abstract, nor of Turkish races in the abstract, but of the 
 Constantinopolitan government, and of those of whom any 
 Constantinopolitan government must be composed. 
 I believe it to be a case of magna est veritas. 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 To Dean Church. 
 
 Blachford : January I, 1877. 
 
 Can Dizzy pull us into a war ? I hope not. But I feel 
 towards them as I used to feel towards colonial authorities 
 who, being in contact with natives, could manipulate the 
 relations so as to compel the natives to compel the home 
 authorities to fight. My real fear is just now that the 
 Russians will look after their own interests in Armenia and 
 the Bosphorus and then give a mere illusory protection to the 
 Bulgarians. 
 
 To Right Hon. W. E. Gladstone. 
 
 Blachford, Ivybridge : January II, 1877. 
 
 My dear Gladstone, I do not like troubling you with 
 divergences actual or possible when you have so much on 
 your mind, and, in regard to the great question which presses, 
 are doing such splendid services to this and all other 
 Christian countries. 
 
 But I think, all things considered, I ought to tell you that 
 I feel these Birmingham meetings as a shake to my politics. 
 Of course it often happens that what looks formidable blows 
 over, and my feeling of something like alarm at the great 
 organisation of which Birmingham and Mr. Chamberlain are 
 the centre may be dissipated by events. But I feel more 
 strongly the opposite possibility that this rising power may 
 take a place in politics which may force me to reconsider a 
 good deal ; and, feeling this, I think myself bound to tell you 
 so. Meantime do not trouble yourself to answer this letter.
 
 1877 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 375 
 
 which is only the expression of an indefinite apprehension, to 
 which no answer is required, or indeed possible. 
 
 Yours very sincerely, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 To Dean Church. 
 
 January 12, 1877. 
 
 My dear Church, I think I agree with your letter entirely. 7 
 I think it an immense difficulty to say what the Church is to 
 accept. And I wish wise men would think it over and give 
 us some guiding principles. At present my prevailing feeling 
 is that this question should not be settled in a passion by a 
 set of second-rate people who are really fighting the battle 
 of (as it seems to me) their own perversities. 
 
 Moreover I am anxious that the Anti-Establishment 
 party should not be allowed to play off the errors of the 
 Ritualists for purposes of disruption. I cannot help feeling 
 that that is our side of the present movement. 
 
 The possibility of such tactics is immensely increased by 
 the multitude of small incumbencies not state paid, occupied 
 by men who hang loose on the existing state of things, and, 
 not having a great deal to gain or lose, ' like their play (like 
 somebody's geese) better than their food.' They are an ele- 
 ment, as the case may be, of strength or confusion. 
 
 Turning to a very different matter, I am beginning to set 
 to work on my Roman scraps of marble and shall soon plunge, 
 I hope, into combinations of colours. I wish we could 
 experimentalise together. But the time for that is not yet 
 come. 
 
 To Dean Church. 
 
 January , 1877. 
 
 My dear Church, So the Conference is over. 8 It seems 
 to me more and more like the end of the Turks. I cannot 
 
 7 The letter is printed in Dean rejection by the Turkish Government 
 Church's Life and Letters, p. 252. of the reforms proposed by the Euro- 
 It related to the prosecution of Mr. pean Powers, which had been gradually 
 Tooth, and to the action of the Law reduced to two demands, an Inter- 
 Courts in ritualistic cases. national Commission, but without exe- 
 
 8 The Conference at Constantinople cutive powers, and the appointment of 
 opened on December 23, 1875, an d Valis approved by the European 
 closed on January 20, 1876, with the Powers.
 
 376 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 see now how Europe can interfere to save them, or how they 
 can save themselves from Russia. However, the whole thing 
 is so strange in its later stages that I expect something 
 unexpected. 
 
 What sets me speculating is IgnatierFs moderation. I 
 cannot imagine that he would have so completely or so nearly 
 caved in, if he had not been confident that Turkey would 
 accept nothing. I could quite imagine that Russia had set 
 afloat the rumour about their own unpreparedness in order to 
 lure the Turks on to their ruin. I dare say they will fight, 
 but I can scarcely fancy them permanently holding their 
 own. 
 
 How are they to feed and pay their troops ? You see 
 Midhat tells them that they must get their ammunition from 
 America. Has this anything to do with the Russian squadrons 
 going there ? or is it merely to get out of the way of Hobart ? 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Odcombe Rectory : February 5, 1877. 
 
 My dear Taylor, Perhaps you have seen an elaborate 
 article of J. A. Froude's in the ' Quarterly ' on S. African policy. 
 
 It is an attempt, attractively written, to show that our 
 policy to the Boers has been one from the beginning of 
 ' neglect and disdain ' and blundering, culminating in the 
 basest breach of faith on the part of Lords Granville and 
 Kimberley. 
 
 Reeve has written to me to ask me to answer it in the 
 ' Edinburgh,' which I consider myself bound to do. 9 
 
 With regard to the climax (regarding the annexation of 
 Basutoland and the diamond fields), I know where to go for 
 information : and if I cannot take care of myself and the 
 C. O., I can blame no one but myself. 
 
 But it is not so with the early history. I do not at all 
 know either what the facts are or where to find them. I 
 shall probably have to deal lightly with that part of the 
 subject. But it occurs to me that you must have had at times 
 
 9 The article (still worth reading), appeared in the April number of the 
 On Native Policy in South Africa,' Edinburgh, 1877 (vol. cxlv. p. 447).
 
 1877 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 377 
 
 something to say about it, and that you may be able to help 
 me without much trouble to yourself first by directing me 
 to some points or considerations which qualify or overthrow 
 Froude more or less signally, and secondly by referring me 
 to books or Parliamentary papers, in which I can get at the 
 truth without more labour than I have time for. 
 
 I am on my way to the opening of Parliament. I expect 
 a good deal of interest. This Turkish question is the first in 
 which I have felt a real interest for years. All the chief 
 political movements are to me either matters on which we 
 are all agreed in principle, and on which the details will just 
 work themselves into shape, in the hands of those who 
 handle them ; or else changes which are called for by the 
 growth of the world, and which sweep away things to which 
 I am personally more or less attached, though I see that they 
 have to be got out of the way with as little as possible of 
 distress and inconvenience. This Turkey question is one 
 on which I feel a clear faith and strong interest on the 
 merits. 
 
 I have been a good deal interested by a certain Mr. 
 Wallace's account of the Russian communes, and ask myself 
 whether the time will come when the world will look on in- 
 equality of fortune (then extinct) with the same undoubting 
 reprobation with which we now look on slavery. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 B, 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Blachford : April 2, 1877. 
 
 I did not, as you see, speak in the House of Lords on the 
 Eastern question, partly because, being occupied with my own 
 composition, I had not time to get it up in the way in which 
 a speaker should have done i.e. to read the big Blue Books. 
 You will say that the Eastern question was greater than the 
 South African. True : but the one could be done best, and had 
 to be done, by me ; and the other could be done far better by 
 lots of other people. I had nothing to say that others had 
 not. 
 
 There was some answer of the Duke of Wellington's to
 
 378 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 somebody who recommended him to take up some philan- 
 thropic object that ' F. M. &c. was one of the small number 
 of persons who minded their own business.' 
 
 A dilemma which occurs to me continually on subjects on 
 which I have no special qualification is this : Either I agree 
 with (other ?) people of eminence, in which case they will say 
 what I have to say ; or I do not, in which case I am pro- 
 bably wrong. However, the question is one on which, from 
 time to time, I idly imagine myself speaking. 
 
 And the South African question is also a big one. It is 
 capable of working up into the worst cluster of native wars 
 that we have yet had. 
 
 . . . Do you see the ' Nineteenth Century ' a secession 
 from the ' Contemporary' (the old case of the foreman setting 
 up shop against his master) ? There is a curious new inven- 
 tion in~it called the ' Modern Symposium,' a succession of 
 small papers on the same subject (the effect on morality of a 
 decline in religious belief) in the way of discussion. I read it 
 and was much struck by the weakness in thought of the re- 
 presentatives of unbelief (Frederic Harrison, Comtist, and 
 Clifford, materialist). They seem to me to think that a few 
 flippant or turgid words will do, instead of firm grasp of mind. 
 There is so much that is solid to be said against everything, and 
 among other things against Christianity, that they seem to 
 me quite unnecessarily loose and shallow. 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Blachford : April 13, 1877. 
 
 My dear Taylor, I have read your Autobiography, 
 Vol. 2, with even more interest than when I read it first 
 disjointedly. What strikes me still more than at first, when 
 I see it all together, is the variety of its interest : anecdote, 
 character, thought, sentiment, and idiosyncrasy the last, as it 
 ought to be in an autobiography, by no means the least. 
 There is something, excuse me for continuing to say, highly 
 amusing, not only in the thing revealed, but in the revelation, 
 in the composed manner in which you turn yourself upside 
 down and inside out, to your own, and therefore to your
 
 1877 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 379 
 
 readers', satisfaction, with occasional illuminations by flashes 
 of side-light from Lady Taylor and other of your friends. 
 
 ... I think I said how much I was struck and interested 
 by the letters from your mother-in-law, Miss Fenwick, and 
 Lady Taylor ; but there is no flagging in the worldly and 
 political matters from which they are absent, and I feel about 
 these as I remember an Oxford hairdresser saying to a friend 
 of mine about a lecture which, I think, Edward Denison 
 (afterwards of Salisbury) gave to the bourgeoisie about the 
 French Revolution. (No ! I beg his pardon. It was an im- 
 pudent fellow called , candidate for the representation of 
 
 Oxford town.) ' And then, sir, that was very pleasant, sir, 
 for those of us who had read about it, sir, because we liked to 
 be reminded, and it was very pleasant, sir, to those who had 
 not read about it, sir, because we liked to be told.' And so it 
 is very pleasant, sir, to be reminded of James Stephen, and 
 told about Lord Melbourne. 
 
 I do not feel satisfied with what I said to you about my- 
 self. It is a great pleasure to me that you should form a 
 high estimate of me ; but I feel a touch of unmeant irony in 
 the amount of it, .and I should feel the pleasure more if 
 the evidences of kind partiality were a little less overpower- 
 ing. 
 
 So war is upon us I mean on Europe. It is of course a 
 terrible thing, perhaps unusually terrible. But it comes, as it 
 seems to me, like a necessary surgical operation, only avoid- 
 able under conditions which (thanks, I fear, to this country) 
 cannot be fulfilled, or with enduring consequences worse than 
 war itself. All I hope now, though I am afraid that it is 
 hardly to be hoped, is that it may be so short, sharp, and 
 decisive as to give the Turks little time for exterminating the 
 Christians of Bulgaria. I never have been able to persuade 
 myself that there was any real alternative between foreign 
 occupation and carte blanche for the Turks. And so the 
 sooner Russia is in possession of Bulgaria, and Austria of 
 Bosnia, the better I shall be pleased. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD.
 
 380 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Blachford : May 28, 1877. 
 
 I do not know what to think about Carnarvon's annexa- 
 tion. 1 My own impression would have beerncThave allowed 
 the Boers to drink rather more deeply of the cup which they 
 have mixed for themselves, strengthening the Natal garrison 
 to meet any native attack on Englishmen, but keeping back 
 till we were almost physically forced into interference for the 
 preservation of Englishmen. 
 
 I think I would have told the Dutch that if they would not 
 become English subjects we would not defend them ; and I 
 would have told the English in Dutch territory gold-diggers 
 and others that England was in no degree responsible for 
 their safety while they remained outside our frontier. And 
 then I would have strengthened myself and waited. But this 
 is mere guesswork, and I dare say Carnarvon may be able to 
 show good reasons for what Shepstone has done, and what, I 
 assume, he will approve. 
 
 I think it very likely that our resolute indisposition to 
 annex up to 1871 was incapable of being maintained, and 
 that we had run up a kind of arrear of necessity in that way. 
 But I still look with a certain distrust on our accessions of 
 responsibility in West Africa, Fiji, the Straits, and South 
 Africa. 
 
 I am deep in mud just now. We are clearing out some 
 feet of sand, dead leaves, and other dirt from the bottom of 
 our pond, and constructing an island, to be hereafter covered, 
 I think, with rhododendrons, hydrangeas, azaleas, and such like 
 things. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 1 The annexation of the Transvaal 12, 1877, by Sir T. Shepstone, who 
 
 Republic, then in financial difficulties had at that time satisfied himself that 
 
 and seriously threatened by hostile the Boers wished to belong to the 
 
 native tribes, was proclaimed on April British Empire.
 
 1877 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 381 
 
 To Dean Church. 
 
 Blachford : May 6, 1877. 
 
 My dear Church, I have told Sharp to send you a 
 proof of a review of ' Darwiniana ' [by Dr. Asa Gray]. It 
 is a difficult book to review, being so much of it review 
 itself in one case a review of a review. I should like to have 
 brought out some of the scientific part, particularly the essay 
 on the Sequoia, which is, I understand, original and very 
 interesting and curious indeed. But you pointed my atten- 
 tion to the Natural Theology, and I found I had enough to 
 do with that, especially now that the ' Guardian ' seems pretty 
 well crowded. Dr. Gray is very difficult to quote. Thoughts 
 and phrases, which are just and telling, are bound up with 
 passages which cannot be taken in without scientific know- 
 ledge or a clear recollection of what has gone before, and so 
 cannot be quoted effectively without explanations which 
 would altogether dilute the effect. However, you will see 
 what I have done. To me the book is hard reading from 
 my want of familiarity with the lines of scientific theory. 
 
 I get more and more astonished at the absence of reason- 
 ing power which some of these scientific atheists display, and 
 also somewhat satisfied. 
 
 71? Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Blachford : October 26, 1877. 
 
 My dear Taylor, Thank you for your praise : which I 
 need hardly say is very grateful. I think that the notion of 
 Empire is really gaining ground, and that as political people 
 like Lord Kimberley do not like to take up a ground against 
 it which is unpopular, and gives opponents an advantage at 
 the hustings, it is likely to establish itself in John Bull's mind 
 as a principle of policy, unless somebody or other can get a 
 hearing on the other side. And it appeared to me that an 
 old official who had nothing to hope or fear was the kind of 
 animal that might be expected to bray aloud on the subject. 
 
 I have had one or two notices from friends on what I have 
 written ; and it strikes me rather painfully that while they
 
 382 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 compliment me on my clearness, they make some observation 
 or other which shows that I have totally failed to make them 
 grasp what I suppose to be my argument. I console myself 
 by supposing that I serve them in the same way when they 
 write, and recollect Bishop Butler's sentence ' By this 
 means ' (idle way of reading) ' time even in solitude is happily 
 got rid of without the pain of attention ; neither is any part 
 of it more put down to idleness one can scarce forbear say- 
 ing, is spent with less thought than great part of that which 
 is spent in reading.' 
 
 I enclose an effort at historical writing which may amuse 
 you, and which may be read without labour (this runs as if I 
 intended to charge you with inattentive reading, which was 
 the last thing in my mind). I have sent it to the ' Guardian.' 
 
 I wish you would have come here for the beautiful weather 
 we have just parted with. My rheumatic sprain, which still 
 confines me to easy walking on tolerably level ground, would 
 have made us appropriate company for each other, so that we 
 could have buzzed up and down our mile of flat road like two 
 old bluebottles in the sun, and, when we went in, dozed in 
 front of the fire to our respective benefits. 
 
 Our autumn is not a very fine specimen of its kind. The 
 beech-leaves fall and wither, a dead brown instead of the 
 beautiful scarlet of which they are capable ; and the hurricane 
 of last week bruised and knocked off the glory of the trees on 
 the side which it hit, besides mangling them and tearing their 
 heads off. 
 
 I am dawdling through Lady Minto's ' Sir Gilbert Elliot ; ' 
 it is an extremely pleasant lifelike picture of himself and his 
 friends. It is curious to be brought into such intimate contact 
 with the relations of political men, with so little contact with 
 political or historical events. Of course it is no defect in a 
 book that it does what it does, and does not do what it does 
 not pretend to do. But it produces an odd effect on the 
 reader's mind (unless he is very well instructed) like being 
 shortsighted, and only seeing six feet from your nose.
 
 1877 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 383 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Blachford : November 7, 1877. 
 
 I will send you my 'Edinburgh.' But as it is the only 
 copy I have of my production I should like to have it back 
 again. 
 
 What pleasant work the writing of history must be not 
 the ' indefatigable research ' which is called conscientious, 
 but the knitting together the characteristic and telling parts 
 of what the hewers of wood and drawers of water have edited, 
 or what forms the cream of personal memoirs. I never knew 
 the amusement of it till I tried my hand on these sketches. 
 I am now putting together a short sketch of the Florentine 
 aristocracy from the second book of Machiavelli, which is 
 very interesting to me. His cold balanced satire is almost as 
 amusing as de Retz's buoyant fun. But I think it is rather 
 demoralising to go on reading books in which you have 
 nobody and nothing to admire. 
 
 I agree with you in caring about individual fellow 
 creatures more than evolution of forces. But then the 
 creatures or their doings must be worth caring about. I 
 do not know whether or not to envy the power (which I do 
 not possess) of what people call ' caring about little things ' 
 memoranda of dinner parties, genealogies, and such like. 
 My wife is waiting for me, so good-bye. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 B. 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Blachford : November 19, 1877. 
 
 My dear Taylor, Thank you very much for Leti, which 
 has arrived. I have his ' Cardinalismo della Santa Chiesa,' 
 which lets you see the man, a vagrant litterateur, who is a 
 kind of unattached hanger about between Catholic and 
 Protestant, and collector of stories about Cardinals and 
 such like things if scandalous, so much the better but 
 certainly, as you say, lifelike and amusing beyond measure. 
 
 He seems to have been botn some forty years after 
 Sixtus' death, and must (unless he is a liar of singular
 
 384 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 genius) have got hold of some personal memoirs of the 
 Conclave. But then the translator professes to have recast 
 his work, which introduces a fresh element of doubt. I hear 
 that Ranke (' History of Popes ') mentions and gives a value 
 for him. I want to find out (and shall) what that value is, 
 and if it is enough to justify me, I shall certainly compile an 
 account of his election. 
 
 It is a wonderfully good myth at any rate. One sees 
 and hears the men, and there is such an exuberance of 
 characteristic stories. 2 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Blachford : November 21, 1877. 
 
 I am disappointed about Leti. I had adjusted in my head 
 a kind of historical sketch, which would have been, I think, 
 highly amusing and characteristic. In fact, all that is neces- 
 sary for such a sketch is a pair of scissors. But I found from 
 the Dean that Ranke had given an estimate of Leti's autho- 
 rity in his ' History of the Popes,' and I asked my brother, 
 who has the book, to see what Ranke said. 
 
 I enclose his account of the matter, and you will see that 
 after such a judgment by such a man I cannot very well 
 present his history as anything but a romance, in the matters 
 which are most racy and relevant. However, it is most 
 amusing reading, and I am very glad to have seen it viewed 
 as Roman gossip. 
 
 2 Leti in 1669 published a Life of at the time of the election, yet he inter- 
 
 Sixtiis V. The current anecdotes about polates the passage about the pretended 
 
 that Pope, some of them mythical, are bodily weakness of which the original 
 
 derived from this Life. Ranke's criti- says nothing : indeed, it speaks of Car- 
 
 cism is given in Appendix xlviii. to the dinal Montalto as full of life and health. 
 
 History of the Popes. He shows by As regards Leti's dealings with the MS. 
 
 several instances that Leti's biography life which he copied, he sums up : ' Leti 
 
 was not original, but a garbled copy of has not only omitted to examine his 
 
 an Italian MS., itself full of apocryphal MS. and to correct the errors in it, but 
 
 stories. In particular, the famous story to the best of his ability has rendered 
 
 of Sixtus throwing away his crutches it still more mendacious. Nevertheless 
 
 after his election is discredited. Leti his book went through edition after 
 
 is paraphrasing a ' conclave ' written edition, and was often translated.'
 
 1877 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 385 
 
 From the ' Cardinalismo,' written by him (Leti), he seems 
 to have been an inquisitive gentleman going everywhere, to 
 Protestant meetings, Jewish synagogues, and Turkish mosques 
 always asking questions and chattering with everybody he 
 met, subject to the apprehension that they may have been 
 spies, which however he soon forgot. Once or twice his 
 omni-voracity for small inquiry reminded me of Arthur 
 Stanley. 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 Killerton / December 6, 1877. 
 
 My dear Kate, Our proceedings here have been very 
 pleasant. Lord Portsmouth is genial and country-gentleman- 
 like, very clear-headed and shrewd, bearing in mind the duty 
 of having his eldest son returned sooner or later for the 
 county, and from that point of view snubbing Acland for his 
 farming politics economical talk of putting down deer. ' No, 
 no, don't do that. I find nothing so pacific as venison. He 
 is evidently immensely popular, and the cheering for him, 
 with a whole chorus of ' view holloas ' was almost like that for 
 Northcote. He only stayed one night and did not come back 
 after the banquet. 
 
 .... The dinner went off exceedingly well. 3 Nothing at 
 all jarring or unpleasant. Everybody here was plainly on 
 tenterhooks as to what Acland would say. Lord Portsmouth 
 was beseeching his wife, ancT his wife was beseeching Lord P. 
 to keep him prudent, and Lady Susan Fortescue was offering 
 to bet him that he would not keep his speech under ten 
 minutes, and he had, you will say, the good sense to rehearse 
 his speech to me as we were driving together to Exeter, 
 omitting, with great docility, various objectionable topics. So 
 the result was that he was quite a success, though plainly less 
 popular, as well he might be at a Conservative banquet, than 
 the other members. Northcote's speech was very good. The 
 first part particularly so. But before long he got to bunkum 
 about the city of Exeter, and Acland kept up grumbling to 
 me, hardly sotto 1'oce, 'Ah, now he's getting like himself;' 
 
 3 The occasion of the dinner was the Northcote. Members of both political I 
 presentation of a portrait to Sir S. partreg"fTa3 joined in the subscription. 
 
 C C
 
 386 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 till at last a reporter, who was doing his shorthand opposite to 
 us quite irrespective of party, burst out, ' I do wish you'd 
 hold your tongue, Sir Thomas.' Which he obediently did for 
 the rest of the speech. 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Killerton : December 7, 1877. 
 
 My dear Taylor, Thank you for all the enclosed. The 
 reviews have a great deal that is very good in them. I should 
 not have applied the epithet 'cold ' to ' Philip van Artevelde' 
 as a composition ; and it seems to me that the man who does 
 so has not some perception that I have. Stately and self- 
 controlled, if you like, and highly economical of gush. Sir 
 G. Clerk's praise is pleasing and his criticism of the French 
 amusing. 
 
 I read and was much affected by the Dean's sermon. 
 One's feeling towards such a composition wants an English 
 word to express it something that is not merely admiring 
 nor merely taking home, but a warm compound of the two. 
 
 I should think that Mackonochie was spoiling his own 
 game. I imagine that, though he is a very zealous man, he is 
 not a very wise one, and is open to the temptations of a man 
 not quite strong enough for a prominent position. 
 
 To Lord Selborne. 
 
 Blachford : February 7, 1878. 
 
