THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES ^^y^i^l S^^^^if^Sf J,C. McRao. 15 ¥ Cd (H M 01 [M c'S NEWHAVEN, CONN, HISTORY iflutlj ©uugrEgatifliial ®|urc|, NE\\^ HAVEN", ITS ORIGIN IN 1852 TILL JANUARY 1, 1865. BY GERARD HALLOCK. CLERK OF SAID CHURCH. NEW HATEN. PRINTED BY TUTTLE, MOREHOUSE AND TAYLOR. 1865. TABLE OF CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. Pagres Preliminary History of South Church, .... 5-18 CHAPTER II. Ministry of Rev. Dr. Stiles, 19-50 CHAPTER III. Ministry of Rev. Mr. Noyes, 51-70 CHAPTER IV. Ministry of Rev. Mr. Carroll, - . . . . 71-10'J (JHAPTER V. 77ie Ex-parte Council, . 103-104 "Result of Council." ---.... 104-111 Reply of South Chureh to do., 111-133 Rejoinder to Reply, 133-140 Remarks on the Rejoinder, 140-16! Strictures on the '^Remarks" by a Member of the Council, 161-162 Reply to the Strictures — Rev. Dr. Button on Female Voting. 163-166 l-lffects of ^he Action of Council. 166-176 CH.\PTER Vr. NfM^' Year's Address (1864) to Rev. Mr. Carroll. - - 177-183 Mr. Carroll's Reply— Rev. Mr. Barrett. - . . 184-185 2012519 IV INDEX. Parting Interview with Rev. Mr. Barrett. - - - 185-187 State and Progress of the Church, ... - 187-204 South Church Finances. 204-206 Resolutions concerning tlie Bell. .... 206-207 CHAPTER VII. Rev. Mr. Carroll's Memorial Sorraon, . - - - 209-257 CATALOGUE. Comprising Pagei Confession of Faith, 1-3 Covenant, 4 Standing Rules, - 5-7 Officers of Church and Society, 9-10 Chronological List of all who are or have been Members of South Churcli. 11-2.3 Alphabetical List of Present Members, .... 25-31 Alphabetical List of Ex-members, 33-41 Chronological List of do.. 43-46 Summarv of Admissions and Dismissions, - - - 47-48 iM^i^ HISTORY OF THE SOUTH CHURCH D CHAPTER 1. PRELIMINARY HISTORY. Prior to the erection of the South Church edifices, in 1851 and 1852, there was no house of worship of any Protestant denomination, in the south-western section of the city. The nearest Protestant church, at the date mentioned, was that in College street, dis- tant, by the course of the roads, about three-quarters of a mile from the site of the South Church. For two or three years, a few individuals had been moot- ing- the question, whether it was not i^ossible to provide a place of worship for this destitute section, too many of whose inhabitants excused themselves from attend- ing public worship on account of distance, poverty, and other circumstances, which served to quiet their con- sciences and keep them aloof from the means of grace. True, there was a small Sabbath School held in the Mount Pleasant School-house a part of the time, and occasionally some clergyman from town, or theological student, would come over and hold a meeting for prayer, or preach a sermon. The few pious people 1 b PRELIMINARY HISTORY. who resided in the vicinity, encouraged these efforts, and did what they could to promote them. But they were poor, as well as few in number, and could really do nothing, or next to nothing, towards the erection of a house of worship). Some individuals who be- longed to churches in town, were too much attached to them to be willing to engage in any new enterprise looking to a disruption of existing relations. Thus, in one way or another, the projectors of the South Church enterprise met with discouragement at every step. The first idea was, to have a Mission Chapel, erected by subscription, and free to all. But on this basis there would be no revenue, and a con- stant outlay would be required to support the minis- ter and defray other necessary expenses. Next, a small church edifice was contemplated, in which the slips should be rented, and thus the expense of supporting the establishment be in part defrayed. But this plan was found to be no more acceptable than the other. A personal application to all those persons in the vicinity who were deemed most likely 40 be able and willing to aid the enterprise, produced but one subscription, ($50,) and an offer on the part of a farmer to assist in digging the cellar.* These * It sliould, perl\aps, be mentioned that a lady offered to give a site for tiie cliurch, not far from the present location, on condition tliat the edifice to be erected on it, should be used forever as a Congrega- tional church. This offer, generous as it was in some respectj", tho parties interested felt obliged to decline, as they could not nm the risk of losing their whole investment, in case the church enterprise, which was altogether an experinitrnt. should not succeed. PRELIMINARY HISTORY, 7 subscrii^tions were afterwards respectfully declined, and the plan was adojited which was finally carried into effect. It was simply this, — for the projectors of the undertaking to take the work into their own hands, do it at their own expense, and hold the prop- erty in their own right, until such time as the cliurch and society should he able to redeem it. But then the question arose, how large a building should be erected, — whether of wood, or brick, or stone, — whether only large enough to accommodate such of the existing population as might be expected to attend, or having reference also to prospective wants. If we built a small church, we should be likely to liave a small minister, small congregations, and a small income. But if we should be prospered be- yond our hopes, then would come the necessity of a larger house, and we should have to lengthen it, or in some way add to its dimensions. This would vio- late its architectural proportions, and otherwise de- fomi it, — at the same time increasing the expense. Suffice it to say, the result of our deliberations was, to build a church of the first class, whether as to dimensions, materials, architectural beauty, or other basis of comparison ; one that should do honor, not only to the neighborhood, but to the city ; one that should be suited to the wants of the community half a century hence. This conclusion was aided and encouraged by the eminent architect, Sidney M. Stone, to whom we applied for a phin, and who sub- sequently took the contract for building the church, 8 PRELIMINAKY HISTORY. and became a proj^rietor to the extent of $1,000. The contract was dated January 25, 1851, and called for the completion of the building by the first of March in the following year. With the exception of a lot of land worth $2,000, all the payments were to be made, and were made, in cash, as the work pro- ceeded. A very eligible site had been purchased one week previous, for $1,015, of Mrs. Hannah Tuttle and her daughters Lucy and Elizabeth, at the corner of Columbus and Liberty streets, described in their deed as containing " ninety square rods, more or less." It is bounded Northerly 115 feet 6 inches by Colum- bus street. Easterly 206 feetby Liberty street. South- erly 115 feet 8 inches. Westerly 203 feet 9 inches. The walls of the church above ground are of Port- land (Connecticut Eiver) stone, 64 feet front and rear, by 90 feet from outside to outside, and 34 feet high from top of water-table to line of eaves. Ke- cess for pulpit in rear end of the church, 7 feet by 22, and 26 feet six inches high from top of water- table to line of eaves. Tower 21 feet by 21, and 87 feet high from top of water-table to top of stone- work. From the surface of the ground to the top of battlement, 98 feet 6 inches. As the tower pro- jects 10 feet from the main building, the entire length of the structure is 107 feet. The audience room is 75 feet by 59 feet 8 inches in the clear, exclusive of the recess for puljiit, and organ-loft in front. Tlie foundation walls of the tower are six feet thick at bottom, and four fe-ut at top. Walls PRELIMINARY HISTORY. 9 of tower, above the foundation walls, 2 feet 3 inches thick 35 feet upward, then 2 feet thick 27 feet up- ward to hell-deck, then 1 foot and 6 inches thick 25 feet upward to top of stone- work. The foundation walls of the building proper are 3 feet G inches thick at bottom, and 2 feet 10 inches at top ; the side and front walls 2 feet thick from top of foundation walls to the height of two feet above the tops of the win- dows ; then 1 foot 9 inches thick to eaves. The rear wall, including recess, 1 foot G inches thick. All the interstices in the walls as they were being Ijuilt, were tilled with soft mortar or cement. The mason-work was let out by the contractor to Messrs. Perkins & Hine ; the wood-work to Nicholas Countryman. The whole was done to the entire satisfaction of the parties interested, and unless destroyed by fire or some other extraordinary visitation, the building will stand for ages. Scarcely had the main edifice been opened for pub- lic worship, on the last Sabbath in June, 1852, when there was found to be an urgent necessity for smaller rooms, suitable for conference and prayer meetings, and for the Sabbath School, which had been trans- ferred to this church from the Mount Pleasant school- house. Accordingly the Chapel, fronting on Lib- erty street, directly in the rear of the Church, was projected and built by day's work, 57 feet by 35, from outside to outside, in the same style and of the same kind of material as the main edifice. Both buildings are rigidly plain, but the eftect is, to give 1- 10 PRELIMINARY HISTORY. them an air of dignity and permanence, rather than cheapness ; to please the eye with beautiful propor- tions and a simplicity that never tires, rather than tickle it with ornament for a time, to be disgusted in the end. A single enclosure embraces both build- ins:s, — the fence on both streets being a substantial cast-iron railing, resting upon, or rather entered into, a massive dressed-stone coping, of the same material as the walls of the buildings. The entire lower floor of the Chapel, excej)t the vestibule, is fitted up as an "Audience Room, being provided with a pulpit and slips, and will comfortably seat from 250 to 300 per- sons. The upper story is occupied chiefly as the ''Ladies' Room" ; being neatly carpeted, and provi- ded with seventy or eighty chairs, settees, work- tables, tea-tables, sideboards, crockery, and other apparatus, for the convenience of the Sewing Society and other meetings. In this " large upper-room fur- nished," the church prayer meetings are held. Over the vestibule is the Pastor's study, carpeted and fur- nished in an appropriate manner. The Sabbath School Library, comprising about 500 well-selected volumes, is kejDt in a little room set oif from the ves- tibule. A Melodeon is used in common by the Sab- bath School and other meetings in the Chapel and Ladies' Room. The following schedule shows the cost of the South Church property, both real and personal, distinguish- ing as far as practicable, between the Church and the Chapel : — PKELIMINARY HISTORY, 11 SOUTH CHURCH.— Main Edifice. Coat of Lot, - Contract with Sidney M. Stono, for main ediOce, Variations and extras, .... Richard Carse, windows for cluu'ch, complete, Bell, (2,504 lbs.) and rigging, from Holbrook's Fonndry, East Med way, Mass., Gas pipes, meter, itc., .... Grading, turfing, trees and vines, about tlie cliurcli, ^ Paving in front of church, . . . , Carpets for church, and putting down, — Marble & Foste Church furniture, — Blair's bill, - Psalm books and Music books for church, Mats, &c., for church, — Walker's bill. Curtains for pnlpit windows, — Doolittle's bill, - Organ, from Erbea's Factory, New York, Carting do., and trinnnings for pulpit. Countryman's bill for out-buildings, benclies, and sundries about church, Communion Service, and Baptismal Yase, Cloths for do., ..... Wm. M. Hubbard, for work, A:c. at church, before occupancy. Iron Railing Company's biU for fences, &c.. Painting iron fences, — Andrews' bill, Countryman's bill for vestibule, Total cost of church edifice and furniture complete. including ground, - - . $27,877 55 SOUTH CHURCH CHAPEL. Sidney M. stone's bill for Chapel, . . . $i;,07(J ;;l Yentilators for do., - - . . . 1100 Carting stone for do.,— Hull .t "Wallace's bill. - . ].';2 00 stones left after building clmrcli,— boudit of Perkins i Iline, 2 1 00 Carse, for Chapel window s, .... 04;) qq Carpets for lecture room cf Chapel,- Marble c^- Foster, 1 4;) 79 $ 1,015 00 10,000 00 235 Hi G54 00 68G 00 :j8 70 195 37 o5 7(; G:i2 38 1,270 17 o'l G3 22 81 88 50 2,500 00 32 09 ■ies 332 06 75 00 18 50 cy, 2 1 23 018 38 25 00 48 81 12 PRELIMINARY HISTORY. Mats, &c. for Chapel, — "Walker, - - - 5 71 Blair's bill for suudries in furnishing Chapel and Pastor's Study, 230 00 do. do. furniture for Ladies' Room, - - 190 00 Side-board for do. do. Bowditch, - 7 00 Carpets for do. do. Marble & Foster, - 109 7. "J Oil cloth for do. do. P'airnian, - 4 13 Stove, &c. do. do. Cannon, - - 18 27 Crockery and tea \irn for do. do. Minor, - - 23 51 Gas exte-sion to Chapel, - - - - 46 50 Bible and 127 Hymn Books, (red covers,) for Chapel, - 44 45 Six missionary maps for do. .... '_>8 00 Total cost of chapel and furniture complete, church, &.C.. as above,* - $7,346 40 27,877 55 Church and Chapel, including ground.f Of whicli was paid by Thomas R. Trowbridge and Brothers, .... $3,500 00 By Sidey M. Stone, .... 1,00000 By Amos Smith, 1,000 00 S35.223 95 5,500 00 By Gerard Hallock, $29,723 95: who, accordingly, on the 23cl of April, 1853, con- veyed to Thomas R. Trowbridge, for the latter and his brothers, Henry and Ezekicl, one undivided tenth of all the property aforesaid, and to Sidney M. Stone * This distinction in the cost of Church and Chapel is not strictly accurate, as some of the bills are charged to the Church which belong, in part, to the Chapel, and vice versa. For instance, the iron railing is all charged to the Church, while the stone coping on which it rests, is all charged to the Chapel. So, likewise, the liorse-sheds and other out-buildings are all charged to the Chiu-ch, while all the side-walk pavement on Liberty street Is charged to the Chapel. On (ho whole, the variations from exactness about balance each other. f Many small items, amounting to several hundred dollars in tho aggregate, were paid by the principal proprietor, wilhoul bcin.;- inclu- ded in lhi.« account. PRELIMINARY HISTORY. 13 and Amos Smith, each an undivided thirty-fifth. In 1855 he re-purchased the shares of Messrs. Stone and Smith, and on the 20th October, 1864, those of the Messrs. Trowbridge ; tlms becoming sole proprie- tor. As soon as a church was organized. No-, ember 8, 1852, the buildings were placed at its disposal, for use and occupancy, at the nominal rent of a barley- corn a year, and have continued in its possession, or in that of the church and society, to the present time, at the same nominal rent, — the principal proprietor keeping the property insured at his own expense for about $30,000, and doing most of the repairs. As lie is the only one of the original proprietors who is now connected with the church and society, and as he is identified with them in all tlieir symjjathies and interests, they Jiave every reason to be satisfied with the present state of things, until they shall be dis- posed to take the property into their own hands, and sustain tj^e establishment after the usual manner of such organizations. Whenever that time shall come, it is fair to presume that they will find him ready to meet their wishes on satisfactory terms. It may not be generally known that the Soutli Church was erected with a view to the occupancy of its jiulpit by Rev. E. N. Sawtell, now seamen's chaplain at the port of Havre, France. He had pre- viously occupied the last named position for seven years, — had ofiiciated for about an equal period as pastor of a Presbyterian Church in Louisville, Ky., and for several years had been one of the Secretaries 14 PRELIMINARY HISTORY. of a Society in New York, now known as the Amer- ican and Foreign Christian Union. In every sphere in which he had been called to act, he had acquitted himself with distinguished ability ; and being now at the zenith of his intellectual powers, with a warm, Christian heart, and rare speaking talents, — withal lony-in": to engage again in his Master's service as a preacher and pastor, — it was a great disappointment to those of us who knew his worth, to find ourselves cut off from all prospect of consummating the pro- posed arrangement ; and equally so to himself, as will be seen by the following extracts from his letters : "Cleveland, December 30, 1851. "For several weeks it has been in my heart to write you fully and frankly on the precarious state of my health, or rather, the almost entire loss of my speaking powers. * * You are aware, I think, that an attack of bilious fever which I had in New York last February, was succeeded by an inflammation of the throat, which troubled me more or less through the summer. It however gave me but little anxie- ty, as I thought time and care would eradicate the com- plaint. In this I have been mistaken. On the return of cold, frosty weather, it seized my throat with increased vir- ulence ; and since leaving New York, 1 have not been able to preach at all. Even in conducting family worship, or reading an article aloud in a newspa[)er, my voice has so ut- terly failed me, that I could finish it only in a whisper. I have availed myself of the best medical advice, but to very little purpose; physicians give me but little encouragement. " Now, my dear sir, what shall be done 1 The Lord's hand is evidently in tliis matter, and while it is our duty to bow submissively to His will, it is eciually our duty to in- (piire what lie will have us to do. * * * (>, what a world of uncertainties and disappointments ! How easy for PRELIMINAUy HISTORY. 15 flic Lord to thwart all our plans ! It does indeed require much grace to say at all times and under all circumstances, ' Tlie will of the Lord be done.' Lord, increase our faith. * * * Mrs. Sawtell has often felt that the Lord might tear me away from what she sometimes feared was my idol. Though not conscious of idolatry, I am aware that my soul has been wrapped up in that one object. But the Lord can do without me. That lie intends to have a church there, I have not the least shadow of doubt, though my voice may never be heard in that pulpit. May God bleys you and yours, and the enterprise you have so much at heart." " Cleveland, Feb. 18, 1852. " Mtssrs. JIallock, Trotvhridge, Smith, Stone, and others. "Dear Sirs: — The recent intelligence which I have received of the near completion of your church edifice, has filled my heart with mingled emotions of joy and grief; of joy, that the Lord has enabled you to do so much ; grief, at the prospect of my doing so little, or, perhaps as I ought rather to say, nfmf/ doing nothing, in advancing that noble enterprise in which you are engaged. I have before in- timated to some of my friends, my fears on this subject, owing to the precarious state of my voice. But hoping at the return of each day, that some favorable change or sym{itoms might manifest themselves, and unwilling to be convinced that I was to have no part nor lot in that mat- ter, I have deferred writing to you jointly, until I dare de- fer no longer. I think it due to you all, as well as to my- self, to make known to you the whole truth in this matter, and keep nothing back, that is in the least calculated to shed light upon your path and mine. During the whole winter I have been a great sufferer, with an inflammation of the throat, accompanied with an entire exhaustion or pros- tration of my speaking powers. I have recently made two attempts to speak in public, in both of which I failed, and had to cut short my remarks, and from the effects of which I have not yet recovered. One was simply a short address, at the anniversary of the Society for National Popular Ed- ucation ; and although I yielded reluctantly to the solicita- tions of riovernor Slade to make this address, I finallv did 16 PRELIMINARY HISTORY. it rather as au experiment, to see what effect it would pro- duce upon my throat, that it uiiglit shed light upon my future path, and enable you tlie better to judge whether it would be prudent and wise for me to enter upon that invi- ting and important field of labor which you have, at so much expense, opened before me. To my own mind, the testimony furnished by this experiment, has been most painfully conclusive. I did not spend over an hour in jot- ting down the few thoughts I offered on that occasion, and yet, w^hen I entered the church, my whole frame was agi- tated, my nerves unstrung, ray throat inflamed and almost closed up, and when I returned home, I had a high fever, and for three days was confined to the house. There seems to be a connection, a strange sympathy, between my throat and all mental efforts. The least excitement only enhances tlie disease ; and as it is impossible for me to speak in pub- lic, and much less to preach the Gospel, without mental effort, and strongly excited feelings, I can see but little hope for me, — and I write this with a feeling heart and weeping eyes. " I have earnestly prayed, that if it be for the glory of God, this cup of disappointment might pass from me. 'Yet, not my will, but Thine, Lord, be done,' must, and I trust ever will be, the language of my heart. I have often pictured to myself the happiness I should experience in once more returning to the duties of a pastoral life, after the shifting scenes through which I have passed, and of having my family located in such a place as New Haven, and of closing my ministerial labors in what would seem to be as near an earthly paradise as any thing I could imagine this Hide of Heaven; and it may be that my Heavenly Father has seen some lurking sin in these anticipations, that needs to be eradicated, ere I can ' be made meet for the inheritance of the children of light.' Or, it may be, that He sees some other one that could better fill that place, and that He has other work for me to do. At any rate, we cannot, we nmst not, shut our eyes to the clear in- dications of His providence, however tiiey may thwart our ])urposes or cross our inclinations. I need not say, that all that, human skill can do or devise, has been done in my case PKELIMINARY HISTORY, 17 My physicians give 1)iit little encouragement of my ever being able to preach nuich more. ****** "And now, my clear friends, may that God, ' whose path is in the deep, — whose ways are past finding out,' guide you, and Mess yju abundantly in your noble work, and send you a man after ' His own heart,' And should it please Him to restore me, to health, and permit us to labor to- gether, we will rejoice. If not, we will liow meekly at His feet, and say, ' Let the will of the Lord be done.' " Your sincere friend and brother in Christ, E. N". Sawtell." " Cleveland, Feb. 21, 1852. * * "So long have I been in the habit of contempla- ting that church as my own child, beloved and longed for, that now, to give it up, seems at times like the plucking out of a riglit eye. But, my dear friend, let our daily prayer be, that our mutual disappointment may be mutu- ally sanctified to us, — and teach us more and more our de- pendence on God, and the uncertainty of all human calcu- lations. The Lord docth all things well. ' How unsearch- able are His judgments, and His ways past finding out.' ♦ * * And now, my dear brother, I commend you to God, and to the word of His grace ; praying that His grace may be suflficieut for you, and for all who are labor- ing with you; and that God may, in His own good time, send you a man after His own heart, to preacli faithfully the Gospel of His dear Son, and break unto you the bread of life." " Cleveland, April 5, 1852. " Your kind letter, announcing an invitation to Rev. Dr. Stiles to take my place in the new Church, has been duly received, with heart-felt gratitude to God for directing your minds to that man of God, — a man of all others in^ the large circle of my acquaintance I should prefer. i\Iy sin- cere hope and earnest prayer is, that God will send him to you, and o])en for him a wide door of usefulness. I can- not doubt but a blessing, — a rich harvest is before him, if he enter that field. He is a good man and true ; fervent, 9 18 PRELIMINARY HISTORY. eloquent, full of holy fire and apostolic zeal, — simple as a child, — an eye single, a heart warm, and a wliole body full of light. 0, should I live to see him settled among you, I should feel that the Lord's hand, which is so heavily laid on me, had by it wrought the greater mercies for you, and for that dear infant church." CHAPTEK II. MINISTRY OF DR. STILES. At the time our apj)lication was made to Rev. Dr. Stiles, he was engaged in the service of the Ameri- can Bible Society, as Secretary for the South ; spend- ing most of his time in the Southern States, in furtherance of the objects of that institution. Our application took him by surprise, and was successful only because, when we had ascertained his j)urpose never again to accept a permanent pastorship, we modified our overture accordingly. In a letter dated Savannah, April 1, 1852, he wrote as follows : — "While I am comforted that good brethren should invite me to any field in my Master's vineyard, and especially so important a one, I must respond, — if the intent of your communication is to call me to officiate as the permanent minister of the church, I must, as at present advised, answer respectfully, but decidedly in the negative. From consti- tutional structure rather than holy principle, I habitually over-work. Youthful vigor and inordinate effort may agree for a time, but years and over-work have no congeniality. This has long been my experience. * * * I think I may say that no agency in the Kingdom could content me for a moment, if it denied me the opportunity of so preaching the Gospel as to promise, under God, the conversion of sin- ners. For this reason, why should I wish to exchange my present occupation for a regular jiastorship \ I think I have seen many, many conversions this winter; thirty or forty in one place, and occasional instances all along down to my 20 MINISTRY OF DR. STILES. very last preachings ; and my conviction is, not to the detri- ment, but rather to the advantage, of my official work. You understand from this extended sketch, what my response is to any application to accept the permanent pastorate of a church. * * * Had the call been to a tcmporarn service, (and such the early language of your letter seemed to indi- cate, when you said, ' to dedicate this church or assist in dedicating it, and then go on preaching in it until such time as you may see fit to organize a church,')" — had such been the nature of the call. Dr. JStiles leaves it to be inferred that his difficulty on this head would have been obviated. He adds, " Now my brother, let me say in conclusion, I honor you and your three coadjutors in my heart. You are doing a good work. Surely the Lord will in due time point out His man for your church. I need not say that I will take a special interest in your enterprise,— shall delight in its pros- perity — shall love at any time to speak the Master's mes- sages to your people, — and do now pray, The Lord be with you." Macon, Geo., April 14, 1852. * * * "The Lord lead us, in the matter of the church, — command my services if He so directs, — forbid my connex- ion with you if this is His will." " P. S. I have this moment received your last. God bless my dear brother Sawtell. My friends everywhere think too much of me." Not to extend these extracts, suffice it to say, that on reading them, our application was so modified as only to invite Dr. Stiles to come and dedicate the church, and then to remain Avith us so long as his sense of duty, under all tlie ch-cumstances, as seen by himself, should seem to require. The reader will bear in mind that there was at this time no church organ- ization, — much less an ecclesiastical society. What- ever arrangements were to be made for the supply of the pulpit, must be made by the proprietors, for there MINISTRY OF DR. STILES. 21 was no one else to do it. Well, Dr. 8tiles at length came. Mr. Sawtell also came. The dedication had been fixed for the last Sabbath in June, 1852, and these good men, as if moved by an invisible attrac- tion, were here the day previous, and stopped at the house of one of the proprietors, where they were thrice welcome. The new church and its ijrosi)ective dedication and promise of usefulness, were the absorb- ing tlieme of their conversation and prayers. On the (Saturday) evening previous to the dedication, Mr. Amos Smith called to see them, and nearly the whole evening was spent in fervent addresses to the Throne of Grrace, — each of the three brethren officiating in turn, — or in serious conversation suggested by the occasion which had brought them together. It was an evening long to be remembered ; for if ever a church was thoroughly and honestly dedicated to God in advance, it was then and there, in that im- promptu meeting of four persons. They prayed that God would own and bless that sanctuary from its very beginning ; that his Holy Spirit might ever dwell in it and overshadow it ; that the faithful Gospel might ever be faithfully preached there, and tlessed to the conviction, conversion, and salvation of a multitude of souls. There Avas no formality about the exercises, — no effort, — nothing pre-concerted ; it was the spontaneous outtiow and overflow of Chris- tian hearts, united in one object, and moved by a heavenly influence. To these prayers, and the an- 0* 22 MINISTRY OF DR. STILES. swer to them, Dr. Stiles alludes in one of the ex- tracts quoted below. The first sermon ever preached in the South Church was by Rev. Dr. Stiles, on Sabbath mor- ning, June 27, 1852, from the text, " Why will ye die ?" It was a deeply impressive discourse, and was preached to a very large audience. Not only the fame of the preacher, but the novelty of the occa- sion, drew together a crowd of hearers. In the after- noon the pulpit was occupied by some other clergy- man. In the evening. Dr. Stiles j)reaclied the Dedi- cation sermon, from the text, " I am not ashamed of the Gospel of Christ." He now laid out his full strength, stimulated alike by the greatness of his theme, and by the sea of up-turned faces which he saw before him. Every slip and aisle, every gallery and entry, every standing-place, and even the pulpit stairs of that spacious edifice, were filled to overflow- ing, and hundreds went away, from the impossibility of gaining admittance. Eev. Mr. Sawtcll was pres- ent to enjoy the scene, but was unable to take any prominent part in the exercises. Several persons, who afterward obtained joy and peace in believing, date their first religious impressions from the solem- nities of that day. One man in i;)articular, then be- tween 45 and 50 years of age, who had lived a very wicked life and gloried in his wickedness, was melted down under convictions of the truth, and never found rest until he found it in Christ. He has ever since Avitnessed a good confession, — always ready to lift uj> MINISTRY OB' DR. STILES. 23 his voice in prayer or praise, — to do or to suffer for liis Divine Master, — and is now an officer, as well as a most efficient member, of the South Cburcli. Lest it should be thought that this statement is too high- ly colored, we here present his own account of the '•' great change" which took place in his views and feelings, as published in a little Tract, not very long after the date of his conversion. In that Tract he says,— " From early boyhood, say for the last thirty six years of my life, I was a disbeliever in the Bible, the day of judg- ment, and even in the existence of God himself. I saw a controlling power all aroimd me, but never connected it with a divine person. My creed looked to this world as the end of all things, and taught me, if happiness was to be found at all, it must be reached in thi.s life. The fact is, at the age of thirteen years I discarded all the influence of ray pious parents and friends, and claimed the right to control my own acts. "As I advanced in life I denounced the clergy, closed my ears to all Christian advice, and my eyes to all the provi- dences of God. I seldom entered a church. My Sabbaths were desecrated by devotion to boating, fishing, hunting, nay, to all sorts of amusements, which I took great pleasure in boldly prosecuting before the eyes of the i)ublic. I ridiculed and even abused those who were disposed to ob- serve the Sabbath. I have a vivid recollection of the pre- vailing state of my mind when I heard the Sabbath bells, and looked upon the multitudes repairing to the house of God. I said in my heart, 'You fools, I never saw God, and you never did ; why not act as sensible beings, and enjoy yourselves as i do?' In a word, I determined 'to sail the ship myself,' and for thirty-six years I did so. Was I happy 1 No ; all was dark and gloomy in the prospect. Death and the grave were constantly before me, and though in perfect health, yet when tliinking of the future 1 was always disturbed. 24 MINISTRY OF PR. STILES. " My views and feelings are now greatly changed. And wliy ? I gave a moment's honest attention to the salvation of my soul, and by the grace of God I am now happy. Dear fellow-sinner, whether you admit your accountal)ility or not, if you will open your eyes and ears, and lift up your heart to God for mercy and salvation through Jesus Christ, you can secure that same change, and be happy too. " I was induced to attend the dedication of a church in the place where I lived. The preacher was earnest and warm in his aj^peal to the consciences of the audience. I was a close listener to his words. Truth was permitted for the first time to light up my dark mind. The" Spirit of God became an inmate of my heart. From a listener I became an inquirer. In due time the great truths of the gospel opened upon my agonized soul. I saw my sins and my ruin. The anguish of my spirit was awful in the extreme. I was actually on the very borders of despair. None but God knows the strugglings and sufferings of that hour, or, blessed be His name, the peace and comfort which I now enjoy. I can tell you of my present hai)py faith, and of the contrast between the hope of the unrepeiiting sinner and that blessed hope which by the grace of God now cheers my soul. I can tell you that the future now looks bright; that there is now no sting in death, no victory in the grave, no bliss in ignorance. Open your eyes and ears and heart, and God will give you the Holy Spirit, and with it a bless- ing so great that your soul cannot contain it." This is a good beginning, it may bo said ; but did he hold out ? — did his religion last ? His old com- panions in sin, when they heard that he had been converted, predicted that in six months lie would bo as bad as ever. If he should not, they would be compelled (they said) to believe there was something in religion. Well, it is now twelve years since his conversion, and where does ho stand ? Tlie follow- ing extracts will sliow. 'IMicy arc taken from letters MINISTRY OF DR. STILES. 25 which, on each anniversary of his spiritual Lirth, he lias been in the habit of addressing to a iriend Avho took a part in the erection of the South Church buildings. New Haven, Nov. 23, 1861. " Nine j'ears ago, by the grace of God, I entered upon a new life, with strong promises that as the previous years of my existence had been a failure, the years to come should be to the glory of God, and the training of my soul to enjoy His presence hereafter. Every re turning aimiversary reminds me how poorly I have kept that promise, and how little I liave done for Christ since it was made. I delight to see the return of this day and hour, because ray heart goes out in gratitude, full to overflowing, towards God, that lie then gave me such strong assurances of His love and favor, thus placing within me a Hope which has thus far been an anchor to my soul at all times. Yet while I am made happy under these assurances, I find one draw-back ; and I ask, what have I done for Christ in return for his boundless love ) to me. I however still look up, and apply the only remedy which can carry me safely through. I have never for a moment doubted the beginning of a work of regeneration in my heart ; and while the occurrences of nine years ago are so vividly before me, I never can. I am reminded of the faithfulness of our mutual friend, Dr. Stiles, who pleaded with and for me, and how he threw his whole heart into the work of kindling and fanning the faint glimmering light of hope in my soul. O how faithfully and perseveringly '>'cach more than once on a Sabbath ; besides which he would give an extempore address in the evening. But as yet the MINISTRY OF DR. STILES. 31 Chapel was not completed, and the evening services, when there was not preaching in the church, were held at private houses, in some of which the voice of praye»- and praise had never been heard before. There were also more or less meetings during the week ; all of which were well attended, and many of them crowded. The Spirit of God was manifestly present. Those were happy seasons, as many who read these pages can testify, from their own recollection and ex- perience. We remarked above, that Dr. Stiles did not engage to preach more than once on a Sabbath. But, in point of fact, he generally did preach twice at this period of his ministry, as will be seen from the record of texts just quoted. His sermons, too, were gene- rally long, occupying about an hour in their delivery, and sometimes more. Although not written out, they were well studied ; and a j)^ge or two of manuscript, in addition to his mental resources, was all that he was accustomed to rely on, for the re-production of the most complicated processes of reasoning, often divided into heads and sub-heads, to an extent that would bewilder any but the most attentive hearers. To this argumentative character of his preaching and to his close analysis of subjects, is attributable the fact, which we believe is undeniable, that his discour- ses were more highly appreciated, and more efiective for good, in the case of persons of vigorous minds and mature judgment, than among the yoiing, or unedu- cated adults. We here speak of his discourses gene- 32 MINISTRY OF DR. STILES. rally in tlie South Church. That he was able to adapt his preaching to the humblest capacities, is shown hy his amazing popularity and success among the negroes in the low country of Georgia, where he labored for a considerable period between the date of his own conversion and his going to Andover Theo- logical Seminary, When the negroes learned that he was about to leave them, they begged him not to go, manifesting toward him much the same feeling as the Ephesiau elders did towards Paul, when they "fell on his neck and kissed him ; sorrowing most of all for the words which he spake, that they should see his face no more." As, however, the Ephesian elders ac- companied Paul to the ship which was to take him from them forever, so the negroes collected by hun- dreds at the landing from which their spiritual teacher was about to depart, to hear his last words and re- ceive his benediction. He accordingly addressed them from the boat, telling them that he was a new axe which had never been ground. His edge was thick, and he had to pound away a long time before he could batter down even a small pine. He was going away to get sharpened ; after which he hoped he should be able to cut down more trees in one day than he now could in a week. Carrying out this illustration, so familiar to the negroes, in such a manner as few other men could, they were convinced that it was best for him to go, and shouted " Go, massa, and de Lor be wid you," or to that effect. This is the merest outline of a most thrilling description of the scene, as related MINISTRY OF DR. STILES. 33 by Dr. Stiles, ten or twelve years ago, in the presence of the writer. And here we may be permitted to copy, briefly, from " Sketches of Western Men," as published in the N. Y. Evangelist of Feb. 7, 1856. Speaking of Dr. Stiles, the writer says : — " lu the Winter of 1842, it was my good fortune to hear this gentknnan in Oxford, Ohio, several successive evenings and on the Sabbath. * * * He was at this time in the prime of a vigorous manhood, and his bearing was solemn without ailectation and marked by a noble manliness. He seemed to feel 'how awful is this place !' and his whole de- meanor betokened his sense of the responsibility of one who preaches the Gospel. His prayers, in their wrestling, pleading fervency, exceeded anything I had ever heard. There was no vaunt or cant in them, but they were of that style we see in Abraham's intercession for Lot. His tones of voice were reverent but earnest, and he literally * filled his mouth with arguments,' as he approached the mercy seat, I have never seen any flagging of interest as he en- gaged in prayer. I have heard him in revivals, at com- munion season, in prayer meetings, once on the Mayflower on Lake Erie, with a little swearing French Catholic priest just opposite, and yet in all places his prayers have been so reverent, fervent, scriptural, and pertinent, that I put them down in my own inind as models. " But in Oxford 1 heard him preacli as well as pray, and some of those discourses are as vivid in memory as if utter- ed yesterday. This is specially the case with two ser- mons ; the one on the words, ' For there is one God and one Mediator between God and maii, the man Christ Jesus,' &c., (1 Tim. ii. 5, 6,) and the other on the expression of Pharaoh to j\Ioses, ' To-morrow.' In these sermons were evidences of intense mental effort, and prodigious grasp of his subject. The analysis of the sin of procrastination, in the latter discourse, was exceedingly fine, and the illustra- tions admirable. Such an impression did this discourse make on my memory, that, on hearing it some years aftei'- 3* 34 MINISTRY OF DK. STILES, wards, a secon 1 time, at the East, I could anticipate his arguments and illustrations, wilhout the least abatement of interest. "Occasionally he illustrated particular points, either by anecdotes or comparisons, which were always in good taste, and told on liis audience with prodigious power. Thus, I remember, he illustrated the necessity of a sinner's casting himself loose from every refuge, on the mercy of Christ, by the sou of a stern sea captain. One day, when the ship was at anchor, the boy had climbed to the very top of a mast, and had lifted himself up so that he stood on the mast's top, on a place scarcely large enough for his feet, with nothing above him to cling to. To attempt to stoop, in order to catch something below, would be to lose his bal- ance and fall to the deck. A cry of alarm ran through the ship as his perilous situation was perceived by the sailors. The father, coming from his cabin, saw tliat his son had no chance of life but to spring from that dizzy height hito the water ; and seizing his rifle with one hand, and tlie speaking trumpet in the other, standing where the boy could sec him, he cried to him in piercing tones of command, 'Jump into the water, or I will shoot you!' For a moment the boy seemed wavering. Every eye was fixed on him with ago- nized intensity. The delay in obeying that stern voice was but momentary, and the boy sprang into the air. As ho reached the water, several sailors sprang in and brought him in safety to the deck. "This is a very meagre outline of a most thrilling illus- tration. The language, and tone, and nuumer, were highly dramatic, but perfectly natural, and the imagination was so stimulated, that it reproduced the scene, until it seemed an actuality, and not a narrative. 