iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiPPiiiiiiiiiH^
 
 THE LIBRARY 
 
 OF 
 
 THE UNIVERSITY 
 
 OF CALIFORNIA 
 
 LOS ANGELES 
 
 :
 
 MEMOIRS 
 
 TO ILLUSTRATE 
 
 THE HISTORY OF MY TIME. 
 
 By F. GUIZOT, 
 
 AUTHOB OF 'MEMOIES OF SIE EOBEKI PEEL,' ' HISIOEY OP OLIVEE CEOMWELL,' ETC. ETC, 
 
 TRANSift^TED BY J. W. COLE. 
 VOLUME IV. 
 
 
 t B S 
 
 LONDON: 
 
 EICHARD BENTLEY, NEW BURLINGTON STREET, 
 
 ^BuSTt^fjcr in (Bx^inar^ to |f)er i^ajoStn. 
 
 1861.
 
 lONDON 
 riilNTED BY SPOTTiaWOODE AND CO. 
 NEW-STEEEI SQUAEE 
 
 • •• •••
 
 CONTENTS 
 
 OF THE FOURTH VOLUME. 
 
 CHAPTER I. 
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 {From Oct. Uth, 1832, to Feb. 20th, 1836.) 
 
 Pag9 
 One of the Causes of the Policy of Conquests and Adven- 
 tures. — Radical Vice of this Policy. — Formation of Public 
 European Right. — Its essential Maxims. — Consequences 
 of the Violation of these Maxims. — The Government of 
 1830 respected them. — European Questions during 1832. 
 — . Errors of the three Northern Powers in their Relations 
 with the Government of 1830. — Prussia: King Frederic 
 William III., the Prince of Wittgenstein, and M. Ancillon. 
 
 — M. Bresson at Berlin. — Austria : the Emperor Francis 
 11. and the Prince of Metternich. — M. de Sainte-Aulaire 
 at Vienna. — Russia : the Emperor Nicholas. — Marshal 
 Maison at St. Petersbourg ; his Instructions. — Idea of a 
 Russian Marriage for the Duke of Orleans. — Revolutionary 
 Ferment in Germany. — Meeting of Miinchengr^etz. — Its 
 Consequences Affairs of the East. — Egyptian Question. 
 
 — Character, Situation, and Policy of Mehemet Ali. — 
 Situation and Policy of the great European Powers between 
 the Porte and Egypt. — Mission of M. de Bois-le-Comte to 
 the East. — His Conversatiohs with Mehemet Ali. — Peace 
 
 of Kutaieh Russia at Constantinople. — Treaty of Un- 
 
 kiar-Skelessi. — Affairs of Spain. — Death of Ferdinand 
 VII. — Question of the Spanish Succession. — Policy of the 
 French Government and its Motives. — Its Promises and 
 
 a2
 
 IV CONTENTS. 
 
 Page 
 Advice to the Government of Queen Isabella. — Explosion 
 of Civil War in Spain. — Don Carlos in Portugal with 
 Don Miguel. — M. Zea Bermudez, his Character and Policy. 
 
 — Origin of the Question of the Intervention of France in 
 Spain. — Fall of M. Zea Bermudez. — M. Martinez de la 
 Rosa, his Character and Policy. — Promulgation of the 
 
 Royal Statute Treaty of the Quadruple Alliance. — 
 
 Don Carlos, expelled from Portugal, takes Refuge in Eng- 
 land, and re-enters Spain. — Assembly of the Spanish 
 Cortes. — The Royal Statute and the Constitutional 1812. 
 
 — The Cabinet of Madrid demands the Intervention of 
 France and England. — Their Refusal and its Motives. — 
 Difference of Opinion in the French Cabinet. — Fall of M. 
 Martinez dela Rosa The Count of Toreno succeeds him. 
 
 — His sjieedy Fall. — At the moment when the Cabinet 
 of the 11th of Oct. 1832, breaks up in Paris, M. Mendiza- 
 bal and the Extreme Party enter on the Possession of 
 Power at Madrid . . . , . .1 
 
 CHAPTER II. 
 
 DISMEMBERMENT OF THE GOVERNMENT PARTY. 
 
 (From February 22nd, to September 6th, 1836.) 
 
 My Situation and Disposition after the breaking up of the 
 Cal)inet of the 11th of October, 1832. — My Participation 
 in the Debates of the Chambers from the 22ud of Feb- 
 ruary to the 6th of September, 1836. — Mj Election to the 
 French Academy. — M. de Tracy, my Predecessor. — My 
 Inaugural Discourse. — The Academy of Sciences and 
 Belles-lettres of Stockholm, and the King of Sweden, 
 Charles John. — Deaths of the Abbe Sieyes and of M. 
 Carnot. — Death of M. Ampere ; his Character. — Death 
 of M. Armand Carrel ; his Character. — Acquisition and 
 Description of Val-Richer. — The Archbishop of Canter- 
 bury, Thomas a Bccket, at Val-Richer in the 12th Century. 
 — Situation of M. Thiers in 1836. — Attempt to assassinate 
 King Louis-Philippe by Alibaud. — Affairs of Spain ; M.
 
 CONTENTS. V 
 
 Mendizabal, and his Dispositions towards France. — Tlie 
 English Cabinet jiroposes Intervention in Spain. — The 
 French Cabinet rejects the Overture. — Despatches of 
 M. de Rayneval on this Subject. — Revolutionary Move- 
 ments in Spain for the Constitution of 1812. — M. Isturitz 
 succeeds M. Mendizabal. — General Quesada, Governor of 
 Madrid ; his Energy. — Measures adopted by the French 
 Government towards Spain. — Mission of M. de Bois-le- 
 Comte to Madrid. — Military Insurrection of Saint Ilde- 
 fonso. — Courage and useless Resistance of Queen Chi'is- 
 tina. — Effects of this Insurrection at Madrid. — General 
 Quesada is massacred. — Proclamation of the Constitution 
 of 1812. — Disagreements in the French Cabinet on the 
 Question of Intervention in Spain. — King Louis-Philippe 
 and M. Thiers. — Retirement of the Cabinet of the 22nd 
 of February, 1836 . • • • .119 
 
 CHAPTER III. 
 
 MY ALLIANCE AND RUPTURE WITH M. MOLE. 
 
 (1836—1837.) 
 
 My Relations with Count Mole. — Formation of the Cabinet 
 of the 6th of September, 1836. — Different Sentiments of 
 ray Political Friends. — From what Motives and on what 
 Conditions I joined the Cabinet. — Its first Acts. — State 
 of Affairs in Algeria. — Expedition to Constantino. — 
 
 Marshal Clauzel. — The Commandant Changai-nier • 
 
 General Trezel. — 111 Success of the Expedition. — Retreat 
 of the Army. — Conspiracy of Strasbourg. — Prince Louis 
 Bonaparte. — His Failure and Embarkation at L'Orient. — 
 Motives of the Cabinet for not bringing him before the 
 Tribunals. — Opening of the Session of the Chambers. — 
 Attempt to assassinate King Louis-Philippe. — Debate on 
 the Address. — Prosecution of the Conspirators of Stras- 
 «bourg before the Court of Assizes at Colmar. — Acquittal 
 of the Accused. — Bills presented to the Chambers. — On 
 the Disjunction of certain Criminal Processes ; on the Place
 
 VI CONTENTS. 
 
 Papre 
 
 •o^ 
 
 of Transportation ; and on the Non-revelation of Plots 
 against the King's Life. — On the Dotation of the Duke de 
 Nemours. — Presentiments of King Louis-Philippe on the 
 Future of his Family. — The Bill on Disjunction rejected 
 by the Chamber of Deputies. — The Cabinet breaks up — 
 Different Attempts to form a new Ministry. — The King 
 sends for me. — My Propositions and Endeavours. — They 
 niiscax'ry. — I retire, with MM. Duchatel, Gasparin, and 
 Persil. — M. Mole forms the Cabinet of the 15th of April, 
 1837 . . . . . . .166 
 
 CHAPTER IV. 
 
 THE COALITION. 
 
 (1837—1839.) 
 
 My Disposition on leaving Office. — Family Afflictions. — The 
 Duchess of Orleans ; her Arrival at Fontainebleau ; her 
 Marriage ; her Entry into Paris. — Character of the Palace 
 of Fontainebleau. — Accidents at the Champ de Mai-s. — 
 Opening of the Museum of Versailles. — My Conversations 
 with the Duchess of Orleans. — The Princess Marie ; her 
 Marriage ; her Pursuits ; her Death. — What is due to 
 the Memory of the Dead. — Lady Holland and Holland 
 House. — Great Number of eminent Men who died be- 
 tween 1836 and 1839. — Their Characters. — M. Eay- 
 nouard and M. Flaugergues. — M. de Mai'bois and the 
 Abbe de Pradt. — Baron Louis. — Marshal Lobau and 
 General Haxo. — M. Silvestre de Sacy. — M. Laromi- 
 guiere. — Dr. Broussais. — Prince Talleyrand. — His last 
 Visit to the Institute. — His latest Acts. — Count de 
 Montlosier. — Difficulties of M. Mole's Position. — How 
 he surmounted or postponed them. — Plis internal Mea- 
 sures. — Favourable external Incidents. — War with Mex- 
 ico. — With Buenos Ayres. — Treaty with Hayti. — 
 Second Expedition to Constantino ; its Success. — Re- 
 turn of Prince Louis Bonaparte to Switzerland. — Final 
 Adoption of the Treaty of the Twenty-four Articles on
 
 CONTENTS. vii 
 
 Page 
 the Limits of Belgium. — Evacuation of Ancona. — My 
 
 Attitude in the Chamber of Deputies. — My Speeches in 
 May, 1837, in the Debate on secret Supplies Dis- 
 pleasure of M. Mole. — Dissolution of the Chamber of 
 Deputies. — Character of that Measure and of the Elec- 
 tions. — Session of 1837-1838 Successes and Failures 
 
 of the Cabinet. — Its Position after the Session. — Session 
 of 1838-1839. — The Coalition. — Its general Causes.— 
 My personal Motives. — Was it a Mistake ? — Debate and 
 Vote on the Address. — Good Attitude of M. Mole. — 
 Dissolution of the Chamber of Deputies. — Result of the 
 Elections. — Retirement of the Mole Cabinet — Vain At- 
 tempts to form a Coalition Ministry. — Provisional Ca- 
 binet Riot of the 12th of May, 1839. — Formation of 
 
 the Cabinet of the 12th of May, 1839 . . .227 
 
 CHAPTER V. 
 
 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 
 
 {From 12th Mmj, 1839, to 26th Feb. 1840.) 
 
 Situation of the Cabinet of the 12th of May, 1839, on its 
 Accession. — My own Position. — How I employed my 
 political Leisure. — I am requested to superintend the 
 Translation and Publication in France of the Letters and 
 Writings of Washington. — I undertake the Charge. — 
 Great Interest with which this Work inspires me. — My 
 "Historical Study" on the Life and Character of Washing- 
 ton Its Success. — Testimonials of Gratitude received 
 
 from the Americans. — Letter from King Louis-Philippe. — 
 Revival of the Eastern Question. — Why that Name was 
 given to the Quan-el between the Sultan and the Pacha 
 of Egypt. — General State of the Ottoman Empire. — 
 Dispositions and Policy of the great European Powers. — 
 War breaks out between Mahmoud and Mehemet Ali. — 
 Good understanding between France and England. — 
 Death of the Sultan Mahmoud. — Battle of Nezib Dis- 
 agreement commences between France and England on
 
 Yin CONTENTS. 
 
 Page 
 
 the Territorial Question between the Sultan and the Pacha. 
 
 — Vicissitudes of the Negotiations at London. — Attitude 
 of Russia. — She places herself at the Disposal of England. 
 
 — France persists in her Opposition, and the English Ca- 
 binet in its Resolutions. — General Sebastiani M. de 
 
 Brunnow in London. — Lord Palmerston. — The French 
 Cabinet offers me the Embassy to London. — I accept it. 
 
 — My Reasons. — King Louis -Philippe evinces Oppo- 
 sition. — His Motives. — The Cabinet insists. — The King 
 yields. — INIy Appointment. — The Chamber of Deputies 
 refuses the Dotation proposed for the Duke of Nemours. 
 
 — Uncertain Position of the Cabinet I leave Paris for 
 
 London . . . . . . .311 
 
 Historic Docujments ..... 373
 
 M E M I E S 
 
 TO ILLUSTBATB 
 
 THE HISTORY OF MY TIME. 
 
 CHAPTER L 
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 ONE OF THE CAUSES OF THE POLICY OF CONQUESTS AND ADVENTURES. 
 RADICAL VICE OF THIS POLICY. FORMATION OF PUBLIC EURO- 
 PEAN RIGHT. ITS ESSENTIAL MAXIMS. CONSEQUENCES OF THE 
 
 VIOLATION OF THESE MAXIMS. THE GOVERNMENT OF 1830 RE- 
 SPECTED THEM. EUROPEAN QUESTIONS DURING 1832. ERRORS OF 
 
 THE THREE NORTHERN POWERS IN THEIR RELATIONS WITH THE 
 
 GOVERNJIENT OF 1830. PRUSSIA: KING FREDERIC WILLIAM III., 
 
 THE PRINCE OF WITTGENSTEIN, AND M. ANCILLON. M. BRESSON AT 
 
 BERLIN. AUSTRIA : THE EMPEROR FRANCIS II. AND THE PRINCE OF 
 
 METTERNICH, M. DE SAINTE-AULAIRE AT VIENNA. RUSSIA : THE 
 
 EMPEROR NICHOLAS. MARSHAL MAISON AT ST. PETERSBURG ; HIS 
 
 INSTRUCTIONS. IDEA OF A RUSSIAN MARRIAGE FOR THE DUKE OF 
 
 ORLEANS. REVOLUTIONARY FERMENT IN GERMANY. MEETING OF 
 
 MiiNCHENGR^TZ. ITS CONSEQUENCES. AFFAIRS OF THE EAST. 
 
 EGYPTIAN QUESTION. CHARACTER, SITUATION, AND POLICY OF 
 
 MEHEMET ALL — SITUATION AND POLICY OF THE GREAT EUROPEAN 
 POWERS BETWEEN THE PORTE AND EGYPT. — MISSION OF M. DE BOIS- 
 
 LE-COMTE TO THE EAST. HIS CONVERSATIONS WITH MEHEMET ALL 
 
 PEACE OF KUTAIEH. RUSSIA AT CONSTANTINOPLE. TREATY OF 
 
 UNKIAR-SKELESSI. — AFFAIRS OF SPAIN. DEATH OF FERDINANT) VII. 
 
 QUESTION OF THE SPANISH SUCCESSION. POLICY OF THE FRENCH 
 
 GOVERNMENT AND ITS MOTIVES. ITS PROMISES AND ADVICE TO THE 
 
 GOVERNMENT OF QUEEN ISABELLA. EXPLOSION OF CIVIL WAR IN 
 
 VOL. IV. B
 
 2 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 SPAIN. DON CARLOS IN PORTUGAL WITH DON MIGUEL, M. ZEA 
 
 BERMUDEZ, HIS CHARACTER AND POLICY. ORIGIN OF THE' QUESTION 
 
 OF THE INTERVENTION OF FRANCE IN SPAIN. FALL OF M. ZEA 
 
 BERMUDEZ. M. MARTINEZ DE LA ROSA, HIS CHARACTER AND POLICY. 
 
 PROMULGATION OF THE ROYAL STATUTE. TREATY OF THE 
 
 QUADRUPLE ALLIANCE. DON CARLOS, EXPELLED FROM PORTUGAL, 
 
 TAKES REFUGE IN ENGLAND, AND RE-ENTERS SPAIN. ASSEMBLY OF 
 
 THE SPANISH CORTES. THE ROYAL STATUTE AND THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 OF 1812. THE CABINET OF MADRID DEMANDS THE INTERVENTION 
 
 OF FRANCE AND ENGLAND. THEIR REFUSAL AND ITS MOTIVES. 
 
 DIFFERENCE OF OPINION IN THE FRENCH CABINET. FALL OF 
 
 M. MARTDTEZ DE LA ROSA. THE COUNT OF TORENO SUCCEEDS HIM. 
 
 HIS SPEEDY FALL. AT THE MOMENT WHEN THE CABINET OF THE 
 
 11th OF OCT. 1832, BREAKS UP IN PARIS, M. MENDIZABAL AND 
 THE EXTREME PARTY ENTER ON THE POSSESSION OF POWER AT 
 MADRID. 
 
 {From Oct. nth, 1832, to Feb. 20th, 1836.) 
 
 I HAVE retraced the internal policy and acts of the 
 cabinet of the 11th of October, 1832, from its for- 
 mation to its dissolution : I shall now speak of what 
 it did externally, of the line of conduct it held, of 
 the part it played, and caused France to jpl^y? h^ the 
 European world. 
 
 For nations as well as for kings, for statesmen 
 and warriors, foreign policy is the held in which 
 imagination, ambition, and pride display them- 
 selves in their unfettered range. In domestic 
 legislation, present and ostensible interests, recog- 
 nized rights, and legal powers, imperiously re- 
 strain pretensions and hopes within fixed limits. 
 In external dealings with foreign states, and in 
 front of prospective views of power and glory, both 
 national and personal, a great temptation presents 
 itself to yield to passion, to appeal to force, and to
 
 EXTERNiVL POLICY. 6 
 
 rely on success. But Avliat if we have lived in an 
 epoch of prodigious wars and enterprises, — if we 
 have seen states, great or small, adjoining or remote, 
 incessantly overrun, conquered, dismembered, parti- 
 tioned, alternately changing extent, form, name, and 
 master ? Such exhibitions, even when at the close of 
 the drama astounding reverses have decried them, 
 leave a vast number of minds in prey to the fever 
 of war or ambition, solacing themselves with military 
 or pohtical complications, with schemes of alliance 
 and plans of campaigns. Gigantic exploits excite 
 chimerical projects; reminiscences engender dreams. 
 From its birth, and through the entire course of its 
 life, the government of 1830 had to contend against 
 this posthumous passion for adventure and conquest. 
 The decline was great. In place of the National 
 Convention and the Emperor Napoleon, were substi- 
 tuted a sophistical advocate and a declamatory soldier, 
 who proclaimed themselves the patrons of ambitious 
 and warlike policy. But, notwithstanding their 
 emphatic mediocrity, M. Mauguin and General La- 
 marque interpreted sentiments very generally ex- 
 panded through the country, and on that account they 
 exercised actual power. They spoke in the name of 
 revolutionary and military traditions ; they united 
 and confounded, in an incoherent but brilliant amal- 
 gam, the promises of liberty and the illusions of 
 force, the Revolution and the Empire. France had 
 no desire to renew either of those terrible systems; 
 she felt in the inmost recesses of her soul, that, to 
 enjoy their benefits and escape their disasters, it was 
 
 B 2
 
 4 EXTEENiVL POLICY. 
 
 necessary to repudiate openly tlieir errors and tlieir 
 crimes. But still dazzled and disturbed, she took 
 pleasure in hearing them confusedly celebrated and 
 under imposing names. In this, it was said, the 
 liberal and national spirit were combined; greatness 
 for France, and progress for Europe. 
 
 I recognize no idea more radically false and per- 
 nicious, more belied by experience, more opposed to 
 the true tendencies of our age, as well as to the 
 aggrandizement of France and the general advance 
 of Europe. 
 
 Europe is a society of peoples and states, at onee 
 similar and opposite, separated but not estranged; 
 not alone neighbours, but relatives; reciprocally 
 united by moral and material ties, which cannot be 
 broken up; by the intermingling of races, by com- 
 munity of religion, by analogy of ideas and manners ; 
 by numerous and continued relations, whether indus- 
 trial, commercial, political, or literary ; by advances of 
 civilization, varied and unequal it is true, but all 
 tending to the same ends. The multiplied European 
 communities know, comprehend, visit, and imitate 
 each other, with mutual and incessant modification. 
 Through all the differences and contests of the modern 
 world a deep and dominant unity reigns in its moral 
 life as in its destinies. Let us call it Christianity. 
 In this is comprised our original character and our 
 glory. 
 
 This great fact has, as a natural consequence, pro- 
 duced the formation of a public, European, and 
 Christian law, or, as we may say, the establishment
 
 EXTEENAL TOLICY. 5 
 
 of certain principles understood and accepted as the 
 rule in all intercourse between states. This law, 
 for a long time, and even at the present day, extremely 
 imperfect, often disowned and violated, is not the less 
 real, and becomes more and more clear and imperative 
 in projDortion as general civilization develops itself, and 
 the mutual relations of peoples are more frequent and 
 intimate. 
 
 The essential and undisputed maxims of public 
 European law are few in number. Amongst the 
 principal we may include the following. 
 
 1. Peace is the normal condition of nations and 
 governments. War is an exceptional fact, Avhich 
 ouo^ht to have a legitimate cause. 
 
 2. The different states are entirely independent of 
 each other with regard to their internal affairs ; each 
 constitutes and regulates itself according to the most 
 suitable principles and forms. 
 
 3. As long as states are at peace, their respective 
 governments are bound to do nothing that may tend 
 to disturb mutually their internal order. 
 
 4. No state has a right to interfere in the internal 
 position and government of another state, unless its 
 own individual security renders such intervention in- 
 dispensable. 
 
 These salutary maxims have been exposed, in our 
 days, to the roughest trials. Sometimes they have 
 been outrageously trampled upon, to give free course 
 to the passions they are expressly framed to control ; 
 again, at other times, they have been scandalously 
 abused to promote designs they distinctly condemn. 
 
 B 3
 
 6 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 We have taken part in immense wars, entered into with- 
 out legitimate motive, from egotistical and inordinate 
 ambition, or to realize arbitrary and frivolous com- 
 binations under an assumption of greatness. We 
 have seen an encroaching propagandism carry to ex- 
 tremes its violence and tyranny under the name of 
 liberty. Great governments have oppressed the in- 
 dependence of small states, to maintain amongst them, 
 as with themselves, the principles and forms of abso- 
 lute power. Others have laughed at the privileges 
 and existence of established authorities, under the 
 pretext of restoring the rights of nations. Revolu- 
 tionary conspirators have demanded the principle of 
 non-intervention to cover their plots against the 
 security of states in general. Indignant at so many 
 opposite excesses, some honest and superficial minds 
 have wished to suppress external policy altogether, 
 and to place the independence of nations and the 
 safety of states under the guarantee of perpetual 
 peace and diplomatic inaction. We do not struggle 
 against violence and hypocrisy with chimeras ; neither 
 shall we attempt to annul the external activity of 
 governments at the very moment Avhen the foreign 
 relations of diiferent countries are extending and 
 multiplying themselves. What we require is, that 
 this activity should be exercised in conformity mth 
 justice and sound sense. Herein is comprised the 
 object of public European law such as it has existed 
 for ages. This law has not perished under its checks. 
 Despite the heavy and numerous blows it has re- 
 ceived, tliese very attacks and their injurious conse-
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 7 
 
 quences have rendered its maxims, and continue daily 
 to render them, more defined and urgent. From 
 their empire alone we may hope, as far as the imper- 
 fection of all human affairs permits, for the habitual 
 maintenance of peace, and for the mutual indepen- 
 dence and security of states. 
 
 This is not a mere philosophical conviction. For 
 more than three centuries, the facts, the greatest facts 
 of history speak loudly to the point. Every state which 
 long and shamelessly violated the essential maxims 
 of public European law, ended by finding itself, 
 government and people, in a deteriorated condition. 
 In the sixteenth century, Charles Y. paraded his 
 ambition and power throughout all Europe, mthout 
 respect for peace, for the independence of states, or 
 for the traditional rights of princes and nations. He 
 attempted, if not actual monarchy, at least supremacy 
 over Europe. He became wearied and disgusted "with 
 the labour, and bequeathed to Spain the reign of 
 Philip II., who, following up in his turn, without genius 
 as without heart, the same pretensions, left, when 
 dying, his kingdom stripped externally of its noblest 
 provinces, and within enervated and stricken with 
 barrenness. In the seventeenth century, Louis XIY., 
 abandoning the organized restraint of Henri lY., 
 resumed with increased ostentation the European 
 dream of Charles Y., and arrogantly violated, as well 
 towards nations as sovereigns, the principles of public 
 justice and Christianity. After the most brilliant 
 successes he found himself unable to sustain the 
 burden they imposed on liim ; mth great difficulty he 
 
 B 4
 
 8 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 obtained from Europe a peace as humiliating as it 
 Avas indispensable, and died, leaving France exhausted 
 and almost compelled for more than half a century to 
 confine herself to a foreign policy of the most limited 
 pretensions and most inert character. We have our- 
 selves seen, on even a more extended scale, the same 
 extravagances of human ambition end in similar 
 ruin. 
 
 To what an extent in Europe did the power of the 
 French Revolution manifest itself ! — at one time anar- 
 chically let loose by its popular assemblies, at another 
 despotically mastered by the Emperor Napoleon. 
 Under both forms it achieved the most astounding 
 victories; but while triumphing, it trampled on the 
 2)rinciples, the traditions and establishments of public 
 European law, and after twenty-five years of blindly 
 imperious domination, it was compelled to purchase, 
 at an extravagant price, peace from that very Europe 
 the theatre and material of its conquests. In the 
 course of three centuries, the most illustrious in the 
 annals of history, the three greatest empires the world 
 has ever seen fell into a rapid decline, because they 
 insolently contemned and violated the common law 
 of Europe and of Christianity. Three times that 
 law, after enduring the most violent shocks, raised 
 itself again above the power and ascendency of genius 
 and glory. 
 
 It was the fundamental characteristic of the govern- 
 ment of 1830 to have adojoted the j)ublic law of 
 Europe as the rule of its external policy, not alone 
 in words and in official dii)lomacy, but in fact and in
 
 EXTERNAL TOLICY. 9 
 
 actual conduct. We did not hypocritically maintain 
 and practise any special maxim of that law, which 
 might appear convenient to the new power we were 
 called upon to establish; we loyally accepted and 
 respected its maxims in the aggregate, the most 
 difficult to reconcile, as well as the simplest; those 
 which consecrated the order established between 
 different states, as also those which protected the in- 
 dependence and free internal development of each 
 state in particular. After 1830 we found ourselves 
 at issue with all the questions which had long ex- 
 cited, and still continue to excite, so much clamour in 
 Europe; Avith questions of nationality, of interven- 
 tion, of insurrection, of territorial acquisition, and 
 of natural frontiers. In Germany, in Poland, in Italy, 
 in Switzerland, in Spain, in Belgium, these questions 
 were at that time in play, either separately or in con- 
 junction. We solved them all according to the prin- 
 ciples of public European law : occasionally we treated 
 these rights with diffidence, at other times we acted 
 on them without hesitation ; here we interfered, there 
 we abstained, and in some cases we declared that we 
 should interpose if others did. Everywhere we placed 
 at the service of human and liberal policy the moral 
 influence we were able to exercise. In no instance 
 did we disavow or exceed the lunits of international 
 rights. 
 
 I have already named the motives, political and 
 moral, public and personal, by which King Louis- 
 Philippe and his advisers, from their first advent to 
 power, were induced to desire and promote the main-
 
 10 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 tenance of peace in Europe. It was not alone for the 
 direct benefit of peace itself, however powerful that 
 consideration may be, and ought to be held. Ex- 
 ternal inaction is not always the compelled condition 
 of states. Great national interests may recommend 
 and authorize war. It is an honest error, but still an 
 error to believe, that to be just, every war must of 
 necessity be exclusively defensive. There have been, 
 and there will be again, natural conflicts and legiti- 
 mate changes of territory between different countries. 
 Instincts of aggrandizement and glory are not, in all 
 cases, interdicted to nations and their rulers. When 
 Charles X., in 1830, declared hostilities against the 
 Dey of Algiers, that could not be called on our part a 
 defensive war; yet was it, nevertheless, legitimate. 
 In addition to the insult we had to revenge, we also 
 satisfied a great and lawful interest, not only French, 
 but European, by delivering the Mediterranean from 
 the pirates who had infested it for ages. The con- 
 quest of the Eegency was also equally lawful ^vith 
 the war, for it was the only method of reaUy and 
 permanently accomplishing that deliverance. But 
 the rights of ambition, if such a phrase may be per- 
 mitted, vary according to the times. The spirit of 
 war and conquest did not formerly lead to the conse- 
 quences^ which accompany it at present. Throughout 
 all Europe it met mth obstacles, counterpoises, and 
 limitations ; its breeze excited no universal hurricane. 
 The most ambitious enterprises of Charles V. and of 
 Louis XIV. neither imperilled every state in Europe, 
 nor shook the foundations of human society. They
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 11 
 
 were able to pause, and did pause in fact, or rather 
 were compelled to pause in their successes and objects. 
 Europe at present is one vast body more essentially 
 single and susceptible. All vital questions spring 
 up and ferment throughout. Every evil is conta- 
 gious, every disturbance becomes general. When a 
 great enterprise commences, no one can calculate its 
 range, or promise that it will stop on the brink 
 towards which it verges. The problem is invariably 
 found to be more vast and complicated than was fore- 
 seen; a blow struck in a corner shakes the entire 
 edifice ; movement is ever on the point of becoming 
 chaos. 
 
 But at least chaos preceded creation, and ruins 
 were transformed into new edifices ! This avails 
 nothing. What remains of all the territorial over- 
 throws, of all the diplomatic combinations, of all the 
 states called into being by the external policy of the 
 national Convention and the Empire? Everything 
 has fallen and disappeared, republics and kingdoms, 
 foundations and conquests. So much imagination, 
 boldness, and power, displayed in utter contempt of 
 public justice, produced only the ruin of the great 
 performers in these ephemeral achievements, and 
 brought on the reaction of the Congress of Vienna, 
 and of the Holy Alliance. 
 
 Much is said at present of the new state of social 
 institutions, of the new spirit by which they are in- 
 fluenced, of the necessity of comprehending and satis- 
 fying their requirements, aspirations, and tendencies ; 
 while in all that applies to the relations of states with
 
 12 EXTEKNAL POLICY. 
 
 each other, these precepts of quick-sighted innovation 
 are absolutely disavowed. We still crawl on in the 
 same beaten track so long trodden by the foreign 
 policy of Europe. Unbridled ambition and force 
 have found their favourable epochs not only for tran- 
 sitory successes, but for solid triumphs. In the midst 
 of coarse and violent manners, when the great majority 
 of states were still unsettled and in the throes of for- 
 mation, — amongst peoples who neither united closely 
 their daily interests, nor held regular and permanent 
 intercourse, in the absence of that universal and 
 rapid communication which in our day has trans- 
 formed all nations into one enormous public, ever 
 present and attentive at the spectacle of passing 
 events, — ^war, even divested of lawful or specious 
 motives, however unrestrained in its pretensions and 
 enterprises, quickly disposed of sovereignties and 
 territories, and terminated in durable results. As- 
 suredly neither Alexander nor Charlemagne was en- 
 dowed "svith greater genius nor wielded greater power 
 than Napoleon ; and their empires also fell with them, 
 but not as his subsided. The dominions of Alexander 
 were broken up into Idngdoms for his generals ; those 
 of Charlemagne were divided amongst his descen- 
 dants. At both periods the gigantic edifice gave 
 way, but other buildings immediately arose from its 
 ruins and flourished in permanence. Of the states 
 subdued and the thrones erected by Napoleon, none 
 survived him for the advantage of any; and, by a 
 strange phenomenon, the only one of his generals who 
 retained royalty held it not at his hands. The fact
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 13 
 
 was, that Napoleon in his foreign policy disregarded 
 the true tendencies of humanity. The tune has 
 passed away for great territorial overthrows, accom- 
 plished solely by strokes of war, and regulated by the 
 exclusive will of the conquerors. Scarcely are their 
 strong hands mthdrawn when their works are ques- 
 tioned, and attacked by the two powers which con- 
 stitute the good and evil genius of our age, — the 
 spirit of civilization, and the spirit of revolution. The 
 first invokes the empire of justice in the bosom of 
 peace; the second appeals incessantly to force, and 
 endeavours to establish at all hazards, by anarchy 
 alternated with tyranny, what it designates the reign 
 of pure democracy. It is between these two powerful 
 excitements that the present contest which embroils 
 Europe, and will decide her future, is exclusively 
 engaged. In this state of European society, respect 
 for international law becomes with every well-regu- 
 lated government not only an imperative duty, but 
 a necessary precaution. In our days, the ambition 
 which disturbs the world in contempt of this law, and 
 for the gratification of its own desires, is equally 
 senseless and criminal. 
 
 When the cabinet of the 11th of October, 1832, 
 assumed ofiice, the greater number of the inter- 
 national questions which had agitated Europe were, 
 if not silenced, at least lulled. Poland had sub- 
 mitted; Italy seemed to slumber again; Spain re- 
 mained motionless under her sick King ; Switzerland 
 deliberated patiently on the form of her federal con- 
 stitution. The Belgic question alone remained in
 
 IJ: EXTERNAL TOLICY. 
 
 doubt, and excited some uneasiness as to the peace of 
 Europe. I have previously mentioned, and all the 
 world remembers, the diplomatic arrangement be- 
 tween France and England, which led to the siege 
 and capture of Antwerp. It is unnecessary to re- 
 peat the details. I do not write the general history 
 of that time ; I merely undertake to characterize its 
 policy and the part I took in it. It was most espe- 
 cially in the Belgic question that our sincere and 
 steady adherence to the principles of public European 
 law completely manifested itself. We had in that 
 matter to defend ourselves from all the temptations 
 which could assail a government on the day after 
 a revolution, — temptations at once revolutionary, 
 dynastic, and bearing on territorial aggrandizement. 
 We resisted them all. And at the same time we 
 vindicated and caused Europe to admit the interests of 
 security and dignity Avhich appertain to France on 
 that frontier. We seconded the impulse of the Bel- 
 gian population in favour of the national indepen- 
 dence and political liberty they have enjoyed for 
 thirty years, — a considerable segment even in the life 
 of a nation. 
 
 In this affair, as in all their relations with the 
 government of King Louis-Philippe, the three leading 
 powers of the North, and the secondary states who 
 attend them as satellites, proved themselves deficient, 
 not in wisdom, but in that consistent firmness which 
 gives to wisdom all its fruits. Austria, Prussia, and 
 Itussia offered no opposition to the separation of 
 Belgium and Holland. They sat in conference with
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 15 
 
 France and England to enrol the accomplished fact 
 in the European system, and to settle the relations 
 of the two new states ; they accepted, or allowed to 
 pass without effective resistance, and finally sanc- 
 tioned, all the details so laboriously debated which 
 the question successively involved. But while ac- 
 knowledging the necessity, they yielded to it with 
 that hesitation and discontent which divest modera- 
 tion of its merit, and destroy the confidence it ought to 
 insjjire. It was perfectly natural that, in the negotia- 
 tions on the Belgian question, they should support 
 the interests of the King of Holland ; that they should 
 advocate and watch over a general respect for treaties, 
 while at the same time they consented to modify 
 them in concert : and that the intimate understandino- 
 of France and England should excite their warm dis- 
 pleasure. But in the midst of these natural con- 
 sequences of their position, their policy towards the 
 newly-established government of France might and 
 ought to have been uniform, and exempt from con- 
 tradictions and mental reservations. It was nothing- 
 of the kind. Absolute governments, when they have 
 not a great man at their head, are more controlled 
 by their prejudices and more uncertain in their acts 
 than free legislations. Despite their ostentatious 
 irresponsibility, the burden of power oppresses them, 
 and to lighten it they voluntarily take refuge in in- 
 consistency and inertness. 
 
 While accepting what had passed in France and 
 around her since 1830, the policy of the continental 
 powers was narrow and short-sighted, without bold-
 
 16 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 iiess or grandeur. The origin of the new French 
 monarchy, the confusion and struggle of" its principles, 
 the disorders which had beset its cradle and still pur- 
 sued it, the evil traditions and objectionable language 
 of a portion of its adherents, — all these circumstances 
 darkened and perplexed the eyes of the old govern- 
 ments of the continent. They did not foresee, and 
 even after years of experience they were incapable 
 of appreciating at its true value, what formed the 
 practical merit, and will constitute the historical 
 honour, of the government of King Louis-Philippe. 
 The issue of a revolution, that government at once 
 and distinctly renounced the revolutionary spirit, 
 both in its internal and foreign relations ; it refused 
 to take into its service the policy of disorder in con- 
 junction with that of order, alternately exercising both, 
 according to the desires of its ambition or the em- 
 barrassments of its position ; it perseveringly regu- 
 lated its acts in a conservative spirit, in accordance 
 with the public law of Europe. The continental 
 powers did not meet this difficult constancy with a 
 just return. On their part, their attitude towards the 
 monarchy differed from their conduct, and their un- 
 restrained expressions from their official language. Ill- 
 will alternately penetrated and displayed itself behind 
 friendly overtures and pacific declarations. On the 
 22nd of March, 1834, M. de Barante wrote to me 
 from Turin as follows : " They resign themselves to us 
 with a reserved hope, more or less indulged, that we 
 shall fall into misfortune ; " and again on the 28th of 
 November following : " They submitted to us at first
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 17 
 
 with astonishment and fear ; afterwards they looked 
 on our stru2:o:le ao^ainst disorder with a malevolent 
 hope ; and more recently with an idea that, if we were 
 successful, our victory would- turn to the advantage 
 of absolute power. At present they are disposed to 
 acknowledge us as liberals rather than jacobins, 
 cahn but strong. Even now they are not quite de- 
 cided on the question." 
 
 Although the understanding between Austria, 
 Prussia, and Russia was general and permanent, the 
 characters and personal sentiments of the heads of 
 these states, sovereigns and ministers, differed ma- 
 terially, and carried into their relations with the 
 government of King Louis-Philippe important dis- 
 tinctions. 
 
 Of the three persons who at that time directed the 
 affairs of Prussia, — the king, Frederic William III., 
 the Prince of Wittgenstein, his most confidential 
 adviser, and M. Ancillon, his minister for Foreign 
 Affairs, — not one was endowed with eminent ability, 
 or calculated, by natural superiority of mind, to im- 
 press on Europe his ideas and desires ; but all had 
 dispositions and qualities which worked well together, 
 and fitted them to exercise a salutary influence on 
 European politics. The King, while inclining to the 
 principles of absolute monarchy and the traditions 
 of the Holy Alliance, evinced no systematic or inve- 
 terate antipathy to other maxims and forms of go- 
 vernment. If he had not realised the political hopes, 
 which in the national movement from 1813 to 1815 
 he had allowed his subjects to entertain, it arose less 
 
 VOL. IV. c
 
 18 EXTERNAL TOLICY. 
 
 froiri a jealous passion for power than from an anxious 
 sentiment of the inherent difficulties attached to free 
 constitutions, of the confusion they might introduce 
 into the state, or of the embarrassment they might 
 occasion to himself. He had at least, in concert with 
 his chancellor, the Prince of Hardenberg, carried out 
 extensive and liberal reforms in the civil administra- 
 tion of Prussia. He was a sensible, well-meaning 
 monarch, the trials of whose life had enlightened and 
 strengthened, while at the same time they had fa- 
 tigued him. Equally desirous of repose, \vithin and 
 without, simple, economical, and reserved, he imposed 
 respect on his people and confidence on his allies 
 ■without requiring much from them in return. He 
 had learned to understand the exigencies of difficult 
 positions, to appreciate the full responsibility of go- 
 vernment, and he felt thanldul to the sovereigns, his 
 neighbours, who assisted him to bear the burden in 
 his own states by sustaining it in their own, regu- 
 larly, peaceably, and for the advantage of European 
 order. The revolution of July had caused him to feel 
 more angry with Charles X. than irritated against 
 his necessary substitute. The moderation of King 
 Louis- Philippe pleased him. His ability inspired 
 him with confidence, and he sincerely desired the 
 consolidation of his throne, notwithstanding the ob- 
 jectionable example of the revolution wliich had placed 
 hun there. The Prince of Wittgenstein, a courtier 
 and a man of the world, formed in the school of the 
 eighteenth centuiy, and of Frederic II., of an acute, 
 enlightened, and unfettered spirit, neither a liberal in
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 19 
 
 avowed opinions nor a professed politician, the de- 
 voted friend without being the ambitious rival of the 
 King, his master, a true-hearted German as well as 
 a patriotic Prussian, and a constant correspondent of 
 Prince Metternich, but strongly inclined to French 
 manners ; — this nobleman confirmed and seconded 
 the King in his impartial policy, tranquil and well- 
 disposed towards France, and at the same time 
 faithful to the alliance of the three courts. No 
 influence can be more effectual at any given moment 
 than that of a man who habitually affects none, and 
 offers nothing beyond the advice and services re- 
 quired of him. Such was the influence of Prince 
 Wittgenstein at the court of Berlin, exercised not 
 only as regarded the King but over the whole royal 
 family, in all of whom he contributed skilfully to 
 maintain respect and obedience for their head. 
 
 Of much less importance, although more di- 
 rectly in the conduct of affairs, was M. AnciUon, 
 the publicist, historian, moralist, and philosopher; a 
 man of little originality or power in these different 
 careers, but ever judicious, clear-sighted, and concili- 
 atory, arranging and defending the King's policy with 
 dignity and perseverance. With a government thus 
 organized, the French minister at Berlin, M. Bresson, 
 ardently devoted to the policy of his own country and 
 sovereign, thirsting for success, vigilant with ardour, 
 and dexterous with authority, sometimes even with 
 enthusiasm, had acquired a commanding position and 
 effectual credit. The King, Frederic William III., 
 listened to him with confidence and treated him with 
 
 c 2
 
 20 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 favour. He established a close intimacy with Prince 
 Wittgenstein, visited him almost every day Avithout 
 any political urgency, for the sole enjoyment of social 
 intercourse, and thus found himself ever in a condi- 
 tion to turn personal regard to the advantage of 
 public affairs whenever the latter j)i'esented them- 
 selves. 
 
 At Vienna, the position of the government of 1830 
 and its representative was more difficult. The prin- 
 ciples and passions of absolutism predominated at 
 that court, and seemed to encounter no opposition 
 from the Austrian public. The Revolution of 1830 
 was looked upon with an evil eye, and the society of 
 Vienna felt towards the agents of the government 
 which that movement had established, the worldly 
 coldness which, despite its frivolity, embarrasses and 
 seriously envenoms the relations of states. The Emperor 
 Francis II., moderate by character and experience, 
 and thoroughly sincere in his desire for peace, had at 
 the same time a profound antipathy against all free 
 governments issuing from revolutionary action ; and 
 he conceived that he did quite enough in their favour 
 by abstaining in his policy from all hostile practices. 
 Under this monarch, more influential himself in his 
 affairs than has generally been believed, and in the 
 midst of an independent and haughty aristocracy, 
 (dthough without constitutional or traditional liberty, 
 Prince Metternich had directed for more than twenty 
 years the foreign policy of Austria. He possessed a 
 lofty mind, and appeared to place his credit and 
 enjoyment on all occasions in a somewhat ostenta-
 
 EXTEENAL POLICY. 21 
 
 tious display of liberalism and impartiality; but 
 while perfectly comprehending and admitting, when 
 compelled by necessity to do so, the new aspect of 
 states, he desired only to maintain intact the Euro- 
 pean edifice, such as it had been constructed by the 
 Congress of Vienna, the apogee of his influence and 
 glory. No man ever encouraged within himself so 
 much intellectual movement ; while devoted to the 
 defence of jDolitical immobility when he spoke, and 
 even more when he wrote, in the midst of a length- 
 ened prolix style, loaded with periphrases and am- 
 bitiously philosophical, it was easy to detect a rich, 
 varied, and profound intelligence, eager to seize upon 
 and discuss general ideas, and abstract theories ; and 
 at the same time singularly practical and sagacious, 
 skilful in unravelling what the state of facts or the 
 dispositions of men commanded and allowed, yet ever 
 confining itself strictly within the narrow limits of 
 the possible, while assuming the air of disporting in 
 the boundless regions of thought. When at leisure, 
 and in the fi^eedom of conversation, M. de Metternich 
 evinced an inquiring interest in all questions of lite- 
 rature, philosophy, science, and art. He possessed 
 and took pleasure in displaying on these topics taste, 
 imagination, and systematic theories; but no sooner 
 did he enter on politics, than he subsided at once 
 into the least experimental of all practitioners, the 
 most devoted to established facts, and the most op- 
 posed to all morally ambitious innovations. From 
 his quickness of general comprehension, combined 
 with prudence when action was called for and the con- 
 
 c 3
 
 22 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 tinued success resulting from this douljle endowment, 
 Prince IMetternicli had derived a confidence singu- 
 larly, and I may even say, ingenuously presumptuous 
 in his own views and judgment. In 1848, during 
 our mutual retirement in London, " a conviction of 
 error," said he to me one day, with a half smile Avhich 
 seemed to justify his words beforehand, " has never 
 approached my mind." " I have been more fortunate 
 than you, Prince," I replied; "on several occasions 
 I have satisfied myself that I was mistaken." His 
 manner told me that he approved my modesty -svith- 
 out wavering, at the bottom of his heart, in his own 
 presumption. The quality most wanting in his po- 
 litical talent was courage. I mean the courage of 
 impulse and enterprise. He had no genius for con- 
 test, the dangers of wliich he feared more than he 
 coveted the successes to which it might lead. Herein 
 lay his chief embarrassment in his relations with the 
 government of King Louis-Philippe. He rendered 
 it full justice, acknowledged its importance in pre- 
 sei^ing European order, and although extending 
 little favour to some of its principles, and doubtful 
 of its future, he abstained from all that might injure 
 it, and would willingly have contributed to its sup- 
 port; but to do so effectually, he must have dis- 
 pleased certain members of the Imperial family, the 
 society of Vienna, and the Emperor Nicholas, whose 
 hostility towards King Louis-Philippe, though far 
 from bold, was declared and haughty. M. de Met- 
 ternich was indisposed to enter into any of these 
 conflicts, or to encounter these hazards. Hence
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 23 
 
 arose, in his policy towards the French government, 
 those hesitations, obscurities, and reserves, which fre- 
 quently rendered his impartiality fruitless, and his 
 wisdom of less avail than it ought to have proved if 
 he had ventured more to establish its influence. 
 
 M. de Sainte Aulaire, whom the Duke de Broglie 
 despatched as ambassador to Vienna a few months 
 after the formation of the cabinet, was eminently 
 adapted to that mission. Nobly liberal, dignified 
 and concihating, polished and brave, zealous in his 
 duty but not officiously meddling, and a man of the 
 world without unbecoming worldly complaisance, 
 he commanded an elevated reception in the circles of 
 Vienna, and established himself mth Prince Metter- 
 nich on the footing of easy frankness, as a man who 
 had nothing to conceal and required only his due. 
 It would have been useless to have instructed M. de 
 Sainte Aulaire to persuade Prince Metternich to any 
 important resolution or difficult effort to which he 
 was not spontaneously inclined; no one exercised 
 such influence over the Chancellor of Austria; but 
 M. de Sainte Aulaire maintained friendly and con- 
 fiding relations with hun which sufficed for the 
 regular course of affairs, and prevented any com- 
 plication or misunderstanding betwen the two go- 
 vernments. 
 
 But it was above all the Emperor Nicholas who 
 weighed like a night-mare on Prince Metternich, and 
 often prevented him from regulating his conduct by 
 his own judgment. Determined to maintain, under 
 
 any circumstances, the union of the three Northern 
 
 * 
 
 c 4
 
 24 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 Powers, M. de Metternich, with this idea, consented 
 in the West as m the East to more sacrifices than 
 were necessary, and the Emperor Nicholas took ad- 
 vantage, for the promotion of his own personal views 
 and passions, of the anxious prudence of the Austrian 
 Chancellor. Perhaps no sovereign has ever exercised 
 in his own states and in Europe such extensive in- 
 fluence while doing so little to acquire it and turning 
 it to such an unimportant account. The Emperor 
 Nicholas was neither a great soldier, an enlightened 
 politician, an expanded spirit, nor even a lofty am- 
 bitionist. He neither increased his territories nor ad- 
 vanced his people materially in prosperity, in civilisa- 
 tion, in knowledge, in power, and m European credit. 
 Nevertheless, he reigned internally with vigour, and 
 externally with renown. He had within himself the 
 instincts and before the world all the actual prestiges 
 of power; an imposing person, distance, the innnen- 
 sity of his empire, the number of his subjects, their 
 devoted discipline, and their silent submission. On 
 two or three serious occasions when his physical qua- 
 lities had been called into play, he showed presence of 
 mind, courage, and the exercise of an eftective ascend- 
 ency. Subsequently, he avoided rather than courted 
 trials, and feared to compromise more than he desired 
 to exhibit himself. He was a hard and haughty, 
 but a prudent despot, and a great royal actor, with 
 more taste for theatrical effects than for the events 
 and emotions of the drama. Fortune had miracu- 
 lously assisted him. On ascending the throne he 
 found Russia great and Europe restored to order, but
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 25 
 
 still fatigued. He profited by the brilliant successes 
 of the Emperor Alexander his brother for the glory 
 and security of his empire, and neither his people nor 
 his allies required much from him. Within, his 
 labours of reform were confined to sincere efforts for 
 the introduction of more probity in general adminis- 
 tration; without, a haughty non-interference sufficed 
 to maintain his influence. In the West, events gave 
 him no opportunity for action; in the East, his first 
 blows against Turkey had succeeded without en- 
 gaging him too deeply. In the midst of this pros- 
 perous and easy position, the revolution of July 
 shocked his pride as a monarch, interfered with his 
 schemes for the future, and disturbed him as to his 
 own repose. He voAved against it an intense hatred, 
 but without daring to proclaim it openly, or to ac- 
 knowledge himself the adversary of the event that he 
 detested. And to gratify his passion without com- 
 promising his policy, he affected to separate King 
 Louis-Philippe from France, cajoling the French 
 nation after as before 1830, while nourishing enmity 
 against its new head. The attitude was unworthy of 
 such a powerfiil prince, and strangely inconsistent 
 in a despot; for it is the usual care as well as the 
 necessity of absolute power to confound closely the 
 sovereign and the people, and to look upon the 
 monarch as the representative, and in some measure 
 as the incarnation of the millions who live under his 
 rule. Of a superficial mind, notwithstanding his 
 pompous severity, the Emperor Nicholas forgot this 
 vital maxim of his own system of government, and
 
 26 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 was unconscious how puerile it was to persist in 
 looking upon Louis-Philippe as unlike other kings, 
 while at the same time bowing before the revolution 
 which had placed him on the throne. 
 
 His obstinacy, besides, was not always as intract- 
 able as it wished to appear, and when likely to pro- 
 duce any serious inconvenience, he knew how to 
 relax it. After 1830, it was his habit, when he 
 received the French ambassador, to treat him with 
 personal deference, and to discourse with him on the 
 affairs of the two countries without naming the 
 King. In January 1833, the Duke de Broglie, when 
 appointing Marshal Maison to the embassy at St. 
 Petersburg, instructed him not to acknowledge such 
 an attitude ; and after adding to his official orders ^, 
 already clearly defined, certain verbal instructions 
 even more precise, he requested an interview with 
 M. Pozzo di Borgo, and stated that he considered it 
 his duty to apprise him that if, while overwhelming 
 the new envoy with undivided attention, the Em- 
 peror abstained from mentioning the King, the 
 Marshal was commissioned to quit St. Petersburg 
 within eight days, at the same time assigning a pre- 
 text, and that the most transparent would be con- 
 sidered the best. The Marshal was also desired to 
 confirm this confidential communication made to 
 Count Pozzo, who failed not to write on the subject 
 to his Court. The Emperor Nicholas had no desire 
 to embroil himself with France for the pleasure of 
 persisting in a gross breach of politeness. At the 
 
 1 See Historic Documcuts, No. I.
 
 EXTERNAL rOLICY. 27 
 
 first diplomatic reception, he hastened to meet the 
 ambassador; took him by the hand, inquired cor- 
 dially after the King's health, and on this point, at 
 least, conventional proprieties were restored between 
 the two courts. 
 
 About three years later, and in a private matter, 
 the personal feeling of the Emperor Nicholas towards 
 King Louis-Philippe and his family, manifested 
 themselves with a mixture of calculated reserve, 
 conceited susceptibility, indirect insinuations and 
 violence, which passed from the character of the man 
 into the policy of the sovereign. Towards the end of 
 the summer of 1835, M. de Barante left the Sardi- 
 nian embassy to succeed to that of Russia. At that 
 epoch, there was no particular negotiation pending 
 between the two governments, no special question to 
 arrange. The attitude and language of the new 
 ambassador, comprised the principal and almost the 
 sole object of his instructions. The future marriage 
 of the Duke of Orleans was then beginning to be 
 discussed. Before leaving Paris for his post, M. de 
 Barante requested the Duke de Broglie to inform 
 him as to what he was to do or say, in case, by any 
 accident, the possibility of a union between the Duke 
 of Orleans and one of the Grand Duchesses, daugh- 
 ters of the Emperor Nicholas, should be named to 
 him. " I know," he said, " that the Emperor is at 
 this moment extremely ill-disposed towards the King ; 
 but Russian policy is subject to sudden revulsions, 
 and the Emperor's character partakes of the pecu- 
 liarity. How am I to act under this possible con-
 
 28 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 tingency?" "The King," replied the Duke de 
 Broglie, " looks upon the marriage of his children as 
 entirely a family interest, unconnected with politics. 
 Ask him his intentions." The King told M. de 
 Barante explicitly, that he by no means desired a 
 Russian alliance for his son. In alluding to the 
 little taste he had for such a connection, some en- 
 couraging expressions had lately reached him, holding 
 out the prospect of a marriage between the Duke of 
 Orleans and an Archduchess of Austria. M. de 
 Barante received the King's answer as definitive, and 
 thencefoi'ward regulated his conduct on that point 
 accordingly. 
 
 A few days after this conversation, and on the eve 
 of his departure for St. Petersburg, he received in- 
 structions from the Duke de Broglie, to pause at 
 Berlin, and to ascertain, in conjunction mth M. 
 Bresson, whether, in the event of the Dukes of Or- 
 leans and Nemours paying a visit to that capital, 
 they would meet from the King of Prussia and his 
 family a cordial reception. This was not a matter 
 on which to found an ofiicial question. It was a 
 subject for guarded conversation, and not for a 
 written overture. M. Bresson was desired to ask a 
 temporary leave of absence, and to communicate the 
 result in Paris. An assurance speedily arrived, that 
 the Princes would be eagerly welcomed in Berlin, 
 and that the King was prepared to receive them with 
 paternal regard. And as the confidential under- 
 standing between Prussia and Austria was such, 
 that in similar matters the tAVo courts invariably
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 29 
 
 acted in concert, the French government looked 
 upon it as certain that the Princes would, mtli the 
 exception of royal cordiality, be hailed with the same 
 unanimity in Vienna as in Berlin. When, some 
 months later, the projected journeys were carried 
 out with complete success, much conversation arose 
 on the subject in St. Petersburg. It was asked if 
 the Princes would also visit Russia, and some 
 astonishment was expressed that they had not done 
 so. " They would have been heartily welcomed," 
 said the Emperor Nicholas ; and this observation was 
 carried to M. de Barante, towards whom the Emperor 
 had never exhibited the slightest shade of ill humour. 
 He even spoke with him in most favourable terms of 
 the position of France and of the King's govern- 
 ment, very contrary to his usual practice, although 
 on this subject he invariably abstained from any 
 expression of critical censure. A sentuuent very 
 opposite to dissatisfaction soon exhibited itself in- 
 directly. A person of high consideration at the 
 court of St. Petersburg, one of the ladies of honour 
 and an intimate friend of the Empress, the Baroness 
 Frederyks, spoke one day mth Madame de Barante, 
 with whom she was on confidential and familiar terms, 
 of the possibility of a marriage between the Duke of 
 Orleans and the Grand Duchess Maria. M. de 
 Barante attached little importance to the words of 
 Madame Frederyks ; he rather avoided than sought 
 any conversation with her on the subject. He knew 
 the views of King Louis-Philippe, and feeling con- 
 vinced at the same time that the Emperor Nicholas
 
 30 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 had no sincere desire for such an alliance, he cared little 
 to ascertain if these words were merely a woman's 
 fancy, or whether Madame Frederyks had been 
 charged to feel the ground at all hazards. 
 
 Nevertheless, it occurred to him that the Grand 
 Duchess Maria often spoke of the Duke of Orleans; 
 that she inquired as to his character, his disj^osition, 
 and personal endo^vments ; and had expressed a wish 
 to see his portrait. At a ball where M. de Barante 
 found himself seated at sujDper at a small table near 
 the Empress, the Grand Duchess being also present, 
 the conversation turned upon the Duke of Orleans, 
 and many questions were put to him with flattering 
 curiosity. Shortly after, M. de Barante himself gave 
 a ball, at which the Emperor and Empress did him 
 the honour of attending. He also asked permission 
 to invite the Grand Duchess Maria, and the invitation 
 had been accepted; but she did not come, and the 
 Emj)eror took the trouble of apologising for her 
 absence, by assuring the ambassador, even with some 
 detail, that it arose from indisposition. A few days 
 later, at another court assemljly, the Grand Duchess 
 mentioned to M. de Barante the disappointment she 
 had felt at not being at the Embassy; " I wept for it," 
 she said, " and I walked in the morning before your 
 windows." 
 
 These doubtful and inconsistent demonstrations 
 induced M. de Barante to think that the Emperor 
 Nicholas had no idea of bestowing his daughter on the 
 Duke of Orleans, and he therefore maintained the re- 
 serve which King Louis-Philippe had prescribed to
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 31 
 
 him. After a certain time, the marriage of the Duke 
 with the Princess Helena of ]\Iecklenburgh began to 
 be spoken of, and M. de Barante ascertained that the 
 Emperor Nicholas expressed himself very warmly 
 against this project. He wished, it was said, to em- 
 ploy all his influence to prevent its accomplishment, 
 and with that view, availed himself of his habitual 
 correspondence with Prince Charles of Mecklenburgh- 
 Strelitz, a general officer in the Prussian service, and 
 in some credit at the court of Berlin. When it be- 
 came known at St. Petersburg that the King of 
 Prussia strenuously advocated a plan which proceeded 
 from himself, the Emperor Nicholas indulged in a 
 strange fit of passion. He acted publicly a scene 
 with Baron de Boden, the envoy of the Duke of Meck- 
 lenburgh-Schwerin in Russia, and spoke in coarse 
 terms of the part the King of Prussia had taken 
 in forwarding the marriage. At a ball given 
 about this time, at which the Emperor was pre- 
 sent, he addressed not a single word to the Ambas- 
 sador of France; a marked exception to his usual 
 custom, and the more significant, as the ministers of 
 Austria and England held on that evening their 
 ordinary conversation with him. This fit of ill- 
 humour soon subsided; it produced no change in the 
 official relations of M. de Barante with the Count de 
 Nesselrode, who carefully avoided mixing himself up 
 with the sallies of his master ; and in a short time 
 nothing more was said at St. Petersburg of the mar- 
 riase of the Duke of Orleans. 
 
 In 1838, M. de Barante came on leave to Paris,
 
 32 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 and the Duke of Orleans, then happily married, re- 
 quested him to relate all that had passed at St. 
 Petersburg on the subject of his espousals. Being 
 informed of the incidents I have now related, the 
 Prince agreed with the ambassador in thmking that the 
 Emperor Nicholas never had any idea of bestowing 
 his daughter on him. While an attempt was making to 
 impress the contrary on M. de Barante, there was also 
 a desire to flatter the Duke himself by encouraging 
 such a prospect. A confidential female intmiate 
 repeated to hun in Paris what Madame Fredeiyks had 
 said to Madame de Barante in St. Petersburg, and 
 endeavoured to dissuade him from any other alliance. 
 The Prince remained equally incredulous with the 
 ambassador. 
 
 They were both right. The Emperor Nicholas had 
 never sincerely contemplated even in thought a mar- 
 riage so contrary to his prejudices. If the Grand 
 Duchess Maria had met Avith an oj^portunity of seeing 
 the Duke of Orleans ; if he had pleased her, and she 
 herself had ardently desired the union, very possibly 
 the Emperor might have yielded to the wishes of his 
 daughter. Harsh in his government, he had a ten- 
 derly paternal heart towards his family; and more- 
 over, in questions of marnage was strongly inclined to 
 hold it as a point of duty to allow much weight to the 
 personal tastes and inclinations of his children. But 
 no such motives pressed on him in 1836, and when the 
 visit of the French princes to Gennany suggested the 
 idea in his immediate circle, the Emperor Nicholas 
 had recently adopted towards King Louis-Philippe
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 33 
 
 manifestations and j)roceedings calculated to estrange 
 him still more from such a connection. 
 
 After t]ie taking of Antwerp, and in presence of that 
 brilliant French solution of the Belgic question, the 
 discontent of the three northern cabinets, although 
 restrained, was profound. It was they who had to 
 submit successively to the most important and bit- 
 terest concessions, at the same time political and 
 domestic, — concessions equally of principle and rela- 
 tionship. The King of Prussia and the Emperor 
 had been compelled to abandon, in the King of Hol- 
 land, — the one his brother-in-law, the other the 
 brother-m-law of his sister. The Emperor Nicholas 
 had even gone so far as to send on an extraordinary 
 mission to the Hague, his chief confidant Count Orloff, 
 to announce to King William his secession, and to 
 overcome his obstinate resistance to the wishes of 
 Europe. Such sacrifices, even where sincerely carried 
 out, leave stinging wounds in the hearts of the coldest 
 l^oliticians. Austria, Prussia, and Kussia, beheld 
 moreover the perfect accordance and united action of 
 France and England, strengthen and extend from 
 day to day. This was not merely an accidental agree- 
 ment of the two governments upon special questions ; 
 it was, in fact, a general sympathy of ideas and ten- 
 dencies openly proclaimed between the countries 
 despite their ancient hostility; a sympathy which, 
 throughout all Europe inspired the advocates of poli' 
 tical reform, and the fabricators of revolutions with 
 the allurements and hopes of success. From self-love 
 and apprehension, the three northern powers felt the 
 
 VOL. IV. D
 
 34 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 desire and necessity of ostensibly opposing combined 
 action to action and force to force, of mutually sup- 
 porting each other in the face of a doubtful future, 
 and of taking revenge, in case the opportunity should 
 present itself, for the checks to which they had re- 
 cently submitted. 
 
 Another more immediate and pressing cause urged 
 them to this course. The revolutionarj'- attempts 
 excited in Italy, Poland, and Germany by the crisis 
 of 1830 had failed, but conspiracies still existed, 
 ardently fomented by the Italian, Polish, and German 
 refugees, who had found free shelter in France, 
 England, Belgium, and Switzerland. I have already 
 stated my opinion on the right of asylum, its legi- 
 timacy and political utility, and also of the duties 
 thereto appertaining, as well on the part of the pro- 
 tecting governments as on that of the exiles them- 
 selves.' The question is as simple and clear in 
 principle as delicate and difficult in application; but 
 practical obstacles have too often caused the empire of 
 the principle and the necessity of respecting it to be 
 forgotten. Political refugees, however natural and 
 patriotic their enterprise may have been, have evi- 
 dently no right to prosecute, from the bosom of the 
 asylum they have obtained, and to the danger of the 
 state that has admitted them, their war against the 
 government of their o"svn country ; and the power that 
 shelters them, whatever its sympathy may be, is 
 ob\^ously called on to restrain their attacks against 
 the authorities with which it lives in peace itself. This 
 
 * See vol. ii. chap. ii. pp. 85, 90.
 
 EXTEKNAL TOLICY. 35 
 
 course is imperatively commanded by the public law 
 which constitutes the inherent morality and loyalty of 
 nations. This law forbids not the kind reception of 
 exiles, nor the relief afforded to them in misfortune ; 
 neither does it interdict respect for natural affection, 
 nor the maintenance of the private ties of which these 
 exiles may be the object. When Count Pozzo di 
 Borgo complained that the Duchess de Broglie had 
 received in friendly intercourse at her house Prince 
 Adam Czartoriski, that noble chief of the Polish 
 emigrants, he was in the wrong, and the Duchess 
 was justified in saying with animated pride, " Prince 
 Czartoriski has long been my mother's and my own 
 personal friend: I shall not exclude him from my 
 drawing-room because my husband has the honour to 
 represent France and her king." Generous senti- 
 ments, under such circumstances, do not justify any 
 defalcation from political duties, neither are they 
 condemned to obliterate themselves in the presence 
 of harsh or overweening exigencies; and the govern- 
 ments which exclaim against the underhand practices 
 of refugees, are also bound to consider the dignity as 
 well as the legal position of the power it calls upon to 
 repress them. On both sides there are many con- 
 siderations to be respected, many restraints to be 
 observed, many embarrassing points to be allowed 
 for. But all these being admitted, the right of re- 
 monstrance remains entire with the one party, and 
 the duty of repression with the other; a duty of 
 political honesty as well as of prudence, the strict ob- 
 servance of which is equally essential to the honour of 
 
 D 2
 
 36 EXTERNAL TOLICY. 
 
 governments and the safety of states, and ■which can- 
 not be disregarded but through deplorable weakness 
 or inexcusable arrogance. In spite of our sincere 
 efforts to acquit ourselves of our duty on this point 
 to the different governments of Europe, from hence 
 arose, between 1832 and 1831), in all our dealings 
 with them, a source of complications incessantly re- 
 newing, and one of the principal causes which in- 
 duced the three Northern Powers to adopt combined 
 demonstrations and measures tending to compromise 
 the pacific relations they desired to maintain, and to 
 defeat the redress of the injuries of which they com- 
 plained. 
 
 At the beginning of April 1833, a revolutionary 
 movement exploded at Frankfort; one of those oscil- 
 lations so frequent in our days, serious from the ideas 
 and sentiments which excite them, but frivolous from 
 the thoughtlessness and incapacity of their authors. 
 At the same moment a similar conspiracy was dis- 
 covered at Turin. Both were j^romptly repressed. 
 But the Germanic Diet set on foot an extensive in- 
 quest to ascertain their sources, ramifications, and 
 objects; and, as might have been easily foreseen, the 
 inquiry from its first steps encountered and brought 
 to light the plots and aggressions of the refugees. 
 While pursuing its course, we learned that on the 14th 
 of August, the Emperor of Austria and the King of 
 Prussia, accompanied by their ministers, Prince Met- 
 ternich and M. Ancillon, had held an interview at the 
 castle of Theresienstadt, near Tijplitz. Three months 
 later, the King of Prussia and the Emperor of Russia
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 37 
 
 again met at Schwedt on the Oder, and a few days 
 subsequently the Emperor Nicholas and the Emperor 
 of Austria, also accompanied by their ministers for 
 Foreign AiFairs, conferred personally at MiinchengraBtz, 
 a small to\vn in Bohemia, whither the Prince Royal of 
 Prussia had previously repaired. The result of these 
 repeated meetings soon manifested itself. During the 
 first days of November, 1833, Baron de Hugel, charge 
 d'afikires of Austria, in the absence of Count Appony, 
 Baron de Werther, in the name of Prussia, and Count 
 Pozzo di Borgo, on the part of Russia, called succes- 
 sively upon the Duke de Broglie, and communicated 
 to him three despatches from their courts, all winding 
 up by declaring in the same terms, that " If France, 
 who had kno^wn so well how to defend herself from 
 the attempts of disturbers, did not henceforward 
 equally defeat the machinations which in her ter- 
 ritory they were contriving against foreign states, 
 in some of these latter, internal commotions might 
 arise which would compel them to appeal to the 
 assistance of their allies ; that this aid would not be 
 refused to them, and that every attempt to oppose it 
 would be considered by the three cabinets of Vienna, 
 St. Petersburg, and Berlin, as an act of hostility 
 directed against each." 
 
 In itself, this remonstrance contained nothing be- 
 yond what was natural and conformable to the law of 
 nations and the exigencies of the moment, but the 
 concert which had led to it, the unifonnity and per- 
 emptory tone of the despatches, impressed too palpably 
 on the act of the three courts the character of an 
 
 D 3 
 
 3 7 .i 4 Q 
 
 'i i ^ ■i .:i
 
 38 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 attempt at intimidation, not to confine us exclusively 
 to a consideration of its principle and motives. The 
 cabinets which had adopted the resolution, and the 
 diplomatic agents mstructed to communicate it to the 
 French mmistry, so thoroughly understood its bear- 
 ing, that while acquittmg themselves of their mission, 
 the most moderate endeavoured to extenuate it. The 
 Austrian despatch lavished encomiums on the ability 
 and energy of the Kmg's government. The Prussian 
 document, filled with expressions of personal esteem 
 and alFection, rendered ample justice to the efibrts the 
 Kmg had already made to restraia the refugees ; and 
 Count Pozzo di Borgo, perhaps little satisfied with the 
 details of the Russian missive, reframed from statmg it 
 at full length to the Duke de Broglie, and confined him- 
 self to reading the conclusion. While varying, according 
 to these difi'erent attitudes, his reception and language 
 in reply, the Duke de Broglie becomingly repulsed 
 the attempt at mtimidation, and resolutely mamtained, 
 for all cases of European complication or interven- 
 tion which the future might present, full liberty of 
 action and the free exercise of the declared policy of 
 France. When this answer was conveyed to Prince 
 Metternich, he endeavoured only to understand it in 
 part, and to persuade himself that Piedmont was not 
 one of the states in which France would suffer no 
 foreign intervention without interposing herself; but 
 M. de Sainte Aulaire, by a prompt and frank retort, 
 prevented him from assuming the air of decei\dng 
 himself on that point. M. de Metternich submitted. 
 At Berlin, and even at St. Petersburg, the firm reply
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 39 
 
 of the Duke de Broglie entailed no remark ; and the 
 whole affair had no other result than that of exhibit- 
 ing with some display the concerted action of the 
 three courts, and the laborious efforts of the Emperor 
 Nicholas to coerce liis allies. It revealed at the same 
 tune their internal disagreements, and little inclination 
 to push their demonstrations to extremity. There 
 are few worse politicians than those who possess minds 
 more haughty than expanded, more impassioned than 
 reflecting ; who seek the momentary gratification of 
 their prejudices far more than the actual and perma- 
 nent accomplishment of their designs. 
 
 Independently of Western revolutions, the Emperor 
 Nicholas, a few months after the conferences of The- 
 reseinstadt, Schwedt, and Munchengrtetz, discovered in 
 the East a new subject of irritation agamst the 
 government of Kmg Louis-Philippe. The struggle 
 between the Ottoman Porte and the Pacha of Egypt 
 had commenced. Mehemet Ali subdued Syria; his 
 son Ibrahim, victorious at Konieh, overran Asia Minor 
 as a conqueror, occupied Smyrna, and menaced 
 Constantinople. The great problem which weighs, 
 and in aU probability wiU long continue to weigh 
 upon Europe, the Eastern question, was approaching 
 a most violent crisis. I shall presently describe the 
 conflagration which was then so near being lighted 
 up; at present I confine myself to its first glim- 
 mermgs. 
 
 There can be no doubt that Mehemet Ali aspired 
 to throw off the yoke of the Sultan, and to establish 
 an independent sovereignty for himself. It was in 
 
 D 4
 
 40 EXTERNAL POLICl'. 
 
 vain that he multiplied his protestations of fidelity, 
 and declared to M. de Bois-le-Comte, who in the 
 spring of 1833 was charged by the Duke de Broglie 
 with a commission to the East, — "I am ready at 
 all times to proclaim, in face of the world, that I 
 shall never seek a quarrel with the Sultan provided 
 he seeks none Avith me, and that I will live in peace 
 and obedience. But let the great European Powers 
 guarantee, both for the Porte and for myself, that 
 we shall never mutually disturb by any aggression 
 the peace they may re-establish between us." M. de 
 Bois-le-Comte observed to the Pacha that the Sultan 
 was his sovereign, and that it would be difficult for 
 the Powers to enter into any guarantee which should 
 place them on an equality. " Do you know why I 
 am not independent?" quickly retorted Mehemet Ali. 
 "It is from respect for the PoAvers. Do you believe 
 that but for the deference I pay to their intentions, 
 I would continue in the position of a subject? Well; 
 the regard I have had for your counsels neither the 
 Greeks nor Belgians have entertained, and you have 
 rewarded them by securing their independence ; but 
 you punish me by refusing to guarantee my safety." 
 Leaving then the view of his own interest, " Within 
 a year," he said, with an expression full of mystery 
 and gravity, " within a year war will burst forth in 
 Europe ; I have certain information of this. United 
 to England, you will have to combat Russia, Austria, 
 and the States of the Continent, llussia predomi- 
 nates at Constantinople ; do you not then see the 
 advantage of employing Mehemet Ali, and of using
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 41 
 
 liim to oppose and destroy a hostile influence ? Think 
 well of this ; it may suit you to let me seize the dis- 
 trict of Adana : this would give strength to you and 
 to me." M. de Bois-le-Comte then affirmed that there 
 would be no war; Europe had resolved to remain at 
 peace. Mehemet Ali seemed to understand this, 
 and hesitated; but some days after, speaking fami- 
 liarly with the French envoy, he said to him, " Mr. 
 Campbell, the English political agent, is going to 
 present to me to-morrow, Mr. Turnbull, Her Britannic 
 Majesty's consul. When will you also give to your 
 consul, M. Mimaut, a political character? Shall I 
 tell you what the result will be ? You not only allow 
 yourselves to be forestalled by England, but you will 
 also be so by Austria and Russia. Yes, by Russia 
 herself. Do not believe that I stand badly with her; 
 on the contrary, we are on excellent terms. The 
 Austrian agent, M. Prokesch, who seems so closely 
 united with the English and with you, has taken 
 upon himself to maintam friendly relations between 
 Russia and me." Sometimes, under an appearance 
 of forgetting politics altogether, the Pacha related 
 to M. de Bois-le-Comte with complete unreserve the 
 vicissitudes of his life, and the difficulties he had to 
 overcome before reaching his present eminence. 
 " One of the greatest," he said, " was the vice of my 
 education. I was fifty, and had governed Egypt for 
 ten years before I learned to read." " What motive 
 induced your Highness to submit to such a painful 
 labour? Mahomet established a religion, and laid 
 the foundations of one of the greatest empires in the
 
 42 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 world, without knoAving how to read." "True; but 
 the necessity of being able to read impressed itself on 
 me more and more. Until I could do so, I arranged 
 in my head, as in a magazine, all that I saw and 
 heard; sometimes the impression of objects became 
 weak, but in moments of danger, or when inflamed 
 by passion, all came back upon my mind clear and 
 lucid ; I found out, nevertheless, that my memory 
 declined. I then determined to strengthen it by 
 reading. Every one I saw, I desired to take a book 
 and read with me. By dint of this process, I learned 
 to read myself, and very quickly. Since then, I 
 have perused many books; latterly, a large volume 
 of geography sent to me from Constantinople. Above 
 all, I have studied works on military and political 
 science. I also read your journals. In addition, I 
 have looked over books of history, and I feel con- 
 vinced that no one "svith such weak means has 
 acliieved the great deeds that I have accomplished. 
 I have still much to do. I have already advanced 
 my country beyond Turkey, Greece, and particularly 
 beyond Persia. But I began too late. I doubt 
 whether I shall have time to finish. At all events 
 I wish to leave matters to my son in as good a state 
 as I possibly can." He concluded by returning to 
 his fixed idea, the necessity for the Porte ceding to 
 him the district of Adana, or that the Powers should 
 guarantee to him the security of his possessions. " I 
 consider myself," he added, " as a man placed in 
 presence of an enemy who holds the sword over his 
 head; I have a shield before me, you call upon me
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 43 
 
 « 
 
 to abandon this shield; you are my friends and 
 I give it up to you, because I have full confidence 
 that you mean to provide me with another defence. 
 Without that, it would be to destroy me." 
 
 When he wished to ingratiate himself with the 
 powers whom he knew to be sincere friends of the 
 Porte, — and probably with sincerity on his o'svn part, 
 for he sometimes doubted his fortune if separated 
 from the general lot of the Ottoman empire, — he sjDoke 
 of a desii'e to end his days after the peace, at Con- 
 stantmople, and to devote himself heart and soul to 
 the raising and reanimation of that crumblmg mon- 
 archy. In this hypothesis, even European policy 
 paid homage to the superiority of his views and 
 character. " Assuredly," said M. Prokesch to M. de 
 Bois-le-Comte, " if, as by a sudden theatrical effect, 
 Mehemet Ali could be placed on the throne of Con- 
 stantinople, Austria, and all the other Powers who 
 suffer from the weakness of that government, would 
 gladly see hun there. Mehemet Ali is a reformer; 
 he replaces old dying mstitutions by improved new 
 ones. The Sultan Mahmoud is a revolutionist ; he 
 destroys without substitution." 
 
 Whatever turn his ambition might take, whether as 
 an enemy or a protector, such a man was insupport- 
 able to the Sultan and his advisers. One of the most 
 influential members of the divan, Khosrew Pacha, 
 hated him with an old and intense antipathy. Whe- 
 ther it was peace or war with Mehemet Ali, either 
 in concession or denial, the Porte incessantly medi- 
 tated his ruin; and this bitter hostility, this un-
 
 44 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 remitting eifort to destroy him, as constantly furnished 
 the viceroy of ^gypt with real motives and plausible 
 pretexts for engagmg in the struggle towards which 
 his ambition hnpelled him. " What would you have 
 had me do ? " he said, in May 1833, to M. de Bois-le- 
 Comte, who complamed of his attack upon the Pacha 
 of St. Jean d'Acre, and the war thereby excited; "I 
 held in my hands undeniable proofs that the Porte, 
 resolved on my destruction, was preparmg to fall on 
 me within a year. I have taken the initiative. I 
 was placed between two abysses, and I preferred 
 descendmg mto the one to bemg thrown mto the 
 other." 
 
 In presence of the Eastern question thus abruptly 
 laid doA\Ti, and surrounded by great powers all eager 
 to take a share in it with very opposite feelings, the 
 position of France was one of peculiar difficulty. 
 England and Austria had a simple and fixed idea; 
 they were anxious only to support the Ottoman 
 empu'e, and to defend it agamst its enemies. Russia 
 also held but one view, less simple, though equally 
 exclusive and determined. She mshed to mamtain 
 without strengthening the Turkish dominion, and to 
 control while protecting it. Prussia, little interested 
 in the matter, mclined habitually towards Austria 
 and England while humouring Russia. The policy 
 of France was complicated and alternative. She 
 wished at the same time to assist the Sultan and 
 the Pacha, to support the Ottoman empire, and to 
 strengthen Egypt. The Porte found itself engaged
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 45 
 
 with two real allies, a hypocritical protector, and a 
 friend with a divided heart. 
 
 Arguments m some points substantial, in others 
 specious, were not wanting to justify this double 
 policy of France. The importance of Egypt in the 
 Mediterranean has been set forward, with the assist- 
 ance France might derive from that quarter in case 
 of a contest either with England or Russia ; and, 
 above all, the necessity, in the precarious state of the 
 East, that Egypt should neither remain in impotent 
 hands, nor pass into those of enemies. I shall balance 
 the value of these reasons when I treat of the great 
 debates in which they were introduced. They were 
 opmions formed after the blow was struck, rather 
 than determining causes before the event. To speak 
 truly, the policy of France on this question derived 
 its source from our brilliant expedition to Egypt in 
 1798; from the renown of our generals, soldiers, and 
 scholars; from the reminiscences and impressions of 
 their achievements and labours; from mipulses of 
 imagmation, and not from calculations of safety or 
 political balance. A lively interest attaches itself to 
 the theatre of that national and singular glory. Egypt 
 conquered by a French army and described by a 
 French mstitute, had become a popular fantasy in 
 France; we associated ourselves with its destmies; 
 and its new master, equally glorious and remarkable, 
 who governed with so much reputation while courting 
 our favour, became in our estimation a natural ally, 
 whom we supported from inclination and enthusiasm 
 rather than from reflection and motives of interest.
 
 46 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 The diflSiciilties of this position manifested them- 
 selves from the beginning. Three French agents inter- 
 posed, in 1833, in the struggle between the Porte and 
 Eg}^jt. At the close of 1832 General Guilleminot, 
 recalled in 1831, had not yet been replaced as am- 
 bassador at Constantinople. M. de Varemies, first 
 secretary to the embassy, represented France in that 
 quarter when the Syrian war broke out. After the 
 battle of Konieh, he exerted himself strenuously to 
 induce the Porte to consent to the concessions that 
 Mehemet Ali demanded. Admiral Roussin, appointed 
 ambassador at the commencement of January 1833, 
 arrived at Constantinople on the 17th of February, 
 and three days afterwards a Russian fleet applied for 
 by the Sultan on the 21st of January, entered the 
 Bosj^horus to protect hun against his ambitious vassal. 
 Admiral Roussin demanded from the Divan its im- 
 mediate withdrawal, pledging hunself to obtain the 
 consent of Mehemet Ali to the conditions which the 
 Porte had proposed to him in answer to his demands ; 
 and on the promise of the Sultan that on these terms 
 the Russians should effectually retire, the admiral 
 wrote as follows to the Pacha on the 22nd of Fe- 
 bruary : "To persist in the pretensions you have set 
 forward would be to call down disastrous consequences 
 on your head, which will, I have no doubt, awaken 
 your fears. France will keep the engagement she has 
 contracted ; she possesses the means, and I answer for 
 her inclmation. It only remains for me to hope that 
 you will not force us to the cruel necessity of attack- 
 ing a Power partly created by ourselves, and of
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 47 
 
 tarnishing a glory of which I am the sincere admirer." 
 The Pacha haughtily refused to yield ; intrigues and 
 negotiations continued ; and when, six months later, 
 M. de Bois-le-Comte was despatched to the East 
 without any official authority, merely to watch the 
 progress of events and to give advice, he found Me- 
 hemet Ali still so irritated at the menacing summons 
 of Admiral Roussin, that he was unable to persuade 
 him to answer himself a second letter that the admiral 
 had addressed to him. " What do you wish me to 
 write to the ambassador?" said the Pacha; " I cannot 
 say my dear friend^ for I should speak falsely ; neither 
 can I evince my resentment, for in that case I should 
 offend your government. France has an accredited 
 agent here ; your consul is the organ of her relations 
 with me, and on my part he is the medium of my com- 
 munications with her. She herself estabhshed this 
 rule, to which I have faithfully conformed. When 
 the ambassador at Constantinople is changed, I am 
 not told of it, and I have nothing to do with him. 
 As to my relations with the Sultan, all conventiona- 
 lities require that I should carry them out alone and 
 without intermediary." Thus France, according to 
 the urgency of the moment, mclmed alternately to 
 either scale of the balance, endeavouring to act as a 
 counterpoise between her two friends, and to keep 
 her rivals at a distance. 
 
 Meanwhile Russia, on the one hand, and Mehemet 
 Ali on the other, pursued their work, Avhich was little 
 complicated and less sincere. On learning the re- 
 fusal of Mehemet Ali to satisfy himself with the
 
 48 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 offer of the Porte, the Emperor Nicholas once more 
 placed his fleet and army at the disposal of the Sul- 
 tan, and Mehemet Ali lavished at Constantinople his 
 ordinary means of persuasion, to induce the Porte 
 to cede to him, not only Syria, but, in addition, the 
 district of Adana, — in fact, the gate of Asia Minor, 
 the last object of dispute. After many secret con- 
 ferences and confused fluctuations, both parties suc- 
 ceeded in their efforts. On the 5th of April, a Russian 
 fleet, casting anchor in the Bosphorus, disembarked 
 five thousand soldiers on the Asiatic coast, while a 
 Russian division marched towards the Danube, and 
 on the 16th of May, a hundred discharges of artillery 
 announced at Alexandria that a firman of the 5th 
 ceded to the Pacha the district of Adana, as well as 
 Syria, and that the Egyptian army had recommenced 
 its march for the evacuation of Asia Minor. The 
 arrangement, considered at that time as definitive 
 between the Porte and the Pacha, was in effect signed 
 on the 5th of May at Kutaich. Ibrahim Pacha exe- 
 cuted his retreat, and peace might be said to be 
 re-established in the East. 
 
 But it was purchased at a price that sowed discord 
 in Europe. On the 6th of May, the day following 
 that which had witnessed the promulgation of the 
 pacific firman of the Sultan, Count Orloff entered 
 Constantinople in great pomp, invested with the titles 
 of ambassador extraordinary, and commander-in-chief 
 of the Russian forces in the Ottoman empire. 
 
 He arrived at the precise moment when the Porte 
 seemed to be free from danger, to realise substantially
 
 EXTER'kAL POLICY. 49 
 
 the protection proffered by Russia, and to promise 
 that this protection should be extended under any 
 circumstances for the future. The apparent inutility 
 and unusual display of this embassy inspired the other 
 courts with well-founded mistrust. They required 
 explanations from the Porte. The Porte complained 
 of this demand as insulting, and affirmed that the 
 arrival of Count OrloiF was nothing more than an 
 explicit evidence of the perfect harmony then sub- 
 sisting between the Sultan and the Emperor of Russia. 
 Count Orloff remained more than two months at 
 Constantinople, expecting, as he said, that the Egyp- 
 tian army would entirely evacuate the Ottoman 
 states. By the end of June this evacuation was 
 completed. Ibrahim Pacha had recrossed the 
 Taurus, and on the 10th of July the Russian fleet 
 and army retired in their turn from Turkey; but 
 two days previously, on the 8 th, a treaty called the 
 treaty of Unkiar-Skelessi was signed at Constanti- 
 nople, expressing in Article 3, " That in consequence ' 
 of the sincere st desire to secure the durability, 
 maintenance, and entire independence of the Sublime 
 Porte, his Majesty the Emperor of all the Russias, 
 in case any circumstances should arise to induce the 
 Sublime Porte to require once more the moral and 
 military assistance of Russia, although there is no 
 reason whatever to anticipate such a contingency, 
 yet, should God permit it, his Majesty j^i'omises to 
 supply, by land and sea, as many forces as the two 
 contracting parties may consider necessary." And 
 in return for this promise, a secret article, annexed 
 
 VOL. IV. E
 
 50 EXTERN^VL POLICY. 
 
 to the treaty, added, " As his Majesty the Emperor 
 of all the Russias, wishmg to spare the Sublune Otto- 
 man Porte the expenses and embarrassments which 
 mioht result to her from the contribution of material 
 succour to Russia, will not require this succour 
 should circumstances impose on the Sublime Porte 
 the obligation of supplying it, — the Sublime Porte, 
 in place of the aid it is called upon to furnish 
 when required, and in compliance mth the principle 
 of reciprocity of the present treaty, is allowed to 
 limit its action in favour of the imperial court of 
 Russia to closing the Straits of the Dardanelles; 
 that is to say, to the total exclusion of all foreign 
 ships of war, under any pretext whatever." 
 
 Thus the cabinet of St. Petersburg, converting 
 into a wiitten, legal right the fact of its prepon- 
 derance at Constantinople, reduced Turkey to the 
 condition of an official client, and transformed the 
 Black Sea into a Russian lake, the entrance to which 
 this client guarded agamst the possible enemies of 
 Russia ■without any restriction unposed on the latter 
 power against issuing from thence and pouring her 
 fleets and aiinies into the Mediterranean. 
 '^ Dui'ing the course of this negotiation, and when the 
 results began to be foreseen, Admiral Roussm, a bold 
 and straightforward spirit, ahvays governed by a 
 smgle idea, was tempted to place himself directly in 
 opposition to it, and to announce to the Porte, if 
 she thus delivered herself into the hands of Russia, 
 the hostility of France. He was overruled by his 
 colleague, the English ambassador at Constantinople,
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 51 
 
 Lord Ponsonby, as intensely hostile to Russia as 
 himself, but who mingled more calculation with his 
 passion. 
 
 " I have dissuaded Admiral Roussin from opposmg 
 the signature of the Russian treaty," said he one day 
 to M. de Bois-le-Comte ; "it Avould only have pro- 
 voked a contest which we were not then m a con- 
 dition to sustam." Such was, in fact, the anger of 
 the Sultan and his ministers at the mere name of 
 Mehemet Ali, and so convmced were they that he 
 was already preparmg to recommence war, that very 
 probably nothing would have restrained them from 
 securmg against him the powerful protector who 
 offered himself. A courageous adviser attempted on 
 one occasion, in the name of the peace of Constanti- 
 nople and the dignity of the empire, to disturb the 
 Sultan's mind as to the designs of the Russians. 
 
 " What signifies the empu'e to me?" exclaimed 
 Mahmoud; " Avhat signifies Constantinople? I would 
 give both to the man who brought me the head of 
 Mehemet AH." But when the treaty of Unkiar- 
 Skelessi, thus concluded in a paroxysm of terror, 
 became public in Europe, the French and English 
 cabinets paid little attention to the alarms of the 
 Porte, but inspired it in their turn with new fears, by 
 testifymg their resentment at its cowardly submission. 
 
 They did not confine their protests to the Porte 
 alone. M. de Lagrene, representative of France at 
 St. Petersburg in the absence of Marshal Maison, 
 received orders to transmit a note to Count de 
 Nesselrode, in which the French government, after 
 
 E 2
 
 52 EXTERNAL TOLICY. 
 
 premising "that the treaty of Unkiar-Skelessi assigned 
 to the iniitual relations of the Ottoman and Russian 
 empires a new character against which the powers 
 of Europe had a right to protest," declared that, 
 " if the stipulations of that act should subsequently 
 lead to an armed intervention on the part of Russia 
 in the internal affairs of Turkey, the French govern- 
 ment would hold itself entirely free to adopt such 
 a line of conduct as circumstances might suggest, 
 acting from that moment as if the treaty in question 
 had no existence." 
 
 The English government held shnilar language at 
 Constantinople and at St. Petersburg. Neither did 
 the two cabinets confine themselves to words. They 
 materially increased their naval forces in the Medi- 
 terranean. A part of the English squadron appeared 
 before Smyrna, and even more decisive demonstra- 
 tions were spoken of. It was asked if the time had 
 not arrived to force the Dardanelles, to enter the 
 Black Sea, and to burn that Russian fleet ever ready 
 to take possession of Constantuiople under pretext ot 
 protection. The answer of the cabmet of St. Peters- 
 buro' to the notifications it received from Paris and 
 London, tended to aggravate still more the anger and 
 suspicion which these menaces inspired ; for its tone 
 was as violent as that which it repulsed. 
 
 The treaty of Unkiar-Skelessi, according to M. de 
 Nesselrode, contained nothing which exceeded the 
 rights of the contracting parties, "and his Majesty 
 the Emperor," said he in conclusion, " is determined 
 to fulfil j)uiictiliously, should occasion require, the
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 53 
 
 obligations which the treaty of the 8th of July imposes 
 on him, actmg thus as if the declaration contained in 
 the note of M. de Lasfrene had no existence." 
 
 So much irritation and excitement alarmed the pru- 
 dent guardians of the peace of Europe. The treaty of 
 Unkiar-Skelessi had greatly displeased the Prince de 
 Metternich, who felt uneasy, Avitli us, at the Russian 
 predominance in Constantinople ; but, even more dis- 
 turbed at the prospect of any serious misunder- 
 standmg between Austria and Russia, he took care to 
 conceal his discontent, and his agents were instructed 
 to blame the explosion of ours. " Why did you carry 
 your protest to St. Petersburg?" said the Austrian 
 internuncio. Baron de Stiirmer, to M. de Bois-le- 
 Comte. " At Constantinople it might have passed; 
 but at St. Petersburg it assumes the air of a menace, 
 and you have drawn upon yourselves an answer 
 which may be injurious to you and embitter mutual 
 feelings." 
 
 When this acrimony led to proceedings which visi- 
 bly threatened the peace of Europe, the Chancellor of 
 Austria availed himself of the danger to act upon the 
 Emperor Nicholas, Avho had not in reality any desire 
 for war, and to impress upon him the inconvenience 
 of the treaty of Unkiar-Skelessi, — a demonstration 
 more brilliant than useful, and which excited more 
 ano-er ag-ainst Russia than it conferred on her real 
 strength. M. de Metternich excelled in turning to 
 account the changes introduced by time into the state 
 of facts and minds, to insinuate the truths he was 
 unwilling to declare openly, and to diminish the dan- 
 
 E 3
 
 54 EXTERNAL TOLICY. 
 
 gers he dared not combat at the critical moment. 
 The conference of Miinchengraitz furnished hun with 
 a favourable opportunity for exercising this sedative 
 influenccc He extracted words from the Emperor 
 Nicholas which, Avithout abolishing the treaty of 
 Unkiar-Skelessi, disavowed its consequences, and con- 
 tained almost an engagement not to clami its appli- 
 cation nnder any possible circumstances. 
 
 This was, in fact, nothing more than a pacific de- 
 monstration placed m balance with an ambitious one. 
 In reality, situations and intentions remained the 
 same; but none of the powers who thus looked on 
 each other with jealous eyes had, to say the truth, any 
 very urgent fears, or strong inclination to push their 
 menaces to extremity. The Chancellor of Austria 
 obtamed much credit both in Paris and m London 
 for the verbal concessions of the Emperor Nicholas 
 and his own perseverance in extorting them. 
 
 The alarm subsided; the armaments diminished, 
 the vessels returned to their harbours; and with the 
 opening of the year 1834 nothmg remamed of this 
 first phase of Eastern affairs except the permanent 
 hostility of the Porte and Mehemet Ali; the diffi- 
 cult situation in which France stood pledged towards 
 them ; the clouds Avhich her declared favour for the 
 Pacha had already spread between her and England ; 
 and the increased ill-will which this stru2:<ile had ex- 
 cited in the soul of the Emperor Nicholas against 
 lung Louis-Philippe and his government. 
 
 At the moment when this question seemed to ter- 
 mmate, another sprang up, destined to become, if not
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. bO 
 
 for all Europe, at least for us, even more important 
 than that of the East. 
 
 Kmg Ferduiand YII. died at Madrid, and Spam 
 plunged once more into the career of revolution. 
 
 Since Ferdinand VII. had fidly acknowledged King 
 Louis-Philippe, and no longer tolerated in Spain the 
 openly hostile plots of the legitimists, we lived with 
 the Spanish government, if not in intimate, at least 
 in regular and pacific relations. 
 
 The Kmg mspired us with no confidence; the 
 violent and senseless predominance of the absolute 
 party disturbed us for Spain herself, agitated by per- 
 petual conspiracies and severities. We acted in 
 concert with England to prevent the usurped tyi'anny 
 of Don Miguel, m Portugal, from establishing and 
 aggrandizing itself by the support which the court 
 of Madrid was inclmed to give him ; but we had not 
 beyond the Pyrenees any serious or pressing French 
 interest to defend. 
 
 We paid very little attention to what was passing 
 there; our leadmg afiairs turned to other quarters. 
 One point alone, that of the order of succession to the 
 crown of Spain, attracted our notice. During the last 
 120 years it had undergone very different solutions. 
 The old law of the Spanish monarchy called females 
 to the throne in default of direct heirs male, and 
 even down to the reign of Philip Y. the fact and 
 right had conformed. 
 
 In 1714, Philip Y. substituted in place of the 
 Spanish law, not the Salic law as has been said, but 
 a family Pragmatic which restricted the succession of 
 
 E 4
 
 56 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 females to the single contingency that there should 
 be no heirs male whatever, either direct or collateral ; 
 and the Cortes adopted the decree of the King. 
 
 In 1789, Charles IV. revoked the Pragmatic of 
 Philip v., restored the ancient Spanish law, and also 
 obtained the sanction of the Cortes for his measure, 
 but without publishing it. Known to many people, 
 but officially concealed, the royal act and the reports 
 of the Cortes remained in the hands of the King. 
 The Cortes of Cadiz, in the constitution of 1812, 
 maintamed, while regulating it with detail, the prin- 
 ciple of female succession; and on the 3rd of April 
 1830, Ferdinand YIL, during the first pregnancy of 
 Queen Christina, his mfe, after having taken the 
 opinion of the Council of Castille upon the validity of 
 the decree enacted in 1789 by his father Charles IV., 
 ordered it to be suddenly and solemnly proclaimed as 
 the law of the kingdom. The representatives of the 
 courts of Naples and France at Madrid made some 
 efforts to oppose this act ; but when it was declared, 
 their courts did not reject it in any official or positive 
 manner. Two forms of protest, couched in letters 
 intended to be addressed to Ferdinand VII. by the 
 Kings of France and the Two Sicilies, were drawn up 
 in Paris in the bureaux of the ministry of Foreign 
 Affiiirs, when the Revolution of July exploded. The 
 two protests led to nothing, and after all these public 
 or secret oscillations, the female succession was 
 established in 1830 as the ancient and actually exist- 
 ing law of the Spanish monarchy. 
 
 In the month of July 1832, Ferdinand VII. fell
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 57 
 
 ill. The absolutist and priestly party, powerful 
 around liiin and in his council, resolved on a great 
 effort to replace the crown on the head of the Infant 
 Don Carlos, their chief. Queen Christina took alarm, 
 and did not then believe herself m a condition to 
 sustain the struggle for the mterest of her young 
 daughter, now Queen Isabella 11. There was a mo- 
 mentary question of a marriage between the Infanta 
 and the son of Don Carlos, but this idea was soon 
 abandoned; and in September 1832, Ferdmand YII., 
 still seriously ill, revoked the above-named decree of 
 1789, which he had lately called into vigour, and re- 
 established the Pragmatic of Philip Y. Exactly as 
 the latter had passed in 1789 as the decree of Charles 
 IV., the new royal act remained secret and depo- 
 sited, it was said, in the Chancery of Mercy and 
 Justice at Madrid, "with this inscription : "To be 
 opened in case of the King's death, or when he shall 
 direct." 
 
 But scarcely had the Infant Don Carlos and his party 
 achieved this victory, when an unexpected court 
 movement announced their defeat. Ferdinand YII. 
 appeared to recover health. Queen Christina took 
 courage : the moderate party and even the ardent 
 liberals supported her cause ; her sister Donna Luisa 
 Carlotta, married to the Infant Don Francis de Paule, 
 a princess of a bold and haughty character, repaired 
 directly to the King, and denounced in strong terms 
 the intrigue which had taken advantage of his illness 
 to extort from him a concession fatal to his wife and 
 daughter. The King yielded again. The ministers
 
 58 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 favourable to Don Carlos, M. Calomarde and the 
 Count de la Alcudia, were dismissed ; the ambassador 
 of Spain in England, M. Zea Bermudez, head of the 
 moderate party at the court, without siding with the 
 liberals in the nation, was recalled from London to 
 succeed them. Power changed its course; Queen 
 Christina was declared Regent while the King's illness 
 lasted; measures of political clemency and adminis- 
 trative reform were adopted, and at the end of 
 September 1832, Ferdinand VII. resumed the govern- 
 ment, and publicly revoked, as having been surprised 
 from hun durmg his indisposition, his reversal of the 
 decree by which, in 1830, he had declared and placed 
 in vigour the Pragmatic of 1789. On the 4th of April 
 1833, the Cortes were convoked to swear fidelity to 
 the Infanta Isabella. They assembled, in fact, on the 
 20th of June follo'vvuig, took the oath, — and the right 
 of female succession in default of heirs male direct 
 became once more, as it had been pre^dous to the reign 
 of Philip Y., the law of the Spanish monarchy. 
 
 In presence of these legislative and ministerial 
 vicissitudes m Spain, we maintained an attitude of 
 extreme reserve. We were anxious to avoid ofFendmg 
 the rights and pride of the Spaniards by interposing 
 in their internal afikirs; we desired not to impede 
 the recovering fortmie of the moderate party at 
 Madrid, nor to remain indiftercnt to the mterest 
 which rendered the demi-salic law of Philip V. moi:e 
 desirable for us than a system of succession which 
 miglit give the throne of Spain to a prince, as husband 
 of the Queen, unknown and perhaps hostile to the
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 59 
 
 reioiiino: house in France. It is the custom of violent 
 governments to surrender themselves exclusively to 
 certain special state questions, without calculating the 
 different interests by which the position is complicated. 
 But nations, sooner or later, pay dearly for the neglects 
 of this imperfect policy, and rational legislation is 
 bound to think of everything. Six weeks after the for- 
 mation of the cabinet of the 22nd of November 1832, 
 the Duke de Broglie, when giving instructions to the 
 Count de Eayneval, our ambassador at Madrid, dwelt 
 particularly on the various combinations which the 
 existing order of succession in Spain might entail. 
 The court of Naples had renewed the suggestion of 
 a marriage between the eldest son of Don Carlos and 
 the Infanta Isabella. If it appeared that this idea 
 had any chance of adoption, and if the fact should 
 place this young prince on the Spanish throne, as 
 kmg in title and of his own right, M. de Rayneval 
 was. ordered to support liim strenuously. If, however, 
 the son of Don Carlos was only to reign as husband 
 of the Infanta Isabella, the French ambassador was 
 instructed neither to oppose this step nor to sanction 
 it by express approbation ; and even if in the terms 
 of the transaction the question should still remain 
 undecided, he was to exert himself to incline the 
 balance to the side of the male succession. At the 
 same time, on account of the inquietude occasioned 
 by the illness of Ferdinand YII., we increased the 
 number of our troops on the frontier of the Pyrenees. 
 But when M. Zea Bermudez, on his way through 
 Paris to assume office in Spain, expressed some soli-
 
 60 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 citucle as to these military movements and our diplo- 
 matic interference at Madrid, the Duke de Broo;lie 
 hastened to dispel his doubts, and to impress on him 
 full confidence in our respect for the independence of 
 Spain, and in our assurances of amicable support. 
 
 Meanwhile Ferdinand VII. again fell dangerously 
 ill, and, from the commencement of September 1833, 
 the despatches of M. de Rayneval annomiced his 
 death as imminent. He died, in fact, on the 29th 
 of September, and the event found us perfectly de- 
 cided on the conduct to be pursued under the ques- 
 tion that arose. I have already said that, in prmciple, 
 we should have preferred in Spain the mamtenance 
 of the male succession ; and while the matter was still 
 in doubt, M. de Rayneval was instructed to act 
 accordingly. In 1830, before the Revolution of July, 
 and at the moment when it became known in Paris 
 that Ferdinand VII. had revoked the Pragmatic of 
 Philip v., the Duke of Orleans loudly expressed, his 
 disapproval. He even endeavoured to persuade 
 Charles X. and the King of Naples to protest against 
 an act which compromised the future of the house of 
 Bourbon ; and King Louis- Philippe still entertamed 
 in 1833 the opinion he had so decidedly formed, as 
 Duke of Orleans, in 1830. The French government, 
 therefore, at the latter epoch, had no anterior or sys- 
 tematic predilection in favour of the young Queen 
 Isabella, but, under every title, her claim appeared to 
 us to be e^^dent. Charles IV. in 1789, and Fer- 
 dinand VI Lin 1830 and 1833, undoubtedly possessed 
 the same right of restoring the ancient Spanish law
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 61 
 
 of regal succession which Philip V., iii 1714, had 
 exercised for its abolition. Their decree had been 
 equally sanctioned by the Cortes. After all these 
 fluctuations the female title prevailed. Queen Isa- 
 bella held the government at once de facto and de 
 jure. All our information led us to suppose that the 
 national feeling of Spain was favoural^le to her, and 
 that if we were to choose between the contending 
 claimants, she had on her side, in the nation the liberal 
 party, and at court the moderate section, or rather 
 those men who had lately and energetically defended 
 the mdependence of Spain, and who now aspired to 
 establish it by showing themselves disposed to adopt 
 institutions analogous to our own. We could not, 
 therefore, refuse to acknowledge Queen Isabella with- 
 out renouncing at once right and fact, without wound- 
 ing the mdependent sentmients of the Spanish people, 
 and without compromising the future prosj^ects of 
 Spain, and the present friendly understanding between 
 the two States. There was, therefore, not even a 
 momentary hesitation in the French council, either 
 on the part of the King or of his advisers. Before 
 we received positive intelligence of the death of Fer- 
 dinand YIL, the Duke de Broglie had already pre- 
 pared mstructions to regulate the attitude of M. de 
 Kayneval at Madrid, as follows : " On the decease of 
 King Ferdinand, you will be at first in the position 
 of an agent whose official character is suspended 
 until he receives new letters of credit from his court ; 
 but you will, nevertheless, immediately ofl'er to the 
 Queen aU the support she can desire from us. You
 
 C2 EXTERNAL TOLICY. 
 
 will make kno^vii to her, as also to her ministers, our 
 most explicit disposition to accord her that support 
 in the manner and degree which they may consider 
 most advantageous for the interests of the new go- 
 vernment. Moreover you -will not hesitate to declare 
 yourself eveiy where in the same stram ; and if, as we 
 have reason to believe, the cabinet of London ad- 
 dresses analogous instructions to ]\Ir. Yilliers, you 
 will act in concert with that minister so that the 
 perfect identity of your mutual attitude may become 
 generally known, and impress the public mmd." As 
 soon as the death of Ferdmand YII. was announced 
 in Paris by telegraph on the 3rd of October, these 
 instructions were forwarded to Madrid ; and, to invest 
 them with additional authority, M. Mignet, at that 
 time keeper of the archives in the department of 
 Foreign AiFairs, was charged with their delivery, and 
 instructed to comment verbally on them, both with the 
 French ambassador and the Spanish government. 
 
 While traversing the Basque Provinces, he found 
 the insurrection in favour of Don Carlos already 
 commenced. From the month of March preceding, 
 when Ferdinand YII. renewed the abolition of 
 the Pragmatic of Philip Y., the Infant, after pro- 
 testing against the royal act, had been compelled to 
 quit Spain and to retire to Portugal, where he pro- 
 mised himself not only an asylum, but an ally. Civil 
 war was flagrant in that country. Don Miguel, with 
 the aid of the absolute party, maintained against his 
 niece. Donna IMaiia, whom he had detlironed, i)re- 
 tensions much more divested of specious foundations
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. C3 
 
 and legitimate sentiments than those of the Spanish 
 prince. The elder brother of Don Miguel, the Emperor 
 Don Pedro, after abdicating the crown of Brazil in 
 favour of his son, came over to Europe to claim, 
 under the title of regent, the rights of his daughter. 
 The struggle, prolonged for eighteen months under 
 varying phases, inclined at last in favour of the 
 young Queen. Six days before the death of Ferdi- 
 nand VIL, Donna Maria, having left France, where she 
 had been received mth friendly hospitality, disem- 
 barked at Lisbon ; and on the 10th of October, the 
 day of M. Mignet's arrival at Madrid, Don Pedro 
 compelled Don Miguel to raise the siege of the Por- 
 tuguese capital, and reduced his power in that king- 
 dom to a wandermg and expmng effort. But three 
 days earher, on the 7th of October, Don Carlos was 
 proclauned King of Spain at Vittoria ; a band of. his 
 partisans, commanded by the Biscayan Yerastegui, 
 arrested M. Mignet at that place, detained him for 
 several hours, and only allowed him to continue his 
 journey towards Madrid through fear of France. A 
 civil war, destined to be prolonged and bitter, thus 
 sprang up in Spain at the moment of the final defeat 
 of the usurpmg tyrant in Portugal, whose aid the 
 Spanish pretender was on his way to solicit.^ 
 
 In takmg an immediate share in this contest, we 
 were not at first determuied by a sunple comparison 
 of the different royal titles of the parties engaged; 
 considerations of another order strongly mfluenced 
 our resolution. It affords a noble spectacle to see a 
 
 ^ See Historic Documents, No. II.
 
 64 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 people struggling to raise themselves from a long 
 decline, and to resume an actiye and glorious position 
 in the civilized world. SjDain presented this object 
 to Europe, not by a sudden emotion of fancy and 
 national ambition, but by undergoing the severest 
 trials, and by disj)laying under them those heroic 
 qualities which authorize lofty hopes and justify diffi- 
 cult designs. The Spanish people had defended their 
 independence and the throne of their sovereign with 
 indomitable devotion against the conqueror of the 
 kings and nations of the contment. Durmg this 
 long and sanguinary struggle, the desire of political 
 regeneration had sprung up amongst them. It was a 
 necessity of their position as well as an impulse of 
 their souls. In the absence of their captive King and 
 of all regular power, they were compelled to govern 
 themselves. The exercise of political liberty became, 
 vnth. them, the condition of existence. In their at- 
 tempt to found a free government in the very 
 bosom of war, they formed a strange amalgam of 
 modern ideas and the old traditions of their country ; 
 ultra-radical theories mingled themselves confusedly 
 in the conduct of the Cortes of Cadiz, and in the 
 constitution they decreed in 1812, with the maxims of 
 the Catholic faith, and with provincial and municipal 
 habits ; — so that monarchical instincts acquired imper- 
 ceptibly, from this alliance, revolutionary princiijles. 
 A regular and liberal system could not emanate di- 
 rectly from such a chaos, and when, in 1814, Fer- 
 dinand \ll. reascended the throne, he had a fine 
 opportunity of following successfully the? exanq^le of
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 65 
 
 Louis XVIIL, and of reforming without weakening 
 the Spanish monarchy. But instead of supplying a 
 remedy to the new disease of his nation, Ferdmand 
 restored the old complamt. Spain fell back under the 
 thoughtless, incapable, and narrow-minded despotism 
 which for more than a century had ensured her de- 
 cline; and on the King's death, when his daughter 
 Isabella and his brother Don Carlos disputed the 
 crown, the question included in their rivalry was that 
 of determining whether Spain should continue plunged 
 in her ordinary sterile ti'ack, or recommence, with 
 more experience and under better conditions, her 
 political regeneration. Between the contmued decay 
 and laborious resuscitation of this noble people, 
 our neighbour and natural ally, neither moral judg- 
 ment nor political foresight permitted us to hesitate ; 
 it was not alone, therefore, on account of the right of 
 the young Queen, but from sympathy with the cause 
 and future of Spam herself, that we hastened to pro- 
 mise our support. 
 
 What would the government of Queen Isabella do 
 to organize and strengthen itself, while satisfymg 
 the wishes of its partisans ? What quality and mea- 
 sure of support should we be called upon to lend it? 
 From the commencement we saw ourselves engaged 
 with these two questions, and both failed not to im- 
 press us with anxious solicitude. 
 