 My dear Selborne, Thank you for taking the trouble to 
 keep me au courant. I had an uneasy feeling that the vote 
 of 6,ooo,ooo/. might be meant as a pledge to Austria that we 
 were, ready to join her, to the extent of war if necessary, in 
 controlling Russia. 4 But I was reassured by the vehemence 
 with which Cross & Co. denounced as calumnious the charge of 
 a war policy, and the way in which Lord Salisbury threw over 
 the old 'independence and integrity' TO'TTOS of Lord Beacons- 
 field which seemed like capitulation on Lord B.'s part. For 
 myself, it does not appear to me that Russia should be 
 
 4 The Government had, on Jan. 24, 6,ooo,ooo/. to increase the naval and 
 asked for a supplemental estimate of military strength of the country.
 
 1878 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 387 
 
 allowed to get the mouths of the Danube (which she wants), 
 or Constantinople (which she does not want) or the exclusive 
 passage of the Dardanelles, which is a barbarous kind of 
 arrangement. The more she takes in Armenia (to my mind) 
 the better. And the more Turkish provinces in Europe are 
 practically made independent the better. 
 
 I would go this length with Austria, that, subject to the 
 decision of a European Congress, I would oppose the transfer 
 of Roumanian Bessarabia w r ith her, if she would with us 
 oppose the exclusive passage of the Dardanelles by Russia, 
 and I would in general sacrifice something of the completeness 
 of provincial independence in Europe, in order to extend its 
 area to Thessaly and the islands (with substantial guarantees 
 of course) only taking care that the whole was placed on a 
 footing (as to physical force) which would develop forwards 
 to freedom, and not backwards to tyranny. 
 
 What is just now hideous to me is the general appre- 
 hension that everybody wants to fight everybody if only they 
 can get a convenient occasion. There is not a Power, except 
 ourselves, who does not appear to have a kind of growling 
 desire to be at somebody else. 
 
 This feeling of mine may be derived from reading the 
 ' Pall Mall Gazette,' which is always preaching that we ought 
 to go mad because Europe is becoming a military Bedlam. 
 
 I, on the other hand, hold fast by our two great advan- 
 tages, our seas and our sang-froid. 
 
 I am sometimes very indignant at the injustice which is 
 done to the Russians. A great deal that is said of their past, 
 and perhaps of their present, general conduct may be true, but 
 looking not to suspicions, but at proved facts, there is 
 nothing to show that this war is not on the whole an enor- 
 mous sacrifice for a noble object, and it is quite plain that 
 they have done their best to conduct it in a civilised way, 
 under the most tremendous provocations to savagery. 
 
 After all this, one hardly likes to pass to poor Coleridge's 
 loss. What a terrible blow ! and, I suppose, quite un- 
 expected. 
 
 Ever yours sincerely, 
 
 BLACHFORU 
 
 C C 2
 
 3 88 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 To Dean Church. 
 
 Blachford : May 28, 1878. 
 
 My dear Church, It is sometime since we heard of each 
 other, so I vent on you a certain sense of relief which comes 
 of having sent off the last corrected copy of my article. 5 The 
 less a man has to do, the more he thinks of the little 
 which he has. Reeve cut the historical part to shivers ! 
 observing that I had sent him two articles instead of one, and 
 that the least interesting of the two must be got rid of, or, as 
 he put it, that the review was in the case of a nursery in which 
 twins had made their appearance when preparations had only 
 been made for one baby. 
 
 Of course all this was done with great propriety (avec des 
 e"gards avec des e'gards), of which the result only was, that, 
 instead of drowning my baby at once, I had to tear it to 
 pieces with my own hands, and throw it away bit by bit. 
 Now he says that it is ' highly satisfactory, after all the trouble 
 you have had,' to find that it is quite what it ought to be ' in 
 length and matter ' a two-edged kind of consolation. How- 
 ever, it is done with 
 
 How tiresome all these reports about the [Berlin] Congress 
 are ! It seems to me that to attach importance to the miser- 
 able distinction between submitting 'the Treaty to the Congress 
 and communicating it is the most absurd thing that we have 
 yet seen ; remembering that, on the one hand, any Power 
 may raise in Congress any question relating to the Congress 
 (so that the submission gives no advantage to England), and 
 that no member of the Congress is bound by the majority (so 
 that the submission imposes no disadvantage on Russia). 
 
 To G. E. Marindin, Esq. 
 
 Blachford : May 15, 1878. 
 
 My dear Eden, Thank you for your letter. 6 I did not 
 intend to have given you the trouble of more than an acknow- 
 
 5 A review of May's Democracy in an article on Turkish affairs of which 
 the Edinburgh Review. Lord Blachford had sent a reprint. 
 
 6 The letter in question referred to
 
 1878 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 389 
 
 ledgment still less ought I to trouble you with reading 
 an answer. But sometimes one's fingers itch a little. 
 
 1. I dare say you are right in saying that there is a large 
 section which upholds war against the Turks as ' a crusade ' 
 the ' Pall Mall ' is always saying so. But I never myself hap- 
 pened to see any person in the flesh who advocated it or to 
 read any printed or written paper in which it was avowed or 
 could be inferred. 
 
 2. I dare say that the feelings of Russians are partly 
 crusading, partly Panslavist just as my feelings might be 
 partly sportsmanlike and partly domestic, if I shot a wolf 
 which was tearing to pieces my brother but the basis of my 
 action would be the desire to save a human being from a 
 savage brute. The English who felt strongly about Bul- 
 garian atrocities were neither Slav nor ' Orthodox.' 
 
 3. As you allow of a war for 'suffering humanity' you of 
 course do not agree with the passage of Mackintosh which you 
 quote (unless you explain it away) neither do I. 7 It seems 
 to me transparently rhetorical. It is plainly much more 
 wicked to attack on insufficient grounds a prosperous and 
 virtuous government than a corrupt and desolating one. In 
 one you injure the people, in the other only the rulers and 
 their armies, with (supposed) benefit to the people. It is 
 also plainly a subject of regret that a good government should 
 be destroyed, while it may be a subject of just and stern 
 rejoicing that, by whatever agency, a bad one should be 
 destroyed, and its subjects transferred to those by whom they 
 will be better used. 
 
 4. Of the past history of Russia I know next to nothing. 
 I only see with my eyes on maps the respective annexations 
 of England and Russia during the last century and a quarter, 
 and am astounded at the fact that England should assume 
 the position of accuser in this respect. 
 
 7 The passage is in Mackintosh's tion to mankind for the destruction of 
 
 Essay on the Partition of Poland : its independence. As .no government 
 
 ' There is no political doctrine more is without great faults, such a doctrine 
 
 false or more pernicious than that which multiplies the grounds of war, gives an 
 
 represents vices in its internal govern- unbounded scope to ambition, and fur- 
 
 ment as an extenuation of unjust aggres- nishes benevolent pretexts for every 
 
 sions against a country, and a consola- sort of rapine.'
 
 390 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 5. I am disposed to look leniently on our Minister's 
 omission to notice the hint about Bessarabia. So long as 
 independent Roumania lies between Turkey and Russia I 
 cannot see why 50 or 60 miles more or less of sea coast 
 should signify. Russia's crime (which is very disgusting) is 
 in taking it against the will of her ally, which did not appear 
 till the Treaty of S. Stefano (and perhaps does not now much 
 concern us ; unless we want a quarrel). 
 
 6. I agree with you in not confining the delinquencies of 
 England to a single act (the Berlin Memo.). I begin by 
 hating with my whole soul, what may be called our traditional 
 policy (avowed by Palmerston and Beaconsfield) of bolstering 
 up, for our own purposes, such a desolating and loathsome 
 oppression (I conceive these words to be chosen with 
 accuracy) as Turkey. Then I think it was our bounden duty 
 to retrieve the tremendous error of guaranteeing the ' inde- 
 pendence and integrity ' of such an oppressor as soon as 
 the Seraglio put itself in the wrong by not giving effect to 
 the provisions of the Hatti Humayun of the Treaty of 
 Paris. This duty arose probably very soon after the Treaty, 
 but may be said (by an apologist) to have escaped notice, in 
 so far as it merely appeared in reports and official documents. 
 It was allowed to slip out of sight. 
 
 But three years ago this duty forced itself upon our notice 
 by the Herzegovinian revolt, and the English Ministry 
 adopted a course of action by which they did not merely 
 neglect, but deliberately repudiated it, taking ' independence 
 and integrity ' as the key of their policy, not in one case or 
 another, but time after time. The Constantinopolitan con- 
 ference was an exceptional incident, almost avowedly forced 
 on the Government by the Bulgarian agitation made 
 abortive by parallel communications with Turkey and at 
 the close of which the Government (by the appointment of 
 Layard and other matters) have come back to what I should 
 call ' their vomit,' that is to say a course of obstructive special 
 pleading, hiding the reconstruction of what is intolerable, 
 under the phrase (which I see you adopt) 'the faith of 
 treaties.' I say this because it is too evident to be denied 
 that our present proceedings are such as to enable Turkey to
 
 1878 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 391 
 
 prepare for a fresh struggle, that in case of such a struggle 
 we have her as an ally, and that in case of such an alliance 
 we must necessarily repay the Sultan and his Ministers by 
 replacing them more or less in possession of the authority of 
 which Russia threatens to deprive them. 
 
 On the main point, I think the great difference between 
 us is that I am thoroughly impressed by the belief that 
 Turkey is incorrigible, while Russia is in process of improve- 
 ment. These things both of them -come to my mind with 
 the clearness of the sun. And the suggestion of allowing 
 Turkey a year for improvement appears to me like allowing 
 a notoriously bankrupt debtor a month's respite, during which 
 he will remove his goods, and at the end of which the 
 creditor (Russia) will have to recommence an expensive 
 litigation which, when the dilatory plea was urged, was on the 
 point of being brought to a hearing, sure to end in a success. 
 I should be very sorry to stand godfather to the motives of 
 Russian statesmen. I dare say they are as selfish as our own 
 profess to be. But they have this advantage that their 
 interests (so far as the liberation of the Turkish provinces go) 
 coincide with the interests of humanity with which our own 
 (alleged) interests conflict. And the result is that their 
 present position, as viewed in future history, is on the road to 
 grandeur ours on the road to meanness. 
 
 Of course all this would change if we became the liberators 
 and Russia the conqueror. But this does not yet appear. 
 
 Meantime I collect the difference between Turkish and 
 Russian misgovernments in esse and in posse to be such 
 that the most extensive transfer of Armenia from Turkey to 
 Russia would (except to the Kurdish robbers) be an enormous 
 blessing. And I think Russia has a clear right to expect 
 'compensation' (not 'extensive,' but such as she is now 
 proposing) from a vanquished enemy who cannot pay in 
 coin. 
 
 Surely you are wrong in supposing that the acquisition 
 of Bessarabia will give Russia access to Bulgaria. All 
 Wallachia lies between. 
 
 If the Russians had patronised the Thessalians should not 
 we have made It a fresh charge against them ? I think they
 
 392 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 may fairly say that, with England watching every step which 
 they took, they had quite enough on their hands. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 To Miss Rogers. 
 
 London : December 1878. 
 
 My dear Kate, As letters amuse you I enclose one 
 from Lord Portsmouth and one from H. Taylor. I think 
 I told you that Lord Fortescue's defection from the Liberals 
 was a matter of great speculation at Eggesford. The Duke 
 of Somerset, as you may see by the papers, made a sharp 
 speech against the amendment but did not vote. . . . We have 
 had a long debate, seven hours on Monday, and eleven on 
 Tuesday, but on Tuesday I took Spohr's ' Last Judgment ' in 
 a parenthesis at St. Paul's. It was most beautiful, but I 
 found that the parts which we used to sing came out like 
 jewels among the rest, which seemed, and perhaps were, 
 much inferior. The arrangement which made a kind of 
 service of it (I enclose the paper) was very good and gave a 
 really devotional character to the whole. The people who 
 were admitted without tickets (all comers, as on an ordinary 
 service) were about 7,000 and thoroughly well behaved. 
 
 The debates [on the Afghan War] were not generally 
 brilliant, but interesting and characteristic. Cranbrook 
 spirited and loud, but the bunkum rather overdone, Lord 
 Halifax (to me) inaudible, and I should think to the last 
 degree prosy. Lord Lawrence I thought interesting and in- 
 structive, but his very bad hesitating manner, his (not 
 unnecessary) egotism, and his aged look (he is not so old 
 as I am) gave an appearance of weakness, and the matter 
 itself was sometimes weighty, sometimes not. Lord Derby 
 cold and balancing, but often hitting the nail on the head, 
 the Duke of Somerset very amusing. The next day Lord 
 Grey (I should say) statesmanlike (them's my sentiments), 
 Lord Northbrook able, full of matter, but too detailed in 
 self-justification. . . . Dizzy was to me, for the first time, 
 thoroughly amusing. I have hitherto found him dull. But 
 this time he did some lifjht chaff in a manner which was
 
 1878 IN PARLIAMENT AND A-p" BLACK FORD 393 
 
 as good as a stage play. It gave me the idea of a man 
 who had a thorough contempt for" human nature in general 
 and his audience in particular, but still thought that some of 
 them might be worthy of the strain of amused and amusing 
 irony with which he addressed them. It is impossible to 
 appreciate it without hearing it. On paper it appears (in 
 parts at least) dry and unmeaning, particularly perhaps his 
 solemn enumeration of the various Treaties of Rectification 
 of Frontier which have been contracted of late, but when 
 you heard his tone of mock solemnity which seemed to 
 say ' I really believe the lot of you are fools enough to take 
 all this in earnest,' with a kind of stony twinkle in his marble 
 face, one could hardly believe that one was not at a comedy. 
 I was next to Lord Sydney and almost at the same moment 
 we ejaculated, I ' What a fellow it is ! ' he ' What a buffoon ! ' 
 But there was a kind of divine impudence about it, particu- 
 larly his treatment oT an interruption by Lord Grey, ' You 
 are impetuous,' and a sustained ironical chaff of Lord DefBy 
 which really almost inclined me to vote for him cofite que 
 cofite. But at the end of the speech he thought it necessary 
 to go off in bunkum, and that cured me completely. 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Blachford : February 26, i879. 8 
 
 My expression about being at war ' with everybody 
 everywhere ' was a rough and unjust one, as is sometimes the 
 case when one thing leads you to give vent to a pent-up 
 impatience about another. 
 
 What was in my mind was this : In Natal, in Afghanistan, 
 in Turkey we are always assuming at least there are a 
 quantity of people who assume that, because this or that 
 state or potentate is an inconvenience to us, making us keep 
 more troops or ships than we like, or unsettling trade, or 
 threatening the balance of power, that is at bottom a suffi- 
 cient reason for trying to disable them, and the only question 
 is one of waiting for a pretext. This I take it was the old 
 
 8 News of the disaster at Isandlwan* in the Zulu War reached London on 
 February n, 1879.
 
 394 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 theory of foreign policy, which I, for one, flattered myself 
 was exploded or nearly so, and it is one which, if carried out 
 to its full extent, would keep us engaged in disabling every- 
 body, the U.S. because they will evidently one day threaten 
 our naval supremacy, Prussia, Russia, France, with their great 
 armies and ambitious objects ; Italy and Greece with their 
 prospects with regard to Mediterranean trade, and so on. 
 
 And the revival of this kind of Chauvinism, jingoism, or 
 whatever you choose to call it, which is and always has been 
 the great enemy to the peace of the world, keeps me, I 
 confess, in that state of disgust which one feels at a thing 
 which you find to your surprise is not too stupid to be 
 formidable, like what I suppose Cobdenites feel towards the 
 resuscitation of protection. 
 
 But of course I must admit that the question is one of 
 degree, and that there is a point at which you must take 
 measures to clip the wings of a neighbour who is at once 
 powerful and ill-intentioned. 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Blachford : March 8, 1879. 
 
 My dear Taylor, As to Frere you told me once that I 
 was possessed of an ' impetuous surefootedness ' I suppose I 
 have bestowed my impetuosity on you, and my sobriety on 
 the ' Nineteenth Century.' 
 
 I am angry with Frere and have been (before this affair) 
 since I read his memo, which is at the root of the Afghan 
 war. It seemed to me then, on contrasting his paper with 
 that of Lord Lawrence, that he was one of those over-confi- 
 dent men, who make and ruin joint-stock companies in. 
 private life, and destroy the princes and nations who trust 
 them in public. This prepossession may colour my views on 
 this Zulu matter. 
 
 ... I do not think Indian administrators understand the 
 conditions under which Colonial Government has to be carried 
 on. And I confess I think Frere takes this ignorance for 
 superior knowledge and does not hesitate to overrule and 
 force the hand of his superiors.
 
 1879 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 395 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Odcombe Rectory : March 30, 1879. 
 
 My notion about the recall is this. I agree with you that 
 if Frere's presence in South Africa was good for the public, it 
 might not be wise to sacrifice the Colony to departmental 
 discipline. But I think that he is a mischief, and that his 
 recall is in itself a good. Nothing, I conceive or rather infer 
 will make him carry into effect with reasonable loyalty a policy 
 that is not his own. And he has the power, so long as he 
 is there, of forcing the hand of Government to any extent. If 
 he does not choose to make peace it will not be made. If he 
 chooses to go on massacring those unlucky savages, on the 
 plea that if we do not kill them, they will kill us, the Govern- 
 ment which upholds him must send as many troops as he asks 
 for. And if another disaster should occur, and if the Cape 
 natives whom we are trying to disarm should rise behind us, 
 and the Boers declare themselves independent in front of us, 
 we shall have a pretty job on our hands. 
 
 The announcement of an intention to disarm even friendly 
 natives I have heard long ago spoken of by South Africans as 
 wildly imprudent. 
 
 To Cardinal Newman. 
 
 The Deanery, St. Paul's : December 23, 1879. 
 My dear Cardinal, Church tells me that this is the right 
 and allowable way of beginning a letter to you, to ask whether 
 you have any commands for Rome. Without his instruction 
 I do not think I should have got beyond the first two words. 
 If, which is most unlikely, we can take or do anything for 
 you, we shall of course be delighted, but we are off on Friday. 
 If any friend occurs to you to whom it seems natural to 
 you to give us a letter of introduction, we shall be very grate- 
 ful. But I do not write with that object, or want you to 
 trouble yourself about the matter. 
 
 . . . All sorts of good Christmas wishes to you. My wife 
 is not by me, or she would send hers most heartily. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD.
 
 396 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 To Cardinal Newman. 
 
 Mentone : January 2, 1880. 
 
 My dear Cardinal, Thank you very much for writing to 
 tell me of the death of your sister Jemima [Mrs. John Mozley] 
 her release, I suppose I may say. I often think of those 
 old Iffley days in which she added so much to the pleasure 
 of all about her, and certainly I was going to say not least 
 to mine. What a long time back it is, and how pleasant to 
 remember ! Before Germany or Italy or a Reformed Parlia- 
 ment, and when so many other things were so little what they 
 are, and Froude used to say, ' When will anything happen 
 to disturb this stagnancy ? ' It seems such a time of repose 
 that the world seems since that time to have been driven 
 out of (a fool's) paradise. 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Rome : February 19, 1880. 
 
 From Pisa where you heard of us, we came straight to 
 Rome. ... It is a curiously changed place since I was first 
 here. Then by the side of the Papal Court, lay and clerical 
 ycompris,\.\\e old Italo- Papal nobility, there was a comfortable 
 little English colony with an aristocracy of old residents and 
 artists, which touched the Italian society at its edges, and 
 lived with a quiet sociability which enabled every one to spend 
 his evenings (if he liked) with some friend or other, and to 
 organise archaeological or picturesque or ecclesiastical gaieties 
 in an easy inexpensive kind of way. Everything was very 
 dirty out of the best hotels, and every corner was full of 
 character contadini and processions and cardinals' car- 
 riages met you in the streets, and altogether the place had an 
 atmosphere of its own. But now the Embassies have revolu- 
 tionised society. ' The thing ' is to be asked to the Embassy 
 and meet the kind of people whom people aspire to meet in 
 London. The monks are shut up, the Pope and Cardinals 
 sulk, the artists are put into a corner, the archaeologists are 
 turning the picturesque old ruins into deserts, or museums, or 
 quarries, or tea gardens, and the public places are occupied by
 
 1880 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 397 
 
 Cook's tourists. ' A different class of people,' grumbled an 
 old resident with bitter scorn. ' People you never see at a 
 banker's, but who go and change a five-pound note at a money- 
 changer's.' Of course, churches and ruins and museums 
 remain, and most wonderful they are, more so as you know 
 more of them, but the pleasant dilettante side of Rome is 
 gone. I must say, however, it remains otherwise remarkable. 
 Judging by the enormous amount of what women call ' wash ' 
 which you see hanging on long ropes in all sorts of impossible 
 and magnificent places, and by the floods of Indulgenze Plen- 
 arie which are advertised on church doors as to be had dog- 
 cheap, I should say that there can hardly be a place in the 
 world where there was so much moral and physical washing, 
 not many places perhaps in which there still is more dirt. 
 
 Then (during the carnival) the contadini in their wonder- 
 ful dresses, getting up dances to the sound of the tambourine 
 on the public places, and on the grand steps of the Pincian 
 really as if they were doing it from gaiete de cceur a kind of 
 polka, I suppose (waltz without rotatory motion), in which the 
 figure seemed to be in the various movements of the arms. 
 Also certain itinerant sellers of things are charming. Last 
 Sunday we saw a crowd being harangued, and found the 
 orator to be a seller of brass watch-chains. The oratory was 
 an energetic, unbroken current, coming out unceasingly from 
 his mouth as from an instrument of music of the most 
 beautifully pronounced and (as far as I could see) perfectly 
 grammatical Italian all about the watch-chains. They were 
 sent to Francia, Inghilterra, and Allemagna nothing was 
 charged for the labour of making them, for it was ' lavoro for- 
 zato' 'dei poveri disgraziati che sono in carcere.' A manu- 
 facturer would give a ' regalo di cinque cento lire to the man 
 who could make them : and now he was selling them for 
 what ? non e di cento lire ; non e di cinquanta lire ; non e di 
 vehti lire ; non e di dieci lire ; non e di una lira ; non e 
 di novanta centesimi ; non e di ottanta centesimi ; non e di 
 settanta centesimi ; non e di sessanta centesimi ; ma e di 
 cinquanta centesimi ciascuno.' The figure of oratory with this 
 immense and deliberate descent from a hundred francs to fifty 
 centimes was too much for me, and I put forward my cinquanta,
 
 398 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 which he took, and gave me the chain without a second's dis- 
 turbance of his eloquence ; and I was glad to see that I had 
 induced one or more bystanders to do likewise. 
 
 Then the beggars, the old and maimed, are certainly very 
 repulsive, and I, for one, prefer giving to some kind of 
 almoner ; there is a half-savage, half-whining professionalism 
 about them which is unpleasant. The boys are some of them 
 obnoxious, as when they affect to sell things. ' Msoo, Msoo, 
 vaar chip, vaar chip,' ' one franc, vaar chip, vaar chip.' Also 
 when they hustle and crowd you, still more when they pelt you 
 with mud, as they did me when I was trying to sketch S. Gior- 
 gio in Velabro, the church which gives a title to Cardinal 
 Newman. (I shall send him a complaint of his parishioners.) 
 Also very bad when they stop playing to whine. ' Muoio di 
 fame: madre ammalata.' But I am rather overcome by the 
 handsome little vagabonds who look up laughing at you and 
 cry for a soldo, trusting to nothing but their beauty, their 
 manners, and their impudence. ' No, no, non c' e andate via ' 
 (with a deprecating movement of the palm of the hand, which 
 is supposed to be a specific). ' Si, si, c' e, c' e,' from a little 
 bright varlet who keeps trotting round you ; or again, ' No, no, 
 non c' e ; e poi se vi do qualche cosa, verranno tutti gli altri 
 a rubarmi.' ' No, no, non lo diro a nessuno, che m' avete dato 
 qualche cosa.' That little rascal got a penny for being so 
 bright and handsome and quick. Very immoral. 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Blachford : May 4, 1880. 
 
