;.■;.; MEMOIRS OF THE GEOLOGICAL SURYEY. GN , 77^ ENGLAND AND WALES. UC-NRLF OX THE B3110bbS ^^ I MANUFACTURE OF GUN-FLINTS, THE METHODS OF EXCAVATING FOE FLL\T, THE AGE OF PAL EOLITHIC M IN, AND 11 THE CONNEXION BETWEEN NEOLITHIC ART ■■ ■! AND THE GUN-FLiNT TRADE. :, -■■■. ' !l rv SYDNEY B. J. SKERTCHLY, F.G.S. rUBLISHED BY ORDER OF TUB LORDS COMMISSIONERS OP HER SI.VJCSTv'S TRiC VSURT. V LONDON: PRINTED FOR HER MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE. AKU SOLD BY Longman & Co., Paternoster Row ; Tbubner & Co., Ludgate Hill j Letts & Son, 33, King William Street; Edward Stanford, 55, Charing Cross ; and J. Wyld, 12, Charing Cross : ALSO BY Messrs. Johnston, 4, St. Andrew Squane, Edinburgh; 'Lodges, Foster, & Co., 104, Grafton Street, and A. Trio.^r, Abbey Street, Dublin. •0 C\| 1879. (3 Price Seventeen Shillings and Sixpence. .«. O >- / MEMOIRS OF THE GE0L0GIC.41 SUllTEY. ENGLAND AND WALES. ON THE MANUFACTURE OF GUN-FLINTS, THE METHODS OF EXCAVATING FOR FLINT, THE AGE OF PALEOLITHIC MAN, AND THE CONNEXION BETWEEN NEOLITHIC ART AND THE GUN-FLINT TRADE. BT SYDNEY B. J. SKERTCHLY, F.G.S. ^y^.rKr\r\.-\ V i^>\/^•^_'^^^ /* PUBLISHED BY ORDER OF THE LORDS COMMISSIONERS OF HER MAJESTY'S TREASURY. , e « • • LONDON: PRINTED FOR HER MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE, AND SOLD BY Longman & Co., Paternoster Row; Tbubner & Co., Ludgate Hill; Letts & Sox, 33, King William Street ; Edward Stanford, 55, Charing Cross ; and J. Wyld, 12, Charing Cross : ALSO BY Messrs. Johnston, 4, St. Andrew Square, Edinburgh ; Hodges, Foster, & Co., 104, Grafton Street, and A. Thom, Abbey Street, Dublin. 1879. Price Seventeen Shillings and Sixpence. \o G^'x w NOTICE. In this memoir Mr, Skcrtclily seems to liave clearly established the circumstance that the inamifactiire of flint implements has been continuously carried on from what iireoloo-ists have called Neolithic times down to the present day, for gun-flints are still manufactured at Erandon for the African market, and among some uncivilised tribes stone weapons are still in use, while by the Digger Indians of California stone ari'ow heads are made, though some years ago they preferred to make them from the thick bottoms of old porter bottles, a fact for which I am indebted to the personal obser- vation of Mr. John Arthur Phillips. Mr. Skertchly mentions that at Brandon the imple- ments were the work of the inhabitants of our country before the Aryan race migrated hither, and this is likely to have generally been the case, for it is known that the Aryan races were acquainted with metals and used armour. It is, however, on record that in the Shetland islands stone knives were made and used down to quite a late period. If it be difficult or impossible to guess with any approach to accuracy at the time when Neolithic man began to work in our area, it is still more difficult to estimate the years that have elapsed between the Palseolithic and Neolithic epochs. That man lived in this region in interglacial times I have no doubt, and I also believe it to be most probable that he even inhabited our region in pre-glacial times, and perhaps never fairly left it, but only retired south during tiie general increase of cold, and the gradual advance of the glaciers, and still survived in what is now the south of England. On this subject, however, Mr. Skertchly has had no occasion to enter in the present memoir, Andrew C. Hams ay. Director General. 325151 38856. Wt. 354. IV NOTICE. The following Memoir, by Mr. Skertchly, gives an exhaustive and trustworthy account of an industry which seems to have been carried on at Brandon, and in its immediate neighbourhood, from a very remote period. Though formerly of considerable importance, the art has now become nearly obsolete in consequence of the improvements that have taken jAace in the con- struction of fire-arms, in the earlier history of which the present work may be considered to form an interesting chapter. - It is, also, intended to serve as an explanation of a collection of manufactured flints which has been brought together, through the aid of ]\[r. Skertchly, for the Museum of Practical Geology, each specimen being described and figured in the following pages. In his treatment of the more obscure ethnological and archieological (questions, the opinions of the Author are entitled to every consideration. The j^i'^ctical acquaintance which he has acquired of flint-knapping and working, his close study of the different ways in which flint can be broken, coupled with his intimate knowledge of the geological structure of the country around Brandon, as well as of the deposits in which Pala3olithic imjolements have been found, necessarily impart additional weight and value to his arguments with regard to the geological age of Palaeolithic man ; and also to his endeavours to trace a connexion between Neolithic art and the modern flint manufacture as practised by the Brandon knappers of the present day. The specimens of flints, and the tools and appliances used in their manufacture, have been drawn, on the wood, by Mr. Keda\A^ay, from the objects themselves, and have been engraved by Mr. Shepherd. H. W. Bristow, Senior Director. Geological Survey Office, 28, Jermyu Street, London, S.W., 23rd August 1878. rUEFACE. In this work the manufacture of gun and other flints as carried on at Brandon, is described in greater detail than has before been attempted ; and the value of the study of this branch of industry to geologists is pointed out. The volume is especially descriptive of a very complete series of specimens made under my super- vision for the Museum of Practical Geology by Mr. W. J. Southwell, to whom my best thanks are due, not merely for the care he bestowed upon the specimens, but for the unflagging patience with which he imparted to me day by day most of th-e information herein contained concerning his craft. So far as the Brandon manufacture is concerned, I may claim to have produced a work as free as possible from errors of description ; for most of it was written in the workshop, and all has been revised by my unwearied flint-knapper. Similar assistance has been rendered by stone-diggers in that branch of the work which relates to their craft. So far I have been merely the mouth-piece of the flint-workers, but have verified every part of the description by learning the business practically. That the Brandon gun-flint manufacture is a direct descendant of the neolithic age seems to me certain from a comparison, 1, of old " scrapers " with old strike- a-lights, 2, of old strike-a-lights with modern ones, 3, of strike-a-lights with old English or modern French gun-flints. It is further shown that in one nearly obsolete tool we probably have an iron replica of a neolithic flaking-hammer, and that some of the curious, small, bored celts answer in every point to flaking- hammers and to nothing else.* The observations upon the kind of hammer used, the character of the blows given, and the resultmg nature of the fracture produced are original, and founded upon a close study of the ditferent modes in which flint can be broken. The illustrations are nearly all very faithful copies of particular specimens. Owing to my not bemg able to superintend the drawing, some of the gun-flints are slightly faulty, the trimmed heels being omitted. If it be remembered that all but double-edged flints have a trimmed heel, no error can arise in naming the flints. The English hammer has suffered perfection. It is (as needs must be) a very battered specimen, but the kindly artist has feelingly restored its lost beauties, and unwittingly robbed it of its more important peculiarities. It is well also to remark that the Doubles in this collection are all rather too large, and hence too much like the Singles. This will be remedied if this work attains to a second edition. To Mr. H. W. Bristow, E.U.S., Director of the Geolo- gical Survey of England, my best thanks are due for the verification of many of the references, and much kind assistance in many ways. Sydney B. J. Skertchly. Brandon, Eebruary 28th, 1876. * These observations have now bi^en largely extended, and many new ^^ points (VappxiV have come to light between the ancient and modern arts. This, and the question of the age of Pala!olithic Man, will be treated of in a distinct work. S. B. J. S. December 1877. \ll TABLE OF CONTENTS. Introductory. Page Literature of the subject. — Use of pyrites. — Development of Fire-avms. — Efficiency of gun-flints .._--- 1 Geological Position of the Flints. Lingheath. — Santon Downham. — Broomhill. — Shaker's Lodge. — Elm's Plantation. — Norwich. — Ickhngham. — Elvedon. — Elvedon Lodge. Thetford.— Beer Head. .--... 5 Tools. Stone-digger's picks, &c. — Quartering, Flaking, and Knapping Ham- mers. — Block and Stake. — Flaking candlestick - - - 15 Method of Digging Flint. LocaHties chosen.— Sinking the shafts. — Stages. — Burrows. — Miner's Laws.— Plans of Mines. — Raising the stone. — Prices of FUnt. — Pro- duce ..--.. ---21 Manufacture of Gun-Flints. Drying. — Quartering. — Flaking. — Knapping. — Counting. — Building Flints. — Marked Flints. — Pitted Flints. — Strike-a-Lights. — French gun-flints .--.----27 Antiquity and Development of the Flint Trade at Brandon. Brandon celebrated for its flint from Palaeolithic times.— The Neolithic and Modern mines very similar. — The flaking hammer a i-elic of the Stone Age. — Comparative skill of ancient and modern knappers. — Strike-a- Lights. — Neolithic Flakes ----- 39 Description of Specimens. Flint. — Tools. — Gun-flints. — Flint Locks, &c.— Waste. — Miscellaneous 45 38856. A VIU Age of Paleolithic Man. Page Sketch of the surface geology of Bi-andon. — Position of the implement beds below the Chalky Boulder Clay. — Descriptions of implements. — Subsequent notes - -- - - - -65 On the Connexion between Neolithic Art and the Gun- flint Tkade. Grime's Graves and Lingheath pits, their similarities and differences. — Similar tools used by the neolithic and modern knappers. — ^Similar implements made by the two people. — Comparison between the Neolithic, modern English, and modern French knappers. — The Brandon industry a relic of the Stone Age - - - - G[) IX LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. Fig. Page 1. Hand-gun and Spear - - - - - - 2 2. Section of Flint Pit at Lingheath - _ . faces 6 3. Stone-Digger's Pick - - - - - -15 4. First Quartering Hammer - - - - - Ki 5. Flaking Hammer - - - - - -17 6. English Flaking Hammer - - - - - -18 7. Knapping Hammer - - - - - -19 8. Block and Stake - - - - - - - 19 9. Stake .-.-...- 20 10. Flaking Candlestick - - - - - - 21 11. Plan of Pits for working out Floor Stone - - - faces 2'S 12. „ „ Wall Stone - - - do. 23 13. Flakers at Work ----- Frontispiece 14. Front-view of Core, with Flakes replaced, showing the points of Percussion ------ faces 29 15. Side-view of the above Core - - - - do. 29 16. Double-backed Flake - - - - - - 30 17. Single-backed Flake - - - - - - 30 18. Knappers at Work - - - - - faces 31 19. Flake marked to show how it will be knapped. H.P. = Horse Pistol. C. = Carbine. D. = Double - - - 31 20. English Strike-a-Light - - - - - - 36 21. French Strike-a-Light - - - - - - 36 22. Horse-shoe Strike-a-Light - - - - - - 37 23. Flint Arrow-head from Chatteris. (The engraver has mistaken the character of the chipping and so destroyed the beauty of the figure) - - - - - - - -40 24. Flint Arrow-head from Brandon - - - - - 40 25. Skeleton Flint, showing the various parts - - - - 46 26. Wall Piece 47 27. Large Swan - - - - - - -47 28. Best Musket - - - - - - - 48 29. Second Musket - - - - - - - 49 30. Double-edge Musket - - - - - - 49 31. Common Musket - - - - - - - 50 32. Mixed Grey or Spotted Musket - - - - - 51 33. Solid Grey Musket (Icklingham make) - - - - 51 34. Chalk-heeled Musket - - - - - - 52 35. Best Carbine - - - - - - - 52 36. Second Carbine - - - - - - -53 37. Double-edged Carbine - - - - - - 53 38. Common Carbine - - - - - - -54 39. Common Carbine, Double-edge - - - - - 54 A 2 Fig Page 40. Grey or Spotted Carbine - - - - " ^^ 41 . Chalk-Heeled Carbine - - - - - - ^^ 42. Best Horse-Pistol - - - - - " " ^^ 43. Best Horse-Pistol, Double-edge - - - - - ^6 44. Second Horse-Pistol - - - - " " ^7 45. Second Horse-Pistol, Double-edge - - - - 57 46. Common Horse-Pistol - - - - - " ^^ 47. Common Horse-Pistol, Double-edge - - - - 58 48. Mixed Grey or Spotted Horse-Pistol - ^ - - - 59 49. Chalk-heeled Horse-Pistol - - - - - 59 50. Super Single - - - - - - -u9 61. Second Single - - 60 52. Fine Single - - - - - - "60 53. Super Double - - - - - - "61 54. Second Double or Rifle - - - - - - 61 55. Fine Double - - - - - - - 62 56. Super Pocket-Pistol - - - - - - 62 57. Fine Pocket-Pistol - - - - - - 63 58. Old English Gun-flint - - - - - - 63 59. French Gun-flint - - - - - - - 63 60. Cut and Polished Gun-flint - - - - - 63 61. German Gun-flint - - - - - - - 64 62. Section showing position of Palaeolithic Beds - - - 68 63. Plan of Flint Pit, Grime's Graves - - - - - 70 64. Corresponding portion of a Modern Flint Pit - - - 70 65. Modern FHnt Digger's Pick - - - - - 73 66. Neolithic Flint Digger's Pick - - - - - 7''^ 67- Neolithic Oval Strike-a-Light - - - - - 7^ 68. Modern Oval Strike-a-Light - - - - -7^ 69. Common English Strike-a-Light - - - - - 76 70. Horse-shoe Strike-a-Light - - - - - 77 71. Strike-a-Light - - - - - - -77 ON THE MANUFACTURE OF GUN-FLINTS. Introductory. The manufacture of gun-flints has been earned on for a great leno-th of time at Brandon, a little town on the Ouse Parva, about six miles west of Thetford, in Suifolk. Gun-flints were also made at Icklingham, on the river Lark, in the same county, about 12 miles south of Brandon ; of late years only a single shop and workman have existed at this place, and now (1875) the manu- facture has been stopped for two years. At this place the manu- facture never attained the magnitude or the degree of excellence which gave to Brandon the pre-eminence it now enjoys. Near Norwich gun-flints are still made in small quantities by a single workman, but the Norwich knappers being Brandon men this place may be considered a brancli of the mother trade. Mr. Evans, F.R.S., in his " Ancient Stone Implements of Great Britain,"* gives an accoimt of the manufacture at Brandon, but the fullest record is that of Mr. James Wyatt, F.G.S., of Bedford, in Stevens's " Flint Chips."! From this admirable paper free quotation will be made respecting foreign manufactures. In some few instances the two authors named have fallen into trifling errors, which the possession of their works, and my resi- dence at Brandon, have enabled me to rectify. I have, however, been able to treat the question in far greater detail, and from different aspects than have before been attempted. Like Mr. Wyatt, I have studied the art of gun-flint making under experienced Brandon professors. At first pvrites was as often used as flint, and this must have continued until the manufacture of gim-flints was permanently established. Beckmann, in his "History of Inventions," seems to be of opinion that the use of pyrites preceded that of flint in all cases. This, I think, was nut the case, for in many places flint is much more plentiful than pyrites ; it is better adapted for producing sparks, and was, in fict, in general use as part of the old " flint and steel " apparatus. It is suggestive, on this point, that in the Tower not a single English weapon is preserved in which pyrites was used instead of flint. It must, however, be remembered that in early (neolithic) times pyrites was used with flint for obtaining fil'C. * Pp. 16 to 20. t Pp- 578-90. 2 MANUFACTURE OF GUN-FLINTS, ETC. The date of the final abandonment of pyrites for flint is not known, but in the 3'ear 1586, Julius, Duke of Brunswick, had pyrites collected for his fire-arms near Seefen, and even worked it into shape himself, " though in so doing he often bruised his " fingeis, and was advised by the physicians not to expose him- " self to the sulphurous vapour emitted by that substance." The development of fire-arms is finely illustrated by the col- lection preserved in the Touer of London, from which the following examples are described. At first the tlinis were merely rough pieces of convenient size, and these were used occasionally as late as the year J 630 in France and 173n in England The crudest type of fire-:irm I have seen is in this collection. It is an iron spear, about 3 feet in length, with a barrel at the butt-end, as shown in Fig. 1, which is one-half the size of the original. The barrel is 6 inches long, with a bore of about ^ of an inch in diameter. Ilie touch-hole and pan are shown at d. Attached to a link are two short wire chains, to one of which a stout steel pin is appended and to the other a clip to hold the fiint. The weapon Fig. 1. Hand-gun and spear. In the Tower Armoury. a. b. Length of barrel. c. Portion of the spear. d. Touch hole and pan. e. Steel pin. /. CUp for flint. was placed under the arm, the flint was then held over the pan and struck with the steel pin. It is dated 16th century, and numljered ^4, At Dresden an old gun is still preserved, called a Buchse " on '•' which, instead of a lock, there is a cock with a flint-stone *•' placed opposite to the touch-hole, and this flint was rubbed *' -vN-ith a file till it emitted a spark.'"