 Few men have inspired me with more esteem than 
 M. Zea Bermudez, placed, at that time, at the head 
 of the Spanish government. He was a Spaniard of 
 the old type, full of honour, loyalty, and integrity; 
 
 VOL. IV. F
 
 66 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 an equally disinterested and faithful servant of the 
 crown and of his country, serious, persevering, cou- 
 rageous, firm m his conscience, modest in his pride, 
 and simple in his virtue. He had ever shown him- 
 self moderate in the exercise of power, and had in- 
 variably opposed the vindictive and fanatical violence 
 of the party which ranged under the standard of Don 
 Carlos. His devotion to the cause of Queen Isabella 
 and of the Queen Regent confirmed him still more 
 in his moderation ; but, an anti-revolutionist with 
 more honesty than discernment, he desired the abso- 
 lute maintenance of the old Spanish royalty, rejected 
 every great political innovation, and confined his 
 promises of progress to admmistrative refonus. Soon 
 after the 3rd of December 1832, when Ferdmand VII. 
 recalled him from London, to confide to him the 
 direction of Foreign Affixirs at Madrid, M. Zea Ber- 
 mudez, in a circular to the Spanish diplomatic agents, 
 made a striking profession of the policy which re- 
 ceived thenceforward a name, adopted -willingly by 
 himself, — the name of enlightened despotism (illus- 
 trado). After the death of Ferdinand, on the 4th of 
 October 1833, he renewed his declaration, with in- 
 creased solemnity, in the Manifesto published under 
 his dictation by the Queen Regent. 
 
 In any hypothesis, he was wrong thus to pledge, not 
 only himself, but the future of the Queen Regent and 
 of the crown. Nothing at that time in the state 
 of Spain compelled him to announce a systematic 
 and permanent resolution; but his mind was more 
 obstinate than expansive, and he readily adopted the
 
 EXTERNiU:. POLICY. 67 
 
 limit of his O'wn ideas for that of the wants and des- 
 tinies of his country. " It appears to me," M. de 
 Rayneval wrote, on the 7th of October 1833, " that 
 M. Zea will find it very difficult to maintain a long 
 resistance against the universal clamour. He has, if 
 I mistake not, committed one of those faults for which 
 there is no remedy. He could not surely abandon 
 the course he has hitherto followed ; but he ought not 
 to remove all hope from the men to whose counsels 
 the Queen listened durmg the first periods of the 
 King's illness, nor, above all, should he induce the 
 Queen to utter words seeming to rej)roach those 
 counsels which at the time she appeared to approve. 
 
 I believe that, m publishing his manifesto, 
 
 M. Zea's principal object has been the efi'ect it would 
 produce externally. He hopes that if in the Courts 
 of Germany and the North any difficulties should 
 arise to the recognition of Queen Isabella, this lan- 
 guage, and the opinion held of his firmness, will 
 suffice to remove them." 
 
 The impression produced in Paris by the Spanish 
 manifesto accorded with that of M. Rayneval at 
 Madrid. It harmonized little with our own policy, 
 and, as regarded Queen Isabella and her minister, 
 appeared to us an act of useless imprudence. The 
 Duke de Broglie communicated this to M. de Rayneval, 
 and through him to the Spanish government. " If it 
 be true," he wrote on the 12th of October 1833, "that' 
 M. Zea especially proposes to conciliate the Northern 
 powers, this combination convinces me that he has no 
 correct idea of the actual state of Europe. The first 
 
 F 2
 
 68 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 external interest of the new government of Spain is 
 to strengthen itself by France and England. We 
 understand, undoubtedly, that it attaches some value 
 to its recognition by the other courts ; but were they 
 even less desirous than they are to maintain the general 
 peace, they would not venture to take any step in 
 opposition to the cabinets of Paris and London as 
 regards the Peninsula. M. Zea has therefore mis- 
 calculated lamentably in exposing himself to oiFend 
 these two cabinets, whose moderation cannot be sus- 
 pected, by seeking support from the policy of others, 
 who, however disposed they may be to adopt the prin- 
 ciples of this minister, can only serve him by mo\T.ng 
 in strict accordance with France and Great Britain." 
 We thus evinced a friendly solicitude for the Spanish 
 government, whose disposition as to the support Ave 
 offered made us speedily foresee a serious embarrass- 
 ment to ourselves. I have already quoted the words 
 of the Duke de Broglie when communicating this offer 
 to the Count de Rayneval : " You A\all immediately 
 make known," said he, "to the Queen and to her 
 ministers, our formal resolution to afford her our 
 support, in the manner and degree which they may 
 consider most advantageous to the interests of the new 
 government." The Duke's object was to humour the 
 susceptibilities and to dissipate the lowering jealousy of 
 the Spaniards as to any foreign intervention, — a 
 jealousy which M. Zea, while passing through Paris 
 on his return to Madrid, had clearly intimated to him. 
 Also, when, on the 6th of October 1833, we adopted the 
 resolution of increasing our army by 35,000 men, and
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 69 
 
 of adding to our forces on the frontier of the Pyrenees, 
 the Duke de Brogiie hastened to remove from this 
 measure all appearance of premeditated, or even of 
 precautionary interference in the affairs of Spain. 
 " We have no intention," he wrote to M. de Kayneval 
 on the 7th of October, " of organizing an army, pro- 
 perly so called, in the neighbourhood of Spain; our 
 object is simply to reinforce the garrisons of the south. 
 In this sense you must particularly explain yourself 
 with M. Zea. . . . We desire to think that in the mea- 
 sure under discussion the cabinet of Madrid will see 
 much more readily a motive of security than a subject 
 of alarm. While instructing you to declare that the 
 King was ready to afford his support to the govern- 
 ment of the young Queen, in the manner and degree 
 that might be judged useful and appropriate, we have, 
 M. le Comte, entirely laid aside all the suspicions and 
 fears which, under other circumstances, mio-ht be 
 engendered by reading the determination published 
 this day in the ' Moniteur.' " 
 
 But when our offers of support and M. Mignet 
 reached Madrid, the disposition of the Spanish govern- 
 ment was materially changed. The Carlist move- 
 ments had commenced ; the approaching entry of 
 Don Carlos into Spain was announced ; inquietude 
 rapidly possessed the partisans and ministers of the 
 Queen; their jealousy of all prospective intervention 
 on our part disappeared; and no sooner had M. Zea 
 received the communication of M. de Kayneval, than, 
 far from evincing the slightest dissatisfaction or 
 jealousy, he hastened to publish it officially, and in 
 
 r 3
 
 70 EXTEKNAL POLICY. 
 
 terms which materially enlarged its bearing. " The 
 King of the French," said the " Madrid Gazette " of 
 the 12th of October, "offers to the Queen Regent, for 
 the maintenance of her authority and the throne of 
 Queen Isabella, all the support which, under any cir- 
 cumstances, she may consider it desirable to require." 
 
 On reading this article and the despatches acquaint- 
 ing him vnih the sense entertained at Madrid, and 
 which, "svith somewhat more of reserve, M. de 
 llayneval himself seemed to entertain of his first 
 instructions, the Duke de Broglie became seriously 
 uneasy. The King's ministry had never intended to 
 place itself thus at the absolute disposition of the 
 Spanish government, and to pledge itself to their 
 support " under any circumstances whatever, and 
 at their simple demand." In his correspondence mth 
 our ambassador at Madrid, and in his interviews with 
 the Count de Colombi, the Sj^tanish charge d'affaires 
 at Paris, and brother of M. Zea, the Duke hastened 
 to correct the error, and to restore to his instructions 
 their just interpretation. " The prior conduct of M. 
 Z^a," he wi'ote on the 20th of October to M. de 
 Rayneval, " has not prepared us for what seems to be 
 such a prompt and striking de^dation from his OAvn 
 
 principles We have no desire whatever to 
 
 interfere, by armed force, in the affairs of Spain; 
 such a proceeding would be for us, on the contraiy, 
 an extremity much to be dej)lored. Neither do we 
 pretend to support the existing government of Spain 
 under every step it may take, or every incident that 
 may occur, in every line of conduct it may adopt, and
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 71 
 
 in every position in which events may place it. Our 
 msh was to recognise this government openly, to 
 give it strength arid courage by declaring that it might 
 depend on our friendship, and by showing ourselves 
 disposed to listen favourably to its demands if reduced 
 to prefer them; but without dispossessing ourselves 
 of the inherent right of every government to form its 
 own judgment on the opportunity, the nature, and the 
 extent of support accorded." The Duke de Broglie 
 had good reason for expressly reserving this right, 
 for M. Zea, before being apprized of it, and building 
 on his own version of the first instnictions, addressed 
 to the French government, on the 21st of October, 
 the extravagant demand that French troops should 
 unmediately post themselves on the frontiers, and 
 that the general commanding them should be placed 
 under the orders of the French ambassador in Spain, 
 their entry to depend entirely on ad\dces from Madrid. 
 The King's government consented to approach troops 
 to the frontier, but formally refused to remit thus 
 the right of. declaring war into the hands of their 
 ambassador. 
 
 Struck with the necessity of allowing no doubt to 
 remain, either on the minds of our own agents or of 
 the Spaniards themselves, as to the intentions of the 
 King's government, and admitting with noble frank- 
 ness whatever his first words might have contained of 
 excess or obscurity, the Duke de Broglie wrote thus 
 to M. de Rayneval, on the 13th of November 1833: 
 — " Your despatch No. 103 has particularly arrested 
 my attention. Equally with M. Zea you have con- 
 
 F 4
 
 72 EXTEENAL POLICY. 
 
 eluded, from tlie explanations given by me to M. de 
 Colonibi, that tlic idea of the King's government had 
 changed since the day when I authonzed you to offer 
 our support to the Regent. Nothing of the kind 
 has taken place. When, informed of the death of Fer- 
 dinand VII., it became necessary for us to deliberate 
 on the attitude to be assumed and the course to be 
 followed, it was decided at once that we should mani- 
 fest our interest for the cause of the young Queen 
 Isabella by something more than a simple recognition. 
 " DesiiTug, moreover, that our readiness to declare 
 in favour of this cause should not be interpreted at 
 Madrid as implicating any project of controlling the 
 government of the Regent, or of inducing it to adopt 
 measures repugnant to its own views, we have deter- 
 mined not to act, in any case, without the express 
 demand of that government, and to undertake no- 
 thing definitively, except in the manner and degree 
 it may judge desirable. But, at the same time, we 
 have positively established that it is our intention to 
 hold ourselves free to examine, discuss, comply mth, 
 or refuse whatever may be required of us on the part 
 of Spain; and it is with this object that your instruc- 
 tions specify nothing distinctly Avith regard to the 
 nature of the support you are authorized to offer to 
 her Catholic Majesty. Such, Count, have been, from 
 the first moment, the system and intentions of the 
 King's government. I thought I had sufficiently 
 explained them in my despatch of the 4th of October ; 
 I was far from anticipating that it would from thence 
 be concluded at Madrid that we placed ourselves,
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 73 
 
 under all contingencies, purely and simply at the 
 disposal of the Spanish cabinet. There has been a 
 mistake on my part, and I feel called upon to admit 
 that my despatch was very incomplete, as you have 
 yourself adopted a similar interpretation ^Yith that of 
 M. Zea. Be that as it may, as soon as this interpre- 
 tation became known to me by the letter which M. de 
 Colombi received from his brother, I have felt bound 
 to exjDlain myself with him, and to re-establish our rela- 
 tive positions such as we had understood and arranged 
 them. It would have been dangerous for Spain, and 
 painful to us, not to have acknowledged and rectified 
 this misunderstanding until the day when the cabinet 
 of Madrid might have addressed to us one of those 
 demands the necessary rejection of which would 
 have led to a most serious compromise. I have there- 
 fore, in my explanations with M. de Colombi, been 
 careful not to retract the promise of the King's 
 government ; I have only repeated it in its true sig- 
 nificance, and divested it of a commentary it by no 
 means admitted. Finally, I have corrected the mis- 
 take as soon as it came to my knowledge." 
 
 The Duke de Broglie did not stop here. In his 
 interviews with M.de Colombi he entered fully on the 
 question of the armed intervention of France, and 
 laid before him the leading reasons which ought to 
 deter Spain from such a resource. " The three 
 Northern powers," he said, " may delay recognizing 
 the new government of Sjoain, but they will avoid 
 declaring against it, and mil remain neutral as long 
 as they see it trust chiefly to itself for establishment.
 
 74 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 You may be assured it would be quite othenvise as 
 soon as they ascertained that a French army had en- 
 tered the Spanish territory. Besides, you cannot 
 conceal from yourselves that this very intervention, 
 which, regarded as a probable eventuality, already 
 excites so much attention in London, would give rise 
 to parliamentary embarrassments in the British cabi- 
 net, the reaction of which would inevitably be felt in 
 Spain to the detriment of the Queen's cause. In 
 line, as long as her government proceeds and acts on 
 its OAvn strength, it remains free to consult only the 
 exigencies of its position as they may present them- 
 selves; while we, on our part, preserve the entire 
 liberty of not mixing ourselves up with what are ex- 
 clusively the internal affairs of Spain. But you are 
 sufficiently acquainted with the laws and necessities 
 of the system under which we live, to comprehend 
 that, if you solicit the aid of our arms, public 02:)inion 
 in France would then impose on us certain obligations 
 which would become, in fact, so many conditions at- 
 tached to the despatch of that succour." 
 
 M. de Colombi and M. Zea suffered themselves, or 
 at least assumed the air of suffering themselves, to be 
 persuaded ; but we here encountered the first symp- 
 toms of the position preparing for us in our relations 
 with Spain. In the midst of this people, so haughty 
 and persevering in their passions, the different poli- 
 tical parties had no strongly established confidence in 
 themselves, and evinced a singular promptness in 
 callinoj for foreifi:n assistance. The remembrance of 
 the French expedition in 1823, and of its rapid
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 75 
 
 success for the delivery of Ferdinand YIL, was 
 present to all minds; and, after 1833, the constitu- 
 tional Spaniards yielded at once to the temptation of 
 being quickly and easily saved by France, as the ab- 
 solutists had been ten years before. For parties as 
 well as for governments, it is the last trial of msdom 
 and courage to restrain the influence of the impres- 
 sions of the moment, and, in their conduct, to know 
 how to assign to considerations of the future the full 
 place they are entitled to hold. 
 
 To assist M. Zea, whose character we held in 
 honour, we did all that could be done without pro- 
 mising direct intervention, and without pledging our- 
 selves to the consequences of his policy. We offered 
 him facilities for restoring the finances of Spain by con- 
 tracting a foreign loan ; we gave orders that on the re- 
 quest of General Llassder, Captain-General of Catalonia, 
 6000 muskets should be delivered to him, and that 
 the fortress of St. Sebastian, threatened by the insur- 
 gent Carlists, should be provisioned. M. de Ray- 
 neval used all his efforts to brins: the liberals and M. 
 Zea together, and to win over their support for him. 
 But the honest servant of Ferdinand VII. attempted 
 an impossibility in endeavouring to satisfy a party 
 who in the accession of Queen Isabella saw their vic- 
 tory, without accepting either the principles or leaders. 
 Opposition sprang up on all sides; the captains- 
 general appointed by M. Zea set the example of 
 disobedience, and almost of menace. We were so 
 strongly impressed by the state of parties in Spain, 
 that the Duke de Broglie felt it necessary to write in
 
 76 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 detail on this point to M. de Rayneval, to call upon him 
 to point out the impending dangers to M. Zea, and to 
 ask him how he proposed to dissipate them.^ By the 
 time this despatch reached Madrid, the Queen Regent, 
 notwithstanding the esteem and confidence she enter- 
 tained for M. Zea, had ceased to support him. On 
 the 16th of January 1834, the leader of the mode- 
 rates of the court vacated office, and the chief of the 
 moderates of the liberal opposition, M. Martinez de 
 la Rosa, was called to replace him. 
 
 When I first became acquainted with M. Martinez 
 de la Rosa, he was far indeed removed from power, 
 and probably never expected to exercise it in his own 
 country. After five years of detention, at first in a 
 dungeon, and subsequently in the Presidios (fortress) 
 of Ceuta, from no other cause than having been a mem- 
 ber of the Cortes from 1812 to 1814, and also in 1820, 
 he had in 1823 exchanged captivity for exile, and 
 lived as a refugee in Paris, seeking and finding in 
 letters a consolation for the weight of inactivity at a 
 distance from his native land. He called on me one 
 day, to speak of an historical drama, Aben Humaya, 
 or the Revolt of the Moors under Philip 11.^ which he 
 was on the point of bringing out at one of our thea- 
 tres. He explained to me the plot, and read several 
 scenes which inspired me with much interest; but 
 while listening to the work, I was singularly arrested 
 by the author. His physiognomy, at the same time 
 grave, animated, and somewhat melancholy, the noble 
 
 1 See Historic Documents, No. III.
 
 EXTERNAL TOLICY. 77 
 
 simplicity of his manners, the learned elegance of his 
 language, the candid elevation of his sentunents, his 
 perseverance, calm and without gall, in his j^olitical 
 opinions, the evident fruit of conviction rather than 
 of passion or pride, — his entire j)erson and conversa- 
 tion impressed me with a lofty idea of his moral cha- 
 racter and general acquirements. I little foresaw 
 that this generous and eloquent spirit would one day 
 be summoned to govern his country; but I felt con- 
 vinced that he would never fail to reflect honour 
 on it. 
 
 His advent to power was extremely popular. It 
 was the first return of the liberal party, and the 
 first step towards a constitutional system. A rapid 
 accord took place between the new cabinet and the 
 council of regency established by the "will of Ferdi- 
 nand VII. near the Queen-mother. The Marquis 
 de las Amarillas, president of this council, an en- 
 lightened and influential person, had contributed 
 much to the formation of the ministry, and prided 
 himself on having done so. Useful and approved 
 measures signalized its accession, and attested its 
 sound direction. The news from the Basque pro- 
 vinces assumed a better aspect. The public, for the 
 moment, felt satisfied, and hope appeared to dawn for 
 the future. 
 
 But the hopes of parties are imperative and im- 
 patient. The liberals expected from the cabinet the 
 immediate convocation of the Cortes, and the re- 
 establishment of the constitutional system. M. 
 Martinez de la Rosa also proposed this object to him-
 
 78 EXTERNAL TOLICY. 
 
 self, but to reach it, and before gaining it, there were 
 many difficult questions to solve. What should be 
 the power and form of the Cortes? what the mode of 
 their election, the rules of their relations with the 
 Queen's goverimient and the old municipal institu- 
 tions of the country ? How, at this pinnacle of the 
 state, could a division and accordance be made between 
 national traditions and modern ideas? It could 
 neither be the mere nominal Cortes of the last 
 centuiy nor the sovereign Cortes of 1810 which it 
 was sought to restore : a new and complex political 
 order was to be formed. M. Martinez de la Rosa 
 reflected, deliberated, hesitated, and delayed. He was 
 much more a man of principle and meditation than 
 of action. A crowd of difficulties and exio-encies rose 
 up in his mind to which the public gave no heed. 
 It is the disposition of serious and devoted scholars 
 to live in their o^svn thoughts rather than in an in- 
 stinctive and habitual s^nnpathy with the ideas and 
 impressions of the public. They require to satisfy 
 themselves as much, and perhaps more than the spec- 
 tators who watch and wait on them. M. Martinez 
 de la Rosa Avas not alone under the empire of this 
 bias. It reigned also in the Council of Regency, his 
 associated and compelled support. " We must prepare 
 for the assembly of the Cortes," said the Marquis de 
 las Amarillas to M. de Rayneval, " but there is no 
 occasion to hurry the convocation of that body ; when 
 done, it must be according to the old forms, and with- 
 out altering too much the existing constitution : pru- 
 dence requires that we should be cautious in scaring
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 79 
 
 the people of Spain by words to wliicli their ears 
 are not accustomed ; as far as possible, we must use 
 while rejuvenating our old institutions. England has 
 followed this course, and has become as free, en- 
 lightened, and flourishing a country as any in the 
 world, without having to this day a written consti- 
 tution." M. de RajTieval disputed not the importance 
 of this circumspection ; but, as an impartial and 
 free observer, he, and we also in Paris, felt extremely 
 anxious as to the dangers wliich the Spanish cabinet 
 might mcur from indecision and delay on the leading 
 point of its mission. " The sentiments which M. Mar- 
 tinez de la Rosa and M. de las Amarillas have mani- 
 fested to you," the Duke de Broglie wi'ote, on the 25th 
 of January 1834, to the ambassador, " cannot fail to 
 augment the esteem with which they have inspired us, 
 and the confidence we were disposed to place in their 
 wisdom. Nevertheless I shall not conceal from you 
 that, in the plan of conduct they appear to have traced 
 out, one point has surprised us. The idea we had 
 formed of the new ministry was, that we could only 
 see it in one of the elements of a system which ought 
 to be completed by the immediate convocation of the 
 Cortes. We are far from pretending that if the ques- 
 tion could be laid down in an abstract form, if it 
 could be isolated fi-om the general condition of minds, 
 there might not be a real advantage in gradually pre- 
 paring and ripening a determination so important in 
 its consequences for the future of Spain. But, at the 
 point which things have now reached, would not this 
 advantage be more than balanced by the incon-
 
 80 EXTERNiVL TOLICY. 
 
 venicnces inseparable from a system of temporizing? 
 
 Is there not an actual danger in leaving 
 
 the different parties time to enter upon delicate dis- 
 cussions on the nature and form of the Cortes to be 
 convoked ? Are there no grounds for fearing that, by 
 the effect of these discussions, the government may 
 lose something of the absolute liberty which still 
 belon2:s to it as to the mode of convocation and 
 organization of the Cortes ; or, at least, that the resolu- 
 tion it may take at a later period on this important 
 point, — and which adopted now, whatever it might 
 be, would be hailed with enthusiasm and gratitude, 
 — may fail to obtain such unanimous approbation 
 when specious theories, adroitly put forward, shall 
 have seduced and led away inexperienced minds? 
 Ought it not to be expected that the regency, by the 
 anxiety it will evince to satisfy all reasonable desires 
 of public opinion, will surround itself with a popularity 
 which may hereafter give it the necessary strength to 
 resist the exaggerated pretensions of parties ? It is 
 in this view, Count, that you will regulate your inter- 
 course with M. Martinez de la Rosa and the other 
 members of the ministry and of the Council of 
 Regency." 
 
 Facts were not slow in justifying the apprehen- 
 sions of the Duke de Broglie, and in demonstrating 
 the necessity of prompt determinations and settled 
 cjuestions. The hopes conceived on the accession of 
 the ncAV cabinet soon transformed themselves into 
 exigencies, and exigencies into errors. Financial 
 discontent added itself to political misunderstanding.
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 81 
 
 To restore the dilapidated and disordered revenues 
 of Spain, a loan was indispensable ; to accomplish a 
 loan, credit had to be re-established ; to obtain credit, 
 Spain was called upon to show that she was willing 
 and able to discharge her debts. The fate of the 
 old loans, contracted since 1814, whether royal or 
 revolutionary, were to be determined with equity and 
 without delay. We urged Spain to clear off these 
 questions of natural order, as well as others of 
 political organization ; we suggested plans and 
 offered aid. But on this point, as on the convocation 
 of the Cortes, the Spanish government demurred and 
 protracted, and the hesitation of the government 
 excited a ferment in the country. "You have fore- 
 seen the discredit which the new ministry has already 
 brought on itself," M. de Eayneval wrote to the 
 Duke de Brogiie, on the 1st of March 1834; "dis- 
 content increases every day, and appears even stronger 
 in the provinces than in Madrid. The most vexa- 
 tious symptom, in my opinion, is that M. Martinez 
 de la Eosa does not seem to be aware of the state of 
 public opinion. He sees everything on the fair side ; 
 a dangerous tendency in a statesman. I know posi- 
 tively that within the last few days he received a 
 very alarming report from General Dander on the 
 state of Catalonia. The Superintendent- General of 
 Police has laid before him a highly discouraging 
 picture of the condition of the provinces in general. 
 He persists in saying, and, what is worse, in believing, 
 that all goes on for the best. At the same time he 
 defers from one day to another the work relative to 
 
 VOL. IV. G
 
 82 EXTERNAL TOLICY. 
 
 the convocation of the Cortes which he has under- 
 taken, and to which, he says, he wishes to put the 
 last hand before submitting it to the Council of 
 Regency. Such a state of things cannot evidently 
 continue ; the slightest untoward event may not 
 only overthrow the ministry, but plunge all Spain 
 into irremediable anarchy. A prompt remodelUng 
 of the cabinet seems to me indispensable. I say 
 remodelling^ and not a total change^ because I 
 think it important, although his popularity is no 
 longer intact, to retain M. ]\Iartinez de la Rosa, an 
 honest man of recognized integrity, and who may be 
 extremely useful to the government on the assembly 
 of the Cortes, from his ability as an orator, which, in 
 fact, is his brilliant side." M. de Rayneval then 
 named as the auxiliary indicated by general opinion 
 to reinforce and animate the ministry, the Count of 
 Toreno, a man of action, it Avas said, an able 
 financier, influential amongst the moderate liberals, 
 better suited than M. Martinez de la Rosa to treat 
 witli the extreme section of that party without 
 surrendering liimself up to them, and who, although 
 he had refused at first, seemed now disposed to join 
 the cabinet, to promote the adoption of those measures 
 of which he felt the urgent necessity. 
 
 A few days after the arrival of this information 
 from M. de Rayneval, the King's government, more 
 and more impressed by the afi"airs of Spain, and the 
 perils of the existing authority in that country, 
 decided on instructing our ambassador to communi- 
 cate without reserve to the Queen Regent herself the
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 83 
 
 solicitude "we were under, and to induce her to delay- 
 no longer the convocation of the Cortes, the natural 
 consequence of the accession, and the necessary- 
 support of the power of the Queen her daughter. 
 By- two despatches of the 18th and 19th of March, 
 the Duke de Broglie communicated these instructions 
 to M. de Rayneval, in terms equally clear and kind. 
 There was no allusion to any particular name or 
 ministerial combination. M. de Rayneval was even 
 directed to apprize M. Martinez de la Rosa of the 
 step which the King prescribed to his ambassador.^ 
 It occurred most opportunely, for the despatches 
 arrived at Madrid at the moment when M. Martinez 
 de la Rosa had just finished his work on the con- 
 stitutional system of Spain, and was preparing to lay 
 it before the Queen Regent. He presented it, in fact, 
 in the form of a report, dated the 4th of April, and 
 signed by all the ministers. As a sequel to this 
 report came the Royal Statute which regulated the 
 organization, functions, and privileges of the general 
 Cortes of the kingdom. Adopted and signed by the 
 Queen Regent on the 10th of April, the Royal Statute 
 was proclaimed on the 15th at Madrid; and on the 
 20th of May following a royal decree regulated pro- 
 visionally the mode of election of the chamber called 
 des Procuradores^ by confining the electoral ope- 
 rations to the 20th of June, and naming the 26th of 
 July for the solemn opening of the Cortes themselves. 
 If peoples who desire to be free would hold them- 
 
 1 See Historic Documents, No. IV. 
 G 2
 
 84 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 selves bound to be rational, the Spaniards might have 
 acknowledged that their impatience as to the tardiness 
 of M. Martinez de la Rosa was unreasonable, and the 
 merit of his work might have made them forget that 
 it had held them some little time in expectation. 
 The cabinet had not yet been formed for three months, 
 and he had on his hands to prepare and regulate a new 
 government in the midst of a civil war. The Royal 
 Statute manifested a rare intelligence of the conditions 
 of reviving liberty in the bosom of an old social system. 
 M. Martinez de la Rosa had not surrendered himself 
 to the presumptuous and chimerical mania of creation ; 
 he did not pretend to organize anew the entire state ; 
 he took the actual position of society and the Spanish 
 monarchy as pre-existing and incontestable facts, which 
 he was called upon to reform and complete according 
 to the necessities and lights of our own days, but, by 
 respecting and strengthening rather than by destroy- 
 ing, to reconstruct them. The Royal Statute was 
 neither'an abstract declaration of principles and rights, 
 nor a general and systematized constitution. It was the 
 strong resurrection of the Cortes of the kingdom, cal- 
 culated not only to control power, but to exercise over 
 the entire course of government an effective influence, 
 and to bring in gradually all the reforms of which 
 public desire, controlled as it was by free discussion 
 and the features of the times, might impress the neces- 
 sity. The decree contained neither the dogma nor 
 the language of the sovereignty of the people ; it was 
 the intervention of the country in its own government, 
 tempered by patriotic and loyal sincerity, equally
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 85 
 
 divested of timid precautions and arrogant pretences ; 
 and the report addressed to the Queen Regent, which 
 preceded the statute, was a serious and graceful, though 
 a somewhat prohx, exposition of the essential conditions 
 of the representative system, such as they appear in 
 the present age to soundly thinking minds, according 
 to the arguments of science and the experience of 
 policy. 
 
 At the moment of its publication this act was re- 
 ceived in Spain with general approbation. The con- 
 stitutional royalists were really gratified. Their satis- 
 faction, and the general accordance of the public, 
 imposed silence, and even the appearance of content, 
 on the more ardent liberals. The journals, numerous, 
 and free in their opinions, were almost unanimous in 
 eulogium. M. Martinez de la Rosa enjoyed at that 
 crisis, both as a politician and an author, one of those 
 pure and personal gratifications which replace the 
 anxieties and fatigues of a difficult labour by the 
 conviction of a great work accomplished, and worthy 
 of durability. But constitutional labours in our days 
 experience the lot which, according to Tacitus, attended 
 the loves of the Romans, — their success is short and 
 of evil augury. The Royal Statute of M. Martinez de 
 la Rosa had a rival in Spain, which might keep si- 
 lence for a time, but waited only the propitious mo- 
 ment for declaring war. This was the constitution 
 decreed at Cadiz in 1812 by the Cortes of the struggle 
 for national independence, and restored at Madrid in 
 1820 by the Cortes of the revolution, — a work in- 
 spired by ideas and passions essentially opposed to 
 
 G 3
 
 86 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 those wliicli had dictated the Royal Statute. The 
 thorough reconstruction of the political edifice; the 
 absolute sovereignty of the people, — which means of 
 numbers; the unity of the representative assembly; 
 universal suffrage mthout conditions; the complete 
 separation of the legislative and executive power ; the 
 interdiction to the members of the sitting Cortes of 
 being excluded from the Cortes immediately follomng : 
 — all these radical and revolutionary theories were 
 proclaimed and drawn up as laws in the constitution 
 of 1812, with more vigour than they had been in 
 France, in 1791, by the National Convention itself. 
 It was the Rej^ublic, " one and indivisible," reducing 
 the old royalty under its yoke, and taking it into its 
 service. And to sustain this cause it had a party al- 
 ready formed, ripe for contest, and accustomed to rule ; 
 leaders known to the country, who in evil days had 
 defended its independence and vindicated its rights ; 
 full of false ideas and noble sentiments, bad publicists, 
 sincere patriots, and self-sufficient authors. The royal 
 statute shocked their political convictions and wounded 
 their personal vanity. Far from satisfying, M. Mar- 
 tinez de la Rosa by his edict had irritated and rallied 
 them against him. Thenceforward he found himself 
 placed between the Carlists and the revolutionists: 
 he had to sustain two civil wars, — one in full effer- 
 vescence, the other ready to explode. 
 
 External affairs and the success attending them 
 about this period somewhat distracted internal dis- 
 order. Although driven from Lisbon as from Oporto, 
 Don i\Iiguel still maintained in Portugal an obstinate
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 87 
 
 struggle against his niece Donna Maria. He had 
 near his person the infant Don Carlos, who from the 
 Portuguese frontier corresponded with his partisans 
 in Spain, and fomented their insurrections and their 
 hojDes. M. Martinez de la Rosa resolved to put an 
 end to this anarchical hostility between the two king- 
 doms. He concerted with Don Pedro, still Regent 
 for his daughter, and on the 16th of April 1834, at 
 the very time when the Royal Statute was promul- 
 gated in Madrid, a Spanish army, under the command 
 of General Rodil, entered Portugal to drive out Don 
 Carlos and Don Miguel. The Spanish minister in 
 London, the Count of Florida- Blanca, received at the 
 same time with the envoy of Portugal, M. Moraez 
 Sarmento, instructions to demand from the English 
 government their co-operation in attaining this object. 
 Both designs met mth equal and prompt success. 
 General Rodil advanced rapidly into Portugal, driving 
 before him and dispersing the troops of Don Miguel, 
 and on the 13th of April a treaty, to which the signa- 
 tures alone were wanting, was concluded at London 
 between England, Spain, and Portugal, stipulating 
 that the two Queens should unite their forces to expel 
 both the Infants from the Peninsula, and that England 
 would send ships of war to the coasts of Portugal 
 to second them in their enterprise. 
 
 At this point of the negotiation M. de Talleyrand, — 
 informed, as certain evidences say, by the Count of 
 Florida-Blanca, and, according to others, by Lord 
 Palmerston himself, who, it was said, proposed to him 
 the accession of France to the treaty already arranged 
 
 G 4
 
 88 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 between tlie three powers, — forwarded an account to 
 his cabinet of what was passing, and demanded instruc- 
 tions. It was not ^vitlK)ut some surprise that we 
 received this tardy communication, and Admiral de 
 Rigny, our minister of Foreign Affairs after the 
 retirement of the Duke de Broglie, hastened to impart 
 it to M. de Rayneval at Madrid, saying to him : 
 " They intended at first to leave us simply the faculty 
 of acceding to this treaty by a separate act. M. de 
 Talleyrand ha\dng represented that we could not 
 accept such a secondary attitude, it is now proposed 
 to us to take a more direct part in appearance, by 
 means of stipulations inserted in the body of the 
 treaty, which would imply in substance that in con- 
 sideration of our close union with En2;land we had 
 been in\dted to join this alliance, that we had con- 
 sented, and that if it took place we should co-operate 
 for the expulsion of the two pretenders, according to 
 mutual agreement. You see that in reality the second 
 project differs little from the first, and bears almost 
 equally on the ol)jection raised by our ambassador, 
 since it represents us as merely interposing in 
 the arrangement in question under the auspices of 
 England. I have written to M. de Talleyrand in- 
 structing him to propose a counter-project, according 
 to which the contracting parties would be placed in a 
 less unequal position. In case this measure should 
 not be adopted, the council would then deliberate on 
 the course to be taken. I have no occasion to tell 
 you. Count, tliat in demanding this modification we 
 are moved by no vain susceptiljility, but we bow to
 
 EXTEKNAL POLICY. 89 
 
 questions of general interest In the actual 
 
 situation of Spain, we believe that everything which 
 might tend to represent that country as not acting in 
 the most perfect accord with France, would teem with 
 
 dangers for the Queen's government The 
 
 partisans of Don Carlos, if they saw France co-operate 
 with less readiness than England, or remain entirely 
 unconnected with an act directed against them, would 
 not fail to assume that we withdraw our support 
 from the Queen Eegent, or that we desire at least to 
 
 remain neuter If then we regret that another 
 
 direction has not been given to the London negotia- 
 tion, it is, above all, in a friendly spirit towards Spain. 
 We are the more compelled to feel surprise that a 
 Spanish diplomatist, who might be supposed to be 
 well acquainted with the disposition of his govern- 
 ment, should lend himself to an arrangement as little 
 conformable to the true interests of his country as to 
 the ties that unite her to France ; and our astonish- 
 ment redoubles when we refer to the note by which, 
 on the 27th of January last, M. Martinez de la Rosa 
 demanded our co-operation to drive Don Carlos from 
 Portugal, — a note which Count Florida- Blanca must 
 of necessity be acquainted mth." 
 
 The apology, somewhat embarrassed, of the Spa- 
 nish government, was speedily offered. *' I have 
 hastened to see M. Martinez de la Rosa," replied M. 
 de Rayneval to Admiral de Rigny, on the 2nd of May. 
 " He was little prepared to expect such a promj^t de- 
 nouement of the negotiation carried on by M. de 
 Florida-Blanca. He has confirmed to me what you
 
 90 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 assumed, that that minister has exceeded his instruc- 
 tions, or, to speak more correctly, that he has acted 
 without instructions, and even without powers. He 
 was surprised himself^ at the unexpected facility of 
 the British cabinet ; it was, as we may express it, for 
 the acquittal of his conscience that he addressed to 
 it the note, the translation of which was appended to 
 your despatches.^ It appears to me certain that it 
 was not as a deliberate proposal, still less as the re- 
 sult of instructions from his government, that he has 
 adopted, as regards France, the step with which you 
 reproach him. He has obeyed, without reflection, the 
 impulse which the Portuguese envoy, or perhaps even 
 the English cabinet, has imparted to him. Your 
 Excellency cannot be ignorant of what I liave several 
 times suggested to you, — the little anxiety of England 
 to admit us into any transactions relative to Portugal. 
 But if M. de Florida-Blanca did not at first feel the 
 full value of our participation in the convention of 
 the 22nd of April, it was not so with M. Martinez de 
 la Rosa. At once he recognized this as the most im- 
 portant point for Spain, and that without it the treaty 
 would be an act of inferior value." 
 
 At London also, when the French cabinet, while 
 expressing its surprise at the silence maintained as to 
 this negotiation, rejected the secondary position pro- 
 posed in the treaty, the necessity of a change of atti- 
 tude was speedily felt. The counter-project presented 
 by M. de Talleyrand was accepted, in spite of the 
 
 ' Tlwit is to say, the Count Florida-Blanca. 
 2 That note Avas dated the 10th of April 1834.
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 91 
 
 dissatisfaction warmly expressed by Lord Palmer- 
 ston, and, on the 24th of April, Admiral de Kigny 
 was enabled to write thus to M. de Kayneval : — " The 
 treaty I named to you in my despatch of the 18 th 
 was signed yesterday, and M. de Talleyrand forwards 
 to you directly a copy. You will see that justice has 
 been done to our objections against the completion of 
 the arrangement at first submitted to us." 
 
 Some have traced in this proceeding of the English 
 cabinet a proof of the iU-feeling, and indeed, it has 
 been often said, of the hatred of Lord Palmerston 
 towards France. I believe this to be a mistake. 
 Lord Palmerston has neither hatred nor ill-will 
 towards France. He is an Englishman who serves 
 England, and his sentiments vary with his conduct, 
 according to what, in his eyes, the interest of his 
 country requires. It may be said, and I incline to 
 think, that he gives himself up too exclusively to 
 this patriotic egotism, and that, in his zeal for the 
 success and political honour of England, he estimates 
 too slightly the moral sentiments and necessities of 
 natural justice which modern civilization has deve- 
 loped in men's minds on the subject of international 
 relations. Patriotic egotism is legitimate, provided 
 it does not too much resemble the rude indifference 
 of the barbarous ages. But to this disposition Lord 
 Palmerston adds another, which in the exercise of 
 affairs embraces serious inconveniences. The special 
 question of the moment with which he is occupied 
 engages him to this extreme point, that it sets aside 
 every other consideration and idea. Although of a
 
 92 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 singularly active spirit, fertile, sagacious, and \igorous, 
 he has not Jhat permanent grandeur of imagination 
 and thought which never loses sight of things in 
 their entire scope, and which assigns to every interest 
 and to every separate aifair the exact place and 
 degree of importance which belongs to it in the 
 general system of the interests and affairs of the 
 country. He incessantly forgets the extended policy 
 in which he is engaged, and Avhich, in his mind, 
 becomes concentrated in each distinct question as it 
 successively presents itself, and is treated by him 
 "with energetic ability, but without foresight. To 
 preserve a good understanding with France was, in 
 1834, the smcere object of the cabinet to which he 
 belonged, as it was also his o^svn wish; but when 
 the active co-ojoeration of the two poAvers was de- 
 manded in the Peninsula, Lord Palmerston thought 
 only of maintaining the exclusive preponderance of 
 England in Portugal, as if the affairs of that kingdom 
 were not then closely linked to those of Spain ; and 
 of combating in Spain the influence of France, as if 
 Louis XIV. and the family compact were still in 
 existence. Hence arose his silence at the commence- 
 ment of the negotiation, his eagerness to prepare the 
 treaty without our concurrence, and his discontent 
 when it became necessary to place us in our proper 
 position. Without the influence of his colleagues, 
 and ^particularly of Lord Grey, more carefid than he 
 was of the general policy of England, that position 
 would have been more obstinately contested. 
 
 No sooner was the treaty of the quadruple alliance
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 93 
 
 concluded than it became eflfective. In Europe, the 
 consequences surpassed the actual importance. It was 
 generally received as a brilliant union of two great 
 constitutional kingdoms in reply and as a counter- 
 poise to the combination of the absolute monarchies. 
 Neither the French nor the English cabinet intended 
 to give it this bearing, but mllingly accepted the 
 interpretation. In Portugal, the treaty decided the 
 defeat and retirement of the two pretenders. It 
 reached Lisbon on the 5th of May, and, by the 26th, 
 Don Miguel, beaten, pursued, and surrounded by the 
 Spanish army and that of Don Pedro, capitulated at 
 Evora, engagmg, for a pension of 375,000 francs, never 
 again to enter Portugal, and embarked for Italy. 
 The Infant Don Carlos was completely forgotten in 
 this capitulation; but the secretary to the English 
 legation, Mr. Grant, more moved by the distress of 
 that prince than was his royal ally, represented to the 
 generals of Don Pedro the indignity of such an over- 
 sight, and on the same day signed with them certain 
 articles in virtue of which the Infant, without con- 
 dition or engagement on his part, was conducted in 
 safety to the neighbouring small port of Aldea-Gal- 
 lega, and from thence immediately embarked for 
 England. 
 
 On the first rumour of this part of the arrangement, 
 M. Martinez de la Rosa evinced the most lively un- 
 easiness. " He is extremely dissatisfied," wrote M. 
 de Rayneval to Admiral de Rigny, " that in regu- 
 lating the departure and embarkation of Don Carlos, 
 it has not been imposed on him as a condition to con-
 
 94 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 tract an engagement similar to that required from 
 Don Miguel. On the eve preceding the day when 
 he received intelligence of the a2:)proaching departure 
 of Don Carlos, in a conference wliich Mr. Yilliers and 
 I held with him, he expressed his desire that the Infant 
 should not be permitted to quit Portugal until the 
 powers who had signed the treaty of London agreed 
 as to the place of his future residence." And on the 
 same day when M. de Rayneval penned this despatch, 
 M. Martinez de la Rosa addressed a long note to him 
 and to the English minister, in which, after laying 
 open all the causes of his anxiety, he formally demanded 
 "that Don Carlos should be called on for specific 
 guarantees similar to those exacted from the Infant 
 Don Miguel; that he should not be left at liberty 
 to fix the place of his residence, as he might, for 
 instance, make choice of some one of those states 
 which had not yet recognized the legitimate Queen of 
 Spain. Finally, that the contracting powers to the 
 treaty of London should declare it available and still 
 subsisting, although the immediate object had been 
 attained, so that it might not become vain and illusory 
 if one of the two princes, or both combined, were 
 again to disturb the tranquillity of these kingdoms." 
 " M. Martinez de la Rosa, who dreads extremely," 
 wrote M. de Rajnieval, " not that the departure of 
 Don Carlos without guarantees for Spain can menace 
 this country with real dangers, but that the result may 
 cause the ministiy to be taxed with imjDrovidence and 
 incapacity, desires most ardently that some means 
 may be found of reparing the omission of wliich he 
 complains."
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 95 
 
 The anxieties of M. Martinez cle la Rosa were less 
 personal and more soundly based than M. de Rayneval 
 believed. Within fifteen days after liis disembarkation 
 in England, Don Carlos departed again, crossed the 
 Channel, arrived on the 4th of July at Paris, on the 
 6th at Bordeaux, on the 8th at Bayonne ; and on the 
 10th he was beyond the Pyrenees, at Elisondo, at the 
 head, or, to speak more correctly, in the midst of an 
 insurrection raised in his name. 
 
 Loud were the outcries against the inability or 
 negligence of the police. It was said, to aggravate their 
 fault, that Don Carlos had passed several days in Paris 
 in one of the most frequented streets, and that he had 
 made visits in an open carriage. The Prefect of Police, 
 M. Gisquet, formally denied this assertion : " Don 
 Carlos," he said, " only rested twenty-four hours in 
 Paris ; while there he shut himself up in his lodgings, 
 and did not, as I believe, make known his presence to 
 more than two of his devoted partisans."^ Others, 
 to account for the success of the Infant, have attached 
 much value to the secret aid afforded to him, in the 
 name of legitimacy, by the powers who had not yet 
 recognized Queen Isabella, — a real aid, for we were 
 compelled, shortly after the arrival of the Infant in 
 Navarre, to withdraw the exequatur from the Prussian 
 consul at Bayonne, who acted as intermediary in the 
 correspondence of the insurgents; and the Duke de 
 Frias, at that time ambassador from Spain in Paris, 
 speaking with me one day of the pecuniary succours 
 
 ' Memoirs of M. Gisquet, vol. i. pp. 511, 515.
 
 96 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 furnished to Don Carlos by the Northern courts, 
 assured me that he had himself intercepted a sum of 
 125,000 francs forwarded with that object. But neither 
 the connivance of remote cabinets, always cold and 
 parsimonious even in their favours, nor the insuf- 
 ficiency, faulty or inevitable, of the police, determined 
 this first success of Don Carlos, or encouraged the 
 boldness of a prince, otherwise timid and ordinary, to 
 encounter such perils. He had in Spain and in Europe 
 an actual political party, men convinced that the 
 right was his, and for this sole reason ardent in his 
 cause. It shows an incorrect knowledge of human 
 nature to seek in incidents purely material the ex- 
 planation of such enterprises and the obstinate per- 
 severance attendino: them: we must look for higher 
 causes, — faith, sound or erroneous, in a moral princi2:)le, 
 and the passion for heroic adventures ; the desire of 
 re-establishing right, and also that of animating life 
 by noble and stirring emotions. Here are the moving 
 springs which urge men to risk and sacrifice every- 
 thing, even the peace of their country ; and civil war, 
 which has proved so often the scourge of nations, is, 
 in this sense at least, not their dishonour. 
 
 By a fatal coincidence, at the moment when the 
 unexpected presence of Don Carlos in the Basque pro- 
 vinces redoubled the energy of the insurgents in that 
 quarter, and revived throughout Spain the hopes of 
 his partisans, the Cortes Avere on the point of assem- 
 bling at Madrid, bringing back upon the scene nearly 
 all the survivors of the Cortes of 1812 and 1820, 
 with their theories, passions, and the ever-cherished
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 97 
 
 remembrance of their work, — of that radical consti- 
 tution, the place of which was now occupied by the 
 Eoyal Statute. And that nothing might be wanting 
 to the conflagration, eight days before the meeting of 
 the Cortes, the cholera broke out at Madrid mth ex- 
 cessive violence, and excited those terrors and popular 
 disorders of which political factions are so prompt and 
 skilful in availing themselves. " I have sad events 
 to announce to you," M. de Rayneval wrote to Ad- 
 miral de Rigny on the 18th and 20th of July ; "the 
 uneasiness occasioned by the symptoms of the epidemic 
 which had been observed in Madrid began to calm 
 down, and all was prepared for the return of the 
 Queen, when, suddenly, on the morning of the 16th, 
 the cholera manifested itself throughout the entire 
 city with unaccountable virulence. In a few hours it 
 seized nearly three hundred victims. In the evening, 
 a commencement of disorder became visible; those 
 same reports of poisoning the fountains, which in all 
 places have been eagerly received by the people, were 
 circulated with surprising activity, and propagated 
 more by malevolence than credulity. The priests, 
 and especially the Jesuits, have been denounced as 
 the authors of this imaginary crime. Yesterday 
 morning, several monks were killed in the streets. 
 At length the populace, excited by plotters, and ac- 
 companied, as is confidently asserted, by many mem- 
 bers of the town guard, moved against the convent of 
 the Jesuits, and of those of St. Thomas, and of the 
 Fathers of Mercy. It seems that, at the first, resist- 
 ance was oflfered, and that some shots were fired from 
 
 VOL. IV. H
 
 98 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 the wndows on the assailants, who having forced the 
 gates, laid violent hands upon all who were not able 
 to escape. The exact number of those who perished 
 is not known, — some speak of ten or twelve, others 
 of thirty or forty. The two other convents having 
 been evacuated in time by the monks, no lives were 
 lost there, but the buildings were forced and com- 
 pletely pillaged If this essay which the 
 
 agitators have just made of their strength remains 
 unpunished, the whole moral force of the government 
 is destroyed from this moment, and it is not possible 
 to see what rampart can be opposed to the revolu- 
 tionary inundation which threatens it The day 
 
 of the 17 th has clearly demonstrated that a disorgan- 
 ising party is formed in secret, and that it is much 
 stronger than the cabinet, and M. Martinez de la 
 Rosa in particular, had supposed. This movement, 
 so sudden and violent, and the atrocities by which it 
 has been accompanied, have deeply affected the First 
 Minister. He has seen in a moment the destruction 
 of his dearest hope, — that of arriving at a change of 
 political order in Spain, without sullying the period 
 during which he has played the leading part, with 
 crimes or excesses. In unison with this sentiment, 
 he experiences the fear that until now he has availed 
 nothing, in not being able to restrain the extreme 
 party." 
 
 In this melancholy state of public affairs and of 
 his own mind, M. Martinez de la Rosa, nevertheless, 
 was not found wanting either to his country or to 
 liimself Since the month of June, he had gratified
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 99 
 
 a general desire, and strengthened his cabinet by- 
 calling the Count of Toreno to the Ministry of Fi- 
 nance. Two days after the disturbances which had 
 stained Madrid with blood, he dismissed the various 
 civil and military authorities who had shown them- 
 selves weak against the revolt. A royal decree inter- 
 dicted under severe penalties every description of 
 secret plot or seditious manifestation. " It remains 
 to be proved," wrote M. de Rayneval, " whether all 
 this will not confine itself, as too often happens here, 
 to mere words, and whether the government will be 
 strong enough to execute what it proposes." M. Mar- 
 tinez de la Rosa had, moreover, a pressing and deli- 
 cate question to resolve. The Cortes were convoked 
 for the 24:th of July. Should he, on account of the 
 cholera, which still continued to rage with violence, 
 adjourn their opening, or if not, should the Queen- 
 Regent return from Aranjuez, to impart, by her pre- 
 sence, that solemnity to the ceremony which the public 
 looked for ? Queen Christina and her Ministry, on these 
 points, adopted the most courageous and worthiest 
 course. The Cortes were not adjourned, and on the 
 24th of July, 1834, the Regent, seated on the left of 
 the empty throne of the young Queen her daughter, 
 inaugurated with a speech of remarkable dignity and 
 frankness the dawn of the constitutional system in 
 the Spanish monarchy. 
 
 On the eve of the same day, the attack of the 
 constitution of 1812 against the Royal Statute of 1834 
 commenced. A plot was discovered, the object of 
 which was to re-establish that constitution in the 
 
 H 2
 
 100 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 midst of the royal session, and before any one, either 
 Queen or nation, had taken oath to the Statute. The 
 chief conspirators were arrested, and the cabinet had 
 the mortification of findinf]i: amonfjst them one of the 
 most heroic defenders of SjDain, General Palafox, who 
 a few days before had been created by the Queen- 
 Regent, Duke of Saragossa, in commemoration of the 
 glorious defence of that city ; — a sad symptom of the 
 disease of minds, and a deplorable prognostic of the 
 struggle about to commence. Men whom Spain 
 honoured, and on just grounds, for they were of those 
 who had saved and wished to see her free, declared 
 war upon the rising constitutional monarchy; and 
 against other men, also sincere patriots and their 
 former friends, because they refused to adopt political 
 theories which tend to produce revolutions, but never 
 establish liberty. 
 
 The entire session of the Cortes in the chamber of 
 the Procur adores (Deputies) was taken up with the 
 development of this war ; and it burst forth especially 
 on tliree questions: the address of the chamber in 
 reply to the speech from the throne ; a petition, which 
 demanded a declaration of rights, a confused mixture 
 of absolute maxims and promises in favour of the 
 various public liberties which theEoyal Statute had 
 not regulated ; and the details of finance, above all 
 those of the different loans contracted in the name of 
 Spain from 1814 to 1830. The same feature pre- 
 vailed in all these debates. It was ever the revo- 
 lutionary government of Spain, from 1810 to 1814, 
 and from 1820 to 1823, disputing empire with the
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 101 
 
 constitutional system which, in accordance with the 
 ancient royalty, the moderate politicians endeavoured 
 to establish. Neither sincerity, nor talent, nor 
 courao-e were wantino- on either side. I do not 
 hesitate to think and declare that in enlightenment, 
 in the true spirit of policy and in intelligence, as well 
 as in respect for the great moral laws which finally 
 decide the fate of institutions and nations, the 
 defenders of the Eoyal Statute had greatly the advan- 
 tage over their adversaries; but they were engaged 
 ■with liberal prejudices and popular passions, and 
 their worthy leader, M. Martinez de la Kosa, had 
 neither the practical tact and promptitude of reso- 
 lution and action, nor the skilful management of men, 
 which in aU tunes, and particularly in stormy days, 
 form the indispensable conditions. of success in govern- 
 ment. He sustained the debates with eloquence, he 
 yielded concessions, he resigned himself to checks; 
 but whether through his OAvn fault, or the fatality of 
 his position, the violence of the attack exceeded the 
 power of resistance ; and in this parliamentary struggle, 
 where reason and power were on his side, the cabinet 
 rapidly exhausted, instead of strengthening itself. 
 It bowed at the same tune under the pressure of 
 civil war, becoming more obstinate from day to day. 
 In vain the Cortes ardently denounced the Carlists ; 
 in vain the Cabinet despatched against Don Carlos in 
 the Basque Provinces the conqueror of Don Miguel 
 in Portugal, — General Rodil, with his army. The 
 insurrection had found in Zumalacarreguy one of those 
 improvised leaders, who at once display the qualities 
 
 H 3
 
 102 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 of a great soldier, a partisan, and a popular hero. 
 After some successes at the outset, Rodil and his 
 lieutenants met "vvith nothing but repeated defeats. 
 The Cabinet recalled him, and gave the command of 
 the Queen's troops to Mina, flattering itself that the 
 renown and skill of the veteran chief would triumph 
 over his younger rival; but Mina, though always 
 ardent and in favour with the enthusiastic party, was 
 worn out and ill; some well-directed strokes, which 
 marked his arrival, produced no decisive result, and 
 the passions as well as the habits of the two opposing 
 commanders rendered the war cruel even to ferocity. 
 Mina threatened capital punishment to all who 
 should be found on the high-road without sufficient 
 reason, between the setting and the rising of the sun. 
 Zumalacarreguy added to the order of the day issued 
 to his troops, victory or death. On both sides no 
 quarter was given on the field of battle, and when the 
 fighting ended, prisoners were shot without mercy. 
 Bands, at first suppressed, re-appeared in Arragon 
 and Catalonia; others threatened to organise them- 
 selves in the provinces of the centre, the west, and the 
 south. The more the acts and exhibitions of war 
 became odious, the more its end appeared uncertain 
 and perhaps impossible. 
 
 Then commenced with tliis people, so proud and 
 independent, a strange phenomenon : on all sides they 
 began to talk of the necessity of foreign interference. 
 Not only in the provinces desolated by the war, but 
 in Madrid ; not only amongst the politicians, but with 
 the soldiers ; in the Cortes, in the Council of Regency,
 
 EXTERNAL rOHCY. 103 
 
 in the bosom of the cabinet, it was declared that 
 foreign intervention alone could put an end to this 
 struggle. Deputies arrived from Biscay and from 
 Navarre, to declare to the government that such was 
 their advice and desire. The moderate members of 
 the Cortes waited upon M. Martinez de la Rosa to ex- 
 press the same conviction. General Llassder, now 
 Minister of War, held similar language to M. de Ray- 
 neval. General Cordova, returning from the army, 
 explained himself in the same sense. The Marquis de 
 las Amarillas said frankly in the Council of Regency : 
 " The forces at the disposal of government for the 
 reduction of the insurgent provinces are insufficient. 
 There are only three methods of obtaining this result : 
 the first is a convention with these provinces — a means 
 indicated at a period already remote by the Council 
 of Regency, and which to-day presents many difficul- 
 ties and few chances of success ; the second, the media- 
 tion of the French government, which, with this object, 
 should receive full powers from the Spanish authorities, 
 and would become guarantee for the stipulations agreed 
 upon; the third, the armed intervention of France." 
 Before the question thus laid down, the Count of To- 
 reno maintained an attitude of reserve, for the moment 
 more opposed than favourable to intervention. M. 
 Martinez de la Rosa loudly rejected the idea. " Even 
 though all Spain should call for French interference," 
 he had said, at the time of signing the treaty of the 
 Quadruple Alliance, " there was at least one Spaniard 
 who would oppose it, and that Spaniard was himself." 
 Without holding, at the close of the year 1834, a lan- 
 
 H 4
 
 104 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 guage so absolute, lie persisted in his opposition against 
 all appeal to foreign arms to settle the quarrels of the 
 Sj)aniards amongst themselves. Two small printed 
 circulars, which announced the entry of a French army 
 into Spain, had been hawked about the streets of 
 Madrid, authorised, it was said, by the police them- 
 selves. M. Martinez de la Rosa formally interdicted 
 to the blind men, the professional public criers of the 
 capital, any distribution of printed or wi'itten bills not 
 sanctioned by the approbation of the censorsliip. It 
 was the First Minister, standing almost alone, who 
 maintained the dignity of the country against public 
 disquietude and impatience. 
 
 When transmitting this intelligence to us, M. de 
 Rayneval added his own idea, and showed that he also 
 felt convinced that the armed intervention of France 
 alone could stifle the civil war in Spain, and rescue the 
 throne of Queen Isabella from the dangers mth which 
 it was menaced. 
 
 We were equally grieved and surprised at the state 
 of events beyond the Pyrenees. Not that we enter- 
 tained the slightest doubt of our right to judge freely 
 of them, and to act only in accordance with the in- 
 terests of France. I have already said 'svitli what 
 care, immediately after the accession of Queen Isabella, 
 the Duke de Broglie had explained and established 
 our notion on this point. We had neglected nothing 
 since then to maintain the liberty of our resolutions, 
 and to impress them thoroughly upon the Spanish 
 irovcrnment. 
 
 On learning the arrival of Don Carlos in the
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 105 
 
 Basque Provinces, Admiral de Rigny wrote as follows 
 to M. de Rayneval : " You cannot be too careful, not 
 only in declining any request that may be proposed 
 to you for effectual intervention, but also in pre- 
 venting, if possible, the occurrence of such an idea 
 to the Spanish ministry; and if it should decide on 
 asking that description of aid from us, you must sedu- 
 lously avoid any ground for anticipating our decision. 
 
 The revolt of three or four small provinces, 
 
 which collectively do not exceed in population and 
 extent one of our ordinary departments, and in which 
 the towns have remained faithful to the government, 
 seems to me utterly insufficient to justify an appeal 
 to foreign force. La Vendee, on several repetitions, 
 has presented very different obstacles to a govern- 
 ment surrounded by external enemies. We have 
 triumphed over them nevertheless, still less by force 
 than by the action of time, by the lassitude of the 
 people themselves, and by substituting a mixture of 
 prudence to the measures of terror which had been 
 employed in the first instance. Nay, it was also said 
 that it would be found impossible to subdue by 
 regular means an insurrection which lasted not a few 
 months, but several years. The event has proved 
 the contrary. It is in this sense that you must 
 express yourself, should you have reason to believe 
 that our interference is likely to be called for." ^ 
 
 While holding this language, we were warmly dis- 
 posed to hasten to the aid of the Spanish government, 
 
 ' Despatches of the 16th and 22iid of July, and of the 12th of 
 December, 1834.
 
 lUC) EXTERNAL TOLICY. 
 
 and to give it moral strength, as the indirect means 
 which it required to be enabled to avail itself 
 effectually of its own resources. M. Martinez de la 
 Rosa had expressed a desire that, by an official act, 
 the contracting powers to the treaty of the Quad- 
 ruple Alliance should declare it applicable to the new 
 circumstances in which the return of Don Carlos had 
 placed Spain. We hastened to satisfy this ^vish, and 
 on the 18th of August, 1834, additional articles were 
 signed in London, to the folloAving effect: 1. His Ma- 
 jesty the King of the French pledges himself to adopt 
 in that portion of his States which borders on Spain the 
 measures best calculated to prevent the despatch of any 
 kind of succour, whether in men, arms, or ammunition, 
 from the French territory to the Spanish insurgents. 
 2. His Majesty the King of the United Kingdom of 
 Great Britain and Ireland engages to supply to Her 
 Catholic Majesty all the succour in arms and 
 ammunition that Her Catholic Majesty may require, 
 and in addition, to assist her with naval forces should 
 such become necessary." In fact, we redoubled our 
 vigilance on the frontier of the Pyrenees, to prevent 
 the Carlist insurrection from receiving any aid in 
 France. We reinforced the ser\ace of the customs, 
 and established posts of circulating gendarmerie. 
 It Avas then that we withdrew the exequatur from 
 the Prussian Consul, through whom the corres- 
 pondence of the insurgents had passed: and on 
 the 22nd of July, 1834, Admiral de Rigny wrote 
 thus to M. de Rayneval : — "It might possibly suit 
 the Spanish government to take into its pay some
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 107 
 
 portion of the foreign legion we have at present in 
 Africa. Should it be so, we might perhaps furnish 
 four or five thousand armed men, to be disembarked 
 at Carthagena." We offered and rendered to the 
 Spanish monarchy all the good offices it could expect 
 from sincere allies, who only rejected the perspective 
 of having to answer for its destinies by placing their 
 forces at its unrestrained disposal. 
 
 But Spain and the Spanish government were in 
 prey to other dangers than those of the civil war in 
 the Basque Provinces. At one time, by taking ad- 
 vantage of those dangers and the anxious irritation 
 they excited in the country, at another by their own 
 direct and personal impulse, the radical party waged 
 from day to day a more determined and formidable 
 war against the Ministry and the Royal Statute. 
 Within the Chambers, M. Martinez de la Rosa, and 
 M. de Toreno, resisted with courage and ability 
 sometimes effectual; — the Chamber of the Proceres 
 (Nobles) supported them firmly; and in the Chamber 
 of the Procuradores (Deputies) they alternately lost 
 and regained a majority, always uncertain : but 
 externally, power was absolutely deficient in unity 
 and means of action. The remains of the old local li- 
 berties, and the inexperienced attempts of new liberties 
 equally supplied causes of anarchy. Attacks against 
 the moderate cabinet blazed forth on all sides ; now 
 to demand the constitution of 1812, and now for 
 the sole gratification of revolutionary passions. The 
 spirit of revolt reached the army itself. On the 
 18th of January, 1835, at Madrid, eight hundred
 
 108 EXTEKNAL POLICY. 
 
 men of the 2nd regiment of the light infantry of 
 Arragon broke out, crying, " Liberty for ever, doAvn 
 with the ministers ! " The Captain-General of Old 
 Castille, General Comterac, ran to call them to order, 
 and fell under several musket shots. They seized 
 the Post Office, defended themselves there against the 
 loyal troops, and escaped with no other punishment 
 than that of joining, in the Basque Provinces, the 
 army fighting against the Carlists. In February, 
 March, and April, at Malaga, Saragossa, and in Murcia ; 
 in one place against an order of discipline issued by 
 the Minister of War; in another against an inter- 
 diction of the Archbishop, who was unwilling that the 
 choristers of the cathedral should sing patriotic airs 
 in the theatre, violent popular seditions disturbed the 
 public peace, ending always with the ciy, " Long live 
 the constitution of 1812," and in the massacre of 
 several monks. The mutual barbarities of the civil 
 war in the Basque Pro\dnces had excited a \ivid 
 sentiment of reprobation in Europe. The English 
 cabinet had despatched to Biscay a special commis- 
 sioner. Lord Elliot, to endeavour to put a stop to 
 them, and we had formally concurred in the object of 
 his mission. A convention was, in consequence, 
 concluded on the 28th of April 1835, between General 
 Yaldez, who had succeeded Mina, and Zumala- 
 carreguy, to this effect : " That the lives of prisoners 
 should be respected, that they should be exchanged 
 two or three times per month, and that no one should 
 be put to death for his political opinions without 
 being tried and condemned according to the existing
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 109 
 
 laws of Spain." This act of strict justice and simple 
 humanity excited in the Chamber of the Procuradores 
 a violent storm. It was, they said, the fruit of 
 foreign influence. Why had the ministers sanctioned 
 any treaty with Zumalacarreguy, a leader of rebels? 
 It was demanded, and the motion was adopted, that 
 the treaty should be communicated to the Chambers, 
 who would examine its motives; and on the 11th of 
 May, at the conclusion of a sitting in which M. 
 Martinez de la Rosa had courageously defended the 
 treaty, a popular assembly intercepted his passage, 
 and pursued him to his residence \n\h insults, and 
 the cry of " Long live the Constitution ! " 
 
 So many contests and perils, and so much helpless- 
 ness in the presence of two opposing enemies, ex- 
 hausted the confidence and wearied the patience of 
 M. Martinez de la Rosa himself. The Council of 
 Regency combined with the Council of Ministers, and 
 on the 17th of May, 1835, a resolution was there 
 unanimously adopted; " to demand the armed co- 
 operation of the powers who had signed the treaty of 
 the 22nd of April, 1834," especially of France, the 
 only one whose action in favour of Spain could be 
 decisive." 
 
 The demand was not unlooked-for. M. de 
 Rayneval had announced it to us, supported by all 
 the arguments his own personal convictions could 
 suggest; and before we received it, the Duke de 
 Broglie, in a despatch of the 23rd of May 1835, had 
 forewarned the King's ambassador of our answer, by 
 explaining to him the motives which opposed the
 
 110 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 intervention. ^ Called upon for a positive resolution, 
 we had not only to debate the question ourselves, but 
 to concert on the point with England ; for the treaty of 
 the Quadruple Alliance, in the same article appealed to 
 by Spain, expressly declared that, " In case the co- 
 02:>eration of France should be judged necessary by 
 the high contracting parties, to obtain completely the 
 object of this treaty, His Majesty the King of the 
 French engages to act in this respect as may be 
 decided in common accord between him and his three 
 august allies." 
 
 Thus explicitly laid down, the question was scrupu- 
 lously debated, both in the assembled council and in 
 our private interviews. M. Thiers explained with 
 his characteristic eloquence, at once natural and in- 
 genious, the reasons which decided him in favour of 
 intervention. I remarked to him, on one occasion, 
 " Your reasons are strong ; I comprehend that either 
 line of conduct might be adopted." Subsequently, in 
 one of the great debates m the Chamber of Deputies 
 on this subject, M. Thiers asked me from the tribune 
 if I permitted him to repeat these words? "Un- 
 doubtedly," I replied; and he then repeated them. 
 I have nothing to add to-day to the explanation I 
 then gave. " I m no sense withdraw those expres- 
 sions," I said ; " the Chamber wiU readily under- 
 stand that, dreading at that epoch, in the interior 
 of the cabmet, a separation I never sought, and 
 shall always regret, I have never used in my private 
 conversations or elsewhere, any language but such as 
 
 ' See Historic Documents, No. V.
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. Ill 
 
 seemed to me calculated to prevent it. I shall add that 
 my opinion on this question has not been from the 
 first day complete and absolute, like that of others ; 
 it has formed and strengthened itself progressively 
 and in presence of passing events. But the honour- 
 able member, M. Thiers, knows, as well as any one, or 
 as I do myself, that whenever it has become necessary 
 to adopt a resolution, to pronounce either for or 
 against intervention, I have declared against it. 
 This is the only fact that I desire to establish at 
 this moment." 
 
 It is agreeable to me to recall this to-day. The 
 leading argument set forward in 1835 and 1836, by 
 the partisans of intervention was, that without that 
 aid the crown of Queen Isabella, and of the con- 
 stitutional system in Spain would be lost. Twenty- 
 five years have since rolled on, twenty-five years of 
 severe trials for Spain; no intervention has taken 
 place, and Spain has not required it; she has saved 
 herself. A great security for her future, as well as 
 a subject for legitimate pride. Amongst her friends, 
 these who hoped the most from her are not those 
 who knew her the least. 
 
 From the first day. King Louis-Philippe was, in 
 his Council, one of the most decided against inter- 
 vention ; and to speak the truth, it was his solicitude 
 for France, rather than his hopes for Spain, by which 
 he was influenced. " Let us assist the Spaniards 
 externally," he said to me; "but let us not embark 
 in their vessel. If we ever do so, we must take the 
 helm, and God knows what will then happen to us !
 
 112 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 Napoleon failed to conquer Spain, and Louis XYIII. 
 to win the people back from their disorders. I know 
 them ; they are not to be subdued or governed by 
 foreigners. They call for us to-day; we shall scarcely 
 arrive amongst them when they will abhor and im- 
 pede us by every means in their power. Do you 
 remember Rajnievars despatch, in which, while 
 preaching intervention to us, he pointed out the in- 
 e\itable accompaniments. It would be necessary, he 
 said, tliat the French army, to consolidate its work, 
 should occupy for more or less time the country it had 
 pacified, without which the flame would indubitably 
 burst forth anew.* And have you not told me that the 
 Duke de Frias informed you himself, Avithin the last 
 few days, that the intervention of France in Spain 
 would avail nothing, if not followed by an occupa- 
 tion of four or five years at least? Trust me, my 
 dear minister, let us not employ our army in this 
 interminable work, or open this gulf for our finances ; 
 let us not set this cannon-ball on foot in Europe. If 
 the Spaniards are to be saved, it must be their own 
 work; they alone can do it. If we encumber our. 
 selves \\dth the burden, they will place it exclusively 
 on our shoulders, and then render it impossible to be 
 borne." 
 
 The reply of the English cabinet to the Spanish 
 government furnished an additional argument to the 
 opponents of intervention. I find the text in a 
 despatch from M. de Rayneval of the 13th of June, 
 1835 : — "A courier arrived here from London yester- 
 
 1 Despatch of the 22ud of May, 1835.
 
 EXTERNAI. POLICY. 113 
 
 day evening ■vvith despatches from the Spanish Le- 
 gation. Their import is, that the English cabinet 
 declines the request of co-operation made by the 
 Queen's government to her allies; that it does not, 
 however, oj^pose the assistance which France, in her 
 own name, might wish to afford to Spam ; but that it 
 has no desire to hold itself responsible m any manner 
 for such a measure, which might compromise the 
 general repose of Europe." 
 
 I do not believe that the last consideration was 
 sincere, or the true reason for the refusal of the 
 Enghsh cabinet. If France and England had con- 
 curred in supporting Queen Isabella with their armies 
 against the insurgents, the Northern Powers would 
 assuredly not have despatched theirs to the aid of 
 Don Carlos. But be the motive what it might, the 
 course adopted by England of leaving the weight of 
 the responsibility of intervention exclusively on 
 France, could not fail to influence our decision. The 
 Duke de Broglie transmitted it to M. de Rayneval on 
 the 8th of June, adding to his official despatch a 
 private letter in these terms : " Our answer to the 
 demand of Spain is precisely what I have announced 
 to you. We have laid the question before the 
 English government in the sunplest terms, and in 
 perfect good faith, and without making any effort to 
 bias its determination. The refusal is positive. We 
 have allowed time here for the expression of public 
 opmion. Through a concurrence of particular cir- 
 cumstances we are willing to excite rather than abate 
 it : of this, the articles in the ' Journal des Debats,' 
 
 VOL. IV. I
 
 114 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 bear testimony. ^ The entire press, mth this excep- 
 tion, declared openly against intervention, and on this 
 occasion found itself the organ of the public in 
 general. We finally sounded individual opinions in 
 the Chambers. There were not twenty members who 
 "wished to hear the measure spoken of. As soon then 
 as the cabinet became decided and unanunous (and 
 this was not easily accomplished), any attempt of this 
 nature without the concurrence of England, and in 
 opposition to the feeling of the country, would have 
 been a senseless enterprise, which the ascendency of 
 opinion would soon have compelled us to abandon. 
 
 " You will feel no surprise that, in their official 
 conununications, the cabinets of London and Paris 
 have only considered mtervention with regard to the 
 progress of the Carlist rebellion, leaving entirely aside 
 the eventual dangers which may result from revolu- 
 tionary insurrections. We appreciate these dangers 
 at their just value; we are aware that the fears they 
 inspire in the Spanish government are the true cause 
 of the demand addressed to France and England, and 
 that if it had only to deal with Don Carlos, it would 
 endeavour to resist with the forces still at its disposal. 
 But however well grounded such apj^rehensions may 
 be, we could not debate them as the basis of eventual 
 intervention in documents which, according to all 
 appearance, will some day become known to the 
 public. Constitutional governments, governments 
 built on free discussion, could not, on any contin- 
 gency, engage in an intervention, the sole or at least 
 
 1 On the 29th and 31st of May, and 4th and 7th of June, 1835.
 
 EXTERNAL POLICY. 115 
 
 the principal object of which wouki be to maintain 
 one ministry in power in preference to another, and 
 to set aside certain shades of opinion. It would be 
 with great difficulty, the treaty of the 2nd of August, 
 1834, in our hand, that we could justify an inter- 
 vention between the Queen Regent and Don Carlos ; 
 but on no pretext whatever could we justify an inter- 
 vention between M. Martinez de la Kosa and M. Ar- 
 guelles, or M. Galiano." 
 
 The Duke de Broglie was right in dealing with the 
 question thus. Besides the civil war between the 
 party of Queen Isabella and that of the infant Don 
 Carlos, there was an active struggle in progress be- 
 tween M. Martinez de la Rosa and M. ArgueUes; 
 between the Royal statute, and the constitution of 
 1812; or, as we may say, in the very bosom of the 
 adherents and ministry of Queen Isabella herself. 
 We had the means of obtaining, and did obtain, a 
 firmly established opinion of the political merits of 
 the parties who were then struggling for power under 
 the same sceptre. We recognized in the ideas and 
 practices of the radical sections, the deplorable empire 
 of the revolutionary spirit, of its theories and passions ; 
 we desired the success of the moderates, we wished 
 to support them with our influence. While refusing 
 the direct and official intervention they called for, we 
 offered them all the indirect service we could think 
 of; the introduction into Spain of the foreign legion, 
 permission to recruit a free corj)S in France, with sup- 
 plies of arms and ammunition. But neither did the 
 treaty of the Quadruple Alliance command, nor the 
 
 I 2
 
 116 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 principles of public European law and the interests of 
 France permit us to go farther, or to place at the 
 service of that particular party in Spain the soldiers 
 and treasures of our country. After the refusal of 
 intervention, the internal struggle of the Sj^anish 
 ministry eventuated as it was easy to foresee. M. 
 Martinez de la Rosa fell, and for three months his 
 colleague, M. de Toreno, his successor, endeavoured 
 to govern still in the name of the moderate party; 
 but his concessions and attempts at resistance were 
 equally vain; popular outbreaks, revolutionary tu- 
 mults, massacres of monks, and insurrections to the 
 cry of " Long live the constitution of 1812," redoubled 
 in violence. M. de Toreno fell in his turn, and in 
 the month of February 1836, when in France the 
 cabinet of the 11th of October broke up, on the 
 conversion of the funds, — in Spain, the radicals, then 
 represented by M. Mendizabal and his friends, ob- 
 tained possession of power. 
 
 I comprehend the temptations of the policy of fixed 
 ideas and great enterprises, and the impassioned en- 
 joyment which generous spirits may feel in pursuing, 
 at any cost, the success of a design mingled with 
 doubt and evil, but bold and perhaps promising for 
 the future. It is sweet thus to surrender ourselves to 
 our own idea, to strike the imagination of men, and 
 to believe, that in violently changing the face of the 
 world we are ministers of Providence. But this is 
 not the policy of healthy governments, of free people, 
 or of honest men. This latter has for its law, respect 
 for rights, for all rights, the care of the regular
 
 EXTEKNAL POLICY. 117 
 
 and permanent interests of nations, and some degree 
 of scruple as well as of patience in the employment of 
 means. When, after 1830, we were called to act in 
 the affairs of Europe, we were not indifferent to the 
 condition or Avishes of the European states. We 
 knew that there were many wounds to heal, many 
 lawful wants to satisfy. We ourselves had in the 
 question of European reforms our particular ambitions 
 and s}mipathies; and many powerful reminiscences, 
 ma y seductive appearances urged us to give them 
 play. But we could not plunge into these attempts 
 without having at first for ally, and speedily for 
 master, the spirit of revolution, — that poisoner of the 
 fairest of human hopes. Moreover, we felt convinced, 
 that an appeal to force was not the eligible method 
 of accomplishing the really salutary reforms and ad- 
 vances which Europe sighed to obtain. It was our 
 determination to exercise a policy entirely new in the 
 relations of states, — the policy of rational minds and 
 honest people. Masters of great and commanding 
 genius have not been wanting to the world. They 
 have displayed, in governing it, superior faculties, and 
 have changed -with brilliancy the form and aspect of 
 nations. But in this undertaking there have been so 
 many superficial and disproportionate conceptions, so 
 many arbitrary combinations, so much ignorance of 
 social facts and of their natural laws, such a multipli- 
 cation of egotistical and capricious desires, that just 
 doubts have arisen, after these leaders have departed, 
 on the definitive merit of what they have thought and 
 done; and then the question has been reasonably asked, 
 
 I 3
 
 118 EXTERNAL POLICY. 
 
 wlictlier tlioy served or led astray the nations whose 
 destinies they controlled. Charles Y., Richelieu, and 
 Peter the Great, have conquered and deserved the ad- 
 miration of history ; yet, nevertheless, when the great 
 light of time and experience is brought to bear on them, 
 the real value of their intentions and deeds appears 
 more and more doubtful, and is more disputed fi'om 
 day to day. How many objections and reproaches are 
 cast up to them in these times ! How many errors, 
 omissions, and fatal consequences do we not discover 
 in their works ! How much mischief mingled with the 
 success which forms their glory ! We were sincerely 
 anxious to avoid such a combination. We desired to 
 infuse more discretion into our enterprises, to judge 
 them ourselves with more severity, and to attempt 
 nothing that would not bear a rigid scrutiny and a 
 lengthened trial. I admit that in the estimation of 
 spectators as well as of actors, this policy is less seduc- 
 tive than that of the ordinary class of distinguished 
 men; and that by interdicting improvident abstrac- 
 tions and popular empiricisms, it aggravates for the 
 moment the difficulties, already so formidable, attached 
 to the government of states. But to achieve in this 
 world a certain and lasting good, avc must take into 
 the account, justice, Hberty, and time. This confi- 
 dence, both internally and externally, formed the 
 basis of our conduct. I see nothing to regret in it, 
 even after our reverses.
 
 119 
 
 CHAPTER 11. 
 
 DISMEMBERMENT OF THE GOVERNMENT PARTY. 
 
 MY SITUATION AND DISPOSITION AFTER THE BREAKING UP OF THE 
 
 CABINET OF THE IItH OF OCTOBER, 1832. MY PARTICIPATION IN 
 
 THE DEBATES OF THE CHAMBERS FROM THE 22nD OF FEBRUARY TO 
 
 THE 6tH of SEPTEMBER, 1836. MY ELECTION TO THE FRENCH 
 
 ACADEMY. M. DE TRACY, MY PREDECESSOR. MY INAUGURAL 
 
 DISCOURSE. THE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES AND BELLES-LETTRES OP 
 
 STOCKHOLM, AND THE KING OF SWEDEN, CHARLES JOHN. DEATHS 
 
 OF THE ABBE SIEYES AND OF M. CARNOT. DEATH OF M. A3IPERE ; HIS 
 
 CHARACTER. DEATH OF M. ARMAND CARREL ; HIS CHARACTER. 
 
 ACQUISITION AND DESCRIPTION OF VAL-RICHER. THE ARCHBISHOP 
 
 OF CANTERBURY, THOMAS A BECKET, AT VAL-RICHER IN THE 12tH 
 
 CENTURY. SITUATION OF M. THIERS IN 1836. ATTEMPT TO 
 
 ASSASSINATE KING LOUIS-PHILIPPE BY ALIBAUD. AFFAIRS OP 
 
 SPAIN ; M. MENDIZABAL, AND HIS DISPOSITIONS TOWARDS FRANCE. 
 
 THE ENGLISH CABINET PROPOSES INTERVENTION IN SPAIN. THE 
 
 FRENCH CABINET REJECTS THE OVERTURE. DESPATCHES OF M. DE 
 
 RAYNEVAL ON THIS SUBJECT. REVOLUTIONARY MOVEMENTS IN SPAIN 
 
 FOR THE CONSTITUTION OF 1812. M. ISTURITZ SUCCEEDS M. MEN- 
 DIZABAL. GENERAL QUESADA, GOVERNOR OF MADRID; HIS ENERGY. 
 
 MEASURES ADOPTED BY THE FRENCH GOVERNMENT TOWARDS SPAIN. 
 
 MISSION OF M. DE BOIS-LE-COMTE TO MADRID. MILITARY INSUR- 
 RECTION OF SAINT ILDEFONSO. COURAGE AND USELESS RESISTANCE 
 
 OF QUEEN CHRISTINA. EFFECTS OF THIS INSURRECTION AT MADRID. 
 
 GENERAL QUESADA IS MASSACRED. PR0CLA3IATI0N OF THE CON- 
 STITUTION OF 1812. DISAGREEMENTS IN THE FRENCH CABINET ON 
 
 THE QUESTION OF INTERVENTION IN SPAIN. KING LOUIS-PHILIPPE 
 
 AND M. THIERS. RETIREMENT OF THE CABINET OF THE 22nD OP 
 
 FEBRUARY, 1836. 
 
 {Fro7)i February '^'ind, to September Gth, 1836.) 
 
 I HAVE been attached to power, yet I never escaped 
 from it without a sentiment of satisfaction, and almost 
 
 I 4
 
 120 DISMEMBERMENT OF THE 
 
 of joy; like a laborious student who enters on his 
 vacation, or a man who breathes freely when de- 
 livering himself from a heavy burthen. A profound 
 melancholy seized me when, on the 22nd of February, 
 1836, I again entered that small house no longer 
 accompanied by her who had recently filled it with 
 happiness ; but it was our own, replete with cherished 
 remembrances, and I there recovered repose and 
 liberty, — powerful charms after years of labour and 
 combat. It is the privilege of the human heart to 
 admit at the same moment the most opposing feelings, 
 without regard to disagreement or inconsistency. 
 
 I experienced another satisfaction, more superficial 
 but not indifferent. The public applauded my friends 
 and myself for ha\ang resigned office rather than 
 submit to a check and an embarrassed position. 
 The reduction of the funds was extremely unpopular 
 in Paris. It was the opposition and the third party 
 who had carried the motion in the Chamber of Depu- 
 ties. Behind the debates, an intrigue was suspected. 
 The appearances of intrigue follow rapidly in the 
 wake of success, even Avhen success has not been 
 thereby decided, and it is dangerous to rise by a 
 defeat in Avhich you have participated. General 
 tokens of esteem and sympatliy attended us in our 
 retirement. I remained at home on the Thursday 
 evenings. The English ambassadress, Lady Grenville 
 and her niece the Duchess of Sutherland, found it 
 difficult, on one occasion, to penetrate into the small 
 saloon whei:e my mother received visitors with a 
 simple and earnest gravity, which inspired interest
 
 GOVERNMENT PARTY. 121 
 
 while commanding respect. Even those amongst our 
 friends who regretted our determination, admitted the 
 good effect of it for ourselves. From as far off as St. 
 Petersburg, M. de Barante wrote to me : " I hesitate 
 to affirm that this step was not necessary, but I grieve 
 for the result. Serious, steady, and consistent men, of 
 great talent and exalted fame, are to be regretted at 
 aU times, and it does not appear to me that we have 
 reached the point of losing them without damage 
 or danger. The danger you diminish by a con- 
 duct I foresaw; you render possible the ministry 
 which succeeds you, and you do not leave it the 
 temptation of departing from your policy, although 
 exposed by its position to that course. M. Thiers is 
 a man of sound sense, talent, and courage, but I fear 
 he cannot long maintam his equilibrium, and that, 
 whether he will or no, he may find it difficult to 
 make a movement. His reason, I imagine, has had a 
 strong combat with his dream of ambition. He has 
 said this freely, and in truth I beheve him. Exter- 
 nally, as yet, I perceive no effect, and I feel no 
 anxiety. The position is excellent, devoid of actual 
 dano;er: and even without the earnest assurances of 
 M. Thiers, I felt convinced that I should receive no 
 different instructions from hun. Every body writes 
 to me of the part you take in the Chamber, of the 
 influence you hold there, of a consideration still in- 
 creasing. I congratulate myself on this, and my 
 friendship is proud of it. I know not what unforeseen 
 events and the fluctuations of coteries in the Chamber 
 may reserve for you, but I am sure you will neither
 
 122 DISMEMBERMENT OF THE 
 
 be impatient nor ardent. Many opinions and even 
 some passions are exhausted ; let us hope that envy- 
 may become as much depreciated and weary. It is 
 the venom of the worst days of the revolution ; the 
 beast is dead, but not the poison." 
 
 I quote these friendly words without hesitation. I 
 should cease to write these Memoirs if I felt any 
 difficulty in saying what appears to me true, and 
 fitted to convey a just idea of the times and situa- 
 tions. 
 
 I held the same opinion with M. de Barante before 
 he communicated his to me ; feeling persuaded that 
 M. Thiers would exert himself to maintain the policy 
 we had carried on together, and resolving to do 
 nothing that might perplex him. During the course 
 of the session, from the month of February to July 
 1836, I took part in only three debates, and on occa- 
 sions when I could not abstain ; but it is not in the 
 power of man to suppress the consequences of facts, 
 and in free governments there is no skill or prudence 
 which can prevent truth from coming to light. It 
 soon became evident that the cabinet of the 11th of 
 October, 1832, was necessary to the maintenance of 
 its policy, and that its dismemberment entrained that 
 of the party in government which had rallied under 
 its flag. 
 
 It was on the question of the secret supplies called 
 for by the new cabinet that the first unportant debate 
 arose. My friends and myself were fully resolved to 
 vote them without objection, as in fact we did ; but 
 the new supporters of M. Thiers, the men of the old
 
 GOVERNMENT PARTY. 123 
 
 opposition, wlietlier from the left or third party, stren- 
 uously maintained, some that they would not vote 
 these supplies until the policy they had disputed 
 should be effectually modified, — others, that if they 
 did vote them, they reckoned on that modification, 
 which they considered natural and inevitable; some 
 evinced their fears that the new cabmet would merely 
 perpetuate the old one; others, their hope, that being 
 differently constructed, it would act in another spirit ; 
 and all indulged in doubts, commentaries, and com- 
 parisons with reference to the past, while demanding 
 explanations as to the future. The debate, in truth, 
 was merely an attack somewhat restrained on the 
 policy of resistance, with cajolmg advances towards 
 that of concession. In the midst of these uncertain 
 glunmermgs I spoke, not to discuss the secret sup- 
 plies, not to add my own doubts to all these contra- 
 dictory objections, but to replace in full light the 
 policy which my friends and I had sustained since 
 1830, and to extract, not from any personal polemic, 
 but from a true picture of facts, the demonstration of 
 its practical necessity as of its moral legitimacy, in 
 the actual condition of our country. " Progress is 
 talked of," I said; "progress does not consist in 
 marching blindly in the same sense, in the same 
 track ; true progress for society is to obtain what it 
 requires when society has fallen into licence. Pro- 
 gress is to return towards order, when certain ideas 
 have been abused. Progress is to retreat from the 
 abuse which has thus been indulged in. I do not 
 slander our past: yes, we have had revolutions, in-
 
 124 DISMEMBERMENT OF THE 
 
 evitable, necessary, and glorious; but after forty 
 years of revolutions, after so many and such notable 
 explosions of revolutionary principles, habits, and 
 practices, our France requires to establish, to secure 
 herself on the ground she has conquered, to enlighten 
 and organize herself, to revive the principles of order 
 and preservation she has so long lost. Such is the 
 true progress to Avliich she aspires. I do not conceive 
 it to be any wrong to our illustrious predecessors, to 
 our fathers of 1789 and 1791, not to pursue to-day 
 the path in which they trod. I go even farther ; I 
 doubt not, but that in their unknown abode, those 
 noble souls who desired so much good to humanity, 
 experience a profound joy in seeuig us avoid the 
 rocks on which they shattered so many of their 
 brightest hopes." 
 
 The chamber was moved by these words. M. 
 Odilon Barrot answered me with moderation and 
 dignity, but not Avithout suffering the embarrassment 
 of recent alliances to mingle with his speech ; for he 
 decidedly announced his opposition to the line of 
 policy which the new cabinet he seemed inclined to 
 support, declared itself resolved to maintain. M. de 
 Montalivet and M. Sauzet alone took part in the 
 debate. M. Thiers preserved silence. He had too 
 much political tact not to feel the necessity of simple 
 positions, and he had little inclination to exhibit him- 
 self in the complicated part he had so recently ac- 
 cepted. Free governments introduce amongst parties 
 and persons many manoeuvres and metamorj^hoses : 
 but they render them difficult and burdensome, at
 
 GOVEENMENT PAETY. 125 
 
 the very moment of introduction, even for the actors 
 who may succeed in their accomplishment. 
 
 Some time after this debate, I had, beyond the 
 Chambers, a new and natural opportunity of bringing 
 into light, at a moment when it seemed a little veiled, 
 the policy which, since 1830, I had ever practised 
 myself, and maintained while supporting the ministers. 
 My friends of the departmental division which I re- 
 presented were anxious to give me, while I no longer 
 held office, a public testunony of their unflinching 
 approbation. On the 10th of April, 1836, they met 
 together at Lisieux, at a banquet to which the Duke 
 de Broglie was also invited. In thanking them for 
 their faithful support, I enjoyed the satisfaction of 
 laying before them what for six years had been and 
 ought to continue for the future, that policy of mode- 
 ration and resistance, in the bosom of liberty, which 
 in the time of Henry IV., as in our own days, had 
 received and merited the name of the policy of the 
 just medium {juste milieu). It is in this speech, and 
 in that which I have just referred to on the demand 
 for secret supplies, that, if I do not deceive myself, I 
 gave the most complete and animated summary of the 
 conduct, which in my idea, was most suitable to our 
 government, of its rational and incidental motives, 
 of its moral and practical merit. I was at that 
 time unconnected with the cabinet ; I had no parti- 
 cular act to defend, no pressing polemic to sustain ; I 
 spoke with unfettered freedom, with no other care 
 than that of my own thought, and the desire of 
 making it thoroughly understood, almost Avith the
 
 126 DISMEMBERMENT OF THE 
 
 same sentiment which I bring to-day into my remi- 
 niscences. 
 
 I was in favour with the Chamber ; my attitude 
 and language pleased the majority. I faithfully ad- 
 vocated what it had thought and done without sug- 
 gesting any new effort, any new struggle. Occasions 
 were readily embraced to evince its sympathy with 
 me. The committee of the budget had proposed in 
 the monetary department of the ministry of public 
 instruction, several amendments ; it wished to multi[)ly 
 the number of chapters, to impose on the minister ties 
 of more rigorous specialit}^. It demanded that the 
 copies of the works to. which this minister subsci'ibed^ 
 for their encouragement, should only be distributed 
 to libraries, or other public establishments, never to 
 simple individuals. The gifts which I had made of 
 these were charged with favour and abuse. I opposed 
 both amendments. I urged the inconvenience of 
 shackling the administration within rules too tightly 
 dra'wii, which at a later period unforeseen facts might 
 often place it under the necessity of infringing ; unless 
 to the detriment of the public interest, these facts 
 were ignored and held of no account. I entered into 
 precise details on the individual distribution I had 
 made of works acquired by subscription, and I vehe- 
 mently protested, in the name of science and literature, 
 against the interdiction sought to be pronounced. De- 
 spite the efforts of the reporters of the budget and their 
 friends, the Chamber sided with me, and rejected the two 
 amendments ; my arguments weighed with the house, 
 and it had confidence in me in such matters. More-
 
 GOVERNMENT PAETY. 127 
 
 over, it felt satisfaction in an expression of good will 
 towards one of the most faithful representatives of 
 its policy, and in an act of independence as re- 
 garded the new cabinet, which it supported more 
 from conviction than inclination. If I had continued 
 a minister, I should perhaps not have obtained the 
 same success. 
 
 The debate on the aifairs of Algeria was the third 
 and last occasion on which I spoke during this session, 
 and I availed myself of it to support the demand for 
 men and money originating with the cabinet. From 
 the beginning I had taken a lively interest in this 
 question. When doubts had been raised as to the 
 retention of our conquest, I had repulsed them 
 with my utmost power; and in 1836, on the approach 
 of a new discussion, the colonists already settled in 
 Algeria wrote to me in token of confidence, and re- 
 quested me once more to take their cause in hand. ^ 
 I needed not this incentive to demand, in the interest 
 of our establishment, all the troops and resources 
 necessary for its security and prosperity. But what 
 had happened at several repetitions, in Algeria, since 
 1830, with the opinion I had formed of the arrange- 
 ments of the governor-general in 1836, Marshal 
 Clauzel, a distinguished soldier rather than a fore- 
 casting politician and administrator, inspired me with 
 some anxiety, and I felt called upon to explaui my- 
 self before the Chamber. " There is," said I, " a line 
 of conduct which I must permit myself to call restless, 
 warlike, anxious to advance too quickly or too far, and 
 
 ^ See Historic Documents, No. VI.
 
 128 DISJIEMBERMENT OF THE 
 
 to extend abruptly, by force or stratagem, the French 
 rule, the official French rule, over all the districts and 
 tribes of the old Kegency. There is another line, less 
 restless and warlike, slower and more pacific, the object 
 of which should be to establish the authority of France 
 firmly over certain portions of the territory, over 
 those which were the most closely appropriated in the 
 first days of our occupation ; and for that reason, being 
 desirous of entertaining friendly relations with the 
 natives, would not immediately disturb them on the 
 question of their independence, and would make no war 
 on them except through compulsion, in case of absolute 
 necessity. I believe that the state of Africa, the state 
 of France, and the state of Europe, every imaginable 
 reason, reject the first mode of proceeding, the rest- 
 less and aggressive line; and recommend deliberate, 
 pacific, and moderate measures." I know not whether 
 M. Thiers saw anything in my words which touched 
 him personally, or if he felt himself compelled to 
 shield Marshal Clauzel, to whom alone my doubts ap- 
 plied. Be that as it may, he replied to me at once, 
 not without some impatience, calling upon me to ex- 
 plain, with more precision, the substance of my coun- 
 sels, which he called lessons. I defended myself thus : 
 " I have never pretended," I said, " and never shall 
 pretend to give lessons here to any one ; the words 
 which fall from this tribune are not lessons. We 
 deliver our opinions with perfect freedom, our opinions, 
 and nothing more." I remembered that while I was 
 in the cabinet, and at the very moment when the 
 governor-general of Algeria received its instructions.
 
 GOVERNMENT PARTY. 129 
 
 I had spoken in the same strain. Marshal Clauzel 
 delivered a few guarded words on the course he 
 intended to adopt, and the debate proceeded no 
 farther. 
 
 The session closed ; no other opportunity of discord 
 between the various elements of the opposition pre- 
 sented itself; but it was evident that there was no 
 longer union amongst them; mistrusts, discontents, 
 and mutual skirmishes developed themselves from day 
 to day, and the mischief, though checked, Avas felt by 
 the public as in the Chambers, externally as well as 
 in the heart of the country. " Your position is noble 
 and great," M. de Barante wrote to me from St. 
 Petersburg; " your speeches have never been more 
 weighty, or more seriously attended to ; not only in 
 the Chamber, but from one end of Europe to the 
 other; and even here, where little attention is be- 
 stowed on our internal policy: and yet, how will 
 all this end? How will a combination re-adjust itself 
 which was still necessary? A combination not alone 
 confined to particular persons and names." M. de 
 Barante had reason for his anxiety. The great 
 government party, which had been formed in the 
 cabinets of the 13th of March 1831, and of the 11th of 
 October 1832, and which constituted their strength, 
 floated in doubt and dislocation. 
 
 A happy literary incident at this epoch diverted my 
 mind and thoughts from political j)re-occupation. A 
 seat became vacant in the French Academy: M. de 
 Tracy died on the 9th of March 1836, and I was 
 elected to replace him on the 18th of April. No 
 
 VOL. IV. K
 
 130 DISMEMBERMENT OF THE 
 
 competitor offered himself to contest this honour. 
 Out of twenty-nine academicians present at the sit- 
 ting, twenty-seven gave me their voices : there were 
 two blank votes. 
 
 The duty which this success imposed on me was 
 almost as agreeable as the success itself. Without 
 any intimate acquaintance Avith M. de Tracy, I had 
 often met him in the world, at the house of Madame 
 de Rumford amongst others, and I had said to myself 
 more than once, that it would gratify me to succeed 
 him in the Academy, and on that ground to be called 
 on to speak of him and his time. This noble old man, 
 the sincere and consistent friend of universal justice, 
 of political liberty, of all the rights and hopes of his 
 fellow-creatures, invariably faithful to his ideas and 
 his friends, had become, at the close of his life, melan- 
 choly, morose, retired Avithin himself, cold, and ap- 
 parently indifferent to that future of the humanity 
 which had so constantly engaged his thoughts.' " I 
 am no longer of this world," he said, with some bit- 
 terness ; " what passes there concerns me no more." 
 I saw in him a worthy representative and a striking 
 image of the age in Avhich he had lived, and had seen 
 teraiinate in the midst of such cruel trials and lament- 
 able errors. Lately, when I had the honour of pre- 
 siding at the French Academy for the reception of my 
 learned friend, M. Biot, I endeavoured to characterise the 
 eighteenth century by calling it "an age of spnpathy, 
 and of young and presumptuous confidence, but sin- 
 cere and human, whose sentiments were more valuable 
 than its principles and manners; which failed greatly,
 
 GOVERNMENT PARTY. 131 
 
 because it had too much faith in itself, and mistrusted 
 everything else ; but for which it may be permitted 
 to hope, that when its faults shall seem to be suffi- 
 ciently expiated, much may be pardoned, because it 
 has so intensely loved." In 1836, I bore towards that 
 distinguished epoch, the last survivors of which had 
 received me in social life with such generous good will, 
 the same sentiments which I subsequently expressed in 
 1857; and the memory of M. de Tracy appeared to 
 me the most favourable opportunity that could occur 
 of judging it with independence, or of depicting it 
 with grateful respect. 
 
 This was the object and character of the discourse 
 I delivered on the 22nd of December, 1836, before 
 the Academy, when I had the honour of being ad- 
 mitted a member. On reading it to-day, I find it 
 true and just in the estimate of the eighteenth 
 century, of its philosophical doctrines and social in- 
 fluence, of what it was in itself, and of what it has done 
 for its successors. But this discourse did not receive, 
 either in the Academy or on publication, the full 
 sympathy I had expected. The philosophic school of 
 the eighteenth century was still numerous and power- 
 ful, and had for representatives, as usually happens 
 when schools become old, no longer its great leaders, 
 but some of their most intractable disciples. These 
 parties were opposed to the rising spiritualistic and 
 religious philosophy ; and to philosophical controver- 
 sies were united political and literary dissensions which 
 greatly aggravated their bitterness. Minds thus dis- 
 posed found my discourse dry, and even harsh, as 
 
 K 2
 
 132 DISMEMBEmiENT OF THE 
 
 regarded the eighteenth century, its principles and 
 masters. It was, they said, a discourse purely doctri- 
 narian. It was, in fact, too much so for the moment 
 and the place where it was delivered ; perhaps, also, 
 in the physiognomy of the ideas and the fornis of the 
 language. Emancipated from the arena of politics, I 
 felt a secret pleasure in no longer living ^vithin it, in 
 caiing for no adversaries, and in giving myself up 
 entirely to my own train of thought, as if I spoke 
 for myself alone. On that day I forgot too entirely 
 the struggles I had to maintain elsewhere, and the cau- 
 tion necessary to be observed when speaking, in respect 
 to the prejudices and tastes of those who listen. 
 
 On the same day I met, in requital, with a piece of 
 good fortune, far su2:)erior to the somewhat common- 
 place gratification of the academic compliments. The 
 Academy was presided over by one of the most ex- 
 cellent spirits and generous hearts it had ever enume- 
 rated in its ranks, Count Philip de S^gur, devoted 
 like myself to historical studies, and in political life 
 one of my staunchest friends. He spoke of me in 
 terms which I cannot re-peruse to-day without feeling 
 intensely the value and charm of the friendship which 
 inspired them. 
 
 Two years after my introduction into the French 
 Academy, the Academy of Historical Sciences, Anti- 
 quities, and Belles-Lettres of Stockholm did me the 
 honour of electing me a member ; and I received, on 
 that occasion, a letter from a man who, in our days 
 of strange destinies, has accomplished one of the 
 most singular as well as of the most illustrious ; — from
 
 GOVERNMENT PARTY. 133 
 
 Charles John, King of Sweden, with whom I had 
 never held the slightest communication. I insert 
 the letter here as a curious specimen of the original 
 and emphatically conciliating turn of mind of this 
 regal soldier of fortune, who, while occasionally yield- 
 ing to the most chunerical ambition, still contrived 
 to maintain himself and establish his dynasty on the 
 throne to which popular election had called him. He 
 wrote to me thus, on the 8th of June 1838 : — 
 
 "Monsieur Guizot, 
 
 " When I sanctioned your nomination as a 
 member of the Academy of Historical Sciences, Anti- 
 quities, and Belles-Letters of Stockholm, I yielded to 
 the natural desire of my soul in expressing the satis- 
 faction I felt at the choice. Those who read your 
 works will applaud the words I uttered ; and I, 
 Monsieur Guizot, congratulate myself that chance and 
 my own conviction have furnished me with the oppor- 
 tunity of making known to those who were near me at 
 that moment, the tribute of esteem with which you 
 have inspired me, and to which you have so many titles. 
 
 " Yours very affectionate, 
 
 " Charles John." 
 
 The year 1836 saw expire with M. de Tracy, 
 several men whose names, on different grounds, have 
 acquired and will retain a celebrity equal to his own : 
 two of his contemporaries, the Abbe Sieyes and 
 M. Carnot; and belonging to our ovni generation, the 
 great philosophic physician M. Ampere, and M. Ar- 
 
 K 3
 
 134 DISMEMBERIMENT OF THE 
 
 mand Carrel. I liad no personal knowledge of the 
 first two, and I shall abstain from expressing, as re- 
 gards them, my full opinion. It might perhaps be 
 considered too severe, both on their genius and on the 
 acts of their lives. Times of revolution are times of 
 idolatry as well as of hatred; many men enjoy, we 
 know, much more reputation than they deserve, and 
 commit deeds worse than they are themselves; and 
 when they are only judged by public report and ap- 
 pearances, there is great risk of running into puerile 
 admiration or of condemning with excessive rigour. 
 But I was well acquainted with M. Amj^ere and 
 M. Armand Carrel, and in referring to them I am sure 
 to speak without borrowed prejudice and according to 
 my own judgment. I have no intention of painting 
 and estimating them here at full length ; but I am 
 anxious to name of each what particularly struck me 
 in them, and what, in my idea, were the essential fea- 
 tures of their superiority. M. Ampere possessed one, 
 which has ever been rare, and seems to become more 
 so; he bore to science an unaffected and unlimited 
 love, purified from all personal prepossession, from 
 vanity, as from the desire of wealth. He was an im- 
 passioned scholar and scrutinizer of nature, of her 
 laws and secrets ; and nature, to him, was not entirely 
 confined to what he could see with his eyes and touch 
 ■with his hands, nor even to the abstract labours of 
 his mind. This perfect geometrician, this inventive 
 physician, believed in the moral as well as in the 
 material world, and studied the human soul with as 
 much ardour nnd faith as he did the combinations
 
 GOVERNMENT PARTY. 135 
 
 of molecules or figures. I once found myself in com- 
 pany with him and an illustrious rival, Sir Humphrey 
 Davy, who was making a short stay in Paris. M. Cu- 
 vier and M. Royer-Collard were of the party. After 
 talking on various sul)jects, the conversation turned 
 to philosophical questions, especially to the founda- 
 tions of psychology and morality. Sir Humphrey 
 Davy and M. Ampere joined in it with warm in- 
 terest; but Sir Humphrey was evidently animated 
 with the desire of showing himself, in presence of his 
 learned friends, as profound a metaphysician as he 
 was an able chemist ; vanity seemed to have a very 
 considerable share in the taste he exhibited for philo- 
 sophic inquiry. M. Amjjcre, on the contrary, gave 
 himself up to it in conversation, as in his cabinet, 
 with the most disinterested passion, solely desirous of 
 discovering truth ; and when he believed he had dis- 
 covered it, of making it understood and acknowledged, 
 without the slightest idea of aiming at personal ad- 
 miration. A truly simple mind and a fertile genius, 
 which sought light everywhere, — in the celestial as in 
 the terrestrial regions, — for the sole pleasure of con- 
 templating and expanding it. 
 
 The orio-inal and remarkable character of M. 
 Armand Carrel had this peculiar feature, that he was 
 capable of being quite different from what he really 
 was, and of doing the opposite of what he really did. 
 Not that I hold slightly the powers he loved and 
 served, — the republic, the democracy, and the press. 
 Apart from the strength they possess in our days, 
 there is, in the ideas and sentiments which those 
 
 K 4
 
 136 DISMEMBERMENT OF THE 
 
 names awaken, a large measure of truth and grandeur. 
 But M. Armand Carrel embodied in himself more than 
 a republican, a democrat, and a journalist. I was in 
 relation Avith him at two periods, and on very different 
 occasions. I had given little attention to his early 
 writings, and his History of the Counter-revolution 
 in England under Charles II. and James II. was 
 not calculated to give me an exalted idea of his 
 historical lights. In 1828, when I commenced pub- 
 lishing the Revue Franqaise (French Review), he 
 called to see me, and brought me two articles on the 
 state of Spain and the French expedition to that 
 country in 1823, which were inserted in the miscellany. 
 I and the public were equally struck by the for- 
 cible justice and impartial freedom of mind, as also 
 by the clear and resolute ability therein displayed by 
 the author, — recently a conspiring emigrant and 
 actor in that brief episode. His frank and dignified 
 demeanour pleased me, moreover, as much as his 
 ability. In 1830, during the very days of July, I 
 saw M. Carrel several times, and after the revolution 
 was accomplished, as Minister of the Interior, I sent 
 him to the departments of the west, with a com- 
 mission to observe their condition, and to carry to 
 them words of equity and peace. His reports during 
 his journey were replete with sagacity and mode- 
 ration. When he returned to Paris, I offered him a 
 prefecture, to which I had already appointed him. 
 He refused, from two motives ; one, of personal 
 position, which he avowed to me ; the other, of 
 wounded pride, which he withheld. He was dis-
 
 GOVEENMENT PARTY. 137 
 
 gusted at not being placed in the career of politics, 
 in the same rank with his two eminent companions, 
 M. Thiers and M. Mignet, in the contests which Le 
 National had sustained. I was wrong in not perceiv- 
 ing on the instant the secret wound, which no one 
 amongst the men then in power, and in spite of our 
 momentary embarrassment, would I think have refused 
 to heal. I should regret it still to this day, if I thought 
 that a different situation would have given to the inward 
 dispositions and life of M. Carrel an opposite course : 
 but I cannot believe this. There were in him cleli- 
 ciencies and passions which would ever have prevailed 
 over the influences of his external position, and have 
 thrown him back into the path in which he pre- 
 ferred to tread. This keen observer, who carried 
 into his appreciation of particular facts and the 
 practical views they suggested to him, so much jus- 
 tice and freedom of thought, had no unity of prin- 
 ciple, and extracted not from his constitutional good 
 sense the general ideas which might have been 
 its legitunate produce. This unshackled and sagacious 
 censor of the errors and faults of the party he had 
 embraced from his first steps in life, submitted not 
 the less, and under diverse circumstances, to bear 
 the entire yoke of that party. This character, filled 
 with elevated and generous instincts, but also with 
 impetuous and personal excitements, found neither 
 the rule nor measure of which he stood in need, in 
 wholesome moral conductions. This submissive ad- 
 mirer of military discipline had in his political life 
 a rude taste for independence, and repulsed, with
 
 138 DISMEMBERMENT OF THE 
 
 haughty impatience, superiority, rivahy, obstacles 
 and dekiys. He was an ambitious spirit, who woukl 
 have wished to be carried at once to the top of the 
 ladder, and perhaps might have well sustained his 
 place there, but who could not endure to mount the 
 steps by progressive labour. His resolute spirit failed 
 to preserve him from ebullitions of passion and sallies 
 of temper. Neither could his antipathy to disorder and 
 plebeian rule restrain him from submitting to disor- 
 derly and popular influences. Such were the incidents 
 of position and natural tendencies which determined 
 the lot of M. Carrel ; stifled in him some of his most pre- 
 cious gifts, and made him the noblest and most judi- 
 cious, but also the most powerless and least satisfied of 
 republicans, democrats, and writers in the opposition. 
 A melancholy example of the mischief that may befal 
 an uncommon man, from his time, his party, and his 
 own defects accepted by himself without struggle. 
 M. Armand Carrel wasted in an incoherent, imperfect, 
 sterile, and gloomy life, qualities of character and mind 
 formed to reach and suffice to a destiny more illus- 
 trious for himself and more profitable to his coun- 
 try. According to his friends, he experienced in his 
 lattei" days, and a short time before the lamentable 
 encounter in which he fell, attacks of low spirits, over- 
 flo^\^ng with ennui and sinister presentiments ; — a 
 state of lassitude natural to a man engaged in the 
 course he had followed \\nth sincere passion, but 
 wherein he found, and from day to day hoped less to 
 find, the gratification of liis more wholesome thoughts 
 and nobler inclinations.
 