 My dear Taylor, Well ! What do you say to it all ? 9 
 Lord Ripon seems rather weak for India, Lord Cowper rather 
 shy for Ireland. Chamberlain tolerably well muzzled by the 
 Board of Trade. Forster an odd master for the Irishmen. 
 Dilke prudently harnessed with Granville, and the rest not 
 very originally but effectively and promisingly placed. I 
 wonder to myself much what the effect of truth and justice in 
 the fleshly shape of Forster will have on the perferuidum in- 
 
 s Lord Beaconsfield resigned, after the general election, in April 1880, and Mr. 
 Gladstone became Prime Minister.
 
 1880 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 399 
 
 genium. I never quite know whether Irishmen will think 
 truth and justice divine or ridiculous, either being on the cards. 
 Forster is neither one nor the other nor a compromise between 
 the two. I expect that his grim uncouthness will impress 
 them with an amiable sense x of~frrmtmess, and that they will 
 be rather puzzled at first to decide whether his truthfulness is 
 folly or wisdom, but will end by determining on the last. 
 What will be the effect of his aversion for jobbing (unless he 
 leaves it in Yorkshire) on the public opinion across the Channel 
 I am unable even to conjecture. I think I shall run up to 
 town for a day or two (at the Deanery) when Parliament 
 meets in earnest, which I suppose to be about the 2oth. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 To Lady Blachford. 
 
 London : May 28, 1880. 
 
 I went last night to see the ' Merchant of Venice ' and 
 ' lolanthe ' Irving and Miss Terry. She is quite charming. 
 In the casket scene (I am bound to confess) I fairly cried. 
 The admirable scenery and grouping helped the effect, but it 
 was produced in spite of a Bassanio who was a butcherly stick. 
 The judgment scene was admirable, in that difficult speech 
 of Portia's about mercy there was a pretty feminine earnest- 
 ness, without a shadow of declamation, which was quite 
 beautiful, every word coiilait de source, seemed to be suggested 
 by the abundance of the heart as it rose to the mouth, the 
 earnestness rising to the throne of heaven as its natural climax. 
 Irving was often very good, but the facial contortion was 
 terrific, and the occasional rant abominable (although, they 
 say, much retrenched). The speech ' Hath not a Jew eyes ? 
 &c.,' which seems to me one of concentrated wrath and scorn, 
 and sense of injustice, burning at heart, but under the steady 
 guidance of logical intellect, was bellowed as it might have 
 been in Billingsgate, only bass instead of treble. ' lolanthe,' 
 the one-scene afterpiece, was a piece of poetry acted. The 
 story so to call it is absurd beyond ordinary absurdity. A 
 beautiful princess, blind from her birth, but betrothed to a 
 neighbouring prince who does not know her or her defect, is
 
 400 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 kept by her father in a garden of delights with nobody in her 
 reach but a nurse, or servant, the father from time to time, 
 and a physician who is to cure her, without being instructed 
 as to the nature of sight, or told that anybody has more senses 
 than herself. For her cure (which must be effected at a par- 
 ticular moment if at all) it is necessary that she should be told 
 of her blindness, which her father has not the heart to do. 
 But the gallant knight her betrothed (who has never seen 
 and knows nothing on earth about her) penetrates the garden 
 by chance, falls in love of course, and finds out only gradually 
 that she is blind, and explains it to her. This bit is really 
 very beautiful.- Her movements, which tell the spectator that 
 she is blind, but yet leave it possible that her chance visitors 
 may not find it out, the gradual way in which the knight dis- 
 covers and tests it, the tenderness of his explanation, and her 
 curious surprised half comprehension, probably owe a great 
 deal of their effect to the fine delicacy of her acting, but seemed 
 to me as if they would read very beautifully as poetry. Of 
 course the cure is successful ; while the knight, writing in- 
 stantly to reject his betrothed, and invading the valley to carry 
 off his mistress (who, of course, has avowed her own position 
 with the utmost promptitude and innocence), finds that he has 
 only troubled himself ' enfoncer une porte ouverte.' The per- 
 plexities of untutored sight are well written and well acted. 
 She is impressed by the sky, and asks with awe (as I under- 
 stood) ' Is it God ? ' 
 
 I went to see Lear's drawings with Church, and if I had 
 not spent so much on ourselves, should have been grievously 
 tempted by one of Nemi, showing quite clearly the zigzag road 
 by which we descended from the town to the lake. 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Blachford : October 13, 1880. 
 
 My dear Taylor, I confess to a share in debauching the 
 Dean. That is to say, I persuaded him to stay here till the 
 last moment at which he was obliged to go to London. My 
 engine of persuasion was a certain marble manufacture, in 
 which I am engaged, and of which he became enamoured*
 
 1880 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 401 
 
 Eight or nine years ago I brought home from Rome a few 
 pounds' worth of fragments of various old marbles, and now I 
 have set to work (after giving the matter some study last 
 winter in Italy) in trying what can be made of them, experi- 
 mentalising in contrasts and harmonies on a very small scale. 
 Every morning after breakfast the Dean (who of course has 
 great schemes of decoration of St. Paul's floating about him) 
 started off with me to the ' shop,' and I believe would have 
 spent the day there fidgeting and watching, to the neglect 
 of all other duties, if I would have let him, and towards the 
 end of September we were approaching a climax (not yet 
 reached), and so he stayed on and on. Engagements are cer- 
 tainly his weak point, so when I have got him I keep him. 
 When he went away he was meditating a visit to Bourne- 
 mouth, and now he is complaining that London makes him 
 ill. So I expect you will hear or will have heard from him. 
 Lord Monteagle's outburst against the House of Peers (as 
 an institution) took me altogether by surprise. 1 It seems 
 to me that a very real use of that House is to prevent a 
 Ministry from stealing a march on the nation by means of a 
 majority among the representatives. And this the House 
 of Lords did in the case of the Irish Land Bill. 
 
 The country is lovely just now, and I think with horror of 
 having to go to town. How lazy one gets ! 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 To Dean Church. 
 
 Blachford : October 17, 1880. 
 
 What a muff European concert is, unless one or more 
 powers are prepared and allowed to act constable ! The 
 Sultan is something between a farce and a bad dream, in 
 which the same ridiculous or disgusting dilemma is always 
 turning up, in the midst of all your struggles to avoid it. The 
 eternal promise and the eternal breach, and the eternal sur- 
 prise at being eternally taken in exactly the same way, and 
 the eternal objections to the only mode of breaking through 
 the eternal dilemma, are enough to choke one. 
 
 1 See below, letter of October 18. 
 
 D D
 
 
 4 o? LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Blachford : October 18, 1880. 
 
 No doubt 'the sword of justice' (though sometimes 
 unwittingly the sword of injustice) is a noble thing, so is it a 
 safe thing to ' judge not that we be not judged.' And one 
 has to pick and choose between them. In the course of my 
 newspaper life I certainly feel that I have rather exceeded 
 propriety as a swordsman, and feel the temptation grievously 
 still. One feels that he who smites to the point is a public 
 benefactor, but it is sometimes at the expense of his own 
 credit and conscience. 
 
 I cannot find Monteagle's speech, but this is the less 
 matter, as he writes to say that it is incorrectly reported. I 
 should doubtless have said, like you (only with less knowledge), 
 that there were few men of whom a pleasing modesty was 
 more characteristic than of him. But modesty is after all a 
 local disease, extending to a man's manner but not his speech, 
 or to his speech but not his writings, and I thought with some 
 surprise that he might be of those who are carried out of 
 themselves when ' on his legs.' What I take to be the case is 
 that he was reported as saying that the House of Lords would 
 be well out of the way, when he really said or meant to say 
 that he for himself would rather be eligible for the Commons 
 than have a seat in the Peers, which of course any man may 
 say. It was pluckily done of him, to take his chance with a 
 set of Land Leaguers. 
 
 What a set of messes are afloat ! Turks, Afghans, Basutos, 
 and Irishmen, and floating in the clouds a possible European 
 war. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 To Dean Church. 
 
 Blachford : October 28, 1880. 
 
 Forster's fate in being nicknamed ' Buckshot ' is amusing. 
 I remember in old days at Blackheath an old lady who 
 supported at her own expense a school of 50 girls whom she
 
 1880 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 403 
 
 indulged alarmingly, and whom, when they were naughty, 
 from sheer dislike of giving them pain, she caused to lie down 
 in a long rather coffin-like box. What she got for her 
 humanity was, that she got mobbed in the streets as the old 
 woman who buried children alive so much for venturing on 
 unusual punishments or modes of self-defence. 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Totnes : December n, 1880. 
 
 My dear Taylor, You will have seen by the papers the 
 death of James Colvile. 2 You know what a loss it must be 
 to his wife ; but you have hardly seen enough of the family 
 to know what he was to them. An eldest brother and dis- 
 tinguished head of a family is always an idol, more or less, to 
 his sisters ; and he was so exceedingly kind and attentive, 
 that he was an unusually great part of their happiness, 
 particularly to his bedridden sister. It is, I need hardly say, 
 a great grief to my wife. I am at this moment staying here 
 with her and two of her sisters. Two of them are gone with 
 Lady Colvile to the funeral in Scotland at Craigflower, 
 where he will lie by his boy. 
 
 I suppose I ought to be in town at the opening of Parlia- 
 ment, though there will probably be little of interest in the 
 Lords. To say the honest truth I am getting more and more 
 doubtful whether the Liberal Party, as at present constituted, 
 can govern the country such as Ireland makes it without 
 involving us in some great calamities. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Blachford : January 27, 1881. 
 
 My dear Taylor, How have you got on with old father 
 Winter ? We have got off very well, and I really think have 
 had more amusement than inconvenience from the weather. 
 
 2 Lady Blachford's brother, Right Privy Councillor and Judge of the 
 Hon. Sir James Colvile, at one time Court of Appeal. 
 Chief Justice of Bengal ; afterwards a 
 
 D D 2
 
 404 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 There has been little or no distress in the neighbourhood to 
 wring our hearts. But for a day or two we had a curious 
 sense of isolation no butcher, no baker, no postman, no 
 doctor, of course no letters or newspapers, and everywhere a 
 great mass of white, filling the lanes, and sometimes with 
 drifts 10 or 12 feet high. As our weather was bright and 
 sunny (between the storms) the earth and sky were very 
 pretty to look at, which made the inside of the house cheer- 
 ful. Charming sunsets over the white snow, and purple 
 branches of trees and grey distance : then a pretty scene of the 
 men and horses and punt getting out of the pond a doe who 
 had tumbled in through the ice : then the gradual establish- 
 ment of communications with the outer world, principally the 
 village and the railway station : then the news of the wearing 
 or cutting of paths, the reappearance of joints of meat and 
 loaves of bread in the village, news of the sheep which had 
 been lost in the snow and found again. In one case six sheep 
 were dug out, because the vigilant farmer had observed that a 
 fox had been trying to scratch his way into a snow drift ; 
 and wisely judged that it was not for nothing ; so, pursuing the 
 fox's unfinished work, he recovered his animals. Now the 
 thaw is making way fast, and we see almost as much green 
 as white from the windows. 
 
 What a set those Irish are ! And what a very good speech 
 Forster's was. I wonder whether ever before in the history of 
 the world a set of individuals, in the face of an established 
 government, succeeded in establishing themselves and their 
 nominees as a machine for deciding how much of his pro- 
 perty every proprietor should be allowed to keep, and in 
 enforcing their decrees by carding, houghing, ear-cropping, 
 bludgeoning, and shooting, with the universal acquiescence 
 of the population, and the certainty that no jury would 
 convict any of their ministers. I thought there was something 
 very pathetic in Forster's cry that if he could have foreseen 
 all this he would never have been Irish Secretary, or indeed 
 a politician, which means that his theory of government, 
 resting on the notion that the multitude is reasonable, has 
 been wrecked upon Ireland.
 
 1881 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 405 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Blachford : March 9, 1881. 
 
 We are just back from London, where I have been on 
 the Cathedral Commission and kept by the Afghan debate. 
 Lord Derby's was, I thought, the speech of the debate, which 
 was, I imagine, a creditable one to their Lordships' House. 
 I arrived here last night in wind and rain, leaving behind me 
 our brougham upset (not with me in it), our enormous coach- 
 man pitched into a hedge, and our horse half-stunned, wholly 
 numbed, and chipped all over. However, it might have 
 been worse. The big coachman is only bruised, the carriage 
 will be set right, and the horse is to be available again. 
 
 This Transvaal business seems to be getting worse and 
 worse. I only hope they will not adopt the Protectorate 
 scheme, which according to the old precedent will disable us 
 from controlling the Boers and compel us to protect them 
 from the consequence of their misdoings. ' Felix opportunitate 
 mortis ' is the phrase which recurs to my mind when I think 
 of Colley's death. 3 It would have required some resolution in 
 him to survive this third disaster. What terrible mischief 
 these attractive, plausible, self-confident people are capable of 
 doing ! People seem to get sick of that school, and yet I 
 believe they will scarcely tolerate a really calm and just and 
 considerate policy. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Moorcross 4 : June 8, 1881. 
 
 My dear Taylor, I have just come into possession of the 
 ' Nineteenth Century,' and read your article on Carlyle. I like 
 it very much indeed, in every way. It is very interesting and I 
 am not disposed to quarrel with it, if it is a little on the friendly 
 side of just. The evil qualities which the reading of his remini- 
 
 3 At Majuba Hill, in February 1881. 
 
 4 His sister's home, near Blachford.
 
 406 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 scences suggests are envy and egotism ; and your paper leaves 
 on the mind the impression that, after all, there was a great 
 deal in Carlyle's circumstances and disposition which would 
 account for an appearance of these things far in excess of 
 the reality. Also it is very just to remind us that we are 
 misled, by the solid, deliberate appearance of a printed book, 
 into forgetting the passing character of Carlyle's disagreeable 
 thoughts. Let him that knows of no internal contemptible- 
 nesses in himself cast the first stone, All this, of course, 
 weights the condemnation of Froude, which I myself feel to 
 be righteous. Here I read your article a second time, by 
 way of parenthesis. It is very good indeed. How you can 
 write a thing of such force and richness on the wrong side of 
 eighty, I do not understand. But I have just had an argu- 
 ment about ' sulphuretted hydrogen.' I think you unjust (for 
 once) to Carlyle ; others otherwise. The saying seems to me 
 not a mere ' knocking over of another man's pageantry.' 
 But, in form of causticity, a sad reflection on the difference 
 between outward appearance and underlying truth. 5 But no 
 doubt the person who hears a thing said is the true interpreter. 
 I am, as you see, in the country, to lay the first stone of 
 a new church. How charming it is ! We are in a blaze of 
 rhododendrons, cows up to their knees in grass, hay growing 
 as fast as it can lay legs to the ground, martins, thrushes, 
 blackbirds, chaffinches all whisking about in the sun, making 
 me feel as if I would never go to London again, which not- 
 withstanding I must on the I3th for particularly disagreeable 
 business. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 i 
 
 5 In Sir Henry Taylor's review cent meteor. . . . they described what 
 
 {Nineteenth Cetihtry for 1881) of Car- they had seen in glowing colours and 
 
 lyle's Reminiscences the passage occurs : with much enthusiasm. Carlyle, having 
 
 ' He [Carlyle] delights in knocking over heard them in silence, gave his view of 
 
 any pageantry of another man's setting the phenomenon : " Aye, some sul- 
 
 up. One evening at the Grange a phuretted hydrogen, I suppose, or some 
 
 party of gentlemen returning from a rubbish of that kind." ' 
 walk in the dusk had seen a magnifi-
 
 1881 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 407 
 
 Note of a conversation with Cardinal Newman? June 30, 1881. 
 
 Newman began by talking about his portrait Millais 
 only has his sitters for one hour at a time ; he so often paints 
 children that he has got a knack of catching expressions with 
 great rapidity, so that he can get what he wants in an hour, 
 even though for part of the time his subject flags, or goes to 
 sleep, in which case he has to stop. After an hour the sitter 
 flags. For Newman he only requires six sittings. 
 
 Then he talked of his journey to Rome and his stay there : 
 how he went with a strong presentiment that he should be ill ; 
 he caught cold going to mass at Turin, and he wrote a 
 letter to Rome to have a physician to receive him. There 
 they just patched him up for the four days of ceremony, and 
 then he fell at once into the chill of fever, They told him it 
 would come back after 24 hours ; it did not, but it seemed to 
 make rushes at him ' like a mosquito ' and then to be checked. 
 Another very sharp attack came at Leghorn. He saw 
 nothing of the buildings at Rome as he had wished, and his 
 friends only for some moments, each like a bewildering 
 pageant. I asked if he had known the Pope before he was 
 Pope, and he said ' no,' and ' did not know how he 
 could have heard of him (J. H. N.), nor did he understand how 
 the Pope could ever have been elected by Cardinals all or 
 nearly all nominated by Pius IX. and belonging to the other 
 of the ' two parties' in the Church. He had lived entirely at 
 Perugia and was not of the Ultramontane party at all. The 
 Pope desired to build up, not pull down, i.e. make peace with 
 sovereigns : he had failed in Germany, Newman did not know 
 how he stood in Italy. He spoke of the election solemnly, 
 a 3 if it were a marvel ' God's will.' I asked if the Pope had 
 a charm of manner ; Cardinal Newman said very great to 
 him, and that he did not think he was entirely prejudiced, as 
 the Warden of Keble said the same thing. He added that 
 he was still ' very kind ' to him, inquiring after him, sending 
 messages &c., and in one case speaking very warmly of him 
 in the presence of several persons to friends whom Cardinal 
 
 6 Cardinal Newman had breakfasted house in London. Notes of the conver- 
 with Lord and Lady Blachford at their sation were afterwards written down.
 
 4 o8 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 Newman had recommended to him. I asked if there were 
 any prospect of the Church and State drawing together in 
 Italy. He answered doubtfully ; but said there was shortly 
 to be a Jubilee, and that among the subjects put forth to be 
 prayed for, besides the usual peace among princes &c., was 
 the private intention of the Pope, which might relate to his 
 dealings with the State. The Jubilee was in its nature not 
 ' jubilant ' but a solemn supplication under such circumstances 
 as now exist a great uprising of infidelity, especially in the 
 matter of education. Then there came some talk about there 
 being really a closer union between religious men at bottom 
 than appeared to be on the surface of things. He spoke of the 
 interest which men of all sects showed in himself, Dissenters, 
 Unitarians, Free Kirk, and the good that there was in 
 their publications, which he recognised. He said he hoped 
 there might be a levelling up going on a growing up of 
 external conformity from internal assimilation, like lava 
 bursting out hot, cooling down on the surface then giving rise 
 to lichens, then mould, then herbage, and then depth of rich soil, 
 rich with trees, vines, and all that nature produces. 
 
 After that we got on the sadder subject of unbelief, begin- 
 ning with the School Board question, and the difficulty of keep- 
 ing up the Roman Catholic schools, where there were high 
 school board rates to pay, and the hardships to poor Roman 
 Catholics of having to pay for both. He spoke of the 
 grandeur of the schools built by the school boards ; one in 
 particular was made to ' look like a church ' with its well- 
 planted entourage mimicking a graveyard (he seemed to have 
 a notion of Anti-Christ about it). He made a grievance (I 
 think a little needlessly) of being obliged to give the religious 
 instruction (rooms are provided with good intention, which 
 he acknowledged, for the purpose in this grand building ' into 
 which our boys and girls are decanted ') either at the begin- 
 ning of the school time when the children do not come perhaps 
 till the lesson is half over, or at the end when they are tired. 
 He said some Protestants send their children to a Roman 
 Catholic school because they say they wish their children 
 to be taught religion of some kind ; some are converted, 
 others not.
 
 1881 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 409 
 
 From this we got to the more general question of scepti- 
 cism. He spoke of the great intellectual unbelieving move- 
 ment ' It was so easy to be an atheist' I tried to make 
 him talk on the question whether in a sense a man may not 
 believe because he wishes it, in spite of a logical argument 
 to the contrary. He recurred to the familiar topic that instinct, 
 which is unanalysed argument, is often truer than what is 
 logically cogent. I observed that there seemed a question 
 beyond this whether a man may not sometimes rightly be 
 unfair to himself, determining e.g. to take a charitable judg- 
 ment or to think what will keep up his own and other 
 people's spirits for a great effort (say, in a shipwreck). He 
 gave a kind of assent, but said it was a subject to be written 
 about. 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Hollyhedge House : December 10, 1881. 
 
 My dear Taylor, I must confess I have been this time 
 unpardonably negligent in writing. As a half excuse I 
 have been unusually busy for the last three weeks attending 
 almost every day one of the Royal Commissions, in which I 
 have contrived to be. I am a good deal amused (amid a 
 ponderous amount -of dull detail of which ' Cathedrals ' have 
 at least their share) at the internal politics and contrivances 
 of a Commission of master minds, managing men, and 
 modest men. Canterbury is the master, Carlisle the mana- 
 ging man, and your humble servant, Mr. Walter James and 
 Mr. Dalrymple, Conservative M.P. for Bute, the modest 
 men. To whom may be added Lord Cranbrook, the man 
 of the political world. The master and manager pull the 
 coach. The man of the world oils the wheels, and the 
 modest men make suggestions, of which some are snubbed, 
 some are accepted, and one or two which upset a pet form of 
 managerial progress are outflanked. This outflanking is not 
 unamusing. The old idea which was supposed to be shot 
 down bobs up with nothing but a few feathers shot away, 
 and somehow or other, without one's exactly knowing how, 
 and without any special move which gives occasion to oppo- 
 sition, replaces itself in the scheme. Then it is amusing to
 
 4 ro LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 see how the idea of ' Divide et impera,' dealing with the 
 Cathedrals one by one, and so subduing them in detail, is 
 opposed by a novel combination of Deans and Chapters who 
 cry ' shoulder to shoulder,' so that each Dean and Chapter 
 meets the solid weight of the Royal Commission before him 
 by the solid weight of the Capitulate (will that do for a word ?) 
 behind him. However, our differences are few, and, if we are 
 wise, will be accommodated. 
 
 What are you saying or thinking about Ireland ? I have 
 always thought the Government are playing a most doubtful 
 game in allowing Chamberlain and Co. to dictate the policy 
 of coquetry. And now, of course, it seems likely that we 
 must do more in the way of civil war than what might 
 have been sufficient a year ago. However, it is a question 
 whether any one else could have done any better. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Blachford : April 25, 1882. 
 
 My dear Taylor, I have been most sincerely grieved at 
 seeing in the papers the death of Lady Minto. 7 What a loss 
 to every one who knows her ! There was* a kind of gracious 
 brightness about her which must have been charming to every- 
 body who came near her. The relinquishment of that and 
 all that it signified must make a sad blank in her home and 
 to you. I thought when I saw Lord Minto lately in London 
 that he spoke sadly and seriously about her state, but I had 
 no idea that it was so immediately anxious. 
 
