BBD
 
 UNIVERSITY of CALIFOKNU 
 it, ;'/;LES
 
 ELEMENTS 
 
 THEOBY OF THE NEWTONIAN POTENTIAL 
 FUNCTION, 
 
 BY 
 
 B. O. PEIRCE, PH.D., 
 
 ASSISTANT PROFESSOR OF MATHEMATICS AND PHYSICS 
 IX HARVARD UNIVERSITY. 
 
 BOSTON: 
 
 PUBLISHED BY GIXX & COMPANY. 
 1886. 
 
 105460
 
 Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1886, by 
 
 GINN & COMPANY, 
 in the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington. 
 
 J. 8. CUSHINO & Co., PRINTERS, BOSTON.
 
 T 3 
 
 PREFACE. 
 
 THIS book is almost entirely made up of lecture-notes 
 
 which from time to time during the last four years I 
 
 have written out for the use of students who have begun 
 
 I with me the study of what I have ventured to call, after 
 
 ,4 Neumann, the Newtonian Potential Function. 
 
 The notes were intended for readers somewhat familiar with 
 the principles of the Differential and Integral Calculus, but 
 unacquainted with many <tf the methods commonly used in 
 N applying Mathematics to the study of physical problems. 
 These students, I learned, found it difficult to get from any 
 single book in English a treatment of the subject at once 
 elementary enough to be within their easy comprehension, 
 %. and at the same time suited to the purposes of such of them 
 ^L as intended eventually to pursue the subject farther, or 
 wished, without necessarily making a . -\:'./?alty of Mathe- 
 matical Physics, to prepare themselves to study Experi- 
 pV mental Physics thoroughly and understandingly. "What is 
 here printed seems to have been of use to some of those 
 who have read it in manuscript, and it is hoped that it may 
 now be helpful to a larger number of students. 
 
 Since these notes are professedly elementary in character, 
 I feel that no apology is needed for what may seem to be 
 the rather prolix way in which some of the subjects are 
 treated, or for an arrangement of matter which would be
 
 IV PREFACE. 
 
 unsuitable in a book intended for a different class of readers. 
 I have not hesitated to use a long proof whenever this has 
 seemed to me more easily comprehensible than a short and 
 mathematically neater one, and I have often given more than 
 one demonstration of a single theorem in order to illustrate 
 different methods of work. Although I have used freely 
 the notation * of the Calculus, I have assumed on the part 
 of the reader only an elementary knowledge of its principles. 
 
 The short treatment of Electrostatics in Chapter v. is in- 
 troduced to show how the theorems of the preceding chapters 
 may be used in solving physical problems ; but it is hoped that 
 a person who has mastered even the little here given will be 
 able to understand, with the aid of some good treatise on 
 Experimental Ph}"sics, most of the phenomena of Electro- 
 statics. It is also hoped that those readers who mean to study 
 the subject of Electricity from the mathematical point of 
 
 * In this book the change made in a function u by giving to the 
 independent variable x the arbitrary, finite increment AT, and keeping the 
 other independent variables, if there are any, unchanged, is denoted by 
 A x u. Similarly, A y u and z u express the increments of u due to changes 
 respectively in y alone and in z alone. The total change in u due to 
 simultaneous changes in all the independent variables is sometimes 
 denoted by Au; so that if u=f(x, y, z), 
 
 A v u 
 
 , . * , 
 Ay -\ ---- Az + e, 
 AT Ay Az 
 
 where e is an infinitesimal of an order higher than the first. 
 
 The partial derivatives of u with respect to x, y, and z are denoted by 
 D x u, D y u, and D z n, and the sign = placed between a variable and a con- 
 stant is used to show that the former is to be made to approach the 
 latter as its limit. In those cases where it is desirable to draw attention 
 
 to the fact that a certain derivative is total, the differential notation 
 
 dn . 
 
 is used. 
 
 dx
 
 PREFACE. V 
 
 view will find what they have learned here useful when 
 they take up standard works on the subject. 
 
 My sincere thanks are due to H. N. Wheeler, A.M., who 
 has read much of the manuscript of the following pages and 
 all of the proof, and to Dr. E. H. Hall, who has examined 
 parts of Chapters iv. and v. and helped me with various 
 suggestions. I am indebted to other friends also, and among 
 them to Mr. "W. A. Stone for the use of some of his problems. 
 
 The reader who wishes to get a thorough knowledge of 
 the properties of the Newtonian Potential Function and of 
 its applications to problems in Electricity is referred to the 
 following works, which, with others, I have consulted and used 
 in writing these notes. 
 
 Betti : Teorica delle Forze Newtoniane e sue Application! all' 
 
 Elettrostatica e al Magnetismo. 
 Clausius : Die Potentialf unction und das Potential. 
 Gumming : An Introduction to the Theory of Electricity. 
 Chrystal : The article " Electricity " in the Ninth Edition of the 
 
 Encyclopaedia Britannica. 
 Dirichlet: Yorlesungeu iiber die im umgekehrteu Verhaltniss des 
 
 Quadrats der Entfernung \virkenden Kriifte. 
 Gauss : Allgemeine Lehrsiitze in Beziehung auf die im verkehrten 
 
 Verhaltnisse des Quadrates der Entfernung -wirkenden Anzieh- 
 
 ungs- und Abstossungskriifte. Also other papers to be found 
 
 in Volume Y. of his Gesammelte Werke. 
 Green : An Essay on the Application of Mathematical Analysis to 
 
 the Theories of Electricity and Magnetism.* 
 Mascart: Traite d'Electricite Statique. Also Wallentin's translation 
 
 of the same work into German, with additions. 
 
 *A copy of the original edition of this paper is to be found in the 
 Library of Harvard University, Gore Hall, Cambridge. The paper has 
 boon reprinted by Ferrers in " The Mathematical Papers of George Green," 
 and by Thomson in CrelU-'s Journal.
 
 vi PREFACE. 
 
 Mascart et Joubert :. Lemons sur 1'Electricite et le Magnetisme. 
 
 Also Atkinson's translation of the same work into English, with 
 
 additions. 
 Mathieu: Theorie du Potential et ses Applications a 1'Electro- 
 
 statique et au Magnetisme. 
 Maxwell: An Elementary Treatise on Electricity. A Treatise on 
 
 Electricity and Magnetism. 
 Minchin : A Treatise on Statics. 
 C. Neumann: Untersuchuugen iiber das Logarithmische und New- 
 
 ton'sche Potential. 
 Riemann: Schwere, Electricitat und Magnetismus, edited by Hatten- 
 
 dorff. 
 
 Schell: Theorie der Bewegung und der Krafte. 
 Thomson : Eeprint of Papers on Electrostatics and Magnetism. 
 Thomson and Tait: A Treatise 011 Natural Philosophy. 
 Todhunter : A Treatise on Analytical Statics. 
 Watson and Burbury: The Mathematical Theory of Electricity 
 
 and Magnetism. 
 Wiedemann : Die Lehre von der Electricitat.
 
 TABLE OF CONTENTS. 
 
 CHAPTER I. 
 
 THE ATTRACTION OP GRAVITATION. 
 SECTION. PAGE 
 
 1. The law of gravitation 1 
 
 2. The attraction at a point 1 
 
 3. The unit of force 2 
 
 4. The attraction due to discrete particles .... 2 
 
 5. The attraction of a straight wire at a point in its axis . 3 
 
 6. The attraction at any point due to a straight wire . . 4 
 
 7. The attraction at a point in its axis due to a cylinder of 
 
 revolution ......... 7 
 
 8. The attraction at the vertex of a cone of revolution due 
 
 to the whole cone and to different frusta ... 8 
 
 9. The attraction due to a homogeneous spherical shell; to 
 
 a solid sphere ........ 11 
 
 10. The attraction due to a homogeneous hemisphere . . 13 
 
 11. Apparent anomalies in the latitudes of places near the 
 
 foot of a hemispherical hill 15 
 
 12. The attraction due to any ellipsoidal homo?oid is zero at 
 
 all points within the cavity enclosed by the shell . .1(5 
 
 13. The attraction due to a spherical shell whose density at 
 
 any point depends upon the distance of the point from 
 the centre IS 
 
 14. The attraction at any point due to any given mass . .19 
 
 15. The component in any direction of the attraction at a point 
 
 P due to a given mass is always finite . . . .21
 
 viii TABLE OF CONTENTS. 
 
 SECTION PAGE 
 
 16. The attraction between two straight wires . . . .22 
 
 17. The attraction between two spheres 23 
 
 18. The attraction between any two rigid bodies . . .24 
 
 CHAPTER II. 
 
 THE NEWTONIAN POTENTIAL FUNCTION IN THE CASE OF 
 GRAVITATION. 
 
 19. Definition of the potential function 29 
 
 20. The derivatives of the potential function relative to the 
 
 space coordinates are functions of these coordinates 
 which represent the components parallel to the coordi- 
 nate axes of the attraction at the point (x, y, z) . 30 
 
 21. Extension of the statement of the last section . . .31 
 
 22. The potential function due to a given attracting mass is 
 
 everywhere finite, and the statements of the two pre- 
 ceding sections hold good for points within the attract- 
 ing mass 32 
 
 23. The potential function due to a straight wire . . .34 
 
 24. The potential function due to a spherical shell . . .35 
 
 25. Equipotential surfaces'and their properties . . . .37 
 
 26. The potential function is zero at infinity . . . .40 
 
 27. The potential function as a measure of work . . .40 
 
 28. Laplace's Equation 42 
 
 29. The second derivatives of the potential function are finite 
 
 at points within the attracting mass . . . . 43 
 
 30. The first derivatives of the potential function change con- 
 
 tinuously as the point, (x, y, z) moves through the 
 boundaries of an attracting mass 48 
 
 31. Theorem due to Gauss. The potential function can have 
 
 no maxima or minima at points of empty space . . 50 
 
 32. Tubes of force and their properties 53 
 
 33. Spherical distributions of matter and their attractions . 54 
 
 34. Cylindrical distributions of matter and their attractions . 58
 
 TABLE OF CONTENTS. IX 
 
 SECTION PAGE 
 
 35. Poisson's Equation obtained by the application of Gauss's 
 
 Theorem to volume elements 59 
 
 36. Poisson's Equation in the integral form . . . .62 
 
 37. The average value of the potential function on a spherical 
 
 surface 64 
 
 38. The equilibrium of fluids at rest under the action of 
 
 given forces 66 
 
 CHAPTER III. 
 
 THE NEWTONIAN POTENTIAL FUNCTION IN THE CASE OF 
 REPULSION. 
 
 39. Repulsion according to the " Law of Nature "... 72 
 
 40. The force at any point due to a given distribution of repel- 
 
 ling matter ......... 73 
 
 41. The potential function due to repelling matter as a measure 
 
 of work x . . . . . . . . .75 
 
 42. Gauss's Theorem in the case of repelling matter . . .75 
 
 43. Poisson's Equation in the case of repelling matter . . 76 
 
 44. The coexistence of two kinds of active matter . . .77 
 
 CHAPTER IV. 
 
 THE PROPERTIES OF SURFACE DISTRIBUTIONS. GREEN'S 
 THEOREM. 
 
 45. The force due to a closed shell of repelling matter . . 80 
 
 46. The potential function is finite at points in a surface distri- 
 
 bution of matter .82 
 
 47. The normal force at any point of a surface distribution . 85 
 
 48. Green's Theorem ......... 87 
 
 49. Special cases under Green's Theorem . . . . .01 
 
 50. Surface distributions which are equivalent to certain vol- 
 
 ume distributions ..... .05 
 
 51. Those characteristics of the potential function which are 
 
 sufficient to determine the function . .96 
 
 52. Thomson's Theorem. Dirichlet's Principle . . .98
 
 X TABLE OF CONTENTS. 
 
 CHAPTER V. 
 
 ELECTROSTATICS. 
 SECTION PAGE 
 
 53. Introductory 103 
 
 54. The charges on conductors are superficial .... 104 
 
 55. General principles which follow directly from the theory 
 
 of the Newtonian potential function . . . .106 
 
 56. Tubes of force and their properties 108 
 
 57. Hollow conductors 110 
 
 58. The charge induced on a conductor which is put to earth . 114 
 
 59. Coefficients of induction and capacity .... 115 
 
 60. The distribution of electricity on a spherical conductor . 117 
 
 61. The distribution of a given charge on an ellipsoidal con- 
 
 ductor .......... 118 
 
 62. Spherical condensers ........ 119 
 
 63. Condensers made of two parallel conducting plates . . 122 
 
 64. The capacity of a long cylinder surrounded by a concentric 
 
 cylindrical shell .124 
 
 65. Specific inductive capacity ....... 125 
 
 66. The charge induced on a conducting .sphere by a charge 
 
 at an' outside point . . . . . . .130 
 
 67. The energy of charged conductors ..... f34
 
 THE 
 
 NEWTONIAN POTENTIAL FUNCTION, 
 
 CHAPTER I. 
 THE ATTEACTION OF GEAVITATIOU. 
 
 1. The Law of Gravitation. Every body in the universe 
 attracts every other body with a force which depends for mag- 
 nitude and direction upon the masses of the two bodies and 
 upon their relative positions. 
 
 An approximate value of the attraction between any two rigid 
 bodies may be obtained by imagining the bodies to be divided 
 into small particles, and assuming that every particle of the one 
 body attracts every particle of the other with a force directly 
 proportional to the product of the masses of the two particles, 
 and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between 
 their centres or other corresponding points. The true value of 
 the attraction is the limit approached by this approximate value 
 as the particles into which the bodies are supposed to be divided 
 are made smaller and smaller. 
 
 2. The Attraction at a Point By "the attraction at any 
 point P in space, due to one or more attracting masses," is 
 meant the limit which would be approached by the value of the 
 attraction on a sphere of unit mass centred at P if the radius of 
 the sphere were made continually smaller and smaller while its 
 mass remained unchanged. The attraction at 7* is, then, the 
 attraction on a unit mass supposed to be concentrated at P.
 
 2 THE ATTRACTION OF GRAVITATION. 
 
 If the attraction at every point throughout a certain region 
 has a value other than zero, the region is called ' ' a field of 
 force " ; and the attraction at any point P in the region is called 
 " the strength of the field" at that point. 
 
 3. The Unit of Force. It will presently appear that all spheres 
 made of homogeneous material attract bodies outside of them- 
 selves as if the masses of the spheres were concentrated at their 
 middle points. If, then, Jc be the force of attraction between 
 two unit masses concentrated at points at the unit distance 
 apart, the attraction at a point P due to a homogeneous sphere 
 
 A 3 
 
 of radius a and of density p is &'~- g ? where r is the dis- 
 tance of P from the centre of the sphere. In all that follows, 
 however, we shall take as our unit of force the force of attrac- 
 tion between two unit masses concentrated at points at the unit 
 distance apart. Using these units, k in the expression given 
 above becomes 1, and the attraction between two particles of 
 
 mass mi and m 2 concentrated at points r units apart is i-^- 
 
 r 
 
 4. Attraction due to Discrete Particles. The attraction at a 
 point P, due to particles concentrated at different points in the 
 same plane with P, may be expressed in terms of two com- 
 ponents at right angles to each other. 
 
 FIG. 1. 
 
 Let the straight lines joining P with the different particles be 
 denoted by r n r 2 , r 3 , , and the angles which these lines make 
 with some fixed line Px by a l5 a 2 , a 3 , . If, then, the masses
 
 THE ATTRACTION OF GRAVITATION. 3 
 
 of the several particles are respectively wij, m 2 , m 3 , , the 
 components of the attraction at P are 
 
 m, COSa 2 . rin 
 
 ^ -- 1 = / - [I] 
 
 2 
 
 in the direction P#, and 
 
 v _ ?ft! sin a! _j_ 7?i 2 sn a 2 
 
 ~ 
 
 rf ?y 
 
 in the direction Py, perpendicular to Px. 
 The resultant force at P is 
 
 _,_ _ ro -, 
 
 ' ' ' * 7 5 ' L^ J 
 
 2 
 
 F 2 , [3] 
 
 and its line of action makes with Px the angle whose tangent 
 
 . T 
 
 is 
 
 X 
 
 If the particles do not all lie in the same plane with P, we 
 may draw through P three mutually perpendicular axes, and call 
 the angles which the lines joining P with the different particles 
 make with the first axis a n a 2 , a 3 , ; with the second axis, 
 /?n /?2i &, ; and with the third axis, y a , y,, y 3 , .... The three 
 components in the directions of these axes of the attraction at 
 P due to all the particles are then 
 
 Wl COS a T r_X^W COS /? . _X^Wl COSy 
 
 - ^ ' / ~> - ~ 
 
 ** r 
 
 The resultant attraction is 
 
 . _ r .-, 
 
 ~~ / - ~> ' 
 
 
 
 Y 2 +Z*, [5] 
 
 and its line of action makes with the axes angles whose cosines 
 are respectively 
 
 1 1' and I ra 
 
 5. Attraction at a Point in the Produced Axis of a Straight 
 Wire. Let ft be the mass of the unit of length of a uniform 
 straight wire AB of length /, and of cross section so small that
 
 4 THE ATTRACTION OF GRAVITATION. 
 
 we may suppose the mass of the wire concentrated in its axis 
 (see Fig. 2), and let P be a point in the line AB produced at a 
 
 I HI Hr 
 
 FIG. 2. 
 
 distance a from ^1. Divide the wire into elements of length 
 Aa;. The attraction at P due to one of these elements, Jf, whose 
 
 nearest point is at a distance x from P, is less than ^ and 
 
 ar 
 
 greater than 
 
 (z + Aa;) 2 
 
 The attraction at P due to the whole wire lies between 
 
 Z^ and 7 ; but these quantities approach the 
 ar L^(x -f- Aa;)- 
 
 same limit as Aa; is made to approach zero, so that the attrac- 
 tion at P is 
 
 limit 
 Ax = ( 
 
 If the coordinates of P, .4, and B are respectively (a;, 0, 0) , 
 (a?!, 0, 0), and (ccj + Z, 0, 0), this result may be put into the form 
 
 _j 11 
 
 
 
 x l x x t . x + Ij 
 
 [8] 
 
 6. Attraction at any Point, due to a Straight Wire. Let P 
 (Fig. 3) be any point in the perpendicular drawn to the straight 
 wire AB at A, and let PA = c, AB = Z, AM = #, and the angle 
 ABP= 8. Let MN be one of the equal elements of mass (/^Aa 1 ) 
 into which the wire is divided, and call PM, r. The attraction 
 
 II y\ /y 
 
 at P due to this element is approximately equal to ' , and 
 
 r- 
 
 acts in some direction lying between PM and PN. This attrac- 
 tion can be resolved into two components whose approximate 
 
 values are ^ ' in the direction PA. and ^ x ' - in the 
 
 2 (c 2 +ar z )i
 
 THE ATTRACTION OF GRAVITATION. 
 
 direction PL. The true values of the components in these 
 directions of the attraction at P, due to the whole wire, are, 
 then, respectively : 
 
 p t,cdx tf x 1 / 
 Jo ((r'-f-ar)tJ c [ Vc^+^Jo c 
 
 and 
 
 [9] 
 [10] 
 
 FIG. 3. 
 
 The resultant attraction is equal to the square root of the sum 
 of the squares of these components, or 
 
 and its line of action makes with PA an angle whose tangent is 
 
 = tan ^ APB. 
 
 cos 8 
 
 sin APB 2 sin | APB cos ^ APE 
 
 That is, the resultant attraction at P acts in the direction of 
 the bisector of the angle APB. 
 
 From these results we can easily obtain the value of the 
 attraction at any point P, due to a uniform straight wire B'B 
 (Fig. 4) . Drop a perpendicular PA from P upon the axis of 
 the wire. Let AB = Z, AB' = /', PA = c, ABP = 8, AB'P = 3', 
 BPB'=0. The component in the direction PA of the attrac- 
 tion at P is [9] 
 
 ~ (cos 8+ cos 8'),
 
 6 THE ATTRACTION OF GRAVITATION.. 
 
 and that in the direction PL is 
 
 -(sin 8' sin 8), 
 so that the resultant attraction is 
 
 FIG. 4. 
 
 The line of action PKof R makes with PA an angle < such 
 that 
 
 sin 8' sin S 
 cos 8 + cos 8 
 
 , ,<-,, x 
 = tanks'- S); 
 
 1-10-1 
 [13] 
 
 and 
 
 It is to be noticed that PK bisects the angle 0, and does not 
 in general pass through the centre of gravity or any other fixed 
 point of the wire. Indeed, the path of a particle moving from 
 rest under the attraction of a straight wire is generally curved ; 
 for if the particle should start at a point Q and move a short 
 distance on the bisector of the angle BQB' to Q', the attraction 
 of the wire would now urge the particle in the direction of the 
 bisector of the angle BQ'B', and this is usually not coincident 
 with the bisector of BQB'.
 
 THE ATTRACTION OF GRAVITATION. 7 
 
 If q is the area of the cross section of the wire, and p the 
 mass of the unit volume of the substance of which the wire is 
 made, we may substitute for p. in the formulas of this section 
 its value qp. 
 
 If instead of a very thin wire we had a body in the shape of 
 a prism or cylinder of considerable cross section, we might 
 divide this up into a large number of slender prisms and use the 
 equations just obtained to find the limit of the sum of the attrac- 
 tions at any point due to all these elementary prisms. This 
 would be the attraction due to the given body. 
 
 7. Attraction at a Point in the Produced Axis of a Cylinder 
 of Revolution. In order to find the attraction due to a homo- 
 geneous cylinder of revolution at any point P (Fig. 5) in the 
 axis of the cylinder produced, it will be convenient to imagine 
 the cylinder cut up into discs of constant thickness Ac, by 
 means of planes perpendicular to the axis. 
 
 Let p be the mass of the unit of volume of the cylinder, and 
 a the radius of its base. Consider a disc whose nearer face is 
 at a distance c from P, and divide it into elements by means of 
 
 B B 
 
 FIG. 5. 
 
 radial planes drawn at angular intervals of A0 and concentric 
 cylindrical surfaces at radial intervals of Ar. 
 
 The mass of any element J/ whose inner radius is r is equal 
 to pAc-A0[rAr + (Ar) 2 ], antl tne whole attraction at P due to 
 
 M is approximately p - [ (Ar) ] iu a Une j omiug p 
 
 with some point of J/. The component of this attraction in 
 the direction PC is found by multiplying tbe expression just
 
 8 THE ATTRACTION OF GRAVITATION. 
 
 /> 
 
 given by , the cosine of the angle CP/S, so that the 
 
 /~2 i - 2 
 
 V c" + r 
 
 attraction at P in the direction P(7, due to the whole disc, is 
 approximately 
 
 Ac - 
 
 /27T x< 
 
 = Ac I dO \ 
 
 Jo Jo 
 
 pcrdr 
 
 1 - . c 
 
 L v?^ 
 
 If the bases of the cylinder are at distances c and c + h 
 from P, the true value of the attraction at P in the direction 
 PC, due to the cylinder QQ', is 
 
 limit X.^o A C r> C c + h f-> C \ 7 
 2wpAc 1 - = 2 ?rp I [1 )(ic 
 
 [15] 
 
 This is evidently the whole attraction at P due to the cylin- 
 der, for considerations of symmetry show us that the resultant 
 attraction at P has no component perpendicular to PC. 
 
 [14] gives the attraction due to the elementary disc ABA'JB', 
 on the assumption that the whole matter of the disc is concen- 
 trated at the fape ABC. The actual attraction at P due to 
 this disc may be found by putting c = c and h = Ac in [15]. 
 
 If a, the radius of the cylinder, is very large compared with 
 h and c , the expression [15] for the attraction at P due to the 
 cylinder approaches the value 
 
 8. Attraction at the Vertex of a Cone. The attraction due to 
 a homogeneous cone of revolution, at a point at the vertex of 
 the cone, may be found by the aid of [14]. 
 
 If Fig. 6 represents a plane section of the cone taken through 
 the axis, and if PM= c, MM' = Ac, and MB = ?, the attraction 
 at P due to the disc ABCD is approximately 
 
 27rpAc(l COS a),
 
 THE ATTRACTION OF GRAVITATION. 
 
 and the attraction due to the whole cone is 
 
 - COSa) AC = 2,rp(l - COSa) 
 
 = 27rp(l-COSa).PZ. [16] 
 
 The attraction at P due to the frustum ABKN is found by 
 subtracting the value of the attraction due to the cone ABP 
 from the expression given in [1C], The result is 
 
 [17] 
 
 and it is easy to see from this that discs of equal thickness cut 
 out of a; cone of revolution at different distances from the vertex 
 by planes perpendicular to the axis exert equal attractions at 
 the vertex of the cone. 
 
 FIG. 6. 
 
 It follows almost directly that the portions cut out of two 
 concentric spherical shells of equal uniform density and equal 
 thickness, by any conical surface having its vertex at the 
 common centre P of the shells, exert equal attraction at this 
 centre ; but we may prove this proposition otherwise ^ as fol- 
 lows : 
 
 Divide the inner surface of the portion cut out of one of the 
 shells by the given cone into elements, and make the perimeter 
 of each of these surface elements the directrix of a conical 
 surface having its vertex at P. Divide the given shells into 
 elementary shells of thickness Arby means of concentric spheri- 
 cal surfaces drawn about P. In this way the attracting masses 
 will be cut up into volume elements. 
 
 Let ML 1 (Fig. 7) represent one of these elements, whose 
 inner surface has a radius equal to r ; then, if the elementary
 
 10 THE ATTRACTION OF GEAVITAT1ON. 
 
 cone APB intercept an element of area Aw from a spherical sur- 
 face of radius unity drawn around P, the area of the surface 
 element at MM' is i & Aw, and that at LL' is (r + Ar) 2 Aw. The 
 
 attraction at P in the direction PJf, due to the element ML', is 
 approximately 
 
 P 
 
 and the component of this in any direction Px, making an 
 angle a with PM, is approximately p Aw Ar cos a. The attraction 
 at P in the direction Px, due to the whole shell EDFG, is, 
 
 then, ^-v 
 
 X = lim ^ p Ar Aw cos a, 
 
 where the sum is to include all the volume elements which go to 
 make up the shell. If PF= r c , PG = r 1} PF'= r ', PG' = r/, 
 and . = FG = 
 
 X I c^r j cos adu pn | cosadw. 
 
 The attraction at P in the same direction, due to the shell 
 E'D'F'G', is 
 
 X 1 = p I l dr I cosadw = pp ( cos adw. 
 
 But the limits of integration with regard to w are the same in 
 both cases ; .-. X= X', which was to be proved. 
 
 If the shells are of different thicknesses, it is evident that 
 they will exert attractions at P proportional to these thick- 
 
 nesses.
 
 THE ATTRACTION OF GRAVITATION. 
 
 11 
 
 The area of the portion which a conical surface cuts out of a 
 spherical surface of unit radius drawn about the vertex of the 
 cone is called " the solid angle " of the conical surface. 
 
 9. Attraction of a Spherical Shell. In order to find the 
 attraction at P, any point in space, due. to a homogeneous 
 spherical shell of radii ?' and 1\, it will be best to begin by 
 dividing up the shell into a large number of concentric shells 
 of thickness Ar, and to consider first the attraction of one of 
 these thin shells, whose inside radius shall be r. 
 
 Let p be the density of the given shell, that is, the mass of 
 the unit of volume of the material of which the shell is com- 
 posed. Join P (Fig. 8) with by a straight line cutting the 
 inner surface of the thin shell at J\ T , and pass a plane through 
 PO cutting this inner surface in a great circle NLSL', which 
 
 FIG. 8. 
 
 will serve as a prime meridian. Using N as a pole, .describe 
 upon the inner surface of the thin shell a number of parallels of 
 latitude so as to cut off equal arcs on NLSL'. Denote by A0 
 the angle which each one of these arcs subtends at 0. Through 
 PO pass a number of planes so as to cut up each parallel of 
 latitude into equal arcs. Denote by A< the angle between any 
 two contiguous planes of this series. By this moans the inner 
 surface of the elementary shell will be divided into small quad- 
 rilaterals, each of which will have two sides formed of meridian 
 arcs, of length r-A'J, and two sides formed of arcs of parallels 
 of latitude, of length rsin0-A< and r sin(#-f- A0)- A<, where
 
 12 THE ATTRACTION OF GRAVITATION. 
 
 G is the angle which the radius drawn to the parallel of higher 
 latitude makes with ON. The area of one of these quadri- 
 laterals is approximately r^sinO- A0- A<, and the thickness of 
 the shell is Ar, so that the element of volume is approxi- 
 mately ? <2 sin0- Ar- A0 A<. Let PMy, then the attrac- 
 tion at P, due to an element of mass which has a corner at 
 
 nr <- i P^ 2 sin0ArA0A<f> . ,, ,. ,. 
 
 M, is approximately f - , in the direction PM. 
 
 This force may be resolved into three components : one in the 
 direction PO, the others in directions perpendicular to PO 
 and to each other ; but it is evident from considerations of 
 symmetry that in finding the attraction at P due to the whole 
 shell, we shall need only that component which acts in PO. This 
 
 , , or 2 sin 6 Ar M A< cos KPM 
 is approximately ; or, if PO = c, 
 
 y 
 
 The attraction at P due to the whole elementary shell is, then, 
 approximately (truly on the assumption that the whole mass of 
 the shell is concentrated at its inner surface), 
 
 Ar f C 
 J J 
 
 pr * Sin e ( c ~ r cos 
 
 y 3 
 and the true value at P of the attraction due to the iven shell is 
 
 f ri Xdr 
 
 Jr 
 
 [20] 
 
 If in the expression for X we substitute for its value in 
 terms of y, we have, since 
 
 y 2 = (r + y 2 2 crcos0, 
 and hence . 2ydy = 2crsinOd9, 
 
 X- Cc 
 
 J 
 
 [21]
 
 THE ATTRACTION OF GRAVITATION. 13 
 
 In order to find the limits of the integration with regard to y, 
 we must distinguish between two cases : 
 
 I. If P is a point in the cavity enclosed by the given shell, 
 = r c and l = r + c ; 
 
 2 "] 0? ^ 
 
 .. 
 
 c 2 r + c r c 
 
 and f ri Xtfr = 0; [23] 
 
 so that a homogeneous spherical shell exerts no attraction at 
 points in the cavity which it encloses. 
 
 II. If P is a point without the given shell, 
 
 y =c r and y l = c -f- r ; 
 
 and 
 
 From this it follows that the attraction due to a spherical 
 shell of uniform density is the same, at a point without the shell, 
 as the attraction due to a mass equal to that of the shell con- 
 centrated at the shell's centre. 
 
 If in [25] we make r = 0, we have the attraction, due to a 
 solid sphere of radius i\ and density p, at a point outside the 
 sphere at a distance c from the centre. This is 
 
 4 irp 
 
 ,3 
 
 [2G] 
 
 oir 
 
 10. Attraction due to a Hemisphere. At any point P in the 
 plane of the base of a homogeneous hemisphere, the attraction 
 of the hemisphere gives rise to two components, one directed 
 toward the centre of the base, the other perpendicular to the 
 plane of the base. AVe will compute the values of these com- 
 ponents for the particular case where P lies on the rim of the 
 hemisphere's base, and for this purpose we will take the origin
 
 14 
 
 THE ATTRACTION OF GRAVITATION. 
 
 of our sj'stem of polar coordinates at P, because by so doing 
 we shall escape having to deal with a quantity which becomes 
 infinite at one of the limits of integration. Denote the coordi- 
 nates of any point L in the hemisphere by r, 0, <, where (Fig. 9) 
 XPN= </>, IPL = 0, and PL = r. 
 