* The first improvements on the original hand-fired match-lock was a cock to hold the match. The cock fell towards the gunner and a sliding cover was afterwards appended to the pan to protect the priming, and prevent sparks striking the gunner's face. The earliest weapon in the Tower in which the motion is from the gunner is a Flemish wall-piece of the middle of the 17th century. * History of Inventions, Discoveries, and Origins, by John Beckmann, London. Bohn. 4th edition, pp. .533 to 539. IIISTOllY OF FIRE-AlUrs. 3 It is lubelle!] -^1. A German Avhcd-lock haiqiicbiis, dated 1738, however, still has the cock falUng towards the gunner. In the 15th century the wheel-lock was introduced with the use of flints or pyrites. The stone was screwed into a cock, and a steel plate or wheel, which was cocked or wound np hy a parti- cular kind of key called a spanner, was fixed to the barrel. At fir^t these weapons missed fire very often, and a German harquebus, dated 1546, and marked ^, was originally a wheel- lock but converted info a matchlock. Afterwards a match-lock Wiis used with the wlu^el-lock so as to be ready in case of the latter missing fire. The harquebus with this double arrangement dated 1G03, is exhibited at the Tower, the catalogue mark being fVt* Wheel locks were used in Germany as late as the year 1797, for a rifle so dated is shown with the catalogue number ^|. The date of the introduction of the true flint-lock is uncertain. The earliest notice known to Mr. J. Hewitt, the author of the " Oflficial Catalogue of the Tower Armouries," is that printed in the Itt vol. of the proceedings of the Norfolk Archajological Society, the record of a payment by the Chamberlain of Norwich in 1588, ' to Henry Rador, smyth, for making ime of the old pistols with a snapphance and a new stock for it,' (p. 16.) "The German name of Schnapphahn," says Mr. Hewitt, " borne by the flint arm in its earliest days, clearly shows that the invention was a German one."* The superiority of t!ie flint over the match- lock is shown by the fact that soon after its introduction the old locks were converted into the new form, specimens of which are to be seen in the Tower, as for instance one marked -^j, of the reign of William III. Flint-locks were introduced into the English army about the year 1686, and were in general use at the beginning of the I8th century. The soldiers of the duchy of Brunswick used match-locks until the year 1687, " In France, the Miquelet gun-lock, a Spanish in- '* vention, was first introduced in 1630, but the stone, if flint was " used at that time, had not, at all events, been subjected to any " manufacturing process."! By the year 1703 the soldier was armed with a musket, but he had to find his own flints which were often used in a rough state. It was not until the year 1719 that a manufacture of gun-flints was regidarly established in France. Gun-flints were superseded in England by percussion caps about the year 1835, and so complete was the change that flint- locks ceased to be manufactured for home use soon afterwards, with the exception of those used for horse-pistols, which are still very frequently of the old pattern, and which may be purchased at most ironmongers in large towns. The old flint-lock, long-barrelled, duck-guns used by gunners are by some still preferred to modern guns, for it is said, and it seems to me very likely, that the flash in the pan causes the ducks to raise their heads from the water, * Official Cat. Tower Arinourics, p. 74 (foot uote) 1870. t Quoted hv Wj alt. Flint (Viivx, \k hi 'i. MANUFACTUKE OF GUN-FLINTS, ETC. and so increases the chance of hitting them. The flash is certainly sufficiently in advance of the discharge to be noticed, and wary birds like ducks are very likely to be ronsed by it. A good flint will last a gunner half a day, but as there is con- siderable uncertainty as to amount of work got out of it in that time, I fired a flint-lock pistol with a new flint 100 times in succession.* The folio wins; results were obtained : — The phtoljired „ „ flashed missed fire >> 36 times. 25 39 35 33 100 I did not find much difference between the beginning and end of the experiment ; indeed the misses were more frequent at first than afterwards. Thus dividing- tlie 100 shots into four batches of 25, in the order of discharge, there were : — Fires riaslies Misses Totals 11 1 13 25 10 7 8 25 25 4. 6 8 11 25 When a flint gets much worn, however, it mioses fire very often, a serious matter in warfare. " All military men," says a writer in Kees's Cyclopaedia, " must know that nothing is more adverse to " the operations of a regiment than the necessity (whicli too often " occurs in consequence of the proper form of gun-flints not being " sufficiently attended to) for men to quit their ranks for the *' purpose of either hammering or changing their flints. To brave " men such a necessity is painful as well as dangerous, while to " the less resolute it serves at least for a pretext to pass into the " rear, or eventually to relinquish his post altogether."t The gun-flint trade is steadily dying out, and unless some alteration takes place a lew more years will terminate its existence. Its decay is not owing, as might have been supposed, to a fidling oft" in the demand ; but to a lack of hands, the boys T)referring agricultural or other labour to the confinement of a knapper's shop. The demand for flints, especially from Birming- ham and Sheffield merchants, is even now in excess of the supply. * The flint used was rather too hroad. A better fitting one fired 34 times, flashed 7 times and missed 09 times. In the first 25 it fired 20 times, flashed 1 and missed 4 times ; in the last 25 there were 2 fires and 23 misses — showing that the flint was worn np. It may be taken as near the truth that a flint cannot he depended upon for more than 30 shots. f Quoted by Wyatt. DECAY OF THE FLINT TRADE. 5 and to my knowledge large orders for hundreds of thousaiuls of gun-flints have i)een recently declined in consequence of the paucity of hands. It is very difficult to obtain statistics to prove this ; but old men say the number of knapi)ers has steadily decreased. In the year 1868 there were 36 men regularly at work, exclusive of the stone diggers ; these men worked for three masters who were buyers in Brandon and dealt with the mer- chants. Of late years the flint-makers have preferred to get rid of the buyers, and to sell directly to the merchants. There are at present (April 1878) 26 men and boys, who work in four shops, shoAving a decrease of 10 knappers in ten years. Several knappers work at other things during the day and knap at night, but many of these are giving up flmt-niaking. P'ive men and five boys are engaged in stone-digging. The gun-flint manufacture used to be considered a very unhealthy one, and it was said that every knapper died of con- sumption at about 40 years of age. This may have been true, but the consumption was of drink, and not of the lungs ; it being the practice to work from Wednesday to Saturday and drink the rest of the time. This unhappy state of affairs is coming to an end, and some of the steadiest men in Brandon are knappers, and several are quite old. The practice of damp- ing the flint before using it also renders the trade less un- heiilthy ; but the particles of dust flying about certainly have some influence upon health. Geological Position of the Flints. The flint now manufactured at Brandon is obtained from Lingheath, about a mile south-south-east of the town, but it has, until of late years, been dug at Santon Downham, three miles further up the river, and at Broomhill about a mile from the town on the Norfolk side of the river. The flints occur, of course, in the Upper Chalk, and the sections at the three points will now be described. Lingheath.— Lingheath is completely honey-combed with new and old pits, from Brandon Park on the Avest to the slope of the Ouse Valley on the east. The pits in the latter situation are now worked out ; they were shallower than those high up on the heath, a necessary consequence of their position. They are known a.s the Fleet Pits from this circumstance, fleet being a local term signi- fying near the surface, as distinct from gain meaning near at hand in aTiorizontal direction ; fleet refers to vertical, gain to horizontal distances. These admirable terms express two distinct ideas for which our cultured language has only the one word near. ^ The flint has been worked on Lingheath for about 160 years, prior to which time, the stone was obtained from Brandon Park near the Elms. . Fig. 2 is a section of a typical flint-pit measured by myselt on the sliramit of Lingheath, in the Poor's Plantation, to which is 6 MANUFACTURE OF GUN-FLINTS, ETC. added from the information of old diggers all the beds below the Floor-stone. The section thus compounded is as follows : — 1. Sand and Gravel 2. Dead-Lime - - - 3. Soft, White Chalk 4. Horns Flint, thickness included in 5. Soft, White Chalk - 6. Toppinqs Flint 7. Soft, White Chalk H. First Pipe- Clay 9. Hard, White Chalk - 10. Upper- Crust Flint 11. Soft, White Chalk 1 2. Second Pipe- Clay 13. Hard Chalk, one jointless bed 14. Soft, White Chalk - 15. Wall Stone - 1 6. Very Soft Chalk, full of Horns 17. Soft, White Chalk - 18. Third Pipe- Clay 19. Ha?-d, White Chalk - 20. Floor Stone - - - 21. Soft, White Chalk - 22. Hard, White Chalk - 23. Rough and Smooth Blacks 24. Soft, White Chalk The sand and gravel is part of the very wide-spread deposit, containino' palgeolithic implements, which covers almost the whole face of the country, reaching the highest ground in the county and plunging into the valleys quite irrespective of the present drainage system. Mr. Evans, F.R.S.,^ and INIr. Flower, F.Gr.S.,t have described portions of this deposit as isoLited patciies capping high ground. The latter indeed says "it comprises an area of from thirty to forty acres," had he written miles he would have been within the truth ; neither of these authors seem to have a know- ledge of the extent of these beds, which will be described in the ' explanation of sheet 51 N.E. of the Geological Survey. The term dead-lime is a local designation for decomposed chalk, into which the sand penetrates, and with which its upper part is o-enerally mixed. It is quite friable above but lumpy below; small Hints, With natural coats, are scattered through it. In " fleet pits," where it intersects a layer of flints (as ^^^ll be presently described), the large flints are always " edge-ways," or stand on end, and often have brown glazed coats. The junction with the chalk below^ is more or less abrupt. ft- in. 3 5 4 3 6 5 4 4 1 8 1 2 1 2 1 2 6 2 6 2 3 8 7 6 1 6 4 46 1 * Ancient Stone Implements of Great Britain, 1872, pp. 507, 511, &c. t Q. J. Geol. Soc, vol. xxv., t8()U, pp. 449-50. To face paijc <> ;'.V''.^'' •.y?i&- to do moi*e than bruise the stone : and a maximum, which if exceeded shatters without flaking the flint. With heavy hammers lono-er flakes can be struck than with lio;ht ones. J8 MANUFACTURE OF GUN-FLINTS, ETC. English. Hammer. — Prior to the Introduction of the French hammer the Brandon people used an oval hammer similar to that shown in Fig. 6, which is included ia the new set in the collection. Fi;.'-. 6. — English Flaking Hammer. A hammer called the English hammer is still in use of wliich the one figured is a specimen, but it is merely a flaking bamuier of the French pattern very much worn. The one in question lias been in constant nse for over GO years. English hammers are Dcver made specially. The probability of the old English flaker being a mctailic reminiscence of the stone age is discussed in the sequel. Knapping Hammers nre made from 9-inch flat-files drawn out as shown in Fig. 7. They require deiicsitely tempering, or they will fly instantly. Mr. Wyatt states that the heads are set on obliquely. If he refer to the setting of the heads on the handles he has fallen into an error, but if to the set of the hammer on the flint he is correct. The edges at first are quite square, but they soon wear and require filing up daily. They generally become hollowed out in the centre, as is the case with the old one in the collection; much, however, depends upon the individual pecu- liarity of the knapper, each of whom can tell his own by the manner in which it wears. If the edge is not kept square it is apt to CTap or split the Hints. The old one in the collection has been drawn out, and is very much worn ; so much, indeed, as to be fit only for a learner. A quick knapper wears out a hannner in a fbrtni^rht. The one in question was originally of the same length BLOCK AND STAKE. 19 as the new one, and has been twice worn down and once drawn out. It has been in use for a niontli. Fig. -Knapping Hammer. The Blocks are made of the boles of larije ehii trees, and measure about 4 feet in diameter and 2 feet in height. A small model block with the stake, &:c. full sized is in the collection, and is represented in Fig. 8. The blocks are placed by preference Fig. 8. — Block and Stake. against the wall as shown in Figs. 13 and 18, and slope gently forwards. At a distance of about 4 inches from the side the stake is placed. The stake is a piece of iron about 6 inches in length and 1 inch square at the shoulder, tajiering to a point below. Fig. 9 represents a stake in which a is the neck upon which the flint is made, h the 20 MANUFACTURE OF GUN-FLINTS, ETC. shoulder, c the body. To set the stake a round hole is bored 6 Indies in depth, and of less diameter than the width of the stake. The a. Nuck. Fig. 9.— .Stake, b. Shoulder. Body. stake is then made red hot and driven so that the shoulder is from a quarter tu three-f|uarters of an inch above the block. It is then ^vithdra\vn, and four pieces of leatiier, called stake-leatlier, :ire cut 1 inch wide, 3 inches long, and tapering to a point. The points of these are then inserted into the hole, the stake re-placed and driven home. It must not, however, reach the bottom of the hole or the flakes would strike " dead " on it, and would not work. Some knappers insert a wedge-shaped piece of oak, about 6 inches by 3, in front of the stake to fix the stage to ; this saves the block, which would otherwise be injured by the nails driven into it to secure the stage; the wedge can, of course, be replaced. The stage consists of two parts, the staginrj-wood and the hiuq^iping-leather. The former is a semi-cylindrical piece of ash about 3 inches by three-quarters, and is nailed on to the block close to the stake so that its length is at right angles to tlie face of the stake. Over the staging-wood the knapping leather is fixed. It con- sists of a piece of sole-leather about 4 inches by 1, fixed trans- versely across the wood, by from two to four wringijigs, which are the points of horse-shoe nails wrung off by the blacksmiths. These are always used, because they are rough, have no heads, drive well, and hold tightly, and when the leather is worn up they draw out cleanly, and can be used over ngniu. The width of the leather is such that the knapping hammer falls clear of the nails. The leather now used is new, and the in?ide is jilaced upper- most, because it is rougher and free from grease. Until lately old leather was used. The whole of the stage must be very firmly fixed. The height of the stake varies with the kind of gun-flints to be made upon it, this height being called the fa/I. For ordinary flints the fall is about If inch; for muskets, 2 inches; but some knappers like a greater fall than others. STONE-DIGGERS LAWS. 21 In working the fore corner (tliat is the corner furthest from the knapper, the other being the liind corner) wears down, as shown in the niotlcl bU)ck, and the hind corner i equircs raspino- down at least once a day to keep it leveh The other implements are the knapper's knee-piece described in the account of flaking, and i\\Qji(ikiuo 1 6 including Second Muskets . - - - 550 — Common black Muskets . . - .000 — Grey do - 150 — Second Carbines - _ - - 4,100 — Common do - 1,900 — Horse Pistols - - - - - 2,000 — Singles _ - _ - - 400 — Large Guns . - - - - 750 — Small do. - 500 — Faced Builders - - - - - 60 6 13 Rough do. - - - - - 210 3 3 4 Chips ------ 6 7 12 ' 13 1 Ihe laro-er waste,* consisting of outside and bad flakes, irregular pieces, &c. is used for road-metal, and fetches %d.. a jag. The finer chips from the gun- flints are used for garden paths, &c., and until lately were given away, but now fetch 4^. per jag.j * The waste amounted to 53 per cent, of the whole, and the gun-flints only to 13 per cent. f Immense heaps of waste are still to be seen m Brandon, althoHgh thousands of tons have been used on the Great Eastern Railway, and every available pit is filled up with it. Some years since hundreds of tons were carted on to Lingheath ; the presence of masses of chips does not necessarily show that gun-flints have been manufactured on the spot. DRYING AXD QUARTERING. 