 I have just finished the first draft of a long, perhaps 
 lengthy, report on Fever and Smallpox Hospitals which has 
 filled my mind for the last three months, and shall have to 
 spend most of the first fortnight in May in London to try to 
 finish it with corrections, excisions, and so on. I am glad to 
 do it, for I feel I am of some use to the Government, and I 
 am getting less and less disposed to be of use to them (if I 
 could be so) in domestic politics. So I am glad to do some 
 
 7 Wife of the third Lord Minto, and Elliott. She had been living for some 
 the authoress of the Memoirs of Htigh time near the Taylors at Bournemouth.
 
 1882 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 411 
 
 non-political work which may be my excuse for sitting still while 
 political turmoils are going on. I do not know how far it is 
 epicurean to feel that the world is going its own way, which 
 is not mine, and that I have shot my bolts for good or evil,, 
 am not likely to launch any more effective ones, and may 
 arrange myself quietly for adding what I can to the comforts 
 of those within my arm's length, during the few next years, 
 leaving to the rising politicians who ' would outwit God ' 
 to turn their sails to the winds and storms that they are 
 rousing. I think, however, I shall hardly be put to bed before 
 we have some very vigorous outburst of English common- 
 sense or English insanity. And I only hope Gladstone may 
 not go in for insanity. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. - 
 
 To Lady Blachford. 
 
 Hollyhedge House : May 8, 1882. 
 
 It [the murder in Phcenix Park] is certainly in all its 
 horrors the most dreadful thing of our days. . . . What is 
 terrible is that we have no right to be surprised at it. 
 The ' Irish World ' and the ' United Irishmen ' and dema- 
 gogues of all sorts have been threatening it, and I suppose 
 we all feel that if the murderers were caught and hanged 
 they would be martyrs in the eyes of the Irish people, like 
 the Clerkenwell murderers. This it is which the Govern- 
 ment ought to feel, and what some of them, I suppose, 
 do feel. . . . R. told me that he had gone into a shop 
 on Sunday to buy an ' Observer.' The woman of the shop 
 said they were all gone, but 'it is all true.' She added 
 that she had not been able to read it for crying. My 
 experience was different. We heard it before breakfast 
 through a servant and the ' Weekly Dispatch.' But we 
 thought it might be a canard, and I went to the railway 
 station to seek some other paper. The stall was closed, but 
 I went up to a seedy old man who was creeping out to the 
 railway, reading a paper. ' From a man round the corner,' 
 he said, and added ' It's true,' as if nobody could be think- 
 ing of anything else. To the shop I went, and bought an
 
 4 i2 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 ' Observer ' from a decent, respectable young woman, much 
 occupied in seeing that her boy handed out the newspapers. 
 Her observation was, ' Those Irish seem to be at it Is it 
 the President they have killed ? ' Strange ignorance, and in- 
 difference to anything but the sale of the news ! 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Blachford : May 29, 1882. 
 
 My dear Taylor, These are terrible times. Inter alia 
 Jerry 8 late Olaf is no more. The poor fellow had a bad 
 toothache (it is said), became unable to eat, fell off, was sent 
 into Plymouth to undergo dentistry at the hands of the 
 veterinary in most esteem there, was dosed (it is dimly sus- 
 pected) too much, and died. The gardener who looked after 
 him could not for a week speak or hear of him without tears 
 in his eyes, a compliment which he altogether failed to pay to 
 his own mother-in-law who died at the same time in his house. 
 My sisters are inconsolable (at least whenever they think 
 about ponies), and a general feeling of attachment and re- 
 spect has developed itself, which none of us suspected in one 
 another. A gipsy offered them (my sisters) another pony, 
 probably stolen, this morning. When they' asked him where 
 he lived, he almost laughed in their faces, and answered, 
 ' Why, about.' ' They were so jolly green ! ' However, they 
 did not buy the pony. 
 
 What do you hear of Ireland ? I feel almost hopeless, 
 particularly because Gladstone seems incapable of really taking 
 in the idea that the Parnells and the Dillons and the Anna 
 Parnells have to be treated as irreconcilable enemies. In 
 all his proceedings there seems to me a kind of undercurrent 
 of ' Do-ee, now,' which is incompatible with an inflexible ' you 
 shall,' and this even among his biggest words. It always 
 seems to me that it is certain ruin to have to trust a bitter 
 enemy, not because you think him honest, or have any fair 
 ground for thinking him repentant, but because you suppose 
 him to be the only man who can rein in his own adherents. 
 Even if you can buy him outright, which you probably 
 can't do, ' uno ai'ulso non deficit alter', ten to one he ' leaves 
 
 8 A Norwegian pony.
 
 1882 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 413 
 
 his tail behind him.' And you have weakened your position 
 for nothing. 
 
 I think I shall vote myself out of politics altogether. 
 I am old enough to hold myself thoroughly shelved. I 
 will not oppose Gladstone and Granville. I shall soon 
 find myself unable to support them (here in England), 
 and so I shall grow strawberries and go to sleep. I have 
 always felt that as everybody by the side of the duties 
 which come to his hand has some work which he would 
 take up with true natural gusto, the regeneration of mankind, 
 philosophy, advancement of art, and so on, so I in particular 
 should like to succeed in changing the face of a country, so 
 that the hills and valleys and people and cattle and houses 
 and roads looked cheerful and well cared for, and pleased 
 with one another (if one may say such a thing of hills and 
 valleys), and I should like well enough to crawl about for my 
 last few years mending holes and picking up loose stitches 
 in that direction. 
 
 I forget whether you ever met at our house an old 
 American friend of ours, whose death appears in the news- 
 papers Colonel Chester, a curiously simple-hearted genea- 
 logist, who always reminded me of the Jesuit saying which 
 Pascal bitterly attacks, that (with an application to the good 
 works of men) ' God had graciously given to the poor frog 
 the same delight in his croaking as the nightingale took in 
 her song.' He (Col. C.) devoted his life to genealogy, and 
 thought it well spent in ferreting out the minutest particulars 
 of the minutest families with a kind of enthusiastic devotion 
 which enabled him to say that at least he had done one thing 
 as no man had done it before him, or (I add) will probably do 
 after him. But, with all this, a keeper of the two great Com- 
 mandments, and as pure, affectionate, and simple-hearted a 
 man as I ever knew. One of the many ' good-byes for the 
 present,' which one has now to say, at least which one 
 desires to be able to say. 9 
 
 All kind things from both of us to all of you. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 9 Colonel Chester came over from mission to trace the pedigrees of several 
 America partly because he had a com- American families who claimed descent
 
 4 i4 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 To Miss C. Colvile. 
 
 October 1882. 
 
 My dear Charlotte, I have been reading chapters here 
 and there of Mr. George, 1 selecting some of which he 
 appeared to be most proud. He is a kind of man who pro- 
 vokes me beyond measure, because I know him so well, 
 without the power of exactly formulating him. He has a 
 certain amount of knowledge and reading, and, when he 
 clearly understands what he is writing about, a highly re- 
 spectable power of clear statement and illustration. Conse- 
 quently passages in which he states a course of familiar 
 phenomena, or sticks closely to a beaten track which has 
 been worn for him by wise men, he is readable, though un- 
 necessarily diffuse. 
 
 But he is totally without the power of sound original 
 thought, and totally without consciousness of his deficiencies. 
 Consequently, he is always trying to set wise men right, and 
 in consequence floundering in a sea of blunders which he 
 vainly attempts to disguise by a profusion of sentences. In 
 short, he is a voluble, shallow quack. 
 
 No inconsiderable part of my life (at the Emigration 
 Office) was spent in reporting upon the projects of such 
 pretenders, so that I have acquired a kind of feverish sensi- 
 bility in respect of such persons, a kind of wrath at feeling 
 that there are a lot of people who will think them fine, and 
 that it will take more labour than their whole generation is 
 worth to clear out the tangle in which they have enveloped 
 themselves, and to expose them to the unlearned. 
 
 If you want to see a specimen of fluent floundering, read 
 the chapter on ' Wages not drawn from Capital but produced 
 by Labour ' (at least if you can). It is an evidently pre- 
 tentious and unmitigatedly shallow attempt to disprove 
 
 from J ohn Rogers, the first of the Pro- probable that the Rogers of Blachford 
 
 testant martyrs in the reign of Mary. were descendants. This, however, 
 
 He proved to his satisfaction that none seems to have been rather because he 
 
 of them could possibly be descended could not disprove it than because he 
 
 from John Rogers (which, he said, could establish the pedigree, 
 would almost prevent his returning to ' Progress and Poverty, by Henry 
 
 his own country) ; but he thought it George.
 
 1882 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 415 
 
 what is self-evident in itself and utterly untouched by his 
 argument. 
 
 A and B are thrown on a desert island, with food to 
 sustain them till their next crop. A sows and reaps pro- 
 visions for two years. B sows and reaps nothing. A having 
 thus a superfluity of food (which is capital), and B having 
 none, A agrees with B to feed him for twelve months if during 
 that time B will build him a wall round his field to keep off 
 goats (who eat his crop) and will so double his crop. It is a 
 plain matter of fact that B's wages were paid out of A's first 
 crop. George spends two or three pages to show that they 
 were paid out of the third crop, and this even though a ship 
 were to touch at the island and carry them all off before 
 that third crop is reaped. 
 
 Really this is not an exaggeration of the man's folly, and 
 all done with the air of an oracle. Anathema esto. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 To Lady BlacJiford. 
 
 Athenaeum Club : December 12, 1882. 
 
 The change in Oxford as a city is certainly wonderful. 
 There was no walking about or seeing anything in the cold 
 fog (on Sunday), but the mere walking from Rickards's 2 to 
 Oriel and back led one through a suburb of villas, inhabited 
 by widows (of whom nine called on Rickards in his first six 
 weeks), professors, tutors, generals, retired India officers (civil 
 and military), and what was cornfield has become a large 
 University Park. 
 
 The number of undergraduates has increased 80 per cent. ; 
 there are two ladies' colleges ; the University and College 
 buildings are increasing every day (the University running 
 into debt), and altogether it is a ' Great Babylon.' 
 
 At Oriel I was much pleased to find myself and Church 
 made much of as patriarchs. We went to chapel there at 
 half-past five P.M. on Sunday, dinner immediately after in 
 
 2 The late Sir George Rickards, who had been Professor of Political Economy, 
 
 had just resigned his office of Counsel He was a contemporary of Lord Blach- 
 
 to the Speaker and was living at ford's at Eton but a little junior to him. 
 Oxford, where several years before he
 
 4 i6 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 hall ; the common room as in old times. They collect prints 
 of their old Fellows, and wanted to know whether I could 
 give them one of me. They picked up one of Beau 
 Brummel, who, it seems, was at Oriel, and (I suppose) not a 
 footman there. And on the whole I went home much 
 gratified. 
 
 I think I told you that I had considerable talk with 
 Jowett, who thinks that Latin and Greek are gone off in the 
 University. 
 
 On Monday Church declined Birmingham, 3 so I went 
 alone at 11.45, with much fear lest I should be blocked up 
 by fog or snow. I got there half an hour late, about 2, and 
 was shown up to the Cardinal in a dormitory (not his) where 
 a bed was prepared for me, if I chose to stay and sleep. 
 
 We talked about many things old times, I think, largely. 
 
 While we were talking he was told that Mr. would be 
 
 with him at four o'clock. I told him not to mind me, when he 
 
 said, au contraire, Mr. was for me, and that two others 
 
 with him (the music teacher) were to give me a trio of 
 Beethoven's' (I must find out which it was, I knew it very 
 well), which came to pass, and I listened from four o'clock or 
 so till it was time to wash for a quarter before six dinner. 
 The dinner was in a large bare room, with panelled sides, say 
 eight feet high, and a line of dusky pictures above, I should 
 think portraits of the Heads or Saints of the Order. Round 
 the room were small square tables, about half as big again as 
 a card table. The Cardinal had one to himself (he did not, 
 however, seem to eat), I another next to him, then two of the 
 fathers at each of the others ; one mounted a pulpit in the 
 corner of the room, and two carved the victuals at a table in the 
 centre, and handed it about as waiters fathers, not lay brethren. 
 The father in the pulpit read first some ten or twenty verses 
 of one of the Gospels (from the Vulgate), then in English a 
 short anecdote of St. Philip. He was a confessor to a rich 
 lady, and her relations were afraid that she would give him 
 her money. So they ordered St. Philip to give her up, he 
 went on. Then they ordered the servants to keep him out, he 
 
 3 To visit Cardinal Newman who was at this time head of the Roman Catholic 
 College at Birmingham.
 
 1882 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 417 
 
 went on. Then they threatened his life, and his friends 
 begged him not to run the risk. He said that he had a soul 
 to save, and that if he was killed for saving it, it would 
 be the happiest end a man could have. There ended the 
 story. There was a letter from St. Philip, whether playful 
 or serious I could not well make out, to a man who had 
 somehow deserted him. After this the reader and waiters 
 moved into their places to eat their own dinners, and one of 
 the fathers put two questions : one was the old one of lying to 
 save a man's life, giving a story as an instance ; then two or 
 three fathers gave their views. Newman had already told 
 me that he was too deaf now to hear what the fathers said on 
 such occasions, and so did not perform his part of summing 
 up, but left it to the interrogator, who gave us St. Augustine's 
 views and his own, nothing very new about either. Then 
 soon we got up and went away to the common room, very 
 plain and ascetic, but spacious, where we sat round the fire 
 and talked till my cab came to fetch me for the 7.20 train. 
 
 Of course it was late in such weather, and I did not get 
 to the Deanery till 12 o'clock, and sat up talking with them 
 till near one 
 
 To Cardinal Newman. 
 
 Blachford : December 22, 1882. 
 
 My dear Cardinal, Will you tell me or cause me to be 
 told what was the trio you gave me at the Oratory ? I know 
 it very well, but unless you give me its designation I shall 
 not be able to distinguish it hereafter from other old friends. 
 I want to ' ear-mark ' it. 
 
 So Church has refused to sit in the seat of Anselm, or in 
 what we hold to be such. How strange it seems ! But there 
 is no doubt, though he himself was doggedly silent on the 
 subject, that he had the offer. 4 The work would have been 
 plainly too much for him. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 I cannot say what a pleasure it is to me to have had the 
 afternoon at the Oratory. 
 
 4 Of the Archbishopric of Canterbury on the death of Archbishop Tait. 
 
 E E
 
 418 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Blachford : May 28, 1883. 
 
 My dear Taylor, I find it a little difficult to answer your 
 question shortly about Aubrey de Vere's article, 5 viz. how far 
 it and others in the same strain are likely to be useful in 
 affecting religious and irreligious convictions. 
 
 In the first place it is very interesting, attractive, and 
 elevating in its treatment of a side of moral theology. Many 
 a religious man will find that it gives flesh and colour and 
 development to thought which he had inchoate or undeve- 
 loped, or not at all. There is a clear usefulness of a high 
 character. 
 
 But what he is principally thinking of, I imagine, is not 
 its didactic, but its controversial use. 
 
 And on this it is that I find it rather difficult to see 
 clearly. Somebody has said (perhaps Coleridge) that every 
 one is born either an Aristotelian or a Platonist. 6 Of course, 
 every one who is worth a farthing is in some measure both. 
 A man must be something of a goose who has nothing of the 
 cogency and hard-headedness of (say) Bentham, and some- 
 thing of a block who has nothing of the transcendental 
 imagination of (say) Coleridge. Of course, also sentiment, 
 moral sentiment, lies at the root of all that is good or great 
 in faith. But some men are irresistibly governed by co- 
 gent reasoning, and some by captivating ideas. And those 
 who are peculiarly sensitive to one are^ not quite sound 
 judges of writers who appeal to the other. Now, I think that 
 I am Aristotelian and Aubrey de Vere Platonist, and I feel a 
 great difficulty in seeing how far considerations which would 
 not touch me if I were an adverse disputant ivould touch 
 persons of the (shall I say?) opposite and more transcendental 
 cast of mind. 
 
 A. de Vere says to his reader, ' Throw yourself into a state 
 of faith ; it is the noblest, wisest, happiest state just look at it 
 and see.' 
 
 s An article by Mr. Aubrey de Vere chiefly against Agnosticism, and cer- 
 
 in the Nineteenth Century for May 1883, tain views of Evolutionists. 
 
 ' On Subjective Difficulties in Religion,' 6 It is in Coleridge's Table Talk 
 
 written in defence of Christian Faith, under July 2, 1830.
 
 1883 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 419 
 
 ' No doubt,' the man replies, ' if I could get there. But I 
 find difficulties.' 
 
 ' Yes, but a hundred difficulties need not make one doubt.' 
 
 ' True again ; " but," says the doubter, " there are difficulties 
 and difficulties, and my difficulties are of a class which do 
 make doubts, and, worse than doubts, disbeliefs. I find it 
 impossible to reconcile the existence of evil with the belief in 
 a good and all-powerful God, to accept eternal punishment, 
 to get over the philosophical argument from necessity, &c." ' 
 
 If these do not present themselves to a man's mind as 
 solid grounds of doubt, he need not, me judice, go out of his 
 way to worry himself about them. But if they did to my 
 mind I should require something more than a general argu- 
 ment for distrusting difficulties. I should require something 
 to show me why I was at liberty to dismiss this difficulty and 
 not that, and that I was at liberty to dismiss the difficulties 
 of, or rather objections to, Christianity, while I was not at 
 liberty to insist on the objections to atheism. If I am to shut 
 my right eye, why the right ? If my left, why the left ? 
 
 The answers to these questions may be in the article. 
 But if so, they do not march up in battle array. The consi- 
 derations in which they are involved form an inspiring sight, 
 but they will not storm a fort held by Aristotelians of the 
 hard-headed kind. 
 
 But perhaps it is intended to teach (and this seems to be 
 involved in the title) that Christianity, by its mere exhibition 
 of itself, proves itself to a certain class of minds, and that for 
 those to w r hom it does not so prove itself, independently of 
 obstacles to belief or insufficiency of what is generally called 
 evidence, there is no help. 
 
 Probably of the mass of mankind this is true. But in the 
 ' Nineteenth Century ' we deal, or try to deal, with men of mind. 
 
 With men of this class, who have a strong conviction that 
 our reasoning powers were given us to be something like 
 sovereign guides in sifting religious and moral truth the 
 article would not, it appears to me, produce much effect. Nor, 
 I think, would it convince that class of persons that they were 
 not intended to take reason as something like a sovereign 
 guide.
 
 420 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 But I quite understand that to those persons who have 
 more power of overbearing the reasoning power when they 
 have a firm grasp of a vivid idea, A. de V.'s picture of faith 
 (for this is what it comes to) might be an assistance to believe 
 what they desire to believe, or even an inducement to believe 
 what they were disposed to consider indefensible by reason. 
 This, of course, would be a sphere of usefulness independent 
 of the merely didactic effect of preaching aux convertis. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 September 7, 1883. 
 
 My dear Taylor, One of the growing evils of old age is 
 having nothing to say. Another is not knowing that you 
 have nothing to say. From the second I am happily pre- 
 served. But to the first I am more and more a prey, and one 
 result is that for I do not know how many weeks I have 
 been asking myself what I have said to you, and have been 
 answering ' Nothing,' et sic de aliis. And now I only write in 
 a desperate way, for shame ; and because I shall get more, I 
 know, than I deserve in answer. 
 
 We have had here the Dean, his daughter Mary, and his 
 married daughter Helen, with her husband, F. Paget, son of 
 Sir James, and Rector of Bromsgrove. 7 
 
 The visit is a kind of appendix to their honeymoon. And 
 this has been an occasion for making the father and son-in- 
 law really know one another (for which there is nothing like a 
 country house), taking good long tete-a-tete walks, which, as 
 they are sympathetic souls, pleases everybody. He (the Dean) 
 is, I think, getting a little worn out by the air and the duties 
 of London. 
 
 I am glad to receive this morning the report on ' Eccle- 
 siastical Courts.' There is always a satisfaction in feeling 
 that you have really done with a thing, even though you 
 may be but fifteenth fiddle in it. It may lay some dust. 
 Especially it includes what I suppose will be a standard 
 account of the growth of ecclesiastical jurisdiction, by Dr. 
 
 ' Now Dean of Christ Church.
 
 1883 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 421 
 
 Stubbs, the great historical indagator of the day in such sub- 
 jects, which will render certain sorts of loose talking almost 
 impossible. But I can hardly hope for any such agreement 
 between political and ecclesiastical parties as will make 
 remedial legislation possible. The existence of Gladstone is 
 the only thing which gives it a chance. And as the report 
 and evidence comprise little short of a thousand folio pages, 
 mostly of small print, the subject may have a charm for him. 
 I wish you were here. It would do you good, I am sure, in 
 the (rare) intervals of sunshine, to look out on the trees and 
 grass and water and wild ducks and deer, not to say, on 
 Wednesday last, some two hundred and fifty school children 
 eating and drinking and trundling hoops and swinging from 
 the branches of the trees. 
 
 What an insanity of objectless greed seems to possess those 
 Frenchmen, unless indeed they seriously desire to overrun 
 China, which could hardly be called objectless. 8 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 To Cardinal Newman. 
 
 Athenaeum Club : February u, 1884. 
 
 My dear Cardinal, I have not had time to look up much 
 in the curiosity line ; and what I have done makes me think 
 that I cannot improve on your suggestion of a book. One 
 of the best things I have seen for your purpose [a present 
 to a friend] was a pretty and genuine-looking old cabinet of 
 ebony and ivory (2O/.). But at Sotheran's (whither Beresford 
 Hope sent me) I have seen one thing which seemed to me 
 excellent. I enclose a few leaves from his catalogue, marking 
 a few articles which are about your price. The best was 
 Lacroix (p. 41), to be bound in 9 vols. morocco, cost from i6/. 
 IO.T. to i8/. (rather trifling). But the two best things I saw 
 were : 
 
 1. A large folio (2 vols.) of the ' Roman Catacombs,' with 
 careful engravings, but not coloured (i5/. in morocco), and 
 what I should recommend. 
 
 2. ' La Renaissance ' (price i6/. i6s. in morocco), 2 folio 
 
 8 The French annexed the Tonquin province in 1883.
 
 422 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 volumes, large margin, magnificent print, altogether ' de luxe r 
 and plenty of excellent etchings of buildings a beautiful 
 book, in art far superior to the ' Catacombs/ whatever the 
 latter may be in point of interest. 
 
 Sotheran seems to be in constant communication with the 
 Oratory, and would readily send you a volume for inspection. 
 If you like it you can settle a binding (why cannot you put 
 outside one of those splendid coats of arms surmounted by a 
 Cardinal's hat which one sees on some old books ?). 
 
 If not, I shall be in town again for the levee of the 22nd 
 (to thank the Queen for making me a G.C.M.G.), and will try 
 my hand again. I suspect, however, that it will require some 
 idling about in curiosity shops to find anything better than 
 the ' Renaissance.' The price of antiquities, china, &c., I am 
 told, has multiplied itself by ten in the last thirty years. 
 Some measure of the growth of great fortunes. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 To Cardinal Newman. 
 
 Athenaeum Club : February 21, 1884. 
 
 My dear Cardinal, First, all good wishes to you on your 
 birthday. You will not receive them, but I write them, on that 
 day. 
 
 Next, I have just ordered ' The Renaissance,' which is, as 
 you suppose, a book of which the value consists in its etchings 
 of ecclesiastic and other Renaissance architecture. Sotheran 
 says it shall be bound up in three weeks, meaning, I suppose, 
 six. I have told him when it is finished to write to you for 
 directions. 
 