80 powerfully wrought up was the whole scene as to put the hearer into an excitement really painful ; and yet the anecdote was not suiTered to dis- tract the mind from the point in hand, for instantly the preacher began to describe the danger of the impenitent sinner, with overpowering earnestness, and \mut to Christ as the only possible salvation. The eflect here produced was a triumph of eloquence, at least so far as to kindle the emotions of an audience in a very high degree. * • • MINISTRY OF DR. STILES, 35 " These illustrations formed but a small part of his dis- courses, and were always such as to administer to the great end aimed at. They were not introduced, as by some inferior men, to relieve the stupidity of a sermon, and to cover up grievous deficiencies in argument and substance, by some captivating narrative. I'he illustration was itself calcu- lated to impress some valuable thought, to point an argu- ment, or ren'er some truth overpowering. It has been my good fortune to hear j\Ir. Stiles many times since, but the impressions made by those discourses in Oxford have never been modified; and I can easily imagine the power of such a preacher in his early manhood, when addressing vast au- diences, such as in revival seasons waited on his ministry in Georgia and Kentucky. He had all the elements of power for a southern audience. He was a most manly man in the pulpit, and in all the social relations of father, broth- er, friend and pastor; his piety was unquestioned, his pray- ers not merely ai)i)ropriate but subduing, his emotions of the warmest and most generous character, his zeal apos- tolic, his mind logical and analytical, his imagination bold, and his view of his business as a preacher such as Paul had, 'woe is me if I preach not the gospel !" Withal, he had a perfect freedom from all the trammels of manuscript, and at times, when in the full exercise of his gifts, seemed almost choked with the burning words which struggled for utterance." We have copied the above as a truthful description of Dr. Stiles' preaching and praying, from a source less likely to be suspected of partiality than the pres- ent writer ; who nevertheless may say, as he deeply feels, that %vhocver has had the opportunity of listen- ing to such a preacher, not only on one occasion, but for some years, has incurred a weight of responsibil- ity which it is not easy to estimate. But if some were unprolited and unblessed by his ministrations, through prejudice or other causes, many received the 36 MINISTRY OF DR. STILES. good seed into their hearts, — ^believed, and were saved. Others, who were ah'eady church-members, were attracted to and around him, and on the evening of November 8, 1852, twenty-nine of them, most or all of whom resided in the south-western portion of the city, were organized into a Christian church, in con- nection with his ministry. [For names, see Cata- logue at the close of this volume.] They had previ- ously appended their signatures to the following declaration : — " We, the undfisigncd, having considered the increasing population of this section of the city, and its inconvenient distance from places of public worship, and having felt the consequent importance of Christian privileges in the midst of us, and being providentially provided with a sanctuary for the service of God ; looking up to God for holy motive in our solemn work, aud for His gracious blessing upon it, with a view to the constitution of a Christian church, — do hereby subscribe the above as our Confession of Faith and Church Covenant." These documents are published in connection with the Catalogue, at the close of this volume. They were chiefly prepared by Rev. Dr. Stiles, and are as good an epitome of Christian doctrine and fellow- ship as can well be found. On the evening aforesaid, the twenty-nine persons who had thus united them- selves in covenant, although previously belonging to three religious denominations, and to churches in three different States, were publicly organized into a church, called " The South Congregational Church," by an Ecclesiastical Council whom they had invited MINISTRY OF DR. STILES. 37 to meet for that puri)ose, in which were represented by Pastor and Delegate, the Centre, North, Chapel Street, College Street, Howe Street, and Third Church, of New Haven ; the First Church in Fair Haven, and the Church in Westville. The Council had previously approved of the Confession of Faith and Covenant, and had expressed themselves satis- fied with the evidence presented of the regular stand- ing of the applicants in Christian churches, and of their "dismission for the purpose of constituting themselves a Church of Christ," The exercises of the evening were as follows : — Introductory, by Rev. AVm. T. Eustis. Sermon, by Rev. Dr. Bacon. Reading Confession of Faith and Covenant, by Rev. Dr. Cleaveland. Address to the Church, by Rev. Edward Strong. Prayer, by Rev. Dr. Dutton. On the 18th of the same month, (November, 1852,) a Committee of the Church, who had been appointed on the 13th " to consult with Mr. Stiles in refer- ence to his official relations to the Church," reported, " that he regards himself, and wishes to be regarded by the Church, as sustaining the relation of an indef- inite Stated Supply." Whereupon the following preamble and resolution were adopted : — "Whereas the Rev. Dr. Stiles had been engaged as stated preacher to the congregation assembling iu Co- lumbus Street Church, before this Church was consti- tuted, — and whereas it is according to Congregational 38 MINISTRY OF DR. STILES. usage for the Church to express its concurrence in any arrangement that places a pastor over them ; therefore- — " Resolved, That this Church do cordially accept the Rev. Dr. Stiles as their Stated Minister, and do hereby invite him to attend all their meetings for business, as Moderator." On the 19th of the same month, (November, 1852,) Benedict Burwell and Eastman S. Minor were chosen Deacons ; and on the 3d of June, 1853, Thomas Horsfall was added to the number. The first Communion of the Church was held on Sabbath forenoon, December 6th, 1852, on which occasion five persons were admitted by profession, and three by letter. At that Communion, as at all subsequent ones to the present time, the usual hours of worship in the forenoon were entirely devoted to Sacramental services. On the first Sabbath of each alternate month, from that date to the present, the Lord's Supper has been administered, — with this vari- ation, that after the Communion in December, 1859, no other was held until the following March, (three months,) — the object being to change the order of the months in which the Communion was held. It is now held in January, March, and so on, each alter- nate month, to the end of the year. Many of these celebrations have been deeply solemn and impressive, and besides church-members, have attracted largt numbers of other j)ersons, to see and hear. In most, if not all the other Congregational Churches in the city, the Lord's Supper is administered every month. MINISTRY OF DR. STILES. 39 The Chapel, which Avas completed and opened for use about the beginning of 1853, became at once the place for holding all religious meetings, except the regular preaching services of the Sabbath. Between those services was held the Sabbath School. On Sabbath evenings there was a large gathering in the Chapel proper, attracted by the powerful extempore addresses and prayers of Eev. Dr. Stiles ; on Tues- day evening there was a lecture or prayer meeting ; on Wednesday afternoon and evening, in their room over the Chapel, a meeting of the Ladies' Benevolent Society, which was instituted November 11, 1852, (three days after the organization of the Church,) and which at this period assembled every week ; and on Friday evening a prayer-meeting. The Ladies' Society devoted the afternoon to sewing for benevo- lent purposes ; at tea-time they sat down to a plain but inviting supper, having all the ajDparatus for making tea and otherwise furnishing the tables, with- in their own precincts ; after tea, an hour or two more was spent in sewing ; then the Pastor took charge of the meeting, and the remainder of it was devoted to strictly religious exercises, — including an address, singing and prayer. These meetings were turned to excellent account by the Pastor, who con- versed familiarly with the persons in attendance, and when he found cases of special seriousness, which he often die], he would invite them into his study, in the adjoining room, and talk and pray with them, after the usual manner of an Inquiry Meeting. 40 MINISTRY OF DR. STILES. Quite a number of persons, now members of the church, trace their first permanent religious impres- sions to the influence of these meetings. The table was supplied by the ladies in rotation, or by such of them as were able to bear the expense, except that a gentleman of the congregation oflPered to provide sugar and tea, which he has continued to do ever since, of the choicest quality. One of the standing rules of the Society is, that " only one kind of cake be furnished, under jDcnalty of one dollar." At the anniversaries of the Society this rule does not apply. On the contrary, every member, on such occasions, brings in what she pleases ; and the consequence is, that there are not only several kinds of choice cake, but almost every thing else that a lady's ingenuity can think of, to make up a rich and inviting repast. The original number of members was only eighteen ; but it has since very largely increased, and includes gentlemen as well as ladies, — the former paying an annuity of one dollar, and the latter of fifty cents. At some of the anniversary meetings, more than a hun- dred persons have sat down to the tea-tables, which, of course, in such cases, have to be spread more than once. The influence of these gatherings upon the social interests of the church and congregation is very valuable, as it brings and keeps the members acquainted with each other, and tends to do away those distinctions which so naturally creep in, even among the members of the same religious organiza- tion. This Society still continues to prosper, after twelve years of successful experiment. MINISTRY OF DR. STILES. 41 So also does the Sabbath School, Originally trans- fen-ed to the South Church from the Mount Pleas- ant School House, as before stated, it was in every respect a humble institution, if institution it could be called, but has since grown to liberal dimensions, — more than 200 teachers and pupils haying sometimes been in actual attendance. Under the able superin- tendence of Deacon Warner, supported by a corps of faithful teachers, its numbers continue to increase. From it many plants of righteousness have been transferred to the church, thence, it may be hoped, to be transplanted into the Paradise above. Two or three years ago, one whole class of young ladies, five or six in number, who had for a considerable period enjoyed the instructions and counsels of Deacon Hors- fall, were hopefully converted, and united with the church. It has long been customary, and still is, to have a Sabbath School festival on Christmas day, in the Ladies' Eoom, over the Chapel, where short addresses are made, hymns sung, and a prayer offer- ed, at the close of which a bag of sweetmeats, fruits, &c. is distributed to each pupil. These are always interesting occasions, especially to the children, and are very largely attended. At the last festival of the kind, December 26th, 1864, (the 25th being Sun- day,) there was a larger gathering than ever before on a similar occasion. The whole number of per- sons present, including children, must have been nearly or quite 400, About 165 bags of s-sveetmeats, fruits, &c., were given out, — and^l60 or 170 per- 4 42 MINISTRY OF DR. STILES. sons, cliiefly adults, sat down to tea. No person who accepted a Lag, was allowed to take supper at the rooms. In the course of the evening, an hour or more was occupied in singing ; several accom- plished musicians being present and participating. Eev. Mr. Carroll and his lady and mofJier were there, and added to the interest of the occasion. At a late hour the company separated, after an entertainment, moral, social and physical, which, taken all in all, has seldom been equaled in any church. There was a great abundance and variety of choice food, fruits, &c., including a barrel of fresh oranges, just arrived from Porto Kico ; and notwithstanding the bountiful repast enjoyed by so many, there was a handsome surplus of money and other good things, after supply- ing the wants of all. There are also quarterly meet- ings of the Sabbath School in the Chapel, which take the place of the regular Chapel services on those evenings, and are largely attended. A Young People's Prayer Meeting was commenced at a very early date, in the Chapel, at the close of the afternoon service, and has been continued, with occa- sional interruptions, to the present time. Just now it is merged in the "Fulton street Prayer Meeting," BO called, which is held in the Chapel on Sunday evenings. But to go back to the thread of our narrative. While these collateral agencies, most if not all of them, were in operation and efficiently conducted, as long ago as the beginning of 1853, — that is to MINISTRY OF DR. STILES. 43 say, almost from the very organization of the South Church, — the Sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God, was powerfully wielded by Dr. Stiles, Dr. Nathaniel W. Taylor, and others ; and as might be expected, God •' left not himself without witness, in that he did good, and gave us rain from heaven." A few scraps from Dr, Stiles' lettere written at that period, will show his estimate of the state of reli- gious feeling in the congregation : "New Havev, Dec. 13, 1852. "A good meeting last night. Six persons among us now entertain hope. One or two interesting developments of this kind." [From another letter without date, but which must have been written about the same time with the above.] " Our seriousness has decidedly increased since Sabbath. The young person of whom I spoke as having taken a wrong direction, but whose early conversion I anticipated, rejoices in Ciirist. * * * It is a little remarkable that ahnost every awakened one says that he was impressed from the very beginning of our services. Remember two things : — our (perhaps) sincere prayers that God would descend and own that House as his accepted sanctuary, by the move- ments of his Spirit, at that earliest moment, and forever aft^r. Call to mind your own frequent remark, when there was yet no outward manifestation of Divine influence, that the sermons preached would show their fruit by-and-bye. Mr. and Mrs. said to me after meeting last night, that since their own conversion they had not seen such a demonstration of religious feeling as they then witnessed." "New Havex, Dee. 22, 1862. " One or two conversions this week ; particularly a Miss , awakened last Sabbath. Prayer Meeting very crowded." 44 MINISTRY OF DR. STILES. The same encouraging state of things continued for months, and with some variations, for years. It hardly amounted to a " revival/' in the usual accept- ation of the term ; yet in the long run it produced the fruits of a revival. But one Communion passed, in the course of several years, say from 1852 to 1857, when there Avere not more or less admissions to the Church ; [for particulars, see Catalogue at the close of this volume ;] and we remember well what a cause of lamentation it was to the good man who had the interests of the Church so much at heart, that even one such season should pass without any visible in-gathering. As a Southerner by birth and early education, — as a Christian, with a heart large enough to compre- hend the wants of the whole country and the world, — Dr. Stiles was among the foremost in a movement commenced in the city of New York about a year after he came to New Haven, " for the diffusion of Gospel truth in the Southern and Southwestern States." A Society for that purpose, called the " Southern Aid Society," was organized at q, Con- vention of clergymen and others from different parts of the country, held in said city, 28th and 29th of September, 1853. On the 27th and 28th of October following, the Society elected its officers, among whom was Rev. Dr. Stiles as General Agent. The neces- sity for such an organization was very clearly set forth in an Address to the Christian Public, written by Dr. Stiles, and adopted by the Society, from MINISTRY OF DR. STILES. 45 which we can make room for only a few paragraphs, as follows : "It may be asked, — 'Why not accomplish your object through the American Home Missionary Society ? Why form a new Society V The answer is, that the course which the Home Missionary Society is understood to have marked out for itself, does not permit it to perform our work. First, because it is restricted by its rules, from aid- ing any minister or missionary, however faithful, laborious or self-denying, who, under any circumstances, is a slave- holder. And secondly, because the impression is general at the South, that the Home Missionary Society is closely allied to Abolitionism, so called. This impression, how- ever erroneous, renders the aid afforded by that Society to churches in the Southern and South-Western States, of doubtful value in reference to success ; insomuch that, in some cases where such aid had been rendered, it had been voluntarily relinquished by the recipients, needy though they were, as a damage rather than a benefit. While, there- fore, we are convinced that the American Home Missionary Society, without a change of pojicy, is essentially unable, even if it were disposed, to perform our work, we desire still to cherish towards it the sentiments of kindness and good will, which, with some of us, date back to its organ- ization, and even before ; for some of us aided in its forma- tion. Most of the numbers of the Southern Aid Society are, and long have been, supporters of the American Home Missionary Society ; and some of them are among its largest contributors. They expect to aid -it still. They rejoice in its efficient labors at the North and West, and hope, in some measure, to supply its lack of service at the South and South-West. The wJioIe countrij is our field. In so far as it is occupied by the American Home Missionary Society, we gladly co-operate. Where that Society pauses or falters, there the Southern Aid Society begins its separate action, and thence proceeds. Thus, between the two, if Providence smiles upon our efiorts, the whole of our beloved country will be cared for and aided, according to the measure of the benefactions of the churches." 4» 1S49-30 1850-1 18J1-2 18.52-3 301 311 305 313 228 224 213 215 15 15 14 12 488 515 533 547 46 MINISTRY OF DR. STILES. "In the American Home Missionary Society's Annual Reports, the ministers or missionaries aided, are classed under the heads of New England, Middle, Southern, and Wi stern Stales. The number so aided, for a few years past, in each of tliese geographical divisions, according to said Reports, is as follows : 15)48-3 Kew England States, 302 Middle do 239 Southern do 15 Western do 463 Total, 1,019 1,032 1,065 1,065 1,087 " The largest number aided in the Southern States, in any one of the last five years, is 15. It is proper, however, toVeniark, thatin this (not unusual) classification, Kentucky and Tenessee, as well as Missouri and Arkansas, are ranked as Western States. Delaware and the District of Colum- bia are included among the Middle States. In all the slave-holding States, including the District of Columbia, the Society aided an aggregate of ^j& ministers or mission- aries, 30 of whom resided in Missouri, and nearly all the rest in other States bordering upon free territory. In all the wow-slave-hoiding States, the Society aided 1,031 minis- ters or missionaries; being more than eighteen times as many as in the slave holding States. In Maryland, South Carolina, Florida, Mississippi, Louisiana and Texas, com- prising, according to the last census, a population of 2,675,- h29 souls, and an area of 424,032 square miles, the Society, last year, aided not a single minister or missionary. In Georgia, Alabama and Arkansas, with an aggregate popu- lation of 1,887,309 souls, and an area of 160,920 square miles, it aided only three ministers or missionaries, one in each State. " Without'going further into particulars, is it extravagant or unkind to say, that the A. II. M.S. is not accomplishing in the Southern and South-Westeru States, all that might be reasonably expected from its national designation — much less all that is demanded by the immensity of the field, MINISTRY OF DR. STILES. 47 (844,144 square miles, equal to 108 such States as Massa- chusetts,) the greatness of its population, (9,663,997 souls,) or tlie magnitude of the interests involved, both for this world and the next? And if such be the fact, need we any apology before a Christian people, for attempting, as God shall enable us, to occupy that most important and too long neglected missionary field, and to turn in that direction some portion of the zeal, effort, contributions and prayers, of the denominations with which we are connected. Pre- cisely this is the object of the Southern Aid Society." " We commend it to all who love the Church and the nation, — God and man. We dedicate it to the Lord Jesus Christ, — God and man, the Head of the Church and the Saviour of the world. And here we register our prayer, that its spirit may ever be Christian only, to all classes, and especially to Christian brethren; that its management may soon win tiie conlidence of all Christian Societies toil- ing in the same cause ; and that its work may thus be en- tered up, on the grand final record of the earth :— The SouTHKRN Aid Society,— in the Service of God, — THE Supply of the Needy, — Salvation to the Lost." Notwithstanding the strong attachment of Dr. Stiles to his church and congregation, and his deep interest in their welfare, he felt it his duty to accept the General Agency of the new Society, at least in part, and it was finally arranged that he should de- vote one half his time to said Society, and the other half to his church in New Ha,ven. This made it necessary that regular assistance should be provided for the supply of the pulpit in his absence, instead of depending, as had hitherto been done, upon casual engagements. Accordingly, three difterent clergymen, who occupied the position of Pastors in as many churches, were successively invited to this field as 48 MINISTRY OF DR. STILES. Associate Stated Supply ; "but they all successively declined/ althougli they had severally given us every reason to expect their acceptance of our invitation. In giving such encouragement, they were doubtless sincere, and spake as they meant. But the fact that they were wanted here, made them more highly valued by their people at home, who accordingly rallied around them, increased their salaries, paid up arrearages, and otherwise manifested so much kindness and affection, that their Pastors could not leave then. In announ- cing to his people the third of these successive disap- pointments. Dr. Stiles complimented them on their money-power [they were generally poor] ; remarking that they not only paid a liberal salary to their own minister, but had raised the salaries of three other ministers, and how many more he could not say. In this state of things. Dr. Stiles deeming it of great importance that he should enter upon his new work without further delay, Kev, Gurdon W. Noyes, a graduate of Union Theological Seminary, who for two or three years had ministered to a church in Portsmouth, Va., and more recently to a church in Cornwall, Vt., was engaged as temporary Supplj^, commencing his labors on tlie 2d of April, 1854. This engagement terminated on the 4th of June fol- lowing. On that day, after the forenoon service, the church and congregation tarried, by request of Dr. Stiles, and on motion it was *• Votcil, That we cordially approve of (he oniployment of Rev. Gr. W. Noyes as Associate with Dr. Stiles in the niin- ir^try of this chnrch and congregation." MINISTRY OF DR. STILES. 49 On the 25th of June, in the same year, Mr. Noyes commenced his labors in the new relation. Under this arrangement aftairs moved on quietly, without any thing very noticeable to record, (the two ministers cooperating when Dr. Stiles was present, and when he was absent, Mr. Noyes performing all the duties of the ministry,) until Sabbath evening, Nov. 15th, 1857, when Dr. Stiles, finding his whole time and energies required in behalf of the new Society, ten- dered his resignation in full as Stated Supply of the South Church. Whereupon the following preamble and resolutions were presented and adopted : " Whereas, The Southern Aid Society having extended an earnest request to the Rev. Dr. Stiles, the Stated Pastor of this church and congregation, that he will devote his whole time to the interests of that Society, and learning from Dr. Stiles that it will be in accordance with his views of duty to accede to this request : Therefore, "Resolved, 1st. That this Church acknowledge the princi- ple to be of sacred obligation, for every servant of God to take that post of duty which will give him the widest sphere of influence. "2d. That in the request made by the Southern Aid So* ciety for the entire services of Dr. Stiles, we i-ecognize his call to an extensive sphere of Christian labor, which, in the providence of God, he is peculiarly fitted to occupy. •' 3d, That while we highly appreciate the services of Dr. Stiles as our Stated Pastor, and he enjoys our unabated confidence and esteem, we do approve of his acceding to the request of the Southern Aid Society, believing it to be a call from our Divine Master, for him to work in another part of His vineyard," Thus was terminated a connection which to many of his people was fraught with inestimable blessings, 50 MINISTRY OF DR. STILES. and which afforded to thousands not belonging to his immediate congregation, and many of them from dis- tant places, opportunity to hear the words of life and salvation from one of the most remarkable men of the age. And although now a wall of separation is built up between his former people and himself, so that neither he can come to them nor they go to him, yet they have the assurance in their own hearts that such of them as are true believers, will soon meet him in a world where wars and fightings and alienations are known no more. Dr. Stiles left his people at a most interesting period, when the wave of religious revival which commenced in the Fulton street Prayer Meeting and afterwards spread over a great part of the land, had begun to flow, and had already, in its incipient in- fluences, reached New Haven, The experienced ship- master does not more clearly foresee the coming storm, than Dr. Stiles discerned in advance the signs of those times. Several weeks anterior to the date of his resignation, he remarked to the present writer that he believed we were on the eve of one of the greatest revivals ever known. He alluded to the manifesta- tions of a pervading religious feeling in New York, Newark and other places, and expressed his belief that it was the precursor of events which would make heaven and earth rejoice. CHAPTER III. MINISTRY OP REV. MR. XOTES. On the 29th of November, 1857, the South Church passed the following resolution : ''Resolved, That Rev. G. W. Noyes, late Associate Pastor with Kev. Dr. Stiles, be requested to act as Stated Pastor until we can determine upon more definite arrangements." December Ist, Mr. Noyes accepted the invitation. Dec. 27th, the following minute was presented by the Committee and adopted by the Church, "Having been informed that the Ecclesiastical Society recently organized* in connection with this church, have voted to offer Kev. G. W. Noyes a salary of S1350 per annum for his ministerial services, this church do hereby request the Society to unite with them in a common invita- tion to Rev. G. W. Noyes to become their Pastor." Januaiy 1, 1858, Mr. Noyes declined. January 16th, the Church, in concurrence •with the Society, voted to engage his services as Stated Supply until Spring ; which they had previously learned would be agreeable to him. April 10th, 1858, at a meeting of the Church duly warned, and held in the Pastor's study, the call to Mr. Noyes to become their Pastor, was renewed, w^ith a salary of $1500. The * The Ecclesiastical Society was organized Dec. 5, 1857. See Ap- pendix. 52 MINISTRY OF REV. MR. NOTES. Society concurred. April 18th, Mr. Noyes accepted the invitation. Accordingly, an Ecclesiastical Coun- cil, called by the parties jointly, was held on the 24th of May, in the South Church, — the following churches being represented, viz : Third, North, Col- lege Street, Chapel Street, Howe Street, Centre, Yale College Church, and South Church. Among other papers submitted to the Council, was one from the Fourth Presbytery of New York, certifying to Mr. Noyes' good standing in the church and in the min- istry. The Council having decided that the examin- ation and credentials of Mr. Noyes were satisfactory, proceeded to his installation on the evening of the same day, in the South Church, as follows : Introductory Services, by Eev. Mr. Atwater. Sermon, by Kev. Dr. Stiles. Installing prayer, by Rev. Dr. Cleaveland. Charge to the Pastor, by Rev. Dr. Dutton. Right hand of Fellowship, by Rev. Mr. Hamilton. Address to the People, by Rev. Mr. Eustis. Benediction, by the Pastor. Thus, for the first time since the organization of the church, it was provided with a regularly installed Pastor, technically so called. The winter and spring had been a season of special religious interest in his church and congregation, as well as in other churches of this city and elsewhere throughout the country. It was the season of " the great revival." On the 6th of June, 1858, the fruits of it, so far as the South Church was concerned, were gathered in, — 26 MINISTRY OF REV. MR. NOYES. 53 persons being received by profession, and eight by- letter. Unfortunately, for nearly a month (including three successive Sabbaths) when the revival was at its height, our minister was absent at the West. The Deacons and other members did what they could to direct inquiring souls to Christ ; but it was felt to be a calamity, that in our time of greatest need, we were left destitute of ministerial aid, except as the pulpit was supplied by neighboring ministers on the Sabbath. Occasionally, after Mr. Noyes became sole Pastor, Dr. Stiles, whose family still resided in this city, was invited to occupy his former pulpit. It was jnirely a "labor of love," without any visible motive but a desire to do good, and gratify his old friends in the Church and congregation, to whom his voice was always welcome. His official duties as General Agent of the Southern Aid Society kept him more and more away from the city, and about the close of 1859, one of the members of the South Church, learning that he was about to be absent several mouths, very innocently suggested to Mr. Noyes the I)ropriety of inviting him to give us a sermon before his departure. The tenor of Mr. Noyes' reply will be gathered from the following letter, dated New Haven, Dec. 24, 1859. Rev. G. ^y. Noyes, Ml/ dear Sir : — Your favor of the 14th inst. reveals a state of things in our Church and society which is much to be regretted. I have taken a little time to consider it. 5 54 MINISTRY OF REV. MR. NOYES. The case is Ibis : On the 12th inst. I ventured to sug- gest to you, that as Dr. Stiles was about to leave this part of the country, and to be absent several months, many of his former people would be gratified to hear him preach " at least once," before his departure. You reply in sub- stance, that you " have no personal objections to such an arrangement," but that " many of the people have :" That some have impliedly or indirectly found fault with you for inviting him to i)reach so often already ; and have said that if it continued, they should have to go elsewhere: That the last time he preached, a number of the choir left, and the remainder tarried reluctantly, as a matter of respect and duty : That others, on coming to the Church and learning that he was in the pulpit, went away elsewhere. In this condition of things you are pleased to ask my opinion as to the course most expedient for you to pursue. I will answer with all frankness, expecting you, after all, and wishing you, to exercise your undoubted right " to invite whomsoever you clioose, to occupy your pulpit." But before I proceed, allow me to dispose of two or three preliminaries. And 1. As to the frequency of your inviting Dr. Stiles to preach. According to the best of my recollection and belief, he has preached in our Church but — [Here is a blank in the rough draft from which we copy, but on referring to a relia- ble record, we find that within the previous fifteen months Dr. Stiles had preached in the South Church five sermons; one of them during Mr. Noyes' absence on his annual vaca- tion, when the pulpit was supplied by the Society's Com- mittee.] 2. ^Notwithstanding the drawbacks of which you speak, is it not true that even now the audiences are larger w]ie7i the j^uhlic are auarc that he is to preach, than at other times? 3. Have not some persons, including some members of the Church, left us, and gone to other Churches, under an impression that he has been discourteously treated. And what is the demand of the class of persons of whom you speak ? What is the condition on which they will con- sent to remain with us and be quiet? It is simply this; that the great and good man who laid the foundation of our MINISTRY OF REV. MR. NOYES. 55 spiritual edifice in faith and prayer, — such prayer, and such holy \vrestlin*2:3 as I never before lieard from the lips of man; who dedicated our sanctuary to Almighty God, Fa- ther, Son and Holy Ghost, and in so doing, on the very first day of his ministrations, sent an arrow of conviction to the heart of an infidel and atheist, which was never ex- tracted until he found joy and peace in believing ; whose eloquent, faithful, pungent words of love and warning aroused the slumbering community around to the interests of the soal and eternity, — filled the house with profoundly attentive audiences, larger on an average, in the afternoon, (when he was expected to preach,) than tiiose of any other sanctuary of our denomination in the city; who gathered our Church, drew up our Covenant and Confesssion of Faith, instituted or gave tone to our Ladies' Meeting, making it a centre of attraction to the whole neighborhood, and to many ladies in other parts of the city ; who was the instrument, in the judgment of charity, of bringing scores of persons to Christ, including many individuals residing out of the city ; who was the means, my dear Sir, of //our coming to New Haven and holding the position you now occupy, and who, as the whole congregation can bear witness, treated you with uniform courtesy in all our public assemblies; and who to this day, although olEcially separated from us by calls to other fields of labor, does still often and earnestly remember us in his prayers, and is ready to serve us, in any way con- sistent with his other duties and our wishes ; I say the class of persons of whom you speak, if I rightly understand their views, require tiiat this holy man, who has done so mucli for us, shall be deliberately and permanently excluded from tiie pnlpit which he so long and faithfully occupied. The question is not, as I understand it, whether he shall be invited to occupy the pulpit at this time, but at any time. The object seems to be, to fix a stigma upon him — to pro- scribe him ; for what reason I do not know, I am not aware that he has done anything to forfeit the confidence of the Church and Society — nmch less their Christian courtesy. True, he was born South of Mason's and Dixon's line, has written a book, and has been an officer of tlie Southern Aid Society, whose object is simply and only to dispense the 56 MINISTRY OF EEV. MR. NOTES, Gospel of Clirist to ten millions of people, including tiiree and a half millions of slaves, from whom the American Home Missionary Society has withdrawn its aid. But I do not perceive that either of these facts, or all of them together, constitute a just ground of offence to a Christian congregation. Viewing the matter in this light, I scarcely need add, that I can never be a party to such proscription, either actively or passively. If my own personal gratification were alone involved, I would cheerfully forego that gratifi- cation for the sake of peace. But if peace can be had, only on the condition of sacrificing a great and good man, of whom the world is not worthy, to the moloch of ultra Abolitionism, and of surrendering those noble edifices, that pulpit, and the institutions connected therewith, to the pro- motion of the same proscriptive and malignant spirit, then in my judgment the purchase is too dear, and I prefer to meet the issue as it stands. I well know that as a member of the Church and congregation, I have no more control over the action of eitlier, than has the obscurest of our members. I am willing it should be so. And you will bear me witness that I have never sought to encroach upon the rights of the pulpit. At the same time I have some riglits peculiar to myself. 1 have expended more than $50,000 upon the South Church enterprise, in the erection and fur- nishing of the buildings, and in supporting, in part, the expenses of the establishment for the last seven years. I have never, for a single moment, regretted the expenditure. On the contrary, I am ready to expend $50,000 more, if necessary, ty carry out the objects of the enterprise as originally contemplated. What those objects arc, you were early apprised ; and your acceptance of the station which you now occupy, is proof that, substantially, they met your a])probation. What they are, is evidenced by the history of the enterprise thus far, in connection with the fact that down to this day I have never (romplained of the manner in which they have been carried out. But if a now order of things is to be introduced; if the mad spirit of ultra Aboli- tionism, which has already divided so nuniy churches, greatly damaged the interests of the slave, and brought our country MINISTRY OF REV, MR. NOYES. 57 to the brink of ruin, is to be infused into our church and to become dominant in its management, — which I do not be- lieve, though I thus speak, — I have only to say, I shall want the buildings for their original purpose, and my money to sustain the enterprise on that basis. It is but a few months since Ilev. Dr. Bacon, seeing Dr. Stiles in his congregalion, came down from the pulpit, and in the most cordial manner invited him to preach, — which he did. Are the South Church and congregation so much more intolerant than Dr. Bacon and his congregation, as the facts stated in your letter would seem to imply? I doubt it. I should like to see the experiment tried. I believe that a fair expression of the views of our people would show that they are generally conservative, and that the class of persons to whom you allude, are in a lean minority. From what I have said, you are prepared for my opinion, which is, that such intolerance, discourtesy and ingratitude, towards a faithful soldier of the Cross, as would be exem- plified in his exclusion from our pulpit, for no assigned cause, but, so far as appears, to gratify an unreasonable and cruel prejudice, should not be yielded to, — no, not for an hour. Three or four years ago, a few disafi"ected persons, of the same class, left us in disgust, and we have had peace ever since. If those who now threaten to leave, unless their wishes are complied with, should do so in fact, the probability is that the church and society will be stronger, happier, safer and better in the end, than by retaining tliem within its bosom. I know not who they are ; I am glad I do not. But whoever they are, however many or however few, I cannot advise an act of palpaljle injustice and wrong, for the sake of retaining them. Let us i)rotect and honor God's faithful ministers, and he will protect and bless us. As to temporalities I have no fear. And I am sure no spiritual blessing can be expected as the result of proscrip- tion such as is sought to be imposed upon us. Should you, all things considered, conclude to invito Dr. Stiles into your pulpit once before he goes South, permit me to suggest that a ii(»tice of the fact be given in the niiWspapiMs. Then any who are unwilling to hear him, can stay away, and thus avoid the indecorum of leaving the 5* 58 MINISTRY OF REV. MR. XOYES, house. As to the choir, or a portion of tliem, they must do as they tliink proper. Tor one, I wouhl rather dispense with singing than yield to such dictation. What is it, in ejafcct, but surrendering the pulpit to their control ; or at least, giving them a veto upon the action of the pastor? I pro- test against such an invasion of his rights. In conclusion, permit me to say, that at tliis time espe- cially, any manifest slur upon a good man merely because he is a Southerner by birth, would be most unfortunate in its public bearing ; and occurring in a church which has been generally supposed to be conservative, and is known as such all over the South, would have a very bad effect upon the public mind in that part of the country, which is in an excited and dangerous state. Do let us try to pour a little oil upon the troubled waters, and not let our glorious constellation go down in blood. I remain with much respect. Your friend and parisliioner, GERARD IIALLOCK. P. S. I have said nothing to Dr. Stiles about this whole matter. He does not know from me, that any correspond- ence has taken place between us. On the receipt of this letter, and after consultation with some of his members, Mr. Noyes concluded to invite Dr. Stiles to preach, as proposed, and did invite him. Public notice was given in the newspapers, and on the 8th of January, 1860, Dr. Stiles preached to a very large and apparently gratified audience. The choir was as full as usual, and no j^ersons left the house, tliat we are aware of, until the services were concluded. This is the last sermon but one that Dr. Stiles ever preached in the South Church. The whole period of Mr. Noyes' ministry in con- nection with the South Church, was a little more MINISTRY OF REV. MR. NOTES. 59 than seven years ; or gay from April 2, 1854, till June 3, 1861. During the last half of this period, or say from Nov. 15, 1857, till the close of his labors, as above, he had the sole charge of the Church and congregation. Either to accompany or follow such a man as Dr. Stiles, was obviously a difficult under- taking. The wonder is, that Mr. Noyes was able to sustain himself so long and so well as he did, rather than that he finally failed to give satisfaction to a people, who, in the language of one of the other cler- gymen of the city, had been "spoiled by Dr. Stiles;" meaning, that the South Church people had been so accustomed to hear the powerful preaching of Dr. Stiles, that no minister of ordinary talents and resources could expect to satisfy them. On the 15th of May, 1861, Mr. Noyes tendered his resignation, as follows : — To the iioufh Congregational C/iurc/i, New Haven, Co7in. Dear Brethrkn : — Learning tliat a small, yet influential minority among you, liave recently become disaffected towards me, so as se- riously to interfere with my comfort and usefulness, I felt it to be my duty to resign my ehargc; and do herewith re- sign it, to take effect on the 3d of next June; and request you to unite with me in calling an Ecclesiastical Council to meet on that day in said church, at half past 3 o'clock, to dissolve the relation existing between us. GURDOX W. NOYES. New Haven, May 15th, 1861. As usual in such cases, difierent persons would give different versions of the causes which led to this re- 60 MINISTRY OF REV. MR. NOTES. suit. Perhaps the most impartial statement which can be had at this time, is the Report of the Stand- ins' Committee, submitted to the Church at a meet- infi- held on the 24th of the same month, to consider the above communication. Said Committee consisted of Charles H. Warner, Dr. John Nicoll, and R. S. Pickett, elected members, and Deacons Minor and Horsfall, together with the Pastor, members ex-officio. Of tlie five lay members, three belonged to that wing of the Church which has since broken off from the main body, and two of them (Dr. Nicoll and Mr. Pickett) were among the warmest friends Mr. Noyes had in the Church. The Report of that Committee was as follows : — Explanatory Statement from the Committee of the Church. " It is well known to most of the members of the Church, that within the past year, and more particularly within the ])ast six months, the attendance on our Sab])ath services and the other regular weekly meotiugs of the Church, has seemed to be graduully diminishing. Notice has been ta- ken of this by the Pastor and the Committee of the Church, and by other members. Conversation on the subject, and inquiry as to its cause, revealed the fact that many mem- bers of the CHiuroh and congregation were in the habit of frettucntly going to the meetings of other churches, and that a considerable number of the regular and constant at- tendants on the meetings of our own Church, — including those ui)ou whose liberality the enterprise has mainly rest- ed for its support, — were stron^dy imi)ressed with the con- viction that this enterprise could not l)e carried forward suc- cessfully under the ministrations of our present I'astor. This led to some informal consultations on the subject, which resulted in a communication of the facts, as they were then understood, to Mr. Noycs, by the Committee of the Chunh. MINISTRY OF REV. MR. NOYES. 