 If r l be the radius of the hemisphere, 
 PT = PNcos NPT = PX cos XPN- cos NPT = 2 r^ sin 6 cos <. 
 
 V r> T IK IK 
 cosXPL = - = = 
 PL r 
 
 ODT IL sin d> . a . , 
 
 cos SPL = = - = 2- = sm# sin d>. 
 PL r r 
 
 The mass of a polar element of volume whose corner is at 
 L is approximately p IL &$ PL &6 Ar or /3r 2 sin#ArA0A<, 
 and this divided by r 2 is the attraction at P in the direction PL 
 of the element, supposed concentrated at L. The components 
 of this attraction in the direction PX and PI" are respectively 
 psinflArAtfA^cosXPZ, and P s\u0^rM^cosSPL. 
 
 The component in the direction Py of the attraction at P due 
 to the whole hemisphere is, then, 
 
 J f* 1t /2r, sinS co8<Ji 
 2d(J> I dO I p shrO sincfrdr = 
 
 [27]
 
 THE ATTRACTION OF GRAVITATION. 15 
 
 and the component in the direction Px is 
 
 xr /"TT x2r! sinO cos<J> 
 
 I 2 cZ(| cZ0 I p sin- cos <(?>= fTrpTV [28] 
 
 /0 /0 c/0 
 
 This last expression might have been obtained from [26] by 
 making c equal to r and halving the result. 
 
 11. Attraction of a Hemispherical Hill. If at a point on the 
 earth at the southern extremity of a homogeneous hemispheri- 
 cal hill of density p and radius i\ the force of gravity due to the 
 earth, supposed spherical, is gr,- the attraction due to the earth 
 and the hill will give rise to two components, g ^pi\ down- 
 wards, and f Trp^ northwards. The resultant attraction does 
 not therefore act in the direction of the centre of the earth, but 
 
 makes with this direction an angle whose tangent is 
 
 FIG. 10. 
 
 Let < (Fig. 10) be the true latitude of the place and (< ) 
 the apparent latitude, as obtained by measuring the angle wh'mh 
 the plumb-line at the place makes with the plane of the equator. 
 Let a be the radius of the earth and <r its average densitv. Then 
 
 tana = 
 
 [29]
 
 16 THE ATTRACTION OF GRAVITATION. 
 
 The radius of the earth is very large compared with the 
 radius of the hill, and a is a small angle, so that approximately 
 
 a = -- i -, and the apparent latitude of the place is < -- -i 
 2 acr 2 acr 
 
 If < x is the true latitude of a place just north of the same hill, 
 
 its apparent latitude will be ^ -f- -^^ , and the apparent differ- 
 
 2 acr 
 
 ence of latitude between the two places, one just north of the 
 hill and the other just south of it, will be the true difference 
 
 plus -J. If there were a hemispherical cavity between the two 
 acr 
 
 places instead of a hemispherical hill, the apparent difference of 
 latitude would be less than the true difference. 
 
 12. Ellipsoidal Homceoids. A shell, thick or thin, bounded 
 by two ellipsoidal surfaces, concentric, similar, and similarly 
 placed, shall be called an ellipsoidal homoeoid. 
 
 FIG. 11. 
 
 It is a property of every such shell that if any straight line 
 cut its outer surface at the points $, S' (Fig. 11) and its inner 
 surface at Q, Q', so that these four points lie in the order 
 SQQ'S 1 , the length SQ will be equal to the length Q'S'. 
 
 We will prove that the attraction of a homogeneous closed
 
 THE ATTRACTION OF GRAVITATION. 17 
 
 ellipsoidal bomoeoid, at any point P in the cavity which it shuts 
 in, is zero. 
 
 Make P the vertex of a slender conical surface of two 
 nappes, A and B, and suppose the plane of the paper to be 
 so chosen that PQ is the shortest and PM the longest length 
 cut from any element of the nappe A by the inner surface of 
 the homceoid. Draw about P spherical surfaces of radii PQ, 
 PM, PS, and PO, and imagine the space between the inner- 
 most and outermost of these surfaces filled with matter of the 
 same density as the homceoid. The nappe A cuts out a portion 
 from this spherical shell whose trace on the plane of the 
 paper is QLOT. Let us call this, for short, " the element 
 QLOT." The attraction atP, due to the element QMOS which 
 A cuts out of the homoeoid, is less than the attraction at the 
 same point due to the element QLOT, and greater than that 
 due to the element whose trace is KMNS. But the attraction 
 at P, due to the first of these elements of spherical shells, is to 
 the attraction due to the other as the thickness of the first shell 
 is to that of the other, or as QTis to KS. (See Section 8.) 
 The limit of the ratio of QT to KS, as the solid angle of the 
 cone is made smaller and smaller, is unity ; therefore the limit 
 of the ratio of the attraction at P due to the element QMOS, to 
 the attraction due to the element of spherical shell whose trace 
 is QLNS, is unity. By a similar construction it is eas} 7 to show 
 that the limit of the ratio of the attraction at P, due to the 
 element which B cuts out of the homceoid, to the attraction due 
 to the portion of spherical shell whose trace is Q'L'N'S', is 
 unity. 
 
 But the attractions at P, due to the elements Q'L'N'S' and 
 QLNS, are equal in amount (since their thicknesses are the 
 same) and opposite in direction, so that if for the elements of 
 the homoeoid these elements were substituted, there would be no 
 resultant attraction at P. In order to get the attraction at P 
 in any direction due to the whole homteoid we may cut up the 
 inner surface of the homo?oid into elements, use the perimeter 
 of each one of these elements as the directrix of a conical sur-
 
 18 THE ATTRACTION OF GRAVITATION. 
 
 face having its vertex at P, and find the limit of the sum of the 
 attractions due to the elements which these conical surfaces cut 
 from the homceoid. Wherever we have to find the finite limit of 
 the sum of a series of infinitesimal quantities, we may without 
 error substitute for any one of these another infinitesimal, the 
 limit of whose ratio to the first is unit}'. For the attractions at P 
 due to the elements of the homoeoid we may, therefore, substi- 
 tute attractions due to elements of spherical shells, which, as we 
 have seen, destroy each other in pairs. Hence our proposition. 
 A shell bounded by two concentric spherical surfaces gives a 
 special case under this theorem. 
 
 13. Sphere of Variable Density. The density of a homo- 
 geneous body is the amount of matter contained in the unit 
 volume of the material of which the body is composed, and this 
 may be obtained by dividing the mass of the body b} T its volume. 
 
 If the amount of matter contained in a given volume is not 
 the same thi-oughout a body, the body is called heterogeneous, 
 and its density is said to be variable. 
 
 The average density of a heterogeneous body is the ratio of 
 the mass of the body to its volume. The actual density p at 
 any point Q inside the body is defined to be the limit of the 
 ratio of the mass of a small portion of the body taken about Q 
 to the volume of this portion as the latter is made smaller and 
 smaller. 
 
 The attraction, at any point P, due to a spherical shell whose 
 density is the same at all points equidistant from the common 
 centre of the spherical surfaces which bound the shell but dif- 
 ferent at different distances from this centre, may be obtained 
 with the help of some of the equations in Article 9. 
 
 Since p is independent of 6 and <, it may be taken out from 
 under the signs of integration with regard to these variables, 
 although it must be left under the sign of integration with re- 
 gard to r. 
 
 Equations 19 to 24 inclusive hold for the case that we 
 are now considering as well as for the case when p is constant,
 
 THE ATTRACTION OF GRAVITATION. 
 
 19 
 
 so that the attraction at all points within the cavity enclosed by 
 a spherical shell whose density varies* with the distance from the 
 centre is zero. 
 
 If P is without the shell, the attraction is 
 
 r r i , / r i47rp?- 2 dr 
 I AcZr = I ^ , 
 Jr Jr. cr 
 
 or, if p=/(r), 
 
 I 
 
 The mass of the shell is evidently 
 
 [30] 
 
 [31] 
 
 and [30] declares that a spherical shell whose density is a 
 function of the distance from its centre attracts at all outside 
 points as if the whole mass of the shell were concentrated at the 
 centre. 
 
 If r = 0, we have the case of a solid sphere. 
 
 14. Attraction due to any Mass. In order to find the attrac- 
 tion at a point P (Fig. 12), due to any attracting masses J/'. we 
 may choose a system of rectangular coordinate axes and divide 
 
 P 
 
 
 
 
 
 X' 
 
 v/ 
 
 ^ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 I/ " 
 
 ^\ 
 
 / 
 
 FIG. 12. 
 
 J/"' up into volume elements. If p is the average density of one 
 of these elements (Ar'), the mass of the element will be pAi 1 '. 
 Let Q, whose coordinates are x', y\ z', be a point of the ele-
 
 20 THE ATTRACTION OF GRAVITATION. 
 
 merit, and let the coordinates of P be x, y, z. The attraction 
 at P in the direction PQ due to this element is approximately 
 
 pAv' 
 
 ^=5, and the components of this in the direction of the coordi- 
 
 PQ 
 
 nate axes are 
 
 pAv' , pAv' , , pAv' , 
 
 cos a', t~ cos/3', and ^r cosy', [32] 
 
 PQ' P& PQ- 
 
 where a', /3', 7' are the angles which PQ makes with the positive 
 directions of the axes. 
 It is easy to see that 
 
 PL x'x 
 
 and, similarly, that 
 
 , and cos 7 ' = 
 
 Moreover, 
 
 and this we will call r 2 . 
 
 The true values of the components in the direction of the 
 coordinate axes of the attraction at P, due to all the elements 
 which go to make up Jf', are, then, 
 
 v _ limit 
 ~A'=0 
 
 _ C C C p(x'-x}dx'dy'dz' . r3 , 
 
 J J J [(*'- ^) 2 + (y'- y)*+ (z 1 - ^) 2 ]i ' 
 
 T r_ limit X^pA?/(?/' y) 
 "~Av'=0 
 
 - r r r p^-y^ay^ r33 , 
 
 J J J [(aj'_a!)+(y'-y)+('-2)]r 
 _ limit X^P A ^'( 2 ' 2: ) 
 
 r r r P (^-g) 
 
 J J J [( B r_)i+(y'-
 
 THE ATTRACTION OF GRAVITATION. 21 
 
 where p is the density at the point (#', y [ ', z'), and where the 
 integrations with regard to x', t/', and z' are to include the whole 
 of M'. 
 
 The resultant attraction at P, due to Jf ; , is 
 
 [34] 
 
 and its line of action makes with the coordinate axes angles 
 whose cosines are 
 
 The component of the attraction at the point (x, y, z) in a- 
 direction making an angle e with the line of action of R is 
 .Rcose. If the direction cosines of this direction are A', //.', v', 
 we have 
 
 cose = AA'+ M/X'+ w'. 
 
 15. The quantities X, Y, Z, and R, which occur in the last 
 section, are in general functions of the coordinates #, ?/, andz of 
 
 the point P. Let us consider X, whose value is given in [33 A ] . 
 
 x i x 
 
 If P lies without the attracting mass J/', the quantity '- 
 
 is finite for all the elements into which J/' is divided. Let L 
 be the largest value which it can have for an\- one of these 
 
 elements, then X is less than L I I j pdx'dy'dz', or iJ/', and 
 
 this is finite. If P is a point within the space which the attract- 
 ing mass occupies, it is easy to show that, whatever physical 
 meaning we may attach to X, it has a finite value. To prove 
 this, make P the origin of a system of polar coordinates, and 
 divide 3/' up into elements like those used in Section 10. It 
 will then be clear that 
 
 X= C C Cp8m*0coa<ttdrd0d<l>, [3G] 
 
 where the limits are to be chosen so as to include all the at- 
 tracting mass. Since sin 2 0cos< can never be greater than
 
 22 THE ATTRACTION OF GRAVITATION. 
 
 unit} r , X is less than I I I pdrd6d(f>, which is evidently finite 
 
 when p is finite, as it always is in fact. 
 The corresponding expressions, 
 
 Y= C C Cps'm 2 0s'm<j>drd0d<l>, [37] 
 
 and Z = C C Cpsiu0cosOdrdOd<f>, [38] 
 
 can be proved finite in a similar manner ; and it follows that 
 X, Y, Z, and consequently R, are finite for all values of x, y, 
 and z. 
 
 As a special case, the attraction at a point P within the mass 
 of a homogeneous spherical shell, of radii ?- and r 1? and of den- 
 sity p, is 
 
 
 where r is the distance of P from the centre of the shell. 
 
 16. Attraction between Two Straight Wires. Let AK and 
 BK' (Fig. 13) be two sti-aight wires of lengths I and I' and of 
 line-densities p. and /*' ; and let KB = c. Divide AK into 
 
 K ............... B K' 
 
 M M' 
 
 FIG. 13. 
 
 elements of length A#, and consider one of these MM', such 
 that AM=x. The attraction of BK' on a unit mass concen- 
 
 trated at M would be (Sections 2 and 5), pA --- - I If, 
 
 therefore, the whole element MM' whose mass is /xA were con- 
 centrated at Jif, the attraction on it, due to BK', would be 
 
 [40]
 
 THE ATTRACTION OF GRAVITATION. 23 
 
 The actual force, due to the attraction of BK', with which the 
 whole wire AK is urged toward the right, is 
 
 limit X^'..fA,v.r 1 1 
 
 c-x 
 
 = , pc i L. _v, 
 
 Jo \x (i + i'+c) x (l + c )/ 
 
 - ""'[kg * ~* '-i -~ C ]r ""' ' g ( 'c(i + r+J ' [41] 
 
 17. Attraction between Two Spheres. Consider two homo- 
 geneous spheres of masses M and M' (Fig. 14), whose centres 
 C and C' are at a distance c from each other. Divide the sphere 
 M' into elements in the manner described in Section 9. The 
 attraction due to M at any point P' outside of this sphere is, as 
 
 we have seen, . and its line of action is in the direction 
 PC. 
 
 FIG. 14. 
 
 Let P'=(r, 0, <) be any point in the sphere Jf', and let 
 CP' = y. The attraction of M in the direction PC on an 
 element of mass prsintfAr A0A</> supposed concentrated at P is 
 
 component of this para ii e l to the 
 
 line C'C is P- The force
 
 24 THE ATTRACTION OF GRAVITATION. 
 
 which the whole sphere M ' is urged toward the right by the 
 attraction of M is, then, 
 
 W C C Cp^^QdrdOdff)^ rcosfl) .- . 2 -, 
 
 J J J y 8 
 
 where the integration is to be extended to all the elements 
 which go to make up M' . It is proved in Section 9 that the 
 
 M' 
 
 value of this triple integral is , so that the force of attraction 
 
 c 2 
 
 MM' 
 
 between the two spheres is - 
 
 18. Attraction between any Two Rigid Bodies. In order to 
 find the force with which a rigid body M is pulled in any direc- 
 tion (as for instance in that of the axis of x) by the attraction 
 of another body M' , we must in general find the value of a 
 sextuple integral. 
 
 Let M be divided up into small portions, and let Am be the 
 mass of one of these elements which contains the point (x, y, z} . 
 
 The component in the direction of the axis of x of the attrac- 
 tion at (x, y, z) due to M' is 
 
 p(x' x)dx'dy'dz' 
 
 and this would be the actual attraction in this direction on a 
 unit mass supposed concentrated at (#, ?/, z). If the mass A?>i 
 were concentrated at this point, the attraction on it in the direc- 
 tion of the axis of x would be 
 
 Am C f f p(x'-x)dx'dy'dz' , ., 
 
 JJJ \_( X <- x y+(y>-yy+(z>-zy-]i 
 
 The actual attraction in the direction of the axis of x of M' 
 upon the whole of M is, then, 
 
 limit V A C C C P( X '~ ^dx'dy'dz' 
 
 Am i
 
 THE ATTRACTION OF GRAVITATION. 25 
 
 If p' is the density at the point (#, ?/, z) , and if the elements 
 into which M is divided are rectangular parallelopipeds of di- 
 mensions A#, Ay, and Az, the expression just given may be 
 written 
 
 p'p (x 1 x) dx dy dz dx'dy'dz' p . . -, 
 
 where the integrations are first to be extended over M' and 
 then over M. 
 
 EXAMPLES. 
 
 1. Find the resultant attraction, at the origin of a system of 
 rectangular coordinates, due to masses of 12, 16, and 20 units 
 respectively, concentrated at the points (3, 4), ( 5, 12), and 
 (8, 6). What is its line of action ? 
 
 2. Find the value, at the origin of a system of rectangular 
 coordinates, of the attraction due to three equal spheres, each of 
 mass m, whose centres are at the points (a, 0, 0), (0,6,0), 
 (0, 0, c) . Find also the direction-cosines of the line of action 
 of this resultant attraction. 
 
 . 3. Show that the attraction, due to a uniform wire bent into 
 the form of the arc of a circumference, is the same at the centre 
 of the circumference as the attraction due to an}' uniform 
 straight wire of the same density which is tangent to the given 
 wire, and is terminated by the bounding radii (when produced) 
 of the given wire. 
 
 4. Show that in the case of an oblique cone whose base is 
 any plane figure the attraction at the vertex of the cone due to 
 any frustum varies, other things being equal, as the thickness 
 of the frustum. 
 
 5. Find the equation of a family of surfaces over each one of 
 which the resultant force of atti-action due to a uniform straight 
 wire is constant. 
 
 6. Using the foot-pound-second system of fundamental units, 
 and assuming that the average density of the earth is 5.G, com- 
 pare with the poundal the unit of force used in this chapter.
 
 26 THE ATTIIACTION OF GRAVITATION. 
 
 7. If in Fig. 2 we suppose P moved up to A, the attraction 
 at P becomes infinite according to [7], and yet Section 15 
 asserts that the value, at any point inside a given mass, of the 
 attraction due to this mass is always finite. Explain this. 
 8. A spherical cavity whose radius is r is made in a uniform 
 sphere of radius 2 r and mass ra in such a way that the centre 
 of the sphere lies on the wall of the cavity, i^ind the attraction 
 due to the resulting solid at different points on the line joining 
 the centre of the sphere with the centre of the cavity. 
 
 9. A uniform sphere of mass m is divided into halves by the 
 plane AB passed thi'ough its centre C. Find the value of the 
 attraction due to each of these hemispheres at P, a point on the 
 perpendicular erected to AB at (7, if CP= a. 
 
 10. Considering the earth a sphere whose density varies only 
 with the distance from the centre, what may we infer about the 
 law of change of this density if a pendulum swing with the same 
 period on the surface of the earth and at the bottom of a deep 
 mine ? What if the force of attraction increases with the depth 
 
 at the rate of th of a dyne per centimetre of descent? 
 n 
 
 11. The attraction due to a cylindrical tube of length h and 
 of radii 72 and R^ at a point in the axis, at a distance c from 
 the plane of the nearer end, is 
 
 27rp[Vc 2 +^ 1 2 -V^+^ 2 +V(c +70 2 +^o 2 -V(c +/0 2 +^i 2 ]- 
 
 [Stone.] 
 
 12. A spherical cavity of radius b is hollowed out in a sphere 
 of radius a and density p, and then completely filled with 
 matter, of density p . If c is the distance between the centre 
 of the cavity and the centre of the sphere, the attraction due 
 to the composite solid at a point in the line joining these two 
 centres, at a distance d from the centre of the sphere, is 
 
 13. The centre of a sphere of aluminum of radius 10 and of 
 density 2.5, is at the distance 100 from a sphere of the same
 
 THE ATTRACTION OF GRAVITATION. 27 
 
 size made of gold, of density 19. Show that the attraction 
 due to these spheres is nothing at a point between them, at a 
 distance of about 26.6 from the centre of the aluminum sphere. 
 
 [Stone.] 
 
 14. Show that the attraction at the centre of a sphere of radius 
 r, from which a piece has been cut by a cone of revolution 
 whose vertex is at the centre, is irpr sin 2 a, where a is the 
 half angle of the cone. [Stone.] 
 
 15. An iron sphere of radius 10 and density 7 has an eccentric 
 spherical cavity of radius 6, whose centre is at a distance 3 
 from the centre of the sphere. Find the attraction due to 
 this solid at a point 25 units from the centre of the sphere, 
 and so situated that the line joining it with this centre makes 
 an angle of 45 with the line joining the centre of the sphere 
 and the centre of the cavity. [Stone.] 
 
 16. If the piece of a spherical shell of radii r and i\, inter- 
 cepted by a cone of revolution whose solid angle is w and whose 
 vertex is the centre of the shell, be cut out and removed, find 
 the attraction of the remainder of the shell at a point P situated 
 in the axis of the cone at a given distance from the centre of 
 the sphere. If in the vertical shaft of a mine a pendulum be 
 swung, is there any appreciable error in assuming that the only 
 matter whose attraction influences the pendulum lies nearer the 
 centre of the earth, supposed spherical, than the pendulum 
 does ? 
 
 17. Show that the attraction of a spherical segment is, at its 
 vertex, 
 
 , / f 1 1 l*h } 
 
 -sVirJ' 
 
 where a is the radius of the sphere and h the height of the 
 segment. . 
 
 18. Show that the resultant attraction of a spherical segment 
 on a particle at the centre of its base is 
 
 2irhp , [3 a 2 - 3 ah + h-- (2 a - h) 3 M] . 
 3 (a A) 1
 
 28 THE ATTRACTION OF GRAVITATION. 
 
 19. Show that the attraction at the focus of a segment of a 
 paraboloid of revolution bounded by a plane perpendicular to 
 the axis at a distance 6 from the vertex is of the form 
 
 ' 20. Show that the attraction of the oblate spheroid formed 
 by the revolution of the ellipse of semiaxes a, &, and eccen- 
 tricity e, is, at the pole of the spheroid, 
 
 ( 
 j 1 
 
 e- (. e 
 
 and that the attraction due to the corresponding prolate spheroid 
 is, at its pole, 
 
 47iy>a(l e' 
 
 2e ' 1-e 
 
 21. Show that the attraction at the point (c, 0, 0), due to 
 the homogeneous solid bounded l>y the planes x = a, x = 6, and 
 by the surface generated by the revolution about the axis of x 
 of the curve y =/(#) , is 
 
 2 7r pf 5 jl -- ^^ - I 
 
 y. i [(c-ao'+c/s) 8 ]*) 
 
 dx. 
 
 - 22. Prove that the attraction of a uniform lamina in the form 
 of a rectangle, at a point P in the straight line drawn through 
 the centre of the lamina at right angles to its plane, is 
 
 i ab 
 
 4 //, sin 
 
 where 2 a and 2 6 are the dimensions of the lamina and c the 
 distance of P from its plane. [See Todhunter's Analytical 
 Statics.']
 
 THE NEWTONIAN POTENTIAL FUNCTION. 29 
 
 CHAPTER II. 
 
 THE NEWTONIAN POTENTIAL JUNCTION IN THE CASE 
 OP GRAVITATION. 
 
 19. Definition. If we imagine an attracting body M to be 
 cut up into small elements, and add together all the fractions 
 formed by dividing the mass of each element by the distance of 
 one of its points from a given point P in space, the limit of this 
 sum, as the elements are made smaller and smaller, is called the 
 value at P of " the potential function due to 3f." 
 
 If we call this quantity V, we have 
 
 where A??i is the mass of one of the elements and r its distance 
 from P, and where the summation is to include all the elements 
 which go to make up M. 
 
 If we denote by ~p the average density of the element whose 
 mass is A??t, and call the coordinates of the corner of this ele- 
 ment nearest the origin a;', y', z', and those of P, a, y, z, we may 
 write 
 
 Am = 
 and 
 
 = C C C 
 J J J 
 
 _ 
 \_(x'-xy+(y'-y) 2 +(z'-zy]S 
 
 where p is the density at the point (V, y', z'} , and where the 
 triple integration is to include the whole of the attracting mass M. 
 
 As the position of the point P changes, the value of the quan- 
 tity under the integral signs in [47] changes, and in general V 
 is a function of the three space coordinates, i.e., V=f(x, y,z). 
 
 To avoid circumlocution, a point at which the value of the
 
 30 THE NEWTONIAN POTENTIAL FUNCTION 
 
 potential function is F is sometimes said to be "at potential 
 F ." From the definition of Fit is evident that if the value at 
 a point P of the potential function due to a system of masses 
 M t existing alone is FI, and if the value at the same point of 
 the potential function due to another system of masses M~ 2 exist- 
 ing alone is F 2 , the value at P of the potential function due to 
 M { and M z existing together is V= Fi + F 2 . 
 
 20. The Derivatives of the Potential Function. If P is a 
 point outside the attracting mass, the quantity 
 
 which enters into the expression for V in [47], can never be 
 zero, and the quantity under the integral signs is finite every- 
 where within the limits of integration ; now, since these limits 
 depend only upon the shape and position of the attracting mass 
 and have nothing to do with the coordinates of P, we may dif- 
 ferentiate V with respect to either x, ?/, or z by differentiating 
 under the integral signs. Thus : 
 
 = f f f p(x'-x)a 
 
 JJJ [(x'xy 2 +(y' 
 
 x}dx'dy'dz' 
 
 where the limits of integration are unchanged by the differen- 
 tiation. The dexter integral in this equation is (Section 14) 
 the value of the component parallel to the axis of x of the 
 attraction at P due to the given masses, so that we may write, 
 using our old notation, 
 
 D,V=X, [49] 
 
 and, similarly, D y V=Y, [50] 
 
 D,V=Z. [51] 
 
 The resultant attraction at P is 
 
 2 , [52]
 
 IN THE CASE OF GRAVITATION. 31 
 
 and the direction-cosines of its line of action are : 
 
 D V D V D V 
 
 cosa = *- , cos/3 = j^-, and cosy = * [53] 
 UK R 
 
 It is evident from the definition of the potential function that 
 the value of the latter at any point is independent of the par- 
 ticular system of rectangular axes chosen. If, then, we wish to 
 find the component, in the direction of any line, of the attraction 
 at any point P, we may choose one of our coordinate axes 
 parallel to this line, and, after computing the general value of 
 V, we may differentiate the latter partially with respect to the 
 coordinate measured on the axis in question, and substitute in 
 the result the coordinates of P. 
 
 21. Theorem. The results of the last section may be summed 
 up in the words of the following 
 
 THEOREM. 
 
 To find the component at a point P, in any direction PAT, of 
 the attraction due to any attracting mass M, ice may divide the 
 difference betiveen the values of the potential function due to M at 
 P 1 (a point beticeen P and K on the straight line PA") and at P 
 by the distance PP'. The limit approached by this fraction as 
 P' approaches P is the component required. 
 
 "We might have arrived at this theorem in the following way : 
 If X, I", Z are the components parallel to the coordinate axes 
 
 of the attraction at any point P, the component in any direction 
 
 PA" whose direction-cosines are A, /A, and v, is 
 
 XX + p. V+ vZ = XD Z V+ p.D y V+ i'D, V. [54] 
 
 Let x, y, z be the coordinates of P, and x -f A#, y -f Ay, 
 z -\- Az those of P', a neighboring point on the line PA". 
 
 If ^and V are the values of the potential function at P and 
 P' respectively, we have, by Taylor's Theorem, 
 
 V = V+ A* D Z V+ Ay .D, V+ \z - D, V + c, 
 where e is an infinitesimal of an order higher than the first.
 
 32 
 
 THE NEWTONIAN POTENTIAL FUNCTION 
 
 but 
 
 therefore, pQ 
 
 = XD * V + t* D * 
 
 and this (see [54]) is the component in the direction PK of 
 the attraction at P : which was to be proved. 
 
 22. The Potential Function everywhere Finite. If P is a 
 
 point within the attracting mass, the sum whose limit expresses 
 the value of the potential function at P contains one apparently 
 infinite term. That V is not infinite in this case is easily 
 proved by making P the origin of a system of polar coordinates 
 as in Section 15, when it will appear that the value of the 
 potential function at P can be expressed in the form 
 
 V P = C C C P rsin6drd0d<l>', 
 
 [57] 
 
 and this is evidently finite. 
 
 Although V P is everywhere finite, yet when we express its 
 value by means of the equation [47], the quantity under the in- 
 tegral signs becomes infinite within the limits of integration, 
 
 when P is a point inside the attracting mass. Under these cir- 
 cumstances we cannot assume without further proof that the 
 result obtained by differentiating with respect to x under the 
 integral signs is really D X V. It is therefore desirable to com-
 
 IN THE CASE OF GRAVITATION. 33 
 
 pute the limit of the ratio of the difference (A X F) between the 
 values of V at the points P'=(:c-|- Az, ?/, z) and P=(a?, y, z), 
 both within the attracting mass, to the distance (A#) between 
 these points. For convenience, draw through P (Fig. 15) three 
 lines parallel to the coordinate axes, and let Q = (#', y', z'). 
 
 Let PQ = r, P*Q = r', and X'PQ = f. 
 
 Then 
 
 r' 2 = ^-^-(AiE) 2 2 r Aa cos i/^, 
 
 np' /j* 
 
 where cos \/ = , 
 
 -, A...F C C rA 1\ pdx'dy 
 
 ana = i | ( - 
 
 Ax J J J \r' rj Ax 
 
 m rcf(.=- 
 
 J J J Vr'r 2 + rr'- 
 
 Ax 
 
 '2 ? Ax cos \l/ (Ax) *\ p dx' dy' dz' 
 
 rr' 2 J Ax 
 Therefore 
 
 D F= ^ m ^ 
 
 ; ' cos ^. [58] 
 
 This last integral is evidently the component parallel to the 
 axis of x of the attraction at P, so that the theorem of Article 
 21 may be extended to points within the attracting mass. 
 
 It is to be noticed that p is a function of a:', y', and z', but not 
 a function of x, y, and z, and that we have really proved that the 
 derivatives with regard to x, ?/, and z of
 
 34 
 
 THE NEWTONIAN POTENTIAL FUNCTION 
 
 where F is any finite, continuous, and single-valued function of 
 a;', ?/', and z', can always be found by differentiating under the 
 integral signs, whether (x,y,z) is contained within the limits of 
 integration or not. 
 
 23. The Potential Function due to a Straight Wire. Let 
 fj. be the mass of the unit length of a uniform straight wire AS 
 (Fig. 16) of length 21. Take the middle point of the wire for 
 the origin of coordinates, and a line drawn perpendicular to the 
 wire at this point for the axis of x. 
 
 The value of the potential function at any point P (x, y) in 
 the coordinate plane is, then, according to [47], 
 
 =r 
 
 J-i 
 
 If r = AP = 
 
 and r' = BP = 
 
 whence y = 
 
 ig 
 
 4J 
 
 , we may eliminate x and y from [59] and 
 
 express V P in terms of r and r'. 
 Thus: 
 
 It is evident from [GO] that if P move so as to keep the sum 
 of its distances from the ends of the wire constant, V P will
 
 IN THE CASE OF GRAVITATION. 35 
 
 remain constant. P's locus in this case is an ellipse whose 
 foci are at A and B. 
 From [59] we get 
 
 n y _ 
 
 L-'* r P 
 
 = - 1 
 
 *L 
 
 cos 8 1 cos 8' 
 
 = f cos 8 + cos 8' 1, 
 asj_ J 
 
 and this (Section G). is the component in the direction of the 
 axis of x of the attraction at P. 
 