27 The flint is very variable in quality and in constancy of colour. Some is quite black in situ, but changes to a milky tint in the course of an hour, while other stones never lose their black colour even when exposed to the weather. Of these some of the best examples are to be seen in the north wall of Lode Cottage, whicli I occupied at Brandon, and which are as black as when dug 20 years ago. These were obtained from very deep pits in the Poors Plantation, in which the flint was larger, blacker, and better in uianv respects than has been since obtained. There is little doubt that if this house were pulled down, the flints in question would be worked up into gun-flints. This stone had good runnmg qualities, and flakes 8 inches long were not un- commonly obtained from it. A few outside flakes from it are shown in the collection. Manufacture. In the process of manufacture there are four processes — dryinc/, quartering, flaking, and hnapping. Drying. — The stone is brought from the pits and shot down outside the shops where in the summer it dries ver\' rapidly, but in the winter remains wet. In the summer the stone is brought inside the shops and often worked at once, but it is now becoming the practice to sprinkle water over the blocks ; the reason assigned beino- that it " lays the dust." The quarry-water, however, is alwavs got rid of, and hence in winter the stone is stacked round the flie-place to dry. Water is not sprinkled on the stone in winter, the flint being so hygroscopic that it is always damp out- side. Even the dry flakes will turn damp when the atmosphere is moist, and then they are sometimes dried over again. Quartering. — A block of stone is then taken and quartered. The workman sits on a stool placed in front of a window or door, and is very careful about setting it slightly sloping forward so as to incline the body, and obviate the necessity for bending, which would lead to back-ache. Some workmen are very particular about their stools, and Avill spend half-an-hour in the adjustment ; and in summer, when the stoil is placed opposite the door, will rather jump over it than shift it. The workman wears a large leather apron, and on his left knee a knee-piece made of pieces of old boot-tops about 6 inches by 12, on the top of which is a cross-piece, made by preference from a stout boot-sole, or failing that from a piece of old harness. The cross-piece is about 6 inches by -3 inches, with a hole at each end by which the entire knee-piece is bound lightly across the knee with a leather thong called a knee-piece string. The blocks of stone are taken just as they are delivered, and varv in w^eight from about a quarter of a hundredweighi to nearly two hundredweights. One is placed against the knee so as to 28 MAXUFACTURE OF GUX-FLTKTS, ETC. bring a flat or hollow part upon the knee-piece for the hammer to strike upon. It is then slightly tapped with the quartering hnmmer, the large or small one beino- used accordino; to the size of the stone. The tap tells the Avorkmen whether the stone is sormd or not. If it is full of cracks it flies to pieces with a jarring sound. If the coat is hard and the hammer rings, the stone is sound. If the hammer falls dull and jumps, the stone is sure to be double-coated, and grey or mixed colour beneath the coat. Sometimes pieces fall out on tapping the stone which have a sub- conical inner surftice ; thet^e are known as ])ot-lids. The stone is then quartered or broken into pieces of a convenient size to work. The blow is given from the elbow, the hammer being raised about a foot and allowed to fall, little or no power being put into the blow. Tiie stone is nearly always struck from the natural upper surface, because the bottom coat is softer, and the hammer does not bite. If, however, as occasionally happens, the bottom coat is the harder, it is quartered h'ova below."^ The stone has to be broken so as to leave a more or less square edge to begin flaking from. The quartered pieces average about six inches square, but there is no regulnrity in the size. Flaking. — The next process is flaking, which is performed on the same stool as was the previous j)rocess, the workman quartering a stone and then flaking it up. This is the most dlfticiilt br;inch of the business, and requires great skill and nicety of judgment. The stone must be struck at tlie proper antiic, in the exact spot, with a certain force, and by a given portion of the face: and all but the first of these elements vary with every flake. jNLany knappers are unable to flake, and but few iittain great proficiency in the art. The quarter is graspeil in the hand and the face brought ngainst the knee-piece at an angle of about 45°. The lilow is then given by raising the flaking hammer (large or small according to the size of the stone) from the elbow al)0ut 2 inches, and allowing it to fall by its own weigiit, or with a slight extra force according to the size of the quarter. The stone is struck squarely, but not with the whole f ice of the hammer. If the flake is to be thin, the blow falls just inside the face ; if thicker, a little further in, but a flake could not be struck to any purpose if the whole face fell on the stone, and this is the limit of thickness for flakes produced by any hammer. The outside flakes, called '•' sliives," which show the coat, are thrown aside as waste, and bv removing these the block is made to assume a rough, many- sided, polygonal form. The next series of flakes are so struck as to fall a little to one side of the previous blows, and the flake runs so as to include the angles or ribs of two of the first fl.ikes, and it is thus double backed. The edge of this flake leaves another rib. * The best stone has a thin hard upper coat and a thick soft bottom coat. The coat may be quite white or brownish below and is sometimes bhiish, but these latter are not good and are generally " shotten bottoms " or pitted as if by shot. The tops of good stone are often bluish. To face, page 29. Fig. 14. — Front View of Core, with Flakes replaced, shoiving the Points of Percussion, j Fig. 15. — Side Viezo of Flint Core {Fig. 14). FLAKING. 29 The next flake is struck a little to one side of the similar one in the previous series, nud so on. In this way the flaker works round the qunrter and removes from two to three rows of flakes, according to tlie (lualilyof the stone. Figs. 14 and 1 5 show a core with the flakes, 38 in number, replaced, and the points of percussion are plainly traceable and show how each blow was struck. Simple as this process appears, it is, nevertheless, very difficidt; for great precision of judgment is required, not only to determine the nature of the blow, but so to flake that the greatest number of useful flakes can be obtained from a single qunrter. The stone varies in quality, some running well and clean, others breaking off" short and "stubbly;" and unless the flakes are struck of different sizes much waste would ensue. It is this judgment which distinoruishes a good from an inferior flaker ; a good one would work to profit stone upon which an inferior man would lose money. The cores resulting from the flaking are squared or rounded up, and used as building flints. The workman sits with five small tubs around him, two on his left, and three on his right. Into the hindermost left-hand tub, called the chip-tub, the waste irregular fragments are dropped, this tub being close at hand under the quarter so that the waste will fall into it ; the larger pieces are thrown into the other tub, called the builder-tub, which is at arm's length from the flaker. The three tubs on the right are placed in a triangle close together; the left-hand one, called the best-tub, receives the good double- backed flakes, the middle one, called the common-tub, the single- backed flakes (of which many must be struck), and the right-hand one, called the little- un -tub, the small flakes which are given to apprentice boys to practice upon. {!See Fig. 13. Frontispiece.) Considerable skill is also required to reduce the amount of work to a minimum ; the hammer is made to fall on the near side of the knee-piece ; it is then dropped on to the leg, while the flake is thrown into the tub, and lies with its face over the spot on which it is first tapped, so that it is ready for the next blow ; in this way much time is saved. The flattened side of the flakino-- hammer is used to dress off' irregular pieces. The flaker works according to his needs. If he has to supply a quantity of flints of one size he makes his flakes accordino-ly. Tiius he will flake for muskets, carbines, horse-pistols, or even singles.* As a rule, however, several kinds of flints are required together, in which case he makes large and small flakes. Sinorje- backed flakes are never struck intentionally. The first two flakes must necessarily have only one back ; but if the stone be good no others are made from a quarter. A flake to be perfect should have the face flat, the edges even, and the ribs parallel all the way down, but this can only be obtained from very good stone. As a rule the ribs are not parallel, nor the edges quite straight, and many stones will not run with a level face, but are twisted or * It would be impossible, however, to strike all the flakes of a given size withrait wasting a fjreat deal of stoue. 38836. (J ,sHS--' 30 MANUFACTURE OF GUN-FLINTS. ETC. curved, when they are snid to be zvrutiq. When a il ike does not run, but breaks short or turns at the end it is said to didf* ''•■\i^ Fif. 16. — Doiible-backed Flake, Fig. 1 7. — tiiagle-hacked Flake, natural size. natural size. These two flakes have lun right through the core, and are hence square ended. "When the quarter is worked uj) an edge is left ; the stone is tlien turned over, and a flake struck off with the English hammer. Such flakes are called English flakes and have no ribs, and are used lor making commper has a certain peculiar style which enables him to distinguish his own flints. He tells them at once by feeling them with his left hand, and though the difierences are very slight I have always found a knapper correct, though he cannot say more than that a gun-flint is or is not his own workmanship. This judg- ment is irrespective of sight and can be equally well used in the dark. I tested Southwell blind-folded with about 30 flints made by himself, myself, and three other knappers, and put with them three which I had made but he had finished up for me. He was right in every case. When he came to one which was a joint pro- duction he hesitated, and said '* I seem to have handled this, but there are points about it that don't seem to be my work." This struck me as being very extraordinary. The flints were given to him one by one, and he did not see any of them, nor was he told whether his statements were correct until he had finished. It will be noticed in carefully examining flints that one side is nearly always less well made than the other. This is because flint does not cut so well after it has been handled. An average workman will knap 3,000 flints in a day of 12 hours, but a good one will make 4,000 at a pinch. One man for instance, working from 4 a.m., till 11 p.m. made 24,000 in a week. Southwell and a boy, with the aid of an extra man and a boy at night, made 44,800 in a week, flaking included. Fig. 18 shows Mr. Southwell in the act of knapping and well illustrates the position, &c. The flints when made are thrown into tins ranged round the block as shown in the plate. Com- mencing on the left of the knapper the tins are so placed that best and most used flints are placed in the tin opposite to him. Mr. Southwell's arrangement is 1 Second Single, 2 Second Carbine, 3 Second Horse-pistol, 4 Second Musket, 5 Common Carbine, 6 Common Musket, 7 Common Horse-pistol, 8 Common Sinjile, 9 Grey Musket. Wlien the tins are full the flints are counted. This is done in fives called casts — an average tin holding about 100 casts. The flints are thrown on to a board or table, at which the counter sits and draws the flints into his apron, three with the right hand two with the left hand. The process is very rapid. Southwell counted in my {)reser;ce 700 in 1 minute 35 seconds, or at the rate of about 1,000 in two minutes. He considers this about his averao-e speed and has counted 50,000 at the same rate, including the time spent in picking up, emptying, and replacing the tubs or cans.* The quickest coimtei' in Brandou cau count 6U0 a minute. s. d. 3 6 2 9 2 6 2 3 4 2 9 1 8 2 6 1 6 34 MANUFACTURE OF GUN-FLlNTS, ETC. At one time a leather collar or disc was placed on the knappuig hammer close to the head to prevent chips hitting the hand, but this is never done at present except by old men. The prices paid to jom-neymen are, per thousand, for flaking, a shilling; for knapping, 14 pence, but in slack times the price has fallen to seven pence. The prices of the gun-flints per thousand at present in the town are • Second Muskets - - - • Common Muskets - - - ■ Spotted Mut^kets - - - . Solid Grey Muskets Second Carbine - _ - . Second Horse-pistol Common Horse-pistol Second Single . - - Second Double - _ - . The gun-flints are packed into tubs or sacks containing from 5,000 to 20,000 each, and are consigned to merchants in Liver- pool, Manchester, Birmingham, Bristol, and London, by whom they are shipped for foreign markets, very few being used in England, these being chiefly used for horse-pistols. The old ^•unners or duck-shooters about Brandon still use flint-guns. Building Flints. The cores from which flakes have been struck are slightly worked up to form building-stones, or builders, as they are more commonly called. From their mode of formation they taper towards the end ; but they are worked to a level ffice if possible, but if any projection exists on the face it is struck off and is then called a " chip-back," because it has been chipped back to a level face. These, however, are not considered so good as those which have a smooth face struck by a single blow of the quartering hammer. Builders are known under the following designations : — L Square Black-faced Builders. 2. „ Mixed coloured „ 3. Round Black „ 4. ,, Mixed coloured „ 5. Rando7i faced „ 6. Rougli Builders. 7. Land Stones. The first four are made to size as ordered, but this size is arbitrary ; the fifth are called randoms, because they are of any size and not assorted. The two last are not cores. No. 6 are the irregular pieces broken from the quarter, and No. 7 are merely stones picked from the surface of the ground, and built into walls without any dressing. These flints make a very durable and nice-looking wall. ]Many of the houses in this district arc built of them ; and, when BUILDING FLINTS. 35 the quoiiiing is of brick, tlie appearance is quite attractive, and possesses none of the heavy look that might be expected. Faced flints have been used for buihUng purposes for a long period, and some of the Norwich churches show them very cleverly worked to fit into freestone tracery of the Decorated style. The trade in builders is steadily increasing, and their durability and effective- ness, combined with small cost, bid fair to give them a more extensive sale than has hitherto boon their lot. 'J'he prices in the town at present are: — s. d. For Square Black-faced Builders - 4 per 100 „ Mixed Coloured ditto • - 4 „ „ Round ditto - - -40, „ Mixed coloured ditto - _ 4 Q „ „ Randon faced - - 3 „ „ Rough Builders - 35. 6rf. to 5 per ton. Land stones only bear tlie expense of cartage. In Suffolk, mixed coloured builders are preferred to black ones. Specimens of each of these are shown in the collection ; and, on the square black-faced builder, Southwell has marked his initials and the date of the formation of the collection. This is done by means of sharp re-bounding blows with a punch, and the shape of the indentations shows that each blow drove out a little bulb.* This is an old method of perpetuating the name of the maker of builders. For instance, on Icklingham All Saints Church there are seen — J. B. (= James Benstead) 1806. H. A. (= Henry Ashley) 1865. On walls built of flints small circular pittings, seldom more than a quarter of an inch in diameter, are often seen. They have been attributed to the action of frost upon the stone, but I feel sure that no exposure to mere weather would ever cut out such depressions, but that they are produced by slight blows. Each will be seen to possess a tiny bulb of percussion, and the pittings are always most plentiful within a few feet of the ground, or in just the position in which the stone is most likely to be accidentally struck. Higher up, out of reach of ordinary mishaps, they are much less frequent, although they are more exposed to the weather. It is true that some stones hio-h up in a building show ])ittings, but building-stones are not carefully preserved from injury, and some of the specimens in the Museum of Practical Geology are smothered with depressions, and these have clearly been tapped on the face by the builder to briuf* them into line with the others. On a smooth surface the weather could not possibly produce the ])ittings ; a crack mitrht be enlarged by the expansion of frozen rain-water, but no buib * Gentler blows, which do not detach the pieces, produce incipient bulbs which give to the flint the peculiar appearance known as " snake pattern " in agates. This pattern is produced in the same way. A specimen ot flint so marked by me is in the collection. 