61 "While it was obviously impossible for Mr. Noyes to continue his laljors with satisfaction under such circum- stances, it was felt that a separation, if it must take place, should be made in a manner that would do least injury to our minister's reputation, and to the welfare and peace of the Church. In this point of view, it was considered bet- ter for Mr. Noyes that he should tender his resignation he- fore, rather than after a public meeting for the discussion of the subject. Hence, no public meeting has before been called. "It was also considered equitable that Mr. Noyes should receive sacisfactory pecuniary compensation for the disad- vantage to himself and family of leaving his charge under such cireumstances; and arrangements have therefore been made, satisfactory to Mr. N., by which, in case his resigna- tion is accepted, he is to receive a donation of $500." After some discussion, tlie following resolution was adopted by the Church, with only five dissentients, including two who did not vote on either side. " Resolved, That in accordance with the expressed desire of Rev. G. W. Noyes, we hereby accept his resignation as Pastor, while we regret that circumstances have made it appear necessary for him to leave us and sunder the ties of pleasant and profitable intercourse which, for a period of seven years, most of us have enjoyed with him." The Church also voted to unite with Mr. Noyes in calling an Ecclesiastical Council. Said Council was held in the South Church, June 3d, 1861 ; and com- prised delegates from the Centre, North, Third, Chap- el street. College street, and Yale College Church. The result was embodied in the following Resolu- tions, prq)ared by Rev. Dr. Dutton, and Rev. Messrs. Eustis and Fisher, which the Council adopted unan- imously : — 62 MINISTRY OF REV. MR. NOYES. "Resolved, That while, in compliance with his own deci- ded wish, we consent to the separation of Mr. Noyes from his charge, we bear our united testimony to the ability, faithfulness and success, as a Pastor and preacher, which have characterized his labors in this place. " Resolved, That we express our cordial interest in the welfare of this flock of Christ, and earnestly pray the Great Head of the Church to send them a successor to the Pastor they have lost, who shall l)uild them up iu the faith of the Gospel, and who shall fully and fearlessly declare and ap- ply all its doctrines and precepts." This united prayer of the Council, we may chari- tably believe, lias been answered ; if not exactly in the way intended, — in a much better way. As "suc- cessor to the Pastor we have lost," God has sent us a man who '•' builds w^ his jieo^de in the faith of the Gospel ;" and who, if he does not preach or pray Abolitionism, and blood up to the horses' bridles, if necessary to accomplish that object, does preach and pray wdth the angel choir which heralded the infant Saviour, " Peace on earth, good will toward men." If he does not so " declare and ajijdy all the doctrines and precepts of the Gospel" as to play into the hands of a political party ; if he does not preach election- eering sermons on the Sabbath, just before a Presi- dential election ; he does beat up recruits for the Cap- tain of Salvation ; he does electioneer for the King of kings. But the members of the Council appear not to have been satisli(;d with the manner in which their prayer was answered ; else why, eighteen months afterwards, did nearly the same body of men, with some others added, attempt to reverse that answer. MINISTRY OF REV. MR. IS'OYES. Oo by silencing or disjilacing the aforesaid " successor ?" But more of this in the sequel. Mr. Noyes' '' Farewell Sermon" was preached in the South Church, June 2, 1861, being the day before his resignation was to go into effect, and was soon after published. It was a sort of stern-chaser, dis- charged upon his people as he was about to leave them. He virtually admits the declining state of the Church and congregation, but attributes it mainly to the people themselves. He tells how many thousand calls he had made (4,449) during his connection with the South Church, how many prayers he had offered (1,000) in the course of those visits, and how many other good things he had done. He says, — " During the four years of colleagueship, I received to the Church one hundred by profession and forty- six by letter ; and during the three years since, seventy- seven, — thirty-six by profession and forty-one by let- ter, — making a total of 223." If Dr. Stiles, in giving an account of his own ministry, should be equally grasping, there would be very little left for Mr. Noyes. He would say, as Mr. Noyes does, — " During the four years of colleagueship, 1 received to the Church one hundred by profession, and forty-six by letter." And on the same principle might he not add, — " JL also sowed the seed, and, ere I left, saw the grain spring up, which was harvested by Mr. Noyes in the following June." If Dr. Stiles should say this, — which he would be far enough from doing, — how would it strike Mr. Noyes ? Would he deem it quite 64 MINISTRY OF REV. MR. NOYES. iliir and honorable for Dr. Stiles to set to his own account all tlie fruits of their joint labor "during the four years of colleagueship," and so leave nothing for Mr. Noyes as the result of his three years' labor, after the in-gathering above mentioned, except nine persons admitted by profession, (an average of three -per annum,) and a less number by certificate than "were dismissed during the same period ? We simply ask the question, and according to the answer given, will be Mr. Noyes' verdict in his own case, with only this variation, that " during the four years of col- leagueship," which were in fact but three years and a half, Dr. Stiles was the principal, and Mr. Noyes the assistant. In dealing with his people, the author of the Ser- mon was much less exposed to be over-indulgent and partial, than in reviewing his own labors. Accord- ingly he proceeds to "reprove, rebuke and exhort" them, agreeably to the instructions of Paul to Timo- thy, specifying " three things," which he says " have already retarded the growth and success of the Church, and which, if not corrected, will work more unfavor- ably in the future." They are as follows : — " 1. There has been an erroneous idea of the Pastor's work. Too much lias been laid u])(»u and expected of him." Under this head he asks : — " Is it not a fact too patent to be questioned, that upon him was placed almost the entire burden of the Church's affairs ? In addition to preaching and visiting, has he not had largely to sustain the Sabbath evening and weekly meetings, and even lead the singing? Has not the oi)inion found expression in word as well as deed, that he was expected so to preach as to fill the Church MINISTRY OF REV. MR. NOYES. G5 and keep up a continual revival ? And by such an atti- tude would not he be disheartened and the Church par- alyzed V If these questions are to be answered in the affirm- ative, as they are evidently intended to be, they add Mr. Noyes' testimony to that of the Committee as to the dilapidated spiritual condition of the Church and congregation at that period. It is worthy of remark, that the evil of which Mr. Noyes complains, has not always existed in the South Church. It was not so under Dr. Stiles — it is not so under Mr. Carroll. On the contrary, there are very few churches within our knowledge, where so large a proportion of the male members are ready to be called upon foi* exhortation or prayer. How is it in the " Fulton street Prayer Meetings," as they are called, wdiich are now held every Sabbath evening in the Chapel ? Is there any difficulty in finding laymen there who are willing to speak or pray ? None whatever. Numerically the church is not quite so large as when Mr. Noyes left ; and yet the attendance on these meetings is quadru- pled, and the spirit of them excellent. How is this to be accounted for ? It cannot be caused by the return of those " many members of the Church and congregation" who, under Mr, Noyes' administration, according to the Report of the Committee, " were in the habit of frequently going to the meetings of other churches," — for they have not returned. On the contrary, almost all of them have left us for good. On the whole, we know not how to account for the 6 G6 MINISTRY OF REV. MR. NOYES. difFerciit state of things in tlie same congregation under different ministers, except by attributing it, or much of it, directly or indirectly, to the ministers themselves. This is on the supposition that the com- ])laint of Mr. Noyes on this head was well founded, which, to the extent indicated by his remarks, we must be permitted to doubt. 2. " A second element of weakness and injury to the Church, is the neglect of wise discipline." Never until the preaching of this Sermon, did we hear it intimated that Mr. Noyes was more ready to administer " wise discipline" to delinquent members, than were tlie great majority of his Church. We had heard, that in regard to two Scotch people whom it was proposed to discipline on account of the sale and use of intoxicating liquors, Mr. Noyes objected to doing it at that time,^ because, he said, the Scotch were clannish, and if some of them were offended, they might all be, and leave. [A Scotch minister was then preaching once or twice on the Sabbatli in Dr. Cleaveland's Lecture Koom, and some of our * On inquiring of some who were tlien members of the Standing Committee, we learn that we wore not misniformed; and lliat in the matter of discipline generally, Mr. Noyes was certainly not in advance of the other members of the Committee in his efforts to promote it. According to the rules of the Church, it is made the duty of the Stand- ing Committee to "examine and report on all cases of discipline." If then the Standing Committee, (of which Mr. Xoyes was ex-officio a member, and by position the leading memlicr,) did not do their duty, why reproach the Church f>r the Conmiittee's own neglect? MINISTRY OF UEV, MR. NOYES. G7 Scotch people were in the habit of attending.] In a few months after Mr. Noyes left us, these two persons were sus]ienclcd from the privileges of the Church, and afterwards struck from the list of members ; as were two other persons, for similar oflfences. 3. "A third hindrance to the Church, is the unprecedented assumption of the nnnority." What that assumption is, or was, Mr. Noyes does not say in so many words, but leaves it to bo inferred that the minority assumed to overrule the majority. He says, " The pastoral relation, left to the tender mercies of a minority, has no security whatever, and better never be formed. It can be sundered at the capriciotis or malicious beck of a single individual." Well, who were the minority in the South Church ? Mr. Noyes' own friends and adherents. What is the proof that they w^ere in the minority ? Their votes ; which on the resolution to accept his resignation, stood three or five* to sev- enty, as was testified by the Chairman of the South Church Committee before the Council which dis- missed Mr. Noyes. But we do not believe that this minority, or any other minority, claimed to overrule the majority. If they did, we never heard of it until announced in Mr. Noyes' Farewell Sermon. It is too absurd a position for rational men to take. Un- doubtedly the minority claimed a right to speak to * There were three negative votes, and two persons did not vote. 68 MINISTRY OF REV. MR. NOTES. their brethren on affairs of common interest, and to influence their votes if they could convince their judg- ments. But this, so far from being an " unprece- dented assumption," is a universal and just claim. Yet it appears to be the only basis for the charge preferred by Mr. Noyes under this head ; for, in an- other place (p. 13) he says, "If the majority, after being teased and tormented by them [the minority] for a time, should yield to their unreasonable demands, his pleasant and useful relation to them would be broken up, and he set adiift, when he might have labored on successfully for years." So, after all, there is no assumption of power on the part of the minority ; they only " ^ease and foiTuent :" just as a fly leases and torments an elephant, until at length the noble animal, overcome by its importunity, sur- renders at discretion ; and thus the " small yet influential minority" becomes a majority. But to drop the figure, — we know of nothing to jjrevent a minority, however small, from endeavoring to bring the majority over to its views by sound argument or undeniable facts ; and if successful, the presumption is, that the minority were right, and the majority wrong. In the case before us, there was no necessity for such an effort : for no sooner had there been a comparison of views, than it was seen at once that a large major- ity were in favor of a change. And when the vote was taken on the acceptance of Mr. Noyes' resigna- tion, it was, as we said before, all but imanimous. It was a perfectly free, fair and full vote of the MINISTRY OF REV. MR. NOYES. 69 Church, and was unanimoiisl)^ sanctioned by a Coun- cil composed entirely of men in sympathy with Mr. Noyes on all the agitating questions of the day. There was every disposition on the part of his people, one and all, to make the separation as harmless as possible, both to his ministerial reputation and to his personal comfort. With this view they gave him $500, and it was in their hearts to increase the amount by voluntary contributions at a parting soiree, to be held in the Ladies' Parlor of the Chapel ; and at the same time to put forth expressions of sentiment which would relieve the discomfort felt on all hands in sundering a relation so sacred and so long continued. Such a parting interview was pro- posed to Mr. Noyes through a Committee, but de- clined. He preferred a different course, — and hence these comments. From what has been said, it appears that each of the tliree leading positions of the Sermon was founded in error. If not " unprecedented assumptions," they were nevertheless " assumptions," unsustained by sub- stantial facts. There is one good thing in the Sermon, where the l)reacher says to his people, " Kindly, yet earnestly do I counsel you to give to my successor your sym- pathy and cooperation, if you would have new and more glorious things done for you by his ministry." Some of us are trying to heed this wholesome counsel. The way the preacher's special friends have done it, is a caution. 6* 70 MINISTRY OF REV. MR. NOTES. Mr. Noyes had not been long disconnected from the South Church, before he received and accepted an inA'itation to the pastoral charge of a Church in Fair Haven, Conn., where he still continues his labors. CHAPTER IV. MINISTRY OF RET. MR. CARROLL. After Mr. Noyes left the South Church, its pulpit continued vacant for about a year. In the course of that period, forty-four different clergymen occupied it successively, some of them very able men, inclu- ding several pastors of churches. For a number of months, neither wing of the Church seemed disposed to make any movement towards the settlement of another minister. All knew that there was a lurking antagonism among the members, which would be likely to show itself whenever a suitable occasion should occur to bring it out. Some of them hoped that time would reconcile differences, and for that reason were willing to wait. At length, on the 24th of October, ISGl, at a meeting of the Church, a pro- position was made to invite Rev. J. Parsons Hovet, D. D., (since deceased,) of the Eleventh Presbyterian Church in New York, to become our Pastor ; and on the following day, at an adjourned meeting of the Church, the motion was adopted. A large majority of the Church and Society w^ere in his favor ; but a few individuals objected, on the ground that he was disloyal, a pro-slavery man, and a Secessionist ; or to that effect. The Church took the trouble to test the truthfulness of these allegations, by sending their two Deacons down to New York, to inquire into the facts, 72 MINISTRY OF REV. MR. CARROLL. The Deacons called ujjon Kev. Dr. Thompson, for- merly of the Chapel Street Church in this city, Rev. Dr. Hatfield, Rev. Dr. Asa D. Smith, and Rev. Mr. Coe, of the Am. Home Missit)nary Society, all of them strong anti-slavery men, from whom, and from other sources, they learned that Rev. Dr. Hovey was one of the most estimable ministers in the city ; that he was not a Secessionist, nor in any proper sense a j)ro-slavery man, nor disloyal to the government. And when another Committee of this Church and Society waited upon his Presbytery, to present our call, there was a general outburst of, "We cannot spare him ;" " Nobody can fill his place ;" " He is doing invaluable service where he is," &c., &c. His own Church also were in great alarm at the prospect of losing him ; paid up the arrearages of his salary ; offered him more ; and by a strong Committee urged upon the Presbytery the absolute necessity of retain- ing him where he was, unless they were willing to see his large Church and Society, with its eleven hundred Sabbath scholars, broken up and disbanded. Accord- ingly the Presbytery passed a Resolution, requesting the South Church to desist from the further prosecu- tion of the call. Dr. Hovey felt himself bound by the rules of the Presbyterian Churcli to abide by the decision of the Presbytery, and so the call was with- drawn. This was voted at a meeting of the South Church, Deo. 1, 18G1. Tlie failure to secure the services of Dr. Hovey was a great disappointment to some of our members, who MINISTRY OF REV. MR, CARROLL. 73 knew him personally, and -vvlio had hoped, from liis kind and conciliatory bearing, long experience, and high qualifications, both as a Pastor and Preacher, that he would be able to unite the jarring elements of our Church and congregation, and thus prevent a rupture, which otherwise seemed inevitable. The Committee of Supply, consisting of Deacons Minor and Horsfall, had nearly exhausted the list of candid- ates, and no one of those who had been heard, ap- peared to be the man for us. In the case of one of them, a motion had been made to engage him as Sta- ted Suj^ply for one year, but the majority voted no. Under these circumstances, on Sunday morning, December 29th, 1861, a young man made his appear- ance in our pulpit, who, until the day previous, was unknown, even by sight, to any person in the house ; and Avho, in his turn, had never seen an individual belonging to the Churqh or congregation. It after- wards appeared that a clergyman in the interior had sent his name to our Committee of Supply, as one who might, perchance, be acceptable to us, and we to him. On the strength of this recommendation, the Committee had written to him, inviting him to preach one Sabbath : and here he was, a perfect stranger, in a strange pulpit, having never before been in New Haven. The first impression which he made upon the audience, was not entirely favorable. But he had not proceeded fiir, before wliat had seemed to be over- action, disappeared in the real warmth and energy of his discourse. His text was, — " Therefore the un- 74 MINISTRY OF REV. MR, CARROLL. godly shall not stand in the judgment." Ps. 1 ; 5. It was a powerful and deeply impressive sermon. When the service was over, the general inquiry was, " Who is the preacher V " Where is he from ?" &c. It was soon learned that his name was Carroll, and that he was a son of Rev. Daniel L. Carroll, D, D., the successor of Dr. Lyman Beecher, in Litch- field, Conn. A few of our members had sat under the preaching of Dr. Carroll, in Litchfield, and re- membered him with the highest veneration and res- pect. In the afternoon, the young man preached from the text, " Then the king's countenance was changed, and his thoughts troubled him." Daniel 5 ; 6. This discourse was in no way inferior to the for- mer. At the quarterly meeting of the Sabbath School on Sunday evening, he addressed the children, keep- ing them spell-bound for nearly an hour. The entire services of the day were full of interest, and a gene- ral desire was expressed to hear him again. Accord- ingly, the Committee of Supply invited him to oc- cupy the pulpit on the following Sabbath, January 5, 1862, to which he consented. The morning of that day was our regular Communion season. Mr. Carroll administered the Sacrament, addressing the Church Avith much effect, from the words, "It is fin- ished." In the afternoon he preached from the text, " But they constrained him, saying, Abide with us ; for it is toward evening, and the day is far spent." Luke 24; 29. In the evening, being the Monthly Missionary Concert, Mr. Carroll was present, and took MINISTRY OF REV. MR. CARROLL. (O part in the exercises. Althoiigli laboring under great lihysical weakness, few persons in the congregation were aware of it, and still fewer would have inferred it from any lack of energy or powder in his perform- ances. There was, however, a general desire to see and hear more of him, and a general feeling that we had at last found our man. The Committee, there- fore, invited him to preach a third Sabbath ; but he respectfully declined, remarking, that they had had a fair specimen of his preaching ; that if he should preach a dozen times, he might not do any better, and he hoped he should not do worse. At a meeting of the Church on the following Friday evening, Jan. 10th, it was — " Voted, That the Society be requested to extend a call to Rev. J. Halsted Carroll, to supply the pulpit and act as Pastor for the term of one year." On the next day, Jan. 11th, 1862, the call was for- warded to Mr. Carrol], at Brooklyn, N. Y., and soon afterwards he signified his acceptance of the same, as follows : — "Brooklyn, N. Y., Jan. 17, 1862. "Dear Brethren : — "After deliberate and i)rayerful consideration, I feel that duty directs me to the field of labor and love to which you, as a Church, have so unitedly and recently called me. * * * And now, as I accept your call, my fervent prayer to the Great Head of the Church, is one which I know will be endorsed and uttered by you, and the dear people of God vou represent, that I may "come to you in the fullness of the blessing of the Gospel of Christ ;" and 76 MINISTRY OF REV. MR. CARROLL. when come, that I may " know nothing among you save Jesus Christ, and Him crucified." "Affectionately yours, in the bonds of a common Lord, J. HALSTED CARROLL. Messrs. Thomas Horsfall and E. S. Minor, Committee." This cheering intelligence was soon blighted by the receipt of a letter from Mrs. Carroll to one of the Dea- cons, stating, under date of Brooklyn, January 31st, that in consequence of Mr. Carroll's severe indisposi- tion, his physicians had ordered him as far South as he could go, so as to enable him to escape the coming Spring here ; and that the state of his health was such as would prevent his undertaking the duties of a charge for at least six months to come. It was, tliereforc, " with tearful regret, and yet with submis- sion to the mysterious providence creating the neces- sity, that Mr. Carroll must, for your sakes, recall his acceptance, and thus release you from the obligations which his acceptance involved." At a meeting of the Society's Committee, holden on the 1st of February, 1861, the above-mentioned letter was read and considered : — Whereupon, the following Kesolution was unanimously adopted : — " Resoloc.J , Tliat the Conmiittee of the South Church Society have licard with deep regret tlie statements com- municated by IMrs. Carroll, througli Deacon Horsfall, with regard to the impaired licallh of her husband; aiul of the necessity imposed ujxm him by medical advi(!e, to postpone all ])rofessional and pastoral labor for some months to come; and they sym])athize deeply in the regrets expressed by Mr. and Mrs. C. in his consequently being obliged to recall his acceptance of the engagement we had proffered him. MINISTRY OF REV. MR, CARROLL. 77 And that while this Committee regard his proposal to re- call his acceptance, as highly honorable to Mr, Carroll, they earnestly request that he will allow the engagement to stand, with the hope that by the kind providence of God, at the end of six months, if not before, he may be able to assume the duties to which with such gratifying unanimity our people have called him." This action of tlie Society's Committee having been communicated to the Church at a special meet- ing, held on the 2d of February, 1862, the latter body adopted the following resolution : "Resolved, That this Church do hereby concur in the sentiments of the Society's Committee as embodied in the resolution just read ; and would earnestly pray the great Head of the Church to have our Pastor elect in His holy keeping, and if it please Him, to restore him speedily to health, that we may enjoy the benefit of his labors." The above resolutions were forwarded to Mr. Carroll by a Committee, and elicited the following reply : Brooklvx, K Y., Feb. 12, 1862. My very dear Brethren : The minutes of the South Congregational Society's Committee, adopted at a meeting held Feb. 1st, together with the resolution endorsing them, passed by the Church on the following day, were received duly, and the generous request contained therein "to permit the engagement to stand," has been carefully and comprehensively considered in all its relations both to you and to myself. The honor thus conferred is one which I sincerely appre- ciate, and cannot too highly estimate; — whilst the sweet sympathy tendered in this hour of sickness and despond- ency, and the manifestations of attachment evidenced, evoked (he sweetest and most cordial reciprocity. Upon this deliberate re-expression of your choice of me as your 7 78 MINISTRY OF REV. MR. CARROLL. minister, and upon the strength of the reciprocal love I bear you as a Church of Christ, I base my hearty accept- ance of your renewed proposal : — feeling too, that the same Providence re-decides me which first led me to you, gave me a call from you, directed my affirmative answer, com- pelled afterwards the withdrawal of it, and now, by your recent action, permits and prompts my re-acceptance. The interval of separation ere we expect to meet and mingle in endearing fellowship, I trust will be one of prepa- ration and prayer on the part of both ; preparation of mind and heart, that will but furnish more thoroughly for every good word and work, both preacher and people. My time shall be yours, spent with reference to you, though absent from you; whilst my heart is already yours, in all its warmest out-goings of Christian love. Permitting me again to thank you for the honor, sympa- thy and attachment, manifested toward me in this renewal of your call, I close this my answer with a hope, and a prayer ; — the earnest hope that by the kind blessing of our dear God, I shall be entirely restored to wonted health and vigor at the expiration of the mentioned months, — and with the oft-repeated prayer that Jesus, the great Head of his Church, will give me multitudes of deathless souls as the seals of my ministry among you, to be set, at last, as pol- ished jewels in His own radiant crown of rejoicing. In the bonds of the Gospel, and in the sweet hope of heaven, I remain, faithfully and affectionately, . J. HALSTED CARROLL. To Messrs. T. Horsfall, E. S. Minor, and others, Committee. This final acceptance, by Mr. Carroll, of the call which had been tendered him, was responded to in behalf of the Society's Committee as follows : New Haven, Feb. 15, 1862. Rev. J. Halsted Carroll, Mij dear Brother .-—Your letter of the 12th inst., ad- dressed to the Committee of the South Church Society, MINISTKY OF KEV. MR. CAKROLL. 79 was duly received, and laid before the Committee at a meeting held last evening ; whereupon the following reso- lution was passed, which I am instructed to communicate to you, vi/ : ''Resolved, That the Committee have read with great satisfaction the letter from Rev. J. H. Carroll, signifying his re-acceptance of the call extended to him by the So- ciety's Committee and the Church; and they trust that a kind Providence will fulfill all the good wishes expressed therein, regarding his restored health and future usefulness among us." With fraternal and Christian regards, I remain, very truly yours, E. S. MINOR, Clerk of South Church Society's CoTtunittee. In the three or four months whicli elapsed between Mv. Carroirs acceptance of the call, and the com- mencement of his labors as Stated Supply, there was ample time for any who doubted his antecedents, to inform themselves fully on that head. And we may here remark, that if certain individuals had made a tithe of the effort to acquaint themselves with his real history, which they did to discover some stain upon his character, or some delinquency in his life, they would have been more than satisfied, if any thing good could satisfy them. They would have found that he was the son of distinguished parents ; that his father occupied positions of the highest em- inence in his profession, and all with great accept- ance and usefulness ; first, as successor to Rev. Dr. Beechcr, in Litchfield, Conn. ; then as Pastor of the Presbyterian Church on Brooklyn Heights ; then as President of Hampden Sidney College, Va. ; and 80 MINISTRY OF REV, MR. CARROLL. lastly as Pastor of the First Presbyterian Churcli in Northern Liberties^ Philadelphia. To the last men- tioned Church there were added during his ministry of five years and four months, 259 members, or an average of forty-eight per annum. Ill health at length compelled him to relinquish his charge, and after a few years of increasing illness, he departed this life at the age of fifty-five, with the words, " Christ is all my hope," upon his lips. The writer remembers him well, and can attest the truthfulness and fidelity of the following portrait, drawn by Rev. Thomas J. Shepherd, who now occupies the same pulpit which Dr. Carroll vacated in Philadelphia. He says : " Dr. Carroll was largely endowed by nature and grace with the qualities which give success to the preacher and pastor. In person he was tall, slender, yet symmetrically formed. He had a complexion rather dark ; an eye singu- larly fine and expressive ; a countenance that easily took on a winning smile, or brightened into a glow of animation ; and a voice, withal, of great compass and melody, modu- lated ever with an exquisite taste. In manners he was uncommonly bland, graceful, fascinating. He had the rare faculty of making himself equally agreeable to people of all ages and of all ranks. " In native intellect and studious culture, he was un- doubtedly superior to most men. He had in ample meas- ure the intuitive power of veason, and the imperial power of imagination. In College and in Seminary he studied hard, too hard indeed for his physical strength, yet so suc- cessfully as to gift the workings of his mind with a pro- digious force. "In sensibility, moreover, he was quick, subtle, strong. He had a nervous organization which perhaps was too highly strung for the world's rough ways, but which made MINISTRY OF REV. MR. CARROLL. 81 him keenly susceptible of aflfection, and enthusiastically ardent in attachment. " He was, too, in executive talent, a more than ordinary man. He had the disposition as well as the ability to labor. He wrought his sermons with pains-taking fidelity, and with disciplined skill. He gave himself to the work of the min- istry with a zeal and self-forgetfulness that revealed not more the sense of religious responsibility than the spirit of indomitable energy. "And all these qualities, native and acquired, were under the control of a profoundly scriptural and eminently con- servative piety. He loved truth, and sought it ever with an inextinguishable thirst. He loved the souls of men ; and, so long as his strength lasted, sought their salvation with an indefatigable earnestness. He was, in a word, a noble example of the Christian man and the cultivated minister." Such was the father of Rev. J. Halsted Carroll, the present minister of the South Church, New Haven. The latter was born in Brooklyn, N. Y. ; made a pro- fession of religion at the age of thirteen years ; en- tered College before he was fourteen ; and graduated at the University of Pennsylvania, in July, 1851. In the following year he entered Princeton Theological Seminary, and graduated in May, 1855. At the close of his second year of theological study, he was licens- ed by the Presbytery of Philadelphia to preach the Gospel ; and on the 30th of May, 1855, (the year he left the Seminary,) he was ordained and installed by the Presbytery of New Brunswick, as Pastor of the Presbyterian Church in Jamesburg, New Jersey. The exercises of the occasion were opened with prayer by Rev. Dr. McDonald, of Princeton. Rev. Dr. Hall, 82 MINISTRY OF REV. MR. CARROLL. of Trenton, preached the Sermon. Rev. Dr. Hodge, of Princeton, then stated who Mr. Carroll was, and what studies he had pursued, which he said had been entirely satisfactory to the Board of Directors of the Theological Seminary, and to the Presbytery. He next proposed a series of questions to the candidate, ind also to the people, which were answered satisfac- torily, and then calling the Presbytery around the candidate, who took a kneeling position, offered up an impressive prayer, while the Presbytery were lay- ing their hands on the candidate's head. When the prayer was over, the candidate rose, and the several ministers present welcomed him as a member of their body, Kev. Professor Green, of Princeton, delivered the charge to the Pastor, and Kev. Dr. McDonald, the charge to the people. Rev. Dr. Hodge pronoun- ced the benediction, and then called upon the mem- bers of the Church to come and greet their Pastor, which was done by a large number. The Church of Jamesburg, over which Mr. Carroll Avas thus install- ed, is near the preaching-ground of David Brainerd, and within a few miles of the Church where those holy men, the Tennants, labored with such wonderful zeal and success. In the midst of these associations, and stimulated by such examples, Mr. Carroll enter- ed upon his labors, humbly desiring to emulate Brai- nerd's heart- wish, — " that I was a flame of fire in the service of my God." Faithful labors, put forth in such a spirit, could hardly fail of producing a rich harvest. Accordingly, from the very beginninj of his MINISTRY OE REV. MR. CARROLL. 83 ministry, there was more or less seriousness among his people, and occasional conversions. In the course of the following year, (1856,) these cheering manifesta- tions deepened into a powerful revival, which affected not only his own congregation in Jamesburg, but also the neighboring congregation of Manalapan, where he labored a part of the time. A brief account of this revival was published in the New York Observer by Mr. Carroll, under date of "Jamesburg, Dec. 11, 1856. " Since it has pleased God most signally to bless my own and a neighboring Church, and indeed tins whole section of his vineyard, with the special out-pouring of his Holy Spirit, I take tlio liberty of sending you a brief narrative of the state of religion here at the present time, knowing it will prove a matter of rejoicing to you, as well as to the hearts of your numerous Christian readers. During last Spring, my Church enjoyed a delightful revival of religion, the influence of which has continued, and been manifest, more or less, ever since. But it is within the past six weeks that indications of the sjiecial presence of the Spirit have been seen, and the effects of his presence felt. In this period, besides the usual prayer meeting, we have held two weekly services in the Church, so eager and earnest are the people to receive the word of life. Indeed, never in this community has there been such an intense and pervading interest on the subject of the soul's salvation, as now. Christians are awake. El- ders are at work, meetings for prayer and inquiry literally thronged, and in going from house to house and from soul to soul, time and again is heard the cry, ' What must I do to be saved V And so universally is the influence of the Spirit of God felt, that I have not found five out of the thousand and more diiferent individuals whom I have ad- dressed personally, who were not both willing and waiting to hear. AVith us, truly blessed is this scene and season. Of the ninety members received into our Communion dur- 84 MINISTRY OF REV. MR. CARROLL. ing the past fifteen months, fifty-eight united on profession of their faith ; and of the twenty-nine last Sabbath, twenty on profession. *#***« * # "The revival in the neighboring Church ^the Manalapan) is even of greater extent and interest, if possible. In the first place, it is a new Cliurch : and in the second place, they have never had a Pastor. These two facts lend an unusual interest to their I'efreshing, to them so unspeakably precious. It was my privilege to officiate at their first Communion season, the first Sabbath of October last ; and what a day was that in their history, — memorable to saint and sinner. God was most sensibly and signally pres- ent in his sanctuary there, and has taken up his abode with them ever since, giving the same efficacy to the preached word, edifying his children, convicting and converting his foes. And here I would remark, that in both places and Churches, there were no means employed, or measures adopted, but the simple preaching of the way of salvation through the cross of Christ, and a meeting of inquiry to di- rect the penitent to the Lamb of God. * * * There have been, during the revival here, upwards of a hundred anxious ones in the inquiry meeting, — between sixty and sev- enty cases of hopeful conversion. Of this number, between forty and fifty will probably unite with the Manalapan Church, and the remainder with the neighboring sister Churches. Truly before they called, God answered ; and the people with amazement exclaim. Behold what God hath wrought. J. HALSTED CARROLL, Pastor of Presh. Ch. of Jameshnrgy During tliis revival, the Professors at Princeton were often present and. took part in the multiplied, services ; but no such assistance could relieve the Pastor from excessive labor, care and anxiety, in a period so critical to many of his people, and when the work of years was to be done in a few months or weeks. For a time, the stimulus of joy and hope, MINISTRY OF REV. MR. CARROLL. 85 gratitude and love, sustained him, under toils and burdens which his delicate physical structure had not strength to endure ; but at length his health gave way ; hemorrhage of the lungs ensued ; and there seemed no alternative but to resign his charge, and seek a milder climate, as well as a cessation from la- bor. To this necessity he finally yielded, asking and receiving a dismission from a people much beloved, and who loved him in return. The following resolu- tion was unanimously adopted by his Church on the occasion of his leaving them : " Resolved, That we do hereby publicly testify our grati- tude to God that during Mr. Carroll's ministry here, his la- bors have been signally blest by the out-pouring of the Holy Spirit, and that from a small beginning we have been raised up to be a growing and prosperous Church." A. J. McKELWAY, Chairman. J. C. MAGEE, Secretary. Jamesburg, Feb. 1, 1858. Soon after leaving Jamesburg, Mr. Carroll pro- ceeded South, stopping at Aiken, S. C, a place. of resort for invalids, including many from the North. He had intended to remain there but a short time, but finding his health improving, he occasionally preached, and with so much acceptance, that the good people of Aiken desired him to settle over them as Pastor. With this view a Presbyterian Church was organized there on the 28th and 29th of August, 1858, and not long after a convenient house of wor- ship was erected. Here Mr. Carroll labored with great usefulness and success, for nearly two years. 86 MINISTRY OF REV. MR. CARROLL. He then asked a dismission, for the purpose of going to Europe, hoping to gain more perfect health and strength, as well as to see what was worth seeing in foreign lands, and esi:»ecially to hear the distin- guished preachers of England and Scotland, such as Guthrie, Spurgeon, Cummins, and others. On his leaving Aiken, the following preamble and resolutions were adopted by the Church : " May Uh, 1860. — Whereas, the relation which has sub- sisted between the Aiken Presbyterian Church and the Rev. J. Halsted Carroll, having been dissolved by his voluntary resignation of the office which he has held for nearly two years, — it is fit and proper that some expression of our sentiments should be made and recorded on the occasion of his departure from this field of labor : — Be it therefore " Resolved, That this Church and congregation entertain a very grateful sense of the valuable services rendered by Mr. Carroll in the founding and organization of our Church ; of his zealous devotion to the promotion of our enterprise, and his successful efforts in raising tlie means for the con- struction of our house of worship ; and that we shall also ever affectionately cherish the recollection of his sympa- thising attentions to the members of his flock, in their mingled experience of joys and sorrows, during the period of his pastorship. " Resolved, That with the hope that the able and eloquent discourses which characterized his ministry amongst us, replete with the most orthodox views and pious exhorta- tations, and which may well be compared to 'apples of gold in pictun'S of silver,' may ])rove as the good seed in the parable, and by the blessing Cod yield in due season a rich harvest of spiritual fruit, we tender to him our best wishes for his future hapi>iiiess and ])rosperity. " Resolved, That the above jireamble and resolutions be entered on the Session books of our ('hurch, and a copy of the same be forwarded by the Clerk of Session to Mr. Carroll. W. P. FINLEY, Clerk of Sessionr MINISTRY OF REV, MR. CARROLL. 87 Fortified with strong letters of commendation from some of the most distinguished Americans, to emi- nent men in Great Britain, France, Germany, and other countries of Europe, Mr. Carroll left the United States in the early part of 1860, and was ahsent ahout a year. It does not fall within the design of this sketch to give even an outline of his tour. Suffice it to say that he accomplished, even beyond his expec- tations, all the objects which he had in view ; formed the acquaintance of many celebrated men, by all of whom, on the strength of his letters, he was cordially received ; listened to the preaching of the principal pulpit orators of Europe ; saw whatever he desired to see ; and returned home with improved health, enlarged experience of men and things, and with a strong desire to enter anew upon his great work of trying to benefit and save lost men by the preaching the Gospel of Christ. For a few months after his return, he passed his time chiefly in Brooklyn and New York, preaching here and there as duty called, but without any regular charge, until he was invited to the South Church, New Haven. And this brings us back to the point from which we digressed. He had accepted the call to said Church, but was obliged to postpone for a few months the fulfillment of his engagement, by reason of ill health. On the first Sabbatli in June, 1862, being the 1st day of June, his people were made glad by seeing him in their pulpit, apparently in comfort- able health, and ready to serve them for Christ's sake, 88 MINISTRY OF REV. BIR. CARROLL. in the new relation which had just been formed. His first sermon was from the text, "I ask, therefore, for what intent ye have sent for me," Acts 10 : 29. In the afternoon, " son of man, I have set thee a watchman nnto the house of Israel," &c., JEzekiel 33 : 7, 8, 9. Both were exceedingly appropriate and excellent discourses, and were listened to by pro- foundly attentive and deeply interested audiences. The subjects gave him opportunity to enlarge upon the recii^rocal duties of ministers and people, and their responsibilities to each other and to God. The spirit of tender earnestness and faithfulness to the souls of men, which breathed through these intro- ductory sermons, has characterized his preaching ever since. Not that he is always dwelling upon one theme, — far from it. On the contrary, variety, both of subject and manner, — variety in the construction of his sermons, in the mode of presenting truth, and even in the order of exercises,* is a prominent feature of his ministry. From the wells of salvation he draws ample supplies for the diversified wants of tlie soul, without resorting to politics or shade-trees. *Most commonly, at the close of his sermons on the S-ibbath, he re- tires to liis scat, while the choir, under the direction of their accom. pushed leader, Mr. Frank L. Martyn, strike up a verse or two of somo appropriate hymn or other choice selection, adapted and designed to deepen the impression left by the sermon. The eflfect is often exceed- ingly fine; the singing being good, — unusually so, for a volunteer choir, — and the organ-playing, by Mr. Martyn, admirable. The bene- diction is then pronounced, — sometimes preceded by a few short peti- tions bearing immediately upon the subject of the discourse, and some- times not. MINISTRY OF REV. MR. CARROLL. 89 11 is sermons are full of thought, legitimately derived from his texts, though often not lying on the surface, yet when suggested, so obviously comprehended with- in the scope of the passage, that the hearer wonders he never caught the idea before. There is withal a terseness and point to his discourses, and a beauty of language and imagery, which render it impossible to forget them. His descriptions of scenes and incidents are exceedingly graphic. His " Scripture characters," as presented in the Chapel on Sunday evenings for many months in succession, until superseded lately by the " Fulton street Prayer Meetings," we have never heard surpassed ; so life-like, and so full of instruction. The attendance upon them was very large. To those who never heard Mr. Carroll preach, we may remark, that one half of the power of his discourses consists in the delivery. Sometimes they are written out in full, but more generally not ; and in either case he is entirely independent of his manuscript, seldom even looking at it, but holding- constant communication with his hearers, not onlv by his voice, but by his expressive features and ap- propriate action. His enunciation is remarkably distinct, his voice soft and clear, and his command of the audience such, that amidst the profound stillness of the house, he is heard in every portion of it, even when speaking not much above the tone of common conversation. This is i)artly owing to the admirable construction of the audience-room, in which the laws of acoustics are better consulted than in any other 90 MINISTRY OF REV. MR. CxiRROLL within our knowledge, and partly to the causes above mentioned, viz : clearness of enunciation and still- ness of the house. The fact, however, that with so little strain ujion his voice, he is heard with perfect ease and comfort on the part of his audience, is a great relief to him ; and may account in a measure for his increased health and strength, notwithstand- ing his abundant labors, — having no facilities for exchanging, and generally preaching two sermons on the Sabbath, and sometimes a third in the evening. It is a common remark among his people, that he is constantly improving, both in matter and manner. There is one peculiarity in his manner which we must not omit to mention, viz : that it combines in about equal proportions, gentleness and fire ; two things theoretically inconsistent with each other, but practi- cally exemplified in the South Church every Sabbath. As an extempore speaker especially, his powers are extraordinary. Take him when and where you will, on any subject, in the pulpit or on the platform or in the conference-room, he is always ready, and always good ; seldom hesitating or recalling a word, but going on like a quiet, steady stream, supplied by never-fail- ing springs, until he has occupied the time allotted him, or accomplished the end at which he aimed. His duties as minister of a large parish, (for he has much to do outside of the limits of his congregation proper, in visiting the sick, attending funerals, &c.,) are quite enough for any one man to perform ; yet occasionally he steps beyond the exact limits of his profession, as MINISTEY OF REV. MR. CARROLL. 