 I was half tempted to put it in an ecclesiastical livery, but 
 I could not see any purple leather that pleased me, and so- 
 ordered a smooth polished brown morocco, with no gilding 
 except the lettering on the back and (more ornately) on the 
 side, fit for a book that lies on a table. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD.
 
 1885 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 423 
 
 To Cardinal Newman. 
 
 Blachford : January 16, 1885. 
 
 My dear Cardinal, I have been reading Boswell's ' Life of 
 Johnson ' actually for the first time. What do you say to the 
 following ? ' Sir, your disquiet is a foolish affair. Why, sir, if 
 my wife bade me give you her love she would never, to be 
 sure, tell you to say nothing about it. No, sir. If the Pope, 
 who I am informed is a man of sense, intended to afford you 
 a gratification, he would never have imposed a condition to 
 destroy half its value. Mr. Warton used to say at Trinity 
 College, " Quod taciturn velis nemini dixeris," and if the Pope 
 had been ashamed of his affection for you, why, sir, he would 
 have said nothing about it.' 9 
 
 As somebody says, ' Them's my sentiments.' 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Blachford : January 20, 1885. 
 
 My dear Taylor, I send you, in case you should not be 
 in the way to see it, cuttings from a ' Pall Mall Gazette,' con- 
 taining a letter from me on a proposed Federative Council, 
 also the editorial comment. The editor wrote to me, point- 
 ing out his and Lord Grey's suggestions, and asking me either 
 to allow myself to be interviewed on the subject or to give 
 them my opinion in publishable shape. 
 
 I am rather glad of this, as I totally disbelieve in the 
 possibility of Federation, into which the world is running with 
 its eyes shut, and really think that the question ought not to 
 go ' by default.' The cat wants belling. 
 
 I hope my letter will compel people to think out the 
 question seriously. And if nobody agrees with me I must 
 suppose myself wrong. 
 
 I am ordering the ' Edinburgh ' with Aubrey de Vere's re- 
 view of Spenser. I shall expect a great deal from it, and 
 
 n This is an answer in the John- scruples about repeating to others some 
 sonian manner, to a letter in which kind and complimentary sayings of the 
 Cardinal Newman wrote that he had Pope.
 
 424 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 shall be curious to see what he makes of Duessa and Archi- 
 mago, which must be offences to him. 1 
 
 I see the ' Pall Mall ' is attacking the Peer Ministers (Gran- 
 ville, Derby, Northbrook). I have long thought that the 
 number of these in every Ministry was an indication of some- 
 thing skin deep in democracy. And I am not surprised at the 
 Radicals making a grievance of it. 
 
 What is our next Parliament to be ? Has any one what- 
 ever any guess ? 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 The Objections to the Colonial Board of Advice. 
 
 You invite me to give an opinion on a proposal contained 
 in your leading article of the pth inst., and founded on a 
 suggestion of Lord Grey's, for the establishment of a Council 
 to advise the Colonial Office. I do not desire to discuss 
 Lord Grey's proposal, which is that this Council should be a 
 Committee of her Majesty's Privy Council not necessarily, I 
 suppose, of ministerial politics. I will only say that I have 
 not personally a great faith in councils of advice, which seem 
 to me calculated to embarrass strong administrators, and 
 perhaps still more to embarrass weak ones. I believe that 
 departmental business is most effectively performed by one 
 officer, to whom his subordinates are responsible, and who is 
 himself responsible to some further superior or to the public, 
 without the shelter of colleagues or Council. In the case of 
 a Board, which has somewhat of the nature of a Council, I 
 feel confident, from many years' experience, that unprofitable 
 discussion, with its consequent friction, delay, and indecision, 
 is best avoided by doing as much individually and as little 
 collectively as possible. When higher matters are concerned, 
 it seems to me that if a Minister, and not least a Secretary of 
 State for the Colonies, should want advice, he should take it 
 from the Cabinet, or from a Committee of the Cabinet, to 
 which he belongs, and to whose judgment his policy must 
 conform itself. If he wants information he should be at 
 liberty to seek it where it is to be found without any official 
 
 1 Mr. de Vere had joined the Church of Rome.
 
 1885 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 425 
 
 restriction on his choice of informants. Nor, I would submit, 
 should he be hampered by the necessity of communicating 
 with any but those whose interests give them a right to be 
 heard, and that to the extent only which in his opinion the 
 public interests permit. If a man is not fit to be trusted with 
 this discretion he is not fit to be Secretary of State. In 
 discussing your own proposal I am afraid I must write more 
 of a treatise than either of us would wish. 
 
 In the first place you will at once see that I approach the 
 question from a departmental point of view, and if I seem to 
 ignore the broader considerations with which it is supposed to 
 be connected it is because I hold them to be delusive. For 
 I am bound to avow myself one of that apparently small 
 minority who look upon Federation as an unattainable 
 phantom, on grounds which I ought at least generally to 
 indicate. Even in the matter of foreign policy, about which 
 alone the question could arise, I cannot conceive the possi- 
 bility of our having continued to conduct the Government of 
 the United States of America and the United Kingdom of 
 Great Britain by one sovereign authority, localised either in 
 London or in Washington, or with one foot in one place and 
 one in the other. And what would, in any contingency, have 
 become impossible by this time in the case of the United 
 States, must, as it appears to me, become impossible, as time 
 goes on, in the case of all great and distant Anglo-Saxon 
 colonies. If so, the question is not whether the useful and 
 interesting tie which at present connects us can last for ever 
 or even for very long but whether that transitional 
 relation will be longest and most beneficially preserved by 
 tightening or relaxing it. Hitherto we have proceeded on the 
 principle of relaxation, and by so doing we are admitted, I 
 believe, to have gained more in mutual contentment than we 
 have lost in authority. I admit, however, that the question 
 has changed its aspect. Formerly it was found that we 
 endangered the connexion by claiming to interfere with the 
 local affairs of the colonists. The doubt now is whether we 
 shall not endanger it and ourselves by allowing them to 
 interfere with our Imperial policy. My own strong impres- 
 sion is that we shall. The notion of a great Anglo-Saxon
 
 426 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 alliance, not formed with a specific object, as to arrest the 
 supremacy of some overgrown power or immoral principle, 
 but on a general understanding (as I conclude) that all shall 
 join in furthering the wishes and interests of each, seems to 
 me likely, if, per impossible, it should last long enough, to 
 degenerate into a successful or unsuccessful contrivance for 
 bullying the rest of the world. To contend for such an 
 alliance on the ground that Anglo-Saxons the great ex- 
 terminators of aborigines in the temperate zone would, when 
 confederated, set a new and exceptional example of justice 
 and humanity, seems to me a somewhat transcendental 
 expectation. 
 
 Having said so much, I proceed, subject to the prejudice 
 which I have raised against myself, to the specific proposal 
 made in your paper. Like Lord Grey, you propose a Council 
 of Assistance for the Colonial Office, but one which is to 
 consist, not of Privy Councillors, but, with possible and 
 immaterial additions, of the High Commissioner of Canada 
 and the Agents-General of the other colonies having respon- 
 sible Governments. It is with this, the backbone of the 
 matter, that I now desire to deal. I first point out that all 
 these officers are servants, not of the Queen of England, but 
 of the Queen of Canada, Victoria, New South Wales, and the 
 rest. I mean this : Queen Victoria is Sovereign of the 
 British Empire, and through the British Parliament exer- 
 cises, within certain constitutional limits, legislative autho- 
 rity over that empire. She is also Queen of the United 
 Kingdom, and conducts its government through Ministers 
 designated by the people of the United Kingdom and not 
 otherwise. She is also Queen of Canada, and a Governor 
 appointed by her conducts the government of that Dominion 
 through Ministers designated by the Canadians and not 
 otherwise. The High Commissioner is not the servant of 
 the Queen of England, responsible through the English 
 Ministers to the people of England, but of the Queen of 
 Canada, responsible through Canadian Ministers to the people 
 of Canada. You may quarrel with my language, but the 
 facts which it is intended to exhibit are indisputable and in- 
 evitable. To illustrate their relations we may imagine, what
 
 1885 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 427 
 
 is quite imaginable, that Ministers of Canada or Victoria or 
 the Cape of Good Hope, to whom the support of the Irish 
 party had become indispensable, might appoint Irish Agents- 
 General, with special instructions to ally themselves with the 
 National party in embarrassing the existing English Govern- 
 ment. To execute those instructions would be their duty, 
 and we see that much might easily be done in that way. 
 The supposition is not, I trust, likely to be realised, but it 
 illustrates the duties of a Colonial Office as they are and as 
 they would remain. 
 
 And now what is the actual and what the proposed posi- 
 tion of these officers in relation to the Minister of the Queen 
 of England ? Their actual position is one which, originally 
 viewed with some jealousy in Downing-street, has been of 
 late cordially accepted and studiously raised in dignity and 
 influence. Everything seems to be done and to be doing by 
 the Imperial Government to give Agents-General, relatively 
 to the Colonial Minister, a status analogous to that which 
 is held by the representatives of foreign States of equal im- 
 portance in relation to the Minister for Foreign Affairs. 
 They are held, I apprehend, to be within their proper sphere 
 when they ask from the Colonial Office any information 
 which they need, and present any remonstrance or representa- 
 tion which they think is in place. This they are able to do 
 with the full weight of their position, individually, or in 
 groups, or as a whole. And for this purpose they are at 
 liberty to consult together, and by mutual consent to combine 
 into an organisation as coherent legally as that of the British 
 Cabinet. What is proposed is this that the association of 
 those colonial servants shall not be left to voluntary agree- 
 ment, but, as a matter of form, shall be established by an act 
 of the Imperial Sovereign, and, as a matter of substance, shall 
 have a certain Imperial standing and authority over against 
 the English Minister a locus standi not only outside the 
 walls of Downing-street but within it ' a footing inside the 
 office,' with the ' right to demand information,' and a ' re- 
 sponsibility for the advice ' which (asked or unasked ?) they 
 are to give. What this responsibility is to be, beyond that 
 which they are now under to those whom they represent, I
 
 428 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 do not understand. What it would soon come to, I suspect, 
 would be this : not that they would be responsible for giving 
 the advice, but that the Secretary of State would be in- 
 creasingly responsible for neglecting it. 
 
 And now let me consider the working of the scheme. It 
 is certain that in at least nine colonial cases out of ten no 
 association would be of the slightest use. The questions with 
 which the Colonial Office is concerned arise between the 
 English Government and this or that colony, and would only 
 be confused by extraneous meddling. Where there is com- 
 munity of interest there is no difficulty in bringing about 
 common consultation. 
 
 In the case of intended and united pressure on the 
 Imperial Minister, the Colonial Agents might possibly be a 
 little strengthened (if that is an advantage) by their Imperial 
 position. But, on the other hand, when I consider what 
 common interests Canada has either with Australia or the 
 Cape Colony, I cannot help thinking that the combined 
 Council would in reality have no appreciable work to do ; and 
 when I consider further that they might think it due to their 
 dignified position to do something or other, and that there is 
 somebody who is always finding mischief for idle hands, I 
 cannot help fearing that occasions might be embraced for in- 
 opportune ventilation of embarrassing principles, or for what 
 our Transatlantic relations call ' log-rolling.' ' I will roll 
 your log if you will roll mine. If you (Queensland) will Help 
 me (Newfoundland) to induce John Bull to risk a quarrel with 
 France for the sake of my fisheries, I will help you to induce 
 him to risk a quarrel with Germany about the occupation of 
 New Guinea.' It seems to me desirable from an English 
 point of view not to give momentum and authority to this 
 kind of pressure, which tends to make many suffer for a few. 
 Still less should I think it advantageous that a body of the 
 Queen's colonial servants should have a footing inside the 
 office of her English Minister. Communications between 
 them appear to me to stand best as they are matters of 
 discretion and courtesy. Friendly as the relations should 
 always remain between the colonial representatives and the 
 English Minister, there may always be matters which it
 
 1885 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 429 
 
 would be imprudent or premature for either to disclose to the 
 other. And if so, the limits of disclosure must of necessity 
 be discretionary, according to the nature of the subject, and, 
 I add, the character of the person to whom the communica- 
 tions are made. 
 
 But you may think that my own reasonable limits as a 
 correspondent have long been over-passed. I can only 
 apologise by saying that you have set me writing, and that 
 if a writer belonging to a small minority does not say what 
 he has to say for himself nobody else will say it for him. 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Blachford : March 26, 1885. 
 
 My dear Taylor, No, I am not gone to what you call the 
 bad meaning I suppose Acheron or Phlegethon or worse, 
 only getting a little like the 'dull fat weed that rots itself at ease' 
 in that neighbourhood. I have been up to town to give a 
 vote about Egypt, and to finish off that very Lethean process, 
 the Cathedral Commission. And now I am back again to my 
 cabbages. 
 
 I have not yet got your revised Autobiography. But I 
 have read the ' Times ' article, which is in a satisfactory tone 
 and will I suppose make the book at once an object of curio- 
 sity. I shall be disappointed if it does not take hold of 
 people. I did not think that the review caught very well the 
 characteristics of the book, or rather I thought that it did not 
 exhibit them in good perspective. . . . 
 
 I have been exerting myself to give a lecture to the 
 ' Cornwood Recreation and Improvement Society ' (I need 
 not say this name was composed by the schoolmaster) on 
 Egypt, and was much gratified by the great guffaws of 
 laughter which were produced by some of the stories which 
 the Egyptian priests told Herodotus. There is an odd 
 sense of mixture between the venerable and the frivolous 
 in a series of jokes 3,000 years old, coming out as compact 
 and genuine as mummies, and very like ours. . . . The Dean 
 I wish were better ; he was very ill in the winter, and recovers 
 his strength slowly. I want him to come here, which always
 
 430 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 does him good. But he has to enthrone his new Bishop 
 and to keep the peace between irreconcilable Canons, and 
 generally, like other tender-conscienced people, thinks himself 
 more necessary than he is, not recognising the virtue of 
 'wholesome neglect' (I have often thanked thee, Jew, for 
 teaching me that word). And I am afraid he will not slip 
 cable till he slips off to the South. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Blachford : June 22, 1885. 
 
 My dear Taylor, I have been constantly thinking of a 
 letter to you, but am always repelled by the sense that in 
 the solitude of Blachford I have nothing to say, minding 
 my own affairs and scarcely reading more than an epitome of 
 the newspapers. It seems almost a waste of nervous power 
 to excite yourself about events which you cannot influence 
 and which you have not long to endure. 
 
 However, I am deep in stone and mortar, planning, or 
 rather now building a village clubroom, a village school- 
 mistresses' cottage, dormitories for single men (labourers) 
 attached to the clubhouse, and arranging for the settlement 
 of some labourers in cottages with some cows attached. All 
 which, however, is settled when it is settled, and, when the 
 work begins, is only a pleasant occasion for idling. . . . 
 
 I have been a good deal amused at reading (or rather 
 hearing read, for I have greatly to spare my eyes) a set of 
 biographies or letters Mountstuart Elphinstone, the Indian 
 statesman, Disraeli, and Gordon. It makes one curiously 
 alive to the differences of which our species is capable, in the 
 single ' variety ' of English public men. 
 
 Elphinstone is a type of character which I admire greatly 
 except as compared with a Christian ideal. A great but not 
 overpowering desire for distinction, absolute devotion to the 
 public good, courage, intellect, cultivation, no jealousy or 
 desire to surpass others in short, a man wholly noble, and, 
 what is getting rare among Indian statesmen, possessed with
 
 1885 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 431 
 
 the idea that, at bottom, India is to be governed with a view 
 to what is good for the Indians and not for the present or 
 prospective interests of England, except so far as the two 
 may fairly be considered as bound up together. A perfect 
 character of its kind, but without the warmth of religious 
 enthusiasm, and so with something of the cold beauty of a 
 Greek statue, though with powers of friendship and bene- 
 ficence which fascinated those within reach of him. 
 
 Dizzy's letters (a thin duodecimo) 2 make one like his 
 sincere affection for his family, but exhibit shamelessly on 
 his part, and I suppose unconsciously on the part of his 
 editor, an appetite for low notoriety, even that of a buffoon, 
 which is really beneath contempt, and is only elevated by his 
 undisguised contempt for the people whom he labours to 
 impose upon. There is a sparkling enjoyment of his own 
 impudence and the stupidity of his neighbours which is 
 really attractive ; but one thinks, ' That this man should have 
 been a belauded Prime Minister, and (of all countries in the 
 world) of England, to whom on " Primrose Day " Conservative 
 cultus is paid as to a political saint ! ' And this is the 
 effect, on a reader, of letters written by himself and edited by 
 an admirer. 
 
 Gordon makes up the triad. It is impossible to imagine 
 a man living more completely in the presence of God, or 
 more absolutely careless of his own distinction, comfort, 
 wealth, or life, a man unreservedly devoted to the cause of 
 the oppressed. One bows down before him as before a man of 
 a superior order of being to one's own. But he is almost as 
 ' odd ' now and then as Sir Francis Head. And though he is 
 constantly engaged in keeping down vanity, there is a degree 
 of self-gratulation which jars on you. 
 
 Our country is beautiful just now ; we live among seas of 
 rhododendrons, the beauty of which follows on that of spring. 
 But we are immersed in misty rain, and only see what there 
 is to see in short bursts of fine weather. 
 
 Well, so Lord Salisbury seems in the saddle. What is to 
 be done with a party who cannot trust English finance in the 
 
 2 ['Home Letters, written in 1830, 1831.']
 
 432 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 hands of the only man of them (Northcote) who understands 
 the subject, and who place India under the dominancy of 
 Lord Randolph Churchill ? 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 To Lady Taylor, 
 
 Blachford : August 17, 1885. 
 
 My dear Lady Taylor, I am really vexed at not complying 
 with any wish of your husband's, but in some things a man 
 must act according to his own nature (' can but stand on his 
 own legs ' some people say) whether that nature is abstractedly 
 the best or not. 3 
 
 Now, in limine (beg pardon for Latin) I have perhaps a 
 morbid repugnance to those monster petitions which derive 
 their weight from numbers of signatures, given in a great 
 measure because they are asked for, without any real 
 guarantee that the signatories care or know much about the 
 matter. I have been asked to sign many such but have 
 pretty steadily refused. 
 
 Next, allow me to observe that it seems a Roman Catholic 
 petition. It addresses the Pope as head of the Catholic 
 Church, and begs him to issue his advice to the bishops of 
 ' the Church,' silently unchurching all others than those of 
 his communion. 
 
 But I am not a Roman Catholic, or quasi Roman Catholic. 
 Again, on the one hand, I am not inclined to address a 
 4 humble petition ' to a prelate who is always anathematising 
 me (at least once a year, I believe) ; on the other, I do not 
 feel that I could properly come forward to teach him his 
 duties. 
 
 May I say that I am inclined to think that the old 
 Italian would feel an amusement not altogether respectful 
 at the sight of the presenting Cardinal followed by four 
 flunkies staggering under what Mr. Colam describes as the 
 ' immense ' package of orthodox and heterodox signatures 
 
 3 This letter was in answer to a use his authority for the prevention of 
 request that Lord Blachford should sign cruelty to animals, 
 a petition to the Pope begging him to
 
 1885 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 433 
 
 procured by 500 registered ' unsectarian ' societies ? It would 
 be an odd sight. 
 
 Finally, I cannot honestly say that I believe that the 
 example of his Holiness (in issuing a pastoral on the 
 subject) ' will be followed by all sects and nations in the 
 world ' and cruelty to animals ' checked if not banished from 
 the face of the earth.' 
 
 On the whole, I hope you appreciate my difficulties of 
 principle and detail, and will accept the answer which I 
 got some fifty-three years ago when I invaded the rooms 
 of an undergraduate to get him to sign an Anti-Reform 
 petition : ' Thank you, I should be very happy, only I had 
 rather not.' 
 
 Yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Blachford : .Sept .24, 1885. 
 
 My dear Taylor, Turning over some old letters lately I 
 have found various complaints of my being ' irresponsive, 
 unacknowledging,' &c., which naturally turned my mind to 
 you who are always saying that I owe you a principal debt of 
 letters with large interest in the way of contrition. But what 
 have I to say ? Life, I hope not very blamably, gets taken 
 up with matters which interest no one but one's self, what 
 Lord Granville scornfully calls ' growing cabbages,' but which 
 includes not only propagation of shrubs, trees, wild duck, 
 deer, pheasants, and so on, but also the building of cottages, 
 clubhouse, schoolhouse, which change my level of occupation, 
 for better or worse, from yours to Lady Taylor's. 
 
 In the matter of cruelty to animals, I am really sorry to 
 show you a cold shoulder. I think, however, that, if I do not 
 join a multitude to worry the poor old Pope, I furnish a happy 
 existence while it lasts to a large number of eatable birds 
 and beasts, wild and tame, and a comfortable subsistence to 
 a stable of horses, in all say about 250 or 260 living beings, 
 all being more or less petted, the pheasants for the first half 
 of their lives, the ducks, deer, chickens, horses, cows, and pigs, 
 after their respective scales of enjoyment, for the whole of it, 
 
 F F
 
 434 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 and none being exposed, so far as can be prevented, to the 
 discomforts of a deserted old age, such as I am liable to if 
 (quod absif) I were to survive her who has promised to look 
 after me. 
 
 Is not all this indeed a proof of having nothing to say? 
 I have had the Dean with me for a short visit, looking, I think, 
 better than he has for some time, in spite of an August of 
 work in London. But I think London winters tell on his 
 constitution, and (as is natural after seventy) his physical 
 strength is not what it was. I am told by my doctor that I 
 must expect one year between seventy and eighty to do as 
 much execution on me as four between sixty and seventy. 
 
 So the Eastern question is showing signs of life. What a 
 humbug (I venture to think) the Palmerston-Disraeli policy 
 about Russia seems to be, except that it may bring in Austria 
 as a counter-claimant against Russia for Constantinople. 
 
 Do you remember that at the Berlin Conference, after all 
 was settled, the Ambassadors were chaffing each other about 
 their feastings, and Dizzy accused (I think) the Russian of 
 having overdrunk himself, to which the Russian replied, ' Ah, 
 but you have seen double too. When you left the Conference 
 you thought you saw two Bulgarias ' ? 
 
 What do you think of Gladstone's manifesto ? For myself 
 I agree with what I see written, in thinking it a public affair. 
 Of course that is from the necessities of a divided party, but 
 so it is. It sounds as if he desired now to leave the party 
 to itself as soon as he could honourably disengage himself 
 from leadership ; 4 and his position as connecting link between 
 Whig and Radical seems pretty much played out. The key- 
 note seems to be : 'Just keep the peace till I am out of your 
 way.' With regard to Ireland it seems to me that there is 
 
 4 Mr. Gladstone's address to the rity of Parliament necessaryfor the con- 
 Electors of Midlothian on September servation of that unity, is the first duty 
 18, 1885, which formed the New of every representative of the people ;' 
 Liberal Manifesto, putting aside as not but he considered that, ' subject to this 
 ripe for discussion the question of principle,' a grant of enlarged powers 
 Disestablishment, and answering Mr. to parts of the country to manage their 
 Parnell's demands by saying 'that to own affairs was a source of strength and 
 maintain the supremacy of the Crown, a benefit, 
 the unity of the Empire, and all autho-
 
 1885 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 435 
 
 no leader or party that dares to say ' such and such things 
 are necessary to restore the authority of law in Ireland, and 
 I will do them if you will let me,' A pitiful attempt to 
 humour the Irish leaders seems all that anybody now runs 
 to, as if you could out-blarney an Irishman. It is carrying 
 coals to Newcastle with a witness. Poor Lord Carnarvon 
 has certainly got his blarney thrown back in his face. 
 