 GOVERNMENT PARTY. 139 
 
 At this period I took advantage of my political 
 leisure to accomplish a desire I had long formed of 
 acquiring in Normandy, in the midst of a population 
 who for seven years had treated me with so much con- 
 fidence and sympathy, a residence which might become 
 my vacational refuge while I continued in the arena 
 of public life, and my haven of retirement when I 
 finally seceded from it. One of my friends at liisieux 
 took me to see, at a distance of three leagues from 
 the town, the abbey and farm of Val-Richer, then 
 for sale. There remained of the ancient monastery 
 only the abbot's house, not old in itself, for it had 
 been rebuilt towards the middle of the last century. 
 The church adjoining the abbey, and the claustral 
 buildings dependent on it, had been destroyed during 
 the Eevolution. The mansion, solid and spacious, 
 was very imperfectly finished within, and already 
 much dilapidated. Walls, the remnants of earlier 
 constructions, old apple-trees, planted here and there, 
 kitchen gardens, and small washhouses for domestic 
 purposes surrounded it on every side, and even close 
 to the wuidows ; everything had a coarsely rustic and 
 somewhat abandoned air. There was no road by 
 which to reach the place ; it could only be approached 
 on horseback, or by obtaining, through the complai- 
 sance of the neighbours, a passage across their fields. 
 But the locality pleased me. The house, situated 
 half way up a hiU, commanded a narrow, solitary, 
 and silent valley. There was no viUage, not even a 
 roof in sight, but some extremely verdant meadows, 
 bushy thickets sprinkled with lofty trees, a running
 
 140 DISMEMBERMENT OF THE 
 
 stream serpentining through the plain, and a spring 
 of pure and living water close to the house itself. It 
 was a picturesque Avithout being an uncommon land- 
 scape, at once rural and smiling. I promised to 
 myself to furnish the house commodiously, to remove 
 the walls, to form plantations, lawns, slopes, allies, 
 and groves ; to induce the government to open 
 roads, of which the country stood much in need ; — 
 and finally I purchased Val-Richer. 
 
 It was not alone the aspect of the place that 
 attracted me. There was a history attached to it, 
 and great names were mixed up with the traditions 
 of the abbey. It had been originally founded towards 
 the middle of the twelfth century, at first near Vire, 
 from donations given to St. Bernard and to Nivard 
 his brother. Some years later, the monks found this 
 first residence confined and unhealthy ; the monastery, 
 by the aid of new gifts, was removed to the valley 
 called Richer, near Cambremer, a fief dependent on 
 the bishopric of Bayeux; and a disciple of St. Ber- 
 nard, Thomas, monk of Clairvaux, became the first 
 abbot. When, seven hundred years after, I became 
 proprietor of this land and house, which had no longer 
 lord of the soil or monks, an old resident, assistant to 
 the mayor of St. Ouen-le-Paing, the chief place of 
 my township, said to me one day, " Sir, if you ^vish, 
 I ^vill take you to a spot in the woods of Val-Richer 
 where the Saint retired to pray." "What saint?" 
 replied I. " Ah ! I do not know his name, but there 
 was a saint who once dwelt at Yal- Richer, and was 
 accustomed to perform his devotions in the wood, at
 
 GOVEKNIMENT PARTY. 141 
 
 a place still remembered." I questioned some per- 
 sons better informed than the substitute of St. Ouen- 
 le-Paing, and soon discovered, through the most 
 learned Norman archaeologists, that the celebrated 
 Archbishop of Canterbury, Thomas a Becket, during 
 his exile in France, from 1165 to 1170, had visited 
 Lisieux, and from thence proceeded to Val-Kicher, 
 the abbot of which, Robert I., was a friend of his; 
 that he had sojourned there for several months, lead- 
 ing the life of the monks, participating in the same 
 labours and pious exercises ; and that the remains of 
 the ecclesiastical ornaments he used in celebrating 
 the mass had been for a long time preserved.^ Such 
 reminiscences could not be indifferent to a historian 
 who had become a land-owner in Normandy, and they 
 added, in my eyes, an additional charm to my estab- 
 lishment at Yal- Richer. 
 
 In 1836 it was still far fi'om being an establish- 
 ment. Not only would the condition of the house 
 alone prevent this, but the state of public aifairs, and 
 the impending future, glimpses of which revealed 
 themselves, rendered it little probable that I should 
 be able to live beyond the circle of politics, or indulge 
 in a lengthened residence in the country. At the 
 precise moment when I busied myself in the acqui- 
 sition of Val-Richer, the ministry of M. Thiers tot- 
 tered, and observers with but little experience already 
 foretold its fall and successors. 
 
 M. Thiers had attained power with the King's 
 
 1 See Historic Documents, No. VII.
 
 142 DISMEMBERMENT OF THE 
 
 favour, and was accepted with a good grace, I might 
 ahnost say with good-will, by the foreign cabinets 
 and their representatives in Paris. His brilliant, 
 fertile, and flexible mind, the facility of his character, 
 the animation and unreserved freedom of his con- 
 versation, rendered communication with him equally 
 agreeable and accommodating; and nearly all the 
 diplomatists, more especially the ambassadors of 
 Austria and Russia, and the Prussian minister, 
 yielded themselves to it with the eagerness and com- 
 plaisance which resemble seriously premeditated par- 
 tiality. The English ambassador, Lord Granville, 
 was more reserved. He entertained a sincere friend- 
 ship for the Duke de Broglie, and regretted his 
 retirement. I do not think M. Thiers deceived him- 
 self as to the value of these appearances, but they 
 gratified him, nevertheless, and what pleases ever 
 exercises a certain influence. It soon became a 
 generally received notion that the Anglo-French 
 alliance was beginning to cool, and that the govern- 
 ment of King Louis-Philippe inclined towards the 
 great powers of the Continent. The conjecture was 
 superfcial, and grossly exaggerated. M. Thiers, as 
 I think, always continued to attach the same im- 
 portance to the intimacy of France and England; 
 only, in 1836, he believed he had found in the other 
 European cabinets, particularly at Vienna, disposi- 
 tions more favourable than usual ; and he met them 
 graciously in his turn, promising to extract advantage 
 therefrom for the Prince he served, and for his o^vn 
 personal credit.
 
 GOVERNJtIENT PARTY. 143 
 
 But whatever pains were taken, on either side, to 
 prolong and display it, the diplomatic honey-moon 
 endured but for a short space, and led to nothing. 
 Its course was disturbed and curtailed by sundry 
 incidents. In France, in Belgium, and in Switzer- 
 land, the secret revolutionary practices of the political 
 refuo^ees atjainst their old orovernments still continued. 
 This led to the temporary occupation of the republic 
 of Cracow by the three northern powers, and to 
 strong European remonstrances with the federal go- 
 vernment of Switzerland to obtain the expulsion of 
 the conspirators. In both matters, M. Thiers asso- 
 ciated himself with the Prince Metternich, either by 
 manifest concurrence or positive action. In this he 
 only acted in strict conformity with the rules of public 
 law, and the legitimate interests of European order. 
 But this policy, of wliich the English cabinet had 
 no knowledge, excited noisy anger in the French 
 opposition, created unpleasant embarrassments in 
 Switzerland, and failed in producing the expected 
 advantage to the government of King Louis-Phi- 
 lippe. At this period, the Dukes of Orleans and 
 Nemours carried out the visit to Germany projected 
 and prepared under the preceding cabinet. Every- 
 where, in Vienna as in Berlin, from the people and 
 the authorities, their reception was most flattering; 
 but the negotiations officiously entered into for the 
 marriage of the Duke of Orleans with the arch- 
 duchess Maria-Teresa, daughter of the arch-duke 
 Charles, were unsuccessful. The arch-duke exhi- 
 bited no unwillingness; the French ambassador at
 
 144 DISMEMBERMENT OF THE 
 
 Vienna, M. de Ste. Aulaire, who had dissuaded the 
 attempt, exerted himself mth equal tact and zeal 
 for its accomplishment; but the prejudices of the 
 Emperor of Austria, his family, and court, against a 
 government born of the revolution of 1830 proved 
 too strong ; and, despite the guarded reserve on both 
 sides, this diplomatic enterprise, from which M. Thiers 
 had probably expected to derive reputation and future 
 stability for himself and his party, furnished him with 
 nothing but the occasion for a false step at the Tuile- 
 ries and a check in Europe. 
 
 At home, and while the Princes were still absent on 
 their travels, a sinister incident — the attempt of the 
 assassin Alibaud — threw the cabinet into great dis- 
 quietude. On the 25th of June, as the King, accom- 
 panied by the Queen and Madame Adelaide, was pass- 
 ing under the mcket of the Tuileries to return to 
 Neuilly, the end of a cane was placed upon the door of 
 the carriage; a shot was fired; the carriage became 
 filled with smoke ; the ball lodged above the opposite 
 door, and the wadding remained in the King's hair. 
 He was bowing at the moment, to salute the National 
 Guard, who presented arms: tliis accidental motion 
 saved him. The excitement was general and profound. 
 Of what use, then, were all the attempts at conciliating 
 parties — the proclamations of amnesty — the prospec- 
 tive hopes of the policy of concession ? Had new 
 paths been entered on only to encounter in them the 
 same crimes and perils, in addition to the mistake? 
 
 It was said, that in consequence of this abortive 
 crime, a desire was evinced to raise once more the flag
 
 GOVERNJklENT PARTY. 145 
 
 of the policy of resistance ; that overtures were made 
 to call back to the cabinet its most decided represen- 
 tatives; that on this subject I had held an interview 
 with M. Thiers; that the Ministry of Finance had 
 been offered to M. Duchatel; that we had rejected 
 these propositions ; and that I had even left Paris to 
 avoid any further discussion. There was no truth 
 whatever in these assertions, beyond the report of 
 them, which spread abroad, and revealed the trouble 
 by which minds were then possessed. By turns, people 
 promise themselves, from various lines of policy, more 
 than can possibly be accomplished. The policy of 
 resistance had not restrained Fieschi; the policy of 
 concession had no effect on Alibaud. There are blows 
 which no human hand can calculate on warding, and it 
 is not by such incidents that the merits of the maxims 
 and conduct of a o-overnment can be measured. What 
 justly impressed the public in this circumstance was, — 
 the utter emptiness of the confidences and promises of 
 the third party. The cabinet was sensibly weakened, 
 but it was destined to give way before other events, 
 and from different causes. 
 
 At the moment of its formation it found the Spanish 
 government in a most unfavourable vein, both as re- 
 garded Spain herself and her relations with France. 
 In the month of September 1835, the last representa- 
 tive of the moderate party, the Count of Toreno, had 
 fallen, and was succeeded by one of the most unsteady, 
 as well as the boldest, amongst the chiefs of the radicals 
 — M. Mendizabal. Spain then entered on a path which 
 of necessity could only end in the revolutionary re- 
 
 VOL. IV. L
 
 14G DISaiEMBERMENT OF THE 
 
 establishment of the constitution of 1812, and in the 
 diplomatic preponderance of England, formerly the 
 ally and supporter of the authors of that work, essen- 
 tially anarchical, whether ruling over a monarchy or 
 a republic. " The King's government ought not to 
 remain ignorant," the Count de Rayneval wrote to 
 the Duke de Broglie, on the 15tli of September 1835, 
 " that Mr. Villiers has taken a most active part in all 
 the manoeuvi'es which have for their object the removal 
 of M. de Toreno and the triumph of M. de Mendizabal. 
 .... This public support given by the minister of 
 England to a man Avho, in spite of his protestations of 
 moderation and attachment to the Queen and the form 
 of government Spain has received from her, the extreme 
 liberals continue to regard as their leader, has inspired 
 them with the most lively satisfaction. They believe 
 themselves sure of the protection of the British cabinet 
 under any excesses in which they may indulge." 
 Scarcely in possession of power, M. Mendizabal, in fact, 
 assumed openly the attitude of the particular friend 
 1 -wall not say exactly of the- jyrotege, of England. 
 Not only did he reject all idea of French intervention, 
 declaring that he was able to suppress the Carlist in- 
 surrection with the Spanish forces alone, but he went 
 so far as to express an indiscreet malevolence towards 
 France. " Some days since," M. de Rayneval wrote 
 to the Duke de Broglie on the 22nd of September, 
 " two persons who formerly held posts in the adminis- 
 tration, called on him to demand passports for France. 
 He told them that he could have wished not to see 
 them leave Spain at this moment, their departure
 
 GOVERNMENT PARTY. 147 
 
 evincing little confidence in the existing government, 
 but that nevertheless he should not oppose it ; yet as 
 a friend he advised them to go anywhere but to France, 
 for it was possible that -within a very short time the 
 relations of Spain with that country would entirely 
 change their character." This anti-French ostentation 
 did not last long. M. Mendizabal discovered that it 
 injured him materially in Spain, with the nation as with 
 the Cortes ; and, equally fickle and presumptuous, he 
 abruptly changed his attitude and language. " Now," 
 M. de Kayneval wrote on the 15th of November, " this 
 minister, who seemed disposed to do without France 
 altogether, repeats to all the world that it is upon 
 France alone that the firm establishment of the throne 
 of Queen Isabella depends ; that whatever eftbrts the 
 Spanish government may make, it will never bring the 
 civil war entirely to a close unless the French cabinet, 
 while still confining itself within the limits of the 
 stipulations of the Quadruple Alliance, lends it a sin- 
 cere and effectual aid." But this clamorous conver- 
 sion, imposed by necessity, was more apparent than 
 real ; after all, it was upon England that M. Mendizabal 
 relied, being ready to assure her aid by conceding 
 everything that the English cabinet might require. 
 On the 4th of December 1835, M. de Rayneval wrote 
 to the Duke de Broglie : "I have just ascertained 
 with certainty, but under the seal of the most pro- 
 found secresy, that the difiiculty of introducing into, 
 and passing through the Chambers a custom-house 
 bill, has determined M. Mendizabal to conclude a treaty 
 of commerce with England, taking advantage, on this 
 
 I. 2
 
 148 DISMEMBERMENT OF THE 
 
 point, of the latitude wliicli the Eoyal Statute has left 
 to the crown ; that this negotiation is carried on be- 
 tween M. IMendizabal and Mr. Yilliers alone, without 
 letting any of the officials of the Secretary of State's 
 department into the secret; that for the necessary 
 writings they employ a private secretary, whom M. 
 Mendizabal has brought from England ; in fine, that 
 the greater part of the articles are already drawn up, 
 and that M. Mendizabal has ordered the necessary 
 powers to be prepared for signing the act which he 
 has clandestinely arranged. I pray the King's govern- 
 ment to forward to me its instructions on this subject 
 as speedily as possible, and I await your answer with 
 impatience." The answer anticipated the request. 
 Aware, on his part, of the negotiation in progress at 
 Madrid, the Duke de Broglie had, on the 28th of 
 November, instructed M. de Rayneval to remhid M. 
 de Mendizabal that all existing treaties assured to 
 France, in Spain, the treatment of the most favoured 
 nation. The ambassador was called upon to explain 
 to the Spanish minister that it was not merely nominal, 
 but actual equality that we claimed, by equivalents 
 calculated to satisfy French commerce. Finally, he 
 was ordered to announce to him that if commercial 
 arrangements were concluded between England and 
 Spain from which France was excluded, the treaty of 
 the Quadruple AlHance would thereby receive a blow 
 which perhaps Spain would speedily repent. This 
 announcement, solemnly repeated on the 12th and 
 19th of December \ arrested the pending negotiation; 
 
 > See Historic Documents, No. VIII.
 
 GOVERNMENT PARTY. 149 
 
 but the general position was, in consequence, rather 
 aggravated than alleviated. M. Mendizabal more 
 than ever regarded England as his support, while the 
 English cabinet looked upon M. Mendizabal and his 
 party as those from whom their Spanish policy had 
 the most to expect. 
 
 M. Thiers had scarcely entered on power, when a 
 proposition came from London which occasioned him 
 some surprise. The English cabinet, which had re- 
 jDudiated intervention when the moderate party and 
 M. Martinez de la Rosa governed Spain, now took 
 the initiative in that movement when M. Mendizabal 
 had become minister. It proj)osed to the French 
 government to march a corps d'armee into Spain, and 
 to occupy certain valleys in the Basque Provinces, 
 amongst others that of Bastan, while English forces 
 should take possession of St. Sebastian and the har- 
 bour of Passages ; an arrangement which would en- 
 able the Spanish army, then commanded by General 
 Cordova, to pursue the insurgent Carlists to extre- 
 mity, without caring for the points occupied by its 
 allies. I have not before me the actual text of the 
 English proposition, nor of the answer returned by 
 M. Thiers, on the 18th of March 1836. He formally 
 rejected it, not without regret, as he admitted himself 
 some months later in a debate of which this question 
 became the object, but with ample reason according 
 to my opinion. I find in a desjoatch addressed by 
 M. de Rayneval to M. Thiers, on the 31st of March, 
 details which prevent any misconception as to the 
 true motive and character of the English proposal. " I 
 
 L 3
 
 150 DISMEMBER]MENT OF THE 
 
 had been informed," he says, " by Mr. Villiers of the 
 new part which England was preparing herself to play 
 in the affairs of Spain, and of the part she proposed 
 to you. He has not concealed from me that the first 
 idea of this project proceeded from hmiself; but he 
 refrained from saying that M. Mendizabal was aware 
 of, and approved of it, which nevertheless appears to 
 me beyond all doubt. I foresaw the negative reply 
 of the King's government ; and as it was natural to 
 suppose that before acting, the cabinet of London 
 would assure itself of the consent of Spain, which 
 the language of M. Mendizabal in no way implied, I 
 persuaded myself for a moment that this project 
 would not be followed up. But I was soon unde- 
 ceived. Scarcely had I received your despatch, than 
 we ascertained here, at once by an English courier 
 and by an express from General Cordova, that the 
 British government had not only taken the resolu- 
 tion of interfering directly in the war against the 
 Pretender, but had already adopted measures, and 
 issued the necessary orders on this subject. The 
 astonishment of the public was great at seeing the 
 English cabinet, without any pre\aous indication, thus 
 suddenly change its system, and M. Mendizabal act 
 in the same manner, by the accejotance, not to say the 
 den;and of those foreign succours, which only a short 
 time since he so disdainfully rejected. Queen Chris- 
 tina had some slight intimation of this affair two daj^s 
 before the opening of the Cortes. She said to M. 
 Mendizabal that she would not accept the direct aid 
 of England, unless France consented to contribute
 
 GOVERNMENT PARTY. 151 
 
 liers. As soon as she was informed that all was ar- 
 ranged, and even, as it may be said, carried into 
 execution, without her consent, and in some degree 
 without her knowledge, she evinced the most violent 
 irritation, to such an extent, that for two da^^s she 
 
 refused to see M. Mendizabal She accused 
 
 him of having failed in his duty towards her and the 
 state by a clandestine negotiation, and of ha\dng ren- 
 dered himself guilty of treason by furnishing the 
 English with the opportunity, which they had long 
 sought, of taking possession of some of the ports of 
 
 Biscay I have been enabled to judge myself 
 
 of the dissatisfaction of this princess I have 
 
 had, on the same subject, two conversations with M. 
 Mendizabal. He has anxiously endeavoured to per- 
 suade me, that the project in question was settled in 
 London without his knowledge. At the same time 
 he endeavoured to exculpate himself from the re- 
 proach of inconsistency by accepting foreign inter- 
 vention. He assumed that the name could not be 
 given to the present proceeding of England, and that 
 we were to blame in persisting to see intervention in 
 the military operation proposed to us by the British 
 cabinet. After listening to the explanations I thought 
 it my duty to give him as to what had passed in Paris 
 on this topic, he again took up the question of inter- 
 vention properly so called, and this time with the air 
 of a man who had only weak scruples against such a 
 measure." 
 
 In this state of minds at Madrid, London, and 
 Paris, the refusal of intervention, pronounced in the 
 
 L 4
 
 152 DISMEMBERMENT OF THE 
 
 terms and ^vith the reserve employed by M. Thiers, 
 amounted merely to an adjournment of the question ; 
 clear and positive for the present, it did not confine 
 itself to the freedom of action which a judicious govern- 
 ment should always preserve ; it distinctly allowed 
 glimpses of its anticipations, and of the chances of a 
 contrary resolution. " With whatever name it may 
 be covered," he wrote to M. de Eayneval, on the 30th 
 of A^^ril, " within whatever limit it may be proposed 
 to restrain it, even to the occupation of the Bastan, 
 armed intervention is still repulsed, at this moment, 
 by the same considerations which \x]) to this point 
 have prevented us from consenting to it. Without 
 any prejudgment on the changes which diiFerent cir- 
 cumstances might sooner or later produce in our 
 determination, we feel bound to declare, that as long- 
 as things remain in their present state, any attempt 
 to obtain from us an armed co-operation would prove 
 fruitless. Such steps, which, like those already taken, 
 could not fail to become public, would amount to gra- 
 tuitous imprudence, since, while bringing into new 
 light the distress of the Queen's government, and 
 exposing it to a mortifying refusal, they could only 
 produce the effect of weakening still more its remains 
 of moral strength. Its friends, therefore, cannot too 
 strongly advise abstention from this course." 
 
 The permanence and progress of the two scourges 
 which desolated Spain, civil war and the spirit of re- 
 volution, rendered this forbearance in Madrid, and 
 this expectant reserve in Paris, more and more diffi- 
 cult. In the Basque Provinces, the Carlist bands and
 
 GOVERNMENT rAllTY. 153 
 
 the royal troops, while combating with ineffectual 
 animosity, gave themselves up mutually to revolt- 
 ing cruelties, nearly always tolerated, and sometmies 
 commanded by their chiefs. Fresh partisans of the 
 rebellion, even more audacious than the first insur- 
 gents, overran Spain in every sense, spread terror 
 even to the gates of Madrid, and seemed to be pro- 
 tected in their erratic courses, alternately by the weak- 
 ness of the authorities and the favour of the populace. 
 At the same time, plots of secret societies and demo- 
 cratic passions burst forth in the provinces of the 
 south, at Barcelona, Valencia, Malaga, Seville, Cor- 
 dova, and Cadiz; raising in all quarters the cry of 
 '■''Long live the Constitutmi 0/ 1812 !" and leading on 
 every side to scenes of bloodshed. Impotent to re- 
 press these excesses, the Spanish government at one 
 moment endeavoured to palliate, at another to appease 
 them, by adopting measures agreeable to the liberal 
 and systematic reformers, — such as the suppression 
 of all the religious corporations, the closing of the 
 convents, the sale of their property, the repeated dis- 
 solution of the Cortes, in which the moderates predo- 
 minated, and their convocation according to more 
 democratic laws, which nevertheless brought back the 
 same party in a majority, or in a close condition to 
 re-establish one. Men soon exhaust themselves in 
 exercising the double trade of daring innovators, or 
 rulers without strength. M. Mendizabal fell. M. 
 Isturitz succeeded him ; more moderate and delibera- 
 tive, and more mdependent of English influence ; but, 
 despite his good intentions, nearly as ineffective in
 
 15 4 DISMEMBERMENT OF THE 
 
 putting an end to the civil war, in re-establishing 
 order in the state, in the finances, in the streets, and 
 in securing the future of the constitutional monarchy, 
 by rendering real and practical for all Spaniards the 
 rights and guarantees which it had promised them. 
 Even in Madiid, on the 17 th of July and the 3rd of 
 August, revolutionary anarchy exhibited itself, and 
 would have triumphed there from that time, but for 
 the energy of a man, destined to be for a moment its 
 conqueror, and speedily its ^dctim. Being informed 
 that an assembly of national guards, horse and foot, 
 had met on the Prado to proclaim the constitution of 
 1812, General Quesada, Captain-General of Castille, a 
 rigid disciplinarian, an excellent soldier, and a staunch 
 Spaniard, repaired thither about ten o'clock in the 
 evening, with an escort of only twenty carabineers, 
 and exulting in the opportunity of displaying his 
 authority and courage in the presence of rebels, 
 apostrophised them instantly thus : — " You are pol- 
 troons and assassins; you are not men. I am tired 
 of these games of women and children. I want 
 battle and blood. Let those who desire the constitu- 
 tion select from all these houses that which suits 
 them best; let them occupy it, and I undertake to 
 dislodge them vnth these twenty soldiers. You have 
 hii-ed men to kill me, but I defy you aU." " All were 
 silent," wrote M. de Bois le Comte, who had just 
 arrived at Madidd, whither he had been despatched 
 by M. Thiers, and who gathered these details from eye- 
 witnesses. '" Well,' added General Quesada, 'what 
 are you doing there ? Why have you come?' Some
 
 GOVERNMENT TARTY. 155 
 
 officers replied, ' We heard the generale beaten, and 
 we assembled in consequence: are we to disperse?' 
 ' No, keep together, on the contrary, for I am deter- 
 mined to exterminate you once for all.' The national 
 guards were divided amongst themselves : some had 
 revealed the plot to the authorities, and promised 
 their assistance for the maintenance of order. When 
 Quesada summoned them to keep their word, they 
 excused themselves timidly. ' Go, go,' he said, 
 ' you mean well, but you are cowards ; go your ways, 
 for you impede me.' All the national guards retired 
 gradually, and the Prado was evacuated. Towards 
 one in the morning, Quesada went to the ' Plaza 
 major.' He found the national guards there, accom- 
 panied by some grumblers. ' I require your quarter,' 
 he said to the guards ; ' which will you prefer, to 
 surrender or defend it ? Take your choice, it is the 
 same to me. If you mean to keep it, fight at once.' 
 The national guards yielded up the quarter, which 
 was immediately occupied by the Queen Regent's 
 regiment.' " ' 
 
 Few generals were so energetic or fortunate in the 
 suppression of revolts as General Quesada, who evi- 
 dently could not always expect the same success. 
 Arriving one upon the other at Paris, these new evi- 
 dences of the lamentable state of Spain excited in 
 the government the most contrary impressions and 
 intentions. The adversaries and partisans of inter- 
 vention. King Louis-Philippe and M. Thiers, found 
 
 1 M. de Bois le Comte to M. Thiers ; despatch of the 22ik1 
 of April, 1836.
 
 156 DISMEMBERMENT OF THE 
 
 in them decisive reasons in support of their respective 
 policy. According to M. Thiers, civil war was the cause 
 of all the evils of Spain ; the Carlist insurrection alone 
 fomented revolutionary terrors and passions. Let the 
 civil war be extinguished, and Spain would become 
 governable; since the authority of Queen Isabella 
 was not in a condition to stifle the contest, it belonged 
 to France to accomplish that work. By the treaty of 
 the Quadruple Alliance, she was pledged to do so. 
 Moreover, the interest of France commanded it as 
 much as that of Spain. The France of 1830 could 
 not suffer the triumph of Don Carlos in the latter 
 country. In the opinion of King Louis-Philippe, on 
 the contrary, the more the civil war and anarchy con- 
 tinued to display themselves obstinately in Spain, the 
 less ought France to take upon herself to bring it to 
 an end. Whatever might be her successes at first, 
 she would undertake an impracticable work; neither 
 the Carlist insurrection nor the anarchy in Spain were 
 superficial accidents, momentary and easy to be sub- 
 dued. Both found in the traditions, manners, and 
 2:)assions of the Spaniards, deeply-seated roots, and for 
 a long time they would spring up again incessantly, 
 and with increased vigour, when foreigners attempted 
 to repress them. It would therefore not be in a hasty 
 expedition of war, but in a long occupation, and in a 
 close association with the Spanish government, that 
 France would find herself involved. Far from pre- 
 scribing such a line of conduct, French interests abso- 
 lutely interdicted it. France had enough to do to 
 establish order and liberty at home. On her own
 
 GOVERNMENT PARTY. 157 
 
 account she had nothing to fear from the Carlist insur- 
 rection in Spain, which, in any case, would be in no 
 condition to attempt aught against us. Besides, 
 despite its momentary triumph, it was very probable 
 that this insurrection would not ultimately succeed, 
 and that in the midst of varying chances, gloomy 
 trials, and protracted efforts, the constitutional govern- 
 ment of Queen Isabella might triumph in the long 
 run. But that it was for Spain herself to reach this 
 end, for she alone could accomplish it. In this France 
 ought to assist, but not to take the lead. The treaty 
 of the Quadruple Alliance imposed no such necessity 
 on us. We had already fulfilled and exceeded the 
 obligations contracted, by the indirect aid we had 
 already given, and were still giving, to the Queen of 
 Spain. We were not called upon, as was the Kesto- 
 ration in 1823, to exhibit beyond the Pyrenees proofs 
 of political boldness and of the fidelity of our army. 
 If we embarked in a direct and extended interven- 
 tion, similar to that of the former epoch, we should 
 doom ourselves either to retire speedily, leaving Spain 
 a prey to incalculable disorders, or to assume for an 
 indefinite period the responsibility of her government 
 and of her future destiny. The King neither ought, 
 nor would he consent to impose such a burden on 
 France. 
 
 An attempt was made to reconcile the two lines of 
 policy. The King agreed that the indirect succour 
 aiforded to Spain should receive new extension. 
 Arms and munitions of war were forwarded. The 
 foreign legion, already in the service of Queen Isa-
 
 158 DISMEMBERMENT OF THE 
 
 bella, had been reduced by its campaigns to 2500 
 men ; it was arranged that it should be augmented to 
 6000, by recruiting in France, in the name of the 
 Spanish government and its agents. A French 
 general of reputation (General Bugeaud, and even 
 Marshal Clauzel were spoken of) was to be appointed 
 to the command of this corps, with which some 
 Spanish regiments were to be associated, but it was 
 to remain officially under the orders of the general in 
 chief of the Spanish army. M. Thiers, on his side, 
 appeared to content himself with this development of 
 indirect co-operation, and M. de Bois le Comte, who 
 at this precise epoch was despatched to Madrid where 
 M. de Rayneval had fallen seriously ill, was instructed 
 to announce to the Spanish cabinet that the French 
 government would go no farther. In rendering 
 account to M. Thiers, on the 9th of August 1836, 
 of his arrival at Madrid and of his first interview 
 with M. Isturitz, " I began," he wrote, " by telling him 
 in the most decided and unqualified manner that he 
 must renounce all idea of direct intervention; that 
 the King's government saw with regret that, in spite 
 of all we had represented on the impossibility of our 
 adopting that course, the Spanish cabinet had never 
 abandoned the hope of one day persuading us to 
 it; that I must destroy that illusion, which had 
 exercised a flital influence, for by always recurring to 
 that perspective as a last resource, he and his ministry 
 had prevented the royal cause from developing its 
 full energy and from employing all its means." 
 
 But the most determined words suffice not to settle
 
 GOVERNMENT TAHTY. 159 
 
 questions and to dissipate hopes which have been 
 lono; broodino- in the minds of nations. On the 12th 
 of August 1836, three days after he had commu- 
 nicated Avith M. Isturitz, in the terms I have just 
 quoted, M. de Bois le Comte again wrote to M. Thiers : 
 " The Spaniards are so accustomed to see us interfere 
 in their affairs, and reguLate their disputes of succes- 
 sion, from the days of Henry of Transtamare to those 
 of Philip v., Ferdinand YIL, his father, and Queen 
 Isabella, that the idea of our finally adopting the 
 same course now is so profoundly received, that it 
 can with the greatest difiiculty be eradicated from 
 their minds. They believe that they should let us 
 say what we please, and that we shall inevitably 'vvind 
 up by direct intervention, not being able to tolerate 
 in Spain either revolutionary anarchy or the restora- 
 tion of Don Carlos. I have found this conviction in 
 M. Isturitz and the Queen Regent, and in her whole 
 court ; to combat it, I have employed the full force of 
 the expressions which your Excellency used to con- 
 vince me of the firm resolve of the government to 
 refuse, at all tmies, direct intervention. I believe I 
 have at last persuaded Queen Christina and M. 
 Isturitz, and have made them comprehend that they 
 must seek their safety in their own energy, and con- 
 sider us henceforward as their most powerful prop, 
 but no longer as the vital principle of their cause. 
 But this impression which I have been enabled to 
 produce on the Queen and her cabinet, is not received 
 by the public. The coincidence of my arrival with the 
 success of the Carlists, and with the proclamation in
 
 IGO DISMEMBERMENT OF THE 
 
 Arragon and in Andalusia, of the constitution of 1812, 
 has inspired all minds with a confidence that I was at 
 last the herald of the intervention so anxiously de- 
 sired. Some even say that I announced it positively; 
 others, that I proclaimed a measure which would 
 inevitably lead to it." 
 
 It was necessary to emerge from this position, which 
 held minds in uncertainty — at Paris in action, and at 
 Madrid in expectation; to choose, in fine, between 
 indirect assistance and direct and complete interven- 
 tion. The discussion was renewed in the council, 
 and became daily more animated and clear. The 
 King thought he had a right to complain that in the 
 execution of the measures of indirect aid to which he 
 had recently consented, the stipulated limits had been 
 exceeded; the recruiting for the foreign legion, fixed 
 at 6000 men, already, he said, amounted to 8000, and 
 was still actively going on, not through the medium of 
 General Alava, as had been arranged, but by the aides 
 de camp of the Minister for War himself. Marshal 
 Maison. Questions, explanations, and retorts, suc- 
 ceeded each other incessantly in the council, in 
 which six of the ministers coincided with M. Thiers, 
 and one only, the Count de Montalivet, with the King. 
 The two lines of policy were in presence and ap- 
 proached a crisis, both supported by a sincere con< 
 viction, and relying, one on the urgency of existing 
 circumstances, and the desire of Spain evidently pro- 
 nounced in favour of intervention ; the other, on 
 prospective considerations and the feeling of France, 
 which clearly showed itself opposed to the measure.
 
 GOVERNMENT TARTY. 161 
 
 " Nothing can incline the King to intervention," said 
 M. Thiers one day to his Majesty, " and nothing can 
 lead me to renounce it." 
 
 In the meanwhile news reached Paris that, on the 
 12th of August, at St. Ildefonso, where the Regent and 
 the young Queen then resided, the two regiments on 
 duty — one of provincial militia, the other of the Guards 
 — suddenly broke out into insurrection, marched uj^on 
 the palace of La Granja, and clamorously proclaimed 
 the constitution of 1812. Queen Christina, with re- 
 markable courage and self-possession, vainly opposed 
 to this sedition her personal influence and resistance. 
 In the absence of all effective force, she was compelled 
 to give way, and finally authorized these troops " to 
 swear the constitution until the assembly of the 
 Cortes." On the 13th of August, in the square of 
 St. Ildefonso, officers and soldiers took the oath. On 
 the 14th, a similar insurrection broke out in Madrid. 
 General Quesada suppressed it for the moment ; but 
 on the 15th, when what had taken place at St. Ildefonso 
 transj^ired in the capital, the movement became irresis- 
 tible ; the Isturitz cabinet broke up, and a new ministry 
 composed of old partisans of the constitution of 1812, 
 was forced on the Queen Regent, under the presidency 
 of M. Calatrava. On the 17th of August, the two 
 Queens re-entered Madrid, the Cortes, which had been 
 on the point of assembling, were dissolved, and on 
 the 21st of August a royal decree convoked new ones 
 for the 24th of October, according to the system 
 prescribed by the constitution of 1812, and to bring 
 it into operation. 
 
 VOL. IV. M
 
 162 DISMEMBERMENT OF THE 
 
 As I have spoken of General Qaesada, and liis 
 attitude in presence of sedition, I shall here repeat 
 textually what M. de Bois le Comte communicated on 
 the 30th of August with reference to his death and 
 character. It is the lawful right of great hearts 
 sacrificed to savage violence, that the remembrance of 
 their last moments should be preserved with respect, 
 for the glory of their names, as well as for the instruc- 
 tion of the living. The stoic Thrasea, condemned to 
 death by Nero, said to his son-in-law, Helvidius Pris- 
 ons, when ordering his veins to be opened: " Behold, 
 young man ! you are born in times when the soul re- 
 quires to be fortified by firm examples." ^ We have seen 
 days when such examples were as necessary in France 
 as in Kome under Nero. Those days are far removed 
 from us; but even now, and sheltered from mortal 
 dangers, it is well to know how to preserve our honour. 
 " The first idea of the revolutionists on becoming 
 masters of the capital," says M. de Bois le Comte, 
 " was to prevent the escape of Quesada. Warned too 
 late, he took the road to Burgos, and had scarcely 
 entered on it, when he was followed by a crowd of 
 the militia. He soon discovered that he could not 
 escape their pursuit. Having reached Hortaleza, one 
 league from Madrid, he took refuge in a house. The 
 soldiers had already arrived. A little girl saw him, 
 and asked if he wished to speak with the parish priest. 
 " Undoubtedly," replied he, "I require the priest, for 
 I am about to die." Resigned to his fate, he traversed 
 
 * "Spectejuvenis; in ea tetnporanatus,et quibusfirmare animum 
 cxpediat constantibus exemplis." — Tacit. Annul, lib. xvi. cap. 35.
 
 GOVERNMENT PARTY. 163 
 
 the chamber with rapid steps, without seeking to con- 
 ceal himself, and passing his hand through his hair, 
 according to his habitual gesture. The militia-men 
 dared not to attack him hand to hand ; they fired on 
 him through the bars of the mndow ; the baU entered 
 his body. He looked on them, saying, ' If you wish 
 to kill me you must fire a second time ; once is not 
 sufiicient." Several shots then followed; they broke 
 open the door, and pierced him with swords. Tlie 
 fury of the murderers glutted itself in a thousand 
 atrocities perpetrated on his still breathing body and 
 continued on his corpse. Thus fell a true Spaniard, 
 extreme in his good qualities as in his faults ; a fiery 
 soldier of the faith in 1823 ; an anarchical promoter of 
 the overthrow of M. Zea Bermudez in 1833; having, 
 under all conflicting circumstances, avowedly attacked 
 and repressed, with unswerving energy, the same 
 boasters and bravado, — the Carlists, the men of the 
 clubs, and the men of the revolution. He saw his fate, 
 and marched to it without illusion, hope, or anxiety. 
 Singly he restrained the revolutionary movement at 
 Madrid and disarmed it, when the Queen's cause 
 encountered shipwreck on another point and swept 
 him away in its fall." 
 
 The murder of Quesada, the flight of the principal 
 leaders of the moderate party, the sanguinary clamours 
 which were raised agaiust them, the intelligence from 
 the provinces, which announced almost every where 
 the same excitement, threw the honest and peaceable 
 population into consternation filled with alarm. " I 
 do not believe in a reign of terror in Spain," M. de Bois 
 
 M 2
 
 164 DISMEMBERMENT OF THE 
 
 le Comte wrote to M. Thiers, " but minds are power- 
 fully stirred up. Not a newspaper has yet condemned 
 the murder of Quesada, committed six days ago. Not 
 one has dared to raise a doubt on the perfect spon- 
 taneity with which the Queen has accepted the con- 
 stitution. The editorship of all the moderate journals 
 has been changed; there is not at this moment in 
 Madrid a single opposition paper. As to a Carlist 
 journal, nobody has ever thought it possible to esta- 
 blish one. With such popular habits, it is difficult 
 to exercise a government here, based upon publicity 
 and free discussion As to us, the intelli- 
 gent section of the revolutionists would like to con- 
 ciliate France, and entreat her support. The savage, 
 ignorant portion, which predominates in the streets 
 and barracks, and unfortunately also in the secret 
 societies, from whence this movement springs, affects 
 to brave us ; and for the last few days you hear per- 
 petually repeated in the coffee-houses of Madrid this 
 sentence, which has become proverbial : — ' Ea ver 
 aJiora, lo que haran esos picaros de Franceses.^ ^ We 
 shall see now what these French rogues will do.' " ^ 
 
 Perplexity increased in the council, already so dis- 
 turbed, when all these particulars successively reached 
 Paris. To whose advantage would intervention hence- 
 forth tend, supposing it should be adopted? What 
 government were we going to support in Spain? 
 Would Queen Christina remain Regent? What atti- 
 tude would the Eno-lish cabinet assume towards the men 
 
 'to' 
 
 1 Despatches of M. de Bois le Comte, of tlie 17th and 21st of 
 August, 1836.
 
 GOVERNMENT PARTY. 165 
 
 who brought back the constitution of 1812 by violence ? 
 M. Mendizabal, to whom it had seemed so partial, was, 
 according to all accounts, the principal fomenter of 
 the insurrection of St. Ildefonso and of Madrid. The 
 future of Spain was charged vnth dark clouds and 
 storms in the darkness. More determined than ever 
 not to involve in them France and her government, 
 the King demanded that the troops assembled on the 
 Pyrenees should be removed, to render it quite clear 
 that they could not enter Spain in aid of revolu- 
 tionary power, and of the obscure contingencies it 
 seemed to develop. The cabinet formally refused 
 this measure, declaring that it would be a decided 
 and open disavowal of intervention. " We must 
 break the ice," said M. Thiers; the King will not 
 consent to intervention; we wish it; I retire." His 
 colleagues, with the exception of M. de Montalivet, 
 seconded his resignation. " Gentlemen," said the King, 
 "it is then understood that the cabinet is dissolved. 
 I request you not to speak of it, and to remain at 
 your posts while I look for your successors." No 
 doubt or complaint could be raised. The King and 
 his advisers separated in consequence of a profound 
 disagreement on a serious question, which would 
 be carried before the Chambers and the country. 
 Each exercised an indisputable privilege, guaranteed 
 by their mutual influence and dignity in the govern- 
 ment of the state. 
 
 M 3
 
 1G6 MY ALLIANCE AND RUPTURE 
 
 CHAPTER III. 
 
 MY ALLIANCE AND EUPTUEE WITH M. MOLE. 
 
 MY RELATIONS WITH COUNT MOLE. FORMATION OF THE CABINET OF THE 
 
 6th OF SEPTEMBER, 1836. DIFFERENT SENTIMENTS OF MY POLITICAL 
 
 FRIENDS. FROM WHAT MOTIVES AND ON WHAT CONDITIONS I JOINED 
 
 THE CABINET, ITS FIRST ACTS. STATE OF AFFAIRS IN ALGERIA. — 
 
 EXPEDITION TO CONSTANTINE. MARSHAL CLAUZEL. THE COM- 
 MANDANT CHANGARNIER. GENERAL TREZEL. ILL SUCCESS OF THE 
 
 EXPEDITION. RETREAT OF THE ARMY. CONSPIRACY OF STRASBOURG. 
 
 PRINCE LOUIS BONAPARTE. HIS FAILURE AND EMBARKATION AT 
 
 l' ORIENT. MOTIVES OF THE CABINET FOR NOT BRINGING HIM BEFORE 
 
 THE TRIBLTTALS. OPENING OF THE SESSION OF THE CHAMBERS. 
 
 ATTEMPT TO ASSASSINATE KING LOUIS-PHILIPPE. DEBATE ON THE 
 
 ADDRESS. PROSECUTION OF THE CONSPIRATORS OF STRASBOURG BEFORE 
 
 THE COURT OF ASSIZES AT COLMAR. ACQUITTAL OF THE ACCUSED. 
 
 BILLS PRESENTED TO THE CHAMBERS. ON THE DISJUNCTION OF 
 
 CERTAIN CRIMINAL PROCESSES ; ON THE PLACE OF TRANSPORTATION ; 
 
 AND ON THE NON-REVELATION OF PLOTS AGAINST THE KING'S LIFE, 
 
 ON THE DOTATION OF THE DUKE DE NEMOURS, — PRESENTIMENTS OF 
 
 KING LOUIS-PHILIPPE ON THE FUTURE OF HIS FAMILY. THE BILL ON 
 
 DISJUNCTION REJECTED BY THE CHAMBER OF DEPUTIES, THE CABINET 
 
 BREAKS UP. DIFFERENT ATTEMPTS TO FORM A NEW MINISTRY. THE 
 
 KING SENDS FOR ME. MY PROPOSITIONS AND ENDEAVOURS, THEY 
 
 MISCARRY. — I RETIRE, WITH MM. DUCHAtEL, GASPARIN AND PERSIL, 
 
 M. MOLE FORMS THE CABINET OF THE 15tH OF APRIL, 1837. 
 
 (1836—1837.) 
 
 Long before the crisis exploded, I had left Paris 
 with my mother and children to pass some weeks in 
 Normandy, at first at Lisieux, and subsequently at 
 the seat of the Duke de Broglie. I wished, even in
 
 WITH M. MOLE. 167 
 
 the eyes of the idle gossips, to remain a stranger to 
 the fall of the cabinet, and to avoid finding myself 
 engaged in any of the combinations connected Avith 
 the selection of its successors. I was bent on pre- 
 serving, in this future, my entire liberty. The public, 
 who had been surprised by the fall of the cabinet of 
 the 11th of October 1832, felt, ^vithout regretting it, 
 the retirement of that of the 22nd of February 1836 
 to be sudden, and seemed weary of ministerial crises. 
 From this conviction, and my o^vn choice, I found it 
 convenient to keep aloof. 
 
 An attempt was made to change my plan. I re- 
 ceived from Count Mole an invitation to visit and 
 converse with him. I declined the overture, and he 
 understood me, for he wrote thus from Acosta on 
 the 18th of August : " On my arrival I found your 
 answer. I should be grieved to cause you the 
 slightest disturbance, and I hasten to tell you so. I 
 shaU myself be moving about in the neighbourhood 
 of Paris until the session recals me there. You 
 know without doubt that all the resignations have 
 been tendered and accepted. The telegraphic des- 
 patch announcing the events at St. Ildefonso has 
 changed or adjourned ever3rthing." 
 
 There were many reasons and chances why M. 
 Mole should succeed M. Thiers. In 1830 he had 
 held, with favour from the King and the public, the 
 post of Minister of Foreign Affairs. Since the 
 Spanish pohtics began to agitate people's minds, he 
 had openly declared against intervention. His name, 
 his social position, his experience of the great 
 
 M 4
 
 168 MY ALLIANCE AND EUrTUKE 
 
 functions of government under the Empire and the 
 Restoration, his personal merit, the prudent tone and 
 charm of his conversation, his dignified and polished 
 manners, gave him high consideration with the party 
 of order, and seemed to point him out expressly for 
 the conduct of foreign affairs . He was ambitious, 
 and he had a right to be so. M. Bertin de Veaux, 
 who knew him well, and was a competent judge, often 
 said to me, " No one surj^asses M. Mole in the great 
 intrigue of politics. There he is full of activity, long 
 foresight, skilful solicitude, discreet regard for indi- 
 viduals, arid of becoming ingenuity without display. 
 There is pleasure in being connected with him." He 
 then added, with a smile, " more pleasure than safety." 
 In truth, M. Mole was reproached with being exclu- 
 sively occupied with himself and his personal success, 
 and of forgetting too easily his associates and what 
 they had a right to expect from him. 
 
 I had no old intimacy with M. Mole. Before the 
 Restoration, when he was grand judge, minister of 
 justice, and in favour with the Emperor Napoleon, I 
 had sometimes met him in society; amongst other 
 places, at the house of Madame de la Briche, his 
 mother-in-law, and also at that of Madame de Re- 
 musat, but he was then cold and silent. I was 
 young, and of the liberal opposition; we saw each 
 other without becoming acquainted. Under the 
 Restoration, and Avhen he joined the cabinet of the 
 Duke of Richelieu as Minister of Marine, we had 
 more frequent communication, but without attaining 
 habits of familiarity. I was connected Avith M.
 
 WITH M. MOLE. 169 
 
 Decazes, who thought he had reason to complain of 
 M. Mole, and this misunderstanding extended to 
 their friends. The Revolution of 1830 brought us 
 more closely together, and both in the first cabinet 
 of the government of July, and during the admin- 
 istration of M. Casimir Perier, we thought and acted 
 nearly always in unison, but still without close and 
 personal attachment. While the cabinet of the 11th 
 October 1832 lasted, M. Mole was habitually, and in 
 accordance mth his position and character, in the ranks 
 of the advocates of order. Nevertheless, he separated 
 himself from the ministry in some circumstances 
 which were considered decisive, and which seemed 
 to us to require immoveable resolution ; amongst 
 others in the course of the great trial instituted 
 in the Chamber of Peers against the insurgents of 
 April 1834. He entertained, also, in respect to our 
 foreign relations, if not a distinct policy, at least a 
 political tendency opposed to that of the cabinet, and 
 particularly of the Duke de Broglie. He held less 
 closely to the English alliance, and seemed more 
 disposed to seek the friendship of the Continental 
 courts. From these various causes a certain cold- 
 ness sprang up between us. 
 
 But in 1835, after the attem2:)t of Fieschi, and 
 especially in 183G, on the fall of the cabinet of the 
 11th of October 1832, the most friendly and 
 habitual relations were formed between M. Mole 
 and me. He was sedulous to cultivate them. We 
 often met at the house of the Countess de Castellane, 
 one of those persons the most admirably adapted to
 
 170 MY ALLIiVNCE AND KUPTUKE 
 
 bring together men she wished to unite, as she could 
 equally have succeeded in embroiling them, had 
 such been her object. Animated, but attractive and 
 gentle, of an original turn of mind, easy and fertile, 
 without displaying any pretension beyond the desire 
 of pleasing and amusing, full of art, yet apparently 
 natural, seductive, while seeming to be interested 
 and charmed, comprehending and enjoying every- 
 thing, — literature, the fine arts, and politics, — and 
 with the habitual air of caring for nothing beyond 
 the pleasure of indulging in the conversation, or of 
 promoting the enjoyments or interests of those she 
 sought to attract to her drawing-rooms, or win over 
 to her views. Her circle was limited; comprising 
 some men of the world, some distinguished by genius, 
 with a few foreigners, diplomatists and travellers. 
 Conversation was unrestricted at her parties. To- 
 wards those she had reasons for wishing to please, she 
 knew how to practise graceful, affectionate, and re- 
 fined distinctions. I was included in these, with the 
 avowed and not inconvenient object of establishing 
 habits of friendly intelligence and agreement between 
 M. Mole and myself In this she succeeded without 
 difficulty, for at that period, and on the questions in 
 the order of the day, there was no discord between us. 
 We mutually aided in the duration and transactions 
 of M. Thiers' s cabinet, estimating them nearly always 
 in the same spirit, and mth similar conjectures as to 
 the future. 
 
 I was at Broglie when the resignation of M. Thiers 
 became a public fact, and was announced in the
 
 WITH M. MOLE. 171 
 
 Moniteur of the 26tli of August. I immediately re- 
 ceived two letters, dated on the same day, one from 
 M. Bertin de Veaux, the other from M. Mole. " My 
 dear friend," M. Bertin de Yeaux began, " I have 
 told you several times through your son, and once 
 through the Duke de Broglie, not to appear in Paris. 
 The fate of M. Thiers was then uncertain, and I did 
 not wish that he, or any one else, should be able to say 
 that you had come to precipitate his fall. To-day, 
 the Moniteur has spoken, and the course must be 
 changed. Your presence now will surely be useful ; 
 it is even necessary, for in such critical circumstances 
 minutes are precious. Hasten, then, to return. Be 
 assured that I consider your interest as my own, and 
 that I would not advise you to what I should abstain 
 from myself." M. Mole said to me: " You will now 
 comprehend the reasons which made me wish to see 
 you. I received this evening, at Acosta, a letter 
 from the King, urging me to repair to him. I have 
 just left him, having stated my desire to come to an 
 understanding with you before proceeding farther. 
 Moments are valuable. I hope you will think so 
 with me." 
 
 Looking upon things as they actually stood, my 
 position was simple. It was on the Spanish question, 
 and to evade intervention that the new cabinet was 
 forming, and I was opposed to intervention. The 
 question was to return, internally and externally, 
 towards the policy, principles, and persons, of the 
 cabinet of the 11th of October 1832. The King de- 
 manded my co-operation in an important conjuncture,
 
 172 MY ALLIANCE AND RUrTURE 
 
 both as regarded himself and the country, and in 
 which I approved of his resistance to the preceding 
 cabinet. He required, he said, in the Chamber of 
 Deputies, either M. Thiers or me, and on this point 
 the public, as well as the Chambers, were of the same 
 ojDinion. No concession was required from me, no 
 obstacle was raised Avhich might have furnished me 
 with a pretext for refusal. 
 
 Amongst my political friends, sentiments were 
 divided. Some regretted that I should resume office 
 so soon ; I had too recently left it ; experience of the 
 mischief accruing from a deviation from the policy of 
 resistance had neither been sufficiently long nor com- 
 plete; the reaction which called us back towards that 
 system was only commencing ; during my retirement, 
 my position had increased with repose; it would 
 advance and consolidate itself still more if I remained 
 for an interval unconnected with power, and I could 
 resume it at a future period with all the authority 
 I might require. This, amongst others, was the 
 opinion of M. Duvergier de Hauranne, who displayed 
 at that time towards me tokens of sagacity, fidelity, 
 and, I may add, of moderation, which nothing that 
 has since passed between us either can or ought to 
 prevent me from acknowledging. Others, and I may 
 say the greater part, considered my return as natural 
 and necessary. I had not sought it; I was entirely 
 a stranger to the fall of M. Thiers ; I had not even 
 opened my mouth on the question before which he 
 succumbed. They would not admit that I could deny 
 myself to the King's desire when my opinion accorded
 
 WITH M. MOLE. 173 
 
 with his, or to the opportunity of adding his rank 
 and influence to the political party I espoused. To 
 this opinion, some added, that on resuming office I 
 should explicitly demand the lead. " I do not think 
 I deceive myself;" thus wrote to me from Nismes the 
 president of the royal court, M. de Daunant, one of 
 my oldest and most judicious friends, " in telling you 
 that you are generally expected to be at the head of 
 the new cabinet. The serious difficulties that pre- 
 viously existed have, without doubt, been augmented 
 by the wavering policy adopted during the last six 
 months. A longer trial would in all probability have 
 completed its discredit ; but I hope that this unhappy 
 essay, and the confidence you inspire, -will rally round 
 you honest and courageous men." The Duke de 
 Broglie, with his unaffected and magnanimous gene- 
 rosity, expressed the same idea to me with increased 
 energy : " The new ministry," he wrote, " ought to re- 
 ceive you as leader, not only in fact, but in name ; at 
 all events, you will have the responsibility, and should 
 possess the command. A ministry with two presidents, 
 — one nominal, the other actual, — has in reality none; 
 therein is comprised an inevitable and rapid dissolvent." 
 In fine, nearly all accorded in thinking and saying, — 
 that to restore the policy for a moment laid aside, the 
 new cabinet ought to present it under a new aspect. 
 M. Duchatel wrote to me, on the 23rd of August, from 
 La Rochelle, where he was presiding over the General 
 Council : " If a crisis comes on unexpectedly, you 
 should use your freedom. I cannot write to you in 
 detail ; but my opinion is, that two things are neces-
 
 174 MY ALLIANCE AND RUPTURE 
 
 sary: first, not to revive the past, but to create anew; 
 secondly, to be most careful in all that is substituted." 
 The Duke de Broglie was even more exj^licit : " The 
 new ministry ought to be truly new, and it should be 
 the fruit of new combinations which may surprise the 
 public. If it were to present itself as a resurrection, 
 as a weakened and faded counter-trial of the ministry 
 which displaced itself six months ago — as that same 
 ministry, in fact, less such important members as 
 Thiers and liumann, — such an attempt would be 
 mortal; it would not last for a month." 
 
 This was the j^recise source of my discontent. To 
 construct a new cabinet would be to separate myself 
 from the Duke de Broglie. I had recently resigned 
 office vdth him, M. Duchatel, and M. Persil. To re- 
 turn with two only of my associates, without the most 
 intunate of the three, and to take upon myself liis post 
 as President of the Council, no matter what might 
 be the weight of political motives, and of the advice 
 of the Duke himself, would convey an appearance of 
 desertion and infidelity, which grieved and deeply 
 wounded me. 
 
 King Louis-Philippe, in this emergency, committed 
 an error, too common on the part of princes, who, 
 to spare themselves a momentary embarrassment of 
 conversation, frequently assume airs of lightness, in- 
 difference and oblivion. If, after the resignation of 
 M. Thiers, the King had invited the Duke de Broglie, 
 not to resume office, but to converse "with liun, in 
 honest sincerity, on the position, and to discuss its com- 
 patibilities and exigencies, with the necessity of new
 
 WITH M. MOL^. 175 
 
 combinations of persons in maintaining the old policy, 
 he would have found him perfectly disinterested in 
 mind and heart, and without any desire to return to 
 power, much more disposed to decline the offer if made 
 to him, and ready to give the new cabinet his loyal 
 support. The King did not thoroughly know the 
 Duke de Broglie : on this occasion he neither sent for 
 nor wrote to him, nor bestowed on him any token of 
 confiding and affectionate remembrance. The Duke de 
 Broglie felt himself wounded, as did his friends around 
 him ; nobly wounded, as becomes such lofty souls ; the 
 sentiment had no influence on his conduct. Neither 
 his devotion to the King, nor our mutual friendship, 
 nor the sincerity of his concurrence in our common 
 policy, wavered for a single moment. But nevertheless 
 the cabinet about to be formed found in this an un- 
 pleasant incident, and I myself a source of regret, 
 which prejudicially influenced my resolutions. 
 
 I started for Paris, and on my arrival received this 
 note from the King : — " My dear former Minister, I 
 understand you are at last in Paris. I have im- 
 patiently expected you, and I pray you to let me see you 
 as soon as you can. I wish it could be this evening, 
 should my note reach you in time. If you find it too 
 late to come to Neuilly to-night, I propose to you to- 
 morrow morning at ten o'clock, or the Tuileries at 
 twelve. You know the sentiments I entertain for 
 you," I saw the King; I had interviews with M. 
 Mole and M. Duchatel. I collected the impressions 
 and opinions of those of my friends who were then in 
 Paris, and I confined myself to demanding that my two
 
 176 MY ALLIANCE AND RUrTURE 
 
 colleagues in the cabinet of the 11th of October 1832, 
 M. Duchatel and M. Persil, should re-enter into the 
 new ministry, the one as Minister of Finance, the 
 other as Chancellor; that M. de Gasparin should be 
 called to the Ministry of the Interior, in which he 
 already discharged the functions of Under Secretary 
 of State; and that M. de Remusat should replace him 
 in the latter post, I thus secured to my political 
 friends half of the seats, and two of the most important 
 departments in the cabinet. For myself, I only 
 desired to resume the ministry of Public Instruction ; 
 and on these terms I accepted the alliance ^Yith 
 M. Mole, as minister for Foreign Affairs and President 
 of the Council. 
 
 These arrangements were dictated by my personal 
 feelings rather than by political utility and foresight. 
 In consenting to return to office without the Duke de 
 Broglie, I was bent on not procuring for myself any 
 advance of position, any gratification of ambition or 
 self-love ; and I flattered myself that in a council thus 
 formed, having in the Ministry of the Interior two 
 of my staunchest friends, I should exercise upon the 
 general government of the country, although confined 
 within my own modest department, all the influence 
 which the policy I represented could require. I de- 
 ceived myself. There is no such thing as ruling 
 effectually by factitious combinations and indirect 
 means. Setting aside my affections, and consulting 
 policy alone, I had to choose between two lines of 
 conduct. I might refuse to enter a cabinet which I 
 had not formed myself, and which, moreover, wanted
 
 WITH M. MOLE. 177 
 
 several of the principal elements which had given to 
 the ministry of the 11th of October 1832 its strength 
 and authority. Or I might propose for my object to 
 reconstruct that cabinet at some future day, or an- 
 other equivalent to it; and I might have remained 
 until then in that position of watchfulness and expec- 
 tancy which affords to personal difficulties time for 
 obliteration, and to reconciliations the opportunity 
 of being brought about under the pressure of necessity. 
 This would have been, perhaps, the most effectual 
 and prudent course. When I decided to enter the 
 cabinet of M. Mole, I ought to have surmounted my 
 own internal feelings and embarrassments; I should 
 have taken the ministry of the Interior, therel^y 
 directly assuring to myself the power, the responsibility 
 of which would evidently weigh upon me, and should, 
 have transferred my two friends, M. de Remusat and 
 M. Gasparin, one to the ministry of Public Instruction, 
 and the other to that of Agriculture, Commerce, and 
 Public Works; two departments for which they were 
 respectively well qualified. This would have been a 
 more natural and powerful combination than that to 
 which I had given my concurrence. But I yielded to 
 my personal mipressions, to the strong instances of 
 the King, to the urgency of the position, and also to 
 a tendency in my nature to accept too readily whatever 
 cuts short the difficulties of the moment, — to exact 
 too little as to means, and to have too much confidence 
 in success. 
 
 After my adhesion, and the official appointment of 
 the principal ministers, the cabinet still remained in- 
 
 VOL. IV. N
 
 178 MY ALLIANCE AND RUPTURE 
 
 complete for several days. The departments of War 
 and Trade were not disposed of, which led to some 
 difficulty. Marshal Soult declined to resume the port- 
 folio of War under the presidency of Count Mole. 
 Several persons desired, not without reason, that the 
 Count de Montalivet should continue, as minister of 
 Commerce, a member of the cabinet. In the preceding 
 ministry, he alone had opposed intervention in Spain. 
 He possessed courage, activity, tact, and considerable 
 influence in the Chambers. But it suited him not to 
 accept a department inferior to that which he had 
 quitted, and in which his under-secretary of State, 
 M. de Gasparin, had just replaced him. The King, 
 moreover, preferred keeping M. de Montalivet near his 
 own person, and holding liim in reserve, that he might 
 ► at need join any ministry whose tendencies he doubted. 
 General Bernard and M. Martin du Nord were named 
 for War and Trade ; both men of merit, able and use- 
 ful, but not called for by the public, who were weary 
 of being kept in suspense for fifteen days. 
 
 The first measures of the cabinet were well received. 
 The appointment of M. Gabriel Delessert as Prefect of 
 Police obtained general approbation in Paris. He had 
 exhibited rare courage in the outbreaks, and an inde- 
 fatigable devotion to order. His family and himself 
 decided with great reluctance, and from pure zeal for 
 the public good, to accept these delicate functions. He 
 was favourably regarded both for his comphance and 
 hesitation. Soon after the formation of the cabinet, 
 and at its recommendation, the King pardoned sixty- 
 two criminals under sentence for political offences.
 
 WITH M. MOL^. 179 
 
 The ministers of Charles X., confined at Ham, MM. 
 de Chantelouze and de Peyronnet, in the first instance, 
 and a few days later, the Prince de Polignac and M. 
 Guernon de Ranville, were set at liberty, mthout any 
 of those restrictions which give to party passions a 
 useless and vulgar gratification, and under the single 
 condition, as regarded three of them, of remaining, 
 on parole, in residences selected by themselves. The 
 Prince de Polignac was banished from France for 
 twenty jz-ears. The relations of M. Mole with the 
 foreign cabinets and their representatives in Paris 
 commenced under auspices of good- will and reciprocal 
 confidence. I resumed my labours in the expansion 
 and improvement of public instruction in all its de- 
 grees. The elementary schools received many en- 
 couragements. A chair of general j)athology and 
 therapeutics was instituted in the faculty of medicine 
 at Montpellier. In presiding at the re-opening of the 
 lectures of the great normal school in Paris, I applied 
 myself to a clear definition of the character of public 
 teaching as settled by the State, by affirming that in 
 all its degrees, as already practised in the elementary 
 department, it ought to, and could, reconcile itself 
 with the privileges of liberty.^ I used strenuous en- 
 deavours, in the question of publishing, for the sup- 
 pression of spurious editions, both by legislative enact- 
 ments and negotiations with foreign powers. My 
 colleagues promoted with equal anxiety the legal and 
 liberal ameliorations which their departments required 
 
 ' See Historic Documents, No. IX. 
 
 N 2
 
 180 MY ALLIANCE AND RUPTURE 
 
 or admitted. The public, and the Chambers, then on 
 the point of re-assembling, followed with favouring ex- 
 pectation these first steps of a regular and enlightened 
 ministry. But two events, both unexpected, — the ill 
 success of the expedition against Constantine, and the 
 conspiracy of Strasbourg, — quickly and seriously al- 
 tered a position scarcely yet assured, and abruptly in- 
 volved the new cabinet in great struggles and dangers. 
 The preceding ministry had determined on and 
 prepared the expedition against Constantine. Marshal 
 Clauzel has affirmed that M. Thiers adopted his plans 
 of operation and conquest on all the important points 
 of Algeria, and promised him the full means of execu- 
 tion that they required. Authentic documents indicate 
 that the minister of War, Marshal Maison, had as- 
 sociated himself with this approbation and these pro- 
 mises, lea\ing, however, with regard to the expedition 
 against Constantine, something undefined " as to the 
 epoch when it would be convenient to undertake it, 
 and the fresh orders Marshal Clauzel might expect 
 before he entered upon action." When the cabinet of 
 the 22nd of Februar}^ 183 G fell, after its resignation, 
 officially announced on the 30th of August, Marshal 
 Maison wrote to Marshal Clauzel, " that the arrange- 
 ments settled were, on the whole, confirmed by inter- 
 views and verbal communications between several of 
 the King's ministers ; but that they had not yet been 
 made the subject of any deliberation in council, or re- 
 ceived the definitive sanction of the government ; that 
 it rested with the new cabinet to accord or withhold 
 that sanction, and, until then, nothing could be at-
 
 WITH M. MOLE. 181 
 
 tempted, no compromise risked; that he must confine 
 himself within the limits of actual occupation, within 
 those of the eifective force at his command, and of 
 the legislative credits, or at least of the expenditure 
 prescribed and sanctioned." The retiring minister 
 of War thought only of relie\dng himself from the 
 responsibility of the projected enterprise, and of trans- 
 ferring it to his successors. 
 
 Marshal Clauzel was — and not without reason — 
 surprised, offended, and embarrassed. Anxiously 
 wishing to believe, and belie\dng himself authorized, 
 he had already commenced operations. From the 
 2nd of August 1836, he had given to General Eapatel, 
 his substitute ad interim in Algeria, full instructions, 
 which he also communicated to the minister of War, 
 for the execution of what he called " the system of ab- 
 solute rule in the ex-regency, definitively adopted, on 
 my proposition, by the government." He had deter- 
 mined the distribution of troops throughout the whole 
 territory of Algeria ; put m motion those destined to 
 occupy the province of Constantine ; prescribed, both 
 as regarded the means and persons, the measures to 
 be adopted on the scene of action itself, and announced 
 those which had already been transmitted, or were 
 about to be forwarded, from Paris by the minister of 
 War. All these preparatives and orders were kno^vn 
 throughout the Kegency, to the Arabs as well as to 
 our own soldiers, at Constantine and in the city of 
 Algiers ; and Marshal Clauzel wound up his instruc- 
 tions to General Rapatel in these words : " By the 
 9th of October, at the latest, I shall repaii' to Bona to 
 
 N 3
 
 182 MY ALLIANCE AND RUPTURE 
 
 assume direction of the military operations against 
 Constantine." Disturbed, but not arrested in his de- 
 signs, by the evasive and dubious letter addressed to 
 him on the 20th of August by Marshal Maison, he 
 replied thus on the instant : " Will you and the Pre- 
 sident of the Council be so kind as to recollect that 
 you pressed me to set out for Algiers, that I took 
 leave of you eight days before my departure, and that 
 you said nothing to me of the council, in which the 
 plan of operations to be carried out in Africa was to 
 be discussed? You will find, when you recall that 
 circumstance, that I deserve no reproaches." As soon 
 as Marshal Clauzel was made acquainted with the 
 formation of the cabinet of the 6th of September, 
 he addressed to it despatches upon despatches, en- 
 treaties upon entreaties, demanding authority to enter 
 on the campaign. " Constantine," he wi'ote on the 
 24th of September, " is an admirable field for colo- 
 nization ... it is there that we should strike 
 and establish ourselves. All is ready. ' Shall we 
 alone delay ? Shall we not act when time and cir- 
 cumstances call upon us?" 
 
 Inheriting thus a position already defined and press- 
 ing, the cabinet at once adopted two resolutions: 
 the one, to withdraw the general government of 
 Algeria from the paths in which Marshal Clauzel had 
 entangled it, and to remove the Marshal himself as 
 soon as convenience allowed; the other, to sanction 
 his prosecution of the enterprise against Constantine, 
 and to furnish him with the means promised by the 
 antecedent ministry. One of these resolutions was
 
 WITH M. MOLE. 183 
 
 clearly indicated to him, the other officially announced 
 on the 27th of September by the new minister of War, 
 General Bernard, in these terms ; "It has appeared 
 to the King's government that a plan so vast as that 
 laid down in your letter of the 2nd of August to 
 General Rapatel, could not be realized without an 
 increase of expenditure which it does not feel justified 
 in incurring, at least for the present. It is also felt 
 that the exalted conceptions you have submitted re- 
 quire the most serious attention and call for the ma- 
 turest reflection. For these reasons it would have been 
 desired that the expedition against Constantine should 
 have been suspended for the present; but his Ma- 
 jesty's government is impressed with the consequences 
 that might ensue, in such a country as Africa, and in 
 the present spirit of the native population, from the 
 postponement of an expedition publicly announced, 
 and when the prospect of that undertaking has already 
 rallied several tribes to our cause .... It is there- 
 fore because the ex23edition to Constantine has been 
 proclaimed, and for this reason alone, that the King's 
 government now permits it ; but merely as an operation 
 necessitated by events exclusively special, and not 
 intended to lead as a consequence to the execution 
 of the general plan of occupation which you recom- 
 mended ... It must be well understood, Monsieur le 
 Mar^chal, that this expedition is to be carried out with 
 the means (in numbers and material) now actually at 
 your disposal. But you mil observe that these means 
 are superior to the allotment projected in your general 
 plan of occupation, and at least equal to those named 
 
 n' 4
 
 184 IklY ALLIANCE AND KUPTURE 
 
 in your instructions to General Rapatel of the 2nd of 
 August last." 
 
 Even before the receipt of this letter, Marshal 
 Clauzel had ceased to mistake his position. He was 
 well aware that the new cabinet was opposed to the 
 line of conduct in Algeria which, under the old 
 ministry, he had caused to be adopted. Neither had 
 he met on the ground itself all the facilities he anti- 
 cij)ated. For six months pre\dously, and in the 
 prospect of a conquest which he held for certain, he 
 had appointed, as Bey of Constantine, the lieutenant- 
 colonel of Spahis, Youssouf, who pledged himself, by 
 his secret understanding in that province, to secure 
 the fall of the Turkish Bey Achmet, and the almost 
 spontaneous surrender of the place. While waiting 
 for the expedition, the Marshal had despatched Yous- 
 souf to Bona to prepare local arrangements, but the 
 success of his envoy was very incomplete ; with re- 
 gard to the le\y of native auxiliaries, the collecting 
 of baggage mules, and the probability of capitu- 
 lation, the results fell far below his promises. The 
 Marshal sent his aide-de-camp, M..de Ranc^, to de- 
 mand reinforcements; General Bernard replied that 
 the expedition against Constantine was aU that the 
 cabinet authorized, and as the provinces of Algeria and 
 Gran were to remain on the defensive, it was from 
 them that the reinforcements, if required, should be 
 forwarded to Bona. Then commenced a controversy 
 between the minister of War and the Marshal, governed 
 on both sides by a tacit reference to the general plan 
 of conquest and occupation, which the one refused to
 
 WITH M. MOL^. 185 
 
 adopt, and the other persisted in following. According 
 to M. de Ranee, not 30,000, but 45,000 men were re- 
 quired for the operations against Constantino and the 
 other provinces of Algeria. After a month of some- 
 what confused correspondence. General Bernard ob- 
 served to the Marshal that he had 11,478 effective 
 men at Bona, which gave 10,602 present under 
 arms ; that is to say, the force he had at first demanded 
 for the expedition. He sent him in addition the 
 necessary funds to pay 4000 native auxiliaries for six 
 weeks, and finished by saying : " Now, Monsieur le 
 Marechal, either the means at your disposal are those 
 which you yourself pronounced sufficient, and as your 
 instructions to General Rapatel have induced the 
 King's government to believe, or in your real judg- 
 ment they are not so. In the first case, you have no 
 reason to demand reinforcements; in the second, as 
 you are merely permitted, not commanded, to under- 
 take the expedition, you can, if you please, abandon 
 it. It depends therefore solely on yourself to decide 
 on this point according as you find the means you 
 possess sufficient or insufficient." 
 
 To bestow on Marshal Clauzel a distino-uished mark 
 of confidence at the same time, and when he was left 
 free to settle the question he had provoked himself, 
 the Duke of Nemours embarked at Toulon to take 
 part in the expedition to Constantine, as in the pre- 
 ceding year the Duke of Orleans had accompanied 
 that to Mascara. And, to combine foresight with 
 confidence. General Damremont, an officer of acknow- 
 ledged merit, who commanded at Marseilles, received
 
 186 MY ALLIANCE AND KUPTUEE 
 
 confidential orders to proceed to Algiers, and to hold 
 himself in readiness to assume the government of the 
 province if, as a rumour prevailed, Marshal Clauzel 
 should tender his resignation. 
 
 The Marshal, who I believe had never hesitated, 
 formed his resolution at once. Having reached Bona 
 during the last days of October, he wrote on the 1st 
 of November to General Rapatel, left in command at 
 Algiers : " Send me, by the return of the steam frigate, 
 the battalion of the 2nd light infantry commanded 
 by Changarnier, the officer I have remarked, and who 
 I promoted to be a lieutenant-colonel some months 
 since." General Rapatel obeyed his orders; the Com- 
 mandant Changarnier arrived at Bona with his bat- 
 talion, and on the 13th of November 1836, Marshal 
 Clauzel, taking mth him 7000 men of all arms, with 
 2000 native auxiliaries, and leaving at Bona a gar- 
 rison of 2000, already stricken by the autumnal 
 fevers, began his march towards Constantine. 
 
 For several days before his departure, the weather 
 was dreadful ; the rain fell in a deluge, the plains were 
 inundated, the snow covered the mountains. " These 
 are not the long rains of winter, but only fertilizing 
 showers which soon pass over," exclaimed those who 
 were enthusiastic in hope. " I have confidence in the 
 troops," wrote the Marshal; "I hope to inspire them 
 with the same sentiment, and I depart for Constantine, 
 Avhere I shall soon arrive." A few less sanguine 
 spirits, particularly in the military administration, 
 participated not in this feeling, and betrayed many 
 doubts as to the facility of the enterprise, the aj^tness
 
 WITH M. MOLE. 187 
 
 of the moment, and the extent of our resources. But 
 the greater part of those present persuaded themselves 
 that they were entering on an expedition of assured 
 success, and ahnost on a party of pleasure. Much 
 reliance was placed on the assertions and promises of 
 Youssouf ; he was already looked upon and treated as 
 a powerful Bey ; some officers only complained of the 
 prospect that not a shot would be exchanged. The 
 sun had reappeared, and seemed to confirm by its 
 brilliancy these flattering expectations. The troops 
 marched, the advanced guard on the 9th of November, 
 Marshal Clauzel on the 13th. They had scarcely 
 been in movement for twenty-four hours when the 
 rain recommenced ; the rivulets became torrents ; the 
 soldiers advanced laboriously; many fell behind; 
 already some of the Arab auxiliaries deserted, carry- 
 ing away a small but precious portion of the very 
 limited supplies of the expedition. But the fine 
 weather returned ; for five days the army proceeded 
 without suffering and without resistance ; but on the 
 19th of November, when it reached the high table- 
 lands in the vicinity of Constantine, rain, snow, hail, 
 and cold once more came on with violence ; the 
 soldiers were unable to find on that fertile but denuded 
 soil a morsel of wood to cook their rations or dry 
 their clothes. At each passage of a torrent, at every 
 bivouac, numbers of men were left behind, perishing 
 of cold and fatigue, with spoiled or abandoned provi- 
 sions. " We were there exposed," said Marshal 
 Clauzel in his report, " to all the rigours of a winter 
 in St. Petersburg, while the ground, entirely broken
 
 188 MY ALLIANCE AND RUPTURE 
 
 ujD, recalled to the old officers the mud of Warsaw." 
 On the 21st of November, the army at length ar- 
 rived before Constantine. The strength of the place 
 was instantly perceived, and how little it thought of 
 surrendermg. The red flag of the Arabs floated 
 upon the principal battery. As soon as our troops 
 were within range, a lively cannonade issued from the 
 ramparts. Achmet Bey, at the head of a numerous 
 cavalry, held the open country, and advanced to 
 attack the brigade of our advanced guard, which, 
 under the orders of General de Rigny, had occupied 
 the eminences {mamelons) of Koudiat-Aly, in sight 
 of the gate of Bab-el-Ouad. A bold and renowned 
 Kabyle chief, Ben-Aissa, commanded in the to'wn, as 
 the Bey's lieutenant. He executed a sortie with the 
 Turkish garrison, and joined in the attack on the 
 same brigade. The Arab horsemen and Turkish in- 
 fantry were valiantly repulsed, but mthout any other 
 result. Our forces were too weak to invest the place ; 
 no symptom of capitulation appeared; our ammuni- 
 tion and provisions were rapidly diminishing. Mar- 
 shal Clauzel resolved to attempt a vigorous assault 
 against the gates before which the two divisions of 
 his small army were encamped, — the only chance, if 
 there existed one at all, of carrying the place. The 
 Rummel, and the ravine at the bottom of wliich it 
 runs, separated the div^sions. On the 23rd, at three 
 in the afternoon, a soldier swam across the river, 
 carrying, in a small piece of oilcloth wrapped round 
 his head, the following note from the Marshal: — 
 " General de Bigny, at midnight I shall attack the
 
 WITH M. MOLE. 189 
 
 gate of El-Kantara ; you mil assail that of Koudiat- 
 Aly." The two attacks, one led by the Marshal in 
 person and General Trezel, the other by General de 
 Rigny and Lieutenant- Colonel Duvivier, were made 
 with determined vigour, but without success. In the 
 first, General Trezel, " who exposed himself," said the 
 Marshal's report, " to the hottest fire, to regulate and 
 encourage the troops," fell by a ball which passed 
 through his neck. In the second. Lieutenant- Colon el 
 Duvivier was for a moment on the point of gaining 
 the place, but all who surrounded him, officers and 
 soldiers, were struck down and compelled to retire. 
 " By three in the morning the struggle had ceased," 
 said one of the brave men present ; " the ordinary 
 silence was resumed, when the usual signal for the 
 last nocturnal prayer issued from the mmaret of the 
 principal mosque of Constantine. Verses of the 
 Koran, borne through the air, were repeated on the 
 ramparts by thousands of calm, resolute, and con- 
 fident voices. Our soldiers felt themselves compelled 
 to esteem their enemies." 
 
 At the same moment, under the Marshal's direction, 
 and in the obscurity of the night, the separated divi- 
 sions of the army placed themselves in motion to 
 unite in a single column, and to commence a retreat, 
 now evidently inevitable. The two corps formed pre- 
 cipitately; the ambulances were hastily loaded -with 
 wounded men, picked up on the very instant from 
 the ground on which they had fought, and with their 
 hurts scarcely bandaged. The assembly of all the 
 troops on the point fixed by the Marshal was not yet
 
 190 MY ALLIANCE AND RUPTURE 
 
 completed wlien the sun rose. The garrison of Con- 
 stantine, apprised by the sentinels on the ramparts, 
 issued forth in detachments continually increasing in 
 strength, and eager to push forward their attacks. In 
 the midst of this disciplined agitation, the Commandant 
 Changarnier, who covered with his battalion the march 
 of the division conducted by General de Rigny to- 
 wards the point of concentration indicated by the 
 Marshal, perceived thirty or forty soldiers running 
 across the front of the Arabs in an attempt to rejoin 
 the French column. It was an outpost that had been 
 forgotten. Facing instantly about, Colonel Chan- 
 garnier led on his battalion to the charge, for the 
 rescue of these lost men, and recovered nearly all, but 
 not without losing a few of his own. Then haltuig 
 at intervals, as the ground favoured him, he re- 
 peatedly checked the Arabs, obstinate in pursuit, 
 and thus gained for the different corps sufficient 
 tune to unite and reorganize, according to the ]\Iar- 
 shal's orders, in a column of retreat. Towards eleven 
 the combined march began ; the battalion of the 2nd 
 light infantry continued to cover it ; the entire cavalry 
 of Achmet Bey appeared to be prej^aring for a general 
 charge. As soon as he saw their approach. Colonel 
 Chano-arnier threw his battalion into a square, ex- 
 claiming, " Soldiers, look on those men ; they are 
 6000 and you are 300 ; you see readily that the game 
 is unequal." Then, when the cloud of Arab pur- 
 suers approached within twenty paces, he ordered a 
 close, point-blank fire from two ranks, with loud 
 shouts of " Long live the King ! " His small force
 
 WITH M. MOLE. 191 
 
 strewed the soil mtli men and horses. The Arabs 
 wheeled rapidly round. The Turkish garrison, which 
 had issued from Constantine without proAdsions, re- 
 turned to take their first meal. The French column 
 continued its march in good order; on the close of 
 that day, the 24th of jSTovember, when the battalion 
 of the 2nd light infantry took its place in the bivouac, 
 it was received with prolonged acclamations by the 
 whole army, and Marshal Clauzel himself addressed 
 the most cordial congratulations to Colonel Chan- 
 garnier. On the following morning, the 25th of 
 November, the march was resumed, and for five days 
 the retreat went on, incessantly harassed by the Ka- 
 byles, distressed by the scarcity of provisions, and 
 saddened by fatal incidents and deplorable losses; 
 but directed by Marshal Clauzel "svith the resolute 
 activity and firmness of soul which inspire troops 
 with confidence in their leader, resignation under 
 sufi*erings, and ardour . in peril. On the 1st of De- 
 cember the little force reached Bona. Marshal 
 Clauzel and the Duke of Nemours left that place on 
 the 6tli for Algiers, and on the 22nd the young 
 Prince re-entered Paris, esteemed by the whole army 
 for the calm courage he had evinced in his unassuming 
 character of volunteer, and prepared to lay before 
 the Kmg his father, with scrupulous reserve, a recital 
 of the mistakes, misfortunes, and heroic deeds of 
 which he had been a witness. 
 
 I cannot here deny myself the satisfaction of paying 
 a particular homage to one of the chiefs of that 
 expedition. General Trezel, my friend, and, in 1847,
 
 192 MY ALLIANCE AND KUPTURE 
 
 my colleague as minister of War. This brave man, 
 as virtuous as he was valiant, had long served in 
 Algeria, and there, as elsewhere, had won a dis- 
 tinguished reputation for both qualities. But after 
 the check he sustained, on the 28th of June 1835, at 
 La Macta, against Abd-el-Kader, he himself requested 
 Marshal Maison to recall him; "for," said he, with 
 rare candour, " I can no longer promise myself the 
 confidence of the troops, and I shall submit without 
 a murmur to the full censure and severity which the 
 King's government may think I have deserved, hoping 
 that it will not refuse to reward the brave men who 
 have distinguished themselves in these two combats." 
 Nevertheless, this reverse, so nobly avowed, weighed 
 cruelly on him, and his heart was fixed on finding, 
 by still serving in Algeria, a chance of repairing it. 
 Being called in 1836 to the command of Bona, he 
 naturally took part in the expedition to Constantine, 
 and directed, under Marshal. Clauzel, the second 
 division of that small army. Arrived before Con- 
 stantine, he saw at once that with such scanty means 
 of attack there was no probability of success against 
 serious resistance. An assault was however spoken 
 of, and while it was preparing, he said to his young- 
 orderly ofiicer, to whom he bore confidence and 
 friendship, " My dear Morny, there are no human 
 means of entering into that town; many of us -wnll 
 be killed under its walls ; should I be amongst the 
 numljcr, which is probable, try to convey to my ^vife 
 what may yet remain of me. You will find in 
 my pocket a note for 500 francs; it is nearly all the
 
 WITH M. MOLE. 193 
 
 money I now have." During the night of the 23rd 
 or 24th of November, when Marshal Clauzel endea- 
 voured to force the gates of El-Kantara and Bab-el- 
 Oued, General Trezel, entrusted with the attack on 
 the first, approached close to the rampart, vnth M. de 
 Morny by his side. The moon shone brightly ; they 
 were fired on. " My dear General," said the young 
 officer, "if we remain here we shall both infallibly 
 be killed ; as for me, I should be no great loss, but 
 if, as I scarcely think, an assault will be attemj^ted, 
 it would be a sad pity if you were not there." At 
 this moment, some men of the engineers passed close 
 to them, leading a mule loaded with shovels and pick- 
 axes ; a soldier and the mule were killed. Turning 
 towards M. de Morny, General Trezel said to hun, 
 " I believe really you are in the right ; but where 
 can we place ourselves while waiting the assault?" 
 At the very instant he fell with his face on the 
 ground. On turning towards him, M. de Morny per- 
 ceived a stain of mud on, his temple, and thinking 
 him dead, exclaimed with some impatience, " There, 
 I told him so ; he is killed because he would not 
 listen to me ; what absurd courage ! " As he was 
 endeavouring, with the aid of some soldiers, to place 
 him in a blanket to carry oiF his body, the general 
 came to himself and said, " Well ! what has hap- 
 pened ?" "How, General, you are not dead ? what 
 happiness ! " "I only fainted, and was unable to 
 speak ; but I heard you grumble and say I was dead : 
 I had only one anxiety ; the fear of being left there." 
 He was taken to the ambulance. A ball had gone 
 VOL. IV. o
 
 194 MY ALLIANCE AND RUPTURE 
 
 through his neck, but being very small, it passed be- 
 tween the vertebra}, throat, and the carotid artery. 
 A musket ball would have killed him. He made the 
 retreat in Marshal Clauzel's calash, as calm and 
 thinking as little of himself as he had been under the 
 ramparts of Constantine. I take pleasure in record- 
 ing these reminiscences of that modest and incor- 
 ruptible servant of France. He had an indomitable 
 heart in a mean and insignificant body. To the 
 manly and, at the same time, diffident sunplicity of a 
 soldier more practised in obedience and command 
 than in discussion, he joined the respectful patriotism 
 of a citizen devoted to order and to the laws. He 
 had some of the prejudices but none of the weak- 
 nesses of his time. His firmness was not always 
 exempt from obstinacy, but when he deceived him- 
 self, no personal view, no sentiment of doubtful 
 purity mingled with his error. Duty was his law and 
 devotedness his passion. Wliether it were necessary 
 to compromise or to reserve himself, to mount to the 
 assault, or to retire from the world, neither emer- 
 gency found him hesitating, and he was equally pre- 
 pared for the efi'ort or the sacrifice. He has not 
 won the reno^vn of the Catinats and Faberts, and 
 he had neither their fortune nor genius in war ; 
 but in soul he was of their race, and I only render 
 him justice when I place him by their side. I return 
 to Marshal Clauzel, and to the consequences of this 
 unfortunate canapaign. 
 
 In the Chambers it became the subject of long 
 debates. The Marshal himself took part in them,
 
 WITH M. MOLE. 195 
 
 without skill and with no just comprehension of his 
 own or of the general position. He was a warrior 
 eminent on the field of battle, but he continued what 
 the revolution and the empire had made him, a 
 patriot with habitual notions of Adolence and des- 
 potism, loving the greatness of France, and ever 
 ready to serve her with his sword ; but a stranger to 
 all other political views, and to every sentiment of 
 resj)onsibility in the bosom of liberty. He had been 
 obviously unprovident, presumptuous, light, too little 
 occupied with the fate of the men he commanded, 
 seeking pre-eminently his personal success, no matter 
 how weak were the chances, or how costly the price 
 at which it might be purchased. When he arrived 
 at Bona, under the shock of his repulse, and anxious 
 to soften the displeasure of the cabinet, he wrote con- 
 fidentially to General Bernard, while forwarding his 
 official report : "I shall declare to the government, 
 when it will and how it will, that the troops under my 
 command were sufficient for the expedition, and I 
 should either have taken or forced Constantine to 
 surrender, with a portion of those who were reduced 
 to a state of annihilation by the bad weather, if that 
 portion could have been united with the rest." When 
 the day of public debate came on, he could only 
 defend himself by accusing the government of with- 
 holding from him the necessary forces, and of pre- 
 paring to abandon Algeria; an absurd accusation, for 
 the cabinet comprised none of the men who had suf- 
 fered such an inclination to escape them; and I, 
 on the contrary, was one of those who, on every 
 
 o 2
 
 196 MY ALLIANCE AND RUPTURE 
 
 occasion, had most strenuously advocated the main- 
 tenance and future of our possessions in Africa. 
 But the charge of indifference to the national great- 
 ness was the popular theme of attack, and to that 
 Marshal Clauzel looked for his point of support. 
 While this debate was in progress, he had ceased for 
 two months to be governor-general of Algeria. Fully 
 determined to repair the check received by France 
 before Constantine, and not to incur again the risk 
 of the mistakes that had led to it, we had, on the 12th 
 of February, 1837, recalled Marshal Clauzel, appoint- 
 ing as his successor General de Damremont, whose 
 high military reputation and sound understandmg 
 promised us for the general administration of Al- 
 geria, as well as for the sj^ecial conduct of the new 
 expedition, the double guarantee of which we stood 
 in need.^ 
 
 The news of the disaster produced a lively emotion 
 in France, which would have been even more painful, 
 had it not been preceded and diverted by another 
 excitement, arising from an incident of a different 
 character. At the precise moment when Marshal 
 Clauzel reached Bona, and was preparing to set out 
 for Constantine, Prince Louis Bonaparte entered 
 Strasbourg, and endeavoured by a military insurrec- 
 tion to overthrow the King and the Charter of 1830. 
 
 On the evening of the 31st of October, the Minister 
 
 1 I insert amongst the "Historic Documents" (No. X.), a letter 
 ■which General Damremont transmitted to me from Marseilles, on 
 the lOtli of December, 1836, before the failure of the expedi- 
 tion against Constantine was known, and in which, from that date, 
 he explained his views as to Algeria.
 
 WITH M. MOLE. 197 
 
 of the Interior, M. de Gasparin, brought to me a 
 telegraphic disptatch which he had just received from 
 Strasbourg, dated on the preceding eve the 30th, and 
 which ran thus : — 
 
 " This morning, about six o'clock, Louis Napoleon, 
 son of the Duchess of St. Leu, icho had in his co7i- 
 Jidence the Colonel of Artillery Yaudrey, traversed the 
 streets of Strasbourg with a party of . . ." 
 
 The despatch stopped there, and the director of 
 the telegraphic lines, M. Alphonse Foy, had added 
 to it this note : " The words underlined are doubtful. 
 The mist which has enveloped the line neither allows 
 us to receive the end of the dispatch nor to clear up 
 the dubious passage." 
 
 We repaired instantly to the Tuileries, where, 
 a few moments later, the entire cabinet assembled. 
 We conversed, we conjectured, we weighed chances, 
 we drew up eventual instructions, we discussed the 
 measures to be adopted under various hypotheses. 
 The Duke of Orleans prepared to leave us. We re- 
 mained there by the King nearly the whole night, 
 expecting news which arrived not. The- Queen, 
 Madame Adelaide, the Princes, went and came, de- 
 manding whether anything further had transpired. 
 We slept from lassitude, and woke from impatience. 
 I was struck by the sadness of the King, not that he 
 seemed uneasy or subdued, but uncertainty as to 
 the seriousness of the event occupied his thoughts; 
 and these reiterated conspiracies, these attemj^ts at 
 civil war, republican, legitimist, and Bonapartist, 
 this continual necessity of contending, repressing, and 
 
 o 3
 
 198 MY ALLIANCE AND RUPTURE 
 
 punishing, weighed on him as a hateful burden. 
 Despite his long experience and all that it had taught 
 him of man's passions and the vicissitudes of life, 
 he was and continued to be naturally easy, confiding, 
 benevolent, and hopeful. He grew tired of ha^dng 
 incessantly to watch, to defend himself, and of find- 
 ing so many enemies on his steps. 
 
 On the following morning, the 1st of November, 
 an aide-de-camp of General Voirol, commandant at 
 Strasbourg, brought us the end of the event, as also of 
 the telegraphic dispatch, and a detailed account of 
 the abortive attempt. From Switzerland where he 
 resided, and fi^om the waters of Baden to which he 
 often resorted. Prince Louis maintained in France, and 
 especially at Strasbourg, constant communications. 
 Neither amongst his adherents nor in himself did 
 anything promise encouraging chances of success. 
 A few old ofiicers, enthusiastic women without po- 
 sition in the world, retired functionaries out of em- 
 ployment, and scattered malcontents were not the 
 most elfective agents against a power which had 
 already lasted for six years; and which, in open day, 
 had conquered all its enemies, republicans, and legi- 
 timists, conspirators and insurgents. Prince Louis 
 was young, unknown in France by the army and by 
 the people. Nobody had seen him; he had done 
 nothing ; some essays on the military art, " Political 
 Reveries," a " Project for a Constitution ; " and the 
 praises of two or three democratic jom^nals were not 
 very powerful titles to the public favour and to the 
 government of France. He had his name, though
 
 WITH M. MOLE. 199 
 
 even his name had remamed barren under a concealed 
 and entirely personal force ; but he had faith in him- 
 self and in his destiny. While performmg his duties 
 as a captain of artillery in the Canton of Berne, and 
 while publishing his pamphlets on which France be- 
 stowed little thought, he looked upon himself as the 
 heir and representative, not only of a dynasty, but of 
 the two ideas which had constituted the strength of 
 that djmasty, — revolution without anarchy and mili- 
 tary fame. Under calm, gentle, and unassuming 
 manners, he combined, a little confusedly, an active 
 sympathy for revolutionary enterprises and inno- 
 vations, with the tastes and traditions of absolute 
 power; and the pride of an exalted race, united in 
 his mind with the ambitious instinct of a lofty future. 
 He felt himself a prince, and he believed, with in- 
 vincible confidence, that he was predestined to be an 
 emperor. It was with this sentiment and m this 
 faith that, on the 30th of October, 1836, at six in the 
 mornmg, without any other support than a colonel 
 and commandant of a battalion, pre^dously won 
 over to his cause, he traversed the streets of Stras- 
 bourg, and presented himself at the barracks of the 
 4tli Kegiment of Artillery, where, after two short 
 addresses by Colonel Yaudrey and himself, he was 
 received with shouts of Long live the Emperor ! At 
 the same moment some of his partisans repaired to 
 the residences of the general commanding and the 
 prefect, and, failing to persuade them, left them in- 
 sufficiently guarded in their hotels. On arriving at 
 the second barrack, which he proposed to carry, the 
 
 o 4
 
 200 MY ALLIANCE AND KUPTUKE 
 
 barrack Finckmall, occupied by the 4:6tli Regiment 
 of Infantry of the Line, Prince Louis encountered a 
 different reception. Forewarned in time, Lieutenant- 
 Colonel Talendier resolutely repulsed all efforts to 
 seduce the fidelity of the soldiers. Colonel Paillot 
 and the other officers of the regiment arrived, equally 
 loyal and determined. On the spot itself, the Prince 
 and those who accompanied him were arrested. The 
 report spread rapidly, and the insurrectionary move- 
 ments attempted in several corps, and on various 
 points of the city, ceased on the instant. The 
 General and Prefect had recovered their liberty, and 
 took the necessary measures. Of the known ad- 
 herents of Prince Louis in this enterprise of a few 
 hours, one alone, M. de Persigny, his confidant and 
 most intimate friend, effected his escape. The au- 
 thorities of Strasbourg, when sending their reports 
 to the King's government, demanded instructions as 
 to the fate of the prisoners. 
 
 We learnt, at the same time, that on the same day, 
 the 30th of October, at Vendome, a corporal of the 
 1st Regiment of Hussars, in garrison at that town, 
 had assembled at a public-house some of his com- 
 rades, and that they there resolved to sound " boot 
 and saddle " the following night, to seize the officers, 
 the civil functionaries, and to proclaim the republic. 
 Being apprised while their meeting was still going on, 
 the Lieutenant-Colonel instantly arrested the corporal 
 and his accomplices. The corporal, after killing Avith 
 a pistol-shot a quarter-master who was guarding him, 
 escaped, wandered about during the Avhole day in the
 
 WITH M. MOLi. 201 
 
 environs of the town, and with a humbled spirit and 
 subdued heart returned at night to Yendome, to 
 surrender liimself. It has been frequently said, that 
 there was no connection whatever between this miser- 
 able bungle and the attempt of Strasbourg. The 
 coincidence unplies, and I have reason to believe, that 
 this conclusion is erroneous. 
 
 Our deliberation was short as to the conduct to be 
 adopted in regard to the prisoners. On ascertaining 
 the issue of the enterprise and the captivity of her 
 son, Queen Hortense hurried to France under an 
 assumed name, and pausing near Paris, at Viry, in 
 the house of the Duchess of Ragusa, from thence 
 addressed her maternal supplications to the King and 
 M. Mole. She might have spared them. The re- 
 solution of not bringing Prince Louis to trial, and of 
 sendino: him to the United States of America, was 
 already taken. This was the decided inclination of 
 the Kino;, and the unanimous advice of the Cabinet. 
 For myself, I had never served or lauded the Em- 
 jDcror Napoleon the First; but I respect greatness 
 and genius, even when I deplore their application, 
 and I cannot think that the claims of such a man to 
 the respect of the world descend with him into the 
 tomb. The heir to the name, and according to the 
 imperial system, to the throne of the Emperor Na- 
 poleon, had a right to be treated as of royal race, and 
 to be subjected only to the exigencies of pohcy. On 
 the 10th of November he was removed from the 
 citadel of Strasbourg, and taken by post to Paris, 
 where he passed several hours in the apartments of
 
 202 MY ALLIANCE AND RUPTURE 
 
 the Prefect of Police, being visited only by M. Ga- 
 briel Delessert. Departing immediately for L'Orient, 
 he arrived there on the night of the 13th or 14tli, 
 and was embarked on board the frigate. Andromede, 
 about to sail for Brazil, touching at New York. 
 "When the frigate was on the point of getting under 
 way, the sub-prefect of L'Orient, M. Villemain, while 
 pajdng his respects to Prince Louis, and before taking 
 leave of him, inquired if, on arriving in the United 
 States, he should find, at first, the resources he 
 might require. " None," replied the Prince. " Well 
 then, my Prince, the King has ordered me to place 
 in your hands fifteen thousand francs in gold, which 
 you will find in this little casket." The Prince took 
 the casket, the sub-prefect went ashore, and the frigate 
 sailed. 
 
 Twenty-five years (and what years!) have rolled 
 on since that epoch. Their instruction is clear. 
 Twice — in 1836 and in 1840, — mth the perseverance 
 of faith and enthusiasm. Prince Louis Napoleon en- 
 deavoured to overthrow the constitutional monarchy ; 
 both times he failed, and at the outset. Li 1851, he 
 destroyed the Republic at a blow, and since that 
 day has reigned over France. The constitutional 
 monarchy was a regular and free government, which 
 gave guarantees for the true and complete interests of 
 France. The France which desired this in 1789, in 
 1814, and in 1830, has never concurred frankly with 
 its destroyers, and submitted to its fall in 1848 with 
 astonishment and alarm. The Republic commenced 
 in 1848 by anarchy, and led to nothing else. France
 
 WITH M. MOLE. 203 
 
 accepted and supported the empire as a haven of 
 refuge against this anarchy. There are times when 
 nations are swayed pre-eminently by their ^vishes, 
 and others when they crouch signally under their 
 fears. As these dispositions prevail, they seek in 
 preference liberty or security. The first secret in 
 the art of government is, not to mistake the ruUng 
 desire of the people governed. 
 
 With respect to the accomplices of Prince Louis, 
 doubts arose as to the tribunal to which they were to 
 be committed. We decided for that which was not 
 the object of any popular objection, — the trial by 
 jury. This, I think, was a weakness and an error. 
 If ever enterprise bore the character of an attempt 
 against the safety of the state, it was assuredly this 
 of Strasbourg. It fell also, according to the Charter 
 and our constitutional traditions, under the privi- 
 leges of the House of Peers. The preceding cabinet 
 had recently sent before that court the assassin Ali- 
 baud, a matter in which there was no political com- 
 plication, and which involved no difficult question 
 either of principle or circumstance. That of the con- 
 spiracy of Strasbourg belonged much more naturally 
 to the same tribunal, and the step we had lately taken 
 with reference to Prince Louis furnished an ad- 
 ditional reason for sending his accomj^lices before the 
 Chamber of Peers ; for that court alone was capable 
 of appreciating the propriety of the step, and not 
 the less so of exercising equitable firmness in a ge- 
 neral judgment on the affair and its actors. As to 
 the inferior plot of Vendome, the course was clear.
 
 204 MY ALLIANCE AND RUPTUEE 
 
 Soldiers only were implicated in it, and they were 
 consigned to a court martial at Tours. 
 
 The session of the Chambers approached, and 
 seemed likely to open under varied auspices, mixed 
 with serene and cloudy prospects. Externally, the 
 general aspect of affairs presented nothing but what 
 was satisfactory. Peace was no longer endangered 
 from any quarter. The preceding dispute between 
 France and Switzerland on the subject of the re- 
 fugees, had led to a suspension of diplomatic relations 
 between the two countries ; but owing to the mode- 
 ration of both governments this alienation of good 
 neighbourship had ceased, the question was smoothed 
 down, intercourse was renewed, and the subordinate 
 incidents which had contributed to interrupt it no 
 longer retamed importance, except as supplying food 
 for the polemics of the opposition. While declming 
 intervention in Spain, we continued to fulfil, not only 
 scrupulously but zealously, the treaty of the Qua- 
 druple Alliance, and afforded to the government of 
 Queen Isabella all the indirect support we could 
 supply without engaging the French flag in her ser- 
 vice. This policy produced its fruits. The Carlists 
 protracted the civil war beyond the Pyrenees without 
 decisive success. In spite of their local victories and 
 their irruptions through Spain, the constitutional 
 monarchy held its ground, obstinately and effectually 
 defended. The Spanish radical party, possessed of 
 power, felt the responsibility which weighed heavily 
 and exclusively on their shoulders, and gradually 
 became enlightened and moderate in their rule.
 
 WITH M. MOLi. 205 
 
 The new Cortes confirmed the regency of Queen 
 Christina, and were preparing modifications in the 
 constitution of 1812, calculated to render it less 
 dangerous to order and monarchy. By recognising 
 the independence of the American republics, the 
 Spanish government escaped from a weighty burden, 
 and placed itself in a condition to use all its energies 
 for the pacification of Spain herself. The confi- 
 dential negociations carrying on at Berlin and 
 Schwerin for the marriage of the Duke of Orleans 
 mth the Princess Helena of Mecklenburg promised 
 a successful issue. Taking all things together, 
 M. Mole after some months of administration, pre- 
 sented himself to the Chambers, having faithfully and 
 prudently put in practice the maxuns in the name 
 of which the cabinet had been formed, and having 
 already gathered from them flattering results. But 
 internally, the position was more complicated and less 
 promising. The expedition to Constantine and the 
 attempt at Strasbourg weighed on us, leaving serious 
 questions to be settled and difiicult duties to be dis- 
 charged, which could not fail to excite animated 
 debates. 
 
 On the 27th of December the King repaired to 
 the Palais Bourbon, along the quay of the Tuileries, 
 to open the session. The second legion of the Na- 
 tional Guard, which lined the road, lowered their 
 colours before him: he moved forward beyond the 
 door of the carriage to return the salute ; a shot was 
 fired; the ball grazed the King's chest, passed be- 
 tween his two sons, the Duke of Nemours and the
 
 206 MY ALLIANCE AND RUPTURE 
 
 Prince of Joinville, who, with the Duke of Orleans, 
 were seated with him, and smashed a window on the 
 opposite side, the fragments of which slightly wounded 
 the two princes. The assassin was instantly seized, 
 mth great difficulty extricated from the indignation 
 of the populace, and carried, in the first instance, to 
 the guard-house of the Tuileries. The train con- 
 tinued its course, the King showed himself again at 
 the carriage window, replying with his hand to the 
 acclamations which greeted his passage. He arrived 
 at the Palais Bourbon, where the Queen, Madame 
 Adelaide, the Princess Marie, the Princess Clemen- 
 tine, the Duke of Aumale, and the Duke of Mont- 
 pensier, awaited his coming in the gallery of the 
 royal family. The report of the attempted assassina- 
 tion had already spread through the hall; anxious 
 and hesitating looks were turned towards the Queen; 
 all sat motionless and silent, as if anxious not to 
 excite her first alarm by visible emotion. The Com- 
 mandant Dumas, despatched on the instant by the 
 King, appeared in the tribune, and said to the Queen, 
 " Madame, the King is well, he is on the point of 
 arriving; the Princes are unwounded." They fol- 
 lowed without delay. The King ascended the estrade 
 and sat down. His three sons remained standing by 
 his side : some drops of blood stained their clothes. 
 For several minutes the cheers were enthusiastically 
 renewed, the whole assembly on theu' feet, members 
 of the Chambers and spectators crying " Long live the 
 King ! " and turning alternately from his Majesty to 
 the Queen. I never witnessed a disj)lay of public
 
 ATITH M. MOLE. 207 
 
 emotion more animated and sympathetic. The King, 
 with unaffected self-possession, delivered a calm ad- 
 dress, filled with confidence for the future of France, 
 and only slightly alluding, in a few words, to the 
 recent attempt to which he had been exposed. " Sup- 
 ported by your loyal co-operation," he said, in con- 
 clusion, "I have been enabled to preserve our country 
 from new revolutions, and to save the sacred depo- 
 sitory of our institutions. Let us continue to in- 
 crease our united efforts; with every successive day 
 we shall witness the augmentation and firm esta- 
 blishment of order, confidence, and prosperity; and 
 we shall obtain all the advantages a free country has 
 a right to look for, which lives in peace under the 
 aegis of a national government." 
 
 I saw and interrogated the assassin. He was a 
 young man of coarse and vulgar appearance, rude 
 and embarrassed, dogged rather than excited, an- 
 swering questions curtly, with as little intelligence 
 as emotion, as if desirous of hearing nothing more 
 said on what he had done, and rejecting with stupid 
 pride every appeal to repentance. It was soon found 
 that his name was Meunier, that he led an idle and 
 unsettled life, sometimes as an inferior clerk, at others 
 as a workman, and that he was nephew to an honest 
 merchant of Paris, who, recognising him with bitter 
 mortification, spoke of him to the investigating ma- 
 gistrates as of a weak, unsettled character, addicted 
 to bad habits, vicious reading, engaged in secret so- 
 cieties, and incapable of resisting the influence of his 
 associates. The ofiicial examination and report fully
 
 208 MY ALLIANCE AND RUPTURE 
 
 confirmed these statements. From routine, rather 
 than from a just estimate of the circumstances, Meu- 
 nier was sent before the Court of Peers. A few days 
 after his attempt, the police discovered and seized, in 
 the house of a mechanician named Champion, an 
 infernal machine, fully prepared. Being instantly 
 arrested, with three others compromised by the first 
 interrogatories, the mechanician strangled himself in 
 prison. 
 
 It was under the imj^ression of these sinister inci- 
 dents that the first acts of the Chambers, the prepa- 
 ration and discussion of their addresses, were carried 
 out. There are salutary alarms and vexations ; these 
 latter were not, as I think, without their influence on 
 the character of the ensuing debate, which was un- 
 usually grave and restrained. Parties still found 
 therein an opportunity of repeating their ordinary 
 assertions and accusations. Some again told us, 
 with regard to Spain, that we attempted an impos- 
 sibility in seeking to establish order with liberty by 
 the hands of a power the offspring of revolution: 
 others, — that since 1830, there had been no essential 
 difference between the various cabinets and their 
 policy; that a single will governed, in a single and 
 uniform system, and that, from this will and this 
 system, neither France nor Spain could expect any 
 good result. These worn out and monotonous attacks 
 had little effect on the Chamber of Deputies, which 
 bestowed scanty attention on them; and the debate, 
 laying aside revolutionaiy themes, concentrated itself 
 in the question essentially political, — namely, in the
 
 WITH M. MOLE. 209 
 
 controversy between the two cabinets of the 2ncl of 
 February and the 6th of September, which had 
 formed opposite opinions on the interests and duties 
 of France in her relations with Spain, and one of 
 which advocated direct intervention, while the other 
 limited itself to indirect assistance. M. Thiers, 
 M. Passy, M. Sauzet, and M. Odilon Barrot, on the 
 one side, — M. Mole, M. Hebert, M. de Remusat, and 
 myself, on the other, discussed, for four days, these 
 opposite lines of policy, seriously, energetically, and 
 sometimes even with a degree of acrimony, but with- 
 out violence or subterfuge, with convictions and fore- 
 thought equally sincere though essentially diiferent, 
 like men who can bear the weight of power under the 
 eyes of their adversaries, free in spirit, and expect- 
 ing the judgment of their country. No unforeseen 
 deviation, no intemperate incident disturbed the de- 
 bate; the Chamber was enabled to determine the 
 points at issue in perfect freedom ajid tranquillity of 
 argument. It pronounced a verdict in favour of the 
 opponents of direct intervention, and events confirmed 
 the decision. France abstained from interfering in 
 Spain; nevertheless, Don Carlos was driven out, the 
 constitutional government and Queen Isabella re- 
 mained erect, and when France, to substantiate the 
 policy she had always proclaimed, had occasion to 
 appeal to the confidence and friendship of Spain, of 
 her Queen, her Cortes, and her ministers, that confi- 
 dence and friendship were not withheld. 
 
 A trifling fact in this debate, scarcely noticed by 
 the public, nevertheless deserves to be recalled, as, 
 
 VOL. IV. p
 
 210 MY ALLIANCE AND RUPTURE 
 
 for some time, it was not without influence on our 
 external position. During the sitting of the 14th of 
 January 1837, in the Chamber of Deputies, while 
 speaking of the danger on account of which our in- 
 tervention in Spain was specially demanded, namely, 
 the probability that absolutism would triumph Avith 
 Don Carlos, M. j\Iole uttered this sentence, Avhich, 
 being in a Avritten speech, was textually copied in 
 the " Moniteur : " " We detest absolutism, and pity the 
 nations who are so little aware of their own strength 
 as to submit to it." If M. Mole had spoken to 
 France alone, his words would have been received, 
 at that time, mth almost unqualified approbation ; 
 but all Europe heard him, and diplomatists are as 
 susceptible as they outwardly appear indifferent; and 
 there was something of forgetfulness in a minister of 
 Foreign Aifairs speaking thus openly before the sub- 
 jects of absolute governments with whom we were 
 living, and -wished to live, on friendly terms. The 
 ambassadors of Austria and Russia vehemently re- 
 sented this language. They interchanged sentiments 
 bitterly in their private conversations, and Avrote to 
 their courts saying that the words implied " an 
 appeal to rebellion addressed to all nations." Nothing 
 could be more remote from M. Mole's idea; but his 
 usually clear and well-governed mind had not always, 
 when he spoke in public, an exact appreciation of the 
 bearing of his words, and he was sometimes uncon- 
 scious of their full effect. Those we have alluded 
 to infused for several months a degree of suspicion 
 and coldness into his relations Avith more than one
 
 WITH M. MOLE. 
 
 211 
 
 of the great powers and their representatives in 
 Paris. 
 