 24. The Potential Function due to a Spherical Shell. In 
 order to find the value at the point P of the potential function 
 due to a homogeneous spherical shell of densit}' p and of radii r 
 and *!, we may make use of the notation of Section 9. 
 
 C r f prsinB dr dQ d^ C C CP T d>/ d 
 = JJJ y~ ~ = J J J 'c 
 
 If P lies within the cavity enclosed by the shell, the limits of 
 y are (r c) and (r-j-c), whence 
 
 F=27rp(r 1 2 -r 2 ). [02] 
 
 If P lies without the shell, the limits of y are (c r) and 
 (c + y) 5 whence 
 
 F=-7rp (ri3 ~ r 3) - [63] 
 
 3 c 
 
 If P is a point within the mass of the shell itself, at a dis- 
 tance c from the centre, we may divide the shell into two parts
 
 36 
 
 THE NEWTONIAN POTENTIAL FUNCTION 
 
 by means of a spherical surface drawn concentric with the given 
 shell so as to pass through P. The value of the potential func- 
 tion at P is the sum of the components due to these portions of 
 the shell ; therefore 
 
 3 c 
 
 [64] 
 
 If we put these results together, we shall have the following 
 table : 
 
 
 c>r Q 
 
 r <c< i\ 
 
 r><c 
 
 F= 
 
 27r/D(r 1 2 r 2 ) 
 
 '*P\ri -J 3c ^o 
 
 4 7Tp f r 3 r 3\ 
 
 n vi r o ) 
 
 OC 
 
 
 
 
 ? \ 
 
 
 D C V= 
 
 
 
 31 o j 
 \ c ~ / 
 
 ~ 3c 2 ^ ~ 
 
 D 2 V = 
 
 
 
 _47rp/2r ( 3 \ 
 
 S *P( r s r a\ 
 
 
 
 3 \ c 3 ) 
 
 3J 
 
 If we make F, -D C F, 'and D c 2 Fthe ordinates of curves whose 
 abscissas are c, we get Fig. 17.* 
 
 Here LNQS represents F", and it is to be noticed that this 
 curve is everywhere finite, continuous, and continuous in direc- 
 tion. The curve OABC represents D C V. This curve is every- 
 where finite and continuous, but its direction changes abruptly 
 when the point P enters or leaves the attracting mass. The 
 three disconnected lines OA, DE, and FG represent D?V. 
 
 If the density of the shell instead of being uniform were a 
 function of the distance from the centre \_p =/(?')] 5 we should 
 have at the point P, at the distance c from the centre of the 
 
 8 P here ' 
 
 [65] 
 ?/ 
 
 See Thomson and Tait's Treatise on Natural Philosophy.
 
 IN THE CASE OF GRAVITATION. 
 
 37 
 
 From this it follows, as the reader can easily prove, that the 
 value of the potential function due to a spherical shell whose 
 density is a Junction of the distance from the centre only is 
 
 FIG. 17. 
 
 constant throughout the cavity enclosed b}- the shell, and at all 
 outside points is the same as if the mass of the shell were con- 
 centrated at its centre. 
 
 25. Equipotential Surfaces. As we have already seen, V is, in 
 general, a function of the three space coordinates [_V=f(x,y,z)\, 
 and in any given case all these points at which the potential 
 function has the particular value c lie on the surface whose 
 
 equation is T7 - ~, 
 
 V=f(x,y,z) = c. 
 
 Such a surface is called an " equipotential " or " level " sur- 
 face. By giving to c in succession different constant values, 
 the equation V c yields a whole family of surfaces, and it is 
 always possible to draw through any given point in a field of 
 force a surface at all points of which the potential function has 
 the same value. The potential function cannot have two differ- 
 ent values at the same point in space, therefore no two different 
 surfaces of the family F"=c, where V is .the potential function 
 due to an actual distribution of matter, can ever intersect. 
 
 105460
 
 38 THE NEWTONIAN POTENTIAL FUNCTION 
 
 THEOREM. 
 
 If there be any resultant force at a point in space, due to any 
 attracting masses, this force acts along the normal to that equi- 
 potential surface on which the point lies. 
 
 For, let V=f(x, y,z) = c be the equation of the equipotential 
 surface drawn through the point in question, and let the coordi- 
 nates of this point be X Q , y , Z Q . The equation of the, plane 
 tangent to the surface at the point is 
 
 and the direction-cosines of any line perpendicular to this plane, 
 and hence of the normal to the given surface at the point 
 
 cos a = x " , [66 A ] 
 
 cos/3 = 
 
 and cos y = z<) 
 
 But if we denote the resultant force of attraction at the point 
 (x , 2/ , ZQ) by R, and its components parallel to the coordinate 
 axes by X, Y, and Z, these cosines are evidently equal to 
 
 X Y Z 
 
 , , and respectively, so that a, /?, and y are the direction- 
 R R H 
 
 angles not only of the normal to the equipotential surface at the 
 point (a: , j/ , z ) , but also [35] of the line of action of the re- 
 sultant force at the point. Hence our theorem. 
 
 Fig. 18 represents a meridian section of four of the system 
 of equipotential surfaces due to two equal spheres whose sec- 
 tions are here shaded. The value of the potential function due 
 to two spheres, each of mass M, at a point distant respectively 
 T! and r 2 from the centres of the spheres, is
 
 IN THE CASE OF GRAVITATION. 
 
 39 
 
 and if we give to V in this equation different constant values, 
 we shall have the equations of different members of the system 
 of equipotential surfaces. Any one of these surfaces ma}* be 
 easily plotted from its equation by finding corresponding values 
 
 FIG. 18. 
 
 of r^ and r 2 which will satisfy the equation ; and then, with the 
 centres of the two spheres as centres and these values as radii, 
 describing two spherical surfaces. The intersection of these 
 surfaces, if they intersect at all, will be a line on the surface 
 required. 
 
 If 2 a is the distance between the centres of the spheres, 
 
 2 V 
 
 V = - gives an equipotential surface shaped like an hour- 
 a 
 
 glass. Larger values of V than this give equipotential sur- 
 faces, each one of which consists of two separate closed ovals, 
 one surrounding one of the spheres, and the other the other. 
 
 Values of V less than give single surfaces which look more 
 
 a 
 
 and more like ellipsoids the smaller V is. 
 
 Several diagrams showing the forms of the equipotential 
 surfaces due to different distributions of matter are given at
 
 40 THE NEWTONIAN POTENTIAL FUNCTION 
 
 the end of the first volume of Maxwell's Treatise on Electricity 
 and Magnetism. 
 
 26. The Value of V at Infinity. The value, at the point P, 
 of the potential function due to any attracting mass M has 
 
 been defined to be 
 
 _ limit 
 
 Let r be the distance of the nearest point of the attracting 
 mass from P, then 
 
 or . [67] 
 
 r 
 
 M 
 
 The fraction has a constant numerator, and a denominator 
 
 n 
 which grows larger without limit the farther P is removed from 
 
 the attracting masses ; hence, we see that, other things being 
 equal, the value at P of the potential function is smaller the 
 farther P is from the attracting matter ; and that if P be moved 
 away indefinitely, the value of the potential function at P 
 approaches zero as a limit. In other words, the value of the 
 potential function at "infinity" is zero. 
 
 27. The Potential Function as a Measure of Work. The 
 
 amount of work required to move a unit mass, concentrated at 
 a point, from one position, P t , to another, P 2 , by any path, in 
 face of the attraction of a system of masses, Jf, is equal to 
 
 FIG. 19. 
 
 Vi V-i, where V\ and F 2 are the values at PI and P 2 of the 
 potential function due to M. 
 
 To prove this, let us divide the. given path into equal parts 
 of length As, and call the average force which opposes the
 
 IN THE CASE OF GRAVITATION. 41 
 
 motion of the unit mass on its journey along one of these 
 elements AB (Fig. 19), F. The amount of work required to 
 move the unit mass from A to B is .FAs, and the whole work 
 done by moving this mass from P x to P 2 will be 
 
 limit "\.^ ^'T-T A 
 
 **2** 
 
 As As is made smaller and smaller, the average force opposing 
 the motion along AB approaches more and more nearly the 
 actual opposing force at A, which is D,V: therefore 
 
 limit 
 As =C 
 
 = - f P *A v- ds = r, - 
 
 J Pv 
 
 It is to be carefully noticed that the decrease in the potential 
 function in moving from Pj to P 2 measures the work required 
 to move the unit mass from P l to P 2 . If P 2 is removed farther 
 and farther from J/, F 2 approaches zero, and V\ V., approaches 
 Fj as its limit, so that the value at any point Pj, of the poten- 
 tial function due to any system of attracting masses, is equal 
 to the work which would be required to move a unit mass, sup- 
 posed concentrated at P n from Pj to " infinity" by any path. 
 
 The work (IF) that must be done in order to move an attract- 
 ing mass J/' against the attraction of any other mass J/, from 
 a given position by any path to " infinity," is the sum of the 
 quantities of work required to move th6 several elements (A?n f ) 
 into which we may divide J/', and this may be written in the 
 form 
 
 limit ' _J>dxd>,dz_ 
 
 w _ 
 
 -m* 
 
 pp'dxdydzdtfdy'dz 1 
 
 CCCCCC pp 
 
 = J J J J J J {.(*'-*)* 
 
 W is called by some writers "the potential of the mass M' 
 with reference to the mass J/" ; by others, the negative of ir is 
 called "the mutual potential energy of Jfand M'." 
 
 lu many of the later books on this subject, the word
 
 42 THE NEWTONIAN POTENTIAL FUNCTION 
 
 "potential" is never used for the A'alue of the potential func- 
 tion at a point, but is reserved to denote the work required to 
 move a mass from some present position to infinity. If V is 
 the value of the potential function at a point P, at which a 
 mass m is supposed to be concentrated, mV is the potential 
 of the mass m. If we could have a unit mass concentrated 
 at a point, the potential of this mass and the value of tlie poten- 
 tial function at the point would be numerically identical. 
 
 28. Laplace's Equation. We have seen that the value of the 
 potential function and the component in any direction of the 
 attraction at the point P are always finite functions of the space 
 coordinates, whether P is inside, outside, or at the surface of 
 the attracting masses. We have seen also that by differentiating 
 V at any point with respect to any direction we may find the 
 always finite component in that direction of the attraction at 
 the point. It follows that D X V, D y V, D Z V are everywhere 
 finite, and that, in consequence of this, the potential function 
 is everywhere continuous as well as finite. 
 
 If P is a point outside of the attracting masses, the quantity 
 under the integral signs in [48], by which dx'dy'dz' is multi- 
 plied, cannot be infinite within the limits of integration, and we 
 can find D^V by differentiating the expression for D X V under 
 the integral signs. 
 
 In this case 
 
 Dj* V = C C p^'-ft) 2 -?^ dx'dy'dz', [69] 
 
 and similarly, 
 
 D? V = 3 (V ' ~?^P dx'dy'dz', [70] 
 
 D* V = -~ P dx'dy'dz'. [71] 
 
 Whence, for all points exterior to the attracting masses, 
 
 =0. [72] 
 
 This is Laplace's Equation.
 
 IX THE CASE OF GRAVITATION. 43 
 
 The operator (D x 2 + D* + Z>/) is sometimes denoted l)y the 
 symbol V 2 , so that [72] may be written 
 
 V 2 F=0. [73] 
 
 The potential function, due to every conceivable distribution 
 of matter, must be such that at all points in emptv space 
 Laplace's Equation shall be satisfied. 
 
 29. The Second Derivatives of the Potential Function are 
 Finite at Points within the Attracting Mass. If the point P 
 lies within the attracting mass, F"aiid D X V are finite, but the 
 quantity under the integral signs in the expression for D X V 
 becomes infinite within the limits of integration, and we cannot 
 assume that D/V may be found by differentiating D Z V under 
 the integral signs. In order to find D?V under these circum- 
 stances, it is convenient to transform the equation for D X V* 
 Let us choose our coordinate axes so as to have all the attract- 
 ing mass in the first octant, and divide the projection of the 
 contour of this mass on the plane yz into elements (dy'dz'). 
 Upon each one of these elements let us erect a right prism, 
 cutting the mass twice or some other even number of times. 
 Consider one of the elements cly'dz' whose corner next the 
 origin has the coordinates 0, ?/', and z'. The prism erected on 
 this element cuts out elements ds^ f?.*>, ds s , c?s 4 , ds 2n from the 
 surface of the attracting mass and that edge of the prism which 
 is perpendicular to the plane yz at (0, //', z') cuts into the 
 surface at points whose distances from the plane of yz are 
 n <*3i 5? " 2-i? an d out f the surface at points whose dis- 
 tances from the same plane are a*, a, 6 , (t., n . At every one 
 of these points of intersection draw normals towards the interior 
 of the attracting mass, and call the angles which these normals 
 make with the positive direction of the axis of .r, ,, cu, a 3 . 2n . 
 It is to be noticed that a,, a n , a 5 , o 2n _! are all acute, and that 
 a 2 , cz 4 , a 6 , cu,, are all obtuse. The element dy'dz' may be re- 
 garded as the common projection of the surface elements
 
 44 
 
 THE NEWTONIAN POTENTIAL FUNCTION 
 
 dsj, ds 2 , ds s , ' ds 2n , and, so far as absolute value is concerned, 
 the following equations hold approximately : 
 
 dy'dz'= 
 
 = ds 2 cosa 2 = ds s cosa 3 = = ds 2n cosa 2n . 
 
 But cfa/'cZz', ds l5 ds 2 , ds 3 , etc., are all positive areas, and cosa 2 , 
 cosa 4 , cosa 6 , etc., are negative, so that, paying attention to 
 signs as well as to absolute values, we have 
 
 dy'dz'= 
 
 cosa 4 = etc. 
 
 FIG. 20. 
 
 Now 
 J.\.V= 
 
 'dy'dz 
 
 and in order to find the value of this expression by the 
 use of the prisms just described, we are to cut each one 
 of these prisms into elementary rectangular parallelepipeds by 
 planes parallel to the plane of yz ; we are to multiply the 
 values of every one of these elements which lies within the 
 
 attracting mass by the value of pDJl j at its corner next 
 
 V rJ 
 the origin [i.e., at (a %/ , ?/', z')] ; and we are to find the limit of 
 
 the sum of these as dx' is made smaller and smaller. We are 
 then to compute a like expression for each of the other prisms, 
 and to find the limit of the sum of the whole as the bases of the
 
 IN THE CASE OF GRAVITATION. 45 
 
 prisms are made smaller and smaller and their number corres- 
 pondingly increased. 
 
 Wherever the function is a continuous and finite function 
 of a?', we have 
 
 r r 
 
 hence, if the elementary prisms cut the surface of the attracting 
 mass only twice, 
 
 x'= o a 
 
 *=, 
 and, in general, 
 
 = f fdy 
 JJ 
 
 + C CC-DJpdx'dy'dz 1 [76] 
 
 Zl Pi P PS 
 
 COSajdtej-l -- -COSa.,C?S<H -- COS03<is 3 H ---- 
 \ ? 'l 7 '2 r Z 
 
 y'dz', [77] 
 
 P* P 
 
 where is the value of the quantity - at the point where the 
 r k " T 
 
 line y = y', z = 2;' t cuts the surface of the attracting mass for the 
 frth time, counting from the plane yz. 
 
 In order to find the value of the limit of the sum which occurs 
 in this expression, it is evident that we may divide the entire sur- 
 face of the attracting mass into elements, multiply the area of each 
 
 element by the value of ^ at one of its points, and find the 
 
 r 
 limit of the sum formed by adding all these products together ; 
 
 but this is equivalent to the surface integral of ^ - taken all 
 over the outside of the attracting mass, so that 
 
 D X V= cosads +dx'dy'dz\ [78]
 
 46 THE NEWTONIAN POTENTIAL FUNCTION 
 
 where the first integral is to be taken all over the surface of the 
 attracting mass and the second throughout its volume. This 
 expression for D x Vis in some. cases more convenient than that 
 of [48]. 
 
 We have proved this transformation to be correct, however, 
 
 only when is finite throughout the attracting mass. If P is a 
 
 point within the mass, - is infinite at P. In this case surround 
 r 
 
 P by a spherical surface of radius e small enough to make the 
 whole sphere enclosed by this surface lie entirely within the 
 attracting mass. This is possible unless P lies exactly upon 
 the surface of the attracting mass. Shutting out the little 
 sphere, let V 2 be the potential function due to the rest (T 2 ) of 
 the attracting mass ; then, since P is an outside point with re- 
 gard to T 2 , we have, by [78], 
 
 D x V 2 =f~ cosa da' + f cos a ds + fff~r- dx'dy'dz', [79] 
 
 where the first integral is to be extended over the spherical 
 surface, which forms a part of the boundary of the attracting 
 
 FIG. 21. 
 
 mass to which V 2 is due ; the second integral is to be taken 
 over all the rest of the bounding surface of the attracting mass ; 
 and the triple integral embraces the volume of all the attracting 
 mass which gives rise to V 2 . 
 
 As e is made smaller and smaller, V 2 approaches more and 
 more nearly the potential function F, due to all the attracting 
 
 mass. 
 
 /p 
 - cos a ds', cos a can never be greater than 1 
 
 nor less than 1 , so that if ~p is the greatest value of p on the
 
 IN THE CASE OF GRAVITATION. 47 
 
 surface of the sphere, the absolute value of the integral must be 
 
 P C 
 
 less than -I ds' or 47rpe, and the limit of this as e approaches 
 
 zero is zero. The second integral in [79] is unaltered by any 
 change in . If we make P the origin of a system of polar 
 coordinates, it is evident that the triple integral in [79] may be 
 
 written C C C 
 
 \ \ \ D x ' P -rs'mOdrdOd<l>, [80] 
 
 and the limit which this approaches as e is made smaller and 
 smaller is evidently finite, for, if r = 0, the quantity under the 
 integral sign is zero. 
 Therefore, 
 
 JSo D X V 2 = D X V= / cosads + fff^dx'dy'dz', [81] 
 
 and [79] is true even when P lies within the attracting mass. 
 Under the same conditions we have, similarly, 
 
 ^dx'dy'dz', [82] 
 
 and 
 
 D z V= cos yds + dx'dy'dz 1 . [83] 
 
 Observing that in these surface integrals r can never be zero, 
 since we have excluded the case where P lies on the surface of 
 the attracting mass, and that the triple integrals belong to the 
 class mentioned in the latter part of Section 22, we will differ- 
 entiate [81], [82], and [83] with respect to x, y, and z respec- 
 tively, by differentiating under the integral signs. If the results 
 are finite, we may consider the process allowable. 
 
 Performin the work indicated, we have 
 
 D*V= Cpcosa-D x (-]ds+ C 
 J \rj J 
 
 C C CD,( } -\ D,' p . dx'dy'dz'. [86] 
 J J */ '
 
 48 THE NEWTONIAN POTENTIAL FUNCTION 
 
 and by making P the centre of a system of polar coordinates 
 and transforming all the triple integrals, it is easy to show that 
 the values of D X V, D*V, D?V here found are finite whether 
 P is within or without the attracting mass. This result* is 
 important. 
 
 30. The Derivatives of the Potential Function at the Surface 
 of the Attracting Mass. Let the point P lie on the surface 
 of the attracting mass, or at some other point or surface where 
 p is discontinuous. Make P the centre of a sphere of radius e, 
 and call the piece which this sphere cuts out of the attracting 
 mass T! and the remainder of this mass T 2 . Let Fi and V 2 be 
 the potential functions due respectively to TI and T 2 ? then 
 
 V=V i + V 2 , D x V=D x V i +D x V 2 , 
 
 and the increment [A(Z> Z F")] made in D X V by moving from P 
 to a neighboring point P', inside Tj, is equal to the sum of the 
 corresponding increments [A^^Fi) and A(Z> X F 2 )] made in 
 D x Vi and D,V 3 . 
 
 With reference to the space T 2 , P is an outside point, so that 
 the values at P of the first derivatives of F" 2 with respect to a;, 
 y, and z are continuous functions of the space coordinates and 
 
 Let d<a be the solid angle of an elementary cone whose vertex 
 is at any fixed point in T t used as a centre of coordinates. 
 
 FIG. 22. 
 
 The element of mass will be pi^dwdr. The component in the 
 direction of the axis of x of the attraction at due to 7\ is the 
 
 * Lejeune Dirichlet, Vbrlesungen iiber die im umgekehrten Verhdltniss des 
 Quadrats der Entfernuntj ivirkenden Krafte. 
 
 Riemann, Schwere, Electricitdt, und Magnetismus.
 
 IX THE CASE OF GRAVITATION. 49 
 
 limit of the sum taken throughout J\ of - , where a is 
 
 r 
 
 the cosine of the angle which the line joining with the element 
 in question makes with the axis of x. The difference between 
 the limits of o> is not greater than 4?r, and the difference be- 
 tween the limits of r is not greater than 2e. If, then, K is the 
 greatest value which pa has in T^ 
 
 It follows from this that if P' is a point within 7\ so that 
 PP'< e, the change made in D x Vi by going from P to P' is far 
 less than lG7r*e; but this last quantity can be made as small as 
 we like by making small enough, so that 
 
 limit \ / T\ -IT \ i\ 
 p p / ^ A(Z> I F 1 ) = 0, 
 
 whence 
 
 limit A / T~> TT"V limit / T~ TT"\ i limit / T~ rr\ /~v 
 
 A (D x F) = pp/=o A ( D * F + PP'^o A (A V*) = 0, 
 
 and -D^F varies continuously in passing through P. In a similar 
 manner, it may be proved that D y V and D Z V are everywhere, 
 even at places where the density is discontinuous, continuous 
 functions of the space coordinates. 
 
 The results of the work of the last two sections are well illus- 
 trated by Fig. 17. We might prove, with 'the help of a trans- 
 formation due to Clausius,* that the second derivatives of the 
 potential function are finite at all points on the surface of the 
 attracting matter where the curvature is finite, but that these 
 derivatives generally change their values abruptly whenever the 
 point P crosses a surface at which p is discontinuous, as at the 
 surface of the attracting masses. The fact, however, that this 
 last is true in the special case of a homogeneous spherical shell 
 suffices to show that we cannot expect the second derivatives 
 of V to have definite values at the boundaries of attracting 
 bodies. 
 
 * Die Potentialfuncllon nnd das Potential, 19-24.
 
 50 
 
 THE NEWTONIAN POTENTIAL FUNCTION 
 
 31. Gauss's Theorem. If any closed surface T drawn in a 
 field or force be divided up into a large number of surface 
 elements, and if each one of these elements be multiplied by the 
 component, in the direction of the interior normals of the force 
 of attraction at a point of the element, and if these products be 
 added together, the limit of the sum thus obtained is called the 
 '' surface integral of normal attraction over T" 
 
 If any closed surface T be described so as to shut in com- 
 pletely a mass m concentrated at a point, the surface integral 
 of normal attraction due to m, taken over T, is 4?rm; and, in 
 general, if any closed surface T bo described so as to shut in 
 completely any system of attracting masses J/, the surface in- 
 tegral over T of the normal attraction due to M is 
 
 In order to prove this, divide T up into surface elements, 
 and consider one of these ds at Q. The attraction at Q in the 
 
 direction QO, due to the mass m concentrated at 0, is -^- = 
 
 QO 2 r 2 
 The component of this in the direction of the interior normal is 
 
 *w? 
 
 cosa, and the contribution which ds yields to the sum whose 
 
 m cos a ds 
 
 Connect 
 
 limit is the surface integral required is 
 
 T~ 
 
 every point of the perimeter of ds with by a straight line, 
 thus forming a cone of such size as to cut out of a spherical 
 surface of unit radius drawn about an element c?o>, say. If we 
 draw about a sphere of radius r = OQ, the cone will intercept 
 on its surface an element equal to r^-dta. This element is the
 
 IN THE CASE OF GRAVITATION. 51 
 
 projection on the spherical surface of ds ; hence d$cosa = rvicu, 
 approximately, and the contribution of the element ds to our 
 surface integral is mcZu>. But an elementary cone may cut the 
 surface more than once ; indeed, any odd number of times. Con- 
 sider such a cone, one element of which cuts the surface thrice 
 in SL, S 2 , and S 3 . Let 0/5^ OS 2 , and OS S be called r 1? r 2 , and 
 r 3 respectively, and let the surface elements cut out of T by the 
 cone be dsi, eZs 2 , and cZs 3 , and the angles between the line S 3 
 and the interior normals to T at >Sj, S z , and S 3 be a 1? a 2 , a 3 . It is 
 to be noticed that when the cone cuts out of T 7 , the corresponding 
 angle is acute, and that when it cuts in, the corresponding angle 
 is obtuse, aj and a 3 are acute, and a, 2 obtuse. If we draw about 
 three spherical surfaces with radii r l5 r 2 , and r 3 respectively, 
 the cone will cut out of these the elements rfdw, r.?dw. and 
 r s -d<a. In absolute size, c/Sj = ?- 1 2 c?w secoj, ds. 2 = ?vdo> seca 2 , and 
 ds 3 = r^dta seca 3 , approximately, but ds. 2 and rdw are both posi- 
 tive, being areas, and seca 2 is negative. Taking account of 
 sign, then, cZs 2 = i" 2 dw sec a 2 , and the cone's three elements 
 3 - ield to the surface integral of normal attraction the quantity 
 
 / ds, COS a, . d* COS ao . C^., COS a,\ , 7 , 7 , , 
 
 (m - + - ) = m (aw w + aw) = m w. 
 
 v -f >v v y 
 
 However many times the cone cuts T, it will yield ??ic7o) to the 
 surface integral required : all such elementary cones will yield 
 
 then m ^ (7w = m-lw if T is closed, and, in general, ra0, when 
 
 is the solid angle which T subtends at 0. 
 
 If, instead of a mass concentrated at a point, we have any 
 distribution of masses, we may divide these into elements, and 
 apply to each element the theorem just proved ; hence our gen- 
 eral statement. 
 
 If from a point without a closed surface T an elementary 
 cone be drawn, the cone, if it cuts T 7 at all, will cut it an even 
 number of times. Using the notation just explained, the con- 
 tribution which any such cone will yield to the surface integral 
 taken over T of a mass m concentrated at is
 
 52 THE NEWTONIAN POTENTIAL FUNCTION 
 
 / dSi COS ci! . ds 2 COS a 2 , ds 3 COS a 3 , ds 4 COS a 4 \ 
 
 ( 2 2 ' T2 ' 2 I " ' J 
 
 \ 1 2 4 / 
 
 = m( da) -j- dco dw + d<o ) = m- = 0, 
 
 and the surface integral over any closed surface of the normal 
 attraction due to any system of outside masses is zero. 
 
 The results proved above may be put together and stated in 
 the form of a 
 
 THEOREM DUE TO GAUSS. 
 
 If there be any distribution of matter partly within and partly 
 without a dosed surface T, and if M be the sum of the masses 
 which T encloses, and M' the sum of the masses outside T, the 
 surface integral over T of the normal attraction N toward the 
 interior, due to both M and M', is equal to ^irM. If V be the 
 potential function due to both M and M', ive have 
 
 (*Nds = CD H 
 
 It is easy to see that if a mass M be supposed concentrated 
 on the surface of any closed surface T whose curvature is every- 
 where finite, the surface integral of normal attraction taken 
 over Twill be 2TrM ; for all the elementary cones which can be 
 drawn from a point P in the surface so as to cut Tonce or some 
 other odd number of times lie on one side of the tangent plane 
 at the point, and intercept just half the surface of the sphere of 
 unit radius whose centre is P. 
 
 From Gauss's Theorem it follows immediately that at some 
 parts of a closed surface situated in a field of force, but en- 
 closing none of the attracting mass, the normal component of 
 the resultant attraction must act towards the interior of the 
 surface and at some parts toward the exterior, for otherwise 
 the limit of the sum of the intrinsically positive elements of the 
 surface, each one multiplied by the component in the direction 
 of the interior normal of the attraction at one of its own points, 
 could not be zero. In other words, the potential function, 
 whose rate of change measures the attraction, must at some
 
 IN THE CASE OF GRAVITATION. 53 
 
 parts of the surface increase and at others decrease in the direc- 
 tion of the interior normal. 
 
 From this it follows that the potential function cannot have a 
 maximum or a minimum value at a point in empty space ; for 
 if al such a point Q the potential function had a maximum value, 
 we could surround Q by a small closed surface, at every point 
 of which the potential function would increase in the direction 
 of the interior normal, and this would be inconsistent with the 
 fact that the surface integral of normal attraction taken over 
 the surface, which would contain no matter, must be zero. 
 Similarly it may be shown that the potential function cannot 
 have a minimum value at a point in empty space. 
 
 If the potential function be constant over a closed surface 
 which contains none of the attracting mass, it has the same 
 value throughout the interior ; for if this were not the case, 
 some point or region Q within T would have a value greater or 
 less than the surrounding region, and we could enclose Q b}* a 
 closed surface to which we could apply the course of reasoning 
 just used to show that V cannot attain a maximum value at a 
 point in empty space. 
 
 32. Tubes of Force. A line which cuts orthogonally the dif- 
 ferent members of the system of equipotential surfaces cor- 
 responding to any distribution of matter is called a ''line of 
 force," since its direction at each point of its course shows the 
 direction of the resultant force at the point. If through all 
 points of the contour of a portion of an equi potential surface 
 lines of force be drawn, these lines lie on u surface called a 
 
 FIG. 24. 
 
 "tube of force." "\Ve may easily apply Gauss's Theorem to a 
 space cut out and bounded by a portion of a tube of force and 
 two equipotential surfaces ; for the sides of the tube do not con-
 
 54 THE NEWTONIAN POTENTIAL FUNCTION 
 
 tribute anything to the surface integral of normal attraction, and 
 the resultant force is all normal at points in the equipotential 
 surfaces. If w and w' are the areas of the sections of a tube of 
 force made by two equipotential surfaces, and if F and F' are 
 the average interior forces on o> and w', we have 
 
 F<a+F'u' = [87] 
 
 if the tube encloses empty space, and 
 
 F<a+F'w'=4;irm [88] 
 
 when the tube encloses a mass m of attracting matter. 
 
 33. Spherical Distributions. In the case of a distribution 
 about a point in spherical shells, so that the density is a 
 function of the distance from this point only, the lines of force 
 are straight lines whose directions all pass through the central 
 point. Every tube of force is conical, and the areas cut out of 
 different equipotential surfaces by a given tube of force are pro- 
 portional to the square of the distance from the centre. 
 
 Consider a tube of force which intercepts an area ty from a 
 spherical surface of unit radius drawn with O as a centre, and 
 apply Gauss's Theorem to a box cut out of this tube by two 
 equipotential surfaces of radii r and (?* + Ar) respectively. 
 
 Let AOB (Fig. 25) be a section of the tube in question. 
 The area of the portion of spherical surface w which is repre- 
 sented in section at ad is r 2 ^, and the area of that at be is 
 (r-f- Ar) 2 i/f. If the average force acting on w toward the inside 
 cf the box is F, the average force acting on w' toward the inside 
 of the box will be (F-\- A r jF), and the surface integral of 
 normal attraction taken all over the outside of the box is 
 
 r + Ar) V = -/" M^' r 2 ) , [89]
 
 IN THE CASE OF GRAVITATION. 55 
 
 If the tube of force which we have been considering be ex- 
 tended far enough, it will cut all the concentric layers of matter, 
 traverse all the empty regions between the layers, if there are 
 such, and finally emerge into outside space. 
 