 With what satisfaction after discharging oneself upon such 
 matters does one's mind recoil upon cabbages, which for a few 
 years it is given to us in Devonshire to enjoy in peace ! 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 To Sir Henry Taylor. 
 
 Blachford : March 15, 1886. 
 
 My dear Taylor, How are you ? You ought to be better 
 during the last few sunny days, if, as my gardener assures 
 me, plants under glass can endure any amount of cold outside, 
 but pine for sunshine. However, I believe this has reference 
 to putting out blossoms, which is not, I take it, your present 
 occupation. 
 
 I have been engaged in my first prosecution of a poacher. 
 I have been in the habit of keeping a keeper, with the view 
 of conforming to the usages of the country, but with a distinct 
 intimation that I did not ' preserve,' and would not prosecute. 
 This limitation of the keeper's powers, of course, got wind, 
 and enabled the great and notorious poacher of the parish, a 
 celebrated drunkard and blasphemer, but a very sharp fellow 
 even when half drunk, to be continually jeering at the lanky 
 stu'pid keeper for his inefficiency, without the risk of re- 
 ceiving the only possible answer, before the bench of 
 magistrates, of which, however, one of my labourers says, 
 ' That 'ere Jarge, he's been so often before the magistrates, 
 that he had as lief be there as anywhere else.' 
 
 Of all this triumphant jeering I used to hear continual 
 complaints, to which I turned a deaf ear, till it appeared 
 that the labourers, now some of them out of work, were 
 encouraged by his notorious and jubilant impunity to follow 
 his example along the road to ruin : so I thought it time to 
 
 F F 2
 
 436 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 favour one of the unemployed with work, and ' George ' with 
 a prosecution, which, as he has the faculty of making the 
 Justices laugh, is always a kind of ovation for him, but 
 cost him on this occasion thirty shillings say three or four 
 days' rabbiting. After keeping the audience well amused for 
 some time, his parting shot at the Board and its subordinates 
 was delivered while he was fumbling for the amount of his 
 fine and costs, which he always has forthcoming. The 
 clerk squeaked out, ' Your worships, the man has got the 
 money in his pocket,' on which George turned with severe 
 dignity and said, ' Young man, you seem to know what is in 
 my pocket much better than I know what is in yours, or wish 
 to know what is in any man's pocket but my own.' 
 
 And so he went off, virtuous all over. 
 
 When my wife, who does not half like meeting him drunk, 
 was remonstrating with him, with a courage which does her 
 credit, for not sending his son ' Bobby ' to school, he stopped 
 her with dignity, ' Madam, his name is Robert.' 
 
 I give you a full-length portrait of this man, as an 
 unimpeachable candidate for admission to your proposed 
 paradise of incorrigibles 
 
 What weather it is ! The pleasant feature here is the 
 flocks of peewits which it brings upon us. I must have seen 
 forty or fifty the other day between Blachford and Moorcross, 
 and it is pleasant to see them strutting and flapping about 
 under the drawing-room windows, and hardly taking the 
 trouble to rise and wheel round me as I walk about. It is 
 curiously pretty. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 To the Earl of Selborne. 
 
 Blachford : April 24, 1886. 
 
 My dear Selborne, Let me thank you for your admirable 
 letter to the 'Times.' I have been longing for such an ex- 
 position, which brings out the Anti-Repeal argument, not as 
 an Imperialist one, but as affecting peace and righteous- 
 ness in Ireland itself. 5 
 
 5 Mr. Gladstone's Irish Home Rule Bill was introduced on April 8.
 
 1886 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 437 
 
 Matters, to my mind, are come to such a strait that I 
 should not be much indisposed to absolute separation from 
 Ireland, if only we could conscientiously consent to it. But 
 the United Kingdom finds itself commissioned to protect 
 innocent people, in Ireland and elsewhere, against pillage, 
 murder, and so on, even though this involves the employment 
 of violence against pillagers and murderers, and I do not see 
 that it is otherwise than a disgraceful abandonment of duty 
 to transfer this duty to those who are on the side of the 
 pillagers. 
 
 If and when it is shown that we cannot, or even that the 
 governing classes in England will not, do this, I think, as at 
 present advised, I should go in for separation with all its 
 evident evils. I am afraid, in that case, I might be very 
 hard-hearted in leaving the Irish people to take the conse- 
 quences. ' Tu 1'as voulu, George Dandin.' 
 
 Does Chamberlain wish to keep the Irish Members in 
 Parliament as a resource to the Radical party there, as the 
 Scotch, in a different way, were to the Puritans in Charles I.'s 
 time ? 
 
 Yours ever, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 To Cardinal Newman. 
 
 Blachford: June n, 1888. 
 
 My dear Cardinal, Yes. Doyle has been my intimate 
 friend for sixty-one years, a year longer than we have "known 
 each other. 6 I have not seen much of him lately, but what I 
 have seen of him has been very pleasant. He had so much 
 heart. It is, no doubt, sad to see our contemporaries (and 
 juniors) pass away, not one by one, but rather by twos and 
 threes. There are not many left, though (as I count them 
 up) more than I should have thought at first sight. 
 
 I received from Church, and passed on to my sister Marian, 
 a letter telling me that you thought of calling on her ; she, 
 and my eldest sister Katherine, who is staying with her, were 
 much excited, and in an incoherent, feminine kind of way, 
 stayed in a whole afternoon for fear of missing you, though it 
 
 6 See page 4.
 
 438 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD CH. ix 
 
 was patent that you would have left town before she got the 
 notice of your having been there. 
 
 However, if at any time hereafter you should again think 
 of calling, please to give her notice. It would be very pro- 
 voking to her to miss you. 
 
 It is not so very long ago since she was writing about 
 your playing of Beethoven, and saying of one particular 
 passage in one of the Salieri duets, that, after hearing many 
 big people, she had never heard it played as you played it. 
 I almost think I remember it a few piercing notes. 
 
 There, now I think you owe her a visit. 
 
 Ever yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 I was very glad to hear so good an account of your 
 strength and spirits from Church. He seems to be in the 
 way of trouble about the St. Paul's reredos, which is very fine, 
 but certainly not ' Ultra-Protestant.' 
 
 To Lady Taylor. 
 
 Blachford : February 23, 1889. 
 
 My dear Lady Taylor, The packet of letters has arrived 
 many thanks. I have not yet opened it ; but I remember 
 that you desired to possess some of the letters. And I shall 
 look through them, in order to send you back all except those 
 (if any) which have no interest greater than that of autographs, 
 or which have special interest for myself. They will have a 
 greater and more lasting value for your children (to say nothing 
 of yourself) than for those into whose hands they may fall 
 after my death, now not a very remote period. 7 
 
 I am surprised that the success of the volumes is only 
 ' moderate.' But ' quiet and wisdom ' are not the character- 
 istics which attract just now, or seem likely to become more 
 attractive in the immediate future. 
 
 For myself I feel the attraction (of what is quiet and to 
 my mind wise) more and more. I remember Greig saying in 
 
 7 This refers to letters which Lord graphy,' published in 1885. Sir Henry 
 Blachford had returned to Sir Henry Taylor died in 1886. 
 Taylor to be used in his ' Autobio-
 
 1889 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 439 
 
 a kind of essay on possible Immortality that in his experi- 
 ence what old people longed for was repose. I certainly for 
 myself agree with him, and am almost forgetting that my 
 juniors (like your young people) are of a different mind and 
 like London. I am thinking of turning Buddhist for the sake 
 of Nirwana a dormouse for the sake of hibernation. 
 
 My sister-in-law's death was scarcely unexpected, and, of 
 course, as people approach, or pass, their threescore and ten, 
 such passings away among those dear to them must be ac- 
 cepted as only natural. But I am not sure that, though the 
 keenness of the blow is less, the deprivation is not greater 
 among the old than among the young. Gaps cannot be 
 filled up, and every death makes you feel more alone. But 
 perhaps this is not so with those who have children and 
 grandchildren. 
 
 This smells, does it not, of the octogenarian rather than 
 the septuagenarian. But somehow we seem to have been sur- 
 rounded for some time by death or threatening of it. 
 
 Our love to your party. 
 
 Yours affectionately, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 To Right Hon. W. E. Gladstone. 
 
 Blachford: May 21, 1889. 
 
 My dear Gladstone, I see by our local paper that you 
 purpose spending your Whitsun holiday in or about Devon- 
 shire. If you can pardon political defection, is there any 
 chance that you would be able to make a perch at Blachford ? 
 If you would, and could, I cannot say how much pleasure it 
 would give us. And though we have nothing to offer in the 
 way of company or sumptuous entertainment, we really have 
 some beautiful country to show. 
 
 A Devonshire river, as you possibly know, (i) rises in a 
 sponge, (2) cuts its way through peat and boulders to the 
 slope of the moor, (3) then plunges down through rocks, 
 woods, and what may be called in England waterfalls, to (4) 
 undulations of wood and meadow, till it finds salt water (5) 
 in a generally picturesque estuary. 
 
 Blachford is an old-fashioned country house of the last
 
 44Q LETTERS OF LORD BLAGHFORD CH. ix 
 
 century, imperfectly but respectably supplied with modern 
 appliances, on the river Yealm, with No. 3 behind and No. 4 
 before it, and moor in various forms and directions a couple 
 of miles from the house. 
 
 I do not know what your party is, but we can put up a 
 fair number of uncritical people. 
 
 I wish I could hope that we were likely to see you, were 
 it even for a day, though so scanty a visit would be rather a 
 slight to the scenery, of which we are not a little proud. 
 
 Ever yours sincerely, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 To Right Hon. W. E. Gladstone. 
 
 Blachford : October 16, 1889. 
 
 My dear Gladstone, Church has sent me your kind letter 
 of inquiry. At the door, the answer would be ' Much the 
 same,' but that does not tell much to a friend at a distance. 
 
 My disorder the doctors speak of confidently as ' incurable,' 
 very slow in its progress, but, apart from accident, painless, I 
 understand free from severe pain, except as to the pains of 
 weakness and the annoyance of a long struggle with approach- 
 ing death. Just at this moment I may perhaps be making a 
 step downwards. 
 
 I am capable of little or no mental or bodily effort, read- 
 ing, writing, or still less conversation, as the disorder fastens 
 on my vocal chord, and I cannot listen long without exhaus- 
 tion ; so that, humanly speaking, I am incapable of echoing 
 your kindly wish for a ' prolonged life.' 
 
 From the other point of view, my own personal correction, 
 the matter is in other hands ; I know, most merciful ones. 
 With kindest regards to your family, 
 Believe me, 
 
 Yours ever sincerely, 
 
 BLACHFORD. 
 
 Early in 1889 an illness began, from which Lord Blachford 
 never recovered, though he was not entirely confined to the 
 house until the autumn of that year.
 
 1889 IN PARLIAMENT AND AT BLACHFORD 441 
 
 Dean Church came down to see him at Blachford in 
 Septembef'when his illness had taken a turn which left little 
 real hope ; and shortly afterwards, when the doctors had an- 
 nounced that his life could not be prolonged many weeks, he 
 wrote his last letters, one of which is printed above, to his 
 three oldest friends, with whom his intimacy had begun, at 
 Eton or at Oxford, sixty years before to Mr. Gladstone, to 
 Cardinal Newman, and to Dean Church. He died on 
 November 21, followed in less than a year by Cardinal 
 Newman, and a few months later by Dean Church. 
 
 There was a touching record of the old friendship in 
 Newman's last illness a very few days before his death. In 
 bequeathing a present which Lord Blachford had brought to 
 him from Italy in 1880, he dictated a message to be sent with 
 it, saying whose gift it had been, how much the donor had 
 been to him, and how constant his regret that his friend had 
 not joined the same Church with himself : ' that of all his 
 friends Lord Blachford was the most gifted, the most talented 
 and of the most wonderful grasp of mind,' and that of all the 
 intimacies which he had formed in his Oxford life, close 
 though some of them were, ' none had approached his intimacy 
 with Lord Blachford.'
 
 INDEX 
 
 ABDUT, 
 
 ABDUL Aziz, the Sultan, 270 
 
 Abeken, Dr., 88 
 
 Aberdeen, Lord, 143 
 
 Abraham, Bishop, 137 
 
 Acland, Sir Henry, 59 
 
 Acland, Sir Thomas, 37, 42, 47, 59, 
 
 151. 347, 367, 385 
 Adam, Lady, 91 
 Adderley, Right Hon. C. (Lord Norton) 
 
 230, 243 
 
 Adelaide, Queen, at Oxford, 25 
 Afghan War, debates on, 392 
 Africa, South, affairs of, 299, 364, 365, 
 
 .376, 378, 380, 395, 405 
 Airey, Professor, 109 
 ' Alabama ' Arbitration, debate in the 
 
 House of Lords, 339 
 Albano, 84, 93 
 Allen, Mr., 139 
 Amalfi, 94 
 American Provinces, the North, Act 
 
 for the Confederation passed, 270 
 
 note ', discussions on the confedera- 
 tion of, 253, 300 
 Anderdon, Mr., 59, 93, 102 
 Angelo, Miss, 2 
 Angouleme, Duchess of, 98 
 Apennines, 318 
 ' Apologia,' extract from Newman's, 35 
 
 note 
 
 Argyll, Duke of, 342, 369 
 Arnim, Baron von, 291 
 Arnold, Dr., 28, 41 
 Artois, Comte de, 204 
 Assisi, St. Francis of, 319 ; legends, 
 
 319-321 ; Church, 319, 322 
 Auckland, Lord, Bishop of Sodor and 
 
 Man, 137 
 Australia, legislative independence of, 
 
 1 57 ! growth of, 297 ; gold found in, 
 
 145, 146 
 Autemarre, Colonel, in the Crimea, 
 
 161 
 
 Avellino, Bishop of, 94 
 Ayrton, Mr., 240, 276 
 
 BLACHFORD 
 
 BADELEY, Mr., 108, 135 
 
 Baggs, Monsignore, 74, 78 
 
 Bagot, Bishop, 105, no 
 
 Baillie, Mr., 204, 220 
 
 Baines, Bishop, 73, 80, 88 
 
 Barkley, Mr., 374 
 
 Barnard, Mr. Edward, 139 
 
 Bathurst, Mr. William, 241 
 
 Beaconsfield, Lord, 353, 374,392, 431 
 resignation, 398 note ; (see also Dis- 
 raeli, Mr.) 
 
 Belling, M. , 192 
 
 Belmore, Lord, 348, 372 
 
 Benedetti. M. , 193, 195, 203 
 
 Berlin Congress, 388 
 
 Bernard, Mr. Mountague, 118, 125, 
 165, 257, 272, 341, 343 
 
 ' Bertrams, the,' 222 
 
 Bethell, Sir R. (Lord Westbury) 229, 
 230 
 
 Bills, Ecclesiastical Titles, 141 ; New 
 Zealand, 229 ; Church (Irish), 278 
 note ; Colonial Church, 305, 347 ; 
 Abolition of Church Patronage (Scot- 
 land), 354 ; Endowed Schools Act 
 of 1869, amending the, 354 ; Public 
 Worship, 354 ; Royal Titles, 370 
 
 Binsted Wyck, 283 
 
 Birmingham, 246, 416 
 
 Biron, Princess, 93 
 
 Bismarck, Prince, 283, 286 
 
 Blachford, Lady, letters to, 339, 342, 
 349, 370, 372, 399, 4ii,4i5- 
 
 Blachford, Lord, i ; birth, I ; at Wor- 
 plesdon, I ; Eton, 2 ; fondness of 
 swimming, 3 ; at Oxford, 5 ; pupil 
 of Newman, 6 ; at Iffley, 6 ; exami- 
 nation, 8 ; secures a double first, 
 10 ; Fellow of Oriel, 14, 18 ; friend- 
 ship with Newman, 14 ; Vinerian 
 Scholar, 20 ; on the measure for 
 freeing undergraduates from subscrip- 
 tion, 21, 23 ; on Dr. Hampden's 
 Convocation, 28 ; at Hursley, 31 ; 
 interviews with French priests, 53
 
 444 
 
 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD 
 
 BLACHFORD 
 
 6 1 ; account of the flood at Lyons, 
 64 ; at Milan, 67 ; visits to Manzoni, 
 68 ; at Genoa, 70 ; Rome, 72, 326, 
 396 ; present at the institution of two 
 Cardinals, 74 ; on the Roman 
 Catholic ceremonies, 78 ; Carthusians, 
 78, 81 ; the election of the Pope, 82 ; 
 the system of retraites, 83, 95 ; on 
 Cardinal Micara, 89, 91 ; leaves 
 Rome, 92 ; tours round about Naples, 
 94 ; at Venice, 97 ; on Tintoret's 
 style, 99 ; at Innspruck, 101 ; on the 
 two systems of education in France, 
 
 101 ; the Capuchins and Jesuits, 
 
 102 ; the Redemptorists, 102 ; on 
 the election of Williams and Garbett, 
 107 ; in London, 112 ; account of 
 his work of writing articles for the 
 ' Times,' 112-116 ; appointed to the 
 post of Registrar of Joint Stock 
 Companies, 116 ; Assistant Under- 
 secretary to the Colonial Office, and 
 Emigration Commissioner, 117 ; 
 resigns his Fellowship, 117 ; starts 
 the ' Guardian,' 118 ; marriage, 120 ; 
 tour in Brittany, 120; at Landerneau, 
 120; account of a 'pardon, '121, 126 ; 
 at Guingamp, 124 ; at Quimper, 128 ; 
 at the Colonial Office, 130 ; offered 
 the appointment of Secretary of 
 Governor at Malta, 131 ; special con- 
 stable for the Chartist riots, 135 ; his 
 opinion of Lord Stanley, 143 ; of Mr. 
 Gladstone, 150 ; the Kingsbridge 
 election, 151 ; criticism of Newman's 
 letters on Universities, 163 ; of 
 'Callista' and ' Fabiola,' 164; at 
 Chambery, 1 66 ; his first view of 
 Mont Blanc, 167 ; mission to Paris 
 on the Coolie question, 170, 220 ; 
 interviews with M. de Persigny, 173, 
 177, 178 ; on the Ionian Commission 
 of Enquiry, 183 ; at the Chateau de 
 Chantilly, 185 ; interviews with 
 Prince Napoleon, 191, 193 ; dines 
 with him, 195, 197, 199; meets the 
 Comte de Bruce, 204 ; M. Mohl, 
 207 ; ball at the Hotel de Ville, 212 ; 
 interview with Lord John Russell, 
 215 ; with Chasseloup Laubat, 216- 
 219 ; appointed Under-Secretary for 
 the Colonies, 225 ; opinion of the 
 Duke of Newcastle, 225, 227 ; of 
 Mr. Cardwell, 226 ; interview with 
 Lord Palmerston, 229 ; letter to the 
 Bishop of Oxford, 234 ; on the famous 
 Giotto frescoes, 236 ; letter to Sir 
 George Grey, 237 ; to Dr. Low on 
 
 BLACKHEATH 
 
 Wirima Repa, 238, 242 ; at Clumber, 
 239 ; his New Zealand despatch, 243 ; 
 criticism of Kinglake's ' Crimea,' 
 244 ; his visit to Cardinal Newman, 
 246, 416 ; on Mr. Ward's account of 
 Newman, 249 ; letter to Miss Night- 
 ingale, 251 ; views on the method of 
 writing despatches, 253 ; on the re- 
 bellion in Jamaica, 255 ; on the 
 author of ' Ecce Homo,' 259-261 ; 
 visits to Highclere, 265, 266 ; de- 
 scription of Stowe, 268 ; letter to Lord 
 Monck, 270 ; his presentation to 
 the Sultan, 270 ; committee on mili- 
 tary matters, 273 ; on the Red River 
 insurrection, 278, 281 ; at Walmer 
 Castle, 280, 285 ; at Binsted Wyck, 
 283 ; on the war of 1870, 284 ; on 
 Pere Hyacinthe, 290 ; his resignation, 
 295 ; his account of the development 
 of Colonial self-government, 295- 
 303 ; on the emancipation of the 
 Churches, 303-305 ; account of a day 
 at Einsiedeln, 307-312 ; offer of a 
 peerage, 312 ; at Florence, 317; on 
 St. Francis of Assisi, 318-321 ; at 
 Naples, 324 ; visits to the Sermonetas, 
 329, 332 ; meets Dr. Pantaleone, 
 335 ; on the debate in the House of 
 Lords on the ' Alabama ' Arbitration, 
 339 ; on Sir Henry Taylor's ' Auto- 
 biography, '344, 364, 378 ; his speech 
 on his Colonial Church Bill, 347, 
 348 ; on the military manoeuvres, 350, 
 352 ; on his life at Blachford, 357- 
 360; literary work, 359, 361, 372, 
 376, 381, 382, 383, 388 ; at Killer- 
 ton, 366, 385 ; on the cession of 
 Gambia, 367 ; at Blackmoor, 367 ; 
 on debates in the House of Lords, 
 369, 370, 392 ; his article ' On Native 
 Policy in South Africa,' 376 ; on the 
 annexation of the Transvaal Republic, 
 380 ; on the war between Russia and 
 Turkey, 387, 389 ; on Sir Bartle 
 Frere's recall, 395 ; on Carlyle, 405 ; 
 note of a conversation with Cardinal 
 Newman, 407-409 ; account of a 
 Royal Commission, 409 ; his report 
 on Fever and Small-pox Hospitals, 
 
 410 ; on the Phcenix Park murder, 
 
 411 ; on Mr. George's ' Progress and 
 Poverty,' 414 ; at Oxford, 415 ; on 
 Aubrey de Vere's article, 418-420; 
 his objections to the Colonial Board 
 of Advice, 424-429 ; illness, 440 ; 
 death 441 
 
 Blackheath, 22
 
 INDEX 
 
 445 
 
 BLACKMOOR 
 
 Blackmoor, 367 
 
 Blakesley, Mr., 60 
 
 Blanc, Mont, 167 
 
 Blanshard, Major, 27 
 
 Bloxam, Mr., 109 
 
 Boboli Gardens, 317 
 
 Boers, the, 376, 380, 405 
 
 Bolgrad, negotiations about, 174 
 
 Bonn, conferences at, 366 note 
 
 Borghese, Princess, 78 
 
 Borrett, Mr., 10 
 
 Bossons, Glacier des, 167 
 
 Bouille, Marquis de, 206 
 
 Bouverie, Bartholomew, 4 
 
 Bowden, Mr., 30, 83 
 
 Bowring, Sir J., 162 
 
 Bradfield, 22 
 
 Bradford, Lord, 271 
 
 Brand, Mr. (Lord Hampden), 250 
 
 Bransgore, 33, 38 
 
 Brest, 121 
 
 Bretons, costumes of the, 121 
 
 Brewer, Mr. J. S., 10 
 
 Brieuc, St., 125 
 
 Bright, Right Hon. John, 197, 278 
 
 'British Critic,' 19, 48, 50, 6l note, 
 
 I 06, 362 
 
 'British Magazine,' 34 
 Brome, Adam de, 27 
 Brougham, Lord, 147 
 Browne, Bishop Harold, 366 note 
 Brownrigg, Colonel, 161 
 Bruce, Hon. J. (Lord Elgin), 12 
 Bruce, Mr. (Lord Aberdare), 276, 346 
 Bruce, Comte de, 204 
 Bruce, Lady Augusta, 203, 204, 207, 
 