36 MANL'fACTUKE OF GUN-FLINTS. ETC. of percussion could in any way be the result. I have found by experiment that the slightest blow, if of a reboundino: character, will produce incipient bulbs, even pebbles the size of a pea pro- jected with moderate force are sufficient for this purpose, and water tiuvling its way into the little fissure so produced would on freezino- enlarije the fracture, but its direction and extent icould be determined by the momentum and area of striking surface of the original bloic : hence the piece will assume a conchoidal form sucii as is invariablv found to be the case. I have long and carefully studied the fracture oi' tlint. and feel certain that bulbs of percussion can only be formed bv blows. Around Brandon it is very common to find fiints naturally frac- tured, with one suiiace studded all over with pittings similar to those in Cjuestion, and they are most frequent in the vicinity of old tlint workshops. A specmien of these is shown in the col- lection, and it will not be surprising if they turn out to be stones used in detachiuor the small flakes from the surfaces of arrow- heads, &c. Miscellaneous. Strike-a-lights are shown of four shapes Fig. 20 represents Fig. 20. — English Strike- a- Light. the usual form of the old English kind, which is Identical with the present French strike-a-light and the modern French and old Fig. 21. — French Sfrike-a- Light. Si-e al?o i'ig. 59. FnsHsh gun-flint ; and, as will be hereafter shown, very like some of the ancient so-called "scrapers." Figs. 21 and 22 represent particular shapes Avhich are sometimes ordered to this dav and are again similar to some old " scrapers." These strike-a lights are STRIKE-A-LIGllTS. 37 made from English flakes, and the first gun-flints only clifFered from them in being of smaller size ; the old gun-flints were, in Fio-. 22. — Horse-shoe Strike-a- Light. foot, only modifications of the existing strike-a-lights. I venture to name Fig. 20 the English strike-a4ight, Fig. 21 the French strike -a-light, and Fig. 22 the Horse-shoe strike-a-light, for obvious reasons, and because it is as well to have names for these peculiar relics of the stone age. I have a German gun-flint which is also identical in shape with some of the so-called " scrapers." Specimens of discoidal flints are shown of which many thousands were made some years ago for a London merchant, but their use is unknown. They are supposed to have been used for some orna- mental inlaid work, or for pivots on which axles were to work. The waste chips are used for road-making, and were formerly o-iven away, but are now sold at 3d per one-horse load. There are thousands of tons still lying aromid the knappers' shops. Attempts have been made to introduce these chips into the pottery districts for calcining and using in the manufacture of china, but they were not very successful as so many of them were outside chips retaining the coat, which w-as not serviceable. I believe another attempt is about to be made to re-introduce them. At present large quantities of brown weathered flints are im- ported from Havre for this purpose, and it is thought that the native material can be sorted and utilised at less expense. Notes ox French Gun-flints. The French knappers (caillouteurs) make use of the following tools : — " 1. A hammer or mace of iron, with a square head, the weight of which did not exceed two pounds (but it may be of iialf that weight only), with a handle seven or eight inches long. This tool is not made of steel, for an excess of hardness would render the strokes too hard or dry (as the phrase is) and would shatter the nodules irregularly, instead of breaking thein by a clean fracture," This implement answers to the present " quartering hammer." It was, however, smaller than that tool, and leads me to conclude the flints were brought to the knapper in smaller pieces than to their Eni;lish brethren. 38 MANUFACTURE OF GUN-FLINTS, ETC. 2. A hammer with two points. This is made of good steel, well hardened ; its weight does not exceed 1 6 omices. Its handle is seven inches long, passing through it in such a manner that the points of the hammer are nearer the hand of the workman than the centre of gravity of the mas?." The present " flaking-hammer " resembles this tool. The points of the flaking hammer, however, are not inclined, and the tool is lighter than the English one 3. The disc-hammer, or roller, a small tool, called in French roulette, which represents a solid wheel, or segment of a cylinder, two inches and four lines in diameter : its weight does not exceed 12 ounces. It is made of steel not hardened, and is fixed on a handle six inches in length, which passes through a square hole in the centre. 4. A chisel, tapering and bevilled at both extremities, seven or eio-ht inches long, and two inches wide, made of steel not hardened. This is set on a block of wood, which, at the same time, serves as a bench for the workmen. This chisel answers to the "stake" in present use."^ The only place in which gun-flints are now made in France on a scale of some magnitude is the village of Meunes.t (I have since learned that so late as 1870 gun-flints were made at Romantin (Loire et Cher), Lye (Indre), and St. Aignan (Loire et Cher). "Whether the manufacture still continues I do not know. I have samples of this work, and they are identical with the French gun-flint figured below.) The stone for manufacturing the gun-flints for the French army was selected with great care. It Avas obtained from Meunes, Coufi'v, Pouille, Ange, Chatillon, Noyers, Langon, Lyes, Paulmey, Lucion, and Valencay. At the first-mentioned place a special artillery officer Avas stationed to examine the gun-flints. INIoyesse and St. Vincent (Ardeche), Cerilly (Yonne) and La Roche Guyon on the banks of the Seine (Oise), are also mentioned as furnishing good beds of flint.t The flint-pits on the banks of the Cher were from 40 to 50 feet in depth, from whence levels or horizontal galleries Avere driven " into the only good stratum which is known in that dis- trict," but whether above or below the flint is not stated. § *' In p:>rts of France three or four Avorkmen used to join for the purpose of excaA'ating flint for the gun-flint makers. Thev Avould first dig a trench, about six feet in length and depth, and about two feet in breadth ; then they aa'ouM make a second trench lower than the first, and so on, like the parallels of siege- Avorks, till thev o^ot to the depth of from 30 to 40 feet, Avhere the flint nodules Avere found embedded in a soft kind of chalk."|| The specimens in the collections show that the French gun- flints are nothing but small strike-a-lights. * Rees, article Gun-Flint, op. cit. + Steenstnip and Lubbock. Flint Implements of Pressigny, Trans. Eth. Soc, N. S. Lond., vol v.. pp. 22 1-227 . t Arch. Dep. Cent, de' rArtiUone. § Rees, article Gun-Flint, op. cit. II Wjatt, Flint Chips, p. 582. FLINT-KNArPERS AND XEOLITlIS. 39 Antiquity and Development of the Flint Trade at Brandon. From paltiiolithic times to the present day the vicinity of Brandon has been one of the great omporia for flint, and the huge neolithic pits at Grime's Graves attest by their size and number how important the manufacture was in those times. AVhen we remember how largely flint was worked, even after the intro- duction cf metal, it is highly improbable that its fire-producing value should not early be discovered, and this would give a fresh impetus to the flint-trade, and strike-a-lights would become mer- chantable commodities, and we know they were made here before the introduction of gun-flints.* From this trade the manufacture of o-un-flints is a lineal descendant, and it exists at the present day. The forms of strike-a-lights have not varied since neolithic times ; the first gun-flints were nothing but small strike-a-li^hts, and the modern French and German gun-flints are still of this character. This seems to be the true genealogy of the gun-flint, and show the intermediate steps between the old strike-a-light and the modern English gun-flint are very clear. There is, I believe, no evidence of j)ala?olitIiic man mining for flint, but the neolithic people (separated in time from the old Stone folk by an interval perhaps equalling, if it did not exceed, that which parts us from them) certainly mined largely, and I cannot but think that the manufacture of flint implements for various purposes has gone on without any, or but slight, inter- ruptions from the earliest times to this moment. It becomes a nice question to determine how far the process has improved or degenerated and though from the nature of the inquiry but little can be determined, that little is of great interest. So far as mining is concerned the record is one of steady but slow progress. The diggers of the old flint-pits at Grime's Graves sunk funnel-shaped shafts to a depth of 30 feet, with a diameter of 25 feet at the top, and this Herculean task was accomplished by the aid of no better tools than unbored stone celts and picks made from the antlers of the red deer. The sides had no stao-ino-s, and the material was in all probability hauled up in wicker or skin baskets by sinew or fibre ropes. They drove simple 3-foot burrows on the top of the floor-stone and did not drcno the ground, neither did they drive their burrows straight, but crookedly. It appears to me very probable that several adjacent pits were worked at one time, each by its own set of men. The flint was worked on the spotj and bartered to the hunting * Mr. Evans also advances this opinion (Stone Imp. pp. 16 and 283), but although he shows the similarity between modern strike-a-lights and some of the ancient " scrapers," he does not allude to the identity of the former with old English and modern French gun-flints, which is the connecting link between the ancient and modern industries. t Only the larger implements, such as celts, seem to have been made at Grime's Graves. The smaller flakes were taken down to certain picturesque spots on the river side and there worked into arrow-heads. I have found several of these work- shops, and obtained quantities of tiny flakes from the arrow-heads, also fragments of pottery, burned stones which were probably used as pot-boilers, pieces of charcoal from old fire-places, and fragments of nut and bone. I am not aware that tliis fact has been before noticed. 40 MANUFACTURE OF GUN-FLINTS, ETC. tribes, and the magnitude of the works is shown by the immense number of flakes and cores which literally strew the ground in the vicinity of the old pits. It was owing to this permanent employment that the art of flint-implement making attained that degree of excellency Avhich culminated in the beautiful ripple- chipping of the surface shown in the annexed cuts. Fig. 23 being Fig. 23. — Flint Arrow-head from Chatteris. from Chatteris and probably of Brandon flint, and Fig. 24 from Fig. 24.- -Flint Arrow-head. Brandon. the vicinity of Brandon itself, and certainly of native stone. This exquisite specimen was kindly lent to me for engi-aving by my friend Mr. H. R. Maynard who possesses some very fine examples of neolithic art. So far as mining is concerned there has been a decided improve- ment since Grime's Graves were dug, but the progress has been very slow, and, I believe, not sufficient to mask the primitive orio-in. Thus the independent character of the pits and their close proximity are exactly paralleled in Grime's Graves : the similarity in the appearance of the neolithic pits and the deserted modern ones is very striking. The method ot lifting the stone is almost or quite as simple as that of yore. Then it Avas hauled up by a simple mechanical contrivance, now it is lifted from stage to stage by manual labour. In the method of getting the stone, however, the progress has been decided as shown by the ■ elaborate method already described ; but even here, although the work has been carried on so long in a faulted rock, the diggers have not dis- covered the simple law which determines the upthrow and down- throw. ORIGIN OF ENGLISH HAMMER. 41 When flint was first used for fire-arms it was merely broken into a convenient size, and each soldier had to find his own ; in like manner it is probable that when flint was first used as a material to form weapons conveniently shaped natural stones were selected. When the gun-flint trade became a special branch of industry the workmanship rapidly improved in the hands of work- men who devoted themselves solely to it, and is now brought to a state of perfection never before equalled.* So with the old flint- implement trade ; it began to improve rapidly when men devoted themselves entirely to it, and cuhninated when metal gave them better tools and before it became too common to replace the stone. The beautifully even surface-chipping of such arrow-heads as Figs. 23 and 24 is a triumph of skill and a proof of luxury ; and the ai't is lost to us. No Brandon knapper can in any way approach it, as Mr. Evans has said, and as I have verified. So far there has been a degeneracy in the working of flint. I cannot help hazarding an opinion which has been formed from tin intimate knowledge of flint-knapping and of old-implement *' workshops," that in one of the tools used at Brandon we have the lineal descendant of one used by the old flint-workers. The flakes from which the arrow-heads and some other implements were made had a single back, that is, one rib running down the centre of the back. This can be still traced on many of the worked implements, and the waste and many of the unused flakes which still lie about in thousands are of this character. (See Fig. 17.) Now these flakes were struck with a round or ovoid pebble, of which many specimens, showing the battered ends, have been found. The old English gun-flints were also made from single-backed flakes, or from flakes which had no ribs whatever, and these were struck with an oval hammer. The backless English flakes, and many of (he single-backed ones, are still struck with the ovoid English hammer. It is well known that the shape of stone tools, such as celts, were copied in bronze, and bronze patterns were used in casting iron tools. This standing over of old habits is a very common and striking phenomenon, and obtains not merely in the shape of tools, as may be seen in the gauge of railway lines, which is the breadth of the old coaches, and in a still more singular case in the aversion from the use of horse-flesh by the English, this article of diet having been prohibited in early Christian times because it was eaten in the feas^ts to Odin. Such being the case, it seems to me to be highly probable that the old English flaklng-hammer was a metal copy of the old stone-flakcr. True, the modern tool is perforated and hafted, while the imple- ments known as hammer-stones were merely grasped in the hand, and doubtless this was the fir^t method pursued ; but ovoid round- faced perforated celts are by no means unknown, several having * It is said in Brandon that at the commencement of this century the gUii-flints ■were better made than at present ; but this is at variance with the opinion I have formed from an examination of quantities of old flints still in store at the Tower. ■(■ 'fhf moderns, however, cxcvl in flak in;';. 42 MANUFACTURE OF GUN-FLINTS, ETC. been found in this neighbourhood. These, which Mr. Evans de- scribes together in Chap, ix, of his classic work on stone imple- ments, have had various uses ascribed to them. " By some " antiquaries these perforated pebbles have been regarded as " weights for sinking nets, or for some such purpose ; but in *' most cases this is, I think, an erroneous view — firstly, because *' the majority of these implements show traces, at their extre- " mitles, of having been used as hammers ; and, secondly, because, " for such purposes as weights, there can be no doubt that " the softer kinds of stone, easily susceptible of being pierced, " would be selected, whereas these perforated pebbles are *' almost invariably of quartzite or some equally hard and rough " material. " There are some instances, indeed, in which the perforation " would appear to be almost too small for a shaft of sufficient " strength to wield the hammer, if such it were ; but even in such " cases, where hard, silicious pebbles have been used, they must *' in all probability have been intended for other purposes than " weights."