 In ^vinding up this great debate we touched on 
 the quarrel with Switzerland as to the refugees ; and 
 the expedition to Constantine was also introduced, 
 but in a secondary light. The Swiss question was 
 settled. The opposition expatiated with complaisance 
 on a police incident connected with it ; but the pre- 
 ceding minister of the Interior, the Count de IMonta- 
 livet, with loyal courage, assumed the responsibility, 
 and deprived the attack of its direct object and 
 interest. On the expedition to Constantine all dis- 
 cussion was postponed for the present, it being de- 
 stined to form the subject of a special inquiry and 
 report in connection with the bill for supplementary 
 credits. Two matters alone, the Spanish intervention 
 and the conspiracy of Strasbourg, materially occupied 
 the Chambers and the public. Precisely as the Cham- 
 ber of Deputies pronounced on the first by voting 
 its address, we were informed that in the court of 
 assizes at Colmar the jury had decided the second 
 by a full acquittal of all the accused. The absence 
 of the principal author of the attempt, and the step 
 which had liberated him from prosecution, had sup- 
 plied the defenders of his accomplices ^vith the argu- 
 ment, and party passions with the pretext, which 
 led to such a defeat of truth and law. The two 
 leadino; advocates, M. Ferdinand Barrot and M. Pas- 
 quier, summed up their whole pleading in this unique 
 and specious manner of acting upon minds, some 
 of which were weak and intimidated, others sanguine
 
 212 MY ALLIANCE AND rxUPTURE 
 
 and determined beforehand. " Gentlemen," said 
 M. Ferdinand Barrot, " there was a prince amongst 
 the accused, and, to use the terms of the indictment, 
 royal clemency has set him at liberty, thus adding a 
 noble action to your history. As I arrived here, this 
 prince was approaching the soil of America, for him 
 the land of hope and happiness. Already his spirit 
 is more calm and peaceable ; he breathes in tran- 
 quillity ; already a mother can console him and dry 
 the tears her child has shed. But behold, on this side, 
 the sorrows and anguish of captivity, the accumula- 
 tion of misfortunes ! You, citizens, the organs of law 
 and not the supporters of force, you will prove your- 
 selves worthy of the mission confided to you. You 
 will acquit, and your sentence will inscribe itself in 
 the fairest ^^ages of our judicial annals, for there is a 
 principle established in our habits ; it is this, ' equal 
 justice to all.' " Under the shadow of this strange 
 oblivion of facts, and of a confusion of ideas and duties 
 not less extraordinar}^, the Bonapartist and revolu- 
 tionary opposition, which had many adherents in 
 Alsace, displayed itself mth passionate boldness. It 
 filled the hall of trial, crying out to the jiny from all 
 sides as they retired to deliberate, " Acquit them ! 
 acquit them ! " and when the verdict of acquittal was 
 declared, the transports which burst forth, and the 
 rejoicings that followed, far exceeded the expression 
 of sympathetic pity ; they amounted to an explosion 
 of the triumph and hopes of a party. 
 
 It would have been the height of blindness and 
 imbecility to have mistaken the grave importance of
 
 WITH M. MOLE. 213 
 
 this position, and the duties *it imposed on us. In 
 the prosecution and repression of political conspiracies 
 and outrages, the King's government had, from the 
 beginning, practised a degree of persevering mo- 
 deration and gentleness, to which, I do not hesitate 
 to say, no parallel can be found in history. In no 
 instance had any offence of this exclusive character, 
 and untainted by any other crime, been followed by 
 the infliction of capital punishment. On the pre- 
 ceding eve, when we learned that the court-martial 
 at Tours had condemned Corporal Bruyant, the author 
 of the insurrection of Vendome, to death, the King 
 commuted his sentence to deportation. By simply 
 banishing Prince Louis Napoleon to the United States, 
 he had performed an act of noble and intelligent 
 equity. And this very act was taken advantage" of 
 to weaken his government, by withholding from it, in 
 spite of the evidence of facts, the commonest protection 
 of the laws, while, even in the bosom of the army, in- 
 subordination and defection were encourao;ed. We 
 should have blushed for ourselves if we had accepted, 
 in scandalous sloth, these victories of party passions 
 over public duties ; these legal falsehoods, this weak- 
 ness of moral habits, from which hostile factions could 
 not fail to extract increased confidence and audacity. 
 After mature deliberation, and with one accord, we 
 presented three distinct bills to the Chambers, to mo- 
 dify or complete the penal code, and to prevent, as far 
 as the power of the laws could extend, a repetition of 
 similar disorders. The object of the first was to 
 render the penalty of transportation efficacious, by 
 
 p 3
 
 214 MY ALLIANCE AND RUPTURE 
 
 making it real. A pla<fe was fixed on, in a particular 
 district of the Isle of Bourbon, where the punishment 
 was to be undergone, and the necessary funds were 
 allocated for that establishment. The second enume- 
 rated certain crimes and offences named in the penal 
 code and subsequent laws, and provided that, in case 
 of i^articipation and complicity between soldiers and 
 civilians, the prosecutions should be distinct, and the 
 soldiers handed over to courts-martial, while the 
 civilians were delivered to the ordinary tribunals. 
 The third restored three articles of the penal code of 
 1810, and punished, with certain legal exceptions, the 
 non-revelation of j^lots formed and crimes projected 
 against the life or person of the King. The first two 
 of these biUs were presented to the Chamber of De- 
 puties, and the third to the Chamber of Peers. 
 
 We did not confine ourselves to these directly re- 
 pressive measures. We resolved to deal with a 
 question which had remained in suspense since 1830, 
 and one of great, though indirect im2:>ortance, as re- 
 garded the monarchy, — the question of dotation to 
 the different branches of the royal family, an element 
 of monarchical stability, and consequently of strength. 
 This subject had hitherto been considered so delicate, 
 so many attacks had already been launched against 
 it by the opposition, and so many prejudices spread 
 amongst the public, that, since 1832, no succeeding 
 cabinet had ventured to ask from the Chambers the 
 allocation of one million, which, according to the terms 
 of the treaty concluded between France and Belgium 
 on the 28th of Jul}- in that year, should have been pro-
 
 WITH M. MOLE. 215 
 
 posed in the following session, as a dowiy for the Prin- 
 cess Louisa, who had become Queen of the Belgians. 
 On the 26th of January 1837, we presented two bills to 
 the Chamber of Deputies, one to fulfil the engagement 
 contracted with the King of the Belgians, the other 
 assigning to the Duke of Nemours, who had reached 
 his majority in the preceding year, the domain of 
 Rambouillet, with certain portions of the state forests. 
 On these two bills, particularly the last, we did 
 not in the slightest degree deceive ourselves as to the 
 obstacles they would encounter and the contests they 
 would excite. The most inveterate enemies of King 
 Louis-Philippe would hesitate to repeat to-day, with 
 regard to his personal fortune, and his avidity in mat- 
 ters of private interest, the inconceivable errors and 
 odious calumnies of which that prince has been the 
 object. The facts, accounts, papers, all the details 
 and documents of his private life, have been exposed 
 to the most complete and unlooked-for publicity, and 
 submitted to the most rigorous investigation. This 
 trial has redounded to his honour, and the falsehoods 
 which were heaped round his throne have vanished 
 before his tomb. But in 1837 these lies were uni- 
 versally spread abroad, hawked about, and credited. 
 Many who retailed, believed them. Those who taxed 
 them with exaggeration and hostility were scarcely 
 certain of their own thoughts, and amongst the rejec- 
 ters some were not without a measure of uneasiness. 
 King Louis-Philippe was himself one of the chief 
 causes of this state of feeling. No prince, I would 
 even say voluntarily, no man has more frequently con- 
 
 p 4
 
 216 MY ALLIANCE AND RUPTURE 
 
 veyed the semblance of faults he possessed not, and of 
 errors he never committed. He had been a partici- 
 pator in so many unforeseen disasters, had lived in 
 the midst of so many ruins, and had himself suiFered 
 so many privations, that he ever retained an extreme 
 mistrust of the future, and a lively apprehension of 
 the fatal chances which might still reach him and 
 his family. At one time he recalled, with just 
 pride, the days of his wandering and impoverished 
 life ; at another he spoke of it with a bitter reminis- 
 cence, and a presentiment filled Avith alarm. In 
 September 1843, during the first visit of Queen Vic- 
 toria to the Chateau d'Eu, while walking one day in 
 the garden of the castle, in front of some wall-trees 
 covered ^vith fine peaches, the King gathered one and 
 ofi^ered it to the Queen, who wished to eat it, but was 
 at a loss how to peel ofi* the skin. The King took 
 a small knife from his* pocket, saying, "One who has 
 been a poor devil like me, living on forty sous a day, 
 always carries a knife ! " And he joined in the 
 general smile at this allusion to his poverty. On an- 
 other occasion I happened to be alone Avith the King. 
 He spoke to me of his domestic position, of the future 
 of his family, of the chances that still weighed upon 
 them ; and he grew warm while entering into the de- 
 tail of his expenses, his debts, and the absurdities in 
 which people indulged as to his property. He took 
 me suddenly by both hands, and said with extreme 
 emotion, " I tell you, my dear mhiister, that my 
 children Avill want bread." When under the empire of 
 this feeling, lie anxiously souglit, for himself and for
 
 WITH M. MOLE. 217 
 
 those belono-mo; to him, some 2:uarantees for the future, 
 and at the same time expressed his solicitudes and 
 complaints mth a freedom and intemperance of lan- 
 guage which sometimes astonished his friendly audi- 
 tors, supplied his enemies "with suspicions in support 
 of their credulity or inventions, and inspired the public 
 "svith that mistrustful bias against whicli we had to 
 contend when, in the name of justice and sound policy, 
 we asked for the dotations which the King seemed to 
 solicit as a greedy and anxious plaintiff. 
 
 We did not therefore feel, on the introduction of 
 these bills, particularly easy as to the result; but the 
 coldness mth which they were received, in the 
 Chamber of Deputies, and "without, exceeded our ex- 
 .pectation; ^nd this coldness extended itself to the 
 three penal enactments we proposed at the same time. 
 Our adversaries congratulated themselves on the 
 ground of attack we offered ; our friends appeared em- 
 barrassed by the position in which we placed them, 
 and saddened by the effowfc we demanded. We recog- 
 nized all the omens of a difficult and dangerous combat. 
 
 It was on the bill relating to prosecutions in case of 
 crimes committed conjunctively by soldiers and ci"vi- 
 lians that the struggle began in earnest. This bill had 
 nothing in it contrary to the essential principles of law, 
 either in a moral or an equitable sense ; it established 
 no exceptional tribunal, it removed no one from his 
 ordinary judges, while its political seasonableness was 
 evident. But it was in disaccord with the maxims 
 and traditions of French jurisprudence ; it presented 
 certain difficulties of execution, mostly specious, with
 
 218 MY ALLIANCE AND RUPTURE 
 
 a few that were real though not insurmountable. The 
 lawyers fastened on this discussion, and protracted it 
 for seven days. Out of thirty-one speakers who took 
 part in it, twenty were magistrates or advocates. They 
 were much divided amongst themselves; eleven at- 
 tacked the bill, and nine defended it. But the opposers 
 had with them the instincts and hal^its of the greater 
 portion of their auditors. They raised difficulties in 
 profusion which the defenders of the bill could not 
 so readily resolve. MM. Dupin and Nicod displayed 
 in this attack as much ardour as ability and address. 
 M. de Lamartine and M. de Salvandy supported the 
 bill A\dth resolute independence of spirit and the in- 
 spiration of eloquence, but without much effect. Some 
 of the principal political orators of th§ Chamber, , 
 M, Thiers and M. Odilon Barrot amongst others, took 
 no part in the debate. I intended to speak : I had 
 studied the question, taken notes, and pre2:)ared the 
 plan of my discourse ^, but, at the convenient mo- 
 ment, some of my steadiest friends urged me to remain 
 silent. I should excite, they said, more animated 
 passions; I should draw into the arena adversaries 
 who had hitherto held aloof, and should probably 
 augment the dangers of the question. I yielded to 
 this advice. It was an error. I know not whether 
 I could in any way have altered the result of the dis- 
 cussion, and I incline to think not; the opposition had 
 united its entire strength, and had also on its side, in 
 
 ' I insert amongst the Historic Documents No. XI. tliis i)lau 
 and these notes, which, altliough the question and position are 
 alike extinct, may still retain some interest.
 
 WITH M. MOLE. 219 
 
 this instance, all the weaknesses of the government 
 party. But for the position of the cabinet, and more 
 particularly for my own, it would have been better to 
 have taken my part in this great debate. Be that as 
 it may, its issue was against us ; the bill for the dis- 
 junction of tribunals was rejected by a majority of 
 two voices. 
 
 All the other bills we presented were stricken 
 by this check as a single gust of wind overthi'ows 
 the most varied and divided trees. The selection of 
 the Isle of Bourbon, and of the district of Salasie in 
 that island, as the locality for transportation, em- 
 braced difficulties and inconveniences. The bill on 
 the non-revelation of plots formed and crimes pro- 
 jected against the life or person of the King, gave 
 rise to strong moral objections and evil reminiscences. 
 M. Royer-Collard announced that he should oppose 
 it strenuously. On the dotation proposed for the 
 Duke of Nemours, all the controversies were re- 
 opened to which the assessment of the civil list had 
 given rise in 1831 and 1832. Why should the 
 princes have hereditary appanages ? why landed 
 property ? Would it not be better to give them pen- 
 sions on the state, or simply dotations for life? In 
 1837, as in 1831, all political and monarchical fore- 
 sio:ht was banished from these discussions. Re- 
 searches were made into the revenues of the private 
 estate, and the value of the portions of forest land 
 which the bill added to the domain of Rambouillet ; 
 and the opposition press raised doubts and suspicions 
 on this subject which could not be immediately re-
 
 220 MY ALLIANCE AND RUPTURE 
 
 futccl, and which, while waiting the refutation, chilled 
 and embarrassed the most friendly minds. Political 
 bodies have their impressions of alarm and panics 
 like armies. The cabinet was looked upon, in the 
 Chambers and by the public, as in a state of defeat, 
 and consequently approaching a crisis. 
 
 Its composition and internal state rendered it little 
 suited to an energetic and long defence. M. Mole 
 could live better A\^th superiors than with equals. 
 He had well served the Emperor Napoleon, and 
 submitted with a good grace to the presidency of the 
 Duke of Richelieu; but when the hierarchy of rela- 
 tive positions was not so clearly determined, when 
 men found themselves by the side of each other, with 
 their advantages and objections, their personal merits 
 and defects, and in a condition to be either associates 
 or rivals, M. Mole became mistrustful, suspicious, 
 susceptible, jealous, and alternately given over to un- 
 certainty and to ill-founded and misplaced preten- 
 sions. On the part of his colleagues, every unex- 
 pected step, the slightest negligence, appeared then 
 to him an act of secret malevolence and premeditated 
 hostility. The most trivial offence to his self-love 
 operated as a rankling Avound. His political educa- 
 tion had not been in the bosom of free institutions ; 
 he had formed and developed himself under a system 
 ignorant of the conditions and struggles of represen- 
 tative government; thus he was better adapted to 
 hold an insulated and entirely personal line of conduct 
 tlian to enter into the combinations and movements 
 of a great assembly. He was of excellent judgment
 
 WITH M. MOLE. 221 
 
 ill a council, skilful in management and agreeable in 
 manner in his intercourse with individuals, but party 
 en2:ao:ements and ties were unsuited to him. He 
 found them embarrassing in general policy, com- 
 promising rather than profitable to himself, and he 
 felt justified in disregarding them according to the 
 exigencies of public afikirs or of his own position. 
 No serious misunderstanding or visible quarrel oc- 
 curred between him and me during our short alliance ; 
 on the main point of the leading questions we were 
 habitually agreed, but the difference of our characters 
 and political habits soon manifested itself and rendered 
 our relations less cordial in reality than in appear- 
 ance. We acted together with mutual watchfulness, 
 and without a reciprocal feeling of perfect confidence. 
 M. Mole, moreover, persuaded himself, and quite 
 erroneously, that M. de Gasparin, more my friend 
 than his, sought to injure him to serve me ; and mis- 
 trust of all that emanated from the minister of the 
 Interior became one of his most uneasy preposses- 
 sions. Nothing was more foreign to the intentions 
 and conduct of M. de Gasparin, a man ever true and 
 loyal in public as in private life. He devoted himself 
 to the duties of his department with no other object 
 or care than that of discharging them faithfully. 
 Unfortunately, being more practised in administra- 
 tion than in policy, he wanted, in the Chambers and 
 in the Tribune, the ease and authority which the 
 many, important, and delicate affairs he had to handle 
 required. Modest even to timidity, though firm to 
 the extreme, in danger, he did not always combat
 
 222 MY ALLIANCE AND RUPTURE 
 
 with promptitude and success. When the hour of 
 reverse arrived, when the refusal of the bill for dis- 
 junction threw confusion into our ranks, these internal 
 weaknesses and discrepancies in the cabinet became 
 evident. In the Chambers and with the public, a 
 general impression went abroad that it would infallibly 
 fall unless it modified, according to its enemies, its 
 policy, and to its friends, its composition. 
 
 At first, partial changes only were spoken of, which 
 should leave intact the basis on which the ministry had 
 been formed, — the alliance between M. Mole and me. 
 The retirement alone of M. de Gasparin seemed to be 
 insisted on, and, with his accustomed disinterestedness, 
 he hastened to resign. I declared that if M. de Gas- 
 parin left the cabinet, I should only remain myself on 
 the condition of occupying the post of minister of the 
 Interior, and of being succeeded in that of Public 
 Instruction by one of my own friends, M. de Remusat, 
 in preference to any other. I had felt the insufficiency 
 of indirect influences, and was resolved to submit to 
 no combination in the government which did not 
 strengthen the policy I maintained, and my own posi- 
 tion in its support. M. Mole formally rejected this 
 modification. From that moment, my own position 
 became perfectly clear, and, to speak truly, I required 
 not this symptom to enlighten it. The question was 
 not simply personal or partial ; it involved an entire 
 change of politics. The check which the policy of 
 resistance had so recently met ^vith in the Chamber of 
 ])eputies had senously compromised it in the eyes of 
 the pul)lic and in the opinion of some of its defenders.
 
 WITH M. MOLE. 223 
 
 The majority which, until then, had firmly su2:)ported 
 it, appeared weary and wavering. Was it possible to 
 advance further, or even to persevere in the path in 
 which we encountered so many adversaries and such 
 doubtful allies ? Had the time arrived to loosen the 
 reins and try other modes of government ? As if on 
 the day succeeding a great and decisive victory, an 
 amnesty was again proposed; it was asked whether 
 such a proceeding would not finally disarm conspirators 
 and assassins. The King himself, Avithout being shaken 
 in his convictions, began to be moved and perplexed 
 in his resolves. It was under the pressure of this 
 general hesitation that the ministerial crisis developed 
 itself. I remained the representative of the policy of 
 resistance; M. Mole was preparing to become leader 
 of the policy of concession. Our rupture, and the 
 total dissolution of the cabinet, became, within a few 
 days, accomplished facts. Nothing then remained 
 but to ascertain under what maxims and standard 
 the new administration should be formed. 
 
 On the 5th of April, the King sent for me, told 
 me that M. Mole had tendered his resignation, and 
 required me to lay before him the elements of a cabinet. 
 I expected this trial : I had already spoken of it with 
 my friends, especially with the Duke de Broglie and 
 M. Duchatel, and I knew their dispositions. As far 
 back as the 29th of March, the Duke de Broglie, who 
 had absented himself with scrupulous reserve, wrote to 
 me as follows : " If, which God forbid, the King should 
 send for me spontaneously and entirely at liis own 
 suggestion, I could only, in my soul and conscience,
 
 224 MY ALLIANCE AND IIUPTURE 
 
 give him one advice, namely, to try a ministry founded 
 on a reconciliation between the men who for six years 
 have co-operated in defending the actual government ; 
 reserving for debate the conditions of the reconcilia- 
 tion and the various applications of the principle." 
 I instantly decided on my course. After first seeing 
 M. MoM, and receiving from hun a confirmation of 
 his retirement, I sought M. Thiers, who did not ex- 
 pect me, and proposed to him to reconstruct the cabi- 
 net of the 11th of October 1832. In that case lie 
 would have resumed the ministry of the Interior ; the 
 Duke de Broglie, Foreign Aff'airs Avith the Presidency 
 of the Council; M. Duchatel, the Finances; and I 
 should have continued in the ministry of Public In- 
 struction. Our conversation was long, unreserved, 
 ^Ndthout embittering allusions or subterfuges. M. 
 Thiers declined my proposal. He felt that what had 
 passed within a year, the question of Spanish interven- 
 tion, ever in controversy between the King and him- 
 self, and his position in the Chamber of Deputies, 
 prevented him from accepting it. I retui-ned to the 
 Tuileries; I related to the King my fruitless \dsit, 
 and prayed him to think of other means and other 
 persons than myself to form a cabinet. 
 
 During eight days the King sent for, sometimes 
 singly, at other times together. Marshal Soult, M. 
 Thiers, General Sebastiani, and M. Dupin. He dis- 
 cussed with them llie various pending questions and 
 every possible form of combination, pressing them to 
 lay some one before him that could meet the exigencies 
 of the position. They tried several, but witliout success ;
 
 WITH M. MOLE. 225 
 
 they were unable to agree either as to the persons or 
 measures. M. Mole had no share in these efforts, 
 complaining merely of the prolongation of the crisis, 
 and betraying symptoms that, at need, he could ter- 
 minate it. On the 12th of April, a report was spread 
 that, in concert with M. de Montalivet, he had applied 
 himself to the work. On the same day the King sent 
 for me again, and demanded if, with my o^vn parti- 
 cular friends, I could form a cabinet. Without exte- 
 nuating in the slightest degree either the peril or 
 difficulty of the enterprise, I asked him, in my turn, 
 if I might rely on two men of courage as colleagues, 
 who enjoyed his confidence, — M. de Montalivet and 
 the Duke of Montebello. In addition to M. Duchatel, 
 I selected amongst my friends M. de Remusat and 
 M. Dumon. I mentioned the name of General Bu- 
 geaud. "It is too dangerous," observed the King, 
 "svith a feeling of kind hesitation ; "I cannot, I dare 
 not." " I understand, sire," I replied; "the King- 
 mil find less compromising means," and, so saying, 
 I retired. Two days later M. Mole's cabinet was 
 formed, and the "Moniteur" of the 15th of April 
 announced that, under his presidency, M. Barthe, 
 M. de Montalivet, M. Lacave-Laplagne, and M. de 
 Salvandy had replaced, in the departments of Justice, 
 the Interior, Finance, and Public Instruction, M. Per- 
 sil, M. de Gasparin, M. Duchatel, and myself. 
 
 I was not mistaken as to the sense and bearing of 
 this change. The measures which M. Mole and I had 
 adopted and presented in concert were immediately 
 renounced. The bill for the dotation to the Duke of 
 
 VOL. IV. Q
 
 226 MY ALLIANCE AND IIUPTURE WITH M. MOLE. 
 
 Nemours was Avitlidrawn. Those on transportation 
 and the non-revealment of conspiracies fell to the 
 ground. A general amnesty was publicly announced. 
 In place of the policy of resistance, a new course 
 w^as proclaimed, which received the name, not of con- 
 cession, but of conciliation.
 
 227 
 
 CHAPTER IV. 
 
 THE COALITION. 
 
 MY DISPOSITION ON LEAVING OFFICE. FAMILY AFFLICTIONS. THE 
 
 DUCHESS OF ORLEANS ; HER ARRIVAL AT FONTAINEBLEAU ; HER 
 
 MARRIAGE ; HER ENTRY INTO PARIS. CHARACTER OF THE PALACE 
 
 OF FONTAINEBLEAU. ACCIDENTS AT THE CHAMP DE MARS. 
 
 OPENING OF THE MUSEUM OF VERSAILLES. MY CONVERSATIONS 
 
 AVITH THE DUCHESS OF ORLEANS. THE PRINCESS MARIE ; HER 
 
 MARRIAGE ; HER PURSUITS ; HER DEATH. WHAT IS DUE TO THE 
 
 MEMORY OF THE DEAD. LADY HOLLAND AND HOLLAND HOUSE. 
 
 GREAT NUMBER OF EMINENT MEN WHO DIED BETWEEN 1836 AND 
 
 1839. THEIR CHARACTERS. M. RAYNOUARD AND M. FLAUGERGUES. 
 
 M. DE MARBOIS AND THE ABBE DE PRADT. BARON LOUIS. 
 
 MARSHAL LOBAU AND GENERAL HAXO. M. SILVESTRE DE SACY. 
 
 M. LAROMIGUIERE. DR. BROUSSAIS. PRINCE TALLEYRAND. HIS 
 
 LAST VISIT TO THE INSTITUTE. HIS LATEST ACTS. COUNT DE 
 
 MONTLOSIER. DIFFICULTIES OF M. MOLi;'s POSITION. HOW HE SUR- 
 MOUNTED OR POSTPONED THEM. HIS INTERNAL MEASURES. — 
 
 FAVOURABLE EXTERNAL INCIDENTS. WAR WITH MEXICO. WITH 
 
 BUENOS AYRES. TREATY WITH HAYTI. — SECOND EXPEDITION TO CON- 
 ST ANTINE ; ITS SUCCESS. RETURN OF PRINCE LOUIS BONAPARTE TO 
 
 SWITZERLAND. FINAL ADOPTION OF THE TREATY OF THE TWENTY- 
 FOUR ARTICLES ON THE LIMITS OF BELGIUM. EVACUATION OF 
 
 ANCONA. MY ATTITUDE IN THE CHAMBER OF DEPUTIES. MY 
 
 SPEECHES IN MAY 1837, IN THE DEBATE ON SECRET SUPPLIES. 
 
 DISPLEASURE OF M. MOLE. DISSOLUTION OF THE CHAMBER OF 
 
 DEPUTIES. CHARACTER OF THAT MEASURE AND OF THE ELECTIONS. 
 
 SESSION OP 1837-1838. SUCCESSES AND FAILURES OF THE 
 
 CABINET. ITS POSITION AFTER THE SESSION. SESSION OF 1838-1839. 
 
 THE COALITION. ITS GENERAL CAUSES. MY PERSONAL MOTIVES. 
 
 WAS IT A MISTAKE ? DEBATE AND VOTE ON THE ADDRESS. 
 
 GOOD ATTITUDE OF M. MOLE. — DISSOLUTION OF THE CHAMBER OF 
 
 DEPUTIES. RESULT OF THE ELECTIONS. RETIREMENT OF THE MOLE 
 
 Q 2
 
 228 THE COALITION. 
 
 CABINET. VAIN ATTEMPTS TO lOUM A COALITION JtlNISTRY. 
 
 PROVISIONAL CABINET. RIOT OF THE 12T1I OF MAY 1839. — FORMA- 
 TION OF THE CABINET OF THE 12TH OF MAY 1839. 
 
 (1837—1839.) 
 
 Having left the ministry on the 15th of April 1837, 
 I passed nearly three years without returning to 
 public emplopiient. This was my longest vacation 
 between 1830 and 1848. Much has been said of my 
 ambition and the ardour of my struggles to maintain 
 or resume ofS.ce. I have been represented as a man 
 possessed by a single passion and obstinate in the 
 pursuit of a single object. These inferior moralists 
 know little of human nature, of the infinite variety 
 of its inclinations, and of the vicissitudes of the soul 
 in connection with the incidents of life. Ambition 
 has its days; so also has indifference. Great contests 
 animate and please, the resources of mind and cha- 
 racter are thereby developed; but there is no power 
 that does not become weary and call for repose. 
 Neither does destiny reside exclusively in the arena 
 of politics, and he who escapes from it will, perhaps, 
 encounter under his domestic roof, more piercing 
 wounds than the blows of his fiercest adversaries. 
 Such was my position in April 1837. Two months 
 before, on the 15th of February, I lost my eldest 
 son, an excellent and engaging youth who had 
 already reached manhood. He was almost twenty- 
 two, and promised me a companion equally amiable 
 and sure. It was not that he evinced much inclina- 
 tion for the career of politics. Endowed with dis-
 
 THE COALITION. 229 
 
 tinguislied intellect, lie had completed his literary 
 and scientific classes with unusual success; follow- 
 ing the lectures of the Normal School, and being 
 admitted after a strict examination into the Poly- 
 technic, although without the intention of becom- 
 ing a student there. His disposition was modest, 
 independent, and refined; somewhat concentrated 
 within himself, more anxious for confidential in- 
 timacy than for celebrity, and inclined to enjoy the 
 exalted pleasures of life rather than to court its 
 triumphs. I know not whether he would have taken 
 an important part in the public afi'airs of his country, 
 but he would assuredly have proved one of those 
 chosen spirits who embellish domestic life and re- 
 flect honour on human nature. A pleurisy snatched 
 him from me, and left the bitter conviction that the 
 malady had existed long before it was observed. 
 This is one of the saddest and most enduring im- 
 pressions left by the trials which have stricken me 
 in my dearest aifections. We seldom apprehend evil 
 sufiiciently or in time. 
 
 I never felt more disposed to bend under the 
 weight of affliction. Within a month after this 
 shock, the great debates in the Chambers commenced. 
 Besides the general policy, I had to support, on my 
 own account, the long discussion on the bill pre- 
 sented by me a year before, on the subject of se- 
 condary instruction. Then followed the ministerial 
 crisis. I was aided in my heavy task by the univer- 
 sal sympathy evinced towards me at this severe 
 moment ; a sympathy the more consoling as I recog- 
 
 Q 3
 
 230 THE COALITION. 
 
 nized in it, beyond personal consideration for myself, 
 a general sentiment of the dawning merits of my son, 
 and of the tender justice which men voluntarily accord 
 to a young life, suddenly extinguished in the midst 
 of brilliant hopes, without having yet engaged in 
 combat or experienced disapj^ointment. M. Dupin, 
 at that time President of the Chamber of Deputies, 
 overwhelmed me, amongst others, with friendly at- 
 tention. This man, sometimes so harsh, and so con- 
 stantly occupied with himself, has a heart open to 
 natural feelings, to family afflictions, and knows how 
 to treat them with respect, even beyond his own 
 domestic circle, and without any tie of personal 
 attachment. In the midst of these tokens of a sym- 
 pathy which I have some right to call public, it 
 happened nevertheless one day that in the Chamber 
 of Deputies an adversary of mine, more from routine, 
 as I believe, than through premeditated intention, 
 spoke of my determined attempts to retain power. 
 I could not listen silently to this unseasonable attack. 
 " Several times already in the course of my life," I 
 said, " I have accepted and resigned office, and, on 
 my own personal account, I am profoundly indif- 
 ferent to these variations of political fortune. I 
 associate with them no interest beyond that of the 
 public, and of the cause to which I belong, and 
 which I honour myself by supporting. You may 
 believe me, gentlemen, when I tell you, it has pleased 
 God to make me well acquainted with the joys and 
 sorroAvs which leave the soul inaccessible and cold to 
 all other pleasures and evils." This was indeed the
 
 THE COALITION. 231 
 
 sentiment I carried back to my unpretending home, 
 when I re-entered it with my aged mother and my 
 three young children. 
 
 It was not public business, but political festivals 
 which brought the first occasions for my again leav- 
 ing it. Two days after the completion of his mi- 
 nistry, M. Mole announced to the Chambers the 
 marriage of the Duke of Orleans with the Princess 
 Helena of Mecklenbourg-Schwerin. The Duke de 
 Broglie had left Paris as minister extraordinary to 
 make official demand of the princess's hand, and to 
 conduct her to France. I was invited to Fontainebleau, 
 where the nuptials were to be celebrated. I arrived 
 there on the 29th of May. The court was brilliant, 
 and the public satisfied. The future, they said, was 
 secure. It was well known that other alliances had 
 been attempted without success ; a good feeling was 
 entertained towards the young princess for her con- 
 fidence in the destiny, perhaps a stormy one, which 
 opened before her. It was related that before leav- 
 ing Schwerin, she replied to the expressed uneasiness 
 of her family, " I had rather be Duchess of Orleans 
 for a single year, than pass my life in looking from 
 these windows to see who enters the court of the 
 castle." High opinions were expressed of her mind, 
 her ideas, and her tastes. Amongst the French 
 liberals, her being a Protestant was far from unac- 
 ceptable; this was recognized as a consecration and 
 pledge of religious liberty. When she presented 
 herself, the first impressions confirmed anticipated 
 hopes. On the 29th of May, at five in the afternoon, 
 
 Q 4
 
 232 THE CO^SXITION. 
 
 all the invited guests assembled in tlie gallery of 
 Franeis I., wliich opens on the vestibule of the grand 
 staircase of the court of the White Horse, through 
 which the princess was to enter. At half-past six, 
 the King, the Queen, the princes and princesses, also 
 arrived to receive her. Her approach was announced. 
 At seven o'clock, under a flourish of drums and 
 trumpets, accompanied by the acclamations of the 
 crowd and the soldiers, she arrived, and found the 
 Duke of Orleans with the Duke of Nemours, at the foot 
 of the staircase, and the King himself at the top. On 
 approaching him, and in this first meeting with the 
 royal family, the expression of her features, her 
 manners, and her words, were perfectly noble and 
 simple, affectionately dignified, modest, and unem- 
 barrassed, as of one already at ease in her new 
 position, and naturally born for distinction and hap- 
 piness. On the following day, the 30th of May, a little 
 before nine in the evening, the solemn celebration of 
 the marriage commenced. There were three succes- 
 sive ceremonies ; the civil contract, in the gallery of 
 Henry II., performed by M. Pasquier, who two days 
 before had received from the King the title of chan- 
 cellor. He was the hundred and forty-sixth chan- 
 cellor of France, since Saint Boniface, who was 
 invested with that dignity in 752, on the accession of 
 Pepin the Short. After the civil marriage, the 
 Catholic form was celebrated in the chapel of Henri 
 Quatre, by the Bishop of Meaux, the Abbe Gallard; 
 and the Lutheran in the hall named after Louis- 
 Philippe, by M. Cuvier, President of the Consistory
 
 THE COALITION. 23 
 
 9t 
 
 of the Confession of Augsbourg at Paris. In the 
 midst of these ceremonies and amongst spectators so 
 mingled, the impression was as varied as the situa- 
 tions and creeds. Some congratulated themselves, 
 others evinced regret ; and a portion took part in the 
 complicated scene with indifferent curiosity and a 
 slight degree of surprise, more struck, as I believe, by 
 its novelty than by its imposing grandeur. But the 
 success of the event, and the person who occupied in 
 it the leading place, effaced or restrained these dif- 
 ferences of opinion ; and during the four days passed 
 by the court at Fontainebleau in promenades in the 
 park, in spectacles and fetes of every kind, the pre- 
 vailing sentiment was that of sympathy and satis- 
 faction. 
 
 I know no palace to be compared to Fontainebleau 
 for such solemnities. It stamps on them from the   
 first moment a lofty character.' So many kings and 
 so many ages have left their impress on the walls, 
 that when history is now acted there, it is in presence 
 of past records, and new events link themselves with 
 old ones, as with their own ancestors. From the 
 narrow winding staircase, which in a corner of the 
 oldest buildings leads to the small chamber of Louis 
 the Young, to the grand apartments constructed or 
 restored in recent days, we traverse the abodes of 
 Francis L, Henry II., Henry IV., Louis XIIL, 
 Louis XIV., Louis XV., Napoleon, Louis XVIIL, 
 and Louis-Philippe. We assist in their labours, we 
 contemplate their magnificence. Within two centuries 
 alone, and without speaking of other great trans-
 
 234 THE COALITION. 
 
 actions, five royal marriages or their accompanying 
 fetes have taken place within that residence. It was 
 at Fontainebleau that the natural son of Henry TV. 
 and Gabrielle d'Estrees, Caesar, Duke of Vendome, 
 espoused Gabrielle of Lorraine. Louis XIV., after 
 his marriage at Saint-Jean-de-Luz with the Infanta 
 Maria Teresa, conducted the young queen to Fon- 
 tainebleau, and passed nine months in the palace, in 
 the midst of the most brilliant festivals. Tlie King 
 of Spain, Charles II., who bequeathed his dominions 
 to Philip v., was united at Fontainebleau to Maria 
 Louisa of Orleans, niece of Louis XIV. The 
 marriage of Louis XV. with Maria Leczlnsky was 
 celebrated there. At a later period, that of Prince 
 Jerome Bonaparte with the daughter of the King of 
 AYurtemberg; and more recently, it was there that 
 Louis XVIII. received the Duchess of Berry. You 
 cannot move a step without encountering the most 
 striking reminiscences. While we were attending 
 the marriage of the Duke of Orleans, the Duchess de 
 Broglie occupied the apartments of Madame de 
 Maintenon. One mornino- when I was dressins; in a 
 cabinet which had formerly been a portion of the 
 Gallery of Stags, I perceived, at the bottom of the 
 wall, a marble plate on which I read : " In this win- 
 dow Queen Christina of Sweden, in 1657, ordered 
 the death of her equerry, Monaldeschi." Everywhere 
 throughout this palace, the walls speak, the dead 
 appear, and seem to re-assemble to greet the living 
 who arrive in their turn. 
 
 Towards four o'clock on the 4:tli of June I beheld
 
 THE COALITION. 235 
 
 that royal family, which I had seen at Fontainebleau 
 in all the pomp of a court, re-enter Paris, surrounded 
 by an entire nation. The King and the princes were 
 on horseback; the Queen, the Duchess of Orleans, 
 and the princesses, in an open carriage. From the 
 Arch of the Star to the Pavilion of the Clock, the 
 national guard and the regular troops lined the road. 
 An immense crowd, ' curious and joyful, filled the 
 Elysian Fields and the garden of the Tuileries. The 
 cortege advanced slowly along those vast alleys of 
 chestnuts and lilacs in flower. The sky was clear, 
 the sun brilliant, and the air balmy. The young 
 princess raised herself from time to time in her car- 
 riage to obtain a more perfect view of the grandeur 
 and effect of the spectacle, with which she was de- 
 lighted. Never, perhaps, did so tragical a destiny 
 open with such a flattering dawn. 
 
 I cannot say that even from that period sorrows 
 were not speedily mixed with joys, and hostile ma- 
 noeuvres with acclamations of attachment. Dur- 
 ing one of the popular fetes, at the egress from 
 the Champ de Mars, the obstruction of the crowd 
 and the narrowness of the passage led to deplorable 
 accidents. In the world and in the press many 
 hostile voices dwelt on these with secret complaisance, 
 comparing them to the misfortunes which, sixty- 
 seven years before, in the square of Louis XY., 
 had accompanied the nuptials of Louis XVI. with 
 Marie Antoinette; — a melancholy presage of a cruel 
 future. 
 
 The very effect of the festivals, the splendours of
 
 236 THE COALITION. 
 
 the court, the magnificence of royalty, the presents 
 offered to the Duchess of Orleans, her trousseau^ her 
 toilet-table, the descriptions which such subjects 
 furnish to flattery and curiosity, served as a text to 
 democratic enemies for remarks and commentaries 
 addressed to envious and hateful passions. Nothing 
 is so easy as to place in painful contrast good and 
 evil fortune, riches and want, — all that unequal dis- 
 tribution of property and poverty, of enjoyment and 
 suffering, which varies according to times, institu- 
 tions, and manners, but which still continues, in 
 different degrees, the permanent condition of hu- 
 manity. In presence of this formidable fact, Chris- 
 tian faith has its dogmas and promises ; philosophy, its 
 explanations and precepts ; policy, its duties and effec- 
 tual means, — if not of making it disappear altogether, 
 at least of restraint and palliation. But these are 
 little heeded by anarchical factions, who are mucli 
 more intent on turning the wound to advantage than 
 desirous of curing it ; and the very amusements of 
 the people furnish them with an opportunity for 
 irritation. These efforts were not spared at the 
 marriage of the Duke of Orleans, but they obtained 
 little success at the moment. The instincts of the 
 people are simple and upright ; they take their por- 
 tion of enjoyment in great events, without seeking in 
 them subjects of complaint or anger. The satisfac- 
 tion and good feeling of the public, in the days to 
 which I here refer, were animated and sincere; but 
 factions at war with a government have no occasion 
 for prompt success ; they feed themselves on their
 
 THE COALITION. 237 
 
 passion, their labour, and their hopes; and if the 
 moral and political forces, whose mission it is to 
 combat them, are not incessantly vigilant and active, 
 the venom penetrates and diiFuses itself, and sooner 
 or later the social body becomes infected. A woman 
 of spirit said of ghosts, " I do not believe in, but I fear 
 them." We are bound to believe in the demons of 
 anarchy, and to watch them with the wise apprehen- 
 sion which speaks of intelligence and foresight, but 
 has no taste of fear. 
 
 The fete which followed that of the marriage was 
 neither a courtly nor a popular festival. I do not 
 remember any exhibition more imposing than that of 
 the inauo;uration of the museum of Versailles, nor 
 any assembly which brought more vividly into con- 
 tact and contrast the France of the seventeenth and 
 the France of the nineteenth century; those two con- 
 ditions of society, the one truly and naturally the 
 daughter of the other, and at the same time so totally 
 distinct, and separated by the profound abyss of the 
 Revolution. Even in the mind of King Louis- 
 Philippe himself, the first idea of this museum was 
 only an expedient to save from barbarous destruction 
 and vulgar appropriation a palace and gardens, the 
 magnificent work and residence of the most powerful 
 and brilliant of his ancestors. This idea, grand and 
 beautiful in itself, expanded, rose, and carried with it 
 the attachment, I should say rather, the passionate 
 enthusiasm of the King, and the approbation of the 
 public. The entire history and glory of France, 
 as is said in the official inscription on the monument.
 
 238 THE COALITION. 
 
 — revived in canvas and marble, and replaced under 
 the eyes of present and future generations ; events 
 and persons, great deeds of war and civil life ; the 
 association of all French names, ages, and destinies 
 in these galleries of the dead called back to the con- 
 templation of the living ; — here is abundant matter to 
 engage reflecting thought and popular imagination. 
 The undertaking, when scarcely commenced by the 
 King, was hailed with delight, and he devoted him- 
 self to it with the pride of a descendant of Louis 
 XIV., the self-respect of an inventor, and the 
 assiduity of an architect. He took pleasure in dis- 
 cussing, directing, and closely watching the different 
 labourers as he traversed those extensive halls, the 
 greater part of which still empty, he saw in anticipa- 
 tion adorned and peopled according to his desire. 
 And on the ari'ival of the day when the work was 
 sufficiently advanced to be presented to the public, — 
 on that 10th of June 1837, when he summoned and 
 himself conducted a nation of guests through the 
 palace restored in honour of old France, and trans- 
 formed for the convenience of France of the present 
 time, — that day was undoubtedly one of the most 
 animated and agreeable of his busy and chequered 
 life. Was he personally much impressed by the 
 novelty of the spectacle of which he was the director ? 
 Did he on the instant fathom its great and original 
 character ? I suspect not. Very probably King 
 Louis-Philippe on that day was absorbed in the 
 pleasure and success of his enterprise. But I still 
 retain the idea which impressed me as I looked
 
 THE COALITION. 239 
 
 on that eager, anxious crowd which hurried in 
 some confusion from chamber to chamber in the 
 suite of the King. It was new France — mixed, 
 democratic, citizen — France, invading the palace of 
 Louis XIY. : peers, deputies, warriors, magistrates, 
 public functionaries, scholars, authors, and artists. 
 A pacific but a sovereign invasion ; conquerors some- 
 what astonished in the midst of their victory, but 
 ill constituted to enjoy it, although determined 
 to keep what they had won. The representatives of 
 the ancient French society, the inheritors of its great 
 names and brilliant recollections were not absent; 
 they circulated familiarly through all the windings 
 of the old abode of royalty, but they exhibited more 
 of familiar ease than they preserved of importance. 
 A people who had achieved their o^vn greatness and 
 for their own profit, and were endeavouring to be 
 free, evidently ruled in the palace of the great King, 
 and replaced his court. ' 
 
 The dramatic fete which wound up the day had 
 also its contrasts. The old theatre, recently restored, 
 was resplendent in colour and light. The King in- 
 tended that the master-piece of Moliere, the Misan- 
 thrope^ should be represented there without alteration 
 or omission ; not aline was to be expunged. The fur- 
 niture of the scene was exactly that of the seventeenth 
 century ; the costumes, faithfully copied from the 
 same date, were distributed to the performers ; all the 
 adjuncts of representation on the stage and in front, 
 were excellent, and probably far superior to what 
 had ever been exhibited to the eyes of Louis XIY.
 
 240 THE COALITION. 
 
 under the superintendence of Moliere. But the 
 effect was common-place and cold, more in default of 
 truth than from deficiency of talent. The actors 
 had no feeling of the general manners of the seven- 
 teenth century, nor of the simply aristocratic cha- 
 racter of the personages, nor of their frank wit 
 and natural language in the midst of the refinements 
 and subtle frivolities of their every-day life. The 
 style was inconsistent with the dresses, and the 
 accent with the words. Mademoiselle Mars played 
 Celimcne as a coquette of Marivaux', not as a con- 
 temporary of Madame de Sable and Madame de 
 Montespan. The incongruity was more glaring at 
 Versailles and in the palace of Louis XIV., than at 
 Paris and in the theatre of the Rue de Richelieu. 
 
 From Fontainebleau and Versailles I ];)roceeded to 
 Compiegne, where, towards the beginning of Septem- 
 ber in the same year, 1837, the Duke of Orleans, 
 who commanded a camp of twenty thousand men, 
 invited me to pass several days. The castle of Com- 
 piegne, notwithstanding its extent and splendour, 
 has nothing to engross and satisfy the imagination. 
 The ancient origin and important historical remi- 
 niscences of the place have disappeared in the recent 
 and massive buildings of Louis XIV. We must 
 look for them in books, for we forget them in 
 courts, pavilions, apartments, and staircases where 
 they are not recalled. But this visit to Compiegne, 
 at that time, had for me an exclusive charm. It 
 was there that I began to know the Duchess of 
 Orleans, whom the Duke her husband took pleasure
 
 THE COALITION. 241 
 
 in introducing to tlie army and to his guests, and who 
 did the honours, of the castle with admirable grace. 
 Being often seated near her at table, we conversed 
 much on many topics, for she had reflected, and took 
 an interest in everything with the ardour and fascina- 
 tion of an exalted, rich, and cultivated mind ; ready, 
 perhaps too much so, to admit impressions which 
 conveyed noble enjoyment, and more generous in her 
 susceptibilities than fastidious in taste or judgment. 
 We did not always agree, and she listened graciously 
 to my objections ; a little astonished at times, and 
 scarcely allowing me to think that she was much 
 touched by my remarks. I left her charmed with 
 the superiority of her understanding and the eleva- 
 tion of her sentiments, and convinced that she pos- 
 sessed a truly royal soul, not always perhaps to be en- 
 lightened by the trials of life, but of which they would 
 never subdue the courage nor impair the dignity. 
 
 On the 17th of October 1837, four months after the 
 marriage of the Duke of Orleans, his second sister, 
 the Princess Marie, espoused, at the Trianon, Duke 
 Alexander of Wurtemberg, and Avithin less than 
 fifteen months afterwards she died at Pisa, far from 
 her family, leaving behind her works and a name 
 singularly celebrated for a princess whose life was 
 circumscribed to twenty-five years. She had received 
 from heaven those gifts of invention and sentiment 
 in the domain of the arts which astonish and move, 
 at a distance as in close observation and in all ranks, 
 the imagination of men. She and the Duke of Orleans 
 were undoubtedly the most brilliant and popular of 
 
 VOL. IV. R
 
 242 THE COALITION. 
 
 the royal family, and both were cut off in the flower of 
 their popularity and youth, before prospects of the most 
 flattering future. Although the strongly original bent 
 of the Princess Marie's genius and character appeared 
 pre-eminently in the region of art, it was not confined 
 to that sphere alone. The same ardent and expansive 
 nature developed itself in every object of her occupa- 
 tion, and her taste included all great conceptions. 
 One day, in the park at Neuilly, at the commencement 
 of the sunnner of 1838, we were discoursing of the 
 most agreeable employments of life. She indulged 
 herself by imagining the position of a lady of eminent 
 station, escaping from the yoke of her rank, from the 
 etiquette and monotony of the court, and, without 
 descending from her refined habits, surrounding 
 herself with a diversified, accomplished, and animated 
 circle. The portrait drawn by Bossuet of. the 
 Princess Palatine, Anne of Gonzaga, in a funeral 
 oration, and some of his beautiful expressions, re- 
 curred to my memory. I repeated tliem to the 
 Princess Marie : " The genius of the Princess Pala- 
 tine found itself equally adapted to business and 
 recreation. The court never beheld any one more 
 engaging; and, without speaking of the acutenessof her 
 mind or the infinite fertility of her resources, every- 
 thing yielded to the sweet charm of her conversation 
 ... to such an extent did she attract confidence, and 
 so natural was it for her to win over hearts ! She 
 declared to the leaders of parties the extent to which 
 she would pledge herself, and they believed her in- 
 capable of deceiving or of being deceived. Her par*
 
 THE COALITION. 243 
 
 ticular disposition was to conciliate opposing in- 
 terests, and, while raising herself above them, to hnd 
 the secret place, and, as it were, the tie by which 
 they might be bound together . . . immoveable in, 
 her friendships and incapable of failure in any human 
 duty." The Princess Marie was pleased by the image 
 of such a character and life. " Yes," she said to me, 
 " to belong to all, to see all, to take part in all, 
 without becoming the slave of anything; delightful 
 conversations, sometimes a participation in great 
 affairs, liberty, friends, and the house of my aunt 
 Adelaide in the street of Varennes, to receive them ; — 
 here would indeed be perfect happiness." She was 
 not permitted this enjoyment, but the sight of the 
 misfortunes and afflictions of her family was spared 
 to her. God distributes his severities and favours 
 without reference to the foresight of men. 
 
 I have always entertained, even before reaching 
 old ag-e, an endurino- affection for the dead. The 
 infinite and unforeseen variety of the blows of the 
 destroyer incessantly recurs to me in thought at the 
 aspect of the healthiest and happiest lives. Enduring 
 sorrows inspire me with a profound and sympathetic 
 respect for the souls who feel them. Readiness of 
 oblivion impresses me with regret for those who 
 have passed so rapidly from the hearts where they 
 thought they possessed such strong hold; and it 
 gratifies me to cherish reminiscences which I per- 
 ceive so easily effaced. During my residence in 
 London, in 1840, I went one evening to pay a visit 
 at Holland House. Lord Holland v/as dining out, 
 
 r2
 
 244 THE COALITION. 
 
 I do not recollect where. I found Lady Holland 
 alone in that long library where, above the books, 
 portraits are placed of the celebrated politicians, 
 philosophers, and writers who had been the friends 
 and habitual visitants of the family. I asked Lody 
 Holland if it often happened that she found herself 
 thus alone. "No," she replied, "very seldom; but 
 when it occurs I am not without resources;" and 
 pointing to the portraits, she observed, " I entreat 
 the friends you see there to descend from above; 
 I know the place that each preferred, the arm-chair 
 in which he was accustomed to sit: tliey come: I 
 find myself again with Fox, Romilly, Mackintosh, 
 Sheridan, and Horner; they speak to me, and I 
 am no longer by myself." And this haughty, im- 
 perious, and capricious woman, who, in the midst 
 of the triumphs she had won by her beauty and 
 talents, retained the reputation of coldness and 
 egotism, appeared, as she thus spoke, to be visibly 
 and sincerely affected. From this incident I have 
 preserved a favourable impression of her. Those 
 who forget not have loved sincerely, and the fidelity 
 of the memory is one of the surest pledges of the 
 value of the heart. 
 
 I do not wish to incur the reproach of forgetfulness 
 towards the men with whom I have lived, and who 
 nearly all received me, while yet young and unknown, 
 with signal indulgence. At the precise epoch of which 
 I am now treating, within the short space of three 
 years, from 1836 to 1839, I saw a great number of 
 them disappear in succession, my immediate predeces- 
 sors or contemporaries ; some were my friends, and all
 
 THE COALITION. 245 
 
 truly distinguished ; men who, in extremely unequal 
 degrees as under very opposite pretensions, obtained 
 sufllicient mark to preserve a little place in the world's 
 remembrance, and to give me a right of saying some- 
 thing of them as to my own. 
 
 The two first, by the date of their deaths in 1836, 
 M. Raynouard and M. Flaugergues, were the last 
 survivors of that committee of the Legislative Body 
 who, in 1813, attempted the first essay, I will not 
 say of resistance, but of sincere warning, to the Em- 
 peror Napoleon, who, after a long succession of 
 triumphs, had reached the most fatal reverses and 
 stood on the brink of ruin. M. Raynouard was a 
 native of Provence, honest and acute, quick in manner 
 and speech, but moderate in spirit, sincerely liberal, 
 and capable of firmness in a moment of crisis, while 
 at the same time anxious to avoid difiicult positions 
 and the necessity of exercising the courage which 
 would never have failed him. After the Hundred 
 Days he retired from political life, and gave himself 
 up entirely, not, as he had done at an earlier period, 
 to poetry and the drama, but to learned letters, — to 
 the history of the French language and literature, 
 especially in the provinces of the south, and to the 
 labours of the two academies to which he belonged 
 in the Institute. He enjoyed without disturbance, to 
 his latest day, independence and respect in his labours, 
 repose, and the intimacy of some select friends. M. 
 Flaugergues, born in Rouergue, was a man of simple 
 manners and harsh exterior, upright in heart, and 
 firm in temper, even to obstinacy ; without originality, 
 
 B 3
 
 240 THE COALITION. 
 
 but not destitute of pretension in his political ideas, 
 and a subtle though a heavy reasoner. Not having, 
 like M. Raynouard, the tastes of literary life for a 
 refuge, he continued to occupy modest public func- 
 tions up to the day when, under the ministry of M. de 
 Villele, his conscientious independence led to his dis- 
 missal. From that period he lived in retirement, as 
 did his colleague of the committee of the five, but 
 much more obscure and forgotten. Both were honour- 
 able types of upright men, faithful to their liberal 
 convictions, but discouraged rather than enlightened 
 by experience, and resolved, from wisdom and probity, 
 to repel the iniquitous and absurd consequences of the 
 revolutionary spirit, without having learnt to dis- 
 cover its vices clearly, and to oppose them resolutely. 
 Some months later, two persons died whose lives 
 had been more actively and constantly political, — 
 M. de Marbois, at the age of ninety -two, who reckoned 
 seventy-one years of public service ; and the Abbe de 
 Pradt, Archbishop of Malines, who for more than 
 twenty years had exchanged his episcopal seat, whence 
 the Catholics ejected him, for a pension of twelve 
 thousand francs, and lived on his estate at Breuil in 
 Auvergne, incessantly occupied in sending forth 
 pamphlets and newspaper articles, and in making 
 excursions to Paris. I have already mentioned what 
 were, in 1815 and 1816, my relations with M. de 
 Marbois. They continued, up to his death, frequent 
 and affectionate. I often met the Abbo de Pradt in 
 society, where he was the most inexhaustible and 
 wearisome of talkers, determined to consider his
 
 THE COALITION. 247 
 
 auditors as untiring as himself. A comparison of 
 the lives of these two men, and of the position each 
 made for himself, would form a curious study and 
 supply a highly moral conclusion. Both were mixed 
 up, from their youth and almost to their decease, 
 with the events and affairs of their time ; in public 
 duties, in assemblies, at the court, abroad, and in 
 exile. Both served and even adulated nearly all the 
 authorities which have succeeded each other with us, 
 and authorities of the most opposite character. Both 
 acted, wrote, and spoke much; but in these vicissi- 
 tudes of their lives they were stamped, or rather they 
 stamped themselves, with extremely different seals. 
 The radical defect of repeated revolutions is to for- 
 get and kill respect. The Abbe de Pradt ran full tilt 
 into this vice of his age. M. de Marbois continued 
 always a stranger to it. Whatever might be his situa- 
 tion, M. de Marbois, honest and serious, sincerely 
 respected his ideas, his cause, his country, his party, 
 and himself. The Abbe de Pradt, vain and thought- 
 less, respected nothing, neither persons, ideas, cause, 
 party, nor master : he alternately praised and abused 
 all, extolled them to the clouds or turned them into 
 ridicule. Thus, the one lived and died honoured by 
 his superiors, his equals, even by his adversaries and 
 indifferent persons who disagreed with him ; the other 
 was universally treated without the least considera- 
 tion by those even whom he served or amused ; and 
 despite his rare intelligence, and without being abso- 
 lutely corrupt, he ended his life in equal disrepute 
 with the State and the Church, as a politician and as 
 
 R 4
 
 248 THE COALITION. 
 
 a priest. The world takes men at their word, and 
 holds them in no higher estimation than they appear 
 to hold themselves. 
 
 A statesman who had been thrice charged to 
 restore the finances of France, exhausted by war, or 
 utterly deranged by revolutions, and who as often 
 floated them again by credit, while founding credit 
 on order and probity, — Baron Louis, — died also in 
 the course of this same year, 1837. He was endowed 
 with an expanded, steady, and unsophisticated mind, 
 which proposed to itself but one end, never losing 
 sight of it, and resolutely exacting, from everyone 
 all its conditions. Independently of the signal ser- 
 vices he rendered in the direct exercise of power, 
 no one more essentially contributed to infuse and 
 establish solidly, in all branches of our financial ad- 
 ministration, those wholesome maxims, those strong 
 habits and traditions which until now have protected, 
 and will, I trust, ever protect it against ignorant 
 chimeras, thouglitless innovations, and the greedy 
 pretensions which disorder alone can satiate. 
 
 Another valiant defender of a diffisrent species of 
 order, still more urgent, if not more essential, — 
 Marshal Count de Lobau, — terminated at the same 
 epoch his life, so often hazarded and spared on 
 fields of battle. Under manners of little refinement, 
 he possessed a mind judicious and sensible to shrewd- 
 ness, with as much devotion to the duties of the 
 citizen as to those of tlie soldier. For seven years 
 he commanded the national guard of Paris with 
 tranquil resolution, and a blunt but intelligent and
 
 THE COALITION. 249 
 
 prudent authority in his brief mode of speech. A 
 few months before his death the army also lost one 
 of its eminent chiefs — the General of Engineers, 
 Haxo — recently celebrated at the siege of Antwerp; 
 an officer and a man of mark, of highly- cultivated 
 faculties beyond his special vocation, and of the most 
 honourable character. His rare capacity and the 
 just confidence he inspired would have fitted him for 
 a more exalted career, had he not been possessed by 
 a mania, which, sometimes vitiating his judgment, 
 rendered him always troublesome and occasionally 
 impracticable, — the mania of criticizing, objecting, 
 and contradicting, as if indispensably required to 
 prove the originality and independence of his thought. 
 One of his friends said, " Haxo never agrees with 
 anybody; thus no one ever agrees with him." 
 
 Death seems to have its days for seeking, in all 
 careers, select victims for immolation. While striking 
 so many distinguished men devoted to the service of the 
 State, it reached also, in their retirement and in the 
 midst of scientific labours, an academician, a metaphy- 
 sician, and a physician, all three eminent and famous ; 
 M. Silvestre de Sacy, M. Laromiguiere, and Doctor 
 Broussais. I have nothing to say here of their special 
 merits in their respective sciences, but I preserve a 
 clear remembrance of their characters and physio- 
 gnomy. M. Silvestre de Sacy joined the knowledge of 
 his own time to the manners of bygone ages. Active, 
 with calmness and gravity, he was found equal to nu- 
 merous and diversified functions without ceasing to 
 take his learned studies for the central object of life.
 
 250 THE COALITION. 
 
 When called to a situation which connected him with 
 politics, he performed its duties scrupulously, rather 
 than in the light of his appropriate and selected 
 mission ; and while engaged in worldly aiFairs, retained 
 his attachment to his austere home. His vast erudition, 
 far from unsettling, had confirmed his Christian faith, 
 and all the overthrows he had witnessed and partici- 
 pated in, had neither aiFected his domestic habits nor 
 the regularity of his piety. The revolution which as- 
 sailed and altered everything around him, seemed 
 never to have reached himself; and if it had not taken 
 place, I believe he would still have remained the same 
 moral individual. I never knew a man on whom 
 external circumstances and agencies obtained such 
 slender hold, and who, for the regulation of his life, 
 listened more exclusively to the voice of his o^\ti 
 judgment and conscience in solitary communion with 
 the soul. A rare and admirable example of moral 
 health, for it is even more difficult for minds than 
 bodies to escape contagion. 
 
 In opposition to M. de Sacy, M. Laromiguiere fol- 
 lowed the current of modern influences and ideas. 
 In intellectual order and with the refined discipline 
 of his spirit, he was a disciple of the eighteenth cen- 
 tury, and the steady friend of the most faithful 
 pliilosophic representatives of that great epoch — Con- 
 dorcet, Tracy, Cabaris, Yolney, and Garat. But 
 Avhile habitually partaking their opinions and society, 
 M. Laromiguiere held himself absolutely aloof from 
 politics, a stranger to all worldly ambition, to all 
 appearance of self-aggrandizement, solely addicted to
 
 THE COALITION. 251 
 
 the study and teaching of philosophy, and practising 
 its tenets with as much wisdom as he took delight in 
 imparting them to others. I know not whether, in 
 the history of metaphysics, there remains any impor- 
 tant trace of his labours, amongst others of his at- 
 tempt to enlarge and elevate the sensualistic doctrine 
 of liis master, Condillac, by leading him a step towards 
 spiritualism. His idea on this subject was ingenious 
 and well stated rather than original and profound. 
 But what will survive M. Laromiguiere in the me- 
 mories of the present age, will be the charm of his 
 person and instruction. His disposition was gentle 
 and accessible with dignity, his mind clear and 
 elegant ; always animated and never aggressive, he 
 delighted in conversation and argument, but disliked 
 contest and carefully avoided it, even within the range 
 of philosophy, while maintaining his opinions with 
 becoming firmness. He was sincere, without passion ; 
 defending himself well and never accepting defeat, but 
 little bent on pursuing victory; more solicitous for 
 his independence and repose than jealous of propa- 
 gating his doctrines, and leaving them without much 
 solicitude to their fate, provided they disturbed not 
 his own. 
 
 In this particular, no one less resembled M. La- 
 romiguiere than Doctor Broussais ; in proportion as 
 one loved tolerant and pacific science, the other pre- 
 ferred it warlike and predominating. I have formed 
 no opinion, and I have no right to adopt one, on the 
 physiological and medical theories of Doctor Broussais, 
 and no one is more opposed than I am to the general
 
 252 THE COALITION. 
 
 philosophical ideas he sought to deduce from them; 
 but it was impossible to know him without l^eing 
 struck, I will even say moved, by the energy of his 
 convictions, and his devotion to obtain their triumph. 
 He was one of those natures, intellectually powerful 
 and vehemently personal, in wdiom the love of truth 
 and self-esteem mingle and unite so closely that it is 
 difficult to discern the respective portions of either in 
 the transports and infatuations of passion. Doctor 
 Broussais experienced in his scientific life the fate of 
 more than one eminent politician. He won and lost 
 great conquests ; he saw his reputation increase and 
 decline, he enjoyed in the young learned world popular 
 favour, and experienced the bitterness of being aban- 
 doned. I am convinced that neither errors nor 
 reverses weakened his faith in his own ideas and his 
 hopes for their future. He was of those who even 
 in falling impart a step in advance to their fol- 
 lowers, and w^ho have more claims to respect in their 
 decline than to enthusiasm during their triumph. 
 
 Amongst the many deaths of these three years, I 
 have not yet named the most celebrated of all ; 
 of him who occupied the greatest share of public 
 attention during his life, and who attracted equal 
 notice at the moment of his decease, — Prince Talley- 
 rand. After his resignation of the English embassy, 
 lie lived alternately in Paris and at his seat of 
 Valen9ay; always well received by King Louis- 
 Pliilippe, but not invariably finding in this passive 
 favour the means of escaping from vacuum and 
 ennui. He had been from its origin a member of the
 
 THE COALITION. 253 
 
 class of moral and political sciences in the Institute, 
 and lie re-entered it of right in 1832, when I caused 
 its re-establishment. A fancy seized him in 1838 to 
 deliver a lecture there, and, in effect, on the 3rd 
 of March, at a private sitting, he read to us a notice 
 of Count Reinhard, a learned and honest diplomatist, 
 who had long served under his orders, either in the 
 bureaux or in various foreign posts, and who had 
 even been for a moment, in 1799, minister for Foreign 
 Affairs. The lecturer was greater than his subject. 
 He had too much taste to exaggerate it ; a just sen- 
 timent of proportion and accordance formed one of 
 the intellectual qualities of M. de Talleyrand, and his 
 empiricism, when he chose to practise it, was perfectly 
 delicate and concealed. While praising M. Reinhard, 
 he left him his true position and stature; but he 
 scattered through his notice, on the subject of study 
 and diplomacy, a multitude of reflections ingeniously 
 acute, and brilliant passages without appearing to 
 study novelty or effect. It was written with that 
 natural elegance, which in a modest topic and in a 
 short composition, supplies the place of talent, with- 
 out its pretension. This reading, at which several 
 members of other academies of the Institute were 
 present, including M. Royer Collard and M. Ville- 
 main, met with general success. Particular attention 
 was excited by an extremely just eulogium, but one 
 little expected, of high theological studies, of their in- 
 fluence on the vigour as well as on the refinement of 
 the mind, and of the able ecclesiastical politicians they 
 had formed, especially the Cardinal Chancellor Du-
 
 254 THE COALITION. 
 
 prat, the Cardinal d'Ossat, and the Cardmal de 
 Polignac. M. de Talleyrand evidently experienced 
 a bold satisfaction in recalling that he also had studied 
 in the Seminary, and in proving that if, since, he had 
 bestowed little thought on the duties of that position, 
 he, at least, had not forgotten the advantages he 
 derived from it. His listeners felt obliged to him for 
 having offered a work to the Institute, destined, 
 probably, to be his last, and the least devout readily 
 forgave the great philosophic dignitary, who treated 
 them with this act of deference, for his compliments 
 to the theologians. 
 
 Their good feeling towards him was speedily sub- 
 jected to a more difficult trial. A few weeks after 
 his lecture at the academy, M. de Talleyrand fell 
 seriously ill. Death approached him. How would 
 he receive it ? What would be his own final judg- 
 ment on his past life ? At the moment of appearing 
 before the Sovereign Judge, by what acts or denials, 
 by what words or silence would he manifest the 
 state of his soul ? On the mere report of his illness, 
 the heads and zealous believers of the Catholic Church 
 busied themselves vehemently with these questions. 
 Around his bed, affectionate solicitudes and pious 
 entreaties were not wanting. On the other hand, 
 amongst those of his contemporaries who had, like 
 himself, professed and practised the philosophic ideas 
 of the eighteenth century and the revolution, several 
 dreaded, on his part, a contradiction of his life, a 
 desertion of his cause, a symptom of weakness and 
 hypocrisy. To speak only of the external and known
 
 THE COALITION. 255 
 
 acts of liis last days, what M. de Talleyrand did, he 
 was consistent in doing, and his death merited no 
 reproach either of falsehood or vacillation. Inde- 
 pendently of all inward faith in his relations with 
 the church to which he belonged, he had been 
 deficient in imperative duties, and had committed 
 great scandals. In submitting to an acknowledg- 
 ment of these errors, and in avowing his penitence, 
 he performed an act honest in itself and in accord- 
 ance with the opinion of the world. It was neither 
 an abjuration of his general ideas, nor an abandon- 
 ment of his political cause, but a solemn apology 
 after notorious irregularities. He might have done 
 this without hypocrisy, for he was one of those 
 who, even in the licence of their lives, maintain, 
 through natural elevation of mind, the instinct of 
 moral order, and willingly render to that feeling 
 the respect which is its due, when no longer called 
 upon to sacrifice to it their interests or their passions. 
 I know not what may have been the religious 
 disposition of M. de Talleyrand at the last hour, 
 and under the solitary trembling of the soul on the 
 point of separation from this world. Death has 
 authoritative influences, equally unexpected and 
 secret, which no one here below can penetrate. But 
 a characteristic fact deserves to be recorded. When, 
 on his death-bed, a letter was handed to him for 
 signature which he had addressed to the Pope, he 
 desired that it might be dated on the day when he 
 read his notice of Count Rein hard to the Institute. 
 He was anxious to prove he had written that letter
 
 256 THE COALITION. 
 
 with unimpaired mental faculties, and to associate 
 his deed of submission to the Church with his last 
 act of fidelity to his friends and the recollections of 
 his life. 
 
 In the same year, 1838, some months after the 
 death of M. de Talleyrand, an aged man of eighty- 
 four, like himself, one of his colleagues and adver- 
 saries in the Constituent Assembly of 1789, the 
 Count of Montlosier, was called to the same tribunal. 
 He possessed one of the strongest and most original 
 minds I have ever met with; his character, his 
 understanding and ability, whether as orator or 
 author, even his person and manners, all were marked 
 by the double physiognomy of solitude and combat. 
 He seemed to have passed his life far from the world, 
 in his mountains of Auvergne, meditating on its 
 volcanoes or their congenial studies, and to have 
 descended amongst men for the single purpose of 
 dispute. Liberal and aristocratic, monarchical and 
 independent, his opinions on religion, pohtics, history, 
 and literature were all profoundly personal, — the fruit 
 of his solitary reflections and researches, — and he 
 maintained them as men defend their houses or 
 their lives. He was at once filled with pride, capable 
 of devotion, and passionately obstinate in disconnected 
 and incoherent ideas and sentiments. There were in 
 him the elements of superiority, but method and 
 harmony were utterly deficient, and he consumed in 
 imperfect labours, in generous but almost uniformly 
 futile efforts, in extreme contests, a rare energy of 
 mind and spirit, and a life of unusual duration.
 
 THE COALITION. 257 
 
 When he beheld its term at hand, he called faith and 
 the Christian Church to his aid in that formidable 
 transition. He had always respected and frequently 
 defended them. They had neither defection nor 
 scandal to reproach him with. He declared himself 
 ready to disavow, in a general sense, all that either 
 in his conduct or writings might have appeared 
 contrary to their dogmas or precepts. But he was 
 asked to retract expressly the ideas he had sometimes 
 maintained on the relation of the Church with the 
 State, on the part of the clergy in our Christian 
 societies, and on religious congregations. He hesi- 
 tated, sorrow-stricken and undecided. Explanations 
 and amendments were spoken of and proposed to 
 him, and while the question was still in argument, 
 he died in a medley of submission and resistance, 
 neither a deserter nor a rebel, but ever an inde- 
 pendent. 
 
 I have acquitted myself, if such a discharge is 
 possible, towards the dead of the age in which I 
 have lived, and who occupied such different and 
 unequal positions. It only remains for me here to 
 notify the date of the decease of a lady, whose 
 friendship during nearly twenty years afforded me 
 unqualified delight in days of happiness, and was 
 even more consolatory in those of sorrow. The 
 Duchess de Broglie died of a brain fever, on the 
 22nd of September, 1838. She was one of the most 
 noble, rare, and charming creatures I have ever seen, 
 and of whom I shall only say, in the words of Saint 
 Simon, when deploring the loss of the Duke of 
 
 VOL. IV. . s
 
 258 THE COALITION. 
 
 Burgundy : " May the mercy of God permit me to 
 behold her eternally, where, beyond all doubt, his 
 goodness has placed her!" I return to the living, 
 to their agitations and struggles. 
 
 In forming the cabinet of the 15th of April, M« 
 MoM undertook a difficult task. He abandoned the 
 policy of resistance, which, in general thesis, he 
 wished to maintain. He adopted the policy of the 
 third party without belonging to it, and without 
 ranging himself in the ranks of that section as one 
 of its own natural adherents. By his ideas, habits, 
 and tastes, he was a man of order and authority ; 
 the maxims and tendencies of the democratic oppo- 
 sition inspired him with much more disquietude than 
 sympathy, and yet it was to the desires of this very 
 democratic opposition that he yielded, and towards 
 which he inclined when he Avithdrew the repressive 
 and monarchical bills he had himself presented, and 
 proclaimed an amnesty in the midst of the combat, 
 not on the morrow of a victory, but of a defeat. A 
 single power which acts without discussion, can, on 
 a given day, and for several days, change thus 
 abruptly, attitude, direction, and language; but it 
 was in presence of great free assemblies, and when it 
 was impossible to escape from their debates, that M. 
 Mole accomplished this sudden manoeuvre. His new 
 policy might be good or bad, but his parliamentary 
 position was weak and false. He had to govern with 
 and by the Chambers, and in the Chambers he was 
 Avithout a friendly and tried party, without a steady 
 and defined standard, floating between two leading
 
 THE COALITION. 259 
 
 opinions of the house, and momentarily inclined 
 towards that from which he could promise himself no 
 certain support, and the least in accordance with his 
 own dispositions. 
 
 He diminished or adjourned with much sagacity 
 and tact the difficulties of this position. The gravity 
 of his appearance and demeanour relieved him from 
 all semblance of versatility or weakness. The charm 
 of his intercourse and conversation drew towards 
 him the men of no previously decided party, and 
 conciliated good -will even in the ranks where he 
 reckoned on no political adhesion. He knew how 
 to arrange and recommend measures calculated to 
 give to opposing opinions the required satisfaction 
 or suitable compensation. Four days after having 
 pardoned the abettors of revolutionary plots, he re- 
 opened and restored to public worshija the church of 
 Saint Germain I'Auxerrois, which had remained 
 closed since the riot of the 13th of February, 1831, 
 finally delivering the Catholics from that revolutionary 
 outrage; then followed the restoration of the cru- 
 cifix in the hall of the Royal Court at Paris. While 
 serving the house of Bourbon, he failed not to re- 
 member his debut in public life, and when occasion 
 offered, he rendered honourable and friendly offices 
 to the family or ancient adherents of the Emperor 
 Napoleon. He proposed and carried the vote for 
 a pension of 100,000 francs to the Countess of 
 Lipano, ex-Queen of Naples. While watchful over 
 religious and moral observances, he took equal care 
 of material interests, and presented many bills to the 
 
 s 2
 
 260 THE COALITION. 
 
 Chamber of Deputies for the establishment of rail- 
 roads to be completed by the co-operation of private 
 speculation with the state. Several important laws, 
 the greater part of which had been proposed by pre- 
 ceding cabinets, and amongst others, those on the 
 duties of municipal authorities and general depart- 
 mental councils, were definitively debated, adopted, 
 and promulgated in the course of his ministry. To 
 him belonged the honour of effectually shutting up 
 the gaming-houses of Paris, a measure voted during 
 the cabinet of the 11th of October, 1832, on the pro- 
 position of M. Humann. By the care of his col- 
 leagues, MM. Barthe, Montalivet, Salvandy, and 
 Lacave-Laplagne, the internal administration at this 
 epoch was both enlightened and active; and the 
 name of M. Mole, his imperious character, blended 
 with frigid politeness, his position near King Louis- 
 Philippe, Avith whom he was at the same time de- 
 ferential and exacting, respectful and susceptible, 
 imparted a unity to his cabinet, Avhich, although not 
 predominantly powerful, was far from being deficient 
 in dignity. 
 
 In the conduct of foreign affairs, he had this good 
 fortune, — that no profound disagreement, no compro- 
 mising question sprang up during his administration 
 between the great European powers. The English 
 cabinet was less confidential and colder with him 
 than it had been with M. Cashnir Perier and the 
 Duke de Broglie. The cabinets of Vienna, Berlin, 
 and Saint Pctcrsbourg, well pleased at a relaxation 
 of ties between the two great constitutional states,
 
 THE COALITION. 261 
 
 reciprocated friendly relations witli M. Mole, praising 
 his principles and regulations, but showing them- 
 selves more disposed to profit by than to meet them 
 with a substantial return. The attitude altogether 
 was more agreeable than secure; not strong enough 
 to surmount grave difficulties, should they present 
 themselves, but which offered no provocation, and 
 sufficed for the necessities of the moment. 
 
 Moreover, incidents occurred, in the secondary re- 
 gions of external policy, which marked the cabinet 
 of M. Mole with good fortune, which he readily seized 
 and turned to account. In America, amongst the 
 greater portion of the new states formed from the 
 ruins of the Spanish supremacy, violent and pre- 
 carious governments outraged at every moment the 
 principles of public right, invaded the interests of 
 the resident or foreign merchants, and rejected with 
 ignorant and improvident arrogance the remon- 
 strances of the European governments. In March 
 1838, facts of this nature led to a rupture with 
 Mexico; at first the suspension of diplomatic re- 
 lations, then the blockade of the Mexican ports, and 
 finally war. A French squadron, commanded by 
 Admiral Baudin, which the Prince de Joinville 
 hastened to join, commenced vigorous hostilities, 
 carried by assault the fortress of Saint Jean d' Ulloa, 
 said to be impregnable, subsequently Vera Cruz, and 
 compelled the Mexican government, despite its bra- 
 vadoes and revolutionary fluctuations to sign a treaty 
 of peace on the 9th of March, 1839, which satisfied 
 the demands of France. In Southern America, at 
 
 s 3
 
 262 THE COALITION. 
 
 the mouth of the La Plata, between Monte Video and 
 Buenos Ayres, analogous causes, complicated by the 
 internal discords of the two republics, produced the 
 explosion of similar events, and led to the commence- 
 ment, in June 1838, of that series of negotiations, 
 combats, and ineffectual attempts at peace, destined 
 for ten years to occupy French diplomacy, naval in- 
 terference, and parliamentary debates. The black 
 republic of Hayti failed to keep the engagements con- 
 tracted in 1825, under the ministry of M. de Villele, 
 in return for the acknowledgment of its indepen- 
 dence. M. Mole reminded it of these contracts; 
 first, by negotiation, secondly, by the presence of a 
 squadron ; and on the 12th of February, 1838, a 
 fresh treaty was concluded, which confirmed the inde- 
 pendence of the new state, fixed the indemnity to the 
 colonists at sixty millions, and stipulated for an 
 immediate instalment. These distant enterprises, 
 bravely executed and carried to a successful issue, 
 excited the interest of the public, and animated with- 
 out compromising the foreign policy of the cabinet. 
 
 A more important and durable success was sought 
 for and found in Algeria. It had been decided, 
 under the preceding ministry, before my rupture 
 with M. Mole, that a second expedition should be 
 undertaken against Constantine to revenge the check 
 we had received there. It took place between the 
 2nd of October and the 3rd of November, 1837, under 
 the command of General Damremont, who prej^ared 
 it with provident activity, conducted it under heavy 
 difficulties to the walls of the place ; and while visiting
 
 THE COALITION. 263 
 
 the works in the trenches with the Duke of Nemours, 
 was struck doAvn by a cannon shot, which, without 
 allowing him to feel death, gloriously terminated his 
 honourable life. This mournful accident, far from 
 abating, redoubled the ardour of the attack; the 
 senior officer present, the general of artillery Yalee, 
 already possessing the confidence and esteem of the 
 army, to which he had added new titles since the 
 commencement of the expedition, at once assumed 
 the command ; and on the day following the death 
 of General Damremont, the 13th of October, the as- 
 sault was given with a vigour worthy of the best era 
 of our best soldiers. The Duke of Nemours com- 
 manded, with intrepid coolness, the column of attack ; 
 several of our bravest officers, amongst others 
 Colonels Combes and Lamoriciere, found there, the 
 first his death, the second a dangerous wound. But 
 the place was carried; its fall determined the sub- 
 mission of the surrounding tribes, and the expedition 
 resulted in a conquest which definitively added the 
 province of Constantine to the number of French 
 possessions in Africa. 
 
 Four months previously, General Bugeaud, de- 
 spatched into the province of Oran to arrest the pro- 
 gress of Abd-el-Kader, had concluded with that able 
 leader a treaty known by the name of the treaty 
 of the Tafna: a precarious peace, since severely 
 criticised, and which supplied important objections 
 to minds preoccupied with our future prospects in 
 Algeria, but which, at the moment of its conclusion, 
 was opportune and advantageous. Spectators are 
 
 s 4
 
 264 THE COALITION. 
 
 prone to judge political transactions by their own 
 fixed and general views, not according to the exist- 
 ing circumstances and special objects which have 
 determined the actors. A fertile source of error and 
 injustice. By the taking of Constantine, the tem- 
 porary pacification of the province of Oran, and the 
 administration, little popular, but able and honest, 
 of ^Marshal Yalee, who succeeded General Damremont 
 as governor-general, the ministry of i\I. Mole was, for 
 Algeria, a period of prudent extension and effectual 
 consolidation 
 
 Three great questions, the return of Prince Louis 
 Bonaparte from America to Switzerland, on the 
 death of his mother Queen Hortense, — the execution 
 of the treaty denominated, of the twenty-four articles 
 which definitively settled the territorial limits of 
 Belgium, — and the evacuation of Ancona by the 
 French troops, were, externally, the leading affairs 
 of the ministry of M. Mole, and were settled in a 
 manner which excited the most vehement attacks. 
 The events, passions, and contests of that time are 
 already so far removed from us, and the repose of 
 my present life throws so much light on my percep- 
 tions of the past, that I may say, without embarrass- 
 ment or reserve, what I think to-day of the policy 
 of M. Mole on those three points, and of the objections 
 to which it gave rise. 
 
 In demanding from Switzerland the removal of 
 Prince Louis Bonaparte, M. Mole was fully justified. 
 It was tiie only method, if not of stifling, at least 
 of rendering more diflioult and perilous, the designs
 
 THE COALITION. 265 
 
 publicly avowed and pursued by the prince against 
 the government of France. Public right authorized 
 this requisition, and the simplest political foresight 
 commanded it. Perhaps M. Mole did not adopt the 
 most eligible diplomatic proceedings; perhaps, in 
 form, he may have neglected the circumspection best 
 calculated to attain his object. His ability was 
 sometimes rather superficial ; but, after all, his step 
 was as legitimate as necessary, and it succeeded 
 without the employment of other means than a few 
 momentary demonstrations, and without more incon- 
 venience than the clamour of the violent democrats 
 in Switzerland, and the ill humour, more apparent 
 than real, of the federal government of the Republic, 
 sufficiently moderate to practise, but too timid or too 
 weak to avow openly the principles of public right 
 and sound sense. 
 
 I must say the same of the attitude of M. Mole 
 in relation to the treaty of the twenty-four articles 
 on the territorial limits of Belgium. In 1834 the 
 Belgians were eager to accept this treaty as the 
 pledge of their independence acknowledged by Eu- 
 rope. In the subsequent negotiations to which the 
 prolonged refusal of the King of Holland gave rise, 
 the French government had vainly endeavoured to 
 obtain for Belgium the entire possession of the 
 duchies of Luxembourg and Limbourg. On the 11th 
 of December, 1838, the conference of London main- 
 tained the treaty of the twenty-four articles which 
 the King of Holland at last appeared disposed to 
 accept. We had evidently reached the term of the
 
 266 THE COALITION. 
 
 concessions of the great European powers to the new 
 state. The English cabinet, on this point, was in 
 perfect accordance w^ith the three cabinets of the 
 north, and more decided than any other not to ex- 
 ceed the limits which the treaty of the twenty-four 
 articles had assigned. The conclusive and unani- 
 mous adoption of this treaty was equally impor- 
 tant to the formation of the Belgic state and to the 
 consolidation of European peace. M. Mole acted 
 wisely in adhering to it, and in not allowing France, 
 when the essential points were obtained, to remain 
 isolated in Europe, and Belgium still in suspense. 
 
 The evacuation of Ancona was a more complex 
 question. The Pope demanded it. Austria, at the 
 same time, engaged to abandon the Legations. The 
 law of nations was not doubtful, but events have 
 taken upon themselves to show how much, from that 
 period, the great European cabinets have wanted 
 resolute and persevering foresight in the aiFairs of 
 Italy. In 1831, in presence of insurrection, they 
 had recommended and obtained in the Roman States 
 reforms insufficient to satisfy popular passions, but 
 which would have become salutary had they been 
 real. Nothing lowers or compromises power more 
 than submission without renouncement, and a belief 
 that it is justified in neglecting its promises as soon 
 as it finds them difficult to accomplish or capable of 
 being avoided. Sustained, in fact, by the court of 
 Vienna, the Papal government readily seized every 
 opportunity and motive for nullifying the reforms it 
 had decreed, and which the European cabinets, care-
 
 THE COALITION. 267 
 
 less or ill-disposed, took no pains to maintain by 
 rendering them serious and effective. After all that 
 has passed since that epoch, and in face of what is 
 passing now, I persist in thinking that the Roman 
 question, — that is to say, the reform of the internal 
 government of the Roman States, might be effected 
 without the temporal spoliation of the Papacy. The 
 work is difficult, but not impossible, and it was then, 
 as now, a work of necessity. They deceive them- 
 selves strangely who believe that, in presence of the 
 events in which we are all participators, the Roman 
 question is on the point of being determined. It is 
 not the solution which approaches, it is the chaos 
 that begins. No one can estimate the perturbation 
 which would be, I do not wish to say will be, thrown 
 into the social and moral condition of Europe by the 
 disorganization of the Catholic Church, and the 
 prostration of the base on which it reposes. The 
 honour and safety of the Christian world require that 
 the government of the Ronian States should be re- 
 formed, but not that the Papacy should be over- 
 thrown. From 1831 to 1838 a decided action exer- 
 cised upon the court of Rome by the great European 
 powers would have attained this double end. By the 
 occupation of Ancona, that military and diplomatic 
 coup de main of M. Casimir Perier, France was in a 
 position to place herself at the head of the important 
 work. She could, from that point, at once press 
 upon the courts of Rome and Vienna, encourage and 
 equally restrain the hopes of the Roman populations, 
 and infuse into the government of the Papal States a
 
 268 THE COALITION. 
 
 profound reform without subverting Italy and de- 
 naturalizing the Papacy. By giving up Ancona, 
 M. Mole deprived France of all means of action and 
 chance of success. The court of Rome fell back into 
 its habitual inertness ; Austria reassumed in Italy her 
 inmiovable preponderance; and the Roman question 
 found itself still more loaded with embarrassments 
 and perils. 
 
 In the midst of all these foreiG:n and domestic 
 incidents, and throughout the whole duration of 
 M. Mole's cabinet, I preserved a tranquil attitude, 
 free in my language, but a stranger to all active or 
 disguised hostility. On several occasions, including 
 the intervention in Spain, the affairs of Algeria, the 
 treaty of the Tafna, and the Greek loan, I spoke in 
 support of the policy and demands of the cabinet, 
 either because they linked themselves to the acts of 
 the preceding administration, or because I found 
 them conformable to public right and the interests of 
 the country. Twice only I was led, in the debates 
 in the Chamber of Deputies, to mark distinctly my 
 opinion and personal position; not attacking the 
 cabinet, but caring little for the displeasure it might 
 feel, or the result that might ensue. 
 
 During the first days of May 1837, a fortnight 
 after my rupture with M. Mole, the Chamber of De- 
 puties discussed the demand for extraordinary secret 
 funds presented by the cabinet. In the course of 
 this debate, I was called upon to name the causes of 
 my retirement. I explained myself with reserve, 
 avoiding all personal controversy, but insisting on
 
 THE COiVLITION. 269 
 
 the necessity of a strong and homogeneous organiza- 
 tion of the different parties and the ministry, for the 
 mutual interest of liberty and power. On this oc- 
 casion I spoke of the democracy and the middle class, 
 of their relations and mission in our social state, and 
 in the bosom of free institutions. M. Odilon-Barrot, 
 in reply, repeated the reproach he had already ad- 
 dressed to me more than once. " You wish," he 
 said, " to establish an exclusive system which would 
 tend to no less than a division of France into hostile 
 castes. The middle class rejects this ill-omened 
 present, this monopoly of victory. You forget then 
 that all the triumphs of our revolution were gained 
 by the world at large; you forget that the blood 
 which has flowed, at home and abroad, for the inde- 
 pendence or liberty of France, is the blood of the 
 whole world." 
 
 " No," I exclaimed, " I do not forget this. It is 
 true, our Charter contains rights which have been 
 conquered for all the world, which are the price of 
 the blood of all the world. These rights are, equality 
 in public charges, equal admission to all public em- 
 ployment, liberty of labour, liberty of worship, the 
 liberty of the press, and individual liberty ! These 
 rights, amongst us, are those of the whole world; 
 they belong to all classes of Frenchmen ; they are 
 well worthy of having been conquered by the battles 
 we have fought, and the victories we have won. 
 
 " There is yet another reward of these battles and 
 victories; yourselves, gentlemen, the government of 
 which you form a part, this Chamber, our consti-
 
 270 THE COALITION. 
 
 tutional royalty, this is what the blood of all France 
 has conquered; this is what the entire nation has 
 received from victory as the price of its efforts and 
 its courage. Do you find this insufficient for noble 
 ambition and generous sentiments? Will it be ne- 
 cessary, after this, to establish that absurd political 
 equality, that blind universality of political rights 
 which hides itself at the bottom of every theory 
 lately enunciated from this tribune ? Do not say that 
 I refuse to, or dispute with, the French nation, the 
 price of its victories, the price of its blood poured 
 forth in our fifty years of revolutions. But, appa- 
 rently, France has not intended to live always in 
 revolution ; she has assuredly reckoned that at the 
 close of these combats, and for the security of all the 
 privileges she has conquered, a regular, fixed order 
 would be established, a free and reasonable govern- 
 ment, capable of guaranteeing the rights of all by 
 the direct and active interposition of that part of the 
 nation truly capable of exercising political power. 
 This is what I meant to say wlien I spoke of the 
 necessity of instituting and organizing the middle 
 class. Have I assigned the limits of that class? 
 Have you heard me say where it was to commence 
 or end? I have carefully abstained from doing so. 
 I have neither distinguished it from any superior 
 section, nor from the inferior orders. I have simj^ly 
 stated this general fact, that in a great country such 
 as France there exists a class not devoted to manual 
 labour, not living by wages, able to dedicate a con- 
 siderable portion of its time and faculties to public
 
 THE COALITION. 271 
 
 business ; possessing not only the necessary fortune 
 for such an undertaking, but also the lights and in- 
 dependence without which a similar work could never 
 be accompUshed. When, by the course of time, this 
 natural limit of political capacity shall be removed, 
 when knowledge, the progress of wealth, and all the 
 causes which change the state of society shall have 
 rendered a greater number of men capable of exer- 
 cising political power with sound judgment and inde- 
 pendence, then the legal boundary will also change. 
 It is the perfection of our government that political 
 rights, limited to those who are capable of exercising 
 them, may extend as capacity extends ; and such is 
 at the same time the admirable virtue of this govern- 
 ment, that it excites incessantly the extension of 
 that capacity ; that it scatters on all sides learning, 
 intelligence, and independence; so that, while as- 
 signing a limit to political rights, at the same moment 
 it labours to displace that limit, to extend it, and 
 thus to elevate the nation at large. 
 
 " How can you believe, how could any one believe, 
 that it ever entered my mind to constitute the middle 
 class in a narrow privileged form, to remould it into 
 somethino; reserablino; our ancient aristocracies ? 
 Allow me to say, that in so doing I should have re- 
 nounced the opinions I have maintained through life ; 
 I should have abandoned the cause I have ever 
 defended, the work in which I have had the honour 
 to assist under your eyes and by your hands. When 
 I applied myself to spread education throughout the 
 country, when I sought to elevate in intellectual
 
 272 THE COALITION. 
 
 order the classes who live by labour, to give them 
 the knowledge they require for their position, — this 
 was on my part, and on the part of the entire govern- 
 ment, a continued incitement to acquire universal 
 information, to rise to a higher sphere. It was the 
 beginning of that work of civilization, of that gene- 
 rally ascending movement, the desire of which is 
 implanted in human nature, and which it is the duty 
 of all administrations to encourage. I repel, there- 
 fore, I repel utterly these accusations of a narrow 
 system, foreign to the general interests and senti- 
 ments of the nation, and solely applicable to the 
 individual advantage of a special class of citizens. I 
 repel them most emphatically, and at the same time 
 I assert that the moment has arrived for shaking off 
 those worn-out revolutionary ideas, those absurd 
 prepossessions of absolute equality in political rights, 
 which, wherever they have prevailed, have extin- 
 guished real justice and liberty. 
 
 " Much is said of democracy. I am accused of 
 disowning its rights and interests. Ah ! gentlemen, 
 what has so often injured democracy is, that it has 
 not acquired a true feeling of human dignity ; it has 
 neither understood nor chosen to admit that variety, 
 that hierarchy of positions which naturally develop 
 themselves in the social state, and which allow with- 
 out reserve the ascendant tendency in individuals, 
 and mutual competition according to relative merit. 
 Neither liberty nor the advancement of the working 
 classes have satisfied democracy ; it demands level- 
 ling; and this is the reason why it has so often and
 
 THE COALITION. 273 
 
 SO rapidly ruined the societies in which it has pre- 
 dominated. 
 
 " For myself, I am one of those determined to 
 oppose the levelling principle, no matter under what 
 form it may present itself. I am resolved to call 
 u]3on the whole nation to advance, but at the same 
 time reminding it, that advancement has its special 
 and imperative conditions ; that it requires capacity, 
 intelligence, virtue, industry, and a host of inciting 
 ao-encies which all men are not able to command. 
 
 " I desire that wherever these agencies are found, 
 wherever there is capacity, virtue and industry, the 
 democratic class may elevate itself to the highest 
 positions of the state ; that it may ascend this tri- 
 bune, raise its voice here, and exercise its influence 
 over all the affairs of the country. But you possess 
 this privilege already, gentlemen ; you have no occa- 
 sion to demand it. You live in the midst of a society 
 more completely thrown open to progress and the 
 expectation of equality, than any that has ever yet 
 appeared. Never has there been seen such a con- 
 course of individuals raised to the highest rank in 
 every career : we have nearly all won our positions 
 by the sweat of our brows and on the field of battle." 
 
 M. Odilon-Barrot : "If this were to begin again. 
 
 M. Guizot : " M. Odilon-Barrot is right ; it is to 
 begin again, to-day and for ever." 
 
 M. Odilon-Barrot: " You have mistaken my idea. 
 These illustrative cases occurred in a time of equality, 
 and if that were to be repeated " 
 
 VOL. IV. T
 
 274 THE COALITION. 
 
 M. Guizot : " It seems to me that tlie honourable 
 M. Barrot is indulging here in a strange illusion. I 
 
 spoke just now of every kind of illustration 
 
 The honourable M. Barrot himself supplies a faithful 
 instance ; he has won his position in our own days, 
 under our eyes, in the midst of us, under the system 
 of which I speak, and not at any other epoch. There 
 are many men who in opposite careers have raised 
 and are raising themselves as he has done. I should 
 repudiate absolutely an advantage applicable to a 
 single generation, even though it were my own case. 
 I do not understand that after all the political vic- 
 tories of the French nation, we have conquered for 
 ourselves alone the rights that we possess. No, we 
 have won them for our children, for our grand- 
 children, and for our descendants throughout all 
 ages. This is what I understand, this is what I am 
 proud of ; this is true liberty, generous and productive 
 liberty, in the midst of that envious, jealous, uneasy, 
 and shuffling democracy which seeks to reduce every- 
 thing to its own level, and is discontented if it sees 
 one head raise itself above another. 
 
 " God forbid that our country should continue in- 
 fected by such a deplorable disease ! • I explain it to 
 myself in the times it has passed through, in the 
 struggles it has sustained ; when it laboured to over- 
 throw absolute power and privilege, it called to its 
 aid, indiscriminately, every variety of force, dan- 
 gerous or useful, lawful or unlawful, good and evil 
 passions. All these appeared upon the fields of 
 action, and all looked for their share in the plunder.
 
 THE COALITION. 275 
 
 But to-day the contest is over, peace is made, the 
 treaty concluded : that treaty is the Charter and free 
 government. I do not desire that my country should 
 repeat anew what it has accomplished. I accept 
 1791, 1792, even the following years; while con- 
 demning them I accept them in history ; but I do not 
 desire them for the future, and I hold it is a duty of 
 conscience to warn my country as often as I see it 
 inclining in that direction. 
 
 " Such is my policy, gentlemen, my only policy. 
 Such is the sense in which I understand the words 
 middle class and democracy, liberty and equality, so 
 often repeated, and a moment since in this tribune. 
 Nothing, gentlemen, will induce me to deviate from 
 the meaning I attach to them. I have risked for it all 
 that man can hold most dear in public life,- — I have 
 risked popularity. I have not been unacquainted with 
 popularity. You may remember, gentlemen, M. 
 Barrot may remember, a time when we served toge- 
 ther, when we fought under the same flag. At that 
 time he may recollect that I was popular; I have 
 beheld popular applause frequently present itself 
 before me; I enjoyed it much, very much; it was a 
 beautiful and delightful emotion. I have renounced 
 it, — yes, I have renounced it. I know that such 
 popularity does not attach itself to the ideas I am 
 now defending, to the policy I maintain at present ; 
 but I know also there is another kind of popularity, 
 the confidence we inspire in the social interests of a 
 great country, the confidence of those regular and 
 conservative interests which I regard as the founda-
 
 276 THE COALITION. 
 
 tion on which society is based. This is the confidence 
 I have sought for in place of that seductive and 
 dehghtful popularity with which I was formerly 
 acquainted. I aspire to the esteem and confidence of 
 the friends of order, of lawful and liberal order ; to 
 the confidence of men who believe that France is in 
 possession of the rights and institutions she has been 
 seeking since 1789, and that her most important 
 occupation at present should be to preserve and 
 strengthen them. 
 
 " This is the cause to which I have devoted myself; 
 this is the popularity I covet. This will console me 
 for the rest, and I shall envy no one the possession of 
 any other kind of popularity, however genial it may 
 be." 
 
 The Chamber was profoundly moved and satisfied. 
 Nothing gratifies men more than to see their own 
 ideas clearly elucidated, and to recognize themselves 
 in an image which raises them in their own eyes. 
 From that time people began to adopt what has since 
 become the favourite common-place expression in the 
 policy of the extreme parties. They imputed to the 
 general body of the citizens the design of becoming, 
 and the accusation of having already become, a new 
 privileged class, the inheritors of the old nobility, to 
 the exclusion of and at the expense of the people. 
 They taxed them with thinking of nothing but their 
 own interests, with coldness, egotism, sordid views, 
 and mean-spirited propensities. I have some right 
 to speak of the weaknesses of the middle class, for 
 perhaps, more than any one else, I have suffered from
 
 THE COALITION. 277 
 
 their inconveniences and borne their weight. It is 
 true, that called abruptly, although by the natural 
 course of things, to take a preponderating part in 
 the government of France, this class has not always 
 proved equal to its novel and arduous task. The 
 grandeur of thought and the resolution of experience 
 were sometimes deficient. It has been occasionally 
 too much alarmed at the political fermentation, to 
 which it yielded too readily ; it has not always known 
 how alternately to undertake and how to persevere 
 enough. It w^s not itself exempt from the errors 
 and mischievous tendencies against which it con- 
 tended ; but, in spite of its improvidences and mis- 
 takes, it was not less the true, honest, and faithful 
 representative of the general interests of French 
 society, such as that society had been made by the 
 Revolution. No desire of exclusive privilege or 
 oppressive system entered into its calculation ; no evil 
 of that character could result from the institutions 
 it loved and supported. These were truly free and 
 open institutions, unmingled with any species of 
 tyranny, accessible to all rights and to unrestricted 
 progress. The declared partisans of universal and 
 immediate equality alone had any pretence for taxing 
 the citizen class with usurpation and injustice. With 
 the exception of this radical section all shades of 
 opinion, interests, and parties enjoyed the perspective 
 of an unfettered career. All could advance accord- 
 ing to their true merit and actual strength. A day 
 will come when the storm which then began to raise 
 itself against the middle class will be pronounced one 
 
 T 3
 
 278 THE COALITION. 
 
 of the most senseless aberrations of popular cre- 
 dulity ever engendered by revolutionary passion ; and 
 I merely anticipated that day when, in May 1837, I 
 defended that class and the institutions in which it 
 predominated against the gathering tempest. Its 
 gratitude was testified with unusual ardour. Two 
 hundred and six deputies joined in requesting per- 
 mission to reprint a portion of my two speeches, and 
 to circulate them in their departments. More than 
 thirty thousand copies were speedily distributed. The 
 opposition itself, while maintaining its attitude, took 
 pleasure in this grand parliamentary scene ; and the 
 effect produced in the Chamber spread itself through- 
 out the country, as much as such effects can extend 
 beyond the place and the day where the presence of 
 the individual speakers and the power of words have 
 impressed the spectators. 
 
 The cabinet was injured by the echo of this de- 
 bate in which it had taken so small a share. The 
 opposition, by whom it was received favourably as 
 long as the question involved the overthrow of the 
 preceding government, took pleasure in fomenting 
 the discontent of the new ministers by proclaiming 
 the importance of the men they had separated from. 
 M. Thiers came to their aid, as he had promised the 
 King ; but extraneous support cannot restore the 
 power it tries to uphold. M. Mole, of a delicate 
 and susceptible nature, felt these wounds keenly; the 
 more so that beyond the Chambers the marriage of 
 the Duke of Orleans, the amnesty, and the second 
 expedition to Constantine inspired him with satisfac-
 
 THE COALITION. 279 
 
 tion and the confidence of success. Irritated by this 
 contrast, he considered the moment propitious for 
 giving himself a parliamentary position in harmony 
 with his external strength. He proposed to the King 
 the dissolution of the Chamber of Deputies. No 
 political or general necessity called for this step. The 
 Chamber had adopted all the propositions of the 
 ministry, who still held a majority, while the oppo- 
 sition was more ironical than aggressive. It was 
 evidently to gratify his self-love and ease that M. 
 Mole desired the dissolution. The King consented to 
 it with some reluctance. The elections took place, 
 not as a public struggle between the great opinions 
 and parties of the country, but as a mingled conflict 
 of candidates, supported or rejected by the Ad- 
 ministration as they were presumed to be friendly or 
 hostile. Out of 459 deputies, 152, springing from 
 very opposite ranks, were replaced by new-comers ; 
 and amongst those who lost their seats were several 
 of my own particular friends, staunch defenders of 
 the policy of resistance, who looked upon it as ener- 
 vated and compromised by the attitude of M. Mole. 
 The number included MM. D'Haubersaert, Giraud, 
 Renouard, &c., who were especially opposed and ex- 
 pelled by the cabinet. These elections, thus con- 
 ducted, without defined principles and any de- 
 clared standard, produced a disorganised Chamber, 
 with no steady, public engagements, governed by 
 individual interests and feelings, in the bosom of 
 which M. Mole might possibly find the scattered 
 elements of a favourable majority, but wherein the 
 
 T 4
 
 280 THE COALITION. 
 
 great governing party, commenced under M. Casimir 
 Perier, and already disunited by the fall of the 
 cabinet of the 11th of October, 1832, underwent a 
 new crisis of disruption and enfeeblement. 
 
 When the session opened, the consequences of this 
 state of parties and minds speedily manifested itself. 
 In both Chambers the addresses were all that the 
 cabinet could desire. Amongst the bills presented, 
 those of minor importance, or such as had already 
 been the object of long debates in preceding Cham- 
 bers, were readily passed. But when great and 
 difficult questions arose, where the cabinet had to 
 adopt and carry its resolutions on the conversion of 
 the funds, and on constructing the general net-work 
 of railroads, then its weakness appeared. Political 
 authority was found wanting. It rested on no party 
 strongly knit together, bound to it by fixed convic- 
 tions, and determined to support it in the interest of 
 their common cause. Its definitive intentions were 
 vacillating. It carried into the debates little power 
 and brilliancy. The two propositions I have alluded 
 to were thrown out, and the elections looked upon 
 as victorious eventuated in a cold and barren session. 
 
 The only debate essentially political, the demand 
 for a new and extraordinary credit on account of the 
 secret funds, was marked by the same character, and 
 I took part in it myself with indifference and embar- 
 rassment. I neither wished to refuse the secret sup- 
 plies, nor to assume towards the ministry an attitude 
 of general and permanent opposition. I confined 
 myself to noting with regret the instability of power,
 
 THE COALITION. 281 
 
 the decline of the Chamber itself, and the weakness 
 it imparted to the entire government. I was coldly 
 listened to as I spoke. My old adversaries of the 
 Left asked, with a smile, if I was not myself tainted 
 with weakness and decay. I saw the coming storm, 
 I warned others of its approach ; but I was not de- 
 sirous of being accused of raising it. 
 
 After the session of 1838, and in the interval 
 which separated it from that of 1839, the flaw in 
 M. Mole's position developed itself rapidly. He had 
 exhausted the influence which his accession to office 
 gave him, the adhesion of the Third Party, and even 
 of the Left, These transient allies abandoned him, 
 and he failed to acquire, in the course of his adminis- 
 tration, new and personal force. His prudence, his 
 favourable attitude, his well-timed and agreeable lan- 
 guage preserved for him, in the Chamber and with 
 the country, a degree of favour unaccompanied by 
 real power. Europe esteemed him, and congratulated 
 herself on his policy, but without relying on his 
 strength. He still enjoyed a tranquil and easy present, 
 but his future in perspective was menaced and weak. 
 
 No sooner had the session of 1839 commenced 
 than the mischief burst forth ; all causes of discontent 
 expressed themselves loudly ; animated by the same 
 humour the diflerent shades of opposition drew to- 
 wards each other. It was asked if they should 
 accept indefinitely a decaying and wavering adminis- 
 tration, seeking support alternately from opposing 
 ranks, passing from resistance to concession, from 
 concession to resistance, and which, under the guise
 
 282 THE COALITION. 
 
 of conciliation, placed the government beyond the 
 influence of all clear, steady, and consistent opinions, 
 and drove from its side their most approved repre- 
 sentatives? Wliy did not this conciliation so much 
 vaunted penetrate the bosom of the opposition itself? 
 Why did not M. Odilon-Barrot, M. Thiers, and M. 
 Guizot, endeavour to understand each other and act 
 in concert, even for a moment, and with a special 
 and decided object? When M. Mole separated from 
 M. Guizot, had not M. Mole arranged with M. Thiers 
 and M. Odilon-Barrot to change policy, and substi- 
 tute concession for resistance? This bad example 
 became contagious at the very moment when its 
 mischievous results were making themselves felt. 
 The coalition worked its effects on minds and in con- 
 versation before passing into speeches and votes. 
 
 I embarked in it openly and actively. Before 
 estimating the fact and its consequences I shall state 
 the motives by which I was determined. 
 
 I was earnestly bent on recalling the government 
 to a more decided and consistent policy. For nine 
 years I had alternately defended and carried the 
 standard of resolute authority in presence of auda- 
 cious freedom. I suffered in my inmost soul when I 
 saw this flag, not abandoned, but half wound up and 
 shrouded. It is the natural and admirable effect of 
 free government, that the great parties of which it is 
 formed attach themselves to principles, and desire to 
 proclaim while practising them. It is essential that 
 minds should be satisfied and elevated at the same 
 time that interests are guaranteed and confided. I
 
 THE COALITION. 283 
 
 do not think I go too far wlien I affirm that, during 
 the administration of M. Casimir Perier, and that 
 of the cabinet of the 11th of October, 1832, the 
 Chamber and the public participated in this double 
 satisfaction. M. Mole gave it not to them ; he suf- 
 ficed from day to day for the necessities of order 
 under a free system, but without exercising or 
 securing liberty and order in durability by his per- 
 sonal influence. It was a regular and rational govern- 
 ment ; but vigour and intellectual riches were want- 
 ing to it ; the drama was greater and more animated 
 than the actors. 
 
 Amongst the causes of this unproductive languor 
 was the inadequate share taken by the Chamber of 
 Deputies. It neither held the place nor played the 
 part to which it was called by the nature of our 
 institutions, and the state of parties. Five political 
 groups constituted and gave life to this assembly. 
 At the extremities the Republicans and the Legiti- 
 mists were expressed, I will not say led, by M. 
 Garnier-Pages and M. Berryer ; between these two 
 factions, important by ideas and talent if not by 
 number, stood the Right Centre, the Left Centre, and 
 the Left, represented by M. Odilon-Barrot, M. Thiers, 
 and myself. None of these groups, not more those 
 who accepted than the others who rejected the new sys- 
 tem had, by their avowed chiefs, a direct and effective 
 action in the government. The principal and habi- 
 tual agents were in the rank of spectators divested 
 of responsibility, and tempted to give themselves up 
 to the pleasures of criticism. From conviction as
 
 284 THE COALITION. 
 
 much as from position, I felt strongly what I shall 
 permit m^^self to call this parliamentary disorder, 
 and I considered it urgent in the interest of power 
 and of liberty, of the crown and of the country, that 
 the Chamber of Deputies, and its public interpreters, 
 should resume in public affairs their natural share of 
 influence and personal responsibility. 
 
 Another consideration moved me. Since the fall 
 of the cabinet of the 11th of October, 1832, and my 
 separation from M. Thiers, the basis of the govern- 
 ment had become closely contracted ; rivalries, jea- 
 lousies, internal and unforeseen difficulties, tended to 
 restrict it still more from day to day. An oppor- 
 tunity occurred of escaping from this narrow track, 
 and of widening the circle of future cabinets by the 
 introduction of men who, despite the difference of 
 their positions and habits, adopted in reality the 
 same ideas, inclined towards the same end, and were 
 not of necessity, as they had not always been, incom- 
 patible. Between M. Odilon-Barrot, M. Thiers, and 
 myself, when our hearts were sounded, there were no 
 insurmountable barriers, no irrevocable engagements ; 
 we had for eighteen months made many material 
 advances. Had not the moment arrived for a more 
 decisive step ? All three unconnected with the 
 administration of M. MoM, we had ceased to oppose 
 each other. Was it not possible to come to an under- 
 standing, and reconstruct together a great consti- 
 tutional party capable of establishing on enlarged 
 foundations the free and monarcliical government we 
 mutually desired to establish, and the destinies of
 
 THE COALITION. 285 
 
 wliicli our dissensions, under the fire of its enemies, 
 were capable of compromising? The importance of 
 such a work was evident, and however slight might 
 be the chance of success, it was assuredly worth the 
 attempt. 
 
 I was too well acquainted ^vith human weaknesses, 
 including my own, to doubt that personal feelings 
 might mingle with these views of public interest. 
 Egotism is infinitely skilful in insinuating and con- 
 cealing itself in the bosom of the sincerest patriotism ; 
 and I will not afi&rm that the recollection of my 
 rupture with M. Mole, in 1837, and the secret desire 
 of personal retaliation, while supporting a good public 
 cause, may have been without its influence on my 
 adhesion to the coalition in 1839, and the ardour 
 with which I accompanied it. Even with the most 
 honest of men political life is not the chosen avoca- 
 tion of saints : it has its necessities and obscurities 
 which, with a good or ill grace, we recognize while 
 submitting to them; it excites passions and supplies 
 opportunities for self- complaisance, from which no 
 one, if he conscientiously examines his soul after the 
 trial, can feel confident of having entirely escaped; 
 and he who has not made up his mind to bear with 
 tranquillity the weight of the complications and im- 
 perfections inherent in the most upright public life, 
 will do well to confine himself to privacy and pure 
 speculation. 
 