91 at the Irish Relief meeting in Music Hall a year or two ago, where, for an hour or more, he electrified an immense audience, who responded with peal upon })eal, and cheer upon cheer. On all sucli occasions he is '' at home," knowing exactly where and how to strike the popular ear and heart. It is well that such extraordinary sjieaking talents are consecrated to " Christ and his cause," and not to the drama, or the bar, or politics, or the forum. New Haven may well be proud of such a minister, and such a man. Mr. Carroll came here without any flourish of trum- pets, or anything in the position or circumstances of his Church and congregation to give him consequence or bring liini into notice. He was deliberately shun- ned by ministers of his own denomination, or rather, of the denomination to which his Church belonged, as if they thought they could extinguish his light by not recognizing -its existence. Meanwhile the tongue of slander was secretly moving against him, and had the greater power for mischief because he was so little known in this community. Men pro- fessing the religion of Jesus, acted as if they thought they were doing God service by undermining the influence and impairing the usefulness of one of His faithful ambassadors. He, however, went on with his proper work, trusting in God to vindicate his reputation and prosper his labors. Nor did he trust in vain. God gave him many souls as seals of his ministry and crowns of his rejoicing. [For particu- lars see Catalogue at the close of this volume.] His 92 MINISTRY OF REV. MR. CARROLL. congregations steadily increased, and have continued to increase, until now, on Sabbath afternoons at least, they are believed to be larger, on an average, than those of any other Church of the same denomination in the city. And this, notwithstanding the remote- ness of his j)osition from the centre of poi)ulation. The same increase was and is seen in the Sabbath evening meetings, and in those held during the week. Many influential families from town have joined the congregation, taking slips, and otlierwise identifying themselves with its interests. A more harmonious, prosperous and happy Church and congregation it would be difficult to find. Their minister is univer- sally beloved by his people, as well as respected and honored. This makes his burdens light. And here we must recall some circumstances which it would be more agreeable to omit, did they not occui^y so prominent a place in our history, and were they not, in fact, a key to the prosperity which, under God, we now enjoy. Mr, Carroll had not been long in his present position, before it was discovered by a jjortion of his peoi:)le that he did not ring the usual changes on the subject of slavery and the war. In short, he did not make politics a part of his religion. Of course, had he made any politics but theirs a part of his religion, it would have been an awful desecra- tion of the jiulpit and the Sabbath ; but their poli~ tics were an essential ])art of Christian ethics, and no minister who ignored them, could be a faithful ambassador of Christ. Accordingly they began to MINISTRY OF REV. MR. CARROLL, 93 comi)lain — of him and to him. And finding this unavailing, they sent him written remonstrances and arguments, designed to convince his understanding and rectify his judgment. Doubtk'ss they were sur- prised to find him still insensible to the claims of duty as they understood it, — still blind to their view of the obligations of his sacred calling. When at length they despaired of bringing him out on these subjects, — when they saw that his own convictions of propriety and duty forbade it, — the next step was, to attempt to get rid of him. So they began to agitate for a change. But it was not until the 18th of Feb- rury, 1863, that they had opportunity to show their strength. On that day was held a Church meeting, of which public notice had been given, for the special purpose of providing for the supply of the pulpit after the termination of Mr. Carroll's year, ending 1st of June following. It is not to be denied that there was some anxiety among the friends of Mr. Carroll, as to what would be the result. The lines were not so distinctly drawn among the members, at least in many cases, as they are at present. There were quite a number of floaters, standing upon our books as members, who very seldom attended our Church. They were truants under Mr. Noyes' ad- ministration, and equally so under Mr. Carroll's ; but now they were all on hand, as in duty bound, to assist in determining the question who should be our next minister. After the meeting had been organ- 94 MINISTRY OF REV. MR. CARROLL. ized, a member moved the following resolutions, which were duly seconded : Resnlvecl, That with grateful acknowledgments to our Heavenly Father for the blessings he has bestowed and is still bestowing in connection with the labors of our beloved Pastor, Rev. J. Halsted Carroll, we hereby express our earnest desire for the continuance of those labors, and of the relations now existing between Mr. Carroll as Stated Supply, and this Church and Society, until the same shall be annulled or modified by the joint consent of the parties, to wit, this Church and Society on the one part, and Mr. Carroll on the other, or by the separate action of either of said parties, in which latter case it is the opinion of this Church that at least four months notice in Wi-iting, should be given by the party desiring a change, to the party not desiring it ; with the single exception, that this condition should be waived in favor of Mr. Carroll, if at any time by reason of bodily infirmity he should be unable to perform the duties of his office. Resolced, That if, to relieve himself from an amount of labor l)cyond his physical strength, Mr. Carroll should de- sire the cooperation of Rev. Myron Barrett as Associate Supply, and if the expense of the whole arrangement can be brought within the means at the disposal of the Society, this Church deem it very desirable that Mr. Barrett, (whose labors among us have been highly appreciated,) should be engaged as such Associate, until the 1st day of May, 1864, leaving any further arrangement with \\\\\\ beyond that date, to depend upon circumstances and the wishes of the parties. Resolved, That these resolutions be communicated to the Ecclesiastical Society connected with this Church, at its meeting appointed to be held this evening. New Haven, Feb. 18, 1803. On the question of adopting these resolutions, a lively debate ensued, — most of those members who were opposed to Mr. Carroll, expressing their views MINISTRY OF REV. MR. CARROLL. 95 in words. A few of bis friends also spoke, — one of them as follows : * " I protest against the doctrine that because a man does not deny an accusation, lie therefore admits it to be true. Why, according to this doctrine, a minister might spend half his time in vindicating himself against false accusa- tions, and after all there would be " a few more left." I trust this Church will never have a minister who will spend his time so unprotitably. " Besides, a minister's private judgment on public affairs is his own property : as much so as the private judgment of any other citizen is the property of that citizen. It is lodged in a sanctuary which no man has a right to invade. The owner of that sanctuary may open it, or not, as he pleases ; but no one can force it open without being guilty of impertinence and oitpression. " If a minister cannot justly be required to declare his politics, much less can he be required to preach them. He has a right to preach them, if such be his convictions of duty, but he has an equal right to withhold them. In either case he is responsible to his Maker, and to his own conscience, for the course he pursues. He is also respon- sible to his people, — to this extent, that if they deem his course objectionable, and if that course is persisted in, they have a right, as individuals, to withdraw from his ministry ; or as a Church and 8ociety, to dissolve their connection with him, under proper forms, subject to all the obligations and conditions of his settlement. Thousands of Churches and religious Societies in this our land have been broken up or depleted by one or the other of these processes. We need not go beyond our own city to find an illustration. How else can the fact be accounted for, that the aggregate attendance upon Congregational Cluirches in this city has scarcely if at all increased within the last 25 or 30 years, although in the mean time the population of the city has increased three-fold? Within the same period, another de- nomination in this city, from whose pulpits, as a general remark, political topics are excluded, has greatly increased, both in the number of its churches, and in the affgre^ate 96 MINISTRY OF REV. MR. CARROLL. attendance. Congregationalism had the ground, and would have kept it if there had been no drawback upon its admin- istration. " Now, to bring the subject home to ourselves, — we have a minister who does 7iot deem it his duty to preach politics, but who does deem it liis duty 7iot to preach them. He prays for our country, our rulers, our civil institutions, our liberties, our officers and soldiers, especially the sick and wounded, but he does not cater to the appetites of politicians of any party. He pursues the one great object for which he was commissioned as an ambassador for Christ, leaving secular topics to secular days and secular men ; or perchance to those ministers, if sucli there be, who desecrate the Sab- batli and the pulpit by nuiking both subservient to political ends. AVlietlier Mr. Carroll remains with us for a longer or shorter period, there is no probability that he will change his course in this respect, as it is founded upon settled con- victions of duty, and these cannot be yielded to friends or foes. Now suppose, to gratify a few of our members who require a different style of preaching and praying, we con- sent to give up our minister after his present engagement shall have expired — what then l Are we to have a man in his stead who will give us political preaching and praying ? Is this Church to have such a man for its Pastor in place of Mr. Carroll ? If it is, I greatly fear that our prosperity is near its end. But if the Church will regard itself as an organization for strictly religious purposes, everything will be likely to move on harmoniously and prosperously ; for there a]ipears to be no other subject of difference. On this basis all can meet, on equal terms, and work together for the common cause : — Parthians ami Meues and Elamites, and the dwellers in Mesopotamia and in .Judea antl Cappa- docia, in Pontus and Asia, I'hrygia and I'amphylia, in Egypt and in the parts of Lybia about Cyrene, and strangers of Rome, Jews and Proselytes, Cretes and Ara- bians, — Democrats and Republicans, Abolitionists, Seces- sionists and Traitors. And the greater sinners they are, the more they need the pure Gospel of Christ, which is able to make them all wise unto salvation. " It is worthy of remark, that the men who arc loudest in their complaints against Mr. Carroll, are those who know MINISTRY OF REV. MR. CARROLL. 97 least about him. How is it that men who have seldom if ever spoken with him, and have rarelj' heard him preach or pray, should understand liis views, and also his character and history, so much better than we do, " who have been with him Irom the beginning," listened to all his sermons, — who have seen him in the prayer meeting and conference room times without number, — met him at the fireside, in the chamber of sickness, and in the home of soitow, — in short, who have seen and heard him continually for the last nine months, in all the ditferent phases of ministerial and pastoral life. Yet such men come to us at this late day, and tell us, in effect, that we have made a great mistake in the choice of our Pastor, and should by no means retain him longer than the period for which he is now engaged. Well, they are entitled to their opinion, and we to ours. "VVe knoiv what he is. We have listened to his heart-search- ing discourses, his thrilling appeals, his fervent prayers, and his faithful warnings. We have felt the breathings of his gentle spirit upon our hearts, and the Holy Spirit upon his own and upon ours. We have seen the effects of his ministry in greatly increased congregations on the Sabbath, in fully attended prayer meetings during the week, in a goodly number added to the Church or propounded for admission ; in others still seeking the way of life ; in a Sabbath School of 230 members actually attending ; in a large and prosperous Sewing Society ; and in a pervading religious interest, more or less apparent, throughout the con- gregation. And should he still "abide with us," assisted by Rev. Mr. Barrett, we may hope for yet greater things than these. God grant that it may be so ; and that this Church and Society may not so undervalue their inestimable privi- leges, as to sell them for a mess of pottage." At a late hour of the evening, the question was taken on the resolutions, and they were adopted, by a vote of fifty-one to twenty-two. They were then communicated to the Ecclesiastical Society connected with the South Church, which met the same evening agreeably to public notice ; whereupon the Society 98 MINISTRY OF REV. MR. CARROLL. adopted the following resolution, with only one dis- senting voice : " Resolved, That the resolutions of the South Church, communicated to us hy its Clerk, in regard to the future supply of the pulpit of that Church, are cordially approved by this Society, and that a Committee consisting of Deacon Thomas Horsfall, be instructed to endeavor to carry the proposed arrangement into effect." It was carried into effect accordingly ; and the same arrangement still continues. So far, it appears to be a very good arrangement ; giving both to min- ister and people all the freedom of action they could desire, while yet it requires no periodical agitation, as in the case of ministers who are engaged from year to year. The result of the meeting was of course a disappointment to the opponents of Mr. Carroll, and soon after [in March, 1863] a number of them asked and received certificates of dismission, — some to par- ticular churches, — while others took general letters, having reference, it was understood, to the formation of a new Church. The Clerk also resigned, [in April,] who, under the practice then existing, would have had a right, as he would doubtless have been disposed, to call as many Church meetings as the disaffected might desire. Some time previously the Society had been freed in a great measure from the elements of opposition, as appears from the all but unanimous vote above recorded. Tlius far, the ])olicy of the opposition liad seemed to be, to desert the sinking ship, and leave that portion of the crew who remained, MINISTRY OF REV. MR, CARROLL. 99 too weak, or too much di.slieartened, to carry her into port. But the eflfect was exactly the contrary. Both the Church and Society were chereed and encouraged by the absence of a power which, to a considerable extent, had been available only for mischief. True, there were individuals among the opposition, includ- ing one of the Deacons, who had performed their duties faithfully towards the Church and Society, as they understood them ; but others were a mere dead- weight, doing nothing towards the support of public worship, and seldom attending the religious exercises of the Church, though always on hand, or liable to be so, whenever there was any voting to be done. In July [1863] a little incident occun-ed which jiromised for a time to give them considerable capi- tal ; we allude to the bell affair. A few members who had before been wavering, seemed now to be with the opposition. The leaders of the movement took heart, and under the excitement of the hour, seemed really to ho2)e to accomplish their object. Accordingly they got up a paper, with as many signa- tures as could be obtained, requesting the Clerk to call a meeting of the Church, in order to consider the expediency of ashing Mr. Carroll to resign. But here a new diflficulty presented itself. In place of the resigned Clerk, a successsor had been elected (Rev. Mr. Barrett) who was not in sympathy with the " movement" party. When therefore the disaffected members applied to him for the above object, he saw fit to exercise his discretion, under the advice of the 100 MINISTRY OF REV. MR. CARROLL. Standing Committee, by refusing to call the proposed meeting. This led to a further secession of disaffected members, (including the aforesaid Deacon,) who asked and received certificates of dismission- — general letters — July 31st and August 4th. In a few days or weeks the bell excitement passed away ; the old Church was there yet, and its minister also. He appeared to have no idea of leaving ; it was impos- sible to get a Church meeting at that time ; and if a Church meeting were held, especially after this latest secesssion, there would be no chance of voting him away. Under such circumstances, what was to be done ? Clearly, they must give up in despair, or endeavor to retrieve their error. Somehow or other, they must get back into the garrison, where they could have more jDOwer over it than they could as mere outsiders and enemies. So they sought to re- turn their certificates of dismission and resume their membership. But the Church (practically) said no ; we have dismissed you at your own request ; and now we must hold you to the bargain. We cannot receive you back. Here was a dilemma, to be sure ; and it required all the wisdom of the wise and all the ingenuity of the sagacious, to tell them what to do. Various consultations were held with each other, and with friends in town. We were not there, but may safely infer what was the result of their deliberations, from the course subsequently pursued. Call a Coun- cil, they said ; a Mutual Council, if the South Church will consent ; if not, then an Ex-parte Coun- MINISTRY OF REV. MR. CARROLL. 101 cil, which will answer just as well ; for, in either case, they are sure to be condemned. If they consent to a Mutual Council, you will be restored to your rights as members, and, with such re-inforcements as you can get from other quarters, will soon be able to out-vote them. But if they refuse that bait, then do you call an Ex-parte Council, which will be still more sure to condemn them, as all the evidence, and all the pleas, and all the judges, will be on one side. Such a Council will doubtless unchurch the old con- cern, and either pronounce you the South Church instead of them, or assist you in building and organ- izing a new Church, where the "whole Gospel" shall be preached. So the disaffected members, — those who had asked and received letters of dismission and those who had not, — gravely applied to the South Church to join them in a Mutual Council. As they expected, the Church declined. Or rather, the Clerk, with the unanimous approval of the Standing Com- mittee, refused to call a meeting of the Church to consider the question ; and the Church, at their annual meeting a short time afterwards, (Nov. 24, 1863,) passed a resolution approving the action of the Committee, and declaring that in future " the power to call a Church meeting for business, shall rest in the Church Committee together with the Clerk." Thus the way was prepared for the calling of an Ex-parte Council. During all these agitations, which were aimed chiefly against Mr. Carroll, in the hope of either 9 102 MINISTRY OF REV. MR. CARROLL. driviii"- or mortifying him away, he maintained a calmness of demeanor and a steadiness of purpose, which even his opponents cannot fail to respect. Such moral heroism, lodged in such a delicate phys- ical structure, (or any other.) is rarely to he met with. But all these troubles are now over ; even his enemies are at peace with him. At least they are comparatively silent, while his friends, and the com_ munity generally, honor and applaud him. We doubt if to-day there is a more popular minister in New Haven. Certainly there is no one whom the public manifest a greater desire to hear. CHAPTER V. THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. The following is a cojiy of the letter missive by which the Ex-parte Council was convened : " The AFajoriiy of the Brotherhood of tlie South Congre- gational Church in New Haven, to the Congregational Church in . "Brethren: We having been deprived by usurped au- thority of the rights which belong to a Congregational Church, and having stated our grievances in a memorial, asking for a Mutual Council, which memorial was rejected by those who have assumed the power of government iu this Church, do therefore invite you to be present by your pastor and delegate in an Ecclesiastical Council, at the Orange street Chapel in New Haven, on Monday the 21st inst., at 4 P, M., for the purpose of considering the difficul- ties existing in this Church as exhibited in our memorial and in the action thereupon, and of advising us concerning our rights and our duty. E. S. MINOR, ] JOHN NICOLL, AMOS SMITH, G. H. BUTRICKS, > Committee. WM. C. SCOBIE, ROBERT DYAS, GEORGE S. MINOR. ) New Haven, Dec. 12, 1863. The Council accordingly met at the time and jdace above mentioned, and was organized hy the choice of Rev. Wm. T. Eustis, as Scribe, and Rev. Joseph Eld- ridge, D. D., as Moderator. There were present from the 104 THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL, First Church, Hartford — Rev. Joel Hawes, D. D., Pas- tor ; Hon. William W. Ellsworth, Delegate. First Chnrch, New Haven — Rev. Leonard Bacon, D. D., Pastor ; Rev. Chauncey Goodrich, Delegate. Church in Norfolk — Rev. Joseph Eldridge, Pastor ; Bro- ther Robbins Battell, Delegate. North Church, New Haven — Rev. S. W. S. Dutton, Pastor. Church in Wallingford— Rev. Edwin R. Gilbert, Pastor j Deacon John Atwater, Delegate. Broadway Cburcb, Norwich — Rev. C. P. Gulliver, Pastor. Chapel Street Church, New Haven — Rev. Wm. T. Eus- tis, Pastor ; Deacon Smith Merwin, Delegate. Third Church, New Haven — Hon, John Woodruff, Dele- gate. Church in Greenwich — Brother Allen Howe, Delegate. Church in Bristol — Deacon William Day, Delegate, Church in Essex- — Rev. James A. Gallup, Pastor ; Dea- con Charles H. Hubbard, Delegate, Church in Theological Institute — Rev, E. A. Lawrence, Delegate. The South Church, having had no agency in get- ting up this Council, and having declined to recog- nize it in any way, or even to present their records, as requested by the Council, cannot be presumed to know what occurred there during its three days sit- tings, commencing December 21st, 1863, and ending December 23d, except so far as the same has been re- vealed or indicated by the published Result of Coun- cil, which is as follows : RESULT OF THE COUNCIL, Called by " the Majority of the Brethren of the South Con- gregational Church, Xeiv Tlaveft." This Council has been convened by certain brethren styling themselves "the majority of the brethren of the South Congregational Church in New Haven," and com- THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. 105 plaining that they " have been deprived of the rights which belong to brethren in a Congregational Church." AVhether they are, or are not, entitled to the rights of a majority, is a question upon which we are not called to express an opinion, for it is not material to any of the issues involved in their complaint. These brethren, twenty or more in number, have addressed the Chuix-h in a memorial asking for a mutual council to consider certain matters by which they are aggrieved, and their request has been denied. Their right, therefore, of obtaining advice from neighbor Churchps through an cx-parte council, in conformity with a reasonable and long established usage of the New England Churches, cannot be disputed. First of all, tliis Council has made a communication to the Church through its Clerk and Standing Committee, and also to the Rev. J. Halsted Carroll, as another party interested in the matters referred to us, inviting them to appear and offer any explauatidus which they may desire to make concerning the transactions complained of. But these invitations have been explicitly declined. We are sorry to add, that we have been denied all access to the records of the Church, and that the complainants have not been able to obtain authenticated copies of the records, which they desired to present for our consideration. Having carefully considered the documents sulmiitted to us in l)ehalf of the complainants by their committee, and having heard such testhnony as they, in the disadvantageous circumstances in which they are placed, have been able to adduce, we find tlie following matters of fact : I. The Church in question was instituted as a Congrega- tional Church, with the advice and approbation of a council of Congregational Churches, and the complainants became members of it, in the warranted expectation (hat tliey were to enjoy all the rights belonging to the brethren of a Con- gregational Church, according to the principles and usages of the New England Churches. II. The Rev. J. Halsted Carroll commenced his labors at the South Church in December, 1861, being invited by the Society's Commit (ee to officiate as a candidate. Ho was soon afterwards employed by concurrent votes of the 9* 106 THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. Church and Society to supply the pulpit for a year. Before the termination of the year, a meeting of the Church was held to consider the question of a more permanent settle- ment of Mr. Carroll in the work of the ministry there. An arrangement was made, purporting to be between the Church and Society as one party, and Mi: Carroll as the other party, by wliich he was to remain in the work of the ministry among them indefinitely, and which could be ter- minated only when either party should give four months notice of a desu-e for the termination. III. In that meeting the majority of the male members present voted against the proposed arrangement, but their votes were oveiTuled by counting the votes of female mem- bers. IV. The aforesaid arrangement having been made, Mr. Carroll assumed the title and authority of " Pastor of the South Church," subscribing official papers in that charac- ter, being habitually spoken of among the members of the Church, and in Church meetings, by that official title, and being frequently announced to the public as Pastor of that Church. V. Certain members of the Church, fourteen in number, being dissatisfied with the ministry of Mr. Carroll, and desiring that notice might be duly given to him for the ter- mination of the arrangement, presented to the Clerk of the Church their written request for a Church meeting, which request was refused by the Clerk and Standing Committee. VI. Afterwards the same brethren av.d olliers, twenty in all, addressed their memorial to the Chiu'ch, stating dis- tinctly the grounds of their dissatisfaction with these pro- ceedings and with the ministry of Mr. Carroll, and asking for a Council of Churches, to be mutually agreed upon, who should advise with the Church and the complainants. The Clerk, to whose hands the memorial was committed, refused, by the advice of the Stan ling Committee, to lay it before the Church. VII. Between the time when the request was made for a Church meeting and tlie time of preparing the memorial, some of the complainants asked and received letters of commendation, in the ordinary form, by which their mem- THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL, 107 bership in the Church would be terminated whenever they niiglit become meml)ers of other churches. But in the memorial those brethren gave notice to the Church that, upon mature deliberation, they had relinquished their inten- tion of connecting themselves with other churches ; and they remained, in the language of the testimonials which had been given them, " members of the South Congrega- tional Church." VIII. The reply which the Clerk, by the direction of the Standing Committee, returned to the signers of the memo- rial, was addressed " To Amos Smith, G. H. Butricks, and as many other signers of the above-named request as are still recognized members of the Church;" the said Clerk and Committee thereby assuming to exclude from member- ship those signers who held at that moment the written testimonials of the Church to their good and regular stand- ing. IX. At the annual meeting of the Church, held on the evening of Novemlier 24, 1863, Mr. Carroll, acting as mod- erator, denied to the members above mentioned the right of voting, or of speaking in defence of their right to vote ; and that denial was approved by the meeting. The same meet- ing ratified all the doings of the Committee, including their suppression of the memorial. X. The reasons for the dissatisfaction with the ministry of Mr. Carroll, presented to us by the complainants, and sustained by such evidence as the nature of this investiga- tion has made practicable, are the following : 1. They had, at the time of his settlement, no proper evidence that he was an ordained minister of the Gospel in regular communion with the Congregational churches and ministers of Connecticut, or with any evangelical denom.i- uation. 2. Under his ministry there has been in the public wor- ship of that Church, and in the lessons from the pulpit, no utterance of sympathy with our country -in its struggle for imity and life ; no expression of loyal desire for the success of the Government, or the defeat of the rebellion; no word implying that the attempts of the rebels to subvert by force the Goveniment ordained by God in this land, is criminal ; 108 THE EX-PAKTE COUNCIL. no recognition of the righteousness of the cause in which sons and brothers of the complainants, some of them mem- bers of the same Church, are offering their lives. 3. In the pulpit and in private conversation he has char- acterized the action of the Government as tyrannical and unjust, and has implied that the attempt of the Government to maintain itself by force against the rebellion, is criminal; and when members of the Church have courteously inquired of him concerning his views, that they might know whether he had been misunderstood on these points, he has refused to give any satisiactory answer. 4. He lias borne no testimony against the wicked doc- trine of these times, that it is right for white men to make slaves of black men ; but on the contrary, he has used his influence to suppress in the meetings of the Church all allusion to the injustice of slavery. 5. He has by his private and public influence brought certain young [)ersons of the congregation hito open sym- pathy with the existing rebellion. These being the facts as we find them, our judgment is, First. It is a distinctive and cardinal principle of our New England Congregationalism, tluit no person yhall be invested with the pastoral othce in any Church, otherwise than by tlie advice and consent uf neighboring churches represented in a council ; that a minority, liowever humble, objecting to the person chosen by the majority of the Church, may have full opportunitj' to present the reasons for their disst-nt before llie council convened for the pur- pose of ordaining or installing liini ; and that no man can be imposed u])on them as their pastor, unless their objec- tions, after a fair hearing and consideration, are removed or overruled by the council. Second. Mr. Carroll is not, in the proper use of lan- guage, pastor of the South Congregational Church in New Hayen, nor is he "Acting Pastor," as that term is defined by the General Association of Connecticut. Any assump- tion of the title of ])astor on his i)art is unwarranted, and the arrangements and proceedings by which he has been invested with the powers of a pastor in that (^'hurch, with- out the intervention of a council of neighboring churches to THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. 109 inquire into his qualifications for tliai oftice, are a contempt put upon tlie principle of communion of cliurclies, and a violation of the rights of the complainants. Third. The voting (»f women in the Church, by which, in the settlement of Mr. Carroll, the majority of the brethren was overruled, is contrary to the Scriptures (I. Cor. xix. 34 ; I. Tim. xi. 12) and contrary to the usages and principles of the New England churches, and invalidates the act of a majoritv, which was made such by these votes. Fourth. The refusal of the Clerk and Standing Commit- tee to call a meeting of the Church at the written request of fourteen brethren, (who were nearly one-third of the brotherhood), for the express pui-i^ose of requesting Mr. Carroll to resign his place, as provided for by the arrange- ment under which he was settled, was not only a violation of the compact, by which the question of his retirement is made at all times a proper question for consideration in the Church, whether with or without charges against his offi- cial character ; but was a gross usurpation on the part of the Clerk and Committee, alike hostile to the rights of the members and destructive of the organization of a Congre- gational Church ; and the refusal of the same functionaries to present a respectful memorial from twenty members to the Church, was a similar irregularity and wrong. The ratification of these proceedings by the annual Church meeting may justly be regarded as an additional grievance. Fifth. The brethren who had received letters of dismis- sion, but who, in a formal communication to the Church, had announced their purpose not to connect themselves with other churches, but to retain their membership in the South Church, were unjustly excluded from participation in the annual meeting of that Church, The decision of the moderator, Mr. Carroll, that they were not members, and the confirmation of that decision by the meeting, can not but be condemned as an arbitrary and unjust proceeding. Those brethren are still, according to the purport oT the testimonials which they had received, members of the South Church in regular standing. Sixth. The reasons for dissatisfaction with the ministry of Mr. Carroll, as alleged and proved by the complainants, are valid. 110 THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. 1. It is a sufficient reason for dissatisfaction with his ministry, that he was employed by the Cliurch and Society without exliibiting any proper and adequate proof of his regular standing in the ministry. 2. The sympathy of Mr. Carroll with the existing rebel- lion, exhibited as it has been, not only negatively by his not saying the things which he ought to have said, but positively, by saying what he ought not to have said against the Government, and against the struggle of the nation to defend itself, and to perpetuate the inheritance it has received from God ; his personal influence in the con- gregation, "leading captive" unthinking and unstable per- sons into outspoken sympathy with the most stupendous crime recorded in history since Christ was crucified, and his silence in regai'd to the atrocious heresy, religious and ethical, now so widely maintained, that it is right for white men to make slaves of black men, being made more signifi- cant by his endeavors to suppress in the Church all allu- sions to so great a wickedness, are sufficient grounds for formal charges against him ; and being proved on trial, are sufficient for his condemnation, if there be any ecclesiasti- cal body to which he is responsible. Such being the facts, and our judgment upon them, we are prepared to answer the questions which the complain- ants have proposed to us for our advice : First. In consideration of the facts which have appeared before this Council, and which we have already recited, we advise the complainants that the South Congregational Church, so called, ought not to be recognized any longer as a Congregational Churcli, and as a Council we advise the Churches which we represent, and all other Churches of our communion, to withhold from that Church those acts of mutual recognition and f.dlowship which are customary among Congregational Churches, and which are the form of their unity as an ecclesiastical commonwealth. Second. We advise the complainants, and as many other members of that Church as may associate with them, to withdraw from their present relations to it. And we au- thorize our Moderator and Scribe to give to them, collect- ively or individually, in our behalf, letters certifying their THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. Ill regular standing as professed followers of Christ in full communion with the Congregational Churches of Connecti- cut, and commending them to any Church with which they may choose to connect themselves, or to any ecclesiastical council which may be convened for the purpose of recog- nizing the formation of a new Church. The question whether they shall proceed to constitute a new Church in the south part of the city of Xew Haven, is a question to be determined partly by local considerations, with which they, and the members of the other Churches here, are bet- ter acquainted than this Council can be. Yet we cannot refrain from saying that, for the sake of patriotism and of pure and undefiled religion, there ought to be among the growing population of that quarter a truly Congregational Church, from which the sympathies of patriotic Christian souls may freely go up to God on the wings of prayer and praise, and in which the whole counsel of God, "revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who hold the truth in unrighteousness," shall be preached plainly and unswervingly. REV. JOSEPH ELDRIDGE, Moderator. TV. T. EusTis, Scribe. REPLY OF THE SOUTH CHURCH To THE LATE ECCLESIASTICAL COUNCIL. The following reply of the Standing Committee of the South Congregational Church, to the action of the Ex-parte Council recently held in this city, was submitted to said Church on Friday evening, Jan. 1st, 1864, and by the Church was unanimously approved, and ordered to be published. Whereas, an Ex-parte Council, representing twelve of the two hundred and twenty-two consociated Congrega- tional Churches in this State, has been lately held in New Haven, at the request of twenty petitioners, now or recently 112 THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. connected with the South Congregational Church, for the professed purpose of advising them "concerning their rights and their duty ;" and whereas, in advising them, said Council liave sat in judgment on this entire Church and upon our ministers ; and, whei'eas, the Council has given to the public its proceedings and result, which result has been telegraphed throughout the country ; we owe it to our- selves, as a Church, to Rev. Mr. Carroll, as our minister, and to truth and justice, that "Caq facts in thft case be stated and published through the same channels. As this Council has seen fit to vindicate its decision to the public, however degrading to a Church judicatory we feel such an appeal to be, we are compelled to suffer in silence, or respond before the same tribunal. The 'petitioners for the Council, members of the South Congregational Chitrch, ARE NOT, as they claim to be, "a majority of the Brethren'^ of said Church. When tiie Council was convoked, we had forty-seven male members, not including those who had taken letters of dismission. [See Church records.] Of this forty-seven, but fifteen, including absent members, were petitioners for the Council. The distinction indicated by the term "Brethren" in connection with voting, has never been sanctioned by any resolution or vote of the South Church. The right of voting by females has never been denied by the Church, and the exercise of this right obtained and was practiced prior to the llev. Mr. Carroll's coming among us. It has simply been continued, not inaugurated, during his adminis- tration. In the early part of 1861, the vote of the Church on the question of accepting llev. Mr. Noyes' resignation, (as was testified before the Council then held,) stood, — Yeas 70, Noes 5 ; total 75 ; which is a much larger number than there ever were, of males only, in the South Church. All this exposes the groundlessness of tlie assumption that this practice was introduced for the purpose of "imposing" Rev. Mr. Carroll upon tliis Church. The minority of the Church, as well as the majority, have exercised this right from that lime to the present. At a meeting of the Church, Feb. 18th, 18G3, on the question of inviting Rev. Mr. Car- roll to continue his labors among us as Stated Supply, THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. 113 females as well as males voted, without objection on the part of the Chairman, E, S. Minor, then a Deacon of the Church, and since one of the petitioners for the Council. If this was " contrary to the usages and principles of the New England Churches," why did he not interpose his authority as Chairman, to prevent its exercise ; and why did no other member raise a question of order as to the pro- priety of such a proceeding 1 When for the first time this distinction was recorded on the Church books in these words — " the majority of the Brethren voting in the nega- tive," — it was in violation of the judgment of the Church as to the rights of members, as is shown by the fact that soon after the interpolation was discovered, the Church by a unanimous vote, adopted the following resolution : ""Whereas, At a meeting of this Church held Feb. 18, 1863, a vote was passed to invite the Rev. J. Halsted Carroll to continue his minis- terial labors with this Church, said vote being recorded fifty-one yeas and twenty-two nays, with these words added, ' a majority of the brethren voting in the negative ;' and whereas, this Church has never made any distinction in its membership in regard to voting; and whereas, said vote was taken bj- ballot, with no official announcement or knowledge as to the vote of any member ; therefore, voted, that the former Clerk of this Church, John NicoU, M.D., is guilty of tampering with the records, and is hereby censured for such conduct by this Church." But passing this, what evidence did the petitioners give the Council, or has the Council given the public, that they, the petitioners, were what they claimed to be, viz : " a ma- jority of the hrethr en'' even. It is found in the caption and first paragraph of the " Result," which we quote : "Result of the Conncil called by 'the majority of the Brethren of the South . Congregational Church, Keiv Haven.