* Now any one of these would make an admirable flaking-hammer, and the small " eyes " so far from offering the same difficulty on this explanation as on the supposition that they were ordinary hammers, it evidence in favour of it, because the blow given in flakiu'T is not a heavy one, indeed in most cases the hammer is merely allowed to fall upon the stone, and the perforation or " eye " is always made as small as possible. The principal desi- deratum in a flaking-hammer is to get the greatest possible weight with the least possible size ; hence the eyes are made so small that they are only sufficient to carry the handle : if they could be hafted as conveniently they would not be perforated at all. Here then I would look for the immediate predecessor of the English flakino--hammer, and if the deduction be accepted it is another point in favour of the supposition that the working of flint has gone on continuously since neolithic times. Slowly as the flint-trade has progressed there are a few changes we can point to as having occurred in modeni limes. Of these the oldest and most important was the introduction of the present flakino'-hammer, which at once gave rise to the more useful and eleo-aut double-backed flints. A nother change was the abandon- ment of the collar to the knappiug-hammer by the present genera- tion, a course which shows enhanced skill in cutting the flint so that it does not fly towards the knapper. Within the last five or six years the practises of damping the stone to lay the dust has become more general, showing a greater consideration for health, of sloping the stake to make the position of the left hand easier, and the substitution of new for old leather for the stage, have o-reatly increased. Such changes show how gradually an industry i-* modified, or, as it is becoming the fashion to express it, " evolved." * Evans, Anc. Stone Imps., p. 194. ANTIQUITY OF FLINT-KNAPPING. 43 The evolution of the gun-flint from the strlke-.i-light trade has been ah-eady discussed, and no one can compare the strike-a-liglits in the collection with the French guii-flint (see Figs. 59 and 60), or the French strike-a-light (l^'ig. 21) witli the same sijcciincn without being struck with the probablHty of ihe suggestion. But these strike-a-llghts and old gun-flints are singularly like some of the ancient " scrapers," as pointed out by the astute author of Stone Implements, who further remarks, " I fiud, more- " over, that by working such a Hint and a steel or briquet together, " much the same bruising of the edge is produced as that apparent " on some of the old " scrapers." I come, therefore, to the con- " elusion, that a certain proportion of these instruments were in " use, not for scraping hides like the others, but for scraping iron " pyrites, and not improbably, in later days, even iron or steel for " procuring fire."* This is sound reasoning, and if the form of strike-a-lights has not varied since then, my suggestion of the orio-in of the English hammer is not very far fetched. I am fully convinced that in the Brandon gun-flint trade we have a relic of the true stone age, and when philologists attack the question it is probable that some of the curious words in use amono* knappers, which I have carefully preserved in this work, may be foiuid to be outliers of the old pre- Aryan tongue. The value of the study of gun-flints to geologists is greater than has been supposed, for it affords the best experience of the fracture of flint, and at once enables us to determine the natural or artificial nature of the fracture. But it does more, It teaches us to distin- guish many individual features of the flint, find of the tool with which it is struck. Those whose studies have not led them to pay particular atten- tion to flint often express doubts as to the artificial nature of some of the ruder implements, and, still more frequently, of flakes. Geologists even have been henrd to declare that some of these uncouth specimens could be matched from any gravel heap. To such I would reply that if they will conscientiously examine care- fully a gravel pit and handle the stones, they will find that such is not the case, and the longer they search the stronger this opinion must grow, until, eventually, if any doidjt remain it will rather be as to whether the specimens in question were ever found in gravel, so rare are they. If by good fortune he find one he will then assuredly treasure it as a peculiarity, even if he still doubt its human workmanship. I am perfectly convinced that it is as easy for an experienced observer to discriminate between artificial and natural flint chips, as it is for the ordinary observer to dis- tinguish stone arrow-heads from rifle-bullets. This is in conse- quence of the very peculiar manner in which flint and some other rocks fracture. It requires a. sharp rehoundin(j blow delivered ivith a definite amount of force to detach a flake, jf the blow be dead the stone is only bruised; if it be bounding, but too slio-ht, the bruising shows an incipient cone, but no flake is struck ; if, awain. Ancient Stone Implements," p. 283. 44 MANUFACTURE OF GUI^-FLINTS, ETC. the blow be too heavy the stone is shattered. Moreover, the blow must be delivered in a certain direction. Now it is possible that all these conditions will be found sometimes in nature, as when a stone is flung upwards by a torrent or wave and falls upon a larger stone or rock-surface. But it is clearly impossible that they shall occur in the majority, or even in any considerable per- centage, of cases. Hence, if we find a single flake showing the bulb of percussion, we cannot say for certain that it is artificial (unless it is one of a series of flakes, in which event the shape is modified) ; but if we find a number of them in a limited area we may be quite sure that they are the work of intelligent beings. If, again, we find a stone which shows that several flakes have been removed we may be certain that they have been struck intentionally, for the chances are infinitely against a single stone having been several times placed by nature under the requisite conditions. Besides, these flakes have all been removed at the same time, as shown by the condition of the surface, and this again makes the chances less in favour of nature. Finally, it can invariably be shown that the flakes have been removed with a pur- pose, and it is always easy to show (1) whether the flakes were struck to be worked up into arrow-heads, &c. ; or (2) whether they have been removed so as to bring the core to a definite shape ; or (3) whether the core, after useful flakes have been removed, has been worked up again to subserve some useful purpose. Again, it is always possible to tell whether a tool has been re-chipped along the edge after having been worn down by use ; and if a tool be broken, whether the fracture is of the same age as the tool, or subsequent to its manufacture. Lastly, when unfinished tools are found, as is frequent on the sites of the old workshops, the reason for their rejection can always be determined, and I have found more than one flint celt which, after being begun, has been rejected for some flaw but used as a hammer, and the blows administered as a hammer are always perfectly distinct from those given in shaping the implement. I have carefully examined upon the ground a very large number of ancient flakes and cores, and have had the advantage of the experience of Mr. Southwell, than whom none is better capable of judging of these things, and I find that the outside, waste, and useful flakes can be distinguished, and, moreover, different pecu- liarities of fracture which mark the skilled from the unskilled flaker. Nearly all these seem to have been struck with a roujided tool, and the flaking hammers must have varied in size from very large ones to very small. Most of the flakes are without backs, such as those generally struck with an English hammer; many are single- backed, and a few double or triple-backed. These latter, however, are certainly accidnntal, having arisen in two ways ; namely, either from a lar^e flake covering the faces of several flakes previously removed, having been removed to obtain a fresh smooth surface, or from a small flake having been taken off" a large single-backed one, thus leaving two ribs on a large thin surfiice. This latter seems to have been a usual practice, and I have specimens showing DESCRirTIOX OF STONE AND TOOLS. 4 5 abortive attempts to remove tliis small flake. A series of speci- mens illustrating the different stages of the old luanufacture is in process of formation, and will be deposited in the museum as soon as I have completed it. Anyone who will carefully study the present collection, will be able to distinguish the points 1 have described, and that the indi- vidual i)eculiurities of the flints may be rendily observed, I have oiven short notes of each gun-flint, and also showed whei*ein it differs from what may be called the ideal types. Although these are described as flaws, they must not be considered as evidence of inferior workmanship, for the faults l;iy in the stone, and not in the knapper, who is one of the most skilful in Brandon. Description of Specimens. Flint. 1. Quartered floor-stoue. The entire mass shows the average size of the flints as delivered to the knap!)ers. It is broken into five quarters, and the positions of the blows are numbered in their order of succession ; the arrows point to the places of percussion. No. 4 has broken badly, and the coat has been accidentally chip|)ed. This specimen well illustrates the difference in thickness between the top and bottom coats. 2. A specimen of floor-stone showing the double-coat. 3. A "pot-lid," or natural fracture. One side of the inner surface shows what is termed a " frosty face." 4. Flint from Icklingham, showing bulb of percussion. Very fine stone. 5. Outside waste flakes, called s///tT5, showing the coat. From old deep pits at icklingham. Very good stone, superior to any now dug. 6. Sinirle and double-backed flakes. Figs 16 and 17. . ■ 7. Ouf English flake. 8. Flake marked to show how it will knap ; the pieces will form icaste, one horse-pistol, three carbines, and one double. Fig. 19. 9. Flake cut into five pieces to make four gun-flints. 10. Four gun-flints made from one flake. Tools. 11. Stone-digger's pick. Has been in use. Fresh pointed for work. 12. First quartering-hammer, new. See p. 16. 13. Ditto, old, see p. 16 14. Second quartering-hammer, new. See p. 10, J 5. Ditto, old. Seep. 16. 16. English hammer. See p. 18. 17. First flaking-hammer, new. Seep. 17. 18. Ditto, old. See p. 17. 388.JG. 1) 46 MANUFACTURE OF GUN-FLINTS, ETC. 19. Second flaking-hammer, new. Seep. 17. 20. Ditto, old. See p. 17. 21. Flaking candle-stick. See p. 21. 22. Knapping hammer, new. See p. 19. 23. Ditto, old. See p. 19. 24. Knapping candle-stiok. Seep. 21. 25. Model block, with stake and stage, full-sized ; block about one sixth natural size. See p. 19. 26. Stake, full-size. See p. 20. 27. Stake leather. See p. 20. 28. Staging wood. See p. 20. 29. Knapping leather, upper surface marked. See p. 20. 30. AA^ringings. Gun-Flints. Numbered successively 1 to 33. Two points require special men- tion ; the first is that no gun-flint is made by measure, but all by the eye ; the second is that the remarks attached to each specimen only show wherein they differ from an ideal type, and do not denote inferior workmanship, for they are exceptionally well made. It will be noticed that the distinction between bests and seconds is arbitrary, and that good seconds may be as well made in every respect as inferior bests. As a rule, however, seconds are thinner than bests, or as thick but of inferior workmanship or material. Commons are single-backed, but may be as well made as bests. Double-edged flints are longer than single- edged of the same kind, because they have no heels to be cnt oft". No. 1 among the second singles is in reality a super-single, but it is left in its present condition because it was placed there by the knapper, and serves to illustrate how bests may be picked out from a mass of seconds. The dimensions given are in inches. The terms applied to the parts of a gun- flint are illustrated by the following cuts and descriptions : — ( ' a b Fig. 25.— Back, face, and side view of best Carbine. (a) Back view; (6~) face view, (c^ side view; 1, back; 2, edge; 3, heel ; 4,4, sides ; 5, bulbs or " knots ; " 6 ribs. The sides, edge, and heel are slightly hollowed, or waisted, which is considered a point of beauty. DESCRIPTION OF GUN-FLINTS. 47 1. Wall Pieces. FW. 26. — TVall Piece. W0^.— 2 0xl-5x()5. * . Make. — Siiii'-le-e(lgecl, rudely made, large flints ; very variable 111 size. 2. Large Swan. Ficr. 27. — Large Sican. Size.— I- 5x1-2 X 03. 1,1 1 Make.— Back nearer heel than edge, moderately broad ; gooU thick flint. - , , ,, .. u 1. Spotted flint, back very broad. Side-bulbs opposite each other, but unequal in finish. . i i i, •* 2. Good square back, nearer heel than front, side-bulbs opposite. A very well made flint. . 3. Back not so square as No. 2, side-bulbs not opposite, edge long and good. . , 4. Back moderately good, side-bulbs not opposite, very long front. Too thin to be a good flint. 5. Solid flint not clean cut, bulbs not opposite. 6. A poorly made flint of inferior material. • , , ■, ' 7. Very good black flint, but spotted on the edge, side-bulbs not opposite, heel-bulb prominent. 8. A well-made flint with good back, side-bulbs not opposite. 9. Nan-ow back, and consequently long front and short heel. Heel spotted, and the unequal hardness thus caused has prevented its being clean cut. Side-bulbs not opposite. ^ 1) 2 48 MANUFACTURE OF GUN-FLIXTS^ ETC. 10. Beautifully -made flint of good material, back central but rather too narrow. Bulbs oj)posite, sides equally well cut. Note. — If these flints were assorted, Nos. 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, and 10 would be "bests ;" Nos. 1, 4, 6, and 9 '^ seconds ;" Nos. 1, 7, and 9 might go as "spotted" or "mixed" flints. No. 10 would have made a double-edge, but such are never made in this size. 3. Best Musket. Fig. 28. — Best Musket. Size.—VSx 1-1 xO-4. Make. — Back nearer heel than hedge, moderately broad ; good thick flint. 1. Beautifully made flint, with good square back, rather too central, side-bulbs opposite and in centre of side, sides well cut, heel and edge quite straight. 2. AUuost as well made, but back not so square, side- bulbs op- posite and in centre of back, trace of heel-bulb. 3. An excellent flint, with back squarer even than No. 1, but not quite such good flint ; side-bulbs opposite and in centre of side ; all the workmanship is perfect. 4. A well-made flint, with back pretty square, side-bulbs oppo- site and in centre of side. 5. A good flint, with back rather irregular, side- bulbs nearly opposite, right side not so cleanly cut as left. 6. A good flint, with irregular back, side-bidbs nearly opposite, sides equally clean cut, but heel not so. 7. Back irregular, side-bulbs not opposite, heel not clean cut. 8. Irregular back, side-bulbs not t>pposite, heel not clean cut, and its bulb showing. 9. A good flint, with the most irregular rib in front, si le-bulbs not opposite. Thinner than it ought to be, and back too narrow. 10. A well-made flint, but too thin, and back too narrow; side- bulbs not opposite. Note. — Nos. 9 and 10 might equally well be called Second Muskets in virtue of their thinness. The back should not be central, but nearer the heel. It is noticeable here, and indeed generally, tiiat one side of a flint is often better made than the other; the better one being the first made. Flint, after being handled, never works so well as it would have done before. DESCRirTIOX OF GUN-FLIXTS. 49 4. Second Musket. Fig. 29. — Second Musket. Size.— I'd X 11 xO-3. Make. — Second Muskets, wheu specially made, are tbiuner than Best Muskets, but a best witb a flaw goes in as a second. 1. Was made for a best, but put in with the seconds because it was not square enough ; otherwise it is a very good flint, and superior to Nos. 9 and 10 of the bests. 2. A very good typical second, beautifully made in all respects except a slight notch on the right side ; but for this and its thin- ness it would have been a best. 3. Thick and well-made enough for a best, but with a notch on the right side. 4. Well-made enough for a best, for which it was intended, but put into seconds because it turned grey, and is wrung or twisted. Whenever the edo-e is wider than heel the flint goes as a seconds. 5. Is an inferior quality, brackly and hollow-fronted. 6. Wruno; flint ; heel longer than edge. 7. Well-made flint, but a second for similar reasons to No. 4, 8. One side badly made in consequence of the flake being thickest there. 9. Inferior edge ; not square. 10. Inferior edge wrung. 5. Double- edge Musket. Fig. 30. — Double-edge Musket. Size.—V'ix 1-2 X 0-4. Make. — Slightly longer than other muskets, but with two edges, 50 MANUFACTURE OF GUX-FLINTS, ETC. and consequently no heel. The back and bulbs are central and tlie flint of o-ood consistence. 1. Well-made flint, but rather too thin, and the back rather too broad, and not quite central. 2. A better made flint, but not quite pure in colour; bulbs nearly opposite, and central. 3. Well-made ; back not quite central. 4. One edge gapped, back too broad, and the best edge too short. 5. A^rung; too thin ; one edge too short. 6. Wrung ; one e;lge gapped ; back nearly perfect, but not quite central. 7. Too thick ; back too narrow ; edges not square. 8. Similar to No. 7. 9. Inferior back and side. 10. Good edges, but back too wide, and one edge too short. 