 Be this as it may, I relate without addition or 
 reserve the disposition I brought to the committee on 
 the address. The various shades of the opposition
 
 286 THE COALITION. 
 
 were present there in a majority. They agreed with- 
 out difficulty, and the draft of the address pre- 
 sented on the 4th of January, 1839, to the Chamber 
 of Deputies, was their free and deliberate work.^ 
 The external policy of the cabinet was therein for- 
 mally censured as to the evacuation of Ancona, 
 On the negotiations in the affairs of Belgium and 
 Switzerland, the address maintained reserve in which 
 intentional anxiety was manifested. Internally, the 
 cabinet was considered insufficient to establish be- 
 tween the Crown and the Chambers that steady 
 understanding and active harmony, which, under the 
 representative system, can alone guarantee the 
 strength and security of power by concentrating all 
 responsibility in its advisers. I think to-day, as I 
 thought then, that on this participation of the Cham- 
 bers in the government of the country, the drafts 
 of the address, otherwise sincerely and avowedly 
 monarchical, did not exceed the limits of constitu- 
 tional right. The general tone wanted neither mea- 
 sure nor conformity in its coldness. But the attack 
 was palpable and direct. No one affected to misun- 
 derstand it ; and the cabinet accepted the contest as 
 frankly as it was offered by the opposition. 
 
 The struggle was fiercer than the opposition looked 
 for. During twelve days M. Mol(3 displayed a firm- 
 ness and presence of mind, a becoming and able 
 perseverance which animated the zeal, at first a little 
 wavering, of his partisans, and compelled his o]> 
 
 • See Historic Documents, No. XII.
 
 THE COALITION. 287 
 
 ponents to redouble their efforts. On all the para- 
 graphs in the draft of the address, in which the 
 policy of the cabinet was directly or indirectly in- 
 criminated, amendments were proposed to rebut the 
 censure ; and after long debates, in which M. Mole, 
 faithfully seconded by his supporters, nobly defended 
 himself, nearly all the amendments were adopted by 
 very weak majorities, but despite the combined efforts 
 of the leaders of all the different degrees of op- 
 position. Thus we were definitively led to vote 
 against the address so amended, which was adopted 
 in revenge, with a mixture of satisfaction and anger, 
 by the partisans of the cabinet, mortally stricken but 
 still erect on the ground it had so valiantly defended. 
 In this combat it found a brilliant ally. M. de 
 Lamartine, who until then had held a little aloof from 
 the militant policy, took an energetic part against the 
 coalition. I cannot encounter the name of M. de 
 Lamartine in my reminiscences, or himself in our 
 streets, without an impression of profound melan- 
 choly. No man ever received from God more valuable 
 gifts, — gifts of person and position, of intellectual 
 power and social elevation. Neither have favourable 
 circumstances been withheld from him, in addition to 
 those original advantages ; every chance, as well as 
 every means of success, have attended his steps. He 
 grappled them with ardour ; for a moment he played 
 a lofty part in a lofty drama ; he reached the end of 
 the highest ambition, and enjoyed its most consum- 
 mate glories. Where is he now ? I speak not 
 of the reverses of his public career, nor of the
 
 288 THE COALITION. 
 
 trials of his private life. In our days who has not 
 fallen ? Who has not experienced the blows of 
 fate, the anguish of the soul, the inflictions of for- 
 tune ? Labour, disappointment, sacrifice, and suffer- 
 ing have held in all times, and will continue to hold, 
 their place and portion in the destiny of man, — with 
 the exalted more than with the humble. What sur- 
 prises and saddens me is that M. de Lamartine should 
 be astonished or irritated at this. It is not alone the 
 pain of his position, but the state of his feelings, such 
 as he has revealed them to us, which I cannot con- 
 template without melancholy. How can a spectator 
 who looks on events from such a height, be so in- 
 tensely moved by the accidents which affect himself ? 
 How can such a sagacious appreciator of other men 
 be possessed of so little self-knowledge ? How does 
 he abandon himself to so much bitterness after such 
 extensive enjoyment of the favours of Heaven and of 
 the world ? In that richly endowed nature there 
 must be great blanks and a want of controlling har- 
 mony, to cause his fall into such internal trouble and 
 its manifestation with so much vehemence. I have 
 seen too little of M. de Lamartine to know and under- 
 stand him thoroughly : he seemed to me like a beau- 
 tiful tree covered with flowers, without fruit that 
 ripens or roots that hold ; a brilliant meteor without 
 fixed place, and with no assigned course in the 
 general system of the firmament ; a great spirit in- 
 cessantly passing and repassing from the regions of 
 light to those of clouds, and catching at every step a 
 glimpse of truth without being arrested by it ; a
 
 THE COALITION. 289 
 
 noble heart, open to all generous sympathies, but 
 still governed by personal prepossessions. And I 
 am more confirmed in my general impression of this 
 eminent man, as I perceived in his first appearance in 
 the midst of our debates, in his speeches of the 10th 
 and 19th of January, 1839, on the coalition, the 
 features I recognize at present. He attacked the 
 coalition warmly, but without rescuing and almost 
 giving up M. Mol^, for he wished to please the oppo- 
 sition as well as the friends of the cabinet. He 
 defended the prerogative of the crown while treating 
 constitutional monarchy as a government of transi- 
 tion, and occasionally sufi*ering his republican ten- 
 dencies to escape. He paid compliments and made 
 advances alternately to all the parties which divided 
 the Chamber, without classing himself with any one 
 in particular, endeavouring to draw them to himself 
 without giving himself to them ; and when in the 
 midst of this flattering description of all the internal 
 fractions of the assembly, M. Arago demanded from 
 his place, " And what of the social party ? " "I am 
 asked what is the social party," replied M. de 
 Lamartine ; " Gentlemen, it is no longer a party, it 
 is an idea ;" casting around his blandishments, so to 
 speak, in all directions, to obtain universal admiration 
 and assent. His language was that of a great but 
 superficial ambitionist, more greedy of incense than 
 of empire, ready to rush with haughty improvidence 
 into the most hazardous attempts, prodigal to all of 
 hopes and promises, but ofi*ering nothing beyond 
 vague and incoherent perspectives which disappoint 
 
 VOL. IV. u
 
 290 THE CO^UilTION. 
 
 the desires tlicy excite. To be effective and truly 
 great, policy demands a more distinct end; a firmer 
 and more simple choice between ideas, designs, and 
 parties. In his attack on the coalition, M. de Lamar- 
 tine was, on the side of the cabinet, the oratorical 
 ornament of the debate ; but he left it, more cele- 
 brated than influential, without obtaining the serious 
 confidence even of those to whom he had lent his 
 eloquent support. 
 
 The address being voted, M. Mole and his col- 
 leagues, justly considering their success too weak 
 for the burden, tendered their resignations to the 
 King. Called upon by his Majesty, Marshal Soult 
 attempted, without success, to form a cabinet. 
 M. Mole resumed office, and the dissolution of the 
 Chamber of Deputies was immediately announced. 
 This was the second time, Avithin two years, in which 
 M. Mole, to carry on his government, had been 
 obliged to appeal to the country. A single session 
 had sufficed to compromise the existence of the 
 cabinet in a Chamber assembled by himself, and the 
 election of wliich he regarded as his triumph. 
 
 This single fact established a strong presumption 
 against him. But the coalition, on its side, if it had 
 materially shaken tlie cabinet, had also seriously 
 compromised the opposition. We had been deficient 
 in plan and foresight. Some of our complaints 
 against the foreign policy of M. MoM were, in reality, 
 extremely questionable, and had been effectually dis- 
 puted in the debate ; we had fallen into the common 
 error of parties under a representative system, of
 
 THE COALITION. 291 
 
 exaggeration ; and on the points on which our attacks 
 were founded, such, for instance, as the evacuation 
 of Ancona, time and events had not yet vindicated our 
 views. Our second mistake, want of foresight, was 
 even more weighty. We had not sufficiently calcu- 
 lated the effect which would be produced upon re- 
 flecting and honest men, friends of order, and spec- 
 tators rather than actors in the political struggles, 
 by the reconciliation and alliance of parties so lately 
 in antagonism, and whose maxims, traditions, and 
 tendencies still continued so distinct. Not only did 
 these judges of the field, who formed the centre 
 of the Chamber, blame the coalition, and experience 
 severe uneasiness while witnessing its progress, but 
 anger sprang up in their hearts with censure and 
 inquietude. They opposed the coalition, at first for 
 the cabinet, but subsequently on their own account. 
 They displayed in this opposition an unusual degree 
 of ardour, accord, and perseverance ; and the govern- 
 ment party, dismembered and dispersed since the fall 
 of the cabinet of the 11th of October, 1832, came to 
 itself, and, without its old leaders, once more formed 
 round M. Mole, at the precise moment when we were 
 accusing M. Mole and his cabinet of being a govern- 
 ment too weak, too much estranged from the Chamber 
 of Deputies, and imable to secure for the country 
 and crown the active co-operation of all the consti- 
 tutional powers. Never, for three years, had the 
 government party been so compact, nor the cabinet 
 so certain of its support, as on the day when, the 
 victory between the ministry and the coalition being
 
 292 THE COALITION. 
 
 still undecided, the King, on the demand of M. M0I6, 
 and to sustain him to the end, appealed to the 
 country by declaring the dissolution. Springing up 
 under such auspices, the elections were strenuously 
 contested, and carried through as a grand pell-mell 
 of opinions and alliances. I endeavoured in several 
 printed letters to explain fully the reasons of public 
 interest which had induced me to join the coalition, 
 and the fidelity I intended to preserve to the policy 
 I had advocated for nine years, while demanding 
 what I considered the legitimate and necessary in- 
 fluence of the Chambers in the government.^ The 
 elections gave the coalition an evident but limited 
 triumph, M. Mole and his colleagues perceived that 
 in the new Chamber of Deputies they were unequal 
 to the struggle ; they accordingly retired definitively, 
 and the coalition was called to form a cabinet. 
 
 The work appeared to be easy, and the solution 
 naturally indicated. M. Odilon-Barrot, M. Thiers, 
 and myself, had participated together in the attack ; 
 we were now to share in the victory, and to pass 
 from concert in opposition to concert in ofiice. But 
 in this transition M. Odilon and I encountered an 
 obstacle, which in the debates on the coalition we had 
 ourselves overlooked. Our maxims, tendencies, con- 
 duct, and words had been for nine years profoundly 
 different; from the first months of 1830 we had been 
 not only divided but opposed. We had recently, in 
 our provisional alliance, reminded each other of this 
 
 • See Historic Documents, No. XIII.
 
 THE COALITION. 293 
 
 past, and declared our intention of not contradicting 
 it. The temptation of governing in common was 
 interdicted to us by the general state of parties, and 
 by our own honour. We entertained no such idea. 
 It was understood that M. Odilon-Barrot and I 
 could not enter the ministry together. 
 
 Between M. Thiers and me no similar difficulty 
 existed. We had maintained and practised the same 
 policy together ; we could conjointly resume power; 
 our past dealings and our present and prospective 
 union created no point of insurmountable embarrass- 
 ment. Could we not also, when forming a cabinet 
 in concert, accept M. Odilon-Barrot as President of 
 the Chamber of Deputies ? Here was an office un- 
 connected with the government and the opposition, 
 independent without being hostile. By the gravity 
 of his character and manners, by the elevation of his 
 mind, by his respect for law and liberty, M. Odilon 
 was eminently well suited to the post. The recon- 
 ciliation which the coalition had brought about 
 between us, authorized the friendly relations without 
 common action or responsibility, which ought to be 
 established between the ministry and the President 
 of the Chamber. I declared my readiness to admit 
 this combination. 
 
 But when M. Thiers and M. Barrot proposed it at 
 the meetings of the Left, Centre and the Left they 
 encountered an opposition to my admission to the 
 new cabinet in any capacity, which they surmounted 
 with difficulty; and their success was limited to a 
 stipulation by their friends that I should resume the 
 
 u 3
 
 294 THE COALITION. 
 
 ministry of Public Instruction, and M. Duchatel that 
 of Finance. This was all that our recent allies of 
 the coalition would allow to us, the old defenders of 
 the policy of resistance, in the parliamentary govern- 
 ment about to be restored. 
 
 I had lately given a proof, by contenting myself, 
 in the cabinet of M. ]\Iole, with the portfolio of 
 Public Instruction, of the little personal importance 
 I attached to any specific department, when I felt 
 otherwise confident that the general policy to which 
 I was devoted would prevail in the government. I 
 was not in 1839 more exacting than in 1836. I had 
 some right to feel surprised at the opposition I 
 encountered from the victorious coalition, for I had 
 not been anion o-st the least in its struo-o-le and 
 
 o (DO 
 
 triumph. More than once, in the course of that 
 great debate, several of the. coalescing parties had 
 been tempted to compromise, and to accept, at the 
 sacrifice of the resolute and clear address we had 
 drawn up, a few of the somewhat equivocal amend- 
 ments proposed by the friends of M. Mole. I had re- 
 jected and defeated these inclinations. As long as the 
 battle lasts all appearance of hesitation and retreat is an 
 error, even though we may repent of having engaged. 
 Assuredly M. Duchatel and I exhibited no very 
 exorbitant pretensions when proposing to join the 
 cabinet about to be formed under the presidency 
 of Marshal Soult ; we only required two departments 
 out of nine ; but it was at least reasonable, that if not 
 in number, in quality these departments should suffi- 
 ciently guarantee our influence and action. The
 
 THE COALITION. 295 
 
 more decided I had been in the coalition, the more 
 I determined to remain, when in power, faithful to 
 the policy of order and resistance. To satisfy what 
 I regarded as a right, and a specific interest of the 
 parliamentary system, I had separated at the moment 
 from the body of my friends; the end obtained, I 
 was anxious to re-establish their position as well as 
 my own, to rally them round the government of 
 which they were the natural and necessary allies, 
 and to assure their influence in the new cabinet, 
 together with their support to its measures. This, 
 with me, was a question of political duty and per- 
 sonal dignity. I declared that I could not join the 
 ministry unless, while M. Thiers filled, according to 
 his desire, the department of Foreign Aifairs, and 
 some of his friends were appointed to other posts, 
 M. Duchatel should receive the portfolio of Finance, 
 and I that of the Interior. I laid little stress on the 
 numerical equality of offices; but I demanded abso- 
 lutely, for my cause, a real division of power. 
 
 M. Thiers, and I believe also M. Odilon-Barrot, 
 endeavoured, but without success, to induce their op- 
 ponents to accept this arrangement. In the Left and 
 Left Centre, they were as determined that I should 
 not exercise a direct and important action in the 
 government as I was resolved not to be satisfied with 
 an indirect and ineffective influence. Men are much 
 more governed by their instincts and prejudices than 
 by their real and well-considered intentions. The 
 greater portion of the members of the Left and Left 
 Centre had, in reality, no other end or desire than the 
 
 u4
 
 296 THE COALITION. 
 
 cstablislimcnt of the constitutional monarchy ; but 
 they had lived, and still lived, under the empire of 
 revolutionary theories, traditions, and routines. 
 Although they had no design to react the Revolution, 
 they accepted it helter-skelter, and without exami- 
 nation. I had endeavoured, on the contrary, to 
 submit this contemporaneous past to a free inquiry, 
 to separate openly the good from the evil, the truth 
 from the falsehood, the sound grain from the chaff ; 
 and to show that our misfortunes and mistakes since 
 1789, had not resulted from imprudent exaggerations 
 or accidents beyond the reach of foresight, but were 
 the natural consequences of the false ideas, bad pas- 
 sions and extravagant pretensions with which that 
 great social and intellectual movement had been 
 infected, and from which it was imperatively neces- 
 sary that it should be purified. In this difficult 
 undertaking I had clashed with cherished sentiments, 
 wounded susceptible vanities, offended superstitions, 
 and disturbed rooted habits. I was looked upon as 
 aggressive, officious, and compromising. They wished 
 to do without me, and witliout having incessantly to 
 dispute or reckon with me on the affairs of the new 
 system we were all vowed to defend. 
 
 The lofty and liberal spirits, the leaders of the 
 parties, felt the vice of this disposition of their sup- 
 porters, and the advantage of my concurrence in the 
 work we were pursuing together. But in our days 
 it is the error of the most distinguished men to want 
 confidence in themselves, in their o^vn ideas and 
 personal strength, and to yield too readiiy to
 
 THE COALITION. 297 
 
 extraneous impressions and desires. Of what use 
 is it to tliem to hold their heads above the crowd, if 
 they do not profit by this superiority to extend their 
 views and march more directly to their end? They 
 know not what additional power they would wield if 
 they acted with greater independence, and in the 
 plenitude of their own convictions. I am far from 
 denying the value of popular feelings and the neces- 
 sity of considering them; but they ought to be 
 anticipated and justly estimated beforehand, instead 
 of waiting until they expound and decide themselves ; 
 for, in fact, peoples and parties trust to those who 
 regulate their affairs skilfully, in preference to leaders 
 who obey them. 
 
 The combination called " the Cabinet of the great 
 Coalition," and which united all the components of its 
 strength, being set aside, every variety was tried from 
 which I and my friends could be excluded. Propo- 
 sitions were made, debates and negotiations were 
 entered into to form, at one time, a ministry from 
 the Left Centre allied to the Left; at another, from 
 the Left Centre exclusively, or rather, from the Left 
 Centre reinforced from the Centre, properly so called, 
 amongst the adherents of M. Mole. It was round 
 Marshal Soult, and under the flag of his Presidency, 
 that this attempt was carried on ; he applied himself 
 to the work with supple and tenacious judgment, 
 though with some degree of confusion, holding him- 
 self apart from the internal dissensions of the Chamber, 
 ready to treat with the influential men of all sections, 
 but determined not to surrender power to the Left,
 
 298 THE COALITION. 
 
 to pay full deference to the sentiments of the King, 
 and not to separate himself from the old party of 
 resistance, the only firm support of government. 
 M. Thiers was the essential soul, destined to be the 
 real chief in all these prospective cabinets ; but he 
 also had his reserves and conditions from which he 
 was disinclined to recede. It was his fundamental 
 notion to make the Left Centre, and also the moderate 
 portion of the Left, the rallying points of the old 
 party of resistance ; but he encountered in all tliese 
 groups, and in the Left Centre itself, rivalries, 
 jealousies, suspicions, and demands, impossible to 
 surmount. By rejecting my friends and myself they 
 had scattered the necessary and natural strength of 
 the government they wished to create from the 
 coalition; they endeavoured through the mediation 
 of the Duke de Broglie to redeem this error, as people 
 recal steps when they perceive the danger, without 
 a full conviction of the mistake. A -wish was ex- 
 pressed to include the Duke de Broglie and M. Du- 
 chatel in the new cabinet, leaving me and also M. 
 Thiers aside. This was met by a peremptory refusal. 
 A universal feeling existed that the proposed course 
 was incomplete and precarious, the responsibility of 
 which no one felt disposed to accept ; and every day 
 witnessed the renunciation and failure of the com- 
 bination which on the eve they were eager to nego- 
 tiate, and believed to be on the point of accom- 
 plishment. 
 
 The King looked on during this laborious confusion 
 as a highly interested spectator, indulging a slight
 
 THE COALITION. 299 
 
 cast of ridicule in his remarks, always too freely 
 communicated ; but without opposing any obstacles 
 to the various combinations attempted, or indicating 
 any refusal. On the 29th of March he desired M. 
 Thiers to form a cabinet himself, and accepted, as to 
 general policy, and particularly toAvards Spain, the 
 propositions which, eight days before, and through 
 the medium of Marshal Soult, M. Thiers had sub- 
 mitted to him. M. Thiers replied, " That he would 
 have undertaken the mission twelve days earlier, but 
 that now it was impossible, as the jDosition was 
 completely vitiated, and the combination which 
 promised success had been essayed in vain. A few 
 days later, the King said to one of the ministerial 
 candidates, " I am prepared for every thing ; I will 
 accept all ; I will submit to all ; but for the general 
 interest of which I am guardian, I am bound to 
 caution you that it is quite a different aifair to treat 
 the King as vanquished, or to propose palatable 
 conditions to him. You may force on me a ministry 
 to which I must submit, or may give me one to 
 which I can unite myself. In the first case, I shall 
 not oppose it secretly ; I shall never beti'ay my 
 cabinet, be it what it may ; but I warn you that 
 I shall not hold myself pledged to it, and that if any 
 incident places it in danger I shall do nothing to 
 prevent its fall. In the second case, I will support 
 it frankly." 
 
 In using this language the King exercised only 
 his constitutional prerogative ; and, in the estimation 
 of thinking and loyal men, he merited praise rather
 
 300 THE COALITION. 
 
 than censure. But in the opinion of the public, to 
 whom his words were more or less amplified, and 
 who distorted them in their turn, he would have 
 acted more prudently had he declared with less 
 openness his feeling and intention. 
 
 At the expiration of three weeks, thus consumed 
 in abortive efforts to construct a ministry, and which 
 had tended only to aggravate the difficulties, it was 
 felt to be absolutely necessary to take a step beyond 
 this position, so unsatisfactory and compromising to 
 all the authorities. It was pre-eminently essential 
 to the crown to show that the confusion produced 
 by such prolonged hesitation and delay in the govern- 
 ment of the country was not its act, and to throw 
 the responsibility on the Chamber of Deputies. It 
 was expected, moreover, that the Chamber being 
 called to resume its labours and practical debates on 
 public affairs, instead of wasting time in idle con- 
 versations in the hall of conferences, would clearly 
 demonstrate its ideas and wishes ; that a majority 
 would be declared, that the doubts of parties would 
 reach a termination, and that a cabinet would finally 
 be formed, affording a glimpse of that most likely to 
 be accepted and supported by the Parliament. Here 
 was another token of that general timidity, of the 
 absence of that provident and firm initiative I have 
 alluded to above, as one of the most embarrassing 
 weaknesses of our time. Neither the King nor the 
 leaders of the different parties and fractions of parties 
 were disposed to hazard of themselves a solution of 
 the question, as to when or how a majority could be
 
 THE COALITION. 301 
 
 formed in the Chamber capable of sustainiDg a min- 
 istry, and of pointing out its course by anticipation. 
 To organize the government, the Chamber was called 
 upon to understand and organize itself ; and to place 
 it in a position to reply, the King, on the 31st of 
 March, 1839, appointed provisional ministers, called 
 into office to resume the suspended duties of admin- 
 istration and of the Chambers, without having 
 themselves the slightest prospect of becoming a 
 definitive and permanent cabinet. This was merely 
 an expedient to satisfy appearances and current 
 aiFairs, while waiting a permanent solution ; and a 
 means of ascertaining the parliamentary majority so 
 much sought for and so completely concealed. With 
 a meritorious devotion to the service of their King 
 and country, seven honourable men, experienced in 
 administrative functions, and little mixed up with 
 political struggles, MM. de Gasparin, Girod de 
 I'Ain, Gautier, the Duke of Montebello, Eupinier, 
 Parant, and General Cubieres undertook this unam- 
 bitious mission. The provisional ministry commenced 
 their duties by proclaiming their own character, and 
 the active session immediately resumed its course. 
 
 The Chamber of Deputies in its first step was 
 called upon for an act which revealed its bias, and 
 the nature of its internal majority. It had to elect a 
 President. This choice necessarily divided it into two 
 parties, each proposing a candidate, and thus conso- 
 lidating the fragments into which it had been broken 
 up. Neither of the two principal sections, the Centre, 
 properly so named, and the Left, possessed a majority
 
 302 THE COALITION. 
 
 in itself, and Wcas therefore unable by its own strength 
 to return its candidate. It was in the floating group, 
 in the Left Centre, that the tAVO fixed divisions were 
 compelled mutually to seek the balance they required. 
 The Left Centre had been for some time the habitual 
 ally of the Left, and seemed disposed, in this new 
 trial, to continue its aid. But, on a closer view, my 
 friends and I concluded that the Left Centre was not 
 homogeneous, and that we also might possibly find 
 allies in its ranks. By the side of men undecided 
 through interest or pusillanimity, from malice or a 
 taste for intrigue, there were there, in fact, others 
 of distinguished character, conscientious in their 
 doubts, independent even to insanity, and to Avhom 
 neither the domination nor declared alliance of the 
 Left, nor perhaps even the empire of the eminent 
 leader of the Left Centre, M. Thiers, would afford 
 satisfaction. M. Passy and M. Sauzet, in particular, 
 appeared to us animated by these dispositions, and 
 inclined to exercise an act of liberty, in selecting 
 the President of the Chamber. We induced the 
 Centre, the old party of resistance, not without 
 difficulty, to adopt for their candidate M. Passy, 
 who allowed himself to be put in nomination. How 
 many voices from the Left Centre would join us to 
 carry his election ? . We knew not, but in any case 
 an important result was thus attained. The Chamber 
 bisected itself into two great divisions, and the old 
 party of government, from which the coalition had 
 for a moment estranged us, re-formed in mutual
 
 THE COALITION. 303 
 
 concert, with a good prospect of regaining the 
 majority it had so recently lost. 
 
 M. Thiers did not mistake the importance of this 
 attempt, and used his utmost efforts to retain the 
 Left Centre intact in its alliance with the Left, and to 
 enable these two sections to place M. Odilon-Barrot 
 in the presidential chair. Repairing one day to the 
 sitting, I met M. Thiers in the Tuileries, and we 
 walked together for some moments conversing freely 
 on this new position. " You have long profited," 
 I said to him, " by the hesitating dispositions of the 
 Left Centre ; it is now our turn ; we shall fight you 
 with your oAvn weapons; you will see that M. Passy 
 will be appointed. He did not believe in this result, 
 and persisted openly in supporting the canvass of M. 
 Odilon-Barrot. On the 6th of April, M. Passy was 
 elected President of the Chamber by 226 votes; 
 M. Barrot only obtained 193. 
 
 This was a step towards the re-organization of 
 the government party, and the formation of a solid 
 cabinet ; but this step was far from being promptly 
 decisive. The President being appointed, they began 
 to negotiate, to feel their way, to try the various 
 combinations already attempted, and other analogous 
 proceedings. Summonses were addressed to the 
 parties who had engaged in them ; in the tribune we 
 had long and animated explanations. Nothing re- 
 sulted; the same hesitations and incompatibilities 
 were everywhere encountered. For the moment, the 
 nomination of M. Passy to the Presidency had only
 
 304 THE COALITION. 
 
 increased the dismemberment of the Left Centre from 
 the other jDarties, and thrown into the Left a new 
 ferment of suspicion and ill-humour. The victorious 
 coalition appeared destined to end in a sterile and 
 impotent confusion. 
 
 On the 24th of April, the King wrote to say he 
 desired to see me.^ I repaired to the Tuileries. 
 After explaining his embarrassments, " which are also 
 yours," he said, "for the coalition has created them 
 for us, for you as well as for me," he asked if I 
 should object to some of my friends, naming M. 
 Duchatel and M. Dumon, joining a cabinet with 
 myself. "I have not the slightest objection, Sire, 
 provided the composition of the cabinet gives to the 
 policy I and my friends have supported, and intend 
 always to support, elFectual guarantees." "Be as- 
 sured," replied the King, " that I wish this as much 
 as you ; no one has less desire that the government 
 should be given over to the' Left; God knows where 
 the army Avould lead its leaders. But you see the 
 strait that we are in. It is only a ministry somcAvhat 
 neutral, a ministry in which great self-loves will not 
 be brought into collision that can extricate us from 
 it." — " Let this ministry be formed. Sire, let it re- 
 concile and unite the two Centres ; I shall not only 
 refrain from dissuading my friends to join it, but I 
 will support it with my utmost power." The King 
 took my hand with warm satisfaction, mingled with 
 a tinge of satire ; nothing suited him better than a 
 cabinet, which, while putting an end to his embar- 
 ' See Historic Documents, No. XIV.
 
 THE COALITION. 305 
 
 rassments, was, at the same time, an acknowledgment 
 of error by the coalition. 
 
 My friends met; under their remonstrances and 
 mine, M. Duchatel declared himself disposed, pro- 
 vided he was not left alone, to follow the path in- 
 dicated by the King. Nevertheless, uncertainty still 
 continued; various combinations were sought and 
 sounded for under every signification; an address 
 to the King was proposed in the Chamber to press for 
 a conclusion ; a committee was appointed to draw it 
 up. No one felt disposed to assume the responsi- 
 bility of a positive solution, for the success of any 
 solution appeared doubtful. In presence of this 
 parliamentary hesitation, revolutionary excitement 
 sprang up once more in Paris. Permanent conspi- 
 rators, clubs of secret societies, particularly the 
 society called at first of the Families^ and subse- 
 quently of the Seasons, met, communicated informa- 
 tion, lists of numbers, and hopes ; the rank and file 
 urged on the chiefs : could they ever expect a more 
 favourable opportunity? could they ever find them- 
 selves in presence of a more disturbed and undecided 
 power? A sudden resolution was taken. On the 22nd 
 of May, about three in the afternoon, a band of three 
 or four hundred men issued forth in Paris, shouting 
 Z,07ig live the Republic ! breaking open the armourers' 
 shops, firing in the streets, assailing the stations of 
 the national guards and regular troops, and direct- 
 ing their infuriated attempts against the Guildhall, 
 the Hall of Justice, and the Prefecture of Police. 
 By this headlong and unforeseen attack, a few posts 
 
 VOL. IV. X
 
 306 THE COALITION. 
 
 were carried ; officers, municipal guards, and national 
 guards were killed, some resisting the insurgents, 
 others endeavouring to parley with them. In a few 
 minutes several quarters of Paris became the theatre 
 of confused tumults and sanguinary encounters, and 
 without speaking of the slain, the number of which 
 was never ascertained, 143 wounded men, insurgents 
 or defenders of order, soldiers or civilians, were suc- 
 cessively carried to the different hospitals. Towards 
 five o'clock this frantic effort was completely stran- 
 gled, and the principal leaders were in the hands of 
 the magistrates. In the evening, a great number of 
 persons, peers, deputies, officers, public functionaries, 
 and partisans of the government or of the opposition, 
 presented themselves at the Tuileries ; Marshal Soult 
 had repaired thither on the first report of the out- 
 break, and I find, in notes taken by his son, the 
 Marquis of Dalmatia, at the very moment, these 
 plain phrases : "In the midst of this concourse of 
 people, the idea struck my father of profiting by it 
 to put an end to the general hesitation, and at last 
 to form a ministry. He obtained the King's consent. 
 As any of the persons arrived who were considered fit 
 for office, the King called them into the cabinet where 
 he was sitting with my father. M. Dufaure, who 
 happened accidentally to be one of the last, and who 
 had been sent for, was somewhat more tardy than 
 the rest in making up his mind ; but the weight of 
 impending circumstances prevailed over his doubts, 
 and before the evening closed, the revolutionary out- 
 break had effected what all the parliamentary agita-
 
 THE COALITION. 307 
 
 tion had vainly attempted for two months : the cabinet 
 of the 12th of May 1839 was formed." 
 
 This was precisely the ministry the King had hinted 
 at and desired. Marshal Soult, President, as minister 
 for Foreign Affairs; General Schneider and Admiral 
 Duperre in the departments of War and the Marine ; 
 three men from the Right Centre, MM. Duchatel, 
 Villemain, and Cunin Gridaine ; and three from the 
 Left Centre, MM. Passy, Dufaure, and Teste ; — these 
 divided political influence together. M. Odilon 
 Barrot, M. Thiers, and myself, were entirely excluded. 
 In the conflict of passions, pretensions, and hesita- 
 tions of the various parties and fractions of parties 
 into which the Chamber of Deputies was broken up, 
 such was the result of the coalition. 
 
 It was not to be expected that a cabinet thus 
 formed would openly adopt and practise the decided 
 and consistent policy we so anxiously desired. Sepa- 
 rated until now by ideas, position, and tendencies, 
 the new ministers had been draAvn together and united 
 under the pressure of a sudden necessity, to escape 
 from an urgent danger, without concert or under- 
 standing on the questions to be solved or the principles 
 of the government they undertook. Incoherent in 
 composition, the ministry could scarcely be other 
 than vacillating in conduct, at least as much so as that 
 of M. Mole had been. On this essential point, the 
 coalition, therefore, had not gained the end pro- 
 posed. In the common error, my friends enjoyed 
 only this advantage, that the Left looked upon the 
 formation of the new cabinet as a defeat, and instantly 
 
 X 2
 
 308 THE COALITION. 
 
 began to oppose it. M. Passy quitted the presiden- 
 tial chair of the Chamber ; it was necessary to replace 
 him. The ministry selected for their candidate M. 
 Sauzet ; the opposition chose M. Thiers. M. Sauzet 
 was elected by a majority of seven only, but after a 
 contest in which the two parties classified themselves 
 distinctly and measured their mutual strength. The 
 cabinet, although recruited from the Left Centre, 
 commenced operations, not by a concession to the 
 Left, as M. ]\IoM had done, but by a battle and victory 
 which satisfied and rallied at the outset the old party 
 of resistance. 
 
 The coalition scarcely succeeded better in another 
 of its patriotic expectations. The new ministry 
 contained, it is true, members of the Left Centre, as 
 also of the Right Centre ; several honourable and well- 
 esteemed men, until then divided, had now combined ; 
 but looking at the position in its entirety, it could 
 scarcely be said that the basis of the government 
 was enlarged, or that the crown had gathered to its 
 councils all the leading elements of the great party 
 sincerely anxious to establish constitutional monarchy. 
 The principal leaders, the most practised orators, 
 were not in office ; parliamentary government was 
 neither more complete nor more fortified and arrayed 
 in its full force than it had been under the adminis- 
 tration of M. Mold. 
 
 On one point alone, the capital point in truth, the 
 coalition had gained its object. The necessary in- 
 fluence of the Chamber of Deputies in the construc- 
 tion and composition of a ministry could no longer
 
 THE CO^VLITION. 309 
 
 be disputed or avoided. In spite of its internal dis- 
 sensions and weaknesses, that Chamber had made 
 manifest the extent to which, on questions of persons 
 and conduct, it could be depended on. Government 
 had remained for two months uncertain, and, as it 
 were, in suspense, until the Chamber had resumed its 
 fitting place and part. While defending his preroga- 
 tive, and notwithstanding his displeasure and desires, 
 sometimes too freely exhibited, the King had waited, 
 with judicious patience, until the Chamber had, so to 
 speak, disentangled itself, and indicated the combina- 
 tions and men capable of giving the crown autliori- 
 tative counsels and effective support. The country 
 had taken a decisive step in the path of free govern- 
 ment ; the parliamentary system was acknowledged 
 and accepted in its first and vital condition. 
 
 In this confused melange of opposite results, the 
 errors were more apparent than the success, and the 
 coalition felt neither satisfied with nor proud of its 
 victory. It had overthrown the cabinet it attacked, 
 but it had failed in forming the ministry it proposed. 
 It had brought to light the peremptory importance 
 of the Chamber of Deputies in government, but also 
 its inability to create a government of itself. The 
 coalescing parties had exhibited little political sagacity 
 and many petty passions. While submitting to a 
 check, the crown had inflicted a severe blow on its 
 conquerors. On my own personal account, at the 
 distance and in the repose from which I now con- 
 template that noisy incident, I incline to think that 
 I should have done more wisely to have taken no 
 
 X 3
 
 310 THE COALITION. 
 
 active part in it, and to have remained passive in my 
 tent, instead of issuing forth in arms to combat in a 
 listed field. After what had passed between M. Mole 
 and myself, neither my conviction nor my honour per- 
 mitted me to defend him ; but I was not called on to 
 assail, and might have marked my censure by silence. 
 He would have fallen nevertheless, and the govern- 
 ment party would then have rallied round me Avith 
 eagerness. On the contrary, it felt irritated at my 
 attacks, and by what was designated, on my part, a bad 
 example of opposition. It cost me much time and 
 manv trials before I could recover its confidence and 
 resume my place in its ranks. I foresaAV this evil, and 
 regretted my resolution while taking it. But we do 
 not easily disconnect ourselves from a long-cherished 
 and intimate idea. It was really a free government I 
 anxiously wished to found, and the acknowledged in- 
 fluence of the Chamber of Deputies was, in my eyes, 
 its most essential condition. In my enthusiasm to 
 obtain this end, I committed the error of not paying 
 sufficient regard to the general sentiment of my 
 political camp, and of consulting my individual feeling, 
 and the aspiration of my o^vn mind, rather than the 
 maintenance of my situation. A rare mistake in our 
 days, and which, to speak the truth, I can readily 
 forgive myself for, when I call it to remembrance.
 
 311 
 
 CHAPTER V. 
 
 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 
 
 SITUATION OF THE CABINET OF THE 12tH OF MAY 1839, ON ITS ACCES- 
 SION. MY OWN POSITION. HOW I EMPLOYED MY POLITICAL LEISURE. 
 
 I AM REQUESTED TO SUPERINTEND THE TRANSLATION AND PUBLICATION 
 IN FRANCE OF THE LETTERS AND WRITINGS OF WASHINGTON. 1 UNDER- 
 TAKE THE CHARGE. GREAT INTEREST WITH WHICH THIS WORK INSPIRES 
 
 ME. MY "HISTORICAL STUDY " ON THE LIFE AND CHARACTER OF WASH- 
 INGTON. ITS SUCCESS. TESTIMONIALS OF GRATITUDE RECEIVED FROM 
 
 THE AMERICANS. LETTER FROM KING LOUIS-PHILIPPE. REVIVAL OF 
 
 THE EASTERN QUESTION. WHY THAT NAME WAS GIVEN TO THE QUARREL 
 
 BETWEEN THE SULTAN AND THE PACHA OF EGYPT. GENERAL STATE OF 
 
 THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE. DISPOSITIONS AND POLICY OF THE GREAT 
 
 EUROPEAN POWERS. WAR BREAKS OUT BETWEEN MAHMOUD AND 
 
 MEHEMET ALL GOOD UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN FRANCE AND ENGLAND. 
 
 DEATH OF THE SULTAN MAHJIOUD. BATTLE OF NEZIB. DISAGREE- 
 MENT COMMENCES BETWEEN FRANCE AND ENGLAND ON THE TERRITORIAL 
 
 QUESTION BETWEEN THE SULTAN AND THE PACHA. VICISSITUDES OF 
 
 THE NEGOTIATIONS AT LONDON. ATTITUDE OF RUSSIA. SHE PLACES 
 
 HERSELF AT THE DISPOSAL OF ENGLAND. FRANCE PERSISTS IN HER 
 
 OPPOSITION, AND THE ENGLISH CABINET IN ITS RESOLUTIONS. GENERAL 
 
 SEBASTIANI. M. DE BRUNNOW IN LONDON. LORD PALMERSTON. THE 
 
 FRENCH CABINET OFFERS ME THE EMBASSY TO LONDON. 1 ACCEPT IT. 
 
 MY REASONS. KING LOUIS-PHILIPPE EVINCES OPPOSITION. HIS 
 
 MOTIVES. THE CABINET INSISTS. THE KING YIELDS. MY APPOINT- 
 MENT. THE CHAMBER OF DEPUTIES REFUSES THE DOTATION PROPOSED 
 
 FOR THE DUKE OF NEMOURS. UNCERTAIN POSITION OF THE CABINET. 
 
 I LEAVE PARIS FOR LONDON. 
 
 {From 12th May 1839, to 2Wi Feb. 1840.) 
 
 The formation of the cabinet of the 12th of May- 
 produced in the Chambers and in Paris a feeling of 
 satisfaction more general than warm. A term was 
 
 X 4
 
 312 THE EASTERN (JUESTION. 
 
 thus given to the longest ministerial crisis that had 
 yet been kno^\^l. Not that the solution appeared 
 permanently secured, but at last there was a ministry ; 
 public uneasiness was put an end to, and even those 
 who were not satisfied were glad to be relieved from 
 their hesitations and embarrassments. 
 
 The cabinet also had within itself, and on its o-\vn 
 account, causes for satisfaction and confidence. Its 
 members could not be taxed with intrigue and ambi- 
 tion : the urgency of the public interest and peril had 
 alone decided them. In accepting office they performed 
 an act of devotion and courage. They were well dis- 
 posed and in friendly relations towards each other, 
 although, until then, they had marched in different 
 ranks. M. Duchatel and M. Villemain on the one 
 side, M. Dufaure and M. Passy on the other, mutually 
 recognized themselves as men of worth and honour, 
 enlightened and moderate in their views, and capable 
 of combining loyally in the management of public 
 affairs. They had common ties of reason and 
 integrity, divested of all troublesome rivalship. The 
 Chambers appeared to be satisfied with their ap- 
 pointment, and received them with an expression of 
 good-will which called for care to preserve rather 
 than for efforts to conquer a majority. 
 
 For my own part, I determined to support the 
 cabinet firmly. I had confidence in the friends who 
 there represented my opinions; I felt neither ill- 
 humour nor impatience ; in the Chambers I was 
 commended for having laid aside all personal con- 
 siderations ; the King felt obliged to me for having
 
 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 313 
 
 aided him to emerge from the crisis. From the com- 
 plicated and militant attitude in which the coalition 
 had entangled me, I subsided into a clear and cahn 
 position : it suited me for the present, and left me 
 unfettered for the future. 
 
 An unexpected incident filled up the leisure 
 and revived the animation of suspended politics. 
 The founder, both by the sword and by law, of the 
 RexDublic of the United States of America, — Wash- 
 ington, — had left, at his death, two hundred volumes 
 in folio, including his entire correspondence, the 
 letters he had received, as well as those he had 
 written, during the course of his public life. The 
 Congress of the United States purchased these 
 precious documents from his heirs, and lodged them 
 in the archives of the nation. A skilful editor, Mr. 
 Jared Sparks, already known by important historical 
 labours, — amongst others, by the publication of the 
 " Diplomatic Correspondence of the United States 
 during the War of Independence," — examined, classi- 
 fied, and arranged in order this great collection. He did 
 more ; he traversed Europe and America ; the public 
 depositories and private collections of France and 
 England were freely opened to him ; he sought out 
 and collected every document tending to complete 
 the authentic biography of a great man, which forms, 
 in fact, the history of the cradle of a great people ; 
 and, as the fruit of this patriotic undertaking, a com- 
 plete and beautiful edition of the "Writings and Let- 
 ters of Washington" appeared at Boston between 1834 
 and 1837. As soon as it was completed, in 1838, the
 
 314 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 
 
 American editors, anxious that Washington should 
 be as well kno^vn in France as in his own country, 
 entreated me to select, from this vast series, such 
 letters and documents as might appear to me specially- 
 calculated to interest French readers, and to super- 
 intend the translation and publication. I most wil- 
 lingly undertook the task. 
 
 At that time I had not particularly or deeply 
 studied the foundation of the American Republic. I 
 Avas occupied with constitutional monarchy, and the 
 more I have advanced in the experience of govern- 
 ment, the more I feel convinced that it is the only 
 form suited to France; but I have always felt, and 
 still cherish, an ardent sympathy for the great nation 
 which has formed itself in Northern America, and 
 for the great political trial it braved. It is now a 
 mere hackneyed phrase to say that we should lay 
 more stress on the practical results of governments 
 than on their names and forms. I suspect this 
 common-place expression is more frequently repeated 
 than well understood or adopted. In spite of so 
 many unfortunate experiments, the name and form 
 of the Republic maintain in our days a dangerous 
 power, for they still comprise the dream of many 
 ardent and generous spirits, — a dream to which our 
 existing habits and new social position often lend the 
 appearance of a possible and approaching reality. 
 There are, moreover, between some of the principles 
 of constitutional monarchy and those of a republic, 
 affinities which seem to render natural the passage 
 from one to the other, and maintain, for republican
 
 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 315 
 
 hopes and tendencies, a strength which their repeated 
 checks would otherwise seem to have taken from 
 them. A serious investigation of the originating 
 causes and first steps of the great American demo- 
 cracy, has therefore, for us, as much importance as 
 attraction. In no other inquiry on the nature of 
 government can we better learn to penetrate beyond 
 appearances, to estimate the end rather than the 
 outward form, and to recognize what are, in all 
 cases, the true characteristic and imperious condi- 
 tions of liberty. 
 
 Besides the event itself, another fact in the 
 foundation of the United States of America power- 
 fully attracted and interested me, — the individual 
 who had directed the movement in war and in peace, 
 Washington: — a great man by compulsion, as we 
 may say, and against his own choice, who found 
 himself equal to all situations and tasks, without 
 seeking or desiring any ; who felt no natural or 
 ardent necessity to undertake the great deeds he was 
 capable of and has accomplished; and who might 
 have lived on, a small proprietor, agriculturist, and 
 unambitious hunter, had not necessity and duty 
 transformed him into the general of an army and 
 the founder of a nation. 
 
 As I more closely studied the event and the man, 
 I became the more attracted and enlightened, as well 
 in the convictions of my public life as in my solitary 
 thoughts. I passed and repassed incessantly from 
 France to America, from America to France. I saw 
 before me two social conditions, profoundly different :
 
 316 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 
 
 the one old and catholic, free in spirit, without pub- 
 lic liberty, overflowing with monarchical traditions, 
 aristocratic remembrances, and democratic passions, 
 mixed up throughout all history with the affairs of 
 Europe and of the world; the other, new and protes- 
 tant, trained to republican habits, although faithful to 
 the legal and respectful manners of the mother- 
 country, without rivals or neighbours, isolated in 
 space, careless of the past and boldly confident in the 
 future. These two societies had recently accomplished 
 two revolutions as opposite in character as themselves, 
 — America a revolution of national independence, 
 France a revolution of social re-casting ; and to both 
 succeeded the labour of the formation of two govern- 
 ments equally distinct from each other, the one re- 
 publican and federative, the other monarchical and 
 unitarian, but both inspired by the same wish and 
 tending to the same end, — political liberty. For a 
 man called to take part in this difficult object of the 
 France of 1789, the establishment of the United 
 States in 1776 presented a grand spectacle for con- 
 templation and a productive source of instruction. 
 
 When, in the progress of the American event, I 
 closely examined the man who had directed it, the sub- 
 ject became much more striking, and the information 
 more clear. 1 beheld Washington possessed from his 
 first movements by a judicious and virtuous apprehen- 
 sion, — the dread of popular and anarchical violence. 
 He had, amongst the earliest, accepted and proclaimed 
 the dangerous enterprise of the American revolution ;
 
 THE EASTERN QUESTION. ' 317 
 
 for nine years he had sustained it to ultimate triumph, 
 by war. As soon as he applied his hand to govern- 
 ment, he devoted himself to a policy of resistance 
 and peace, — the only course which, in his eyes, could 
 establish national independence and liberty in his 
 country. 
 
 Two features predominate in the character of 
 Washington : a profound attachment to the cause he 
 had adopted, and a firm independence of judgment 
 and conduct in the service of his country. He was 
 a genuine Anglo-American planter, strongly imbued 
 with English traditions and American manners, sym- 
 pathizing perfectly with the general sentiment and 
 desire of his fellow-countrymen, but whose mind, 
 imperturbably sound, rejected all public passions, pre- 
 judices, and caprices, judging them with equal free- 
 dom and calmness whenever they presented them- 
 selves before him; never quarrelling with them 
 abruptly, but ever resolved to resist when they com- 
 promised the policy which, in his strong conviction, 
 the public interest called on him to maintain. While 
 possessing the instinct and natural gift of authority, 
 he was eminently prudent and scrupulous in the 
 exercise of government : full of respect for men in 
 general, and for the common rights of all, but with- 
 out any democratic bias, and dignified in manner, on 
 all occasions, almost to severity. An admirable com- 
 pound of lofty intelligence and tempered judgment, 
 as of pride without ambition, which commanded, at 
 the same time, respect and confidence, and raised
 
 318 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 
 
 him to the undisputed leadership of a people who 
 saw in him their most disinterested, their safest, 
 ablest, and worthiest servant. 
 
 I took continually increasing pleasure in the con- 
 templation of this noble portrait, less varied in its 
 lineaments, less brilliant and warm than that of other 
 great men in the same rank, but marvellously serene, 
 harmonious, pure from egotism, powerful in wisdom 
 and virtue, and perfectly adapted to his country, his 
 time, and his mission. The " Historical Study " 
 which I dedicated to the life and character of AVash- 
 ington, obtained, in America as in Europe, a success 
 which gratified me sincerely on my own account, and 
 as a symptom of the general state of minds. In our 
 epoch of transformation and transition we are at- 
 tainted by many social and moral diseases ; there are 
 many follies in our heads, many evil passions and 
 weaknesses in our hearts. But the pure springs 
 are not all dried up : honest impulses are not entirely 
 extinct ; and when men witness the appearance, in a 
 brilliant personification, of health of mind and soul, 
 they bow down with respect, and voluntarily adopt 
 it for counsellor and guide. Washington is not 
 alone a grand political model ; he is also an encoura- 
 ging example ; for, through all the obstacles, dangers, 
 misfortunes, and mistakes inseparable from any great 
 human enterprise, he triumphed beyond his expecta- 
 tion, and even during his life obtained as much suc- 
 cess for his cause as glory for his name. 
 
 I do not hesitate to introduce here two evidences 
 of the effect produced by this historical portrait of
 
 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 319 
 
 Washington, and of its appreciation by the most com- 
 petent judges. Shortly after the work had been 
 translated and published in the United States, the 
 follo\ving letter was addi^essed to me by twenty-five 
 Americans of distinction : — 
 
 " Sir, 
 
 " The undersigned, citizens of the United 
 States of America, sojourners in Paris, being deeply 
 impressed with the friendly spirit and general ex- 
 cellence of the Introduction to your valuable edition 
 of the 'Life and Writings of Washmgton,' have 
 united for the purpose of soliciting you to sit for 
 your picture to an American artist who has earned 
 a high reputation in his profession. Our ulterior 
 purpose is to transmit the portrait to the speakers 
 of our Congress, and to request for it a place in the 
 library of that body, as a permanent memorial of the 
 profound respect we entertain for your personal cha- 
 racter and intellectual trophies, and, in joarticular, 
 of the gratitude which all Americans should feel for 
 your liberal agency in exhibiting anew to Europe 
 the true nature of their revolution, and the distinctive 
 pre-eminence of its hero." ^ 
 
 This double intention was accomplished. Mr. 
 Healy, a clever American artist, painted my portrait, 
 which was placed at Washington in the library of 
 the Hall of Congress, and I received from him as a 
 present the portrait of Washington, with that of 
 
 * See Historic Documents, No. XV.
 
 320 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 
 
 Hamilton, undoubtedly the most eminent, in cha- 
 racter and power of thought, of the political associates 
 of the founder of the American Republic, and who, 
 in Europe at least, has not attained, in that great 
 history, his due position. 
 
 It was at Val-Richer, far from the noise of the 
 world and of state complications, that I wrote this 
 " Historical Study." I presented a copy to King 
 Louis-Philippe, who, during his residence in the 
 United States, had been personally acquainted with 
 Washington, of whom he had related to me some 
 remarkable anecdotes. On my return to Paris I 
 received the foUo^dng letter, dated the 26th of De- 
 cember 1839: — 
 
 " My dear late Minister, 
 
 " If I have so long delayed my reply, it is 
 because I wished to thank you myself for your work 
 on Washington, and to tell you how much I should 
 be gratified if I could command time to read and 
 talk over it with you. You know too well how com- 
 pletely I am deprived of these tranquil relaxations. 
 Nevertheless I shall endeavour, at least, to read the 
 Introduction, which I hear spoken of as a master- 
 piece. My three years' residence in America pro- 
 duced an important hifluence on my political opi- 
 nions and judgment on the march of human events. 
 The puritanic and democratic revolution, vanquished 
 in England, and driven for refuge to the little 
 States of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Con- 
 necticut, overflowed and subdued all the other ele-
 
 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 321 
 
 ments of population in the vast continent on which 
 the European tempest had impelled it. For, although 
 the Dutch at New York, the English catholics under 
 Lord Baltimore at Baltimore (1632), and, earlier 
 than either, the French (under Henry IV.), had 
 attemj)ted this great colonization, all were extin- 
 guished under the puritanic democracy, and the frag- 
 ments of the Long Parliament and its army. But 
 Washington was neither puritan nor aristocrat ; still 
 less was he a democrat. He was essentially a man 
 of order and government, seeking ever to combine 
 and use to the best advantage the often discordant and 
 always weak elements with which he had to combat, 
 and to rescue his country from anarchy. I feel con- 
 vinced that you have drawn him thus, and my con- 
 fidence on this point adds much to my regret at not 
 having time to read your Washington ; but it always 
 gives me pleasure to repeat the assurance of my sen- 
 timents towards you." 
 
 While applying myself to this labour, delighted 
 at finding between the policy of Washington in the 
 dawning government of the United States, and that 
 which my friends and I had maintained since 1830, 
 an evident analogy, new perspectives opened them- 
 selves before me. France ceased to be violently dis- 
 turbed in the interior. Public order and the security 
 of the constitutional monarchy seemed to be no longer 
 menaced. Our foreign affairs became the principal 
 occupation of minds and the prevailing interest of the 
 moment. I was on the point of being called upon to 
 
 VOL. IV. Y
 
 322 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 
 
 take an active part. The Eastern question sprang up 
 again, more complicated and urgent than before. 
 
 I say the Eastern question^ for this was in fact the 
 name given by all the world to the quarrel between 
 the Sultan Mahmoud, and his subject the Pacha of 
 Egypt, Mehemet Ali. Why was this sounding title 
 applied to a local contest ? Egypt is not the whole 
 Ottoman empire. The Ottoman empire is not the 
 entire East. The rebellion, even the dismemberment 
 of a province, cannot comprise the fate of a, sove- 
 reignty. The great states of Western Europe have 
 alternately lost or acquired, either by internal dis- 
 sension or war, considerable territories ; yet under the 
 aspect of these circumstances no one has spoken of 
 the Western question. Why then has a term never 
 used in the territorial crises of Christian Europe, 
 been considered and admitted to be perfectly natural 
 and legitimate when the Ottoman empire is in argu- 
 ment ? 
 
 It is that there is at present in the Ottoman em- 
 pire no local or partial question. If a shock is felt 
 in a corner of the edifice, if a single stone is de- 
 tached, the entire building appears to be, and is in 
 fact, ready to fall. Opinions may differ as to the 
 degree of strength and probable life still remaining 
 to this great invalid; but no one seriously believes in 
 his cure. His death, more or less imminent, more or 
 less natural, is a fact which governs the entire po- 
 sition, a presentiment which agitates all Europe. The 
 Egyptian question was in 1839 the question of the 
 Ottoman empire itself. And the question of the
 
 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 323 
 
 Ottoman empire is in reality the Eastern question, 
 not only of the European but of the Asiatic East ; for 
 Asia is now the theatre of the leading ambitions and 
 rivalries of the great powers of Europe; and the 
 Ottoman empire is the highway, the gate, and the 
 key of Asia. In that quarter lies for the European 
 and Christian world an immense future, already vi- 
 sible and perhaps impending. 
 
 Nothing can be more simple than that, at the pro- 
 spect of such a future, political philosophers and spe- 
 culative theorists should excite themselves; that 
 they should give way to all the freedom of their 
 thoughts, that they should imagine twenty solutions 
 of the great problem laid before them. All these 
 inventions, more or less brilliant and specious, we have 
 seen displayed; some have proposed the resurrection 
 of the Ottoman empire; others have suggested its 
 decease, violently precipitated with such and such a 
 partition of the spoils; others again, the foundation 
 in its place of a great Arabian sovereignty ; and there 
 have not been wanting those who proposed the erec- 
 tion of a new Christian empire at Constantinople. 
 These are all freaks of fancy or illusive meditation, 
 diplomatic or warlike utopianisms. Let practical and 
 serious politicians deride them ; this also is perfectly 
 natural. When we undertake to direct affairs, when 
 we assume the responsibility of events, we weigh the 
 collective difficulties of a problem, and estimate the 
 full variety of solutions so cavalierly offered. But if 
 serious politicians have a right to smile at chimeras, 
 they are not privileged to disown or forget facts. 
 
 T 2
 
 324 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 
 
 Now, I do not hesitate to affirm that the mcurable 
 illness and inevitable death of the Ottoman empire 
 are certain facts, the definitive explosion of which 
 may be more or less at hand; but from this hour 
 every rational politician, whether it pleases him or 
 not, is bound to look upon the issue with the deepest 
 interest. 
 
 I have already stated what, in the presence of these 
 facts, was the resf)ective attitude of the great Euro- 
 pean powers. Two amongst them, England and 
 Austria, seemed to overlook the future entirely, and 
 to be anxious only to maintain and defend the Otto- 
 man empire in its actually existing state. Russia, 
 on the contrary, followed step by step its progressive 
 decline, and was preparing to profit by its fall, with- 
 out exciting, by accelerating or anticipating the 
 catastrophe, the premeditated resistance of Europe. 
 Prussia lent herself with indifferent curiosity and 
 alternating complaisance to the conservative or de- 
 stroying efforts of Russia, Austria, and England. I 
 was appealed to on the 2nd of July 1839, in the 
 Chamber of Deputies, to characterize mth precision 
 the policy which France ought to adopt in these cir- 
 cumstances. I shall repeat here my words of that 
 epoch, for they still convey the true expression of 
 my thought: "We have no occasion," I said, "to 
 search far for the policy suitable to France ; we find 
 it long since established. It is a traditional, secular 
 policy, it is our national policy. It consists in the 
 maintenance of the European equilibrium by the main- 
 tenance of the Ottoman empire, according to the po-
 
 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 325 
 
 sition of the times and within the limits of the pos- 
 sible, those two laws for the government of states. 
 
 " If I sought for illustrative names, I should en- 
 counter those of Henry IV., Richelieu, Louis XIV,, 
 and Napoleon ; they all practised this policy and no 
 other. 
 
 " What did the orators of yesterday say to you? 
 That this is in fact the best policy, and, if still available, 
 should be still followed. They have merely denied 
 or called in question its possibility, and then each 
 produced his own system in place of that which he 
 declared impracticable. 
 
 " This, then, is the true question : Is the national 
 and historical policy of France, the maintenance of the 
 European equilibrium by the maintenance of the 
 Ottoman empire, still practicable? 
 
 " The answer depends on two things ; — the state of 
 the Ottoman empire itself, and the state of the great 
 European powers. 
 
 "As to the Ottoman empire, I am far from con- 
 testing its declme ; the fact is evident. Nevertheless, 
 Gentlemen, take care ; be not too rapid in your fore- 
 sight. Empires which have lasted long are extremely 
 slow m fallmg ; the catastrophe is long foreseen and 
 expected before it happens. Providence, which par- 
 ticipates not in the impatient precipitations of the 
 human mmd, seems to take pleasure in falsifying the 
 predictions of which the Ottoman empire is at pre- 
 sent the object. It has given this contradiction on 
 the same soil, withui the same walls, by perpetuating 
 there another empire, the Greek empire, not for 
 
 T 3
 
 326 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 
 
 years but for ages, after the most intelligent spirits 
 of the time had prophesied its ruin. 
 
 " I might confine myself to this general answer, and 
 the contradiction would probably suffice. But let 
 us go more deeply into facts ; let us examine more 
 closely how the decline of the Ottoman empire has 
 operated for the last fifty years, with the circum- 
 stances which have accompanied and still accompany 
 it down to our own days. 
 
 " That empire has lost much ; it has lost provmces 
 equal to kingdoms. How has it lost them? Not by 
 conquest, for a long time; many years have elapsed 
 since any European power took any possession by 
 war or open force from the Ottoman empii*e. The 
 Crimea is the last dependency thus snatched away; 
 for I speak not of the regency of Algiers, which had 
 become almost entirely estranged. 
 
 "What then has happened? How has the Otto- 
 man empire nearly lost the Danubian Prmcij)alities, 
 Greece entirely, and Egypt more than half ? Here 
 are stones, allow me the expression, which have fallen 
 naturally from the building. I readily accord that 
 foreign intrigues and ambition have had some 
 share in producing these events ; but they have not 
 created them ; they would not even have carried them 
 to an end. They arise from natural, spontaneous dis- 
 memberment. These provinces, by their own action 
 and internal movement, have detached themselves 
 from the Ottoman empire, which had no power to 
   retain them. 
 
 "And once detached, what has become of them?
 
 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 327 
 
 Have they fallen into the hands of any given Euro- 
 pean power ? Not yet ; they have laboured to make 
 themselves independent states, to stand alone, under 
 specific protectorship more or less pressing, more or 
 less dangerous, but which has left and still leaves 
 them the title of distinct peoples, of new sovereignties 
 in the great family of nations. 
 
 " And do you believe, Gentlemen, that without this 
 perspective, without the hope of seeing these frag- 
 ments of the Ottoman empire transform themselves 
 thus into new states ; — do you believe that we should 
 take such a lively interest, such an active part, in 
 what has passed in the East, — in the fate of Greece, 
 for example? No, certainly not. If the question 
 had been to detach fi^om the Ottoman empire a par- 
 ticular province to bestow it on some other power, 
 assuredly you would not have witnessed amongst us 
 the national impulse which hastened to the rescue of 
 Greece and saved her. 
 
 " What I say of Greece I shall say also of Egypt : 
 in spite of evident distinctions, here is an analogous 
 fact. It is not we who have so nearly severed Egypt 
 from the Ottoman empire. Undoubtedly, by our 
 expedition of 1798, by the examples and triumphs 
 of the French army and its glorious chief, we reckon 
 for something in the apparition of this new power. 
 It has not, however, proceeded from our act; it also 
 is a natural dismemberment of the Ottoman empire, 
 attempted and nearly accomplished by the genius 
 and controlling will of a smgle man. Mehemet Ali 
 has made Egypt what it is by taking possession of 
 
 Y 4
 
 328 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 
 
 the movement imparted from us. We protected tliis 
 new state from its origin, and still more recently, in 
 1833, as under the Restoration we had protected the 
 dawn of Greece, and for the same reasons. We beheld 
 in Egypt a natural dislocation of the Ottoman em- 
 pire, and perhaps a rising j^ower destined at some 
 future day to become independent and to play its 
 part in the affairs of the world. Consider well. 
 Gentlemen, what has passed durmg the last thirty 
 years in the East, and in all the dominions under the 
 Ottoman rule. You will recognize every^vhere the 
 same fact. You will see that empire naturally dis- 
 member itself on certain f)oints, not for the advantage 
 of any specific power amongst the great states of 
 Europe, but to commence, to attempt at least, the 
 formation of some new and mdependent sovereignty. 
 No one, in Europe, would have consented that con- 
 quest should bestow such acquisitions on any of the 
 old kingdoms. This is the true cause of the course 
 wliich the progressive disorganization of the Ottoman 
 empire has taken, and it is to these conditions and 
 within these limits that France has given her accord. 
 To maintain the Ottoman empire for the equilibrium 
 of Europe, and when by the force of events, by the 
 natural progress of facts, some dismemberment takes 
 place, some province detaches itself from that de- 
 clining power, to favour the transformation of that 
 province into a new and independent sovereignty 
 which may take its place in the family of nations, 
 and assist at a future day in the new Euroj)ean equi- 
 librium, destmed to replace that whose elements will
 
 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 329 
 
 exist no longer : — such is the policy suitable to 
 France; to this she has been naturally led, and in 
 this, accordmg to my opinion, she will do well to 
 persevere." 
 
 Such were the dispositions of the great European 
 cabinets when they learned, towards the middle of 
 May 1839, that the arrangement concluded on the 
 5th of May 1833, at Kutaieh, between the Sultan 
 Mahmoud and Mehemet Ali, was broken ; that the 
 Turkish army had passed the Euj)hrates on the 21st 
 of April to attack that of the Pacha, commanded by 
 his son Ibrahun ; and that thus the Eastern question 
 was revived with all its chances and embarrassments. 
 
 In a first impulse of displeasure and equity, it was 
 asked who was the aggressor ? Even the English 
 cabinet, despite its disposition to side with the Sultan, 
 appeared anxious on this point. " The actual event," 
 said Lord Palmerston to Baron de Bourqueney, at 
 that time charge d'affaires in London, " surprises us : 
 the fact of aggression, attributed by the new telegraph 
 to the Turks, has its moral importance, for there is 
 a principle of justice, the power of which we cannot 
 deny, in a first disposition to throw back the con- 
 sequences of war on the aggressor." ^ It was soon 
 established beyond doubt that the aggressive move- 
 ment came from Constantinople. For several months 
 everything in that city presaged and announced pre- 
 parations for war. On the 16th of May Admiral 
 Roussm wrote as follows to Marshal Soult: — "Emis- 
 saries arrive daily from Egypt and Syi^ia, secretly 
 
 1 See Historic Documents, No. XVI.
 
 330 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 
 
 despatched by the Sultan; they rej)ort to him that 
 all the populations are ready to rise against Mehemet 
 Ali at the first signal. Tahar Pacha, despatched two 
 months ago to the camp of Hafiz Pacha, was ostensibly 
 charged to order him to remain within the frontier ; 
 but he had private instructions from the Sultan ; they 
 are not positively avowed, but surmised. The Sultan 
 is determined to destroy his vassal or to perish; he 
 declares this openly. It is not known or believed 
 that the army has passed the frontier ; but it is sup- 
 posed to be so near that point as to render the attack of 
 the Egyptians inevitable, and this the Sultan ardently 
 desires." The Consul-General of England at Alex- 
 andria, Colonel Campbell, wrote thus to Lord Palmer- 
 ston on the 28th of May : " The passionate violence 
 of the Sultan, who is acting contrary to the advice 
 of the ambassadors at Constantinople, will not only 
 exhaust his resources, but will materially weaken his 
 moral influence in Turkey; while the moderate and 
 prudent conduct of Ibrahim Pacha, — ^who, m obedience 
 to the orders of his father, has abstained from every 
 act of hostility, — will elevate Mehemet Ali, and in- 
 crease his power over men's minds throughout the 
 Ottoman empire." Finally, the English ambassador 
 at Constantinople, Lord Ponsonby, so prejudiced 
 against Mehemet Ali and always ready to condemn 
 him, had wi'itten on the 20th of May to Lord Palmer- 
 ston in these words : " The Sultan has declared that 
 he would die rather than not destroy his rebellious 
 vassal;" and again, on the 22nd: "I am convinced 
 that the Sublime Porte has definitively resolved to
 
 THE EASTEEN QUESTION. 331 
 
 make war upon the Pacha of Egypt. It does not 
 appear that hostilities have yet commenced." ^ 
 
 How could Mahmoud have restrained his passion? 
 Lord Ponsonby himself urged him to gratify it. 
 When the aggressive intentions of the Porte became 
 evident, Admiral Roussin addressed the Sultan with 
 anunated remonstrances; Lord Ponsonby refused to 
 second them. " This refusal is much to be lamented," 
 wrote Marshal Soult, on the 6th of July, to M. de 
 Bourqueney ; " the silence alone of the English am- 
 bassador, in such a conjuncture, is a positive encou- 
 ragement to the rash projects of the Porte." M. de 
 Bourqueney was instructed to communicate on this 
 subject with Lord Palmerston. " I am. not charged," 
 he said, " with any official complamt ; some strange 
 facts have taken place ; I am directed to place before 
 you the documents which verify them, and to await 
 the explanations which you may consider due to the 
 mutual confidence of our two cabinets." " Lord Pal- 
 merston rang the bell," continues M. de Bourqueney; 
 " he ordered the last four months of the correspon- 
 dence of Lord Ponsonby to be brought to him, and 
 also the last two years of that of Colonel Campbell. 
 ' Let us speak of Lord Ponsonby first,' said he to me; 
 ' I will prove to you that my instructions have never 
 varied on this fundamental j)oint, that the English 
 ambassador should do his utmost to restrain the war- 
 like propensities of the Sultan; we have constantly 
 repeated to Lord Ponsonby, " Prevent war from 
 
 1 See CoiTespondence relative to the Affaii'S of the Levant, 
 Parti, pp. 28, 56, 106, 153.
 
 332 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 
 
 breaking out." ' Lord Palmerston then made me 
 read seven or eight despatches written by him to 
 Lord Ponsonby between the end of January and the 
 middle of June, and all founded on this general 
 datum. ' Now,' he continued, ' I cannot conceal from 
 you that the personal opinion of Lord Ponsonby — an 
 opinion in which I do not at all participate — has ever 
 been opposed to the maintenance of the status quo of 
 Kutaieh; he even preferred extreme measures, as 
 susceptible at least of a favourable issue ; but I have 
 good reason to believe that, in his official relations at 
 Constantinople, the ambassador has subordmated his 
 personal convictions to his instructions : this at least 
 I am bound to infer from his correspondence.' And 
 Lord Palmerston then read to me, at hazard, all the 
 last despatches of Lord Ponsonby, in e\adence of his 
 pacific efforts with the Sultan. I observed to Lord 
 Palmerston that it seemed to me very difficult to 
 reject the impression that the personal opinions of the 
 ambassador, readily penetrated on the spot, and trans- 
 parent even in the despatches I had just read, must 
 have detracted in some degree from the efficacy of his 
 peaceful action at Constantinople. Lord Palmerston, 
 Tvithout directly concurrmg in the same sentiment, 
 replied in such a manner as to convmce me that he 
 entertained similar apprehensions. Li any i)ther 
 country the result of this conversation would have 
 been the probable recall of Lord Ponsonby. Here 
 matters are differently arranged. Foreign affairs are 
 regulated by internal influences." ' 
 
 ' The Baron de Bourqueney to Marshal Soult, July 9th, 1839.
 
 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 333 
 
 The question as to whether the Sultan or the Pacha 
 had recommenced the war soon disappeared before 
 the unportance of the event, and the uneasiness it 
 inspired. The feeling was simultaneous in Paris and 
 London ; both cabinets had the same desire to arrest 
 the struggle in the East, and to prevent Russia from 
 taking advantage of it to increase her predominance 
 at Constantinople. Marshal Soult immediately de- 
 spatched two of his aides-de-camp, one to Constan- 
 tinople, the other to Alexandria, to demand the im- 
 mediate suspension of hostilities, and to convey 
 themselves the respective orders to the Turkish and 
 Egyptian armies. A credit of ten millions was 
 called for in the Chambers, to give our naval arma- 
 ments the necessary development. Baron de Bour- 
 queney received orders to communicate to the English 
 cabinet all the information that reached Paris, all the 
 ideas that sprang up, and all the measures that were 
 preparing in consequence of the new position, and to 
 establish between the two governments the most 
 frank and intimate co-operation. " In thus exposing 
 to the cabinet of London our full and comprehensive 
 view of the important circumstances of the moment," 
 the Duke of Dalmatia wrote, " we tender to it an 
 unequivocal pledge of our confidence, and of our 
 desire to act reciprocally in the most perfect accord- 
 ance." ^ 
 
 The English cabinet received these overtures with 
 satisfaction unhesitatingly declared. " We under- 
 stand each other on all points," said Lord Palmerston 
 
 1 Marshal Soult to Baron de Bourqueney, June 17th, 1839.
 
 334 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 
 
 to Baron de Bourqueney, after reading Marshal 
 Soult's despatch ; " our agreement will be complete. 
 Pi-inciple, end, means of execution, all are full of 
 reason, simplicity, and foresight. This is not the 
 communication of one government to another; call it 
 rather a bond between colleagues, between members 
 .. of the same cabinet." When practical measures came 
 to be considered, the understanding proved to be 
 prompt and effective. The respective strength of the 
 French and English fleets was settled without the 
 slightest difficulty, as also were the instructions to 
 the two admirals to act in concert for the prevention 
 of hostilities. In order to combine the five gi'cat 
 powers in one conamon action, and to profit by the 
 influence of Austria at Constantinople, Marshal Soult 
 proposed Vienna for the seat of general deliberation. 
 Lord Palmerston at first suggested some doubts as 
 to this arrangement. He feared, he said, that the in- 
 fluence of Russia might exercise itself more effec- 
 tually on Prince Metternich in Vienna, than on Count 
 Appony in Paris, or on Prince Esterhazy in London; 
 but he soon conceded the point. " I have uttered 
 my thoughts quite openly before you," he said to M. 
 de Bourqueney. " I see the for and against, and, 
 taking all together, I think the for will cany it ; but 
 I must consult the cabinet ; I will let you know its 
 decision ; " and the decision of the English cabinet 
 was favourable to the Marshal's' proposition. It was 
 agreed that some Austrian men-of-war should join 
 the French and English fleets in the Mediterranean. 
 There was also full concert on the idea and terms of
 
 THE EASTEEN QUESTION. 335 
 
 a solemn declaration, by which the powers pledged 
 themselves to maintain the integrity of the Ottoman 
 empire, and to accept no portion of its territory. A 
 more difficult question presented itself. What was 
 to be done, if in virtue of the treaty of Unkiar- 
 Skelessi, and on a demand from the Porte, Russian 
 ships and troops should arrive suddenly at Constan- 
 tinople to protect the Sultan against the Pacha ? The 
 French cabinet had expressed some anxiety to M. de 
 Bourqueney, as to the dispositions of the English 
 ministry under this hypothesis. The Duke of 
 Montebello, at that time provisional minister for 
 Foreign Affiiirs, wrote to him on the 30th of May, to 
 this effect: — " I fear that in London they may treat 
 too lightly the idea of a new Russian expedition 
 to Constantinople." Marshal Soult was speedily 
 satisfied on this point. M. de Bourqueney replied on 
 the 17th of June: " The council has debated on the 
 probable case, in which, uncalled for by circum- 
 stances, and exceeding even the bounds of reasonable 
 anticipation, we should find the Russians established 
 at Constantinople, or in march towards the capital of 
 the Ottoman empire. This paramount question has 
 been argued under the strong effect produced by the 
 phrase in your Excellency's despatch. No. 16: 'I 
 fear that in London they may treat too lightly the 
 idea of a new Russian expedition.' The council is 
 of opinion that in this case our squadrons should 
 appear before Constantinople as friends, if the Sultan 
 accepted our aid, and by force if he refused it. The 
 question of the military passage of the Dardanelles
 
 336 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 
 
 has also been debated. It is considered possible, but 
 dangerous during the six winter months, when the 
 wind sets from the Mediterranean. During the six 
 others it is looked upon as easy ; but troops for dis- 
 embarkation will be required. I need scarcely add, 
 that the idea of this last measure is, if I may so ex- 
 press myself, an extreme conjecture; and that our 
 influence must be exerted to induce England to act 
 upon it. Marshal Soult immediately rej^lied to these 
 dispositions of the English cabinet: — "We think," 
 he wrote to Baron de Bourqueney, " that at the same 
 moment when the Russians arrive at Constantinople, 
 the great interests of the EurojDean equilibrium, and 
 perhaps still more the jealousies of public opinion, 
 justly exactmg, would require that the flags of Eng- 
 land and France should display themselves there also :" 
 and he forwarded to M. de Bourqueney the draft of 
 a note wliich Admiral Roussin was to be instructed 
 to present to the Porte, concluding thus : — " The 
 King's government feels convinced that it only anti- 
 cipates the intentions of the Sublime Porte, in re- 
 quiring that in case the land or sea forces of one or 
 more of the allied courts should be summoned to 
 Constantinople, orders would be given to open   at 
 once the passage of the Dardanelles to a French 
 squadron, hastening, on its part, to protect the Sultan's 
 throne from peiils, the imminence of which would 
 render such a measure imperative." 
 
 There was some difference of opinion and plan be- 
 tween the two cabinets, as to the tenns and mode of 
 execution of this step; but these secondary diffi-
 
 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 337 
 
 culties were easily smoothed, and produced no check 
 to the active harmony of the two governments. As- 
 sured of the co-operation of England, King Louis- 
 Philippe and his advisers evmced as little hesitation 
 in 1839, to act energetically m the East, and to force 
 the Dardanelles if necessary, than they had shown 
 in 1832, by entering Belgium and laying siege to 
 Antwerp. 
 
 In presence of these sudden events, of the di- 
 plomatic movement they excited throughout Europe, 
 and above all of the intimate understanding between 
 Paris and London, the Court of Russia looked on in 
 silence and remained in suspense, visibly disturbed 
 by the impending future, and doubtful of the at- 
 titude it would have to assume. The hereditary 
 grand duke, now the Emperor Alexander II., was at 
 that time in London accompanied by Count Orloff. 
 " Whenever I have met Count Orloff during the last 
 five days," M. de Bourqueney wrote to Marshal Soult 
 on the 29th of May, " he has denied with affecta- 
 tion, in my presence, the authenticity of the news of 
 the resumption of hostilities between the Turks and 
 Egyptians. He founds his assertion on the last 
 letters of the Emperor. Your Excellency knows that 
 he assumes freely to be the confidant of the Imperial 
 thought. He has held the same language to nearly 
 all the members of the diplomatic body." And some 
 days later, on the 17th of Jtme, the envoy continued 
 — " The Russian embassy listens, watches, but hesi- 
 tates both in action and language. There have been 
 many Russians during the last month in London, and 
 
 VOL. IV. z
 
 338 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 
 
 amongst them some enjoying the highest confidence 
 of the Emperor. I venture with tmiidity an opmion 
 hastily formed; but it appears to me that in that 
 quarter they are not prepared for extreme mea- 
 sures." Precisely at the same date, the instructions 
 of Count Nesselrode to Count Pozzo di Borgo, at that 
 time Russian ambassador in London, fully confirmed 
 Baron de Bourqueney's conjecture. "Far from seek- 
 ing to provoke a complication in the Levant," the 
 vice-chancellor of Russia wrote, " we are using our 
 utmost endeavours to prevent it; and ui place of 
 availing ourselves eagerly of our treaty of alliance 
 Avith the Porte, we are foremost in desiring to ward 
 off the renewal of a crisis which Avould compel us 
 against our ^vill, to resume a militar}^ attitude on the 
 shores "of the Bosphorus." ^ Three weeks later, on 
 the 8th of July, the English ambassador at St. 
 Petersbourg, Lord Clanricarde, wrote as follows to 
 Lord Palmerston : " On all occasions Count Nessel- 
 rode has expressed to me the desire of the Russian 
 government to avoid the possibility of a casus foederis 
 in virtue of the treaty of Unkiar-Skelessi. He has 
 held the same language to all my colleagues, and I 
 believe this desire to be as sincere on his part as it 
 is anxiously conveyed." Facts soon proved that the 
 pacific inquietudes of the Russian cabinet were 
 genuine. It consented without difficulty to the pro- 
 posals for common deliberation submitted by Prince 
 Metternich, and on the 11th of July, Lord Beauvale, 
 the ambassador of England at Vienna was able to 
 
 • Correspondence on the ulHurs of the Levant, Part I. p. 98.
 
 TIIE EASTERN QUESTION. 339 
 
 write thus to Lord Palmerston : " The j^lan of paci- 
 fication between the Porte and Mehemet Ali is 
 already sketched out, and may be considered as 
 adopted by England, Austria, Prussia, and Russia. 
 France alone remams. Prince Metternich expects 
 the English government to persuade France."^ 
 
 While the diplomatists were conversing or corre- 
 spondmg, events had hurried on and materially altered 
 the position. The aide-de-camp despatched by Marshal 
 Soult to Egypt, Colonel Callier, had obtained from 
 Mehemet Ali a letter commanding his son Ibrahun to 
 suspend hostihties ; but when Colonel Callier reached 
 the Egyptian head-quarters, he found not only the 
 war commenced, but the Turkish army beaten and 
 destroyed. Five days before his arrival, on the 21st 
 of June, 1839, a battle had been fought near the 
 \illage of Nezib, and after two hours of weak combat, 
 the forces of the Sultan, general and soldiers, fled in 
 confusion, leaving in the hands of the victor 9000 pri- 
 soners, their artiUery and their camp. When the 
 news of this defeat reached Constantinople, the Sultan 
 Mahmoud had ceased to live. He expired six days 
 before, on the 30th of June, cursing with frenzy the 
 name of Mehemet Ali, and nevertheless grantmg an 
 order to Marshal Soult's second aide-de-camp. Colonel 
 Foltz, for the suspension of hostilities. Fifteen days 
 had scarcely elapsed from the accession of the young 
 son of Mahmoud, the Sultan Abdul Medjid to the 
 throne of his father, when the commander-in-chief 
 of the maritime forces, the Capitan-Pacha Achmet- 
 
 ' Correspondence on the affairs of the Levant, Parti, pp. 169, 177. 
 
 z 2
 
 340 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 
 
 Feruzi, who had recently left the Sea of Marmara, 
 carried his squadron consisting of nineteen men of 
 war to Alexandria, and surrendered it to Mehcmet 
 Ali. Within three weeks Turkey had lost her sove- 
 reign, her army, and her fleet. 
 
 So many disasters, rapidly accumulated, plunged 
 Constantinople into utter dismay. The young Sultan 
 and his ministers expected to see the Pacha of Egypt 
 advance immediately by land and sea, against the 
 capital of the empire. They hastened to anticipate him 
 by peaceful arrangements. His old enemy, the grand 
 vizier Khosrew-Pacha, wrote thus on the 5th of July : 
 " His Highness, actuated by justice and wisdom, 
 qualities ^Yith which heaven has blessed him, has 
 declared on mountino* the throne that ' the Pacha of 
 Egypt, Mehemet Ali, ha\dng indulged in certain 
 offensive proceedings against my late father of glorious 
 memory, many events have occurred in consequence, 
 and even recently preparations have been undertaken. 
 But I neither desire the tranquillity of my subjects 
 to be disturbed, nor Mussulman blood to be shed. I 
 therefore forget the past, and provided that Mehemet 
 Ali perfonns without scruple the duties of subjection 
 and vassalage, I bestow on him my sovereign pardon ; 
 I reserve for him a magnificent decoration similar to 
 that of my other illustiious idziers, and I grant to his 
 sons the hereditary succession to the government of 
 Egypt.'" Two days before, on the 3rd of July, the 
 Turkish Minister of Foreign Affairs, Nourri-Effendi, 
 convened at his palace the representatives of the five 
 great powers, and communicated to them this resolution
 
 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 3J:1 
 
 of the Sultan. " We inquired," Lord Ponsonby wrote 
 on the 5th to the Consul-general of England, at Alex- 
 andria, " whether it was intended to leave Mehemet 
 Ali in possession of Syria, of Mecca, of Medina, or of 
 St. Jean d'Acre, and the answer was in the negative." 
 The Porte, however, was far from being firmly resolved 
 on these limits to its concessions, for on the 22nd of 
 July following, the first dragoman of the English 
 embassy at Constantinople, M. Frederic Pisani, wrote 
 to Lord Ponsonby, saying, " The Porte is well dis- 
 posed to treat with Mehemet Ali on the following 
 bases, proposed, as it atfirms, by Prince Metternich, 
 and approved of by the cabinet of St. James's : 1 . The 
 government of Egypt to be assigned hereditarily to 
 Mehemet Ali; 2. the government of all Syria to 
 Ibrahim Pacha; 3. on the death of Mehemet Ali, 
 Ibrahim Pacha to succeed to the government of 
 Egyi^t, and Syria to return again as formerly, to the 
 immediate authority of the Porte." 
 
 Prmce Metternich had neither proposed, nor had 
 the English cabinet approved of these conditions ; but 
 the Porte, treating exclusively with the Pacha of 
 Egypt had given reason to believe that it was pre- 
 pared to concede them. 
 
 When the news of this direct negotiation between 
 Constantinople and Alexandria, with its probable 
 issue, reached the European cabinets, very opposite 
 impressions were produced. At St. Petersbourg warm 
 satisfaction was expressed, with a ready approval that 
 the Turco-Egyptian question should be debated and 
 settled between the interested parties themselves. 
 
 z 3
 
 312 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 
 
 Russia tlius escaped from the common intervention of 
 the great powers in the affairs of the East, and from 
 the necessity of losing, by association with them, her 
 isolated and independent position. On the 27th of 
 July, Count Nesselrode forwarded instructions on this 
 subject to M. de Kisseleff, Russian charge d'affaires 
 in London \ and on the 9th of August follomng, 
 M. de Bourqueney wrote to Marshal Soult : " Lord 
 Palmerston informed me yesterday that according to 
 news from Berlin, Russia withdrew from the projected 
 negotiations at Vienna. M. de Kisseleff, who followed 
 me at Lord Palmerston's, was charged with a com- 
 munication to the same effect. It is from a feeling of 
 respect for the independence of sfevereign states, that 
 the Russian caljinet declines all intervention in the 
 internal affairs of Turkey. Before the events in Syria, 
 previous to the death of the Sultan, when there ap- 
 peared no other possible issue than war to the diffe- 
 rences between the Porte and Egypt, the Russian cabi- 
 netmight have agreed in opinion with the other powers 
 of Europe, on the advantage of opening a negotiation 
 irrespective of the parties immediately concerned; 
 but now when the Porte itself anticipates a recon- 
 ciliation, and proposes acceptable terms of adjustment 
 to Egyi^t, it feels disposed to allow the negotiation at 
 Constantinople to proceed without interference, and 
 merely to second it by good intentions. Such is the 
 spirit of Count Nesselrode's communication. The 
 King's government will feel no surprise at this over- 
 
 ' Correspondence relative to the affairs of the Levant, Part. I. 
 r- 157.
 
 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 343 
 
 ture from tlie cabinet of St. Petersbourg; your Ex- 
 cellency's correspondence has repeatedly announced 
 it. Here, where they readily adopt what they wish to 
 believe, more confidence had been entertained, not in 
 the sincerity of the dispositions of Russia, but in the 
 necessities of the European position. Greater asto- 
 nishment has therefore been evinced than will be ex- 
 pressed in Paris. But, finally, the motives of M. de 
 Nesselrode's last despatch have been understood, and 
 an evident proof thereby conveyed that if the Imperial 
 cabmet does not believe the fittmg moment to be ar- 
 rived for committmg itself openly with Europe on the 
 aifairs of the East, it is at least determined to struggle 
 diplomatically against the written guarantees which 
 might threaten to enchain the future. Lord Palmer- 
 ston received the communication of M. de Kisseleff 
 courteously, but without permitting him to deceive 
 himself as to the opinion he had formed of it." 
 
 Lord Palmerston felt perfectly at ease m declining 
 the overture of the Russian court, and in allowing it 
 to appear that he correctly estimated its motives. 
 He knew beforehand with certainty, that in this new 
 phase of the Egyptian question, the policy of England 
 would meet with the adhesion and co-operation of 
 Erance. As early as the 26th of July, on learning 
 the pacific overtures of the Porte to Mehemet Ali, 
 Marshal Soult had written to Baron cle Bourqueney : 
 " The rapidity with which events proceed excite ap- 
 prehension that the crisis may unravel itself by some 
 arrangement in which the European powers will have 
 no time to interfere, so that the interests essential to 
 
 z 4
 
 3-14 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 
 
 general policy might not be sufficiently considered. 
 For England as for France, for Austria also, although 
 she does not openly avow it, the principal, the true 
 object of concert is to control Russia, and to accustom 
 her to treat in common on Eastern affairs. I think, 
 therefore, that the powers, while giving full approba- 
 tion to the conciliatory sentiments manifested by the 
 Porte, ought to compel it to precipitate nothing, and 
 to treat with the Viceroy only through the interme- 
 diation of the allies, Avhose concurrence would un- 
 doubtedly furnish means of obtaining less disad- 
 vantageous and better secured conditions." Lord 
 Palmerston eagerly accepted this perseverance of the 
 French cabinet to make the accommodation between 
 the Porte and Egypt a European question. " He is 
 strongly impressed," M. de Bourqueney replied to 
 Marshal Soult, "with a fear that the Eussian cabinet 
 may urge the authorities at Constantinople to a direct 
 settlement between the Porte and Mehemet Ali, 
 which would cause the negotiations at Vienna, and 
 the contingent guarantees, to fail, by rendering them 
 useless ; but he thinks that even in the admitted case 
 of direct intervention, we should continue our efforts 
 to educe from the moral concurrence of the four 
 courts an act to which the fifth would be constrained 
 to subscribe."^ 
 
 This result was easily accomplished. The court of 
 Eussia, as circumspect in conduct as haughty in atti- 
 tude, considered it more important not to become 
 isolated in Europe than to maintain its isolated posi- 
 
 ' Baron de Bourqueney to Marshal Soult, July 27th, 1839.
 
 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 345 
 
 tion at Constantinople. It ceased to insist that the 
 Porte, from respect to its independence, should be 
 left alone in presence of Mehemet Ali, and free to 
 negotiate directly with him on its own proposals. 
 The Emperor Nicholas declared himself ready to act 
 in concert with England, Austria, France and Prussia, 
 if they still felt themselves called upon to take the 
 negotiations in hand; and on the 27th of July, the 
 representatives of the five courts at Constantinople 
 addressed the following note to the Porte : " The 
 undersigned have this morning received instructions 
 from their respective governments, in virtue of which 
 they have the honour to inform the Sublime Porte 
 that the five powers are perfectly agreed upon the 
 Eastern question, and also to require that all defini- 
 tive arrangements may be suspended until their con- 
 currence is obtained, while waiting the effect of the 
 interest they conjointly feel and exert." 
 
 At this step the English ambassador. Lord Ponsonby, 
 expressed unbounded joy. On the 29th of July he 
 wrote to Lord Palmerston : " On the morning of the 
 27th, Baron de Stiii-mer received Prince Metternich's 
 instructions, and on the same evening the note was 
 signed and remitted. I beg here to express, vnih all 
 humility, my approbation of the activity and promp- 
 titude with which the Baron has acted. I consider 
 this measure as the most salutary it was possible to 
 adopt. It was also extremely opportune, as the 
 Ottoman ministry had resolved on concessions to the 
 Pacha of Egypt, which at this moment would have 
 been on the road to Alexandria, and would have
 
 34G THE EASTERN QUESTION. 
 
 deplorably comj^licated the affairs of this empire. Our 
 step has given the grand vizier strength and courage to 
 resist the Pacha and to defend the rights and interests 
 of the Sultan. It will also, I think, secure the tran- 
 quillity of the capital, and, in consequence, the 
 security of its foreign and Christian inhabitants. It 
 opens the path to every measure that her Majesty's 
 government may consider good and useful to be 
 adopted. It has given her Majesty's government a 
 position which enables it to guarantee the future 
 integrity and independence of Turkey."' 
 
 The French cabinet was not sIoav in discovering; 
 that this step placed it in a less convenient and power- 
 ful position than that which England expected to ob- 
 tain. It had pledged itself to prevent the Eastern 
 question from being settled in the East itself between 
 the two interested parties, and to decide it in the West, 
 by mutual accordance of the five great powers ; it had 
 declared to the Porte " that this accordance was as- 
 sured;" Avhile far from feeling convinced of this assur- 
 ance, it had already begun to perceive how much its 
 views on the definitive arrangement between the Sul- 
 tan and the Pacha differed from those of Eng^land. 
 As far back as the 16th of June, Lord Palmerston had 
 said to M. de Bourqueney : " We must open a negotia- 
 tion at Constantinople and Alexandria, on the double 
 basis of the establishment of the hereditary succession 
 in Egypt of the family of Mehemet Ali, and of the 
 evacuation of Syria by the Egyptian troops. The 
 
 ' Correspondence relative to the afTiiirs of the Levant, Part I. 
 pp. 292, 293.
 
 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 347 
 
 opinion of the Council is that we shall encounter no 
 serious difficulty at Constantinople ; and that if any 
 should present itself at Alexandria, it would suffice 
 to convince the Pacha of our union to overcome it." 
 Without at first formally rejecting this view of the 
 English cabinet, and without a frank explanation of 
 what was to be conceded to Mehemet Ali, Marshal 
 Soult instructed M. de Bourqueney to express different 
 dispositions. " It is necessary," he wrote to him, on 
 the 26th of July, "that the firmness — I had almost 
 said the severity — of the advice which the powers 
 may tender should be tempered by a tone of modera- 
 tion and good-will, which, while checking the boldness 
 of Mehemet Ali, may not too deeply wound his pride 
 and ambition. There would undoubtedly be affecta- 
 tion in seeming to believe that after the success which 
 the mad aggression of the Porte has opened to him, 
 he has nothing more to expect than he had a right to 
 demand before. This would be to deny the empire 
 of facts and the necessities of the position. If the 
 Viceroy were to convince himself that he had nothing 
 to expect from the equity of the powers, he would re- 
 volt against their imperious representations, and his 
 irritation might lead, from one moment to another, to 
 consequences the simple possibility of which is suffi- 
 cient to startle every calculating mind." When M. de 
 Bourqueney communicated to Lord Palmerston this 
 despatch, at once clear and vague, the English minister, 
 in reply, developed his entire thought. " The more 
 I reflect," he said, " on this Eastern question (and 
 I assure you I divest my mind of all prepossession on
 
 318 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 
 
 the subject exclusively English), the more I arrive 
 at this conclusion : that France and England can only 
 desire identically the same thing, — the security and 
 strength of the Ottoman em2:>ire ; or, if these words 
 are too ambitious, its return to a state which leaves 
 the least possible chance for foreign intervention. 
 Well; we shall only attain this object by placing the 
 desert between the Sultan and his vassal. Let Mehemet 
 Ali remain master of his Egypt, let him obtain the 
 heirship which has been the constant aim of his efforts ; 
 but let there be no nearer vicinity, and consequently 
 no possible collision between the rival powers. Russia 
 covets (prospectively) the European provinces, and at 
 the bottom of her heart she rejoices to see the Asiatic 
 limbs separate themselves from the Ottoman body. 
 Can we promote this interest? Evidently not. They 
 speak of the material difficulties we shall encounter in 
 accomplishing our end. I think Mehemet Ali could 
 not slight a sincere desire expressed in common by 
 the great powers; but should he do so, his rights 
 would not be strengthened by contemning the coun- 
 sels of Europe, and if force became necessary, the re- 
 sult could neither be long nor doubtful. Such is the 
 well-considered opinion of the English cabinet. If we 
 thought that Mehemet Ali could seat himself, strong 
 and respected, upon the Ottoman throne, and possess 
 the empire in its independence and integrity, we should 
 say, — let it be so; but feeling convinced that if any 
 thing still survi\'es in Turkey, it is a religious reverence 
 for the imperial family, and that the Avhole nation will 
 never consent to look on Mehemet as a descendant of
 
 THE EASTEEN QUESTION. 349 
 
 the Prophet, God forbid that we should embark hi such 
 a policy ! We should find a second South America in 
 the East; and this last would have neighbours who 
 would not suffer it to consume itself eternally in in- 
 testine struggles." And six days later, returning to 
 the conversation with ardour, — "I cannot sufficiently 
 repeat to you," observed Lord Palmerston to M. de 
 Bourqueney, " how entirely my conviction is divested 
 of all political considerations exclusively English. 
 But I suppose Egypt and Syria hereditarily invested 
 in the family of Mehemet Ali, and I ask myself how 
 Europe can flatter herself that the slightest incident 
 may not occur to sever the last and feeble tie which 
 will unite these provinces to the Ottoman empire? 
 Independence must follow in the track of heirship. 
 And do you consider what Europe will then say when 
 Eussia resumes her long-indulged craving after the 
 European provinces? — that the Ottoman Empire, 
 dismembered by the separation of a part of the Asiatic 
 dependencies, is no longer worth the risk of a war for 
 its maintenance. Such is the train of ideas I follow 
 in judging this important question. But at the same 
 time, I lay no stress on the infallibility of my OA^ai 
 opinion: I perfectly conceive that another may be 
 adopted ; and I look for no French prepossession in the 
 views expressed by Marshal Soult. I am so strongly 
 impressed with the good faith of that policy, that here 
 is an aro'ument which would con\dnce me if I were 
 disposed to doubt it : France requires the exercise of 
 influence in Egypt ; this is and ought to be ; it is one 
 of those data which must be admitted in general policy.
 
 350 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 
 
 Well ; you -wish to make Egypt stronger than we do, — 
 and, nevertheless, your influence over the sovereign of 
 Egy|3t, be he who he may, would increase by reason 
 of his weakness. You see that I seek for no mental 
 reservation, under the divergence of our two points 
 of view." 
 
 However they might differ, it was not the diver- 
 gence of these two points of view in the general 
 policy which, as regarded the French cabinet, formed 
 the difficulty of the question and situation. In its 
 perseverance in demanding for Mehemet Ali the here- 
 ditary possession of Syria, it was decided by two 
 motives less systematic and more direct. The cause 
 of Mehemet Ali was extremely popular in France. 
 Influenced, as I have said, by our recent reminiscences, 
 and by an indefinable and instinctive confusion of our 
 conquests with his conquests, of our glory -with his 
 glory, we took a warm interest in the fortunes of the 
 Pacha, and looked upon them as immediately con- 
 nected "with the power of France. The brilliant 
 debates of which this matter had lately been the 
 subject, the remarkable report of M. Joufiroy on the 
 ten millions demanded by the cabinet for our mari- 
 time armaments, the eagerness of the Chambers to 
 vote this credit, — all had combmed to increase the im- 
 portance of the question, and to elevate the sovereign 
 of Egypt. We had, moreover, an extremely exag- 
 gerated idea of his strength; we pictured him as 
 able and determined to confront the powers, if they 
 resisted his desires, vdih a desperate oj)position, and 
 to plunge in flames, at first the East, and subse-
 
 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 351 
 
 quently Eui'ope itself. Governed by the public feel- 
 ing, and deceived by its o^vn presentiments, the French 
 ministry persisted in contravening, on this point, the 
 views of the English cabinet, and in supporting the 
 Pacha in his pretensions to the hereditary government 
 of Syria, which England persevered in peremptorily 
 refusing. 
 
 This was, on our part, a serious error; an error 
 which, from the first moment, entangled our policy in 
 an evil path, and which we had the less excuse for 
 falling into, as it was in contradiction with the con- 
 duct we had pursued, a few years before, in an ana- 
 logous conjuncture. When Europe determined to 
 sanction a first dismembemaent of the Ottoman 
 empire, and to estal)lisli the kingdom of Greece, we 
 demanded, in addition, for the new state, a more 
 extensive territory; we wished to bestow on it Thes- 
 saly, Candia, and better frontiers. On this point we 
 were opposed by the English government, and re- 
 nounced a portion of our plan, justly attributing 
 more importance to the actual establishment of a new 
 sovereignty than to its extent, and to our general 
 success than to a partial disappointment. In 1839 
 we were in a similar position, which recommended the 
 same forbearance. Looking at things as they were, 
 and in themselves, it would assuredly have been better 
 that instead of falling back under the power of the 
 Porte, Syria should remain in the hands of Mehemet 
 Ali. By his close vicinity, by the vigour of his ad- 
 ministration, the energy of his power, and his freedom 
 from all Mohammedan fanaticism, the Pacha of Egypt
 
 o.K^: 
 
 52 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 
 
 would have maintained in that countiy, for the be- 
 nefit of its different populations, and above all for the 
 advantage of the Christians, more order and security 
 than the Porte was either able or disposed to afford. 
 If this solution had been then adopted, Europe would 
 perhaps have escaped the lamentable spectacles and 
 inextiicable embarrassments at this moment presented 
 by Syria. But for France and her government it 
 would have been a much wiser and more skilful 
 policy to have confirmed, in concert with England, 
 the pnncipal conquest of Mehemet Ali, than to have 
 separated from the British cabinet to second the Pacha 
 in all his desires. Egypt, held in hereditary j^osses- 
 sion by princes almost independent, was a great addi- 
 tional step in the course of the partial and natural 
 dismemberment of the Ottoman empire recognized by 
 Europe, and in the formation or preparation of new 
 states. Such, in that crisis, was the true policy of 
 France ; she had recently proclaimed it openly, and 
 exercised it with success ; she compromised it through 
 an inconsiderate exigency, at the moment when she 
 coidd have illustrated it by a new and brilliant 
 application. 
 
 One fact alone should have revealed to France the 
 danger of her obstinate demand, — the satisfaction un- 
 reservedly evinced by the English cabinet, as it had 
 betrayed itself in tlie correspondence of Lord Pon- 
 sonby, when informed that the Russian minister at 
 Constantinople, M. de Bouteneff, liad signed the note 
 of the 27th of Jul v, which detached the Porte from 
 all direct communication with Mehemet Ali, and pro-
 
 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 353 
 
 mised the concurrence and support of the five great 
 jDowers. Baron de Bourqueney wrote to Marshal 
 Soult': "This sudden adhesion of the Russian 
 minister to a step of such importance was little ex- 
 jDected. In London, as undoubtedly in Paris, people 
 reasoned on the general datum that the Russian cabi- 
 net had not only declined to ^participate in the com- 
 mon negotiation at Yienna, but was labouring to 
 render it useless, by encouraging the conclusion of a 
 direct arrangement between the sovereign and the 
 vassal, without any (at least apparent) external mter- 
 
 vention A great change has taken place within 
 
 the last eight-and-thirty hours in the spirit of the 
 members of the English cabinet. The jDossibility of the 
 concurrence of Russia was not previously admitted ; 
 now it is hoped for : the co-oj^eration of Austria was 
 hoped for to the end ; it has now become certain. It 
 is therefore concluded that the time has arrived for 
 relaxing, in some degree, the threatening and sus- 
 pticious attitude assumed towards Russia, without 
 j)rejudice to its subsequent resumption, in a more 
 decided form, should circumstances so require." 
 
 There was as little expectation in Paris as in London 
 that Russia would suddenly renounce her isolated 
 position, and accede fully to the common action of the 
 five powers. But without belie^dng in such a reso- 
 lution, the possibility and danger were foreseen. On 
 the 1st of August Marshal Soult wrote to Baron de 
 Bourqueney : "I have never expected that in the 
 actual question Russia could be brought to associate 
 
 1 Despatch of the 18th of August, 1839. 
 VOL. IV, A A
 
 354 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 
 
 herself frankly witli the other cabinets in a policy so 
 opposed to her own. I thought that while appearing 
 to Avork to that end, while adopting towards Russia 
 the most conciliatory style, the sole object we could 
 propose to ourselves would be to restrain and intimi- 
 date her to a certain point by a demonstration of the 
 perfect understanding between the other great powers 
 united in one common mterest. With this object in 
 view, it Avould be essential that the powers, more 
 particularly France and England, should hold a 
 language with the cabmet of St. Petersbourg entirely 
 uniform, and should only act by concerted measures. 
 Thus I saw with regret the step which Lord Clanri- 
 carde was instructed to take "with M. de Nesselrode. 
 The Russian government will naturally deduce from 
 thence that on one point at least, — the limits to be 
 imposed on Mehemet Ali, — England expected to find 
 more sympathy with it than with the other cabinets. 
 It will be led to conclude, very erroneously without 
 doubt, that an alliance in which such divergencies 
 manifested themselves could possess few homogeneous 
 or imposing elements." 
 
 The French cabinet might regret the step which, 
 by an order from Lord Palmerston, dated the 9th of 
 July preceding. Lord Clanricarde had taken with the 
 Russian government \ but it had no right either to 
 express astonishment or complaint. That step was 
 perfectly simple, and the natural result of the general 
 position. Lord Palmerston directed Lord Clanri- 
 carde to make the same communications and proposi- 
 
 ' Correspondence relative to tlie affairs of the Levant, Part I. 
 pp. 156, 158.
 
 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 355 
 
 tions at St. Petersbourg which Lord Granville was 
 commissioned to deliver in Paris. He had given to 
 the representatives of England at the four great 
 continental courts the same mstructions on the 
 Egyptian question, and had manifested in all quarters 
 the same views founded on the same reasons. In his 
 conversations with Baron de Bourqueney, he expressed 
 without reserve his mistrust of Russia and his desire 
 for a close connection with France. But he could 
 not exclude Russia from the European concurrence 
 he demanded, nor address her in a language different 
 from that adopted towards the other powers. In 
 allowing itself to be led away, on this occasion, by an 
 impulse of exclusive humour, the French cabinet fell 
 into the mistake which Prince Metternich pointed 
 out when he said, " France, in speaking to others, is 
 too often disposed to think herself single ; when we 
 negotiate, we are many." 
 
 Two mcidents, nearly simultaneous, occurred at 
 this epoch, to hasten without changing the course of 
 the negotiation. At the commencement of September 
 1839, General Sebastiani, who until then had been 
 on leave of absence in Paris, returned to London to 
 resume his post as ambassador; and a few days later, 
 Baron de Brunnow arrived from St. Petersburg, spe- 
 cially instructed to treat of the affairs of the East, 
 and to superintend the Russian legation in general. 
 Both were able negotiators, although of extremely 
 different characters. General Sebastiani possessed a 
 firm, calm, sagacious mind, clear but not complicated, 
 a little slow and unimaginative, not particularly 
 
 A A 2
 
 356 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 
 
 ready with tongue or pen, but imperturbably judicious 
 and provident; prompt to recognize the attainable 
 end, and how to demand or concede for its accom- 
 plishment. Baron de Brunnow, brought up in the 
 designs and traditions of the Kussian chancery, was 
 well-informed, clever, persevering without obstinacy, 
 neither exacting nor impatient, an eloquent and lively 
 talker, an experienced and ready reporter, dexterous 
 in unravelling the aims of others, and in enveloping 
 his own under a thick mantle of concessions, reserves, 
 and commentaries. They began to work, from the 
 moment of their arrival, the one to lead back Lord 
 Palmerston to the paths to which France still held, 
 the other to persuade him that Russia would follow 
 in those in which he was disposed to march. 
 
 General Sebastiani speedily delivered his govern- 
 ment from all illusion. On the 5th of September he 
 wrote to Marshal Soult : "I have to announce to your 
 Excellency that the impression resulting from my 
 first interview with Lord Palmerston is, that the 
 English government desires with us, to the same 
 extent, and with as little mental reservation, the 
 maintenance of the Ottoman empire in its full inde- 
 pendence and integrity, and that it wishes to accom- 
 plish this end pacifically and without compromising 
 
 the great powers amongst themselves But I 
 
 cannot conceal from your Excellency the disposition 
 of the English cabinet to employ coercive measures 
 against Mehemet Ali to obtain the restitution of the 
 Ottoman fleet, and to force him to accept the here- 
 ditary sovereignty of Egypt as the basis of the
 
 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 357 
 
 intervening accommodation with the Porte. This 
 disposition may from time to time yield, upon certain 
 points, to the representations of France, but it ever 
 re-appears ; and if it encounters on our part an in- 
 vincible and absolute repugnance to the adoption of 
 any compulsive means whatever against the Vice- 
 roy, I fear that they will become persuaded here that 
 it is useless to continue a negotiation which takes 
 beforehand from their counsels the sanction, should it 
 eventually become necessary, of force." 
 
 On the 14th and 17th of September, General Se- 
 bastiani, returning from Broadlands, Lord Palmer- 
 ston's country seat, where he had passed two days, 
 again wrote to Marshal Soult : "In the midst of our 
 conference. Lord Palmerston's courier from London 
 arrived, bringing despatches from St. Petersbourg, 
 Berhn, Vienna, and Constantinople. Lord Palmer- 
 ston read them all to me. Lord Ponsonby writes 
 from Constantinople that the divan has re-assembled, 
 and has decided that nothing should be ceded to Me- 
 hemet Ali beyond the hereditary investiture of Egypt. 
 From Vienna Lord Beauvale announces that the 
 Austrian cabmet adopts more and more the English 
 point of view as to the necessity of confining to 
 Egypt the territorial possessions of the Viceroy. At 
 Berlm, the same favour towards the English project. 
 Finally, Lord Clanricarde writes from St. Petersbourg 
 that the Russian cabmet coincides sincerely with the 
 intentions of the British mmistry ; that it accords in 
 opinion with the bases of the projected arrangement, 
 and offers its co-operation. ' Judge,' contimied Lord 
 
 A A 3
 
 358 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 
 
 Palmerston, ' whether it is jDossible to renounce a sys- 
 tem we have adopted, at the very moment when it com- 
 bines the wishes and efforts of nearly all the powers in 
 concert with whom we have undertaken to settle pa- 
 cifically the question of the East. This system, I camiot 
 too often repeat to you, is founded on a single basis. 
 The dangers of the Porte at this moment proceed from 
 its vassal alone. There are others which threaten, 
 but they belong to the future. It is from the perils 
 of the present that we must furnish a guarantee. We 
 have given a serious warning to the power from 
 whence the prospective mischief may be expected. 
 Mehemet Ali must be rendered incapable of repeat- 
 ing, and perhaps of rendering more decisive, the blows 
 he has already inflicted on the Ottoman empire. 
 Such is the general datum on which all the de- 
 terminations of the English cabinet are founded. I 
 am here only its organ; but I cannot sufficiently 
 express to you how profoundly grieved I am to see 
 the French cabinet, with which we have entered upon 
 the question in such perfect cordiality, separate from 
 us and from all the other powers. I allow fully for 
 the particular circumstances in which you are placed ; 
 I know that you have prejudices of public opinion 
 to deal with ; but whatever may be the cause of our 
 misunderstanding, I bitterly deplore it, and nothing 
 would be more agreeable to us than to obtain a glimpse 
 of its probable termination.' I asked Lord Pahner- 
 ston whether he did not find matter for reflection 
 in this facility with which Russia anticipated the 
 English project. It is an extremely ephemeral con-
 
 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 359 
 
 junction, I added, a coincidence of views too fortuitous 
 to demand the sacrifice of an alliance of principles 
 and sentiments. ' Yes,' answered Lord Palmerston, 
 ' we are perfectly well aware that this is entirely an 
 arrangement of circumstance, which ^vill not prevent 
 the two Imes of policy from resuming in due tune 
 their natural walk; but how reject it, when it comes 
 in aid of the mterests we wish to defend, and when, 
 by the simple admission of our mutual concurrence, 
 it seems to renounce the exclusive protectorate and 
 almost preponderating influence against which we 
 are contending? I tell you, moreover, frankly, and 
 I am far mdeed from bemg pleased at it, I feel con- 
 vinced that the Russian cabmet, m its blmd and 
 senseless prejudice against France, has been strongly 
 prepossessed Avith an anxiety to place our disagree- 
 ment in evidence, and to take part with our view 
 against yours. There is no imaginable conciliation 
 which Russia has not practised towards us during 
 the last year to divide our two governments; we 
 have remamed cold to all her advances; we started 
 with you, and we wish to continue marching mth 
 you; but how can you expect us to abandon our 
 point at the very moment when Russia yields ac- 
 cordance, and when the two other powers have al- 
 ready adopted it? The French cabinet seems at this 
 moment to separate itself, not alone from us, but from 
 the combined European movement. We are un- 
 willing to abandon the hope of its return. . . . The 
 formal and preliminary renunciation of all coercive 
 measures against Mehemet Ali would, in fact, raise a 
 
 A A 4
 
 360 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 
 
 barrier between France and England. Declare at 
 least that you do not sanction all the pretensions of 
 the Pacha, and that these pretensions, if they remained 
 in their full integrity, would find you disposed, as our 
 allies, in case of need to employ force. The negotiation 
 then can take its course. If the French cabinet per- 
 sists, on the contrary, in proclaiming beforehand that 
 under no circumstances will it consent to use com- 
 pulsion against the Pacha, there is no longer any 
 possible unity in the question.' " 
 
 General Sebastiani concluded his despatch by 
 saying, " To-day M. de Brunnow is to have his first 
 audience of Lord Palmerston." 
 