^ "This Council has been convened by certain brethren styling them- selves "the majority of the brethren of the South Congregational Church in New Haven," and complaining tliat they •• have been de- prived of the rights which belong to brethren of a Congregation.il 10 114 THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. Church." Whetlier they are or aro not entitled to the rights of a ma- joritj-, is a question upon which we are not called to express an opinion, for it is not material to any of the issues involved in their complaint. These brethren, twenty or more in number, have addressed the Church in a memorial asking for a Mutual Council to consider certain matters by wliich they are aggrieved, and their request has been denied. Their right, therefore, of obtaining advice from neighbor Churches through an Ex-'parte Council, in conformity with a reasonable and long estab- lished usage of the New England Churchc.?, cannot be disputed." The evidence furnished to substantiate this claim, is thvee-fold : {a) an assertion of it : " Result of the Council called hi/ 'the Majority of the Brethren:^ " {b) a modifi- cation of it : " This Council has been convened by certain brethren 'styling themselves a majority ;' " (c) a partial abandonment of it : " Whether they are, or are not, enti- titled to the rights of a majority, is a question upon which we are not called to express an opinion ; for it is not mate- rial to any of the issues involved in their complaint." The Council may regard the question of majority or minority as immaterial ; but for important reasons, it is a point not only upon which an hitelligent and unprejudiced opinion shouUl have been formed and expressed, but formally de- cided ; for, with this claim undecided, how was it possible that the Council should know what case was before them ? And is tliis an unimportant point in the estimate of a Church Court, to know who are the parties before them ? And yet this can only be settled when this claim is settled. If these petitioners, meml)ers of our Church, be a majority, then is the Council dealing with our Church ; and in this case, because the Church has convened them and asked for advice. If, on the other hand, these "brethren" be a mi- nority, then are the Council dealing only with a few indi- viduals asking for advice, and should (lonfine their action to them. They have nothing to do with our Church — they have no jurisdiction over us — unless we, as a Church, asked for the Council, or consented to become a party to it. We say that this is the only way in which tht-y could have any legitimate right to discuss and decide upon our affairs ; for. THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. 115 we are an Independent Congregational Church, neither associated nor consociated, and as an independent Church, wliicli we ai"e and always have been, we are in this case no more amenable to this Council, nncalled by us, than a IJaptist, Methodist, or Episcopal Church would be. And the same obtains in the case of our minister. Rev. Mr. Carroll. He is not a member of the Association or Con- sociation ; but an Old School Presbyterian clergyman, "responsible" to his own brethren, and none other, — an ecclesiastical body which we regard as entirely " evangeli- cal." Did both Church and minister, or either of them, call and ask advice from this Council % Neither did. We neither asked advice, nor needed it ; for, the greater part of the minority having absented themselves from our services for some time past, we have been during this period a united and prosperous Church, — have had no difficulties to harmo- nize, no grievances to complain of. The vote of sixty-one members ratifying the action of the Standing Committee in declining even to become par- ties to this Council, was unanimous. — This being so, by what authority has this Council, representing twelve out of two hundred and twenty-two Consociated Churches in this State, arraigned, tried, condemned, and attempted to " ex- communicate" us? "Who made them judges and rulers over us, an independent Church, and over our minister, who belongs to another denomination ? It is simply imperti- nence and usurpation. " The right of obtaining advice from neighbor Churches through an Ex-par to Council in conformity with a reasonable and long established usage of the New England Churches, cannot be disputed." We do not dispute it. But when called upon by others to advise them, (which advice was conveyed in a single sentence,) we do deny that it was either necessary or right for the Council, upon a whole Church, a Church over which they had no jurisdiction, and u])on Ex-parte statements, to pronounce anathemas, and even attempt to assassinate the character of its minister. And however nmch "in conformity with a reasonable (!) and long established usage of the New England Churches," it is in manifest no«-conformity with simple Christian 116 THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. courtesy, and " contrary to the Scriptures." 1 Peter, iv : 15; 2 Thess., iii, 11. That the South Church was not before the Council, will appear from the fact that we had at the date it was called, one hundred and fifty-two members, (not including those who had taken letters of dismission.) Of these one hun- dred and fifty-two members not dismissed, forty-seven are males ; of these forty-seven males not dismissed, only fifteen signed the petition for the Council, — the other five not being recognized as members by this Church, which as an independent body, has alone the right to determme who are its members and who are not. Are fifteen a majority of forty-seven 1 Are twenty, " styling themselves a major- ity of the brethren," a majority of fifty-tliree ? which is our number of males if we include, as they do, the five peti- tioners dismissed, and one dismissed who is not a petitioner? No ! And yet they ought to have known that they were not a majority, and might have known it had they used the proper means, and thus have saved themselves this exposure. Tlius the petitioners, members of this Church, were not what they claimed to be, a majority of the brethren, much less of the membership, of the Church. '• First of all, tliis Council has made a communication to the Church through its clerk and standing committee, and also to the Rev. J. Hal- sted Carroll as another parly iuterosted in the matters referred to us, inviting them to appear andofler any explanations wliich they may de- sire to make concerning tlie transactions complained of. But these in- vitations have been explicitly declmed. "We are sorry to add, we have been denied all access to the records of the Church, and that llio com. plainants have not been able to obtain authentic copies of the records, which they desired to present for our consideration." Two facts are here stated : «' 1. llev. Mr. Carroll ' declin- ed ' to appear, and the records were ' denied.' ". Reasons : — Rev. Mr. Carroll declined because he failed to see any juris- diction over him by said Conneil, not being a member of the Association, nor a minister of their denomination, but_ a Presbyterian clergyman. The churcli declined sending its THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. 117 records or " authenticated copies " of the same, because it had decided by a unanimous vote, (61,) as stated above, not to become a party to the Council. It should be remarked, liowever, that those of the petitioners who had not been dis- missed, had free access to the records; one of whom (G. H. Butriclis,) took extracts therefrom. Having declined to ap- pear before the Council, how could we be expected to pre- sent our records, or authenticated copies thereof, and thus take away the ex-parte character of the Council I " naviiig carefully considered the documents submitted to us in be- half of the complaiutints by their Committee, and having heard such testimony as they in the disadvantageous circumstances in which they are placed have been able to adduce, we find the following matters of fact: ■' 1. The Church in question was instituted as a Congregational Church, with the advice and approbation of a conucil of Congrega- tional Ciiurehes, and the complainants became members of it, in the warranted expectation that tliey were to enjoy all the rights belonging to the brethren of a Congregational Church, according to th? princi- ples and usages of the Xew England Churches."' True, it was organized as a Congregational Church ; but never having been associated or consociated, we are an In- dependent Congregational Cliurch, — and as such, claim the right to regulate our own affairs. Several of the petitioners, one of them a Deacon, (E. S. Minor,) organized with us, and assisted in making our rules, and in creating and sanctioning our customs. Such being the case, what reason have they now to complain of those rules and customs ? Among tliese rules and customs, is the right of all mem- bers to vote. This right was acquiesced in and practically approved by the minority, in common with the majority, at the meeting in February last, already referred to — Deacon E. S. Minor, one of the petitioners, in the chair. This right is further sustained by the action of the Church in all cases of the admission of members, and has been, from the organization of the Church to this day. In every such case, after the assent of the member or members to tile covenant, the minister, speaking in behalf of the 10* lis THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. Church, and all the members rising in token of approval, says: — "Then cloth this Church atfeclionately receive you to its membership and welcome you to all the privileges, labors and blessings, of the Household of Faith." " Thus you are admitted to this Church, and have a right to all its privileges." " Then are you." Who 1 " Male members V "Adult male members'?" "Brethren?" No! You who take this covenant. Adults and youth, parents and children, male and female, all recommended by the Committee and received by the Church. "You are" — what ?" admitted to this Clnirch, and have a right to all its privileges." One of the privileges conferred upon all who take our covenant, is voting; and as an Independent Church, we claim the right of deciding not only who are our members and who are not, but also what are the privileges of our own Church conferred % the Church upon its members. "II. The Rev. J. Halsted C.'irroll commenced his labors at the South Church in December, 1861, being invited by the Societ.v's Committee to officfete as a candidate. He was soon afterwards employed by con- current votes of the Church and Society to supply the pulpit for a year. Before the terminatiou of the year, a meeting of the Church was held to consider the question of a more permanent settlement of Mr. Car- roll in the work of the ministry there. An arrangement was made, purporting to be between the Clnirch and Society as one party, and Mr. Carroll as the other party, by which he was to remain in the work of the ministry among them indefinitely, and which could be termina- ted only when either party should give four months notice of a desire for the termination." Such an arrangement not only " [)urported " to be made, but was made. Is there anything peculiar in this relation of Rev. Mr. Carroll to the South Church ? It is the same relation Rev. Dr. Stiles sustained to this Church, and Rev. Gurdon W. Noyes, durhig the early i)art of his ministry, except the " four months' notice," wliicli made it apparently a more i)ermanent relation than that of the present incum- bent. AVhy, then, should this be cited as a grievance, or as something wrong on the part of people or minister ? That notliing of a permanent or pastoral relation was THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. 119 secured by tliis arrangement, is admitted by the complain- ants themselves ; for they say, " it could be terminated at anytime by giving four months' previous notice." " III. Ill that meeting a majority of the male members present voted against the proposed arrangement, but their votes were overruled by counting the votes of female members." How did the council obtain this information ? If from the clerk, (Dr. Nicoll,) how did he obtain it? If from the other petitioners, or any of them, how did tliey obtain it ? — the vote being taken (on motion of the clerk) by " secret ballot:' " IV. The aforesaid arrangement having been made, Mr Carroll assumed the title and authority of " Pastor of the South Church " sub- scribing official papers in that character, being habitually spoken of among the members of tlie Church, and in Church meetings, by that official title, and being announced frequently to the public as Pastor of the Church." If the charge is, that Mr. Carroll assumed the title and authority of installed Pastor, we deny it. — We have called him Pastor among ourselves and in Church meetings, and announced him so to the public : but so have several of the petitioners. On one occasion, three of them, with others, addressed him as " Pastor," in a formal letter, expressing the " great pleasure and profit with which they had listened to his Tiumksgiving sermon on the claims of our country on Christians," and asking a copy for publication. The late Superintendent of the Sunday School, (Geo. S. Minor,) one of the petitioners, often announced him as Pastor. At quar- terly and anniversary meetings of the Sunday School in the Church, how familiar these words from his lips — " We will now listen to our Pastor." When thus "called" and "an- nounced" by us and them, were any of us deceived, or did we or they intend to deceive others ? No more did he, in " sub- scribing" lumself " Pastor," deceive or attempt to deceive others. The oflfense charged here, is about as formidable as tliat of addressing a man l)y the title of Esq., who is not an Esq., who himself knows he is not an Esq., and who is 120 THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. known not to be an Esq. by the party who addresses him thus. If the fact of our addressing Mr. Carroll as Pastor, be proof of Ins assuming the title and authority of Pastor, why were not his predecessors, while they sustained the same relation to this Church that he does, guilty of the same offence when addressed and eveu spoken of in print by the same title. (See Catalogue of South Church, E. S. Minor chairman of publishing committee.) '•V. Certain inembei-s of the Church, fourteen in number, being dis" satisfied with the ministry of Mr. Carroll, and desiring that notice might be duly given to him for the termination of the arrangement, presented to the Clerk of the Church their written request for a Church meeting, which request was refused by the Clerk and Standing Com- mittee. "VI. Afterwards the same brethren and others, twenty in all, ad- dressed their memorial to the Church, stating distinctly the grounds of their dissatisfaction with these proceedings and with the ministry of Mr. Carroll, and asking for a Council of the Churches, to be mutually agreed upon, who should advise witli the Church and the complain- ants. The Clerk, to whose hands the memorial was committed, refused, by the advice of the Standing Comniittee, to lay it before the Church." They did refuse. And why? (1.) Because this very question about the continuance of Rev. Mr. Carroll's labors among us, had been discussed at great jength at a Church meeting specially called for that purpo'se, not long before, and had been decided in favor of such continuance by a vote of fifty-one to twenty two. (2-) Because the regular an- nual meeting of the Church must be held in the ensuing month of November, when this whole subject could be re- discussed and re-decided. VVe admit that the literality of the rule* requires the Clerk * Note by the Author of South Church History. — After all, there was no such rule. It is not among the printed " Standing Rules" of the Church, where the duties of the Clerk are defined, nor in the manuscript records, nor any where else. The most that can truly be said is, that there was such a usage ; but eveu this was not uniform THE EX-PARTE cpUNCIL. 121 to call a meeting of the Church whenever retinested by a certain number of members But can it be supposed that in adopting- such a rule, the Church intended to make itself liable to be called together every month, week, or day, at the pleasure of the requisite number of petitioners, and thus be kept in a state of constant agitation ? If not, a reason- able discretionary power must be vested somewhere to pre- vent this abuse ] and where better than in the Standing Committee. This discretionary power our Standing Com- mittee exercised in the case before us, and their action was unanimously approved by the Church. And yet, for this irregularity i)rincipally — for this refusal under these circum- stances — we are judged by Council as no longer "to be re- cognized as a Congregational Church ;" and they feel con- strained " to advise their Churches to withhold from us acts of recognition and fpUowship, customary among New Eng- land Churches." "VII. Between the time when the request was made for a Church meeting and the time of preparing the memorial, some of the complain- ants asked and received letters of commendation, in the ordinary form, by which their membership in the Church would be terminated when- ever they might become members of other Churches. But in the me- morial those brethren gave notice to the Church, that upon mature de- liberation they had relinquished their intention of connecting them- selves with other Churches ; and they remained, in the language of the testimonials which had been given them, 'members of the South Congrcgatioual Church.' " Answer. — "Members of the SouthCongregatioualChurch." Why did the Council omit the next clause 1 viz : " and are hereby dismissed at their own request." The fact that those brethren gave notice to the Church that " they had relinquished their intention of connecting themselves with nor well defined. Very often Church meetings were called by a simple announcement from the pulpit, without the intervention of the Clerk at all. There is now a recorded Rule, adopted at the annual meeting of the Church, Nov. 24, 1S63, as follows: " Voted, That the power to call a Churffh meeting for business, shall rest in the Church Committee, together with the Clerk." 122 THE EX-FARTE COUNCIL. Other Cliurclies," did not make them remain, "in the lan- guage of the testimonials," •' members of the South Con- gregational Church,"* but members " dismissed." Besides, a simple "notification" tons, by those dismissed, "that they did not intend to present their certificates to other Churches," did not release them from the necessity of pre- senting them to our Church for re-admission ; for our cus- tom and usage is, and ever has been, when members hold certificates from us which have not been presented else- where, if such parties desire to return to us, their certifi- cates must be acted upon by the Church. This was, and is, our custom. Have any of the petitioners holding cer- tificates of dismission from us, conformed to our custom in this matter ? No. They have never returned their certifi- cates to the Church, but still retain them, claiming full membership, while carrying about with them the testimo- nials that they are dismissed from us. Why, then, should we make them exceptions to our rule ? Why should we recognize them as in full membership upon a "notification," when others have never been so recognized in like circum- stances ? Are we, as a Church, bound by this, their new * Note by the Author of South Church History.— The argu- ment drawn from the language of the certificates of dismission, is just as good and no better than would lie that of an officer who had been dismissed from the service of the United States by a Court Martial, but who should claim that by the very langunge of that order, he still held his posilioa in the regiment. AVe will suppose the order to read as follows: '•Decision of Court Martial, Xo 52.— Ordered, tliat A. B., First Lien- tenant of Company 11, ninety-eleventh regiment U.S. Artillery, be, and he is hereby, di.smissed from tlie service in disgrace." If such an officer should appeal to the language of tlie order, in proof that he had not been dismissed, wiio could gain-say his plea ? Does not the order itself speak of liim expressly as '' First Lieutenant of Company II, ninety-eleventh regiment of U. S. Artillery ?" How then can he be otherwise. If the Court Martial wliich dismissed him, is not good authority in his favar, who or what is ? And yet this flimsy argument is endorsed by the Council I THE EX-rARTE COUNCIL. 123 claim 1 Further, this custom has recently been recognized and ratified by the formal action of our Church at its last annual meeting. It was decided in the case of George S. Minor,* claiming this right for the first time in our history, * Note Br the Author of South Church History. — That he intendod to ask for an absohite dismission, is evident from tlie lan- guage of his apiilication, as follows : "New Haven, Jnly 19, 1863. '■ To the Clerk of the Soutli Congregational Church. — ^•Dear Sir: Feeling it a duty to dissolve my connection with this Church, I respectfully ask througli you, of tlien;, a letter of dismission, with a certificate of Christian character, and recommendation to any Church of Christ to which by God I may be directed to hold fellowship and communion. Yerv respectfully, GEORGE S. MINOR." "We have before us the requests of several other persons who applied for general letters of dismission about the same time with the above. The following is a copy of Deacon Minor's application. "New H.wex, July 22, 1863. " To tlie South Congregational Church. — " Dear Brethren : — Feeling that I cannot with satisfaction to myself and advantage to the Chiircii, retain connection witli it while under its present circimistances, 1 respectfully ask for a letter of dismission and recommendation to whatever Cliurch I may wish to connect myself. Respectfully yours, E. S. MINOR." After reading these requests, and others life them, can there be a doubt what was the intention and wish of the applicants? They felt it a "duty" to separate themselves from the South Church and the South Church granted their request. Neither party, it is safe to say, had at thai time the slightest idea of any further ecclesiastical coimec- tion with eacli other. If Paul and Barnabas, after "shaking off the dust of their feet against" the sinners of Antioch, had subsequently returned and claimed it as thoir property, and demanded to have it put back upon their feet, the Antiochans would have been liardly more surprised than were the South Church people at the claim of their dis- missed members to to be still members of that Cliurch in full, entitled to speak and vote in their meetings, the same as if they had not been dismissed. And yet the Council sustains this claim. 124 THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. by a vote of sixty-one to one, (see Church records,) that those members who had taken letters of dismission, though not presented to other Churches, while entitled to " occa- sional communion," are not entitled to vote; and as an independent Church we have the right not only to make our own rules for our government, but the right of interpreting them also. This rule and interpretation is not unusual. It is endorsed by Dr. Dwight, President of Yale College, (see 4 vol. Theo. p. 320,) where the fact is stated that " Persons are not unfrequently dismissed from particular Churches in good standing and with full recommendation of their Christ- ian character. Tliese persons are certainly not members of any particular Church or Churches, until they are sever- ally united to other Churches in form. It is plain that they can act no where as members of the Church of Christ, except in what is called occasional communion." Again, this rule of ours is not. " contrary to the principles and usa- ges of the New England Churches," if the Center Church, of which Rev. Dr. Bacon is pastor, conforms to those "principles and usages." Among the standing rules of that Church we find the following : "Every membar of this Cliiirch shall be considered as under tlie watch, care and discipline of this Church, until he shall have been reg- nh^rl}' dismissed from his connection with it by a vote of this Church." This clearly implies that wheyi regularly dismissed by a vote of the church, he is no longer under its watch, care and discipline. Would a person having been thus dis- xnissed — not even under its " watch, care and discipline," — be still considered a member of that Cliurch, and entitled to vote 'on questions l)efore it 1 And this is the case of the complainants before the Council against the South Church. They have been "regularly dismissed by a vote of the Church," and have received letters certifying that fxict; therefore, according to the decision of our Church, they are no longer members of it in such a sense as to be entitled to vote. Wherein, then, does our course diiJer from what necessarily would be the course of the Center Church under similar circumstances ? And yet that Church is a THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. 125 constituent part of a Council which condemns us for the same action its own rule requires. "VIII. The reply which tho Clerk, by the direction of the Standing Committee, returned to the signers of the memorial, was addressed 'To Amos Smith, G. H. Butricks, and as many other signers of the above named request as are still recognized members of the Church;' the said Clerk and Committee thereby assuming to exclude from mem- bership those signers who held at that moment the written testimo- nials of the Church to their good and regular standing." And why should they not exclude them? They had heen regularly dismissed by a vote of the Church, and nei- ther the Clerk nor Standing Committee, nor both together, had power to reinstate them. The Church only could do this. The case of Amos Smith, one of the petitioners, illustrates this point. Some years since, having taken a letter of dismission, he did not present it to any other Church, but on his return to this city, he expressed a desire to renew his former connection with this Church, and was received accordingly by a vote of the Church, to which he returned his certificate of dismission. " IX. At the annual meeting of the Church, held in the evening of Nov. 24, '63, Mr. Carroll, acting as moderator, denied to the members above mentioned the right of voting, or of speaking in defense of their right to vote ; and that denial was approved by the meeting. The same meeting ratified all the doings of the Committee, including their suppression of the memorial." Only one of the persons alluded to, (Geo. S. Minor,) was present at the annual meeting, and as lie was not recognized by the custom and rule of the Church as a member, of course he could not be allowed to take part in the proceedings. " X. The reasons for the dissatisfaction with the ministry of Mr. Car- roll, presented to us by the complainants, and sustained by such evi- dence as tho nature of this investigation has made practicable, are the following: " 1. They had, at the time of his settlement, no proper evidence that ho was an ordained minister of the Gospel in regular communion with 11 126 THE EX-PAllTE COUNCIL. the Congreji-atioiial Churches and ministers of Connecticut, or with any evangehcal denomination." ^\Tiy did the complainants have no proper evidence that Mr. Carroll was a minister in regular communion with any evangelical denomination 1 Simply because the complain- ants, for reasons l)est known to themselves, never asked him, or they would have had proper evidence that he was an ordained Minister of the Gospel in regular communion with the Old School Presbyterian denomination, — a gradu- ate of Princeton Theological Seminary in the class of 1855, ordained and installed in the Presbyterian Church at Jamesburg, N. J., May 30th, in the same year, by the Presbytery of New Brunswick. Rev. Dr. Hall, of Tren- ton, N. J., preached the sermon ; Eev. Dr. Hodge, of Prince- ton, N. J., proposed the constitutional questions ; Rev. Prof. Green, of Princeton, delivered the charge to the Pas- tor ; and Rev. Dr. McDonald, of Princeton, delivered the charge to the people. [See records and roll of the New Brunswick Presbytery.] " 2. Uniler his ministry, tliere lias been in tlie pubUe worsliip of that Ciuirch, and in the lessons from the pulpit, no utterance of symyathy with our country in its struggle for unity and life; no expression of loyal desire for the success of the Government, or the defeat of the rebellion; no word implying that the attempt of the rebels to subvert by force the Government ordained by God in this land, is criminal; no recognition of the riglitcousness of the cause in which sons and broth- ers of the complainants, some of tlaem members of the same Church, are offering their hves." Is it not extraordinary that under such influences the friends of Mr. Carroll in the South Church and congregation have sent quite as many men to engage in tiie service of their country as have the petitioners and their friends in the same Church and congregation ? At least thirteen of the former class are or liavo been in that service by voluntary enlistment— most of tliem for a period of three years. Is it not strange that the Council should make such statements as those above quoted, in the face of such facts as we have presented, and of such " utterances " as are expressed in the THE EX-PAKTE COUNCIL. 127 subjoined extract of a letter dated Nov. 3d, 1862, from Mr. Carroll to Mr. E. S. ]\[inor, one of llie petitioners to the Council, who, at the above-mentioned date, was a deacon in this Church. This letter has been in his possession more than a year : " I i)ray for our rulers. This I do every Sabbath ; that God would endue them with his Holy Spirit ; give them wisdom from aljove, which is alone protitable to direct ; crown with His blessing and success their every effort which shall secure the real good of the land, thereby effecting His own purposes in it and concerning it, and redeeming them thus from narrow, groveling views. I pray for the soldiers; this I do every Sabbath ; that God would encamp round about them ; that he would preserve them in body and soul, in health and morals, in all their interests for time and eter- nity ; and for tlieir families and friends as well ; and for Peace, in Clod's own way, (and His ways are not our ways ;) for Peace in God's way of thinking — purposely, therefore, ' shutting out of view the great principles 7ce think involved,' (inasmuch as God's thoughts are not as our thoughts ;) for Peace, which if God sends, must be righteous and ' free from crime.' I pray for the country; I do this every Sab- bath ; that God would pity her and interpose in her behalf, so that she may no longer be made one vast Golgotha, but the land of Immanuel. It is not enough that I thus recog- nize Government as an institution of God, and the ' powers that be, as ordained of God,' — no ! but because in holiest approach unto the Most High, I do not advocate a certain policy ;— because before the throne of God I do not intone the Shibboleth of a party." ''3. In the pulpit and in private conversation he has characterized the action of the Government as tj^rannical and unjust, and has implied that the attempt of the Government to maintain itself by force against the rebellion, is criminal ; and when members of the church have cour- teously inquired of him concerning his views, that they might know whether he had been misunderstood on these points, he has refused to giv€*any satisfactory answer." Mr. Carroll has characterized a certain action of the Government as "tyrannical and unjust." This Mr. Carroll 128 THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. did. How, and when? It was in connection with the case of John Nicoll, M.D., one of the petitioners, then an officer and member of our Church, and about the time when he was summarily taken to Fort Lafayette. His home was broken — his practice interrupted — his reputation as an hon- est man suifering — his character as a Christian clouded — and believing him innocent, with no opportunity to prove it, and thus save himself and family — it was under these cir- cumstances and in his case, that Mr. Carroll said the action of the Government was "tyrannical and unjust," and "in the pulpit " prayed for his speedy deliverance and return. And when he did return, 7ic prayed what Mr. Carroll had said, a?id more; that they might be put out of power. Pi-oof — an entire prayer meeting. Now, which was most " disloyal ; " to say what Mr. Carroll said, or to pray what Dr. Nicoll prayed % And yet the one who prayed thus in our meeting, is one of the aggrieved " brethren " before the Council, whose patriotism and piety are shocked by Mr. Carroll's prayers. "4. He has borne no testimouy against the wicked doctrine of these times, that it is right for white men to make slaves of black men; but on the contrary, he has used his influence to suppress in the meetings of the Church all allusions to the injustice of slavery." True, Mr. Carroll does not preach or pray abolitionism, or any other " ism." If he has used his influence to suppress "in the meetings of the Church all allusions to the injustice of slavery," he has not been very successful, at least in the case of several of the petitioners. "5. He has by his private and public influence brought certain young persons of the congregation into open sympathy with the existing rebellion." Who these " certain young persons of the congregation " are, as a Church we do not know ; and if there be any, Mr. C. could not have made them such. Even the petitioners virtually confess this; for they assert that " when members of the Church have courteously inquired of him concerning THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. 129 his views, tliat they miglit know whether he had been mis- understootl on these points, he has refused to give any sat- isfactory answer." The question may fairly he raised, whether, instead of being brought to tliat position through the influence of Mr. Carroll, it has not been caused by the indiscreet zeal of parents and friends. JUDGMENT OF THE COUNCIL. " These being the facts (!) as we find them," say the Council, "our judgment is," [here follow six conclusions, based upon the alleged facts,] To answer the conclusions in detail, would be to answer the " facts " over again. This we need not do. We will, however, say a few words on two of the conclusions, in addition to what has been said above on the same topics. "Second. Mr. Carroll is not, in the proper use of language, pastor of the South Congregational Church in New Haven, nor is he ' Acting Pastor,' as that term is defined by the General Association of Con- necticut. Any assumption of the title of pastor on his part is unwar- ranted, and the arrangements and proceedings by which he has been invested with the powers of a pastor in that Church, without the inter- vention of a council of neighboring churches to inquire into his qualifi- cations for that office, are a contempt put upon the principle of com- munion of churches, and a violation of the rights of the complainants." The last Annual Report of the General Association of Connecticut, m its tabular statements, p. 83, has the fol- lowing entry opposite South Church : "J. Halsted Carroll, (A. p.)" Acting Pastor. If, however, the Council rest their assertion upon a report submitted by Dr. Bacon "^for examination" and contained in said Annual Report, Mr. Carroll is neither " Acting Pas- tor," "Pastor," nor " Stated Preacher" of this Church, nor indeed sustains any relation to it, but ''may reasonahly he' regarded with suspicion." Suspicion ? Why ? Simply because ^[r. Carroll "insists upon retaining his Church relation and clerical connection " " with his own ecclesias- tical body." 11* 130 THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. "Third. The voting of women in the Church, by which, in the settle- ment of Mr. Carroll, the majority of the brethren was overruled, is contrary to the Scriptures (I. Cor. xix. 34; I. Tim. xi. 12;) and contrary to the usages and principles of the New England Churches, and invali- dates the act of a majority, which was made such b)- these votes." The assertion here is, that it is wrong for women to vote : (1) Because "contrary to the Scriptures." There are no such " Scriptures " as those above-quoted, nor any others denying the right of women to vote in Churches. (2) " Because contrary to the usages and principles of the New England Churches." But not to those of our indepejident Church. (3) That it " invalidates the act of a majority." It might so in a consociated (Church, but not in ours, which being an independent Church, has a right to establish its own rules as well in regard to voting as to other things. ADVICE OF THE COU.NCIL. " First. In consideration of the facts wliich have appeared before this Council, and which we have already recited, we advise the complain- ants that the South Congregational Church, so called, ought not to bo recognized any longer as a Congregational Church, and as a Council we advise the Churches which we represent, and all other Churches of our communion, to withhold from that Cliurch those acts of mutual recognition and fellowship which are customary among Congregational Churches, and which are the form of their unity as an ecclesiastical commonwealth." Thus far in our history, acts of " recognition and fellow- ship " toward us on the ])artofthe Churches represented iu the Council, have been few and far between. Whether the action of Council will make them fewer hereafter, remains to be seen. At present we are unable to appreciate our loss. " Secondly. "Wo advise the complainants, and as many other members of that Church as may associate with them, to wltlidraw from their present relations to it. And we authorize our Moderator and Scribe to give to them, collectively or individually, in our behalf, letters certi- THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. 131 fying their regular standing as professed followers of Christ in full communiou with the Congregational Churches of Connecticut, and commending them to any Church with which they may choose to con- nect themselves, or to any ecclesiastical Council which may be con- vened for the purpose of recognizing the formation of a new Church. The question whether they shall proceed to constitute a new Church in the south part of the city of New Haven, is a question to be deter- mined partly by local considerations, with which they, and the mem- bers of the other Churches here, are better acquainted than this Coun- cil can be. Yet we cannot refrain from saying, that for the sake of patriotism and of pure and undefiled religion, there ought to be among the growing population of that quarter a truly Congregational Charch, from which the sympathies of patriotic Christian souls may freely go up to God on the wings of prayer and praise, and in which the whole counsel of God, "revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and uurighteousuess of men who hold the truth in unrighteousness," shall be preached plainly and unswervingly. " Signed in behalf and by direction of the Council. "REV. JOSEPH ELDRIDGE. Moderator. "Ret. TV. T. ErsTis, Scribe." In this second and last paragraph of advice, the Council recommend (1) that the complainants and such as sympa- thize with them, " withdraw from their present relations " to us. In this recommendation we cordially concur. (2) A modest intimation that they proceed to constitute a new Church in the south (this) part of the city. Reasons, — con- siderations of "patriotism" and of "pure and undefiled religion." If " pure and undefiled religion before God and the Father" is this, "to visit the widow and fatherless in their affliction, and to keep ourselves unspotted from the world," this we have humbly tried to do, not only positively but negatively ; our Church, by refusing to convert itself into a political machine, and our minister, by refusing to preach or pray politics. In what respect are the patriotism and piety of the pro- posed new Church to differ from ours, as above described] But without pressing this question, we are inclined to hope that the recommendation of the Council to build a new Church will also be complied with, and that the old and wealthy Churches here will give it a liberal support. 132 THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. It is likewise insinuated against Rev. Mr. Carroll, that he has been unfaitliful as a minister, ''failing to declare the whole coxinscl of God." What is the evidence the Council furnish the public upon which they made, and made public, this fearful charge against Mr. Carroll, as recreant to his official duties and faithless as a minister of God ? None whatever. And they not only pronounce sentence upon him on the strength of ex-jmrte statements, but upon him, though beyond their jurisdiction, and amenable to another denomi- nation. But the best refutation of this slander is the simple record of his ministry. What is the record of the year just closed, from January, 1S63, to January, 1864? Our con- gregations on the Sabbath, and at weekly meetings, have never before been uniformly so large, in our history of eleven years, except during a short period under the minis- try of Uev. Dr. Stiles; while the additions to our Church membership have been 43 — a larger number than in any year of the previous nine years. Comparing this accession with that of other Churches duiing the year ]862, as recorded in the minutes of the General Association of Con- necticut, we find more fruits from his labors, and larger accessions of members, than in the ministry and Churches represented in the Council who condemned him and us as unfaithful. Of the 284 Congregational Churches in the State, (222 consociated, and 62 independent,) only two had so large an accession. If these be indications of infidelity to duty and to God, we pray they may abound ; that as a Church we may be " steadfast, unmovable, always abounding in the work of the Lord ; " and that as a minister, Mr. Carroll may continue to refuse to promulgate for doctrines of Christ " the com- mandments of men," and may continue to know nothing among ?ursuance of their ob- ject. No other course, therefore, seemed open to them, but the one they have taken. 134 THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL, The petitioners, of course, are not to be lield responsible for the action and finding of the Council, yet the unanimous judgment of the men who constituted that body, represent- ing Churches in every part of the State, will scarcely be over-ruled in the opinion of thoughtful and impartial minds, by the assertions of those who refused to submit the case to a tribunal, half of whose members they were at liberty to select. The petitioners did not claim before the Council that the names signed to tiie Memorial were a majority of the breth- ren of the Church, but that they represented a majority of them. This claim was grounded on the following facts, viz : — Mr. Carroll's official returns to the General Associa- tion of Connecticut, state the number of male members, January 1st, 1863, to be 44. The petitioners knew ot but six male members who had since been received up to the date of their memorial, making the whole number 50 ; six or more had been dismissed and imited with other Churches within the same period, leaving the number of male mem- bers at 44, — and they know that 26, including the memo- rialists, sympathized with them. If then, the official returns to the Association were correct, the number the petitioners claimed to represent, was a majority. It may be proper to add a word to illustrate the views of some of the members of the Standing Committee as to the treatment which an unquestioned majority might expect to receive from the "rw^w^^jower*" of this Church. One of the petitioners in conversation with a member of the Com- mittee, declared his belief, that if a Church meeting was called, and the subject fairly considered of requesting Mr. Carroll to tender his resignation, two to one would be in favor of the motion; and furthermore he offered if his state- ment was doubted, to give the names of those who he had reason to believe would vote for it. The reply was in substance, that it would make no differ- ence if even three fourths of the members were in favor of the motion; so long as Mr. llallock wished Mr. Carroll to stay, ho xcouhl stay, and they could not help themselves. It hasbeen often admitted by members of the Committee and others, that while the Church is sustained as it now is, THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. 