6. Common Musket. Fig. 31. — Common Musket. (The apparent double-back is the effect of a flaw in the flint.) &ze.— l-.3xlTxO-4. Make. — Like other muskets, but single-backed. Never made double-edged ; hence the heel should be short. 1. An excellent flint; square; long fronted ; good thickness; bulbs opposite and on back. 2. Well made, but the flint has not broken quite cleanly; the right side shows will the difference in make of the two sides of a flint. 8. One side bad ; bulbs not opposite. 4. Not pure in colour : back too central. 5. J, „ too thin. 6. Thin ; back too central. 7. Good flint, but edge gapped and the "chalk'' showino- on the back. 8. Bad back. 9. Too thick ; back not straight. 10. Inferior material, shoAvs the grisly fracture on the heel. DESCRIPTION OF GUN-FLINTS. 51 7. Mixed Grey or Spotted Musket. Fliftfi}liliilii|i»*i1ii Fig. 32. — Mixed Grey or Spotted Musket.. Size.—V^xVlx^-^. Make. — Same as other muskets, but of a spotted flint. None of these, from the nature of the stone, are so cleanly cut as black flints. 1. Excellent flint, but with edge gapped. 2. Not quite so good, ditto 3. Not so cleanly cut, but with better edge. 4. Well made, but wrung. 5. Good edge, but not square. 6. Well made, but back unsymmetrical, and too wide. 7. Back too central, edge gapped, too thin. 8. Not square, ditto ditto 9. Unevenly cut, bad edge. 10. Well made, but much wrung. 8. Solid Grey Musket. ^T\«T*v.,.i^»K?S» ^_ Fig. 33. — Solid Grey Musket. (Icklingham make.) ^ize.— 1-3x1 Ix 0-4. Make. — Same as other muskets, but of grey flint, which cuts grisly. These flints vary in thickness greatly ; the above size being the theoretical one, the length varies from 1*3 to 1 '4, the width from 0-9 to M, the thickness from ()-3 to 05. 52 MANUFACTURE OF GUX-FLINTS, ETC. 1. Well made for a grey, back not. good ; too thin. 2. Ditto, but hack too broad. 3. Sides and heel rough, too thick. 4. Good back, fair sides, face wruug. 5. Well made, but single backed. 6. Good edg3, but single l)acked and wrung. 7. Faii'ly good, but with uneven back. 8. Too thin, back much too broad. 9. Too narrow and thick, wruno;. 10, Coarse flint, single-backed and irregular. 9. Chalk-heeled Musket. Fig. o4. — Chalk-heeled Musket. Size and make like other muskets, but purposly showing the coat or "chalk" on the heel, The three specimens in the collection are beautifully made in all respects. 10. Best Carbine. Fig. 35. — Best Carbine. (The draughtsman has omitted to show the trimmed heel, so that it looks like a double-edged flint.) Size.— \'2x VOX Q-25. Make. — A single-edged flint, like a musket but smaller. 1. Excellently made ; back almost perfect, but bulbs not quite opposite. 2. Very good, but the back rather too broad, and the bulbs not quite opposite. 3. Good flint, but back not quite square. 4. Very good flint, slightly Avaisted, and heel rather too narrow ; bulbs not opposite. * DESCRIPTION OF GUN-FLINTS. 53 5. Good iiint, with edge gapped; bulbs not quite oi)po6lte, and back too broiul. 6. Good Hint; sides not eqiial, and one with two bulks. 7. AVell made waisted Hint, but wiih edge gapped, and back not quite in right place. 8. Well made, but wrung. 9. Too thick. 10. Ditto, but well made ; edge gapped. 11. Second Carbine. Fig. 36. — Second Carbine. (Heel not drawn.) ^/^e.— 1-2x1 -Ox 0-25. Make. — Made for bests, but condemned for some flaw which is alone pointed out in the following list. Some might go as bests, as Nos. 9 and 10 of the bests might have been put in as seconds. 1. Flawed face ; " chalk " shows on back. 2. Wruno-. 3. Imperfect edge and heel. 4. Not square, and one side too straight. 5. Bad colour. For make any of the above might have gone in as bests. 6. Inferior back and edge. 7. Too thin. 8. „ bad back. 9. 10. )) 12. Carbine, Double-Edge. Fig. 37. — Donhlc-edcjed Carbine. Size.— \'2x 1-1 xO'25. 54 MANUFACTURE OF GUN-FLINTS, ETC. Make. — Like other carbines, but with the back central so as to make the two edges of equal length. 1. Excellently made, the only fault being a thickening of one end of an edo;e, but this is of no moment. 2. Equally well made, but one edge gapped. 4. „ but back rather too broad. 5. Good, but slightly wrung. 6. One edge gapped ; back too narrow. 7. 8. 9. 10. j> j» back too narrow. „ not central, too thin ; back too broad. The whole of these are admirably made. 13. Common Carbine. Fig. 38. — Common Carbine. (The trimmed heel not shown.) Si2e.—V2 X 10 X 0-25. Make. — Like other single-edged carbines, but single-backed. 1. Excellent, but with a gapped side. 2. „ but back too central. 3. „ edge not quite so good as above. 4. Not quite so well made. 5. Very good, but gapped edge. 6. „ but too thin. 7. Back too central, spotted on face. 8. Too thin. 10. Inferior flint. 14. Common Carbine. Double-Edge. Fig. 39. — Common Carbine. Double-edged. F^ize.—\-2x\'lxO'^6. DESCRIPTION OP GUN- FLINTS. 55 Make. — Like No. 12, but double edged; hence the back is central. I. Well made, but rather thin. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. edge not true, thin. one side grisly, back not straight, not cleanly cut, bulbs not on rib. one edge not true. Back wrung, edge gapped. 15. Grey or Spotted Carbine. Fig. 40. — Grey Carbine. Size.— 1-2 X 1-0 X 0-25. Make. — Like other single-edged carbines, but of grey or spotted flint, and hence ruder in workmanship. 1. Very good flint for spotted stone. 2. Equally well made, but back too long. 3. Edge gapped. 4. Very good, but rather narrow. 5. Good, but wrung. 6. ^Vrung and small. 7. Irregular backed. 8. Wrung and poor backed. 9. Well made, but thin. 10. Wrung, coarse stone. 16. Chalk-heeled Carbine. Fig. 41. — Chalk-hcclcd Carbine. Size.— 1-2 X 1-0 X 0-25. 0§ MANUFACTURE OP GUX-FLINTS, ETC. ' Make. — Like other sinole-edo;ecl carbines, but with the coat or " chalk " purposely showing on the heel. Two specimens are shown, marked 3 and 4 ; the former is well made, and the latter would be equally good, but that the flint shows a tendency to double-coating. 17. Best Horse Pistol. Fig. 42. — Best Horse Pistol. (Heel not shown.) Size.—\-\ X 0-9 X 0-3. Make. — Squarer than carbines, and smaller. 1-5. Perfect as ilints can be. 6. Very good, edge slightly gapped. 7. Back too central. 8. ,, narrow, edge gapped. 9. One side too straio-ht. 10. Inferior material, edge too short; it had to be re-chipped. 18. Best Horse Pistol. Double-Edge. Fig. 43. — Best Horse Pistol. Double-edged. Size.—\-\x\'OxO'Z. Make. — Similar to other horse pistols, but with back central to make the edges equal in length. 1. Excellent flint, but edge gapped, and one side too straio-lit. 2. „ . but one edge not quite perfect. 3. „ „ _ „ gapped. 4. „ but thin. 5. „ „ rather short. 6. „ „ thin. 7. Back too broad, edge gapped. 8. „ „ too thin. 10. Thin. DESCRirTION OF GUN-FLINTS. 67 19. Second Horse Pistol. Fig. 44. — Second Horse Pistol. (Heel not shown.). ^•^V.—l-l xO 9x0-3. Make. — l^amo size as bests, but rejected for some flaw such as thinness ; these flaws are enumerated below. 1. Rather narrower in the heel than edo-e. 'i. " . " 3. Inferior heel. 4. Wrung. 5. Gapped edge 6. Wrung. 7. Thin. 8. 3? 9. )) edge heel. 10. Back too thin. 20. Second Horse Pistol. Double-Edge. Fig. 45. — Second Horse Pistol. Double-edged. Size.—\-\ X 1-0 X 0-3. Make. — Like other Second Horse Pistols, but double-edored, which brinors the back to the centre. 1. Nearly perfect flint; would be a best if thicker. 2. Kather short ; back narrow. 3. Short, back not central. 4 Very nicely made but thin, 5. Good flint but short. 6. Not quite square. 7. AVrung. 8. Too thin. ' 9. Not good colour ; thin. 10. Edge gapped. 58 MANUFACTURE OF GUN-FLINTS, ETC. 21. Common Horse Pistol, or Large Common Gun. Fig. ^6.— Common Horse Pistol. Size.— \'lx 0-^x0'^. Make. — Like other horse pistols, but single b.ackecl. 1. Very good, but bulbs not opposite. 3. ,, back not level. 4. „ bulbs opposite ; rather irregular edge. 5. „ thin. 6. Well made, but thick. 7. Wrung. 8. Gapped edge, wrung, spotted back. 9. Wrung. 10. Poor back. 22. Common Horse Pistol. Double Edge. Fig. 47. — Common Horse Pistol. Double-edged. Size.— \-\xli)xQ'6. Make. — Like common horse pistol, but double-edged, hence llie back is central. These are only made for special orders. 1. Well made, but one bulb not on back. 2. Bulbs right but edges not so good as No. 1. 3. Bulbs not oj)posite, one edge slanting. 4. Too thick. 5. Very nicely made, but rather small. 6. Too thin. 7. Thin and short. 8. Thin, but very nicely made. 'J. One bad edije, 10. Wrung. DESCRIPTION OF GUN-FLINTS. 23. Mixed Grey or Spotted Horse Pistol. 59 Pig. 4y, — Mixed Grey Horse Pistol. Make. — Like others, but of spotted flint. 1. Nicely made, bulbs uot quite opposite. 2. „ edge gapped. 3. „ rather thin. 4. „ >, 5. ,, back too central. 6. One side inferior. 7. Wrung. 8. Lono-er than the others. 9. Back too broad. 10. ,. narrow. » 24. Chalk-heeled Horse Pistol. Fig. 49. — Chalk-heeled Horse Pistol. Size.—\ -0 X 0-9 x 0-3. Make. — Like others, but purposely showing the coat or " chalk " on the heel. 5. Well made. 6. Short. 7. Short-heel. 8. Single-back. 9. Poor back. 25. Super Single. Fig. 50. — Super Si?igle. 60 Manufacture of gux-flixts, etc. Size.— 1.0x0-80 X 0-2. Moke.— SimWixr lu, but smaller than horse pistols. 1. Excellently made. 2. „ bulbs not quite opposite. 3. ,, edge not quite true. back not so srood as others. 4. „ 5. „ too thin, gapped edge, 6. Thin but oood. 7. Very nicely made, bulbs pert, back too broad. 8. Back narrow. 9. „ broad. 10. ., >> 26. Second Single. Fig. 51. — Secoiid Single. Size. — \'OxO-8hx 0-2. Make. — Same as super singles but rejected for some flaw as detailed below. 1. A singuarly perfect flint in every respect. Has got in here by mistake, it is a super single. 2. Gapped edge. 3. One side too straioht. Any of the above would go as super sino-les. 4. '^rhin, broad back. 5. Poor edge, broad back. 6. Thick ,, 7. Thin, broad back. 8. Small „ 9. Poor edge and back. 10. „ broad back, thin. 27. Fine Single, or SmaU Common Gun. P^ig. 52. — Fine Sinyle. Size.— 10 xO'Sx 0-2. DKSCRITTION OF OUN-FT.INTS. 61 Make. — A trlHe narrower tlmn sii})er .single. 1. Well made, but rather thick. 2. „ bulbs not opposite. 3. One side too straight „ 4. Unsymmetrical. 5. Gapped edge. 6. „ 7. Back too broad. 8. „ thin. 10. 28. Super Double. Fig. 53. — Super Double. 6Vze.— 1-0 X 0-7 X 0-25. Make. — Between horse pistol and single in thickness, same length as, but narrower than single. ]\Iade from a wide flake, with the heel and edge cut cleanly off, 1. Beautiful edge, but sides not equal. 2. Very nicely made, bulbs perfect. 3. In make quite perfect, but wide enough for a single. 4. Very good, heel .«hoit. 5. Edge gapped. 6. Back narrow. 7. Thin. 8-10. „ The whole of those are remarkably well made. 29. Second Double or Rifle. Fig. 54. — Second Double. Size.—O-'do X 0-65 x 0-2. Make. — Same as super double, but condemned for some flaw, as recorded below. 1. Edge slightly rough. 2. Rather thin. 3. One side too straight. 4. Narrow back. All the above would do for super doubles. 38856. E 62 MANUFACTURE OF GUN-FLINTS, ETC. 5. Too square. 6. „ thick. 7. „ thin, inferior side. 8. „ „ back too broatl, 9. Small, 10. Gnpped edge. 30. Pine Double. Fig. 55. — Fine Double. 5V2.?.— 1-0 X 0-65 X 0-23. Make. — Like super double but narrower. Practically most of them are scarcely distinguishable from the super doubles, 1. Excellent flint, 2- 3. „ edge gapped. 4. Well made, but sides unequal. 5. „ but wrung, 6. „ large. ' • 5> 5,1 8. ,, back too broad. 9. Edge too short. 10. Too short, 31. Super Pocket Pistol. Fig, 56, — Super Pochct Pistol. Size.— 0-15 X 0-65 x 0-2. Make. — A small square flint, the same size as a rifle, but shorter 1. Excellently made in all respects, 2. 3. 4. 5. „ but rather broad. 6. Heel short ; flint too long, 7. Poor colour. 8. Back and edge not perfect. 9. Thin. 10. Back too broad. DESCRIPTION OF GUN-FLTNTS. 63 32. Fine Pocket Pistol. Fisr. o7. — Fine Pocket Pistol. Sizf.—0-75xO-6xO-2. J\lake. — Same as supeiv-', l)ut narrower, ami often of inferior make, wlience they might be called secoiuli^. 1. Excellent Hint. 2. 3. Thin. 4. „ hnt brond back. 5. Bad back, too narrow. 6. Too short. 7. Too thin, back too broad. 8. Short. 9. Poor. 10. Thin, broad back. 33. Old English Gun-Flints. Fig. 58. — Old English Gun- Flint. Made from English flakes. Fig. 59. — Fretich Giin-Fiint. French gun-flints of two sizes. Over 100 years old. Their identity of shape with strike-a-lights, and some old '* scrapers " is very patent. See pp. 43 and 44. Fi"-. GO.— Cut and Polished Flint. 10 2 64 MANUFACTURE OF GUN-FLINTS, ETC. Cut and polished flint. Mtide for experiment 30 years ago, but never in demand. The cost price was 9d. each. Polished French gun-flints maile at the same time. Flint Locks, &c. Double-barrelled old flint-lock pistol of very fine workmansliip. with flint inserted. This weapon takes a pocket-pistol size. Old carbine flint-hammer Avith flint inserted, Flint fired in the above pistol 100 times to show the manner of wearing. See p. 4. Ditto, showing bow a flint wears if too wide for a weapon. See p. 4. Waste. r laker's chips. Knapper's chips. These specimens show how readily distin- guishable are artificial from natural chips. Miscellaneous. Strike-a-lights. These are shown A, of ordinary shape, like large French, or old Fnglish gun-flints ; B, horse-shoe shaped ; C, straight-sided round-edged ; D, half round; J?, circular. All of these are at present made for sale, and can be matched among neolithic so-called " scrapers." They ai-e made generally from English flakes ; but (when ordered) any flake, English, single, or double- backed, is used, provided it is thick and broad. See p. 36. Discs, use unknown, made at Brandon. Ditto, from Icklingham. Square black faced-builder, with Knapper's initials, and date knnpped upon the face. See p. 35. Square, mixed-colour, faced-builder. Round, black, faced-builder. Kound, mixed-coloured, faced-builder. Random, faced-builder, with '* chip-back." Rough builder, Square, black faced-builder with initials, date, &c., like tl Indian " snake pattern " agates. le Fig. 61. — German Gun-Fli/if. 65 ON THE AGE OF PALAEOLITHIC MAN. I EMBRACE tins oppnrtuiuty of epItomisirijT the evidence recently- obtained by me, that there are three disiiuct horizons of beds yielding palje ilithic implements. Of these, which 1 propose to call the Early, Intermediate, and Late PalaeoUt/nc, thelas^t two are newer, and the first is older tlian the Chalky Boulder-clav.^ Combining the result of my own work in Norfolk r.nd Suffolk with that of others, and taking into consideration also the researches of Mr. S. V. Wood, jun., in York.-.aiire and Lincolnshire, the succession of deposits in the east of l^ngland formed during the great cycle of the glacial period seems to be as follows, in descending order : 1. Plateau Gravels, &^'c. — (Lincolnshire and Yorkshire.) Melt- ing ice ; floods. 2. Hessle Boulder-clay.— (Lincsh. and Yorksh.) Not traced fur- ther south than the Lincolnshire border of the fens. Last ice-sheet. 3. Gravel and >Sro?«rf.— Called in part Hessle Gravel by Mr. Wood. Mild period. Pleistocene fauna. Late palceolithic. Gravels of modern rivers, in part. 4. Purple Boulder-clay. — Kot traced further south than North Lincolnshire. Large ice-sheet. 5. Sands and Gravels. — Mild period. Pleistocene fauna. In- termediate palaeolithic. 6. Flood Gravels — In force in Norfolk and Suffolk. Formed by floods on melting of ice-sheet of Chalky Eoulder-elay,^ aind subsequently similar beds formed after deposition of beds 2 and 4. These are difficult to separate, and in this table are partly included in beds 1 and 3. 7. Chalky Boulder-clay. — Great ice-sheet. The most extensive of the glacial beds. 8. Brandon Beds. — Brick-earths hitherto only recognised in Norfolk and Suffolk, Pleistocene faima. Early palseo- lithic. Boulder-clay sometimes underlies these beds. This may be an older clay, perhaps No. 11, but at present 1 incline to the belief that it most frequently consists of tongues of No. 7 intruded into and beneath No. 8. 9. Sand and Gravels.— :Middle Glacial of Messrs. S. V. Wood, jun., and F. W. Harmer. 10. Contorted Drift. — Probably in part contemporaneous with No. 9. Generally consists of clays and loams much con- torted. 11. Lower Boulder-clay. — Also known as Cromer Till. Appa- rently confined to the neighbourhood of the Eatt Anglian Coast. 