 If we choose r so that the box shall contain no matter, the 
 surface integral taken over the box must be zero. 
 
 In this case, 
 
 therefore, F= ^ [90] 
 
 and F= --+/*. [91] 
 
 From this it follows that in a region of empty space, either 
 included between the two members of a system of concentric 
 spherical shells of density depending only upon the distance 
 from the centre, or outside the whole system, the force of attrac- 
 tion at different points varies inversely as the squares of the 
 distances of these points from the centre. 
 
 Suppose that the box (abed) lies in a shell whose density is 
 constant ; then the surface integral of normal attraction taken 
 over the box is equal to 4^- times the matter within the box. In 
 this case the quantity of matter inside the box is 
 
 "- "- or 
 
 where e is an infinitesimal of an order higher than the first. 
 Therefore, 
 
 
 whence F=-' + ^, [92] 
 
 - 
 
 and V=--- ~ P r + /*. [93] 
 
 r o
 
 56 THE NEWTONIAN POTENTIAL FUNCTION 
 
 If the box lies in a shell whose density is inversely propor- 
 tional to the distance from the centre, we shall have 
 
 limit A r (JV?) _ _ 4 AA rg -. 
 
 Ar = Ay L. J ' L^J 
 
 whence F=Zir\ + [95] 
 
 and V=- -2irXr + /t. [96] 
 
 In general, if the box lies in a shell whose density is /(r) , we 
 shall have 
 
 r, [97] 
 
 whence F = 4 - ij f/( r ) ^ . dr. [98] 
 
 r r* / 
 
 In order to learn how to use the results just obtained to de- 
 termine the force of attraction at any point due to a given 
 spherical distribution, let us consider the simple case of a single 
 shell, of radii 4 and 5, and of density [Ar] proportional to the 
 distance from the centre. 
 
 At points within the cavity enclosed by the shell we must 
 have, according to [90] and [91], 
 
 F= and V=-+p; 
 
 r 2 r 
 
 But the force is evidently zero at the centre of the shell, where 
 r is zero, so that c must be zero everywhere within the cavitv, 
 and there is no resultant force at any point in the region. The 
 value, at the centre, of the potential function due to the shell is 
 evidently 
 
 5 [99] 
 
 = C 
 
 and it has the same value at all other points in the cavity. 
 
 In the shell itself it is easy to see that we must have at all 
 points, 
 
 F^-icXi* and V=---^+p.'. [100] 
 
 ~
 
 IX THE CASE OF GRAVITATION. 57 
 
 In order to determine the constants in this equation, we may 
 make use of the fact that F and V are everywhere continuous 
 functions of the space coordinates, so that the values of F and 
 V obtained by putting r = 4, the inner radius of the shell, in 
 [100], must be the same as those obtained by making r = 4 in 
 the expressions which give the values of F and V for the cavity 
 enclosed by the shell. This gives us 
 
 c' = 2567rX and ^' = ^2^, 
 3 
 
 so that for points within the mass of the shell we have 
 
 F= -TT\r>, [101] 
 
 r 2 
 
 and 
 
 For points without the shell we have the same general expres- 
 sions for F and V as for points within the cavity enclosed by 
 the shell, namely, 
 
 F=\ and F=-- + m, [103] 
 
 r r 
 
 but the constants are different for the two regions. 
 
 Keeping in mind the fact that F and V are continuous, it is 
 easy to see that we must get the same result at the boundary of 
 the shell, where r= 5, whether we use [103], or [101] and [102]. 
 
 This gives 
 
 k = 3G9 TT\ and m = ; 
 
 so that for all points outside the shell we have 
 
 , -IT SGOvrA. n (i-i 
 
 and V = 110-.)] 
 
 r 
 
 These last results agree with the statements made in Section 
 13, for the mass of the shell is 3GD-A. 
 
 The values, at every point in space, of the potential function 
 aud of the attraction due to any spherical distribution may be
 
 58 
 
 THE NEWTONIAN POTENTIAL FUNCTION 
 
 found by determining, first, with the aid of Gauss's Theorem, 
 the general expressions for F and V in the several regions ; 
 then the constants for the 'innermost region, remembering that 
 there is no resultant attraction at the centre of the Sj'stem ; and 
 finally, in succession (moving from within outwards), the con- 
 stants for the other regions, from a consideration of the fact 
 that no abrupt change in the values of either F or V is made by 
 crossing the common boundary of two regions. 
 
 This method of treating problems is of great practical im- 
 portance. 
 
 34. Cylindrical Distributions. In the case of a cylindrical 
 distribution about an axis, where the density is a function of 
 the distance from the axis only, the equipotential surfaces are 
 concentric cylinders of revolution ; the lines of force are straight 
 lines perpendicular to the axis ; and every tube of force is a 
 wedge. 
 
 If we apply Gauss's Theorem to a box shut in between two 
 equipotential surfaces of radii r and ? + Ar, two planes perpen- 
 dicular to the axis, and two planes passing through the axis, 
 
 " FIG. 26. 
 
 we have, if ij/ is the area of the piece cut out of the cylindrical 
 surface of unit radius by our tube of force, 
 
 to = r'if/, CD' = (r + Ar) i/r, 
 and for the surface integral of normal attraction taken over the 
 
 box, 
 
 F<o + F'<' = ilf* r (r.F). [10G] 
 
 If our box is in empty space, 
 
 so that 
 
 F= and F=clogr + /. 
 
 [107]
 
 IN THE CASE OF GRAVITATION. 
 
 If the box is within a shell of constant density p, 
 
 \jr \(r F) = 4 7n/< pr Ar, 
 so that F=Z 2irr and V= 
 
 59 
 
 [108] 
 
 35. Poisson's Equation. Let us now apply Gauss's Theorem 
 to the case where our closed surface is that of an element of 
 volume of an attracting mass in which p is either constant or a 
 continuous function of the space coordinates. We will consider 
 three cases, using first rectangular coordinates, then cylinder 
 coordinates, and finally spherical coordinates. 
 
 FIG. 27. 
 
 I. In the first case, our element is a rectangular parallelepiped 
 (Fig. 27). Perpendicular to the axis of a; are two equal sur- 
 faces of area Ay-Az, one at a distance x from the plane yz, and 
 one at a distance x + Ax from the same plane. The average 
 force perpendicular to a plane area of size A//Az, parallel to the 
 plane yz, and with edges parallel to the axes of ?/ and z, is evi- 
 dently some function of the coordinates of the corner of the 
 element nearest the origin. 
 
 That is, if P=(.r, ?/, z), the average force on PP^ parallel to 
 the axis of x is X=f(x, ?/, z), and the average force on PiP 7 in 
 the same direction is /(o; + A.T, ?/, z) = X + A x X, so that PP^ 
 and P\P- yield towards the surface integral of interior-normal 
 
 attraction taken over the element, the quantitv A.rAyAz 
 
 A.r 
 
 Similarly, the other two pairs of elementary surfaces yield
 
 60 
 
 THE NEWTONIAN POTENTIAL FUNCTION 
 
 A#AvAz 2 and 
 
 A?/ 
 
 * 
 Az 
 
 , and, if p is the average 
 
 density of the matter enclosed by the box, we have 
 
 [A X" AY" A Z~} 
 1 z 1 = 47rp n AceA?/Az. [109] 
 Ace. Ay Az J 
 
 This equation is true whatever the size of the element Ace A?/ Az. 
 If this element is made smaller and smaller, the average nor- 
 mal force [X] on PP 4 approaches in value the force [-D X F] at 
 P in the direction of the axis of x ; Y and Z approach respec- 
 tively the limits Z^Fand D X V; and p approaches as its limit 
 the actual density [p] at P. 
 
 Taking the limits of both sides of [109], after dividing by 
 AccAyAz, we have 
 
 or V'F=-47rp, [110] 
 
 which is Poisson's Equation. The potential function due to any 
 conceivable distribution of attracting matter must be such that 
 at all points within the attracting mass this equation shall be 
 satisfied. 
 
 For points in empty space p = 0, and Poisson's Equation 
 degenerates to Laplace's Equation. 
 
 II. In the case of cylindrical coordinates, the element of vol- 
 ume (Fig. 28) is bounded by two cylindrical surfaces of revo- 
 
 FIG. 28. 
 
 lution having the axis of z as their common axis and radii r and 
 r + A? 1 , two planes perpendicular to this axis and distant Ax
 
 IN THE CASE OF GRAVITATION. 
 
 61 
 
 from each other, and two planes passing through the axis and 
 forming with each other the diedral angle A0. 
 
 Call R, 0, and Z the average normal forces upon the elemen- 
 tary planes PP G , PP 2 , and PP S respectively, then the surface 
 interal of normal attraction over the volume element will be 
 
 [111] 
 
 [112] 
 
 = 47r/o (vol. of box) ; 
 whence, approximately, 
 
 r A0 
 
 vol. of box 
 
 The force at Pin direction PP 5 is D r V, in direction PP 4 is D t V, 
 and perpendicular to LP in the plane PLP^ is - D F, so that 
 if the box is made smaller and smaller, our equation approaches 
 the form ^_^ [113] 
 
 Fio. 29. 
 
 III. In the case of spherical coordinates, the volume element 
 is of the shape shown in Fig. 29. Let OP=r, ZOP=6, and
 
 62 THE NEWTONIAN POTENTIAL FUNCTION 
 
 denote by < the diedral angle between the planes ZOP and 
 ZOX. Denote by R, , and 3? the average normal forces on the 
 faces PP 6 , PP 3 , and PP 2 respectively ; then the surface integral 
 of normal attraction over the elementary box is approximately 
 
 - sin0A0A</> \(rR) r A0 Ar A^ r A< Ar . A fl (sin0 ) 
 
 = 4irp .(vol. of box) ; [114] 
 
 whence ^. M^) + _j_. A,^ + _J_. A,(sin^.@) 
 r 2 Ar r sin A< r sin A0 
 
 vol. of box [U5] 
 
 The force at P in the direction PP 5 is Z> r F, in the direction 
 
 PPi is -- D& V. and in the direction PP 4 is --D 6 V; there- 
 r sm r 
 
 fore, as the element of volume is made smaller and smaller, our 
 equation approaches the form 
 
 = -4^ r 2 sin 6. [116] 
 
 This equation, as well as that for cylinder coordinates, might 
 have been obtained by transformation from the equation in 
 rectangular coordinates. 
 
 36. Poisson's Equation in the Integral Form. In [109] X 
 may be regarded as a function of x, ?/, 2, Ay, and Az, which ap- 
 proaches Z^Fas a limit when Ay and Az are made to approach 
 zero, and it may not be evident that the limit, when Aic, Ay, and 
 
 Az are together made to approach zero, of the fraction - is 
 
 ^jhtV 
 
 D X 2 V. For this reason it is worth while to establish Poisson's 
 Equation by another method. 
 
 It is shown in Section 29 that the volume integral of the 
 
 AA 
 quantity D x ( - ), taken throughout a certain region, is the sur-
 
 IN THE CASE OF GRAVITATION. 63 
 
 face integral of ^coso. taken all over the surface which bounds 
 r 
 
 the region. In this proof we might substitute for - any other 
 
 function of the three space coordinates which throughout the 
 region is finite, continuous, and single-valued, and state the 
 results in the shape of the following theorem : 
 
 If T is any closed surface and U a function of x, y, and z 
 which for every point inside T has a finite, definite value which 
 changes continuously in moving to a neighboring point, then 
 
 ff CD I U-dxdydz= Cl T cosads, [117] 
 
 f f Cn y U- dx dydz=- Cucos fids, [11 8] 
 
 f f CDJJ- dx dijdz = - ClJcosyds, [119] 
 
 and 
 
 where a, /?, and y ai-e the angles made by the interior normals 
 at the various points of the surface with the positive direction 
 of the coordinate axes, and where the sinister integrals are to be 
 extended all through the space enclosed by T, and the dexter 
 integrals all over the bounding surface. 
 
 If we apply this theorem to an imaginary closed surface which 
 shuts in any attracting mass of density either uniform or vari- 
 able, and if for U in [ 1 1 7] , [118], and [H'J] we use respectively 
 D^V, D y V, and D,V, and add the resulting equations together, 
 we shall have 
 
 fff WF+ D;V+ D?V)<lxudz 
 
 = - f ( D z Fcos a 4- D y Vcos ft + D, Vcos 7 )ds. [ 1 20] 
 
 The integral in the second member of this equation is evi- 
 dently (see ["><>]) the surface integral of normal attraction taken 
 over our imaginary closed surface, and this by Gauss's Theorem 
 is equal to TT times the quantity of matter inside the surface, 
 so that
 
 64 THE NEWTONIAN POTENTIAL FUNCTION 
 
 f C '('(D*V+D*V+ D;V) dxdydz 
 
 = 4:* C C Cpdxdydz. [121] 
 
 Since this equation is true whatever the form of the closed 
 surface, we must have at every point 
 
 XV V+ D y 2 V+D*V=-4; TT/). 
 
 9 
 
 For if throughout any region V Fwere greater than kirp, we 
 might take the boundary of this region as our imaginary surface. 
 In this case every term in the sum whose limit gives the sinister 
 of [121] would be greater than the corresponding term in the 
 dexter, so that the equation would not be true. Similar reason- 
 ing shuts out the possibility of VF's being less than 4-irp. 
 
 37. The Average Value of the Potential Function on a Spheri- 
 cal Surface. If, in a field of force due to a mass m concentrated 
 at a point P, we imagine a spherical surface to be drawn so as 
 to exclude P, the surface integral taken over this surface of the 
 value of the potential function due to m is equal to the area of 
 the surface multiplied by the value of the potential function at 
 the centre of the sphere. 
 
 To prove this, let the radius of the sphere be a and the dis- 
 tance [OP] of P from its centre c. Take the centre of the 
 sphere for origin and the line OP for the axis of x. Divide the 
 surface of the sphere into zones by means of a series of planes 
 cutting the axis of x perpendicularly at intervals of Ax % . The 
 area of each one of these zones is 2-n-adx, so that the surface 
 
 integral of is 
 
 dx _ f" 
 -2caj 
 
 and the value of this, since the radical represents a positive 
 
 ... . 47ra 2 m , . , ... 
 
 quantity, is , which proves the proposition.
 
 IN THE CASE OF GRAVITATION. 65 
 
 The surface integral of the potential function taken over the 
 sphere divided by the area of the sphere is often called "the 
 average value of the potential function on the spherical sur- 
 face." 
 
 If we have any distribution of attracting matter, we may 
 divide it into elements, apply the theorem just proved to each 
 of these elements, and, since the potential function due to the 
 whole distribution is the sum of those due to its parts, assert 
 that: 
 
 The average value on a spherical surface of the potential 
 function due to any distribution of matter entirely outside the 
 sphere is equal to the value of the potential function at the 
 centre of the sphere. 
 
 It follows, from this theorem, that if the potential function is 
 constant within any closed surface S drawn in a region T, which 
 contains no matter, so as to shut in a part of that region, it will 
 have the same value in those parts of T which lie outside S. 
 For, if the values of the potential function at points in empty 
 space just outside S were different from the value inside, it would 
 always be possible to draw a sphere enclosing no matter whose 
 centre should be inside /5, and which outside S should include 
 only such points as were all at either higher or lower potential 
 than the space inside S ; but in this case the value of the poten- 
 tial function at the centre of the sphere would not be the average 
 of its values over its surface. 
 
 The value of the potential function cannot be constant in un- 
 limited empty space surrounding an attracting mass 37, for, if 
 it were, we could surround the mass by a surface over which the 
 surface interal of normal attraction would be zero instead of 
 
 The average value on a spherical surface of the potential 
 function [F], due to any distribution [J/"] of attracting matter 
 wholly within the surface, is the same as if M were concen- 
 trated at the centre of the space which the surface encloses. 
 For the average values [T", and T^,-|-A r T',] of T" on con- 
 centric spherical surfaces of radii r and r -f Ar may be written
 
 66 THE NEWTONIAN POTENTIAL FUNCTION 
 
 - ( Vds (or I FcZw, if d<a is the solid angle of an ele- 
 4irr 2 J 4-irJ 
 
 mentary cone with vertex at O, which intercepts the element ds 
 from the surface of a sphere of radius r), and I (F+A r F)do> ; 
 
 47T*/ 
 
 whence A r F = I A r V- do>, 
 
 4:TrJ 
 
 and D r V = 
 
 Now I D r V' a 2 do) is the integral of normal attraction taken 
 over the spherical surface, whence, by Gauss's Theorem, 
 
 ^ rr . n 
 
 and F = +0, 
 r 
 
 since V = 0, for r = oo . 
 
 38. The Equilibrium of Fluids at Rest under the Action of 
 Given Forces. Elementary principles of Hydrostatics teach us 
 that when an incompressible fluid is at rest under the action of 
 any system of applied forces, the hydrostatic pressure p at the 
 point (cc, y, z) must satisfy the differential equation 
 
 dp = P (Xdx + Ydy + Zdz}, [122] 
 
 where X, Y, and Z are the values at that point of the force 
 applied per unit of mass to urge the liquid in directions parallel 
 to the coordinate axes. 
 
 For, if we consider an element of the liquid [AaAyAz] 
 (Fig. 27) whose average density is p and whose corner next 
 the origin has the coordinates (&, y, z) , and if we denote by p x 
 the average pressure per unit surface on the face PP 2 P 4 P 3 , by 
 p x + A x p x the average pressure on the face P 1 P 5 P 7 P M and by 
 X n the average applied force per unit of mass which tends to 
 move the element in a direction parallel to the axis of x, we 
 have, since the element is at rest, 
 
 = (p x 
 A , 
 
 or 
 
 Aa;
 
 IN THE CASE OF GRAVITATION. 67 
 
 If the element be made smaller and smaller, the first side of 
 the equation approaches the limit pX, and the second side the 
 limit D;P, where p is the hydrostatic pressure, equal in all direc- 
 tions, at the point P. 
 
 This gives us D x p = P X. [1 23] 
 
 In a similar manner, we may prove that 
 
 D y p = P Y, 
 
 and D 2 p = pZ; 
 
 whence dp = D x p dx -f D^p cly + D z pdz 
 
 = p(Xdx + Ydy + Zdz} . 
 
 If in any case of a liquid at rest the only external force 
 applied to each particle is the attraction due to some outside 
 mass, or to the other particles of the liquid, or to both together, 
 X, Y, and Z are the partial derivatives with regard to x, y, and 
 2 of a single function F, and we may write our general equation 
 in the form 
 
 dp = p(D z V- dx + D y V- dy + D Z V- dz) = p. dV, 
 whence, if p is constant, 
 
 p = p V+ const., [124] 
 
 and the surfaces of equal hydrostatic pressure are also equi- 
 potential surfaces. 
 
 According to this, the free bounding surfaces of a liquid at 
 rest under the action of gravitation only are equipotential. 
 
 EXAMPLES. 
 
 1. Prove that a particle cannot be in stable equilibrium under 
 the attraction of any system of masses. [Earnshaw.] 
 
 2. Prove that if all the attracting mass lies without an equi- 
 potential surface S on which V= c, then V= c in all space 
 inside S. 
 
 3. Prove that if all the attracting mass lies within an equi- 
 potential surface S on which V=C, then in all space outside AS 
 the value of the potential function lies between C and 0.
 
 68 THE NEWTONIAN POTENTIAL FUNCTION 
 
 4. The source of the Mississippi River is nearer the centre of 
 the earth than the mouth is. What can be inferred from this 
 about the slope of level surfaces on the earth? 
 
 5. If in [59] x be made equal to zero, V becomes infinite. 
 How can you reconcile this with what is said in the first part of 
 Section 22? 
 
 6. Are all solutions of Laplace's Equation possible values of 
 the potential function in empty space due to distributions of 
 matter ? Assume some particular solution of this equation 
 which will serve as the potential function due to a possible dis- 
 tribution and show what this distribution is. 
 
 7. If the lines of force which traverse a certain region are 
 parallel, what may be inferred about the intensity of the force 
 within the region ? 
 
 8. The path of a material particle starting from rest at a 
 point P and moving under the action of the attraction of a given 
 mass Mis not in general the line of force due to M which passes 
 through P. Discuss this statement, and consider separately 
 cases where the lines of force are straight and where they are 
 curved. 
 
 9. Draw a figure corresponding to Figure 17 for the case of 
 a uniform sphere of unit radius surrounded by a concentric 
 spherical shell of radii 2 and 3 respectively. 
 
 10. Draw with the aid of compasses traces of four of the 
 equipotential surfaces due to. two homogeneous infinite cylinders 
 of equal density whose axes are parallel and at a distance of 
 5 inches apart, assuming the radius of one of the cylinders to 
 be 1 inch and that of the other to be 2 inches. 
 
 11. Draw with the aid of compasses meridian sections of 
 four of the equipotential surfaces due to two small homogeneous 
 spheres of mass m and 2m respectively, whose centres are 4 
 inches apart. Can equipotential surfaces be drawn so as to lie 
 wholly or partly within one of the spheres ? What value of the 
 potential function gives an equipotential surface shaped like 
 the fio-ure 8 ? Show that the value of the resultant force at the 
 
 O 
 
 point where this curve crosses itself is zero.
 
 EN THE CASE OF GRAVITATION. 69 
 
 12. A sphere of radius 3 inches and of constant density p. is 
 surrounded by a spherical shell concentric with it of radii 4 
 inches and 5 inches and of density fir, where r is the distance 
 from the centre. Compute the values of the attraction and of 
 the potential function at all points in space and draw curves to 
 illustrate the fact that V and D r V are everywhere continuous 
 and that Z> r 2 Fis discontinuous at certain points. 
 
 13. A very long cylinder of radius 4 inches and of constant 
 density /A is surrounded by a cylindrical shell coaxial with it 
 and of radii 6 inches and 8 inches. The density of this shell is 
 inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the 
 axis, and at a point 8 inches from this axis is p. Use the Theo- 
 rem of Gauss to find the values of F, D r V, and D r 2 V at differ- 
 ent points on a line perpendicular to the axis of the cylinder at 
 its middle point. If the value of the attraction at a distance 
 of 20 inches from the axis is 10, show how to find p. 
 
 14. Use Dirichlet's value of D X V, given by equation [78], 
 to find the attraction in the direction of the axis of x at points 
 within a spherical shell of radii r and TI and of constant den- 
 sity p. 
 
 15. Are there any other cases except those in which the 
 density of the attracting matter depends only upon the distance 
 from a plane, from an axis, or from a central point, where sur- 
 faces of equal force are also equipotential surfaces? Prove 
 your assertion. 
 
 16. Prove that if a mass MI be divided up into elements, and 
 if each one of these elements be multiplied by the value at one 
 of its own points of the potential function F 2 due to another 
 mass 3/ 2 , the limit of the sum of these infinitesimal products will 
 be equal to the limit of the sum extended over 3/ 2 of the product 
 of the masses of its elements by the corresponding values of the 
 potential function due to 3/j. That is, show that 
 
 F 2 .fLV, = 
 
 f 
 .' 
 
 where the sinister integral is to embrace all J/i and the dexter 
 all Jf 2 . [Gauss.]
 
 70 THE NEWTONIAN POTENTIAL FUNCTION 
 
 17. Two uniform straight wires of length I and of masses m^ 
 and m 2 are parallel to each other and perpendicular to the line 
 joining their middle points, which is of length y. Show that 
 the amount of work required to increase the distance between 
 the wires to y 2 by moving one of them parallel to itself is 
 
 " 72 1 ?/ VZ 2 + 2/ 2 Hog - - I ' ' [Minchin.j 
 
 y Jy=vi 
 
 18. Show that if the earth be supposed spherical and covered 
 with an ocean of small depth, and if the attraction of the par- 
 ticles of water on each other be neglected, the ellipticity of the 
 ocean spheroid will be given by the equation, 
 
 _ The centrifugal force at the equator 
 9 
 
 19. A spherical shell whose inner radius is r contains a mass 
 m of gas which obeys the Law of Boyle and Mariotte. Find 
 the law of density of the gas, the total normal pressure on the 
 inside of the containing vessel, and the pressure at the centre. 
 
 20. If the earth were melted into a sphere of homogeneous 
 liquid, what would be the pressure at the centre in tons per 
 square foot ? If this molten sphere instead of being homo- 
 geneous had a surface density of 2.4 and an average density of 
 5.6, what would be the pressure at the centre on the supposition 
 that the density increased proportionately to the depth? 
 
 21. A solid sphere of attracting matter of mass m and of 
 radius r is surrounded by a given mass M of gas which obeys 
 the Law of Boyle and Mariotte. If the whole is removed from 
 the attraction of all other matter, find the law of density of the 
 gas and the pressure on the outside of the sphere. 
 
 22. The potential function within a closed surface S due to 
 matter wholly outside the surface has for extreme values the 
 extreme values upon S. 
 
 23. If the potential functions V and V due to two systems 
 of matter without a closed surface have the same values at all 
 points on the surface, they will be equal throughout the space 
 enclosed by the surface.
 
 IN THE CASE OF GRAVITATION. 71 
 
 24. The potential function outside of a closed surface due to 
 matter wholly within the surface has for its extreme values two 
 of the following three quantities : zero and the extreme values 
 upon the surface. 
 
 25. Prove that if R is the distance from the origin of coordi- 
 nates to the point P, and if V P is the value at P of the potential 
 function of any system of attracting masses within a finite dis- 
 tance of the origin, the limit as R is made infinite of V P -P is 
 equal to M, the whole quantity of attracting matter.
 
 72 THE POTENTIAL FUNCTION 
 
 CHAPTER III. 
 
 THE POTENTIAL FUNCTION IN THE CASE OP 
 KEPULSION. 
 
 39. Repulsion, according to the Law of Nature. Certain 
 physical phenomena teach us that bodies ma}' acquire, by 
 electrification or otherwise, the property of repelling each other, 
 and that the resulting force of repulsion between two bodies is 
 often much greater than the force of attraction which, ac- 
 cording to the Law of Gravitation, every body has for every 
 other body. 
 
 Experiment shows that almost every such case of repulsion, 
 however it may be explained physically, can be quantitatively 
 accounted for by assuming the existence of some distribution of 
 a kind of" matter," every particle of which is supposed to repel 
 every other particle of the same sort according to the " Law of 
 Nature," that is, roughly stated, with a force directly propor- 
 tional to the product of the quantities of matter in the particles, 
 and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between 
 their centres. 
 
 In this chapter we shall assume, for the sake of argument, 
 that such matter exists, and proceed to discuss the effects of 
 different distributions of it. Since the law of repulsion which 
 we have assumed is, with the exception of the opposite direc- 
 tions of the forces, mathematically identical with the law which 
 governs the attraction of gravitation between particles of pon- 
 derable matter, we shall find that, b}~ the occasional intro- 
 duction of a change of sign, all the formulas which we have 
 proved to be true for cases of attraction due to gravitation 
 can be made useful in treating corresponding problems in 
 repulsion.
 
 IN THE CASE OF REPULSION. 
 
 73 
 
 40. Force at Any Point due to a Given Distribution of 
 Repelling Matter. Two equal quantities of repelling matter 
 concentrated at points at the unit distance apart are called 
 " unit quantities" when they are such as to make the force of 
 repulsion between them the unit force. 
 
 If the ratio of the quantity of repelling matter within a small 
 closed surface supposed drawn about a point P, to the volume 
 of the space enclosed by the surface, approaches the limit p when 
 the surface (always enclosing P) is supposed to be made smaller 
 and smaller, p is called the "density" of the repelling matter 
 at P. 
 
 In order to find the magnitude at any point P of the force due 
 to any given distribution of repelling matter, we may suppose 
 the space occupied by this matter to be divided up into small 
 elements, and compute an approximate value of this force on the 
 assumption that each element repels a unit quantity of matter 
 concentrated at P with a force equal to the quantity of matter 
 in the element divided by the square of the distance between P 
 and one of the points of the element. The limit approached by 
 this approximate value as the size of the elements is diminished 
 indefinitely is the value required. 
 
 FIG. 30. 
 
 Let Q (Fig. 30), whose coordinates are x', ?/, z', be the 
 corner next the origin of an element of the distribution. Let'p 
 be the density at Q and Ax-'A^/'Az' the volume of the element; 
 then the force at P due to the matter in the element is approxi-
 
 74 THE POTENTIAL FUNCTION 
 
 f) ^VT* &.1I A 2i 
 mately equivalent to a force of magnitude " acting in 
 
 ftf 
 
 the direction QP, or a force of magnitude ^ _ acting 
 
 Ptf 
 
 in the direction PQ. If the coordinates of P are cc, y, 2, the 
 component of this force in the direction of the positive axis of x 
 
 p Ace' Aw' Az' (#' x) 
 
 18 FT-i - V* , / , va . / f xv 1a and the f orce at P parallel 
 [('-z) 2 + (y'- y) 2 + (' ) a ]i 
 
 to the axis of a; due to the whole distribution of repelling 
 matter is 
 
 '''' -, 
 
 where the triple integration is to be extended over the whole 
 space filled with the repelling matter. For the components of 
 the force at P parallel to the other axes we have, similarly, 
 
 Y= - C C C p(y'-y)dx'dy'dz' r 
 
 J J J i (x >- x y+ (y <-yy +(z <- z yy 
 
 and 
 
 7= CCC p(z'-z)dx'dy'dz' r .-, 
 
 <>< 
 
 If we denote by V the function 
 
 pdx'dy'dz' 
 
 which, together with its first derivatives, is everywhere finite 
 and continuous, as we have shown in the last chapter, it is easy 
 to see that 
 
 X=-D.V, Y=-D y V, Z = -D M V, [127] 
 
 Y, [128] 
 
 and that the direction-cosines of the line of action of the re- 
 sultant force at P are 
 
 -'-' and -
 
 IN THE CASE OF REPULSION. 75 
 
 It follows from this (see Section 21) that the component in 
 any direction of the force at a point P due to any distribution 
 M of repelling matter is minus the value at P of the partial 
 derivative of the function V taken in that direction. 
 
 The function Fgoes by the name of the Newtonian potential 
 function whether we are dealing with attracting or repelling 
 matter. 
 
 In the case of repelling matter, it is evident that the resultant 
 force on a particle of the matter at any point tends to drive that 
 particle in a direction which leads to points at which the poten- 
 tial function has a lower value, whereas in the case of gravita- 
 tion a particle of ponderable matter at any point tends to move 
 in a direction along which the potential function increases. 
 
 41. The Potential Function as a Measure of Work. It is 
 
 easy to show by a method like that of Article 27 that the 
 amount of work required to move a unit quantity of repelling 
 matter, concentrated at a point, from P l to P 2 , m face of the 
 force due to any distribution J/ of the same kind of matter, is 
 V 2 FI, where V l and F 2 are the values at P l and P., respec- 
 tively of the potential function due to M. The farther P l is 
 from the given distribution, the smaller is Fi, and the less does 
 F 2 F! differ from F 2 . In fact, the value of the potential 
 function at the point P 2 , wherever it may be, measures the work 
 which would be required to move the unit quantity of matter by 
 any path from " infinity" to P 2 . 
 
 42. Gauss's Theorem in the Case of Repelling Matter. If a 
 quantity m of repelling matter is concentrated at a point within 
 a closed oval surface, the resultant force due to m at any point 
 on the surface acts toward the outside of the surface instead of 
 towards the inside, as in the case of attracting matter. 
 