135 almost entirely by tlie contributions of o?ie man, his wishes would have paramount weight, and the self-governing power of the Church be virtually abrogated. It is said that " those of the petitioners who had not been dismissed, had free access to the records." In reply to this, one of the petitioners who has not been dismissed, affirms that he applied for an inspection of the records and was denied by the Clerk. One of the petitioners is informed for the Jirst time by this document, that censure has been passed upon him by the Church ; which it is understood was voted at the close of the prayer meeting Dec. 2^th, 1863, (barely in time to be used in the reply of the Committee of the Church,) and without any summons to the accused, who was condemned without a hearing. Considering that this brother is one of those who received letters of dismission and over whom this Church has declared itself to have no control, it must be acknowledged that their action in the case vindicates the position which they claim for themselves, of being an ''Inde- pendent Congregational Cliurck''' This brother would state that the fact which he noted in the records, was derived from the public declarations of a majority of the brethren in the meeting, both as it respected their opinion, and their votes; and it being the duty of the Clerk to note all matters of interest to the Church, this fact was duly recorded. In relation to one of the special grievances of the peti- tioners, the deprivation of their rights by the Committee, — the latter justify their action in refusing to call a Church meeting upon the request of a sufficient number of members, by the assertion, that the subject of ]Mr. Carroll's ministra- tions over the Church had been sufficiently discussed at a recent Church meeting, and "the annual meeting must be held in the ensuing montli of November,'" when the whole matter could be rediscussed and redecided. In reply the petitioners would state that Rev. Mr. Carroll is settled for an indefinite period, and in order to dismiss him it is required that four months notice be given, and this was their object in requesting the meeting. It was nearly four months before the "annual meeting" to which they refer, would be held. It is true that the subject had been discussed at a 136 THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. previous meeting and declared to be settled by a decisive vote, but in the mean time matters had assumed a diflferent aspect. Mr. Carroll's summary silencing of tlie bell while ringing for the victory at Vicksburg, had induced many who had before been his supporters, to believe that he was not a loyal man, and they were ready to unite in the call for his dismissal. It was under these circumstances that the Standing Committee assumed their "discretionary powers," and standing between Mr. Carroll and the Church, refused to allow the latter to pronounce its judgment, which it is nearly certain would have condemned him. But the Com- mittee went further than this. The petitioners addressed a respectful memorial to the Church (in the customary form) requesting them to unite in calling a Mutual Council to advise in regard to our respective duties. This memorial the Committee suiypres'icil, — refusing to allow it to come before the Church for their decision. In this they claim they exercised a reasonable discretionary power, which nuist be vested somewhere to prevent the constant agitation of the Church. The rule of the Church under which this Committee are appointed, and act, makes no mention of sucli discretionary power, but on the contrary implicitly forbids it by prescribing their special duties, and ends by stating that they shall attend to such other matters as may be referred to them by the Church. As the call for a meeting, and the memorial, had never been referred to them by the Church, it is clear that they had no discretionary power in the matter, but assumed a power without right or authority. Upon the question of female voting — The Committee say " that the right of voting by females has never been denied by the Church." Very true ; neither has the right been affirmed by the Church, which would seem necessary, as the custom of Congregational Churches forbids tlie practice. It was the usual practice in the Church to vote by raising of hands, excepting in the case of officers wlio were elected by ballot, and female votes were rarely oft'ercd or counted. No instance is known in which females voted by ballot previous to the meeting when Mr. Carroll was settled by female votes. At that meeting some of the females had such an expansive idea of their THE EX-PAETE COUNCIL. 137 rights that they not only voted themselves, but also depos- ited votes for absent friends, thereby showing what irregu- larities are liivcly to prevail on exciting occasions, if the practice of female voting obtains. But the Committee have endeavored to strengthen their position by an argument from the covenant, wlwch as they claim, by giving every member all the privileges of the Church, must necessarily give to females the right of voting. This argument proves, if anything, that females have the right of being appointed deacons, acting upon Committees, the right of discussion in business meetings, and of prayer and exhortation in prayer meetings. The right of perform- ing these actions is granted by the covenant as well as the right to vote, and has never been denied by the Church. We hardly think the Committee would be prepared to fol- low out this argument to its logical conclusion. Mr. Carroll's " utterances" in a certain letter addressed to one of the petitioners, are brought forward in this reply, to disprove the imputation of his disloyalty. As it is im- plied that this letter was withheld from the Council, it is due to this brother, as well as to Mr. Carroll, to state that Mr. Carroll's whole letter was read to the Council, and he has received all the advantage he could derive from having these utterances of his laid before them. That the public may understand the reasonableness of the demand which the petitioners make in relation to this point, the following extract from the rejoinder to Mr. Car- roll's letter is here given. "I know of no one in our Church who desires to have • party politics' either preached or prayed in the pulpit. I know of no one who wishes the 'Shibboleth of a party intoned in prayer,' but I do know of many whose loyal, not PARTiZAN, feelings crave at least this concession, viz : a decisive reprobatiox of the rebellion, and a decisive ap- probation of the Government in its efforts to maintain its own integrity. '*Thoy crave an admission that the cause to which their fathers, sons, and husbands, and brothers have freely devoted their lives, is a just and worthy cause. I do not see how this can be construed into partizan politics, unless the partizans are secessionists on the one band and loy- 12 138 THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL, ALiSTS on the other ; for men of all the late acknowledged parties, and religionists of every persuasion, are found UNITED ON THIS PLATFORM. Neither do I know or believe that this concession to the feelings of our members would give offense to any one, or produce any division among our people." . What Is* there in this demand that is either unreasonable or unchristian ? The petitioners would also reaffirm what has been sus- tained by the signatures of some forty names of persons who are or have been members of the South Church, that "it is not known to us that either in preaching, prayer or conversation, Mr. Carroll has ever admitted that the rebel- lion of the South against the Government of the United States is criminal, or that he has ever expressed a wish or a prayer for the success of our armies over the rebels, or for the re-establishment of the Union over the rebellious States, or that he has ever expressed in public a word of thanksgiving for any victories or successes obtained by our armies. Is there another minister of any denomination in this city or in the State, of whom this can be said 1 Allusion is made to disloyal sentiments said to have been uttered in prayer by one of the petitioners who had been unjustly imprisoned in Fort Lafayette. It is true that Dr. Nicoll, while smarting under the wrong inflicted by an abuse of power, the proper use of which he has never questioned, did pray that those who trifled with and misused the power with which they were entrusted by God, might be removed from places of authority; and it is also true, (which the Standing Committee neglected to mention,) that in the same prayer he did earnestly pray for the overthrow of the rebellion, and for the freedom of the oppressed. '^I'his reply intimates that in but one instance Mr. Carroll has characterized the action of the Government as " tyran- nical and unjust." It was stated Ijcforo Ihe Council, that at the breaking out of the rebellion his outspoken sympathy with the traitors compelled him to leave a hotel in a neighboring city, bo- cause the guests would not endure the presence of one so disloyal. THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. 139 It was also stated that he had declared in effect, that were it not for personal considerations, he would go south of Mason and Dixon's line and share the fortune of the rebellion, with which cause he was one at heart. Has Mr. Carroll forgotten the language he used in public prayer on the morning of the Lord's Day wiieu the news came of the battle before Fredericksburg 'i Certainly those well-considered sentences condemning the war can not have slipped his memory, since he expressed to one of our num- ber a regret that he was absent, and did not hear the " talt. prayixg" in the forenoon. In the matter of loyalty claimed for the friends of Mr. Carroll — this has not been denied. It is the persistent efforts and determination of a few who hold the power, to foist and fix in the pastorate of the Church a man whom they believe to be disloyal, of which the petitioners com- plain. Of the soldiers who have gone from the Church into the army, we know of but one or two who have ever acknowledged that they had received a word of sympathy and encouragement from Mr. Carroll, in regard to their DUTIES AS .SOLDIERS. Will the Congregation ever forget the deep disappointment that was felt at the character of the services when soldiers from the 15th Regiment were present, by special invitation, to hear their minister's part- ing counsel ? The Standing Committee claim that, under the ministra- tions of Mr. Carroll, the congregation has been larger than before ; while the additions to the Church, within the year just closed, have been forty-three — "a larger number than in any year of the previous nine years." To this it may be replied, that at least seventy mem- bers, including the petitioners, have left during the year, or are ready to leave the Church when another place of wor- ship shall be provided, because of their dislike to Mr. Car- roll's ministrations : and that in the year 1857 the number of members admitted to the Church was forty-seven. It may be stated for the information of those interested in our object, that already a larger sum has been pledged by i)ersons in the vicinity of the South Church to support the preaching of the Gospel, in case a new Church is formed, than has ever been raised in one year by that Church for 140 THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL, the same purpose, aside from the contributions of one indi- vidual ; and that if those who are friendly to their object will provide them with a suitable buikling, the petitioners will have no occasion to depend upon the contributions of the old and wealthy Churches. Whether in view of the foregoing facts the complainants were wrong in asking to be heard in the Church ; and when tliat was forbidden, in a private conference ; and when that was declined, in seeking for a Mutual Council; and when that was denied, in calling for an Ex-parte Coun- cil — the public will determine. In behalf of the Petitioners. SOUTH CHURCH,— AGAIN. Remarks on the "Rejoinder." Messrs. Editors : — As the Standing Committee of the South Church have not seen lit to reply to the " Rejoinder" of the petitioners for an Ex-parte Council, and as the peti- tioners miglit deem themselves slighted if their production was wholly passed over in silence, permit a member of said Church, not belonging to the Standing Committee, to oifer a few words by way of comment. He will be best under- stood liy quoting brief extracts from the " R(*joinder," and then adding his own remarks. The petitioners say : " On consulting as to the best moans of providing ;i place of worship more congenial to their views of duty, they were advised that a Coun- cil convened to form a new Church, would have, as'one of its first duties, to inquire into the reasons for their leaving the South Church." So this Ex parte Council was itself the result of counsel ; and, although called ostensibly to consider the expediency of forming a new Church, was mainly designed, at least l)y the "advisers," for another purpose, viz : to get a dig at the South Church. [We had no doul)t that such was the fact, but did not expect the petitioners to confess it.] Accordingly the discussion and finding of the Council in re- gard to tlie South Churcii occupy almost the whole extent of their " Result," as given to the public, while in regard to THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. 141 the formation of a new Church they have said very little, and that little of a very indefinite character. Who these " advisers " were, may be safely inferred from an inspection of the roll of Council. That several of them had long been aching for a chance to whip the South Church into their Abolition traces, was well understood by members of that Church ; who, while they would do nothing intentionally to invite or provoke such interference, were not disposed to purchase exemption therefrom by the surrender of their just rights as an Independent Congregational Church. But leaving what we have further to say on the subject of the Council, and of Councils generally, to the closing part of this article, we pass to another extract from the petitioners' Rejoinder : '•The petitioners of course, are not to bo held responsible for the action and finding of the Council." "Why not ? Was not the Council a thing of their own creating % Did not its decisions rest mainly on their own assertions ? To this extent they are responsible for " the finding and action of the Council ;" and they wi.l not be permitted to escape from that responsibility by throwing the whole burden upon the shoulders of men who have as much as they can carry, with all the help the petitioners can give them. Do the petitioners mean to repudiate the action of their own Council ? Besides the slur above indi- cated, one of them has applied to the South Church for a letter of dismission and received it, since the meeting of the Council, notwithstanding the generous offer of the latter body to give them letters of jts own, thus usurping or superseding the powers of tlie Church in that matter. But it seems that at least o\e of the petitioners prefers to re- ceive his credentials from the Church, although resting under the ban of the Council, rather than from the Council itself. We commend the wisdom of his course. '■ The peiitioncrs did not cUiim boforo the Council that liie n.-mu-a signed to the Memorial vicrc a majority of the brethren of the Chinch, but that thev represented a majority of them." 12* 142 THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. Hear the Council on this head : " This Council lias been convened by certain brotliren styling THEM- SELVES the majority of the brethren of the South Congregational Church in New Haven." Which shall we helieve, — the petitioners ? — or the Coun- cil? " This claim [of a majority of the male members] was grounded on the following facts, viz : — Mr. Carroll's official returns to the General Association of Connecticut, state the number of male members, Janu- ary 1st, 18C3, to be 44. The petitioners knew of but six male mem- bers who had since been received up to the date of their memorial, making the whole number 50 ; six or more had been dismissed and united with other Churches within the same i>eriod, leaving the num- ber of male members at 44, — and they know that 26, including the memorialists, sj'mpathizcd with them." " Mr. Carroll's official returns." These returns were fur- nished to Mr. Carroll by Deacon Minor, who is therefore responsible for their correctness. They state the number oi male members of the South Church on the 1st of Janu- ary, 1863, at 44. The petitioners say they " knew of but six male members who had since been received, up to the date of their memorial."* Now, the fact is, that ticelve male members had since been received, viz : — On the 4th of Jan- uary, 2; 1st of March, 4; 3d of May, 4; 5th of July, 2. Total, 12,t This shows how careless the petitioners are about their figures. They count but six when there are twelve. Add 12 to 44, andjt makes 50, instead of 50, does it not? From 56, then, deduct 6 who they say had been dismissed and united with other Churches, (we know of but * Following the petitioners, we shall hereafter speak of the memo- rial as if dated at the time it was presented ; say about the last of October. Strictly speaking, it is not dated at all. But the Clerk's reply to it is dated Xov. 3d. f The namo.i arc before us, and can easily bo had by the petitioners, if wantod. THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. 143 five who had united with other Churches, — certainly there were not more than six,) and it leaves 50 male members at the date of the memorial. Of these they claim 26,— the least possible majority, — including six si/mpathiscrs. These sympathisers, we suspect, are a very uncertain reliance ; for, if it had been possible by solicitations and entreaties to get their names upon the memorial, we need not say that it would have been done. Now, if a single individual of the six claimed as sympathisers, is not so in fact, then, according to their own showing, after correcting a single blunder as above, (which they cannot and will not deny to bo such,) they have not a majority of the brethren, and do not even repkese.nt a majority. Observe further, that among the signers and sympathisers are included six who had been dismissed from the Church by general letter. Deduct these from the whole numl)er of male members (50) as above, at the date of the memorial, and also from the 26 claimed by the petitioners, and it leaves 20 signers and sympathisers, out of a total of 44 male members ; being three less than a majority. We have thus carried out the calculation of the petitioners, after making the single cor- rection above mentioned — from which it appears that in or- der to show even the smallest possible majority, they are obliged to assume : 1st, That tliere were only 44 male members on the 1st of January, 1863, which is contrary to the fact. 2d, That members dismissed by general letter are still members in full, and entitled to the privilege of voting; which is contrary to the fact, at least in the South Church. 3d, That six members sympathize with the peti- tioners who cannot be induced to sign their paper. 4th, In order to make these assumptions available to their purpose, they are obliged further to assume that only male members have a right to vote ; which is contrary to the fact, at least in the South Church. Upon the validity of these assump- tions, all of which are fallacious, rests the only shadow of a claim which the petitioners had, to represent the South Church before the Council. A careful examination of the records shows that instead of 44 male members on the 1st of January, 1S63, as reported by Deacon Minor to Mr. Carroll, and by the latter to the General Association of Connecticut, there were in fact 144 THE p:x-pakte council. FIFTY male members at that date, kxclusive of two, who, with their families, had been for a considerable period absent from the city, and whose present residence w^as, and is, to the Church unknown. Between the 1st of January, 1863, and the date of the petitioners' memorial, twelve male members were added by letter or profession, and sixteen dismissed, viz : 5 by letter to other Churches, 8 by general letter, 1 by discipline, and 2 by death. Leaving at the date of the memorial, forty-six male members, exclusive of the two above mentioned. If these two were included, it would make 48. But call it 46. Of the eight dismissed by gen- eral letter, five are signers of the memorial ; two are doubt- less incliuled among the "sympathizers ; " and one is under- stood to have joined another Ciuirch. Deduct the first seven of these eight from the 26 signers and sympathizers claimed by the petitioners, (for in all their calculations they include the general letter men,) and it leaves them but 19. That is, they do not even claim more than 1 9 signers and sympathizers, out of the 46 male members above stated; — the other seven of their number consisting of men who had been dismissed by general letter, and who tlierefore were no longer reckoned as members by tbe Church. If, however, these were included us members, it would increase the num- ber of male members to 53 at the date of the memorial. Twenty-six is not a majority of 53 ; neither is 19 a majority of 46. Take it which way they will, therefore ; include the general letter men, or exclude them ; and count in for the petitioners all the sympathizers they claim ; still they fall short of a majority of the ?iia?e members. Hence it appears — 1. That the petitioners to the Council, 20 in number, are not what they " styled theaisklves," according to the published declaration of that body, " the majority of the brethren of the South Congregational Church in New Haven." 2. Tiiat they do \oT "represent" a majority of the brethren. 3. That tlicy and all tlic "sympathizers" Ihcy claim, are not togi;thkr a majority of the brethren of the South Churcli. THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. 145 4. And admitting that they were, it would amount to nothing in a Churcli where there is no caste, but where ALi, the members, 150 to 160 in number, are by covenant and usage entitled to vote ; and where, since the last "secession" of disaffected members, 31st of July last, there has been almost perfect unanimity ; not five votes having been given at any Church meeting, since that date, in opposition to the views of Mr. Carroll and his friends. In one of those meetings the number of votes was between GO and 70. GOSSIP. The conversation alleged in the Rejoinder to have taken place between one of the petitioners and a member of the Standing Committee of the South Church, is not recognized by an]i member of that Committee as an actual occurrence. One of them remembers the conversation which he supposes is alluded to, but denies that it is correctly reported, even " in substance." He is represented to have said, in sub- stance : " It would make no difference if even three-fourths of the members were in favor of the motion ; so long as Mr. Hallock wished Mr. Carroll to staj', ho would stay, and they could not help themselves. It has been often admitted by members of the Committee and others, that while the Church is sustained as it now is, almost entirely by the con- tributions of one man, his wishes would have paramount weight, and the self-governing power of the Church be virtually abrogated." The smallest proportionate majority ever given for Mr. Carroll, by the South Church, was on the 18th of February last, when there were 51 votes in his favor, and 22 against him, as announced at the time by the chairman, Dea. Minor. The way to test the truth of the «' three-fourths " statement, is, to get such a majority, or any majority at all. There is no chance to test it, so long as the petitioners and their sympathizers can muster only 2^ votes against 51. They will not pretend that a majority vote of the Church was ever overruled, or attempted to be overruled, by Mr. Hallock. Perhaps their meaning is, that a majority vote is sure to be given in accordance with his wishes. But how arc his wishes 146 THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. ascertained when he does not express thein, as is often the case ? It would be more coiTCct to say he is sure to sustain the will of the majority. Happily, an accordance of views has commonly existed between him and a majority of the Church, but not always. How about that "majority of the brethren " claimed by the petitioners on the occasion above alluded to 1 So there was a little independence left at that date, although confined to the petitioners and those who "sympathized" with them! When the last of them has withdrawn, agreeably to the advice of their own Council, all independence of opinion and of action will have gone with them, no doubt ! In other words, the Church will be united. " One of the petitioners is informed for the Jirst time, bj' tliis docu- ment, that censure has been passed upon him by the Church, which it is understood was voted at the dob-e of the ^rraijer meeting^ Dec. 2Wi, - 1863, (barely in time to be used in the reply of the Committee of the Church,) and without any summons to the accused, who was con- demned without a hearing. Considering that this brother is one of those who received letters of dismission, and over whom this Church has declared itself to have no control, it must be acknowledged that their action in the case vindicates the position wliich thej' claim for themselves, of being an ^ Indepaident Con'jnrjalional Church.'' " The censure passed upon the late Clerk, Dr. Nicoll, for tampering with the records, was in perfect accordance with the position maintained by the Church as to members dis- missed from it without as yet being connected with any other Church, viz : that although such persons are not enti- tled to the full rights of membership, yet the Church can exercise a watch and disci|»line over them until received into some other Church. By what authority, then, do the petitioners assert that "this Church has declared itself to have no control over those who have received letters of dismission ? " AVhen did they make^ such a declaration 1 Never. "This brother would stale that tlie fact which he noted in the re- cords was derived from the 2}ublic declarations of a majority of the brethren in their meeting, both as it respected their opinion and their THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. 147 votes, and it being the duty of the Clerk to note all matters of interest to the Church, this fact was duly recorded." We rather wish that "this brother" had been called before the Church, as it would then have been practically shown whether he held himself amenable to its jurisdiction, or whether he claimed the right of speaking and voting in its meetings, without being subject to its watch, care and discipline. However, both the Church and the public now know what would have been his defense, viz : that he made the entry complained of, on the strength of " the public declarations of a majority of the brethren in the meeting, both as it respected their opinion and their votes." Does he mean to say that " a majority of the brethren in the meeting " spoke in the meeting against the continuance of Mr. Carroll, and declared that they should vote against him ? If so, it looks like a previously contrived plan to accomplish an object. He first moves, and gains assent from an unsus- pecting majority, that the vote be taken by " secret ballot ; " and then, in his own "secret" way, claims to have ascer- tained that "a majority of the brethren" voted in the negative ; and so enters it upon the official records of the Church. No opportunity was given to the majority to chal- lenge the statement; confessedly it was not founded upon any actual vote ; it was not declared l)y the chairman or by any body else before the Church — but rested, and still rests, upon the naked assertion of the then Clerk, Dr. NicoU. A prudent man would not have voluntarily placed himself in a position where his integrity or accuracy would be so liable to be called in question, without any visible means of sub- stantiating his statement, which, even if correct, he had no right to enter upon the records of the Church, as it made a distinction which the Church had never authorized, between the votes of meml:)ers, and because such a stealthy mode of obtaining results, would, if tolerated, expose the Church, or any otiier body of persons where it was practiced, to the most enormous abuses. '•Jlr. Carroll's suunnarj' silencing of the bell while ringing for the victory at Yiokshurg. hnd induced many who had before been his sup- 148 THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. porters, to Vjelieve that lie was not a loyal man, and tliey were ready to unite in the call for his dismissal. It was under these circumstances that the Standing Committee assumed their ' discretionary powers ' and standing between Mr. Carroll and the Church, refused to allow the latter to pronounce its judgment, which it is nearly certain would have condemned him." If this is a correct statement, it proves that the occasion alluded to was exactl.y the time when any discretionary power which the Standing Committee possessed, should be exercised, to prevent hasty and injudicious action. The incident about the bell (which was subsequently explained to the satisfaction of a great majority of the Church,) was seized upon l)y those who had previously sought to displace Mr. Carroll, but had signally failed, as an encom*agement to renew the onset, hoping, under the excitement and mis- apprehension of the moment, to accomplish their object. Had they succeeded, it is now certain that they would have precipitated a course of action which a great majority of the members in their calmer moments would have deeply regretted; for, in every subsequent as well as previous meeting of the Church, Mr. Carroll has been sustained by a triumphant majority. Not sustaiued in the matter of the bell, for THAT as a distinct issue has never come before them ; ])ut sustained in his general course, as a most faith- ful, talented, and eminently useful minister of Christ, whom they desire to have for their spiritual teacher and guide, in preference to any other clergyman within their knowledge. Therefore we say that if, at the moment of the bell excite- ment, the Church would liave been " ready to unite in the call for his dismissal," as alleged by the petitioners, the Clerk and Standing Committee did them an invaluable ser- vice l)y refusing to call them together at that time. "The Committee say 'that the right of voting by females has never been denied by the Church.' Very true; neither has the right been affirmed by the Church, which would seem necessary, as the custom of Congregational Churches forbids the practice." This is falling from high ground. Before, the practice was contrary to the Scriptures; now it is contrary to cus- THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. 149 torn. Whose custom 1 " Of Congregational Cliurchcs ; " but not of the South Church, as an independent bod5^ And do the petitioners pretend that among all the 284 Con- gregational Churches in this State, the custom in regard to female voting is uniform 1 Is it so in all the Churches represented in the late Ex-parte Council 1 If we are rightly informed, two Churches at least, of the twelve represented in said Council, practice female voting, at least sometimes. We refer to the Chapel-street Church, of which the Scribe of the Council, Rev. Mr. Eustis, is Pastor, and to the North Church, of which Rev. Dr. Button is Pastor. We have it from one who was present at the meeting which called Rev. Mr. Eustis, that female members voted for him as Pastor. Why then may not females in the South Church vote for Rev. Mr. Carroll as Stated Supply ? Also in the North Church, at a meeting subsequent to the one called for the purpose of repairing the organ, when it was suggested that the organ at the other end of the Church needed to be repaired, or replaced by another, there was a general rally of the Church members, male and female, and by their joint vote it was decided to retain their Pastor.* As. to the Chapel-street Church, we can hardly be mistaken when we find the statement confirmed by so good an authority as Rev. Dr. Dutton, one of the members of the late Ex-parte Council. In a letter, dated May, 1856, he wrote as fol- lows : " The Chapel-street Church, in one instance of elect- ing Pastor, received the votes of females; and also have done the same in the election of Deacons." In another part of the same letter Dr. Dutton wrote: "From the NATURE OF A Churcii, as composcd of renewed persons, and as having power of self-government, I do not think any argument can be drawn against the voting of females, but the contrary." This is sensible talk — pity he should talk differently in 1SG3-4. Another gentleman writes thus, under date of the 13th inst. : " I was present at a meeting to give Mr. Eustis a call, at which Deacon W. rose and sug- * Note by the Author op South Church History. — This infor- mation, although derived from a member of the North Church wlio was present at said meeting and voted, proved to be incorrect. 13 150 THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. gested that he -would like to know how those present regarded Mr. Eustis, — whether they would like to have him for minister. All that were present and disposed, threw in a vote." ' The same thing occurred in the College-street Church, if we are correctly informed, at a meeting for the election of pastor a few days ago, — since the holding of the Council. Nor are these the only exceptions to the " cus- tom" referred to, among the Congregational Churches of Connecticut. Indeed we know that in some others it is customary for females as well as males to rise, in token of assent to the reception of members into the Church, after the latter have taken the covenant. Raising the whole per- son is as truly voting as if only a hand were raised, and makes as much noise. If the " silence " text forbids the latter, then, a fortiori, it forbids the former. But it does neither. Nor any more does it forbid women's voting by ballot. Without quoting further precedents at this time, we should like to ask how and why it is so much worse for the South Church to do a certain specified act, than for the Chapel or North or any other Congregational Church to do the same; and whether it is bkcoming for one Church to assist in exommunicating another, for doing what it does itself As the South Church is now the aggrieved party, why should it not proceed to convene a Council, ostensibly to consider its own grievances, but really to get the Chapel- street and North Churches excommunicated, for violating " the principles and usages customary among the New England Churches?" And why should not Mr. Carroll assemijle the Presbytery to which he belongs, and cause to be arraigned before it the several ministers who were mem- bers of the late Cou.icil, and if they neglect to appear, have them pronounced not ordained, liecause they failed to give to the Presbytery " proper evidence of their ordination " as clergymen in regular communion with the Presbyterian body, or with any other " evangelical denomination ? " and then tklegraph it as a fact all over the land. Again we ask, why not 1 "It was tho usual practice in the South Church to vote by raising of hands, excepting in the case of officers who were elected by ballot, and f(jm?il(j V9te3 x\'9r^ rarely pfferei;! or counted." THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. 151 They were sometimes, then, — when the females chose to vote 1 Exactly. This was and is our custom. " No instance is known in wliicli females voted b}- ballot previous to the meeting when Mr. Carroll was settled by female votes." No one said they did. No one said that the vote on accepting Rev. Mr. Noyes' resignation was by ballot; — whether tlie 70 for accepting it and the five for rejecting it, voted by raising the hand or by ballot; but, that they enjoyed the right of voting, and did vote ; and if entitled to vote, (which the petitioners now admit,) they could vote either way. It is the right, not the mode, which is claimed, and the former includes the latter. "This argument [from the Covenant,] proves, if anything, that females have the right of being appointed deacons, acting upon com- mittees, the right of discus.sion in business meetings, and of praj'er and exhortation in prayer meetings." Begging pardon, this does not follow. The covenant does not authorize what the Scriptures forbid. The Scrip- tures forbid females becoming deacons. Acts, vi., 3. " Look ye out among you seven imen." The Scriptures forbid females to become exhorters in meeting. I. Tim. ii. 10, 11. The privileges conferred by the covenant upon ALL who take it, are limited by the Scriptures. Female members who take it, take it with this limitation, of course. While not i)ermitted to become deacons, or to exhort, they ARE entitled to all the privileges of membership not forbid- den by the Scriptures. Voting is one of them. No where is it forbidden in the sacred volume. We judge that the Standing Oommittee ake "prepared to follow out this argument to its logical conclusion." MR. CARROLL'S LOYALTY. A considerable portion of the petitioners' Rejohider is occupied with the question of Mr. Carroll's loyalty. There are several kinds of loyalty in this country at the 152 THE EX-PAETE COUNCIL. present time, — some good, and some not so good. In order to know whether a man is loyal or not, it is necessary to ascertain wliieli kind of loyalty is intended. One kind blows its own trumpet, while it looks ont for fat contracts, custom-house pickings, or any other chance to serve its country by filling its own pocket. Another kind, which is perhaps the most common of all, would, if analyzed, yield about the following results : abolitionism, 23 ; sectionalism, (the same which existed before the present war began, — not to say, which fomented and precipitated the war,) 27 ; patri- otism, 2 ; self-righteousness, 6 ; real benevolence, 1 ; party animosity, 10; intolerance, 13; dish-water, 4; shoddy, 9; other ingredients too subtle to be easily ascertained, 5. Total, 100. It is admitted that m this sense of the word, Mr. Carroll is not as loyal as he might be. And if on that account he was waited on by a mob some two or three years ago in his native city, Brooklyn, it is nothing more than has happened to many of the purest patriots in the land. During the war of 1812, Gen, Lhigan, of Balti- more, was killed by a mob. Even abolitionists have some- times been complimented in that way. The Apostle Paul encountered one at Ephesus. Mobs only disgrace the par- ties concerned in them, or who set them on; not the objects of their hatred. When the petitioners are obliged to resort to an alleged remark "stated" to have been made some where to some- body at some time or other, by Mr. Carroll, to the effect that, " were it not ibr personal considerations, he would go south of Mason and Dixon's line and share the fortune of the rebellion," it shows how hard up they are for evidence to impeach his loyalty. They are however kind enough to say, " In the matter of loyalty claimed for the friends of Mr. Carroll — this has not been denied." "Well; 130 of these loyal " friends," in their letter to Mr. Carroll accom- panying a New Year's Gift of $500, say, — "Wk are wit- nesses of the gross injustice of the imputations attempted to be cast upon your fidelity to the Government under which we live. On nearly if not quite every Sabbath since you came among us, you have prayed for our country, its rulers, its officers and soldiers, the sick and wounded, the THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. 153 (lying and bereaved ; that the crushing son'ows which rest upon us may be overruled for the highest good of our whole nation, and the glory of God ; and tliat in His own time and way He will stay the torrents of blood and tears which are flowing all over the land, and grant us a righteous Pkace." And again, — "We never heard a word from your lips which by any fair construction of language could be made to imply a lack of real patriotism, or any thing inconsistent with a faithful allegiance to the Government of your country." "Has Mr. Carroll forgotten the language he used in public praj-er on the morning of the Lord's Day when news came of the battle before Fredericksburg ? " If Mr. CaiToll has forgotten that prayer, his people have not. Whether it was "tall" or short, it was one of the most solemn and earnest prayers that we ever listened to ; melting an entire audience, except, of course, the petition- ers and their "sympathizers," whose lively imaginations pictured images of disloyalty where nothmg of the kind existed. On the following Sabbath he delivered a deeply interesting address on the character and life of Thomas E. Barrett, one of his members, who fell in that battle; describing him as a real patriot, who went forth not for any selfisli or sinister purpose, but honestly to serve his country. As to that ever memorable sermon to the loth regiment upon their "duties as soldiers" to their country and to Christ, the immense audience who listened to it, filling the entire church, were held in breathless silence and riveted attention, and none were more moved than the soldiers themselves, several of whom have written home about that very discourse, the memory of which strengthened them in the front of the battle. Woidd that it might be repeated by our Pastor — speaking not, as one of our former minis- ters did, to empty 21 CIVS, supposed to he filled with soldiers, but to actual soldiers, either in his Church or at the Hos- pital, where he has always olliciated with the utmost plea- sure to himself and to those whom he addressed. 13* 154 THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. " In the year 1857 tlie number of members admitted to the [South] Church was forty-seven." There must be some mistake here, as the mimber of per- sons admitted in 1^57 was only sixteen. Probably the year 1858 is intended; but even in that year, according to the Church records, only 42 were admitted, and according to the tabular statement in the Congregational Quarterly, 43. The number mig/it have been 47, or even greater, speaking after the manner of men, but for the fact that at the most interesting period of the revival, our then minister was absent from bis charge for nearly a month, on a preach- ing expedition to the West. While the South Cliurch, under the faithful labors of its pastors, has, with the bless- ing of God, received in the year 1863 about as many mem- bers as it did in the memorable year before mentioned, (the year of the great revival throughout the land,) most other Churches have languished. Indeed, for the last five years, the statistics of the Churches generally, so far as we have had opportunity to examine them, show but a melancholy record. The last report (18G3) of the General Association of Connecticut contains a paper by Rev. Dr. Cleaveland, of this city, which says:— "In 1859, one hundred and ten Churches, with 14,184 members, gained not one from the world. In 1860, one hundred and thirty-six Churches, with 19,323 members, were alike fruitless. In 1861, one hundred and forty-six Churches — more than hall our whole nunibei- — with 19,685 members, received not one by profes- sion." It further appears from the same document, that in 1859, 1860 and 1861, tl)o aggregate nuiuher of members admitted by profession into all the Congregational Churches of Connecticut, was 597 less than the number of deaths. The statistics of the years 1862 and 1863 are not presented in the same way, but we doubt if they will prove any more favorable. Indeed, we expect they will show a further diminution. Dr. Cleaveland barely hints at what may be one of the causes of this declension, when he says, " It becomes us to be on our guard lest any of the great doc- trines of grace which in all ages have been the wisdom and THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL. 155 power of God unto salvation, should be eclipsed by nearer, but infinitely less important objects," "At least SEVENTY members, including the petitioners, have left [the South Church] during the year, or are ready to leave the Church when another place of worship shall be provided, because of their dislike to Mr. Carroll's ministrations." We have learned to be somewhat distrustful of the calcu- lations of the petitioners. Thus far they have done the Church no harm, but good, by leaving it. Notwitiistanding secessions, the immber of members is larger than when Mr. Carroll first came among us. The audiences are also larger. They are larger since the holding of the Council than before. What the petitioners and their "sympathizers" may be able to accomplish hkreafteu, of course we do not know. But, at present, we feel no uneasiness ai)out it. We only hope they will be as comfortable and happy in their new relations as we are in ours. It is the general feeling among the members, that the ])rospects of the Church were never better. Now that Mr. Carroll has declined the call to New York, we all breathe more freely, and expect to prosper greatly, if his life and health are spared, and if God continues to bless his labors among us. '■Alreadj' a larger sum has been pledged b}- persons in the vicinity of the South Church to support the preaching of the Gospel, in case a new Church is formed, than has ever been raised in one year by that Church for the same purpose, aside from the contributions of one individual.'' In a paragraph quoted above, the petitioners speak of the Church as "sustained * * * almost entikely by the contributions of one man," and complain of tlie influence thereby exerted by him. As the petitioners and their sym- pathizers appear to have a plenty of money, the question is, why they did not curtail this one man's power, by taking upon themselves a larger portion of the burden which gave him that power. It will not answer to say that they do not like Mr. Carroll ; for he has been with us but about twenty 156 THE EX-PAETE COUNCIL. montlis, and his predecessor, during the latter part of his ministry at least, was in full sympathy with the petitioners on the topics of which they now complain. Why did not the "seventy" pour forth their offerings liberally to sustain Mr. Noyes ? Why leave the burden of supporting public worship under his ministrations, as well as Mr. Carroll's, almost entirely to "one man?" That one man, we dare say, would at any time have been willing to have his influ- ence curtailed in such a way. He simply paid what no one else did, or offered to pay. As however the petitioners, with all their ability, have, by their own showing, done " almost" nothing towards the support of the enterprise, might it not have been as well, (if they were dissatisfied with a minister whom they had more agency in procuring than the "one man" had,) to withdraw quietly to other Churches, as to get up an Ex-parte Council and excommu- nicate or attempt to excommunicate the whole concern ? However, if they are satisfied with the result, we are. But before parting, we will just cpiote an extract of a letter from a Congregational minister in the interior of the State, which we hope they will duly ponder. In feeling and judgment at least, we suspect he is one of many. He says, " If Congregationalism is right, your Church, as respects the management of its own affairs, is eminently right. If Congregationalism is right, your Church is not only right, but prospered because it is right. Your practice is in har- mony with common sense. Your reply to the Ex-parte Council is conclusive. According to your rules, or custom, each member has equal rights with every other member in strictly Church meetings, and of course may vote. In these particulars you are on the rock. Unless I sadly mis- take, yours is a model Congregational Church. I admire your manner of duing things. J i)ity the Ex-parle Council. Of course they will nut confess it, but they must be ashamed of their ofTiciousness as respects your alTairs. Since writing the above, I have read the llejoindor. If there was no more to be said, it had better not have been said ; for, in the light of brother C.'s friends' reply, what they say is not very creditable to theui." THE EX-PARTE COUXUIL. 