66 AGE OF PALEOLITHIC MAN. In passing from Yorkshire to SuiFolk we thus travel in suc- cession over four distinct boukler-clays, separated from each other by beds of sand, g-ravel, and clay, which contain a pleisto- cene fauna. It is a highly significant fact that beds containing this fauna never lie upon the surface in the district occupied by the newer boulder-clays Nos. 2 and 4. South of the R. Steeping these boulder- clays are Avanting, and there accordinolv the beds contalnino; the pleistocene fauna begin to come on. This peculiarity of dis- tribution receives a ready explanation, if we supjjose the newer ice-sheets to have more or less completely ploughed out the beds in question from the northern area. In the neighbourhood of Brandon, and indeed over the whole of the midland and eastern counties, there are no ice-formed deposits ncAver than the Chalky Boulder-clay.' In other words this district has not been glaciated since the Chalky Boulder-clay was formed. To tins immunity from later glacial erosion we may fairly ascribe the richness of its post-boulder-clay beds. But it would clearly be erroneous to suppose that all the beds which, in this area, overlie the Chalky Boulder-clay are post-glacial, since they may belong to any part of the period shown in the table by beds 1 to 8 inclusive. In determining the age of deposits which in this district overlie the Chalky Boulder-clay, we have two guides, namely, the palseon- tological evidence, and the physical. Now the palreontological evidence is very strong. There are two distinct faunas, the one con- taining the remains of living species only, often associated with the remains of neolithic man ; the other, rich in species either extinct or no longer living in our latitudes, and frequently associated with the relics of palaeolithic man. When we critically examine this latter fauna we find that while beds containing it are known to pass under the Hessle and Purple Boulder-ciays, no single instance can be cited of their lying upon those beds, or even of their occurrence at the surface in districts that have been over- ridden by the ice which deposited those boulder-clays. It seems therefore to be a legitimate inference that these beds are all of older date than the Hessle Boulder-clay ; that they are, in fact, inter-glacial, and not pre-glacial, or post-glacial. A physical cavise is thus given for the great break between the modern and the pleistocene fnunte. This conclusion is further strengthened by the fact that the mammalian fauna (which necessarily shoAvs greater change than the molluscan) is more closely allied to the l)re-glacial fauna of the old Forest- bed of the Norfolk coast, than to that of the present time, or even of the neolithic period. The physical evidence points the same way. We cannot apply the test ot superposition near Brandon, because the newer two boulder clays are absent, Itut even it we confine our attention to the palaeolithic implement-bearing gravels of the pi'eeent river-valleys "we have indisputable evidence of great changes having taken place since the gravels were deposited, as was long since insisted upon by Messrs. A. Tylor, Prestwich, and others. Further than this, I AGE OF PALiEOLITIIIC MAN'. 67 have found that pala3olithic implements (associated with the old pleistocene fauna) are not confined to the deposits in the present river-valleys, but are also found in gravels belonging to a prior drainage-system, which gravels cut across the present valleys. These are newer than the Chalky Boulder-clay. And still further, beneath the Chalky Boulder-clay itself, in a series of loams and sands to which I have given the name of Brandon Beds, palaio- lithic implements are found associated with the relics of extinct pleistocene mammalia. Where palaeolithic implements occur in deposits lying in very ancient valleys, it is clear that we cannot readily separate the remains of one period from those of another, for the containing material has accumulated steadily during a vast length of time, and moreover the material itself may have been worked over by the river more than once, and so have commingled relics of very different ages. But Avhere we have to deal with a valley newer than the Chalky Boulder-clay the case is different. This is the case with that part of the Little Ouse valley from Thetford west- wards ; boulder-clay never lies in the valley, but the valley frequently cuts through boulder-clay. We are quite sure, then, that the implements found in the gravels of this part of the valley are newer than the Chalky Boulder-clay. To these I ascribe the name of Late PalcBulithic . There are, however, remains of a yet older valley system, which is also of newer age than the chalky boulder-clay. This old valley system has been traced by Messrs. Penning and Jukes- Browne in the district around Cambridge, and by myself in the vicinity of Brandon, where it yields flint implements. The depo- sits are gravels, which now cap the hills at a height of about 70 feet above the present river. They follow definite lines, and around Brandon are peculiar fur the great quantity of quartz pebbles they contain. They run pretty nearly at right angles to the rivers Lark, Little Ouse, and Stoke, whose valleys indeed cut through them. They yield the well known *"' quartzite " implements as well as flint tools. Implements have been found at three places, Brandon Field or Gravel Hill, Lakenheath Hill, and Portway or Marroway Hill. To these I give the name of Intermediate PulceolitJiic. These Intermediate Palaeolithic beds are clearly much older than the Late Palfeolithic, for they belong to a prior drainao-e system which ran at right angles to the present one, and at a considerable height above it. Nevertheless they ai-e newer than the Chalky Boulder-clay, for they frequently repose thereon. We have given reasons for ascribing to the Late Palajolithic an age greater than that of the Hessle Boulder-clay, and it appears to me that in the absence of more definite knowledge, the facts are best explained by su[)posing the Intermediate Pakcidithic beds to have been formed during the long interval which elapsed between the formation of the Chalky and Purple Boulder-clays. The early palaeolithic, next to be described, are older than the Chalky Boidder 68 AGE OF PALAEOLITHIC MAN. a ~o clay, ami if my suggestion be adopted, we have the foUowiug sequence of events : — * Neolithic Period - Hessle Boulder Clay /Mfe Palceolithic - Puiple Boulder Clay Intermediate Palceolithic Inter-Glacial 6. Chalky Boulder Clay - Glacial. 7. Earlij Palceolithic - Inter-Glacial 8 Lower Boulder Clay • Glacial. a 1. 2. o 4. 5. - Post-GIacial. - Glacial. - Inter-Glacial. - Glacial. o ^ :'■ § •S ^ • — o o ^ C-r; ^ S fNECTION BETWEEN NEOLITHIC AItT " galleries being on an average about 3 feet in hei^%;^!-:.v^^.-^^ -If— \ — ^- \—zi 4,^^-^ Ci-"^^^-^^— — --^ ii;-:-i / ^ , — y -, ^, .-.^-^"'x ^^ -■ ' ^■.•■^'^^1 ' y ^ "'^ i^ .-__ — -5si^^5- —- -^^ [V fr— -^ ■ ■■-■ — 1=^ 1 — 1 1 v^ / — -^ •-^=^__ _■ ; == . — / / ji . — -—■ -■ FEET U Fig. 63. — Plan of Flint-Pit, Grimes Graves. (Reduced one half, from Canon Greenwell's Paper.) The white portions show the extent of the excavations. The dotted portions show the prohahle run of unexplored galleries. The large circles show the approximate area of the top of the pits ; and the small ones of the bottoms thereof, as determined by Canon Greenwell. The pits are, in reality, rudely rectangular. Fig. 64. — Corresponding portion to above of Modern Pit. (Drawn to the same scale.) *' the flint-bed removed, — a practice contrary to that of the present " workmen, who, in making their galleries, excavate the chalk " both above and below the flint. 1 he galleries vary in width AND THE GUN-FLINT TRADE. 71 " from 4 feet to 7 feet ; and the flint was worked out " beyond their sides as far as was practicable without causing the " roof to give way. The position of the galleries will be better " understood from the plan (Fig. 63), which shows their ramifica- " tions and the way they run into one another, than by description " in wox'ds As one gallery was worked out, it '* was filled in again with the chalk excavated from other " g-dleries, so that nearly the whole of them are now filled up with '• rubbish."* In the above figures I have given, for the sake of comparison, a reduction of Canon Greenwell's plan of the pit he opened at Grime's Graves, and the corresponding portion of a modern flint- pit. Before attempting to show the identity of the ancient and modern processes, it is necessary to correct a slight error in the above description. It is quite true that the present stone-digger.s burrow beneath the floor-stone. f hey still, however, work above the flint in getting wall-stone, as in neolithic times, but never "above and beiow the flint/' as seems to be inferred by Canon Greenwell. The identity between the ancient and mo.lern industries is shown in several points. Wandering through the picturesque, fern-clad wood in which Grime's Graves are situated, and then passing out into the open heath of Broomhill, one comes upon the site of modern flint-pits,, no longer worked, which rival in number their antique prototypes. It is impossible not to be struck with the similarity of aspect between the two. The depressed basins which mark the sites of their shafts ; their close proximity to each other, the heaps of chalk which surround them, can all be paralleled in the wood hard by. One striking difference has, however, been noted. The neolithic pits, as shown in the plan, are said to be rudely circular, whereas the modern shafts are rectangular. This description 1 find to be deceptive. The " choldering-in" (as the diggers express it) of the sides of the modern shafts has masked their angularity, and they now appear almost as round as the neolithic pits. Moreover, the only pit at Grime's Graves that was opened positively shows to this day traces of its original angularity along the only exposed chalk-face. If the remaining detrital matter were cleared away this contour would be perfectly apparent. Even under present circumstances I cannot understand how the true shape was unnoticed. This "difference," then, does not exist. In the extent of the burrows we find another strange connection. I have alreadv shown that their length is not arbitrary, but is determined by the quantity of flint that can be got and carried out in one day. The only bm-row fully excavated at Grime's Graves was 27 feet long, which is not far from the mean length of a modern one. It is certain, however, that the stone-folk worked in company in the same gallery, and not singly as now, as * Rev. W. Greenwell, ^I.A., F.S.A. On the Opening of Grime's Graves in ^'o^folk. Joum. Ethuo. Soc, London, vol. ii., No. 4, 1871. Page 425. 72 CONNECTION BETWEEN NEOLITHIC ART is proved by finding several picks in a portion of a burrow of which the roof had fallen in while the workmen were away.* When, however, we recollect the inferiority of the ancient tools, and the extra labour attendant upon their method of digging, it is fiiir to suggest that one man now could perform as much work as two in those old times. It would seem, then, that the folks of yore, like those of to-day, carried ont daily the products of their laboiu'. However this may be, the similarity of extent of the ancient and modern burrows is a singular coincidence, that gathers weight in the presence of other facts of like nature.! In modern pits stages are left at intervals of 5 feet, by means of which the digger gets to and leaves his work, and up which the stone and large chalks are carried. In Grime's Graves no such stagings were found, and Canon Greenwell is of opinion that they do not exist. Until the entire debris has been removed tins can- not be asserted as a fact, though it is probably true. If so, we have here a decided ditference between the two cases, but it is of little importance, for it would be difficult to say whether the hauling of the material by rude mechanical contrivances, was or was not more scientific than the manual labour of carrying the flint on the head up the artificial stages. When we compare the ancient and modern mining plans, coin- cidences again crowd upon us. In working out floor-stone the moderns drive burrows, and do not merely undercut the flint as in diiece of work " unfinished, with the tools of the workmen still lying where they had been placed " so many centuries before." These picks still retained, upon their chalky incrus- tation, the impressions of the workmen's fingers ! Op. cil., p. 427. f Canon Greenwell thinks all the pifs communicated with each otherv. This, I cannot but think, is highly improbable, founded, as it is, upon a single observation. It would imply that a great many pits were worked simultaneously. Modern pits, as I have shown, sometimes communicate, but only when the stone is good. AND THE GUN-FLINT TRADE. 73 burrowin^^ under the stone. In working from above the burrow must be at least high enougli to enable the workman to stoop and the labour of prising the stone from the floor is very great, whereas in working from below the burrows need only be made high enough fo?a man to recline upon his elbow, and thus much labour in digging barren chalk is spared ; moreover the ston9 is easier to get, fmismuch as when cracked its weight tends to bring it down. Still this is probably only an improvement on tlie old system, for it is natural that at first the diggers would not work deeper than the stone they wished to raise. A still more remarkable '' coincidence " is found in the stone- diggers' pick, and Canon Greenwell was struck with the simi- larity between the ancient and modern tools. He says, '•' The " principal instrument used, both in sinking the shaft and in " working the galleries, was a pick, made from the antler of the red deer, numerous examples of which were found in the shaft at various depths, and in the galleries. The pick, almost iden- tical in form with that, of iron and wood, used by the present workmen, was made by breaking oft' the horn, at a distance " usually of about 16 or 17 inches from the brow end, and then " removing all the tines except the brow tine."* Subjoined are representations of an ancient and modern pick drawn to the same e."). Miifhni. \ G6. Ancient. Figs. 65 and 66. — Flint Digger's Picks. scale. The Grime's Graves pick is drawn from a specimen in which the tine was broken in the middle ; and, as I have not access to a complete tool, the tij) is inserted from a broken one in my possession. 1 may add that the tip in question is more curved than usual, and I have seen specimens in which the cur- vature much more closely approximated to that of the modtrn implement. 74 CONNECTION BETWEEN NEOLITHIC ART This tool is instructive in several particular?. A one-sided pick is itself remarkable ; and, so far as I can make out, is peculiar to this locality. I have inquired of ironmongers, and have searched the illustrated catalogues of Sheffield tool-makers, with- out finding any trace of the use of such a tool in any branch of trade. If such exist, they must be of as local a nature as the one in question.* A one-sided pick possesses no advantage whatever over a two-sided tool as a. pick, it is peculiar to this district, so that we may justly infer that if it were of comparatively recent introduction there is no reason why a two-sided tool should not have been adopted. It might be suggested that they are more convenient for use in narrow burrows than the larger imple- ment would be ; but, as a matter of fact, this is not the case, for the burrows are sufficiently wide for the wielding of an ordinary pick. When we find this singular implement in use just in that particular industry in which a natural one-sided pick was used in early times, we must conclude that it is indeed a relic of the past. The prong is made longer than before, but it preserves much the same thickness. The natural deer-horn pick has a curvature in the handle which is not ill-adapted for convenient use. Just in the same manner, the most prized modern flint-picks have a double curvature, though it is very slight. The natural pick was, however, used also as a hammer, for gently tapping the flint in order to loosen it after it has been cracked. This is very patent upon some of the specimens. The picks, for the most part, w^ere made from shed antlers, and the burr around the crown was very nicely adapted for the purpose of a hatnmer-head, and this is always very much battered, and frequently entirely worn away. The modern flint-pick is also used as a hammer ; and, as shown in the figure, the part corresponding with the burr curves slightly outward, and is thickened to strengthen it. When, then, we see in one simple implement three such peculiarities as the single tine, the thickened butt, and the curved handle ; and when we find these characters common to a deer- antler, and know deer-antlers were used as flint-picks formerly, and that such picks are so excessively local, the conviction I have expressed becomes a certainty, and we may assert as a demonstrated fact, that the Brandon flint-knappers are the direct descendants of the neolithic flint-workers. Passing now to a consideration of the tools used in this singular industry, we find in one of them another coincidence utterly inexplicable on any other supposition than the one I proffer. This is in the case of a flaking-hammer, and it is highly significant that this is the only tool that requires special features to ensure its adaptability to the Avork performed with it. The quartering- * 111 Sheffield nearly all, perhaps all, kinds of tools used in every hranch of British industry can he ohtained, except those helouginy to the flint-trade. These are all made in Brandon. AND THE GUN-FLINT TRADE. 