 Keeping this in mind, we may repeat the reasoning of Article 
 31, using repelling matter instead of attracting matter, and sub- 
 stituting all through the work the exterior normal for the in- 
 terior normal, and in this way prove that :
 
 76 THE POTENTIAL FUNCTION 
 
 If there be any distribution of repelling matter partly within 
 and partly without a closed surface T, and if M be the whole 
 quantity of this matter enclosed by T, and M' the quantity out- 
 side T, the surface integral over T of the component in the di- 
 rection of the exterior normal of the force due to both M and M' 
 is equal to 4 irM. If V be the potential function due to M and 
 Jf', we have 
 
 43. Poisson's Equation in the Case of Repelling Matter. If 
 we apply the theorem of the last article to the surface of a 
 volume element cut out of space containing repelling matter, 
 and use the notation of Article 35, we shall find that in the case 
 of rectangular coordinates the surface integral, taken over the 
 element, of the component in the direction of the exterior 
 normal is 
 
 [130] 
 A?/ Az 
 
 where X is the average component in the positive direction of 
 the axis of x of the force on the elementary surface AyAz, and 
 where Y and Z have similar meanings. It is evident that if 
 the element be made smaller and smaller, X, Y", and Z will 
 approach as limits the components parallel to the coordinate 
 axes of the force at P. These components are D X V, D y V, 
 and D,V; so that if we divide [130] by AxAyAz and then 
 decrease indefinitely the dimensions of the element, we shall 
 arrive at the equation 
 
 V 2 F=-47r/>. [131] 
 
 By using successively cylinder coordinates and spherical co- 
 ordinates we may prove the equations 
 
 [132] 
 and 
 
 sin 
 
 sin 0, [133]
 
 IN THE CASE OF REPULSION. 77 
 
 so that Poisson's Equation holds whether we are dealing with 
 attracting or repelling matter. 
 
 44. Coexistence of Two Kinds of Active Matter. Certain 
 physical phenomena may be most conveniently treated mathe- 
 matically by assuming the coexistence of two kinds of "matter" 
 such that any quantity of either kind repels all other matter of 
 the same kind according to the Law of Nature, and attracts all 
 matter of the other kind according to the same law. 
 
 Two quantities of such matter may be considered equal if, 
 when placed in the same position in a field of force, they are 
 subjected to resultant forces which are equal in intensity and 
 which have the same line of action. The two quantities of 
 matter are of the same kind if the direction of the resultant 
 forces is the same in the two cases, but of different kinds if the 
 directions are opposed. The unit quantity of matter is that 
 quantity which concentrated at a point would repel with the 
 unit force an equal quantity of the same kind concentrated at 
 a point at the unit distance from the first point. 
 
 It is evident from Articles 2, 14, and 40 that m units of one 
 of these kinds of matter, if concentrated at a point (a, ?/, z) and 
 exposed to the action of m^ ? 2 , m 3 , ... m k units of the same 
 kind of matter concentrated respectively at the points (x^ 1/1, zj, 
 (a? z , ?/ 2 , z 2 ), (* 3 , y 3 , z a ), ... (* t , y t , z*), and of m i+1 , w t+2 , ... m n 
 units of the other kind of matter concentrated respectively at 
 the points (x k+l , y t+1 , z* + i), (**-j-2 2/*+2' * + *)> (#n V^ O 
 will be urged in the direction parallel to the positive axis of x 
 with the force 
 
 * + mV^i^, [134] 
 
 where r t is the distance between the points (*, y, z) and 
 (a:,., ?/,., z,.) . 
 If we agree to distinguish the two kinds of matter from each 
 
 o ^ 
 
 other by calling one kind " positive " and the other kind " neg- 
 ative," it is easy to see that if every m which belongs to positive
 
 78 THE POTENTIAL FUNCTION 
 
 matter be given the plus sign and every m which belongs to 
 negative matter the minus sign, we may write the last equation 
 in the form 
 
 X=-', 
 
 The result obtained by making m in [135] equal to unity is 
 called the force at the point (#, y, z). 
 
 In general, m units of either kind of matter concentrated at 
 the point (#, y, z) , and exposed to the action of any continuous 
 distribution of matter, will be urged in the positive direction of 
 the axis of x by the force 
 
 n*ri 
 
 ; [136] 
 
 in this expression, p. the density at (V, ?/', z') , is to be taken 
 positive or negative according as the matter at the point is 
 positive or negative : m is to have the sign belonging to the 
 matter at the point (x, y, z) : and the limits of integration are to 
 be chosen so as to include all the matter which acts on m. 
 
 With the same understanding about the signs of m and of p, 
 it is clear that the force which urges in any direction s, m units 
 of matter concentrated at the point (#,?/, z) is equal to in -D 8 V, 
 where Fis the everywhere finite, continuous, and single-valued 
 function 
 
 r f r p (x 1 - *) dx' dy' dz' 
 
 J J J [(x'-x 
 
 and that mV measures the amount of work required to bring up 
 from " infinity" by any path to its present position the m units 
 of matter now at the point (#, y, z) . 
 
 If we call the resultant force which would act on a unit of 
 positive matter concentrated at the point P "the force at P," 
 it is clear that if any closed surface T be drawn in a field of 
 force due to any distribution of positive and negative matter so 
 as to include a quantity of this matter algebraically equal to Q,
 
 IN THE CASE OF REPULSION. 79 
 
 the surface integral taken over T of the component in the direc- 
 tion of the exterior normal of the force at the different points of 
 the surface is equal to 4?rQ. 
 
 It will be found, indeed, that all the equations and theorems 
 given earlier in this chapter for the case of one kind of repelling 
 matter may be used unchanged for the case where positive and 
 negative matter coexist, if we only give to p and m their proper 
 signs. 
 
 It is to be noticed that Poisson's Equation is applicable 
 whether we are dealing with attracting matter or repelling mat- 
 ter, or positive and negative matter existing together. 
 
 EXAMPLES. 
 
 1. Show that the extreme values of the potential function 
 outside a closed surface S, due to a quantity of matter algebrai- 
 cally equal to zero within the surface, are its extreme values 
 on S. 
 
 2. Show that if the potential function due to a quantity of 
 matter algebraically equal to zero and shut in by a closed sur- 
 face S has a constant value all over the surface, then this con- 
 stant value must be zero.
 
 80 
 
 SUKFACE DISTRIBUTIONS. 
 
 CHAPTER IV. 
 
 SUEPACE DISTRIBUTIONS. -GEEEFS THEOEEM. 
 
 45. Force due to a Closed Shell of Repelling Matter. If a 
 quantity of very finely-divided repelling matter be enclosed in a 
 box of any shape made of indifferent material, it is evident 
 from [127] and from the principles of Section 38 that if the vol- 
 ume of the box is greater than the space occupied by the repel- 
 ling matter, the latter will arrange itself so that its free surface 
 will be equipotential with regard to all the active matter in 
 existence, taking into account any there may be outside the box 
 as well as that inside. It is easy to see, moreover, that we 
 shall have a shell of matter lining the box and enclosing an 
 empty space in the middle. 
 
 That any such distribution as that indicated in the subjoined 
 diagram is impossible follows immediately from the reasoning 
 of Section 37. For ABC and DEF are parts of the same 
 
 equipotential free surface of the matter. If we complete this 
 surface by the parts indicated by the dotted lines, we shall 
 enclose a space void of matter and having therefore throughout 
 a value of the potential function equal to that on the bounding
 
 GREEN'S THEOREM. 81 
 
 surface. But in this case all points which can be reached from 
 by paths which do not cut the repelling matter must be at the 
 same potential as 0, and this evidently includes all space not 
 actually occupied by the repelling matter ; which is absurd. 
 
 Let us consider, then (see Fig. 32), a closed shell of repelling 
 matter whose inner surface is equipotential, so that at every 
 point of the cavity which the shell shuts in, the resultant force, 
 due to the matter of which the shell is composed and to am- 
 outside matter there may be, is zero. 
 
 Let us take a small portion w of the bounding surface of the 
 cavity as the base of a tube of- force which shall intercept an 
 
 FIG. 32. 
 
 area Von an equipotential surface which cuts it just outside the 
 outer surface of the shell, and let us apply Gauss's Theorem to 
 the box enclosed by w, o>', and the tube of force. If F' is the 
 average value of the resultant force on <o', the only part of the 
 surface of the box which yields anything to the surface integral 
 of normal force, we have 
 
 F'a>' = 4 TT??I, 
 
 where m is the quantity of matter within the box. If we multi- 
 ply and divide by o>, this equation may be written 
 
 jp" = i^.^. [137] 
 
 If <o be made smaller and smaller, so as always to include a 
 given point A, w' as it approaches zero will always include a 
 point B on the line of force drawn through A, and F' will ap- 
 proach the value F of the resultant force at B. 
 
 The shell may be regarded as a thick layer spread upon the
 
 82 SURFACE DISTRIBUTIONS. 
 
 inner surface, and in this case the limit of may be consid- 
 
 w 
 
 ered the value at A of the rate at which the matter is spread 
 upon the surface. If we denote this limit by <r, we shall have 
 
 If B be taken just outside the shell, and if the latter be very 
 thin, ^Q ("-7) evidently differs little from unity; and we see 
 
 that the resultant force at a point just outside the outer sur- 
 face of a shell of matter, whose inner surface is equipotential, 
 becomes more and more nearly equal to 4?r times the quantity 
 of matter per unit of surface in the distribution at that point as 
 the shell becomes thinner and thinner. 
 
 The reader may find out for himself, if he pleases, whether or 
 not the line of action of the resultant force at a point just out- 
 side such a shell as we have been considering is normal to the 
 shell. 
 
 It is to be carefully noticed that the inner surface of a closed 
 shell need not be equipotential unless the matter composing the 
 shell is finely divided and free to arrange itself at will. 
 
 When the shell is thin, and we regard it as formed of matter 
 spread upon its inner surface, a- is called the "surface density" 
 of the distribution, and its value at any point of the inner sur- 
 face of the shell may be regarded as a measure of the amount of 
 matter which must be spread upon a unit of surface if it is to 
 be uniformly covered with a layer of thickness equal to that of 
 the shell at the point in question. 
 
 46. Surface Distributions. It often becomes necessary in the 
 mathematical treatment of physical problems, on the assump- 
 tion of the existence of a kind of repelling matter or agent, to 
 imagine a finite quantity of this agent condensed on a surface 
 in a layer so thin that for practical purposes we may leave the 
 thickness out of account. If a shell like that considered in the 
 last section could be made thinner and thinner by compression
 
 GREEN S THEOREM. 
 
 83 
 
 while the quantity of matter in it remained unchanged, the 
 volume density (/o) of the shell would grow larger and larger 
 without limit, and tr would remain finite. A distribution like 
 this, which is considered to have no thickness, is called a sur- 
 face distribution. 
 
 The value at a point P of the potential function due to 
 a superficial distribution of surface densit}* a- is the surface 
 
 integral, taken over the distribution, of -, where r is the dis- 
 
 r 
 tance from P. 
 
 It is evident that as long as P does not lie exactly in the 
 distribution, the potential function and its derivatives are always 
 finite and continuous, and the force at any point in any direc- 
 tion may be found by differentiating the potential function 
 partially with regard to that direction. 
 
 If p were infinite, the reasoning of Article 22 would no 
 longer apply to points actually in the active matter, and it is 
 worth our while to prove that in the case of a surface distri- 
 bution where a- is everywhere finite, the value at a point P of 
 the potential function due to the distribution remains finite, as 
 
 P is made to move normally through the surface at a point of 
 finite curvature. 
 
 To show this, take the point (Fig. 33), where P is to cut 
 the surface, as origin, and the normal to the surface at as
 
 84 SUKFACE DISTRIBUTIONS. 
 
 the axis of x, so that the other coordinate axes shall lie in 
 the tangent plane. 
 
 If the curvature in the neighborhood of is finite, it will be 
 possible to draw on the surface about a closed line such that 
 for every point of the surface within this line the normal will 
 make an acute angle with the axis of x. 
 
 For convenience we will draw the closed line of such a shape 
 that its projection on the tangent plane shall be a circle whose 
 centre is at and whose radius is V, and we will cut the area 
 shut in by this line into elements of such shape that their pro- 
 jections upon the tangent plane shall divide the circle just 
 mentioned into elements bounded by concentric circumferences 
 drawn at radial intervals of Aw, and by radii drawn at angular 
 distances of A^>. 
 
 .If a;, 0, are the coordinates of the point P, #', y', z' those 
 of a point of one of the elements of the area shut in by the 
 closed line, and a the angle which the normal to the surface 
 at this point makes with the axis of x, the size of the surface 
 
 element is approximately - , where w 2 = 2 /2 -f ?/' 2 , and the 
 
 cosa 
 
 value at P of the potential function due to that part of the sur- 
 face distribution shut in by the closed line is 
 
 The quantity 
 
 (ru a- sec a 
 
 cos a -v(x x') 2 + u? 
 
 u J 
 
 is always finite, for, whatever the value of the quantit\- under 
 the radical sign in the last expression may be when a;, a;', and u 
 are all zero, it cannot be less than unity, and therefore Vi must 
 be finite even when P moves down the axis of x to the surface 
 itself. 
 
 If V and V 2 are the values at P of the potential functions 
 due respectively to all the existing acting matter and to that
 
 GREEN'S THEOREM. 8-3 
 
 part of this matter not lying on the portion of the surface shut 
 in by our closed line, we have F= Vi + V 2 , and, since P is a 
 point outside the matter which gives rise to F 2 , the latter is 
 finite ; so that V is finite. 
 
 The reader who wishes to study the properties of the deriva- 
 tives of the potential function, and their relations to the force 
 components at points actually in a surface distribution, will find 
 the whole subject treated in the first part of Riemanu's Schwere, 
 Electricitiit and Magnetismus. 
 
 Using the notation of this section, it is easy to write down 
 definite integrals which represent the values of the potential 
 function at two points ou the same normal, one on one side of 
 a superficial distribution, and at a distance a from it, and the 
 other on the other side at a like distance, and to show that the 
 difference between these integrals may be made as small as we 
 like by choosing a small enough. This shows that the value of 
 the potential function at a point P changes continuously, as P 
 moves normally through a surface distribution of finite super- 
 ficial density. If matter could be concentrated upon a geo- 
 metric line, so that there should be a finite quantity of matter 
 on the unit of length of the line, or if a finite quantity of matter 
 could be really concentrated at a point, the resulting potential 
 function would be infinite on the line itself, and at the point. 
 
 47. The Normal Force at Any Point of a Surface Distribu- 
 tion. In the case of a strictly superficial distribution on a 
 closed surface where the repelling matter is free to arrange 
 itself at will, the inner surface of the matter (and hence the 
 outer surface, which is coincident with it) is equipotential, and 
 the resultant force at a point B just outside the distribution is 
 normal to the surface and numerically equal to 4 ^ times the 
 surface density at B. This shows that the derivative of tho 
 potential function in the direction of the normal to the surface 
 has values on opposite sides of the surface differing by 4 -a-, 
 and at the surface itself cannot be said to have any definite 
 value.
 
 86 SURFACE DISTRIBUTIONS. 
 
 It is easy, however, to find the force with which the repelling 
 matter composing a superficial distribution is urged outwards. 
 For, take a small element to of the surface as the base of a tube 
 of force, and apply Gauss's Theorem to a box shut in by the 
 surface of distribution, the tube of force, and a portion to' of 
 an equipotential surface drawn just outside the distribution. 
 Let F and F' be the average forces at the points of <a and to' 
 respectively, then the surface integral of normal forces taken 
 over the box is F'u'Fu, and this, since the only active 
 matter is concentrated on the surface of the box (see Section 
 31), is equal to 27ro- w, where <r is the average surface density 
 at the points of the element to. This gives us 
 
 Now let the equipotential surface of which to' is a part be 
 drawn nearer and nearer the distribution ; then 
 
 lirn =1, lim -F" = 47rtr , and F= 
 
 F is the average force which would tend to move a unit quan- 
 tity of repelling matter concentrated successively at the differ- 
 ent points of w in the direction of the exterior normal, but the 
 actual distribution on to is wtr , so that this matter presses on 
 the medium which prevents it from escaping with the force 
 27r<r 2 to; and, in general, the pressure exerted on the resisting 
 medium which surrounds a surface distribution of repelling 
 matter is at any point 2^0^ per unit of surface, where a- is the 
 surface density of the distribution at the point in question. 
 
 We may imagine a superficial distribution of matter which is 
 fixed, instead of being free to arrange itself at will. In this 
 case the surface of the matter will not be in general equipoten- 
 tial, but, if we apply Gauss's Theorem to a box shut in by a 
 slender tube of force traversing the distribution, and by two 
 surfaces drawn parallel to the distribution and close to it, one 
 on one side and one on the other, we may prove that the
 
 GREEN'S THEOREM. 
 
 87 
 
 normal component of the force at a point just outside the dis- 
 tribution differs by 4 TTOT from the normal component, in the same 
 sense, of the force at a point just inside the distribution on the 
 line of force which passes through the first point. 
 
 48. Green's Theorem. Before proving a very general theorem 
 due to Green,* of which what we have called Gauss's Theorem 
 is a special case, we will show that if T is any closed surface 
 and U a function of x, ?/, and z, which for every point inside T 
 is finite, continuous, and single-valued, 
 
 f f fa, U- dx dy dz = Cu- D n x . cZs, 
 
 [140] 
 
 where the first integral is to include all the space shut in by T 7 , 
 and the second is to be taken over the whole surface, and where 
 D n x represents the partial derivative of a; taken in the direction 
 of the exterior normal. 
 
 To prove this, choose the coordinate axes so that T shall lie 
 in the first octant, and divide the space inside the contour of the 
 
 Fio. 34. 
 
 projection of T on the plane yz into elements of size fb/dz. On 
 each of these elements erect a right prism cutting T twice or 
 some other even number of times. Let us call the values of U 
 at the successive points where the edge nearest the axis of .T of 
 
 * George Green, An E*sa>/ on the Application of Mnthf mntiral Analysis to 
 lite Theories of Elect ricitj and Maynetism. Nottingham, 1828.
 
 88 SURFACE DISTRIBUTIONS. 
 
 any one of these prisms cuts T, t/i, U^ U 3 , ... U 2n respectivel} 1 ; 
 the angles which this edge makes with exterior normals drawn 
 to T at these points, a l5 03, a 3 , ... cu n Vand the elements which 
 the prism cuts from the surface T, ds^ ds. 2 , ds s , ...ds 2n . It is 
 evident that wherever a line perpendicular to the plane yz cuts 
 into T, the corresponding value of a is obtuse and its cosine 
 negative, but wherever such a line cuts out of T, the correspond- 
 ing value of a is acute and its cosine positive. 
 
 Keeping this in mind, we shall see that although the base of 
 a prism is the common projection of all the elements which it 
 cuts from T, and in absolute value is approximately equal to 
 an} T one of these multiplied by the corresponding value of cos a, 
 yet, since dxdy, ds^ ds 2 , etc., are all positive areas and some of 
 the cosines are negative, we must write, if we take account of signs, 
 
 If the indicated integration with regard to x in the left-hand 
 member of [140] be performed and the proper limits introduced, 
 we shall have 
 
 / /+ 
 
 U. A +L\ -],[141] 
 
 where the double sign of integration directs us to form a quan- 
 tity corresponding to that in brackets for every prism which 
 cuts T, to multiply this bj- the area of the base of the prism, 
 and to find the limit of the sum of all the results as the bases of 
 the prisms are made smaller and smaller. 
 
 Since we may substitute for dydz any one of its approxi- 
 mate values given above, we may write the quantity within 
 the brackets 
 
 U\ cos ai dSi + U 2 cos a. 2 ds 2 + U 3 cos a 3 ds s + , 
 
 and this shows that the double integral is equivalent to the sur- 
 face integral, taken over the whole of T, of 7 cos a, whence we 
 may write 
 
 CCCD x U'dxdydz=Cucosads, [Hi]
 
 GREEN'S THEOREM. 89 
 
 where the first integral is to be taken all through the space shut 
 in by T, and the second over the whole surface. 
 
 Let P(x, y, z) be anj point of T, a, /?, and y the angles 
 which the exterior normal drawn to ? at T> makes with the 
 coordinate axes, and P' a point on this normal at a distance 
 An from P. The coordinates of P' are 
 
 x 4- An cos a, y -\- An cos/?, z 4- An cos y, 
 
 and if W=f(x, y, z) be any continuous function of the space 
 coordinates, 
 
 IF" f(f 11 y\ 
 " p J \- K i Ui z ) ? 
 
 W P ' =f(x-\- An cos a, ?/ + An cos/?, z 4- An cosy) 
 
 =/(#, y, z) + An cos a D z f+ An cos/? D y f 
 and 4-AncosyZ) z /+(An) 2 Q, 
 
 ~\V W * 
 
 , p = cos a A/4- cos /? A/+ cos 7 ' -D./+ AH Q, 
 
 whence 
 
 1 i m = D n Wp = cos a D x f+ cos ft D y f-\- cos y D 2 f. [143] 
 
 If, as a special case, W= x, we have Z> n x=cosa; so that 
 [142] may be written 
 
 fffPxU- dxdydz = CuD n 'x da, [144] 
 
 which we were to prove.* 
 
 Green's Theorem, which follows very easily from this result. 
 may be stated iu the following form : 
 
 If U and V are any two functions of the space coordinates 
 which together with their first derivatives with respect to these 
 coordinates are finite, continuous, and single-valued throughout 
 the space shut iu by any closed surface T, then, if n refers to 
 an exterior normal, 
 
 * This theorem has been virtually proved already in Sections 29 and .'JO.
 
 90 SURFACE DISTRIBUTIONS. 
 
 = Cu- D n V- ds - C C Cu- V 2 F- dxdydz [145] 
 
 = Cv-D n U-ds- C C Cv-V 2 U-dxdydz, [146] 
 
 where the triple integrals include all the space within T and the 
 single integrals include the whole surface. 
 
 Since D X U- D X V=D X (U- D X V)-U-D X 2 V, 
 we have J I I D x U'D X V- dx dydz 
 
 = C CCD X (U' D x V)dxdydz- C C Cu-D x 2 V- dxdydz; 
 but, from [144], 
 
 CC CD x (U-D x V)dxdydz= Cu-D x V> D n x-ds, 
 
 whence C C C(D X U-D X V) dxdydz 
 
 = Cu- D x V-D n x-ds- CCCU'D*V-dxdydz. [147] 
 
 If we form the two corresponding equations for the deriva- 
 tives with regard to ?/ and z, and add the three together, we shall 
 obtain an expression which, by the use of [143], reduces im- 
 mediately to [145], Considerations of symmetry give [146]. 
 
 If we subtract [146] from [145], we get 
 
 f ff ( U- V 2 V- V- V 2 U) dxdydz 
 
 [148] 
 
 In applying Green's Theorem to such spaces as those marked 
 T in the adjoining diagrams, it is to be noticed that the walls 
 of the cavities, marked S' and S", as well as the surfaces,
 
 GREEN S THEOREM. 
 
 91 
 
 marked S, form parts of the boundaries of the spaces, and that 
 the surface integrals, which the theorem declares must be taken 
 
 FIG. 35. 
 
 over the whole boundaries of the spaces, are to be extended 
 over S' and S" as well as over S. We must remember, how- 
 ever, that an exterior normal to T at S' points into the cavity C'. 
 
 49. Special Cases under Green's Theorem. I. If in [148] 
 V be the potential function due to any distribution either of 
 repelling matter or of positive and negative matter existing 
 together, whether this matter is within or without T 7 , and if 
 U= 1, we have 
 
 and 47T CCC P dxdydz= f[-D M F]<7s. [149] 
 
 The triple integral on the left-hand side of the equation is the 
 whole amount of matter (algebraically considered, where we have 
 both positive and negative matter) within 7\ and the dexter is 
 the surface integral taken over T of the force in the direc- 
 tion of the exterior normal; so that [14D] expresses Gauss's 
 Theorem. 
 
 II. If in [145] we make U equal to F, and let this represent 
 as before the potential function due to any distribution of actual 
 matter within or without 7\ we shall have 
 
 |" C Cffdxdydz = fv- D n Yds + 4* f ffp Vdxdydz, [150] 
 where 11 is the resultant force at the point (x, y, z) .
 
 92 SURFACE DISTRIBUTIONS. 
 
 III. If in [145] we make U= V= u, any function which 
 within the closed surface T satisfies the equation V 2 w = 0, we 
 shall have 
 
 C C (\(D x u}-+(D y uY+(D,uy-\dxdydz = fu-D n u.ds.[\5\-\ 
 
 IV. If in [148] Fis the potential function due to two distri- 
 butions of active matter, M { inside the closed surface T and M 3 
 
 outside it, and if U= - where r is the distance of the point 
 
 (#, ?/, z) from a fixed point 0, we must consider separately the 
 two cases where is respectively without T and within T. 
 
 A. If is without T 7 , V 2 f - ] =0 for points within the sur- 
 
 w 
 
 face. Also, V V= 47iy>, so that 
 
 ds - JV- D n () ds = - 
 
 FIG. 36. 
 
 The triple integral is evidently equal to the value at the point 
 of the potential function due to M 1 alone. If we call this Fi, 
 siud notice (see [143]) that D n r at any point of T is the cosine 
 of the angle 8 between r and the exterior normal to J 7 , we have 
 
 D n V , FcosS , 
 
 
 If 7 1 is a surface eqnipotential with respect to the joint action 
 of 3/j and J/2, and if we denote by V, the constant value of V 
 on T 7 , we have 
 
 ""cos 8 , 
 ds =
 
 GREEN'S THEOREM. 93 
 
 and it is easy to show, by the reasoning used in Section 31, 
 
 that j - ds = 0, whence 
 
 J r 
 
 V l = --LC*>sZd8. [153] 
 
 B. If is a point inside 7 1 , whether or not it is within M^ 
 and -if T is equipotential with respect to the action of M l and 
 J/ 2 , we will surround by a small spherical surface s' of 
 radius r', and apply [148] to the space lying inside T and with- 
 out the spherical surface. In doing so, it is to be noticed that 
 s' forms part of the boundary of the region we are dealing with, 
 and that an exterior normal to the region at s' will be an interior 
 normal of the sphere. 
 
 FIG. 37. 
 
 we have 
 
 2/l\ 
 
 Since for all points of the region we are considering V [ - 1 = 0. 
 
 W 
 
 ave 
 
 f^T*- C* M _ r./WlW f r D ,,(Tw 
 
 J r J r 1 J \rj J \r' J 
 
 = _47r C C C^dxdydz; [154] 
 
 or, since ds' = r' 2 d<a' , where dot' is the area which the elementary 
 cone whose base is ds' and vertex intercepts on the sphere 
 of unit radius drawn about 0, 
 
 Uds + V.f c -^ds - r' fa V- do,'- 
 
 [155]
 
 94 SURFACE DISTRIBUTIONS. 
 
 . It is easily proved, by the reasoning of Section 31, that 
 'cosS , 
 
 J' 
 
 
 and it is clear that if r' be made smaller and smaller, the third 
 integral of [155] approaches the limit zero. If V' is the average 
 value of Fon the surface s', 
 
 J V'd w = 
 
 and as r' is made smaller and smaller, this approaches the value 
 47rF , where V is the value of Fat 0. The value, when r 1 is 
 zero, of the triple integral in [155] is evidently FI, and we 
 have 
 
 f*^ds + 47rF,-47rF = -47rF 1 . [156] 
 
 If F 2 is the value at of the potential function due to M, 2 
 alone, V = Fi + F 2 , so that [156] may be written in the form 
 
 V s - F 2 = - -- -ds. [157] 
 
 4W r 
 
 If T is not equipotential with respect to the action of M\ and 
 3f 2 , we have 
 
 4 TT F, = C-^ds - C VD n (-} ds. [158] 
 
 J r c/ \ry 
 
 V. If in [148] we make U=-, where r is the distance of 
 
 the point (x,y,z) from a fixed point 0, and if F=v, a function 
 which within the closed surface T satisfies the equation Vv = 0, 
 we shall have 
 
 4 TTV = f vZ> B (T\ ds - f^ ds, [159] 
 
 J \rj J r 
 
 if is within T, and 
 
 f^ds= CvD H (}d8, [160] 
 
 J r J \rj 
 
 if is outside T.
 
 GREEN'S THEOREM. 95 
 
 50. Th? Surface Distributions Equivalent to Certain Volume 
 Distributions. Keeping the notation of IV. in the last article, 
 let T be a closed surface equipotential with respect either to 
 the joint action of two distributions of matter, M l inside T and 
 J/2 outside it, or (when M 2 equals zero) to the action of a 
 single distribution within the surface ; and let Fj, F" 2 , and V 
 be the values of the potential functions due respectively to M l 
 alone, to M 2 alone, and to 3/i and M. 2 existing together. If a 
 quantity of matter were condensed on T so as to give at every 
 
 D V 
 point a surface density equal to - , the whole quantity of 
 
 4?r 
 matter on the surface would be 
 
 and this, by [149], is equal in amount to J/i. Let us study the 
 effect of removing MI from the inside of T and spreading it in 
 a superficial distribution J/,' over 2\ so that the surface density 
 
 D V 
 
 ut every point shall be In what follows, it is assumed 
 
 4 TT 
 
 that we have two distributions of matter, one inside the closed 
 surface and the other outside. It is to be carefully noted, how- 
 ever, that by putting 3L equal to zero in our equations, all our 
 results are applicable to the case where we have an equipotential 
 surface surrounding all the matter, which may be all of one kind 
 or not. 
 
 The value, at any point 0, of the potential function due to 
 the joint effect of J/ 2 and the surface distribution J//, would be 
 
 4 ir 
 
 If is an outside point, we have, by [153], 
 F = F 2 + F 1 , 
 
 so that the effect at any point outside an equipotentinl surface 
 of a quantity J/, of matter anyhow distributed inside the Mir- 
 face is the same as that of an equal quantity of matter dis- 
 tributed over the surface in such a way that the superficial
 
 96 SURFACE DISTRIBUTIONS. 
 
 density at ever}- point is "- , where V is the value of the 
 
 4 - 
 
 potential function due to the joint action of M l and any matter 
 (M 2 ) that may be outside the surface. 
 If is an inside point, we have, by [157], 
 
 F =F 2 + F,-F 2 = F., [161] 
 
 which shows that the joint effect of M 2 and M is to give to all 
 points within and upon the surface the same constant value of 
 the potential function which points upon the surface had before 
 M t was displaced by MJ. If, therefore, Jf/ and M 2 exist without 
 .Mi, there is no force at any point of the cavity shut in by T; 
 or, in other words, the force due to M alone is at all points 
 inside T equal and opposite to that due to M 2 . 
 
 If M! and M 2 exist without J/i', the cavity enclosed by T is, in 
 general, a field of force. MI acts as a screen to shield the space 
 within T from the action of M 2 . 
 
 The surface of MI is equipotential with respect to all the 
 active matter, so that there is no tendency of the matter com- 
 posing the surface distribution to arrange itself in any different 
 manner upon T. 
 
 51. The potential function F, due to any distribution of 
 matter whose volume density p is everywhere finite, satisfies the 
 following conditions : 
 
 (1 ) F and its first space derivatives are everywhere finite and 
 continuous, and are equal to zero at an infinite distance from 
 the attracting mass. 
 
 (2) If R is the distance from the origin of coordinates to the 
 
 point P, 
 
 limit / T7 - -n\ -it- 
 
 R = ( F P'- R ) = - af ' 
 
 where M is a definite constant. 
 