 Notwithstanding the information transmitted, and 
 the opinion clearly conveyed, although with some 
 reserve, by our ambassador, the French cabinet per- 
 sisted in its attitude. It was resolved not to compel 
 Mehemet Ali to renounce the hereditary possession 
 of Sp'ia, and not to associate itself, if he maintained 
 his pretensions, with coercive measures against him. 
 The English government felt perplexed. Eager as 
 the conciliatory overtures of Russia had been, the 
 first proposals of M. de Brunnow were not satisfac- 
 tory. While accepting European concert on the 
 afi'airs of the East, the cabinet of St. Petersbourg 
 demanded that her men-of-war and troops should 
 enter alone into the Sea of Marmara to defend the 
 Porte in the name of Europe. This was, at the same 
 time, to abandon and maintam the treaty of Unkiar- 
 Skelessi. Russia renounced the protection of Con- 
 stantmople in virtue of an exclusive right and on
 
 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 361 
 
 her own account; but she remamecl, m fact, its sole 
 defender. In London, as in Paris, oifence was taken 
 at this mixture of obstinacy and condescension. 
 Several members of the English cabinet, however, 
 accorded with hesitation Lord Palmerston's views as 
 to the conditions of settlement between the Sultan 
 and his vassal. In the hope of obtaining the con- 
 currence of France, a concession was determined on 
 to the advantage of Mehemet Ali. General Sebas- 
 tiani wrote to Marshal Soult on the 3rd of October : 
 " The English cabinet does not adopt the propositions 
 presented by Baron de Brunnow. Lord Palmerston 
 announced this morning to the Russian envoy that 
 France, on her part, could not consent to the exclu- 
 sion of the allied fleets from the Sea of Marmara in the 
 event of Russian forces entering the Bosphorus ; and 
 that England would not detach herself from France, 
 with whom she had acted in perfect unity from the 
 commencement of the negotiation. This point being 
 laid down. Lord Palmerston suggested, mstead of 
 the convention presented by the Russian cabinet, 
 an agreement between the five powers, by which 
 they should regulate their respective action in the 
 existmg crisis of the afi'airs of the East, without 
 acknowledging any privilege to the Russian flag not 
 accorded to those of France, England, and Austria. 
 Russia, in case of resistance on the part of Mehemet 
 Ali to the conditions proposed to him, to employ her 
 troops in Asia Muior, but on her own side of the 
 Taurus. The independence and integrity of the 
 Ottoman empire under the reigning dynasty to be
 
 362 TUE EASTERN QUESTION. 
 
 stijuilated for, for the longest jDossible time; finally, 
 the closing of the Dardanelles to become a principle 
 of public l^Airopean law. Passing from this Euro- 
 pean act to the conditions of the impending ar- 
 rangement between the Sultan and the Pacha, Lord 
 Palmerston, pressed by my arguments, and by a 
 desire, Avhich I believe sincere, to perform an act of 
 deference towards France, consented, after a long 
 discussion, to add to the hereditary investiture of 
 Egypt, in favour of Mehemet Ali, the possession, 
 equally hereditary, of the pachalic of Acre. The 
 to^vn of Acre alone to remain to the Porte, and the 
 frontier to be marked out from the glacis of that 
 fortress in the direction of Lake Tiberias." 
 
 The French cabinet Avas disturbed by this offer. 
 It had always felt convinced that Mehemet Ali would 
 support his pretensions with equal force and perse- 
 verance, and that the English government would 
 never go to the extreme of allying itself in the East 
 with Russia. Popular opinion in France, moreover, 
 and the periodical j)ress, maintained with daily in- 
 creasing ardour the cause of the Pacha of Egypt, 
 watched anxiously for all rumours, all appearances, 
 however slight, of any arrangement entered into to 
 his detriment with the English cabinet, and treated 
 them beforehand as acts of anti-national baseness. 
 Marshal Soult rej^lied on the 14th of October to 
 General Sebastiani : " The King's government, after 
 having maturely weighed the objections of the cabinet 
 of London, feels bound to persist in the views I 
 have already communicated to you on the basis of
 
 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 363 
 
 a settlement of the affairs of the East. If our own 
 interest alone were concerned, we might make con- 
 cessions in favour of our desire to bind more closely 
 our alliance with England ; but the question is not 
 of that nature. It consists solely in determining 
 conditions which, while combining in just measure 
 the rights of the Sultan and the future security of 
 his throne with the pretensions of Mehemet Ali, 
 may tend to the pacification of the Ottoman empire. 
 We feel convinced that the proposals of the British 
 cabinet could not attain this end, and that, rather 
 than submit to them, Mehemet Ali, who would see 
 in them his ruin, would plunge into the chances of a 
 resistance less dangerous to himself but more embar- 
 rassing and compromising for Europe. . . . We 
 should decline driving him to this course, even 
 though we felt absolutely certain that our refusal 
 would be the signal for a close alliance between 
 England and Russia. Fortunately, this certainty is 
 far from existing; the reasons which have once al- 
 ready caused the failure of such a strange combi- 
 nation, subsist still in all their strength. I do not 
 believe they can escape the penetration of Lord Pal- 
 merston, and I know positively that some of his 
 colleagues are very deeply impressed by them. 
 Finally, if, contrary to all appearance, this combi- 
 nation should be realized, without doubt we should 
 sincerely lament it as the rupture of an alliance to 
 which we attach so much value; but we should 
 apprehend little from its immediate effects, because 
 a coalition contrary to the nature of things, and
 
 3G4 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 
 
 condemned beforehand, even in England, by public 
 opinion, would necessarily be tainted with impo- 
 tence." 
 
 Being instructed to deliver such a peremptory 
 answer to the concessional offers of the English 
 cabinet, General Sebastiani, on the 18th of October, 
 reported the result of his interview with Lord Pal- 
 merston in these terms : " I have laid before Lord 
 Palmerston your Excellency's communication. I 
 repeated all the considerations which deteniiine the 
 King's government to persist m its first resolutions 
 relative to the basis of the impending treaty between 
 the Sultan and Mehemet Ali. Lord Palmerston 
 listened to me mth the most earnest attention. When 
 I concluded, he replied in these plain words : ' I an- 
 nounce to you, in the name of the Council, that the 
 concession we had agreed to of a portion of the 
 pachalic of Acre is withdrawn.' I endeavoured to 
 resume the general question in debate; Lord Pal- 
 merston met me invariably by a polite but freezing 
 silence. I have repeated textually to your Excel- 
 lency the only words I could extract from him. My 
 efforts naturally ceased at the point wliich my own 
 personal dignity no longer suffered me to exceed." 
 
 Lord Pahnerston, in reality, felt little regret that 
 his offer of ceding the pachalic of Acre to Mehemet 
 Ali was not accepted by France. He had made it m 
 consideration of the anxiety of some of his colleagues 
 rather than of his own ^vill and with the desire of suc- 
 cess. Although he had rejected the first propositions 
 of the Kussian court as to the common action of the
 
 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 365 
 
 five powers in the East, his interviews with Baron de 
 Brunnow had given him confidence that the Northern 
 court would greatly extend its complaisance ; and he 
 did not deceive himself. M. de Brmniow, after de- 
 manding fresh instructions from St. Petersbourg, quit- 
 ted London towards the middle of October to return 
 to his post in Germany at Darmstadt; "I believe," 
 General Sebastiani wrote to Marshal Soult, on the 8 th 
 of October, 1839, " that he refrained from commencing 
 his journey suddenly, to avoid gi\Tng too much no- 
 toriety to the rejection of his proposals ; but I know 
 that he does not m the shghtest degree beguile him- 
 self as to the possibility of the adhesion of his court 
 to a common naval movement in the Bosphorus ; and 
 what proves it is, that he does not wait the answer 
 from St. Petersbourg to his last despatches." It was 
 General Sebastiani who deceived himself on the pro- 
 bable sense of that answer. It was fully conform- 
 able to the hopes of Lord Palmerston, and on the 
 6th of December, 1839, the French ambassador was 
 called upon to write to his government as follows : 
 " I forward without delay to your Excellency the 
 confidential information which Lord Palmerston has 
 just communicated to me, and which he only re- 
 ceived himself yesterday evening from the Russian 
 charo;e d'afi'aires. M. de Brunnow will return im- 
 mediately to England with full powers to ratify a 
 convention relative to the afiiiirs of the East. The 
 principle of the simultaneous admission of the allied 
 flags into the waters of Constantinople, or of their 
 general exclusion, will thus be formally decided. In
 
 3G6 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 
 
 case of interference, the number and force of the ships 
 admitted under each flag will be settled by a par- 
 ticular convention. The importance of this commu- 
 nication will impress on your Excellency the value I 
 attach to the most complete instructions and com- 
 mands." 
 
 The French cabinet felt surprised and disturbed. 
 It was not prepared to see Russia abandon so clearly 
 her pri\ileged position with Turkey, and so ready to 
 admit that French, English, and Austrian ships of 
 war should appear simultaneously with her OAvn m 
 the waters of Constantinople. She thus lost one of 
 her leading arguments agamst the ideas and plan of 
 Lord Palmerston. On the 9th of December, 1839, 
 Marshal Soult instructed General Sebastian! to con- 
 vey to the English government his satisfaction at the 
 unlooked-for concession of the court of Russia. " The 
 King's government," he said, " acknowledging, ^\ath 
 its accustomed loyalty, that a convention entered mto 
 on such bases would materially change the aspect of 
 affairs, would find in it a sufficient motive to recon- 
 sider the Eastern question, even with regard to the 
 pomts on which each of the powers seemed to have 
 formed its opinion so absolutely that prolonged debate 
 appeared impossible." But, at the same time that he 
 amiounced these conciliatory dispositions, the Duke 
 of Dahnatia evhiced much uneasmess as to the secret 
 motives which could have determined the court of 
 Russia to such a falsification of its policy, raising 
 doubts on the results Avliich Lord Palmerston pro- 
 mised himself; and some days after, returning to the
 
 THE EASTERN QUESTION. . 387 
 
 theme which he had ah'eady often availed himself of 
 to repulse the urgencies of the English cabinet while 
 exciting its suspicions, he wrote to General Sebas- 
 tiani : " I repeat to you that all these tactics resolve 
 themselves into two words ; Russia seeks to break up 
 the Anglo-French alliance, to which Europe owes for 
 ten years the preservation of peace. The cabmet of 
 London cannot fail to see this as clearly as we do ; 
 and as I am certam it would deplore such a result 
 equally with ourselves, as I feel convinced that result 
 could not be less injurious to England than to France, 
 I feel no hesitation in callmo; the most serious attention 
 of Lord Palmerston and his colleagues to the existing 
 state of thmgs." 
 
 This immovable position, this diplomatic monotony, 
 utterly ineffective m London, disturbed and wearied 
 the soundest politicians in the French cabinet, M. 
 Duchatel, M. Yillemain, M. Passy, and M. Dufaure. 
 They asked whether there were no means of trying 
 a new course, and of exercising more influence over 
 the ideas and proceedings of the English government. 
 They sympathised little with General Sebastiani. 
 From his antecedents he was looked upon as too 
 favourable to Turkey, and so nearly in accord with 
 the opmions of Lord Palmerston as to be ill fitted 
 for the strenuous support of opposite vievv^s. He 
 appeared to them to be neither a true representative 
 of the French government, nor an effective inter- 
 preter of the policy for which the recent debates in 
 our Chambers had established a predominance. I 
 had advocated that policy in the Chamber of Deputies ;
 
 368 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 
 
 I liad compared it with that of the other great powers, 
 particularly of England, applying myself to extract 
 from thence the general convenience of Europe. I 
 had repeated these words of Lord Chatham : " I argue 
 not with any one who tells me that the mamtenance 
 of the Ottoman empire is not, with England, a ques- 
 tion of life and death ; " and I added, with eagerness, 
 " As to myself, gentlemen, I am less timid. I do 
 not thhik that for such powers as England and France 
 there exist thus in the distance, and with certainty, 
 questions of life and death ; but Lord Chatham was 
 passionately impressed with the importance of main- 
 taining the Ottoman empire; and England still sides 
 so strongly with his opinion, that she devotes herself 
 to that cause, even, as I think, with a degree of 
 superstition. She has often shown herself hostile to 
 the new states that have been formed, or have tended 
 to form themselves, out of the natural dismemberments 
 of the Turkish sovereignty. Greece, for instance, 
 has not always found in England a friend; Egypt 
 still less so. I shall not enter into an examination 
 of the motives which, under such circumstances, have 
 influenced the English government. I believe that 
 it has sometimes deceived itself, and has sacrificed 
 great policy to small, the general and permanent 
 interests of Great Britain to secondary considerations. 
 The first of all British interests is, that Russia should 
 not predominate in the East. If I may be permitted 
 to express in this place an opinion on the policy of 
 a great foreign country, there is, I think, a degree of 
 weakness on the part of England in listening to
 
 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 369 
 
 jealous susceptibilities, or to any momentary commer- 
 cial interest, in place of employing all her efforts, all 
 lier influence, for the consolidation of those new and 
 independent states which may become, and ought to 
 become, effectual barriers ao;ainst the indefinite ao;- 
 grandizement of the only power whose rivalry in the 
 East England can have reason to apprehend." 
 
 In this language was perceived a real sympathy 
 with, and a firm mdependence towards the Englisli 
 policy, pledges of mutual understanding and resist- 
 ance, and perhaps also the chances of an effectual re- 
 sult. Parliamentary considerations combmed them- 
 selves with diplomatic motives. Present in the 
 Chamber, but not a member of the cabinet, I was to 
 the latter a source of uneasiness, if not of embarrass- 
 ment. I supported it loyally, but I had no share in 
 its responsibility. Absent from Paris, I should no 
 longer inconvenience it in the debates, while I should 
 become more closely associated with it. After coming 
 to an understanding with Marshal Soult and all their 
 colleagues, those amongst the ministers who were my 
 private friends asked me if I would accept the em- 
 bassy in London, and if the cabinet should make the 
 formal proposition to the King. 
 
 The proposal suited me. I foresaw that the forth- 
 coming session would be as embarrassing to myself on 
 account of the cabinet, as to the cabinet on my ac- 
 count. Its policy had been ineffective, and its posi- 
 tion was evidently precarious. By absence, I re- 
 moved myself from parliamentary intrigues and 
 struggles, and assumed an isolated position, at once 
 
 VOL. IV. B B
 
 370 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 
 
 friendly and independent. I shared, moreover, to a 
 certain extent, in the illusions of the partisans of 
 jMehemet Ali ; I believed in his power, in the dangers 
 which the peace of Europe might incur from his 
 obstinate resistance, and I thought it possible that, in 
 this respect, some influence might be exercised over 
 the ideas and resolutions of the English government. 
 Some months before, the mmisters, my friends, had 
 proposed to me the embassy to Constantinople, which 
 I formally declined; Constantinople removed me too 
 far from Paris, and involved me too directly in the 
 affairs of the East. London only connected me with 
 them remotely, and left me in close propinquity with 
 the affairs of Erance. I accej)ted the offer of the 
 cabinet. 
 
 King Louis-Philippe, in the first instance, objected 
 to it. He was much attached to General Sebastiani, 
 who had served hun zealously, from whom he ex- 
 pected an accordance, at once constant and enlight- 
 ened with his OAvn policy, and who, in London, was m 
 friendly relations with the English cabinet, and 
 especially ■with Lord Palmerston. The King felt 
 no want of confidence iii me, in my general views, 
 and in my firmness in sustaining them ; but I was a 
 man of the Chamber as well as of the govermnent; 
 I was anxious for the close union and concerted 
 action of the tribune and the cro^\ii; I had recently 
 taken a prominent part in the coalition : the Kmg knew 
 hoAv to lay his displeasures aside, but was unable to 
 forget them. He resisted for some time the proposal 
 oi the cabinet. Meanwhile, the position, externally
 
 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 371 
 
 and internally, became more and more urgent ; Russia 
 was gaining ground in London, yet the English 
 cabhiet still hesitated to separate itself openly from 
 France. It debated various projects of convention; 
 it declared that the presence of a Turkish plenipo- 
 tentiary was indispensable to the negotiation; it 
 evidently wished to gain time, and to leave a door 
 open to France. " I cannot persuade myself," said 
 Lord Palmerston to Baron de Bourqueney, " that we 
 shall be unable to re-establish concert between all 
 the great powers. I will accede to the most liberal 
 terms which according to my ideas can be possibly 
 granted to Mehemet Ali, to afford France a facility 
 of accepting the bases of the pending arrange- 
 ment." ^ Was it not an urgent matter to turn these 
 delays and doubts to advantage? The cabinet per- 
 sisted strenuously; even the ministers who were not 
 my personal friends, M. Dufaure amongst others, 
 declared themselves resolved to make my appoint- 
 ment a cabmet question. The King yielded. I had 
 several interviews with him. He received me with 
 a mixture of good-will and ill-humour, passing from 
 a token of confidence to a mark of displeasure. 
 " They are very exacting," he said to me one 
 morning; "but I understand the matter; people are 
 always glad to bestow an mcome of 300,000 livres on 
 a friend." " Sire," I replied, "my friends and I are 
 amongst those who would rather give than receive 
 an income of 300,000 livres." The question of the 
 
 " Despatches of the 28th of January and 21st of February, 
 1840.
 
 372 THE EASTERN QUESTION. 
 
 dotation of 500,000 livres per annum, demanded for 
 the Duke of Xemours, was then on the point of com- 
 ing on. The King smiled and resumed his temper. 
 On the 5th of February my appointment was signed 
 and published. Fifteen days later, the rejection of the 
 bill of dotation, mthout debate, placed the cabinet 
 in an extremely uncertain position, and I took my 
 departure for London on the 25th of Februaiy, 1840, 
 anxious to escape from the troubles, hesitations, prac- 
 tices, and attempts of the Chamber and the court, 
 which were on the point of displaying themselves.
 
 HISTOEIC DOCUMENTS 
 
 VOL. IV. C
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 No. I 
 
 (Page 26.) 
 
 The Duke de Broglle to the Marshal Marquis Maison, 
 Ambassador of France in Russia. 
 
 Paris, 28th Oct. 1833. 
 MONSIEUK LE MaEECHAL, 
 
 The government near which you are called to represent 
 the King's administration, is perhaps that whose relations 
 with France have been the most essentially changed by the 
 Revolution of July. 
 
 Before the events of 1830, France and Russia were united 
 in an alliance which seemed to draw closer from day to day. 
 This alliance, based on the strongest ties which can exist 
 between two States, a community of adversaries and a total 
 absence of all points of contact and motives for rivalry, had 
 resisted the utmost efforts of Austria for its dissolution. If 
 M. de Metternich had succeeded for the moment in throwing 
 coldness upon it by disquieting the Emperor Alexander as 
 to the strength and stability of our government, by making 
 him dread that, carried away by the revolutionary movement, 
 we might not be in a position to lend him profitable aid in 
 
 c c 2
 
 376 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 circumstances under which he might desire to rely on us, 
 these insinuations too lavishly offered had ended by losing 
 nearly all their effect. The Emperor Nicholas, who then 
 showed himself less suspicious, less impassioned than his 
 predecessor, and, above all, less governed by the theories of 
 absolutism, had moreover learned, in the midst of the embar- 
 rassments in which for a time the Turkish war had placed him, 
 the frankness and efficacy of our co-operation. This important 
 circumstance, even by having raised France from the inferiority 
 of position in which she had seen herself as regarded Eussia 
 since the events of 1814, and from having placed her in the 
 condition of exercising in her turn the character of protector 
 -towards that power, had given additional strength and solidity 
 to an alliance which, between two states of the first rank, 
 could, as was evident, only subsist on the footing of perfect 
 equality. 
 
 The Eevolution of July has completely changed this 
 position. 
 
 On the one hand, it has excited in several quarters, espe- 
 cially in Poland and in Belgium, questions in which the 
 inclinations and interests of the cabinet of St. Petersburg 
 have found themselves in absolute opposition to ours. On 
 the other, by a consequence less immediate, but which has 
 not delayed to develop itself, it has produced between France 
 and England a juxtaposition the simple fact of which would 
 have sufficed to modify the nature of our relations vnth the 
 court of Russia. Finally, this revolution, a powerful reaction 
 against the spirit of the treaties of 1815, and of the Holy Alli- 
 ance, or rather against the facts and doctrines which during ten 
 years have invested Russia with a sort of European dictatorship, 
 attacked, at the same time, that power in all the suscep- 
 tible points of its ambition and pride. Beyond all other 
 motives, perhaps this last suffices to inspire the Emperor 
 Nicholas and his subjects with a lively irritation against the 
 new order of things established in France.
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 377 
 
 More than once it has been thought that this feeling would 
 manifest itself by some sudden stroke ; those hostile aspira- 
 tions which the force of events alone has probably dissipated, 
 have formed besides an insurmountable barrier in the more 
 circumspect policy of Prussia and Austria. But the neces- 
 sity which thus restrained the unfriendly sentiments of the 
 sovereign of the North, from that cause alone increased their 
 bitterness and intensity. Every one knows how they came 
 to light on several occasions in proceedings which, while tibey 
 revealed the impotent rage of the cabinet of St. Petersburg, 
 fortunately wounded only its own dignity. 
 
 The position of the French embassy in Eussia became 
 therefore the more delicate, as in that country the higher 
 classes model their attitude and political impressions on those 
 of the sovereign. The King's representative found himself 
 everywhere exposed to difficulties and dangers which elsewhere 
 he would only have encountered at the court. I need not 
 remind you of the trials your predecessor had to undergo. 
 You know that, by a singular refinement, the Emperor 
 Nicholas, while loading the Duke of Treviso with personal 
 attentions ostensibly bestowed on his military reputation, 
 while at the same time affectedly abstaining from addressing 
 a single word to him in his diplomatic capacity, evidently 
 intended to demonstrate the coldness of the reception accorded 
 to the ambassador of the King of the French. 
 
 We have reason to think. Marshal, that you will not have 
 to submit to similar treatment. We find an unequivocal 
 guarantee on this point in the assurances, entirely spontaneous, 
 which the Russian government has at several intervals 
 transmitted to us of the satisfaction it feels at the selection 
 of the new representative of his Majesty, and of the eagerness 
 with which your arrival is expected. It would be difficult 
 not to see in these multiplied protestations a sort of honour- 
 able reparation for a proceeding the inconvenience of which 
 has at leng-th been undoubtedly acknowledged. 
 
 c c 3
 
 378 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 Be this as it may, if, notwithstanding- our anticipations, the 
 Emperor Nicholas should resume, as regards you, the attitude 
 he perseveringly maintained towards the Duke of Treviso, 
 he would thereby point out to you the course you should 
 adopt. Renouncing from that moment direct intercourse 
 with the Emperor, as inconsistent with the dignity of France, 
 and consequently with your o-svn, your duty then would con- 
 line itself to the discussion of such official matters with the 
 vice-chancellor as may be strictly required by the exigencies 
 of the service, and you will await further orders from the 
 King. 
 
 If it should happen, as we have no reason to foresee, since 
 this hypothesis has not been realized under circumstances 
 in which it seemed much less improbable, — if it should 
 happen, I sa}^, that the discontent of the Emperor Nicholas, 
 newly awakened by some fresh incident, should display itself 
 towards you by any more decided symptoms than coldness 
 and reserve ; — if, which seems to us impossible, he should 
 address words to you at which the King's government would 
 have a right to take offence, I need not tell you that, without 
 waiting an order of recall, you will at once demand your 
 passports and leave the direction of the embassy under a 
 charge d'affaires. But, I repeat, this painful supposition 
 wll not be realized. 
 
 I have pointed out to you the ground on which you are to 
 place yourself at St. Petersburg. I must now enter into 
 some details on the political relations of France and Russia. 
 
 In these latter days, the diplomacy of the two cabinets has 
 had few direct communications. In the ferment of spirits 
 it would have been too difficult to have come to a mutual 
 understanding. It was through the interposition of Prussia 
 and Austria, allies of Russia, but more calm and moderate, 
 that the varying incidents of the Hollandic-Eelgian affair 
 have been negotiated. As to the Greek question, become 
 entirely secondary since the Revolution of July, and in which.
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 379 
 
 in consequence of their antecedents, the cabinets of Vienna 
 and Berlin could not possibly interfere, it has gone on, in 
 some manner, at hazard. France and Russia, without mutual 
 concert or explanation, have not ceased their endeavours to 
 incline it towards their respective policy. The same has also 
 occurred more signally with respect to questions in which the 
 two courts were not naturally called upon to a common or 
 simultaneous action. 
 
 It would have been desirable, until more conciliatory 
 feelings had entirely replaced the irritation of the cabinet of 
 St. Petersburg, that the two powers should continue to abstain 
 from all immediate contact, too apt to awaken exasperated 
 feelings scarcely in a degree calmed down ; but to accomplish 
 this it would have been necessary that no important event 
 should place in collision their essential interests, and the 
 susceptibilities of their national pride. We could hardly 
 expect this at a time so fertile in sudden changes. 
 
 The events of the East added a new crisis to those which 
 already menaced the repose of Europe. The King's govern- 
 ment foresaw, at an early period, all the embarrassments and 
 dangers of which the contest between the Porte and Mehemet 
 Ali might furnish the principle. Solely occupied with the 
 desire of avoiding them, it has never ceased to employ, with 
 that view, its utmost influence at Alexandria and Constanti- 
 nople. To induce the Porte to concessions evidently indis- 
 pensable, and which, granted a little sooner, would have been 
 less onerous, — to restrain the Viceroy of Egypt, as much by 
 prudent representations as by an imposing display, — to 
 confine his demands within reasonable limits, — and to pacify 
 thus the Ottoman empire without incurring the risks of 
 foreign intervention: — such were the objects we avowed, and 
 in which we had the concurrence of England. This plan was 
 unquestionably the best in itself, and the most favourable 
 for the interest of Europe at large, which it rescued from 
 threatening complications ; and also for the advantage of the 
 
 c c 4
 
 380 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 Sultan, whom it presei-ved from the humiliation and perils 
 inseparable from the course into which he had suffered himself 
 to be drawn. 
 
 Unfortunately, Russia did not bring to this question views 
 of equal disinterestedness. She desired to profit by the 
 difficult position in which the Grand Seignor found himself, 
 and through the weakness of that unfortunate monarch to 
 transform into a species of sovereignty and protectorate the 
 preponderance she already exercised at Constantinople. Not 
 content with astonishing the world by the spectacle of a 
 Russian fleet and army introduced into the Bosphorus, and to 
 the very gates of Constantinople, under the pretext of afford- 
 ing Mahmoud the succour which did not ameliorate a single 
 condition of the peace, the Russian government, as if it had 
 resolved to brave the other powers, alarmed and uneasy at such 
 an unprecedented fact, thought to consecrate by a solemn 
 act the menacing position it had assumed ; and, at the moment 
 when consenting to withdraw its forces, compelled the Porte 
 to sign a treaty of alliance by which the latter formally bound 
 itself not only to become the enemy of all the foes of Russia, 
 but also to close the Dardanelles against foreign flags whenever 
 the cabinet of St. Petersburg should find itself engaged in 
 war. 
 
 We do not exaggerate to ourselves. Marshal, the bearing 
 of engagements subscribed to under such circumstances. 
 We recognize that intrinsically they are not of a nature to 
 produce much change in the state of things which has actually 
 existed since the last events. But it seems to us evident 
 that the cabinet of St. Petersburg has wished to proclaim 
 openly in the face of Europe, to establish as a principle of 
 public law, exclusive and exceptional preponderance in the 
 affairs of the Ottoman empire. By this provocation, the in- 
 fallible effects of which, we are strongly disposed to think had 
 not been well calculated, we were forced to emerge from the 
 reserve within which, from views of conciliation, we had
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 381 
 
 consented to restrain ourselves up to that time. We found 
 it necessary, in concert with England, to protest against the 
 consequences of a treaty which tended to change, with- 
 out our participation, the relations of the powers in the 
 East ; and a declaration to this effect, a copy of which I sub- 
 join, has been transmitted first to the Porte, and subsequently 
 to the cabinet of St. Petersburg. < 
 
 We cannot yet learn how it will be received by the Impe- 
 rial Grovernment. Perhaps it may consider its dignity in- 
 volved in preserving, on this subject, absolute silence ; and 
 in that case you will only have to follow its example. If, on 
 the contrary, it should indulge in recriminations, the state- 
 ment I have here drawn up will place you in a condition to 
 reply in terms which, as you will readily understand, ought 
 to be, at the same time, firm, moderate, and exempt from all 
 bitterness and irritation. You might add that we have no idea 
 of contesting with Kussia the high influence appertaining to 
 her in the affairs of the Porte, and which results from the force 
 of events. But to seek to convert that influence into an in- 
 strument of exclusion and injury against other states is to call 
 for and necessitate, on their part, the most just and energetic 
 opposition. However serious and difiicult the Eastern ques- 
 tion may be, it is not, nevertheless, the most delicate of those 
 which have sprung up, within the last three years, between 
 France and Eussia. The subject of Poland has, in a very 
 different manner, contributed to divide the two nations, and to 
 exasperate the Emperor Nicholas against us. I shall not 
 recapitulate these sad details. You know the reserve we never 
 ceased to exercise in a matter to which it was impossible for 
 us to remain indifferent. While the contest was still pend- 
 ing, that reserve was naturally suggested to us by the promises 
 of moderation and clemency which M. de Mortemart had re- 
 ceived. After the fall of Warsaw and a fatal experience had 
 compelled us to acknowledge that our intercession in favour 
 of the unhappy Poles served only to enhance the resentment
 
 382 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 of an implacable victor, we felt that a duty of humanity pre- 
 scribed to us, for the moment, a most painful silence. We 
 should have continued to preserve it if the cabinet of St. 
 Petersburg had not, some time since, indulged in the unfor- 
 timate suggestion of inserting in its official " Gazette " an 
 article the object of which was to present the question of 
 the existence of Poland as placed beyond general policy, and 
 subjected exclusively to the will of Kussia. Not to have dis- 
 puted such an assertion would have been to admit it on our 
 own account. We found it necessary to take it up in a semi- 
 official publication, the irrefragable arguments of which 
 you may develop if, which is unlikely, the discussion should 
 be pressed upon you. 
 
 It only remains for me, JNIarshal, in concluding, and in 
 recapitulating your instructions, to explain to you, in a few 
 words, the aspect under which we regard our futui'e relations 
 with Russia. Your judicious apprehension will easily deduce 
 from thence the rules of conduct you have to follow, accord- 
 ing to the conjunctures in the midst of which you will find 
 yourself. 
 
 Without undervaluing the advantages which, at another 
 epoch, the intimate alliance of the cabinet of St. Peters- 
 burg afforded to us, we understand perfectly that, under ex- 
 isting circumstances, not only is it impossible to re-establish 
 it, but that there would even be a dangerous blindness in 
 seeming to desire it, and to direct the combinations of our 
 policy ostensibly towards that end. Invincible obstacles at 
 present oppose themselves to a close union, which otherwise 
 would be without object between two cabinets whose ten- 
 dencies have no longer anything in common. As, notwith- 
 standing this, a future, more or less nearly connected with 
 both, may give rise to questions in which it would be equally 
 the interest of France and Russia to concert and mutually 
 understand each other, we ought, without affectation, and 
 without lending ourselves to advances which might possibly be
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 383 
 
 turned against us, to endeavour to replace ourselves in those 
 friendly relations, at least aj)parent, with the Eussian govern- 
 ment, which do not invariably end in a complete reconcilia- 
 tion, but which, when such an event is destined to take place, 
 infallibly precede it. It is nearly on this footing that we at 
 present stand with Prussia and Austria. Our only desirable 
 point at this moment is to reach the same position with 
 regard to Eussia, and this is the result which the King's 
 government recommends to jowr enlightened zeal.
 
 384 
 
 No. n. 
 
 (Page 63.) 
 
 il/. Mignet to the Duke cle Broglie. 
 
 3Iadnd, Oct. 12ih, 1833. 
 My Lord Duke, 
 
 I hasten to inform you of the first results of the mission 
 with which the King's government has charged me, and to 
 communicate the information I have collected since my 
 arrival here. 
 
 I reached Madrid on the morning of the 10th. I was 
 delayed some hours at Vittoria, where a popular insurrection 
 in favour of Don Carlos had just burst forth. The royalist 
 volunteers held military possession of that city, and debated 
 as to whether they should allow me to pass. The fear of 
 offending France, whose determinations they were yet un- 
 acquainted with, undoubtedly decided them to permit me to 
 continue my journey. I had learned at Bayonne the revolt 
 of Bilbao, and the bad feeling in the Basque Provinces. These 
 dispositions are generally participated in all the countries 
 bordering on our frontier. Without customs, almost without 
 imposts, denuded of garrisons, except on a few military 
 points, and enjoying many privileges to which they perti- 
 naciously cling, these countries seem to me opposed to every 
 kind of innovation from self-interest. 
 
 The absence of knowledge and the want of commerce, 
 except on the coast of Catalonia, strengthen their estrange- 
 ment from all that might change their condition. From
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 385 
 
 Vittoria I passed through nothing but tranquil districts, and 
 they continue so to this moment. 
 
 On my arrival I waited on the Count de Rayneval. The 
 uncertainty in which he had been left as to the part which 
 France intended to take relative to the Spanish succession 
 had kept him entirely inactive since the death of King Fer- 
 dinand. I acquainted him with the resolutions of the King's 
 government, and I was happy to find that they accorded with 
 his own views, The despatch which you received from him 
 immediately after my departure will have apprised you that 
 in the various courses to be selected in this weighty con- 
 juncture, M. de Eayneval confined himself strictly to that 
 which has been adopted by the government. I have detailed 
 to him the motives which have determined the King and his 
 council to sacrifice the Salic law to that which formerly regu- 
 lated the succession to the Spanish monarchy. France has 
 always had, and will continue to have, the strongest desire 
 to secure her rear in Europe by causing Spain to adopt, and 
 by supporting that country in the maintenance of her own 
 systems. She cannot make front to the north but by resting on 
 the Pyrenees as a secure base. The intervention of Louis XIV., 
 and that of Napoleon in the Peninsula, resulted from this per- 
 manent necessity of France. The Salic law represented under 
 the old monarchy the alliance of the two countries which the 
 dynasty of Napoleon was destined to represent under the 
 Empire. To-day the interest is the same, and in the com- 
 petition of two dynasties, one of which, founded on a 
 system contrary to ours, enters into the Northern alliance, 
 and makes the Peninsula the head-quarters of the malcon- 
 tents and conspirators of France, while the other relies on 
 our friendship, rejects our adversaries, and is inevitably 
 called to follow our directions, — the King's government is 
 bound to declare for the latter. The female succession has 
 become (for France), under existing circumstances, what in 
 other times and positions the Salic law had been. These
 
 386 HISTORIC D(3CUMENTS. 
 
 arguments had impressed themselves on the Count de Kay- 
 neval, who warmly approves the resolution of the govern- 
 ment. 
 
 The end being fixed, nothing remained but the course to 
 follow, which was equally pointed out by your despatch and by 
 the oral instructions you delivered to me. To acknowledge, 
 sustain, and direct this government ; — such, summarily, is the 
 policy of France, and the duties imposed on her ambassador. 
 M. de Rayneval has found the plan as sound as the object. 
 
 To fulfil the first part of the intentions of our government, 
 he hastened, on the day of my arrival, to present himself to 
 M. de Zea and to the Queen Eegent. He announced to 
 them that France recognized the young Queen, and ofiered to 
 support her. This intelligence was received with extreme 
 joy, emotion, and gratitude. As M. de Rayneval will un- 
 doubtedl}^, in his despatch of this day, give you an account of 
 his conference with the Queen, I shall enter into no details 
 on that subject. The Spanish government has hastened to 
 make them known through the " Madrid Gazette," which 
 you will receive with our despatches, expecting to find in 
 this publicity an accession of strengifh. It does not seem to 
 me to reject the idea of recurring to the assistance of France, 
 should circumstances render it desirable, and this is an even- 
 tuality for which minds are preparing themselves. The 
 French government should also prepare itself, determine its 
 resolutions on this point, and arrange its resources. Let us 
 now estimate, as far as I can judge, the actual position of 
 the government which the interest and inclination of France 
 incline her to support. 
 
 This government has in its favour a fact, powerful in all 
 countries, and which seems to be additionally so with a 
 nation accustomed to obedience and slow in its determina- 
 tions. • It is an administration composed of the Queen's 
 partisans, of loyal captains-general, with finances in a tole- 
 rably flourishing state, an army well commanded, better dis-
 
 HISTOKIC DOCUMENTS. 387 
 
 ciplined than it has been for a long time, in which there has 
 been no defection, and the fidelity and co-operation of which 
 appear to be secured. It has also the Liberal party, which 
 has no hope but in the triumph of that cause. This party 
 predominates on the coast and in the greater part of the 
 commercial towns, but is not numerous in the interior of the 
 country. Finally, it has in its favour the limited capacity of 
 Don Carlos, with the fear inspired by his wife, the people he 
 has about him, and the tribunal of the Inquisition. 
 
 But it has against it the clergy, forming a compact or- 
 ganization which continues to exercise a powerful influence 
 over the masses, and, with very few exceptions, is favourable 
 to Don Carlos ; the corps of royalist volunteers, who, inferior 
 in discipline and arms to the regular troops, are much more 
 nmnerous, and scattered over the entire surface of the 
 country ; the democratic spirit of particular localities, which 
 is the opposite of liberalism, and dreads reforms as abolition 
 of privileges ; and the popularity of the infant Don Carlos, 
 who, in the eyes of a people with all the nationality of isola- 
 tion, represents the country, while the Queen Kegent has to 
 struggle with the disadvantage of being a foreigner. 
 
 With such formidable enemies to confront, the government 
 and the Queen's party require the closest unanimity. Un- 
 happily there is already division amongst them. The Council 
 of Eegency has a more liberal bias than the ministry, and 
 according to all appearance they are not likely to work to- 
 gether. The Queen, who at this moment acts under the 
 advice of M. de Zea, is, it is said, on cold terms with her sis- 
 ter ; and M. de Zea has estranged the Liberals by his mani- 
 festo of the 4th of October. This want of harmony under 
 such pressing circumstances presents an unfavourable augury. 
 M. de Zea governs alone since the accession of the young 
 Queen, as he did during the last six months of the reign of 
 Ferdinand. He has superior qualities and high reputation in 
 the opinion of everybody ; courage, firmness, and rare activity.
 
 388 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 But he is perhaps wanting in the prudence and address de- 
 manded by such a complicated position. He seems to rely ex- 
 clusively on authority. He is generally reproached with having 
 unnecessarily alienated the Liberals, if not by granting them 
 nothing at present, at least by leaving them no hope for the 
 future; and with having compromised the Queen by inducing 
 her to abandon those who had declared in her favour. In 
 acting thus, his object appears to have been to retain the 
 confidence of the purely royalist party, by re-assuring it 
 as to the maintenance of unlimited power and individual 
 privileges. He has thought that the absolutists, confirmed 
 in their interests and opinions, would contest ^^ath less 
 ardour the cause of Don Carlos, thus rendered more personal 
 and less political. Has he deceived himself? This, time will 
 speedily show ; and this is what we may apprehend from the 
 insurrectionary movements at Bilbao, Vittoria, Talavera, and 
 Logrono on the Ebro. But, be this as it may, all agree in 
 looking upon him as the only man capable, by his firmness, 
 of establishing the Queen's authority, always provided that 
 he does not fail in handling it adroitly when confirmed. The 
 Liberals have no one of equal vigour to face immediate diffi- 
 culties, and who could advantageously replace him for the 
 interest of the Queen and of France. 
 
 As the energy of the first minister and the support of the 
 Liberals are equally essential to the Queen's cause, I deemed 
 it proper to name conciliation to M. de Zea in the interview 
 I had with him yesterday. M. de Zea volunteered to me his 
 confession of faith in regard to parties, as he has done on 
 several occasions to M. de Rayneval. He spoke with deeply- 
 rooted animosity against the Carlists. He said they had 
 raised the banner of revolt, but that his arm was long and 
 strong enough to seize and beat it down ; that it would then 
 be seen whether he feared or was able to manage them ; that 
 he knew his country, and what would be the influence over it 
 of a good cause, and firm resolution; that in 1824, despite
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 389 
 
 the urgency of the clergy, and against the advice of all his 
 colleagues, he had dared to attack the inquisition directly in 
 face, and had overthrown it; that he gloried in this, and in 
 the credit he now assumed of having done more than any 
 one else to secure the throne to the young Queen, by remov- 
 ing the obstacles to her accession (the Princess of Beira and 
 the infant Don Carlos), and by giving her certain supports in 
 the oaths of the Cortes, and the organization of a strong mini- 
 stry and a loyal army ; that the cause to which he had devoted 
 himself was that of the nation and of justice ; that the Queen 
 Eegent had resolved to transmit the trust of royal power to 
 her daughter, intact, as she had received it ; that Spain was 
 not sufficiently advanced to support another form of authority ; 
 that the Queen and her government were nevertheless far 
 removed from being friends to superstition and darkness; 
 that they rejected both, and sought, on the contrary, to 
 enlighten and improve their country; that this was their 
 constant thought, and would evince itself as soon as the 
 commotions were put down, and legislature could supersede 
 contest. As to the Liberals, he declared that he desired no 
 better than to come to a friendly understanding with those 
 amongst them who were not animated by the spirit of faction ; 
 that there were many of them reasonable men, who would 
 associate with him in defending the Queen's rights, and were 
 readily employed ; that, in short, he opened his arms to all 
 who presented themselves in sincerity. While developing 
 his system and intentions, which I here recapitulate, he 
 repeated several times that he piqued himself on yielding to 
 no Spaniard in conviction and loyalty, but that he was still 
 liable to error, and was anxious, above all things, to profit by 
 the counsels of those who tendered proofs of so much friendly 
 interest in the authority of his sovereign. 
 
 Although it may be difficult to deal with a mind so strongly 
 prepossessed, I thought it right to enter on the reasons 
 which rendered the union of the different partisans of the 
 
 VOL. IV. D D
 
 390 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 Queen most desirable. Mr. Villiers, who had seen M. de Zea 
 before my interview with him, has informed me that he spoke 
 to him in a similar strain, and that it is possible this common 
 language of those who interest themselves most in the Queen's 
 government may induce M. de Zea, by his future acts and 
 selections, to diminish the impressions produced by his mani- 
 festo. He has commissioned me to make kno^vn to my 
 government his own good intentions, and the unqualified 
 gratitude of the Eegent. That Princess, to whom I had the 
 honour of being presented to-day by M. de Eayneval, and 
 of placing in her hands the letter intrusted to me by the 
 Queen her aunt, repeated to me personally the same senti- 
 ments towards their majesties, and appeared to be much 
 affected by those which I conveyed to her on their part. 
 
 She received me graciously, as did the two Infantas, to 
 whom I also delivered the letters and compliments of the 
 Queen. There was no allusion to public affairs, and indeed 
 there could be none in these court audiences, which the 
 ambassador may repeat, although I cannot. 
 
 The situation of Spain to-day is much less encouraging 
 than that of Portugal, and on this subject, my Lord Duke, I 
 abstain from speaking, as M. de Eayneval will include it in 
 his despatch. It is impossible at present to conjecture the 
 result. The extent to which the Carlist insurrection may 
 spread is unknown, or whether the vigour of the first minister, 
 who has sent troops to repress it in the north of the Penin- 
 sula, where it has already intercepted the principal high 
 road of communication with the continent, will be seconded 
 by forces sufficient to assm-e a triumph. The presence of Don 
 Carlos on the Spanish territory would enormously increase 
 his chances. It is not exactly known where he is, since he 
 left Santarem to approach Spain in the character of Pretender 
 to the throne. 
 
 A report is circulated that the insurgent Biscayans have 
 invited him to join them. It will, however, soon be ascer-
 
 HISTOEIC DOCUMENTS. 391 
 
 tained what has become of him, and at the same time an 
 estimate formed of the strength of the opposing parties. 
 Meanwhile France should prepare herself to maintain her 
 interests, and the resolutions which the King's government 
 may consider it proper to adopt. 
 
 I believe that my presence here, now that the impulse has 
 been given and received, will be less profitable than it might 
 be in Paris, where I could enter more fully into the details 
 of information which are never sufl&ciently conveyed in formal 
 despatches. 
 
 Our government has here an able representative, full of 
 the resources, intelligence, and penetration which are in- 
 dispensable in a land of intrigue ; one who possesses much 
 experience, and an intimate knowledge of the Peninsula, is 
 well looked upon, well informed, in perfect understanding 
 with Mr. Villiers on all points, and entering warmly into the 
 plan adopted by the council, — a plan to the execution of 
 which he desires to devote himself, and is bent on rendering 
 successful. 
 
 I conclude my over-long letter, in praying you, my Lord 
 Duke, to accept the assurance of my high consideration and 
 respectful attachment. 
 
 (Signed) MiGNET. 
 
 DD 2
 
 392 
 
 No. III. 
 
 (Page 76.) 
 The Duke cle Broglie to the Count de Rayneval. 
 
 Jan. m?i, 1834. 
 
 It is unnecessary for me to tell you that the situation of 
 Spain has been for a long time the object of our most anxious 
 solicitude. We say it with regret, that she seems herself to 
 aggravate it greatly. It is not in the attempts of Don Carlos's 
 party that we see the principal and immediate source of the 
 dano-ers which threaten the Peninsula and the throne of 
 Queen Isabella ; that party has proved that, left to itself, its 
 chances of success are few, and the errors and disagreements 
 of the Queen's partisans can alone improve them. Un- 
 fortunately, these divisions, instead of diminishing, have 
 become more serious every day, and nothing indicates that 
 the course pursued by the ministry of the Kegent is likely 
 to lead to their termination. M. de Zea, confident in the 
 sincerity of his intentions and the frequently successful 
 courage which he has at such extremely varying periods 
 opposed to the efforts of the factious, persists, almost alone, 
 in the system he proclaimed on his accession to power, 
 and at the moment of the late King's death. He does not 
 abandon the idea of improving the civil government and 
 legislation of Spain ; he labours for this object with surprising 
 activity ; but determined to preserve to the royal authority 
 the independence which he considers necessary to its bene-
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 393 
 
 ficial action, he wishes it to rely solely on itself, and to 
 abstain from all engagements ; that in accepting the co-opera- 
 tion of loyal and enlightened men, it should yield no conces- 
 sion of principles to the opinions of which they are the 
 representatives. 
 
 On the other hand, the adversaries of M. de Zea fand we 
 must recollect they form an immense majority amongst the 
 partisans of the Queen), even those who are not led away either 
 by a revolutionary tendency, or a purely theoretical bias, 
 refuse to recognize a pledge for the future prosperity of their 
 country in reforms established by a simple act of arbitrary 
 power, and which another act of the same kind might 
 speedily revoke; they believe that these reforms have no 
 real value, and could inspire no just confidence unless they 
 are guaranteed in some specific form by the consent of the 
 nation : in fine, they are convinced that this consent would 
 give a support to the Queen's authority far more solid than 
 that which it can find in titles importunately contested. 
 We are not now called upon to decide between these 
 views. An exact knowledge of the state of minds in Spain 
 could alone have placed us in a condition to distinguish 
 which of the two is founded on truth ; and at our distance 
 from the theatre of events we must wait until enlightened 
 by facts. You know, moreover, with what religious anxiety 
 we have avoided any step that might lead to a suspicion of 
 our being disposed to mix ourselves up with the internal 
 government of Spain. A feeling of delicacy, which M. de 
 Zea has undoubtedly appreciated, has compelled us to push 
 this reserve even to a scruple, at a moment when the neces- 
 sity, on the part of the Queen's government, of requiring our 
 aid, might have apparently given to our representations a 
 totally different character from that of simple advice. I will 
 not conceal from you that this consideration alone sufficed 
 to prevent us from expressing, at the time, the regret we 
 felt for an act which the enemies of M. de Zea have since 
 
 DD 3
 
 394 niSTOEic documents. 
 
 turned into such a powerful weapon against him, — his noto- 
 rious manifesto of the 4th of October. We also feared, by 
 the slightest indications of censure, to encourage adversaries, 
 or to diminish the means of success to a minister we never 
 ceased to hold in the highest esteem ; and being resolved to 
 excite no obstacles in his path, we have not hesitated, on our 
 own account, to endure the mischievous consequences of the 
 passive and expectant attitude to which we resigned our- 
 selves. We have allowed the opinion to gain ground, in 
 France as well as in Spain, that not only did the King's go- 
 vernment employ its entire credit with the Queen to main- 
 tain M. de Zea in power, but that it also attaches to that 
 support the condition of setting aside all constitutional 
 enactments and liberal innovations. I repeat, that we neither 
 desired to interfere gratuitously in the internal affairs of 
 Spain, nor to offer any obstacle to the realization of a system 
 in which such a man as ]\I. de Zea declared that he saw the 
 only prospect of safety for the country. Meanwhile events 
 have advanced, and they are of a nature to make us appre- 
 hend that M. de Zea has not thoroughly estimated the 
 necessities of the actual condition of Spain. If, until now, 
 he has succeeded in keeping the government isolated from 
 all parties and opinions, we believe that the regency has 
 rather drawn from that isolation a principle of weakness than 
 of real independence. The choice it has made, the mea- 
 sures it has necessarily decreed, and which might have won 
 popularity if the whole character of its proceedings had indi- 
 cated the result of a system, have produced no other effect 
 than that of conveying (erroneously, without doubt) an ap- 
 pearance of inconsistency, and of yielding up to the enemies 
 of the ministry important positions, whence they may, in 
 future, direct their attacks with more efficacy. The party 
 which calls for reforms, convinced that those hitherto ob- 
 tained have been reluctantly yielded under the plea of 
 concession, and that the slightest pretext would be taken for
 
 HISTOEIC DOCUMENTS. 395 
 
 retracting them, far from finding therein a motive for rally- 
 ing round the first depositaries of power, seeks only with 
 augmented ardour to overthrow them, because these very 
 reforms supply an index of their weakness. Even some of 
 the men called to the most important posts, convinced that 
 they owe their appointment solely to the irresistible empire of 
 public opinion, second more or less the efforts of the opposi- 
 tion. 
 
 The royal authority thus progressively weakens itself. 
 The measures which ought to strengthen lead to its ruin, 
 because it is placed in a false position. Anarchy reigns in 
 all minds, and begins even to mingle with the acts of power, 
 which, disarming itself by degrees, without allaying the discon- 
 tents and exigencies by which it is weakened, will, in all pro- 
 bability, be at last reduced to the point of no longer being 
 able to deny to force the concessions which it considers in- 
 compatible with its safety. 
 
 A catastrophe appears to be imminent. It is impossible 
 that so clear a mind as that of M. de Zea can deceive itself 
 on this point ; and however convinced he might be, at another 
 time, of the soundness of the system to which he has linked his 
 name, and of the perils attending any combinations founded 
 on other principles, we should find it difficult to persuade 
 ourselves that he will wish singly to persevere in a struggle so 
 unequal, a struggle which his courage might still prolong, 
 but in which he would ultimately fall, and in which, perhaps 
 (and this consideration ought pre-eminently to move a heart 
 like his), he would not fall alone. We admit, readily, that 
 an accommodation, at the point matters have now reached, 
 may present important obstacles, and that it may even give 
 rise to real dangers ; but in that course the dangers are only 
 possible, in any other they are certain. A choice must be made. 
 In such a state of things M. de Zea has necessarily traced out 
 for himself a plan of conduct. He cannot have contemplated 
 abandoning the destinies of his country to the hazard, or, to 
 
 D D 4
 
 39G HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 speak more correctly, to the certainties of a desperate combat. 
 The interests of Spain are, in these days, too closely united 
 to those of France to permit us to remain indifferent to the 
 future which prepares itself for that country ; and we should 
 be guilty towards France herself were we not to exert our 
 utmost efforts to avert the misfortunes which menace our 
 neighbours. It is in the name of these common interests. 
 Count, and in that of the kind feeling which the King has 
 ever cherished for his august niece, that you will invite M. 
 de Zea to communicate to you his views and projects. Frank 
 and complete explanations, such as may be expected from a 
 man equally well known for his rectitude and firmness, 
 we absolutely require. They alone can determine our doubts, 
 and prescribe to us the course we have to follow in our rela- 
 tions with Spain. I expect them with impatience.
 
 397 
 
 No. ly. 
 
 (Page 83.) 
 The Duke de Broglie to the Count de Rayneval. 
 
 March ISth, 1834. 
 
 I cannot conceal from you that the intelligence from Spain 
 produces a most painful impression on the King's govern- 
 ment, and that the situation of that country has been the 
 object of the most serious deliberations of the council. 
 
 I need not repeat the lively interest manifested by France, 
 from the first moment, for the consolidation of Queen Isa- 
 bella's throne. On the day when we learned the death of 
 Ferdinand VII. we hastened to recognize the authority of 
 the Eegent. We did more ; we offered her our support, not 
 indeed with the idea of sustaining against the wishes of the 
 Spanish nation an authority they might desire to reject, but 
 to give to that power which we thus thought, and still think, 
 based upon the leading moral forces and most honourable 
 influences of the country, the time necessary to organize and 
 place itself in a condition to sustain the struggle against a 
 faction which, during twelve years of almost absolute rule, 
 had possessed every means of preparing itself for the combat. 
 
 Far from wishing to impose upon Spain a government 
 chosen by us, our sole thought has been to secure to the 
 sound national majority, the possibility of unfettered mani- 
 festation. We judged, moreover, that by the position and
 
 398 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 antecedents of the men who had avowed themselves its 
 defenders, the Queen's government would naturally find it- 
 self disposed to recall Spain to paths of improvement, 
 progress, and salutary reform ; and assuredly this expec- 
 tation contributed not a little to the promptitude with 
 which we declared in its favour. But, penetrated with 
 the most profound respect for the independence of nations, 
 we have sedulously avoided, at the moment when the po- 
 sition of that government might render our aid so precious, 
 all that might lead to a belief that we attached to it con- 
 ditions relating to the forms of its internal system : we 
 abstained for a long time, as you are well aware, from offering 
 on this point, and in this sense, the slightest official advice. 
 
 Such were our scruples that we even refrained from ex- 
 pressing any opinion on the manifesto on the 4th of October, 
 by which the ministers of the Kegent proclaimed their 
 determination to maintain absolute power, while, at the same 
 time, they announced measures of clemency and adminis- 
 trative reform. Nevertheless, we foresaw from that moment, 
 that this imprudent declaration would become the germ of 
 mistrust and suspicion amongst the Queen's friends ; that it 
 would entail the fall of its authors ; and that, as it would be 
 impossible to carry out its principles, — authority, by thus 
 compelling itself to make a retrog-rade movement, would find 
 that it had struck a first and fatal blow against that sponta- 
 neity of action so invaluable to it in epochs of political 
 regeneration. 
 
 Our expectations, unfortunately, were soon verified. 
 
 Loud complaints resounded in opposition to the system 
 recently announced. The Regent was in no condition to 
 impose silence on an opinion from whence her entire strength 
 was derived. She persuaded herself that, in default of 
 political institutions, it might be satisfied by concessions of 
 another character. 
 
 Undoubtedly, it would be unjust to deny all the good
 
 mSTOEIC DOCUMENTS. 399 
 
 which the Eegent has already done. The recall of the 
 exiles, the termination of proscriptions, the admission to 
 public employment of all that Spain contains of able and 
 honourable men, the creation of a civil legislature so long 
 desired, the important reforms introduced into the organi- 
 zation of the tribunals : — - all these measures, and others in 
 addition, which Queen Christina has carried through in the 
 space of a few weeks, would have sufficed in ordinary times to 
 render beneficent and illustrious a long reign. 
 
 If, under existing circumstances, they have passed almost 
 without notice, it is that public opinion believed itself en- 
 titled to expect something better, and that taught by long 
 experience to dread the uncertainties and variations of 
 absolute power, it was not disposed to place much confidence 
 in partial amendments, — the fruit of a generous impulse, 
 and a pressure of circumstances which might disappear, 
 before fresh combinations. It is, in fine, that in the eyes of 
 the men who have, until now, supported the regency, the only 
 complete and enduring reform, the only one which could 
 place all others on a solid basis, and assure them a sufficient 
 guarantee, is the establishment of a representative system. 
 
 The natural results of this fatal discord between the 
 system adopted by the regency, and the almost unanimous 
 conviction of its adherents, speedily manifested themselves. 
 
 To the anxious welcome with which it was at first hailed, 
 has succeeded a feeling of suspicion, undoubtedly unjust, 
 but extremely difficult to assuage. Authority has lost its 
 action. Even at Madrid, its orders are with difficulty exe- 
 cuted. In the provinces, the captains-general most devoted 
 to the Queen's cause, have found it necessary for her service, 
 and not to exasperate the disturbed and discontented popu- 
 lations, to act, in a manner, independently, and to pay no 
 attention to the instructions they receive. 
 
 Encouraged by these symptoms of weakness and anarchy, 
 the partisans of the Pretender raise their heads. In the
 
 400 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 districts from whence they have never been completely ex- 
 pelled, they increase in number and audacity. Their pro- 
 gress even threatens to extend to points where, at the outset, 
 their attempts failed. 
 
 To contend against their numerous bands, to accomplish 
 their extinction, the army, despite its loyalty, is evidently 
 too weak, and the exhausted state of the treasury, unfor- 
 tunately, does not permit the frame-work to reach the 
 necessary expansion. An energetic union of the Queen's 
 friends could alone supply this deficiency. It is enough to 
 say how much we deplore the causes which, up to this 
 moment, have rendered this union impossible, and which, 
 detaching towards other prepossessions the thoughts and 
 efforts of the constitutionalists, have left the field open to 
 their bitterest enemies. 
 
 . We had reason to think, for the last two months, that 
 these causes were about to disappear. When the Regent, 
 yielding to an imperious necessity, determined to dismiss 
 M. de Zea, when she called to her councils men whose names 
 awakened powerful sympathies, the enthusiasm and hopes 
 which then displayed themselves seemed to restore to power 
 all its moral strength. 
 
 Unhappily these sentiments, which attached themselves 
 even less to the persons of the new ministers than to the idea 
 of which they were looked upon as representatives, were soon 
 suffered to waste away. When days, weeks, and whole 
 months passed on, and no official manifestation announced to 
 Spain an actual change of system, astonishment sprang up at 
 these delays and this silence. Fears arose that all was to be 
 again placed in question. Injurious suspicions pervaded 
 the public mind, and the accusations that resounded assumed 
 a more serious character than those which had within two 
 months displaced M. de Zea. At that period, in fact, the 
 attack was confined to the ministry, to which was imputed the 
 only obstacle which shackled the benevolent and liberal action
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 401 
 
 of an august mil. To-day — I speak it with sorrow — cora- 
 plaints are directed against a higher source. 
 
 The evil I am now pointing out is great indeed ; it may 
 become irreparable if suffered to increase. 
 
 It would be vain to expect that public impatience could 
 be calmed by these ameliorations of detail, and by reforms 
 similar to those I have now recapitulated. Such means, 
 which were unsuccessful when hearts were less open to hope, 
 must fail completely at the present crisis. Uneasy and sus- 
 picious as minds now are, they would see in concessions thus 
 successively yielded, nothing but artifices intended to abuse 
 them. Far from feeling the slightest gratitude, they would 
 irritate themselves more and more with what they would 
 interpret as a fresh symptom of fear and bad faith. Eoyalty 
 would become weaker through its own benefactions, and when 
 finally determined to enter on a new course, would cease to 
 retain the strength necessary to follow it to a successful end. 
 Perseverance in such a system would be to accelerate its own 
 ruin, and to expose itself gratuitously to great dangers which 
 may yet be avoided. 
 
 Let the Eegent then hasten to escape from the false posi- 
 tion in which she finds herself involved; let her adopt, 
 finally, a plan of conduct calculated to settle all these doubts, 
 to rally round her all reasonable spirits, and to secure to the 
 government the confidence it so imperatively needs. Perhaps 
 it still preserves the requisite authority for decreeing firmly 
 and maturely, according to the inspirations of prudence, the 
 changes to be effected in the institutions of the country. A 
 little later, this liberty may escape from it, and public 
 opinion, more exacting as it becomes more suspicious, would 
 impose its own law. New delays, instead of diminishing the 
 difficulties which press so exclusively, would serve only to 
 aggravate them. These difficulties, besides, are more for- 
 midable than the Spanish government appears disposed to 
 consider them. It is, unquestionably, an arduous as well as
 
 402 HISTORIC DOCUIMENTS. 
 
 a great and noble task to regenerate a nation by modifying 
 its legislature. But we believe that the dangers of such an 
 enterprise are singularly exaggerated when an attempt is 
 made to confound the present epoch mth former ones, the 
 conditions of which were absolutely different, — those of 1812 
 and 1820. 
 
 In the first place, sufficient regard is not paid to the dis- 
 position of minds. In 1812 and 1820, ideas of innovation 
 existed only in a small number of heads who ill comprehended 
 them, exaggerated them in consequence, and with this dan- 
 gerous prepossession gave themselves up to the most unlimited 
 utopianisms. 
 
 To-day the so-called party of reform has been instructed 
 by the experience of its errors and the misfortunes to which 
 they have led. By becoming moderate, and by rejecting 
 impracticable theories, it has fortified itself with the adhesion 
 of a great number of men whom its extravagance alone had 
 estranged. It is now at once active and more numerous : its 
 moral and material strength have increased together. 
 
 In 1812 the monarchy was absent; in 1820 it was van- 
 quished and captive. All was carried on without it, in spite 
 of it, against it, because there was a rooted determination to 
 consider it hostile to liberty, and a predominant dread of 
 placing it in a position to overthrow the constitution. 
 
 There is nothing similar in the situation of the existing 
 government. Far from being considered as the natural ad- 
 versary of reform and rational liberty, every one knows that 
 their causes are inseparably united ; that it will fall with 
 them ; that it has itself taken the initiative in ameliorations : 
 all, notwithstanding the suspicions which begin to break 
 forth, are disposed to leave to it this free action. Nothing 
 is required but increased activity. 
 
 We find here. Count, great advantages and a vast superi- 
 ority of position. Eoyalty has never ceased to be powerful in 
 Spain, more so, perhaps, than in any other part of Europe ; it
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 403 
 
 is therefore called upon to yield something to the general 
 movement of the human mind, and to seek new supports in 
 place of those which time has broken. But these supports 
 would become useful and effective instruments when accepted 
 with frankness and without mental reservation. It is not in 
 Spain that monarchy has to fear abolition. For a long time 
 to come the Spanish people will see in their sovereigns the 
 direct representatives of divinity ; for a long time they will 
 be the objects of a kind of worship which could not be 
 attacked with impunity; and if, under the late reigns, this 
 enthusiastic sentiment has appeared to suffer a momentary 
 check, it is because the princes to whom it was applied 
 have seemed to forget that such homage rendered by a nation 
 so noble, demands in return from him who receives it, not 
 only generous and warm-hearted feelings, but requires 
 to be encouraged by external evidences of that simple and 
 exalted majesty, those rigid habits, perhaps verging on 
 austerity, which in former ages have characterised the most 
 illustrious predecessors of Queen Isabella. 
 
 I have now explained to your Excellency the aspect in 
 which we regard the actual condition of Spain. You have been 
 already instructed several times to speak in this sense to the 
 Regent's ministers. It is now the intention of the King and 
 his council that you should communicate directly with her 
 Catholic Majesty, to whose reading you may even submit the 
 present despatch. The Queen will undoubtedly recognize 
 in such a step a new pledge of the tender affection of which 
 the King, her uncle, has already given her so many proofs, an 
 additional evidence of the friendly sentiments which have so 
 long united France and Spain, rendered still more ardent 
 by recent events which have blended the interests of the two 
 states. She will understand how weighty existing circum- 
 stances appear to us, when the French government, so 
 careful of non-interference in the internal affairs of other 
 nations, has ventured to tender such pressing advice to Spain.
 
 404 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 The considerations you are instructed to lay before her 
 Catholic Majesty are those which we believe the best calcu- 
 lated to make an impression upon her heart, because they 
 are drawn from the internal state, and in accordance with 
 the wishes and wants of a people whose happiness is confided 
 to her care. We might add, that in the interest even of the 
 respect which Spain has a right to claim from foreign govern- 
 ments, the close of that system of temporization to which 
 she is now subjected will be a wise and well-combined 
 measure. 
 
 It would be fruitless, in dispute of this assumption, to 
 allege the little sympathy of some of those governments 
 with the principles laid down by the partisans of the Eegent ; 
 it is not the less true that they look upon Spain, at present, 
 as forced by her position to admit at least a portion of those 
 principles ; and that the power of the Eegent will continue to 
 retain, in their eyes, a provisional character, up to the period 
 when it must submit to that condition of its existence. It is, 
 therefore, certain, that the Spanish government, from the 
 moment when it thus determines, will acquire more strength, 
 and inspire more confidence, not only in its allies, but even 
 with the states by which it is as yet unrecognised. 
 
 2. Tlce Same to the Same. 
 
 March l^h, 1834. 
 
 The King has judged it proper to prescribe to you, under 
 existing circumstances, a direct communication with Queen 
 Christina. His Majesty thinks the time has come for 
 making known openly to that Princess the impression with 
 which we regard the situation of Spain, and our judgment 
 on the course her government has pursued to this day. But 
 in a despatch intended to be placed under the eyes of the 
 Kegent, it was impossible to include certain considerations, 
 to describe particular views, without weakening the character
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 405 
 
 of a communication made in the King's own name. We, 
 therefore, feel the propriety of leaving it to you to make 
 a verbal exposition to Queen Christina of many observa- 
 tions and counsels, the effect of which may be the more 
 impressive as being laid before her in the freedom of a con- 
 fidential interview. It is thus, for instance, that in dis- 
 cussing the question of the Coi'tes, you will not omit to 
 introduce the importance of offering, in the mode of forming 
 the national representation, and particularly in the constitu- 
 tion of the higher Chamber, those guarantees of legal and 
 regular independence, no less essential to the stability of 
 the throne of the young Queen Isabella, than conformable 
 with the principles of a wise and true liberty in the kingdom. 
 On this point our opinion is known to you ; you will, there- 
 fore, create the opportunity of imparting it to the Eegent. 
 You will equally have to show her how important it is that 
 power should be composed of elements perfectly homogeneous. 
 Until now, the composition of the cabinet has not presented 
 this accordance of principles, this identity of views, without 
 which, authority, divided and tortured into opposing interpre- 
 tations, can have neither strength nor consideration. I shall 
 not enlarge farther on this subject ; your reports satisfy me 
 that there is no occasion to suggest to you the arguments 
 and opinions which we desire to impress on the attention of 
 Queen Christina, 
 
 In conclusion, it is not our wish that you should maintain 
 any mystery with M. de la Eosa as to the general character 
 and spirit of the step which the King prescribes to you. 
 
 VOL. IV. E E
 
 406 
 
 No. Y. 
 
 (Page 110.) 
 TJie Duke de Broglle to the Count de Rayneval. 
 
 Count, Paris, 23rd 3fmj, 1835. 
 
 I have received the despatches you have done me 
 the honour to write, up to No. 32 inchisive. The King's 
 government has learnt, with a sentiment of much pain, the 
 disorders which agitated INIadrid on the day of the 11th inst., 
 and which have again called forth the courage and self-pos- 
 session of M. Martinez de la Eosa. 
 
 It was easy to foresee that the late events in Navarre, by de- 
 ceivint' the hopes which had been founded on General Valdes 
 for the conclusion of the civil war, would augment in Spain 
 the number of advocates for French intervention. Minds 
 are naturally led, when difficult circumstances continue, to 
 adopt the means which promise the readiest termination, 
 ^vithout troubling themselves much as to the inconveniences 
 they produce in other respects. What most surprises us is 
 that men so enlightened as the Eegent's ministers should 
 suffer themselves to be led to participate in this impression. 
 
 I am disinclined at present to decide absolutely on the 
 question of intervention ; it has not been formally proposed, 
 and consequently the council has not been called upon to 
 discuss it. If it should present itself hereafter, our determi- 
 nation would be guided by an estimate of the circumstances 
 which have rise to it ; but without anticipating eventualities.
 
 HISTOEIC DOCUMENTS. 407 
 
 I feel it my duty, at present, to direct your attention to the 
 serious objections which such a measure would excite. 
 
 The Eegent's ministers cannot be ignorant how unpopular 
 the idea of intervention is in France. Without speaking of 
 the obstacles it would encounter from the passions of the 
 different parties, the mass of the nation, prepossessed with 
 unfortunate reminiscences, would only recognise in it an 
 opportunity for new expences and inextricable embarrass- 
 ments ; and the King's government, supposing it possible not 
 to regard this repugnance, would incur a responsibility the 
 more onerous that it would have no confidence in the success 
 of the enterprise for which it would consent to the risk. 
 
 In England, a serious opposition of a totally different 
 character would be declared against the march of a French 
 army beyond the Pyrenees. Nothing, perhaps, would be 
 better calculated to revive the old national jealousies. The 
 ministry in office, whatever might be its personal dispositions, 
 would see itself compelled to adopt the public sentiment, 
 and if disposed to resist it, it is more than probable that the 
 weak majority on which it relies would speedily give way ; 
 that an administration taken from other ranks would come 
 into power ; and to obey the impulse which had carried it 
 there, would commence by breaking the salutary alliance 
 which at this moment unites England to France and Spain. 
 
 It is not less evident that the other powers would regard 
 this intervention with at least equal displeasure ; and without 
 openly resenting it, would strive to embarrass us in the com- 
 plications which the general position of Europe might easily 
 originate. Undoubtedly this consideration would not of itself 
 restrain us, but, combined with all those I have pointed out, 
 it has also a certain weight. 
 
 I need not add that the intervention condemned in France 
 and England by public opinion, and rejected in the rest of 
 Europe by the policy of the cabinets, would find in Spain 
 itself a number of opponents ; that it would take, in appear- 
 
 E E 2
 
 408 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 ance, from the Queen's government the character of nation- 
 ality, which is the first of moral forces; and that, on the con- 
 trary, it would strengthen the party of Don Carlos, by 
 supplying it with an opportunity of presenting itself as the 
 defender of the independence of the country. 
 
 An absolute necessity alone could explain why the Spanish 
 cabinet shoidd determine to brave such consequences by 
 calling in the aid of a French army. If it had lost all hope 
 of pacifying Navarre through its own efforts; if it had reason 
 to believe its existence threatened by the progress of the 
 insurrection, we might then understand that in despair of 
 the cause it would be driven to appeal to such an extreme 
 resource. Fortunately, matters are far removed from that 
 emergency. 
 
 The Queen's authority has not ceased to be acknowledged 
 throughout nearly the whole monarchy. Almost everywhere 
 the attempts in favour of the Pretender have been vigorously 
 put down. Some small mountainous districts alone, situated 
 at one extremity of the Peninsula, have been able until now, 
 omng to the difficulties of the ground and the well-known 
 energy of the inhabitants, to maintain themselves in a state of 
 revolt which applies more to particular and local grievances 
 than to the common interests of the country at large. A skilful 
 leader has there united, independently of the volunteers who 
 casually swell his numbers, ten or twelve thousand men, 
 organized with some degree of regularity, although badly 
 armed; he has also at his disposal two hundred horses and 
 nine pieces of cannon. 
 
 With this force, and relying, moreover, on the sympathies of 
 the population, he has, up to this period, been able to repulse 
 the attacks of more numerous troops, but chiefly composed 
 of young, inexperienced soldiers, engaged in positions where 
 numbers are of little importance, and cavalry and artillery are 
 almost useless. But it is evident that were he to emerge from 
 his mountains, he would lose the advantages from which he
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 409 
 
 derives superiority, and that he would find himself abandoned 
 by the greater portion of his companions in arms : the Navar- 
 rese and Biscayans in particular, exclusively attached to their 
 soil and institutions, and accustomed from time immemorial to 
 consider themselves a distinct people from the rest of Spain, 
 would certainly refuse to fight at a distance from their homes, 
 for a cause which could no longer be that of their franchises 
 and privileges. 
 
 Zumalacarreguy, even if so disposed, would fail to draw 
 them to Castille; and he is not likely to form such a wish; for 
 he well understands that in the midst of the vast plains which 
 cover that country, his hopes of success would be materially 
 diminished. 
 
 The insurrection in Navarre and Biscay, therefore, has 
 nothing in it which directly threatens the throne of Queen 
 Isabella. Undoubtedly, by the moral effect it produces 
 throughout Spain, it constitutes a danger I do not pretend 
 to disavow ; it keeps up a baneful agitation ; it revives the 
 hopes of parties, and their dependence on the chances of events. 
 It is both important and pressing to bring it to an end : but 
 once more, the state of things does not assume the character 
 of that desperate urgency which no longer permits a choice 
 of means ; and the despondency which might induce the 
 Queen's government to proclaim its own impotence by a de- 
 mand for our intervention would in no manner be justified. 
 
 We are certainly not inclined to refuse the assistance and 
 succour which we are able to afford, without compromising 
 at once ourselves and our allies. Between an armed inter- 
 ference and what we have already done, there are intermediate 
 steps which might reconcile many difficulties. It belongs not 
 to the King's government to point these out to the cabinet 
 of Madrid ; we might be erroneous judges of what the neces- 
 sities of the position require and admit. But if, laying aside 
 all notions of direct intervention, which nothing could sanction 
 at this moment, the Spanish ministry were to apply to us 
 
 E E 3
 
 410 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 with confidence to take part in its views and exigencies, if it 
 would indicate what it thinks we could effect, the question 
 would present itself under a totally different aspect. What 
 we ask of it, above all, is not to take from the cause of the 
 young Queen the features of independence and nationality ; 
 and that the employment of the resources which the govern- 
 ment may obtain from its allies should be directed by none 
 but Spanish hands. 
 
 Whatever may be the propositions which Spain might 
 judge fitting to be made to us, it would be essential that she 
 should communicate them at the same time to the other two 
 powers who took part in the treaty of the 22nd of April, and 
 that in some degree she should also obtain their concurrence, 
 or, at least, that of England; All that tends to place beyond 
 doubt the maintenance of that treaty, and to connect with it 
 the consequences of the measures that might be adopted, 
 would be sound policy. The reasons are so evident that I do 
 not think it necessary to detail them. 
 
 2. The Duke de Broglie to the Count de Eayneval. 
 
 Count, Paris, July \Uh, 1835. 
 
 I have received the despatches you have done me the 
 honour to write under the dates of the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd of 
 July. 
 
 The King's government sees with regret that at Madrid an 
 erroneous idea is still entertained of the nature of the motives 
 which have induced us to refuse direct intervention in the 
 affairs of Spain. Owing to a false interpretation of the terms in 
 which that refusal was expressed, they seem resolved to look 
 upon it as merely a provisional adjournment. They appear to 
 think that a closer investigation of the state of the Peninsula, 
 and more pressing instances on the part of the Spanish
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 411 
 
 cabinet, would induce us, in the actual state of things, to 
 rescind our determination. 
 
 This is a mistake which it becomes important to rectify. 
 Undoubtedly, the King's government does not propose to 
 establish the absolute doctrine of non-intervention in all 
 cases whatever. It has no desire to lay down in principle 
 that there might not have been and never may be circum- 
 stances in which intervention would be reciprocally advanta- 
 geous to France and Spain, and therefore legitimate. It is 
 ^for the reservation of eventualities, entirely hypothetical, 
 that we have given our refusal the circumspection which 
 has deceived the Spanish cabinet. But such has been our 
 only object; and it would be a great mistake to apply in any 
 other sense the expressions we have used. 
 
 It is necessary that this should be clearly understood. 
 Before pausing on the resolution adopted, we had carefully 
 examined all sides of the question. We calculated every 
 possible and probable chance, and it is only after the ma- 
 turest deliberation that our choice has bounded itself by the 
 measure which we consider, not exempt from all serious in- 
 conveniences, but subjected to less weighty objections than 
 any of the others proposed. 
 
 It would, therefore, be useless, by any considerations of 
 detail, drawn from the particular position of the Spanish 
 government, to attempt to shake our decision. Besides 
 that such considerations change nothing in the nature of the 
 question, and that they merge more or less in those which 
 have already been presented to us, they could not, evidently, 
 prevail against motives founded on the most essential in- 
 terests of France. 
 
 Any fresh insistance on this point would therefore be worse 
 than futile. All that tends to prolong the illusion of the 
 Spanish government, and induces it to make new efforts with 
 this object, could have no other result than to induce mutually 
 unpleasant explanations, and at the same time to impress on 
 
 E E 4
 
 412 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 its proceedings the imcertainty so strongly calculated to 
 paralyze all vigorous determination ; to prevent it from 
 employing with advantage the real resources of which it can 
 dispose, as well as those we offer, and to retain it in the 
 deceitful expectations of an assistance it cannot receive. 
 
 It rests with you. Count, to call back the cabinet of Ma- 
 drid to a more just appreciation of the true state of things. 
 I cannot too strongly recommend you to use your utmost 
 efforts to effect this object.
 
 413 
 
 No. YL 
 
 (Page 127.) 
 To M. Guizot, Deputy, Paris. 
 
 Sir, Algiers, 3Iay 27th, 1836. 
 
 The colonists of Algeria remember with gratitude that 
 during the dangers which last year so formidably threatened 
 their existence, your credit and the power of your eloquence 
 decided the success of their cause, which you identified with 
 that of France. They then devoted themselves to their 
 labours, animated by hope, the nourisher of new-born esta- 
 blishments, and the only incentive that can promote the 
 entire development of colonization. When, subsequently, 
 between the interval of the two sessions, the adversaries of 
 the colony announced fresh hostilities, our confidence in the 
 interest you had evinced prevented us at first from enter- 
 taining serious alarm. Moreover, how could we persuade 
 ourselves that after the solemn recognition of our possessions 
 in Africa, they would, in the following year, renew the 
 attacks against which a colony more securely established 
 than ours would find it difiicult to oppose efifectual defence ? 
 Despite our hopes, we are again compelled to combat, and 
 we have recourse to our former defenders. The Colonial 
 Society, whose solicitude extends to everything which involves 
 the general interest, is too strongly impressed with the influ- 
 ence of your advocacy, not to intreat you to repeat in the 
 tribune the arguments of reason and experience, which from 
 your lips have already obtained such signal success in our
 
 414 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 favour. Our gratitude and acknowledgments will be but 
 feeble returns for all we owe you ; but the glory of bringing 
 triumph to a cause so dear to the country and to humanity, 
 is a noble and estimable reward, sufficient to satisfy great 
 minds, and which men of elevated thought have ever desired 
 to win. 
 
 We have the honour to forward to you such details as we 
 have been able to collect on the progress of the colony, 
 convinced that your ability will induce a conviction of their 
 value, and that the vote of the Chamber, while dissipating 
 our apprehensions, will consolidate our future, and afford 
 you an additional triumph. 
 
 i Deign to accept, Sir, the assurance of our highest con- 
 sideration. 
 
 FiLHON, President. 
 
 EosEY, Vice-President. 
 
 Ch. Solvet, Vice-President. 
 
 2. Tlie Same to the Same. 
 
 Sir, Algiers, June 2dth, 1836. 
 
 In the debate in the Chamber of Deputies which determines, 
 as we hope at least, the fate of the colony of Algiers, and 
 attaches it irrevocably to the mother-country, your speeches, 
 equally wise and benevolent, have convinced us that we had 
 good reason to found our hope on your patriotism and elo- 
 quence. With such an ally we are henceforward confident of 
 the future. The Colonial Society, powerfully moved at the 
 news of the success of the cause of Algeria, forgets not to whom 
 it owes its triumph, and hastens to offer you the testimony of 
 its gratitude. It takes pride in enumerating you amongst 
 the firmest supporters of a colony, the importance of which
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 415 
 
 to France and to humanity you have so completely re- 
 cognised. 
 
 Deign, Sir, to accept the assurance of our highest con- 
 sideration. The President of the Colonial Society, 
 
 FiLHON. 
 
 EosEY, First Vice-President. 
 SoLVET, Vice-President.
 
 416 
 
 No. YII. 
 
 (Page 141.) 
 Account of the Abbey of Val-Richer. 
 
 (Taken from the History of the Diocese of Bayeux, by M. Hermant, 
 parisli priest of Saint PieiTe de M.albot : a -work commenced in 1705, and 
 ended in 1726. It fonns three vohimes in folio, the first of which only 
 has been printed ; the second and third, in mannscript, are in the library 
 of Caen.) 
 
 " The church of Val-Eicher can boast that, under the rule 
 of Abbot Eobert, the first of that name, Thomas-a-Becket, 
 Archbishop of Canterbury and Chancellor of England (who 
 received the crown of martyrdom in 1170), when flying from 
 the anger of his Prince, sought refuge there for a con- 
 siderable time, wearing the habit of the Cistercians, which he 
 had received from the hands of the sovereign pontiff; oc- 
 cupying himself, like the other monks, in prayer, in manual 
 labour, in vigils, and in all the painful exercises of peniten- 
 tial and monastic life. They even preserved there the sacred 
 ornaments he was accustomed to use in the holy sacrifice of 
 the mass, as precious relics ; but they were despoiled by the 
 barbarities which the Calvinists exercised in 1562 on all that 
 was worthy of respect and veneration. The spot is still shown 
 in a small wood adjoining the abbey, where he often retired 
 to occupy himself in the contemplation of heavenly matters."
 
 417 
 
 No. VIIL 
 
 (Page 148.) 
 
 1. The Minister of Foreign Affairs to the Count de 
 Rayneval at Madrid. 
 
 Count,' Paris, December 12th, 1835. 
 
 I see by your despatch of the 4th of December, No. 96, 
 that M. de Mendizabal was on the eve of concludinor with Mr. 
 Yilliers a treaty of commerce, and that the greater part of 
 the articles were already drawn up. On this occasion you 
 ask me to acquaint you immediately with the intentions of 
 the King's government. I shall without delay forward to you 
 detailed instructions on the subject. But it appears to me 
 that in the mean time you can positively demand from M. de 
 Mendizabal (with reservation), the clause in our treaties with 
 Spain, which assures to us the treatment of the most favoured 
 nation. This clause is formal and peremptory, and gives us 
 the right of openly claiming for ourselves all the advantages 
 which may be awarded to England in the convention of 
 which you have apprised me. Accept, &c. 
 
 2. The Minister of Foreign Affairs, to the Count de 
 Rayneval, at Madrid. 
 
 Count, Paris, Decemler l^th, 1835, 
 
 I have received the despatches you have done me the 
 honour to write, up to No. 98 inclusive. 
 
 The King's government gives the fullest approbation to
 
 418 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 the measure you have adopted to prevent French interests 
 from being- injured by the arrangements in negotiation 
 between Spain and England. You have well understood that 
 to prevent such an untoward result, it would not suffice to 
 associate ourselves, after the treaties which secure to us the 
 privileges of the most favoured nation, with the stipulations 
 accorded to England ; that thus an apparent equality could, 
 in fact, be nothing more than the most absolute inequality ; 
 and that this hypothesis would become, for instance, a reality 
 in cases where a reduction of duties would bear on produce 
 belonging exclusively, or only partially, to British nianu- 
 facture. Such reductions ought evidently to be Jsalanced by 
 others, of which French merchandize would be the object in 
 turn. I am led to believe that such is the sense of the 
 promise contained in M. de Mendizabal's note, and my 
 answer conveys this to him. In fact, it would be an insult 
 to his loyalty to suppose that, under the appearance of a 
 declaration satisfactory to us, he has simply accorded a 
 guarantee absolutely deceptive, and so much the more su- 
 perfluous that, as I have just remarked, it is explicitly con- 
 tained in the treaties which give us a right to demand the 
 usage of the most favoured nation. 
 
 I am far, moreover, from thinking that this is an oppor- 
 tune moment for concluding the commercial negotiations 
 entered upon at Madrid. The simple fact of their existence 
 has already given, in France, an unfavourable confirmation 
 to the opinion, which, from the first moment, represented 
 M. de Mendizabal as inclined to rely on the support of 
 England, and to direct all his combinations with this ten- 
 dency. The only method of gradually doing away with these 
 impressions, would be to abandon altogether the negotia- 
 tions in question. It will be fruitless to say that when ter- 
 minated, their result will dissipate uneasiness, and tran- 
 quillize suspicions, by proving that they have been conducted 
 in a spirit equally favourable to all the allies of Spain.
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 419 
 
 Whatever may be the result, whatever care may be taken to 
 establish in the modifications introduced into the tariff of 
 customs, an equal balance between English and French 
 interests, this equality will not be sufficiently evident to 
 prevent complaint on the part of those on either side, who, 
 right or wrong, would believe themselves injured. We may 
 be sure that our southern departments, which already submit 
 impatiently to the sacrifices imposed on their commerce by 
 the aid we lend to the cause of Queen Isabella, would 
 eagerly receive the reports spread by malevolence or pre- 
 judice as to the damage, perhaps imaginary, of which these 
 innovations would become, in their eyes, the source. The 
 animated disputes already excited in our journals of the 
 South by the imprudent as well as unjust recriminations 
 indulged in at IMadrid, against the pretended facilities ac- 
 corded to smuggling in favour of Don Carlos, would speedily 
 assume an additional character of violence. More than ever 
 the King's government would be accused, in that particular, 
 of sacrificing the commerce of France to that of England, 
 by attaching itself too scrupulously to the observance of the 
 clauses in the convention of the 22nd of April, and the 
 additional articles ; and perhaps would soon find itself in- 
 capable of resisting demands which would base themselves, 
 in part at least, on the wounded sentirhent of national 
 pride ; it might even be constrained, if not to abandon, at 
 least to modify, the line of conduct, which its sincere attach- 
 ment to the cause of the Queen has, up to this period, en- 
 abled it to follow in the midst of so many difficulties. 
 
 It is for M. Mendizabal to judge whether it is desir- 
 able to provoke such eventualities by measures which the 
 interest of Spain assuredly does not call for at this moment, 
 and which that of England may the more readily permit 
 to be postponed in the present state of the Peninsula, as 
 the scale of customs, whatever may be its proscriptions, 
 opposes no very formidable barriers to the movements
 
 420 IIISTOrvIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 of commerce. I beg you will draw the attention of the 
 minister to this point. Eepeat to him emphatically that 
 he would vainly flatter himself with the hope of obviating 
 the inconveniencies I have pointed out, by granting us 
 advantages equal to those conceded to England. Such an 
 equality not being capable of mathematical demonstration, 
 the blindness of passions and interests would ever be pre- 
 pared to deny it
 
 421 
 
 No. IX. 
 
 (Page 179.) 
 
 Speech of M. Ouizot, Minister of Public Affairs, on the 
 reopening of the Lectures of the Noimial School. 
 
 Gentlemen, Paris, Oct 21st, 1836. 
 
 After the flattering Report which has just been read, I have 
 only to congratulate myself and you on the state of the 
 school. 
 
 In every department, both as regards discipline and study, 
 progress, gradually more marked during six years, is newly 
 confirmed and developed. I have no encouragement higher 
 than this to offer you. Such a well-merited result is a re- 
 compence for the noblest efforts. Your present life, gentle- 
 men, is extremely toilsome ; your labours are silent and 
 almost obscure ; but your future is full of greatness. Yes, 
 gentlemen, of greatness ; I use the word designedly. A 
 double career awaits you. On leaving this school you will 
 proceed to teach in our establishments of public instruction 
 what you learn here to-day ; and you will not only teach, 
 but you will do so in the name of the state, appointed by it, 
 and holding from that source your mission. This principle, 
 on which the existence even of the University is based, will 
 take root and extend itself more and more in our institutions 
 and our laws. It presides at present over the whole system 
 of elementary instruction. It is consecrated and explained 
 in the new propositions of which secondary education has 
 
 VOL. IV. F F
 
 422 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 already been made the object. It will obtain, I feel confi- 
 dent, in our plan of superior teaching, the same place and 
 the same empire. It alone can establish truly national edu- 
 cation, real public instruction, while, at the same time, it 
 harmonizes wonderfully with the rights of liberty. You will 
 speak and act, gentlemen, in the name of this principle, and 
 your presence will infuse into it the authority, stability, and 
 dignity which emanate from public power, and expand over 
 all who speak and act as its representatives. 
 
 This is not all, gentlemen, neither does teaching include your 
 whole career. To you also, to a certain extent, the state confides 
 the disinterested culture of letters, science, philosophy, history, 
 of all branches of intellectual activity. You are not alone 
 charged to distribute, through instruction, the riches already 
 acquired by the human mind : you are called to increase them. 
 Those great literary and scientific works, that continued 
 search after truih, which formerly occupied so many learned 
 societies, so many illustrious corporations, to-day especially 
 belong to you; — you are appointed to gather in this noble 
 inheritance. In the midst of the perpetually increasing 
 empire of special destinations and professions which charac- 
 terizes our modern society, your particular avocation is intellec- 
 tual life, the pure love and free culture of truth and knowledge. 
 Their future conquests belong to your domain, as well as 
 the direction of those which they possess already. There are, 
 I know not how many unknown glories awaiting you, and 
 these, I feel assured, you will take possession of, for France 
 and for yourselves. 
 
 Have no doubt on the question, gentlemen. This double 
 object of your existence, this double career opened before 
 you, will extend from day to day your own importance and 
 that of the school. The actual modesty of your lives and 
 labours will not extinguish their importance. Eemain 
 modest, and, nevertheless, confident in your destiny. Enter- 
 tain wise pretensions and elevated thoughts ; you have a right
 
 HISTOEIC DOCUIVIENTS, 423 
 
 to do so. I cannot take upon myself to guarantee the ac- 
 complishment of the legitimate desires of your honourable 
 principal for the distinct, definitive, and adequate establish- 
 of this great seminary ; but I shall devote myself to it with my 
 utmost power ; and be assured that sooner or later you will 
 obtain it. The Normal School will take too strong a hold in 
 France, for France to abstain from giving it on our soil and 
 in our streets the position it requires. 
 
 FF 2
 
 424 
 
 No. X. 
 
 (Page 196.) 
 General Count cle Damremont to M. Guizot. 
 
 , ,^. . dlarseilles, Dec. 10th, 18SG. 
 
 Sir and jMinister, 
 
 1 have forwarded an account to the government of the 
 
 mission I undertook by its order, to Marshal Clauzel ; but 
 
 the particular interest you evinced in that mission, which 
 
 you were kind enough to impart to me at the moment of my 
 
 taking leave, and which you also entertain for the fate of our 
 
 possessions in Africa, make it my duty to communicate to 
 
 you directly the results of my voyage to Algeria. I am, 
 
 moreover, encouraged by the kindness with which you have 
 
 always received my remarks on the questions connected with 
 
 this important subject. 
 
 You have, without doubt, been made acquainted with my 
 reports to the minister of War. I have drawn up, as far as 
 depended on myself and my position allowed, an exact 
 description of the state of affairs ; and as that state is partly 
 to be ascribed to the system hitherto adopted, and partly to 
 the men who exercise it, I have found it necessary to speak 
 ec|ually of persons and things. This duty has been frequently 
 a painful one, for there were sad revelations to be made. 
 
 Moreover, I have said little that was not known before. 
 Public notoriety had quite recognised these imputations, 
 more or less precise in character ; and in the greater number
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS- 425 
 
 of cases I have only added a more direct and authentic testi- 
 mony to those already supplied. 
 
 You will appreciate the motives which, even with you, and 
 in this entirely confidential communication, restrain me 
 from pressing on details of a certain order, to occupy myself 
 exclusively with the system adopted in Africa, and with that 
 which it would be desirable to substitute in this place. 
 
 I have already had the honour to lay before you my ideas 
 on this point, and the satisfaction of finding that they met 
 your approbation and were entirely in conformity with your 
 own personal views. All that I have seen and heard in 
 Africa, all that I have been able to collect, has served only 
 to confirm and render more profound my conviction that the 
 only system capable of producing fruits is that of a restrained, 
 progressive occupation, pacific in its spirit, such as you have 
 so well conceived and repeatedly proclaimed in the Chambers. 
 
 To establish ourselves first at Algiers, and on the most im- 
 portant points of the coast or territory ; to select those points 
 sparingly, following the nature and configuration of the 
 ground they command, and the facilities of defending and 
 cultivating them, such as Algiers and Bona ; or being guided 
 by their topographical position, if favourable to relations with 
 the interior of the country, and to the influences desirable to 
 create and exercise them, as at Oran ; to settle in these 
 localities firmly, powerfully, and permanently, and to convert 
 each into an essential French territory. 
 
 To open to colonization all that can be protected, but 
 effectually and continually protected ; to attract capital and 
 industry by the most infallible of all encouragements, the 
 most powerful of guarantees, — material security; to create 
 populations of European race, connected with us by blood 
 and community of interest ; to make these populations centres 
 of power, and by and by of wealth, on which we may found 
 and at all times rest our action over the remainder of the 
 country. 
 
 FF 3
 
 426 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 Through these, to form amicable relations with the indi- 
 genous inhabitants, purchase their commodities, and stimulate 
 them to exertion by opening a market to their produce ; to 
 incline them to labour by the allurement of profit to which 
 they are extremely sensible ; to attach them to the soil by 
 proprietorship and material interests ; to see them, under the 
 spur of these interests, mingle with us, improve their cultiva- 
 tion, their habits, and their industry, in imitation of ours ; to 
 impregnate them gradually with our customs, manners, and 
 civilization ; and to lead them to submit themselves to us, as 
 much from their own wants as from a dread of our power. 
 
 To join thus agricultural colonization, where it can be esta- 
 blished under assured protection, to commercial colonization 
 in all quarters where the inhabitants are willing to barter their 
 goods for ours ; to reconcile the conquered with the conquering 
 population, by giving them the means of living side by side in 
 the interchange of mutual services : — such is a summary of 
 this system which, in my opinion, is founded on a correct esti- 
 mate of things as they exist, and which, to ensure success, 
 requires application, consistency, and steady perseverance. 
 
 Thus conceived, the occupation may be accomplished with 
 the means which the Chambers seem resolved to devote to 
 that object. As economy is a primary advantage, it is also 
 one wliicn escapes the discussions invariably attendant on a 
 demand for fresh sacrifices, and which incessantly hold the 
 fate of the colony in a precarious condition. 
 
 We shall only occupy what we can keep and defend. But 
 by proportioning the occupation to the forces we may have at 
 disposal, and by concentrating those forces on the small num- 
 ber of fixed points, on those points we shall be masters. On 
 all the others we shall act and influence by information, 
 exercised with care, in turning to advantage the numerous 
 divisions amongst the indigenous septs, and the frequent 
 rivalries between the chiefs ; by means of temptation judi- 
 ciously employed ; and, if necessary, by force of arms.
 
 HISTORIC DOCmiENTS. 427 
 
 confined, of course, to the most serious cases, when 
 the question may be to chastise a hostile or to protect a 
 friendly tribe. But by no longer carrying on a war of con- 
 quest, the occasions for an appeal to force will be rare, and 
 when we hold the natives by the bonds of their material inte- 
 rests, we shall retain a powerful means of action ; and a simple 
 threat to break off mutual relations and close our markets 
 would keep them in a state of wholesome apprehension. 
 
 Meanwhile, our establishment in Africa will take root in 
 the soil ; it will assume a fixed character, and will produce 
 within an approximate time substantial results, the reward 
 and absolution for sacrifices already made, and an encourage- 
 ment for others to be risked in future. 
 
 To appreciate more clearly these ideas, we must look at the 
 effects of different notions in the mode of their application to 
 the colony of Algeria. 
 
 Military expeditions have been multiplied, and many towns 
 taken ; the greater portion of which were speedily abandoned, 
 and as speedily the enemy, who had been driven out, resumed 
 possession of them. We occupied Bougia, we left there a 
 numerous garrison, we constructed magnificent military works 
 at an enormous expense. What do they protect ? what do 
 they defend ? We placed a force at Tlemcen ; it is blocked 
 up in the Casbah. Of what use is it ? But this garrison, five 
 hundred in number, requires every six months an expedition 
 to revictual it. At this moment a new expedition of five 
 thousand men is about to leave Oran with all the chances of 
 war, and in an execrable season, to carry supplies to the five 
 hundred at Tlemcen. 
 
 But these different expeditions, which have cost so many 
 men destroyed by the enemy or by the diseases of the climate, 
 and the enormous expenditure of materiel in enterprises 
 which have left no result even when successful, have they, at 
 least, produced a salutary influence on the minds of the 
 natives ? Have they increased security in the places origi- 
 
 FF 4
 
 428 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 ginally occupied ? On the contrary, the natives attack us 
 with undiminished audacity and inveteracy at Oran, at 
 Bona, and at Algiers itself. The radius sheltered from their 
 attacks becomes daily more restricted. Two years ago we 
 could travel without danger to a distance of twelve leagues 
 from Algiers and fifteen from Bona. At present it is diffi- 
 cult to go beyond the walls with impunity, and our perpetual 
 incursions, while they irritate the Arabs, remove from them 
 all idea of peace and friendly understanding, and keep them 
 in a constant spirit of hostility and warfare. 
 
 To-day we march on Constantine ; but Constantine taken, 
 what will be done next ? A French garrison might be left 
 there, but to support that garrison the same course will be 
 adopted as at Tlemcen ; a strong corps must be established at 
 Bona, which every six months will have to place itself in 
 movement to revictual the garrison of Constantine. 
 
 To k^ep up such a system, fifty thousand men, at least, 
 would be required; but having only limited resources, and 
 wishing to occupy too many points at a time, we are com- 
 pelled to send in one direction the troops required for another, 
 and thus to endanger the disarmed post. The natives then 
 resume their courage and return ; the colonists, if any have 
 establishments there, become alarmed, and fall into helpless 
 despondency. In no quarter is there stability or safety, and 
 day by day all has to be commenced anew. 
 
 To go to Constantine, Algiers was stripped, and the Arabs 
 immediately appeared upon the walls. If they knew how to 
 combine, and were well commanded, this imprudence might 
 have led to a lamentable result. Algiers has thus been compro- 
 mised. "NMiat will the taking of Constantine produce as an 
 equivalent for so great a risk, and what has been gained by 
 the capture of Bougia, Tlemcen, Mascara, and Medeah ? A 
 heavy loss of men and money, perpetual occasions for expen- 
 diture, but nothing for the progress of our settlement in Africa. 
 
 These opinions are those of all in Algeria who have any
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 429 
 
 knowledge of the correct state of things, and have carried 
 into that country thoughts of the future, or interests uncon- 
 nected with intrigue. 
 
 The last expedition has been looked upon with much pain. 
 Deep regret is expressed at this perseverance in a system, the 
 disastrous effects of which the residents are in a better posi- 
 tion of estimating than any one else. 
 
 I cannot refrain from my own observations on the subject. 
 This expedition will add one more to the difficulties of a 
 return to the only direction which I consider reasonable and 
 sound. The occupation of Tlemcen, Bougia, and so many 
 other points is incompatible with that course, and are diffi- 
 culties in substantial existence. To abandon these posts 
 would be dangerous : on the one hand, as regards the natives, 
 who, seeing in that retreat an evidence of our weakness and 
 uncertainty, would redouble their boldness ; on the other, as 
 regards public opinion in France, which is often highly sus- 
 ceptible, but with little intelligence. 
 
 If we do not take care, every day will add to difficulties 
 of this character. 
 
 The actual state of things in Algeria presents this singular 
 anomaly. The government conceived the occupation under 
 a special point of view. The person who represents the 
 government at Algiers, and who is delegated to carry out its 
 idea, has himself regarded the occupation in an entirely 
 different aspect, so that the execution is a secret but perpetual 
 struggle with the superior thought which is supposed to direct. 
 But as the agent in Africa has the advantage of position, and 
 it is through his reports that the government receives its in- 
 formation, he naturally presents it in a sense favourable to his 
 personal connections, and the government finds itself reduced, 
 wdthout its own knowledge, to act contrary to its own inten- 
 tions. If it resists, public opinion is brought into the ques- 
 tion. Now, you, sii-, are well aware how readily public 
 opinion allows itself to be prejudiced, and becomes a panic
 
 430 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 to wliicb concessions are often yielded and afterwards re- 
 gretted. 
 
 This is precisely the case with the expedition to Constan- 
 tine. It has been loudly proclaimed;, it has been sedulously 
 repeated that it was necessary, and thus it has been allowed 
 to take its course. But from this necessity others will spring 
 up, and from concession to concession the government may 
 find itself led on to such a point as to be unable to retrace 
 its steps, and will be reduced to choose between these two 
 alternatives, — to embark completely in a system which is not 
 its own, is disastrous, and demanding incalculable sacrifices, 
 and to consent to those sacrifices — or to abandon the colony 
 altogether. 
 
 I have told the government my opinion on the expedition 
 to Constantine, as much on the very equivocal necessity and 
 utility of the enterprise, as on the danger of undertaking it 
 at such a period. I have even expressed serious apprehen- 
 sions as to its result, while deploring the departure of the 
 Duke of Nemours. Unhappily, the reports spread within the 
 last few days, and the echo of which must have reached 
 Paris while I am writing, have already given a confirmation 
 to my words far exceeding what I anticipated, but which I 
 trust will not be verified. 
 
 These reports, the prolonged absence of news from the 
 expeditionary force, the anxiety thereby produced, the de- 
 monstrations recently made by the Arabs under the walls of 
 Algiers, and the consequent alarm, — all these circumstances 
 have revived the interest attached to the African question. 
 The session of the Chambers being about to open under the 
 influence of so many painful prepossessions, it is probable 
 that this feeling may re-exhibit itself in the debate on the 
 address. 
 
 The African question principally affects you as a personal 
 consideration. As you said to me, it is your individual affair. 
 It will therefore be upon you that the weight will fall of
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 431 
 
 replying to the questions of which it cannot fail to be the 
 subject, and of calming the uncertainties which recent events 
 have cast upon the destiny of our possessions. 
 
 You will have once more to declare the formal and irrevo- 
 cable intentions of the government, for such is the fatality 
 attached to this question, despite the assurances given every 
 year, that each annual debate renews the necessity of their 
 repetition. The declarations of Marshal Soult did not exempt 
 M. Thiers, and those of M. Thiers will not enfranchise you. 
 It seems, in defiance of so many restricted announcements, 
 and of time itself, that this matter is to remain ever in 
 dispute. 
 
 It is not that the country doubts the sincerity of the words 
 addressed to it, or the intentions of the government. But 
 seeing that nothing yet corroborates these words and inten- 
 tions ; that the despatch of troops and expeditions increases ; 
 that expenses accumulate without positive progress; and 
 that, on the contrary, things seem to recede rather than to 
 advance; not perceiving anything indicative of establish- 
 ment in future, it demands a guarantee for these solemn 
 declarations which it fails to discover in facts, and which, 
 without the support of facts, will ever prove insufficient. 
 
 On the present occasion, the declaration of the government 
 passing through your lips will derive new strength from the 
 authority of your character. But to balance the baneful 
 effect of what has recently happened in Africa, to do away 
 with prepossessions, which, to speak wdthout reserve, have 
 been perfidiously entertained and encouraged, it is indispen- 
 sable that this declaration should be as explicit in its terms as 
 absolute in its sense. You will, therefore, sir and minister, 
 be called upon to repeat openly that Africa is a part of 
 France, and that the government is resolved to make all the 
 necessary sacrifices to secure to the country the benefits 
 which ought to accrue from that possession. 
 
 This declaration being made, perhaps it would be prudent
 
 432 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 not to enter into the details of the restrictive system Avhich 
 the govermnent might think it suitable to apply to Africa. 
 The public in general have a confused idea of restrictions ; 
 they more readily grasp absolute ideas because they are more 
 simple. If you speak of restriction, it will give rise to a reserved 
 apprehension of abandonment ; people will misinterpret the 
 meaning of your words, as they did once before, when you 
 spoke with so much justice, truth, and enlightenment on 
 the Algerian question. 
 
 The system of occupation is more an executive fact, on 
 which the Chamber is less inclined to interfere. The appro- 
 bation it bestowed two years since on the principles laid 
 before it on this point, did not prevent its acquittal of 
 Marshal Clauzel for having deviated from these principles. 
 This, therefore, is a matter to be reserved for the reports 
 between the minister and the officer appointed to carry out 
 his instructions, — the Chambers care only for the expenditure 
 and the definitive result. 
 
 But considering the delicate position in which the African 
 question is placed at this moment, it is important to say 
 nothing which might be laid hold of to augment the -sus- 
 picions to which the public mind is now inclined, and to 
 discredit beforehand the measures which the government 
 may adopt to lead the affairs of the colony to a better 
 direction. 
 
 You will, I hope, Sir, excuse the freedom ^vith which I 
 address you on subjects respecting which you can have no 
 better inspiration than your own judgment. But having 
 recently returned from Algiers, and still retaining the im- 
 pression of all I saw there, residing in a city closely con- 
 nected with Africa by the multiplied ties of its interests and 
 hopes, and where everything that passes on the opposite 
 side of the Mediterranean is so directly echoed, I have 
 thought that the information collected in this double position 
 might have some value in your eyes. If I have deceived
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 433 
 
 myself, you will pardon me for an excess of interest in a 
 subject to which I am strongly attached by the mission 
 with which I have lately been charged, and the manner in 
 which that trust was confided to me. 
 
 I beg, above all things, that you will find in my pro- 
 ceeding a token of high deference, and of the respect with 
 which I have the honour to remain. 
 
 Sir and Minister, 
 Your very humble and most obedient Servant, 
 
 The Lieutenant-General, Peer of France, 
 
 (Signed) Comte Damremont.
 
 434 
 
 No. XL 
 
 (Page 218.) 
 
 Flan and Notes prepared for the Debate on the Bill fov the 
 Disjunction of Prosecutions in cases of crimes imputed to 
 civil and militai^ offenders, — 1837. 
 
 Gentlemen, 
 
 A day will come when the causes which now divide us 
 will have disappeared, when the passions which agitate us 
 will be extinct, and what we now see and do will have 
 passed into history. 
 
 People will then read that on emerging from a great 
 revolution, after I know not how many riots, conspiracies, 
 and insurrections, the government of France, her King, and 
 her institutions, were attacked, in open day, in a fortified 
 city, by soldiers who imprisoned their general, marched 
 comrade against comrade, regiment against regiment, and 
 that this military revolt was brought to judgment, and 
 absolutely acquitted. 
 
 It will be read that this was neither an isolated fact 
 nor a solitary instance of the weakness or insufficiency of 
 the laws in similar or in analogous circumstances. 
 
 It will be read, that in presence of such facts, in the 
 midst of such a position, the government demanded of the 
 Chambers — what? exceptional laws, more rigorous penal- 
 ties, extraordinary powers ? — no ; but simply the surren- 
 der of military traitors and rebels to military tribunals. 
 
 At the same time will be read an account of all the
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 435 
 
 indignation, invectives, extravagant accusations, and sin- 
 ister predictions of which, on this occasion, and through 
 this Bill, the government became the object. 
 
 Grentlemen, I do not hesitate to affirm that all this will 
 neither be comprehended, explained, nor believed. 
 
 What is there, in fact, in the bill, which can, I will not say- 
 justify, but even account for these recriminations and this 
 passion? 
 
 Nothing, gentlemen, absolutely nothing; nothing at least 
 in the eyes of resolute spirits unclouded by prejudice. 
 
 Nothing contrary to essential rights, to reason, and to 
 immutable justice. 
 
 I believe in a right anterior and superior to written rights, 
 which precedes, but does not proceed from them. I vash this 
 right to be respected on all occasions. 
 
 It is perfectly respected by the bill which consigns military 
 offenders, in all cases when the military element predominates 
 in the act, to military tribunals. 
 
 This jurisdiction is founded on reason. There is a special 
 peculiarity in the position of the soldier. 
 
 In his offence there are two constitutive elements of crime : 
 first, the moral wrong ; and secondly, the social danger ; both 
 are quite distinct from the crimes committed by civilians. 
 
 The necessity of judges capable of fully appreciating these 
 distinctions: 1. The moral wrong; 2. The social danger. 
 That is to say, capable of rendering justice to the accused 
 party and to society. 
 
 Hence the essential and rational legitimacy of military 
 jurisdiction in military cases : it is thus natural and right. 
 
 It contains nothing contrary to constitutional right. I 
 have a profound respect for the Charter. It contains nothing 
 in opposition to this bill. 
 
 1. It plainly supports military jurisdiction, not as an ex- 
 ceptional procedure, but as ordinary justice in certain crimes 
 committed by certain individuals. Nothing is exceptional
 
 436 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 but what is transitory, which does not rest on a permanent 
 and ever reasonable motive. 
 
 The military tribunals belong to ordinary justice^ as do the 
 tribunals of commerce and police. 
 
 2. But the Charter, it is said, assigns political crimes to the 
 trial by jury. 
 
 What ! To all criminals whatever, even when they are im- 
 plicated in other offences ? 
 
 Evidently not. 
 
 The exceptions are numerous with regard to persons. 
 1. Ministers; 2. Peers; 3. The jurisdiction of the Chambers 
 and tribunals in certain cases of offence ; 4. Certain attempts 
 against the safety of the state. 
 
 All this is written in the Charter. But there is also here 
 another consideration. Political offences committed by soldiers 
 are always, or nearly always, mixed up with military crimes. 
 Not only does the offence receive, from the quality of the 
 offender, a totally different character, but it becomes complex, 
 mixed ; there are, in fact, two different crimes. 
 
 But supposing that these two crimes fall under different 
 jurisdictions, which is to absorb or annul the other? Must 
 one remain unpunished ? or must it be punished by a juris- 
 diction to which it does not belong ? 
 