157 In conclusion, we append the following extracts from an article in tlie Congre Eead : " And they departed from the presence of the Council, rejoicing that they were counted worthy to suffer shame for His name. And daily in the temple and in every house, they ceased not to teach and preach — Jesus Christ." In the absence of all Scriptural warrants, either "the memorial stone," 231 from example or precept ; from Christ or His Apos- tles ; from sermon or ej)istle ; or from the records of the assembled Church ; therefore we also exclude all secular, or political, or semi-political themes and dis- cussions from our ministry ; therefore it is we deem it our duty to preach only the Gospel — " not to know any thing among" the people " save Christ, and Him cruci- fied;" therefore it is we judge and say with Paul, "Now then, we are ambassadors for God " — " We, then, of all persons in the world," says Toplady, " sliould religiously abstain from whatever may conduce to cherish the seeds and fan the fires of civil discord. Shocking it is when they who profess to experience and to preach the love of Christ, can so far prostitute the dignity and design of their sacred calling as to offer fulsome incense at the shrine of aggrandized authority, or seek to exasperate differing parties against each other, instead of laboring to j^reserve unity of spirit, to strengthen the bonds of peace, and promote righteousness of life. Our direct business is with the policy of an invisible and better country. On the one hand, we are to sound the trumpet, not of secular, but of sjnritual alarm ; and on the other, to proclaim to them that mourn, and to them that believe, in Zion, 'Tlie joyful news of sias forgiven, Of hell subdued and peace with heaven.' " (2) It is unnecessary. There are other places pro- vided for political instruction, and open to all. Why make the House of God a caucus room ? There are 232 EEV, MR. Carroll's sermon other means, and ample for all. Why take those intended for spiritual ends, and so pervert them that they shall effect only what is selfish and secular "? It is the peculiar mission of the press to give such infor- mation. Why then should the j^ulpit voluntarily give up its mission that it may assume that of the press, which needs no extraneous help, throwing off on the wings of every hour innumerable and much wiser treatises on these subjects, and which neither asks nor gives thanks for foreign advocacy.^ Besides, we ask, in the words of Dr. Dwight, " Will party politics carry you to Heaven .? Has Christ said, ' He that is a Federalist, he that is a Democrat, shall be saved .^ ' Has he not said, ' He that believeth shall be saved; and he that believeth not, shall be damned ?' Has He not said, ' Except ye repent, ye shall all like- wise perish "? ' Has He not said, ' Without holiness no man shall see the Lord ? ' Has He not required you to ' Folloio peace with all men ? ' Has He not told you ' that the fruit of righteousness is sown in peace, of those that make peace ; and, therefore, that it cannot be sown in contentions — nor by them that work contentions ? ' " Not essential, sowing tlie seeds of discord, and already absorbing the minds of men six days out of seven elsewhere, is it necessary that another ^place, God's house, and another day, the Lord's Day, be appropriated for the discussion of such themes, and the dissemination of worldly knowledge, thus leav- ing the great God without a temple or a day for " THE MEMORIAL STONE." 233 His special worsliip, and the soul without a home where it may find a momentary truce, in its warrings with the world, even a temporary refuge from the din of party strife; where it may hear concerning a King- dom which is not of this world, and of a rest that remaineth to the people of God ? (3) It is inexijedient. Already invading the sanc- tuaries of our land, it has eaten out the very heart of spirituality, so that a revival of God's work in such Zions is an anomaly ; already does it threaten to usurp a permanently paramount place in the house of God and the hearts of His worshipers, demanding, even now, conformity to its political creed, as essential to Christian fellowship. Thereby Christians are driven away from their spiritual homes in hitter disappoint- ment. They come to hear the things of eternal life ; to be edified, upbuilt. And especially in such days of suffering and sorrow, to enjoy the consolations of the Gospel, and the sweet comfortings of the Spirit. But alas ! they find no oasis now in the house of God ; for wells of salvation and shading palms, only the monotonous waste of burning sand ; for the sincere milk of the Word, only the bitter waters of Marah ; while for the spirit of heaviness there is no garment of praise ; for the wounded spirit, no balm of Gilead. And what is the effect upon loorldlings ? They depart in disgust from the house of God, doubting the reality and value of Religion because of this coun- terfeit and caricature ; and how can the effect U2)on them be otherwise, " when the parishioner sits in his 20 234 REV. MR. Carroll's sermon, pew, silent and still by custom, decorum, and the manners of New England, and the preacher turns upon him every eye in the congregation for the poli- tics he practices, and for the party to which he has attached himself? How can it be otherwise when the very first word he hears in jirayer, the very first word he hears in a hymn selected to be sung, however well it may be sung, and by whatever choir, the very first illustration in the sermon to which he may listen, sends him away gloomy and irritable, turns the whole service into a political mockery, and awakens a train of reflection that renders him, from first to last, inac- cessible to the truth, closes his ear to the voice of the charmer, charm he never so wisely on that day ?" Is this expedient ? No. And we wonder not that multitudes endorse and repeat the saying of Henry Clay, and give it, as he did, as the reason for ceasing to attend a certain Church : " I have so much politics all the week, that I do not care to go to Church except to hear the Gospel." how different the result, if ministers, especially throughout New England, held the views and imita- ted the example of Rev. Dr. Dwight, President of Yale College. In the sermon already quoted, and preached in the Chapel on the National Fast, August 20th, 1812, he says : " I wish it to be distinctly understood that, in the progress of my ol^servations, no party will be ar- raigned ; the character of no i)erson attacked ; no public measure censured ; and the feeling of no indi- " THE MEMORIAL STONE." 235 vidiKil wounded. All who are here, or all who are elsewhere, will be considered merely as creatures of the same Grod ; as bound to the same eternity ; as alike interested in renouncing sin and returning to holiness ; and as bound alike to regard the work of the Lord as the operation of His hand." how different the result, if the tribute the great Rufus Choate paid his Pastor, could be truthfully given to every minister in New England ; if every parishioner could assign it, as he did, as one reason, not for leaving, but attending Church. He says : " Every one of us assuredly felt, as we came here from Sunday to Sunday, and took our seats in our pews, that we should hear nothing in the world but Religion preached from the pulpit, and no manner of politics. State or National, directly or indirectly ; nothing connected in the remotest degree with the party considerations or organizations of the day. We came here, if we came as we professed we did, to hear of those things which pertain to Religion, to the sal- vation of the soul, and to the rest everlasting. And I have uniformly found it to be true, that I heard nothing, was assailed by nothing, was secularized by nothing, was defended or attacked by nothing which I had done, nothing for which I had voted or acted in the political world without. Never in an intro- ductory prayer, never in a hymn, occasionally or in the ordinary course of public worship selected, never by any illustration in any sermon, by any train of association, right or wrong, was I carried back into 236 REV. MR. Carroll's sermon, the world that I had left, and which I should have been willing, for that day at least, to have forgotten forever/' * (4) My Ordination Vows forbid it. What says the Constitution of my Church, which every Presby- terian minister in his ordination vows declares " he sincerely receives and adopts as containing the system of doctrines taught in the Holy Scriptures ? " " Syn- ods or councils are to handle or conclude nothing but what is ecclesiastical ; and are not to intermeddle with civil affairs which concern the commonwealth." Can this be a reason why ordination by the Presbyte- rian Church is here practically repudiated ? And was the literal f alfillment of this vow by me, regarded as equivalent to a forfeiture of my credentials as an ordained minister of Jesus ? However this may be, " It is a very small thing that I should be judged of man's judgment ! " Man's judg- ment cannot affect my views of duty while I believe them to be right in the judgment and sight of God ; and therefore I still say with a brother minister, " that the point from which I regard and deal with men has never been as citizens of the commonwealth having civil duties to perform, but as ' fallen sinners, having need of salvation ; ' and the great thing at which I have aimed, and to which I have subordi- nated every thing else, is, to bring them to the Cross, to reconcile them to God through the blood of the Lamb, and to imbue them with the Spirit of the * See Mcmoriiil Volume, pp. ?>2, 38.' "the MEMORIAL STONE." 237 Divine Master. In saying this, I neither forget nor ignore the fact that I am the authorized expounder of Kevelation, which touches the entire circle of human duty. But I hokl this to be true, that when men have an intellectual acquaintance with their civil or social duties, the speediest, most effectual way to bring them to their performance, is, to press upon their hearts and consciences the great doctrines of the Cross. The all-comprehending source of sin is alienation from God. Bring men back to God, and you bring them back to the performance of all known duties." This has been my theory and practice during the nine years of my ministry, and ever ivill he. Amen. (5) It is mocking the Wants of the Immortal Soul. In the house of God the gospel feast is spread. Ministers of God, servants at the table, extend the invitation, — " Come, for all things are now ready ;" " come, buy wine and milk without money and with- out price. Wherefore do ye spend your money for that which is not bread ? and your labor for that which satisfieth not ? hearken diligently unto me, and eat ye that which is good, and let your soul de- light itself in fatness !" See ! yon hungry soul hears, believes, comes, " to taste and see that the Lord is good." It approaches, and from the rich pro- visions, asks for bread — the minister gives him this *' stone ;" he asks for meat — the minister gives him this "serpent ;" and with immortal hungerings unsat- isfied, the soul departs, mocked, betrayed, poisoned, stung. 20* 238 REV. MR. CARROLL'S SERMON, Behold that blind man ; it is Bartimeus. " They have let him know that the healer of the blind is near ; and I am sure that nothing they could say- about anything else, could make up for not telling him that. The most eloquent harangue on the poli- tics of the times, though Pilate, and Herod, and Caesar, and Roman eagles, and Jewish banners, and liberty, and nationality, and destiny, had rolled with splendid imagery through sounding periods, would have been a sad exchange for those simple words, — ' Jesus of Nazareth passeth by.' Nor would Aristo- tle's keenest logic, nor Plato's finest speculations, have served a whit better. The man was blind, and wanted his eyes opened ; and these things, however set forth, were but trash and mockery." — '■^ Blind Bartimeus," pp. 83-84. (6) It degrades and divides the Church of God. It degrades the Church. Edward Everett in a sermon "On the dedication of the First Congrega- tional Church in New York," administers a pertinent rebuke to those ministers and disciples of Christ who insist upon generating secular associations and kind- ling wordly excitements in the house of God, by the introduction of political themes. He says : " We dedicate our house to God ; to no earthly power, to no human name, but to God, who reigns on high. It is henceforth not ours, but His ; we resign, devote and consecrate it to Him." " We dedicate it to the o-lorious cause of tlie gospel. It is sacred henceforth to that alone. Let no other message be ever heard "the memorial stone." 239 within its walls ; no human science, no learning or art of this world ; no case or interest which begins or ends with man ; but the holy faith of the Son of God and the truth as it is in Jesus." Any other course than this we believe degrades the Church by making her the partner of the State, and at length its tool and servant. This accomplished, and her dishonor and degradation are complete. Polluted by the hand of secular power ; her fair robes rent and soiled ; her head bowed and crownless ; her hands chained to Caesar's chariot wheels ; behold the once fair bride of Christ ! Such a course of necessity divides the Church. It is the procuring and i)rolific cause of ecclesiastical schism. Breaking down the partition wall, the world comes in upon her like a flood. The excitements and storms shaking the State, sweep over and convulse the Church. How fully does the history of the Church, especially in our own country, manifest this fact : once introduce questions agitating the commonwealth into the sanctuary — once sow this wind, and you reap the whirlwind. You light the flame which burns out spirituality and Christian charity ; start the wedge that drives through and disrupts whole denomina- tions of Christians ; seize the sword that rends in twain the seamless -robe, and hews the perfect body of Christ. Hence the jealous care with which the Apostles guarded the infant Church from the political conflicts of their day. Hence their refusal to iden- tify the Christian Church with the government of 240 REV. MR. CARROLL'S SERMON, Jew or Gentile. The great secret of their success in organizing and establishing Churches in the various countries through which they passed, and amid <;ivil revolutions and convulsions, was this : Apostolic ercclusion of the secular, and inclusion only of the spiritual. It was the ignoring of this principle — the obliteration of this demarcation and distinction — the departure of ministers and Churches from Apostolic and primitive Church examples, that caused her sub- sequent and signal defeats ; her comparatively few and feeble triumphs ; and in this land at least, has written "Icliabud" on Llio Church of God. True, as mi^niDraljle, are the words of Edmund Burke : " Politics and the pidpit are terms that have little agreement. No sound ought to be heard in tlie Church but the voice of healing charity. The cause of civil liberty and civil government gains as little as that of Keligion by this confusion of duties. Those who quit their proper character to assume what does not belong to them, are, for the greater part, ignorant both of the cliaracter they leave and the c}iaracter they assume. Wholly unacquainted with the world in which they are so fond of meddling, and inexperi- enced in all its aifairs, on which they pronounce with so much confidence, they have nothing of politics but the passions they excite. Surely the Churcli is a ])lace where one day's truce ought to be allowed to the dissensions and animosities of mankind." r am aware tliat th(>se views concerning the sphere and duties of the gospel ministry in this respect, are "the memorial stone." 241 in direct antagonism to those of the Congregational ministry here, and that this difference is regarded by them as radical and essential ; so much so, that from a candidate who is not prepared to conform to their views and practice in this i)articular, license is some- times withheld. My convictions of duty are strong and conscientious ; and being so, cannot be abandoned to jjlease men, or to escape their frown. And if for excluding politics from my ministrations in a Congre- gational Church, I am utterly isolated, and stand alone in this city, or even in all New England, I can well afford to be singular. If for the maintenance of this principle I am persecuted, I glory in persecution. For one, I had ratlier he proscribed for unsiverving fidelity, and adherence to my convictions of duty, than, for a craven abandonment or a criminal com- promise of them, to be enthroned. I w^ould fain say with Pau], " None of these things move me ; neither count I my life dear unto myself, so that I might finish my course with joy, and the ministry which I have received of the Lord Jesus, to testify the gospel of the grace of God." Archbishop Leighton was once asked why he did not jjreach more to the times. His answer was : " 0, while so many are preaching to iXiQ times, give me, at least, leave to preach to the eternities." Be his reply ever mine ! 4th. — Deliverance from Death. Only four adults have died within the past two years, (although tiventy-seven of our members have 242 REV. MR. CARROLL'S SERMON, been exposed to sudden death in the army and navy,) and ^^all these died in faith." Mid the thunder of artillery, in the thickest of the furious contest, just where Death was holding such high carnival ; from the bloody hill-side of Freder- icksburg ; there went up the gentle spirit of a young man,* — son, husband, father, church member, Sab- bath School teacher, — to the holy hill of Mount Zion above, where grim visaged war, with its rude alarms, and fierce baptisms, and crimsoned graves, i^ known no more ; where peace, sacred and serene, for- ever dwells ; where is the rest that " remaineth ;" where, with the God of peace, he shall spend the Eternity of heaven, in the rest of serving of God. " Do yon mourn when another star Shines out in the ghttering sky? Do you weep when the noise of war And the rage of conflict die? Then let not your tears roll down And your hearts be sorely riven, For another gem in the Savior's crown, And another soul in Heaven!" Within siijrht of this church, from the bosom of his family, — listening to the voice of prayer and praise, heavenly melodies filling the soul, like the notes that come floating down to us from the harps of the angels, — passed aAvay the aged disciple and church officer. f As we bent over him adying, "my father ! my father ! the chariot of Israel and the horsemen thereof," fell from our lips, as he made his glorious exodus to the * Thomas E. Barrett. f Deacon Benedict Burwell. "the memorial stone." 243 Eternal.' As we stood around his grave, we tran- scribed the lines from Machpelah to his headstone, — the epitaph of Abraham, written by no human hand, — "An old man and full." " An old man \" — Yes, we see the patriarch in the wasted face ; in the dimmed eye ; in the furrowed brow ; in the trembling hand ; in the hoary head, whitened by the frosts of four-score winters, yet unto him a crown of glory, because "found in the way of righteousness," — covered with snow, yet, like the mountain-top, because nearest unto heaven. And "full," — full, like Abraham, not merely "of years," but of experience, not earthly only, but hea- venly, — the favor and friendship of God ; like him, full of graces, not human, but divine, — obedience, prayer, faith ; like him, full of anticipations, not bounded by the horizon of earth, but sweeping be- yond the shadows of time and the gloom of death, — looking for Christ ; and he too "saw His day and was glad," clasping Him in his dying arms, "the antidote of death ;" looking for " a city" too, — and lo ! break- ing on the dying vision, bathed in supernal splendor, are the jasper foundations, the sapphire walls, the golden street of that " city whose builder and maker is God," What anticipations these ! full-orbed hopes of seeing Jesus, and of entering where, with no shadow on the heart, no tear-drop in the eye, with golden crown on the brow, and palm branch of victory in the hand, he should be " presented before the presence of God's glory with exceeding joy." And of these hopes he 244 REV. MR. Carroll's sermon, was "full." And see, as he rises to the realization of them — as the celestial convoy, upbearing him on im- mortal wings, nears the radiant hills, exultingly chant- ing, " lift up your heads, ye gates" — lo ! these gates of flashing pearl wide open swing, while angel and archangel wake their harps to louder, loftier strains, sweeping them to the hallelujah anthem of Heaven's Harvest Home, because another matured soul has been ingathered to the garner of glory, " as a shock of corn cometh in in his season," ripe and " full." Mid heav- enly music, re-echoing his epitaph — " full" — bending before the throne to receive into his soul " fullness of joy," yea, " the fullness of the God-head," — we leave him. Not on the battle-plain, none by to quench the death-thirst or wipe the death-dew from the brow, but at home, mid its gentle, loving ministries, — a home fragrant Avith the incense of prayer, and per- fumed with the name of Jesus, — we saw the other soldier* member die. Standing by the bedside, where pain had made stone the downy pillow, we saw that scene of suffer- ing transfigured into a Bethel, with its vision, and typical ladder leaned against the sky ; saw the cham- l)er, darkened l)y the death-wing, made lustrous with the flashing of angel pinions, hovering there to carry the fluttering soul, all radiant and ready, to the pearly gates of its liome ! As the j^ulse grew weaker, and the breath shorter, the heart was fuller and the * John Crosby. "the memorial stone." 245 lips more eloquent with prayer and gratitude. He consoles the little group gathered round to catch his last, hallowed accents, with thoughts of a brighter world, where sorrow never enters ; where farewell tears are never shed ; where are no griefs nor graves ; where no harp ever wails the sorrows of a hleeding or a broken heart. Kindling visions of that w^orld are his ; heaven reveals its light and song, its triumj)hs and eternal transports, to allure ; God unveils His throne ; Christ, " the brightness of the Father's glory," flooding the death-couch with heavenly splen- dor, appears, fulfilling His promise, " I will come again, and receive you unto myself ;" while celestial voices, breaking on the dying ear, say, "come up hither." Leaning forward, as if responsive to the celestial call, the wan face reflecting the smile of God, from his faltering lips falls the mystic monosyllable, — " up" Hark ! again, with beaming eye stiJl riveted upon " the excellent glory," and with arms uplifted, anticipating ascension, is heard the key-note of the heavenly harper's song, ^'■up" — ^ come up hither;' and he went. In faith, also, the female member* and mother died. Disease had long marked her for its victim. Con- sumption laid its skeleton hand upon her, and flat- tered even unto death, imparting a hectic glow for the warm bloom of health, — autumn's leaf for the rose. Plying its stealthy, deceptive sapping at the * Mrs. Anna F. Gillette. 21 246 REV. MR. CARROLL'S SERMON, very root of life, the tree at length fell, with thick foliage and clustering fruitage still upon it. Wasting daily during a lingering illness, yet no murmuring, no repining. To the last " her spirit, like frankincense, gave forth increasing sweeetness the more the corpo- real part was consumed." And when the summons came, calmly she looked upon Death, not as the ter- ror-crowned one, hut as a kind messenger from her Father's house, and clasped his hand, that he might lead her, a weary and long ahsent child, home. Besides these, and these prepared, no adults have died, and only four of our little ones, — lamhs trans- ferred to the arms and fold of the Good Shepherd. And I always thank God, when, descending to the brink of Jordan, little hands press mine, and when it is the loving spirit of a confiding child I there anoint. For " verily to the eye of faith, nothing is fairer than the death of young children. Sight and sense indeed recoil from it. The flower, that like a breathing rose filled the heart and home with an exquisite delight, — alas, we are stricken with sore anguish to find its stem broken and the blossom gone ! But unto Faith, eagle-eyed beyond mental vision, and winged, to mount, like the singing lark, over the fading rainbow unto the blue heaven — even this is touchingly lovely. The child's earthly ministry was well done — for the rose does it work as grandly in blossom as the vine with its fruit. And having helped to sanctify and lift heavenward the very hearts that broke at its farewell, it hag gone from this troublous "the memorial stone." 247 • sphere, ere the winds chilled or the rains stained it, leaving the world it blessed, and the skies through which it passed, still sweet with its lingering fragrance, to its glory, us an ever-unfolding flower in the blessed Garden of God ! Surely prolonged life on earth hath no boon like this ! For such mortal loveliness to put on immortality — to rise from the carnal with so little memory of earth that the mother's cradle seemed to have been rocked in the house of many mansions — to have no experience of a wearied mind and chilled affections, but from a child's joyous heart, growing up into the power of an archangelic intellect — to be raptured as a blessed babe through the gates of Par- adise. Ah ! this is better than to w^atch as an old Prophet for the car of fire in the valley of Jordan." Come, my people, come, and sadly, yet smiling through our tears, let us set up the stone, and on it an " Ebenezer" too, when it is a memorial unto us of '•' garnered immortaliiy." ^ Great deliverances, or exemptions from evil, imply great positive blessings. To some of these I have alluded in passing. Others must be omitted for want of time. But I cannot forbear to dwell for a moment, — Lastly, — Upon the Positive Features of our Deliverance from Spiritual Declension, so far at least as they are shown by outiuard results, — and for them to raise the monumental pillar. 248 REV. MR, Carroll's sermon, To place these results in a stronger light, I will compare the number of admissions into this Church during the two years of my ministry here, with those of the years immediately preceding, and also with those of other Congregational Churches in this city and State. This I do, not in a spirit of vain-glory, — God forbid such a thought, — but to correct an im- pression industriously and joerseveringly circulated iii the community, to the effect that this Church was in a highly prosperous condition when I took charge of it, but that it has since dwindled in numbers, and almost fallen to pieces. Let us never forget, that whatever of good there is within us or about us, — whatever blessing is bestowed upon us, — is the free gift of our dear God in Ciirist, to whom be all the glory. There have been received into this Church during the two years of my ministry here, fifty-nine mem- bers, viz : forty-one by profession, and eighteen by certificate from other Churches. The number sepa- rated from us during the same period, commencing 1st June, 1862, is sixty-three, viz : fifty-seven by certificate, two by discipline, and four by death. The number admitted is exactly equal to the number dis- missed by certificate and by discipline : Death is the only enemy that has made any encroachments U2)on us, beyond what, by the grace of God, we have been able to meet and overcome. But death has been foiled in his efforts, for each victim was crowned a conqueror, exclaiming, '' 0, death, where is thy sting." These "the MEMORIAL STONE." 249 results, viewed in connection with the extraordinary- efforts which have been made, both within and with- out the Church, to crush it out, unless we would yield to the dictation of others as to the topics which should be introduced into the pulpit, and the manner in which they should be discussed, are indeed most encouraging. Of those who have voluntarily with- drawn during the period mentioned, forty-three are supposed to be in sympathy with the movement which culminated in the calling of an ex-parte Coun- cil ; leaving a gain of fourteen, so far as that move- ment was concerned. It is due to verity, however, to state, that quite a number of the families repre- sented in this movement, and even of these Church members, have seldom attended the services of this sanctuary, during my ministry ; so that what would seem to be a loss to us, is in many, if not most cases, a gain." It is surely a gain to be freed from a disturb- ing element, which never could be pacified except by yielding to its dictation. It is a gain to feel that we are speaking to friends, and that as a Church and people we are united. As au illustration of our essential unity since the withdrawal of disaffected members, it may be remarked that only in a single instance within the last ten months, has there been a dissenting voice on any question before ilie Church. If we now proceed to compare the above results with those of the tivo years next previous to my coming among you, we shall find still further cause for gratulation and encouragement. During those 21» 250 REV. MR. Carroll's sermon, two years, commencing 1st June, 1860, and ending 1st June, 1862, forty-five members were dismissed by certificate, discipline and death, and only nineteen received, viz : six by profession (three in each year,) and thirteen by certificate : showing a net loss of twenty-six members during those two years, over and above the admissions. If we go back yet another year, viz : from 1st June, 1859, to 1st June, 1860, we find again that only three persons were admitted by profession, and eleven by certificate. Thus it appears, that during these three years, commencing June, 1859, only nine persons were added by profession (three in each year), and twenty-four by certificate, (averaging eight in each year.) Undoubtedly, taking the whole period of eleven and a half years since its organization, this Church has been blessed in a remarkable degree ; especially during the incumbency of Kev. Dr. Stiles. God blessed it ; numbers came to listen to the powerful 2>reaching of the minister ; and very soon a revival commenced, which resulted in the conversion of many, and their admission to the Church. On the first day this sanctuary was opened, (last Sabbath in June, 1852,) the services resulted in the conversion of a confirmed sceptic, who, a few months after- wards, united with this Church, and has ever since adorned his profession. The Church was organized November 8th, 1852, with twenty-nine members, gathered from ten different Churches, in three States, "the memorial stone." 251 and representing three denominations of Christians. In the following month eight more were admitted, five of them by profession, making a total in 1852 of tlm^ty-seven. In 1853 forty-seven were received — including twenty-six by profession. In 1854, thirty- two, including seventeen by" profession. In 1855, fifty-four, including thirty-five by profession. Thus far, and indeed for some time longer, there was no collision of opinion among the members, — for all were satisfied with the faithful preaching of the word. Secular and political or semi-political affairs were considered, as a matter of course, excluded from the pulpit. Nobody expressed a desire for their intro- duction. But in process of time the enemy came and sowed tares. He could not permit 'a work of so much promise to go on unimpeded. He whispered to some, as he did to the mother of our race, that they ought to know both good and evil ; they ought to be enlightened on all subjects in any way con- nected, or supposed to be connected, with religion and morals ; and who but the minister should teach them ! The rest is too recently and too well known, to require repetition here. Suffice it to say, that a kind Providence, in a way that we knew not, and should not have chosen, has freed us from these de- structive influences, and opened before us new visions of prosperity and i)eace. Our present number is 170 ; of whom 50 are males, and 120 females. The whole number who are, or have been members, is 338. Of these, 184 were ad- 252 REV. MR. CARROLL'S SERMON, mitted by profession, and 154 by certificate. Of the 168 who have been members, but are not so at present, 73 were admitted by profession, and 95 by certificate. Of the whole number dismissed, 23 were removed by death, 5 by discipline, and 140 by cer- tificate. The addition of 59 members, in the two years just closed, (41 by profession, 18 by letter,) is more man- ifestly a cause of special gratitude to God, because it has occurred during a period of great depression in the Churches generally, throughout the State and nation. Now compare this general resume with that of the Congregational Churches in the State. From the min- utes of the General Association, covering the last year of which we have returns, (the calendar year 1862,) we find that the aggregate number of persons admit- ted to all the Congregational Churches in Connecticut by profession, was 83 less than the number removed by death. In the same document, page 104, we find this further general review : " For the last four years, 187 Churches, two thirds of the whole num- ber, have lost more by death than they have gained by profession. In these years, ten large Churches — only one of them a city Church — with 2,633 mem- bers, have added only nine by profession, while they have lost 233 by death ; twenty-six times as many as they have added. In the last five years — 1858 to 1862 — 4 Churches, with 170 members, have added none by profession. In the last four years — 1859 to "the memorial stone." 253 1862 — 28 Churches, with 2,672 members, have added none by profession. In the last three years — 1860 to 1S62— 45 Churches, with 4,747 members, have added none by profession. In the last two years — 1861 and 1862 — 83 Churches, with 9,447 members, have added none by profession. In the last year, 127 Churches, with 15,851 members, have added none by profession. For the last four years — 1859 to 1862 — from one-third to one-half of our Churches, yearly, have not added one by profession." Dr. Cleaveland, in his report to the Association, (page 51.) says: "In 1859, 110 Churches, with 14,184 members, gained not one from the world. In 1860, 136 Churches, with 19,323 mem- bers, were alike fruitless. In 1861, 146 Churches, more than one-half our whole number, with 19,685 members, received not one by profession." Compare, now, the statistics of this Churcli during the past tivo years of my ministry here, with those of other Congregational Churches in Connecticut during the two calendar years 1861 and 1862. (No later returns have yet been published.) We find that only one of the 285 Churches in this State received so large a number of members by profession in these years as have been admitted into this Church during the past two years. Tliat one Church received 42 members by profession ; this Church, 41. I also find that only two of the 285 Churches received a larger aggregate of members, including those admitted on certificate, than have been received into this Church during the past two years. One of these Churches 254 REV. MR. Carroll's sermon, received an aggregate of 74 in two years ; the other, 65, This Church, 59. And how does our record compare with that of the Congregational Churches in Neio Haven ? According to the Association statistics, the number of members admitted into the North Church by pro- fession during the two calendar years 1861 and 1862, was 25 ; Centre Church, 16 ; College Street Church, 8 : Howe Street Church, 7 ; Yale College Church, 9 ; Chapel Street Church, 7 ; Temple Street Church, 2 ; Davenport Chapel, (no Church in 1861,) 5 ; Third Congregational Church, 3 ; Fair Haven First, 1 ; Fair Haven Second, 1 ; Fair Haven Centre, 4 ; Westville, 2 ; Total in two years, 90. To the South Church, in two years, have been admitted by profession, 41 ; or nearly half as many as the total admitted to the other 13 Churches in two years. Yet Churches, whose barrenness and unfruitful- ness appall us, sit in judgment on this Zion, whose record is so favorable when compared with years immediately preceding in our own history, or when compared with the Churches of this city and State. Is it for this we are adjudged guilty of having signally failed to accomplish the legitimate objects of the institution of the Church of God, and declared to have forfeited all claims to be considered as a Christ- ian Church ? Dr. Cleveland, in his report, mourning over the lamentable condition of the Churches, and hinting at one of the causes, says : "the memorial stone." 255 " It becomes us to be on our guard, lest any of the great doctrines of grace, which in all ages have been the wisdom and power of God unto salvation, should be eclipsed by nearer, but infinitely less important objects." And it is a fair question to ask, how much of this failure of the great object of pulpit ministrations is chargeable to the admixture of foreign ingredients, which have blunted the edge of truth, and kindled worldly excitements and associations by the very means which should have led men to repentance, and on the day set apart by God Himself for His especial service and worship ? I presume not to decide ; but I am sure that there is nothing in these results which should lead this Church or its minis- ter to depart from the course they have pursued, of preaching and desiring to hear in this sacred place, and on this holy day, onhj the truth as it is in Jesus, — the truth which converts, sanctifies and saves. O, then, brethren, as we set up this stone, — memo- rial of so many fruits of the spirit — of positive spir- itual blessings in Christ Jesus — for this Ebenezer of the^as^, let us call upon our hearts, and all that is within us, to bless God's holy name. " Come, thou fount of every blessing, Tune my heart to sing thy grace; Streams of mercy never ceasing Call for songs of ceaseless praise. Here I raise my Ebenezer, Hither by thy help I'm come ; 256 REV, MR. CARROLL'S SERMON, And I hope by thy good pleasure, Safely to arrive at home. 0, to grace how great a debtor Daily I'm constrained to be 1 Let that grace, Lord, like a fetter, Bind my wandering lieart to thee. • Prone to wander, Lord, I feel it ; Prone to leave the God I love ; Here's ni}' heart, take and seal it, Seal it for thy courts above.'' To conclude : — Let God's watch and ward through these ordeal years, His precious deliverances and positive bless- ings, quichen our faith, and impel to greater effort during the new year which dawns so brightly on us to-day. Think not the stone we set uj) here, and now, is merely an Eben-ezer of the past ; it is likewise an Eben-ezer unto the future.. Then, let memory and hope be busy ; while one recalls divine goodness, let the other anticipate divine aid ; and while recol- lection of past guardianship insjHres re-dedication and re-consecration, let expectation of a helping Omnipotence urge to a more zealous and strenuous performance of our work ; a work, the results of which, grasp Eternity for their duration. Brethren, remember, — " the time is short ;" the time for the accomplishment of this mighty work. " The night Cometh," Be admonished, then, by these fast fleeting years, " to work while it is called to-day,'' 0, ho"W "the memorial stone." 257 rapidly the years go by ! Nine years ago this month, I knelt at the altar, and was ordained a minister of Jesus ; eleven years and a half since, you were organ- ized as a Church of Christ. All these years of my ministry, and your liistory, gone — beyond recall. Let us '' redeem the time ;" •'Do something, do it soon, with all our might; An angel's wing would droop if long at rest ;" remembering we are co-workers with God — and "God himself inactive were no longer blest" — remembering too the days of toil are nearly over, and days of remaining rest and reward nearly ours. Then, brethren, let us work — work for our own soul's sake, for this dear Church's sake, for Christ's sakg, with all the energy which the hastening glories of our on-coming Eternity can inspire. Very close to this Eternity do we lift our memorial pillar to-day ; like Samuel's, even within sight of the holy city. "Why see, see — the very glory that i:»lays upon its summit, is light flashed from the pinnacles so near, of the heavenly Jerusalem !" while the golden radiance streaming through the now open portal, reveals in letters of living light traced by the hand of God, that epitome of our history and our hope, — " Eben- EZER," " Ei?en-ezer." Amen, Amen. 22 CONFESSION OF FAITH. We believe in one only living and true God^ the Fa- ther, the Son, and the Holy Ghost; unchangeably perfect in goodness, wisdom, and power ; the univer- sal Creator, Preserver, Benefactor, and King, who works all things after the counsel of his own will, without impairing the liberty of the creature. We believe that God has an infinite right to the services of his rational creatures, and that he requires of them, under penalty of his eternal displeasure, to love him supremely, and each other as themselves. We believe that God made man upright ; that our first parents freely sinned and fell ; that in conse- quence of this act, their descendants, until regene- rated, are utterly devoid of holiness, dead in tres- passes and sins, and helplessly exposed to the right- eous wrath of God. We believe that God, who is rich in mercy, of his own good pleasure has provided a glorious salvation for ruined man, 1 2 CONFESSION OF FAITH. " We believe that the Son of God, who is equal with the Father, having taken upon himself our nature, and thus becoming man as well as God, did, by his sufferings and death in our stead, make atonement for our sins ; that he rose from the dead and ascended into heaven ; where he ever liveth to make interces- sion for his people. We believe that through him God offers forgive- ness to all men ; and that every sinner who turns to God by repentance, and relies upon the Lord Jesus Christ by faith, is justified by His righteousness. We believe that the Holy Ghost, who is very God, by special agency works in all those who are chosen to salvation, that change of heart from sin to holi- ness, without which no man can enter into the king- dom of God ; and though God will save no man who does not work out his own salvation to the end, yet, whenever he commences a good work, we believe, through sovereign grace, the Holy Ghost will surely work in that man to will and to do until the day of Jesus Christ. We believe that God has revealed all things neces- sary to salvation in the Scriptures of the Old and New Testament ; which, being given by the inspira- tion of the Holy Spirit, are the only infallible rule of faith and practice. CONFESSION OF FAITH. .3 We believe that it is the Scriptural^duty of the disciples of Christ to associate themselves for worship and communion ; for mutual watchfulness and im- provement ; for the administration of Baj^tism and the Lord's Supper ; and for the perpetuation and ex- tension of the Redeemer's kingdom ; and that every association of believers for these purposes is a Christ- ian Church. We believe that there will be a general resurrec- tion of the righeous and of the wicked ; and a general judgment, by the award of which the righteous will be admitted to everlasting happiness, and the wicked sentenced to misery without end. Do voii cordiallv assent to these Articles of Belief? COVENANT. Through Christ strengthening us, without whom we can do nothing, here in the jDresence of God, angels, and men, we humbly covenant, from this time hence- forth and for ever, that we do renounce the world, the flesh, and the devil ; that we do give up ourselves, soul and body, all that we have and are, unto God, our Father, to love and to serve him, and to be his, and at his disposal in all things ; unto the Lord Je- sus Christ, our Saviour, Prophet, Priest and King, for our salvation and his glory, to be taught, strength- ened, governed and employed in all the relations and circumstances of life ; and unto the Holy Ghost, our Sanctifier, to be influenced, edified, and comforted by his gracious power, unto all Christian perfection and usefulness. And we do further promise, that we will walk with this Church in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord, and in love and charity with all its mem- bers ; resolving, for their encouragement and our own spiritual progress, that we will endeavor, by personal eff'ort and influence, to promote its purity, efficiency, and enlargement. Do yoii thus solemnly covenant and promise ? Then doth this Church affectionately receive you to its membership, and welcome you to all the privileges, labors, and blessings of the Household of Faith. Thus you are admitted to this Church, and liave a right to all its privileges. May you have grace to improve them to the glory of God and your own edification. STANDING RULES. 