 (3) Except at the surface of the attracting mass, or at some 
 other surface where p is discontinuous, . 
 
 V 2 F=-47rp, 
 where p is to be put equal to zero outside of the attracting mass.
 
 GREEN'S THEOREM. 97 
 
 It is easy to show from Green's Theorem that for a given 
 value of p as a function of x, y, and z, only one function which 
 will satisfy these three conditions exists. 
 
 Suppose, for the sake of argument, that there are two such 
 functions, Faiid F', and put u = V V. It is evident that u 
 satisfies conditions (1) and (2), and that V~(M) = except where 
 p is discontinuous. Parallel to each surface of discontinuity, 
 and very near to it, draw two surfaces, one on each side, so as 
 to shut in the places where Vu is not zero, and draw a spherical 
 surface about the origin, using a radius R large enough to 
 
 O ' ~ O ~ 
 
 enclose all the surfaces of discontinuity. 
 
 If now we apply [151] to that part of the space inside the 
 spherical surface and not shut in by the barriers which we have 
 drawn, and if we notice that each pair of parallel barriers to- 
 gether yields nothing to the surface integral, we shall have 
 
 f f f[(A) 2 + (D, uY + (>^) 2 ] dxdydz = Cu -D n u- ds, 
 
 where the dexter integral is to be extended over the spherical 
 surface only. 
 
 If dw is the solid angle of the infinitesimal cone which inter- 
 cepts the element ds from the spherical surface, we have 
 
 I uD n uds = R 2 f uD R ud<a. 
 
 Now since u satisfies condition (2) above, it is easy to show 
 that if we make R grow larger and larger, this surface integral 
 approaches the value zero as a limit, for u approaches the value 
 
 - and D R u the value ^-, so that the whole integral ap- 
 
 -/I /t 
 
 proaches the value' , which, when R i.s made infinite, 
 Jv 
 
 approaches the value zero. 
 
 If we embrace all space in our sphere, we shall have 
 
 . ) 2 ] dxdydz = 0, 
 whence D t u = 0, D f ? = 0, D,u = 0.
 
 98 SURFACE DISTRIBUTIONS. 
 
 Therefore u is constant in all space, and since it is zero at 
 infinity, must be everywhere zero, so that V= V. 
 
 52. Thomson's Theorem or Dirichlet's Principle. We will now 
 prove a theorem* which is usually called Dirichlet's Principle 
 by Continental writers, but which in English books is generally 
 attributed to Sir W. Thomson. This theorem, in its simplest 
 form, asserts that there always exists one, but no other than 
 this one, function, v, of x, y, z, which (1) is finite, continuous, and 
 single-valued, together with its first space derivatives, through- 
 out a given closed region L ; (2) at every point of the region 
 satisfies the equation V 2 v = 0; and (3) at every point on the 
 boundary of the region has any arbitrarily assigned value, pro- 
 vided that this can be regarded as the value at that point of a 
 single- valued function which has derivatives finite, continuous, 
 and single-valued all over this boundary. 
 
 There is evidently an infinite number of functions which 
 satisfy the first and third conditions. If, for instance, the equa- 
 tion of the bounding surface S of the region is F(x, ?/, z) = 0, 
 and if the value of v at the point (#, y, z) upon this surface is to 
 be /(#, y, z} , any function of the form 
 
 *(, y, z) -F(x, y, z} +/(, y, z) 
 
 would satisfy the third condition, whatever finite function $ 
 might be. 
 
 If we assign to the function to be found a constant value C 
 all over S, v ^C will satisfy all three of the conditions given 
 above. 
 
 * Green, An Essay on the Application of Mathematical Analysis to the 
 Theories of Electricity and 'Magnetism. Gauss, Allgemeine Lehrsdtze in Bezie- 
 httny an f die im verkehrten Verhaltnissc des Quadrats der Entfernung wirkenden 
 Anziehunrjs- und Abstossunyskrafte. Thomson, Reprint of Papers on Electro- 
 statics and Magnetism. Pirichlet, Vbrlesungen iiber die im umgekehrten Ver- 
 hdltniss des Quadrats der Entfernnncj wirkenden Krafte. Also, Thomson and 
 Tail's Natural l^n'/oso/ihi/, and several papers by Dirichlet in Crelle's Jour- 
 nal and in the Comptes Rendus.
 
 GREEN'S THEOREM. 99 
 
 If the sought function is to have different values at different 
 points of /S, and if for u in the integral 
 
 Q = (D*uy + (VyuY + (D,w) 2 ] dxdydz, 
 
 which is to be extended over the whole of the region, we substi- 
 tute any one of all the functions which satisfy conditions (1) 
 and (3), the resulting value of Q will be positive. Some one at 
 least of these functions (i>) must, however, yield a value of Q 
 which though positive, is so small that no other one can make Q 
 smaller. Let h be an arbitrary constant to which some value 
 has been assigned, and let iv be any function which satisfies 
 condition (1) and is equal to zero at all parts of $, then 
 U=v-+-hw will satisfy conditions (1) and (3), and conversely, 
 there is no function which satisfies these two conditions which 
 cannot be written in the form U= v -\- hw, where h is an arbi- 
 trary constant, and iv a function which is zero at S and which 
 satisfies condition (1). 
 
 Call the minimum value of Q due to v, Q c , and the value of Q 
 due to U, Qv, then 
 
 ( C C( 
 
 (D x v D z w +D y v-D y w + D,v - D f ic) dxdydz 
 
 + h? [( D * w Y + ( D v w Y + ( A') 2 ] dxdydz, 
 
 which, since iv is zero at the boundary of the region, may be 
 written, by the help of Green's Theorem, 
 
 Q v - Q t = -2/t C C Cw 
 
 Now since Q v is the minimum value of Q, no one of the infi- 
 nite number of values of Q U Q, formed by changing h and w 
 under the conditions just named can be negative ; but if V s u 
 were not everywhere equal to zero within Z/. it would be easy 
 to choose v: so that the coefficient of '2h in the expression 
 for Qu Q v should not be zero, and then to choose h so that 
 Qv Q should be negative. Hence V 2 v is equal to zero through-
 
 100 SURFACE DISTRIBUTIONS. 
 
 out L, and there always exists at least one function which satis- 
 fies the three conditions stated above. 
 
 There is only one such function ; for if beside v there were 
 another u = v + hw, we should have, since the coefficient of h is 
 zero when V 2 (w) = 0, 
 
 and, that Q u may be as small as Q v , JiQ must be zero, whence 
 either h = or O = 0, and if O = 0, w is zero. Therefore, 
 u = v, and there is only one function which in any given case 
 satisfies all the three conditions given above. 
 
 By applying the same reasoning to the space outside a closed 
 surface S and inside a spherical surface of large radius R which 
 is finally made infinite, it is easy to prove that there always exists 
 in the space outside a closed surfaced one and only one function 
 v which (1) has a given value at every point of $, (2) satisfies 
 the equation V 2/ y = 0, (3) together with its first derivatives, is 
 finite and continuous outside $, and (4) is such that the limit, 
 as R becomes infinite, of Rv is a definite, finite constant. 
 
 These theorems help us to prove other theorems, of which two 
 are of considerable interest for us. 
 
 I. If a function v=f(x,y,z), together with its first space 
 derivatives, is finite and continuous in all space outside a sur- 
 face $, and outside this surface satisfies the equation V 2 t> = 0, 
 
 and if v\ r x? + y 2 + z 2 approaches a definite, finite, constant 
 limit as .the point (x, y, z) moves away from the origin to in- 
 finity, then this function may be considered to be the potential 
 function of a surface distribution of matter upon S. 
 
 In order to prove this, we will first apply [160] to v', the 
 function which has on S the same value as v, which inside S is, 
 with its first derivatives, finite and continuous, and which satisfies 
 the equation V 2 v'= ; and use the space inside S as our region. 
 This gives 
 
 f 
 
 J 
 
 where n refers to the exterior normal of S.
 
 GREEN'S THEOREM. 101 
 
 If we now apply [159] to the function v, using as a field the 
 space outside S and within a spherical surface S 1 of large radius 
 M, drawn about the point as centre, we shall have 
 
 s- (T^ f?s + _L fvds' + JL CD a v 
 J r R-J RJ 
 
 where n is made to refer to the same normal as before bv a 
 change of sign in the first two integrals. If now we combine 
 the two equations just obtained, and make R infinite, so that tbe 
 last two integrals of the second equation shall vanish, we shall 
 have 
 
 VO = + -T f(AX-A^) , 
 
 <7rJ r 
 
 which is the value at an outside point of the potential function due 
 to a superficial distribution of surface density (D n v' D n v) 
 
 4ir 
 
 spread upon S. 
 
 It is to be noticed that the letter r refers to a point without 
 S in each of the last three equations. Instead of one closed 
 surface we might have several, as it is eas}- to prove by intro- 
 ducing as many Dirichlet's functions as there are surfaces. 
 
 We will state the second theorem, leaving the proof, wh/ch is 
 almost identical in form with the one just given, for the reader. 
 
 II. If a function v' = F(x,y,z} satisfies the equation V 2 f'= 
 throughout the space enclosed by a closed surface , and within 
 this space, together with its first derivatives, is everywhere 
 finite and continuous, it may be considered to be the potential 
 function within this space of a surface distribution on S. 
 
 The superficial density of this distribution will be found to be 
 
 J-(D n t,'-A,v), 
 
 where v is the function which has the same value on S that ? 
 has, and outside S satisfies the equation v~('-') = an< -l tnc other 
 conditions given above. 
 
 It follows, from these theorems, that we may assign any con- 
 tinuously arranged arbitrary values to the potential function at
 
 102 SURFACE DISTRIBUTIONS. 
 
 the different points of a closed surface , make these values the 
 common values on the surface of the functions v and v', and 
 assert that a distribution of matter on S of surface density 
 
 o- = (D n v' D n v) would give rise to a potential function 
 
 4?r 
 
 having the chosen values on S. In this case v and v' would be 
 the values in regions respectively without and within S of the 
 potential function due to this surface distribution. It is, then, 
 always possible to distribute matter in one and only one way 
 upon a given closed surface so that the value of the potential 
 function due to the matter shall have given values all over the 
 surface. 
 
 EXAMPLES. 
 
 1. Prove that there always exists one, but no other than this 
 one, function, v, which, together with its first space derivatives, 
 is finite, continuous, and single-valued everywhere within a given 
 region L, has values at the boundary of the region equal to 
 those of an arbitrarily chosen, finite, continuous, and single- 
 valued function, f(x, y, 2), and satisfies at every point in L the 
 equation 
 
 D X (K- D x v) + D y (K- D tj v} + D,(K> D z v^ = 0, 
 
 where K is a function positive within L. 
 
 2. If the potential function due to a certain distribution of 
 matter is given equal to zero for all space external to a given 
 closed surface S and equal to <(#, ?/, z), where < is a continu- 
 ous single-valued function zero at all points of S, for all space 
 within S ; there is no matter without $, there is a superficial dis- 
 tribution of surface densit 
 
 upon S, and the volume density of the matter within S is 
 
 A?*]. 
 
 [Thomson and Tait.]
 
 ELECTROSTATICS. 103 
 
 CHAPTER V. 
 
 ELEOTEOSTATIOS. 
 
 53. Introductory. Having considered abstractly a few of 
 the characteristic properties of what has been called "the New- 
 tonian potential function," we will devote this chapter to a very 
 brief discussion of some general principles of Electrostatics. 
 By so doing we shall incidentally learn how to apply to the treat- 
 ment of practical problems many of the theorems that we have 
 proved in the preceding chapters. 
 
 In what follows, the reader is supposed to be familiar with 
 such electrostatic phenomena as are described in the first few 
 chapters of treatises on Statical Electricity, and with the hypoth- 
 eses that arc given to explain these phenomena. 
 
 Without expressing any opinion with regard to the physical 
 nature of what is cnlled electrification, we shall here take for 
 granted that whether it is due to the presence of some sub- 
 stance, or is only the consequence of a mode of motion or of a 
 state of polarization, we may, without error in our results, use 
 some of the language of the old "Two Fluid Theory of Elec- 
 tricity " as the basis of our mathematical work. 
 
 The reader is reminded that, among other things, this theory 
 teaches that : 
 
 (1) Every particle of a body which is in its natural state con- 
 tains, combined together so as to cancel each other's effects at 
 all outside points, equal large quantities of two kinds of elec- 
 tricity with properties like those of the positive and negative 
 " matter" described in Section 44. 
 
 (2) Electrification consists in destroying in some way the 
 equality between the amounts of the two kinds of electricity 
 which a body, or some part of a body, naturally contains, so 
 that there shall be an excess or charye of one kind. If the
 
 104 ELECTROSTATICS. 
 
 charge is of positive electricity, the body is said to be posi- 
 tively electrified ; if the charge is negative, negatively electrified. 
 Either kind of electricity existing uncombined with an equal 
 quantity of the other kind, is called free electricity. 
 
 (3) When a charged body A is brought into the neighborhood 
 of another body B in its natural state, the two kinds of elec- 
 tricity in every particle of B tend to separate from each other, 
 one being attracted and the other repelled by A's charge, and 
 to move in opposite directions. 
 
 In general, a tendency to separation occurs in all parts of the 
 body, whether it is charged or not, where the resultant electric 
 force (the force due to all the free electricity in existence) is 
 not zero. This effect is said to be due to induction. 
 
 In our work we shall assume all this to be true, and proceed 
 to apply the principles stated in Section 44 to the treatment of 
 problems involving distributions of electricity. We shall find it 
 convenient to distinguish between conductors, which offer prac- 
 tically no resistance to the passage of electricity through their 
 substance, and nonconductors, which we shall regard as prevent- 
 ing altogether such transfer of electricity from part to part. 
 
 54. The Charges on Conductors are Superficial. When elec- 
 tricity is communicated to a conductor, a state of equilibrium is 
 soon established. After this has taken place, there can be no 
 resultant force tending to move any portion of the charge 
 through the substance of the conductor, for, by supposition, the 
 conductor does not prevent the passage of electricity through 
 itself. 
 
 Moreover, the resultant electric force must be zero at all 
 points in the substance of a conductor in electric equilibrium ; 
 for if the force were not zero at an_y point, electricity would 
 be produced by induction at, that point, and carried away 
 through the body of the conductor under the action of the 
 inducing force. 
 
 From this it follows that the potential function V, due to all 
 the free electricity in existence, must be constant throughout
 
 ELECTROSTATICS. 105 
 
 the substance of any single conductor in electric equilibrium, 
 whether or not the conductor be charged, and whether or not 
 there be other charged or uncharged conductors in the neigh- 
 borhood. Different conductors existing together will in general 
 be at different potentials, but all the points of any one of these 
 conductors will be at the same potential. 
 
 Wherever V is constant, y~I"=0, and hence, by Poisson's 
 Equation, p = 0, so that there can be no free electricity within 
 the substance of a conductor in equilibrium, and the whole 
 charge must be distributed upon the surface. Experiment 
 shows that we must regard the thickness of charges spread upon 
 conductors as inappreciable, and that it is best to consider that 
 in such cases we have to do with really superficial distributions 
 of electricity, in which the conductor bears a rough analogy to 
 the cavity enclosed by the thin shells of repelling matter de- 
 scribed in the preceding chapter. 
 
 The surface density at any point of a superficial distribution 
 of electricity shall be taken positive or negative, according as 
 the electricity at that point is positive or negative, and the force 
 which would act upon a unit of positive electricity if it were 
 concentrated at a point P without disturbing existing distribu- 
 tions shall be called "the electric force" or "the strength of 
 the electric field at P." 
 
 It is evident, from Sections 45 and 4G, that the electric force 
 at a point just outside a charged conductor, at a place where 
 the surface density of the charge is <r, is 47ro-, and that this is 
 directed outwards or inwards, according as o- is positive or nega- 
 tive. 
 
 In other words, D n V, the derivative of the potential function 
 in the direction of the exterior normal, is equal to 4 Tnr. and 
 the value of Fat a point P just outside the conductor is greater 
 or less than its value within the conductor, according as the 
 surface density of the conductor's charge in the neighborhood of 
 P is negative or positive. 
 
 It is to be carefully noted that, although the surface of a con- 
 ductor must always be equipoteutial, the superficial density of
 
 106 ELECTROSTATICS. 
 
 the conductor's charge need not be the same at all parts of the 
 surface. We shall soon meet with cases where the electricity 
 on a conductor's surface is at some points positive and at others 
 negative, and with other cases where the sign of the potential 
 function inside and on a conductor is of opposite sign to the 
 charge. 
 
 It is evident, from the work of Section 47, that the resistance 
 per unit of area which the nonconducting medium about a con- 
 ductor has to exert upon the conductor's charge to prevent it 
 from flying off, is, at a part where the density is cr, 27rcr. 
 
 55. General Principles which follow directly from the Theory 
 of the Newtonian Potential Function. If two different distribu- 
 tions of electricit}-, which have the same system of equipoten- 
 tial surfaces throughout a certain region, be superposed so as to 
 exist together, the new distribution will have the same equipo- 
 tential surfaces in that region as each of the components. For, 
 if YI and V 2 , the potential functions due to the two components 
 respectively, be both constant over any surface, their sum will 
 be constant over the same surface. 
 
 Two distributions of electricity, which have densities every- 
 where equal in magnitude but opposite in sign, have the same 
 system of equipoteutial surfaces, and, if superposed, have no 
 effect at any point in space. 
 
 Two distributions of electricity, arranged successively on the 
 same conductor so that at every point the density of the one 
 is m times that of the other, have the same system of equipo- 
 tential surfaces, and the potential function due to the first is 
 everywhere m times as great as that due to the second. 
 
 If the whole charge of a conductor which is not exposed to 
 the action of any electricity except its own is zero, the super- 
 ficial density must be zero at all points of the surface, and the 
 conductor is in its natural state. For if cr is not everywhere 
 zero, it must be in some places positive and in others negative ; 
 and, according to the work of the last section, the potential 
 function F, due to this charge, must have, somewhere outside
 
 ELECTROSTATICS. 107 
 
 the conductor, values higher and lower than F , its value in the 
 conductor itself. But this would necessitate somewhere in empty 
 space a value of the potential function not lying between T'J) and 
 0, the value at infinity ; that is, a maximum in empty space if 
 T^ is positive, and a minimum if T^, is negative ; which is 
 absurd. 
 
 A system of conductors, on each of which the charge is null, 
 must be in the natural state if exposed to the action of no out- 
 side electricity. For, by applying the reasoning just used to 
 that conductor in which the potential function is supposed to 
 have the value most widely different from zero, we may show 
 that the surface density all over the conductor is zero, so that 
 no influence is exercised on outside bodies ; and then, suppos- 
 ing this conductor removed, we may proceed in the same way 
 with the system made up of the remaining conductors. 
 
 If a charge J/ of electricit}-, when given to a conductor, ar- 
 ranges itself in equilibrium so as to give the surface density 
 
 <r =/(*', y. 2) and to make the potential function V I ' r 
 
 ' r 
 
 constant within the conductor, ;) charge J/", if arranged on the 
 conductor so as to give at every point the density rr= f(x, >/,z) 
 would be in equilibrium, for it would give everywhere the poten- 
 tial function ( I * = T , and this is constant wherever T', 
 
 J r 
 is constant. 
 
 Only one distribution of the same quantity of electricity J/on 
 the same conductor, removed from the influence of all other 
 electricity, is possible ; for, suppose two different values of sur- 
 face density possible, cr 1 =j\(x, y, z) and <r 2 =f->(x*y,z), then 
 o- 2 = f->(x*y*z) is a possible distribution of the charge ^F. 
 Superpose the distribution o- 2 upon the distribution o-, so that 
 the total charge shall be equal to zero ; then the surface density 
 at every point is rr l o- 2 , and this must be zero by what we have 
 just proved, so that o- : = <r.,. 
 
 Since we may superpose on the same conductor a number of 
 distributions, each one of which is by itself in equilibrium, it is
 
 108 ELECTROSTATICS. 
 
 easy to see that if the whole quantity of electricity on any con- 
 ductor be changed in a given ratio, the density at each point 
 will be changed in the same ratio. 
 
 56. Tubes of Force and their Properties. We have seen that 
 a unit of positive electricity concentrated at a point P just out- 
 side a conductor would be urged away from the conductor or 
 drawn towards it, according as that point on the conductor which 
 is nearest P is positively or negatively electrified. If we regard 
 lines of force drawn in an electric field as generated by points 
 moving from places of higher potential to places of lower poten- 
 tial, we may say that a line of force proceeds from every point 
 of a conductor where the surface density is positive, and that a 
 line of force ends at every point of a conductor where the sur- 
 face density is negative. No line of force either leaves or 
 enters a conductor at a point where the surface densit}' is zero, 
 and no line of force can start at one point of a conductor where 
 the electrification is positive and return to the same conductor 
 at a point where the electrification is negative. No line of force 
 can proceed from one conductor at a point electrified in any way 
 and enter another conductor at a point where the electrification 
 Las the same name as at the starting-point. A line of force 
 never cuts through a conductor so as to come out at the other 
 side, for the force at every point inside a conductor is zero. 
 
 Lines and tubes of force are sometimes called in electrostatics 
 lines and tubes of " induction." 
 
 When a tube of force joins two conductors, the charges Q 15 
 Q 2 of the portions S^ S 2 which it cuts from the two surfaces are 
 
 FIG. 38. 
 
 made up of equal quantities of opposite kinds of electricity. 
 For if we suppose the tube of force to be arbitrarily prolonged
 
 ELECTROSTATICS. 109 
 
 and closed at the ends inside the two conductors, the surface 
 integral of normal force taken over the box thus formed is zero, 
 for the part outside the conductors yields nothing, since the re- 
 sultant force is tangential to it, and there is no resultant force 
 at any point inside a conductor. It follows, from Gauss's 
 Theorem, that the whole quantity of electricity (Qi-f-Q L .) inside 
 the box must be zero, or Q, = Q 2 , which proves the theorem. 
 If <TI and o- 2 are the average values of the surface densities of 
 the charges on Si and S-, respectively, we have ' 1 >S' 1 = Q 1 and 
 0-282 = Q%, whence 
 
 <r s = -<rif- [162] 
 
 A 2 
 
 The integral taken over any surface, closed or not, of the 
 force normal to that surface is called by some writers the flow 
 of force across the surface in question, and by others the induc- 
 tion through this surface. 
 
 If we apply Gauss's Theorem to a box shut in by a tube 
 of force and the portions ,, S' 2 which it cuts from any two 
 equipotential surfaces, we shall have, if the box contains no 
 electricity, 
 
 F 2 S z -Fi>Si=Q, [163] 
 
 where FI and F 2 are the average values, over Si and S respec- 
 tively, of the normal force taken in the same direction (that in 
 which V decreases) in both cases. In other words, the flow of 
 force across all equipotential sections of a tube of force con- 
 taining no electricity is the same, or the average force over an 
 equipotential section of an empty tube of force is inversely pro- 
 portional to the area of the section. 
 
 When a tube of force encounters a quantity m of electricity 
 (Fig. 39), the flow of force through the tube on passing this
 
 110 ELECTROSTATICS. 
 
 electricity is increased by 4-jrm. If, however, the tube encoun- 
 ters a conductor large enough to close its end completely, a 
 charge m will be found on the conductor just sufficient to reduce 
 to zero the flow of force (/) through the tube. That is, 
 
 m = - 
 
 47T 
 
 It is sometimes convenient to consider an electric field to be 
 divided up by a system of tubes of force, so chosen that the flow 
 of force across any equipotential surface of each tube shall be 
 equal to 4?r. Such tubes are called unit tubes; for wherever 
 one of them abuts on a conductor, there is always the unit quan- 
 tity of electricity on that portion of the conductor's surface which 
 the tube intercepts. In some treatises on electricity the term 
 " line of force" is used to represent a unit tube of force, as 
 when a conductor is said to cut a certain number of " lines of 
 force." 
 
 It is evident that m unit tubes abut on a surface just outside 
 a conductor charged with m units of either kind of electricity, 
 if the superficial density of the charge has everywhere the same 
 sign. These tubes must be regarded as beginning at the con- 
 ductor if m is positive, and as ending there if m is negative. 
 If a conductor is charged at some places with positive elec- 
 tricity and at others with negative electricity, tubes of force 
 will begin where the electrification is positive, and others will 
 end where the electrification is negative. 
 
 It is evident that no tube of force can return into itself. 
 
 FIG. 40. 
 
 57. Hollow Conductors. When the nonconducting cavity, 
 shut in by a hollow conductor K (Fig. 40), contains quantities
 
 ELECTROSTATICS. Ill 
 
 of electricity (ra^ w 2 , m 3 , etc., or ^ ?n) distributed in any way, 
 
 but insulated from A", there is induced on the walls of the cavity 
 a charge of electricity algebraically equal in quantity, but oppo- 
 site in sign, to the algebraic sum of the electricity within the 
 cavity. 
 
 Call the outside surface of the conductor S and its charge 
 3/ , the boundary of the cavity , and its charge 37,., and sur- 
 round the cavity by a closed surface <S, every point of which lies 
 within the substance of the conductor, where the resultant force 
 is zero. Now the surface integral of normal force taken over 
 S is zero, so that, according to Gauss's Theorem, the algebraic 
 sum of the quantities of electricity within the cavity and upon 
 $ { is zero. That is, 
 
 j/ ; + Wl + ms + Ml3 -f .. . = 3fi + V (m) = 0, [1 G4] 
 
 and this is our theorem, which is true whatever the charge on 
 S is, and whatever distribution of free electricity there may 
 be outside K. If the distribution of the electricity within the 
 cavity be changed by moving m 1? m.>, etc., to different positions, 
 the distribution of J/j-on S ( will in general be changed, although 
 its value" remains unchanged. 
 
 If K has received no electricity from without, its total charge 
 must be zero ; that is, 
 
 If a charge algebraically equal to M be given to A", 
 3f o = J/_J/.. 
 
 The combined effect of ^ (m ), the electricity within the cavity, 
 
 and MI, the electricity on the walls of the cavity, is at all points 
 without Si absolutely null. For, if we apply [!">'>] to S, any sur- 
 face drawn in the conductor so as to enclose .\. we shall have />,.!' 
 everywhere zero, since the potential function is constant within 
 the conductor; this shows that 1'j, the potential function due to
 
 112 ELECTllOSTATICS. 
 
 all the electricity within , must be zero at all points without S ; 
 but S may be drawn as nearly coincident with S { as we please. 
 Hence our theorem, which shows that, so far as the value of the 
 potential function in the substance of the conductor or outside 
 it, and so far as the arrangement of M and of M ', any free 
 
 electricity there may be outside K, are concerned, M ( and N (m) 
 
 might be removed together without changing anything. The 
 potential function at all points outside S t is to be found by con- 
 sidering only M and M' . 
 
 If Si happens to be one of the equipotential surfaces of ^ (m) 
 
 considered by itself, M i will be arranged in the same way as a 
 charge of the same magnitude would arrange itself on a con- 
 ductor whose outside surface was of the shape $ if removed 
 from the action of all other free electricity. 
 
 The potential function ( F 2 ) due to M and M' is constant 
 everywhere within S ; for if we apply [157] to a surface , 
 drawn within the substance of the conductor as near S as we 
 
 like, we shall have 
 
 F S -F = 0, 
 
 whicli proves the theorem. 
 
 The potential function within the cavity is equal to F" 2 + Fi, 
 where Vi is the potential function due to M t and ^ (w) Of these, 
 
 F" 2 is, as we have seen, constant throughout K and the cavity 
 (Section 31) which it encloses, while V\ has different values in 
 different parts of the cavity, and is zero within the substance of 
 the conductor. 
 
 Suppose now that, by means of an electrical machine, some 
 of the two kinds of electricity existing combined together in a 
 conductor within the cavity be separated, and equal quantities 
 (g) of each kind be set free and distributed in any manner 
 within the cavity. 
 
 The value of Fi within the cavity will probably be different 
 from what it was before, but F" 2 will be unchanged ; for the
 
 ELECTROSTATICS. 113 
 
 quantity of matter in the cavity is unchanged, being now, alge- 
 braically considered, 
 
 so that M t is unchanged, although it may have been differently 
 arranged on <, in order to keep the value of Fi zero within 
 the substance of the conductor. If now a part of the free 
 electricity in the cavity be conveyed to S t in some way, the sub- 
 stance of the conductor will still remain at the same potential as 
 before. For, if I units of positive electricity and n units of 
 negative electricity be thus transferred to S { , the whole quantity 
 
 of free electricity within the cavity will be N (m) l + n, and 
 
 that on S { will be M { -\-l-n: but these are numerically equal, 
 but opposite in sign, and the charge on S t , if properly arranged, 
 suffices, without drawing on M to reduce to zero the value of 
 Fi in K. Since M and M' remain as before, Y 2 is unchanged, 
 and the conductor is at the same potential as before. So long 
 as no electricity is introduced into the cavity from without K, 
 no electrical charges within the cavity can have any effect out- 
 side S^ 
 
 Most experiments in electricity are carried on in rooms, which 
 we can regard as hollows in a large conductor, the earth. Fg, 
 the value of the potential function in the earth and the walls of 
 the room, is not changed by anything that goes on inside the 
 room, where the potential function is V V l + V 2 . Since we 
 are generally concerned, not with the absolute value of the poten- 
 tial function, but only with its variations within the room, and 
 since Fo remains always constant, it is often convenient to dis- 
 regard F, altogether, and to call 1\ the value of the potential 
 function inside the room. When we do this we must remember 
 that we are taking the value of the potential function in the 
 earth as an arbitrary zero, and that the value of I", at a point in 
 the room really measures only the difference between the values 
 of the potential function in the earth and at the point in ques- 
 tion. When a conductor A in the room is connected with the
 
 114 ELECTROSTATICS. 
 
 walls of the room by a wire, the value of V\ in A is, of course, 
 zero, and A is said to have been put to earth. 
 
 58. Induced Charge on a Conductor which is put to Earth. 
 
 Suppose that there are in a room a number of conductors, viz. : 
 AI charged with M 1 units of electricity, and A 2 , A 3 , A, etc., 
 connected with the walls of the room, and therefore at the po- 
 tential of the earth, which we will take for our zero. If the 
 potential function has the value p l inside A^ every point in the 
 room outside the conductors must have a value of the potential 
 function lying between pj and 0, else the potential function must 
 have a maximum or a minimum in empty space. If 2h is posi- 
 tive, there can be no positive electricity on the other conductors ; 
 for if there were, lines of force must start from these conductors 
 and go to places of lower potential ; but there are no such places, 
 since these conductors are at potential zero, and all other points 
 of the room at positive potentials. In a similar way we may 
 prove that if 2h is negative, the electricity induced on the other 
 conductors is wholly positive. 
 