 Comparative table of political and military offences, ac- 
 cording to the two codes. 
 
 Evidently the Charter prescribes nothing as regards these 
 mixed crimes, and it is perfectly according to law to remit 
 them to military judges. 
 
 A thousand notions of public interest suggest the course. 
 
 3. The disjunction, that is to say, the removal of persons 
 distinctly accused to their respective natural judges, is, on the 
 other hand, a true and constitutional solution of the difficulty. 
 
 Until now, one jurisdiction has been absolutely sacrificed 
 to the other; alternately the military to the civil, and the 
 civil to the militarv.
 
 HISTOEIC DOCUMENTS. - 437 
 
 In fact, the alternate struggle and triumph of two absolute 
 principles has been for a long time the condition of France. 
 
 This presents a special feature: the invariable result has 
 been anarchy or despotism. 
 
 There is neither true nor durable order, true nor durable 
 liberty, except under the condition of accepting natural dis- 
 tinctions and their consequences. We cannot long or with 
 impunity outrage facts and social necessities. Uniformity, 
 that idea which, by a false air of greatness, seduces so many 
 little minds, as Montesquieu says, has done much mischief in 
 legislation, as in other matters, and has led to much disorder 
 and oppression. 
 
 We ought to emerge from it whenever natural distinctions 
 command. This is the true constitutional principle. 
 
 I hold the religion of the jury, not its superstition : no 
 idols. 
 
 Nothing, then, either in natural or constitutional law 
 rejects the bill. 
 
 4. A single principle is opposed to it : the indivisibility of 
 prosecution, the connection of crimes. 
 
 The principle exists neither in natural nor in constitutional 
 law. It is affirmed to be in the very necessity of things. I 
 deny this. 
 
 Historical argument. This, it is said, is the constant, 
 eternal principle of our legislation. An error. Variety 
 of competency in courts, and, consequently, disjunction of 
 causes, according to the quality and position of persons, is, 
 on the contrary, the old European law. 
 
 1. Legislation and competency were at first exclusively 
 personal and not actual. A law anterior to feudal law. 
 
 2. Under the feudal law, competency was founded on the 
 quality of persons, — nobles, citizens, ecclesiastics, — each were 
 remitted to their appropriate judges. 
 
 The connection of crimes and the indivisibility of prosecu- 
 tions have been the means of which royalty, and the judicial 
 VOL. IV. G G
 
 438 ' HISTORIC documents. 
 
 power emanating from that source, have very skilfully and 
 happily availed themselves to struggle against all those varied 
 jurisdictions proceeding from as many different pretensions 
 to sovereignty, to abolish these last, and to establish amongst 
 us that unity of nation, monarchy, power, and law, which 
 has so much contributed to the strength and beauty of our 
 civilization. 
 
 I never deny to my adversaries their share of truth. I 
 reserve my own, and call upon the Chamber to weigh them 
 together. 
 
 Indivisibility of prosecution has been thus introduced into 
 our law and practice. This is its origin and the cause of 
 its empire. It is not with us an eternally historical prin- 
 ciple. 
 
 2. Philosopliic argument. Not to enter too far into the 
 question ; a few fundamental observations. 
 
 When a crime is committed by several persons, two facts 
 are essential : 
 
 1. The unity of the crime. 
 
 2. The diversity of the actors. 
 
 When I say the unity of the crime, the expression is too 
 vague. There are in the crime as many facts, that is to say, 
 as many crimes as there are authors or accomplices. 
 
 And these facts and crimes are as distinct as the criminals. 
 
 But I admit the unity of the crime. 
 
 Legislation and criminal prosecution may take for their 
 point of departure, for their dominant idea and guiding rule, 
 one of these two facts ; — either the unity of the crime or 
 the diversity of its authors. 
 
 Hence arise two different systems : 
 
 1 . General and simultaneous prosecution. 
 
 2. Individual and successive prosecution. 
 
 And not only have these two systems been adopted, but 
 they are still adopted and followed in practice. General and 
 simultaneous prosecutions in France, individual and successive
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 439 
 
 prosecutions in England, at the selection of the accused, and 
 usually adopted by them.* 
 
 And the choice between the two systems depends, above 
 all, upon the idea formed of the situation of the accused, and 
 of the method it suggests of discovering the truth. 
 
 In France it is especially from interrogating and confront- 
 ing the accused that the discovery of the truth is expected. 
 The accused are held as liars who must be brought to con- 
 fession, and compelled to see the truth exhibited before them 
 and through themselves. 
 
 Hence the necessity of general and simultaneous prosecu- 
 tion. 
 
 In England they do not look for the discovery of the truth 
 to what can be extracted from the accused, to their avowals 
 or contradictions. They are held as liars from whom no 
 truth can be expected. The witnesses alone are relied on. 
 
 Hence the faculty and natural adoption of individual and 
 successive prosecution. 
 
 The first plan possesses the advantage of placing crime in 
 a more complete and evident light. It is more systematic 
 and dramatic. 
 
 The second plan has the advantage of confining the accused 
 within a narrower circle; of examining his case more spe- 
 cially; and of obtaining a more exact estimate of his share 
 in the crime and of the consequent penalty. 
 
 I do not compare the two systems. I bring them to- 
 gether to discover their essential features. I show that both 
 may flow from the nature of things ; that both are practicable 
 and practised ; — with different consequences in the ad- 
 ministration of justice, but which neither threaten nor change 
 in the slightest degree justice itself. 
 
 I do not propose to abandon generally the system which 
 
 * TransIato7-^s Note. — A remarkable exception cccuii'ed in the case of 
 Lord Cocliraue, who chose to be included in the general indictment, and 
 in some measure owed his conviction to that mistake. 
 
 G G 2
 
 440 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 has hitherto prevailed with us ; despite its serious objections 
 it has great advantages. I conclude only from all this, and 
 I conclude with strong conviction, that if powerful motives, 
 and motives of public interest recommend the proceeding, 
 we may, in certain cases, depart from this system and re- 
 nounce indivisibility of prosecution without offending either 
 reason, justice, the Charter, or practical possibility. 
 
 Do these motives at present exist with us ? Does the actual 
 state of society and of facts recommend and require the bill ? 
 — Reply to M. Teste and to the taunt of alleging the neces- 
 sity. • 
 
 I. Necessity of strengthening military jurisdiction. 
 
 Why is the bill introduced on the occurrence of a fact ? I 
 have already answered this taunt on the occasion of the bills 
 of September. A fact manifests a pre-existing social neces- 
 sity ; the public is impressed by it ; the government then acts. 
 Thus we proceed in free countries. This is a homage to the 
 necessity of convictions and to the Kberty of intelligence. 
 
 Progressive enfeeblement of military jurisdiction: 
 
 1. State of siege in 1832. Not to discuss the merit of 
 that ordinance. Proposed law. Not enacted. Blank re- 
 maining to the detriment of military jurisdiction. 
 
 2. Change of jurisprudence of the Court of Appeal on the 
 subject of decoying and kidnapping. 
 
 3. Verdict of Strasburg. 
 
 Greneral consternation of the military chiefs. Loss of dis- 
 cipline ; and, in effect : 
 
 1. The political offences of soldiers are essentially mixed 
 up with the most serious military delinquencies, which are 
 thus transferred to the trial by jury. The connection of per- 
 sons carries soldiers before the jury. The connection of facts 
 equally delivers them to military jurisdiction. 
 
 2. Simple military offences not mixed with political crimes 
 will be handed over to the jury by the sole fact of civil 
 complicity.
 
 HISTOKIC DOCUMENTS. 441 
 
 An evident weakening, almost a complete abolition of mili- 
 tary jurisdiction, which is not alone compromised. Eemind 
 the Chamber of its own impressions on the news of the 
 verdict. Necessity of long reminiscences, of profound impres- 
 sions. This is true wisdom. Danger of improvidence and 
 oblivion. 
 
 Necessity of restoring the military spirit 
 
 There has been a talk of suspicion against the army. 
 
 A strange proof of suspicion to call upon it to judge itself. 
 
 In the army, as in all other departments, the government 
 mistrusts the bad and confides in the good. This is its 
 duty. 
 
 There, as elsewhere, it recognizes the well-disposed in a 
 great majority. 
 
 But we must go farther and obtain a more complete 
 account of the position of the army in society as it now 
 exists. 
 
 1. The army is national, taken impartially and blindly 
 from the bosom of the nation. The ideas, therefore, and 
 differences of opinion which exist in the nation will be found 
 again in the army. There will be republicans, legitimists, 
 and an immense majority of the moderate party. 
 
 The military spirit will diminish, melt, and absorb many 
 of these different shades. But they will still exist. We 
 may believe this, and endeavour to regulate them. 
 
 We ought neither to be astonished nor uneasy at this fact, 
 neither should we deny nor treat it lightly. 
 
 2. The army is idle, — we are at peace; we shall remain 
 long at peace. Inaction furnishes to external attempts more 
 power over the army, and more room for the non-military 
 activity of its internal dispositions. 
 
 3. The army lives in the same atmosphere with the citi- 
 zens, — surrounded by the publicity and liberty of the press ; 
 — there is no more of the isolation, of the special and clois- 
 tered life of the armies of earlier days. — Everything now 
 
 gg3
 
 442 HISTORIC documents. 
 
 reaches the army, — everything acts upon it. — It lives under 
 the same influences with society in general. 
 
 From all these new facts springs the enfeeblement of the 
 military spirit, of that special and powerful spirit which 
 stamps on the army ideas, sentiments and habits peculiar 
 to itself. 
 
 I do not absolutely lament this change. It has its good 
 and evil ; it suppresses old dangers, but it creates new ones. 
 
 The absolute necessity of the military spirit : 
 
 1. For the power of the army abroad and in case of need. 
 It is not number nor even ardour which constitutes the 
 sole strength of the army. Its first power lies in the 
 peculiar spirit, the energetic tastes, and deeply-rooted habits 
 of the military vocation. 
 
 2. For the power and discipline of the army at home : 
 The military spirit is the first element of obedience 
 
 and discipline in the army ; even as penal enactments 
 would prove insufficient without public morality, to maintain 
 order in society, so the police courts and prisons would be 
 unable, without the military spirit, to preserve discipline in 
 the army. 
 
 3. The military spirit has an extremely beautiful moral 
 code, necessary for its particular application, and the more 
 so that the virtues it develops are less regarded in general 
 society. These virtues are especially : 
 
 Eespect to the regulated system. 
 
 Fidelity to the oath. The importance of these virtues in 
 the existing state of society. Shall we allow them to become 
 effete in the army ? — Shall we allow that military spirit, so 
 noble and excellent in itself, so useful and essential on many 
 accounts, to deteriorate ? No, no. 
 
 Such, however, would be the inevitable effect of an en- 
 feeblement of the military jurisdiction. The ties which unite 
 inferiors to superiors in the army would become weakened 
 thereby in full proportion, and we should thus add to all the
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 443 
 
 injurious influences which already tend to enervate the mili- 
 tary spirit, and to take from it its moral and practical supre- 
 macy. 
 
 Thus the proposed bill is : 
 
 1. Conformable to reason and natural justice. 
 
 2. Conformable to the Charter, and to constitutional rights. 
 
 3. Practicable. 
 
 4. Necessary to re-establish and strengthen, 1. Military 
 jurisdiction; 2. Military spirit. Will it accomplish these 
 benefits ? 
 
 Not alone, but it will co-operate in obtaining them. Good 
 laws do not absolve governments from good conduct; but 
 good conduct requires good laws. 
 
 We have already passed several. They have not done 
 everything. They have done much. There is still evil, 
 much evil, in our society. But an infinitely greater pro- 
 portion of good, enough to conquer the evil. But the 
 struggle will be long. 
 
 Nothing ends rapidly in free countries. The prolongation 
 of strife is a demonstration of liberty. We would not, even if 
 we could, stifle liberty. But we shall never cease to combat 
 with its aberrations. I respect and love liberty. I do not 
 fear it. We cannot promise repose to honest men and 
 good citizens, — we can only promise them victory. — Mode- 
 rate laws and measures applied by^ energetic legislators 
 are what our state of society requires at present; these 
 are what we endeavour to bestow on it. * 
 
 G G 4
 
 444 
 
 No. XII. 
 
 (Page 286.) 
 
 Draft of an Address to the King, presented to the Chamber 
 
 by the Committee* 
 
 Sire, Session of Jmmary ^th, 1839. 
 
 The Chamber of Deputies reciprocates your Majesty's 
 satisfaction at the prosperity of the country. This prosperity 
 will develop itself, more and more, in the bosom of the peace 
 we have maintained, and the duration of which a prudent 
 and firm policy can alone secure to us. 
 
 Under a government jealous of our dignity, and the 
 faithful guardian of our alliances, France will always main- 
 tain in the world, and in the esteem of other nations, the 
 rank which belongs to her, and from which she desires not 
 to fall. 
 
 Your Majesty hopes that the resumed conferences in 
 London will furnish new pledges for the repose of Europe 
 and the independence of Belgium. We offer up sincere 
 wishes for a people closely allied to us by conformity of 
 principles and interests. The Chamber awaits the issue of 
 the negotiations. 
 
 You announce to us, Sire, that in virtue of engagements 
 
 • This committee consisted of MM. Passy (ITyppolitc), Debellcyme, 
 Giiizot, De Jussieu, Etienne, Thiers, Mathicu do la Iledorte, Dc la 
 Pmsonuiero, and Uuvergier de Ilaurauuc.
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 445 
 
 entered into with the Holy See our troops have left Ancona. 
 We have given signal testimonies of our respect for treaties, 
 but we reo-ret that this evacuation was not effected under 
 more opportune circumstances, and with the guarantees 
 which a wise and provident policy ought to require. 
 
 A misunderstanding has arisen between your government 
 and that of Switzerland. We hope it may not alter the re- 
 lations of old friendship which united the two countries, and 
 which were even more closely drawn together by the political 
 events of 1830. 
 
 With profound sorrow we see Spain exhaust herself in the 
 horrors of civil war. We ardently desire that your Majesty's 
 government, while continuing to lend the cause of Queen 
 Isabella II. the support which consists with the interests of 
 France, may, in concert with her allies, exert its utmost in- 
 fluence to terminate these deplorable excesses. 
 
 The Chamber, deeply affected by the misfortunes of Poland, 
 renews its constant hopes in favour of a people, whose an- 
 cient nationality is placed under the protection of treaties. 
 
 The insults and spoliation to which our countrymen have 
 been subjected in Mexico, called for signal satisfaction. 
 Your government felt the necessity of demanding it, and the 
 brilliant exploit of St. John d'Ulloa, while covering our 
 army with fresh glory, has given France a just subject for 
 exultation. She has seen. Sire, one of your sons sharing the 
 dangers and successes of our intrepid mariners. 
 
 We accord heartily with your Majesty's satisfaction at the 
 state of our possessions in Africa. We have full confidence 
 that this condition will improve from day to day, through the 
 discipline of the army, the regularity of the administration, 
 and the beneficent action of an enlightened faith. 
 
 Your Majesty announced in a preceding session that pro- 
 positions relative to the reimbursement of the public debt 
 would be laid before us as soon as the state of the finances 
 permitted. The condition of the national revenue becoming
 
 446 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 continually more favom-able, affords us the right of expecting 
 that the co-operation of your government will not long be 
 wthheld from this important measure. 
 
 The wants of our colonies and our navigation will be 
 objects of our undivided solicitude. We shall study to 
 reconcile them ^^^th the interests of our agriculture, the 
 development of which is of the highest importance to the 
 prosperity of the country. 
 
 The Chamber will examine with equal care the bills des- 
 tined to realize the promises of the Charter, and to introduce 
 new improvements in general legislation, as well as in par- 
 ticular branches of public government. Our desires also call 
 for the bill relative to the organization of the general staff 
 of the army. 
 
 Sire, all France has hailed with acclamation the birth of 
 the Count of Paris. We encircle with our homage the cradle 
 of this young prince, granted to your love and to the most 
 cherished wishes of the country. Educated, like his father, 
 in respect for our institutions, he will learn the glorious 
 origin of the dynasty of which you are the head, and will 
 never forget that the throne he is destined one day to occupy 
 is founded on the controlling power of the national will. We 
 associate ourselves. Sire, in common with all Frenchmen, in 
 the domestic and religious sentiments with which this auspi- 
 cious event must inspire you as a father and a king. 
 
 Why, Sire, at the moment when we are returning thanks, 
 are we called upon to deplore with you the loss of a beloved 
 daughter, the model of every virtue ! May the expression 
 of the unanimous feeling of the Chamber afford some conso- 
 lation to the sorrows of your august family I 
 
 We feel convinced. Sire, that the intimate union of authori- 
 ties restrained within their constitutional limits can alone 
 establish the security of the country and the strength of your 
 government. A firm and skilful administration, based upon 
 generous sentiments, causing the dignity of your throne to
 
 HISTOKIC DOCUMENTS. 447 
 
 be respected abroad, and covering it with its responsibility at 
 home, is the surest pledge of the co-operation we are so 
 desirous to offer. Trust us, Sire, in virtue of our institutions ; 
 they will secure, rely upon it, your rights and ours ; for we 
 hold it for certain that constitutional monarchy guarantees at 
 once the liberty of the people, and the stability which forms 
 the greatness of states.
 
 448 
 
 No. XIII. 
 
 (Pago 292.) 
 1. M. Giiizot to his Constituents. 
 
 Gentlemen, Paris, Feb. Gth, 1839. 
 
 The Chamber of Deputies is dissolved. It is dissolved by 
 a cabinet which, eight days before, after a formal debate, had 
 dissolved itself in its presence, not being able to obtain there, 
 by its own avowal, a sufficient majority for its support. 
 
 This is the second Chamber with which, within the space 
 of sixteen months, this cabinet has been unable to exist, and 
 feels compelled to dissolve. 
 
 Wherefore ? 
 
 Have these Chambers, in the internal constitution of the 
 state, adopted any of those great innovations, those impor- 
 tant concessions to which the crown objects, and with reason, 
 until the necessity of their adoption has been long felt and 
 clearly proved ? 
 
 Or have they di-iven the government, in its relations with 
 other states, to any of those doubtful and dangerous enterprises 
 which the wisdom of the crown ought to discourage ? 
 
 In no sense whatever. 
 
 During no period of their existence have the two dissolved 
 Chambers pressed on the crown any debilitating concession 
 or compromising enterprise. Not for a single day have they 
 shoAvu themselves possessed with the spirit of innovation or 
 of war. 
 
 Quite the contrary.
 
 HISTORIC DOCUaiENTS. 449 
 
 In the interior, they have both assented to nearly all the 
 demands of the cabinet, without demanding anything them- 
 selves. 
 
 Their only expressed desire, the desire for the reimburse- 
 ment of the funds, assuredly comprised nothing dangerous to 
 our institutions, nothing hostile to power. 
 
 Externally, these Chambers sanctioned and sustained, in 
 the most thorny questions, the policy adopted in 1830. 
 
 And in this session, scarcely opened, even in the draft of 
 the address so vehemently attacked, the Chamber about to 
 expire held precisely the same conduct. 
 
 Internally it has urged no new demand. 
 
 Externally : — 
 
 As regards Belgium, it has scrupulously abstained from 
 indicating a design or uttering a word which might shackle 
 the government and compromise it with Europe. 
 
 As to Spain, it has maintained the expression of the reserved 
 and pacific sentiment maintained in its first session. 
 
 Facts proclaim this loudly ; and it must be recalled to those 
 who forget facts. The Chamber of 1837 was in 1839, as at 
 its commencement, like the preceding Chamber, a stranger to 
 all internal encroachment or foreign enterprise, favourable to 
 the system of conservatism and peace. 
 
 Yet, nevertheless, these two Chambers have been dissolved, 
 dissolved before their term. Neither with the one nor the 
 other, not more with the Chamber convoked by itself than 
 with that which it found, could the cabinet exist. 
 
 Once more, what has led to this strange and important 
 fact? 
 
 Here is one, and the principal cause. The cabinet was 
 unknown to the Chamber of Deputies : it had with the Cham- 
 ber no reciprocal interest, no intimate and natural authority. 
 Hence arose two consequences. The policy of the cabinet 
 at home and abroad was weak and unnational. Even while 
 still existing, the cabinet itself became more and more feeble.
 
 450 niSTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 and less national, incapable of maintaining with strength or 
 credit its own policy. 
 
 Here is the fact in its truth ; here is the evil in its full 
 extent. 
 
 This fact, this evil, the cabinet itself has recognized, re- 
 vealed, and palpably demonstrated by these two precipitate 
 dissolutions of two Chambers, so moderate, and exacting so 
 little. 
 
 The parliamentary impotence of the cabinet has, twice 
 within two years, condemned the parliament to death. 
 
 Perhaps, if we had no Charter, no chamber, no tribune, no 
 liberty of the press, — under such circumstances, possibly, the 
 cabinet of the 15th of April might have sufficed to govern. 
 It wants nothing of the dexterity and conformity, of the skill 
 in saving appearances and treating with persons, of the art 
 and qualifications which, under the old system, acquired and 
 retained power. 
 
 But, fifty years ago, in 1789, our fathers conceived a noble 
 desire, the desire of living in a free country ; that is to say, 
 of taking part themselves in the government of their country. 
 This participation in power is the only strong and real 
 guarantee of liberty. 
 
 This is the end which, through so many misfortunes and 
 efforts, France has had in view for fifty years. Napoleon, 
 with his immense genius, his immeasurable activity and 
 boundless glory, could only detach her from it for a moment. 
 
 France is in the right. All her interests and rights are 
 herein comprised, her entire safety and honour. 
 
 When the country powerfully influences the government, 
 and the government frankly accepts the influence of the 
 country, the powers become united and effective. Their 
 strength passes into and appears in their acts, theii- attitude, 
 their language ; everywhere, within and without, instead of 
 retiring, they advance; instead of postponing, they decide; 
 affairs move on ; questions are solved. The road may be
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 451 
 
 strewed with obstacles, the horizon may be charged with 
 clouds, but we see and feel a leader who marches onwards, a 
 sun which shines through the horizon. 
 
 In place of that, what is the spectacle we actually look 
 on ? Where, now, in the opinion of all men, are France and 
 her government ? 
 
 Within : 
 
 The crown is said to be weakened and menaced in its 
 prerogative ; 
 
 The Chamber of Deputies is pronounced to be weakened 
 and menaced in its prerogative; 
 
 A struggle, without parallel since 1830, is in action be- 
 tween the crown and the chamber ; 
 
 "WTiile the powers are in contest, the affairs of the country 
 are at a stand-still. The administration is nullified. All 
 questions are in suspense ; the sugars, the railroads, the funds, 
 the abolition of slavery, and public education. Material 
 interests are not better treated or comprehended than moral 
 interests. 
 
 Without : 
 
 I lay aside all generalization ; I speak only of specific, 
 evident facts, and I speak of them in the most moderate 
 terms ; 
 
 In Italy, in Switzerland, the influence of France has 
 deteriorated ; 
 
 In Belgium, in Spain, the position is aggravated. 
 
 Where we are not compromised, we have retired and 
 isolated ourselves. Where we are still present and in action, 
 we are more compromised than ever. 
 
 This is the situation which the cabinet of the 15th of 
 April has created for us ; this is the point to which, in two 
 years, it has led authorities and affairs, the government and 
 the country. 
 
 And this in the bosom of profound peace, in presence of 
 the most amenable Chamber, despite the most favourable
 
 452 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 incidents, without encountering any important obstacle or real 
 danger. 
 
 I wish this favourable aspect of fortune to endure ; I 
 desire that the same facilities may continue to present them- 
 selves in the Chambers and throughout Europe, on the part 
 of men and events. If the cabinet remains in office, what 
 will happen ? 
 
 What has happened for the last two years. The same 
 simultaneous enfeeblement of the public powers, the same 
 confusion amongst them, the same nullity of administration, 
 the same adjournment of questions, the same decline of our 
 influence, the same increase of our embarrassments. 
 
 Some day, I know not when, but the day is infallible, a re- 
 action will come on, which will rudely rouse up the humbled 
 powers, the adjourned questions, the bruised feelings, the for- 
 gotten interests ; and which, without any possible presenti- 
 ment of its bearing, will add its own evils and perils to the 
 ills it proposes to cure. 
 
 The sentiment of this existing evil, and the anticipation 
 of the evil in perspective have determined my opposition. 
 
 I love and respect the government of July. France 
 founded it, and it has saved France. It is one of the pro- 
 foundest and proudest enjoyments of my thoughts to foretel 
 what the future will say of that glorious epoch, of that 
 double national effort, the one so bold, the other so pru- 
 dent; of those two serpents, absolutism and anarchy, both 
 strangled in their cradle. It costs me much to displease 
 when I love, and to oppose to serve. But I do not hesitate. 
 The favour of my king or country is equally dear to me ; 
 but I hold more closely still to their true interest and my 
 own duty. 
 
 I have seen more than one government compromised by 
 weak or improvident friends. I have never seen that the 
 warnings, even the resistance, of loyal and devoted partisans, 
 could be, I will not say a serious, but even a possible danger.
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 453 
 
 If I am mistaken, the mischief will recoil on myself ; if I am 
 right, I have never rendered more effectual service. 
 
 But the coalition ? 
 
 Here, I confess, if I were not well acquainted with the 
 empire of words and prejudices, I should be unable to re- 
 strain my astonishment. 
 
 What ! when for a great and cherished interest, a warning, 
 an act appears to me to be necessary, if a hundred persons, 
 otherwise extremely opposed, wish to speak and act with me, 
 I am required to pause and be silent ? I am not to do what I 
 think right, because I cannot do it alone, or only in concert 
 with my usual associates ! 
 
 For, observe well, it is understood, it is certain, that to 
 those persons, who, while acting with me on this occasion, 
 conceive and desire in reality other objects than mine, I 
 make no concession, I lend no support. The Republicans 
 and Carlists approved of the address ; — granted. Was the 
 address either Carlist or Republican ? And if it tendered 
 profitable advice to the monarchy of 1830, if it drew 
 it away from serious danger, was I bound to reject the ad- 
 dress because the Carlists and Republicans seconded it ? 
 I see the flame originate ; it smoulders, it will blaze forth ; 
 and am I not to cry Fire! for fear of some scattered mis- 
 chief-mongers who will repeat the cry with a different in- 
 tention ? 
 
 But the approbation, the joy of enemies is suspicious. I 
 admit it. It is therefore very necessary to be careful as to 
 what you say or do before them. That in itself the question 
 of the address was serious, that thus to point out the evil, 
 to do an act of opposition, serious motives were necessary, 
 no one is more convinced of than I am. I comprehend, 
 I admit, I provoke the most scrupulous examination of the 
 gravity of these motives. But the evil being recognised, 
 to refuse the remedy because enemies will rejoice in seeing 
 that evil admitted, or may endeavour "to profit by the 
 
 VOL. IV. H H
 
 454 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 fact, — this, permit me to say, is a line of conduct neither 
 sensible nor manly. 
 
 Let us take care of this : we desired a system of pub- 
 licity, discussion, and liberty. We live under it. It has its 
 trials, its annoyances. If we do not know how to accept 
 them; if we hesitate whenever an effort must be made, a 
 vexation endured, if the conflict disturbs, or the noise 
 dismays us, if the movement, the rapid and somewhat con- 
 fused jostling of opinions, interests, pretensions, and passions 
 chills and petrifies us, let us talk no more of liberty ; let 
 us abandon representative government, let us retrace our 
 steps. 
 
 Has this been well considered ? Has the position been 
 properly calculated? I cannot too often repeat, that the 
 draft of the address, just, according to my conviction, in its 
 censure of the cabinet, was loyal, respectful, and even 
 affectionate towards the monarchy of July. Is it then 
 nothing to have brought all parties, I will say, if it be so 
 desired, all factions to place themselves on such a ground, 
 to adopt such language? Hereafter, the draft of that 
 address will be read again, and some astonishment will be 
 excited on finding that the Kepublicans and Carlists joined 
 their approbation to ours. For myself, I am neither sur- 
 prised nor grieved that it should be so. I do not believe 
 in the conversion of all the enemies of the government of 
 July. For a long time there will be some, who, despite 
 the will of the country and their own experience, will 
 persevere in their hostility. But I also know that, even 
 in their obstinacy, the most inveterate parties will not 
 entirely escape the action of the time, the progress of 
 things ; and I accept, I accept with eagerness, every attitude 
 and conduct, entirely new for them, and which to a certain 
 point niay turn aside their enmity. Propose a good object, 
 a good employment even to dangerous passions, they will suffer 
 themselves to be drawn in that direction, and will lose
 
 HISTOEIC DOCUMENTS. 455 
 
 something of their dangerous character. For myself, when 
 I see Kepublicans and Carlists engage in the service of a 
 national cause, a national grievance, I watch them care- 
 fully, but I rejoice at the fact. The good also is con- 
 tagious; whoever touches it imbibes a little; we do not 
 place a foot on the right path without advancing a step; 
 and when vdse and moderate designs once begin to be 
 entertained, some impression will remain of wisdom and 
 moderation. 
 
 On much better grounds, and more keenly, I congratu- 
 lated myself on seeing opinions and persons sincerely 
 friendly to the government of July, and who restrain them- 
 selves within the circle of our institutions, meet together 
 on this ground of the address, and act in concert. I 
 may speak of true and honorable conciliation, for I have 
 always rejected false and cowardly concession; that by 
 which on both sides something is sacrificed of what we 
 think and wish, in the hope of reciprocal deception. I 
 hold such combinations as shameful in themselves and 
 unworthy of representative government. But when the 
 friendly understanding is sincere, when we bring to the 
 common stock all that we have of corresponding sentiments, 
 ideas, and intentions, I should like to know who can main- 
 tain a right, who could have the audacity to say any thing 
 against this proceeding? It is not only legitimate, but 
 excellent. It is one of the best results of our admirable 
 institutions, which, incessantly holding ideas and men in 
 contest, lead them to understand and purify each other, 
 and sooner or later produce a compromise in the bosom 
 of reason and the public interest. The representative system 
 is a system of constant agreement and concihation. Liberty 
 divides at first, and brings together afterwards. Who would 
 not be struck, to-day, by the progress of equitable sen- 
 timents and moderate ideas, which everywhere manifests 
 itself and tends towards accomplishment. And is not this 
 
 H n 2
 
 456 HISTORIC documents. 
 
 to be permitted to pass into the practice of public business ? 
 If not, political camps would become prisons, in which men 
 would remain eternally shut up and savage, inaccessible 
 to each other, as on the day of the most determined combat ! 
 Such a pretension, at all times false and mischievous, could 
 not be considered in our days, after all our revolutions, 
 as anything better than an interested lie or a palpable 
 absurdity. For myself, confident of never having deserted 
 my standard, proud of having always carried it myself in 
 the hour of danger, I am open, without embarrassment, to 
 all honest approaches, to every loyal coalition ; I look upon 
 that accomplished on the ground of the address as a 
 triumph for representative government; and I have no 
 more fear of losing my liberty for the future than I had 
 hesitation in using it on that occasion. 
 
 A passing word on the subject of the coalition, with 
 reference to two expressions frequently applied, — ambition 
 and intrigue. 
 
 I believe I may say without presumption, that if I had cared 
 little for my ideas and my friends, I should have found it 
 easy to gratify what is called ambition. I repeat here what 
 I have said elsewhere : I have an ambition, but not such 
 as that. 
 
 As to intrigue, of all accusations it is, in truth, the most 
 extraordinary. Every thing took place in the broad light 
 of day, under the eye of the country. WTiat I have said, 
 I have done ; what I have done, I have said. I have gone 
 farther: I have recorded what I did and said formerly. 
 I have scrupulously sought publicity on the present, and 
 fidelity for the past. On these two conditions, which con- 
 stitute my law, I shall never hesitate to act and to follow up 
 my object. 
 
 A last question remains ; I have reserved it because I have 
 it sincerely at heart. They have spoken of the crown, of its 
 inviolability, and of the respect which is its due. They say
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 457 
 
 that the draft of the address and its defenders were wanting 
 in that respect. 
 
 This is a spectacle without example. Here is an op- 
 position which declares and maintains, that it addresses 
 itself to the cabinet alone; it sees and exhibits nothing 
 but the cabinet. And the cabinet retires, expunges itself, 
 places the crown in front of it, affirms and repeats that it is 
 with the crown that we are dealing ! In vain the opposition 
 persists ; the cabinet persists in turn. It absolutely demands 
 that the crown should descend into the arena and act as its 
 shield. 
 
 But, ministers of the King, even though you indulged in 
 the most injurious supposition, even though you believed 
 that in addressing you exclusively, the opposition lied and 
 concealed its true idea, your first and simplest duty was, to 
 accept the lie of the opposition, and to hold royalty aloof 
 from the combat. It was for you to prevent its being reached 
 by the most trifling allusion, to keep its very name from 
 being pronounced ; you ought to have covered it with your 
 own bodies. And at the very moment when you assert that 
 you are capable of this, that you are fully equal to it, you 
 prove the contrary by your anxiety to drag the King upon 
 the scene to cover yourselves ; yes, you yourselves, under 
 the respect borne to him, and to demand in his name the 
 votes you ought to be able to obtain on your own account, 
 by your own influence, and which are refused to j^ou alone. 
 
 Under a constitutional monarchy I recognise nothing more 
 anti-monarchical and unconstitutional than the attitude and 
 language of the cabinet in this debate. 
 
 No, it is not the royal authority that we have called in 
 question. We bear towards it the greatest respect; we know 
 how much its presence and strength are necessary to France, 
 the services it has rendered, and will still render, to our 
 country. Let it then display its prerogatives freely and 
 fully ; let it, in its councils, enlighten and persuade its ad- 
 
 H H 3
 
 458 HISTORIC DOCmiENTS. 
 
 visers ; let it exercise over them its lawful influence. It is 
 its right to do so. It is also your privilege, ministers, to 
 enlighten the royal authority in your turn, to convince it 
 and make it thoroughly understand the influence of the 
 country; You will then answer to the country for all that it, 
 has done by your advice and with your concurrence. 
 
 This is what the country expects, what the Charter com- 
 mands from the advisers of the crown. This is what we find 
 you incapable of. You are too little acquainted with the 
 country and its immediate representatives ; you do not re- 
 present it yourselves, truly or firmly, with the crown. The 
 interests, the sentiments, the whole political and moral life 
 of the country, fail to reach the throne through your medium. 
 And, then, when you appear in the presence of the Chambers 
 as advisers of the crown, we find, on the one part, that the 
 crown has been badly advised by you, and the country ill 
 represented to the crown; and, on the other, that you ill 
 represent and defend the crown before the Chambers. For, 
 in our opinion, your weakness is double, and your insuffi- 
 ciency is double also. The crown suffers from both, with the 
 country and in the Chambers, and the Chambers and the 
 country suff'er equally in the councils of the crown. 
 
 Hence comes, as we think, the impossibility in which you 
 find yourselves of living with the best disposed and most 
 judicious Chambers. Hence arise those repeated and sudden 
 dissolutions, which reveal the troubles of power and aggra- 
 vate without the capability of curing them. 
 
 Now, you have already tried this remedy twice, and the evil 
 is not abated. It will re-appear on the opening, or soon after, 
 of new Chambers as in those that you have dissolved ; for it 
 exists in you, in you alone, in your insufficiency for the 
 Chambers with the crown, and for the crown with the 
 Chambers. 
 
 This is our opinion, our full opinion, in this great emer- 
 gency. It addresses itself to the cabinet, to the cabinet
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 459 
 
 alone, and nothing will induce us to exceed this limit of our 
 rights as of our duty. But we shall fulfil our entire duty ; 
 we shall exercise our utmost rights. Representative govern- 
 ment is our conquest ; the Charter is our truth. We cannot 
 lose a particle of either. The honour of France is implicated 
 in maintaining both : the honour of her fame and existence 
 since 1789; more since 1814; and more than all since 
 1830. 
 
 Her repose too is not less engaged than her honour. As 
 long as the actual cabinet subsists, you may hold this, gen- 
 tlemen, for certain : all things 'will remain as they are, or be 
 remitted to suspense and question. The dignity and security 
 of the country will totter together. You will see prevail, 
 in internal and external affairs, in the management of 
 material and moral interests, the same improvidence, the 
 same thoughtlessness, the same weakness ; and, for the com- 
 mon term of all, the same trials to which you are called 
 to-day. 
 
 I have exposed the evil ; the remedy, gentlemen, lies with 
 you. 
 
 GrUIZOT. 
 
 2. M. Guizot to M. Leroy-Beaulieu, Mayor of Lisieux. 
 
 My dear Sir, I'aris, Feb. 18th, 1839. 
 
 The cabinet proclaims in all directions, that to vote with 
 them is to vote for peace ; to vote with the opposition is to 
 vote for war. 
 
 On the 16th of January last, in the debate on the address, 
 I said, in the tribune : 
 
 " For eight years France and her government have been 
 engaged in the policy of peace. They were in the right. 
 I have maintained that policy ; I have maintained it in and 
 out of office, on all the benches of this Chamber. I am con- 
 
 H H 4
 
 460 IIISTOKIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 vinced, convinced to-day as then, that the morality and pro- 
 sperity of our revolution counselled and commanded that 
 policy. I am, and shall ever remain, faithful to it." 
 
 Repeat, I beg of you, repeat everywhere, what I said a 
 month since, and what I reiterate to-day. Yes, we desired, 
 we always desire peace; and peace can only be assvired 
 through our policy. The ministry which harangues so loudly 
 on the subject compromises peace. 
 
 What sensible man would desire war at present ? 
 
 We have made war for twenty years to liberate and esta- 
 blish ourselves. We required, we, new France required, first to 
 be masters at home, and next, to prove our strength to Europe 
 and to assume our proper rank. 
 
 The end is attained, thoroughly attained. We are masters 
 at home. In 1830, we plainly exhibited this fact. Europe 
 has acknowledged it. And as to glory, that baptism of peoples, 
 what old State, what ancient race can relate more than 
 ■what we have done ? 
 
 In our fierce combats for our independence and rank 
 amongst nations, two elements have mingled; the spirit of 
 propagandism and the spirit of conquest. We have learnt 
 the evil of both ; we desire no more of either. 
 
 The propagandism of truth by force is the corruption of 
 truth. Violence in the name of liberty is the ruin of liberty, 
 first for the victors, secondly for the vanquished. We are not 
 disciples of the Koran. We respect the ideas, sentiments, 
 institutions, and rights of others, as we wish others to respect 
 ours. We have faith in intelligence and in the times. We 
 aspire to give the world the spectacle of free, true, and general 
 civilisation, — of that civilisation towards which Europe ad- 
 vances through so many ages. We believe that this spectacle 
 is a great example, and sufficient for our greatness. 
 
 Peace is dear to us for the interest of national morality. 
 We ardently desire to see the spirit of order reign amongst 
 us, the family spirit, respect for law, and confidence in the
 
 HISTOEIC DOCUMENTS. 461 
 
 future. Above all, we honour intelligence, industry, and good 
 manners. We wish ambition to be regulated, souls to be 
 tranquillised, minds to be enlightened ; that in social life 
 there may be much activity and little hazard. 
 
 We confine ourselves solely to the course of public prosperity. 
 Thanks to Grod, it is already great, and increases daily. Our 
 agi'icvilture improves, our industry develops itself, our com- 
 merce expands ; but how far are we still from what we can 
 achieve, from what we ought to be ! Capital is not equal to 
 labour ; knowledge is not adequate to the good employment 
 of capital. In every case and class, whether the question is 
 of material or intellectual means, of public administration 
 or private affairs, how many gaps are to be filled up, how 
 much progress is still to be made ! Progress which ought to 
 j)enetrate in every quarter, to infuse itself into all conditions ; 
 which will never be truly satisfactory until all society takes 
 part in it, both in the labour and in the produce. 
 
 For all this we require peace, long settled peace. This, to- 
 day, is the universal conviction and desire. Europe wants 
 peace as well as France. In France, the country wants peace 
 as well as the king's government. One of the noblest claims 
 of our monarchy to public gratitude is its constancy in 
 the policy of peace. And if I may be permitted to speak of 
 myself in such weighty matters, I also have constantly 
 associated myself with the same policy ; I also have pro- 
 claimed and practised in this respect, and under the severest 
 trials, the most unyielding conviction. 
 
 But it is not enough to desire ; it is not enough even to 
 will. Such is the weakness of man, that against his thought, 
 against his wish, he may be led, by his own acts and errors, 
 to the very result he most dreads, and anxiously endeavours 
 to avoid. 
 
 This is the danger to which the cabinet of the 15th of 
 April exposes us. This is the consequence of its policy. It 
 compromises peace in place of securing it.
 
 462 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 Peace may be compromised in two ways. By a weak 
 policy, unworthy of and injurious to the national honour ; 
 
 By an improvident, unskilful policy, which conducts affairs 
 badly. 
 
 France is jealous, extremely jealous, of her national dignity 
 and of her attitude in the world. Let us be thankful that she 
 is so ! Public, popular susceptibility, that sudden electrical 
 feeling, somewhat blind, but powerful and devoted, constitutes 
 the honour and greatness of democratic societies. It is through 
 that sentiment, in spite of their inconsistencies and weak- 
 nesses, that they elevate]themselves and resound brilliantly when 
 once that noble fibre is touched. And let the government 
 believe this thoroughly. The fibre may appear slackened and 
 sluggish, but it may also become suddenly excited and shaken, 
 and shake everything with its own agitation. You love peace ; 
 you desire peace. Be careful of the national dignity ; give 
 it full satisfaction and security. If it doubts and suspects, do 
 you also doubt and tremble for peace. The blessings of peace 
 are great and gratifying, but a free country will not long 
 purchase them at the cost of moral suffering and offensive 
 uncertainty. 
 
 It is moreover a position so desirable, an increase of power 
 so important for the government, to sympathise with the na- 
 tional pride, and to use it as a buckler ! What embarrassments 
 will it not escape, what questions will it not solve through 
 this medium ! On all occasions, at every instant, the 
 foreigners with whom you have to deal, watch you and feel 
 your pulse. Let them know that you are proud and deter- 
 mined; — they measure, they restrain their words and acts. 
 But if they find and look upon you as timid, irresolute, dis- 
 posed to evade and yield, do you believe that they will offer 
 you better conditions, or treat you with more consideration ? 
 Quite the contrary. They will insist, press, and annoy. 
 They will care little to transact busisess with you ; they will 
 hold you in light esteem ; and peace clogged \nth. embarrass-
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 463 
 
 ments, questions, vexations, and disgusts, will gradually be- 
 come more difficult and troublesome, and will find itself in 
 peril, do what you may to maintain it. 
 
 What will be the result if, in other respects, affairs are con- 
 ducted with thoughtlessness and improvidence, under the 
 control of first impressions, with the sole end of escaping 
 from the difficulty of the moment ; of contriving an evasive 
 answer, of temporarily saving appearances ; without that power 
 of attention and memory which keeps an account of all facts; 
 without that prudent maturity of design which prevents 
 incautious measures, and never sacrifices the security of the 
 future to the convenience of the present? 
 
 Do you believe, my dear Sir, that on such conditions, with 
 such conduct, in presence of the national dignity saddened 
 and wounded, in the midst of affairs rashly commenced, and 
 becoming hourly more complicated, peace can be either strong 
 or sure ? Do you believe that this can be the true policy of 
 the country? 
 
 Examine facts — recent — proved facts. They speak more 
 loudly than I can. They display everywhere, in our foreign 
 relations, the weakness, improvidence, thoughtlessness of the 
 cabinet, and their dangerous consequences. They exhibit 
 peace incessantly compromised and on the point of escaping us. 
 
 In Switzerland, to remove from our frontier a young mad- 
 man, a division of the army has been put in motion ; and we 
 have seen ourselves placed at the mercy of Louis Bonaparte 
 and the radicals of Thurgovia, who, with fifteen days of 
 obstinacy, were perfectly in a position to compel us to make 
 war upon a friendly and valuable neighbour. 
 
 Wherefore ? 
 
 Because the cabinet had neglected to maintain, in our 
 relations with that neighbour, our sound and natural policy, — 
 the policy adopted by its predecessors. Because it had 
 commenced and conducted its remonstrances against the resi- 
 dence of Louis Bonaparte in Switzerland, hastily, confusedly,
 
 464 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 witliout discretion or foresight, in a manner offensive to 
 Switzerland, and which left neither to the Eepublic nor to 
 us any honourable or pacific road through which to escape 
 from the embarrassment. 
 
 In Belgium, matters proceeded to the last extremity. Eevo- 
 lutionary passions were placed in movement; the Belgian 
 people and their king found themselves engaged, compro- 
 mised, and placed between an impossible resistance and an 
 unworthy retreat. 
 
 Wlierefore ? 
 
 Because, from the beginning of the affair, our cabinet 
 dared not adopt a firm and clear resolution ; because it had 
 no influence in Europe, if that could have prevailed in the 
 question of territory, to obtain favourable modifications for 
 Belgium ; and if not, to determine promptly the execution 
 of the treaty, and to spare the Belgians the deplorable alter- 
 native to which they are now reduced, or ourselves the humili- 
 ating attitude we hold ; — serious inconveniences, and perhaps 
 important dangers to both. 
 
 In Mexico we have reaped success and glory ; but the suc- 
 cess and glory have settled nothing. Our countrymen are 
 ill-treated, oppressed, persecuted, and banished by the Mexi- 
 can government more violently than ever; the contest has 
 become more bitter, and the issue more obscure; we are 
 drawn into an enterprise infinitely greater than its motive 
 and object, the means, sacrifices, and termination of which are 
 equally difficult to calculate. We are engaged in a war more 
 than two thousand leagues from home, in face of deserts and 
 savages, and equally undecided whether to advance or retreat. 
 
 "WTierefore ? 
 
 Because the cabinet neglected to calculate the difficulties 
 of the enterprise ; because, from the beginning, it has allowed 
 operations to languish from want of suflficient and well-com- 
 bined means ; because it has failed to engage, on our side, 
 the gi-eat commercial nations, England and the United States,
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 465 
 
 for instance, whose interests there are analogous with ours ; 
 but on the contrary have placed us, with regard to those 
 nations, in a very delicate position, which becomes more 
 delicate from delay. 
 
 Thus, in every direction, our affairs are complicated and 
 aggravated. Peace has been compromised; war has emanated 
 from that cause, or has been, or still is, on the point of 
 springing up. 
 
 And for a great people, for France, there are no means 
 of avoiding these complications. We cannot retire from all 
 quarters, as from Ancona, and isolate ourselves like the little 
 republic of San Marino. France is present and interested 
 everywhere; everjnvhere when a question arises, when an 
 event occurs, we must be present and act. Everywhere and 
 always, you desire peace : you are right ; peace is most 
 desirable : to break it now, vast reasons are required, reasons 
 of national honour and security. But peace, the peace which 
 becomes France, is a lofty and laborious work, requiring 
 much activity, courage, foresight, ascendancy ; which has its 
 contests and demands its glory, like war. If you are weak 
 and imprudent, truckling and unskilful ; if you know not how 
 to solve questions by negotiation or by arms ; if you leave 
 them to rise up lightly, or to establish themselves profoundly, 
 by showing yourselves equally incapable of supporting or pre- 
 venting, of removing or unravelling them, speak no longer 
 of peace ; cease to call yourselves ministers of peace : you are 
 not more fitted for peace than for war ; you profane the name 
 of peace; you compromise its existence. Instead of owing 
 you anything, it is by you and through you that peace debases 
 itself and declines. 
 
 I pause, my dear Sir; for our country, in the natural dis- 
 turbance under which it still suffers after so many rude 
 shocks, dreads the energetic expression of even the most 
 moderate sentiments, and pictures exaggeration in the lan- 
 guage of every strong conviction. But rest assured that
 
 466 HISTORIC documents. 
 
 light and pusillanimous policy is not the policy of peace, and 
 that in the hands of the cabinet of the 15th of April peace is 
 not more in safety than is our national honour. 
 
 GuizoT. 
 
 3. S'peech delivered by M. Ouizot in the Electoral College of 
 Lisieux, on the SrcZ of March, 1839, immediately after his 
 election* 
 
 Grentlemen, 
 
 You have conferred on me a great honour : I thank you 
 for it with profound gratitude. I see in this more than a 
 personal success : I perceive in it a sanction of the conduct I 
 have held in these latter times, a proof that I have judged 
 soundly and acted well. 
 
 And do not believe, gentlemen, that I have acted incon- 
 siderately. I have watched long and maturely deliberated. 
 It is not by choice that I have placed myself at variance 
 with the government I love and have served, which I still 
 intend to serve, now and always. I foresaw the consequences 
 of this division, the evil interpretations, the insults, the 
 calumnies, and what touches me more nearly, perhaps, the 
 sincere disapprobation of some of my oldest friends, estimable 
 men, for having marched in concert with whom so long, I 
 take honour to myself, and whose sympathy mil ever be dear 
 to me. 
 
 Nevertheless, I have not hesitated ; I beheld two urgent 
 
 and decisive points. 
 
 I saw, within, the weakness of our representative govern- 
 ment, especially in the Chamber of Deputies; that is to say, 
 of the influence of France in her own affairs. 
 
 Without, I saw the deterioration of our attitude, of our 
 acts and alliances ; that is to say, the deterioration of the 
 influence of France in the affairs of Europe. 
 
 * M. Gviizot had 477 votes in this college out of 525 voters.
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 467 
 
 And as a consequence to this prolonged change of national 
 policy, I perceived a lamentable and perhaps dangerous re- 
 action. 
 
 Experience, gentlemen, is not wanting to us. We know 
 how governments engaging in an erroneous path, gradually- 
 become compromised, and end by losing themselves, ever sur- 
 rounded by friends, but blind and weak friends, who are unable 
 to guide or restrain them. This is no general idea or vague 
 reminiscence. We have seen it. We shall not see it again. 
 We have a double guarantee against it, — the wisdom of the 
 King and the wisdom of the country. But this wisdom 
 consists precisely in noting and pointing out, in good time, 
 the deviation and the danger. 
 
 It is on the brink of the abyss that we ought, and are able 
 to pause. It is the merit of free governments, it is the duty 
 of good citizens in free governments, to combat the evil as 
 soon as it appears, to repulse it before it augments. Our 
 readiness to become alarmed and fortified for the present, 
 constitutes our security for the future. 
 
 Do you also know, gentlemen, who would suffer most from 
 the reaction necessarily produced by the enfeeblement of oiu: 
 institutions, and the change of our national policy ? Grovern- 
 ment, and power. They would be held accountable, and by 
 them the penalty would be paid. You would see the prin- 
 ciples and resources of government become weakened in 
 their turn. You would see revive in the country the desire 
 for extensive guarantees, for precautions which enervate and 
 disarm authority. We require authority to be strong, and I 
 fear its deficiencies, at least as much for the mistrusts they 
 inspire as for the inunediate evil they produce. 
 
 This is what has determined my conduct, gentlemen ; these 
 are my reasons for opposing the cabinet. As I have had the 
 honour to tell you, just now, I did not dissemble to myself 
 the difficulties of such a position. I did not flatter myself 
 that it would be at once understood and universally approved.
 
 4(j8 historic documents. 
 
 But I hoped that a long session, numerous and varied 
 debates, would bring it to general light. It has not been so. 
 An abrupt and unexpected dissolution has as suddenly- 
 brought before you, gentlemen, and before the country at 
 large, questions scarcely enunciated and still obscure. I 
 have dreaded, and freely acknowledge, mischievous conse- 
 quences. I have apprehended one of two evils, both suffi- 
 ciently serious, — the irritation or weakness of the country. 
 I feared lest it should go beyond the mark or ignore the 
 danger. 
 
 I have resumed confidence, gentlemen, for what has taken 
 place in this district, what you have just done cannot be 
 an isolated fact. It is undoubtedly, a symptom and type of 
 what is now taking place throughout France. A majority will 
 declare itself, a decided and powerful majority, stronger and 
 more influential than it has ever been. Never, gentlemen, 
 during nine years, and allow me to feel proud of the fact, 
 have I ever received from you so many votes. And this strong 
 majority is not an impulse of passion, the effect of enthu- 
 siastic party spirit ; it is, on the contrary, as conciliatory as 
 decisive ; it rallies, I would say, if I dared, nearly all the 
 sincere friends of our revolution of 1830, of our monarchy 
 of 1830, of the Charter and dynasty of 1830. Divided for 
 several years, to-day they approach and unite. 
 
 Gentlemen, there is yet another point which touches me 
 nearly. What is the pressing, the evident necessity of our 
 epoch ? What is the method, the only method by which to 
 fix a term to our embarrassments and to the dangers of our 
 situation ? Precisely that which you are now adopting : a 
 majority at once decided and not exclusive, powerful and 
 conciliatory. 
 
 A decided majority is indispensable to the strength and 
 moral influence of our constitution, to the strength and 
 moral power of government itself. We suffer, we decline to- 
 gether for five years, chambers and cabinets, authority and
 
 HISTORIC DOCUIMENTS. 469 
 
 liberty, through those narrow, floating majorities, which take 
 from government all fixity, elevation, and ascendancy, to con- 
 fer on miserable intrigues and paltry interests a lamentable 
 and ridiculous importance. 
 
 For five years there has been much talk of conciliation. 
 It is a powerful and a soothing word, which all parties have 
 endeavoured to appropriate. I also, gentlemen, love and 
 desire conciliation. I have ever contested for a moderate 
 policy, a policy which considers and reconciles all rights and 
 interests. And when I examine myself, I find nothing, 
 absolutely nothing which should render conciliation difficult 
 to me. I carry within me no violent or bitter feelings. I hate 
 no one ; I have injured no one. I defy any man in France 
 to say that I have ever been guided by evil Avishes or per- 
 sonal resentment. I have learnt from experience to com- 
 prehend and explain much ; and I believe that the energy of 
 conviction does not exclude some degree of impartiality in 
 the judgment and of benevolence in the heart. 
 
 But, gentlemen, whenever I hear conciHation named, I 
 consider two things ; public security, and my individual 
 dignity. 
 
 As long as the state appeared to me in danger ; as long as 
 I saw the King and the Charter menaced and attacked ; and 
 as often as conciliation has seemed to be proposed as the 
 price of a disavowal of the policy of resistance, which saved 
 both in evil days, I neither wished nor ought to lend myself 
 
 to it. 
 
 Such was the state of things, gentlemen, in 1834, 1835, 
 and 1836. These were the times of Fieschi, of Alibaud, of 
 Meiinier, of the conspiracy of Strasbourg ; times assuredly of 
 struggle and danger ; times which demanded a vigilant and 
 enero-etic policy, the policy of the 13th of March, and of the 
 11th of October. I have not abandoned it. You would not, 
 gentlemen, have counselled me to do so. What do I say? 
 You would not have forgiven it. You are vigilant for the 
 
 VOL. IV. I I
 
 470 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 security of the government of July ; you are jealous of the 
 honour of your deputy. I have preserved both. I feel 
 confident of your approbation. 
 
 Times are changed. The safety of the state is no longer 
 threatened. Eesistance has borne its fruits. The King 
 and the Charter breathe freely under the shelter of the 
 laws and of the public sentiment. Questions have arisen, 
 foreign to our old debates, relative to the reality of our insti- 
 tutions, the dignity of our foreign policy, and the judicious 
 conduct of our affairs ; — questions on which I have nothing 
 to disavow ; a free and elevated ground on which a true and 
 honom-able conciliation may take place. I lend myself -to it 
 with eagerness. Therein lies the principle of a numerous 
 and reconciling majority, which can concentrate the sincere 
 friends of the government of July, without fixing on any 
 of them the charge of weakness or falsification. Much is said 
 of the coalition. Grentlemen, observe what passes amongst 
 yom'selves in this district, in this college. Has any one 
 renounced his opinions, his antecedents, his friends? Do 
 you feel guilty of defection or hypocrisy ? No, certainly 
 not ; you are consistent with yourselves ; faithful to all that 
 you have thought, done, loved, and served. Yet, neverthe- 
 less, you have approached each other. You think, you vote in 
 unison, under the empire of the same idea, the same convic- 
 tion : attachment to representative government, to its dig- 
 nity and vigour, to the desire of seeing it real and effective. 
 Such is the coalition, gentlemen ; there is no other. That 
 which has taken place amongst you, naturally, usefully, and 
 morally, is the same which has been accomplished in the 
 Chamber. In all respects equally legitimate and honourable, 
 it will, I hope, be everywhere equally salutary : it will every 
 where restore to our institutions their truth and energy ; it 
 will every where become the source of true parliamentary 
 majorities by leaving to all the honour of our past and the 
 liberty of our future.
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 471 
 
 Greutlemen, in what I do and require to-day there is 
 nothing new or strange to me. I am faithful, strictly faithful, 
 to what I have always done and required. Nearly three years 
 ago, in August 1836, in this place, many amongst you did 
 me the honour of inviting me to a banquet. I then deli- 
 vered a speech to which the press and the tribune have often 
 referred. I gladly seized that opportunity of doing homage 
 to the wisdom of the King ; of recalling the eminent, the im- 
 mense services, rendered by the King to France in the cause 
 of order and peace, ^^^lat I then said I should repeat, I do 
 repeat still, with the same conviction, the same gratitude. 
 And- then I also said : 
 
 " To support the King is not to leave all on his hands. 
 Our adhesion ought not to be passive, ineffective, a mere 
 adhesion of spectators. The King can do nothing without 
 the country ; his firmness needs the support of our firmness ; 
 his wisdom draws its strensfth from our wisdom. Let not 
 the national majority, which has so well sustained the King 
 in the policy of a judicious medium, relax, disunite, or 
 give way to discouragement: let it openly manifest its 
 thought and boldly exercise its influence. Penetration, vigi- 
 lance, perseverance, and energy, are its imperious duties. 
 Let them be fulfilled. The perils of the King will con- 
 tinually remove to a greater distance with the perils of 
 France. Liberty, real and universal liberty, will gradually 
 develop itself, and we shall see the security of the people and 
 the throne, the dignity of the country and the influence of 
 power establish themselves together." 
 
 What did I intend by these words, gentlemen, if not to 
 demand the realization, the actual energy of representative 
 government, the influence of the Chamber of Deputies in the 
 affairs of the country, the influence of a strong, active, becom- 
 ing majority in the Chamber of Deputies? Never, gentle- 
 men, for a single minute have I deserted that noble cause ; 
 never have I supposed our institutions to become enervated, 
 
 ii2
 
 472 msTomc documents. 
 
 eluded, deteriorated ; never have I admitted that an adminis- 
 tration without principles or vigour could represent the true 
 government of the country. Under such attributes I no 
 longer recognise the proud and free government we won by 
 conquest in 1830. I wish to see it complete and regular. 
 I believe that its security and honour reside in the energetic 
 development, in the constant equilibrium of all its elements. 
 I wish to see them increase and strengthen, and all in con- 
 cert. To-day, gentlemen, as in 1836, as at all times, I 
 exclaim. Long live the King I Long live the Charter ! This 
 is the rallying cry of our country.
 
 473 
 
 No. XIV. 
 
 (Page 304.) 
 King Louis-Philijppe to M. Guizot. 
 
 Sunday, 2 o'clock, March 24:th, 1839, 
 
 At the moment when I believed that all was on the point 
 of being settled, all is broken off, and the Marshal has just 
 announced to me that he retires. I wish most anxiously to 
 see you, to hear and talk with you on this subject. Come 
 then to me as soon as you possibly can. 
 
 I i3
 
 474 
 
 No. XV. 
 
 (Pago 319.) 
 
 Signatures to the Letter addressed to M. Guizot, by twenty- 
 Jive American citizens, on the 1st of February, 1841. 
 
 E. S. Burd, Tho. van Zandt, Jared Sparks, Matthew Mor- 
 gan, Eugene Avail, M. Brimmer, F. P. Corbin, Eobert Walsh, 
 Andrew Eitchie, Herman Thom, Eobert Baird, Gras. M. 
 Gibbs; Leonard Hoods, Professor of Brunswick College, 
 INIaine ; Henry Seybert, E. N. Gibbes, H. L. Preston, M, 
 Smiller, H. G. Dyar, Charles J. Biddle, E. C. Biddle, J. Ean- 
 dolph, J. Archer, W. van Eeusselaer, Tho. Warner, Alex, van 
 Eeusselaer.
 
 475 
 
 No. XVI. 
 
 (rage 320.) 
 
 1. Baron de Bourqueney to Marshal SoulV. 
 
 Lotidon, May 25th, 1839, 
 Marshal, 
 
 As I announced to your Excellency yesterday, Lord Pal- 
 merston has communicated without delay to all the members 
 of the council, the news of the renewal of hostilities between 
 the Turkish and Egyptian armies. This evening, at the 
 Queen's ball. Lord Melbourne, Lord Lansdowne, and Lord 
 Normanby, all three mentioned to me the serious aspect 
 with which they regard this event. They sought, neverthe- 
 less, to persuade themselves still that the intelligence could 
 not be perfectly correct, and they founded their opinion on 
 the contrast it presents with that which preceded it from 
 Constantinople and Alexandria. Although I concealed my 
 communication as carefully as possible, it had already trans- 
 pired. During the evening, Redschid Pacha, who was this 
 day to take leave of the Queen, being informed by Lord 
 Palmerston, announced openly that he had suspended his 
 departure. Count Orloff was also aware of the news, and 
 without commenting on the consequences, proclaimed its 
 importance with affectation. 
 
 Lord Palmerston expressed a desire to see me again to 
 day. We have had a fresh conference, which lasted two 
 hours. Time will not permit me to forward a detailed 
 
 ii4
 
 476 IIISTOIUC DOCmiENTS. 
 
 account of it to your Excellency, but I prefer confining 
 myself to the leading points of the conversation to the post- 
 ponement of a more complete analysis. 
 
 Lord Palmerston had just received a despatch from Lord 
 Grranville, which entirely confirms that which I communi- 
 cated to him yesterday, and which adds also that the intelli- 
 gence had reached Malta from two different points, Syria 
 and Alexandria. We have therefore discarded the doubts of 
 yesterday, and the evil being admitted, nothing now remains 
 but to consider the remedy. 
 
 Lord Palmerston commenced by declaring that he was 
 going to submit to me his personal views on the state of 
 the question, that on Monday he should lay them before 
 the council, but that nothing could be definitively decided 
 before the arrival of answers from Paris. It is unnecessary 
 to add, that throughout this long conversation I took care 
 to represent myself as entirely without instructions, so that 
 nothing I said could even in the .most remote degree be 
 construed into the authorized expression of my government. 
 
 Lord Palmerston at once laid down a h^^othesis, from 
 which flows the entire current of the ideas he has adopted. 
 " I assume for point of departure," he said, " that the 
 object of our common policy is the support of the Ottoman 
 empire, as the least objectionable guarantee for the main- 
 tenance of the European equilibrium. There is here, as in 
 France, a certain amount of opinion favourable to the deve- 
 lopment of Egyptian power. This opinion the English cabinet 
 by no means partakes in, but it forms one of the many 
 difficulties we have to encounter in the path of Eastern 
 affairs. 
 
 " The preservation of the Ottoman empire being admitted 
 as our end, we have to i3rotect it against its friends and 
 enemies. 
 
 " The actual event surprises and leaves us in ignorance as 
 to Avhat we have to fear from the friends of the Ottoman
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 477 
 
 empire. This is an eventuality we shall have to ward off 
 at a later period. Let us begin with the enemies. 
 
 "The act of aggression (attributed to the Turks by the 
 latest telegraph) has its moral importance, for there is a 
 principle of justice, the power of which we cannot deny, 
 in a first disposition to retort the consequences of war on 
 the aggressor; but we must at the same time remember 
 that we never became a guaranteeing party to the arrange- 
 ments of Kutaieh ; that we have never, by any act, obliterated 
 the quality of vassal in the conqueror or of sovereign in 
 the conquered : we have yielded to the pressure of things ; 
 these things being changed, we are now bound to inquire 
 to what point the sovereign has a right to repossess himself 
 by arms of what the arms of the vassal have wrested from 
 him. 
 
 " Let us pass by the fact of aggression, and suppose it to 
 be decided in favour of Egypt. We can neither desire that 
 the victorious Pacha. should again reduce the Ottoman em- 
 pire to the brink of ruin, and force it to throw itself into 
 the arms of Russia; nor that the Sultan, excited by past 
 successes (very doubtful ones !) should leave the peace of 
 Europe in danger as long as it may please him to dispute 
 with the Pacha his recent conquests, and perhaps his old 
 possessions. 
 
 " Our first duty then is to arrest, as soon as possible, the 
 collision so unfortunately precipitated. With what means 
 of action, and within what limits ? 
 
 " The means of action may be of two kinds ; ships of war, 
 and troops for disembarkation. I know not whether it 
 would fall within the views of the French government to 
 despatch an expeditionary corps to the theatre of passing 
 events. Occupied as we ourselves are in India and America, 
 we could not appear there Avith a sufiicient force in avail- 
 able time. This last condition would also apply to the 
 military intervention of France ; for an expeditionary force
 
 478 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 ought at least to amount to fifteen thousand men, who could 
 not be assembled and embarked in less than from two to 
 three months. There remain, then, the sqviadrons. They 
 are on the spot, and can be quickly reinforced. We have 
 eight ships of the line in the Archipelago, and two in the 
 Tagus. Our united fleets are sufficient for all maritime 
 events. 
 
 " The instructions to our admirals ought to provide for two 
 contingencies ; whether, in presenting themselves on the 
 coast'of Syria they would find the Pacha victorious, or arrive 
 to be present at his defeat. 
 
 " If the advantage remained with the arms of the Pacha, our 
 admirals should be empowered to order him to pause in the 
 position in which he might find himself on their arrival, 
 under the threat of seeing his communications with Alexan- 
 dria cut o£f, and all supplies by sea rendered thenceforward 
 impossible. A sufficient number of ships should at the same 
 time appear before Alexandria, declare the port in a state of 
 blockade until Ibraham received the orders of his father to 
 suspend his victorious march, prevent the egress of the 
 Egyptian fleet should it be in the harbour, and interdict 
 its return if at sea, until the acceptance of the proposed 
 conditions. 
 
 " If the Ottoman army has commenced by a success, the 
 same intimation should be conveyed to the Pacha in com- 
 mand ; our admirals would have to use all their influence to 
 restrain him from pushing his advantages beyond a boundary 
 to be fixed in common, and to announce to him that they 
 should instantly demand instructions from their government 
 in the event of their representations being disregarded. 
 During this time the efforts of our united embassies at Con- 
 stantinople should be exerted without intermission to bring 
 back and confine the Sultan within the limits of a wise 
 moderation." 
 
 Such, Marshal, in a few words, is the naval action to be
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 479 
 
 adopted by the two powers, according to the recommendation 
 of Lord Palmerston ; this is what he intends to propose to 
 the council on Monday, and this he submits to the conside- 
 ration of the King's government. He added, as a necessary 
 accompaniment, that to be effectual, their action should be 
 immediate, and that not a moment is to be lost in combining 
 the movements of our fleets, and preparing the instructions 
 to our admirals. 
 
 I now pass on to the diplomatic action : — 
 
 Lord Palmerston is of opinion that we should, without 
 delay, present ourselves at Vienna as entirely united in inten- 
 tions and efforts for the maintenance of the Ottoman empire ; 
 that we should frankly avow the object we propose to accom- 
 plish, and that we should press for the co-operation of Austria 
 by every means in her power. A similar step should at the 
 same time be taken at Berlin. 
 
 " Here, again," Lord Palmerston resumed, " we have two 
 contingencies to provide against. The Porte may already 
 have implored and received the aid of Eussia in men and 
 ships ; or, they may have been demanded and Russia may 
 hesitate to comply. 
 
 "In the first case we should propose to the Austrian 
 cabinet to join with us in declaring that Western Europe 
 demands, in the name of the European equilibrium, that 
 the Russian auxiliary troops should immediately return to 
 their own territory after having accomplished their mission, 
 and without any conquests being obtained by Russia, or any 
 stipulations for political or commercial advantages. This 
 declaration, in whatever terms it might be couched, should 
 be peremptory to the point, and should leave Russia in no 
 doubt whatever as to the consequences to which a line of 
 conduct in opposition to that of the allies would inevitably 
 expose her. 
 
 " In the second case, we should press the court of Vienna 
 to propose with us to St. Petersburg a preliminary concert
 
 480 HISTORIC DOCUIMEN.TS. 
 
 between the five great powers, the object of which would be 
 the maintenance of the Ottoman empire, and the action to 
 be determined in common. We should then arrange the 
 auxiliary interference of Eussia, and confine it within the 
 limits of a common understanding. 
 
 " Under these two hypotheses, we shall extenuate, as much 
 as lies in our power, the disastrous effects on the destinies of 
 the Ottoman empire, of being committed solely to Russia.'' 
 
 I have given you the most faithful summary which my 
 memory can suppl}^, of my two conferences Avith Lord Pal- 
 merston, and I believe that I have conveyed to you his exact 
 ideas. I venture to request that your Excellency will enable 
 me, as soon as possible, to make knowTi to him the opinion 
 of the King's government. 
 
 Deign to accept, &c. 
 
 BOUEQUENEY. 
 
 2. Marshal Soult to Baron de Bourqueney. 
 
 Sir, Pai-is, June 13th, 1839. 
 
 We have not yet received the letters arrived by the last 
 packet-boat from the east, but a telegraphic despatch from 
 Marseilles, inserted in the Aloniteur, proves that at the most 
 recent date, notwithstanding a brawl between the Turkish 
 and Egyptian soldiers, the fears of a collision between the 
 two armies had not yet been realised. The time which 
 passes mil undoubtedly strengthen the hope we may be per- 
 mitted to build, for the maintenance of peace, upon a concert 
 between all the great European powers. 
 
 The reception given at Berlin, and more particularly at 
 Vienna, to our first overtures for the accomplishment of a 
 mutual accord to secure this object, is of the most satisfactory 
 nature. The Prussian cabinet, placed as it is in a secondary 
 position as to all that regards the East, could only show
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 481 
 
 itself disposed to support, according to its means, the efforts 
 of its allies ; but that of Vienna, whose situation is totally 
 different, has not hesitated to declare itself frankly and 
 categorically on the arrangements indispensably called for in 
 this serious emergency. Count Appony has received orders 
 to communicate to me a fully developed despatch, in which 
 M. de Metternich explains, with his habitual diplomatic for- 
 malities, the view he has adopted on this important point. 
 He commences by admitting that, in the present state of 
 things, a statu quo, the source of so much anxiety, and 
 almost equally objectionable to the two contending parties, 
 is a matter of the utmost difficulty. If it could be solved by 
 the restoration of Syria to the authority of the Porte, by the 
 sole effort of the Turkish arms, he would approve of the 
 solution ; but he regards this as more than improbable, and 
 believes that in the contest that might ensue, all chances 
 would be in favour of Mehemet Ali. In this position of 
 affairs, and without prejudice to the proposed negotiations 
 for a definitive settlement, he agrees with us in opinion that 
 the great courts ought to come to an understanding, with the 
 object of preventing hostilities, if possible ; of terminating 
 them if they have commenced; and of reconciling, while 
 admitting the power of existing facts, the reasonable claims 
 of the two parties by an arrangement which may secure the 
 future, while checking the exaggerated pretensions of both. 
 Admitting, as indisputable axioms, that the powers neither 
 desire the dethronement of the Sultan, nor admit the possi- 
 bility of expelling Mehemet Ali from Egypt, and finally that 
 not one of them seeks to aggrandise itself at the expense of 
 the Ottoman empire, he concludes from these premises that 
 it will be easy for them to agree, and repeats that they hold 
 in their hands all that is necessary to give weight to their 
 determination. French and English fleets are in the Medi- 
 terranean ; land and sea forces are not wanting to Russia ; a 
 firm and uniform language at Alexandria and Constantinople,
 
 482 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 seconded by the attitudes, equally imposing but expectant, 
 assumed by the combined squadrons, would in all probability 
 suffice, according to M. de Metternich, to secure success to 
 the mediation of the powers. Such is the substance of the 
 despatch communicated to me by Count Appony. It con- 
 eludes with an observation which has struck me, as I see in 
 it the timid apparition of an idea, ever fondly cherished by the 
 Austrian cabinet and as constantly rejected by Kussia, — that 
 of establishing, in the capital of Austria, a conference on the 
 affairs of the East. Vienna, says M. de Metternich, is, with 
 regard to the great question in debate, a point so central that 
 answers may reach it from all quarters at the same time. 
 
 Communications similar to that contained in the despatch 
 written by Count Appony have been transmitted to St. 
 Petersburg, to Vienna, and to Berlin 
 
 As soon as I learn anything further, I shall hasten to let 
 you know, for the information of Lord Palmerston. 
 
 3. Marshal Soult to Baron de Bourqueney. 
 
 Paris, June 17th, 1839. 
 
 • ••••••*•«• 
 
 My preceding despatch has acquainted you with the answer 
 of the cabinet of Vienna to our first communications . . . 
 
 The intelligence brought three days since by the packet- 
 boat from the East, comprises no news of the slightest im- 
 portance. The armies were still facing each other on the 
 banks of the Euphrates, but nothing indicated a desire on 
 the part of their leaders to come to action . . . The Turks 
 can scarcely be in a condition to commence hostilities. Their 
 army, it is reported, does not exceed 36,000 men, weakened 
 by want of supplies and desertion. 
 
 The state of affairs, as it presents itself at this moment, is 
 quite sufficient to ju. tify serious anxiety. I am now going to
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 483 
 
 place you in a position to answer the questions addressed to 
 you by Lord Palmerston, as to the opinion formed by the 
 King's government on the measures to be adopted under the 
 exigencies of the moment. 
 
 The King's government comprehends the utility and con- 
 venience of an understanding between the great powers to 
 settle the means of securing, by a common attitude and 
 language, the maintenance of the Ottoman empii-e, and it 
 thinks the seat of the deliberations to be opened with this 
 object should be established at Vienna, as the most desirable 
 locality. 
 
 It . considers that to prevent hostilities, if they are still 
 suspended, or to bring them to an end if they have unhappily 
 commenced, the French and English fleets should operate as 
 a sort of armed mediation, commanding the sea, to contest 
 the movements of the Egyptian and Turkish armaments ; to 
 oblige them to return to their ports, in case they have issued 
 from them. 
 
 The English squadron appears to amount to six sail of the 
 liae, without counting smaller vessels. Ours >vill also be 
 increased to that number, and will include four or five frigates, 
 with four steamers, at the least, and other smaller vessels. 
 Six men-of-war are already collected at Smyrna, or on the 
 way there. Three others will sail for that place immediately. 
 It is important that instructions, not exactly common, but 
 dictated by the same idea, and previously arranged between 
 the two courts, should be forwarded without delay to the 
 officers commanding the two squadrons, to direct their opera- 
 tions. 
 
 As soon as it becomes known in the East that these forces 
 act in the same spirit and with a similar object, it is not 
 possible to believe that either the fleet of the Sultan or that 
 of the Pacha will be disposed to risk a conflict with them. 
 I go still further; this demonstration, by rendering war 
 almost impossible, will take from Russia all pretext for
 
 484 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 placing in movement her fleet at Sebastopol, or even her 
 land forces. 
 
 To attain more completely the end we have ^n view, per- 
 haps it would be desirable that the Austrian flag should 
 display itself in conjunction with the combined squadrons of 
 France and England. One or two frigates, with some lighter 
 ships, would suffice for that purpose. It is to be observed, 
 moreover, that M. de Metternich has already expressed his 
 opinion to that effect. 
 
 Such are the measures which I think should be at once 
 adopted, if we do not wish to be surprised by events. I now 
 pass on to those which, as soon as formal deliberations 
 are opened between the cabinets, might be put in force to 
 terminate the existing crisis and definitely to prevent its 
 renewal. 
 
 In the event of our resolutions and the attitude of our 
 squadrons not being able to prevent the two contending par- 
 ties from having recourse to arms, the necessity of a common 
 action would become evident ; and there is no reason to ex- 
 pect that we should then be able to induce Eussia to abstain 
 from material interference in a question in which her interests 
 would be so directly engaged. What we ought to insist on 
 is, that her action should be determined and lunited in con- 
 cert with the other courts ; that she should confine herself 
 to the course adopted by France and England ; and, in fact, 
 that a European convention should replace the stipulations 
 of Unkiar-Skelessi. I cannot estimate the full amount of 
 obstacles that such a project might encounter from the 
 cabinet of St. Petersburg. Nevertheless, it would find few 
 available arguments, however speciously they might be 
 set forward, by which to repulse combinations evidently pro- 
 ceeding from a desire for peace, and supported by all the 
 allies. 
 
 It remains for me to speak of the final object of this nego- 
 tiation, of the arrangement by which it would be possible to
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 485 
 
 place the Sultan and his powerful vassal in more satisfac- 
 tory relations with each other, and in a position offering 
 better security for the future repose of the East. 
 
 The importance of conceding to Mehemet Ali the investi- 
 ture of at least a part of his actual possessions seems now to 
 be almost unanimously admitted. It is felt, that at the point 
 of greatness he has reached, the necessity of assuring the 
 future fortunes of his family, and of placing it, after his 
 death, in security from the vengeance of the Porte, has too 
 strongly impressed itself upon his mind to suffer him to 
 entertain pacific notions until he has obtained satisfaction on 
 that leading point. 
 
 On the other hand, we cannot flatter ourselves with a hope 
 that the Porte will consent to yield to him this increase of 
 moral force, unless, by way of compensation, some advantage 
 is granted to itself which may furnish a material guarantee 
 against the eventual enterprises of an enemy whose power it 
 has thus augmented. The nature and extent of this advantage 
 is not easily determined. Lord Palmerston thinks that it 
 should not fall short of the entire restitution of Syria. 
 
 At Berlin, they seem to admit that the Sultan should con- 
 tent himself with merely a portion of that province. For 
 ovirselves, we acknowledge that the Porte has a claim to a 
 substantial compensation ; but we think that the moment for 
 fixing the exact proportion has not yet arrived ; that such a 
 question cannot be decided until after many important and 
 complicated data have been considered, the full appreciation 
 of which cannot be the work of a moment ; and that this point 
 ought to be referred to the concerted understanding, which, 
 if our views prevail, will be established between the powers. 
 You will have the goodness to let Lord Palmerston read the 
 present despatch. In thus laying open to the cabinet of 
 London, without reserve, the aspect under which we regard 
 the important circumstances of the moment, we offer it an 
 unequivocal pledge of the confidence with which it has 
 
 VOL. IV. K K
 
 486 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 inspired us, and of our desire to act in the most perfect 
 accordance. 
 
 4. Baron de Bourqueney to Marshal Soult. 
 
 Marshal, London, June 17th, 1839. 
 
 Yesterday Lord Palmerston wrote to request I would 
 call upon him, stating also that he wished to confer with me 
 on the affairs of the East. I repaired to him without delay. 
 I had abstained for several days from pressing too urgently 
 for an answer to the overtures which I was instructed by 
 your Excellency to make to the English cabinet ; but the 
 answer being announced, I considered it right to evince the 
 most eager anxiety to receive it from the lips of Lord Pal- 
 merston. 
 
 Lord Palmerston stated that the council had occupied 
 Saturday in deliberating on the affairs of the East, and that 
 he was authorized to communicate to me the result of that 
 consultation. He also added that Prince Esterhazy would 
 only be informed of it after me. 
 
 " Hitherto," Lord Palmerston began, " you have only 
 heard my personal impressions on the Eastern question. I 
 am now going to tell you the mature opinion of the Council ; 
 that opinion I beg you will convey to the knowledge of your 
 government, adding, -svith the transmission, that before acting 
 we shall wait its judgment on the question." 
 
 I shall now lay before you, in a faithful summary, all that 
 my memory has retained and my reason has classified on the 
 result of these deliberations of the Council. 
 
 The Council has thus decided : 
 
 That England is called on to proceed in strict uniformity 
 with France ; that everything is impossible without this 
 perfect understanding ; that, with it, all is easy, or at least
 
 HISTOEIC DOCUMENTS. 487 
 
 possible. The Council has divided the question into two 
 parts : 
 
 1. Immediate action in the event of a conflict having- 
 already commenced between the Turkish and Egyptian 
 armies. 2. The negotiation of such an arrangement as shall 
 render the renewal of this conflict impossible. 
 
 The immediate despatch of our combined squadrons to the 
 coast of Syria is considered indispensable. 
 
 Our admirals should be instructed, if they find hostilities 
 already commenced, to order the two generals in command 
 to arrest without delay the march of their armies, and to 
 extend the radius of distance which six weeks since separated 
 their respective advanced guards. This order should be 
 accompanied by a declaration in the name of their govern- 
 ments, that at Constantinople and Alexandria the great 
 powers had entered on a treaty of settlement calculated to 
 satisfy the just pretensions of both parties. 
 
 If the Turks refused to stop, the admirals should, without 
 a moment's delay, despatch two officers to Constantinople to 
 announce to our ambassadors the refusal of the commandant 
 of the Ottoman army to acquiesce in our suggestions, and 
 they would hold him responsible for such a serious infringe- 
 ment of the relations of the Porte with all the powers of 
 Europe. Our squadrons would maintain a strict look-out on 
 the coast of Syi'ia. 
 
 If the Egyptians slighted our summons, the admirals 
 should be instructed to intercept all supplies by sea, and to 
 detach a considerable portion of the fleet to Alexandria, 
 where we should appear in imposing force, and with the 
 threat of blockading the harbour in case Mehemet Ali refused 
 to suspend the advance of his son. 
 
 The Council is of opinion that this demonstration would 
 suffice to prevent hostilities from breaking out, or to arrest 
 their progress if they have already commenced. 
 
 K K 2
 
 488 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 Meanwhile, we should open negotiations at Constantinople 
 and Alexandria on the double basis of the establishment of 
 the hereditary right of the family of Mehemet Ali over 
 Egypt, and of the evacuation of Syria by the Egyptian troops. 
 The Council thinks that we should encounter no serious diffi- 
 culty at Constantinople, and that if any presented itself at 
 Alexandria, we should surmount it by convincing the Pacha 
 of our union. The Council has neither determined the place 
 nor details of negotiation ; it merely proposes the basis and 
 recognizes its indispensable necessity for securing the peace of 
 the world on a solid foundation. 
 
 To render this negotiation successful, the council relies 
 much on the efficacy of the co-operation of Austria ; but it 
 also considers that such co-operation should be governed 
 and led by the union of our two cabinets. Let a single 
 doubt arise at Vienna on that union, and all will evaporate in 
 words. 
 
 Finally, the Council has weighed the conjuncture under 
 which, unauthorized by events and even beyond the limits of 
 reasonable prevision, we might find the Eussians already 
 established at Constantinople, or in march towards the capital 
 of the Ottoman empire. This most important question has 
 been discussed here under the profound impression caused by 
 the phrase in your Excellency's despatch. No. 16: "I 
 fear that in London they may treat too lightly the idea 
 of a new Eussian expedition." The Council thinks that, 
 in this case, our combined squadrons should appear before 
 Constantinople as friends, if the Sultan accepted our 
 aid, and by force, if he refused it. The question of the 
 passage of the Dardanelles, in a military sense, has also 
 been debated. It is looked upon as practicable, but dan- 
 gerous, during the six winter months when the wind blows 
 from the Mediterranean ; during the six others it is con- 
 sidered easy, but with troops for disembarkation. I need not
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 489 
 
 add, that this last step is, if I may so express myself, an ex- 
 treme conjecture, but for the accomplishment of which it 
 rests with us alone to prevent the retractation of England. 
 
 Your Excellency has now before you an exact analysis of 
 the resolutions adopted by the Cabinet Council held the day 
 before yesterday. My despatch will convey them to you 
 before you receive a more direct and detailed communication 
 which Lord Palmerston is at this moment preparing. I 
 strongly represented the necessity of drawing up a plan of 
 instruction for the admirals; such points cannot be too 
 minutely defined. This plan will be communicated by Lord 
 GTranville to your Excellency. 
 
 Prince Esterhazy followed me at Lord Palmerston's. He 
 will have received the same overtures which were made to 
 me (perhaps with certain reservations). The Prince is full 
 of hope as to the success of the Turco-Egyptian negotiation. 
 
 The Eussian embassy listens, watches, but hesitates in its 
 action as in its language. There have been many Eussians in 
 London during the last month, and some amongst them high 
 in the confidence of the Emperor. I venture with timidity 
 an opinion hastily formed, but it appears to me that in that 
 quarter also they are not prepared for extreme measures. 
 
 I venture to entreat that your Excellency will acquaint me 
 as soon as possible with the opinion formed by the King's 
 government on the plan proposed by the British ministry. 
 That opinion will be decisive as to the march of events. 
 
 It is long since I have so thoroughly comprehended as I 
 now do the weight of France in the balance of Europe. 
 
 • •   • • • 
 
 Deign to accept, &c. 
 
 BOURQUENEY. 
 
 KK 3
 
 490 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 5. Baron de Bourqueney to Marshal Soult. 
 
 Marshal, London, June 20th, 1839. 
 
 I received yesterday the despatch (No. 23) which your 
 Excellency has done me the honour to address to me under 
 the date of June the 1 7th, with extracts from the latest corre- 
 spondence with St. Petersburg, Vienna, Berlin, Constantinople, 
 and Alexandria. I informed Lord Palmerston that I had a 
 communication to make to him on the part of the King's 
 government. He appointed an interview for the same day, but 
 the sitting of the House of Commons having commenced by 
 an important vote in which he was compelled to take part, 
 my visit was of necessity postponed until the day following. 
 
 My despatch (No. 53), which has crossed your Excellency's, 
 already contained an answer to the greater portion of the 
 questions on which you now direct me to call for the decision 
 of the English cabinet. My conference of this day enables 
 me to complete my information. 
 
 I placed your Excellency's despatch in Lord Palmerston's 
 hands, requesting him to read it himself, and to weigh well 
 its bearing and object. 
 
 Lord Palmerston, after having read the despatch, addressed 
 me in these words: — "We understand each other upon all 
 points; our accordance will be complete. Principle, end, 
 means of execution, all is full of reason, simplicity, and 
 clearness. This is not the communication of one government 
 to another ; call it rather an understanding between col- 
 leaofues, between members of the same cabinet." 
 
 I then requested Lord Palmerston to allow me to recapi- 
 tulate the points on which I perceived some diversities of 
 opinion, slight, in truth, but real, between the exposition of 
 the views of the King's government and that of the English 
 cabinet, as he had explained it to me in our last conversation. 
 
 I began with the instructions to the admirals. Lord
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 491 
 
 Palmerston had told me that Lord Granville was charged to 
 communicate to your Excellency a plan of instructions which 
 approached so clearly to the spirit and letter of the despatch 
 he had just perused, that he regarded the question of identity 
 as settled. I observed to him that our naval action was pro- 
 posed under the form of mediation, and consequently with 
 the character of impartiality suitable to that position, — that 
 is to say, that we should use the same language to the respec- 
 tive commandants of the Turkish and Egyptian fleets. Lord 
 Palmerston no longer appeared, as on the first day, opposed 
 to that plan. He added that in the plan of instructions trans- 
 mitted to Lord G-ranville for communication to your Excel- 
 lency, it was even proposed to separate the two fleets, and to 
 direct one on Constantinople, the other on Alexandria. Lord 
 Palmerston entirely coincides mth the opinion of your Excel- 
 lency on the advantage of thus vmiting the moral effect 
 which cannot fail to be produced in the East and elsewhere 
 by this imposing development of our maritime power. 
 
 Passing from the instructions to the admirals, to the 
 relative strength of the squadrons. Lord Palmerston evinced 
 sincere satisfaction at the increase we were hastening to 
 make to ours, and assured me that the English fleet, already 
 comprising eight sail of the line, would immediately be aug- 
 mented to ten, to which would be added four or five frigates, 
 three steamers, and a considerable number of light vessels. 
 
 Eeturning then to the very improbable contingency of 
 our squadrons, on their arrival on the coasts of Syria, finding 
 the Eussians already in march towards the scene of events. 
 Lord Palmerston repeated to me that the English cabinet 
 proposed that our admirals, after summoning the belligerent 
 parties to cease hostilities, should, through our ambassadors 
 at Constantinople, demand from the Porte the entrance of 
 our fleets into the Bosphorus. He added that he was unable 
 to imagine any pretext under which the Sultan could refuse 
 our aid, without unmasking such a submission to Kussian 
 
 K K 4
 
 492 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 influence as would compel us to adopt other methods, either 
 to share or oppose it. 
 
 But on this point I found Lord Palmerston much dis- 
 posed to admit, with your Excellency (and building also on 
 the correspondence from Petersburg and Vienna), that Kussia 
 would hesitate in any attempt to execute the treaty of 
 Unkiar-Skelessi, and that she is in no manner prepared for 
 a rupture with Western Europe. 
 
 We then reverted to the negotiation, the seat of which 
 your Excellency proposes to fix at Vienna, and the principles 
 and object of which are explained in the despatch. 
 
 Lord Palmerston, on the first point, that of fixing the seat 
 of negotiation, requested permission to expose frankly the 
 doubts he entertained. He stated that he had fears lest the 
 influence of Eussia should exercise itself more effectually at 
 Vienna on Prince Metternich, than on Count Appony in Paris, 
 or on Prince Esterhazy in London. In reply, I urged some 
 of the objections which naturally presented themselves to my 
 mind. I said that Prince Metternich would probably feel 
 flattered by the choice of Vienna as the place of negotiation ; 
 that this feeling would more readily dispose him to the co- 
 operation we sought ; that in a question not implicating the 
 policy of principle, and in which Austrian interests presented 
 themselves in full evidence as opposed to the interests of 
 Russia, Prince Metternich would himself be more controlled 
 at Vienna, than elsewhere, by an Austrian opinion very 
 strongly declared. Finally, I represented the central position 
 of Vienna, as a decisive argument in favour of the proposed 
 selection. Lord Palmerston ended by saying : " I have 
 thought quite openly before you. I see the for and against ; 
 and all things considered, I believe the for will carry it, but 
 I must consult the cabinet, and will acquaint you with its 
 decision." I expect that it will be favourable. 
 
 As to the general datum of the negotiation, that is to say, 
 the hereditary succession in the family of Mehemet AH, and
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 493 
 
 the territorial compensation to the Sultan, Lord Palmerston 
 repeated to me that the English cabinet entered completely 
 into the views of the King's government. The arrangement 
 of the limits of that territorial compensation will undoubt- 
 edly become a question of debate ; but Lord Palmerston wishes 
 me to assure your Excellency, that from the point of de- 
 parture to the end of the treaty, from the principle to the 
 execution, the most intimate understanding and concert 
 cannot cease to reign between the two cabinets. 
 
 You have here, Marshal, an exact analysis of the conver- 
 sation I held this morning with Lord Palmerston. 
 
 Lord Palmerston requested permission to communicate to 
 Lord Melbourne your Excellency's despatch. I felt it my 
 duty not to refuse this mark of confidence. 
 
 I pray you to accept, &c. Bouequeney. 
 
 6. Marshal Soult to Baron de Bourqueney. 
 
 Paris, June 27th, 1839. 
 
 The approbation given by the British cabinet to the plan 
 you were instructed to communicate to Lord Palmerston for 
 the settlement of the affairs of the East, a plan, which, in all 
 its parts, approaches so closely to the ideas which that 
 minister himself transmitted to us, has afforded warm satis- 
 faction to the King's government. We find an additional 
 pledge of concert in the instructions destined for Admiral 
 Stopford, the substance of which Lord Grranville has made 
 me acquainted with. The spirit in which they are conceived 
 is in general relation with our own views, as to the means of 
 solving the crisis which threatens the peace of the world. 
 You will judge of this by the conformity of the English in- 
 structions with those which our minister of Marine has this 
 day forwarded to Admiral Lalande. I enclose you a copy, 
 that you may place them under Lord Palmerston's eyes. We 
 have not thought it necessary to touch on a highly important
 
 49-i IIISTOIUC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 point, which might embarrass the arrangements of the British 
 Admiralty, — the hypothesis of the arrival of Russian forces 
 at Constantinople. Tliat hypothesis involves considerations 
 I am about to explain to you, and which I request you will 
 submit to the examination of Lord Palmerston. 
 
 It appears to us that in directing its attention solely to the 
 prolongation of the stay of the Russians after the retreat of 
 the Egyptian army, by referring to that epoch, and in re- 
 serving for that single contingency the measures to be. 
 adopted to obtain the passage of the Dardanelles for the 
 allied squadrons, the cabinet of London has not sufficiently 
 provided for the exigencies of the situation. We think that 
 at the moment of the arrival of the Russians at Constanti- 
 nople, the great interests of European equilibrium, and still 
 more, perhaps, the susceptibilities of public opinion, justly 
 exacting, would require that the English and French flags 
 should show themselves there also. We believe that, instead 
 of waiting the course of events, and of leaving to the am- 
 bassadors and admirals themselves the initiative and the 
 responsibility of the important events that may become 
 necessary, France and England ought, without losing a 
 moment, and obtaining, if possible, the assent of Austria, to 
 demand from the Porte the free passage of the Dardanelles 
 for their ships, at the same time when the Russian forces 
 reach the Bosphorus, so as to enable them to co-operate 
 together for the protection of the Sultan's throne. It is 
 certain that the Porte, if left to itself, could not fail to accept 
 joyfully the additional guarantees which would thus be 
 offered against the conflicting dangers to which its inde- 
 pendence and security are exposed. Should any external 
 influence, on the contrary, impel it to a refusal, such a re- 
 jection wovild be significant, and France and England would 
 then have to understand each other on the resolutions to be 
 mutually adopted in consequence. But I think that according 
 to the positive data we possess on this point, it would be pre-
 
 HISTOlllC DOCUMENTS. 495 
 
 mature to confide to the admirals eventual, and in some degree 
 hypothetical powers, which, under circumstances easily con- 
 ceived, might lead to serious and irremediable complications. 
 
 Let me know, I pray you, as soon as possible, what Lord 
 Palmerston thinks of this proposition. If the British cabi- 
 net feels disposed to adopt it, I am of opinion that not a 
 moment should be lost ; the least delay might deprive it of 
 all its value. 
 
 You have alreadyrlearned the commencement of hostilities 
 between the Turks and Egyptians. I send you an extract 
 from the despatch of M. Cochelet, which announces this deplo- 
 rable fact. It contains, in addition, the most complete and 
 peremptory refutation of the pretended grievances by which 
 the Porte endeavoured to fix on the viceroy the blame of 
 provocation. 
 
 At Constantinople they were still ignorant, up to the 
 seventh of this month, as to what was passing in Syria, but 
 intelligence was expected. The Ottoman fleet was preparing 
 to put to sea. I ought not to conceal from you that all 
 reports confirm the assertion of our ambassador as to the 
 influence exercised by Lord Ponsouby. 
 
 7. Marshal Soult to Baron de Bourqueney. 
 
 Paris, July 9th, 1839. 
 
 . . . The King's government has learned with much 
 satisfaction the consent of the cabinet of London to the proposi- 
 tion of a step being taken with the Porte to obtain the passage 
 of the Dardanelles for the squadrons of France and England, 
 in case the forces of another power should be invited to the 
 succour of Constantinople. The anxiety manifested by the 
 cabinet in preparing the necessary instructions for Lord 
 Ponsonby, furnishes an unequivocal pledge of the sincerity 
 and earnestness of its adhesion. Nevertheless, I know not
 
 496 msToiiic documents. 
 
 whether in London they have sufficiently considered the 
 importance of a complete understanding, in form as well as 
 in object, in a negotiation of so much moment and delicacy, 
 and which is about to be confided to two ambassadors whose 
 reciprocal antecedents unfortunately ill dispose them to a 
 perfect concert. To guard as much as possible against this 
 last inconvenience, I had prepared the draft of the subjoined 
 note, with the intention of communicating it previously to 
 the British cabinet, and of arranging its -adoption in mutual 
 accordance. As you will see, the leading idea is to impress 
 on the step of which it treats, a European character. I 
 request you to lay it before Lord Palmerston. It may so 
 happen that it arrives after the despatches to Lord Ponsonby 
 have been forwarded ; but if approved of by the British 
 government, supplementary instructions might be sent to 
 its representative. . . . M. de Sainte-Aulaire will acquaint 
 Prince Metternich with the mission entrusted to the two 
 ambassadors, and he will endeavour to associate the Austrian 
 internuncio mth it in some degree or other. 
 
 What you have made known to me on the substance of 
 the instructions transmitted to Lord Ponsonby, has suggested 
 a reflection to which perhaps it would not be inappropriate 
 to call Lord Palmerston's attention. To ask the Porte, in 
 a specific case, to call for the aid of our squadrons, is not 
 this in some degree affording it a facility of keeping them 
 at a distance from the Dardanelles, by eluding or delaying 
 this invitation through the means of some pretext more or less 
 specious ? Would it not be better to ask the Porte simply to 
 issue the necessary orders for their reception in the straits, 
 on their presenting themselves after the accomplishment of the 
 condition which permitted the^ to appear there ? I think 
 we should obtain a substantial advantage by thus reserving 
 to ourselves the initiative, and in this sense the draft of the 
 note I forward is drawn up. 
 
 The news from Alexandria comes down to the 19th of
 
 HISTOEIC DOCUMENTS. 497 
 
 June. The viceroy, informed of the progress of the Ottoman 
 army in the invasion of Syria, had forwarded orders to 
 Ibrahim Pacha to repulse and pursue it beyond the frontiers, 
 when my orderly officer, M. Callier, whose mission I apprised 
 you of, reached Alexandria. The viceroy, after listening 
 to the representations which M. Callier, in concert with M. 
 Cochelet, communicated to him on my part, consented, not 
 without repugnance easily conceived, to recall the authority 
 he had transmitted to Ibrahim, and to command him to 
 limit himself to the repulse of the invasion, and this result 
 being accomplished, to pause wherever he might then find 
 himself. M. Callier was instructed to carry this order 
 to Ibrahim Pacha. ... It would be difficult not to admit 
 that in the whole progress of this affair, the Turks seem 
 to take pleasure in leaving to their adversaries the advan- 
 tages of sincerity and moderation. 
 
 This remark assumes a character of much more incontes- 
 tible evidence, when we compare the reception given by 
 the viceroy to our counsels, with that which the warnings 
 of Admiral Roussin obtained at Constantinople. In vain 
 did that ambassador, without suffering himself to be dis- 
 couraged by the ill success of his friendly remonstrances, 
 demand explanations as to the sailing of the fleet ; in vain, 
 after receiving fresh instructions forwarded to him by me, 
 did he return to the charge, and seek to open the eyes of 
 the Sultan on the dangers into which he thus wantonly 
 precipitated himself. . . . The Porte has completely thrown 
 off the mask with which it covered itself only a few days 
 before; it now avows its hostile projects, and that the fleet 
 is destined to effect a disembarkation. 
 
 The refusal of Lord Ponsonby to support the representations 
 of his colleague is a lamentable circumstance. The mere 
 silence of the English ambassador, in such a conjuncture, has 
 acted as an encouragement to the rash designs of the Porte. 
 Unfortunately, that encouragement results even more di-
 
 498 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 rectly in a strange circumstance to which allusion is made 
 in the correspondence of Admiral Eoussin, namely, the 
 promise of the despatch of English forces to Bassora, with a 
 view of preventing the pretended aggressive projects of the 
 Egyptians. One of the smallest dangers resulting from such 
 a measure would be the pretext or rather the justification it 
 would prepare for the occupation of Constantinople by a 
 Russian army. I have spoken to Lord Granville on this 
 subject without reserve, while avoiding at the same time any 
 expression that might give my language the appearance of an 
 official complaint. On your part you will confine yourself to 
 placing under the eyes of Lord Palmerston the documents I 
 forward to you, and you will acquaint me with any explana- 
 tions he may feel disposed to give. 
 
 8. Baron de Bourqueney to Marshal Soult. 
 
 Lmuhn, July "dth, 1839. . 
 
 On reaching Lord Palmerston's residence yesterday, I 
 began by inquiring whether the courier bearing the instruc- 
 tions to Lord Ponsonby had commenced his journey. Lord 
 Palmerston informed me that the despatches were not yet 
 completely ready, and -could not be so for four and twenty 
 hours. " I rejoice to hear it," I replied, " for I come by order 
 of my government to suggest to your Lordship, in the form 
 of your proposal to the Sultan, a modification, the propriety 
 of which I have no doubt you will fully appreciate." I then 
 began to read your Excellency's despatch. I paused at the 
 third paragraph, intending to return subsequently to that 
 with which it concluded, but in the mean time confining 
 myself to the separate discussion and arrangement of the 
 questions respecting the instructions to our ambassadors. I 
 then placed in Lord Palmerston's hands the draft of the note 
 prepared for Admiral Eoussin. 
 
 Lord Palmerston, who listened with the most profound
 
 HISTOEIC DOCUMENTS. 499 
 
 attention to your Excellency's despatch, and who read de- 
 liberately, weighing each expression, the draft of the note for 
 the King's ambassador at Constantinople, renders full justice 
 to the political view under which that note has been drawn up. 
 He acknowledges, with your Excellency, that both cabinets 
 will obtain a real advantage by reserving to themselves the 
 initiative in the step of immediately requiring the Porte to 
 issue the necessary orders for the admission of our squadrons, 
 after the accomplishment of the conditions to which we 
 ourselves subordinate that admission. In its form, Lord 
 Palmerston thinks that the first part of the note, notwith- 
 standing all the precautions of language with which it is 
 invested, presents to the Sultan a picture too faithful, but at 
 the same time too sombre, of his actual position. He fears 
 that such a frank expression of the truth may incline him to 
 reject our proposal. He feels satisfied that these documents 
 will be communicated by the Porte to Eussia on the same day 
 when they reach Constantinople ; and he apprehends, over the 
 haughty and blind spirit of the Sultan, the abuse by Eussia 
 of a language which she might represent to him as humiliating 
 to his crown. The second part of the note, and all the con- 
 siderations on which it founds European concert, he considers 
 excellent. But Lord Palmerston does not even insist upon 
 the first objection ; he is satisfied to leave it to the enlightened 
 consideration of the King's government. He merely apprises 
 us that the note of Lord Ponsonby will, in this part of its 
 detail, present a slight difference to that of Admiral Eoussin. 
 I could not refrain from observing to Lord Palmerston that 
 there was no method of escaping from the necessity of fore- 
 seeing or of making foreseen a catastrophe, in the form of 
 drawing up a note, the object of which was to offer the means 
 of preventing it, and which only founded the occasion for the 
 measure adopted on the very 'preliminaries of that expected 
 catastrophe. I added that our action on the Porte since the 
 events in Syria had always consisted in alarming the Sultan,
 
 500 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 80 as to restrain him within the bounds of moderation ; in 
 telling him the truth, in fact, to render him wise. " You are 
 right," replied Lord Palmerston; "I admit the necessity 
 which controls us ; thus I do not reject the idea ; I adopt it 
 even to the letter. I only think we ought to be cautious in 
 its development." 
 
 I promised Lord Palmerston to communicate this observa- 
 tion to your Excellency. 
 
 I offered Lord Palmerston, for bearer of his despatch to 
 Lord Ponsonby, the courier your Excellency has appointed 
 to proceed overland to Admiral Eoussin. Lord Palmerston 
 thanked me, but he will naturally avail himself of the 
 messenger who should have left London yesterday, but whose 
 departure is now delayed for forty-eight hours to insert in 
 the instructions to Lord Ponsonby the modifications proposed 
 by the King's government. 
 
 The English courier, as will also yours, must go through 
 Vienna, and Lord Beau vale, with M. de Sainte-Aulaire, will 
 receive orders to exert their utmost efforts to induce the 
 Austrian cabinet to associate itself with our measure. 
 
 This first question being disposed of, I resumed and finished 
 the reading of your Excellency's despatch. I then handed to 
 Lord Palmerston the extracts from the last despatches of the 
 King's ambassador at Constantinople, and added : '* I am not 
 charged with any official complaint. Some strange facts have 
 taken place. I am ordered to place before your Lordship the 
 documents which verify them, and to wait the explanations 
 which yovi may consider due to the mutual confidence of our 
 two cabinets. 
 
 Lord Palmerston rang the bell, and ordered the four last 
 months of Lord Ponsonby's correspondence to be brought to 
 him, with the two last years of that of Colonel Campbell. 
 
 "Let us confine ourselves at first," he said to me, "to 
 what concerns Lord Ponsonby; we will then turn to the 
 affair of Bassora. I feel boimd to prove to you that my
 
 HISTOKIC DOCUMENTS. 501 
 
 instructions have never varied on this fundamental point ; 
 that the English ambassador at Constantinople was to con- 
 sider it his constant duty to restrain the warlike propensities 
 of the Sultan. On the basis of the question there is no 
 divergence between us ; that we may be a little more pre- 
 possessed with the quality of the sovereign than with that of 
 the vassal, that our bias may incline on the side of that 
 principle, is quite true. But the reason is, that in our esti- 
 mation the fact is on the side of the principle. The inde- 
 pendence and stability of the Sultan's throne seem to us to 
 requu'e that partiality, and we have always dreaded lest in 
 wounding the pride of the sovereign of Constantinople we 
 should furnish Eussia with a weapon against us. But I 
 affirm to you that we have incessantly repeated to Lord Pon- 
 sonby, ' Prevent war from breaking out.' " 
 
 Lord Palmerston then made me read seven or eight de- 
 spatches written by him to Lord Ponsonby, from the end of 
 January to the middle of June, and all founded on this general 
 datum. 
 
 " Now," Lord Palmerston resumed, " I cannot conceal 
 from you that the personal opinion of Lord Ponsonby, an 
 opinion in which I by no means participate, has always been 
 opposed to the maintenance of the statu quo of Kutaieh ; he 
 preferred even extreme measures as at least susceptible of a 
 favourable termination. But I am justified in beUeving, that 
 in his official relations at Constantinople the ambassador has 
 subordinated his personal opinions to his instructions." 
 (Lord Palmerston then read to me, at hazard, all the last 
 despatches of Lord Ponsonby, which verified his pacific endea- 
 vours with the Porte.) 
 
 I observed to Lord Palmerston that it seemed to me very 
 difficult to suppose that the personal opinions of the ambas- 
 sador — easily penetrated on the spot, and traTisparent, even 
 in the despatches I had just read — must not have detracted 
 in some measure from the efficacy of his pacific action at 
 VOL. IV. L L
 
 502 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 Constantinople. Lord Palmerston, without directly assenting 
 to my opinion, answered in such a manner as to convince me 
 that he entertained similar apprehensions. 
 
 In any other country, the result of this conversation would 
 have been the probable recall of Pord Ponsonby. Here mat- 
 ters are differently arranged. External affairs are entirely 
 regulated by internal influences. 
 
 With reference to the refusal of Lord Ponsonby to associate 
 himself with the step reported by Admiral Eoussin in his 
 despatch of the 14th of June, I demanded of Lord Palmer- 
 ston whether such a circumstance would be repeated after 
 the close union now manifesting itself between the two 
 cabinets on the affairs of the East. Lord Palmerston assured 
 me that Lord Ponsonby had already received, and would 
 speedily receive in addition, official and confidential instruc- 
 tions which would give an entirely new character to his lan- 
 guage and conduct. 
 
 *' I now come," said Lord Palmerston, " to the affair of 
 Bassora. IMore than two years have elapsed since we en- 
 gaged Mehemet Ali not to extend his occupation towards 
 the Persian Gulf. To our remonstrances at Alexandria he 
 has always replied by a denial of the facts. The reports of 
 our agents convinced us that the occupation had actually 
 taken place, and that Egyptian officers had entered Bassora, 
 Lalesa, and Katif, and were menacing the small island of 
 Baleraie, under the pretext of preventing it from becoming 
 a focus of insurrection against themselves. At Alexandria we 
 had threatened to employ force to prevent any Egyptian 
 establishment in the Persian Gulf ; but before adopting that 
 extreme measure we had thought it right to apply to the 
 sovereign cle jure to ascertain whether he had given consent 
 to this extension of Egyptian power. Undoubtedly we knew 
 that the reply would be in the negative ; but we thought by 
 this course to render our action regular. This is the step 
 alluded to in the despatches you have just read to me. After
 
 HISTOEIC DOCUMENTS. 503 
 
 that, I may add that we never contemplated anything beyond 
 sending out a ship of war without troops for disembarkation. 
 This demonstration alone appeared to us likely to be more 
 than sufficient. I must also inform you that this question, 
 exclusively special for us, with relation to the Persian Grulf, 
 has nothing in common -with the events of Syria, and will 
 have no influence whatever on our course in the general 
 negociation." 
 
 I asked Lord Palmerston whether he did not apprehend 
 that at Constantinople the recent proceeding of Lord Pon- 
 sonby might be translated into an encouragement of the 
 warlike propensities of the Sultan. He answered, that if so, 
 it was because they were determined to deceive themselves 
 as to its bearing, for it was well known, for a year at least, 
 that the matter was in dispute between the English govern- 
 ment and the Pacha of Egypt. 
 
 Lord Palmerston placed before me the entire correspon- 
 dence of Colonel Campbell since November 1837, and I am 
 bound to admit that it settles the question on the data he 
 had previously laid down. 
 
 It is not for me to decide whether the King's government 
 will be contented^ with those explanations ; but I can assure 
 your Excellency that there is here every desire to render 
 them satisfactory. 
 
 I pray you to receive, &c. 
 
 BOUEQUENET. 
 
 9. Baron de Bourqueney to Marshal Soult 
 
 Marshal, -^^^^^""' '^"^^ 1^^^*' ^^39. 
 
 . . . Lord Palmerston gives his most unreserved con- 
 sent to the plan of declaration by which the powers engage 
 themselves to maintain the integrity of the Ottoman empire, 
 without excepting any portion of its territory. Lord Palmer- 
 
 ll2
 
 501 HISTORIC DOCUxMENTS. 
 
 ston is ready to make this announcement in the name of the 
 British ministry ; and he proposes, moreover, to the King's 
 government, when all the declarations reach Vienna, to 
 combine them under the most solemn form of a general 
 engagement. ... 
 
 10. Baron de Bourqueney to Marshal Soult. 
 
 Monsieur le Marechal, 
 
 Lord Palmerston had just received his courier from Vienna 
 when I brought to him your Excellency's despatch (No. 27), 
 and the extracts from the correspondence of the Count de 
 Sainte-Aulaire. After reading them, he replied by commu- 
 nicating to me the despatches and confidential letters of Lord 
 Beauvale, without the omission of a single syllable. 
 