1. Officers. — The officers of this Church, in additiou to the Pastor and Deacons, shall consist of a Clerk, Treas- urer, Standing Committee of three, and a Cotnmittee on the State and Progress of the Church, who shall be elected annually. The pastor and deacons shall be ex-officio mem- bers of the Standing Committee. 2, Duties of the Officers. — In the absence of the pastor, the oldest deacon present shall preside. The Clerh shall keep a record of the proceedings of the Church, a list of members, and of baptized childi-en, and note the changes by death, removal, or marriage, and make a report thereof at the annual meeting. It shall be his duty to enter the names in full of all persons admitted to the Church, or dismissed from it, not only in the alphabet- ical list of members, but in the general record of proceed- ings. The Treasurer shall receive all contributions of the Chm-ch and congregation, and disburse them under the di- rection of the Standing Committee, and make a specific an- nual report. The Standing Committee shall receive all applications for admission to the Church, and after satisfactory examin- ation, recommend them for acceptance ; examine, and re- port on all cases of discipline ; direct for what objects^ and at what dates, benevolent contributions shall be taken up ; appoint collectors ; ascertain the wants of poor members, 6 STANDING RULES. and make appropriations, when necessary, for their relief; and attend to such other matters as may he referred to them by the Church. The Committee on the State and Progress of the Church shall take note of interesting facts and occurrences, and embody them, with suitable suggestions, in an annual re- port. 3. Membership. — Persons desirous of professing their faith in Christ, in connection with this Church, who shall have been recommended by the Standing Committee, shall be publicly propounded at least two Sabbaths before Com- munion. If no objections are oflFered within this period, to theu- reception, they shall be admitted by the Pastor in the usual manner. Persons recommended for admission, by certificate from other churches, shall be received, by vote of the Church, at a regular meeting. 4. Dismission of Members. — It is expected that mem- bers, on removing, will ask for letters of dismission and re- commendation. Requests for such letters may be announ- ced at the weekly prayer-meeting or lecture, and if, at the end of one week, no objection has been made, IJie Pastor or Clerk shall issue the customary certificate. 5. DisciPLiM'\ — The directions given. Matt, xviii. 15- 17, shall be observed in regard to private offenses. Public offenses shall be referred to the Standing Committee, who shall investigate and report on the same to the Church. Censure, of every degree, shall be passed only by vote of the Church. Members who statedly absent themselves from the ap- pointed services of tbis Church, without presenting satis- factory reasons therefor, shall be amenable to discipline. STANDING RULES, 7 6. Committee on the Sabbath School. — There shall be a Committee of three persons, appointed quarterly, by the Church, whose duty it shall be to visit the families con- nected with this Church and Congregation, and endeavor to awaken an interest in the Sabbath School, on the part of parents ; to secure the regular attendance of their chil- dren ; to visit the Sabbath School, and in cooperation with the Superintendent, to use every means in their power to promote the welfare of the School, and they shall make a report of their proceedings at the quarterly meeting ending their term of service. There shall be a quarterly meeting held in the months of January, April, July, and October, of which public no- tice shall be given, when the Sabbath School interest shall be specially considered, and reports received from the afore- said Committee and from one of the officers of the School. 7. Communion Services shall be held on the first Sab- bath of each alternate mouth, beginning with January next. 8. There shall be an Annual Meeting in the month of November, for the choice of officers, the presentation of an- nual reports, and the transaction of other business. 9. No additions or alterations shall be made to these Rules, except at an annual meeting, or a meeting called specifically for the purpose, and by a vote of two-thirds of the members present. Nev^t Haven, Nov. 22, 1864. SOUTH CHURCH PULPIT. INCUMBENTS. Rev. JOSEPH C. STILES, D.D., Stated Supply, from 1852 to Nov. 15, 1857. Rev. GURDON W. NOYES, Associate Supply, from June 25, 1854 to Dec. 1, 185t. Then Stated Supply, till May 24, 1858. Then installed Tastor till June 3, 1861. Rev. JOSEPH HALSTED CARROLL, Stated Supply, from June 1, 1862. Rev. MYRON BARRETT, Associate do. from Feb. 18, 1863 till May 1, 1864. DEACONS. BENEDICT BURWELL, from Nov. 19, 1852, till his death, April 14, 1863. EASTMAN S. MINOR, from Nov. 19, 1852 till July 31, 1863. THOMAS HORSFALL, from June 3, 1852. CHARLES H. WARNER, from Nov. 1, 1863. NICHOLAS COUNTRYMAN, from Nov. 1, 1863. OFFICERS ELECTED FOR ONE YEAR AT THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE CHURCH, NOVEMBER 22, 1864. STANDING COMMITTEE. Ret. J. HALSTED CARROLL,"] ^CH^VRLES F. HOTCHKISS, THOMAS HORSFALL, I ^ JOHN H. LEEDS, CHARLES H. WARNER, ( '^SAMUEL BRACE. NICHOLAS COUNTRYMAN, J ?" 10 OFFICERS. CLERK. TREASURER. GERARD HALLOCK. THOMAS HORSFALL. COMMITTEE ON THE STATE AND PROGRESS OF THE CHURCH. JOHN H. LEEDS, EDWIN W. TREAT, JOHN D. TYLER. OFTIOEES OF THE EOOLESIASTIOAL SOOIETT CONNECTED WITH THE SOUTH CHURCH. Elected Nov. 22, 1864, /or 07ie year. society's committee. THOMAS HORSFALL, GERARD HALLOCK, THOMAS H. FULTON, CHARLES F. HOTCHKISS, NICHOLAS COUNTRYMAN. CLERK. treasurer AND COLLECTOR. CHARLES II. WARNER. THOMAS HORSFALL. MUSIC committee. THOMAS HORSFALL, GERARD HALLOCK, CHARLES H. WARNER. USHERS. CHARLES F. HOTCHKISS, EDWIN W. TREAT. COLLECTORS IN CHURCH. PASCAL WITIIEY, CHARLES F. HOTCHKISS, EDWIN W. TREAT. ORGANIST. SLIP AGENT. FRANK L. MARTYN. CHARLES F. HOTCHKISS. SEXTON. HENRY W. BLAKESLEE. GENERAL LIST OF MEMBERS, Comprising all ivho are or have been Members, at any period from the organization of the Church, to Jan. 1, 1865. Explanation.— The letter c prefixed to a name, denotes that the person was re- ceived by certificate, from some other church. All others were admitted on profes- eion of their faith. The letter [r] at the end of a name, signifies that the person had before been a member of this Church, but having asked and received a certificate of dismisBion, now returned it, or brought a new one, and was re-admitted. The letter [w] inserted in the name of a female, signifies widow. In the names of married women, who were so at the time of admission, the name of the husband is inserted in a parenthesis. To ascertain wliether any person is still a member or not, and if not, when and howhe was dismissed, and wliither he has removed, see the two Alphabetical Lists, which follow this. In those Lists the names of women who have been married since their admission, as well as those who had been married before, take the names of their husbands. 1852. The South Church was constituted November 8th, 1852, consisting of twenty-nine members, who presented letters from other churches, as follows : C Benedict Burwell, Third Congregational Church, New Haven. c Polly (Benedict) Burwell, Third Congregational Church, New Haven. c Charles B. Burwell, " '' " " c Harriet A. (Chas. B ) Burwell, " " " c "William S. Porter, Fourth Church, Hartford. c Jane B. (William S.) Porter, Fourth Church, Hartford. c Caroline W. Burwell, Third Congregational Church, New Haven, c Jane S. Burwell, (afterwards Mrs. Thos. E. Barrett,) Third Congre- gational Church, New Haven, c Thomas Horsfall, Chapel Street Church, New Haven. c Sarah G. (Thomas) Horsfall. Chapel Street Church, New Haveu. 12 GENERAL LIST OF MEMBERS. c Nancy L. [w] Barrett, Union Church, Worcester. a Thomas E. Barrett, ♦ " " " c Amos Smith, Chapel Street Church, New Haven. c Maria (Amos) Smith, Chapel Street Church, New Haven. c Eliza (Gerard) Hallock, College Street Church, New Haven. C Lucy Coffin, " C Catharine McCann, (now the widow of Robert Steele,) College Street Church, New Haven. C E. Porter Belden, Presbyterian Church, Sing Sing, N. Y. c Eliza (E. Porter) Belden, " " " " C WilUam M. Hubbard, United Society, (North Church,) New Haven, c Harriet Jane (Wm. M.) Hubbard, " c Sarah M. Hubbard, (now Mrs. Wm. A. Wright,) North Ch., c Martha Jane Hubbard, C Eastman S. Minor, C Judith M. (Eastman S.) Minor, " c Ann M. (Stephen, Jr.) Hotchkiss, Trinity Church, c Augusta W. [w] Currier, College Street Church, c Grace G. [v>-] (Andrew L.) Mason, Howe Street Church, C Mrs. Mary E. Merrow, East Granby Church, Mass. At the first Communion, first Sabbath in December, 1852, the fol- lowing persons were received as members : Dec. c Mary (Stephen, Sen.) Hotchkiss. c Lucy Hotchkiss. c Harriet Hotchkiss. James V. R. Chapman. Frank Edwin Hotclikiss. George S. Minor. Alfred Mmor. Mary (John) Ward. 1853. Feb. c James L. Burnett. c Juliet (James L.) Burnett. c Tliomas Owen. c Josephine (Thomas) Owen. Caroline E. Alley, (now Mrs. George S. Foots.) GENERAL LIST OF MEMBERS. 13 George Bradley. Lovisa (George) Bradley. Margaret Collinson. Amelia Hotchkiss. Charles F. Hotchkiss. Olivia E. (Charles F.) Hotchkiss. Porter G. Hull. Abby (Johu) White. April, c Henry Judson. • c George "W. Nettleton. c Charlotte (George W.) Nettleton. c Evan Thomas. c Jane (Evan) Thomas. Emily Bliss Augur. Charlotte A. Cadwdl, (now Mrs. Henry Loomis.) Lydia G. Chidsey. Clarissa Chapman Porter. Laura Eliza Russell, (now Mrs. L. P. Deming.) June. Mary E. (Robert) Blair. C Nicholas Countryman. Henry L. Stewart. c Sarah E. (Henry L.) Stewart. c Harriet S. [w] Thompson. Josephine Benedict Clark. Martha C. (Caleb S.) Duell. Jane S. Price, (now Mrs. Terrill.) Mary [w] Severance. Aug. c George R. Bill. Caleb S. Duell. John C. Nelson. Elizabeth "W. (John C.) Nelson. Henry Martyn Barrett. David H. Hine. John Thomas Mix. Oct. c Christiana Young, (now Mrs. Theophilus H. Benham.) c Isaac Martin. c Eliza Jane (Isaac) Martin r. Chester K. Pond. 2 14 GENERAL LIST OF MEMBERS, c Nancy M. (Erastus R.) Pholpf?. c Polly [w] Armstrong. c Susan Carrington, (now Mvs. David H. Hine.) Dec. r James H. Beers. 1854. Feb. c Deborah (John L.) Cadwell. c Elizabeth (Charles B.) Pomeroy. Lewis Chapman. David Douglass. Mary Elizabeth [w] (Wm. G.) Hunter. Mary A. Smith. Mary Scott, (now Mrs. Chester E. Pond.) April. L. Amelia (Geo. E.) Bill. Celia Hall, (afterwards Mrs. James H. Beers.) Julia Virginia Phelps, (now Mrs. James "W. Wilson.) C Mary M. (Charles) Ward. August. Origen A. Barrett. Lindsley Monroe Burnett. Margaret (John) Crosby. . Charles Edwin Daily. Gerard Hallock. Charles Augustus Hotchkiss. c Agnes (Gurdon W.) Noyes. c Charles Phillips. c Patty (Charles) Phillips. Sarah Maria (Ransom H.) Thomas. John Wilkinson. c Elizabeth (John) Wilkinson. Oct. c Jane (Adam) Baird. c Marilla [w] Hall. ' c Louisa Hall. c Marietta Hall, c Elizabeth [w] Knox. Dec. John Crosby. c Lewis M. Mills. u Charlotte L (Lewis M.) Mill*. (J Lucv B. Minor. GENERAL LIST OF MEMBERS. 15 1855. Feb. Augusta Ailing. James Buchanan. Ann (James) Buchanan. Susan B. (Thomas C.) HoJlis. William C. Scobie. c Amelia (Wm. C.) Scobie. c Jane L. [wj Scobie. c Pascal Withey. c Lucy "Wells (Pascal) Withey. April. Horace A. Augur. c Fannie E. (Horace A.) Augur. Thomas Bence. Sarah (Thomas) Bence. Charlotte A. Churchill, (now Mrs. Minot \. Butricks.) Henry Clarence Daily. Ann (Wm.) Edwards. C Juha [w] Fowler. Sarah Fowler. c Mary Hill. Harriet Frances [w] (Wm.) Hull. C Willian\ Merwin. C Lucy (Wra.) Merwiu. c EmUy 0. Jlerwin. c Mary E. Merwin. c Rufus S. Pickett. c Catharine (Rufus S.) Pickett. Cornelia Eliza Taylor, (now Mrs. T. Hanson.) Charles Henry Warner. Sarah M. (Charles H.) Warner. June. Lucie Jane Benedict. C John Evans. Eliza (John) Evaus. Mary Emeline Hurd, (now Mrs. Frank Hayes.) Maria Louisa Mills. August. Cornelia Bevins. Maria Helen BeVins. Robert Dyas. 16 GENERAL LIST OF MEMBERS. Ellen Jeffreys. John H. Leeds. Sarah Jane Magie, (now Mrs. Orville F. Parsons.) Harvey Merchant. Catharine Cornelia (Harvey) Merchant. George Yonngerman. Emma B. (George) Youngerraan. October. Minot Augustus Butricks. Charles Burwell Foote. c Mrs. Ann Fenn. Dec. Alexander Adams. Hester Bishop, c Eliza H. BristoU. C William A. HaUock. Frances Amelia Hine, (now Mrs. John H. Leeds.) c Mrs. Mary Stuart. c Lucina S. [w] Tisdale. 1856. Feb. Susan Jane Street, (now Mrs. John Butler.) James Steele. c Jessie (James) Steele. Arabella [w] Tyrrell. April, c Mary (Ira) Bryan. Sarah (Tennis) Bowns. Charlotte E. (Thomas H.) FuIIod. John W. Scofield. Lavinia C. (Edgar) Scofield. June, c Andrew Baird. C Jane A. (Andrew) Baird. Margaret Baird, (wife of David.) Jennette Baird, (wife of Hugh.) August. Frederick Grant. Elizabeth W. McArthur. October. James Coggeshall. c Betsey A. Mansfield. Edgar Scofield. Dec. c Jane (Wm. B.) Catlin. GENERAL LIST OF MEMBERS. 17 c John Nicoll. c Cornelia C. (John) Nicoll. c John Stetson. c Harriet (John) Stetson. 1857. Feb. Reugeue L. Young. Mrs. Margaret Wright. June, c Maria K. Munson. c Wil'iam E. Scranton. c Sarah E. ("Wm. E.) Scrauton. August. Lucy J. Bryan. Mary A. Bryan. Paulina L. Thompson, (now Mrs. 0. B. Foote.) Frances M. Clark. Sarah D. Gaskill. October. Laura E. Gaskill. C Charles M. Shumway. C Mary (Charles M.) Shumway. Dec. c Maria (Henry S.) Cathn. c Lydia M. Lord. c A. L. Frisbie. 1858. Feb. Jane McPhee. June. JuUctta Currier, (uow Mrs. G. W. Hazel.) Isabella Baird. Sarah Baird. Jessie Ann Torbett, (now Mrs. Alaric McNeill.) Eliza Hare, (now Mrs. Henry Corbett.) Sarah L. Horsfall. Laura Burnett. James H, Burnett. Preston B. Burnett. Fideha Taylor, (now Mrs. Theo. Morris.) Elizabeth S. Duell, (now Mrs. Ed. A. Hart.) Charlotte Macomber. Mary E. Bunnell. Jennette Eddy. 2* 18 GENERAL LIST OF MEMBERS. George H. Butrickp. Sophia (George II.) Butriuks. Edward Gillette. Anna (Edward) Gillette. WOliam H. Hazel. George W. Hazel. Waldemir B. Ailing. Seth Gillette. Catharine (Seth) Gillette. Susan Martin. Louisa B. Tuttle, (now Mrs. D. Umberfield.) Phebe M. Dean, c Ezra Staples. c Vesta (Ezra) Staples, c Elias Gaylord. c Mary A. (Elias) Gaylord. c Martha Coggeshall. c James Torbett. C Ann (James) Torbett. C Lucy P. [w] Young. August. James A. Bryan. C Catharine C. Jones. C Catharine Moffat. Oct. c Marj- M. Abbott. c Polly Woodruff, c Martha Woodruff. C Mary S. Woodruff. c Martha Stewart. 1859. Feb. Lydia L. (John) Pier son. Ellen F. Corey, (now Mrs. James 11. Burnett.) C Amos Smith, [r.] See Note 1. June. Agnes [w] Baird. C Ira Ailing. 1. Admitted by letter, November 8, 1852. Dismissed in 18M, to Congregational Church in Orange. August, 1859, returned certific:ite, and was re-admittcd. Left (i«aln in 1804, without a certidcate from Snvith Church, and Joined College Street Church. GENERAL LIST OF MEMBERS, 19 C Hannah Ailing. August. Martha 0. Francis. c Robert Latta. c Elizabeth (Robert) Latta. C Arabella [\v] Tyrrell, [r.] See Note 2. [At this point of time the date of the Communion was changed. The next Communion after December, was held in March, and has been continued on each alternate month ever since.] I860. March.G John H. Leeds, [r.] ^ c Frances (John H.) Leeds, [r.] f ^^^ ^^°^ ^ C Thomas E. Barrett, [r.] \ C Jane S. (Thomas E.) Barrett, [r.] \ ^^^ ^'"^ *■ c PoUy W. WilUams. c Abbie S. Williams. John "Wallace. July, c Henrietta E. Walker. C John R. Garlock. c Catharine (John R.) Garlock. c Albert R. Harrison. c Eli H. Scofield. C Jane (E. H.) Scofield. Nov. c C. F. Hotchkiss, [r.] | c Olivia E.(C.F.) Hotchkiss, [r.] J ^^^ ^°^ ^^ c Marion 0. Hotchkiss, (now Mrs. A. J. Nichols.) c Margaret Moffat. c Nancy Crone. Hannah (Joseph H.) Smith. 2. Admitted by professiou, in 1856. Dismissed, September, 1858. Returned the let- ter in August, 1859, and was re-admitted to South Church. Dismissed again in 1864, to a Church in Canada. 3. Admitted by profession, in 1855. Dismissed in 1359, to a Church in Northampton. Returned certificates in March, 1860, and were re-admitted to South Church. 4. Admitted by letter, November 8, 1852. Dismissed, August 3, 1853, to a Church in New Britain. Re-admitted to South Church, March, 1860. Mr. Barrett was killed in the battle of Fredericksburg, December 13, 1862. Mrs. B. was dismissed again, April 19, 1864, and joined College Street Church. 5. Admitted by profession, February, 1853. Dismissed to Congregational Church in Waubonsee, Kansas, in May, 1859. Re-admitted to South Church, November. 1860. 20 GENERAL LIST OF MEMBERS. Mary M. Stowe. Aun (Capt. Wm.) Bates. 1861. Sept. Thomas T. Minor. Nov. c George W. Hazel, [r.] ) c Julietta (George W.) Hazel, [r.] \ ^'^ ^"^^ ^■ 1862. Jan. c Lucy A. Swectland, (now Mrs. Ed. Gillette.) c Henry Up.son. Edna M. "Walker, (now Mrs. Dibble.) March. Agues McDonald. July. Mary E. (Capt. Frederick S.) Ward, c Edward Cos. c Louisa A. (Edward) Coe. Julia A. (Edwin W.) Treat. Sept. Mary Cordelia (M. Dorter) Snell. Edna S. (Joseph) Gray. Nov. Ann E. (George) Deming. 1863. January. Sarah Moffat. Elizabeth M. Bishop. Ella M. Hotchkiss. Anna D. Hotchkiss. Bettie Lee. Agnes Baird. Emma Jane Minor. Jennie E. Minor. Theresa E. Burnett. Mary J. Blair. Martha Duel!. . ^ Mary C. Deming. Carrie E. BurwoU. 6. Admitted by profiHsion, June 6, 1858. Dismissed to Howe Street Churcli, June 11,1861. Re-admitted to South Church, in November, same year. Dismissed again, by general letter, July 1, 1863. GENERAL LIST OF MEMBERS. 21 C Wilbur Johnson. C Leicester A. Carrington. c Laura A. (Leicester A.) Carriugton. March.c Juliette Bonney. Edwin W. Treat. Mary L. Lockwood. Joseph H. Smith. George Petrie. Louisa E. Bryan, c Lafayette S. Comstock. c Hannah M. (Lafayette S.) Comstock. Josephine Hollister. May. Ellen M. Minor. C Huldah Jennings. William H. Deming. Pulaski Leeds. c Andrew Moffat. C Mary Mofiat. Huldah Scott, (now Mrs. Benjamin.) Gilbert Moore. July, c Juha (Elias) Hotchkiss. c Joseph G. Ishani. C Christina (Joseph G.) Isham. John B. Isham. Sept. c Josephine B. Clark, [r.] See Note 7. 1864. January. Louisa (Nicholas) Countryman. Franklin Countrj-man. Sarah (Frederick) Grant. March. Samuel Brace. c Sarah R. (Samuel) Brace. C M. Porter Suell. Martha C. (Ralph V.) Kent. Sarah A. Webster, (now Mrs. Geo. Petrie.) 7. Admitted by profession, June 5, 1853. Dismissed to a Church in Scotland, Dec. 3, 1860. Re-admitted to South Church, in September, 1863. 22 GENERAL LIST OF MEMBERS. Jane (John) Magie. Josepli Gray. Thomas Horsfall, Jr. May. Samuel L. Hawkins. Laura (Samuel L.) Hawkins. Caroline S. (Alvin L.) Willougliby. July. R. "W. Wright. Sarah Louisa (R. W.) Wright. Marie Antoinette Kingsbury. Adelaide [w] Louisa Lyon. Sept. Margaret (Frederick) Veitch. Nov. John D. Tyler. Mrs. Arm E. Mersham. Sarah I. (H. D.) Smith. Eleanor [widow of Bennett] Caldwell. Jane A. Supple. C Martha Jane Hubbard, [r.] See Note 8. 8. Admitted by certificate, November 8, 1852. August 3, 1864, took a letter to tho Second Congregational Church in Fair Haven. Returned it in November, same year, and was re-admitted to South Church. GENERAL LIST OF MEMBERS. 23 RECAriTULATION BY FIGURES. Yea7: Profession. 1852 .5 1853, 26 1854, 17 1855, 35 1856, 13 1857, , 8 1858, 28 1859, 4 1860, 4 1861, 1 1862, 7 1863, 24 1864, 22 194 Deduct for re-admissions, 12 Certificate, 154 Profession, 194 Certificate. Total. 32 37 21 47 15 32 19 54 10 23 8 16 15 43 6 10 17 21 2 3 4 11 14 38 3 25 166 360 ... 12 12 348 Total, 343 It is proper to remarlc, that quite a number of persons, especially since the action of the late ex-parte Council, have been admitted by profession, who had before been members of other churches. Of the twelve re-admissions, two occurred in 1859, six in 1860. two in 1861, one in 1863, and one in 1864. PRESENT MEMBERS. ALPHABETICAL LLST OF MEMBEES, JANUARY 1, 1865. Note. — The fisures Ijefote the name, denote the year when the ppr-^on wtus admit- ted to this Church. A. 1859.— Abbott, Mary M. B. 1854. — Baird, Jane, wife of Adam. 1856. — Baird, Margaret, wife of David. 1856. — Baird, Jennette, wife of Hugh. 1856. — Baird, Andrew. 1856. — Jane A., wife of Andi'ew. 1858. — Baird, Sarah, wife of James. 1858.— Baird, Isabella. 1859. — Baird, Agues, widow of Archibald. 1863.— Baird, Agnes. 1860. — Bates, Ann, wife of William. 18G3. — Benjamin, Huldah Scott. ] 855. — Bevins, Cornelia. 1855. — Bevins, Mary Helen, 1855.— Bishop, Hester. 1863.— Bishop, Elizabeth M. 1863. — Blair, Mary Jane. 1856.— Bowns, Sarah T. 3 26 ALP^ABRTTfAI, LIST. .1 863. — Bonney, Juliette. 1864. — Brace, Samuel. 1864. — Sarah R., wife of Samuel. 1856. — Bryan, Mary, wife of Ira. 1857.— Bryan, Mary A. 1857. — Bryan, Lucy Jane. 1858. — Bryan, James A. 1863. — Bryan, Lousa E. 1855. — Buchanan, James. 1855. — Ann, wife of James. 1854. — Burnett, Lindley Monroe. 1852. — Burwell, Dolly, widow of Deacon Benedict. C. 1864. — Caldwell, Eleanor, widow of Bennett. 1856. — Catlin, Jane, wife of William B. 1857. — Catlin, Maria, wife of Henry S. 1857.— Clark, Frances M. 1853. — Clark, Josephine B. 1852.— Coffin, Lucy. 1858. — Corbett, Eliza Hare, wife of Robert. 1853. — Countryman, Nicholas. 1863. — Louisa, wife of Nicholas. 1863. — Countryman, Franklin. 1858. — Coggeshall, Martha. 1860. — Crone, Nancy. 1854. — Crosby, Margaret, widow of John. 1858.— Dean, Phebe M. 1858. — Deming, Ann E., wife of George. 1863. — Deming, Mary C. 1863. — Deming, William H. ALPHABETICAL LIST. 27 1853.— Duell, Caleb S. 1853.— Martha C, wife of Caleb S. 1863.— Duell, Martlia. E, 1855. — Evans, John. 1855. — Eliza, wife of John. F. 1855. — Fenn, Ann. 1855. — Foote, Charles B. 1857. — Paulina L. Thof/ipsofi, wife of Charles B. 1853. — Foote, Caroline E. Allei/, wife of George S. 1859. — Francis, Martha O. 1856. — Fulton, Charlotte E., wife of Thomas H. G. 1856. — Grant, Frederick. 1864. — Sarah, wife of Frederick. 1858. — Goodrich, Martha Stewart, wife of John. 1864. — Gray, Joseph. 1862. — Edna S., wife of Jose^Ji. H. 1854. — Hallock, Gerard. 1852.— Eliza, wife of Gerard. 1855.— Hallock, Rev. William A. 1855.— Hanson, Cornelia E. Taylor, wife of Thomas. 1858.— Hart, Elizabeth S. Biidl. 1864. — Hawkins, Samuel L. 1864. — Laura L., wife of Samuel L. 1855. — Hayes, Mary E. Hard, wife of Frank. 1855.— Hill, Mary. 1863. — Hollister, Josephine. 28 ALPHABETICAL LIST. 1855.— Hollis, Susan B., wife of Thomas C. 1852.— Horsfall, Thomas. 1852. — Sarah G., wife of Thomas. 1858.— Horsfall, Sarah L. 1864.— Horsfall, Thomas, Jr. 1852. — Hotchkiss, Ami M., wife of Stephen, Jr. 1852. — Hotchkiss, Lucy. 1852. — Hotchkiss, Harriet. 1853.— Hotchkiss, Charles F. 1853. — Olivia E., wife of Charles F. 1863. — Hotchkiss, Julia, wife of Elias. 1863.— Hotchkiss, Ella M. 1863. — Hotchkiss, Annie D., wife of Frederick T. 1852.— Hubbard, William M. 1852. — Hubbard, Martha Jane. 1853.— Hull, Porter G. 1854. — Hunter, Mary E., widow of William G. 1855.— Hull, Harriet F., wife of William. I. 1863. — Isham, Joseph G. 1863. — Christina B., wife of Joseph G. 1863. — Isham, .7ohn B. J. 1863. — Jennings, Huldah. K. 1863. — Keeler, Carrie E. Burwcll, wife of Morris. 1864.— Kent, Martha C, wife of Kalph V. 1864. — Kingsbury, Marie Antoinette. L. 1859.— Latta, Robert. 1859. — Elizabeth, wife of Robert. ALPHABETICAL LIST. 29 1863.— Lee, Bettie. 1855. — Leeds, John H. 1855.— Frances A. Hluc, wife of John H. 1863.— Leeds, Pulaski. 1863. — Lockwood, Mary L., wife of Edgar. 1864. — Lyon, [w] Adelaide Louisa. M. 1862.— McDonald, Agnes, (under discipline.) 1864. — Magie, Jane, wife of John D. 1858. — McNeill, Jessie Ann Torbetf, wife of Alario. 1858.— McPhee, Jane. 1853. — Martin, Eliza J., widow of Isaac. 1858— Martin, Susan. 1856.— ^lansfield, Mrs. Betsey A. 1852.— ilinor, Alfred. ] 863.— Minor, Ellen M. 1853.— MLx, John T. 1864. — Mershani, Mrs. Ann E. N. 1853. — Xelsun, John C. 1853.— Elizabeth, wife of Joliu ('. I860.— Nichols, Marion O. HotcUls.^, wile of A. J. O. 1853.— Owen, Tliomas. 1853. — Josephine, wife of Tiiomas. P. 1855.— Parsons, Sarah Jane Magle, wife of 0. F 1863. — Petrie, George. 1864— Sarah A. WchsUr, wife of George. 18.').3._Phelps, Nancy M.. wife of Erastus. 3* 30 ALPHABETICAL LIST. R. 1854. — Ruwliiig, Mary A. Smith, wife of Benjamin. S. 1856. — Scofield, Edgar. 1856. — Lavinia A., wife of Edgar. 1864. — Smith, Sarali Jaue, wife of Horatio D. 1864.— Snell, M. Porter. 1862.— Mary Cordelia, wife of M. Porter. 1852. — Steele, Catharine McCaim, [w] of Robert. 1864. — Supple, Jane A. T. 1855. — Tisdale, Lucina S., [w.] 1858. — Torbett, James. 1858. — Ann, wife of James. 1863.— Treat, Edwin W. 1862. — Julia A., wife of Edwin. 1864.— Tyler, John D. . ' V. 1864. — Veitch, Margaret, wife of Frederick. W. 1860. — Wallace, John. 1855.— Warner, Charles H. 1855.— Sarah M., wife of Charles H, 1853.— White, Abby, wife of John. 1864. — Willoughby, Caroline S., wife of Alvin L. 1855.— AVi they, Pascal. 1855. — Lucy, wife of Pascal. 1857.— Wright, Margaret. 1864.— Wright, Robert W. 1«64. — Sarah Louisa, wife of Robert W. ALPHABETICAL LIST. 31 Y. 1855. — Youngermaii, George. 1855. — Emma B., wife of George. Total in the above list of present members, 15.3, — viz. 41 males, and 112 females. Of the whole number, 107 were received on profession of their faith, and 46 by cer- tificate from other churches. To ascertain whether any particular person was admitted by certificate or by profes- sion, see General List of Members, under the year meu- tioned at the beginning of the name concerning which the information is sought. PAST MEMBERS. ALPHABETICAL LIST Of Pvrsoiis icho HAVE BEEN Members of the South Church, hut are not not so January 1, 1865. Note.— The fig:urcs which immediately precede the name, denote the year of admission. If the month is wanted, see General List, under the year mentioned. The day of the month can be ascertained by referring to an A'manac, as no persons iire admitted except at Communions, and these are always held on the first Sabbath of the month. The fig-ures opposite the name, on the right, show the date of dismission ;. the middle column, the mode of dismission, or place of removal, or both. The letter (ir) immediately before the date of dismission, denotes that the person so designated was dismissed by ^e«e?c; certificate; the letter (1), that he left this Church without askiug or receiving a certificate from us. Those removed by death, are marked with a * immediately preceding the date when they ceased to be members ; those by discipline, with a (d) ; those without any letter or mark immediately preceding such date, were dismissed by certificate to some par- ticular church or churches. 1855, Adams, Alexander, 1855, Ailing, Augusta, 1859, Ailing, Ira, 1859, Ailing, Hannah, 1858, Ailing, Waldemir B. 1853, Armstrong, P0II3', 1853, Augur, Emily B. 1855, Augur, Horace A. 1855, Fannie E., wife of do. 1852, Barrett, Thomas E., Killed in battle, *Dec. 13, 1862 1852, Jane S. Bunudl, [w] of do.College st. ch. Apr. 19, 1864 1852, Barrett, [w] Nancy L., Ch.iuW.Killiugly, Xov.25, 1863 1853, Barrett, Henry M. Died, *July 26, 1861 Mar. 29, 1857 Ch.in W. Haveu, Apr. 30, 1861 Died, *Xov. 11, 1861 Howe St. Ch., Mar. 11, 1862 Died, *Dec. 31, 1858 Died, *Jan. 1, 1859 Jomed Bapt.ch. (1) Mar. 26, 1854 CoUege St. ch. Dec. 16, 1863 do. Dec. 16, 1863 34 PAST MEMBERS. 1854, Barrett, Oriy:eu A. Died, *July 29, 1854 1853, Beers, Jauies H., Pres. ch. Brooklyn, July 2, 1856 1854, Celia Hall, [w] of do. do. July 2, 185G 1852, Beldeii, E. Porter, Pres.ch.SingSing, Dec. 17, 1854 1852, Eliza A., wife of do. do. dc ). Dec. IT, 1854 1855, Bsnce, Thomas, Discipline, (d) Jan. 10, 1862 1855, Sarah, wife of do. do (d)Jan. 10,1862 1855, Benedict, Lucy Jane, College St. ch. June 2, 1861 1855, Benhara, Christiaua Young,{Th..'il .)Died, *Nov. 5, 1859 1853, BiU, George K, Exeter ch. Leb I'n, June 22, 1858 IS 54, Amelia L., wife of do. Died, *Feb., 1856 1853, Blair, Mary E. wife of Robert, College St. ch. April 19, 1864 1853, Bradley, George, do. do. March 24, 1863 1853, Lovisa, wife of do. do. do. March 24, 1863 1855, Bristol, Eliza H., Third ch., About Feb. 2, 1858 1858, Bunnell, Mary E., St. Paul's ch. Dec. 1, 1861 1853, Burnett, James L., College St. ch. March 24, 1863 1853, Juliette, wife of do. do. March 24, 1863 1858, Burnett, James II., do. March 3, 1863 1859, Ellen F. Corey, wife of do. do. March 3, 1863 1858, Burnett, Preston B., do. March 24, 1863 1858, Burnett, Laura, do. March 24, 1863 1863, Burnett, Theresa E. do. March 24, 1863 1852, Burwell, Caroline W. Third ch., (1) Nov. 22, 1864 1852, Burwell, Deacon Benedict, Died, *April 14, 1863 1852, Burwell, Charles B., Third ch. Dec. 16, 1863 1852, Harriet A., wife of do do. Dec. 16, 186.". 1858, Butricks, Geo. H., College St. ch. Feb. 5, 1864 1858, Sophia, wife of do. do. Feb. 5, 1864 1855, , Butricks, Minot A., do. (1) Nov. 22, 1864 1855, Charlotte A. Churchill,w\(c of do. do. (1) Nov. 22, 1864 o. 1854, Cadwell, Deborah, (Johu L.,) 1863, Carringtou, Leicester, 1863, Emily, wife of do, 1852, Chapman, James V. R., 1854, Chapman, Lewis, Ch.in Woodljury, Apr. 26, 1859 College St. ch. {\) Nov. 22, 1864 do. (1) Nov. 22, 1864 Pr. ch. Rochester, Jan. 17, 1860 do Jan. 17, 1860 PAST MEMBERS. .35 1853, Cbidsey, Lydia G., ] 862, Coe, Edward, 1 862, Louisa A., wife of do. 1856, Coggeshall, James, 1853, Collinson, Margaret, 1863, Comstock, Lafayette S., 1863, Hannah M., wife of do, 1854, Crosby, John, 1852, Currier, Augusta TV., Discipline,- (d) Dec. 20, 1861 OoUege St. ch. (1) Nov. 22, 1864 do. (l)Nov. 22, 1864 Died, *April 24, 1857 A ch. in Canada, 1853 Chapel St. ch. (g) Aug. 4, 1863 do, (g) Aug. 4, 1863 Died, *Aug. 6, 1863 College St. ch. (g) July 31, 1863 D. 1854, Dailey, Charles E., Ch. in Was. City, Aug. 26, 1862 1855, Dailey, Henry C, Ch. in Unionville, Aug. 26, 1862 1853, Deming, Laura E. Eussell. wife of L. P. Deming, (g) Aug. 11, 1863 ] 862, Dibble, Edna M. Walker, College st. ch. March 8, 1864 1854, Douglass, David, Presb. ch. Rock L June, 1S55 1855, Dj-as, Robert, Chapel st.ch. (1) Nov. 22, 1864 E. 1858, Eddy, Jennette, 1855, Edwards, Ann, wife of Wm. Dav. Chapel, (1) Nov. 22, 1864 March 29, 1857 F. 1855, Fowler, [w] Julia, Ch. in Guilford, Oct. 26, 1858 1855, Fowler, Sarah, do. Oct. 26, 1858 1857, Frisbie, Rev. A. L., Ch. in Ansonia, May, 1860 G-. 1867,* Gaskill, Sarah D.. Ch. in Norwich, Jan. 3, IS 61 1857, Gaskill, Laura E., St. Paul's AprH 9, 1861 1860, Garlock, John R., Geo. St. Me. ch. Aug. 12, 1862 1860, Catharine G. B., wife of do. do. Aug. 12, 1862 1858, Ga3dord, Elias, Ch. in Cheshire, May 13, 1862 1858, Mary Ann, , wife of do. do. May 13, 1862 1858, Gillette, Edward, Davenp. Chapel, Oct. 22, 1862 1858, Ann F., wife of do. Died, *July 23, 1862 1862, L.A.^reree'iy 31, 1863 1852, Judith M., wife of do. do. (g) J"iy3i, 1863 1852, Minor, George S. do. (g) July 31, 1863 1854, Minor, Lucy B., Died, *Sept. 28, 1857 1861, Minor, Thomas T., Coll. St. ch. (g) July 31, 1863 1863, Minor, Jennie E., do. (g) July 31, 1863 1863, Minor, Emma Jane, (g) Aug. 4, 1863 1857, Munson, Maria K., Ch. in W. Haven, May 7, 1801 1858, Morris, Fidelia Taylw (Theodore ) Ch. in S.Canaan, Oct. 28, 1862 1858, Moffat, Catharine, Coll. St. ch. (1) Xov. 22 1864 1860, Moffat, Margaret, do. (1) Nov. 22, 1864 1863, Moffat, Sarah, do. (1) Xov. 22, 1864 1863, Moffat, Andrew B., do. (1) Nov. 22, 1864 1863, Moffat, Mary, do. (1) Nov. 22, 1864 1803, Moore, Gilbert F., do. (1) Nov. 22, 1864 1853, Nettleton, Geo. W., Howe st. ch. March 11, 1862 1853 Charlotte, wife of do. do. March 11, 1862 1856, Nicoll, John, College st. ch. (g) Aug. 4, 1863 1856, Cornelia C, wife of do. do. (g) Aug. 4, 1863 1854, Noyes, Agues, (Eev. G. W., ) F. Haven, 2d, (g) June 11, 1861 P. 1854, Pliillips, Charles, Died, *Oct. IS, 1861 1854, Patty, wife of do. Howe st. ch. March 11, 1862 1855, Picket, Rufus S., College st. ch. March 17, 1863 1855, Catharine, wife of do. do. March 17, 1863 1859, Pierson, Lydia, (John.) (g) Sept. 1861 1854, Pomeroy, Elizabeth, (Chas. B.) Ch.inWebster,Mass. Nov., 1854 1854, Pond, Chester E., Kansas, (g) March 18, 1856 1854, Mary Scott, wife of do. do. (g) March 18, 1856 4 38 PAST MEMBERS. 1852, Porter, Wm. S., 1852, Jane B.. wife of do. 1853, Porter, Clarissa C, College St. ch. April 1, 1856 do. April 1, 1856 do. Nov. 1854 1855 1855 1855 1856. 1860 1860, 185t 1857 1853 1857 1857 1852 1852 18G3 1860 1858; 1858, 1856, 1856, 1856 185 a 1853 1853 1860 1855 1856 s. Scobie, [w] Jane L., Scobie, Wm. C, Amelia, wife of do. Scofield, John W., Scofield, Eli H., Jane, wife of do. Scranton, Wm. E., Sarah E , wife of do. Severance, [w] Mary, Shumway, Charles M., Mary J., wife of do. Smith, Amos, Maria, wife of do. Smith, Jos. H., Hannah, wife of do. Staples, Ezra, Vesta, wife of do. Steele, James, Jessie, wife of do. Stetson, John, Pr. Harriet, wife of do. Stewart, Henry L., SSrah E.. wife of do. Stowe, Mary M., Stuart, Mary, Street, Susan J., Died, *Nov. 1. 1856 College St. ch. (1) Nov. 22, 1864 do. (1) Nov. 22, 1864 College St. ch. Jan. 19, 1864 Davenport Chapel, July 2, 1862 do. July 2, 1862 Me. ch. Geo. st. Jan. 26, 1858 do. Jan. 26, 1858 Ch. in Mass., 1856 (g) Jan. 3, 1861 (g) Jan. 3, 1861 College St. ch. (l)Nov. 22, 1864 do. (1) Nov. 22, 1864 do. (1) Nov. 22, 1864 do. (1) Nov. 22, 1864 Ch.Farmi'gt'n,Me.,Dec.24, 1861 do. Dec. 24, 1861 Discipline, (d) Jan. 21, 1863 do. (d) Jan. 21, 1863 ch. Brooklyn, ) M^.^ch 12, 1861. do. ) Ep. ch. M. Had.,(g)Aug. 1, 1860 Died, *June 20, 1855 Ch in Milford, May 14, 1861 (g) Aug. 26,1856 Third ch., Feb. 2, 1858 1854, Thomas, Sarah M. (Ransom H.) Ch. in Wcstville, 1864 1853, Thomas, Evan, North Church, Dec. 1853 1853, Jane, wife of do. do. Dec. 1853 1853, Thompson [w] Harriet S , Howe st. eh., Nov. 19, 1857 PAST MEMBERS. 39 185:5, Terrill, Jano S. Price, Cli. in Hamden, May 3, 1864 3856, Tyrrell, [w] Arabella, Cliurch in Canada, Aug., 1864 IT. 1858, Umbcrfield, Louisa B. Tuitle, (Dennis,) Chapel st. ch. Oct. 28, 1862 1862, Upson, Rev. Henry, Ch. N. Preston, Feb. 12, 1864 ^W. 1860, Walker, Plenrietta E., College st. ch. April 26, 1864 1852, Ward, Mrs. Mary, (John,) 1861 1854, Ward, Mary M., wife of Charles, Chapel st. church, 1860 1862, Ward, Mary E., (Capt. F. S.,) College st. ch. (g) July 31, 1863 1860, Williams, Abby S., Con. ch. Newark, May 28, 1861 1860, Williams, Polly, do. May 28, 1861 1854, Wilkinson, John, Coll. st. ch. (1) Nov. 22, 1864 1854, Elizabeth, wife of do. do. (1) Nov. 22, 1864 1854, Wilson, Julia V. Phelps, (Jo. W.) Ch. inNorwalk, AprU 23, 1861 1858, Woodruff, Polly, College st. ch. May 2, 1863 1858, Woodruff, Martha B. do May 2, 1863 1858, Woodruff, Mary T., do. May 2, 1863 1852, Wriglit, Sar. M. IltMard, (W.A.) Fair Haven 2dch. Apr. 30, 1856 1857, Young, Reugeno L., Chapel st. ch. Dec. 16, 1862 1858, Young, Lucy P., (g) Dec. 16, 1862 40 PAST MEMBERS. RECAPITULATION. Number of names in tlie foregoing list of ex- members, - 195 Males, 72 Females, -__ _-123 Of the whole number, (195,) eighty-seven were admitted by profession, and one hundred and seven by certificate. Of the same whole num- ber, there were dismissed by certificate from this to other churches, 116 By general letter, (g) __ 26 By discipline, (d) — 5 By death, (*) 22 Joined other churches, without asking or receiv- ing certificates of dismission from us, (1) 26 Total, as above, 195 Of the 26 thus (1) separated from us, it is under- stood that 25 received a certificate from the Scribe of the late Ex-parte Council, Kev. Mr. Eustis, and that on the strength of that certificate, they have been admitted to other churches, as specified in the above list. Most of them were admitted to the College Street Church, August 7, 1864. In regard to these 25 persons, the following preamble and resolution were unanimously adopted at the annual meeting of the South Church, November 22, 1864 :— PAST MEMBERS. 41 " AVhereas, we are credibly informed that Amos Smith, and Maria, his wife, Edward Coe, and Louisa A., his wife, Leicester Carrington, and Emily, his wife, Miuot A. Bnt- ricks, and Charlotte A., his wife, Joseph II. Smith, and Plannah, his wife, William C. Scobie, and Amelia, his wife, John "Wilkinson, and Elizabeth, his wiiv, Andrew li, Moffat; Marsxaret, Catharine, Mary and Sarah jMof- fat; Gilbert F. Moore, Jennette Eddy, Catharine C. Jones, Caroline W. Bm-well, Eobert Dyas, and Seth Gil- lette, whose names stand on our books as members of this Church, have united with other churches, without asking letters of dismission from us, as was required l)y one of our Standing Rules, to which they were parties, "Resolved, That notwithstanding the irregularity of their course in this particular, we accept it as at least an expression of their desire to be released from their conuec- tion with this Church, and that accordingly our Clerk be directed to enter their names on our Records as dismissed memhers from this date, (November 22, 1864,) in the same sense as if they had asked and received from us letters of dismission and recommendation, in the usual form." DISMISSIONS IN EACH YEAR, AND NAMES OF THE DISMISSED. Note.— Deceased Members marked with a *. Those who have died since their dis- mission, are not ijiarkfd witli a *. 1852. None. 1853. Margaret Collinsoii, i Amelia Hotclikiss,* Evan Thomas, Jane (Evan) Thomas. 1854. E. Torter Belden, Eliza (E. P.) Belden, Origeu A. Barrett,* Emily B. Augur, Henry Judson, Clarissa 0. Porter, Elizabeth (Chas. B.) T'omeroy. 1855. David Douglass, John H. Leeds, Frances A. Hhic (.T. H.) Tweeds. Grace G. Mason,* Sarah E. Stewart.* 1856. James H, Beers, Celia Hall (J. TT.) Beers. L. Amelia (Geo. R.) Bill,* Marilla [w] Hall, Louisa Hall, Marietta Hall, David H. Hine, Susan Carringto7i (D.H.) Hine, Mary (Stephen, Sr.)Hotchkiss,* Wm. S. Porter, Jane B. (Wm. S.) Porter, Chester E. Pond, Mary Scott (Chester E.) Pond, Mary [w] Severance, Mrs. Mary Yn Merrow, Amos Smith, Mary L. Stewart, Jane L. [w] Scobie,* Sarah M. Ilnhhard Wright. 1857. Alexander Adams, James Coggeshall,* Ann Edwards, Isaac Martin,* Lucy B. Minor,* Harriet S. [w] Thompson. , Elizalicth Knnx-. 44 DISMISSIONS IN EACH YEAR. 1858. "Waldemir B. Ailing,* Thomas E. Barrett, Jane S. (Thos. E.) Barrett, George E. Bill, Julia Fowler, Sarah Fowler, Frank E. Hotchkiss, Wm. E. Scrantou, Sarali E. (Wm. E.) Scranton, Eliza H. Bristol, Arabella [wj Tyrrell, Susan J. Street. 1859. Polly AiTastrong,* Clu'istiaua Young (T. H.) Ben- ham,* Charlotte A. Cailwell, Deborah Cadwell, Charles A. Hotchldss, Ellen Jeffi'ies, Lewis M. Mills, Charlotte I. (Lewis M.) Mills, Maria L. :\rills, Charles F. Hotchkiss, Olivia E. (Chas.F.) Hotchkiss. 1860. James V. R. Chapman, Lewis Chapman, Rev. A. L. Frisbie, Harvey ^Merchant, Catliarinc C. (Harvey) ^Fcr- rliant. Mary M. (Charles) Ward, Heniy L. Stewart, Josephine B. Clark, 186L Augusta Ailing, Ira Ailing,* Henry M. Barrett,* Lucy Jane Benedict, Mary E. Bunnell, Lydia G. Chidsey, Sarah D. Gaskill, Laura E. Gaskill, Catharine (Seth) Gillette,=^ George W. Hazel, Juliette Currier (George W.) Hazel, Harriet J. (Wm. ^l.) Hub- bard,* Eliz. W. McArthur, Wm. Merwin, Lucy (Wm.) Merwin, Emily 0. Merwin, Mary E. Merwin, Maria K. Munson, Agnes W. Xoyes, Charles Phillips,* Lydia (John) Pierson, Charles M. Shumway, Mary J. (Chas. M.) Shumway, Ezra Staples, Vesta (Ezra) Staples, John Stetson, Harriet (John) Stetson, DISMISSIONS IN EACH YEAR. 45 Mary M. Stowe, Mary (John) Ward, Abby S. Williams, Polly Williams, Julia V. Phelps Wilson. 1862. Hannah Ailing, March 11. John R. Garlock, Aug. 12. Catharine G. B. (John R.) Gar- lock, Aug. 12. Elias Gay lord, May 13. Mary Ann (Elias) Gaylord, May 13. Thomas E. Barrett,* Dec. 13. Thomas Bence, Jan. 10. Sarah (Thos.) Bence, Jan. 10. Charles E. Dailey, Aug, 26. Henry 0. Dailey, Aug. 26. Wm. Henry Hazel, January. Edward Gillette, Oct. 22. Ann F. (Edward) Gillette,* July 23. Lucy A. Sweetla7id (Edward) Gillette, Oct. 28. Lydia M. Lord, June 24. J^'idelia Taylor Morris, Oct. 28. Geo. W. Nettleton, March 11. Charlotte (Geo. W.) Nettleton, BEarch 11. Patty (Chas.) Phillips, Mar. 11. Eli. H. Scofield, July 2. Jane (Eli H.) Scofield, July 2. Louisa B. Tuttlc Umberfield, Oct. 28. Reugene L. Young, Dec. 16. Lucy P. Young, Dec. 16. 1863. Horace A. Augur, Fannie E. (Horace A.) Augur, Nancy L. Barrett, Geo. Bradley, Lovisa (Geo.) Bradley, James L. Burnett, Juliette (James L.) Burnett, James H. Burnett, Ellen F. Corey (James H.) Burnett, Preston B. Burnett, Laura Burnett, Theresa E. Burnett, Dea. Benedict Burwell,* Charles B. Burwell, Harriet A. (Chas. B.) Burwell, Lafayette S. Comstock, Hannah (Lafayette) Comstock, John Crosby,* Augusta W. Currier, Laura E. Russell (L. P.) Dem- ing. Albert R. Harrison, Geo. W. Hazel, Juliette Currier (Geo. W.) Hazel, Dea. E. S. Minor, 46 DISMISSIONS IN EACH YEAR. Judith M. (E. S.) Minor. George S. Minor, Thomas T. Minor, Jennie E. Minor, Emma Jane Minor, John Nicoll, Cornelia C. (John) Nicoll, Rufus S. Pickett, Catharine (Eufus S.) Pickett, James Steele, Jessie (James) Steele, Mary E. (Capt. F. S.) Ward, Polly Woodruff, Martha E. Woodruff, Mary T. Woodruff. 1864. Jane S. Burwell Barrett, Mary E. (Robert) Blair, Caroline W. Burwell, Geo. H. Butricks, Sophia (G. H.) Butricks, Minot A. Butricks, Charlotte A. (Minot) Butricks, Leicester Carrington, Emily (Leicester) Carrington, Edward Coe, Louisa A. (Edward) Coe, Edna M. Walker Dibble, Robert Dyas, Jenette Eddy, Martha J. Hubbard, Aug. 23. Seth Gillette, Wilbur Johnson, Catharine C. Jones, Charlotte Macomber, Catharine Moffat, Margaret Moffat, Sarah Moffat, Andrew B. Moffat, Mary Moffat, Gilbert Moore, Amos Smith, Maria (Amos) Smith, Joseph H. Smith, Hannah (Joseph H.) Smith, Sarah Maria (Ransom H.) Thomas, Jane S. Price Terrill, Rev. Henry Upson, Henrietta E. Walker, Wm, C. Scobie, Amelia (Wm. C.) Scobie, John Wilkinson. Elizabeth (John) Wilkinson, John W. Scofield, Arabella (w) Tyrrell. NUMEEICAL EXHIBIT OP ADMISSIONS AND DISMISSIONS IN DIFFER- ENT YEARS. The following table shows the total number of admis- sions and dismissions, (including deaths,) in each calendar year, since the organization of the church to Jan. 1, 1865. Year. Admissions. Dismissions . Gain. Loss. Whole No. at close of year. 1852. 37 37 37 1853. 47 4 43 80 1854. 32 7 25 105 1855. 54 5 49 154 1856. 23 19 4 158 1857. 16 7 9 -0 167 1858. 43 12 31 198 1859. 10 11 1 197 1860. 21 8 13 210 1861. 3 32 20 181 1862. 11 24 13 168 1863. 38 39 1 167 1864. 25 39 14 153 Total admissions, 360 207 211 58 " dismissions, 207 Loss !, 58 153 net gain. Present Members, 153 The number of admissions (360) is twelve greater than the number of j^ersons admitted (348). The reason is, that twelve persons have been admitted twice ; having, at some period after their first admission, taken certificates to other churches, and subsequently re-united with this. For the same reason the number of dismissioyis is twelve greater 48 ADMISSIONS AND DISMISSIONS. than the number of i^ersons dismissed. But in this table, as well as in the General List, it is necessary to follow these changes, in order to show the gain or loss of members in each year, and the number remaining at the close of each year. In the Alphabetical Lists no name is inserted more than once. Mr. Carroll commenced his labors as Stated Supply on the 1st of June, 1862. During the 31 months which have since elapsed, to 1st of January, 1865, there have been admitted into this church by profession 51 members, by certificate 19,— total 70; which is only 23 less than the number of dismissions within the same period, including two by discipline and four by death. Considering the ex- traordinary efforts which have been made by disaffected persons within our own church, and by terrorism, Ex-parte Councils, and other appliances without, to draw or di'ive away our members, — indeed to destroy us altogether, — W\q result is a signal triumph. As these elements of mischief are now in a great measure exhausted, it is reasonable to anticipate, from this time forward, with the blessing of Grod, a rapid increase of members, proportionate to the large increase of our congregations. It is also worthy of remark that our net loss of members (23) in the 31 months of Mr. Carroll's ministry among us, is eleven less than our net loss (34) during the seventeen months immediately preceding. On the whole, we have much to be thankful for in the past, and more to hope for in the future. The faithful preaching of the Word, which the South Church enjoys in an eminent degree, is sure to yield its legitimate fruits. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY Los Angeles This book is DUE on the last date stamped below. 20m-7,'67(H3149s4) UC SOUTHERM REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY AA 000 737 291 5 t PLEA«?: DO NOT REMOVE THIS BOOK CARD ] ^Hmmo/: ^(!/0JnV3JO'^ University Research Library EX •I37S72h X M I 1. ^ A- V