 214 
 
 Bruce, Lady Frances, 204 
 Brtihl, Count, 91 
 Brunei, Mr. Isambard, 347 
 Brunnow, Baron, 287 
 Bruno, Father, 78 
 
 Buckingham, Duke of, 264, 270, 302 
 Buckinghamshire, Lady, 146 
 Budget of 1853, 150 
 Buller, Sir John, 152 
 Burdett-Coutts, Lady, 304 
 Burgon, Dean, 119 
 Burial Question, the, 379 
 Buxton, Mr. Charles, 255 
 Byron, Lord, 100 
 
 CADEILLE, Comte de, 120, 123 
 Cairns, Lord, 348, 370 ; style of his 
 
 speeches, 341 
 
 Cambridge, Duke of, 273, 274, 366 
 Canada, 232, 253, 270, 296, 300, 301 
 
 CHURCHES 
 
 Canning, Lord, 289 
 
 Canrobert, Marshal, 156 
 
 Capri, 94 
 
 Capuchins, the, 77, 102 
 
 Cardinals, institution of, 74 
 
 Cardwell, Lord, 250, 252, 263, 265, 
 301, 350; characteristics in office, 
 226 
 
 Carlisle, Lord, 147 
 
 Carlos, Don, 353 
 
 Carnarvon, Lord, 182, 214, 221, 265, 
 301, 315, 347 ; his policy in Natal, 
 and in the Transvaal, 364, 365, 
 380 ; characteristics in office, 263 
 
 Carrara, Francesca II. da, 100 
 
 Carthusians, rules of the, 78, 8 1 
 
 Cartier, Sir G. , 301 
 
 Caserta, Principessa di (Duchess of 
 Sermoneta), 333 
 
 Cathcart, Sir G., 160 
 
 Cathedral Commission, 405, 409, 429 
 
 Cawdor, Lord, 250 
 
 Cecil, Lord Robert, 230 (see Lord 
 Salisbury) 
 
 Chamberlain, Mr., 375, 398 
 
 Chambery, 166 
 
 Chambord, Comte de, 353 
 
 Chamonix, 167 
 
 Chantilly, 185 ; Chateau, 186 
 
 Chapman, Bishop, 2 
 
 Chartist Riots, 135 
 
 Chateaulin, 121, 122, 128 
 
 Chelmsford, Lord, 343 
 
 Chelsea, Lord, 185 
 
 Chester, Colonel, 413 
 
 Childers, Right Hon. H., 276 
 
 China, war with, 163 
 
 ' Christian Remembrancer,' 362 
 
 ' Christian Year,' 41 
 
 Christie, Mr., 59 
 
 Church, Dean, 55, 57, 63, 105, 109, 
 118, 122, 256, 342, 417, 420, 429, 
 434, 438, 441 ; on the friendship 
 between Cardinal Newman and Lord 
 Blachford, 16 ; ' Life and Letters 
 of,' 83, 101, 375 notes ; his reply to 
 Dean Howson's letter, 355 ; Ox- 
 ford Movement,' 362 note; his refusal 
 of the Archbishopric, 417 
 
 Letters to, 124, 133, 136, 149, 
 150, 152, 156, 157, 160, 162, 165, 
 168, 176, 180, 195, 199, 215, 217, 
 259, 260, 262, 272, 293, 355, 356, 
 360, 361, 362, 365, 366, 370, 371, 
 372, 373, 374, 375, 381, 388, 401, 
 402 
 
 Churches, emancipation of the Colo- 
 nial, 303-305, 347
 
 446 
 
 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD 
 
 CHURCHILL 
 
 Churchill, Lord Randolph, 432 
 
 Cisterna, 93 
 
 Civita Vecchia, 72 
 
 Clarendon, Lord, 147, 170, 172 
 
 Claughton, Bishop, 107 
 
 Clementine, Princess, 134 
 
 Clerk, Sir G., 80, 386 
 
 Clifford, Mr., 378 
 
 Clotilde, Princess, 204 
 
 Clumber, 240 
 
 Cobbett, Mr., 17 
 
 Cockburn, Lord Chief Justice, on Mar- 
 tial Law, 272 
 
 Colam, Mr., 432 
 
 Coleridge, Sir John, 48 
 
 Coleridge, Lord, 119, 346 
 
 Coleridge's ' Table Talk,' 418 note 
 
 Colley, Sir G., death of, at Majuba 
 Hill, 405 
 
 Collier, Sir R. , 336 ; vote of censure 
 on his appointment, 337 note 
 
 Cologne, Archbishop of, 62 
 
 Colombo, Bishop of, 2 
 
 Colonial Board of Advice, objections 
 to the, 424-429 
 
 Colonial Church Bill, 305, 347 
 
 Colonial Governor, extract from a letter 
 to a, 253 
 
 'Colonies, development of the self- 
 governing, 296-303, 426, 427 ; 
 emancipation of the Churches, 303- 
 
 30S 
 
 Colvile, Lady, 403 
 Colvile, Sir James, I, 120 ; death, 
 
 403 
 
 Colvile, Mr. Andrew, I2O 
 Colvile, Hon. Mrs., I 
 Colvile, Mrs. Eden, 282 
 Colvile, Miss C, letter to, 414 
 Colvile, Mr. Eden, Governor of the 
 
 Red River Settlement, 282 note 
 Colyar, Mr., 88 
 Compiegne, 185 
 
 Constantinople, Conference at, 374 
 Cook, Dr., 366 
 
 Coolie emigration question, 170 
 Courtney, Mr., 49 
 Courtown, Lord, 348 
 Cousin, M., 222 
 Cowley, Lady, 185 
 Cowley, Lord, 185, 188, 214, 287 
 Cowper, Lord, 398 
 Cranbrook, Lord, 257 note, 392, 409 
 Crimean War, 151, 156, 218 ; stories of 
 
 the, 158, 160, 161 
 Croix, Sainte, 126 
 Crozon, 128 
 Cullen, Archbishop, 249 
 
 EVANS 
 
 ' DAILY NEWS,' 119 
 
 Dalgairns, Mr., 250 
 
 Dalhousie, Lord, 117 
 
 Dalrymple, Sir C., 409 
 
 Daman, Professor, 48, 105 
 
 Dante and Giotto, 236 
 
 Davenport, Mr., 49 
 
 Davy, Lady, 76 
 
 Deare, Colonel, I 
 
 Delhi, siege of, 168 
 
 Denison, Archdeacon, 35, 165 
 
 Denison, Bishop, 47 
 
 Denison, Mr. Henry, 6, 56 
 
 Denison, Mr. J. E. (Lord Ossington), 
 
 239 
 
 Denman, Lord, 340 
 Denton, Mr. 374 
 
 Derby, Lord (the I4th), 241, 263, 271 
 Derby, Lord (the isth), 340, 392, 405, 
 
 (see also Stanley, Lord) 
 Despatches, suggestions for writing, 
 
 253 
 
 Dilke, Sir C, 398 
 Disraeli, Mr., 162, 266; his ' Home 
 
 Letters,' 431 (see also Beaconsfield, 
 
 Lord) 
 
 Disraeli, Mrs., 267 
 Dodsworth, Mr., 43, 139, 141 
 Dollinger, Dr. von, 104, 366 note 
 Domesday Book, mistakes in the, 372 
 Donkin, Professor, 109 
 Dornford, Mr., 27 
 ' Dorothy,' 160 
 Doyle, Sir Francis, 4, 10, 26, 275, 289, 
 
 437 
 
 Duelling, 115 
 Dunkellin, Lord, 263 
 Durant, Mr., 151 
 
 ' ECCE HOMO,' 259, 260, 261 
 
 ' Ecclesiastical Courts,' report on, 420 
 
 ' Ecclesiastical Titles Bill,' 141 note 
 
 Egerton, Mr., 276 
 
 Einsiedeln, ceremony at, 307-312 
 
 Elgin, Lady, 199, 205, 214 
 
 Elgin, Lord, 204 
 
 Ellenborough, Lord, 289 
 
 Elliot, Sir Thomas, 131, 134, 226 
 
 Elphinstone, Sir Mountstuart, 430 
 
 Elvey, Sir George, 59 
 
 Emigrants, Irish workhouse girls, 136 
 
 Emigration Office, 117 
 
 Encombe, Lord, 30 
 
 Eton, 2, 138 
 
 Eton and Harrow cricket match, 251 
 
 ' Eton Miscellany,' 4 
 
 Evans, Mr. A. J., 374
 
 INDEX 
 
 447 
 
 EXHIBITION 
 
 Exhibition of 1851, buildings, 142; 
 
 opening, 145 
 Eyre, Mr., Governor of Jamaica, 255, 
 
 2 S 8 
 
 FABER, Mr., 250 
 Favre, M., 283, 292 
 Fiesole, 317 
 
 * Fire Annihilator Company,' demon- 
 stration, 140 
 Fish, Mr. Secretary, 342 
 Fitzroy, Sir C., 145 
 Florence, 317 
 Follett, Mr., 61 
 Forster, Right Hon. W. E., 258, 276, 
 
 398, 402, 404 
 Fort Garry, 282 note 
 Fortescue, Lord, 392 
 Fortescue, Mr. Chichester (Lord Car- 
 
 lingford), his interview with Lord 
 
 Palmerston, 229 
 France, the two systems of education 
 
 in, 101 
 
 Franks, Mrs., letter to, 307 
 Franzoni, Cardinal, 8l 
 Frascati, 334 
 Frazer River, 282 note 
 Frere, Sir Bartle, 394 
 Freshwater, 32, 35 
 Fresne, M. de, 220 
 Froude, Mr. Hurrell, 5, 15, 16, 24, 25, 
 
 26 ; his ' Remains,' 43, 48 
 Froude, Mr. J. A., 48, 364 ; his 
 
 article on South African policy, 376 
 Froude, Mr. William, 144, 293, 373 
 Fuad Pasha, the Grand Vizier, 270 
 Fulford , Primate of Canada, 304 
 Fullerton, Lady Georgina, 285 
 Fullerton, Mr., 285 
 
 GAISFORD, Dean, 25 
 
 Gallipoli, 155 
 
 Gambetta, M., 289 
 
 Gambia, cession of, 367 note 
 
 Garbett, Archdeacon, 107 
 
 Genoa, 70 
 
 George, Mr. Henry, ' Progress and 
 Poverty,' 414 
 
 Gifford, Lord, 93 
 
 Gilbert, Dr., 107 
 
 Giotto, the frescoes of, 236 
 
 Giustiniani, Cardinal, 95 
 
 Gladstone, Rt. Hon. W. E. , 4, 17, 22, 
 , no, 117, 133, 158, 257, 412 ; 
 ' Church and State,' 50 ; his Budget 
 of 1853, 150 ; mission to the Ionian 
 Islands, 182 ; Prime Minister, 275, 
 
 HARRISON 
 
 398 note ; his Irish University Bill, 
 347 ; opposition to various Bills, 354 ; 
 retirement, 361 note ; his manifesto 
 of 1885, 434 
 
 Letters to, 159, 259, 261, 276, 312, 
 
 375. 439, 440 
 Glover, Mr., 28 
 Goldsmid, Mr. Nathaniel, 52 
 Gordon, General, 431 
 Gorham, Mr., 138 note 
 Goulburn, Dr., 134, 249 
 Graham, Sir J., 143, 266, 267 
 Grammont, Due de, 286 
 Grant, Sir Hope, 273 
 Granville, Lady, 280 
 Granville, Lord, 153, 275, 278, 280, 
 
 282, 286, 287, 331, 337, 34.8, 373. 
 
 398 ; on the ' Alabama ' Arbitration, 
 
 339 ; characteristics in office, 264 
 Gray, Dr. Asa, 366 ; ' Darwiniana,' 
 
 38i 
 
 Gray, Bishop, 304 
 Gregory XVI., Pope, 74, 96 
 Gregory, Colonel and Mrs. Sherwin, 
 
 239 
 
 Greville, Mr. Charles, 241 
 
 Grey, Lord, 134, 183, 297, 392, 424 ; 
 his offer to appoint Lord Blachford 
 Secretary of Governor at Malta, 
 1 3 1 ; on the ' Alabama ' Arbitration, 
 
 339 
 
 Grey, Sir George, 156 ; letter to, 237 
 Grossi, author of ' Visconti,' 69, 71 
 ' Guardian,' extract from the, 16 ; the 
 
 work of starting the, 118, 359, 363 
 Guingamp, 124 
 Guisot, M., 136 
 Gulden, Mdlle., 285 
 Gully, Mr., 17 
 
 HADDAN, Mr. Thomas, 118 
 
 Halifax, Lord, 112, 369, 392 
 
 Hallam, Arthur, 3 
 
 Hamilton, Bishop, 57 
 
 Hampden, Dr., 21 note; appointed 
 Regius Professor of Divinity, 28 
 note ; Bishop of Hereford, 133 note 
 
 Hanmer, Lord, 4 
 
 Hansard and Stockdale case, 6 1 
 
 Hansell, Mr., 152 
 
 Harding, Mr., 24 
 
 Harding, Sir J. Dorney, 163 
 
 Hardinge, Lord, 156 
 
 Hardy, Mr. Gathorne (Lord Cran- 
 brook), 257 
 
 Harrison, Mr. B., 26 
 
 Harrison, Sir E. , 346
 
 448 
 
 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD 
 
 HARRISON 
 
 Harrison, Mr. Frederic, 378 
 Harrow and Eton cricket match, 251 
 Harrowby, Lord, 12 
 Hartington, Lord, leader of the Liberal 
 
 party, 361 note 
 Hassan, Prince, 289 
 Haussonville, Count de, 288 
 Havelock, General, 1 68 
 Hawtrey, Dr. , 20 note 
 Head, Sir E., 228, 232 
 Heathcote, Sir William, 34, 35, 257 
 
 note 
 
 Heaviside, Anthony, 4 
 Helps' 'Conquest of America,' 166 
 Henri V., 98 (see Chambord, Comte 
 
 de) 
 
 Herbert, Hon. Auberon, 265, 267 
 Herbert, Mr. Edward, 266, 267, 364 
 Highclerc, 265, 266 
 Hoare, Archdeacon, 41, 46 
 Hodgson, Provost, 20 note 
 Hohentahl, Count and Countess, 93 
 Holland, Sir Henry (Lord Knutsford), 
 
 264 
 
 Holwegg, M. Bethmann, 90 
 Hooker, Sir Joseph, 268 note 
 Hope, Mr. G., 221 
 Hope Scott, Mr. James, 42, 57, 63, 
 
 68 ; illness, 373 
 Howe, Lord, 25 
 
 Howe, Mr., and Nova Scotia, 300, 301 
 Howick, Lord, 233 
 Howson, Dean, 355 note 
 Huelgoat, 126 
 Hursley, 32, 38 
 Hurstpierpoint School, 243 
 Huyse, Dr., 88 
 Hyacinthe, Pere, 290 
 
 IFFLEY, 6 
 
 Ignatieff, 374 
 
 Imhausen, M., 231 
 
 Imola diocese, 95 
 
 Inglis, SirR., 41, 47, 50, 353 
 
 Inglis, Colonel, 168 
 
 Ionian Islands, 182 
 
 Ireland, 362, 404, 410, 411, 412, 
 
 435. 437 
 
 Irving, Sir Henry, 399 
 Isandlwana, disaster at, 393 note 
 Itri, 94 
 
 JAMAICA, rebellion in, 255, 256, 258, 
 
 260 
 James, Sir Walter (Lord Northbourne), 
 
 281 
 
 LIBRARY 
 
 James, Mr. Walter, 409 
 
 Jelf, Mr., 108 
 
 Jenner, Sir H., 138 
 
 Jermyn, Frais, 4 
 
 Jesuits, the, 77, 102 
 
 John, St., Lateran Church, relics in, 
 
 76 
 Johnson, Dean of Wells, 11, 56 
 
 KEATE, Dr., 3 
 
 Keble, Rev. J., 19, 26, 32, 34, 36, 41, 
 
 63, 109, 137, 141, 158, 165 ; his 
 
 ' Life of Dr. Thomas Wilson,' 137 
 
 note ; ' Essays, ' 363 
 Keble, Mrs. , 36, 37, 58 
 Kennaway, Sir John, 151 
 Kennington Common, Chartist meeting 
 
 at, 135 
 
 Kerr, Lord Henry, 247 
 Killerton, 366, 385 
 Kimberley, Lord, 299, 340, 347 
 King, Mr. Bryan, 223 
 Kinglake, his ' Crimea,' 244 
 Kingsbridge election, 151 
 Knight, Miss, 329 note 
 Knutsford, Lord, 264 note 
 Kuserow, Count, 285, 287 
 
 LA FORET, 1 20 
 
 Lablache, 35 
 
 Labouchere, Mr. (Lord Taunton) 172, 
 
 177 
 
 Lake, Dean, 149 
 Landerneau, 120 
 Landevenue, 128 
 Lansdowne, Lord, 144 
 Latrobe, Governor of Victoria, 146 
 Laubat, M. de Chasseloup, 172, 215; 
 
 interview with Lord Blachford, 217- 
 
 219 
 
 Lawrence, Lord, 392, 394 
 Layard, Sir Henry, 158 
 Le Boeuf, Marshal, 286 
 Le Faou, 126 
 Lear, Mr., 100 
 
 Lefevre, Sir John Shaw, 117, 124 
 Legge, Hon. and Rev. Henry, 43 
 Legge, Hon. Mrs. Henry, letters to, 
 
 126, 197, 236, 318, 328, 350 
 Leghorn, 72 
 Leinster, Duke of, 147 
 Leti, 383 ; ' Life of Sixtus V,' 384 
 
 note 
 
 Lewis, Sir G. C. , 223 
 ' Library of Fathers, translated by 
 
 members of the English Church,' 
 
 41 note
 
 INDEX 
 
 449 
 
 LIDDELL 
 
 Liddell, Dean, 26 
 
 Liddon, Canon, 289 
 
 Lindsay, Colonel Loyd (Lord Wan- 
 stead), 288 
 
 Littlemore, consecration of the Church 
 at, 38 
 
 London, Bishop of, 57 
 
 Lord Mayor, 342 
 
 Lords, House of, its value, 313, 401, 
 402 ; debates in, 143, 339, 342, 347, 
 
 349, 367, 370, 372, 392, 405 
 Louis Napoleon, Emperor, 175, 196, 
 
 198, 2 1 6, 218 ; his letter to Prince 
 
 Napoleon, 184 
 Louis Philippe, 134 
 Low, Dr. , letters to, 238, 242 
 Lowder, Rev. Charles, 224 
 Lowe, Right Hon. R., 347 
 Lucknow, 1 68 
 Lyndhurst, Lord, 147 
 Lyons, Lord, 283 
 Lyons, floods at, 64 
 ' Lyra Apostolica,' 18, 31 
 Lysons, Colonel, 232 
 Lyttelton, Lord, 147 
 Lytton, Sir Edward Bulwer, 182, 184, 
 2OI, 213 
 
 MACARTHY, Sir Charles, 222 
 Macdonald, Sir John, 253, 300 
 Macdonald, Mr., Reginald Somerled, 
 
 278 
 
 Mackarness, 119 
 Mackenzie, Colonel, 351 
 Magee, Bishop, 277 
 Maggiore, Lago, 316 
 Majuba Hill, battle of, 405 
 Malais, Abbe, 124 
 Malakhoff, Duke of, 268 
 Malmesbury, Lord, 184, 185, 196, 202, 
 
 341 
 
 Malo, St., 124 
 Man, Isle of, 47 
 Manning, Cardinal, 42, 46, 141, 250, 
 
 362 
 
 Manoeuvres, military, 350, 352 
 Mansel, Dean, 265 
 Manzoni, visits to, 67 
 Maories, their reception at Osborne, 
 
 246 
 
 Marie Antoinette, 205 
 Marindin, Miss E., letter to, 307 
 Marindin, Mr. G. E., letter to, 388 
 Marriott, Mr., 17, 1 8 
 Martial Law, 272 
 Mason, Mr., 232 
 Mattei, Cardinal, 335 
 
 NEW 
 
 Maudslay's engineering works, 145 
 
 Maurice, Mr. F. D., 42 
 
 Maynard, M. , 126 
 
 Mayne, Sir H., 343 
 
 Mayotta Island, 172 
 
 Mayow, Colonel George, 160 
 
 McMahon, Marshal, 195 
 
 Melbourne, Lord, anecdote of, 233 
 
 Melville, Mr. Leslie, 85 
 
 Mer de Glace, 167 
 
 Merivale, Mr. Herman, 202, 225, 279 
 
 Merode, Count, 51 
 
 Mezzofanti, Cardinal 82, 91 
 
 Micara, Cardinal Bishop of Frascati, 
 
 77, 81, 89, 91 
 Milan, 67, 236 
 Milnes, Monckton (Lord Houghton), 
 
 48 
 
 Mmghetti, Signer, 333 
 Miniato, St., 317 
 Minto, Lady, 382, 410 
 Minto, Lord, 410 
 Mitchell, Sir John, 282 
 Moberly, Bishop, 26, 165, 346, 372 
 Mohl, M. , 207 ; his anecdotes, 208- 
 
 211 
 
 Mola di Gaeta, 94 
 
 Monck, Lord, letter to, 270 
 
 Monsell, Mr., 278, 283 
 
 Montagu, Philip, 4 
 
 Montalembert, Comte de, 189 
 
 Monteagle, Lord, 401, 402 
 
 Moorcross, 405 
 
 Morpeth, Lord, 50 
 
 Morris, Rev. J., 109 
 
 Moulins, 64 
 
 Mozley, Mr James, 50 note, 63, 109, 
 118, 138, 141, 149, 252 ; Regius Pro- 
 fessor of Divinity, 292 ; editor of the 
 ' Christian Remembrancer,' 362 ; 
 letter to, 134 
 
 Mozley, Mr. John, 373 
 
 Mozley, Mr. Thomas, 26 
 
 Mozley, Mrs. John, 396 
 
 Murdoch, Mr., 117, 131 
 
 NAPLES, 94, 324 
 
 Napoleon, Prince, 188, 191, 193, 197, 
 
 198 ; receives Sir F. Rogers, 190, 
 
 193 ; his marriage, 200, 214 
 Napoleon I., 206 
 Napoleon III., 175, 184, 196, 198, 
 
 216, 218 
 
 Nemours, Duke of, 134 
 New Brunswick, 300 
 New South Wales, gold in, 145 ; 
 
 population, 297 
 
 G G
 
 45 
 
 LETTERS OF LORI) BLACHFORD 
 
 NEW 
 
 New Zealand, 156, 223, 227, 229, 
 243, 297, 298 ; church in, 303 
 
 Newcastle, Duke of, 147, 215, 227, 
 304 ; characteristics in office, 225 
 
 Newman, Cardinal, 5 ; his character- | 
 istics, 14 ; ' Letters and Correspond- ; 
 ence of,' 18, 31, 43, 45, 50, 52, 55, | 
 56, 87 notes ; ' Apologia,' 46 note ; 
 extracts from letters to Keble, 47 ; 
 to James Mozley, 50 notes ; joins j 
 the Church of Rome, 1 18 ; his letters 
 on Universities, 163 ; ' Fabiola,' 
 164 ; visits from Lord Blachford, 
 246, 416 ; his ' Faith and Reason,' 
 250 ; preface to Keble's ' Essays,' 
 363 ; note of a conversation with 
 Lord Blachford, 407-409 
 