75 hammer for breaking; the stone may be of any shape so long as it is heavy enough. The knappiug-hammer merely requires to be light, hard, and elastic, and to have a cutting edge. But the flakincr-hammer is a tool siti generis, and must possess features which at once distinguish it from all other hammers whatever. Flakino-, as I have shown, is a most difficult art, and the tool with which it is performed must possess the maximum of strength, combined with the minimum of size and striking-surface. A hammer-stroke, to dislodge a flake, must be of a certain strength, and of a rebounding or elastic nature. Moreover, it must be delivered with unerring precision, and the area of impact must be small. The force of the blow is hardly ever greater than is acquired by the natural fall of the hammer from a height of a few inches. The first flaklng-hammers in neolithic, and presumably in paleolithic times also, were ovoid smooth pebbles of quartz or some such tough material. They were grasped in the hand, and were used au natiirel. The next step in the development was to sljo-htly notch one, or both, sides of the pebble, that it might be held the easier. Afterwards, the stone was trimmed to a more accurate shape, and the notches Avere cut from either side more symmetrically. The culmination of the development took place when tlie hammer was accurately shaped and ground, and the notches drilled (nearly always from each side) right through the tool, and a slight handle inserted. I have specimens of the first two stao"es, and Dr. J. Evans, F.R.S., illustrates the two last in his work on "Ancient Stone Implements." Now the character of this socket-hole, or eye, at once distin- o-uishes a flaklng-hammer from any other. In an ordinary hammer the handle is used as a lever, in order to intensify the blow, and as the object of such a hammer is to deliver as strong a blow as possible, the handle has to be made stout, and the eye large. But the handle of a flaking-hammer serves a very different puqwse ; it is simply a means of delivering the blow with precision ; it is, in fact, a guide-rod. As a heavy blow is never delivered with a flaking-hammer there is no necessity for the eye and handle to be lai'ge, and they are, in consequence, made as small as possible, in order to ensure as much weight as possible in the head. A heavy blow struck with a flaking-hammer would break the handle. I have shown, in the preceding memoir, that m;my neolithic implemenis possess this very peculiaiity of small eyes ; and that this has much puzzled archaeologists. We now see that the pecvdiarity in question belongs to a fluking-liammer, and to no other tool. The neolithic bored flaking-hammers are merely developments of the rounded pebble ; and the old English flaking- hammer of the Brandon fliiit-knappers is identical in shape with the stone tool. It has already been shown that this interesting tool w^as once exclusively used by the flakers, but has given place to the more modern French hammer, and is now nearly extinct. Passing now to the final process, the knapping, we again meet with connecting links between neolithic and modern times. I 76 CONNECTION BETWEEN NEOLITHIC ART have already expressed my opinion that tlie manufacture of flint implements at Brandon was kept alive in the interval between the decadence of the use of stone as weapons, and its re-introduction in gun-iiints, by the constant and unbroken demand for strike- a-lights. Also, I^ have pointed out the higli probability of the truth of Dr. Evans's sagacious suggestion that many of the so-called scrapers are, in fact, strike-a-lights ; and in the four following figures I reduce this supposition to a certaintv ; for we have here Fig. 67. — Xeolithic Oval Strihe-a- Light. Fig. 68. — Modern Oral Strike-a- Light. Fig. 69. — Common English Strike-a- Light. the Horse shoe Strike-a-Light and the Oval Strike-a-Light, Fig. G8, two forms of implement;-, Fig. 67, engraved from a neolithic specimen AND THE OUN-FLIJNT TK^DE/ ' • . ,77 found by myself, :iik1 pbiced .sitlc-by-side witli precisely identical specimens which I saw made at Brandon for strike-a-liglits, Figs. Fig. 70. — Horse-shoe Strike-a-Light. Fig. 71. — Strike-a-Light. 67 and 70. We may be certain, then, that many so-called scrapers are in reality strike-a-lights. But this remarkable analogy teaches us a more important lesson than the identification of the use of an ancient implement. It shows us that the present ^nxudon Jlint-hnappcrs are making the same kind of implements that the Neoliths made. This cannot be a mere accidental coincidence ; it must be a relic of the past. The gun-flint is a development of the strike-a-light, but in rather a peculiar way. It will be noticed that the " ribs " on the back of a strike-a-light run lengthwise down the implement, whereas in the gun-flint they run across. This is a "generic" difference. Now the gun-flints are not modifications of ribbed strike-a-light s at all, but of the ribless kinds made from English flakes (see Fig. 58, Gun-flint Memoir). The earliest gun- flints, therefore, had no ribs. They were rounded at the heel 38856. F 78 CO^rjjpCTlON, BETWEEN NEOLITHIC ART, ETC. like strike-a-lights, which they resembled in every respect, being merely smaller. The French gun-flints still preserve this character. A perfect gradation can be seen between ribless strike-a-lights, through ribless gun-flints, and single-backed gun- flints to the finest modern gun-flints. We have thus traced a certain community of ideas iiinning through the neolithic and modern manufactures of flint implements, which cannot be ascribed to anything but a community of origin. If the Brandon flint-knappers had re-invented the art, it is ex- ceedingly unlikely that they would have hit upon all the points discussed in this paper : the evidence in favour of my supposition is cumulative, and seems to me irresistible. As if to place matters beyond the shadow of doubt, we are enabled to contrast a really modern flint-art with the i^randon manufacture. In France the earliest gun-flint factory was started in 1719. Now we find that the French cailloteurs do not work in the same way as the Neoliths or Brandon men. Their manner of digging fiint, their tools, and their manufactured articles are all different and attest their modern origin. This is best shown bv grouping the facts in parallel columns as under : — Neolithic. Brandon. Prench. 1. Worked a number of pits 1. Do the same - -, close together. 2. Sank direct to the floor-stone 2. Do the same - 3. Drove burrows into the chalk 3. Do the same - 4. " Drew " the flint in semi- circular spaces. 4. Do the same - -Work quite differently. .5. Burrowed about 12 yards 5. Do the same - 6. Filled the worked burrows 6. Do the same - with chalk. 7. Used a one-sided pick 1 . Do the same - 8. Elaked with a round-headed 8. Did the same - 8. Use a square-headed hammer. 1 hammer. 9. Made oval and horse-shoe 9. Do the same - 9. Do not make such strike-a-lights. implements. 10. Under cut the sides of their 10. Do the same - 10. Never do this. implements. * • f ♦ • • • . • . INDEX. > 1 Ancient Flint Pits, 39, ( 9 e( serj. Arrow Heads, 40. Ashley, Mr. H., 11. B. Beckmann's "History of Inventions," quoted, 1,2. Beer Head, Devon, flint-knapping at, 14. Best Carbine, 52. Horse Pistol, 56. , double-edge, 56. Musket, 48. Upper Crust Flint, 7. Block, knapping, 19. Blood Hill, 8. Boulder Clay, Chalky, age of, 6.1. Broomhill, 9; section at, 9; hnple- uients at, 10. Biichse, 2. Building Flints, 34, 64. Burrows, flint, 23, 71. c. Caillouteurs, 37. Carbine, flints, 52-55. Catton, gun-flints at, 10. Cavenham, 14. Chalk, descriptions of beds, 7. , dip of, 10. heeled Carbine, 55. Horse Pistol, 59. Musket, 52. Chalky Boulder Clay, age of, 65. Cocks, 2. C'ollection of Gun-flints described, 45-64. •(!ommon Carbine, 54 ; double-edge, 54. Horse Pistol, 58; double-edge. 58. Musket, 50. Counting Flints, method of, 33. Cross Piece, 27. D. Darbishire, Mr.^ on Spanish Gun-flints, 15. Dead Lime, 6. Development of Fire-arms, 2 ; of gun- flints, 39, 41. Digger's, flint, 21. Dip of Chalk, 10. Distinctions between natural and artificial features in flint, 43. Dorling, Mr. S., 30. Double-edged gun-flints, 46, 49, 53, 54, 56, 57, 58. Dresden, old gun at, 2. Drying flint, 2". E. Edgwajs flints, 6. Elms Plantation, iO. Elvedon, 13; section at, 13. Lodge, 14. English Hammer, 18; origin of, 41, 75. Evans, Dr. J., F.R.S., on (iim-flints, 1 ; on Palajolithic gravels, 6 ; on knapp- ing, 32 ; on strike-a-lights, 39, 43 ; on surface chipping, 41 ; on hammer stones, 42, 75. F. Fine Double, 62. Pocket-Pistol, 63. Single, 60. Fire Arms, development of, 2. Flakes, 30. Flaking, 28. Candlestick, 21. Hammers, 16; history of, 17, 42, 75. Fleet Pits, 5. Flemish wall piece, early, 2. Flint, at Lingheath, 5 ; Sauton Down- ham, 8 ; Broomhill, 9 ; Shaker's Lodge, 10; Elms Plantation, 10; Norwich, 10 ; Catton, 10 ; Icklingham, 11 ; Elvedon, 13; Elvedon Lodge, 14; Thetford, 14 ; Cavenham, 14 ; Tudden- ham, 14 ; Iving ^[aDor, 14 ; Grays, 14 ; Beer Head, 14; Glasgow, 15; Spain, 15; geological position of, 5; des- criptions of varieties, 7 ; from Boulder Clay, 14; digging, 21-25 ; value of rough, 25 ; manufacture of, 27-38 ; origin of gun-flints, 77. digger's Laws, 22. Locks, 3 ; introduction of, 3, ]Mines, modern, 21 ; ancient, 39, 69. Trade, antiquity of, 43, 69. Floor Stone, 8 ; method of digging, 23. Flower, Mr., on palaeolithic gravel, 6. Fractures in flint, artificial and natural, 43. French gun flints. 37, 63, 78. Frewer, Wr., 10. G. German harquebus, early, 3. Gun flints, 37, 64. Glacial Beds, 65. Gravel, palaeolithic, 6, 65. Greenwell, Canon, F.S.A., on Grime's Graves, 69. Grey Cai'bine, 55. Horse Pistol, 59. — ; — Musket, 51. Grioie's Graves. 39, 40, et seq 69. Gulls, 8. Gun flints, origin of in France, 3 ; duration of, 4 ; decay of trade, 4 ; statistics of, 4 ; manufacture of, 27- 34 ; prices of, 34 ; French, 37 : des- cription of collection, 45-64. See Flint. 80 INDEX. H. Hammeis, Quartering, 1 6 ; flaking, 1 6, 17,42, 75; knapping, 18. Harquebus, early German, 3. Hewitt, Mr. J., on Introduction of flint locks, 3. Horn's flint, 7. Hutchinson, Mr. P. 0., on flint-knapping at Beer Head, 14. Icklingham, 11 ; sections at, 11, 12, 13 ; gun flints made at, 11. Implements below Boulder Clay, 68. J. Jag, details of working, 26. Julius, Duke of Brunswick, on pyrites, 2. K. King Manor, flint-knapping at, 14. Knapping, 31. Block, 19. Candlestick, 21. Hammer, 18. Leather, 20. Knee Piece, 21, 27. Large Common Gun, 58. Swan, 47. Laws of Flint Diggers, 22. Lingheath, 5 ; section at, 6. Lubbock, Sir J., 38. M. Matchlock, 2. Maynard, Mr. H. E., 40. Mining for Flint, 21-25. Modern and Neolithic flint trades, 69, et seq. Modern Pick, 73. N. Neolithic and Modern flint trades, 69, et seq. Flakes, 44. Pick, 73. Norwich, gun flints at, 10. o. Old English gun flint, 63. P. Palaeolithic Man, age of, 65, et seq. Paramoudras, 8. Percussion Caps, introduction of, 3. Pick, stone diggers, 15, 74. Pipe clays, 7. Pitted Flints, 35. Polished Flint, 63. Poor's Plantation, 5. Pot lids, 28. Pre- Aryan words, 43. Pyrites, use of, 1. Q. Quartering flint, 27. Hammers, 16. R. Ramsay, Prof. A. C, F.R.S., on flint- knapping at Glasgow, 15. Rees' Cyclopaedia, quoted, 4, 38. Rifle, 61. Rough black flints, 8. Roulette, 38. S. Santon Downham, 8 ; section at, 9. Scrapers, 76, " Seconds " flints, 49, 53, 57, 60. Sections, at Lingheath, 6 ; Santon Down- ham, 9 ; Broomhill, 9 ; Icklingham, 11, 12, 13; Elvedon, 13. Seven Trees Brick, 12. Shaker's Lodge, 10. Small Common Gun, 60. Smooth black flints, 8. Solid Grey Musket, 51. Southwell, Mr. W. J., 11, 30, 31, 33, 44. Spotted Muskets, 61. Stage, 20. Staging wood, 20, Stake, 19. Steenstrup and Lubbock, cited, 38. Stone Diggers Pick, 15. Strike-a-Lights, 36 ; ancient and modern, 37, 76. Super Double, 61. Pocket Pistol, 62, Single, 59. Thetford, 14. Tiddeman, M. R.^., on Victoria Cave, 66. Tools, description of, 15-21. Toppings Flint, 7. Tower Armouries Catalogue, cited, 3. Tower, the, flint guns in, 1, 2. Tubs, 29. Tuddenham, 14. Turkish gun flints, 15. u. Upper Crust Flint, 7. ■ V. Victoria Cave, 66. w. Wall Piece, 47 ; early Flemish, 2. Stone, 7 ; method of working, 24. West Stow, implement from, 68. Wheel locks, 3. Woodward, Mr. H. B., 11, 14. Wyatt, Mr. J., on Gun flints, 1, 14, 18, 22, 38. [354.-375.-5/79.] RETURN TO the circulation desk of any University of California Library or to the NORTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY University of California Richmond Field Station, BIdg. 400 1301 South 46th Street Richmond, CA 94804-4698 ALL BOOKS MAY BE RECALLED AFTER 7 DAYS To renew or recharge your library materials, you may contact NRLF 4 days prior to due date at (510) 642-6233 DUE AS STAMPED BELOW APR 1 2008 DD20 12M 7-06 YC 10326 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY jc ro&i -FIELDS OF THE UNITED KINGDOM ARE ILLUSTRATED BY TK ?OLLOWSNG PUBLISHED MAPS OF TKE CEOLOCICAL SURVEY. COAL-FIELDS OF UNITED KINGDOM. (Illustrated by the following Maps.) ;■ nglesey, 78 (SW). I fistol and Somfii-set, 19, 3u. ! oalbrook Dale, 61 (NE & Sli). orest of i)ekn, 43 (SE & ^^)-. (SW). (For corresponding six-inch Maps.see detailedlist.) Leicestershire, 71 (SW), 63 (NW). fewcastle, 105 (NE & SE). ^„, ,,, ,gj,N N'orth Staffordshire, 72 (NW), 7-2 (SW),73 (JNJij.SU ^Mu;. 81 (SW) ■outh Staffordshire. 54 'NW). 62 (SW). Shrewsbury, 60 (NE), 61 (NW& bW). ,Outh Wales, 36, 37. 38, 40, 41, 42 (SE. bW ). .Varwickshire, 62 (NE & SE).63 (NW & bW). al (NE), oS (NW). ork8hire.88.S7(SW),93(SW). SCOTLAND. •Edinburgh, 32, 33. 'Haddington. 32. 33. •'ife and Kinross, 40. 41. IRELAND. vanturk. 174, 175. *Oasllecomer, 12=-. 13( . ISSiSSitii^-those Maps, see detailed list.) - » With descriptive Memoir. GEOLOGICAL WA?S. Scale, s.ix ■•..!■ -• 'v>> tvifiile. le Coalfields of Lancashire, Nort'VuiiibevVancl, Cumb^rbnd, WestTPor "mi, Durham To-^-.i^-e, E.imburghshire, Had- di^tton P fe^'^ire. V .■ufre^v i.irc, Duoibartonshire, Dum- fSrr'e Lar.arkshire, Si rlingshire, and Ayrslure are surveyed on a scale of six ,i,i nes to a nine. Kancasbire. Sheet. 16. Himstanworth. 17. W:iskerley. ' IS. Muggleswick. 19. Lanchester. 6s. Section, 39. 20. Hctton-le-Hole. 24. Stanhope Surliam— cont. Sheet. 25. Wolslnghara. 26. Brancopeth. 32. White Khkley. , Vertical 33. Hamsterlt >•. 34, Whitworth. 41. Cockfield. 42, Bishop AiK-kland. 47. 48. 49. 55. 56. 57. 61. 62. 63. M. 65. »"0. T'J. 71. 72. 73. 77. 7S. 7d. 80, 81, 84. 85, 86 87 88 Clitheroe. Colne, Twiston Moor Laneshaw Bridge. Whalley. Ha^.gate. 6s. Winewall. Preston. Balderstone, &c. Accrington. Burnley. Stiperden Moor. Lavland. Blackbnni, &c. Haslingden. Cliviger, Bacup, Todmorden. 4*. , Chorley. . Bolton-le-]Moors. , Entwistle. . Tottington. Wardle. 6s. Ormskirk, St. John s, &c. Standi sh, &c. Adlington, Horwick, &c. Bolton-le-Moorg. Bury Heywood. 45. &c. 89. Eochdale. &c. 92. Bickeistaffe, Skelmers- dale. 93. Wigan. Up Holland, &c. 94. West Houghton, Hind- lev, Atherton 95. Kadcliffe. Peel S win ton, &c. 96. Middleton, Prestwich, &c. 97. Oldham, &c. 100. Knowsley, Kahiford, &c. lOL Billinge, Ashton, &c. 102. Leigh, Lowton. 103. Ashley, Eccles. 104. Manchester, Salford, &c. 105. Ashton-uuder-Lyne. 106. Liverpool, ic. 107. Prescott, Huyton, &c. IDS. St. Helen's, Bur*^on Wood. 109. Warwick, &c. 6s. 111. Cheedale, part of Stock- port, &c. 112. Stockport, &c. 4s. 113. Part of Liverpool, &c. 4s. Durbam. 4s. I Scale, six inches to a mile, 'i.oot Sheet. 'iRyton. 4S. 8. Sunderland l Kw""! **■• 10.- Edmond Byeis 4 S Sds 4s. n Ebchester. K rVooiisidp 4s. 12. Lautoydy. fi W?niaton' 13. Chester-le-Street. 6s ?: wSngton. 14. Chester-le-Street. 4s. 47. 56. 63. 65. 68. 69. 72. 73. 77. 78. 80. S!. S4. 85. 80. 87 Scale, six i; Coquet Island. 4s. Druridge Bay, &c. Netherwitton. Newbiggin. 4s. Belingham. Redesdale. Bedlington. Blyth. 4s. Swinbura. Ingoe. 6s. Crainlington. Earsdon. Newborough. CboUcrton. Matfen. _ , Heddon-on-the-Wai!. MTortlinjaberland ..js to a mile. 88. Long Bent u. 89. Tvnemoutl 92. lialt whist' . 95. Corbridge, . 96. Horsley. 97. Newcastle ii-Tj-ne. 9S. Walker. 4- . 101. 102. Allendale ' 105. Newlands. 107. Allendale. lOS. Blanchlan 109. Shofleyfiel 110. Wellhope. 111. AUenhead own. 100. 18V. 201. 204. 210. 217. 218. 219. 231. 232. 233. 234. 246. 260. 272. 273. Liniley. Kelbroo' Bin ' ,■ Ab I. Bi Hi. Calverley. Leeds. Ki))iia.x. Halifax. Birstal. East Ardsley. Castleford. Huddersfleld. Honley. Holmfirth. Penistone. YorkBliire. { •rt. Banisley. 275. Darfield. ijfi. Brodsworl . i :si. Langsell. 282. Wortley. i:s.s. Wath upon Deariv. Ci4. Coiiisborov.gh. 2R7. Low Brad jrd. :; -.. Ecclesfield. ■_ -'J. Kotherhati. i :;. II. Braitliwell. 293. Hallam M ors. is. ■2'J5. Handswor-h. ::'96. Laughton- jn-le-Morth 299. . 300. Harthill. 8, 9, 13, 14. SCOTLAND. Scale, six inches to a mile. Sdlnbur erbsbir e . Edinburgh, &c. 12. Penicuick, Coalfield. Portobello, Mussel- Lasswa le. i;e. buro-h &c 13. Temple, c. Gihnm-t^on, Burdie 14. Pathead 4s- House. &c. 17- Bruusio) Cohie y Dalkeith, &c. 18- Howgate Preston Hall. 4s. Haddingrtonsbire. Six inches to a mile. . Prestonpans, &c. Price 4s. Treneni, Gladsmuir, &c. Pnce 6«. . Elphhistone, &c. Price 4s. . Ormistoii, East Salton, &c. 24, 25, 30, 31 32 Markinch, &c. Scoonie, he North audNor^^^^^^^^^ ?^o'roS'o'f!rSSi:iVoSfi'eiaa^Ki^or\'h^SUffordshi. l.v.3.. By EoBEET Hunt, F ,; Pnrtn.,5s. 1859,1- 1866 to 1876 23. each. Part TI. The I 3d. Part IV.