 Our ambassadors agree entirely on the dispositions of 
 Prince Metternich : they entertain the same hope of inducing 
 the Austrian cabinet to join in our political action at Con- 
 stantinople ; the same anticipation of the death of the Sultan ; 
 and the same approval of the plan of declaration by which 
 the European powers would solemnly pledge themselves to 
 maintain the integrity of the Ottoman empire, — the initiative 
 of which plan has been assumed by M. de Metternich in his 
 successive conferences with M. de Sainte-Aulaire and Lord 
 Beauvale. 
 
 As I had the honour of announcing yesterday in my des- 
 patch (No. 62), Lord Palmerston has ratified without reserve 
 the favourable opinion which your Excellency expressed on 
 the proposition of Prince Metternich respecting all the mea- 
 sures to be adopted. Starting always from this general 
 datum, that Russia is at the present moment incapable, 
 Lord Palmerston expects that we shall obtain her concurrence. 
 A refusal would completely change the order of facts. 
 
 Lord Palmerston asked me if the King's government.
 
 HISTORIC DOCURIENTS. 505 
 
 favourable as it had expressed itself to the idea of M. de 
 Metternichj had found time to determine on the form of the 
 declaration by which it would reply to the Austrian cabinet. 
 I told him that I had as yet received no information on that 
 point. He then requested me to consult our ministry on the 
 project of uniting at Vienna, in a general European act, all 
 the individual declarations of the powers as soon as they 
 should reach the seat of negotiation. Ever since his lordship 
 has admitted the advantage of fixing on Vienna for that pur- 
 pose, I owe him the justice to acknowledge that I cannot 
 perceive the slightest disposition on his part to reserve any 
 points for exclusive consideration in London, beyond the 
 share of control which every cabinet has naturally a right to 
 exercise in communication with its own ambassador. 
 
 Lord Palmerston is equally anxious to ascertain whether 
 our government coincides with the opinion he expressed to 
 me yesterday, and which I have already had the honour of 
 transmitting to your Excellency, on the necessity of making 
 the presumed death of the Sultan a plea for the admission of 
 our squadrons into the Sea of Marmara. This project will 
 lead to a certain increase of latitude and responsibility in the 
 instructions to be conveyed to our ambassadors at Constan- 
 tinople ; for in such an eventuality they must necessarily be 
 left to judge of circumstances which we cannot possibly fore- 
 stall at this distance from the scene of action. , 
 
 In his despatch of the 1st of July, Lord Beauvale strongly 
 recommends to Lord Palmerston the plan of adding to our 
 squadrons on the coast of Syria some Eussian men-of-war 
 from the Black Sea. The arguments are ably set forward : — 
 " We flatter Russia, and lead her into the European concert ; 
 we take from her all pretext for using her influence at Con- 
 stantinople to close the Dardanelles against our ships ; finally, 
 we extort from her a pledge, for such her detachment would 
 be in the midst of our two fleets." These arguments have 
 not, up to this date, shaken the opinion which Lord Palmer- 
 
 L l3
 
 506 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 ston had previously expressed to me on the closing of the Sea 
 of jNIarmara by the Bosphorus and the straits. The general 
 manner of contemplating the question remains the same, 
 with the single exception to which we have recourse at this 
 moment;, as our couriers are on the road to Constantinople 
 bearing a demand for the admission of our squadrons in a 
 given case ; and the expected death of the Sultan adds to the 
 probable contingencies which may render that admission 
 necessary. " But," Lord Palmerston observed, " the advan- 
 tage of the presence of Eussian ships on the coast of Syria 
 does not appear to me to be sufficiently demonstrated to call 
 for a deviation from principle." He then added this curious 
 fact: "When we returned to power in 1835, I waited on the 
 Duke of Wellington : my intimacy with him j ustified a coU' 
 fidential step. I mentioned to the Duke that the East being 
 called upon to act an important part in the affairs of Europe, 
 I was extremely anxious to ascertain his opinion on the two 
 plans which offered themselves to our policy, — either to open 
 the Sea of Marmara to our fleets, and consequently to those 
 of the other powers, or to close it to all, including our own.. 
 The Duke replied, without hesitation, — 'Close it; on those 
 shores we are too far from our resources, while Eussia has 
 hers at hand.' His words struck me," continued Lord 
 Palmerston, " as being full of sense and sound argument." 
 
 Lord Palmerston read to me the despatch he was about to 
 send to Lord Clanricarde, in answer to the last communication 
 from Count de Nesselrode. The English cabinet thanks the 
 cabinet of St. Petersbourg for the readiness with which it 
 offers to co-operate in restricting the theatre of the struggle 
 between the two belligerent parties ; but it insists on the 
 necessity of rendering impossible a repetition of events which 
 might compromise the peace of the world ; and it considers 
 a permanent arrangement between the Porte and Mehemet 
 Ali as the surest means of obtaining the end proposed by the 
 European powers. The despatch adverts several times to
 
 HISTOKIC DOCUMENTS. 507 
 
 the close union existing between the cabinets of London and 
 Paris, — a union which has dictated the instructions forwarded 
 to the admirals commanding our respective squadrons in the 
 Mediterranean. 
 
 Lord Beauvale had added to his despatch of the 2nd of 
 July to Lord Palmerston, a private letter from Lord Pon- 
 sonby, which reached him by the last post from Constan- 
 tinople. Lord Palmerston expressed a wish that I should read 
 it. My impression is that Lord Ponsonby does not always 
 confine himself to the views of his oivn cabinet The letter 
 is an appeal to his colleagues and to the cabinets they 
 represent. In it he speaks of the death of the Sultan as 
 of a realized fact; he exclaims against the policy of the 
 statu quo, which, according to him, has ruined the East 
 since 1832. He says there is not a moment to be lost in 
 repairing its errors. Our flags must wave before Constan- 
 tinople ; Austria must declare her determination to push an 
 army in advance, &c. Constantinople once in the power of 
 the Eussians, and there no longer remains one single first- 
 rate power in Europe, — England alone excepted, if she 
 stoops to enter into a disgraceful bargain with the cabinet 
 of St. Petersbourg. All this is a compound of good and bad 
 ideas, nearly always ingenious, but often inapplicable. I was 
 before inclined to think that Lord Ponsonby is not a very scru- 
 pulous organ of the policy of his cabinet ; now I am convinced 
 of it. I venture to request that your Excellency will maintain 
 secrecy on the communication which I owe entirely to the 
 confidence^ of Lord Palmerston. 
 
 I pray you to accept, &c. 
 
 BOURQUENET. 
 
 L L 4
 
 508 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 11. Marshal Soult to Baron de Bourqueney. 
 
 Monsieur le Baron, ^""'"'^ '^"^^ 1^^'*' ^^^^- 
 
 Under the very serious crisis into which the death of the 
 Sultan Mahmoud, happening in the midst of the events which 
 have marked the last months of his reign, has plunged the Otto- 
 man empire, the union of the great powers of Europe could 
 alone offer a satisfactory guarantee to the friends of peace. 
 The communications exchanged for several weeks have for- 
 tunately proved that this union is as complete as can 
 possibly be wished. All the cabinets desire the independence 
 and integrity of the Ottoman Porte under the dynasty 
 actually on the throne; all are disposed to employ their 
 means of action and influence to secure the continuance of 
 this essential element in the political equilibrium, and they 
 would not hesitate to declare themselves against any com- 
 bination whatever that might seek to assail it. Such a 
 perfect unanimity of sentiment and resolution being suffi- 
 cient, since no one can refuse to doubt it, not only to 
 prevent any attempt against this great interest, but, in 
 addition, to dissipate the anxieties, the urgency of which 
 constitute in themselves a substantial danger in consequence 
 of the general agitation they excite, — the King's government 
 is of opinion that the cabinets wovild take an important step 
 to the secure establishment of peace, by announcing in 
 written documents, reciprocally communicated, and which 
 would of necessity soon obtain publicity more or less com- 
 plete, a statement of the intentions I have named above. 
 As far as we are concerned, I declare formally that such 
 are and will continue to be ours, and I authorize you to 
 leave a copy of the present despatch with Lord Palmerston, 
 having previously given it to him to read. I feel satisfied 
 that the British government in the answer it will undoubtedly 
 consider due to the letter with which you will accompany
 
 HISTOKIC DOCUMENTS. 509 
 
 this despatch, will adhere, in the most formal manner, to 
 this profession of faith, so entirely conformable to the repeat- 
 edly expressed avowal of its policy. If, as I have reason 
 to hope, the cabinets of Vienna, Berlin, and St. Petersbourg, 
 reply in the same tone to similar communications I am 
 about to forward to them, the end which the King's govern- 
 ment purposes to itself will be accomplished. 
 
 His Majesty, desirous of affording an unequivocal testi- 
 mony of the friendly dispositions with which he is animated 
 towards the Porte, has instructed me to forward to Admiral 
 Eoussin, without waiting the official intelligence or even 
 a direct confirmation of the death of the Sultan Mahmoud, 
 his credentials as ambassador to the new Emperor. 
 
 12. Marshal Soult to Baron de Bourqueiuy. 
 
 Paris, July 17th, 1839. 
 Monsieur le Baron, 
 
 I have made known to you by telegraph the death of 
 the Sultan Mahmoud, the news of which we received through 
 the same channel, and which the last despatches from Con- 
 stantinople announced as being then imminent. It is to 
 be apprehended that the order transmitted to Hafiz Pacha 
 for the suspension of hostilities may have reached him too 
 late to prevent the expected battle. Although it is at 
 present extremely difficult to anticipate the nature of the 
 influence which this change of reign may exercise upon the 
 destinies of the East, it is evident that they have reached 
 a crisis which calls for the most serious and loyal concurrence 
 of all the cabinets to secure the continuance of peace. It 
 seems to me that the moment has arrived to act upon the 
 idea already suggested by M. de Metternich, of guaranteeing, 
 by means of an interchange of diplomatic declarations, the 
 maintenance of the integrity and independence of the Ottoman
 
 510 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 empire ; and to* prevent any delay, I have resolved to 
 assume the initiative myself in the necessary steps to be 
 taken for that object. The accompanying despatch formally 
 expresses on our part the engagement of which I now speak. 
 Lord Palmerston will, I have no doubt, reply to the com- 
 munication you will make to him, in terms sufficiently precise 
 to attain the end we have in view. 
 
 13. Baron de Bourqueney to Lord Palmerston. 
 
 London^ July \Qth, 1839. 
 My Lord, 
 
 I obey the orders of my government in transmitting to 
 your Excellency, without delay, a copy of the despatch I 
 have this moment received from the Marshal Duke of 
 Dalmatia, bearing date July the 17th. 
 
 The King's government, my Lord, feels assured before- 
 hand that it will find in the cabinet of her Britannic Majesty 
 principles and sentiments conformable to those which direct 
 and will invariably continue to direct its policy in the 
 affairs of -the East; but it attaches an important value to 
 the acknowledgment of a new testimony of that happy 
 unanimity. 
 
 I pray your Excellency to acknowledge the receipt of 
 
 this letter, &c. 
 
 Bourqueney. 
 
 14. Lord Palmerston to the Baron de Bourqueney. 
 
 Foreign Office, July 22nd, 1839. 
 Monsieur le Baron, 
 
 I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of your note 
 
 of the 19th inst., enclosing, by order of your government, a 
 
 copy of a despatch, dated the 17th inst., which you have
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 511 
 
 received from the Duke of Dalmatia, relative to the present 
 posture of affairs in Turkey. 
 
 I have to express to you, in reply, the great satisfaction 
 Avith which her Majesty's government has received this 
 communication, and lose no time in authorising you to assure 
 your own government that the British cabinet, like that of 
 France, desires to uphold the integrity and independence of 
 the Ottoman empire under its existing dynasty ; and is 
 ready to use its influence and its means of action for the 
 purpose of maintaining this essential element of the balance 
 of power in Europe; and like that of France, would not 
 hesitate to declare itself openly against any combination 
 which might be conceived in a spirit of hostility to the prin- 
 ciples above mentioned. 
 
 I have the honour to be, with high consideration. 
 
 Monsieur le Baron, 
 Your most obedient humble Servant, 
 
 Palmekston. 
 
 15. Baron de Bourqueney to Marshal Soult. 
 
 Monsieur le Marechal, ^'''^'''' '^"^^ 2^'^^^' ^^^^' 
 
 I have communicated to Lord Palmerston the two tele- 
 graphic despatches of yesterday's date, which your Excel- 
 lency has done me the honour to forward. They have 
 naturally produced a most painful impression upon his mind, 
 and he was unable to restrain an ebullition of displeasure at 
 the blindness which has exposed Mahmoud and his empire to 
 such a disastrous event. 
 
 Upon considering, however, more calmly, the general 
 position, and assuming that Ibrahim Pacha may not have 
 followed up his successes to an extremity dangerous to the 
 actual safety of the Ottoman empire. Lord Palmerston has 
 gradually come to a conclusion analogous to that of his first
 
 512 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 reasoning, when I informed him of the death of the Sultan. 
 The second event, like the first, finds, as he thinks, the great 
 powers nearly determined as to the means of preventing 
 all European complication ; the interchange between our 
 two cabinets of declarations relative to the maintenance of 
 the integrity and independence of the Ottoman empire, is 
 even an additional step in this sound direction; by perse- 
 vering in the same course. Lord Palmerston hopes that every 
 impending catastrophe may be prevented. 
 ^ At the same time his mind is strongly impressed by the 
 deplorable prostration of the Ottoman power, at the moment 
 when it passes into the hands of a sovereign of sixteen years 
 of age ; and this prostration must of necessity form a serious 
 cause of regret and alarm to the powers who are the disin- 
 terested protectors of the Porte. Lord Palmerston associates 
 this reflection with a natural tendency to suspect that Russia, 
 without absolutely desiring a European complication, but 
 looking upon the weakness of the Ottoman power as favour- 
 able to her views for the future, may have secretly urged on 
 Egypt and the Porte to this last collision. This suspicion he 
 holds as confirmed by the recent efforts of the Russian 
 cabinet to resti-ict the theatre of contest within certain limits, 
 and to prescribe to the presumed victor, Ibrahim Pacha, the 
 route of Diarbekir, — a direction which would not compel the 
 Porte to demand the fulfilment of the treaty of Unkiar- 
 Skelessi, and for which Russia feels herself at this moment 
 unprepared. 
 
 Passing from these general considerations to the practical 
 side of the question, I asked Lord Palmerston whether he 
 considered that the news of the defeat of the Turkish army 
 required any modification in the measures already adopted 
 by our two cabinets under an anticipation of the event now 
 realized. Lord Palmerston replied that as yet he saw no 
 such necessity. 
 
 " The instructions to our admirals," he said, " enable them
 
 HISTOEIC DOCUMENTS. 513 
 
 to deal with the event of the 24th of June. Ibrahim Pacha 
 will probably have paused of his own accord in his first 
 successes. Should he prosecute them, the commanders of 
 our squadrons have their course traced out ; if, on the other 
 hand, terror should again have thrown the Porte into the 
 arms of Eussia, our first instructions to the ambassadors 
 peremptorily indicate to them the demand they will then 
 address to the Porte for the admission of our fleets into the 
 Sea of Marmara. We must redouble our efforts and activity 
 at Vienna to push on the conclusion of a permanent settle- 
 ment, the general bases of which have already been pre- 
 arranged by the other powers as the limits within which the 
 negociation is to proceed. Egypt will, of course, become 
 more exacting ; but European concert will be able to triumph 
 over all these obstacles. 
 
 Your Excellency has now a summary of the principal 
 points of Lord Palmerston's conversation. ... I may 
 add, in confidence, that in case the King's government 
 should feel the necessity of modification in the course pur- 
 sued up to this moment, any overtures on that subject will 
 be received here with sincere deference. 
 
 Lord Palmerston requests me to thank your Excellency in 
 his name for the promptness and accuracy of your com- 
 munications. 
 
 Pray accept, &c. 
 
 BOUEQUENEY. 
 
 16. Marshal Soidt to Baron de Bourqueney. 
 
 Paris, July ^Qth, 1839. 
 
 • ••••• 
 
 The answer given by Lord Palmerston to the declaration, 
 a copy of which I instructed you to remit to him, is satis- 
 factory on all points.
 
 514 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 The important news which have reached us within the last 
 few days from the East, have given an entirely new aspect to 
 the state of affairs. Whatever may have been our anxiety as 
 to the future, arising from the magnitude of the danger to 
 which the late policy of the Sultan Mahmoud exposed the 
 Ottoman empire, the event has exceeded all conjectures. 
 The death of the Sultan, the utter defeat of the Turkish 
 army in Syria, the defection of the fleet, have placed that 
 empire in such a position, that henceforward the protection 
 of Europe and the j^rudence of Mehemet Ali are the only 
 securities remaining to the throne of the young Abdul 
 Medjid. 
 
 . . . The Porte, a few days after the death of the 
 Sultan Mahmoud, while still unacquainted with the defection 
 of the fleet, but doubtlessly aware of the defeat of Hafiz 
 Pacha, announced officially to the representatives of the 
 great powers, its intention to seek a reconciliation with the 
 viceroy, and to make concessions to him with this object. 
 JMehemet, inflated by the feeling of superiority derived from 
 recent circumstances, evinced a disposition to exorbitant 
 demands. 
 
 The rapidity with which events hasten onwards, excite ap- 
 prehensions that the crisis may wind up by some arrange- 
 ment in which the European powers will not have time to 
 interfere, and that, consequently, the interests essential to the 
 general policy may not be sufficiently considered. This danger 
 is an inevitable consequence of our distance from Constanti- 
 nople, and there are no means of providing an absolute re- 
 medy. I think, however, that it will be desirable to continue 
 the course adopted up to this time, and which consists in sub- 
 ordinating as much as possible to an intimate and sustained 
 concert between the cabinets, the action which some amongst 
 them are prepared to exercise in the Eastern question. As 
 regards England and France, including also Austria, although 
 she does not as openly proclaim her views, the principle and
 
 HISTOEIC DOCUMENTS. 515 
 
 veritable object of this concert is to restrain Eussia, and to 
 accustom her to treat in common on oriental affairs. It is 
 enough to say, that under existing conjunctures, there is 
 more reason than ever for our strict unanimity, and the same 
 sentiment prevails at Vienna. M. de Mettermich even evinces 
 a strong prepossession on this point. 
 
 This being agreed, I consider that the powers, while giving 
 full approbation to the conciliatory sentiments of the Porte, 
 should insist upon nothing being precipitated, and should in- 
 terdict all treaty with the viceroy, except through the inter- 
 vention and concurrence of its allies, whose co-operation 
 would undoubtedly supply the best means of securing better 
 and more securely guaranteed conditions. 
 
 I think that the same powers should at Alexandria assume 
 a tone and language with the viceroy calculated to make 
 him feel that, whatever advantages he may have obtained, he 
 would encounter the risk of compromising by seeking to 
 push them too far, and that if he attempted, under any form 
 or pretext whatever, to extort from the Sultan conditions 
 incompatible with the dignity and security of his throne, 
 combined Europe would interfere in opposition. To render 
 such language effectual, the consuls should be empowered to 
 adopt it simultaneously, and in such terms as to prove their 
 entire accordance. It is also essential that the firmness, I 
 had almost said the severity of the advice conveyed, should 
 be tempered by a tone of moderation and good feeling which, 
 while checking the audacity of JMehemet Ali, would ab- 
 stain from wounding too deeply his pride and ambition. 
 There would assuredly be affectation in seeming to believe, 
 that after the successes he has obtained through the senseless 
 acfsression of the Porte, he would not feel himself in a con- 
 dition to expect more than he had a right previously to 
 demand. This would be to deny the empire of facts, and 
 the necessities of the situation. If the viceroy were to con- 
 vince himself that he had nothing to expect from the equity
 
 516 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 of the powers, he would revolt against their imperious re- 
 presentations, and his irritation might, from one moment to 
 another, bring on consequences, the very possibility of which 
 is sufficient to alarm all provident minds. 
 
 Such are the first impressions the King's government has 
 received from the latest oriental news. You will make them 
 known to Lord Palmerston, and ascertain whether they coin- 
 cide with the views of the British cabinet. 
 
 You will remark in Admiral Roussin's despatch, in which 
 he details the propositions submitted by the Porte to Me- 
 hemet Ali, that which concedes to the Pacha the investiture 
 for life of the sovereignty of Egypt. Our ambassador has 
 mistaken the intention of Nourri Eflfendi. The question is 
 of hereditary investiture, as evidently results from two docu- 
 ments appended to the report of the Austrian charge d'af- 
 faires on the conference in which these reports were com- 
 municated to the representatives of the powers, and also 
 from the letter Avith which the Grand Vizier transmitted them 
 to the viceroy. 
 
 17. Baron de Bourqueney to Marshal Soult. 
 
 Monsieur le Marechal, Lmdon, July Tith, 1839. 
 
 I received this morning the telegraphic despatch, in 
 which your Excellency announces to me the defection of the 
 Capitan Pacha. I wrote immediately to Lord Palmerston to 
 acquaint him with this important intelligence. He replied 
 by requesting me to call on him at two o'clock at the 
 Foreign Office ; a cabinet council was being held there, and 
 I believe he was anxious to consult his colleagues during that 
 sitting. 
 
 Lord Palmerston left the Council to read the telegraphic
 
 ' HISTOllIC DOCUMENTS. 517 
 
 desj^atch, and returned to communicate it to the other 
 members of the cabinet. The result of their deliberation 
 was, that until they ascertained the particulars of this 
 new event, nothing should be modified in the preceding 
 instructions. 
 
 A courier from Vienna, who left that city on the 17th 
 instant, arrived this morning in London. He brings news 
 from Constantinople to the 8th. The treason of the Capitan- 
 Pacha was already known at that date. Prince Esterhazy 
 handed to me the despatch of M. de Metternich to read, and 
 the extracts from the correspondence of Baron Sturmer. 
 The description given by the charge d'affaires is extremely 
 sombre. Prince Metternich writes to Prince Esterhazy that 
 time must not be luasted in lamentation, and that the 
 moment has arrived for cementing more closely than ever 
 the union of the governments in the projected negotiation at 
 Vienna. 
 
 Lord Palmerston spoke with me this morning in the same 
 sense ; he thinks we should press as urgently as possible the 
 conclusion of the arrangement, under the protection of the 
 five courts. He says that Lord Beauvale is amply provided 
 with instructions and powers to that effect. These instruc- 
 tions, as your -Excellency is aware, include the hereditary 
 sovereignty in the family of Mehemet Ali, and a territorial 
 compensation for the Ottoman Porte. I hear that, in the 
 opinion of the English cabinet, this compensation amounts to 
 the complete restoration of Syria I but I do not think it will 
 be insisted on as a sine qua non. 
 
 Lord Palmerston is strongly apprehensive that the Eussian 
 cabinet will urge at Constantinople a direct arrangement be- 
 tween the Sultan and Mehemet Ali, which would break down, 
 by rendering them useless, the negotiations of Vienna, with 
 the accruing guarantees ; but he thinks that even admitting the 
 case of direct settlement, we should continue our efforts to 
 
 VOL. IV. M M
 
 518 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 produce from the moral concurrence of the four courts an act 
 to which the fifth would be compelled to subscribe. 
 
 • ••••• 
 
 Deign to accept, &c. 
 
 BOURQUENEY. 
 
 18. Baron de Bourqueney to Marshal Soult. 
 Monsieur le Marechal, London, July Zlst, 1839, 
 
 • «•«•* 
 
 Yesterday, when I was preparing to send off the portfolio 
 of the embassy, Lord Palmerston wrote to request I would 
 call upon him. He had just received his courier from Paris, 
 and he was anxious to show me the correspondence of Lord 
 G-ranville, being struck by some discrepancies of detail 
 between his despatch and that which I communicated to him 
 the day before. 
 
 Lord Granville writes, on the evening of the 26th, that 
 your Excellency had declared to him that, in the opinion of 
 the King's government, — 
 
 " Neither the disastrous defeat of the Turkish army, nor the 
 treason of the Capitan-Pacha, nor the dejected attitude of 
 the Divan, ought to modify the course which the great powers 
 of Europe propose to follow. That any arrangement entered 
 into between the Sultan and Mehemet Ali, at the moment 
 when the ministers of the empire were either paralyzed by 
 fear or traitorously occupied in satisfying their own personal 
 ambition, in contempt of the rights of their sovereign, ought 
 to he considered as null and void, and that a declaration to 
 this effect should be conveyed to Mehemet Ali. Finally, your 
 Excellency is stated to have added that i/ou would ^vnte 
 on the same day to Vienna to the French ambassador, to 
 transmit to him this opinion of the King's government.
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 519 
 
 instructing him also to obtain the adhesion of the Austrian 
 cabinet.^'' 
 
 I quote Lord Grranville's despatch according to the text. 
 
 Lord Palmerston replies to Lord Granville that the English 
 ministry adheres to every syllable of your Excellency's declara- 
 tion ; that, without previous concert, the two cabinets adopt 
 an identical conclusion, and that nothing can more decidedly 
 prove the community of the object they propose, and the 
 mutual responsibility by which they are animated. 
 
 But Lord Palmerston also remarked, with some anxiety, 
 certain divergencies between the declaration of your Excel- 
 lency, as reported by Lord Granville, and the following 
 phrases in the despatch you did me the honour to address 
 to me : — 
 
 " We must make the enemy feel that, whatever may be the 
 advantages he has obtained, he would encounter the risk of 
 compromising, by seeking to push them too far." . . . 
 
 " There would be affectation in seeming to believe that after 
 the advantages Mehemet Ali has obtained, through the sense- 
 less aggressions of the Porte, he would not feel himself in a 
 condition to expect more than he had a right previously to 
 demand. This would be to deny the empire of facts, and the 
 necessities of the situation." .... 
 
 I endeavoured to weaken, as much as I possibly could, the 
 contrast which Lord Palmerston pointed out to me. I even, 
 reduced it to a mere obscurity in the formula ; I called his 
 attention to the idea which predominated, as well in the 
 declaration of your Excellency to Lord Granville as in the 
 despatch you did me the honour to forward, — an idea com- 
 prised in preventing a direct settlement between the Sultan 
 and the Pacha, in which the interests of the Ottoman 
 empire would be sacrificed to a combination of disastrous 
 circumstances, and the interests of Europe deprived of the 
 guarantee they looked for in a treaty concluded under the 
 influence of the great powers. But not being furnished 
 
 M M 2
 
 520 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 with positive information as to the basis which the King's 
 government desires to give to this arrangement, I avoided 
 entering on that ground of discussion. Lord Pahnerston, how- 
 ever, did not allow the opportunity to escape of notifying to 
 me more clearly the views of the English cabinet. He said : — 
 
 " The more I reflect on this Eastern question (and I assure 
 you that I do not suffer any exclusively Englisli prepossession 
 to enter my mind on the subject), the more I arrive at this 
 conclusion, that France and England must, of necessity, 
 desire identically the same thing, — the security and strength 
 of the Ottoman empire ; or, if these expressions are too 
 ambitious, its return to a state which presents the fewest 
 possible chances of foreign intervention. "Well, we shall only 
 attain this object by placing the desert between the Sultan 
 and his vassal. Let Mehemet Ali remain master of his 
 Egypt, — let him obtain the hereditary sovereignty which has 
 been the constant aim of his desires ; but let there be no 
 longer any possible collision, and, consequently, no neigh- 
 bourhood between these two rival powers. Eussia covets 
 (prospectively) the European provinces, and, at the bottom 
 of her heart, sees with joy the Asiatic limbs separate them- 
 selves from the Ottoman body. Can we promote this interest ? 
 Evidently not. They speak of the material difficulties we 
 shall encounter in obtaining our object. I believe that 
 Mehemet Ali will not resist a sincere desire expressed in 
 common by the great powers. Should he do so, his claims 
 will not be increased by this contempt for the advice of 
 Europe, while endeavouring to save appearances; and, if 
 force should become necessary, the result would neither be 
 long nor doubtful. 
 
 " Such," continued Lord Palmerston, " is the well-consi- 
 dered opinion of the English cabinet. If we thought that 
 Mehemet Ali could seat himself, strong and respected upon 
 the Ottoman throne, and possess the empire in its indepen- 
 dence and integrity, we should say — let it be so. But,
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 521 
 
 convinced as we are, that if any strong feeling yet survives in 
 Turkey, it is a religious attachment to the Imperial family, 
 and that the whole empire will never consent to look upon 
 Mehemet AH as a descendant of the prophet, Gfod forbid 
 that we should embark in such a line of policy ! We 
 should find a second South America in the East, surrounded 
 by neighbours who would not always leave her to be con- 
 sumed by internal dissensions." 
 
 I have repeated Lord Palmerston's opinion in the exact 
 style of the conversation in which he developed it. I need 
 not add that it in no way replied to even a presumed idea 
 of the King's government ; but the last publications of the 
 press in both countries have recently given circulation to 
 certain notions which Lord Palmerston took the opportunity 
 of refutino-. 
 
 I promised Lord Palmerston, on leaving him, that I would 
 call your attention to the slight shade of difference he pointed 
 out to me between Lord Grranville's correspondence and your 
 Excellency's last despatch. 
 
 In compliance with Lord Palmerston's remonstrances, the 
 Prussian envoy had requested his cabinet to explain itself 
 on the basis of the projected arrangement between the Sultan 
 and Mehemet Ali. M. de Werther has just read to me the 
 confidential answer he has received from his father. The 
 Baron de Werther states in this letter that the Prussian 
 cabinet, not wishing to take any initiative in the Eastern 
 question, it is not the opinion of his government, but merely 
 his own, that he transmits to London ; and this opinion is, 
 that the bases of the arrangement ought to be the hereditary 
 sovereignty of Egypt in the family of Mehemet Ali, and the 
 complete restoration of Syria to the Sultan. M. de Werther 
 has communicated his father's letter to Lord Palmerston. 
 
 • ••••• 
 
 I beg you to receive, &c. 
 
 BOUEQUENET. 
 M M 3
 
 522 IIISTOKIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 19. Marshal Soult to Baron de Bourqueney. 
 
 Sir, Paris, Augtist 1st, 1839. 
 
 I send you a copy of a telegraphic despatch which I have 
 just received from the Consul-General of France at Alexan- 
 (hia. We learn from this that the Turkish fleet, on the 14th 
 of July, placed itself at the disposition of Mehemet Ali, 
 who has formally announced his intention of not restoring 
 it to the Porte until the removal of the Grand Vizier, and his 
 OAvn hereditary investiture of the country he governs. In 
 communicating this information to Lord Palmerston you will 
 have the goodness to ascertain the opinion of the cabinet of 
 London on the new attitude which France and England may 
 find themselves called upon to assume in consequence of this 
 serious complication. 
 
 M. de Metternich has forwarded an answer in conformity 
 with our declaration in favour of the independence and in- 
 tegrity of the Ottoman empire. According to what M. de 
 Sainte-Aulaire writes, the Chancellor of Austria, who recently 
 appeared to be quite satisfied with the intentions manifested 
 by Kussia, is now extremely uneasy on that point. It ap- 
 pears that the cabinet of St. Petersbourg, far from continu- 
 ing the assurances, otherwise sufiiciently vague, which it had 
 at first proffered of its desire to act in concert with the other 
 powers, now recedes under frivolous pretexts from all that 
 might substantiate or reduce them to formal acts. I am 
 surprised at the astonishment that M. de Metternich evinces 
 at this proceeding. I never imagined that, in the actual 
 question, Eussia would be brought to associate herself 
 frankly with the other cabinets whose policy is so opposed to 
 hers. I thought that, while appearing to labour with that 
 view, while using the most conciliatory forms, we only pro- 
 posed to restrain and intimidate her to a certain point, by
 
 HISTOKIC DOCUMENTS. 523 
 
 a demonstration of the perfect concert of the other great 
 powers, united in one common interest. With that object 
 it would be necessary for the powers, particularly France and 
 England, to hold a language towards the cabinet of St. Peters- 
 bourg absolutely uniform, and to address it only by combined 
 measures. I have, therefore, felt some regret at the step 
 
 lately taken by Lord Clanricarde with M. de Nesselrode. 
 
 » 
 • ••••• 
 
 The Eussian government has naturally concluded from 
 thence that on one point at least, the limits to be imposed, on 
 Mehemet AH, England expected to find more sympathy from 
 that quarter than from the other cabinets ; and will therefore 
 conclude, very erroneously without doubt, that an alliance 
 in which such discrepancies are manifested can neither be 
 very homogeneous nor imposing. 
 
 It is not, as I believe, only at St. Petersbourg essential to 
 neglect nothing to impress a conviction of the intimate 
 understanding between the courts of London and Paris. At 
 Vienna, also, notwithstanding the powerful interest which would 
 seem, at least for the moment, to impose silence on the nar- 
 row prejudices of a superannuated policy, — at Vienna they are 
 too much given to receive with a sort of satisfaction all that 
 tends to encourage a belief that this union exists not, or has 
 only existed imperfectly. M. de Metternich incessantly affects, 
 I am not quite sure with what object, to impress on our am- 
 bassador, that in Paris and London we are not agreed, and 
 that on that point he knows more than he chooses to disclose. 
 He collects with minute anxiety the most trifling circum- 
 stances that can lend support to this assertion. Thus, on 
 the most recent occasion, he remarked that Lord Beauvale was 
 not instructed, as M. de Sainte-Aulaire had been, to engage 
 the court of Vienna to demand with us the free admission 
 of the allied squadrons into the Sea of JNIarmara. And thus 
 also he pointed out with exaggeration the difference in the 
 instructions forwarded to the two admirals. 
 
 MM 4
 
 524 HISTORIC documents. 
 
 You are requested to direct the attention of Lord 
 Palmerston to the considerations I have here indicated. In 
 the frankness of our lanj^uage he will unquestionably dis- 
 cover a striking testimony of the desire we entertain to 
 preserve in our relations with the English cabinet the 
 character of intimacy so imperatively required by all the 
 leading interests of Europe. 
 
 20. Baron de Bourqueney to Marshal Soult. 
 
 London, August 1839, 
 Monsieur le INTarechal, 9 o'docJi in the Evming. 
 
 . . • • • 
 
 I wrote immediately to Lord Palmerston, to inform him 
 that your Excellency had instructed me to announce the 
 arrival of the Ottoman fleet at Alexandria, and to consult 
 the Eno-lish cabinet on the new attitude which France and 
 England might find themselves called on to assume, in conse- 
 quence of this serious complication. 
 
 Lord Palmerston appointed me to meet him at four 
 o'clock, at the Foreign Office. A cabinet covmcil was to 
 assemble at two, — the important intelligence I had trans- 
 mitted to be the subject of debate. 
 
 Lord Palmerston left the Council, accompanied by Lord 
 Minto ; he informed me, on entering his closet, that the 
 First Lord of the Admiralty would be present at our 
 conference. 
 
 "The Council," Lord Palmerston said, "has deliberated 
 on the news which the French government charged you to 
 communicate to me. Its first care was to re-peruse the 
 instructions addressed to Admiral Stopford. Nothing could be 
 found there to serve as guide to the commander of our
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 525 
 
 squadron, under the existing circumstances ; and it has been 
 decided to furnish him with more special directions. 
 
 " The Council thinks that the consummated defection of 
 the Capitan-Pacha cannot modify the political view which has 
 governed our mutual proceedings for six weeks. It furnishes, 
 on the contrary, an additional motive for perseverance and 
 progress in the same course. 
 
 " The principle being admitted, the Council is of opinion 
 that we ought to adopt coercive measures to obtain the 
 restitution of the Ottoman fleet. These measures must form 
 the subject of the fresh instructions to Admiral Stopford, 
 which Lord Minto and I will now draw up in your presence." 
 
 I replied to Lord Palmerston that the King's government 
 would duly appreciate this mark of confidence ; but I added 
 that I was myself without instructions ; that I was merely 
 authorized to coiisu/i, and not to deliberate; that, consequently, 
 anything I might say would in no manner commit the King's 
 government. Lord Palmerston said that this was perfectly 
 understood, and took up his pen. 
 
 Your Excellency will find, appended to my despatch, a 
 draft of the instructions drawn up by Lord Palmerston and 
 Lord JMinto, while the Council was sitting. 
 
 The object is the restitution of the Ottoman fleet to the 
 Sultan ; the means of coercion to be regulated by the degree 
 of resistance which the summons of the admirals will 
 encounter, on the part of Mehemet Ali, — from the appearance 
 of the allied squadrons before Alexandria, to the taking 
 possession of the Egyptian fleet and the blockade of the 
 port, — the rights of neutrals being duly respected. Lord 
 Palmerston and Lord Minto argue on the ground that the 
 Egyptian fleet would be at sea, because, as it cannot re-enter 
 Alexandria without being lightened, that operation would 
 amount to a dismantling ; and Mehemet cannot dispense 
 with his fleet at this moment, even for the necessities of his 
 army in Syria. Much latitude is left to the two admirals, as
 
 526 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 to the selection of points on which to direct themselves, 
 under specific circumstances. 
 
 Finally, a supplementary instruction provides for the 
 emergency under which the course of events might call upon 
 our ambassadors to require, in conformity with the orders of 
 their respective courts, tbe presence of our fleets in the 
 Bosphorus, at the moment when the admirals receive their 
 fresh orders. In this hypothesis, the admirals would have 
 to answer the appeal at once, and they would reserve, for a 
 future epoch, the execution of the present instructions. 
 
 Such is the summary of the document I append to my 
 despatch. 
 
 Feeling strongly the advantage of not losing a moment, 
 under these pressing circumstances, and still more convinced 
 of tbe necessity of acting in perfect concert with us, Lord 
 Palmerston and Lord Minto have urgently requested me to 
 transmit the copy of instructions to your Excellency this 
 evening. A courier from the English Admiralty will leave 
 London to-morrow, for Paris, and "will place himself on 
 Monday at the disposition of Lord Granville. If tbe King's 
 government approves the plan, and feels disposed to address 
 analogous instructions to Admiral Lalande, your Excellency 
 will, perhaps, be so kind as to announce this to Lord 
 Granville, and the English courier will then continue his 
 route to Marseilles. Should tbe conclusion be contrary, 
 your Excellency will equally have the goodness to acquaint 
 Lord Granville, and the courier then will wait in Paris for 
 fresh instructions from London. The objections of the 
 King's government, should any arise, will be weighed here 
 with a sincere desire of arriving at a perfect understanding 
 between the two cabinets. 
 
 • ••••• 
 
 I thought it essential not to allow this conference to ter- 
 minate without calling the most serious attention of Lord 
 Palmerston to the considerations developed in your Excel-
 
 HISTOKIC DOCUMENTS. 627 
 
 lency's last despatch. The presence of Lord Minto appeared 
 to me an additional reason for pointing out to the English 
 government the mistaken interpretations adopted in Europe 
 on the differences manifested between our foreign agents; 
 and the conclusions drawn from thence against the solidity 
 of the alliance between the two courts. I insisted with some 
 pertinacity on the necessit}'- of arranging their proceedings 
 beforehand, particularly at St. Petersbourg ; I quoted the in- 
 stance of Lord Clanricarde as being of a nature to create false 
 impressions by giving credit to the idea that the English 
 government was looking for a point d'appui with the Rus- 
 sian cabinet on the question of the limits of the Egyptian 
 restitution, — a question entirely se.condary to the leading 
 object we all propose, — the establishment of the principle that 
 the affairs of the East can only be arranged by mutual con- 
 cert between all the great powers of Europe. 
 
 Lord Palmerston and Lord Minto received these observa- 
 tions in good part. Lord Palmerston assured me that Lord 
 Clanricarde had exceeded his instructions if he had given his 
 step any character contrary to an expression of the most per- 
 fect unity between the two cabinets. 
 
 I was not anxious to extend further the circle of recrimi- 
 nation ; but the sincerity of our desire to maintain a perfect 
 imderstanding with the English cabinet, gives us on all 
 occasions a right to be frank with its organs ; this frankness 
 is in itself an additional pledge of our loyalty, and I can 
 assure you that this is the impression conveyed to the minds 
 of Lord Palmerston and Lord IMinto by the reading of your 
 Excellency's last despatch. 
 
 I pray you to accept, &c. 
 
 BOURQUENEY.
 
 528 IIISTOllIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 21. Marshal Soult to Baron de Bourqueney. 
 
 Sir, Paris, Avgtist 6th, 1839. 
 
 I received yesterday the letter you have done me the 
 honour to address to me, with a copy of the instructions to 
 the admirals handed to you by Lord Palmerston to be sub- 
 mitted to the approbation of the King's government. The 
 Council which has now debated on it, does not consider it pos- 
 sible to adhere in all points to the proposed plan. I appre- 
 hend that the English cabinet, under a first impression of the 
 untoward news from Alexandria, may not have sufficiently 
 considered the position in all its points. Hostilities are evi- 
 dently terminated in the East. Neither by land nor by sea 
 have we any announcement of an intention to continue, or 
 rather to resume them. On the one side, they have not the 
 means, even under the supposition, which is doubtful, that 
 they have the desire. On the other, they have no interest to 
 gain, and they are well aware that they could not continue 
 the war without exposing themselves to very serious conse- 
 quences, and without gratuitously compromising a most ad- 
 vantageous position. In this state of things, the defection of 
 the Ottoman fleet is an unfortunate and much to be regretted 
 event, for which we must endeavour to provide a remedy, 
 but it scarcely constitutes one of those cases of imminent 
 danger which justifies such extreme measures as are now 
 proposed to us. This fleet, in the hands of Mehemet Ali, is 
 now nothing more than a deposit, a pledge by aid of which 
 he proposes to obtain the hereditary investiture of all that he 
 at present possesses. France and England, while strongly 
 insisting on the demand already made to Mehemet Ali, 
 through our consuls, to restore the Turkish ships, ought im- 
 doubtedly to take such measures, in the improbable event of 
 his rene"sving the war, as may prevent him from using them
 
 HISTOKIC DOCUMENTS. 529 
 
 against the Porte ; and perhaps the best method of depriving 
 him of any such desire, would be to announce to him formally 
 that henceforward the French and English squadrons will act 
 in perfect unanimity to protect the Sultan against all aggres- 
 sions or invasions of whatever description they may be. Any 
 step or demonstration made in the sense I now indicate, 
 would meet with our fullest approbation, because we see in 
 it a real utility and great chances of an effectual result. But, 
 I repeat it, an act of hostility against Mehemet Ali would not 
 facilitate the plan proposed by England and France in con- 
 cert. The destruction of the Egyptian fleet would neither 
 add to the strength of the Porte nor induce the enemy to 
 abate his pretensions in the sKghtest degree. The material 
 and moral power which at this moment he exercises hy land, 
 would render his action much less dependent than is sup- 
 posed on his maritime resources. To attack him when he is 
 not disposed to attack, would be to run the risk of driving 
 him to extremes. Feeling convinced, when his ships were 
 taken from him, of having nothing more to fear from Europe, 
 who would thus have exhausted her means of coercion in a 
 comparatively secondary object, he would naturally conclude 
 that it was no longer necessary to temporize ; and even svip- 
 posing that he abstained from ordering the immediate ad- 
 vance of Ibrahim on Constantinople, it would suffice, for a 
 threatening diversion, to excite such a rising in Asia Minor, 
 Macedonia, and Albania, as would revive the question of 
 Russian interference. We know unfortunately that he would 
 find ready instruments for this work, and that probably to 
 set it in action, he would not require to move a single 
 soldier. Such eventualities are surely worth the trouble of 
 grave deliberation before they are risked. I must add, that 
 in London they seem to attach too much importance to 
 Mehemet Ali, or rather to his aggrandisement, because they 
 persist in considering that side of the question as if treating 
 of a European state. There can be no doubt that in the
 
 530 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 hands of such a man as the Pacha of Egypt, the possession of 
 extensive territories may entail dangers which explain and 
 justify the efforts of the powers to put a stop to his encroach- 
 ments. France is the first to acknowledge this, and she has 
 never ceased her efforts to restrain the projects and moderate 
 the pretensions of this Pacha. But we must not exaggerate 
 the evil. The Ottoman empire, even divided administratively 
 by stipulations to which the clause of hereditary sovereignty, 
 however expressly conveyed, could not in other respects con- 
 vey a character of conclusive permanence, — the Ottoman 
 empire, united, notwithstanding this partition more or less 
 durable, by the controlling ties of manners and religion, 
 will still continue to form, in face of the European powers, 
 that great body whose existence has ever been considered in- 
 dispensable to the maintenance of the political balance. The 
 resources it still possesses in both its existing divisions concur 
 equally to this end, and I do not hesitate to say that in ruining 
 the Pacha of Egypt we shall operate the destruction of the 
 Ottoman empire. Our policy to-day, as from the commence- 
 ment of the crisis, ought to be to take care, above all other 
 considerations, that Constantinople receives no foreign pro- 
 tection without our common consent. 
 
 Such are the objections suggested to the King's government 
 by the proposition of the cabinet of London, and which prevent 
 tin unqualified adhesion. Be so good as to make them known 
 to Lord Palmerston, while indicating to him the course which 
 we consider preferable. It consists, you will observe, in repeat- 
 ing our demand for the restitution of the Ottoman fleet, and 
 in case of a refusal on the part of Mehemet Ali, in declaring 
 to him that henceforward he must look upon the allied 
 squadrons as mutually and specially instructed to repulse all 
 attempts directed against the territory or authority of the 
 Porte. The English cabinet will, I doubt not, on reflection, 
 acknowledge that such an attitude suffices for the necessities 
 of the moment ; that without any compromise, it will attain,
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 531 
 
 according to all probability, the end which France and 
 England have in view ; and that placed, to our great regret, 
 under the impossibility of acceding without reserve to the 
 plan of the British government, we could not more effectually 
 evince our absolute confidence and the perfect accordance of 
 .our policy with theirs. 
 
 . 22. Baron de Bourqueney to Marshal Soult 
 
 Monsieur le Marechal, London, August 9th, 1839. 
 
 Lord Palmerston informed me yesterday that according to 
 news from Berlin (Lord Clanricarde's informations are slow and 
 rare), Kussia withdrew from the projected negotiations at 
 Vienna. M. de Kisseleff, who followed me at Lord Palmer- 
 ston's, was charged with a communication to this effect. 
 It is under a plea of respect for the independence of sovereign 
 states that the Eussian cabinet declines all intervention in 
 the internal affairs of Turkey. Before the events in Syria, 
 before the death of the Sultan, when there was no other pos- 
 sible issue than war to the disputes between the Porte and 
 Egypt, the Eussian cabinet felt disposed to participate in the 
 opinion of the other powers of Em-ope as to a negotiation 
 carried on independently of the interested parties. But now, 
 when the Porte itself anticipates an arrangement, and ad- 
 dresses acceptable overtures to Egypt, Eussia is of opinion 
 that the treaty in progress at Constantinople should be 
 allowed to advance, and should be seconded only by her good 
 qfices ; otherwise there is no longer an independent Ottoman 
 power. Such is the spirit of the step taken by M. de Nessel- 
 rode. 
 
 The King's government will feel no surprise at this overture 
 from the cabinet of St. Petersbourg, which the correspondence 
 of your Excellency has repeatedly foretold.
 
 532 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 Here, where they readily believe what they wish, more 
 confidence had been evinced, not in the sincerity of Russia's 
 intentions, but in the necessities of her European position. 
 They therefore indicate more surprise than will be exhibited 
 in Paris, but they now comprehend the motives which dictated 
 M. de Nesselrode's last despatch, and they read in it an evi- 
 dent proof that if the Imperial cabinet does not consider the 
 appropriate moment arrived for committing itself openly with 
 Europe on the affairs of the East, it is, at least, determined 
 to struggle against the written guarantees which might 
 threaten to control it for the future. 
 
 Lord Palmerston received the communication of M. de 
 Kisseleff with due courtesy, but he left him under no delu- 
 sion as to the opinion he had formed of it. 
 
 While entirely deferring yesterday to the wish manifested 
 by the King's government relative to the draft of instructions 
 to the admirals, Lord Palmerston entered more than he 
 usually does into the discussion of the general question. In 
 reply to that part of your Excellency's despatch (No. 36), 
 which combats the predisposition of the English cabinet to 
 reduce the limits of the Eg}^tian sovereignty, Lord Palmer- 
 ston informed me that with himself and many of his col- 
 leagues, it was a strongly determined point, that nothing 
 useful or permanent could be established in the East unless 
 the provinces wrested from the Porte by Mehemet Ali were 
 restored. " I cannot too often repeat to you," Lord Palmer- 
 ston resumed, " how entirely this conviction is, as far as I am 
 concerned, independent of all political considerations ex- 
 clusively English ! But I suppose Egypt and Syria heredi- 
 tarily invested in the family of Mehemet Ali, and I then, 
 ask myself how can Europe flatter herself that an incident of 
 the most trifling nature may not arise to break the last and 
 feeble tie which unites those provinces to the Ottoman empire. 
 Independence will come as heirship came ; and do you con- 
 sider what Europe will then say when Eussia resumes her sus-
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 533 
 
 pended cravings after the European provinces? That the 
 Ottoman empire, dismembered by the separation of a part of 
 its Asiatic provinces, is no longer worth the risk of a war for 
 its maintenance." i 
 
 " Such," continued Lord Palmerston, " is the order of ideas 
 that occur to me when deliberating on this great question. But 
 I by no means rely on the infallibility of my o-svn judgment. 
 I perfectly understand that others may differ from me, and 
 I look for no French jprejpossession in the opinion you have 
 conveyed to me from Marshal Soult. I am so well convinced 
 of the good faith of that policy, that here is an argument which 
 could confirm me, had I still any inclination to doubt. 
 France wishes to make Egypt stronger than we do, and yet 
 your influence over the sovereign of Alexandria, be he who he 
 may, would increase by reason of his weakness ! You see now 
 whether I seek for any reserved thoughts in the discrepancies 
 between our two points of view." 
 
 I replied to Lord Palmerston that his reasoning supposed 
 a question to be settled which was at least open to contro- 
 versy, namely, that of ascertaining whether in a future, more 
 or less remote, the Ottoman empire could gather from Egypt 
 and Syria the elements of strength and vitality, — elements 
 which it would be a great error to disperse if they could, one 
 day or other, be turned to the advantage of the body we were 
 anxious to preserve. 
 
 " That is true," replied Lord Palmerston ; " and I agree 
 with you that the question lies there. My own conviction is 
 fixed in the negative ; but there are members of the English 
 cabinet who decide affirmatively." 
 
 • ••••• 
 
 Your Excellency will undoubtedly perceive that there is a 
 difference between the two cabinets on an important point ; 
 but such is the identity of the object proposed b}^ both, so 
 great is the absence of all mistrust, of all reserved meaning, 
 that I feel strongly convinced some slight mutual concessions 
 
 VOL. IV. NN
 
 534 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 as to the means to be employed, would suffice to maintain 
 between the two governments the perfect understanding 
 which, until now, has directed their proceedings, and can 
 alone render them efifectual. 
 
 I pray you to accept, &c. 
 
 BOURQUENEY. 
 
 23. Baron de Bourqueiiey to Marshal Suult, 
 
 London, August 17th, 1829. 
 Monsieur le Marechal, 
 
 • ••••• 
 
 Yesterday evening Lord Palmerston received news from 
 Constantinople to the 29th of July, and from Vienna to the 
 10th of Auoust. The first announced the remission of the 
 collective note signed by the ambassadors of the five courts, 
 and the immediate suspension of the direct treaty between 
 the Porte and Mehemet Ali. 
 
 The news from Vienna represents Prince Metternich as 
 advancing steadily in the path on which he has entered, and 
 confident in the hope of inducing Kussia to follow, or rather 
 of preventing her from escaping from it with credit. 
 
 Under the impression of this intelligence the council de- 
 bated this morning on the plan of instructions to be for- 
 warded to Admiral Stopford for the special case of the 
 restitution of the Ottoman fleet. 
 
 The council approves of that portion of the instructions to 
 Admiral Lalande, in the event of the Turkish fleet being 
 under sail. 
 
 Should the fleet have entered the port of Alexandria, the 
 council is of opinion that our consuls ought to summon the 
 enemy to restore it under a throat of their departure ; but 
 in compliance with the concert which appears to manifest 
 itself at Constantinople, by the despatch of the 29th of July,
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 535 
 
 and with the satisfactory dispositions of the Austrians, evi- 
 dently increasing, it also expresses a wish, " that the French 
 and English cabinets should forward their instructions to the 
 admirals to Vienna, and, at the same time, propose to the 
 Austrian cabinet to unite its squadron to ours in case the 
 Ottoman fleet should be at sea within the limits of action 
 designated in the orders to Admiral Lalande, and to associate 
 their consul-general with ours in the measure proposed, 
 should the Turkish fleet have entered the port of Alex- 
 andria." 
 
 In conclusion, the council, after examining the project 
 previously set forward by Lord Palmerston for carrying 
 out an act to guarantee the integrity of the Ottoman empire, 
 between France, England, and Austria (giving up the hope 
 of associating the two other powers), accords the most unquali- 
 fied approbation to this proposal, and recognizes, at the same 
 time, that the negotiation ought to be conducted with great 
 reserve, so as to refrain from alarming Eussia, and from afford- 
 ing her the means of impeding it. The council thinks that 
 this would be in reality a commencement of the work of 
 peace and of the balance of power, which France and Eng- 
 land are equally anxious to accomplish. 
 
 Since the commencement of the Eastern crisis I have never 
 seen Lord Palmerston so well satisfied with the aspect of 
 affairs. 
 
 I pray you to accept, &c. 
 
 BOURQUENET. 
 
 24. Baron de Bourqueney to Marshal Soult. 
 
 London, August 18th, 1839. 
 Monsieur le Marechal, 
 
 • ••••• 
 
 . . . . I was only able to forward an extremely con- 
 cise account to your Excellency of the last intelligence from 
 
 NN 2 
 
 \
 
 536 ITISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 Vienna ; but I was anxious to inform you without delay of 
 the profound impression it had produced on the English 
 cabinet. 
 
 The two predominating facts are: 1st. The signature of 
 M. de Eoutenief attached to a collective note, declaring that, 
 in the accordance of the five great powers on the affairs of 
 the East, the Ottoman Porte had found a sufficient guarantee 
 against the dangers of its position to enable it to break off all 
 direct negotiation with the viceroy. 2nd. The immediate 
 interruption of that same negotiation. 
 
 Neither the despatches of M. de Barante to your Excel- 
 lency, nor those of Lord Clanricarde to Lord Palmerston, nor 
 even the last communications of Prince Metternich, had pre- 
 pared our courts for this sudden adhesion of the Russian 
 ministry to a measure of so much importance. In London, 
 as imdoubtedly in Paris, they reasoned on the general datum 
 that the Russian cabinet not only declined participating in 
 the negotiation of Vienna, but sought to render it futile by 
 favourinoj the conclusion of a direct arrangfement between 
 the sovereign and his vassal without any foreign interven- 
 tion whatever, at least any that could be apparent. 
 
 Here, they have not given themselves much trouble to ex- 
 plain a fact in open contradiction with the dispositions which 
 were not even held in doubt on the day before it was made 
 known. They repeat readily ; " Russia will not, because she 
 cannot. M. de Boutenief has heard the name of the Dar- 
 danelles pronounced by France and England, and so has passed 
 on to the step she has taken." (This last hypothesis, before 
 forming a definitive judgment, requires that the act of the 
 minister should be acknowledged by his court.) But all these 
 explicatory considerations are sacrificed to the simple fact, and 
 people say; " Here has Russia joined the co-operation by an 
 official act ; she could not keep aloof from it but by provoking 
 complications for ivhich she is not prepared.^^ 
 
 From this first datum, the English cabinet, in its consulta 
 
 to
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 537 
 
 tions of yesterday, has decided that the moment has arrived 
 for relaxing in some degree the threatening and suspicious 
 attitude assumed towards the Eussian cabinet, without pre- 
 judice to its resumption hereafter under a more decided form 
 should circumstances so require. . 
 
 It feels, moreover, that an act of respect is due to Prince 
 de Metternich for his perseverance in the course he has 
 adopted in common with France and England, a perseverance 
 which manifested itself at Vienna on the 8th of August, 
 when there was reason to believe that the Eussian cabinet 
 declined all concert with the other powers, but the expression 
 of which became more clear and decisive on the 10th, after 
 receipt of the news from Constantinople of the 29th of July. 
 
 Under the influence of this double exprdfesion, Monsieur 
 le Marechal, the English cabinet proposes to forward to 
 Vienna a copy of our instructions to the admirals, relative to 
 the defection of the Ottoman fleet, so that there may not be a 
 single act of the drama now beginning to unfold itself, from 
 which France and England may appear disposed at this mo- 
 ment to isolate the allied powers, and most especially the 
 cabinet of Austria. 
 
 Your Excellency is aware that the English cabinet has not 
 considered the attitude of observation prescribed to our 
 admirals as sufficient, in case the Ottoman fleet should have 
 entered the port of Alexandria, or the viceroy may have 
 refused its restitution. To the demand of our consular ao-ents 
 it has thought of adding means of moral coercion; sach as 
 the retirement of our consuls-general ; but this part of the 
 question it equally proposes to the King's government to 
 transfer to Vienna, and to treat it there in common with the 
 Austrian cabinet. 
 
 Your Excellency will perceive by what precedes, the 
 extent of the change which has taken place, within thirty- 
 eight hours, in the spirit of the members of the English 
 cabinet. 
 
 N N 3
 
 538 IIISTOKIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 The possibility of the concurrence of Kiissia was positively 
 denied ; now it is hoped for. 
 
 The concurrence of Austria was hoped for to the end ; now 
 it is assured. 
 
 I have now, as I think, explained the motives upon which 
 the satisfaction, exaggerated perhaps, is founded, which has dis- 
 played itself here since the reception of the news from Vienna 
 and Constantinople, mth regard to the position in all its 
 bearings. 
 
 They start from the principle that, when once the bases of 
 the intervening arrangement between the Sultan and the 
 viceroy are determined by the five powers, the employment 
 of force will be superfluous to obtain their acceptance by 
 Mehemet Ali ; '" a menace will suffice in case of his refusal. 
 With respect to these bases, Austria is supposed to incline 
 more closely than France to the views of the English cabinet, 
 and as it is well known that the official differences manifested 
 between the two great maritime powers might sap all the 
 foundations of the pacific work in hand, it is presumed that 
 these differences will dissolve more readily in a concurrence 
 of the five powers than in a direct negotiation between two 
 or even three. 
 
 When once the arrangement between the sovereign and the 
 vassal is accepted and guaranteed by the powers of Europe, 
 that is to say, the practical question regulated, they feel con- 
 fident of finding in Paris, and it is hoped in Vienna also, the 
 eagerness that will be manifested here to crown this act of 
 peace for the present by a diplomatic transaction which may 
 equally secure the future. 
 
 • •••••» 
 
 I pray you to accept, &c. 
 
 BOURQUENET.
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 539 
 
 25. Marshal Soult to Baron de Boiirqueney. 
 
 Paris, August 22nd, 1839. 
 • •••.*• 
 
 The King's government regards as a fortunate circum- 
 stance the adhesion of the Porte to the measure by which the 
 five powers have engaged it to conchide no treaty, except 
 under their concurrence, with the Pacha of Egypt ; an adhe- 
 sion of which, however, the official intelligence has not yet 
 reached me. Meanwhile we do not attach much weight to 
 the lively joy which this event seems to have caused in 
 Vienna, and more particularly in London. There is, as I 
 think, even an excess of exaggeration in concluding that be- 
 cause M. de Boutenief has associated himself Avith this step, 
 Eussia has determiaed henceforward to link her actions in the 
 Eastern question to that of the allied courts. A result of this 
 importance, such a deviation from the prosecution of a policy 
 hitherto immutable, can scarcely be presumed ; to believe 
 it, the most formally declared evidences could not be too 
 much, and these evidences I look for in vain. So far from 
 this, the correspondence of M. de Barante exhibits to me the 
 cabinet of St. Petersbourg proceeding more than ever in its 
 isolated views, even where believing itself compelled to admit 
 some concessions of form. Moreover, to appreciate the 
 true bearing of the act to which such important conse- 
 quences are attached, it is enough to remember that amongst 
 the arguments set forward by the Eussian government in 
 rejection of the proposed conference at Vienna, one was parti- 
 cularly conspicuous, which maintained that the seat of nego- 
 tiation would more naturally be fixed at Constantinople ; 
 implying in fact, that Eussia, by the natural ascendancy 
 which her envoy exercises upon the Porte, would be more 
 advantageously placed there, either to impede or influence 
 the progress of the treaty. 
 
 N N 4
 
 540 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 If I dwell on the exaggerated hopes which the cabinet of 
 London appears to have conceived, it is because I fear lest 
 this misconception should impress a false tendency on its 
 policy, and may induce it to lose sight of the essential end 
 towards which PVance and England are equally directed, — 
 the means of preventing the Porte from falling back under the 
 exclusive and dominant protection of one of the great powers. 
 In London, I incline to think they are too confident on this 
 point, and disposed to concentrate their anxiety on the danger, 
 relatively a secondary one, of the exclusive aggrandisement of 
 Mehemet Ali. If the expression of the disagreement which 
 exists on this point between France and England were con- 
 fined to the circle of the communications exchanged between 
 the two governments, little inconvenience would then result ; 
 but, unfortunately, I acquire every day a positive convic- 
 tion that it is not so. The cabinet of London, governed 
 by its prepossessions, does not sufficiently conceal them from 
 the other cabinets ; it sometimes appears to see in them 
 auxiliaries whose co-operation may assist it to bring us into 
 its way of thinking, and the courts to which it addresses 
 these confidences, mistaking the intentions by which they are 
 dictated, discover in them a serious relaxation of the Anglo- 
 French alliance. Already several indications give me reason 
 to think that one of these courts is endeavouring by advances, 
 adroitly calculated, by apparent concessions, to draw the 
 British government into a new course. I have little fear of the 
 definitive result of these attempts. England will resist them as 
 we have ourselves resisted them at other times, when similar 
 artifices were employed in respect to us. But it would be 
 lamentable if simple appearances should for a single moment 
 inspire the authors of these machinations with the slightest 
 hopes of success. Little more wovild be wanting to infuse 
 a most injurious perturbation into the progress of the general 
 policy. 
 
 Lord Granville has, as yet, said nothing to me on the new
 
 HISTOKIC DOCUMENTS. 541 
 
 views of his court with respect to the means of obtaining 
 the restitution of the Ottoman fleet. I imagine that in 
 London they will have recognised the unseasonableness of the 
 mutual recall of tlie consuls at the moment when the decision 
 adopted at Constantinople renders the presence of Euro- 
 pean agents near Mehemet Ali more indispensable than 
 ever. 
 
 • •••••• 
 
 General Baudrand will not be sent to Constantinople, as I 
 apprised you. The King, on learning the names of the 
 persons entrusted by the Emperors of Austria and Eussia 
 with an analogous mission has thought it more suitable to 
 send an officer of his household less elevated in rank. 
 
 26. General Sebastiani to Marshal Soult 
 
 London, September 5th, 1839, 
 Monsieur le Marechal, 
 
 • •••••• 
 
 . . . I have to render an account to your Excellency of 
 my first interview with Lord Palmerston. 
 
 Before entering on the questions which have been sepa- 
 rately discussed, I must declare to your Excellency that my 
 impression resulting from this conference is, that the English 
 cabinet desires with us, to the same extent, and as com- 
 pletely without mental reservation, the maintenance of the in- 
 dependence and integrity of the Ottoman empire ; and that 
 it wishes to accomplish this end pacifically, without compro- 
 mising the great powers amongst themselves. 
 
 • ••••« 
 
 I took the first opportunity which presented itself of dis- 
 cussing and combating the measures proposed by the
 
 542 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 English cabinet, and communicated by Mr. Bidwer to your 
 Excellency. 
 
 I commenced by establishing that the question of the 
 Ottoman fleet ought not to be treated specially, and pre- 
 liminarily to the final arrangements now about to commence 
 between the Sultan and the Pacha. I said we ought not to 
 employ our strength against an incident, but to reserve it 
 entire for the principal fact. I even enjoined Lord 
 Palmerston to reflect seriously on the consequences of suc- 
 cess, that is to say, on the return of the Ottoman fleet to 
 Constantinople with a body of officers imbued with admira- 
 tion for Mehemet Ali, and little confident themselves, in 
 spite of the guarantee of the powers, against the reactionary 
 vengeance of the Porte. 
 
 These last arguments produced an impression on • Lord 
 Palmerston's mind. He replied, nevertheless, that if the 
 powers, all equally penetrated as they were "svith the neces- 
 sity of repressing, or rather of repairing, an act so culpable 
 on the part of a vassal against his sovereign, should pause 
 before a peremptory refusal of Mehemet Ali, he, on his side, 
 would feel more encouraged in his resistance to the accepta- 
 tion of a final arrangement. 
 
 I represented the full weight of the motives which ought to 
 restrain us from an armed demonstration against the island of 
 Candia ; I spoke of the Greek party who might take advantage 
 of it to declare their independence, and I added that it would 
 disseminate throughout the remainder of the empire the ex- 
 ample and necessity of internal risings. I hope I have con- 
 vinced Lord Palmerston that no substantial advantage could 
 accrue from the occupation of Candia by the forces of 
 England and France. 
 
 I discussed with him the recall of the consuls-general from 
 Alexandria, and I demonstrated the serious inconveniences 
 that must result from leaving us without agents near the 
 viceroy at the very moment when we have the most pressing 
 need of influencing his mind l)y active communication.
 
 HISTOEIC DOCUMENTS. 543 
 
 Lord Beanvale has already received instructions and powers 
 relative to the Ottoman fleet ; I cannot, therefore, lead your 
 Excellency to hope that these instructions will be recalled or 
 even modified ; but the question being carried to the very 
 centre of negotiation, the influence of the King's govern- 
 ment may exercise itself there in a powerful manner, and I 
 believe that even from London, those points will be indicated 
 to Lord Beauvale on which he is not to insist, if he perceives 
 the course adopted by France to be entirely opposed to that 
 of England. 
 
 I cannot, however, conceal from your Excellency that the 
 disposition of the English cabinet to the employment of 
 coercive measures against Mehemet Ali, whether to obtain 
 the restitution of the Turkish fleet, or to make him accept 
 exclusively the hereditary sovereignty of Egypt on the basis 
 of the impending arrangements with the Porte, may from 
 time to time yield upon certain points to the representations 
 of France, hut it incessantly re-appears, and if it encounters 
 on our part an invincible and absolute repugnance to the 
 adoption of violence in some shape against the viceroy, I fear 
 they will persuade themselves here that it is useless to con- 
 tinue a negotiation in which even the eventual sanction of 
 force is denied beforehand. 
 
 I endeavoured to excite the apprehensions of Lord Palmer- 
 ston on the consequences to which the peace of the world would 
 be exposed from the extreme measures to which the viceroy 
 might be driven if the powers persisted in refusing the con- 
 ditions he exacted for his reconciliation with the Porte. 
 Lord Palmerston replied that unquestionably a march on 
 Constantinople was possible, but that nothing would be easier 
 to the European powers than the preservation of the Ottoman 
 capital; that we should all concur in that object with our 
 fleets, and Eussia with her armies ; but that we should limit 
 the amount of the Eussian troops and fix the date of their 
 departure. " We should arrive together," he continued, 
 " and we should depart together. Eussia is fettered at this
 
 544 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 moment, be assured of it. I know to a certainty that this 
 arises from her not being prepared ; but it is a fact, and we 
 ought to take advantage of it. She will not act without us, 
 and if she acts at all it will be with us, and in the same 
 manner." 
 
 Lord Palmerston spoke to me of the dispositions of the 
 Prussian cabinet and of the cabinet of Vienna, as agreeing 
 entirely with those of the cabinet of London in all that 
 relates to the bases of the final arrangement between the 
 Porte and the viceroy. 
 
 Lord Palmerston has replied to the last Russian com- 
 munication by a despatch to Lord Clanricarde which he 
 allowed me to read, and in which he formally establishes the 
 union and mutual responsibility of France and England in 
 all that relates to the conjoined entry of our sc^uadrons into 
 the sea of JMarmara. 
 
 • ••••*•••• 
 
 I redoubled my efforts to bring back the point of view of 
 the English cabinet to that of the Kind's orovernment. 
 Lord Palmerston, with respect to the withdrawal of our 
 consuls-general from Alexandria, informed me that he never 
 thought of extending that measure to the actual consular 
 agents ; that it was only on account of the diplomatic cha- 
 racter of our consuls-general that he wished to make this 
 recall a demonstration of discontent on the part of the 
 powers against Mehemet Ali ; but that we should maintain, 
 after their departure, should it take place, acting consuls who 
 would still serve as organs with the viceroy. Lord Palmerston 
 also informed me that, under any circumstances. Colonel 
 Campbell would be replaced by another agent. His conduct 
 during late events was not approved of, and his successor 
 was appointed. Lord Palmerston has just received de- 
 spatches from Constantinople, informing him that an 
 Egyptian brig had carried agents of the viceroy to Salonica. 
 Lord Ponsonby had ordered Admiral Stopford to chase the
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 545 
 
 Egyptian brig, to take possession of her, and to secure the 
 faihire of her mission. Admiral Koussin had signified his 
 approbation of this measure. 
 
 I pray you to accept, &c. 
 
 H. Sebastiani. 
 
 27. General Sebastiani to Marshal Soult. 
 
 London, September 2Zrd, 1839, 
 Monsieur le Marechal, 
 
 Lord Palmerston passed several hours this morning 
 in London. I have to detail to your Excellency the important 
 conversation I have just held with him. 
 
 Baron Brunnow proposes in the name of his government 
 to regulate and define the degree of coercive action to be 
 exercised by each of the five powers against Mehemet Ali 
 to obtain a final settlement between the Sultan and the 
 Pacha. With this object, a convention to be signed between 
 the five courts, stipulating that France and England shall 
 employ their fleets against Mehemet Ali if he refuses to 
 accept the proposed conditions ; that Russia, in the event of 
 Ibrahim Pacha advancing upon Constantinople, shall employ 
 her army and fleet in the Bosphorus and in Asia Minor, on 
 their side of the Taurus, to protect the existence of the Ottoman 
 empire, but that for the future the closing of the Bosphorus 
 and the Dardanelles shall remain a principle of public 
 European law, and that Russia shall pledge herself not to 
 renew the treaty of Unkiar-Skelessi. Finally, it is to be 
 understood, although not specified in writing, that under 
 existing circumstances, the derogation of Russia from the 
 principle of closing the two straits is to be admitted with- 
 out authorising the maritime powers to consider it a legiti-
 
 546 iiisTomc docuaients. 
 
 mate reason for the presence of their respective fleets in the 
 Bosphorus. 
 
 This convention Russia proposes to the acceptance of the 
 four powers, but she is ready to sign it here with three, if 
 France is not inclined to admit the stipulations. 
 
 Such is the substance of the propositions of which Baron 
 Brunnow is the organ ; I need not dwell on the immense 
 importance of their bearing. 
 
 Lord Palmerston informed me that he should speedily sum- 
 mon the members of the cabinet at present in the neighbour- 
 hood of Windsor or London, to lay before them the state of the 
 question ; but he did not conceal from me that he was per- 
 sonally favourable to the Russian overtures. It is probable 
 that the determination of the cabinet may conform to the 
 opinions of Lord Palmerston. 
 
 I asked what bases Russia proposed to give to the arrange- 
 ment between the Sultan and the Pacha ? Lord Palmerston 
 replied that M. de Brunnow was not charged with any 
 specific proposition to that effect, but that the Russian 
 cabinet, like that of England, was in favour of the complete 
 restoration of Syria and its appendages. 
 
 Lord Palmerston is inclined to add to the Russian project 
 the despatch of an Austrian corps to Syria in the event of 
 the viceroy's resistance. This corps, united to the relics of 
 the Ottoman army, to obtain by force the evacuation of the 
 provinces held by the Egyptian army. 
 
 I began by declaring that I was without instructions from 
 the King's government on the greater part of the questions 
 submitted to me ; but, that I felt nevertheless authorised 
 to reject and contest, at least in my own name, nearly all the 
 data on which the new plan, proposed by Russia and almost 
 adopted by England, is founded. 
 
 Object, means, and facility of execution, I equally 
 objected to. I argued on the consideration that Mehemet 
 AH, hereditary possessor of Egypt and Syria, would naturally
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 547 
 
 fall within the sphere of the influence and action of the two 
 maritime powers ; and that these same powers could in their 
 turn employ the Egyptian forces to restrain Eussia in her 
 projects on Constantinople. I shall not tire your Excellency 
 by a repetition of the arguments I used ; they are all drawn 
 from the order of ideas and facts set forward by the King's 
 government in its correspondence with the embassy. 
 
 It is evident to me, that the English cabinet regards the 
 abolition of the treat}^ of Unkiar-Skelessi as an ample success 
 for its actual policy in the East. Now, this success it does 
 not consider as too dearly purchased by the appearance of 
 Eussian forces in the Bosphorus ; and, moreover, as this mea- 
 sure is dependent on the advance of Ibrahim Pacha against 
 Constantinople, it hopes to lay down a hypothesis that will 
 not be realised. 
 
 I told Lord Palmerston that the convention, the bases of 
 which he had explained to me, would be treated in Europe 
 as an act of weakness and pusillanimity towards Eussia. He 
 considers it, on the contrary, as an able measure. The very 
 action of Eussia at Constantinople, defined beforehand by 
 the concurrence of the other powers, seems to him the 
 action of the five courts and an abdication of the exclusively 
 Eussian protectorate. 
 
 Your Excellency's last despatch enabled me to demonstrate 
 to Lord Palmerston how far, up to this point, the different 
 cabinets are from agreeing as to the activity and energy of 
 actual measures against Mehemet Ali. Lord Palmerston 
 replied that he could not doubt for an instant that the propo- 
 sitions of which M. de Brunnow was the bearer would receive 
 the most sincere and cordial support from the cabinets of 
 Vienna and Berlin. 
 
 Prince Esterhazy, who saw Lord Palmerston to-day, 
 opened the interview by pleading the absence of instructions 
 from his court, to avoid giving any opinion on all the new 
 projects submitted to him, and particularly as to the despatch
 
 54.8 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 of an Austrian corps to Syria ; but evidently he feels con- 
 vinced that the plan of the Russian cabinet will be approved 
 of by the Austrian government. 
 
 The restoration of the Turkish fleet is now confounded - 
 with the general question from which Lord Palmerston 
 declines to separate it. 
 
 • •••••• 
 
 Lord Palmerston, on my asking him where the negotiation 
 of the convention he had detailed to me would take place, 
 replied, " I have not thought of that, but in London if they 
 please." 
 
 I pray you to accept, &c. 
 
 H. Sebastiani. 
 
 28. General Sebastiani to Marshal Soult. 
 
 London, October Srd, 1839. 
 
 Monsieur le Marechal 
 
 The English cabinet rejects the proposals from the imperial 
 cabinet presented by the Baron de Bruunow. Lord Palmer- 
 ston announced this morning to the Russian envoy, that 
 France, on her part, could not consent to the exclusion of the 
 allied fleets from the sea of Marmara in the event of the 
 entry of Russian forces into the Bosphorus, and that England 
 would not separate herself from France, with whom she had 
 moved in perfect union from the commencement of the 
 negotiation. 
 
 This point being determined, — in place of the convention 
 originally presented by the imperial cabinet. Lord Palmerston 
 proposes an act between the five powers, by which they would 
 regulate their share of action in the existing crisis of Eastern 
 affairs, but without any privilege accorded to the Russian
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 549 
 
 flag to the exclusion of the flags of France, England and 
 Austria. Eussia, in case of the resistance of Mehemet Ali 
 to the conditions proposed to him, to employ her troops in 
 Asia Minor, but on their own side of the Taurus. The indepen- 
 dence and integrity of the Ottoman empire under the reign- 
 ing dynasty to be stipulated for, for the longest possible 
 time ; finally, the closing of the Straits to become a principle 
 of public European law. 
 
 Such is the important modification attached by the British 
 cabinet to the Russian overtures. 
 
 Passing from the European act I have here analyzed, to 
 the conditions of the arrangement pending between the 
 Sultan and the Pacha, Lord Palmerston, pressed at once by 
 my arguments and by a sincere desire, as I believe, to per- 
 form an act of deference to France, after a long discussion, 
 adds to the hereditary investiture of Egypt in favour of 
 Mehemet Ali, the possession equally hereditary of the Pacha- 
 lic of Acre : the town of Acre alone to remain to the Porte, 
 and the portion to be measured from the glacis of the fortress 
 in the direction of Lake Tiberias. The Porte to recover all 
 the rest of Syria, including the Holy Cities, considerations of 
 preponderating weight in the estimation of the English cabi- 
 net : this second concession rests on the datum that the Kino-'s 
 government, having agreed with its allies on the territorial 
 limits of the arrangement, will accept its share of action in 
 constraining Mehemet Ali, should he refuse the conditions. 
 
 This new position results from our persevering efforts to 
 bring back the English cabinet to the same point of view 
 with France on the Eastern question. Undoubtedly this 
 return is not as complete as we could desire, but the actual 
 step is of the highest importance. I fear, however, it will be 
 the last. 
 
 I asked how Baron de Brunuow had received the announce- 
 ment of such a serious modification in the final dispositions 
 of the British cabinet. Lord Palmerston replied that he took 
 
 VOL. IV. O O
 
 550 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 these new proposals ad referendum. His disappointment 
 must have been excessive. 
 
 Lord Pahnerston appears to flatter himself that we shall 
 induce Kussia to accede to the European act he proposes. I 
 do not see the data on which he bases this confidence ; but 
 whatever they may decide on at St. Petersbourg, it is not the 
 less highly important to have arrested here all arrangement 
 independent of France, and to have restored the English 
 cabinet to its first sentiment of the necessity of our alliance. 
 I pray you to accept, &c. 
 
 H. Seb.vstiani. 
 
 29. General Sehastiani to Marshal Soult. 
 
 London, October 10th, 1839. 
 Monsieur le Marechal, 
 
 • "^ • • • • • 
 
 I have read your Excellency's last despatch to Lord 
 Palmerston. He had already been prepared by Mr. Bulwer, 
 for the intelligence that the cession of the Pachalic of Acre 
 was not considered sufficient by the King's government. 
 This news has thrown him back upon his former course of 
 argument. I left none of his objections without answer ; but 
 I convinced myself yesterday that it would be almost a hope- 
 less task to attempt to obtain anything beyond the last con- 
 cession. Lord Palmerston enlarged upon the importance of 
 this sacrifice, made in the hope of renewing his first ties with 
 France, and gave me clearly to understand that if the English 
 cabinet found itself disappointed in this attempt, it would 
 necessarily be forced to seek elsewhere the support it could 
 no longer find in us. 
 
 • •••••• 
 
 Nothing will be done here until the final determination 
 of the King's government is positively and formally an-
 
 HISTORIC DOCUIVIENTS. 551 
 
 nounced. . . . My impression is that the English cabinet 
 will return to the first proposals of Eussia if the last conces- 
 sions are rejected. 
 
 Baron de Brunnow embarks on the 13th for Eotterdam. 
 
 Accept, &c. 
 
 H. Sebastiani. 
 
 30. Marshal Soult to General Sebastiani. 
 
 Paris, December 9th, 1839. 
 
 • «••••* 
 
 The news you have given me of the approaching return of 
 M. de Brunnow to London, furnished with full powders to 
 sign a convention regulating on the foot of equality the 
 degrees of protection to be afforded by the powers to the 
 Porte, has excited, as you will readily believe, the most 
 serious attention of the King's government. We impatiently 
 expect the details. If they are such, in fact, as the language 
 of Lord Palmerston leads us to suppose, if they embrace on 
 the part of Eussia an effective abandonment of the excep- 
 tional position she had assumed at Constantinople, if the 
 addition of no secret or indirect clause does not interfere to 
 paralyze, on the other hand, the apparent concessions of the 
 cabinet of St. Petersbourg, I need not tell you that the deter- 
 mination of that cabinet, be the motive what it may, will con- 
 vey to us the most lively satisfaction. It will, in fact, gain 
 our cause, on the point which has constantly appeared to us 
 the most important in the Eastern question ; it will yield us 
 the result we have always had in view, and which for some 
 time we despaired of obtaining. You know that from the 
 origin of the negotiation our object was to deduce from it 
 the abolition of the exclusive protectorate exercised by Eussia 
 
 2
 
 552 IIISTOKIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 over the Sultan, and that we have demonstrated this object 
 to our allies as one that ought to be accomplished by every 
 possible means. We have said and repeated incessantly, that 
 it was at Constantinople, in particular, that the independence 
 of the Porte should be guaranteed, and that the knot of the 
 difficulty lay in that quarter. It is not our fault, if in persist- 
 ing too long to see it, where it was not be found, in the rela- 
 tively secondary questions as they regard Europe, of the rela- 
 tions between the Sultan and the viceroy, complications and 
 embarrassments have been multiplied to the extent of render- 
 ing them almost insoluble. We may now, at last, hope for a 
 return to the true path ; assuredly it is not we who have 
 placed obstacles in the way; and I repeat, if the overtures 
 of Kussia are such as they have been described to you, if they 
 contain nothing more, nothing at least that can change their 
 bearing, I am ready to authorize you to accede to them for- 
 mally. I even go farther ; the King's government, recogniz- 
 ing with its accustomed loyalty, that a convention settled on 
 such bases would signally alter the state of things, would 
 find in it a sufficient motive for submitting itself to a new 
 examination of the Eastern question in its entirety, even with 
 regard to those portions on which each of the powers seems 
 to have so decidedly adopted its opinion that prolonged dis- 
 cussion was considered impossible. 
 
 Such, Count, is the impression conveyed to us by the im- 
 portant intelligence you have just transmitted. I ought not 
 to conceal from you, however, that I have more desire than 
 hope of speedily learning their entire confirmation. I confess 
 that I am apprehensive lest the proposals intrusted to M. de 
 Brunnow should contain some insidious clause which would 
 render our adhesion impossible, and would, undoubtedly, lead 
 also to a fresh refusal on the part of the cabinet of London. 
 I am strengthened in this fear by the impossibility I feel my- 
 self under of accounting for the motives which could induce 
 the Russian government to a concession, just and reasonable
 
 mSTOKIC DOCUMENTS. 553 
 
 without doubt, but to which until now it has manifested such 
 an invincible repugnance. If, indeed, we were inclined to 
 suppose that its idea was to place itself in a position of accord- 
 ing, in concert with England, a more effectual protection to 
 the Porte, and of imposing more rigorous conditions on the 
 Viceroy, this conjecture would find itself falsified by what is 
 now passing at Constantinople. Eedschid Pacha said, in fact, 
 to M. de Pontois that the cabinet of St. Petersbourg had 
 engaged the Porte to treat directly with Mehemet Ali, and 
 that M. de Tattitscheff had given this advice at Vienna to the 
 Ottoman ambassador. Such advice, reasonable in itself, as 
 we think, if there is no change about to take place in the 
 situation, is, nevertheless, very extraordinary on the part of 
 a government which affects to place itself in relations of in- 
 timacy with England. . . . When Lord Palmerston, to 
 strengthen himself in his own convictions, rests on the adhe- 
 sion they receive from the Chancellor of Austria, I can under- 
 stand the tactic he employs in conversation with you, to present 
 matters imder this aspect ; but I find it difficult to believe 
 that he considers really as an adhesion the equivocal declara- 
 tions of the cabinet of Vienna. Austria, after accepting our 
 propositions, ends by acceding in principle to those of Eng- 
 land, but at the same time rejects the measures of constraint 
 which could alone render them effectual. If this is a suffi- 
 cient adhesion in Lord Palmerston's eyes, he is, without 
 doubt, easily satisfied, and we should at least be as 
 much justified in assuming that Austria had adopted our 
 ideas. 
 
 A few words will suffice to tranquillize the anxiety Lord 
 Palmerston has allowed me to discover on the subject of the 
 formation of a squadron of reserve at Toulon. The appoint- 
 ment of Admiral Eosamel has no other object than to give 
 eventually a superior chief to our squadron, commanded by 
 two officers of equal rank, from which inconveniences might 
 arise. There is no question at this moment of augmenting 
 
 GO 3
 
 554 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 our naval forces, and if such should arise, we should not fail 
 to notify it to our allies. 
 
 The last news from Constantinople contains little of interest. 
 Mehemet Ali persists in all his demands. He protests that 
 he will not surrender Adana, at least, unless the governorship 
 is confided to one of his sons. — " It is the key of the house," 
 he says, " and I shall only give it up to a member of my own 
 famil}^" 
 
 , 31. General Sehastiani to Marshal Soult. 
 
 London, January 5tJi, 1840. 
 Monsieur le Marechal, 
 
 • •••••• 
 
 Lord Palmerston, in conformity with his promise, read to 
 me the project of the Eussian proposals left in his hands by 
 M. de Brunnow. After having discussed and commented on 
 its details, he promised to send me a copy to-day that I 
 might forward it this evening to Paris, and take it for the 
 basis of the account of our conversation. 
 
 For the textual communication of the Eussian pamphlet. 
 Lord Palmerston substitutes a sort of summary, extremely in- 
 complete, the blanks in which I shall endeavour to fill up. I 
 followed the reading yesterday with sufficient attention to feel 
 convinced that I shall omit nothing of importance. 
 
 To give substance to the ideas of the cabinet of St. Peters- 
 bourg, while taking care not to impress on them an official 
 character, the finesse of the Eussian envoy has had recourse 
 to a strange expedient : he has consigDed them to an official 
 despatch addressed to another agent of his court. 
 
 On the subject of his interview at Calais with M. de Neu- 
 mann, M. de Brunnow expresses to M. de Tattitscheff" the 
 satisfaction he felt at the despatch of the Austrian diplomatist, 
 the accordance between the two courts of Vienna and St.
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 555 
 
 Petersbourg, of which he considers this mission a pledge, and 
 the hope that M. de Neumann will receive the necessary 
 powers to co-operate in the great results which the Emperor 
 his master has instructed him to prosecute in 'London. 
 
 Then follows the detailed development of the Russian 
 policy, and plans on the Eastern question. 
 
 The court of St. Petersbourg proposes ; 
 
 " That the quarrel between the Porte and the Pacha be 
 definitively settled under the guarantee of the powers by a 
 territorial partition : 
 
 " That the portions offered to the Pacha, with hereditary 
 investment, shall be Egypt and Syria to the fortress of Acre 
 as boundary ; that the restoration of all the other posses- 
 sions held by Mehemet Ali shall be immediately carried 
 out: 
 
 " That in the event of resistance on the part of the Pacha, 
 a choice shall be made of the various coercive measures suc- 
 cessively debated in the preceding communications of the 
 cabinets : 
 
 " That all those of a nature to hasten the settlement of the 
 question shall be instantly and vigorously executed ; but 
 that all shall be abstained from which would seem to en- 
 croach upon the right we desire to see triumphant: 
 
 " That thus, maritime forces shall be despatched to the 
 neighbourhood of Alexandretta, because their armed object 
 would be to threaten the flank of Ibrahim's army ; but that the 
 coasts of Syria should not be declared in a state of blockade, 
 as this would imply that we are in hostility with the legitimate 
 sovereign of territories momentarily occupied by a revolted 
 subject: 
 
 "That a Turkish expedition be directed and supported 
 ao-ainst Candia, but that the consuls shall not be withdrawn 
 from Alexandria, because the measure would be to treat a 
 victorious Pacha too much in the light of a sovereign ; it 
 would, moreover, deprive ourselves of means, influence and 
 
 4
 
 55;] HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 information important to maintain, and would at the same 
 time compromise the commercial interests of the power. 
 
 " The Tur co-Egyptian part of the question being settled, 
 we shall occupy ourselves conjointly, in London, with the 
 European part. 
 
 " The mode of Kussian intervention, in case she should be 
 appealed to by the Porte, will be agreed upon and regulated 
 between the powers. 
 
 " Russia, in the event of the march of Ibrahim Pacha upon 
 Constantinople and of the appeal of the Divan, tvill pass the 
 Bosphorus with troops for disembarkation, and will under- 
 take the defence of Constantinople in the name of Europe. 
 
 " The other powers may then pass the Dardanelles ivith 
 some ships of ivar, to cruise in the waters of the Sea of 
 Marmara, from Broussa to Gallipoli. 
 
 " The number of these ships to be from two to three under 
 each flag. 
 
 " As soon as the object proposed by the powers is attained 
 by the submission of Mehemet Ali, the Porte will resume full 
 and immutable possession of the right of closing the two 
 straits against all the flags of Europe. 
 
 " This right will be equally and formally consecrated in 
 principle by the convention to be held in London, previous 
 to any action in the East. 
 
 " We are certain of the concurrence of Austria, of England, 
 and also of Prussia, on all the above-named points ; we hope 
 that France will not isolate herself from the other powers, 
 but will unite her action to theirs. 
 
 " The Emperor addresses his views to all the cabinets ; his 
 earnest advice is to promote and establisTi the general inter- 
 ests of Europe, &c." 
 
 I have now recapitulated the substance (and I believe my 
 memory to be faithfid) of this confidential despatch, the 
 only written document which up to this time has been received 
 on the negotiation opened by M. de Erunnow.
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS, 557 
 
 I have no time to enter into details, but I imagine I have 
 here transmitted information which will not be without 
 interest for your Excellenc}'-. Yesterda}^, when we reached 
 the paragraph relative to the portion of territory to be 
 assigned to Mehemet Ali^ namely, the cession of Syria to St. 
 Jean d'Acre, Lord Palmerston paused in his reading and ob- 
 served, " I have strongly opposed this idea in my conversa- 
 tion with M. de Brunnow ; it would compromise the 'princi'ple. 
 Egypt alone and the desert for frontier, — this is the true 
 position. I have convinced M. de Brunnow, and I feel certain 
 of the adhesion of the two others." 
 
 Accept, I pray you, &c. 
 
 H. Sebastiani. 
 
 32. General Sebastiani to Marshal Soult. 
 
 London, January 10th, 1840. 
 Monsieur le Marechal, 
 
 • •••••• 
 
 I did not consider it necessary, after the terms in which 
 the last communication of Lord Palmerston had placed me, 
 to evince any eagerness to make known to him the substance 
 of your first despatch ; the arrival of the second, which ap- 
 peared to me to contain at once the complement and corrective 
 which existing circumstances require, has furnished me with 
 a natural opportunity of seeking an interview of which they 
 successively formed the object, and the principal features of 
 which I have now the honour of relating to you. 
 
 To the warning so replete with sense and moderation which 
 your Excellency has again addressed to our ally on the real 
 object which Russia has in view. Lord Palmerston replies : " I 
 never thought of abandoning the alliance, and least of all of 
 sacrificing it to Eussia. The only understanding between 
 Russia and us relates to a special question, that of the East ;
 
 558 HISTORIC documents. 
 
 on all other points the alliance continues ; and even when I 
 say understandinrj behveen Russia and us, I express myself 
 badly ; I ought to say, behveen us and all the powers." 
 
 I then communicated to him the information which had 
 reached the King's government as to the presumed intentions 
 of the Viceroy relative to the possession of Arabia and the 
 Holy Places. Lord Palmerston received it with satisfaction. 
 
 • •••••• 
 
 Accept, &c. 
 
 H. Sebastiani. 
 
 33. Marshal Soult to General Sebastiani. 
 
 Paris, Jcmum-y 20^A, 1840. 
 
 • ••••• 
 
 I am anxious to learn the tone adopted by the diplomatic 
 body, and particularly by the embassies of Austria and Eussia 
 on the last phase in the mission confided to M. de Brunnow. 
 The information you may give me on this point will enable us 
 to understand the bearing of that incident. 
 
 I must also tell you that in the difficult position in which 
 the ministry of her Britannic Majesty appears to be placed 
 at this moment, I regret that I cannot always discover in 
 your correspondence those details and conclusions on the 
 internal state of the country you are in to which your accurate 
 judgment would impart so much value. 
 
 You will see by the accompanying extract that the Russians 
 do not uniformly hold the same language with regard to the 
 conditions to be proposed to Mehemet AH.
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 559 
 
 34. General Sebastiani to Marshal Soult. 
 
 London, Jmmary 20th, 1840. 
 Monsieur le Marechal, 
 
 Lord Palmerston explained to me that before deciding 
 on the plan, the drawing up of which had been intrusted to 
 him, and of which we have spoken at several intervals since 
 the last meeting of the cabinet, he intended to make me 
 acquainted with it. He has done so this morning. 
 
 The plan being as yet only sketched out, and Lord Palmer- 
 ston appearing desirous of having my personal opinion before 
 producing the definitive formula of the English propositions, 
 I venture to request that your Excellency will receive this 
 communication in its exclusively confidential character. 
 
 The plan is that of a convention of eight articles preceded 
 by a preamble. 
 
 The convention is not concluded as in the original project, 
 between the great poivers, but between the great powers on the 
 one part and the Porte on the other. 
 
 The object of the preamble is to state the question in this 
 sense : The powers being convinced that the integrity and 
 repose of the Ottoman empire are important to the balance 
 of power and the peace of Europe, and taking, of common 
 accord, into consideration the circumstances in which the 
 Sultan finds himself, place at his disposal the succours of 
 which he may stand in need to secure the tranquillity of his 
 empire and the submission of his vassal to the conditions it 
 becomes him to offer. 
 
 The Sultan declares that he grants to Mehemet Ali the 
 hereditary investiture of Egypt, on condition of the im- 
 mediate surrender of the other territories occupied by the 
 Pacha, 
 
 In the event of this surrender being refused, or of any 
 movement of the Egyptian army tending to menace Constanti- 
 nople, the Sultan will appeal to the aid of the powers.
 
 5G0 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 This aid, the amount and composition of which is de- 
 termined by consent between the contracting parties, will 
 operate simultaneously. 
 
 The Sultan will at the same time demand from Russia 
 the despatch of six sail of the line and two frigates, having 
 on board troops for disembarkation (Lord Palmerston has 
 not yet fixed the number, but he thinks of proposing 15,000 
 men), which will pass the Bosphorus. 
 
 From France and England, six sail of the line and two 
 frigates (three sail of the line and a frigate under each 
 flag), which will pass the Dardanelles, and cruise on the 
 coast of Asia. 
 
 From Austria a detachment of her squadron, which will 
 accompany the French and English flags to the Sea of 
 Marmara. 
 
 The Sultan being provisionally deprived of his fleet by 
 the treason of the Capitan-Pacha, at his request the com- 
 bined squadrons will cut off communication between Egypt 
 and the coasts of Syria from the ships of the Viceroy, and 
 will seize all transports conveying warlike stores or pro- 
 visions. 
 
 The powers, moreover, will place at the disposition of the 
 Sultan a sufficient convoy to protect the passage and arrival 
 of the governor he may think proper to send to Candia ; 
 these forces will also contribute by maritime interference to 
 secure the re-establishment of the authority of the Porte in 
 that island. 
 
 The object which the Sultan proposes by calling the aid 
 of the powers to the waters of the Sea of Marmara being 
 attained, that auxiliary succour will retire as it was admitted, 
 at the same time. 
 
 The closing of both straits to all flags of war is formally 
 recognized as a permanent and inalienable privilege belong- 
 ing to the Porte, and constitutes henceforward, as heretofore, 
 a portion of public European law.
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 5G1 
 
 Meanwhile, the Porte guarantees, in time of peace, to all 
 merchant flags, free access to the waters of Constantinople, 
 and also to any frigate having on board a diplomatic envoy, 
 under the condition, that only one frigate at a time under 
 such flag will be admitted into the Sea of Marmara. 
 
 Such is in substance the plan which Lord Palmerston has 
 read to me. 
 
 Your Excellency will observe that the measures against 
 the Pacha are limited to the obstacle opposed to the re- 
 victualling of Ibrahim Pacha's army on the one hand, and 
 on the other to the mutual protection of a Turkish govern- 
 ment in Candia. There is no reference to blockade nor to 
 any other eo-action whatever. Your Excellency will re- 
 mark also that there is no question of any communication 
 to be made at Alexandria ; the powers do not acknowledge 
 the independent existence of the Pacha ; they address them- 
 selves solely to the Porte. 
 
 The project has been already communicated to Messrs. 
 de Brunnow and Neumann. 
 
 M. de Brunnow has raised objections to the form, and 
 insists on the return to the original plan of a convention 
 between the powers themselves, who would subsequently act 
 with the Porte in conformity with stipulated clauses. 
 
 It is needless to tell your Excellency, that having been 
 consulted on this point by Lord Palmerston, I neglected 
 nothing which I thought calculated to confirm him in his 
 resolution, and that while maintaining all necessary reserve 
 on the great object of the question, I recommended for adop- 
 tion the form best suited to preserve its European character. 
 
 If I am correctly informed in other particulars, the dissatis- 
 faction of M. de Brunnow is not confined to the mere form of 
 the proposed convention ; but up to this time, the manifes- 
 tation of his discontent is restrained. M. de Neumann, if a 
 credible report can be trusted, is less reserved, and freely 
 exhibits his disappointment at the plan of the English
 
 5G2 msTomc documents. 
 
 cabinet. Altogether, the two special envoys are evidently 
 disconcerted by the turn which the negotiation confided to 
 them has taken. 
 
 Lord Palmerston also invited my opinion as to the utility 
 and convenience of inserting a complemental article, by which 
 the ambassadors of the powers at Constantinople would be 
 charged to superintend the execution of the convention. 
 I thought it right to encourage this idea, which would per- 
 mit and even requii-e the continuance of men-of-war in the 
 Sea of Marmara, under the orders of our resident representa- 
 tives at the Turkish court. 
 
 I need not add that the point of departure of every opinion 
 delivered by me during this conversation has been that of 
 perfect ignorance of the intentions of the King's government, 
 and that I have not uttered a word which Lord Palmerston 
 could interpret as going beyond my own personal ideas. I 
 must merely mention a remark made by his lordship when 
 he finished reading his plan : " That he had drawn it up in 
 such a manner as to render it easy for France to adopt it, 
 and to unite herself to the common action of the other 
 powers." 
 
 Before its official transmission to the King's government 
 this plan may receive important modifications from Lord 
 Palmerston himself, and from the British cabinet in council. 
 As to the council, I believe that the majority, if not the 
 whole body, coincides with Lord Palmerston's ideas. The 
 conversations I have held within the last few days with 
 several of its members lead me to think that their opinion is 
 formed. I neglected nothing in these interviews which might 
 convey to each the true motives by which the policy of the 
 King's government has been directed, and convince them of 
 the sincerity of the desire by which it is animated, of main- 
 taining, to tlie utmost possible extent, the most perfect under- 
 standing with its allies. 
 
 Accept, I pi"ay you, &c. H. Sebastian i.
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 5G3 
 
 35. Marshal Soult to General Sebastiani. 
 
 Paris, January 2Q>th, 1840. 
 Monsieur le Comte, 
 
 I have received the despatch you have done me the 
 honour to forward. The importance of its details has en- 
 gaged the most serious attention of the King's government. 
 You will understand that I do not yet explain myself fully on 
 Lord Palmerston's communication. The confidential cha- 
 racter of that communication, the basis of which, and even 
 the mode of dramng up, were not definitively settled by the 
 British cabinet, demand the less urgently on our part an 
 immediate and official answer, inasmuch as in such a case the 
 object can scarcely be separated from the form. Be that as 
 it may, and without pausing on points of detail, which might 
 require explanation, I do not hesitate to say, that in all that 
 regards the mode of protection to be afforded to the Porte 
 against an eventual advance of Ibrahim Pacha against Constan- 
 tinople, the modifications proposed by Lord Palmerston to 
 the plan of the cabinet of St. Petersbourg appear to me to 
 embrace an important amelioration. The idea of introducing 
 the Porte as a party to the treaty regulating this mode of 
 protection, is especially a most happy concession, and highly 
 advantageous in its bearing. I regret that I cannot equally 
 approve, in Lord Palmerston's project, the part relating to 
 the territorial arrangements to be settled between the Sultan 
 and the Viceroy. We continue to believe that the minister 
 undervalues the resources of Mehemet Ali, the energy of his 
 character, and the moral impossibility of a man of that stamp 
 accepting without resistance conditions which would take 
 from him a considerable part of his material power, with the 
 whole weight of opinion from which he draws his principal 
 reliance. Eather than submit to them, I feel convinced he 
 would expose himself to the greatest extremities, and that 
 even if he suspended the march on Constantinople, he would
 
 564 HISTOIUC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 not hesitate to invade Mesopotamia, and to wrest from the 
 Porte provinces the resources of which would enable him to 
 meet the resolutions of the powers with the most determined 
 resistance. Against such enterprises what would the co-action 
 indicated by the new English plan avail ? What could even 
 the intervention of Russia effect, within the limits to which it is 
 proposed that it should be restrained ? Is it not evident, that 
 having adopted that course, the powers would have no alter- 
 native but to recede before Mehemet Ali, or to revert to the 
 only real mode of protecting the Porte, by authorizing the 
 influence of Eussia in its most extended sense ? Unless de- 
 termined to abandon the Sultan to his weakness, would they 
 not be compelled to allow an Imperial army to traverse Asia 
 Minor and Syria to drive back to Egypt the forces of 
 the Viceroy ? I do not think this extremity would be more 
 agreeable to England than to France. In pointing out to 
 you the insufficiency of the coercive measures proposed by the 
 cabinet of London, I wish above all other points to impress 
 upon you the amount of contradiction in the magnitude of 
 the concessions demanded from Mehemet Ali and the weakness 
 of the ' aeans proposed to extort them. Undoubtedly the 
 cabinet of London persuades itself that the Pacha will yield 
 to the first demonstration of the powers, and that being 
 unable to sustain for any length of time the burdens of a 
 statu quo, rendered more onerous by the sort of blockade we 
 should establish on the coast of Syria, would hasten to relieve 
 himself from it by accepting the proposed arrangement. I 
 firmly believe this to be a mistake ; and even admitting, which 
 is scarcely probable, that Mehemet Ali would not laugh at the 
 idea of plunging Europe into the most fearful complication, 
 the prolongation of the actual statu quo, with its uncertainties 
 and dangers, would be, at the least, the consequence of his 
 passive resistance. It would be a strange miscalculation of 
 the respective positions of the two parties to believe that this 
 prolongation could be more disadvantageous to the Viceroy
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 565 
 
 than to the Sultan. In the state to which the Porte is at 
 present reduced, she particularly requires to recover herself, 
 so as to resume the degree of consistency and consolidation 
 demanded by the general interest ; as also to regain repose, 
 security, and a sentiment of confidence in the future. Such 
 advantages are infinitely more important to her than the im- 
 mediate restitution of certain provinces, which she would find 
 it extremely embarrassing to govern, and the sovereignty over 
 which, under any circumstances, would be secured to her. 
 But the Porte can only reap these advantages by a prompt 
 reconciliation with Mehemet Ali, and to afford this recon- 
 ciliation a reasonable chance of success, it should be founded 
 on bases justly proportioned to the relative force and power 
 of the contracting parties. 
 
 These are the reasons which induce us to look upon it as 
 dangerous and impracticable to impose on Mehemet Ali the 
 conditions enunciated in Lord Palmerston's communication. 
 On our part there is neither obstinacy, blind predilection 
 nor engagement of any description. Our motives are all 
 drawn from the general interest, from the force of things as 
 they exist, and from profound conviction. Let Lord 
 Palmerston consider them as inspired by the most ardent 
 desire for a perfect understanding, and for the establishment 
 between om- two governments of that identity of views and 
 tendencies which would furnish the best guarantee for peace 
 as well as for the interests of both countries. 
 
 It is unncessary to add that the King's government leaves 
 entirely to your own judgment the selection of the time and 
 mode that may appear to you the most suitable for urging 
 with advantage the arguments I now suggest. 
 
 I have received your despatch of the 24th. The details it 
 contains with allusion to the attitude of MM. de Brunnow 
 and Neumann are important. I can readily understand the 
 difficulties Lord Palmerston finds in drawing up his counter- 
 project. I am too anxious to see means of reconcilia- 
 
 VOL. IV. P P
 
 566 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 
 
 tion, between the causes really mixed up with the pacification 
 of the East, spring from these very difficulties, not to en- 
 tertain a certain degree of hope. 
 
 36. General Sehastiani to Marshal Soult. 
 
 Landan, Jamuiry 28th, 1840. 
 Monsieur le Marechal, 
 
 I h^ve just left Lord Palmerston. He has informed me 
 that the Council, consulted by him on the question as to 
 whether the projected convention should be concluded be- 
 tween the five powers only, or between the powers and the 
 Porte, has decided unanimously in favour of the latter view, 
 and that the Sultan ought to be admitted as a contracting 
 party. 
 
 This resolution, the only one as yet definitively settled in 
 the matter, being disposed of, the British cabinet seems neces- 
 sarily to adjourn not only any conclusion but even debate on 
 the negotiation commenced, and to postpone its resumption 
 until sufficient time elapses for the arrival of a Turkish pleni- 
 potentiary. Notwithstanding your Excellency's justly founded 
 impatience to see the solution of a question so full of difficul- 
 ties and dangers, you will find that this delay, with the chance 
 of reconciliation and action that it opens to us, with the new 
 and increasing embarrassment it adds to the attitude and 
 proceedings of the Austrian and Russian envoys, is not with- 
 out advantage for the King's government, and that we may 
 permit ourselves to read a success in every impediment op- 
 posed by the English ministry to the eagerness and activity 
 of MJVI. de Brunnow and Neumann. Such is at least my 
 own conviction, and until I receive fresh orders from your 
 Excellency, by this I shall regulate my conduct and language. 
 ' You will also perceive with satisfaction the decision of the 
 English cabinet to include the rights of the Porte, and the
 
 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. 567 
 
 stipulations concluded by her, within the circle of public 
 European law. 
 
 Your Excellency, in addition, will recognize that, in spite 
 of the daily fluctuations to which a negociation must of 
 necessity submit, in which so many opposite and powerful 
 interests are in presence and in competition (fluctuations, the 
 returns and even the inconsistencies of which are reflected in 
 my correspondence), no interest essential to us has yet been 
 compromised, and no irrevocable position assumed. 
 
 On the territorial question. Lord Palmerston has just 
 informed me that he would endeavour, according to his con- 
 victions, to obtain the utmost possible extent for Mehemet 
 Ali, with a view of facilitating the acceptance, by France, of 
 the bases of the projected arrangement. 
 
 Accept, &c. 
 
 H. Sebastiani. 
 
 37. Baron cle Bourqueney to Marshal Soult 
 
 London, February \Uh, 1840. 
 Monsieur le Marechal, 
 
 • »••••• 
 
 I was about to retire when Lord Palmerston forced me, if I 
 may so say, to ask him whether anything new had occurred 
 since his last conversation with Greneral Sebastiani on the 
 affairs of the East. " Nothing," he replied. " I have even for 
 the moment suspended the drawing up of the protocol, of 
 which I had requested Greneral Sebastiani to apprize his 
 government. I restrain the eagerness of the Kussian nego- 
 tiator, and since M. Gruizot is soon expected in London, 
 bearing undoubtedly the last and complete idea of the French 
 cabinet, I think it much more desirable to wait his arrival 
 before resuming the discussion." " Thus then," I resumed, 
 " not only has nothing taken place, but nothing is preparing 
 during the interval ? " " No," replied Lord Palmerston,
 
 568 HISTORIC DOCUMENTS. . 
 
 " absolutely nothing." I smiled at the word eafjeimess applied 
 by Lord Palmerston to the Eussian negotiator, at first to 
 show him that I did not confound what belongs to the personal 
 part of the envoy with a pretended anxiety for the instructions 
 of his court; and, secondly, because the protocol committed to 
 the charge of the Baron de Brunnow, as an initiative, is repu- 
 diated by him in his confidential conversations, and I did not 
 wish Lord Palmerston to suppose me ignorant of that circum- 
 stance. I added nothing to this short digression. It belonged 
 neither to my instructions nor to my position to approach the 
 question in its entirety ; and I know from experience how 
 essential it is to be cautious in fastening on those axioms, 
 delivered on a first impression, which influence here more 
 than anywhere else, and too often clog the future with diSi- 
 culties. The ground is now clear ; the negotiation is really 
 suspended, and the King's new ambassador will enter on it 
 with the secret of the weakness of his adversaries. This 
 position is good, although still delicate. I should not like to 
 have to reproach myself \nth a single word tending to modify 
 it on the arrival of M. Guizot. 
 
 Baron de Brunnow replies to the questions addressed to 
 him, on the subject of his departure, that he has received 
 no counter-orders from his court, and that his instructions 
 directed him to leave London for Darmstadt on the 20th of 
 February ; but he adds that the journey of the Imperial 
 Grand Duke is delayed, and that this circumstance appears 
 to him naturally to entail the postponement of his own. In 
 fact, he assumes the air of preparing people's minds for the 
 prolongation of his residence. 
 
 • •••••• 
 
 Accept, &c. 
 
 BOURQUENEY. 
 THE END. 
 
 PlllNTED Dy 3POTTI3WO0DB AND CO. NEW-STREET S«UABE, LONDON 
 
 /J
 
 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY 
 
 Los Angeles 
 
 This book is DUE on the last date stamped below. 
 
 OCT?! 1952 
 APR 2 7 1956? - 
 
 NDV 2 3 196^ 
 
 pgr^^Pvrn 
 
 ^ 1 
 
 
 OCT 2^ 196 
 
 ^ .0 
 
 Vb-mi 
 
 /3PP2 
 
 
 ©;d 
 
 ^fc-o tayi?5 
 
 ,Vl 
 
 
 
 ;)Air4 LOAN DESn 
 
 'Ti- 
 
 r ! \*' ^£; [;;;;> 
 ,iA;ivJMN DESK 
 
 m^ 
 
 P.M 
 
 7l8lfell0|11112|112l3l4|P!< > 
 
 .M. 
 
 4 
 
 Form L9-25m-8.'46(9852)444 
 
 THE LIBRART 
 
 UNTVERJ^aTY C^ i ' "^ORKlA
 
 3 1158 00873 0664 
 
 V 
 
 UC SOUTHERN 
 
 AA 000 285178 o 
 
   *— -JUJr^HJ.Jv I ivi--.iini.i.-.»-«>Hi.^v.-.,-«».i..-.«.ii
 
 m 
 
 
 '•mi 
 
 r 
 
 
 » 1 1 L * i ^ t ^ 
 
 >