 Letters to, 17, 18, 22, 26, 30, 33, 
 34, 39, 40, 42, 43, 45, 46, 48, 49, 
 50. Si, 53. 55. 6o> 61, 83, 87, 94, 
 101, 106, 1 10, 275, 363, 395, 396, 
 417, 421, 422, 423, 437 
 
 Nightingale, Miss Florence, letter to, 
 251 
 
 ' Nineteenth Century,' 378 
 
 North brook, Lord, 392 
 
 Northcote, Sir Stafford, 119, 142, 
 341 note, 351, 385 ; at Kings- 
 bridge, 151 
 
 Nossibe island, 172 
 
 Nova Scotia, 300 
 
 ' Numencia ' the insurgent frigate, 353 
 
 O'CONNOR, Feargus, 135 
 
 O'F., Mr. 147 
 
 Oakeley, Sir H., 57, 63, 109, 346 
 
 Oliphant, Laurence, 282 
 
 Omar Pasha, 156 
 
 Orford, Lord, 328 
 
 Oriel College, pictures at, 416 
 
 Orioli, Cardinal, 103 
 
 Orsini, 179 note 
 
 Overbeck, 75 
 
 Oxford, 5 ; undergraduates, question 
 of releasing candidates for matricu- 
 lation from subscription to the thirty- 
 nine articles, 21, 23 notes (see 
 Universities) 
 
 Oxford, Bishop of, letter to, 234 
 
 'Oxford Movement,' The, 16, 21, 23, 
 28 notes 
 
 PADUA, frescoes at, 236 
 Paestum, 94 
 Paget, Sir A., 326 
 
 RANKE 
 
 Paget, Sir James, 309, 364 
 
 Paget, Dean, 420 
 
 Pakington, Sir J., 230, 274 
 
 Palmer, Mr. William, 57, 108, 326, 
 
 362 
 Palmer, Sir Roundell, 284, 304, (see 
 
 also Selborne, Lord) 
 Palmerston, Lord, 163 note, 165, 170, 
 
 181, 229, 250; his 'Conspiracy to 
 
 Murder Bill,' 179, 201 notes 
 Pantaleone, Dr., 334 
 ' Pardon,' account of a, 121, 126 
 Paris, the Bourse, 200 ; Hotel de Ville, 
 
 212 
 
 Patrizzi, Cardinal, 81 
 
 Patteson, Bishop, 243 
 
 Paul, Mrs., \6onote 
 
 Pavia, 70 
 
 Peacock, Sir Barnes, 342 
 
 Peel, Sir Robert, 47, 61, 113 ; resigna- 
 tion, 131 note 
 
 Peel, General, 264 
 
 Pelissier, General, 158 
 
 Pentini, 83, 95 
 
 Persigny, M. de, 171 ; his interviews 
 with Sir F. Rogers, 173, 177, 178, 
 191 
 
 Perugia, 318 
 
 Peruzzi, Signer, 332 
 
 Pfyffer, Mr., 77, 8l 
 
 Phillimore, Sir R., 304 
 
 Phillpotts, Bishop, 137 note 
 
 Phoenix Park, murders in, 411 
 
 Pickering, Mr., 138 
 
 Pinturicchio, 73 
 
 Pisani, M. Ferri, 190, 192 
 
 Polehampton, Mr., I 
 
 Pomarets, Mdlle. des, 220 
 
 Pompeii, 94, 324 
 
 Pont Charlan, 64 
 
 Pope, the, 140 note ; election of the, 
 82, 407 ; his miracles, 330 
 
 Portsmouth, Lord, 385, 392 
 
 Potemkin, Madame, 76, 87 
 
 Prevost, Sir G. , 63 
 
 Price, Professor Bonamy, 165 
 
 Prussia, King of, 283 
 
 Pusey, Dr. E. B., 22 note, 42, 63, 
 1 06 
 
 Pusey, Mr. P., 17, 22 
 
 QUIMPER, 128 
 
 RAGLAN, Lord, 153, 155 
 
 Ranke's ' History of the Popes,' 384
 
 INDEX 
 
 RAWLINSON 
 
 Rawlinson, Mr., 149 
 
 Red River Settlement, insurrection in, j 
 
 278 
 
 ' Redemptorists ' order, 102 
 Reeve, Mr. Henry, 239, 241, 376, i 
 
 iCC 
 
 300 
 
 Reform Bill, 12 note 
 
 Registration of Joint Stock Companies, 
 116 
 
 Retraces, system of, 83, 95 
 
 Reumont, M. , 91 
 
 Reunion, a delegate from, 231 
 
 Rhone, rising of the, 65 
 
 Rice, David ap, 4 
 
 Richmond, Duke of, 347 
 
 Richmond, Mr. George, 72, 85, 221 
 
 Rickards, Sir George, 284, 415 
 
 Riel, Louis, 281 
 
 Ripon, Lord, 340, 341, 398 
 
 Ritualism, 224, 335, 336, 375, 376 
 
 Rivington, Mr., 31 note, 48 
 
 Robinson, Mr. Crabbe, 115 
 
 Rogers, Rev. Edward, I, 14, 49 ; 'The 
 Life and Opinions of a Fifth Mon- 
 archy Man,' &c., 256 ; letters to, 
 19, 64, 137, 147, 212, 229, 242, 
 255. 256, 317, 334, 346, 347 
 
 Rogers, Miss Emily, letter to, 38 
 
 Rogers, Frederic, I (see Blachford) 
 
 Rogers, Sir Frederick Leman, resigns 
 his post in the Audit Office, 120; 
 letters to, 12, 92 
 
 Rogers, Colonel Henry, 58, 162 
 
 Rogers, Sir John, I ; death, 120 
 
 Rogers, John, ' The Life and Opinions 
 of,' 256 note 
 
 Rogers, Miss Kate, letters to, 20, 23, 
 24, 48, 63, 76, 90, 130, 139, 140, 
 143, 144, 145, 146, 154, 164, 182, 
 
 184, 185, 190, 204, 213, 222, 226, 
 
 232, 243, 247, 250, 252, 258, 268, 
 280, 28l, 283, 292, 294, 321, 324, 
 
 326, 337. 368, 385, 392. 
 
 Rogers, Miss Marian, letters to, 6, 28, 
 31, 56, 80 (see Legge, Mrs. H. ) 
 
 Rogers, Miss S., letters to, 35, 58, 70, 
 105, 106, 108, 120, 173, 196, 207, 
 27S/332 
 
 Rogers, General, 169 
 
 Rogers, Mrs. (Lady Rogers), letters to, 
 8, 10, n, 37, 72, 85, 97, 124, 131, 
 133, 135. iSi. 158, 166, 172, 178, 
 r 79> l*3> X 85, ! 87, 189, 192, 201, 
 203, 220, 221, 227, 228, 229, 231, 
 
 233, 239, 240, 245, 246, 252, 257, 
 265, 266, 269, 270, 273, 277, 278, 
 283, 284, 285, 289, 290 
 
 Rohan, Cardinal de, arrest of, 206 
 
 SHADWELL 
 
 ' Romanism and Popular Protestantism,' 
 41 note 
 
 Rome, 72, 326 ; changes at, 396 ; 
 Roman Catholic services in, 78 ; the 
 diplomatic tribune, 333 
 
 Rose, Archdeacon, 41 
 
 Rosebery, Lord, 341, 368, 370 
 
 Rosmini, 70 
 
 Ross, Sir Hew, 155, 156 
 
 Rothschild, 153 
 
 Rouen, 53 
 
 Round, Mr., 133 
 
 Ruskin, Mr., 73, 98 
 
 Russell, Lord John (Lord Russell), 131 
 note, 143, 263 ; appoints Dr. Hamp- 
 den to the See of Hereford, 133 note ; 
 on the Papal usurpation, 141 note ; 
 his Reform Bill, 153 ; interview with 
 Lord Blachford, 215 ; on the ' Ala- 
 bama ' Arbitration, 339 
 
 Russia, war with Turkey, 387, 389 
 
 Russia, Czar of, 155, 156, 162 
 
 Ryder, Mr., 24, 109 
 
 SADOWA, battle of, 265 note 
 
 Salerno, 94 
 
 Salisbury, Lord, 264, 268, 278, 340, 
 
 369, 373,431 ; on Lord Shaftesbury's 
 
 Bill, 350 
 Sallenches, 167 
 Sandford, Lord, 276 
 Saone, rising of the, 65 
 Sargent, Mr., 18 
 Sargent Mrs., 33 
 
 Schleswig-Holstein, Prince of, 195 
 Schwytz, canton of, 307 
 Scott, Sir Walter, 329 note 
 Scott, murder of, by Riel, 281 
 Seaton, Lord, 153, 183 
 Seeley, Sir John, ' Ecce Homo,' 261 
 
 note 
 Selborne, Lord, 57 note, 337, 370, 373 ; 
 
 his schemes of Land Reform, 346 ; on 
 
 Lord Shaftesbury's Bill, 350 
 
 Letters to, 386, 436 
 Sellon, Miss, 137 
 Selwyn, Bishop of New Zealand, 3, 157, 
 
 33 
 Sermoneta, Duke and Duchess of, 326, 
 
 329, 332 
 
 Serpents, Isle of, 174 note 
 Severne, Mr., 323 
 Seward, Mr., 232 
 Sewell, Professor, 83 
 Seymour, Sir H., 153, 155 
 Shadwell, Mr., 53
 
 452 
 
 LETTERS OF LORD BLACHFORD 
 
 SHAFTESBURY 
 
 Shaft esbury, Lord, 165 ; his bill to pre- 
 vent frauds in charitable funds, 349 
 
 Sharp, Mr. Martin, 119, 156, 381 
 
 Shepstone, Sir T. , 380 note 
 
 Sibthorpe, Mr., 109 
 
 Siga, Bishop of, 73 ' 
 
 Skinner, Major, 265 
 
 Slidell, Mr., 232 
 
 Smith, General, 351 
 
 Somerset, Duke of, 340, 392 
 
 Somerville, Mrs., 91 
 
 Southey, 41 
 
 Spedding, Dr. James, 60 
 
 Stanley, Dean, 96, 204 note, 290, 385 
 
 Stanley, Lord, 143, 199, 201 (see also 
 Derby, Lord) 
 
 Stanley, Lord, of Alderley, 349 
 
 Stansfeld, Right Hon. J., 276 
 
 Staveley, Sir C, 351 
 
 Stephen, Sir James, 51, 1 30 
 
 Stockdale, Mr., 61 note 
 
 Storks, Sir Henry, 265, 269, 273, 351 
 
 Stowe, 268 
 
 Straits Settlements garrison, committee 
 on, 273 
 
 Stratford de Redcliffe, Lord, 171 
 
 Strossmayer, Bishop, 291 
 
 Stubbs, Dr. (Bishop of Oxford), 421 
 
 Suez Canal shares, 365 
 
 Sumner, Mr. , 339 note 
 
 Sydney, Lord, 393 
 
 Symonds, Mr., 124 
 
 TADDEI, Rosa, 103 
 
 Tait, Archbishop, 279, 348, 409 
 
 Talbot, Dr. (Bishop of Rochester), 289, 
 
 407 
 
 Tarracina, 93 
 Taunton, Lord, 173 note 
 Taylor, Lady, letters to, 432, 438 
 Taylor, Sir Henry, 130 note, 233 ; his 
 autobiography, 344, 364, 378 ; article 
 on Carlyle, 405 ; death, 438 note 
 
 Letters to, 271, 314, 316, 337, 
 344, 35 2 , 354, 356, 357, 363, 364, 
 365, 367, 376, 377, 378, 380, 381, 
 383, 384, 386, 393, 394, 395, 396, 
 398, 400, 402, 403, 405, 409, 410, 
 412, 418, 420, 423, 429, 430, 433, 
 
 435 
 
 Terry, Miss, 399 
 Thesiger, Sir F. (Lord Chelmsford), 
 
 1 68 
 
 Thevenot, M. , 97 
 Thiers, M., 222 
 Tliomas, Mr. Vaughan, 29 
 Thompson, Archbishop, 348 
 
 WARBURTON 
 
 Thornton, Sir E., 341 note 
 
 Thornton, Mr., 41 
 
 ' Times,' the work of writing articles for 
 
 the, 112-116 
 Tintoret, 99 
 
 Tooth, Mr., prosecution of, 375 note 
 Torrens, General, 160 
 Townsend, Mr., 41 
 Tract XC. 63, 96 note, 103, 105 
 Transvaal Republic, annexation of, 
 
 380 ; affairs of, 376,405 
 Tremlett, Captain, 237 
 Trench, Archbishop, 48 
 Trevor, Mr., 30 
 Trieux, 125 
 
 Trochu, General, 283, 292 
 Turin, 316 
 
 Turkey, war with Russia, 387, 389 ; 
 Turkish Question, the, and Turkish 
 
 misgovernment, 366, 373, 374, 377, 
 
 379, 387, 391, 40i, 434 
 Twisleton, Mr., 35, 42 
 Tyrolese, the, 102 
 
 UGINE, 166 
 
 Umbria, plains of, 318 
 
 Uniformity, Act of, of 1662, 362 
 
 United States, 228 
 
 Universities and the Church, 21, 22, 
 
 23, 28, 44, 107, 155, 158, 272 
 University of Oxford election in 1865, 
 
 257 
 Utterton, Mr., 48 
 
 VANCOUVER Island, 282 note 
 
 Vaughan, Mr., 26, 42 
 
 Venables, Mr., 239, 241 
 
 Venice, 97, 236 
 
 Vera, Signer, 329 
 
 Verdon, Sir George, 266, 267 
 
 Vere, Mr. Aubrey de, 141 ; his article 
 
 on ' Subjective Difficulties in 
 
 Religion,' 418 
 Verona, 102 
 
 Vesuvius, eruption of, 325 
 Victor Emmanuel, 323 
 Vitali, Ambrogio, 67 
 Vyvyan, Sir R., 17 
 
 WALEWSKI, 188, 189 
 
 Wallace's ' Russia,' 377 
 
 Walmer Castle, 280 
 
 Walter, Mr. John, 22 note, 112, 120, 
 
 373 
 Warburton, Dr., 50
 
 INDEX 
 
 453 
 
 WARD 
 
 Ward, Mr., 44, 63, 109; his account 
 of Newman, 249 
 
 Washington, Treaty of, 339, 341 
 notes, 346 
 
 Waterton, Mr., 85, 96 
 
 Watson, Mr., 72 
 
 Weedall, Dr., 103 
 
 Wellington, Duke of, 12, 21, 25, 135 
 
 Wendischmann, Dr., 104 
 
 Westbury, Lord, 337, 341 
 
 Westmacott, Mr., 50 
 
 Wetherall, Mr., 285 
 
 Wharncliffe, Lord, 12 
 
 Wickham, Mr., 283 
 
 Wight, Isle of, 39 
 
 Wilberforce, Mr. H., 18, 24, 32, 33 
 note, 38, 53, 139 
 
 Wilberforce, Mr. Robert, 5, 32, 33 
 
 Wilberforce, Bishop Samuel, 26, 32, 
 36, 41, 42 
 
 Wilberforce, Mrs., 37 
 
 Wilkes, Captain, 232 note 
 
 Williams, Mr. Isaac, 28, 39 ; oppo- 
 sition to his election to the Professor- 
 ship of Poetry, 107 
 
 Wilson, Bishop, 137 
 
 Wilson, Mr., 18, 24, 27, 32, 37, 48, 
 54, 57 
 
 YOUNG 
 
 Winchester, Bishop of, 109, 348 
 Windham, Colonel, in the Crimea, 
 
 1 60 
 Wirima Repa, 237 ; illness, 242, 248 ; 
 
 his visit to Osborne, 245 ; death, 
 
 248 note 
 Wiseman, Cardinal, 45, 56 note, 141, 
 
 250 ; his 'Callista,' 164 
 Wodehouse, Sir P., 299 
 Wolfe, 221 
 
 Wolseley, Lord, 281 note 
 Wood, Colonel, 160 
 Wood, Mr. A., 131, 134, 154, 158 
 Wood, Mr. Page (Lord Hatherley) 276 
 Wood, Mr. S., 30, 42, 43, 45, 49, 50, 
 
 112; his account of ' Endowments, ' 
 
 60 
 
 Wootton, Dr., 9 
 Wordsworth, Bishop Christopher, 26, 
 
 366 
 
 Worplesdon, I 
 Wraxall, Sir Nathaniel, 115 
 Wynne, Mr., 141 
 
 YALPUK River, 174 note 
 Yelverton, Admiral, 352 
 Young, Sir J., 282 
 
 PRINTED BY 
 
 SPOTTISWOODE AND CO., NEW-STREET SQUAHH 
 LONDON
 
 MR. MURRAY'S LIST 
 
 OF WORKS OF 
 
 BIOGRAPHY AND MEMOIRS. 
 
 ALICE (Princess, Grand-Duchess of Hesse.) LETTERS TO H.M. 
 THE QUEEN. With a Memoir by H.R.H. PRINCESS CHRISTIAN. 
 Portrait. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. 
 
 BROOKE (Sir Victor, Bart), SPORTSMAN AND NATURALIST: His 
 
 DIARIES AND CORRESPONDENCE. With a Chapter on his researches 
 in Natural History, by Sir WILLIAM H. FLOWER, K.C.B., Director 
 of the Natural History Branch of the British Museum. Edited, with 
 a Memoir of his Life, by O. LESLIE STEPHEN. With Portrait and 
 Illustrations. Crown 8vo. 12s. 
 
 BROWNE (Edward Harold, D.D., Bishop of Ely and subsequently of 
 Winchester.) A MEMOIR, by the Very Rev. GEORGE WILLIAM KITCHIN, 
 D.D., Dean of Durham. With Portraits. 8vo. i8.r. 
 
 BUCKLAND (William, D.D., F.R.S., sometime Dean of Westminster, 
 twice President of the Geological Society, and President of the British 
 Association at Oxford in 1832.) LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE, by his 
 Daughter, Mrs. GORDON. With Portraits and Illustrations. Crown 
 8vo. I2s. 
 
 BURGHERSH'S (Lady) LETTERS FROM GERMANY AND FRANCE 
 DURING THE CAMPAIGN of 1813-14. Edited by her Daughter, 
 Lady ROSE WEIGALL. Portraits. Crown 8vo. 6s. 
 
 BUXTON (Sir T. Powell). MEMOIRS. By CHARLES BUXTON. Portrait. 
 8vo. i6s. ; or post 8vo. $s. 
 
 CLARENCE (H.R.H. the late Duke of). A MEMOIR, written with the 
 sanction of H.R.H. the Prince of Wales. By JAMES EDWARD VINCENT. 
 With Portraits and Illustrations. Crown 8vo. 9^. 
 
 CROWE (Sir Joseph A., K.C.M.G., C.B.) REMINISCENCES OF 
 THIRTY-FIVE YEARS OF MY LIFE. With Plans. 8vo. i6.r. 
 
 DARWIN'S (Charles) LIFE AND LETTERS, with an AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL 
 CHAPTER. Edited by his Son, FRANCIS DARWIN, F.R.S. Portraits. 
 3 vols. 8vo. 36.?. 
 Or Popular Edition, condensed in I vol. Crown 8vo. TS. 6d.
 
 MR. MURRAVS LIST continued. 
 
 DE ROS (Georgiana, Lady). A SKETCH OF HER LIFE: with 
 some Reminiscences of her Family and Friends, including the Duke of 
 Wellington. By her Daughter, the Hon. Mrs. SWJNTON, With Portraits 
 and Illustrations. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. 
 
 EASTLAKE (Lady). JOURNALS AND CORRESPONDENCE. Edited 
 by her Nephew, CHARLES EASTLAKE SMITH. With Facsimiles of her 
 Drawings and a Portrait. 2 vols. Crown 8vo. 2 If. 
 
 FRANKLIN (Admiral Sir John). THE LIFE: based on private and 
 hitherto unpublished documents. By H. D. TRAILI.. With Maps and 
 Portraits. 8vo, l6j. 
 
 FRERE (Sir Bartle, Bart.) THE LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE: 
 derived from hitherto unpublished documents. By JOHN MARTINEAU. 
 With Portraits, Illustrations, and Maps. 2 vols. 8vo. 32.?. 
 
 GOODWIN (Harvey, D.D., Bishop of Carlisle.) THE BIOGRAPHY. 
 By H. D. RAWNSLEV, Hon. Canon of Carlisle. With Portrait and 
 Illustrations. 8vo. l6s. 
 
 GREGORY (Sir William, K.C.M.G., formerly M.P., and sometime 
 Governor of Ceylon). An AUTOBIOGRAPHY, Edited by Lady GREGORY. 
 With Portrait. 8vo. l6s. 
 
 HEBER (Bishop) : POET AND CHIEF MISSIONARY TO THE EAST, 
 1783-1826. By GEORGE SMITH, C.I.E. With Portrait, Maps, and 
 Illustrations. Crown 8vo. icw. 6d. 
 
 LIND (Jenny), THE ARTIST, 1820-51. Her Early Art Life and Dramatic 
 Career, From original Documents, Letters, Diaries, &c. , in the possession 
 of Mr. GOLDSCHMIDT. By Canon H. SCOTT HOLLAND, M.A., and 
 W. S. ROCKSTRO. Popular Edition. With Portraits and Illustrations. 
 Crown 8vo. gs. 
 
 LYSONS (General Sir D.) EARLY REMINISCENCES. By Sir DANIEL 
 LYSONS, G.C.B., Constable of the Tower. With Illustrations. Crown 
 8vo. 95. 
 
 OWEN (Professor Richard). THE LIFE, based on his Correspondence, 
 his Diaries, and those of his Wife. By his Grandson, the Rev. RICHARD 
 OWEN. With a Chapter by the Right Hon. T. H. HUXLEY. With 
 Portraits and Illustrations. 2 vols. Crown 8vo. 241. 
 
 STANLEY (Arthur P.) LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE OF ARTHUR 
 PENRHYN STANLEY, late Dean of Westminster. By R. E. PROTHERO. 
 With Portraits and Illustrations. 2 vols. 8vo. 32^. 
 
 JOHN MURRAY, ALBEMARLE STREET.
 
 University of California 
 
 4MHBE2? 1 REGI ?NAL LIBRARY FACILITY 
 405 Hilgard Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90024-1388 
 
 Return this material to the library 
 from which it was borrowed. 
 
 UCSD LIBRARY --- SRLF 001/004 
 
 Request for BOOK 
 
 Received by 
 
 Patron _____^^_ Date. 
 
 D Acad D Staff LTGrad D Undergrad G Other 
 Daytime Phone 
 
 via LIBRARY EXPRESS 
 
 'idjL -. Lo-"J-:-- . J. M-..r"rsy, 189^ - 
 
 ^P NRLF f .- i.O^.- rj^-*i 1 = - 
 EXP SRLF -f-sr loan details. 
 
 - .... (Q 
 
 wned: ,C) UCD UCI UCLA UCR UCSB UCSC UCSF 
 
 unavailable (ptease explain) 
 
 ng fee. K necessary, will you pay for this loan?
 
 Sw^S