 Now let us apply [158] to a spherical surface, drawn so as 
 to include A l and at least one of the other conductors, but with 
 radius a so small that some parts of the surface shall lie within 
 the room. If we take the point at the centre of this surface, 
 we shall have 
 
 47rF 2 = - fD r V-ds + ~ Cvds. [165] 
 
 aJ o?J 
 
 If M is the whole quantity of electricity within the spherical 
 surface, there must be a quantity M outside the surface, either 
 on the walls of the room or on conductors within the room. 
 The value at of the potential function, V 2 , due to the elec- 
 
 M 
 
 tricity without the sphere, is less in absolute value than , 
 
 for it could only be as great as this if all the electricity outside 
 the sphere were brought up to its surface. 
 By Gauss's Theorem,
 
 ELECTROSTATICS. 115 
 
 therefore, f Fds = 47ra[Jtf +aF 2 ]. [166] 
 
 Now, if MI is positive, the integral is positive, for all parts of 
 the spherical surface within the room yield positive differentials, 
 and all other parts zero, so that the second side of the equation 
 is positive. But a V. 2 is of opposite sign to M, and is less in 
 absolute value ; hence, M is positive, and the total amount of 
 negative electricity induced on the other conductors within the 
 spherical surface by the charge on A^ is numerically less than 
 this charge, unless some one of these conductors surrounds A s ; 
 in which case the induced charge comes wholly on this conduc- 
 tor, while the other conductors, and the walls of the room, are 
 free. Some of the tubes of force which begin at A l end on the 
 walls of the room, provided these latter can be reached from 
 AI without passing through the substance of any conductor. 
 
 59. Coefficients of Induction and Capacity. If a number of 
 insulated conductors, A^ A M A^ etc., ai - e in a room in the pres- 
 ence of a conductor A l charged with J/j units of electricity, the 
 whole charge on each is zero ; but equal amounts of positive and 
 negative electricity are so arranged by induction on each, that 
 the potential function is constant- throughout the substance of 
 every one of the conductors. 
 
 Let the values of the potential functions in the system of con- 
 ductors be PJ, 2hi Pzi P\i etc- Since each conductor except A\ is 
 electrified, if at all, in some places with positive electricity, and 
 in others with negative electricity, some lines of force nni-4 
 start from, and others end at, every such electrified conductor. 
 so that there must be points in the air about each conductor at 
 lower and at higher potentials than the conductor itself. But 
 the value of the potential function in the walls of the room is 
 zero, and there can be no points of maximum or minimum poten- 
 tial in empty space ; so that PI must be that value of the poten- 
 tial function in the room most widely different from zero, and 
 Pzi PAI P^ e tc-, must have the same sign as p t . 
 
 The reader may show, if he likes, that both the negative part
 
 116 ELECTHOSTATICS. 
 
 and the positive part of the zero charge of any conductor, ex- 
 cept An is less than J/i. 
 
 Letp u be the value of the potential function in a conductor 
 A L charged with a single unit of electricity, and standing in 
 the presence of a number of other conductors all uncharged 
 and insulated. Then if Pui Pizt Pu-> etc., are, under these cir- 
 cumstances, the values of the potential functions in the other 
 conductors, A^ A^ A, etc., the potential functions in these 
 conductors will be M l p 12 , M 1 p l3 , M^pu, etc., if A l be charged 
 with Mi units of electricity instead of with one unit. This is 
 evident, for we may superpose a number of distributions which 
 are singly in equilibrium upon a set of conductors, and get a 
 new distribution in equilibrium where the density is the sum of 
 the densities of the component distributions, and the value of 
 the resulting potential function the sum of the values of their 
 potential functions. 
 
 If A! be discharged and insulated, and a charge 3/ 2 be given 
 to A 2 , the values of the potential functions in the different con- 
 ductors may be written 
 
 etc. 
 
 If now we give to A l and A 2 at the same time the charges J/i 
 and M., respectively, and keep the other conductors insulated, 
 the result will be equivalent to superposing the second distribu- 
 tion, which we have just considered, upon the first, and the con- 
 ductors will be respectively at potentials, 
 
 MiPii + MaPsLj MiPu + M 2 p<a, M 1 p 13 + M 2 p 2R , etc. [167] 
 
 If all the conductors are simultaneously charged with quanti- 
 ties MI, M 2 , Jfy, J/4, etc., of electricity respectively, the value 
 of the potential function on A k will be 
 
 V k = M lPlk + M 2 p, k + 3/3^3, + + M kPut + M n p HM [108] 
 
 "Writing this in the form V k =, a k + M k p kk , we see that if the 
 charges on all the conductors except A k be unchanged, a* will be 
 constant, and that every addition of units of electricity to
 
 ELECTROSTATICS. 117 
 
 the charge of A k raises the value of the potential function in 
 it by unity. If we solve the n equations like [168] for the 
 charges, we shall get n equations of the form 
 
 M* = T 7 ! q lt + V, q, k + F 3 q, k + - + V k q kk + - + V n q nk , [169] 
 where the ^'s are functions of the p's. 
 
 If all the conductors except^ are connected with the earth, 
 3/ A = V k q kk , and q kk is evidently -the charge which, under these 
 circumstances, must be given to A k in order to raise the value 
 of the potential function in it by unity. It is to be noticed that 
 
 # u and are in general different. 
 p kk 
 
 The charge which must be given to a conductor when all the 
 conductors which surround it are in communication with the 
 earth, in order to raise the value of the potential function with- 
 in that conductor from zero to unity, shall be called the 
 capacity of the conductor. It is evident that the capacity of a 
 conductor thus defined depends upon its shape and upon the 
 shape and position of the conductors in its neighborhood. 
 
 60. Distribution of Electricity on a Spherical Conductor. 
 Considerations of symmetry show that if a charge J/ be given 
 to a conducting sphere of radius r, removed from the influence 
 of all electricity except its own, the charge will arrange itself 
 uniformly over the surface, so that the superficial density shall 
 
 be everywhere o- = - o - 
 
 The value, at the centre of the sphere, of the potential function 
 
 due to the charge 3/on the surface is , and, since the potential 
 
 r 
 
 function is constant inside a charged conductor, this must be 
 the value of the potential function throughout the sphere. If M 
 
 is equal to r, = 1 ; hence the capacity of a spherical conductor 
 r 
 
 removed from the influence of all electricity except its own. is 
 numerically equal to the radius of its surface.
 
 118 ELECTROSTATICS. 
 
 61. Distribution of a Given Charge on an Ellipsoid. It is 
 evident from the discussion of bomoaoids in Chapter I. that a 
 charge of electricity arranged (on a conductor) iu the form of 
 a shell, bounded by ellipsoidal surfaces similar to each other 
 (and to the surface of the conductor) , and similarly placed, 
 would be in equilibrium if the conductor were removed from the 
 action of all electricity except its own. We may use this prin- 
 ciple to help us to find the distribution of a given charge on a 
 conducting ellipsoid. 
 
 Let us consider a shell of homogeneous matter bounded by 
 two similar, similarly placed, and concentric ellipsoidal surfaces, 
 whose semi-axes shall be respectively a, &, c, and (l-|- a )<^ 
 (1 +a)6, (1 +a)c. If any line be drawn from the centre of 
 the shell so as to cut both surfaces, the tangent planes to these 
 two surfaces at the points of intersection will be parallel, and 
 the distance between the planes is jpa, where p is the length 
 of the perpendicular let fall from the centre upon the nearer of 
 the planes. 
 
 If p is the volume deusit}- of the matter of which the shell is 
 composed, the mass of the shell is M=^Trabc [(1 + a) 3 1] p, 
 and the rate at which the matter is spread upon the unit of sur- 
 face is, at any point, cr = pS, where 8 is the thickness of the 
 shell measured on the line of force which passes through the 
 point in question. Eliminating p from these equations, we have 
 
 M8 
 
 (1701 
 
 If, now, in accordance with the hypothesis that the thickness of 
 the electric charge on a conductor is inappreciable, we make a 
 smaller and smaller, noticing that 8 differs from pa by an infini- 
 tesimal of an order higher than the first, we shall have for a 
 strictly surface distribution, 
 
 0- = -*-. [171] 
 
 4irabc 
 
 If the equation of the surface of the ellipsoidal conductor is 
 
 *L + yL+?L-i 
 
 a? ^ W ^ <? "' '
 
 ELECTROSTATICS. 119 
 
 we have 
 
 ! = (ETZT?. 
 
 p \a 4 b* c 4 ' 
 
 and 
 
 This last expression shows that, as c is made smaller and 
 smaller, o- approaches more and more nearly the value 
 
 M 
 
 [172] 
 
 47ra& x 1-- 
 
 \ a 2 b- 
 
 and this gives some idea of the distribution on a thin elliptical 
 plate whose semi-axes are a and 6. 
 
 For a circular plate, we may put a = 6 in the last expression, 
 which gives 
 
 [173] 
 
 for the surface density at a point r units distant from the centre 
 of the plate. 
 
 The charge M distributed according to this law on both sides 
 of a circular plate of radius a raises the plate to potential 
 
 dr irM 
 
 V = ^ C 
 
 a /o 
 
 so that'the capacity of the plate is 
 
 2. [174] 
 
 7T 
 
 62. Spherical Condensers. If a conducting sphere A of radius 
 r (Fig. 41) be surrounded by a concentric spherical conducting 
 shell B of radii r, and r and charged with m units of electricity 
 while B is uncharged and insulated, we shall have 
 
 (1) the charge m uniformly distributed upon S, the surface 
 of the sphere ; 
 
 (2) an induced charge m (Section 57) uniformly distributed 
 upon $<, the inner surface of B ;
 
 120 ELECTHOSTATICS. 
 
 (3) a charge +m (since the total charge of B is zero) uni- 
 formly distributed on S , the outer surface of B. 
 
 FIG. 41. 
 The value at the centre of the sphere of the potential function 
 
 7J7 *??? 77? 
 
 due to all these distributions is V A = ---- 1 -- , and this is 
 
 r r t r 
 
 the value of V throughout the conducting sphere. The value of 
 
 7/i 
 
 the potential function in B is V B = 
 
 ' a 
 
 If now a charge M be communicated to jB, this will add itself 
 to the charge m already existing on S , and the charge on /S, : will 
 be undisturbed. The values of the potential functions in the 
 conductors are now 
 
 - r m m m + M . rr m + M 
 
 If now B be connected with the earth so as to make V B = 0, 
 the charges on S and S { will be undisturbed, but the charge on 
 
 Wb 7/1 
 
 S will disappear. V A is now equal to ---- 
 
 r r t 
 
 If A were uncharged, and B had the charge 3f, this charge 
 would be uniformly distributed upon S , for, since the whole 
 charge on S is zero, the whole charge on $ ( must be zero also. 
 It is easy to see that S and /S^must both be in a state of nature, 
 for if not, lines of force must start from S and end at ,-, and 
 others start at S t and end at S, which is absurd.
 
 ELECTROSTATICS. 
 
 121 
 
 If A were put to earth by means of a fine insulated wire 
 passing through a tiny hole in .B, and if B were insulated aud 
 charged with M units of electricity, we should have a charge x 
 on S, a charge x on S^ and a charge M-\-x on S . To find 
 
 ic, we need only remember that F A = - -+ -| - = 0, whence 
 
 x may be obtained. Ti r '" 
 
 If B be put to earth, and A be connected by means of the fine 
 wire just mentioned, with an electrical machine which keeps its 
 prime conductor constantly at potential Fi, A will receive a charge 
 y and will be put at potential Fi. To find y, it is to be noticed 
 that there is a charge y on 6',, aud no charge on , which is 
 
 ?/ ?/ 
 put to earth. V A = '- = Fi, whence y may be obtained. 
 
 If r = 99 millimeters and r,-= 100 millimeters, y= 9900 FJ. 
 
 If a sphere, equal in size to A but having no shell about it, 
 were connected with the same prime conductor, it too would 
 receive a charge z sufficient to raise it to potential F t , and z 
 
 would be determined by the equation Fi= - If r = 99. we have 
 
 r 
 z = 99 Fi ; hence we see that A, when surrounded by B at 
 
 potential zero, is able to take one hundred times as great a 
 charge from a given machine as it could take if B were removed. 
 In other words, B increases A's capacity one hundred fold. 
 A and B together constitute what is called a condenser. 
 
 FIG. 42. 
 
 If A of the condenser AB, both parts of which are supposed 
 uncharged, be connected by a fine wire (Fig. 42) with a sphere
 
 122 . ELECTROSTATICS. 
 
 A' which has the same radius as A, and is charged to potential 
 Vit A and A' will now be at the same potential [F 2 ], and A will 
 have the charge cc, and A the charge y. The total quantity of 
 electricity on A at first was rFi, so that x + y = rV^ and 
 
 v =y=-- +_, 
 
 2 ~r~~r i\ r ' 
 whence x and y may be found. 
 
 The reader may study for himself the electrical condition of 
 the different parts of two equal spherical condensers (Fig. 43) , 
 
 FIG. 43. 
 
 of which the outer surface S of one is connected with an elec- 
 tric machine at potential Fi, and the inside of the other, $', is 
 connected with the earth. The two condensers, which are sup- 
 posed to be so far apart as to be removed from each other's 
 influence, illustrate the case of two Leyden jars arranged in 
 cascade. 
 
 63. Condensers made of Two Parallel Conducting Plates. 
 Suppose two infinite conducting planes A and B to be parallel 
 to each other at a distance a apart ; choose a point of the 
 plane A for origin, and take the axis of x perpendicular to the 
 planes, so that their equations shall be x = and x = a. Let the 
 planes be charged and kept at potentials V A and V B respectively. 
 It is evident from considerations of symmetry that the potential 
 function at the point P between the two planes depends only 
 upon P's x coordinate, so that 
 
 D,V=0, AF=0, n s F=0, D.*V=Q.
 
 ELECTROSTATICS. 123 
 
 Laplace's Equation gives, then, 
 
 D,*V=0, 
 
 whence D Z V= 07, and V=Cx + D. 
 
 If x = 0, V= V A ; and if x = a, F= F* ; so that 
 
 F=F*-F* + F,, and D Z V=^- 
 
 The lines of force are parallel between the planes, and the 
 surface densities of the charges on A and B are 
 
 - and - -- - respectively. 
 
 If we take a portion of area S out of the middle of each plate, 
 
 Of / "I / TV" \ 
 
 there will be a quantity of electricity on S A equal to ' - , 
 
 and an equal quantity of the other kind of electricity on S B . 
 The force of attraction between S A and S B will be 2iro*'S, or 
 
 s (V H -V A Y 
 
 STT ft 2 
 
 If S B be put to earth, the charge that must be given to S A in 
 order to raise it to potential unity is 
 
 S ' 
 
 In other words, the capacity of S A is inversely proportional to 
 the distance between the plates. 
 
 In the case of two thin conducting plates placed parallel to and 
 opposite each other, at a distance small compared with their 
 areas, the lines of force are practically parallel except in the 
 immediate vicinity of the edges of the plates ;* and we may infer 
 
 V B 
 FIG. 44. 
 
 * See Maxwell's Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, Vol. I. Fig. XII.
 
 124 ELECTROSTATICS. 
 
 from the results of this section that the capacity of a condenser 
 consisting of two parallel conducting plates of area $, separated 
 by a layer of air of thickness a, when one of its plates is put to 
 
 O 
 
 earth is very approximately - for large values of - 
 
 4?ra a 
 
 64. Capacity of a Long Cylinder, surrounded by a Concentric 
 Cylindrical Shell. In the case of an infinite, conducting cylinder 
 of radius r f , kept at potential V t and surrounded by a concentric 
 conducting cylindrical shell of radii r and r', kept at potential 
 V , we have symmetry about the axis of the cylinder, so that 
 D$ V= 0, and Laplace's Equation reduces to the form 
 
 whence, for all points of empty space between the cylinder and 
 its shell, V=C + Dlogr. 
 
 But F= Vi when r = r^ and V= V when r= r , 
 
 hence V= 
 
 and 
 
 FIG. 45. 
 
 The surface densities of the electricity on the outer surface 
 of the cylinder and the inner surface of the shell are respectively
 
 ELECTROSTATICS. 125 
 
 r '- r - v '~ v >. 
 
 4irrlo!f 
 
 so that the charge on the unit of length of the cylinder is 
 
 F F 
 
 ! - -, and the charge on the corresponding portion of the 
 
 2 log!! 
 r t 
 
 inner surface of the shell is the negative of this. We may find 
 the capacity of the unit length of the cylinder by putting F" = 
 
 and Fj = 1, whence capacity = -- 
 
 2 log 1 
 r t 
 
 If r in tins expression is made very large, the capacity of the 
 cylinder will be very small. 
 
 In the case of a fine wire connecting two conductors, r, will 
 be very small, and there will be no conducting shell nearer than 
 the walls of the room, so that the capacity of such a wire is 
 plainly negligible. 
 
 65. Specific Inductive Capacity. In all our work up to this 
 time we have supposed conductors to be separated from each 
 other by electrically indifferent media, which simply prevent 
 the passage of electricity from one conductor to another. We 
 have no reason to believe, however, that such media exist. in 
 nature. Experiment shows, for instance, that the capacity of 
 a given spherical condenser depends essentially upon the kind 
 of insulating material used to separate the sphere from its 
 shell, so that this material, without conducting electricity. 
 modifies the action of the charges on the conductors. Insu- 
 lators, when considered as transmitting electric action, are 
 sometimes called dielectrics. 
 
 Whatever may really be the physical natures of the sub- 
 stances, such as glass, parafline, ebonite, etc., which we com- 
 monly use as insulators, it has been shown that their behavior 
 would be fairly well accounted for on the supposition that they
 
 126 ELECTROSTATICS. 
 
 are made up of truly insulating matter in which are imbedded, 
 at little distances from one another, small, conducting par- 
 ticles. It is evident that every such particle, if lying in a 
 field of force, would be polarized ; that is, one part would be 
 charged positively by induction, and the part most remote 
 from this would be charged negatively, and that these induced 
 charges would have some influence in determining the values 
 of the potential function at points in the dielectric and in the 
 conductors adjacent to it. 
 
 Using the notation of Section 62, let the part A of a spheri- 
 cal condenser be charged with m units of positive electricity 
 and separated from the part .B, which is put to earth, by a 
 spherical shell of radii r and r t made up of a given dielectric. 
 Let us first ask ourselves what the effect of the dielectric would 
 be if it consisted of extremely thin concentric conducting spheri- 
 cal shells separated by extremely thin insulating spaces. It is 
 evident that in this case we should have a quantity m of elec- 
 tricity induced on the inside of the innermost shell, a quantity 
 -\-m on the outside of this shell, a quantity m on the inner 
 surface of the next shell, a quantity +m on the outside of this 
 shell, and so on. If there were n such shells in the dielectric 
 layer, and n + 1 spaces, and if 8 were the distance from the 
 inner surface of one shell to the inner surface of the next, 
 and AS the thickness of each shell, the value, at the centre of 
 A, of the potential function due to the charges on these shells, 
 would be 
 
 1 1 1 1 
 
 y'=m\ 
 
 A 
 
 r A3 + 8 r + 28 r- 
 1 1 r 
 
 -AS + 28 
 
 1 1 
 
 r + ?iS 
 i_ 
 
 r AS + rtSj 
 
 (r AS-f 8) (r+28)(r AS+28) 
 
 This quantity lies between 
 
 t-n
 
 ELECTROSTATICS. 127 
 
 2 g 
 
 but these differ from each other by less than e = TO AS ^-^ , so 
 
 that mA I , which is easily seen to lie between 
 
 Jr y? 
 
 G and //, differs from F/ by less than e. If, then, 8 is very 
 
 small in comparison with r and r i5 F a ' differs from m\(- -} 
 
 Vi r J 
 by an exceedingly small fraction of its own value. 
 
 This shows that the effect, at the centre of A, of such a 
 system of conducting shells as we have imagined would be 
 practically the same as if a charge m A were given to the 
 inner surface of the dielectric, and a charge +?A to its outer 
 surface, while the charges on the surfaces of the thin shells 
 within the mass of the dielectric were taken away. That is, 
 the value of the potential function in A would be 
 
 m(l A)( ] instead of 
 
 V r 'J 
 
 Such a system of shells introduced into what we have hitherto 
 supposed to be the electrically inert insulating matter between 
 the two parts of a spherical condenser would increase the capa- 
 city of the condenser in the ratio of 1 to 1 A. It is to be 
 noticed that A is a proper fraction : A = and A = 1 would 
 correspond respectively to a perfect insulator and to a perfect 
 conductor. 
 
 As Dr. E. II. Hall has suggested to me, the result given 
 above might be easily obtained by computing* the amount of 
 work done in moving a unit particle of electricity (supposed 
 to be concentrated at a point, and not to disturb existing dis- 
 tributions) from A to B. It is easy to see that the force at 
 any point in the mass of one of the thin conducting shells 
 would be zero, and that the force at any point in the space 
 between two shells would be exactly the same as if then' were 
 no shells in the dielectric. We have no reason to think that 
 there are any such differences between the values of the force 
 at contiguous points in the dielectric as this would indicate, 
 and the conception of the thin shells has been introduced only 
 
 * Mascart et Joubert, Lemons sur I'Elcctricite, 124.
 
 128 ELECTROSTATICS. 
 
 because the effect of these shells can be more easily computed 
 thau that of a number of discrete particles. 
 
 "When, however, the dielectric between the parts of a spheri- 
 cal condenser is supposed to contain not a system of continuous 
 shells, but a number of separate conducting particles, these are 
 often regarded as forming a series of concentric layers, and it is 
 assumed that the sum of the charges induced on the inner 
 sides of the particles in the innermost layer is A'm, where 
 A' is a proper fraction, larger or smaller in different dielectrics 
 according as the particles are nearer together or farther apart, 
 and that the inner surfaces of all the other layers have each 
 the same charge, and the outer surface of every layer the cor- 
 responding positive charge -f- X'm. The effect of this kind of 
 dielectric, if made to replace a perfect insulator in our calcu- 
 lations, would be to increase the capacity of the condenser in 
 the ratio 1 to 1 p., where p. = A/A, and it is evident that the 
 same effect might be produced by a charge p.m on that 
 surface of the dielectric which touches A, and a charge + p,m 
 on that surface which is in contact with B. 
 
 Experiment shows that dielectrics used to separate and to 
 surround charged conductors behave, in many respects, as if 
 every surface in contact with a conductor had a charge opposite 
 in sign to that of the conductor, and in absolute value p. times 
 as great, p. being less thau unit}*, and constant for any one 
 dielectric. That is, if the dielectric separating from each other 
 a number of conductors be displaced by another, the capacities 
 of all the conductors will be changed in the same ratio, depend- 
 ing only upon the natures of the two dielectrics. 
 
 The ratio of the fraction , in the case of any dielectric to 
 
 1 A* 
 
 the same fraction in the case of 'air, for which p. is very 
 nearly the same as for what we call a vacuum, is called the 
 specific inductive capacity of the dielectric in question. This 
 ratio is greater than unity for all solid and liquid dielectrics 
 with which we are acquainted. The specific inductive capacity 
 of a perfect conductor would be infinite.
 
 ELECTROSTATICS. 129 
 
 The following very clear statement of the effect produced by 
 changing the dielectric which envelops the parts of a condenser 
 made of two plates, is due to Dr. Hall, and is copied with his 
 permission : 
 
 "The fundamental fact concerning static electrical induction 
 as observed by Faraday is this,* that if the two plates of a 
 condenser, separated by air, receive respectively e l and e., 
 units of electricity when charged to a certain difference of 
 potential, e.g., by connection with the poles of a battery of 
 many cells in series, the same two plates would, if anv other 
 medium were substituted for the air, other conditions remaining 
 unchanged, receive respectively Ke l and Ke units of electric- 
 ity, K being some quantity greater than unity. This quantity 
 .fiT is called the specific inductive capacity of the second medium. 
 
 " Now, since the difference of potential between A and B is 
 the same in these two cases, the 'electromotive intensity, 'f ?.e., 
 the force exerted upon unit quantity of electricity, is the same 
 in the two cases at any given point lying in the region through 
 which the change of dielectric extends. If we were to attempt 
 to determine the surface densities of the charges of the conduc- 
 tors by means of the equation \ 
 
 the values obtained would be the same for both cases. These 
 would be the actual values of the surface densities if air were 
 used, but would evidently not be the actual surface densities 
 for the other case. For this latter case, the values thus found 
 are called the 'apparent' surface densities, and bear to the 
 true densities the ratio 1 to A'. 
 
 " We must not conclude from this that A and 7? with charges 
 Ke { and I\e.> respectively in the second medium would act, 
 
 * Max well's Treatise on Flectn'riti/ and ^f^/}neti.nn, Art. f>2. 
 t Maxwell's Treatise nn Electricity and Magnetism, Art. 44. 
 t Maxwell's Treatise on E/ertriciti/ and Magnetism, First Edition, Art. 83. 
 See, also, Section 47 of this book.
 
 130 ELECTROSTATICS. 
 
 in all electrical respects, like the same bodies with charges e^ 
 and e 2 in air. Two spheres, A and -B, in air, with centres at 
 distance r from each other, and having charges e x and e 2 
 
 respectively, would attract each other with a force 1 2 , whereas 
 
 <r 
 the same two spheres with actual charges Ke^ and Ke 2 in a 
 
 medium of specific inductive capacity K would attract each 
 
 other with a force* ^ ?. This seems at first inconsistent 
 
 r 
 
 with the fact that the electromotive intensity at any point, as 
 stated above, is the same in both cases. The electromotive 
 intensity at any point, however, meaus the force that would be 
 exerted upon unit actual quantity of electricity at that point, 
 not the force that would be exerted upon unit apparent quan- 
 tity. S6 the average force exerted by A's charge upon B'a 
 
 charge in either of our two cases is for each actual unit of 
 B's charge. Hence, the total force exerted by A upon .B is 
 
 -L.2 for the first case, and '~ for the second case, as stated 
 r r~ 
 
 before." 
 
 66. Charge induced on a Sphere by a Charge at an Outside 
 Point. The value at any point P of the potential function due 
 to m 1 units of positive electricity concentrated at a point A^ and 
 m 2 units of negative electricity concentrated at a point A 2> is 
 
 m l m 2 
 V = --- where ^ = A 1 P and r 2 = A 2 P. 
 
 1\ T 2 
 
 It is easy to see that if m 1 is greater than w 2 , so that ?% = Xm 2 
 where A > 1 , V will be equal to zero all over a certain sphere 
 which surrounds A z . 
 
 If (Fig. 46) we let A^=a, A 1 = 8 1 , A 2 = 8 2 , OD = r, 
 it is eas to see that 
 
 X 2 a, a <i a 2 A 2 
 
 2 _ 
 
 n , 
 A 2 1 K- 1 (A/ I) 
 
 * Maxwell's Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, Art. 94.
 
 ELECTROSTATICS. 131 
 
 and a = 8 -^^^l. [176] 
 
 1 2 
 
 If PR represents the force / t due to the electricity at A^ and 
 PQ the force / 2 due to the electricity at A 2 , the line of action of 
 the resultant force F (represented by PL} must pass through 
 the centre of the sphere, since the surface of the sphere is equi- 
 potential. 
 
 FIG. 46. 
 
 The triangles A 1 PO and A 2 PO are mutually equiangular, for 
 they have a common angle AfiP, and the sides including that 
 angle are proportional (r = 8 l &. 2 ). Hence, from the triangles 
 QPL and A t PA s ^ by the Theorem of Sines, 
 
 sn a 
 
 "sinC^-a,)' 
 
 7 SL ' - C 178 ] 
 
 Sin (03 ajy 
 
 , -r, af, am, aXm, ri-m 
 
 whence F= l = [I'^J 
 
 r 2 r 2 rf' 7'j 3 
 
 Now, according to Section oO, we ma}- distribute upon the 
 spherical surface just considered a quantity m 2 of negative elec- 
 tricity in such a way that the effect of this distribution at all 
 points outside the sphere shall be equal to the effect of the 
 charge m 2 concentrated at J.,, and the effect at points within 
 the sphere shall be equal and opposite to the effect of the charge 
 mi concentrated at A^. Since F is the force at P in the direc-
 
 132 ELECTROSTATICS. 
 
 tion of the interior normal to the sphere, we shall accomplish 
 this if we make the surface density at every point equal to o-, 
 where 
 
 -(V-r) 2 m 1; 
 a 
 
 and if we now take away the charge at A^ the value of the po- 
 tential function throughout the space enclosed by our spherical 
 surface, and upon the surface itself, will be zero. If the spheri- 
 cal surface were made conducting, and were connected with the 
 earth by a fine wire, there would be no change in the charge of 
 the sphere, and we have discovered the amount and the distri- 
 bution of the electricity induced upon a sphere of radius r, con- 
 nected with the earth by a fine wire and exposed to the action 
 of a charge of ?% units of positive electricity concentrated at a 
 point at a distance 81 from the centre of the sphere. 
 
 If now we break the connection with the earth, and distribute 
 a charge m uniformly over the sphere in addition to the present 
 distribution, the potential function will be constant (although 
 no longer zero) within the sphere, and we have a case of equi- 
 librium, for we have superposed one case of equilibrium (where 
 there is a uniform charge on the sphere and none at A^) upon 
 another. The whole charge on the sphere is now 
 
 IT in, m ^ , 
 
 and the value of the potential function within it and upon the 
 surface, 
 
 V M .mi_m 
 r 8 1 r 
 
 If the conducting sphere were at the beginning insulated and 
 uncharged, we should have M = 0, and therefore 
 
 - ^ ~ A and F= l - [181] 
 
 i / i 
 
 If we have given that the conducting sphere, under the influ- 
 ence of the electricity concentrated at A is at potential Fi, we
 
 ELECTROSTATICS. 133 
 
 know that its total charge must be V l r , an( j jtg surface 
 density 
 
 \ rf 
 
 It is easy to see that the sphere and its charge will be at- 
 tracted toward A l with the force 
 
 g i /*s ^\a s r 
 
 and the student should notice that, under certain circumstances, 
 this expression will be negative and the force repulsive. 
 
 If m l = ?)i 2 , the surface of zero potential is an infinite plane, 
 and our equations give us the charge induced on a conducting 
 plane by a charge at a point outside the plane. 
 
 The method of this section enables us to find also the capacity 
 of a condenser composed of two conducting cylindrical surf aces, 
 parallel to each other, but eccentric ; for a whole set of the 
 equipotential surfaces due to two parallel, infinite straight lines, 
 charged uniformly with equal quantities per unit of length of 
 opposite kinds of electricity, are eccentric cylindrical surfaces- 
 surrounding one of the lines A.,, and leaving the other line A t 
 outside. "We may therefore choose two of these surfaces, dis- 
 tribute the charge of A l on the outer of these, and the charge 
 of A 2 on the inner, by the aid of the principles laid down in 
 Section 50, so as to leave the values of the potential function 
 on these surfaces the same as before. These distributions thus 
 found will remain unchanged if the equipotential surfaces are 
 made conducting. 
 
 The reader who wishes to study this method more at length 
 should consult, under the head of Electric Images, the works of 
 Gumming, Maxwell, Mascart. and Watson and Burbury, as well 
 as original papers on the subject by Murphy in the Philosophical 
 Magazine, 1833, p. 350, and by Sir "W. Thomson in the Cam- 
 bridge and Dublin Mathematical Journal for 1848.
 
 134 ELECTROSTATICS. 
 
 67. The Energy of Charged Conductors. If a conductor of 
 capacity (7, removed from the action of all electricity except its 
 own, be charged with M l units of electricity, so that it is at 
 
 M 
 
 potential V\ 1 , the amount of work required to bring up to 
 C 
 
 the conductor, little by little, from the walls of the room, the 
 additional charge Am, is A W, which is greater than V\ &.M or 
 
 AJf, and less than ( FI + A^F) ^ M or 
 
 C 
 
 If the charge be increased from M l to M 2 by a constant flow, 
 the amount of work required is evidently 
 
 The work required to bring up the charge M to the conductor 
 at first uncharged is then 
 
 M 2 CV 2 MV 
 
 2(7 2 2 
 
 [185] 
 
 This is evidently equal to the potential energy of the charged 
 conductor, and this is independent of the method by which the 
 conductor has been charged. 
 
 If, now, we have a series of conductors A^ A 2 , vl 3 , etc., in the 
 presence of each other at potentials FI, F 2 , F 3 , etc., and having 
 respectively the charges M^ M 2 , M 3 , etc., and if we change all 
 the charges in the ratio of # to 1, we shall have a new state of 
 equilibrium in which the charges are xM^ xM 2 , xM 3 , etc. ; and 
 the values of the potential functions within the conductors are 
 icFi, o?F 2 , xV s , etc. The work (ATF) required to increase the 
 charges in the ratio x + Aaj instead of in the ratio x is greater 
 than 
 
 ' (M l Aa?) ( FI) -(- (M s Ax) (a; F 2 ) + ( M 2 Aa?) (a; F:,) + etc. , 
 
 or x &x[Mi FI + M. 2 F 2 + M z F 3 + etc.] , 
 
 and less than 
 
 (x + Aaj) Aa- [JtfiFi +M 2 V 2 +M 3 V a + etc.] ;
 
 ELECTROSTATICS. 135 
 
 hence the whole amount of work required to change the ratio 
 from to -^ is 
 
 W, - W, = x *~ x * [3/ t F + 3/, F 2 + 3/3 F 3 + etc.] . [186] 
 
 MI 
 
 If in this equation we put x l = and x 2 1 , we get for the 
 work required to charge the conductor from the neutral state to 
 potentials F 15 F 2 , F 3 , 
 
 [187] 
 
 68. If a series of conductors A^ A. 2 , A 3 , etc., are far enough 
 apart not to be exposed to inductive action from one another. 
 and have capacities C^ C 2 , C s , etc., and charges 37, , 3/ 2 , 3/$, etc., 
 so as to be at potentials F 1? F 2 , T 7 "., etc., where 3/i=dFi, 
 3/ 2 = C 2 F 2 , 3/ 3 = (7 3 F 3 , etc., we may connect them together by 
 means of fine wires whose capacities we may neglect, and thus 
 obtain a single conductor of capacity 
 
 The charge on this composite conductor is evidently 
 
 3/ x + 3/ 2 + 3/ 3 + - = ( 3/ ) ; 
 
 and if we call the value of the potential function within it F, we 
 shall have ^-^ ^-^ 
 
 V'2^(C) =2/30; 
 
 whence F= ^^dl^i^l, [188] 
 
 ^i ~r ^2 ~r t-'s ~r 
 
 a formula obtained, it is to be noticed, on the assumption that 
 the conductors do not influence each other. 
 
 The energy of the separate charged conductors before being 
 connected toether was 
 
 V 
 Jf\
 
 136 ELECTROSTATICS. 
 
 and the energy of the composite conductor is 
 w , = i(3 
 
 ~r ^2 ~r ^3 ~r 
 
 ^ 
 
 [190] 
 
 which is always less than E unless the separate conductors were 
 all at the same potential in the beginning. 
 
 EXAMPLES. 
 
 1. Show that in general the surface density of a charge dis- 
 tributed on a conductor is greatest at points where the convex 
 curvature of the surface of the conductor is greatest. 
 
 2. A hollow in a conductor is at the uniform potential Fi 
 when a charge is communicated to a conductor within the cavity 
 sufficient to raise this conductor to potential V 2 if it were in 
 empty space. Give some idea of the changes brought about by 
 this charge. 
 
 3. Show that a field of electric force consists wholly of 
 non-conductors bounded, if at all, by conducting surfaces. 
 
 4. Prove that if a distribution of electricity over a closed 
 surface produce a force at every point of the surface perpendic- 
 ular to it, this distribution will produce a potential function con- 
 stant within the surface. 
 
 5. Two conducting spheres of radii 6 and 8 respectively 
 are connected by a long fine wire, and are supposed not to be 
 exposed to each other's influences. If a charge of 70 units of 
 electricity be given to the composite conductors, show that 30 
 units will go to charge the smaller sphere and 40 units to the 
 larger sphere, if we neglect the capacity of the wire. Show 
 
 t? ^) 
 
 also that the tension in the case of the smaller sphere is - 
 
 Z007T 
 
 per square unit of surface.
 
 ELECTROSTATICS. 137 
 
 6. An uncharged sphere A, of radius r, occupies the centre 
 of the otherwise empty, equipotential cavity, enclosed by a 
 spherical shell B of radii r, and r , so large that the effect inside 
 the cavity of the charge induced on B by a charge m, communi- 
 cated to A from without, may be neglected. If the value of the 
 potential function within the cavity before A was charged was 
 
 O, at what potential is A now ? Ans. C + . 
 
 r 
 
 7. The first of three conducting spheres, ^.1, B, and (7, of 
 radii 3, 2, and 1 respectively, remote from one another, is 
 charged to potential 9. If A be connected with B for an 
 instant, by means of a fine wire, and if then B be connected 
 with C in the same way, C"s charge will be 3-G. [Stone.] If, 
 in the last example, all three conductors be connected at the 
 same time, C"s charge will be 4-.~>. 
 
 8. A charge of M units of electricity is communicated to a 
 composite conductor made up of two widely-separated ellipsoidal 
 conductors, of semiaxes 2, 3, 4 and 4, 0, 8 respectively, con- 
 nected by a fine wire. Show that the charges on the two ellip- 
 soids will be -M and - 37" respectively. [Stone.] 
 
 a ;"> 
 
 9. Can two electrified bodies repel each other when no lines 
 of force can be drawn from one body to the other? 
 
 10. Two conductors, A and B, connected with the earth are 
 exposed to the inductive action of a third charged body. Do 
 A and B act upon each other? If so, how? 
 
 11. Show that two equal conductors similarly placed with re- 
 spect to each other always repel each other if raised to the same 
 potentials and insulated ; but that if the volume of the potential 
 function within the conductors differ never so little from each 
 other, they will repel each other at great distances, hut at very 
 near distances (supposing no spark to pass) they will attract 
 each other. [Cummings.] 
 
 12. The superficial density has the same sign at all points of 
 a conducting surface outside which there is no free electricity. 
 
 13. Show that r-i-B of the unit tubes of force proceeding
 
 138 ELECTROSTATICS. 
 
 from an electrified particle, at a distance 8 from the centre of a 
 conducting sphere of radius r, which is put to earth, meet the 
 sphere if there are no other conductors in the neighborhood, 
 and that the rest go off to "infinity." 
 
 14. A charged insulated conductor A is so surrounded by a 
 number of separate conductors _B, (7, Z>, , which are put to 
 earth, that no straight line can be drawn from any point of A 
 to the walls of the room without encountering one of these other 
 conductors : will there be any induced charge on the walls of 
 the room? See Section 37. 
 
 15. Two uniform straight wires of equal density, each two 
 inches long, lie separated by an interval of one inch in the 
 same straight line. Find the equation of the equipotential sur- 
 faces due to these wires, and find what must be the density of a 
 superficial distribution of matter on one of these surfaces which 
 at all outside points would exert the same attraction as the 
 wires do. 
 
 1C. An insulated conducting sphere of radius r charged with 
 m units of positive electricity is influenced by ra units of posi- 
 tive electricity concentrated at a point 2r distant from the cen- 
 tre of the sphere. Give approximately the general shape of the 
 equipotential surfaces in the neighborhood of the sphere. 
 
 Give an instance of a positively electrified body whose poten- 
 tial is negative. 
 
 17. A conductor, the equation of whose surface is 
 
 ^. + id + *1 = i 
 
 25 16 9 
 
 is charged with 80 units of electricity ; what is the density at a 
 point for which x = 3, y 3? 
 
 If the density at this point be a, what is the whole charge on 
 the ellipsoid ? 
 
 18. Prove that the capacity of n equal spherical condensers 
 
 when arranged in cascade is onlv about -th of the capacitv of 
 
 n 
 
 one of the condensers ; but that if the inner spheres of all the
 
 ELECTROSTATICS. 139 
 
 condensers be connected together by fine wires, and the outer 
 conductors be also connected together, the capacity of the com- 
 plex condenser thus found is about n times that of a single 
 
 * O 
 
 one of the condensers. 
 
 19. Prove that if the charges of a system of conductors be 
 increased, the increment of the energy of the system is equal to 
 half the sum of the products of the increase in the charge first 
 conducted into the sum of the values of the potential function 
 within it at the beginning and the end of the process, or to half 
 the sum of the products of the increment of the value of the 
 potential function in each conductor into the sum of the original 
 and final charges on that conductor. [Maxwell.] 
 
 20. Prove that if the charges of a fixed system of conductors 
 be increased, the sum of the products of the original charge and 
 the final potential of each conductor is equal to the sum of the 
 products of the final charge and the original potential. [Max- 
 well.] 
 
 21. Discuss the following passage from Maxwell's Elementary 
 Treatise on Electricity : 
 
 ' Let it be required to determine the equipotential surfaces 
 due to the electrification of the conductor C placed on an insu- 
 lating stand. Connect the conductor with one electrode of the 
 electroscope, the other being connected with the earth. Elec- 
 trify the exploring sphere,* and, carrying it by the insulating 
 handle, bring its centre to a given point. Connect the elec- 
 trodes for an instant, and then move the sphere in such a path 
 that the indication of the electroscope remains zero. This path 
 will lie on an equipotential surface." 
 
 '2'2. Prove that the coefficients of potential (;>) and induction 
 ((j) treated in Article f>l> have the following properties : 
 
 (1) The order of the suffixes of any p or any / can be inverted 
 without altering the value of the coefficient, or. in other words, 
 
 Pu = Pu< and v = 7tt- 
 
 * A very small conducting sphere fitted with an insulating handle.
 
 140 ELECTROSTATICS. 
 
 (2) All thep's are positive, but p lk is less than either p a or J9 M . 
 
 (3) Those q's whose two suffixes are the same are positive ; 
 the others are negative. That is, q kk and q tt are positive ; but 
 q u is negative and is, moreover, numerically less than either of 
 the others. 
 
 23. Prove that the following theorems (Maxwell's Elemen- 
 tary Treatise on Electricity) are contained in the statements of 
 the preceding problem : 
 
 (1) In a system of fixed insulated conductors, the potential 
 function in A k due to a charge communicated to A t is equal to 
 the potential function in A l due to an equal charge in A k . 
 
 (2) In a system of fixed conductors connected, all but one, 
 with the walls of the room, the charge induced on A k when A l 
 is raised to a given potential is equal to the charge induced on 
 AI when A k is raised to an equal potential. 
 
 (3) If in a system of fixed conductors, insulated and origi- 
 nally without charge, a charge be communicated to A k which 
 raises it to potential unity and A l to potential n, then if in the 
 same system of conductors a charge unity be communicated 
 to An and A k be connected with the earth, the charge induced 
 on A k will be n. 
 
 24. A condenser consists of a sphere A of radius 100 sur- 
 rounded by a concentric shell whose inner radius is 101 and 
 outer radius 150. The shell is put to earth, and the sphere has 
 a charge of 200 units of positive electricity. A sphere B of 
 radius 100 outside the condenser can be connected with the 
 condenser's sphere by means of a fine insulated wire passing 
 through a small hole in the shell. B is connected with A ; the 
 connection is then broken, and B is discharged ; the connection 
 is then made and broken as before, and B is again discharged. 
 After this process has been gone through with five times, what is 
 A's potential? What would it become if the shell were to be 
 removed without touching A? 
 
 25. Suppose the condenser mentioned in the last problem in- 
 sulated and a charge of 100 units of positive electricity given to
 
 ELECTROSTATICS. 141 
 
 the shell. "What will be the potential of the sphere? of the 
 shell? If we then connect the sphere with the earth by a flue 
 insulated wire passing through the shell, what will the charge on 
 the shell be ? What will be the potential of the shell ? If next 
 A be insulated, and the shell be put to earth, what will be A's 
 potential ? What will be its potential if the shell be now wholly 
 removed ? 
 
 26. A spherical conductor of radius r is surrounded by a con- 
 centric conducting spherical shell of radii T^ and 7? , and the 
 outer surface of this shell is put to earth. If the inner conduc- 
 tor be charged, show the effect at all points in space of moving 
 the conductor so that it shall be eccentric with the shell. How 
 is the capacity of the system changed by this ? 
 
 27. Prove that if the spherical surfaces of radii a and 6, 
 which form a spherical condenser, are made slightly eccentric, 
 c being the distance between their centres, the change of elec- 
 
 . .~ ,. . , ,. ... - 
 
 trification at any point of either surface is 
 
 where is the Angular distance of the point from the line of 
 centres, and where the difference between the values of the 
 potential function on the two surfaces is unity. 
 
 28. Show that if an insulated conducting sphere of radius a 
 be placed in a region of uniform force (X), acting parallel to 
 
 the axis of , the function X x\ 1 + C satisfies all the 
 
 X x\ 1 
 L r J 
 
 _ 
 conditions which the potential function outside the sphere must 
 
 satisfy, and is therefore itself the potential function. Show 
 
 that the surface density of the charge on the sphere is - . 
 [Watson and Burbury.]
 
 142 ELECTROSTATICS. 
 
 MISCELLANEOUS PROBLEMS. 
 
 1. Prove that the attraction due to a homogeneous hemi- 
 sphere of radius r is zero, at a point in the axis of the hemisphere 
 
 g 
 
 distant r approximately from the centre of the base. 
 
 2. Show that the attraction at the origin clue to the homo- 
 geneous solid bounded by the surface obtained by revolving 
 one loop of the curve r 2 = a? cos 20, is -| -n-a. 
 
 3. If the earth be considered as a homogeneous sphere of 
 radius r, and if the force of gravity at its surface be $, show 
 that from a point without the earth, at which the attraction is 
 
 - g, the area 27rr 2 l - on the surface of the earth 
 
 n 
 will be visible. 
 
 4. A spherical conductor A, of radius a, charged with M 
 units of electricity, is surrounded by n conducting spherical 
 shells concentric with it. Each shell is of thickness a, and is 
 separated from its neighbors by empty spaces of thickness a. 
 Show that the limit approached by V A as n is made larger and 
 
 M 
 
 larger is (nat. log 2), and that for a finite number of shells 
 a 
 
 y M_ C ll+x ' n+l dx. [Stone.] 
 a Jo l+x 
 
 5. If two systems of matter (M and M'), both shut in by a 
 closed surface S, give rise to potential functions ( V and F') , 
 which have equal values at every point of S, whether or not S 
 is an equipotential surface of either system, then V cannot 
 differ from V at any point outside $, and the algebraic sum of 
 the matter of either system is equal to that of the other. [See 
 Section 52, and Watson and Burbury's Mathematical Theory of 
 Electricity and Magnetism, 60.] 
 
 6. Show that if two distributions of matter have in common 
 an equipotential surface which surrounds them both, all their 
 equipotential surfaces outside this will be common.
 
 ELECTROSTATICS. 143 
 
 7. Prove that if V be the potential function clue to any dis- 
 tribution of matter over a closed surface /S', and if a-' be the 
 density of a superficial distribution on /S', which gives nse to 
 the same value of the potential function at each point of S as 
 that of a unit of matter concentrated at any given point 0, 
 then the value at O of the potential function due to the first 
 
 distribution is I V-u-'-dS.
 
 ||KSS of 
 gtrbich 
 
 Boston.
 
 'S3 
 
 Peirc,'s Three and Four Place Tables of Loga- 
 
 rithinic anil Trigonometric Functions. By JAMKS Mn.i.s PKIRCE, 
 University Professor of Mathematics in Harvard University. Quarto. 
 Cloth. Mailing Trice, 45 cts. ; Introduction, 40 cts. 
 
 Four-place tables require, in the long run, only half as much time 
 + five-place tables, one-third as much time as six-place tables, and 
 one-fourth as much as those of seven places. They are sufficient 
 for the ordinary calculations of Surveying, Civil, Mechanical, and 
 Mining Engineering, and Navigation; for the work of the Physical 
 or Chemical Laboratory, and even for many computations of Astron- 
 omy. They are also especially suited to be used in teaching, as they 
 illustrate principles as well as the larger tables, and with far less 
 expenditure of time. The present compilation has been prepared 
 with care, and is handsomely and clearly printed. 
 
 Elements of the Differential Calculus. 
 
 With Numerous Examples and Applications. Designed for Use as a 
 College Text-Book. By W. E. BYERLY, Professor of Mathematics, 
 Harvard University. 8vo. 273 pages. Mailing Price, $2.15 ; Intro- 
 duction, 2.00. 
 
 This book embodies the results of the author's experience in 
 teaching the Calculus at Cornell and Harvard Universities, and is 
 intended for a text-book, and not for an exhaustive treatise. Its 
 peculiarities are the rigorous use of the Doctrine of Limits, as a 
 foundation of the subject, and as preliminary to the adoption of the 
 more direct and practically convenient infinitesimal notation and 
 nomenclature; the early introduction of a few simple formulas and 
 methods for integrating: a rather elaborate treatment of the. use of 
 infinitesimals in pure geometry : and the attempt to excite and keep 
 up the interest of the student by bringing in throughout the whoie 
 book, and not merely at the end, numerous applications to practical 
 problems in geometry and mechanics. 
 
 James Mills Peirce, Prof, of 
 Math., H'irvard I'uiv. (From the Har- 
 
 is general without being superficial ; 
 limited to leading topics, and yet with- 
 
 vard Register) : In mathematics, as in in its limits; thorough, accurate, and 
 other branches of study, the need is , practical ; adapted to the communica- 
 now very much felt of teaching which tion of some degree of power, as well
 
 '59 
 
 as knowledge, but free from details 
 which are important only to the spe- 
 cialist. Professor Byerly's Calculus 
 appears to be designed to meet this 
 want. . . . Such a plan leaves much 
 room for the exercise of individual 
 judgment ; and differences of opinion 
 will undoubtedly exist in regard to one 
 and another point of this book. But 
 all teachers will agree that in selection, 
 arrangement, and treatment, it is, on 
 the whole, in a very high degree, wise, 
 able, marked by a true scientific spirit, 
 and calculated to develop the same 
 spirit in the learner. . . . The book 
 contains, perhaps, all of the integral 
 calculus, as well as of the differential, 
 that is necessary to the ordinary stu- 
 dent. And with so much of this great 
 scientific method, every thorough stu- 
 dent of physics, and every general 
 scholar who feels any interest in the 
 relations of abstract thought, and is 
 capable of grasping a mathematical 
 idea, ought to be familiar. One who 
 aspires to technical learning must sup- 
 plement his mastery of the elements 
 by the study of the comprehensive 
 theoretical treatises. . . . But he who is 
 thoroughly acquainted with the book 
 before us has made a long stride into 
 a sound and practical knowledge of 
 the subject of the calculus. He has 
 begun to be a real analyst. 
 
 H. A. Newton, Prof, of Math, in 
 Yale Coll., Xcw Haven : I have looked 
 it through with care, and find the sub- 
 ject very clearly and logically devel- 
 oped. 1 am strongly inclined to use it 
 in my class next year. 
 
 S. Hart, recent Prof, of Math, in 
 Trinity Coll., Conn.: The student- can 
 hardly fail, I think, to get from the book 
 an exact, and, ;it the same time, a satis- 
 factory explanation of the principles on 
 which the Calculus is based; and the 
 introduction of the simpler methods of 
 
 integration, as they are needed, enables 
 applications of those principles to be 
 introduced in such a way as to be both 
 interesting and instructive. 
 
 Charles Kraus, Techniker, Pard- 
 ubitz, Bohemia, Austria ; Indem ich 
 den Empfang Ihres Buches dankend 
 bestaetige muss ich Ihnen, hoch geehr- 
 ter Herr gestehen, dass mich dasselbe 
 sehr erfrcut hat, da es sich durch 
 grosse Reichhahigkeit, besonders klare 
 Schreibweiseund vorzuegliche Behand- 
 lung des Stoffes auszeichnet, und er- 
 weist sich dieses Werk als eine bedetit- 
 eride Bereicherung dermathematischen 
 Wissenschaft. 
 
 De Volson 'Wood, Prof, of 
 Math., Stevens' hist., Hoboken, ~N.J.: 
 To say, as I do, that it is a first-class 
 work, is probably repeating what many 
 have already said for it. I admire the 
 rigid logical character of the work, 
 and am gratified to see that so able a 
 writer has shown explicitly the relation 
 between Derivatives, Infinitesimals, and 
 Differentials. The method of Limits 
 is the true one on which to found the 
 science of the calculus. The work is 
 not only comprehensive, but no vague- 
 ness is allowed in regard to definitions 
 or fundamental principles. 
 
 Del Kemper, Prof, of Math., 
 Hampden Sidney Coll., I 'a. : My high 
 estimate of it has been amply vindi- 
 cated by its use in the class-room. 
 
 R. H. Graves, Prof, of Math., 
 Univ. of Jvorth Carolina: I have al- 
 ready decided to use it with my next 
 class ; it suits my purpose better than 
 any other book on the same subject 
 with which I am acquainted. 
 
 Edw. Brooks, Author of a Series 
 of Math. : Its statements are clear and 
 scholarly, and its methods thoroughly 
 analytic and in the spirit of the latest 
 mathematical thought.
 
 i6o 
 
 Syllabus of a Course in Plane Trigonometry. 
 
 By W. K. BYEKI.Y. 8vo. 8 pages. Mailing Price, 10 cts. 
 
 Syllabus of a Course in Plane Analytical Geom- 
 
 etry. By \V. E. BYERLY. 8vo. 12 pages. Mailing Price, 10 cts. 
 
 Syllabus of a Course in Plane Analytic Geom- 
 
 etry {Advanced Course.) By W. E. BYERLY, Professor of Mathe- 
 matics, Harvard University. 8vo. 12 pages. Mailing Price, 10 cts. 
 
 Syllabus of a Course in Analytical Geometry of 
 
 Three Dimensions. By W. E. BYERLY. 8vo. IO pages. Mailing 
 Price, 10 cts. 
 
 Syllabus of a Course on Modern Methods in 
 
 Analytic Geometry. By W. E. BYERLY. 8vo. 8 pages. Mailing 
 Price, 10 cts. 
 
 Syllabus of a Course in the Theory of Equations. 
 
 By W. E. BYERLY. 8vo. 8 pages. Mailing Price, 10 cts. 
 
 Elements of the Integral Calculus. 
 
 By \V. E. BYERLY, Professor of Mathematics in Harvard University. 
 8vo. 204 pages. Mailing Price, $2.15; Introduction, $2.00. 
 
 This volume is a sequel to the author's treatise on the DitYerential 
 Calculus (see page 134), and, like that, is written as a text-book. 
 The last chapter, however, a Key to the Solution of Differential 
 Equations, may prove of service to working mathematicians. 
 
 H. A. Newton, Prof, of Math., 
 Yale Coll. : \Ve shall use it in my 
 optional class next term. 
 
 Mathematical Visitor : The 
 subject is presented very clearly. It is 
 the first American treatise on the Cal- 
 culus that we have seen which devotes 
 any space to average and probability. 
 
 Schoolmaster, Lcndcn : The 
 merits of this work are as marked as 
 
 those of the Differential Calculus by 
 the same author. 
 
 Zion's Herald : A text-book every 
 way worthy of the venerable University 
 in which the author is an honored 
 teacher. Cambridge in Massachusetts, 
 like Cambridge in England, preserves 
 its reputation for the breadth and strict- 
 ness of its mathematical requisitions, 
 and these form the spinal column of a 
 liberal education.
 
 A Short Table of Integrals. 
 
 To accompany BYE JULY'S INTEGRAL CALCULUS. By B. O. 
 PEIRCE, JR., Instructor in Mathematics, Harvard University. 16 pages. 
 Mailing Price, 10 cts. To be bound with future editions of the Calculus. 
 
 Elements of Quaternions. 
 
 By A. S. HARDY, Ph.D., Professor of Mathematics, Dartmouth College. 
 Crown, 8vo. Cloth. 240 pages. Mailing Price, $2.15; Introduction, 
 
 The chief aim has been to meet the wants of beginners in the 
 class-room. The Elements and Lectures of Sir W. R. Hamilton 
 are mines of wealth, and may be said to contain the suggestion 
 of all that will be done in the way of Quaternion research and 
 application : for this reason, as also on account of their diffuseness 
 of style, they are not suitable for the purposes of elementary instruc- 
 tion. The same may be said of Tail's Quaternions, a work of 
 great originality and comprehensiveness, in style very elegant but 
 very concise, and so beyond the time and needs of the beginner. 
 The Introduction to Quaternions by Kelland contains many exer- 
 cises and examples, of which free use has been made, admirably 
 illustrating the Quaternion spirit and method, but has been found, 
 in the class-room, practically deficient in the explanation of the 
 theory and conceptions which underlie these applications. The 
 object in view has thus been to cover the introductory ground more 
 thoroughly, especially in symbolic transformations, and at the same 
 time to obtain an arrangement better adapted to the methods of 
 instruction common in this country. 
 
 PRESS NOTICES. 
 
 Westminster Review : It is a 
 remarkably clear exposition of the sub- 
 ject. 
 
 The Daily Review, Edinburgh, 
 Scotland : This is an admirable text- 
 book. Prof. Hardy has ably supplied 
 a felt want. The definitions are models 
 of conciseness and perspicuity. 
 
 The Nation : For those who have 
 never studied the subject, this treatise 
 seems to us superior both to the work 
 of Prof. Tail and to the joint treatise by 
 Profs. Tail and Kelland. 
 
 New York Tribune : The Qua- 
 ternion Calculus Is an instrument of 
 mathematical research at once so pow-
 
 162 
 
 erful, flexible, and elegant, so sweeping 
 in its range, and so minutely accurate, 
 that its discovery and development has 
 been rightly estimated as one of the 
 crowning achievements of the century. 
 The time is approaching when all col- 
 leges will insist upon its study as an 
 essential part of the equipment of young 
 men who aspire to be classified among 
 the liberally educated. This book fur- 
 nishes just the elementary instruction 
 on the subject which is needed. 
 
 New York Times : It is especially 
 designed to meet the needs of begin- 
 ners in the science. ... It has a way 
 of putting things which is eminently its 
 own, and which, for clearness and force, 
 is as yet unsurpassed. ... If we may 
 not seek for Quaternions made easy, we 
 certainly need search no longer for 
 Quaternions made plain. 
 
 Van Nostrand Engineering 
 Magazine : To any one who has 
 labored with the very few works ex- 
 tant upon this branch of mathematics, 
 a glance at the opening chapter of 
 Prof. Hardy's work will enforce the 
 conviction that the author is an in- 
 structor of the first order. The book 
 is quite opportune. The subject must 
 
 soon become a necessary one in all 
 the higher institutions, for already are 
 writers of mathematical essays making 
 free use of Quaternions without any 
 preliminary apology. 
 
 Canada School Journal, To- 
 ronto : The author of this treatise has 
 shown a thorough mastery of the Qua- 
 ternion Calculus. 
 
 London Schoolmaster : It is in 
 every way suited to a student who 
 wishes to commence the subject ab 
 initio. One will require but a few 
 hours with this book to learn that this 
 Calculus, with its concise notation, is a 
 most powerful instrument for mathe- 
 matical operations. 
 
 Boston Transcript : A text-book 
 of unquestioned excellence, and one 
 peculiarly fitted for use in American 
 schools and colleges. 
 
 The Western, St. Louis: This 
 work exhibits the scope and power of 
 the new analysis in a very clear and 
 concise form . . . illustrates very finely 
 the important fact that a few simple 
 principles underlie the whole body of 
 mathematical truth. 
 
 FROM COLLEGE PROFESSORS. 
 
 James Mills Peirce, Prof, of 
 Math., Harvard Coll. : I am much 
 pleased with it. It seems to me to 
 supply in a very satisfactory manner 
 the need which has long existed of a 
 clear, concise, well-arranged, and logi- 
 cally-developed introduction to this 
 branch of Mathematics. I think Prof. 
 Hardy has shown excellent judgment 
 in his methods of treatment, and also 
 in limiting himself to the exposition 
 and illustration of the fundamental 
 principles of his subject. It is, as it 
 
 ought to be, simply a preparation for 
 the study of the writings of Hamilton 
 and Tail. I hope the publication o/ 
 this attractive treatise will increase the 
 attention paid in our colleges to the 
 profound, powerful, and fascinating cal- 
 culus of which it treats. 
 
 Charles A. Young. Prof, of 
 Astronomy, Princeton Coll. : I find it 
 by far the most clear and intelligible 
 statement of the matter I have yet 
 seen.
 
 i6 3 
 
 Elements of the Differential and Integral Calculus. 
 
 With Examples and Applications. By J. M. TAYLOR, Professor of 
 Mathematics in Madison University. 8vo. Cloth. 249 pp. Mailing 
 price, $1.95; Introduction price, $i.So. 
 
 The aim of .this treatise is to present simply and concisely the 
 fundamental problems of the Calculus, their solution, and more 
 common applications. Its axiomatic datum is that the change of a 
 variable, when not uniform, may be conceived as becoming uniform 
 at any value of the variable. 
 
 It employs the conception of rates, which affords finite differen- 
 tials, and also the simplest and most natural view of the problem of 
 the Differential Calculus. This problem of finding the relative 
 rates of change of related variables is afterwards reduced to that of 
 finding the fimit of the ratio of their simultaneous increments ; and, 
 in a final chapter, the latter problem is solved by the principles of 
 infinitesimals. 
 
 Many theorems are proved both by the method of rates and that 
 of limits, and thus each is made to throw light upon the other. 
 The chapter on differentiation is followed by one on direct integra- 
 tion and its more important applications. Throughout the work 
 there are numerous practical problems in Geometry and Mechanics, 
 which serve to exhibit the power and use of the science, and to 
 excite and keep alive the interest of the student. 
 
 Judging from the author's experience in teaching the subject, it 
 is believed that this elementary treatise so sets forth and illustrates 
 the highly practical nature of the Calculus, as to awaken a lively 
 interest in many readers to whom a more abstract method of treat- 
 ment would be distasteful. 
 
 Oren Root, Jr., Prof, of Math., 
 Hamilton Coll., N.Y.: In reading the 
 manuscript I was impressed by the 
 clearness of definition and demonstra- 
 tion, the pertinence of illustration, and 
 the happy union of exclusion and con- 
 densation. It seems to me most admir- 
 ably suited for use in college classes. 
 I prove my regard by adopting this as 
 our text-book on the calculus. 
 
 C. M. Charrappin, S.J., St. 
 
 Louis Univ. : I have given the book a 
 thorough examination, and I am satis- 
 fied that it is the best work on the sub- 
 ject I have seen. I mean the best 
 work for what it was intended, a text- 
 book. I would like very much to in- 
 troduce it in the University. 
 (Jan. 12, 1885.)
 
 University of California 
 
 SOUTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY 
 
 405 HIH^ydMe^ufi i Angeles, CA 90024-1388 
 
 tuf n tbif/qater.ial to the library 
 rrfl.was borrowed. 
 
 OCT261993 
 
 RECEIVEC 
 
 SEP 2 8 1993 
 EMS LIBRARY
 
 QA825P35e 
 
 EDUCATION 
 
 LIBRARY 
 
 ULMV: 
 
 '"ORNL.
 
 Unh 
 S